wearechange--2020-07-25--Wealthy Elites Buy Private Islands to Isolate From “Coronavirus Storm”

As the virus pandemic continues to spread around the world , demand is surging for private islands as wealthy elites escape virus-infected metros .
The evolution of elites abandoning cities started during lockdowns .
Folks with economic mobility packed up their bags and headed to rural communities and towns as major cities were engulfed with the virus and resulting lockdowns .
Shortly after lockdowns eased , social-unrest exploded across the country , which was another major factor in the exodus .
Let ’ s not forget , the rapid advances in technology have made it possible for white-collar folks to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suburbs isn ’ t enough for some folks , there appears to be increasing demand for private islands in recent months .
Financial Times spoke with real estate agents who say demand for “ private hideaways ” in the South Pacific , Caribbean , and remote parts of the US and Europe are becoming in high demand in the age of virus pandemic .
Trayor Lesnock , founder of Platinum Luxury Auctions , and the agent who is selling a small island in Fiji , called Mai Island , said the pandemic has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and pursue new living environments to isolate themselves .
Financial Times points out wealthy buyers aren ’ t just purchasing tropical islands , a 157-acre island , called Horse Island , off the south-west coast of Ireland recently sold for €5.5m ( $ 6.6 million ) .
Farhad Vladi , a German businessman who has sold 3,000 islands in five decades , said the pandemic had caused a “ spike ” in wealthy folks buying islands .
He said , “ less expensive islands in Scandinavia and Canada ” are being purchased @ @ @ @ @ @ @ visiting the properties .
Agents said private islands off the coasts of countries that have strict social distancing , and low cases and deaths are in high demand .
Many of these islands are based around Australia , New Zealand , and the South Pacific islands .
Pumpkin Island , a private island off Australia ’ s Great Barrier Reef Marine Park , was recently listed for $ 25 million , is described by owners as a “ safe haven ” from the pandemic .
The trend is clear : wealthy elites are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now decided to buy private islands as the virus pandemic shows no signs of abating .

As the virus pandemic continues to spread around the world, demand is surging for private islands as wealthy elites escape virus-infected metros.
The evolution of elites abandoning cities started during lockdowns. Folks with economic mobility packed up their bags and headed to rural communities and towns as major cities were engulfed with the virus and resulting lockdowns. Shortly after lockdowns eased, social-unrest exploded across the country, which was another major factor in the exodus. Let’s not forget, the rapid advances in technology have made it possible for white-collar folks to work remotely.
While fleeing to the suburbs isn’t enough for some folks, there appears to be increasing demand for private islands in recent months.
Financial Times spoke with real estate agents who say demand for “private hideaways” in the South Pacific, Caribbean, and remote parts of the US and Europe are becoming in high demand in the age of virus pandemic.
Trayor Lesnock, founder of Platinum Luxury Auctions, and the agent who is selling a small island in Fiji, called Mai Island, said the pandemic has allowed people to “reassess their lives” and pursue new living environments to isolate themselves.
“Owning an island has long been considered cool and desirable, but it’s often been a whimsical dream,” Lesnock said. “But with Covid-19, it’s starting to look a lot more practical, as people rush to find private spaces for themselves and keep a distance from others.”
Financial Times points out wealthy buyers aren’t just purchasing tropical islands, a 157-acre island, called Horse Island, off the south-west coast of Ireland recently sold for €5.5m ($6.6 million).
“There’s obviously a thought process in people’s minds — particularly those that can afford these multimillion-euro properties — that they can just get away and self-isolate,” said Callum Bain, a surveyor at Colliers International, the real estate agent that helped sell the island.
Farhad Vladi, a German businessman who has sold 3,000 islands in five decades, said the pandemic had caused a “spike” in wealthy folks buying islands. He said, “less expensive islands in Scandinavia and Canada” are being purchased at the moment with buyers not even visiting the properties.
Agents said private islands off the coasts of countries that have strict social distancing, and low cases and deaths are in high demand. Many of these islands are based around Australia, New Zealand, and the South Pacific islands.
Pumpkin Island, a private island off Australia’s Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, was recently listed for $25 million, is described by owners as a “safe haven” from the pandemic.
“We’ve weathered the [coronavirus] storm well and people are looking for places where they will have space and where they don’t feel like they’re on top of someone else?.?.?. I definitely think that’s an attraction,” said Laureth Rumble, whose family owns Pumpkin Island.
The trend is clear: wealthy elites are fleeing cities for rural communities, have now decided to buy private islands as the virus pandemic shows no signs of abating.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-07-25--Pentagon Found “Off-World Vehicles Not Made on This Earth”; Marco Rubio Hopes It’s Alien

As secretive unit operating within the U.S. Department of Defense that is charged with investigating unidentified flying objects ( UFOs ) will make some of its findings public after it was revealed that the Pentagon has been recently briefed about “ off-world vehicles not made on this earth.
” The once-covert UFO unit , which operates within the U.S. Navy ’ s Office of Naval Intelligence , will soon begin giving regular biannual updates on its research to the U.S. Senate ’ s Intelligence Committee , reports The New York Times .
The Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force was formed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strange and inexplicable encounters between U.S. military pilots and unidentified aerial vehicles or UFOs in a bid “ to standardize collection and reporting ” of the various sightings .
The program is the successor to the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program , which also investigated UFOs but was dissolved in 2017 due to a lapse of funding .
However , the team working on that program continued its work alongside the intelligence community even after it was officially disbanded .
Luis Elizondo , a former military intelligence official who headed the Pentagon program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decade with the program .
Elizondo , along with a group of former government scientists and officials , remain convinced that objects of unkown origin have crashed on Earth and that these apparently extraterrestrial materials have been the focus of research .
“ It no longer has to hide in the shadows , ” Elizondo told the Times .
“ It will have a new transparency.
” Former Senate majority leader and retired Sen. Harry Reid ( D-NV ) , who led the push to fund the earlier UFO program , also believes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of day .
“ After looking into this , I came to the conclusion that there were reports — some were substantive , some not so substantive — that there were actual materials that the government and the private sector had in their possession , ” Reid said .
So far , none of the alleged crash artifacts have been subject to public scrutiny or verification by independent researchers .
However , some of the retrieved objects such as strange metallic debris were identified as being manmade – raising the possibility that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. rivals such as China or Russia .
However , astrophysicist Eric Davis – who served as an advisor for the Pentagon program since 2007 – said that he had briefed the Pentagon in March about material retrieved from “ off-world vehicles not made on this earth.
” The Department of Defense subcontractor also said that he had concluded that the objects found were of the type “ we couldn ’ t make … ourselves.
” In an interview last month , President Donald Trump told his son Donald Trump Jr. that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about supposed aliens as well as the secretive Area 51 base near Roswell , New Mexico , that some theorists claim is a UFO crash site .
The U.S. government has been increasingly open in its discussions of UFOs since last September , when U.S. Navy admitted that widely-circulated video footage captured by Navy pilots that purportedly showed UFOs flying through the skies did depict actual “ unknown ” objects that flew into U.S. airspace .
While officials admitted that they have been baffled by the unknown flying objects , they also admit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ frequent .
They also said that rather than calling them “ UFOs , ” they prefer the term unidentified aerial phenomena or UAPs .
While it remains yet to be seen what information the once-secret UFO unit plans to lay out for lawmakers , acting intelligence committee chairman Sen. Marco Rubio ( R-FL ) is intent on finding out who or what precisely is behind the apparent UFO activity over U.S. military bases .
“ We have things flying over our military bases and places where we are conducting military exercises and we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — and it isn ’ t ours , ” Rubio told CBS Miami in an interview last Friday .
“ Frankly , that if it ’ s something from outside this planet — that might actually be better than the fact that we ’ ve seen some technological leap on behalf of the Chinese or the Russians or some other adversary that allows them to conduct this sort of activity , ” the hawkish senator added .
For Reid , further transparency is needed .
“ It is extremely important that information about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ craft come out , ” he said .

As secretive unit operating within the U.S. Department of Defense that is charged with investigating unidentified flying objects (UFOs) will make some of its findings public after it was revealed that the Pentagon has been recently briefed about “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”
The once-covert UFO unit, which operates within the U.S. Navy’s Office of Naval Intelligence, will soon begin giving regular biannual updates on its research to the U.S. Senate’s Intelligence Committee, reports The New York Times.
The Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force was formed in 2019 for the purpose of studying strange and inexplicable encounters between U.S. military pilots and unidentified aerial vehicles or UFOs in a bid “to standardize collection and reporting” of the various sightings.
The program is the successor to the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, which also investigated UFOs but was dissolved in 2017 due to a lapse of funding. However, the team working on that program continued its work alongside the intelligence community even after it was officially disbanded.
Luis Elizondo, a former military intelligence official who headed the Pentagon program, resigned in October 2017 after a decade with the program. Elizondo, along with a group of former government scientists and officials, remain convinced that objects of unkown origin have crashed on Earth and that these apparently extraterrestrial materials have been the focus of research.
“It no longer has to hide in the shadows,” Elizondo told the Times. “It will have a new transparency.”
Former Senate majority leader and retired Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), who led the push to fund the earlier UFO program, also believes that the studies should see the light of day.
“After looking into this, I came to the conclusion that there were reports — some were substantive, some not so substantive — that there were actual materials that the government and the private sector had in their possession,” Reid said.
So far, none of the alleged crash artifacts have been subject to public scrutiny or verification by independent researchers. However, some of the retrieved objects such as strange metallic debris were identified as being manmade – raising the possibility that they could be related to the military of U.S. rivals such as China or Russia.
However, astrophysicist Eric Davis – who served as an advisor for the Pentagon program since 2007 – said that he had briefed the Pentagon in March about material retrieved from “off-world vehicles not made on this earth.”
The Department of Defense subcontractor also said that he had concluded that the objects found were of the type “we couldn’t make … ourselves.”
In an interview last month, President Donald Trump told his son Donald Trump Jr. that he had heard some “interesting” things about supposed aliens as well as the secretive Area 51 base near Roswell, New Mexico, that some theorists claim is a UFO crash site.
The U.S. government has been increasingly open in its discussions of UFOs since last September, when U.S. Navy admitted that widely-circulated video footage captured by Navy pilots that purportedly showed UFOs flying through the skies did depict actual “unknown” objects that flew into U.S. airspace.
While officials admitted that they have been baffled by the unknown flying objects, they also admit that past encounters with them have been frequent. They also said that rather than calling them “UFOs,” they prefer the term unidentified aerial phenomena or UAPs.
While it remains yet to be seen what information the once-secret UFO unit plans to lay out for lawmakers, acting intelligence committee chairman Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is intent on finding out who or what precisely is behind the apparent UFO activity over U.S. military bases.
“We have things flying over our military bases and places where we are conducting military exercises and we don’t know what it is — and it isn’t ours,” Rubio told CBS Miami in an interview last Friday.
“Frankly, that if it’s something from outside this planet — that might actually be better than the fact that we’ve seen some technological leap on behalf of the Chinese or the Russians or some other adversary that allows them to conduct this sort of activity,” the hawkish senator added.
For Reid, further transparency is needed.
“It is extremely important that information about the discovery of physical materials or retrieved craft come out,” he said.
Republished from TheMindUnleashed.com with permission


wearechange--2020-07-28--More Explosive Leaks From OPCW Show Trump Bombed Syria on False Grounds

As the ongoing increased sanctions regimen on Syria demonstrates , Washington ’ s pursuit of regime change against Assad is not over , despite Damascus clearly having won the war , and with the US having wisely ditched talk of some kind of overt major Iraq-style military intervention ( as was the case under Obama in August 2013 ) .
While mainstream media has largely “ moved on ” from coverage of Syria ( so much for feigned humanitarian “ concern ” for millions of Syrians suffering under severe American-led sanctions ! )
, some analysts like independent journalist Aaron @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the chemical weapons watchdog Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons ( OPCW ) .
“ A series of leaked documents from the OPCW raise the possibility that the Trump administration bombed Syria on false grounds and pressured officials at the world ’ s top chemical weapons watchdog to cover it up , ” Maté ’ s latest report in The Nation begins .
“ Two OPCW officials , highly regarded scientists with more than 25 years of combined experience at the organization , challenged the whitewash from inside .
Yet unlike many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have found no champion , or even an audience , within establishment circles in the United States , ” the report continues .
Recall that President Trump bombed Syria on two occasions .
On the last occasion , in April 2018 , Damascus was pummeled with a series of major tomahawk missile strikes ostensibly in response to claims by the primarily Saudi-backed jihadist group Jaysh al-Islam that the Syrian Army had carried out a chemical weapons attack on civilians .
It was the all too familiar pattern which went back to 2013 : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being wiped out make a last ditch unverified claim in order to draw Western military support , then the mainstream media runs with it because it already fits the narrative of the “ monster ” Assad , and then right away it ’ s American and allied “ bombs away ” with no questions asked .
But Maté now documents an avalanche of leaks and internal dissent within the global chemical weapons watchdog group OPCW to say the US once again attacked a Middle East country based on lies ( and just like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forget that some 1,000 or more American troops occupy the oil-rich northeast section of Syria ) .
Maté ’ s report finds that “ Since May 2019 , internal OPCW documents , including a trove published by WikiLeaks , reveal that the Douma investigators ’ initial report reached different conclusions than their organization ’ s published version .
They were overruled by senior officials who kept evidence from the public.
” The Nation report outlines leaks ’ key revelations as follows : • Senior OPCW officials reedited the Douma investigators ’ initial report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the original .
Key facts were removed or misrepresented and conclusions were rewritten to support the allegation that a chlorine gas attack had occurred in Douma .
Yet the team ’ s initial report did not conclude that a chemical attack occurred , and left open the possibility that victims were killed in a “ non-chemical related ” incident .
• Four experts from a OPCW and NATO-member state conducted a toxicology review at the OPCW team ’ s request .
They concluded that observed symptoms of the civilians in Douma , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as well as the concentration of victims filmed in the apartment building so close to fresh air , “ were inconsistent with exposure to chlorine , and no other obvious candidate chemical causing the symptoms could be identified.
” • Chemical tests of the samples collected in Douma showed that chlorine compounds were , in most cases , detected at what amounted to trace quantities in the parts-per-billion range .
Yet this finding was not disclosed publicly .
Furthermore , it later emerged that the chemicals themselves did not stand out as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the initial report , the OPCW ’ s top expert in chemical weapons chemistry , they could have resulted from contact with household products such as bleach or come from chlorinated water or wood preservatives .
• The author of the initial report protested the revisions in an e-mail expressing his “ gravest concern.
” The altered version “ misrepresents the facts , ” he wrote , thereby “ undermining its credibility.
” • Following the e-mail of protest over the manipulation of the team ’ s findings , the OPCW published a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Around that time , OPCW executives decreed that the probe would be handled by a so-called “ core team , ” which excluded all of the Douma investigators who had traveled to Syria , except for one paramedic .
It was this core team—not the inspectors who had been deployed to Douma and signed off on the original document—that produced the final report of March 2019 .
• After the e-mail of protest , and just days before the interim report was published on July 6 , a US government delegation met with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to convince them that the Syrian government had committed a chemical attack with chlorine .
According to veteran reporter Jonathan Steele , who interviewed one of the whistle-blowers , the Douma team saw the meeting as “ unacceptable pressure and a violation of the OPCW ’ s declared principles of independence and impartiality.
” Interference by state parties is explicitly prohibited under the Chemical Weapons Convention .
• The inference drawn from the OPCW ’ s final report—widely disseminated , including by the Trump administration—was that gas cylinders found in Douma likely came @ @ @ @ @ @ @ engineering study reached the opposite conclusion .
The study evaluated competing hypotheses : Either the cylinders were dropped from the sky or they were manually placed .
There is “ a higher probability , ” it concluded , “ that both cylinders were manually placed…rather than being delivered from aircraft.
” At “ Location 4 , ” where a cylinder was found on a bed , the study determined that the cylinder was too large to have penetrated the hole in the roof above ; at the other site , “ Location 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cylinder and to the roof it allegedly penetrated were incompatible with an aircraft bombing .
Ballistics experts also said it was more likely that the crater had been made by an explosion , probably from an artillery round , a rocket , or a mortar .
With both cylinders , the study concluded , “ the alternative hypothesis ” —that the cylinders were manually placed and that the craters were caused by other means— ” produced the only plausible explanation for observations at the scene.
” Of course , the media is seeking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way .
They are being conveniently ignored , and not just ignored , but covered up .
Read the full in-depth investigative report at The Nation .

As the ongoing increased sanctions regimen on Syria demonstrates, Washington’s pursuit of regime change against Assad is not over, despite Damascus clearly having won the war, and with the US having wisely ditched talk of some kind of overt major Iraq-style military intervention (as was the case under Obama in August 2013).
While mainstream media has largely “moved on” from coverage of Syria (so much for feigned humanitarian “concern” for millions of Syrians suffering under severe American-led sanctions!), some analysts like independent journalist Aaron Maté have been detailing damning leaks from the chemical weapons watchdog Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).
“A series of leaked documents from the OPCW raise the possibility that the Trump administration bombed Syria on false grounds and pressured officials at the world’s top chemical weapons watchdog to cover it up,” Maté’s latest report in The Nation begins.
“Two OPCW officials, highly regarded scientists with more than 25 years of combined experience at the organization, challenged the whitewash from inside. Yet unlike many whistle-blowers of the Trump era, they have found no champion, or even an audience, within establishment circles in the United States,” the report continues.
Recall that President Trump bombed Syria on two occasions. On the last occasion, in April 2018, Damascus was pummeled with a series of major tomahawk missile strikes ostensibly in response to claims by the primarily Saudi-backed jihadist group Jaysh al-Islam that the Syrian Army had carried out a chemical weapons attack on civilians. It was the all too familiar pattern which went back to 2013: “rebels” on the brink of being wiped out make a last ditch unverified claim in order to draw Western military support, then the mainstream media runs with it because it already fits the narrative of the “monster” Assad, and then right away it’s American and allied “bombs away” with no questions asked.
But Maté now documents an avalanche of leaks and internal dissent within the global chemical weapons watchdog group OPCW to say the US once again attacked a Middle East country based on lies (and just like in neighboring Iraq, don’t forget that some 1,000 or more American troops occupy the oil-rich northeast section of Syria).
My bad: Western state-funded Bellingcat "gathered evidence… long before the OPCW." Ignore then those "truthers/and or propagandists" who for some silly reason listen to actual OPCW scientists w/ actual credentials & who actually conducted the OPCW's investigation in Syria. https://t.co/zjtDShQ2eL — Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) July 25, 2020
Maté’s report finds that “Since May 2019, internal OPCW documents, including a trove published by WikiLeaks, reveal that the Douma investigators’ initial report reached different conclusions than their organization’s published version. They were overruled by senior officials who kept evidence from the public.”
The Nation report outlines leaks’ key revelations as follows:
Senior OPCW officials reedited the Douma investigators’ initial report to produce a version that sharply deviated from the original. Key facts were removed or misrepresented and conclusions were rewritten to support the allegation that a chlorine gas attack had occurred in Douma. Yet the team’s initial report did not conclude that a chemical attack occurred, and left open the possibility that victims were killed in a “non-chemical related” incident.
Four experts from a OPCW and NATO-member state conducted a toxicology review at the OPCW team’s request. They concluded that observed symptoms of the civilians in Douma, particularly the rapid onset of excessive frothing, as well as the concentration of victims filmed in the apartment building so close to fresh air, “were inconsistent with exposure to chlorine, and no other obvious candidate chemical causing the symptoms could be identified.”
Chemical tests of the samples collected in Douma showed that chlorine compounds were, in most cases, detected at what amounted to trace quantities in the parts-per-billion range . Yet this finding was not disclosed publicly. Furthermore, it later emerged that the chemicals themselves did not stand out as unique: According to the author of the initial report, the OPCW’s top expert in chemical weapons chemistry, they could have resulted from contact with household products such as bleach or come from chlorinated water or wood preservatives.
. Yet this finding was not disclosed publicly. Furthermore, it later emerged that the chemicals themselves did not stand out as unique: According to the author of the initial report, the OPCW’s top expert in chemical weapons chemistry, they could have resulted from contact with household products such as bleach or come from chlorinated water or wood preservatives. The author of the initial report protested the revisions in an e-mail expressing his “gravest concern.” The altered version “misrepresents the facts,” he wrote, thereby “undermining its credibility.”
Following the e-mail of protest over the manipulation of the team’s findings, the OPCW published a watered-down interim report in July 2018. Around that time, OPCW executives decreed that the probe would be handled by a so-called “core team,” which excluded all of the Douma investigators who had traveled to Syria , except for one paramedic. It was this core team—not the inspectors who had been deployed to Douma and signed off on the original document—that produced the final report of March 2019.
, except for one paramedic. It was this core team—not the inspectors who had been deployed to Douma and signed off on the original document—that produced the final report of March 2019. After the e-mail of protest, and just days before the interim report was published on July 6, a US government delegation met with members of the investigation team to try to convince them that the Syrian government had committed a chemical attack with chlorine . According to veteran reporter Jonathan Steele, who interviewed one of the whistle-blowers, the Douma team saw the meeting as “unacceptable pressure and a violation of the OPCW’s declared principles of independence and impartiality.” Interference by state parties is explicitly prohibited under the Chemical Weapons Convention.
. According to veteran reporter Jonathan Steele, who interviewed one of the whistle-blowers, the Douma team saw the meeting as “unacceptable pressure and a violation of the OPCW’s declared principles of independence and impartiality.” Interference by state parties is explicitly prohibited under the Chemical Weapons Convention. The inference drawn from the OPCW’s final report—widely disseminated, including by the Trump administration—was that gas cylinders found in Douma likely came from Syrian military aircraft. An unpublished engineering study reached the opposite conclusion. The study evaluated competing hypotheses: Either the cylinders were dropped from the sky or they were manually placed. There is “a higher probability,” it concluded, “that both cylinders were manually placed…rather than being delivered from aircraft.” At “Location 4,” where a cylinder was found on a bed, the study determined that the cylinder was too large to have penetrated the hole in the roof above; at the other site, “Location 2,” the observed damage to the cylinder and to the roof it allegedly penetrated were incompatible with an aircraft bombing. Ballistics experts also said it was more likely that the crater had been made by an explosion, probably from an artillery round, a rocket, or a mortar. With both cylinders, the study concluded, “the alternative hypothesis”—that the cylinders were manually placed and that the craters were caused by other means—”produced the only plausible explanation for observations at the scene.”
Of course, the media is seeking for these revelations to be memory-holed right way.
New WikiLeaks Bombshell: 20 Inspectors Dissent From Syria Chemical Attack Narrative https://t.co/vrQaBZIT7T — zerohedge (@zerohedge) December 15, 2019
They are being conveniently ignored, and not just ignored, but covered up.
* * *
Read the full in-depth investigative report at The Nation.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-07-28--“Like Nothing We’ve Ever Seen”: Imminent Eviction Wave is Coming!

The eviction moratorium expired last Friday nearly four months after the US economy effectively shutdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic , and more than 12 million renters – all behind on rent payments because of the virus-induced recession – are now at imminent risk of getting booted to the curb .
This Friday , some 25 million Americans will no longer receive their weekly $ 600 federal unemployment checks , and the next round of government handouts , currently discussed by Republicans and Democrats , could see benefits slashed from $ 600 to $ 200 ( or be nothing at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congress ) .
This would crush household finances across middle-class America , resulting in an even higher number of households unable to pay their rent bill in the months ahead .
That said , Trump ’ s top economic advisor Larry Kudlow , who has religiously pumped stocks with meaningless headlines any time the S & P is even barely in the red , recently said an extension for the eviction moratorium program could be seen .
But what if there isn ’ t one ?
In late July , more than 31 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form .
The economic recovery reversed in late June , as the next crisis among households looms .
In 2016 , there were 2.3 million evictions , Pollock said .
On Sunday , food bank lines reemerged as people ’ s benefits ran out .
The number of jobless Americans is staggering and downright , depressionary , suggesting no labor market recovery this year or next .
With a fiscal cliff unfolding , benefits set to run out , and a rebound in the economy reversing , Household Pulse Data from mid-July outlines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The analysis is based on Household Pulse Data from mid-July and it found that some states will be hit harder than others .
For example , West Virginia is estimated to have the highest share of renter households facing eviction at close to 60 % .
Tennessee , Minnesota , Mississippi , Florida and Louisiana are all among the states set to be worst impacted with shares at 50 % or higher .
Elsewhere , Vermont is the state where renters will be at the lowest risk of eviction , though 22 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the course of the crisis .
– Forbes Shown below ( charted by Statista ) , here are the states where renters will be pressured the most .
The Trump administration doesn ’ t have the tools to solve the crisis – fiscal and monetary policy can only delay round two of the economic crash until after the elections .
Meanwhile chaos and disagreement on Capitol Hill means that there is still no deal on a rent moratorium extension , which means that the coming weeks could see the largest ever US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2008 look like child ’ s play .

The eviction moratorium expired last Friday nearly four months after the US economy effectively shutdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and more than 12 million renters – all behind on rent payments because of the virus-induced recession – are now at imminent risk of getting booted to the curb.
This Friday, some 25 million Americans will no longer receive their weekly $600 federal unemployment checks, and the next round of government handouts, currently discussed by Republicans and Democrats, could see benefits slashed from $600 to $200 (or be nothing at all if no deal is reached in Congress). This would crush household finances across middle-class America, resulting in an even higher number of households unable to pay their rent bill in the months ahead.
That said, Trump’s top economic advisor Larry Kudlow, who has religiously pumped stocks with meaningless headlines any time the S&P is even barely in the red, recently said an extension for the eviction moratorium program could be seen. But what if there isn’t one?
In late July, more than 31 million Americans collected unemployment benefits of some form. The economic recovery reversed in late June, as the next crisis among households looms.
“It’s like nothing we’ve ever seen,” said John Pollock, coordinator of the National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel.
In 2016, there were 2.3 million evictions, Pollock said.
“There could be that many evictions in August,” he said.
On Sunday, food bank lines reemerged as people’s benefits ran out. The number of jobless Americans is staggering and downright, depressionary, suggesting no labor market recovery this year or next.
With a fiscal cliff unfolding, benefits set to run out, and a rebound in the economy reversing, Household Pulse Data from mid-July outlines an even gloomier rent crisis unfolding.
The analysis is based on Household Pulse Data from mid-July and it found that some states will be hit harder than others. For example, West Virginia is estimated to have the highest share of renter households facing eviction at close to 60%. Tennessee, Minnesota, Mississippi, Florida and Louisiana are all among the states set to be worst impacted with shares at 50% or higher. Elsewhere, Vermont is the state where renters will be at the lowest risk of eviction, though 22% of them will potentially lose their homes over the course of the crisis. – Forbes
Shown below (charted by Statista), here are the states where renters will be pressured the most.
The Trump administration doesn’t have the tools to solve the crisis – fiscal and monetary policy can only delay round two of the economic crash until after the elections.
Meanwhile chaos and disagreement on Capitol Hill means that there is still no deal on a rent moratorium extension, which means that the coming weeks could see the largest ever US rent crisis, one which would make 2008 look like child’s play.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-07-28--Twitter Locks Trump Jr Account for Posting Viral Video of Pro-Hydroxychloroquine Doctors

Twitter locked the account of Donald Trump Jr. for approximately 12 hours , after the president ’ s son posted a viral video of doctors touting Hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 .
The video , which received over 14 million views before it was blacklisted and scrubbed by Facebook , Twitter and YouTube following a complaint by a New York Times employee , featured members of America ’ s Frontline Doctors – a recently formed advocacy group which claims that “ American life has fallen casualty to a massive disinformation campaign ” against Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) – a decades-old malaria @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries as part of their front-line treatment of the novel coronavirus , yet which has shown mixed efficacy in studies .
The press conference began with South Carolina Congressman Ralph Norman discussing the need to get America ’ s children back to school , before the doctors introduce themselves and describe their experiences with HCQ .
Reactions to Silicon Valley ’ s decision to scrub the press conference , as well as Trump Jr. ’ s temporary suspension , have drawn the ire of supporters and free speech advocates alike .
For those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the heart of the controversy and draw their own conclusions , click here .

Twitter locked the account of Donald Trump Jr. for approximately 12 hours, after the president’s son posted a viral video of doctors touting Hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19.
BREAKING: @Twitter & @jack have suspended @DonaldJTrumpJr for posting a viral video of medical doctors talking about Hydroxychloroquine. Big Tech is the biggest threat to free expression in America today & they're continuing to engage in open election interference – full stop. pic.twitter.com/7dJbauq43O — Andrew Surabian (@Surabees) July 28, 2020
The video, which received over 14 million views before it was blacklisted and scrubbed by Facebook, Twitter and YouTube following a complaint by a New York Times employee, featured members of America’s Frontline Doctors – a recently formed advocacy group which claims that “American life has fallen casualty to a massive disinformation campaign” against Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) – a decades-old malaria drug used by India and several other countries as part of their front-line treatment of the novel coronavirus, yet which has shown mixed efficacy in studies.
The press conference began with South Carolina Congressman Ralph Norman discussing the need to get America’s children back to school, before the doctors introduce themselves and describe their experiences with HCQ.
Social media companies are censoring videos of Dr. Stella Immanuel and the other doctors involved in real-time because that’s what Democrats want them to do. Many doctors & studies say hydroxychloroquine works. They don’t want @realDonaldTrump to be right. pic.twitter.com/v2xHu0hsM4 — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) July 28, 2020
Reactions to Silicon Valley’s decision to scrub the press conference, as well as Trump Jr.’s temporary suspension, have drawn the ire of supporters and free speech advocates alike.
Facebook isn't unbiased… the comms guy representing them on Twitter spent his ENTIRE CAREER working for Democrats in Congress before going to FACEBOOK. https://t.co/av8pSYKn4r — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) July 28, 2020
Now @YouTube has pulled the video of the doctors. I don’t care if you think the doctors are geniuses or nuts. If you value the foundations of our country, you should be questioning why social media companies are colluding to stop licensed doctors from expressing opinions freely. — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) July 28, 2020
Here’s the guys involved. I just have to ask. @andymstone, what business does Facebook have overruling the medical expertise of licensed doctors who’ve seen hydroxychloroquine work in patients and in studies? Is Facebook unilaterally deciding what science or medicine is accurate? pic.twitter.com/ABBESyZ182 — Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) July 28, 2020
Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are taking this video down. This is an extremely dangerous precedent to set for the media. Posting a video does not necessarily mean you agree with all of it’s content or that it’s entirely true. Big Tech should be careful for their own good.. pic.twitter.com/ECKk5rysx6 — Benny (@bennyjohnson) July 28, 2020
For those who dare view the dangerous wrongthink at the heart of the controversy and draw their own conclusions, click here.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-07-31--Revealed: Top Highlights From Ghislaine Maxwell’s Unsealed Court Records

Dozens of exhibits related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were unsealed on Thursday evening , providing insight into allegations against the financier and his purported ‘ madam , ’ as well as other high-profile individuals , including Bill Clinton , Alan Dershowitz and several other people whose names one can only guess ( and the internet has ) .
The documents , related to a 2015 civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell by Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre , were ordered to be released on July 23 by US District Judge Loretta Preska – which also included flight logs from Epstein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as police reports from the multiple locations where Epstein maintained residences .
Bill Clinton was allegedly on pedo island with ‘ 2 young girls ’ Virginia Giuffre asked Comey ’ s FBI for evidence in their possession , and was ignored .
Maxwell was in communication with Epstein in January of 2015 – contradicting her claim that she hadn ’ t been in touch with him in more than a decade .
Alan Dershowitz is mentioned several times ( and has gone to great lengths to defend himself – suggesting on multiple occasions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exonerate him ) .
Epstein accuser ( s ) allegedly had to have sex with this guy… Other speculative mentions ( redacted ) : Prince Andrew , Jean Luc Brunel , and more .
Trump is in the clear ( which we ’ ve known for some time ) in this case : And some food for thought…

Dozens of exhibits related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were unsealed on Thursday evening, providing insight into allegations against the financier and his purported ‘madam,’ as well as other high-profile individuals, including Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz and several other people whose names one can only guess (and the internet has).
The documents, related to a 2015 civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell by Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre, were ordered to be released on July 23 by US District Judge Loretta Preska – which also included flight logs from Epstein’s private jets, as well as police reports from the multiple locations where Epstein maintained residences.
Among the findings:
Bill Clinton was allegedly on pedo island with ‘2 young girls’
Witness interview: Bill Clinton was at Epstein's island with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and "2 young girls." pic.twitter.com/NG8PbaZLNt — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
Later in that interview: V: He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors. They’re all in each other’s pockets. JS: When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here, where was here? V: On the island. Doc: https://t.co/DyASI4SvIm pic.twitter.com/0yjsMUiCvo — Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 31, 2020
Sordid details from alleged sexual encounters
Virginia Giuffre asked Comey’s FBI for evidence in their possession, and was ignored.
Heartbreaking – The minor victim was asking the FBI for the evidence (photos and videos) they seized from Epstein. Why? So she could prosecute her civil case. pic.twitter.com/WlISCmN6Ze — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
The DOJ let free Epstein's co-conspirator's in the FL case. This included Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. Here the victim describes the abuse during flights from Epstein, Maxwell, and Kellen. pic.twitter.com/1zF2MELFDw — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
At the time Epstein signed his plea deal… The FBI and DOJ knew it had not interviewed all his victims. pic.twitter.com/tyLdj56Hx5 — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
Of course:
What kind of info do you have to handover to get away with one of the most horrendous crimes a human being can commit in the span of three decades? The answer is most likely none since Epstein was working with the feds. pic.twitter.com/hIK8G2K2ym — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 31, 2020
Maxwell was in communication with Epstein in January of 2015 – contradicting her claim that she hadn’t been in touch with him in more than a decade.
This so far is the most interesting thing to emerge: Maxwell and Epstein emailing in January 2015, despite Maxwell's claims not to have been in touch with Epstein in more than a decade. pic.twitter.com/FOr6nSAOFJ — David Enrich (@davidenrich) July 31, 2020
Alan Dershowitz is mentioned several times (and has gone to great lengths to defend himself – suggesting on multiple occasions that this very document release would in exonerate him).
NEWS: This same document appears also to have been released publicly tonight in unredacted form and shows Jane Doe 3 accusing Alan Dershowitz. @CourthouseNews https://t.co/lgTDT2yq88 pic.twitter.com/AyehpGYVBY — Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 31, 2020
Maybe this is why Alan Dershowitz keeps insisting that he always visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island with his wife… pic.twitter.com/o8azhwS0Po — Andrew Feinberg (@AndrewFeinberg) July 31, 2020
Epstein accuser(s) allegedly had to have sex with this guy…
Serious allegations – Maxwell directed the minor to have sex with former MIT scientist Marvin Minsky at Epstein's complex in the US Virgin Islands. (Minsky pictured.) pic.twitter.com/BUluGMu9Wo — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
Other speculative mentions (redacted): Prince Andrew, Jean Luc Brunel, and more.
Note: Virginia Giuffre used to be known in court documents as Jane Doe 3. The same doc shows similar allegations she has made against Prince Andrew and Jean-Luc Brunel.https://t.co/xMKi02ewA2 pic.twitter.com/T6x4qPZOec — Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 31, 2020
Jane Doe 3 also said she was forced to have sex with a powerful [REDACTED] individual "in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment), in New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (in an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls)." pic.twitter.com/GUmyuNQYuS — Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 31, 2020
Trump is in the clear (which we’ve known for some time) in this case:
"Donald Trump was aiso a good friend of Jeffreys. He didn't partake in sex with any of us but he flirted with me. He'd laugh and tell Jeffrey, 'You've got the life.'"https://t.co/gQ8dtoLkyO — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) July 31, 2020
And some food for thought…
Obama Admin – Did nothing on Epstein for 8 years despite evidence Bush Admin – Cut sweetheart deal with Epstein Clinton Admin – Intimate ties with Epstein — Jack Posobiec ?? (@JackPosobiec) July 31, 2020
Michelle Obama: Harvey Weinstein is a wonderful human being, a good friend and just a powerhouse (November 8, 2013) pic.twitter.com/IPh2iLUjlQ — Wojciech Pawelczyk (@Woj_Pawelczyk) February 24, 2020
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-07-31--Secret Ghislaine Maxwell Files Related to Jeffrey Epstein Unsealed by Federal Judge

Late on Thursday , a federal judge publicly released dozens of new documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell ’ s dealings @ @ @ @ @ ’ s what we ’ ve found so far : More documents are expected to @ @ @ @ @ .
Click here to view the 89-page PDF yourself .

Late on Thursday, a federal judge publicly released dozens of new documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell’s dealings with Jeffrey Epstein.
Here’s what we’ve found so far:
Why did the FBI sit on their ass since the 1990’s with victims coming forward to them about Epstein, this is insane. pic.twitter.com/29epnngnwf — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 31, 2020
Men who Ghislaine Maxwell directed Virginia Giuffre to engage in activities with, according to Giuffre's deposition: – Alan Dershowitz
– Glenn Dubin
– Stephen Kaufmann
– Prince Andrew
– Jean Luc Brunel
– Bill Richardson
– Marvin Minsky Other names, many more names, redacted. pic.twitter.com/bPLztoIkEP — Epstein Files Unsealed by Cernovich (@Cernovich) July 31, 2020
The fact that many names are redacted is absolutely unacceptable, why protect those accused of doing something so horrible? pic.twitter.com/bh2Euxh63i — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 31, 2020
Whoa – a witness says Bill Clinton was with two young girls on pedo island pic.twitter.com/uwMMlvZgLZ — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 31, 2020
Six references to Bill Clinton in Virginia Roberts' chat with her lawyers on April 7, 2011: Asked about Epstein boasting "Bill Clinton owes me favors," Giuffe said: "Yes. I do. It was a laugh though. He would laugh it off… I didn't know if he was serious. It was just a joke." pic.twitter.com/InugMgHOz5 — Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 31, 2020
Later in that interview: V: He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors. They’re all in each other’s pockets. JS: When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here, where was here? V: On the island. Doc: https://t.co/DyASI4SvIm pic.twitter.com/0yjsMUiCvo — Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) July 31, 2020
Serious allegations – Maxwell directed the minor to have sex with former MIT scientist Marvin Minsky at Epstein's complex in the US Virgin Islands. (Minsky pictured.) pic.twitter.com/BUluGMu9Wo — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
Heartbreaking – The minor victim was asking the FBI for the evidence (photos and videos) they seized from Epstein. Why? So she could prosecute her civil case. pic.twitter.com/WlISCmN6Ze — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
FYI documents involving Maxwell’s deposition have not been released yet. The documents released now are from Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre’s 2015 civil action against Maxwell. — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 31, 2020
What kind of info do you have to handover to get away with one of the most horrendous crimes a human being can commit in the span of three decades? The answer is most likely none since Epstein was working with the feds. pic.twitter.com/hIK8G2K2ym — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 31, 2020
One of the major discoveries is Bill Clinton being with children on Pedo island. Also the FBI literally sitting back while everything was happening right under their nose, with witnesses asking them for the evidence for their own cases. https://t.co/ujICeVA0wc — Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 31, 2020
More documents are expected to be unsealed throughout the evening. Click here to view the 89-page PDF yourself.


wearechange--2020-07-31--HOLY COW: There Are MAJOR Revelations In These Documents!

OH YEAH , since we are not corporate or government owned help us out here .
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT @ @

In this video, we reveal the biggest bombshell revelations from the document dump in the elite child trafficking ring case.
RELATED:
Revealed: Top Highlights From Ghislaine Maxwell’s Unsealed Court Records
Secret Ghislaine Maxwell Files Related to Jeffrey Epstein Unsealed by Federal Judge


wearechange--2020-08-01--Red Flags Soar as Big Pharma Will Be Exempt From COVID-19 Vaccine Liability Claims

Last week we warned readers to be cautious about new COVID-19 vaccines , highlighting how key parts of the clinical trials are being skipped as big pharma will not be held accountable for adverse side effects for administering the experimental drugs .
A senior executive from AstraZeneca , Britain ’ s second-largest drugmaker , told Reuters that his company was just granted protection from all legal action if the company ’ s vaccine led to damaging side effects .
“ This is a unique situation where we as a company simply can not take the risk if in … four @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” said Ruud Dobber , a top exec at AstraZeneca .
“ In the contracts we have in place , we are asking for indemnification .
For most countries , it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest , ” said Dobber , adding that Astra and regulators were making safety and tolerability a top priority .
AstraZeneca is one of the 25 pharmaceutical companies across the world , testing experimental drugs that could be used to combat the deadly virus .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive results , AstraZeneca could manufacture hundreds of millions of doses , with no legal recourse if side effects are seen .
European officials told Reuters that product liability was a significant discussion to secure new vaccine drugs from Pfizer , Sanofi , and Johnson & Johnson .
As for the US , well , when it comes to the legal framework around vaccines , the US Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) already has a law called the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness ( PREP ) Act , which provides immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
With AstraZeneca , and many US big pharma companies rushing COVID-19 vaccines to market with governments granting them immunity if the vaccine has side effects , all suggest corporate elites and government regulators have very little faith in these drugs .
For more color on leading vaccines in development that produce “ severe ” side effects , read our latest piece titled “ Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Induced Adverse Reactions In “ More Than Half ” Of Trial Participants.
” Maybe these rushed vaccines are more for optics , get consumers back into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ malls .
The major red flag is how governments are allowing big pharma to rush experimental vaccines , with no legal recourse if something goes terribly wrong .

Last week we warned readers to be cautious about new COVID-19 vaccines, highlighting how key parts of the clinical trials are being skipped as big pharma will not be held accountable for adverse side effects for administering the experimental drugs.
A senior executive from AstraZeneca, Britain’s second-largest drugmaker, told Reuters that his company was just granted protection from all legal action if the company’s vaccine led to damaging side effects.
“This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in … four years the vaccine is showing side effects,” said Ruud Dobber, a top exec at AstraZeneca.
“In the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries, it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest,” said Dobber, adding that Astra and regulators were making safety and tolerability a top priority.
AstraZeneca is one of the 25 pharmaceutical companies across the world, testing experimental drugs that could be used to combat the deadly virus. And, of course, if testing yields positive results, AstraZeneca could manufacture hundreds of millions of doses, with no legal recourse if side effects are seen.
European officials told Reuters that product liability was a significant discussion to secure new vaccine drugs from Pfizer, Sanofi, and Johnson & Johnson.
As for the US, well, when it comes to the legal framework around vaccines, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) already has a law called the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which provides immunity to vaccine companies if something goes wrong.
With AstraZeneca, and many US big pharma companies rushing COVID-19 vaccines to market with governments granting them immunity if the vaccine has side effects, all suggest corporate elites and government regulators have very little faith in these drugs.
For more color on leading vaccines in development that produce “severe” side effects, read our latest piece titled “Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Induced Adverse Reactions In “More Than Half” Of Trial Participants.”
Maybe these rushed vaccines are more for optics, get consumers back into airplanes, hotels, resorts, and malls.
The major red flag is how governments are allowing big pharma to rush experimental vaccines, with no legal recourse if something goes terribly wrong.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-01--Unsealed Court Documents Reveal Testimony of Bill Clinton With “Young Girls” on Epstein’s Island

Last night , a set of documents were unsealed from a previous civil trial between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre , one of the most public and outspoken of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s victims .
After Giuffre went public with her accusations in 2010 , she faced a storm of very public denials and attacks from Epstein ’ s associates which lasted for years .
As a result , Giuffre filed defamation lawsuits against those who attacked her in the media .
A lawsuit against Maxwell was settled in June of 2017 , but everything that was revealed during the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that Maxwell was forced to pay Giuffre millions of dollars in the settlement .
Maxwell ’ s attorneys have fought to keep the details of the civil trial sealed , but their requests were denied by a judge who ordered the documents to be unsealed this Thursday .
Among the information revealed in the documents , is Giuffre ’ s testimony that she saw former Democratic President Bill Clinton on Epstein ’ s island with “ two young girls ” from New York .
In her testimony , Guiffre said that she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owed him some favors .
“ He would laugh it off .
You know , I remember asking Jeffrey what ’ s Bill Clinton doing here [ on Epstein ’ s island ] kind of thing , and he laughed it off and said well he owes me favors .
He never told me what favors they were .
I never knew .
I didn ’ t know if he was serious .
It was just a joke… He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors .
They ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pockets , ” she said in her testimony , according to Newsweek .
It is well-documented that Clinton was closely connected with both Epstein and Maxwell , and spent a significant amount of time on Epstein ’ s island .
He also continued to hang out with them after they were both exposed as sex offenders .
In fact , Maxwell was served court papers relating to the Epstein trafficking ring in 2009 while she was attending the Clinton Global Initiative at the Sheraton Hotel in New York City .
Just a few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s wedding , and Bill continued his relationship with both of them for many years despite the public knowledge of their crimes .
After Epstein was arrested last year , The Clinton Foundation was forced to respond to the allegations that the former president was a participant in Epstein ’ s trafficking network .
The foundation claimed that Clinton “ knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to , ” and suggested that “ Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein ’ s airplane .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and his Secret Service detail traveled on every trip .
He ’ s not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade , and has never been to Little St. James Island , Epstein ’ s ranch in New Mexico , or his residence in Florida , ” the statement read .
However , according to flight logs that were leaked in 2015 , Clinton has taken at least 11 flights on Epstein ’ s airplane .
Clinton is just one of many high profile individuals who are suspected of being involved in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ names include Prince Andrew and President Donald Trump .

Last night, a set of documents were unsealed from a previous civil trial between Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre, one of the most public and outspoken of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims.
After Giuffre went public with her accusations in 2010, she faced a storm of very public denials and attacks from Epstein’s associates which lasted for years.
As a result, Giuffre filed defamation lawsuits against those who attacked her in the media. A lawsuit against Maxwell was settled in June of 2017, but everything that was revealed during the trial was sealed, aside from the fact that Maxwell was forced to pay Giuffre millions of dollars in the settlement.
Maxwell’s attorneys have fought to keep the details of the civil trial sealed, but their requests were denied by a judge who ordered the documents to be unsealed this Thursday.
Among the information revealed in the documents, is Giuffre’s testimony that she saw former Democratic President Bill Clinton on Epstein’s island with “two young girls” from New York.
In her testimony, Guiffre said that she remembered Epstein telling her that Bill Clinton owed him some favors.
“He would laugh it off. You know, I remember asking Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here [on Epstein’s island] kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me favors. He never told me what favors they were. I never knew. I didn’t know if he was serious. It was just a joke… He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors. They’re all in each other’s pockets,” she said in her testimony, according to Newsweek.
It is well-documented that Clinton was closely connected with both Epstein and Maxwell, and spent a significant amount of time on Epstein’s island.
He also continued to hang out with them after they were both exposed as sex offenders. In fact, Maxwell was served court papers relating to the Epstein trafficking ring in 2009 while she was attending the Clinton Global Initiative at the Sheraton Hotel in New York City.
Just a few months later, Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s wedding, and Bill continued his relationship with both of them for many years despite the public knowledge of their crimes.
After Epstein was arrested last year, The Clinton Foundation was forced to respond to the allegations that the former president was a participant in Epstein’s trafficking network.
The foundation claimed that Clinton “knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to,” and suggested that “Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane.
“Staff, supporters of the Foundation, and his Secret Service detail traveled on every trip. He’s not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade, and has never been to Little St. James Island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida,” the statement read.
However, according to flight logs that were leaked in 2015, Clinton has taken at least 11 flights on Epstein’s airplane. Clinton is just one of many high profile individuals who are suspected of being involved in Epstein’s trafficking network. Other names include Prince Andrew and President Donald Trump.
Republished from TheMindUnleashed.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-03--Mysterious Drone Swarm Breached Secure Airspace Over Largest Nuclear Power Plant in US

A mysterious incident related to a serious breach of secure airspace over America ’ s largest nuclear power plant has been unearthed through Freedom of Information Act documents gained from the government .
It ’ s leading to new fears that America ’ s energy infrastructure is prone to attack and potentially being knocked offline , akin to the drone and missile attack which temporarily halted all Saudi oil exports last year at Aramco ’ s Abaqaiq oil processing facility .
Forbe ’ s presents the astonishing details as follows : The newly accessed Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( NRC ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drone-a-palooza ” as it involved swarms of inexpensive , likely off-the-shelf drones flying in large numbers over restricted airspace and near sensitive structures of Arizona ’ s Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant .
The documents conclude that it ’ s still as yet unknown who or what entity sent them or who was operating them during the illegal incursion .
“ Documents gained under the Freedom of Information Act show how a number of small drones flew around a restricted area at Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant on two successive nights last September @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Security forces watched , but were apparently helpless to act as the drones carried out their incursions before disappearing into the night .
Details of the event gives some clues as to just what they were doing , but who sent them remains a mystery.
” The FOIA documents underscore the incident was confusing and chaotic for security on the ground , as the security logs suggest : “ Officer noticed several drones ( 5 or 6 ) flying over the site .
The drones are circling the 3 unit site inside and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have flashing red and white rights and are estimated to be 200 to 300 hundred feet above the site .
It was reported the drones had spotlights on while approaching the site that they turned off when they entered the Security Owner Controlled Area .
Drones were first noticed at 2050 MST and are still over the site as of 2147 MST .
Security Posture was normal , which was changed to elevated when the drones were noticed .
The Licensee notified one of the NRC resident inspectors.
” And on a subsequent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 4 ) drones were observed flying beginning at 2051 MST [ on Sept. 30 , 2019 ] and continuing through the time of this report ( 2113 MST ) .
As occurred last night , the drones are flying in , through , and around the owner controlled area , the security owner controlled area , and the protected area .
Also , as last night , the drones are described as large with red and white flashing lights .
Spotlights have not been noted tonight .
The licensee has not changed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to monitor the drones .
As of 0355 EDT , no drones have been observed at the site since before 0020 MST .
LLEA [ local law enforcement agency ] surveyed the area and were unable to locate drones on the ground or anyone controlling the drones .
Guards at the high secure facility were without any ability to deter the drones overhead .
Subsequent media reports in the wake of the internal security memos going public say that county police were deployed to scour the area for the drone operator or operators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unsolved incident highlights that it appears America ’ s network of nuclear power sites essentially remain defenseless when it comes to drone incursions .
It appears that at least at the Palo Verde site , the facility was not equipped with drone detection gear or jamming technology which could have disabled the drones .
However , the sprawling facility is reportedly due to receive drone and small aircraft detection gear , but it ’ s unknown whether other sensitive facilities are also due for a security ungrade .
Some details on America ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Verde :

A mysterious incident related to a serious breach of secure airspace over America’s largest nuclear power plant has been unearthed through Freedom of Information Act documents gained from the government.
It’s leading to new fears that America’s energy infrastructure is prone to attack and potentially being knocked offline, akin to the drone and missile attack which temporarily halted all Saudi oil exports last year at Aramco’s Abaqaiq oil processing facility. Forbe’s presents the astonishing details as follows:
A tiny armada of between four and six unmarked drones flew over the Palo Verde Generating Station nuclear power plant in Arizona on the nights of September 29 and 30, 2019, with plant security proving unable to stop them and authorities still uncertain who was operating them or why.
The newly accessed Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) documents had called the incident a “drone-a-palooza” as it involved swarms of inexpensive, likely off-the-shelf drones flying in large numbers over restricted airspace and near sensitive structures of Arizona’s Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant.
The documents conclude that it’s still as yet unknown who or what entity sent them or who was operating them during the illegal incursion.
“Documents gained under the Freedom of Information Act show how a number of small drones flew around a restricted area at Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant on two successive nights last September,” Forbes writes further. “Security forces watched, but were apparently helpless to act as the drones carried out their incursions before disappearing into the night. Details of the event gives some clues as to just what they were doing, but who sent them remains a mystery.”
The FOIA documents underscore the incident was confusing and chaotic for security on the ground, as the security logs suggest:
“Officer noticed several drones (5 or 6) flying over the site. The drones are circling the 3 unit site inside and outside the Protected Area. The drones have flashing red and white rights and are estimated to be 200 to 300 hundred feet above the site. It was reported the drones had spotlights on while approaching the site that they turned off when they entered the Security Owner Controlled Area. Drones were first noticed at 2050 MST and are still over the site as of 2147 MST. Security Posture was normal, which was changed to elevated when the drones were noticed. The Licensee notified one of the NRC resident inspectors.”
And on a subsequent night, the logs indicate:
Four (4) drones were observed flying beginning at 2051 MST [on Sept. 30, 2019] and continuing through the time of this report (2113 MST). As occurred last night, the drones are flying in, through, and around the owner controlled area, the security owner controlled area, and the protected area. Also, as last night, the drones are described as large with red and white flashing lights. Spotlights have not been noted tonight. The licensee has not changed their security posture. The licensee continues to monitor the drones. As of 0355 EDT, no drones have been observed at the site since before 0020 MST. LLEA [local law enforcement agency] surveyed the area and were unable to locate drones on the ground or anyone controlling the drones.
Guards at the high secure facility were without any ability to deter the drones overhead. Subsequent media reports in the wake of the internal security memos going public say that county police were deployed to scour the area for the drone operator or operators but to no avail.
The whole unsolved incident highlights that it appears America’s network of nuclear power sites essentially remain defenseless when it comes to drone incursions.
It appears that at least at the Palo Verde site, the facility was not equipped with drone detection gear or jamming technology which could have disabled the drones. However, the sprawling facility is reportedly due to receive drone and small aircraft detection gear, but it’s unknown whether other sensitive facilities are also due for a security ungrade.
* * *
Some details on America’s largest nuclear power plant at Palo Verde:
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-02--“We’re Screwed”: The Worst Months for Both Renters and Landlords Still Lie Ahead

Rent has barely trickled in across the U.S. over the last couple months as the country continues to grapple with a decimated economy as a result of the coronavirus pandemic .
The only reason that many landlords have not gone belly-up alongside of their respective tenants has been due to the emergency “ relief ” provided by the government in the form of relentlessly printing , handing out and destroying the U.S. dollar .
Now , with further emergency funding still up in the air and eviction moratoriums about to expire , an ugly picture is starting to emerge for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact , Bloomberg predicts that the “ worst is yet to come.
” 33 % of renters didn ’ t make their full payment in the first week of July , a recent survey showed .
This means that 12 million renters could face eviction over the next four months .
In places like New York and Houston , more than 20 % of renters say they have “ no confidence ” in their ability to pay rent next month .
John Pollock , staff attorney at the Public Justice Center , commented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go back to the Great Depression to find the kind of numbers we ’ re looking at right now .
There ’ s almost no precedent for this , which is why it ’ s so scary.
” If he thinks the economic numbers are scary , he should look into how the Fed is trying to paper over them – that ’ s even scarier .
The pandemic caused layoffs across the country beginning in March and , since then , many U.S. citizens have been relying on the government dole , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to survive .
About 11 million renters spend at least half of their income just keeping a roof over their head , Bloomberg writes .
While stimulus measures – including $ 1,200 checks that went out months ago and eviction moratoriums – helped the problem , the government is still struggling to extend those measures .
Unemployment benefits , which were hiked by $ 600 per week during the pandemic , also remain an unknown .
One analysis says that landlords could wind up losing more than $ 22 billion in rent over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the economy .
Chuck Sheldon , who manages about 1,650 apartments in New Mexico has said that the $ 600 unemployment boost was a “ huge ” part of him still being able to collect most rents on time .
Mary Cunningham , vice president of the Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center at the Urban Institute , said : “ If Congress doesn ’ t do anything , I think we are in for a dark fall and winter.
” John Pawlowski , a senior analyst at real estate research firm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take .
He thinks there won ’ t be an “ immediate ” crash if unemployment benefits are not extended : “ People still need a place to live.
” Former bartender and 33 year old Brooke Martin disagrees .
She told Bloomberg that she can ’ t cover her $ 1,800 per month apartment on unemployment , after she pays off student loans and utilities .
She concluded : “ As of the end of the month , we ’ re screwed .
There ’ s just no two ways about it @ @

Rent has barely trickled in across the U.S. over the last couple months as the country continues to grapple with a decimated economy as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. The only reason that many landlords have not gone belly-up alongside of their respective tenants has been due to the emergency “relief” provided by the government in the form of relentlessly printing, handing out and destroying the U.S. dollar.
Now, with further emergency funding still up in the air and eviction moratoriums about to expire, an ugly picture is starting to emerge for both renters and their landlords. In fact, Bloomberg predicts that the “worst is yet to come.”
33% of renters didn’t make their full payment in the first week of July, a recent survey showed. This means that 12 million renters could face eviction over the next four months. In places like New York and Houston, more than 20% of renters say they have “no confidence” in their ability to pay rent next month.
John Pollock, staff attorney at the Public Justice Center, commented: “You’d have to go back to the Great Depression to find the kind of numbers we’re looking at right now. There’s almost no precedent for this, which is why it’s so scary.”
If he thinks the economic numbers are scary, he should look into how the Fed is trying to paper over them – that’s even scarier.
The pandemic caused layoffs across the country beginning in March and, since then, many U.S. citizens have been relying on the government dole, credit cards or digging into their savings to survive. About 11 million renters spend at least half of their income just keeping a roof over their head, Bloomberg writes.
While stimulus measures – including $1,200 checks that went out months ago and eviction moratoriums – helped the problem, the government is still struggling to extend those measures. Unemployment benefits, which were hiked by $600 per week during the pandemic, also remain an unknown.
One analysis says that landlords could wind up losing more than $22 billion in rent over the next four months as a result of the economy. Chuck Sheldon, who manages about 1,650 apartments in New Mexico has said that the $600 unemployment boost was a “huge” part of him still being able to collect most rents on time.
Mary Cunningham, vice president of the Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center at the Urban Institute, said: “If Congress doesn’t do anything, I think we are in for a dark fall and winter.”
John Pawlowski, a senior analyst at real estate research firm Green Street Advisors, has a different take. He thinks there won’t be an “immediate” crash if unemployment benefits are not extended: “People still need a place to live.”
Former bartender and 33 year old Brooke Martin disagrees. She told Bloomberg that she can’t cover her $1,800 per month apartment on unemployment, after she pays off student loans and utilities.
She concluded: “As of the end of the month, we’re screwed. There’s just no two ways about it.”
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-03--Records of Prince Andrew’s Location on Night He Allegedly Had Sex With Teenager Destroyed by Police

According to a former member of the Royal Guard who worked on Prince Andrew ’ s security detail , The London Metropolitan Police have destroyed evidence that could have revealed where Prince Andrew was on the night that he is accused of having sex with a teenager that was being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell .
The night in question is March 10th , 2011 , as well as the morning hours of March 11 .
Virginia Giuffre , who was known by the name Virginia Roberts at the time , says that she was taken to London @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have sex with Prince Andrew .
Giuffre says that she was just 17-years-old at the time and remembers being taken to the “ Tramp ” nightclub in London , as well as one of Maxwell ’ s homes in the city .
Andrew was questioned about Giuffre ’ s accusations during an interview with BBC , and he made numerous mistakes and fumbles that brought his credibility into question .
In the interview , Andrew vehemently denied knowing Giuffre and insisted that he was not at that nightclub on March 10th .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pizza Express location in Woking , for a party , but at least one other witness has come forward to corroborate Giuffre ’ s claim .
The witness says that she distinctly remembers seeing the prince at the nightclub on that evening .
There should be records of what the prince was doing on that evening , which would either exonerate him or prove that he was lying .
Members of the royal family are regularly accompanied by police guards in their day to day activities and there are records of where and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the very least a record of which officers worked on which day .
If these records were to be made available , the investigators could easily determine where Prince Andrew was on the night in question .
Initially , police refused to release this information to the media , insisting that revealing such sensitive information about the royal family could be a “ threat to national security.
” One of the guards who was assigned to work Andrew ’ s security detail on that night , remembers having an issue with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He says that Andrew ended up making his return to the palace very late that night , but wanted to obtain the records to confirm that this was the same night .
A few months ago , the former guard requested to see his shift records from his time working Andrew ’ s security detail .
He got no response for months , but was eventually contacted by a caseworker with the London Metropolitan Police .
The caseworker told him that the records were destroyed , and said that it is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ records for two years , which is a bit of a strange policy in the computer age where files don ’ t take up much space .
“ I am very disappointed .
Why on earth did it take nearly five months to respond with such a non-informative answer ?
I ’ m also surprised to discover that any records regarding the Royal family and their police protection are destroyed , much less after just two years , ” the guard told the Daily Mail .

According to a former member of the Royal Guard who worked on Prince Andrew’s security detail, The London Metropolitan Police have destroyed evidence that could have revealed where Prince Andrew was on the night that he is accused of having sex with a teenager that was being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
The night in question is March 10th, 2011, as well as the morning hours of March 11. Virginia Giuffre, who was known by the name Virginia Roberts at the time, says that she was taken to London by Epstein and Maxwell and was expected to have sex with Prince Andrew.
Giuffre says that she was just 17-years-old at the time and remembers being taken to the “Tramp” nightclub in London, as well as one of Maxwell’s homes in the city.
Andrew was questioned about Giuffre’s accusations during an interview with BBC, and he made numerous mistakes and fumbles that brought his credibility into question.
In the interview, Andrew vehemently denied knowing Giuffre and insisted that he was not at that nightclub on March 10th.
He claimed that he was at a Pizza Express location in Woking, for a party, but at least one other witness has come forward to corroborate Giuffre’s claim. The witness says that she distinctly remembers seeing the prince at the nightclub on that evening.
There should be records of what the prince was doing on that evening, which would either exonerate him or prove that he was lying. Members of the royal family are regularly accompanied by police guards in their day to day activities and there are records of where and when the officers were sent, or at the very least a record of which officers worked on which day.
If these records were to be made available, the investigators could easily determine where Prince Andrew was on the night in question. Initially, police refused to release this information to the media, insisting that revealing such sensitive information about the royal family could be a “threat to national security.”
One of the guards who was assigned to work Andrew’s security detail on that night, remembers having an issue with the prince when he returned to Buckingham Palace.
He says that Andrew ended up making his return to the palace very late that night, but wanted to obtain the records to confirm that this was the same night.
A few months ago, the former guard requested to see his shift records from his time working Andrew’s security detail. He got no response for months, but was eventually contacted by a caseworker with the London Metropolitan Police.
The caseworker told him that the records were destroyed, and said that it is the agency’s policy to only keep records for two years, which is a bit of a strange policy in the computer age where files don’t take up much space.
“I am very disappointed. Why on earth did it take nearly five months to respond with such a non-informative answer? I’m also surprised to discover that any records regarding the Royal family and their police protection are destroyed, much less after just two years,” the guard told the Daily Mail.
Republished from TheMindUnleashed.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-04--Photos of Stephen Hawking on Epstein’s Island Subject of New Court Order

The document releases that have been taking place in relation to the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are comprised of testimonies and other evidence that was introduced in a previous civil lawsuit that was filed against Maxwell by Virginia Giuffre , one of Epstein ’ s most outspoken victims .
Most of the evidence that was presented during the civil trial was sealed as a part of a protection order and as a condition of the settlement , which is why much of the information revealed during the trial was not made public when the case was settled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did leak to the press during the civil case though , including details about events that Epstein hosted with affluent scientists , including Stephen Hawking .
In January of 2015 , a few photos of Stephen Hawking on Epstein ’ s private island surfaced in the media .
The photos are believed to be from the Giuffre vs Maxwell civil case .
One of the photos shows the famous physicist at a barbecue on the island , while another photo shows him on a submarine tour off the coast of the island .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have the submarine modified for the professor ’ s wheelchair , because he had never been underwater before .
The photos were reportedly taken in March of 2006 , which is shortly before Epstein was first charged with sex crimes against minors .
Epstein is said to have invited 21 internationally-renowned scientists , including Hawking , to the island for a conference that he funded .
The conference was held at a Ritz-Carlton hotel on the neighboring St. James Island , but the attendees were invited back to Epstein ’ s private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information that is already publicly available there is no way to know for sure if Hawking was aware of Epstein ’ s crimes or if he participated in them during his time on the island , but as more documents from the civil trial are unsealed , it is possible that more details will come to light .
NewsWeek reported that Stephen Hawking ’ s name appeared in a list of individuals who were seen in photos and videos on the island with Giuffre .
Attorneys recently sent Giuffre a request for photo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including Stephen Hawking , Ghislaine Maxwell , Alan Dershowitz , Jeffrey Epstein , Prince Andrew , Ron Eppinger , Bill Clinton , and Al Gore .
After Giuffre went public with her accusations in 2010 , she faced a storm of very public denials and attacks from Epstein ’ s associates which lasted for years .
As a result , Giuffre filed defamation lawsuits against those who attacked her in the media .
The lawsuit against Maxwell was settled in June of 2017 , but a suit against Alan Dershowitz is still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fought to keep the details of the civil trial sealed , but their requests were denied by a judge who determined that a criminal case takes precedent over a civil case and ordered the documents to be unsealed .
Similar revelations are expected to come as the criminal trial approaches .

The document releases that have been taking place in relation to the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are comprised of testimonies and other evidence that was introduced in a previous civil lawsuit that was filed against Maxwell by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most outspoken victims.
Most of the evidence that was presented during the civil trial was sealed as a part of a protection order and as a condition of the settlement, which is why much of the information revealed during the trial was not made public when the case was settled in June of 2017.
Some details did leak to the press during the civil case though, including details about events that Epstein hosted with affluent scientists, including Stephen Hawking. In January of 2015, a few photos of Stephen Hawking on Epstein’s private island surfaced in the media. The photos are believed to be from the Giuffre vs Maxwell civil case.
One of the photos shows the famous physicist at a barbecue on the island, while another photo shows him on a submarine tour off the coast of the island. According to the Telegraph, Epstein paid to have the submarine modified for the professor’s wheelchair, because he had never been underwater before.
The photos were reportedly taken in March of 2006, which is shortly before Epstein was first charged with sex crimes against minors.
Epstein is said to have invited 21 internationally-renowned scientists, including Hawking, to the island for a conference that he funded. The conference was held at a Ritz-Carlton hotel on the neighboring St. James Island, but the attendees were invited back to Epstein’s private island as well.
Judging from the information that is already publicly available there is no way to know for sure if Hawking was aware of Epstein’s crimes or if he participated in them during his time on the island, but as more documents from the civil trial are unsealed, it is possible that more details will come to light.
NewsWeek reported that Stephen Hawking’s name appeared in a list of individuals who were seen in photos and videos on the island with Giuffre. Attorneys recently sent Giuffre a request for photo and video evidence with high profile figures, including Stephen Hawking, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Ron Eppinger, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore.
After Giuffre went public with her accusations in 2010, she faced a storm of very public denials and attacks from Epstein’s associates which lasted for years.
As a result, Giuffre filed defamation lawsuits against those who attacked her in the media. The lawsuit against Maxwell was settled in June of 2017, but a suit against Alan Dershowitz is still ongoing.
Maxwell’s attorneys have fought to keep the details of the civil trial sealed, but their requests were denied by a judge who determined that a criminal case takes precedent over a civil case and ordered the documents to be unsealed. Similar revelations are expected to come as the criminal trial approaches.
Republished from TheMindUnleashed.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-04--Trump Suggests Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself

In this video , we break down Donald Trump ’ s comments on the death of Jeffrey Epstein , as @ @ @ @ @ news .
OH YEAH , since we are not corporate or government owned help us @ @ @ @ @ ALSO SUPPORT US ON

In this video, we break down Donald Trump’s comments on the death of Jeffrey Epstein, as well as other major geopolitical news.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.


wearechange--2020-08-05--Just When You Thought It Couldn’t Get More Orwellian

In this video , we cover the new lockdown in New York City as well as science being for sale @ @ @ @ @ and not working globallly in dealing with the pandemic .
OH YEAH , since we @ @ @ @ @ owned help us out here .
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT US ON

In this video, we cover the new lockdown in New York City as well as science being for sale and what’s working and not working globallly in dealing with the pandemic.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.


wearechange--2020-08-05--Nearly 300,000 People Left Homeless in Beirut After Massive Explosion

After Tuesday ’ s deadly blast in Beirut which Lebanon ’ s PM linked to 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate which had unsafely sat in storage on the port going back to 2013 , the governor of Beirut has estimated the damage is so pervasive throughout the city as to have left hundreds of thousands homeless .
During a press conference the governor of Lebanon Marwan Abboud described while fighting back tears during a live press briefing that the two explosions that left 100 dead and over 4,000 injured unleashed at least three billion dollars in damage , devastating up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ took a tour of Beirut , the damage can amount to between three and five billion dollars , ” Abboud estimated .
And he said that it ’ s likely up to 300,000 residents of the city were left homeless , given in many cases entire walls of buildings were ripped out by the seismic blast shockwave .
“ Maybe more , ” Abboud added while discussion the billions in damage , which also crucially took out the entirety of the city ’ s economically vital port .
The blast force is being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one-fifth the size of Hiroshima .
Lebanon ’ s president has declared a two week state of emergency and has put port authority officials under house arrest while pending an investigation .
It ’ s clear from widely shared footage showing multiple angles of the enormous blast , the biggest in Lebanon ’ s history , that buildings and homes within the immediate few kilometres of the epicenter were leveled , and across almost the entirety of the capital city windows were shattered , balconies blown off , and sides of buildings damaged @

After Tuesday’s deadly blast in Beirut which Lebanon’s PM linked to 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate which had unsafely sat in storage on the port going back to 2013, the governor of Beirut has estimated the damage is so pervasive throughout the city as to have left hundreds of thousands homeless.
During a press conference the governor of Lebanon Marwan Abboud described while fighting back tears during a live press briefing that the two explosions that left 100 dead and over 4,000 injured unleashed at least three billion dollars in damage, devastating up to half the city.
“I took a tour of Beirut, the damage can amount to between three and five billion dollars,” Abboud estimated. And he said that it’s likely up to 300,000 residents of the city were left homeless, given in many cases entire walls of buildings were ripped out by the seismic blast shockwave.
Regional media reported of his comments:
“Almost half of Beirut is destroyed or damaged,” he estimated, with 250,000 to 300,000 people finding themselves homeless.
“Maybe more,” Abboud added while discussion the billions in damage, which also crucially took out the entirety of the city’s economically vital port.
Before and after images from the #explosion that happened in #Beirut, #Lebanon on August 4, 2020. Before image from June 2020 and after image from today, August 5, 2020. More imagery showing the devastation will follow. pic.twitter.com/dfj4ItyTXL — Maxar Technologies (@Maxar) August 5, 2020
The blast force is being widely estimated in international reports as being one-fifth the size of Hiroshima.
Lebanon’s president has declared a two week state of emergency and has put port authority officials under house arrest while pending an investigation.
Video: Footage posted on social media shows a close-up view of the warehouse area that exploded in Beirut, along with the fire and smaller blasts that led up to the larger explosion. pic.twitter.com/FqyTiJkFUj — Evan Kohlmann (@IntelTweet) August 4, 2020
It’s clear from widely shared footage showing multiple angles of the enormous blast, the biggest in Lebanon’s history, that buildings and homes within the immediate few kilometres of the epicenter were leveled, and across almost the entirety of the capital city windows were shattered, balconies blown off, and sides of buildings damaged.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission