thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-20--Infiltration Tactics & The Staged Dialectical Trap

It seems we have arrived at the long-anticipated day so many Americans hoped would never come .
Despite the abundance of information , the warning signs and the self-evident truth that something was amiss , the majority went about their daily lives believing everything was fine and that “ it would never happen here.
” Some even proclaimed that it wouldn ’ t happen in their lifetime while acknowledging the obvious dangers ̶ therefore , they believed they didn ’ t have to worry .
Things are not fine .
We are on the verge of yet another carefully orchestrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country forever .
The hard left has made their move and the patriots are responding in kind .
The tensions are building in Virginia as the Governor has declared a state of emergency .
A fenced-in area has been built for the lobby day protesters to be herded into .
A so-called free speech zone if you will .
People on the ground are reporting that Antifa plans to attend the rally dressed up as Trump supporters intending to commit acts of violence against others posing as peaceful anti-gun activists .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a webpage called Virginia is for Film Lovers that went out on the fourteenth of January .
All the pieces are in place for another false flag event designed to discredit gun owners and potentially , label us all as domestic terrorists .
Even Virginia state senator Amanda Chase is exposing this agenda .
Gun owners , veterans , Christians and anti-abortion activists have been considered potential “ right-wing extremists ” by the federal government for a long time .
The developing situation in Virginia , which surely will be televised for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stage show designed to demonstrate the need for gun confiscation by portraying American gun owners as dangerous and unhinged .
Many Americans , even when presented with hard evidence , will refuse to believe that the government , whether it be state or federal , would deliberately do this to their own people .
In May of 2012 , the Obama administration passed the national defense authorization act which , to put it simply , legalized the use of misinformation campaigns directed at the American people .
This was a mere six months @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which many claimed was also a hoax to push gun control .
Sandy Hook was the first of many mass shootings to come , all accompanied by hysteric calls for gun control before any information was even released .
Another example of a staged even was the Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville .
The man responsible for organizing the rally , Jason Kessler , was an Obama supporting Occupy Wallstreet organizer who allegedly switched sides after a so-called political awakening .
The event was designed to lure in right-wing Trump supporters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violent , uncontrollable extremists .
The man never switched sides ; he was an agent provocateur .
Unfortunately , our government has a long history of doing this .
In the 1980s , when the militia movement was strong , the FBI formed a group called the Veterans Arayan Movement for the explicit purpose of trying to recruit so-called right-wing extremists into committing acts of violence .
Despite believing that the right posed an imminent threat to national security no intent to commit violent crimes was ever uncovered .
They did , however @ @ @ @ @ @ @ try to invent some .
In 1996 FBI agents planted bomb-making material onto the property of Georgia militia members , attempting to portray them as terrorists .
During the recent Oregon mining standoff , FBI agents were allegedly exposed posing as militia members and breaking into the local national guard armory , trying to give the impression that right-wingers were intent on starting a violent revolution .
In 2017 , the parents of a man diagnosed as schizophrenic exposed the FBI recruiting and grooming their son to commit a bombing at an Oklahoma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the three percenter ideology that so many patriots identify with .
The parents claim the FBI knew their son was schizophrenic but drove on with their operation to frame him anyway .
These are just a few examples of what can be called infiltration tactics .
The protests in Virginia will undoubtedly be egged on by extremists posing as right-wing conservatives to justify a need for gun confiscation .
The goal is to create fear and uncertainty .
A sense of unease among our neighbors and friends that the man wearing an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flag is a potential extremist .
Worry over the man across the street who is commonly seen loading his rifle into the back of his truck for a day at the range .
More importantly , it is simply being staged to create the necessary chaos to get the ignorant masses to demand something be done to keep us all safe .
The trap of the Hegelian Dialectic .

It seems we have arrived at the long-anticipated day so many Americans hoped would never come. Despite the abundance of information, the warning signs and the self-evident truth that something was amiss, the majority went about their daily lives believing everything was fine and that “it would never happen here.” Some even proclaimed that it wouldn’t happen in their lifetime while acknowledging the obvious dangers ̶ therefore, they believed they didn’t have to worry. Things are not fine. We are on the verge of yet another carefully orchestrated event that has the potential to change the country forever. The hard left has made their move and the patriots are responding in kind.
The tensions are building in Virginia as the Governor has declared a state of emergency. A fenced-in area has been built for the lobby day protesters to be herded into. A so-called free speech zone if you will.
People on the ground are reporting that Antifa plans to attend the rally dressed up as Trump supporters intending to commit acts of violence against others posing as peaceful anti-gun activists.
There was also an ad for crisis actors on a webpage called Virginia is for Film Lovers that went out on the fourteenth of January.
All the pieces are in place for another false flag event designed to discredit gun owners and potentially, label us all as domestic terrorists.
This isn’t a crazy conspiracy theory.
Even Virginia state senator Amanda Chase is exposing this agenda.
Gun owners, veterans, Christians and anti-abortion activists have been considered potential “right-wing extremists” by the federal government for a long time.
The developing situation in Virginia, which surely will be televised for the world to see, is a stage show designed to demonstrate the need for gun confiscation by portraying American gun owners as dangerous and unhinged.
Many Americans, even when presented with hard evidence, will refuse to believe that the government, whether it be state or federal, would deliberately do this to their own people.
In May of 2012, the Obama administration passed the national defense authorization act which, to put it simply, legalized the use of misinformation campaigns directed at the American people.
This was a mere six months before the alleged tragedy at Sandy Hook, which many claimed was also a hoax to push gun control.
Sandy Hook was the first of many mass shootings to come, all accompanied by hysteric calls for gun control before any information was even released.
Another example of a staged even was the Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville.
The man responsible for organizing the rally, Jason Kessler, was an Obama supporting Occupy Wallstreet organizer who allegedly switched sides after a so-called political awakening.
The event was designed to lure in right-wing Trump supporters and make it look like they were violent, uncontrollable extremists.
The man never switched sides; he was an agent provocateur.
Unfortunately, our government has a long history of doing this. In the 1980s, when the militia movement was strong, the FBI formed a group called the Veterans Arayan Movement for the explicit purpose of trying to recruit so-called right-wing extremists into committing acts of violence.
Despite believing that the right posed an imminent threat to national security no intent to commit violent crimes was ever uncovered.
They did, however, under the program name COINTELPRO, try to invent some.
In 1996 FBI agents planted bomb-making material onto the property of Georgia militia members, attempting to portray them as terrorists.
During the recent Oregon mining standoff, FBI agents were allegedly exposed posing as militia members and breaking into the local national guard armory, trying to give the impression that right-wingers were intent on starting a violent revolution.
In 2017, the parents of a man diagnosed as schizophrenic exposed the FBI recruiting and grooming their son to commit a bombing at an Oklahoma City bank.
The man allegedly clung to the three percenter ideology that so many patriots identify with.
The parents claim the FBI knew their son was schizophrenic but drove on with their operation to frame him anyway.
These are just a few examples of what can be called infiltration tactics.
The protests in Virginia will undoubtedly be egged on by extremists posing as right-wing conservatives to justify a need for gun confiscation.
The goal is to create fear and uncertainty.
A sense of unease among our neighbors and friends that the man wearing an American flag shirt or flying his Gadsden flag is a potential extremist.
Worry over the man across the street who is commonly seen loading his rifle into the back of his truck for a day at the range.
More importantly, it is simply being staged to create the necessary chaos to get the ignorant masses to demand something be done to keep us all safe.
The trap of the Hegelian Dialectic.
Article posted with permission from David Risselada


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-20--An Armed Society Spends More Time Stopping Evil than Contemplating It

We are not a violent society .
We are a society sheltered from violence .
No one in Rwanda spends time wondering what kind of man would murder people .
They probably live next door to him .
If your neighborhood is diverse enough , you might be unfortunate enough to live next door to war criminals all the way from Eastern Europe to Africa .
Guns are how we misspell evil .
Guns are how we avoid talking about the ugly realities of human nature while building sandcastles on the shores of utopia .
It ’ s not about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can do in a crowded place , but about the precariousness of social control that the killing sprees expose .
Every murder tears apart the myth that government is the answer .
The gun control issue is about solving individual evil through central planning in a shelter big enough for everyone .
A Gun Free Zone where everyone is a target and lives under the illusion that they aren ’ t .
A society where everyone is drawing peace signs on colored notepaper while waiting under their desks for the bomb to fall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t authority ; it ’ s authority in panic mode , believing that if it imposes total zero tolerance control , then there will be no more shootings .
And every time the dumb paradigm is blown to bits with another shotgun , then the rush is on to reinforce it with more total zero control tolerance .
Zero tolerance for the Second Amendment makes sense .
If you ban all guns , except for those in the hands of the 708,000 police officers , some of the 1.5 million members of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ armored cars and banks , the bodyguards of celebrities who call for gun control , and any of the other people who need a gun to do their job , then you ’ re sure to stop all shootings .
So long as none of those millions of people , or their tens of millions of kids , spouses , parents , grandchildren , girlfriends , boyfriends , roommates and anyone else who has access to them and their living spaces , carries out one of those shootings .
But this isn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s about the belief that the problem is individual , not evil , and that if we make sure that everyone who has guns is following government orders , then control will be asserted , and the problem will stop .
We ’ ll never know the full number of people who were killed by Fast and Furious .
We ’ ll never know how many were killed by Obama ’ s regime change operation in Libya , with repercussions in Mali and Syria .
But everyone involved in that was following @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , just agencies .
There were orders to run guns to Mexico and the cartel gunmen who killed people had orders to shoot .
There was nothing random or unpredictable about it .
Gun control is the assertion that the problem is not the guns ; it ’ s the lack of central planning for shooting people .
It ’ s the individual .
Moral agency is individual .
You can ’ t outsource it to the government , and you wouldn ’ t want to .
The impulses , the codes of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrong , take place at the level of the individual .
Organizations do not sanctify this process .
They do not lift it above its fallacies or do a very good job of keeping sociopaths and murderers from rising high enough to give orders .
Gun control does not control guns , it gives the illusion of controlling people , and when it fails those in authority are able to say that they did everything that they could short of giving people the ability to defend themselves .
We live under the rule @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committed to bring their perfect state into being through the absolute control over people , and the violent acts of lone madmen are a reminder that such control is fleeting and that attempting to control a problem often makes it worse by removing the natural human crowd sourced responses that would otherwise come into play .
Anyone , who really hankers after a world without guns , would do well to try the 12th Century , which was not a nicer place for lack of guns .
The same firepower that makes it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a dozen unarmed people also makes it that much harder to recreate a world where a single family can rule over millions and one man in armor can terrify hundreds of peasants .
Putting miniature cannons in the hands of every peasant made the American Revolution possible .
The ideals of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution would have meant very little without an army of ordinary men armed with weapons that made them a match for the superior organization and numbers of a world power .
Would Thomas Jefferson , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who famously wrote , “ The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants ” , really have shuddered at the idea of peasants with assault rifles , or would he have grinned at the playing field being leveled ?
But the Democratic Party is no longer the party of Thomas Jefferson .
It ’ s the party of King George III .
It doesn ’ t like the idea of armed peasants , not because an occasional peasant goes on a shooting spree @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mad king , who liked to talk to trees , it believes that government power comes before individual liberty .
Like that dead king , it believes that it means this for the benefit of the peasants who will be better off being told what to do .
The question is the old elemental one about government control and individual agency .
And tragedies like the one that just happened take us back to the equally old question of whether individual liberty is a better defense against human evil than the entrenched organizations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really guns that the gun controllers are afraid of ; it ’ s a country where individual agency is still superior to organized control , where the trains don ’ t run on time and orders don ’ t mean anything .
It ’ s afraid of individual power .
Evil finds heavy firepower appealing , but the firepower works both ways .
A world where the peasants have assault rifles is a world where peasants no longer means a man without any rights .
And while it may also mean the occasional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to happen in the outposts of utopia , the gun-free zones with zero tolerance for firearms .
An occasional peasant may go on a killing spree , but a society where the peasants are all armed is also far more able to stop such a thing without waiting for the men-at-arms to be dispatched from the castle .
An armed society spends more time stopping evil than contemplating it .
It is the disarmed society that is always contemplating it as a thing beyond its control .
Helpless people must find something to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and princes to do something about the killing .
Instead of doing something about it themselves , they blame the freedom that left the killer free to kill , instead of the lack of freedom that prevented them from being able to stop him .

We are not a violent society. We are a society sheltered from violence. No one in Rwanda spends time wondering what kind of man would murder people. They probably live next door to him. If your neighborhood is diverse enough, you might be unfortunate enough to live next door to war criminals all the way from Eastern Europe to Africa.
Guns are how we misspell evil. Guns are how we avoid talking about the ugly realities of human nature while building sandcastles on the shores of utopia.
It’s not about the fear of what one motivated maniac can do in a crowded place, but about the precariousness of social control that the killing sprees expose. Every murder tears apart the myth that government is the answer.
The gun control issue is about solving individual evil through central planning in a shelter big enough for everyone. A Gun Free Zone where everyone is a target and lives under the illusion that they aren’t. A society where everyone is drawing peace signs on colored notepaper while waiting under their desks for the bomb to fall.
That brand of control isn’t authority; it’s authority in panic mode, believing that if it imposes total zero tolerance control, then there will be no more shootings. And every time the dumb paradigm is blown to bits with another shotgun, then the rush is on to reinforce it with more total zero control tolerance.
Zero tolerance for the Second Amendment makes sense. If you ban all guns, except for those in the hands of the 708,000 police officers, some of the 1.5 million members of the armed forces, the security guards at armored cars and banks, the bodyguards of celebrities who call for gun control, and any of the other people who need a gun to do their job, then you’re sure to stop all shootings.
So long as none of those millions of people, or their tens of millions of kids, spouses, parents, grandchildren, girlfriends, boyfriends, roommates and anyone else who has access to them and their living spaces, carries out one of those shootings.
But this isn’t really about stopping shootings; it’s about the belief that the problem is individual, not evil, and that if we make sure that everyone who has guns is following government orders, then control will be asserted, and the problem will stop.
It’s the central planning solution to evil.
We’ll never know the full number of people who were killed by Fast and Furious. We’ll never know how many were killed by Obama’s regime change operation in Libya, with repercussions in Mali and Syria. But everyone involved in that was following orders. There was no individual agency, just agencies. There were orders to run guns to Mexico and the cartel gunmen who killed people had orders to shoot. There was nothing random or unpredictable about it.
Gun control is the assertion that the problem is not the guns; it’s the lack of central planning for shooting people. It’s the individual.
A few million people with little sleep, taut nerves and PTSD are not a problem so long as there is someone to give them orders. A hundred million people with guns and no orders are a major problem. Historically though it’s millions of people with guns who follow orders who have been more of a problem than millions of people with guns who do not.
Moral agency is individual. You can’t outsource it to the government, and you wouldn’t want to.
The impulses, the codes of character, the concepts of right and wrong, take place at the level of the individual.
Organizations do not sanctify this process. They do not lift it above its fallacies or do a very good job of keeping sociopaths and murderers from rising high enough to give orders.
Gun control does not control guns, it gives the illusion of controlling people, and when it fails those in authority are able to say that they did everything that they could short of giving people the ability to defend themselves.
We live under the rule of organizers, community and otherwise, committed to bring their perfect state into being through the absolute control over people, and the violent acts of lone madmen are a reminder that such control is fleeting and that attempting to control a problem often makes it worse by removing the natural human crowd sourced responses that would otherwise come into play.
People do kill people and the only way to stop that is by killing them first. To a utopian this is a moral paradox that invalidates everything that came before it, but to everyone else, it’s just life in a world where evil is a reality, not just a word.
Anyone, who really hankers after a world without guns, would do well to try the 12th Century, which was not a nicer place for lack of guns. The same firepower that makes it possible for one homicidal maniac to kill a dozen unarmed people also makes it that much harder to recreate a world where a single family can rule over millions and one man in armor can terrify hundreds of peasants.
Putting miniature cannons in the hands of every peasant made the American Revolution possible. The ideals of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution would have meant very little without an army of ordinary men armed with weapons that made them a match for the superior organization and numbers of a world power.
Would Thomas Jefferson, the abiding figurehead of the Democratic Party, who famously wrote, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants”, really have shuddered at the idea of peasants with assault rifles, or would he have grinned at the playing field being leveled?
But the Democratic Party is no longer the party of Thomas Jefferson. It’s the party of King George III. It doesn’t like the idea of armed peasants, not because an occasional peasant goes on a shooting spree, but because like a certain dead mad king, who liked to talk to trees, it believes that government power comes before individual liberty. Like that dead king, it believes that it means this for the benefit of the peasants who will be better off being told what to do.
The question is the old elemental one about government control and individual agency. And tragedies like the one that just happened take us back to the equally old question of whether individual liberty is a better defense against human evil than the entrenched organizations of government.
Do we want a society run by kings and princes, who commit atrocities according to plan for a better society, or by peasants with machine guns? The kings can promise us a world without evil, but the peasant with a machine gun promises us that we can protect ourselves from evil when it comes calling.
It isn’t really guns that the gun controllers are afraid of; it’s a country where individual agency is still superior to organized control, where the trains don’t run on time and orders don’t mean anything. It’s afraid of individual power.
Evil finds heavy firepower appealing, but the firepower works both ways.
A world where the peasants have assault rifles is a world where peasants no longer means a man without any rights. And while it may also mean the occasional brutal shooting spree, those sprees tend to happen in the outposts of utopia, the gun-free zones with zero tolerance for firearms. An occasional peasant may go on a killing spree, but a society where the peasants are all armed is also far more able to stop such a thing without waiting for the men-at-arms to be dispatched from the castle.
An armed society spends more time stopping evil than contemplating it. It is the disarmed society that is always contemplating it as a thing beyond its control.
Helpless people must find something to think about while waiting for their kings and princes to do something about the killing. Instead of doing something about it themselves, they blame the freedom that left the killer free to kill, instead of the lack of freedom that prevented them from being able to stop him.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-20--Puerto Ricans Outraged After Unused American Aid Found Rotting in Warehouse

It is amazing how far the reach of Trump ’ s political opponents is .
Did The Deep State or other Trump political opponents have enough reach to cause America ’ s Relief donations to simply disappear ?
Or was it corruption in Puerto Rico ?
I ’ d say it was probably both , but Puerto Ricans are angry after a whole warehouse full of American aid has been found .
Sixteen billion more is coming their way .
This time around , President Trump is trying to manage the money but Democrats are fighting it .
The Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dollars in disaster relief for Puerto Rico , laying out conditions on how the money must be budgeted and spent .
 To receive the more than $ 16 billion in grant funding , Puerto Rico must submit detailed budgets , ignore its $ 15-an-hour minimum wage on federally funded projects and reform record-keeping around real estate properties , U.S. officials said .
SAN JUAN , Puerto Rico — People in a southern Puerto Rico city discovered a warehouse filled with water , cots and other unused emergency supplies , then set off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ broke in to retrieve goods as the area struggles to recover from a strong earthquake .
With anger spreading in the U.S. territory after video of the event in Ponce appeared on Facebook , Gov .
Wanda Vázquez quickly fired the director of the island ’ s emergency management agency .
The governor said she had ordered an investigation after learning the emergency supplies had been piled in the warehouse since Hurricane Maria battered Puerto Rico in September 2017 .
America has a real problem with foreign aid not reaching the intended recipients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we were airdropping supplies and weapons that were being “ hijacked ” by ISIS .
• OOPSIES !
ISIS Video Shows U.S. ‘ Accidentally ’ Airdropped Weapons to the Terrorists in Syria • Are American Planes Routinely Dropping Weapons to ISIS Fighters in Iraq ?
We had several articles like the above and the question remains if it was intentional or not .
I tend to think it was .
The same question is valid here .
Did some powerful American politicians make sure it did not reach the intended target ?
Let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had its very own Puerto Rico scandal .
• How Obama ’ s Senior Response Director Profited From Disaster in Puerto Rico Could this be an extension of that operation ?
You never know .

It is amazing how far the reach of Trump’s political opponents is.
Did The Deep State or other Trump political opponents have enough reach to cause America’s Relief donations to simply disappear?
Or was it corruption in Puerto Rico?
I’d say it was probably both, but Puerto Ricans are angry after a whole warehouse full of American aid has been found.
From Wise Young Man:
Sixteen billion more is coming their way. This time around, President Trump is trying to manage the money but Democrats are fighting it.
The Trump administration imposed financial controls on billions of dollars in disaster relief for Puerto Rico, laying out conditions on how the money must be budgeted and spent.

To receive the more than $16 billion in grant funding, Puerto Rico must submit detailed budgets, ignore its $15-an-hour minimum wage on federally funded projects and reform record-keeping around real estate properties, U.S. officials said.
…
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico — People in a southern Puerto Rico city discovered a warehouse filled with water, cots and other unused emergency supplies, then set off a social media uproar Saturday when they broke in to retrieve goods as the area struggles to recover from a strong earthquake.
With anger spreading in the U.S. territory after video of the event in Ponce appeared on Facebook, Gov. Wanda Vázquez quickly fired the director of the island’s emergency management agency.
The governor said she had ordered an investigation after learning the emergency supplies had been piled in the warehouse since Hurricane Maria battered Puerto Rico in September 2017.
Read it all…
#####
America has a real problem with foreign aid not reaching the intended recipients.
Remember, during the Obama years we were airdropping supplies and weapons that were being “hijacked” by ISIS.
We had several articles like the above and the question remains if it was intentional or not.
I tend to think it was.
I believe The Obama Admin deliberately supplied ISIS.
The same question is valid here.
America sent aid to Puerto Rico.
Did some powerful American politicians make sure it did not reach the intended target?
Maybe.
Let’s not forget The Obama Administration had its very own Puerto Rico scandal.
Could this be an extension of that operation?
You never know.
Politics is a dirty game.
Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-20--Missouri:  State Rep. Introduces Legislation Criminalizing Drag Queen Story Hours at State Libraries

Missouri:  State Rep. Introduces Legislation Criminalizing Drag Queen Story Hours at State Libraries – Violators Face Fines & Possible Prison

In 2020 America has become a land of perversion where some parents willingly allow their children to be exposed to the most scandalous of adult mentors — drag queens .
Local library systems all over America are sponsoring it .
When libraries say NO , politicians step in .
• Library System Rejected “ Drag Queen Story Hour ” so Atlanta Mayor Held it at CITY HALL Many Americans keep waiting for their elected representatives to step in and do something .
One Missouri lawmaker has grown disgusted of this movement and has plans to put a stop to it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawmaker in Missouri has introduced a bill targeting drag queen story hour events at public libraries that would set up parental review boards to approve events and penalize librarians with potential fines and jail time for violations .
State Rep. Ben Baker ’ s Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act would require all Missouri public libraries to establish parental review boards , with members elected by voters , that would approve library display material and events .
Baker said Thursday the proposed bill is not aimed at censoring books but is a response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been held at libraries in some of the state ’ s larger cities , including St. Louis , Kansas City and St. Joseph .
“ They ’ ve had these drag queen story hours , and that ’ s something that I take objection to and I think a lot of parents do , ” Baker said .
“ That ’ s where in a public space , our kids could be exposed to something that ’ s age-inappropriate .
That ’ s what I ’ m trying to tackle.
” Under the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comply with the decisions of the parental review boards would be guilty of a misdemeanor , which carries a $ 500 fine and up to a year in prison .
Baker ’ s constituency of Neosho has never hosted a drag queen event at its public libraries , but their popularity in large cities like St. Louis , where an event attracted 500 people in September , has sparked indignation from conservatives across the state .
Ben Baker ’ s Bill can be read here .
Missouri is my home state and Neosho @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually less than an hour from my home .
We don ’ t have much support for Drag Queen perversion in Southwest Missouri .
This is very much part of the Bible Belt .
If one of those Drag Queens were to show up at one of our small town libraries , they might honestly be in danger .
I ’ m not saying that is right but it is reality in The Ozarks .
So do we have enough support in our legislature to counteract liberal cesspools like St. Louis and Kansas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ something must be done .
• Gay City Councilman Calls Police on His Mother After She Meets to Discuss Drag Queen Story Hour With Him • Texas School District Allowed Drag Queen “ Miss Kitty Litter ATX ” To Read To Children Knowing He Was A Sex Offender • Out of Control Drag Queen Flashes Crotch to Kids at Library Story Hour in Minnesota • Drag Queen Does STRIP TEASE for Kids at King County Library How is any of this perversion OK for children of Missouri or any other state ?
America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agenda that has been gaining momentum for years .
Liberals intend to turn this country into a modern day example of Sodom and Gomorrah .
For those who have Christian beliefs , you know what that means .
If not , please explain to me how grown men in dresses flashing their crotches at your children is educational .
Please notice that these Drag Queens are growing more and bolder as time goes on .
Before long they will be arousing & pleasing themselves in front of our children as the adults in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that have to do with educating our kids ?
What a sick agenda the liberals continue to push .

In 2020 America has become a land of perversion where some parents willingly allow their children to be exposed to the most scandalous of adult mentors — drag queens.
Local library systems all over America are sponsoring it.
When libraries say NO, politicians step in.
Many Americans keep waiting for their elected representatives to step in and do something.
One Missouri lawmaker has grown disgusted of this movement and has plans to put a stop to it in his home state.
From NBC News:
A Republican lawmaker in Missouri has introduced a bill targeting drag queen story hour events at public libraries that would set up parental review boards to approve events and penalize librarians with potential fines and jail time for violations.
State Rep. Ben Baker’s Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act would require all Missouri public libraries to establish parental review boards, with members elected by voters, that would approve library display material and events.
Baker said Thursday the proposed bill is not aimed at censoring books but is a response to drag queen story hours that have been held at libraries in some of the state’s larger cities, including St. Louis, Kansas City and St. Joseph.
“They’ve had these drag queen story hours, and that’s something that I take objection to and I think a lot of parents do,” Baker said. “That’s where in a public space, our kids could be exposed to something that’s age-inappropriate. That’s what I’m trying to tackle.”
Under the proposed bill, librarians who do not comply with the decisions of the parental review boards would be guilty of a misdemeanor, which carries a $500 fine and up to a year in prison.
Baker’s constituency of Neosho has never hosted a drag queen event at its public libraries, but their popularity in large cities like St. Louis, where an event attracted 500 people in September, has sparked indignation from conservatives across the state.
Read the rest…
#####
Ben Baker’s Bill can be read here.
Missouri is my home state and Neosho, Baker’s district, is actually less than an hour from my home.
We don’t have much support for Drag Queen perversion in Southwest Missouri.
This is very much part of the Bible Belt.
Southwest Missouri loves God, Guns, Family and conservative values.
If one of those Drag Queens were to show up at one of our small town libraries, they might honestly be in danger.
I’m not saying that is right but it is reality in The Ozarks.
So do we have enough support in our legislature to counteract liberal cesspools like St. Louis and Kansas City?
Time will tell, but something must be done.
How is any of this perversion OK for children of Missouri or any other state?
America is falling under the spell of an agenda that has been gaining momentum for years.
Liberals intend to turn this country into a modern day example of Sodom and Gomorrah.
For those who have Christian beliefs, you know what that means.
If not, please explain to me how grown men in dresses flashing their crotches at your children is educational.
Please notice that these Drag Queens are growing more and bolder as time goes on.
Before long they will be arousing & pleasing themselves in front of our children as the adults in attendance continue to applaud.
What does that have to do with educating our kids?
What a sick agenda the liberals continue to push.
We must push back.
Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-20--New Bill To Allow Cops To Detain Citizens, Force Them To Explain Who They Are & What They’re Doing

New Bill To Allow Cops To Detain Citizens , Force Them To Explain Who They Are & What They ’ re Doing Kentucky — An ominous bill that is currently making its way through the Kentucky Senate aims to give police unprecedented unconstitutional powers .
These new powers will allow cops to stop anyone they want and demand that person tell them who they are , where they are going , and explain their actions .
Naturally , it has civil rights advocates up in arms , but it doesn ’ t seem to be slowing down the bill ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make an unsubstantiated claim that a person is involved in criminal activity which gives them free reign to stop that person , demand his name , home address and age — as well as ask to see his driver ’ s license , if he has one — and tell him to explain what he is presently doing “ to the satisfaction of the officer.
” If you invoke your constitutional right not to answer the officer ’ s questions , this new bill grants cops the right to detain you for two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that this detainment is not considered an arrest so you have no right to an attorney and police don ’ t even have to record it .
This non-arrest grey area detention will undoubtedly be rife for abuse .
Nevertheless , advocates for the police state tyranny say cops must have this new ability—to keep us safe .
As Kentucky.com reports , Sen. Stephen Meredith , R-Leitchfield , said Grayson County law enforcement officials asked him for the bill after a number of local incidents showed the need for it .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why wouldn ’ t you want to know what his name is ?
” Meredith said in an interview .
“ I can ’ t imagine any legitimate reason in the world why a person would refuse to give their name and photo identification to a police officer if they were asked.
” In other words , if you have nothing to hide , you have nothing to fear…or , in other words , submit to the police state .
Wrong !
Well Sen. Meredith , we ’ d like to educate you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ talk to police—because it is our right not to !
Legislation like this is straight out of the playbook of every tyranny in history .
Remember “ Ihre Papiere , Bitte ” ?
That phrase often brought shudders to the people who heard it in the 1930s and ’ 40s .
It is German for “ Your papers , please , ” and this bill is nearly identical to that sinister Nazi policy .
Critics of the bill are pointing out its obvious unconstitutional nature and note out how cops can already go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committing a crime .
As Kentucky.com reports : Critics say Meredith ’ s bill would violate the Fourth Amendment ’ s protection against unreasonable search and seizure and the Fifth Amendment ’ s protection against self-incrimination .
Police officers already have the right to approach people on the street and ask their names , but it ’ s established that citizens can refuse to respond , said Aaron Tucek , a legal fellow at the ACLU of Kentucky .
If police can show reasonable suspicion that someone is carrying a deadly weapon , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Tucek said .
But they can not detain people simply for not identifying themselves or explaining their activities “ to the satisfaction of the officer , ” Tucek said .
“ The whole section of the bill on detention — they can call it whatever they want , but Supreme Court case law is pretty clear that an arrest is not determined by whether you call it an arrest , it ’ s determined by the restraint you place on someone ’ s liberty , ” Tucek said .
“ If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police car or if you take them down to the police station or if you otherwise refuse to let them go their own way , that ’ s an arrest , and in our country , you can not do that without probable cause.
” We agree and so does the constitution .
“ The idea that we can detain people because we find them to be suspicious and we think they might commit a crime , that crosses a dangerous line , ” Rebecca DiLoreto , who lobbies in Frankfort for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
“ Now , unfortunately , it has been known to happen .
Sometimes it ’ s in a mostly white community where someone spots a black person walking down the street and they get suspicious and call police.
” “ The ‘ crime ’ in this case is basically that you ’ re here and we don ’ t think , from looking at you , that you should be here , ” she added .
“ The potential for abuse in that seems obvious.
” DiLoreta also pointed out the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ essentially kidnap anyone they want for hours and keep it off the record .
Nobody ever should be taken into police custody without a record being made of it , she said .
“ That ’ s starting to approach what you see in a police state or Soviet Russia , ” DiLoreta said .

New Bill To Allow Cops To Detain Citizens, Force Them To Explain Who They Are & What They’re Doing
Kentucky — An ominous bill that is currently making its way through the Kentucky Senate aims to give police unprecedented unconstitutional powers. These new powers will allow cops to stop anyone they want and demand that person tell them who they are, where they are going, and explain their actions. Naturally, it has civil rights advocates up in arms, but it doesn’t seem to be slowing down the bill’s momentum.
Police merely need to make an unsubstantiated claim that a person is involved in criminal activity which gives them free reign to stop that person, demand his name, home address and age — as well as ask to see his driver’s license, if he has one — and tell him to explain what he is presently doing “to the satisfaction of the officer.”
If you invoke your constitutional right not to answer the officer’s questions, this new bill grants cops the right to detain you for two hours. Even more ominous is the fact that this detainment is not considered an arrest so you have no right to an attorney and police don’t even have to record it. This non-arrest grey area detention will undoubtedly be rife for abuse.
Nevertheless, advocates for the police state tyranny say cops must have this new ability—to keep us safe. As Kentucky.com reports, Sen. Stephen Meredith, R-Leitchfield, said Grayson County law enforcement officials asked him for the bill after a number of local incidents showed the need for it.
“If a man acts suspicious, then why wouldn’t you want to know what his name is?” Meredith said in an interview. “I can’t imagine any legitimate reason in the world why a person would refuse to give their name and photo identification to a police officer if they were asked.”
In other words, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear…or, in other words, submit to the police state. Wrong!
Well Sen. Meredith, we’d like to educate you in why a person would refuse to talk to police—because it is our right not to! Legislation like this is straight out of the playbook of every tyranny in history. Remember “Ihre Papiere, Bitte”?
That phrase often brought shudders to the people who heard it in the 1930s and ’40s. It is German for “Your papers, please,” and this bill is nearly identical to that sinister Nazi policy.
Critics of the bill are pointing out its obvious unconstitutional nature and note out how cops can already go after people if they suspect them of committing a crime. As Kentucky.com reports:
Critics say Meredith’s bill would violate the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure and the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination. Police officers already have the right to approach people on the street and ask their names, but it’s established that citizens can refuse to respond, said Aaron Tucek, a legal fellow at the ACLU of Kentucky. If police can show reasonable suspicion that someone is carrying a deadly weapon, they can proceed to frisk that person, Tucek said. But they cannot detain people simply for not identifying themselves or explaining their activities “to the satisfaction of the officer,” Tucek said.
“The whole section of the bill on detention — they can call it whatever they want, but Supreme Court case law is pretty clear that an arrest is not determined by whether you call it an arrest, it’s determined by the restraint you place on someone’s liberty,” Tucek said. “If you put someone in the back of a police car or if you take them down to the police station or if you otherwise refuse to let them go their own way, that’s an arrest, and in our country, you cannot do that without probable cause.”
We agree and so does the constitution.
“The idea that we can detain people because we find them to be suspicious and we think they might commit a crime, that crosses a dangerous line,” Rebecca DiLoreto, who lobbies in Frankfort for the Kentucky Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said. “Now, unfortunately, it has been known to happen. Sometimes it’s in a mostly white community where someone spots a black person walking down the street and they get suspicious and call police.”
“The ‘crime’ in this case is basically that you’re here and we don’t think, from looking at you, that you should be here,” she added. “The potential for abuse in that seems obvious.”
DiLoreta also pointed out the menacing nature of cops being able to essentially kidnap anyone they want for hours and keep it off the record. Nobody ever should be taken into police custody without a record being made of it, she said.
“That’s starting to approach what you see in a police state or Soviet Russia,” DiLoreta said.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-20--Pennsylvania:  Pedophile Cop Gets 12 Years For Running Horrific Child Porn Network That Included Inf

Pennsylvania:  Pedophile Cop Gets 12 Years For Running Horrific Child Porn Network That Included Infants

Souderton , PA — A former Army veteran and police officer was convicted on multiple counts for being a distributor and possessing over 4,000 images of the most disturbing child pornography .
Matthew Laver , 38 , of Souderton , PA was violating the laws he was sworn to uphold while taking a paycheck as a law enforcement officer .
On Thursday , this disgusting villain was sentenced to 12 years in prison .
While it may not seem like a very long sentence , it is a significant amount of time considering most cops in his position do little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is an appalling case , ” U.S. Attorney William McSwain said in a statement .
“ The defendant was a member of a law enforcement organization charged with enforcing the law and protecting the public , but he was actually a child predator.
” Even though Laver had quit the police force in Montgomery County three years before being arrested and convicted , prosecutors were quick to point out his addiction to kiddie porn dated back to his time in the Army and throughout his service as a law enforcement officer .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ located on his phone , his external hard drive as well as his computer .
According to the Philadelphia Inquirer , Assistant U.S. Attorney Eileen Castillo Zelek stated in court filings : Some of those children were infants who were sexually exploited on film for Laver ’ s pleasure and distribution .
It ’ s unclear at this point to whom the former soldier and police officer was sharing his horrific content .
First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams stated : The prosecution is a result of the collaborative work of many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Childhood .
Marlon V. Miller , Special Agent in charge of HSI Philadelphia said : While he was a police officer , Laver spent 10 years online disseminating his collection of horrifying child porn which depicted sexual assault and rape of children as young as infants .
According to MDJonline : Laver also admitted to investigators he had engaged in masturbation while watching child porn .
He originally faced a minimum five-year sentence plus an additional 15 years in prison and ended up getting just over half of it .
While a police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of child porn may seem shocking , the fact is that it happens all the time within the government .
As TFTP reported in July , the problem of government agents viewing horrific images and videos of child pornography on official Department of Defense computers has gotten so out of hand that bipartisan legislation has been introduced to curb the practice .
Reps. Abigail Spanberger ( D-Va. ) and Mark Meadows ( R-N.C. ) introduced legislation meant to halt the epidemic of government employees viewing and sharing child porn over DOD networks and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Hill , the End National Defense Network Abuse ( END Network Abuse ) was introduced in the wake of in an investigation called “ Project Flicker ” carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement .
This investigation identified over 5,000 individuals , including many affiliated with DOD , who were subscribed to child porn websites .
The investigation was conducted by the Pentagon ’ s Defense Criminal Investigative Service and it netted hundreds of suspects who work for and are affiliated with the DOD .
Let that sink in .
Hundreds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ official DOD networks and computers to view and share child pornography — essentially running a child porn network on a government system .
The epidemic of child pornography has gotten so out of control that these people now feel comfortable enough to use official computers and networks — they know are being monitored , but apparently know they won ’ t get in trouble — to access and share this horrifying content .

Souderton, PA — A former Army veteran and police officer was convicted on multiple counts for being a distributor and possessing over 4,000 images of the most disturbing child pornography. Matthew Laver, 38, of Souderton, PA was violating the laws he was sworn to uphold while taking a paycheck as a law enforcement officer. On Thursday, this disgusting villain was sentenced to 12 years in prison. While it may not seem like a very long sentence, it is a significant amount of time considering most cops in his position do little to no time behind bars.
“This is an appalling case,” U.S. Attorney William McSwain said in a statement. “The defendant was a member of a law enforcement organization charged with enforcing the law and protecting the public, but he was actually a child predator.”
Even though Laver had quit the police force in Montgomery County three years before being arrested and convicted, prosecutors were quick to point out his addiction to kiddie porn dated back to his time in the Army and throughout his service as a law enforcement officer.
Laver’s child porn stash was located on his phone, his external hard drive as well as his computer. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Assistant U.S. Attorney Eileen Castillo Zelek stated in court filings:
While responsible for enforcing the law, Laver himself was flagrantly violating it, and preying upon the most vulnerable of victims — young children.
Some of those children were infants who were sexually exploited on film for Laver’s pleasure and distribution. It’s unclear at this point to whom the former soldier and police officer was sharing his horrific content. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams stated:
The harm caused by child exploitation is devastating and long-lasting, which is why we prosecute these cases aggressively…In this case, the conduct was particularly egregious because the defendant was a member of a law enforcement organization charged with enforcing the law. We stand ready with our federal and local partners to identify and prosecute all those who would prey upon minor children.
The prosecution is a result of the collaborative work of many agencies as a part of Project Safe Childhood. Marlon V. Miller, Special Agent in charge of HSI Philadelphia said:
Law enforcement officers take an oath to serve and protect, thus our conduct must be beyond reproach…Homeland Security Investigations special agents worked closely with our law enforcement partners to further prevent this perpetrator from victimizing children by distributing images of sexual assault.
While he was a police officer, Laver spent 10 years online disseminating his collection of horrifying child porn which depicted sexual assault and rape of children as young as infants. According to MDJonline:
The initial investigation of Laver began in September 2018 when Bucks County authorities shared information with Montgomery County detectives about child pornography allegedly being downloaded from a computer at Laver’s home. On July 30 into July 31, investigators using a file-sharing program connected to Laver’s computer and downloaded nine files containing child pornography, Beaghley alleged in the original criminal complaint. All of the files contained videos or images depicting children under 18 engaged in sexual acts or poses, according to the arrest affidavit.
Laver also admitted to investigators he had engaged in masturbation while watching child porn. He originally faced a minimum five-year sentence plus an additional 15 years in prison and ended up getting just over half of it.
While a police officer engaging in the viewing and dissemination of child porn may seem shocking, the fact is that it happens all the time within the government. As TFTP reported in July, the problem of government agents viewing horrific images and videos of child pornography on official Department of Defense computers has gotten so out of hand that bipartisan legislation has been introduced to curb the practice. Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.) and Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) introduced legislation meant to halt the epidemic of government employees viewing and sharing child porn over DOD networks and devices.
According to a report in the Hill, the End National Defense Network Abuse (END Network Abuse) was introduced in the wake of in an investigation called “Project Flicker” carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. This investigation identified over 5,000 individuals, including many affiliated with DOD, who were subscribed to child porn websites.
The investigation was conducted by the Pentagon’s Defense Criminal Investigative Service and it netted hundreds of suspects who work for and are affiliated with the DOD. Let that sink in. Hundreds of government employees are using taxpayer funded official DOD networks and computers to view and share child pornography — essentially running a child porn network on a government system.
The epidemic of child pornography has gotten so out of control that these people now feel comfortable enough to use official computers and networks — they know are being monitored, but apparently know they won’t get in trouble — to access and share this horrifying content.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-21--Infiltration Tactics & The Staged Dialectical Trap


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-21--Lobby Day 2020: The Tension Mounts & What To Expect

It ’ s Lobby Day in Virginia and the Sons Of Liberty are representing in Old Dominion .
We ’ @ @ @ @ @ history in the making .
However , with that in mind , Drew Nowlan of @ @ @ @ @ as we look at what we are expecting to take place and why .
Following @ @ @ @ @ ll be live streaming for several hours from the capitol in Richmond .
Support us @ @ @ @ @ Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty @ @ @ @ @ MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and @ @ @ @ @ to his `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty @ @ @ @ @ all trades , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied @ @ @ @ @ .
.
Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It @ @

It’s Lobby Day in Virginia and the Sons Of Liberty are representing in Old Dominion. We’re here to report on history in the making. However, with that in mind, Drew Nowlan of VictoriaTactical.com joins me this morning as we look at what we are expecting to take place and why. Following this episode, we’ll be live streaming for several hours from the capitol in Richmond.
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Support us monthly as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-21--Bombshell:  WHO Chief Scientist Caught On Video Contradicting Vaccine Propaganda

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan , M.D .
Chief Scientist of the World Health Organization , has been caught blatantly lying to the public about vaccine safety .
In a public service announcement produced by the W.H.O.
, she claims “ Vaccines are very safe ” and that vaccines can “ prevent disease without risks.
” But in a leaked W.H.O .
vaccine summit video that has now gone public , she frets about vaccine safety , saying , “ We really don ’ t have very good safety monitoring systems ” and , “ [ we ] learned about adverse events @ @ @ @ @ @ @ licensed and introduced into the population .
So I think that risk is always there… ” The blatant contradiction underscores the deliberate , outright lies that characterize the vaccine industry and its propagandists like Dr. Swaminathan .
It ’ s not simply that these people are providing the public false , misleading information about vaccines ; it ’ s that they are fully aware of their lies .
The very same people who publicly proclaim vaccines are “ risk-free ” are caught behind the scenes , just five days later , openly admitting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effects ) and failed public safety monitoring systems .
These globalist vaccine pushers are liars .
They are criminals against humanity .
They knowingly harm children with toxic vaccines that , in their own private meetings , they openly admit to each other are extremely risky .
This video , by the way , would be banned on YouTube , Facebook , and Vimeo .
Fortunately , we built Brighteon.com so that we could host these videos without being molested by the tech giants .
h/t to Del Bigtree and his HighWire broadcast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ full transcript is posted below : Dr. Soumya Swaminathan , M.D.Chief Scientist , W.H.O.
, Pediatrician – Promotional Video , Nov 28 , 2019 Vaccines are very safe .
If someone gets sick after vaccination , it is usually either a coincidence and error in administering the vaccine or very rarely , a problem with the vaccine itself .
That ’ s why we have vaccine safety systems .
Robust vaccine safety systems allow health workers and experts to react immediately to any problems that may arise .
They can examine the problem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and then promptly address the problem .
W.H.O .
works closely with countries to make sure that vaccines can do what they do best : prevent disease without risks .
New vaccines against malaria , meningitis , and encephalitis in Asia and Africa are now being thoroughly monitored with support from W.H.O .
Vaccines are one of the safest tools we have to prevent disease and ensure a healthy future for all children .
I think we can not overemphasize the fact that we really don ’ t have very good safety monitoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we ’ re not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to particular vaccine , and this always gets blown up in the media .
One should be able to give a very factual account of what exactly has happened and what the cause of deaths are .
But in most cases , there ’ s some obfuscation at that level and therefore , there ’ s less and less trust then in the system .
Putting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re cohort studies or whether they ’ re Sentinel Surveillance sites , to be able to monitor what ’ s going on and report back and then for corrective action to be taken because unexpected things could arise after introduction .
And one always has to be prepared as we ’ ve seen , you know , in the history of many drugs you ’ ve heard about– I mean , learned about adverse events only after the drug ’ s been licensed and introduced into the population .
So I think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population needs to understand that and feel confident that mechanisms are being put in place to study some of those things .
Stay informed .
Read Vaccines.news and watch vaccine truth videos on Brighteon.com ( or post your own ) .
Also , listen to my podcast that summarizes the total criminality and villainous deception of the entire vaccine industry ( and all its propagandists ) :

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, M.D. Chief Scientist of the World Health Organization, has been caught blatantly lying to the public about vaccine safety. In a public service announcement produced by the W.H.O., she claims “Vaccines are very safe” and that vaccines can “prevent disease without risks.” But in a leaked W.H.O. vaccine summit video that has now gone public, she frets about vaccine safety, saying, “We really don’t have very good safety monitoring systems” and, “[we] learned about adverse events only after the drug’s been licensed and introduced into the population. So I think that risk is always there…”
The blatant contradiction underscores the deliberate, outright lies that characterize the vaccine industry and its propagandists like Dr. Swaminathan. It’s not simply that these people are providing the public false, misleading information about vaccines; it’s that they are fully aware of their lies.
The very same people who publicly proclaim vaccines are “risk-free” are caught behind the scenes, just five days later, openly admitting to all the adverse effects (side effects) and failed public safety monitoring systems.
These globalist vaccine pushers are liars. They are criminals against humanity. They knowingly harm children with toxic vaccines that, in their own private meetings, they openly admit to each other are extremely risky.
This video, by the way, would be banned on YouTube, Facebook, and Vimeo. Fortunately, we built Brighteon.com so that we could host these videos without being molested by the tech giants. h/t to Del Bigtree and his HighWire broadcast, which
Watch and share. The full transcript is posted below:
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, M.D.Chief Scientist, W.H.O., Pediatrician – Promotional Video, Nov 28, 2019
Vaccines are very safe. If someone gets sick after vaccination, it is usually either a coincidence and error in administering the vaccine or very rarely, a problem with the vaccine itself. That’s why we have vaccine safety systems. Robust vaccine safety systems allow health workers and experts to react immediately to any problems that may arise. They can examine the problem rigorously and scientifically look at the data and then promptly address the problem. W.H.O. works closely with countries to make sure that vaccines can do what they do best: prevent disease without risks. New vaccines against malaria, meningitis, and encephalitis in Asia and Africa are now being thoroughly monitored with support from W.H.O. Vaccines are one of the safest tools we have to prevent disease and ensure a healthy future for all children.
Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, M.D.Chief Scientist, W.H.O., Pediatrician – W.H.O. Global Vaccine Safety Summit, Dec 3, 2019
I think we cannot overemphasize the fact that we really don’t have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries and this adds to the miscommunication and the misapprehensions because we’re not able to give clear-cut answers when people ask questions about the deaths that have occurred due to particular vaccine, and this always gets blown up in the media. One should be able to give a very factual account of what exactly has happened and what the cause of deaths are. But in most cases, there’s some obfuscation at that level and therefore, there’s less and less trust then in the system. Putting in place the mechanisms, whether they’re cohort studies or whether they’re Sentinel Surveillance sites, to be able to monitor what’s going on and report back and then for corrective action to be taken because unexpected things could arise after introduction. And one always has to be prepared as we’ve seen, you know, in the history of many drugs you’ve heard about– I mean, learned about adverse events only after the drug’s been licensed and introduced into the population. So I think that risk is always there and the population needs to understand that and feel confident that mechanisms are being put in place to study some of those things.
Stay informed. Read Vaccines.news and watch vaccine truth videos on Brighteon.com (or post your own).
Also, listen to my podcast that summarizes the total criminality and villainous deception of the entire vaccine industry (and all its propagandists):


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-21--Family Sues After DEA & TSA Steal $82,000+ From 79-Year-Old Pittsburgh Man With No Charges – His Ent

Family Sues After DEA & TSA Steal $ 82,000+ From 79-Year-Old Pittsburgh Man With No Charges – His Entire Life Savings The TSA is criminal in so many ways .
When they aren ’ t groping someone , they are robbing them blind .
Seriously , if a criminal wants to smuggle over $ 80,000 and keep it hidden , they tend not to use a Tupperware container .
Same goes for the DEA .
Why would anyone be carrying money in a Tupperware container if they were dealing drugs ?
This story is an embarrassment to both The TSA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from The Daily Mail : A Pennsylvania man who kept his entire life savings in a Tupperware container is suing the federal government after the money – $ 82,373 in cash – was seized at an airport after DEA agents deemed it ‘ suspicious ’ .
Terrence Rolin , 79 , and his daughter Rebecca Brown are the lead plaintiffs in a federal class action lawsuit filed Wednesday by the Institute for Justice which accuses the Drug Enforcement Administration and Transportation Security Administration of ‘ treating American citizens like criminals ’ by seizing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without evidence of an underlying crime .
Brown was visiting her father in Pittsburgh in August when he asked her to put his cash in a joint checking account .
She was flying back home to Boston to do that when TSA and DEA agents at Pittsburgh International Airport noticed the large sum of cash and began questioning her .
Brown said she had checked the TSA website beforehand to confirm that she could fly with that amount of money , and the site didn ’ t say that anything would prohibit her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked Brown to put her father on the phone so he could verify her story about where the cash came from , but Rolin , who is suffering mental decline , was unable to verify some of the details , she said .
‘ He just handed me the phone and said : “ Your stories don ’ t match .
We ’ re seizing the cash , ” ‘ Brown recalled .
The DEA notified Brown that it was seeking to permanently forfeit Rolin ’ s life savings – leaving the retired @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work or repairs to his truck , his primary means of transportation .
‘ My father and his parents worked hard for this money , and the government shouldn ’ t be able to reach into his pocket and take it , ’ Brown said a press release announcing the lawsuit .
‘ We did nothing wrong and haven ’ t been charged with any crime , yet the DEA is trying to take my father ’ s life savings .
His savings should be returned right away , and the government should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing something completely legal.
’ The Institute for Justice , a Virginia-based public interest law firm , charges that Brown and Rolin ’ s predicament is not uncommon as the DEA has a history of abusing a practice called civil asset forfeiture , which allows authorities to seize cash and property suspected of being connected to criminal activity , even if the owner is not charged with a crime .
The lawsuit argues that the DEA ’ s apparent policy of seizing money from travelers without probable cause when it exceeds $ 5,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You don ’ t forfeit your constitutional rights when you try to board an airplane .
It is time for TSA and federal law enforcement to stop seizing cash from travelers simply because the government considers certain amounts of cash “ suspicious , ” ‘ Dan Alban , a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice , said in the press release .
‘ We are trying to bring about institutional change and fix this terribly broken civil forfeiture system.
’ Read more at The Daily Mail… What the hell is going on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seized money and , despite NO CRIMINAL CHARGES , are simply trying to keep it .
Unfortunately , it happens too often .
• Civil Asset Forfeiture Out of Control : Government Robs Restaurant Owner for $ 33,000 • Another Criminal Example of Civil Asset Forfeiture : $ 40,977 Seized and NO CHARGES FILED • Worse than Criminals — Cops Use Asset Forfeiture to Steal $ 53K from an Orphanage and a Church Civil Asset Forfeiture is just another name for legalized theft .
This is not justice .
Please pray that Terrence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I hope the judge awards damages that allows Rollin to retire in style .

Family Sues After DEA & TSA Steal $82,000+ From 79-Year-Old Pittsburgh Man With No Charges – His Entire Life Savings
The TSA is criminal in so many ways.
When they aren’t groping someone, they are robbing them blind.
Seriously, if a criminal wants to smuggle over $80,000 and keep it hidden, they tend not to use a Tupperware container.
Same goes for the DEA.
Why would anyone be carrying money in a Tupperware container if they were dealing drugs?
This story is an embarrassment to both The TSA and DEA.
Here’s more from The Daily Mail:
A Pennsylvania man who kept his entire life savings in a Tupperware container is suing the federal government after the money – $82,373 in cash – was seized at an airport after DEA agents deemed it ‘suspicious’.
Terrence Rolin, 79, and his daughter Rebecca Brown are the lead plaintiffs in a federal class action lawsuit filed Wednesday by the Institute for Justice which accuses the Drug Enforcement Administration and Transportation Security Administration of ‘treating American citizens like criminals’ by seizing large amounts of cash from airline passengers without evidence of an underlying crime.
Brown was visiting her father in Pittsburgh in August when he asked her to put his cash in a joint checking account.
She was flying back home to Boston to do that when TSA and DEA agents at Pittsburgh International Airport noticed the large sum of cash and began questioning her.
Brown said she had checked the TSA website beforehand to confirm that she could fly with that amount of money, and the site didn’t say that anything would prohibit her from doing so.
A DEA agent asked Brown to put her father on the phone so he could verify her story about where the cash came from, but Rolin, who is suffering mental decline, was unable to verify some of the details, she said.
‘He just handed me the phone and said: “Your stories don’t match. We’re seizing the cash,”‘ Brown recalled.
The DEA notified Brown that it was seeking to permanently forfeit Rolin’s life savings – leaving the retired railroad engineer unable to pay for dental work or repairs to his truck, his primary means of transportation.
‘My father and his parents worked hard for this money, and the government shouldn’t be able to reach into his pocket and take it,’ Brown said a press release announcing the lawsuit.
‘We did nothing wrong and haven’t been charged with any crime, yet the DEA is trying to take my father’s life savings. His savings should be returned right away, and the government should stop taking money from Americans who are doing something completely legal.’
…
The Institute for Justice, a Virginia-based public interest law firm, charges that Brown and Rolin’s predicament is not uncommon as the DEA has a history of abusing a practice called civil asset forfeiture, which allows authorities to seize cash and property suspected of being connected to criminal activity, even if the owner is not charged with a crime.
The lawsuit argues that the DEA’s apparent policy of seizing money from travelers without probable cause when it exceeds $5,000 violates their Fourth Amendment rights.
‘You don’t forfeit your constitutional rights when you try to board an airplane. It is time for TSA and federal law enforcement to stop seizing cash from travelers simply because the government considers certain amounts of cash “suspicious,”‘ Dan Alban, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, said in the press release.
‘We are trying to bring about institutional change and fix this terribly broken civil forfeiture system.’
Read more at The Daily Mail…
#####
What the hell is going on here America?
The DEA and TSA seized money and, despite NO CRIMINAL CHARGES, are simply trying to keep it.
Unfortunately, it happens too often.
Civil Asset Forfeiture is just another name for legalized theft.
This is not justice.
This is government-sponsored theft!
Please pray that Terrence Rollin gets justice with his lawsuit.
I hope the judge awards damages that allows Rollin to retire in style.
Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-21--Florida:  Your Republican State Senators Just Sold You Out On Gun Rights

Florida : Your Republican State Senators Just Sold You Out On Gun Rights Following a win earlier this month by Florida Carry in a lawsuit against Broward County ’ s illegal gun laws , Florida Republican state senators sold the people ’ s gun rights out , making them just as treasonous against the people as their alleged political opposition .
Senate President Bill Galvano picked a fight with Floridians who believe in the constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms .
It is well known — even by the media — that in 2018 Bill Galvano orchestrated the creation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Control Bill.
” And , of course , it didn ’ t stop gun crime or criminals .
It only took away the rights of law-abiding people .
So now , he ’ s back for more gun control and it appears likely that Bloomberg ’ s $ 500,000.00 “ donation ” to Senate President Bill Galvano is behind yet another Galvano gun control bill .
— SB-7028 — an admitted priority of Galvano .
All but one of the Republican Senators on the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee put Galvano ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , their Oath of Office and YOU , their constituents and voted for a gun control bill .
GITN added that “ House Speaker Jose Oliva and Governor Ron DeSantis are pushing back against this massive gun control bill.
” The report went on to state : SB-7028 by the Committee on Infrastructure & Security is a gun control bill .
Among other things , it contains a massive two-pronged Universal Background Check system that is the worst I have ever seen .
It is clearly meant to simply ban all private sales @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This bill contains so much red tape and nonsense that there is almost no way a law-abiding person could comply .
The only thing we know for sure is that this bill will only stop law-abiding people from exercising a constitutional right and it will be completely ignored by criminals .
Additionally , Five Republican Senators approved this bill , as it was unanimously passed in the panel .
reported : Over the objections of the National Rifle Association , a Senate panel Monday unanimously signed off on a far-reaching measure that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” create a record-keeping system for private gun sales and set aside $ 5 million to establish a “ statewide strategy for violence prevention.
” The proposal ( SB 7028 ) is a priority of Senate President Bill Galvano , R-Bradenton , as evidenced by the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee ’ s consideration and passage of the measure the day before the 2020 legislative session begins .
The sweeping legislation would require background checks and a three-day waiting period for firearms sold “ on property to which the public has the right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a flea market , a gun show , or a firearm exhibit.
” The measure would also mandate that guns be securely stored in households and other places where minors under age 18 — up from the current threshold of 16 — could have access to the weapons .
The bill also would create a new section of law that would require guns to be stored to prevent access “ by a person of unsound mind.
” And the proposal would impose new requirements for private gun sales .
Under the measure , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be required to fill out a form that would include the name , date of birth and identification information of the purchaser .
The affidavit , which would include background questions aimed at ensuring the purchaser is eligible to buy a gun , would have to be notarized .
Five Republican Senators approved this bill , as it was unanimously passed in the panel .
I think Floridians need their own Lobby Day and tens of thousands of people should be turning out to call out the tyrants , both Republicans and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the people ’ s rights under the guise and lies of “ safety and security.
” There ’ s a lot of house cleaning to go around in each and every state in our union when it comes to these representatives who take an oath to uphold the Constitution and preserve the rights of the people and immediately abandon that oath once they are in office .
The end goal in all of this is a global disarmament , and the only people standing in the way of that are Americans .
Article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Media

Florida: Your Republican State Senators Just Sold You Out On Gun Rights
Following a win earlier this month by Florida Carry in a lawsuit against Broward County’s illegal gun laws, Florida Republican state senators sold the people’s gun rights out, making them just as treasonous against the people as their alleged political opposition.
Guns In The News reports:
Senate President Bill Galvano picked a fight with Floridians who believe in the constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms. It is well known — even by the media — that in 2018 Bill Galvano orchestrated the creation and passage of the “Parkland Gun Control Bill.” And, of course, it didn’t stop gun crime or criminals. It only took away the rights of law-abiding people.
So now, he’s back for more gun control and it appears likely that Bloomberg’s $500,000.00 “donation” to Senate President Bill Galvano is behind yet another Galvano gun control bill. — SB-7028 — an admitted priority of Galvano.
All but one of the Republican Senators on the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee put Galvano’s wishes ahead of principle, the Constitution, their Oath of Office and YOU, their constituents and voted for a gun control bill.
GITN added that “House Speaker Jose Oliva and Governor Ron DeSantis are pushing back against this massive gun control bill.”
The report went on to state:
SB-7028 by the Committee on Infrastructure & Security is a gun control bill. Among other things, it contains a massive two-pronged Universal Background Check system that is the worst I have ever seen.
It is clearly meant to simply ban all private sales of firearms through red tape and fear.
This bill contains so much red tape and nonsense that there is almost no way a law-abiding person could comply.
The only thing we know for sure is that this bill will only stop law-abiding people from exercising a constitutional right and it will be completely ignored by criminals.
Additionally, Five Republican Senators approved this bill, as it was unanimously passed in the panel. reported:
Over the objections of the National Rifle Association, a Senate panel Monday unanimously signed off on a far-reaching measure that would close the gun-show “loophole,” create a record-keeping system for private gun sales and set aside $5 million to establish a “statewide strategy for violence prevention.”
The proposal (SB 7028) is a priority of Senate President Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, as evidenced by the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee’s consideration and passage of the measure the day before the 2020 legislative session begins.
The sweeping legislation would require background checks and a three-day waiting period for firearms sold “on property to which the public has the right of access,” such as “a flea market, a gun show, or a firearm exhibit.”
The measure would also mandate that guns be securely stored in households and other places where minors under age 18 — up from the current threshold of 16 — could have access to the weapons.
The bill also would create a new section of law that would require guns to be stored to prevent access “by a person of unsound mind.”
And the proposal would impose new requirements for private gun sales. Under the measure, individuals who sell guns to other people would be required to fill out a form that would include the name, date of birth and identification information of the purchaser. The affidavit, which would include background questions aimed at ensuring the purchaser is eligible to buy a gun, would have to be notarized.
Five Republican Senators approved this bill, as it was unanimously passed in the panel.
I think Floridians need their own Lobby Day and tens of thousands of people should be turning out to call out the tyrants, both Republicans and Democrats who are supporting the infringement of the people’s rights under the guise and lies of “safety and security.”
There’s a lot of house cleaning to go around in each and every state in our union when it comes to these representatives who take an oath to uphold the Constitution and preserve the rights of the people and immediately abandon that oath once they are in office.
The end goal in all of this is a global disarmament, and the only people standing in the way of that are Americans.
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-21--Pelosi Indicates Allegations, Not Facts, Enough For Impeachment

How many times have we in America heard the phrase “ innocent until proven guilty ” ?
Watch some police reality TV shows and it ’ s always mentioned either in writing across the screen or by the narrator .
But , do Americans know where that phrase originates ?
It comes from the text of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America .
It sounds pretty simple – innocent until proven guilty , right to remain silent , no double jeopardy , no depriving one of life , liberty or property without due process @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for public use without compensation .
Yet , this is not how the uneducated , illiterate individuals in the federal government see it or want it .
Last fall , Barack Obama CIA Director John Brennan announced a new legal standard for American jurisprudence .
He said Americans are innocent until they are accused of a crime .
Now , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has posed another new standard .
“ It ’ s not a question of proof , it says what allegations have been made and that has to be subjected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forward , but it should not be ignored in the context of other events that could substantiate some of that , ” Pelosi told reporters Thursday .
Do you see what is happening America ?
Brennan and Pelosi arbitrarily , on their own , without any thought to natural rights , decided that individuals are only innocent until being accuses of a crime or having allegations of wrongdoing be brought against the individual .
No authority is given those two to abolish a right on a whim .
This is despotism and tyranny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brennan started this in October of 2019 when he appeared on MSNBC ’ s “ Morning Joe ” saying , “ people are innocent , you know , until alleged to be involved in some kind of criminal activity ” .
Brennan ’ s statement , being absolutely wrong and in conflict with the Fifth Amendment , told the American people that the government considers you guilty upon being “ alleged ” to be involved in criminal activity .
Can you see what this sets up in America ?
If you are “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or be involved in any criminal activity , you are guilty – no trial , no jury , and no judge .
Doesn ’ t this set up the perfect storm for corralling people into FEMA internment camps ?
Moreover , isn ’ t is more than coincidental this occurred during the Obama administration ’ s spying operation on the Trump campaign , the election of Trump as president , and the indication of impeachment proceedings should Trump be elected president ?
Glenn Greenwald , the reporter who helped Edward Snowden expose the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feature writer at ZeroHedge , tweeted a response to Brennan and ZeroHedge explained how this would unfold .
With sincere apologies in advance to all US liberals who are offended by criticisms of former CIA chiefs , @ JohnBrennan ‘ s understanding of the presumption of innocence is completely warped , but in the most unsurprising way imaginable : pic.twitter.com/IsE8ulSJMo Greenwald wrote , “ With sincere apologies in advance to all U.S. liberals who are offended by criticisms of former CIA chiefs , @ JohnBrennan ’ s understanding of the presumption of innocence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most unsurprising way imaginable.
” Zerohedge explained : “ The presumption of innocence , as a foundation of the U.S. judicial system , has seemingly been under attack since November 8th 2016 .
An allegation is made , media runs with the narrative , the seed of possibility of guilt is implanted in the minds of zombie Americans , and the accused is maligned forever – no court required .
Simple .
And now , none other than former CIA Director John Brennan clarifies exactly how the deep state sees ‘ due process @ @ @ @ @ @ @ John Brennan now holds a position at CNN providing commentary and has accused Trump of treason .
The anti-constitutionalists want everything “ tried ” in the “ court of public opinion ” instead of through a court of law .
Without any proof of the commission of a crime and only “ allegations ” being thrown around , a court of law would not touch it with a ten foot pole ; but , the ignorant , stupid public will lap it up faster than a dog eating a steak , taking every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As ZeroHedge indicated , the accused is maligned forever .
Think about how many individuals in the “ In ” justice system heard that .
How many police officers heard that ?
Many police officers are “ do what I ’ m told ” brown-shirt followers of the authority of man that they would absolutely love for this to pass muster , meaning no one holds them accountable to the Fifth Amendment .
Forget the Miranda law .
Your rights were stripped away with the vile rhetoric of Nancy Pelosi and John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all know that rights come from God , not government .
And , despite what someone in government says , gets passed in the legislature or orders that eradicate rights , those rights are still there but won ’ t be recognized , guaranteed or protected by government .
It would be the opposite – trample , abuse , and negate the natural rights bestowed upon man by God .
This is exactly why the framers indicated that freedom can only be maintained when the public is armed and vigilant .
Without the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from government overreach , one is at the mercy of tyrants and despots .
The ability to keep and bear arms is the force needed to maintain all other natural rights .
Seeing Pelosi say this during the sham of impeachment signals she is willing to use unfounded allegations to remove Trump from office .
The Constitution should be upheld , and impeachment proceedings used when office holders commit crimes , misdemeanors and treason while in office .
But , impeachment is required to be made on facts , not fiction .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was Hussein Soetoro for engaging in treason and other transgressions .
Congress , holding a Republican majority , did not because John Boehner did not believe in impeachment .
It is further proof that both unconstitutional parties work in conjunction with one another to amass more power concentrated in the federal government and exercise control over the people .
We can all name the reason why this is being done and has to be done as soon as possible .
Don ’ t misunderstand that this implies Trump has not committed impeachable offenses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat majority House is not impeaching him for those .
He is being impeached on false allegations in a dog and pony government theater show and tried in the court of public opinion .
In fact , every individual in the District of Corruption and Criminals has committed impeachable offenses .
One can bet that should impeachment proceedings be brought against them , they would expect the full protection of the tenets of the Constitution recognized and guaranteed in the Bill of Rights .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

How many times have we in America heard the phrase “innocent until proven guilty”? Watch some police reality TV shows and it’s always mentioned either in writing across the screen or by the narrator. But, do Americans know where that phrase originates? It comes from the text of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise, infamous crime, unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation – Fifth Amendment, Constitution for the united States of America. [Emphasis Mine]
It sounds pretty simple – innocent until proven guilty, right to remain silent, no double jeopardy, no depriving one of life, liberty or property without due process, and no confiscation of private property for public use without compensation. Yet, this is not how the uneducated, illiterate individuals in the federal government see it or want it.
WND has the story.
Last fall, Barack Obama CIA Director John Brennan announced a new legal standard for American jurisprudence.
He said Americans are innocent until they are accused of a crime.
Now, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has posed another new standard.
It’s not about “proof” anymore.
It’s about “allegations.”
Watch Pelosi say it.
“It’s not a question of proof, it says what allegations have been made and that has to be subjected to scrutiny as to how we go forward, but it should not be ignored in the context of other events that could substantiate some of that,” Pelosi told reporters Thursday.
Do you see what is happening America? Brennan and Pelosi arbitrarily, on their own, without any thought to natural rights, decided that individuals are only innocent until being accuses of a crime or having allegations of wrongdoing be brought against the individual. No authority is given those two to abolish a right on a whim. This is despotism and tyranny at its most subtle.
The Muslim Brennan started this in October of 2019 when he appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” saying, “people are innocent, you know, until alleged to be involved in some kind of criminal activity”.
Brennan’s statement, being absolutely wrong and in conflict with the Fifth Amendment, told the American people that the government considers you guilty upon being “alleged” to be involved in criminal activity. Can you see what this sets up in America? If you are “alleged” to have committed a crime or be involved in any criminal activity, you are guilty – no trial, no jury, and no judge. Doesn’t this set up the perfect storm for corralling people into FEMA internment camps? Moreover, isn’t is more than coincidental this occurred during the Obama administration’s spying operation on the Trump campaign, the election of Trump as president, and the indication of impeachment proceedings should Trump be elected president?
Glenn Greenwald, the reporter who helped Edward Snowden expose the spying crimes of the US government and feature writer at ZeroHedge, tweeted a response to Brennan and ZeroHedge explained how this would unfold.
With sincere apologies in advance to all US liberals who are offended by criticisms of former CIA chiefs, @JohnBrennan‘s understanding of the presumption of innocence is completely warped, but in the most unsurprising way imaginable: pic.twitter.com/IsE8ulSJMo
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 6, 2019
With sincere apologies in advance to all US liberals who are offended by criticisms of former CIA chiefs, @JohnBrennan's understanding of the presumption of innocence is completely warped, but in the most unsurprising way imaginable: pic.twitter.com/IsE8ulSJMo — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) October 6, 2019
Zerohedge featured journalist Glenn Greenwald’s Twitter post on Brennan’s statement.
Greenwald wrote, “With sincere apologies in advance to all U.S. liberals who are offended by criticisms of former CIA chiefs, @JohnBrennan’s understanding of the presumption of innocence is completely warped, but in the most unsurprising way imaginable.”
Zerohedge explained: “The presumption of innocence, as a foundation of the U.S. judicial system, has seemingly been under attack since November 8th 2016. An allegation is made, media runs with the narrative, the seed of possibility of guilt is implanted in the minds of zombie Americans, and the accused is maligned forever – no court required. Simple. And now, none other than former CIA Director John Brennan clarifies exactly how the deep state sees ‘due process’…” [Emphasis Mine]
John Brennan now holds a position at CNN providing commentary and has accused Trump of treason.
The anti-constitutionalists want everything “tried” in the “court of public opinion” instead of through a court of law. Without any proof of the commission of a crime and only “allegations” being thrown around, a court of law would not touch it with a ten foot pole; but, the ignorant, stupid public will lap it up faster than a dog eating a steak, taking every word spoken and every allegation as truth. As ZeroHedge indicated, the accused is maligned forever.
Think about how many individuals in the “In”justice system heard that. How many police officers heard that? Many police officers are “do what I’m told” brown-shirt followers of the authority of man that they would absolutely love for this to pass muster, meaning no one holds them accountable to the Fifth Amendment. Forget the Miranda law. Your rights were stripped away with the vile rhetoric of Nancy Pelosi and John Brennan.
By now, we should all know that rights come from God, not government. And, despite what someone in government says, gets passed in the legislature or orders that eradicate rights, those rights are still there but won’t be recognized, guaranteed or protected by government. It would be the opposite – trample, abuse, and negate the natural rights bestowed upon man by God.
This is exactly why the framers indicated that freedom can only be maintained when the public is armed and vigilant. Without the means to protect one’s self from government overreach, one is at the mercy of tyrants and despots. The ability to keep and bear arms is the force needed to maintain all other natural rights.
Seeing Pelosi say this during the sham of impeachment signals she is willing to use unfounded allegations to remove Trump from office. The Constitution should be upheld, and impeachment proceedings used when office holders commit crimes, misdemeanors and treason while in office. But, impeachment is required to be made on facts, not fiction. If anyone needed to be impeached, it was Hussein Soetoro for engaging in treason and other transgressions. Congress, holding a Republican majority, did not because John Boehner did not believe in impeachment. It is further proof that both unconstitutional parties work in conjunction with one another to amass more power concentrated in the federal government and exercise control over the people. We can all name the reason why this is being done and has to be done as soon as possible.
Don’t misunderstand that this implies Trump has not committed impeachable offenses; he has. But, the Democrat majority House is not impeaching him for those. He is being impeached on false allegations in a dog and pony government theater show and tried in the court of public opinion. In fact, every individual in the District of Corruption and Criminals has committed impeachable offenses. One can bet that should impeachment proceedings be brought against them, they would expect the full protection of the tenets of the Constitution recognized and guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media