thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-16--Will Biden Listen to the Science?

Will Biden Listen to the Science?

Former Vice President Joe Biden has not been officially declared the winner of the 2020 presidential election , but that has not stopped him from forming a coronavirus task force .
The task force is composed of supporters of increased government control .
One idea Biden and his task force are considering is a four to six weeks nationwide lockdown .
However , supporting a nationwide lockdown would violate Biden ’ s campaign pledge to “ listen to the science.
” The evidence regarding lockdowns is so overwhelming that even the World Health Organization ( WHO ) has been forced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more harm than good .
Lockdowns result in more instances of depression , suicide , domestic violence , and alcohol and drug abuse .
Lockdowns also cause people to not go to hospitals or doctors ’ offices , leading to people dying because they failed to obtain medical assistance in a timely manner .
Biden also is working with governors , mayors , and other state and local officials to create a de facto national mask mandate .
Biden has also declared he will mandate mask-wearing in all federal buildings and for people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interstate travel could mean you will be required to wear a mask on airplanes , trains , and even when driving in your own car if you cross state lines .
Yet again , Biden is ignoring the science .
In this case , the science has demonstrated that most masks are ineffective at preventing the spread of a virus .
Medical science also shows that wearing a mask for extended periods of time can cause health problems .
For example , mask-wearing interferes with proper breathing .
Long-term mask-wearing may also cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ victims of mask mandates include low-wage workers Biden and his fellow progressives claim to care so much about .
Many of these workers are required to wear masks on the job .
Biden has also proposed raising an army of “ culturally competent ” contact tracers .
According to the University of California , San Francisco , which is helping train that California ’ s contact tracers , contract tracers “ ….ask questions related to topics that can be sensitive , including health , work , living arrangements and food resources ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quarantined .
These contract tracers could also be able to enforce masks or other mandates — including a potential vaccine mandate — by helping ensure that those who refuse to comply are indefinitely quarantined .
Biden is not the only politician pushing authoritarian “ solutions ” to coronavirus .
The government of Washington , DC is considering authorizing vaccinating of children without parental consent .
This ignores the science that some people will have a negative reaction even to a generally safe vaccine , so individuals should make their own decision in consultation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ important these days , as we are dealing with a vaccine that is being rushed into production for political reasons and that even the manufacturers admit will have serious side effects .
Lockdowns , masks , and other authoritarian measures do little or nothing to promote health .
Instead , they erode freedom and create their own health problems .
Those who know the truth must make Joe Biden and other authoritarians listen to the true science .
While those more at risk — such as the elderly and people with certain health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extra precautions , all Americans should be given back the liberty to make their own healthcare decisions .
Dr. Ron Paul is an American physician , author , and former politician who served as the U.S. Representative for Texas 's 14th congressional district , which includes Galveston , from 1997 to 2013 as well as the 22nd congressional district for special term between 1976 and 1977 , when he lost reelection in 1978 , and for 3 later terms , from 1979 to 1985 .
On three occasions , he sought the presidency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Libertarian Party candidate in 1988 and as a candidate in the Republican primaries in 2008 and 2012 .
Paul is best known for his libertarian views and is a critic of American foreign , domestic , and monetary policies , including the military–industrial complex , the War on Drugs , and the Federal Reserve .
Paul has been married to Carol Wells since 1957 .
They have five children , 18 grandchildren and 4 great grandchildren .
Ron Paul produces a weekly column known as Ron Paul 's Texas Straight Talk and is @ @ @ @ @

Former Vice President Joe Biden has not been officially declared the winner of the 2020 presidential election, but that has not stopped him from forming a coronavirus task force. The task force is composed of supporters of increased government control.
One idea Biden and his task force are considering is a four to six weeks nationwide lockdown. However, supporting a nationwide lockdown would violate Biden’s campaign pledge to “listen to the science.” The evidence regarding lockdowns is so overwhelming that even the World Health Organization (WHO) has been forced to admit the truth: lockdowns do more harm than good.
Lockdowns result in more instances of depression, suicide, domestic violence, and alcohol and drug abuse. Lockdowns also cause people to not go to hospitals or doctors’ offices, leading to people dying because they failed to obtain medical assistance in a timely manner.
Biden also is working with governors, mayors, and other state and local officials to create a de facto national mask mandate. Biden has also declared he will mandate mask-wearing in all federal buildings and for people traveling interstate. A mask mandate for interstate travel could mean you will be required to wear a mask on airplanes, trains, and even when driving in your own car if you cross state lines.
Yet again, Biden is ignoring the science. In this case, the science has demonstrated that most masks are ineffective at preventing the spread of a virus. Medical science also shows that wearing a mask for extended periods of time can cause health problems. For example, mask-wearing interferes with proper breathing. Long-term mask-wearing may also cause serious dental problems. Ironically, major victims of mask mandates include low-wage workers Biden and his fellow progressives claim to care so much about. Many of these workers are required to wear masks on the job.
Biden has also proposed raising an army of “culturally competent” contact tracers. According to the University of California, San Francisco, which is helping train that California’s contact tracers, contract tracers “….ask questions related to topics that can be sensitive, including health, work, living arrangements and food resources” in order to identify someone who should be quarantined. These contract tracers could also be able to enforce masks or other mandates — including a potential vaccine mandate — by helping ensure that those who refuse to comply are indefinitely quarantined.
Biden is not the only politician pushing authoritarian “solutions” to coronavirus. The government of Washington, DC is considering authorizing vaccinating of children without parental consent. This ignores the science that some people will have a negative reaction even to a generally safe vaccine, so individuals should make their own decision in consultation with their physician. This is especially important these days, as we are dealing with a vaccine that is being rushed into production for political reasons and that even the manufacturers admit will have serious side effects.
Lockdowns, masks, and other authoritarian measures do little or nothing to promote health. Instead, they erode freedom and create their own health problems. Those who know the truth must make Joe Biden and other authoritarians listen to the true science. While those more at risk — such as the elderly and people with certain health problems — could be encouraged to take extra precautions, all Americans should be given back the liberty to make their own healthcare decisions.
Article posted with permission from Ron Paul


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-16--Austria’s Kurz & Germany’s Merkel On Collision Course About How to Oppose Jihad Terror

The German-language Austrian publication Kronen Zeitung reported Tuesday that Austria ’ s Chancellor Sebastian Kurz flew to Paris in order to “ coordinate ‘ on a European level ’ with French President Emmanuel Macron on the ‘ fight against political Islam.
’ ” This coordination involved a video conference that included German Chancellor Angela Merkel , European Union Council President Charles Michel , European Commission President Angela von der Leyen , and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte .
They all “ announced that they would join forces and reform the Schengen rules.
” But like so many things , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ examine the details .
“ More far-reaching measures must be taken so that we can live safely in Europe and defend our way of life , ” said Kurz , and who could argue with that ?
“ We are in constant danger , ” Kurz added , and pointed out that the European Union was full of “ ticking time bombs ” that is , thousands of “ foreign fighters.
” No argument there , either .
But what did he and his colleagues propose to do about it ?
Initially , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were on the right track : Macron “ suggested implementing measures that have already been planned and decided in the fight against political Islam , or accelerating their implementation.
” These would include not only “ against hate propaganda on the Internet and a reform of the Schengen rules , ” but also “ the linking of common databases so that the security services of the individual states can work better together.
” Macron declared : “ It takes reforms to enjoy our freedom and security.
” Why yes , Mr. Macron , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the courage to implement the reforms that would genuinely protect Europeans from further jihad massacres , such as immigration restrictions from jihadi hotspots and strict enforcement of the principle of one law for all , which would be a direct challenge to Sharia enclaves ?
None of that appeared to be even on the table at this video conference .
The Kronen Zeitung reported some of the Austrian Chancellor ’ s recommendations : “ It is now very important to secure the EU ’ s external borders and to examine the financing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like to fight above all the ideological basis behind the terror.
” Good : the “ ideological basis behind the terror ” has for nearly two decades now been ignored , denied , and obfuscated , while those who have dared to point it out have been vilified , demonized , stigmatized , marginalized , and silenced .
And German Chancellor Angela Merkel quickly made it clear that this willful ignorance is still very much with us , as she “ declared that terrorism is not a conflict between Islam and Christianity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ condemned , ’ said Merkel .
In doing so , she wants to increasingly rely on a joint approach with Islamic countries.
” Meanwhile , EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen “ emphasized that one now wants to make the major Internet platforms more responsible .
They are now to be obliged to process references to dangerous content within an hour and to delete them as quickly as possible.
” So while Kurz wants to “ fight above all the ideological basis behind the terror , ” Merkel “ declared that terrorism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Christianity .
‘ Every form of religious hatred is condemned.
’ ” That ’ s just wonderful , but in saying it , Merkel is making it clear that she is not willing “ to fight above all the ideological basis behind the terror.
” She is not even willing to admit what that ideological basis is .
So will she approve of Europe-wide measures that would actually take on this ideology ?
Absolutely not .
In light of the undeniable fact that Germany and probably the rest of the European Union will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the world about the ideological basis behind jihad terrorism , Ursula von der Leyen ’ s statement is nothing more than ominous .
Given the European Union ’ s stance on what constitutes terrorism , the “ dangerous content ” that she wants quickly removed is much more likely to be “ right-wing extremism ” than incitement to jihadist violence .
But in the long-established usage of the European Union , “ right-wing extremism ” includes any honest discussion of the “ ideological basis behind the terror.
” So that is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and silenced quickly .
Thus the situation is most likely to be that these European leaders started out fighting against “ political Islam ” and will end up enacting measures that restrict any actual effective defense measures against “ political Islam.
” These are the amusing little ironies that accompany the death of a once-great civilization .

The German-language Austrian publication Kronen Zeitung reported Tuesday that Austria’s Chancellor Sebastian Kurz flew to Paris in order to “coordinate ‘on a European level’ with French President Emmanuel Macron on the ‘fight against political Islam.’” This coordination involved a video conference that included German Chancellor Angela Merkel, European Union Council President Charles Michel, European Commission President Angela von der Leyen, and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte. They all “announced that they would join forces and reform the Schengen rules.” But like so many things, it all sounded great until one started to examine the details.
“More far-reaching measures must be taken so that we can live safely in Europe and defend our way of life,” said Kurz, and who could argue with that? “We are in constant danger,” Kurz added, and pointed out that the European Union was full of “ticking time bombs” that is, thousands of “foreign fighters.” No argument there, either. But what did he and his colleagues propose to do about it?
Initially, it looked as if the Euro honchos were on the right track: Macron “suggested implementing measures that have already been planned and decided in the fight against political Islam, or accelerating their implementation.”
These would include not only “against hate propaganda on the Internet and a reform of the Schengen rules,” but also “the linking of common databases so that the security services of the individual states can work better together.” Macron declared: “It takes reforms to enjoy our freedom and security.”
Why yes, Mr. Macron, yes it does. But does Europe have the courage to implement the reforms that would genuinely protect Europeans from further jihad massacres, such as immigration restrictions from jihadi hotspots and strict enforcement of the principle of one law for all, which would be a direct challenge to Sharia enclaves? None of that appeared to be even on the table at this video conference.
The Kronen Zeitung reported some of the Austrian Chancellor’s recommendations: “It is now very important to secure the EU’s external borders and to examine the financing of associations and institutions; Kurz would like to fight above all the ideological basis behind the terror.”
Good: the “ideological basis behind the terror” has for nearly two decades now been ignored, denied, and obfuscated, while those who have dared to point it out have been vilified, demonized, stigmatized, marginalized, and silenced. And German Chancellor Angela Merkel quickly made it clear that this willful ignorance is still very much with us, as she “declared that terrorism is not a conflict between Islam and Christianity. ‘Every form of religious hatred is condemned,’ said Merkel. In doing so, she wants to increasingly rely on a joint approach with Islamic countries.”
Meanwhile, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen “emphasized that one now wants to make the major Internet platforms more responsible. They are now to be obliged to process references to dangerous content within an hour and to delete them as quickly as possible.”
So while Kurz wants to “fight above all the ideological basis behind the terror,” Merkel “declared that terrorism is not a conflict between Islam and Christianity. ‘Every form of religious hatred is condemned.’”
That’s just wonderful, but in saying it, Merkel is making it clear that she is not willing “to fight above all the ideological basis behind the terror.” She is not even willing to admit what that ideological basis is. So will she approve of Europe-wide measures that would actually take on this ideology? Absolutely not.
In light of the undeniable fact that Germany and probably the rest of the European Union will continue to deny and lie to themselves and the world about the ideological basis behind jihad terrorism, Ursula von der Leyen’s statement is nothing more than ominous. Given the European Union’s stance on what constitutes terrorism, the “dangerous content” that she wants quickly removed is much more likely to be “right-wing extremism” than incitement to jihadist violence. But in the long-established usage of the European Union, “right-wing extremism” includes any honest discussion of the “ideological basis behind the terror.” So that is what is most likely to be silenced, and silenced quickly.
Thus the situation is most likely to be that these European leaders started out fighting against “political Islam” and will end up enacting measures that restrict any actual effective defense measures against “political Islam.” These are the amusing little ironies that accompany the death of a once-great civilization.
Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-16--REPORT: Biden Cancer Initiative GAVE ZERO TO CANCER RESEARCH – Spent Millions On Payroll

Biden is not legitimate .
In anything .
Of course , if the enemy of the people , the media , had done any real reporting on the Biden crime family , this , too , would have been known before the election .
The Biden Cancer Initiative was founded in 2017 by the former vice president and his wife Jill Biden to “ develop and drive implementation of solutions to accelerate progress in cancer prevention , detection , diagnosis , research and care and to reduce disparities in cancer outcomes , ” according to its IRS mission statement .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ its first two years , and spent millions on the salaries of former Washington DC aides it hired .
Biden Cancer Initiative spent millions on payroll , zero on research : report Tax filings reveal Biden cancer charity spent millions on salaries , zero on research A cancer charity started by Joe Biden gave out no money to research , and spent most of its contributions on staff salaries , federal filings show .
The Biden Cancer Initiative was founded in 2017 by the former vice president and his wife Jill Biden to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to accelerate progress in cancer prevention , detection , diagnosis , research and care and to reduce disparities in cancer outcomes , ” according to its IRS mission statement .
But it gave out no grants in its first two years , and spent millions on the salaries of former Washington DC aides it hired .
The charity took in $ 4,809,619 in contributions in fiscal years 2017 and 2018 , and spent $ 3,070,301 on payroll in those two years .
The group ’ s president , Gregory Simon , raked in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 , 2018 to June 30 , 2019 ) , according to the charity ’ s most recent federal tax filings .
Simon , a former Pfizer executive and longtime health care lobbyist who headed up the White House ’ s cancer task force in the Obama administration , saw his salary nearly double from the $ 224,539 he made in fiscal 2017 , tax filings show .
Danielle Carnival , former chief of staff for Obama ’ s cancer initiative , the Cancer Moonshot Task Force , who took home $ 258,207 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 56,738 on conferences and $ 59,356 on travel that year .
The following year , the travel expenditure swelled to $ 97,149 , and the non-profit spent $ 742,953 on conferences , tax filings show .
Biden2 But under grants distributed , it listed zero .
Simon had said that the main point of the charity was not to give out grants , and that its goal was to find ways to accelerate treatment for all , regardless of their economic or cultural backgrounds .
Biden headed up the Cancer Moonshot Task Force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beau died of a brain tumor in 2015 .
After leaving office , the Biden Cancer Initiative sought to continue such efforts to provide “ urgent ” solutions to treating cancer , according to a 2017 press statement announcing its launch .
see also The Bidens stacked the board with leading oncologists and celebrity cancer survivors , including musician Jimmy Gomez from the Black Eyed Peas .
After only two years , the charity “ paused ” its operations when Biden and his wife stepped down for Joe Biden ’ s presidential run @ @ @ @ @ @ @ active , according to the IRS , Simon said in a 2019 interview that without the Bidens at the helm , the charity lost its edge .
“ We tried to power through but it became increasingly difficult to get the traction we needed to complete our mission , ” he told the AP in July 2019 .
Neither Simon nor Biden could be reached for comment last week .

Biden is not legitimate. In anything. Of course, if the enemy of the people, the media, had done any real reporting on the Biden crime family, this, too, would have been known before the election. The Biden Cancer Initiative was founded in 2017 by the former vice president and his wife Jill Biden to “develop and drive implementation of solutions to accelerate progress in cancer prevention, detection, diagnosis, research and care and to reduce disparities in cancer outcomes,” according to its IRS mission statement. But it gave out no grants in its first two years, and spent millions on the salaries of former Washington DC aides it hired.
Biden Cancer Initiative spent millions on payroll, zero on research: report
Tax filings reveal Biden cancer charity spent millions on salaries, zero on research
By Isabel Vincent, November 14, 2020 |
A cancer charity started by Joe Biden gave out no money to research, and spent most of its contributions on staff salaries, federal filings show.
The Biden Cancer Initiative was founded in 2017 by the former vice president and his wife Jill Biden to “develop and drive implementation of solutions to accelerate progress in cancer prevention, detection, diagnosis, research and care and to reduce disparities in cancer outcomes,” according to its IRS mission statement. But it gave out no grants in its first two years, and spent millions on the salaries of former Washington DC aides it hired.
The charity took in $4,809,619 in contributions in fiscal years 2017 and 2018, and spent $3,070,301 on payroll in those two years. The group’s president, Gregory Simon, raked in $429,850 in fiscal 2018 (July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019), according to the charity’s most recent federal tax filings.
Simon, a former Pfizer executive and longtime health care lobbyist who headed up the White House’s cancer task force in the Obama administration, saw his salary nearly double from the $224,539 he made in fiscal 2017, tax filings show.
Danielle Carnival, former chief of staff for Obama’s cancer initiative, the Cancer Moonshot Task Force, who took home $258,207 in 2018.
The charity spent $56,738 on conferences and $59,356 on travel that year. The following year, the travel expenditure swelled to $97,149, and the non-profit spent $742,953 on conferences, tax filings show.
Biden2
But under grants distributed, it listed zero.
Simon had said that the main point of the charity was not to give out grants, and that its goal was to find ways to accelerate treatment for all, regardless of their economic or cultural backgrounds.
Biden headed up the Cancer Moonshot Task Force when he was veep after his son Beau died of a brain tumor in 2015. After leaving office, the Biden Cancer Initiative sought to continue such efforts to provide “urgent” solutions to treating cancer, according to a 2017 press statement announcing its launch.
see also
Biden introduced Ukraine exec to VP dad: emails
The Bidens stacked the board with leading oncologists and celebrity cancer survivors, including musician Jimmy Gomez from the Black Eyed Peas.
After only two years, the charity “paused” its operations when Biden and his wife stepped down for Joe Biden’s presidential run.
Although the organization is still officially active, according to the IRS, Simon said in a 2019 interview that without the Bidens at the helm, the charity lost its edge.
“We tried to power through but it became increasingly difficult to get the traction we needed to complete our mission,” he told the AP in July 2019.
Neither Simon nor Biden could be reached for comment last week.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-16--Florida:  “Monster” Cop Receives Unprecedented Life Sentence For Horrifying Acts Of Child Sexual Bat

Florida:  “Monster” Cop Receives Unprecedented Life Sentence For Horrifying Acts Of Child Sexual Battery

Citrus County , FL — As the Free Thought Project reports on a regular basis , police officers are caught preying on society ’ s most vulnerable on a weekly basis .
Most of the time , even when they are found guilty of utterly revolting crimes against children , they receive only wrist slaps and avoid a just punishment .
One law enforcement officer in Florida described by many as a monster , however , just made the exception to the rule and has been sentenced to life in prison for his crimes against children .
Kenneth Slanker , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the Coleman Correctional Complex in Sumter County when he was accused of horrifying sexual battery against a child under the age of 10 .
The Citrus County Sheriff ’ s Office ’ s Special Victim ’ s Unit began their investigation into Slanker in 2019 over allegations that he began abusing a girl when she was just 5 .
He was quickly arrested and went to trial earlier this year .
Before a warrant was even issued for his arrest , Slanker turned himself into authorities .
The crimes were so horrifying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a monster .
During a recorded police interview , Slanker admitted to abusing the girl “ between 20 and 25 times , ” calling himself “ a monster , ” but denied it happening for 10 years .
“ I didn ’ t want any of it … it ’ s just like something takes over ; your body starts shaking … I really don ’ t know how to explain it , ” Slanker told Conley before his arrest .
“ I ’ m sorry , and it ’ s not her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make sure she doesn ’ t have to testify … I ’ m not going to fight it.
” This month , he was sentenced to life in prison for multiple charges of child sexual battery and the girl did actually testify .
During the brief one day trial in February , the girl , now 16 , testified to Slanker first abusing her when she was 5 years old , and showing her pornography when she was 8 .
“ ( Slanker ) is a monster , ” Assistant State Attorney Shannon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trial .
“ That ’ s not actually my words , that ’ s the defendant ’ s .
… He claimed he was a monster because he did this.
” The girl said Slanker ’ s abuse became a norm in her life she couldn ’ t escape from .
“ I didn ’ t want to go through any of that but I didn ’ t have a choice , ” she said .
“ It was very secretive , he made sure he had a way around it.
” She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threaten her when she didn ’ t agree to his demands , or if she was thinking of telling someone .
“ I didn ’ t have a way out of it , ” she said .
Because Slanker had access to the girl any time he wanted , she had no way of telling anyone as she was scared of what he would do .
However , she suffered a sports injury and went through surgeries starting in November 2018 , and it kept Slanker from abusing her , and allowed her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , she testified .
“ I was done keeping it away all the time , ” she said , adding she didn ’ t want to report Slanker to authorities .
“ I felt like it would do more harm than good.
” Thankfully , she got over those fears and this monster is now going to jail where he belongs .
Prosecutors also called a 20-year-old woman to the witness stand who testified to Slanker abusing her in similar ways and numerous times when she was younger .
“ I ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” she testified , “ and I finally get justice.
” After the sentencing , the sheriff ’ s department took to distancing themselves from this monster .
“ Kenneth Slanker is a textbook example of a sexual predator .
He betrayed , manipulated , and victimized this innocent child , ” Sheriff Mike Prendergast said at the time .
“ Due to the excellent work by Citrus County Sheriff ’ s Office Detectives Ricci and Barry , Kenneth Slanker will never have the opportunity to prey on another child as long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Although no amount of prison time will undo what he has done to this innocent child , the victim and the victim ’ s family now have closure and a sense of justice.
” During an interview , Slanker had some final words .
“ There ’ s something wrong with me .
… People like me deserve a bullet in their head , ” Slanker said .
“ They ’ re going to put me away forever , and that ’ s where I need to be .
… Please @ @ @ @ @

Citrus County, FL — As the Free Thought Project reports on a regular basis, police officers are caught preying on society’s most vulnerable on a weekly basis. Most of the time, even when they are found guilty of utterly revolting crimes against children, they receive only wrist slaps and avoid a just punishment. One law enforcement officer in Florida described by many as a monster, however, just made the exception to the rule and has been sentenced to life in prison for his crimes against children.
Kenneth Slanker, 41, worked as a corrections officer at the Coleman Correctional Complex in Sumter County when he was accused of horrifying sexual battery against a child under the age of 10.
The Citrus County Sheriff’s Office’s Special Victim’s Unit began their investigation into Slanker in 2019 over allegations that he began abusing a girl when she was just 5. He was quickly arrested and went to trial earlier this year.
Before a warrant was even issued for his arrest, Slanker turned himself into authorities. The crimes were so horrifying that even Slanker referred to himself as a monster.
During a recorded police interview, Slanker admitted to abusing the girl “between 20 and 25 times,” calling himself “a monster,” but denied it happening for 10 years.
“I didn’t want any of it … it’s just like something takes over; your body starts shaking … I really don’t know how to explain it,” Slanker told Conley before his arrest. “I’m sorry, and it’s not her fault. … I just want to make sure she doesn’t have to testify … I’m not going to fight it.”
This month, he was sentenced to life in prison for multiple charges of child sexual battery and the girl did actually testify.
During the brief one day trial in February, the girl, now 16, testified to Slanker first abusing her when she was 5 years old, and showing her pornography when she was 8.
“(Slanker) is a monster,” Assistant State Attorney Shannon Schlarf said in opening statements at the trial. “That’s not actually my words, that’s the defendant’s. … He claimed he was a monster because he did this.”
The girl said Slanker’s abuse became a norm in her life she couldn’t escape from.
“I didn’t want to go through any of that but I didn’t have a choice,” she said. “It was very secretive, he made sure he had a way around it.”
She told the court that this monster would threaten her when she didn’t agree to his demands, or if she was thinking of telling someone.
“I didn’t have a way out of it,” she said.
Because Slanker had access to the girl any time he wanted, she had no way of telling anyone as she was scared of what he would do. However, she suffered a sports injury and went through surgeries starting in November 2018, and it kept Slanker from abusing her, and allowed her to tell relatives a few months later, she testified.
“I was done keeping it away all the time,” she said, adding she didn’t want to report Slanker to authorities. “I felt like it would do more harm than good.”
Thankfully, she got over those fears and this monster is now going to jail where he belongs.
Prosecutors also called a 20-year-old woman to the witness stand who testified to Slanker abusing her in similar ways and numerous times when she was younger.
“I’ve spent a lot of years suppressing this,” she testified, “and I finally get justice.”
After the sentencing, the sheriff’s department took to distancing themselves from this monster.
“Kenneth Slanker is a textbook example of a sexual predator. He betrayed, manipulated, and victimized this innocent child,” Sheriff Mike Prendergast said at the time.
“Due to the excellent work by Citrus County Sheriff’s Office Detectives Ricci and Barry, Kenneth Slanker will never have the opportunity to prey on another child as long as he lives,” Prendergast said. “Although no amount of prison time will undo what he has done to this innocent child, the victim and the victim’s family now have closure and a sense of justice.”
During an interview, Slanker had some final words.
“There’s something wrong with me. … People like me deserve a bullet in their head,” Slanker said. “They’re going to put me away forever, and that’s where I need to be. … Please put me away.”
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-16--ATF Is Now Literally Changing Gun Definitions – Turning Legal Gun Owners Into Felons Overnight

I told you that when the Trump Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco , Firearms and Explosives ( BATFE ) unlawfully redefined machine gun to do away with a bump stocks in an ex post facto manner , which is also unconstitutional , that it would be the stepping stone to advance on the rights of the people further .
Many gave excuses due to their political idol being in the White House .
Well , now it isn ’ t so funny and I ’ ve been proven right about what I said .
Now , the unconstitutional ATF is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ firearm.
” Gun Control Lawsuit Wants ATF to Reinterpret Definition of “ Firearm ” What if government agents could , by declaration , make you into a criminal ?
What if , without legislative change , bureaucrats could decide that what was legal yesterday is a felony today ?
What if we were governed not by law , but by arbitrary statements telling us what we may or may not do ?
Unfortunately , those questions are not merely hypothetical—thanks to recent abuses of power by the Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , millions of American gun owners are facing them head-on .
Even if you hate guns , you should be deeply concerned by the arbitrary power wielded by the ATF against your fellow Americans .
If an unchecked executive agency can run roughshod over any of our rights with impunity , all of our rights are in danger .
Recently , the firearms manufacturer Q , LLC shared disturbing news with its customers : the ATF had declared the delightfully-named and popular “ Honey Badger ” pistol to be a “ short-barreled rifle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subjects the firearm to special restrictions under the National Firearms Act ( NFA ) .
As a consequence of the ATF ’ s decision , customers who had purchased the Honey Badger have suddenly found themselves in felonious possession of a now-illegal firearm that they had legally acquired and legally owned .
The ATF ’ s determination is arbitrary .
It is inconsistent with both federal law and prior ATF statements .
Substantially similar firearms continue to be sold legally , as they have been for years .
Instead of explaining what makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the ATF vaguely alluded to “ objective design features , ” offering no further explanation as to what those features are or why they lead the ATF to determine that the Honey Badger is an SBR .
• The ATF & The Honey Badger , Another Ex Post Facto Reaction Like The Bump Stock Ban ?
• So , The Unconstitutional ATF Is Attacking The Q Honey Badger Pistol – You Can Get One Absolutely Free !
• Suspension of Honey Badger Ban an Opportunity to Find Out Who Authorized It • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rein in ATF ’ s Arbitrary Determination on “ Honey Badger ” Pistol • Rogue ATF Leadership Targets the Honey Badger & Gun Voters Before the Election • Your Action Needed : Urge the Department of Justice to Rein in ATF ’ s Arbitrary Determination on “ Honey Badger ” Pistol !
This is far from the first time that the ATF has issued a declaration that turns innocent people into criminals — other examples abound .
As I explained in Felony by Fiat : In 2015 , the ATF decided that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with an ATF-approved brace to one ’ s shoulder was equivalent to creating an illegal short-barreled firearm .
That is to say , you could pick up your perfectly legal pistol ( which is not otherwise subject to the NFA ’ s minimum barrel length restrictions ) and unwittingly commit a felony by virtue of the way you held it .
That guidance directly contradicted a 2014 ATF letter that said just the opposite .
In 2017 , new guidance was issued which appears to sanction the shouldering of a braced pistol so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , sporadic , or situational ’ — whatever that means .
In 2018 , at President Trump ’ s direction , the ATF created rules banning the possession of bump stocks , devices which use a gun ’ s recoil to facilitate rapid operation of the trigger .
As Reason ’ s Jacob Sullum noted , the ATF ’ s regulatory move made “ owners of ‘ bump-stock-type devices ’ …felons , subject to a maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison and a $ 250,000 fine.
” The bump stock ban @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ATF ’ s lawless policymaking .
Nonetheless , the ban was met with little outcry or appreciation of its implications .
But , as you can see from the other cases detailed here , the ATF ’ s ban on bump stocks was not an aberration : it was just one of countless regulatory changes , before and since , that have turned lawful gun owners into criminals by executive fiat .
The ATF is not a lawmaking body—or , at least , it is not supposed to be .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passed by Congress .
The ATF is not empowered to create policy of its own accord , and it ’ s certainly not empowered to turn law-abiding citizens into criminals , but that ’ s exactly what it has been doing .
Sadly , there ’ s no hyperbole in the observation that millions of legal gun owners must wonder : Will I wake up tomorrow to find that I ’ ve been declared a felon ?
The rule of law is a fundamental value of a free society .
We are not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only by laws that are consistent with the Constitution and created according to its provisions .
The purpose of government is to protect us from arbitrary and illegitimate force , and to secure our rights—not to be the agent of their destruction .
The ATF itself has come to embody the exercise of arbitrary and illegitimate power .
Such a perversion of government ’ s purpose must be condemned in the strongest possible terms .
No matter how much our opinions about gun control laws diverge , we should be united in rejecting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You see , if President Donald Trump meant what he said about cutting the fat and bringing back law and order , he would be eliminating the unconstitutional ATF and reversing the bump stock ban and going after every governor in the US instituting red flag laws , pretended laws that his Justice Department is bribing the states to institute , but he isn ’ t .
Are your eyes opening yet , people ?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

I told you that when the Trump Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) unlawfully redefined machine gun to do away with a bump stocks in an ex post facto manner, which is also unconstitutional, that it would be the stepping stone to advance on the rights of the people further. Many gave excuses due to their political idol being in the White House. Well, now it isn’t so funny and I’ve been proven right about what I said. Now, the unconstitutional ATF is seeking to reinterpret the definition of “firearm.”
The Foundation for Economic Education reports:
What if government agents could, by declaration, make you into a criminal? What if, without legislative change, bureaucrats could decide that what was legal yesterday is a felony today? What if we were governed not by law, but by arbitrary statements telling us what we may or may not do?
Unfortunately, those questions are not merely hypothetical—thanks to recent abuses of power by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), millions of American gun owners are facing them head-on. Even if you hate guns, you should be deeply concerned by the arbitrary power wielded by the ATF against your fellow Americans. If an unchecked executive agency can run roughshod over any of our rights with impunity, all of our rights are in danger.
Felons by Fiat
Recently, the firearms manufacturer Q, LLC shared disturbing news with its customers: the ATF had declared the delightfully-named and popular “Honey Badger” pistol to be a “short-barreled rifle” (SBR). This determination subjects the firearm to special restrictions under the National Firearms Act (NFA). As a consequence of the ATF’s decision, customers who had purchased the Honey Badger have suddenly found themselves in felonious possession of a now-illegal firearm that they had legally acquired and legally owned.
The ATF’s determination is arbitrary. It is inconsistent with both federal law and prior ATF statements. Substantially similar firearms continue to be sold legally, as they have been for years. Instead of explaining what makes the Honey Badger different from those firearms, the ATF vaguely alluded to “objective design features,” offering no further explanation as to what those features are or why they lead the ATF to determine that the Honey Badger is an SBR.
This is far from the first time that the ATF has issued a declaration that turns innocent people into criminals — other examples abound. As I explained in Felony by Fiat:
In 2015, the ATF decided that the physical action of holding a pistol equipped with an ATF-approved brace to one’s shoulder was equivalent to creating an illegal short-barreled firearm. That is to say, you could pick up your perfectly legal pistol (which is not otherwise subject to the NFA’s minimum barrel length restrictions) and unwittingly commit a felony by virtue of the way you held it. That guidance directly contradicted a 2014 ATF letter that said just the opposite. In 2017, new guidance was issued which appears to sanction the shouldering of a braced pistol so long as such use is ‘incidental, sporadic, or situational’ — whatever that means.
And:
Just last year, the ATF issued new measurement guidelines that transformed some conventionally legal pistols into presumptively illegal firearms under the NFA’s ‘any other weapon’ (AOW) classification, depending on how those pistols had been configured and accessorized.
In 2018, at President Trump’s direction, the ATF created rules banning the possession of bump stocks, devices which use a gun’s recoil to facilitate rapid operation of the trigger.
As Reason’s Jacob Sullum noted, the ATF’s regulatory move made “owners of ‘bump-stock-type devices’…felons, subject to a maximum penalty of 10 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine.”
The bump stock ban was more prominent than other instances of the ATF’s lawless policymaking. Nonetheless, the ban was met with little outcry or appreciation of its implications.
But, as you can see from the other cases detailed here, the ATF’s ban on bump stocks was not an aberration: it was just one of countless regulatory changes, before and since, that have turned lawful gun owners into criminals by executive fiat.
Executive Agencies in a Free Society
The ATF is not a lawmaking body—or, at least, it is not supposed to be. It is an executive agency tasked with enforcing laws passed by Congress.
The ATF is not empowered to create policy of its own accord, and it’s certainly not empowered to turn law-abiding citizens into criminals, but that’s exactly what it has been doing. Sadly, there’s no hyperbole in the observation that millions of legal gun owners must wonder: Will I wake up tomorrow to find that I’ve been declared a felon?
The rule of law is a fundamental value of a free society. We are not to be governed by edict, but only by laws that are consistent with the Constitution and created according to its provisions. The purpose of government is to protect us from arbitrary and illegitimate force, and to secure our rights—not to be the agent of their destruction.
The ATF itself has come to embody the exercise of arbitrary and illegitimate power. Such a perversion of government’s purpose must be condemned in the strongest possible terms. No matter how much our opinions about gun control laws diverge, we should be united in rejecting executive agencies’ usurpations of sovereignty.
You see, if President Donald Trump meant what he said about cutting the fat and bringing back law and order, he would be eliminating the unconstitutional ATF and reversing the bump stock ban and going after every governor in the US instituting red flag laws, pretended laws that his Justice Department is bribing the states to institute, but he isn’t.
Are your eyes opening yet, people?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-17--Tyrant Fauci: “Now Is The Time To Do What You’re Told”

Dr. Anthony Fauci , the medical tyrant , is trying to force people to comply with his authoritarian psychotic rules to stop the alleged rise in cases of COVID-19 .
Fauci said that “ now is the time to do what you ’ re told.
” If there was ever a way to get free people to push back , it ’ s to use rhetoric such as that .
Fauci can pound sand .
And he ’ s upset that he ’ s been accurately labeled a dictator and authoritarian denying the truth .
But he added that Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authorities ( like himself ) , according to a report by Fox News .
Senator Rand Paul said on Thursday that Fauci is demanding your submission to him .
“ He believes that submission and lockdowns are fine , he ’ s not too worried about individual liberties , ” Paul told Fox News ’ Martha McCallum before adding that lockdowns and mask mandates are the equivalents to living in an “ authoritarian ” society .
It ’ s perhaps worse , however .
It ’ s a slave state .
Where some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violence and punishments to get others to comply .
He also said that he believes people are unwilling to listen to what scientists have recommended because of the “ divisive ” state of the country — a belief backed by a Pew Research report that found Democrats are more likely that Republicans to believe the coronavirus is threat to public health .
“ All of a sudden science gets caught in a lot of this divisiveness , ” he said .
–Fox News Fauci believes that if people wore their ritualistic shame muzzles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maintaining sanitary measures like washing or disinfecting their hands , this virus will be able to stay in check and he ’ d allow the country to remain open .
It ’ s long past time we take matters into our own hands and keep it open ourselves .
Fauci can not close everything down unless we , the people , submit and allow it to happen .
Wake up and put morality above legality .
Get Ready !
MSM Predictive Programming Calls This The “ Calm Before The Storm ” Many states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going into various stages of lockdown once again .
Those that aren ’ t in some stage of lockdown already will be pushed that way in the coming weeks .
As we ’ ve said before , if the ruling class believes they can get away with putting everyone on house arrest so they can conceal and cement their plans for world domination , they will do so .
And once again , it ’ s up to us to stand up and say : “ No .
We will not comply .
@

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the medical tyrant, is trying to force people to comply with his authoritarian psychotic rules to stop the alleged rise in cases of COVID-19. Fauci said that “now is the time to do what you’re told.”
If there was ever a way to get free people to push back, it’s to use rhetoric such as that. Fauci can pound sand. And he’s upset that he’s been accurately labeled a dictator and authoritarian denying the truth. But he added that Americans should listen to and obey the health authorities (like himself), according to a report by Fox News.
Senator Rand Paul said on Thursday that Fauci is demanding your submission to him. “He believes that submission and lockdowns are fine, he’s not too worried about individual liberties,” Paul told Fox News’ Martha McCallum before adding that lockdowns and mask mandates are the equivalents to living in an “authoritarian” society. It’s perhaps worse, however. It’s a slave state. Where some people issue commands and use force and violence and punishments to get others to comply.
He also said that he believes people are unwilling to listen to what scientists have recommended because of the “divisive” state of the country — a belief backed by a Pew Research report that found Democrats are more likely that Republicans to believe the coronavirus is threat to public health. “All of a sudden science gets caught in a lot of this divisiveness,” he said. –Fox News
Fauci believes that if people wore their ritualistic shame muzzles and listened to social distancing advisories while maintaining sanitary measures like washing or disinfecting their hands, this virus will be able to stay in check and he’d allow the country to remain open.
It’s long past time we take matters into our own hands and keep it open ourselves. Fauci cannot close everything down unless we, the people, submit and allow it to happen. Wake up and put morality above legality.
Get Ready! MSM Predictive Programming Calls This The “Calm Before The Storm”
Many states and counties or cities within states are going into various stages of lockdown once again. Those that aren’t in some stage of lockdown already will be pushed that way in the coming weeks. As we’ve said before, if the ruling class believes they can get away with putting everyone on house arrest so they can conceal and cement their plans for world domination, they will do so.
And once again, it’s up to us to stand up and say: “No. We will not comply.”
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-17--Moderna Stock Soars After Announcing COVID Vaccine Is 95% Effective

Editor ’ s Note : I ’ ll just remind you , you have better chances taking on COVID itself than the chances provided with this vaccine , and if you don ’ t believe me , you really need to listen to my interview with Dr. Carrie Madej on the issue of vaccines .
Moderna has announced that their COVID-19 vaccine is 95 % effective , and word of that caused their stock to skyrocket .
This news comes just one week after Pfizer and BioNTech said their shot was more than 90 percent effective .
Pfizer has already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an emergency use authorization .
The results from the Phase 3 study also indicated Moderna ’ s vaccine can help ward off “ severe cases of the virus ” , a key development as the United States allegedly grapples with a record-setting surge in infections and hospitalizations .
This is the mainstream media ’ s mass panic-induced “ third wave ” that they have been fear-mongering over .
The goal appears to be to panic people into takin this concocted injection and lockdown to make sure small businesses go under .
The so-called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first clinical validation that our vaccine can prevent COVID-19 disease , including severe disease , ” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a statement , calling the results a “ pivotal moment ” in the vaccine ’ s development .
Whether that ’ s true or not is up for debate .
We are being asked to take the mainstream media and Big Pharma ’ s word for it .
Not surprisingly though , the announcement sent Moderna ’ s stock price soaring more than 12 percent in premarket trading to $ 100.33 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t about money or control though… just ask the media .
Massachusetts-based Moderna said it will ask the US Food and Drug Administration for emergency approval of the shot “ in the coming weeks ” after it collects more data on the vaccine ’ s efficacy and safety .
Pfizer has similarly said it could seek an emergency use authorization by the end of the month .
Moderna released the results after an independent safety board examined data from 95 participants in the 30,000-person study who contracted COVID-19 .
Just five of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the vaccine before catching the virus , while the other 90 had gotten a placebo , the company said .
Eleven of those sick participants developed severe cases of coronavirus , but none had received the vaccine , a sign that the shot is effective at preventing serious infections , according to the company .
–The New York Post But only 5 got the vaccine…5 .
This is a serious facepalm moment , and people really need to start understanding what ’ s being said here .
This is not proof of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effective rate .
The lies are coming at us so fast now , it ’ s almost impossible to keep up .
Stay alert and prepared .
More is coming .
We need to brace ourselves .

Editor’s Note: I’ll just remind you, you have better chances taking on COVID itself than the chances provided with this vaccine, and if you don’t believe me, you really need to listen to my interview with Dr. Carrie Madej on the issue of vaccines.
Moderna has announced that their COVID-19 vaccine is 95% effective, and word of that caused their stock to skyrocket. This news comes just one week after Pfizer and BioNTech said their shot was more than 90 percent effective.
Pfizer has already begun mass production of its vaccine anticipating an emergency use authorization. The results from the Phase 3 study also indicated Moderna’s vaccine can help ward off “severe cases of the virus”, a key development as the United States allegedly grapples with a record-setting surge in infections and hospitalizations. This is the mainstream media’s mass panic-induced “third wave” that they have been fear-mongering over. The goal appears to be to panic people into takin this concocted injection and lockdown to make sure small businesses go under.
The so-called interim analysis “has given us the first clinical validation that our vaccine can prevent COVID-19 disease, including severe disease,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a statement, calling the results a “pivotal moment” in the vaccine’s development.
Whether that’s true or not is up for debate. We are being asked to take the mainstream media and Big Pharma’s word for it. Not surprisingly though, the announcement sent Moderna’s stock price soaring more than 12 percent in premarket trading to $100.33 as of 7:19 a.m. It isn’t about money or control though… just ask the media.
Massachusetts-based Moderna said it will ask the US Food and Drug Administration for emergency approval of the shot “in the coming weeks” after it collects more data on the vaccine’s efficacy and safety. Pfizer has similarly said it could seek an emergency use authorization by the end of the month. Moderna released the results after an independent safety board examined data from 95 participants in the 30,000-person study who contracted COVID-19. Just five of those 95 patients had received both doses of the vaccine before catching the virus, while the other 90 had gotten a placebo, the company said. Eleven of those sick participants developed severe cases of coronavirus, but none had received the vaccine, a sign that the shot is effective at preventing serious infections, according to the company. –The New York Post
But only 5 got the vaccine…5. This is a serious facepalm moment, and people really need to start understanding what’s being said here. This is not proof of anything, let alone a 95% effective rate. The lies are coming at us so fast now, it’s almost impossible to keep up.
Stay alert and prepared. More is coming. We need to brace ourselves.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-18--The Framers Outsmarted the Election Coup

It is a deliberate false narrative that the Speaker of the House would be appointed as acting president if the popular votes are not all counted by Jan. 20 , 2021 .
This narrative is derived from a false conflating of the Twentieth and Twenty Fifth Amendments .
The fact checkers ought to be telling Americans that by law , there is no way a delay in counting the popular vote can create a delay in electing the president and no way Nancy Pelosi can legally be appointed as “ acting ” president until a popular vote count dispute is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Twenty Fifth Amendment ’ s “ line of succession ” ignores the language that indicates that the line of succession applies to vacancies in the presidency from the president ’ s death , disability , resignation or removal from office ; it does not apply to a delay in counting popular votes nor from a normal expiration of a term of office .
The first thing that an honest fact checker would point out is that no president has ever been elected in November as a result of a popular vote count @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US presidents are elected on January 6 ( unless this date is changed prior to January 6 by passing of law ) , when the Senate President counts the electoral votes , not the popular vote ( 3 U.S.C .
§15 ) .
Popular vote is not used to directly elect a President , therefore having an accurate and complete popular vote count is not a factor in delaying the January election .
The next thing your fact checker would have to tell you is that the deadline for counting elector votes is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not legally permissible .
On the contrary , federal laws were established to avoid a repetition of the extraordinary delay incident to the electoral vote controversy surrounding the 1876 presidential election .
Here is how it works according to the Constitution and according to the law : After the electors have voted in each state , they make and sign six certificates , seal those certificates , and certify that these are all of the votes for President and Vice President .
Those certificates are then sent to the President of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their State .
Should there be delays or failures of state electors to submit electoral votes to Congress , there is no need to wonder , create , or invent a procedure .
There is an established precedent that guides us .
Federal law establishes that if no certificates of votes or lists have been received by the President of the Senate or the Archivist from electors by the fourth Wednesday in December , then the President of the Senate is directed by law to request the State ’ s Secretary of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 U.S.C .
§§12,13 ) .
The States whose electoral votes are missing are sent a collection notice from the Senate President warning that their electoral votes are due immediately .
The process , along with specific deadlines for counting electoral votes submitted and disregarding electoral votes not submitted , is well established by historical precedent , federal law , and the Constitution .
Every fact checker should know the date for counting the electoral votes is fixed by law as January 6 following each presidential election unless the date is changed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The votes that are submitted in compliance with the deadline are counted .
The Votes that are not submitted in compliance with the deadline are not counted .
The Twelfth Amendment requires only a simple majority of electoral votes to elect a President .
Precedent establishes what happens if some electors ’ votes are not received in compliance with the deadline and are not counted .
For example , in 1865 only two of the three Nevada electors cast their electoral votes and only two Nevada votes were counted and included in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to elect the president .
Similar instances of votes “ not given ” by electors that were not included in the “ whole number ” of electors reported , occurred in 1809 , 1813 , and 1817 .
Additionally , pursuant to congressional act , a State ’ s elector ’ s certificate of vote can be rejected if both Houses of Congress vote to accept the objection .
This means the votes from the electors in question are not counted .
In 1873 both Houses decided not to count the electoral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1864 , all of the votes from Louisiana and Tennessee were rejected , and in 1872 , all of the votes from Arkansas and Louisiana plus three of the eleven electoral votes from Georgia were rejected .
The drafters of our Constitution were concerned that a delay in counting the vote could result in a quiet , non-violent political coup by one party or one or more states , where one or more disgruntled States would hold the entire election hostage .
The framers of the Constitution even warned that the President of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should never be given the powers of the presidency because they are elected members of one political party and are therefore partisan .
Representatives Morris and Madison warned that in order to pass their party ’ s political agenda those in power in the Congress could affect a political coup by indefinitely delaying the legitimate election of a president .
The system they established for electing the president is clearly established through the Constitution , Amendments , historical precedent , and Congressional law to prevent any delay and prevent that sort of political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ member of Congress should already know and what the talking heads in the media don ’ t know or are deliberately falsifying to create uncertainty , destroy trust in our elections and foment chaos aimed at the overthrow of our Constitutional government .
These facts can not be denied .
Know these facts .
Demand they be followed .
Expect them to be followed .
KrisAnne Hall is a constitutional attorney and former prosecutor .
Read full article at krisannehall.com .

It is a deliberate false narrative that the Speaker of the House would be appointed as acting president if the popular votes are not all counted by Jan. 20, 2021. This narrative is derived from a false conflating of the Twentieth and Twenty Fifth Amendments. The fact checkers ought to be telling Americans that by law, there is no way a delay in counting the popular vote can create a delay in electing the president and no way Nancy Pelosi can legally be appointed as “acting” president until a popular vote count dispute is resolved.
The false narrative that invokes the Twenty Fifth Amendment’s “line of succession” ignores the language that indicates that the line of succession applies to vacancies in the presidency from the president’s death, disability, resignation or removal from office; it does not apply to a delay in counting popular votes nor from a normal expiration of a term of office.
The first thing that an honest fact checker would point out is that no president has ever been elected in November as a result of a popular vote count. As a matter of law, US presidents are elected on January 6 (unless this date is changed prior to January 6 by passing of law), when the Senate President counts the electoral votes, not the popular vote (3 U.S.C. §15). Popular vote is not used to directly elect a President, therefore having an accurate and complete popular vote count is not a factor in delaying the January election.
The next thing your fact checker would have to tell you is that the deadline for counting elector votes is set by law, therefore a delay is not legally permissible. On the contrary, federal laws were established to avoid a repetition of the extraordinary delay incident to the electoral vote controversy surrounding the 1876 presidential election.
Here is how it works according to the Constitution and according to the law: After the electors have voted in each state, they make and sign six certificates, seal those certificates, and certify that these are all of the votes for President and Vice President. Those certificates are then sent to the President of the Senate, and the Secretary of State of their State.
Should there be delays or failures of state electors to submit electoral votes to Congress, there is no need to wonder, create, or invent a procedure. There is an established precedent that guides us.
Federal law establishes that if no certificates of votes or lists have been received by the President of the Senate or the Archivist from electors by the fourth Wednesday in December, then the President of the Senate is directed by law to request the State’s Secretary of State to immediately forward the certificates (3 U.S.C. §§12,13). The States whose electoral votes are missing are sent a collection notice from the Senate President warning that their electoral votes are due immediately. The process, along with specific deadlines for counting electoral votes submitted and disregarding electoral votes not submitted, is well established by historical precedent, federal law, and the Constitution.
Every fact checker should know the date for counting the electoral votes is fixed by law as January 6 following each presidential election unless the date is changed by law (3 U.S.C. §15). The votes that are submitted in compliance with the deadline are counted. The Votes that are not submitted in compliance with the deadline are not counted.
The Twelfth Amendment requires only a simple majority of electoral votes to elect a President. Precedent establishes what happens if some electors’ votes are not received in compliance with the deadline and are not counted. For example, in 1865 only two of the three Nevada electors cast their electoral votes and only two Nevada votes were counted and included in the “whole number of electoral votes” to elect the president. Similar instances of votes “not given” by electors that were not included in the “whole number” of electors reported, occurred in 1809, 1813, and 1817.
Additionally, pursuant to congressional act, a State’s elector’s certificate of vote can be rejected if both Houses of Congress vote to accept the objection. This means the votes from the electors in question are not counted. In 1873 both Houses decided not to count the electoral votes from Arkansas and Louisiana. In 1864, all of the votes from Louisiana and Tennessee were rejected, and in 1872, all of the votes from Arkansas and Louisiana plus three of the eleven electoral votes from Georgia were rejected.
The drafters of our Constitution were concerned that a delay in counting the vote could result in a quiet, non-violent political coup by one party or one or more states, where one or more disgruntled States would hold the entire election hostage.
The framers of the Constitution even warned that the President of the Senate or Speaker of the House should never be given the powers of the presidency because they are elected members of one political party and are therefore partisan. Representatives Morris and Madison warned that in order to pass their party’s political agenda those in power in the Congress could affect a political coup by indefinitely delaying the legitimate election of a president.
The system they established for electing the president is clearly established through the Constitution, Amendments, historical precedent, and Congressional law to prevent any delay and prevent that sort of political coup.
Now you know what your member of Congress should already know and what the talking heads in the media don’t know or are deliberately falsifying to create uncertainty, destroy trust in our elections and foment chaos aimed at the overthrow of our Constitutional government.
These facts cannot be denied. Know these facts. Demand they be followed. Expect them to be followed.
KrisAnne Hall is a constitutional attorney and former prosecutor. Read full article at krisannehall.com.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-18--Detroit Dominion IT Worker Describes Exactly How Poll Workers Inflated Biden Vote Tallies (Video)

The fraud is so systemic , so institutionalized , it must have been going on since Joe Kennedy and Sam Giancana stole the election for JFK .
They ’ ve perfected it .
Well almost .
Detroit Dominion IT worker describes exactly how poll workers inflated Biden vote tallies ( Video ) Carone was sent to Detroit , Michigan , to provide technical support for the ballot counting process .
While she was there she noted poll workers repeatedly double scanning ballots to generate multiple votes from the same batch of ballot sheets .
Ms. Carone also witnessed election workers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as well as the unloading of vans in an area of the Detroit election tabulation facility she was not permitted to inspect .
More details in this lawsuit… That has now changed .
In video testimony , Detroit IT worker Melissa Carone , who was employed by Dominion Voting Systems as a contractor to keep an eye on ballot-counting machines , says she witnessed poll workers at the TCF Center repeatedly run the same batches of 50 ballots through counters sometimes up to eight , nine , 10 times .
What ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she was not allowed to touch ballots or stand directly over machines , she said only saw ballots marked for Biden during her entire 24-hour shift – not a single ballot for President Trump .
She also testified that there was no legitimate , legal oversight of the balloting process – that Democrats were essentially ‘ watching ’ Democrats .
She also says she saw poll workers duplicating ballots while changing the votes on others , stealing results in the open .
Carone also said she reported her findings to the FBI , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no indication that the bureau – or the Justice Department – has done a thing to investigate .
Her revelations come amid others by Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell , who says she and other legal eagles working on behalf of the president have discovered substantial evidence of alleged payoffs , vote alterations , and other shenanigans related to Dominion and certain state elected officials whom she did not name .
But she also appeared on Fox Business Network with Lou Dobbs , and that interview is here : And here ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if – widespread , open vote fraud against this president were going to take place , it makes perfect sense that it would be carried out in Democratic strongholds like Detroit , where there is a corrupt machine already in place .

The fraud is so systemic, so institutionalized, it must have been going on since Joe Kennedy and Sam Giancana stole the election for JFK. They’ve perfected it. Well almost.
Detroit Dominion IT worker describes exactly how poll workers inflated Biden vote tallies (Video)
Source: The Gateway Pundit, Citizen Free Press, November 15, 2020:
Carone was sent to Detroit, Michigan, to provide technical support for the ballot counting process. While she was there she noted poll workers repeatedly double scanning ballots to generate multiple votes from the same batch of ballot sheets. Ms. Carone also witnessed election workers filling out ballots, fraudulently signing ballots, as well as the unloading of vans in an area of the Detroit election tabulation facility she was not permitted to inspect.
More details in this lawsuit…
That has now changed.
In video testimony, Detroit IT worker Melissa Carone, who was employed by Dominion Voting Systems as a contractor to keep an eye on ballot-counting machines, says she witnessed poll workers at the TCF Center repeatedly run the same batches of 50 ballots through counters sometimes up to eight, nine, 10 times.
What’s more, she said that while she was not allowed to touch ballots or stand directly over machines, she said only saw ballots marked for Biden during her entire 24-hour shift – not a single ballot for President Trump.
She also testified that there was no legitimate, legal oversight of the balloting process – that Democrats were essentially ‘watching’ Democrats. She also says she saw poll workers duplicating ballots while changing the votes on others, stealing results in the open.
Carone also said she reported her findings to the FBI, but at this point, there is no indication that the bureau – or the Justice Department – has done a thing to investigate.
Her revelations come amid others by Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell, who says she and other legal eagles working on behalf of the president have discovered substantial evidence of alleged payoffs, vote alterations, and other shenanigans related to Dominion and certain state elected officials whom she did not name.
Carnone’s testimony is here:
https://twitter.com/Wordofbeak/status/1326621044531204101?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
But she also appeared on Fox Business Network with Lou Dobbs, and that interview is here:
And here’s some food for thought: If – if – widespread, open vote fraud against this president were going to take place, it makes perfect sense that it would be carried out in Democratic strongholds like Detroit, where there is a corrupt machine already in place.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-18--Imprecatory Prayers: Loving Our Enemies Doesn’t Come At The Expense Of Appealing For Divine Justice!

To imprecate means “ to invoke evil upon or curse ” one ’ s enemies .
David prayed such prayers in the Psalms .
Jesus invoked the Psalms .
Paul also cursed those with another gospel , and the Saints cry out for God to avenge their blood .
But should Christians incorporate imprecatory prayers today in light of Jesus commanding we love our enemies ?
My guest , Dr. John Diamond , joins me in this episode to discuss this important and timely topic .
The consistent witness of Scripture affirms the legitimacy of God ’ s people making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , family , and corporate prayers .
Underlying this assertion is a basic assumption that the prayers of God ’ s people should be rooted in all of Scripture .
The Psalter is God ’ s divinely inspired prayer book and hymnal .
It gives us the language of petition and praise .
The imprecatory psalms help give shape to the hurt and outrage that the people of God at times experience in a world desecrated by sin .
Some react to the harsh language of the imprecatory psalms .
While this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sight of what our sin deserves .
Others underscore the teaching of Jesus to love our enemies .
But loving our enemies in the New Testament never comes at the expense of forgoing appeals to divine justice .
Praying for God to punish the wicked is neither unloving nor vindictive but is an expression of faith in Him who judges justly ( 1 Peter 2:23 ) .
Still others want to limit the imprecatory psalms to old covenant Israel .
While the circumstances of God ’ s covenant people have changed with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that plagued Israel as a believing people in a hostile world still haunt the church today .
If we remove the vocabulary of the imprecatory psalms from our homes and churches , what else will Christians sing and pray when tragedy strikes ?
To pray the imprecatory psalms is ultimately to pray as Jesus taught us to pray .
As Christians , we long for God ’ s kingdom to come .
We yearn for His will to be done on earth as it is in heaven .
Praying the imprecatory psalms is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call to faith .
We lift our voices , not our swords , as we pray for God either to convert or curse the enemies of Christ and His kingdom .
–Dr .
John W. Tweeddale I can not forbear the following little incident that occurred the other morning at family worship .
I happened to be reading one of the imprecatory psalms , and as I paused to remark , my little boy , a lad of ten years , asked with some earnestness : “ Father , do you think it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the destruction of his enemies like that ?
” and at the same time referred me to Christ as praying for his enemies .
I paused a moment to know how to shape the reply so as to fully meet and satisfy his enquiry , and then said , “ My son , If an assassin should enter the house by night , and murder your mother , and then escape , and the sheriff and citizens were all out in pursuit , trying to catch him , would you not pray @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrest him , and that he might be brought to justice ?
” “ Oh , yes !
” said he , “ but I never saw it so before .
I did not know that that was the meaning of these psalms.
” “ Yes , ” said I , “ my son , the men against whom David prays were bloody men , men of falsehood and crime , enemies to the peace of society , seeking his own life , and unless they were arrested and their wicked devices defeated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The explanation perfectly satisfied his mind .
[ as found in War Psalms of the Prince of Peace : Lessons From the Imprecatory Psalms , 90 ; James E. Adams ] King David , the psalmist most associated with imprecatory verses such as Psalm 55:15 , 69:28 , and 109:8 , often used phrases like , “ may their path be dark and slippery , with the angel of the LORD pursuing them ” ( Psalm 35:6 ) and “ O God , break the teeth in their mouths ; tear out the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LORD !
” ( Psalm 58:6 ) .
Psalms 7 , 35 , 55 , 58 , 59 , 69 , 109 , and 139 were written by David to ask God to bring judgment upon his enemies .
( The other two imprecatory psalms , 79 and 137 , were written by Asaph and an unknown psalmist . )
These prayers were written not so much to exact revenge upon one ’ s enemies , but rather to emphasize God ’ s abhorrence of evil , His sovereignty over all mankind , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
Many of these prayers were prophetic and could be seen taking place later in the New Testament in actual historical events .

To imprecate means “to invoke evil upon or curse” one’s enemies. David prayed such prayers in the Psalms. Jesus invoked the Psalms. Paul also cursed those with another gospel, and the Saints cry out for God to avenge their blood. But should Christians incorporate imprecatory prayers today in light of Jesus commanding we love our enemies? My guest, Dr. John Diamond, joins me in this episode to discuss this important and timely topic.
The consistent witness of Scripture affirms the legitimacy of God’s people making use of imprecatory prayers in their individual, family, and corporate prayers. Underlying this assertion is a basic assumption that the prayers of God’s people should be rooted in all of Scripture. The Psalter is God’s divinely inspired prayer book and hymnal. It gives us the language of petition and praise. The imprecatory psalms help give shape to the hurt and outrage that the people of God at times experience in a world desecrated by sin.
Some react to the harsh language of the imprecatory psalms. While this is understandable, we mustn’t lose sight of what our sin deserves. Others underscore the teaching of Jesus to love our enemies. But loving our enemies in the New Testament never comes at the expense of forgoing appeals to divine justice. Praying for God to punish the wicked is neither unloving nor vindictive but is an expression of faith in Him who judges justly (1 Peter 2:23). Still others want to limit the imprecatory psalms to old covenant Israel. While the circumstances of God’s covenant people have changed with the advent of Christ, the same cruelties that plagued Israel as a believing people in a hostile world still haunt the church today. If we remove the vocabulary of the imprecatory psalms from our homes and churches, what else will Christians sing and pray when tragedy strikes?
To pray the imprecatory psalms is ultimately to pray as Jesus taught us to pray. As Christians, we long for God’s kingdom to come. We yearn for His will to be done on earth as it is in heaven. Praying the imprecatory psalms is not a call to arms but a call to faith. We lift our voices, not our swords, as we pray for God either to convert or curse the enemies of Christ and His kingdom. –Dr. John W. Tweeddale
I cannot forbear the following little incident that occurred the other morning at family worship. I happened to be reading one of the imprecatory psalms, and as I paused to remark, my little boy, a lad of ten years, asked with some earnestness: “Father, do you think it right for a good man to pray for the destruction of his enemies like that?” and at the same time referred me to Christ as praying for his enemies. I paused a moment to know how to shape the reply so as to fully meet and satisfy his enquiry, and then said, “My son, If an assassin should enter the house by night, and murder your mother, and then escape, and the sheriff and citizens were all out in pursuit, trying to catch him, would you not pray to God that they might succeed and arrest him, and that he might be brought to justice?” “Oh, yes!” said he, “but I never saw it so before. I did not know that that was the meaning of these psalms.” “Yes,” said I, “my son, the men against whom David prays were bloody men, men of falsehood and crime, enemies to the peace of society, seeking his own life, and unless they were arrested and their wicked devices defeated, many innocent persons must suffer.” The explanation perfectly satisfied his mind. [as found in War Psalms of the Prince of Peace: Lessons From the Imprecatory Psalms , 90; James E. Adams]
King David, the psalmist most associated with imprecatory verses such as Psalm 55:15, 69:28, and 109:8, often used phrases like, “may their path be dark and slippery, with the angel of the LORD pursuing them” (Psalm 35:6) and “O God, break the teeth in their mouths; tear out the fangs of the young lions, O LORD!” (Psalm 58:6).
Psalms 7, 35, 55, 58, 59, 69, 109, and 139 were written by David to ask God to bring judgment upon his enemies. (The other two imprecatory psalms, 79 and 137, were written by Asaph and an unknown psalmist.) These prayers were written not so much to exact revenge upon one’s enemies, but rather to emphasize God’s abhorrence of evil, His sovereignty over all mankind, and His divine protection of His chosen people. Many of these prayers were prophetic and could be seen taking place later in the New Testament in actual historical events.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-18--Bill Will “Legalize” Vaccination Of 11-Year-Olds Without Parents’ Consent

Editor ’ s Note : This is exactly why people need to oppose such measures .
First , these are your kids , not government ’ s .
Second , the term “ legal ” is often used to cover up that which is unlawful in order to pass it by the masses as though it were lawful .
This bill is actually criminal and so are all those that support it .
Parents , you better stand up now , or they will not only turn your kids against you , but they will be coming for you next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On Tuesday , the 17th of November , the District of Columbia will finalize a bill that would flout existing Supreme Court precedent and greatly diminish parental rights regarding a minor ’ s healthcare .
The Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act ( Bill 23-171 ) will allow children as young as 11 to consent on their own in regard to receiving vaccinations .
Their parents will not be informed .
The bill will declare , “ A minor , eleven years of age or older , may consent to receive a vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the informed consent standard , and the vaccine is recommended by the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) … ” To meet the “ informed consent standard , ” the bill says the minor must be “ able to comprehend the needs for , the nature of , and any significant risks ordinarily inherent in the medical care.
” However , the bill does not establish exactly who would determine if the child is able to comprehend these factors , nor does it state that the child will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are not risk free .
Supreme Court precedent has been clearly established and has held for decades that parents have both the duty and the right to direct the care , custody , and control of their minor children .
This bill is in direct conflict with said Supreme Court precedent and contrary to the U.S. Constitution .
In fact , in its 1979 Parham v. J.R. decision , the Supreme Court declared that the state can not make these decisions : The state taking parental rights away and allowing impressionable children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a terrifying notion .
Nevertheless , the bill passed the previous votes with only a single dissenting voice from Council member Trayon White Sr. ( D-Ward 8 ) .
“ Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing , education and care of their children , ” White said , going on to claim that vaccines , which are generally safe , do pose a potential risk to children ’ s health .
White cited the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to argue that vaccines are not entirely safe .
Though the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ignore the vaccine companies ’ own warnings on the inserts of every drug , the fact remains that in just 13 years , thousands of settlements have been awarded , totaling over $ 4.2 billion in payouts .
“ Medical professionals and schools should not be permitted to coerce impressionable minors into procedures capable of causing injury or death behind their parents ’ back , ” White said .
“ There have been comments about the Centers for Disease Control having [ approved ] these said vaccinations .
For me , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ s an issue of the council voting to circumvent the inclusion of a parent making a decision about their child.
” But this bill gets worse .
Not only does it remove the right of the parent to make the judgment for their child , but it also establishes a methodology to keep it secret from them while still charging their insurance .
The bill specifies that insurance providers shall seek reimbursement from the insurer without parental consent , so they “ shall not send an Explanation of Benefits ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bill .
What ’ s more , the bill essentially requires the falsification of the child ’ s medical records regarding vaccinations by requiring the health care provider administering the vaccines to “ leave the immunization record in Part 3 blank , and…submit the immunization record directly to the minor ’ s school.
” The records would then be kept at the school and the parents would not have access .
Here at the Free Thought Project , we are not “ anti-vaxxers ” but rather advocate for informed consent and vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face of both of these .
It will go for a vote on November 17 and will most likely be approved .
If this blatant attack on parental rights isn ’ t called out in D.C. , rest assured it will spread to other states and this slippery slope could remove parental rights entirely , handing over parental duties to the state — a terrifying thought indeed .

Editor’s Note: This is exactly why people need to oppose such measures. First, these are your kids, not government’s. Second, the term “legal” is often used to cover up that which is unlawful in order to pass it by the masses as though it were lawful. This bill is actually criminal and so are all those that support it. Parents, you better stand up now, or they will not only turn your kids against you, but they will be coming for you next under the guise of “legal.”
On Tuesday, the 17th of November, the District of Columbia will finalize a bill that would flout existing Supreme Court precedent and greatly diminish parental rights regarding a minor’s healthcare. The Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act (Bill 23-171) will allow children as young as 11 to consent on their own in regard to receiving vaccinations. Their parents will not be informed.
The bill will declare, “A minor, eleven years of age or older, may consent to receive a vaccine where the minor is capable of meeting the informed consent standard, and the vaccine is recommended by the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)…”
To meet the “informed consent standard,” the bill says the minor must be “able to comprehend the needs for, the nature of, and any significant risks ordinarily inherent in the medical care.”
However, the bill does not establish exactly who would determine if the child is able to comprehend these factors, nor does it state that the child will be told that vaccines, though generally safe, are not risk free.
Supreme Court precedent has been clearly established and has held for decades that parents have both the duty and the right to direct the care, custody, and control of their minor children. This bill is in direct conflict with said Supreme Court precedent and contrary to the U.S. Constitution.
In fact, in its 1979 Parham v. J.R. decision, the Supreme Court declared that the state cannot make these decisions:
“Simply because the decision of a parent is not agreeable to a child, or because it involves risks, does not automatically transfer the power to make that decision from the parents to some agency or officer of the state. The same characterizations can be made for a tonsillectomy, appendectomy, or other medical procedure. Most children, even in adolescence, simply are not able to make sound judgments concerning many decisions, including their need for medical care or treatment. Parents can and must make those judgments.”
The state taking parental rights away and allowing impressionable children to be guided by government motives is a terrifying notion. Nevertheless, the bill passed the previous votes with only a single dissenting voice from Council member Trayon White Sr. (D-Ward 8).
“Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing, education and care of their children,” White said, going on to claim that vaccines, which are generally safe, do pose a potential risk to children’s health. White cited the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to argue that vaccines are not entirely safe.
Though the NVIC program is downplayed by those who ignore the vaccine companies’ own warnings on the inserts of every drug, the fact remains that in just 13 years, thousands of settlements have been awarded, totaling over $4.2 billion in payouts.
“Medical professionals and schools should not be permitted to coerce impressionable minors into procedures capable of causing injury or death behind their parents’ back,” White said. “There have been comments about the Centers for Disease Control having [approved] these said vaccinations. For me, it’s not an issue of the vaccination. It’s an issue of the council voting to circumvent the inclusion of a parent making a decision about their child.”
We agree.
But this bill gets worse. Not only does it remove the right of the parent to make the judgment for their child, but it also establishes a methodology to keep it secret from them while still charging their insurance.
The bill specifies that insurance providers shall seek reimbursement from the insurer without parental consent, so they “shall not send an Explanation of Benefits (EOB) for services provided” under the bill.
What’s more, the bill essentially requires the falsification of the child’s medical records regarding vaccinations by requiring the health care provider administering the vaccines to “leave the immunization record in Part 3 blank, and…submit the immunization record directly to the minor’s school.” The records would then be kept at the school and the parents would not have access.
“The school shall keep this immunization record confidential, except it may share the record with the Department of Health or the school-based health center.”
Here at the Free Thought Project, we are not “anti-vaxxers” but rather advocate for informed consent and vaccine safety. This bill flies in the face of both of these. It will go for a vote on November 17 and will most likely be approved.
If this blatant attack on parental rights isn’t called out in D.C., rest assured it will spread to other states and this slippery slope could remove parental rights entirely, handing over parental duties to the state — a terrifying thought indeed.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-18--Tyrant Fauci: “Now Is The Time To Do What You’re Told”


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-18--CIA-Controlled Mainstream Media Propagandists Focus Totally On Another Unlawful Lockdown

All of the focus of mainstream media right now is on how the United States “ needs ” another lockdown .
While people plan to gather with family in less than a week to celebrate Thanksgiving , the ruling class and their elitist puppet masters are coming up with ways to ruin it using mainstream media to propagate the ideas .
The threat of total economic terrorism is upon us .
Many states have already locked down again and banned Thanksgiving gatherings of more than a few people .
This is not about health .
If this was about health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impoverishing people by shutting down their businesses and forcing them out of work .
Poverty is a contributor to poor health .
The past few months have been an American experiment with Covid-19 : Can the country keep bars , restaurants , gyms , and other businesses open while fighting the virus with milder measures , including some social distancing and widespread masking ?
Six months after spring shutdowns ended , the answer is clear : The milder approach isn ’ t working .
With the milder measures failing us , it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To avert possibly hundreds of thousands of deaths in the months before a vaccine becomes widely available , the US needs to close down once again .
That means temporarily shuttering in-person , indoor services at nonessential businesses , particularly bars and restaurants ; restricting larger gatherings , including in private homes ; and encouraging , or outright mandating , people to stay home as much as possible — only going out for food , work , exercise , health care , and other basics needs — and limit their social interactions to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solution ?
According to mainstream media and the ruling class and the elitists , we need a hardcore permanent lockdown .
We should submit to our own enslavement , fasten the chains around our necks , and let them lead us around like cattle .
Like Fauci said : your job is to obey your master .
Our COVID Police State Wants To Take Thanksgiving And Christmas Away From You Too This is tyranny .
It ’ s not coming .
It ’ s here .
Trump hasn ’ t stopped it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it ’ s nonetheless here .
If we can not open our eyes we are in for the dark winter we ’ ve been repeatedly promised by the political psychopaths who demand you comply .
If you think it won ’ t happen again , you couldn ’ t be more wrong .
We have said from the beginning that if these control freaks even think for a moment that they can get away with destroying more live with another lockdown , they will do it .
Why ?
The more desperate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ’ ll just take the vaccine , do what you ’ re told , be tracked and traced , and get your pittance of universal basic income in the form of a digital dollar .
All of their agendas are coming together right now and mainstream media is the public relations department for the ruling class and their elitist masters .
The one thing they fear is you .
They fear you waking up to the realization that you don ’ t need ANYONE ’ S permission to be free .

All of the focus of mainstream media right now is on how the United States “needs” another lockdown. While people plan to gather with family in less than a week to celebrate Thanksgiving, the ruling class and their elitist puppet masters are coming up with ways to ruin it using mainstream media to propagate the ideas.
As Vox wrote:
The US is losing the fight against Covid-19. The only way to win quickly is closing down.
The threat of total economic terrorism is upon us. Many states have already locked down again and banned Thanksgiving gatherings of more than a few people. This is not about health. If this was about health, the government would not be intentionally impoverishing people by shutting down their businesses and forcing them out of work. Poverty is a contributor to poor health.
The past few months have been an American experiment with Covid-19: Can the country keep bars, restaurants, gyms, and other businesses open while fighting the virus with milder measures, including some social distancing and widespread masking? Six months after spring shutdowns ended, the answer is clear: The milder approach isn’t working. With the milder measures failing us, it’s clear what needs to happen: To avert possibly hundreds of thousands of deaths in the months before a vaccine becomes widely available, the US needs to close down once again. That means temporarily shuttering in-person, indoor services at nonessential businesses, particularly bars and restaurants; restricting larger gatherings, including in private homes; and encouraging, or outright mandating, people to stay home as much as possible — only going out for food, work, exercise, health care, and other basics needs — and limit their social interactions to their own households.–Vox
What’s the solution? According to mainstream media and the ruling class and the elitists, we need a hardcore permanent lockdown. We should submit to our own enslavement, fasten the chains around our necks, and let them lead us around like cattle. Like Fauci said: your job is to obey your master.
Our COVID Police State Wants To Take Thanksgiving And Christmas Away From You Too
This is tyranny. It’s not coming. It’s here. Trump hasn’t stopped it. Maybe he slowed it down some, but it’s nonetheless here. If we cannot open our eyes we are in for the dark winter we’ve been repeatedly promised by the political psychopaths who demand you comply. If you think it won’t happen again, you couldn’t be more wrong. We have said from the beginning that if these control freaks even think for a moment that they can get away with destroying more live with another lockdown, they will do it. Why? The more desperate you are financial, the more easily you’ll just take the vaccine, do what you’re told, be tracked and traced, and get your pittance of universal basic income in the form of a digital dollar.
Greg Mannarino: “They Want People Desperate. People Aren’t Desperate Enough”
All of their agendas are coming together right now and mainstream media is the public relations department for the ruling class and their elitist masters. The one thing they fear is you. They fear you waking up to the realization that you don’t need ANYONE’S permission to be free.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo