thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--Finland: Woman Complains About Finnish Men – She is Murdered By Her Muslim Migrant Boyfriend

According to MTV News , a man suspected of murder in Hämeenlinna earlier this week has murdered his ex-girlfriend and has subsequently committed suicide .
The crime , which was investigated as a murder , occurred in a private apartment between Monday and Tuesday night .
The police have been very quiet about the case .
It said Tuesday that the offender reported the crime after seeing signs of a crime in the apartment .
Police have not said what kind of observations the person had .
Police have said the case is in the early stages of investigation and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the instrument used .
Marko Mäkinen , the investigator-in-charge of the case , told MTV News today that the police will not comment on the incident but will announce it early next week .
In the town of Hämeenlinna in southern Finland , neighbours of the young Finnish woman Sanni Ovsaka alerted the police during the night on Tuesday because a large amount of blood flowed out from under the entrance door to the woman ’ s apartment .
Only few media report about the case , apparently one is trying to cover @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know so far is that the perpetrator is Hasan Alqina , a rejected Palestinian asylum seeker.According to the channel MTV Finland , the perpetrator committed suicide after the crime .
According to unconfirmed sources , the young woman was decapitated , as evidenced by the amount of blood that flowed into the stairwell corridor .
Alqina is said to have come to Finland in 2015 .
The bodybuilder is said to have had connections to Hamas sympathizers.The victim probably had a relationship with the Palestinian and wanted to leave him .
Finnish pundit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has an Arab asylum seeker boyfriend and writes social media posts about how sh**ty white men are .
Any guesses on how this turned out ?
” She then posted an image of the apartment door where the young woman was found .
Notice the pool of blood at the bottom .
Wiik then tweeted : “ So to be clear , this happened on Monday in Hämeenlinna , Finland .
The girl was murdered by the boyfriend she was trying to leave .
Not the first such case in Finland .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one Iraqi decapitated a middle-age woman who was trying to leave him.
” The killer was raised in a culture of violence that calls for the beating of disobedient women .
The Qur ’ an says : “ Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other , and because they spend their wealth to maintain them .
Good women are obedient .
They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them .
As for those from whom you fear disobedience , admonish them and send @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” ( Qur ’ an 4:34 ) And in a hadith , Aisha , Muhammad ’ s child bride , says that Muhammad “ struck me on the chest which caused me pain , and then said : Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you ?
” ( Sahih Muslim 2127 ) The National File reached out to Wiik .
Here ’ s what she told them .
National File reached out to Wiik , who said : “ What the police have confirmed this far is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on night between Monday and Tuesday by her ex , who then committed suicide .
“ His asylum request had been denied earlier .
From social media accounts reveal the killer is Hasan Alqina , who says he was born in Jaffa , Israel–apparently Palestinian.
” She added : “ This photo was taken by a neighbor .
There is talk about the woman being decapitated , but that ’ s not confirmed yet and might simply be an assumption .
“ Earlier there was a case in Pori in which an Iraqi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she ended a relationship .
He decapitated her and burned her apartment.
” This is the culture that comes with Islam and it has a 1,400 year track record to prove it .

According to MTV News, a man suspected of murder in Hämeenlinna earlier this week has murdered his ex-girlfriend and has subsequently committed suicide.
The crime, which was investigated as a murder, occurred in a private apartment between Monday and Tuesday night.
The police are silent
The police have been very quiet about the case. It said Tuesday that the offender reported the crime after seeing signs of a crime in the apartment. Police have not said what kind of observations the person had.
Police have said the case is in the early stages of investigation and have not commented on the crime or the instrument used.
Marko Mäkinen, the investigator-in-charge of the case, told MTV News today that the police will not comment on the incident but will announce it early next week.
German blogger Eingestellt von Medforth wrote:
In the town of Hämeenlinna in southern Finland, neighbours of the young Finnish woman Sanni Ovsaka alerted the police during the night on Tuesday because a large amount of blood flowed out from under the entrance door to the woman’s apartment. Only few media report about the case, apparently one is trying to cover up the cruel crime. All we know so far is that the perpetrator is Hasan Alqina, a rejected Palestinian asylum seeker.According to the channel MTV Finland, the perpetrator committed suicide after the crime. According to unconfirmed sources, the young woman was decapitated, as evidenced by the amount of blood that flowed into the stairwell corridor. Alqina is said to have come to Finland in 2015. The bodybuilder is said to have had connections to Hamas sympathizers.The victim probably had a relationship with the Palestinian and wanted to leave him.
Finnish pundit Tiina Wiik tweeted: “Young woman has an Arab asylum seeker boyfriend and writes social media posts about how sh**ty white men are. Any guesses on how this turned out?”
https://twitter.com/SwanOfTuonela/status/1220345332418084864
She then posted an image of the apartment door where the young woman was found. Notice the pool of blood at the bottom.
https://twitter.com/SwanOfTuonela/status/1220345818848342022
Wiik then tweeted: “So to be clear, this happened on Monday in Hämeenlinna, Finland. The girl was murdered by the boyfriend she was trying to leave. Not the first such case in Finland. One Afghan raped and burned his girlfriend, one Iraqi decapitated a middle-age woman who was trying to leave him.”
https://twitter.com/Teemu_Lahtinen/status/1220470722381959170
Islamic scholar Robert Spencer wrote:
The killer was raised in a culture of violence that calls for the beating of disobedient women. The Qur’an says: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” (Qur’an 4:34)
And in a hadith, Aisha, Muhammad’s child bride, says that Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?” (Sahih Muslim 2127)
The National File reached out to Wiik. Here’s what she told them.
National File reached out to Wiik, who said: “What the police have confirmed this far is this: a young woman was murdered on night between Monday and Tuesday by her ex, who then committed suicide.
“His asylum request had been denied earlier. From social media accounts reveal the killer is Hasan Alqina, who says he was born in Jaffa, Israel–apparently Palestinian.”
She added: “This photo was taken by a neighbor. There is talk about the woman being decapitated, but that’s not confirmed yet and might simply be an assumption.
“Earlier there was a case in Pori in which an Iraqi asylum seeker killed a middle-age woman after she ended a relationship. He decapitated her and burned her apartment.”
This is the culture that comes with Islam and it has a 1,400 year track record to prove it.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--Journalist Demands Trump DOJ Answer Why It Demands Permissions To Exercise Rights Protected Under Se

Journalist Demands Trump DOJ Answer Why It Demands Permissions To Exercise Rights Protected Under Second Amendment While Crowing About No Permissions To Exercise Rights Protected Under First Amendment The Department of Justice , under President Donald Trump and led by swamp creature Bill Barr who not only supported the FBI in their illegal raid at Ruby Ridge but supported the very sniper that shot an innocent , unarmed woman with a baby in her hands , has been called to account by journalist David Codrea over their hypocritical stand concerning no need for government permission to exercise rights protected under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time demand people jump through government hoops to exercise their rights protected under the Second Amendment .
On Tuesday , a Freedom of Information Act request was filed with the DOJ by attorney Stephen D. Stamboulieh on behalf of Codrea .
Guns in the News has the story : A Freedom of Information Act request was filed Tuesday with the Department of Justice by attorney Stephen D. Stamboulieh .
The request , filed on behalf of this writer , seeks DOJ “ statements of interest ” in defense of the Second Amendment comparable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defense of the First Amendment .
“ Imagine a society in which a citizen must petition the government for permission to meet with his fellow citizens , ” the DOJ wrote in its statement filed in December in Brown v Jones County Junior College .
“ Imagine further that such requests must be made at least three days in advance of the requested meeting , and that the government has unbridled discretion to determine who may meet with whom , and about what they might speak .
Such extreme preconditions to speech might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the fictional dystopian superstate in George Orwell ’ s Nineteen Eighty-Four .
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution , however , ensures that preconditions like these have no place in the United States of America.
” But “ preconditions like these ” have a place in the United States of America when it comes to the right of the people to keep and bear arms ?
Considering the historical evils that have always accompanied a “ monopoly of violence , ” Orwell ’ s Oceania seems like a resort community @ @ @ @ @ @ @ VIOLATIONS FOR OTHER RIGHTS , BUT WHERE THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS CONCERNED , STATE ENTITIES CAN DO AS THEY PLEASE WITHOUT FEAR OF FEDERAL CHECKS ?
EVEN THOUGH INFRINGEMENTS DIRECTLY AFFECT THE “ SECURITY OF A FREE STATE ” BY DISARMING THE CITIZEN MILITIA ?
Codrea wrote , “ This reminds me of nothing so much as “ The Ashcroft Petition ’ project I co-authored and co-administered several years back .
After then-Attorney General John Ashcroft had declared “ the text and the original intent of the Second Amendment clearly protect the right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” my colleagues and I decided to see if those were just words or if there was any chance the DOJ would do its job and protect individual rights from being infringed.
” “ The upshot—after collecting and submitting over 40,000 mailed-in signatures from supporters across the country ( including ‘ Gunners Guru ’ Col. Jeff Cooper ) , the only official reply we got was a mealy-mouthed nothing burger , pointedly sent from the head of DOJ ’ s Terrorism and Violent Crime Section , ” Codrea continued .
“ That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ letter to then-NRA-ILA head James Jay Baker demanding that he instruct their California field rep to stop telling people not to sign the petition because those of us behind it were ‘ wild-eyed extremists . '
” Codrea continued , “ In any case , today is supposedly a new day and we have since had two Supreme Court cases confirming what Mr. Ashcroft once assured us , that the Second Amendment is an individual right .
So now it ’ s time to find out what , if anything , our Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it acknowledges in court filings to enforce against government actions “ that deprive persons of rights , privileges , or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
” It ’ s time to find out what kind of “ appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice ” we can expect from those whose entire existence is justified on doing just that.
” Frankly , I wouldn ’ t expect a reply from these snakes posing as “ constitutionalists.
” Barr has shown his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of red flag laws , asset forfeiture and a host of other unconstitutional positions .
It ’ s past time that we stop petitioning government for answers and start cleaning house , especially among un-elected bureaucrats that cover for cold-blooded murderers like Bill Barr .
FOIA DOJ Statement of Inter… by NoloContendere on Scribd Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Journalist Demands Trump DOJ Answer Why It Demands Permissions To Exercise Rights Protected Under Second Amendment While Crowing About No Permissions To Exercise Rights Protected Under First Amendment
The Department of Justice, under President Donald Trump and led by swamp creature Bill Barr who not only supported the FBI in their illegal raid at Ruby Ridge but supported the very sniper that shot an innocent, unarmed woman with a baby in her hands, has been called to account by journalist David Codrea over their hypocritical stand concerning no need for government permission to exercise rights protected under the First Amendment while at the same time demand people jump through government hoops to exercise their rights protected under the Second Amendment.
On Tuesday, a Freedom of Information Act request was filed with the DOJ by attorney Stephen D. Stamboulieh on behalf of Codrea.
Guns in the News has the story:
A Freedom of Information Act request was filed Tuesday with the Department of Justice by attorney Stephen D. Stamboulieh. The request, filed on behalf of this writer, seeks DOJ “statements of interest” in defense of the Second Amendment comparable to what the Department has done in defense of the First Amendment.
“Imagine a society in which a citizen must petition the government for permission to meet with his fellow citizens,” the DOJ wrote in its statement filed in December in Brown v Jones County Junior College. “Imagine further that such requests must be made at least three days in advance of the requested meeting, and that the government has unbridled discretion to determine who may meet with whom, and about what they might speak. Such extreme preconditions to speech might not be out of place in Oceania, the fictional dystopian superstate in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, however, ensures that preconditions like these have no place in the United States of America.”
But “preconditions like these” have a place in the United States of America when it comes to the right of the people to keep and bear arms? Considering the historical evils that have always accompanied a “monopoly of violence,” Orwell’s Oceania seems like a resort community.
“The United States further states that the Attorney General enforces 34 U.S.C. § 12601 ‘which provides in relevant part that governmental authorities and their agents may not ‘engage in a pattern or practice by law enforcement officers… that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States’ and that the Attorney General ‘may in a civil action obtain the appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice,’” the DOJ statement asserted.
SO THEY’LL GO AFTER VIOLATIONS FOR OTHER RIGHTS, BUT WHERE THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS CONCERNED, STATE ENTITIES CAN DO AS THEY PLEASE WITHOUT FEAR OF FEDERAL CHECKS? EVEN THOUGH INFRINGEMENTS DIRECTLY AFFECT THE “SECURITY OF A FREE STATE” BY DISARMING THE CITIZEN MILITIA?
So much for “the supreme Law of the Land.”
Codrea wrote, “This reminds me of nothing so much as “The Ashcroft Petition’ project I co-authored and co-administered several years back. After then-Attorney General John Ashcroft had declared “the text and the original intent of the Second Amendment clearly protect the right of individuals to keep and bear firearms,” my colleagues and I decided to see if those were just words or if there was any chance the DOJ would do its job and protect individual rights from being infringed.”
“The upshot—after collecting and submitting over 40,000 mailed-in signatures from supporters across the country (including ‘Gunners Guru’ Col. Jeff Cooper), the only official reply we got was a mealy-mouthed nothing burger, pointedly sent from the head of DOJ’s Terrorism and Violent Crime Section,” Codrea continued. “That, and I had to write a letter to then-NRA-ILA head James Jay Baker demanding that he instruct their California field rep to stop telling people not to sign the petition because those of us behind it were ‘wild-eyed extremists.'”
Codrea continued, “In any case, today is supposedly a new day and we have since had two Supreme Court cases confirming what Mr. Ashcroft once assured us, that the Second Amendment is an individual right. So now it’s time to find out what, if anything, our Department of Justice has done to fulfill duties it acknowledges in court filings to enforce against government actions “that deprive persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” It’s time to find out what kind of “appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice” we can expect from those whose entire existence is justified on doing just that.”
Frankly, I wouldn’t expect a reply from these snakes posing as “constitutionalists.” Barr has shown his disregard for the Constitution in his support of red flag laws, asset forfeiture and a host of other unconstitutional positions.
It’s past time that we stop petitioning government for answers and start cleaning house, especially among un-elected bureaucrats that cover for cold-blooded murderers like Bill Barr.
Here’s a copy of Codrea’s FOIA request.
FOIA DOJ Statement of Inter… by NoloContendere on Scribd
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--Super Bowl LIV Will Feature Drag Queens Ad For First Time Ever

I have been out of sports for decades .
I used to play basketball , football , baseball and run track in school , but those things , while they can be used to glorify God , are not the pursuit of either my life or my happiness .
Yet , for many , sports is an idol that they worship at every chance they get .
They can tell you more about their favorite sport team than they can list the Ten Commandments , the twelve apostles , or like President Donald Trump actually cite an actual Bible verse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will forsake the assembling of themselves with the people of God in order to watch the Super Bowl only to find that there will be a first ever ad with drag queens featured in it .
Drag queens , for the first time , will appear in a Super Bowl advertisement .
“ RuPaul ’ s Drag Race ” alumni Kim Chi and Miz Cracker will make history in a commercial for hummus brand Sabra during the football championship game Feb. 2 , when the Kansas City Chiefs will face the San Francisco @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ad campaign , which the New York-based company posted on its YouTube channel last week , Miz Cracker clumsily attempts to put a football helmet on over her sizable wig .
“ I hope this doesn ’ t give me helmet hair , ” she says , while Kim Chi looks on skeptically .
The Sabra campaign will also feature rapper T-Pain and another reality television duo : former “ Real Housewives of New Jersey ” rivals Caroline Manzo and Teresa Giudice , according to AdWeek .
“ For queer audiences , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outsiders ’ language , ” Witek said of drag .
“ Reaching the Super Bowl means taking our language into every home in the nation and millions around the world.
” Witeck said the Sabra ad , which could reach around 100 million viewers during the Super Bowl , is indicative of a sea change in the public perception of drag , which he said has been normalized in the mainstream for many years , thanks in large part to the success of the award-winning reality show “ RuPaul ’ s Drag Race.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ultimate test , when you can take chances like this and realize that the fear of drag is nothing people imagined it to be , ” he said .
“ It ’ s us telling our own joke about ourselves , with a sense of humor and authenticity … with luck , everyone laughs with us.
” In addition to men dressing like women , which God calls an “ abomination ” ( Deuteronomy 22:5 ) , you can expect to also witness the Super Bowl ’ s first female and openly gay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That ’ s not surprising considering it is San Francisco .
If you can even stomach it , here ’ s the ad .
And yet , “ men ” in the united States will tolerate this .
Oh I know , you guys will spew your venom , but you won ’ t lift a finger to actually stop the crimes of these people in our country .
Really , it ’ s more important what you do than what you say ( James 2 ) … and many men reading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you stop being entertained by men wearing tights and fighting over a ball wrapped in pigskin and start actually doing something to fight against the tyranny that is out not only for your liberty , but the freedom of your children .
I have just one question as to where you stand knowing this : Are you still going to tune in ?
Or will you be one of those who justify your support of the Super Bowl even though they are promoting what God condemns ?

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!” -Isaiah 5:20,21
I have been out of sports for decades. I used to play basketball, football, baseball and run track in school, but those things, while they can be used to glorify God, are not the pursuit of either my life or my happiness. Yet, for many, sports is an idol that they worship at every chance they get. They can tell you more about their favorite sport team than they can list the Ten Commandments, the twelve apostles, or like President Donald Trump actually cite an actual Bible verse and its reference. Yet, many will forsake the assembling of themselves with the people of God in order to watch the Super Bowl only to find that there will be a first ever ad with drag queens featured in it.
NBC News has the story:
Drag queens, for the first time, will appear in a Super Bowl advertisement. “RuPaul’s Drag Race” alumni Kim Chi and Miz Cracker will make history in a commercial for hummus brand Sabra during the football championship game Feb. 2, when the Kansas City Chiefs will face the San Francisco 49ers.
In the teaser for the ad campaign, which the New York-based company posted on its YouTube channel last week, Miz Cracker clumsily attempts to put a football helmet on over her sizable wig.
“I hope this doesn’t give me helmet hair,” she says, while Kim Chi looks on skeptically.
The Sabra campaign will also feature rapper T-Pain and another reality television duo: former “Real Housewives of New Jersey” rivals Caroline Manzo and Teresa Giudice, according to AdWeek.
Bob Witeck, a longtime marketing strategist who specializes in reaching LGBTQ audiences, called Sabra’s drag ad “revolutionary.”
“For queer audiences, it is an art form and an ‘outsiders’ language,” Witek said of drag. “Reaching the Super Bowl means taking our language into every home in the nation and millions around the world.”
Witeck said the Sabra ad, which could reach around 100 million viewers during the Super Bowl, is indicative of a sea change in the public perception of drag, which he said has been normalized in the mainstream for many years, thanks in large part to the success of the award-winning reality show “RuPaul’s Drag Race.”
“The Super Bowl is the ultimate test, when you can take chances like this and realize that the fear of drag is nothing people imagined it to be,” he said. “It’s us telling our own joke about ourselves, with a sense of humor and authenticity … with luck, everyone laughs with us.”
That’s not all.
In addition to men dressing like women, which God calls an “abomination” (Deuteronomy 22:5), you can expect to also witness the Super Bowl’s first female and openly gay coach: Katie Sowers of the 49ers.
That’s not surprising considering it is San Francisco.
If you can even stomach it, here’s the ad.
And yet, “men” in the united States will tolerate this. Oh I know, you guys will spew your venom, but you won’t lift a finger to actually stop the crimes of these people in our country. Really, it’s more important what you do than what you say (James 2)… and many men reading this will call themselves Christians..
I suggest you stop being entertained by men wearing tights and fighting over a ball wrapped in pigskin and start actually doing something to fight against the tyranny that is out not only for your liberty, but the freedom of your children.
I have just one question as to where you stand knowing this: Are you still going to tune in? Or will you be one of those who justify your support of the Super Bowl even though they are promoting what God condemns?
Remember:
You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. -James 4:4


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--USMCA:  The Crushing Blow – Part 3

USMCA:  The Crushing Blow – Part 3

Anti Fed Ed Warriors , in today ’ s installment of my “ Crushing Blow ” series , we ’ ll take an upclose look at the USMCA ’ s supporting document as published by the US government ’ s ITC ( International Trade Commission ) .
I first brought this document about the expected economic impart to America in Part Two .
In Part One , you were given the overall educratic overreaches for every single American , regardless of school location OR age .
Did I leave out ‘ school choice ’ on purpose ?
Yes , because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ITC Report that education is nothing more than worker preparation under the guise of skill based training .
As I ’ ve told you repeatedly here on my blog and in hundreds of interviews , Page 17 of the ESSA ( Every Student Succeeds Act ) wiped out ‘ school choice ’ with the mandate for all education being aligned to the SAME post-secondary readiness standards !
As one of my most trusted fellow Anti CCSS Warriors has stated , the only choice we ’ re really left is , location of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the USMCA and the ITC is SO strong , we ’ ve seen this ESSA mandate played against us .
Warriors , make no mistake , ‘ every student ’ is NOT reserved for one type of education , it means ALL .
Warriors , in Part Two , I also gave you a visual from the USMCA pages where all 17 of the UN ’ s ( United Nations ) SDGs ( Sustainable Development Goals ) were woven into education AND labor ( jobs ) .
If you missed Part Two , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ITC April 2019 Report : Warriors , The International Trade Commission ’ s Report was supposed to be all about how great the USMCA ’ s impact on America would be , however , it also shared some troubling aspects , especially on our side of the War Vs the Core .
As I shared in Part Two , there are 9 ITC chapters to cover the USMCA ’ s 34 chapters .
Below , I given you a brief summary of how these 2 documents intersect .
Warriors , if you ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the one with the SDGs embedded in the USMCA , feel free to download them .
Both are ready to be shared with anyone you feel needs a ‘ wake up call ’ .
Warriors , I can also tell you that because the USMCA sets up several Regional Commissions to rule over us , the ITC ’ s document does cover how these may also impact our economy .
The winners will be the government and any partnering group or organization they delegate .
The Commission members can be ANYONE the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are the biggest losers , both in how we live and how we ’ re treated .
Think about this , anyone the government desires .
That includes educrats , CCSS Machine members , or anyone else who may or may NOT be qualified !
We already know that the U.S. Dept .
of Education is unconstitutional , but SO is the U.S. Dept .
of Labor !
The USMCA does state ( Chapter 23 , Labor ) that Statutes and regulations for the US under , it will be acts of Congress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Constitution .
However , almost immediately after that statement , the ILO ’ s ( International Labor Organization ) Declaration on Social Justice for Fair Globalization ( 2008 ) is embedded .
The Declaration fully embraces and charges member nations to embed Sustainable Development Goal # 8 , Decent Work for All .
( *Note , if you are interested in the ILO ’ s video on the importance of the Declaration , watch this 10 minute propaganda piece .
While the US is not featured as a country in need , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all member states need to co-operate and use the Declaration ; if they don ’ t , they harm other countries . )
Warriors , the elephant in the room is this : since the U.S. Constitution has been consistently ignored BEFORE the USMCA , and all that ’ s been shared in this series about the global overreaches , how MUCH of the Constitution will even still be honored ?
!
Yes , Warriors , the ILO was a big player in the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) Conference .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pushing global workforce for America , was Ivanka Trump .
Her plans for the US are a bit chilling .
Her ‘ vision ’ includes using massive amounts of ‘ big data ’ to play matchmaker between the employer and the ‘ qualified ’ worker .
Before the WEF Conference , Ivanka Trump was a featured speaker at the CES ( Consumer Electronics Show ) .
While she talked about the importance of private industry partnering with the government in re-skilling and up-skilling Americans , the elephant in this room is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based education .
Public private partnerships completely bypass the U. S. Constitution and mute We the People !
Think of it this way , if it ’ s not the government herding us around , it ’ s going to be private industry .
Here ’ s another truthful piece of evidence to support this , in the ITC document ( for what the USMCA will do for America ’ s economy ) , under Article 19.16 , the companies with the most capability to profit off the USMCA include Google , Amazon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the screenshot below , you ’ ll see two of them .
However , as we know , the CCSS Machine ’ s data mining ( aka student data rape ) arms are many .
Some of those groups are featured below , too .
From another WEF attendee , IBM , their list of the 22 jobs most in danger .
Look how many are skill based .
From the US ITC ’ s document , the 5 classes of workers ( caste system ) : Warriors , under the USMCA , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ auto industry , fishing industries , and , the timber industries .
Agriculture jobs will be hit hard as well .
The ITC document states that only 176,000 jobs will be the expected growth .
Of those , 124,000 will be in the service sector of that number , 50,000 in manufacturing and 2,000 in food/agriculture .
The lion ’ s share of skilled workers will be in data transfer .
Does this match the supposed millions of jobs Ivanka Trump keeps boasting about ?
Does this sound like a positive growth step @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we realize just how much the loss of entire industries will throw us into mass chaos ?
Related Resources : 1 ) In the 10 minutes ILO video , a program called STED was mentioned .
Here ’ s the 133 page 2012 document .
STED stands for ‘ Skills for Trade and Economic Diversification ’ .
2 ) From 2017 , the WTO ( World Trade Organization ) publication on Investing in Skills for Inclusion .
The United States is embedded 18 times in this document .
Some even tie Mexico and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at least one of the sources cited in this document is US educational attainment and the economy .
3 ) The EuroNews interview with the ILO General , Guy Rider shared how inequality in work and wages is a global hot button .
If you ’ d like to see other global employer hype from the Davos meeting from the ILO , go here .
4 ) To see the other WEF re-skill and skill based labor training ( aka ‘ education ’ ) , go here .
Be sure to look for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a skilled labor force .
“ Soft skills ” are code for Social Emotional Learning ( SEL ) .
5 ) From 2015 , here on my blog , I gave you a pair of articles about the push at that time for ‘ upskilling ’ America .
Ivanka used that term in some of her recent speeches .
Warriors , in my upcoming closing installment for the “ Crushing Blow ” series , I ’ ll be sharing if there ’ s any recourse for us , as a free citizenry .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the USMCA is supposed to be active for the next 16 years .
That ’ s the year 2036 .
As one of my radio hosts said , ‘ I don ’ t believe America will last 16 years of this.
’ From 2002 to today , Lynne has been a featured speaker at small meetings and large conferences .
Since 2009 , she has served as a frequent guest on nationwide radio and multimedia shows .
Lynne also co-established PIE NC ( Preserving Integrity and Excellence in Education ) .
She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ teacher and regionally recognized support group leader .
She has also been a business owner , worked with children 's ministry and currently is an education liaison for Protecting Innocence Campaign ( based in OH ) , wife and mom .
Lynne is also an adviser to the national grassroots campaign `` Child Abuse in the Classroom '' , where it is the campaign 's belief that `` Repealing ESSA and Restoring FERPA '' are the best ways to help restore our nation 's education system .
She was also awarded the 2011 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ High School Scholars , as well as the 2016 L & B Network 's Torchbearer Award for educational advocacy .
She has been recognized by her peers as an expert in Common Core , Career Tech Education , Career Pathways , workforce and competency-based education reform , federal overreaches into education and our families .

Anti Fed Ed Warriors, in today’s installment of my “Crushing Blow” series, we’ll take an upclose look at the USMCA’s supporting document as published by the US government’s ITC (International Trade Commission). I first brought this document about the expected economic impart to America in Part Two.
In Part One, you were given the overall educratic overreaches for every single American, regardless of school location OR age. Did I leave out ‘school choice’ on purpose? Yes, because it’s in the USMCA and the ITC Report that education is nothing more than worker preparation under the guise of skill based training.
As I’ve told you repeatedly here on my blog and in hundreds of interviews, Page 17 of the ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) wiped out ‘school choice’ with the mandate for all education being aligned to the SAME post-secondary readiness standards! As one of my most trusted fellow Anti CCSS Warriors has stated, the only choice we’re really left is, location of the school.
Because the evidence from the USMCA and the ITC is SO strong, we’ve seen this ESSA mandate played against us. Warriors, make no mistake, ‘every student’ is NOT reserved for one type of education, it means ALL.
Warriors, in Part Two, I also gave you a visual from the USMCA pages where all 17 of the UN’s (United Nations) SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) were woven into education AND labor (jobs). If you missed Part Two, here it is again.
From The ITC April 2019 Report:
Warriors, The International Trade Commission’s Report was supposed to be all about how great the USMCA’s impact on America would be, however, it also shared some troubling aspects, especially on our side of the War Vs the Core. As I shared in Part Two, there are 9 ITC chapters to cover the USMCA’s 34 chapters. Below, I given you a brief summary of how these 2 documents intersect.
Warriors, if you’d like to share this visual or the one with the SDGs embedded in the USMCA, feel free to download them. Both are ready to be shared with anyone you feel needs a ‘wake up call’.
Warriors, I can also tell you that because the USMCA sets up several Regional Commissions to rule over us, the ITC’s document does cover how these may also impact our economy. The winners will be the government and any partnering group or organization they delegate. The Commission members can be ANYONE the government desires to serve. We the People are the biggest losers, both in how we live and how we’re treated.
Think about this, anyone the government desires. That includes educrats, CCSS Machine members, or anyone else who may or may NOT be qualified! We already know that the U.S. Dept. of Education is unconstitutional, but SO is the U.S. Dept. of Labor!
The USMCA does state (Chapter 23, Labor) that Statutes and regulations for the US under,it will be acts of Congress OR pursuant to and include the U.S. Constitution. However, almost immediately after that statement, the ILO’s (International Labor Organization) Declaration on Social Justice for Fair Globalization (2008) is embedded. The Declaration fully embraces and charges member nations to embed Sustainable Development Goal #8, Decent Work for All. (*Note, if you are interested in the ILO’s video on the importance of the Declaration, watch this 10 minute propaganda piece. While the US is not featured as a country in need, the ILO’s Constitution does state that all member states need to co-operate and use the Declaration; if they don’t, they harm other countries.)
Warriors, the elephant in the room is this: since the U.S. Constitution has been consistently ignored BEFORE the USMCA, and all that’s been shared in this series about the global overreaches, how MUCH of the Constitution will even still be honored?!
The ILO And World Economic Forum Davos’s Recent Meeting:
Yes, Warriors, the ILO was a big player in the World Economic Forum (WEF) Conference. We know that the President attended. However, pushing global workforce for America, was Ivanka Trump. Her plans for the US are a bit chilling. Her ‘vision’ includes using massive amounts of ‘big data’ to play matchmaker between the employer and the ‘qualified’ worker.
Before the WEF Conference, Ivanka Trump was a featured speaker at the CES (Consumer Electronics Show). While she talked about the importance of private industry partnering with the government in re-skilling and up-skilling Americans, the elephant in this room is that there should be no P3s in workforce based education. Public private partnerships completely bypass the U. S. Constitution and mute We the People! Think of it this way, if it’s not the government herding us around, it’s going to be private industry.
Here’s another truthful piece of evidence to support this, in the ITC document (for what the USMCA will do for America’s economy), under Article 19.16, the companies with the most capability to profit off the USMCA include Google, Amazon, and Facebook. If you enlarge the screenshot below, you’ll see two of them.
However, as we know, the CCSS Machine’s data mining (aka student data rape) arms are many. Some of those groups are featured below, too.
From another WEF attendee, IBM, their list of the 22 jobs most in danger. Look how many are skill based.
From the US ITC’s document, the 5 classes of workers (caste system):
Warriors, under the USMCA, many Americans will lose jobs in the auto industry, fishing industries, and, the timber industries. Agriculture jobs will be hit hard as well.
The ITC document states that only 176,000 jobs will be the expected growth. Of those, 124,000 will be in the service sector of that number, 50,000 in manufacturing and 2,000 in food/agriculture. The lion’s share of skilled workers will be in data transfer. Does this match the supposed millions of jobs Ivanka Trump keeps boasting about? Does this sound like a positive growth step for America in its economy? Do we realize just how much the loss of entire industries will throw us into mass chaos?
Related Resources:
1) In the 10 minutes ILO video, a program called STED was mentioned. Here’s the 133 page 2012 document. STED stands for‘Skills for Trade and Economic Diversification’.
2) From 2017, the WTO (World Trade Organization) publication on Investing in Skills for Inclusion. The United States is embedded 18 times in this document. Some even tie Mexico and the US as trade partners. In at least one of the sources cited in this document is US educational attainment and the economy.
3) The EuroNews interview with the ILO General, Guy Rider shared how inequality in work and wages is a global hot button. If you’d like to see other global employer hype from the Davos meeting from the ILO, go here.
4) To see the other WEF re-skill and skill based labor training (aka ‘education’), go here. Be sure to look for the ‘soft skills’ connection to a skilled labor force. “Soft skills” are code for Social Emotional Learning (SEL).
5) From 2015, here on my blog, I gave you a pair of articles about the push at that time for ‘upskilling’ America. Ivanka used that term in some of her recent speeches.
Closing:
Warriors, in my upcoming closing installment for the “Crushing Blow” series, I’ll be sharing if there’s any recourse for us, as a free citizenry. If you didn’t know it, the USMCA is supposed to be active for the next 16 years. That’s the year 2036. As one of my radio hosts said, ‘I don’t believe America will last 16 years of this.’
Crushing Blow, Part One
Crushing Blow, Part Two
Article posted with permission from Lynne Taylor


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--California Wants To Treat 19-Year-Old Criminals As Children

San Francisco and Los Angeles are turning into unlivable hellholes .
California is due to lose a House seat as people flee the state .
But the pro-crime lobby never rests .
Here ’ s its latest “ criminal justice reform ” gimmick .
Trying 19-year-old criminals as children .
New Bill Would Make 18- and 19-Year-Olds Juveniles Under California Law Spearheaded by state Senator Nancy Skinner ( D-Berkeley ) , SB-889 hopes to reclassify 18- and 19-year-old Californians as juveniles or “ emerging adults ” in the state ’ s criminal system , allowing them to receive support from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reclassify lefties as “ emerging disasters ” ?
“ When teenagers make serious mistakes and commit crimes , state prison is not the answer , ” Skinner said in a statement .
“ Processing teenagers through the juvenile justice system will help ensure they receive the appropriate education , counseling , treatment , and rehabilitation services necessary to achieve real public safety outcomes.
” According to the Sacramento Bee , Skinner and her office made it a point to mention that the brains of 18- and 19-year-olds aren ’ t fully developed during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Nancy Skinner is 65 years old .
Her brain is clearly not fully developed either .
But after this , the next frontier will be reclassifying 25-year-olds as “ emerging adults ” whose brains aren ’ t fully developed yet .
The proof is that they tend to vote for Democrats .
So the good news is that California ’ s next 19-year-old crack dealer who shoots a 4-year-old during a gang violence incident will be treated as a juvenile and kept out of “ state prison ” .
Brendon Woods , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also in favor of the bill , saying “ when a young person gets in trouble , they need our help , they don ’ t need to be locked in a cage.
” Does anyone need to be locked in a cage ?
The rapists need hugs and kisses .
And the murderers and muggers too .
And they all need to be transported to Sacramento , along with every social welfare cretin and Bernie Sanders supporter , and a loving wall built around the place while the Barney theme song is @ @ @

San Francisco and Los Angeles are turning into unlivable hellholes. California is due to lose a House seat as people flee the state. But the pro-crime lobby never rests. Here’s its latest “criminal justice reform” gimmick. Trying 19-year-old criminals as children.
New Bill Would Make 18- and 19-Year-Olds Juveniles Under California Law
Spearheaded by state Senator Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), SB-889 hopes to reclassify 18- and 19-year-old Californians as juveniles or “emerging adults” in the state’s criminal system, allowing them to receive support from more appropriate youth-focused services.
Can we reclassify lefties as “emerging disasters”?
“When teenagers make serious mistakes and commit crimes, state prison is not the answer,” Skinner said in a statement. “Processing teenagers through the juvenile justice system will help ensure they receive the appropriate education, counseling, treatment, and rehabilitation services necessary to achieve real public safety outcomes.”
According to the Sacramento Bee, Skinner and her office made it a point to mention that the brains of 18- and 19-year-olds aren’t fully developed during the legislation’s announcement last Friday.
Nancy Skinner is 65 years old. Her brain is clearly not fully developed either.
But after this, the next frontier will be reclassifying 25-year-olds as “emerging adults” whose brains aren’t fully developed yet. The proof is that they tend to vote for Democrats.
So the good news is that California’s next 19-year-old crack dealer who shoots a 4-year-old during a gang violence incident will be treated as a juvenile and kept out of “state prison”.
Brendon Woods, an Alameda County public defender, is also in favor of the bill, saying “when a young person gets in trouble, they need our help, they don’t need to be locked in a cage.”
Does anyone need to be locked in a cage? The rapists need hugs and kisses. And the murderers and muggers too. And they all need to be transported to Sacramento, along with every social welfare cretin and Bernie Sanders supporter, and a loving wall built around the place while the Barney theme song is piped in.
I predict good things.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--“No Billionaires!”:  Iowa Feels The Bern

“No Billionaires!”:  Iowa Feels The Bern

How is it that a communist , for all practical purposes , is winning in the Iowa caucuses at present ?
If there is anything that history shows repeatedly , it is that socialism , including its more violent form , communism , is an utter failure by every criterion imaginable .
And yet , as of this writing , Bernie Sanders , Democratic presidential candidate and an out-of-the-closet socialist , is leading in Iowa .
As The New York Times ( Jan. 26 ) notes : “ Senator Bernie Sanders has opened up a lead in Iowa just over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consolidating support from liberals and benefiting from divisions among more moderate presidential candidates who are clustered behind him , according to a New York Times/Siena College poll of likely caucusgoers.
” Bernie Sanders is what you could call a limousine liberal or a sofa socialist .
One writer uses the phrase , “ champagne socialist.
” That writer is Dr. Paul Kengor , a professor of history and political science at Grove City College and a bestselling author .
Many of his books focus on communism .
After the Soviet Union imploded in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s formerly classified documents were eventually released .
Kengor took the time to study those documents and has produced books from those studies .
One of those books , “ Dupes , ” shows how liberals in the West , including America , fell for the Communists ’ lies .
Recently , I interviewed Kengor ( again ) on my radio show to discuss an article he wrote in the American Spectator , called “ Bernie ’ s Billionaires.
” He notes that Fidel Castro was one of Sanders ’ models .
Bernie @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – during the heyday of the Soviet Union .
He claims that we have no need for billionaires , saying , “ Billionaires should not exist.
” Kengor told me that if you see a bumper sticker declaring “ No Billionaires , ” it comes from the Bernie Sanders for President campaign .
In his article on Sanders and billionaires , Kengor wrote of one of Bernie ’ s heroes , “ [ Fidel ] Castro , for the record , was much more than a millionaire .
In 2006 , Forbes magazine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million and rising .
… And yet , all Cuban workers – from doctors to teachers , baseball players , dentists , farmers , janitors – subsisted at a mandated ‘ living wage ’ of $ 1,200 per year , while the Castro brothers and a close-knit band of apparatchiks literally owned the island.
” Kengor adds , “ Yes , American progressives and Occupy Wall Street maniacs , if you want to see a society of true 1-percenters , with an income gap that would make you cry into your Starbucks cup @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There , 99 percent of the masses make the same poverty wage , while 1 percent confiscate wealth and property .
But hey , at least the serfs have ‘ free ’ education and health care !
That ’ s the ridiculous retort of the American Left , including Bernie Sanders.
” Kengor notes that Sanders is no pauper – owning at least $ 2 million dollars ’ worth of real estate in a Vermont beachfront home on the Champlain Islands ( which Kengor calls “ Bernie ’ s dacha on the Black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Burlington , Vermont , and a half-million dollar row house in D.C. : “ Stumping for socialism seems a pretty lucrative deal.
” And yet , many in our society like his type of message ( and that of Elizabeth Warren ) .
A Harris Poll last year found that among young people born after 1980 : • 73 % believe that government should provide universal health care ; • 67 % believe that government should provide tuition-free college ; and Some people argue the Bible teaches socialism .
It does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voluntary ( not coercive ) .
Socialism is a form of theft – theft by the government .
Socialism stokes the flames of envy and covetousness .
Socialism violates at least two of the Ten Commandments : Thou shalt not steal and Thou shalt not covet .
Gary Bauer , the head of American Values , told me in an interview for Christian television that it gets back to our education system : “ The majority of students that are saying that socialism is a good thing , have not been educated in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ socialism is ; and the reverse of that coin is they don ’ t know what free markets and free enterprise are , they think that it ’ s exploitative , that it causes poverty .
When , in fact , all over the world and throughout history , if young people were just being taught reality , they would know that socialism never works.
” Historians Eugene Genovese and his wife , Elizabeth Fox-Genovese , once published the Marxist Perspectives magazine , but then became disillusioned by communism .
They told the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) after the Soviet Union went kaput : “ When it all collapsed , the question was , after 70 years , what do we have to show for it ?
… tens of millions of corpses.
” I hope more Americans will learn from history and not fall for the pied pipers of socialism .

How is it that a communist, for all practical purposes, is winning in the Iowa caucuses at present? If there is anything that history shows repeatedly, it is that socialism, including its more violent form, communism, is an utter failure by every criterion imaginable.
And yet, as of this writing, Bernie Sanders, Democratic presidential candidate and an out-of-the-closet socialist, is leading in Iowa.
As The New York Times (Jan. 26) notes: “Senator Bernie Sanders has opened up a lead in Iowa just over a week before the Democratic caucuses, consolidating support from liberals and benefiting from divisions among more moderate presidential candidates who are clustered behind him, according to a New York Times/Siena College poll of likely caucusgoers.”
Bernie Sanders is what you could call a limousine liberal or a sofa socialist. One writer uses the phrase, “champagne socialist.”
That writer is Dr. Paul Kengor, a professor of history and political science at Grove City College and a bestselling author. Many of his books focus on communism. After the Soviet Union imploded in the early 1990s, the nation’s formerly classified documents were eventually released.
Kengor took the time to study those documents and has produced books from those studies. One of those books, “Dupes,” shows how liberals in the West, including America, fell for the Communists’ lies.
Recently, I interviewed Kengor (again) on my radio show to discuss an article he wrote in the American Spectator, called “Bernie’s Billionaires.” He notes that Fidel Castro was one of Sanders’ models.
Bernie Sanders famously spent his honeymoon in Russia – during the heyday of the Soviet Union. He claims that we have no need for billionaires, saying, “Billionaires should not exist.”
Kengor told me that if you see a bumper sticker declaring “No Billionaires,” it comes from the Bernie Sanders for President campaign.
In his article on Sanders and billionaires, Kengor wrote of one of Bernie’s heroes, “[Fidel] Castro, for the record, was much more than a millionaire. In 2006, Forbes magazine estimated his net worth at $900 million and rising. … And yet, all Cuban workers – from doctors to teachers, baseball players, dentists, farmers, janitors – subsisted at a mandated ‘living wage’ of $1,200 per year, while the Castro brothers and a close-knit band of apparatchiks literally owned the island.”
Kengor adds, “Yes, American progressives and Occupy Wall Street maniacs, if you want to see a society of true 1-percenters, with an income gap that would make you cry into your Starbucks cup, go to a Marxist country. There, 99 percent of the masses make the same poverty wage, while 1 percent confiscate wealth and property. But hey, at least the serfs have ‘free’ education and health care! That’s the ridiculous retort of the American Left, including Bernie Sanders.”
Kengor notes that Sanders is no pauper – owning at least $2 million dollars’ worth of real estate in a Vermont beachfront home on the Champlain Islands (which Kengor calls “Bernie’s dacha on the Black Sea”), a colonial home in Burlington, Vermont, and a half-million dollar row house in D.C.: “Stumping for socialism seems a pretty lucrative deal.”
And yet, many in our society like his type of message (and that of Elizabeth Warren). A Harris Poll last year found that among young people born after 1980:
73% believe that government should provide universal health care;
67% believe that government should provide tuition-free college; and
49% prefer living in a socialist country.
Yipes.
Some people argue the Bible teaches socialism. It does not. It teaches charity, which is voluntary (not coercive). Socialism is a form of theft – theft by the government. Socialism stokes the flames of envy and covetousness. Socialism violates at least two of the Ten Commandments: Thou shalt not steal and Thou shalt not covet.
Gary Bauer, the head of American Values, told me in an interview for Christian television that it gets back to our education system:
“The majority of students that are saying that socialism is a good thing, have not been educated in any way shape or form about what socialism is; and the reverse of that coin is they don’t know what free markets and free enterprise are, they think that it’s exploitative, that it causes poverty. When, in fact, all over the world and throughout history, if young people were just being taught reality, they would know that socialism never works.”
Historians Eugene Genovese and his wife, Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, once published the Marxist Perspectives magazine, but then became disillusioned by communism. They told the National Review (Feb. 24, 1997) after the Soviet Union went kaput: “When it all collapsed, the question was, after 70 years, what do we have to show for it? … tens of millions of corpses.”
I hope more Americans will learn from history and not fall for the pied pipers of socialism.
Article posted with permission from Jerry Newcombe


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--Why Are People Supportive Of Government-Controlled Murder?

It is almost incomprehensible that the massive murdering of babies in the womb is still a controversial issue .
Murder is murder at any age and any time after conception .
And , with the erroneous thinking of some citizens that a Supreme Court decision is law , the murdering of the helpless innocents has and is expanding to include older individuals with health issues under the false guise of euthanasia or medically assisted suicide .
Four States in the united States of America already have pseudo-legislation addressing government-sanctioned murder by physician with the numbers expected to grow as this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is such a disconnect in the thinking process of some individuals that actually believe one can assist someone in committing suicide and it not be classified as murder .
I can only assume their thinking revolves around government enacting some type of legislation that declares helping someone kill themselves under strict regulations is not murder but assisting the individual to commit suicide .
There are several articles this writer penned on the farce of government-sanctioned murder by physician at Sons of Liberty Media .
I can ’ t help but conclude this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the terminally ill or mentally ill adults , teens and children has come from the mantra “ my body , my choice ” chanted by women who have their unborn , nearly born or newly born murdered and supporters of such atrocity .
And yes , Canada is including teens and children in this government-sanctioned murder by physician it terms euthanasia or medically assisted suicide or medical assistance in dying .
Murder is defined as the crime of unlawfully killing a person with malice aforethought .
Homicide is defined as death at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are murders ; but all murders are homicides .
And , the definition of person is an individual human being – man , woman or child .
Let ’ s start with the mantra “ my body , my choice ” as a fallacious argument to murdering one ’ s own unborn child .
Women and supporters using this mantra to justify their unlawful killing of an unborn child consider that child part of their body .
Unfortunately , this is not true .
The uterus is a vessel inside a woman that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it can survive outside the vessel .
The child inside the uterus has separate , specific DNA from the woman , can have a different blood type , be a different sex , can feel pain , and even suck its thumb while engaging in movement and respiratory cycles independent from the woman .
This is not a kidney , pancreas or other bodily organ ; it ’ s a separate “ person ” from the woman .
The uterus is the reproductive organ of the woman , but what is inside the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ woman .
When a woman hires a physician to murder her unborn child , she is engaging in a murder-for-hire scenario where the physician is the murderer and she an accomplice .
Yes , it is murder as defined .
It is not a part of her body that she is damaging or hurting or having removed because of disease or illness .
This is a separate individual , a person , that is being damaged , hurt and killed .
Moreover , she is not the one committing the actual act but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ How physicians who participate in this murder can justify their actions knowing through extensive education this is a separate individual , a person , is beyond me .
With the advancements made in medical science , the fallacy of murdering the baby to save the life of the mother is a tactic to justify murdering one patient instead of caring for two .
The physicians have a conundrum when the mother suffers a complication during childbirth that ultimately takes her life , but they rush to save the baby and the mother .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ still occur .
Why not let the baby die with the mother , if that is the ultimate outcome ?
If it ’ s acceptable for physicians to view the woman as the only patient in order to murder an unborn , nearly born or newly born infant , why is the above scenario different ?
Only physicians can answer that , but the correct answer is there is no difference .
The physician is dealing with two separate individuals , persons , that require care .
One is not more important than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ child is not viewed as a part of the woman ’ s body .
So , the medical profession has plenty of hypocrisy to go around and solve .
No one forces a physician to engage in the murder-for hire scenario of murdering babies in the womb .
Government doesn ’ t put a gun to their head , nor does the woman hiring those services .
Physicians do it by choice using no scientific or medical information learned through years of education .
Nurses , you are not off the hook either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ask yourself this question .
If murdering of babies in the womb was made “ legal ” by a Supreme Court decision , which it was not since courts can not make law , why are States enacting laws on murdering babies in the womb , babies being born , and newly born babies ?
It wasn ’ t legal and everyone knows it – it was and still is murder .
Hitler made murdering individuals with mental illness , physical disabilities , and genetic disorders law .
Did that suddenly condone murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the people of Germany were appalled at this action and the world condemned it .
Why now are people applauding the murder of individuals by physician when having genetic disorders , mental illness or physical disabilities under the guise of “ euthanasia ” ?
Does anyone find it odd that the same individuals who condemn the death penalty as “ cruel and unusual punishment ” , which it isn ’ t since God declares the penalty of death for certain crimes , applaud death through lethal injection administered by a physician for certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medical care ” ?
I certainly do .
And , these people have a host of justifications to go along with government-sanctioned murder by physician .
The definition of suicide is death by one ’ s own hand .
When involving another , that death ceases to be suicide .
But , the justification for helping someone end their own life begins .
It ’ s acceptable because it is “ regulated ” by government .
Or , it allows a person to die with dignity .
Or , a person can choose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become a burden to family because of a terminal illness .
Or , it ’ s more comfortable for that person because they won ’ t have to suffer .
And , the list goes on .
But , these are fallacies .
Let ’ s talk about government-sanctioned murder by physician using lethal injections or cocktails as easing suffering .
Back in December of 2019 , it was reported experiments were being performed on individuals elected to have physicians murder them with different drug combinations to find an effective lethal drug .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ used resulted in painful deaths that lasted for hours in some cases .
The same lethal drugs are used in capital punishments that are used for government-sanctioned murder by physician .
Let that sink in for a moment .
Some individuals opting for murder by physician using one combination were screaming in pain as the mixture burned their mouth .
Other mixtures stretched out the death process to hours , in some cases 31 hours .
In the latest round of testing of lethal drugs , some individuals couldn ’ t swallow effectively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” dosing .
Others emerged from the coma induced by the drugs and some even sitting up during the dying process .
Some deaths took as long as seven days .
Yeah , one can see how this would be much more comfortable .
None of this sounds like dying with dignity or alleviating suffering .
It sounds cruel and inhumane .
But , it is “ regulated ” by government using specific criteria .
That should make one feel better – Not !
It ’ s so “ regulated ” by government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use is still under “ research ” and individuals are being used as guinea pigs to find the right combination .
If people are fearful about pain and suffering during the end stages of terminal illness or other illnesses/diseases , it ’ s difficult to see how dying using drugs that can produce great suffering quells that fear .
Surely , those who support this atrocity and who want physicians to murder them are aware of all this .
Wan na bet they don ’ t ?
Who would consent knowing that ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of individuals with terminal conditions by governments pushes this solution in Canada for organ donation .
In other words , the push for government-sanctioned murder by physician is more about obtaining organs than easing the individual through a natural dying process .
One has to wonder if that is happening here in the USA where five States now have passed the legalization of physician murder disguised as “ physician assisted suicide ” .
If someone assists another to kill him- or herself , it is no longer suicide , but homicide and murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get around it .
What about individuals suffering from Alzheimer ’ s or some type of dementia , organic brain disease that affects memory ?
If these individuals consent while lucid , what happens when confusion sets in and they don ’ t remember ?
Canada solved that conundrum by holding steadfast the consent holds in place .
While Canada did include a 10-day waiting period between consent and physician murder of the individual , a doctor or nurse can waive that period .
And , once that individual consents , there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
Imagine the fear and panic of those individuals being government-sanctioned murdered by physician when in the confused state of their disease .
Doesn ’ t sound dignified to me .
Can anyone see the disconnect ?
People who condemn capital punishment using lethal drugs champion the use of these same drugs for government-sanctioned physician murder .
One is described as “ cruel and unusual punishment ” while the other is described as relieving suffering .
Of course , the argument comes in that individuals should be able to decide when to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illness .
And , they do without government involvement – it ’ s called suicide .
The only reason to involve a physician is because they have not the courage to do it .
Remember , physicians can not dispense the drugs ; they only prescribe them .
It takes a pharmacist to dispense the drug combinations so this involves more than physician and patient .
Just because government enacts a law making something legal , does not mean it is lawful under natural law .
Again , just as with murdering of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incomprehensible that physicians would even participate in something like this .
Physicians have plenty of disconnect weaving through their profession or they have a tremendous amount of hypocrisy .
Helping someone manage and navigate a terminal illness or disease does not mean to participate in murder .
Moreover , a piece of government legislation doesn ’ t negate ethics .
Government is now legislating who can be murdered and who can do the murdering with impunity .
As long as the criteria is met , anyone at any age can be murdered by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can live and who can not , what is to prevent government from adding criteria on demographics or non-terminal illnesses/diseases that are heavily utilizing health care services ?
Who is willing to give government such authority ?
The Constitution does not give government that authority and God certainly hasn ’ t .
It ’ s amazing how many people are willing to allow government to be involved in such .
Let ’ s put it in this context .
People are appalled when police officers enter the wrong home in no-knock raids and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the agency investigates itself and issues a statement it was acceptable .
Government stated it was okay so the officers are cleared with impunity .
So , why the outrage ?
Don ’ t get me wrong .
The police officers were wrong , should not have been there , should not have conducted a no-knock raid and definitely should be held accountable for the individual ’ s murder .
Why can ’ t people see that just because government said it was okay and acceptable doesn ’ t mean it is ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ some physicians think murdering a patient with a debilitating or terminal illness is okay , doesn ’ t mean it is .
Finally , no one has the right to infringe on the skills of someone else to engage in what is considered a crime .
There is no medical assistance in dying – it ’ s called medical murder .
There is no physician assisted suicide – it ’ s murder by physician .
Plain and simple .
It ’ s a shame some are willing to drink the Kool-aid to support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Sons Of Liberty Media

It is almost incomprehensible that the massive murdering of babies in the womb is still a controversial issue. Murder is murder at any age and any time after conception. And, with the erroneous thinking of some citizens that a Supreme Court decision is law, the murdering of the helpless innocents has and is expanding to include older individuals with health issues under the false guise of euthanasia or medically assisted suicide. Four States in the united States of America already have pseudo-legislation addressing government-sanctioned murder by physician with the numbers expected to grow as this abomination gains popularity among the braindead. There is such a disconnect in the thinking process of some individuals that actually believe one can assist someone in committing suicide and it not be classified as murder. I can only assume their thinking revolves around government enacting some type of legislation that declares helping someone kill themselves under strict regulations is not murder but assisting the individual to commit suicide. There are several articles this writer penned on the farce of government-sanctioned murder by physician at Sons of Liberty Media.
I can’t help but conclude this move toward government-sanctioned murder by physician for the terminally ill or mentally ill adults, teens and children has come from the mantra “my body, my choice” chanted by women who have their unborn, nearly born or newly born murdered and supporters of such atrocity. And yes, Canada is including teens and children in this government-sanctioned murder by physician it terms euthanasia or medically assisted suicide or medical assistance in dying. Murder is defined as the crime of unlawfully killing a person with malice aforethought. Homicide is defined as death at the hands of another. Not all homicides are murders; but all murders are homicides. And, the definition of person is an individual human being – man, woman or child.
Let’s start with the mantra “my body, my choice” as a fallacious argument to murdering one’s own unborn child. Women and supporters using this mantra to justify their unlawful killing of an unborn child consider that child part of their body. Unfortunately, this is not true. The uterus is a vessel inside a woman that nurtures a separate individual human being until it can survive outside the vessel. The child inside the uterus has separate, specific DNA from the woman, can have a different blood type, be a different sex, can feel pain, and even suck its thumb while engaging in movement and respiratory cycles independent from the woman. This is not a kidney, pancreas or other bodily organ; it’s a separate “person” from the woman. The uterus is the reproductive organ of the woman, but what is inside the uterus is not a part of the woman.
When a woman hires a physician to murder her unborn child, she is engaging in a murder-for-hire scenario where the physician is the murderer and she an accomplice. Yes, it is murder as defined. It is not a part of her body that she is damaging or hurting or having removed because of disease or illness. This is a separate individual, a person, that is being damaged, hurt and killed. Moreover, she is not the one committing the actual act but allowing another to commit the act. How physicians who participate in this murder can justify their actions knowing through extensive education this is a separate individual, a person, is beyond me. With the advancements made in medical science, the fallacy of murdering the baby to save the life of the mother is a tactic to justify murdering one patient instead of caring for two.
The physicians have a conundrum when the mother suffers a complication during childbirth that ultimately takes her life, but they rush to save the baby and the mother. While it is rare, these incidents still occur. Why not let the baby die with the mother, if that is the ultimate outcome? If it’s acceptable for physicians to view the woman as the only patient in order to murder an unborn, nearly born or newly born infant, why is the above scenario different? Only physicians can answer that, but the correct answer is there is no difference. The physician is dealing with two separate individuals, persons, that require care. One is not more important than the other. And, the unborn child is not viewed as a part of the woman’s body. So, the medical profession has plenty of hypocrisy to go around and solve.
No one forces a physician to engage in the murder-for hire scenario of murdering babies in the womb. Government doesn’t put a gun to their head, nor does the woman hiring those services. Physicians do it by choice using no scientific or medical information learned through years of education. Nurses, you are not off the hook either because you know better as well.
Ask yourself this question. If murdering of babies in the womb was made “legal” by a Supreme Court decision, which it was not since courts cannot make law, why are States enacting laws on murdering babies in the womb, babies being born, and newly born babies? It wasn’t legal and everyone knows it – it was and still is murder.
Hitler made murdering individuals with mental illness, physical disabilities, and genetic disorders law. Did that suddenly condone murder? Answer honestly because history tells us the people of Germany were appalled at this action and the world condemned it. Why now are people applauding the murder of individuals by physician when having genetic disorders, mental illness or physical disabilities under the guise of “euthanasia”?
Does anyone find it odd that the same individuals who condemn the death penalty as “cruel and unusual punishment”, which it isn’t since God declares the penalty of death for certain crimes, applaud death through lethal injection administered by a physician for certain medical conditions as an “advancement in medical care”? I certainly do. And, these people have a host of justifications to go along with government-sanctioned murder by physician.
The definition of suicide is death by one’s own hand. When involving another, that death ceases to be suicide. But, the justification for helping someone end their own life begins. It’s acceptable because it is “regulated” by government. Or, it allows a person to die with dignity. Or, a person can choose when to end their life before they become a burden to family because of a terminal illness. Or, it’s more comfortable for that person because they won’t have to suffer. And, the list goes on. But, these are fallacies.
Let’s talk about government-sanctioned murder by physician using lethal injections or cocktails as easing suffering. Back in December of 2019, it was reported experiments were being performed on individuals elected to have physicians murder them with different drug combinations to find an effective lethal drug. This report indicated that current drug cocktails used resulted in painful deaths that lasted for hours in some cases. The same lethal drugs are used in capital punishments that are used for government-sanctioned murder by physician. Let that sink in for a moment.
Some individuals opting for murder by physician using one combination were screaming in pain as the mixture burned their mouth. Other mixtures stretched out the death process to hours, in some cases 31 hours. In the latest round of testing of lethal drugs, some individuals couldn’t swallow effectively and some vomited, preventing “proper” dosing. Others emerged from the coma induced by the drugs and some even sitting up during the dying process. Some deaths took as long as seven days. Yeah, one can see how this would be much more comfortable.
None of this sounds like dying with dignity or alleviating suffering. It sounds cruel and inhumane. But, it is “regulated” by government using specific criteria. That should make one feel better – Not! It’s so “regulated” by government the exact combination of lethal drugs to use is still under “research” and individuals are being used as guinea pigs to find the right combination. If people are fearful about pain and suffering during the end stages of terminal illness or other illnesses/diseases, it’s difficult to see how dying using drugs that can produce great suffering quells that fear. Surely, those who support this atrocity and who want physicians to murder them are aware of all this. Wanna bet they don’t? Who would consent knowing that?
The “regulation” of physician murder of individuals with terminal conditions by governments pushes this solution in Canada for organ donation. In other words, the push for government-sanctioned murder by physician is more about obtaining organs than easing the individual through a natural dying process. One has to wonder if that is happening here in the USA where five States now have passed the legalization of physician murder disguised as “physician assisted suicide”.
If someone assists another to kill him- or herself, it is no longer suicide, but homicide and murder. No fancy, fluffy language can get around it.
What about individuals suffering from Alzheimer’s or some type of dementia, organic brain disease that affects memory? If these individuals consent while lucid, what happens when confusion sets in and they don’t remember? Canada solved that conundrum by holding steadfast the consent holds in place. While Canada did include a 10-day waiting period between consent and physician murder of the individual, a doctor or nurse can waive that period. And, once that individual consents, there is nothing the family can do to counter it. Imagine the fear and panic of those individuals being government-sanctioned murdered by physician when in the confused state of their disease. Doesn’t sound dignified to me.
Can anyone see the disconnect? People who condemn capital punishment using lethal drugs champion the use of these same drugs for government-sanctioned physician murder. One is described as “cruel and unusual punishment” while the other is described as relieving suffering.
Of course, the argument comes in that individuals should be able to decide when to end their life when having a terminal illness. And, they do without government involvement – it’s called suicide. The only reason to involve a physician is because they have not the courage to do it. Remember, physicians cannot dispense the drugs; they only prescribe them. It takes a pharmacist to dispense the drug combinations so this involves more than physician and patient.
Just because government enacts a law making something legal, does not mean it is lawful under natural law.
Again, just as with murdering of babies in the womb, it is incomprehensible that physicians would even participate in something like this. Physicians have plenty of disconnect weaving through their profession or they have a tremendous amount of hypocrisy. Helping someone manage and navigate a terminal illness or disease does not mean to participate in murder. Moreover, a piece of government legislation doesn’t negate ethics.
Government is now legislating who can be murdered and who can do the murdering with impunity. As long as the criteria is met, anyone at any age can be murdered by physician. Once government can regulate who can live and who cannot, what is to prevent government from adding criteria on demographics or non-terminal illnesses/diseases that are heavily utilizing health care services? Who is willing to give government such authority? The Constitution does not give government that authority and God certainly hasn’t. It’s amazing how many people are willing to allow government to be involved in such.
Let’s put it in this context. People are appalled when police officers enter the wrong home in no-knock raids and murders an individual in that home then the agency investigates itself and issues a statement it was acceptable. Government stated it was okay so the officers are cleared with impunity. So, why the outrage? Don’t get me wrong. The police officers were wrong, should not have been there, should not have conducted a no-knock raid and definitely should be held accountable for the individual’s murder. Why can’t people see that just because government said it was okay and acceptable doesn’t mean it is? By the same token, just because some physicians think murdering a patient with a debilitating or terminal illness is okay, doesn’t mean it is.
Finally, no one has the right to infringe on the skills of someone else to engage in what is considered a crime. There is no medical assistance in dying – it’s called medical murder. There is no physician assisted suicide – it’s murder by physician. Plain and simple. It’s a shame some are willing to drink the Kool-aid to support such atrocity.
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--Maryland:  Cop Charged With Murder For Shooting & Killing Handcuffed Man Seat Belted In His Police C

Maryland:  Cop Charged With Murder For Shooting & Killing Handcuffed Man Seat Belted In His Police Cruiser

Temple Hills , MD — In 2018 , Sarah Wilson allegedly grabbed a gun and shot herself in the head while handcuffed in the back of a police cruiser .
Her death was ruled a suicide .
Victor White III , 22 , was handcuffed in the back of a police cruiser in Louisiana and also allegedly grabbed a gun and shot himself in the back of a police cruiser .
Like Wilson , his death was also ruled a suicide .
Now , another man has been killed while handcuffed inside a police cruiser .
This time , however @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being ruled a suicide as the man was shot seven times by the officer ’ s service weapon .
On Tuesday , Prince George ’ s County Police Chief Hank Stawinski announced murder , manslaughter , assault and weapons charges at a press conference .
Cpl .
Michael Owen Jr. , a 10-year force veteran , allegedly shot the man , William Green , 43 , of Washington , D.C. , seven times .
“ I have concluded that what happened last night is a crime , ” Stawinski said .
There was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ events , he said .
According to police , on Monday night , Prince George ’ s County police officers responded to reports that a driver had struck multiple vehicles .
When they arrived on the scene , they found the driver , William Green .
Temple Hills community , spokeswoman Christina Cotterman said the officers told her they believed the man was high on PCP because they could smell it .
While PCP does reportedly have an odor similar to magic markers , police claiming that a man was high on it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ irresponsible at best and deliberately misleading at worst .
But there are other details to this story that paint an extremely sketchy picture .
For starters , police were able to get the driver handcuffed without incident .
We can deduce that it was without incident because officers claim they placed the Green in the front seat of the police cruiser after they handcuffed him .
Yes , you read that correctly .
Officials told the media that it is normal for Prince George ’ s County police officers to place suspects in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Based on the thousands of police stories TFTP has reported over the years , the idea that it is department policy to allow suspects allegedly high on PCP to ride in the front seat of a police cruiser — handcuffed or not — is unbelievable , as in , we don ’ t believe it .
TFTP has reported on incidents of police officers being arrested and asking to ride in the front seat to avoid embarrassment only to be denied by their arresting officers .
“ A short time later , for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the investigation , Green was shot seven times by the officer ’ s duty weapon , ” the statement says .
Originally , police claim that once the officer hopped into the front seat with Green that a struggle ensued .
Cotterman told reporters that police told her that “ two independent witnesses told police they either saw or heard a struggle , and heard loud bangs coming from the cruiser.
” During this alleged “ struggle ” the officer pulled his weapon and fired multiple rounds into the handcuffed man who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the police cruiser who could not have possibly been a threat .
Adding to the suspect nature of this shooting is the fact that the officer was not wearing a body camera so none of the incident was captured on video .
According to Cotterman , police are now conducting an investigation into the shooting and looking at nearby residences and businesses to see if any of the shooting was captured on surveillance footage .
“ Once again , a Black man – William Green – has been killed needlessly by officers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Police Department , ” reads a statement attributed to Deborah Jeon , the legal director for the ACLU of Maryland .
“ Once again , reports indicate that the unarmed man was in a disoriented state when he was shot and killed – after he was handcuffed and put into the patrol car .
The police put Mr. Green in the front seat of the patrol car , next to the officer , who then shot Mr. Green multiple times at close range.
” The ACLU then criticized the fact that there was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is reportedly no body camera footage that the man ’ s family and the community can use to assess the truth of PGPD ’ s claims .
And there is good reason to question them .
”

Temple Hills, MD — In 2018, Sarah Wilson allegedly grabbed a gun and shot herself in the head while handcuffed in the back of a police cruiser. Her death was ruled a suicide. Victor White III, 22, was handcuffed in the back of a police cruiser in Louisiana and also allegedly grabbed a gun and shot himself in the back of a police cruiser. Like Wilson, his death was also ruled a suicide. Now, another man has been killed while handcuffed inside a police cruiser. This time, however, there is no chance of it being ruled a suicide as the man was shot seven times by the officer’s service weapon.
On Tuesday, Prince George’s County Police Chief Hank Stawinski announced murder, manslaughter, assault and weapons charges at a press conference. Cpl. Michael Owen Jr., a 10-year force veteran, allegedly shot the man, William Green , 43, of Washington, D.C., seven times.
“I have concluded that what happened last night is a crime,” Stawinski said. There was no “reasonable explanation” for the events, he said.
According to police, on Monday night, Prince George’s County police officers responded to reports that a driver had struck multiple vehicles. When they arrived on the scene, they found the driver, William Green. Temple Hills community, spokeswoman Christina Cotterman said the officers told her they believed the man was high on PCP because they could smell it.
While PCP does reportedly have an odor similar to magic markers, police claiming that a man was high on it without first conducting a toxicology exam is irresponsible at best and deliberately misleading at worst.
But there are other details to this story that paint an extremely sketchy picture. For starters, police were able to get the driver handcuffed without incident. We can deduce that it was without incident because officers claim they placed the Green in the front seat of the police cruiser after they handcuffed him.
Yes, you read that correctly. Officials told the media that it is normal for Prince George’s County police officers to place suspects in the front seats of their vehicles. Based on the thousands of police stories TFTP has reported over the years, the idea that it is department policy to allow suspects allegedly high on PCP to ride in the front seat of a police cruiser — handcuffed or not — is unbelievable, as in, we don’t believe it. TFTP has reported on incidents of police officers being arrested and asking to ride in the front seat to avoid embarrassment only to be denied by their arresting officers.
“A short time later, for reasons that are now at the center of the investigation, Green was shot seven times by the officer’s duty weapon,” the statement says.
Originally, police claim that once the officer hopped into the front seat with Green that a struggle ensued. Cotterman told reporters that police told her that “two independent witnesses told police they either saw or heard a struggle, and heard loud bangs coming from the cruiser.”
During this alleged “struggle” the officer pulled his weapon and fired multiple rounds into the handcuffed man who was seat belted into the front seat of the police cruiser who could not have possibly been a threat. Adding to the suspect nature of this shooting is the fact that the officer was not wearing a body camera so none of the incident was captured on video.
According to Cotterman, police are now conducting an investigation into the shooting and looking at nearby residences and businesses to see if any of the shooting was captured on surveillance footage.
“Once again, a Black man – William Green – has been killed needlessly by officers with the Prince George’s County Police Department,” reads a statement attributed to Deborah Jeon, the legal director for the ACLU of Maryland. “Once again, reports indicate that the unarmed man was in a disoriented state when he was shot and killed – after he was handcuffed and put into the patrol car. The police put Mr. Green in the front seat of the patrol car, next to the officer, who then shot Mr. Green multiple times at close range.”
The ACLU then criticized the fact that there was no video of the incident.
“There is reportedly no body camera footage that the man’s family and the community can use to assess the truth of PGPD’s claims. And there is good reason to question them.”
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist