thewashingtonstandard--2020-05-13--How Big Wireless Lobbied Governments To Build 5G For Citizen Data Collection & Surveillance

The fascist-like way in which Big Wireless has gone about putting in the new 5G systems across the earth truly demonstrates conflicts of interests , suppression of valuable information regarding health risks to humans and lots of money for those involved .
So , how were governments lobbied into such a thing ?
They wanted data collection of their citizens and surveillance on them… that ’ s right , they wanted Orwell ’ s 1984 in 2020 .
While selling 5G technology to the public as a means for faster downloads , Big Wireless — comprising a web of telecom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spending millions to lobby governments the world over to implement the next generation of cellular technology because of its potential for data collection and surveillance of citizens .
While the debate continues around 5G ’ s potential impact on human health , the environment and wildlife , often overlooked in the discussion about 5G is how the technology will be used for data collection and surveillance .
Big Wireless has spent over three decades lobbying state powers to build this technology while selling it to the public as a means for faster downloads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & Internet Association – an organization whose leadership has maintained a revolving door relationship with the U.S. Federal Communication Commission – has collaborated on or guided regulatory policy related to not only 5G , but the roll out of cell phones and other digital technology .
The CTIA annually lobbies for the industry to the tune of millions of dollars , making them one of the most powerful telecom lobby groups .
The COVID19 pandemic has caused governments around the world to lockdown their nations , cancel public school sessions , and cost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of spreading the virus and overloading the healthcare system are triggering an authoritarian response from many of these governments — including the United States .
For many Americans , these aggressive measures have halted typical daily activities .
Taking a trip to the gym , work , school , or out with friends – are no longer an option .
However , while most non-essential activities have stopped , the controversial expansion of the 5th generation of cellular infrastructure has continued .
With the support and lobbying of the CTIA , Big Wireless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Records from ProPublica show the CTIA lobbied for 2 recents bills related to 5G infrastructure .
On March 23 , the 5G rollout took one step forward in the U.S. when President Donald Trump signed a bill aimed at “ securing America ’ s 5G infrastructure.
” The Secure 5G and Beyond Act calls for Congress to present a comprehensive plan for accelerating the nation ’ s 5G network “ not later than 180 days.
” The building of the next generation network has rapidly advanced due to the passing of the Secure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability ( DATA ) Act , which passed the House in December 2019 .
In April 2019 , President Donald Trump held a press conference where he stated his intention to expand the U.S. wireless infrastructure as part of the effort to defeat China in the so-called “ Race to 5G ” .
During the press conference Trump stood next to the head of the Federal Communications Commission and telecommunication employees as he declared , “ The race to 5G is on and we must win.
” While Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apparent race – even during the middle of a pandemic – determining exactly who is the driving force behind the push towards the 5th generation of cellular technology requires digging through decades of lawsuits , industry corruption , and captured agencies .
In part I of this investigation , this report will take a deep dive into the web of Big Wireless , who those companies are , it ’ s lobbyists , law firms and industry as a whole that are spending millions of dollars pushing for 5G around the world .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Big Wireless working within telecom companies that work with the US government to collect data on citizens , while also looking at how Big Wireless has worked to bully and silence critics who have expressed concern over its health impacts and civil liberties .
Part II of this series will look at how 5G will be used as a surveillance tool by governments to collect data on citizens and will work to fulfil the overall goal of creating a techno-tyranny state that should concern any American citizen that upholds their civil liberties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies and governments have spent billions of dollars promoting , marketing , and building the next generation of telecom technology , known as 5G , or 5th Generation .
The telecom companies involved in various aspects of the 5G rollout include Crowd Castle , American Tower , and Towerstream on the infrastructure side , and Comcast , Verizon , T-Mobile , Sprint , and AT & T on the internet/mobile service provider side .
Beginning with the introduction of 1G in 1979 , a new generation of cellular standards has appeared approximately every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by new frequency bands , higher data rates and non–backward compatible transmission technology .
As we move into the 2020 ’ s , the shift to the 5th generation has begun .
Beginning in late 2018 , cities like Houston , Atlanta , Boston , Chicago , Denver , San Diego , New York City , and Washington D.C. started deploying 5g for residential and commercial use .
While 5g is often touted as the solution to 4k movie downloads and virtual reality games , the new generation is also expected to herald @ @ @ @ @ @ @ driverless cars , traffic lights , pollution sensors , smart phones and countless other smart devices interact in what is known as “ The Internet of Things.
” The IoT has raised alarm bells for some privacy advocates because it will involve surrounding the public with hundreds of thousands of interconnected devices and sensors which are gathering mass amounts of data that will be used for public advertising and monitoring of habits .
5G infrastructure will be the backbone to the IoT .
The switch from 4g to 5g is a change unlike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ difference is that 5G technology uses much higher frequencies , ranging from 10-300 GHZ .
Currently , 4G wireless systems operate on 700 to 2700 MHz .
5g is using millimeter waves which do not travel far and are easily blocked by trees , buildings , and walls .
Due to the nature of mm waves the FCC has stated that for 5G to operate successfully it will require the installation of hundreds of thousands of new cell sites , towers , and additions to existing infrastructure .
Due largely to the concerns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the subsequent exposure to radiofrequency radiation ) the 5G roll out has been opposed by thousands of doctors , scientists , health professionals , and even the U.S. military and branches of the U.S. government .
The movement against the 5G roll out also sparked a global day of protest in January and April 2020 .
Meanwhile , nations like Sweden , Slovenia , and cities like Brussels , Belgium have decided to ban or temporarily halt the roll out of the new infrastructure until further health studies are conducted .
Who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
For the last year , Americans have been peppered with messages from telecommunications companies and the tech industry at large , stressing the importance of being first in the Race to 5G .
We are told if we want driverless vehicles , robot assistants , cleaner and safer cities , and more convenient lives we must support and pay for the upgrades to 5G .
Apparently , the public should also ignore the fact that this upgrade has sparked lawsuits over health , privacy , and local power concerns .
But beyond @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public to adopt the next generation of cell phones and devices , what exactly is this race about ?
Geopolitically speaking , the Race to 5g describes the ongoing rift between the U.S. and China , the new digital Cold War where these two superpowers race to implement the next generation of cellular technology because of its potential for massive profit and massive data collection .
The American mainstream media and President Trump have stated that Chinese company Huawei could use their 5g infrastructure to spy on Americans .
Additionally , Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies to abandon Huawei equipment .
In January Foreign Policy wrote , “ Because the ( Chinese ) companies that make the equipment are subservient to the Chinese government , they could be forced to include backdoors in the hardware or software to give Beijing remote access .
Eavesdropping is also a risk , although efforts to listen in would almost certainly be detectable.
” This fear of Chinese spying using 5g equipment completely ignores the reality that the U.S. government has the same exact opportunity to pressure American companies to spy on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Policy noted , “ These insecurities are a result of market forces that prioritize costs over security and of governments , including the United States , that want to preserve the option of surveillance in 5G networks .
If the United States is serious about tackling the national security threats related to an insecure 5G network , it needs to rethink the extent to which it values corporate profits and government espionage over security.
” Whether the public is actually demanding faster downloads is up for debate , but what is not debatable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the tech industry are pushing the shift towards 5g .
While it is true that 5g has the potential to spur on innovation in the fields of medicine , manufacturing , entertainment , and other industries – it seems much of the hype around the 5G rollout is coming from the telecommunication industry itself , specifically the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association , or CTIA .
Established in 1984 , the CTIA claims to represent the U.S. wireless communications industry , from carriers and equipment manufacturers .
The CTIA “ advocates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , state , and local levels that foster the continued innovation , investment and increasing economic impact of America ’ s wireless industry .
CTIA is active on a wide range of issues including spectrum policy , wireless infrastructure , and the Internet of Things , among others.
” They also host events on topics ranging from cybersecurity to 5G .
The CTIA ’ s Board of Directors includes the presidents , CEOs and other senior officials of Verizon , Sprint , T Mobile , Nokia , Erricson , Intel , General Motors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Brad Gillen , the current Executive Vice President of the CTIA , was formerly a Legal Advisor to a former FCC Commissioner and served in other senior policy roles at the FCC and with DISH Network .
Mr. Gillen was also a partner at Wilkinson Barker Knauer , LLP , a law firm stacked with former employees of the FCC , the National Telecommunications and Information Administration ( NTIA ) , the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) and other state government positions .
The CTIA ’ s current President and CEO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spent the last two decades bouncing between lobbying for the telecoms and working for the government .
From 1998 to 2000 , Baker worked as Director of Congressional Affairs at the CTIA .
From 2004 to 2007 she served under the Bush administration as Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information and Acting Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration ( NTIA ) .
The NTIA is the President ’ s principal advisor on telecommunications and information policy .
Afterwards , she worked for the U.S. government as an FCC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
During her tenure at the FCC she was vocal about her opposition to net-neutrality regulations .
In January 2011 , she voted in favor of Comcast purchasing NBCUniversal .
Only four months later she would leave the FCC to take her position as senior vice president of government affairs at Comcast-NBCUniversal .
Finally , in 2014 – after spending a decade bouncing between lobbying for industry and working for the government – Baker went back to the CTIA , where she is now President and CEO , responsible for promoting the Race @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the CTIA has spread enthusiasm for the Race to 5g is by working with city officials .
The CTIA has honored City Mayors who have worked to erode local authority regarding the 5g roll out .
The 5G Wireless Champion Awards “ honor the state and local officials ” who “ bring next-generation 5G networks ” into communities and “ remove barriers to the deployment of next-generation wireless infrastructure ” .
In 2018 , the CTIA gave out 3 “ 5g Wireless Champion Awards ” to mayors across the United States , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The 5G Wireless Champion Awards are but one example of how the CTIA lobbies on behalf of the telecommunications industry , sometimes derisively known as Big Wireless .
The industry has achieved the nickname due a revolving door between the government agencies designed to regulate the cellular industry – namely , the Federal Communications Commission – and the industry itself .
This arrangement has allowed the telecoms to grow while facing little legal challenges or roadblocks .
In the process , this incestuous relationship has overtaken the voices and concerns of the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigative journalist Norm Alster for the Harvard Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics details the financial ties between the FCC and telecom companies and how the industry has direct access and power over the agency meant to regulate it .
The report , “ Captured Agency : How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates ” , details how the FCC , an independent government agency created in 1934 to regulate interstate communications by radio , television , wire , satellite and cable , has become a captured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government seats in a revolving door fashion similar to other federal agencies .
Regarding the passing of the 1996 Telecom Act – the act meant to regulate the developing mobile phone and internet infrastructure – Alster writes , Alster states that direct lobbying by industry is “ just one of many worms in a rotting apple ” .
His report says the FCC is involved in a network of powerful moneyed interests with limitless access and a variety of ways to shape policy .
Alster believes the worst part is that the wireless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and virtually unregulated , with fundamental questions on public health routinely ignored .
The Captured Agency report makes it clear that this type of corruption takes place because of “ the free flow of executive leadership between the FCC and the industries it presumably oversees ” .
For example , at the time of the report ’ s release , the Chairman of the FCC was Tom Wheeler , a man with deep ties to the wireless industry .
In 2013 , Wheeler was nominated as FCC chairman by former President Barack Obama @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his presidential campaigns .
Wheeler led the two most powerful industry lobbying groups : The National Cable & Telecommunications Association ( NCTA ) and the CTIA .
In 20 , Wheeler was also the head of the FCC during the debate around Net Neutrality .
Ajit Pai , current chairman of the FCC , is another example of this revolving door relationship .
Pai is an attorney who served as Associate General Counsel at Verizon Communications Inc. between 2001 and 2003 , where he handled competition and regulatory matters .
Pai was appointed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2012 and then made FCC Chairman by Donald Trump in January 2017 .
In an odd skit In February , Pai admitted that the FCC failed to protect Americans ’ privacy after it was revealed that at least two companies were gaining access to Americans ’ private data and selling it to law enforcement .
Pai called for a fine of over $ 200 million on AT & T , Verizon , T-Mobile , and Sprint .
“ This FCC will not tolerate phone companies putting Americans ’ privacy at risk , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is yet another example of a government official working closely with industry and maintaining relationships which clearly present conflicts of interest .
Carr is credited with accelerating the 5G build out .
Prior to joining the FCC , Carr worked as an attorney at Wiley Rein where his clients were Verizon , AT & T , Centurylink , and CTIA .
The Wiley Rein law firm is a hotbed of activity for former government officials and industry regulars .
One of the founders of the law firm is Richard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
According to Open Secrets , in the first four months of 2020 the Wiley Rein law firm has been retained by several telecoms , including AT & T for $ 80,000 , the CTIA for $ 50,000 , and Verizon for $ 30,000 .
For the last 15 years the law firm has spent at least $ 2 million dollars lobbying for their clients .
Open Secrets also shows the CTIA has spent $ 3 million on their own lobbying efforts .
On September 30 , 2019 , Commissioner Carr and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the future of 5G .
I interviewed Commissioner Carr about the concerns regarding his connections with the wireless industry , as well as the implications of the Captured Agency report released by Harvard ’ s School of Ethics .
Unfortunately , Mr Carr had no interest in addressing these questions and refused to answer my questions and only stated , “ We ’ re excited about the 5G build out and working with local leaders.
” The silence from FCC officials on the charges of corrupted regulators and ignored studies is simply another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government .
Again , the strongest influence over the U.S. regulatory agencies can be traced to the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association .
In 2018 , Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut exposed that Big Wireless and the FCC have failed to adequately fund independent studies into the health effects of emerging 5G technology .
At a Senate Commerce committee hearing , Blumenthal questioned Brad Gillen , Executive Director of the CTIA , about the absence of this research .
At the end of the exchange , Blumenthal concluded , “ So there really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re kind of flying blind here , as far as health and safety is concerned.
” One of the reasons Americans are “ flying blind ” , as Blumenthal stated , is because of a history of pressure and defunding of researchers who reached conclusions which were at odds with the official line of the wireless industry : cell phones and wireless devices do not cause harm to humans or animal life .
During the 1990 ’ s , biochemist Jerry Phillips was hired by cell phone giant Motorola to study the effects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phones .
Phillips previously worked with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ’ Pettis VA Medical Center in Loma Linda , California and is currently the director of the Excel Science Center at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs .
His team looked at the effects of different RF signals on rats and on cells in a dish .
In the documentary Public Exposure , Phillips says the relationship between him and his employer was initially cordial but soured once he submitted research data to Motorola which found that exposure to radio-frequency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the DNA structure .
The negative results were not to Motorola ’ s liking and they began putting pressure on him .
Phillips describes how Motorola was unwilling to accept his study and urged him not to publish it .
Despite the pleas , Phillips published his study in the Journal of Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics in 1998 and ceased his work with Motorola .
Phillips cautioned that independent research on cell phones is sparse because “ there is no money available for research other than what ’ s coming from industry.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influence research , Dr. Henry Lai , the University of Washington , and fellow researcher Narendra Singh were looking at the effects of nonionizing radiation – the same type of radiation emitted by cell phones and 5G – on the DNA of rats .
The researchers found that the DNA in the brain cells of the rats was broken by exposure to radiation .
Dr. Lai ’ s experiments showed negative health consequences at levels considered safe by the FCC .
After publishing the research in 1995 , Dr. Lai would later learn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discredit the experiments .
At some point Motorola became aware of Lai ’ s unpublished results showing harm from cell phone radiation .
In a leaked internal Motorola memo executives claimed to have succeeded in “ War-Gaming ” and undermining the Lai-Singh experiments .
Lai and Singh caused further controversy when they publicly complained that their funders , the Wireless Technology Research ( WTR ) program , had placed restrictions on their work..
In response to the complaints , George Carlo , the head of the WTR , sent a memo asking Richard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the time , to fire Lai and Singh .
McCormick refused , but a clear message had been sent to the researchers .
Once again , the fingerprints of the CTIA are found in this attempt at suppressing unfavorable studies .
Carlo had recently been appointed head of the WTR after the FCC and the CTIA promised to fund research into the dangers of cell phones .
The move came in 1993 after David Reynard sued the NEC America company because he blamed his wife ’ s lethal tumor on their phone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ national sensation , leading to a congressional investigation .
Wheeler claimed the new studies would “ re-validate the findings of the existing studies.
” Soon after , Carlo would ask the University of Washington to defund Lai for alleged violations of research protocols and Lai would accuse the WTR of interfering with his experiments .
Eventually , Carlo himself would have a falling out with the FCC and rebrand himself as a whistleblower .
He also accused the FCC and the CTIA of covering up evidence of cell phone harms .
Despite the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5G , the opposition has largely been derided as conspiracy theorists or quacks who don ’ t understand the electromagnetic spectrum .
In March 2019 , William Broad of the New York Times wrote a piece promoting the idea that those who are concerned about the health effects of 5G are simply falling prey to Russian propaganda designed to make America lose the Race to 5G .
His article , “ Your 5G Phone Won ’ t Hurt You .
But Russia Wants You to Think Otherwise.
” , sought to place the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shoulders of America ’ s favorite boogeyman – The Russians .
This practice seems to be a new trend for corporate media as the Washington Post announced a similar deal with ATT in November 2019 .
Questions regarding potential conflicts of interest have not been addressed between news outlets attacking those critical of 5G ’ s safety and telecom companies who fund them .
Interestingly , only a month after Broad ’ s article , in April 2019 the Times announced a partnership with Verizon to showcase a “ 5g journalism lab ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The 5G Health Hazard That Isn ’ t ” , attacking the critics of the rush to 5G and attempting to paint the opposition as being based on one single study which he says was found to be false .
