thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-26--Former FDA Commissioner Promotes Social Engineering:  The Goal Should Be To Make Masks A Social & Cu

Former FDA Commissioner Promotes Social Engineering:  The Goal Should Be To Make Masks A Social & Cultural Norm

The ruling class is attempting to change the behavior of the public using social engineering .
There ’ s an effort to get people symbolically muzzled by any means necessary with “ the goal ” of making masks a social and cultural norm .
Many tyrants are calling for a face mask mandate .
A former commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration says it may be time for a national mask mandate .
In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal , Dr. Scott Gottlieb wrote the mandate could be “ limited and temporary.
” “ A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next two months , ” Gottlieb wrote , adding that it ’ s easier to wear a mask in the winter than the summer .
“ The inconvenience would allow the country to preserve health-care capacity and keep more schools and businesses open.
” “ States should be able to choose how to enforce a mandate , but the goal should be to make masks a social and cultural norm , not a political statement , ” he wrote .
“ Mandating masks has become divisive only because it was framed that way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agrees with head medical tyrant Dr. Anthony Fauci that the ritualistic shame muzzle should be forced on everyone .
Dr. Fauci Warns of Winter Once Again : “ I Think We ’ re Facing a Whole Lot of Trouble ” “ If people are not wearing masks , then maybe we should be mandating it , ” Dr. Anthony Fauci , director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , told CNN ’ s Erin Burnett on Friday .
Brace yourselves for the possibility of another lockdown .
“ We ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now , ” Gottlieb told Margaret Brennan Sunday on CBS ‘ s ‘ Face the Nation.
’ “ We ’ re entering what ’ s going to be the steep slope of the curve , of the epidemic curve.
” The most alarming part of all of this is the attempts to engineer a massive disconnect that they want between families .
In Maryland , the governor said this week ’ s family gatherings were the No .
1 source of transmission in the state , followed by house parties .
In North @ @ @ @ @ @ @ daily case count Friday and said they continue to see clusters “ from social and religious gatherings .
”

The ruling class is attempting to change the behavior of the public using social engineering. There’s an effort to get people symbolically muzzled by any means necessary with “the goal” of making masks a social and cultural norm.
Many tyrants are calling for a face mask mandate. A former commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration says it may be time for a national mask mandate. In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Dr. Scott Gottlieb wrote the mandate could be “limited and temporary.”
Are Face Masks & COVID Rituals Occultist Symbols For Submission?
“A mandate can be expressly limited to the next two months,” Gottlieb wrote, adding that it’s easier to wear a mask in the winter than the summer. “The inconvenience would allow the country to preserve health-care capacity and keep more schools and businesses open.”
“States should be able to choose how to enforce a mandate, but the goal should be to make masks a social and cultural norm, not a political statement,” he wrote. “Mandating masks has become divisive only because it was framed that way by some politicians and commentators.” Gottlieb agrees with head medical tyrant Dr. Anthony Fauci that the ritualistic shame muzzle should be forced on everyone.
Dr. Fauci Warns of Winter Once Again: “I Think We’re Facing a Whole Lot of Trouble”
“If people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told CNN’s Erin Burnett on Friday.
Brace yourselves for the possibility of another lockdown. “We’re at a dangerous tipping point right now,” Gottlieb told Margaret Brennan Sunday on CBS‘s ‘Face the Nation.’ “We’re entering what’s going to be the steep slope of the curve, of the epidemic curve.”
The most alarming part of all of this is the attempts to engineer a massive disconnect that they want between families. In Maryland, the governor said this week’s family gatherings were the No. 1 source of transmission in the state, followed by house parties. In North Carolina, health officials reported its highest daily case count Friday and said they continue to see clusters “from social and religious gatherings.”
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-26--How Big Tech Censorship Made the Hunter Biden Story Huge

Elections are messy .
As the day of any election gets closer , more stories are leaked as opponents and muckraking journalists try to hurt the opposition ’ s campaign .
This process can be ugly—just ask John Adams and Thomas Jefferson—but it plays an important role in informing voters .
It was on display just a few weeks ago , when President Trump ’ s tax returns were leaked and published .
Similarly , a blockbuster report from the New York Post this week asserted that Joe Biden ’ s son , Hunter Biden , introduced business contacts to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set-up .
The Post reported on “ a message of appreciation that Vadym Pozharskyi , an adviser to the board of Burisma , allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April 17 , 2015 , about a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board at a reported salary of up to $ 50,000 a month.
” It also reported on salacious images of Hunter Biden using drugs and engaging in sexually explicit acts .
The report has been contested , declared false by the Biden campaign , and challenged by left-leaning media outlets .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has cast doubt on the authenticity of the emails and the claim that Biden ever met with Pozharskyi .
Does any of this matter ?
Are the allegations legitimate ?
It should be up to voters to weigh conflicting reports and decide for themselves .
But instead , Silicon Valley tech wizards decided to throttle and ban the Post story , which they presumptively and unilaterally declared “ misinformation , ” across their massive platforms .
Facebook used its algorithm to try and limit the story ’ s reach , while Twitter took @ @ @ @ @ @ @ locked the New York Post ’ s Twitter account and even banned the president ’ s press secretary for sharing the story .
Journalists who shared the link awoke to find their accounts suspended .
The company claimed the article violated its policy on spreading “ hacked content , ” even though it is not proven that it stems from hacking—and this policy is rarely applied to other big stories .
Twitter even limited the ability of users to link to the story and attached a “ dangerous content ” warning to existing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free flow of journalism by Big Tech companies is concerning , and represents a rather transparent attempt to protect the Biden campaign .
After all , data do show that employees at tech giants overwhelmingly skew Democrat in their political donations .
Yes , it ’ s true that Facebook and Twitter are private companies , and have the legal right to limit content on their platform .
The First Amendment does not apply to them .
But their decision to do so is still morally wrong and counterproductive .
The American political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information .
It ’ s important that voters can share , debate , and contest information freely , and not have to navigate a web of censorship on the main mediums we ’ ve come to rely on in order to do so .
Facebook and Twitter ’ s efforts were also counterproductive .
Their attempted crackdown totally , woefully failed .
The story about alleged corruption in the Biden family was initially making something of a splash , but wasn ’ t totally dominating the news .
Yet once Big Tech tried @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It became the prime topic of discussion on cable news , and the censorship itself trended on Twitter , calling much more attention to the story than before .
It prompted top lawmakers like Sens .
Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley to speak out publicly and draw even more attention to the story .
Even on Facebook itself , stories about the story ’ s censorship were so widely shared that they dominated the website ’ s rankings .
So , if you wanted to keep the story about Hunter Biden quiet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the worst possible way to do it .
Wanna-be censors everywhere should take note .
In what ’ s been coined the “ Streisand Effect , ” censoring something , especially in the age of the internet , often has the inverse effect of drawing exponentially more attention to it .
Here ’ s how Psychology Today explains this phenomenon : “ In 2003 , a picture of Barbra Streisand ’ s beachfront home hit the web as part of a public collection of images displaying coastal erosion .
In response , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for $ 50 million for invasion of privacy , claiming violation of a state law aimed at the telephoto lenses of paparazzi .
Ironically , the media attention surrounding the lawsuit made the photo of her house go viral ( at least in 2003 terms ) .
In the month before the lawsuit , the picture had been downloaded only six times , including twice by her lawyers—whereas the image was downloaded more than 420,000 times during the month following the lawsuit .
This paradoxical result—where an attempt to silence , suppress , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effect.
” The takeaway here is clear .
Sunlight , not censorship , is the best antidote for bad ideas and bad information .
So , Big Tech should rethink its misguided move toward political censorship , and embrace its original role as providing platforms for the free flow of information .
Voters are smart enough to decide for themselves .
Any more major attempts by Silicon Valley to force narratives down from up above will only backfire spectacularly .
If Facebook and Twitter keep it up , free-speech competitors like Parler will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushback , not heavy-handed government regulation , are how we will preserve a free and open internet .
Brad Polumbo is a journalist and the Eugene S. Thorpe Writing Fellow at the Foundation for Economic Education .
See article at fee.org .
Published with permission .
The Language of Liberty series is an outreach project of Center for Self Governance to educate citizens in the principles of liberty .
The views expressed by authors are their own and may not reflect the views of CSG .

Elections are messy. As the day of any election gets closer, more stories are leaked as opponents and muckraking journalists try to hurt the opposition’s campaign. This process can be ugly—just ask John Adams and Thomas Jefferson—but it plays an important role in informing voters. It was on display just a few weeks ago, when President Trump’s tax returns were leaked and published.
Similarly, a blockbuster report from the New York Post this week asserted that Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, introduced business contacts to his father in an allegedly improper pay-for-influence set-up. The Post reported on “a message of appreciation that Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to the board of Burisma, allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015, about a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board at a reported salary of up to $50,000 a month.” It also reported on salacious images of Hunter Biden using drugs and engaging in sexually explicit acts.
The report has been contested, declared false by the Biden campaign, and challenged by left-leaning media outlets. The Washington Post fact-checker, for example, has cast doubt on the authenticity of the emails and the claim that Biden ever met with Pozharskyi.
Does any of this matter? Are the allegations legitimate? It should be up to voters to weigh conflicting reports and decide for themselves.
But instead, Silicon Valley tech wizards decided to throttle and ban the Post story, which they presumptively and unilaterally declared “misinformation,” across their massive platforms. Facebook used its algorithm to try and limit the story’s reach, while Twitter took it several steps further.
Twitter actually locked the New York Post’s Twitter account and even banned the president’s press secretary for sharing the story. Journalists who shared the link awoke to find their accounts suspended. The company claimed the article violated its policy on spreading “hacked content,” even though it is not proven that it stems from hacking—and this policy is rarely applied to other big stories.
Twitter even limited the ability of users to link to the story and attached a “dangerous content” warning to existing links. This unprecedented restriction on the free flow of journalism by Big Tech companies is concerning, and represents a rather transparent attempt to protect the Biden campaign. After all, data do show that employees at tech giants overwhelmingly skew Democrat in their political donations.
Yes, it’s true that Facebook and Twitter are private companies, and have the legal right to limit content on their platform. The First Amendment does not apply to them. But their decision to do so is still morally wrong and counterproductive.
The American political system depends on the free flow of information. It’s important that voters can share, debate, and contest information freely, and not have to navigate a web of censorship on the main mediums we’ve come to rely on in order to do so.
Facebook and Twitter’s efforts were also counterproductive. Their attempted crackdown totally, woefully failed.
The story about alleged corruption in the Biden family was initially making something of a splash, but wasn’t totally dominating the news. Yet once Big Tech tried to censor it, the report exploded.
It became the prime topic of discussion on cable news, and the censorship itself trended on Twitter, calling much more attention to the story than before. It prompted top lawmakers like Sens. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley to speak out publicly and draw even more attention to the story.
Even on Facebook itself, stories about the story’s censorship were so widely shared that they dominated the website’s rankings. So, if you wanted to keep the story about Hunter Biden quiet, well, this was just about the worst possible way to do it.
Wanna-be censors everywhere should take note. In what’s been coined the “Streisand Effect,” censoring something, especially in the age of the internet, often has the inverse effect of drawing exponentially more attention to it.
Here’s how Psychology Today explains this phenomenon: “In 2003, a picture of Barbra Streisand’s beachfront home hit the web as part of a public collection of images displaying coastal erosion. In response, in February 2003, Streisand sued the photographer for $50 million for invasion of privacy, claiming violation of a state law aimed at the telephoto lenses of paparazzi.
Ironically, the media attention surrounding the lawsuit made the photo of her house go viral (at least in 2003 terms). In the month before the lawsuit, the picture had been downloaded only six times, including twice by her lawyers—whereas the image was downloaded more than 420,000 times during the month following the lawsuit. This paradoxical result—where an attempt to silence, suppress, or stop something backfires—was dubbed the Streisand effect.”
The takeaway here is clear. Sunlight, not censorship, is the best antidote for bad ideas and bad information.
So, Big Tech should rethink its misguided move toward political censorship, and embrace its original role as providing platforms for the free flow of information. Voters are smart enough to decide for themselves.
Any more major attempts by Silicon Valley to force narratives down from up above will only backfire spectacularly. If Facebook and Twitter keep it up, free-speech competitors like Parler will continue to grow. Competition and consumer pushback, not heavy-handed government regulation, are how we will preserve a free and open internet.
Brad Polumbo is a journalist and the Eugene S. Thorpe Writing Fellow at the Foundation for Economic Education. See article at fee.org. Published with permission.
The Language of Liberty series is an outreach project of Center for Self Governance to educate citizens in the principles of liberty. The views expressed by authors are their own and may not reflect the views of CSG.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-26--Maryland:  Cop Caught In The Act Of Raping A Minor Gets Massive 400 Month Prison Sentence

Baltimore , MD — As TFTP reports on a regular basis , police officers , as well as child predators in the civilian world , often escape accountability despite horrifying crimes against children .
A former officer from Baltimore was about to be one of these statistics last October after the prosecutors declined to prosecute him for the rape of a 13-year-old girl .
The ex-cop ’ s desire to prey on children was so strong , however , that he would be caught multiple times and receive a massive sentence as a result .
Former Baltimore County corrections officer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , was handed down a massive 400-month sentence in federal prison after being caught in the rape of at least two children and the production of child pornography .
As the Baltimore Sun reported , Mannion was originally charged with raping a 13-year-old in May 2019 , but circuit court prosecutors declined to prosecute him on rape charges less than two weeks after the federal child porn indictment was filed in October 2019 , court records show .
“ Thomas Mannion is a predator and our children and communities are safer because he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in federal prison , ” said U.S. Attorney Robert K. Hur in a news release .
“ We are grateful for the collaboration of our law enforcement partners to remove this sexual predator from the community so he can no longer victimize our children.
” Last year , Mannion , who rented an apartment in Baltimore , was seen by his neighbor luring a 13-year-old girl into his home .
On May 6 , 2019 , Mannion was arrested after his neighbor reported to police that they saw him in bed with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found that Mannion had groomed the girl from a conversation on Grindr , a dating app targeted at members of the LGBTQ community .
When they searched his phone and computer , police found a trove of illicit video and images of the child .
They also found images of a 14-year-old boy who Mannion later admitted to luring through Grindr as well .
As the Sun points out , in a plea agreement , Mannion said he met with several other minors who he found on the same dating even after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discussed his sexual interest in children that he knew or had contact with while talking with users of the application .
According to the Justice Department , Mannion ’ s case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood , a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse .
The 400-month or 33-year sentence is certainly encouraging considering the sheer number of police officers and other child predators who commit unspeakable crimes against children only to receive wrist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earlier this month , TFTP reported on the case of former Honolulu police officer Kramer Aoki who was sentenced for his crimes against a 17-year-old girl .
During a traffic stop , Aoki abused his power and sexually assaulted the teenage girl in his custody .
For sexually assaulting an underage girl while on duty , Aoki faced a maximum sentence of five years .
While five years is still fairly low for his crimes , what he actually received was disgusting .
Aoki will serve just 14 days in jail , will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offender , and if he abides by the terms of his plea agreement , the charge will be wiped from his record .
Hopefully , sentences like Mannion ’ s become the norm and not the exception .

Baltimore, MD — As TFTP reports on a regular basis, police officers, as well as child predators in the civilian world, often escape accountability despite horrifying crimes against children. A former officer from Baltimore was about to be one of these statistics last October after the prosecutors declined to prosecute him for the rape of a 13-year-old girl. The ex-cop’s desire to prey on children was so strong, however, that he would be caught multiple times and receive a massive sentence as a result.
Former Baltimore County corrections officer, Thomas Michael Mannion Jr., 46, was handed down a massive 400-month sentence in federal prison after being caught in the rape of at least two children and the production of child pornography.
As the Baltimore Sun reported, Mannion was originally charged with raping a 13-year-old in May 2019, but circuit court prosecutors declined to prosecute him on rape charges less than two weeks after the federal child porn indictment was filed in October 2019, court records show.
“Thomas Mannion is a predator and our children and communities are safer because he will now serve more than 33 years in federal prison,” said U.S. Attorney Robert K. Hur in a news release. “We are grateful for the collaboration of our law enforcement partners to remove this sexual predator from the community so he can no longer victimize our children.”
Last year, Mannion, who rented an apartment in Baltimore, was seen by his neighbor luring a 13-year-old girl into his home. On May 6, 2019, Mannion was arrested after his neighbor reported to police that they saw him in bed with the naked 13-year-old.
Upon investigation, police found that Mannion had groomed the girl from a conversation on Grindr, a dating app targeted at members of the LGBTQ community. When they searched his phone and computer, police found a trove of illicit video and images of the child. They also found images of a 14-year-old boy who Mannion later admitted to luring through Grindr as well.
As the Sun points out, in a plea agreement, Mannion said he met with several other minors who he found on the same dating even after the minors told him their age. Mannion discussed his sexual interest in children that he knew or had contact with while talking with users of the application.
According to the Justice Department, Mannion’s case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse.
The 400-month or 33-year sentence is certainly encouraging considering the sheer number of police officers and other child predators who commit unspeakable crimes against children only to receive wrist slaps in return.
In fact, earlier this month, TFTP reported on the case of former Honolulu police officer Kramer Aoki who was sentenced for his crimes against a 17-year-old girl. During a traffic stop, Aoki abused his power and sexually assaulted the teenage girl in his custody.
For sexually assaulting an underage girl while on duty, Aoki faced a maximum sentence of five years. While five years is still fairly low for his crimes, what he actually received was disgusting. Aoki will serve just 14 days in jail, will not have to register as a sex offender, and if he abides by the terms of his plea agreement, the charge will be wiped from his record.
Hopefully, sentences like Mannion’s become the norm and not the exception.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-26--Facebook Has Made Their Stance Clear:  Support Establishment Narrative Or Be Wiped Out

If you have been following the Free Thought Project or our police accountability page , Police the Police , on Facebook , chances are , you haven ’ t seen our content in a while .
This is not due to us cutting back on content creation or reporting .
In fact , in recent months , we have stepped it up but thanks to Facebook ’ s crackdown on information that doesn ’ t toe the establishment groupthink line , our information is being seen by increasingly fewer people .
This is a major problem , not just for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but for the future of free thought itself .
If you were to visit a page like Occupy Democrats on Facebook , you can clearly see that they violate all the algorithm ’ s rules against posting too frequently , posting questionable information , and sharing repurposed unoriginal content .
If other outlets would manage their pages in a similar manner , rest assured that you would never hear from them as this is a way to ensure no one sees your posts .
Facebook has these algorithm checks in place — they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spam or inflammatory content .
However , Occupy Democrats appears to be given a pass as they toe the Left ’ s establishment line .
Many on the right will look at this and claim that it is evidence Facebook is censoring right-wing news while promoting the left , but this is inaccurate .
Case in point : Breitbart .
Like Occupy Democrats , Breitbart also clearly violates all the algorithm ’ s rules against posting too frequently and posting questionable information .
And , Like OD , their page receives tens of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of repeating the left ’ s establishment narrative , Breitbart repeats the right ’ s , so they are given a pass and are allowed to continue sharing information , even when that information is patently false .
In the meantime , outlets like the Free Thought Project get fact-checked on things that are widely accepted as true and our rank in the algorithm diminishes as a result .
In the following example , TFTP allowed a member of our Facebook group to post a photo in the group .
The photo stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shows Joe Biden holding hands with a former leader of the KKK , Robert Byrd .
As this was factual information , Facebook ’ s algorithm or some disgruntled employee made up fake information to claim it was “ Mostly False.
” As you can see in the image above , the post was rated as mostly false because it claimed that Robert Byrd was a Grand Wizard of the KKK .
The only problem with this rating is that the post never once claimed he was a grand wizard .
This was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nonetheless .
And as a result , fewer people see our information .
These examples are endless and extremely detrimental to the sharing of information .
As the below case illustrates , they can end in permanent bans and deletion of profiles based on completely false information .
A team member of the Free Thought Project , Johnny Liberty had his entire profile deleted and permanently banned and our page , Police the Police received a strike after Facebook falsely claimed we shared nudity .
Nowhere in the post does it show nudity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our reach was diminished and Johnny was permanently banned from Facebook for sharing a completely factual article .
It is not just The Free Thought Project either .
Our friends at Collective Evolution , Joe Martino and Arjun Walia had their profiles permanently banned by Facebook and subsequently lost admin access to their pages .
They were given no reason .
Collective Evolution , who has been around for a decade , may soon see their Facebook page with over 5,000,000 followers , wiped from the face of the internet and the thousands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be turned to dust .
Comedian JP Sears , who uses comedy to show the absurd nature of the two-party paradigm has experienced censorship and demonetization as well .
Earlier this month , his advertising account was demonetized because he allegedly shared “ false news.
” As we have illustrated above , there are many examples of this ‘ false news ’ rating being used to simply silence those who post it , despite the news being completely true .
After Facebook stripped him of his ad revenue , Sears laid out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accuracy .
Other outlets like Mother Jones , who is clearly on the left , have found themselves facing similar censorship .
Though they are on the left , Mother Jones frequently counters the establishment narrative like calling out US war crimes .
“ You guys were one of the outlets who got singled out to balance the ledger “ : That ’ s what a former Facebook employee told Monika Bauerlein and editor-in-chief of the magazine , Clara Jeffery , as they dug into recent news that the platform was throttling traffic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Last week , Jeffery made it her mission to expose this rampant censorship on the platform , calling Facebook a “ garbage company ” and a “ toxic cesspool ” damaging the US .
Like the right incorrectly claims , Jeffery incorrectly assumes that the censorship is aimed solely at those on the left , sadly missing the point that it is their anti-establishment stance that put a target on their backs .
She is spot on about one thing though , and that is the claim that Facebook is tearing apart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is an entire documentary devoted to showing exactly how this is happening , called The Social Dilemma .
If you have yet to watch it yet , we highly recommend doing so .
TFTP discussed it in a recent podcast with the founders of Collective Evolution .
Unfortunately , in the movie , their only solutions to rolling back this impending civil war brought on by Facebook and the like selectively censoring information , is using the government .
This can not and will not ever work .
As architect , engineer , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Buckminster Fuller famously said , “ You never change something by fighting the existing reality .
To change something , build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.
” There are new models out there right now that show how obsolete Facebook and their giant platform of thought manipulation and censorship has become .
It is up to us to vote with our use of social media to create real change .
Do we want to continue to allow Facebook to treat us as a product while making billions off censoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a massive civil war in the process ?
Or , do you want to do something as simple as using the new model , one that doesn ’ t steal your information and peddle it to the highest bidder ?
Over the past couple of years , we have been helping to build this new model and with your help , it can replace the tyrannical old one .
You can find us on mewe.com which shows no ads , censors no one ’ s political views , and has no algorithm designed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Our pages are below : We are also on minds.com and telegram .

If you have been following the Free Thought Project or our police accountability page, Police the Police, on Facebook, chances are, you haven’t seen our content in a while. This is not due to us cutting back on content creation or reporting. In fact, in recent months, we have stepped it up but thanks to Facebook’s crackdown on information that doesn’t toe the establishment groupthink line, our information is being seen by increasingly fewer people.
This is a major problem, not just for the future of the Free Thought Project but for the future of free thought itself.
If you were to visit a page like Occupy Democrats on Facebook, you can clearly see that they violate all the algorithm’s rules against posting too frequently, posting questionable information, and sharing repurposed unoriginal content. If other outlets would manage their pages in a similar manner, rest assured that you would never hear from them as this is a way to ensure no one sees your posts.
Facebook has these algorithm checks in place — they claim — to reduce the spread of spam or inflammatory content. However, Occupy Democrats appears to be given a pass as they toe the Left’s establishment line. Many on the right will look at this and claim that it is evidence Facebook is censoring right-wing news while promoting the left, but this is inaccurate.
Case in point: Breitbart. Like Occupy Democrats, Breitbart also clearly violates all the algorithm’s rules against posting too frequently and posting questionable information. And, Like OD, their page receives tens of millions of interactions a day.
Instead of repeating the left’s establishment narrative, Breitbart repeats the right’s, so they are given a pass and are allowed to continue sharing information, even when that information is patently false.
In the meantime, outlets like the Free Thought Project get fact-checked on things that are widely accepted as true and our rank in the algorithm diminishes as a result. In the following example, TFTP allowed a member of our Facebook group to post a photo in the group. The photo stated — 100% accurately — that it shows Joe Biden holding hands with a former leader of the KKK, Robert Byrd.
As this was factual information, Facebook’s algorithm or some disgruntled employee made up fake information to claim it was “Mostly False.”
As you can see in the image above, the post was rated as mostly false because it claimed that Robert Byrd was a Grand Wizard of the KKK. The only problem with this rating is that the post never once claimed he was a grand wizard. This was entirely concocted and we received a strike nonetheless. And as a result, fewer people see our information.
These examples are endless and extremely detrimental to the sharing of information. As the below case illustrates, they can end in permanent bans and deletion of profiles based on completely false information.
A team member of the Free Thought Project, Johnny Liberty had his entire profile deleted and permanently banned and our page, Police the Police received a strike after Facebook falsely claimed we shared nudity. Nowhere in the post does it show nudity. It presented facts only, yet our reach was diminished and Johnny was permanently banned from Facebook for sharing a completely factual article.
It is not just The Free Thought Project either. Our friends at Collective Evolution, Joe Martino and Arjun Walia had their profiles permanently banned by Facebook and subsequently lost admin access to their pages. They were given no reason.
Collective Evolution, who has been around for a decade, may soon see their Facebook page with over 5,000,000 followers, wiped from the face of the internet and the thousands of hours of work into building it will be turned to dust.
Comedian JP Sears, who uses comedy to show the absurd nature of the two-party paradigm has experienced censorship and demonetization as well. Earlier this month, his advertising account was demonetized because he allegedly shared “false news.” As we have illustrated above, there are many examples of this ‘false news’ rating being used to simply silence those who post it, despite the news being completely true.
After Facebook stripped him of his ad revenue, Sears laid out the problem sarcastically, yet with perfect accuracy.
Completely demonetized, as I’m mistakenly not brainwashed by the mainstream narrative. Sorry Facebook, I know it’s not right to accidentally think for myself. I’m working on getting rid of that destructive habit. In the mean time, I’ll try to be dumb enough to believe that the “independent fact checkers” are rooted in facts rather than an oath to preserve an unfactual narrative.
Other outlets like Mother Jones, who is clearly on the left, have found themselves facing similar censorship. Though they are on the left, Mother Jones frequently counters the establishment narrative like calling out US war crimes.
“You guys were one of the outlets who got singled out to balance the ledger“: That’s what a former Facebook employee told Monika Bauerlein and editor-in-chief of the magazine, Clara Jeffery, as they dug into recent news that the platform was throttling traffic to certain publishers, including Mother Jones.
Last week, Jeffery made it her mission to expose this rampant censorship on the platform, calling Facebook a “garbage company” and a “toxic cesspool” damaging the US.
1/ I am enraged. Excellent reporting from WSJ's @dseetharaman and @EmilyGlazer finds that Facebook engineers—with sign-off from Zuckerberg himself—retooled their algorithm to throttle traffic to high-value progressive news orgs, @MotherJones IN PARTICULAR https://t.co/BeIYghE1xt pic.twitter.com/emQcZ832Iw — Clara Jeffery (@ClaraJeffery) October 16, 2020
8/ Facebook a) pumps disinfo over real news b) works in concert with some of the absolute worst actors on the Right c) didn't see the horrific results of livestreaming massacres coming. It is a toxic cesspool and directly implicated in everything tearing our country apart. — Clara Jeffery (@ClaraJeffery) October 16, 2020
Like the right incorrectly claims, Jeffery incorrectly assumes that the censorship is aimed solely at those on the left, sadly missing the point that it is their anti-establishment stance that put a target on their backs.
She is spot on about one thing though, and that is the claim that Facebook is tearing apart the country. In fact, there is an entire documentary devoted to showing exactly how this is happening, called The Social Dilemma. If you have yet to watch it yet, we highly recommend doing so. TFTP discussed it in a recent podcast with the founders of Collective Evolution.
Unfortunately, in the movie, their only solutions to rolling back this impending civil war brought on by Facebook and the like selectively censoring information, is using the government. This cannot and will not ever work.
As architect, engineer, inventor, writer, and futurist, Buckminster Fuller famously said, “You never change something by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
There are new models out there right now that show how obsolete Facebook and their giant platform of thought manipulation and censorship has become. It is up to us to vote with our use of social media to create real change.
Do we want to continue to allow Facebook to treat us as a product while making billions off censoring peaceful anti-establishment voices, potentially kicking off a massive civil war in the process? Or, do you want to do something as simple as using the new model, one that doesn’t steal your information and peddle it to the highest bidder?
Over the past couple of years, we have been helping to build this new model and with your help, it can replace the tyrannical old one.
You can find us on mewe.com which shows no ads, censors no one’s political views, and has no algorithm designed to stoke divide and control your thought.
Our pages are below:
Matt Agorist
Jason Bassler
The Free Thought Project
Police the Police
We are also on minds.com and telegram.
If you are not on our email list, please sign up here. If you’d like to subscribe to our site to aid in the battle against the censors and receive special perks along the way, you can do so at this link. Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-26--‘Iraq War Diaries’ At Ten Years: Truth is Treason

The purpose of journalism is to uncover truth – especially uncomfortable truth – and to publish it for the benefit of society .
In a free society , we must be informed of the criminal acts carried out by governments in the name of the people .
Throughout history , journalists have uncovered the many ways governments lie , cheat , and steal – and the great lengths they will go to keep the people from finding out .
Great journalists like Seymour Hersh , who reported to us the tragedy of the Mai Lai Massacre and the horrors that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Iraq , are essential .
Ten years ago last week , Julian Assange ’ s Wikileaks organization published an exposé of US government wrongdoing on par with the above Hersh bombshell stories .
Publication of the “ Iraq War Diaries ” showed us all the brutality of the US attack on Iraq .
It told us the truth about the US invasion and occupation of that country .
This was no war of defense against a nation threatening us with weapons of mass destruction .
This was no liberation of the country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to Iraq .
No , the release of nearly 400,000 classified US Army field reports showed us in dirty detail that the US attack was a war of aggression , based on lies , where hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed and injured .
We learned that the US military classified anyone they killed in Iraq as “ enemy combatants.
” We learned that more than 700 Iraqi civilians were killed for “ driving too close ” to one of the hundreds of US military checkpoints – including pregnant mothers-to-be rushing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US military personnel routinely handed “ detainees ” over to Iraqi security forces where they would be tortured and often killed .
Ten years after Assange ’ s brave act of journalism changed the world and exposed one of the crimes of the century , he sits alone in solitary confinement in a UK prison .
He sits literally fighting for his life , as if he is successfully extradited to the United States he faces 175 years in a “ supermax ” prison for committing “ espionage ” against a country of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On the Iraq War , we have punished the truth-tellers and rewarded the criminals .
People who knowingly lied us into the warlike Dick Cheney , George W. Bush , the Beltway neocon “ experts , ” and most of the media , faced neither punishment nor professional shaming for their acts .
In fact , they got off scot free and many even prospered .
Julian Assange explained that he published the Iraq War Diaries because he “ hoped to correct some of the attacks on truth that occurred before the war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ war officially ended.
” We used to praise brave journalists not afraid to take on the “ bad guys.
” Now we torture and imprison them .
President Trump has made a point of singling out the US attack on Iraq as one of the “ stupid wars ” that he was committed to ending .
But we wouldn ’ t know half of just how stupid – and evil – it was were it not for the brave actions of Julian Assange and whistleblower Chelsea Manning .
Journalism should not be a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immediately .
Dr. Ron Paul is an American physician , author , and former politician who served as the U.S. Representative for Texas 's 14th congressional district , which includes Galveston , from 1997 to 2013 as well as the 22nd congressional district for special term between 1976 and 1977 , when he lost reelection in 1978 , and for 3 later terms , from 1979 to 1985 .
On three occasions , he sought the presidency of the United States : as the Libertarian Party candidate in 1988 and as a candidate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2012 .
Paul is best known for his libertarian views and is a critic of American foreign , domestic , and monetary policies , including the military–industrial complex , the War on Drugs , and the Federal Reserve .
Paul has been married to Carol Wells since 1957 .
They have five children , 18 grandchildren and 4 great grandchildren .
Ron Paul produces a weekly column known as Ron Paul 's Texas Straight Talk and is the author of several books

The purpose of journalism is to uncover truth – especially uncomfortable truth – and to publish it for the benefit of society. In a free society, we must be informed of the criminal acts carried out by governments in the name of the people. Throughout history, journalists have uncovered the many ways governments lie, cheat, and steal – and the great lengths they will go to keep the people from finding out.
Great journalists like Seymour Hersh, who reported to us the tragedy of the Mai Lai Massacre and the horrors that took place at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, are essential.
Ten years ago last week, Julian Assange’s Wikileaks organization published an exposé of US government wrongdoing on par with the above Hersh bombshell stories. Publication of the “Iraq War Diaries” showed us all the brutality of the US attack on Iraq. It told us the truth about the US invasion and occupation of that country. This was no war of defense against a nation threatening us with weapons of mass destruction. This was no liberation of the country. We were not “bringing democracy” to Iraq.
No, the release of nearly 400,000 classified US Army field reports showed us in dirty detail that the US attack was a war of aggression, based on lies, where hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed and injured.
We learned that the US military classified anyone they killed in Iraq as “enemy combatants.” We learned that more than 700 Iraqi civilians were killed for “driving too close” to one of the hundreds of US military checkpoints – including pregnant mothers-to-be rushing to the hospital.
We learned that US military personnel routinely handed “detainees” over to Iraqi security forces where they would be tortured and often killed.
Ten years after Assange’s brave act of journalism changed the world and exposed one of the crimes of the century, he sits alone in solitary confinement in a UK prison. He sits literally fighting for his life, as if he is successfully extradited to the United States he faces 175 years in a “supermax” prison for committing “espionage” against a country of which he is not a citizen.
On the Iraq War, we have punished the truth-tellers and rewarded the criminals. People who knowingly lied us into the warlike Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, the Beltway neocon “experts,” and most of the media, faced neither punishment nor professional shaming for their acts. In fact, they got off scot free and many even prospered.
Julian Assange explained that he published the Iraq War Diaries because he “hoped to correct some of the attacks on truth that occurred before the war, and that continued on since that war officially ended.” We used to praise brave journalists not afraid to take on the “bad guys.” Now we torture and imprison them.
President Trump has made a point of singling out the US attack on Iraq as one of the “stupid wars” that he was committed to ending. But we wouldn’t know half of just how stupid – and evil – it was were it not for the brave actions of Julian Assange and whistleblower Chelsea Manning. Journalism should not be a crime and President Trump should pardon Assange immediately.
Article posted with permission from Ron Paul


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-27--If the polls are EXACTLY as flawed as they were in 2016, this election will come right down to the w

If the polls are EXACTLY as flawed as they were in 2016 , this election will come right down to the wire Do you think that you know who will win the election ?
Well , forecasting who will win elections is what the folks over at Fivethirtyeight do for a living , and in 2016 they told us on Election Day that Hillary Clinton had a 67 percent chance of winning .
Needless to say , they were widely mocked when Trump was victorious , but that didn ’ t stop them .
Today , Fivethirtyeight is projecting that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of winning this election , and that is a number that has stayed fairly stable in recent weeks .
But of course their projections are primarily based on the same state polls that were deeply flawed in 2016 , and so there is a very real possibility that they will be embarrassed once again in 2020 .
The mainstream media likes to focus on the big national polls that show Joe Biden with a large lead , but the truth is that this election is going to be won or lost in just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidate can win at least four of those six swing states is almost certain to win the election , and in this article , I am going to focus on polling numbers in only those six states .
In 2016 , the final RealClearPolitics average of Florida polls had Trump up by just 0.2 points , but he ended up winning the state by 1.2 points .
So Trump overperformed the polls by 1 point .
Right now , Joe Biden is leading by 1.8 points in the latest RCP average of Florida @ @ @ @ @ @ @ point from his lead that would make this a very , very tight race .
In 2016 , the final RealClearPolitics average of North Carolina polls had Trump up by 1.0 points , but he ended up winning the state by 3.7 points .
So Trump overperformed the polls by 2.7 points in that case .
Today , the latest RCP average of polls shows Biden up by 1.2 points , but a swing of 2.7 points would put Trump in the lead .
In 2016 , the final RealClearPolitics average of Arizona @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but he ended up winning the state by just 3.5 points .
So this is one of the rare cases where Trump actually underperformed the polls .
At this moment , the latest RCP average of polls has Biden up by 2.4 points , and that would seem to indicate that Trump may be in danger of losing those electoral votes .
Arizona is a special case because so many people from California are constantly migrating to the state , and that is fundamentally changing the demographics of the region .
Arizona @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and that process has accelerated here in 2020 .
In 2016 , the final RealClearPolitics average of Wisconsin polls had Trump down by 6.5 points , but he ended up winning the state by 0.7 points .
So Trump overperformed the polls by a whopping 7.2 points in that case .
Right now , Joe Biden is leading by 5.5 points in the latest RCP average of Wisconsin polls , but a 7.2 percent shift would put this state in Trump ’ s column .
In 2016 , the final RealClearPolitics average of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ points , but he ended up winning the state by 0.3 points .
So that was an instance where Trump outperformed the polls by 3.7 points .
Today , the latest RCP average of polls shows Biden up by 9.0 points in Michigan , and so even after taking 3.7 points away Biden would still seem to have a lead .
In 2016 , the final RealClearPolitics average of Pennsylvania polls had Trump losing by 1.9 points , but he ended up winning the state by 0.7 points .
So in that absolutely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2.6 points .
The latest RCP average of polls has Biden up by 4.8 points in Pennsylvania , but taking 2.6 points from that difference would make it a very close race .
Of course , it is always possible that either Trump or Biden could win states that they are not currently expected to win .
For example , it would not be a total shock if Biden won Iowa or Georgia , but those states are not likely to be in his column unless there is some sort of a landslide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shocker in Minnesota or Nevada , but in either of those cases , Biden would really have to underperform compared to the most recent polling numbers .
In the end , I believe that Florida and Pennsylvania are the two most critical states .
If one of the candidates is able to win both of those , it is going to be exceedingly difficult for the other guy to win .
For both campaigns , turning out people that the experts don ’ t expect to vote in high numbers will be so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ shy Trump voters ” showed up at the polls , and Trump is counting on that to happen again here in 2020 .
For the Biden campaign , high turnout among young and minority voters is critical , but Democratic candidates have been disappointed by young voters many times before .
As I write this article , the numbers show that more than 64 million Americans have already voted , and it is being projected that we will see the highest level of voter participation in a presidential election since 1908 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote in this election , and as I discussed yesterday , most of them believe that their candidate will end up winning .
Because so many people are voting by mail , it will take some time to get the final results , but once a winner is finally declared there will be tens of millions of Americans that will be emotionally devastated .
For many Democrats , another four years of Trump is about the worst thing that they could possibly imagine .
If Trump wins again , some have indicated that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but many more will use it as an opportunity to cause tremendous chaos in the streets .
For many Republicans , Trump is a hero figure that transcends politics .
Watching him lose would be like having their favorite teams lose the Super Bowl , the World Series , the World Cup and the NBA Finals simultaneously .
Trump is deeply , deeply loved by millions of conservatives , and a loss would be more than many of them would be able to handle .
The ironic thing is that most Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about Biden one way or the other .
In the end , this election is all about Donald Trump , and very soon we will know whether the number of Americans that love Trump is greater than the number that hate him .

If the polls are EXACTLY as flawed as they were in 2016, this election will come right down to the wire
Do you think that you know who will win the election? Well, forecasting who will win elections is what the folks over at Fivethirtyeight do for a living, and in 2016 they told us on Election Day that Hillary Clinton had a 67 percent chance of winning. Needless to say, they were widely mocked when Trump was victorious, but that didn’t stop them. Today, Fivethirtyeight is projecting that Joe Biden has an 87 percent chance of winning this election, and that is a number that has stayed fairly stable in recent weeks. But of course their projections are primarily based on the same state polls that were deeply flawed in 2016, and so there is a very real possibility that they will be embarrassed once again in 2020.
The mainstream media likes to focus on the big national polls that show Joe Biden with a large lead, but the truth is that this election is going to be won or lost in just six absolutely critical swing states. Whichever candidate can win at least four of those six swing states is almost certain to win the election, and in this article, I am going to focus on polling numbers in only those six states.
Florida
In 2016, the final RealClearPolitics average of Florida polls had Trump up by just 0.2 points, but he ended up winning the state by 1.2 points.
So Trump overperformed the polls by 1 point.
Right now, Joe Biden is leading by 1.8 points in the latest RCP average of Florida polls, but if you subtract one point from his lead that would make this a very, very tight race.
North Carolina
In 2016, the final RealClearPolitics average of North Carolina polls had Trump up by 1.0 points, but he ended up winning the state by 3.7 points.
So Trump overperformed the polls by 2.7 points in that case.
Today, the latest RCP average of polls shows Biden up by 1.2 points, but a swing of 2.7 points would put Trump in the lead.
Arizona
In 2016, the final RealClearPolitics average of Arizona polls had Trump up by 4.0 points, but he ended up winning the state by just 3.5 points.
So this is one of the rare cases where Trump actually underperformed the polls.
At this moment, the latest RCP average of polls has Biden up by 2.4 points, and that would seem to indicate that Trump may be in danger of losing those electoral votes.
Arizona is a special case because so many people from California are constantly migrating to the state, and that is fundamentally changing the demographics of the region. Arizona has been drifting left for years, and that process has accelerated here in 2020.
Wisconsin
In 2016, the final RealClearPolitics average of Wisconsin polls had Trump down by 6.5 points, but he ended up winning the state by 0.7 points.
So Trump overperformed the polls by a whopping 7.2 points in that case.
Right now, Joe Biden is leading by 5.5 points in the latest RCP average of Wisconsin polls, but a 7.2 percent shift would put this state in Trump’s column.
Michigan
In 2016, the final RealClearPolitics average of Michigan polls had Trump losing by 3.4 points, but he ended up winning the state by 0.3 points.
So that was an instance where Trump outperformed the polls by 3.7 points.
Today, the latest RCP average of polls shows Biden up by 9.0 points in Michigan, and so even after taking 3.7 points away Biden would still seem to have a lead.
Pennsylvania
In 2016, the final RealClearPolitics average of Pennsylvania polls had Trump losing by 1.9 points, but he ended up winning the state by 0.7 points.
So in that absolutely pivotal state Trump overperformed the polls by 2.6 points.
The latest RCP average of polls has Biden up by 4.8 points in Pennsylvania, but taking 2.6 points from that difference would make it a very close race.
Of course, it is always possible that either Trump or Biden could win states that they are not currently expected to win. For example, it would not be a total shock if Biden won Iowa or Georgia, but those states are not likely to be in his column unless there is some sort of a landslide.
Likewise, Trump could pull a shocker in Minnesota or Nevada, but in either of those cases, Biden would really have to underperform compared to the most recent polling numbers.
In the end, I believe that Florida and Pennsylvania are the two most critical states. If one of the candidates is able to win both of those, it is going to be exceedingly difficult for the other guy to win.
For both campaigns, turning out people that the experts don’t expect to vote in high numbers will be so important.
In 2016, hordes of “shy Trump voters” showed up at the polls, and Trump is counting on that to happen again here in 2020.
For the Biden campaign, high turnout among young and minority voters is critical, but Democratic candidates have been disappointed by young voters many times before.
As I write this article, the numbers show that more than 64 million Americans have already voted, and it is being projected that we will see the highest level of voter participation in a presidential election since 1908.
So many Americans are fired up to vote in this election, and as I discussed yesterday, most of them believe that their candidate will end up winning.
Because so many people are voting by mail, it will take some time to get the final results, but once a winner is finally declared there will be tens of millions of Americans that will be emotionally devastated.
For many Democrats, another four years of Trump is about the worst thing that they could possibly imagine. If Trump wins again, some have indicated that they will leave the country for good, but many more will use it as an opportunity to cause tremendous chaos in the streets.
For many Republicans, Trump is a hero figure that transcends politics. Watching him lose would be like having their favorite teams lose the Super Bowl, the World Series, the World Cup and the NBA Finals simultaneously. Trump is deeply, deeply loved by millions of conservatives, and a loss would be more than many of them would be able to handle.
The ironic thing is that most Americans don’t really care too much about Biden one way or the other. In the end, this election is all about Donald Trump, and very soon we will know whether the number of Americans that love Trump is greater than the number that hate him.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-27--What do Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh & John Roberts Have In Common?

What do Amy Coney Barrett , Brett Kavanaugh & John Roberts Have In Common ?
Well , if I told you here , you wouldn ’ t need to watch the show , but aside from the obvious , which is that they are all on the supreme Court of the united States and all are Roman Catholic , they all have a single point of history they were involved in .
And it looks like two decades later , they ’ ll be called up to do it again .
Articles and videos referenced in this episode .
Partner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to his `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl @ @ @

What do Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh & John Roberts Have In Common? Well, if I told you here, you wouldn’t need to watch the show, but aside from the obvious, which is that they are all on the supreme Court of the united States and all are Roman Catholic, they all have a single point of history they were involved in. And it looks like two decades later, they’ll be called up to do it again.
Articles and videos referenced in this episode.
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/brett-kavanaugh-vince-fosters-suicide-ken-starrs-recent-charge/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_in_the_United_States
https://theweek.com/articles/494806/supreme-court-last-protestant
https://web.archive.org/web/20201010224408if_/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/amy-coney-barrett-bush-gore/2020/10/10/594641b8-09e3-11eb-991c-be6ead8c4018_story.html
https://mavenroundtable.io/theintellectualist/news/report-barrett-helped-bush-steal-2000-election-by-defending-ballot-fraud-2wQNimrtQESi-5NtM2GDuA
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-27--Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter Answers Critics’ Objections To “The Missing Virus”

Former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport has been calling out the fraud of the novel coronavirus/COVID-19 for quite a while and pointing out the very documents that are said to be evidence of confirming the “ virus ” to be just the opposite .
In a recent piece , Rappoport answers his critics with it comes to the “ missing virus.
” • Former CBSHealthwatch Reporter : “ ‘ The Virus ’ Is One Of The Greatest Frauds In Modern History ” • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : In The Political Battle Over A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No Concern • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : Phony Test , Dangerous Drugs – Trump Is Poster Boy For COVID-19 Propaganda • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter Reveals “ Missing Study ” In Coronavirus Narrative – Claims Secret Of Fraud Is In Plain Sight • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : “ If The Virus Isn ’ t There… Why Do They Believe It Is ?
• Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : COVID Is A Fraud , But So Are Trump & Biden • The Virus That Isn ’ t There : The Con , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sales Job On The Virus That Isn ’ t There For months , I ’ ve been providing evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been proven to exist .
Several recent objections to my analysis have been brought forward .
I ’ m not interested in mentioning names or getting into disputes with people who might otherwise be doing important work .
One objection that ’ s been raised : a key CDC document [ 1 ] I quoted [ 2 ] , which openly admitted that the virus was “ not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in July of this year .
It was reprinted or updated in July ; it was originally published in February , when presumably , the CDC might have had a problem obtaining isolated virus .
Really ?
The “ pandemic ” was already underway in February .
The CDC , one of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world , couldn ’ t get isolated virus then—couldn ’ t get it anywhere .
In other words , there was a declared pandemic without a proven virus .
That is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care whether it was February or July .
If the CDC couldn ’ t get the virus , no one had it .
No one had it , because no one had isolated it .
Researchers simply assumed it existed .
Not only that , the CDC document [ 1 ] [ 2 ] in which the agency admitted the virus was “ not available ” was a long article describing how to perform the PCR test for the virus .
What virus ?
The one that wasn ’ t there ?
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ change the fate of humanity , but you don ’ t have the item the procedure is supposed to detect .
This is permissible ?
This is excusable ?
Not unless science is fairy tales .
A few superficial critics of my work should also realize this CDC document is far from my only evidence showing the virus hasn ’ t been isolated .
They should read all my articles on the subject .
Another objection to my analysis : labs do , in fact , have isolated virus in the form of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that phrase mean ?
It means SOUP .
In dishes , in labs , researchers assume they have virus mixed with cells , mixed with chemicals and drugs and who knows what else .
If this is “ isolation , ” a rabbit is a spaceship .
Further , it is claimed , because some of those cells—monkey cells—die in the dish in the lab , this means the virus is there and is doing the killing .
Nonsense .
First of all , the cells are being starved of nutrients .
Second @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poisoned by the drugs and chemicals in the soup .
The presumption of the virus doing the killing is unwarranted and absurd .
[ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] The third objection to my analysis : researchers can assemble the PCR test without actually having the virus .
They can substitute “ synthetic RNA ” which is a close match to the virus .
I see .
And they know the synthetic RNA is a close match to the missing virus exactly how ?
Answer : they don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
[ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] [ 11 ] This would be like saying : “ Ahem .
There is an unknown planet in our solar system .
We haven ’ t seen it , we don ’ t know where it is , we don ’ t know what it looks like , but we do know the moon is a very close version of the unknown planet .
Therefore , we can use everything we know about the moon to infer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” This kind of tap-dancing might win you a prize at a junior high school variety show , but it has nothing to do with science .
For those who want to further explore the core issue of the existence of the virus—e.g.
, medical professionals , who have large gaps and blind sports in their understanding—I STRONGLY suggest accessing the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman [ 12 ] and Dr. Tom Cowan [ 13 ] .
I understand that some people who are very much opposed to the lockdowns and the economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the channels of : the deceptive PCR test ; the false case and death numbers ; the dangerous vaccine ; the ripping away of Constitutional and natural freedoms .
Anyone who has been reading my more than 200 articles about COVID [ 14 ] knows I ’ ve been tackling those issues since the beginning .
But the existence of the virus is not merely a distraction .
It ’ s at the starting gate of the whole effort to initiate new levels of enslavement for all humans .
It can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foolish of me to criticize people who are otherwise doing very important work to stem the tide of the technocratic takeover of Earth , simply because they aren ’ t addressing the existence of the virus .
If a few of them want to criticize me , fine .
I ’ ve been around the block more times than I can count .
It ’ s not a problem .
I ’ d suggest , though , they do more than a dip a toe into the water of the stupendous virus-fraud .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of accusing me of “ confusing people about the pandemic.
” That is not a standard for measuring veracity .
It ’ s actually a low-level con .
When two sides disagree , proponents of one side assert the other side is sowing confusion .
Baloney .
The confusion , in this case , is inherent in the conventional view of virus-isolation and proof of discovery .
One disease one germ , a thousand diseases a thousand germs—this lock-step ironclad pharmaceutical propaganda of more than a century has caused monstrous harm .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We don ’ t need unanimity on every issue .
But we do need a measure of good will and decency .
I ’ m glad to report that , with only a few exceptions , this is what I find .
Coda : Blithely accepting the existence of the virus puts people on a slippery slope .
From that point on , they may accept at least partial anti-human “ containment measures.
” Lockdowns under certain circumstances , some mask wearing , some distancing , some restrictions on the size and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ loved ones , some tracing , some testing .
Before they know it , they ’ re dealing from a position of weakness and compromise : “ I agree that a certain amount of destruction is necessary , but not as much destruction as Fauci wants… ” On moral , spiritual , strategic , political , economic , and scientific grounds , that ’ s disastrous .
Now , as a backgrounder , here is my article about Dr. Tom Cowan ’ s recent exploration of the COVID virus invented out of sheer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense —Dr .
Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC , in their journal , Emerging Infectious Diseases : “ Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease , United States ” — The hits keep coming .
The CDC used an arbitrary computer “ tinker-toy ” process to invent a description of the virus .
The virus that no one has proven exists .
This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan .
The CDC article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fallon Morrell .
Her co-author , Dr. Cowan , fleshes out the fraud .
Cowan ’ s article is titled , “ Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘ Grew ’ the ‘ Virus ’ .
” [ 4 ] [ 5 ] Dr. Cowan : “ [ The CDC journal article ] was published in June 2020 [ original publication , March 2020 ] .
The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation , purification and biological characteristics of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ share this information with other scientists for their own research .
A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
” “ First , in the section titled ‘ Whole Genome Sequencing , ’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end , they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes .
This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 37 segments and put them into a computer program , which filled in the rest of the base pairs.
” In other words , the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference .
If this is science , a penguin is a spaceship .
Cowan : “ To me , this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud .
Here is an equivalency : A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof , a hair from a tail , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn , and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn .
Of course , they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn ’ s hair , hooves and horn.
” “ The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘ consensus , ’ sort of like a vote .
Again , different computer programs will come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ unicorn , ’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.
” As I ’ ve been stating [ 10 ] , the “ discovery ” of the “ new virus ” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS .
Nothing real or believable about it .
But once the official pattern is laid down , others follow it dutifully .
Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article .
Using the ASSUMED new virus , in an UN-ISOLATED @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab : Cowan : “ The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later , a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading .
Let me quote the passage intact : ” “ ’ Therefore , we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines , including human adenocarcinoma cells ( A549 ) , human liver cells @ @ @ @ @ @ @ embryonic kidney cells ( HEK-293T ) .
In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [ monkey cells ] .
… Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection .
No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [ monkey ] cells , which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection .
In contrast , HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication , and A549 cells [ human cells ] were incompatible with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What does this language actually mean , and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community ?
When virologists attempt to prove infection , they have three possible ‘ hosts ’ or models on which they can test… ” “ The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures .
As I have pointed out many times , such inoculation has never been shown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.
” “ The shocking thing about the above [ CDC journal ] quote is that using their own methods , the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT , I repeat NOT , infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested .
In plain English , this means they proved , on their terms , that this ‘ new coronavirus ’ is not infectious to human beings .
It is ONLY infective to monkey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you add two potent drugs ( gentamicin and amphotericin ) , known to be toxic to kidneys , to the mix.
” “ My friends , read this again and again .
These virologists , published by the CDC , performed a clear proof , on their terms , showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings .
That is the only possible conclusion , but , unfortunately , this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion .
They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting , out of an arbitrary computer program… The existence and structure of the “ new virus ” … And then , taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus , in an un-isolated state , inject the soup into several types of cells in the lab… And discover the prime target—human cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus .
And after this good day ’ s work , walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened .
And oh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on this “ science.
” Naturally , we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus .
• CIA Mockingbirds Are Confessing Their Lies – One Even Said It Was His Job To Make Anti-Vaxxers Appear Whacko We ’ ve exposed this on a number of fronts as well via Dr. Rashid Buttar , Dr. Andrew Kaufman , Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Adil , UK nurse Kate Shemirani and Dr. Kevin Corbett to name a few .
• The Virus Lies & What They Are Leading Towards With Dr. Andrew Kaufman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Exposes The Lies Of Government & President ’ s Doctors Concerning Coronavirus & Viruses In General ( Video ) • Are We Actually Dealing With A Parasite & Not A Virus ?
• Providing the Data Of The Coronavirus Hoax In The UK Will Get A Doctor Suspended • Dr Rashid Buttar : The Coronavirus Agenda – What The Mainstream Media Don ’ t Want You To Know ( Video ) It ’ s way past time for people to demand the evidence here and then begin to remove those in power from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fraud in history .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport has been calling out the fraud of the novel coronavirus/COVID-19 for quite a while and pointing out the very documents that are said to be evidence of confirming the “virus” to be just the opposite. In a recent piece, Rappoport answers his critics with it comes to the “missing virus.”
Rappoport writes:
For months, I’ve been providing evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been proven to exist.
Several recent objections to my analysis have been brought forward.
I’m not interested in mentioning names or getting into disputes with people who might otherwise be doing important work.
One objection that’s been raised: a key CDC document [1] I quoted [2], which openly admitted that the virus was “not available,” was not really published in July of this year. It was reprinted or updated in July; it was originally published in February, when presumably, the CDC might have had a problem obtaining isolated virus.
Really? The “pandemic” was already underway in February. The CDC, one of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world, couldn’t get isolated virus then—couldn’t get it anywhere. In other words, there was a declared pandemic without a proven virus.
That is a damning fact. I don’t care whether it was February or July. If the CDC couldn’t get the virus, no one had it.
No one had it, because no one had isolated it. Researchers simply assumed it existed.
Not only that, the CDC document [1] [2] in which the agency admitted the virus was “not available” was a long article describing how to perform the PCR test for the virus. What virus? The one that wasn’t there?
You put together a test procedure that will change the fate of humanity, but you don’t have the item the procedure is supposed to detect. This is permissible? This is excusable? Not unless science is fairy tales.
A few superficial critics of my work should also realize this CDC document is far from my only evidence showing the virus hasn’t been isolated. They should read all my articles on the subject.
Another objection to my analysis: labs do, in fact, have isolated virus in the form of “viral stocks.”
But what does that phrase mean? It means SOUP. In dishes, in labs, researchers assume they have virus mixed with cells, mixed with chemicals and drugs and who knows what else. If this is “isolation,” a rabbit is a spaceship.
Further, it is claimed, because some of those cells—monkey cells—die in the dish in the lab, this means the virus is there and is doing the killing.
Nonsense. First of all, the cells are being starved of nutrients. Second, they’re open to being poisoned by the drugs and chemicals in the soup. The presumption of the virus doing the killing is unwarranted and absurd. [3] [4] [5]
The third objection to my analysis: researchers can assemble the PCR test without actually having the virus. They can substitute “synthetic RNA” which is a close match to the virus.
I see. And they know the synthetic RNA is a close match to the missing virus exactly how? Answer: they don’t know. They assume. They pretend. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This would be like saying: “Ahem. There is an unknown planet in our solar system. We haven’t seen it, we don’t know where it is, we don’t know what it looks like, but we do know the moon is a very close version of the unknown planet. Therefore, we can use everything we know about the moon to infer a precise description of the unknown planet.”
This kind of tap-dancing might win you a prize at a junior high school variety show, but it has nothing to do with science.
For those who want to further explore the core issue of the existence of the virus—e.g., medical professionals, who have large gaps and blind sports in their understanding—I STRONGLY suggest accessing the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman [12] and Dr. Tom Cowan [13].
I understand that some people who are very much opposed to the lockdowns and the economic destruction want to keep the argument along the channels of: the deceptive PCR test; the false case and death numbers; the dangerous vaccine; the ripping away of Constitutional and natural freedoms.
Anyone who has been reading my more than 200 articles about COVID [14] knows I’ve been tackling those issues since the beginning. But the existence of the virus is not merely a distraction. It’s at the starting gate of the whole effort to initiate new levels of enslavement for all humans. It can’t be brushed aside.
It would be foolish of me to criticize people who are otherwise doing very important work to stem the tide of the technocratic takeover of Earth, simply because they aren’t addressing the existence of the virus.
If a few of them want to criticize me, fine. I’ve been around the block more times than I can count. It’s not a problem. I’d suggest, though, they do more than a dip a toe into the water of the stupendous virus-fraud.
And don’t try the tactic of accusing me of “confusing people about the pandemic.” That is not a standard for measuring veracity. It’s actually a low-level con. When two sides disagree, proponents of one side assert the other side is sowing confusion. Baloney. The confusion, in this case, is inherent in the conventional view of virus-isolation and proof of discovery.
One disease one germ, a thousand diseases a thousand germs—this lock-step ironclad pharmaceutical propaganda of more than a century has caused monstrous harm. It’s time to end the madness.
We don’t need unanimity on every issue. But we do need a measure of good will and decency. I’m glad to report that, with only a few exceptions, this is what I find.
Coda: Blithely accepting the existence of the virus puts people on a slippery slope. From that point on, they may accept at least partial anti-human “containment measures.” Lockdowns under certain circumstances, some mask wearing, some distancing, some restrictions on the size and nature of gatherings, some isolation from loved ones, some tracing, some testing. Before they know it, they’re dealing from a position of weakness and compromise: “I agree that a certain amount of destruction is necessary, but not as much destruction as Fauci wants…” On moral, spiritual, strategic, political, economic, and scientific grounds, that’s disastrous.
Now, as a backgrounder, here is my article about Dr. Tom Cowan’s recent exploration of the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense: [5]
Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
—Dr. Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States”—
by Jon Rappoport
October 19, 2020
The hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy” process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan.
The CDC article [3] was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr. Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.” [4] [5]
Dr. Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.”
“First, in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”
In other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a spaceship.
Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”
“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”
As I’ve been stating [10], the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or believable about it.
But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.
Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab:
Cowan: “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”
“’Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”
“What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test…”
“The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.”
“The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”
“My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”
So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program…
The existence and structure of the “new virus”…
And then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the lab…
And discover the prime target—human cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus.
And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened.
And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.”
Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus.
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
[3] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
[4] https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
[5] http://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/19/dr-tom-cowan-explores-the-covid-virus-invented-out-of-sheer-nonsense/
[6] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/09/covid-the-virus-that-isnt-there-the-root-fraud-exposed/
[8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/12/the-fake-coronavirus-and-the-missing-study-the-secret-in-plain-sight/
[9] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/13/yet-another-case-of-the-missing-virus-they-lied-and-locked-down-the-world/
[10] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/15/if-the-virus-isnt-there-why-do-they-believe-it-is/
[11] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/22/the-virus-that-isnt-there-genetic-sequencing-and-the-magic-trick/
[12] https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/
[13] https://drtomcowan.com
[14] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid
We’ve exposed this on a number of fronts as well via Dr. Rashid Buttar, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Adil, UK nurse Kate Shemirani and Dr. Kevin Corbett to name a few.
It’s way past time for people to demand the evidence here and then begin to remove those in power from office and charge them with the greatest fraud in history.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-27--Do These Photos Prove Hunter Biden Was Blackmailed By Russians?

Well , a lot has been found on Hunter Biden ’ s laptop for sure .
While some of it is purely salacious for the media to put out , other elements do bring up questions about possible blackmail of the former vice president ’ s son .
With that in mind , The Gateway Pundit has provided a bit of evidence that quite possibly some “ friends ” that Hunter Biden spent his time with in Hollywood , are not only Russian , but the photos could be used to blackmail him , and maybe even his father .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bombshell Report On Biden ’ s Daughter ’ s Diary • Did The Bidens Collude to Suppress “ Sexually Inappropriate ” Actions of Hunter With Minor ?
Text Messages Seem to Indicate So Hunter Biden was certainly an addict and may still be .
He put himself in highly compromising situations as a result .
He was high or wasted much of the time and therefore very narcissistic and reckless .
This showed in the way Hunter treated women and drugs .
Hunter ’ s father Joe Biden used Hunter to put together @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enterprise to increase the Biden family ’ s wealth .
This occurred throughout Joe ’ s 47 years in politics .
He ’ s now running for President .
But the Biden family has a problem .
They were involved in numerous shady deals around the world and they are susceptible to blackmail as a result .
In addition , Hunter put his family in additional blackmail situations all by himself .
Because of his addiction , Hunter found himself in shady places with shady people .
One such example was in October @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some ‘ friends ’ .
Hunter somehow landed in this luxurious property with a group of girls and guys .
One member of the group was a girl by the name of Christina .
She has a California driver ’ s license .
She also spent some time with Hunter .
But these aren ’ t ordinary friends , we believe they are Russian friends .
These guys hung out with Hunter Biden at the luxurious property in West Hollywood .
And by the way , the property was loaded up with cameras @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there were pictures taken of him at this property in West Hollywood .
One such picture is Hunter with some other friends , female friends .
Hunter and these friends got naked and spent some time together .
( Remember there are cameras all over the place . )
One interesting observation noted on one of the women in the above picture is that she had a tattoo on her upper back .
Someone noticed this and covered it up with an ellipse shaped tattoo but no one has an ellipse tattoo .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ellipse , a dragon shaped tattoo .
This type of tattoo is similar to the types of tatoos [ sic ] a sex slave would have on her back .
We also know that at least one of the women at the luxurious property in West Hollywood was a Russian .
We know this because we have a copy of her passport .
In summary , Hunter Biden , spent some time in 2018 with some Russians at a property in West Hollywood and engaged in sexual activities .
These activities were likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surveillance .
So , we see that there seems to be some evidence to follow up on despite the report from One America News Network that a source in the Justice Department said the FBI had dropped the investigation due to concerns over the story from the repair shop owner .
So , the FBI continues to not deal properly with what may be potentially treasonous actions ?
No surprise there , but the question is , what is President Trump doing about it except using it for political gain ?
He ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ faithfully executed ( Article 2 , Section 3 ) .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Well, a lot has been found on Hunter Biden’s laptop for sure. While some of it is purely salacious for the media to put out, other elements do bring up questions about possible blackmail of the former vice president’s son.
With that in mind, The Gateway Pundit has provided a bit of evidence that quite possibly some “friends” that Hunter Biden spent his time with in Hollywood, are not only Russian, but the photos could be used to blackmail him, and maybe even his father.
Hunter Biden was certainly an addict and may still be. He put himself in highly compromising situations as a result. He was high or wasted much of the time and therefore very narcissistic and reckless. This showed in the way Hunter treated women and drugs.
Hunter’s father Joe Biden used Hunter to put together deals around the world in a racketeering enterprise to increase the Biden family’s wealth. This occurred throughout Joe’s 47 years in politics. He’s now running for President.
But the Biden family has a problem. They were involved in numerous shady deals around the world and they are susceptible to blackmail as a result. In addition, Hunter put his family in additional blackmail situations all by himself. Because of his addiction, Hunter found himself in shady places with shady people.
One such example was in October 2018 on Devlin Drive West Hollywood with some ‘friends’. Hunter somehow landed in this luxurious property with a group of girls and guys. One member of the group was a girl by the name of Christina. She has a California driver’s license. She also spent some time with Hunter.
Christina has some friends.
But these aren’t ordinary friends, we believe they are Russian friends. These guys hung out with Hunter Biden at the luxurious property in West Hollywood. And by the way, the property was loaded up with cameras.
The problem for Hunter is that there were pictures taken of him at this property in West Hollywood. One such picture is Hunter with some other friends, female friends.
Hunter and these friends got naked and spent some time together. (Remember there are cameras all over the place.)
One interesting observation noted on one of the women in the above picture is that she had a tattoo on her upper back. Someone noticed this and covered it up with an ellipse shaped tattoo but no one has an ellipse tattoo. We were able to uncover under the ellipse, a dragon shaped tattoo. This type of tattoo is similar to the types of tatoos [sic] a sex slave would have on her back.
We also know that at least one of the women at the luxurious property in West Hollywood was a Russian. We know this because we have a copy of her passport.
In summary, Hunter Biden, spent some time in 2018 with some Russians at a property in West Hollywood and engaged in sexual activities. These activities were likely videotaped because the whole place was under surveillance.
So, we see that there seems to be some evidence to follow up on despite the report from One America News Network that a source in the Justice Department said the FBI had dropped the investigation due to concerns over the story from the repair shop owner.
SCOOP: DOJ source tells @OANN that FBI dropped investigation of Hunter Biden laptop because they did not believe the repair shop owner's story would hold up in court, although Mac Isaac provided them with evidence. They found zero evidence of foreign involvement. — Trunalimunumaprze Poso (@JackPosobiec) October 25, 2020
This is what Wray has to get around as questions are being asking about his handling of this. Dec 2019 was just before DNC primary votes began and this clearly would have been a major factor. Wray never told WH any of this. — Trunalimunumaprze Poso (@JackPosobiec) October 25, 2020
Very simple to anyone who attempts to question. DOJ & DNI both verify laptop is legitimate and Russia had zero to do with it. The FBI after seeing contents in November 2019 came back with a grand jury subpoena and took it just 2 weeks later. Nothing has been disproven. Nothing. — Adam Housley (@adamhousley) October 23, 2020
So, the FBI continues to not deal properly with what may be potentially treasonous actions? No surprise there, but the question is, what is President Trump doing about it except using it for political gain? He’s supposed to ensure the laws are faithfully executed (Article 2, Section 3).
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media