investmentwatchblog--2020-10-20--“GLOBAL RISK IS AT A MAXIMUM” – EGON VON GREYERZ ON PALISADE RADIO

In this interview , Egon von Greyerz speaks to Tom Bodrovics from Palisade Radio about the cyclical and repetitive nature of the current economic situation and shares his concerns about increasing debt and central banks ’ response .
“ The world is at a point where the risk is at absolute maximum ” says Egon , stating that a debt implosion is inevitable .
Governments are spending more money than they are receiving and are running deficits .
As has happened throughout history , the response of central banks and governments is to print more money .
But where will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Egon explains how these problems date back to the beginning of the century and previous economic crises , such as the 2006-9 global recession .
According to Egon , we saw the first warning signs in September 2019 , but we ’ re starting to see the real effects now .
Egon goes on to discuss how COVID-19 was the catalyst , but not the cause , for today ’ s events , and how he fears that we are heading for a period of serious decline .
Debt can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ central banks and governments don ’ t seem to understand this fact .
That ’ s why investors need to prepare today for the inevitable decline .
You can also hear Egon talk about

by Egon von Greyerz
In this interview, Egon von Greyerz speaks to Tom Bodrovics from Palisade Radio about the cyclical and repetitive nature of the current economic situation and shares his concerns about increasing debt and central banks’ response.
“The world is at a point where the risk is at absolute maximum” says Egon, stating that a debt implosion is inevitable.
Governments are spending more money than they are receiving and are running deficits. As has happened throughout history, the response of central banks and governments is to print more money. But where will this lead?
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
In this enlightening discussion, Egon explains how these problems date back to the beginning of the century and previous economic crises, such as the 2006-9 global recession. According to Egon, we saw the first warning signs in September 2019, but we’re starting to see the real effects now.
Egon goes on to discuss how COVID-19 was the catalyst, but not the cause, for today’s events, and how he fears that we are heading for a period of serious decline. Debt can’t be fixed with more debt, but central banks and governments don’t seem to understand this fact. That’s why investors need to prepare today for the inevitable decline.
You can also hear Egon talk about
Global debt and systemic risks
Hyperinflation and derivatives
Why gold is incredibly cheap today
China’s role in the future
Matterhorn Asset Management’s ultra-secure private gold vaults in Switzerland


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-20--Powell: Fed open to private sector collaboration in possible digital dollar

Powell : Fed open to private sector collaboration in possible digital dollar Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Monday that the Fed is open to collaborating with the private sector on a possible digital U.S. dollar , but reiterated that the central bank has not committed to actually launching one .
“ We will have lots of conversations with industry and stakeholder engagement , and that ’ ll help us in our work on digital currencies and cross-border payments , ” Powell said in an International Monetary Fund panel .
Powell said private sector initiatives like Facebook ’ s Libra @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in setting up their own digital currencies .
But Powell cautioned that the Fed faces “ difficult policy and operational questions , ” such as the monetary policy implications of a digital dollar .
Powell also listed illicit activity and cyber attacks as risks .
“ I actually do think this is one of those issues where it ’ s more important for the United States to get it right than it is to be first , ” Powell said .
Powell pointed to the importance of the U.S. dollar in the global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the $ 2 trillion Federal Reserve notes in circulation are held outside of the country .
Powell emphasized that any possible digital dollar would serve as a “ complement ” to physical cash — not a replacement .
The U.S. finds itself lagging other countries on payments infrastructure .
The Bank of Mexico last year launched a Cobro Digital ( CoDi ) system that allows users and merchants to transact in digital pesos using QR codes .
The People ’ s Bank of China recently began user testing a digital renminbi , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the internet .
Although the Fed is not committing to launching its own digital currency , the Fed is charging ahead with its efforts to bring real-time payments among financial intermediaries .
Services like Venmo and Cash App offer quick peer-to-peer payments , but check clearing still takes days for funds to arrive at one ’ s checking account because of aged infrastructure connecting the nation ’ s banks .
The Fed hopes to stand up a FedNow system to allow 24/7 real-time payments by 2023 or 2024 .
Kansas City Fed President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the initiative , said the project is “ on track ” with that timeline .
Although many central banks are researching digital currencies , only about 10 % say they will actually issue one of their own in the short-term , according to the Bank of International Settlements .

Source. Article pasted below for convenience.

Powell: Fed open to private sector collaboration in possible digital dollar
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Monday that the Fed is open to collaborating with the private sector on a possible digital U.S. dollar, but reiterated that the central bank has not committed to actually launching one.
“We will have lots of conversations with industry and stakeholder engagement, and that’ll help us in our work on digital currencies and cross-border payments,” Powell said in an International Monetary Fund panel.
Powell said private sector initiatives like Facebook’s Libra project have accelerated central banks’ interest in setting up their own digital currencies.
But Powell cautioned that the Fed faces “difficult policy and operational questions,” such as the monetary policy implications of a digital dollar. Powell also listed illicit activity and cyber attacks as risks.
“I actually do think this is one of those issues where it’s more important for the United States to get it right than it is to be first,” Powell said.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Powell pointed to the importance of the U.S. dollar in the global economy, noting that the majority of the $2 trillion Federal Reserve notes in circulation are held outside of the country.
Powell emphasized that any possible digital dollar would serve as a “complement” to physical cash — not a replacement.

Real-time payments
The U.S. finds itself lagging other countries on payments infrastructure. The Bank of Mexico last year launched a Cobro Digital (CoDi) system that allows users and merchants to transact in digital pesos using QR codes. The People’s Bank of China recently began user testing a digital renminbi, which would allow transactions even without connection to the internet.
Although the Fed is not committing to launching its own digital currency, the Fed is charging ahead with its efforts to bring real-time payments among financial intermediaries. Services like Venmo and Cash App offer quick peer-to-peer payments, but check clearing still takes days for funds to arrive at one’s checking account because of aged infrastructure connecting the nation’s banks.
The Fed hopes to stand up a FedNow system to allow 24/7 real-time payments by 2023 or 2024. Kansas City Fed President Esther George, one of the leaders on the initiative, said the project is “on track” with that timeline.
Although many central banks are researching digital currencies, only about 10% say they will actually issue one of their own in the short-term, according to the Bank of International Settlements.


Millennials Driving Equities?

Help me reconcile two conflicting things .
I ’ m a big fan of Tom Lee ( Fundstrat ) , @ @ @ @ @ written about millennials influence on equities : “ We have asserted that the U.S. is @ @ @ @ @ of the world because of building demographic tailwinds , ” Lee wrote .
“ In @ @ @ @ @ millennials , who are now entering their prime income years .
( Or we can @ @ @ @ @ lots of children ) .
” Another recent report came out regarding how much wealth @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t have much wealth , how can this be driving equities higher ?
@ @ @ @ @ here–the demographics point to an increase in equities due to consumption trends , but the @ @ @ @ @ ideas ?

by nickel_dime
Help me reconcile two conflicting things. I’m a big fan of Tom Lee (Fundstrat), and he’s often written about millennials influence on equities:
“We have asserted that the U.S. is increasingly decoupling from the rest of the world because of building demographic tailwinds,” Lee wrote. “In short, we can thank millennials, who are now entering their prime income years. (Or we can thank their parents for having lots of children).”
Source: www.marketwatch.com/story/we-need-to-thank-millennials-for-the-booming-us-economy-says-fundstrats-tom-lee-2019-12-09
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Another recent report came out regarding how much wealth millennials have:
Millennials Control Just 4.2 Percent of US Wealth, 4 Times Poorer Than Baby Boomers Were At Age 34
Source: www.newsweek.com/millennials-control-just-42-percent-us-wealth-4-times-poorer-baby-boomers-were-age-34-1537638
If millennials don’t have much wealth, how can this be driving equities higher? Or is the issue scale here–the demographics point to an increase in equities due to consumption trends, but the effect is small. Any ideas?


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-20--The Fed Wants the Public to Know It Can Withhold Information Under an Executive Order and Defy Subpo

The Fed Wants the Public to Know It Can Withhold Information Under an Executive Order and Defy Subpoenas from Courts and Congress

The United States is experiencing the worst pandemic since 1918 .
The U.S. economy is experiencing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s .
And the general public is attempting to vote in the most important presidential election of a lifetime with obstacles like fake ballot boxes , 5-hour wait lines , and destroyed mail-sorting machines .
What is the central bank of the United States , the Federal Reserve , doing with its free time at this critical moment ?
It ’ s rewriting its rules for responding to Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After revising the Fed ’ s own FOIA rules earlier this year , the Fed is now rewriting the FOIA rules for the Federal Open Market Committee ( FOMC ) .
That just happens to be the entity in charge of sluicing that cumulative $ 9 trillion to trading houses on Wall Street from September 17 , 2019 through March of this year .
The Fed has yet to release one detail about what specific trading houses got the money and how much each got .
But the Fed is very likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for that information or Congress or the courts issue subpoenas .
Yesterday , the Fed released the details of what it is proposing in changes to its FOIA rules for the FOMC .
The public will have 60 days to submit a comment letter .
( Comments from the public on the proposal can be emailed to FOMCregs.comments @ FRB.gov – include “ Part 271 Rules Regarding Availability of Information ” in the subject line of the message . )
This might be an excellent time for Americans to tell the Fed just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secrecy and stonewalling .
For a primer on that history , see our article : Why Americans Don ’ t Trust the Fed : It ’ s Too Damn Secretive .
While the Fed attempts to give the impression that it is merely shuffling around language that already exists under law , what does pop out is that it is accentuating that it can withhold information based on an “ Executive Order.
” Has President Donald Trump issued such an Executive Order to the Fed ?
The revised paragraph will read as follows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
( a ) Types of records exempt from disclosure .
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C .
552 ( b ) , the following records of the Committee are exempt from disclosure under this part .
( 1 ) Any information that is specifically authorized under criteria established by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and is in fact properly classified pursuant to the executive order .
”

via wallstreetonparade:
The United States is experiencing the worst pandemic since 1918. The U.S. economy is experiencing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. And the general public is attempting to vote in the most important presidential election of a lifetime with obstacles like fake ballot boxes, 5-hour wait lines, and destroyed mail-sorting machines. What is the central bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve, doing with its free time at this critical moment? It’s rewriting its rules for responding to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests from the public and media.
After revising the Fed’s own FOIA rules earlier this year, the Fed is now rewriting the FOIA rules for the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). That just happens to be the entity in charge of sluicing that cumulative $9 trillion to trading houses on Wall Street from September 17, 2019 through March of this year. The Fed has yet to release one detail about what specific trading houses got the money and how much each got. But the Fed is very likely contemplating the day that it is sued for that information or Congress or the courts issue subpoenas.
Yesterday, the Fed released the details of what it is proposing in changes to its FOIA rules for the FOMC. The public will have 60 days to submit a comment letter. (Comments from the public on the proposal can be emailed to FOMCregs.comments@FRB.gov – include “Part 271 Rules Regarding Availability of Information” in the subject line of the message.)
This might be an excellent time for Americans to tell the Fed just what they think about its history of secrecy and stonewalling. For a primer on that history, see our article: Why Americans Don’t Trust the Fed: It’s Too Damn Secretive.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
While the Fed attempts to give the impression that it is merely shuffling around language that already exists under law, what does pop out is that it is accentuating that it can withhold information based on an “Executive Order.” Has President Donald Trump issued such an Executive Order to the Fed?
The revised paragraph will read as follows:
“§ 271.15 Exemptions from disclosure. (a) Types of records exempt from disclosure. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b), the following records of the Committee are exempt from disclosure under this part. (1) Any information that is specifically authorized under criteria established by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and is in fact properly classified pursuant to the executive order.”
…


Stimulus Items Debate

How are households paying for stuff ?
pic.twitter.com/byDPdkYVIJ

How are households paying for stuff? pic.twitter.com/byDPdkYVIJ
— Win Smart, CFA (@WinfieldSmart) October 20, 2020


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-20--QE promotes economic growth. Debate.

QE promotes economic growth. Debate.

The ECB unwillingly creates stagnation in its quest for inflation at any cost .
Inflating the sovereign bond bubble is @ @ @ @ @ from savers to unproductive debt .
Meanwhile , real inflation for consumers , especially the @ @ @ @ @ than official CPI pic.twitter.com/EsJ9TFIyNT

The ECB unwillingly creates stagnation in its quest for inflation at any cost. Inflating the sovereign bond bubble is a massive transfer of wealth from savers to unproductive debt.
Meanwhile, real inflation for consumers, especially the poorest, is much higher than official CPI pic.twitter.com/EsJ9TFIyNT
— Daniel Lacalle (@dlacalle_IA) October 20, 2020


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-20--Wow, look at dividends!

Wow, look at dividends!

Wow, look at dividends! 👇👇👇 pic.twitter.com/jm0XCxUhM1
Philly new orders rolling over again pic.twitter.com/59W2SQtW6A
— Sven Henrich (@NorthmanTrader) October 20, 2020


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-20--Tell me the last time extreme positive sentiment for anything ended well…

Tell me the last time extreme positive sentiment for anything ended well… pic.twitter.com/fbDq2v79HA — Otavio (Tavi) Costa (@TaviCosta) October 19, 2020
MarketWatch: ‘The Dot-Com Bubble on Steroids’ They conclude it's not as bad, but they are wrong, because corp earnings artificially juiced by 11 yrs of avg $1T/yr US deficits, $6T corp buybacks, 0% rates + $30T China credit@RobSKaplan @neelkashkari @RaphaelBostic @marydalyecon pic.twitter.com/onCrTHyiT9 — M/I_Investments (@MI_Investments) October 20, 2020
Equity put/call ratio (10-day moving average) only slightly above 9/2 low pic.twitter.com/oDMEEOjLkO — Liz Ann Sonders (@LizAnnSonders) October 20, 2020


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-20--Yet another warning that makes it clear that we should all be bracing for a major seismic event alon

Yet another warning that makes it clear that we should all be bracing for a major seismic event along the west coast

While most Americans remain completely fixated on the upcoming presidential election , large earthquakes continue to rattle the Ring of Fire at an alarming rate .
On Monday , a magnitude 7.5 quake struck near the little town of Sand Point , Alaska , and it was felt over a very large area .
In fact , it is being reported that shaking could be felt “ as far away as Chugiak , Anchorage and Bethel ” .
Following the initial earthquake , there was a series of very large aftershocks .
As I write this article , there have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ magnitude 4.0 in the region .
By the time most of you read this article , that number will almost certainly be higher .
Sadly , even though we have been witnessing a lot of shaking along the southern coast of Alaska and the west coast of the continental United States in recent months , very few experts seem concerned about the possibility that a very large seismic event could be coming .
But they should be .
Before I get to that , let ’ s talk about what just happened .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ warning for almost everyone living along the southern Alaska coastline , and two relatively small tsunami waves were reported… The good news is that this event did not do a whole lot of damage , but it definitely frightened many of the local residents .
Here is just one example… Candace Nelson , her kids and dogs hid under the table as the earthquake shook Cold Bay , about 90 miles west of Sand Point .
“ My kids are all doing good .
Brooke , Wilder and Scout all huddled under our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” she told CNN as the family waited for more news about the tsunami .
“ The dogs were more concerned as to what the heck we were doing under the table.
” The location where this earthquake happened is not too far from where we witnessed a magnitude 7.8 quake back in July .
Could it be possible that all of this activity is building up to something even larger ?
According to one expert , the area where these quakes have been occurring is right where “ the Pacific Plate actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ … Further south along the Ring of Fire , a swarm of hundreds of earthquakes in southern California was getting international attention just a few weeks ago… I have been warning over and over again that it is just a matter of time before “ the Big One ” finally hits California .
Scientists have told us that the San Andreas Fault has the potential “ to unzip all at once ” , and if that happens it would be a disaster unlike anything that we have ever seen before in all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some portions of southern California could sink by several feet “ relatively instantaneously ” , and that such an event “ could plunge large parts of California into the sea almost instantly ” .
Meanwhile , Steve Quayle and others have been relentlessly sounding the alarm about the Cascadia Subduction Zone .
If a magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck along the Cascadia Subduction Zone right now , it would only take 15 to 20 minutes for the very first tsunami waves to start hitting the coast of Washington .
Oregon State University paleoseismologist Chris @ @ @ @ @ @ @ produce a giant wall of water up to 100 feet high that would utterly destroy everything that it encounters .
In a previous article , I included a quote from the former head of FEMA ’ s Region X about what such a disaster would mean for those living in the Northwest… If the entire zone gives way at once , an event that seismologists call a full-margin rupture , the magnitude will be somewhere between 8.7 and 9.2 .
That ’ s the very big one .
…By the time the shaking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the region will be unrecognizable .
Kenneth Murphy , who directs FEMA ’ s Region X , the division responsible for Oregon , Washington , Idaho , and Alaska , says , “ Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.
” In the Pacific Northwest , everything west of Interstate 5 covers some hundred and forty thousand square miles , including Seattle , Tacoma , Portland , Eugene , Salem ( the capital city of Oregon ) , Olympia ( the capital of Washington ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phrase “ everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast ” has stuck with me ever since I first read that quote .
Scientists assure us that it is just a matter of time before this actually happens , but most people are not taking those warnings very seriously .
And let us not forget that there are several major volcanoes in the Northwest as well .
In particular , I have been deeply concerned about the potential for an eruption of Mt .
Rainier for a very long time .
I once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mt .
Rainier “ the most dangerous mountain in the United States ” , and that statement is definitely still true today .
Scientists tell us that someday a massive eruption of Mt .
Rainier will send super-heated tsunamis of hot mud known as “ lahars ” racing toward highly populated communities in the Northwest at speeds of up to 50 miles per hour .
For many , official warnings will come far too late and they will die before they even realize what hit them .
For the next several months , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the U.S. portion of the Ring of Fire much more carefully than normal .
There has been so much shaking going on already , and an unprecedented disaster could very literally happen at any moment .

by Michael Snyder
While most Americans remain completely fixated on the upcoming presidential election, large earthquakes continue to rattle the Ring of Fire at an alarming rate. On Monday, a magnitude 7.5 quake struck near the little town of Sand Point, Alaska, and it was felt over a very large area. In fact, it is being reported that shaking could be felt “as far away as Chugiak, Anchorage and Bethel”. Following the initial earthquake, there was a series of very large aftershocks. As I write this article, there have already been 19 aftershocks of at least magnitude 4.0 in the region. By the time most of you read this article, that number will almost certainly be higher. Sadly, even though we have been witnessing a lot of shaking along the southern coast of Alaska and the west coast of the continental United States in recent months, very few experts seem concerned about the possibility that a very large seismic event could be coming.
But they should be.
Before I get to that, let’s talk about what just happened. The magnitude 7.5 quake triggered a tsunami warning for almost everyone living along the southern Alaska coastline, and two relatively small tsunami waves were reported…
The magnitude 7.5 earthquake near Sand Point, Alaska, generated a tsunami, Scott Langley with the National Tsunami Warning Center said Monday afternoon. Langley said the tsunami sent two waves, each measuring 130 centimeters (4 feet, 3 inches) high. But observers onshore reported the waves appeared to be 1.5 feet (45.7 centimeters) and 2 feet (61 cm) over high tide.
The good news is that this event did not do a whole lot of damage, but it definitely frightened many of the local residents. Here is just one example…
Candace Nelson, her kids and dogs hid under the table as the earthquake shook Cold Bay, about 90 miles west of Sand Point. “My kids are all doing good. Brooke, Wilder and Scout all huddled under our kitchen table till the shaking stopped,” she told CNN as the family waited for more news about the tsunami. “The dogs were more concerned as to what the heck we were doing under the table.”
The location where this earthquake happened is not too far from where we witnessed a magnitude 7.8 quake back in July.
Could it be possible that all of this activity is building up to something even larger?
According to one expert, the area where these quakes have been occurring is right where “the Pacific Plate actually goes underneath the North American Plate”…
“This is an area where the Pacific Plate is subducting underneath the North American Plate. And because of that, the Pacific Plate actually goes underneath the North American Plate, where it melts,” Caruso said, noting that’s why there are volcanoes in the region.
Further south along the Ring of Fire, a swarm of hundreds of earthquakes in southern California was getting international attention just a few weeks ago…
Hundreds of small earthquakes continue to rattle southern California, sending light shaking into San Diego County, as experts raise the odds that a much larger tremor could strike in the coming days. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reported that hundreds of earthquakes had been reported by Wednesday night in the Salton Trough near Westmorland and more than a dozen more sizeable earthquakes on Thursday.
I have been warning over and over again that it is just a matter of time before “the Big One” finally hits California. Scientists have told us that the San Andreas Fault has the potential “to unzip all at once”, and if that happens it would be a disaster unlike anything that we have ever seen before in all of U.S. history. Experts have warned that some portions of southern California could sink by several feet “relatively instantaneously”, and that such an event “could plunge large parts of California into the sea almost instantly”.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Meanwhile, Steve Quayle and others have been relentlessly sounding the alarm about the Cascadia Subduction Zone. If a magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck along the Cascadia Subduction Zone right now, it would only take 15 to 20 minutes for the very first tsunami waves to start hitting the coast of Washington. Oregon State University paleoseismologist Chris Goldfinger believes that such an event could produce a giant wall of water up to 100 feet high that would utterly destroy everything that it encounters.
In a previous article, I included a quote from the former head of FEMA’s Region X about what such a disaster would mean for those living in the Northwest…
If the entire zone gives way at once, an event that seismologists call a full-margin rupture, the magnitude will be somewhere between 8.7 and 9.2. That’s the very big one. …By the time the shaking has ceased and the tsunami has receded, the region will be unrecognizable. Kenneth Murphy, who directs FEMA’s Region X, the division responsible for Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Alaska, says, “Our operating assumption is that everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast.” In the Pacific Northwest, everything west of Interstate 5 covers some hundred and forty thousand square miles, including Seattle, Tacoma, Portland, Eugene, Salem (the capital city of Oregon), Olympia (the capital of Washington), and some seven million people.
The phrase “everything west of Interstate 5 will be toast” has stuck with me ever since I first read that quote.
Scientists assure us that it is just a matter of time before this actually happens, but most people are not taking those warnings very seriously.
And let us not forget that there are several major volcanoes in the Northwest as well.
In particular, I have been deeply concerned about the potential for an eruption of Mt. Rainier for a very long time. I once wrote an article in which I dubbed Mt. Rainier “the most dangerous mountain in the United States”, and that statement is definitely still true today.
Scientists tell us that someday a massive eruption of Mt. Rainier will send super-heated tsunamis of hot mud known as “lahars” racing toward highly populated communities in the Northwest at speeds of up to 50 miles per hour. For many, official warnings will come far too late and they will die before they even realize what hit them.
For the next several months, I will be watching seismic activity along the U.S. portion of the Ring of Fire much more carefully than normal.
There has been so much shaking going on already, and an unprecedented disaster could very literally happen at any moment.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--YouTube confirms it will immediately ban all videos that question the “official” vaccine narrative p

YouTube confirms it will immediately ban all videos that question the “official” vaccine narrative promoted by the corrupt WHO and vaccine companies

( Natural News ) YouTube just confirmed they will work with the World Health Organization ( WHO ) to remove any videos that question the official vaccine narrative promoted by vaccine companies .
The Stalinist WHO has become nothing more than a Big Pharma front group , advancing the interests of vaccine makers .
The WHO has made Big Tech its echo chamber , selling Big Pharma ’ s immunosuppressants , which includes a long list of vaccines that damage cellular immunity .
There is no longer a shred of transparency surrounding vaccine science because the WHO is strategically eliminating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uses Silicon Valley to censor truths about vaccination The WHO has partnered with Silicon Valley Big Tech giants to weed out any information about vaccine damage , vaccine injury , viral shedding from vaccines , among other serious topics that concern public health .
The WHO is targeting any hopeful information on treatments , preventative nutrition , plant-based medicines , and any information that could advance innate immunity and free human beings from endless vaccine experiments .
This authoritarian organization pays no regard to human rights as their team of vaccine pushers work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine science , its shortcomings , and its sordid history of deadliness .
The scientific method is being suppressed and censored because the WHO demands vaccine obedience , targeting dissenters of vaccines as “ a public health threat.
” The WHO demands wide scale vaccine distribution while ignoring the science on its adverse effects .
This network of vaccine pushers coordinate to ensure that vaccine makers enjoy legal immunity when their products do harm , while censoring any debate about this atrocious reality .
Stalinist WHO coordinates with YouTube to suppress covid-19 vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like the USSR State Committee for Television and Radio Broadcasting , a propaganda and information suppression branch of Joseph Stalin ’ s early 20th century Soviet Union communist empire .
During that time , the Soviet Union controlled the television networks and radio stations with their own political propaganda , while locking down public speaking on important matters of human freedom , and punishing anyone who dared commit “ a slip of the tongue.
” Today , the WHO runs a digital solutions department that meets weekly with the policy teams of Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ led by Andy Pattison , who was open about their effort to censor any information that dampers human belief in upcoming coronavirus vaccines .
He told Reuters that his team meets with YouTube on a weekly basis to discuss content trends online while discussing the types of videos that spread “ dangerous misinformation ” about vaccines .
YouTube recently agreed to limit the spread of covid-19 related information that defies the position of the WHO .
YouTube is in the process of removing videos that question covid-19 vaccines .
YouTube is currently banning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the limitations of these vaccines and their potential to cause great harm .
YouTube is already working with the WHO to remove videos that dispute the “ supreme authority ” guidance provided by public health authorities .
Since February , YouTube has removed over 200,000 videos questioning the covid-19 status quo .
No one can post content that tells the truth about junky , non-specific coronavirus tests .
No one can post videos about the absurdities of contact tracing of healthy people and the constant shutting down of society over virus fears .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ social distancing and the mass mental illness of expecting people to follow arrows on the floor .
No one can dispute mandatory masking , or speak out about the negative psychological effects that these mass medical edicts have on everyone .
To make matters worse , no one can question vaccines at all , even though they are being rushed into existence , with numerous accounts of vaccine recipients suffering from adverse events , both mild and severe .
The WHO controls world democracy now , punishing thought , mocking scientific integrity and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Big Vaccine propaganda and censoring out the truth .
It ’ s a medical fascist takeover and the casualties will continue to mount , as important information is buried , smart people silenced .

by: Lance D Johnson
(Natural News) YouTube just confirmed they will work with the World Health Organization (WHO) to remove any videos that question the official vaccine narrative promoted by vaccine companies.
The Stalinist WHO has become nothing more than a Big Pharma front group, advancing the interests of vaccine makers. The WHO has made Big Tech its echo chamber, selling Big Pharma’s immunosuppressants, which includes a long list of vaccines that damage cellular immunity. There is no longer a shred of transparency surrounding vaccine science because the WHO is strategically eliminating any dissent about vaccination online.
WHO uses Silicon Valley to censor truths about vaccination
The WHO has partnered with Silicon Valley Big Tech giants to weed out any information about vaccine damage, vaccine injury, viral shedding from vaccines, among other serious topics that concern public health. The WHO is targeting any hopeful information on treatments, preventative nutrition, plant-based medicines, and any information that could advance innate immunity and free human beings from endless vaccine experiments. This authoritarian organization pays no regard to human rights as their team of vaccine pushers work to bury information that is critical of vaccine science, its shortcomings, and its sordid history of deadliness.
The scientific method is being suppressed and censored because the WHO demands vaccine obedience, targeting dissenters of vaccines as “a public health threat.” The WHO demands wide scale vaccine distribution while ignoring the science on its adverse effects. This network of vaccine pushers coordinate to ensure that vaccine makers enjoy legal immunity when their products do harm, while censoring any debate about this atrocious reality.
Stalinist WHO coordinates with YouTube to suppress covid-19 vaccine concerns
The modern-day World Health Organization is like the USSR State Committee for Television and Radio Broadcasting, a propaganda and information suppression branch of Joseph Stalin’s early 20th century Soviet Union communist empire. During that time, the Soviet Union controlled the television networks and radio stations with their own political propaganda, while locking down public speaking on important matters of human freedom, and punishing anyone who dared commit “a slip of the tongue.”
Today, the WHO runs a digital solutions department that meets weekly with the policy teams of Big Tech. This dictatorial WHO department is led by Andy Pattison, who was open about their effort to censor any information that dampers human belief in upcoming coronavirus vaccines. He told Reuters that his team meets with YouTube on a weekly basis to discuss content trends online while discussing the types of videos that spread “dangerous misinformation” about vaccines. YouTube recently agreed to limit the spread of covid-19 related information that defies the position of the WHO. YouTube is in the process of removing videos that question covid-19 vaccines. YouTube is currently banning channels and any videos that point out the limitations of these vaccines and their potential to cause great harm.
YouTube is already working with the WHO to remove videos that dispute the “supreme authority” guidance provided by public health authorities. Since February, YouTube has removed over 200,000 videos questioning the covid-19 status quo. No one can post content that tells the truth about junky, non-specific coronavirus tests. No one can post videos about the absurdities of contact tracing of healthy people and the constant shutting down of society over virus fears. No one can question the worthlessness of social distancing and the mass mental illness of expecting people to follow arrows on the floor. No one can dispute mandatory masking, or speak out about the negative psychological effects that these mass medical edicts have on everyone. To make matters worse, no one can question vaccines at all, even though they are being rushed into existence, with numerous accounts of vaccine recipients suffering from adverse events, both mild and severe.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
The WHO controls world democracy now, punishing thought, mocking scientific integrity and progress by infiltrating the internet with its Big Vaccine propaganda and censoring out the truth. It’s a medical fascist takeover and the casualties will continue to mount, as important information is buried, smart people silenced.
Sources include:
Reuters.com
NaturalNews.com
NaturalNews.com
Journals.SagePub.com
Vaccines.News


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--Deep State Remains Fully In Charge As DOJ Ignores Trump’s Order To Declassify All “Russian Collusion

Deep State Remains Fully In Charge As DOJ Ignores Trump’s Order To Declassify All “Russian Collusion” Docs

( Natural News ) It ’ s been blatantly obvious for years now that the deep state involving elements of the Justice Department and FBI , the ‘ mainstream ’ media and the intelligence community were involved in a seditious plot to overthrow President Donald Trump .
The plot , devised by none other than Hillary Clinton during the 2016 campaign ( probably when it became obvious to her internal polling staff she wasn ’ t going to win the election ) , involved multiple players from several agencies .
Their names are familiar now : Barack Obama , Joe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , John Brennan , Peter Strzok , Andy McCabe , Lisa Page , Bruce Ohr , Glenn Simpson .
But now that they ’ ve at least been outed , not indicted ( yet ) , and President Trump has Attorney General William Barr overseeing the Justice Department , things are on the right track again , right ?
Earlier this fall when it became apparent that no one who is primarily responsible for the sedition was going to be held to account , the president began authorizing Director of National Intelligence John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ material related to the Russian collusion and “ Spygate ” scandals as possible without legitimately harming U.S. national security .
Ratcliffe began doing that , which is how America learned that Clinton was behind the collusion hoax .
But suddenly , as more documents and more damning evidence began to expose more deep state figures , someone from inside threw a wrench into the declassification process , as Big League Politics reported last week : The Department of Justice ( DOJ ) is overruling President Donald Trump ’ s declaration that all Russia-gate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The DOJ made it clear … that President Trump has no real power , and the deep state remains fully in charge .
As such , their secrets will be protected , and the American public will stay in the dark .
DOJ attorneys told a judge that the White House Counsel ’ s Office effectively told DOJ to disregard Trump ’ s tweets on the matter .
They weren ’ t accompanied by an actual declassification order , and DOJ will proceed as though the tweets hadn ’ t occurred , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its discretion .
… The tweet drew immediate accolades from some of Trump ’ s closest allies , who have long claimed hidden documents would expose the Russia investigation as a politically motivated assault on the Trump presidency .
But DOJ made clear that Trump ’ s pronouncement had no actual force .
“ The White House Counsel ’ s Office informed the Department that there is no order requiring wholesale declassification or disclosure of documents at issue in this matter , ” Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer wrote in a filing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who had ordered the Justice Department to clarify its position following the president ’ s tweets .
Now , a tweet isn ’ t an order — got it .
But we have to believe that Trump ’ s tweet reflects a verbal or written order to declassify documents related to the separate investigations , both of which turned out to be bogus ( given that even James Comey suggested that Hillary had broken national security laws by mishandling classified emails by routing them through her own personal , and unsecured , email @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t going to be prosecuted for it ) .
And if the president did give a verbal or written order to have all related materials declassified , 1 ) Why would a federal judge need ‘ clarification ’ of it ; and 2 ) why would ’ t the DoJ simply follow the orders given by the chief of the Executive Branch , to whom the DoJ answers ?
The only thing that makes sense is that this is nothing more than the same , old stalling tactics and outright insubordination from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ itself from exposure by a president dedicated to forcing them out into the open .
If for no other reason , that one alone is why Trump should be given another four years .

by JD Heyes via Natural News
(Natural News) It’s been blatantly obvious for years now that the deep state involving elements of the Justice Department and FBI, the ‘mainstream’ media and the intelligence community were involved in a seditious plot to overthrow President Donald Trump.
The plot, devised by none other than Hillary Clinton during the 2016 campaign (probably when it became obvious to her internal polling staff she wasn’t going to win the election), involved multiple players from several agencies.
Their names are familiar now: Barack Obama, Joe Biden, James Comey, James Clapper, John Brennan, Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Glenn Simpson.
But now that they’ve at least been outed, not indicted (yet), and President Trump has Attorney General William Barr overseeing the Justice Department, things are on the right track again, right?
Wrong.
Earlier this fall when it became apparent that no one who is primarily responsible for the sedition was going to be held to account, the president began authorizing Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe to begin to declassify as much material related to the Russian collusion and “Spygate” scandals as possible without legitimately harming U.S. national security.
Ratcliffe began doing that, which is how America learned that Clinton was behind the collusion hoax.
But suddenly, as more documents and more damning evidence began to expose more deep state figures, someone from inside threw a wrench into the declassification process, as Big League Politics reported last week:
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is overruling President Donald Trump’s declaration that all Russia-gate documents are to be declassified without redactions.
The DOJ made it clear … that President Trump has no real power, and the deep state remains fully in charge. As such, their secrets will be protected, and the American public will stay in the dark.
I have fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents pertaining to the single greatest political CRIME in American History, the Russia Hoax. Likewise, the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal. No redactions! t.co/GgnHh9GOiq — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 7, 2020
Added Politico:
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
DOJ attorneys told a judge that the White House Counsel’s Office effectively told DOJ to disregard Trump’s tweets on the matter. They weren’t accompanied by an actual declassification order, and DOJ will proceed as though the tweets hadn’t occurred, continuing to redact and release documents at its discretion. …
The tweet drew immediate accolades from some of Trump’s closest allies, who have long claimed hidden documents would expose the Russia investigation as a politically motivated assault on the Trump presidency. But DOJ made clear that Trump’s pronouncement had no actual force.
“The White House Counsel’s Office informed the Department that there is no order requiring wholesale declassification or disclosure of documents at issue in this matter,” Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer wrote in a filing with U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, who had ordered the Justice Department to clarify its position following the president’s tweets.
Now, a tweet isn’t an order — got it. But we have to believe that Trump’s tweet reflects a verbal or written order to declassify documents related to the separate investigations, both of which turned out to be bogus (given that even James Comey suggested that Hillary had broken national security laws by mishandling classified emails by routing them through her own personal, and unsecured, email server, but that she wasn’t going to be prosecuted for it).
And if the president did give a verbal or written order to have all related materials declassified, 1) Why would a federal judge need ‘clarification’ of it; and 2) why would’t the DoJ simply follow the orders given by the chief of the Executive Branch, to whom the DoJ answers?
The only thing that makes sense is that this is nothing more than the same, old stalling tactics and outright insubordination from the deep state that is continuing to protect itself from exposure by a president dedicated to forcing them out into the open.
If for no other reason, that one alone is why Trump should be given another four years.
Sources include:
LegalInsurrection.com
Politico.com
BigLeaguePolitics.com
NaturalNews.com


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--Apple’s (AAPL) Smartphones Are not the Most Popular in the World, despite Apple Being the Only Tech

Apple’s (AAPL) Smartphones Are not the Most Popular in the World, despite Apple Being the Only Tech Company with $2 Trillion Market Cap

Despite this , it is Apple that is the only technology company with a market capitalization of over $ 2 @ @ @ @ @ the 4th largest stock market in terms of total market capitalization .
Apple held a @ @ @ @ @ .
The main sensation , of course , was the presentation of the iPhone 12 @ @ @ @ @ first 5G smartphone .
Even though analysts placed high stakes on the company ’ s @ @ @ @ @ run , the presentation itself did not generate much interest among investors in the market @ @ @ @ @ the company ’ s shares rose by 6 % , but after it , they @ @ @ @ @ within a couple of days .
At the moment , the decline continues .

Despite this, it is Apple that is the only technology company with a market capitalization of over $ 2 trillion. Apple is now the 4th largest stock market in terms of total market capitalization.
Apple’s Presentation Didn’t Lead to the Stock Price Growth
Apple held a new product launch last week. The main sensation, of course, was the presentation of the iPhone 12, the world’s first 5G smartphone. Even though analysts placed high stakes on the company’s new iPhone in a long run, the presentation itself did not generate much interest among investors in the market. Before the presentation, the company’s shares rose by 6%, but after it, they fell to their previous price within a couple of days. At the moment, the decline continues.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--Middle-East peace in jeopardy if the US opts for the ‘establishment orthodoxy’ of Biden

The move towards Middle-Eastern peace is in jeopardy if the US “ opts for the establishment orthodoxy of Joe Biden next month , ” says Sky News host Chris Kenny .
A delegation of Israeli students and tourism officials recently boarded a flight to the United Arab Emirates from Israel following a mutual recognition to normalise relations between both the UAE and Bahrain , with Israel in Washington last month .
The deal was overseen by US President Donald Trump whose Middle-East diplomacy was crucial in the landmark development .
“ There is a long way to go for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is just another area of his success that most of the media ignores , ” Mr Kenny said .
“ And it ’ s an area of advancement that just might be at risk if the US opts for the establishment orthodoxy of Joe Biden next month.
” The flight was the first Etihad Airlines flight to land in Tel Aviv and was expected to become a regular shuttle from Abu Dhabi and other airports in the UAE to Israel .
“ These flights , of course , demonstrate the normalisation of relations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr Kenny said .
Mr Kenny said it was “ one short flight and safe landing for a Boeing Dreamliner , but one giant leap for peace in the Middle-East ” .

The move towards Middle-Eastern peace is in jeopardy if the US “opts for the establishment orthodoxy of Joe Biden next month,” says Sky News host Chris Kenny.
A delegation of Israeli students and tourism officials recently boarded a flight to the United Arab Emirates from Israel following a mutual recognition to normalise relations between both the UAE and Bahrain, with Israel in Washington last month.
The deal was overseen by US President Donald Trump whose Middle-East diplomacy was crucial in the landmark development.
“There is a long way to go for the Middle-East, but Trump’s progress is just another area of his success that most of the media ignores,” Mr Kenny said.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
“And it’s an area of advancement that just might be at risk if the US opts for the establishment orthodoxy of Joe Biden next month.”
The flight was the first Etihad Airlines flight to land in Tel Aviv and was expected to become a regular shuttle from Abu Dhabi and other airports in the UAE to Israel.
“These flights, of course, demonstrate the normalisation of relations between the UAE and Israel,” Mr Kenny said.
Mr Kenny said it was “one short flight and safe landing for a Boeing Dreamliner, but one giant leap for peace in the Middle-East”.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--DoJ, DHS New Rule Bars Asylum for Convicted Felons, Drunk Drivers, Gang Members, Other Criminal Alie

DoJ, DHS New Rule Bars Asylum for Convicted Felons, Drunk Drivers, Gang Members, Other Criminal Aliens (JUSTICE.GOV)

Today , the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security announced the publication of a Final Rule amending their respective regulations to prevent certain categories of criminal aliens from obtaining asylum in the United States .
The rule takes effect 30 days after publication of the Final Rule in the Federal Register , which is scheduled to occur on Wednesday , Oct. 21 .
Asylum is a discretionary immigration benefit that generally can be sought by eligible aliens who are physically present or arriving in the United States , irrespective of their status , as provided in section @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( INA ) , 8 U.S.C .
§ 1158 .
However , in the INA , Congress barred certain categories of aliens from receiving asylum .
In addition to the statutory bars , Congress delegated to the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to establish by regulation additional bars on asylum eligibility to the extent they are consistent with the asylum statute , as well as to establish “ any other conditions or limitations on the consideration of an application for asylum ” that are consistent with the INA @

Today, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security announced the publication of a Final Rule amending their respective regulations to prevent certain categories of criminal aliens from obtaining asylum in the United States. The rule takes effect 30 days after publication of the Final Rule in the Federal Register, which is scheduled to occur on Wednesday, Oct. 21.
Asylum is a discretionary immigration benefit that generally can be sought by eligible aliens who are physically present or arriving in the United States, irrespective of their status, as provided in section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1158. However, in the INA, Congress barred certain categories of aliens from receiving asylum. In addition to the statutory bars, Congress delegated to the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to establish by regulation additional bars on asylum eligibility to the extent they are consistent with the asylum statute, as well as to establish “any other conditions or limitations on the consideration of an application for asylum” that are consistent with the INA.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
www.justice.gov/opa/pr/departments-justice-and-homeland-security-publish-final-rule-restrict-certain-criminal-aliens


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--Twitter Nuked Retweets Until After The Election!

Twitter is temporarily changing how users can retweet during the final stretch of the election , a move which the @ @ @ @ @ spread of false information .
The website changes announced on Oct. 9 are being implemented @ @ @ @ @ the platform began suppressing blockbuster reporting from the New York Post publishing compromising information of @ @ @ @ @ .
Starting Tuesday , users who go to retweet will instead by taken to the @ @ @ @ @ prompting users to comment on the content being re-posted on their own feeds .
“ @ @ @ @ @ friction for those who simply want to Retweet , we hope it will encourage everyone @ @ @ @ @ they are amplifying a Tweet , but also increase the likelihood that people add their @ @ @ @ @ perspectives to the conversation , ” the company explained .

Twitter is temporarily changing how users can retweet during the final stretch of the election, a move which the company says will discourage the spread of false information. The website changes announced on Oct. 9 are being implemented less than a week after the platform began suppressing blockbuster reporting from the New York Post publishing compromising information of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
Starting Tuesday, users who go to retweet will instead by taken to the “Quote Tweet” box prompting users to comment on the content being re-posted on their own feeds.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
“Though this adds some extra friction for those who simply want to Retweet, we hope it will encourage everyone to not only consider why they are amplifying a Tweet, but also increase the likelihood that people add their own thoughts, reactions and perspectives to the conversation,” the company explained.
thefederalist.com/2020/10/20/twitter-is-nuking-retweets-until-after-the-election/


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--CHARLES LIPSON: Recent news about Hunter Biden’s emails puts our country’s institutions in a harsh s

CHARLES LIPSON: Recent news about Hunter Biden’s emails puts our country’s institutions in a harsh spotlight.

Since the New York Post story broke last Wednesday , the Biden campaign has been curiously silent .
Reporters expected swift denials that the computer was Hunter ’ s and that the emails were his .
Crickets .
Crickets , too , about the Cooney emails .
Instead , the Biden campaign has maintained strict radio silence , like Allied ships traversing the North Atlantic during World War II .
Loose lips might sink Biden ’ s ship of state .
So far , the former vice president ’ s only public comment has been to snarl at a CBS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It was all a “ smear , ” Biden said .
Other reporters didn ’ t even bother to ask or questioned the story ’ s sources and moved on .
George Stephanopoulos of ABC News conducted a 90-minute town hall with Biden after the Post story broke and never raised the issue .
Nor did Biden himself raise it so he could swat it down as false .
The mainstream media has buried the story , as have the country ’ s two social media giants .
Twitter initially blocked links to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changing tack and allowing it to be shared .
The company has still blocked the Post ’ s Twitter account until it withdraws the links to the story , which it has so far refused to do .
Meanwhile , Facebook publicly flagged the Post story for review , which normally reduces readership by 80 % .
Attempts to smother a major political news story like this , published in a major newspaper , are unprecedented .
One major Biden ally has come forward to defend his party ’ s candidate .
Adam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the House Select Committee on Intelligence , says flatly that the Delaware emails are a Russian disinformation campaign .
Other Democrats have backed him up .
Prominent mainstream news outlets haven ’ t gone that far , although they have dropped hints to support Biden and Schiff , saying the “ FBI is investigating ” whether the emails are Russian disinformation .
The implication is , “ It ’ s questionable.
” Is there any basis for these claims of fraud and disinformation ?
None , so far .

via discoursemagazine:
Since the New York Post story broke last Wednesday, the Biden campaign has been curiously silent. Reporters expected swift denials that the computer was Hunter’s and that the emails were his. Crickets. Crickets, too, about the Cooney emails.
Instead, the Biden campaign has maintained strict radio silence, like Allied ships traversing the North Atlantic during World War II. Loose lips might sink Biden’s ship of state. So far, the former vice president’s only public comment has been to snarl at a CBS reporter who dared raise the question. It was all a “smear,” Biden said. Other reporters didn’t even bother to ask or questioned the story’s sources and moved on. George Stephanopoulos of ABC News conducted a 90-minute town hall with Biden after the Post story broke and never raised the issue. Nor did Biden himself raise it so he could swat it down as false. The mainstream media has buried the story, as have the country’s two social media giants. Twitter initially blocked links to the New York Post story before eventually changing tack and allowing it to be shared. The company has still blocked the Post’s Twitter account until it withdraws the links to the story, which it has so far refused to do. Meanwhile, Facebook publicly flagged the Post story for review, which normally reduces readership by 80%. Attempts to smother a major political news story like this, published in a major newspaper, are unprecedented.
One major Biden ally has come forward to defend his party’s candidate. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who chairs the House Select Committee on Intelligence, says flatly that the Delaware emails are a Russian disinformation campaign. Other Democrats have backed him up. Prominent mainstream news outlets haven’t gone that far, although they have dropped hints to support Biden and Schiff, saying the “FBI is investigating” whether the emails are Russian disinformation. The implication is, “It’s questionable.”
Is there any basis for these claims of fraud and disinformation? None, so far.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--S&P 500 is gradually declining, bulls are holding the defense.

Sven Henrich , market analyst and founder of NorthmanTrader.com , notes that at the moment the S & P 500 index , which includes the 500 largest US companies , has dropped to the support line at about 3430 points .
At the same time , Mr. Henrich states that the S & P 500 managed to rebound from the 5-week Exponential moving average line , which formed the long-term support line for the index chart .
The analyst already noted yesterday that the S & P 500 is at the long-term support level .
Today , fortunately for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5-week exponential moving average support line .
Exponential moving average is one of the varieties of the Moving Average technical indicator .
Unlike its simpler cousin , the SMA , in which each trading day has the same weight , Exponential moving average gives more weight to recent price fluctuations , giving them more weight in the equation .
In general , the Moving Average family of technical indicators is used to clear a long-term trend in the market from rather insignificant short-term up and down fluctuations in the price of an asset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the continuing decline this week is the lack of positive news on prolonged economic stimulus for the economy .
Two political parties in the United States are unable to agree on a new stimulus package ahead of the presidential election .
Earlier , President Trump has already spoken out that his party will not discuss new measures to support the economy with the Democrats until he wins the elections in early November .

by Saad Ullah
S&P 500 Is at Support Line
Sven Henrich, market analyst and founder of NorthmanTrader.com, notes that at the moment the S&P 500 index, which includes the 500 largest US companies, has dropped to the support line at about 3430 points.
Bulls defend the back test support. $SPXSven Henrich via Twitter
Image Source: Twitter @NorthmanTrader
At the same time, Mr. Henrich states that the S&P 500 managed to rebound from the 5-week Exponential moving average line, which formed the long-term support line for the index chart. We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
$SPX bounces off of weekly 5 EMA support.Sven Henrich via Twitter
Image Source: Twitter @NorthmanTrader
The analyst already noted yesterday that the S&P 500 is at the long-term support level. Today, fortunately for the bulls, the index bounced off the 5-week exponential moving average support line.
What Is EMA Indicator
Exponential moving average is one of the varieties of the Moving Average technical indicator. Unlike its simpler cousin, the SMA, in which each trading day has the same weight, Exponential moving average gives more weight to recent price fluctuations, giving them more weight in the equation. In general, the Moving Average family of technical indicators is used to clear a long-term trend in the market from rather insignificant short-term up and down fluctuations in the price of an asset.
One of the main reasons for the continuing decline this week is the lack of positive news on prolonged economic stimulus for the economy. Two political parties in the United States are unable to agree on a new stimulus package ahead of the presidential election. Earlier, President Trump has already spoken out that his party will not discuss new measures to support the economy with the Democrats until he wins the elections in early November.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--A Blue Wave is Bullish?

A Blue Wave is Bullish?

It seems very strange that Trump was seen as being bullish for stocks , but Wall Street is trying to claim a Blue Wave will be even more bullish under Biden .
Even the economist at Bank of America said the best scenario for the stock markets was a Democratic Party clean sweep .
This seems to be the talk around Wall Street these days .
Perhaps they just want to think positively .
We have laid out all the computer arrays based on the popular vote , Electoral College , the Senate , House , and provided the model @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clearly showing a major trend change is coming in 2022 .
Even if a “ Blue Wave ” steals the election , there is NO WAY they will hold on beyond 2022 .
There is ABSOLUTELY no way we are headed back to normal .
This is NOT going away .
They are pushing for Digital Currencies very rapidly .
The target is still by January 1st .
They will default on the debt outside the country by converting everything to perpetual bonds .
They may increase the interest rate to some small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply declare this as capital .
It will clean the balance sheets and allow them to start over again with normal interest rates set by credit risk .
We have reached the end of an era .
There remains a serious risk depending on where the market closes for year-end , but we are staring in the eyes of rising rates on the 10-year level across the board in European debt with the dramatic expansion of the ECB balance sheet .
It is smelling like the end is near and we may see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the next three years .
The pundits from Wall Street rarely get this right .
They also tend to project the market from a fundamental perspective .
If anything , 2020 is a major game-changer regardless of who wins the elections .
This is not going back to the pre-COIVID normal .
It will also not be what the majority think .

by Martin Armstrong
It seems very strange that Trump was seen as being bullish for stocks, but Wall Street is trying to claim a Blue Wave will be even more bullish under Biden. Even the economist at Bank of America said the best scenario for the stock markets was a Democratic Party clean sweep. This seems to be the talk around Wall Street these days. Perhaps they just want to think positively.
We have laid out all the computer arrays based on the popular vote, Electoral College, the Senate, House, and provided the model on every state. The models are clearly showing a major trend change is coming in 2022. Even if a “Blue Wave” steals the election, there is NO WAY they will hold on beyond 2022.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
There is ABSOLUTELY no way we are headed back to normal. This is NOT going away. They are pushing for Digital Currencies very rapidly. The target is still by January 1st. They will default on the debt outside the country by converting everything to perpetual bonds. They may increase the interest rate to some small positive yield. The central banks will simply declare this as capital. It will clean the balance sheets and allow them to start over again with normal interest rates set by credit risk.
We have reached the end of an era. There remains a serious risk depending on where the market closes for year-end, but we are staring in the eyes of rising rates on the 10-year level across the board in European debt with the dramatic expansion of the ECB balance sheet. It is smelling like the end is near and we may see a complete reversal of the trend unfolding for the next three years.
The pundits from Wall Street rarely get this right. They also tend to project the market from a fundamental perspective. If anything, 2020 is a major game-changer regardless of who wins the elections. This is not going back to the pre-COIVID normal. It will also not be what the majority think.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--Black Americans chanting “we want Trump” and “drain the swamp” the media won’t talk about it.

Wow , what am I seeing here , Black Americans chanting `` we want Trump '' and `` drain the @ @ @ @ @ n't talk about it .
Please Retweet !
pic.twitter.com/hdy0VETHI7 BREAKING : @ RudyGiuliani announces he @ @ @ @ @ hard drive to Delaware State Police due to pictures of underage girls and inappropriate text @ @ @ @ @ never hear about @ realDonaldTrump administration ’ s work to combat human trafficking ?
Wonder @ @ @ @ @ about @ realDonaldTrump administration ’ s work to combat human trafficking ?
Today Trump Admin @ @ @ @ @ Center For Countering Human Trafficking in the US .
They asked if the press had @ @ @ @ @ what happened… *crickets* pic.twitter.com/lio4BwWoKi

Wow, what am I seeing here, Black Americans chanting "we want Trump" and "drain the swamp" the media won't talk about it. Please Retweet! pic.twitter.com/hdy0VETHI7
BREAKING: @RudyGiuliani announces he has turned over Hunter Biden hard drive to Delaware State Police due to pictures of underage girls and inappropriate text messages
Wonder why the you never hear about @realDonaldTrump administration’s work to combat human trafficking?
Wonder why the you never hear about @realDonaldTrump administration’s work to combat human trafficking?
Today Trump Admin announced the first Govt. Center For Countering Human Trafficking in the US. They asked if the press had any questions.
This is what happened… *crickets* pic.twitter.com/lio4BwWoKi
— Matriarch (@imatriarch) October 20, 2020


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--V-Shaped Recovery In Housing Starts/Permits To Build (1-unit Starts Up 8.52% In September)

The housing starts numbers for September were released this morning and point to a V-shaped recovery for housing markets .
@ @ @ @ @ 8.52 % and permits to build were up 7.8 % .
This is a V-shaped @ @ @ @ @ .
Unfortunately , there is no V-shaped recovery in 5+ unit multifamily housing .
But @ @ @ @ @ a distinct v-shaped recovery , according to The Atlanta Fed GDPNow forecast model .

by confoundedinterest17
The housing starts numbers for September were released this morning and point to a V-shaped recovery for housing markets. 1 unit starts were up 8.52% and permits to build were up 7.8%.
This is a V-shaped recovery for single family housing.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Unfortunately, there is no V-shaped recovery in 5+ unit multifamily housing.
But the overall economy is showing a distinct v-shaped recovery, according to The Atlanta Fed GDPNow forecast model.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--Maybe Trump or Biden Winning Is Good for Stocks

Five months ago , people thought that Joe Biden would be bad for stocks , because , well , higher taxes .
That seemed reasonable—every other election in recent history had an effect on markets due to projected changes in tax policy .
Remember 2004 ?
The stock market thought that John Kerry would raise taxes on dividends .
When Bush won , dividend stocks were off to the races .
Today , people think that Biden will be good for stocks , because of stimulus and infrastructure spending .
Everyone is talking about how a “ blue wave ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up on the short thesis due to taxes .
Here ’ s an alternative take : maybe Trump or Biden winning is good for stocks .
Maybe getting the election out of the way is good for stocks .
Maybe stocks rally no matter what happens .
These things are always obvious in hindsight .
The 2016 election was incredibly obvious in hindsight .
But in the months leading up to it , we did the same game theory simulations .
And , at the end of the day , nobody got it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this right , either .
Anyone who says they know with certainty what is going to happen is suffering from overconfidence or is a charlatan .
Or both .
Maybe nothing happens !
Maybe the stock market is unch after the election .
Ultimately , this comes down to an exercise in risk management .
There are stocks that will clearly do well if Biden wins , and there are stocks that will clearly do well if Trump wins .
Own a little bit of both .
Own some bonds , some gold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may seem like a nihilistic approach , but my experience is that the more people are looking at an opportunity , the less of an opportunity it is .
The trend in tax policy is toward increasing progressivity , the idea that rich people pay more than poor people .
The tax code has become increasingly progressive since 1988 , when there were only two tax brackets : • One bracket at 15 % , for incomes up to $ 29,750 , and • Another bracket at 28 % , for incomes over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dollars , $ 29,750 is about $ 62,000 .
I would like to go back to those days .
My quibble with our current system of taxation is not the absolute level of rates ; it ’ s the progressivity .
It ’ s not so much that people are paying a lot on the high end—it ’ s also that people aren ’ t paying very much on the low end .
As you travel around Europe , taxes are high , for sure .
But on the low end , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Everyone has skin in the game .
Here , people with lower incomes do not have much of a financial stake in what goes on in the country .
The problem is that , regardless of whether Biden or Trump wins , you can bet the tax code will become even more progressive .
This is bad for democracy .
Many years ago , Dennis Gartman observed that fewer and fewer people had any tax liability at all—a number approaching 50 % .
What would happen , he asked , if the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote higher taxes on the top 50 % ?
We are there .
Although that ’ s not what ’ s happening—this election is split on income and education , but in reverse .
Counterintuitively , people with lower incomes are not voting for higher taxes—it ’ s the people with higher incomes .
It ’ s an urban legend that rich people tend to vote Republican—they really don ’ t , especially not now .
Whatever you believe about the accuracy of the polls , I firmly believe that stocks are pricing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the Invesco Solar ETF ( TAN ) .
It would not be shooting up if Trump were priced in .
The fund is frontrunning a lot of spending on climate change initiatives , which Biden has pledged $ 2 trillion toward .
If Biden is priced in , and Biden wins , the stock market is unlikely to do much .
In fact , there may be a “ sell the news ” event , which is usually what happens after everyone piles into a trade .
If Trump wins , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much like what happened in 2016 .
And if the election is contested in any way , I doubt it will create much market turmoil , as everyone seems to be hedged for that possibility .
I ’ ve traded through five elections , and you can not draw any generalizations from any of them .
All you can do is plan for asymmetry in positioning .
It ’ s like betting on horses—you can bet on the long shot , and it ’ s fun , but you won ’ t win @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the favorite , which is boring , and you won ’ t win very much , but you ’ ll win more often .
Jared Dillian is an investment strategist at Mauldin Economics , a former head of ETF trading at Lehman Brothers , and the author of The Awesome Portfolio .
Subscribe to his weekly investment newsletter , The 10th Man , and listen to his daily radio program , “ The Jared Dillian Show.
” You can follow Jared on Twitter @ dailydirtnap .

by Jared Dillian
Five months ago, people thought that Joe Biden would be bad for stocks, because, well, higher taxes.
That seemed reasonable—every other election in recent history had an effect on markets due to projected changes in tax policy.
Remember 2004? The stock market thought that John Kerry would raise taxes on dividends. When Bush won, dividend stocks were off to the races.
Today, people think that Biden will be good for stocks, because of stimulus and infrastructure spending. Everyone is talking about how a “blue wave” is good for stocks, having given up on the short thesis due to taxes.
Here’s an alternative take: maybe Trump or Biden winning is good for stocks. Maybe getting the election out of the way is good for stocks. Maybe stocks rally no matter what happens.
These things are always obvious in hindsight. The 2016 election was incredibly obvious in hindsight. But in the months leading up to it, we did the same game theory simulations. And, at the end of the day, nobody got it right.
Nobody is going to get this right, either. Anyone who says they know with certainty what is going to happen is suffering from overconfidence or is a charlatan. Or both.
Maybe nothing happens! Maybe the stock market is unch after the election.
Ultimately, this comes down to an exercise in risk management. There are stocks that will clearly do well if Biden wins, and there are stocks that will clearly do well if Trump wins. Own a little bit of both. Own some bonds, some gold, and some real estate.
This may seem like a nihilistic approach, but my experience is that the more people are looking at an opportunity, the less of an opportunity it is.
Taxes
The trend in tax policy is toward increasing progressivity, the idea that rich people pay more than poor people.
The tax code has become increasingly progressive since 1988, when there were only two tax brackets:
One bracket at 15%, for incomes up to $29,750, and
Another bracket at 28%, for incomes over $29,750.
In today’s dollars, $29,750 is about $62,000. I would like to go back to those days.
My quibble with our current system of taxation is not the absolute level of rates; it’s the progressivity. It’s not so much that people are paying a lot on the high end—it’s also that people aren’t paying very much on the low end.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
As you travel around Europe, taxes are high, for sure. But on the low end, they are not especially low. Everyone pays. Everyone has skin in the game.
Here, people with lower incomes do not have much of a financial stake in what goes on in the country.
The problem is that, regardless of whether Biden or Trump wins, you can bet the tax code will become even more progressive. This is bad for democracy.
Many years ago, Dennis Gartman observed that fewer and fewer people had any tax liability at all—a number approaching 50%. What would happen, he asked, if the people in the bottom 50% could vote higher taxes on the top 50%?
We are there.
Although that’s not what’s happening—this election is split on income and education, but in reverse. Counterintuitively, people with lower incomes are not voting for higher taxes—it’s the people with higher incomes.
It’s an urban legend that rich people tend to vote Republican—they really don’t, especially not now.
Biden Is Priced In
Whatever you believe about the accuracy of the polls, I firmly believe that stocks are pricing in a Biden victory.
Just look at the Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). It would not be shooting up if Trump were priced in. The fund is frontrunning a lot of spending on climate change initiatives, which Biden has pledged $2 trillion toward.
If Biden is priced in, and Biden wins, the stock market is unlikely to do much. In fact, there may be a “sell the news” event, which is usually what happens after everyone piles into a trade.
If Trump wins, it will take the market by surprise, much like what happened in 2016. And if the election is contested in any way, I doubt it will create much market turmoil, as everyone seems to be hedged for that possibility.
I’ve traded through five elections, and you cannot draw any generalizations from any of them. All you can do is plan for asymmetry in positioning.
It’s like betting on horses—you can bet on the long shot, and it’s fun, but you won’t win very often. Or you can bet on the favorite, which is boring, and you won’t win very much, but you’ll win more often.
Jared Dillian is an investment strategist at Mauldin Economics, a former head of ETF trading at Lehman Brothers, and the author of The Awesome Portfolio. Subscribe to his weekly investment newsletter, The 10th Man, and listen to his daily radio program, “The Jared Dillian Show.” You can follow Jared on Twitter @dailydirtnap.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-22--SELLOUT Justice Roberts betrays again, allows Democrats to count Pennsylvania mail-in ballots 3 days

SELLOUT Justice Roberts betrays again, allows Democrats to count Pennsylvania mail-in ballots 3 days after the election

( Natural News ) The Supreme Court has rejected an effort by Republicans in the state of Pennsylvania to disallow the counting of mail-in ballots that are received after Nov. 3 .
In a striking 4–4 decision , Chief Justice John Roberts sided with his “ liberal ” colleagues by ruling that mail-in ballots received in Pennsylvania after Election Day can still be counted , just so long as they arrive by Nov. 6 .
State Republicans had previously sought in a lower court to stop this from happening because of perceived voter fraud .
When the lower court ruled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the higher court , which currently has a vacant seat following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
Five votes would have been needed among the eight remaining justices in order to overturn this lower court ruling , however Justice Roberts did not see fit to lean that way .
Instead , he decided to leave the lower court ruling intact .
“ The Pennsylvania Supreme Court , which has a 5–2 Democratic majority , ruled on Sept. 17 that election officials can accept all mail-in ballots , including absentee ballots , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 election , granting a request from the state ’ s Democratic Party , ” The Epoch Times reports .
“ In particular , the deadline was moved to 5 p.m. on Nov. 6 from 8 p.m. on Nov. 3 , provided that the ballots are postmarked , or believed to be postmarked by 8 p.m. on election night .
The court also let voters cast their ballots via drop boxes.
” Election Day is right around the corner .
To track what is happening in real time , be sure to visit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that all ballots received on or before 5 p.m. on Nov. 6 that lack a postmark , a legible postmark , or other proof of mailing will still be counted as well , and “ be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day.
” Again , due to concerns about voter fraud , Republicans remain adamantly opposed to any counting of ballots , and especially mail-in ballots , after Nov. 3 .
They argue that federal law sets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first Monday in November , which this year lands on Nov. 3 .
Any such decision to make a change must constitutionally go through lawmakers first , not the courts , they contend .
“ By judicial fiat , that decision removed the principal method by which Pennsylvania structures its post-election process , permitting votes to be cast after Election Day and counted after Election Day , ” Republican lawmakers wrote , lamenting the decision .
“ By doing so , the decision creates multiple election days after November 3 , 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ votes can be cast ( i.e .
voted ) after November 3 , 2020 .
The decision also usurped the Pennsylvania General Assembly ’ s constitutionally-delegated authority to set the times , places , and manner of federal elections in Pennsylvania.
” Had Amy Coney Barrett already been confirmed , many are now speculating , the decision could have gone the other direction , assuming she would have sided with the other “ conservative ” justices .
In the event that Barrett makes it to the court before Election Day , however , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a tweet citing Politico , Josh Gerstein noted that the current ruling “ could be short-lived if Trump ’ s nominee makes it to the court before or around Election Day.
” “ Perfect , ” joked one Epoch Times commenter about the fiasco .
“ Now we can watch as PA struggles to hunt Biden votes 3 days after the election .
Roberts , a day of accounting is coming.
” “ John Roberts has now completed his journey to full on leftist activist judge , ” wrote another .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) on the court now more than ever .
”

by: Ethan Huff
(Natural News) The Supreme Court has rejected an effort by Republicans in the state of Pennsylvania to disallow the counting of mail-in ballots that are received after Nov. 3.
In a striking 4–4 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with his “liberal” colleagues by ruling that mail-in ballots received in Pennsylvania after Election Day can still be counted, just so long as they arrive by Nov. 6.
State Republicans had previously sought in a lower court to stop this from happening because of perceived voter fraud. When the lower court ruled against them, the case was escalated to the higher court, which currently has a vacant seat following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Five votes would have been needed among the eight remaining justices in order to overturn this lower court ruling, however Justice Roberts did not see fit to lean that way. Instead, he decided to leave the lower court ruling intact.
“The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which has a 5–2 Democratic majority, ruled on Sept. 17 that election officials can accept all mail-in ballots, including absentee ballots, up to three days after the Nov. 3 election, granting a request from the state’s Democratic Party,” The Epoch Times reports.
“In particular, the deadline was moved to 5 p.m. on Nov. 6 from 8 p.m. on Nov. 3, provided that the ballots are postmarked, or believed to be postmarked by 8 p.m. on election night. The court also let voters cast their ballots via drop boxes.”
Election Day is right around the corner. To track what is happening in real time, be sure to visit Trump.news.
Republicans say extending election day violates federal law
The lower court further rules that all ballots received on or before 5 p.m. on Nov. 6 that lack a postmark, a legible postmark, or other proof of mailing will still be counted as well, and “be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day unless a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was mailed after Election Day.”
Again, due to concerns about voter fraud, Republicans remain adamantly opposed to any counting of ballots, and especially mail-in ballots, after Nov. 3. They argue that federal law sets Election Day as the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, which this year lands on Nov. 3.
Any such decision to make a change must constitutionally go through lawmakers first, not the courts, they contend.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
“By judicial fiat, that decision removed the principal method by which Pennsylvania structures its post-election process, permitting votes to be cast after Election Day and counted after Election Day,” Republican lawmakers wrote, lamenting the decision.
“By doing so, the decision creates multiple election days after November 3, 2020, in violation of federal law since votes can be cast (i.e. voted) after November 3, 2020. The decision also usurped the Pennsylvania General Assembly’s constitutionally-delegated authority to set the times, places, and manner of federal elections in Pennsylvania.”
Had Amy Coney Barrett already been confirmed, many are now speculating, the decision could have gone the other direction, assuming she would have sided with the other “conservative” justices.
In the event that Barrett makes it to the court before Election Day, however, the decision could still be overruled. In a tweet citing Politico, Josh Gerstein noted that the current ruling “could be short-lived if Trump’s nominee makes it to the court before or around Election Day.”
“Perfect,” joked one Epoch Times commenter about the fiasco. “Now we can watch as PA struggles to hunt Biden votes 3 days after the election. Roberts, a day of accounting is coming.”
“John Roberts has now completed his journey to full on leftist activist judge,” wrote another. “We need ACB (Amy Coney Barrett) on the court now more than ever.”
Sources for this article include:
TheEpochTimes.com
NaturalNews.com
LawAndCrime.com


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-22--Smart money turns negative on the buck

Smart money turns negative on the buck

The last couple of times this happened the dollar had a big rally .
The dollar is generally weak in @ @ @ @ @ strengthens during risk off .
So it makes sense the dollar is weak now .
@ @ @ @ @ net short stocks for the first time in months .
They ’ ve also started @ @ @ @ @ .
The last two times they flirted with longs in the dollar and then flipped @ @ @ @ @ proceeded to rally strongly .
Commercial hedgers have underlying exposure to the contracts they ’ @ @ @ @ @ it always seems like they ’ re fighting the primary trend , they ’ re @ @ @ @ @ just constantly adjusting their exposure and should never truly be net short any market .

The last couple of times this happened the dollar had a big rally. The dollar is generally weak in extreme risk on environments and strengthens during risk off. So it makes sense the dollar is weak now.
The smart money has gone net short stocks for the first time in months. They’ve also started to short the U.S. dollar.
The last two times they flirted with longs in the dollar and then flipped to short, the buck proceeded to rally strongly. Commercial hedgers have underlying exposure to the contracts they’re trading, so while it always seems like they’re fighting the primary trend, they’re not. They’re just constantly adjusting their exposure and should never truly be net short any market.


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--PayPal to allow cryptocurrency buying, selling and shopping on its network

Will enable cryptocurrency as a funding source for digital commerce at its 26 million merchants Receives conditional Bitlicense from New @ @ @ @ @ Services

by mivotvo
Will enable cryptocurrency as a funding source for digital commerce at its 26 million merchants
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Receives conditional Bitlicense from New York State Department of Financial Services
investor.pypl.com/news-and-events/news-details/2020/PayPal-Launches-New-Service-Enabling-Users-to-Buy-Hold-and-Sell-Cryptocurrency/default.aspx


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--G. Orwell’s 1984 most repeated words

G. Orwell’s 1984 most repeated words

– text processing : packages ‘ archive ’ and ‘ hgr ’ for parsing ; ‘ tm ’ and ‘ @ @ @ @

by HitchHux
Source: G. Orwell, 1984. London: Penguin ed. epub format
Manipulation and Viz: R
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
– text processing: packages ‘archive’ and ‘hgr’ for parsing; ‘tm’ and ‘stringi’ for cleaning
– word cloud: ‘wordcloud’ and ‘wordcloud2’ packages


investmentwatchblog--2020-10-21--NYC commercial mortgage backed securities are going to crash

His series looking for a new space for his store is very interesting .

His series looking for a new space for his store is very interesting.
Congratulations to Central Bankers.
We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
h/t GirlyFeminist