investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--Oregon bureaucrats applies rules when as suits them

Federal immigration laws ?
Forget about them .
Oregon is a sanctuary state so the rules don ’ t apply to illegal aliens in that state .
Large gatherings ( such as weddings ) during Wuhan virus ?
Nope .
Those are only allowed if you join a very large “ peaceful ” protest .
One hundred days of rioting ?
That ’ s OK. Looting and destroying private and public property ?
That ’ s A-OK as well .
Yet the Oregon GOP filing a voter statement 29 seconds too late ?
Sorry , that won ’ t be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pamphlet because the deadline rules “ apply equally to everyone.
” Apparently the GOP waited until 4:59 on August 25 ( deadline was 5:00 that day ) to file their statement .
One of the reasons the GOP statement was late ?
They were locked out of the online filing system for several hours , delaying the party ’ s ability to file its statement .
KGW8 reports that the GOP statement said , “ Had enough ?
Vote Republican !
” It attacked Democratic leadership in Oregon on issues ranging from “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the pandemic resulting in “ catastrophic small business losses.
” The Oregon GOP has filed a lawsuit in Marion County to get their statement in the pamphlet before it goes to print later this month .
Read all the details here .

by DCG
Federal immigration laws? Forget about them. Oregon is a sanctuary state so the rules don’t apply to illegal aliens in that state.
Large gatherings (such as weddings) during Wuhan virus? Nope. Those are only allowed if you join a very large “peaceful” protest.
One hundred days of rioting? That’s OK.
Looting and destroying private and public property? That’s A-OK as well.
Yet the Oregon GOP filing a voter statement 29 seconds too late? Sorry, that won’t be allowed to make it to the voter pamphlet because the deadline rules “apply equally to everyone.”
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Isn’t THAT rich?
Apparently the GOP waited until 4:59 on August 25 (deadline was 5:00 that day) to file their statement. One of the reasons the GOP statement was late? They were locked out of the online filing system for several hours, delaying the party’s ability to file its statement.
KGW8 reports that the GOP statement said, “Had enough? Vote Republican!” It attacked Democratic leadership in Oregon on issues ranging from “Unrestrained rioting” in Portland to mismanagement of the pandemic resulting in “catastrophic small business losses.”
The Oregon GOP has filed a lawsuit in Marion County to get their statement in the pamphlet before it goes to print later this month.
Read all the details here.
DCG


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--Why the polls are wrong again: As in 2016, Trump supporters are not divulging their vote intentions

The polls leading up to the 2016 presidential elections showed Hillary Clinton winning , but the polls turned out , happily , to be wrong .
Democrats , who had believed the polls , were outraged .
To this day , Demonrats are in denial , having convinced themselves that their candidate lost because Trump had colluded with those dastardly Russians — for which , after a two-year exhaustive FBI investigation that cost taxpayers millions of dollars , there is zero evidence .
Of course , that hasn ’ t stopped Demonrats in repeating the fake Russian collusion story because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up my mind !
Don ’ t confuse me with facts !
” psychopathology .
Well , the signs are pointing to the polls being wrong again in the 2020 election .
Although polls after the Democrat and Republican party conventions show that Joe Biden still has a four-point lead over Trump , this is why those polls are wrong : Many Trump supporters simply are not telling people for whom they ’ ll vote on November 3 .
On September 3 and 6 , 2020 , Rasmussen Reports conducted a national phone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with a +/- 3 margin of sampling error and a 95 % level of confidence .
• As many as 17 % of those who Strongly Approve of the job President Trump is doing say they are less likely to let others know how they intend to vote in the upcoming election .
In contrast , only 8 % who those who Strongly Disapprove of the president ’ s performance say they won ’ t tell others how they ’ ll vote .
• Not surprisingly , Republicans are less likely than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to vote : 16 % of Republicans vs. 12 % of Democrats .
• Independents , i.e.
, those not affiliated with either major political party , are even more inclined to keep secret for whom they ’ ll vote — 21 % .
• Liberals are more likely to talk up their vote than moderates and conservatives are .
• Blacks and other minority voters are less likely than whites this election cycle to tell others how they plan to vote .
• Republicans are more enthusiastic about the election ( which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out to vote ) .
In the 2016 election , Trump supporters also were less likely to divulge how they intended to vote .
At this same time in the 2016 election cycle , Rasmussen found that : • 17 % of Likely Republican Voters were less likely to let others know how they intend to vote compared to previous presidential campaigns .
In contrast , just 10 % of Likely Democratic Voters said they were less likely to tell .
• 25 % of Independents said they were less likely to say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

by Dr. Eowyn
The polls leading up to the 2016 presidential elections showed Hillary Clinton winning, but the polls turned out, happily, to be wrong.
Democrats, who had believed the polls, were outraged.
To this day, Demonrats are in denial, having convinced themselves that their candidate lost because Trump had colluded with those dastardly Russians — for which, after a two-year exhaustive FBI investigation that cost taxpayers millions of dollars, there is zero evidence.
None. Nada. Zilch.
Of course, that hasn’t stopped Demonrats in repeating the fake Russian collusion story because of their “I’ve made up my mind! Don’t confuse me with facts!” psychopathology.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Well, the signs are pointing to the polls being wrong again in the 2020 election.
Although polls after the Democrat and Republican party conventions show that Joe Biden still has a four-point lead over Trump, this is why those polls are wrong: Many Trump supporters simply are not telling people for whom they’ll vote on November 3.
On September 3 and 6, 2020, Rasmussen Reports conducted a national phone and online survey of 1,000 likely voters, with a +/- 3 margin of sampling error and a 95% level of confidence.
The survey found that:
As many as 17% of those who Strongly Approve of the job President Trump is doing say they are less likely to let others know how they intend to vote in the upcoming election. In contrast, only 8% who those who Strongly Disapprove of the president’s performance say they won’t tell others how they’ll vote.
in the upcoming election. In contrast, only 8% who those who Strongly Disapprove of the president’s performance say they won’t tell others how they’ll vote. Not surprisingly, Republicans are less likely than Democrats to tell others how they intend to vote: 16% of Republicans vs. 12% of Democrats.
vs. 12% of Democrats. Independents , i.e., those not affiliated with either major political party, are even more inclined to keep secret for whom they’ll vote — 21% .
, i.e., those not affiliated with either major political party, are even more inclined to keep secret for whom they’ll vote — . Liberals are more likely to talk up their vote than moderates and conservatives are.
Blacks and other minority voters are less likely than whites this election cycle to tell others how they plan to vote.
Republicans are more enthusiastic about the election (which means they are more likely to turn out to vote).
In the 2016 election, Trump supporters also were less likely to divulge how they intended to vote. At this same time in the 2016 election cycle, Rasmussen found that:
17% of Likely Republican Voters were less likely to let others know how they intend to vote compared to previous presidential campaigns. In contrast, just 10% of Likely Democratic Voters said they were less likely to tell.
25% of Independents said they were less likely to say publicly which presidential candidate they will vote.
~Eowyn


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--“The one and only good thing about the lockdowns is that it’s proven society can function without th

“The one and only good thing about the lockdowns is that it’s proven society can function without the public school system. In fact, even the teachers themselves have insisted that they aren’t essential.”

Its not the teachers that aren ’ t essential , however .
They provide an important service .
Its the @ @ @ @ @ are forced to operate that is non essential .
They are not allowed to teach @ @ @ @ @ the word .
Socrates himself would receive a failing grade as a teacher .
We @ @ @ @ @ a bunch of meaningless boxes can get checked , until the end of June finally @ @

by Venus230
Its not the teachers that aren’t essential, however. They provide an important service. Its the bureaucratic system in which they are forced to operate that is non essential.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
They are not allowed to teach in the true sense of the word.
Socrates himself would receive a failing grade as a teacher. We simply rush our schools so a bunch of meaningless boxes can get checked, until the end of June finally arrives.
The one and only good thing about the lockdowns is that it's proven society can function without the public school system. In fact, even the teachers themselves have insisted that they aren't essential. I couldn't agree more. — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) September 10, 2020


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--The South China Sea: What’s Really at Issue

The U.S. thus blocks China , both via the UNCLOS , and via China ’ s main potential method of avoiding its need to rely so heavily upon its usage of the South China Sea — the Thai Canal .
This is consequently a good example of how the imperialistic U.S. Government , which is uniquely hostile toward the United Nations , nonetheless exploits the U.N. , and yet still receives deferential treatment from it — so that the U.S. can actually use the U.N. as a tool to advance its own imperialistic objectives of conquering yet more territory , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ None of this can be understood outside the context of international law itself , which is tragically corrupt , as a result of the following history , the backstory here : We thus live in Truman ’ s post-WW-II world , definitely not in FDR ’ s .
The Israeli Air Force conducted a second round of missiles strikes on Syria in less than a week .
Late on September 2 , Israeli warplanes launched missiles at the T4 airport in the province of Homs .
According to Syria ’ s state media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ direction of the US-controlled zone of al-Tanf on the Syrian-Iraqi border .
Syrian pro-government sources claimed that a large part of the missiles was intercepted .
… The most recent previous Israeli strike on Syria took place on August 31 targeting the countryside of Damascus city and the province of Daraa .
The U.S. and its allies are today ’ s imperialistic fascists , and the U.N. can do nothing against them .
The U.N. can do nothing against the leaders of America and its allies for doing what had been done by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WW II .
Hitler ’ s and Hirohito ’ s spirits thus now rule in the self-styled ( but now only formally ) ‘ democratic ’ countries , whose rulers reign with far nicer rhetoric — far more hypocrisy — than their 1930s fascist predecessors had done .
And the U.N. is dead , because it became created by Harry S. Truman , instead of by FDR .
Consequently , let ’ s consider , in more depth here , the example of China : FDR made a clear distinction between a national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believed that international relations should be an international democracy of independent nations that deal with each other on a cooperative instead of coercive basis , and that international laws should govern this , coming from and being enforced by the United Nations .
By contrast , national democracy was to be a choice that only the people within a given nation should determine , and the U.N. should have no relevance to , or control over , that .
“ Human rights ” are individuals ’ rights , and are an internal matter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of nations are very different , and are the purview exclusively of the U.N. , as FDR was planning it .
This was how he planned for there to be a post-WW-II world which would have no World War III .
each of the major world powers should be allowed to intervene in the internal affairs of a foreign nation only if that foreign nation is on its borders or at least nearby ( which was undefined ) .
This was the Westphalian system , but enhanced so as to be explicitly anti-imperialistic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that both World Wars had resulted from imperialism .
Both leaders rejected imperialism but accepted that there exists a distinction between major and minor powers , such that the nearby surrounds of a major power need to be entirely nations that are allied with that major power , or , at least not hostile toward it — not allied with any major power that is hostile toward itself .
In other words : both men rejected Churchill ’ s demand that empires be allowed , which could extend beyond a major world power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — thus have likewise been hidden from the public , and not debated , nor discussed ; and , thereby , the U.S. and UK have been able to have their way : the system for future global dictatorship was thus born . )
By contrast , today ’ s U.S. regime claims , for example , the authority to dictate what countries should control which international waterways .
This is clearly infringing on the U.N. ’ s area of authority ; and , so , Truman ’ s U.N. has no control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have vague laws which pertain to it .
Today ’ s U.N. ’ s laws ignore one cardinal position — a cardinal geostrategic principle , the Westphalian principle — that FDR and the Soviet Union ’ s dictator , Joseph Stalin , agreed upon and which Winston Churchill opposed : the view that ( which was undefined ) .
This was the Westphalian system , butso as to be explicitly anti-imperialistic , because both FDR and Stalin believed that both World Wars had resulted from imperialism .
Both leaders rejected imperialism but accepted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and minor powers , such that the nearby surrounds of a major power need to be entirely nations that are allied with that major power , or , at least not hostile toward it — not allied with any major power that is hostile toward itself .
In other words : both men rejected Churchill ’ s demand that empires be allowed , which could extend beyond a major world power ’ s own “ neighborhood.
” Churchill wanted to continue the British Empire .
Truman accepted Churchill ’ s view , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stalin .
Consequently , Truman and Churchill agreed together to move forward toward an all-encompassing U.S.-UK Empire .
( Though , nominally , the Westphalian principle had already become a part of the U.N. ’ s subsequent Charter — because of FDR — as being Chapter 1 , Article 2 , Paragraph 7 , it was ignored from the outset , and the U.N. organization itself became set up so as to hide the entire Charter from the public .
The numerous deficiencies in the Charter — such as its failure to include @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Charter could be— thus have likewise been hidden from the public , and not debated , nor discussed ; and , thereby , the U.S. and UK have been able to have their way : the system for future global dictatorship was thus born . )
China ’ s ability to ship its products westward via the South China Sea is crucial to China ’ s economy .
Consequently , the imperialist fascist regime and its allies are trying to reduce that ability .
Because this is Truman ’ s , instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the existing relevant international laws lack sufficient clarity , and the U.S. and its allies can , under existing law , gradually choke-off China ’ s exports .
International Affairs , argues that China ’ s ambition in the South China Sea is primarily driven by China ’ s thousands-of-years-old commercial policy , of being a maritime nation , a nation whose economy is based upon international trade .
This is not imperialistic , but it instead concerns international rights that every nation ought to have .
( Katherine Morton ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s ambition in the South China Sea ” , in the journalargues that China ’ s ambition in the South China Sea is primarily driven by China ’ s thousands-of-years-old commercial policy , of being a maritime nation , a nation whose economy is based upon international trade .
This is not imperialistic , but it instead concerns international rights that every nation ought to have .
( Until 1912 , China was ruled by imperialistic Emperors , but afterwards it was no longer imperialistic and has instead been defending itself against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China ’ s objective is not any grand design to achieve maritime hegemony — such as the U.S. regime has , and such as England , Holland , Spain , Portugal , France , Italy , Germany , and Japan , previously had done .
It ’ s not imperial rule over countries that aren ’ t in their own neighborhood .
It ’ s not conquest ; it is instead self-defense .
America and its allies do the coups , invasions , and international economic sanctions ( economic blockades , even ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , basically , is Morton ’ s argument ( though she doesn ’ t put it in those clear terms ) .
She says that China ’ s “ attention is primarily focused upon demonstrating political resolve to defend China ’ s maritime periphery .
Yet conclusive evidence that the Chinese leadership is intent upon dominating the South China Sea for the broader purpose of building a Sino‐centric maritime order in east Asia is difficult to find.
” ( The obtuseness — if not self-contradictoriness — of her writing might be due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regime ’ s own imperialistic sensibilities .
Such a style is common amongst international-affairs scholars in the U.S.-and-allied world . )
On July 21 , two U.S Air Force B-1B bombers took off from Guam and headed west over the Pacific Ocean to the hotly contested South China Sea .
The sleek jets made a low-level pass over the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan and its escorting fleet , which was exercising nearby in the Philippines Sea , according to images released by the U.S. military .
The operation was part of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China ’ s ruling Communist Party and its sweeping territorial claims over one of the world ’ s most important strategic waterways .
While senior Trump officials launch diplomatic and rhetorical broadsides at Beijing , the U.S. Defense Department is turning to the firepower of its heavily armed , long-range bombers as it seeks to counter Beijing ’ s bid to control the seas off the Chinese coast .
… The U.S. Army also intends to spread forces through the first island chain and other outposts in the Western Pacific .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year and next where troops would deploy to islands in the region , according to senior commanders and top Pentagon officials .
What ’ s at issue there is underwater oil-and-gas exploration-and-development rights of the various nations ’ corporations .
If China truly does not place its corporations ’ commercial interests above the Chinese nation ’ s self-defense interests , then it will sacrifice the former for the latter , and it will cede those other nations ’ rights to exploit that oil and gas , and will settle with its neighbors , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s ‘ allies ’ to support and endorse China ’ s rights to traverse unimpeded through those waterways .
If the U.S. regime then would continue its heavy military fortifications surrounding China , then China would ( in accord with its agreements that it will have reached with Vietnam and those other neighboring nations ) be receiving , from those nations ’ endorsements of China ’ s rights in that regard ( for China ’ s self-defense ) , and from those nations ’ public requests for U.S. forces to depart from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s shipping rights , which would be at least as valuable to China as whatever the natural resources there are worth .
In regards to the 12 July 2016 ruling by UNCLOS , it concerned specifically the case between China and the Philippines , and it presented the Philippines ’ challenging China ’ s claims , which claims were/are based on arguments such as ( regarding “ Scarborough Shoal ” ) that “ Since the Yuan Dynasty , the Chinese people have never stopped developing and exploiting Huangyan Island and its surrounding waters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ management and jurisdiction over their activities all these years.
” The ruling replied to that assertion by saying , “ The Tribunal ’ s conclusions with respect to ” that area are “ independent of the question of sovereignty.
” But , whatever the ruling was based upon , what ’ s relevant here is that the U.S. Government has no right to be sending its warships and other weapons into the South China Sea in order to ‘ enforce ’ UNCLOS ’ s ruling .
And whatever China ’ s claims are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cover ( ed ) a very large area , which encompasses almost all of the South China Sea — it encompasses the area that ’ s within the “ nine-dash line ” , which is shown here in green .
Although UNCLOS ( actually the U.N.-authorized body that administers it , the International Seabed Authority ) is legitimately involved in this matter ; the U.S. Government is the opposite : it is instead an international-law violator and has no right to be involved , at all , and is illegally throwing its weight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and should be expelled — and would be expelled if this were FDR ’ s U.N. , instead of Truman ’ s U.N. Basically , today ’ s U.N. is just a talking-forum , a PR vehicle for its member-nations ; but , actually , at the deepest level , it ’ s a propaganda-agency for imperialism .
That ’ s what it was designed for .
If China can win the support of its neighbors in the region to kick America out , then the sacrifice of such assets as oil and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ price for China to pay .
Unfortunately , today ’ s U.N. must be eliminated and replaced by one that builds upon FDR ’ s intentions , because today ’ s U.N. — Truman ’ s U.N. — is exactly the opposite .
America ’ s having its weaponry and forces on and near China ’ s borders is even worse than when in 1962 the Soviet Union placed its forces in Cuba — and nearly precipitated WW III .
America has no right to be there .
And today ’ s U.N. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — a replacement of it is direly needed .
Details of the existing U.N. ’ s deficiency in the present situation will here be summarily stated : UNCLOS asserts : “ Every State has the right to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles.
” That ’ s the outermost limit of any coastal nation ’ s “ sovereignty.
” Furthermore : “ Non-compliance by warships with the laws and regulations of the coastal State .
If any warship does not comply with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerning passage through the territorial sea and disregards any request for compliance therewith which is made to it , the coastal State may require it to leave the territorial sea immediately.
” But Truman ’ s U.N. possesses no military force of its own and therefore that “ coastal State ” is provided no protection by today ’ s U.N .
Furthermore : UNCLOS even allows an enemy nation ’ s naval vessels into that 12-mile limit , but “ submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no limit upon how near the shore an enemy ’ s warships are allowed to come .
Yet the U.S. violates UNCLOS routinely .
What military force exists against its doing so ?
What legal tribunal exists that covers this ?
Furthermore : The agreement by FDR and Stalin , that any major world power needs to have some sort of right to veto or block any nearby nation from coordinating with any other major power that is hostile toward that given major world power , is entirely absent from the existing U.N. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example : The U.S. , under JFK in 1962 , was acting in violation of the subsequent 1982 UNCLOS , when he ordered the Soviet military to depart from Cuba — that was beyond the 12-mile limit .
Existing international law has to be replaced .
It ignores essential geostrategic concerns to prohibit imperialism and to minimize any likelihood of a WW III .
It needs to be replaced .

by Eric Zuesse, originally posted at Strategic Culture
The South China Sea is basically China’s export waterway to Africa and to Europe (among other markets), but in order for China’s enemy (aspiring conqueror), America , to harm and weaken China maximally, and to use the United Nations assisting in that aggression, America and its allies have cast this vital trade-waterway as being instead basically just an area to be exploited for oil and gas, and minerals, and fishing. The American Government’s aggression — its effort to strangulate China’s international commerce — thus becomes ignored by the U.N., which is consequently handling the entire issue under its law which pertains to a nation’s (China’s) rights to exploit the natural resources of and under a given waterway.
The U.S. thus blocks China, both via the UNCLOS, and via China’s main potential method of avoiding its need to rely so heavily upon its usage of the South China Sea — the Thai Canal.
This is consequently a good example of how the imperialistic U.S. Government, which is uniquely hostile toward the United Nations, nonetheless exploits the U.N., and yet still receives deferential treatment from it — so that the U.S. can actually use the U.N. as a tool to advance its own imperialistic objectives of conquering yet more territory, additional vassal-nations or ‘allies’.
The U.N. is, furthermore, exceptionally proud of its achievement in having finally passed UNCLOS into international law. As it says , “‘Possibly the most significant legal instrument of this century’ is how the United Nations Secretary-General described the treaty after its signing.”
None of this can be understood outside the context of international law itself, which is tragically corrupt, as a result of the following history, the backstory here:
being the global government over all other governments — America’s Government would become a global dictatorship over nations, instead of the U.N. coming into existence as the global democratic republic of nations (FDR’s U.N.) that FDR had aimed for it to be, controlling international relations after World War II, in such a manner as to prevent a WW III. Though the U.N. was invented and even named by America’s President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), he died just before it started, and his successor Harry S. Truman shaped it by modifying FDR’s plan , so that the U.N. would gradually fail, and, instead, the U.S. Government would itself emerge effectively asthe global government over all other governments — America’s Government would become a globalover nations, instead of the U.N. coming into existence as the globalrepublic of nations (FDR’s U.N.) that FDR had aimed for it to be, controlling international relations after World War II, in such a manner as to prevent a WW III.
We thus live in Truman’s post-WW-II world, definitely not in FDR’s.
them), America soon launched a string of coups and invasions — overthrowing and replacing governments that hadn’t even posed any threat, at all, to America’s national security — and the world thereby became increasingly accustomed to the fact that America’s military and CIA are, in fact, the world’s new invading military force, replacing Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and the Emperor’s Japan, in that capacity, as international dictators. (That’s something which FDR had been planning to prevent any nation from being.) The first four U.S. coups were against After World War II (in which the U.S. and UK were allied with the U.S.S.R. against the fascist powers that had invaded countries which had not even been threatening), America soon launched a string of coups and invasions — overthrowing and replacing governments that hadn’t even posed any threat, at all, to America’s national security — and the world thereby became increasingly accustomed to the fact that America’s military and CIA are, in fact, the world’s new invading military force, replacing Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and the Emperor’s Japan, in that capacity, asdictators. (That’s something which FDR had been planning to prevent any nation from being.) The first four U.S. coups were against Thailand in 1948 , Syria in 1949, Iran in 1953, and Guatemala in 1954; and each American coup replaced a moderate leader with a brutal fascist regime, crushing democracy there. (The U.S. takeover in Syria lasted only a few years.) America also engaged in numerous outright military invasions, many of them using hired proxy forces ( U.S.-funded mercenaries ), instead of using U.S. soldiers, as being the U.S. regime’s “boots on the ground,” to do the actual killing and dying. America thereby became the invading country throughout the world, which is what the fascist powers had been in World War II.
above international law, ever since the 1945 end of WW II. In effect, America’s Government has internationally become the world’s government — by force of arms. Other countries are subject to international law, but the U.S. is The post-WW-II America thus emerged as standinginternational law, ever since the 1945 end of WW II. In effect, America’s Government has internationally become the world’s government — by force of arms. Other countries are subject to international law, but the U.S. is not . The U.S. has emerged as the international empire, taking over, and dominating, in more and more countries, until it now openly demands compliance from all countries, and even threatens Iraq’s Government, that if Iraq tries to expel the U.S. occupying forces, the U.S. will permanently destroy Iraq
For example, one of America’s allies — and thus immune to international law — is Israel; and, on September 3rd, the international news site South Front headlined “Israeli Forces Rain Down Missiles on Syria” , and reported that:
The Israeli Air Force conducted a second round of missiles strikes on Syria in less than a week.
Late on September 2, Israeli warplanes launched missiles at the T4 airport in the province of Homs. According to Syria’s state media, the strikes were conducted from the direction of the US-controlled zone of al-Tanf on the Syrian-Iraqi border. Syrian pro-government sources claimed that a large part of the missiles was intercepted. …
The most recent previous Israeli strike on Syria took place on August 31 targeting the countryside of Damascus city and the province of Daraa.
actually only victors’ ‘justice’ against some of Germany’s and Japan’s leaders, but (at the time) the victorious Allies claimed it to be the start of international justice, and to be the enforcement of international law — even though the trials were held only against Germany’s and Japan’s leaders, but not also against Italy’s. (Italy had signed with the Allies the Armistice of Cassabile surrendering on exactly what the U.S. and its allies constantly and now routinely do, after WW II (overthrowing and replacing governments that had not even so much as threatened the U.S. and its allies). Syria does not invade Israel, but Israel routinely invades Syria, and long has done so — and yet Israel’s leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, is not being strung up and executed by an international criminal court, like the leaders of Germany and Japan were supposed to have been, after WW II. That Judgment at Nuremberg , and similar trials against some of Japan’s leaders , wereonly victors’ ‘justice’ against some of Germany’s and Japan’s leaders, but (at the time) the victorious Alliesit to be the start of international justice, and to be the enforcement of international law — even though the trials were held only against Germany’s and Japan’s leaders, but not also against Italy’s. (Italy had signed with the Allies the Armistice of Cassabile surrendering on 8 September 1943 , and this was part of that deal — Italy’s Government wasn’t quite as horrific as the other two , which held out till the bitter end.) These trials were prosecuting against “aggressive war”: the charge was that the imperialistic fascists had invaded countries that hadn’t invaded them —, after WW II (overthrowing and replacing governments that had not even so much as threatened the U.S. and its allies).
The U.S. and its allies are today’s imperialistic fascists, and the U.N. can do nothing against them. The U.N. can do nothing against the leaders of America and its allies for doing what had been done by the leaders of Germany and Japan during WW II.
Hitler’s and Hirohito’s spirits thus now rule in the self-styled (but now only formally) ‘democratic’ countries, whose rulers reign with far nicer rhetoric — far more hypocrisy — than their 1930s fascist predecessors had done. And the U.N. is dead, because it became created by Harry S. Truman, instead of by FDR.
Consequently, let’s consider, in more depth here, the example of China:
FDR made a clear distinction between a national democracy and an international democracy. He believed that international relations should be an international democracy of independent nations that deal with each other on a cooperative instead of coercive basis, and that international laws should govern this, coming from and being enforced by the United Nations. By contrast, national democracy was to be a choice that only the people within a given nation should determine, and the U.N. should have no relevance to, or control over, that. “Human rights” are individuals’ rights, and are an internal matter within each nation, whereas the rights of nations are very different, and are the purview exclusively of the U.N., as FDR was planning it. This was how he planned for there to be a post-WW-II world which would have no World War III.
each of the major world powers should be allowed to intervene in the internal affairs of a foreign nation only if that foreign nation is on its borders or at least nearby (which was undefined). This was the Westphalian system, but enhanced so as to be explicitly anti-imperialistic, because both FDR and Stalin believed that both World Wars had resulted from imperialism. Both leaders rejected imperialism but accepted that there exists a distinction between major and minor powers, such that the nearby surrounds of a major power need to be entirely nations that are allied with that major power, or, at least not hostile toward it — not allied with any major power that is hostile toward itself. In other words: both men rejected Churchill’s demand that empires be allowed, which could extend beyond a major world power’s own “neighborhood.” amended — thus have likewise been hidden from the public, and not debated, nor discussed; and, thereby, the U.S. and UK have been able to have their way: the system for future global dictatorship was thus born.) By contrast, today’s U.S. regime claims, for example, the authority to dictate what countries should control which international waterways. This is clearly infringing on the U.N.’s area of authority; and, so, Truman’s U.N. has no control over the matter, though it does have vague laws which pertain to it. Today’s U.N.’s laws ignore one cardinal position — a cardinal geostrategic principle, the Westphalian principle — that FDR and the Soviet Union’s dictator, Joseph Stalin, agreed upon and which Winston Churchill opposed: the view that(which was undefined). This was the Westphalian system, butso as to be explicitly anti-imperialistic, because both FDR and Stalin believed that both World Wars had resulted from imperialism. Both leaders rejected imperialism but accepted that there exists a distinction between major and minor powers, such that the nearby surrounds of a major power need to be entirely nations that are allied with that major power, or, at least not hostile toward it — not allied with any major power that is hostile toward itself. In other words: both men rejected Churchill’s demand that empires be allowed, which could extend beyond a major world power’s own “neighborhood.” Churchill wanted to continue the British Empire. Truman accepted Churchill’s view, and rejected the view of both FDR and Stalin . Consequently, Truman and Churchill agreed together to move forward toward an all-encompassing U.S.-UK Empire. (Though, nominally, the Westphalian principle had already become a part of the U.N.’s subsequent Charter — because of FDR — as being Chapter 1, Article 2, Paragraph 7 , it was ignored from the outset, and the U.N. organization itself became set up so as to hide the entire Charter from the public. The numerous deficiencies in the Charter — such as its failure to include any clause describing a process by which the Charter could be— thus have likewise been hidden from the public, and not debated, nor discussed; and, thereby, the U.S. and UK have been able to have their way: the system for future global dictatorship was thus born.)
Consequently, geostrategic issues were prohibited by the U.S. regime from being subjects of international law. Though international law allowed vague references to “aggressive war,” simply because FDR’s U.S. had already established the system to pursue and hang German and Japanese leaders for their having done that, the concept of “aggression” became smudged in international law, instead of defined; and, so, aggression is practically absent as a topic of international law as it currently exists. This is how the South China Sea issue came to be treated only as being an issue of natural-resource rights. The U.N.’s Charter is essentially irrelevant to what is the most important. (Even its Westphalian clause — which is only the original, weaker, empire-accepting, form of Westphalianism — is irrelevant, since it’s ignored.)
China’s ability to ship its products westward via the South China Sea is crucial to China’s economy. Consequently, the imperialist fascist regime and its allies are trying to reduce that ability. Because this is Truman’s, instead of FDR’s, post-WW-II world, the existing relevant international laws lack sufficient clarity, and the U.S. and its allies can, under existing law, gradually choke-off China’s exports.
International Affairs, argues that China’s ambition in the South China Sea is primarily driven by China’s thousands-of-years-old commercial policy, of being a maritime nation, a nation whose economy is based upon international trade. This is not imperialistic, but it instead concerns international rights that every nation ought to have. ( Katherine Morton’s 20 July 2016 article, “China’s ambition in the South China Sea” , in the journalargues that China’s ambition in the South China Sea is primarily driven by China’s thousands-of-years-old commercial policy, of being a maritime nation, a nation whose economy is based upon international trade. This is not imperialistic, but it instead concerns international rights that every nation ought to have. ( Until 1912 , China was ruled by imperialistic Emperors, but afterwards it was no longer imperialistic and has instead been defending itself against imperialistic powers.) Morton argues that China’s objective is not any grand design to achieve maritime hegemony — such as the U.S. regime has, and such as England, Holland, Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Germany, and Japan, previously had done. It’s not imperial rule over countries that aren’t in their own neighborhood. It’s not conquest; it is instead self-defense. America and its allies do the coups, invasions, and international economic sanctions (economic blockades, even), but China does not. That, basically, is Morton’s argument (though she doesn’t put it in those clear terms). She says that China’s “attention is primarily focused upon demonstrating political resolve to defend China’s maritime periphery. Yet conclusive evidence that the Chinese leadership is intent upon dominating the South China Sea for the broader purpose of building a Sino‐centric maritime order in east Asia is difficult to find.” (The obtuseness — if not self-contradictoriness — of her writing might be due to her desire not to offend the U.S. regime’s own imperialistic sensibilities. Such a style is common amongst international-affairs scholars in the U.S.-and-allied world.)
On July 21, two U.S Air Force B-1B bombers took off from Guam and headed west over the Pacific Ocean to the hotly contested South China Sea. The sleek jets made a low-level pass over the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan and its escorting fleet, which was exercising nearby in the Philippines Sea, according to images released by the U.S. military. The operation was part of the Trump administration’s intensifying challenge to China’s ruling Communist Party and its sweeping territorial claims over one of the world’s most important strategic waterways. While senior Trump officials launch diplomatic and rhetorical broadsides at Beijing, the U.S. Defense Department is turning to the firepower of its heavily armed, long-range bombers as it seeks to counter Beijing’s bid to control the seas off the Chinese coast. …
The U.S. Army also intends to spread forces through the first island chain and other outposts in the Western Pacific. It is planning a series of major exercises this year and next where troops would deploy to islands in the region, according to senior commanders and top Pentagon officials.
The U.S. regime is using, as its excuse, its backing the territorial claims of what it claims to be its ‘allies’ against China — such as Vietnam . Meanwhile, the regime is applying diplomacy and other means, in order to encourage those ‘allies’ to insist upon, and not to compromise or weaken, those claims. Vietnam quickly responded to America’s active backing, by “Vietnam Threatens China with Litigation over the South China Sea”
What’s at issue there is underwater oil-and-gas exploration-and-development rights of the various nations’ corporations. If China truly does not place its corporations’ commercial interests above the Chinese nation’s self-defense interests, then it will sacrifice the former for the latter, and it will cede those other nations’ rights to exploit that oil and gas, and will settle with its neighbors, for an agreement by all of America’s ‘allies’ to support and endorse China’s rights to traverse unimpeded through those waterways.
If the U.S. regime then would continue its heavy military fortifications surrounding China, then China would (in accord with its agreements that it will have reached with Vietnam and those other neighboring nations) be receiving, from those nations’ endorsements of China’s rights in that regard (for China’s self-defense), and from those nations’ public requests for U.S. forces to depart from their region, support for China’s shipping rights, which would be at least as valuable to China as whatever the natural resources there are worth.
In regards to the 12 July 2016 ruling by UNCLOS, it concerned specifically the case between China and the Philippines , and it presented the Philippines’ challenging China’s claims, which claims were/are based on arguments such as (regarding “Scarborough Shoal”) that “Since the Yuan Dynasty, the Chinese people have never stopped developing and exploiting Huangyan Island and its surrounding waters and the Chinese government has exercised effective management and jurisdiction over their activities all these years.” The ruling replied to that assertion by saying, “The Tribunal’s conclusions with respect to” that area are “independent of the question of sovereignty.” But, whatever the ruling was based upon, what’s relevant here is that the U.S. Government has no right to be sending its warships and other weapons into the South China Sea in order to ‘enforce’ UNCLOS’s ruling. And whatever China’s claims are or were in this matter, they cover(ed) a very large area, which encompasses almost all of the South China Sea — it encompasses the area that’s within the “nine-dash line” , which is shown here in green . Although UNCLOS (actually the U.N.-authorized body that administers it, the International Seabed Authority ) is legitimately involved in this matter; the U.S. Government is the opposite: it is instead an international-law violator and has no right to be involved, at all, and is illegally throwing its weight around where it doesn’t belong and should be expelled — and would be expelled if this were FDR’s U.N., instead of Truman’s U.N.
Another way that Truman’s U.N. helps the U.S. regime geostrategically against China is the issue of Hong Kong — an internal Chinese matter, which wouldn’t even be a U.N. concern if the U.N. had been created instead by the U.N.’s inventor, FDR. (Even the original, weaker, form of the Westphalian principle — the version that’s in the U.N.’s Charter — would prohibit outside involvement in this matter.) As Reuters headlined on September 3rd, “U.N. experts decry Hong Kong security law in open letter to China” . Any U.N. that gets involved in any nation’s internal affairs, and in such things as ‘human rights’, should be simply dissolved, because it is advancing imperialism, instead of preventing it.
Basically, today’s U.N. is just a talking-forum, a PR vehicle for its member-nations; but, actually, at the deepest level, it’s a propaganda-agency for imperialism. That’s what it was designed for.
If China can win the support of its neighbors in the region to kick America out, then the sacrifice of such assets as oil and gas there would be a relatively inconsequential price for China to pay. Unfortunately, today’s U.N. must be eliminated and replaced by one that builds upon FDR’s intentions, because today’s U.N. — Truman’s U.N. — is exactly the opposite.
America’s having its weaponry and forces on and near China’s borders is even worse than when in 1962 the Soviet Union placed its forces in Cuba — and nearly precipitated WW III. America has no right to be there. And today’s U.N. has no justification to continue its existence — a replacement of it is direly needed.
Details of the existing U.N.’s deficiency in the present situation will here be summarily stated: UNCLOS asserts : “Every State has the right to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles.” That’s the outermost limit of any coastal nation’s “sovereignty.” Furthermore: “Non-compliance by warships with the laws and regulations of the coastal State. If any warship does not comply with the laws and regulations of the coastal State concerning passage through the territorial sea and disregards any request for compliance therewith which is made to it, the coastal State may require it to leave the territorial sea immediately.” But Truman’s U.N. possesses no military force of its own and therefore that “coastal State” is provided no protection by today’s U.N. Furthermore: UNCLOS even allows an enemy nation’s naval vessels into that 12-mile limit, but “submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface and to show their flag.” There is no limit upon how near the shore an enemy’s warships are allowed to come. Yet the U.S. violates UNCLOS routinely. What military force exists against its doing so? What legal tribunal exists that covers this? Furthermore: The agreement by FDR and Stalin, that any major world power needs to have some sort of right to veto or block any nearby nation from coordinating with any other major power that is hostile toward that given major world power, is entirely absent from the existing U.N. — existing international law. Consequently, for example: The U.S., under JFK in 1962, was acting in violation of the subsequent 1982 UNCLOS, when he ordered the Soviet military to depart from Cuba — that was beyond the 12-mile limit. Existing international law has to be replaced. It ignores essential geostrategic concerns to prohibit imperialism and to minimize any likelihood of a WW III. It needs to be replaced.
—————


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--The Insanity of Boris Johnson & the Destruction of Britain

Slovak Parliament passed , a few days ago , the law that obliges telecoms to hand over to the Ministry of Health the data ( name , cell phone number , and location info for the last 2 weeks ) on everyone who has , at any point in the prior two weeks , been abroad ( and has now entered Slovakia ) .
This goes contrary to the previous telecom laws that provided for some privacy ; now privacy is out and total government surveillance is in .
For “ health ” reasons , of course .
The government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which Slovaks ( or people with a Slovak cell phone ) have not complied with the decree that forces everyone who returns from a “ high risk ” country ( which now includes virtually every country in the world , incl .
most European ones ) to get immediately tested for “ covid ” as well as quarantine for two weeks .
The fine for not complying with the test/quarantine is 5,000 euros – about half of the average annual wage in Slovakia !
( Also , in an extension of the obligatory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ schools will now have to wear masks !
In a country with 37 alleged “ covid ” deaths since March , and a handful of people in hospitals with “ covid ” .
Btw , the fines for not wearing a muzzle where it ’ s mandated are up to 1,695 euros . )
Meanwhile , more tyranny in the UK too .
New restrictions make meetings with more than 6 people illegal , and one can get arrested ( and fined up to 3,200 GBP ) .
So I guess that also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ convenient !
Any hospitality venues that are allowed to be open ( such as restaurants , cafes , pubs , etc ) must take and keep customers ’ contact info ( for tracking & tracing ) .
And , thousands of “ Covid-secure marshalls ” will be policing towns and streets to ensure everyone is obeying the rules ( “ social distancing ” , masks , etc ) .
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the new rules will last for the ‘ foreseeable future ’ , and will only be withdrawn after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testing .
Even more insanely , they plan to test every person EVERY WEEK , doing 10 million “ covid ” tests every single day ( by early 2021 – so obviously the plan is to keep this farce on for the long term ) .
Only the people who have a negative test would be allowed to enter venues and public places !
Workplaces , schools , football stadiums , entertainment venues , GP surgeries and pharmacies are all outlined as potential sites where testing could take place .
Digital immunity passports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be rolled out to allow safe travel , a return to work and other activities .
It comes after it emerged that theatres and sports venues could soon test all audience members and let in those with a negative result under the Prime Minister ’ s plans to get life in the UK back to normal .
Mr Johnson today announced a pilot programme will be launched in Salford next month which will see audiences at both indoor and outdoor venues tested on the day to see if they are infectious .
Those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sent home while those who test negative will be allowed in .
Mr Johnson told a Downing Street coronavirus press conference this evening that negative tests would effectively provide people with a ‘ passport ’ which would allow them a ‘ freedom to mingle with everybody else who is similarly not infectious in a way that is currently impossible ’ .
‘ in the near future we want to start using testing to identify people who are negative… so we can allow them to behave in a more normal way.
’ And , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infected ” has allegedly been rising .
( As in every other country , the vast majority of these alleged “ infected ” have no symptoms whatsoever . )
From 13,000 daily tests in April to some 240,000 daily tests now !
REPLY : These politicians know full well that there is no pandemic .
They are deliberately doing this because their economies are collapsing and using this virus is the best way to pretend they are protecting the people while they are preparing to try to reorganize the economy and cleverly default @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a disgrace to the conservative Party .
I am glad Maggie Thatcher is not alive to see what Borris has done .
Anyone who doubted that the British pound would penetrate the 1985 low , perhaps should take a closer look .

by Martin Armstrong
COMMENT:
Hi Marty,
Slovak Parliament passed, a few days ago, the law that obliges telecoms to hand over to the Ministry of Health the data (name, cell phone number, and location info for the last 2 weeks) on everyone who has, at any point in the prior two weeks, been abroad (and has now entered Slovakia). This goes contrary to the previous telecom laws that provided for some privacy; now privacy is out and total government surveillance is in. For “health” reasons, of course. The government will thus be able to instantly know which Slovaks (or people with a Slovak cell phone) have not complied with the decree that forces everyone who returns from a “high risk” country (which now includes virtually every country in the world, incl. most European ones) to get immediately tested for “covid” as well as quarantine for two weeks. The fine for not complying with the test/quarantine is 5,000 euros – about half of the average annual wage in Slovakia!
(Also, in an extension of the obligatory muzzle decree, even little kids in schools will now have to wear masks! In a country with 37 alleged “covid” deaths since March, and a handful of people in hospitals with “covid”. Btw, the fines for not wearing a muzzle where it’s mandated are up to 1,695 euros.)
Meanwhile, more tyranny in the UK too.
New restrictions make meetings with more than 6 people illegal, and one can get arrested (and fined up to 3,200 GBP). So I guess that also means no more anti-tyranny demonstrations. How convenient!
Any hospitality venues that are allowed to be open (such as restaurants, cafes, pubs, etc) must take and keep customers’ contact info (for tracking & tracing). And, thousands of “Covid-secure marshalls” will be policing towns and streets to ensure everyone is obeying the rules (“social distancing”, masks, etc).
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the new rules will last for the ‘foreseeable future’, and will only be withdrawn after the implementation of a vaccine or better mass testing.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Even more insanely, they plan to test every person EVERY WEEK, doing 10 million “covid” tests every single day (by early 2021 – so obviously the plan is to keep this farce on for the long term). Only the people who have a negative test would be allowed to enter venues and public places!
Workplaces, schools, football stadiums, entertainment venues, GP surgeries and pharmacies are all outlined as potential sites where testing could take place. Digital immunity passports for those who test negative would also be rolled out to allow safe travel, a return to work and other activities.
It comes after it emerged that theatres and sports venues could soon test all audience members and let in those with a negative result under the Prime Minister’s plans to get life in the UK back to normal. Mr Johnson today announced a pilot programme will be launched in Salford next month which will see audiences at both indoor and outdoor venues tested on the day to see if they are infectious. Those who test positive for coronavirus will be sent home while those who test negative will be allowed in. Mr Johnson told a Downing Street coronavirus press conference this evening that negative tests would effectively provide people with a ‘passport’ which would allow them a ‘freedom to mingle with everybody else who is similarly not infectious in a way that is currently impossible’. ‘in the near future we want to start using testing to identify people who are negative… so we can allow them to behave in a more normal way.’
And, here is why the number of “infected” has allegedly been rising. (As in every other country, the vast majority of these alleged “infected” have no symptoms whatsoever.)
From 13,000 daily tests in April to some 240,000 daily tests now!
Take care.
P
REPLY: These politicians know full well that there is no pandemic. They are deliberately doing this because their economies are collapsing and using this virus is the best way to pretend they are protecting the people while they are preparing to try to reorganize the economy and cleverly default on national debts. Borris Johnson is a disgrace to the conservative Party. I am glad Maggie Thatcher is not alive to see what Borris has done. Anyone who doubted that the British pound would penetrate the 1985 low, perhaps should take a closer look.


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--If the riots are Trump’s fault, do you really think the mass media would have spent the last 3 month

If the riots are Trump’s fault, do you really think the mass media would have spent the last 3 months calling them “peaceful protests?”

( Natural News ) According to the Left , everything is Trump ’ s fault .
Global warming .
Covid .
Riots in every metropolitan city .
Russians ruining Hillary ’ s chance at President .
You name it and if it ’ s bad , it ’ s Trump ’ s fault , but that ’ s just the lying mass media talking , even though Trump debunked fake news right from the beginning .
In fact , that ’ s one of the main reasons he won the White House , and will win again .
CNN , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news , and they ’ ve all been calling the protests peaceful since the Floyd incident , despite countless occurrences of BLM and Antifa thugs killing , raping , pillaging , looting , fire-bombing , and Neanderthal style beatings and muggings .
The media wanted to portray the fake race war as peaceful on the Left and violent from the Right .
Again , Orange Man bad .
Now , the polls are showing that the ignorant Left had no idea , until Kenosha , that there was anything bad happening at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the narrative must change .
The riots are Trump ’ s fault .
They ’ re violent because he incites riots with his immense hatred of Blacks and Jews and Mexicans and Arabs and Chinese and… and… well , again , Orange Man bad .
According to the Left , the Russians helped Trump win , Trump spread Covid and killed 180,000 innocent Americans , and so the violent , insane riots are all justified If you hate Trump and you live in a big city ( or travel to one while getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cops and stores ) , then it ’ s legal to murder , rape and torture people while setting cars and stores on fire , as long as you spray paint BLM somewhere to let people know that you support people who have supposedly been oppressed for hundreds of years .
This is a movement paid for by rich white dudes to get poor White and Black people to murder other people , Black or White or Brown , in the name of racial equality .
If the protests were actually peaceful , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sleezy Kamala , because that ’ s what fake news does .
The riots will only get worse and for one reason : Losers without jobs who already have violent arrest records love getting paid to destroy anything .
They ’ re so worked up from the fake news that they ’ re all ready to go back to jail for rioting , which could be their covid death-sentence , after all .
Funny how there ’ s not one single video ( in context ) of Trump being a racist , white @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with loyal readers over the past five years , as most people who aren ’ t insane enough to think socialism is just communism in sheep ’ s clothing , now know that the Left has gone off the deep end for good , and there ’ s no coming back from it .
That ’ s why everything is on the line this election .
That ’ s why the Left must lie , cheat , steel , rape , molest and kill – in order to win over the scum of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and no rights .
Truth news exposes the Left all the time , with videos of violent riots , politician hypocrisy and lies they told just weeks and months ago that they hope everyone already forgot about .
Meanwhile , the whole narrative of Trump being a white-supremacist dictator has fallen apart over and over , from the fake Russian-collusion hoax , to the impeachment hoax , to the peaceful riots hoax .
Every lie blows up in their faces , while Biden can ’ t keep up with what happened yesterday .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the perverted , misogynistic White Supremacist freak , not Trump .
It ’ s pretty obvious now .
Tune your internet dial to Trump.news for updates on the war against domestic terror ( a.k.a .
BLM and Antifa ) .
According to every American voting Democrat in November ( about 40 million or less ) , every protest is peaceful and loving and supports treating Black people with respect and dignity .
Sure .
Just watch .

by: S.D. Wells
(Natural News) According to the Left, everything is Trump’s fault. Global warming. Covid. Riots in every metropolitan city. Russians ruining Hillary’s chance at President. You name it and if it’s bad, it’s Trump’s fault, but that’s just the lying mass media talking, even though Trump debunked fake news right from the beginning.
In fact, that’s one of the main reasons he won the White House, and will win again. CNN, WaPo and NYT are nothing but fake news, and they’ve all been calling the protests peaceful since the Floyd incident, despite countless occurrences of BLM and Antifa thugs killing, raping, pillaging, looting, fire-bombing, and Neanderthal style beatings and muggings.
The media wanted to portray the fake race war as peaceful on the Left and violent from the Right. Again, Orange Man bad.
Now, the polls are showing that the ignorant Left had no idea, until Kenosha, that there was anything bad happening at all at any protests anywhere, so now the narrative must change. The riots are Trump’s fault. They’re violent because he incites riots with his immense hatred of Blacks and Jews and Mexicans and Arabs and Chinese and… and… well, again, Orange Man bad.
According to the Left, the Russians helped Trump win, Trump spread Covid and killed 180,000 innocent Americans, and so the violent, insane riots are all justified
If you hate Trump and you live in a big city (or travel to one while getting paid by Soros to destroy citizens, cops and stores), then it’s legal to murder, rape and torture people while setting cars and stores on fire, as long as you spray paint BLM somewhere to let people know that you support people who have supposedly been oppressed for hundreds of years. This is a movement paid for by rich white dudes to get poor White and Black people to murder other people, Black or White or Brown, in the name of racial equality.
If the protests were actually peaceful, they would have credited Creepy Joe and Sleezy Kamala, because that’s what fake news does. The riots will only get worse and for one reason: Losers without jobs who already have violent arrest records love getting paid to destroy anything. They’re so worked up from the fake news that they’re all ready to go back to jail for rioting, which could be their covid death-sentence, after all.
Funny how there’s not one single video (in context) of Trump being a racist, white supremacist or xenophobe
Alternative news has exploded with loyal readers over the past five years, as most people who aren’t insane enough to think socialism is just communism in sheep’s clothing, now know that the Left has gone off the deep end for good, and there’s no coming back from it. That’s why everything is on the line this election. That’s why the Left must lie, cheat, steel, rape, molest and kill – in order to win over the scum of the earth to vote for free stuff and no rights.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Truth news exposes the Left all the time, with videos of violent riots, politician hypocrisy and lies they told just weeks and months ago that they hope everyone already forgot about. Meanwhile, the whole narrative of Trump being a white-supremacist dictator has fallen apart over and over, from the fake Russian-collusion hoax, to the impeachment hoax, to the peaceful riots hoax. Every lie blows up in their faces, while Biden can’t keep up with what happened yesterday.
Let’s face it, Biden is the perverted, misogynistic White Supremacist freak, not Trump. It’s pretty obvious now. Tune your internet dial to Trump.news for updates on the war against domestic terror (a.k.a. BLM and Antifa).
According to every American voting Democrat in November (about 40 million or less), every protest is peaceful and loving and supports treating Black people with respect and dignity. Sure. Just watch.
Sources for this article include:
Trump.news
NaturalNews.com
ZeroHedge.com


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--Matt Drudge accused of “payola” scheme, rigging news for profit

( Natural News ) Conservative media pioneer Matt Drudge has been accused of setting up an online “ payola ” scheme , controlling various news agencies with a pay-to-play scheme that rigs the news for profit .
The 53-year-old news wizard has been cherry-picking stories from various news agencies for over twenty years , creating an influential media empire known as the Drudge Report .
Millions of loyal Drudge Report readers have been wrapped up in Matt ’ s alternative reality .
Drudge was instrumental in getting President Donald Trump elected in 2016 .
He understands exactly how to get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to motivate readers .
But according to those on the inside , Matt Drudge operates less on principle and conviction and more so on doing what ’ s best for advancing the profits of his media empire .
Undercover journalist Matthew Lysiak , a former investigative reporter with the New York Daily News , conducted over 200 interviews to understand how Matt Drudge operates his media empire to influence politics and manipulate public perception .
Lysiak ran the Drudge Report in the mornings for nearly four years .
Lysiak ’ s new book @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Untold Story of How Talk Radio , Fox News , And A Gift Shop Clerk with An Internet Connection Took Down the Mainstream Media ” tells an interesting story about a secretive character ( Matt Drudge ) whom many people knew little about .
Matt Drudge allegedly rigs the news for profit using pay-to-play schemes In Lysiak ’ s new book , insiders reveal the rocky relationship between Andrew Breitbart and Matt Drudge , how they engaged in a pay-to-play scheme for years .
The insiders reveal that the Drudge Report was used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ site ’ s popularity surged , Mr. Drudge turned the power of his website into political currency .
The Drudge report was leveraged as a henchman for conservative news , demanding quid-pro-quo along the way .
“ Breitbart had other revenue ideas .
He entered into a pay-per-click financial arrangement with Reuters that further altered the page , ” Mr. Lysiak writes .
In an interview with Tim Griffin , former head of research for the Republican National Committee , Mr. Lysiak reveals how the RNC got news stories out to the mainstream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washington Post .
The RNC would negotiate with a reporter with the Washington Post , allowing them to take on their contrarian narrative as long as the Drudge Report got to do the same story using a conservative angle .
In this way all parties benefited .
The RNC got their message amplified , motivating the conservative base , the Washington Post could get their page views up , and Matt Drudge could profit off an exclusive .
Both sides of the political aisle tried to use the Drudge Report .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton campaign tried to use the Drudge Report in 2008 to amplify her messages .
“ We had a very familiar and very regular relationship for a long time , ” Sefl told Lysiak .
“ When he was about to post a story that wasn ’ t going in Hillary ’ s favor , I always got a heads up , and sometimes I was able to convince him to change something .
Sometimes I wasn ’ t. ” In 2020 , the Drudge Report appeared to turn on its reader base @ @ @ @ @ @ @ site ’ popularity has taken a down turn as a result , as many of Trump ’ s supporters reject the political games .
Matt Drudge has been using his influence to weaponize his website for years , but these new revelations show just how entrenched Drudge is in the political swamp , how he ’ ll sell out the site for corporate or political interests .
These revelations show how a “ conservative news site ” can lack integrity , using conservative messages and populist ideas to manipulate people en masse .

by: Lance D Johnson
(Natural News) Conservative media pioneer Matt Drudge has been accused of setting up an online “payola” scheme, controlling various news agencies with a pay-to-play scheme that rigs the news for profit. The 53-year-old news wizard has been cherry-picking stories from various news agencies for over twenty years, creating an influential media empire known as the Drudge Report. Millions of loyal Drudge Report readers have been wrapped up in Matt’s alternative reality. Drudge was instrumental in getting President Donald Trump elected in 2016. He understands exactly how to get the inside scoop and use political messaging to motivate readers. But according to those on the inside, Matt Drudge operates less on principle and conviction and more so on doing what’s best for advancing the profits of his media empire.
Undercover journalist Matthew Lysiak, a former investigative reporter with the New York Daily News, conducted over 200 interviews to understand how Matt Drudge operates his media empire to influence politics and manipulate public perception. Lysiak ran the Drudge Report in the mornings for nearly four years. Lysiak’s new book, “The Drudge Revolution: The Untold Story of How Talk Radio, Fox News, And A Gift Shop Clerk with An Internet Connection Took Down the Mainstream Media” tells an interesting story about a secretive character (Matt Drudge) whom many people knew little about.
Matt Drudge allegedly rigs the news for profit using pay-to-play schemes
In Lysiak’s new book, insiders reveal the rocky relationship between Andrew Breitbart and Matt Drudge, how they engaged in a pay-to-play scheme for years. The insiders reveal that the Drudge Report was used as a conservative mafia. As his site’s popularity surged, Mr. Drudge turned the power of his website into political currency. The Drudge report was leveraged as a henchman for conservative news, demanding quid-pro-quo along the way. “Breitbart had other revenue ideas. He entered into a pay-per-click financial arrangement with Reuters that further altered the page,” Mr. Lysiak writes.
In an interview with Tim Griffin, former head of research for the Republican National Committee, Mr. Lysiak reveals how the RNC got news stories out to the mainstream. The RNC would first contact the Washington Post. The RNC would negotiate with a reporter with the Washington Post, allowing them to take on their contrarian narrative as long as the Drudge Report got to do the same story using a conservative angle. In this way all parties benefited. The RNC got their message amplified, motivating the conservative base, the Washington Post could get their page views up, and Matt Drudge could profit off an exclusive.
Both sides of the political aisle tried to use the Drudge Report. According to Hillary Clinton advisor Tracy Sefl, the Clinton campaign tried to use the Drudge Report in 2008 to amplify her messages. “We had a very familiar and very regular relationship for a long time,” Sefl told Lysiak. “When he was about to post a story that wasn’t going in Hillary’s favor, I always got a heads up, and sometimes I was able to convince him to change something. Sometimes I wasn’t.”
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
In 2020, the Drudge Report appeared to turn on its reader base, aggregating liberal news stories. The site’ popularity has taken a down turn as a result, as many of Trump’s supporters reject the political games.
Matt Drudge has been using his influence to weaponize his website for years, but these new revelations show just how entrenched Drudge is in the political swamp, how he’ll sell out the site for corporate or political interests. These revelations show how a “conservative news site” can lack integrity, using conservative messages and populist ideas to manipulate people en masse.
Sources include:
TruePundit.com
NaturalNews.com


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--Trouble mounts for the ECB and Christine Lagarde

Today is ECB ( European Central Bank ) day where we get the results of their latest deliberations .
We may get a minor move but essentially it is one for what we have come to call open mouth operations .
This is more than a little awkward when the President has already established a reputation for putting her Hermes shod foot in her mouth .
Who can forget this from March 12th ?
If you are ever not sure of the date just take a look at a chart of the Italian government bond market as it is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As many put it the ECB had gone from “ Whatever it takes ” to “ Whatever.
” This issue has continued and these days President Lagarde reads from a script written for her which begs the issue of whether the questions from the press corps are known in advance ?
It also begs the issue of who is actually in charge ?
This is all very different from when prompted by an admiring Financial Time representative she was able to describe herself as a “ wise owl ” like her brooch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to change her tune substantially on CNBC later and got a correcting footnote in the minutes .
Next comes her promise to unify the ECB Governing Council and have it singing from the same hymn sheet , unlike the term of her predecessor Mario Draghi .
This has been crumbling over the past day or two as we have received reports of better economic expectations from some ECB members .
This has been solidified by this in Eurofi magazine today .
That is from Klass Knot the head of the DNB or Netherlands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ view are further expunged below .
Also it was only a week ago we were getting reports ( more “ sauces ” ) that the ECB wanted to get the Euro exchange-rate lower .
Whereas so far on announcement day it has talked it up .
There are several issues here of which the first was exemplified by Eurostat on Tuesday .
Such a lurch downwards has these days a duo fold response .
What I mean by that os that central banks have got themselves into the trap of responding to individual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The real issue is where the economy will be by the time the policy response ( more QE and a -1 % interest-rate for banks ) can actually take effect .
I still recall an ECB paper which suggested response times had got longer and not shorter as some try to claim .
Accordingly I can only completely disagree with those who say this should be an influence .
For a start there are ongoing measurement issues and anyway the boat has sailed .
The more thoughtful might wonder how this can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recorded inflation ?
But they are usually ignored .
Next the new optimism rather collides with this from a week ago .
That is for July so in these times a while ago but we also face the prospect of more restrictions and maybe more lock downs .
If we look at the news from France earlier production was better in July but still well below February .
Italy has different numbers but a similar pattern .
We start with two issues which are that some of the ECB are singing along with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ little awkward if you want to talk the currency down as we note the FT has a claimed scoop which catches up with us from a week ago .
Then there is the background issue that Mario Draghi who knows Christine Lagarde well thought he was setting monetary policy for her last autumn when the Deposit Rate was cut to -0.5 % and a reintroduction of QE was announced .
So she would have a year or more to bed in and read up on monetary policy .
What could go wrong ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ me be clear.Appointing a woman to the role was in fact overdue .
The problem is that diversity is supposed to bring new talent of which there are many whereas the establishment only picks ones from their club .
In this instance there were two steps backwards .
The first is simply Christine Lagarde ’ s track record which includes a conviction for negligence .
Next is the fact that the ECB is now headed by two politicians as the reverse takeover completes and it can set about helping current politicians by keeping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The irony is that if you go back to the beginning of this post Christine Lagarde seems to have failed to grasp even that .

by Shaun Richards
Today is ECB ( European Central Bank ) day where we get the results of their latest deliberations. We may get a minor move but essentially it is one for what we have come to call open mouth operations. This is more than a little awkward when the President has already established a reputation for putting her Hermes shod foot in her mouth. Who can forget this from March 12th?
Lagarde: We are not here to close spreads, there are other tools and other actors to deal with these issues.
If you are ever not sure of the date just take a look at a chart of the Italian government bond market as it is the time when the benchmark ten-year yield doubled. As many put it the ECB had gone from “Whatever it takes” to “Whatever.”
This issue has continued and these days President Lagarde reads from a script written for her which begs the issue of whether the questions from the press corps are known in advance? It also begs the issue of who is actually in charge? This is all very different from when prompted by an admiring Financial Time representative she was able to describe herself as a “wise owl” like her brooch. Whoever was in charge got her to change her tune substantially on CNBC later and got a correcting footnote in the minutes.
I am fully committed to avoid any fragmentation in a difficult moment for the euro area. High spreads due to the coronavirus impair the transmission of monetary policy. We will use the flexibility embedded in the asset purchase programme, including within the public sector purchase programme. The package approved today can be used flexibly to avoid dislocations in bond markets, and we are ready to use the necessary determination and strength.
Next comes her promise to unify the ECB Governing Council and have it singing from the same hymn sheet, unlike the term of her predecessor Mario Draghi. This has been crumbling over the past day or two as we have received reports of better economic expectations from some ECB members. This has been solidified by this in Eurofi magazine today.
Now that we have moved past the impact phase of the shock, we can shift our attention toward the recovery phase. Recently, forward looking confidence indicators look robust, while high frequency data suggest that mobility is recovering. These developments solidify the confidence in our baseline projection with a more favorable balance-of-risks. However, even if no further setbacks materialize
economic activity will only approach pre-corona levels at the end of 2022.
That is from Klass Knot the head of the DNB or Netherlands central bank and any doubts about his view are further expunged below.
Relying too heavily on monetary policy to get the job done might have contributed to perceptions of a “central bank put” in the recovery from the euro area debt crisis, where the ECB bore all of the downside risk to the economy.
Might?!
Also it was only a week ago we were getting reports ( more “sauces” ) that the ECB wanted to get the Euro exchange-rate lower. Whereas so far on announcement day it has talked it up.
The Economy
There are several issues here of which the first was exemplified by Eurostat on Tuesday.
The COVID-19 pandemic also had a strong impact on GDP levels. Based on seasonally adjusted figures, GDP
volumes were significantly lower than the highest levels of the fourth quarter of 2019 (-15.1% in the euro area and
-14.3% in the EU). This corresponds to the lowest levels since the the first quarter of 2005 for the euro area.
Such a lurch downwards has these days a duo fold response. What I mean by that os that central banks have got themselves into the trap of responding to individual events which they can do nothing about. The real issue is where the economy will be by the time the policy response ( more QE and a -1% interest-rate for banks) can actually take effect. I still recall an ECB paper which suggested response times had got longer and not shorter as some try to claim.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Accordingly I can only completely disagree with those who say this should be an influence.
In August 2020, a month in which COVID-19 containment measures continued to be lifted, Euro area annual
inflation is expected to be -0.2%, down from 0.4% in July according to a flash estimate from Eurostat,
For a start there are ongoing measurement issues and anyway the boat has sailed. The more thoughtful might wonder how this can happen with all the effort to raise recorded inflation? But they are usually ignored.
Next the new optimism rather collides with this from a week ago.
In July 2020, a month marked by some relaxation of COVID-19 containment measures in many Member States, the seasonally adjusted volume of retail trade decreased by 1.3% in the euro area and by 0.8% in the EU, compared
with June 2020, according to estimates from Eurostat.
That is for July so in these times a while ago but we also face the prospect of more restrictions and maybe more lock downs. If we look at the news from France earlier production was better in July but still well below February.
Compared to February (the last month before the start of the general lockdown), output declined in the manufacturing industry (−7.9%), as well as in the whole industry (−7.1%).
Italy has different numbers but a similar pattern.
In July 2020 the seasonally adjusted industrial production index increased by 7.4% compared with the previous month. The change of the average of the last three months with respect to the previous three months was 15.0%. The calendar adjusted industrial production index decreased by 8.0% compared with July 2019 (calendar working days in July 2020 being the same as in July 2019). The unadjusted industrial production index decreased by 8.0% compared with July 2019.
Comment
We start with two issues which are that some of the ECB are singing along with D:Ream.
Things can only get better
Can only get better if we see it through
That means me and I mean you too.
That is a little awkward if you want to talk the currency down as we note the FT has a claimed scoop which catches up with us from a week ago.
Scoop: For the first time in more than two years, the
@ECB is expected to include a reference to the exchange rate in today’s “introductory statement” – here’s four things to watch for as the euro’s strength raises alarms at the central bank.
Then there is the background issue that Mario Draghi who knows Christine Lagarde well thought he was setting monetary policy for her last autumn when the Deposit Rate was cut to -0.5% and a reintroduction of QE was announced. So she would have a year or more to bed in and read up on monetary policy. What could go wrong?
This is a contentious area so let me be clear.Appointing a woman to the role was in fact overdue. The problem is that diversity is supposed to bring new talent of which there are many whereas the establishment only picks ones from their club. In this instance there were two steps backwards. The first is simply Christine Lagarde’s track record which includes a conviction for negligence. Next is the fact that the ECB is now headed by two politicians as the reverse takeover completes and it can set about helping current politicians by keeping debt costs low and sometimes negative. The irony is that if you go back to the beginning of this post Christine Lagarde seems to have failed to grasp even that.
The Investing Channel


investmentwatchblog--2020-09-10--Disney filmed Mulan in Xinjiang, which is full of concentration camps where political prisoners are

Disney filmed Mulan in Xinjiang, which is full of concentration camps where political prisoners are having their organs harvested

( Natural News ) The Walt Disney Corporation is back in the news after it was revealed that its new live-action remake of Mulan was filmed in Xinjiang , a province in communist China that is jam-packed with Uyghur Muslim concentration camps .
After earlier threatening to cease all business in Georgia due to the state ’ s efforts to protect the lives of the unborn , Disney is now proudly filming movies in partnership with one of the most oppressive regimes in the world .
According to reports , Disney is well aware of the widespread human rights abuses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Muslims and other oppressed people groups are subjected to torture , forced organ harvesting , forced sterilization , forced abortions and other horrors .
But the company appears not to care .
“ This is another terrible example of corporate hypocrisy , ” says David Quinn , director of the Dublin-based Iona Institute for Religion and Society .
“ Disney threatened to boycott Georgia because of its religious freedom law , but then thanks officials in Xinjiang province for their help in making Mulan , even though the worst human rights abuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worst attack on religious freedom is taking place in that province , ” he adds .
“ It is scandalous.
” At no point in time has Disney even addressed the fact that communist China continues to enslave people who resist its tyranny , let alone threaten not to do business there like it did to the state of Georgia .
“ Disney and Marvel are inclusive companies , and although we have had great experiences filming in Georgia , we will plan to take our business elsewhere should any legislation allowing discriminatory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” a Disney spokesperson stated last year .
Disney ’ s inclusivity policies apparently do not apply to Uyghur Muslims , Falun Gong Buddhists , or anyone else on communist China ’ s extermination list .
Not only that , but Disney is actually proud to do business with the Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) , giving “ special thanks ” to eight different government entities in the film ’ s credits , “ including the public security bureau in Turpan , a city in eastern Xinjiang where several re-education camps are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Williams , Ph.D. , for Breitbart News .
Disney also made sure to thank the “ publicity department of CPC Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomy Region Committee , ” which is nothing more than the propaganda department of the CCP in Xinjiang .
Roughly a year ago , the U.S. Department of Commerce ’ s Bureau of Industry and Security made a declaration that the Turpan Municipality Bureau of Public Security , which Disney specifically thanked in Mulan ‘ s credits , is “ acting contrary to the foreign policy interests of the United States.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights violations and abuses in the implementation of China ’ s campaign of repression , mass arbitrary detention , and high-technology surveillance against Uighurs , Kazakhs , and other members of Muslim minority groups , ” according to the Department of Commerce .
The truth of the matter , as stated perfectly by Quinn , is that corporations like Disney “ make moralistic , ‘ woke ’ noises , but they only care about the bottom line.
” Disney is also guilty of catering to CCP interests at the expense of American interests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committing treason .
It almost seems intentional that Disney chose to praise Xinjiang authorities and run production there “ at a time when most of the global discussion about Xinjiang is about appalling mass detention of people outside of any legal process on the basis of their ethnic and religious identity , about forced labor , torture and unparalleled destruction of religious freedom , ” says Human Rights Watch China director Sophie Richardson .
More related news stories about the hypocrisy of multinational corporations like Disney that pretend to care about human rights @ @ @ @ @ @

by: Ethan Huff
(Natural News) The Walt Disney Corporation is back in the news after it was revealed that its new live-action remake of Mulan was filmed in Xinjiang, a province in communist China that is jam-packed with Uyghur Muslim concentration camps.
After earlier threatening to cease all business in Georgia due to the state’s efforts to protect the lives of the unborn, Disney is now proudly filming movies in partnership with one of the most oppressive regimes in the world.
According to reports, Disney is well aware of the widespread human rights abuses taking place in Xinjiang, where millions of Muslims and other oppressed people groups are subjected to torture, forced organ harvesting, forced sterilization, forced abortions and other horrors. But the company appears not to care.
“This is another terrible example of corporate hypocrisy,” says David Quinn, director of the Dublin-based Iona Institute for Religion and Society.
“Disney threatened to boycott Georgia because of its religious freedom law, but then thanks officials in Xinjiang province for their help in making Mulan, even though the worst human rights abuse in the world today, and the worst attack on religious freedom is taking place in that province,” he adds. “It is scandalous.”
Disney offers “special thanks” to communist China in movie credits
At no point in time has Disney even addressed the fact that communist China continues to enslave people who resist its tyranny, let alone threaten not to do business there like it did to the state of Georgia.
“Disney and Marvel are inclusive companies, and although we have had great experiences filming in Georgia, we will plan to take our business elsewhere should any legislation allowing discriminatory practices be signed into state law,” a Disney spokesperson stated last year.
Disney’s inclusivity policies apparently do not apply to Uyghur Muslims, Falun Gong Buddhists, or anyone else on communist China’s extermination list. Not only that, but Disney is actually proud to do business with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), giving “special thanks” to eight different government entities in the film’s credits, “including the public security bureau in Turpan, a city in eastern Xinjiang where several re-education camps are located,” writes Dr. Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D., for Breitbart News.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Disney also made sure to thank the “publicity department of CPC Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomy Region Committee,” which is nothing more than the propaganda department of the CCP in Xinjiang.
Roughly a year ago, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security made a declaration that the Turpan Municipality Bureau of Public Security, which Disney specifically thanked in Mulan‘s credits, is “acting contrary to the foreign policy interests of the United States.”
These contrary actions include “human rights violations and abuses in the implementation of China’s campaign of repression, mass arbitrary detention, and high-technology surveillance against Uighurs, Kazakhs, and other members of Muslim minority groups,” according to the Department of Commerce.
The truth of the matter, as stated perfectly by Quinn, is that corporations like Disney “make moralistic, ‘woke’ noises, but they only care about the bottom line.” Disney is also guilty of catering to CCP interests at the expense of American interests, which could implicate the company in committing treason.
It almost seems intentional that Disney chose to praise Xinjiang authorities and run production there “at a time when most of the global discussion about Xinjiang is about appalling mass detention of people outside of any legal process on the basis of their ethnic and religious identity, about forced labor, torture and unparalleled destruction of religious freedom,” says Human Rights Watch China director Sophie Richardson.
More related news stories about the hypocrisy of multinational corporations like Disney that pretend to care about human rights can be found at Deception.news.
Sources for this article include:
Breitbart.com
NaturalNews.com