Dr. Devra Davis , PhD , President of the Environmental Health Trust , responded to Broad ’ s claim by noting that “ by relegating concerns about 5G to a Russian ploy , he misses altogether the fact that the purportedly independent international authorities on which he relies that declare 5G to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ industry-loyal scientists .
China , Russia , Poland , Italy and several other European countries allow up to hundreds of times less wireless radiation into the environment from microwave antennas than does the U.S.. ” Davis went even further , comparing the treatment of those who raise awareness about the public impact of radio frequency microwave radiation to that of those scientists in the 1950 ’ s and 60 ’ s who attempted to ring alarm bells about the dangers of tobacco .
Davis wrote , These forces which “ sought to suppress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and influencing public policy on cellular technology for decades .
This cursory look at the history of the FCC , the CTIA , and the cell phone industry show clear conflicts of interests and suppression of research .
Now , these same forces are calling on the public to embrace the Race to 5G .
While most of the public is unaware of this history , understanding the corporate and lobbyist influence on the scientific research and light regulatory touch , is absolutely imperative as the world prepares to be surrounded by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ industry .
Meanwhile , we ’ ve been covering 5G and it ’ s effects and what it is for a while now .
• 5G : What You ’ re Not Being Told With Kate Shemirani & Mark Steele • 5G : The EMF Readings Are Off The Charts !
– New Study Links 5G & Coronavirus • 5G : As FCC Is Being Sued For Not Protecting Americans From Unsafe Radiation Levels , It ’ s Asking For Comments On Proposed RF Exposure Rules • Anti-5G Sentiment Produces Torched Telecom Towers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Come To Your Own Conclusions • Former Vodafone Boss Turned Pastor : 5G Dangers That Cause Flu Symptoms Is “ Largest Global Coverup In History ” • Doctor Hypothesizes Coronavirus Is Actually Effects Of 5G ( Video ) • The 5G Trojan Horse : Is This A Possible Explanation For Putting In Check The Coronavirus Narrative ?
• Gordon Chang Warning America About Chinese Huawei Tech Embedded In 5G Network To Surveil Americans • Why Are So Many Concerned About The Potential Health Dangers Of The 5G Cell Phone Network That Is Going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5G Cell Towers Over Concerns They Can Cause Cancer Isn ’ t it nice to know how easily the people of the US and the world can be sold out ?
Doesn ’ t that make you feel safer ?
If not , then the YouTube CEO should put your mind at ease when it comes to other perspectives on 5G , coronavirus and COVID-19 .
Like a good little lying Nazi , she outright says YouTube will remove anything that doesn ’ t agree with the narrative from the propagandized at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

The fascist-like way in which Big Wireless has gone about putting in the new 5G systems across the earth truly demonstrates conflicts of interests, suppression of valuable information regarding health risks to humans and lots of money for those involved. So, how were governments lobbied into such a thing? They wanted data collection of their citizens and surveillance on them… that’s right, they wanted Orwell’s 1984 in 2020.
Derrick Broze at MintPress News reports:
While selling 5G technology to the public as a means for faster downloads, Big Wireless — comprising a web of telecom companies, lobbyists and law firms– is spending millions to lobby governments the world over to implement the next generation of cellular technology because of its potential for data collection and surveillance of citizens. While the debate continues around 5G’s potential impact on human health, the environment and wildlife, often overlooked in the discussion about 5G is how the technology will be used for data collection and surveillance. Big Wireless has spent over three decades lobbying state powers to build this technology while selling it to the public as a means for faster downloads.
In that time the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association – an organization whose leadership has maintained a revolving door relationship with the U.S. Federal Communication Commission – has collaborated on or guided regulatory policy related to not only 5G, but the roll out of cell phones and other digital technology. The CTIA annually lobbies for the industry to the tune of millions of dollars, making them one of the most powerful telecom lobby groups.
The COVID19 pandemic has caused governments around the world to lockdown their nations, cancel public school sessions, and cost millions of people their jobs. Fears of spreading the virus and overloading the healthcare system are triggering an authoritarian response from many of these governments — including the United States. For many Americans, these aggressive measures have halted typical daily activities. Taking a trip to the gym, work, school, or out with friends – are no longer an option.
However, while most non-essential activities have stopped, the controversial expansion of the 5th generation of cellular infrastructure has continued. With the support and lobbying of the CTIA, Big Wireless’ 5G agenda is quickly expanding. Records from ProPublica show the CTIA lobbied for 2 recents bills related to 5G infrastructure.
On March 23, the 5G rollout took one step forward in the U.S. when President Donald Trump signed a bill aimed at “securing America’s 5G infrastructure.” The Secure 5G and Beyond Act calls for Congress to present a comprehensive plan for accelerating the nation’s 5G network “not later than 180 days.” The building of the next generation network has rapidly advanced due to the passing of the Secure 5G and Beyond Act and the Broadband Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability (DATA) Act, which passed the House in December 2019.
In April 2019, President Donald Trump held a press conference where he stated his intention to expand the U.S. wireless infrastructure as part of the effort to defeat China in the so-called “Race to 5G”. During the press conference Trump stood next to the head of the Federal Communications Commission and telecommunication employees as he declared, “The race to 5G is on and we must win.” While Trump is certain that America must win this apparent race – even during the middle of a pandemic – determining exactly who is the driving force behind the push towards the 5th generation of cellular technology requires digging through decades of lawsuits, industry corruption, and captured agencies.
In part I of this investigation, this report will take a deep dive into the web of Big Wireless, who those companies are, it’s lobbyists, law firms and industry as a whole that are spending millions of dollars pushing for 5G around the world. This report will expose the murky history of Big Wireless working within telecom companies that work with the US government to collect data on citizens, while also looking at how Big Wireless has worked to bully and silence critics who have expressed concern over its health impacts and civil liberties.
Part II of this series will look at how 5G will be used as a surveillance tool by governments to collect data on citizens and will work to fulfil the overall goal of creating a techno-tyranny state that should concern any American citizen that upholds their civil liberties.
What is 5g?
Over the last couple years telecom companies and governments have spent billions of dollars promoting, marketing, and building the next generation of telecom technology, known as 5G, or 5th Generation. The telecom companies involved in various aspects of the 5G rollout include Crowd Castle, American Tower, and Towerstream on the infrastructure side, and Comcast, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and AT&T on the internet/mobile service provider side.
Beginning with the introduction of 1G in 1979, a new generation of cellular standards has appeared approximately every ten years. Each generation is characterized by new frequency bands, higher data rates and non–backward compatible transmission technology. As we move into the 2020’s, the shift to the 5th generation has begun. Beginning in late 2018, cities like Houston, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Denver, San Diego, New York City, and Washington D.C. started deploying 5g for residential and commercial use.
While 5g is often touted as the solution to 4k movie downloads and virtual reality games, the new generation is also expected to herald the beginning of Smart Cities, where driverless cars, traffic lights, pollution sensors, smart phones and countless other smart devices interact in what is known as “The Internet of Things.” The IoT has raised alarm bells for some privacy advocates because it will involve surrounding the public with hundreds of thousands of interconnected devices and sensors which are gathering mass amounts of data that will be used for public advertising and monitoring of habits. 5G infrastructure will be the backbone to the IoT.
The switch from 4g to 5g is a change unlike those of previous generations. One notable difference is that 5G technology uses much higher frequencies, ranging from 10-300 GHZ. Currently, 4G wireless systems operate on 700 to 2700 MHz. 5g is using millimeter waves which do not travel far and are easily blocked by trees, buildings, and walls. Due to the nature of mm waves the FCC has stated that for 5G to operate successfully it will require the installation of hundreds of thousands of new cell sites, towers, and additions to existing infrastructure.
Due largely to the concerns about this exponential increase in towers (and the subsequent exposure to radiofrequency radiation) the 5G roll out has been opposed by thousands of doctors, scientists, health professionals, and even the U.S. military and branches of the U.S. government. The movement against the 5G roll out also sparked a global day of protest in January and April 2020. Meanwhile, nations like Sweden, Slovenia, and cities like Brussels, Belgium have decided to ban or temporarily halt the roll out of the new infrastructure until further health studies are conducted.
Who’s Behind the Race to 5G?
For the last year, Americans have been peppered with messages from telecommunications companies and the tech industry at large, stressing the importance of being first in the Race to 5G. We are told if we want driverless vehicles, robot assistants, cleaner and safer cities, and more convenient lives we must support and pay for the upgrades to 5G. Apparently, the public should also ignore the fact that this upgrade has sparked lawsuits over health, privacy, and local power concerns. But beyond being a lackluster marketing campaign to convince the public to adopt the next generation of cell phones and devices, what exactly is this race about?
Geopolitically speaking, the Race to 5g describes the ongoing rift between the U.S. and China, the new digital Cold War where these two superpowers race to implement the next generation of cellular technology because of its potential for massive profit and massive data collection.
The American mainstream media and President Trump have stated that Chinese company Huawei could use their 5g infrastructure to spy on Americans. Additionally, Trump has called on federal officials and American companies to abandon Huawei equipment. In January Foreign Policy wrote, “Because the (Chinese) companies that make the equipment are subservient to the Chinese government, they could be forced to include backdoors in the hardware or software to give Beijing remote access. Eavesdropping is also a risk, although efforts to listen in would almost certainly be detectable.”
This fear of Chinese spying using 5g equipment completely ignores the reality that the U.S. government has the same exact opportunity to pressure American companies to spy on the private data of Americans. Foreign Policy noted, “These insecurities are a result of market forces that prioritize costs over security and of governments, including the United States, that want to preserve the option of surveillance in 5G networks. If the United States is serious about tackling the national security threats related to an insecure 5G network, it needs to rethink the extent to which it values corporate profits and government espionage over security.”
Whether the public is actually demanding faster downloads is up for debate, but what is not debatable is that the telecoms, global governments, and the tech industry are pushing the shift towards 5g. While it is true that 5g has the potential to spur on innovation in the fields of medicine, manufacturing, entertainment, and other industries – it seems much of the hype around the 5G rollout is coming from the telecommunication industry itself, specifically the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, or CTIA.
Established in 1984, the CTIA claims to represent the U.S. wireless communications industry, from carriers and equipment manufacturers. The CTIA “advocates for legislative and regulatory policies at federal, state, and local levels that foster the continued innovation, investment and increasing economic impact of America’s wireless industry. CTIA is active on a wide range of issues including spectrum policy, wireless infrastructure, and the Internet of Things, among others.” They also host events on topics ranging from cybersecurity to 5G.
The CTIA’s Board of Directors includes the presidents, CEOs and other senior officials of Verizon, Sprint, T Mobile, Nokia, Erricson, Intel, General Motors, Tracfone, EZ Texting and others. Brad Gillen, the current Executive Vice President of the CTIA, was formerly a Legal Advisor to a former FCC Commissioner and served in other senior policy roles at the FCC and with DISH Network. Mr. Gillen was also a partner at Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP, a law firm stacked with former employees of the FCC, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and other state government positions.
The CTIA’s current President and CEO is Meredith Attwell Baker. Baker has spent the last two decades bouncing between lobbying for the telecoms and working for the government. From 1998 to 2000, Baker worked as Director of Congressional Affairs at the CTIA. From 2004 to 2007 she served under the Bush administration as Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information and Acting Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). The NTIA is the President’s principal advisor on telecommunications and information policy. Afterwards, she worked for the U.S. government as an FCC Commissioner between July 2009 to June 2011. During her tenure at the FCC she was vocal about her opposition to net-neutrality regulations. In January 2011, she voted in favor of Comcast purchasing NBCUniversal. Only four months later she would leave the FCC to take her position as senior vice president of government affairs at Comcast-NBCUniversal. Finally, in 2014 – after spending a decade bouncing between lobbying for industry and working for the government – Baker went back to the CTIA, where she is now President and CEO, responsible for promoting the Race to 5G.
One of the ways the CTIA has spread enthusiasm for the Race to 5g is by working with city officials. The CTIA has honored City Mayors who have worked to erode local authority regarding the 5g roll out. The 5G Wireless Champion Awards “honor the state and local officials” who “bring next-generation 5G networks” into communities and “remove barriers to the deployment of next-generation wireless infrastructure”. In 2018, the CTIA gave out 3 “5g Wireless Champion Awards” to mayors across the United States, including Houston’s Mayor Sylvester Turner.
The 5G Wireless Champion Awards are but one example of how the CTIA lobbies on behalf of the telecommunications industry, sometimes derisively known as Big Wireless. The industry has achieved the nickname due a revolving door between the government agencies designed to regulate the cellular industry – namely, the Federal Communications Commission – and the industry itself. This arrangement has allowed the telecoms to grow while facing little legal challenges or roadblocks. In the process, this incestuous relationship has overtaken the voices and concerns of the American people.
A 2015 expose published by investigative journalist Norm Alster for the Harvard Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics details the financial ties between the FCC and telecom companies and how the industry has direct access and power over the agency meant to regulate it. The report, “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is Dominated by the Industries it Presumably Regulates”, details how the FCC, an independent government agency created in 1934 to regulate interstate communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable, has become a captured agency with Big Wireless leaders filling the government seats in a revolving door fashion similar to other federal agencies.
Regarding the passing of the 1996 Telecom Act – the act meant to regulate the developing mobile phone and internet infrastructure – Alster writes,
Late lobbying won the wireless industry enormous concessions from lawmakers, many of them major recipients of industry hard and soft dollar contributions. Congressional staffers who helped lobbyists write the new law did not go unrewarded. Thirteen of fifteen staffers later became lobbyists themselves.”
Alster states that direct lobbying by industry is “just one of many worms in a rotting apple”. His report says the FCC is involved in a network of powerful moneyed interests with limitless access and a variety of ways to shape policy. Alster believes the worst part is that the wireless industry has been allowed to grow unchecked and virtually unregulated, with fundamental questions on public health routinely ignored. The Captured Agency report makes it clear that this type of corruption takes place because of “the free flow of executive leadership between the FCC and the industries it presumably oversees”.
For example, at the time of the report’s release, the Chairman of the FCC was Tom Wheeler, a man with deep ties to the wireless industry. In 2013, Wheeler was nominated as FCC chairman by former President Barack Obama after raising more than $700,000 for his presidential campaigns. Wheeler led the two most powerful industry lobbying groups: The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) and the CTIA. In 20, Wheeler was also the head of the FCC during the debate around Net Neutrality.
Ajit Pai, current chairman of the FCC, is another example of this revolving door relationship. Pai is an attorney who served as Associate General Counsel at Verizon Communications Inc. between 2001 and 2003, where he handled competition and regulatory matters. Pai was appointed to the FCC by Barack Obama in 2012 and then made FCC Chairman by Donald Trump in January 2017. In an odd skit
In February, Pai admitted that the FCC failed to protect Americans’ privacy after it was revealed that at least two companies were gaining access to Americans’ private data and selling it to law enforcement. Pai called for a fine of over $200 million on AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint. “This FCC will not tolerate phone companies putting Americans’ privacy at risk,” Pai stated when announcing the fine.
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is yet another example of a government official working closely with industry and maintaining relationships which clearly present conflicts of interest. Carr is credited with accelerating the 5G build out. Prior to joining the FCC, Carr worked as an attorney at Wiley Rein where his clients were Verizon, AT&T, Centurylink, and CTIA.
The Wiley Rein law firm is a hotbed of activity for former government officials and industry regulars. One of the founders of the law firm is Richard Wiley, himself a Former FCC Chairman. According to Open Secrets, in the first four months of 2020 the Wiley Rein law firm has been retained by several telecoms, including AT&T for $80,000, the CTIA for $50,000, and Verizon for $30,000. For the last 15 years the law firm has spent at least $2 million dollars lobbying for their clients. Open Secrets also shows the CTIA has spent $3 million on their own lobbying efforts.
On September 30, 2019, Commissioner Carr and other FCC officials were in Houston to discuss the future of 5G. I interviewed Commissioner Carr about the concerns regarding his connections with the wireless industry, as well as the implications of the Captured Agency report released by Harvard’s School of Ethics. Unfortunately, Mr Carr had no interest in addressing these questions and refused to answer my questions and only stated, “We’re excited about the 5G build out and working with local leaders.”
The silence from FCC officials on the charges of corrupted regulators and ignored studies is simply another facet of the relationship between industry and government. Again, the strongest influence over the U.S. regulatory agencies can be traced to the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association.
A History of Big Wireless Bullying and Corruption
In 2018, Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut exposed that Big Wireless and the FCC have failed to adequately fund independent studies into the health effects of emerging 5G technology. At a Senate Commerce committee hearing, Blumenthal questioned Brad Gillen, Executive Director of the CTIA, about the absence of this research.
How much money has the industry committed to supporting additional independent research—I stress independent—research? And we’re talking about research on the biological effects of this new technology,” Blumenthal asked. To which Gillen responded, “There are no industry backed studies to my knowledge right now.”
At the end of the exchange, Blumenthal concluded, “So there really is no research ongoing. We’re kind of flying blind here, as far as health and safety is concerned.”
One of the reasons Americans are “flying blind”, as Blumenthal stated, is because of a history of pressure and defunding of researchers who reached conclusions which were at odds with the official line of the wireless industry: cell phones and wireless devices do not cause harm to humans or animal life.
During the 1990’s, biochemist Jerry Phillips was hired by cell phone giant Motorola to study the effects of the radiofrequency radiation emitted by cell phones. Phillips previously worked with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Pettis VA Medical Center in Loma Linda, California and is currently the director of the Excel Science Center at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. His team looked at the effects of different RF signals on rats and on cells in a dish. In the documentary Public Exposure, Phillips says the relationship between him and his employer was initially cordial but soured once he submitted research data to Motorola which found that exposure to radio-frequency radiation produced by cell phones caused damage to the DNA structure. The negative results were not to Motorola’s liking and they began putting pressure on him.
These folks were very, very upset, and began to talk about how they are going to handle this, what sort of spin can we put on this, what can we expect from this. From that point on the relationship changed,” Phillips states in the documentary. “What we saw was that Motorola began to exert more and more control over the work. Telling us what to do, telling us how to write abstracts, what to say in the abstracts, what to say in the papers, how to do the work. No, don’t do this. Yes, do it this way. This was unacceptable.”
Phillips describes how Motorola was unwilling to accept his study and urged him not to publish it. Despite the pleas, Phillips published his study in the Journal of Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics in 1998 and ceased his work with Motorola. Phillips cautioned that independent research on cell phones is sparse because “there is no money available for research other than what’s coming from industry.”
In another example of industry attempting to influence research, Dr. Henry Lai, the University of Washington, and fellow researcher Narendra Singh were looking at the effects of nonionizing radiation – the same type of radiation emitted by cell phones and 5G – on the DNA of rats. The researchers found that the DNA in the brain cells of the rats was broken by exposure to radiation. Dr. Lai’s experiments showed negative health consequences at levels considered safe by the FCC.
After publishing the research in 1995, Dr. Lai would later learn of a “full-scale effort” to discredit the experiments. At some point Motorola became aware of Lai’s unpublished results showing harm from cell phone radiation. In a leaked internal Motorola memo executives claimed to have succeeded in “War-Gaming ” and undermining the Lai-Singh experiments. Lai and Singh caused further controversy when they publicly complained that their funders, the Wireless Technology Research (WTR) program, had placed restrictions on their work.. In response to the complaints, George Carlo, the head of the WTR, sent a memo asking Richard McCormick, president of University of Washington at the time, to fire Lai and Singh. McCormick refused, but a clear message had been sent to the researchers.
This shocked me. The letter trying to discredit me, the ‘war games’ memo,” Lai told Seattle Mag. “As a scientist doing research, I was not expecting to be involved in a political situation. It opened my eyes on how games are played in the world of business. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you. The pressure is very impressive.”
Once again, the fingerprints of the CTIA are found in this attempt at suppressing unfavorable studies. Carlo had recently been appointed head of the WTR after the FCC and the CTIA promised to fund research into the dangers of cell phones. The move came in 1993 after David Reynard sued the NEC America company because he blamed his wife’s lethal tumor on their phone. Reynard’s story became a national sensation, leading to a congressional investigation. Wheeler claimed the new studies would “re-validate the findings of the existing studies.” Soon after, Carlo would ask the University of Washington to defund Lai for alleged violations of research protocols and Lai would accuse the WTR of interfering with his experiments. Eventually, Carlo himself would have a falling out with the FCC and rebrand himself as a whistleblower. He also accused the FCC and the CTIA of covering up evidence of cell phone harms.
5G Conspiracy Theorists?
Despite the diverse credentials of the mass movement against 5G, the opposition has largely been derided as conspiracy theorists or quacks who don’t understand the electromagnetic spectrum. In March 2019, William Broad of the New York Times wrote a piece promoting the idea that those who are concerned about the health effects of 5G are simply falling prey to Russian propaganda designed to make America lose the Race to 5G. His article, “Your 5G Phone Won’t Hurt You. But Russia Wants You to Think Otherwise.”, sought to place the blame for concern around 5G on the shoulders of America’s favorite boogeyman – The Russians.
This practice seems to be a new trend for corporate media as the Washington Post announced a similar deal with ATT in November 2019. Questions regarding potential conflicts of interest have not been addressed between news outlets attacking those critical of 5G’s safety and telecom companies who fund them.
Interestingly, only a month after Broad’s article, in April 2019 the Times announced a partnership with Verizon to showcase a “5g journalism lab”. Broad wrote a second piece titled “The 5G Health Hazard That Isn’t”, attacking the critics of the rush to 5G and attempting to paint the opposition as being based on one single study which he says was found to be false.
Dr. Devra Davis, PhD, President of the Environmental Health Trust, responded to Broad’s claim by noting that “by relegating concerns about 5G to a Russian ploy, he misses altogether the fact that the purportedly independent international authorities on which he relies that declare 5G to be safe are an exclusive club of industry-loyal scientists. China, Russia, Poland, Italy and several other European countries allow up to hundreds of times less wireless radiation into the environment from microwave antennas than does the U.S..”
Davis went even further, comparing the treatment of those who raise awareness about the public impact of radio frequency microwave radiation to that of those scientists in the 1950’s and 60’s who attempted to ring alarm bells about the dangers of tobacco. Davis wrote,
Scientists who showed the harmful impacts of tobacco found themselves struggling for serious attention and financial support. For health impacts from wireless radiation, a similar pattern is emerging. Each time a U.S. government agency produced positive findings, research on health impacts was defunded. The Office of Naval Research, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the Environmental Protection Agency all once had vibrant research programs documenting dangers of wireless radiation. All found their programs scrapped, reflecting pressure from those who sought to suppress this work.”
These forces which “sought to suppress this work” have indeed been operating and influencing public policy on cellular technology for decades.
This cursory look at the history of the FCC, the CTIA, and the cell phone industry show clear conflicts of interests and suppression of research. Now, these same forces are calling on the public to embrace the Race to 5G. While most of the public is unaware of this history, understanding the corporate and lobbyist influence on the scientific research and light regulatory touch, is absolutely imperative as the world prepares to be surrounded by the devices and infrastructure of the emerging 5G industry.
Meanwhile, we’ve been covering 5G and it’s effects and what it is for a while now.
Isn’t it nice to know how easily the people of the US and the world can be sold out? Doesn’t that make you feel safer?
If not, then the YouTube CEO should put your mind at ease when it comes to other perspectives on 5G, coronavirus and COVID-19. Like a good little lying Nazi, she outright says YouTube will remove anything that doesn’t agree with the narrative from the propagandized at the World Health Organization.
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-05-13--John Brennan: The Traitor-in-Chief

John Brennan: The Traitor-in-Chief

There is no doubt that Obama ’ s Islamic convert stooge John Brennan is a traitor to the US .
There ’ s lots of evidence to attest to this fact .
• Obama ’ s Communist Stooge John Brennan Suppressed High-Quality Intelligence That Putin Wanted Clinton To Win In 2016 • John Brennan Engages In Sedition On Twitter – Gets Called Out For His Own Treason Over at Discover the Networks , they ’ ve just put out a very informative piece about Brennan .
Take a look .
Brad Johnson , a retired 25-year veteran officer of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he has seen our nation ’ s Intelligence Community “ turn away from its core responsibilities ” – i.e.
, promoting “ the safety and security of all Americans ” – and embrace “ a far more political agenda.
” He notes , for example , that the Intelligence Community ’ s 2017 quadrennial report about global trends “ overwhelmingly ” supports “ global government integration ” and the “ globalist movement , ” which he describes as “ a hardcore leftist philosophy that is deeply political ” and antithetical to the concept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manifestation of this new globalist philosophy , says Johnson , was former CIA Director John Brennan ’ s so-called “ modernization ” plan , which “ systematically dismantled and destroyed the CIA ’ s operations division — the heart of the agency ’ s central mission of using people to steal vital secrets around the world.
” Brennan himself articulated this new mindset when he flatly told National Public Radio in an interview : “ We don ’ t steal secrets.
” “ The Brennan plan , ” says Johnson , “ instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to provide the CIA with spies as intelligence collectors.
” This approach made it impossible for the U.S. to keep its intelligence-gathering operations clandestine , thereby forfeiting the type of secrecy that is “ fundamental to the credibility and reliability of the information ” collected .
In light of the recent highly disturbing revelations about Obamagate , and in light of the damage that John Brennan in particular has done to America ’ s intelligence-gathering capacity and , by extension , to its national security , a closer look at the former CIA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deceit , lies , and bad judgment is most certainly in order .
When Brennan was just 21 years old and attending Fordham University in New York , he voted for Communist Party USA ( CPUSA ) presidential nominee Gus Hall in the 1976 U.S. presidential election .
As historian Ron Radosh points out , “ The CPUSA at that time was dedicated to gaining support for Soviet foreign policy , with the intent of defeating the United States in the Cold War… .
Moscow regularly gave Hall thousands of dollars to enable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their work.
” In 1980 Brennan earned an M.A .
in government from the University of Texas .
In his graduate thesis , he denied the existence of “ absolute human rights ” and argued that “ since the press can play such an influential role in determining the perceptions of the masses , ” he was “ in favor of some degree of government censorship.
” Also in 1980 , Brennan joined the CIA as an intelligence director , and in the ’ 90s he served a stint as a daily intelligence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1998 he played a key role in preventing an American operation that would have killed or captured Osama bin Laden , and instead he advised the U.S. to let Saudi Arabia deal with the al Qaeda leader .
A few months later , bin Laden masterminded the deadly bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa ; three years after that , he carried out the 9/11 attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon .
In a 2006 interview on C-SPAN , Brennan spoke of the Islamic terrorist group Hezbollah as an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ negotiating table along with the representatives of national governments from across the globe : “ It would be nice to be able to put Hezbollah in a category of being totally evil , but Hezbollah as an organization is a very complex one that has a terrorist arm to it .
It has a social and political nature to it as well.
” In a paper he published in July 2008 , Brennan stated that he saw the recent increase of political involvement by Hezbollah as a very positive development : “ Not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fully vested player in the Lebanese political system has been accompanied by a marked reduction in terrorist attacks carried out by the organization .
The best hope for maintaining this trend and for reducing the influence of violent extremists within the organization … is to increase Hezbollah ’ s stake in Lebanon ’ s struggling democratic processes.
” In August 2009 , Brennan said he was “ pleased to see that a lot of Hezbollah individuals are in fact renouncing … terrorism and violence and are trying to participate in the political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Hamas , ” he added , had “ started out as a very focused social organization that was providing welfare to Palestinians , ” but eventually “ developed an extremist and terrorist element ” that “ unfortunately delegitimized it in the eyes of many ” and diminished the chances of the Palestinian people getting “ what they truly deserve , which is a Palestinian state side-by-side with Israel.
” When news of the George W. Bush administration ’ s warrantless wiretapping initiative made headlines in late 2005 , Brennan defended the practice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the program “ should be granted … immunity , because they were told to [ participate ] by the appropriate authorities that were operating in a legal context.
” Brennan also supported “ enhanced interrogation ” techniques , and he described “ extraordinary rendition ” as “ an absolutely vital tool ” that “ without a doubt has been very successful as far as producing intelligence that has saved lives.
” In a 2007 interview with CBS News , Brennan stated that waterboarding in particular was a highly useful practice that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ departed from all of those positions when he served as a senior advisor to Barack Obama ‘ s 2008 presidential campaign .
In a letter to Obama , for example , Brennan called himself “ a strong opponent of many of the policies of the Bush administration , such as the preemptive war in Iraq and coercive interrogation tactics , to include waterboarding.
” In August 2009 , Brennan said that tactics like waterboarding were not only inconsistent with “ our ideals as a nation , ” but also “ undermine our national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recruitment bonanza for terrorists , increase the determination of our enemies , and decrease the willingness of other nations to cooperate with us.
” In 2009 as well , Brennan detailed for the first time the Obama administration ’ s decision to dispense with the term “ global war on terror.
” Emphasizing the need to target “ extremists ” rather than “ jihadists , ” Brennan explained that “ jihad ” means “ to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal.
” The use of that term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these murderers the religious legitimacy they desperately seek but in no way deserve .
Worse , it risks reinforcing the idea that the United States is somehow at war with Islam itself.
” On Christmas Day 2009 , Nigerian al Qaeda operative Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted , unsuccessfully , to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight ( from Amsterdam to Detroit ) in midair with a powerful chemical bomb .
In the aftermath of the incident , Brennan explained that the Obama administration would treat it as a law-enforcement matter rather than as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the perpetrator would be offered a plea agreement in exchange for information about al Qaeda operations in Yemen ; and that if such an agreement could not be worked out , Abdulmutallab would be tried in a federal civilian court rather than in a military tribunal .
Brennan sought to try 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in a civilian court as well , stating , in a February 2010 speech to Islamic law students at New York University , that “ we need to bring him to justice in an American court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abandoned , due to the plan ’ s unpopularity with the U.S. public .
On March 17 , 2011 , forty-two Pakistanis — mostly civilians — were killed in a major CIA drone strike on the town of Datta Khel in North Waziristan .
The incident was widely reported by the media and was angrily denounced by Pakistan ’ s government .
An anonymous U.S. official later justified the attack as one that had targeted “ a large group of heavily armed men , some of whom were clearly connected to Al Qaeda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acted in a manner consistent with AQ-linked militants.
” But in fact , the gathering was eventually confirmed to have been a jirga , or tribal meeting , convened to address a local mining-related dispute .
The dead included dozens of tribal elders and local policemen , as well as a small number of Taliban .
But three months later , in a June 29 speech , Brennan claimed that the March 17 drone attack had not resulted in even “ a single collateral death.
” In fact , he went even further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ types of operations… that the U.S. has been involved in , in the counter-terrorism realm , that nearly for the past year there hasn ’ t been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency , precision of the capabilities that we ’ ve been able to develop.
” Brennan ’ s claim was untrue , however , as noted in a report by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism ( BIJ ) : “ The Datta Khel attack was not the only time that civilians had died in the period referred to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporter Rahimullah Yusufzai and field researchers in the tribal areas , the Bureau identified and published details of 45 civilians known at the time to have been killed by CIA drones in ten strikes between August 2010 and June 2011 , the date of Brennan ’ s speech .
Many of those killed had died at Datta Khel.
” On October 19 , 2011 , Farhana Khera , president and executive director of the organization Muslim Advocates , sent Brennan a letter charging that the FBI was a bigoted agency which kept “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Islam ” on its intranet , and that some of the Bureau ’ s new recruits were being taught “ that Islam is a religion that ‘ transforms a country ’ s culture into 7th-century Arabian ways.
’ ” Within two weeks , Brennan capitulated to Khera ’ s demand that America ’ s intelligence agencies eliminate their “ offensive ” curriculum/training materials ; i.e.
, he called for a purge of any and all materials that made reference to “ jihad ” or “ radical Islam.
” Speaking in June 2011 about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terrorism following the recent death of Osama bin Laden , Brennan dismissed any notion that Islamic terrorists might attempt to build a caliphate in the Middle East .
“ Our strategy is shaped by a deeper understanding of al-Qaeda ’ s goals , strategy and tactics that we have gained over the last decade , ” said Brennan .
“ I ’ m not talking about al-Qaeda ’ s grandiose vision of global domination through a violent Islamic caliphate .
That vision is absurd , and we are not going to organize our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is never going to happen… .
We are not going to elevate these thugs and their murderous aspirations into something larger than they really are.
” Events over the ensuing three years , however , would prove Brennan wrong .
On June 29 , 2014 , ISIS announced the existence of what it called a new Islamic caliphate that would thenceforth go by the name “ Islamic State ” and would recognize no existing national borders .
By November 2014 , the organization controlled some 100,000 square kilometers of territory in the Middle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was involved in crafting the false talking points that then-Secretary of State Susan Rice delivered during five separate television interviews regarding the 9/11/12 terrorist attack against a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi , Libya .
Specifically , Rice claimed that according to the “ best information at present , ” the deadly attack was not premeditated , but rather , was a “ spontaneous reaction ” to “ a hateful and offensive [ anti-Islamic ] video that was widely disseminated throughout the Arab and Muslim world.
” In March 2014 , Senator Dianne @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that was involved in a multi-year probe of the CIA ’ s use of harsh interrogation measures against suspected terrorists during the Bush Administration—went to the Senate floor and angrily accused the Agency of having hacked into the computers of her Committee staffers .
In response , Brennan expressed dismay that “ some members of the Senate ” were making “ spurious allegations about CIA actions that are wholly unsupported by the facts.
” Moreover , he told NBC ’ s Andrea Mitchell : “ As far as the allegations of the CIA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be further from the truth .
We wouldn ’ t do that .
I mean , that ’ s just beyond the , you know , the scope of reason in terms of what we do.
” Brennan likewise told the media that “ a lot of people who are claiming that there has been this tremendous sort of spying and monitoring and hacking will be proved wrong.
” But according to the findings of a CIA inspector general ’ s report that was released on July 31 , 2014 , it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The report indicated that five CIA employees—two attorneys and three computer specialists—indeed had surreptitiously and unlawfully searched files and emails on the computers of the aforementioned Senate investigators .
In response to the report , Brennan apologized to Senate Intelligence Committee leaders .
In a March 2015 speech at the Council on Foreign Relations , Brennan refused to refer to the Islamic State ( ISIS ) terror group as an “ Islamic ” entity .
“ By ascribing [ sic ] it as a Muslim terrorism or Islamic extremism , ” he said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ give them the type of Islamic legitimacy that they are so desperately seeking , but which they don ’ t deserve at all.
” In May 2017 , Brennan lied to Congress when he testified that : ( a ) he did not know who had commissioned the infamous Steele dossier which contained many false accusations against Donald Trump and his political allies , and ( b ) the CIA had not relied on the dossier ’ s contents for any action that the Agency took .
In July 2018 , Brennan was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remarks at a joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki .
At that event , Trump expressed doubt about a U.S. Intelligence Community assessment claiming that Russian operatives had interfered in America ’ s 2016 presidential election , and he suggested that he had at least as much faith in the Russian KGB as he had in the American CIA .
Later that day , Brennan described Trump ’ s comments as “ nothing short of treasonous.
” In August 2018 , President Trump revoked Brennan ’ s security clearance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lying and recent conduct characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary ” was “ wholly inconsistent with access to the nation ’ s most closely held secrets and facilities , the very aim of our adversaries , which is to sow division and chaos.
” In response , Brennan told NBC ’ s Meet the Press that Trump ’ s move was “ treasonous.
” In a February 2020 interview on MSNBC , Brennan said that President Trump ’ s staunchest supporters are a “ very debased group of people.
” In light of John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ America ’ s national security by downplaying the extent of the threat posed by our nation ’ s most committed enemies , it is no wonder that he detests President Trump .
In virtually every way possible , Trump is the anti-Brennan .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

There is no doubt that Obama’s Islamic convert stooge John Brennan is a traitor to the US. There’s lots of evidence to attest to this fact.
Over at Discover the Networks, they’ve just put out a very informative piece about Brennan. Take a look.
Brad Johnson, a retired 25-year veteran officer of the CIA, laments that in recent years he has seen our nation’s Intelligence Community “turn away from its core responsibilities” – i.e., promoting “the safety and security of all Americans” – and embrace “a far more political agenda.” He notes, for example, that the Intelligence Community’s 2017 quadrennial report about global trends “overwhelmingly” supports “global government integration” and the “globalist movement,” which he describes as “a hardcore leftist philosophy that is deeply political” and antithetical to the concept of national sovereignty.
A particularly odious manifestation of this new globalist philosophy, says Johnson, was former CIA Director John Brennan’s so-called “modernization” plan, which “systematically dismantled and destroyed the CIA’s operations division — the heart of the agency’s central mission of using people to steal vital secrets around the world.” Brennan himself articulated this new mindset when he flatly told National Public Radio in an interview: “We don’t steal secrets.” “The Brennan plan,” says Johnson, “instead called for other nations’ intelligence services to provide the CIA with spies as intelligence collectors.” This approach made it impossible for the U.S. to keep its intelligence-gathering operations clandestine, thereby forfeiting the type of secrecy that is “fundamental to the credibility and reliability of the information” collected.
In light of the recent highly disturbing revelations about Obamagate, and in light of the damage that John Brennan in particular has done to America’s intelligence-gathering capacity and, by extension, to its national security, a closer look at the former CIA Director’s long track record of deceit, lies, and bad judgment is most certainly in order.
When Brennan was just 21 years old and attending Fordham University in New York, he voted for Communist Party USA (CPUSA) presidential nominee Gus Hall in the 1976 U.S. presidential election. As historian Ron Radosh points out, “The CPUSA at that time was dedicated to gaining support for Soviet foreign policy, with the intent of defeating the United States in the Cold War…. Moscow regularly gave Hall thousands of dollars to enable the Communists in America to carry on their work.”
In 1980 Brennan earned an M.A. in government from the University of Texas. In his graduate thesis, he denied the existence of “absolute human rights” and argued that “since the press can play such an influential role in determining the perceptions of the masses,” he was “in favor of some degree of government censorship.”
Also in 1980, Brennan joined the CIA as an intelligence director, and in the ’90s he served a stint as a daily intelligence briefer for President Bill Clinton. In 1998 he played a key role in preventing an American operation that would have killed or captured Osama bin Laden, and instead he advised the U.S. to let Saudi Arabia deal with the al Qaeda leader. A few months later, bin Laden masterminded the deadly bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa; three years after that, he carried out the 9/11 attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
In a 2006 interview on C-SPAN, Brennan spoke of the Islamic terrorist group Hezbollah as an entity that merited a seat at the negotiating table along with the representatives of national governments from across the globe: “It would be nice to be able to put Hezbollah in a category of being totally evil, but Hezbollah as an organization is a very complex one that has a terrorist arm to it. It has a social and political nature to it as well.”
In a paper he published in July 2008, Brennan stated that he saw the recent increase of political involvement by Hezbollah as a very positive development: “Not coincidentally, the evolution of Hezbollah into a fully vested player in the Lebanese political system has been accompanied by a marked reduction in terrorist attacks carried out by the organization. The best hope for maintaining this trend and for reducing the influence of violent extremists within the organization … is to increase Hezbollah’s stake in Lebanon’s struggling democratic processes.”
In August 2009, Brennan said he was “pleased to see that a lot of Hezbollah individuals are in fact renouncing … terrorism and violence and are trying to participate in the political process in a very legitimate fashion.” “Hamas,” he added, had “started out as a very focused social organization that was providing welfare to Palestinians,” but eventually “developed an extremist and terrorist element” that “unfortunately delegitimized it in the eyes of many” and diminished the chances of the Palestinian people getting “what they truly deserve, which is a Palestinian state side-by-side with Israel.”
When news of the George W. Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping initiative made headlines in late 2005, Brennan defended the practice and maintained that the telecommunication companies participating in the program “should be granted … immunity, because they were told to [participate] by the appropriate authorities that were operating in a legal context.” Brennan also supported “enhanced interrogation” techniques, and he described “extraordinary rendition” as “an absolutely vital tool” that “without a doubt has been very successful as far as producing intelligence that has saved lives.” In a 2007 interview with CBS News, Brennan stated that waterboarding in particular was a highly useful practice that “ has saved lives.”
But Brennan subsequently departed from all of those positions when he served as a senior advisor to Barack Obama‘s 2008 presidential campaign. In a letter to Obama, for example, Brennan called himself “a strong opponent of many of the policies of the Bush administration, such as the preemptive war in Iraq and coercive interrogation tactics, to include waterboarding.” In August 2009, Brennan said that tactics like waterboarding were not only inconsistent with “our ideals as a nation,” but also “undermine our national security” because they “are a recruitment bonanza for terrorists, increase the determination of our enemies, and decrease the willingness of other nations to cooperate with us.”
In 2009 as well, Brennan detailed for the first time the Obama administration’s decision to dispense with the term “global war on terror.” Emphasizing the need to target “extremists” rather than “jihadists,” Brennan explained that “jihad” means “to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal.” The use of that term, he elaborated, “risks giving these murderers the religious legitimacy they desperately seek but in no way deserve. Worse, it risks reinforcing the idea that the United States is somehow at war with Islam itself.”
On Christmas Day 2009, Nigerian al Qaeda operative Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted, unsuccessfully, to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight (from Amsterdam to Detroit) in midair with a powerful chemical bomb. In the aftermath of the incident, Brennan explained that the Obama administration would treat it as a law-enforcement matter rather than as an act of war or terrorism; that the perpetrator would be offered a plea agreement in exchange for information about al Qaeda operations in Yemen; and that if such an agreement could not be worked out, Abdulmutallab would be tried in a federal civilian court rather than in a military tribunal.
Brennan sought to try 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in a civilian court as well, stating, in a February 2010 speech to Islamic law students at New York University, that “we need to bring him to justice in an American court”—a goal the Obama administration eventually abandoned, due to the plan’s unpopularity with the U.S. public.
On March 17, 2011, forty-two Pakistanis — mostly civilians — were killed in a major CIA drone strike on the town of Datta Khel in North Waziristan. The incident was widely reported by the media and was angrily denounced by Pakistan’s government. An anonymous U.S. official later justified the attack as one that had targeted “a large group of heavily armed men, some of whom were clearly connected to Al Qaeda [AQ] and all of whom acted in a manner consistent with AQ-linked militants.” But in fact, the gathering was eventually confirmed to have been a jirga, or tribal meeting, convened to address a local mining-related dispute. The dead included dozens of tribal elders and local policemen, as well as a small number of Taliban.
But three months later, in a June 29 speech, Brennan claimed that the March 17 drone attack had not resulted in even “a single collateral death.” In fact, he went even further: “I can say that the types of operations… that the U.S. has been involved in, in the counter-terrorism realm, that nearly for the past year there hasn’t been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency, precision of the capabilities that we’ve been able to develop.”
Brennan’s claim was untrue, however, as noted in a report by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ): “The Datta Khel attack was not the only time that civilians had died in the period referred to by Brennan. Working with veteran Pakistani reporter Rahimullah Yusufzai and field researchers in the tribal areas, the Bureau identified and published details of 45 civilians known at the time to have been killed by CIA drones in ten strikes between August 2010 and June 2011, the date of Brennan’s speech. Many of those killed had died at Datta Khel.”
On October 19, 2011, Farhana Khera, president and executive director of the organization Muslim Advocates, sent Brennan a letter charging that the FBI was a bigoted agency which kept “antiquated and offensive documents about Muslims and Islam” on its intranet, and that some of the Bureau’s new recruits were being taught “that Islam is a religion that ‘transforms a country’s culture into 7th-century Arabian ways.’” Within two weeks, Brennan capitulated to Khera’s demand that America’s intelligence agencies eliminate their “offensive” curriculum/training materials; i.e., he called for a purge of any and all materials that made reference to “jihad” or “radical Islam.”
Speaking in June 2011 about how the Obama administration would deal with terrorism following the recent death of Osama bin Laden, Brennan dismissed any notion that Islamic terrorists might attempt to build a caliphate in the Middle East. “Our strategy is shaped by a deeper understanding of al-Qaeda’s goals, strategy and tactics that we have gained over the last decade,” said Brennan. “I’m not talking about al-Qaeda’s grandiose vision of global domination through a violent Islamic caliphate. That vision is absurd, and we are not going to organize our counter-terrorist polices against a feckless delusion that is never going to happen…. We are not going to elevate these thugs and their murderous aspirations into something larger than they really are.”
Events over the ensuing three years, however, would prove Brennan wrong. On June 29, 2014, ISIS announced the existence of what it called a new Islamic caliphate that would thenceforth go by the name “Islamic State” and would recognize no existing national borders. By November 2014, the organization controlled some 100,000 square kilometers of territory in the Middle East.
In September 2012, Brennan was involved in crafting the false talking points that then-Secretary of State Susan Rice delivered during five separate television interviews regarding the 9/11/12 terrorist attack against a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya. Specifically, Rice claimed that according to the “best information at present,” the deadly attack was not premeditated, but rather, was a “spontaneous reaction” to “a hateful and offensive [anti-Islamic] video that was widely disseminated throughout the Arab and Muslim world.”
In March 2014, Senator Dianne Feinstein—the head of a Senate Intelligence Committee that was involved in a multi-year probe of the CIA’s use of harsh interrogation measures against suspected terrorists during the Bush Administration—went to the Senate floor and angrily accused the Agency of having hacked into the computers of her Committee staffers. In response, Brennan expressed dismay that “some members of the Senate” were making “spurious allegations about CIA actions that are wholly unsupported by the facts.” Moreover, he told NBC’s Andrea Mitchell: “As far as the allegations of the CIA hacking into Senate computers, nothing could be further from the truth. We wouldn’t do that. I mean, that’s just beyond the, you know, the scope of reason in terms of what we do.” Brennan likewise told the media that “a lot of people who are claiming that there has been this tremendous sort of spying and monitoring and hacking will be proved wrong.”
But according to the findings of a CIA inspector general’s report that was released on July 31, 2014, it was actually Brennan who was proved wrong. The report indicated that five CIA employees—two attorneys and three computer specialists—indeed had surreptitiously and unlawfully searched files and emails on the computers of the aforementioned Senate investigators. In response to the report, Brennan apologized to Senate Intelligence Committee leaders.
In a March 2015 speech at the Council on Foreign Relations, Brennan refused to refer to the Islamic State (ISIS) terror group as an “Islamic” entity. “By ascribing [sic] it as a Muslim terrorism or Islamic extremism,” he said, “I think it does really give them the type of Islamic legitimacy that they are so desperately seeking, but which they don’t deserve at all.”
In May 2017, Brennan lied to Congress when he testified that: (a) he did not know who had commissioned the infamous Steele dossier which contained many false accusations against Donald Trump and his political allies, and (b) the CIA had not relied on the dossier’s contents for any action that the Agency took.
In July 2018, Brennan was outraged by President Donald Trump’s remarks at a joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki. At that event, Trump expressed doubt about a U.S. Intelligence Community assessment claiming that Russian operatives had interfered in America’s 2016 presidential election, and he suggested that he had at least as much faith in the Russian KGB as he had in the American CIA. Later that day, Brennan described Trump’s comments as “nothing short of treasonous.”
In August 2018, President Trump revoked Brennan’s security clearance, explaining that Brennan’s “lying and recent conduct characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary” was “wholly inconsistent with access to the nation’s most closely held secrets and facilities, the very aim of our adversaries, which is to sow division and chaos.” In response, Brennan told NBC’s Meet the Press that Trump’s move was “treasonous.”
In a February 2020 interview on MSNBC, Brennan said that President Trump’s staunchest supporters are a “very debased group of people.”
In light of John Brennan’s long history of undermining America’s national security by downplaying the extent of the threat posed by our nation’s most committed enemies, it is no wonder that he detests President Trump. In virtually every way possible, Trump is the anti-Brennan.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-05-13--California:  Cops Attempt To Enforce Social Distancing & Get Run Off By Water Guns (Video)

Los Angeles , CA — A video that will surely be a controversial conversation starter was shared with the Free Thought Project this week showing LAPD officers getting doused with water in a Los Angeles neighborhood .
According to the OP , the officers were in the neighborhood to enforce social distancing .
It is clear in the video that none of the residents of the Los Angeles neighborhood who were outside were concerned with social distancing .
“ Six feet !
Six feet !
” a person is heard yelling when the cops exited the vehicle .
All of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rounded the front of his cruiser , a young man runs up with a water gun and starts spraying .
He was clearly not afraid of how the officer would react and seemed to be doing it as a joke .
The first person spraying would then set off a chain reaction of other people joining in and spraying the officers .
Eventually , they were hit with so much water that they had to retreat .
As the two officers got in their vehicle , a torrent of water was unleashed on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ water gun as the pair drove off .
Below is that video .
With a population of nearly 4 million residents , Los Angeles is the largest city in California and the country ’ s second most populous city after New York City .
It is clear from this video that a significant portion of the city is not practicing social distancing .
Despite this obvious lack of social distancing , California is not even ranked in the top 30 states per 100,000 people for coronavirus deaths .
Something to think about .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not the first time citizens have been caught on video dousing cops with water .
Last year , this became a trend .
Multiple videos of people dumping water on cops took the internet by storm in 2019 with some police supporters calling for the offenders to be killed .
Despite not doing anything at the time , in July , police began arresting the people seen in the videos for dumping water on the officers .
According to police , one of the men in a now-viral video seen dumping water on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ July , Perez was arrested in connection with the drenching of two police officers by a crowd with buckets of water in the Bronx .
The incident on East 173rd Street and Boston Road in the Bronx was captured on cellphone video , according to NBC New York .
Perez was charged with harassment , criminal mischief , disorderly conduct and criminal trespass .
After his arrest , police released images of 10 more people wanted in connection with the water incident .
The images led to the arrest of three more people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chad Bowden , all 28 , and all face charges similar to Perez .
The video of the officers getting drenched by a crowd of people sent shock waves through the media .
Because water can ’ t really hurt someone , the debate over what should happen to people who dump it on cops raged .
Then , as TFTP reported at the time , we saw how the police felt about it when they began making arrests .
Exactly how the LAPD will respond to the people spraying water in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if they respond to water guns like they respond to innocent people sitting in a field , the residents of this neighborhood should be on the lookout .

Los Angeles, CA — A video that will surely be a controversial conversation starter was shared with the Free Thought Project this week showing LAPD officers getting doused with water in a Los Angeles neighborhood.
According to the OP, the officers were in the neighborhood to enforce social distancing. It is clear in the video that none of the residents of the Los Angeles neighborhood who were outside were concerned with social distancing.
“Six feet! Six feet!” a person is heard yelling when the cops exited the vehicle.
All of the sudden, as the male officer rounded the front of his cruiser, a young man runs up with a water gun and starts spraying. He was clearly not afraid of how the officer would react and seemed to be doing it as a joke.
The first person spraying would then set off a chain reaction of other people joining in and spraying the officers. Eventually, they were hit with so much water that they had to retreat.
As the two officers got in their vehicle, a torrent of water was unleashed on their cruiser with one person throwing a water gun as the pair drove off.
Below is that video.
With a population of nearly 4 million residents, Los Angeles is the largest city in California and the country’s second most populous city after New York City. It is clear from this video that a significant portion of the city is not practicing social distancing. Despite this obvious lack of social distancing, California is not even ranked in the top 30 states per 100,000 people for coronavirus deaths. Something to think about.
As TFTP has reported, this is not the first time citizens have been caught on video dousing cops with water. Last year, this became a trend. Multiple videos of people dumping water on cops took the internet by storm in 2019 with some police supporters calling for the offenders to be killed. Despite not doing anything at the time, in July, police began arresting the people seen in the videos for dumping water on the officers.
According to police, one of the men in a now-viral video seen dumping water on officers was 24-year-old Robert Perez. In July, Perez was arrested in connection with the drenching of two police officers by a crowd with buckets of water in the Bronx. The incident on East 173rd Street and Boston Road in the Bronx was captured on cellphone video, according to NBC New York.
Perez was charged with harassment, criminal mischief, disorderly conduct and criminal trespass. After his arrest, police released images of 10 more people wanted in connection with the water incident. The images led to the arrest of three more people, Courtney Thompson, Isiah Scott and Chad Bowden, all 28, and all face charges similar to Perez.
The video of the officers getting drenched by a crowd of people sent shock waves through the media. Because water can’t really hurt someone, the debate over what should happen to people who dump it on cops raged. Then, as TFTP reported at the time, we saw how the police felt about it when they began making arrests.
Exactly how the LAPD will respond to the people spraying water in this video remains a mystery. However, if they respond to water guns like they respond to innocent people sitting in a field, the residents of this neighborhood should be on the lookout.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist