thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-28--Thousands of Fake Votes Found at Wisconsin Recount (Photos)

Wisconsin is currently engaged in a recount of 2020 election ballots and what they are finding seems to be more evidence of voter fraud .
According to our source on the ground : More than 2,000 of fake votes were found at Wisconsin Recount in Dane County on Friday * On Black Friday , there were so many Trump observers that two dozen of them had nowhere to sit , and had to back upstairs and watch on closed circuit TV .
The signature “ MLW ” was used on the the fake votes .
These initials were found on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indefinitely confined ” people .
Joe Biden reportedly won Wisconsin after a huge dump of votes were dropped in the middle of the night of Biden only votes to put him ahead of President Donald Trump .
Joe Biden currently leads the state by around 20,000 votes .
In this final photo , the fake votes are the two piles on the right .
Clearly , the numbers are still far apart , but that ’ s quite a significant difference from the first count .
With outstanding ballots remaining to be counted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those numbers , more than likely , change quite a bit .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Wisconsin is currently engaged in a recount of 2020 election ballots and what they are finding seems to be more evidence of voter fraud.
Gateway Pundit, reports:
According to our source on the ground: More than 2,000 of fake votes were found at Wisconsin Recount in Dane County on Friday
* On Black Friday, there were so many Trump observers that two dozen of them had nowhere to sit, and had to back upstairs and watch on closed circuit TV.
* Thousands of fake votes were found!
The signature “MLW” was used on the the fake votes.
These initials were found on thousands of “votes” by “indefinitely confined” people.
Joe Biden reportedly won Wisconsin after a huge dump of votes were dropped in the middle of the night of Biden only votes to put him ahead of President Donald Trump.
Joe Biden currently leads the state by around 20,000 votes.
In this final photo, the fake votes are the two piles on the right.
Clearly, the numbers are still far apart, but that’s quite a significant difference from the first count. With outstanding ballots remaining to be counted, one can assume we will see those numbers, more than likely, change quite a bit.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-28--US-Born Moms Kidnapped, Interrogated By Officers For Speaking Spanish – Lawsuit (Video)

Havre , MT — Ana Suda and Martha “ Mimi ” Hernandez are both U.S. born citizens who grew up in Texas and California respectively .
But their lifelong citizenship and complete lack of criminal record would have no bearing on a US Border patrol agent hell-bent on taking ‘ dangerous ’ Spanish speaking women off the streets of Havre , Montana .
Now , because no one was held accountable for their unlawful detainment , the taxpayers of Montana will be held responsible instead .
Hernandez and Suda settled for an undisclosed monetary settlement in the lawsuit they filed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to admit fault in the case .
In settling the case , U.S. Customs and Border Protection said it did not admit liability and added in a statement that “ the overwhelming majority of CBP employees and officers perform their duties with honor and distinction , working tirelessly every day to keep our country safe.
” As TFTP reported , the incident happened on May 18 , 2018 , as Suda and Hernandez stood in line at a local grocery store .
The two ladies were having a friendly conversation—in Spanish—an entirely legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most grocery stores everyday in this country .
However , the Border Patrol Agent in line behind them , saw their conversation as nefarious .
He just knew they were evil criminal scum .
As the two innocent US citizens checked out at the register , this “ hero ” public servant demanded to know where they were born .
Remember , they had done nothing wrong and were simply speaking Spanish .
Still , Suda and Hernandez complied and told the officer they were born in Texas and California .
But he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then demanded the two women hand over their driver ’ s licenses which were apparently not enough to get them immediately on their way .
The two innocent US citizens were then held against their will—otherwise known as kidnapping—by US Border Patrol Agents who completely humiliated them in front of their friends and neighbors .
“ After Mimi and I told the officer that we were born in the U.S. , ” Suda explained .
“ he demanded that we show identification .
I didn ’ t feel like I could say no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We gave him our Montana driver ’ s licenses and then followed him outside into the store ’ s parking lot as directed .
” During their illegal detainment , Suda and Hernandez were interrogated as if they were criminals .
The scene is something akin to the era of “ papers please ” as these entirely innocent women were temporarily kidnapped and forced to prove they weren ’ t “ illegal ” human beings who should be shipped off to some ‘ camp ’ .
Had they been “ illegal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speaking Spanish is most assuredly not probable cause for detainment .
Even if a person speaks no English at all , the state can not detain them for it .
Nevertheless , this tyrant agent had no problem telling the women why he had taken them into custody .
When Suda and Hernandez asked him why they were being humiliated and interrogated , the officer responded with brutal honesty .
Suda explained that “ Agent O ’ Neal — the name on his badge — got on his car radio and asked for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a carton of eggs were a threat .
As we stood there , I felt a knot in the pit of my stomach .
I told him that I was going to start filming on my cell phone .
Then I made a simple request , ‘ Can you tell us in video why you asked for our ID ’ s please.
’ ” “ He said it was because ‘ You guys are speaking Spanish which is very unheard of up here , ’ ” said Suda .
This is confirmed on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Suda and Hernandez were held captive as other armed agents showed up in their uniforms and carrying guns—to investigate two American soccer moms—a shameful act indeed .
Suda and Hernandez ’ case is now finally settled , hopefully leading to change inside the organization which illegally detains people for speaking Spanish .
“ We stood up to the government because speaking Spanish is not a reason to be racially profile and harassed , ” Suda said in a statement provided by the ACLU .
“ I am proud to be bilingual , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this case CBP takes a hard look at its policies and practices .
No one else should ever have to go through this again.
” Sadly , for speaking out about the incident , Suda and Hernandez say that they ’ ve been harassed repeatedly and have received hateful messages from people across the country .
Their children are even feeling the effects of this disgusting madness .
“ At his high school , a teacher asked Mimi ’ s son whether he had brought his ID to class .
My 8-year-old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has started responding to me in English when I ask her questions , ” said Suda .
Below is this most infuriating and saddening video .

Havre, MT — Ana Suda and Martha “Mimi” Hernandez are both U.S. born citizens who grew up in Texas and California respectively. But their lifelong citizenship and complete lack of criminal record would have no bearing on a US Border patrol agent hell-bent on taking ‘dangerous’ Spanish speaking women off the streets of Havre, Montana. Now, because no one was held accountable for their unlawful detainment, the taxpayers of Montana will be held responsible instead.
Hernandez and Suda settled for an undisclosed monetary settlement in the lawsuit they filed last year. The Border Patrol refused to admit fault in the case.
In settling the case, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said it did not admit liability and added in a statement that “the overwhelming majority of CBP employees and officers perform their duties with honor and distinction, working tirelessly every day to keep our country safe.”
As TFTP reported, the incident happened on May 18, 2018, as Suda and Hernandez stood in line at a local grocery store. The two ladies were having a friendly conversation—in Spanish—an entirely legal and common activity which takes place in most grocery stores everyday in this country. However, the Border Patrol Agent in line behind them, saw their conversation as nefarious. He just knew they were evil criminal scum.
As the two innocent US citizens checked out at the register, this “hero” public servant demanded to know where they were born. Remember, they had done nothing wrong and were simply speaking Spanish. Still, Suda and Hernandez complied and told the officer they were born in Texas and California. But he did not believe them.
The agent then demanded the two women hand over their driver’s licenses which were apparently not enough to get them immediately on their way. The two innocent US citizens were then held against their will—otherwise known as kidnapping—by US Border Patrol Agents who completely humiliated them in front of their friends and neighbors.
“After Mimi and I told the officer that we were born in the U.S.,” Suda explained. “he demanded that we show identification. I didn’t feel like I could say no since he was in uniform and armed. We gave him our Montana driver’s licenses and then followed him outside into the store’s parking lot as directed. ”
During their illegal detainment, Suda and Hernandez were interrogated as if they were criminals. The scene is something akin to the era of “papers please” as these entirely innocent women were temporarily kidnapped and forced to prove they weren’t “illegal” human beings who should be shipped off to some ‘camp’.
Had they been “illegal,” the stop was still unconstitutional as speaking Spanish is most assuredly not probable cause for detainment. Even if a person speaks no English at all, the state cannot detain them for it.
Nevertheless, this tyrant agent had no problem telling the women why he had taken them into custody. When Suda and Hernandez asked him why they were being humiliated and interrogated, the officer responded with brutal honesty.
Suda explained that “Agent O’Neal — the name on his badge — got on his car radio and asked for backup, as if two moms holding a carton of eggs were a threat. As we stood there, I felt a knot in the pit of my stomach. I told him that I was going to start filming on my cell phone. Then I made a simple request, ‘Can you tell us in video why you asked for our ID’s please.’”
“He said it was because ‘You guys are speaking Spanish which is very unheard of up here,’” said Suda. This is confirmed on the video.
For nearly an hour, Suda and Hernandez were held captive as other armed agents showed up in their uniforms and carrying guns—to investigate two American soccer moms—a shameful act indeed.
Suda and Hernandez’ case is now finally settled, hopefully leading to change inside the organization which illegally detains people for speaking Spanish.
“We stood up to the government because speaking Spanish is not a reason to be racially profile and harassed,” Suda said in a statement provided by the ACLU. “I am proud to be bilingual, and I hope that as a result of this case CBP takes a hard look at its policies and practices. No one else should ever have to go through this again.”
Sadly, for speaking out about the incident, Suda and Hernandez say that they’ve been harassed repeatedly and have received hateful messages from people across the country.
Their children are even feeling the effects of this disgusting madness.
“At his high school, a teacher asked Mimi’s son whether he had brought his ID to class. My 8-year-old daughter is scared to speak Spanish and has started responding to me in English when I ask her questions,” said Suda.
Below is this most infuriating and saddening video.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-28--Can States Legalize Stealing Federal Elections?

A question raised by today ’ s decision out of Pennsylvania .
The decision largely rests on the judge ’ s contention that Pennsylvania ’ s election law fails to ban all sorts of abuses , including excluding poll watchers and illegal ballots , and federal courts have nothing to say about this .
Now , obviously , the decision would look very different if the shoe were on the other foot , in no small part because the Democrats can always claim disproportionate impact on minority voters .
Some of the cases this time around by Republicans have emphasized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particular gambit is copyrighted by the plantation party .
Obviously , this was a step in larger strategy , but the problem is very real .
Consider Bush v. Gore .
Having to invoke equal protection in federal court cases involving federal elections is absurd .
It ’ s also a very weak reed for protecting the integrity of a political system from abuses both blatant and subtle .
The Pennsylvania argument is that the state can perpetrate its choice of abuses that federal courts shouldn ’ t be able to remedy ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the need to continue monitoring the voting setups of southern states ) , the complainants have to prove standing , damages , and a remedy that is equivalent to the damages .
In other words , you can ’ t challenge the actual election unless you have enough plaintiffs to change the results .
That ’ s not something that a campaign can realistically come up with a few weeks after the election when the difference is high enough .
If states illegally making up election law on the fly is treated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can ’ t move forward within the state because , as in Pennsylvania , its judiciary is hopelessly partisan and corrupt , and federal judges refuse to touch it because it ’ s a state issue , then our political system is little better than a banana republic .
This is essentially an argument that Tammany Hall can steal ballots in plain view , and that Tammany Hall ’ s own local courts can laugh , and that federal courts can ’ t touch the problem .
That might be a credible argument @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hall era who were proponents of local governance , but the Democrats want everything controlled by the federal government , except on those occasions when it ’ s inconvenient for them , such as illegal migration .
This is obviously an unsustainable situation that allows local corruption to steal national elections .
It ’ s not the first this has happened .
But this time everyone is watching .

A question raised by today’s decision out of Pennsylvania. The decision largely rests on the judge’s contention that Pennsylvania’s election law fails to ban all sorts of abuses, including excluding poll watchers and illegal ballots, and federal courts have nothing to say about this. Now, obviously, the decision would look very different if the shoe were on the other foot, in no small part because the Democrats can always claim disproportionate impact on minority voters. Some of the cases this time around by Republicans have emphasized minority plaintiffs, but realistically speaking this particular gambit is copyrighted by the plantation party.
Obviously, this was a step in larger strategy, but the problem is very real. Consider Bush v. Gore. Having to invoke equal protection in federal court cases involving federal elections is absurd. It’s also a very weak reed for protecting the integrity of a political system from abuses both blatant and subtle.
The Pennsylvania argument is that the state can perpetrate its choice of abuses that federal courts shouldn’t be able to remedy (and this is while the Democrats insist on the need to continue monitoring the voting setups of southern states), the complainants have to prove standing, damages, and a remedy that is equivalent to the damages. In other words, you can’t challenge the actual election unless you have enough plaintiffs to change the results. That’s not something that a campaign can realistically come up with a few weeks after the election when the difference is high enough.
If states illegally making up election law on the fly is treated as a state issue, and it can’t move forward within the state because, as in Pennsylvania, its judiciary is hopelessly partisan and corrupt, and federal judges refuse to touch it because it’s a state issue, then our political system is little better than a banana republic.
This is essentially an argument that Tammany Hall can steal ballots in plain view, and that Tammany Hall’s own local courts can laugh, and that federal courts can’t touch the problem. That might be a credible argument coming from the Democrats of the Tammany Hall era who were proponents of local governance, but the Democrats want everything controlled by the federal government, except on those occasions when it’s inconvenient for them, such as illegal migration.
This is obviously an unsustainable situation that allows local corruption to steal national elections. It’s not the first this has happened. But this time everyone is watching.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-28--Effort Justification & Mask Mandates: The Science Behind Virtue Signaling

America continues to march in lock step with the COVID-19 agenda as they have yet to throw off their masks and demand an end to the insidiousness of mask mandates and forced lockdowns .
While there is a growing segment of the population who refuse to comply , most people , no doubt influenced by the constant fear messaging coming from the media , continue to go along .
A recent study in Denmark proved that the forced wearing of masks made no statistical difference ̶ ̶ within the margin of error ̶̶ ̶ of whether people will become infected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out the evidence that wearing a mask does nothing to protect the wearer .
Well , therein lies the point .
This has never been the claim .
The mask mandates are based on the existing evidence which suggests that a person infected with a flu like illness is less likely to spread infection in certain settings , when wearing a mask .
In the beginning , the logic for mask mandates was built around a huge media blitz of propaganda suggesting that we all could be asymptomatic carriers .
This is despite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is no longer any need for asymptomatic people to get tested at all .
This is because asymptomatic people rarely spread infection .
Many Americans are blissfully unaware of this fact because the CDC , in all their honesty , only made the update on their website with no official announcement .
The wearing of masks has become a virtue signal of sorts ; a sign of a moral superiority of the wearer that shows they care about you and are willing to sacrifice their own freedom , for your safety .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vision you want others to have of yourself ( McClay , 2018 ) .
It is more about wanting to appear as a good person , or a doer of good deeds , ( McClay , 2018 ) opposed to doing them .
Virtue signaling , in this sense , is not a good thing if the signal overrides any sense of a real value ( McClay , 2018 ) .
What you end up with , in many cases , is accusatory attitudes on both sides of the issue .
On one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the signaler suggesting there is a moral superiority and , failing to fall in line demonstrates a lack of compassion .
On the other side , is the accusation that someone is merely hiding behind an issue to make themselves look and or , feel good ( McClay , 2018 ) .
There is a science of behavior behind the concept of virtue signaling that this writer feels may be being taken advantage of by those pushing the COVID-19 narrative .
In the book , B.F. Skinner states that “ those who work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the products ” ( Skinner , 1973 , p. 91 ) .
What does this mean ?
It suggests that the personal effort is the reinforcing value put into the action , which is the product .
In the case of mask mandates , the mask indicates a higher virtue of caring for society , and the effort that goes along with maintaining this higher virtue is the controlling element .
In other words , the people behind the Covid-19 propaganda fully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the lie of asymptomatic carriers would induce compliance among most people because most people do have a genuine care for others around them .
But wait !
There is more .
There is a theory called cognitive dissonance , put out by Leon Festinger in 1957 , which seeks to answer how people deal with the psychological discomfort of behaviors that contradict beliefs .
The feeling of discomfort is referred to as dissonance .
The theory is based on the idea that in most cases , people need to feel that their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are not , he theorized , they justify whatever actions they take to reduce that feeling of inconsistency .
One such theory of dissonance reduction is called effort justification .
This is exactly as it sounds .
According to an article called Reducing Cognitive Dissonance Through Effort Justification : Evidence from Past Studies and Daily Experience , effort justification suggests that the amount of work put into the achievement of a goal may be enough to encourage a change in attitude or behavior towards that particular objective .
This theory suggests that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insisting on everyone wearing a mask are motivated by their own feelings of inconsistency .
They too , were just as shocked that anyone would mandate such a thing but because they complied , they justified their compliance through the hard work of maintaining the idea that it is for the greater good .
Now , as Skinner says , it is the controlling element of their behavior .
Evidence for effort justification to reduce dissonance was found in a study conducted by Leon Festinger and James Carlsmith in 1959 ( Maich , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the use of high or low dollar rewards for contributing to a college assignment .
The findings showed that effort justification and opinion change occurred most in the group that took lower payments because they had to psychologically make up for the inconsistency between supporting the stated position in the assignment opposed to their own .
Whereas the higher paid group justified it because they were paid well ( Maich , 2013 ) .
It stands to reason , however , that people will put a higher value into the work put into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not .
What is disconcerting about the whole thing is the fact that it is an understood aspect of human behavior that could easily be manipulated for nefarious purposes .
Read the rest at Defense Of Our Nation

America continues to march in lock step with the COVID-19 agenda as they have yet to throw off their masks and demand an end to the insidiousness of mask mandates and forced lockdowns. While there is a growing segment of the population who refuse to comply, most people, no doubt influenced by the constant fear messaging coming from the media, continue to go along.
A recent study in Denmark proved that the forced wearing of masks made no statistical difference ̶ ̶ within the margin of error ̶̶ ̶ of whether people will become infected or not. The study explicitly lays out the evidence that wearing a mask does nothing to protect the wearer. Well, therein lies the point. This has never been the claim.
The mask mandates are based on the existing evidence which suggests that a person infected with a flu like illness is less likely to spread infection in certain settings, when wearing a mask. In the beginning, the logic for mask mandates was built around a huge media blitz of propaganda suggesting that we all could be asymptomatic carriers. This is despite the CDC admitting in late August that there is no longer any need for asymptomatic people to get tested at all. This is because asymptomatic people rarely spread infection. Many Americans are blissfully unaware of this fact because the CDC, in all their honesty, only made the update on their website with no official announcement.
The wearing of masks has become a virtue signal of sorts; a sign of a moral superiority of the wearer that shows they care about you and are willing to sacrifice their own freedom, for your safety. It is a way of solidifying a vision you want others to have of yourself (McClay, 2018). It is more about wanting to appear as a good person, or a doer of good deeds, (McClay, 2018) opposed to doing them. Virtue signaling, in this sense, is not a good thing if the signal overrides any sense of a real value (McClay, 2018).
What you end up with, in many cases, is accusatory attitudes on both sides of the issue. On one side is the attitude being displayed by the signaler suggesting there is a moral superiority and, failing to fall in line demonstrates a lack of compassion. On the other side, is the accusation that someone is merely hiding behind an issue to make themselves look and or, feel good (McClay, 2018).
There is a science of behavior behind the concept of virtue signaling that this writer feels may be being taken advantage of by those pushing the COVID-19 narrative. In the book Beyond Freedom and Dignity , B.F. Skinner states that “those who work productively because of the reinforcing value of what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the products” (Skinner, 1973, p. 91). What does this mean? It suggests that the personal effort is the reinforcing value put into the action, which is the product. In the case of mask mandates, the mask indicates a higher virtue of caring for society, and the effort that goes along with maintaining this higher virtue is the controlling element. In other words, the people behind the Covid-19 propaganda fully expected, based on this idea, that the lie of asymptomatic carriers would induce compliance among most people because most people do have a genuine care for others around them. But wait! There is more.
There is a theory called cognitive dissonance, put out by Leon Festinger in 1957, which seeks to answer how people deal with the psychological discomfort of behaviors that contradict beliefs. The feeling of discomfort is referred to as dissonance. The theory is based on the idea that in most cases, people need to feel that their beliefs and behaviors are consistent. When they are not, he theorized, they justify whatever actions they take to reduce that feeling of inconsistency. One such theory of dissonance reduction is called effort justification. This is exactly as it sounds.
According to an article called Reducing Cognitive Dissonance Through Effort Justification: Evidence from Past Studies and Daily Experience, effort justification suggests that the amount of work put into the achievement of a goal may be enough to encourage a change in attitude or behavior towards that particular objective. This theory suggests that it is at least possible that those insisting on everyone wearing a mask are motivated by their own feelings of inconsistency. They too, were just as shocked that anyone would mandate such a thing but because they complied, they justified their compliance through the hard work of maintaining the idea that it is for the greater good. Now, as Skinner says, it is the controlling element of their behavior.
Evidence for effort justification to reduce dissonance was found in a study conducted by Leon Festinger and James Carlsmith in 1959 (Maich, 2013). This study revolved around the use of high or low dollar rewards for contributing to a college assignment. The findings showed that effort justification and opinion change occurred most in the group that took lower payments because they had to psychologically make up for the inconsistency between supporting the stated position in the assignment opposed to their own. Whereas the higher paid group justified it because they were paid well (Maich, 2013). It stands to reason, however, that people will put a higher value into the work put into anything, whether they believe it or not. What is disconcerting about the whole thing is the fact that it is an understood aspect of human behavior that could easily be manipulated for nefarious purposes.
Read the rest at Defense Of Our Nation


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-28--Christians: The Forefathers Appeal Was To Jesus/Heaven – Not To Their Favorite Politicians!

Christians : The Forefathers Appeal Was To Jesus/Heaven – Not To Their Favorite Politicians !
How Americans have forgotten their Christian heritage amazes me to no end ( Hosea 4:6 ) .
What happens to a people when they forsake God ’ s moral law ( Exodus 20 ) ?
Well , the Bible tells us that they praise the wicked ( Proverbs 28:4 ) , and the wicked they praise .
Today , instead of making an appeal to Heaven , the professed Christians ( 1 John 2:4 ) , and professors they are ( Matthew 23 ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the place of Christ .
In turn , they then reap the curse that they sowed ( Jeremiah 17:5 ; Galatians 6:7 ) .
How contrary to that of our founding forefathers .
56 founders , along with 13 colonies , stood against the greatest military in the world and threw off a tyrant that would not be ruled by God .
Their appeal was to Heaven where Jesus now resides ( Acts 7:55 ) 25 of the 56 signers had seminary degrees and the least religious founder , Thomas Paine , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were attempting to take praise unto themselves that belonged to the Lord ( Romans 1:22 ) .
We have Christian crosses over the heads of our fallen , God in every state preamble , God on our money , Moses and the Ten Commandments , which drives us to Christ ( Galatians 3:24 ) , etched into capital buildings across the country , politicians swearing-in with their hand on the Bible .
Colleges such as Yale , Harvard , Princeton , etc .
started out as Christian colleges to raise up congregants to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
Friends , we are rich in Christian heritage and most do not even know it .
This is a Christian nation ( Psalm 33:12 ) .
In contrast , what is it that we see today ?
Those who call themselves preachers are driving men to their favorite politicians in the place of Christ ( John 14:6 ) in replacing God ’ s government ( The Mosiac institution , Common Law ) for that of man ’ s .
They then sit back and wonder what is the problem .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Hirelings is more like it ; John 10:12 ) are bringing men to the curse rather than to the blessing ( Isaiah 30:1-3 ) .
These hirelings are pointing their finger towards man ’ s favorite politicians rather than to the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world ( John 1:29 ) .
It used to be that every Sabbath Day in this country that the law and the prophets were preached .
Now , it ’ s their favorite politicians that are proclaimed , which have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even killing ( John 10:10 ) .
Yet , they then wonder why their country is turning into the hell that it is ( Psalm 9:17 ) .
In conclusion : If Christians were Christ-like they would know to do their own due diligence and read the Bible for themselves to know the difference ( 2 Chronicles 19:2 ; John 7:17 ) .
It is time to go back to the old paths ( Jeremiah 6:16 ) and get educated so that we can preserve what it is that our Savior ( John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , bled and died to give to us ( John 15:13 ) .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media .
Article by Bradlee Dean

Christians: The Forefathers Appeal Was To Jesus/Heaven – Not To Their Favorite Politicians!
“No King But King Jesus” & “Appeal to Heaven” -Flags raised up during the War For Independence
How Americans have forgotten their Christian heritage amazes me to no end (Hosea 4:6).
What happens to a people when they forsake God’s moral law (Exodus 20)? Well, the Bible tells us that they praise the wicked (Proverbs 28:4), and the wicked they praise.
Today, instead of making an appeal to Heaven, the professed Christians (1 John 2:4), and professors they are (Matthew 23), make their appeal to their favorite politicians in the place of Christ. In turn, they then reap the curse that they sowed (Jeremiah 17:5; Galatians 6:7). How contrary to that of our founding forefathers.
56 founders, along with 13 colonies, stood against the greatest military in the world and threw off a tyrant that would not be ruled by God. Their appeal was to Heaven where Jesus now resides (Acts 7:55)
25 of the 56 signers had seminary degrees and the least religious founder, Thomas Paine, was found in France rebuking scientists who were attempting to take praise unto themselves that belonged to the Lord (Romans 1:22).
We have Christian crosses over the heads of our fallen, God in every state preamble, God on our money, Moses and the Ten Commandments, which drives us to Christ (Galatians 3:24), etched into capital buildings across the country, politicians swearing-in with their hand on the Bible.
Colleges such as Yale, Harvard, Princeton, etc. started out as Christian colleges to raise up congregants to preach to the world (Luke 19:10).
Friends, we are rich in Christian heritage and most do not even know it. This is a Christian nation (Psalm 33:12).
In contrast, what is it that we see today? Those who call themselves preachers are driving men to their favorite politicians in the place of Christ (John 14:6) in replacing God’s government (The Mosiac institution, Common Law) for that of man’s. They then sit back and wonder what is the problem. In truth, these said preachers of today (Hirelings is more like it; John 10:12) are bringing men to the curse rather than to the blessing (Isaiah 30:1-3).
These hirelings are pointing their finger towards man’s favorite politicians rather than to the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world (John 1:29).
It used to be that every Sabbath Day in this country that the law and the prophets were preached. Now, it’s their favorite politicians that are proclaimed, which have a long record of lying, stealing and even killing (John 10:10). Yet, they then wonder why their country is turning into the hell that it is (Psalm 9:17).
Today, men honor what God calls an abomination (I Kings 13:33; Luke 6:26, 16:15)
In conclusion: If Christians were Christ-like they would know to do their own due diligence and read the Bible for themselves to know the difference (2 Chronicles 19:2; John 7:17).
It is time to go back to the old paths (Jeremiah 6:16) and get educated so that we can preserve what it is that our Savior (John 3:16) and our forefathers have fought, bled and died to give to us (John 15:13).
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media. Article by Bradlee Dean


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-28--New Documentary Reveals: BBC Reporter Told Princess Diana Royals Were Planning To Kill Her

New Documentary Reveals : BBC Reporter Told Princess Diana Royals Were Planning To Kill Her I remember the royal wedding as a young man .
Later , I would recount the news of her untimely death .
Now , a new documentary that is set to air in the United Kingdom reveals that a BBC reporter informed Princess Diana that the security forces of the British Crown were planning her death .
Former BBC reporter Martin Bashir told Princess Diana that security forces with the British Crown were planning to kill her , prior to the now-infamous interview that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new documentary set to air on channel 4 in the UK .
The documentary is titled The Diana Interview : The Truth Behind the Scandal .
Bashir reportedly shared the information with her in order to gain her confidence and secure a coveted interview with the princess .
He even reportedly showed her proof that there was a plot against her , which included bank statements .
Royal investigators and the BBC insist that these documents were fakes .
Royal biographer Andrew Morton says that Bashir warned her that “ They ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Diana was left ‘ terrified ’ after being ‘ fed stories ’ by Bashir .
There have also been accusations that executives at the BBC were aware of Bashir ’ s practices .
Footage has surfaced which shows BBC executives , including former director-general Tony Hall , the corporation ’ s head of news in 1995 , praising Bashir in reference to the interview , saying that he “ works very hard at getting into your confidence.
” Now , new management at the BBC is promising a proper investigation , and they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hall let Bashir off the hook when he was accused of faking bank statements .
Morton says the BBC reporter played on Diana ’ s fears that members of the royal family were out to get her .
“ They were implicated in this kind of dark conspiracy , to the point where Diana thought that her head was on the chopping block , ” Mr Morton says .
A BBC spokesman said the company was “ determined to get to the truth of what happened.
” ‘ That ’ s why we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rolls ] Lord Dyson to lead a fully independent investigation .
It is vital that everyone with information shares that with Lord Dyson , so that he can investigate thoroughly and draw his conclusions having heard all the evidence , ” the spokesman said .
Alan Waller , the former head of security for Diana ’ s brother , claims that he was exploited by the journalist .
Waller told the Telegraph , “ This man has become a multi-millionaire by using me .
I am the fall guy .
Bashir has effectively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information , and then used it to frame me as the fall guy .
That is exactly what he has done .
He has framed me thinking I would never find out .
It has had a devastating effect on me.
” Waller said that the accusations against him nearly drove him to take his own life .
He said he has also lost “ substantial business deals ” because of the alleged bank statements .
Waller said that no one from the BBC approached him for his version of events for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even wrote a letter requesting an apology which he claims was ignored .
Waller is reportedly considering making a formal complaint to police and suing Bashir personally .
The death of Princess Diana is still unexplained , and there are many people who still believe that some type of foul play was involved .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

I remember the royal wedding as a young man. Later, I would recount the news of her untimely death. Now, a new documentary that is set to air in the United Kingdom reveals that a BBC reporter informed Princess Diana that the security forces of the British Crown were planning her death.
Mark Horowitz has the story.
Former BBC reporter Martin Bashir told Princess Diana that security forces with the British Crown were planning to kill her, prior to the now-infamous interview that the two did together, according to a new documentary set to air on channel 4 in the UK.
The documentary is titled The Diana Interview: The Truth Behind the Scandal.
Bashir reportedly shared the information with her in order to gain her confidence and secure a coveted interview with the princess.
He even reportedly showed her proof that there was a plot against her, which included bank statements. Royal investigators and the BBC insist that these documents were fakes.
Royal biographer Andrew Morton says that Bashir warned her that “They’re going to wipe you.”
EXCLUSIVE: MPs consider separate inquiry into Martin Bashir Princess Diana BBC interview https://t.co/SGXbf3PN6O — Mirror Royal (@MirrorRoyal) November 19, 2020
Morton says Diana was left ‘terrified’ after being ‘fed stories’ by Bashir.
There have also been accusations that executives at the BBC were aware of Bashir’s practices. Footage has surfaced which shows BBC executives, including former director-general Tony Hall, the corporation’s head of news in 1995, praising Bashir in reference to the interview, saying that he “works very hard at getting into your confidence.”
Now, new management at the BBC is promising a proper investigation, and they have found in old documents that Lord Hall let Bashir off the hook when he was accused of faking bank statements.
Prince William lent his support to the inquiry into Martin Bashir’s infamous Panorama interview with Princess Diana. https://t.co/sZavfBoYSH — VANITY FAIR (@VanityFair) November 23, 2020
Morton says the BBC reporter played on Diana’s fears that members of the royal family were out to get her.
“They were implicated in this kind of dark conspiracy, to the point where Diana thought that her head was on the chopping block,” Mr Morton says.
A BBC spokesman said the company was “determined to get to the truth of what happened.”
‘That’s why we have appointed [former Master of the Rolls] Lord Dyson to lead a fully independent investigation. It is vital that everyone with information shares that with Lord Dyson, so that he can investigate thoroughly and draw his conclusions having heard all the evidence,” the spokesman said.
Alan Waller, the former head of security for Diana’s brother, claims that he was exploited by the journalist.
Waller told the Telegraph, “This man has become a multi-millionaire by using me. I am the fall guy. Bashir has effectively stolen my identity, stolen my banking information, and then used it to frame me as the fall guy. That is exactly what he has done. He has framed me thinking I would never find out. It has had a devastating effect on me.”
20 November 1995. Princess Diana in an interview with Martin Bashir broadcast on the BBC1 programme Panorama gave intimate details of her marriage to Prince Charles, including an admission they had both had extra marital affairs. pic.twitter.com/Moq6spVLz8 — Prof Frank McDonough (@FXMC1957) November 20, 2020
Waller said that the accusations against him nearly drove him to take his own life.
He said he has also lost “substantial business deals” because of the alleged bank statements.
Waller said that no one from the BBC approached him for his version of events for the original story. He said that he even wrote a letter requesting an apology which he claims was ignored.
Waller is reportedly considering making a formal complaint to police and suing Bashir personally.
The death of Princess Diana is still unexplained, and there are many people who still believe that some type of foul play was involved.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-29--The Covid-19 “Crisis” – Introduction (Video)

As a theologian , I oftentimes get asked “ Why would God allow something like the Corona Virus ” or “ What do you think God is doing by allowing this worldwide pandemic ?
( sic ) .
Unfortunately , those Christian leaders who are supposed to have an “ ear to hear ” and enough biblical knowledge to inform the people what is happening and how Christians are to respond , simply reply to these questions with the same theological rhetoric that they give for every question .
Christianity in America is quite frankly broken .
This should not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first time , most of His contentious arguments were with the spiritual and political leaders of the day over the proper interpretation and application of scripture .
At one point , Christ even told the Sadducees “ You err not knowing the scripture ” ( Matthew 22:29 ) .
Sadly , today , many pastor ’ s Bibles are only about 30 verses deep .
Their whole theology can be summed up with the following three bullet points : “ 1 .
Love God .
2 .
Love your Neighbor .
3 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ these three things , we will be good witnesses for Christ.
” Unfortunately , this spiritually lazy answer is given for nearly every question with which we are faced .
During the coronavirus shutdown of Churches in the spring , I taught a series of lessons dealing with all of the issues that we were facing .
Whenever a question arose about how a believer is to deal with a particular issue , I searched the Scriptures ( Acts 17:11 ) in order to faithfully speak as the oracles of God ( 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over 31,000 verses and we can not cherry-pick our favorite Scriptures and shoehorn them into every situation .
We have to start with the understanding that “ All scripture is given by inspiration of God , and is profitable for doctrine , for reproof , for correction , for instruction in righteousness ” ( 2 Tim .
3:16-17 ) and not just our favorite 30 verses .
To understand what we must do , we must first find the proper context and then be able to draw from the “ whole council of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20:27 ) in order to gain a divine perspective of the situation and to determine a proper biblical course of action .
The Bible is profitable for teaching us how to respond to fear ; how to respond to a pandemic ; and even what Christ would say and do about government-mandated lockdowns and face masks .
None of this is what you hearing from most of the pulpits of America .
As a result , we have become a nation of the blind ( both politically and spiritually ) leading the blind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advice would be the same as it was in His day… “ Let them alone .
They are blind leaders of the blind .
And if the blind leads the blind , both will fall into a ditch ” ( Matthew 15:14 ) .
As Christians , we can rest in the sovereignty of God .
For what the enemies of mankind have intended for evil , God intends for good .
( Genesis 50:20 ) Peacemakers Outreach is creating a 12-part teaching series that will be available for FREE to all on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ w/ Dr. John Diamond .
Please watch the introduction video and then subscribe to our channel and turn on notifications to be alerted as we roll out this teaching series .
Also , signup for email alerts at Divine Worldview.com for more information about our complete upcoming course list .
1 .
Facemasks .
What Would Jesus Do ?
3 .
The Eyes of Faith : Seeing the Invisible 6 .
Kiss the Son : Lest He Be Angry Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

“For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and come to light.” -Luke 8:17
As a theologian, I oftentimes get asked “Why would God allow something like the Corona Virus” or “What do you think God is doing by allowing this worldwide pandemic? (sic). Unfortunately, those Christian leaders who are supposed to have an “ear to hear” and enough biblical knowledge to inform the people what is happening and how Christians are to respond, simply reply to these questions with the same theological rhetoric that they give for every question.
Christianity in America is quite frankly broken. This should not surprise us. When Christ came the first time, most of His contentious arguments were with the spiritual and political leaders of the day over the proper interpretation and application of scripture. At one point, Christ even told the Sadducees “You err not knowing the scripture” (Matthew 22:29). Sadly, today, many pastor’s Bibles are only about 30 verses deep. Their whole theology can be summed up with the following three bullet points: “1. Love God. 2. Love your Neighbor. 3. Obey your government. If we do these three things, we will be good witnesses for Christ.” Unfortunately, this spiritually lazy answer is given for nearly every question with which we are faced.
During the coronavirus shutdown of Churches in the spring, I taught a series of lessons dealing with all of the issues that we were facing. Whenever a question arose about how a believer is to deal with a particular issue, I searched the Scriptures (Acts 17:11) in order to faithfully speak as the oracles of God (1 Peter 4:11). The Bible contains over 31,000 verses and we cannot cherry-pick our favorite Scriptures and shoehorn them into every situation. We have to start with the understanding that “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Tim. 3:16-17) and not just our favorite 30 verses. To understand what we must do, we must first find the proper context and then be able to draw from the “whole council of God’s word” (Acts 20:27) in order to gain a divine perspective of the situation and to determine a proper biblical course of action.
The Bible is profitable for teaching us how to respond to fear; how to respond to a pandemic; and even what Christ would say and do about government-mandated lockdowns and face masks. None of this is what you hearing from most of the pulpits of America. As a result, we have become a nation of the blind (both politically and spiritually) leading the blind. If Christ were here, His advice would be the same as it was in His day… “Let them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind leads the blind, both will fall into a ditch” (Matthew 15:14). As Christians, we can rest in the sovereignty of God. For what the enemies of mankind have intended for evil, God intends for good. (Genesis 50:20)
Peacemakers Outreach is creating a 12-part teaching series that will be available for FREE to all on our YouTube Channel subscribers at Divine Worldview w/ Dr. John Diamond. Please watch the introduction video and then subscribe to our channel and turn on notifications to be alerted as we roll out this teaching series. Also, signup for email alerts at Divine Worldview.com for more information about our complete upcoming course list.
The Covid-19 Crisis Syllabus:
Introduction
1. Facemasks. What Would Jesus Do?
2. Conspiracy Theories
3. The Eyes of Faith: Seeing the Invisible
4. Two Genealogical Lines: God’s and Satan’s
5. The Guardian Angels: A Legion of Watchers
6. Kiss the Son: Lest He Be Angry
7. Covid – 19: A Pandemic of Fear – Part I
8. Covid – 19: A Pandemic of Fear – Part II
9. An Appeal to Heaven – Part 1
10. An Appeal to Heaven -Part 2
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-29--“This Is No Free Country” — Anti-Lockdown Protests Rage In London, Dozens Arrested

Even as the unlawful lockdowns rage on , the people of the UK continue to protest every Saturday .
This weekend dozens were arrested as the police have shown who they really work for there… the state .
Over 60 protesters were arrested in anti-lockdown demonstrations on Saturday , as activists clashed with police who sought to break it up .
If only it was a BLM demonstration .
According to The Guardian , “ officers were attempting to disperse the protesters after the Metropolitan police argued the demonstration was unlawful under coronavirus bans on gatherings after the removal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , however , believe the protests should be permitted under the “ reasonable excuse ” law , and called the de-facto ban as “ alarming.
” Officers faced jeers from demonstrators and chants of “ shame on you ” and “ choose your side ” as they sought to end the protest and enter crowds to make arrests , some forcibly .
They were also pelted with missiles on at least one occasion , video footage showed .
The Metropolitan police tweeted : “ Officers have made over 60 arrests following groups gathering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a number of different offences , including breaching coronavirus restrictions .
We expect this number to rise .
We continue to urge people to go home.
” –The Guardian “ Please ensure you have access to social media throughout the day , as the rally will need to be reactive to circumstances , ” wrote anti-lockdown group StandUpX in a Telegram post .
“ Bring pots , pans , whistles , party horns and anything you can to be heard , ” the post continue “ I got pushed about by police for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re squashing up anybody that wants to complain .
This is no free country , ” one protester told Sky News , while another held a sign saying “ Your fear leads to losing our liberty.
” The protest comes weeks after 190 people were arrested on Nov. 5 during another lockdown demonstration .
According to police spokesman Stuart Bell , “ This type of behaviour not only breaks the law , it also risks spreading the virus between multiple areas of the country .
It is for this reason that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and this is also why we will be taking appropriate enforcement action if this happens.
” We assume he ’ s OK with BLM protests .
“ In practice , police are increasingly treating protests as banned , ” said Big Brother Watch director Silkie Carlo , who has campaigned for civil liberties during the lockdown .
“ The incompetence and casual authoritarianism demonstrated by the Met police here is breathtaking .
The right to protest is the bedrock of any democracy .
It ’ s clear to me that there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and misrepresent the law , ” she added .
“ As the government takes unprecedented steps to interfere with our rights , sidelines parliament and attacks the rule of law , undermining protest is another threat to our ability to hold it to account and stand up to power .
Protest and dissent are the lifeblood of a healthy democracy , and even more so important in a public emergency , ” said Gracie Bradley , interim director of rights group “ Liberty.
” That ’ s not all , video also captured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protest .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Even as the unlawful lockdowns rage on, the people of the UK continue to protest every Saturday. This weekend dozens were arrested as the police have shown who they really work for there… the state.
Tyler Durden has the story.
Over 60 protesters were arrested in anti-lockdown demonstrations on Saturday, as activists clashed with police who sought to break it up.
If only it was a BLM demonstration.
Nobody can answer the question sufficiently. Why is there a 2 tier policing system in the UK that treats lockdown protesters like criminals while literally kneeling and bowing for Black Lives Matter? https://t.co/yTkabMfVEa — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 28, 2020
Nobody can answer the question sufficiently. Why is there a 2 tier policing system in the UK that treats lockdown protesters like criminals while literally kneeling and bowing for Black Lives Matter? https://t.co/yTkabMfVEa — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 28, 2020
According to The Guardian, “officers were attempting to disperse the protesters after the Metropolitan police argued the demonstration was unlawful under coronavirus bans on gatherings after the removal of the specific protest exemption.”
Rights groups, however, believe the protests should be permitted under the “reasonable excuse” law, and called the de-facto ban as “alarming.”
First arrest at antilockdown protest taking place at King’s Cross Station, London. Police cited covid restrictions before the arrest. #kingscross #antilockdown pic.twitter.com/AuqMKk2h0P — Urban Pictures (@Urban_Pictures) November 28, 2020
First arrest at antilockdown protest taking place at King's Cross Station, London. Police cited covid restrictions before the arrest. #kingscross #antilockdown pic.twitter.com/AuqMKk2h0P — Urban Pictures (@Urban_Pictures) November 28, 2020
Officers faced jeers from demonstrators and chants of “shame on you” and “choose your side” as they sought to end the protest and enter crowds to make arrests, some forcibly. They were also pelted with missiles on at least one occasion, video footage showed. The Metropolitan police tweeted: “Officers have made over 60 arrests following groups gathering in London today. These were for a number of different offences, including breaching coronavirus restrictions. We expect this number to rise. We continue to urge people to go home.” –The Guardian
“Please ensure you have access to social media throughout the day, as the rally will need to be reactive to circumstances,” wrote anti-lockdown group StandUpX in a Telegram post. “Bring pots, pans, whistles, party horns and anything you can to be heard,” the post continue
“I got pushed about by police for no reason earlier, just cause they’re squashing up anybody that wants to complain. This is no free country,” one protester told Sky News, while another held a sign saying “Your fear leads to losing our liberty.”
The protest comes weeks after 190 people were arrested on Nov. 5 during another lockdown demonstration.
According to police spokesman Stuart Bell, “This type of behaviour not only breaks the law, it also risks spreading the virus between multiple areas of the country. It is for this reason that we urge people not to travel into London and this is also why we will be taking appropriate enforcement action if this happens.”
We assume he’s OK with BLM protests.
Here we go again. Why do the Met #TakeTheKnee to #BlackLivesMatter & soft-soap #ExtinctionRebellion – yet send in the bovver-boys to an anti-lockdown protest, or when somebody they don’t like speaks at Speaker’s Corner? — Martin Daubney (@MartinDaubney) November 28, 2020
Here we go again. Why do the Met #TakeTheKnee to #BlackLivesMatter & soft-soap #ExtinctionRebellion – yet send in the bovver-boys to an anti-lockdown protest, or when somebody they don't like speaks at Speaker's Corner? It's blatant two-tiered policing #londonprotest pic.twitter.com/jq2Pn5fRpL — Martin Daubney (@MartinDaubney) November 28, 2020
“In practice, police are increasingly treating protests as banned,” said Big Brother Watch director Silkie Carlo, who has campaigned for civil liberties during the lockdown. “The incompetence and casual authoritarianism demonstrated by the Met police here is breathtaking. The right to protest is the bedrock of any democracy. It’s clear to me that there’s a deliberate attempt to chill that right and misrepresent the law,” she added.
“As the government takes unprecedented steps to interfere with our rights, sidelines parliament and attacks the rule of law, undermining protest is another threat to our ability to hold it to account and stand up to power. Protest and dissent are the lifeblood of a healthy democracy, and even more so important in a public emergency,” said Gracie Bradley, interim director of rights group “Liberty.”
That’s not all, video also captured people being stopped from getting to the protest.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-29--PA Legislators Put Forward Resolution to Declare Election in Dispute

On the 25th , Judge Patricia McCullough ordered a halt to further certification actions by Pennsylvania .
The issue is the core of the case , Governor Wolf ’ s illegal expansion of mail-in voting , The PA Supreme Court ’ s decision is inevitably , but state legislators have introduced a resolution asking that certification be withdrawn .
And asking Congress to declare the election in dispute .
As discussed before , the conflict here is between PA law and unilateral moves by Wolf and Democrat authorities .
WHEREAS , officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3 , 2020 election in the Commonwealth ; and WHEREAS , on September 17 , 2020 , less than seven weeks before the November 3 , 2020 election , the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received , mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely , and could be accepted without a verified voter signature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2020 , less than two weeks before the November 3 , 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth , the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots , thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime ; and WHEREAS , on November 2 , 2020 , the night before the November 3 , 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots , the office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects ; and WHEREAS , heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots ; and … this really contains the core of the case .
The legal problem continues to fall into the “ whatcha gon na do about it ” category with a federal appeals court declaring it ’ s not their problem and the same state supreme court that behaved corruptly continuing to double @ @ @ @ @ @ @ post , can a state collude to steal votes in a presidential election .
The resolution concludes with a call on state officials and on Congress THEREFORE , be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives— 1 .
Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting , pre-canvassing , and canvassing during the November 3 , 2020 election ; and 2 .
Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly ’ s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections ; and 3 .
Disapproves of and disagrees with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ premature certification of the results of the November 3 , 2020 election regarding presidential electors ; and 4 .
Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute ; and 5 .
Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election ; and 6 .
Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dispute .
It goes without saying that Governor Wolf .
and Co. are not about to back down .
But their abuses have , as a matter of fact , put the election in dispute .
But the question is still , “ whatcha gon na do about it ” .
That ’ s essentially the Democrat legal argument combined with a lot of empty pulpit-pounding about disenfranchisement .

On the 25th, Judge Patricia McCullough ordered a halt to further certification actions by Pennsylvania. The issue is the core of the case, Governor Wolf’s illegal expansion of mail-in voting, The PA Supreme Court’s decision is inevitably, but state legislators have introduced a resolution asking that certification be withdrawn.
And asking Congress to declare the election in dispute.
As discussed before, the conflict here is between PA law and unilateral moves by Wolf and Democrat authorities.
WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and
… this really contains the core of the case.
The legal problem continues to fall into the “whatcha gonna do about it” category with a federal appeals court declaring it’s not their problem and the same state supreme court that behaved corruptly continuing to double down. As discussed in a previous post, can a state collude to steal votes in a presidential election.
The resolution concludes with a call on state officials and on Congress
THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives— 1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and 2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and 3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and 4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and 5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and 6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.
It goes without saying that Governor Wolf. and Co. are not about to back down. But their abuses have, as a matter of fact, put the election in dispute. But the question is still, “whatcha gonna do about it”. That’s essentially the Democrat legal argument combined with a lot of empty pulpit-pounding about disenfranchisement.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-29--Are You Just Gonna Take It? – Los Angeles Unlawfully Cancels Christmas:  All Gatherings Banned Excep

Are You Just Gonna Take It? – Los Angeles Unlawfully Cancels Christmas:  All Gatherings Banned Except Protests & Church

Are You Just Gon na Take It ?
– Los Angeles Unlawfully Cancels Christmas : All Gatherings Banned Except Protests & Church Well are you , Los Angeles ?
What about other parts of the country where tyrants are infringing on your God-given rights over a scamdemic ?
People , it ’ s going to cost you something now , or it ’ s going to cost you a whole lot more later .
It ’ s far past the time that the people dealt with the tyrannical mayors , city councils , county councils , governors and anyone else @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and “ public health ” as a mask , no pun intended , for their tyranny .
The County of Los Angeles , California is no different .
According to the “ Safer at Home Order ” by the County of Los Angeles Public Health : All public and private gatherings with individuals not in your household are prohibited , except for church services and protests .
Occupancy Limites ( all individuals at these sites are required to wear face coverings and keep at least 6 feet of distance ) : Every bit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bit .
Why ?
First , the US Constitution provides protections from the US federal Congress from writing laws against such things in order to not infringe on the rights of the people .
Now , we are not even talking about the feds here .
We are talking about both local elected representatives and unelected bureaucrats infringing on the people ’ s rights .
You see , these rights are God-given and not to be infringed at any level !
Just go back to what our founders declared about the tyranny they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Independence .
When in the Course of human events , it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another , and to assume among the powers of the earth , the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature ’ s God entitle them , a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation .
We hold these truths to be self-evident , that all men are created @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights , Governments are instituted among Men , deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed , –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends , it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it , and to institute new Government , laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form , as to them shall seem most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Besides take-out and delivery , restaurants and bars will remain closed under the new demand .
Certain other “ non-essential ” facilities , such as playgrounds and card rooms , will be closed altogether .
Outdoor recreation will be “ permitted ” , but only for individuals from the same household , who will be required to wear face coverings and remain six feet away from other people .
There should be no illusions as to whether or not you are free at this point .
This won ’ t end until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have any power over us .
LA County .
by far California ’ s most populous with over 10 million residents , has so far recorded more than 387,000 coronavirus cases ( with tests not intended for this purpose ) and some 7,600 deaths , according to official data .
The district has seen a “ surge ” in cases in recent days .
California as a whole is among the worst-affected states in the US , approaching 1.2 million cases and over 19,000 deaths , according to the rigged numbers .
Government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is not a crime and being outside , assembling together and engaging in work are your God-given rights .
In fact , your Creator commands such of you in the first place !
This is not just an attack on basic rights of people , it ’ s an attack on God ’ s law !
Are the people of LA just going to sit back and take this or will they follow in the footsteps of the prophets , Jesus , the apostles and our forefathers who resisted tyranny in obedience @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Sons of Liberty Media

Well are you, Los Angeles? What about other parts of the country where tyrants are infringing on your God-given rights over a scamdemic? People, it’s going to cost you something now, or it’s going to cost you a whole lot more later. It’s far past the time that the people dealt with the tyrannical mayors, city councils, county councils, governors and anyone else that seeks to use “safety” and “public health” as a mask, no pun intended, for their tyranny. The County of Los Angeles, California is no different.
According to the “Safer at Home Order” by the County of Los Angeles Public Health:
Gatherings:
All public and private gatherings with individuals not in your household are prohibited, except for church services and protests.
Occupancy Limites (all individuals at these sites are required to wear face coverings and keep at least 6 feet of distance):
Essential retail: 35% max occupancy
Non-essential retail (including indoor malls): 25% occupancy
Personal care services: 20% max occupancy
Libraries:30% max occupancy
Fitness centers operating outdoors: 50% max occupancy
Museums, galleries, zoos, aquariums, botanical gardens operating outdoors: 50% max occupancy
Mini-gold, batting cages, go-kart racing operating outdoors: 50% max occupancy
Every bit of this is unconstitutional! Every single bit.
Why? First, the US Constitution provides protections from the US federal Congress from writing laws against such things in order to not infringe on the rights of the people.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Amendment I of the US Constitution
Now, we are not even talking about the feds here. We are talking about both local elected representatives and unelected bureaucrats infringing on the people’s rights.
You see, these rights are God-given and not to be infringed at any level! Just go back to what our founders declared about the tyranny they were fighting against in the War for Independence.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Mac Slavo reports:
Besides take-out and delivery, restaurants and bars will remain closed under the new demand. Certain other “non-essential” facilities, such as playgrounds and card rooms, will be closed altogether. Outdoor recreation will be “permitted”, but only for individuals from the same household, who will be required to wear face coverings and remain six feet away from other people.
There should be no illusions as to whether or not you are free at this point. This won’t end until we all decided these tyrants do not have any power over us.
LA County. by far California’s most populous with over 10 million residents, has so far recorded more than 387,000 coronavirus cases (with tests not intended for this purpose) and some 7,600 deaths, according to official data. The district has seen a “surge” in cases in recent days. California as a whole is among the worst-affected states in the US, approaching 1.2 million cases and over 19,000 deaths, according to the rigged numbers.
Government has zero authority declaring what you do that is not a crime and being outside, assembling together and engaging in work are your God-given rights. In fact, your Creator commands such of you in the first place! This is not just an attack on basic rights of people, it’s an attack on God’s law!
Are the people of LA just going to sit back and take this or will they follow in the footsteps of the prophets, Jesus, the apostles and our forefathers who resisted tyranny in obedience to God?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-29--Nearly 100 Cops Try & Keep A Canadian Restaurant Closed Over CONvid-1984 As Protesters Organize (Vid

Nearly 100 Cops Try & Keep A Canadian Restaurant Closed Over CONvid-1984 As Protesters Organize ( Video ) This is what it has come to : Decent people being barred and even arrested for wanting to eat together while entire police forces are dispatched to the location of said eatery to not only arrest the owner , but to mobilize like a platoon against those who wish to protest and eat !
Meanwhile , criminals continue to do what they will in the city and even be loosed in the name of CONvid-1984 .
The latest round of this tyranny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where the owner was not only arrested , but nearly 100 cops showed up to bar people ’ s entry into the establishment .
After a day of turmoil , the City of Toronto has ordered Adamson Barbecue to close under Sec .
22 of the Health Protection and Promotion Act .
A release from the city state that an investigation was “ immediately launched ” when the restaurant began operating on Tuesday morning , going against the Reopening Ontario Act , which included both indoor and outdoor dining services , “ many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ physical distancing in place .
“ Despite Ontario regulations requiring all restaurants to be closed , except for takeout , delivery and drive-through , this establishment opened its doors to patrons for dine-in eating in contravention of the law that is designed to protect people from the spread of COVID-19 , ” a tweet from the city reads .
The City of Toronto is also investigating Adamson Barbecue for its compliance with business licensing , zoning , public health , Ontario Building Code and the Ontario Fire Code requirements .
Despite Toronto being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barbecue decided to open on Tuesday dine-in service , going against the provincial orders .
“ For those of you have eyes to see why I ’ m doing this , thank you guys so much , ” he said .
“ Thank you for letting me know that have people in our corner.
” “ This is a risky move and you guys gave me the gas to do this.
” Look at the ridiculousness of Canada .
On Thursday , police changed the locks on the restaurant , but allowed Skelly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believed was not covered by the closure order from Toronto Public Health .
However according to police , his supporters smashed through drywall to access the restaurant area to try and reopen it .
Skelly was led away in handcuffs and now faces a number of charges , including attempting to obstruct police , mischief under , failing to comply with a continued order under the Reopening Ontario Act , and failing to leave when directed under the Trespass to Property Act .
He appeared in court via video link on Friday and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 50,000 bail .
Under the conditions of his bail , Skelly must stay 200 metres away from Adamson Barbecue , as well as his two other businesses ; He is not to operate a business except in accordance with the Reopening Ontario Act ; He must obey the Health Protection Act , as well as all lawful orders by Ontario ’ s Chief Public Health Officer and the Regional Public Health Officer .
As well , he must not communicate on social media .
“ It took so long today because a crown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ level on what my bail conditions should be , ” Skelly told reporters after being released .
“ One of those bail conditions is that I ’ m not allowed to use , communicate , or post on social media .
That to me is really interesting .
I wonder what it is that the province doesn ’ t want everybody to know.
” Another man , 27-year-old Michael Belito Arana of Markham , was also arrested at the restaurant Thursday following a confrontation with police .
He has been charged with obstructing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police officer , two counts of uttering a death threat , and one count of failing to comply with a continued order under the Reopening Ontario Act .
In the meantime , Toronto Public Health has completely seized the premises of Adamson Barbecue and the city boarded up the building .
While the restaurant has seen a crowd of supporters every day , many without masks , a number of other businesses in the area have complained that Adamson is flouting the rules while those observing them continue to suffer a loss of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already collected more than $ 175,000 on Adamson ’ s behalf .
Protests formed after nearly 100 cops , some horse mounted , showed up to keep people from entering .
If only they put this much effort into dealing with actual criminals !
The video above should show you not only whose side these cops are on , but who is in their sights .
Here ’ s a hint : It ’ s not the criminals .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Nearly 100 Cops Try & Keep A Canadian Restaurant Closed Over CONvid-1984 As Protesters Organize (Video)
This is what it has come to: Decent people being barred and even arrested for wanting to eat together while entire police forces are dispatched to the location of said eatery to not only arrest the owner, but to mobilize like a platoon against those who wish to protest and eat! Meanwhile, criminals continue to do what they will in the city and even be loosed in the name of CONvid-1984. The latest round of this tyranny comes out of Canada at Adamson Barbeque where the owner was not only arrested, but nearly 100 cops showed up to bar people’s entry into the establishment.
Here we go. Bylaw officers arrive at Adamson BBQ after the restaurant defied lockdown orders this morning and opened its doors to indoor dining. #covid19ontario pic.twitter.com/qlhffuu4x8 — Kamil Karamali (@KamilKaramali) November 24, 2020
Yahoo News reports:
After a day of turmoil, the City of Toronto has ordered Adamson Barbecue to close under Sec. 22 of the Health Protection and Promotion Act.
A release from the city state that an investigation was “immediately launched” when the restaurant began operating on Tuesday morning, going against the Reopening Ontario Act, which included both indoor and outdoor dining services, “many patrons” not wearing masks and no physical distancing in place.
“Despite Ontario regulations requiring all restaurants to be closed, except for takeout, delivery and drive-through, this establishment opened its doors to patrons for dine-in eating in contravention of the law that is designed to protect people from the spread of COVID-19,” a tweet from the city reads.
The City of Toronto is also investigating Adamson Barbecue for its compliance with business licensing, zoning, public health, Ontario Building Code and the Ontario Fire Code requirements.
Day’s events, reaction for Adamson Barbecue’s lockdown defiance
Despite Toronto being in lockdown restrictions, Etobicoke restaurant Adamson Barbecue decided to open on Tuesday dine-in service, going against the provincial orders.
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Adamson Barbecue (@adamsonbarbecue)
“For those of you have eyes to see why I’m doing this, thank you guys so much,” he said. “Thank you for letting me know that have people in our corner.”
“This is a risky move and you guys gave me the gas to do this.”
Look at the ridiculousness of Canada.
Toronto’s CTV News reports:
On Thursday, police changed the locks on the restaurant, but allowed Skelly into a portion of the building they believed was not covered by the closure order from Toronto Public Health.
However according to police, his supporters smashed through drywall to access the restaurant area to try and reopen it.
Skelly was led away in handcuffs and now faces a number of charges, including attempting to obstruct police, mischief under, failing to comply with a continued order under the Reopening Ontario Act, and failing to leave when directed under the Trespass to Property Act.
He appeared in court via video link on Friday and was released after his wife posted $50,000 bail.
Under the conditions of his bail, Skelly must stay 200 metres away from Adamson Barbecue, as well as his two other businesses; He is not to operate a business except in accordance with the Reopening Ontario Act; He must obey the Health Protection Act, as well as all lawful orders by Ontario’s Chief Public Health Officer and the Regional Public Health Officer. As well, he must not communicate on social media.
“It took so long today because a crown attorney was being advised at a province level on what my bail conditions should be,” Skelly told reporters after being released.
“One of those bail conditions is that I’m not allowed to use, communicate, or post on social media. That to me is really interesting. I wonder what it is that the province doesn’t want everybody to know.”
Another man, 27-year-old Michael Belito Arana of Markham, was also arrested at the restaurant Thursday following a confrontation with police. He has been charged with obstructing police, six counts of assaulting a police officer, two counts of uttering a death threat, and one count of failing to comply with a continued order under the Reopening Ontario Act.
In the meantime, Toronto Public Health has completely seized the premises of Adamson Barbecue and the city boarded up the building.
While the restaurant has seen a crowd of supporters every day, many without masks, a number of other businesses in the area have complained that Adamson is flouting the rules while those observing them continue to suffer a loss of business.
An online fundraising effort has already collected more than $175,000 on Adamson’s behalf.
Protests formed after nearly 100 cops, some horse mounted, showed up to keep people from entering.
If only they put this much effort into dealing with actual criminals! The video above should show you not only whose side these cops are on, but who is in their sights. Here’s a hint: It’s not the criminals.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media