prepareforchange--2020-03-13--Pro-LGBTQP Curriculum Will Teach Third-Graders How To Have Anal Sex (Public Education Becomes Pedoph

Pro-LGBTQP Curriculum Will Teach Third-Graders How To Have Anal Sex (Public Education Becomes Pedophilia Indoctrination)

The Austin Independent School District ( AISD ) in Texas has voted to implement a new pro-LGBTQP curriculum that includes teaching third-graders how to have anal sex .
In a unanimous decision , the district ’ s board decided that the most “ inclusive ” path forward is to confuse children as young as eight into believing that male-female biology is “ oppressive.
” Further , these youth will now be told that they can pick any gender they ’ d like , and also put their reproductive organs wherever it feels good to them , including with the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Under the new curriculum , for the first time , the district will teach students about gender identity and sexual orientation , ” is how local media outlets are framing it .
“ The lessons will also help kids identify an adult they can trust ; plus talk to them about options if they get pregnant , and seventh graders would learn how to use a condom.
” LGBTQPs now claim that it ’ s “ bullying ” to not want young children to be taught how to have anal sex @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Values ” showed up to protest the meeting where these changes were discussed , and ultimately passed .
But they were repeatedly interrupted by supporters , including a transgender “ woman ” named “ Naomi Wilson ” who had to be arrested for disorderly conduct .
Other supporters of teaching anal sex to eight-year-olds include the group “ Informed Parents of Austin ” ( IPA ) which claims to advocate for “ policies in the Austin Independent School District that pertain to the LGBTQ community.
” IPA also says it “ counter [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which has a mission of removing anti-bullying and equality policies from AISD.
” In other words , not wanting to have your children exposed to “ curriculum ” that instructs them about how to put their private parts into other people ’ s rectums is a form of “ bullying ” and “ inequality ” that IPA seeks to stop .
“ I think it ’ s really important that our sex-ed curriculum talks ( sic ) about the biology of our body parts , what ’ s coming down the line when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and outline what a healthy relationship looks like , ” says Matt Shead , one of IPA ’ s executive team members .
“ I want to know the administration , teachers , parents all have the same language that we are using to talk about these things to minimize confusion , ” he added in a media statement .
Only a pedophile would be so obsessed with forcing sexual deviance on eight-year-olds in the name of “ progress ” • Normalization of Pedophilia Goes Mainstream , Child Molesters Rebranded as ‘ Minor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As “ Sexual Orientation ” in California Schools • The Illuminati Attempt to Normalize Sex Between Adults and Children Concerned Parents of Texas ( CPT ) , however , vehemently disagrees .
Carol Ayala , the group ’ s director , basically told the media what every other normal person out there is also thinking : that this whole pro-LGBTQP “ education ” agenda is just plain wrong .
“ ( The curriculum ) encourages minor children to engage in vaginal , oral , and anal sexual activity through the comprehensive sex-ed they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s quoted as saying .
CPT is a group launched in April 2017 that describes itself as a group of “ parents , grandparents , educators , and community members who are against the radical sex-ed and LGBT agenda being introduced to children as young as four through ‘ anti-bullying , ’ ‘ relationship education , ’ and school sex-ed ‘ curricula.
’ ” “ Parents have the right to give our children the right message about sex , ” the group also contends .
Many parents who don ’ t necessarily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also speaking out , including M.J. Alvarado who says that such material isn ’ t appropriate for children this young , adding that it pushes sexual behaviors on these kids that they can ’ t even comprehend as they ’ re just kids .
“ It introduces and normalizes advanced sexual behaviors to children at a very young age and perhaps places ideas in their mind that might not have been there before and can potentially lead to some early and unhealthy sexual behaviors , ” Alvarado is quoted as saying .
Disclaimer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

By Ethan Huff,
The Austin Independent School District (AISD) in Texas has voted to implement a new pro-LGBTQP curriculum that includes teaching third-graders how to have anal sex.
In a unanimous decision, the district’s board decided that the most “inclusive” path forward is to confuse children as young as eight into believing that male-female biology is “oppressive.”
Further, these youth will now be told that they can pick any gender they’d like, and also put their reproductive organs wherever it feels good to them, including with the use of sex toys if it feels right.
“Under the new curriculum, for the first time, the district will teach students about gender identity and sexual orientation,” is how local media outlets are framing it.
“The lessons will also help kids identify an adult they can trust; plus talk to them about options if they get pregnant, and seventh graders would learn how to use a condom.”
LGBTQPs now claim that it’s “bullying” to not want young children to be taught how to have anal sex
Demonstrators from the pro-family group “Texas Values” showed up to protest the meeting where these changes were discussed, and ultimately passed. But they were repeatedly interrupted by supporters, including a transgender “woman” named “Naomi Wilson” who had to be arrested for disorderly conduct.
Other supporters of teaching anal sex to eight-year-olds include the group “Informed Parents of Austin” (IPA) which claims to advocate for “policies in the Austin Independent School District that pertain to the LGBTQ community.”
IPA also says it “counter[s] the efforts of any group which has a mission of removing anti-bullying and equality policies from AISD.”
In other words, not wanting to have your children exposed to “curriculum” that instructs them about how to put their private parts into other people’s rectums is a form of “bullying” and “inequality” that IPA seeks to stop.
“I think it’s really important that our sex-ed curriculum talks (sic) about the biology of our body parts, what’s coming down the line when we hit puberty, healthy communication, and outline what a healthy relationship looks like,” says Matt Shead, one of IPA’s executive team members.
“I want to know the administration, teachers, parents all have the same language that we are using to talk about these things to minimize confusion,” he added in a media statement.
Only a pedophile would be so obsessed with forcing sexual deviance on eight-year-olds in the name of “progress”
Concerned Parents of Texas (CPT), however, vehemently disagrees. Carol Ayala, the group’s director, basically told the media what every other normal person out there is also thinking: that this whole pro-LGBTQP “education” agenda is just plain wrong.
“(The curriculum) encourages minor children to engage in vaginal, oral, and anal sexual activity through the comprehensive sex-ed they’re voting on,” she’s quoted as saying.
CPT is a group launched in April 2017 that describes itself as a group of “parents, grandparents, educators, and community members who are against the radical sex-ed and LGBT agenda being introduced to children as young as four through ‘anti-bullying,’ ‘relationship education,’ and school sex-ed ‘curricula.’”
“Parents have the right to give our children the right message about sex,” the group also contends.
Many parents who don’t necessarily identify with either of these groups are also speaking out, including M.J. Alvarado who says that such material isn’t appropriate for children this young, adding that it pushes sexual behaviors on these kids that they can’t even comprehend as they’re just kids.
“It introduces and normalizes advanced sexual behaviors to children at a very young age and perhaps places ideas in their mind that might not have been there before and can potentially lead to some early and unhealthy sexual behaviors,” Alvarado is quoted as saying.
Source: https://humansarefree.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-03-13--Did Colonists Give Infected Blankets to Native Americans as Biological Warfare?

There ’ s evidence that British colonists in 18th-century America gave Native Americans smallpox-infected blankets at least once—but did it work ?
North American colonists ’ warfare against Native Americans often was horrifyingly brutal .
But one method they appear to have used—perhaps just once—shocks even more than all the bloody slaughter : The gifting of blankets and linens contaminated with smallpox .
The virus causes a disease that can inflict disfiguring scars , blindness and death .
The tactic constitutes a crude form of biological warfare—but accounts of the colonists using it are actually scant .
Colonial weaponizing of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by 19th-century historian Francis Parkman , who came across correspondence in which Sir Jeffery Amherst , commander in chief of the British forces in North America in the early 1760s , had discussed its use with Col. Henry Bouquet , a subordinate on the western frontier during the French and Indian War .
For all the outrage the account has stirred over the years , there ’ s only one clearly documented instance of a colonial attempt to spread smallpox during the war , and oddly , Amherst probably didn ’ t have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s also no clear historical verdict on whether the biological attack even worked .
Early American historian Elizabeth Fenn of the University of Colorado Boulder lays out her theory on what happened in her 2000 article in the Journal of American History .
In the late spring of 1763 , Delaware , Shawnee and Mingo warriors , inspired by Ottawa war leader Pontiac , laid siege to Fort Pitt , an outpost at the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers in present-day downtown Pittsburgh .
The fort ’ s commander , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a June 16 message to his superior , Philadelphia-based Col. Henry Bouquet , that the situation was dire , with local traders and colonists taking refuge inside the fort ’ s walls .
Ecuyer wasn ’ t just afraid of his Native American adversaries .
The fort ’ s hospital had patients with smallpox , and Ecuyer feared the disease might overwhelm the population inside the fort ’ s cramped confines .
Bouquet , in turn , passed along the news about the smallpox inside Fort Pitt to his own superior , Amherst @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In Amherst ’ s July 7 response , he cold-bloodedly saw an opportunity in the disease outbreak .
“ Could it not be contrived to Send the Small Pox among those Disaffected Tribes of Indians ?
We must , on this occasion , Use Every Stratagem in our power to Reduce them.
” On July 13 , Bouquet , who at that point was traveling across Pennsylvania with British reinforcements for Fort Pitt , responded to Amherst , promising that he would try to spread the disease to the Native Americans via contaminated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to get the disease myself.
” That tactic seemed to please Amherst , who wrote back in approval on July 16 , urging him to spread smallpox “ as well as try Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execreble [ sic ] Race.
” What Amherst and Bouquet didn ’ t know was that somebody at Fort Pitt had already thought of trying to infect the Native Americans with smallpox—and had attempted to do it .
William Trent , a trader , land speculator and militia captain , wrote in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two Delaware emissaries had visited the fort , and asked to hold talks the next day .
At that meeting , after the Native American diplomats had tried unsuccessfully to persuade the British to abandon Fort Pitt , they asked for provisions and liquor for their return .
The British complied , and also gave them gifts—two blankets and a handkerchief which had come from the smallpox ward .
“ I hope it will have the desired effect , ” Trent wrote .
Though it ’ s not completely clear who perpetrated the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Trent as the probable culprit .
As detailed in Fenn ’ s 2000 article , the trader later submitted an invoice to the British military for purchasing two blankets and a silk handkerchief “ to Replace in kind those which were taken from people in the Hospital to Convey the Smallpox to the Indians.
” Ecuyer certified that the items were used to spread smallpox , which indicates that he may have been in on the attempt as well .
British Gen. Thomas Gage , who succeeded Amherst that year as colonial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ That ’ s the one documented case that we have , ” says Paul Kelton , a historian at Stony Brook University , and author of two books on the role of epidemics in the European takeover of the Americas .
It ’ s not known whether Bouquet actually followed up on Amherst ’ s letter and made additional attempts on his own to spread smallpox to the Native Americans , he says .
It ’ s also not clear whether or not the attempt at biological warfare had the intended effect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Native Americans around Fort Pitt were “ struck hard ” by smallpox in the spring and summer of 1763 .
“ We can ’ t be sure , ” Kelton says .
Around that time , “ we know that smallpox was circulating in the area , but they [ Native Americans ] could have come down with the disease by other means.
” Historian Philip Ranlet of Hunter College and author of a 2000 article on the smallpox blanket incident in Pennsylvania History : A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no evidence that the scheme worked , ” Ranlet says .
“ The infection on the blankets was apparently old , so no one could catch smallpox from the blankets .
Besides , the Indians just had smallpox—the smallpox that reached Fort Pitt had come from Indians—and anyone susceptible to smallpox had already had it.
” The most important indication that the scheme was a bust , Ranlet says , “ is that Trent would have bragged in his journal if the scheme had worked .
He is silent as to what happened.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ work , British officers ’ willingness to contemplate using smallpox against the Indians was a sign of their callousness .
“ Even for that time period , it violated civilized notions of war , ” says Kelton , who notes that disease “ kills indiscriminately—it would kill women and children , not just warriors.
” But Kelton cautions against focusing too much on the smallpox blanket incident as a documented method of attack against Native Americans .
He says the tactic , however callous and brutal , is only a small part of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1600s and 1700s .
During this period British forces tried to drive out Native Americans by cutting down their corn and burning their homes , turning them into refugees .
In Kelton ’ s view , that rendered them far more vulnerable to the ravages of disease than a pile of infected blankets .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ realm .

There’s evidence that British colonists in 18th-century America gave Native Americans smallpox-infected blankets at least once—but did it work?
By Patrick J. Kiger,
North American colonists’ warfare against Native Americans often was horrifyingly brutal. But one method they appear to have used—perhaps just once—shocks even more than all the bloody slaughter: The gifting of blankets and linens contaminated with smallpox. The virus causes a disease that can inflict disfiguring scars, blindness and death. The tactic constitutes a crude form of biological warfare—but accounts of the colonists using it are actually scant.
Colonial weaponizing of smallpox against Native Americans was first reported by 19th-century historian Francis Parkman, who came across correspondence in which Sir Jeffery Amherst, commander in chief of the British forces in North America in the early 1760s, had discussed its use with Col. Henry Bouquet, a subordinate on the western frontier during the French and Indian War.
For all the outrage the account has stirred over the years, there’s only one clearly documented instance of a colonial attempt to spread smallpox during the war, and oddly, Amherst probably didn’t have anything to do with it. There’s also no clear historical verdict on whether the biological attack even worked.
Smallpox had spread at Fort Pitt.
Early American historian Elizabeth Fenn of the University of Colorado Boulder lays out her theory on what happened in her 2000 article in the Journal of American History. In the late spring of 1763, Delaware, Shawnee and Mingo warriors, inspired by Ottawa war leader Pontiac, laid siege to Fort Pitt, an outpost at the confluence of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers in present-day downtown Pittsburgh.
Sir Jeffrey Amherst wrote a letter regarding the use of smallpox blankets as a weapon against Native Americans. Ann Ronan Pictures/Print Collector/Getty Images
The fort’s commander, Capt. Simeon Ecuyer, reported in a June 16 message to his superior, Philadelphia-based Col. Henry Bouquet, that the situation was dire, with local traders and colonists taking refuge inside the fort’s walls. Ecuyer wasn’t just afraid of his Native American adversaries. The fort’s hospital had patients with smallpox, and Ecuyer feared the disease might overwhelm the population inside the fort’s cramped confines.
Bouquet, in turn, passed along the news about the smallpox inside Fort Pitt to his own superior, Amherst, in a June 23 letter. In Amherst’s July 7 response, he cold-bloodedly saw an opportunity in the disease outbreak. “Could it not be contrived to Send the Small Pox among those Disaffected Tribes of Indians? We must, on this occasion, Use Every Stratagem in our power to Reduce them.”
“We must, on this occasion, Use Every Stratagem in our power to Reduce them.”
On July 13, Bouquet, who at that point was traveling across Pennsylvania with British reinforcements for Fort Pitt, responded to Amherst, promising that he would try to spread the disease to the Native Americans via contaminated blankets, “taking care however not to get the disease myself.” That tactic seemed to please Amherst, who wrote back in approval on July 16, urging him to spread smallpox “as well as try Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execreble [sic] Race.”
What Amherst and Bouquet didn’t know was that somebody at Fort Pitt had already thought of trying to infect the Native Americans with smallpox—and had attempted to do it.
William Trent, a trader, land speculator and militia captain, wrote in his diary that on June 23, two Delaware emissaries had visited the fort, and asked to hold talks the next day. At that meeting, after the Native American diplomats had tried unsuccessfully to persuade the British to abandon Fort Pitt, they asked for provisions and liquor for their return. The British complied, and also gave them gifts—two blankets and a handkerchief which had come from the smallpox ward. “I hope it will have the desired effect,” Trent wrote.
