wearechange--2020-08-12--Air Force Helicopter Shot at From Ground Over Virginia, Injuring Crew

In an almost unheard of and unprecedented scenario , an Air Force helicopter was forced to make an emergency landing in Manassas , Virginia after someone shot at the helicopter from the ground .
The incident happened Monday , and military sources are now revealing the dangerous incident , which actually injured a member of the crew .
McClatchy details that a UH-1N Huey helicopter which flew out of Joint Base Andrews — where Marine helicopters which routinely fly members of Congress as well as the president are based ( in the president ’ s case , Marine One , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ housed there ) — was on a routine training flight after an unknown individual or individuals fired on it from the ground .
McClatchy describes the following based on airport and security statements : Officials at Manassas Regional Airport said they received a call at about 12:20 p.m. alerting them that “ a military helicopter was inbound and that paramedics were on the way , ” said airport operations officer Richard Allabaugh .
A second airport official said the injured Air Force crew member was taken to a local facility for treatment .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ an investigation was launched into the shooting incident .
The FBI immediately dispatched special agents to the area to investigate after the Huey landed at Manassas Regional Airport .
“ The FBI Washington Field Office is working jointly with our law enforcement partners , including the Air Force Office of Special Investigations , to determine the circumstances surrounding the incident .
One individual in the helicopter sustained a non-threatening injury , for which he was treated and subsequently released from the hospital , ” the FBI said in a statement .
Federal agents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s help in identifying who shot at the helicopter .
The type of ammunition used has not been revealed , nor the extent of the crew member ’ s injuries , however they were reported as non-life threatening .

In an almost unheard of and unprecedented scenario, an Air Force helicopter was forced to make an emergency landing in Manassas, Virginia after someone shot at the helicopter from the ground.
The incident happened Monday, and military sources are now revealing the dangerous incident, which actually injured a member of the crew.
McClatchy details that a UH-1N Huey helicopter which flew out of Joint Base Andrews — where Marine helicopters which routinely fly members of Congress as well as the president are based (in the president’s case, Marine One, as well as Air Force One are housed there) — was on a routine training flight after an unknown individual or individuals fired on it from the ground.
McClatchy describes the following based on airport and security statements:
Officials at Manassas Regional Airport said they received a call at about 12:20 p.m. alerting them that “a military helicopter was inbound and that paramedics were on the way,” said airport operations officer Richard Allabaugh. A second airport official said the injured Air Force crew member was taken to a local facility for treatment. The helicopter remained at the airport as an investigation was launched into the shooting incident.
The FBI immediately dispatched special agents to the area to investigate after the Huey landed at Manassas Regional Airport.
“The FBI Washington Field Office is working jointly with our law enforcement partners, including the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, to determine the circumstances surrounding the incident. One individual in the helicopter sustained a non-threatening injury, for which he was treated and subsequently released from the hospital,” the FBI said in a statement.
Federal agents are also asking for the public’s help in identifying who shot at the helicopter.
The type of ammunition used has not been revealed, nor the extent of the crew member’s injuries, however they were reported as non-life threatening.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-13--Groundbreaking Study Shows Organic Diets Drastically Lower Glyphosate Levels in the Body

An environmental organization focused on achieving a healthier and more just world is celebrating the publication Tuesday of a groundbreaking study that found an organic diet radically decreases levels of the toxic herbicide glyphosate in the body .
The study—titled Organic Diet Intervention Significantly Reduces Urinary Glyphosate Levels in U.S. Children and Adults—was published in the journal Environmental Research and co-authored by Kendra Klein , a senior staff scientist at Friends of the Earth .
In what FOE described as an unprecedented study to examine how an organic diet affects glyphosate intake , Klein and her co-authors looked at glyphosate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ families .
The individuals studied spent six days on a non-organic diet and six days on an organic diet .
In this time period , glyphosate levels in participants ’ bodies decreased an average of 70 % .
“ We all have the right to food that is free of toxic pesticides , ” said Klein , “ but our federal regulatory system is broken and is not protecting us .
We urgently need our elected leaders to make healthy organic food the norm for everyone by passing policies that support farmers to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Glyphosate is the main ingredient in Roundup , an herbicide used as on wheat , corn , soy , canola , cotton , oats , beans , and in gardening and landscaping .
It was introduced in the 1990s and , since then , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has allowed the dietary limit of residue exposure to glyphosate to be increased up to 300 times more than previous foods , despite previous research showing its harmful effects .
The chemical was flagged as a possible cause of cancer as early as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human carcinogen by the World Health Organization in 2015 .
Over time , it has been linked to human health conditions like kidney disease , hormone disruption , and shortened pregnancy .
About 280 million pounds of glyphosate is sprayed annually in the U.S. “ The government has turned a blind eye for decades when it comes to monitoring glyphosate—failing to test for it on food and in our bodies , ” Klein and Anna Lappé , co-director of Real Food Media , wrote Tuesday in an op-ed for The Guardian .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plaintiffs ’ cancer with exposure to the use of Roundup , leading to an $ 180 million payout in damages from Bayer , the company that now owns Roundup after merging with Monsanto in 2018 .
According to Friends of the Earth , Bayer negotiated another settlement of $ 10 billion in the summer of 2020 and still has 30,000 more similar cases pending .
In July , the Environmental Working Group ( EWG ) released an analysis of lab testing that showed glyphosate in 90 % of non-organic hummus and chickpea samples @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the chemical in popular breakfast cereals .
In animal studies , glyphosate has been shown to cause DNA damage , decreased sperm function , and fatty liver disease .
It is also considered to be one of the causes of monarch butterfly and bee populations declining .
In a statement Wednesday about Klein ’ s study , EWG Toxicologist Alexis Temkin noted that the “ often-repeated claims by chemical agriculture and big food companies that there isn ’ t much difference between conventional and organic foods is wildly inaccurate , and this study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The levels of toxic crop chemicals like glyphosate that contaminate a wide swath of conventional foods are a main pathway of exposure for most adults and children , ” said Temkin .
“ The only way to dramatically reduce all Americans ’ exposure to this toxic weedkiller is for the Environmental Protection Agency to ban uses of the herbicide that lead to high levels in foods people eat.
” Another important aspect of the new study : Children have significantly higher levels of exposure to glyphosate—about five times higher than the average level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this kind of chemical in their body will harm them , ” Sharyle Patton , director of Commonweal Biomonitoring Resource Center and a study author , told Environmental Health News .
“ It ’ s a tragedy .
”

An environmental organization focused on achieving a healthier and more just world is celebrating the publication Tuesday of a groundbreaking study that found an organic diet radically decreases levels of the toxic herbicide glyphosate in the body.
The study—titled Organic Diet Intervention Significantly Reduces Urinary Glyphosate Levels in U.S. Children and Adults—was published in the journal Environmental Research and co-authored by Kendra Klein, a senior staff scientist at Friends of the Earth.
In what FOE described as an unprecedented study to examine how an organic diet affects glyphosate intake, Klein and her co-authors looked at glyphosate levels in urine samples from four different families. The individuals studied spent six days on a non-organic diet and six days on an organic diet. In this time period, glyphosate levels in participants’ bodies decreased an average of 70%.
“We all have the right to food that is free of toxic pesticides,” said Klein, “but our federal regulatory system is broken and is not protecting us. We urgently need our elected leaders to make healthy organic food the norm for everyone by passing policies that support farmers to shift from pesticide-intensive to organic farming.”
Glyphosate is the main ingredient in Roundup, an herbicide used as on wheat, corn, soy, canola, cotton, oats, beans, and in gardening and landscaping. It was introduced in the 1990s and, since then, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has allowed the dietary limit of residue exposure to glyphosate to be increased up to 300 times more than previous foods, despite previous research showing its harmful effects.
The chemical was flagged as a possible cause of cancer as early as the 1980s and was classified as a likely human carcinogen by the World Health Organization in 2015. Over time, it has been linked to human health conditions like kidney disease, hormone disruption, and shortened pregnancy. About 280 million pounds of glyphosate is sprayed annually in the U.S.
“The government has turned a blind eye for decades when it comes to monitoring glyphosate—failing to test for it on food and in our bodies,” Klein and Anna Lappé, co-director of Real Food Media, wrote Tuesday in an op-ed for The Guardian.
A string of court cases in 2019 linked plaintiffs’ cancer with exposure to the use of Roundup, leading to an $180 million payout in damages from Bayer, the company that now owns Roundup after merging with Monsanto in 2018. According to Friends of the Earth, Bayer negotiated another settlement of $10 billion in the summer of 2020 and still has 30,000 more similar cases pending.
In July, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) released an analysis of lab testing that showed glyphosate in 90% of non-organic hummus and chickpea samples. Similar reports from the group found the chemical in popular breakfast cereals.
In animal studies, glyphosate has been shown to cause DNA damage, decreased sperm function, and fatty liver disease. It is also considered to be one of the causes of monarch butterfly and bee populations declining.
In a statement Wednesday about Klein’s study, EWG Toxicologist Alexis Temkin noted that the “often-repeated claims by chemical agriculture and big food companies that there isn’t much difference between conventional and organic foods is wildly inaccurate, and this study is further proof of it.”
“The levels of toxic crop chemicals like glyphosate that contaminate a wide swath of conventional foods are a main pathway of exposure for most adults and children,” said Temkin. “The only way to dramatically reduce all Americans’ exposure to this toxic weedkiller is for the Environmental Protection Agency to ban uses of the herbicide that lead to high levels in foods people eat.”
Another important aspect of the new study: Children have significantly higher levels of exposure to glyphosate—about five times higher than the average level in adults.
“Growing up with this kind of chemical in their body will harm them,” Sharyle Patton, director of Commonweal Biomonitoring Resource Center and a study author, told Environmental Health News. “It’s a tragedy.”
Republished from CommonDreams.org under Creative Commons


wearechange--2020-08-13--BEWARE: Desperate Nations Are Making Desperate Moves Right Now!

In this geopolitical news update , we explain what you need to know about the Israel-UAE deal , aggressive moves @ @ @ @ @ how the global economic downturn contributes to desperate nations clashing right now .
OH YEAH @ @ @ @ @ corporate or government owned help us out here .
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT US ON

In this geopolitical news update, we explain what you need to know about the Israel-UAE deal, aggressive moves by Turkey and China and how the global economic downturn contributes to desperate nations clashing right now.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.


wearechange--2020-08-14--No Matter How You Feel About Trump, a Pardon for Snowden Would Be a Major Win

After President Donald Trump suggested in an interview published Thursday night by the New York Post that he is open to pardoning Edward Snowden , civil liberties advocates issued a fresh wave of calls urging the president to follow through and allow the American whistleblower to return to the United States .
The U.S.-based Freedom of the Press Foundation—for which Snowden serves as board president—tweeted a link to the Post report along with a “ long and varied ” list of individuals who have demanded a presidential pardon for Snowden , the NSA whistleblower who famously exposed U.S. government mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The ACLU on Friday also responded to the report on Twitter , sharing a Los Angeles Times op-ed from September 2016 that was authored by the group ’ s executive director Anthony Romero .
He argued that “ cases like Edward Snowden ’ s are precisely the reason the president ’ s constitutional pardon power exists.
” According to the Post , Trump polled his aides in the Oval Office on Thursday about whether he should allow Snowden to return from Russia—where the former intelligence contractor has lived in exile since 2013—without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. , and the president said he was open to it .
“ There are a lot of people that think that he is not being treated fairly .
I mean , I hear that , ” Trump said of Snowden .
As the Post reported : Trump ’ s comments reflect a remarkable softening in his views about the man he once deemed a “ traitor ” worthy of execution .
Republican lawmakers and the Justice Department ’ s inspector general recently highlighted misuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adviser Carter Page .
“ Snowden is one of the people they talk about .
They talk about numerous people , but he is certainly one of the people that they do talk about , ” Trump said on Thursday , before turning to his aides .
“ I guess the DOJ is looking to extradite him right now ?
…It ’ s certainly something I could look at .
Many people are on his side , I will say that .
I don ’ t know him , never met him .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ How do you feel about that , Snowden ?
Haven ’ t heard the name in a long time , ” Trump reportedly asked his staff .
“ I ’ ve heard it both ways .
From traitor to he ’ s being , you know , persecuted .
I ’ ve heard it both ways.
” Snowden pointed out in a Friday tweet that “ the last time we heard a White House considering a pardon was 2016 , when the very same attorney general who once charged me conceded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in exposing the NSA ’ s unconstitutional system of mass surveillance had been ‘ a public service . '
” That comment came from Eric Holder during a May 2016 interview with David Alexrod .
Holder , who also called Snowden ’ s actions “ inappropriate and illegal , ” ran the Justice Department under President Barack Obama in 2013 , when Snowden was charged with theft of government property and violating the Espionage Act .
Journalist Matt Taibbi tweeted in response to Snowden that the fact that the whistleblower “ has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the illegal surveillance program he exposed have not only gone unpunished , but have been feted and given high-profile media jobs , is an ongoing outrage.
” Even some right-wing politicians joined the calls for Trump to pardon Snowden .
Michigan Congressman Justin Amash—who became an Independent and then a Libertarian after leaving the Republican Party last summer—tweeted his support for the whistleblower Friday : Rep. Thomas Massie ( R-Ky. ) also said in a series of tweets Friday that the president should pardon Snowden—prompting a response from Cenk Uyger of The Young @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Do you believe in miracles ?
” The Intercept ‘ s Glenn Greenwald , who was was among the first journalists to report on leaked documents from Snowden , wrote in a long thread of tweets Friday that Trump talking about a pardon for Snowden and Massie expressing his support for one “ should not obscure that this is not a right-wing view.
” Greenwald also shared the ideologically diverse list of signatories to the Stand with Snowden pledge and said it is “ good to see ” that Trump is “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ACLU and the New York Times , among others , that Snowden is a heroic whistleblower .
”

After President Donald Trump suggested in an interview published Thursday night by the New York Post that he is open to pardoning Edward Snowden, civil liberties advocates issued a fresh wave of calls urging the president to follow through and allow the American whistleblower to return to the United States.
The U.S.-based Freedom of the Press Foundation—for which Snowden serves as board president—tweeted a link to the Post report along with a “long and varied” list of individuals who have demanded a presidential pardon for Snowden, the NSA whistleblower who famously exposed U.S. government mass surveillance by leaking classified materials in 2013.
The list of people who have called for @Snowden to be pardoned is long and varied. No matter your feelings on Trump, a Snowden pardon would be a major win for those who care about fighting back against mass surveillance in the digital age. https://t.co/pmgucTKr8Y — Freedom of the Press (@FreedomofPress) August 14, 2020
The ACLU on Friday also responded to the report on Twitter, sharing a Los Angeles Times op-ed from September 2016 that was authored by the group’s executive director Anthony Romero. He argued that “cases like Edward Snowden’s are precisely the reason the president’s constitutional pardon power exists.”
Edward Snowden is a patriot. Our democracy is better off because of him. As we said four years ago, the president should pardon him.https://t.co/PAsp56QDu4 — ACLU (@ACLU) August 14, 2020
According to the Post, Trump polled his aides in the Oval Office on Thursday about whether he should allow Snowden to return from Russia—where the former intelligence contractor has lived in exile since 2013—without the risk of being imprisoned in the U.S., and the president said he was open to it.
“There are a lot of people that think that he is not being treated fairly. I mean, I hear that,” Trump said of Snowden. As the Post reported:
Trump’s comments reflect a remarkable softening in his views about the man he once deemed a “traitor” worthy of execution. Republican lawmakers and the Justice Department’s inspector general recently highlighted misuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the secret FISA court to surveil former Trump adviser Carter Page. “Snowden is one of the people they talk about. They talk about numerous people, but he is certainly one of the people that they do talk about,” Trump said on Thursday, before turning to his aides. “I guess the DOJ is looking to extradite him right now? …It’s certainly something I could look at. Many people are on his side, I will say that. I don’t know him, never met him. But many people are on his side.”
“How do you feel about that, Snowden? Haven’t heard the name in a long time,” Trump reportedly asked his staff. “I’ve heard it both ways. From traitor to he’s being, you know, persecuted. I’ve heard it both ways.”
Snowden pointed out in a Friday tweet that “the last time we heard a White House considering a pardon was 2016, when the very same attorney general who once charged me conceded that, on balance, my work in exposing the NSA’s unconstitutional system of mass surveillance had been ‘a public service.'”
That comment came from Eric Holder during a May 2016 interview with David Alexrod. Holder, who also called Snowden’s actions “inappropriate and illegal,” ran the Justice Department under President Barack Obama in 2013, when Snowden was charged with theft of government property and violating the Espionage Act.
Journalist Matt Taibbi tweeted in response to Snowden that the fact that the whistleblower “has been in permanent exile while the creators/defenders of the illegal surveillance program he exposed have not only gone unpunished, but have been feted and given high-profile media jobs, is an ongoing outrage.”
Even some right-wing politicians joined the calls for Trump to pardon Snowden. Michigan Congressman Justin Amash—who became an Independent and then a Libertarian after leaving the Republican Party last summer—tweeted his support for the whistleblower Friday:
Edward @Snowden is a whistleblower who exposed unconstitutional surveillance practices that violated the rights of millions. He deserves the opportunity to return to the United States and receive a pardon as part of a fair process that examines his actions. https://t.co/JqVccAYd41 — Justin Amash (@justinamash) August 14, 2020
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) also said in a series of tweets Friday that the president should pardon Snowden—prompting a response from Cenk Uyger of The Young Turks: “Wow. I agree. Do you believe in miracles?”
Wow. I agree. Do you believe in miracles? The more you take money out of the equation, the more the left and right-wing can agree. We should end Snowden's absurd exile. He's an American hero. https://t.co/pkYgIrRicQ — Cenk Uygur (@cenkuygur) August 14, 2020
The Intercept‘s Glenn Greenwald, who was was among the first journalists to report on leaked documents from Snowden, wrote in a long thread of tweets Friday that Trump talking about a pardon for Snowden and Massie expressing his support for one “should not obscure that this is not a right-wing view.”
Praise for Snowden’s heoric whistleblowing has also come from @BernieSanders, @CornelWest, Noam Chomsky and Washington Post media reporter @Sulliview: pic.twitter.com/VbhRoIvyqr — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) August 14, 2020
And now conservatives see how easily NSA’s mass surveillance system, and the entire intelligence community apparatus, can be weaponized & abused for improper ends. What Snowden showed the world was crucial for it to know. He’s spent 7 years in exile. He should be pardoned. — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) August 14, 2020
Greenwald also shared the ideologically diverse list of signatories to the Stand with Snowden pledge and said it is “good to see” that Trump is “now open to the view of the ACLU and the New York Times, among others, that Snowden is a heroic whistleblower.”
Republished from CommonDreams.org under Creative Commons


wearechange--2020-08-14--Putin Sees US and Iran Headed Toward War, Proposes Urgent World Summit to Stop It

Russia thinks war between the US and Iran is on the horizon , and is proposing steps to stop it : But it ’ s hard to know what could be done at this point .
Not only did the Trump administration void the 2015 nuclear deal ( JCPOA ) , but long-standing hawks like Pompeo have sought to ramp up sanctions at every turn .
The situation has been stalemated , with Tehran demanding easing of sanctions or erasure altogether as a condition for fresh talks , but with the White House alternately saying Iran has to first abandon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which the US says is actually for nuclear weapons ) and its ballistic missile program .
But if Gaddafi ’ s fate is anything to go by ( who abandoned his WMD program in the early 2000s and was “ brought in from the cold ” as they say – only to be overthrown by US-NATO military intervention and summarily executed in the street years later ) , the view from Tehran is that any ‘ deal-making ’ with the United States is impossible .
“ The issue is urgent , ” Putin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He explained the alternative remains “ only further escalation of tensions , increasing risk of conflict – such a scenario must be avoided.
” When asked about Putin ’ s proposal and a press briefing on Friday , President Trump responded : “ I hear there ’ s something , but I haven ’ t been told of it yet.
” However , given Iran essentially sees the US as in a state of war with the Islamic Republic – especially given the January assassination of IRGC Quds Force chief Qassem Soleimani @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for any UN deconfliction meeting to succeed .

Russia thinks war between the US and Iran is on the horizon, and is proposing steps to stop it:
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday proposed a video summit with the United States, Britain, France, China, Germany and Iran in a bid to avoid “confrontation and escalation” at the United Nations, where Washington is trying to extend an arms embargo on Tehran, reports Reuters.
But it’s hard to know what could be done at this point. Not only did the Trump administration void the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA), but long-standing hawks like Pompeo have sought to ramp up sanctions at every turn.
The situation has been stalemated, with Tehran demanding easing of sanctions or erasure altogether as a condition for fresh talks, but with the White House alternately saying Iran has to first abandon all development related to nuclear power (which the US says is actually for nuclear weapons) and its ballistic missile program.
But if Gaddafi’s fate is anything to go by (who abandoned his WMD program in the early 2000s and was “brought in from the cold” as they say – only to be overthrown by US-NATO military intervention and summarily executed in the street years later), the view from Tehran is that any ‘deal-making’ with the United States is impossible.
“The issue is urgent,” Putin said of his plan in Friday comments. He explained the alternative remains “only further escalation of tensions, increasing risk of conflict – such a scenario must be avoided.”
When asked about Putin’s proposal and a press briefing on Friday, President Trump responded: “I hear there’s something, but I haven’t been told of it yet.”
However, given Iran essentially sees the US as in a state of war with the Islamic Republic – especially given the January assassination of IRGC Quds Force chief Qassem Soleimani, it will likely less than optimistic for any UN deconfliction meeting to succeed.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-14--Discussion of Wikileaks or Any “Hacked Information” is Now Banned on YouTube

Social media giant YouTube announced yesterday a host of new measures it says are aimed at preventing any interference in the upcoming presidential elections .
Chief among the list it wrote on its blog , is “ removing content that contains hacked information , the disclosure of which may interfere with democratic processes , such as elections and censuses.
” An example it gives , would be deleting “ videos that contain hacked information about a political candidate.
” It also promised to “ raise up authoritative voices ” when it comes to current events and politics by changing its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and “ reduce the spread of harmful misinformation and borderline content.
” Example channels that produce authoritative content , it tells readers , includes Fox News and CNN .
It also noted it would expand information panels underneath videos .
There are a number of reasons this new policy could concern users of its platform .
Firstly , the great majority of leaked information — the lifeblood of investigative journalism — is anonymous .
Often , like in the cases of Edward Snowden , Chelsea Manning or Reality Winner , whistleblowers face serious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documents exposing government or corporate malfeasance .
But without a name to go with a document , the difference between leaked data and hacked data is impossible to define .
Thus , powerful people and organizations could claim data was hacked , rather than leaked , and simply block all discussion of the matter on the platform .
Hearing the news , some feared already existing content from investigative journalists would be subject to removal under the new guidelines .
YouTube ’ s choice of Fox News and CNN as reliable sources might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ According to the latest Reuters Institute Digital News Report , fewer than half of all Americans trust the two networks ( Fox at 42 percent and CNN at 47 percent ) .
And a new study from Gallup/Knight Foundation finds that fewer than a third of the country has a favorable view of the media more generally , including only 19 percent of those under thirty ( YouTube ’ s prime demographic ) .
Many go to the platform precisely because it offers alternative and more diverse opinions to corporate-dominated radio , print @ @ @ @ @ @ @ funneling them back towards those same sources .
The 2016 presidential election was colored by Wikileaks ’ release of the Podesta emails , discussion of which would be banned under YouTube ’ s new rules .
The Hillary Clinton campaign alleges the emails were hacked from Podesta ’ s computer .
The published communications , the authenticity of which is not in doubt , informed the country of the machinations of the Democratic Party , how it tipped the electoral scales in favor of Clinton and against Bernie Sanders in the primary , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she had a “ public ” and a “ private ” position on regulation , insinuating she was lying to the nation , how representatives of Qatar wanted to meet with her husband Bill for “ five minutes ” to present him with a $ 1 million check for his birthday , and how her own staff held her in contempt .
The emails , Clinton contends , swung the election from her to Trump .
If this is the case , the decision to ban all discussion of them would have fundamentally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s actions seem drastic , the Australian state of Queensland introduced laws yesterday that made it illegal to publish allegations of corruption against any politician during election season .
Those found guilty would be punished with a six-month jail sentence and a fine of nearly U.S. $ 5,000 .
After a public outcry , the law was overturned after only 24 hours .
While misinformation online is a problem , there exist other , more serious threats to electoral integrity .
President Trump , who said that Republicans would never get into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fox Business this week that he is actively withholding funds from the U.S .
Postal Service in order to undermine the election to his benefit .
“ They need that money in order to make the Post Office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots , ” he said .
“ But if they don ’ t get those two items , that means you can ’ t have universal mail-in voting , because they ’ re not equipped to have it.
” Add decades of gerrymandering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has seen over 1,200 polling stations across the South , primarily in black neighborhoods , and Trump might be able to overcome his polling deficit and beat Biden .
YouTube ’ s decision to ban discussion of hacked information on its platform is unlikely to significantly improve political discourse or election integrity in the United States .
It will , however , continue to tilt the balance in favor of established corporate-funded outlets , to the detriment of new , alternative voices .

Social media giant YouTube announced yesterday a host of new measures it says are aimed at preventing any interference in the upcoming presidential elections. Chief among the list it wrote on its blog, is “removing content that contains hacked information, the disclosure of which may interfere with democratic processes, such as elections and censuses.” An example it gives, would be deleting “videos that contain hacked information about a political candidate.”
It also promised to “raise up authoritative voices” when it comes to current events and politics by changing its algorithm to show users more credible channels and “reduce the spread of harmful misinformation and borderline content.” Example channels that produce authoritative content, it tells readers, includes Fox News and CNN. It also noted it would expand information panels underneath videos.
There are a number of reasons this new policy could concern users of its platform. Firstly, the great majority of leaked information — the lifeblood of investigative journalism — is anonymous. Often, like in the cases of Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning or Reality Winner, whistleblowers face serious consequences if their names become attached to documents exposing government or corporate malfeasance. But without a name to go with a document, the difference between leaked data and hacked data is impossible to define. Thus, powerful people and organizations could claim data was hacked, rather than leaked, and simply block all discussion of the matter on the platform. Hearing the news, some feared already existing content from investigative journalists would be subject to removal under the new guidelines.
Youtube just announced that it will no longer allow videos that use information from…. Wikileaks and anything obtained in a ‘hack’ (no evidence was ever shown Wikileaks obtained hacked information) Does this mean @EmpireFiles & @JordanChariton videos will be taken down? pic.twitter.com/R8MBLS1hZZ — Robbie Martin (@FluorescentGrey) August 13, 2020
YouTube’s choice of Fox News and CNN as reliable sources might also raise eyebrows in some quarters. According to the latest Reuters Institute Digital News Report, fewer than half of all Americans trust the two networks (Fox at 42 percent and CNN at 47 percent). And a new study from Gallup/Knight Foundation finds that fewer than a third of the country has a favorable view of the media more generally, including only 19 percent of those under thirty (YouTube’s prime demographic). Many go to the platform precisely because it offers alternative and more diverse opinions to corporate-dominated radio, print and television. But YouTube is now funneling them back towards those same sources.
The 2016 presidential election was colored by Wikileaks’ release of the Podesta emails, discussion of which would be banned under YouTube’s new rules. The Hillary Clinton campaign alleges the emails were hacked from Podesta’s computer. The published communications, the authenticity of which is not in doubt, informed the country of the machinations of the Democratic Party, how it tipped the electoral scales in favor of Clinton and against Bernie Sanders in the primary, how Clinton stated to Wall Street that she had a “public” and a “private” position on regulation, insinuating she was lying to the nation, how representatives of Qatar wanted to meet with her husband Bill for “five minutes” to present him with a $1 million check for his birthday, and how her own staff held her in contempt. The emails, Clinton contends, swung the election from her to Trump. If this is the case, the decision to ban all discussion of them would have fundamentally altered the democratic process.
If YouTube’s actions seem drastic, the Australian state of Queensland introduced laws yesterday that made it illegal to publish allegations of corruption against any politician during election season. Those found guilty would be punished with a six-month jail sentence and a fine of nearly U.S.$5,000. After a public outcry, the law was overturned after only 24 hours.
While misinformation online is a problem, there exist other, more serious threats to electoral integrity. President Trump, who said that Republicans would never get into power again if everybody voted, told Fox Business this week that he is actively withholding funds from the U.S. Postal Service in order to undermine the election to his benefit. “They need that money in order to make the Post Office work so it can take all of these millions and millions of ballots,” he said. “But if they don’t get those two items, that means you can’t have universal mail-in voting, because they’re not equipped to have it.” Add decades of gerrymandering and a campaign of voter suppression that has seen over 1,200 polling stations across the South, primarily in black neighborhoods, and Trump might be able to overcome his polling deficit and beat Biden.
YouTube’s decision to ban discussion of hacked information on its platform is unlikely to significantly improve political discourse or election integrity in the United States. It will, however, continue to tilt the balance in favor of established corporate-funded outlets, to the detriment of new, alternative voices.
Republished from MintPressNews.com under Creative Commons


wearechange--2020-08-14--Yale Epidemiology Professor: Hydroxychloroquine Haters Spewing “Toxic Disinformation”

Yale epidemiology professor Harvey Risch has hit back against critics who say he ’ s been the subject of personal attacks over his insistence that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective in treating COVID-19 if administered early in the disease ’ s progression .
In a Washington Examiner Op-Ed , Risch writes that the pushback against his advocacy for the drug has been “ furious.
” Risch says the personal attacks are a “ dangerous distraction from the real issue of hydroxychloroquine ’ s effectiveness , which is solidly grounded in both substantial evidence and appropriate medical decision-making logic.
” He adds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or in pre-print – which disprove his theory that HCQ should be used on high-risk outpatients , and that “ assertions to the contrary , whether by Faucci , the FDA , or anyone else , are without foundation .
They constitute misleading and toxic disinformation.
” Covid-19 has ‘ two main stages ’ according to Risch , and HCQ works well in the first , but not the second , later stage of the disease : At the first stage , it is a flu-like illness .
That illness will not kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patient and begin treatment immediately , you will almost certainly be done with it in a few days .
When not treated , high-risk patients may progress .
The virus then causes severe pneumonia and attacks many organs , including the heart .
In this second stage , hydroxychloroquine is not effective .
So , as Risch points out , it ’ s important to distinguish which patients HCQ works best for ; “ Does it not work in those who have just started to have symptoms , or those sick enough to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ notes that most low-risk patients , those below 60 with no underlying comorbidities , typically survive without treatment .
High risk patients are those over the age of 60 , or those with chronic conditions such as obesity , diabetes , hypertension , and immunocompromised individuals .
“ High-risk patients need immediate treatment when they first show symptoms , ” Risch writes .
“ One should not wait for the COVID-19 test result , which can take days and be wrong.
” Every randomized controlled trial to date that has looked at early @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients who are not generally treated .
In these studies , so few untreated control patients have required hospitalization that significant differences were not found .
There has been only one exception : In a study done in Spain with low-risk patients , a small number of high-risk nursing home patients were included .
For those patients , the medications cut the risk of a bad outcome in half .
I reiterate : If doctors , including any of my Yale colleagues , tell you that scientific data show that hydroxychloroquine does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they can ’ t tell the difference between low-risk patients who are not generally treated and high-risk patients who need to be treated as quickly as possible .
Doctors who do not understand this difference should not be treating COVID-19 patients .
-Harvey Risch Read the rest of Risch ’ s Op-Ed here .

Yale epidemiology professor Harvey Risch has hit back against critics who say he’s been the subject of personal attacks over his insistence that hydroxychloroquine is highly effective in treating COVID-19 if administered early in the disease’s progression.
In a Washington Examiner Op-Ed, Risch writes that the pushback against his advocacy for the drug has been “furious.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci has implied that I am incompetent, notwithstanding my hundreds of highly regarded, methodologically relevant publications in peer-reviewed scientific literature. A group of my Yale colleagues has publicly intimated that I am a zealot who is perpetrating a dangerous hoax and conspiracy theory. I have been attacked in news articles by journalists who, ignorant of the full picture, have spun hit pieces from cherry-picked sources. -Harvey Risch
Risch says the personal attacks are a “dangerous distraction from the real issue of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness, which is solidly grounded in both substantial evidence and appropriate medical decision-making logic.”
He adds that there a no studies – published or in pre-print – which disprove his theory that HCQ should be used on high-risk outpatients, and that “assertions to the contrary, whether by Faucci, the FDA, or anyone else, are without foundation. They constitute misleading and toxic disinformation.”
Covid-19 has ‘two main stages’ according to Risch, and HCQ works well in the first, but not the second, later stage of the disease:
At the first stage, it is a flu-like illness. That illness will not kill you. If you are a high-risk patient and begin treatment immediately, you will almost certainly be done with it in a few days. When not treated, high-risk patients may progress. The virus then causes severe pneumonia and attacks many organs, including the heart. In this second stage, hydroxychloroquine is not effective.
So, as Risch points out, it’s important to distinguish which patients HCQ works best for; “Does it not work in those who have just started to have symptoms, or those sick enough to require hospitalization?”
Secondly, Risch notes that most low-risk patients, those below 60 with no underlying comorbidities, typically survive without treatment. High risk patients are those over the age of 60, or those with chronic conditions such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and immunocompromised individuals.
“High-risk patients need immediate treatment when they first show symptoms,” Risch writes. “One should not wait for the COVID-19 test result, which can take days and be wrong.”
Every randomized controlled trial to date that has looked at early outpatient treatment has involved low-risk patients, patients who are not generally treated. In these studies, so few untreated control patients have required hospitalization that significant differences were not found. There has been only one exception: In a study done in Spain with low-risk patients, a small number of high-risk nursing home patients were included. For those patients, the medications cut the risk of a bad outcome in half. I reiterate: If doctors, including any of my Yale colleagues, tell you that scientific data show that hydroxychloroquine does not work in outpatients, they are revealing that they can’t tell the difference between low-risk patients who are not generally treated and high-risk patients who need to be treated as quickly as possible. Doctors who do not understand this difference should not be treating COVID-19 patients. -Harvey Risch
Read the rest of Risch’s Op-Ed here.
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-15--“Ghost Town”: Shocking Dystopian Video of NYC Shows an Abandoned, Boarded Up 5th Avenue

De Blasio ’ s New York has finally hit an all-time low : the once bustling city is now on the verge of looking like a demilitarized zone .
Between the pandemic and the riots in the city , iconic 5th Avenue now looks more like a dystopian nightmare in a recently shot video posted to Twitter .
The video follows a car driving down a deserted 5th Avenue , with almost all of the area ’ s high end stores boarded up and shut down .
There are few people seen on what is usually a busy street .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s boarded up .
Even the hotel .
Boarded up , ” the video ’ s narrator , who is obviously fed up with how the city looks , says .
He continues : “ This is all Manhattan , boarded up .
Have you ever seen Manhattan look like this ?
The media will not report this.
” “ Everything ’ s boarded up .
They don ’ t want to show this to you people because they ’ re afraid .
Saks 5th Avenue – boarded up from end to end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Everywhere you see boards , windows are gone .
Look at New York City – what happened , ” he says .
The video runs over 2 minutes and shows dozens of boarded up businesses .
You can watch it here : The video was originally posted as a response to another Tweet that seems to tell the developing tale about DeBlasio ’ s New York :

De Blasio’s New York has finally hit an all-time low: the once bustling city is now on the verge of looking like a demilitarized zone. Between the pandemic and the riots in the city, iconic 5th Avenue now looks more like a dystopian nightmare in a recently shot video posted to Twitter.
The video follows a car driving down a deserted 5th Avenue, with almost all of the area’s high end stores boarded up and shut down. There are few people seen on what is usually a busy street.
“Look at everything. Everything’s boarded up. Even the hotel. Boarded up,” the video’s narrator, who is obviously fed up with how the city looks, says.
He continues: “This is all Manhattan, boarded up. Have you ever seen Manhattan look like this? The media will not report this.”
“Everything’s boarded up. They don’t want to show this to you people because they’re afraid. Saks 5th Avenue – boarded up from end to end. They put up barbed wire. Everywhere you see boards, windows are gone. Look at New York City – what happened,” he says.
The video runs over 2 minutes and shows dozens of boarded up businesses. You can watch it here:
Don't know who recorded it but I downloaded this yesterday He's single handedly wrecked Manhattan Ghost town "Beirut DeBlasio" without the explosion pic.twitter.com/5I48ZGcWTZ — tadgermania (@tadgermania) August 7, 2020
The video was originally posted as a response to another Tweet that seems to tell the developing tale about DeBlasio’s New York:
From an email chain I'm on this morning: "DeBlasio has made the city worse than Dinkins days. I’m selling my place. Already have interest, I’m out!" Now multiply this by the whole city. NYC is toast — Quoth the Raven (@QTRResearch) August 7, 2020
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-18--People In Wuhan, China Are MORE Free Than You Are!

In this video , we cover more surprising comments coming from Bill Gates , as well as how freedoms in @ @ @ @ @ being destroyed .
OH YEAH , since we are not corporate or government owned help @ @ @ @ @ CAN ALSO SUPPORT US ON

In this video, we cover more surprising comments coming from Bill Gates, as well as how freedoms in the US and Australia are being destroyed.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.


wearechange--2020-08-18--Epstein Victim Says He “Showed Her Off” to Trump When She Was 14

Although notorious pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein died last August in a suspicious hanging death at a New York jail , the controversy surrounding the figure shows no sign of dying out – and new details are emerging about the disgraced financier ’ s relationships with people in power .
And according to a new lawsuit from one of his alleged underage victims , Epstein himself brought her to Donald Trump ’ s exclusive Mar-a-Lago resort to show her off to the future president when she was only 14 years old .
The California woman who goes by the name Jane @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Epstein ’ s estate and his ex-girlfriend , British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell , who was arrested by federal authorities in July over allegations that she was involved with Epstein ’ s sex trafficking of young women and minors .
The lawsuit alleges that the woman faced long-term abuse at the hands of the pair which began when she was just 14 years old , reports The Daily Beast .
The lawsuit also includes fresh details about Epstein ’ s relationship with the real estate tycoon Trump during the 1990s .
According to court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mar-a-Lago , Trump ’ s exclusive Palm Beach estate .
“ Doe also claims Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago when she was only 14 years old , ” The Daily Beast reported .
“ ’ This is a good one , right ?
’ Epstein asked the future president , who allegedly smiled and nodded before sharing a chuckle with the depraved hedge funder.
” However , while the lawsuit does raise fresh questions about the extent of Trump and Epstein ’ s relationship – as well as whether Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ repugnant string of crimes against children prior to his arrest – the current president is not accused of any sexual misconduct with the victim .
The late 66-year-old Epstein counted numerous figures from political , cultural , and financial elites among his friends and associates , including former President Bill Clinton , U.K. royal Prince Andrew , MIT artificial intelligence mastermind Marvin Minsky , actor Kevin Spacey , theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking , former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson , billionaire Les Wexner , comedian Woody Allen , celebrity attorney Alan Dershowitz , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk , Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates , and other public figures .
Prior to his suicide last August , Epstein was long known to associate with Trump , a fellow Palm Beach resident .
In 2002 , Trump showered Epstein with praise in an interview with New York Magazine and described him as “ terrific ” while hinting at the financier ’ s taste for sexually abusing girls .
“ I ’ ve known Jeff for 15 years .
Terrific guy , ” he said .
“ He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be with .
It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do , and many of them are on the younger side.
” However , the two had a falling out in the following years , and Epstein spent his final years having never spoken to Trump , according to the White House .
A new book entitled The Grifter ’ s Club , which details the intrigues that take place at Mar-a-Lago , claims Trump banned Epstein from the resort in 2007 after the billionaire sexually harassed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The way this [ member ] described it , such an act could irreparably harm the Trump brand , leaving Donald no choice but to remove Epstein , ” said Sarah Blaskey , a Miami Herald investigative reporter .
One year later in 2008 , Epstein pleaded guilty one count of solicitation of prostitution and one count of solicitation of prostitution with a minor under the age of 18 .
He was largely let off the hook by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta in a non-prosecution plea relating to his sexual exploitation of underage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ required to register as a convicted sex offender with the State of Florida .
The Trump Organization has denied that Epstein was ever a member of Mar-a-Lago , but the new book shows that the disgraced sex offender was a member until his termination in 2007 .
Epstein and Maxwell accuser and former “ sex slave ” Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a locker-room attendant at Trump ’ s Mar-a-Lago club .
Epstein ’ s former partner and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell is expected to face trial in July 2021 .
In a press conference @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also knew Maxwell confirming that he had met the accused sex trafficker “ numerous times over the numerous times over the years , especially since I lived in Palm Beach.
” The president repeatedly said “ I just wish her well .
”

Although notorious pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein died last August in a suspicious hanging death at a New York jail, the controversy surrounding the figure shows no sign of dying out – and new details are emerging about the disgraced financier’s relationships with people in power.
And according to a new lawsuit from one of his alleged underage victims, Epstein himself brought her to Donald Trump’s exclusive Mar-a-Lago resort to show her off to the future president when she was only 14 years old.
The California woman who goes by the name Jane Doe filed a lawsuit last January against Epstein’s estate and his ex-girlfriend, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, who was arrested by federal authorities in July over allegations that she was involved with Epstein’s sex trafficking of young women and minors.
The lawsuit alleges that the woman faced long-term abuse at the hands of the pair which began when she was just 14 years old, reports The Daily Beast.
The lawsuit also includes fresh details about Epstein’s relationship with the real estate tycoon Trump during the 1990s. According to court documents, Epstein brought the then-teen to Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s exclusive Palm Beach estate.
“Doe also claims Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago when she was only 14 years old,” The Daily Beast reported. “’This is a good one, right?’ Epstein asked the future president, who allegedly smiled and nodded before sharing a chuckle with the depraved hedge funder.”
However, while the lawsuit does raise fresh questions about the extent of Trump and Epstein’s relationship – as well as whether Trump knew about Epstein’s perverse and repugnant string of crimes against children prior to his arrest – the current president is not accused of any sexual misconduct with the victim.
The late 66-year-old Epstein counted numerous figures from political, cultural, and financial elites among his friends and associates, including former President Bill Clinton, U.K. royal Prince Andrew, MIT artificial intelligence mastermind Marvin Minsky, actor Kevin Spacey, theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, billionaire Les Wexner, comedian Woody Allen, celebrity attorney Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and other public figures.
Prior to his suicide last August, Epstein was long known to associate with Trump, a fellow Palm Beach resident.
In 2002, Trump showered Epstein with praise in an interview with New York Magazine and described him as “terrific” while hinting at the financier’s taste for sexually abusing girls.
“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” he said. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
However, the two had a falling out in the following years, and Epstein spent his final years having never spoken to Trump, according to the White House.
A new book entitled The Grifter’s Club, which details the intrigues that take place at Mar-a-Lago, claims Trump banned Epstein from the resort in 2007 after the billionaire sexually harassed the daughter of another member.
“The way this [member] described it, such an act could irreparably harm the Trump brand, leaving Donald no choice but to remove Epstein,” said Sarah Blaskey, a Miami Herald investigative reporter.
One year later in 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty one count of solicitation of prostitution and one count of solicitation of prostitution with a minor under the age of 18. He was largely let off the hook by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta in a non-prosecution plea relating to his sexual exploitation of underage girls. However, he was also required to register as a convicted sex offender with the State of Florida.
The Trump Organization has denied that Epstein was ever a member of Mar-a-Lago, but the new book shows that the disgraced sex offender was a member until his termination in 2007.
Epstein and Maxwell accuser and former “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre was a locker-room attendant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club.
Epstein’s former partner and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell is expected to face trial in July 2021.
In a press conference last month, Trump confirmed that he also knew Maxwell confirming that he had met the accused sex trafficker “numerous times over the numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach.” The president repeatedly said “I just wish her well.”
Republished from TheMindUnleashed.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-18--Failing Cities And States Are Going To Extreme Measures!

In this video , we show you how certain cities and states are spiraling out of control as big government @ @ @ @ @ conquer agenda and are now going to extreme measures to keep their taxpayers from leaving @ @ @ @ @ we are not corporate or government owned help us out here .
YOU CAN ALSO @ @ @

In this video, we show you how certain cities and states are spiraling out of control as big government politicians push the divide and conquer agenda and are now going to extreme measures to keep their taxpayers from leaving.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.


wearechange--2020-08-20--Exposure to Common Colds Might Help You Fight COVID-19

Could we have some immunity to SARS-CoV-2 , the virus that causes COVID-19 , without ever having been exposed to it ?
Some new studies found people who were never symptomatic , exposed to , or tested positive for COVID-19 have immune cells that can recognise and possibly kill virus-infected cells .
How is this possible ?
And what does it mean for our fight against COVID-19 ?
There are seven known coronaviruses that can infect humans .
Three can cause severe respiratory symptoms : SARS-CoV-2 , SARS-CoV-1 ( which caused the 2002-04 SARS outbreak ) , and MERS-CoV ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The other four cause relatively mild colds , and are known as the common cold coronaviruses .
It ’ s hard to find an exact figure , but one estimate suggests up to 30 % of all common colds are caused by these coronaviruses , and up to 90 % of us will have some antibodies against them in our blood .
Like the other viruses that cause common colds ( such as rhinoviruses ) , they show a strong seasonality , with a wave of coronavirus infections each winter .
Immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very long–lasting , so we get re-infected with them all the time .
We don ’ t know yet if our immunity to SARS-CoV-2 will also wane over time , and whether that means we could get re-infected .
What Did New Studies Find ?
What these new studies did was expose some people ’ s blood to SARS-CoV-2 .
These blood samples were taken specifically from “ healthy donors ” – people who have never been confirmed to have coronavirus , or from whom blood was collected years before SARS-CoV-2 emerged .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 50 % of these people were found to have immune cells ( called T cells ) that could recognise SARS-CoV-2 .
This is unexpected , as usually specific T cells are only present after infection with the virus .
There are two possible explanations .
Either those “ healthy donors ” were mildly infected with SARS-CoV-2 and didn ’ t show symptoms or develop antibodies , but they did develop a T cell response .
Or , in the case of samples taken before the disease emerged , it means these T @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common colds and SARS-CoV-2 .
More Than Just Antibodies When we get infected with a virus like SARS-CoV-2 , our immune system responds in a range of ways .
It generates antibodies , which can neutralise the virus to stop it entering our cells .
These antibodies are specific to the virus , and thus can be used to test whether we ’ ve had the virus before .
But besides antibodies , we have a host of other immune weapons in our arsenal for fighting off viruses .
T cells are specialised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( including helping us make antibodies ) but are best known for being able to recognise and kill virus-infected cells .
This is really important , because if the virus has evaded antibodies and managed to get into the cells , it can start replicating .
Eliminating the infected cell is one of the most efficient ways to stop the infection .
How do T cells know which of our body ’ s cells are infected with a virus ?
Because they can recognise small but specific snippets of viral proteins that our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These viral snippets on the infected cell surface act like a beacon for the T cells to recognise and eliminate the virus-infected cells .
Like antibodies , after the infection is cleared , we keep some of those T cells around in case we get reinfected with the same virus .
The small bits of virus presented on the infected cell ’ s surface can come from all parts of the virus , including the ones from inside the virus , which tend to be very similar across the different coronaviruses .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a viral protein fragment from one type of coronavirus could potentially recognise the same fragment of viral protein that comes from a different coronavirus .
For example , if a virus was like a car , the antibody might recognise and bind to the outside , and it would only recognise a certain colour , year , and type of car .
But the T cell could recognise the specific bits , like the engine .
So if the same engine was in loads of different cars , even though you might have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s a petrol engine the T cell would recognise it .
So it ’ s possible some of our T cells that were formed during a common cold infection are recognising SARS-CoV-2 and helping our immune system have a headstart for fighting SARS-CoV-2 .
So these T cells can be cross protective — they work against different coronaviruses — and they can be very longlasting .
In patients who recovered from SARS-CoV-1 , specific T cells were still detectable up to 11 years later .
This T cell memory could protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could possibly explain why some people get so sick with COVID-19 while other people do not .
While T cells represent another measure of whether people have been infected or not , we can ’ t use them as a quick diagnostic tool because detecting virus-specific T cells is far more slow , laborious and difficult than detecting antibodies .
We also don ’ t know yet what this pre-existing T cell immunity means for immune protection .
We don ’ t even know whether the specific T cells generated during SARS-CoV-2 infection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 , and how important they are compared with the antibody responses .
Therefore , the most successful vaccines will likely induce both protective antibody and T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 .

Could we have some immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, without ever having been exposed to it?
Some new studies found people who were never symptomatic, exposed to, or tested positive for COVID-19 have immune cells that can recognise and possibly kill virus-infected cells.
How is this possible? And what does it mean for our fight against COVID-19?
Many Common Colds Are Coronaviruses
There are seven known coronaviruses that can infect humans. Three can cause severe respiratory symptoms: SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1 (which caused the 2002-04 SARS outbreak), and MERS-CoV (which was first identified in 2012).
The other four cause relatively mild colds, and are known as the common cold coronaviruses. It’s hard to find an exact figure, but one estimate suggests up to 30% of all common colds are caused by these coronaviruses, and up to 90% of us will have some antibodies against them in our blood. Like the other viruses that cause common colds (such as rhinoviruses), they show a strong seasonality, with a wave of coronavirus infections each winter.
Immunity to these common cold coronaviruses is not very long–lasting, so we get re-infected with them all the time. We don’t know yet if our immunity to SARS-CoV-2 will also wane over time, and whether that means we could get re-infected.
What Did New Studies Find?
What these new studies did was expose some people’s blood to SARS-CoV-2. These blood samples were taken specifically from “healthy donors” – people who have never been confirmed to have coronavirus, or from whom blood was collected years before SARS-CoV-2 emerged.
Depending on the study, between 20 and 50% of these people were found to have immune cells (called T cells) that could recognise SARS-CoV-2. This is unexpected, as usually specific T cells are only present after infection with the virus.
There are two possible explanations. Either those “healthy donors” were mildly infected with SARS-CoV-2 and didn’t show symptoms or develop antibodies, but they did develop a T cell response. Or, in the case of samples taken before the disease emerged, it means these T cells can recognise multiple coronaviruses, including common colds and SARS-CoV-2.
More Than Just Antibodies
When we get infected with a virus like SARS-CoV-2, our immune system responds in a range of ways. It generates antibodies, which can neutralise the virus to stop it entering our cells. These antibodies are specific to the virus, and thus can be used to test whether we’ve had the virus before.
But besides antibodies, we have a host of other immune weapons in our arsenal for fighting off viruses.
T cells are specialised immune cells that have lots of functions (including helping us make antibodies) but are best known for being able to recognise and kill virus-infected cells. This is really important, because if the virus has evaded antibodies and managed to get into the cells, it can start replicating. Eliminating the infected cell is one of the most efficient ways to stop the infection.
T Cells Are Master Detectives
How do T cells know which of our body’s cells are infected with a virus? Because they can recognise small but specific snippets of viral proteins that our cells “present” on their surface. These viral snippets on the infected cell surface act like a beacon for the T cells to recognise and eliminate the virus-infected cells. Like antibodies, after the infection is cleared, we keep some of those T cells around in case we get reinfected with the same virus.
The small bits of virus presented on the infected cell’s surface can come from all parts of the virus, including the ones from inside the virus, which tend to be very similar across the different coronaviruses. That means a T cell that recognises a viral protein fragment from one type of coronavirus could potentially recognise the same fragment of viral protein that comes from a different coronavirus.
For example, if a virus was like a car, the antibody might recognise and bind to the outside, and it would only recognise a certain colour, year, and type of car.
But the T cell could recognise the specific bits, like the engine. So if the same engine was in loads of different cars, even though you might have really different cars, as long as it’s a petrol engine the T cell would recognise it. So it’s possible some of our T cells that were formed during a common cold infection are recognising SARS-CoV-2 and helping our immune system have a headstart for fighting SARS-CoV-2.
So these T cells can be cross protective — they work against different coronaviruses — and they can be very longlasting. In patients who recovered from SARS-CoV-1, specific T cells were still detectable up to 11 years later. This T cell memory could protect us from developing severe COVID-19, and could possibly explain why some people get so sick with COVID-19 while other people do not.
It’s Not All Rosy
While T cells represent another measure of whether people have been infected or not, we can’t use them as a quick diagnostic tool because detecting virus-specific T cells is far more slow, laborious and difficult than detecting antibodies.
We also don’t know yet what this pre-existing T cell immunity means for immune protection. We don’t even know whether the specific T cells generated during SARS-CoV-2 infection will be enough to protect us from COVID-19, and how important they are compared with the antibody responses.
Therefore, the most successful vaccines will likely induce both protective antibody and T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2.
Republished from TheConversation.com under Creative Commons


wearechange--2020-08-19--I Can’t Believe They’re Trying To Make This Mandatory!

In this video , we reveal how scary things are getting as governments both respond to the pandemic and encourage @ @ @ @ @ , since we are not corporate or government owned help us out here .
YOU @ @ @ @ @

In this video, we reveal how scary things are getting as governments both respond to the pandemic and encourage civil unrest.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.


wearechange--2020-08-19--Florida Airport Evacuated After Huge ‘Live’ Missile Found

UPDATE : A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that this missile was carried on an Amazon Air flight .
It has since been updated .
Early this week the cause of a major security incident was revealed which occurred last Friday at an international airport in Polk County , Florida .
Lakeland Linder International Airport was scene of a sudden emergency evacuation when a contractor opened a shipping container to unexpectedly find a massive guided missile inside .
Initial local news reports indicated that airport personnel had no idea how it ended up at a major civilian airport @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parts of an aircraft inside and that the shipment belonged to Draken International , a US defense contractor based in the area which focuses on development of tactical fighter aircraft .
Though it ’ s not unheard of that shipping containers belonging to defense firms might have inert missiles in them , in this instance the missile had a “ live ” warhead , however was not armed .
After the complete evacuation of the airport disposal technicians from nearby MacDill Air Force Base along with members of the ATF and local fire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
Surrounding neighborhoods also had to be evacuated given the huge size of the ordinance .
The live missile is now being stored at MacDill Air Force Base .
Draken International later confirmed in a statement that “ in the process of evaluating arriving shipments discovered something questionable and potentially explosive , ” after which the decision was made to “ evacuate the facility and its surrounding neighbors and contact the appropriate authorities .
”

UPDATE: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that this missile was carried on an Amazon Air flight. It has since been updated.
Early this week the cause of a major security incident was revealed which occurred last Friday at an international airport in Polk County, Florida.
Lakeland Linder International Airport was scene of a sudden emergency evacuation when a contractor opened a shipping container to unexpectedly find a massive guided missile inside.
Initial local news reports indicated that airport personnel had no idea how it ended up at a major civilian airport, only that the container also had parts of an aircraft inside and that the shipment belonged to Draken International, a US defense contractor based in the area which focuses on development of tactical fighter aircraft.
Though it’s not unheard of that shipping containers belonging to defense firms might have inert missiles in them, in this instance the missile had a “live” warhead, however was not armed.
After the complete evacuation of the airport disposal technicians from nearby MacDill Air Force Base along with members of the ATF and local fire departments were called in to dispose of it. Surrounding neighborhoods also had to be evacuated given the huge size of the ordinance.
The live missile is now being stored at MacDill Air Force Base. Draken International later confirmed in a statement that “in the process of evaluating arriving shipments discovered something questionable and potentially explosive,” after which the decision was made to “evacuate the facility and its surrounding neighbors and contact the appropriate authorities.”
Republished from ZeroHedge.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-20--Why So Many People Believe Trump Is Secretly Saving The World From Pedophiles

This week the US president moved from tacit endorsement and evading questions on the toxic QAnon psyop to directly endorsing and supporting it , telling reporters “ I don ’ t know much about the movement other than I understand they like me very much , which I appreciate , ” and saying they ’ re just people who love their country and don ’ t like seeing what ’ s happening in places like Portland , Chicago and New York City .
Asked about the driving theory behind QAnon that Trump is waging a covert war against a satanic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the idea but reframed it by saying that he ’ s leading a fight against “ a radical left philosophy ” .
“ If I can help save the world from problems , I ’ m willing to do it .
I ’ m willing to put myself out there , ” Trump said in response to the query .
“ And we are actually .
We ’ re saving the world from a radical left philosophy that will destroy this country , and when this country is gone , the rest of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump did not claim to be fighting any satanic pedovores , because he is doing nothing of the sort .
Nor is he fighting the deep state ; despite all the virulent narrative spin he ’ s been a fairly conventional Republican president in terms of policy and behavior in all the usual depraved and disgusting ways , and has done nothing of note to stand against the unelected power establishment known as the deep state .
He absolutely has been brutalizing protesters in places like Portland and attacking socialism in places like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he can indeed safely admit to that .
The disingenuous nature of Trump ’ s endorsement hasn ’ t done anything to dampen the excitement and enthusiasm of QAnoners online , though .
I write against QAnon periodically for the exact same reason I write against the plutocratic media : it ’ s an obvious propaganda construct designed to manufacture support for the status quo among people who otherwise would not support it .
It presents itself as an exciting movement where the little guy is finally rising up and throwing off the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been exploiting and oppressing us , yet in reality all it ’ s doing is telling a discontented sector of the population to relax and “ trust the plan ” and put all their faith in the leader of the US government .
And that ’ s exactly what makes QAnon so uniquely toxic .
It ’ s not just that it gets people believing false things which confuse and alienate them , it ’ s that it ’ s a fake , decoy imitation of what a healthy revolutionary impulse would look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truths that they already intuitively know on some level , like the untrustworthiness of the mass media , that the official elected US government aren ’ t really the ones calling the shots , and that we need a great awakening .
It takes those vital , truthful , healthy revolutionary impulses , then twists them around into support for the United States president and the agendas of the Republican Party .
And now literally any time I speak out against Trump doing something self-evidently horrible like orchestrating the extradition of Julian Assange @ @ @ @ @ @ @ official , I get QAnon adherents in the comments section telling me to “ relax ” and “ trust the plan ” because this is actually a brilliant strategic maneuver against the deep state .
Any argument against any longstanding evil Fox News Republican agenda that Trump advances has a widely promulgated explanation for why it ’ s actually good and beneficial among the QAnon crowd .
A healthy impulse to fight the power is twisted into support for the most unconscionable aspects of the ruling power establishment .
You see healthy impulses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , all across the political spectrum .
The healthy impulse to fight racism and bigotry is twisted into support for the warmongering , oppressive and exploitative Democratic Party which is nothing but destructive toward the populations it pretends to protect .
The healthy impulse to defend the helpless and fight tyranny is railroaded into support for acts of regime change “ humanitarian ” interventionism .
The fact that people need to be deceived by their healthy impulses in this way is a good sign ; it means we ’ re generally good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which way to push .
If we were intrinsically wicked and unwise their propaganda wouldn ’ t hook us by telling us to fight tyranny , defend children and tell the truth–it would hook us using our cowardice , our hatred , our greed , our sadism .
People are basically good , and propagandists use that goodness to trick us .
But good will and good intentions aren ’ t enough , unfortunately .
Even intelligence , by itself , isn ’ t enough to save us from being propagandized ; some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ operations like QAnon and Russiagate .
If you want to have a clear perspective on what ’ s really going on in the world you ’ ve got to have an unwavering devotion to knowing what ’ s true that goes right down into your guts .
Most people don ’ t have this .
Most people do not have truth as a foremost priority .
They probably think they do , but they don ’ t .
When it comes right down to it , most people are more invested in finding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in learning what ’ s objectively true .
If they ’ ve got a special hatred for Democrats , the confirmation biases that will give them leave them susceptible to the QAnon psyop .
If they ’ ve got a special hatred for Trump , they ’ re susceptible to believing he ’ s controlled by some kind of Russian government conspiracy .
There are any number of other directions such biases can carry someone .
Only by a humble devotion to truth that is willing to sacrifice any worldview or ideology to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ skilfully navigate through a world that is saturated with disinformation and propaganda .
Sincerely put truth first in all things while doing your best to find out what ’ s actually going on in our world , and eventually you ’ re guaranteed to free yourself from any perceptual distortion .

This week the US president moved from tacit endorsement and evading questions on the toxic QAnon psyop to directly endorsing and supporting it, telling reporters “I don’t know much about the movement other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate,” and saying they’re just people who love their country and don’t like seeing what’s happening in places like Portland, Chicago and New York City.
Asked about the driving theory behind QAnon that Trump is waging a covert war against a satanic pedopheliac baby-eating deep state, Trump endorsed the idea but reframed it by saying that he’s leading a fight against “a radical left philosophy”.
“If I can help save the world from problems, I’m willing to do it. I’m willing to put myself out there,” Trump said in response to the query. “And we are actually. We’re saving the world from a radical left philosophy that will destroy this country, and when this country is gone, the rest of the world would follow.”
Of course Trump did not claim to be fighting any satanic pedovores, because he is doing nothing of the sort. Nor is he fighting the deep state; despite all the virulent narrative spin he’s been a fairly conventional Republican president in terms of policy and behavior in all the usual depraved and disgusting ways, and has done nothing of note to stand against the unelected power establishment known as the deep state. He absolutely has been brutalizing protesters in places like Portland and attacking socialism in places like Venezuela and Bolivia, though, so he can indeed safely admit to that.
The disingenuous nature of Trump’s endorsement hasn’t done anything to dampen the excitement and enthusiasm of QAnoners online, though.
He basically confirmed the movement. We, together with the US military, are the saviors of mankind. What an incredible time to be alive. pic.twitter.com/O5O6rt5TAE — Sokrates (@Sokrates_17) August 19, 2020
I write against QAnon periodically for the exact same reason I write against the plutocratic media: it’s an obvious propaganda construct designed to manufacture support for the status quo among people who otherwise would not support it. It presents itself as an exciting movement where the little guy is finally rising up and throwing off the chains of the tyrannical forces which have been exploiting and oppressing us, yet in reality all it’s doing is telling a discontented sector of the population to relax and “trust the plan” and put all their faith in the leader of the US government.
And that’s exactly what makes QAnon so uniquely toxic. It’s not just that it gets people believing false things which confuse and alienate them, it’s that it’s a fake, decoy imitation of what a healthy revolutionary impulse would look like. It sells people on important truths that they already intuitively know on some level, like the untrustworthiness of the mass media, that the official elected US government aren’t really the ones calling the shots, and that we need a great awakening. It takes those vital, truthful, healthy revolutionary impulses, then twists them around into support for the United States president and the agendas of the Republican Party.
And now literally any time I speak out against Trump doing something self-evidently horrible like orchestrating the extradition of Julian Assange or assassinating Iran’s top military official, I get QAnon adherents in the comments section telling me to “relax” and “trust the plan” because this is actually a brilliant strategic maneuver against the deep state. Any argument against any longstanding evil Fox News Republican agenda that Trump advances has a widely promulgated explanation for why it’s actually good and beneficial among the QAnon crowd.
A healthy impulse to fight the power is twisted into support for the most unconscionable aspects of the ruling power establishment. You see healthy impulses twisted and corrupted like this all the time, all across the political spectrum. The healthy impulse to fight racism and bigotry is twisted into support for the warmongering, oppressive and exploitative Democratic Party which is nothing but destructive toward the populations it pretends to protect. The healthy impulse to defend the helpless and fight tyranny is railroaded into support for acts of regime change “humanitarian” interventionism.
How You Can Be 100% Certain That QAnon Is Bullshit "Here are three reasons you can be absolutely, 100 percent certain that it’s bullshit:" #QAnon #WWG1WGA #Q #MAGAhttps://t.co/qAxdiItXFO — Caitlin Johnstone ? (@caitoz) May 26, 2019
The fact that people need to be deceived by their healthy impulses in this way is a good sign; it means we’re generally good people with a generally healthy sense of which way to push. If we were intrinsically wicked and unwise their propaganda wouldn’t hook us by telling us to fight tyranny, defend children and tell the truth–it would hook us using our cowardice, our hatred, our greed, our sadism. People are basically good, and propagandists use that goodness to trick us.
But good will and good intentions aren’t enough, unfortunately. Even intelligence, by itself, isn’t enough to save us from being propagandized; some fairly intelligent people have fallen for propaganda operations like QAnon and Russiagate. If you want to have a clear perspective on what’s really going on in the world you’ve got to have an unwavering devotion to knowing what’s true that goes right down into your guts.
Most people don’t have this. Most people do not have truth as a foremost priority. They probably think they do, but they don’t. When it comes right down to it, most people are more invested in finding ways to defend their preexisting biases than in learning what’s objectively true. If they’ve got a special hatred for Democrats, the confirmation biases that will give them leave them susceptible to the QAnon psyop. If they’ve got a special hatred for Trump, they’re susceptible to believing he’s controlled by some kind of Russian government conspiracy. There are any number of other directions such biases can carry someone.
Only by a humble devotion to truth that is willing to sacrifice any worldview or ideology to the uncompromising fire of objective reality can skilfully navigate through a world that is saturated with disinformation and propaganda. Sincerely put truth first in all things while doing your best to find out what’s actually going on in our world, and eventually you’re guaranteed to free yourself from any perceptual distortion.
Republished from CaitlinJohnstone.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-20--Psychedelics Can Help Resolve Depression by Helping Patients Cope With Their Emotions, Study Finds

Research published in Frontiers in Psychiatry this month has suggested that psychedelic experiences can reduce levels of depression by helping patients come to terms with their emotions and their memories .
The authors of a new research article pointed to a series of studies that focus on the impact that psychedelics have on “ experiential avoidance ” and “ experiential acceptance.
” It is believed that people who are depressed will do their best to avoid negative or scary situations , and will spend a lot of time focusing on it .
This type of behavior actually causes depression to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think about it more than they should , and prevents them from engaging in activities that might make them feel better , this is experiential avoidance .
Experiential acceptance is understanding your emotions and memories , along with your fears and sadness , and continuing to live your life in the best way that you can .
The studies that the researchers listed appeared to show that psychedelic drugs helped patients achieve experiential acceptance , which allowed them to overcome their depression .
Richard Zeifman , a PhD student at Ryerson University and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Research at Imperial College London , was one of the paper ’ s authors .
“ In contrast with the traditional pharmacological interventions , the effects of psychedelic therapy appear to last months and even years after treatment has ended .
Understanding how psychedelic therapy leads to long-lasting mental health improvements across a range of conditions is not yet fully understood but is important for enhancing and delivering psychedelic therapy to individuals that may benefit from it , ” Zeifman said .
The studies referenced in the paper recruited participants with online ads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to use a psychedelic substance soon , and asked them a series of questions about depression , then later followed up with them after their psychedelic experience to ask the questions again .
Two separate studies were done , one for a group that was taking psychedelics in a ritualistic setting , and another that was taking them in a recreational setting .
Both groups saw positive results .
“ Our findings suggest that one of the reasons that psychedelic therapy has positive therapeutic effects is that it helps individuals to be less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , thoughts , and memories ( even though such experiences may be distressing in the short-term ) .
More broadly , our results provide further support for the negative mental health effects associated with avoidance .
This can be summed up with a saying that is often used in the context of psychedelic therapy , that ‘ The only way out is through , ” Zeifman told PsyPost .
However , the researchers did caution that more studies need to be done to confirm their results because the sample sizes for both studies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conducted in a controlled setting .

Research published in Frontiers in Psychiatry this month has suggested that psychedelic experiences can reduce levels of depression by helping patients come to terms with their emotions and their memories. The authors of a new research article pointed to a series of studies that focus on the impact that psychedelics have on “experiential avoidance” and “experiential acceptance.”
It is believed that people who are depressed will do their best to avoid negative or scary situations, and will spend a lot of time focusing on it. This type of behavior actually causes depression to spiral, because it causes people to think about it more than they should, and prevents them from engaging in activities that might make them feel better, this is experiential avoidance.
Experiential acceptance is understanding your emotions and memories, along with your fears and sadness, and continuing to live your life in the best way that you can. The studies that the researchers listed appeared to show that psychedelic drugs helped patients achieve experiential acceptance, which allowed them to overcome their depression.
Richard Zeifman, a PhD student at Ryerson University and research intern at the Centre for Psychedelic Research at Imperial College London, was one of the paper’s authors.
“In contrast with the traditional pharmacological interventions, the effects of psychedelic therapy appear to last months and even years after treatment has ended. Understanding how psychedelic therapy leads to long-lasting mental health improvements across a range of conditions is not yet fully understood but is important for enhancing and delivering psychedelic therapy to individuals that may benefit from it,” Zeifman said.
The studies referenced in the paper recruited participants with online ads and asked them if they were planning to use a psychedelic substance soon, and asked them a series of questions about depression, then later followed up with them after their psychedelic experience to ask the questions again. Two separate studies were done, one for a group that was taking psychedelics in a ritualistic setting, and another that was taking them in a recreational setting. Both groups saw positive results.
“Our findings suggest that one of the reasons that psychedelic therapy has positive therapeutic effects is that it helps individuals to be less avoidant and more accepting of their emotions, thoughts, and memories (even though such experiences may be distressing in the short-term). More broadly, our results provide further support for the negative mental health effects associated with avoidance. This can be summed up with a saying that is often used in the context of psychedelic therapy, that ‘The only way out is through,” Zeifman told PsyPost.
However, the researchers did caution that more studies need to be done to confirm their results because the sample sizes for both studies were small and the experiments were not conducted in a controlled setting.
Republished from TruthTheory.com with permission


wearechange--2020-08-20--Exposure to Common Colds Might Help You Fight COVID-19, Studies Show


wearechange--2020-08-20--This Is The Plan?? Trump Is Getting Played By The Deep State!

In this video , we get into Steve Bannon , disinformation relating to a certain theory and whether or not @ @ @ @ @ state are working together .
OH YEAH , since we are not corporate or government @ @ @ @ @ .
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT US ON

In this video, we get into Steve Bannon, disinformation relating to a certain theory and whether or not Donald Trump and the deep state are working together.
Sign up on lukeunfiltered.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com.