prepareforchange--2020-11-22--America’s Social Credit System Is Worse than China’s

China is notorious for a “ Social Credit System ” that controls the lives of citizens , rewarding what the authorities want and punishing what they don ’ t .
The United States has a social credit system , too , even if we don ’ t call it that .
And ours is worse .
The Chinese system tries to build social trust .
Ours destroys trust .
The Chinese system defends the interests of the Han , the ethnic group that built and sustains Chinese civilization .
Our system hurts whites .
The Chinese system encourages charity , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incites hatred and spreads bitterness and division .
The Chinese government ’ s goals are clear : According to a 2014 planning document , the state wants to build a “ social credit environment of honesty , self-discipline , trustworthiness , and mutual trust.
” Despite the reputation of the Chinese Communist Party , there is no central system of control , but that is only because the government lacks the capacity .
According to the 2014 plan , by this year , China should have “ basically ” completed “ a credit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ credit information and resource sharing.
” Vox reports China has a grading system for people from A to D. Ds are “ untrustworthy.
” “ Citizens can earn points for good deeds like volunteering , donating blood , or attracting investments to the city , ” said the MIT Technology Review in 2019 .
“ They can lose them for offenses like breaking traffic rules , evading taxes , or neglecting to care for their elderly parents.
” Taking seats on public transportation reserved for old people or doing anything the South China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can also cost points .
You can lose points for playing video games too often , buying too much alcohol , arguing at check-in counters , boarding a train without a ticket , getting into a fight , posting stickers hostile to the government , or letting chickens out of their coop .
You can lose your dog if you walk it too often without a leash or if it bothers people .
NPR reports that “ if you spread rumors online ” you could lose points , and even “ spending frivolously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ punishes some things just as we do in the United States .
If you drive drunk in China , you lose points .
If you drive drunk in America , you can lose your license .
How does the system find out all this about you ?
The Chinese track people through a combination of cameras , facial recognition software , spies , and data from tech and social media companies .
There are an estimated 626 million security cameras in China , capturing all sorts of behavior .
The Straits Times reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recognized her face , and immediately put her photo up on a video screen above the street , along with her name and past infractions .
The Chinese use drones disguised as birds .
There are groups of paid government informers .
In one case , a group of senior citizens called the Chaoyang Masses supposedly tracked behavior , though some people thought the group was questionable .
This could be a feature of the system ; you don ’ t know who is watching .
The New York Times reported in 2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ professors .
Companies such as Alibaba and Tencent track your online activity , and you can lose points if you publish political opinions without permission or talk about certain issues such as Tiananmen Square .
You also lose points if your friends commit infractions ; collective punishment helps isolate dissidents and discourage others .
However , you can gain points if you parrot the government line .
Some of this is self-reported and checked against data held by the government , tech companies , and surveillance records .
There is an app called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s scores .
It is voluntary for now but will eventually be mandatory .
“ Trust-breakers ” go on an online “ blacklist ” that anyone can search .
“ Trust-keepers ” go on an equivalent “ redlist.
” Everyone ’ s behavior is public , and the authorities encourage citizens to compete with each other to get good scores .
Good citizens can get discounts on energy bills , better returns on bank deposits , and can rent bikes or hotel rooms without paying deposits .
Local officials praise them publicly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get cut-rate public transportation .
Depending on the locale , if your credit score reaches 600 , you can take out an instant loan of about $ 800 without collateral when shopping online .
At a score of 650 , you can rent a car without a deposit .
At 700 , you get priority for a Singapore travel permit , and at 750 , you are on the fast track for a coveted Schengen visa for 28 European countries .
Punishments include banning you or your children from top schools , barring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hotels , and preventing you from buying high-speed train or air tickets .
Businesses also get grades on , for example , whether their advertising is deceptive .
If their grades are too low , they can ’ t issue bonds or bid in land auctions .
There ’ s a financial aspect to the system .
It costs points if a person or business fails to repay a loan .
We have credit scores , too .
The difference is that the Chinese government can — and does — deduct points for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business or family out of normal activity for saying the wrong things .
Your social credit “ grade ” could wreck your life .
If the system is fully imposed , it would be terrifying to be a D. China does not yet have a centralized , all-encompassing system .
Different government agencies , localities , regions , and private companies share information and have different programs , rewards , and penalties .
Two years ago , Foreign Policy explained that “ unless people are sole proprietors or company representatives , have taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the law , or defaulted on a court judgment , they ’ re unlikely to be in the social credit database.
” China wants to get all 1.4 billion people into the system .
Since China routed the Hong Kong autonomy movement , the system will surely spread there too .
“ All regions and departments should have ideological unity , ” says the plan .
China is working hard in two areas that will help it control its people .
The first is artificial intelligence to manage vast amounts of data .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in AI systems , and that battle could help determine who rules this century .
Collecting enormous amounts of data on citizens will mean finely detailed control .
The second area is digital currency .
China is already experimenting with a digital yuan .
Most people in China already use mobile apps for transactions , not cash .
A full record of transactions , combined with AI , means tremendous government power to track individual behavior and modify social credit scores .
A “ cashless , ” total-social-credit China could be a prison @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or selling , no political opposition ( “ ideological unity ” ) , and little privacy .
However , citizens would be forced to fulfill basic duties such as taking care of families and paying bills .
They would be rewarded for helping their communities .
The Chinese Communist Party would succeed in turning the people it rules into typical petit bourgeois with conservative norms .
The Chinese government wants to “ broadly shape a strong atmosphere in the entire society that keeping trust is glorious and breaking trust is disgraceful .
.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ China wants a high-trust society .
Diversity destroys trust , as white advocates often point out .
China is working to overcome this problem by replacing Tibetans and Uighurs with Han Chinese .
The government is also Sinicizing these areas , especially by suppressing Islam .
A faithful Muslim should rebel against these policies , but a Han Chinese sees this as protecting national interests .
We have the equivalent of a social credit system in the United States .
It just has different incentives .
You can lose your job for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Political dissidents find they can no longer use PayPal or even banks .
Twitter bans people with whom it disagrees , while users with verified accounts can make threatening or violent statements .
“ Spreading rumors ” or “ conspiracy theories ” is cause for social media to boot you .
Some journalists spend time hunting down people who spread “ conspiracy theories.
” If journalists or trolls decide that your small business or video channel needs to be deplatformed , they can complain to tech companies , and once you are off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many people , that means loss of livelihood .
Power-hungry people invent new forms of social credit all the time .
Democrats have started a Trump Accountability Project so that Trump supporters can “ never serve in office , join a corporate board , find a faculty position or be accepted into ‘ polite ’ society.
” With a remarkable new website called Donor.Watch , you can find out exactly how much your neighbors ( or anyone in the country ) gave to any of the 2020 candidates .
The tools are there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to harass or intimidate Trump supporters .
Social media , which let ordinary people express themselves and were originally to be bastions of free speech , have taken it upon themselves to determine what is official information .
Even now , Twitter is censoring President Trump , and Facebook is removing Trump supporters and their groups .
You can ’ t cast an informed vote or express yourself if you can ’ t learn or speak the truth .
In his book Deleted , Allum Bokhari showed Google ’ s power to direct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stories it doesn ’ t want covered .
While the Democrats often say tech companies don ’ t censor enough , they at least recognize their power .
A House Judiciary Committee report recently found that Amazon , Alphabet ( Google/YouTube ) , Apple , and Facebook use monopoly power to suppress competition .
President Trump ’ s Department of Justice recently sued Google , calling it the “ gatekeeper of the Internet.
” Conservatives banned from the big platforms can go elsewhere , but what happens when Parler and Gab lose their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bank accounts ?
Will we have to build our own banks and internet ?
Our system is not exclusively punitive .
The American system encourages banks to lend to non-whites with doubtful credit .
There is a broad set of incentives to promote minority — especially black — bank ownership , even as black banks keep going under because they keep lending money to dubious black borrowers .
Social media openly promote Black Lives Matter , and every minority cause , holiday , and celebration .
Book sellers direct you to endless titles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Chinese version , American social credit is not state run and is even less centralized than China ’ s .
However , it ’ s not true that the state has no involvement .
Acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan admitted in 2019 that although the government can not act as a censor , it expects to work with tech companies and “ watchdog groups ” to force ideas it doesn ’ t like off the internet .
The Republicans have done hardly anything about this .
An @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unlike Xi Jinping , can ’ t issue orders through the bureaucracy and expect obedience .
Perhaps President Trump lacks the will .
Kamala Harris , probably the next vice president , appears to have plenty of it .
She wants to give the FBI millions of dollars to “ more vigilantly monitor white nationalist websites ” and “ put pressure on online platforms to take down content that violates their terms and conditions.
” Under a Biden/Harris White House , the partnership between state and media would therefore grow stronger .
Like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take it for granted that not only traditional media should promote certain stories and suppress others , but “ open ” social media should do the same .
The American system increasingly resembles the Chinese , with ideology imposed from the top .
We do not have single-party rule in the United States , but we do when it comes to white interests .
Republicans and Democrats unanimously blamed “ White nationalists , white supremacists , the Ku Klux Klan , neo-Nazis and other hate groups ” for violence at the Unite the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antifa were not even there — even though local officials deliberately forced demonstrators and antifa together so that violence would be an excuse to shut down a legal rally .
There may be two parties , but both agree that whites must not promote their collective interests in the streets or online .
Just as the Chinese system punishes people for associating with low-scoring trust-breakers , the media and “ watchdog ” groups love to publicize “ links.
” The Washington Post recently revealed in an indignant article that a Trump Interior Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AmRen.com .
American dissidents routinely use pen names , and “ respectable ” people keep their relations with them secret .
In some respects , an openly authoritarian government is better than our system .
It ’ s clear who is in charge .
Citizens know who rules them .
It ’ s easier to remove a tyrant because you can always march on the palace or the party HQ .
If you are ruled by a dictator , king , or party , you also know what the rules are ; if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trouble .
Our system is much more diffuse and therefore much harder to fight or even understand .
Private companies , on a whim , can shut down your social media account , refuse to sell your books , make it impossible for your business to take credit cards , and close your bank account .
You have no recourse , not even to the courts .
Each company has its own inconsistent , arbitrary , ever-changing rules .
Now , they all say , in effect , “ We ’ ll kick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like you.
” And that ’ s what they do .
If there were legal censorship , there would be laws that limited free speech .
They might be vague and inconsistently enforced , but there would be rules .
If the court system had any integrity , there could be litigation and legal appeals .
In our system , every person you know is a potential commissar .
If you become the subject of a “ viral ” story , literally millions of people can turn against you .
This is “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chinese face .
Their system is authoritarian , but it has this crucial difference from ours : It pushes people to behave correctly .
In our Anglo-American tradition , personal virtue is the guarantor of our liberties , so we don ’ t need overarching government .
However , we are no longer virtuous , at least not in the way the Founders understood virtue .
Instead , anti-racism has become America ’ s moral code , and blacks are semi-sacred .
Any social interaction with a non-white can be a life-changing disaster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The rules for what is politically correct change so quickly no one can be sure what to say to avoid trouble .
We ’ re in an absurd system in which groups that enjoy government mandated “ affirmative action ” lecture us about our privilege .
Although “ racism ” is the main sin our social credit system punishes there are others : “ homophobia , ” “ Islamophobia , ” “ misogyny , ” “ xenophobia , ” with more new ones invented all the time .
While the Chinese social credit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — society , ours makes it worse .
The media feed non-whites moral arguments to use against whites , whether they are about “ racist ” police , “ systemic racism , ” or “ far-right extremists.
” Anyone non-white , from educated elites to illiterate thugs , can feel justified in attacking middle-class whites because the only explanation for inequality is white racism .
Thus , our system doesn ’ t build “ mutual trust ” but suspicion and even hatred .
Instead of building national unity , the American system undermines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our history and heroes were racist and evil .
The Chinese system punishes destructive behavior and rewards charity .
The American system winks at destructive behavior such as BLM rioting , and rewards “ virtue signaling , ” not real virtue .
White-owned business can be deplatfromed online and some can be ransacked by radicals , with no interference from the police .
The right even to self-defense is under attack ( ask Kyle Rittenhouse or Mark and Patricia McCloskey ) .
In some areas , people can not gather to demonstrate or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BLM protesters can do almost anything with impunity .
Can we honestly say we have more freedom than the Chinese ?
Can we say that our government pursues our interests or protects our rights ?
Can we trust technology companies and major media ?
Are our elites pushing us towards greatness or towards dispossession and pariah status ?
Still , we do have advantages .
The great strength of the American Social Credit System is that it is ad hoc and unofficial .
It ’ s hard to know exactly what or whom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its weakness .
There are “ gaps ” in the system we can exploit .
At the same time , our rulers ’ lust for power is clearer than ever .
Donald Trump , however half-hearted and bumbling , forced our opponents to reveal their snarling hatreds and their breathtaking arrogance in believing they have the right to control what we read , hear , watch , and think .
We still have rights .
American Renaissance sued the state of Tennessee , and won the right to use public facilities without paying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies .
We are creating new ways of donating and accepting money , spreading our message , and building new platforms .
These aren ’ t temporary workarounds , but steps towards community- and even nation-building .
They are forcing us to do the things we should have been doing anyway .
What should a healthy society want ?
Perhaps every advanced society will have a formal or informal Social Credit System .
Elites always try to control information , capital , and behavior .
When we take control of our own destiny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and virtue .
We are a freedom-loving people , so I believe that if we slough off this current system , we can achieve these goals without repression .
Who rules the United States ?
I ’ d argue it ’ s media and Big Tech .
They decide who can speak in the public square , raise money , do business online , or enjoy the full protection of law .
They encourage victimhood instead of heroism , and distrust instead of unity .
China ’ s system promotes positive values @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them towards positive ends .
It ’ s hard not to feel envious .
The greatest threat to white Americans certainly isn ’ t Beijing .
It ’ s those who presume to rule us , holding us captive , trapping us behind a blue screen .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material @ @

By Gregory Hood,
China is notorious for a “Social Credit System” that controls the lives of citizens, rewarding what the authorities want and punishing what they don’t. The United States has a social credit system, too, even if we don’t call it that. And ours is worse.
