prepareforchange--2020-08-13--Benjamin Fulford Report 8/10/20: UFO Disclosure shows Elite Planning to follow up on Fake Pandemic w

Benjamin Fulford Report 8/10/20: UFO Disclosure shows Elite Planning to follow up on Fake Pandemic with Fake Alien Invasion

The Khazarian mafia is preparing the public for some form of alien disclosure or invasion scenario as they struggle to stay in power , Pentagon and other sources claim .
The most likely scenario for this autumn is the cancellation of the U.S. Presidential election followed by a UFO distraction , the sources say .
U.S. President Donald Trump himself is saying the election needs to be called off even as he continues to promote a “ Space force.
” MI6 sources , for their part , say all space activity has been grounded recently so this “ space force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ play the “ good guys ” who protect us from “ bad aliens.
” Soon to be appearing on a TV screen near you .
A strong indicator for this campaign was an article in the New York Times that among other things mentions the U.S. military has “ off-world vehicles not made on this earth.
” https : //www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/us/politics/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.html Many of the UFO evidence trails lead to the Rockefeller family .
To quote Mathew Ehret of the Strategic Culture Foundation : In 1993 , the Disclosure Initiative was created by none other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller ) .
During the heyday of the Rockefeller UFO Disclosure Initiative , the Clintons stayed at the Laurence Rockefeller ranch in Wyoming , during which time an early recruit to the “ disclosure mission ” was Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta .
During the Clinton White House years , Laurence Rockefeller recruited a bodybuilding biologist named Stephen Greer to become the controller of the Disclosure Project , which has provided his meal ticket to this very day .
Greer has given thousands of interviews promoting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lunar projects were stopped in 1972 merely because the aliens who have been stationed on the Moon for eons didn ’ t want the truth to leak out Area 51 during this period , which largely fed off the earlier social engineering experiment of H.G .
Wells ’ War of the Worlds emergency broadcast read aloud in 1938 .
This radio broadcast of a novel about a Martian invasion of Earth set off a real panic among the population and served as the template for a planned fake alien invasion aimed at cementing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ famous quote from Rockefeller bagman Henry Kissinger ?
The Naval Intelligence information-disinformation site Sorcha Faal is among the many sources now aggressively pushing the “ alien ” theme .
They confirm what CIA and Pentagon sources say that the November presidential election will… A small sample of the UFO and space-related media campaign now underway can be seen here : Your correspondent has been bombarded with alien-type information ever since pointing out the Rockefellers and their ilk were acting like self-appointed gods thanks to their ownership of the misnamed “ Federal ” Reserve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all Western corporate media ( for writing about the FRB , 911 , etc . )
and also faced a book ban in Japan , causing my income to evaporate , suddenly I received paid speaking invitations by “ alien ” and UFO groups .
This happened even though I was a financial journalist who never once in his career ever wrote about UFOs .
This campaign was followed up with a systematic whispering campaign to anybody I ever worked with as a professional journalist that “ Benjamin Fulford was taking drugs and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ better not have anything to do with him.
” Anyway , the big UFO-alien push is clearly a sign of elite desperation .
The reason for this is a wave of criminal probes zeroing in on them , CIA sources say .
Ghislaine Maxwell has been singing like a canary over elite pedophilia and her evidence is implicating a huge list of elite pedophiles .
This may be , for example , why the former King of Spain Juan Carlos has suddenly gone missing .
https : //www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53647170 The ongoing round up of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ series of other criminal probes targeting the elite .
For example , Chabad Satanist Trump ’ s son-in-law Jared Kushner and Trump himself are under investigation for questionable financial deals involving Deutschebank .
https : //www.zerohedge.com/political/deutsche-bank-launches-investigation-personal-banker-trump-kushner-over-2013-transaction We are also seeing pharmaceutical corporations being charged with manslaughter in a birth defects case .
https : //www.france24.com/en/20200803-pharma-giant-sanofi-charged-with-manslaughter-in-birth-defects-case If they are now being criminally charged for birth defects , what will happen when the truth about manufactured pandemics comes out ?
This e-mail from a whistleblower , if ( as is likely ) true , makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Satanic Chabad cult and their plans to kill 90 % of humanity : As many of you heard Moderna is in the 3rd and final stage of their vaccine development .
Here ’ s something many of you don ’ t know , guess who the first CEO of Moderna was ?
A Cornell graduate by the name of Anthony Fauci , who was a roommate with none other than Bill Gates .
Are you paying attention ?
It was at Cornell that Bill Gates designed the RFID ( Radio-frequency identification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Are you awake yet ?
Now let ’ s really go down the rabbit hole .
Moderna was a pharmaceutical company that started in Germany under the name IG Farben .
IG Farben is infamous for its mass production of Zyklon-B , the primary gas used to kill millions during the Holocaust .
After Germany fell , IG Farben was dissolved and its assets sold off by a Nazi turned American by the name of , you guessed it , George Soros .
Soros rebranded the company as Moderna .
And who was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death ?
Jeffrey Epstein .
His role in Moderna is where he made his fortune and established his connections .
When the still sleeping “ sheeple ” portion of the population finds out about elite crimes of this sort , you can be sure the reaction will be violent .
That is why the elite are pushing the alien card and other tricks .
We are also hearing from the NSA of an Israeli nuclear attack against Beirut .
FSB and MI6 sources say Israeli Crime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the attack to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ zeroing in on him .
We are also hearing from Pentagon White Hat sources that any “ October surprise ” by the Khazarian mob will be met with a “ November surprise.
” The nature of this surprise is not known but it is a good guess that neither Trump nor Biden will be president in 2021 .
No matter what though , the overall geopolitical stalemate we have been experiencing throughout the summer is expected to end in a dramatic fashion this autumn .
This may involve a limited war in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Zionists to stop their constant terrorism and troublemaking .
Any other Israeli nuclear attack like the one on Lebanon ( confirmed as such by both the Pentagon and MI6 ) will be met with a response such as the destruction of Tel Aviv , gnostic Illuminati sources say .
DIA sources contacted me just before this report went live to add : If the Israelis want to remain a constructive part of humanity , they will need to remove their mass-murdering Nazi leader Netanyahu and his Khazarian Zionist bosses who are hiding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the British Virgin Islands , Switzerland , etc .
Until they do , elite disappearances , such as that of the former Spanish King Carlos , will only continue and expand .
Finally , this week we would like to report the local home center near my cottage in Canada says they have been under attack for weeks from hackers .
When I was there the lights kept going on and off and all the electronic payments systems were failing .
The result was that only cash worked .
We hear this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ financial system and is not restricted to my local store .
In any case , this incident reveals key faults in “ digital money ” : it needs electricity to work and is vulnerable to hackers .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

The Khazarian mafia is preparing the public for some form of alien disclosure or invasion scenario as they struggle to stay in power, Pentagon and other sources claim. The most likely scenario for this autumn is the cancellation of the U.S. Presidential election followed by a UFO distraction, the sources say. U.S. President Donald Trump himself is saying the election needs to be called off even as he continues to promote a “Space force.”
MI6 sources, for their part, say all space activity has been grounded recently so this “space force” may well be actors who will play the “good guys” who protect us from “bad aliens.” Soon to be appearing on a TV screen near you.
A strong indicator for this campaign was an article in the New York Times that among other things mentions the U.S. military has “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.” https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/us/politics/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.html
Many of the UFO evidence trails lead to the Rockefeller family. To quote Mathew Ehret of the Strategic Culture Foundation:
In 1993, the Disclosure Initiative was created by none other than financier Laurence Rockefeller (4th son of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller). During the heyday of the Rockefeller UFO Disclosure Initiative, the Clintons stayed at the Laurence Rockefeller ranch in Wyoming, during which time an early recruit to the “disclosure mission” was Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta. During the Clinton White House years, Laurence Rockefeller recruited a bodybuilding biologist named Stephen Greer to become the controller of the Disclosure Project, which has provided his meal ticket to this very day. Greer has given thousands of interviews promoting the narrative that NASA’s Apollo Lunar projects were stopped in 1972 merely because the aliens who have been stationed on the Moon for eons didn’t want the truth to leak out Area 51 during this period, which largely fed off the earlier social engineering experiment of H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds emergency broadcast read aloud in 1938.
This radio broadcast of a novel about a Martian invasion of Earth set off a real panic among the population and served as the template for a planned fake alien invasion aimed at cementing control over the population.
Remember this famous quote from Rockefeller bagman Henry Kissinger?
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” – Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
Source https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/kissingers-very-strange-remarks.8651/
The Naval Intelligence information-disinformation site Sorcha Faal is among the many sources now aggressively pushing the “alien” theme. They confirm what CIA and Pentagon sources say that the November presidential election will…
be canceled and:
A small sample of the UFO and space-related media campaign now underway can be seen here:
https://www.adn.com/nation-world/2017/01/31/now-you-can-read-the-cias-once-secret-stash-online/
https://spacenews.com/white-house-nominates-four-u-s-space-force-major-generals-for-promotion/
https://eurasiantimes.com/russia-china-will-develop-a-joint-moon-base-russian-space-agency/
https://www.thehour.com/news/article/NASA-seeks-to-keep-momentum-going-after-successes-15455827.php
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/07/spacex-and-ula-win-2022-pentagon-rocket-launch-contracts.html
https://news.yahoo.com/richard-branson-space-bound-early-2021-says-virgin-084900952.html
Your correspondent has been bombarded with alien-type information ever since pointing out the Rockefellers and their ilk were acting like self-appointed gods thanks to their ownership of the misnamed “Federal” Reserve Board. When I was blacklisted from all Western corporate media (for writing about the FRB, 911, etc.) and also faced a book ban in Japan, causing my income to evaporate, suddenly I received paid speaking invitations by “alien” and UFO groups.
This happened even though I was a financial journalist who never once in his career ever wrote about UFOs. This campaign was followed up with a systematic whispering campaign to anybody I ever worked with as a professional journalist that “Benjamin Fulford was taking drugs and talking crazy alien stuff so you had better not have anything to do with him.”
Anyway, the big UFO-alien push is clearly a sign of elite desperation. The reason for this is a wave of criminal probes zeroing in on them, CIA sources say. Ghislaine Maxwell has been singing like a canary over elite pedophilia and her evidence is implicating a huge list of elite pedophiles. This may be, for example, why the former King of Spain Juan Carlos has suddenly gone missing. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53647170
The ongoing round up of elite pedophiles is also distracting from a series of other criminal probes targeting the elite. For example, Chabad Satanist Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and Trump himself are under investigation for questionable financial deals involving Deutschebank. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/deutsche-bank-launches-investigation-personal-banker-trump-kushner-over-2013-transaction
We are also seeing pharmaceutical corporations being charged with manslaughter in a birth defects case. https://www.france24.com/en/20200803-pharma-giant-sanofi-charged-with-manslaughter-in-birth-defects-case
If they are now being criminally charged for birth defects, what will happen when the truth about manufactured pandemics comes out?
This e-mail from a whistleblower, if (as is likely) true, makes it clear the ongoing pandemic has roots to the Satanic Chabad cult and their plans to kill 90% of humanity:
As many of you heard Moderna is in the 3rd and final stage of their vaccine development. Here’s something many of you don’t know, guess who the first CEO of Moderna was? A Cornell graduate by the name of Anthony Fauci, who was a roommate with none other than Bill Gates. Are you paying attention? It was at Cornell that Bill Gates designed the RFID (Radio-frequency identification) and patented it under US2006257852. Are you awake yet? Now let’s really go down the rabbit hole. Moderna was a pharmaceutical company that started in Germany under the name IG Farben. IG Farben is infamous for its mass production of Zyklon-B, the primary gas used to kill millions during the Holocaust. After Germany fell, IG Farben was dissolved and its assets sold off by a Nazi turned American by the name of, you guessed it, George Soros. Soros rebranded the company as Moderna. And who was the primary stockholder of Moderna until his death? Jeffrey Epstein. His role in Moderna is where he made his fortune and established his connections.
When the still sleeping “sheeple” portion of the population finds out about elite crimes of this sort, you can be sure the reaction will be violent. That is why the elite are pushing the alien card and other tricks.
We are also hearing from the NSA of an Israeli nuclear attack against Beirut. FSB and MI6 sources say Israeli Crime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the attack to try to derail criminal probes that are zeroing in on him.
We are also hearing from Pentagon White Hat sources that any “October surprise” by the Khazarian mob will be met with a “November surprise.” The nature of this surprise is not known but it is a good guess that neither Trump nor Biden will be president in 2021.
No matter what though, the overall geopolitical stalemate we have been experiencing throughout the summer is expected to end in a dramatic fashion this autumn. This may involve a limited war in the Middle East aimed at forcing Israel and the Zionists to stop their constant terrorism and troublemaking.
Any other Israeli nuclear attack like the one on Lebanon (confirmed as such by both the Pentagon and MI6) will be met with a response such as the destruction of Tel Aviv, gnostic Illuminati sources say.
DIA sources contacted me just before this report went live to add:
Israel nuking Beirut may have hastened its demise and sealed Bibi’s fate as a serial war criminal. ICC may expand its prosecution to include Beirut which is not just a war crime but a crime against humanity. Trump was forced by the military to drop the truth bomb and may have to utter the N and I word in the same sentence since the missile strike has been exposed on video and gone viral. Trump’s October surprise may have been moved up to August, and in his crosshairs are 911 declassifications, Zionist and Jewish billionaires like Adelson, Paul Singer, Haim Saban, and those who fund the democrats. Undercover of aid for Lebanon, world leaders led by the UN, EU, France, UK, Denmark, Russia and England and the G20 may impose the final solution on Israel helping Trump to terminate Zionist enemies foreign and domestic In retaliation for nuking the Christian sector of Beirut and to stop further nuking by Zionist psychopaths, Russia may use Israel as a testing ground for its weapons like the Poseidon nuke torpedo
If the Israelis want to remain a constructive part of humanity, they will need to remove their mass-murdering Nazi leader Netanyahu and his Khazarian Zionist bosses who are hiding out in such places as New Zealand, the British Virgin Islands, Switzerland, etc. Until they do, elite disappearances, such as that of the former Spanish King Carlos, will only continue and expand.
Finally, this week we would like to report the local home center near my cottage in Canada says they have been under attack for weeks from hackers. When I was there the lights kept going on and off and all the electronic payments systems were failing. The result was that only cash worked. We hear this sort of trouble is happening throughout the financial system and is not restricted to my local store. In any case, this incident reveals key faults in “digital money”: it needs electricity to work and is vulnerable to hackers.
Source: https://benjaminfulford.net/
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-08-13--Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Sues FDA, HHS over Hydroxychloroquine Censorship

More Evidence Presented for Why Hydroxychloroquine Should be Made Available , in a New Court Filing by AAPS by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons , This week the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons submitted additional evidence to a federal court for why interference with hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) should end by the Food & Drug Administration ( FDA ) and the Department of Health & Human Services ( HHS ) , in AAPS v. FDA , No .
1:20-cv-00493-RJJ-SJB ( W.D .
Mich. ) .
“ As confirmed by another recent study of thousands of patients at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HCQ is both very safe and highly effective in treating COVID-19 , reducing mortality by 50 % , ” AAPS informed the court in its filing .
“ Countries with underdeveloped health care systems are using HCQ early and attaining far lower mortality than in the United States , where [ HHS and the FDA ] impede access to HCQ.
” Yet most Americans are still unable to obtain HCQ for early treatment of COVID-19 , and virtually no Americans are able to access it as preventive medicine .
HCQ has been used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against malaria , but Americans are dying from COVID-19 while HCQ is withheld from them .
“ Citizens of the Philippines , Poland , Israel , and Turkey all have greater access to HCQ than American citizens do , ” observes AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly .
“ In Venezuela , HCQ is available over the counter without a prescription , while in the United States pharmacists are prevented from filling prescriptions for HCQ.
” AAPS rebuts arguments presented by the FDA , which implied that medications are approved as safe only for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and most medications have been approved without limitation , such that physicians can prescribe them for any off-label use .
“ The mortality rate from COVID-19 in countries that allow access to HCQ is only one-tenth the mortality rate in countries where there is interference with this medication , such as the United States , ” explains Andrew Schlafly .
Polish chemists have even showed the world how to synthesize HCQ from cheaply , widely available ingredients .
The cost of this medication is less than a dollar a dose , in contrast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by FDA officials .
In its filing , the FDA insisted that the public has no right to access nearly 100 million doses of HCQ which were donated to the Strategic National Stockpile .
HHS is having that medication waste away while Americans are dying from COVID-19 .
“ In some areas of Central America , officials are even going door to door to distribute HCQ , ” Andrew Schlafly adds .
“ These countries have been successful in limiting the mortality from COVID-19 to only a fraction of what it is in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to obtain legal redress in support of Trump , by ending the obstruction by the FDA of his policies that would save lives.AAPS has represented physicians of all specialties in all states since 1943 .
The AAPS motto is omnia pro aegroto , meaning everything for the patient .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in @ @ @ @

More Evidence Presented for Why Hydroxychloroquine Should be Made Available, in a New Court Filing by AAPS
by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons,
This week the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons submitted additional evidence to a federal court for why interference with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) should end by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), in AAPS v. FDA, No. 1:20-cv-00493-RJJ-SJB (W.D. Mich.).
“As confirmed by another recent study of thousands of patients at the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, HCQ is both very safe and highly effective in treating COVID-19, reducing mortality by 50%,” AAPS informed the court in its filing. “Countries with underdeveloped health care systems are using HCQ early and attaining far lower mortality than in the United States, where [HHS and the FDA] impede access to HCQ.”
Yet most Americans are still unable to obtain HCQ for early treatment of COVID-19, and virtually no Americans are able to access it as preventive medicine. HCQ has been used safely for decades by travelers to protect against malaria, but Americans are dying from COVID-19 while HCQ is withheld from them.
“Citizens of the Philippines, Poland, Israel, and Turkey all have greater access to HCQ than American citizens do,” observes AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly. “In Venezuela, HCQ is available over the counter without a prescription, while in the United States pharmacists are prevented from filling prescriptions for HCQ.”
AAPS rebuts arguments presented by the FDA, which implied that medications are approved as safe only for certain conditions. In fact, HCQ and most medications have been approved without limitation, such that physicians can prescribe them for any off-label use.
“The mortality rate from COVID-19 in countries that allow access to HCQ is only one-tenth the mortality rate in countries where there is interference with this medication, such as the United States,” explains Andrew Schlafly.
Polish chemists have even showed the world how to synthesize HCQ from cheaply, widely available ingredients. The cost of this medication is less than a dollar a dose, in contrast with the very expensive alternatives being pushed by FDA officials.
In its filing, the FDA insisted that the public has no right to access nearly 100 million doses of HCQ which were donated to the Strategic National Stockpile. HHS is having that medication waste away while Americans are dying from COVID-19.
“In some areas of Central America, officials are even going door to door to distribute HCQ,” Andrew Schlafly adds. “These countries have been successful in limiting the mortality from COVID-19 to only a fraction of what it is in wealthier countries.”
AAPS filed this lawsuit to obtain legal redress in support of Trump, by ending the obstruction by the FDA of his policies that would save lives.AAPS has represented physicians of all specialties in all states since 1943. The AAPS motto is omnia pro aegroto, meaning everything for the patient.
Source: https://aapsonline.org
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-08-13--How a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Was Created, and More

It is remarkable that a series of events taking place over the past 3 months produced a unified message about hydroxychloroquine , and produced similar policies about the drug in the US , Canada , Australia , NZ and western Europe .
The message is that generic , inexpensive hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and should not be used to treat a potentially fatal disease , Covid-19 , for which there are no ( other ) reliable treatments .
Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for 65 years in many millions of patients .
And so the message was crafted that the drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but dangerous when used for Covid-19 .
It doesn ’ t make sense , but it seems to have worked .
In the US , “ Never Trump ” morphed into “ Never Hydroxychloroquine , ” and the result for the pandemic is “ Never Over.
” But while anti-Trump spin is what characterized suppression strategies in the US , the frauds perpetrated about hydroxychloroquine and the pandemic include most western countries .
Were these acts carefully orchestrated ?
You decide .
Might these events have been planned to keep the pandemic going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a captive population ?
Could these acts result in prolonged economic and social hardship , eventually transferring wealth from the middle class to the very rich ?
Are these events evidence of a conspiracy ?
Here is a list of what happened , in no special order .
Please help add to this list if you know of other actions I should include .
This will be a living document , added to as new information becomes available .
I have penned this as if it is the “ To Do ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who pull the strings .
The items on the list have already been carried out .
One wonders what else might be on their list , yet to be carried out , for this pandemic .
• You stop doctors from using the drug in ways it is most likely to be effective ( in outpatients at onset of illness ) .
You prohibit use outside of situations you can control .
Situations that were controlled to show no benefit included 3 large , randomized , multi-center clinical trials ( Recovery , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of trials that are generally believed to yield the most reliable evidence .
However , each of them used excessive hydroxychloroquine doses that were known to be toxic and may have been fatal in some cases ; see my previous articles here and here .
• You prevent or limit use in outpatients by controlling the supply of the drug , using different methods in different countries andstates .
In NY state , by order of the governor , hydroxychloroquine could only be prescribed for hospitalized patients .
France has issued a series @ @ @ @ @ @ @ using it .
France also changed the drugs ’ status from over-the-counter to a drug requiring a prescription .
• You play up the danger of the drug , emphasizing side effects that are very rare when the drug is used correctly .
You make sure everyone has heard about theman who died after consuming hydroxychloroquine in the form of fish tank cleaner .
Yet its toxicity at approved doses is minimal .
Chloroquine was added to table salt in some regions in the 1950s as a malaria preventive , according to Professor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Recovery trial .
• You limit clinical trials to hospitalized patients , instead of testing the drug in outpatients , early in the illness , when it is predicted to be most effective .
Finally , but not until May , you have Fauci ’ s NIAID conduct a trial in outpatients , using hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin , but you only enroll 20 patients , after earlier planning for 2,000 .
Only half get the drugs .
You reduce the duration of followup from 24 weeks to 13 days post treatment .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results .
Who pulled the plug on this trial ?
• You design clinical trials to givemuch too high a dose , ensuring the drug will cause harm in some subjects , sufficient to mask any possible beneficial effect .
You make sure that trials in 400 hospitals in 35 countries ( Solidarity ) plus most hospitals in the UK ( Recovery ) use these dangerous doses , as well as additional sites in 13 countries ( REMAP-Covid trial ) .
• You design clinical trials tocollect almost no safety data , so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ toxicity will be attributed to the disease instead of the drug .
• You issue rules for use of the drug based on theresults of the UK Recovery study , which overdosed patients .
Of course the Recovery results showed more deaths in the hydroxychloroquine arm , since they gave patients 2.4 g in the first 24 hrs , 800 mg/day thereafter .
Furthermore , the UK has the 2nd highest death rate in the world for Covid-19 ( Belgium is 1st ) , so simply conducting the trial in the UK may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • You publish , in the world ’ s most-read medical journal , the Lancet , an observationalstudy from a huge worldwide database ( 96,000 Covid cases ) that says use of chloroquine drugs caused significantly increased mortality .
You make sure that all major media report on this result .
This was said to be the nail in the coffin for hydroxychloroquine .
Then you have 3 European countries announce they will not allow doctors to prescribe the drug .
• You do your best to ride out any controversy , never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people renounced the Lancet ’ s observational study due to easily identified fabrications–the database used in the study did not exist , and the claimed numbers did not agree with known numbers of cases–the Lancet held firm for two weeks , serving to muddy the waters about the trial , until finally 3 of its 4 coauthors ( but not the journal ) retracted the study .
But neither the authors nor the journal admitted responsibility .
You make sure very few media report that the data were fabricated and the “ study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ story was full of scandalous details , it went largely unnoticed .
You make sure people believe the original story : that hydroxychloroquine routinely kills .
• You ensure federal agencies like FDA and CDC hew to your desired policies .
For example , FDA advised use only in hospitalized patients ( too late ) or in clinical trials ( which are limited , are difficult to enroll in , or may use excessive doses ) .
As of mid June , FDA advises patients and doctors to only give the drug to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial where , presumably , the results can be controlled .
Another example : you have FDA make unsubstantiated and false claims , such as : “ Hospitalized patients were likely to have greater prospect of benefit ( compared to ambulatory patients with mild illness ) “ and claim the chloroquine drugs have a slow onset of action .
If that were really true , they would not be used for acute attacks of malaria or in critically ill patients with Covid .
( Disclosure : I once dosed myself with chloroquine for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and it worked very fast. )
.
Providing no other treatment advice , even though providing such information is a large part of its mission , CDC instead refers clinicians to the NIH guidelines , discussed below .
Despite the fact that Belgium ’ s COVID treatment guidelines repeatedly mention that the doses of HCQ in the Recovery and Solidarity trials were 4 times the cumulative dose used in Belgium , you make sure the Belgian guidelines , paradoxically , only recommend use of HCQ within clinical trials .
• You make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ test drug combinations like hydroxychloroquine with zinc , with azithromycin , or with both , although there is ample clinical evidence that such combinations provide a cumulative benefit to patients .
For example , oneof very few studies to look at this combination had no funding .
• You have federal and UN agencies make false , illogical claims based on models ( or invention ) rather than human data .
For example , you have the FDA state on June 15 that the doserequired to treat Covid is so high it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trials have been exposed for toxic dosing .
This scientific double-speak gives some legal cover to the clinical trials that overdosed their patients .
According to Denise Hinton , RN , the FDA ’ s Chief Scientist ( yes , a registered nurse without scientific qualifications is the Chief Scientist at FDA ) , or some clumsy FDA wordsmith : “ Under the assumption that in vivo cellular accumulation is similar to that from the in vitro cell-based assays , the calculated free lung concentrations that would result from the EUA suggested dosing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ EC50/EC90 values , making the antiviral effect against SARS-CoV-2 not likely achievable with the dosing regimens recommended in the EUA .
The substantial increase in dosing that would be needed to increase the likelihood of an antiviral effect would not be acceptable due to toxicity concerns.
” You have a WHO report claim toxic doses are needed .
This is nonsense since : • the drug at normal doses is being tested in over 30 different medical conditions ( see clinicaltrials.gov ) , and • reports from many different countries say that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doses , while • a high dose chloroquine treatment trial was halted in Brazil and a preprint of the study was posted April 11 , or perhaps April 7 , after finding that drug effects were causing ventricular arrhythmias and deaths .
Toxicity was noted after only 3 days of treatment , during which 3.6 grams of chloroquine were administered .
But the Solidarity ( 3.2 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days ) , Recovery ( 3.6 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days ) and REMAP-Covid trials ( 3.6 grams of hydroxychloroquine in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ June , despite Brazil ’ s evidence of deaths by overdose .
Tellingly , JAMA editor Gordon Rubenfeld wrote in April , after the Brazilian study came out in JAMA , “ if you are prescribing HCQ after these JAMA results , do yourself and your defense lawyer a favor .
Document in your medical record that you informed the patient of the potential risks of HCQ including sudden death and its benefits ( ?
?
? )
.
” • You create an NIH Guidelines committee for Covid treatment recommendations , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Gilead , maker of Remdesivir .
The members were appointed by the Co-Chairs .
Two of the three Co-Chairs are themselves financially entangled with Gilead .
Are you surprised that their guidelines recommend specifically against the use of hydroxychloroquine and in favor of Remdesivir , and that they deem this the new “ standard of care ” ?
• You frighten doctors so they don ’ t prescribe hydroxychloroquine , if prescribing it is even allowed in their jurisdiction , because prescribing outside the newNIH “ standard of care ” leaves them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tell them ( through the FDA ) they need to monitor a variety of lab parameters and patient EKGs when using the drug , although this was never advised before , which makes it very difficult to use the drug in outpatients .
You have the European Medicines Agency issue similar warnings .
• You manage to control the conduct of most trials around the world by specially designing the WHO-managedSolidarity trials , currently conducted in 35 countries .
WHO halted hydroxychloroquine clinical trials around the world , twice .
The first time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was in response to the ( fraudulent ) Lancet study .
The second time , June 17 , WHO claimed the stop was in response to the Recovery trial results .
Recovery used highly toxic doses of hydroxychloroquine in over 1500 patients , of whom 396 died .
You stop the trial before the data safety monitoring board has looked at your data , a move that is unlikely to be consistent with trial protocol .
WHO ’ s trial in over 400 hospitals overdosed patients with 2.0 g hydroxychloroquine in the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 days after the toxic doses were exposed ( by me ) .
The trial involved doctors around the world typing minimal patient information into an online WHO platform , which assigned the patient a treatment .
The only “ safety ” information collected during the trial was whether patients required oxygen , required a ventilator , or died .
This effectively masked the adverse effects of the drugs tested .
I should mention that WHO ’ s initial plan for its Solidarity trial entirely omitted the chloroquine drugs , but they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
WHO ’ s fallback position appears to have been to use toxic doses .
• You have theWHO pressure governments to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine .
• You have theWHO pressure professional societies to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine .
• You make sure that the most-consulted US medical encyclopedia , UptoDate , advises physicians to restrict hydroxychloroquine to only clinical trials , citing the FDA .
• You have the head of the Coronavirus Task Force , Dr. Tony Fauci , insist the drug can not be used in the absence of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the case of the MERS coronavirus outbreak several years ago , when he recommended an untested drug combination for use…which had been developed for that purpose by his agency .
And while he was bemoaning the lack of evidence , he was refusing to pay for trials to study hydroxychloroquine .
And he was changing the goalposts on the Remdesivir trial , not once but twice , to make Remdesivir show a tiny bit of benefit , but no mortality benefit .
And don ’ t forget , Fauci was thrilled to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in humans before there were any data from animal trials .
So much for requiring high quality evidence before risking use of drugs and vaccines in humans .
• You convince the population that the crisis will be long-lasting .
You have the 2nd richest man in the world , and biggest funder of the WHO , Bill Gates , keep repeating to the media megaphone that we can not go back to normal until everyone has been vaccinated or there is a perfect drug .
( The Gates Foundation helped design the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Recovery trial , and Gates is heavily invested in Covid pharmaceuticals and vaccines . )
• You have CDC ( with help from FDA ) prevent the purchase of coronavirus test kits from Germany , China , WHO , etc , and fail to produce a valid test kit themselves .
The result was that during January and February , US cases could not be tested , and for several months thereafter insufficient and unreliable test kits made it impossible to track the epidemic and stop the spread .
• You have trusted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pandemic ’ s severity , so precautions weren ’ t taken when they might have been more effective and less long-lasting .
Congress was repeatedly briefed about the pandemic in January and February , which scared several Congress members enough that they sold off large amounts of stock , risking insider trading charges .
Senator Burr is one of them , currentlyunder investigation for major stock sales on February 13 .
Yet Dr. Fauci told USA Today on February 17 that Americans should worry more about the flu than about coronavirus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ miniscule.
” Then on February 28 , Drs .
Fauci and Robert Redfield ( CDC Director ) wrote in the New England Journal : “ …the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza ( which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1 % ) or a pandemic influenza ( similar to those in 1957 and 1968 ) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS , which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10 % and 36 % , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of respected physicians who stand in your way .
Professor Didier Raoult and his team in Marseille have used hydroxychloroquine on over 4,000 patients , reporting a mortality rate of about 0.8 % .
( The mortality rate of patients given hydroxychloroquine in the Recovery trial was 25.7 % . )
Raoult is very famous for discovering over 100 different microorganisms , and finding the long-sought cause of Whipple ’ s Disease .
With this reputation , Raoult apparently thought he could treat patients as he saw fit , which he has done @ @ @ @ @ @ @ featured in a New York Times Magazine article , with his face on the magazine cover , on May 12 , 2020 .
After describing his accomplishments , the Times very unfavorably discussed his personality , implied he conducted unethical trials without approval , and using anonymous sourcing produced a detailed hit piece .
Raoult is now considered an unreliable crank in the US .
Physician and state senator Scott Jensen of Minnesota is being investigated by his state medical board due to anonymous complaints about ‘ spreading misinformation ’ and giving ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Jensen was previously selected as “ Family Physician of the Year ” in his state .
Now his medical license is at risk , not because of how he treated a patient , but for what he said outside of the office .
Unprecedented .
UPDATE : Jensen was exonerated .
• You have social media platforms ban content that does not agree with the desired narrative .
As YouTube CEO and ex-wife of Google founder Sergey Brin , Susan Wojcickisaid , “ YouTube will ban any content containing medical advice that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus recommendations .
Anything that would go against World Health Organisation recommendations would be a violation of our policy.
” • When your clinical trials are criticized for overdosing patients , you have Oxford-affiliated , Wellcome Trust-supported scientists at Mahidol University publish papers ( aliterature review with modeling and a modeling study ) purporting to show that the doses used were not toxic .
You develop a new method to measure hydroxychloroquine in a handful of Recovery patients who were not poisoned .
However , there are 2 problems you forgot with this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including 16 deaths , extensive clinical information and documented ventricular arrhythmias , are much more persuasive than a theoretical model of hydroxychloroquine pharmacokinetics .
• Either the drug is too toxic to use , even at normal doses , for a life-threatening disease , or even extremely high doses are safe .
You can ’ t have it both ways .
Oxford is the institution running the Recovery trial , and invented a Covid vaccine that already has 400 million doses on order .
The Wellcome Trust funded the Recovery trial .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outcome measures after the trials have started , in order to prevent detection of drug-induced deaths ( Recovery ) or to make your drug appear to have efficacy ( NIAID Remdesivir trial ) .
• You stop manufacturers from supplying the drug .
Shortly after the fraudulent Lancetpaper came out , Sanofi announced it would no longer supply the drug for use with Covid , and would halt its two hydroxychloroquine clinical trials .
One of the cancelled Sanofi trials was expected to test 210 outpatients early in the course of disease .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of writing , while the Lancet paper was retracted 13 days after publication .
You surely don ’ t want a trial of hydroxychloroquine treatment early in the disease , since it might show an excellent effect .
Then Sanofi started collecting information on all off-label use of hydroxychloroquine in New Zealand and Australia .
Why is Sanofi , a drug manufacturing company , becoming a surveillance/enforcement mechanism intended to frighten medical providers from using the drug for Covid , which use is by definition “ off label.
” Sanofi alternatively suggests one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others ’ off-label use to New Zealand ’ s Pharmacovigilance Center or the Australian equivalent .
And see this : Novartis will supply HCQ only under certain conditions , and halted its HCQ trial due to lack of enrollments , although enrollment was not an issue for its other COVID trials .
• You attempt to retract published papersthat provide evidence to support use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID .
• You have your ‘ bought ’ scientists conceal their financial conflicts of interest in their HCQ clinical trials and publicationsas well as in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can get your experimental , unlicensed drugs tested , much more expeditiously and cheaply than under ordinary circumstances , on Covid patients in large clinical trials , but only as long as no drug is designated effective for the condition .
This opportunity only lasts while the “ standard of care ” is nothing more than supportive measures .
• You have a research organization with big Pharma members ( A.O.K.I . )
pressure the Russian Ministry of Healthto remove hydroxychloroquine from its treatment guidelines .
• You stopped use of hydroxychloroquine , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study , in France , Italy and Belgium ( countries with very high COVID mortality rates ) then Portugal then Switzerland .
But Switzerland restarted using HCQ 15 days later .
This created a natural experiment in Switzerland .
About 2 weeks after hydroxychloroquine use was halted , death rates approximately tripled , for about 15 days .
Then , after its use was allowed again , two weeks later death rates from Covid fell back to their baseline .
( Thanks to FranceSoir : • You reverse an old trick of clinical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The trick was to replace the saline placebo with a substance that is being used by many cliniciansand in many trials against Covid , thus by comparison likely to reduce the positive effect of your tested medication .
This was done in trials both at NYU and at University of Washington , using vitamin C or vitamin C and folate respectively as placebos .
• You have the chief medical officers of Wales , England , Scotland and Northern Ireland , and the director of the UK ’ s National Health Service @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) urging them to enroll their Covid patients in one of 3 national clinical trials , two of which greatly overdosed patients with hydroxychloroquine , and b ) stopping their use of “ off license treatments ” outside of a trial .
Yet again , we encounter a veiled threat against clinicians actually attempting to treat the primary SARS-Cov-2 infection .
The chief doctors wrote : While it is for every individual clinician to make prescribing decisions , we strongly discourage the use of off-licence treatments outside of a trial , where participation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given for coronavirus other than general supportive care , treatment for underlying conditions , and antibiotics for secondary bacterial complications , should currently be as part of a trial , where that is possible.
” • You have a state Pharmacy Board refuse to dispense hydroxychloroquine outside of clinical trialson June 15 , citing the FDA recommendation for use only in trials .
You issue this new regulation on the same day that FDA publishes its recommendation , indicating prior coordination .
But when your regulation is exposed on July 14 , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the IMF offer rapid financing to Belarus , but only if it follows the recommended model of Covid responseand imposes quarantines , isolation and curfews .
• A group of doctors went to Washington DC July 27-28 .
They called themselves “ America ’ s Frontline Doctors ” and gave a press conference and livestream talks about the Covid-19 pandemic as well as about the need for physicians to be able to prescribe HCQ freely .
While the media sparsely attended the press conference , the livestream got millions of views .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Google , YouTube , Facebook and Twitter .
Twitter was said to additionally ban comments about its ban .
Then Squarespace took down the Frontline Doctors ’ website .
Today , Bitchute is hosting their press conference .
So is Brighteon .
In those media that describe what happened , the group is tarred for providing misinformation .
• After the HCQ issue got so much attention on social media , you impose another ban on July 29 on the prescribing of HCQ for Covid , starting July 30 in Ohio , using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what they may not prescribe .
( A repeat of # 35 in a different state . )
This ban got so much attention that the Ohio Governor ( who must have initially supported it ) rescinded it the next morning .
July 30 , saying he agrees with FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn , who said in a July 30 interview that the prescribing of HCQ is between a doctor and patient .
• After having Google take down physician James Todaro ’ s article on hydroxychloroquinefor 4 months , you allow it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( and Facebook ’ s and Amazon ’ s and Apple ’ s ) CEOs testify before Congress on July 29 on censorship and abuse of power .
You have Twitter warn that Todaro ’ s article is at an unsafe link .
• After massive attention to the banning of the videos posted by the physician group ‘ America ’ s Frontline Physicians ’ and its website , you make intense efforts to discredit the physicians involved .
MedPageToday claimed it “ could find no evidence that any of the speakers worked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients.
” But the doctors claimed they used the drug early and prevented hospitalizations and deaths .
With over 4.4 million Americans diagnosed with Covid , what doctor hasn ’ t seen a Covid patient ?
USAT headlined : ‘ America ’ s Frontline Doctors ’ may be real doctors , but experts say they don ’ t know what they ’ re talking about .
You have USA Today review and publish detailed information on the licenses , practice locations and malpractice histories of the doctors who spoke out .
USAT reporters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lack knowledge about the use of HCQ in Covid-19 , despite the fact that most work in primary care , urgent care or emergency medicine and report using the drug for Covid .
Yet no one asks how many years ago ‘ expert ’ Fauci last treated a patient ?
Expert Birx ’ medical license expired in 2014 , so she hasn ’ t treated a Covid patient either .
• Hydroxychloroquine use is truly the wedge issue for understanding and turning around the pandemic .
If hydroxychloroquine works reasonably well as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could potentially end the seriousness of the pandemic and return us to life as we knew it .
You must make use of the levers of government , mainstream media and social media to stop that from happening .
So , just in case doctors thought the Frontline Doctors ’ video , or a new study from Spain showing the drug ’ s usefulness meant they should use hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid , you must act fast .
You use Representatives at a Congressional health subcommittee hearing on July 29 to threaten doctors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ April in veterans who were nursing home patients .
Per the Washington Post : “ doctors at the 238-bed nursing home dosed [ 30 ] patients with what came to be called a “ covid cocktail ” for more than two weeks in April , often over the objections of nurses and without the full knowledge of residents ’ families .
At least 11 residents received the drug even though they had not been tested for covid-19 , The Post found.
” I have treated patients in nursing homes , and one rarely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the patient is seriously ill .
When nursing home residents were dying like flies last April , when tests were hard to come by and confirmed diagnoses few and far between , doctors used this medicine to try to prevent nursing home deaths during a pandemic .
And now they are being scapegoated for doing so .
The WaPo article does not even tell us whether the patients survived , thrived or were harmed .
The article hardly makes sense .
Its only purpose is to blacken the drug and the physicians who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Medical Licensing Boards tothreaten doctors who claim there is a cure for Covid-19 .
• You have Dr. Faucidiscredit published observational studies that show benefit during a Congressional hearing , demanding randomized controlled trials .
Fauci never tells the Committee he has cancelled the one randomized controlled trial of HCQ that his agency , NIAID , was supposed to conduct on HCQ .
NIAID claimed that it could not enroll enough subjects , and was cancelled after only 20 were enrolled .
However , Fauci told the Committee that 250,000 Americans have shown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Covid vaccine .
It is difficult to believe there was extreme lack of interest in a treatment trial , and such massive interest in a vaccine trial .
Doctors who wrote studies showing benefit ( 50 % mortality reduction ) defended their work from Fauci ’ s criticism .
• Youerode the doctor ’ s primary responsibility to the patient , replacing it with the need to perform clinical research .
This is the first time I have ever heard such a thing : research physicians are pressuring frontline doctors not to veer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enrolled in treatment trials are at risk of death .
• You mention the “ stellar ” Recovery trial in the August 5NY Times , but avoid any hint that its hydroxychloroquine arm gave patients a toxic dose .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

By Meryl Nass, M.D.
It is remarkable that a series of events taking place over the past 3 months produced a unified message about hydroxychloroquine, and produced similar policies about the drug in the US, Canada, Australia, NZ and western Europe. The message is that generic, inexpensive hydroxychloroquine is dangerous and should not be used to treat a potentially fatal disease, Covid-19, for which there are no (other) reliable treatments.
Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for 65 years in many millions of patients. And so the message was crafted that the drug is safe for its other uses, but dangerous when used for Covid-19. It doesn’t make sense, but it seems to have worked.
In the US, “Never Trump” morphed into “Never Hydroxychloroquine,” and the result for the pandemic is “Never Over.” But while anti-Trump spin is what characterized suppression strategies in the US, the frauds perpetrated about hydroxychloroquine and the pandemic include most western countries.
Were these acts carefully orchestrated? You decide.
Might these events have been planned to keep the pandemic going? To sell expensive drugs and vaccines to a captive population? Could these acts result in prolonged economic and social hardship, eventually transferring wealth from the middle class to the very rich? Are these events evidence of a conspiracy?
Here is a list of what happened, in no special order. Please help add to this list if you know of other actions I should include. This will be a living document, added to as new information becomes available.
I have penned this as if it is the “To Do” list of items to be accomplished by those who pull the strings. The items on the list have already been carried out. One wonders what else might be on their list, yet to be carried out, for this pandemic.
———————
You stop doctors from using the drug in ways it is most likely to be effective (in outpatients at onset of illness). You prohibit use outside of situations you can control.
Situations that were controlled to show no benefit included 3 large, randomized, multi-center clinical trials (Recovery, Solidarity and REMAP-Covid), the kind of trials that are generally believed to yield the most reliable evidence. However, each of them used excessive hydroxychloroquine doses that were known to be toxic and may have been fatal in some cases; see my previous articles here and here.
You prevent or limit use in outpatients by controlling the supply of the drug, using different methods in different countries andstates. In NY state, by order of the governor, hydroxychloroquine could only be prescribed for hospitalized patients. France has issued a series of different regulations to limit prescribers from using it. France also changed the drugs’ status from over-the-counter to a drug requiring a prescription.
You play up the danger of the drug, emphasizing side effects that are very rare when the drug is used correctly. You make sure everyone has heard about theman who died after consuming hydroxychloroquine in the form of fish tank cleaner. Yet its toxicity at approved doses is minimal. Chloroquine was added to table salt in some regions in the 1950s as a malaria preventive, according to Professor Nicholas White in his study for the Recovery trial.
You limit clinical trials to hospitalized patients, instead of testing the drug in outpatients, early in the illness,when it is predicted to be most effective.
Finally, but not until May, you have Fauci’s NIAID conduct a trial in outpatients, using hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, but you only enroll 20 patients, after earlier planning for 2,000. Only half get the drugs. You reduce the duration of followup from 24 weeks to 13 days post treatment. This ridiculously small number of subjects assures meaningless results. Who pulled the plug on this trial?
You design clinical trials to givemuch too high a dose, ensuring the drug will cause harm in some subjects, sufficient to mask any possible beneficial effect. You make sure that trials in 400 hospitals in 35 countries (Solidarity) plus most hospitals in the UK (Recovery) use these dangerous doses, as well as additional sites in 13 countries (REMAP-Covid trial).
You design clinical trials tocollect almost no safety data, so any cause of death due to drug toxicity will be attributed to the disease instead of the drug.
You issue rules for use of the drug based on theresults of the UK Recovery study, which overdosed patients. Of course the Recovery results showed more deaths in the hydroxychloroquine arm, since they gave patients 2.4 g in the first 24 hrs, 800 mg/day thereafter. Furthermore, the UK has the 2nd highest death rate in the world for Covid-19 (Belgium is 1st), so simply conducting the trial in the UK may have contributed to the poor results.
You publish, in the world’s most-read medical journal, the Lancet, an observationalstudy from a huge worldwide database (96,000 Covid cases) that says use of chloroquine drugs caused significantly increased mortality. You make sure that all major media report on this result. This was said to be the nail in the coffin for hydroxychloroquine. Then you have 3 European countries announce they will not allow doctors to prescribe the drug.
You do your best to ride out any controversy, never admitting culpability. Even after hundreds of people renounced the Lancet’s observational study due to easily identified fabrications–the database used in the study did not exist, and the claimed numbers did not agree with known numbers of cases–the Lancet held firm for two weeks, serving to muddy the waters about the trial, until finally 3 of its 4 coauthors (but not the journal)retracted the study. But neither the authors nor the journal admitted responsibility. You make sure very few media report that the data were fabricated and the “study” was fraudulent. Even though the story was full of scandalous details, it went largely unnoticed. You make sure people believe the original story: that hydroxychloroquine routinely kills.
You ensure federal agencies like FDA and CDC hew to your desired policies. For example,FDA advised use only in hospitalized patients (too late) or in clinical trials (which are limited, are difficult to enroll in, or may use excessive doses). As of mid June, FDA advises patients and doctors to only give the drug to patients if they are in a clinical trial where, presumably, the results can be controlled.
Another example: you have FDA make unsubstantiated and false claims, such as: “Hospitalized patients were likely to have greater prospect of benefit (compared to ambulatory patients with mild illness)“ and claim the chloroquine drugs have a slow onset of action. If that were really true, they would not be used for acute attacks of malaria or in critically ill patients with Covid. (Disclosure: I once dosed myself with chloroquine for an acute attack of P. vivax malaria, and it worked very fast.). Providing no other treatment advice, even though providing such information is a large part of its mission, CDC instead refers clinicians to the NIH guidelines, discussed below.
Despite the fact that Belgium’s COVID treatment guidelines repeatedly mention that the doses of HCQ in the Recovery and Solidarity trials were 4 times the cumulative dose used in Belgium, you make sure the Belgian guidelines, paradoxically, only recommend use of HCQ within clinical trials.
You make sure to avoid funding/encouraging clinical trials that test drug combinations like hydroxychloroquine with zinc, with azithromycin, or with both, although there is ample clinical evidence that such combinations provide a cumulative benefit to patients. For example, oneof very few studies to look at this combination had no funding.
You have federal and UN agencies make false, illogical claims based on models (or invention) rather than human data. For example, you have the FDA state on June 15 that the doserequired to treat Covid is so high it is toxic, after the Recovery and Solidarity trials have been exposed for toxic dosing. This scientific double-speak gives some legal cover to the clinical trials that overdosed their patients. According to Denise Hinton, RN, the FDA’s Chief Scientist (yes, a registered nurse without scientific qualifications is the Chief Scientist at FDA), or some clumsy FDA wordsmith:
“Under the assumption that in vivo cellular accumulation is similar to that from the in vitro cell-based assays, the calculated free lung concentrations that would result from the EUA suggested dosing regimens are well below the in vitro EC50/EC90 values, making the antiviral effect against SARS-CoV-2 not likely achievable with the dosing regimens recommended in the EUA. The substantial increase in dosing that would be needed to increase the likelihood of an antiviral effect would not be acceptable due to toxicity concerns.”
You have a WHO report claim toxic doses are needed. This is nonsense since:
Toxicity was noted after only 3 days of treatment, during which 3.6 grams of chloroquine were administered. But the Solidarity (3.2 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days), Recovery (3.6 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days) and REMAP-Covid trials (3.6 grams of hydroxychloroquine in 3 days) continued overdosing patients until June, despite Brazil’s evidence of deaths by overdose.
Tellingly, JAMA editor Gordon Rubenfeld wrote in April, after the Brazilian study came out in JAMA, “if you are prescribing HCQ after these JAMA results, do yourself and your defense lawyer a favor. Document in your medical record that you informed the patient of the potential risks of HCQ including sudden death and its benefits (???).”
You create an NIH Guidelines committee for Covid treatment recommendations, in which16 members have or had financial entanglements with Gilead, maker of Remdesivir. The members were appointed by the Co-Chairs. Two of the three Co-Chairs are themselves financially entangled with Gilead. Are you surprised that their guidelines recommend specifically against the use of hydroxychloroquine and in favor of Remdesivir, and that they deem this the new “standard of care”?
You frighten doctors so they don’t prescribe hydroxychloroquine, if prescribing it is even allowed in their jurisdiction, because prescribing outside the newNIH “standard of care” leaves them open to malpractice lawsuits. You further tell them (through the FDA) they need to monitor a variety of lab parameters and patient EKGs when using the drug, although this was never advised before, which makes it very difficult to use the drug in outpatients. You have the European Medicines Agency issue similar warnings.
The only “safety” information collected during the trial was whether patients required oxygen, required a ventilator, or died. This effectively masked the adverse effects of the drugs tested.
I should mention that WHO’s initial plan for its Solidarity trial entirely omitted the chloroquine drugs, but they were added at the urging of participating nations. WHO’s fallback position appears to have been to use toxic doses.
You have theWHO pressure governments to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine.
You have theWHO pressure professional societies to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine.
You make sure that the most-consulted US medical encyclopedia, UptoDate,advises physicians to restrict hydroxychloroquine to only clinical trials, citing the FDA.
You convince the population that the crisis will be long-lasting. You have the 2nd richest man in the world, and biggest funder of the WHO, Bill Gates, keep repeating to the media megaphone that we cannot go back to normal until everyone has been vaccinated or there is a perfect drug. (The Gates Foundation helped design the WHO clinical trials, helped fund the Recovery trial, and Gates is heavily invested in Covid pharmaceuticals and vaccines.)
You have CDC (with help from FDA)prevent the purchase of coronavirus test kits from Germany, China, WHO, etc, and fail to produce a valid test kit themselves. The result was that during January and February, US cases could not be tested, and for several months thereafter insufficient and unreliable test kits made it impossible to track the epidemic and stop the spread.
You have trusted medical spokesmen lie to the public about the pandemic’s severity, so precautions weren’t taken when they might have been more effective and less long-lasting. Congress was repeatedly briefed about the pandemic in January and February, which scared several Congress members enough that they sold off large amounts of stock, risking insider trading charges. Senator Burr is one of them, currentlyunder investigation for major stock sales on February 13.
Yet Dr. Fauci told USA Today on February 17 that Americans should worry more about the flu than about coronavirus, the danger of which was “just miniscule.” Then on February 28, Drs. Fauci and Robert Redfield (CDC Director) wrote in the New England Journal:
“…the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.”
You destroy the reputation of respected physicians who stand in your way. Professor Didier Raoult and his team in Marseille have used hydroxychloroquine on over 4,000 patients, reporting a mortality rate of about 0.8%. (The mortality rate of patients given hydroxychloroquine in the Recovery trial was 25.7%.) Raoult is very famous for discovering over 100 different microorganisms, and finding the long-sought cause of Whipple’s Disease. With this reputation, Raoult apparently thought he could treat patients as he saw fit, which he has done, under great duress. Raoult was featured in a New York Times Magazine article, with his face on the magazine cover, on May 12, 2020. After describing his accomplishments, the Times very unfavorably discussed his personality, implied he conducted unethical trials without approval, and using anonymous sourcing produced a detailed hit piece. Raoult is now considered an unreliable crank in the US.
Physician and state senator Scott Jensen of Minnesota is being investigated by his state medical board due to anonymous complaints about ‘spreading misinformation’ and giving ‘reckless advice’ about COVID in interviews. Jensen was previously selected as “Family Physician of the Year” in his state. Now his medical license is at risk, not because of how he treated a patient, but for what he said outside of the office. Unprecedented.
UPDATE: Jensen was exonerated.
You have social media platforms ban content that does not agree with the desired narrative. As YouTube CEO and ex-wife of Google founder Sergey Brin, Susan Wojcickisaid,
“YouTube will ban any content containing medical advice that contradicts World Health Organisation (WHO) coronavirus recommendations. Anything that would go against World Health Organisation recommendations would be a violation of our policy.”
When your clinical trials are criticized for overdosing patients, you have Oxford-affiliated, Wellcome Trust-supported scientists at Mahidol University publish papers (aliterature review with modeling and a modeling study) purporting to show that the doses used were not toxic. You develop a new method to measure hydroxychloroquine in a handful of Recovery patients who were not poisoned. However, there are 2 problems you forgot with this approach:
The Brazilian data, including 16 deaths, extensive clinical information and documented ventricular arrhythmias, are much more persuasive than a theoretical model of hydroxychloroquine pharmacokinetics.
Either the drug is too toxic to use, even at normal doses, for a life-threatening disease, or even extremely high doses are safe. You can’t have it both ways.
Oxford is the institution running the Recovery trial, and invented a Covid vaccine that already has 400 million doses on order. The Wellcome Trust funded the Recovery trial.
You change your trial’s primary outcome measures after the trials have started, in order to prevent detection of drug-induced deaths (Recovery) or to make your drug appear to have efficacy (NIAID Remdesivir trial).
You stop manufacturers from supplying the drug. Shortly after the fraudulent Lancetpaper came out, Sanofi announced it would no longer supply the drug for use with Covid, and would halt its two hydroxychloroquine clinical trials. One of the cancelled Sanofi trials was expected to test 210 outpatients early in the course of disease. The trial remains suspended at the time of writing, while the Lancet paper was retracted 13 days after publication. You surely don’t want a trial of hydroxychloroquine treatment early in the disease, since it might show an excellent effect.
Then Sanofi started collecting information on all off-label use of hydroxychloroquine in New Zealand and Australia. Why is Sanofi, a drug manufacturing company, becoming a surveillance/enforcement mechanism intended to frighten medical providers from using the drug for Covid, which use is by definition “off label.” Sanofi alternatively suggests one may report (anonymously or not) others’ off-label use to New Zealand’s Pharmacovigilance Center or the Australian equivalent.
And see this: Novartis will supply HCQ only under certain conditions, and halted its HCQ trial due to lack of enrollments, although enrollment was not an issue for its other COVID trials.
http://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/covid-19-lhydroxychloroquine-marche-une-preuve-irrefutable)
You reverse an old trick of clinical trials, to mask benefit of hydroxychloroquine. The trick was to replace the saline placebo with a substance that is being used by many cliniciansand in many trials against Covid, thus by comparison likely to reduce the positive effect of your tested medication. This was done in trials both at NYU and at University of Washington, using vitamin C or vitamin C and folate respectively as placebos. You have the chief medical officers of Wales, England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and the director of the UK’s National Health Service, write to UK doctors, a) urging them to enroll their Covid patients in one of 3 national clinical trials, two of which greatly overdosed patients with hydroxychloroquine, and b) stopping their use of “off license treatments” outside of a trial. Yet again, we encounter a veiled threat against clinicians actually attempting to treat the primary SARS-Cov-2 infection. The chief doctors wrote:
While it is for every individual clinician to make prescribing decisions, we strongly discourage the use of off-licence treatments outside of a trial, where participation in a trial is possible… Any treatment given for coronavirus other than general supportive care, treatment for underlying conditions, and antibiotics for secondary bacterial complications, should currently be as part of a trial, where that is possible.”
You have a state Pharmacy Board refuse to dispense hydroxychloroquine outside of clinical trialson June 15, citing the FDA recommendation for use only in trials. You issue this new regulation on the same day that FDA publishes its recommendation, indicating prior coordination. But when your regulation is exposed on July 14, you immediately rescind it. You have the IMF offer rapid financing to Belarus, but only if it follows the recommended model of Covid responseand imposes quarantines, isolation and curfews. A group of doctors went to Washington DC July 27-28. They called themselves “America’s Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference and livestream talks about the Covid-19 pandemic as well as about the need for physicians to be able to prescribe HCQ freely. While the media sparsely attended the press conference, the livestream got millions of views. And within hours, their livestream was bannedby Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. Twitter was said to additionally ban comments about its ban. Then Squarespace took down the Frontline Doctors’ website.
Today, Bitchute is hosting their press conference. So is Brighteon. In those media that describe what happened, the group is tarred for providing misinformation.
After the HCQ issue got so much attention on social media, you impose another ban on July 29 on the prescribing of HCQ for Covid, starting July 30 in Ohio, using its Pharmacy Board to dictate to physicians what they may not prescribe. (A repeat of #35 in a different state.)
This ban got so much attention that the Ohio Governor (who must have initially supported it) rescinded it the next morning. July 30, saying he agrees with FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn, who said in a July 30 interview that the prescribing of HCQ is between a doctor and patient.
After massive attention to the banning of the videos posted by the physician group ‘America’s Frontline Physicians’ and its website, you make intense efforts to discredit the physicians involved.
MedPageToday claimed it “could find no evidence that any of the speakers worked in hospitals with significant numbers of COVID-19 patients.” But the doctors claimed they used the drug early and prevented hospitalizations and deaths. With over 4.4 million Americans diagnosed with Covid, what doctor hasn’t seen a Covid patient?
USAT headlined: ‘America’s Frontline Doctors’ may be real doctors, but experts say they don’t know what they’re talking about.
You have USA Today review and publish detailed information on the licenses, practice locations and malpractice histories of the doctors who spoke out. USAT reporters claim these doctors are not experts and lack knowledge about the use of HCQ in Covid-19, despite the fact that most work in primary care, urgent care or emergency medicine and report using the drug for Covid. Yet no one asks how many years ago ‘expert’ Fauci last treated a patient? Expert Birx’ medical license expired in 2014, so she hasn’t treated a Covid patient either.
Hydroxychloroquine use is truly the wedge issue for understanding and turning around the pandemic. If hydroxychloroquine works reasonably well as a prophylactic and treatment for Covid-19, it could potentially end the seriousness of the pandemic and return us to life as we knew it. You must make use of the levers of government, mainstream media and social media to stop that from happening.
So, just in case doctors thought the Frontline Doctors’ video, or a new study from Spain showing the drug’s usefulness meant they should use hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid, you must act fast. You use Representatives at a Congressional health subcommittee hearing on July 29 to threaten doctors about the use of the drug last April in veterans who were nursing home patients. Per the Washington Post:
“doctors at the 238-bed nursing home dosed [30] patients with what came to be called a “covid cocktail” for more than two weeks in April, often over the objections of nurses and without the full knowledge of residents’ families. At least 11 residents received the drug even though they had not been tested for covid-19, The Post found.”
I have treated patients in nursing homes, and one rarely discusses medication changes with family, unless the patient is seriously ill. When nursing home residents were dying like flies last April, when tests were hard to come by and confirmed diagnoses few and far between, doctors used this medicine to try to prevent nursing home deaths during a pandemic. And now they are being scapegoated for doing so.
The WaPo article does not even tell us whether the patients survived, thrived or were harmed. The article hardly makes sense. Its only purpose is to blacken the drug and the physicians who use it.
You use state Medical Licensing Boards tothreaten doctors who claim there is a cure for Covid-19.
You have Dr. Faucidiscredit published observational studies that show benefit during a Congressional hearing, demanding randomized controlled trials. Fauci never tells the Committee he has cancelled the one randomized controlled trial of HCQ that his agency, NIAID, was supposed to conduct on HCQ. NIAID claimed that it could not enroll enough subjects, and was cancelled after only 20 were enrolled. However, Fauci told the Committee that 250,000 Americans have shown interest in participating in trials of a Covid vaccine. It is difficult to believe there was extreme lack of interest in a treatment trial, and such massive interest in a vaccine trial.
Doctors who wrote studies showing benefit (50% mortality reduction) defended their work from Fauci’s criticism.
Youerode the doctor’s primary responsibility to the patient, replacing it with the need to perform clinical research. This is the first time I have ever heard such a thing: research physicians are pressuring frontline doctors not to veer from protocol-determined treatment, even when patients enrolled in treatment trials are at risk of death.
You mention the “stellar” Recovery trial in the August 5NY Times, but avoid any hint that its hydroxychloroquine arm gave patients a toxic dose.
Source: https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-08-14--Dr. Fauci running ‘misinformation campaign’ against hydroxychloroquine

Dr. Harvey Risch , a noted Yale epidemiologist , has accused White House coronavirus task force member Dr. Anthony Fauci of waging a “ misinformation campaign ” against the drug hydroxychloroquine , claiming the medication has shown consistently encouraging results in treating COVID-19 when used properly .
Hydroxychloroquine has been at the center of a protracted political debate since March , when President Trump cited the drug as a promising possible treatment for the novel coronavirus .
HCQ has long been used by doctors to treat malaria along with other syndromes such as arthritis and lupus .
The World Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , while nearly five million Americans hold prescriptions for it .
Since Trump ’ s speculative endorsement of the drug , media outlets and medical officials have for several months aggressively promoted various medical trials that have determined the drug has no effectiveness in fighting COVID-19 ; many commentators have also insisted , in spite of the drug ’ s decades-long safe track record , that it is too dangerous to be used to cure the disease .
Among the drug ’ s critics has been Fauci .
In March , the longtime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Infection Diseases dismissed claims of HCQ ’ s effectiveness as “ anecdotal ” and has periodically voiced that skepticism over the course of the pandemic .
On Tuesday during an interview on “ Good Morning America , ” Fauci further downplayed the drug ’ s purported benefit , claiming that “ the overwhelming prevailing clinical trials that have looked at the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine have indicated that it is not effective in [ treating ] coronavirus disease.
” Drug is ‘ the key to defeating COVID-19 , ’ says infectious disease expert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ professor of epidemiology and the director of Yale ’ s Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory , has been pushing for the drug ’ s use in the fight against the coronavirus for months .
Last week in a Newsweek op-ed he called HCQ “ the key to defeating COVID-19 , ” claiming its use — particularly when administered with one of two antibiotics and the nutritional supplement zinc — has been “ shown to be highly effective ” in treating high-risk coronavirus patients .
On Tuesday , Risch went further , charging in an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is perpetrating a “ misinformation campaign ” in his opposition to the drug .
Fauci “ has been maintaining a studious position that only randomized controlled trial evidence has any value , ” Risch said , “ and everything else he calls anecdotal.
” Randomized controlled trials have been referred to as “ the gold standard ” of clinical research experiments ; Fauci last month lamented the “ paucity ” of such trials regarding COVID-19 cures .
But Risch said numerous other types of studies have significant practical value in determining effective courses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2017 New England Journal of Medicine article by former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Tom Frieden , one in which the author argued that randomized controlled trials have “ substantial limitations ” and that “ many other data sources can provide valid evidence for clinical and public health action .
Five key factors for successful HCQ treatment , Risch says Fauci ’ s office did not respond to requests for comment on Risch ’ s claims about the drug ’ s effectiveness and Fauci ’ s assessment of it .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ early treatment of ( b ) high-risk ( c ) outpatients with ( d ) HCQ plus zinc , [ azithromycin ] , doxycycline etc .
for ( e ) hospitalization or mortality outcomes , ” Risch said .
“ Dr .
Fauci , in citing all of the studies without qualification , smeared all over points ( a ) - ( e ) .
” Risch said opponents of HCQ have been arguing that the drug “ doesn ’ t work on patients near death in ventilators and therefore we can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outpatient settings.
” “ Why would you even entertain invoking a study on severely sick patients to bear on the efficacy of outpatients ?
” he asked .
Risch provided Just the News with several studies and reports he said demonstrated the drug ’ s effectiveness .
One report out of India earlier this month stated that the drug appeared effective in reducing the virility of the disease , with patients who took larger doses apparently less likely to spread it to close contacts .
One scholarly article published in Travel Medicine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers in Marseille , France , who treated over 3,100 patients with a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin .
That treatment regimen was “ associated with a decreased risk of transfer to ICU or death … decreased risk of hospitalization ≥10 days … and shorter duration of viral shedding , ” the researchers wrote .
Researchers in Brazil , meanwhile , said that patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were less likely to be hospitalized , particularly the earlier the treatment was started .
Risch also shared an open letter written in late @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zelenko in which the doctor said he had observed “ very positive results ” by treating patients with hydroxychloroquine , azithromycin and zinc .
Of 405 patients treated with that regimen , Zelenko wrote , two died , six were hospitalized , and four were intubated .
In a July 20 academic letter , Risch ultimately cited a total of 12 studies he said showed a positive association with HCQ use and improved mortality outcomes , including one trial in New York City concluding that “ hydroxychloroquine use was associated with decreased in-hospital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of treating sicker patients with the drug “ favors a poorer outcome for the medication.
” “ The evidence is when you limit studies to just the five conditions outlined in my first email , [ the drug ] shows benefits in those strict conditions , ” Risch said .
RCTs have indicated the drug is not effective at COVID-19 Numerous randomized controlled trials have indeed suggested that hydroxychloroquine has little to no effect in treating coronavirus .
One such study , the results of which were published last month , utilized a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ across the United States and parts of Canada ” testing whether or not the drug could work as “ postexposure prophylaxis.
” Though “ no serious adverse reactions were reported ” by those taking the drug , hydroxychloroquine “ did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection ” when used in that manner .
Those conclusions would seem to dispute Risch ’ s claims that the drug is most effective at counteracting COVID-19 when used early , though the researchers themselves acknowledged the significant limitations of their own study : Just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients in the study actually confirmed that diagnosis with a laboratory test .
“ Given the small number of PCR tests , ” the researchers state at one point , “ it remains theoretically possible that hydroxychloroquine therapy limits proven infection.
” Two other randomized controlled studies , one published in the medical journal BMJ in May and one conducted by the U.K. ’ s Nuffield Health System concluded that hydroxychloroquine use “ did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion than standard of care alone ” and that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in the studied patient populations .
Notably , both of those studies utilized patients who had been hospitalized for COVID-19 rather than those at the earlier stages of the disease ; according to Risch , the drug is less effective under those conditions and should be given at the earliest point possible in the disease ’ s progression , outside of a hospital setting .
“ All we want is to show benefit under those conditions , ” Risch told Just the News .
“ We don ’ t need to use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whole point is to keep patients out of the hospital.
” • Report on Indian successes in treating with HCQ Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

Yale epidemiologist: Dr. Fauci running ‘misinformation campaign’ against hydroxychloroquine
Accuses prominent doctor of harboring ‘total anti-science viewpoint.’
By Daniel Payne,
Dr. Harvey Risch, a noted Yale epidemiologist, has accused White House coronavirus task force member Dr. Anthony Fauci of waging a “misinformation campaign” against the drug hydroxychloroquine, claiming the medication has shown consistently encouraging results in treating COVID-19 when used properly.
Hydroxychloroquine has been at the center of a protracted political debate since March, when President Trump cited the drug as a promising possible treatment for the novel coronavirus. HCQ has long been used by doctors to treat malaria along with other syndromes such as arthritis and lupus. The World Health Organization lists it as an essential medicine, while nearly five million Americans hold prescriptions for it.
Since Trump’s speculative endorsement of the drug, media outlets and medical officials have for several months aggressively promoted various medical trials that have determined the drug has no effectiveness in fighting COVID-19; many commentators have also insisted, in spite of the drug’s decades-long safe track record, that it is too dangerous to be used to cure the disease.
Among the drug’s critics has been Fauci. In March, the longtime director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infection Diseases dismissed claims of HCQ’s effectiveness as “anecdotal” and has periodically voiced that skepticism over the course of the pandemic.
On Tuesday during an interview on “Good Morning America,” Fauci further downplayed the drug’s purported benefit, claiming that “the overwhelming prevailing clinical trials that have looked at the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine have indicated that it is not effective in [treating] coronavirus disease.”
Drug is ‘the key to defeating COVID-19,’ says infectious disease expert
Risch, however, is sharply criticizing Fauci’s approach to evaluating the drug’s effectiveness, arguing that repeated trials and tests have shown that it is markedly effective at treating COVID-19 so long as it is administered properly.
Risch (Pictured here), a professor of epidemiology and the director of Yale’s Molecular Cancer Epidemiology Laboratory, has been pushing for the drug’s use in the fight against the coronavirus for months. Last week in a Newsweek op-ed he called HCQ “the key to defeating COVID-19,” claiming its use — particularly when administered with one of two antibiotics and the nutritional supplement zinc — has been “shown to be highly effective” in treating high-risk coronavirus patients.
On Tuesday, Risch went further, charging in an interview with Just the News that Fauci is perpetrating a “misinformation campaign” in his opposition to the drug.
Fauci “has been maintaining a studious position that only randomized controlled trial evidence has any value,” Risch said, “and everything else he calls anecdotal.”
Randomized controlled trials have been referred to as “the gold standard” of clinical research experiments; Fauci last month lamented the “paucity” of such trials regarding COVID-19 cures. But Risch said numerous other types of studies have significant practical value in determining effective courses of medical treatment.
Risch shared a 2017 New England Journal of Medicine article by former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Tom Frieden, one in which the author argued that randomized controlled trials have “substantial limitations” and that “many other data sources can provide valid evidence for clinical and public health action.
Five key factors for successful HCQ treatment, Risch says
Fauci’s office did not respond to requests for comment on Risch’s claims about the drug’s effectiveness and Fauci’s assessment of it.
Risch argued that, while hydroxychloroquine is not a universally effective treatment, it has shown marked and repeated success when used in appropriate cases and at appropriate points of disease progression.
“The crucial issues are (a) early treatment of (b) high-risk (c) outpatients with (d) HCQ plus zinc, [azithromycin], doxycycline etc. for (e) hospitalization or mortality outcomes,” Risch said. “Dr. Fauci, in citing all of the studies without qualification, smeared all over points (a)-(e).”
Risch said opponents of HCQ have been arguing that the drug “doesn’t work on patients near death in ventilators and therefore we can’t use it on healthier patients in outpatient settings.”
“Why would you even entertain invoking a study on severely sick patients to bear on the efficacy of outpatients?” he asked.
Risch provided Just the News with several studies and reports he said demonstrated the drug’s effectiveness. One report out of India earlier this month stated that the drug appeared effective in reducing the virility of the disease, with patients who took larger doses apparently less likely to spread it to close contacts.
One scholarly article published in Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease last month detailed experiments by researchers in Marseille, France, who treated over 3,100 patients with a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. That treatment regimen was “associated with a decreased risk of transfer to ICU or death … decreased risk of hospitalization ≥10 days … and shorter duration of viral shedding,” the researchers wrote.
(That study appeared to use hospitalized patients as trial subjects, but Risch said that the facility functions as both an inpatient ward and a day clinic. “During the study, HCQ was not legal to prescribe for outpatients,” he said. “So the hospital admitted patients for the day, did exams etc. and gave them the HCQ prescriptions, then they went home. Only a small number were actually hospitalized. So in reality they were outpatients.”)
Researchers in Brazil, meanwhile, said that patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were less likely to be hospitalized, particularly the earlier the treatment was started. Risch also shared an open letter written in late April by upstate New York doctor Vladimir Zelenko in which the doctor said he had observed “very positive results” by treating patients with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc. Of 405 patients treated with that regimen, Zelenko wrote, two died, six were hospitalized, and four were intubated.
In a July 20 academic letter, Risch ultimately cited a total of 12 studies he said showed a positive association with HCQ use and improved mortality outcomes, including one trial in New York City concluding that “hydroxychloroquine use was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality.”
Risch said that the practice of treating sicker patients with the drug “favors a poorer outcome for the medication.”
“The evidence is when you limit studies to just the five conditions outlined in my first email, [the drug] shows benefits in those strict conditions,” Risch said.
RCTs have indicated the drug is not effective at COVID-19
Numerous randomized controlled trials have indeed suggested that hydroxychloroquine has little to no effect in treating coronavirus.
One such study, the results of which were published last month, utilized a “randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across the United States and parts of Canada” testing whether or not the drug could work as “postexposure prophylaxis.” Though “no serious adverse reactions were reported” by those taking the drug, hydroxychloroquine “did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection” when used in that manner.
Those conclusions would seem to dispute Risch’s claims that the drug is most effective at counteracting COVID-19 when used early, though the researchers themselves acknowledged the significant limitations of their own study: Just 18% of those classified as COVID patients in the study actually confirmed that diagnosis with a laboratory test. “Given the small number of PCR tests,” the researchers state at one point, “it remains theoretically possible that hydroxychloroquine therapy limits proven infection.”
Two other randomized controlled studies, one published in the medical journal BMJ in May and one conducted by the U.K.’s Nuffield Health System concluded that hydroxychloroquine use “did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion than standard of care alone” and that there was “no beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine” in the studied patient populations.
Notably, both of those studies utilized patients who had been hospitalized for COVID-19 rather than those at the earlier stages of the disease; according to Risch, the drug is less effective under those conditions and should be given at the earliest point possible in the disease’s progression, outside of a hospital setting.
“All we want is to show benefit under those conditions,” Risch told Just the News. “We don’t need to use this medication in the hospital because the whole point is to keep patients out of the hospital.”
_________
THE FACTS INSIDE OUR REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK
Links
.
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-08-14--Peggy Hall & How One California County Overturned Mask Mandates

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage Disclaimer : We at Prepare for @ @ @ @ @ you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem @ @ @ @ @ views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , @ @ @ @ @ by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with @ @ @ @ @ read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
@ @ @ @ @ own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help @ @ @ @ @ and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our @ @ @ @ @ awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material @ @

https://youtu.be/SHALXqFz6vk
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage