thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-03--Arizona:  Cops Knock On Innocent Family’s Door, Murder Dad When He Answers – Taxpayers Hit With $3 M

Arizona:  Cops Knock On Innocent Family’s Door, Murder Dad When He Answers – Taxpayers Hit With $3 Million Bill (Video)

Phoenix , AZ — Ryan Whitaker , 40 , and father of two , had committed no crime , had harmed no one and was merely answering his door when Phoenix police officer Jeff Cooke dumped three rounds into him — killing him in cold blood .
The shooting took place in May , and the officers involved have faced no accountability whatsoever .
As a result , the taxpayers of Phoenix will be shelling out a record amount of money in the form of a lawsuit .
On Wednesday afternoon , the Phoenix City Council voted unanimously to approve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family of Ryan Whitaker .
“ There ’ s no amount of money that will bring my brother back or ease that pain .
It ’ s just really hard , ” said Katie Baeza , Whitaker ’ s older sister .
The incident started over a noise complaint from Whitaker ’ s upstairs neighbor and ended with the murder of an innocent father .
A family for the attorney described the call to police about the noise as “ exaggerated ” which put Whitaker and his girlfriend Brandee Nees ’ lives in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knew this .
“ The Phoenix Police Department knew from the night of the shooting that this was a false and exaggerated 911 call , ” Matthew Cunnigham , the family ’ s lawyer said .
The nosy neighbor from upstairs — without any evidence — called police claiming they heard a loud argument that may be getting physical .
The caller even said on the 911 recording that they claimed it was “ physical ” just to get the cops out there faster .
“ It could be physical , ” the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I could say yeah if that makes anybody hurry on up .
Get anybody here faster.
” But there was no domestic dispute at all .
Whitaker was playing video games with his girlfriend and the two were just excited about it .
That was all the caller said , nothing else .
In fact , it was so vague that officer Cooke and his partner officer John Ferragamo joked about how ridiculous it was as they walked to Whitaker ’ s front door .
“ Did you like all that helpful info @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ferragamo is heard telling Cooke as they walk to Whitaker ’ s apartment , according to the footage .
“ ‘ I ’ m just gon na say yes to all the questions to get the officers here faster , ’ ” Ferragamo says , mocking the caller .
As the video shows , the officers knock at the door , say ‘ police ’ , and then step out of view of the peephole , not letting the people inside see who is actually there .
Literally , any criminal in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Because strangers had harassed Whitaker at his apartment a few days earlier , he grabbed his legally owned firearm and answered the door .
Three seconds later , he ’ d be shot in the back , dying on his front porch .
“ Hands , ” the officer says before opening fire .
Whitaker , according to the video appeared to be entirely compliant , yet Cooke opened fire immediately anyway .
“ Holy sh-t !
” Ferragamo is heard saying after his partner killed the innocent father .
Nees , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve died too , then exits from the apartment , visibly distraught .
Cooke responds , “ He just pulled a gun on us , ma ’ am.
” But the video shows he “ pulled ” no gun , was kneeling down , and trying to put the gun on the ground when he was executed .
“ Because it ’ s dark and someone just knocked on the door , ” she yelled at Cooke , explaining to her boyfriend ’ s killer why it was logical for Whitaker to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ It ’ s okay.
” It ’ s unclear if he says this to Cooke or Nees .
At this point , Whitaker is still dying on the ground in front of his home and neither officer is attempting to save his life .
Nees asks the officers why they are there in the first place and the officers told them they received a call about the yelling .
Nees then proceeds to tell the officers Whitaker answered with the gun because a few days earlier , someone suspiciously knocked on his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them through the peephole .
Sadly , it appears that this was the same thing that happened this time , only it was the cops hiding out of the peephole ’ s view .
As the conversation continues , the officers realize no crime had taken place and the “ yelling ” reported by the nosy upstairs neighbor was excitement over a video game the couple was playing .
“ Literally we were making salsa and playing Crash Bandicoot , so there may have been some screaming , ” she told the officer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It wasn ’ t domestic violence or anything.
” As Nees watches the love of her life die on the ground in front of her , she pleads with the officers to handcuff her so she can be next to him as he dies .
That request was denied .
The officers still haven ’ t done so much as provided pressure to Whitaker ’ s wounds .
When Nees asks them if they can check to see if he is okay , Ferragamo callously responds , “ I ’ m leaning toward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ He was at home playing video games and he did nothing wrong .
On the contrary , he assumed the position that anybody would , and he still lost his life , ” said Councilmember Carlos Garcia during the settlement approval .
Slow-motion video edited by the attorney shows that Whitaker had put the gun down .
What ’ s more , we can see from the video that he was putting his hand up and trying to put the gun down — clearly not threatening anyone with a gun .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ entirely legal to answer your door with a gun .
After the shooting , police did not release the body camera footage and only did so after a FOIA request from the Arizona Republic .
When they did finally release the video , they did so by selectively choosing information to help justify the shooting .
“ They put a narrative out there designed to protect and defend an officer that overreacted , ” he said .
After watching the video , it appears that this is exactly what has happened .
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ word of advice for any other innocent 2nd Amendment advocates who protect their home from uninvited intruders who show up in the middle of the night .
“ This is something that could happen to any of us , ” he said .
Indeed it can and does .
Unfortunately , Baeza , and other relatives , have been calling for accountability and action for months but to no avail .
“ Now I ’ m on to the county attorney ‘ s office to find out when someone is going to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Police Chief on when are these officers going to be fired , ” said Baeza .
Both cops are still gainfully employed with the Phoenix police department and , according to ABC 15 , the City of Phoenix is currently staring down 12 open lawsuits , seeking $ 71,150,000 , related to Phoenix PD shootings in the city ’ s fiscal 2018-19 year .
“ I just wish we had a process to not just throw money at this , but actually change policy .
Actually hold the police officers accountable , ” @ @ @

Phoenix, AZ — Ryan Whitaker, 40, and father of two, had committed no crime, had harmed no one and was merely answering his door when Phoenix police officer Jeff Cooke dumped three rounds into him — killing him in cold blood. The shooting took place in May, and the officers involved have faced no accountability whatsoever. As a result, the taxpayers of Phoenix will be shelling out a record amount of money in the form of a lawsuit.
On Wednesday afternoon, the Phoenix City Council voted unanimously to approve a $3 million settlement with the family of Ryan Whitaker.
“There’s no amount of money that will bring my brother back or ease that pain. It’s just really hard,” said Katie Baeza, Whitaker’s older sister.
The incident started over a noise complaint from Whitaker’s upstairs neighbor and ended with the murder of an innocent father. A family for the attorney described the call to police about the noise as “exaggerated” which put Whitaker and his girlfriend Brandee Nees’ lives in danger. He also said the police knew this.
“The Phoenix Police Department knew from the night of the shooting that this was a false and exaggerated 911 call,” Matthew Cunnigham, the family’s lawyer said.
The nosy neighbor from upstairs — without any evidence — called police claiming they heard a loud argument that may be getting physical.
The caller even said on the 911 recording that they claimed it was “physical” just to get the cops out there faster.
“It could be physical,” the caller told a 911 dispatcher. “I could say yeah if that makes anybody hurry on up. Get anybody here faster.”
But there was no domestic dispute at all. Whitaker was playing video games with his girlfriend and the two were just excited about it.
That was all the caller said, nothing else. In fact, it was so vague that officer Cooke and his partner officer John Ferragamo joked about how ridiculous it was as they walked to Whitaker’s front door.
“Did you like all that helpful info we got from our complainant?” Ferragamo is heard telling Cooke as they walk to Whitaker’s apartment, according to the footage.
“‘I’m just gonna say yes to all the questions to get the officers here faster,’” Ferragamo says, mocking the caller.
As the video shows, the officers knock at the door, say ‘police’, and then step out of view of the peephole, not letting the people inside see who is actually there. Literally, any criminal in the world could do the same thing.
Because strangers had harassed Whitaker at his apartment a few days earlier, he grabbed his legally owned firearm and answered the door. Three seconds later, he’d be shot in the back, dying on his front porch.
“Hands,” the officer says before opening fire. Whitaker, according to the video appeared to be entirely compliant, yet Cooke opened fire immediately anyway.
“Holy sh-t!” Ferragamo is heard saying after his partner killed the innocent father.
Nees, who was right behind Whitaker and could’ve died too, then exits from the apartment, visibly distraught.
“Why did you guys shoot him?” Nees yelled.
Cooke responds, “He just pulled a gun on us, ma’am.”
But the video shows he “pulled” no gun, was kneeling down, and trying to put the gun on the ground when he was executed.
“Because it’s dark and someone just knocked on the door,” she yelled at Cooke, explaining to her boyfriend’s killer why it was logical for Whitaker to have a gun.
Ferragamo then says, “It’s okay.” It’s unclear if he says this to Cooke or Nees.
But, Nees yells, “It’s not okay.”
At this point, Whitaker is still dying on the ground in front of his home and neither officer is attempting to save his life.
Nees asks the officers why they are there in the first place and the officers told them they received a call about the yelling. Nees then proceeds to tell the officers Whitaker answered with the gun because a few days earlier, someone suspiciously knocked on his door and fled before he could see them through the peephole.
Sadly, it appears that this was the same thing that happened this time, only it was the cops hiding out of the peephole’s view.
As the conversation continues, the officers realize no crime had taken place and the “yelling” reported by the nosy upstairs neighbor was excitement over a video game the couple was playing.
“Literally we were making salsa and playing Crash Bandicoot, so there may have been some screaming,” she told the officer, according to the video. “It wasn’t domestic violence or anything.”
As Nees watches the love of her life die on the ground in front of her, she pleads with the officers to handcuff her so she can be next to him as he dies. That request was denied.
The officers still haven’t done so much as provided pressure to Whitaker’s wounds. When Nees asks them if they can check to see if he is okay, Ferragamo callously responds, “I’m leaning toward the fact that he’s not.”
“He was at home playing video games and he did nothing wrong. On the contrary, he assumed the position that anybody would, and he still lost his life,” said Councilmember Carlos Garcia during the settlement approval.
Slow-motion video edited by the attorney shows that Whitaker had put the gun down. What’s more, we can see from the video that he was putting his hand up and trying to put the gun down — clearly not threatening anyone with a gun. What’s more, it is entirely legal to answer your door with a gun.
After the shooting, police did not release the body camera footage and only did so after a FOIA request from the Arizona Republic. When they did finally release the video, they did so by selectively choosing information to help justify the shooting.
“They put a narrative out there designed to protect and defend an officer that overreacted,” he said.
After watching the video, it appears that this is exactly what has happened. What’s more, Cunningham leaves a word of advice for any other innocent 2nd Amendment advocates who protect their home from uninvited intruders who show up in the middle of the night.
“This is something that could happen to any of us,” he said. Indeed it can and does.
Unfortunately, Baeza, and other relatives, have been calling for accountability and action for months but to no avail.
“Now I’m on to the county attorney‘s office to find out when someone is going to be held accountable. Back to the Phoenix Police Chief on when are these officers going to be fired,” said Baeza.
Both cops are still gainfully employed with the Phoenix police department and, according to ABC 15, the City of Phoenix is currently staring down 12 open lawsuits, seeking $71,150,000, related to Phoenix PD shootings in the city’s fiscal 2018-19 year.
That is a massive problem.
“I just wish we had a process to not just throw money at this, but actually change policy. Actually hold the police officers accountable,” said Garcia.
We agree.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-03--Orwell’s Ministry Of Truth Vows Ramping Up Censorship Of Vaccine Information Ahead Of Execution

Dubbing it “ misinformation , ” Facebook has promised to censor any information that goes against the official tyrannical narrative that says we should all submit to the new COVID-19 vaccine .
The tech giant has updated its misinformation policies ahead of the first batch of vaccines being administered next week .
The ruling class and their puppets really don ’ t want people to decline this vaccine .
They are doing everything in their power to sell this snake oil to as many people as possible .
As the UK is on the brink of starting to administer COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy to reflect that it will remove false claims about vaccines .
The tech giant updated its Coronavirus Newsroom post on Thursday with its commitment to taking down false information that has been debunked by public health experts regarding vaccines across Facebook and Instagram .
–CNET To date , Facebook says it has pulled down around 12 million pieces of content of this type on Facebook and on Instagram , which it also owns .
That ’ s a lot of censorship over a statistically irrelevant virus .
But they are doubling down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have freedom of speech anymore and you don ’ t have the right to consume whatever information you decide is right for you .
The tech giants and government has made the decision for everyone .
Comply or be punished .
If this vaccine was so great , and the savior of humanity as it ’ s being portrayed , they wouldn ’ t have to try so hard to silence dissenters .
The United Kingdom said on Wednesday that it has approved the Pfizer vaccination for use and plans to start administering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the UK it is working closely with the government and the NHS to support their communication plans when it comes to rolling out the vaccine .
In the newsroom post , the company outlined the kind of material it expects to remove .
–CNET What a fancy way to say that the elitists , corporations , and the ruling class will work together to silence and censor the peasants and slaves into submission .
I wonder if Facebook and the governments of the world can “ read between the lines ” on @ @

Dubbing it “misinformation,” Facebook has promised to censor any information that goes against the official tyrannical narrative that says we should all submit to the new COVID-19 vaccine. The tech giant has updated its misinformation policies ahead of the first batch of vaccines being administered next week.
The ruling class and their puppets really don’t want people to decline this vaccine. They are doing everything in their power to sell this snake oil to as many people as possible.
As the UK is on the brink of starting to administer COVID-19 vaccinations, Facebook has updated its misinformation policy to reflect that it will remove false claims about vaccines. The tech giant updated its Coronavirus Newsroom post on Thursday with its commitment to taking down false information that has been debunked by public health experts regarding vaccines across Facebook and Instagram. –CNET
To date, Facebook says it has pulled down around 12 million pieces of content of this type on Facebook and on Instagram, which it also owns. That’s a lot of censorship over a statistically irrelevant virus. But they are doubling down on the censorship. You do not have freedom of speech anymore and you don’t have the right to consume whatever information you decide is right for you. The tech giants and government has made the decision for everyone. Comply or be punished.
If this vaccine was so great, and the savior of humanity as it’s being portrayed, they wouldn’t have to try so hard to silence dissenters.
The United Kingdom said on Wednesday that it has approved the Pfizer vaccination for use and plans to start administering it next week.
Facebook said that in the UK it is working closely with the government and the NHS to support their communication plans when it comes to rolling out the vaccine. In the newsroom post, the company outlined the kind of material it expects to remove. –CNET
What a fancy way to say that the elitists, corporations, and the ruling class will work together to silence and censor the peasants and slaves into submission.
I wonder if Facebook and the governments of the world can “read between the lines” on our hands…
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-03--These Hypocritical Government Officials Want YOU to Stay Home While THEY Go Out and Party

These Hypocritical Government Officials Want YOU to Stay Home While THEY Go Out and Party Little is more annoying than seeing a wealthy government official solemnly telling you to stay home , forgo time with your family , and stop working while losing tons of money in missed wages .
Well , except for one thing .
It ’ s more annoying when that government official is telling you to hunker down while they ’ re out partying in one luxurious location or another .
I ’ d say that is far more annoying to watch those people tell us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not as I do.
” It reminds me of The Hunger Games , in which people at the Capitol enjoy frivolous pastimes while the peons in the other Districts must spend their days doing menial jobs to provide for the wealthy , lest they be beaten or killed by “ Peacekeepers.
” Here are some particularly egregious examples of hypocritical government officials who want you to sacrifice while they celebrate .
The list is by no means comprehensive .
Probably the most prominent example of a “ leader ” abandoning any pretense of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Newsom , who was spotted dining at a fancy restaurant – like $ 325 per person fancy – at a birthday party for a lobbyist .
Oh and also , his kids can go to school in person at their fancy private school , while everyone else ’ s kids are stuck with “ distance learning.
” Incidentally , the following night after Newsom got busted at French Laundry , San Francisco Mayor London Breed was caught at a birthday dinner there with 7 other people – right before she closed down dining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Steve Adler , the mayor of Austin , Texas , has been busted twice flouting his own restrictions .
First , he hosted 20 people at a wedding and reception for his daughter at a downtown Austin hotel .
The very next day , he took 7 other people in a private jet to his timeshare in Cabo San Lucas , Mexico .
The thing that makes this so richly ironic is that he addressed the people of Austin from Cabo on a Facebook video in which he said : Adler maintains that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his orders or those of the state ’ s governor .
However , the city recommended that people not gather in groups larger than 10 people , and also Adler himself asked people not to travel for Thanksgiving , saying , Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York was forced to change his plans after he announced on the radio , for Pete ’ s sake , that he was having his adult daughters and his 89-year-old mother visit his home in Albany for Thanksgiving .
Cuomo : Meanwhile , he was telling other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ My personal advice is , you don ’ t have family gatherings – even for Thanksgiving , ” the governor said as he listed off a number of smaller gatherings that have led to recent outbreaks across the state .
“ My personal advice is the best way to say ‘ I love you , ’ this Thanksgiving , the best way to say ‘ I ’ m thankful for you , ’ is to say , ‘ I love you so much , I ’ m so thankful for you , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you , and I don ’ t want to endanger our family and I don ’ t want to endanger our friends .
So we ’ ll celebrate virtually , ’ ” he added .
( source ) New Yorkers got the Emmy Award-winning governor ’ s mixed message loud and clear .
Mayor Muriel E. Bowser of Washington , DC ignored travel restrictions to go to Joe Biden ’ s victory party in Delaware , and then changed the rules for a mandatory 14-day quarantine established for peons upon her return .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the California legislature enjoyed a trip to Hawaii to attend a conference .
They rubbed elbows with lobbyists and special interest groups while in Hawaii .
The Los Angeles Times reports : Ironically , the conference began on the same day California reinstituted its strict “ purple level ” restrictions for citizens of the state that aren ’ t legislators or governors .
And that ’ s not all .
These are but a sprinkling of the hypocritical actions of those who claim to be leaders but are showing themselves to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Don ’ t forget about Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi ’ s infamous haircut , Chris Cuomo wandering around without a mask , Senator Diane Feinstein wandering around without a mask at both the Capitol building and Dulles International Airport , the mayor of San Jose dining with members of five other households , Dr. Fauci attending a baseball game with 2 guests and his mask pulled down in an otherwise empty stadium , and the “ fact ” that it ’ s okay to “ protest ” but not to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certainly no way to get people on board with dystopian restrictions .
The fact that these so-called leaders throw caution to the wind when it comes to the rules the rest of us are expected to follow certainly lends credence to those questioning whether the government is overstepping when it ’ s unnecessary .
What are some of the hypocritical things you ’ ve seen leaders do that the rest of us are not allowed to do during the Covid era ?

These Hypocritical Government Officials Want YOU to Stay Home While THEY Go Out and Party
Little is more annoying than seeing a wealthy government official solemnly telling you to stay home, forgo time with your family, and stop working while losing tons of money in missed wages.
Well, except for one thing. It’s more annoying when that government official is telling you to hunker down while they’re out partying in one luxurious location or another. I’d say that is far more annoying to watch those people tell us, “Do as I say, not as I do.”
It reminds me of The Hunger Games, in which people at the Capitol enjoy frivolous pastimes while the peons in the other Districts must spend their days doing menial jobs to provide for the wealthy, lest they be beaten or killed by “Peacekeepers.”
Here are some particularly egregious examples of hypocritical government officials who want you to sacrifice while they celebrate. The list is by no means comprehensive.
California Governor Gavin Newsom
Probably the most prominent example of a “leader” abandoning any pretense of following his rules is California Governor Gavin Newsom, who was spotted dining at a fancy restaurant – like $325 per person fancy – at a birthday party for a lobbyist.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) was photographed attending a dinner party at the French Laundry, one of the nation’s priciest restaurants, with a group of prominent lobbyists, including several who represent the California Medical Association. The photos show no one in the large party wearing a mask. Newsom apologized a few days later. “I want to apologize to you because I need to preach and practice, not just preach and not practice, and I’ve done my best to do that,” Newsom said. (source)
Oh and also, his kids can go to school in person at their fancy private school, while everyone else’s kids are stuck with “distance learning.”
Newsom is self-quarantining after a student at one of his children’s schools tested positive for the coronavirus — another sore spot for critics who are frustrated that most California students are not learning in person. “His kids can learn in person. But yours can’t. He can celebrate birthday parties. But you can’t,” San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer (R), a potential Newsom rival in 2022, wrote on Twitter. (source)
San Francisco Mayor London Breed
Incidentally, the following night after Newsom got busted at French Laundry, San Francisco Mayor London Breed was caught at a birthday dinner there with 7 other people – right before she closed down dining in every restaurant in San Francisco.
“I cannot emphasize enough how important it is that everyone act responsibly to reduce the spread of the virus,” Breed said in a statement Nov. 10. “Every San Franciscan needs to do their part so that we can start moving in the right direction again.”(source)
Austin Mayor Steve Adler
Steve Adler, the mayor of Austin, Texas, has been busted twice flouting his own restrictions. First, he hosted 20 people at a wedding and reception for his daughter at a downtown Austin hotel. The very next day, he took 7 other people in a private jet to his timeshare in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. The thing that makes this so richly ironic is that he addressed the people of Austin from Cabo on a Facebook video in which he said:
We need to stay home if you can. This is not the time to relax. We are going to be looking really closely. … We may have to close things down if we are not careful.” (source)
Adler maintains that neither the wedding nor the vacay broke his orders or those of the state’s governor.
However, the city recommended that people not gather in groups larger than 10 people, and also Adler himself asked people not to travel for Thanksgiving, saying,
“Everyday since March, I repeat that being home is the safest place for people to be,” Adler said in a statement Wednesday. “Only at our most trying moments, like around Thanksgiving, have I asked people not to travel as part of extra precautions. It is safest to stay home. However, we aren’t asking people to never venture out. We ask everyone to be as safe as possible when they do.” (source)
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo
Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York was forced to change his plans after he announced on the radio, for Pete’s sake, that he was having his adult daughters and his 89-year-old mother visit his home in Albany for Thanksgiving. Cuomo:
…went on WAMC radio and told of his own Thanksgiving plans, for all to hear, as CNN noted: “My mom is going to come up and two of my girls, is the current plan. But the plans change. I have a lot of work to do between now and Thanksgiving.” And then in this same interview, Cuomo scolded New Yorkers again to stay home and to stay in groups of fewer than 10. (source)
Meanwhile, he was telling other New Yorkers to skip Thanksgiving.
“My personal advice is, you don’t have family gatherings – even for Thanksgiving,” the governor said as he listed off a number of smaller gatherings that have led to recent outbreaks across the state. “My personal advice is the best way to say ‘I love you,’ this Thanksgiving, the best way to say ‘I’m thankful for you,’ is to say, ‘I love you so much, I’m so thankful for you, that I don’t want to endanger you, and I don’t want to endanger our family and I don’t want to endanger our friends. So we’ll celebrate virtually,’” he added. (source)
New Yorkers got the Emmy Award-winning governor’s mixed message loud and clear.
Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser
Mayor Muriel E. Bowser of Washington, DC ignored travel restrictions to go to Joe Biden’s victory party in Delaware, and then changed the rules for a mandatory 14-day quarantine established for peons upon her return. The Washington Post reports:
The trip, which comes as the mayor attempts to discourage interstate travel because of the pandemic, prompted questions from reporters and derision on social media from some residents and Bowser critics.
Bowser (D) said that she was “very proud” to attend the celebration in Wilmington and that the trip “absolutely” qualified as “essential travel” — which is exempted from the mayor’s quarantine order — because she was conducting government business on the road. “I do a lot of things to advance the interests of the District of Columbia. Some of them are formal and some of them are informal, but all of them are necessary,” she said… …Until last week, Bowser’s mayoral order on interstate travel would have required anyone who visited Delaware (and other states with more than 10 new daily coronavirus cases on average per 100,000 residents) to quarantine at home for two weeks upon returning to the District, except those whose travel was for essential purposes. Last week, however, Bowser replaced that order with a new one that went into effect Monday, after her trip. The new order got rid of the two-week, post-vacation quarantine that she had instituted in July. In its place, she ordered that people who wish to visit the District from high-risk states get a negative coronavirus test first (though the city will not check or enforce that requirement); residents who travel should quarantine at home — except for essential activities — until they get a negative test, generally at least three days after their trip. (source)
It’s certainly convenient to be able to rewrite the rules at your own convenience. Denver Mayor Michael Hancock Mayor Michael Hancock of Denver, Colorado tweeted a reminder for people to “Pass the potatoes, not COVID… Stay home as much as you can, especially if you’re sick… Host virtual gatherings instead of in-person dinners. Avoid travel, if you can.” He tweeted that minutes before boarding a plane to spend Thanksgiving with his own family members. Hancock then flew off to Houston, with a connecting flight to Meridian, Mississippi. His wife, Mary Louise Lee, was already there and they would be joining their 22-year-old daughter, Janae Hancock, for Thanksgiving… …Apart from the outrageous timing, Hancock’s hypocrisy becomes particularly egregious when you consider a Nov. 20 letter his office received from a Colorado county public health official warning that Denver International Airport (DIA) constitutes a serious COVID-19 hazard… …Despite the warning, Hancock headed for the airport on Thursday and passed through the Thanksgiving crowds, tweeting a warning about COVID-19. He told his constituents to stay home and then boarded a plane, undermining critical warnings while placing others at risk, by example and directly in person. He also stood a chance of passing along COVID with the potatoes to his wife and daughter. (source) It’s notable that in early November, Mayor Hancock humble-bragged that he wouldn’t be hosting his usual Thanksgiving dinner for 60 people at his home. Instead, he opted to fly across the country during a pandemic while telling everyone else to cancel their plans.
Members of the California Legislature
Several members of the California legislature enjoyed a trip to Hawaii to attend a conference.
Those attending include Republican Assembly members Heath Flora of Ripon and Jordan Cunningham of Paso Robles, Republican Sen. Andreas Borgeas of Modesto, Democratic Sen. Bill Dodd of Napa, Democratic Assembly members Blanca Rubio of Baldwin Park, Mike Gipson of Carson, Jose Medina of Riverside and Wendy Carrillo of Los Angeles, as well as Chad Mayes of Rancho Mirage, who won reelection this month as unaffiliated with any political party. (source)
They rubbed elbows with lobbyists and special interest groups while in Hawaii. The Los Angeles Times reports:
More than half a dozen California lawmakers are among the 50 people attending a policy conference sponsored by the Independent Voter Project, a nonprofit group, at the Fairmont Kea Lani Hotel in Wailea, with some legislators’ travel expenses picked up by the hosts. The four-day conference, at which panel participants discuss various issues including how to reopen states safely amid COVID-19, began Monday. The annual gathering, which has seen up to 25 California lawmakers in attendance in past years, has faced criticism because it is partly financed and attended by special interests, including businesses and labor groups, that lobby legislators. (source)
Ironically, the conference began on the same day California reinstituted its strict “purple level” restrictions for citizens of the state that aren’t legislators or governors.
And that’s not all.
These are but a sprinkling of the hypocritical actions of those who claim to be leaders but are showing themselves to be more along the lines of pampered despots.
Don’t forget about Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s infamous haircut, Chris Cuomo wandering around without a mask, Senator Diane Feinstein wandering around without a mask at both the Capitol building and Dulles International Airport, the mayor of San Jose dining with members of five other households, Dr. Fauci attending a baseball game with 2 guests and his mask pulled down in an otherwise empty stadium, and the “fact” that it’s okay to “protest” but not to go to church.
It’s certainly no way to get people on board with dystopian restrictions. The fact that these so-called leaders throw caution to the wind when it comes to the rules the rest of us are expected to follow certainly lends credence to those questioning whether the government is overstepping when it’s unnecessary.
What are some of the hypocritical things you’ve seen leaders do that the rest of us are not allowed to do during the Covid era?
Article posted with permission from Daisy Luther


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-03--Democrat Calls For Unity Are Disgusting

Democrat Calls For Unity Are Disgusting

As the reader may be aware , earlier this week Attorney General William Barr told the Associated Press that the Justice Department has not seen evidence of widespread vote fraud that would affect the outcome of the 2020 election .
According to Barr , most of the claims of fraud investigated have been “ very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct ” but “ are not systemic allegations.
” Leaving aside the potential for nefarious activity in between the lines of those utterances and the discouraging nature thereof , I ’ d like to point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to detract the credibility of his statements .
First off , if Barr is citing the actions of U.S. attorneys and FBI agents , and we have to take into account the deportment of these parties over the last several years .
How could Barr or anyone else presume that the same U.S. attorneys and FBI agents who have been conspiring with D.C. elites to oust President Trump over the last four years be trusted to investigate instances of vote fraud that might turn the tide in the president ’ s favor ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” election tampering being the sole qualification for vote fraud turning the election in Joe Biden ’ s favor preposterous in the extreme .
Barr said that instances of fraud were “ very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct ” rather than evidencing systemic orchestration .
Concluding that their impact could not have significantly influenced the election ’ s outcome sounds eerily similar to the assertions we once heard that “ there is no Mafia ” because law enforcement had not yet discovered the organizational structure of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rackets across the country .
The Deep State cabal made it plain long before November that it was prepared to do anything in its power to oust Trump , legal or otherwise .
As I ’ ve detailed more than once in this space , the previous administration and its surrogates spent a great deal of time and energy reinforcing their shadow government infrastructure .
This was evidenced in the mobilization of the foot soldiers we saw engaging in violent demonstrations this year , among other things .
Though we ’ re aware @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comedy , many have necessarily operated in the shadows .
The idea that they would leave a clear trail — paper or otherwise — evidencing their guilt in the area of vote fraud is just silly .
As we know , an unfortunate number of agencies ( including most news sources and many elected Republicans ) have adopted the narrative that the election was legitimate and that we ’ ll just have to get along with the incoming administration the best we can .
An increasing number of uninformed voters also appear to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the election in the vain hope of a return to some semblance of normality .
But the election ’ s outcome , such as it is , can not be accepted under any circumstances .
Commentator Mark Steyn articulated this extremely well earlier this week while guest hosting on Rush Limbaugh ’ s radio show .
He offered two assertions that ought to resonate with every reader : One , he said that shrugging our collective shoulders and “ accepting the lie ” ( of Biden ’ s victory ) is in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a constitutional republic .
Two , Republicans have been conceding hills on the field of battle to Democrats for decades , hoping for conciliation and bipartisanism .
Finally , he asked — and I ’ m paraphrasing — what hill are we willing to die on , then , if not one involving a stolen election ?
Indeed , in accepting a Biden win in this election , we will have entered a realm that we have never before occupied as a nation , institutionalized corruption .
Why vote if our elections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s taxes ?
Why obey the law if we are no longer a nation of laws ?
The danger relative to our entering these waters can not be overstated .
The recent entreaties of Joe Biden , his surrogates and prominent Democrats toward unity in the wake of this contentious election have engendered both laughter and disgust on the part of Trump supporters .
And this should not be at all surprising .
The principled individual does not reconcile with evil , and neither should we as a nation .

As the reader may be aware, earlier this week Attorney General William Barr told the Associated Press that the Justice Department has not seen evidence of widespread vote fraud that would affect the outcome of the 2020 election.
According to Barr, most of the claims of fraud investigated have been “very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct” but “are not systemic allegations.” Leaving aside the potential for nefarious activity in between the lines of those utterances and the discouraging nature thereof, I’d like to point out a couple of things that tend to detract the credibility of his statements.
First off, if Barr is citing the actions of U.S. attorneys and FBI agents, and we have to take into account the deportment of these parties over the last several years. How could Barr or anyone else presume that the same U.S. attorneys and FBI agents who have been conspiring with D.C. elites to oust President Trump over the last four years be trusted to investigate instances of vote fraud that might turn the tide in the president’s favor?
Second, I find that “systemic” election tampering being the sole qualification for vote fraud turning the election in Joe Biden’s favor preposterous in the extreme. Barr said that instances of fraud were “very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct” rather than evidencing systemic orchestration.
Concluding that their impact could not have significantly influenced the election’s outcome sounds eerily similar to the assertions we once heard that “there is no Mafia” because law enforcement had not yet discovered the organizational structure of the five Mafia families that were running billion-dollar rackets across the country.
The Deep State cabal made it plain long before November that it was prepared to do anything in its power to oust Trump, legal or otherwise. As I’ve detailed more than once in this space, the previous administration and its surrogates spent a great deal of time and energy reinforcing their shadow government infrastructure. This was evidenced in the mobilization of the foot soldiers we saw engaging in violent demonstrations this year, among other things.
Though we’re aware of some prominent players in this tragic comedy, many have necessarily operated in the shadows. The idea that they would leave a clear trail — paper or otherwise — evidencing their guilt in the area of vote fraud is just silly.
As we know, an unfortunate number of agencies (including most news sources and many elected Republicans) have adopted the narrative that the election was legitimate and that we’ll just have to get along with the incoming administration the best we can. An increasing number of uninformed voters also appear to be willing to accept the results of the election in the vain hope of a return to some semblance of normality. But the election’s outcome, such as it is, cannot be accepted under any circumstances.
Commentator Mark Steyn articulated this extremely well earlier this week while guest hosting on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show. He offered two assertions that ought to resonate with every reader: One, he said that shrugging our collective shoulders and “accepting the lie” (of Biden’s victory) is in the character of corrupt, totalitarian regimes, not a constitutional republic. Two, Republicans have been conceding hills on the field of battle to Democrats for decades, hoping for conciliation and bipartisanism. Finally, he asked — and I’m paraphrasing — what hill are we willing to die on, then, if not one involving a stolen election?
Indeed, in accepting a Biden win in this election, we will have entered a realm that we have never before occupied as a nation, institutionalized corruption. Why vote if our elections are rigged? Why pay one’s taxes? Why obey the law if we are no longer a nation of laws?
The danger relative to our entering these waters cannot be overstated. The recent entreaties of Joe Biden, his surrogates and prominent Democrats toward unity in the wake of this contentious election have engendered both laughter and disgust on the part of Trump supporters.
And this should not be at all surprising.
The principled individual does not reconcile with evil, and neither should we as a nation.
Article posted with permission from Erik Rush