Though it’s not completely clear who perpetrated the biological warfare attack, documentary evidence points to Trent as the probable culprit. As detailed in Fenn’s 2000 article, the trader later submitted an invoice to the British military for purchasing two blankets and a silk handkerchief “to Replace in kind those which were taken from people in the Hospital to Convey the Smallpox to the Indians.” Ecuyer certified that the items were used to spread smallpox, which indicates that he may have been in on the attempt as well. British Gen. Thomas Gage, who succeeded Amherst that year as colonial commander, eventually approved the payment.
“That’s the one documented case that we have,” says Paul Kelton, a historian at Stony Brook University, and author of two books on the role of epidemics in the European takeover of the Americas. It’s not known whether Bouquet actually followed up on Amherst’s letter and made additional attempts on his own to spread smallpox to the Native Americans, he says.
An illustration of Ottawa Chief, Pontiac confronting Colonel Henry Bouquet who authorized his officers to spread smallpox amongst native Americans by deliberately infecting blankets after peace talks. MPI/Getty Images
It’s not clear smallpox-infected blankets even worked.
It’s also not clear whether or not the attempt at biological warfare had the intended effect. According to Fenn’s article, the Native Americans around Fort Pitt were “struck hard” by smallpox in the spring and summer of 1763. “We can’t be sure,” Kelton says. Around that time, “we know that smallpox was circulating in the area, but they [Native Americans] could have come down with the disease by other means.”
Historian Philip Ranlet of Hunter College and author of a 2000 article on the smallpox blanket incident in Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, also casts doubt. “There is no evidence that the scheme worked,” Ranlet says. “The infection on the blankets was apparently old, so no one could catch smallpox from the blankets. Besides, the Indians just had smallpox—the smallpox that reached Fort Pitt had come from Indians—and anyone susceptible to smallpox had already had it.”
The most important indication that the scheme was a bust, Ranlet says, “is that Trent would have bragged in his journal if the scheme had worked. He is silent as to what happened.”
Even if it didn’t work, British officers’ willingness to contemplate using smallpox against the Indians was a sign of their callousness. “Even for that time period, it violated civilized notions of war,” says Kelton, who notes that disease “kills indiscriminately—it would kill women and children, not just warriors.”
But Kelton cautions against focusing too much on the smallpox blanket incident as a documented method of attack against Native Americans. He says the tactic, however callous and brutal, is only a small part of a larger story of brutality in the 1600s and 1700s. During this period British forces tried to drive out Native Americans by cutting down their corn and burning their homes, turning them into refugees. In Kelton’s view, that rendered them far more vulnerable to the ravages of disease than a pile of infected blankets.
Source: https://www.history.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-03-13--As Everything Bubble Implodes, Frazzled Fed Rolls Out Fastest Mega-Money Printer Ever, up to $4.5 Tr

As Everything Bubble Implodes, Frazzled Fed Rolls Out Fastest Mega-Money Printer Ever, up to $4.5 Trillion in Four Weeks

The Fed is going nuts trying to contain this .
Thursday early afternoon , during the chaos when the S & P 500 was down nearly 9 % , what would turn into the worst single-day stock market sell-off since the 1987 crash , the Fed rolled out its fastest mega money-printer yet , after its smaller money-printers malfunctioned .
It ’ s not going to be a long-drawn-out QE – though there is a component that is just that – but it ’ s going to be trillions of dollars , essentially all at once , front-loaded , starting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is the Fed ’ s latest effort to bail out Wall Street , the cherished asset holders that are so essential to the Fed ’ s “ wealth effect , ” all repo market participants , the banks , and the Treasury market that suddenly has gone haywire .
Lots of things have gone haywire as the Everything Bubble unwinds messily .
Last week , the 10-year Treasury yield had plunged toward zero during the stock market sell-off , which was crazy but in line with the logic that investors were all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Monday morning it fell to an unthinkable all-time low of 0.38 % .
But then , the 10-year yield more than doubled from 0.38 % at the low on Monday to 0.88 % at the highpoint on Thursday .
That the 10-year yield spikes during a stock market crash is somewhat of a scary thought .
It means that both stocks and long-dated Treasury securities are selling off at the same time .
And that probably made the Fed very nervous .
For stocks , Thursday was the 16th trading day since the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in those 15 trading days , the index has crashed nearly 27 % .
Late last week , demand for repos had increased .
And earlier this week , as markets came further unglued , the Fed shoveled more cash into the repo market .
• Monday morning , the Fed raised the maximum of the overnight repo from $ 100 billion to $ 150 billion .
• Tuesday morning , it raised the maximum for the twice-weekly 14-day term repo from $ 20 billion to $ 45 billion .
• Wednesday , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its handiwork , which was a continued crash These increases are reflected on the Fed ’ s weekly balance sheet released today .
Repos soared from $ 143 billion two weeks ago to $ 242 billion , nearly back where they ’ d been on January 1 ( $ 256 billion ) .
Note how the repo balances had been declining from the beginning of the year , dropping by 44 % , until the stock market began to crash and the Fed opened the vault : And it didn ’ t work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threw more cash at the market : • It again raised the maximum of the overnight repo , this time from $ 150 billion to $ 175 billion .
• It added a $ 50 billion 25-day repo to the mix .
And stocks just continued to crash .
So the Fed rolled out its fastest mega-money-printer ever .
Thursday early afternoon , the Fed announced in a surprise shock-and-awe move that it will use the repo market in a big way to try to prop up and inflate whatever needs propping up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ series of $ 500-billion term repos at least through April 13 , amounting to $ 4.0 trillion in new money over the four-week period .
On Thursday at 1:30 p.m. , it offered $ 500 billion in three-month repos , to settle on Friday .
But it fizzled : Of this offered amount , only $ 78.4 billion were accepted , perhaps because market participants weren ’ t able to come up with that much collateral that quickly or because they didn ’ t want that much cash .
This surprise of $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 500 index to spike 6 % in 15 minutes .
But when it emerged that only $ 78.4 billion had been taken , it succumbed again .
On Friday , the Fed will offer $ 1 trillion in repos : $ 500 billion in three-month repos and $ 500 billion in one-month repos .
That ’ s a heck of a lot of bucks to print in just one day .
But no problem for the new mega-money printer .
It anyone wants this much , it can print it .
Next week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Fed will offer another $ 1 trillion : next Monday , $ 500 billion in one-month repos ; and next Friday , $ 500 billion in three-month repos .
This will continue in each week , the same procedure of $ 1 trillion a week plus all the other repos , through Monday , April 13 .
If all these $ 500-billion repos starting Friday are accepted during the period , minus this Friday ’ s one-month $ 500-billion repo that will unwind on April 13 , they would amount to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come on top of the other repos and on top of the $ 60 billion a month in purchases of Treasury securities , that the Fed said it will broaden to include Treasury securities of all types and maturities , not just T-Bills .
In total , this would amount to nearly $ 4.5 trillion through April 13 that the Fed is offering to create to bail out Wall Street , repo market participants , the asset holders , the banks , and Corporate America .
It would more than double the already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trillion ) .
It could push the balance sheet to nearly $ 9 trillion by April 13 .
This is apparently the price of trying to maintain the insane Everything Bubble that the Fed has created since 2009 .
But maybe not .
It may well be that there is neither enough collateral nor enough demand for cash to come anywhere near those amounts .
Repos works differently than QE .
Under these repurchase agreements , the Fed offers to buy securities , and if there is not enough demand for cash , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much cash , then the repo auction will be undersubscribed .
This was the case on Thursday , when the first $ 500-billion repo was way undersubscribed , with only $ 78.4 billion being accepted .
The rest of the cash the Fed offered found no takers .
So that total amount of cash that will actually get poured into the system may only be a small fraction of the theoretical $ 4.5 trillion offered over the next four weeks .
It may turn out to be just guarantee by the Fed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough demand for it , and enough collateral to cover it .
But when you think about it , it ’ s really nuts what the Fed has done since 2009 to create the Everything Bubble .
And what it is trying to do now to contain the implosion of the Everything Bubble is even nuttier .
Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
Please use discernment !
Use logical thinking , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in this material realm .

The Fed is going nuts trying to contain this.
By Wolf Richter,
Thursday early afternoon, during the chaos when the S&P 500 was down nearly 9%, what would turn into the worst single-day stock market sell-off since the 1987 crash, the Fed rolled out its fastest mega money-printer yet, after its smaller money-printers malfunctioned. It’s not going to be a long-drawn-out QE – though there is a component that is just that – but it’s going to be trillions of dollars, essentially all at once, front-loaded, starting today, though today fizzled already.
This is the Fed’s latest effort to bail out Wall Street, the cherished asset holders that are so essential to the Fed’s “wealth effect,” all repo market participants, the banks, and the Treasury market that suddenly has gone haywire. Lots of things have gone haywire as the Everything Bubble unwinds messily.
Last week, the 10-year Treasury yield had plunged toward zero during the stock market sell-off, which was crazy but in line with the logic that investors were all piling into safe assets, and early Monday morning it fell to an unthinkable all-time low of 0.38%.
But then, the 10-year yield more than doubled from 0.38% at the low on Monday to 0.88% at the highpoint on Thursday. That the 10-year yield spikes during a stock market crash is somewhat of a scary thought. It means that both stocks and long-dated Treasury securities are selling off at the same time. And that probably made the Fed very nervous.
For stocks, Thursday was the 16th trading day since the S&P 500 peak, and in those 15 trading days, the index has crashed nearly 27%.
The smaller money-printers fizzle.
Late last week, demand for repos had increased. And earlier this week, as markets came further unglued, the Fed shoveled more cash into the repo market.
Monday morning, the Fed raised the maximum of the overnight repo from $100 billion to $150 billion.
Tuesday morning, it raised the maximum for the twice-weekly 14-day term repo from $20 billion to $45 billion.
Wednesday, it sat on its hands and watched its handiwork, which was a continued crash
These increases are reflected on the Fed’s weekly balance sheet released today. Repos soared from $143 billion two weeks ago to $242 billion, nearly back where they’d been on January 1 ($256 billion). Note how the repo balances had been declining from the beginning of the year, dropping by 44%, until the stock market began to crash and the Fed opened the vault:
And it didn’t work. So Thursday morning, the Fed threw more cash at the market:
It again raised the maximum of the overnight repo, this time from $150 billion to $175 billion.
It added a $50 billion 25-day repo to the mix.
And stocks just continued to crash.
So the Fed rolled out its fastest mega-money-printer ever.
Thursday early afternoon, the Fed announced in a surprise shock-and-awe move that it will use the repo market in a big way to try to prop up and inflate whatever needs propping up and inflating. It will offer a series of $500-billion term repos at least through April 13, amounting to $4.0 trillion in new money over the four-week period.
On Thursday at 1:30 p.m., it offered $500 billion in three-month repos, to settle on Friday. But it fizzled: Of this offered amount, only $78.4 billion were accepted, perhaps because market participants weren’t able to come up with that much collateral that quickly or because they didn’t want that much cash.
This surprise announcement of $500-billion offer caused the S&P 500 index to spike 6% in 15 minutes. But when it emerged that only $78.4 billion had been taken, it succumbed again.
On Friday, the Fed will offer $1 trillion in repos: $500 billion in three-month repos and $500 billion in one-month repos. That’s a heck of a lot of bucks to print in just one day. But no problem for the new mega-money printer. It anyone wants this much, it can print it.
Next week (the week of March 16), the Fed will offer another $1 trillion: next Monday, $500 billion in one-month repos; and next Friday, $500 billion in three-month repos.
This will continue in each week, the same procedure of $1 trillion a week plus all the other repos, through Monday, April 13.
If all these $500-billion repos starting Friday are accepted during the period, minus this Friday’s one-month $500-billion repo that will unwind on April 13, they would amount to $4.0 trillion.
These repos would come on top of the other repos and on top of the $60 billion a month in purchases of Treasury securities, that the Fed said it will broaden to include Treasury securities of all types and maturities, not just T-Bills.
In total, this would amount to nearly $4.5 trillion through April 13 that the Fed is offering to create to bail out Wall Street, repo market participants, the asset holders, the banks, and Corporate America. It would more than double the already re-ballooned balance sheet (currently $4.3 trillion). It could push the balance sheet to nearly $9 trillion by April 13.
This is apparently the price of trying to maintain the insane Everything Bubble that the Fed has created since 2009.
But maybe not.
It may well be that there is neither enough collateral nor enough demand for cash to come anywhere near those amounts. Repos works differently than QE. Under these repurchase agreements, the Fed offers to buy securities, and if there is not enough demand for cash, or not enough collateral to cover this much cash, then the repo auction will be undersubscribed.
This was the case on Thursday, when the first $500-billion repo was way undersubscribed, with only $78.4 billion being accepted. The rest of the cash the Fed offered found no takers.
So that total amount of cash that will actually get poured into the system may only be a small fraction of the theoretical $4.5 trillion offered over the next four weeks. It may turn out to be just guarantee by the Fed that there will be enough if there is enough demand for it, and enough collateral to cover it.
But when you think about it, it’s really nuts what the Fed has done since 2009 to create the Everything Bubble. And what it is trying to do now to contain the implosion of the Everything Bubble is even nuttier.
Source: WOLF STREET
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage


prepareforchange--2020-03-14--The Plan To Save The World & The Fall Of The Cabal!

In times of uncertainty & fear nothing soothes the mind more that knowing that what is going on now is not a “ Virus fault ” but “ The Plan To Save The World ” To further understand “ The Plan ” , the ‘ Fall of the Cabal ” series speaks about false-flags with an objective perspective of time and alternative revelations , goes into human trafficking , pedophilia , media manipulation , ritual sacrifices , and finishes by offering a positive perspective of what ’ s being done as many awakened would attest to .
One of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the series is the footage of a naked child who fashioned an escape rope to attempt an escape from a second story Windsor palace window .
The child heartbreakingly doesn ’ t make the escape and is shown falling .
Her effort contains thousands of hours of research and Ossebaard herself asks that annons do their own research and double-check everything she presents .
As those who follow Prepare for Change know , the whole presentation aligns with the years of information this site has presented .
Please take the time – about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ important series below and consider sharing with your loved ones : Disclaimer : We at Prepare for Change ( PFC ) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news , and therefore may seem controversial .
The opinions , views , statements , and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted , endorsed , espoused , or agreed to by Prepare for Change , its leadership Council , members , those who work with PFC , or those who read its content .
However , they are hopefully provocative .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , your own intuition and your own connection with Source , Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not .
By sharing information and seeding dialogue , it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm .

PLEASE DO NOT PANIC –
P atriots
A re
N ow
I n
C ontrol in the UK and DC
This is The Plan To Save The World & The Fall Of The Cabal! Whoever wins takes ALL
The lab-created Coronavirus was a cover-up for the mass mandatory vaccination agenda. Now it has become the biggest covert U.S. Intelligence operation that the world has ever seen.
-Be ready for Martial Law
-Be ready for schools to shut down
-Be ready for travel to be restricted
-Be ready for the internet to go down
-Be ready with supplies to get you through until it’s over
-Be ready to tell everyone panicking when it happens that it is all planned
In times of uncertainty & fear nothing soothes the mind more that knowing that what is going on now is not a “Virus fault” but “The Plan To Save The World”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM56-Cz8Mp8
“Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing”
To further understand “The Plan”, the ‘Fall of the Cabal” series speaks about false-flags with an objective perspective of time and alternative revelations, goes into human trafficking, pedophilia, media manipulation, ritual sacrifices, and finishes by offering a positive perspective of what’s being done as many awakened would attest to.
One of the most under circulated events she shows in the series is the footage of a naked child who fashioned an escape rope to attempt an escape from a second story Windsor palace window. The child heartbreakingly doesn’t make the escape and is shown falling.
Her effort contains thousands of hours of research and Ossebaard herself asks that annons do their own research and double-check everything she presents. As those who follow Prepare for Change know, the whole presentation aligns with the years of information this site has presented.
Please take the time – about three hours total – to view this important series below and consider sharing with your loved ones:
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage