thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-24--The Killing Of Breonna Taylor & The Lack Of Justice That Followed

The lack of indictments of police in the killing of Breonna Taylor , except for one officer and those charges were not even about her death , demonstrates that there appears to be one law for agents of the state and one law for the people they serve .
In this episode , we ’ ll take a look at what just happened in Kentucky and why it appears it will be a launching pad for more rioting and looting .
An update follows the original broadcast .
Thanks to those who provided additional information for which I corrected earlier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Broadcast & Arrest Of Kate Shemirani Numbers 35:9 And the LORD spake unto Moses , saying , 10 Speak unto the children of Israel , and say unto them , When ye be come over Jordan into the land of Canaan ; 11 Then ye shall appoint you cities to be cities of refuge for you ; that the slayer may flee thither , which killeth any person at unawares .
12 And they shall be unto you cities for refuge from the avenger ; that the manslayer die not , until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
13 And of these cities which ye shall give six cities shall ye have for refuge .
14 Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan , and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan , which shall be cities of refuge .
15 These six cities shall be a refuge , both for the children of Israel , and for the stranger , and for the sojourner among them : that every one that killeth any person unawares may flee thither .
16 And if he smite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so that he die , he is a murderer : the murderer shall surely be put to death .
17 And if he smite him with throwing a stone , wherewith he may die , and he die , he is a murderer : the murderer shall surely be put to death .
18 Or if he smite him with an hand weapon of wood , wherewith he may die , and he die , he is a murderer : the murderer shall surely be put to death .
19 The revenger of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when he meeteth him , he shall slay him .
20 But if he thrust him of hatred , or hurl at him by laying of wait , that he die ; 21 Or in enmity smite him with his hand , that he die : he that smote him shall surely be put to death ; for he is a murderer : the revenger of blood shall slay the murderer , when he meeteth him .
22 But if he thrust him suddenly without enmity , or have cast upon him any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Or with any stone , wherewith a man may die , seeing him not , and cast it upon him , that he die , and was not his enemy , neither sought his harm : 24 Then the congregation shall judge between the slayer and the revenger of blood according to these judgments : 25 And the congregation shall deliver the slayer out of the hand of the revenger of blood , and the congregation shall restore him to the city of his refuge , whither he was fled : and he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the high priest , which was anointed with the holy oil .
26 But if the slayer shall at any time come without the border of the city of his refuge , whither he was fled ; 27 And the revenger of blood find him without the borders of the city of his refuge , and the revenger of blood kill the slayer ; he shall not be guilty of blood : 28 Because he should have remained in the city of his refuge until the death of the high priest : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ priest the slayer shall return into the land of his possession .
29 So these things shall be for a statute of judgment unto you throughout your generations in all your dwellings .
30 Whoso killeth any person , the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses : but one witness shall not testify against any person to cause him to die .
31 Moreover ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer , which is guilty of death : but he shall be surely put @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge , that he should come again to dwell in the land , until the death of the priest .
33 So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are : for blood it defileth the land : and the land can not be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein , but by the blood of him that shed it .
34 Defile not therefore the land which ye shall inhabit , wherein I dwell : for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Israel .
Deuteronomy 4:41 Then Moses severed three cities on this side Jordan toward the sunrising ; 42 That the slayer might flee thither , which should kill his neighbour unawares , and hated him not in times past ; and that fleeing unto one of these cities he might live : 43 Namely , Bezer in the wilderness , in the plain country , of the Reubenites ; and Ramoth in Gilead , of the Gadites ; and Golan in Bashan , of the Manassites .
Exodus 21:12 He that smiteth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , shall be surely put to death .
13 And if a man lie not in wait , but God deliver him into his hand ; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee .
14 But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbour , to slay him with guile ; thou shalt take him from mine altar , that he may die .
15 And he that smiteth his father , or his mother , shall be surely put to death .
16 And he that stealeth a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if he be found in his hand , he shall surely be put to death .
17 And he that curseth his father , or his mother , shall surely be put to death .
18 And if men strive together , and one smite another with a stone , or with his fist , and he die not , but keepeth his bed : 19 If he rise again , and walk abroad upon his staff , then shall he that smote him be quit : only he shall pay for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cause him to be thoroughly healed .
20 And if a man smite his servant , or his maid , with a rod , and he die under his hand ; he shall be surely punished .
21 Notwithstanding , if he continue a day or two , he shall not be punished : for he is his money .
22 If men strive , and hurt a woman with child , so that her fruit depart from her , and yet no mischief follow : he shall be surely punished , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lay upon him ; and he shall pay as the judges determine .
23 And if any mischief follow , then thou shalt give life for life , 24 Eye for eye , tooth for tooth , hand for hand , foot for foot , 25 Burning for burning , wound for wound , stripe for stripe .
26 And if a man smite the eye of his servant , or the eye of his maid , that it perish ; he shall let him go free for his eye ’ s sake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his manservant ’ s tooth , or his maidservant ’ s tooth ; he shall let him go free for his tooth ’ s sake .
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

The lack of indictments of police in the killing of Breonna Taylor, except for one officer and those charges were not even about her death, demonstrates that there appears to be one law for agents of the state and one law for the people they serve. In this episode, we’ll take a look at what just happened in Kentucky and why it appears it will be a launching pad for more rioting and looting.
An update follows the original broadcast. Thanks to those who provided additional information for which I corrected earlier statements.
Update To This Morning’s Broadcast & Arrest Of Kate Shemirani
Scriptures referenced:
Numbers 35:9 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 10 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, When ye be come over Jordan into the land of Canaan; 11 Then ye shall appoint you cities to be cities of refuge for you; that the slayer may flee thither, which killeth any person at unawares. 12 And they shall be unto you cities for refuge from the avenger; that the manslayer die not, until he stand before the congregation in judgment. 13 And of these cities which ye shall give six cities shall ye have for refuge. 14 Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan, which shall be cities of refuge. 15 These six cities shall be a refuge, both for the children of Israel, and for the stranger, and for the sojourner among them: that every one that killeth any person unawares may flee thither.
16 And if he smite him with an instrument of iron, so that he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death. 17 And if he smite him with throwing a stone, wherewith he may die, and he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death. 18 Or if he smite him with an hand weapon of wood, wherewith he may die, and he die, he is a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death. 19 The revenger of blood himself shall slay the murderer: when he meeteth him, he shall slay him. 20 But if he thrust him of hatred, or hurl at him by laying of wait, that he die; 21 Or in enmity smite him with his hand, that he die: he that smote him shall surely be put to death; for he is a murderer: the revenger of blood shall slay the murderer, when he meeteth him.
22 But if he thrust him suddenly without enmity, or have cast upon him any thing without laying of wait, 23 Or with any stone, wherewith a man may die, seeing him not, and cast it upon him, that he die, and was not his enemy, neither sought his harm: 24 Then the congregation shall judge between the slayer and the revenger of blood according to these judgments: 25 And the congregation shall deliver the slayer out of the hand of the revenger of blood, and the congregation shall restore him to the city of his refuge, whither he was fled: and he shall abide in it unto the death of the high priest, which was anointed with the holy oil.
26 But if the slayer shall at any time come without the border of the city of his refuge, whither he was fled; 27 And the revenger of blood find him without the borders of the city of his refuge, and the revenger of blood kill the slayer; he shall not be guilty of blood: 28 Because he should have remained in the city of his refuge until the death of the high priest: but after the death of the high priest the slayer shall return into the land of his possession. 29 So these things shall be for a statute of judgment unto you throughout your generations in all your dwellings.
30 Whoso killeth any person, the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses: but one witness shall not testify against any person to cause him to die. 31 Moreover ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer, which is guilty of death: but he shall be surely put to death. 32 And ye shall take no satisfaction for him that is fled to the city of his refuge, that he should come again to dwell in the land, until the death of the priest.
33 So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it. 34 Defile not therefore the land which ye shall inhabit, wherein I dwell: for I the LORD dwell among the children of Israel.
Deuteronomy 4:41 Then Moses severed three cities on this side Jordan toward the sunrising; 42 That the slayer might flee thither, which should kill his neighbour unawares, and hated him not in times past; and that fleeing unto one of these cities he might live: 43 Namely, Bezer in the wilderness, in the plain country, of the Reubenites; and Ramoth in Gilead, of the Gadites; and Golan in Bashan, of the Manassites.
Exodus 21:12 He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death. 13 And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hand; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee. 14 But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbour, to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die.
15 And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death.
16 And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
17 And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death.
18 And if men strive together, and one smite another with a stone, or with his fist, and he die not, but keepeth his bed: 19 If he rise again, and walk abroad upon his staff, then shall he that smote him be quit: only he shall pay for the loss of his time, and shall cause him to be thoroughly healed.
20 And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. 21 Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money.
22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, 24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
26 And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye’s sake. 27 And if he smite out his manservant’s tooth, or his maidservant’s tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth’s sake.
Resources referenced:
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2020-09-23/grand-jury-to-present-report-in-breonna-taylors-death
https://www.foxnews.com/us/breonna-taylor-shooting-louisville-officer-indicted-on-criminal-charges
https://www.foxnews.com/us/photos-details-breonna-taylor-shot
A barrage of bullets. Crime scene photos from Breonna Taylor’s apartment, where she was murdered while sleeping in bed. Numerous bullet holes inside, and 16 shell casings outside the front door. pic.twitter.com/9qDhLdBlBR — Mike Sington (@MikeSington) September 5, 2020
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/63943132/breonna-taylor-summary-redacted1
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/23/us/breonna-taylor-timeline/index.html
https://www.thedailybeast.com/tucker-carlson-accuses-black-lives-matter-of-lying-about-breonna-taylors-death-gets-major-fact-wrong
https://www.wlky.com/article/watch-neighbor-shoots-video-of-kenneth-walker-s-arrest-breonna-taylor/33265935#
https://nypost.com/2020/09/23/kentucky-ag-breonna-taylor-cops-knocked-and-announced-themselves/
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-24--Physicians Association Issues White Paper Questioning Withholding Of Hydroxychloroquine For COVID-19

Physicians Association Issues White Paper Questioning Withholding Of Hydroxychloroquine For COVID-19, The Unproven Illness From Coronavirus

One has to ask one ’ s self daily , will the propaganda surrounding CON-VID-19 ever end ?
And , yes , we can call COVID-19 the CON-VID-19 because this “ illness ” is either contrived , a ruse , a confidence trick , or all of the above .
Considering that China first announced it , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) parroted the Chinese narrative , and Italy was hit hard early on due to its monetary dealings with China , there has not been one scientist or scientific publication that has reported the isolation of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Yet , here we all are in the united States dealing with “ forced house arrest ” , mask mandates , social distancing recommendations , and limited gatherings ( except for Antifa , BLM , etc .
riots ) , along with continually changing recommendations from organizations and “ infectious disease experts ” that have totally lost credibility .
While the CDC , the “ infectious disease experts ” , government officials , and the lamestream government-controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia ( LGCPEE ) continues to spout the number of “ over 200,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while the CDC ’ s own website touts the number of deaths from CON-VID-19 alone at 6 % , nations that have utilized the malaria drug Hydroxychloroquine have experienced 75 % less deaths from coronavirus .
Have you wondered why ?
You would not be alone ; a physicians ’ association is asking the same question .
With media solemnly spotlighting the passing of the 200,000 mark in deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the United States , a physicians association has a question .
“ Why is the death rate about 75 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Jane Orient , executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons .
The reference is to a country-based analysis updated Sept. 20 that shows a gap between countries that treat COVID-19 early or prophylactically with hydroxychloroquine and those that , like the U.S. , discourage or prohibit its use .
The answer to Orient ’ s question can be found in a white paper published by the Economic Standard this month titled “ Hydroxychloroquine and the Burden of Proof : An Urgent Call to Depoliticize Medicine in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Editor-in-Chief , Erik Sass , wrote : The COVID-19 pandemic struck America nine months before a presidential election , turning basic medical activities like testing and treatment into partisan battlegrounds .
No subject has been more distorted than hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) , a safe , versatile medicine that has treated hundreds of millions of people for numerous diseases for seven decades .
HCQ was adopted as a COVID-19 treatment in Asia in January 2020 without fanfare , based on lab tests with the related coronavirus SARS-1 .
But when President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would also begin studying the drug ’ s potential against the virus , political opponents defied longstanding scientific and medical consensus to portray HCQ as harmful and Trump as a mortal danger to public health .
Flawed and even falsified studies were published and promoted by media outlets eager to discredit Trump , while positive studies were impugned or ignored .
Sass went on to say this campaign against the use of Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) persists even with evidence of the benefit of use against COVID-19 growing , “ including scores of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administered early in disease progression.
” Hundreds of drugs have been approved for both indication-specific and general usage on the basis of similar observational trials , especially when conducted in large numbers and subject to careful meta-analysis .
As a matter of medical practice and especially in a pandemic emergency , it is flatly not the case that only randomized controlled trials can justify adopting a treatment , as HCQ detractors have insisted while publicizing randomized controlled trials results that are themselves deeply flawed .
The U.S. is an international outlier on HCQ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world are prescribing HCQ to treat COVID-19 outside of hospitals , as well as prophylactically to prevent infection among healthcare workers and vulnerable populations .
This paper argues that HCQ has met the appropriate burden of proof and urges members of the U.S. news media , public health community , and regulatory agencies to stop politicizing the use of this medicine .
Tens of thousand of lives still hang in the balance .
If there is such a thing as COVID-19 and there is an acceptable treatment for it , why are individuals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Redfield , and a host of others pushing a vaccine that is planned to be mandatory ?
Simple .
These individuals will profit handsomely from a vaccine , but would not from the treatment with readily available medications .
Remember , Dr. Carrie Modej referenced the Emergency Preparedness Act whereby vaccines can not be mandated or forced when there is an effective treatment regime or prevention for the particular illness the vaccine targets .
Scientists have not isolated the microorganism claimed to cause COVID-19 .
In fact , the scientific experiments have not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and can not meet Koch ’ s or Rivers ’ postulates .
So , what are we dealing with here ?
No one knows .
And someone knows if this is a nothing burger as well .
WND highlighted some lessons from this paper .
• None Flawed and even falsified studies were published and promoted by media outlets eager to discredit Trump , while positive studies were impugned or ignored .
• None HCQ is commonly prescribed for at least 25 indications in addition to malaria .
• None The drug ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the mid-range of 30 commonly used drugs .
• None Hundreds of drugs have been approved without randomized controlled trials , including the tetanus vaccine , insulin , tetracycline , warfarin , heparin , prednisone , Keflex and high-dose penicillin for neurosyphilis .
• None Only 8.5 % of the American Heart Association ’ s guidelines are supported by randomized controlled trials .
On page six of the white paper , there are scores of illnesses listed for which HCQ is effective and has potential for use – it ’ s not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the paper cites HCQ as a “ safe , well-tolerated drug.
” As WND pointed out , the drug does prolong the QT electrical interval of the heart ; however , it is within acceptable guidelines along with 30 other commonly used medications .
The problem has occurred with randomized clinical trials ( RCTs ) and observational trials .
Page twelve of this report discusses this and lists 24 drugs and treatments that were approved without RCTs .
So , why the problem with Hydroxycloroquine ?
Government regulatory agencies in the U.S. and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evidence to make inferences about causal outcomes .
The foundational method for such work was laid out in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill .
He identified nine “ aspects ” of causal reasoning evidence that in sum provide a rationale for deducing causation .
To this day the aspects identified by Hill remain the most widely used framework for general causal reasoning across medicine , science and law .
One of these aspects is “ experiment , ” which includes RCTs , but these comprise only a small component of causal evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that all forms of scientific evidence must be considered and weighed , with no single type considered solely definitive .
It ’ s particularly unrealistic to demand RCTs confirming HCQ ’ s efficacy against COVID-19 before using it for that purpose for a number of reasons .
Ethical considerations play a role , as some healthcare providers might refuse to carry out RCTs during a pandemic because it requires knowingly giving ill people a placebo or putatively less effective medication .
RCTs also face logistical challenges .
High-quality randomized studies require intensive preparation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are often beyond the limited resources available in many healthcare settings , especially in low- and middle-income countries .
And poorly designed and executed RCTs can just as easily produce results that are meaningless or misleading – as has been the case with HCQ and COVID-19 , as shown below .
In fact , science theorists have argued that “ in the end , an observational study with credible corrections and a more relevant and much larger study sample…may provide a better estimate [ than small or flawed RCTs ] .
” Given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the COVID-19 pandemic , it would be difficult , if not impossible , to organize and implement high-quality RCTs in the time available .
This means that decisions about HCQ and other drugs necessarily have to be based on the results of observational studies , which , again , have yielded hundreds of useful drugs and guided medical decision over many decades .
This process is in line with precedents established in previous epidemic emergencies , including the first SARS epidemic and 2014 Ebola epidemic .
There , public health policy makers authorized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ritonavir , favipiravir , ribavirin , and interferon – without RCTs – due to urgent need amid insurmountable logistical and time constraints.55,56 Thus , as a matter of medical practice and especially in a pandemic emergency , it is flatly not the case that only RCT demonstration can justify adopting a treatment .
Observational trials , meta-analyses and evidential reasoning along Hill ’ s aspects , properly conducted , can serve to meet the burden of proof appropriate for adoption , as a matter of science and public-health policy .
The opposition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has largely ignored these basic facts .
Sass continued on to expand on the media ’ s role in politicization of HCQ only because Trump mentioned it .
He claimed the media attempted to use science in its political attacks by promoting studies that indicated negative outcomes for HCQ while ignoring the positive ones .
“ Enabled and supported by low-quality science and scientific malpractice , the new narrative overwhelmingly emphasized the “ unproven ” nature of the drug because of the lack of RCTs , while dismissing as “ anecdotal ” the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the lamestream government-controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia ( LGCPEE ) was quick to reference low-quality observational studies when those studies presented a negative result – a clear double standard .
Sass went on to claim this entire fiasco was a case of scientific malpractice .
“ The shortcomings of major scientific studies cited by HCQ critics weren ’ t limited to low numbers , poor study controls , and changing metrics .
The politically motivated campaign to discredit the drug extended to what can only be classified as scientific malpractice.
” Specifically , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lancet that concluded HCQ did not help COVID-19 patients but it increased their chance of death .
The problem – independent scientists noted the journal violated its own ethical guidelines by failing to verify the underlying data contained in the article .
When the Lancet attempted to obtain a copy of the study authors underlying data during their own investigation , the authors refused to provide it resulting in the Lancet retracting the study – a first for the prestigious publication .
Unfortunately , the damage was done .
Health officials and public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific narrative .
By systematically misrepresenting HCQ ’ s efficacy and safety for political ends , its opponents have deprived many tens of thousands of Americans of a potentially life-saving treatment and risk even more in the months and years to come .
Members of the news media , public health community , and regulatory agencies must stop politicizing the use of this medicine .
Properly powered RCTs can and should be conducted to confirm HCQ ’ s efficacy against COVID-19 and help us better understand both the drug and the disease .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ data to demonstrate that HCQ has therapeutic value against COVID-19 , and that the theoretical risk of harm absolutely does not compare to the very real threat of this disease left untreated .
The burden of proof has been met .
HCQ should be more widely recommended , prescribed and promoted to treat COVID-19 right now .
One could conclude this is more than a case of mere “ scientific malpractice ” ; it could be argued this is a case of medical malpractice – the intentional withholding of a treatment regime that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be effective that may have contributed to untold numbers of deaths , increased healthcare costs to individuals , and untold emotional and mental distress of loved ones and sufferers .
Underlying all of this is the indisputable fact that China claimed there was this “ new ” coronavirus without providing any proof .
The WHO , taking China ’ s claim as fact , declared a “ new ” coronavirus causing a pandemic .
Again , without any proof being provided .
The CDC parroted what the WHO and China claimed .
Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t seen a patient or practiced in the field of infectious disease since residency to be the “ expert ” , who then parroted what the WHO , CDC , and China claimed .
In a clear case of hypocrisy , Fauci , Redfield and another colleague authored an article in the March issue of The New England Journal of Medicine claiming this “ new ” coronavirus was no more dangerous than seasonal influenza while telling the American public something different .
As a matter of fact , The New England Journal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s authors have retracted the claim or the article .
If the credibility isn ’ t damaged at this point , these individuals , including Trump , and agencies issued all manner of “ measures ” to counter the spread of something unproven to exist without even knowing if the measures were effective or not .
It seems , again , the model was China – it supposedly worked in China so it was done here .
And , the final nails in the coffin of credibility for any of these agencies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ low quality science ; promotion of scientific and medical malpractice ; intentionally inflating the number of cases and deaths caused by whatever is making people sick ; intentionally changing the calculations of infection fatality rates , case fatality rates and mortality rates to mixing those rates together to increase fear in the public ; intentionally lying to the public to promote an agenda and a poisonous vaccine ; declaring a pandemic on the say-so of the WHO without any evidence proving such ; irreparable damage to the US economy , individual livelihoods , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public ; attempting to profit from an unnecessary vaccine ; and the increase in suicides , domestic abuse and child abuse that has resulted because of their actions .
Let ’ s get a few things straight .
What these people claim is coronavirus is human genome 8 : primary assembly .
No microorganism has been isolated that scientists can point definitely at as causing COVID-19 .
Koch ’ s and Rivers ’ postulates have not been met and scientists have deviated from the gold standard procedure to isolate a microorganism in order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they report is “ genetic material ” , which is never mentioned in Koch ’ s or Rivers ’ postulates and therefore , can not say this “ material ” causes the illness or reported illness with which people are suffering .
The test used to determine whether one has or does not have coronavirus , the RT-PCR , was not developed for diagnostic purposes and has an extraordinarily high false positive rate because it was meant to manufacture growth and sequences of microorganisms already isolated .
And , with the CDC revising @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of deaths were attributed to COVID-19 alone , this lowers the threshold to below epidemic and pandemic levels .
Does anymore need to be said ?
This has been used in order to control the people and strip liberties to usher in a global agenda .
Not one individual has provided proof this is something new .
What these individuals have done is lie over and over to the public ; and , the public has bought it hook , line and sinker .
Well , most of the public did .
People @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , conned , and played for fools .
As long as you continue buying their lies , these infringements upon your liberties and the control will continue in order to inject you with their snake-oil in the form of a vaccine for a “ nothing-burger ” that will chip you , change your DNA , put nanobots in your system , input information into you , send information to who knows who , tattoo you , and if that isn ’ t enough , possibly kill you .
Article posted with permission from @ @ @ @

One has to ask one’s self daily, will the propaganda surrounding CON-VID-19 ever end? And, yes, we can call COVID-19 the CON-VID-19 because this “illness” is either contrived, a ruse, a confidence trick, or all of the above. Considering that China first announced it, the World Health Organization (WHO) parroted the Chinese narrative, and Italy was hit hard early on due to its monetary dealings with China, there has not been one scientist or scientific publication that has reported the isolation of the microorganism and its responsibility for causing COVID-19. Yet, here we all are in the united States dealing with “forced house arrest”, mask mandates, social distancing recommendations, and limited gatherings (except for Antifa, BLM, etc. riots), along with continually changing recommendations from organizations and “infectious disease experts” that have totally lost credibility.
While the CDC, the “infectious disease experts”, government officials, and the lamestream government-controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia (LGCPEE) continues to spout the number of “over 200,000 deaths in the US from CON-VID-19” while the CDC’s own website touts the number of deaths from CON-VID-19 alone at 6 %, nations that have utilized the malaria drug Hydroxychloroquine have experienced 75 % less deaths from coronavirus.
Have you wondered why? You would not be alone; a physicians’ association is asking the same question.
WND reported:
With media solemnly spotlighting the passing of the 200,000 mark in deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the United States, a physicians association has a question.
“Why is the death rate about 75 percent lower in many countries?” asked Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
The reference is to a country-based analysis updated Sept. 20 that shows a gap between countries that treat COVID-19 early or prophylactically with hydroxychloroquine and those that, like the U.S., discourage or prohibit its use.
The answer to Orient’s question can be found in a white paper published by the Economic Standard this month titled “Hydroxychloroquine and the Burden of Proof: An Urgent Call to Depoliticize Medicine in the COVID-19 Pandemic.”
In the above referenced white paper, the Editor-in-Chief, Erik Sass, wrote:
The COVID-19 pandemic struck America nine months before a presidential election, turning basic medical activities like testing and treatment into partisan battlegrounds. No subject has been more distorted than hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a safe, versatile medicine that has treated hundreds of millions of people for numerous diseases for seven decades.
HCQ was adopted as a COVID-19 treatment in Asia in January 2020 without fanfare, based on lab tests with the related coronavirus SARS-1. But when President Trump stated in March that the U.S. would also begin studying the drug’s potential against the virus, political opponents defied longstanding scientific and medical consensus to portray HCQ as harmful and Trump as a mortal danger to public health. Flawed and even falsified studies were published and promoted by media outlets eager to discredit Trump, while positive studies were impugned or ignored.
Sass went on to say this campaign against the use of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) persists even with evidence of the benefit of use against COVID-19 growing, “including scores of observational controlled trials showing therapeutic effect when administered early in disease progression.”
The entire overview by Sass continued:
Hundreds of drugs have been approved for both indication-specific and general usage on the basis of similar observational trials, especially when conducted in large numbers and subject to careful meta-analysis. As a matter of medical practice and especially in a pandemic emergency, it is flatly not the case that only randomized controlled trials can justify adopting a treatment, as HCQ detractors have insisted while publicizing randomized controlled trials results that are themselves deeply flawed.
The U.S. is an international outlier on HCQ. Right now, doctors around the world are prescribing HCQ to treat COVID-19 outside of hospitals, as well as prophylactically to prevent infection among healthcare workers and vulnerable populations. This paper argues that HCQ has met the appropriate burden of proof and urges members of the U.S. news media, public health community, and regulatory agencies to stop politicizing the use of this medicine.
Tens of thousand of lives still hang in the balance.
If there is such a thing as COVID-19 and there is an acceptable treatment for it, why are individuals like Fauci, Birx, Gates, Redfield, and a host of others pushing a vaccine that is planned to be mandatory? Simple. These individuals will profit handsomely from a vaccine, but would not from the treatment with readily available medications. Remember, Dr. Carrie Modej referenced the Emergency Preparedness Act whereby vaccines cannot be mandated or forced when there is an effective treatment regime or prevention for the particular illness the vaccine targets. Scientists have not isolated the microorganism claimed to cause COVID-19. In fact, the scientific experiments have not followed the gold standard for microorganism isolation and cannot meet Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates. So, what are we dealing with here? No one knows. And someone knows if this is a nothing burger as well.
WND highlighted some lessons from this paper.
Flawed and even falsified studies were published and promoted by media outlets eager to discredit Trump, while positive studies were impugned or ignored.
HCQ is commonly prescribed for at least 25 indications in addition to malaria.
The drug’s prolongation of the QT interval is in the mid-range of 30 commonly used drugs.
Hundreds of drugs have been approved without randomized controlled trials, including the tetanus vaccine, insulin, tetracycline, warfarin, heparin, prednisone, Keflex and high-dose penicillin for neurosyphilis.
Only 8.5% of the American Heart Association’s guidelines are supported by randomized controlled trials.
On page six of the white paper, there are scores of illnesses listed for which HCQ is effective and has potential for use – it’s not just for malaria. In fact, the paper cites HCQ as a “safe, well-tolerated drug.” As WND pointed out, the drug does prolong the QT electrical interval of the heart; however, it is within acceptable guidelines along with 30 other commonly used medications.
The problem has occurred with randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational trials. Page twelve of this report discusses this and lists 24 drugs and treatments that were approved without RCTs. So, why the problem with Hydroxycloroquine?
According to Sass:
Government regulatory agencies in the U.S. and across the world routinely use observational study evidence to make inferences about causal outcomes. The foundational method for such work was laid out in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill. He identified nine “aspects” of causal reasoning evidence that in sum provide a rationale for deducing causation. To this day the aspects identified by Hill remain the most widely used framework for general causal reasoning across medicine, science and law. One of these aspects is “experiment,” which includes RCTs, but these comprise only a small component of causal evidence. Hill’s main point is that all forms of scientific evidence must be considered and weighed, with no single type considered solely definitive.
It’s particularly unrealistic to demand RCTs confirming HCQ’s efficacy against COVID-19 before using it for that purpose for a number of reasons. Ethical considerations play a role, as some healthcare providers might refuse to carry out RCTs during a pandemic because it requires knowingly giving ill people a placebo or putatively less effective medication. RCTs also face logistical challenges. High-quality randomized studies require intensive preparation, controls and oversight. These expenses are often beyond the limited resources available in many healthcare settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries. And poorly designed and executed RCTs can just as easily produce results that are meaningless or misleading – as has been the case with HCQ and COVID-19, as shown below. In fact, science theorists have argued that “in the end, an observational study with credible corrections and a more relevant and much larger study sample…may provide a better estimate [than small or flawed RCTs].”
Given the ethical and logistical constraints imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to organize and implement high-quality RCTs in the time available. This means that decisions about HCQ and other drugs necessarily have to be based on the results of observational studies, which, again, have yielded hundreds of useful drugs and guided medical decision over many decades.
This process is in line with precedents established in previous epidemic emergencies, including the first SARS epidemic and 2014 Ebola epidemic. There, public health policy makers authorized clinical use of unproven treatments like lopinavir, ritonavir, favipiravir, ribavirin, and interferon – without RCTs – due to urgent need amid insurmountable logistical and time constraints.55,56
Thus, as a matter of medical practice and especially in a pandemic emergency, it is flatly not the case that only RCT demonstration can justify adopting a treatment. Observational trials, meta-analyses and evidential reasoning along Hill’s aspects, properly conducted, can serve to meet the burden of proof appropriate for adoption, as a matter of science and public-health policy. The opposition to HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19 has largely ignored these basic facts.
Sass continued on to expand on the media’s role in politicization of HCQ only because Trump mentioned it. He claimed the media attempted to use science in its political attacks by promoting studies that indicated negative outcomes for HCQ while ignoring the positive ones. “Enabled and supported by low-quality science and scientific malpractice, the new narrative overwhelmingly emphasized the “unproven” nature of the drug because of the lack of RCTs, while dismissing as “anecdotal” the positive findings of observational studies.” Moreover, the lamestream government-controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia (LGCPEE) was quick to reference low-quality observational studies when those studies presented a negative result – a clear double standard.
Sass went on to claim this entire fiasco was a case of scientific malpractice.
“The shortcomings of major scientific studies cited by HCQ critics weren’t limited to low numbers, poor study controls, and changing metrics. The politically motivated campaign to discredit the drug extended to what can only be classified as scientific malpractice.” Specifically, Sass pointed to the article in the Lancet that concluded HCQ did not help COVID-19 patients but it increased their chance of death. The problem – independent scientists noted the journal violated its own ethical guidelines by failing to verify the underlying data contained in the article. When the Lancet attempted to obtain a copy of the study authors underlying data during their own investigation, the authors refused to provide it resulting in the Lancet retracting the study – a first for the prestigious publication. Unfortunately, the damage was done. Health officials and public health regulators continued to quote a false scientific narrative.
The paper concluded:
By systematically misrepresenting HCQ’s efficacy and safety for political ends, its opponents have deprived many tens of thousands of Americans of a potentially life-saving treatment and risk even more in the months and years to come. Members of the news media, public health community, and regulatory agencies must stop politicizing the use of this medicine. Properly powered RCTs can and should be conducted to confirm HCQ’s efficacy against COVID-19 and help us better understand both the drug and the disease. But there is sufficient credible, scientific data to demonstrate that HCQ has therapeutic value against COVID-19, and that the theoretical risk of harm absolutely does not compare to the very real threat of this disease left untreated. The burden of proof has been met. HCQ should be more widely recommended, prescribed and promoted to treat COVID-19 right now.
One could conclude this is more than a case of mere “scientific malpractice”; it could be argued this is a case of medical malpractice – the intentional withholding of a treatment regime that has been proven in observational trials to be effective that may have contributed to untold numbers of deaths, increased healthcare costs to individuals, and untold emotional and mental distress of loved ones and sufferers.
Underlying all of this is the indisputable fact that China claimed there was this “new” coronavirus without providing any proof. The WHO, taking China’s claim as fact, declared a “new” coronavirus causing a pandemic. Again, without any proof being provided. The CDC parroted what the WHO and China claimed. Trump appointed a government paper pusher who hasn’t seen a patient or practiced in the field of infectious disease since residency to be the “expert”, who then parroted what the WHO, CDC, and China claimed. In a clear case of hypocrisy, Fauci, Redfield and another colleague authored an article in the March issue of The New England Journal of Medicine claiming this “new” coronavirus was no more dangerous than seasonal influenza while telling the American public something different. As a matter of fact, The New England Journal of Medicine nor any of that article’s authors have retracted the claim or the article.
If the credibility isn’t damaged at this point, these individuals, including Trump, and agencies issued all manner of “measures” to counter the spread of something unproven to exist without even knowing if the measures were effective or not. It seems, again, the model was China – it supposedly worked in China so it was done here. And, the final nails in the coffin of credibility for any of these agencies and people should be the use of low quality science; promotion of scientific and medical malpractice; intentionally inflating the number of cases and deaths caused by whatever is making people sick; intentionally changing the calculations of infection fatality rates, case fatality rates and mortality rates to mixing those rates together to increase fear in the public; intentionally lying to the public to promote an agenda and a poisonous vaccine; declaring a pandemic on the say-so of the WHO without any evidence proving such; irreparable damage to the US economy, individual livelihoods, small business, and the entire American public; attempting to profit from an unnecessary vaccine; and the increase in suicides, domestic abuse and child abuse that has resulted because of their actions.
Let’s get a few things straight. What these people claim is coronavirus is human genome 8: primary assembly. No microorganism has been isolated that scientists can point definitely at as causing COVID-19. Koch’s and Rivers’ postulates have not been met and scientists have deviated from the gold standard procedure to isolate a microorganism in order to identify it. Furthermore, what they report is “genetic material”, which is never mentioned in Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates and therefore, cannot say this “material” causes the illness or reported illness with which people are suffering. The test used to determine whether one has or does not have coronavirus, the RT-PCR, was not developed for diagnostic purposes and has an extraordinarily high false positive rate because it was meant to manufacture growth and sequences of microorganisms already isolated. And, with the CDC revising their website to say that 6% of deaths were attributed to COVID-19 alone, this lowers the threshold to below epidemic and pandemic levels.
Does anymore need to be said? This has been used in order to control the people and strip liberties to usher in a global agenda. Not one individual has provided proof this is something new. What these individuals have done is lie over and over to the public; and, the public has bought it hook, line and sinker. Well, most of the public did. People, you have been scammed, had, conned, and played for fools. As long as you continue buying their lies, these infringements upon your liberties and the control will continue in order to inject you with their snake-oil in the form of a vaccine for a “nothing-burger” that will chip you, change your DNA, put nanobots in your system, input information into you, send information to who knows who, tattoo you, and if that isn’t enough, possibly kill you.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-24--3 Events That Have Greatly Shaken America During The Month Of September

We were warned to “ brace ourselves ” as we entered the month of September , and this month has definitely turned out to be a critical turning point .
As I write this article , some of the biggest wildfires in history continue to rage on the west coast , political activists are preparing for weeks of chaos in Washington D.C. as they attempt to derail Republican attempts to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg ’ s vacant seat on the Supreme Court , and protesters all over the country are pouring into the streets filled with fury because of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Breonna Taylor case .
This entire year has been a nightmare , and it certainly appears that events are only going to escalate even more during the months ahead .
Let ’ s start by talking about the unprecedented wildfires on the west coast .
Right now , vast stretches of California , Oregon and Washington look like something out of a post-apocalyptic horror novel .
Entire communities have been completely wiped off the map and millions of acres have been burned .
Yes , there are wildfires every year , but we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In fact , over the past two months , we have seen five of the six biggest wildfires in the recorded history of the state of California… It had been hoped that cooler weather would mean that the worst was behind us , but instead , authorities are warning that another “ heat dome ” will soon cover much of the west coast until early October… So what this means is that the worst wildfire season in California history could soon get even worse .
Meanwhile , a fire of a different sort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The sudden passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg has set the stage for a battle for the ages in Washington .
No member of the Supreme Court has ever been more popular with the left than Ruth Bader Ginsburg , and liberal activists are absolutely mortified that President Trump has an opportunity to fill her seat .
It is expected that Trump will announce his nominee on Saturday , and he has said that it will be a woman .
At this point , it looks like it will come down to a choice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Mitch McConnell and other Republican leaders are telling Trump that picking Barrett would be the right choice for the nation , but many on his campaign team are telling Trump that picking Lagoa would be the smartest choice politically .
In the end , it will be very interesting to watch what Trump decides to do .
And in either case , we should expect Democrats to pull out all the stops in order to try to keep the seat from being filled before the election .
In the middle of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to plunge major cities all over the nation into another round of civil unrest .
BLM activists were desperately hoping that the three police officers involved in the shootout that resulted in the death of Breonna Taylor would all be charged with murder .
Instead , only one officer was charged , and the only thing he was charged with doing wrong was “ shooting a gun into a neighboring apartment ” … This decision surprised a lot of people , but in the end , it came down to a fairly straightforward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decided that the police officers were justified in shooting into Taylor ’ s apartment because they had been fired upon first… And that just makes sense .
If I was serving as a police officer and someone shot at me , I would definitely be shooting back .
But at this point , no explanation of the legal issues is going to mitigate the pain and fury that we are seeing all over the nation .
Immediately after the decision was announced , protesters began to pour into the streets , and things @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have already been shot , and video footage of gunshots being fired that has been posted online is absolutely chilling .
What we are witnessing should greatly sadden all of us , because our society is literally being torn apart right in front of our eyes , and it should break our hearts to see Americans fighting Americans .
And it turns out that somebody anticipated that things would get crazy and had parked a U-Haul full of supplies right where the protesters could find it… What a wild month this has already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get even wilder .
The fight to stop Trump ’ s nominee for the Supreme Court will kick into high gear this weekend , and bitter disappointment over the Breonna Taylor decision is likely to spark protests in cities all over the nation for quite some time .
I believe that we have entered an era of permanent civil unrest in this country , and that is going to be true no matter who wins the election in November .
But of course , if the fight over the result of the upcoming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even months after November 3rd , that will just make things a whole lot worse .
I have such a bad feeling about what is coming , and so many others that I am hearing from feel the exact same way .
So we should continue to “ brace ourselves ” , because what we have been through already is just the tip of the iceberg .

We were warned to “brace ourselves” as we entered the month of September, and this month has definitely turned out to be a critical turning point. As I write this article, some of the biggest wildfires in history continue to rage on the west coast, political activists are preparing for weeks of chaos in Washington D.C. as they attempt to derail Republican attempts to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s vacant seat on the Supreme Court, and protesters all over the country are pouring into the streets filled with fury because of the decision that was just announced in the Breonna Taylor case. This entire year has been a nightmare, and it certainly appears that events are only going to escalate even more during the months ahead.
Let’s start by talking about the unprecedented wildfires on the west coast. Right now, vast stretches of California, Oregon and Washington look like something out of a post-apocalyptic horror novel. Entire communities have been completely wiped off the map and millions of acres have been burned.
Yes, there are wildfires every year, but we have never seen anything like this. In fact, over the past two months, we have seen five of the six biggest wildfires in the recorded history of the state of California…
The staggering statistics keep piling up for California’s wildfire season: August and September account for five of the six biggest fires in nearly 90 years of recorded history for the state. The destructive Creek Fire that continues to burn in Fresno County grew about 3,000 acres between Monday and Tuesday for a new total of 283,724 acres, leapfrogging the 2017 Thomas Fire for the No. 6 spot, according to Cal Fire records. It is 30% contained.
It had been hoped that cooler weather would mean that the worst was behind us, but instead, authorities are warning that another “heat dome” will soon cover much of the west coast until early October…
Thousands of firefighters struggling to contain dozens of blazes from California to Washington need a break in the weather to help them get the upper hand. But while temperatures have returned to near average after a blistering heat wave in mid-August and another record-shattering heat episode this month, the weather is poised to tip decidedly in the fires’ favor. A large area of high pressure, or a heat dome, is projected to build across the West at the same time as a large dip, or trough, in the jet stream delivers cold air to the Midwest and East beginning this weekend and continuing into early October.
So what this means is that the worst wildfire season in California history could soon get even worse.
Meanwhile, a fire of a different sort has erupted on the east coast.
The sudden passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg has set the stage for a battle for the ages in Washington. No member of the Supreme Court has ever been more popular with the left than Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and liberal activists are absolutely mortified that President Trump has an opportunity to fill her seat.
It is expected that Trump will announce his nominee on Saturday, and he has said that it will be a woman.
At this point, it looks like it will come down to a choice between Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa.
Mitch McConnell and other Republican leaders are telling Trump that picking Barrett would be the right choice for the nation, but many on his campaign team are telling Trump that picking Lagoa would be the smartest choice politically.
In the end, it will be very interesting to watch what Trump decides to do.
And in either case, we should expect Democrats to pull out all the stops in order to try to keep the seat from being filled before the election.
In the middle of the country, a stunning legal decision threatens to plunge major cities all over the nation into another round of civil unrest.
BLM activists were desperately hoping that the three police officers involved in the shootout that resulted in the death of Breonna Taylor would all be charged with murder. Instead, only one officer was charged, and the only thing he was charged with doing wrong was “shooting a gun into a neighboring apartment”…
On Wednesday, a Kentucky grand jury indicted one of three police officers involved in the incident on charges of wanton endangerment for shooting a gun into a neighboring apartment. Former Louisville police officer Brett Hankison is facing three felony charges. Jonathan Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove, two other officers involved, were not charged.
This decision surprised a lot of people, but in the end, it came down to a fairly straightforward application of the law. It was decided that the police officers were justified in shooting into Taylor’s apartment because they had been fired upon first…
But it likely hinged on what Attorney General Daniel Cameron told reporters Wednesday: Kentucky’s “vigorous laws on self-defense.” Cameron said there were no homicide charges again Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly and Officer Myles Cosgrove — who together fired 18 shots, six of which hit Taylor — “because they were justified in firing after being fired upon.”
And that just makes sense. If I was serving as a police officer and someone shot at me, I would definitely be shooting back.
But at this point, no explanation of the legal issues is going to mitigate the pain and fury that we are seeing all over the nation.
Immediately after the decision was announced, protesters began to pour into the streets, and things soon became violent. Two police officers have already been shot, and video footage of gunshots being fired that has been posted online is absolutely chilling.
What we are witnessing should greatly sadden all of us, because our society is literally being torn apart right in front of our eyes, and it should break our hearts to see Americans fighting Americans.
And it turns out that somebody anticipated that things would get crazy and had parked a U-Haul full of supplies right where the protesters could find it…
A parked U-Haul was waiting for the crowd up the street. It contains supplies such as signs, shields, water etc. I’m not sure how people knew what it contained.
What a wild month this has already been, and I expect it to get even wilder.
The fight to stop Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court will kick into high gear this weekend, and bitter disappointment over the Breonna Taylor decision is likely to spark protests in cities all over the nation for quite some time.
I believe that we have entered an era of permanent civil unrest in this country, and that is going to be true no matter who wins the election in November.
But of course, if the fight over the result of the upcoming presidential election drags out for weeks or even months after November 3rd, that will just make things a whole lot worse.
I have such a bad feeling about what is coming, and so many others that I am hearing from feel the exact same way.
So we should continue to “brace ourselves”, because what we have been through already is just the tip of the iceberg.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-24--‘Civility’ During Confirmation Process? Don’t Be Fooled

When it rains , it pours , I suppose .
As if we didn ’ t have enough quasi-prophetic plagues descending upon us to start with , the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg late last week has provided yet more opportunity for deep contention in the political realm .
Unfortunately , “ deep contention ” these days more resembles a nascent civil war than raised voices on the floor of the House or Senate .
Unlike those on the political left , I don ’ t favor engaging in public revelry when a high-profile member of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cancer for a protracted period of time , and no one should wish such suffering on anybody .
While her passing has provided Ginsburg a final release from that suffering , her friends and loved ones are still left to grieve , and should be able to do so in peace .
That said , I also don ’ t favor lionizing members of the opposition simply because they ’ ve died , either – an activity in which I ’ ve seen more than a few right-of-center politicos and pundits engage in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is sheer hypocrisy , and I instantly lose respect for those who do so , the exception being President Trump , who praised Ginsburg as a point of decorum , and also because he ’ s a decent guy .
The issues Ginsburg championed throughout her career are ones that were co-opted by the left , and any positive changes that came about in these areas were due to organic developments rather than liberal largesse .
If my last two offerings in this space haven ’ t made this clear : As a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in politics or on the Supreme Court .
The last 60 years – and certainly the last six months – have demonstrated unequivocally that liberalism has been the wedge that closeted radicals used to incrementally advance socialism .
Thus , permitting liberals a seat at the table and a voice in the marketplace of ideas was a mistake from Day 1 .
Despite having believed the foregoing for many years , in the past I ’ ve attenuated my criticism of liberals in this area for the sole reason that I knew most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were not necessarily aware of just how odious , amoral and villainous leftists truly are , and I surmised that I would not win hearts and minds by appearing to be pig-headed .
The last six months , however , have dramatically revealed to millions of Americans just how odious , amoral and villainous leftists truly are .
The “ setup , ” if you will , consisted of two phenomena , the first of which was Barack Obama ’ s presidency .
Among many other harmful things , Obama ’ s reign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a frightening extent .
These led to Americans electing a complete political outsider to the presidency for the first time in our history , in 2016 .
The second item consisted of the impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump .
The abject fear and desperation of Washington Democrats following Trump ’ s election led to their conducting a kangaroo court that not only evidenced their fascistic proclivities , but revealed the extent of their lawlessness .
Having already born witness to all of this , Americans then observed even more lawlessness on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face of the COVID-19 pandemic and their explicit support for communist revolutionaries who mobilized following the death of George Floyd in May .
Within hours of Justice Ginsburg ’ s death , leftists from celebrities to news anchors telegraphed their intent to escalate the civil unrest we ’ ve seen over the last six months in order to manipulate the nomination process for a new Supreme Court Justice .
This is of course similar to the threats they ’ ve made to burn the nation down should President Trump gain reelection .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s presidency was that it brought to light just how far both parties have gravitated leftward .
Many Americans rightly began to see a majority of elected Republicans as supporting socialist ascendancy to nearly the same degree as their Democratic counterparts .
Over the last four years , they ’ ve also seen a high level of disrespect and contempt exhibited for Trump by elected Republicans .
With Ginsburg ’ s death , and as we draw closer to the general election , however , we ’ re beginning to see some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – Democrats and Republicans call for civility in general and throughout the nomination process in particular .
While many moderate Republicans ( read “ RINO ” ) continue to evidence their true colors , others who ’ ve come under fire over their equivocation and grudging support for President Trump are now stating that they ’ ll support moving ahead with Trump ’ s nominee .
Such actions are also born of fear and desperation .
These people are well-aware that their antics over the last four years have driven voters to Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their actions at present are a feeble attempt at damage control .
The takeaway here is that we should not be fooled .
Socialists in our government have been playing a very long game , and all we need do is look to our large , Democrat-controlled cities to see the depth of their villainy .
Suffice it to say that any entreaties toward civility and the rule of law on their part are no more than dangerous diversions .

When it rains, it pours, I suppose. As if we didn’t have enough quasi-prophetic plagues descending upon us to start with, the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg late last week has provided yet more opportunity for deep contention in the political realm. Unfortunately, “deep contention” these days more resembles a nascent civil war than raised voices on the floor of the House or Senate.
Unlike those on the political left, I don’t favor engaging in public revelry when a high-profile member of the opposition passes. Justice Ginsburg suffered from cancer for a protracted period of time, and no one should wish such suffering on anybody. While her passing has provided Ginsburg a final release from that suffering, her friends and loved ones are still left to grieve, and should be able to do so in peace.
That said, I also don’t favor lionizing members of the opposition simply because they’ve died, either – an activity in which I’ve seen more than a few right-of-center politicos and pundits engage in this instance and in others. This is sheer hypocrisy, and I instantly lose respect for those who do so, the exception being President Trump, who praised Ginsburg as a point of decorum, and also because he’s a decent guy. The issues Ginsburg championed throughout her career are ones that were co-opted by the left, and any positive changes that came about in these areas were due to organic developments rather than liberal largesse.
If my last two offerings in this space haven’t made this clear: As a committed liberal, Ginsburg had no place in politics or on the Supreme Court. The last 60 years – and certainly the last six months – have demonstrated unequivocally that liberalism has been the wedge that closeted radicals used to incrementally advance socialism. Thus, permitting liberals a seat at the table and a voice in the marketplace of ideas was a mistake from Day 1.
Despite having believed the foregoing for many years, in the past I’ve attenuated my criticism of liberals in this area for the sole reason that I knew most people – even most rank-and-file conservatives – were not necessarily aware of just how odious, amoral and villainous leftists truly are, and I surmised that I would not win hearts and minds by appearing to be pig-headed.
The last six months, however, have dramatically revealed to millions of Americans just how odious, amoral and villainous leftists truly are. The “setup,” if you will, consisted of two phenomena, the first of which was Barack Obama’s presidency. Among many other harmful things, Obama’s reign poisoned our economy and culturally Balkanized America to a frightening extent. These led to Americans electing a complete political outsider to the presidency for the first time in our history, in 2016.
The second item consisted of the impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump. The abject fear and desperation of Washington Democrats following Trump’s election led to their conducting a kangaroo court that not only evidenced their fascistic proclivities, but revealed the extent of their lawlessness.
Having already born witness to all of this, Americans then observed even more lawlessness on the part of elected Democrats in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and their explicit support for communist revolutionaries who mobilized following the death of George Floyd in May. Within hours of Justice Ginsburg’s death, leftists from celebrities to news anchors telegraphed their intent to escalate the civil unrest we’ve seen over the last six months in order to manipulate the nomination process for a new Supreme Court Justice. This is of course similar to the threats they’ve made to burn the nation down should President Trump gain reelection.
A mixed blessing that arose with Obama’s presidency was that it brought to light just how far both parties have gravitated leftward. Many Americans rightly began to see a majority of elected Republicans as supporting socialist ascendancy to nearly the same degree as their Democratic counterparts. Over the last four years, they’ve also seen a high level of disrespect and contempt exhibited for Trump by elected Republicans.
With Ginsburg’s death, and as we draw closer to the general election, however, we’re beginning to see some of the less toxic – but decidedly anti-Trump – Democrats and Republicans call for civility in general and throughout the nomination process in particular. While many moderate Republicans (read “RINO”) continue to evidence their true colors, others who’ve come under fire over their equivocation and grudging support for President Trump are now stating that they’ll support moving ahead with Trump’s nominee.
Such actions are also born of fear and desperation. These people are well-aware that their antics over the last four years have driven voters to Trump, rather than away from him, and their actions at present are a feeble attempt at damage control.
The takeaway here is that we should not be fooled. Socialists in our government have been playing a very long game, and all we need do is look to our large, Democrat-controlled cities to see the depth of their villainy. Suffice it to say that any entreaties toward civility and the rule of law on their part are no more than dangerous diversions.
Article posted with permission from Erik Rush


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-25--More Preplanned Election Chaos:  Trump Says The Supreme Court Will “Sort Out” The Election

The preplanned election chaos is ramping up .
President Donald Trump says it ’ s important to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg ’ s seat on the Supreme Court because the “ highest court ” will have to “ sort out ” the presidential election , and it ’ s important to have nine justices .
They are advertising an election that will be the fall of this country .
It will not matter who wins .
This will be ugly , they have promised us that already .
Neither side will accept defeat , and both sides are going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump has also made comments calling the Democrats ’ efforts to expand voting by mail “ a scam ” and “ a hoax , ” adding that having the full Supreme Court bench would be “ very important ” because of that .
“ I think this will end up in the Supreme Court .
And I think it ’ s important we have nine justices , ” Trump told reporters on Wednesday , at a roundtable with state attorneys-general at the White House .
Trump seemed determined to fill Ginsburg ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to make sure the court is on his side if/when this contested political theatre goes all the way to the top .
When asked about the timing of the confirmation , he said it was “ better if you go before the election ” and that it would be “ fairly quick.
” Democrats are opposed to any nomination , arguing that Republican refusal to consider President Barack Obama ’ s nomination in 2016 has set a precedent for SCOTUS nominations in an election year .
Republicans have countered that their refusal to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Senate and the White House were not controlled by the same party , as they are now .
–RT Trump will likely be successful in filling Ginsburg ’ s seat which will cause an uproar and further advance the division between the right and left .
This could end in horrible violence if we don ’ t realize what ’ s going on .
Both sides in the left vs. right paradigm are saying that they won ’ t accept the election results and their followers will get overly angry about which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s all preplanned .
This is by design .

The preplanned election chaos is ramping up. President Donald Trump says it’s important to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the Supreme Court because the “highest court” will have to “sort out” the presidential election, and it’s important to have nine justices.
They are advertising an election that will be the fall of this country. It will not matter who wins. This will be ugly, they have promised us that already. Neither side will accept defeat, and both sides are going to make sure this plan plays out.
Trump has also made comments calling the Democrats’ efforts to expand voting by mail “a scam” and “a hoax,” adding that having the full Supreme Court bench would be “very important” because of that. “I think this will end up in the Supreme Court. And I think it’s important we have nine justices,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday, at a roundtable with state attorneys-general at the White House.
Trump seemed determined to fill Ginsburg’s seat before the election because he wants to make sure the court is on his side if/when this contested political theatre goes all the way to the top. When asked about the timing of the confirmation, he said it was “better if you go before the election” and that it would be “fairly quick.”
Democrats are opposed to any nomination, arguing that Republican refusal to consider President Barack Obama’s nomination in 2016 has set a precedent for SCOTUS nominations in an election year. Republicans have countered that their refusal to consider Merrick Garland was different, because the Senate and the White House were not controlled by the same party, as they are now. –RT
Trump will likely be successful in filling Ginsburg’s seat which will cause an uproar and further advance the division between the right and left. This could end in horrible violence if we don’t realize what’s going on. Both sides in the left vs. right paradigm are saying that they won’t accept the election results and their followers will get overly angry about which president is selected this November.
And it’s all preplanned. This is by design.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-25--Georgia:  School District Orders Mom to Wear Mask or Be Barred From Son’s Football Game Despite Reli

Georgia:  School District Orders Mom to Wear Mask or Be Barred From Son’s Football Game Despite Religious Objections and Social Distancing Mandate

Georgia : School District Orders Mom to Wear Mask or Be Barred From Son ’ s Football Game Despite Religious Objections and Social Distancing Mandate ATLANTA , Ga. — The Rutherford Institute has come to the aid of a Georgia mother who has been barred from attending her son ’ s high school football games unless she compromises her religious beliefs and complies with the school district ’ s mask requirement for spectators .
In a letter to the superintendent of Fulton County ( Ga. ) Schools ( FCS ) , Rutherford Institute attorneys point out that Tara Barnett ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s football games without a face covering while social distancing from other spectators qualifies for a religious accommodation under Governor Kemp ’ s executive orders , which requires masks to be worn when social distancing is not possible .
All spectators at FCS athletic events are required to social distance by sitting in designated areas six feet apart from other spectators unless sitting with family .
“ No parent should be forced to choose between abiding by their religious beliefs or exercising their parental rights , especially not when the government has no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasonable accommodations can be made , ” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead , president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America : The War on the American People .
“ If the governor is willing to accommodate religious beliefs and provide mask exemptions to those who social distance , school officials must do no less.
” Since March 2020 , Georgia ’ s Governor has issued a series of Executive Orders responding to the COVID-19 pandemic .
In three Orders issued in August and September , Gov .
Kemp authorized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Face Covering Requirement [ s ] ” mandating that persons “ wear face masks or face coverings when not able to maintain Social Distancing from non-cohabitating persons [ . ]
” Each of the three Orders provides that a local mask requirement “ shall not be applied to .
.
.
, those who have a bona fide religious objection to wearing a face mask or face covering [ . ]
” Tara Barnett , whose son is a member of the junior varsity football team at Milton High School , received an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spectators at FCS athletic events will be required to wear a face covering and that spectators will be required to social distance at the event venue , i.e.
, only sit in designated areas and sit six feet apart unless sitting with family .
Upon learning of the mask/face covering requirement , Mrs. Barnett contacted the school ’ s athletic director and requested an accommodation from the mask requirement because of her sincere religious beliefs in opposition to the use of masks or face coverings .
The FCS athletic director denied Mrs. Barnett @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the face covering mandate .
In its letter to FCS on behalf of Mrs. Barnett , The Rutherford Institute asserts that the denial of her request for an accommodation so she can attend her son ’ s football games clearly contradicts Gov .
Kemp ’ s Orders requiring local face covering rules allow for exemptions based on religious beliefs .
Any local requirement more strict than the Order is preempted and in violation of state law .
In interceding on behalf of Mrs. Barnett ’ s parental and First Amendment interests , Rutherford @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandate for FCS football games exceeds the authority granted by Gov .
Kemp ’ s Executive Orders , is more restrictive than the Orders allow , and thereby violates State law and Mrs. Barnett ’ s right to religious freedom under the First Amendment .
The Rutherford Institute , a nonprofit civil liberties organization , defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated and educates the public about threats to their freedoms .
The Rutherford Institute ’ s letter to the Fulton County Schools Superintendent

ATLANTA, Ga. — The Rutherford Institute has come to the aid of a Georgia mother who has been barred from attending her son’s high school football games unless she compromises her religious beliefs and complies with the school district’s mask requirement for spectators. In a letter to the superintendent of Fulton County (Ga.) Schools (FCS), Rutherford Institute attorneys point out that Tara Barnett’s request to attend her son’s football games without a face covering while social distancing from other spectators qualifies for a religious accommodation under Governor Kemp’s executive orders, which requires masks to be worn when social distancing is not possible. All spectators at FCS athletic events are required to social distance by sitting in designated areas six feet apart from other spectators unless sitting with family.
“No parent should be forced to choose between abiding by their religious beliefs or exercising their parental rights, especially not when the government has no compelling interest for doing so and when reasonable accommodations can be made,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People . “If the governor is willing to accommodate religious beliefs and provide mask exemptions to those who social distance, school officials must do no less.”
Since March 2020, Georgia’s Governor has issued a series of Executive Orders responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. In three Orders issued in August and September, Gov. Kemp authorized government entities to impose “Local Option Face Covering Requirement[s]” mandating that persons “wear face masks or face coverings when not able to maintain Social Distancing from non-cohabitating persons[.]”
Each of the three Orders provides that a local mask requirement “shall not be applied to . . ., those who have a bona fide religious objection to wearing a face mask or face covering[.]”
Tara Barnett, whose son is a member of the junior varsity football team at Milton High School, received an email from the school announcing that all spectators at FCS athletic events will be required to wear a face covering and that spectators will be required to social distance at the event venue, i.e., only sit in designated areas and sit six feet apart unless sitting with family.
Upon learning of the mask/face covering requirement, Mrs. Barnett contacted the school’s athletic director and requested an accommodation from the mask requirement because of her sincere religious beliefs in opposition to the use of masks or face coverings.
The FCS athletic director denied Mrs. Barnett’s request to be exempt from the face covering mandate. In its letter to FCS on behalf of Mrs. Barnett, The Rutherford Institute asserts that the denial of her request for an accommodation so she can attend her son’s football games clearly contradicts Gov. Kemp’s Orders requiring local face covering rules allow for exemptions based on religious beliefs.
Any local requirement more strict than the Order is preempted and in violation of state law.
In interceding on behalf of Mrs. Barnett’s parental and First Amendment interests, Rutherford Institute attorneys warn that the face covering mandate for FCS football games exceeds the authority granted by Gov. Kemp’s Executive Orders, is more restrictive than the Orders allow, and thereby violates State law and Mrs. Barnett’s right to religious freedom under the First Amendment.
The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties organization, defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated and educates the public about threats to their freedoms.
The Rutherford Institute’s letter to the Fulton County Schools Superintendent
Article posted with permission from John Whitehead


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-25--Veteran Seeks To Aid & Unite Veterans In His Country & Across Earth Against COVID Tyranny

Mick Stott is a British Army veteran who served for 30 years with the Army Physical Training Corps .
He specializes in mental preparation and has worked with International Sport producing Olympians and teams for world cups .
He has also worked with veteran mental health and has a system that helps vets regain their lives from PTSD and has delivered these all over the world .
He spoke at the Act & Resist event at Trafalgar Square on September 19 , 2020 and helped to organize the veterans in attendance and joins me in this episode to talk about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to not only unite the veterans of his country against the tyrants there , but aid in uniting veterans throughout the Earth to unite against it in their own lands .
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to his `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

Mick Stott is a British Army veteran who served for 30 years with the Army Physical Training Corps. He specializes in mental preparation and has worked with International Sport producing Olympians and teams for world cups. He has also worked with veteran mental health and has a system that helps vets regain their lives from PTSD and has delivered these all over the world. He spoke at the Act & Resist event at Trafalgar Square on September 19, 2020 and helped to organize the veterans in attendance and joins me in this episode to talk about his work and how he is seeking to not only unite the veterans of his country against the tyrants there, but aid in uniting veterans throughout the Earth to unite against it in their own lands.
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-25--South Dakota Governor: I Don’t Have The Authority To Lockdown The State, They Are Attacking Our Reli

South Dakota Governor : I Don ’ t Have The Authority To Lockdown The State , They Are Attacking Our Religious Freedoms – What Is It That The People Don ’ t See Here ?
“ So I never issued a shelter-in-place , I never closed a business .
I didn ’ t even define an essential business … because I don ’ t have the authority to do that.
” Governor Kristi Noam 9 Governors of states within our union have refused to play games with the likes of the federal government , Bill gates and his little henchman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have perpetuated on the people of this country .
And the one Governor that seems to stand out more then others is that of South Dakota ’ s Kristi Noam .
Krist said that “ I know that when you have a leader overstep their authority in a time of crisis , that ’ s really when you lose this country .
And I didn ’ t want to be guilty of doing that , ” Gov .
Kristi Noem said .
Justthenews.com reported “ South Dakota Gov .
Kristi Noem has declined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus pandemic even as other government leaders around the nation issued restrictions that significantly throttled the U.S. economy .
She said that she listened both to health officials and to individuals who informed her about the bounds of her gubernatorial authorities.
” “ I know that when you have a leader overstep their authority in a time of crisis , that ’ s really when you lose this country .
And I didn ’ t want to be guilty of doing that , ” the Republican Gov .
explained during an interview on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” podcast .
“ So I never issued a shelter-in-place , I never closed a business .
I didn ’ t even define an essential business … because I don ’ t have the authority to do that.
” She went on “ Noem explained .
And during those calls she found that fear was driving people ’ s actions .
“ What I am saying though is that what I heard on those conference calls was fear , ” she said .
“ I was shocked and amazed by how fear controlled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And to me it indicated that in this country we ’ ve lost faith and the steadfast promise of God ’ s faithfulness in our life every day has real consequences.
” She said that Americans must defend their religious liberty , which has been attacked amid the pandemic .
“ They are attacking our religious freedoms .
And so we need to use every tool that we have to make sure that we still have the ability to practice our faith and to gather as we see fit , ” the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ directly seen in many of these states where they have allowed other gatherings yet restricted those who want to go to church and worship together.
” So I ask that if the people in this country see that this is completely un-Constitutional and that the federal government along with some of the states Governors and Mayors are attacking businesses and the church then why is it that people are falling into line with this perpetuated fraud ( Psalm 78:9 , 94:20 , Ephesians 4:14 ) .
In conclusion : The people must rise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these tyrants for transgressing the US Constitution and indict each and everyone of them ( Article 2 section 4 , Article 1 section Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media .
Article by Bradlee Dean .

South Dakota Governor: I Don’t Have The Authority To Lockdown The State, They Are Attacking Our Religious Freedoms – What Is It That The People Don’t See Here?
“So I never issued a shelter-in-place, I never closed a business. I didn’t even define an essential business … because I don’t have the authority to do that.” Governor Kristi Noem
9 Governors of states within our union have refused to play games with the likes of the federal government, Bill Gates and his little henchman Anthony Fauci concerning the fraud that they have perpetuated on the people of this country.
https://www.facebook.com/1578426990/videos/10220954193796089/?extid=XMjxhgzxMgnKYcZ1
And the one Governor that seems to stand out more then others is that of South Dakota’s Kristi Noam. Kristi said that “I know that when you have a leader overstep their authority in a time of crisis, that’s really when you lose this country. And I didn’t want to be guilty of doing that,” Gov. Kristi Noem said.
Justthenews.com reported “South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem has declined to lock down her state amid the coronavirus pandemic even as other government leaders around the nation issued restrictions that significantly throttled the U.S. economy.
She said that she listened both to health officials and to individuals who informed her about the bounds of her gubernatorial authorities.”
“I know that when you have a leader overstep their authority in a time of crisis, that’s really when you lose this country. And I didn’t want to be guilty of doing that,” the Republican Gov. explained during an interview on “The Pod’s Honest Truth” podcast. “So I never issued a shelter-in-place, I never closed a business. I didn’t even define an essential business … because I don’t have the authority to do that.”
She went on “Noem explained. And during those calls, she found that fear was driving people’s actions.
“What I am saying though is that what I heard on those conference calls was fear,” she said. “I was shocked and amazed by how fear controlled people and how emotional that they were. And to me it indicated that in this country we’ve lost faith and the steadfast promise of God’s faithfulness in our life every day has real consequences.”
She said that Americans must defend their religious liberty, which has been attacked amid the pandemic.
“They are attacking our religious freedoms. And so we need to use every tool that we have to make sure that we still have the ability to practice our faith and to gather as we see fit,” the governor said. “And we have directly seen in many of these states where they have allowed other gatherings yet restricted those who want to go to church and worship together.”
So I ask that if the people in this country see that this is completely un-Constitutional and that the federal government along with some of the states Governors and Mayors are attacking businesses and the church then why is it that people are falling into line with this perpetuated fraud (Psalm 78:9, 94:20, Ephesians 4:14).
In conclusion: The people must rise up and impeach every single one of these tyrants for transgressing the US Constitution and indict each and every one of them (Article 2, Section 4).
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media. Article by Bradlee Dean.