prepareforchange--2020-01-26--STUDY SAYS BPA IS CAUSING SEVERE HORMONE IMBALANCES IN 80% OF TEENS

According to new research , four out of five teenagers in the UK are having their hormones disrupted by chemicals found in plastics .
Experts believe that the chemical responsible for these widespread hormone issues is bisphenol A , which is more commonly known as BPA .
This chemical is often used to make plastics , and can be found in products that come into contact with food .
Since this chemical can mimic the sex hormone estrogen , it has been found to lower sperm count in men .
The chemical has also been linked to a variety of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A study was recently conducted at Exeter University , where a team of researchers tested the blood and urine of 94 different teens between the ages of 17 and 19 for a number of toxins and chemicals .
The researchers found that roughly 80 percent of the teens had these dangerous chemicals in their bodies .
The study was led by ecotoxicology professor Tamara Galloway , who is convinced by the growing body of evidence that exposure to BPA has serious health risks .
The researchers noted that toxin levels decreased for teens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fresh produce , and thus less plastic contamination .
BPA is entirely legal in the UK , and while it is somewhat regulated in the United States , it still presents a serious threat .
In 2012 , the FDA banned the chemical in baby products , but still allowed it in items marketed to adults .
Meanwhile , The European Chemicals Agency ( ECA ) recently moved to restrict the use of the chemical by 2020 .
The agency pointed to BPA ’ s ability to disrupt the endocrine system , saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ properties , which cause probable serious effects to human health.
” The ECA noted that these side effects include infertility and aggression in girls as young as three .
There is still a great deal of controversy surrounding BPA , with experts at odds about whether or not the chemical is harmful at the levels currently found in most products .
Defenders of BPA use the argument that “ the dose makes the poison ” to suggest that BPA is safe at low levels .
However , studies like the one conducted at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chemical is linked to numerous health problems .
Earlier this year , Truth Theory reported on a disturbing study which found that we are absorbing tens of thousands of plastic particles each year , just in the food we eat and the air that we breathe .
It was also noted in the study , that drinking a lot of bottled water can nearly double the presence of toxins in our bodies .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

By John Vibes,
According to new research, four out of five teenagers in the UK are having their hormones disrupted by chemicals found in plastics. Experts believe that the chemical responsible for these widespread hormone issues is bisphenol A, which is more commonly known as BPA. This chemical is often used to make plastics, and can be found in products that come into contact with food.
Since this chemical can mimic the sex hormone estrogen, it has been found to lower sperm count in men. The chemical has also been linked to a variety of illnesses including breast and prostate cancer.
A study was recently conducted at Exeter University, where a team of researchers tested the blood and urine of 94 different teens between the ages of 17 and 19 for a number of toxins and chemicals. The researchers found that roughly 80 percent of the teens had these dangerous chemicals in their bodies.
The study was led by ecotoxicology professor Tamara Galloway, who is convinced by the growing body of evidence that exposure to BPA has serious health risks.
The researchers noted that toxin levels decreased for teens who changed their diet to include more fresh produce, and thus less plastic contamination.
BPA is entirely legal in the UK, and while it is somewhat regulated in the United States, it still presents a serious threat. In 2012, the FDA banned the chemical in baby products, but still allowed it in items marketed to adults. Meanwhile, The European Chemicals Agency (ECA) recently moved to restrict the use of the chemical by 2020.
The agency pointed to BPA’s ability to disrupt the endocrine system, saying that the chemical, has “endocrine-disrupting properties, which cause probable serious effects to human health.” The ECA noted that these side effects include infertility and aggression in girls as young as three.
There is still a great deal of controversy surrounding BPA, with experts at odds about whether or not the chemical is harmful at the levels currently found in most products. Defenders of BPA use the argument that “the dose makes the poison” to suggest that BPA is safe at low levels. However, studies like the one conducted at Exeter University continue to prove that this chemical is linked to numerous health problems.
Earlier this year, Truth Theory reported on a disturbing study which found that we are absorbing tens of thousands of plastic particles each year, just in the food we eat and the air that we breathe. It was also noted in the study, that drinking a lot of bottled water can nearly double the presence of toxins in our bodies.
Source: https://truththeory.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-01-26--ICC judges dash hopes for swift probe of Israeli war crimes

Judges at the International Criminal Court have just knocked back any hopes for an expeditious investigation of war crimes in Palestine .
Meanwhile , Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is using a Holocaust forum in Jerusalem this week to recruit world leaders in his campaign against the court .
A pre-trial chamber on Tuesday issued a decision admonishing chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda for exceeding the page limit in her request for a ruling on court jurisdiction in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip .
Israel , which effectively controls those territories , is not a signatory to the Rome @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the International Criminal Court .
The state vehemently rejects ICC jurisdiction in the West Bank and Gaza .
The State of Palestine , which petitioned the ICC to investigate Israel , is a signatory to the Rome Statute but does not have sovereignty over the West Bank and Gaza , which are occupied by Israel .
Bensouda ’ s request for a ruling on jurisdiction was filed on 20 December , when the chief prosecutor announced the conclusion of her preliminary examination into the situation in Palestine , which began in January 2015 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though court regulations limit such requests to 30 pages .
On 23 December , Bensouda filed supplementary material – legal arguments published by the Israeli government rejecting court jurisdiction – tacking on an additional 50 pages .
Tuesday ’ s decision issued by the pre-trial chamber accepts Bensouda ’ s request to extend the number of pages she ’ s permitted to submit to 110 , given the “ nature , novelty and complexity ” regarding the issue of court jurisdiction in Palestine .
But the judges are requiring that Bensouda resubmit her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ further delaying the launch of any war crimes investigation .
The same pre-trial chamber will determine whether the court has jurisdiction to prosecute war crimes in the West Bank and Gaza .
Though an investigation has been recommended by Bensouda , the judges could prevent one from happening .
This uncertainty has not stopped Israel from going on the offensive against the court , with its leaders accusing it of anti-Semitism .
Netanyahu called for an uprising against the court during an interview with a major evangelical Christian television network aired in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to call for sanctions against the court .
“ They ’ re basically on a full-frontal attack on the democracies , both on the democracies ’ right to defend themselves , and on Israel ’ s right , the Jewish people ’ s right , to live in their ancestral homeland , ” Netanyahu said .
He invoked the Holocaust and said that “ attempts to destroy the Jewish people have not disappeared .
Iran openly declares every day that it wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.
” Netanyahu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Forum in Jerusalem on Thursday to push world leaders to publicly back Israel ’ s position against International Criminal Court jurisdiction .
Dozens of world leaders are expected to participate in the forum commemorating the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp .
The Tel Aviv daily Haaretz described it as “ the largest diplomatic delegation ever to visit Israel , except for the funerals of former prime ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres.
” The paper reported that “ in recent months , Israel has been carrying out a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stance ” against International Criminal Court jurisdiction in the West Bank and Gaza Strip .
“ Netanyahu has contacted several world leaders , but only a few have accepted his request or indicated that they might , ” Haaretz added .
The US has long opposed any investigation of Israel , or American forces in Afghanistan , threatening court figures with sanctions .
Early last year it revoked Bensouda ’ s entry visa .
Australia said it was “ concerned ” over Bensouda ’ s recommendation for a war crimes investigation and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Palestine .
The government of Hungary stated that Israel ’ s “ position with regard to the lack of jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in the given case is justified.
” Germany was more circumspect , deferring to court process , while Canada said that “ there is no Palestinian state and therefore we do not recognize its joining international treaties.
” No other states have responded to Netanyahu ’ s request , according to Haaretz .
Netanyahu vowed on Tuesday to unilaterally annex all Israeli settlements in the West Bank if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was made by the prime minister after his rival Benny Gantz pledged to annex the Jordan Valley of the West Bank with the agreement of the international community .
Netanyahu ’ s previous pledges to annex swathes of the West Bank , including the Jordan Valley , are highlighted in the International Criminal Court ’ s request for a ruling on jurisdiction .
“ Despite the clear and enduring calls that Israel cease activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory deemed contrary to international law , there is no indication that they will end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the contrary , there are indications that they may not only continue , but that Israel may seek to annex those territories , ” Bensouda adds .
“ In August and September 2019 , Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to annex large parts of the West Bank if re-elected.
” Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix @ @ @ @ @

Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged to annex all West Bank settlements to Israel if he wins the next elections. ( Ryan Rodrick Beiler / Active Stills)
By Maureen Clare Murphy,
Judges at the International Criminal Court have just knocked back any hopes for an expeditious investigation of war crimes in Palestine.
Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is using a Holocaust forum in Jerusalem this week to recruit world leaders in his campaign against the court.
A pre-trial chamber on Tuesday issued a decision admonishing chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda for exceeding the page limit in her request for a ruling on court jurisdiction in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Israel, which effectively controls those territories, is not a signatory to the Rome Statute and thus not a member of the International Criminal Court. The state vehemently rejects ICC jurisdiction in the West Bank and Gaza.
The State of Palestine, which petitioned the ICC to investigate Israel, is a signatory to the Rome Statute but does not have sovereignty over the West Bank and Gaza, which are occupied by Israel.
Bensouda’s request for a ruling on jurisdiction was filed on 20 December, when the chief prosecutor announced the conclusion of her preliminary examination into the situation in Palestine, which began in January 2015.
That filing totaled 112 pages, though court regulations limit such requests to 30 pages. On 23 December, Bensouda filed supplementary material – legal arguments published by the Israeli government rejecting court jurisdiction – tacking on an additional 50 pages.
Tuesday’s decision issued by the pre-trial chamber accepts Bensouda’s request to extend the number of pages she’s permitted to submit to 110, given the “nature, novelty and complexity” regarding the issue of court jurisdiction in Palestine.
But the judges are requiring that Bensouda resubmit her request for a ruling on jurisdiction, further delaying the launch of any war crimes investigation.
The same pre-trial chamber will determine whether the court has jurisdiction to prosecute war crimes in the West Bank and Gaza. Though an investigation has been recommended by Bensouda, the judges could prevent one from happening.
Netanyahu campaigns against court
This uncertainty has not stopped Israel from going on the offensive against the court, with its leaders accusing it of anti-Semitism.
Netanyahu called for an uprising against the court during an interview with a major evangelical Christian television network aired in the US this week.
Netanyahu urged viewers to call for sanctions against the court.
“They’re basically on a full-frontal attack on the democracies, both on the democracies’ right to defend themselves, and on Israel’s right, the Jewish people’s right, to live in their ancestral homeland,” Netanyahu said.
He invoked the Holocaust and said that “attempts to destroy the Jewish people have not disappeared. Iran openly declares every day that it wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.”
Netanyahu is also using the Fifth World Holocaust Forum in Jerusalem on Thursday to push world leaders to publicly back Israel’s position against International Criminal Court jurisdiction.
Dozens of world leaders are expected to participate in the forum commemorating the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp.
The Tel Aviv daily Haaretz described it as “the largest diplomatic delegation ever to visit Israel, except for the funerals of former prime ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres.”
The paper reported that “in recent months, Israel has been carrying out a campaign to garner political support for its stance” against International Criminal Court jurisdiction in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
“Netanyahu has contacted several world leaders, but only a few have accepted his request or indicated that they might,” Haaretz added.
The US has long opposed any investigation of Israel, or American forces in Afghanistan, threatening court figures with sanctions. Early last year it revoked Bensouda’s entry visa.
Australia said it was “concerned” over Bensouda’s recommendation for a war crimes investigation and that it does not recognize the State of Palestine.
The government of Hungary stated that Israel’s “position with regard to the lack of jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in the given case is justified.”
Germany was more circumspect, deferring to court process, while Canada said that “there is no Palestinian state and therefore we do not recognize its joining international treaties.”
No other states have responded to Netanyahu’s request, according to Haaretz.
Netanyahu doubles down on war crimes
Netanyahu vowed on Tuesday to unilaterally annex all Israeli settlements in the West Bank if he wins upcoming elections.
The promise was made by the prime minister after his rival Benny Gantz pledged to annex the Jordan Valley of the West Bank with the agreement of the international community.
Netanyahu’s previous pledges to annex swathes of the West Bank, including the Jordan Valley, are highlighted in the International Criminal Court’s request for a ruling on jurisdiction.
“Despite the clear and enduring calls that Israel cease activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory deemed contrary to international law, there is no indication that they will end,” she states.
“To the contrary, there are indications that they may not only continue, but that Israel may seek to annex those territories,” Bensouda adds.
“In August and September 2019, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to annex large parts of the West Bank if re-elected.”
Source: https://electronicintifada.net
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-01-26--Disney Channel Releasing New Program For Children That Glorifies Demons, Witchcraft, And Satan

In accordance with its stated agenda of making the “ demon realm feel like home , ” The Disney Channel is releasing a new program for children called “ The Owl House ” that glorifies demons , witchcraft , and hell .
According to Disney , the series centers around a teenage girl named Luz who “ discovers a portal to another realm where humans are not well-liked , and she must disguise herself in order to fit in at witch school.
” This realm , the kids programming empire says , is referred to as “ Demon town , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ live with a demon named Eda the Owl Lady who ’ s “ the most powerful witch on the Boiling Iles.
” Luz ’ s character decides during one of the earlier episodes of the show that , “ Someday , I ’ m going to be just like her ” – meaning Luz wants to grow up not to be an honorable human woman , but rather a demon witch like Eda .
The purpose of this storyline , of course , is to teach children whose parents let them watch The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is passé , and that it ’ s “ cool ” to discover portals that carry you off to hell to live with demons , witches , and even Satan himself .
Read & share : Top 10 Events Of 2019 That Indicate The Rise Of Satanism “ Folks , if you think this latest ‘ Owl House ’ show is just ‘ fantasy and fun ’ think again , ” reads a commentary written by Deborah Bunting for CBN .
“ The show tries to portray witchcraft as a positive tool to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to explains .
“ That ’ s similar to what real-life witches have been promoting over the past few years as they ’ ve been putting hexes on President Trump and others in order to fight for their beliefs.
” Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

From HumansAreFree.com:
In accordance with its stated agenda of making the “demon realm feel like home,” The Disney Channel is releasing a new program for children called “The Owl House” that glorifies demons, witchcraft, and hell.
According to Disney, the series centers around a teenage girl named Luz who “discovers a portal to another realm where humans are not well-liked, and she must disguise herself in order to fit in at witch school.”
This realm, the kids programming empire says, is referred to as “Demon town,” and in it Luz decides to live with a demon named Eda the Owl Lady who’s “the most powerful witch on the Boiling Iles.”
Luz’s character decides during one of the earlier episodes of the show that, “Someday, I’m going to be just like her” – meaning Luz wants to grow up not to be an honorable human woman, but rather a demon witch like Eda.
The purpose of this storyline, of course, is to teach children whose parents let them watch The Disney Channel that being normal human beings is passé, and that it’s “cool” to discover portals that carry you off to hell to live with demons, witches, and even Satan himself.
Read & share: Top 10 Events Of 2019 That Indicate The Rise Of Satanism
“Folks, if you think this latest ‘Owl House’ show is just ‘fantasy and fun’ think again,” reads a commentary written by Deborah Bunting for CBN.
“The show tries to portray witchcraft as a positive tool to fight evil,” she goes on to explains.
“That’s similar to what real-life witches have been promoting over the past few years as they’ve been putting hexes on President Trump and others in order to fight for their beliefs.”
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-01-27--People no longer believe working hard will lead to a better life, survey shows

A growing sense of inequality is undermining trust in both society ’ s institutions and capitalism , according to a long-running global survey .
The 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer – now in its 20th year – has found many people no longer believe working hard will give them a better life .
Despite strong economic performance , a majority of respondents in every developed market do not believe they will be better off in five years ’ time .
This means that economic growth no longer appears to drive trust , at least in developed markets – upending the conventional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a trust paradox , ” said Richard Edelman , CEO of Edelman .
“ Since we began measuring trust 20 years ago , economic growth has fostered rising trust .
This continues in Asia and the Middle East but not in developed markets , where national income inequality is now the more important factor .
Fears are stifling hope , and long-held assumptions about hard work leading to upward mobility are now invalid .
Skip Animated GifFireFox NVDA users – To access the following content , press ‘ M ’ to enter the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between elites and the public Fifty-six per cent of the surveyed global population said capitalism in its current form does more harm than good in the world .
Most employees ( 83 percent ) globally are worried about job loss due to automation , a looming recession , lack of training , cheaper foreign competition , immigration and the gig economy .
Fifty-seven percent of respondents worry about losing the respect and dignity they once enjoyed in their country .
Nearly two in three feel the pace of technological change is too fast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ declines of trust in technology .
Australians were most worried about losing their job to the gig economy , followed by recession , lack of training , and foreign competitors .
The study also found a growing “ trust chasm ” between elites and the public that could be a reflection of income inequality , Edelman said .
We now observe an Alice in Wonderland moment of elite buoyancy and mass despair , ” he said .
While 65 per cent of the worldwide informed public ( aged 25-65 , university-educated , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ income ) said they trust their institutions , only 51 per cent of the mass public ( everyone else , representing 83 per cent of the total global population ) said the same .
“ The result is a world of two different trust realities , ” the report says .
“ The informed public – wealthier , more educated , and frequent consumers of news – remain far more trusting of every institution than the mass population .
“ In a majority of markets , less than half of the mass population @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right .
“ There are now a record eight markets showing all-time-high gaps between the two audiences – an alarming trust inequality.
” Trust levels among the informed public in Australia were at 68 per cent , far higher than the 45 per cent recorded among the mass population .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix @ @ @ @ @

By James Purtuill,
A growing sense of inequality is undermining trust in both society’s institutions and capitalism, according to a long-running global survey.
The 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer – now in its 20th year – has found many people no longer believe working hard will give them a better life.
Despite strong economic performance, a majority of respondents in every developed market do not believe they will be better off in five years’ time.
This means that economic growth no longer appears to drive trust, at least in developed markets – upending the conventional wisdom.
“We are living in a trust paradox,” said Richard Edelman, CEO of Edelman.
“Since we began measuring trust 20 years ago, economic growth has fostered rising trust. This continues in Asia and the Middle East but not in developed markets, where national income inequality is now the more important factor.
Fears are stifling hope, and long-held assumptions about hard work leading to upward mobility are now invalid.
Skip Animated GifFireFox NVDA users – To access the following content, press ‘M’ to enter the iFrame.
Growing ‘trust chasm’ between elites and the public
Fifty-six per cent of the surveyed global population said capitalism in its current form does more harm than good in the world.
Most employees (83 percent) globally are worried about job loss due to automation, a looming recession, lack of training, cheaper foreign competition, immigration and the gig economy.
Fifty-seven percent of respondents worry about losing the respect and dignity they once enjoyed in their country.
Nearly two in three feel the pace of technological change is too fast. Australia recorded one of the largest declines of trust in technology.
Australians were most worried about losing their job to the gig economy, followed by recession, lack of training, and foreign competitors.
The study also found a growing “trust chasm” between elites and the public that could be a reflection of income inequality, Edelman said.
We now observe an Alice in Wonderland moment of elite buoyancy and mass despair,” he said.
While 65 per cent of the worldwide informed public (aged 25-65, university-educated, in the top 25 per cent of household income) said they trust their institutions, only 51 per cent of the mass public (everyone else, representing 83 per cent of the total global population) said the same.
“The result is a world of two different trust realities,” the report says.
“The informed public – wealthier, more educated, and frequent consumers of news – remain far more trusting of every institution than the mass population.
“In a majority of markets, less than half of the mass population trust their institutions to do what is right.
“There are now a record eight markets showing all-time-high gaps between the two audiences – an alarming trust inequality.”
Trust levels among the informed public in Australia were at 68 per cent, far higher than the 45 per cent recorded among the mass population.
Source: https://www.abc.net.au
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-01-27--Twitter Openly Allows Pedophiles To Discuss Raping Children, While Banning Pro-Peace Accounts

Previously , TFTP reported how a disturbing push was made to attempt to normalize pedophilia as a mainstream “ sexual orientation.
” The move involved pedophiles rebranding themselves as “ Minor Attracted Persons ” ( MAP ) with the hope that they will be accepted like the LGBTQ community .
Disgustingly enough , it was somewhat effective as multiple outlets reported it like it was totally acceptable to be sexually attracted to children .
While this incident was extremely disturbing , even more worrisome is that this normalization appears to be spreading and as some recent activity on Twitter illustrates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media giants .
For those who don ’ t recall , TFTP had multiple accountsunceremoniously deleted by Twitter in October of 2018 on the very same day Facebook removed all of our accounts .
TFTP has never once spread hatred , racism , violence , or anything that even closely relates to these repugnant topics .
We have only advocated for peace by ending wars and transparency and accountability in government .
Nevertheless , Twitter wiped us away like specs of dirt from under their shoe .
They also wiped from existence multiple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wedler and the Antimedia .
The reason for mentioning the censorship above is to draw a parallel between speech that helps to make the world a better place getting banned and the current speech which is simply fine and dandy according to Twitter .
Since we reported on Minor Attracted Persons several years ago , the terminology became so popular that it morphed into multiple categories and abbreviations .
There are now NOMAPS , which apparently are the “ best kind ” of MAP because the “ NO ” means they don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That ’ s where the pro-c MAPs come in .
The “ pro-c ” denotes pro-contact as in the belief that children can consent into having physical contact and sex with an adult .
Children can not consent to sex with an adult .
Nevertheless , tags on Twitter now openly trend to promote this content .
Case in point , # mappositivity .
When searching this term on Twitter , one can find an entire community of Minor Attracted Persons both those claiming to be anti-touching as well as those claiming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to rape a child .
Yes , we are attracted to children .
…So what ?
TFTP found other MAPS on Twitter who claim that they are the victims because society doesn ’ t accept them .
We definitely don ’ t believe in discriminating against people for their mental illnesses but the trail of abused children left behind in the rampant pedophilia wake across the planet would likely disagree .
What ’ s more , many MAPS think that their pedophilia is not an illness and that it is entirely natural and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The illness , they claim , comes from society not accepting people who want to have sex with children — not from wanting to have sex with children .
Pedophilic disorder is an illness that is caused by the stigma associated with being a pedophile .
The attraction itself isn ’ t an illness .
Being depressed and feeling like shit because the world wants you dead is .
And the cure would be to stop all of you from perpetuating stigma There is an entire community on Twitter that discusses these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as long as they don ’ t talk about exploiting children — as we see many of the NOMAPs claiming to be against the pro-c rapist crowds .
In fact , as we ’ ve seen with other speech , reducing discussions and ideas to the dark corners of the internet through bans and censorship only makes it far worse .
Non-child raping MAPs having a place to discuss and hash out their sick desires is probably better than banning their speech and putting it in places where even sicker ideas and likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this article isn ’ t about these folks .
Just because some sicko has these desires and thoughts doesn ’ t mean they should be locked in a cage for not acting on them .
Acting on them would mean touching a child or consuming child porn .
If this doesn ’ t happen , it ’ s only thoughts and thoughts , no matter how sick , arguably have no victim .
This is why people can openly claim to be MAPs and not be arrested .
The point of this article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the hypocrisy of Twitter banning pro-peace and antiwar speech while allowing the pro-c MAPS a place to flourish and openly discuss sex with children .
“ Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted , provided they don ’ t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way , ” reads Twitter ’ s terms of service .
However , TFTP found two accounts : one belonging to a person claiming to be a pro-c MAP male who was open about his sexual relationship with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an account : And here is “ Jacob ’ s ” adult MAP who is pro-c , aka thinks it is fine to rape children : Both of the profiles have similar icons of a small child ’ s hand holding a larger adult hand .
Twitter has no problem with this despite the fact that it is an unlawful relationship with someone who openly admits he thinks it ’ s okay to have sex with children — oh , and his child victim .
One user who goes by the handle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children is a bad person and should unfollow him : I have no respect for anti contact MAP ’ s who throw pro-contact MAP ’ s under the bus and perpetuate falsehoods about CSA like typical anti-MAP ’ s do .
If you ’ re an anti contact MAP and you hate pro-contact MAP ’ s and you follow me then unfollow me right now .
@ KevinRo31884980 thinks that pro-c MAPs are not bad because children can consent to sex .
Despite what he thinks , a child can not consent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ adult to have sex with them , this is likely do to fear or grooming .
Nevertheless , Shane Trejo , with BLP found multiple accounts openly discussing the sexual abuse of children : The answers were repulsive to say the least .
In other words , how much sex diego would have with a child depends on how far he could groom the child into letting him go .
All these accounts are still active .
There you have it .
The platform that swiftly moved in and banned pro-peace , anti-racist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no problem allowing “ pro-c MAPs ” aka people who want to rape children , a forum for discussing just how much raping they do to children .
This is the state of social media today .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

From TheFreeThoughtProject:
Previously, TFTP reported how a disturbing push was made to attempt to normalize pedophilia as a mainstream “sexual orientation.” The move involved pedophiles rebranding themselves as “Minor Attracted Persons” (MAP) with the hope that they will be accepted like the LGBTQ community.
Disgustingly enough, it was somewhat effective as multiple outlets reported it like it was totally acceptable to be sexually attracted to children. While this incident was extremely disturbing, even more worrisome is that this normalization appears to be spreading and as some recent activity on Twitter illustrates, it’s condoned by social media giants.
For those who don’t recall, TFTP had multiple accountsunceremoniously deleted by Twitter in October of 2018 on the very same day Facebook removed all of our accounts.
TFTP has never once spread hatred, racism, violence, or anything that even closely relates to these repugnant topics. We have only advocated for peace by ending wars and transparency and accountability in government. Nevertheless, Twitter wiped us away like specs of dirt from under their shoe. They also wiped from existence multiple other pro-peace and freedom accounts like Carey Wedler and the Antimedia.
The reason for mentioning the censorship above is to draw a parallel between speech that helps to make the world a better place getting banned and the current speech which is simply fine and dandy according to Twitter.
Since we reported on Minor Attracted Persons several years ago, the terminology became so popular that it morphed into multiple categories and abbreviations. There are now NOMAPS, which apparently are the “best kind” of MAP because the “NO” means they don’t want to have sex with children.
That’s where the pro-c MAPs come in. The “pro-c” denotes pro-contact as in the belief that children can consent into having physical contact and sex with an adult. Children cannot consent to sex with an adult.
Nevertheless, tags on Twitter now openly trend to promote this content. Case in point, #mappositivity. When searching this term on Twitter, one can find an entire community of Minor Attracted Persons both those claiming to be anti-touching as well as those claiming it’s just fine and dandy to rape a child.
Yes, we are attracted to children.
…So what?
— λ Charlie λ (@HappyNight_o) December 26, 2019
TFTP found other MAPS on Twitter who claim that they are the victims because society doesn’t accept them. We definitely don’t believe in discriminating against people for their mental illnesses but the trail of abused children left behind in the rampant pedophilia wake across the planet would likely disagree.
What’s more, many MAPS think that their pedophilia is not an illness and that it is entirely natural and normal to be sexually attracted to children. The illness, they claim, comes from society not accepting people who want to have sex with children — not from wanting to have sex with children.
Pedophilic disorder is an illness that is caused by the stigma associated with being a pedophile.
The attraction itself isn’t an illness. Being depressed and feeling like shit because the world wants you dead is. And the cure would be to stop all of you from perpetuating stigma
— Fluffy (@Fluffy_MAP) December 26, 2019
There is an entire community on Twitter that discusses these ideas and it is likely healthy — as long as they don’t talk about exploiting children — as we see many of the NOMAPs claiming to be against the pro-c rapist crowds.
In fact, as we’ve seen with other speech, reducing discussions and ideas to the dark corners of the internet through bans and censorship only makes it far worse. Non-child raping MAPs having a place to discuss and hash out their sick desires is probably better than banning their speech and putting it in places where even sicker ideas and likely child porn is openly exchanged.
But this article isn’t about these folks. Just because some sicko has these desires and thoughts doesn’t mean they should be locked in a cage for not acting on them. Acting on them would mean touching a child or consuming child porn. If this doesn’t happen, it’s only thoughts and thoughts, no matter how sick, arguably have no victim. This is why people can openly claim to be MAPs and not be arrested.
The point of this article, however, is to point out the hypocrisy of Twitter banning pro-peace and antiwar speech while allowing the pro-c MAPS a place to flourish and openly discuss sex with children.
“Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way,” reads Twitter’s terms of service.
However, TFTP found two accounts: one belonging to a person claiming to be a pro-c MAP male who was open about his sexual relationship with a 13-year-old boy — who also has an account:
And here is “Jacob’s” adult MAP who is pro-c, aka thinks it is fine to rape children:
Both of the profiles have similar icons of a small child’s hand holding a larger adult hand. Twitter has no problem with this despite the fact that it is an unlawful relationship with someone who openly admits he thinks it’s okay to have sex with children — oh, and his child victim.
It continues…
One user who goes by the handle @KevinRo31884980 thinks anyone who is anti-sex with children is a bad person and should unfollow him:
I have no respect for anti contact MAP’s who throw pro-contact MAP’s under the bus and perpetuate falsehoods about CSA like typical anti-MAP’s do. If you’re an anti contact MAP and you hate pro-contact MAP’s and you follow me then unfollow me right now.
— Abolish the Selective Service System (@KevinRo31884980) December 20, 2019
@KevinRo31884980 thinks that pro-c MAPs are not bad because children can consent to sex. Despite what he thinks, a child cannot consent. If a young child willingly allows an adult to have sex with them, this is likely do to fear or grooming.
Nevertheless, Shane Trejo, with BLP found multiple accounts openly discussing the sexual abuse of children:
The answers were repulsive to say the least.
In other words, how much sex diego would have with a child depends on how far he could groom the child into letting him go.
It got worse:
All these accounts are still active.
There you have it. The platform that swiftly moved in and banned pro-peace, anti-racist, pro-liberty, and antiwar speech has no problem allowing “pro-c MAPs” aka people who want to rape children, a forum for discussing just how much raping they do to children.
This is the state of social media today.
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-01-27--Event 201: Bill Gates & World Economic Forum Simulated Coronavirus Outbreak 6 Weeks Before First Cas

Event 201: Bill Gates & World Economic Forum Simulated Coronavirus Outbreak 6 Weeks Before First Case in Wuhan

Event 201 is a pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18 , 2019 , in New York , NY .
The exercise illustrated the pandemic preparedness efforts needed to diminish the large-scale economic and societal consequences of a severe pandemic .
Drawing from actual events , Event 201 identifies important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention .
These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Event 201 pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18 , 2019 , in New York , NY .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

By The Renegade,
Event 201 is a pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated the pandemic preparedness efforts needed to diminish the large-scale economic and societal consequences of a severe pandemic. Drawing from actual events, Event 201 identifies important policy issues and preparedness challenges that could be solved with sufficient political will and attention. These issues were designed in a narrative to engage and educate the participants and the audience.
Selected moments from the Event 201 pandemic tabletop exercise hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY.
Segment 1, Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion
Segment 2, Trade and Travel Discussion
Pandemic Exercise: Segment 3, Finance Discussion
Source: http://www.renegadetribune.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-01-28--Are Mandatory Vaccines Coming to Your State? Feds & Big Pharma Push to Force States to Mandate ALL C

Are Mandatory Vaccines Coming to Your State? Feds & Big Pharma Push to Force States to Mandate ALL CDC Recommended Vaccines

Is a Bill Requiring Your Children to Get Every CDC Recommended Vaccination Coming to Your State ?
As vaccine-related bills are being introduced into state legislatures this month , a bill ( HB1090 ) has been proposed in the Virginia legislature to require school children to receive every dose of all current and future vaccines added to the recommended childhood vaccine schedule by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) appointed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) .
It removes legal authority from the state Board of Health to make recommendations to the General @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Care and the Governor for revision of the list of vaccines required for school children and effectively transfers that authority to an unelected federal advisory committee .
In what is a very transparent power grab by federal government officials that is sure to make pharmaceutical company stockholders smile , this type of proposed legislation could be coming soon to your state , too .
Here is why automatically codifying federal vaccine use recommendations into state law threatens the integrity of representative government in our constitutional republic and is a threat to the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Violation of Historic Separation of Federal and State Powers .
State legislators voting to enact laws , which automatically codify federal ACIP recommendations into state law , are abdicating responsibility and accountability for exercising power authorized by the U.S. Constitution by handing that power over to unelected members of a federal government advisory committee .
The authors of the U.S. Constitution recognized it was important to balance the powers of the federal and state governments,1 and to include a Bill of Rights guaranteeing individuals natural rights and civil liberties that limit the power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not defined in the U.S. Constitution as a federal activity defaults to the states.3 4 Historically , the legal authority to create public health laws to control infectious disease transmission among residents living in each state has belonged to state legislatures , health departments and Boards of Health , while the legal authority to protect the U.S. population from infectious diseases brought into the country by people crossing national borders or state borders belongs to the federal government.5 6 In 1905 , the US Supreme Court affirmed the constitutional authority of state legislatures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during epidemics .
The Court warned states vaccine laws should not be implemented in way that they become “ cruel and inhuman to the last degree ” for individuals and “ lead to injustice , oppression , or an absurd consequence.
” 7 8 Relinquishing power to the federal government that is reserved to the states and eliminating necessary checks and balances on federal power , betrays democratic principles foundational to the representative government of our constitutional republic .
Cuts Citizens Out of the Law-Making Process Transferring authority to mandate vaccines from duly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an unelected federal government advisory committee poses a risk to the health and welfare of children and usurps the right of Americans to publicly participate in the law making process through their elected representatives .
CDC appointed members of ACIP , who can have financial ties to vaccine manufacturers , and government health officials engaging in public-private partnerships with the pharmaceutical industry,9 have no legal responsibility or accountability for what happens to the health of a child who is harmed by a state mandated vaccine.10 11 State legislatures , state health departments and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knowledgeable position than the federal government to effectively address public health issues in the states .
Giving a federal agency blanket legal authority to automatically mandate every vaccine recommended by the CDC for use by all children attending daycare and school in every state will certainly financially benefit pharmaceutical companies but will not equally benefit citizens .
In 1980 , the cost to “ fully ” vaccinate a child in a private doctor ’ s office according to CDC recommendations was $ 17 12 and that cost is now a staggering $ 3,000.13 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to vaccinate a child with every new vaccine licensed by the FDA and recommended for all children by the CDC .
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America ( PhRMA ) list 264 vaccines in active development by drug companies , including 137 infectious disease vaccines.14 The World Health Organization ( WHO ) , with taxpayer funding by the CDC,15 is fast tracking development of 13 vaccines by multi-national pharmaceutical corporations.16 Most of these vaccines , as well as many others , will be recommended by ACIP for use by all children , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Malaria , Influenza , Respiratory Syncytial Virus ( RSV ) , Group A Streptococcus , Group B Streptococcus , Herpes Simplex Virus ( HSV ) , E-coli ; Shigella , Gonorrhea , Chikungunya and Salmonella .
The global vaccine market was valued at $ 28 billion in 2016 and is projected to become between $ 48 billion and $ 93 billion by 2025.17 Market forecasters predict North America will dominate the US vaccine market that “ is expected to rise at a significant pace ” due to “ the presence of several key @ @ @ @ @ @ @ favorable government policies for manufacturing and sales of vaccines.
” 18 Public-private business partnerships between the federal government and the pharmaceutical industry guarantee that most vaccines being developed by drug companies will be licensed and recommended for use by children and adults by the government.19 U.S. vaccine manufacturers Merck & Co. ( rotavirus , HPV , hepatitis A , hepatitis B , varicella zoster ( chickenpox ) , MMR , MMRV , pneumococcal vaccines ) and Pfizer ( pneumococcal , meningococcal B vaccines ) , as well as the UK pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ B , influenza , meningococcal , DTaP , DT , Tdap , HIB ; polio vaccines ) and France ’ s Sanofi Pasteur ( influenza , meningococcal , DTaP , DT , Tdap , HIB , polio vaccines ) 20 will reap significant profits if states enact laws automatically mandating that children get every dose of every existing and new vaccine without deliberation by state health departments , Boards of Health or public hearings in the legislature providing input from residents impacted by vaccine mandates .
Many states are already undergoing significant budget @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all ACIP recommended vaccinations to school requirements for children creates an unfunded mandate that increases the state ’ s health care costs at the expense of other programs and services .
Vaccines are commercial pharmaceutical products carrying risks that can be greater for some individuals for genetic , epigenetic and other biological or environmental reasons but doctors can not reliably predict who will be harmed.21 There are long standing vaccine safety knowledge gaps detailed by the Institute of Medicine in more than 20 years of published studies on vaccine safety issues,22 23 including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the birth to six year old vaccine schedule recommended by the CDC.24 25 The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ( VICP ) for children injured by CDC-recommended vaccines .
The VICP has awarded more than $ 4 billion to vaccine victims since 1988 , although two out of three vaccine injured plaintiffs are turned away without financial support.26 The Act passed in 1986 gave vaccine manufacturers partial liability protection and did not shield doctors or other vaccine administrators from civil liability when vaccines cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rule making changes by the federal government between 1987 and 2016 shielded vaccine providers from liability and substantially weakened the Act ’ s safety and compensation provisions.27 Since 2011 when the U.S. Supreme Court declared that FDA licensed vaccines are “ unavoidably unsafe , ” 28 pharmaceutical corporations have no civil liability for harm caused by vaccines mandated by state governments for children to attend daycare and school.29 The CDC acknowledges that clinical trials of new vaccines conducted by drug companies seeking licenses for new vaccines often contain too few participants followed up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not closely represent the U.S. population in terms of demographics , race and ethnicity.30 Some new vaccines licensed by the FDA have been proven to be too reactive and have been withdrawn from the market within a few years of licensure after persistent reports of vaccine-related brain and immune system damage and death.31 32 The true effectiveness of new vaccines following licensure is also not certain for years or even decades .
Vaccinated persons can get infected with and transmit infectious diseases , often without showing symptoms or being diagnosed and reported.33 34 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ example , the Centers for Disease Control acknowledged in 2019 that vaccinated children can still get pertussis ( whooping cough ) because the B. pertussis microbe has genetically mutated and the current vaccines do not contain all strains .
41 Very few states have mandated that school children get HPV or annual influenza vaccinations , which are recommended for all children by the ACIP .
However , if states codify ACIP recommendations into law , children attending daycare and school would be required to receive the flu shot every year , despite the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effective less than 50 % of the time over the last 15 years.42 HPV vaccinations would be required , despite the fact that HPV can not be transmitted in a school setting.43 Citizens in every state , along with state health departments and Boards of Health , should have an opportunity to review the scientific evidence when considering the benefits and risks of federally recommended vaccines for children and work with duly elected legislators to make informed decisions about whether a particular vaccine should be included in public health laws as a requirement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proposed legislation could put more immune compromised and medically fragile students at risk of suffering vaccine reactions or contracting vaccine strain infections if all current and future vaccinations recommended by the federal government for children are automatically mandated for children to attend daycare and school in the states .
The ACIP has eliminated almost all contraindications to vaccination44 and the CDC now directs doctors to give inactivated vaccines and most live virus vaccines to all children , regardless of whether they are severely immune compromised or have suffered previous vaccine reactions.45 46 47 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s health at the time of vaccination , children and adults who have recently received live virus vaccines , such as varicella zoster,48 influenza49 and measles,50 shed vaccine strain virus in body fluids for different amounts of time .
Immune compromised individuals receiving live virus vaccines often shed vaccine strain virus for longer periods of time.51 52 53 Additionally , vaccine strain infections can be misdiagnosed as wild type infections,54 which can result in mischaracterization of the true nature of reported outbreaks of disease .
For the past several decades , states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ special education classrooms to meet the needs of disabled and chronically ill students.55 56 Children already disabled by vaccine reactions and medically fragile children will be at increased risk for vaccine injury .
Special education costs could increase significantly in states if every ACIP recommended vaccine is required for every child to attend daycare and school in every state .
There is a long-standing principle in U.S. law that parents have a legal right to raise their children without undue adverse interference by the State .
In 1979 , the Supreme Court stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voluntary , informed consent to medical risk taking is central to the ethical practice of medicine and implementation of public health laws.58 Those rights can be protected if citizens are able to work with their elected representatives to ensure they are not stripped for public health laws .
The lucrative public private partnership between multi-national pharmaceutical companies and government health agencies that develop and regulate vaccines and make national vaccine policy are driving the mandatory vaccination lobby to persuade state legislators to give up their constitutional authority and ethical responsibility for creating state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those they govern .
State legislatures that transfer constitutional authority to mandate vaccines to unelected members of a federal agency committee are betraying foundational principles of representative government .
Virginia HB1090 is scheduled to be heard in a House health committee on Tuesday , Jan. 21 at 4 pm .
For details and updates on that bill and other vaccine-related bills that have been introduced in state legislatures this year , become a user of and access the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

Is a Bill Requiring Your Children to Get Every CDC Recommended Vaccination Coming to Your State?
by Barbara Loe Fisher,
As vaccine-related bills are being introduced into state legislatures this month, a bill (HB1090) has been proposed in the Virginia legislature to require school children to receive every dose of all current and future vaccines added to the recommended childhood vaccine schedule by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) appointed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
It removes legal authority from the state Board of Health to make recommendations to the General Assembly, the Joint Commission on Health Care and the Governor for revision of the list of vaccines required for school children and effectively transfers that authority to an unelected federal advisory committee.
In what is a very transparent power grab by federal government officials that is sure to make pharmaceutical company stockholders smile, this type of proposed legislation could be coming soon to your state, too.
Here is why automatically codifying federal vaccine use recommendations into state law threatens the integrity of representative government in our constitutional republic and is a threat to the public health and civil and human rights.
Violation of Historic Separation of Federal and State Powers.
State legislators voting to enact laws, which automatically codify federal ACIP recommendations into state law, are abdicating responsibility and accountability for exercising power authorized by the U.S. Constitution by handing that power over to unelected members of a federal government advisory committee.
The authors of the U.S. Constitution recognized it was important to balance the powers of the federal and state governments,1 and to include a Bill of Rights guaranteeing individuals natural rights and civil liberties that limit the power of both federal and state governments.2 Anything not defined in the U.S. Constitution as a federal activity defaults to the states.3 4
Historically, the legal authority to create public health laws to control infectious disease transmission among residents living in each state has belonged to state legislatures, health departments and Boards of Health, while the legal authority to protect the U.S. population from infectious diseases brought into the country by people crossing national borders or state borders belongs to the federal government.5 6
In 1905, the US Supreme Court affirmed the constitutional authority of state legislatures to mandate that citizens receive smallpox vaccinations during epidemics. The Court warned states vaccine laws should not be implemented in way that they become “cruel and inhuman to the last degree” for individuals and “lead to injustice, oppression, or an absurd consequence.”7 8
Relinquishing power to the federal government that is reserved to the states and eliminating necessary checks and balances on federal power, betrays democratic principles foundational to the representative government of our constitutional republic.
Cuts Citizens Out of the Law-Making Process
Transferring authority to mandate vaccines from duly elected members of a state legislature to an unelected federal government advisory committee poses a risk to the health and welfare of children and usurps the right of Americans to publicly participate in the law making process through their elected representatives.
CDC appointed members of ACIP, who can have financial ties to vaccine manufacturers, and government health officials engaging in public-private partnerships with the pharmaceutical industry,9 have no legal responsibility or accountability for what happens to the health of a child who is harmed by a state mandated vaccine.10 11 State legislatures, state health departments and Boards of Health are in a more knowledgeable position than the federal government to effectively address public health issues in the states.
Writes Pharma A Blank Check
Giving a federal agency blanket legal authority to automatically mandate every vaccine recommended by the CDC for use by all children attending daycare and school in every state will certainly financially benefit pharmaceutical companies but will not equally benefit citizens.
In 1980, the cost to “fully” vaccinate a child in a private doctor’s office according to CDC recommendations was $17 12 and that cost is now a staggering $3,000.13 There is no limit on future costs to vaccinate a child with every new vaccine licensed by the FDA and recommended for all children by the CDC.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) list 264 vaccines in active development by drug companies, including 137 infectious disease vaccines.14 The World Health Organization (WHO), with taxpayer funding by the CDC,15 is fast tracking development of 13 vaccines by multi-national pharmaceutical corporations.16
Most of these vaccines, as well as many others, will be recommended by ACIP for use by all children, including vaccines for HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria, Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Group A Streptococcus, Group B Streptococcus, Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), E-coli; Shigella, Gonorrhea, Chikungunya and Salmonella.
The global vaccine market was valued at $28 billion in 2016 and is projected to become between $48 billion and $93 billion by 2025.17 Market forecasters predict North America will dominate the US vaccine market that “is expected to rise at a significant pace” due to “the presence of several key manufacturers in the region” and “favorable government policies for manufacturing and sales of vaccines.”18
Public-private business partnerships between the federal government and the pharmaceutical industry guarantee that most vaccines being developed by drug companies will be licensed and recommended for use by children and adults by the government.19
U.S. vaccine manufacturers Merck & Co. (rotavirus, HPV, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, varicella zoster (chickenpox), MMR, MMRV, pneumococcal vaccines) and Pfizer (pneumococcal, meningococcal B vaccines), as well as the UK pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (rotavirus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, meningococcal, DTaP, DT, Tdap, HIB; polio vaccines) and France’s Sanofi Pasteur (influenza, meningococcal, DTaP, DT, Tdap, HIB, polio vaccines)20 will reap significant profits if states enact laws automatically mandating that children get every dose of every existing and new vaccine without deliberation by state health departments, Boards of Health or public hearings in the legislature providing input from residents impacted by vaccine mandates.
Creates Unfunded Mandates
Many states are already undergoing significant budget challenges. A law that automatically adds all ACIP recommended vaccinations to school requirements for children creates an unfunded mandate that increases the state’s health care costs at the expense of other programs and services.
Ignores Vaccine Risks and Rewards Liability-Free Vaccine Manufacturers
Vaccines are commercial pharmaceutical products carrying risks that can be greater for some individuals for genetic, epigenetic and other biological or environmental reasons but doctors cannot reliably predict who will be harmed.21
There are long standing vaccine safety knowledge gaps detailed by the Institute of Medicine in more than 20 years of published studies on vaccine safety issues,22 23 including lack of studies scientifically evaluating the safety of the birth to six year old vaccine schedule recommended by the CDC.24 25
The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) for children injured by CDC-recommended vaccines. The VICP has awarded more than $4 billion to vaccine victims since 1988, although two out of three vaccine injured plaintiffs are turned away without financial support.26
The Act passed in 1986 gave vaccine manufacturers partial liability protection and did not shield doctors or other vaccine administrators from civil liability when vaccines cause harm.
However, subsequent amendments and rule making changes by the federal government between 1987 and 2016 shielded vaccine providers from liability and substantially weakened the Act’s safety and compensation provisions.27
Since 2011 when the U.S. Supreme Court declared that FDA licensed vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe,”28 pharmaceutical corporations have no civil liability for harm caused by vaccines mandated by state governments for children to attend daycare and school.29
Creates an Uncontrolled Scientific Experiment on School Children
The CDC acknowledges that clinical trials of new vaccines conducted by drug companies seeking licenses for new vaccines often contain too few participants followed up for limited time periods, who may not closely represent the U.S. population in terms of demographics, race and ethnicity.30
Some new vaccines licensed by the FDA have been proven to be too reactive and have been withdrawn from the market within a few years of licensure after persistent reports of vaccine-related brain and immune system damage and death.31 32
The true effectiveness of new vaccines following licensure is also not certain for years or even decades. Vaccinated persons can get infected with and transmit infectious diseases, often without showing symptoms or being diagnosed and reported.33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
For example, the Centers for Disease Control acknowledged in 2019 that vaccinated children can still get pertussis (whooping cough) because the B. pertussis microbe has genetically mutated and the current vaccines do not contain all strains. 41
Very few states have mandated that school children get HPV or annual influenza vaccinations, which are recommended for all children by the ACIP.
However, if states codify ACIP recommendations into law, children attending daycare and school would be required to receive the flu shot every year, despite the CDC reporting that the influenza vaccine was effective less than 50% of the time over the last 15 years.42 HPV vaccinations would be required, despite the fact that HPV cannot be transmitted in a school setting.43
Citizens in every state, along with state health departments and Boards of Health, should have an opportunity to review the scientific evidence when considering the benefits and risks of federally recommended vaccines for children and work with duly elected legislators to make informed decisions about whether a particular vaccine should be included in public health laws as a requirement for school attendance.
Endangers Medically Fragile Children
This type of proposed legislation could put more immune compromised and medically fragile students at risk of suffering vaccine reactions or contracting vaccine strain infections if all current and future vaccinations recommended by the federal government for children are automatically mandated for children to attend daycare and school in the states.
The ACIP has eliminated almost all contraindications to vaccination44 and the CDC now directs doctors to give inactivated vaccines and most live virus vaccines to all children, regardless of whether they are severely immune compromised or have suffered previous vaccine reactions.45 46 47
Depending upon the vaccine and an individual’s health at the time of vaccination, children and adults who have recently received live virus vaccines, such as varicella zoster,48 influenza49 and measles,50 shed vaccine strain virus in body fluids for different amounts of time. Immune compromised individuals receiving live virus vaccines often shed vaccine strain virus for longer periods of time.51 52 53
Additionally, vaccine strain infections can be misdiagnosed as wild type infections,54 which can result in mischaracterization of the true nature of reported outbreaks of disease.
For the past several decades, states have had to create more and more special education classrooms to meet the needs of disabled and chronically ill students.55 56
Children already disabled by vaccine reactions and medically fragile children will be at increased risk for vaccine injury. Special education costs could increase significantly in states if every ACIP recommended vaccine is required for every child to attend daycare and school in every state.
Contradicts Supreme Court Decisions on Parental Rights and Violates Human Rights
There is a long-standing principle in U.S. law that parents have a legal right to raise their children without undue adverse interference by the State.
In 1979, the Supreme Court stated that,
deeply rooted in our Nation’s history and tradition, is the belief that the parental role implies a substantial measure of authority over one’s children. Indeed, “constitutional interpretation has consistently recognized that the parents’ claim to authority in their own household to direct the rearing of their children is basic in the structure of our society.”57
The human right to exercise voluntary, informed consent to medical risk taking is central to the ethical practice of medicine and implementation of public health laws.58
Those rights can be protected if citizens are able to work with their elected representatives to ensure they are not stripped for public health laws.
The lucrative public private partnership between multi-national pharmaceutical companies and government health agencies that develop and regulate vaccines and make national vaccine policy are driving the mandatory vaccination lobby to persuade state legislators to give up their constitutional authority and ethical responsibility for creating state public health laws with the consent of those they govern.
State legislatures that transfer constitutional authority to mandate vaccines to unelected members of a federal agency committee are betraying foundational principles of representative government.
Monitoring Proposed Legislation In Your State
Virginia HB1090 is scheduled to be heard in a House health committee on Tuesday, Jan. 21 at 4 pm. For details and updates on that bill and other vaccine-related bills that have been introduced in state legislatures this year, become a user of and access the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal.
Source: TheVaccineReaction.org.
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-01-28--‘This Is Not a Peace Plan, It Is a War Plan’: Trump-Netanyahu Deal Decried as Shameful Attack on Pal

‘This Is Not a Peace Plan, It Is a War Plan’: Trump-Netanyahu Deal Decried as Shameful Attack on Palestinian Rights

“ Any attempt to address the Israeli-Palestinian issue that does not begin and end with the full acknowledgment of the Palestinian right to self-determination , freedom , justice , and equality is a non-starter.
” Palestinians watch the televised press conference of U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on January 28 , 2020 , at the Khan Yunis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip .
( Photo : Said Khatib/AFP via Getty Images ) Human rights advocates condemned U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ’ s “ annexation plan ” for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two leaders on Tuesday presented what they termed a “ peace deal ” for Israel and Palestine .
“ This is not a peace plan .
It is theft .
It is erasure.
” —Rep .
Ilhan Omar ( D-Minn. ) Critics joined Palestinian leaders in rejecting the premise of the so-called “ vision for peace , ” which was drafted by the White House and Netanyahu without the input of Palestinians .
The resulting plan is “ shameful and disingenuous , ” tweeted Rep. Ilhan Omar ( D-Minn. ) .
The plan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control of Palestinian territories while assuring Palestine that it will be afforded “ a pathway to a future state ” —but one that will have no military of its own and in which Israel will maintain security control over some areas .
“ This is not a peace plan , ” tweeted Yousef Munayyer , executive director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights .
“ It is a war plan.
” ‘ “ It ’ s stunning that Donald Trump doesn ’ t know that this is insulting to Palestinians , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Arab American Institute .
“ This plan is simply a rubber stamp for the Israeli government ’ s continuing violations of international law , separate-and-unequal policies , land grabs , and human rights abuses against the Palestinian people , ” said the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights in a statement .
“ Any attempt to address the Israeli-Palestinian issue that does not begin and end with the full acknowledgment of the Palestinian right to self-determination , freedom , justice , and equality is a non-starter.
” Jerusalem will be established as Israel ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Palestinians ’ aim to recognize East Jerusalem as their capitol ; the recognition of the majority of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine ; the recognition of the Jordan Valley , which makes up a third of the occupied West Bank , as part of Israel ; and the refusal by Israel to grant Palestinians the “ right to return ” to their homes lost in the Six-Day War and other conflicts .
Palestinians in occupied territories held protests on Tuesday ahead of the deal ’ s announcement .
Larger demonstrations are planned for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace , but what is being talked about is not peace , ” Ahmed Shafiq , a student in Gaza , told The Guardian .
“ Peace is not imposed on people.
” The so-called “ peace deal ” amounts to “ an endorsement of Israel ’ s aggression , allowing it to take over whatever Palestinian lands it wants and punishing the victims for daring to object to having their homeland stolen , ” said Omar Baddar , deputy director of the Arab American Institute , in a short video the group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Netanyahu ’ s vision for the future of Palestine resembled “ a Native American reservation ” more than a sovereign state , said entrepreneur Shahed Amanullah .
“ This is not a peace plan , ” tweeted Omar .
“ It is theft .
It is erasure.
” Munayyer of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights called on Americans and the international community to reject Trump ’ s attempt to “ whitewash the apartheid reality alongside his Israeli partners-in-war-crimes.
” “ The only suitable response from people of conscience is to reject @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israel ’ s denial of Palestinian rights , ” Munayyer said .
“ The separate-and-unequal reality the Israeli government has imposed on Palestinians , with the support of the U.S. , flies in the face of the values Americans claim to uphold .
Freedom , justice , and equality for Palestinians is the only way forward.
” Rep. Rashida Tlaib ( D-Mich. ) , whose parents immigrated to the U.S. from occupied Palestine , slammed Trump and Netanyahu for releasing the plan as both are facing re-election campaigns and legal battles .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plan was released by a forever impeached president on the same day that Netanyahu was indicted for corruption , ” Tlaib tweeted .
“ This political stunt gets us no closer to peace or justice.
” “ This is a political ploy by both leaders to distract from their abuse of power , designed to help Netanyahu win the election in less than six weeks , ” Emily Meyer , co-founder of Jewish progressive group If Not Now , said in a statement .
“ The plan itself is a plan for permanent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a plan for peace .
It is simply a continuation of Trump ’ s strategy since entering office : to disenfranchise Palestinians and deny their rights , their agency , and even their identity.
” Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

“Any attempt to address the Israeli-Palestinian issue that does not begin and end with the full acknowledgment of the Palestinian right to self-determination, freedom, justice, and equality is a non-starter.”
Palestinians watch the televised press conference of U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on January 28, 2020, at the Khan Yunis refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip. (Photo: Said Khatib/AFP via Getty Images)
By Julia Conley,
Human rights advocates condemned U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “annexation plan” for large swaths of Palestinian territory as the two leaders on Tuesday presented what they termed a “peace deal” for Israel and Palestine.
“This is not a peace plan. It is theft. It is erasure.”
—Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)Critics joined Palestinian leaders in rejecting the premise of the so-called “vision for peace,” which was drafted by the White House and Netanyahu without the input of Palestinians.
The resulting plan is “shameful and disingenuous,” tweeted Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.).
They could have guaranteed justice, and brought everyone into this peace deal. Instead these two embattled heads of state, impeached and indicted, have a “ just us” peace deal. It’s shameful and disingenuous! https://t.co/THIniOEv8B — Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) January 28, 2020
The plan aims to expand and make official Israeli control of Palestinian territories while assuring Palestine that it will be afforded “a pathway to a future state”—but one that will have no military of its own and in which Israel will maintain security control over some areas.
“This is not a peace plan,” tweeted Yousef Munayyer, executive director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights. “It is a war plan.”‘
This is not a peace plan, it is a war plan. A war on peace
A war on justice
A war on freedom
A war on equality A war on Palestinian existence — Yousef Munayyer (@YousefMunayyer) January 28, 2020
“It’s stunning that Donald Trump doesn’t know that this is insulting to Palestinians,” tweeted James Zogby, founder of the Arab American Institute.
It’s stunning that @realDonaldTrump doesn’t know that this is insulting to Palestinians. It’s not a “state” it’s a “Bantustan.” Palestinians lose more land w/out sovereignty & independence. Israel gets more land & keeps settlements. It’s Trump’s plan to try to legalize illegality https://t.co/RDE6iJ0krf — James J. Zogby (@jjz1600) January 28, 2020
“This plan is simply a rubber stamp for the Israeli government’s continuing violations of international law, separate-and-unequal policies, land grabs, and human rights abuses against the Palestinian people,” said the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights in a statement. “Any attempt to address the Israeli-Palestinian issue that does not begin and end with the full acknowledgment of the Palestinian right to self-determination, freedom, justice, and equality is a non-starter.”
Major points within the deal include:
Jerusalem will be established as Israel’s “undivided” capitol, undermining Palestinians’ aim to recognize East Jerusalem as their capitol;
the recognition of the majority of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine;
the recognition of the Jordan Valley, which makes up a third of the occupied West Bank, as part of Israel; and
the refusal by Israel to grant Palestinians the “right to return” to their homes lost in the Six-Day War and other conflicts.
Palestinians in occupied territories held protests on Tuesday ahead of the deal’s announcement. Larger demonstrations are planned for Wednesday.
“I am not against peace, but what is being talked about is not peace,” Ahmed Shafiq, a student in Gaza, told The Guardian. “Peace is not imposed on people.”
The so-called “peace deal” amounts to “an endorsement of Israel’s aggression, allowing it to take over whatever Palestinian lands it wants and punishing the victims for daring to object to having their homeland stolen,” said Omar Baddar, deputy director of the Arab American Institute, in a short video the group released.
Want to know why this "ultimate deal" is a sham & a disgrace that will never lead to peace? @OmarBaddar explains:#DealOfTheCentury #Apartheid pic.twitter.com/1k9Ig0q9ND — Arab American Institute (@AAIUSA) January 28, 2020
A map released showing Trump and Netanyahu’s vision for the future of Palestine resembled “a Native American reservation” more than a sovereign state, said entrepreneur Shahed Amanullah.
This doesn't look like a state. It looks like a Native American reservation. https://t.co/ZwHMt0L0V7 pic.twitter.com/S2gO5gdV4t — Shahed Amanullah (@shahed) January 28, 2020
“This is not a peace plan,” tweeted Omar. “It is theft. It is erasure.”
Munayyer of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights called on Americans and the international community to reject Trump’s attempt to “whitewash the apartheid reality alongside his Israeli partners-in-war-crimes.”
“The only suitable response from people of conscience is to reject this effort and demand immediate accountability for Israel’s denial of Palestinian rights,” Munayyer said. “The separate-and-unequal reality the Israeli government has imposed on Palestinians, with the support of the U.S., flies in the face of the values Americans claim to uphold. Freedom, justice, and equality for Palestinians is the only way forward.”
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), whose parents immigrated to the U.S. from occupied Palestine, slammed Trump and Netanyahu for releasing the plan as both are facing re-election campaigns and legal battles.
“It’s fitting that the Trump-Netanyahu plan was released by a forever impeached president on the same day that Netanyahu was indicted for corruption,” Tlaib tweeted. “This political stunt gets us no closer to peace or justice.”
It’s fitting that the @realDonaldTrump–@netanyahu "plan" was released by a forever impeached President on the same day that Netanyahu was indicted for corruption. This political stunt gets us no closer to peace or justice. As a member of Congress, I consider it a non-starter. https://t.co/PIYYZ75PWc — Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@RepRashida) January 28, 2020
“This is a political ploy by both leaders to distract from their abuse of power, designed to help Netanyahu win the election in less than six weeks,” Emily Meyer, co-founder of Jewish progressive group If Not Now, said in a statement. “The plan itself is a plan for permanent Israeli military occupation and control, not a plan for peace. It is simply a continuation of Trump’s strategy since entering office: to disenfranchise Palestinians and deny their rights, their agency, and even their identity.”
Rabbi Alissa Wise, a top advocate with Jewish Voice for Peace, a grassroots organization advocating for human rights for Israelis and Palestinians, called it “an apartheid plan”.
“International law, global consensus and decades of US policy concur that Palestinian land isn’t for Trump to give away nor for Netanyahu to steal,” Wise said.
“The only way forward towards lasting peace for Israelis and Palestinians is through justice, freedom, and equality for everyone.”
If Not Now, a progressive anti-occupation Jewish group, circulated a petition to oppose the plan.
“Trump’s entire strategy has been to disenfranchise Palestinians and deny their rights, their agency, and even their identity,” the petition says.
“Zero Palestinians were invited to the White House meeting about the plan or involved in the fake-process that led to this plan.”
Source: https://www.commondreams.org
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage