thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-02--More Propaganda?  Trump & Melania Test Positive For COVID

I must say that the timing on this is incredible , just before the election , Trump just told us he wears a mask .
Don ’ t forget , he and Melania were wearing masks outside of the Supreme Court building while Ruth Bade Ginsberg laid in state .
He was also taking hydroxychloroquine and zinc , which all the news was a ghast over and pushing the narrative , but he tested positive .
Well , friends , let ’ s consider that most of those tests are well over 80 % false positives .
Let ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 8 !
Who doesn ’ t have COVID , according to the tests ?
The mainstream media is having a blast with president Donald Trump ’ s admission that he tested positive for the coronavirus .
The media is jumping on this because Trump has “ downplayed ” the severity of the virus and refused to issue a nationwide mask mandate upsetting those who want totalitarian control over others .
The president ’ s result came after he spent months playing down the severity of the outbreak that has killed more than 207,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States and hours after insisting that “ the end of the pandemic is in sight , ” reported the New York Times .
The White House physician assured everyone that the president and first lady , who also tested positive , are both feeling fine .
“ The president and first lady are both well at this time , and they plan to remain at home within the White House during their convalescence , ” Dr. Sean P. Conley , the White House physician , said in a statement , adding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president to continue carrying out his duties without disruption while recovering , and I will keep you updated on any future developments.
” The New York Times also blasted Trump for refusing to wear a mask : Trump seems fine , yet the media is talking about how he ’ s in the “ high risk ” category .
While Trump has been reported to have high cholesterol and tips the scale at 243 pounds , which is considered obese for his height , Dr. Conley , his physician , pronounced Mr. Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year after his last full medical checkup .
In all likelihood , the media is blowing this completely out of proportion .
But you never know , it could be much worse than that This could also be a false flag .
We live in the strangest of times and it ’ s hard to tell if this is not another psyop or something else much worse .
Stay alert and focused .
This issue definitely is something that needs to be watched .
The telltale signs of this being another psychological operation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CBS Healthwatch Reporter : In The Political Battle Over A COVID Vaccine , Your Health Is Of No Concern • Providing the Data Of The Coronavirus Hoax In The UK Will Get A Doctor Suspended • UK Doctor Speaks Out On “ COVID Nazification Of The National Health Service ” • COVID-19 : Inside The Hospitals & Why The Lockdown ?
I don ’ t know it any other way to say but this is pure propaganda .
Don ’ t believe a word of Trump and his wife having COVID .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we ’ ve documented before .
This is merely getting us set for the final show before they seek to implement the New World Order with mask off , no pun intended .

I must say that the timing on this is incredible, just before the election, Trump just told us he wears a mask. Don’t forget, he and Melania were wearing masks outside of the Supreme Court building while Ruth Bade Ginsberg laid in state. He was also taking hydroxychloroquine and zinc, which all the news was a ghast over and pushing the narrative, but he tested positive.
Well, friends, let’s consider that most of those tests are well over 80% false positives.
Let’s also consider that COVID contains human genome 8!
Who doesn’t have COVID, according to the tests?
Our friend Mac Slavo writes:
The mainstream media is having a blast with president Donald Trump’s admission that he tested positive for the coronavirus. The media is jumping on this because Trump has “downplayed” the severity of the virus and refused to issue a nationwide mask mandate upsetting those who want totalitarian control over others.
The president’s result came after he spent months playing down the severity of the outbreak that has killed more than 207,000 (based on inaccurate tests) in the United States and hours after insisting that “the end of the pandemic is in sight,” reported the New York Times.
The White House physician assured everyone that the president and first lady, who also tested positive, are both feeling fine. “The president and first lady are both well at this time, and they plan to remain at home within the White House during their convalescence,” Dr. Sean P. Conley, the White House physician, said in a statement, adding: “Rest assured I expect the president to continue carrying out his duties without disruption while recovering, and I will keep you updated on any future developments.”
The New York Times also blasted Trump for refusing to wear a mask:
For months, Mr. Trump has refused to wear a mask in public on all but a few occasions and has repeatedly questioned their effectiveness. And as recently as Tuesday, at their opening debate, he mocked Mr. Biden for wearing one. “I don’t wear masks like him,” the president said, his voice dripping with derision. “Every time you see him, he’s got a mask.”
Trump seems fine, yet the media is talking about how he’s in the “high risk” category. While Trump has been reported to have high cholesterol and tips the scale at 243 pounds, which is considered obese for his height, Dr. Conley, his physician, pronounced Mr. Trump in “very good health” last year after his last full medical checkup.
In all likelihood, the media is blowing this completely out of proportion. But you never know, it could be much worse than that This could also be a false flag. We live in the strangest of times and it’s hard to tell if this is not another psyop or something else much worse. Stay alert and focused. This issue definitely is something that needs to be watched. The telltale signs of this being another psychological operation are all over this.
I don’t know it any other way to say but this is pure propaganda. Don’t believe a word of Trump and his wife having COVID. It’s not even been isolated as we’ve documented before. This is merely getting us set for the final show before they seek to implement the New World Order with mask off, no pun intended.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-02--Arizona:  Innocent Mom Hospitalized After Being “Legally” Raped By Cops Looking For Non-Existent Dru

Arizona:  Innocent Mom Hospitalized After Being “Legally” Raped By Cops Looking For Non-Existent Drugs

Phoenix , AZ — Rape in the United States is defined by the Department of Justice as “ Penetration , no matter how slight , of the vagina or anus with any body part or object , or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person , without the consent of the victim.
” At the end of the following story about what happened to Erica Reynolds , you will have zero doubt that she was raped .
However , because her rapists wear a badge and claim to protect society , no one will be going to jail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was legal .
Erica ’ s nightmare started the day after Christmas in 2018 when police suspected her of having a substance deemed illegal by the state .
Because the state claims the immoral authority to kidnap , cage — and , in Erica ’ s case , rape — people in search of these substances , this innocent mother was kidnapped and brought down to the Phoenix police department .
As police searched for the arbitrary substance , Erica was stripped naked , forced into a concrete room — and raped .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Arizona Republic , about how the rape unfolded .
Erica was in the room with a male officer and a female officer .
When she noticed the female officer begin to put on rubber gloves , Erica went into panic mode and began begging the officers not to do what they were about to do .
They did not listen , even when she demanded they stop .
“ I said , ‘ You can ’ t do this to me , ’ ” she says .
“ He said , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ” Without putting any lubrication on the glove , Erica was forced to bend over as the female cop rammed her dry fingers into Erica ’ s anus .
Having given birth just a few months earlier , Erica was suffering from hemorrhoids which were prodded and torn during the search for non-existent drugs .
Erica screamed out in agony , but the callous state-sanctioned rapists couldn ’ t have cared less .
After anally raping the innocent mother , the female cop — without changing gloves — proceeded to vaginally rape @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Erica was sent on her way .
She went home vomiting and was in so much pain that she had to go to the hospital to be treated .
Her injuries were so bad that hospital staff called police to report a sexual assault .
Clearly understanding that what she just experienced was an act of rape , Erica filed a complaint .
But no one would even listen to her , much less be held accountable because , as mentioned above , it ’ s not called rape when cops are searching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — it ’ s called policy , even when they violate it .
As the Arizona Republic reports , under Phoenix Police Department policy , body cavity searches require a warrant or the “ consent of the suspect ” to prevent unconstitutional searches .
The policy also mandates that only a medical doctor may perform them , and any strip search must take place in “ private rooms with due regard for the subject ’ s dignity.
” None of this happened in Erica ’ s case .
Erica says that the department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Even after hospital staff reported the sexual assault injuries , police still had the nerve to call what they did to Erica a “ routine cavity search.
” Now , top brass within the Phoenix police department are simply chocking up Erica ’ s treatment as a lapse in policy that allows officers to “ hide ” their use of “ out of policy ” tactics that injure people .
Sgt .
Mercedes Fortune , a Phoenix police spokeswoman , said , “ In Mrs. Reynolds ’ case , are there moments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not captured and it wasn ’ t recorded ?
There were .
If you are that type of cop , that probably won ’ t be the first time you do something wrong , so we hope the second time we catch you.
” Neither of the cops involved in Erica ’ s case were fired , even after they were found to have violated department policy , so the idea of catching them a second time is absurd as they were allowed to knowingly get away with it the first time .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ just one week of suspension as punishment , not for raping the woman , but for violating policy when she did it .
Earlier this year , because the officers involved were not held accountable in any meaningful way , the taxpayers shelled out $ 1.6 million to Erica .
Sadly , Erica ’ s case is one of countless other cases on which TFTP has reported over the years .
Even innocent great-grandmothers aren ’ t safe from the badge wearing rapists in their immoral pursuit of illegal substances .
And all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ condoned by most of society because they have been taught from childhood that the state can do no harm , and locking people in cages and raping them over substances — keeps us safe .
In order to get past this downright sickening behavior , we have to ask ourselves what would society think about people — if they didn ’ t wear a uniform and a badge — who did this to a woman .
Would anyone in their right mind claim that nothing criminal happened if the perpetrators weren ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the rest of the world in general realize that just because something is “ legal ” does not make it moral .
If we do not realize that legality does not equal morality , it is inevitable that we will completely implode as a species .

Phoenix, AZ — Rape in the United States is defined by the Department of Justice as “Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” At the end of the following story about what happened to Erica Reynolds, you will have zero doubt that she was raped. However, because her rapists wear a badge and claim to protect society, no one will be going to jail and the rapists claim everything they did was legal.
Erica’s nightmare started the day after Christmas in 2018 when police suspected her of having a substance deemed illegal by the state. Because the state claims the immoral authority to kidnap, cage — and, in Erica’s case, rape — people in search of these substances, this innocent mother was kidnapped and brought down to the Phoenix police department.
As police searched for the arbitrary substance, Erica was stripped naked, forced into a concrete room — and raped.
She recalled, in horrifying detail, to the Arizona Republic, about how the rape unfolded. Erica was in the room with a male officer and a female officer. When she noticed the female officer begin to put on rubber gloves, Erica went into panic mode and began begging the officers not to do what they were about to do. They did not listen, even when she demanded they stop.
“I said, ‘You can’t do this to me,’” she says. “He said, ‘We can. And we will.’”
Without putting any lubrication on the glove, Erica was forced to bend over as the female cop rammed her dry fingers into Erica’s anus. Having given birth just a few months earlier, Erica was suffering from hemorrhoids which were prodded and torn during the search for non-existent drugs. Erica screamed out in agony, but the callous state-sanctioned rapists couldn’t have cared less.
After anally raping the innocent mother, the female cop — without changing gloves — proceeded to vaginally rape Erica. After finding nothing again, Erica was sent on her way. She went home vomiting and was in so much pain that she had to go to the hospital to be treated. Her injuries were so bad that hospital staff called police to report a sexual assault.
Clearly understanding that what she just experienced was an act of rape, Erica filed a complaint. But no one would even listen to her, much less be held accountable because, as mentioned above, it’s not called rape when cops are searching for substances deemed illegal by the state — it’s called policy, even when they violate it.
As the Arizona Republic reports, under Phoenix Police Department policy, body cavity searches require a warrant or the “consent of the suspect” to prevent unconstitutional searches. The policy also mandates that only a medical doctor may perform them, and any strip search must take place in “private rooms with due regard for the subject’s dignity.”
None of this happened in Erica’s case. Erica says that the department circled the wagons and covered it up. Even after hospital staff reported the sexual assault injuries, police still had the nerve to call what they did to Erica a “routine cavity search.”
Now, top brass within the Phoenix police department are simply chocking up Erica’s treatment as a lapse in policy that allows officers to “hide” their use of “out of policy” tactics that injure people.
Sgt. Mercedes Fortune, a Phoenix police spokeswoman, said, “In Mrs. Reynolds’ case, are there moments when things happened and it’s not captured and it wasn’t recorded? There were. If you are that type of cop, that probably won’t be the first time you do something wrong, so we hope the second time we catch you.”
Neither of the cops involved in Erica’s case were fired, even after they were found to have violated department policy, so the idea of catching them a second time is absurd as they were allowed to knowingly get away with it the first time. Last year, the female cop received just one week of suspension as punishment, not for raping the woman, but for violating policy when she did it.
Earlier this year, because the officers involved were not held accountable in any meaningful way, the taxpayers shelled out $1.6 million to Erica.
Sadly, Erica’s case is one of countless other cases on which TFTP has reported over the years. Even innocent great-grandmothers aren’t safe from the badge wearing rapists in their immoral pursuit of illegal substances. And all of it is allowed to continue and condoned by most of society because they have been taught from childhood that the state can do no harm, and locking people in cages and raping them over substances — keeps us safe.
In order to get past this downright sickening behavior, we have to ask ourselves what would society think about people — if they didn’t wear a uniform and a badge — who did this to a woman. Would anyone in their right mind claim that nothing criminal happened if the perpetrators weren’t cops?
It is high time Americans and the rest of the world in general realize that just because something is “legal” does not make it moral. If we do not realize that legality does not equal morality, it is inevitable that we will completely implode as a species.
“When misguided public opinion honors what is despicable and despises what is honorable, punishes virtue and rewards vice, encourages what is harmful and discourages what is useful, applauds falsehood and smothers truth under indifference or insult, a nation turns it’s back on progress and can be restored only by the terrible lessons of catastrophe.”
― Frédéric Bastiat, Economic Harmonies
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-02--College Police Label Sharing Christian Faith As ‘Disorderly Conduct,’ Block Student From Distributin

College Police Label Sharing Christian Faith As ‘Disorderly Conduct,’ Block Student From Distributing Religious Literature in Free Speech Zone

WASHINGTON , D.C. —The Rutherford Institute has weighed in before the U.S. Supreme Court on a case in which campus police , citing “ disorderly conduct , ” prevented a college student from speaking about his Christian faith and distributing religious literature from a small free speech zone on a 260-acre campus .
In an amicus brief filed in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski , Rutherford Institute attorneys are asking the Supreme Court to hold officials at Georgia Gwinnett College liable for violating college student Chike Uzuegbunam ’ s free speech rights and ensure that campus policies adhere to the First Amendment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foley & Lardner , LLP , in Washington , DC , assisted The Rutherford Institute in advancing the arguments in the Uzuegbunam brief .
“ This case reminds us that there is no room for trust in the relationship between the citizenry and the government , ” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead , president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America : The War on the American People .
“ Trust the government to police itself , and it will sidestep the law at every turn .
The only way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law and respect the rights of the citizenry , as Thomas Jefferson recognized , is to bind them with ‘ the chains of the Constitution.
’ ” Chike Uzuegbunam is a Christian and was a student at Georgia Gwinnett College , which has a 260-acre campus in Lawrenceville , Ga. Chike ’ s faith requires that he share his religious beliefs with others .
He sought to do so in 2016 by passing out literature and speaking to students from a spacious concrete plaza near the college ’ s library .
A campus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chike could not distribute written materials there because he was not in one of two “ speech zones ” the college had established .
Under the college ’ s policies , students were required to reserve times for one of the two “ speech zones , ” which consisted of one patio and one sidewalk that amounted to 0.0015 % of total area of the campus .
The policies also required students apply for a reservation at least three days in advance and gave college officials unbridled discretion to decide who could speak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what materials they could give out .
Although Chike properly reserved a time for sharing his faith from one of the zones , he was again stopped from speaking by a campus security officer .
The officer told him that because someone had complained about his speech , he was engaged in “ disorderly conduct ” under college policies .
Chike then brought a lawsuit against the college alleging that its policies and their application to prevent him from engaging in religious speech violated the First Amendment .
After months of litigation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as moot because it had changed its “ speech zone ” policies and the trial court granted the motion .
Chike appealed , arguing his case was not moot because he was entitled to nominal damages for the interference with his First Amendment rights , but the appeals court upheld the dismissal .
Chike sought and was granted review by the U.S. Supreme Court .
In its amicus brief supporting Chike , The Rutherford Institute argues that dismissal of the lawsuit violates long-established court precedent affirming the right of citizens to obtain an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officials when they violate a person ’ s constitutional rights .
The Rutherford Institute , a nonprofit civil liberties organization , defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated and educates the public about threats to their freedoms .
The amicus brief in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

WASHINGTON, D.C. —The Rutherford Institute has weighed in before the U.S. Supreme Court on a case in which campus police, citing “disorderly conduct,” prevented a college student from speaking about his Christian faith and distributing religious literature from a small free speech zone on a 260-acre campus. In an amicus brief filed in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, Rutherford Institute attorneys are asking the Supreme Court to hold officials at Georgia Gwinnett College liable for violating college student Chike Uzuegbunam’s free speech rights and ensure that campus policies adhere to the First Amendment.
Affiliate attorney Michael J. Lockerby of Foley & Lardner, LLP, in Washington, DC, assisted The Rutherford Institute in advancing the arguments in the Uzuegbunam brief.
“This case reminds us that there is no room for trust in the relationship between the citizenry and the government,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People . “Trust the government to police itself, and it will sidestep the law at every turn. The only way to ensure that government officials obey the law and respect the rights of the citizenry, as Thomas Jefferson recognized, is to bind them with ‘the chains of the Constitution.’”
Chike Uzuegbunam is a Christian and was a student at Georgia Gwinnett College, which has a 260-acre campus in Lawrenceville, Ga. Chike’s faith requires that he share his religious beliefs with others.
He sought to do so in 2016 by passing out literature and speaking to students from a spacious concrete plaza near the college’s library.
A campus security officer stopped him and warned that Chike could not distribute written materials there because he was not in one of two “speech zones” the college had established.
Under the college’s policies, students were required to reserve times for one of the two “speech zones,” which consisted of one patio and one sidewalk that amounted to 0.0015% of total area of the campus.
The policies also required students apply for a reservation at least three days in advance and gave college officials unbridled discretion to decide who could speak, when they could speak, and what materials they could give out.
Although Chike properly reserved a time for sharing his faith from one of the zones, he was again stopped from speaking by a campus security officer.
The officer told him that because someone had complained about his speech, he was engaged in “disorderly conduct” under college policies.
Chike then brought a lawsuit against the college alleging that its policies and their application to prevent him from engaging in religious speech violated the First Amendment.
After months of litigation, the college moved to dismiss the case as moot because it had changed its “speech zone” policies and the trial court granted the motion.
Chike appealed, arguing his case was not moot because he was entitled to nominal damages for the interference with his First Amendment rights, but the appeals court upheld the dismissal.
Chike sought and was granted review by the U.S. Supreme Court. In its amicus brief supporting Chike, The Rutherford Institute argues that dismissal of the lawsuit violates long-established court precedent affirming the right of citizens to obtain an award of nominal damages against the government officials when they violate a person’s constitutional rights.
The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties organization, defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated and educates the public about threats to their freedoms.
The amicus brief in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
Article posted with permission from John Whitehead


Puppet for President

Barack Hussein Obama was mocked as the teleprompter-in-chief for his heavy reliance on the text flowing across the glass screens to deliver everything from long speeches to brief remarks .
The teleprompter was an omnipresent reminder that Obama was neither natural nor authentic .
He was not a gifted speaker , but a heavily rehearsed one whose speeches were the work of a committee , oral , written , and technical , that did everything but deliver the speech for him .
When Trump rose to the top of the field it was in no small part because , unlike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural .
When he reads a speech from a teleprompter , it ’ s obvious .
And it ’ s those speeches in which he is the least connected to his supporters .
The Obama speeches that made Planned Parenthood supporters swoon in the aisles were teleprompter speeches .
The Trump speeches that packed stadiums were wholly natural .
But at least there was no doubt that Obama was consciously and willingly delivering speeches .
When Joe Biden left the White House , he got custody of the teleprompter .
But who got @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign trail is not a Biden skill .
The first time he ran for president , he got caught ripping off a speech by British Labour leader Neil Kinnock .
On the campaign trail , he had challenged a reporter to compare IQs , and more recently , called a voter “ fat ” and challenged him to a push-up contest .
During the debates , his replies end early after running out of steam .
So it made sense for the Obama team to tether Biden to a teleprompter .
But Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overreached even his old teleprompter-in-chief ’ s glass addiction .
The media and its myriad fact checkers , which no longer fact check the media , but just pump out its political spin , have rushed to deny that Biden was using a teleprompter during his Telemundo interview .
That ’ s the same issue that Biden ’ s campaign press secretary had ducked in a FOX News appearance , but which the Democrat network is now denying on Biden ’ s behalf .
Except this sort of thing keeps happening and it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There ’ s the time that teleprompter text was reflected on a photo frame that Biden was holding up , and the time he appeared to be asking his staff to adjust a teleprompter , and when he read obvious instructions like “ topline message is ” and “ end of quote ” on separate occasions .
There ’ s no context in which saying gibberish like that is meant to be a response .
Not even by Biden ’ s low standards of stringing together random cliches in random word order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impenetrable as anything produced by a random word generator .
But the problem isn ’ t really the teleprompter .
It ’ s what the teleprompter reveals about Biden .
Obama ’ s teleprompter addiction showed that he wasn ’ t a natural or authentic speaker , but that he was an insecure control freak who distrusted the people he was pretending to connect to .
There ’ s nothing wrong with speakers occasionally using a teleprompter .
Good speakers use them the way they use notes .
Bad speakers use them to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliver a 45 minute speech , it ’ s not going to be done entirely from a blank slate .
I ’ m going to have text that I can glance at if I need to .
But reading a speech is very different than delivering it .
When you deliver a speech , you ’ re connecting with the audience , but when you read a speech , you ’ re engaging in an artificial exercise that shuts out the audience .
Even when it ’ s a good speech and even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is very practiced at making a read speech feel like a natural delivery , reading a speech has a distancing effect .
Obama used a teleprompter because he didn ’ t like or trust the audience , and believed that they would reject him unless he tightly controlled every element of his speech while feigning a connection .
That same approach marked his campaigning , rehearsed gestures , fake warmth , and hugs , that reverted to coldness and distance once he was away from the crowds .
That ’ s the opposite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with audiences and trusts them to go along with whatever he ’ s saying .
That ’ s what made his stadium speeches compelling while baffling political insiders who didn ’ t understand their appeal .
When Trump uses a teleprompter , the connection fades because there ’ s no longer the same level of dynamic interplay between the audience and the speaker .
What does the teleprompter reveal about Joe Biden ?
Biden doesn ’ t use a teleprompter because he hates and fears people the way his old boss did .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he survived because he likes audiences and crowds .
Of all the things that Biden has been accused of , being an introvert like Obama , wasn ’ t on the list .
He isn ’ t using a teleprompter because he can ’ t handle public speaking , but because he can ’ t handle speaking coherently , while understanding and remembering what he ’ s meant to be saying .
That might be a question of mental capacity , if elected , he would be the oldest sitting president in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relevantly be a question of power and control .
Did Biden ask for a teleprompter for even the most minor appearance where the softball questions are guaranteed , like a remote chat with unfunny uber-leftist Stephen Colbert , or is it that the old Obama team that has gathered around him wants to keep him on a glass leash ?
The Obama White House was notorious for trying to control Biden and older Cabinet members .
Not only did Obama go through defense secretaries like Bill Clinton went through foreign donors , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State John Kerry were assigned minders to keep them from going off message and to quickly correct the message when they did .
Obama never forgave Biden for stealing his thunder by coming out for gay marriage first .
The teleprompter is arguably as much about compensating for Biden ’ s erratic messaging as his mental capacity .
Biden has gone back and forth on a national mask mandate and on fracking , among other hot button issues , and his own political instincts were always terrible .
Keeping a candidate who confuses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million Americans died of the virus , tied to a teleprompter controls the messaging and the candidate .
And that raises the question of whom voters are really choosing : Biden or the Obama team ?
Either Biden can ’ t get through a simple interview without a teleprompter or he can ’ t be trusted to get through an interview without a teleprompter by the Obama vets keeping him on a leash .
It ’ s hard to say which one is worse , but easy to say which one violates the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a candidate to public office to serve them .
They ’ re not voting for humbug puppets manipulated by the wizards behind the curtain .
A candidate who can ’ t do an interview without a teleprompter is either physically or politically incapacitated , and is unfit for public office .
Obama ’ s teleprompters were manifestations of his need to control his environment , but Biden ’ s teleprompters are manifestations of his lack of control over himself .
Either Biden can ’ t get through a simple conversation on his own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to handle it on his own .
Elder abuse is often manifested by inappropriate levels of control , by an older person being denied the ability to make his decisions , being humiliated and berated for mistakes , and then being even more closely monitored and controlled by those who wield power over him .
The teleprompter may be the most tangible symbol of elder abuse by the Biden campaign .
A teleprompter telling a politician what to say and when to say it can be a symbol of power or control .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t seem like symbols of power , but of control .
One of the many problems with the Biden-Harris campaign , or as Biden has on occasion called it , the Harris-Biden campaign , is that the man at the top of the ticket isn ’ t really in charge of it .
After two Democrat nominees , Obama and Hillary , who exemplified obsessive control , Biden is being carried along to an election that he wants , but can ’ t remember why , by his handlers .
Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Unlike Obama or Hillary , he doesn ’ t represent anything except a senescent drive for power that has outlived his ability to wield it .
There are few Biden signs even here in some of the deepest and bluest parts of a deep blue state .
No one can say exactly what he stands for or why anyone should vote for him .
And even the polls that claim an inevitable Biden victory show little voter enthusiasm for the actual candidate .
After some unusual and unnatural candidacies , Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them all .
He ’ s on the ticket as a generic anti-Trump candidate , a puppet for the radical political interests of his old boss , and is being kept on a tight leash by those same political interests .
Biden ’ s only tangible promise is that voting for him will mean a third term for Obama .
Unlike so many lies that he ’ s told in his half century in politics , this one may be the terrible truth .

Barack Hussein Obama was mocked as the teleprompter-in-chief for his heavy reliance on the text flowing across the glass screens to deliver everything from long speeches to brief remarks.
The teleprompter was an omnipresent reminder that Obama was neither natural nor authentic. He was not a gifted speaker, but a heavily rehearsed one whose speeches were the work of a committee, oral, written, and technical, that did everything but deliver the speech for him.
When Trump rose to the top of the field it was in no small part because, unlike Obama, his speeches were authentic and natural. When he reads a speech from a teleprompter, it’s obvious. And it’s those speeches in which he is the least connected to his supporters.
The Obama speeches that made Planned Parenthood supporters swoon in the aisles were teleprompter speeches. The Trump speeches that packed stadiums were wholly natural.
But at least there was no doubt that Obama was consciously and willingly delivering speeches.
When Joe Biden left the White House, he got custody of the teleprompter. But who got custody of Biden?
Speaking on the campaign trail is not a Biden skill. The first time he ran for president, he got caught ripping off a speech by British Labour leader Neil Kinnock. On the campaign trail, he had challenged a reporter to compare IQs, and more recently, called a voter “fat” and challenged him to a push-up contest. During the debates, his replies end early after running out of steam.
So it made sense for the Obama team to tether Biden to a teleprompter. But Biden’s reliance on the teleprompter has overreached even his old teleprompter-in-chief’s glass addiction.
The media and its myriad fact checkers, which no longer fact check the media, but just pump out its political spin, have rushed to deny that Biden was using a teleprompter during his Telemundo interview. That’s the same issue that Biden’s campaign press secretary had ducked in a FOX News appearance, but which the Democrat network is now denying on Biden’s behalf.
Except this sort of thing keeps happening and it happens too often to be explained away.
There’s the time that teleprompter text was reflected on a photo frame that Biden was holding up, and the time he appeared to be asking his staff to adjust a teleprompter, and when he read obvious instructions like “topline message is” and “end of quote” on separate occasions.
There’s no context in which saying gibberish like that is meant to be a response.
Not even by Biden’s low standards of stringing together random cliches in random word order to form a word salad that is impenetrable as anything produced by a random word generator.
But the problem isn’t really the teleprompter. It’s what the teleprompter reveals about Biden.
Obama’s teleprompter addiction showed that he wasn’t a natural or authentic speaker, but that he was an insecure control freak who distrusted the people he was pretending to connect to.
There’s nothing wrong with speakers occasionally using a teleprompter. Good speakers use them the way they use notes. Bad speakers use them to recite the entire presentation.
When I deliver a 45 minute speech, it’s not going to be done entirely from a blank slate. I’m going to have text that I can glance at if I need to. But reading a speech is very different than delivering it. When you deliver a speech, you’re connecting with the audience, but when you read a speech, you’re engaging in an artificial exercise that shuts out the audience.
Even when it’s a good speech and even when the speaker, like Obama, is very practiced at making a read speech feel like a natural delivery, reading a speech has a distancing effect.
Obama used a teleprompter because he didn’t like or trust the audience, and believed that they would reject him unless he tightly controlled every element of his speech while feigning a connection. That same approach marked his campaigning, rehearsed gestures, fake warmth, and hugs, that reverted to coldness and distance once he was away from the crowds.
That’s the opposite of the Trump effect.
Trump connects with audiences and trusts them to go along with whatever he’s saying. That’s what made his stadium speeches compelling while baffling political insiders who didn’t understand their appeal. When Trump uses a teleprompter, the connection fades because there’s no longer the same level of dynamic interplay between the audience and the speaker.
What does the teleprompter reveal about Joe Biden?
Biden doesn’t use a teleprompter because he hates and fears people the way his old boss did. After nearly half a century of politics, he survived because he likes audiences and crowds. Of all the things that Biden has been accused of, being an introvert like Obama, wasn’t on the list.
He isn’t using a teleprompter because he can’t handle public speaking, but because he can’t handle speaking coherently, while understanding and remembering what he’s meant to be saying. That might be a question of mental capacity, if elected, he would be the oldest sitting president in history, but it might even more relevantly be a question of power and control.
Did Biden ask for a teleprompter for even the most minor appearance where the softball questions are guaranteed, like a remote chat with unfunny uber-leftist Stephen Colbert, or is it that the old Obama team that has gathered around him wants to keep him on a glass leash?
The Obama White House was notorious for trying to control Biden and older Cabinet members.
Not only did Obama go through defense secretaries like Bill Clinton went through foreign donors, but some Cabinet members, like Secretary of State John Kerry were assigned minders to keep them from going off message and to quickly correct the message when they did.
Obama never forgave Biden for stealing his thunder by coming out for gay marriage first.
The teleprompter is arguably as much about compensating for Biden’s erratic messaging as his mental capacity. Biden has gone back and forth on a national mask mandate and on fracking, among other hot button issues, and his own political instincts were always terrible. Keeping a candidate who confuses Iran and Iraq, and suggests 200 million Americans died of the virus, tied to a teleprompter controls the messaging and the candidate.
And that raises the question of whom voters are really choosing: Biden or the Obama team?
Either Biden can’t get through a simple interview without a teleprompter or he can’t be trusted to get through an interview without a teleprompter by the Obama vets keeping him on a leash.
It’s hard to say which one is worse, but easy to say which one violates the spirit of an election.
Voters elect a candidate to public office to serve them. They’re not voting for humbug puppets manipulated by the wizards behind the curtain. A candidate who can’t do an interview without a teleprompter is either physically or politically incapacitated, and is unfit for public office.
Obama’s teleprompters were manifestations of his need to control his environment, but Biden’s teleprompters are manifestations of his lack of control over himself. Either Biden can’t get through a simple conversation on his own or he can’t be trusted to handle it on his own.
Elder abuse is often manifested by inappropriate levels of control, by an older person being denied the ability to make his decisions, being humiliated and berated for mistakes, and then being even more closely monitored and controlled by those who wield power over him.
The teleprompter may be the most tangible symbol of elder abuse by the Biden campaign.
A teleprompter telling a politician what to say and when to say it can be a symbol of power or control. Unlike Obama, Biden’s teleprompters don’t seem like symbols of power, but of control.
One of the many problems with the Biden-Harris campaign, or as Biden has on occasion called it, the Harris-Biden campaign, is that the man at the top of the ticket isn’t really in charge of it. After two Democrat nominees, Obama and Hillary, who exemplified obsessive control, Biden is being carried along to an election that he wants, but can’t remember why, by his handlers.
Biden’s candidacy is weightless and meaningless. Unlike Obama or Hillary, he doesn’t represent anything except a senescent drive for power that has outlived his ability to wield it. There are few Biden signs even here in some of the deepest and bluest parts of a deep blue state. No one can say exactly what he stands for or why anyone should vote for him. And even the polls that claim an inevitable Biden victory show little voter enthusiasm for the actual candidate.
After some unusual and unnatural candidacies, Biden’s candidacy may be the most unnatural of them all. He’s on the ticket as a generic anti-Trump candidate, a puppet for the radical political interests of his old boss, and is being kept on a tight leash by those same political interests.
Biden’s only tangible promise is that voting for him will mean a third term for Obama. Unlike so many lies that he’s told in his half century in politics, this one may be the terrible truth.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-02--Nearly 600 Earthquakes Rattle Southern California As Speculation About “The Big One” Starts To Rise

Nearly 600 Earthquakes Rattle Southern California As Speculation About “The Big One” Starts To Rise Again

Nearly 600 Earthquakes Rattle Southern California As Speculation About “ The Big One ” Starts To Rise Again Over the last few days , a swarm of almost 600 earthquakes has shaken Southern California , and a lot of people are becoming extremely concerned about what will happen next .
In fact , if you go on Twitter right now you will find a tremendous amount of speculation that “ the Big One ” could be coming .
The experts are trying to calm the general public by assuring them that it is probably not likely that “ the Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t know for sure .
Forecasting earthquakes is not like forecasting the weather , and experts will continue to tell us that a major event is not likely until the day when one finally happens .
But what everyone can agree upon is that earthquake swarms cause the probability of a major event to rise .
Of course , that doesn ’ t mean that there will be a major event associated with this current earthquake swarm , and there may not be a major event if an earthquake swarm occurs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what is going on in southern California right now is worth watching .
According to the Los Angeles Times , this current swarm of quakes has been centered “ around the town of Westmoreland in Imperial County ” … Most of the rumbling has been relatively minor , but during a period of less than three hours on Wednesday , there were 45 earthquakes of at least magnitude 3.0… A magnitude 4.9 quake has been the largest event so far , and we shall see what else happens over the next several days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this earthquake swarm has occurred along some small faults “ that connect the San Andreas and Imperial faults ” … This is an area that has had some pretty serious earthquake swarms in the past .
In fact , the USGS is telling us that there were also large swarms in the area in 1981 and in 2012… Obviously , the swarms of 1981 and 2012 did not produce something much larger , and hopefully , this one will not either .
But the USGS is warning that there is a “ very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ magnitude 7.0 or above could potentially happen… However , as I noted above , the truth is that they don ’ t really know .
None of the experts has any way to reliably forecast earthquakes in advance , and someday when “ the Big One ” finally strikes there may not be any sort of advance warning at all .
But the experts do believe that it is inevitable that eventually “ the Big One ” will arrive , and one particularly alarming study concluded that the full length of the San @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at once ” … .
Could you imagine the utter devastation that such an event would cause ?
Scientists have discovered that enormous earthquakes in the distant past caused the ground to sink by as much as three feet in some portions of southern California , and some scientists have warned that if such an event happened today that “ it could plunge large parts of California into the sea almost instantly ” … If you have read my new book , you already understand why I keep relentlessly warning people about these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time for warning will be over and disaster will strike .
According to Cal State Fullerton professor Matt Kirby , a big enough quake could cause vast stretches of southern California to sink dramatically “ relatively instantaneously ” … Right now , most people living in California are not thinking about earthquakes because they are dealing with the worst wildfire season in the history of the state .
Millions of acres have already burned , and the skies have been filled with smoke for weeks on end .
For many residents , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are finally moving out of the state .
But of course , most Californians will just continue to stay where they are no matter what happens , and one day “ the Big One ” will turn all of their lives upside down in a single moment .

Over the last few days, a swarm of almost 600 earthquakes has shaken Southern California, and a lot of people are becoming extremely concerned about what will happen next. In fact, if you go on Twitter right now you will find a tremendous amount of speculation that “the Big One” could be coming. The experts are trying to calm the general public by assuring them that it is probably not likely that “the Big One” is imminent, but they don’t know for sure. Forecasting earthquakes is not like forecasting the weather, and experts will continue to tell us that a major event is not likely until the day when one finally happens.
But what everyone can agree upon is that earthquake swarms cause the probability of a major event to rise. Of course, that doesn’t mean that there will be a major event associated with this current earthquake swarm, and there may not be a major event if an earthquake swarm occurs next month. But without a doubt what is going on in southern California right now is worth watching.
According to the Los Angeles Times, this current swarm of quakes has been centered “around the town of Westmoreland in Imperial County”…
A swarm of hundreds of small earthquakes struck in and around the town of Westmoreland in Imperial County over the past couple days The Southern California Seismic Network recorded nearly 600 earthquakes, the smallest a magnitude 1.1, as of 6 a.m. Thursday, according to a report from the project by Caltech and the U.S. Geological Survey.
Most of the rumbling has been relatively minor, but during a period of less than three hours on Wednesday, there were 45 earthquakes of at least magnitude 3.0…
‘In just 2.5hr Westmorland swarm has had 45 quakes of M≥3.0. One of the largest swarms we have had in the Imperial Valley – and it is historically the most active swarms in SoCal,’ seismologist Dr Lucy Jones wrote on Twitter on Wednesday night.
A magnitude 4.9 quake has been the largest event so far, and we shall see what else happens over the next several days.
According to Dr. Lucy Jones, this earthquake swarm has occurred along some small faults “that connect the San Andreas and Imperial faults”…
None of the earthquakes that have been happening in the Imperial Valley are anywhere near the San Andreas fault. They are in the Brawley Seismic Zone – a network of small faults that connect the San Andreas and Imperial faults.
This is an area that has had some pretty serious earthquake swarms in the past.
In fact, the USGS is telling us that there were also large swarms in the area in 1981 and in 2012…
The quake swarms “are located in an area of diffuse seismic activity between the San Andreas fault in the north and the Imperial fault to the south,” the USGS says. Previous swarms in the area happened in 1981 and 2012. “Past swarms have remained active for 1 to 20 days, with an average duration of about a week,” the USGS reported.
Obviously, the swarms of 1981 and 2012 did not produce something much larger, and hopefully, this one will not either.
But the USGS is warning that there is a “very small probability” that a quake of magnitude 7.0 or above could potentially happen…
‘The ongoing swarm could trigger an earthquake significantly larger than the M4.9 that occurred on the 30 September (i.e., M7.0 and above),’ they warned. ‘While this is a very small probability, if such an earthquake were to occur, it would have serious impacts on communities nearby and would be followed by aftershocks that would increase the number of smaller earthquakes per day.’
However, as I noted above, the truth is that they don’t really know.
None of the experts has any way to reliably forecast earthquakes in advance, and someday when “the Big One” finally strikes there may not be any sort of advance warning at all.
But the experts do believe that it is inevitable that eventually “the Big One” will arrive, and one particularly alarming study concluded that the full length of the San Andreas fault could potentially “unzip all at once”….
For years, scientists believed the mighty San Andreas—the 800-mile-long fault running the length of California where the Pacific and North American plates meet—could only rupture in isolated sections. But a recent study by federal, state and academic researchers showed that much of the fault could unzip all at once, unleashing a rare, singular catastrophe. Now, insurers have used that research to come up with a new analysis of the damage that could be caused by statewide break of the San Andreas.
Could you imagine the utter devastation that such an event would cause?
Scientists have discovered that enormous earthquakes in the distant past caused the ground to sink by as much as three feet in some portions of southern California, and some scientists have warned that if such an event happened today that “it could plunge large parts of California into the sea almost instantly”…
The Big One may be overdue to hit California, but scientists near LA have found a new risk for the area during a major earthquake. They claim that if a major tremor hits the area, it could plunge large parts of California into the sea almost instantly.
If you have read my new book, you already understand why I keep relentlessly warning people about these things.
Unfortunately, one day the time for warning will be over and disaster will strike. According to Cal State Fullerton professor Matt Kirby, a big enough quake could cause vast stretches of southern California to sink dramatically “relatively instantaneously”…
‘It´s something that would happen relatively instantaneously,’ Kirby said. ‘Probably today if it happened, you would see seawater rushing in.’
Right now, most people living in California are not thinking about earthquakes because they are dealing with the worst wildfire season in the history of the state.
Millions of acres have already burned, and the skies have been filled with smoke for weeks on end.
For many residents, this has been the final straw and they are finally moving out of the state.
But of course, most Californians will just continue to stay where they are no matter what happens, and one day “the Big One” will turn all of their lives upside down in a single moment.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-02--Moderna:  COVID-19 Vaccine Will Not Be Ready Before The Election

Here ’ s a bit of good news : Moderna says its coronavirus vaccine being developed under Operation Warp Speed will not be available by the election .
Moderna ’ s vaccine won ’ t be available until 2021 .
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel told the Financial Times in an interview that Moderna , a Bi Pharma front-runner in the COVID-19 vaccine race , will not seek emergency-use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration until November 25 at the earliest and does not expect to have secured approval for distribution of the vaccine to the general public until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ late [ first quarter ] , early [ second quarter ] approval is a reasonable timeline , based on what we know from our vaccine , ” Bancel FDA Commissioner Is Willing To Skip Phase 3 Trials On COVID-19 Vaccine Despite Trump ’ s assertions that a vaccine could be ready in weeks , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield told Congress earlier this month that widespread vaccinations are not expected until well into next year .
And once vaccination efforts start , they will not stop until all are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and unable to purchase or sell anything without the vaccine .
In August , Moderna said the United States government had agreed to buy 100 million doses of its vaccine candidate , with an option to buy 400 million more doses , for $ 2.48 billion in total .
The end game is an agenda in which all people are tracked , traced , and surveilled under the complete control of a totalitarian elite .
This vaccine is a piece of that agenda .
More Proof Trump Is Working On Bill Gates ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whether the vaccine is ready or not by the election , is of little consequence , the delay simply buys the people more time to figure out what ’ s going on and prepare for it .
So please prepare .
Do what you can with the information you have to make sure you are braced for this .
This vaccine and its rollout will be nothing like we ’ ve seen before .

Here’s a bit of good news: Moderna says its coronavirus vaccine being developed under Operation Warp Speed will not be available by the election. Moderna’s vaccine won’t be available until 2021.
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel told the Financial Times in an interview that Moderna, a Bi Pharma front-runner in the COVID-19 vaccine race, will not seek emergency-use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration until November 25 at the earliest and does not expect to have secured approval for distribution of the vaccine to the general public until spring 2021. “I think a late [first quarter], early [second quarter] approval is a reasonable timeline, based on what we know from our vaccine,” Bancel
Military Personnel OUTNUMBER Civilian Scientists In U.S. Vaccine Program
FDA Commissioner Is Willing To Skip Phase 3 Trials On COVID-19 Vaccine
Despite Trump’s assertions that a vaccine could be ready in weeks, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield told Congress earlier this month that widespread vaccinations are not expected until well into next year. And once vaccination efforts start, they will not stop until all are vaccinated or forced out of work, and unable to purchase or sell anything without the vaccine.
In August, Moderna said the United States government had agreed to buy 100 million doses of its vaccine candidate, with an option to buy 400 million more doses, for $2.48 billion in total.
The end game is an agenda in which all people are tracked, traced, and surveilled under the complete control of a totalitarian elite. This vaccine is a piece of that agenda.
More Proof Trump Is Working On Bill Gates’ Vaccine Under “Operation Warp Speed”
Whether the vaccine is ready or not by the election, is of little consequence, the delay simply buys the people more time to figure out what’s going on and prepare for it. So please prepare. Do what you can with the information you have to make sure you are braced for this.
This vaccine and its rollout will be nothing like we’ve seen before.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-02--Former CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo Wants to Watch His Political Opponents Get “Lined Up Against a Wa

Former CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo Wants to Watch His Political Opponents Get “ Lined Up Against a Wall and Shot in the Revolution ” What ’ s it going to take for Americans to see what is actually happening right in front of their eyes ?
Leftist Former CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo Wants to Watch His Political Opponents Get Lined Up Against a Wall and Shot in the “ Revolution ” Former Twitter CEO and multi-millionaire Dick Costolo admitted on Wednesday night that he wants to murder those people he doesn ’ t agree with politically .
Costolo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is a direct threat of murder posted on Twitter .
So will they shut down his account ?
Some Business Leaders Should Face A Firing Squad , Former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo Suggests In Angry Tweet CANNES , FRANCE – JUNE 20 : CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo speaks during The Twitter Seminar as part of … [ + ] Getty Images Many harsh words are traded on Twitter each day .
Dick Costolo , the former CEO of the company , added some of his own tonight .
Costolo was responding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s elite on Twitter over the past few days , an argument about whether the industry should actively promote social justice causes and encourage political conversations at work .
Costolo ’ s comments had the effect of dumping a jerrycan ’ s worth of fuel on the fire .
“ Me-first capitalists who think you can separate society from business are going to be the first people lined up against the wall and shot in the revolution , ” he tweeted .
“ I ’ ll happily provide video commentary.
” Costolo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like to see some of his peers face a firing squad—was jarring and reinforced the profoundly unusual and troubling circumstances that have enveloped corporate America this year .
Businesses have faced a deadly pandemic , a global recession and the most profound reckoning over civil rights in several generations , sparked by George Floyd ’ s death while in police custody last May .
By turn , corporations and the CEOs running those firms have been left wondering what role—if any—they should take in the movement , inaction on their part sometimes leading @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Former CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo Wants to Watch His Political Opponents Get “Lined Up Against a Wall and Shot in the Revolution”
What’s it going to take for Americans to see what is actually happening right in front of their eyes?
Leftist Former CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo Wants to Watch His Political Opponents Get Lined Up Against a Wall and Shot in the “Revolution”
By: Gateway Pundit, October 1, 2020:
Former Twitter CEO and multi-millionaire Dick Costolo admitted on Wednesday night that he wants to murder those people he doesn’t agree with politically.
Costolo tweeted this out on Wednesday night.
This is a direct threat of murder posted on Twitter.
So will they shut down his account?
Some Business Leaders Should Face A Firing Squad, Former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo Suggests In Angry Tweet
By: Abram Brown, Forbes Staff
Cannes Lions 59th International Festival of Creativity – The Twitter Seminar
CANNES, FRANCE – JUNE 20: CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo speaks during The Twitter Seminar as part of … [+] Getty Images
Many harsh words are traded on Twitter each day. Dick Costolo, the former CEO of the company, added some of his own tonight.
Costolo was responding to a debate that has consumed tech’s elite on Twitter over the past few days, an argument about whether the industry should actively promote social justice causes and encourage political conversations at work. Costolo’s comments had the effect of dumping a jerrycan’s worth of fuel on the fire. “Me-first capitalists who think you can separate society from business are going to be the first people lined up against the wall and shot in the revolution,” he tweeted. “I’ll happily provide video commentary.”
Costolo’s extraordinary language—suggesting he’d like to see some of his peers face a firing squad—was jarring and reinforced the profoundly unusual and troubling circumstances that have enveloped corporate America this year. Businesses have faced a deadly pandemic, a global recession and the most profound reckoning over civil rights in several generations, sparked by George Floyd’s death while in police custody last May. By turn, corporations and the CEOs running those firms have been left wondering what role—if any—they should take in the movement, inaction on their part sometimes leading to the unhappiness of their employees.
Me-first capitalists who think you can separate society from business are going to be the first people lined up against the wall and shot in the revolution. I'll happily provide video commentary. — dick costolo (@dickc) October 1, 2020
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-03--Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter:  Phony Test, Dangerous Drugs – Trump Is Poster Boy For COVID-19 Pro

Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter:  Phony Test, Dangerous Drugs – Trump Is Poster Boy For COVID-19 Propaganda

Former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport weighed in on the recent propaganda surrounding the allegations that President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania have tested positive for COVID-19 , something I actually question given that Trump was taking the “ miracle cure ” of hydroxychloroquine and zinc , along with wearing his mask .
However , I think it ’ s nothing more than political theater .
However , Rappoport warns that “ Trump is made into the poster boy for COVID-19 propaganda ” and that phony tests are now the gateway to dangerous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Walter Reed Hospital .
Watch out for toxic antiviral drugs ; e.g , remdesivir .
And ventilators ( lethal ) .
This is a field day for Biden , and also for promoters of the pandemic and all the regulations .
For example— “ everyone must get tested.
” Trump is made into the poster boy for COVID-19 propaganda .
“ The PRESIDENT has it.
” No matter what happens to Trump , this is another step in the ongoing coup .
UPDATE 2 : CNN reports— “ Trump had a fever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has received the unapproved experimental Regeneron treatment as well as the drug remdesivir , according to the President ’ s physician.
” NOT GOOD NEWS .
Regeneron is an experimental antibody cocktail .
Typically , when the news reports use of these drugs , no mention is made of negative effects or toxicity .
The Daily Mail reports : “ [ In an ongoing clinical trial of Regeneron ] Two patients who got the antibody cocktail drug had side effects .
One of them was ‘ serious , ’ though it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ person.
” In tests of antibody drugs , serious problems have occurred .
These are characterized as “ increased infection.
” Drugs.com discusses remdesivir : “ [ the drug ] has not been approved to treat coronavirus or COVID-19 .
It is not yet known if remdesivir is an effective treatment for any condition .
The FDA has authorized emergency use of remdesivir only in people with COVID-19 who are in a hospital .
You must remain under the care of a doctor while receiving remdesivir.
” Adverse effects , according to Drugs.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you have signs of an allergic reaction : hives ; difficult breathing ; swelling of your face , lips , tongue , or throat… ” More adverse effects : “ …chills , nausea , vomiting…increased sweating…a light-headed feeling , like you might pass out…abnormal liver function tests…anemia or decreased hemoglobin concentrations…acute kidney injury… ” And then we have this : “ [ remdesivir ] is being investigated for and is currently available under an FDA emergency use authorization ( EUA ) for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.
” Trump doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So why is he being given remdesivir at all—especially given all the adverse effects of the drug ?
Plus : NO ONE HAS EVER STUDIED THE EFFECTS OF COMBINING REGENERON AND REMDESIVIR—THE TWO DRUGS TRUMP IS TAKING .
The doctors are playing god with the president ’ s life .
And now we come to the diagnostic test—Big question : how many cycles was Trump ’ s COVID test set for ?
I ’ ll explain .
Each cycle of the PCR test is a quantum leap in magnification of the test sample @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knows , different labs use a different number of cycles when they perform the test .
There is no uniform standard .
That is a giant scandal , because when you do the test using more than , say , 30 cycles , all sorts of irrelevant and inconsequential material shows up that can be counted as “ positive for the coronavirus ” —when that is NOT the case .
This is exactly what is happening all over the world every day .
Too many cycles ; absurd and wrong diagnosis .
Could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rigged in this fashion ?
It ’ s as easy as pie .
Just increase the number of cycles .
Doesn ’ t matter how many times the test was repeated for “ confirmation.
” It ’ ll read positive if there are too many cycles .
Of course , no one will admit that Trump ’ s test was set for 40 cycles , if it was .
And guess what ?
The “ cycle problem ” is just one of many fatal flaws in the PCR test .
I ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is again : The need for the COVID test is being hyped to the skies .
More tests automatically create more case numbers .
This allows heads of state and national governments to whipsaw the public : “ We were re-opening the economy , but now , with the escalating case numbers , we ’ ll have to impose lockdowns again… ” This wreaks more havoc and economic destruction , which is the true goal of the COVID operation .
Its cruelty is boundless .
In this article , I present quotes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ test for the coronavirus , the PCR .
Spoiler alert : the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test are devastating .
“ Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
” Translation : A positive test doesn ’ t guarantee that the COVID virus is causing infection at all .
And , ahem , reading between the lines , maybe the COVID virus might not be in the patient ’ s body at all , either .
From @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ Coronavirus disease ( COVID-19 ) technical guidance : Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans ” [ 2 ] : “ Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development , both in-house and commercially .
Some assays may detect only the novel virus [ COVID ] and some may also detect other strains ( e.g .
SARS-CoV ) that are genetically similar.
” Translation : Some PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVID—including plain old coronas that cause nothing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ document adds this little piece : “ Protocol use limitations : Optional clinical specimens for testing has [ have ] not yet been validated.
” Translation : We ’ re not sure which tissue samples to take from the patient , in order for the test to have any validity .
From the FDA : “ LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary : ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION ( EUA ) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST ( LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA ) ” [ 3 ] : “ …The SARS-CoV-2RNA [ COVID virus ] is generally detectable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of infection .
Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA ; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE ( CAPS are mine ) .
Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.
” Translation : On the one hand , we claim the test can “ generally ” detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agent detected ” on the test , by which we mean COVID virus , “ may not be the definite cause of disease.
” We also admit that , unless the patient has an acute infection , we can ’ t find COVID .
Therefore , the idea of “ asymptomatic patients ” confirmed by the test is nonsense .
And even though a positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease , all positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “ COVID cases.
” Regardless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use only , not for use in diagnostic procedures.
” Translation : Don ’ t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease .
Oops .
Translation : Although this company states the test can detect COVID , it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body .
What is the test proving , then ?
Who knows ?
Flip a coin .
Translation : This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s body .
I ’ ll cover how important this admission is in a minute .
“ The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference , and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment .
The clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their symptoms/signs , history , other laboratory tests and treatment responses .
The detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis , and are only for the reference of clinicians.
” Translation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID .
And yet , this is exactly what health authorities are doing all over the world .
All positive tests must be reported to government agencies , and they are counted as COVID cases .
Those quotes , from official government and testing sources , torpedo the whole “ scientific ” basis of the test .
And now , I ’ ll add another lethal blow : the test has never been validated properly as an instrument to detect disease .
Even if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presence of the COVID virus in a patient , it doesn ’ t show HOW MUCH virus is in the body .
And that is key , because in order to even begin talking about actual illness in the real world , not in a lab , the patient would need to have millions and millions of the virus actively replicating in his body .
Proponents of the test assert that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body .
To which I reply : prove it .
Prove it in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decades ago—but never was .
Take five hundred people and remove tissue samples from them .
The people who take the samples do NOT do the test .
The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they ’ re in .
The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples .
In each case , they say which virus they found and HOW MUCH of it they found .
“ All right , in patients 24 , 46 , 65 , 76 , 87 , and 93 we found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we un-blind those patients .
They should all be sick , because they have so much virus replicating in their bodies .
Are they sick ?
Are they running marathons ?
Let ’ s find out .
This OBVIOUS vetting of the test has never been done .
That is an enormous scandal .
Where are the controlled test results in 500 patients , a thousand patients ?
Nowhere .
The PCR is an unproven fraud .
“ But…but…what about all the sick and dying people…why are they sick ?
” I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question , in past articles .
A NUMBER of conditions—none involving COVID , and most involving old traditional diseases—are making people sick .
There are other large-scale studies of the PCR test that have never been done .
I ’ ve covered them in detail , in prior articles .
To summarize : a study using a thousand patients , in which their tissue samples are sent to 30 different labs for analysis and verdicts , to see whether the results are uniform from lab to lab ; and a study of 1000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compared with the results of analysis by electron microcopy .
These large studies—never done .
In other words , the PCR test has never been adequately tested ; it has never been properly validated as a diagnostic tool .
Here , from Canadian researcher David Crowe ’ s bombshell paper , FLAWS IN CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC THEORY , is a key quote about the PCR test [ 5 ] : “ A review of 33 RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 approved under US FDA Emergency Use Authorizations showed a wide range of differences in what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they decided whether they had found it .
The tests look for a variety of different segments ( ‘ genes ’ ) of the presumed COVID-19 genome , that only amounts to about 1 % or less of the total genome , which is about 30,000 bases .
Perhaps the worst feature of the tests is how they decide whether the sample is positive if more than one [ ‘ gene ’ ] segment is being looked for .
Some tests look for only one , so it must be present for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two segments are split between those that require both to be present and those that require either one for a positive .
Some tests look for three segments but only require any two to be present , while one test insisted on all three .
Tests that allow a segment to be undetected raise the question of how it can be said that a virus was detected when an important part of it was missing.
” If the PCR is a uniform standardized test , a rabbit is a spaceship .
Speaking of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here is a quote from Stephen Bustin , who is considered one of the foremost experts on PCR in the world .
The excerpt is from his 2017 article , “ Talking the talk , but not walking the walk : RT-qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research ” [ 6 ] : “ Awareness of variability problems associated with PCR has been long-standing , with the first report describing inconsistencies with replicate and serial specimens evaluated within and between laboratories as early as 1992 .
The lack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ processes involved in PCR , especially with respect to the amplification of nonreproducible and/or unexpected amplification products , was also highlighted decades ago .
These observations and the resulting implications are largely disregarded.
” Here is the story of an epic failure of the PCR , right out in the open , for all to see .
The reference is the NY Times , January 22 , 2007 , “ Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn ’ t. ” [ 7 ] “ Dr .
Brooke Herndon , an internist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop coughing…By late April , other health care workers at the hospital were coughing… ” “ For months , nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak , with extensive ramifications .
Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon , N.H. , were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in ; 142 people , including Dr. Herndon , were told they appeared to have the disease ; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including some in intensive care.
” “ Then , about eight months later , health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.
” “ Now , as they look back on the episode , epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [ PCR ] that led them astray.
” “ There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Trish M. Perl , an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America .
But , she said , pseudo-epidemics happen all the time .
The Dartmouth case may have been one of the largest , but it was by no means an exception , she said.
” “ Many of the new molecular [ PCR ] tests are quick but technically demanding , and each laboratory may do them in its own way .
These tests , called ‘ home brews , ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are no good estimates of their error rates .
But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely , and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested , as occurred at Dartmouth , false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.
” “ ’ You ’ re in a little bit of no man ’ s land , ’ with the new molecular [ PCR ] tests , said Dr. Mark Perkins , an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Melinda Gates Foundation .
‘ All bets are off on exact performance ’ .
” “ With pertussis , she [ Dr. Kretsinger , CDC ] said , ‘ there are probably 100 different P.C.R .
protocols and methods being used throughout the country , ’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate .
‘ We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results , the disease was not pertussis , ’ Dr. Kretsinger added.
” “ Dr .
Cathy A.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the University of Utah , said the story had one clear lesson.
” “ ’ The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives , ’ Dr. Petti said .
‘ No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R ’ .
” There is more to report about the PCR test , and I have , but I ’ ll make this final point for now : I ’ ve presented , over the last several months , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ existence of the COVID virus , by proper scientific procedures , in the first place .
So the PCR test would be looking for…what ?
A virus that isn ’ t there ?
And on the back of this test , governments are wrecking economies all over the world , and untold numbers of human lives .
Pretty sure he is spot on .
Even more than that , our friend Brian Young adds this little insight .
You really have to ask yourself if the president of the united States is actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” drugs .
As a side note , while some are speculating about Trump being a 33rd-degree mason , one should keep in mind that this comes 33 days before the election , and you know how those people are with their numerology .
Just keep in mind that Donald Trump has been an actor and was groomed by the media and they loved him for decades until he ran for the White House… but I say they still do , it ’ s all an act and he ’ s the PT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world where it ’ s dying to go : straight into the New World Order .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport weighed in on the recent propaganda surrounding the allegations that President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania have tested positive for COVID-19, something I actually question given that Trump was taking the “miracle cure” of hydroxychloroquine and zinc, along with wearing his mask. However, I think it’s nothing more than political theater. However, Rappoport warns that “Trump is made into the poster boy for COVID-19 propaganda” and that phony tests are now the gateway to dangerous drugs.
Rappoport wrote:
UPDATE 1: Trump flown to Walter Reed Hospital. Watch out for toxic antiviral drugs; e.g, remdesivir. And ventilators (lethal). This is a field day for Biden, and also for promoters of the pandemic and all the regulations. For example—“everyone must get tested.” Trump is made into the poster boy for COVID-19 propaganda. “The PRESIDENT has it.” No matter what happens to Trump, this is another step in the ongoing coup.
UPDATE 2: CNN reports— “Trump had a fever Friday, a source said. He has received the unapproved experimental Regeneron treatment as well as the drug remdesivir, according to the President’s physician.” NOT GOOD NEWS.
Regeneron is an experimental antibody cocktail. Typically, when the news reports use of these drugs, no mention is made of negative effects or toxicity.
The Daily Mail reports: “[In an ongoing clinical trial of Regeneron] Two patients who got the antibody cocktail drug had side effects. One of them was ‘serious,’ though it’s not clear what exactly happened to that person.”
In tests of antibody drugs, serious problems have occurred. These are characterized as “increased infection.”
Drugs.com discusses remdesivir: “[the drug] has not been approved to treat coronavirus or COVID-19. It is not yet known if remdesivir is an effective treatment for any condition. The FDA has authorized emergency use of remdesivir only in people with COVID-19 who are in a hospital. You must remain under the care of a doctor while receiving remdesivir.”
Adverse effects, according to Drugs.com: “Get emergency medical help if you have signs of an allergic reaction: hives; difficult breathing; swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat…”
More adverse effects: “…chills, nausea, vomiting…increased sweating…a light-headed feeling, like you might pass out…abnormal liver function tests…anemia or decreased hemoglobin concentrations…acute kidney injury…”
And then we have this: “[remdesivir] is being investigated for and is currently available under an FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.”
Trump doesn’t have “severe COVID-19.” So why is he being given remdesivir at all—especially given all the adverse effects of the drug?
Plus: NO ONE HAS EVER STUDIED THE EFFECTS OF COMBINING REGENERON AND REMDESIVIR—THE TWO DRUGS TRUMP IS TAKING. The doctors are playing god with the president’s life.
And now we come to the diagnostic test—Big question: how many cycles was Trump’s COVID test set for? I’ll explain.
Each cycle of the PCR test is a quantum leap in magnification of the test sample Trump provided. As every PCR tech knows, different labs use a different number of cycles when they perform the test. There is no uniform standard.
That is a giant scandal, because when you do the test using more than, say, 30 cycles, all sorts of irrelevant and inconsequential material shows up that can be counted as “positive for the coronavirus”—when that is NOT the case.
This is exactly what is happening all over the world every day. Too many cycles; absurd and wrong diagnosis.
Could Trump’s COVID test have been rigged in this fashion? It’s as easy as pie. Just increase the number of cycles. Doesn’t matter how many times the test was repeated for “confirmation.” It’ll read positive if there are too many cycles. Of course, no one will admit that Trump’s test was set for 40 cycles, if it was.
And guess what? The “cycle problem” is just one of many fatal flaws in the PCR test. I’ve covered this subject many times. Here it is again:
COVID diagnostic test: worst test ever devised?
The need for the COVID test is being hyped to the skies. More tests automatically create more case numbers. This allows heads of state and national governments to whipsaw the public:
“We were re-opening the economy, but now, with the escalating case numbers, we’ll have to impose lockdowns again…”
This wreaks more havoc and economic destruction, which is the true goal of the COVID operation. Its cruelty is boundless.
In this article, I present quotes from official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus, the PCR.
Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test are devastating.
From “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [1]:
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”
Translation: A positive test doesn’t guarantee that the COVID virus is causing infection at all. And, ahem, reading between the lines, maybe the COVID virus might not be in the patient’s body at all, either.
From the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans” [2]:
“Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”
Translation: Some PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVID—including plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold.
The WHO document adds this little piece: “Protocol use limitations: Optional clinical specimens for testing has [have] not yet been validated.”
Translation: We’re not sure which tissue samples to take from the patient, in order for the test to have any validity.
From the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary: ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)” [3]:
“…The SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine). Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”
Translation: On the one hand, we claim the test can “generally” detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient. But we admit that “the agent detected” on the test, by which we mean COVID virus, “may not be the definite cause of disease.” We also admit that, unless the patient has an acute infection, we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of “asymptomatic patients” confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “COVID cases.” Regardless.
From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [4]:
“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”
Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.
“non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.”
Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.
“Application Qualitative”
Translation: This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. I’ll cover how important this admission is in a minute.
“The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests and treatment responses. The detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis, and are only for the reference of clinicians.”
Translation: Don’t use the test as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID. And yet, this is exactly what health authorities are doing all over the world. All positive tests must be reported to government agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.
Those quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole “scientific” basis of the test.
And now, I’ll add another lethal blow: the test has never been validated properly as an instrument to detect disease. Even if we blindly assumed it can detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient, it doesn’t show HOW MUCH virus is in the body. And that is key, because in order to even begin talking about actual illness in the real world, not in a lab, the patient would need to have millions and millions of the virus actively replicating in his body.
Proponents of the test assert that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body. To which I reply: prove it.
Prove it in a way it should have been proved decades ago—but never was.
Take five hundred people and remove tissue samples from them. The people who take the samples do NOT do the test. The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they’re in.
The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say which virus they found and HOW MUCH of it they found.
“All right, in patients 24, 46, 65, 76, 87, and 93 we found a great deal of virus.”
Now we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have so much virus replicating in their bodies. Are they sick? Are they running marathons? Let’s find out.
This OBVIOUS vetting of the test has never been done. That is an enormous scandal. Where are the controlled test results in 500 patients, a thousand patients? Nowhere.
The PCR is an unproven fraud.
“But…but…what about all the sick and dying people…why are they sick?”
I’ve written thousands of words answering that question, in past articles. A NUMBER of conditions—none involving COVID, and most involving old traditional diseases—are making people sick.
There are other large-scale studies of the PCR test that have never been done. I’ve covered them in detail, in prior articles. To summarize: a study using a thousand patients, in which their tissue samples are sent to 30 different labs for analysis and verdicts, to see whether the results are uniform from lab to lab; and a study of 1000 patients, in which the results are compared with the results of analysis by electron microcopy. These large studies—never done.
In other words, the PCR test has never been adequately tested; it has never been properly validated as a diagnostic tool.
Here, from Canadian researcher David Crowe’s bombshell paper, FLAWS IN CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC THEORY, is a key quote about the PCR test [5]:
“A review of 33 RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 approved under US FDA Emergency Use Authorizations showed a wide range of differences in what the tests were looking for and how they decided whether they had found it. The tests look for a variety of different segments (‘genes’) of the presumed COVID-19 genome, that only amounts to about 1% or less of the total genome, which is about 30,000 bases. Perhaps the worst feature of the tests is how they decide whether the sample is positive if more than one [‘gene’] segment is being looked for. Some tests look for only one, so it must be present for a positive. But tests that look for two segments are split between those that require both to be present and those that require either one for a positive. Some tests look for three segments but only require any two to be present, while one test insisted on all three. Tests that allow a segment to be undetected raise the question of how it can be said that a virus was detected when an important part of it was missing.”
If the PCR is a uniform standardized test, a rabbit is a spaceship.
Speaking of lack of uniformity in test results, here is a quote from Stephen Bustin, who is considered one of the foremost experts on PCR in the world. The excerpt is from his 2017 article, “Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: RT-qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research” [6]:
“Awareness of variability problems associated with PCR has been long-standing, with the first report describing inconsistencies with replicate and serial specimens evaluated within and between laboratories as early as 1992. The lack of a theoretical understanding of the dynamic processes involved in PCR, especially with respect to the amplification of nonreproducible and/or unexpected amplification products, was also highlighted decades ago. These observations and the resulting implications are largely disregarded.”
Here is the story of an epic failure of the PCR, right out in the open, for all to see. The reference is the NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.” [7]
“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”
“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”
“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”
“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”
“There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one of the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”
“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”
“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”
“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”
“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”
“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”
There is more to report about the PCR test, and I have, but I’ll make this final point for now: I’ve presented, over the last several months, compelling evidence that no one proved the existence of the COVID virus, by proper scientific procedures, in the first place. So the PCR test would be looking for…what? A virus that isn’t there?
And on the back of this test, governments are wrecking economies all over the world, and untold numbers of human lives.
Pretty sure he is spot on. Even more than that, our friend Brian Young adds this little insight. You really have to ask yourself if the president of the united States is actually willing to go along with “experimental” drugs.
As a side note, while some are speculating about Trump being a 33rd-degree mason, one should keep in mind that this comes 33 days before the election, and you know how those people are with their numerology.
Just keep in mind that Donald Trump has been an actor and was groomed by the media and they loved him for decades until he ran for the White House… but I say they still do, it’s all an act and he’s the PT Barnum of the 21st century, leading the world where it’s dying to go: straight into the New World Order.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-03--Kate Shemirani & Dr. Kevin Corbett Expose The Latest Horrifying Tyranny In UK & Vaccines

The tyranny that is surrounding the world , and especially the United Kingdom , is becoming is growing exponentially the more the people allow those that represent them to violate their authority and the law that is to protect the people ’ s rights .
The Sons of Liberty ’ s health and wellness expert , nurse Kate Shemirani , and Dr. Kevin Corbett join me in this episode to explain how Britain ’ s lawmakers are infringing on the people ’ s rights and give us an update on the coming COVID vaccine .
Help support the cause to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here to donate !
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to his `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

The tyranny that is surrounding the world, and especially the United Kingdom, is becoming is growing exponentially the more the people allow those that represent them to violate their authority and the law that is to protect the people’s rights. The Sons of Liberty’s health and wellness expert, nurse Kate Shemirani, and Dr. Kevin Corbett join me in this episode to explain how Britain’s lawmakers are infringing on the people’s rights and give us an update on the coming COVID vaccine.
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media