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-03--Ryan Bundy:  The Feds Came For Our Family, Our Land, Our Water & Our Lives

Ryan Bundy : The Feds Came For Our Family , Our Land , Our Water & Our Lives In 2014 , The Bundy Ranch in Nevada became international news .
The federal government was called out on its unconstitutional land grabs , as well as exposed for its thuggery of citizens .
The Bundy family were surrounded by federal sniper agents as well as a small army who were hell bent on taking their land , their water rights and yes , even their very lives .
But patriots stood in the gap for them .
Ryan Bundy joins me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the people on what took place and how they stood against the tyranny of the federal government .
For more reports on Bundy Ranch .
For the story on Dr. James Redd I mentioned during this episode , check out the articles below .
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

Ryan Bundy: The Feds Came For Our Family, Our Land, Our Water & Our Lives
In 2014, The Bundy Ranch in Nevada became international news. The federal government was called out on its unconstitutional land grabs, as well as exposed for its thuggery of citizens. The Bundy family were surrounded by federal sniper agents as well as a small army who were hell bent on taking their land, their water rights and yes, even their very lives. But patriots stood in the gap for them. Ryan Bundy joins me in this episode to enlighten and educate the people on what took place and how they stood against the tyranny of the federal government.
For more reports on Bundy Ranch.
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/?s=bundy+ranch
For the story on Dr. James Redd I mentioned during this episode, check out the articles below.
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-04--New “COVID Vaccination Cards” Were Just Revealed To The Public

New “ COVID Vaccination Cards ” Were Just Revealed To The Public This is starting to get really frightening .
This week , the U.S. Department of Defense unveiled the very first images of the “ COVID-19 vaccination record cards ” that will be given to every person that gets one of the COVID-19 vaccines .
Now that such a record is going to be available , it is probably inevitable that some schools , businesses and government entities will want to start requiring people to provide “ proof of vaccination ” .
If this starts to happen , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
In addition , when someone receives a COVID-19 vaccine , that fact will be reported to state immunization registries and to the CDC .
So they will know exactly who has been vaccinated , and that will also know exactly who has not been vaccinated .
The Department of Defense is preparing to distribute millions of “ vaccination kits ” , and every single one of those kits contains a blank COVID-19 vaccination record card .
The following comes from CNN… Obviously , this has been the plan the entire time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this was coming until now .
And we are also being informed that every time someone gets vaccinated it will be reported directly to the appropriate state immunization registry… “ Everyone will be issued a written card that they can put in their wallet that will tell them what they had and when their next dose is due , ” Moore said .
“ Let ’ s do the simple , easy thing first .
Everyone ’ s going to get that.
” Vaccination clinics will also be reporting to their state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so that , for example , an entity could run a query if it didn ’ t know where a patient got a first dose .
So if you get injected , there will be a permanent record of that fact .
And if you don ’ t get injected , they will know that too .
In addition , CNN is also telling us that every single vaccination “ will be reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ” .
That means that there will be a centralized national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say , that should send a chill up your spine .
If someday government officials decide to crack down on those that have refused to get vaccinated , they will have all of the information that they need at their fingertips .
This is anti-American , and our “ conservative ” politicians in Washington should be fighting against this .
But so far , I haven ’ t heard a single one of them object to this plan .
Hopefully , that will change soon .
Meanwhile , politicians on the left continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Joe Biden just announced that he plans to ask every American to wear a mask for the first 100 days of his presidency… He says that it is “ just 100 days ” , but what if the numbers don ’ t go down by then ?
In California , Governor Gavin Newsom has revealed that regional “ stay-at-home ” orders are about to go into effect throughout much of the state… Of course , it is inevitable that these new lockdowns will destroy thousands of businesses and will cause the suicide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again , but Newsom doesn ’ t seem bothered by any of that .
Not to be outdone , Dr. Anthony Fauci actually wants to cancel Christmas .
He insists that it is way too dangerous for Americans to enjoy their usual celebrations , but he is hopeful that things will start to get back to normal in the future .
But for now , they are going to continue to try to scare us into radically changing our lifestyles .
In fact , Joe Biden just warned that another 250,000 Americans could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of January… No , that is not really going to happen .
The media has always accused President Trump of being loose with the truth , but so far they haven ’ t applied that same standard to Biden .
And they probably never will .
In any event , every American on the left and the right should be deeply concerned about these new vaccination cards .
I think soon we will start hearing about people that are not allowed on airplanes or that are fired from their jobs because they chose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ society is going to get completely nuts over COVID-19 , what is going to happen when a pandemic comes along that is so severe that it will make COVID-19 look like child ’ s play ?
If our politicians will instantly gravitate toward draconian measures during a relatively low level pandemic , how oppressive would they be during a pandemic in which people are literally dropping dead in the streets ?
Our freedoms have been eroding for decades , but now authorities are moving at lightning speed to take them away from us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a stand now , soon it will be too late to do so .

This is starting to get really frightening. This week, the U.S. Department of Defense unveiled the very first images of the “COVID-19 vaccination record cards” that will be given to every person that gets one of the COVID-19 vaccines. Now that such a record is going to be available, it is probably inevitable that some schools, businesses and government entities will want to start requiring people to provide “proof of vaccination”. If this starts to happen, the public needs to protest very loudly against it. In addition, when someone receives a COVID-19 vaccine, that fact will be reported to state immunization registries and to the CDC. So they will know exactly who has been vaccinated, and that will also know exactly who has not been vaccinated.
The Department of Defense is preparing to distribute millions of “vaccination kits”, and every single one of those kits contains a blank COVID-19 vaccination record card. The following comes from CNN…
The Department of Defense released the first images of a Covid-19 vaccination record card and vaccination kits Wednesday. Vaccination cards will be used as the “simplest” way to keep track of Covid-19 shots, said Dr. Kelly Moore, associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition, which is supporting frontline workers who will administer Covid-19 vaccinations.
Obviously, this has been the plan the entire time, but they never told the public that this was coming until now.
And we are also being informed that every time someone gets vaccinated it will be reported directly to the appropriate state immunization registry…
“Everyone will be issued a written card that they can put in their wallet that will tell them what they had and when their next dose is due,” Moore said. “Let’s do the simple, easy thing first. Everyone’s going to get that.” Vaccination clinics will also be reporting to their state immunization registries what vaccine was given, so that, for example, an entity could run a query if it didn’t know where a patient got a first dose.
So if you get injected, there will be a permanent record of that fact.
And if you don’t get injected, they will know that too.
In addition, CNN is also telling us that every single vaccination “will be reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”.
That means that there will be a centralized national registry for COVID vaccinations.
Needless to say, that should send a chill up your spine.
If someday government officials decide to crack down on those that have refused to get vaccinated, they will have all of the information that they need at their fingertips.
This is anti-American, and our “conservative” politicians in Washington should be fighting against this.
But so far, I haven’t heard a single one of them object to this plan. Hopefully, that will change soon.
Meanwhile, politicians on the left continue to push the envelope. For example, Joe Biden just announced that he plans to ask every American to wear a mask for the first 100 days of his presidency…
President-elect Joe Biden told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Thursday that he will ask Americans to wear masks for his first 100 days after he takes office, in a sign of how Biden’s approach to the virus will be dramatically different to President Donald Trump’s response. “Just 100 days to mask, not forever. 100 days. And I think we’ll see a significant reduction,” Biden told Tapper during his first joint interview with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris since winning the election.
He says that it is “just 100 days”, but what if the numbers don’t go down by then?
In California, Governor Gavin Newsom has revealed that regional “stay-at-home” orders are about to go into effect throughout much of the state…
California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday announced most of the state will come under a stricter set of limitations as intensive care units reach near-capacity levels with the latest pandemic surge in coronavirus cases. Regional stay-at-home orders will likely go into effect “in the next day or two” in places with less than 15% ICU availability, Newsom said in a daily briefing with reporters.
Of course, it is inevitable that these new lockdowns will destroy thousands of businesses and will cause the suicide rate in the state to shoot up again, but Newsom doesn’t seem bothered by any of that.
Not to be outdone, Dr. Anthony Fauci actually wants to cancel Christmas. He insists that it is way too dangerous for Americans to enjoy their usual celebrations, but he is hopeful that things will start to get back to normal in the future.
But for now, they are going to continue to try to scare us into radically changing our lifestyles. In fact, Joe Biden just warned that another 250,000 Americans could die from the virus by the end of January…
“I DON’T WANT TO SCARE ANYBODY here but understand the facts: we’re likely to lose another 250K people—dead, between now & January.”
No, that is not really going to happen.
The media has always accused President Trump of being loose with the truth, but so far they haven’t applied that same standard to Biden.
And they probably never will.
In any event, every American on the left and the right should be deeply concerned about these new vaccination cards. I think soon we will start hearing about people that are not allowed on airplanes or that are fired from their jobs because they chose not to be vaccinated.
If our society is going to get completely nuts over COVID-19, what is going to happen when a pandemic comes along that is so severe that it will make COVID-19 look like child’s play?
If our politicians will instantly gravitate toward draconian measures during a relatively low level pandemic, how oppressive would they be during a pandemic in which people are literally dropping dead in the streets?
Our freedoms have been eroding for decades, but now authorities are moving at lightning speed to take them away from us.
If we don’t take a stand now, soon it will be too late to do so.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-05--The CON Continues & Now “Conservatives” Are Calling For Martial Law

As the narrative falls apart on the CON , the united States is now also facing “ in our faces ” evidence of massive voter fraud .
However , instead of the people securing the ballot box through the use of the militia , they are getting behind a dangerous plan to impose martial law .
We ’ ll cover both of these in this episode .
Additional resources used in this episode , along with full videos in context in the montage .
As I expressed , that montage was altered , but there is no doubt that when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big picture , that is where all of this is going : a cashless society with either a microchip or something in a vaccine that will allow for tracking , buying and selling .
Just remember how they sold the people Socialist “ Social Security ” and said the ID number would never be used for identification .
Now , it ’ s the one thing you have to have for basically anything in the US .
The clip I played that I told you was altered but gave you the bigger picture @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The New England Journal of Medicine ’ s article titled “ Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era ” Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose .
So what do the MSM do ?
They ignore it REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS document concerning the Pfizer vaccine provided by Dr. Carrie Madej Dr. Madej also confirmed to me the following : Pfizer does not have aborted fetal cells .
Astra Zeneca does .
This is what I gleaned from Pfizer ’ s list so far… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stabilizing the vax as it is thawed from being cryofrozen… sodium phosphate dibasic- some are used as anticoagulants because PEG activates platelets /thrombosis- KCl used for voltage gated channels : biosensors when used with PEG/hydrogels NaCL used for paramagnetic particles ( biosensors ) - both lipid nano particles I believe act as the hydrogel … I will need to research this later .
It appears they will use biosensors for sure .
And Pfizer has used neongreen ( the equivalent of Luciferase ) in the production of its vax – there is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military , under Trump ’ s Operation Warp Speed , training to deliver the Pfizer vaccine .
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

As the narrative falls apart on the CON, the united States is now also facing “in our faces” evidence of massive voter fraud. However, instead of the people securing the ballot box through the use of the militia, they are getting behind a dangerous plan to impose martial law. We’ll cover both of these in this episode.
Additional resources used in this episode, along with full videos in context in the montage. As I expressed, that montage was altered, but there is no doubt that when one pulls back and looks at the big picture, that is where all of this is going: a cashless society with either a microchip or something in a vaccine that will allow for tracking, buying and selling. Just remember how they sold the people Socialist “Social Security” and said the ID number would never be used for identification. Now, it’s the one thing you have to have for basically anything in the US.
The clip I played that I told you was altered but gave you the bigger picture.
These are the original clips.
The New England Journal of Medicine’s article titled “Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era”
Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it
YouTube’s COVID-19 Medical Misinformation Policy
The Ghost Shield
REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS document concerning the Pfizer vaccine provided by Dr. Carrie Madej
Dr. Madej also confirmed to me the following:
Pfizer does not have aborted fetal cells. Astra Zeneca does. Pfizer’s ingredients are containing nanotechnology. This is what I gleaned from Pfizer’s list so far….
I believe the sucrose is for stabilizing the vax as it is thawed from being cryofrozen…
sodium phosphate dibasic- some are used as anticoagulants because PEG activates platelets /thrombosis-
KCl used for voltage gated channels: biosensors when used with PEG/hydrogels
NaCL used for paramagnetic particles (biosensors)-
both lipid nano particles I believe act as the hydrogel … I will need to research this later. It appears they will use biosensors for sure. And Pfizer has used neongreen (the equivalent of Luciferase ) in the production of its vax – there is a lawsuit over patent/copy infringement
Here is the military, under Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, training to deliver the Pfizer vaccine.
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-05--2020 Election: ‘Biggest Theft Since 1824’ – But It’s Even Worse Than That

Newt Gingrich tweeted Friday : “ The more data comes out on vote anomalies that clearly are not legitimate the more it looks like 2020 may be the biggest Presidential theft since Adams and Clay robbed Andrew Jackson in 1824 .
State legislatures should demand recounts.
” He was right , except for one detail : the stolen election of 2020 is shaping up to be much worse than that of 1824 .
Rating America ’ s Presidents explains that by that year , the Democratic-Republican Party , which was the party of the previous three presidents , Thomas Jefferson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , now included virtually every politician of significance and had split into factions of its own .
The congressional caucus that had chosen Jefferson , Madison , and Monroe bypassed the candidate whom many considered to be Monroe ’ s heir apparent , Secretary of State John Quincy Adams .
Instead , the caucus picked a candidate who stood for the old Republican principles of strict adherence to the Constitution and a weak federal government : William Crawford , who had been a senator from Georgia , minister to France , and secretary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Monroe administration .
The caucus , however , didn ’ t have the influence in 1824 that it had enjoyed in previous years .
Those who favored the positions that had initially been identified with the moribund opposition party , the Federalists , including a strong federal government that funded internal improvements , a centralized Bank of the United States , and high tariffs to protect American industry , were Adams and the speaker of the House , Henry Clay of Kentucky .
Then there was General Andrew Jackson , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the War of 1812 and , more recently , a senator from Tennessee .
Jackson had genuine popular support , which was increasingly important , as more and more states were choosing electors by popular vote .
No one , however , knew exactly where Jackson stood on the issues .
Adams , whom Jackson would soon count among his bitterest political enemies , actually supported him for vice president , albeit with a quip about Jackson ’ s volatile character : “ The Vice-Presidency was a station in which the General @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which he would need to quarrel with no one.
” One reason why 2020 is worse than 1824 is that everyone in that race , like everyone for the first century and a half of the republic , had an America-first agenda .
So there was nothing like the modern-day division of candidates on that score , and voters didn ’ t have to ask themselves which candidate was less likely to sell America ’ s interests to the highest international bidder .
What ’ s more , the positions that were truly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were distributed across factional lines ; the Adams party held some , and the Jackson party held others .
The gargantuan growth of the federal government today and its increasing interference in the daily lives of its citizens make one long for the era when politicians were determined not just to pay lip service to the idea of limiting its power .
One need not acquiesce in that unrestrained and continually growing power in order to accept the Supreme Court ’ s declaration of the constitutionality of using federal funds for internal improvements @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nor does this require one to endorse the later abuse of that clause .
The Bank placed control of the public funds in private hands , which was never wise , as it risked the possibility of an elected clique , rather than the people , setting the national agenda ; we are seeing the consequences of that in other contexts today .
The question of Andrew Jackson ’ s fitness for office was a key issue in 1824 , as it had been for no previous presidential candidate .
Jackson was widely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as he had little political experience .
Clay sneered , “ I can not believe that killing 2,500 Englishmen at New Orleans qualifies for the various , difficult , and complicated duties of the Chief Magistracy.
” Nevertheless , the election results had Jackson leading the field , winning ninety-nine electoral votes , with eighty-four for Adams , forty-one for Crawford , and thirty-seven for Clay .
As none of the candidates had a majority , the election went to the House of Representatives , where the choice was between the three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Adams , who prevailed .
Adams , as president , then chose Clay as the secretary of state , which was reasonable in light of their agreement on key issues .
But Jackson and his supporters charged Adams and Clay with making a “ corrupt bargain ” to secure the presidency for Adams .
Jackson raged : “ So you see the Judas of the West [ Clay ] has closed the contract and will receive his thirty pieces of silver .
Was there ever witnessed such bare-faced corruption in any country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presidency of John Quincy Adams , a man who was distinguished throughout his long political career for his integrity , was tainted from beginning to end by charges of corruption and venality .
Adams entered the White House under a cloud that never dissipated .
In his inaugural address , Adams appealed to the goodwill of the American people : “ Less possessed of your confidence in advance than any of my predecessors , I am deeply conscious of the prospect that I shall stand more and oftener in need of your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
His victory was so tainted that his presidency was effectively crippled from the start .
Of course , he didn ’ t have the weight of a complicit and compliant media and political establishment behind him .
Compared to Donald J. Trump , John Quincy Adams had it easy .

Newt Gingrich tweeted Friday: “The more data comes out on vote anomalies that clearly are not legitimate the more it looks like 2020 may be the biggest Presidential theft since Adams and Clay robbed Andrew Jackson in 1824. State legislatures should demand recounts.” He was right, except for one detail: the stolen election of 2020 is shaping up to be much worse than that of 1824.
Rating America’s Presidents explains that by that year, the Democratic-Republican Party, which was the party of the previous three presidents, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and James Monroe, now included virtually every politician of significance and had split into factions of its own. The congressional caucus that had chosen Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe bypassed the candidate whom many considered to be Monroe’s heir apparent, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams. Instead, the caucus picked a candidate who stood for the old Republican principles of strict adherence to the Constitution and a weak federal government: William Crawford, who had been a senator from Georgia, minister to France, and secretary of war and secretary of the treasury in the Monroe administration.
The caucus, however, didn’t have the influence in 1824 that it had enjoyed in previous years. Those who favored the positions that had initially been identified with the moribund opposition party, the Federalists, including a strong federal government that funded internal improvements, a centralized Bank of the United States, and high tariffs to protect American industry, were Adams and the speaker of the House, Henry Clay of Kentucky. Then there was General Andrew Jackson, the hero of the Battle of New Orleans in the War of 1812 and, more recently, a senator from Tennessee. Jackson had genuine popular support, which was increasingly important, as more and more states were choosing electors by popular vote.
No one, however, knew exactly where Jackson stood on the issues. Adams, whom Jackson would soon count among his bitterest political enemies, actually supported him for vice president, albeit with a quip about Jackson’s volatile character: “The Vice-Presidency was a station in which the General could hang no one, and in which he would need to quarrel with no one.”
One reason why 2020 is worse than 1824 is that everyone in that race, like everyone for the first century and a half of the republic, had an America-first agenda. So there was nothing like the modern-day division of candidates on that score, and voters didn’t have to ask themselves which candidate was less likely to sell America’s interests to the highest international bidder.
What’s more, the positions that were truly best for America in the long run were distributed across factional lines; the Adams party held some, and the Jackson party held others. The gargantuan growth of the federal government today and its increasing interference in the daily lives of its citizens make one long for the era when politicians were determined not just to pay lip service to the idea of limiting its power. One need not acquiesce in that unrestrained and continually growing power in order to accept the Supreme Court’s declaration of the constitutionality of using federal funds for internal improvements as based on the Commerce Clause; nor does this require one to endorse the later abuse of that clause. The Bank placed control of the public funds in private hands, which was never wise, as it risked the possibility of an elected clique, rather than the people, setting the national agenda; we are seeing the consequences of that in other contexts today.
The question of Andrew Jackson’s fitness for office was a key issue in 1824, as it had been for no previous presidential candidate. Jackson was widely considered to be unsuitable to be president, as he had little political experience. Clay sneered, “I cannot believe that killing 2,500 Englishmen at New Orleans qualifies for the various, difficult, and complicated duties of the Chief Magistracy.”
Nevertheless, the election results had Jackson leading the field, winning ninety-nine electoral votes, with eighty-four for Adams, forty-one for Crawford, and thirty-seven for Clay. As none of the candidates had a majority, the election went to the House of Representatives, where the choice was between the three top vote-getters. Clay threw his support to Adams, who prevailed. Adams, as president, then chose Clay as the secretary of state, which was reasonable in light of their agreement on key issues. But Jackson and his supporters charged Adams and Clay with making a “corrupt bargain” to secure the presidency for Adams. Jackson raged: “So you see the Judas of the West [Clay] has closed the contract and will receive his thirty pieces of silver. Was there ever witnessed such bare-faced corruption in any country before?”
So it was that the presidency of John Quincy Adams, a man who was distinguished throughout his long political career for his integrity, was tainted from beginning to end by charges of corruption and venality. Adams entered the White House under a cloud that never dissipated. In his inaugural address, Adams appealed to the goodwill of the American people: “Less possessed of your confidence in advance than any of my predecessors, I am deeply conscious of the prospect that I shall stand more and oftener in need of your indulgence.”
He didn’t get it. His victory was so tainted that his presidency was effectively crippled from the start. Of course, he didn’t have the weight of a complicit and compliant media and political establishment behind him. Compared to Donald J. Trump, John Quincy Adams had it easy.
Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-05--Can Employers Fire Any Employees That Choose Not To Take The COVID Vaccine?

Can Employers Fire Any Employees That Choose Not To Take The COVID Vaccine ?
Editor ’ s Note : The law should be applied in this situation , such as the protection of the Fourth Amendment and the “ right of the people to be secure in their persons , … ” Of course , that is “ against unreasonable searches and seizures , ” But honestly , since no crime has been committed , what authority does the state have in being invasive of your body ?
If they don ’ t have that authority , how then can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such a thing of employees ?
Furthermore , how can they do it when there are clear exemptions , understood in the protections of the First Amendment concerning rights such as those that provide for the “ free exercise ” of religious beliefs ?
We ’ ve covered that law , which applies to not only employees but customers also in the article linked here .
However , make no mistake that when devils get it in their mind they think they can do something , the people must remember that they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place and resist their tyranny .
A COVID vaccine is not even available yet , but the mainstream media is already full of stories about whether or not it is legal for employers to fire employees that refuse to take it .
To me , this is not even a debate that we should be having .
It would be fundamentally anti-American and morally reprehensible for any employer to fire someone for choosing not to get vaccinated .
Unfortunately , the mainstream media does not see things that way , and they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assuring employers that it is perfectly legal to fire people that don ’ t want to get vaccinated .
For example , the following comes from a CNBC article… If religious convictions really did protect employees , that would be great .
From my perspective , any employee that refuses to get vaccinated based on a sincerely held religious conviction should definitely be shielded from being fired under federal law .
Unfortunately , the CNBC article goes on to explain why federal law is probably not going to protect any person of faith @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , under federal law there is hardly any protection at all for workers that wish to refuse the COVID vaccine .
Other major news outlets have been publishing similar stories .
This excerpt comes from a piece that was published by Reuters… It is almost as if there is a coordinated effort to make employers across the country aware that they can issue such mandates .
A little over a decade ago , the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ruled that employers could make vaccines mandatory during the swing flu pandemic , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rapidly and so very few employers actually went in that direction .
But now it appears that COVID-19 is going to be with us for quite a while , and some employers have already decided that they are going to make vaccination mandatory for all employees… Just a few months into the coronavirus pandemic , Holly Smith had already made up her mind .
She was not going to reopen her restaurant to diners until there was a vaccine .
She just didn ’ t think it was safe .
When she shared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked : Would the vaccine be mandatory ?
Yes , she said .
It would be .
“ I ’ m not going to open until I can indeed be sure that everyone on my staff is vaccinated , ” says Smith , chef and owner of Cafe Juanita in Kirkland , Wash. “ The immediate people on the team — you ’ ve got to take care of them .
If you don ’ t take care of them , they can not help you take care of business.
” If some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take the vaccine , they will be hitting the bricks .
And as I have detailed repeatedly in recent weeks , it is not easy to find another job in this economy .
The good news is that most employers will likely be hesitant to mandate vaccines because of the potential of pushback from their employees .
According to a recent Gallup survey , 42 percent of all Americans do not plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine… It is estimated that there are 328 million people living in the United States right now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is 137 million .
If those 137 million people stand up for their God-given rights , we almost certainly will not see widespread vaccine mandates .
But will they ?
We shall see .
In the months ahead , there is going to be so much public pressure to get vaccinated , and the CDC plans to aggressively promote their vaccination campaign .
They even plan to distribute “ buttons or stickers ” so that people that have been injected can advertise that fact to others… In addition , within the past few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Bill Clinton and Joe Biden have all committed to being vaccinated publicly… That would seem to be quite a public relations coup for the pharmaceutical companies , but if any of them has any sort of an adverse reaction to the vaccine it will rapidly transform into a public relations nightmare .
Of course , the truth is that nobody really knows what the long-term side effects of taking COVID vaccines will be for the population as a whole .
As I have discussed previously , this entirely new class of mRNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and those that line up first to get a COVID vaccine will be the guinea pigs .

Can Employers Fire Any Employees That Choose Not To Take The COVID Vaccine?
Editor’s Note: The law should be applied in this situation, such as the protection of the Fourth Amendment and the “right of the people to be secure in their persons,…” Of course, that is “against unreasonable searches and seizures,” But honestly, since no crime has been committed, what authority does the state have in being invasive of your body? If they don’t have that authority, how then can they stand with corporations or businesses demanding such a thing of employees? Furthermore, how can they do it when there are clear exemptions, understood in the protections of the First Amendment concerning rights such as those that provide for the “free exercise” of religious beliefs? We’ve covered that law, which applies to not only employees but customers also in the article linked here. However, make no mistake that when devils get it in their mind they think they can do something, the people must remember that they have the duty to put them in their place and resist their tyranny.
A COVID vaccine is not even available yet, but the mainstream media is already full of stories about whether or not it is legal for employers to fire employees that refuse to take it. To me, this is not even a debate that we should be having. It would be fundamentally anti-American and morally reprehensible for any employer to fire someone for choosing not to get vaccinated. Unfortunately, the mainstream media does not see things that way, and they are interviewing lots of legal experts that are assuring employers that it is perfectly legal to fire people that don’t want to get vaccinated. For example, the following comes from a CNBC article…
“In general, yes, employers are able to mandate the vaccine when it becomes available with, of course, a bunch of caveats,” says employment lawyer Lindsay Ryan, listing possible exemptions for those with specific medical conditions and those with sincerely held religious convictions.
If religious convictions really did protect employees, that would be great.
From my perspective, any employee that refuses to get vaccinated based on a sincerely held religious conviction should definitely be shielded from being fired under federal law.
Unfortunately, the CNBC article goes on to explain why federal law is probably not going to protect any person of faith from mandatory vaccination requirements…
Ryan emphasizes that state laws regulating what constitutes reasonable accommodations for religious groups vary significantly, but that “under federal law, employers don’t have to grant a religious accommodation if doing so would result in more than a de minimis cost to the operation of the business.” “De minimis” is Latin for “of minimum importance” and is used in law to refer to a total so small that it is not even recognized. Given how significantly the pandemic has impacted businesses, Ryan says “this is a pretty low standard.” Meaning, many employers will likely have legal ground to require vaccination.
In other words, under federal law there is hardly any protection at all for workers that wish to refuse the COVID vaccine.
Other major news outlets have been publishing similar stories. This excerpt comes from a piece that was published by Reuters…
Gostin and five other health law experts said private companies in the United States have broad liberties to set health and safety standards, which would allow them to mandate vaccinations as a condition of employment with some exceptions.
It is almost as if there is a coordinated effort to make employers across the country aware that they can issue such mandates.
A little over a decade ago, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ruled that employers could make vaccines mandatory during the swing flu pandemic, but of course that crisis faded rather rapidly and so very few employers actually went in that direction.
But now it appears that COVID-19 is going to be with us for quite a while, and some employers have already decided that they are going to make vaccination mandatory for all employees…
Just a few months into the coronavirus pandemic, Holly Smith had already made up her mind. She was not going to reopen her restaurant to diners until there was a vaccine. She just didn’t think it was safe. When she shared the decision with her staff, they asked: Would the vaccine be mandatory? Yes, she said. It would be. “I’m not going to open until I can indeed be sure that everyone on my staff is vaccinated,” says Smith, chef and owner of Cafe Juanita in Kirkland, Wash. “The immediate people on the team — you’ve got to take care of them. If you don’t take care of them, they cannot help you take care of business.”
If some of her employees do not want to take the vaccine, they will be hitting the bricks.
And as I have detailed repeatedly in recent weeks, it is not easy to find another job in this economy.
The good news is that most employers will likely be hesitant to mandate vaccines because of the potential of pushback from their employees. According to a recent Gallup survey, 42 percent of all Americans do not plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine…
Americans’ willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19 rebounded a bit in October, as seen in Gallup polling conducted before Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna made promising announcements about the likely effectiveness of their coronavirus vaccines. Fifty-eight percent of Americans in the latest poll say they would get a COVID-19 vaccine, up from a low of 50% in September.
It is estimated that there are 328 million people living in the United States right now, and 42 percent of 328 million is 137 million.
If those 137 million people stand up for their God-given rights, we almost certainly will not see widespread vaccine mandates.
But will they?
We shall see.
In the months ahead, there is going to be so much public pressure to get vaccinated, and the CDC plans to aggressively promote their vaccination campaign.
They even plan to distribute “buttons or stickers” so that people that have been injected can advertise that fact to others…
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is planning to offer health care providers a template they can use to print buttons or stickers that would advertise a person’s vaccination status. The idea is that the button would be handed out to patients after they receive their vaccination shots. The effort is part of a “toolkit” that the CDC plans to provide healthcare systems to “educate and promote vaccination,” a CDC spokesperson told ABC News.
In addition, within the past few days Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and Joe Biden have all committed to being vaccinated publicly…
President-elect Joe Biden said he would publicly take a vaccine when it’s available to encourage the public to get vaccinated, joining three former presidents who recently pledged to do the same. Biden said he’d “be happy” to join former Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton in getting the vaccine in public to prove it is safe.
That would seem to be quite a public relations coup for the pharmaceutical companies, but if any of them has any sort of an adverse reaction to the vaccine it will rapidly transform into a public relations nightmare.
Of course, the truth is that nobody really knows what the long-term side effects of taking COVID vaccines will be for the population as a whole.
As I have discussed previously, this entirely new class of mRNA vaccines has never been tried before, and those that line up first to get a COVID vaccine will be the guinea pigs.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-05--New “COVID Vaccination Cards” Were Just Revealed To The Public

This is starting to get really frightening .
This week , the U.S. Department of Defense unveiled the very first images of the “ COVID-19 vaccination record cards ” that will be given to every person that gets one of the COVID-19 vaccines .
Now that such a record is going to be available , it is probably inevitable that some schools , businesses and government entities will want to start requiring people to provide “ proof of vaccination ” .
If this starts to happen , the public needs to protest very loudly against it .
In addition , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that fact will be reported to state immunization registries and to the CDC .
So they will know exactly who has been vaccinated , and that will also know exactly who has not been vaccinated .
The Department of Defense is preparing to distribute millions of “ vaccination kits ” , and every single one of those kits contains a blank COVID-19 vaccination record card .
The following comes from CNN… Obviously , this has been the plan the entire time , but they never told the public that this was coming until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ informed that every time someone gets vaccinated it will be reported directly to the appropriate state immunization registry… “ Everyone will be issued a written card that they can put in their wallet that will tell them what they had and when their next dose is due , ” Moore said .
“ Let ’ s do the simple , easy thing first .
Everyone ’ s going to get that.
” Vaccination clinics will also be reporting to their state immunization registries what vaccine was given , so that , for example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if it didn ’ t know where a patient got a first dose .
So if you get injected , there will be a permanent record of that fact .
And if you don ’ t get injected , they will know that too .
In addition , CNN is also telling us that every single vaccination “ will be reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ” .
That means that there will be a centralized national registry for COVID vaccinations .
Needless to say , that should send @ @ @ @ @ @ @ someday government officials decide to crack down on those that have refused to get vaccinated , they will have all of the information that they need at their fingertips .
This is anti-American , and our “ conservative ” politicians in Washington should be fighting against this .
But so far , I haven ’ t heard a single one of them object to this plan .
Hopefully , that will change soon .
Meanwhile , politicians on the left continue to push the envelope .
For example , Joe Biden just announced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to wear a mask for the first 100 days of his presidency… He says that it is “ just 100 days ” , but what if the numbers don ’ t go down by then ?
In California , Governor Gavin Newsom has revealed that regional “ stay-at-home ” orders are about to go into effect throughout much of the state… Of course , it is inevitable that these new lockdowns will destroy thousands of businesses and will cause the suicide rate in the state to shoot up again , but Newsom doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that .
Not to be outdone , Dr. Anthony Fauci actually wants to cancel Christmas .
He insists that it is way too dangerous for Americans to enjoy their usual celebrations , but he is hopeful that things will start to get back to normal in the future .
But for now , they are going to continue to try to scare us into radically changing our lifestyles .
In fact , Joe Biden just warned that another 250,000 Americans could die from the virus by the end of January… No , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The media has always accused President Trump of being loose with the truth , but so far they haven ’ t applied that same standard to Biden .
And they probably never will .
In any event , every American on the left and the right should be deeply concerned about these new vaccination cards .
I think soon we will start hearing about people that are not allowed on airplanes or that are fired from their jobs because they chose not to be vaccinated .
If our society is going to get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to happen when a pandemic comes along that is so severe that it will make COVID-19 look like child ’ s play ?
If our politicians will instantly gravitate toward draconian measures during a relatively low level pandemic , how oppressive would they be during a pandemic in which people are literally dropping dead in the streets ?
Our freedoms have been eroding for decades , but now authorities are moving at lightning speed to take them away from us .
If we don ’ t take a stand now , soon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so .