thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-08--Ilhan Omar’s Campaign Gave Husband $635,000 In Covid-19 Bailout Money For His ‘Consulting’ Firm, Whi

Ilhan Omar ’ s Campaign Gave Husband $ 635,000 In Covid-19 Bailout Money For His ‘ Consulting ’ Firm , While Small Businesses Starved All while our small business owners starve and go into bankruptcy .
It ’ s a travesty .
Ilhan Omar ’ s husband received $ 635k in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm , despite congresswoman paying his company a staggering $ 2.25M this year alone • Ilhan Omar ’ s husband Tim Mynett received $ 635,000 in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm , according to records • The company received $ 134,800 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 500,000 for in Economic Injury Disaster loans in April , records show • E Street Group was also paid $ 2,256,700 since the start of 2020 from Omar ’ s campaign for digital advertising , fundraising consulting and website production • Omar announced in mid-November that her campaign was terminating its contract with the firm after scrutiny about the payments • She claimed : ‘ Tim – beyond his salary at the firm – received no profit whatsoever from the consulting relationship the firm provided ’ • DailyMail.com revealed that Omar married the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working for Omar during the 2018 election – which she won by a landslide – while they were both still married Ilhan Omar ’ s husband received $ 635,000 in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm , despite the congresswoman paying his company nearly $ 2.25 million this year , according to a new report .
Tim Mynett ’ s E Street Group was given $ 134,800 in Paycheck Protection Program ( PPP ) loans and an additional $ 500,000 in Economic Injury Disaster loans ( EIDL ) in April , records @ @ @ @ @ @ @ firm , which has also been paid $ 2,256,700 since the start of 2020 from Omar ’ s campaign for services that include digital advertising , fundraising consulting and website production , campaign records show .
DailyMail.com revealed that Omar married the political consultant back in March , which sparked scrutiny and a complaint to the Federal Election Commission by a conservative group that alleged campaign funds paid for Mynett ’ s personal travel .
The FEC has taken no public action on that complaint , and Omar , 38 , has said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legitimate .
Still , Omar announced in mid-November that her campaign was terminating its contract to ‘ make sure that anybody who is supporting our campaign with their time or financial support feels there is no perceived issue with that support ’ .
Tim Mynett ’ s E Street Group was given $ 134,800 in Paycheck Protection Program ( PPP ) loans and an additional $ 500,000 in Economic Injury Disaster loans ( EIDL ) in April , records show Omar wrote : ‘ Every dollar that was spent went to a team @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us fight back against attacks and organize on the ground and online in a COVID-19 world .
‘ And Tim – beyond his salary at the firm – received no profit whatsoever from the consulting relationship the firm provided.
’ Omar ’ s campaign was big business for E Street Group , reportedly paying the firm more than $ 1.1 million for advertising and consulting in the third quarter of this year alone .
The raw figures includes regular monthly payments of $ 67,000 , broken down as $ 50,000 for ‘ digital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fundraising consulting ’ and $ 5,000 for ‘ digital consulting.
’ The revelation raised eyebrows among some who accused the congresswoman – who is frequently a target of criticism from Republicans – of potential conflict of interest .
‘ Omar ’ s campaign chest is looking more and more like a dowry , ’ Peter Flaherty , the head of a group which filed a complaint with the FEC over Omar ’ s spending , told DailyMail.com back in April .
‘ Most candidates for federal office keep a close eye on their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t being overcharged , but with her being married to her chief fundraiser the incentive may be the other way round as the money spent is going directly to the family .

Ilhan Omar’s Campaign Gave Husband $635,000 In Covid-19 Bailout Money For His ‘Consulting’ Firm, While Small Businesses Starved
All while our small business owners starve and go into bankruptcy. It’s a travesty.
“Omar’s husband got over a half million dollars in bailout relief for a political consultant firm in an election year but restaurants can’t get the money.” #TheFive pic.twitter.com/seFtaQe8Em — Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) December 7, 2020
Ilhan Omar’s husband received $635k in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm, despite congresswoman paying his company a staggering $2.25M this year alone
Ilhan Omar’s husband Tim Mynett received $635,000 in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm, according to records
Mynett co-owns the Washington D.C. firm E Street Group
The company received $134,800 in Paycheck Protection Program loans and $500,000 for in Economic Injury Disaster loans in April, records show
E Street Group was also paid $2,256,700 since the start of 2020 from Omar’s campaign for digital advertising, fundraising consulting and website production
Omar announced in mid-November that her campaign was terminating its contract with the firm after scrutiny about the payments
She claimed: ‘Tim – beyond his salary at the firm – received no profit whatsoever from the consulting relationship the firm provided’
DailyMail.com revealed that Omar married the political consultant in March
Mynett began working for Omar during the 2018 election – which she won by a landslide – while they were both still married
By Mail Online, December 8, 2020
Ilhan Omar’s husband received $635,000 in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm, despite the congresswoman paying his company nearly $2.25 million this year, according to a new report.
Tim Mynett’s E Street Group was given $134,800 in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and an additional $500,000 in Economic Injury Disaster loans (EIDL) in April, records show.
Mynett co-owns the Washington D.C. firm, which has also been paid $2,256,700 since the start of 2020 from Omar’s campaign for services that include digital advertising, fundraising consulting and website production, campaign records show.
DailyMail.com revealed that Omar married the political consultant back in March, which sparked scrutiny and a complaint to the Federal Election Commission by a conservative group that alleged campaign funds paid for Mynett’s personal travel.
The FEC has taken no public action on that complaint, and Omar, 38, has said payments to Mynett’s firm were legitimate.
Still, Omar announced in mid-November that her campaign was terminating its contract to ‘make sure that anybody who is supporting our campaign with their time or financial support feels there is no perceived issue with that support’.
Tim Mynett’s E Street Group was given $134,800 in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and an additional $500,000 in Economic Injury Disaster loans (EIDL) in April, records show
Mynett co-owns the Washington D.C. firm, which has also been paid $2,256,700 since the start of 2020 from Omar’s campaign for services including digital advertising, fundraising consulting and website production, campaign records show
Omar wrote: ‘Every dollar that was spent went to a team of more than twenty that were helping us fight back against attacks and organize on the ground and online in a COVID-19 world.
‘And Tim – beyond his salary at the firm – received no profit whatsoever from the consulting relationship the firm provided.’
Omar’s campaign was big business for E Street Group, reportedly paying the firm more than $1.1 million for advertising and consulting in the third quarter of this year alone.
The raw figures includes regular monthly payments of $67,000, broken down as $50,000 for ‘digital advertising,’ $12,000 for ‘fundraising consulting’ and $5,000 for ‘digital consulting.’
The revelation raised eyebrows among some who accused the congresswoman – who is frequently a target of criticism from Republicans – of potential conflict of interest.
‘Omar’s campaign chest is looking more and more like a dowry,’ Peter Flaherty, the head of a group which filed a complaint with the FEC over Omar’s spending, told DailyMail.com back in April.
‘Most candidates for federal office keep a close eye on their vendors to make sure they aren’t being overcharged, but with her being married to her chief fundraiser the incentive may be the other way round as the money spent is going directly to the family.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-08--Controversial COVID-19 Data Scientist’s Home Raided – Guns Pointed At Family & Computers Seized (Vid

Controversial COVID-19 Data Scientist’s Home Raided – Guns Pointed At Family & Computers Seized (Video)

Tallahassee , FL — Earlier this year in May , Rebekah Jones , the data scientist working for Florida , who put together that state ’ s COVID-19 database , made national headlines when she was fired by the state over a disagreement in reporting the numbers .
Jones says she was fired for refusing to manipulate data that showed a higher number of deaths while the state claimed she was fired for insubordination .
Fast-forward to this month , and what started as a firing ended with armed agents of the state allegedly pointing guns at an entire family @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home .
After she was fired in May , Jones made the following claim : I was asked by DOH leadership to manually change numbers .
This was a week before the reopening plan officially kicked off into phase one .
I was asked to do the analysis and present the findings about which counties met the criteria for reopening .
The criteria followed more or less the White House panel ’ s recommendations , but our epidemiology team also contributed to that as well .
As soon as I presented the results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what they had anticipated .
The whole day while we ’ re having this kind of back and forth changing this , not showing that , the plan was being printed and stapled right in front of me .
So it was very clear at that point that the science behind the supposedly science-driven plan didn ’ t matter because the plan was already made .
After she was fired , Jones continued her work reporting the numbers by starting the website Florida COVID Action , which is a dashboard of Florida COVID @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to run for the state .
Since then , she ’ s been running this site without much resistance from the state — until now .
On Monday , multiple armed officers entered her home , pulled her out , before she says they began pointing guns at her children and husband .
Jones claims that she was raided for simply reporting the data and “ speaking truth to power ” but the state says someone hacked their emergency alert system and it was traced back to Jones ’ IP address .

Tallahassee, FL — Earlier this year in May, Rebekah Jones, the data scientist working for Florida, who put together that state’s COVID-19 database, made national headlines when she was fired by the state over a disagreement in reporting the numbers. Jones says she was fired for refusing to manipulate data that showed a higher number of deaths while the state claimed she was fired for insubordination. Fast-forward to this month, and what started as a firing ended with armed agents of the state allegedly pointing guns at an entire family, during a raid on their Florida home.
After she was fired in May, Jones made the following claim:
I was asked by DOH leadership to manually change numbers. This was a week before the reopening plan officially kicked off into phase one. I was asked to do the analysis and present the findings about which counties met the criteria for reopening. The criteria followed more or less the White House panel’s recommendations, but our epidemiology team also contributed to that as well. As soon as I presented the results, they were essentially the opposite of what they had anticipated. The whole day while we’re having this kind of back and forth changing this, not showing that, the plan was being printed and stapled right in front of me. So it was very clear at that point that the science behind the supposedly science-driven plan didn’t matter because the plan was already made.
After she was fired, Jones continued her work reporting the numbers by starting the website Florida COVID Action, which is a dashboard of Florida COVID information, like the one she used to run for the state. Since then, she’s been running this site without much resistance from the state — until now.
On Monday, multiple armed officers entered her home, pulled her out, before she says they began pointing guns at her children and husband.
At 8:30 am this morning, state police came into my house and took all my hardware and tech. They were serving a warrant on my computer after DOH filed a complaint. They pointed a gun in my face. They pointed guns at my kids..
1/
There will be no update today. At 8:30 am this morning, state police came into my house and took all my hardware and tech. They were serving a warrant on my computer after DOH filed a complaint. They pointed a gun in my face. They pointed guns at my kids.. pic.twitter.com/DE2QfOmtPU — Rebekah Jones (@GeoRebekah) December 7, 2020
Jones claims that she was raided for simply reporting the data and “speaking truth to power” but the state says someone hacked their emergency alert system and it was traced back to Jones’ IP address.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-08--Invasion of the Body Snatchers: Psychological Warfare Disguised as a Pandemic Threat

It ’ s like Invasion of the Body Snatchers all over again .
The nation is being overtaken by an alien threat that invades bodies , alters minds , and transforms freedom-loving people into a mindless , compliant , conforming mob intolerant of anyone who dares to be different , let alone think for themselves .
However , while Body Snatchers—the chilling 1956 film directed by Don Siegel—blames its woes on seed pods from outerspace , the seismic societal shift taking place in America owes less to biological warfare reliant on the COVID-19 virus than it does to psychological warfare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is how you persuade a populace to voluntarily march in lockstep with a police state and police themselves ( and each other ) : by ratcheting up the fear-factor , meted out one carefully calibrated crisis at a time , and teaching them to distrust any who diverge from the norm .
This is not a new experiment in mind control .
The powers-that-be have been pushing our buttons and herding us along like so much cattle since World War II , at least , starting with the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into World War II but also unified the American people in their opposition to a common enemy .
That fear of attack by foreign threats , conveniently torqued by the growing military industrial complex , in turn gave rise to the Cold War era ’ s “ Red Scare.
” Promulgated through government propaganda , paranoia and manipulation , anti-Communist sentiments boiled over into a mass hysteria that viewed anyone and everyone as suspect : your friends , the next-door neighbor , even your family members could be a Communist subversive .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the House Un-American Activities Committee , where hundreds of Americans were called before Congress to testify about their so-called Communist affiliations and intimidated into making false confessions , also paved the way for the rise of an all-knowing , all-seeing governmental surveillance state .
The 9/11 attacks followed a similar script : a foreign invasion mounts an attack on an unsuspecting nation , the people unite in solidarity against a common foe , and the government gains greater war-time powers ( read : surveillance powers ) that , conveniently enough , become permanent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government ’ s scripted response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been predictably consistent : once again , in order to fight this so-called “ foreign ” foe , the government insists it needs even greater surveillance powers .
As we ’ ve seen since 9/11 and more recently with the COVID lockdowns , those in power have always had a penchant for enacting extreme measures to combat perceived threats .
However , unlike the modern America police state , the American government circa the 1950s did not have at its disposal the arsenal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intrinsic part of our modern surveillance state .
Today , we are watched and tracked 24/7 ; data is collected on us at an alarming rate by governmental and corporate entities ; and with the help of powerful computer programs , American domestic intelligence agencies sweep our websites , listen in on our telephone calls and read our text messages at will .
Now with the COVID pandemic and its offshoots such as contact tracing and immunity passports , the governmental landscape is even more invasive .
Yet no matter the threat , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can we hold onto our basic freedoms and avoid succumbing to the soul-sucking dredge of conformity that threatens our very humanity ?
This conundrum is at the heart of the 1956 classic Invasion of the Body Snatchers , which was based on a 1954 science fiction novel by Jack Finney ( and later remade into an equally chilling 1978 film by Philip Kaufman ) .
Body Snatchers not only captured the ideology and politics of its post-war era but remains timely and relevant as it relates to the worries that plague us today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rehearsal and 23 days of actual shooting , Body Snatchers is considered one of the great science fiction classics .
v is set in a small California town which has been infiltrated by mysterious pods from outer space that replicate and take the place of humans who then become conforming non-individuals .
Miles Bennell , the main character , is a local doctor who resists the invaders and their attempts to erase humanity from the face of the earth .
At the very least , the film conveys a double meaning , serving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moment in history and a compass pointing to a growing societal illness .
Following World War II with the emerging military empire , the atomic bomb and the Korean War , Americans were confused and neurotically preoccupied with domestic threats , the polio pandemic and international political events , not much different from today ’ s populace preoccupied with domestic and international political drama , terrorism and the COVID-19 pandemic .
Yet Siegel ’ s film delves beneath the surface to confront an even more sinister threat : the dehumanization of individuals and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infused as part of the societal machine .
Central to the film is one key speech delivered by Bennell while hiding from the aliens : As Siegel makes clear , it is not Communists or terrorists or even viral pandemics that threaten our well-being .
The real enemy is invasive governmental measures—something we now see happening across the country—and , thus , totalitarian conformity .
And resistance must be against all government measures that threaten our civil liberties and against all kinds of conformity , no matter the shape , size or color @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When all is said and done , however , the real threat to freedom ( in the fictional world of Body Snatchers and in our present-day America ) is posed by an establishment—be it governmental , corporate or societal—that is hostile to individuality and those who dare to challenge the status quo .
The mob hysteria , sense of paranoia , fascist police and the witch hunt atmosphere of the film mirror the ills of a 1950s America that is frighteningly applicable to present American society .
Acknowledging that Body Snatchers portrayed the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mindless authority , Siegel stated , “ I think the world is populated by pods and I wanted to show them.
” He explained : People are pods .
Many of my associates are certainly pods .
They have no feelings .
They exist , breathe , sleep .
To be a pod means that you have no passion , no anger , the spark has left you…of course , there ’ s a very strong case for being a pod .
These pods , who get rid of pain , ill-health and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , doing good .
It happens to leave you in a very dull world but that , by the way , is the world that most of us live in .
It ’ s the same as people who welcome going into the army or prison .
There ’ s regimentation , a lack of having to make up your mind , face decisions… .
People are becoming vegetables .
I don ’ t know what the answer is except an awareness of it .
All of the threats to freedom documented in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the American People came about because “ we the people ” stopped thinking for ourselves and relinquished control over our lives and our country to government operatives who care only for money and power .
While the specific game plan for turning things around is complicated by a police state that wants to keep us at a disadvantage , the solution is relatively simple : Don ’ t be a pod person .
Pay attention .
Question everything .
Dare to be different .
Don ’ t follow the mob .
Don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world around you .
Be compassionate .
Be humane .
Most of all , think for yourself .

“Look! You fools! You’re in danger! Can’t you see? They’re after you! They’re after all of us! Our wives…our children…they’re here already! You’re next!”—Dr. Miles Bennell, Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)
It’s like Invasion of the Body Snatchers all over again.
The nation is being overtaken by an alien threat that invades bodies, alters minds, and transforms freedom-loving people into a mindless, compliant, conforming mob intolerant of anyone who dares to be different, let alone think for themselves.
However, while Body Snatchers—the chilling 1956 film directed by Don Siegel—blames its woes on seed pods from outerspace, the seismic societal shift taking place in America owes less to biological warfare reliant on the COVID-19 virus than it does to psychological warfare disguised as a pandemic threat.
As science writer David Robson explains:
Fears of contagion lead us to become more conformist and tribalistic, and less accepting of eccentricity. Our moral judgements become harsher and our social attitudes more conservative when considering issues such as immigration or sexual freedom and equality. Daily reminders of disease may even sway our political affiliations… Various experiments have shown that we become more conformist and respectful of convention when we feel the threat of a disease… the evocative images of a pandemic led [participants in an experiment] to value conformity and obedience over eccentricity or rebellion.
This is how you persuade a populace to voluntarily march in lockstep with a police state and police themselves (and each other): by ratcheting up the fear-factor, meted out one carefully calibrated crisis at a time, and teaching them to distrust any who diverge from the norm.
This is not a new experiment in mind control.
The powers-that-be have been pushing our buttons and herding us along like so much cattle since World War II, at least, starting with the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor, which not only propelled the U.S. into World War II but also unified the American people in their opposition to a common enemy.
That fear of attack by foreign threats, conveniently torqued by the growing military industrial complex, in turn gave rise to the Cold War era’s “Red Scare.” Promulgated through government propaganda, paranoia and manipulation, anti-Communist sentiments boiled over into a mass hysteria that viewed anyone and everyone as suspect: your friends, the next-door neighbor, even your family members could be a Communist subversive.
This hysteria, which culminated in hearings before the House Un-American Activities Committee, where hundreds of Americans were called before Congress to testify about their so-called Communist affiliations and intimidated into making false confessions, also paved the way for the rise of an all-knowing, all-seeing governmental surveillance state.
The 9/11 attacks followed a similar script: a foreign invasion mounts an attack on an unsuspecting nation, the people unite in solidarity against a common foe, and the government gains greater war-time powers (read: surveillance powers) that, conveniently enough, become permanent once the threat has passed.
The government’s scripted response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been predictably consistent: once again, in order to fight this so-called “foreign” foe, the government insists it needs even greater surveillance powers.
As we’ve seen since 9/11 and more recently with the COVID lockdowns, those in power have always had a penchant for enacting extreme measures to combat perceived threats. However, unlike the modern America police state, the American government circa the 1950s did not have at its disposal the arsenal of invasive technologies that are such an intrinsic part of our modern surveillance state.
Today, we are watched and tracked 24/7; data is collected on us at an alarming rate by governmental and corporate entities; and with the help of powerful computer programs, American domestic intelligence agencies sweep our websites, listen in on our telephone calls and read our text messages at will.
Now with the COVID pandemic and its offshoots such as contact tracing and immunity passports, the governmental landscape is even more invasive.
Yet no matter the threat, the underlying principle remains the same: can we hold onto our basic freedoms and avoid succumbing to the soul-sucking dredge of conformity that threatens our very humanity?
This conundrum is at the heart of the 1956 classic Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which was based on a 1954 science fiction novel by Jack Finney (and later remade into an equally chilling 1978 film by Philip Kaufman).
Body Snatchers not only captured the ideology and politics of its post-war era but remains timely and relevant as it relates to the worries that plague us today. Filmed with only seven days of rehearsal and 23 days of actual shooting, Body Snatchers is considered one of the great science fiction classics.
v is set in a small California town which has been infiltrated by mysterious pods from outer space that replicate and take the place of humans who then become conforming non-individuals. Miles Bennell, the main character, is a local doctor who resists the invaders and their attempts to erase humanity from the face of the earth.
At the very least, the film conveys a double meaning, serving as both a mirror of a particular moment in history and a compass pointing to a growing societal illness. Following World War II with the emerging military empire, the atomic bomb and the Korean War, Americans were confused and neurotically preoccupied with domestic threats, the polio pandemic and international political events, not much different from today’s populace preoccupied with domestic and international political drama, terrorism and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Yet Siegel’s film delves beneath the surface to confront an even more sinister threat: the dehumanization of individuals and the horrifying possibility that humanity could become infused as part of the societal machine.
Central to the film is one key speech delivered by Bennell while hiding from the aliens:
In my practice, I see how people have allowed their humanity to drain away…only it happens slowly instead of all at once. They didn’t seem to mind…. All of us, a little bit. We harden our hearts…grow callous…only when we have to fight to stay human do we realize how precious it is.
As Siegel makes clear, it is not Communists or terrorists or even viral pandemics that threaten our well-being. The real enemy is invasive governmental measures—something we now see happening across the country—and, thus, totalitarian conformity. And resistance must be against all government measures that threaten our civil liberties and against all kinds of conformity, no matter the shape, size or color of the package it comes in.
When all is said and done, however, the real threat to freedom (in the fictional world of Body Snatchers and in our present-day America) is posed by an establishment—be it governmental, corporate or societal—that is hostile to individuality and those who dare to challenge the status quo.
The mob hysteria, sense of paranoia, fascist police and the witch hunt atmosphere of the film mirror the ills of a 1950s America that is frighteningly applicable to present American society.
Acknowledging that Body Snatchers portrayed the conflict between individuals and varied forms of mindless authority, Siegel stated, “I think the world is populated by pods and I wanted to show them.” He explained:
People are pods. Many of my associates are certainly pods. They have no feelings. They exist, breathe, sleep. To be a pod means that you have no passion, no anger, the spark has left you…of course, there’s a very strong case for being a pod. These pods, who get rid of pain, ill-health and mental disturbances are, in a sense, doing good. It happens to leave you in a very dull world but that, by the way, is the world that most of us live in. It’s the same as people who welcome going into the army or prison. There’s regimentation, a lack of having to make up your mind, face decisions…. People are becoming vegetables. I don’t know what the answer is except an awareness of it.
All of the threats to freedom documented in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People came about because “we the people” stopped thinking for ourselves and relinquished control over our lives and our country to government operatives who care only for money and power.
While the specific game plan for turning things around is complicated by a police state that wants to keep us at a disadvantage, the solution is relatively simple: Don’t be a pod person. Pay attention. Question everything. Dare to be different. Don’t follow the mob. Don’t let yourself become numb to the world around you. Be compassionate. Be humane. Most of all, think for yourself.
Article posted with permission from John Whitehead


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-09--Texas Lawsuit Is On The Docket – Supreme Court Will Determine Fate Of 2020 Election

Very few of the lawsuits that Trump ’ s legal team has filed since Election Day have really worried the left , but when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit directly with the Supreme Court on Monday night they immediately began freaking out .
The reason why they are so alarmed is because they understand that this suit has the potential to flip the election .
The suit alleges that the states of Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin conducted their elections in ways that violated the U.S. Constitution , and if the Supreme Court agrees @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court would force the state legislatures of those states “ to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment ” .
At this hour , we are being told that Louisiana , Arkansas , Alabama , Florida , Kentucky , Mississippi , South Carolina and South Dakota have all joined the suit that Paxton has filed .
The U.S. Constitution gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over controversies between states , and so this is why this case did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lower court first .
But the Supreme Court is not obligated to hear any particular case , and many on the left initially thought that the Court would never actually agree to hear it .
Well , it was put on the docket just 12 hours after it was filed , and so it will be heard .
And on Tuesday evening , the Supreme Court ordered the defending states to file their answers by Thursday at 3 PM eastern time .
So this is really happening .
The Supreme Court will determine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all .
In his complaint , Paxton argued that voters in his state were affected by the unconstitutional voting procedures in the other states because in “ the shared enterprise of the entire nation electing the president and vice president , equal protection violations in one state can and do adversely affect and diminish the weight of votes cast in states that lawfully abide by the election structure set forth in the Constitution.
” And he is absolutely correct .
When one or more states violates the U.S. Constitution during a presidential election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because voters in every state are involved in electing the president .
According to the Electors Clause , state legislatures have the authority to establish how presidential electors will be chosen in their particular states , but Paxton alleges that government officials in Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin made up their own rules and did not follow the election laws that had been passed by their own state legislatures… “ Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification , government officials in the defendant states of Georgia , Michigan , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , usurped their legislatures ’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state ’ s election statutes , ” Paxton wrote in his filing .
“ To safeguard public legitimacy at this unprecedented moment and restore public trust in the presidential election , this Court should extend the December 14 , 2020 deadline for Defendant States ’ certification of presidential electors to allow these investigations to be completed , ” he wrote .
“ Should one of the two leading candidates receive an absolute majority of the presidential electors ’ votes to be cast on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ selection of our President .
The only date that is mandated under the Constitution , however , is January 20 , 2021.
” Unlike the allegations of election fraud that are floating around out there , these allegations are very easy to prove .
The following is a brief summary of some of the issues in each of the four states that comes from the Heritage Foundation… • Pennsylvania : The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of , among other things , “ without legislative approval , unilaterally abrogating ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for absentee or mail-in ballots.
” These changes were “ not ratified ” by the Pennsylvania legislature .
• Georgia : Similarly , the complaint describes how Georgia ’ s Secretary of State , Brad Raffensperger , also “ without legislative approval , unilaterally abrogated Georgia ’ s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.
” • Michigan : The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “ abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.
” • Wisconsin : Lastly , Wisconsin ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laws without the permission of the legislature that “ weakened , or did away with , established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.
” For these constitutional violations alone , the election results in all four states should be thrown out .
In addition , in his complaint , Paxton alleges that voters in various parts of these states were treated very differently… Once again , this should be a slam dunk to prove based on the evidence that has already been publicly presented .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment .
On top of that , in Bush v. Gore the Supreme Court clearly prohibited “ the use of differential standards in the treatment and tabulation of ballots within a state.
” .
Since differential standards in the treatment of ballots occurred in all four states , that should mean that the election results in all four states should be thrown out .
Lastly , Paxton alleges that there were “ voting irregularities ” in each of the four states , and those allegations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prove .
But Paxton doesn ’ t need to prove them , because the violations of the Electors Clause and the violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment should both be slam dunks .
Assuming that is the case , what is the appropriate remedy ?
Paxton is asking that the state legislatures of Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin be forced “ to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment , or to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In each of those states , those legislatures could opt to hold new elections or alternatively they could decide to choose new slates of electors themselves .
And since all four of those state legislatures are controlled by Republicans , that would seem to favor President Trump .
Needless to say , if the current election results in Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin are overturned , the left will have a massive temper tantrum .
Cities all over the nation would burn and we would see endless civil unrest for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make some members of the Court hesitant to overturn the current election results no matter what the Constitution actually says .
But if there are at least five justices that are willing to follow the Constitution no matter what the consequences are , we may soon see the most shocking decision in the entire history of the U.S. Supreme Court .

Very few of the lawsuits that Trump’s legal team has filed since Election Day have really worried the left, but when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit directly with the Supreme Court on Monday night they immediately began freaking out. The reason why they are so alarmed is because they understand that this suit has the potential to flip the election. The suit alleges that the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin conducted their elections in ways that violated the U.S. Constitution, and if the Supreme Court agrees that would almost certainly mean that the Supreme Court would force the state legislatures of those states “to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment”.
At this hour, we are being told that Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina and South Dakota have all joined the suit that Paxton has filed. The U.S. Constitution gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over controversies between states, and so this is why this case did not need to be filed in a lower court first. But the Supreme Court is not obligated to hear any particular case, and many on the left initially thought that the Court would never actually agree to hear it.
Well, it was put on the docket just 12 hours after it was filed, and so it will be heard.
And on Tuesday evening, the Supreme Court ordered the defending states to file their answers by Thursday at 3 PM eastern time.
So this is really happening.
The Supreme Court will determine the fate of the 2020 election after all.
In his complaint, Paxton argued that voters in his state were affected by the unconstitutional voting procedures in the other states because in “the shared enterprise of the entire nation electing the president and vice president, equal protection violations in one state can and do adversely affect and diminish the weight of votes cast in states that lawfully abide by the election structure set forth in the Constitution.”
And he is absolutely correct. When one or more states violates the U.S. Constitution during a presidential election, that harms everyone that voted, because voters in every state are involved in electing the president.
According to the Electors Clause, state legislatures have the authority to establish how presidential electors will be chosen in their particular states, but Paxton alleges that government officials in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin made up their own rules and did not follow the election laws that had been passed by their own state legislatures…
“Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, government officials in the defendant states of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, usurped their legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election statutes,” Paxton wrote in his filing. “To safeguard public legitimacy at this unprecedented moment and restore public trust in the presidential election, this Court should extend the December 14, 2020 deadline for Defendant States’ certification of presidential electors to allow these investigations to be completed,” he wrote. “Should one of the two leading candidates receive an absolute majority of the presidential electors’ votes to be cast on December 14, this would finalize the selection of our President. The only date that is mandated under the Constitution, however, is January 20, 2021.”
Unlike the allegations of election fraud that are floating around out there, these allegations are very easy to prove.
The following is a brief summary of some of the issues in each of the four states that comes from the Heritage Foundation…
Pennsylvania: The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature.
The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature. Georgia: Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.”
Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.” Michigan: The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.”
The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.” Wisconsin: Lastly, Wisconsin’s elections commission made similar changes in state laws without the permission of the legislature that “weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.”
For these constitutional violations alone, the election results in all four states should be thrown out.
In addition, in his complaint, Paxton alleges that voters in various parts of these states were treated very differently…
Second, the complaint describes how voters in different parts of these states were treated differently. For example, election officials in Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties in Pennsylvania set up a “cure process” for voters in those jurisdictions whose absentee ballots did not comply with state legal requirements. Those noncompliant ballots should have been rejected because state law does not allow such a procedure. As a result of this behavior and similar behavior in other states, there was “more favorable treatment allotted to votes” in areas “administered by local government under Democrat control.”
Once again, this should be a slam dunk to prove based on the evidence that has already been publicly presented.
And without a doubt, differential treatment violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
On top of that, in Bush v. Gore the Supreme Court clearly prohibited “the use of differential standards in the treatment and tabulation of ballots within a state.”.
Since differential standards in the treatment of ballots occurred in all four states, that should mean that the election results in all four states should be thrown out.
Lastly, Paxton alleges that there were “voting irregularities” in each of the four states, and those allegations are going to be more difficult to prove.
But Paxton doesn’t need to prove them, because the violations of the Electors Clause and the violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment should both be slam dunks.
Assuming that is the case, what is the appropriate remedy?
Paxton is asking that the state legislatures of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin be forced “to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment, or to appoint no presidential electors at all.”
In each of those states, those legislatures could opt to hold new elections or alternatively they could decide to choose new slates of electors themselves.
And since all four of those state legislatures are controlled by Republicans, that would seem to favor President Trump.
Needless to say, if the current election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are overturned, the left will have a massive temper tantrum. Cities all over the nation would burn and we would see endless civil unrest for the foreseeable future.
So that may make some members of the Court hesitant to overturn the current election results no matter what the Constitution actually says.
But if there are at least five justices that are willing to follow the Constitution no matter what the consequences are, we may soon see the most shocking decision in the entire history of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-09--Mainstream Media’s Propaganda Campaign Continues:  They Want You Vaxxed!

The mainstream media is ramping up their propaganda campaign in a push to get as many people as possible vaccinated .
The rulers and elitists have already admitted that a big wrench in the cogs of their plans for total enslavement of the public is convincing people to roll up their sleeves and take this shot .
Army General In Charge Of COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution Fears The Public Won ’ t Take It A new poll is now showing that more than half of the New York fire department will refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine as USA Today publishes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decide what ’ s put in your body “ morally indefensible.
” If you don ’ t have complete sovereignty over your own body , you are a slave .
Wake up , people .
It ’ s not about health .
It ’ s about control and always has been : But it isn ’ t just firefighters who don ’ t want this thing .
A separate survey found that only 34 % of nurses will be willing to take the COVID-19 vaccine and 31 % are still undecided .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when asked if they would voluntarily be vaccinated against COVID-19 , only 34 % said yes while 36 % said no .
The remaining 31 % weren ’ t sure what they would do .
“ Most groups that have been working on this , starting with the National Academy of Medicine , are recommending that the first tier of vaccinations should be very frontline healthcare workers , people that actually take care of patients with COVID-19 , ” said UTHealth and Memorial Hermann infectious disease specialist Dr. Luis Ostrosky .
Many Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ something corrupt , even sinister about this vaccine , and are going to refuse it .
The sad reality is that we all will likely know someone who takes it to either save their job or be allowed in stores .
Businesses will follow the commands of the government and without a federal mandate , will refuse to employ those who don ’ t get vaccinated .
The mainstream media is already making sure you know this .
It ’ s up to us to stick together .
Remember , the ruling class @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elitists ) only have power is we give it to them .
They need us .
We don ’ t need them .
Keep that in mind as this vaccine rolls out .
Medical Journal : Get The COVID-19 Vaccine , Or Be Punished HARSHLY Stay alert , stay awake , stay aware , and stay prepared .
This is coming soon .
We know this vaccine fight is going to get ugly !
We are up against heavily armed government agents who “ just follow orders ” , the elitists , Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s 24/7 fear-mongering propaganda campaigns for all of the above .
Stay strong .

The mainstream media is ramping up their propaganda campaign in a push to get as many people as possible vaccinated. The rulers and elitists have already admitted that a big wrench in the cogs of their plans for total enslavement of the public is convincing people to roll up their sleeves and take this shot.
FDA Commissioner Shares Bill Gates’ Concern: People Might Reject The Coronavirus Vaccine
Army General In Charge Of COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution Fears The Public Won’t Take It
A new poll is now showing that more than half of the New York fire department will refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine as USA Today publishes propaganda hit piece calling your right to decide what’s put in your body “morally indefensible.” If you don’t have complete sovereignty over your own body, you are a slave. Wake up, people. It’s not about health. It’s about control and always has been:
But it isn’t just firefighters who don’t want this thing. A separate survey found that only 34% of nurses will be willing to take the COVID-19 vaccine and 31% are still undecided. The survey of almost 13,000 nurses found that when asked if they would voluntarily be vaccinated against COVID-19, only 34% said yes while 36% said no. The remaining 31% weren’t sure what they would do.
“Most groups that have been working on this, starting with the National Academy of Medicine, are recommending that the first tier of vaccinations should be very frontline healthcare workers, people that actually take care of patients with COVID-19,” said UTHealth and Memorial Hermann infectious disease specialist Dr. Luis Ostrosky.
Many Americans are getting the feeling that there is something corrupt, even sinister about this vaccine, and are going to refuse it. The sad reality is that we all will likely know someone who takes it to either save their job or be allowed in stores.
Businesses will follow the commands of the government and without a federal mandate, will refuse to employ those who don’t get vaccinated. The mainstream media is already making sure you know this. It’s up to us to stick together. Remember, the ruling class (government) and their overlords (elitists) only have power is we give it to them. They need us. We don’t need them. Keep that in mind as this vaccine rolls out.
Medical Journal: Get The COVID-19 Vaccine, Or Be Punished HARSHLY
Stay alert, stay awake, stay aware, and stay prepared. This is coming soon. We know this vaccine fight is going to get ugly!
We are up against heavily armed government agents who “just follow orders”, the elitists, Big Pharma, and the mainstream media’s 24/7 fear-mongering propaganda campaigns for all of the above. Stay strong.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-09--Bombshell Cambridge Documents:  Of All Positive COVID Tests Of 9,000+ Students, 100% Were FALSE POSI

Bombshell Cambridge Documents:  Of All Positive COVID Tests Of 9,000+ Students, 100% Were FALSE POSITIVES

People of the world , you are being deceived !
It ’ s not like we and others haven ’ t tried to warn , but the powers that be seem to want to silence the truth and give voice to the lies .
Well , the documents don ’ t lie .
Cambridge University performed CONvid-1984 screening at the end of November through the first week in December 2020 .
Guess what they discovered ?
Of the more than 9,000 students they tested with the PCR test that tested positive , all of them were found to be false @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which can be viewed below , and on the site here , only 10 people tested positive , but all ten were deemed false positive .
The results speak for themselves .
Remember , Dr. Kary Mullis , the creator of the PCR test said the following .
“ Anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test , if you run it long enough… with PCR if you do it well , you can find almost anything in anybody… it doesn ’ t tell you that you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next time the propagandizing , CIA-controlled , corporate-owned , useful idiots in the media and the bought-off puppets in government continue to tell you the CONvid tests are going up .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

People of the world, you are being deceived! It’s not like we and others haven’t tried to warn, but the powers that be seem to want to silence the truth and give voice to the lies. Well, the documents don’t lie. Cambridge University performed CONvid-1984 screening at the end of November through the first week in December 2020. Guess what they discovered? Of the more than 9,000 students they tested with the PCR test that tested positive, all of them were found to be false positives.
According to the Cambridge report, which can be viewed below, and on the site here, only 10 people tested positive, but all ten were deemed false positive.
Cambridge Pooled Testing Report 30nov-6dec by Tim Brown on Scribd

The results speak for themselves.
Remember, Dr. Kary Mullis, the creator of the PCR test said the following.
“Anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test, if you run it long enough… with PCR if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody… it doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.”
Keep this in your mind the next time the propagandizing, CIA-controlled, corporate-owned, useful idiots in the media and the bought-off puppets in government continue to tell you the CONvid tests are going up.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-09--Michigan:  Representative Tells Soldiers To Make “Trumpers” “Pay” – Gets Stripped Of House Committee

Michigan:  Representative Tells Soldiers To Make “Trumpers” “Pay” – Gets Stripped Of House Committee Assignments – Where’s Justice For Clear Threats She Made?

Michigan : Representative Tells Soldiers To Make “ Trumpers ” “ Pay ” – Gets Stripped Of House Committee Assignments – Where ’ s Justice For Clear Threats She Made ?
Clearly , the Michigan militia is going to have to step it up a bit .
First , it was the tyrant in the governor ’ s mansion abusing her authority over the people she is supposed to serve .
Then , it was those in her administration .
When militia attempted to arrest her and bring her to trial , they were arrested and demonized despite the Constitutional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Clause 15 for them to do so .
Now , Michigan Rep. Cynthia A Johnson , a Democrat from Detroit has been removed from all her House Committee assignments following what was a clearly criminal threat against “ Trumpers.
” What fresh hell is this ?
That ’ s what you may be asking yourself after watching Democrat Cynthia Johnson ’ s new three-minute video .
You may recall Johnson made headlines for being combative after the Michigan hearing .
She also attacked IT specialist Hima Kolanagireddy as a “ liar , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testimony about the Dominion tabulators and backed up the testimony of Melissa Carone , another IT specialist that was contracted by Dominion to work at the TCF Arena in Detriot .
“ You ’ re allowing people to come in here and lie , and I know they ’ re lying !
” Johnson claimed during the Michigan hearing on December 3 .
Fast forward to December 8 , and Johnson has a meltdown on Facebook .
“ Always provide proof .
Nobody cares what your mouth is saying , ” Johnson said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asses in the pocketbook.
” Johnson then made a claim that someone in Illinois threatened her via voice mail .
That ’ s when she goes on to attack “ Trumpers.
” “ So , this is just a warning to you Trumpers , ” Johnson declared .
“ Be careful .
Walk lightly .
We ain ’ t playing with you .
Enough of the shenanigans .
Enough is enough .
And for those of you who are soldiers—you know how to do it .
Do it right .
Be in order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , people called into police , which probably won ’ t result in anything seeing that Whitmer is still in office .
Hint , hint… “ Called Michigan State Police at 517-322-1907 and they said they ’ re aware of this and have had numerous calls and are actively investigating this threat from @ RepCAJohnson .
This is outrageous , ” tweeted Sidney ’ s Doppelganger .
“ This is a threat to silence the opposing party by violent means .
She is on public record calling for violence across state lines .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ and instructs them ‘ Make them pay.
’ FBI should investigate , ” tweeted Mario Cordon .
The same FBI that was in on spying on the Trump campaign , that failed to deal with the man who wanted to behead Pamela Geller , the same FBI who couldn ’ t tackle 9/11 properly , and gave a green light to jihadis in Garland Texas , along with failing to bring Hillary Clinton to justice ?
That FBI ?
Surely you jest !
“ Isn ’ t she the one in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spelling and maiden name of a terrified witness ?
As though she were gon na DOX ?
” tweeted “ Thinkologist.
” She also took to Facebook claiming to talk to “ soldiers of Christ.
” If you wonder what a devil sounds like , this is it .
Edited clips of Johnson ’ s video quickly spread on social media , shared by conservative media outlets and the president ’ s campaign press communications director .
Many conservatives interpreted Johnson ’ s comments as a call to murder Trump supporters .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ post from the Trump campaign ’ s official Twitter account .
“ Imagine the outrage if a Republican did something even remotely close to this ?
” Some users called for Johnson to resign or face criminal charges .
One video was viewed nearly 1 million times by Wednesday afternoon .
Michigan Republican Party Chairman Laura Cox accused Johnson of inciting violence .
Cox said it was “ distressing ” to hear of threats against Johnson but said the lawmaker “ sunk to the same level as the unhinged individuals who threatened her.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Representative Cynthia Johnson ’ s deranged Facebook rant , ” Cox said in a statement .
“ It is reprehensible that an elected official would call on her ‘ soldiers ’ to make the supporters of an opposing party ‘ pay ’ , and clearly such a statement could incite people to violence.
” Less than two hours later , House Speaker Lee Chatfield , R-Levering , announced that Johnson has been removed from her committee assignments due to her comments .
Chatfield said Johnson could face “ further disciplinary action as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Threats to either Democrats or Republicans are unacceptable and un-American , ” Chatfield said in a statement .
“ They ’ re even more unbecoming of an elected official .
Rep. Johnson has been removed from her committee assignments , and we are looking into further disciplinary action as the proper authorities conduct their own investigations.
” House Democratic Leader Christine Greig called Chatfield ’ s decision to remove Johnson ’ s committee assignments “ partisan theatre.
” She called on Republican leadership to stop “ coddling conspiracy theorists ” agitated over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The perpetuation of meritless and disingenuous claims of election fraud — without the production of any evidence weeks after the general election — continues to fuel an increasingly dangerous and destructive political environment that needlessly removes focus on addressing the significant challenges of the pandemic as it continues to claim the lives and livelihoods of Michiganders across our state and throughout the political spectrum , ” Greig said in a statement .
Conspiracy theorists ?
The woman was blabbering her intentions on social media .
Perhaps , someone needs to get rid of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is ’ political theater , but that ’ s why the people who claim they are against this kind of criminal behavior need to bring justice to those behaving this way and stop “ coddling ” criminals .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Clearly, the Michigan militia is going to have to step it up a bit. First, it was the tyrant in the governor’s mansion abusing her authority over the people she is supposed to serve. Then, it was those in her administration. When militia attempted to arrest her and bring her to trial, they were arrested and demonized despite the Constitutional provisions in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15 for them to do so. Now, Michigan Rep. Cynthia A Johnson, a Democrat from Detroit has been removed from all her House Committee assignments following what was a clearly criminal threat against “Trumpers.”
Mad World News reports:
What fresh hell is this? That’s what you may be asking yourself after watching Democrat Cynthia Johnson’s new three-minute video. You may recall Johnson made headlines for being combative after the Michigan hearing.
She also attacked IT specialist Hima Kolanagireddy as a “liar,” after the Michigan poll watcher gave testimony about the Dominion tabulators and backed up the testimony of Melissa Carone, another IT specialist that was contracted by Dominion to work at the TCF Arena in Detriot.
“You’re allowing people to come in here and lie, and I know they’re lying!” Johnson claimed during the Michigan hearing on December 3.
Fast forward to December 8, and Johnson has a meltdown on Facebook.
“Always provide proof. Nobody cares what your mouth is saying,” Johnson said. “Provide proof. Hit their asses in the pocketbook.”
Johnson then made a claim that someone in Illinois threatened her via voice mail. That’s when she goes on to attack “Trumpers.”
“So, this is just a warning to you Trumpers,” Johnson declared. “Be careful. Walk lightly. We ain’t playing with you. Enough of the shenanigans. Enough is enough. And for those of you who are soldiers—you know how to do it. Do it right. Be in order. Make them pay.”
https://twitter.com/RepStevenSmith/status/1336687087018520576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336687087018520576%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmadworldnews.com%2Fmi-democrat-trumpers-walk%2F
Of course, people called into police, which probably won’t result in anything seeing that Whitmer is still in office. Hint, hint…
“Called Michigan State Police at 517-322-1907 and they said they’re aware of this and have had numerous calls and are actively investigating this threat from @RepCAJohnson. This is outrageous,” tweeted Sidney’s Doppelganger.
https://twitter.com/BadAssTexan1776/status/1336693079684820994?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336693079684820994%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmadworldnews.com%2Fmi-democrat-trumpers-walk%2F
“This is a threat to silence the opposing party by violent means. She is on public record calling for violence across state lines. She clearly calls on her ‘soldiers’ and instructs them ‘Make them pay.’ FBI should investigate,” tweeted Mario Cordon.
This is a threat to silence the opposing party by violent means. She is on public record calling for violence across state lines. She clearly calls on her “soldiers” and instructs them “Make them pay.” FBI should investigate. — Mario Cordon (@DemandHacker) December 9, 2020
The same FBI that was in on spying on the Trump campaign, that failed to deal with the man who wanted to behead Pamela Geller, the same FBI who couldn’t tackle 9/11 properly, and gave a green light to jihadis in Garland Texas, along with failing to bring Hillary Clinton to justice? That FBI? Surely you jest!
“Isn’t she the one in the hearing that only asked for name, spelling and maiden name of a terrified witness? As though she were gonna DOX?” tweeted “Thinkologist.”
https://twitter.com/Thinkologist1/status/1336690053171589123?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336690053171589123%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmadworldnews.com%2Fmi-democrat-trumpers-walk%2F
Here’s the clip referenced.
This is intimidation, pure and simple. pic.twitter.com/qRNRADFuvk — Firas Cheaib (@Firsou) December 3, 2020
She also took to Facebook claiming to talk to “soldiers of Christ.” If you wonder what a devil sounds like, this is it.
Following Johnson’s comments, MLIVE reported:
Edited clips of Johnson’s video quickly spread on social media, shared by conservative media outlets and the president’s campaign press communications director. Many conservatives interpreted Johnson’s comments as a call to murder Trump supporters.
“This is disgraceful,” read one post from the Trump campaign’s official Twitter account. “Imagine the outrage if a Republican did something even remotely close to this?”
Some users called for Johnson to resign or face criminal charges. One video was viewed nearly 1 million times by Wednesday afternoon.
Michigan Republican Party Chairman Laura Cox accused Johnson of inciting violence. Cox said it was “distressing” to hear of threats against Johnson but said the lawmaker “sunk to the same level as the unhinged individuals who threatened her.”
“I am incredibly disturbed by Representative Cynthia Johnson’s deranged Facebook rant,” Cox said in a statement. “It is reprehensible that an elected official would call on her ‘soldiers’ to make the supporters of an opposing party ‘pay’, and clearly such a statement could incite people to violence.”
Less than two hours later, House Speaker Lee Chatfield, R-Levering, announced that Johnson has been removed from her committee assignments due to her comments. Chatfield said Johnson could face “further disciplinary action as the proper authorities conduct their own investigations.”
“Threats to either Democrats or Republicans are unacceptable and un-American,” Chatfield said in a statement. “They’re even more unbecoming of an elected official. Rep. Johnson has been removed from her committee assignments, and we are looking into further disciplinary action as the proper authorities conduct their own investigations.”
House Democratic Leader Christine Greig called Chatfield’s decision to remove Johnson’s committee assignments “partisan theatre.” She called on Republican leadership to stop “coddling conspiracy theorists” agitated over unproven allegations of election fraud.
“The perpetuation of meritless and disingenuous claims of election fraud — without the production of any evidence weeks after the general election — continues to fuel an increasingly dangerous and destructive political environment that needlessly removes focus on addressing the significant challenges of the pandemic as it continues to claim the lives and livelihoods of Michiganders across our state and throughout the political spectrum,” Greig said in a statement.
Conspiracy theorists? The woman was blabbering her intentions on social media. Perhaps, someone needs to get rid of Greig too.
I’ll grant that is’ political theater, but that’s why the people who claim they are against this kind of criminal behavior need to bring justice to those behaving this way and stop “coddling” criminals.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-09--V-Day Arrives In UK:  First Shots Given As Reports Of Several Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Voluntee

V-Day Arrives In UK:  First Shots Given As Reports Of Several Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Volunteers Developed Bell’s Palsy

And here we go with the beginning of what will surely be many reports of the UK government ’ s expected “ high volume of adverse events ” from the Pfizer RNA vaccine .
As V-Day arrives in the UK , the first recipient , outside of trials , of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine got the prick while reports eminate that at least four people who took the vaccine during trials developed facial paralysis known as Bell ’ s Palsy .
Of course , the “ authorities ” are poo pooing anything bad , even though the government ’ s own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adverse events ” from the vaccine .
First , Mac Slavo reports on the first recipient of the vaccine outside of trials .
The first “ high-risk ” person has been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine in the United Kingdom .
The elderly woman says if she can do it , “ so can you.
” Meanwhile , in the US , the FDA published a report Tuesday morning from the panel that convened yesterday to start examining the data from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trials .
They happily declared that there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emergency-approval of Pfizer ’ s vaccine .
The agency is expected to release two reports analyzing the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ahead of Thursday ’ s meeting , with data expected to break down the vaccine ’ s efficacy with various age , ethnic , and other demographic groups .
The agency ’ s own scientists have prepared one report .
The other report has been prepared by scientists with Pfizer and its German partner .
On Thursday , the FDA ’ s vaccine advisory panel will discuss these materials in advance of a vote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will authorize this vaccine .
They have already said there ’ s no reason not to .
All countries are moving toward getting the entire global population vaccinated .
India ’ s federal health secretary Rajesh Bhushan says the government ’ s regulator could grant a license to some developers of COVID-19 vaccines in the next few weeks .
Six vaccines , including Astra Zeneca ’ s Covidshield , and Bharat Biotech ’ s Covaxin , are in trial stages , Bhushan says .
Across the US , states are continuing to tighten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are now under lockdown in and around the Los Angeles area as new “ stay at home orders ” and bans on walking are handed down by the tyrants who seek to own people and control their every move in the Golden State .
As these vaccines roll out , be aware of what ’ s going on in your area .
This is not a normal vaccine and most people are well aware of that .
Make your own decisions .
The best advice is to turn off the TV .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even more so than now ) with Covid vaccine propaganda and commercials , much like earlier in the spring when the government blared their commands to stay home during popular television shows .
Of course , as the day arrives , the UK is also reporting that four trial volunteers who got Pfizer ’ s COVID-19 vaccine developed Bell ’ s palsy .
Yet , the US Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) denies that occurred due to the vaccine .
Right , it just happened to coincide with it .
Wink @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Four people who got Pfizer ‘ s coronavirus vaccine in the firm ’ s trial developed Bell ’ s palsy , a form of temporary facial paralysis , according to U.S. regulators ’ report on the shot .
Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) regulators said there wasn ’ t any clear way that the vaccine caused Bell ’ s palsy , but warned that doctors should watch for the alarming side effect and Pfizer should continue to keep tab on how many people it strikes .
No one knows what exactly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resolves on its own most of the time .
This isn ’ t the first time it ’ s been linked to vaccines , but scientists have ultimately ruled that shots did not trigger Bell ’ s in all but one case – a Swiss flu vaccine that was sold during the 2001-2002 flu season there , then promptly taken off the market .
So far , the FDA said that the number of Bell ’ s palsy cases seen in the Pfizer vaccine trial was ‘ consistent with the background frequency of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine group that is consistent with the expected background rate in the general population , and there is no clear basis upon which to conclude a causal relationship at this time , ’ but will keep a close watch on future cases .
OK , so did you get the doublespeak there ?
First , the FDA said there was no “ clear way that the vaccine caused Bell ’ s palsy ” and then it was followed up with “ the FDA said that the number of Bell ’ s palsy cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ consistent with the background frequency of reported Bell ’ s palsy in the vaccine group that is consistent with the expected background rate in the general population , and there is no clear basis upon which to conclude a causal relationship at this time.
” Give me a break !
These drug pimping thugs can ’ t even get their story straight !
And they are keeping an eye on it , right ?
No , they are engaging in damage control .
It gets better – I mean worse .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were the only side effect that the FDA saw as ‘ imbalanced ’ with more occurring in the vaccine group than the placebo group , and fewer than 0.5 percent of the trial participants had serious side effects .
Among the four people who developed Bell ’ s palsy , one saw facial paralysis or weakness within three days after they received the shot .
But the participant ’ s face returned to normal about three days after that .
A second person developed Bell ’ s palsy nine days after receiving the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grew weak 37 and 48 days after vaccination , respectively .
Each of those three recovered from the facial paralysis in 10 to 21 days .
Bell ’ s palsy comes on suddenly , and looks alarmingly like a stroke .
OK , so hmmm , I deal with whatever CONvid-1984 might actually be , which has a nearly 100 % recovery rate or I deal with a possible adverse reaction , such as something that paralyzes my face and makes me appear like I ’ m having a stroke , which may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to 21 days or I might get a weakened face more than a month after the prick .
No thanks .
If I get sick , I ’ ll just take my chances with rest and building up my immune system , you know , that think the Creator built inside of us so we don ’ t have to listen to drug pushers ?
You really have to be a special kind of stupid to turn yourself over to this kind of pseudo-science .
Article posted with permission from Sons of @ @

And here we go with the beginning of what will surely be many reports of the UK government’s expected “high volume of adverse events” from the Pfizer RNA vaccine. As V-Day arrives in the UK, the first recipient, outside of trials, of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine got the prick while reports eminate that at least four people who took the vaccine during trials developed facial paralysis known as Bell’s Palsy. Of course, the “authorities” are poo pooing anything bad, even though the government’s own documents expect quite a bit of “adverse events” from the vaccine.
First, Mac Slavo reports on the first recipient of the vaccine outside of trials.
The first “high-risk” person has been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine in the United Kingdom. The elderly woman says if she can do it, “so can you.”
It’s here. Time’s up.
"If I can do it, so can you": this 90-year-old UK grandmother has become the first person in the world to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine outside of trials https://t.co/E11VI2TNXE pic.twitter.com/3hzNL2gzzh — SCMP News (@SCMPNews) December 8, 2020
Meanwhile, in the US, the FDA published a report Tuesday morning from the panel that convened yesterday to start examining the data from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trials. They happily declared that there’s “no reason” to delay the emergency-approval of Pfizer’s vaccine. The agency is expected to release two reports analyzing the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine ahead of Thursday’s meeting, with data expected to break down the vaccine’s efficacy with various age, ethnic, and other demographic groups. The agency’s own scientists have prepared one report. The other report has been prepared by scientists with Pfizer and its German partner.
On Thursday, the FDA’s vaccine advisory panel will discuss these materials in advance of a vote on whether to recommend authorization. They will authorize this vaccine. They have already said there’s no reason not to. All countries are moving toward getting the entire global population vaccinated.
India’s federal health secretary Rajesh Bhushan says the government’s regulator could grant a license to some developers of COVID-19 vaccines in the next few weeks. Six vaccines, including Astra Zeneca’s Covidshield, and Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin, are in trial stages, Bhushan says.
Across the US, states are continuing to tighten restrictions as more than 30 million Americans are now under lockdown in and around the Los Angeles area as new “stay at home orders” and bans on walking are handed down by the tyrants who seek to own people and control their every move in the Golden State.
As these vaccines roll out, be aware of what’s going on in your area. This is not a normal vaccine and most people are well aware of that. Make your own decisions. The best advice is to turn off the TV. It’s going to be full (even more so than now) with Covid vaccine propaganda and commercials, much like earlier in the spring when the government blared their commands to stay home during popular television shows.
Of course, as the day arrives, the UK is also reporting that four trial volunteers who got Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine developed Bell’s palsy. Yet, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) denies that occurred due to the vaccine. Right, it just happened to coincide with it. Wink, wink, nod, nod.
The Daily Mail reported:
Four people who got Pfizer‘s coronavirus vaccine in the firm’s trial developed Bell’s palsy, a form of temporary facial paralysis, according to U.S. regulators’ report on the shot.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators said there wasn’t any clear way that the vaccine caused Bell’s palsy, but warned that doctors should watch for the alarming side effect and Pfizer should continue to keep tab on how many people it strikes.
No one knows what exactly causes Bell’s palsy, which resolves on its own most of the time.
This isn’t the first time it’s been linked to vaccines, but scientists have ultimately ruled that shots did not trigger Bell’s in all but one case – a Swiss flu vaccine that was sold during the 2001-2002 flu season there, then promptly taken off the market.
So far, the FDA said that the number of Bell’s palsy cases seen in the Pfizer vaccine trial was ‘consistent with the background frequency of reported Bell’s palsy in the vaccine group that is consistent with the expected background rate in the general population, and there is no clear basis upon which to conclude a causal relationship at this time,’ but will keep a close watch on future cases.
OK, so did you get the doublespeak there? First, the FDA said there was no “clear way that the vaccine caused Bell’s palsy” and then it was followed up with “the FDA said that the number of Bell’s palsy cases seen in the Pfizer vaccine trial was ‘consistent with the background frequency of reported Bell’s palsy in the vaccine group that is consistent with the expected background rate in the general population, and there is no clear basis upon which to conclude a causal relationship at this time.”
Give me a break! These drug pimping thugs can’t even get their story straight! And they are keeping an eye on it, right? No, they are engaging in damage control.
It gets better – I mean worse.
The four cases of Bell’s palsy were the only side effect that the FDA saw as ‘imbalanced’ with more occurring in the vaccine group than the placebo group, and fewer than 0.5 percent of the trial participants had serious side effects.
Among the four people who developed Bell’s palsy, one saw facial paralysis or weakness within three days after they received the shot.
But the participant’s face returned to normal about three days after that.
A second person developed Bell’s palsy nine days after receiving the shot, and the others’ faces grew weak 37 and 48 days after vaccination, respectively.
Each of those three recovered from the facial paralysis in 10 to 21 days.
Bell’s palsy comes on suddenly, and looks alarmingly like a stroke.
OK, so hmmm, I deal with whatever CONvid-1984 might actually be, which has a nearly 100% recovery rate or I deal with a possible adverse reaction, such as something that paralyzes my face and makes me appear like I’m having a stroke, which may return to normal in a few days up to 21 days or I might get a weakened face more than a month after the prick.
No thanks. If I get sick, I’ll just take my chances with rest and building up my immune system, you know, that think the Creator built inside of us so we don’t have to listen to drug pushers?
You really have to be a special kind of stupid to turn yourself over to this kind of pseudo-science.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-09--Google’s YouTube to Censor All Claims of Election Fraud

By “ all ” , we obviously mean all claims coming from Republicans .
Media and their Democrats are still free to upload videos alleging that President Trump is a Russian agent and that Russian bots tilted the election for him in 2016 .
Should they try to make similar claims about President Trump winning Texas due to foreign election interference , voter suppression , or the galactic federation , you can bet that the illegal Big Tech monopoly known as Google or Alphabet won ’ t interfere .
It will only censor conservatives calling out election fraud .
Just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should .
Under the Orwellian title of “ Supporting the 2020 U.S. election ” ( what the hell does supporting an election mean ? )
YouTube announced that as part of its job of “ connecting people with authoritative information ” ( technically the role of a propaganda system , not a platform that makes its money from people uploading stolen content , abusing children , or humiliating themselves on camera in the hopes of making a few bucks ) , the Google platform will now ban allegations of fraud .
“ We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. Presidential election , ” YouTube falsely claims .
In fact , YouTube has not censored any claims about the 2016 election .
Nor is it about to start removing material from Democrats about the 2000 election .
The only election it plans to censor fraud claims about is the one handed to the party and ideology it supports .
Sorry George Orwell , don ’ t bother with any YouTube uploads .
“ As always , news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sufficient education , documentary , scientific or artistic context , ” YouTube argues In other words , the media ’ s content and other lefty content alleging fraud in 2000 and 2016 will be allowed to remain .
“ Given that , we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today ( or anytime after ) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election , in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections , ” YouTube warns .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election is over , as YouTube claims , and there ’ s nothing more to discuss , then what ’ s the harm in discussing it ?
If discussion won ’ t change the outcome of the election , then why censor it ?
Previous Big Tech censorship arguments had been built around the impact of “ misinformation ” on the election .
Since the election is over , the impact will no longer be on the election .
It ’ ll be on the government .
What YouTube is really doing is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that will undermine Biden and the Democrats .
Shouldn ’ t all of YouTube ’ s revenues be treated as an in-kind contribution to the Democrats ?

By “all”, we obviously mean all claims coming from Republicans. Media and their Democrats are still free to upload videos alleging that President Trump is a Russian agent and that Russian bots tilted the election for him in 2016. Should they try to make similar claims about President Trump winning Texas due to foreign election interference, voter suppression, or the galactic federation, you can bet that the illegal Big Tech monopoly known as Google or Alphabet won’t interfere.
It will only censor conservatives calling out election fraud. Just like a component of the Democrat oligarchy should.
Under the Orwellian title of “Supporting the 2020 U.S. election” (what the hell does supporting an election mean?) YouTube announced that as part of its job of “connecting people with authoritative information” (technically the role of a propaganda system, not a platform that makes its money from people uploading stolen content, abusing children, or humiliating themselves on camera in the hopes of making a few bucks), the Google platform will now ban allegations of fraud.
“We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. Presidential election,” YouTube falsely claims.
In fact, YouTube has not censored any claims about the 2016 election. Nor is it about to start removing material from Democrats about the 2000 election. The only election it plans to censor fraud claims about is the one handed to the party and ideology it supports.
Sorry George Orwell, don’t bother with any YouTube uploads.
“As always, news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain on our site if there’s sufficient education, documentary, scientific or artistic context,” YouTube argues
In other words, the media’s content and other lefty content alleging fraud in 2000 and 2016 will be allowed to remain.
“Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections,” YouTube warns.
The obvious question is why. If the election is over, as YouTube claims, and there’s nothing more to discuss, then what’s the harm in discussing it? If discussion won’t change the outcome of the election, then why censor it?
Previous Big Tech censorship arguments had been built around the impact of “misinformation” on the election. Since the election is over, the impact will no longer be on the election.
It’ll be on the government.
What YouTube is really doing is saying that it’s banning content that will undermine Biden and the Democrats.
Shouldn’t all of YouTube’s revenues be treated as an in-kind contribution to the Democrats?
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-09--Sue the Mask Nazis for Slander!

Sue the Mask Nazis for Slander!

I have had enough and it is time to hold people accountable .
When I am out in public and someone says I need to wear a mask , my first question is : “ Why ?
” “ Well , so you don ’ t kill Grandma .
What is wrong with you , Richards ?
Don ’ t you know everyone could be infected ?
” Therein lies the problem .
It is being assumed everyone is bad .
What proof do you have that I am a threat to anyone ?
What evidence do you have ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ am not infected ?
You are the one making the wild accusations .
I demand you produce the proof !
The Law dictionary defines slander as : “ oral defamation ; spoken words that defame a person in front of others and that cause harm or some damage.
” It defines defamation as : “ The publication of material injurious to a person ’ s good name and reputation .
Includes both libel and slander.
” Some governors and media people have been claiming that if you do not wear a mask , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people are assuming all people are bad .
Here is one example : “ Where is your mask ?
” This exchange I had in a store shows that the person is automatically assuming that everyone is infected , or everyone is bad .
Therefore , since everyone is infected , everyone must receive the medical procedure of wearing a mask or the public will not tolerate their badness .
Of course , the next accusation is going to be : “ If you do not get a vaccine , you are infecting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ If you do not get a vaccine , you are bad.
” Maybe we should pronounce that as baaaaaad .
You know , the sound sheep make “ baaaa.
” Again , why is it being assumed everyone is bad ?
What proof do you have that I am a threat to anyone ?
What evidence do you have ?
Why should I have to prove I am not infected ?
You are the one making the wild accusations .
I demand you produce the proof .
Anyone who tells me to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ show evidence that proves I am infected .
No evidence , then I am going to sue them for slander .
I am done with this .
If you are going to claim I am bad for not wearing a mask , you better have some proof or you are going to get sued .
I am done with it .
I have had it with the media whipping up the public with their wild claims to the point that a huge number of people now assume everyone is infected and everyone should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they exist .
Because I am assumed bad , I must perform whatever the ritual it is they claim will make me good : Wear a mask , social distance , and on and on it goes .
It does not work that way .
If you are going to claim I am infected , you better have proof .
If not , once I am suing you for slander , I am going to make you produce it in discovery .
What symptoms do you claim I have ?
What tests do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do you claim says I am infected ?
What is the name of that doctor ’ s malpractice insurance company ?
It makes me wonder when bars and restaurants will file their lawsuits against the people that slandered them .
It has been claimed that people get infected in bars and restaurants .
What is the proof of that accusation ?
What test shows the infection happens in a bar and not Wal-Mart ?
If certain governors and media people are going to claim bars and restaurants hurt people they should have proof @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would require the people who are making the accusations to produce the evidence .
If there is no evidence , then they need to pay for the damages they caused .
Bars and restaurants have been afraid of being sued because someone might claim they got COVID in their establishment .
It is time for bars and restaurants to ask for the evidence .
If there is no evidence , make the people hurting the bars and restaurants pay for the damages .
The time is long past that the people making these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been said you can not scream fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire .
What is never-ending COVID coverage , if not screaming fire in a crowded theater ?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media .
Article by Steve Richards

I have had enough and it is time to hold people accountable. When I am out in public and someone says I need to wear a mask, my first question is: “Why?”
“Well, so you don’t kill Grandma. What is wrong with you, Richards? Don’t you know everyone could be infected?”
Therein lies the problem. It is being assumed everyone is bad. What proof do you have that I am a threat to anyone? What evidence do you have? Why should I have to prove I am not infected? You are the one making the wild accusations. I demand you produce the proof!
The Law dictionary defines slander as: “oral defamation; spoken words that defame a person in front of others and that cause harm or some damage.” It defines defamation as: “The publication of material injurious to a person’s good name and reputation. Includes both libel and slander.”
Some governors and media people have been claiming that if you do not wear a mask, you are hurting people. Now, people are assuming all people are bad. Here is one example: “Where is your mask?”
“What’s it to you?”
“You are infecting the place.”
This exchange I had in a store shows that the person is automatically assuming that everyone is infected, or everyone is bad. Therefore, since everyone is infected, everyone must receive the medical procedure of wearing a mask or the public will not tolerate their badness.
Of course, the next accusation is going to be: “If you do not get a vaccine, you are infecting people.”
They are basically saying: “If you do not get a vaccine, you are bad.”
Maybe we should pronounce that as baaaaaad. You know, the sound sheep make “baaaa.” Again, why is it being assumed everyone is bad? What proof do you have that I am a threat to anyone? What evidence do you have? Why should I have to prove I am not infected? You are the one making the wild accusations. I demand you produce the proof.
Anyone who tells me to wear a mask better be ready to show evidence that proves I am infected. No evidence, then I am going to sue them for slander. I am done with this. If you are going to claim I am bad for not wearing a mask, you better have some proof or you are going to get sued. I am done with it. I have had it with the media whipping up the public with their wild claims to the point that a huge number of people now assume everyone is infected and everyone should be feared for no other reason than they exist. Because I am assumed bad, I must perform whatever the ritual it is they claim will make me good: Wear a mask, social distance, and on and on it goes.
It does not work that way. If you are going to claim I am infected, you better have proof. If not, once I am suing you for slander, I am going to make you produce it in discovery. What symptoms do you claim I have? What tests do you claim were done? What doctor do you claim says I am infected? What is the name of that doctor’s malpractice insurance company?
It makes me wonder when bars and restaurants will file their lawsuits against the people that slandered them. It has been claimed that people get infected in bars and restaurants. What is the proof of that accusation? What test shows the infection happens in a bar and not Wal-Mart? If certain governors and media people are going to claim bars and restaurants hurt people they should have proof, not speculation. A slander lawsuit would require the people who are making the accusations to produce the evidence. If there is no evidence, then they need to pay for the damages they caused.
Bars and restaurants have been afraid of being sued because someone might claim they got COVID in their establishment. It is time for bars and restaurants to ask for the evidence. If there is no evidence, make the people hurting the bars and restaurants pay for the damages. The time is long past that the people making these wild accusations be held accountable.
It has been said you cannot scream fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire. What is never-ending COVID coverage, if not screaming fire in a crowded theater?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media. Article by Steve Richards