theintercept--2020-02-12--A Canadian Energy Company Bought an Oregon Sheriff’s Unit

A in the small coastal town of North Bend , Oregon , dozens of law enforcement officers and corporate security personnel gathered for a two-day training on how to wage propaganda battles against protesters .
The November 2018 event was organized by the National Sheriffs ’ Association , one of the country ’ s largest law enforcement organizations , and hosted by the Coos County Sheriff ’ s Office , which has spent years monitoring opposition to the Jordan Cove Energy Project — a proposed liquid natural gas pipeline and export terminal that the Trump administration has named one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the event , however — totaling $ 26,250 — was paid by Pembina Pipeline Corp. , the Canadian fossil fuel company that owns the Jordan Cove project .
In fact , for nearly four years , Pembina was the sole funding source of a unit in the sheriff ’ s office dedicated to handling security concerns related to Jordan Cove — despite the fact that there is not yet any physical infrastructure in place to keep secure .
The pipeline and terminal can not begin construction without approval from the Federal Energy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote on whether to license the project in February .
Yet between 2016 and 2020 , the department ’ s liquid natural gas division , known as a “ combined services unit , ” spent at least $ 2 million of Pembina ’ s money .
The energy company put the funding on hold in April 2019 but left open the possibility that the arrangement could be revived in the future .
Pembina and the sheriff ’ s department are currently discussing how they may continue to work together , and Coos County @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partnership to be renewed .
In addition to hosting the law enforcement training , the unit used Pembina ’ s funds to purchase riot control equipment , monitor the activities of Jordan Cove opponents , and coordinate intelligence-gathering operations with private security companies that also worked for Pembina .
Local residents , environmental activists , and tribal members have staged rallies and sit-ins and participated in public hearings in opposition to the project , which they say would exacerbate the global climate crisis , damage vital waterways , and violate Indigenous sovereignty .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ land seized via eminent domain .
Law enforcement agencies often receive funding for equipment via corporate-backed professional associations and private foundations — a practice that civil liberties groups have criticized as enabling private influence with little oversight .
The arrangement between Pembina and the Coos County Sheriff ’ s Office was unusual , however , given the department ’ s scrutiny of activists engaged in First Amendment-protected speech in opposition to its corporate benefactor .
“ It ’ s stunning .
It ’ s the complete opposite of how the police have presented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are neutral parties positioned above the political fray , ” said Jeff Monaghan , a criminology professor at Canada ’ s Carleton University who studies police surveillance .
“ This is a public police force that has essentially opened up a private , corporately funded wing and , in doing so , is entrenching itself on one side of a very complicated political debate.
” The Coos County partnership is an extreme example of a trend in policing that has gained momentum across the United States — particularly since thousands of protesters from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota in 2016 and 2017 in an effort to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline .
Corporations are developing creative means to funnel millions of dollars to local law enforcement groups , and this funding has often been paired with increasingly elaborate private security and propaganda operations .
An investigation by The Intercept and Type Investigations , based on more than 15,000 pages of documents obtained via open records requests from the Coos County Sheriff ’ s Office and the city of Portland , sheds light on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working to monitor and stymie opposition to the Jordan Cove Energy Project .
The documents also reveal new details about a network of private actors profiting off the suppression of protest movements nationwide , among them veterans of the Dakota Access pipeline campaign who have since contributed to the policing efforts around Jordan Cove .
The global consulting firm Teneo led Jordan Cove-related communications and intelligence operations on behalf of Pembina , producing regular reports on the activities of opponents and helping coordinate the efforts of federal , state , and local law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Homeland Security , and county sheriff ’ s offices , the records show .
At the November 2018 training paid for by Pembina , one workshop was led by employees of Delve , a Washington , D.C.-based opposition research firm affiliated with the national Republican Party that worked alongside police during the Dakota Access pipeline protests .
Another was led by former consultants for TigerSwan , the defense firm hired to oversee security of the Dakota Access pipeline that came under fire for its militaristic approach to protesters .
The two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enforcement had previously attempted to organize pro-pipeline counterprotests , according to leaked audio recordings , encouraging dangerous tactics and at one point dangling the prospect of anonymous donations from oil companies .
“ Pembina and other corporations are trying to build out the infrastructure now to lock us , as a planet , into using big reserves of fossil fuel , ” said Brendan McQuade , assistant professor of criminology at the University of Southern Maine and author of a recently released book on police fusion centers .
“ The most distressing element @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the police both locally and nationally lining up , in a rigid way , behind corporations carrying out fossil fuel extraction.
” First proposed in 2005 , the Jordan Cove Energy Project has become one of the longest-running battles in the country between the fossil fuel industry and opponents of new hydrocarbon energy infrastructure .
If built , the project would transport 438 billion cubic feet of natural gas per year from the Jonah Field in Wyoming , the Piceance Basin in Colorado , and the Uinta Basin in northern Utah .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beneath five major rivers as it pumps natural gas to a new export terminal at Coos Bay , where the gas would be chilled and liquefied before being carried to Asian markets on massive tankers .
In 2016 , landowners in the pipeline ’ s proposed path successfully lobbied the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission , which provides permits for the construction of natural gas infrastructure , to deny an application to build the project .
The agency asserted that developers had not proven the need for it .
Pembina reapplied a year later @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s election .
Since then , Trump has appointed individuals to the five-member commission who are more in favor of fossil fuel projects than their predecessors , including Neil Chatterjee , who previously served as energy policy adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell .
A decision by the FERC is expected on February 13 .
In the meantime , grassroots environmental groups have helped rally tens of thousands of people to submit comments opposing Jordan Cove to state and federal permitting agencies .
The Karuk , Yurok , Klamath , Tolowa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Valley tribes have all passed resolutions opposing the project .
On a misty morning in August , Larry Maghan , a retired Bureau of Land Management biologist , stood on the shores of Coos Bay overlooking the proposed site of the Jordan Cove export terminal .
The land on which he and his wife , Sylvia , have lived for more than 30 years is in one of the proposed paths of the Pacific Connector pipeline , and a portion of it is threatened with eminent domain .
“ This project would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but for our entire area , ” Maghan said .
“ It ’ s almost unthinkable that our local police force would be so invested in it.
” The LNG division of the Coos County Sheriff ’ s Office was established in December 2015 .
At the time , the Jordan Cove project was owned by the energy infrastructure company Veresen , which Pembina acquired in 2017 .
Coos County Sheriff Zanni said the department expected Jordan Cove to create an array of security needs .
Coos Bay is popular with anglers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ share the space with giant LNG carriers , and he believed the terminal could become a target for terrorism .
According to county expenditure records , the Pembina-funded sheriff ’ s unit spent at least $ 1.2 million on salaries , benefits , and overtime between 2016 and 2020 .
The sheriff ’ s office also used money from Pembina to acquire equipment and technology that would allow deputies to monitor environmental activists and respond forcefully to potential protests .
Last year , the department spent $ 48,250 of Pembina funds on an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected tactical vehicle — a type of armored vehicle first developed for the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan that police have also used in the streets of Ferguson and at Standing Rock .
The department also purchased social media archiving software and a drone .
The sound cannon was a response to what happened at Standing Rock , according to Zanni , who said he wanted a “ more humane way ” to deal with protesters that would avoid physical confrontation .
As for the MRAP , the armored vehicle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government ’ s surplus military property program was in a state of disrepair .
Zanni said the vehicle had “ technically nothing ” to do with Jordan Cove .
“ It ’ s called leveraging for the better of the community , ” he added .
Zanni described the sheriff ’ s office as “ severely underfunded.
” The department used to rely on proceeds from timber harvests on federal land to pay its bills , but that funding dropped dramatically in recent decades .
When Pembina discontinued funding in April , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money for the unit to finish out the year .
In December , the department was forced to absorb four deputies whose salaries had been paid for by the company ( a fifth deputy retired ) .
Pembina did not respond to requests for comment , but a spokesperson for the company told local press that it had adjusted its spending while awaiting permits to build .
The sheriff ’ s department met with the company in January to review the unit ’ s expenses and discuss a future agreement .
A follow-up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks .
“ We ’ re going to move forward , basically , ” Zanni said .
He pointed to the 2005 Energy Policy Act as justification for the unit .
The federal law requires fossil fuel companies to come up with a cost-sharing plan with public agencies that have “ responsibility for security and safety ” at LNG export terminal sites .
Zanni shrugged off the fact that the export terminal has not been approved or built yet .
“ As businesspeople , they ’ re pretty confident they ’ re going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” he said of Pembina .
“ My argument is I need the resources before it ’ s going to be built.
” But , if the agreement is renewed , it may be invalid under Oregon law .
In 1998 , the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a similar arrangement in Klamath County , Oregon , where the sheriff ’ s department had entered into an agreement with the timber corporation Weyerhaeuser to provide security services on the company ’ s land .
“ Providing specialized law enforcement services to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sheriff ’ s statutory responsibility to ‘ Defend the county against those who , by riot or otherwise , endanger the public peace or safety , ’ ” the court ruled .
“ We are persuaded that a sheriff lacks the express or implied authority under Oregon law to enter into an agreement to provide security services for private entities.
” “ The court was pretty clear in saying that Oregon law sets out the general authority for governing bodies , and these types of contracts between corporations and police agencies don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” said Kelly Simon , a staff attorney at the Oregon chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union .
“ Contracts like this that are biased and create special-interest groups in government bodies — they are not authorized because the police ’ s authority is to protect the public fairly and equally.
” Zanni said the Coos County Sheriff ’ s Office has had contracts with federal agencies like the Bureau of Land Management as well as private timberland owners that occupy areas that the office otherwise wouldn ’ t have the resources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say if there ’ s a law enforcement public safety need for that officer , we don ’ t care what you ’ re paying us for , he ’ s going to go handle that , ” Zanni said .
Given that the Jordan Cove pipeline and export terminal haven ’ t been approved or built yet , the Pembina-funded unit of the Coos County Sheriff ’ s Office spent a considerable portion of its time and resources monitoring opponents of the energy project , according to email exchanges between law enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sheriff ’ s Deputy Bryan Valencia , whose work was funded by Pembina , operated the email list of the Southwestern Oregon Joint Task Force , an intelligence-sharing group that included officers from the FBI and Bureau of Land Management , as well as state and local law enforcement .
The task force , which was set up to monitor “ the extremist agenda in southern Oregon , ” according to Zanni , circulated posts from activists ’ social media accounts and campaign emails sent by grassroots environmental groups such as Southern Oregon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 350 Eugene .
In January 2019 , Valencia distributed information to the email list about pipeline opponents who had indicated on Facebook that they would attend a demonstration and permitting hearing in North Bend .
“ As of this afternoon there are 98 people RSVP ’ d to attend the rally and Department of State Lands Meeting , ” Valencia wrote .
“ There are another 384 showing ‘ interested.
’ Most of the names are recognized as residents spread across the other three pipeline counties .
There are a few recognized local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is no criminal nexus at this time , ” Valencia acknowledged .
Indeed , the heightened law enforcement scrutiny occurred even though project opponents have mostly refrained from disruptive protests in favor of lobbying , public comment hearings , and peaceful demonstrations .
The most dramatic action came on November 21 , when dozens of people occupied Oregon Gov .
Kate Brown ’ s office in Salem , demanding that she make a statement opposing Jordan Cove .
Brown spoke to the protesters but declined to issue a statement .
“ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the scale one way or another , ” Brown said .
After more than nine hours , state police arrested 21 people , but the district attorney declined to file any charges .
Jordan Cove opponents said the surveillance was disturbing but unsurprising .
“ This should clarify for anyone who still doubts which side the cops are really on and who they are invested in serving , ” said Holly Mills of Southern Oregon Rising Tide .
“ We want to know what ’ s going on , what ’ s being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potential for someone to jump in and create a problem , ” Zanni responded .
“ There are radicals on the protest side ; there are also radicals on the other side .
Extremists of any sort are dangerous.
” As an example , he pointed to protests and counterprotests 200 miles away in Portland involving left-wing anti-fascists and the right-wing hate group the Proud Boys .
Overall , however , he acknowledged that extremists are “ not a big element of Jordan Cove ’ s opposition ” and underlined that he is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But whether or not Zanni took a side , the Pembina funding supported surveillance of pipeline opponents .
Valencia spent about 10 percent of his time monitoring social media while he was part of the LNG unit , Zanni said .
After the Pembina funds ran dry , the deputy was transferred to the corrections division and his intelligence-gathering ceased along with the department ’ s work with the extremism task force .
Throughout its collaboration with Pembina , the Coos County Sheriff ’ s Office was also receiving a steady stream of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public relations firm founded by former aides to Bill and Hillary Clinton helped orchestrate public relations for Pembina while also employing its “ risk advisory ” division — led by former New York City Police Commissioner William Bratton — to keep tabs on Jordan Cove opponents , according to emails , intelligence reports , and notes from agency planning meetings .
Teneo personnel provided daily and weekly reports to Pembina on pipeline opponents ’ activities , which the energy company ’ s in-house security officer routinely shared with the sheriff ’ s office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example , featured screenshots of activists ’ social media feeds and cited a “ flood ” of letters to the editor and op-eds opposing the project .
“ These compelling storylines will facilitate local groups ’ fundraising and outreach efforts to national groups , bolstering the resources at their disposal while also risking the inclusion of national groups willing to pursue more dangerous tactics that would threaten JCP and Pembina , ” the memo stated , encouraging “ active communication efforts to counter their narrative .
Teneo representatives also met directly with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ to compare notes on monitoring activists ” and informed the department that they would begin having “ eyes on the ground ” at local events pertaining to Jordan Cove .
The company appears to have become integrated into law enforcement operations .
In February 2019 , Teneo helped organize a meeting featuring representatives of the National Sheriffs ’ Association , the Oregon State Sheriffs ’ Association , and local sheriffs from counties the pipeline would pass through to coordinate their operations .
The next month , at a multiagency planning meeting regarding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Portland division , Teneo delivered an intelligence briefing to the officers and agents in the audience .
“ It ’ s become very normal for private corporations to be on the same team as law enforcement entities and feeding information , ” Carleton University ’ s Jeff Monaghan said .
“ But in this case , the private entity is actually the one coordinating the fusion of different law enforcement entities .
I ’ ve never seen anything like it.
” In one instance , Teneo Managing Director Jonathan Wackrow asked Coos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ classify information the sheriff ’ s office gathered related to Jordan Cove as “ protected critical infrastructure information ” by sharing it with the Department of Homeland Security and the Oregon TITAN Fusion Center — part of a national counterterrorism intelligence-sharing network .
Doing so would prevent public disclosure of the sheriff ’ s intelligence-gathering activities based on the 2002 Homeland Security Act , Wackrow wrote .
“ We need to formalize this information and ensure that all of the information is labeled as [ protected information ] , ” wrote Wackrow , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ commentator on CNN .
Monaghan expressed alarm that a statute passed in the wake of September 11 , ostensibly to protect U.S. infrastructure against attacks by groups like Al Qaeda , would be repurposed this way .
“ The utilization of that statute is being directed by a private corporation working for a resource company , which is actively directing surveillance activities of a public police agency , ” he said .
“ Clearly , this is not about terrorism , it ’ s not about national security — it ’ s about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Teneo overstepped its role , and the sheriff ’ s office eventually stopped working with the security firm .
He said Teneo attempted to direct the department ’ s activities .
“ They wanted us to be subservient to them and they were going to show us how to do security for them , ” he said .
“ Not in my county.
” Teneo did not respond to requests for comment .
In setting up the November 2018 training for Oregon law enforcement , Strain , the Coos County staff sergeant , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Association for help .
“ It is quite likely that we ’ re going to have Extreme protest here in Coos County and I am hoping to get ahead of the game on the educational media that we could put out , ” he wrote .
“ I would appreciate contact information so we could discuss Options.
” The association ’ s executive director put Strain in touch with Mark Pfeifle , a former national security official in the George W. Bush administration who worked closely with law enforcement on a campaign to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Pfeifle introduced Strain to Nate Johnson ( who also goes by the name Nick Johnson ) , one of the former TigerSwan consultants .
“ We worked with his team to produce videos — documentaries and vignettes — highlighting the challenges at DAPL , ” Pfeifle wrote .
The National Sheriffs ’ Association enlisted Johnson and Robert Rice , another former TigerSwan consultant , to lead a workshop on “ how to engage with the public , track protest leaders and groups , and what to not do on social media to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” according to a training proposal .
During the Dakota Access pipeline fight , Johnson and Rice had created Facebook pages , videos , and websites aimed at inciting local anger against demonstrators — all without revealing their ties to TigerSwan , the security firm working for Dakota Access parent company Energy Transfer .
But newly obtained audio recordings show that the consultants ’ work on behalf of energy interests went beyond online agitating — they also encouraged community members to take action against pipeline opponents on the ground .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ questions of constitutionality if police were to deploy it , according to the ACLU ’ s Simon , since organizing a countercampaign to suppress a political protest would undermine free speech rights .
But private companies typically don ’ t have the same obligation to uphold First Amendment protections .
In August 2017 , Rice and Johnson met with a group of North Dakota residents who had spoken out against protesters in support of local police .
Audio of the meeting was provided to The Intercept and Type Investigations under the condition that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Standing Rock camps had been forcibly evicted more than five months earlier , but Rice sought to convince the group that there was still more work to be done .
“ It is not outside the realm of possibility to , like , start a nonprofit .
We came up with an acronym a couple weeks ago — it was Moms Against Violent Activists , ” Rice said .
“ I ’ m sure a lot of companies would throw money at this.
” He had an idea of who might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ m completely speculating , but you could probably , if you did it right , you could probably get anonymous donations from interested parties .
Cough — oil — cough , ” Rice said .
“ You ’ d be famous , and you ’ d be like , ‘ Wow , we started the Moms Against Angry Violent Activists and Fuck Antifa.
’ And Fox News will be like , ‘ Oh , we want to talk to you !
’ ” At one point during Rice ’ s presentation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Can I ask : Do you have a vested interest ?
” “ I don ’ t have a vested interest other than enjoying the shenanigans , ” Rice replied .
The attendee asked more explicitly .
“ Do y ’ all work for TigerSwan ?
” “ That ’ s a fair question , to which my answer will be , as it was from day one , I am not employed by TigerSwan .
I have not ever been employed by TigerSwan , ” Rice said .
However , he added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with TigerSwan.
” Rice explained that he had acted as a technology and social media adviser to TigerSwan and had a company email address .
“ If you were to call TigerSwan and ask whoever answers the phone , ‘ Does Robert work there ?
’ They ’ d probably say no , but they ’ ll know who I am , because I do go over there.
” The community members came away unimpressed .
“ It was almost like he wanted us to go agitate the protesters , ” one person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ named because they did not want to be associated with Rice , told The Intercept and Type Investigations .
The attendee said Rice spent a few hundred dollars on beer and pizza for the group , which only made the encounter feel more “ sketchy.
” “ All of us that met with him were really confused and just didn ’ t want any part of it.
” An internal TigerSwan document from September 2016 states that Rice was developing an “ information operation ” to confront pipeline opponents , and three former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the security firm during their time there .
Rice had his own office in TigerSwan ’ s building and was there several days a week , according to two of the sources .
“ He had a significant presence at TigerSwan for a guy that didn ’ t work for TigerSwan , ” one of the contractors said , adding that Rice routinely attended meetings with senior staff .
One of the contractors said Johnson worked with Rice in the TigerSwan office at times .
Johnson is also credited as “ camera @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Standing Rock movement , which was produced by a pro-Dakota Access pipeline organization Rice founded .
Neither Rice nor Johnson responded to requests for comment .
TigerSwan and Energy Transfer also declined to respond .
The same month that Johnson and Rice gave their presentation in North Dakota , a Facebook page called PA Progress began posting about opponents of Energy Transfer ’ s Mariner East 2 pipeline in Huntingdon County , Pennsylvania , portraying them as cynical profiteers with a penchant for violence .
In particular , the page sought to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who had invited activists to camp out in trees on their property in the pipeline ’ s path to slow down construction .
A video posted by PA Progress spliced together chaotic footage of unrelated riots , while an actor posing as a local community member noted that the Gerharts were “ actively recruiting other anarchists to the area.
” Bothered by the tenor of the Facebook posts , Grant Stewart , a local resident , arranged a phone call with the page ’ s administrator , “ Nate.
” Stewart had seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and someone had posted a photo from the Gerharts ’ driveway .
He wondered what kinds of actions PA Progress was promoting .
Stewart took careful notes on the exchange , which he shared with The Intercept and Type Investigations .
Nate encouraged Stewart to drive past the Gerharts ’ home and capture video footage , which he promised to post on the Facebook page .
Anything that could be reported to police , he assured , could help bring an end to the tree-sit .
According to Stewart , when he asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the protesters to intimidate them , Nate replied that a more effective tactic would be to make noise by setting off fireworks or M-80s — or firing gunshots .
A week later , Paste magazine published an article linking Nate Johnson to the PA Progress page .
Nate “ fell off the face of the earth , ” as Stewart put it , and the Facebook page came down soon after .
But the posts on PA Progress had already prompted threats of gun violence against Elise Gerhart and her family .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would hire someone who is responsible for the kinds of dangerous online hit pieces that targeted me and my family , simply because we stood up for ourselves and our land against a dangerous pipeline , ” Gerhart said in an interview .
Law enforcement officers from across Oregon attended the November 2018 training that Johnson and Rice conducted in North Bend , a roster acquired via open records request shows .
Security personnel for Pembina and the Oregon-based timber corporation Roseburg Forest Products were also on hand .
The new details about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous operations raise questions about the kinds of tactics that public safety officers consider appropriate and are learning to deploy .
The National Sheriffs ’ Association , which organized the event , didn ’ t respond to requests for comment .
If the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approves the project , Pembina could begin preliminary construction — including tree felling along the pipeline route — this spring .
To complete construction of the pipeline , however , the company will have to obtain a number of permits from Oregon state agencies .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Quality ruled against granting Jordan Cove a Clean Water Act permit , dealing the project a major setback .
Last month , Pembina abruptly withdrew an application to remove sediment from Coos Bay to make way for the terminal after the Oregon Department of State Lands denied its request for a deadline extension .
Although some project opponents celebrated , other analysts have speculated that the company may be hoping federal approvals will provide leverage to convince the state to get on board .
The Trump administration is already seeking changes that would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ permits .
In April , Trump signed two executive orders designed to speed up oil and gas pipeline projects .
One of the orders instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to review a section of the Clean Water Act that requires corporations to obtain the approval of state governments for pipeline construction .
In effect , the order could eliminate the authority of state environmental agencies to decide the fate of projects like Jordan Cove .
“ Too often badly needed energy infrastructure is being held back by special-interest groups , entrenched bureaucracies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in announcing the order .
The EPA ’ s review is still pending .
Meanwhile , Jordan Cove opponents will likely step up their efforts to pressure Brown and other members of her administration to use their authority to force the project ’ s cancelation .
Owen Walker , a member of Southern Oregon Rising Tide , said the occupation of the governor ’ s office grew out of mounting frustration with her unwillingness to live up to her rhetoric on the urgency of the climate crisis .
“ If Governor Brown cares @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims to , there ’ s no reason she shouldn ’ t oppose Jordan Cove LNG today .
Governors in New York and Washington have come out publicly against similar fracked gas projects , ” Walker said .
“ It ’ s time for Governor Brown to be a climate leader by opposing this project.
” Another participant in the demonstration at Brown ’ s office , Thomas Joseph II of the Hoopa Valley Tribe , was among those who protested the Dakota Access pipeline .
He and others from the Klamath River @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Standing Rock for six months , running a free kitchen and participating in direct actions .
“ Part of our stand was to learn by firsthand experience how to defend your community against a pipeline , ” he said .
The Pacific Connecter pipeline is slated to pass under the Klamath River , the lifeline of a number of West Coast Indigenous nations , including the Hoopa .
Joseph said the alignment of public and private security forces against Jordan Cove opponents does not intimidate him .
“ We know their tactics .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ he said .
Fossil fuel companies and law enforcement agencies may be sharing resources and information gleaned from past protests .
But he suggested that , at the end of the day , protesters are learning from their previous struggles as well .
“ If they think we ’ re going to do the same thing we did at Standing Rock , ” Joseph said , “ that is their fault.
” This article was reported in partnership with Type Investigations .

A t a casino in the small coastal town of North Bend, Oregon, dozens of law enforcement officers and corporate security personnel gathered for a two-day training on how to wage propaganda battles against protesters. The November 2018 event was organized by the National Sheriffs’ Association, one of the country’s largest law enforcement organizations, and hosted by the Coos County Sheriff’s Office, which has spent years monitoring opposition to the Jordan Cove Energy Project — a proposed liquid natural gas pipeline and export terminal that the Trump administration has named one of its highest-priority infrastructure projects.
The cost of the event, however — totaling $26,250 — was paid by Pembina Pipeline Corp., the Canadian fossil fuel company that owns the Jordan Cove project.
In fact, for nearly four years, Pembina was the sole funding source of a unit in the sheriff’s office dedicated to handling security concerns related to Jordan Cove — despite the fact that there is not yet any physical infrastructure in place to keep secure. The pipeline and terminal cannot begin construction without approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which is scheduled to vote on whether to license the project in February. Yet between 2016 and 2020, the department’s liquid natural gas division, known as a “combined services unit,” spent at least $2 million of Pembina’s money. The energy company put the funding on hold in April 2019 but left open the possibility that the arrangement could be revived in the future. Pembina and the sheriff’s department are currently discussing how they may continue to work together, and Coos County Sheriff Craig Zanni said he expects the partnership to be renewed.
In addition to hosting the law enforcement training, the unit used Pembina’s funds to purchase riot control equipment, monitor the activities of Jordan Cove opponents, and coordinate intelligence-gathering operations with private security companies that also worked for Pembina. Local residents, environmental activists, and tribal members have staged rallies and sit-ins and participated in public hearings in opposition to the project, which they say would exacerbate the global climate crisis, damage vital waterways, and violate Indigenous sovereignty. Dozens of property owners could see their land seized via eminent domain.
Law enforcement agencies often receive funding for equipment via corporate-backed professional associations and private foundations — a practice that civil liberties groups have criticized as enabling private influence with little oversight. The arrangement between Pembina and the Coos County Sheriff’s Office was unusual, however, given the department’s scrutiny of activists engaged in First Amendment-protected speech in opposition to its corporate benefactor.
“It’s stunning. It’s the complete opposite of how the police have presented themselves in recent history — that they are neutral parties positioned above the political fray,” said Jeff Monaghan, a criminology professor at Canada’s Carleton University who studies police surveillance. “This is a public police force that has essentially opened up a private, corporately funded wing and, in doing so, is entrenching itself on one side of a very complicated political debate.”
The Coos County partnership is an extreme example of a trend in policing that has gained momentum across the United States — particularly since thousands of protesters from around the world gathered at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota in 2016 and 2017 in an effort to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. Corporations are developing creative means to funnel millions of dollars to local law enforcement groups, and this funding has often been paired with increasingly elaborate private security and propaganda operations.
An investigation by The Intercept and Type Investigations, based on more than 15,000 pages of documents obtained via open records requests from the Coos County Sheriff’s Office and the city of Portland, sheds light on the fusion of public and private interests working to monitor and stymie opposition to the Jordan Cove Energy Project. The documents also reveal new details about a network of private actors profiting off the suppression of protest movements nationwide, among them veterans of the Dakota Access pipeline campaign who have since contributed to the policing efforts around Jordan Cove.
The global consulting firm Teneo led Jordan Cove-related communications and intelligence operations on behalf of Pembina, producing regular reports on the activities of opponents and helping coordinate the efforts of federal, state, and local law enforcement, including the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and county sheriff’s offices, the records show.
At the November 2018 training paid for by Pembina, one workshop was led by employees of Delve, a Washington, D.C.-based opposition research firm affiliated with the national Republican Party that worked alongside police during the Dakota Access pipeline protests.
Another was led by former consultants for TigerSwan, the defense firm hired to oversee security of the Dakota Access pipeline that came under fire for its militaristic approach to protesters. The two former consultants enlisted to train Oregon law enforcement had previously attempted to organize pro-pipeline counterprotests, according to leaked audio recordings, encouraging dangerous tactics and at one point dangling the prospect of anonymous donations from oil companies.
“Pembina and other corporations are trying to build out the infrastructure now to lock us, as a planet, into using big reserves of fossil fuel,” said Brendan McQuade, assistant professor of criminology at the University of Southern Maine and author of a recently released book on police fusion centers. “The most distressing element of these documents is that they show the police both locally and nationally lining up, in a rigid way, behind corporations carrying out fossil fuel extraction.”
Purchasing Police Power
First proposed in 2005, the Jordan Cove Energy Project has become one of the longest-running battles in the country between the fossil fuel industry and opponents of new hydrocarbon energy infrastructure. If built, the project would transport 438 billion cubic feet of natural gas per year from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, the Jonah Field in Wyoming, the Piceance Basin in Colorado, and the Uinta Basin in northern Utah. The 233-mile Pacific Connector gas pipeline would snake beneath five major rivers as it pumps natural gas to a new export terminal at Coos Bay, where the gas would be chilled and liquefied before being carried to Asian markets on massive tankers.
Map: Soohee Cho/The Intercept
In 2016, landowners in the pipeline’s proposed path successfully lobbied the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which provides permits for the construction of natural gas infrastructure, to deny an application to build the project. The agency asserted that developers had not proven the need for it. Pembina reapplied a year later, in the wake of Donald Trump’s election.
Since then, Trump has appointed individuals to the five-member commission who are more in favor of fossil fuel projects than their predecessors, including Neil Chatterjee, who previously served as energy policy adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. A decision by the FERC is expected on February 13.
In the meantime, grassroots environmental groups have helped rally tens of thousands of people to submit comments opposing Jordan Cove to state and federal permitting agencies. The Karuk, Yurok, Klamath, Tolowa Dee-ni’, Siletz, and Round Valley tribes have all passed resolutions opposing the project.
On a misty morning in August, Larry Mangan, a retired Bureau of Land Management biologist, stood on the shores of Coos Bay overlooking the proposed site of the Jordan Cove export terminal. The land on which he and his wife, Sylvia, have lived for more than 30 years is in one of the proposed paths of the Pacific Connector pipeline, and a portion of it is threatened with eminent domain.
“This project would be a disaster not just for us, but for our entire area,” Maghan said. “It’s almost unthinkable that our local police force would be so invested in it.”
The LNG division of the Coos County Sheriff’s Office was established in December 2015. At the time, the Jordan Cove project was owned by the energy infrastructure company Veresen, which Pembina acquired in 2017. Coos County Sheriff Zanni said the department expected Jordan Cove to create an array of security needs. Coos Bay is popular with anglers, crabbers, and recreational boaters who would share the space with giant LNG carriers, and he believed the terminal could become a target for terrorism.
According to county expenditure records, the Pembina-funded sheriff’s unit spent at least $1.2 million on salaries, benefits, and overtime between 2016 and 2020. The sheriff’s office also used money from Pembina to acquire equipment and technology that would allow deputies to monitor environmental activists and respond forcefully to potential protests. Last year, the department spent $48,250 of Pembina funds on an acoustic sound cannon and paid for repairs to a Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected tactical vehicle — a type of armored vehicle first developed for the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan that police have also used in the streets of Ferguson and at Standing Rock. The department also purchased social media archiving software and a drone.
The sound cannon was a response to what happened at Standing Rock, according to Zanni, who said he wanted a “more humane way” to deal with protesters that would avoid physical confrontation. As for the MRAP, the armored vehicle the department had obtained via the federal government’s surplus military property program was in a state of disrepair. Zanni said the vehicle had “technically nothing” to do with Jordan Cove. “It’s called leveraging for the better of the community,” he added.
Zanni described the sheriff’s office as “severely underfunded.” The department used to rely on proceeds from timber harvests on federal land to pay its bills, but that funding dropped dramatically in recent decades.
When Pembina discontinued funding in April, the sheriff’s office had enough remaining money for the unit to finish out the year. In December, the department was forced to absorb four deputies whose salaries had been paid for by the company (a fifth deputy retired). Pembina did not respond to requests for comment, but a spokesperson for the company told local press that it had adjusted its spending while awaiting permits to build.
The sheriff’s department met with the company in January to review the unit’s expenses and discuss a future agreement. A follow-up meeting has been scheduled for the coming weeks. “We’re going to move forward, basically,” Zanni said.
He pointed to the 2005 Energy Policy Act as justification for the unit. The federal law requires fossil fuel companies to come up with a cost-sharing plan with public agencies that have “responsibility for security and safety” at LNG export terminal sites. Zanni shrugged off the fact that the export terminal has not been approved or built yet. “As businesspeople, they’re pretty confident they’re going to get permission to do that,” he said of Pembina. “My argument is I need the resources before it’s going to be built.”
But, if the agreement is renewed, it may be invalid under Oregon law. In 1998, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a similar arrangement in Klamath County, Oregon, where the sheriff’s department had entered into an agreement with the timber corporation Weyerhaeuser to provide security services on the company’s land.
“Providing specialized law enforcement services to Weyerhaeuser has no logical relationship to a sheriff’s statutory responsibility to ‘Defend the county against those who, by riot or otherwise, endanger the public peace or safety,’” the court ruled. “We are persuaded that a sheriff lacks the express or implied authority under Oregon law to enter into an agreement to provide security services for private entities.”
“The court was pretty clear in saying that Oregon law sets out the general authority for governing bodies, and these types of contracts between corporations and police agencies don’t fit into that general authority,” said Kelly Simon, a staff attorney at the Oregon chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. “Contracts like this that are biased and create special-interest groups in government bodies — they are not authorized because the police’s authority is to protect the public fairly and equally.”
Zanni said the Coos County Sheriff’s Office has had contracts with federal agencies like the Bureau of Land Management as well as private timberland owners that occupy areas that the office otherwise wouldn’t have the resources to patrol. “Our contracts specifically say if there’s a law enforcement public safety need for that officer, we don’t care what you’re paying us for, he’s going to go handle that,” Zanni said.
Illustration: Alex Petrowsky for The Intercept
Public-Private Surveillance
Given that the Jordan Cove pipeline and export terminal haven’t been approved or built yet, the Pembina-funded unit of the Coos County Sheriff’s Office spent a considerable portion of its time and resources monitoring opponents of the energy project, according to email exchanges between law enforcement officers and Pembina employees.
Coos County Sheriff’s Deputy Bryan Valencia, whose work was funded by Pembina, operated the email list of the Southwestern Oregon Joint Task Force, an intelligence-sharing group that included officers from the FBI and Bureau of Land Management, as well as state and local law enforcement. The task force, which was set up to monitor “the extremist agenda in southern Oregon,” according to Zanni, circulated posts from activists’ social media accounts and campaign emails sent by grassroots environmental groups such as Southern Oregon Rising Tide, Rogue Climate, and 350 Eugene.
In January 2019, Valencia distributed information to the email list about pipeline opponents who had indicated on Facebook that they would attend a demonstration and permitting hearing in North Bend.
“As of this afternoon there are 98 people RSVP’d to attend the rally and Department of State Lands Meeting,” Valencia wrote. “There are another 384 showing ‘interested.’ Most of the names are recognized as residents spread across the other three pipeline counties. There are a few recognized local names associated with previous rallies.”
“There is no criminal nexus at this time,” Valencia acknowledged.
Indeed, the heightened law enforcement scrutiny occurred even though project opponents have mostly refrained from disruptive protests in favor of lobbying, public comment hearings, and peaceful demonstrations.
The most dramatic action came on November 21, when dozens of people occupied Oregon Gov. Kate Brown’s office in Salem, demanding that she make a statement opposing Jordan Cove. Brown spoke to the protesters but declined to issue a statement. “I’m not putting my finger on the scale one way or another,” Brown said. After more than nine hours, state police arrested 21 people, but the district attorney declined to file any charges.
Jordan Cove opponents said the surveillance was disturbing but unsurprising. “This should clarify for anyone who still doubts which side the cops are really on and who they are invested in serving,” said Holly Mills of Southern Oregon Rising Tide.
“We want to know what’s going on, what’s being planned, and if there’s potential for someone to jump in and create a problem,” Zanni responded. “There are radicals on the protest side; there are also radicals on the other side. Extremists of any sort are dangerous.” As an example, he pointed to protests and counterprotests 200 miles away in Portland involving left-wing anti-fascists and the right-wing hate group the Proud Boys.
Overall, however, he acknowledged that extremists are “not a big element of Jordan Cove’s opposition” and underlined that he is not for or against the project.
But whether or not Zanni took a side, the Pembina funding supported surveillance of pipeline opponents. Valencia spent about 10 percent of his time monitoring social media while he was part of the LNG unit, Zanni said. After the Pembina funds ran dry, the deputy was transferred to the corrections division and his intelligence-gathering ceased along with the department’s work with the extremism task force.
Throughout its collaboration with Pembina, the Coos County Sheriff’s Office was also receiving a steady stream of intelligence from Teneo. The security and public relations firm founded by former aides to Bill and Hillary Clinton helped orchestrate public relations for Pembina while also employing its “risk advisory” division — led by former New York City Police Commissioner William Bratton — to keep tabs on Jordan Cove opponents, according to emails, intelligence reports, and notes from agency planning meetings.
Teneo personnel provided daily and weekly reports to Pembina on pipeline opponents’ activities, which the energy company’s in-house security officer routinely shared with the sheriff’s office. A January 2019 intelligence report, for example, featured screenshots of activists’ social media feeds and cited a “flood” of letters to the editor and op-eds opposing the project. “These compelling storylines will facilitate local groups’ fundraising and outreach efforts to national groups, bolstering the resources at their disposal while also risking the inclusion of national groups willing to pursue more dangerous tactics that would threaten JCP and Pembina,” the memo stated, encouraging “active communication efforts to counter their narrative.
Teneo representatives also met directly with members of the sheriff’s office “to compare notes on monitoring activists” and informed the department that they would begin having “eyes on the ground” at local events pertaining to Jordan Cove.
The company appears to have become integrated into law enforcement operations. In February 2019, Teneo helped organize a meeting featuring representatives of the National Sheriffs’ Association, the Oregon State Sheriffs’ Association, and local sheriffs from counties the pipeline would pass through to coordinate their operations. The next month, at a multiagency planning meeting regarding Jordan Cove organized by the FBI’s Portland division, Teneo delivered an intelligence briefing to the officers and agents in the audience.
“It’s become very normal for private corporations to be on the same team as law enforcement entities and feeding information,” Carleton University’s Jeff Monaghan said. “But in this case, the private entity is actually the one coordinating the fusion of different law enforcement entities. I’ve never seen anything like it.”
In one instance, Teneo Managing Director Jonathan Wackrow asked Coos County Staff Sgt. Doug Strain to classify information the sheriff’s office gathered related to Jordan Cove as “protected critical infrastructure information” by sharing it with the Department of Homeland Security and the Oregon TITAN Fusion Center — part of a national counterterrorism intelligence-sharing network. Doing so would prevent public disclosure of the sheriff’s intelligence-gathering activities based on the 2002 Homeland Security Act, Wackrow wrote.
“We need to formalize this information and ensure that all of the information is labeled as [protected information],” wrote Wackrow, who is also a frequent law enforcement commentator on CNN.
Monaghan expressed alarm that a statute passed in the wake of September 11, ostensibly to protect U.S. infrastructure against attacks by groups like Al Qaeda, would be repurposed this way. “The utilization of that statute is being directed by a private corporation working for a resource company, which is actively directing surveillance activities of a public police agency,” he said. “Clearly, this is not about terrorism, it’s not about national security — it’s about domestic policing.”
According to Zanni, Teneo overstepped its role, and the sheriff’s office eventually stopped working with the security firm. He said Teneo attempted to direct the department’s activities. “They wanted us to be subservient to them and they were going to show us how to do security for them,” he said. “Not in my county.”
Teneo did not respond to requests for comment.
“Paid Protesters” and Propagandists
In setting up the November 2018 training for Oregon law enforcement, Strain, the Coos County staff sergeant, reached out to the National Sheriffs’ Association for help. “It is quite likely that we’re going to have Extreme protest here in Coos County and I am hoping to get ahead of the game on the educational media that we could put out,” he wrote. “I would appreciate contact information so we could discuss Options.”
Robert Rice, left, and Nate Johnson, right, at a meeting they held in North Dakota in August 2017, in which they encouraged locals to “fight back” against oil pipeline opponents. Photos: Provided to The Intercept
The association’s executive director put Strain in touch with Mark Pfeifle, a former national security official in the George W. Bush administration who worked closely with law enforcement on a campaign to discredit activists during the Standing Rock uprising. Pfeifle introduced Strain to Nate Johnson (who also goes by the name Nick Johnson), one of the former TigerSwan consultants. “We worked with his team to produce videos — documentaries and vignettes — highlighting the challenges at DAPL,” Pfeifle wrote. The National Sheriffs’ Association enlisted Johnson and Robert Rice, another former TigerSwan consultant, to lead a workshop on “how to engage with the public, track protest leaders and groups, and what to not do on social media to take charge of the message early on,” according to a training proposal.
During the Dakota Access pipeline fight, Johnson and Rice had created Facebook pages, videos, and websites aimed at inciting local anger against demonstrators — all without revealing their ties to TigerSwan, the security firm working for Dakota Access parent company Energy Transfer. But newly obtained audio recordings show that the consultants’ work on behalf of energy interests went beyond online agitating — they also encouraged community members to take action against pipeline opponents on the ground.
It’s a tactic that would raise serious questions of constitutionality if police were to deploy it, according to the ACLU’s Simon, since organizing a countercampaign to suppress a political protest would undermine free speech rights. But private companies typically don’t have the same obligation to uphold First Amendment protections.
In August 2017, Rice and Johnson met with a group of North Dakota residents who had spoken out against protesters in support of local police. Audio of the meeting was provided to The Intercept and Type Investigations under the condition that the names of attendees not be disclosed. The Standing Rock camps had been forcibly evicted more than five months earlier, but Rice sought to convince the group that there was still more work to be done.
“It is not outside the realm of possibility to, like, start a nonprofit. We came up with an acronym a couple weeks ago — it was Moms Against Violent Activists,” Rice said. “I’m sure a lot of companies would throw money at this.”
He had an idea of who might fund such an endeavor. “I’m completely speculating, but you could probably, if you did it right, you could probably get anonymous donations from interested parties. Cough — oil — cough,” Rice said. “You’d be famous, and you’d be like, ‘Wow, we started the Moms Against Angry Violent Activists and Fuck Antifa.’ And Fox News will be like, ‘Oh, we want to talk to you!’”
At one point during Rice’s presentation, one of the attendees interjected. “Can I ask: Do you have a vested interest?”
“I don’t have a vested interest other than enjoying the shenanigans,” Rice replied.
The attendee asked more explicitly. “Do y’all work for TigerSwan?”
“That’s a fair question, to which my answer will be, as it was from day one, I am not employed by TigerSwan. I have not ever been employed by TigerSwan,” Rice said. However, he added, “I do have a relationship with TigerSwan.” Rice explained that he had acted as a technology and social media adviser to TigerSwan and had a company email address. “If you were to call TigerSwan and ask whoever answers the phone, ‘Does Robert work there?’ They’d probably say no, but they’ll know who I am, because I do go over there.”
The community members came away unimpressed. “It was almost like he wanted us to go agitate the protesters,” one person who attended, who declined to be named because they did not want to be associated with Rice, told The Intercept and Type Investigations. The attendee said Rice spent a few hundred dollars on beer and pizza for the group, which only made the encounter feel more “sketchy.” “All of us that met with him were really confused and just didn’t want any part of it.”
An internal TigerSwan document from September 2016 states that Rice was developing an “information operation” to confront pipeline opponents, and three former TigerSwan contractors confirmed that Rice had worked for the security firm during their time there. Rice had his own office in TigerSwan’s building and was there several days a week, according to two of the sources. “He had a significant presence at TigerSwan for a guy that didn’t work for TigerSwan,” one of the contractors said, adding that Rice routinely attended meetings with senior staff. One of the contractors said Johnson worked with Rice in the TigerSwan office at times. Johnson is also credited as “camera and editor” on a documentary criticizing the Standing Rock movement, which was produced by a pro-Dakota Access pipeline organization Rice founded.
Neither Rice nor Johnson responded to requests for comment. TigerSwan and Energy Transfer also declined to respond.
The same month that Johnson and Rice gave their presentation in North Dakota, a Facebook page called PA Progress began posting about opponents of Energy Transfer’s Mariner East 2 pipeline in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania, portraying them as cynical profiteers with a penchant for violence. In particular, the page sought to “expose” the Gerhart family, who had invited activists to camp out in trees on their property in the pipeline’s path to slow down construction. A video posted by PA Progress spliced together chaotic footage of unrelated riots, while an actor posing as a local community member noted that the Gerharts were “actively recruiting other anarchists to the area.”
Bothered by the tenor of the Facebook posts, Grant Stewart, a local resident, arranged a phone call with the page’s administrator, “Nate.” Stewart had seen online conversations about disrupting the tree-sit, and someone had posted a photo from the Gerharts’ driveway. He wondered what kinds of actions PA Progress was promoting. Stewart took careful notes on the exchange, which he shared with The Intercept and Type Investigations.
Nate encouraged Stewart to drive past the Gerharts’ home and capture video footage, which he promised to post on the Facebook page. Anything that could be reported to police, he assured, could help bring an end to the tree-sit. According to Stewart, when he asked what Nate thought about shining headlights on the protesters to intimidate them, Nate replied that a more effective tactic would be to make noise by setting off fireworks or M-80s — or firing gunshots.
A week later, Paste magazine published an article linking Nate Johnson to the PA Progress page. Nate “fell off the face of the earth,” as Stewart put it, and the Facebook page came down soon after. But the posts on PA Progress had already prompted threats of gun violence against Elise Gerhart and her family. “It’s outrageous that police themselves would hire someone who is responsible for the kinds of dangerous online hit pieces that targeted me and my family, simply because we stood up for ourselves and our land against a dangerous pipeline,” Gerhart said in an interview.
Law enforcement officers from across Oregon attended the November 2018 training that Johnson and Rice conducted in North Bend, a roster acquired via open records request shows. Security personnel for Pembina and the Oregon-based timber corporation Roseburg Forest Products were also on hand. The new details about Rice’s and Johnson’s previous operations raise questions about the kinds of tactics that public safety officers consider appropriate and are learning to deploy. The National Sheriffs’ Association, which organized the event, didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Opposing Jordan Cove
If the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approves the project, Pembina could begin preliminary construction — including tree felling along the pipeline route — this spring. To complete construction of the pipeline, however, the company will have to obtain a number of permits from Oregon state agencies.
In May, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ruled against granting Jordan Cove a Clean Water Act permit, dealing the project a major setback. Last month, Pembina abruptly withdrew an application to remove sediment from Coos Bay to make way for the terminal after the Oregon Department of State Lands denied its request for a deadline extension. Although some project opponents celebrated, other analysts have speculated that the company may be hoping federal approvals will provide leverage to convince the state to get on board.
The Trump administration is already seeking changes that would allow the federal government to override state permits. In April, Trump signed two executive orders designed to speed up oil and gas pipeline projects. One of the orders instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to review a section of the Clean Water Act that requires corporations to obtain the approval of state governments for pipeline construction. In effect, the order could eliminate the authority of state environmental agencies to decide the fate of projects like Jordan Cove.
“Too often badly needed energy infrastructure is being held back by special-interest groups, entrenched bureaucracies, and radical activists,” Trump stated in announcing the order. The EPA’s review is still pending.
Meanwhile, Jordan Cove opponents will likely step up their efforts to pressure Brown and other members of her administration to use their authority to force the project’s cancelation. Owen Walker, a member of Southern Oregon Rising Tide, said the occupation of the governor’s office grew out of mounting frustration with her unwillingness to live up to her rhetoric on the urgency of the climate crisis.
Demonstrators occupy the office of Gov. Kate Brown in Salem, Ore., on Nov. 21, 2019, to demand that she stand against a proposed liquid natural gas pipeline and export terminal. Photo: Andrew Selsky/AP
“If Governor Brown cares about climate change as much as she claims to, there’s no reason she shouldn’t oppose Jordan Cove LNG today. Governors in New York and Washington have come out publicly against similar fracked gas projects,” Walker said. “It’s time for Governor Brown to be a climate leader by opposing this project.”
Another participant in the demonstration at Brown’s office, Thomas Joseph II of the Hoopa Valley Tribe, was among those who protested the Dakota Access pipeline. He and others from the Klamath River basin in California and Oregon camped near Standing Rock for six months, running a free kitchen and participating in direct actions. “Part of our stand was to learn by firsthand experience how to defend your community against a pipeline,” he said. The Pacific Connecter pipeline is slated to pass under the Klamath River, the lifeline of a number of West Coast Indigenous nations, including the Hoopa.
Joseph said the alignment of public and private security forces against Jordan Cove opponents does not intimidate him. “We know their tactics. We know their thought process,” he said. Fossil fuel companies and law enforcement agencies may be sharing resources and information gleaned from past protests. But he suggested that, at the end of the day, protesters are learning from their previous struggles as well. “If they think we’re going to do the same thing we did at Standing Rock,” Joseph said, “that is their fault.”
Correction: February 18, 2020
An earlier version of this article misspelled the name of Coos Bay resident Larry Mangan. The article has also been updated to include Canadian sources of natural gas that would likely supply the Jordan Cove project.
This article was reported in partnership with Type Investigations.


theintercept--2020-02-12--The Pundits Wrote Off Bernie’s Candidacy. In Iowa and New Hampshire, He Proved Them Wrong.

What a difference a year makes .
When he launched his second presidential campaign , in February 2019 , the independent senator from Vermont was mocked and written off by much of the pundit class .
The Washington Post ’ s Henry Olsen called him a “ one-hit wonder , ” adding : “ After a few concerts that attract ever more ‘ selective ’ audiences , he will likely drop out and retire , his influence consigned to history.
” ( On Monday night , a whopping 7,500 people turned out for a Sanders rally headlined by Rep. Alexandria @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Strokes , in Durham , New Hampshire . )
And yesterday , in New Hampshire , Sanders won with a narrow victory over former South Bend , Indiana , Mayor Pete Buttigieg .
Biden came in fifth .
On Monday , he took the lead in a national Quinnipiac University poll for the first time in the 2020 Democratic race .
Last week , in the Iowa caucuses , Sanders won the popular vote by a clear margin in both the first and second rounds .
Bernie Sanders is now the undisputed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidential nomination .
On Twitter , Olsen ’ s fellow Post columnist Jennifer Rubin described Sanders as “ yesterday ’ s news ” and suggested he would face “ stiff competition for youth vote ” from Beto O ’ Rourke .
( O ’ Rourke quit the race in November , while Sanders won almost half of 17- to 29-year-olds in Iowa and more young voters in New Hampshire than “ all of the other candidates combined.
” ) Yet another Post columnist , David Von Drehle , wrote how Sanders would find @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his agenda absorbed by more plausible candidates , his future behind him.
” Then there was MSNBC host Chris Matthews , who claimed Sen. Elizabeth Warren would “ blow out Bernie pretty early on .
Bernie will lose his votes to her.
” ( Warren , for the record , came third in Iowa and fourth in New Hampshire . )
MSNBC political contributor Jason Johnson went even further : “ I see Bernie Sanders launching his campaign and by August , realizing he won ’ t be in the top five in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they never learn ?
For the second presidential cycle in a row , the political pundits have had to eat crow .
During the 2016 race , former Obama strategist David Axelrod dismissed Sanders as the candidate with whom Democratic voters would only “ flirt ” or have a “ fling ” with .
The Vermont senator went on to win 13 million votes and 23 states .
Four years later , Sanders has come from behind to dominate the first two contests of the 2020 Democratic race .
In Iowa , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recanvass of the chaotic and messy results .
Remember : Over the past four decades , no candidate has won in both Iowa and New Hampshire and then failed to win the nomination .
Sanders beat Buttigieg by only a narrow margin in New Hampshire — especially compared to his 22-point victory over Hillary Clinton in the Granite State in 2016 .
Yet a win is a win , especially in the crowded 2020 field , and the only democratic socialist in this race now has what the New York Times has rightly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of assets : momentum.
” Up next are the Nevada caucuses on February 22 , where only a single percentage point separates Biden from Sanders .
In South Carolina , which goes to the polls on February 29 and where Biden once led by a whopping 31 points , Sanders has narrowed the former vice president ’ s lead to 8 points in the latest Zogby Analytics poll .
Biden , though , is in freefall : an embarrassing fourth in Iowa , a humiliating fifth in New Hampshire .
Back in December @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media organizations were ignoring the possibility that Sanders could win three of the first four states .
In fact , he could now end up winning all four of them .
No wonder Democratic Party elites are panicking .
We hear the same tired arguments about Sanders lacking “ electability.
” These arguments conveniently ignore the fact that Sanders beats Trump in head-to-head polling ; that the Vermont senator is the most popular member of the Senate ; and that this self-proclaimed socialist has both the highest “ net favorability rating ” among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enthusiastic base .
Plus , the only way to test “ electability ” is through actual elections , and so far Sanders is two for two .
Iowa and New Hampshire , though , weren ’ t only victories for the senator from Vermont ; they were also victories for Sanders ’ s signature issue , Medicare for All .
Asked last week in an entrance poll how they felt about “ replacing all private health insurance with a single government plan for everyone , ” 57 percent of Iowa caucus-goers said they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were opposed .
In New Hampshire , on Tuesday , again almost six in 10 voters said they supported a Medicare for All system over the current private insurance system , according to an early exit poll .
Yet again , the pundits and prognosticators were wrong .
“ Iowa Democrats worry ‘ Medicare for All ’ hurts key industry , ” read the headline in the Associated Press in December .
“ In Iowa , Single Payer ‘ Medicare For All ’ Loses Ground , ” declared Forbes in August .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Popular — Even Among Democrats , ” proclaimed FiveThirtyEight ’ s Nate Silver a month earlier .
“ We ’ ve heard a lot about how Bernie Sanders is so ‘ wildly out-of-touch ’ with the Democratic electorate , ” observed CNN contributor Kirsten Powers on Tuesday night .
“ Well , that ’ s not actually true.
” The message from Iowa and New Hampshire is clear .
It was a big , big mistake to write off both Bernie Sanders and his No .
1 policy proposal .
So going forward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mistake again ?

Photo: John Locher/AP
Goodbye, Joe Biden.
Bernie Sanders is now the undisputed frontrunner in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Last week, in the Iowa caucuses, Sanders won the popular vote by a clear margin in both the first and second rounds.
On Monday, he took the lead in a national Quinnipiac University poll for the first time in the 2020 Democratic race.
And yesterday, in New Hampshire, Sanders won with a narrow victory over former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg. Biden came in fifth.
What a difference a year makes. When he launched his second presidential campaign, in February 2019, the independent senator from Vermont was mocked and written off by much of the pundit class. The Washington Post’s Henry Olsen called him a “one-hit wonder,” adding: “After a few concerts that attract ever more ‘selective’ audiences, he will likely drop out and retire, his influence consigned to history.” (On Monday night, a whopping 7,500 people turned out for a Sanders rally headlined by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as well as rock band The Strokes, in Durham, New Hampshire.)
On Twitter, Olsen’s fellow Post columnist Jennifer Rubin described Sanders as “yesterday’s news” and suggested he would face “stiff competition for youth vote” from Beto O’Rourke. (O’Rourke quit the race in November, while Sanders won almost half of 17- to 29-year-olds in Iowa and more young voters in New Hampshire than “all of the other candidates combined.”)
Yet another Post columnist, David Von Drehle, wrote how Sanders would find “that his moment is gone, his agenda absorbed by more plausible candidates, his future behind him.”
Then there was MSNBC host Chris Matthews, who claimed Sen. Elizabeth Warren would “blow out Bernie pretty early on. Bernie will lose his votes to her.” (Warren, for the record, came third in Iowa and fourth in New Hampshire.)
MSNBC political contributor Jason Johnson went even further: “I see Bernie Sanders launching his campaign and by August, realizing he won’t be in the top five in Iowa, and dropping out.”
Do they never learn? For the second presidential cycle in a row, the political pundits have had to eat crow. During the 2016 race, former Obama strategist David Axelrod dismissed Sanders as the candidate with whom Democratic voters would only “flirt” or have a “fling” with. The Vermont senator went on to win 13 million votes and 23 states.
Four years later, Sanders has come from behind to dominate the first two contests of the 2020 Democratic race. In Iowa, he declared victory while calling for a partial recanvass of the chaotic and messy results. Remember: Over the past four decades, no candidate has won in both Iowa and New Hampshire and then failed to win the nomination.
Sanders beat Buttigieg by only a narrow margin in New Hampshire — especially compared to his 22-point victory over Hillary Clinton in the Granite State in 2016. Yet a win is a win, especially in the crowded 2020 field, and the only democratic socialist in this race now has what the New York Times has rightly called “that most prized and nebulous of assets: momentum.” Up next are the Nevada caucuses on February 22, where only a single percentage point separates Biden from Sanders. In South Carolina, which goes to the polls on February 29 and where Biden once led by a whopping 31 points, Sanders has narrowed the former vice president’s lead to 8 points in the latest Zogby Analytics poll.
Biden, though, is in freefall: an embarrassing fourth in Iowa, a humiliating fifth in New Hampshire. Back in December, I argued on CNN that mainstream media organizations were ignoring the possibility that Sanders could win three of the first four states. In fact, he could now end up winning all four of them.
No wonder Democratic Party elites are panicking. We hear the same tired arguments about Sanders lacking “electability.” These arguments conveniently ignore the fact that Sanders beats Trump in head-to-head polling; that the Vermont senator is the most popular member of the Senate; and that this self-proclaimed socialist has both the highest “net favorability rating” among Democratic voters as well as the most enthusiastic base.
Plus, the only way to test “electability” is through actual elections, and so far Sanders is two for two.
Iowa and New Hampshire, though, weren’t only victories for the senator from Vermont; they were also victories for Sanders’s signature issue, Medicare for All. Asked last week in an entrance poll how they felt about “replacing all private health insurance with a single government plan for everyone,” 57 percent of Iowa caucus-goers said they backed it, while only 38 percent were opposed.
In New Hampshire, on Tuesday, again almost six in 10 voters said they supported a Medicare for All system over the current private insurance system, according to an early exit poll.
Yet again, the pundits and prognosticators were wrong. “Iowa Democrats worry ‘Medicare for All’ hurts key industry,” read the headline in the Associated Press in December. “In Iowa, Single Payer ‘Medicare For All’ Loses Ground,” declared Forbes in August. “Medicare For All Isn’t That Popular — Even Among Democrats,” proclaimed FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver a month earlier.
“We’ve heard a lot about how Bernie Sanders is so ‘wildly out-of-touch’ with the Democratic electorate,” observed CNN contributor Kirsten Powers on Tuesday night. “Well, that’s not actually true.”
The message from Iowa and New Hampshire is clear. It was a big, big mistake to write off both Bernie Sanders and his No. 1 policy proposal. So going forward, will his critics make that same mistake again?


theintercept--2020-02-12--Mike Bloomberg Claims He Cut Stop-and-Frisk by 95 Percent — After Increasing It Sevenfold

Michael Bloomberg has been facing mounting online criticism over his mayoral record on stop-and-frisk , a tactic used by the New York Police Department in what critics — and eventually , a federal judge — said was a biased manner .
This week , a 5-year-old recording emerged of Bloomberg obliquely defending the program .
In response , the Bloomberg campaign released a misleading statement on Tuesday claiming that he simply inherited the policy and later reduced the practice .
“ I inherited the police practice of stop-and-frisk , and as part of our effort to stop gun violence it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a statement posted on his presidential campaign website .
“ By the time I left office , ” the statement continued , “ I cut it back by 95 % , but I should ’ ve done it faster and sooner .
I regret that and I have apologized — and I have taken responsibility for taking too long to understand the impact it had on Black and Latino communities.
” The statement drew immediate backlash over its twisting of history .
In 2001 , New York City maintained an aggressive program of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with an overwhelming focus on young African American and Latino men .
But , under the Bloomberg administration , the program vastly expanded , from around 97,296 stops in 2002 to a height of 685,724 in 2011 — a more than sevenfold increase during the former mayor ’ s tenure .
Far from changing course over the mayor ’ s focus on “ racial equity , ” as he has since claimed , the practice was clawed back by several lawsuits , which charged that the law enforcement program violated the basic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Judge Shira A. Scheindlin , in a scathing decision , noted that over the course of 2.3 million frisks , weapons were found only 1.5 percent of the time .
The decision pointed out that over half of the stops included African Americans and about third Latino , with less than 10 percent targeting white people .
The Bloomberg administration fought alongside New York ’ s notoriously aggressive police union to continue the program , arguing that the stop-and-frisk effort was focused on suspects with “ furtive movements , ” in “ high-crime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suspicious bulge.
” But the judge knocked down those assertions , noting that such claims are vague and subjective .
that circulated online this week , Bloomberg can be heard speaking at an Aspen Institute conference in 2015 defending the program ’ s racial slant as justifiable given the proportion of crime in African American and Latino communities .
“ You can just take the description , Xerox it , and pass it out to all the cops , ” said the billionaire former mayor .
“ They are male , minorities , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ true in New York ; that ’ s true in virtually every city.
” While data does reflect that violent crime tends to cluster in particular neighborhoods and among young men , the Bloomberg administration ’ s stop-and-frisk program went well beyond targeting based solely on objective evidence .
Expert testimony in federal court found that the New York Police Department carried out far more stop-and-frisks on African American and Latino residents even when controlling for precinct-level crime statistics and socioeconomic characteristics .
In other words , the evidence showed that minorities were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ degree of suspicion than white people .
The charge of racial bias was also backed up by multiple investigations and media scandals .
In one case , a low-level police officer recorded his superior instructing him on how to target residents for stop-and-frisk in a particular neighborhood .
“ I have no problem telling you this : male blacks , 14 to 20 , 21 , ” the officer said in the recording .
In another case , a young Harlem teenager surreptitiously recorded officers stopping and frisking him .
Asked why they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ For being a fucking mutt.
” What ’ s more , the true extent of the program may never be known .
Every time a New York police officer engages in stop-and-frisk , they are expected to fill out a form for the action to be recorded by the city .
Court monitors have noted that there is evidence that many stops go unrecorded or are improperly documented .
Current New York Mayor Bill de Blasio , who succeeded Bloomberg in 2014 , dramatically curtailed the police program , prompting backlash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the New York Police Department reported 11,008 stops , a small fraction of the amount of stops during the Bloomberg era .
Bloomberg has attempted to use his vast fortune to rebrand his image .
The Bloomberg Philanthropy has given grants to various civil rights groups and worked to build schools , libraries , and community centers in low-income and minority neighborhoods , a fact often cited during Bloomberg ’ s campaign for the Democratic Party ’ s presidential nomination .
The billionaire executive ’ s largesse , however , can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defending the racial bias in his approach to law enforcement .
The Aspen Institute comments in 2015 were among many instances in which he defended the program .
In 2013 , during a radio program , Bloomberg declared , “ I think we disproportionately stop whites too much and minorities too little .
It ’ s exactly the reverse of what they say .
”

Democratic presidential hopeful Michael Bloomberg has been facing mounting online criticism over his mayoral record on stop-and-frisk, a tactic used by the New York Police Department in what critics — and eventually, a federal judge — said was a biased manner. This week, a 5-year-old recording emerged of Bloomberg obliquely defending the program. In response, the Bloomberg campaign released a misleading statement on Tuesday claiming that he simply inherited the policy and later reduced the practice.
“I inherited the police practice of stop-and-frisk, and as part of our effort to stop gun violence it was overused,” he said in a statement posted on his presidential campaign website. “By the time I left office,” the statement continued, “I cut it back by 95%, but I should’ve done it faster and sooner. I regret that and I have apologized — and I have taken responsibility for taking too long to understand the impact it had on Black and Latino communities.”
The statement drew immediate backlash over its twisting of history. In 2001, New York City maintained an aggressive program of stopping and searching people throughout the city, with an overwhelming focus on young African American and Latino men. But, under the Bloomberg administration, the program vastly expanded, from around 97,296 stops in 2002 to a height of 685,724 in 2011 — a more than sevenfold increase during the former mayor’s tenure.
Share this far and wide. Unless the mainstream media picks it up, it will be isolated to twitter. pic.twitter.com/Fm0YCi4ZRy — Benjamin Dixon (@BenjaminPDixon) February 11, 2020
Far from changing course over the mayor’s focus on “racial equity,” as he has since claimed, the practice was clawed back by several lawsuits, which charged that the law enforcement program violated the basic constitutional rights of residents. U.S. District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, in a scathing decision, noted that over the course of 2.3 million frisks, weapons were found only 1.5 percent of the time. The decision pointed out that over half of the stops included African Americans and about third Latino, with less than 10 percent targeting white people.
The Bloomberg administration fought alongside New York’s notoriously aggressive police union to continue the program, arguing that the stop-and-frisk effort was focused on suspects with “furtive movements,” in “high-crime areas” and those with a “suspicious bulge.” But the judge knocked down those assertions, noting that such claims are vague and subjective.
In the comments that circulated online this week, Bloomberg can be heard speaking at an Aspen Institute conference in 2015 defending the program’s racial slant as justifiable given the proportion of crime in African American and Latino communities. “You can just take the description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all the cops,” said the billionaire former mayor. “They are male, minorities, 16 to 25. That’s true in New York; that’s true in virtually every city.”
While data does reflect that violent crime tends to cluster in particular neighborhoods and among young men, the Bloomberg administration’s stop-and-frisk program went well beyond targeting based solely on objective evidence. Expert testimony in federal court found that the New York Police Department carried out far more stop-and-frisks on African American and Latino residents even when controlling for precinct-level crime statistics and socioeconomic characteristics. In other words, the evidence showed that minorities were targeted for stops based on a lesser degree of suspicion than white people.
In 2019, the New York Police Department reported 11,008 stops, a small fraction of the amount of stops during the Bloomberg era.
The charge of racial bias was also backed up by multiple investigations and media scandals. In one case, a low-level police officer recorded his superior instructing him on how to target residents for stop-and-frisk in a particular neighborhood. “I have no problem telling you this: male blacks, 14 to 20, 21,” the officer said in the recording. In another case, a young Harlem teenager surreptitiously recorded officers stopping and frisking him. Asked why they had targeted him, the officer replied, “For being a fucking mutt.”
What’s more, the true extent of the program may never be known. Every time a New York police officer engages in stop-and-frisk, they are expected to fill out a form for the action to be recorded by the city. Court monitors have noted that there is evidence that many stops go unrecorded or are improperly documented. Current New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, who succeeded Bloomberg in 2014, dramatically curtailed the police program, prompting backlash from the police union. Last year, the New York Police Department reported 11,008 stops, a small fraction of the amount of stops during the Bloomberg era.
Bloomberg has attempted to use his vast fortune to rebrand his image. The Bloomberg Philanthropy has given grants to various civil rights groups and worked to build schools, libraries, and community centers in low-income and minority neighborhoods, a fact often cited during Bloomberg’s campaign for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination.
The billionaire executive’s largesse, however, can’t conceal Bloomberg’s own words defending the racial bias in his approach to law enforcement. The Aspen Institute comments in 2015 were among many instances in which he defended the program. In 2013, during a radio program, Bloomberg declared, “I think we disproportionately stop whites too much and minorities too little. It’s exactly the reverse of what they say.”