wearechange--2020-12-03--UN Says 233,000 Yemenis Dead After 6 Years of Saudi-US Coalition Bombing

A grim milestone in the “ forgotten war ” which has close US involvement : six years after the Saudi coalition began bombing Yemen to prevent a full Houthi rebel takeover of the country , the United Nations has issued an updated official tally of the death toll .
The UN now says an estimated 233,000 people have died as a result of the over half-decade long conflict .
Most of the deaths are believed to be from ‘ indirect causes ’ such as collapse of societal infrastructure , disease , and lack of food and resources .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths , including 131,000 from indirect causes such as lack of food , health services and infrastructure , ” the UN ’ s top humanitarian office said early this week .
This leaves a staggering over 100,000 direct combat deaths – likely most from aerial bombing .
Calling it an “ imminent catastrophe ” the UN office described that “ Yemen ’ s complex civil war began in earnest in 2015 , foisting disease , hunger and economic collapse on an already impoverished population .
In 2020 the violence escalated and the hardship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crisis , COVID-19 and desert locust infestations that are expected to cause damage and loss worth $ 222 million to staple crops , animals and livestock.
” “ Hostilities have directly caused tens of thousands of civilian casualties ; 3,153 child deaths and 5,660 children were verified in the first five years of the conflict , and 1,500 civilian casualties were reported in the first nine months of 2020 , ” it added of direct combat deaths in addition to indirect casualties .
The US-Saudi coalition had also for years imposed a full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ports , including the major Hodeidah , which is the country ’ s most important shipping port .
Humanitarian goods were also blocked for years .
When during the first half of the war in Syria casualties reached over 200,000 lives lost it drove international headlines and became a key talking point for those urging military intervention to oust Assad there .
However , given the US and UK are direct participants on executing the war in Yemen alongside the Saudis and the UAE ( including US and UK advanced weaponry being used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been glaringly absent from the talking points of the Western political class .

A grim milestone in the “forgotten war” which has close US involvement: six years after the Saudi coalition began bombing Yemen to prevent a full Houthi rebel takeover of the country, the United Nations has issued an updated official tally of the death toll.
The UN now says an estimated 233,000 people have died as a result of the over half-decade long conflict. Most of the deaths are believed to be from ‘indirect causes’ such as collapse of societal infrastructure, disease, and lack of food and resources.
“The war had already caused an estimated 233,000 deaths, including 131,000 from indirect causes such as lack of food, health services and infrastructure,” the UN’s top humanitarian office said early this week. This leaves a staggering over 100,000 direct combat deaths – likely most from aerial bombing.
Calling it an “imminent catastrophe” the UN office described that “Yemen’s complex civil war began in earnest in 2015, foisting disease, hunger and economic collapse on an already impoverished population. In 2020 the violence escalated and the hardship deepened with torrential rains, a fuel crisis, COVID-19 and desert locust infestations that are expected to cause damage and loss worth $222 million to staple crops, animals and livestock.”
“Hostilities have directly caused tens of thousands of civilian casualties; 3,153 child deaths and 5,660 children were verified in the first five years of the conflict, and 1,500 civilian casualties were reported in the first nine months of 2020,” it added of direct combat deaths in addition to indirect casualties.
The US-Saudi coalition had also for years imposed a full blockade on the country’s main ports, including the major Hodeidah, which is the country’s most important shipping port. Humanitarian goods were also blocked for years.
When during the first half of the war in Syria casualties reached over 200,000 lives lost it drove international headlines and became a key talking point for those urging military intervention to oust Assad there.
Why the hell is the US helping Saudi Arabia bomb Yemen? A brief guide. https://t.co/KVHaYEwiES — Vox (@voxdotcom) October 14, 2016
However, given the US and UK are direct participants on executing the war in Yemen alongside the Saudis and the UAE (including US and UK advanced weaponry being used), the tragedy of Yemen has been glaringly absent from the talking points of the Western political class.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-03--Luke Rudkowski Goes on Timcast IRL to Discuss Michael Flynn’s Call for Trump to Declare Martial Law

Luke Rudkowski went on Timcast IRL today to discuss Michael Flynn ’ s call for martial law as Trump calls @ @ @ @ @ the United States to declare him winner of the 2020 election .
OH YEAH , @ @ @ @ @ or government owned help us out here .
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT US ON

Luke Rudkowski went on Timcast IRL today to discuss Michael Flynn’s call for martial law as Trump calls on the Supreme Court of the United States to declare him winner of the 2020 election.
Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChange Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAop
Subscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1 Improve your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdY Filter your water: bit.ly/37QriDt Storable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com #1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK #1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3


wearechange--2020-12-03--BREAKING NEWS: Biden Administration Confirms Great Reset Coming Soon!

OH YEAH , since we are not corporate or government owned help us out here .
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT @ @

In today’s video, we cover Joe Biden’s climate czar John Kerry saying the Great Reset will happen at a greater speed and greater intensity
Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChange Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAop
Subscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1 Improve your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdY Filter your water: bit.ly/37QriDt Storable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com #1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK #1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3


wearechange--2020-12-04--“You Alone Can Save His Life”: Edward Snowden Urges Trump to Pardon Julian Assange

“ You alone can save his life , ” Snowden tweeted .
Assange , who exposed U.S. war crimes , has been jailed at Belmarsh Prison in London since April 2019 and faces possible extradition to the U.S .
Facing 17 alleged violations of the U.S .
Espionage Act and one for computer fraud , Assange could be hit with a sentence of up to 175 years .
His detention conditions and case have prompted international outrage from human rights and press freedom defenders .
Snowden ’ s appeal to Trump came a week after Stella Moris , Assange ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their two young sons and urged the U.S. president to grant Assange freedom .
“ I beg you , please bring him home for Christmas @ realDonaldTrump , ” Moris tweeted .
The plights of Assange and Snowden—who ’ s lived in Russia since his 2013 explosive leak of documents revealing the U.S. government ’ s massive surveillance operations—also drew attention this week from Rep. Tulsi Gabbard ( D-Hawii ) , who urged Trump to pardon both men .
In her tweet , Gabbard referenced Trump ’ s pardon the day earlier to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Since you ’ re giving pardons to people , please consider pardoning those who , at great personal sacrifice , exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state , ” she wrote .

National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden on Thursday urged President Donald Trump to pardon WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
“You alone can save his life,” Snowden tweeted.
Mr. President, if you grant only one act of clemency during your time in office, please: free Julian Assange. You alone can save his life. @realDonaldTrump — Edward Snowden (@Snowden) December 3, 2020
Assange, who exposed U.S. war crimes, has been jailed at Belmarsh Prison in London since April 2019 and faces possible extradition to the U.S. Facing 17 alleged violations of the U.S. Espionage Act and one for computer fraud, Assange could be hit with a sentence of up to 175 years.
His detention conditions and case have prompted international outrage from human rights and press freedom defenders.
Snowden’s appeal to Trump came a week after Stella Moris, Assange’s partner, tweeted an image of their two young sons and urged the U.S. president to grant Assange freedom.
“I beg you, please bring him home for Christmas @realDonaldTrump,” Moris tweeted.
The plights of Assange and Snowden—who’s lived in Russia since his 2013 explosive leak of documents revealing the U.S. government’s massive surveillance operations—also drew attention this week from Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawii), who urged Trump to pardon both men.
In her tweet, Gabbard referenced Trump’s pardon the day earlier to his former adviser Michael Flynn.
“Since you’re giving pardons to people, please consider pardoning those who, at great personal sacrifice, exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state,” she wrote.
Republished from CommonDreams.org under Creative Commons


wearechange--2020-12-04--Bill Clinton “Couldn’t Stay Away” From Epstein & Visited Pedo Island in 2003, According to His Forme

Bill Clinton “Couldn’t Stay Away” From Epstein & Visited Pedo Island in 2003, According to His Former Top Aide

Bill Clinton ’ s former top aide and Chelsea Clinton nemesis Doug Band has told Vanity Fair that former President Bill Clinton did visit Jeffrey Epstein ’ s infamous “ pedo island ” in January 2003 , and that he was unable to push Epstein out of Clinton ’ s orbit since they flew to Africa together in 2002 aboard the the pedophile ’ s ( Epstein ’ s ) private 727 , dubbed the “ Lolita Express.
” Band said he had no idea about Epstein ’ s sex crimes back then but got enough bad vibes that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But Clinton continued to socialize with Epstein and take his money .
In 2006 Epstein donated $ 25,000 to the Clinton Foundation .
Clinton made more than two dozen trips on Epstein ’ s jet around this time , Epstein ’ s flight logs show .
In January 2003 , according to Band , Clinton visited Epstein ’ s private Caribbean island , Little St. James .
Band said it was one of the few trips he declined to go on in his time with Clinton .
–Vanity Fair Band – who revealed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ activity and accused Chelsea Clinton of tapping Foundation funds to pay for her wedding ( known only because of WikiLeaks ) – also says Chelsea Clinton had a relationship with Epstein and his alleged co-conspirator in an underage sex trafficking ring , Ghislaine Maxwell .
Chelsea had ties to Epstein and Maxwell , Band said ; he showed me a photo of Bill and Chelsea posing with Epstein and Maxwell at the King of Morocco ’ s wedding .
Chelsea remained friends with Maxwell for years after the press revealed Maxwell was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For instance , Chelsea invited Maxwell to her 2010 wedding at the Brooke Astor estate in Rhinebeck , New York , after Epstein had pleaded guilty in Florida to procuring sex from a minor .
–Vanity Fair “ Ghislaine had access to yachts and nice homes .
Chelsea needed that , ” said Band .
Band notably created the now-defunct Clinton Global Initiative , which has helped to raise $ 74 billion for Clinton global charities , according to Newsmax .
Thanks again to WikiLeaks , we also know that Band was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and investment firm , Teneo in an sordid example of “ pay for play ” which most of the mainstream media refused to cover – which he worried about in an email to John Podesta , saying : “ If this story gets out , we are screwed.
” In response to Band ’ s claims about Chelsea , a family spokesperson said that “ Chelsea was on friendly terms with Maxwell because of a mutual friend ( Gateway computer founder Ted Waitt ) and only took one yacht trip with Maxwell in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until 2015 that Chelsea became aware of the horrific allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell and she hopes that all the victims find justice.
” In 2011 , Band says he instructed Bill Clinton ’ s staffers to ban Maxwell ‘ from all Clintonworld events ’ to try and drive a wedge between Chelsea and Ghislaine .
“ I knew in telling everyone to stop including Ghislaine that Chelsea and her father would be very angry .
It made it harder for them to justify being close to her , ” said Band .

Bill Clinton’s former top aide and Chelsea Clinton nemesis Doug Band has told Vanity Fair that former President Bill Clinton did visit Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “pedo island” in January 2003, and that he was unable to push Epstein out of Clinton’s orbit since they flew to Africa together in 2002 aboard the the pedophile’s (Epstein’s) private 727, dubbed the “Lolita Express.”
Band said he had no idea about Epstein’s sex crimes back then but got enough bad vibes that he advised Clinton to end the relationship. But Clinton continued to socialize with Epstein and take his money . In 2006 Epstein donated $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Clinton made more than two dozen trips on Epstein’s jet around this time, Epstein’s flight logs show. In January 2003, according to Band, Clinton visited Epstein’s private Caribbean island, Little St. James. Band said it was one of the few trips he declined to go on in his time with Clinton. –Vanity Fair
Band – who revealed the Clinton Foundation’s ‘for-profit’ activity and accused Chelsea Clinton of tapping Foundation funds to pay for her wedding (known only because of WikiLeaks) – also says Chelsea Clinton had a relationship with Epstein and his alleged co-conspirator in an underage sex trafficking ring, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Chelsea had ties to Epstein and Maxwell, Band said; he showed me a photo of Bill and Chelsea posing with Epstein and Maxwell at the King of Morocco’s wedding. Chelsea remained friends with Maxwell for years after the press revealed Maxwell was a close associate of Epstein’s. For instance, Chelsea invited Maxwell to her 2010 wedding at the Brooke Astor estate in Rhinebeck, New York, after Epstein had pleaded guilty in Florida to procuring sex from a minor. –Vanity Fair
“Ghislaine had access to yachts and nice homes. Chelsea needed that,” said Band.
Band notably created the now-defunct Clinton Global Initiative, which has helped to raise $74 billion for Clinton global charities, according to Newsmax. Thanks again to WikiLeaks, we also know that Band was soliciting donations for Clinton through his PR and investment firm, Teneo in an sordid example of “pay for play” which most of the mainstream media refused to cover – which he worried about in an email to John Podesta, saying: “If this story gets out, we are screwed.”
In response to Band’s claims about Chelsea, a family spokesperson said that “Chelsea was on friendly terms with Maxwell because of a mutual friend (Gateway computer founder Ted Waitt) and only took one yacht trip with Maxwell in 2009: “It wasn’t until 2015 that Chelsea became aware of the horrific allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell and she hopes that all the victims find justice.”
16) It's no secret that the Clintons were/are good friends with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Here's Ghislaine at Chelsea Clinton's wedding. pic.twitter.com/XjUXN1hLWs — Greg (@greg_scott84) July 14, 2020
In 2011, Band says he instructed Bill Clinton’s staffers to ban Maxwell ‘from all Clintonworld events’ to try and drive a wedge between Chelsea and Ghislaine.
“I knew in telling everyone to stop including Ghislaine that Chelsea and her father would be very angry. It made it harder for them to justify being close to her,” said Band.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-04--In Bizarre Interview, Biden Says He’d Fake an Illness and Resign Over Disagreement With Kamala Harri

In Bizarre Interview, Biden Says He’d Fake an Illness and Resign Over Disagreement With Kamala Harris

Joe Biden may have just said the quiet part out loud .
During a Thursday CNN interview with Kamala Harris , Biden was asked about his relationship with his running mate , to which he gave a rambling reply capped off with the most awkward of ‘ jokes ’ : that under certain circumstances he ’ d fake an illness and resign .
“ It ’ s a matter of , the thing – we are simpatico on our philosophy of government .
Sympatico on how we want to approach these issues that we ’ re facing .
And when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just like so far , it ’ s been just like when Barack and I did .
It ’ s in private , she ’ ll say ‘ I think you should do A , B , C or D , ’ and I ’ ll say ‘ I like A , I don ’ t like B and C , and s ’ go OK… ’ “ And like I told Barack , if there ’ s a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle , I ’ ll develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resign.
” Biden then goes on to gush over Kamala ’ s credentials – saying “ The great thing is she has a background in the Senate on intelligence , the intelligence community , she has a background in the Senate on a whole range of things that are gon na be pertinent to what we have to do.
” “ It ’ s a matter of who takes what , when.
” Is this the type of thing Biden would fake ?
As a reminder , Both Biden and Harris referred to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the campaign trail .

Joe Biden may have just said the quiet part out loud.
During a Thursday CNN interview with Kamala Harris, Biden was asked about his relationship with his running mate, to which he gave a rambling reply capped off with the most awkward of ‘jokes’: that under certain circumstances he’d fake an illness and resign.
“It’s a matter of, the thing – we are simpatico on our philosophy of government. Sympatico on how we want to approach these issues that we’re facing. And when we disagree, it’ll be just like so far, it’s been just like when Barack and I did. It’s in private, she’ll say ‘I think you should do A, B, C or D,’ and I’ll say ‘I like A, I don’t like B and C, and s’go OK…’
“And like I told Barack, if there’s a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I’ll develop some disease and say I have to resign.”
Biden then goes on to gush over Kamala’s credentials – saying “The great thing is she has a background in the Senate on intelligence, the intelligence community, she has a background in the Senate on a whole range of things that are gonna be pertinent to what we have to do.”
“It’s a matter of who takes what, when.”
Joe Biden is asked about his disagreements with Kamala Harris on certain issues: "Like I told Barack, if I reach something where there's a fundamental disagreement we have based on a moral principle, I'll develop some disease and say I have to resign." pic.twitter.com/SLcvrwaPCA — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 4, 2020
Is this the type of thing Biden would fake?
Biden explains his foot injury: "I’m walking through this little alleyway to get to the bedroom and I grabbed the ball like this and he ran and I was joking running after him to grab his tail. And what happened was he slipped on a throw rug and I tripped on the rug he slid on" pic.twitter.com/o9ARgpJpfD — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 4, 2020
As a reminder, Both Biden and Harris referred to a ‘Harris administration‘ while on the campaign trail.
Kamala Harris lets the truth slip: "a Harris Administration together with Joe Biden" pic.twitter.com/kX2wbDWwgm — Eric Trump (@EricTrump) September 15, 2020
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-05--Luke Rudkowski Goes Back on Timcast IRL to Discuss New Video Evidence of Vote Fraud

Luke Rudkowski went back on Timcast IRL today to discuss the new video evidence of alleged vote fraud that has emerged.
Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChange Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAop
Subscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1 Improve your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdY Filter your water: bit.ly/37QriDt Storable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com #1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK #1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3


wearechange--2020-12-05--Tested Positive?? Be Sure to Ask This Question!

The lockdowns are based on surging “ cases ” which are based on positive PCR test results .
However , what exactly is a positive PCR test result ?
What does it mean ?
As Dr. Tommy Megremis summarized recently : If you are generally aware , the PCR test is used to amplify small amount of genetic material so as to recognize patterns of DNA by “ cycling.
” ( Also , for RNA virus , the RNA is converted to DNA in order to be detected , it ’ s just the way the test works ) This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recognize the genomes in Egyptian mummies and Wooly Mammoths .
It works because if you amplify and cycle enough times to “ grow ” legitimate DNA fragments , you get something with with a fair amount of specificity .
What is becoming more and more apparent is that the PCR test was not designed as a diagnostic tool for infection , and really can not function as one without having a huge amount of false positives , period .
When it comes to COVID , the presence of viral particles picked up by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not been quantitatively linked to an active “ symptomatic ” infection .
It simply can not be so , because infection threshold as a result of viral load is different for each patient .
It turns out , if you “ cycle ” over around 25 times , the false positivity of COVID infection starts getting very high .
I and others have explained in blogs how people can be exposed to virus , and mount a simple innate immune response and never know any differently .
When you test these people with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not sick , you can find the viral RNA code that is used to “ diagnose ” if you cycle enough times .
The last I read , Labcorp cycles at least 40 times to detect viral genome fragments .
The PCR test was never intended for diagnosis of infection but as a qualitative test for presence of parts of a virus genome .
I know there has been some confusion circulating the net about what the inventor Kary Mullis had said about that .
But we walk daily with people who have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or bacterial genomes which one could pick up with a PCR test if one had the specific test for it .
Would we claim that that individual was an infected patient ?
No !
So given all that , PeakProsperity ’ s Chris Martenson explains below , in great details , the answer to the most important question you should ask if you or a loved one gets a positive PCR test result .
Sounds wonky but it ’ s actually really important to understand .
A low CT value means someone is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , oppositely , means less of a viral load .
Beyond a certain level the load is insufficient to either infect someone else or be of any clinical or epidemiological relevance whatsoever .
The problem ?
Governments all over the country and world are basing their decisions on CT values that are very high .
Too high .

The lockdowns are based on surging “cases” which are based on positive PCR test results.
However, what exactly is a positive PCR test result? What does it mean? As Dr. Tommy Megremis summarized recently:
If you are generally aware, the PCR test is used to amplify small amount of genetic material so as to recognize patterns of DNA by “cycling.” (Also, for RNA virus, the RNA is converted to DNA in order to be detected, it’s just the way the test works) This is how we have been able to recognize the genomes in Egyptian mummies and Wooly Mammoths. It works because if you amplify and cycle enough times to “grow” legitimate DNA fragments, you get something with with a fair amount of specificity. What is becoming more and more apparent is that the PCR test was not designed as a diagnostic tool for infection, and really cannot function as one without having a huge amount of false positives, period. When it comes to COVID, the presence of viral particles picked up by the PCR technique does not and has not been quantitatively linked to an active “symptomatic” infection. It simply cannot be so, because infection threshold as a result of viral load is different for each patient. It turns out, if you “cycle” over around 25 times, the false positivity of COVID infection starts getting very high. I and others have explained in blogs how people can be exposed to virus, and mount a simple innate immune response and never know any differently. When you test these people with very low viral loads, who are not sick, you can find the viral RNA code that is used to “diagnose” if you cycle enough times. The last I read, Labcorp cycles at least 40 times to detect viral genome fragments. The PCR test was never intended for diagnosis of infection but as a qualitative test for presence of parts of a virus genome. I know there has been some confusion circulating the net about what the inventor Kary Mullis had said about that. But we walk daily with people who have any number of parts of killer virus or bacterial genomes which one could pick up with a PCR test if one had the specific test for it. Would we claim that that individual was an infected patient? No!
So given all that, PeakProsperity’s Chris Martenson explains below, in great details, the answer to the most important question you should ask if you or a loved one gets a positive PCR test result.
“What’s the Cycle Threshold (CT) value for that test?”
Sounds wonky but it’s actually really important to understand. A low CT value means someone is loaded with virus. A high value, oppositely, means less of a viral load.
Beyond a certain level the load is insufficient to either infect someone else or be of any clinical or epidemiological relevance whatsoever.
The problem? Governments all over the country and world are basing their decisions on CT values that are very high. Too high.
* * *
Links:
WHO PCR 47 (!) Cycles
https://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/eul_0489_185_00_path_covid19_ce_ivd_ifu_issue_2.0.pdf?ua=1
CT over 35 is non-infectious
https://www.infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com/home/topics/covid19/ct-value-may-inform-when-patients-with-covid-19-can-be-safely-discharged/
Cycle Thresholds Too Damn High
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Corman Drosten retraction request
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
Bad Testing Video Sept 1
https://youtu.be/ZFNdsRHKUM4
UK PCR positive standards
https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/guidance-and-sop-covid-19-virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories-v1.pdf
Kansas CT cutoff of 42
https://www.coronavirus.kdheks.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1505/SARS-CoV-2-COVID-19-PCR-Ct-Cutoff-Values-PDF—10-5-20
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-06--L.A. Bar Owner Furious After City Lets Hollywood Studio Set Up Dining Tents Across From Her Closed B

L.A. Bar Owner Furious After City Lets Hollywood Studio Set Up Dining Tents Across From Her Closed Bar

A viral video is making the rounds which perfectly captures the anger , frustration and contempt people have for our elected officials , who flagrantly break their own COVID-19 rules when it suits them – and , as you ’ ll see , grant well-connected ‘ elites ’ privileges as regular Americans continue to be devastated by what seems like a two-tiered set of lockdown restrictions .
In this latest example , the owner of the Pineapple Hill Grill & Saloon in Sherman Oaks , Angela M , offers heartbreaking commentary as she walks through her parking lot – revealing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been shut down due to heightened pandemic restrictions , a movie studio was granted permission to set up outdoor dining tents for a production .
“ I walk into my parking lot , and obviously Mayor Garcetti has approved – this being set up for a movie company , ” says Angela – who came to work to gather materials for a lockdown protest she ’ s organizing .
“ I ’ m losing everything , ” she adds .
“ Everything I own is being taken away from me .
And they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to my outdoor patio.
” People wonder why I am protesting and I have had enough .
They have not given us money and they ’ ve shut us down .
We can not survive .
The staff can not survive .
Look at this , ” she says – gesturing to her patio .
“ Tell me that this is dangerous , but right next to me is a slap in my face.
” “ This is dangerous… We need your help .
We need someone to do something about this , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restaurant is sponsoring a Saturday protest in front of LA County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl ’ s house in Santa Monica .

A viral video is making the rounds which perfectly captures the anger, frustration and contempt people have for our elected officials, who flagrantly break their own COVID-19 rules when it suits them – and, as you’ll see, grant well-connected ‘elites’ privileges as regular Americans continue to be devastated by what seems like a two-tiered set of lockdown restrictions.
In this latest example, the owner of the Pineapple Hill Grill & Saloon in Sherman Oaks, Angela M, offers heartbreaking commentary as she walks through her parking lot – revealing that while her own outdoor dining has been shut down due to heightened pandemic restrictions, a movie studio was granted permission to set up outdoor dining tents for a production.
“I walk into my parking lot, and obviously Mayor Garcetti has approved – this being set up for a movie company,” says Angela – who came to work to gather materials for a lockdown protest she’s organizing.
“I’m losing everything,” she adds. “Everything I own is being taken away from me. And they set up a movie company right next to my outdoor patio.”
People wonder why I am protesting and I have had enough. They have not given us money and they’ve shut us down. We cannot survive. The staff cannot survive. Look at this,” she says – gesturing to her patio. “Tell me that this is dangerous, but right next to me is a slap in my face.”
“This is dangerous… We need your help. We need someone to do something about this,” she says in closing.
Watch:
Bar owner in Los Angeles CA is livid to see that mayor Garcetti has approved an outdoor dining area for a movie company directly across from her outdoor dining area (which was shut down) pic.twitter.com/jkUP2CWg35 — Jake Coco ????? (@jakecoco) December 4, 2020
The restaurant is sponsoring a Saturday protest in front of LA County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl’s house in Santa Monica.
From the owners page pic.twitter.com/gp4hGijVry — Jake Coco ????? (@jakecoco) December 5, 2020
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-07--‘No Vaccine, No Work’: Employers Discuss Making Immunity Mandatory for Workers

Public opinion polls from the past couple of weeks appear to show a growing number of Americans are planning to get the coronavirus vaccine , even as Dr. Fauci hinted that the UK ’ s decision to grant emergency approval to Pfizer ’ s mRNA vaccine might have been somewhat “ rushed ” .
A recent Goldman research note intended for its institutional clients showed as much , citing polling numbers from YouGov .
With hospitalizations surging to record levels and California once again heading into lockdown , millions of Americans would probably gladly take the vaccine just to feel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over ” , even though the duration of that immunity is still not very well understood , and some “ conspiracy-minded ” skeptics have raised question about the headline efficacy numbers .
But as the US and UK prepare to start delivering the first jabs in a week , industries are jockeying to try and get their workers designated as “ essential ” so they can have faster access to the vaccine ( for many , profits are ultimately on the line ) .
Even though many Americans believe it ’ s morally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take a vaccine , some companies and industry groups are planning to require workers to be vaccinated as a precondition for returning to work .
Maybe they think taking such a public stand might help them secure supplies for their vaccines more quickly .
Whatever the reason , even for white collar workers who have been comfortably ensconced in their homes/apartments for the last nine months , the subtext is pretty clear : Here ’ s more from the Hill : Companies will soon face a tough decision about whether to require their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a condition for returning to work .
Employers believe they are on firm legal ground to mandate vaccinations , but that doesn ’ t mean enforcement won ’ t be without its challenges , particularly given the backlash in some parts of the country to mask mandates and smaller groups opposed to vaccinations of any kind .
However , many corporations might soon find that their workers ( not just blue-collar manufacturing workers , but white-collar office drones , too ) either don ’ t share their concerns , can ’ t get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply skeptical of the long-term side effects and would prefer to simply wait and see .
Fortunately for these workers , US law offers a way to push back .
Companies can require it , yes , but they may bump up against legal limits .
COVID is such uncharted territory that as we see employers acting , as we see others acting , more edges in the law are being articulated , ” said Allison Hoffman , University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School professor .
Some business groups are starting to get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voicing public support for vaccination requirements .
Jay Timmons , CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers , stressed that the vaccine is needed to protect essential personnel , including manufacturing workers , and that his group would back member companies implementing vaccination requirements .
“ While there are likely legal concerns with blanket mandates , if any of our members believed that a requirement at their company was the right thing to do , we would certainly support that within the bounds of the law .
Because America ’ s future depends @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a new way , ” Timmons told The Hill .
The legal limits that employers could run up against are related to the American Disabilities Act ( ADA ) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , which allow for employee vaccination exemptions under certain health and religious reasons .
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) in March said an employer covered by the ADA and Title VII can ’ t compel all of its employees to take a vaccine .
“ The Commission continues to closely monitor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is actively evaluating how a potential vaccine would interact with employers ’ obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act , Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , and the other laws the Commission enforces , ” Christina Saah Nazer , an EEOC spokeswoman , told The Hill .
Last week , Joe Biden – who vowed during the debates to make masks mandatory nationwide – switched it up and said he wouldn ’ t make vaccines mandatory for every , just like he wouldn ’ t “ demand ” vaccinations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Boris Johnson has pledged not to mandate vaccinations , and other world leaders have as well .
But let ’ s back up for a second : some kind of federal edict mandating vaccinations isn ’ t the only method for coercing the entire population to accept them .
Oftentimes , political leaders – for whatever their reasons – will opt instead for a more subtle approach .
If those who refuse to get the vaccine can ’ t work , can ’ t shop and are effectively excluded from society , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are really “ voluntary ” ?
And what does this mean for workers who simply find themselves shut out as the rich and connected shove their way to the front of the line ?

Public opinion polls from the past couple of weeks appear to show a growing number of Americans are planning to get the coronavirus vaccine, even as Dr. Fauci hinted that the UK’s decision to grant emergency approval to Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine might have been somewhat “rushed”.
A recent Goldman research note intended for its institutional clients showed as much, citing polling numbers from YouGov.
With hospitalizations surging to record levels and California once again heading into lockdown, millions of Americans would probably gladly take the vaccine just to feel a sense that the pandemic is “over”, even though the duration of that immunity is still not very well understood, and some “conspiracy-minded” skeptics have raised question about the headline efficacy numbers.
But as the US and UK prepare to start delivering the first jabs in a week, industries are jockeying to try and get their workers designated as “essential” so they can have faster access to the vaccine (for many, profits are ultimately on the line).
Even though many Americans believe it’s morally reprehensible to fire someone for refusing to take a vaccine, some companies and industry groups are planning to require workers to be vaccinated as a precondition for returning to work. Maybe they think taking such a public stand might help them secure supplies for their vaccines more quickly.
Whatever the reason, even for white collar workers who have been comfortably ensconced in their homes/apartments for the last nine months, the subtext is pretty clear: no vaccine, no work.
Here’s more from the Hill:
Companies will soon face a tough decision about whether to require their employees to get vaccinated for COVID-19 as a condition for returning to work. […] Employers believe they are on firm legal ground to mandate vaccinations, but that doesn’t mean enforcement won’t be without its challenges, particularly given the backlash in some parts of the country to mask mandates and smaller groups opposed to vaccinations of any kind.
However, many corporations might soon find that their workers (not just blue-collar manufacturing workers, but white-collar office drones, too) either don’t share their concerns, can’t get their hands on a vaccine or are simply skeptical of the long-term side effects and would prefer to simply wait and see.
Fortunately for these workers, US law offers a way to push back.
Companies can require it, yes, but they may bump up against legal limits. COVID is such uncharted territory that as we see employers acting, as we see others acting, more edges in the law are being articulated,” said Allison Hoffman, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School professor. Some business groups are starting to get out in front of the issue by voicing public support for vaccination requirements. Jay Timmons, CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers, stressed that the vaccine is needed to protect essential personnel, including manufacturing workers, and that his group would back member companies implementing vaccination requirements. “While there are likely legal concerns with blanket mandates, if any of our members believed that a requirement at their company was the right thing to do, we would certainly support that within the bounds of the law. Because America’s future depends on folks rolling up our sleeves in a new way,” Timmons told The Hill. The legal limits that employers could run up against are related to the American Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which allow for employee vaccination exemptions under certain health and religious reasons. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in March said an employer covered by the ADA and Title VII can’t compel all of its employees to take a vaccine. “The Commission continues to closely monitor the developments of a COVID-19 vaccine and is actively evaluating how a potential vaccine would interact with employers’ obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the other laws the Commission enforces,” Christina Saah Nazer, an EEOC spokeswoman, told The Hill.
Last week, Joe Biden – who vowed during the debates to make masks mandatory nationwide – switched it up and said he wouldn’t make vaccines mandatory for every, just like he wouldn’t “demand” vaccinations be made mandatory. The UK’s Boris Johnson has pledged not to mandate vaccinations, and other world leaders have as well.
But let’s back up for a second: some kind of federal edict mandating vaccinations isn’t the only method for coercing the entire population to accept them. Oftentimes, political leaders – for whatever their reasons – will opt instead for a more subtle approach.
If those who refuse to get the vaccine can’t work, can’t shop and are effectively excluded from society, then can we honestly say that vaccinations are really “voluntary”?
And what does this mean for workers who simply find themselves shut out as the rich and connected shove their way to the front of the line?
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-06--Florida Will Now Require Disclosure of PCR ‘Cycle Threshold’ Data in Tests

We have detailed the controversy surrounding America ’ s COVID “ casedemic ” and the misleading results of the PCR test and its amplification procedure in great detail over the past few months .
As a reminder , “ cycle thresholds ” ( Ct ) are the level at which widely used polymerase chain reaction ( PCR ) test can detect a sample of the COVID-19 virus .
The higher the number of cycles , the lower the amount of viral load in the sample ; the lower the cycles , the more prevalent the virus was in the original @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that cycle thresholds are an important metric by which patients , the public , and policymakers can make more informed decisions about how infectious and/or sick an individual with a positive COVID-19 test might be .
However , as JustTheNews reports , health departments across the country are failing to collect that data .
Here are a few headlines from those experts and scientific studies : So , in summary , with regard to our current “ casedemic ” , positive tests as they are counted today do not indicate a “ case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viral RNA was found in a nasal swab .
It may be enough to make you sick , but according to the New York Times and their experts , probably won ’ t .
And certainly not sufficient replication of the virus to make anyone else sick .
But you will be sent home for ten days anyway , even if you never have a sniffle .
And this is the number the media breathlessly reports… and is used to fearmonger mask mandates and lockdowns nationwide… All of which is background for an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Health ( and signed off on by Florida ’ s Republican Governor Ron deSantis ) .
For the first time in the history of the pandemic , a state will require that all labs in the state report the critical “ cycle threshold ” level of every COVID-19 test they perform .
So , why is Florida doing this ?
There appears to be three options : 1 ) Pro-Trump – Florida is attempting to pre-empt the Biden Team ’ s plan to slash the Ct used by labs for COVID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ false positives and show “ cases ” plunge “ thanks to Biden ’ s mask/lockdown/vaccine-confidence ” rules .
2 ) Pro-Biden – Florida is beginning the ‘ fake rescue ’ plan outlined here ( and above ) 3 ) Pro-Science – Florida is the first state to actually pay attention to the real ‘ science ’ of PCR tests .
We hope , for the sake of Americans ’ livelihoods it is Option 3 and the ‘ casedemic ’ will collapse on itself and allow we , the people to go back to @ @ @ @ @

We have detailed the controversy surrounding America’s COVID “casedemic” and the misleading results of the PCR test and its amplification procedure in great detail over the past few months.
As a reminder, “cycle thresholds” (Ct) are the level at which widely used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test can detect a sample of the COVID-19 virus. The higher the number of cycles, the lower the amount of viral load in the sample; the lower the cycles, the more prevalent the virus was in the original sample.
Numerous epidemiological experts have argued that cycle thresholds are an important metric by which patients, the public, and policymakers can make more informed decisions about how infectious and/or sick an individual with a positive COVID-19 test might be. However, as JustTheNews reports, health departments across the country are failing to collect that data.
Here are a few headlines from those experts and scientific studies:
So, in summary, with regard to our current “casedemic”, positive tests as they are counted today do not indicate a “case” of anything. They indicate that viral RNA was found in a nasal swab. It may be enough to make you sick, but according to the New York Times and their experts, probably won’t. And certainly not sufficient replication of the virus to make anyone else sick. But you will be sent home for ten days anyway, even if you never have a sniffle. And this is the number the media breathlessly reports… and is used to fearmonger mask mandates and lockdowns nationwide…
I’m very sorry for your loss. Sadly, a mask mandate has not stopped the spread in many states or countries. I wish masks were the answer. But they truly are just a feel good policy. I wish the data said differently. pic.twitter.com/iMucfz344n — secret name (@noyb23456) December 6, 2020
All of which is background for an intriguing decision made by Florida’s Department of Health (and signed off on by Florida’s Republican Governor Ron deSantis).
For the first time in the history of the pandemic, a state will require that all labs in the state report the critical “cycle threshold” level of every COVID-19 test they perform .
All positive, negative and indeterminate COVID-19 laboratory results must be reported to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately. This includes all COVID-19 test types – polymerase chain reaction (PCR), other RNA, antigen and antibody results. Cycle threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges , as applicable, must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately.
Full press release below:
So, why is Florida doing this? There appears to be three options:
1) Pro-Trump – Florida is attempting to pre-empt the Biden Team’s plan to slash the Ct used by labs for COVID “case” which will eliminate the false positives and show “cases” plunge “thanks to Biden’s mask/lockdown/vaccine-confidence” rules. 2) Pro-Biden – Florida is beginning the ‘fake rescue’ plan outlined here (and above) 3) Pro-Science – Florida is the first state to actually pay attention to the real ‘science’ of PCR tests.
We hope, for the sake of Americans’ livelihoods it is Option 3 and the ‘casedemic’ will collapse on itself and allow we, the people to go back to some sense of normality.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-07--82% of Americans Say They Couldn’t Afford $500 Emergency Thanks to Pandemic

A recent survey of 2,000 Americans carried out by “ innovation consultancy ” Highland took a close look at how personal finances and spending habits have changed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic , which crushed the US economy and has triggered a protracted downturn around the world .
With the US labor market adding just 245K new jobs last month , a sign that the sharp rebound from the chaos of March has already run its course , and millions of Americans waiting on more stimulus from Washington , the share of people living check to check has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a staggering percentage of Americans didn ’ t have enough cash on hand for an unexpected hardship of $ 400 .
But what ’ s even worse for America ’ s consumption-driven economy is that a solid majority of Americans have reduced spending , some dramatically , as pandemic has made socialization difficult .
According to the survey , 63 % have cut back on spending since the start of the pandemic .
Asked for their reasons , respondents cited the need to be more cautious with their finances ( 60 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ income ( 49 % ) , and staying home more often ( 40 % ) .
For those who have cut back , 64 % say they are spending less on dining out or takeout , 61 % have reduced spending on entertainment such as concerts or movies , while 55 % are buying less apparel and 52 % are spending less on travel .
It is interesting to note that 21 % of respondents say they have been spending more since the pandemic .
Of those respondents , 51 % say they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 50 % are buying more household supplies .
After the unemployment rate spiked to more than 14 % in April , Americans continue to be wary about their job security and income .
According to respondents , more than a quarter feel they do not currently have a stable income , and 63 % say they have been living paycheck to paycheck since the pandemic .
Millennials appear to be the hardest hit demographic as 64 % say they are living paycheck to paycheck .
Moreover , 25 % of respondents feel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stable income .
27 % of respondents also said they ’ ve taken on more than $ 10K in debt .
But perhaps the most alarming number from the entire survey : a whopping 82 % of respondents said they wouldn ’ t be able to cover an emergency $ 500 expense without borrowing money .
For context , prior to the pandemic , surveys showed that roughly half of Americans couldn ’ t afford a $ 500 emergency expense , which means the number of people who say they couldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 60 % .
Nearly half added that they now regret living beyond their means for so long before the crisis .
But the market ’ s at record highs , so at least those who have the option can borrow against their 401 ( k ) s for a little emergency cash ( that is , if they have a 401 ( k ) ) .

A recent survey of 2,000 Americans carried out by “innovation consultancy” Highland took a close look at how personal finances and spending habits have changed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, which crushed the US economy and has triggered a protracted downturn around the world.
With the US labor market adding just 245K new jobs last month, a sign that the sharp rebound from the chaos of March has already run its course, and millions of Americans waiting on more stimulus from Washington, the share of people living check to check has expanded rapidly.
Even before the pandemic, a staggering percentage of Americans didn’t have enough cash on hand for an unexpected hardship of $400. But what’s even worse for America’s consumption-driven economy is that a solid majority of Americans have reduced spending, some dramatically, as pandemic has made socialization difficult. According to the survey, 63% have cut back on spending since the start of the pandemic.
Asked for their reasons, respondents cited the need to be more cautious with their finances (60%), experiencing a reduced salary or income (49%), and staying home more often (40%).
For those who have cut back, 64% say they are spending less on dining out or takeout, 61% have reduced spending on entertainment such as concerts or movies, while 55% are buying less apparel and 52% are spending less on travel.
It is interesting to note that 21% of respondents say they have been spending more since the pandemic. Of those respondents, 51% say they are buying more food or groceries, and 50% are buying more household supplies.
After the unemployment rate spiked to more than 14% in April, Americans continue to be wary about their job security and income. According to respondents, more than a quarter feel they do not currently have a stable income, and 63% say they have been living paycheck to paycheck since the pandemic. Millennials appear to be the hardest hit demographic as 64% say they are living paycheck to paycheck.
Moreover, 25% of respondents feel they don’t currently have a stable income.
27% of respondents also said they’ve taken on more than $10K in debt.
But perhaps the most alarming number from the entire survey: a whopping 82% of respondents said they wouldn’t be able to cover an emergency $500 expense without borrowing money.
For context, prior to the pandemic, surveys showed that roughly half of Americans couldn’t afford a $500 emergency expense, which means the number of people who say they couldn’t cover a small emergency has risen by 60%.
Nearly half added that they now regret living beyond their means for so long before the crisis.
But the market’s at record highs, so at least those who have the option can borrow against their 401(k)s for a little emergency cash (that is, if they have a 401(k)).
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-07--WHAT??? US And UFOs Have Secret Deal, Trump On Verge Of Revealing?

In today ’ s video , we cover bombshell claims from the former director of the Israeli space program about @ @ @ @ @ why humanity is not being made aware .
OH YEAH , since we are not @ @ @ @ @ us out here .
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT US ON

In today’s video, we cover bombshell claims from the former director of the Israeli space program about the existence of UFOs and why humanity is not being made aware.
Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChange Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAop
Subscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1 Improve your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdY Filter your water: bit.ly/37QriDt Storable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com #1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK #1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3


wearechange--2020-12-08--India Faces Mass Hospitalizations as Mysterious, Deadly Illness Strikes Nearly 400 People

As coronavirus continues to spread across the world , a mysterious illness has been detected in India , with hundreds of people admitted to local hospitals and at least one dead .
New Delhi Television Limited ( NDTV ) reports that nearly 400 people have contracted a mystery illness that has emerged in Eluru , India .
At least one person died on Dec. 5 .
Local health officials are baffled and have yet to find the source of the illness .
Those who contracted the mysterious illness in the city , which is in the state of Andhra Pradesh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and nausea over the weekend .
This comes as Andhra Pradesh is one of the worst-affected states of COVID-19 .
Doctors ruled out that none of the patients were infected with the virus .
“ All patients have tested negative for Covid-19 , ” Dolla Joshi Roy , the district surveillance officer of Eluru ’ s West Godavari District , told CNN , adding that about 180 patients out of the 300 who were admitted to the hospital have been discharged .
At the same time , the rest are “ stable.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ had similar symptoms to the others but then had a fatal but unrelated cardiac arrest .
Andhra Pradesh ’ s Health Department published a notice that the patients ’ initial blood tests didn ’ t detect any viral infection , such as dengue or chikungunya .
Government authorities are now testing water samples in Eluru for possible contamination after many of the patients said they received water from a similar source .
The mass hospitalization over the weekend has prompted a special team of doctors to arrive in the city early this week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the illness .

As coronavirus continues to spread across the world, a mysterious illness has been detected in India, with hundreds of people admitted to local hospitals and at least one dead.
New Delhi Television Limited (NDTV) reports that nearly 400 people have contracted a mystery illness that has emerged in Eluru, India. At least one person died on Dec. 5. Local health officials are baffled and have yet to find the source of the illness.
Those who contracted the mysterious illness in the city, which is in the state of Andhra Pradesh, experienced seizures, loss of consciousness, and nausea over the weekend.
At least one dead and hundreds hospitalised in India's Eluru town from an unidentified illness, with symptoms including seizures, dizziness, nausea, and headaches pic.twitter.com/IwaO1WcksC — TRT World Now (@TRTWorldNow) December 7, 2020
This comes as Andhra Pradesh is one of the worst-affected states of COVID-19. Doctors ruled out that none of the patients were infected with the virus.
“All patients have tested negative for Covid-19,” Dolla Joshi Roy, the district surveillance officer of Eluru’s West Godavari District, told CNN, adding that about 180 patients out of the 300 who were admitted to the hospital have been discharged. At the same time, the rest are “stable.” She said the patient who died had similar symptoms to the others but then had a fatal but unrelated cardiac arrest.
Andhra Pradesh’s Health Department published a notice that the patients’ initial blood tests didn’t detect any viral infection, such as dengue or chikungunya.
Government authorities are now testing water samples in Eluru for possible contamination after many of the patients said they received water from a similar source.
“The cause is still unknown but still we are doing all kinds of testing, including testing food and milk,” said Roy
The mass hospitalization over the weekend has prompted a special team of doctors to arrive in the city early this week to conduct an investigation about possible sources of the illness.
To find out the root causes for such sudden illness in Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, the GoI is in continuous discussion with State Authorities and the @MoHFW_INDIA, has deployed a Central Team of 3 Doctors to visit the region tomorrow and submit a preliminary report by evening. pic.twitter.com/8Ri0Vq9rB1 — G Kishan Reddy (@kishanreddybjp) December 7, 2020
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-08--Corporate Media Silence Deafening as Former Bill Clinton Aide Confirms Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

A top Clinton insider has revealed that the former president visited the Caribbean home of notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein .
In a long interview last week with Vanity Fair , longtime aide to Bill Clinton , Doug Band , noted that , contrary to the official line , his boss did indeed spend time on Little Saint James , the private island that the billionaire pedophile used as a base to traffick and rape women and children .
Neither Band nor his interviewer appeared to realize the gravity of what he was revealing , the subject being touched upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wide-ranging 7,000-word conversation in which he noted that in January 2003 , Clinton flew on Epstein ’ s notorious “ Lolita Express ” private jet to the island .
Band appeared to bring the incident up only as a way of distancing himself from the disgraced pedophile , who died under mysterious circumstances in a Manhattan prison in July last year .
Band insisted that he knew nothing of Epstein ’ s misdeeds , but “ got enough bad vibes that he advised Clinton to end the relationship , ” refusing to travel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ employer .
Flight logs show Clinton made around two dozen trips on the infamous airplane .
Band is certainly a source in the know .
For years he served as Clinton ’ s most trusted aide and confidant , traveling by his side and arranging his appointments for him .
The former president famously did not carry even a cellphone , meaning that everyone from journalists to even Hillary and Chelsea Clinton would have had to go through Band to speak to him .
Band ’ s testimony adds weight to others who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the island .
Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre previously stated that Clinton “ strolled into ” Epstein ’ s private villa with “ two lovely girls ” in his arms .
“ There was no modesty between any of them , ” she said .
“ I remember asking Jeffrey what ’ s Bill Clinton doing here , ” Giuffre said in an interview earlier this year , “ and he laughed it off and said ‘ well he owes me a favor.
’ ” Epstein ’ s former IT and maintenance contractor also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the island , an assertion that Clinton has denied .
The former president was also photographed receiving a massage from Epstein victim Chauntae Davies while at an airport , on route via the Lolita Express .
While the press might be forgiven for focussing more on the pandemic and the election , the virtual silence from corporate media has been deafening .
The bombshell that Clinton ’ s closest confidant — whom friends describe as being like a “ son ” to him — has been totally ignored by the New York Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MSNBC , CBS News , and CNN , with no relevant results appearing in searches on their websites .
ABC News , which for three years sat on information that could have resulted in an arrest , also did not cover the story .
It was therefore left to more Republican-aligned , anti-Democrat media to play it up , the news appearing in conservative outlets like the Daily Wire , Fox News , and the New York Post .
Unfortunately , this reinforces a partisan understanding of the Epstein case .
Earlier this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year of Epstein coverage on MSNBC and Fox News found intensely partisan coverage of the predator ’ s ties to Presidents Trump and Clinton .
While MSNBC stressed his connections to the Republicans and downplayed his links to their preferred president , Fox News did the opposite , overwhelmingly focusing on the Clinton connections while failing to inform viewers about his relationship with the sitting president .
Clinton has a long history of accusations of sexual misconduct against him .
Arkansas nursing home administrator Juanita Broaddrick claimed that he raped her in 1978 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state .
Paula Jones accused Clinton of sexual assault and exposing himself to her in 1991 , while Kathleen Willey accused Clinton of groping her without her consent in 1993 .
On the last charge , he reportedly proclaimed his innocence by arguing that Wiley ’ s breasts were not big enough for him to be interested .
He was also infamously impeached for lying about his affair with 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky .
Trump , meanwhile , also has his own history of sexual misconduct , the Wikipedia page on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Epstein was a convicted sex offender who was accused by dozens of women of trafficking , rape , or sexual assault , his crimes also involving a host of wealthy and well-connected individuals .
His own enormous wealth appears to have come from his suspicious connection to Victoria ’ s Secret tycoon Leslie Wexner .
For years , his links to the most influential figures and organizations seem to have kept him from justice , and , after his death , put the spotlight on them .
Over the years , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the rich and powerful all over the world , which included business magnates , heads of state , university professors , and some of the nation ’ s top journalists .
Perhaps this explains why so few in the media are willing to touch the latest twist in this neverending story .

A top Clinton insider has revealed that the former president visited the Caribbean home of notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein. In a long interview last week with Vanity Fair, longtime aide to Bill Clinton, Doug Band, noted that, contrary to the official line, his boss did indeed spend time on Little Saint James, the private island that the billionaire pedophile used as a base to traffick and rape women and children.
Neither Band nor his interviewer appeared to realize the gravity of what he was revealing, the subject being touched upon only briefly towards the end of a wide-ranging 7,000-word conversation in which he noted that in January 2003, Clinton flew on Epstein’s notorious “Lolita Express” private jet to the island. Band appeared to bring the incident up only as a way of distancing himself from the disgraced pedophile, who died under mysterious circumstances in a Manhattan prison in July last year. Band insisted that he knew nothing of Epstein’s misdeeds, but “got enough bad vibes that he advised Clinton to end the relationship,” refusing to travel aboard Epstein’s jet with his employer. Flight logs show Clinton made around two dozen trips on the infamous airplane.
Band is certainly a source in the know. For years he served as Clinton’s most trusted aide and confidant, traveling by his side and arranging his appointments for him. The former president famously did not carry even a cellphone, meaning that everyone from journalists to even Hillary and Chelsea Clinton would have had to go through Band to speak to him.
Band’s testimony adds weight to others who have already said they saw him on the island. Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre previously stated that Clinton “strolled into” Epstein’s private villa with “two lovely girls” in his arms. “There was no modesty between any of them,” she said. “I remember asking Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here,” Giuffre said in an interview earlier this year, “and he laughed it off and said ‘well he owes me a favor.’” Epstein’s former IT and maintenance contractor also said he saw the former president on the island, an assertion that Clinton has denied. The former president was also photographed receiving a massage from Epstein victim Chauntae Davies while at an airport, on route via the Lolita Express.
While the press might be forgiven for focussing more on the pandemic and the election, the virtual silence from corporate media has been deafening. The bombshell that Clinton’s closest confidant — whom friends describe as being like a “son” to him — has been totally ignored by the New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News, MSNBC, CBS News, and CNN, with no relevant results appearing in searches on their websites. ABC News, which for three years sat on information that could have resulted in an arrest, also did not cover the story.
It was therefore left to more Republican-aligned, anti-Democrat media to play it up, the news appearing in conservative outlets like the Daily Wire, Fox News, and the New York Post. Unfortunately, this reinforces a partisan understanding of the Epstein case. Earlier this year, a MintPress study of one year of Epstein coverage on MSNBC and Fox News found intensely partisan coverage of the predator’s ties to Presidents Trump and Clinton. While MSNBC stressed his connections to the Republicans and downplayed his links to their preferred president, Fox News did the opposite, overwhelmingly focusing on the Clinton connections while failing to inform viewers about his relationship with the sitting president.
Clinton has a long history of accusations of sexual misconduct against him. Arkansas nursing home administrator Juanita Broaddrick claimed that he raped her in 1978 while he was Attorney General of the state. Paula Jones accused Clinton of sexual assault and exposing himself to her in 1991, while Kathleen Willey accused Clinton of groping her without her consent in 1993. On the last charge, he reportedly proclaimed his innocence by arguing that Wiley’s breasts were not big enough for him to be interested. He was also infamously impeached for lying about his affair with 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Trump, meanwhile, also has his own history of sexual misconduct, the Wikipedia page on the subject is nearly 10,000 words long.
Epstein was a convicted sex offender who was accused by dozens of women of trafficking, rape, or sexual assault, his crimes also involving a host of wealthy and well-connected individuals. His own enormous wealth appears to have come from his suspicious connection to Victoria’s Secret tycoon Leslie Wexner. For years, his links to the most influential figures and organizations seem to have kept him from justice, and, after his death, put the spotlight on them. Over the years, he built up a vast portfolio of connections to the rich and powerful all over the world, which included business magnates, heads of state, university professors, and some of the nation’s top journalists. Perhaps this explains why so few in the media are willing to touch the latest twist in this neverending story.
Republished from MintPressNews.com under Creative Commons


wearechange--2020-12-08--Democrat Proposes Tying $1,500 Stimulus Checks to COVID Vaccinations

With Democrats and Republicans still stuck at an impasse on stimulus negotiations , one Maryland Congressman and erstwhile presidential candidate named John Delaney has engineered a novel strategy for killing two birds with one stone : dispersing another round of stimulus funds , while ensuring that enough Americans consent to receiving the vaccine that the US can quickly top the roughly 70 % immunity threshold at which point scientists believe the vaccine will stop propagating .
And that plan is : Offering Americans a $ 1,500 “ incentive payment ” to acquiesce to receiving both doses of the vaccine .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ all Americans , even those who still refuse , because it might help the country crush the virus more quickly .
To be sure , Delaney ’ s plan has virtually zero chance of becoming law .
Republicans and Democrats can ’ t even seem to agree on basic things like the size of the package ( $ 600BN or $ 900BN ) and whether businesses deserve a liability shield to stop them from being sued by people claiming to have been infected in their establishment ( GOP leader Mitch McConnell sees this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently promised Americans that the vaccine wouldn ’ t be mandatory .
Delaney initially conceived of the scheme as a workaround for the widespread public skepticism about the vaccine .
While recent opinion polls show that the number of Americans planning to get the vaccine as soon as it ’ s available has been on the upswing , more than 40 % of the population either has already been infected , doesn ’ t see any urgent need for a vaccine , or simply doesn ’ t trust the data .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health officials are anxious that the vaccine won ’ t have enough credibility to convince enough Americans to accept it .
With so much at stake , it makes sense that some other “ incentives ” might be considered .
Others , including some industry leaders and lobbyists , are even threatening to make accepting the vaccine mandatory for employees to return to work .
Presumably , those who refuse won ’ t be allowed to return , effectively tying their ability to earn a living to their acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since a “ black market ” for doses is almost assured , particularly after Pfizer and Moderna have warned they won ’ t be able to deliver any additional doses until mid-2021 ( this , just days after Pfizer cut its end-2021 delivery target by 50 % due to issues with raw materials ) .
Delaney told CNBC that Americans are going to need some kind of an incentive to encourage them to take the vaccine .
Though he reckoned that even those who refuse to participate will still benefit from the program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 380MM , because once COVID is eradicated , everybody will benefit .
To be sure , while Delaney ’ s plan might seem workable on the surface , experts pointed out that it would likely be difficult and costly to pull off .
Some experts are skeptical that such a plan could work .
“ It ’ s an interesting idea , ” said Bill Hoagland , senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former Senate staffer , however , he felt it would be wrong to tie people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , given the initial shortage of doses .
Plus , the IRS ’ s dated IT systems might buckle from the effort of cross-checking whether individuals actually had received their vaccinations before doling out the stimulus money .
Other countries , including Mexico , have used “ incentive ” payments like this to get their vaccination rate up .
But as Delaney willfully admits , in the US , we already have a pretty strong system of incentives to encourage vaccinations , and what ’ s more , it ’ s mostly targeted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that require students to get their shots before they ’ re allowed in a classroom .
So , why should the federal government spend all that money when there are other , cheaper , ways to pressure families into submitting ?

With Democrats and Republicans still stuck at an impasse on stimulus negotiations, one Maryland Congressman and erstwhile presidential candidate named John Delaney has engineered a novel strategy for killing two birds with one stone: dispersing another round of stimulus funds, while ensuring that enough Americans consent to receiving the vaccine that the US can quickly top the roughly 70% immunity threshold at which point scientists believe the vaccine will stop propagating.
And that plan is: Offering Americans a $1,500 “incentive payment” to acquiesce to receiving both doses of the vaccine. Delaney argued that the plan would benefit all Americans, even those who still refuse, because it might help the country crush the virus more quickly.
“The faster we get 75% of this country vaccinated, the faster we end Covid and the sooner everything returns to normal,” Delaney said in an interview with CNBC.com.
To be sure, Delaney’s plan has virtually zero chance of becoming law. Republicans and Democrats can’t even seem to agree on basic things like the size of the package ($600BN or $900BN) and whether businesses deserve a liability shield to stop them from being sued by people claiming to have been infected in their establishment (GOP leader Mitch McConnell sees this as a must). President Trump recently promised Americans that the vaccine wouldn’t be mandatory.
Delaney initially conceived of the scheme as a workaround for the widespread public skepticism about the vaccine. While recent opinion polls show that the number of Americans planning to get the vaccine as soon as it’s available has been on the upswing, more than 40% of the population either has already been infected, doesn’t see any urgent need for a vaccine, or simply doesn’t trust the data.
It’s also the latest indication that public health officials are anxious that the vaccine won’t have enough credibility to convince enough Americans to accept it. With so much at stake, it makes sense that some other “incentives” might be considered.
Others, including some industry leaders and lobbyists, are even threatening to make accepting the vaccine mandatory for employees to return to work. Presumably, those who refuse won’t be allowed to return, effectively tying their ability to earn a living to their acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine and/or their ability to get one (since a “black market” for doses is almost assured, particularly after Pfizer and Moderna have warned they won’t be able to deliver any additional doses until mid-2021 (this, just days after Pfizer cut its end-2021 delivery target by 50% due to issues with raw materials).
Delaney told CNBC that Americans are going to need some kind of an incentive to encourage them to take the vaccine.
“We have to create, in my judgment, an incentive for people to really accelerate their thinking about taking the vaccine,” Delaney said. To be sure, those who are not comfortable receiving the vaccine would not be forced to do so.
Though he reckoned that even those who refuse to participate will still benefit from the program, which he said could cost roughly $380MM, because once COVID is eradicated, everybody will benefit.
“If you’re still afraid of the vaccine and don’t want to take it, that’s your right,” Delaney said. “You won’t participate in this program. “But guess what?” he added. “You’re going to benefit anyhow, because we’ll get the country to herd immunity faster, which benefits you. So I think everyone wins.”
To be sure, while Delaney’s plan might seem workable on the surface, experts pointed out that it would likely be difficult and costly to pull off.
Some experts are skeptical that such a plan could work. “It’s an interesting idea,” said Bill Hoagland, senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former Senate staffer, however, he felt it would be wrong to tie people’s stimulus checks to vaccine timetable, given the initial shortage of doses. Plus, the IRS’s dated IT systems might buckle from the effort of cross-checking whether individuals actually had received their vaccinations before doling out the stimulus money.
Other countries, including Mexico, have used “incentive” payments like this to get their vaccination rate up. But as Delaney willfully admits, in the US, we already have a pretty strong system of incentives to encourage vaccinations, and what’s more, it’s mostly targeted at children: states have vaccination rules that require students to get their shots before they’re allowed in a classroom.
So, why should the federal government spend all that money when there are other, cheaper, ways to pressure families into submitting?
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-08--HOLY COW! China Brags About Controlling US Establishment And Biden

In today’s video, we cover huge revelations about China’s control of the US political and financial systems.
Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChange Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAop
Subscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1 Improve your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdY Filter your water: bit.ly/37QriDt Storable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com #1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK #1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3


wearechange--2020-12-08--Luke Rudkowski on Timcast IRL: Israeli Official CONFIRMS Existence of Aliens, Says THEY’RE HERE!

Luke Rudkowski went back on Timcast IRL last night to discuss what an Israeli official said about aliens.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.


wearechange--2020-12-09--“Not a Criminal”: Top UN Anti-Torture Official Calls for Julian Assange’s Release

The United Nations ’ top official on torture Tuesday called for British authorities to release or place under house arrest WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange , citing the risk of Covid-19 infection in London ’ s notorious Belmarsh Prison and condemning a decade of “ arbitrary deprivation of liberty ” that has “ severely violated ” the jailed journalist ’ s human rights .
U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer ’ s comments came in a statement noting reports that some 65 of the 165 inmates at Belmarsh , including numerous prisoners in the wing where Assange is jailed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s legal team has repeatedly called for his release , citing pre-existing health conditions—including heart problems and respiratory infections—that place the 49-year-old journalist and publisher at elevated risk for potentially deadly Covid-19 complications .
The U.N .
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention previously found that Assange had been arbitrarily deprived of his freedom since his arrest on December 7 , 2010 , including house arrest , imprisonment in London , and seven years spent receiving political asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in the British capital .
Assange has been imprisoned in Belmarsh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ near total isolation ” since April 2019 as he awaits a U.K. court ’ s decision on whether he will be extradited to the United States to face charges of violating the 1917 Espionage Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for publishing classified U.S. military documents and files on WikiLeaks a decade ago .
Among the materials published by WikiLeaks are the Afghanistan and Iraq War Logs , which revealed U.S. and coalition war crimes , many of them leaked by Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning .
Perhaps the most infamous of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Murder ” video , which shows U.S. Army attack helicopter crews laughing as they gunned down a group of Iraqi civilians that included journalists and children .
While the soldiers and commanders implicated in the materials published by WikiLeaks have largely enjoyed impunity , Manning served seven years in prison before her sentence was commuted by outgoing President Barack Obama in 2017 .
Meanwhile , Assange faces up to 175 years behind bars if found guilty of all charges against him .
“ The British authorities initially detained Mr. Assange on the basis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in connection with allegations of sexual misconduct that have since been formally dropped due to lack of evidence , ” Melzer said in his statement .
“ Today , he is detained for exclusively preventative purposes , to ensure his presence during the ongoing U.S. extradition trial , a proceeding which may well last several years.
” “ Mr .
Assange is not a criminal convict and poses no threat to anyone , so his prolonged solitary confinement in a high security prison is neither necessary nor proportionate and clearly lacks any legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been growing calls for President Donald Trump to pardon Assange during his last weeks in office , including by exiled former National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden , filmmaker Oliver Stone , actress and activist Pamela Anderson , and musician Roger Waters .
Melzer—who has repeatedly called Assange ’ s treatment “ torture ” —added that the whistleblower ’ s “ rights have been severely violated for more than a decade.
” Additionally , Melzer advised British authorities to decline the U.S. extradition request , citing serious human rights concerns in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , rape , and other abuses ( pdf ) .
“ He must now be allowed to live a normal family , social and professional life , to recover his health , and to adequately prepare his defense against the U.S. extradition request pending against him , ” he said .

The United Nations’ top official on torture Tuesday called for British authorities to release or place under house arrest WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, citing the risk of Covid-19 infection in London’s notorious Belmarsh Prison and condemning a decade of “arbitrary deprivation of liberty” that has “severely violated” the jailed journalist’s human rights.
U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer’s comments came in a statement noting reports that some 65 of the 165 inmates at Belmarsh, including numerous prisoners in the wing where Assange is jailed, have tested positive for coronavirus.
Assange’s legal team has repeatedly called for his release, citing pre-existing health conditions—including heart problems and respiratory infections—that place the 49-year-old journalist and publisher at elevated risk for potentially deadly Covid-19 complications.
The U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention previously found that Assange had been arbitrarily deprived of his freedom since his arrest on December 7, 2010, including house arrest, imprisonment in London, and seven years spent receiving political asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in the British capital.
Today, I urgently call on the #UK to:
– release #Assange amid Covid-19 outbreak at HMP Belmarsh
– prevent his extradition to the #US due to #HumanRights concerns
– end 10yrs of persecution, abuse & arbitrary detention Direct link: https://t.co/fcRNZBGnAl pic.twitter.com/HmApDr16j7 — Nils Melzer (@NilsMelzer) December 8, 2020
Assange has been imprisoned in Belmarsh in conditions described by Melzer as “near total isolation” since April 2019 as he awaits a U.K. court’s decision on whether he will be extradited to the United States to face charges of violating the 1917 Espionage Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for publishing classified U.S. military documents and files on WikiLeaks a decade ago.
Among the materials published by WikiLeaks are the Afghanistan and Iraq War Logs, which revealed U.S. and coalition war crimes, many of them leaked by Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning. Perhaps the most infamous of the leaks is the so-called “Collateral Murder” video, which shows U.S. Army attack helicopter crews laughing as they gunned down a group of Iraqi civilians that included journalists and children.
It has been exactly 10 years since Julian #Assange was first arrested in the UK.
He has not enjoyed a day of full liberty ever since.
All this for revealing US government abuses – If extradited he faces a furher 175 year sentence
Stand up for Assange – Stand up for a free press pic.twitter.com/CWOAYqDpNw — Defend Assange Campaign (@DefendAssange) December 7, 2020
While the soldiers and commanders implicated in the materials published by WikiLeaks have largely enjoyed impunity, Manning served seven years in prison before her sentence was commuted by outgoing President Barack Obama in 2017. Meanwhile, Assange faces up to 175 years behind bars if found guilty of all charges against him.
“The British authorities initially detained Mr. Assange on the basis of an arrest warrant issued by Sweden in connection with allegations of sexual misconduct that have since been formally dropped due to lack of evidence,” Melzer said in his statement. “Today, he is detained for exclusively preventative purposes, to ensure his presence during the ongoing U.S. extradition trial, a proceeding which may well last several years.”
“Mr. Assange is not a criminal convict and poses no threat to anyone, so his prolonged solitary confinement in a high security prison is neither necessary nor proportionate and clearly lacks any legal basis,” Melzer continued.
There have been growing calls for President Donald Trump to pardon Assange during his last weeks in office, including by exiled former National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden, filmmaker Oliver Stone, actress and activist Pamela Anderson, and musician Roger Waters.
Mr. President, if you grant only one act of clemency during your time in office, please: free Julian Assange. You alone can save his life. @realDonaldTrump — Edward Snowden (@Snowden) December 3, 2020
Melzer—who has repeatedly called Assange’s treatment “torture”—added that the whistleblower’s “rights have been severely violated for more than a decade.”
Additionally, Melzer advised British authorities to decline the U.S. extradition request, citing serious human rights concerns in a nation whose prisons are rife with torture, rape, and other abuses (pdf).
“He must now be allowed to live a normal family, social and professional life, to recover his health, and to adequately prepare his defense against the U.S. extradition request pending against him,” he said.
Republished from CommonDreams.org under Creative Commons


wearechange--2020-12-09--56% of Americans Now Say They Would Live in a Tiny Home

Although the micro home movement isn ’ t necessarily new , many have put tiny homes on their radar since COVID-19 .
Whether it ’ s a weekend escape from city living , or even a tiny backyard office , these dwellings have seen a recent boom in popularity .
IPX 1031 recently did an extended analysis of the sector which is presented below , but here is a summary of what they found : • 56 % of Americans say they would live in a tiny home .
86 % of first-time home buyers would consider a tiny home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of home buyers would consider buying a tiny home as an investment property .
• Most appealing factors of tiny home living : 1 .
Affordability 2 .
Efficiency 3 .
Eco-friendliness 4 .
Minimalist lifestyle 5 .
The ability to downsize .
• 53 % of Americans can afford the median price for a starter home ( $ 233,400 ) vs. 79 % of Americans can afford the median price of a tiny home ( $ 30,000- $ 60,000 ) .
Below is the full survey report from IPX 1031 : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tiny living , we surveyed 2,000 Americans across the country to find out how likely they would be to live in a tiny home and what amenities they would like to have in a tiny home .
We also analyzed Google search volume to determine where tiny homes are most popular around the country .
Living in a tiny home is certainly an adjustment that isn ’ t right for every lifestyle , but more than half of respondents say they would consider living in one .
Unique factors such as affordability ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % ) , eco-friendliness ( 48 % ) and the ability to live a minimal lifestyle ( 44 % ) are among the top reasons why respondents say they would like to live in a tiny home .
It ’ s also interesting to note that among those who have never owned a home , 86 % say they would consider buying a tiny home for their first home .
Considering that most tiny homes are 400 square feet or less , many can be built on wheels , which allow homeowners to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ respondents , 54 % would prefer their tiny home to be mobile and a majority ( 54 % ) would prefer that their home is under 400 square feet .
With such a small amount of living space , it ’ s no surprise that the ideal number of people to live in a tiny home is two .
In terms of amenities , heating/AC ( 60 % ) , kitchen space ( 58 % ) , designated bedroom ( 48 % ) , laundry ( 43 % ) and outdoor space with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most desired and “ must haves , ” according to respondents .
The price to purchase or build a tiny home can vary and depends on a number of factors .
Most tiny homes cost between $ 30,000 to $ 60,000 while the median price for a starter home is $ 233,400 , according to the National Association of Realtors .
Exactly half of respondents say they would spend less than $ 40,000 on a tiny home and 79 % say they would be able to buy or finance a tiny home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Where Are Tiny Homes Most Popular ?
When most people think of tiny homes , images of a secluded lot in the woods or a home nestled near a lake come to mind .
We were curious to see where tiny homes are the most popular , so we analyzed Google search volume for more than 1,300 terms and keywords related to tiny homes .
The results show that tiny homes have seen the most interest in rural states such as Vermont , New Hampshire , Maine , Wyoming and Washington .
Illinois @ @ @ @ @ @ @ showed the least interest in searches for tiny homes .
With a low cost to build and maintain , tiny homes could bring big profits for property investors .
According to respondents , 72 % would consider buying a tiny home to serve as an investment property .
Among those , 63 % say they would rent out their tiny home as a long-term rental while 37 % say they would rent their tiny home as a short-term rental .
On average , respondents say their ideal monthly rent would be set at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rental and $ 145 per night for a short-term rental .
With many Americans adapting to remote work or working from home , the concept of a tiny office ( or a “ backyard office ” ) is an appealing alternative to working inside a home office , kitchen or living room .
In fact , more than half ( 54 % ) say they would buy a tiny office and 62 % of remote workers would consider buying one .
Ideally , more than a quarter of respondents say they would spend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ backyard office .
With many Americans adapting to remote work or working from home , the concept of a tiny office ( or a “ backyard office ” ) is an appealing alternative to working inside a home office , kitchen or living room .
In fact , more than half ( 54 % ) say they would buy a tiny office and 62 % of remote workers would consider buying one .
Ideally , more than a quarter of respondents say they would spend less than $ 8,000 on a tiny backyard @ @

Although the micro home movement isn’t necessarily new, many have put tiny homes on their radar since COVID-19. Whether it’s a weekend escape from city living, or even a tiny backyard office, these dwellings have seen a recent boom in popularity. IPX 1031 recently did an extended analysis of the sector which is presented below, but here is a summary of what they found:
56% of Americans say they would live in a tiny home. 86% of first-time home buyers would consider a tiny home for their first home.
72% of home buyers would consider buying a tiny home as an investment property.
Most appealing factors of tiny home living: 1. Affordability 2. Efficiency 3. Eco-friendliness 4. Minimalist lifestyle 5. The ability to downsize.
Most desired tiny home amenities: 1. Heating/AC 2. Kitchen space 3. Designated bedroom 4. Laundry 5. Outdoor space.
53% of Americans can afford the median price for a starter home ($233,400) vs. 79% of Americans can afford the median price of a tiny home ($30,000-$60,000).
Top states for tiny homes: 1. Vermont 2. New Hampshire 3. Maine 4. Wyoming 5. Washington 6. Idaho 7. Montana 8. Oregon 9. Rhode Island 10. Alaska.
Below is the full survey report from IPX 1031:
In order to get more insight on tiny living, we surveyed 2,000 Americans across the country to find out how likely they would be to live in a tiny home and what amenities they would like to have in a tiny home. We also analyzed Google search volume to determine where tiny homes are most popular around the country.
Tiny Home Lifestyle
Living in a tiny home is certainly an adjustment that isn’t right for every lifestyle, but more than half of respondents say they would consider living in one. Unique factors such as affordability (65%), efficiency (57%), eco-friendliness (48%) and the ability to live a minimal lifestyle (44%) are among the top reasons why respondents say they would like to live in a tiny home.
It’s also interesting to note that among those who have never owned a home, 86% say they would consider buying a tiny home for their first home.
The Ideal Tiny Home
Considering that most tiny homes are 400 square feet or less, many can be built on wheels, which allow homeowners to live a mobile lifestyle. According to respondents, 54% would prefer their tiny home to be mobile and a majority (54%) would prefer that their home is under 400 square feet.
With such a small amount of living space, it’s no surprise that the ideal number of people to live in a tiny home is two. In terms of amenities, heating/AC (60%), kitchen space (58%), designated bedroom (48%), laundry (43%) and outdoor space with a view (42%) are the most desired and “must haves,” according to respondents.
Tiny Home Budget
The price to purchase or build a tiny home can vary and depends on a number of factors. Most tiny homes cost between $30,000 to $60,000 while the median price for a starter home is $233,400, according to the National Association of Realtors. Exactly half of respondents say they would spend less than $40,000 on a tiny home and 79% say they would be able to buy or finance a tiny home rather than a traditional starter home.
Where Are Tiny Homes Most Popular?
When most people think of tiny homes, images of a secluded lot in the woods or a home nestled near a lake come to mind. We were curious to see where tiny homes are the most popular, so we analyzed Google search volume for more than 1,300 terms and keywords related to tiny homes.
The results show that tiny homes have seen the most interest in rural states such as Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Wyoming and Washington. Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York showed the least interest in searches for tiny homes.
Tiny Home Investment Property
With a low cost to build and maintain, tiny homes could bring big profits for property investors. According to respondents, 72% would consider buying a tiny home to serve as an investment property. Among those, 63% say they would rent out their tiny home as a long-term rental while 37% say they would rent their tiny home as a short-term rental. On average, respondents say their ideal monthly rent would be set at $900 per month for a long-term rental and $145 per night for a short-term rental.
Tiny Office
With many Americans adapting to remote work or working from home, the concept of a tiny office (or a “backyard office”) is an appealing alternative to working inside a home office, kitchen or living room. In fact, more than half (54%) say they would buy a tiny office and 62% of remote workers would consider buying one. Ideally, more than a quarter of respondents say they would spend less than $8,000 on a tiny backyard office.
With many Americans adapting to remote work or working from home, the concept of a tiny office (or a “backyard office”) is an appealing alternative to working inside a home office, kitchen or living room. In fact, more than half (54%) say they would buy a tiny office and 62% of remote workers would consider buying one. Ideally, more than a quarter of respondents say they would spend less than $8,000 on a tiny backyard office.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-12-09--WOW! Already They’re Finding MANY Adverse Reactions!

In today’s video, we cover scary breaking news about the results of trial runs of the jab.
Follow us on Telegram: t.me/s/News4AChange Sign up for our newsletter: bit.ly/3ijjAop
Subscribe on LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@wearechange:1 Improve your gut health: bit.ly/34GHbdY Filter your water: bit.ly/37QriDt Storable food for emergencies: SafePreparedAndReady.com #1 best source of Collagen: bit.ly/3mw5uRK #1 best VPN to use: bit.ly/3iT4Ew3