The Chinese system tries to build social trust. Ours destroys trust. The Chinese system defends the interests of the Han, the ethnic group that built and sustains Chinese civilization. Our system hurts whites. The Chinese system encourages charity, good citizenship, and patriotism. Ours incites hatred and spreads bitterness and division.
The Chinese government’s goals are clear: According to a 2014 planning document, the state wants to build a “social credit environment of honesty, self-discipline, trustworthiness, and mutual trust.” Despite the reputation of the Chinese Communist Party, there is no central system of control, but that is only because the government lacks the capacity. According to the 2014 plan, by this year, China should have “basically” completed “a credit investigation system covering the entire society with credit information and resource sharing.”
Vox reports China has a grading system for people from A to D. Ds are “untrustworthy.” “Citizens can earn points for good deeds like volunteering, donating blood, or attracting investments to the city,” said the MIT Technology Review in 2019. “They can lose them for offenses like breaking traffic rules, evading taxes, or neglecting to care for their elderly parents.” Taking seats on public transportation reserved for old people or doing anything the South China Morning Post called “uncivilized behavior” can also cost points.
You can lose points for playing video games too often, buying too much alcohol, arguing at check-in counters, boarding a train without a ticket, getting into a fight, posting stickers hostile to the government, or letting chickens out of their coop. You can lose your dog if you walk it too often without a leash or if it bothers people. NPR reports that “if you spread rumors online” you could lose points, and even “spending frivolously” can cost points. The system punishes some things just as we do in the United States. If you drive drunk in China, you lose points. If you drive drunk in America, you can lose your license.
How does the system find out all this about you? The Chinese track people through a combination of cameras, facial recognition software, spies, and data from tech and social media companies. There are an estimated 626 million security cameras in China, capturing all sorts of behavior. The Straits Times reported that cameras caught a citizen jaywalking, recognized her face, and immediately put her photo up on a video screen above the street, along with her name and past infractions. The Chinese use drones disguised as birds.
There are groups of paid government informers. In one case, a group of senior citizens called the Chaoyang Masses supposedly tracked behavior, though some people thought the group was questionable. This could be a feature of the system; you don’t know who is watching. The New York Times reported in 2019 that the government uses students to track professors.
Companies such as Alibaba and Tencent track your online activity, and you can lose points if you publish political opinions without permission or talk about certain issues such as Tiananmen Square. You also lose points if your friends commit infractions; collective punishment helps isolate dissidents and discourage others. However, you can gain points if you parrot the government line. Some of this is self-reported and checked against data held by the government, tech companies, and surveillance records. There is an app called Sesame Credit that lets you track people’s scores. It is voluntary for now but will eventually be mandatory.
“Trust-breakers” go on an online “blacklist” that anyone can search. “Trust-keepers” go on an equivalent “redlist.” Everyone’s behavior is public, and the authorities encourage citizens to compete with each other to get good scores.
Good citizens can get discounts on energy bills, better returns on bank deposits, and can rent bikes or hotel rooms without paying deposits. Local officials praise them publicly. In Suzhou, “trust-keepers” get cut-rate public transportation.
Depending on the locale, if your credit score reaches 600, you can take out an instant loan of about $800 without collateral when shopping online. At a score of 650, you can rent a car without a deposit. At 700, you get priority for a Singapore travel permit, and at 750, you are on the fast track for a coveted Schengen visa for 28 European countries.
Punishments include banning you or your children from top schools, barring you from top jobs and the best hotels, and preventing you from buying high-speed train or air tickets.
Businesses also get grades on, for example, whether their advertising is deceptive. If their grades are too low, they can’t issue bonds or bid in land auctions.
There’s a financial aspect to the system. It costs points if a person or business fails to repay a loan. We have credit scores, too. The difference is that the Chinese government can — and does — deduct points for political reasons. It could cut a business or family out of normal activity for saying the wrong things. Your social credit “grade” could wreck your life.
If the system is fully imposed, it would be terrifying to be a D. China does not yet have a centralized, all-encompassing system. Different government agencies, localities, regions, and private companies share information and have different programs, rewards, and penalties. Two years ago, Foreign Policy explained that “unless people are sole proprietors or company representatives, have taken a loan or credit card, violated the law, or defaulted on a court judgment, they’re unlikely to be in the social credit database.”
China wants to get all 1.4 billion people into the system. Since China routed the Hong Kong autonomy movement, the system will surely spread there too. “All regions and departments should have ideological unity,” says the plan.
China is working hard in two areas that will help it control its people. The first is artificial intelligence to manage vast amounts of data. The United States and China are competing in AI systems, and that battle could help determine who rules this century. Collecting enormous amounts of data on citizens will mean finely detailed control.
The second area is digital currency. China is already experimenting with a digital yuan. Most people in China already use mobile apps for transactions, not cash. A full record of transactions, combined with AI, means tremendous government power to track individual behavior and modify social credit scores.
A “cashless,” total-social-credit China could be a prison. It would mean no unauthorized buying or selling, no political opposition (“ideological unity”), and little privacy. However, citizens would be forced to fulfill basic duties such as taking care of families and paying bills. They would be rewarded for helping their communities. The Chinese Communist Party would succeed in turning the people it rules into typical petit bourgeois with conservative norms.
The Chinese government wants to “broadly shape a strong atmosphere in the entire society that keeping trust is glorious and breaking trust is disgraceful . . . .” In other words, China wants a high-trust society.
Diversity destroys trust, as white advocates often point out. China is working to overcome this problem by replacing Tibetans and Uighurs with Han Chinese. The government is also Sinicizing these areas, especially by suppressing Islam. A faithful Muslim should rebel against these policies, but a Han Chinese sees this as protecting national interests.
We have the equivalent of a social credit system in the United States. It just has different incentives. You can lose your job for a politically incorrect remark caught on camera. Political dissidents find they can no longer use PayPal or even banks. Twitter bans people with whom it disagrees, while users with verified accounts can make threatening or violent statements.
“Spreading rumors” or “conspiracy theories” is cause for social media to boot you. Some journalists spend time hunting down people who spread “conspiracy theories.” If journalists or trolls decide that your small business or video channel needs to be deplatformed, they can complain to tech companies, and once you are off, there is no appeal. For many people, that means loss of livelihood.
Power-hungry people invent new forms of social credit all the time. Democrats have started a Trump Accountability Project so that Trump supporters can “never serve in office, join a corporate board, find a faculty position or be accepted into ‘polite’ society.” With a remarkable new website called Donor.Watch, you can find out exactly how much your neighbors (or anyone in the country) gave to any of the 2020 candidates. The tools are there for Democrats to set up shaming mobs to harass or intimidate Trump supporters.
Social media, which let ordinary people express themselves and were originally to be bastions of free speech, have taken it upon themselves to determine what is official information. Even now, Twitter is censoring President Trump, and Facebook is removing Trump supporters and their groups.
You can’t cast an informed vote or express yourself if you can’t learn or speak the truth. In his book Deleted, Allum Bokhari showed Google’s power to direct information, sway votes, and bury stories it doesn’t want covered. While the Democrats often say tech companies don’t censor enough, they at least recognize their power. A House Judiciary Committee report recently found that Amazon, Alphabet (Google/YouTube), Apple, and Facebook use monopoly power to suppress competition. President Trump’s Department of Justice recently sued Google, calling it the “gatekeeper of the Internet.”
Conservatives banned from the big platforms can go elsewhere, but what happens when Parler and Gab lose their payment processors or servers or even their bank accounts? Will we have to build our own banks and internet?
Our system is not exclusively punitive. The American system encourages banks to lend to non-whites with doubtful credit. There is a broad set of incentives to promote minority — especially black — bank ownership, even as black banks keep going under because they keep lending money to dubious black borrowers.
Social media openly promote Black Lives Matter, and every minority cause, holiday, and celebration. Book sellers direct you to endless titles on anti-racism and white privilege.
Unlike the Chinese version, American social credit is not state run and is even less centralized than China’s. However, it’s not true that the state has no involvement. Acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan admitted in 2019 that although the government cannot act as a censor, it expects to work with tech companies and “watchdog groups” to force ideas it doesn’t like off the internet.
The Republicans have done hardly anything about this. An American president is relatively weak, and unlike Xi Jinping, can’t issue orders through the bureaucracy and expect obedience. Perhaps President Trump lacks the will. Kamala Harris, probably the next vice president, appears to have plenty of it. She wants to give the FBI millions of dollars to “more vigilantly monitor white nationalist websites” and “put pressure on online platforms to take down content that violates their terms and conditions.”
Under a Biden/Harris White House, the partnership between state and media would therefore grow stronger. Like Chinese officials, many Democrats and journalists take it for granted that not only traditional media should promote certain stories and suppress others, but “open” social media should do the same. The American system increasingly resembles the Chinese, with ideology imposed from the top.
We do not have single-party rule in the United States, but we do when it comes to white interests. Republicans and Democrats unanimously blamed “White nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis and other hate groups” for violence at the Unite the Right rally in 2017 — as if antifa were not even there — even though local officials deliberately forced demonstrators and antifa together so that violence would be an excuse to shut down a legal rally. There may be two parties, but both agree that whites must not promote their collective interests in the streets or online.
Just as the Chinese system punishes people for associating with low-scoring trust-breakers, the media and “watchdog” groups love to publicize “links.” The Washington Post recently revealed in an indignant article that a Trump Interior Department official had linked to an article at AmRen.com. American dissidents routinely use pen names, and “respectable” people keep their relations with them secret.
In some respects, an openly authoritarian government is better than our system. It’s clear who is in charge. Citizens know who rules them. It’s easier to remove a tyrant because you can always march on the palace or the party HQ. If you are ruled by a dictator, king, or party, you also know what the rules are; if you follow them, you can avoid trouble.
Our system is much more diffuse and therefore much harder to fight or even understand. Private companies, on a whim, can shut down your social media account, refuse to sell your books, make it impossible for your business to take credit cards, and close your bank account. You have no recourse, not even to the courts. Each company has its own inconsistent, arbitrary, ever-changing rules. Now, they all say, in effect, “We’ll kick you out if we don’t like you.” And that’s what they do.
If there were legal censorship, there would be laws that limited free speech. They might be vague and inconsistently enforced, but there would be rules. If the court system had any integrity, there could be litigation and legal appeals. In our system, every person you know is a potential commissar. If you become the subject of a “viral” story, literally millions of people can turn against you. This is “public shaming” worse than anything the Chinese face.
Their system is authoritarian, but it has this crucial difference from ours: It pushes people to behave correctly. In our Anglo-American tradition, personal virtue is the guarantor of our liberties, so we don’t need overarching government. However, we are no longer virtuous, at least not in the way the Founders understood virtue. Instead, anti-racism has become America’s moral code, and blacks are semi-sacred. Any social interaction with a non-white can be a life-changing disaster if it is caught on camera. The rules for what is politically correct change so quickly no one can be sure what to say to avoid trouble. We’re in an absurd system in which groups that enjoy government mandated “affirmative action” lecture us about our privilege. Although “racism” is the main sin our social credit system punishes there are others: “homophobia,” “Islamophobia,” “misogyny,” “xenophobia,” with more new ones invented all the time.
While the Chinese social credit system builds a better — if regimented — society, ours makes it worse. The media feed non-whites moral arguments to use against whites, whether they are about “racist” police, “systemic racism,” or “far-right extremists.” Anyone non-white, from educated elites to illiterate thugs, can feel justified in attacking middle-class whites because the only explanation for inequality is white racism.
Thus, our system doesn’t build “mutual trust” but suspicion and even hatred. Instead of building national unity, the American system undermines the foundation of patriotism by telling us our history and heroes were racist and evil. The Chinese system punishes destructive behavior and rewards charity. The American system winks at destructive behavior such as BLM rioting, and rewards “virtue signaling,” not real virtue.
White-owned business can be deplatfromed online and some can be ransacked by radicals, with no interference from the police. The right even to self-defense is under attack (ask Kyle Rittenhouse or Mark and Patricia McCloskey). In some areas, people cannot gather to demonstrate or even to worship, while antifa and BLM protesters can do almost anything with impunity.
Can we honestly say we have more freedom than the Chinese? Can we say that our government pursues our interests or protects our rights? Can we trust technology companies and major media? Are our elites pushing us towards greatness or towards dispossession and pariah status?
Still, we do have advantages. The great strength of the American Social Credit System is that it is ad hoc and unofficial. It’s hard to know exactly what or whom to attack but that’s also its weakness. There are “gaps” in the system we can exploit. At the same time, our rulers’ lust for power is clearer than ever. Donald Trump, however half-hearted and bumbling, forced our opponents to reveal their snarling hatreds and their breathtaking arrogance in believing they have the right to control what we read, hear, watch, and think.
We still have rights. American Renaissance sued the state of Tennessee, and won the right to use public facilities without paying for security. Others are suing tech companies. We are creating new ways of donating and accepting money, spreading our message, and building new platforms. These aren’t temporary workarounds, but steps towards community- and even nation-building. They are forcing us to do the things we should have been doing anyway.
What should a healthy society want? Perhaps every advanced society will have a formal or informal Social Credit System. Elites always try to control information, capital, and behavior. When we take control of our own destiny, we will promote strength, beauty, and virtue. We are a freedom-loving people, so I believe that if we slough off this current system, we can achieve these goals without repression.
Who rules the United States? I’d argue it’s media and Big Tech. They decide who can speak in the public square, raise money, do business online, or enjoy the full protection of law. They encourage victimhood instead of heroism, and distrust instead of unity. China’s system promotes positive values, exalts its people, and directs them towards positive ends.
It’s hard not to feel envious. The greatest threat to white Americans certainly isn’t Beijing. It’s those who presume to rule us, holding us captive, trapping us behind a blue screen.
Source: https://www.unz.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-11-22--The United Nations and the Origins of “The Great Reset”

About twenty-four hundred years ago , the Greek philosopher Plato came up with the idea constructing the state and society according to an elaborate plan .
Plato wanted “ wise men ” ( philosophers ) at the helm of the government , but he made it also clear that his kind of state would need a transformation of the humans .
In modern times , the promoters of the omnipotent state want to substitute Plato ’ s philosopher with the expert and create the new man through eugenics , which is now called transhumanism .
The United Nations and its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this project which has reached its present stage in the project of the Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset .
The Great Reset did not come from nowhere .
The first modern attempts to create a global institution with a governmental function was launched by the government of Woodrow Wilson who acted as US president from 1913 to 1921 .
Under the inspiration of Colonel Mandell House , the president ’ s prime advisor and best friend , Wilson wanted to establish a world forum for the period after World War I .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the League of Nations failed and the drive toward internationalism and establishing a new world order receded during the Roaring Twenties .
A new move toward managing a society like an organization , however , came during the Great Depression .
Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not let the crisis go by without driving the agenda forward with his “ New Deal.
” FDR was especially interested in the special executive privileges that came with the Second World War .
Resistance was almost nil when he moved forward to lay the groundwork for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now to be named the United Nations .
Under the leadership of Stalin , Churchill , and Roosevelt , twenty-six nations agreed in January 1942 to the initiative of establishing a United Nations Organization ( UNO ) , which came into existence on October 24 , 1945 .
Since its inception , the United Nations and its branches , such as the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , have prepared the countries of the world to comply with the goals that were announced at its foundation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ international peace and security , ” “ developing friendly relations among nations , ” and working for “ social progress , better living standards , and human rights ” hides the agenda of establishing a world government with executive powers whose task would not be promoting liberty and free markets but greater interventionism and control through cultural and scientific organizations .
This became clear with the creation of the United Nations Educational , Scientific and Cultural Organization ( UNESCO ) in 1945 .
After the foundation of UNESCO in 1945 , the English @ @ @ @ @ @ @ globalist Julian Huxley ( the brother of Aldous Huxley , author of Brave New World ) became its first director .
At the launch of the organization , Huxley called for a “ scientific world humanism , global in extent ” ( p. 8 ) and asked to manipulate human evolution to a “ desirable ” end .
Referring to dialectical materialism as “ the first radical attempt at an evolutionary philosophy ” ( p. 11 ) , the director of UNESCO laments that the Marxist approach to changing society was bound to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indispensable “ biological component.
” With these ideas , Julian Huxley was in respectable company .
Since the late nineteenth century , the call for the genetic betterment of the human race through eugenics has been gaining many prominent followers .
John Maynard Keynes , for example , held the promotion of eugenics and population control as one the most important social questions and a crucial area of research .
Keynes was not alone .
The list of advocates of breeding the human race for its own betterment is quite large and impressive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , among many other well-known names , the writers H.G .
Wells and G.B .
Shaw , US president Theodore Roosevelt , and British prime minister Winston Churchill as well as the economist Irving Fisher and the family-planning pioneers Margaret Sanger and Bill Gates Sr. , the father of Bill Gates , Microsoft cofounder and head of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
In his discourse at the foundation of the UNESCO , Julian Huxley was quite specific about the goals and methods of this institution .
To achieve the desired “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first step must be to stress “ the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.
” Furthermore , the institution must consider the tradeoff between the “ importance of quality as against quantity ” ( p. 14 ) , which means it must take into account that there is , “ an optimum range of size for every human organization as for every type of organism ” ( p. 15 ) .
The educational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the UN should give special attention to “ unity-in-variety of the world ’ s art and culture as well as the promotion of one single pool of scientific knowledge ” ( p 17 ) .
Huxley makes it clear that human diversity is not for all .
Variety for “ weaklings , fools , and moral deficients… can not but be bad , ” and because a “ considerable percentage of the population is not capable of profiting from higher education ” and also a “ considerable percentage of young men ” suffer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and “ these grounds are often genetic in origin ” ( p. 20 ) , these groups must be excluded from the efforts of advancing human progress .
In his discourse , Huxley diagnosed that at the time of his writing the “ indirect effect of civilization ” is rather “ dysgenic instead of eugenic ” and that “ in any case , it seems likely that the deadweight of genetic stupidity , physical weakness , mental instability , and disease-proneness , which already exist in the human species , will prove @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be achieved ” ( p. 21 ) .
After all , it is “ essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science , for as already indicated , in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent ; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics ” ( pp .
37–38 ) .
Use of the Climate Threat The next decisive step toward the global economic transformation was taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Rome .
In 1968 , the Club of Rome was initiated at the Rockefeller estate Bellagio in Italy .
Its first report was published in 1972 under the title “ The Limits to Growth.
” The president emeritus of the Club of Rome , Alexander King , and the secretary of the club , General Bertrand Schneider , inform in their Report of the Council of the Club of Rome that when the members of the club were in search of identifying a new enemy , they listed pollution , global warming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most opportune items to be blamed on humanity with the implication that humanity itself must be reduced to keep these threats in check .
Since the 1990s , several comprehensive initiatives toward a global system of control have been undertaken by the United Nations with Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030 .
The 2030 Agenda was adopted by all United Nations member states in 2015 .
It launched its blueprint for global change with the call to achieve seventeen sustainable development goals ( SDGs ) .
The key concept is “ sustainable development @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crucial instrument .
Saving the earth has become the slogan of green policy warriors .
Since the 1970s , the horror scenario of global warming has been a useful tool in their hands to gain political influence and finally rule over public discourse .
In the meanwhile , these anticapitalist groups have obtained a dominant influence in the media , the educational and judicial systems , and have become major players in the political arena .
In many countries , particularly in Europe , the so-called green parties have become a pivotal factor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the representatives are quite open in their demands to make society and the economy compatible with high ecological standards that require a profound reset of the present system .
In 1945 , Huxley ( p. 21 ) noted that it is too early to propose outright a eugenic depopulation program but advised that it will be important for the organization “ to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care , and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s caution is no longer necessary .
In the meantime , the branches of the United Nations have gained such a level of power that even originally minor UN suborganizations such as the World Health Organization ( WHO ) have been enabled to command individual governments around the world to obey their orders .
The WHO and the International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) —whose conditionality for loans has changed from fiscal restraint to the degree to which a country follows the rules set by the WHO—have become the supreme tandem to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As Julian Huxley pointed out in his discourse in 1945 , it is the task of the United Nations to do away with economic freedom , because “ laisser-faire and capitalist economic systems ” have “ created a great deal of ugliness ” ( p. 38 ) .
The time has come to work toward the emergence “ of a single world culture ” ( p. 61 ) .
This must be done with the explicit help of the mass media and the educational systems .
With the foundation of the United @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to advance the programs of eugenics and transhumanism took a big step forward .
Together with the activities of the Club of Rome , they have stage to initiate the great reset that is going on currently .
With the pronouncement of a pandemic , the goal of comprehensive government control of the economy and society has taken another leap toward transforming the economy and society .
Freedom faces a new enemy .
The tyranny comes under the disguise of expert rule and benevolent dictatorship .
The new rulers do not justify their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but now claim the right to rule the people in the name of universal health and safety based on presumed scientific evidence .

By Antony P. Mueller,
About twenty-four hundred years ago, the Greek philosopher Plato came up with the idea constructing the state and society according to an elaborate plan. Plato wanted “wise men” (philosophers) at the helm of the government, but he made it also clear that his kind of state would need a transformation of the humans. In modern times, the promoters of the omnipotent state want to substitute Plato’s philosopher with the expert and create the new man through eugenics, which is now called transhumanism. The United Nations and its various suborganizations play a pivotal role in this project which has reached its present stage in the project of the Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset.
The Struggle for a World Government
The Great Reset did not come from nowhere. The first modern attempts to create a global institution with a governmental function was launched by the government of Woodrow Wilson who acted as US president from 1913 to 1921. Under the inspiration of Colonel Mandell House, the president’s prime advisor and best friend, Wilson wanted to establish a world forum for the period after World War I. Yet the plan of American participation in the League of Nations failed and the drive toward internationalism and establishing a new world order receded during the Roaring Twenties.
A new move toward managing a society like an organization, however, came during the Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not let the crisis go by without driving the agenda forward with his “New Deal.” FDR was especially interested in the special executive privileges that came with the Second World War. Resistance was almost nil when he moved forward to lay the groundwork for a new League of Nations, which was now to be named the United Nations.
Under the leadership of Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, twenty-six nations agreed in January 1942 to the initiative of establishing a United Nations Organization (UNO), which came into existence on October 24, 1945. Since its inception, the United Nations and its branches, such as the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization (WHO), have prepared the countries of the world to comply with the goals that were announced at its foundation.
Yet the unctuous pronouncements of promoting “international peace and security,” “developing friendly relations among nations,” and working for “social progress, better living standards, and human rights” hides the agenda of establishing a world government with executive powers whose task would not be promoting liberty and free markets but greater interventionism and control through cultural and scientific organizations. This became clear with the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1945.
Eugenics
After the foundation of UNESCO in 1945, the English evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and declared globalist Julian Huxley (the brother of Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World) became its first director.
At the launch of the organization, Huxley called for a “scientific world humanism, global in extent” (p. 8) and asked to manipulate human evolution to a “desirable” end. Referring to dialectical materialism as “the first radical attempt at an evolutionary philosophy” (p. 11), the director of UNESCO laments that the Marxist approach to changing society was bound to fail because of its lack of an indispensable “biological component.”
With these ideas, Julian Huxley was in respectable company. Since the late nineteenth century, the call for the genetic betterment of the human race through eugenics has been gaining many prominent followers. John Maynard Keynes, for example, held the promotion of eugenics and population control as one the most important social questions and a crucial area of research.
Keynes was not alone. The list of advocates of breeding the human race for its own betterment is quite large and impressive. These “illiberal reformers” include, among many other well-known names, the writers H.G. Wells and G.B. Shaw, US president Theodore Roosevelt, and British prime minister Winston Churchill as well as the economist Irving Fisher and the family-planning pioneers Margaret Sanger and Bill Gates Sr., the father of Bill Gates, Microsoft cofounder and head of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
In his discourse at the foundation of the UNESCO, Julian Huxley was quite specific about the goals and methods of this institution. To achieve the desired “evolutionary progress” of mankind, the first step must be to stress “the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.”
Furthermore, the institution must consider the tradeoff between the “importance of quality as against quantity” (p. 14), which means it must take into account that there is, “an optimum range of size for every human organization as for every type of organism” (p. 15). The educational, scientific, and cultural organization of the UN should give special attention to “unity-in-variety of the world’s art and culture as well as the promotion of one single pool of scientific knowledge” (p 17).
Huxley makes it clear that human diversity is not for all. Variety for “weaklings, fools, and moral deficients…cannot but be bad,” and because a “considerable percentage of the population is not capable of profiting from higher education” and also a “considerable percentage of young men” suffer from “physical weakness or mental instability” and “these grounds are often genetic in origin” (p. 20), these groups must be excluded from the efforts of advancing human progress.
In his discourse, Huxley diagnosed that at the time of his writing the “indirect effect of civilization” is rather “dysgenic instead of eugenic” and that “in any case, it seems likely that the deadweight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved” (p. 21). After all, it is “essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics” (pp. 37–38).
Use of the Climate Threat
The next decisive step toward the global economic transformation was taken with the first report of the Club of Rome. In 1968, the Club of Rome was initiated at the Rockefeller estate Bellagio in Italy. Its first report was published in 1972 under the title “The Limits to Growth.”
The president emeritus of the Club of Rome, Alexander King, and the secretary of the club, General Bertrand Schneider, inform in their Report of the Council of the Club of Rome that when the members of the club were in search of identifying a new enemy, they listed pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famines as the most opportune items to be blamed on humanity with the implication that humanity itself must be reduced to keep these threats in check.
Since the 1990s, several comprehensive initiatives toward a global system of control have been undertaken by the United Nations with Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030. The 2030 Agenda was adopted by all United Nations member states in 2015. It launched its blueprint for global change with the call to achieve seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs). The key concept is “sustainable development” that includes population control as a crucial instrument.
Saving the earth has become the slogan of green policy warriors. Since the 1970s, the horror scenario of global warming has been a useful tool in their hands to gain political influence and finally rule over public discourse. In the meanwhile, these anticapitalist groups have obtained a dominant influence in the media, the educational and judicial systems, and have become major players in the political arena.
In many countries, particularly in Europe, the so-called green parties have become a pivotal factor in the political system. Many of the representatives are quite open in their demands to make society and the economy compatible with high ecological standards that require a profound reset of the present system.
In 1945, Huxley (p. 21) noted that it is too early to propose outright a eugenic depopulation program but advised that it will be important for the organization “to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Huxley’s caution is no longer necessary. In the meantime, the branches of the United Nations have gained such a level of power that even originally minor UN suborganizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) have been enabled to command individual governments around the world to obey their orders. The WHO and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)—whose conditionality for loans has changed from fiscal restraint to the degree to which a country follows the rules set by the WHO—have become the supreme tandem to work toward establishing the new world order.
As Julian Huxley pointed out in his discourse in 1945, it is the task of the United Nations to do away with economic freedom, because “laisser-faire and capitalist economic systems” have “created a great deal of ugliness” (p. 38). The time has come to work toward the emergence “of a single world culture” (p. 61). This must be done with the explicit help of the mass media and the educational systems.
Conclusion
With the foundation of the United Nations and its suborganizations, the drive to advance the programs of eugenics and transhumanism took a big step forward. Together with the activities of the Club of Rome, they have stage to initiate the great reset that is going on currently. With the pronouncement of a pandemic, the goal of comprehensive government control of the economy and society has taken another leap toward transforming the economy and society. Freedom faces a new enemy. The tyranny comes under the disguise of expert rule and benevolent dictatorship. The new rulers do not justify their right to dominance because of divine providence but now claim the right to rule the people in the name of universal health and safety based on presumed scientific evidence.


prepareforchange--2020-11-22--Balancing Energies Are Now At Work

Balancing Energies Are Now At Work

SkyView Astrology – analysing the time quality with the real star constellations Balancing energies are now at work !
The dark Moon conjunction in Libra indicates some balancing time quality and we can expect that some issues are being resolved several hidden aspects of what is happening in the world will come to the surface .
Mercury is the first upcoming planet in house one in this world chart , still in Virgo , indicates that a lot of things are being reveled .
Virgo is the sign of harvest , here we check the fruit and select the good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are being thrown away .
Now look at this quite literally… .
I am sure a lot will not be in the main stream , but the signs are very clear .
I just listened to the press conference of DJT and if you look for signs , they were quite clear of what is being said beyond the words that have been spoken .
You need to understand that he is the most brilliant Chess player that you can imagine .
There are many layers to what was said .
From the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to retrograde Neptune .
We can see here , that things can ’ t come into the open jet , too many are not ready .
Neptune in Aquarius is still laying a veil around the truth and it is a gift for many , because the wake up process will be very hard for those who are totally relying on the main stream .
The quincunx that goes from the sun/moon conjunction to the North Node shows the connection with the aspects back to Mercury and Venus .
Also in a chart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the corner ” and see in many layers .
The manifestation of the deceptions for millennia , has deeply embossed into the human psyche and is not just vanishing over night .
People are so used to be lied to that they themselves are not able to talk truth , even though they think it is true .
But truth is defined by consciousness level .
It changes when we move into a higher level of consciousness and there it is difficult to understand that we did believe the lies we can see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s own rules and understanding .
It is a fact that , just as a sample , someone is on level 5 he/she can ’ t see level 6 because level 5 is their truth and way of thinking .
On each level a person can see those below them , but once they have moved on to higher levels of consciousness , it ’ s very difficult to understand the fear of lower consciousness levels .
This is why “ Only a master can recognize a master ” .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consciousness level there is no competition .
This is why all the great masters have been prosecuted eventually .
The masses could not tolerate someone with such a high consciousness level .
Here you might be able to see why certain people on the planet are spoken so ill of and only bad news appear in mainstream media .
Their consciousness level is very linear and low .
This is very true for what happens in politics too and why most people don ’ t see what is happening .
Most of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they can see only the mundane truth .
We can compare it to chess : this is not a “ sport ” for the masses… and it played brilliantly only by a few .
There is a green/blue triangle from the moon/sun conjunction to the North node to to Venus and back to the sun and moon .
This one shows a lot of the gift that is being received by humanity now and will manifest ( Node/Taurus ) an outcome that will balance the forces on the earth .
But since the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is hidden and misunderstood because the truth can ’ t be said yet , people ( mass consciousness ) would not understand and freak out .
This is being avoided by a very subtle way of how things process that the linear thinking people can understand and cope .
The Jupiter/Pluto conjunction with Saturn in Sagittarius is connected to the dark moon and also to Mars and Venus .
Here I would like to add a picture again to explain the symbol of Pluto again , so it can be seen in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ communicate in this chart , are bringing break trough ’ s and for many it will bring the experience of the big “ aha… ” and some would be able to jump into a higher consciousness level .
A huge chance for human beings !
Especially now that both planets are direct again , we see a time quality that will bring massive and relatively fast changes .
The square to Venus into Virgo shows the resistance of people to really look with their heart .
They have build a huge wall around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exclusion , and this is not easy to tear down .
Part of the next step will be big confusion : who can I trust ?
?
?
This is very understandable , people will be like little children that just burned their fingers on the hot plate and never want to touch one again .
Mass meditations are helping a lot to lift the consciousness One thing that is happening in Germany is of great importance .
This is the country responsible for the break through to the light in Europe .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ switch with the law they want to anchor on Wednesday about the Infection Protection Law .
This will take the basic rights from people … now some organizations are calling for the German people to go to Berlin for a mass demonstration , not thousands , but millions of people .
What can we do ?
Hold the light… every one .
In Germany Miriam calls on people to go out every Monday night with a candle , walk around the main church or other main places and we can do the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candle every night , we can put it on the window seal or use it in a meditation .
This will help the energy of the world and at the same time yourselves to rise your consciousness into the Divine Light that is very strong here on Earth .
Hold the light but remember , in the 3D where things are material and manifest , if we shine strong light , the shadow will appear even darker .
Don ’ t get confused… .
You can check out the original reading and find @ @ @ @ @ @ @ **SkyView Astrology ( outer circle ) works with the real star-constellations .
Western/Tropical Astrology ( inner circle ) has nothing to do with the stars anymore and their 1˚ Aries is 28˚ apart from the true star constellations , the Vedic/Indian system is 6˚ degrees different .
SkyView Astrology does not tell you who you are , but shows the time quality and blueprint/road-map of one ’ s life .
It also is no fortune telling tool and can ’ t predict the future since you have the innate ability to co-create your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for this incarnation .
Once you know how , you can change your life and time line .
The Western Astrology has nothing to do with the star constellations , but is a method to show how the sun moves trough the season , which makes a certain sense in the northern hemisphere , but doesn ’ t make any sense near and below the equator in the southern hemisphere .
The sun represents out consciousness and not the “ persona ” For your convenience I list the degrees of the sign and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : The dates of the transition of the sun are based on the guidelines of IAU ( International Astronomical Union ) .
Katharina Bless is Author of “ SkyView Astrology – Applying the real Star Constellations to our Life ’ s Journey and Soul Evolution ” and “ Flower Healing Power ” book one and two and “ The Secret of the Abundance Box ” .
She lives in Chiang Rai , Thailand .
If you are interested to have a personal reading or life coaching , you find the contact info here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

From our friend Katharina:
SkyView Astrology – analysing the time quality with the real star constellations
Balancing energies are now at work!
by Katharina Bless
The dark Moon conjunction in Libra indicates some balancing time quality and we can expect that some issues are being resolved several hidden aspects of what is happening in the world will come to the surface. Mercury is the first upcoming planet in house one in this world chart, still in Virgo, indicates that a lot of things are being reveled. Virgo is the sign of harvest, here we check the fruit and select the good ones to keep and the rotten ones are being thrown away.
Now look at this quite literally…. I am sure a lot will not be in the main stream, but the signs are very clear. I just listened to the press conference of DJT and if you look for signs, they were quite clear of what is being said beyond the words that have been spoken. You need to understand that he is the most brilliant Chess player that you can imagine. There are many layers to what was said.
From the dark moon conjunction there is a trine to retrograde Neptune. We can see here, that things can’t come into the open jet, too many are not ready. Neptune in Aquarius is still laying a veil around the truth and it is a gift for many, because the wake up process will be very hard for those who are totally relying on the main stream.
The quincunx that goes from the sun/moon conjunction to the North Node shows the connection with the aspects back to Mercury and Venus. Also in a chart, we have to “look around the corner” and see in many layers.
The manifestation of the deceptions for millennia, has deeply embossed into the human psyche and is not just vanishing over night. People are so used to be lied to that they themselves are not able to talk truth, even though they think it is true. But truth is defined by consciousness level. It changes when we move into a higher level of consciousness and there it is difficult to understand that we did believe the lies we can see clearly now.
Each consciousness level has it’s own rules and understanding. It is a fact that, just as a sample, someone is on level 5 he/she can’t see level 6 because level 5 is their truth and way of thinking. On each level a person can see those below them, but once they have moved on to higher levels of consciousness, it’s very difficult to understand the fear of lower consciousness levels.
This is why “Only a master can recognize a master”. And only if you are on the same consciousness level there is no competition. This is why all the great masters have been prosecuted eventually. The masses could not tolerate someone with such a high consciousness level. Here you might be able to see why certain people on the planet are spoken so ill of and only bad news appear in mainstream media. Their consciousness level is very linear and low.
This is very true for what happens in politics too and why most people don’t see what is happening. Most of the masses’ consciousness level is linear and they can see only the mundane truth. We can compare it to chess: this is not a “sport” for the masses… and it played brilliantly only by a few.
There is a green/blue triangle from the moon/sun conjunction to the North node to to Venus and back to the sun and moon. This one shows a lot of the gift that is being received by humanity now and will manifest (Node/Taurus) an outcome that will balance the forces on the earth. But since the one-and-a-half square goes to Mercury, it is hidden and misunderstood because the truth can’t be said yet, people (mass consciousness) would not understand and freak out. This is being avoided by a very subtle way of how things process that the linear thinking people can understand and cope.
The Jupiter/Pluto conjunction with Saturn in Sagittarius is connected to the dark moon and also to Mars and Venus. Here I would like to add a picture again to explain the symbol of Pluto again, so it can be seen in a different light. The expansion that Jupiter communicate in this chart, are bringing break trough’s and for many it will bring the experience of the big “aha…” and some would be able to jump into a higher consciousness level. A huge chance for human beings! Especially now that both planets are direct again, we see a time quality that will bring massive and relatively fast changes.
The square to Venus into Virgo shows the resistance of people to really look with their heart. They have build a huge wall around them, a wall of fear and exclusion, and this is not easy to tear down. Part of the next step will be big confusion: who can I trust???
This is very understandable, people will be like little children that just burned their fingers on the hot plate and never want to touch one again. Mass meditations are helping a lot to lift the consciousness
One thing that is happening in Germany is of great importance. This is the country responsible for the break through to the light in Europe. Now they want to pull the kill switch with the law they want to anchor on Wednesday about the Infection Protection Law. This will take the basic rights from people … now some organizations are calling for the German people to go to Berlin for a mass demonstration, not thousands, but millions of people.
What can we do? Hold the light… every one. In Germany Miriam calls on people to go out every Monday night with a candle, walk around the main church or other main places and we can do the same. Hold the light and light a candle every night, we can put it on the window seal or use it in a meditation. This will help the energy of the world and at the same time yourselves to rise your consciousness into the Divine Light that is very strong here on Earth.
Hold the light but remember, in the 3D where things are material and manifest, if we shine strong light, the shadow will appear even darker. Don’t get confused….
Blessings to you all
Katharina
You can check out the original reading and find the images at: https://skyviewastrology.wordpress.com/2020/11/14/dark-moon-reading-15-nov2020/
**SkyView Astrology (outer circle) works with the real star-constellations. Western/Tropical Astrology (inner circle) has nothing to do with the stars anymore and their 1˚ Aries is 28˚ apart from the true star constellations, the Vedic/Indian system is 6˚ degrees different.
SkyView Astrology does not tell you who you are, but shows the time quality and blueprint/road-map of one’s life. It also is no fortune telling tool and can’t predict the future since you have the innate ability to co-create your life within the curriculum you have chosen for this incarnation. Once you know how, you can change your life and time line.
The Western Astrology has nothing to do with the star constellations, but is a method to show how the sun moves trough the season, which makes a certain sense in the northern hemisphere, but doesn’t make any sense near and below the equator in the southern hemisphere. The sun represents out consciousness and not the “persona”
For your convenience I list the degrees of the sign and dates when the sun enters the signs:
Aries: 25° / April 18; Taurus: 36° / May 13, Gemini: 28° / June 21; Cancer: 20° / July 20; Leo: 36° / Aug 10; Virgo: 44° / Sept 16; Libra: 23° / Oct 30; Scorpio: 25° / Nov 23; Sagittarius: 33° / Dec 17; Capricorn: 28° / Jan 20; Aquarius: 25° / Feb 16; Pisces: 37° / March 11
The dates of the transition of the sun are based on the guidelines of IAU (International Astronomical Union).
Katharina Bless is Author of “SkyView Astrology – Applying the real Star Constellations to our Life’s Journey and Soul Evolution” and “Flower Healing Power” book one and two and “The Secret of the Abundance Box”. She lives in Chiang Rai, Thailand. If you are interested to have a personal reading or life coaching, you find the contact info here: http://www.somaretreatcenter.com/contact-us.html
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-11-22--Sequel to The Fall Of The Cabal – Part 4

Part 4 : the Protocols of Zion.. By Janet Ossebaard & Cyntha Koeter Music by Alexander Nakarada , Chopin , @ @ @ @ @ to support their work : https : /www.fallcabal.com Get used to going to bit chute @ @ @ @ @ can watch it here : Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) @ @ @ @ @ not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions @ @ @ @ @ and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed @ @ @ @ @ , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those @ @ @ @ @ However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , @ @ @ @ @ own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is @ @ @ @ @ .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness @ @ @ @ @ to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

Part 4: the Protocols of Zion..
By Janet Ossebaard & Cyntha Koeter
Music by Alexander Nakarada, Chopin, Y2Mate
For more info / to support their work:
https:/www.fallcabal.com
Get used to going to bit chute for uncensored material, you can watch it here:
Fall Of The Cabal Part 4
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-11-23--Those responsible for the CV19 fake crisis to be sued for crimes against humanity and child abuse

WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE to sue Governments , corporations and individuals around the world for the CV19 fake crisis .
WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE is made up of thousands of doctors , scientists , professors , lawyers , journalists… around the world To watch the Video click the link below : “ There is no doubt that what we are seeing are crimes against humanity and child abuse – forcing children to wear masks at school.
” “ We are looking at the masks , we will be sending notices of liability to schools , principals , CEO of companies and doctors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you put those people on notice and something happens after that notice then they will be held personally responsible and liable .
This will give parents and empower people with knowledge to put pressure on the public sector.
” – Martin Byrne , Barrister at Law practicing in the Superior Courts , Dublin .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material realm .

WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE to sue Governments, corporations and individuals around the world for the CV19 fake crisis.
WORLD FREEDOM ALLIANCE is made up of thousands of doctors, scientists, professors, lawyers, journalists… around the world
To watch the Video click the link below:
http://www.awakeningchannel.com/post/those-responsible-for-the-cv19-fake-crisis-to-be-sued-for-crimes-against-humanity-and-child-abuse?fbclid=IwAR0OMUBpe1flr_Hg8ImCGlq1WIT-u5rGqLb36SkWQdnQFJGHg2GbW7hhLms
“There is no doubt that what we are seeing are crimes against humanity and child abuse – forcing children to wear masks at school.”
“We are looking at the masks, we will be sending notices of liability to schools, principals, CEO of companies and doctors. To put them on notice. If you put those people on notice and something happens after that notice then they will be held personally responsible and liable. This will give parents and empower people with knowledge to put pressure on the public sector.”
– Martin Byrne, Barrister at Law practicing in the Superior Courts, Dublin.
For more information:
https://worlddoctorsalliance.com/blog/theworldfreedomalliance2020announcementvideo/
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage