thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-14--Tennessee:  74-Year-Old Grandmother Strip Searched In Public After Cops Claimed To Smell Weed

Jamestown , TN — A stop for an alleged traffic violation turned into a nightmare for a 74-year-old grandmother when the police officer conducting the stop claimed to have smelled a plant .
Because the police state claims the authority to violate innocent grandmothers over plant smells , the officers involved will face no punishment and now the taxpayers will be held liable instead .
Phyllis Tucker , 74 , is now suing the city of Jamestown and Fentress County , claiming the city police and county sheriff departments have illegal policies involving the use of strip searches , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporters that the incident which unfolded earlier this year has left her and her family traumatized , and rightfully so .
According to the lawsuit , Tucker was forced to pull down her pants and remove her bra in the parking lot of a fast food restaurant as bystanders watched .
“ If it wasn ’ t for my mother , I would never go back to Jamestown , never , and I wouldn ’ t advise anybody else to go through there either , ” Tucker said .
Tucker was visiting her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grandson , his girlfriend , and an infant in her car when a cop pulled them over and claimed to smell weed on her grandson ’ s girlfriend , Kira Smith , 19 .
Instead of simply letting this family go , who had harmed absolutely no one , the cop escalated the situation to what amounts to a public roadside sexual assault — all to search for a plant .
According to the lawsuit , officers from the Jamestown police and the Fentress County Sheriff ’ s Department strip searched the two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the suit , Smith was ordered to “ pull her pants down to her knees ” and Tucker was told to remove “ her blouse and bra ” “ exposing her breasts to the public.
” “ I just started crying and was humiliated .
I didn ’ t know if there was somebody who was going on the street that was seeing me with my top off , ” Tucker said .
The lawsuit states the forcing both men and women to strip on the side of the road is a common @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ It is the custom of Frentress County to conduct these type of strip searches , ” said attorney Wesley Clark who represents Tucker and Smith .
News Channel 5 reports that Clark also represents two other women who say there were pulled over in Fentress County in July , “ stripped completely nude and searched ” including being told to “ squat ” and “ cough ” while flashlights inspected their “ genital areas , ” according to the lawsuit .
In that case , officers found no drugs and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ improper tag.
” “ To argue that it ’ s appropriate to strip women naked on the side of a public highway in search of marijuana is completely insane , ” Clark said .
We agree .
Nevertheless , it continues to happen all across the country in spite of marijuana being legal in some form in over half the states .
Tucker explained to News Channel 5 that she tried to film the stop that night but the officers ordered her to stop , claiming they were getting it all on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said they requested the footage , but police only released a 7-minute clip from after the searches took place .
In this clip , however , you can hear the officer admit that she made Smith pull down her pants .
“ I ’ m just trying to do my job and it ’ s turned into this , ” the cop says , claiming that strip searching two women in public is a just act and it ’ s the women who are in the wrong and not him .
The officer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cavity search as which point Smith produced a tiny amount of weed and said , “ I ’ m sorry.
” The officer responds , “ Sorry doesn ’ t cut it .
Where did you have it ?
” The officer suggested that Smith had it in her waistline , but the female officer who conducted the search stops him , saying , “ No it was not .
It was in her underwear because I made her pull her … waistline down.
” Highlighting the pointlessness of this depraved act is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the two women were publicly strip searched so the cop could write a ticket .
Sick indeed .
“ I believe this case provides an example of the excesses of the war on drugs in America , ” Clark said .
“ The federal courts have been clear for many years on when it ’ s justifiable to conduct a strip search in public , and that ’ s pretty much never , ” Clark said .
“ What I would like is for this kind of thing to never happen to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ woman of any age , simply because you have shame and you don ’ t just get over it , ” Tucker said .

Jamestown, TN — A stop for an alleged traffic violation turned into a nightmare for a 74-year-old grandmother when the police officer conducting the stop claimed to have smelled a plant. Because the police state claims the authority to violate innocent grandmothers over plant smells, the officers involved will face no punishment and now the taxpayers will be held liable instead.
Phyllis Tucker, 74, is now suing the city of Jamestown and Fentress County, claiming the city police and county sheriff departments have illegal policies involving the use of strip searches, according to News Channel 5.
Tucker tells reporters that the incident which unfolded earlier this year has left her and her family traumatized, and rightfully so. According to the lawsuit, Tucker was forced to pull down her pants and remove her bra in the parking lot of a fast food restaurant as bystanders watched.
“If it wasn’t for my mother, I would never go back to Jamestown, never, and I wouldn’t advise anybody else to go through there either,” Tucker said.
Tucker was visiting her mother that night. She had her grandson, his girlfriend, and an infant in her car when a cop pulled them over and claimed to smell weed on her grandson’s girlfriend, Kira Smith, 19.
Instead of simply letting this family go, who had harmed absolutely no one, the cop escalated the situation to what amounts to a public roadside sexual assault — all to search for a plant.
According to the lawsuit, officers from the Jamestown police and the Fentress County Sheriff’s Department strip searched the two women in public view. According to the suit, Smith was ordered to “pull her pants down to her knees” and Tucker was told to remove “her blouse and bra” “exposing her breasts to the public.”
“I just started crying and was humiliated. I didn’t know if there was somebody who was going on the street that was seeing me with my top off,” Tucker said.
The lawsuit states the forcing both men and women to strip on the side of the road is a common practice by law enforcement in Frentress County.
“It is the custom of Frentress County to conduct these type of strip searches,” said attorney Wesley Clark who represents Tucker and Smith.
News Channel 5 reports that Clark also represents two other women who say there were pulled over in Fentress County in July, “stripped completely nude and searched” including being told to “squat” and “cough” while flashlights inspected their “genital areas,” according to the lawsuit.
In that case, officers found no drugs and the women left with a ticket for an “improper tag.”
“To argue that it’s appropriate to strip women naked on the side of a public highway in search of marijuana is completely insane,” Clark said.
We agree. Nevertheless, it continues to happen all across the country in spite of marijuana being legal in some form in over half the states.
Tucker explained to News Channel 5 that she tried to film the stop that night but the officers ordered her to stop, claiming they were getting it all on body camera footage. News Channel 5 said they requested the footage, but police only released a 7-minute clip from after the searches took place.
In this clip, however, you can hear the officer admit that she made Smith pull down her pants.
“I’m just trying to do my job and it’s turned into this,” the cop says, claiming that strip searching two women in public is a just act and it’s the women who are in the wrong and not him.
The officer begins threatening the women with a body cavity search as which point Smith produced a tiny amount of weed and said, “I’m sorry.”
The officer responds, “Sorry doesn’t cut it. Where did you have it?”
The officer suggested that Smith had it in her waistline, but the female officer who conducted the search stops him, saying, “No it was not. It was in her underwear because I made her pull her … waistline down.”
Highlighting the pointlessness of this depraved act is the fact that no arrests were made and the two women were publicly strip searched so the cop could write a ticket. Sick indeed.
“I believe this case provides an example of the excesses of the war on drugs in America,” Clark said.
“The federal courts have been clear for many years on when it’s justifiable to conduct a strip search in public, and that’s pretty much never,” Clark said.
“What I would like is for this kind of thing to never happen to another woman, a girl, a woman of any age, simply because you have shame and you don’t just get over it,” Tucker said.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-14--Debt is the Real Pandemic

Debt is the Real Pandemic

According to the Congressional Budget Office ’ s ( CBO ) latest “ Update on the Budget Outlook , ” this year ’ s $ 3.3 trillion federal deficit is not just three times larger than last year : it is the largest federal deficit in history .
The CBO update also predicts that the federal debt will equal 104 percent of the gross domestic product ( GDP ) next year and will reach 108 percent of GDP by 2030 .
The CBO update also shows that the Social Security , Medicare , and highway trust funds will all be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pressure on Congress to bail out the trust funds thus further increasing the debt .
This year ’ s spike in federal spending was caused by the multi-trillion dollar coronavirus relief/economic stimulus bills passed by Congress and signed by the president .
However , spending had already increased by $ 937 billion from the time President Trump was sworn in until the lockdown .
Federal spending is unlikely to be reduced no matter who wins the presidential election .
Former Vice President Joe Biden has proposed increasing spending on everything from Obamacare to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yet some progressives are attacking Biden for being to “ stingy ” in his spending proposals .
Even more distressing is how few progressives are critical of Biden ’ s support for increasing the military budget .
With some notable exceptions , such as his infrastructure plan , President Trump is not proposing any massive new spending programs .
However , he Is not promising to stop increasing , much less cut , federal spending .
Most Republicans have abandoned their Obama-era opposition to deficit spending to support President Trump ’ s spending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republicans oppose deficit spending under a Democrat president but decide that “ deficits don ’ t matter ” when a Republican is sitting in the Oval Office .
If Biden wins in November , Republicans will likely once again discover that deficits do matter , especially if Democrats also gain control of the Senate .
Government spending forcibly takes resources from the private sector , where they are used to produce goods and services desired by consumers , and puts them in the hands of politicians and bureaucrats .
This distorts the market @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s standard of living .
This , combined with pressure to monetize the federal debt , causes the Federal Reserve to pump money into the economy leading to a boom-bust business cycle .
Unless Congress begins reducing spending , the coming economic crisis will be even worse .
The logical place to start cutting spending is ending all unnecessary overseas commitments , corporate welfare , and shuttling down all unconstitutional federal agencies — starting with the Department of Education .
The savings from these cuts can be used to start paying down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the current system while we transition away from the welfare state .
Private charities , including ones run by religious organizations , are better than government bureaucracies at providing effective and compassionate aid to those in need .
Most politicians will not vote to curtail the welfare-warfare state unless their constituents demand it .
The people will not demand an end to big government as long as so many believe that the government has a moral responsibility to , and is capable of , providing them with economic and personal security .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting people to reject the entitlement mentality and embrace the philosophy of liberty and personal responsibility .
This will enable us to build a movement capable of convincing politicians to stop voting for more spending and debt and instead vote to respect the Constitutional limitations on government in all areas .
Dr. Ron Paul is an American physician , author , and former politician who served as the U.S. Representative for Texas 's 14th congressional district , which includes Galveston , from 1997 to 2013 as well as the 22nd congressional district for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when he lost reelection in 1978 , and for 3 later terms , from 1979 to 1985 .
On three occasions , he sought the presidency of the United States : as the Libertarian Party candidate in 1988 and as a candidate in the Republican primaries in 2008 and 2012 .
Paul is best known for his libertarian views and is a critic of American foreign , domestic , and monetary policies , including the military–industrial complex , the War on Drugs , and the Federal Reserve .
Paul has been married to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ five children , 18 grandchildren and 4 great grandchildren .
Ron Paul produces a weekly column known as Ron Paul 's Texas Straight Talk and is the author of several books

According to the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) latest “Update on the Budget Outlook,” this year’s $3.3 trillion federal deficit is not just three times larger than last year: it is the largest federal deficit in history. The CBO update also predicts that the federal debt will equal 104 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) next year and will reach 108 percent of GDP by 2030.
The CBO update also shows that the Social Security, Medicare, and highway trust funds will all be bankrupt by 2031. This will put pressure on Congress to bail out the trust funds thus further increasing the debt.
This year’s spike in federal spending was caused by the multi-trillion dollar coronavirus relief/economic stimulus bills passed by Congress and signed by the president. However, spending had already increased by $937 billion from the time President Trump was sworn in until the lockdown.
Federal spending is unlikely to be reduced no matter who wins the presidential election. Former Vice President Joe Biden has proposed increasing spending on everything from Obamacare to militarism to “green” cronyism. Yet some progressives are attacking Biden for being to “stingy” in his spending proposals. Even more distressing is how few progressives are critical of Biden’s support for increasing the military budget.
With some notable exceptions, such as his infrastructure plan, President Trump is not proposing any massive new spending programs. However, he Is not promising to stop increasing, much less cut, federal spending.
Most Republicans have abandoned their Obama-era opposition to deficit spending to support President Trump’s spending increases. This repeats a pattern where Republicans oppose deficit spending under a Democrat president but decide that “deficits don’t matter” when a Republican is sitting in the Oval Office. If Biden wins in November, Republicans will likely once again discover that deficits do matter, especially if Democrats also gain control of the Senate.
Government spending forcibly takes resources from the private sector, where they are used to produce goods and services desired by consumers, and puts them in the hands of politicians and bureaucrats. This distorts the market, reducing efficiency and lowering the people’s standard of living. This, combined with pressure to monetize the federal debt, causes the Federal Reserve to pump money into the economy leading to a boom-bust business cycle.
Unless Congress begins reducing spending, the coming economic crisis will be even worse. The logical place to start cutting spending is ending all unnecessary overseas commitments, corporate welfare, and shuttling down all unconstitutional federal agencies — starting with the Department of Education.
The savings from these cuts can be used to start paying down debt and providing for those truly dependent on the current system while we transition away from the welfare state. Private charities, including ones run by religious organizations, are better than government bureaucracies at providing effective and compassionate aid to those in need.
Most politicians will not vote to curtail the welfare-warfare state unless their constituents demand it. The people will not demand an end to big government as long as so many believe that the government has a moral responsibility to, and is capable of, providing them with economic and personal security.
Therefore, our priority must be on getting people to reject the entitlement mentality and embrace the philosophy of liberty and personal responsibility. This will enable us to build a movement capable of convincing politicians to stop voting for more spending and debt and instead vote to respect the Constitutional limitations on government in all areas.
Article posted with permission from Ron Paul


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-14--Lawmakers Demand Federal Investigation Into Netflix Film ‘Cuties’ For Child Pornography

“ Cuties ” is the left introducing child porn into the mainstream – mainstreaming pedophilia .
And former president Obama , his wife , Michelle , former UN Ambassador Susan Rice ( who sits on the Netflix board ) have signed multi-year deals .
The Obamas stated their intent was not to create a platform for liberal viewpoints or to counter conservative outlets like Fox News , but “ to cultivate and curate the talented , inspiring , creative voices who are able to promote greater empathy and understanding between peoples , and help them share their stories with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ members of Congress are demanding the DOJ investigate Netflix for distributing child porn via the new Netflix film , “ Cuties , ” which many people believe sexualizes young girls and encourages pedophilia .
The French film “ Cuties ” is about Amy , an 11-year-old Parisian , who struggles to balance the strict rules of her Senegalese Muslim family and the hyper sexualization of young girls on social media .
Amy and her friends are part of a dance troupe that dresses in revealing outfits while performing suggestive choreography .
In a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Republican Sen. Ted Cruz urged the Department of Justice to investigate whether the film violates child pornography laws .
“ I urge the Department of Justice to investigate the production and distribution of this film to determine whether Netflix , its executives , or the individuals involved in the filming and production of ‘ Cuties ’ violated any federal laws against the production and distribution of child pornography , ” Cruz wrote , joining a growing group of Washington lawmakers calling for a Department of Justice investigation of Netflix over airing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tom Cotton wrote on Twitter , “ Like any parent , I find  @ netflix decision to peddle child pornography disgusting .
And it ’ s criminal .
 @ TheJusticeDept should take swift action.
” Indiana Republican Rep. Jim Banks has also called for the DOJ to bring child porn charges against Netflix .
“ As a father of young daughters , I find it sickening .
Not only is this movie fodder for pedophiles , it encourages very young girls to defy their parents ’ wishes and share pornographic images @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told the Daily Caller .
.
‘ The lessons taught in this film are not ones I want my daughters learning.
” Banks added that the DOJ should be “ readying charges against Netflix for distribution of child pornography.
” Hawaii Democrat Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard also accused Netflix of being complicit in pedophilia and child trafficking .
The initial outrage over the new film was ignited after Netflix released a promotional poster for the film in mid-August which depicted the four main character young actresses in suggestive poses and exposed midriffs .
Netflix @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , calling it “ inappropriate , ” but did not stop the film from being released on their platform this week .
Since its release , a growing campaign to “ cancel Netflix ” has ensued .
For the past several days on Twitter , “ # CancelNetflix ” has been a top trending topic .
In addition to the trend , a series of petitions , signed by hundreds of thousands , have encouraged many to cancel their Netflix subscriptions .
Since its release , a growing campaign to “ cancel Netflix @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several days on Twitter , “ # CancelNetflix ” has been a top trending topic .
In addition to the trend , a series of petitions , signed by hundreds of thousands , have encouraged many to cancel their Netflix subscriptions .
“ Cancel Netflix ” trends are not new .
In 2018 Netflix confirmed that it had signed a multiyear deal with Barack and Michelle Obama , , inciting outrage from conservatives .
Earlier this year , people threatened to cancel Netflix over “ 365 Days , ” a movie that petitioners @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This time , however , Netflix may be feeling a more impactful financial blow than ever before .
Ryan Fournier who campaigns for younger Trump voters wrote on Twitter that it is “ good ” Netflix has lost over $ 9 billion in stock market value since the # CancelNetflix hashtag began .
The 35-year old French-Senegalese director of “ Cuties , ” Maimouna Doucouré , has defended her movie as a commentary on the dangers of society sexualizing its youth .
Many in the corporate media have jumped to defend the film @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leftists in Hollywood , like actress Tessa Thompson , who called the film “ beautiful.
” Critics of the film have fired back , saying that the disturbing and graphic imagery defeats the purpose of exposing the oversexualization of children in our culture .
Lila Rose , a pro-life advocate and campaigner for children ’ s rights , explained that , “ You don ’ t fight child exploitation by exploiting children.
” Filmmaker Sonia Poulton sounded off on Twitter saying , “ If you call ‘ Cuties ’ art or a ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a child abuser .
We have no time for niceties while children are being sexualized for mass entertainment .
# CancelNetflix ”

“Cuties” is the left introducing child porn into the mainstream – mainstreaming pedophilia. And former president Obama, his wife, Michelle, former UN Ambassador Susan Rice (who sits on the Netflix board) have signed multi-year deals.
The Obamas stated their intent was not to create a platform for liberal viewpoints or to counter conservative outlets like Fox News, but “to cultivate and curate the talented, inspiring, creative voices who are able to promote greater empathy and understanding between peoples, and help them share their stories with the entire world.”
Child porn.
Norming child porn. It's what the left does – introduces the most disgusting, unacceptable ideas into the mainstream, then turns on anyone who finds them disgusting and unacceptable. It's how the country has been brought to the brink. https://t.co/9e4v7bxY7B — Geller Report (@PamelaGeller) September 13, 2020
.@Netflix should explain to the public why it is distributing a film, “Cuties,” that appears to sexually exploit children and endanger child welfare pic.twitter.com/OZH4HCLy0Y — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) September 11, 2020
Lawmakers Demand Federal Investigation Into Netflix Film ‘Cuties’ For Child Pornography
By Evita Duffy, The Federalist, September 12, 2020:
Both Democrat and Republican members of Congress are demanding the DOJ investigate Netflix for distributing child porn via the new Netflix film, “Cuties,” which many people believe sexualizes young girls and encourages pedophilia.
The French film “Cuties” is about Amy, an 11-year-old Parisian, who struggles to balance the strict rules of her Senegalese Muslim family and the hyper sexualization of young girls on social media. Amy and her friends are part of a dance troupe that dresses in revealing outfits while performing suggestive choreography.
In a letter Friday to Attorney General Bill Barr, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz urged the Department of Justice to investigate whether the film violates child pornography laws.
“I urge the Department of Justice to investigate the production and distribution of this film to determine whether Netflix, its executives, or the individuals involved in the filming and production of ‘Cuties’ violated any federal laws against the production and distribution of child pornography,” Cruz wrote, joining a growing group of Washington lawmakers calling for a Department of Justice investigation of Netflix over airing the new film “Cuties.”
Republican Sen. Tom Cotton wrote on Twitter, “Like any parent, I find @netflix decision to peddle child pornography disgusting. And it’s criminal. @TheJusticeDept should take swift action.”
Like any parent, I find @netflix decision to peddle child pornography disgusting. And it’s criminal. @TheJusticeDept should take swift action. https://t.co/ReEVk7F8t9 — Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) September 12, 2020
Indiana Republican Rep. Jim Banks has also called for the DOJ to bring child porn charges against Netflix.
As a father of three young daughters, I find “Cuties” sickening. Glad to join @SenTomCotton in calling on the DOJ to bring charges against Netflix for distribution of child pornography. https://t.co/xmHO3b1yLN — Jim Banks (@RepJimBanks) September 11, 2020
“As a father of young daughters, I find it sickening. Not only is this movie fodder for pedophiles, it encourages very young girls to defy their parents’ wishes and share pornographic images of themselves with strangers,” Banks told the Daily Caller. . ‘The lessons taught in this film are not ones I want my daughters learning.”
Banks added that the DOJ should be “readying charges against Netflix for distribution of child pornography.”
Hawaii Democrat Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard also accused Netflix of being complicit in pedophilia and child trafficking.
.@netflix child porn "Cuties" will certainly whet the appetite of pedophiles & help fuel the child sex trafficking trade. 1 in 4 victims of trafficking are children. It happened to my friend's 13 year old daughter. Netflix, you are now complicit. #CancelNetflix pic.twitter.com/GI8KFH7LFq — Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) September 12, 2020
The initial outrage over the new film was ignited after Netflix released a promotional poster for the film in mid-August which depicted the four main character young actresses in suggestive poses and exposed midriffs. Netflix apologized for the film’s artwork, calling it “inappropriate,” but did not stop the film from being released on their platform this week.
Since its release, a growing campaign to “cancel Netflix” has ensued. For the past several days on Twitter, “#CancelNetflix” has been a top trending topic. In addition to the trend, a series of petitions, signed by hundreds of thousands, have encouraged many to cancel their Netflix subscriptions.
Since its release, a growing campaign to “cancel Netflix” has ensued. For the past several days on Twitter, “#CancelNetflix” has been a top trending topic. In addition to the trend, a series of petitions, signed by hundreds of thousands, have encouraged many to cancel their Netflix subscriptions.
“Cancel Netflix” trends are not new. In 2018 Netflix confirmed that it had signed a multiyear deal with Barack and Michelle Obama, , inciting outrage from conservatives. Earlier this year, people threatened to cancel Netflix over “365 Days,” a movie that petitioners argued glorified sexual violence against women. This time, however, Netflix may be feeling a more impactful financial blow than ever before.
Ryan Fournier who campaigns for younger Trump voters wrote on Twitter that it is “good” Netflix has lost over $9 billion in stock market value since the #CancelNetflix hashtag began.
Netflix has lost over $9 billion in market value since the #CancelNetflix hashtag went viral. Good. Any network that promotes pedophelia should fall. — Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) September 12, 2020
The 35-year old French-Senegalese director of “Cuties,” Maimouna Doucouré, has defended her movie as a commentary on the dangers of society sexualizing its youth. Many in the corporate media have jumped to defend the film, in addition to a number of leftists in Hollywood, like actress Tessa Thompson, who called the film “beautiful.”
Disappointed to see how it was positioned in terms of marketing. I understand the response of everybody. But it doesn’t speak to the film I saw. https://t.co/L6kmAcJFU1 — Tessa Thompson (@TessaThompson_x) August 20, 2020
Critics of the film have fired back, saying that the disturbing and graphic imagery defeats the purpose of exposing the oversexualization of children in our culture.
Lila Rose, a pro-life advocate and campaigner for children’s rights, explained that, “You don’t fight child exploitation by exploiting children.”
You don’t fight child exploitation by exploiting children. You don’t stop child pornography by creating, selling and distributing child pornography.#CancelNetflix — Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) September 11, 2020
Filmmaker Sonia Poulton sounded off on Twitter saying, “If you call ‘Cuties’ art or a ‘social statement’. I call you a child abuser. We have no time for niceties while children are being sexualized for mass entertainment. #CancelNetflix”
If you call ‘Cuties’ art or a ‘social statement’. I call you a child abuser. We have no time for niceties while children are being sexualised for mass entertainment. #CancelNetflix — Sonia Poulton (@SoniaPoulton) September 10, 2020
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-15--Why a COVID-19 Vaccine Likely Won’t Happen Anytime Soon

Leave it to me to go against the grain again , but I have to call it like I see it , just as I have said for months that Hillary Clinton would never run for President again , despite nearly everyone declaring “ she ’ s running !
” So once again , I ’ m going to call this like I see it , and perhaps I will be proven wrong in my theory , but knowing how these people run their strategies , what I foresee is their long game of not producing a vaccine so as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Let me explain… While everyone is focused on the potential outcomes of a vaccine , they are missing the alternative flipside to this drama series .
The name of the game is control through fear .
Through governors and mayors , they have been controlling the economy , people ’ s civil rights , and placing mandates and restrictions on everything they can conjure up , from wearing masks to closing businesses and schools , social distancing rules , not allowing church service , and on and on it goes .
Not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and allow everyone ’ s pretty faces to shine again , they would be handing over a perceived win to President Trump as the savior of this “ virus.
” It would put a hard stop to restrictions and relinquish their power over everyone .
“ But , they want to track us through chips , depopulate us , and make trillions on these vaccines !
” Sure , the chip option is always on the table , as they ’ ve been working on variations of such devices for quite some time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a chip may be on the syringe itself , not inside the syringe .
Not that we would take their word for anything , but let ’ s contemplate the obvious .
Millions of people get the flu shot every year .
Who ’ s to say they are not already chipped , or perhaps they ’ re not – but that option has long been there .
The same goes for the depopulation theory .
We are of far more value alive and sick , than dead .
The pharmaceutical and health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sick people .
Now , what about trillions they could make on a global COVID-19 vaccine ?
Why would you do that and blow your load in a single vaccine that may or may not be required each year thereafter , when you can milk taxpayer dollars for years to come ?
Of course , there is the theory that they will make the vaccine mandatory in every state and not allow people to go to work or buy groceries unless they can show proof of the vaccine .
All signs point to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ across the globe as a whole .
And that may be their end game for the long haul , unless they are thrown completely off course .
What would happen if therapeutics beat them to the punch ?
Or , if a vaccine can ’ t be approved for production ?
Or , what if enough evidence came to light of the actual death rate , that shuts this entire COVID vaccine agenda down ?
All are plausible at this point .
Let ’ s take the HIV/AIDS slush fund for an example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all its worth .
In 1984 , when they terrorized the nation with high intensity fear mongering , much like they are doing with COVID , they claimed they would have a vaccine produced within two years , then it was ten , then over 20 countries were running over 30 vaccine trials , and by 2015 Bill Gates declared “ An HIV vaccine is coming !
( by 2030 ) .
” On and on it went , as billions of taxpayer dollars were shelled out and 36 years later , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A vaccine simply can not be produced for some alleged viruses and diseases because of reasons we won ’ t get into in this article .
Sure , there are also suppressed cures for some diseases , and I believe some of those may come to light over the next few years .
The longer they string it out , the more funds go in , allowing them to circulate those funds among one another , much how they have managed Bill Gates ’ Global Fund for two decades .
And let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ allow people to drop their masks , how will the rioters continue their agenda to terrorize , destroy , and keep people in a state of fear ?
That 14-day quarantine has evolved into 6 months .
Who saw that coming ?
I sure did .
Their goal is the long game because they know Trump is going to win the election by a landslide .
If they give him a vaccine , produced in record time , they just handed him another win , despite the fact that most would argue a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dangerous without long term clinical trials .
So why is Trump playing along ?
Does he want a vaccine ?
Going back to my report from April , ‘ Investigations & The Battle for A Vaccine : Where is This Headed ?
’ I stated this same theory back then , but with much less to go on .
I showed a timeline of critical events , actions , and words that had been carried out by the Trump administration versus Bill Gates ’ “ team , ” and indicated that vaccines feel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Trump pulled out of the WHO , refuses to be a part of the vaccine COVAX team , pulled funds from NIH and announced an investigation into it , stated that the $ 6 billion a year to PEPFAR needed to be looked into and reallocated , and that they would be doing some research “ on important people who take a lot of credit for what they do.
” Trump is fully aware of all individuals involved in running what he knows to be – slush funds .
In addition to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LOT , he has repeatedly fought for hydroxychloroquine , which has more recently been pushed in an even brighter spotlight , and I covered this in my report ‘ COVID-19 : The Coverup , The Cure , and Key Evidence.
’ In fact , on August 18th , Senators Ted Cruz , Mike Lee , and Ron Johnson submitted a letter to the FDA demanding information regarding their actions on the use of hydroxychloroquine .
So why does Trump consistently tout that a vaccine is coming soon and that we may see it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while the CDC puts out a statement to all governors to prepare by November 1st for a COVID vaccine , just in case it ’ s ready by then – two days before the election .
We are in a battle against a global enemy that runs so deep and operates on pushing fear and propaganda – you have to play the game if you are in it to win it .
This is an election year , the most important election in the history of America , and people are already in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the enemy ’ s tactics .
They are organized , diligent , and have many low-hanging players involved across the globe , willing to alter numbers , test results , and death rates in order to keep this fear alive .
If Trump were to say that he has no interest in a vaccine , though he has stated he prefers therapeutics several times , it would be game over .
Does that make him a liar ?
Is it being done with good intention to help the people ?
Do you want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
That ’ s for you to decide .
What ’ s it going to look like after he wins the election ?
If big pharma , Bill Gates , and Dr. Anthony Fauci have already stated numerous times that they don ’ t think they will have a vaccine until 2021 , and their intention is to drag this out much longer , create another COVID-19 wave in winter , and milk it for every restriction they can impose on people , when will it end ?
I suspect we are going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rectified statistics emerging over the next couple of months .
We have already seen the CDC come out and state , “ For 6 % of the deaths , COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned .
For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average , there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.
” The 2.6 comorbidities consist of heart disease , influenza , cardiac arrest , and other life-threatening illnesses , with over 40 % of the deaths resulting from nursing homes .
There have also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive numbers , which skews data , and others who were getting false/positive tests .
Even the New York Times published an article titled ‘ Your Coronavirus Test is Positive .
Maybe it Shouldn ’ t Be , ” stating that “ Up to 90 % of people testing positive carried barely any virus ” and suggesting that too many people are unnecessarily isolating .
On August 26th , the Justice Department put out an immediate release “ requesting data from Governors of states that issued COVID-19 orders that may have resulted in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” which include New York , New Jersey , Pennsylvania , and Michigan .
The “ data will help inform whether the Department of Justice will initiate investigations under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act ( CRIPA ) .
” When you take all of this into consideration , after having studied President Trump and the enemies ’ actions , strategies , and patterns , I can only conclude that information will come to light shortly after the elections .
I do not believe we will have a COVID-19 vaccine in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposing the exaggerations of this virus and the fact that the economy did not need to be shut down , and therapeutics will be made more readily available for those who may need them .
I do believe that big pharma and its entourage will continue to push for a vaccine , siphoning as much funding as possible , while corrupt governors and mayors forge ahead with ongoing restrictions .
For some , the prospect of ongoing restrictions is far worse than a vaccine emerging with potential mandates .
Though these restrictions are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do feel that as new information surfaces , there will be a concerted effort by the people , attorneys , and the Trump administration to apply pressure to states that are overstepping their authority and ultimately destroying people ’ s livelihood .
To date , I believe that not enough people have stepped up against this tyranny and are following along for fear of confrontation .
After six months of this , I had hoped to see more action , but think we are right on the cusp of that tide turning .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s rallies ?
I see the most enthusiastic group of patriots ever to have walked the earth .
I see a man who has the support of millions .
I also see a man who knows that masks and social distancing are not necessary .
What does this tell you ?
Follow his actions and read between the lines when he speaks .
We are at war .
That said , at no point should anyone be sitting back without taking action .
People need to be vocal , stand up for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and unnecessary mandates , demand that schools open , fight to get on school boards , pay close attention to legislation in your area and fight against it , and most importantly – vote on every single local and state level election that takes place , in addition to the presidency .
It is our responsibility to make the changes we want to see , to fight against tyranny , and to create a better “ here and now ” as well as a better future .
We are our own saviors .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , originally published at CoreysDigs.com

Leave it to me to go against the grain again, but I have to call it like I see it, just as I have said for months that Hillary Clinton would never run for President again, despite nearly everyone declaring “she’s running!” So once again, I’m going to call this like I see it, and perhaps I will be proven wrong in my theory, but knowing how these people run their strategies, what I foresee is their long game of not producing a vaccine so as to maintain power over people through fear. Let me explain…
While everyone is focused on the potential outcomes of a vaccine, they are missing the alternative flipside to this drama series. The name of the game is control through fear. Through governors and mayors, they have been controlling the economy, people’s civil rights, and placing mandates and restrictions on everything they can conjure up, from wearing masks to closing businesses and schools, social distancing rules, not allowing church service, and on and on it goes. Not only would a vaccine remove those abilities and allow everyone’s pretty faces to shine again, they would be handing over a perceived win to President Trump as the savior of this “virus.” It would put a hard stop to restrictions and relinquish their power over everyone.
“But, they want to track us through chips, depopulate us, and make trillions on these vaccines!” Sure, the chip option is always on the table, as they’ve been working on variations of such devices for quite some time. As it stands, they indicate a chip may be on the syringe itself, not inside the syringe. Not that we would take their word for anything, but let’s contemplate the obvious. Millions of people get the flu shot every year. Who’s to say they are not already chipped, or perhaps they’re not – but that option has long been there. The same goes for the depopulation theory. We are of far more value alive and sick, than dead. The pharmaceutical and health industry make billions upon billions off of sick people. Now, what about trillions they could make on a global COVID-19 vaccine? Why would you do that and blow your load in a single vaccine that may or may not be required each year thereafter, when you can milk taxpayer dollars for years to come?
Of course, there is the theory that they will make the vaccine mandatory in every state and not allow people to go to work or buy groceries unless they can show proof of the vaccine. All signs point to this when observing the tactics being used across the globe as a whole. And that may be their end game for the long haul, unless they are thrown completely off course. What would happen if therapeutics beat them to the punch? Or, if a vaccine can’t be approved for production? Or, what if enough evidence came to light of the actual death rate, that shuts this entire COVID vaccine agenda down? All are plausible at this point.
Let’s take the HIV/AIDS slush fund for an example on how these groups milk it for all its worth. In 1984, when they terrorized the nation with high intensity fear mongering, much like they are doing with COVID, they claimed they would have a vaccine produced within two years, then it was ten, then over 20 countries were running over 30 vaccine trials, and by 2015 Bill Gates declared “An HIV vaccine is coming! (by 2030).” On and on it went, as billions of taxpayer dollars were shelled out and 36 years later, they still don’t have a vaccine. A vaccine simply cannot be produced for some alleged viruses and diseases because of reasons we won’t get into in this article. Sure, there are also suppressed cures for some diseases, and I believe some of those may come to light over the next few years.
The longer they string it out, the more funds go in, allowing them to circulate those funds among one another, much how they have managed Bill Gates’ Global Fund for two decades. And let’s face it, if they allow people to drop their masks, how will the rioters continue their agenda to terrorize, destroy, and keep people in a state of fear? That 14-day quarantine has evolved into 6 months. Who saw that coming? I sure did. Their goal is the long game because they know Trump is going to win the election by a landslide. If they give him a vaccine, produced in record time, they just handed him another win, despite the fact that most would argue a “record time” would be irresponsibly dangerous without long term clinical trials. So why is Trump playing along? Does he want a vaccine?
Going back to my report from April, ‘Investigations & The Battle for A Vaccine: Where is This Headed?’ I stated this same theory back then, but with much less to go on. I showed a timeline of critical events, actions, and words that had been carried out by the Trump administration versus Bill Gates’ “team,” and indicated that vaccines feel like a longshot for the US. President Trump pulled out of the WHO, refuses to be a part of the vaccine COVAX team, pulled funds from NIH and announced an investigation into it, stated that the $6 billion a year to PEPFAR needed to be looked into and reallocated, and that they would be doing some research “on important people who take a lot of credit for what they do.” Trump is fully aware of all individuals involved in running what he knows to be – slush funds. In addition to all of this, which is a LOT, he has repeatedly fought for hydroxychloroquine, which has more recently been pushed in an even brighter spotlight, and I covered this in my report ‘COVID-19: The Coverup, The Cure, and Key Evidence.’ In fact, on August 18th, Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Ron Johnson submitted a letter to the FDA demanding information regarding their actions on the use of hydroxychloroquine.
So why does Trump consistently tout that a vaccine is coming soon and that we may see it as early as October or December, while the CDC puts out a statement to all governors to prepare by November 1st for a COVID vaccine, just in case it’s ready by then – two days before the election. We are in a battle against a global enemy that runs so deep and operates on pushing fear and propaganda – you have to play the game if you are in it to win it. This is an election year, the most important election in the history of America, and people are already in an amped up state of fear by the enemy’s tactics. They are organized, diligent, and have many low-hanging players involved across the globe, willing to alter numbers, test results, and death rates in order to keep this fear alive. If Trump were to say that he has no interest in a vaccine, though he has stated he prefers therapeutics several times, it would be game over. Does that make him a liar? Is it being done with good intention to help the people? Do you want transparency over strategy, loss over win? That’s for you to decide.
What’s it going to look like after he wins the election? If big pharma, Bill Gates, and Dr. Anthony Fauci have already stated numerous times that they don’t think they will have a vaccine until 2021, and their intention is to drag this out much longer, create another COVID-19 wave in winter, and milk it for every restriction they can impose on people, when will it end?
I suspect we are going to see a lot more evidence and rectified statistics emerging over the next couple of months. We have already seen the CDC come out and state, “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.” The 2.6 comorbidities consist of heart disease, influenza, cardiac arrest, and other life-threatening illnesses, with over 40% of the deaths resulting from nursing homes. There have also been numerous reports on labs only reporting positive numbers, which skews data, and others who were getting false/positive tests. Even the New York Times published an article titled ‘Your Coronavirus Test is Positive. Maybe it Shouldn’t Be,” stating that “Up to 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus” and suggesting that too many people are unnecessarily isolating.
On August 26th, the Justice Department put out an immediate release “requesting data from Governors of states that issued COVID-19 orders that may have resulted in deaths of elderly nursing home residents,” which include New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. The “data will help inform whether the Department of Justice will initiate investigations under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA).”
When you take all of this into consideration, after having studied President Trump and the enemies’ actions, strategies, and patterns, I can only conclude that information will come to light shortly after the elections. I do not believe we will have a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S., more data will be revealed exposing the exaggerations of this virus and the fact that the economy did not need to be shut down, and therapeutics will be made more readily available for those who may need them. I do believe that big pharma and its entourage will continue to push for a vaccine, siphoning as much funding as possible, while corrupt governors and mayors forge ahead with ongoing restrictions. For some, the prospect of ongoing restrictions is far worse than a vaccine emerging with potential mandates. Though these restrictions are mandated on a state level, I do feel that as new information surfaces, there will be a concerted effort by the people, attorneys, and the Trump administration to apply pressure to states that are overstepping their authority and ultimately destroying people’s livelihood. To date, I believe that not enough people have stepped up against this tyranny and are following along for fear of confrontation. After six months of this, I had hoped to see more action, but think we are right on the cusp of that tide turning.
What do you see at Trump’s rallies? I see the most enthusiastic group of patriots ever to have walked the earth. I see a man who has the support of millions. I also see a man who knows that masks and social distancing are not necessary. What does this tell you? Follow his actions and read between the lines when he speaks. We are at war.
That said, at no point should anyone be sitting back without taking action. People need to be vocal, stand up for their rights, defy these monsters setting unrealistic and unnecessary mandates, demand that schools open, fight to get on school boards, pay close attention to legislation in your area and fight against it, and most importantly – vote on every single local and state level election that takes place, in addition to the presidency.
It is our responsibility to make the changes we want to see, to fight against tyranny, and to create a better “here and now” as well as a better future. We are our own saviors.
Article posted with permission from Corey Lynn, originally published at CoreysDigs.com


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-17--The Government Has Released Their Initial Plans To Force A Vaccine On Everyone

Earlier today , the Trump administration released its plans to vaccine everyone in a short time .
Three potential vaccines are currently in Stage 3 trials in the United States and could be ready in weeks , President Donald Trump said Tuesday .
Time is running out .
And Trump has the military lined up and ready to distribute this vaccine to the public , whether you want it or not .
The plan is to distribute the vaccine first to health care and other vital workers , as well as those most vulnerable ( likely the older populations ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be made available to all Americans who want it .
If you decide you don ’ t want it , don ’ t worry , the military will help convince you .
The Department of Defense and federal health agencies have outlined plans for a coronavirus vaccine , which includes having them available for free for all Americans .
We have warned that the DoD is about to become the enemy of the public .
Instead of committing terrorism abroad , they will be going that here .
Prepare yourself .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mass Distribute The COVID Vaccine This toxic concoction will also be “ free.
” The government says they will foot the bill ( borrow money from the Federal Reserve ) to get everyone vaccinated , according to the Watauga Democrat .
“ Preparing for the implementation of the safe and efficacious COVID-19 vaccine programs is a critical next step in the efforts to protect Americans and reduce the impact of COVID-19 and restore our normal way of life , ” Centers for Disease Control and Director Dr. Robert Redfield said Wednesday , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the form of a report to Congress and a “ playbook ” for states and local governments , according to the Associated Press and Fox News .
The agencies are looking at January for a potential beginning of a vaccination campaign , although it remains possible that this could come later this year .
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ’ s playbook , the vaccination campaign will be “ much larger in scope and complexity than seasonal influenza or other previous outbreak-related vaccination responses.
” President Trump said in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tuesday that a vaccine could be approved “ in a matter of weeks.
” Time is almost up .
Once this vaccine gets into your bloodstream , you can not take it back out .
This one is different from every other vaccine made , and it ’ s going to be necessary if you want to get groceries or leave your house .
Mandatory or not , they will do what they can to convince you to take this vaccine .

Earlier today, the Trump administration released its plans to vaccine everyone in a short time. Three potential vaccines are currently in Stage 3 trials in the United States and could be ready in weeks, President Donald Trump said Tuesday.
Time is running out. And Trump has the military lined up and ready to distribute this vaccine to the public, whether you want it or not. The plan is to distribute the vaccine first to health care and other vital workers, as well as those most vulnerable (likely the older populations). After production ramps up, it will be made available to all Americans who want it. If you decide you don’t want it, don’t worry, the military will help convince you.
The Department of Defense and federal health agencies have outlined plans for a coronavirus vaccine, which includes having them available for free for all Americans. We have warned that the DoD is about to become the enemy of the public. Instead of committing terrorism abroad, they will be going that here. Prepare yourself.
The Pentagon & CDC Will Join Together To Mass Distribute The COVID Vaccine
This toxic concoction will also be “free.” The government says they will foot the bill (borrow money from the Federal Reserve) to get everyone vaccinated, according to the Watauga Democrat.
“Preparing for the implementation of the safe and efficacious COVID-19 vaccine programs is a critical next step in the efforts to protect Americans and reduce the impact of COVID-19 and restore our normal way of life,” Centers for Disease Control and Director Dr. Robert Redfield said Wednesday, according to CNN.
The plans came in the form of a report to Congress and a “playbook” for states and local governments, according to the Associated Press and Fox News. The agencies are looking at January for a potential beginning of a vaccination campaign, although it remains possible that this could come later this year.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s playbook, the vaccination campaign will be “much larger in scope and complexity than seasonal influenza or other previous outbreak-related vaccination responses.”
President Trump said in a “Fox & Friends” interview Tuesday that a vaccine could be approved “in a matter of weeks.”
Time is almost up. Once this vaccine gets into your bloodstream, you cannot take it back out. This one is different from every other vaccine made, and it’s going to be necessary if you want to get groceries or leave your house. Mandatory or not, they will do what they can to convince you to take this vaccine.
Stay alert and be prepared.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-17--They Are Still Lying About COVID-19 Numbers

The powers-that-shouldn ’ t -be are still lying about the COVID-19 numbers six months after the initial fear-mongering began .
Now there are reports that Nashville “ officials ” concealed the low infection rates coming out of bars and restaurants .
The panic and fear have subsided a lot , yet we are still told to mask up to prevent the spread of a virus that isn ’ t deadly at all .
Even with all the information and continual reports that the ruling class lied repeatedly , people are still not getting it .
It ’ s way past @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Now , new reports show that leaked emails between the senior adviser to Nashville ’ s Mayor and a health department official reveal a disturbing effort to conceal extremely low coronavirus cases emanating from bars and restaurants , while the lion ’ s share of infections occurred in nursing homes and construction workers , according to WZTV Nashville .
So why were bars and restaurants shut down ?
It ’ s a culling of the middle class .
But we already know this .
On June 30th , contact tracing was giving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Construction and nursing homes causing problems more than a thousand cases traced to each category , but bars and restaurants reported just 22 cases .
Leslie Waller from the health department asks “ This isn ’ t going to be publicly released , right ?
Just info for Mayor ’ s Office ?
” Four weeks later , Tennessean reporter Nate Rau asked the health department : “ the figure you gave of “ more than 80 ” does lead to a natural question : If there have been over 20,000 positive cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or so are traced to restaurants and bars , doesn ’ t that mean restaurants and bars aren ’ t a very big problem ?
” To which health department official Brian Todd scrambled for an answer – asking five health department officials : “ Please advise how you respond .
BT.
” The response – from an official whose name was omitted from the leaked email : “ My two cents .
We have certainly refused to give counts per bar because those numbers are low per site , ” adding “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and then a response to the over 80 could be “ because that number is increasing all the time and we don ’ t want to say a specific number.
” ” –ZeroHedge According to a metro staff attorney , who was asked by city councilmember Steve Glover to verify the authenticity of the emails , “ I was able to get verification from the Mayor ’ s Office and the Department of Health that these emails are real.
” Glover told WZTV : “ They are fabricating information .
They ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It ’ s gone I don ’ t trust a thing they say going forward …nothing.
” Glover says he has been contacted by an endless stream of downtown bartenders , waitresses , and restaurant owners .
Why would they not release these numbers ?
“ We raised taxes 34 percent and put hundreds literally thousands of people out of work that are now worried about losing their homes their apartments etcetera and we did it on bogus data .
That should be illegal !
” he says .
Again , we weren @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s office this wasn ’ t true .
We were told to file a freedom of information act request .
–WZTV This entire debacle was a sam from beginning to now .
The problem is when people figure out this was a scam to bring in the New World Order , those who seek power over people will likely pull another stunt .
Keep your eyes open .
It ’ s hard to say for sure , but this doesn ’ t feel “ over ” yet .

The powers-that-shouldn’t -be are still lying about the COVID-19 numbers six months after the initial fear-mongering began. Now there are reports that Nashville “officials” concealed the low infection rates coming out of bars and restaurants.
The panic and fear have subsided a lot, yet we are still told to mask up to prevent the spread of a virus that isn’t deadly at all. Even with all the information and continual reports that the ruling class lied repeatedly, people are still not getting it. It’s way past time to wake up to this hoax.
CDC & Fauci CONFIRM: COVID-19 Scamdemic Was A HOAX!
Now, new reports show that leaked emails between the senior adviser to Nashville’s Mayor and a health department official reveal a disturbing effort to conceal extremely low coronavirus cases emanating from bars and restaurants, while the lion’s share of infections occurred in nursing homes and construction workers, according to WZTV Nashville. So why were bars and restaurants shut down? It’s a culling of the middle class. But we already know this.
On June 30th, contact tracing was giving a small view of coronavirus clusters. Construction and nursing homes causing problems more than a thousand cases traced to each category, but bars and restaurants reported just 22 cases. Leslie Waller from the health department asks “This isn’t going to be publicly released, right? Just info for Mayor’s Office?” “Correct, not for public consumption.” Writes senior advisor Benjamin Eagles. –WZTV
Four weeks later, Tennessean reporter Nate Rau asked the health department: “the figure you gave of “more than 80” does lead to a natural question: If there have been over 20,000 positive cases of COVID-19 in Davidson and only 80 or so are traced to restaurants and bars, doesn’t that mean restaurants and bars aren’t a very big problem?”
To which health department official Brian Todd scrambled for an answer – asking five health department officials: “Please advise how you respond. BT.” The response – from an official whose name was omitted from the leaked email: “My two cents. We have certainly refused to give counts per bar because those numbers are low per site,” adding “We could still release the total though, and then a response to the over 80 could be “because that number is increasing all the time and we don’t want to say a specific number.”” –ZeroHedge
According to a metro staff attorney, who was asked by city councilmember Steve Glover to verify the authenticity of the emails, “I was able to get verification from the Mayor’s Office and the Department of Health that these emails are real.” Glover told WZTV: “They are fabricating information. They’ve blown there entire credibility Dennis. It’s gone I don’t trust a thing they say going forward …nothing.”
Glover says he has been contacted by an endless stream of downtown bartenders, waitresses, and restaurant owners. Why would they not release these numbers? “We raised taxes 34 percent and put hundreds literally thousands of people out of work that are now worried about losing their homes their apartments etcetera and we did it on bogus data. That should be illegal!” he says. Again, we weren’t told by the mayor’s office this wasn’t true. We were told to file a freedom of information act request. –WZTV
This entire debacle was a sam from beginning to now. The problem is when people figure out this was a scam to bring in the New World Order, those who seek power over people will likely pull another stunt. Keep your eyes open. It’s hard to say for sure, but this doesn’t feel “over” yet.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-17--If Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah Did The Things Trump Is Doing, Trump Supporters Would…

If Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah Did The Things Trump Is Doing , Trump Supporters Would… Sons of Liberty radio @ @ @ @ @ Brown discuss how some Trump supporters let President Trump get away with things they would @ @ @ @ @ Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah get away with , or they seek to justify them @ @ @ @ @ stubborn things , and the standard is still the Bible… and in our form of @ @ @ @ @ A few articles mentioned in this episode .
Partner with us as a Son or @ @ @ @ @ : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , @ @ @ @ @ Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband @ @ @ @ @ than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of @ @ @ @ @ lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina @ @ @ @ @ Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

If Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah Did The Things Trump Is Doing, Trump Supporters Would…
Sons of Liberty radio hosts Bradlee Dean and Tim Brown discuss how some Trump supporters let President Trump get away with things they would have never let the usurper Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah get away with, or they seek to justify them. However, facts are stubborn things, and the standard is still the Bible… and in our form of government, the Constitution.
A few articles mentioned in this episode.
https://www.trumpgolfcount.com/
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/did-you-see-what-the-californian-government-lists-of-requirements-were-for-them-to-have-church-here-is-the-list/
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-17--LIVE:  Michigan Second Amendment March (Video)

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to his `` more @ @ @ @ @ , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian @ @ @ @ @ He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim @ @ @ @ @ him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com . He is husband to his "more precious than rubies" wife, father of 10 "mighty arrows", jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. . Follow Tim on Twitter . Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-17--Human Rights Group Blocked From Monitoring Julian Assange Trial – What Are They Hiding?

The media has largely been silent over Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange following his arrest .
They dragged his name through the mud , said he should have a bullet put in his head and attacked him relentlessly… and so did politicians .
Now , it appears that during his trial , human rights groups are being blocked from monitoring what is going on .
Why is that and what is being hidden from the public ?
Alan Macleod has the story from MintPress News .
The high profile extradition hearing of publisher and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange continued in Central @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without oversight from international human rights groups .
Julia Hall , an expert on criminal justice and human rights for Amnesty International , revealed that her organization was again denied entry to the court today , despite their repeated requests to be recognized as fair trial monitors .
Fair trial monitors are a critical component to upholding transparency and regulation in courtrooms across the world , reminding authorities that independent witnesses are scrutinizing them .
Hall noted that Amnesty monitors have been recognized as international fair trial monitors for cases in many repressive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and even oversaw cases at Guantanamo Bay .
“ It is a disgrace that the UK has failed to recognize that international fair trial monitors should be officially recognized and permitted access to the Assange hearings .
Open justice is not served by this failure , it is profoundly undermined , ” she wrote .
Amnesty International ’ s Europe Director , Nils Muižnieks , described the hearing as a “ full-scale assault on the right to freedom of expression , ” noting that if he were prosecuted , it would have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leading publishers and journalists to self-censor in fear of retaliation.
” Hall added that it was not only Assange who was on trial but the fundamental tenets of media freedom .
Amnesty also warned that an international smear campaign against him had threatened his right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty .
Britain would also be breaking its obligation to international human rights law by transferring the Australian to a known human rights abusing nation , according to the organization .
Assange is charged with violating the US Espionage Act and 17 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If extradited from the United Kingdom , he faces up to 175 years in a supermax prison in Florence , Colorado , described as the only “ black site ” on U.S. soil .
Yet prosecutors today argued that , in reality , he would be unlikely to serve a sentence anything like as long .
And while Assange ’ s father John Shipton said , “ the entire indictment would allow for somebody to be arrested for reading ” leaked documents , prosecutors argued there was no threat whatsoever to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ team feels they have been fighting this case with not one , but both hands tied behind their back .
They were barred from meeting with their client until the day of the trial , while judge Vanessa Baraitser has made a number of decisions that have led many to question her impartiality .
For instance , she rejected 89-year-old defense witness Daniel Ellsberg ’ s request to speak at a time any later than 6:30 a.m .
Earlier this week , she also reportedly threatened to remove Assange from his own trial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ This is not due process .
It is due revenge , ” wrote veteran journalist John Pilger .
The majority of the charges against Assange , an Australian citizen living on the other side of the world at the time of the incidents , criminalize the act of cultivating leaks from sources and receiving classified or stolen documents , something which is the lifeblood of investigative journalism .
It is for this reason that longtime activist and political scientist Noam Chomsky remarked that , Assange has also received support from NSA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ popular podcast host Joe Rogan that , Snowden was referencing the Iraq and Afghanistan War logs , the 2010 release of hundreds of thousands of military documents exposing U.S. malfeasance in those two countries .
Perhaps the most famous leak was the infamous “ Collateral Murder ” video , which showed footage of American helicopter pilots casually carrying out a massacre of Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in 2007 , two of whom were Reuters-employed journalists .
Assange has been wanted since the war logs were published .
In 2010 , a Swedish prosecutor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on sexual assault charges .
Fearing it was a pretext for extradition to the United States , he sought and was given refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London by the progressive administration of Rafael Correa .
After a change of government in Ecuador , however , he was arrested after seven years inside the building .
Since then , he has been kept in Belmarsh prison in London , where he was often kept in solitary confinement , a practice denounced as torture by human rights groups and international organizations like the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poor that other high security inmates in the notorious prison staged a protest , leading to somewhat more ethical treatment .
Assange ’ s father said that it had been a “ strong day ” for his son in court .
But it remains far from clear how the trial will proceed .
Meanwhile , Assange supporters continue their attempts successfully to keep Assange from being extradited to the US to face bogus charges against him because he worked to expose the crimes of our own government against us .
The Trump DOJ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government who actually committed crimes .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

The media has largely been silent over Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange following his arrest. They dragged his name through the mud, said he should have a bullet put in his head and attacked him relentlessly… and so did politicians. Now, it appears that during his trial, human rights groups are being blocked from monitoring what is going on. Why is that and what is being hidden from the public?
Alan Macleod has the story from MintPress News.
The high profile extradition hearing of publisher and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange continued in Central London today. But it did so without oversight from international human rights groups. Julia Hall, an expert on criminal justice and human rights for Amnesty International, revealed that her organization was again denied entry to the court today, despite their repeated requests to be recognized as fair trial monitors.
Fair trial monitors are a critical component to upholding transparency and regulation in courtrooms across the world, reminding authorities that independent witnesses are scrutinizing them. Hall noted that Amnesty monitors have been recognized as international fair trial monitors for cases in many repressive states, including Bahrain and Turkey, and even oversaw cases at Guantanamo Bay. “It is a disgrace that the UK has failed to recognize that international fair trial monitors should be officially recognized and permitted access to the Assange hearings. Open justice is not served by this failure, it is profoundly undermined,” she wrote.
Amnesty International’s Europe Director, Nils Muižnieks, described the hearing as a “full-scale assault on the right to freedom of expression,” noting that if he were prosecuted, it would have a “chilling effect on media freedom, leading publishers and journalists to self-censor in fear of retaliation.” Hall added that it was not only Assange who was on trial but the fundamental tenets of media freedom. Amnesty also warned that an international smear campaign against him had threatened his right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Britain would also be breaking its obligation to international human rights law by transferring the Australian to a known human rights abusing nation, according to the organization.
1/ .@amnesty denied access again today to the court in the #Assange extradition hearing. We've made 3 applications requesting recognition as expert fair trial monitors. Judge states that no "special provision" will be made for our trial monitor's attendance. pic.twitter.com/psQ53H4aKU — Julia Hall (@JuliaHall18) September 16, 2020
Assange is charged with violating the US Espionage Act and 17 counts of publishing secret American government information. If extradited from the United Kingdom, he faces up to 175 years in a supermax prison in Florence, Colorado, described as the only “black site” on U.S. soil. Yet prosecutors today argued that, in reality, he would be unlikely to serve a sentence anything like as long. And while Assange’s father John Shipton said, “the entire indictment would allow for somebody to be arrested for reading” leaked documents, prosecutors argued there was no threat whatsoever to the First Amendment.
Assange’s defense team feels they have been fighting this case with not one, but both hands tied behind their back. They were barred from meeting with their client until the day of the trial, while judge Vanessa Baraitser has made a number of decisions that have led many to question her impartiality. For instance, she rejected 89-year-old defense witness Daniel Ellsberg’s request to speak at a time any later than 6:30 a.m. Earlier this week, she also reportedly threatened to remove Assange from his own trial if he cast doubt upon its legitimacy. “This is not due process. It is due revenge,” wrote veteran journalist John Pilger.
Today in the Old Bailey I watched the grim farce of the US/UK attempt to extradite Julian #Assange. The bullying prosecutor is reduced to insulting the integrity of expert witnesses. Trapped behind glass, Julian is denied free access to his barrister. This is Britain's shame. — John Pilger (@johnpilger) September 14, 2020
The majority of the charges against Assange, an Australian citizen living on the other side of the world at the time of the incidents, criminalize the act of cultivating leaks from sources and receiving classified or stolen documents, something which is the lifeblood of investigative journalism. It is for this reason that longtime activist and political scientist Noam Chomsky remarked that,
Not only is Julian Assange’s fate at risk in this sordid affair, but so is that of journalism, freedom of speech, and democratic rights [more] generally. We can’t stand by and permit this monstrous offense against our highest values to proceed.”
Assange has also received support from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, who yesterday told popular podcast host Joe Rogan that,
The US government under William Barr is trying to extradite this guy and put him in prison for the rest of his life for the best work that Wikileaks ever did, that has won awards in basically every country, including the United States.”
Snowden was referencing the Iraq and Afghanistan War logs, the 2010 release of hundreds of thousands of military documents exposing U.S. malfeasance in those two countries. Perhaps the most famous leak was the infamous “Collateral Murder” video, which showed footage of American helicopter pilots casually carrying out a massacre of Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in 2007, two of whom were Reuters-employed journalists.
Assange has been wanted since the war logs were published. In 2010, a Swedish prosecutor issued an international arrest warrant for him on sexual assault charges. Fearing it was a pretext for extradition to the United States, he sought and was given refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London by the progressive administration of Rafael Correa. After a change of government in Ecuador, however, he was arrested after seven years inside the building.
Since then, he has been kept in Belmarsh prison in London, where he was often kept in solitary confinement, a practice denounced as torture by human rights groups and international organizations like the United Nations. His treatment was so poor that other high security inmates in the notorious prison staged a protest, leading to somewhat more ethical treatment.
Assange’s father said that it had been a “strong day” for his son in court. But it remains far from clear how the trial will proceed.
Meanwhile, Assange supporters continue their attempts successfully to keep Assange from being extradited to the US to face bogus charges against him because he worked to expose the crimes of our own government against us. The Trump DOJ is silent about actually arresting those in government who actually committed crimes.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-17--In The End, The Rioters Are Obama’s Army

If Hillary Clinton had been elected as our president in 2016 and was seeking reelection in November , George Floyd would probably still have met his unfortunate end on May 25 in Minneapolis after a police officer kneeled on his neck during his arrest .
Video footage of the incident would still have elicited outrage and touched off demonstrations – but that ’ s where the similarity to actual events would have ended .
Had Hillary Clinton been our president , when it became clear that the officers involved in Floyd ’ s death were to be prosecuted , any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down and the focus would have been on those prosecutions .
Incidents such as the tragic death of Breonna Taylor , who was fatally shot by police in her Louisville , Kentucky , apartment six months ago following the horribly flawed execution of a no-knock warrant would have been handled through quiet legal diplomacy and the rule of law .
Why such a different outcome with only the replacement of a chief executive ?
The answer is simple : If Hillary Clinton were our president and facing re-election , the radicals who have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ six months would have been ordered to stand down – or more accurately , they never would have been given their marching orders to start with .
In a new series on Fox Nation ( a Fox News streaming service ) , veteran journalist Lara Logan examines the rise of socialism in America in recent years .
In the program , Logan discusses the case of George Floyd and the rioting that followed his death .
“ With tragedy came opportunity for the socialist resistance on the left , a moment for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ready , ” Logan says in the series .
But why were they ready ?
It occurs to me that the average lazy suburban white kid – or nonwhite kid , for that matter – who happens to be a fan of “ democratic socialism ” but who has a job or an education they ’ re pursuing has neither the time nor the inclination to become a domestic terrorist due to outrage over the wrongful death of one black man at the hands of police .
Nor is it likely that thousands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and take to the streets , giving rise to the protracted civil unrest we ’ re witnessing today .
On Monday , conservative radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh took a call from an individual who claimed that the aforementioned civil unrest and escalating racial tension we ’ re seeing had their genesis in the administration of Barack Hussein Obama .
Although I ’ m sure Mr. Limbaugh knew full well what the caller was getting at , he asked that this individual explain himself for the edification of his audience .
It was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s explanation , because I ’ ve maintained for a long time that far too few Americans have acknowledged the truth of this argument .
As I ’ ve said more than once in this space , and as I chronicled in real time , Obama dedicatedly strove to compromise race relations in this country almost from the moment he took office .
From claiming that Cambridge , Massachusetts , police “ acted stupidly ” when they arrested his Harvard mentor Henry Louis Gates Jr. , to Eric Holder ’ s Justice Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown , to emboldening radical factions like the New Black Panther Party ( with whom Obama marched prior to running for president ) , the rhetoric and actions emanating from the Obama White House could only be characterized as sabotage .
Obama ’ s ongoing narrative of America having remained an institutionally racist nation , despite 60 years of social and economic progress in this area , was parroted by the establishment press , Democrats and the entertainment industry for eight long years , souring race relations and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we now see being played out across our country .
So , when people say that Barack Obama set race relations back decades – and many do – this is not hyperbole .
The fact that he performed this function is simply not open for debate .
We now have a generation of young black people who grew up during the years of his presidency and who literally believe that blacks are no better off now than they were in 1955 .
Even those who have fared exceptionally well seem to think that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ systemic racism.
” While there are some in Washington who are calling for investigations into the organizational structure and funding of groups engaging in nationwide rioting , any such inquiries are likely to extend well into President Trump ’ s next term .
I would wager that the more powerful the individuals and agencies involved in the facilitation of these violent demonstrations , the less likely that any of them will be brought to justice .
Every American should be heartsick at the extent to which young black minds have been poisoned by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , those electing to participate in rioting and mayhem in our cities from this point forward should be considered enemy combatants in a civil insurrection , and should be dispatched accordingly , regardless of ethnicity .

“We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the military].” – Barack Obama, 2008
If Hillary Clinton had been elected as our president in 2016 and was seeking reelection in November, George Floyd would probably still have met his unfortunate end on May 25 in Minneapolis after a police officer kneeled on his neck during his arrest. Video footage of the incident would still have elicited outrage and touched off demonstrations – but that’s where the similarity to actual events would have ended.
Had Hillary Clinton been our president, when it became clear that the officers involved in Floyd’s death were to be prosecuted, any protests that had arisen would have died down and the focus would have been on those prosecutions. Incidents such as the tragic death of Breonna Taylor, who was fatally shot by police in her Louisville, Kentucky, apartment six months ago following the horribly flawed execution of a no-knock warrant would have been handled through quiet legal diplomacy and the rule of law.
Why such a different outcome with only the replacement of a chief executive? The answer is simple: If Hillary Clinton were our president and facing re-election, the radicals who have been terrorizing our cities for the past six months would have been ordered to stand down – or more accurately, they never would have been given their marching orders to start with.
In a new series on Fox Nation (a Fox News streaming service), veteran journalist Lara Logan examines the rise of socialism in America in recent years. In the program, Logan discusses the case of George Floyd and the rioting that followed his death.
“With tragedy came opportunity for the socialist resistance on the left, a moment for their own Marxist revolution, and they were ready,” Logan says in the series.
But why were they ready?
It occurs to me that the average lazy suburban white kid – or nonwhite kid, for that matter – who happens to be a fan of “democratic socialism” but who has a job or an education they’re pursuing has neither the time nor the inclination to become a domestic terrorist due to outrage over the wrongful death of one black man at the hands of police. Nor is it likely that thousands of their like-minded peers would organically mobilize and take to the streets, giving rise to the protracted civil unrest we’re witnessing today.
On Monday, conservative radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh took a call from an individual who claimed that the aforementioned civil unrest and escalating racial tension we’re seeing had their genesis in the administration of Barack Hussein Obama. Although I’m sure Mr. Limbaugh knew full well what the caller was getting at, he asked that this individual explain himself for the edification of his audience.
It was somewhat gratifying to hear this person’s explanation, because I’ve maintained for a long time that far too few Americans have acknowledged the truth of this argument.
As I’ve said more than once in this space, and as I chronicled in real time, Obama dedicatedly strove to compromise race relations in this country almost from the moment he took office. From claiming that Cambridge, Massachusetts, police “acted stupidly” when they arrested his Harvard mentor Henry Louis Gates Jr., to Eric Holder’s Justice Department advancing a racism narrative in the cases of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, to emboldening radical factions like the New Black Panther Party (with whom Obama marched prior to running for president), the rhetoric and actions emanating from the Obama White House could only be characterized as sabotage.
Obama’s ongoing narrative of America having remained an institutionally racist nation, despite 60 years of social and economic progress in this area, was parroted by the establishment press, Democrats and the entertainment industry for eight long years, souring race relations and setting the stage for the tragic comedy we now see being played out across our country.
So, when people say that Barack Obama set race relations back decades – and many do – this is not hyperbole. The fact that he performed this function is simply not open for debate. We now have a generation of young black people who grew up during the years of his presidency and who literally believe that blacks are no better off now than they were in 1955. Even those who have fared exceptionally well seem to think that they’ve suffered somehow under “systemic racism.”
While there are some in Washington who are calling for investigations into the organizational structure and funding of groups engaging in nationwide rioting, any such inquiries are likely to extend well into President Trump’s next term. I would wager that the more powerful the individuals and agencies involved in the facilitation of these violent demonstrations, the less likely that any of them will be brought to justice.
Every American should be heartsick at the extent to which young black minds have been poisoned by socialists. In practical terms, however, those electing to participate in rioting and mayhem in our cities from this point forward should be considered enemy combatants in a civil insurrection, and should be dispatched accordingly, regardless of ethnicity.
Article posted with permission from Erik Rush


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-17--New Hampshire:  Transgender Satanist Anarchist Wins Primary For County Sheriff… & He’s The GOP Candi

New Hampshire:  Transgender Satanist Anarchist Wins Primary For County Sheriff… & He’s The GOP Candidate

This will become more and more prevalent as the Republican Party fails to stand by it ’ s self-proclaimed platform and begins embracing sodomites , lesbians and while claiming it is pro-life continues on the path of “ regulating ” abortion rather than abolishing it .
A man who dresses as a woman , identifies as a satanist and anarchist and loudly proclaimed “ F*** the police !
” has now won the GOP primaries for county sheriff .
Aria DiMezzo won GOP bid for sheriff of Cheshire County , New Hampshire .
‘ I can ’ t imagine they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Aria DiMezzo told Inside Sources when asked about the reaction from Republicans .
DiMezzo captured the GOP nomination for Cheshire County sheriff on Tuesday night after she ran unopposed in the party primary .
She won despite the fact that she received no support from the county or state GOP .
DiMezzo will have an even more formidable task as she will face off against a four-term incumbent , the Democrat Eli Rivera .
The head of the Cheshire County Republican Party , Marylin Huston , misgendered DiMezzo by referring to her as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
‘ He did very well with the primary and that was wonderful , ’ Huston said .
DiMezzo is a member of a group of Libertarian activists known as the Free Keene group .
During the recent GOP primary for governor , the group backed Rich Paul , who legally changed his name to Nobody .
Nobody lost the primary on Tuesday to the Republican incumbent , Governor Chris Sununu .
Last year , Nobody lost his bid to become mayor of Keene .
The “ she ” should actually be “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pretending with these mentally ill people .
I ’ ll at least give credit to Huston for properly labeling the gender of Nobody .
Listen to this nonsense , and keep in mind , this is why I say that if a person is a Libertarian that adheres to God ’ s law , that is fine , but those apart from the law of God who claim to be Libertarian are , in fact , practicing Satanists ( Do what thou wilt will be the whole of the law ) .
Do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not adhere to the standards of the law , namely God ’ s law ?
You invited every “ dirty bird ” ( Revelation 18:2 ) into the mix .
By the way , who in that county voted for this degenerate ?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

This will become more and more prevalent as the Republican Party fails to stand by it’s self-proclaimed platform and begins embracing sodomites, lesbians and while claiming it is pro-life continues on the path of “regulating” abortion rather than abolishing it. A man who dresses as a woman, identifies as a satanist and anarchist and loudly proclaimed “F*** the police!” has now won the GOP primaries for county sheriff.
Aria DiMezzo won GOP bid for sheriff of Cheshire County, New Hampshire.
The Daily Mail reports:
‘I can’t imagine they’re happy about this,’ Aria DiMezzo told Inside Sources when asked about the reaction from Republicans.
DiMezzo captured the GOP nomination for Cheshire County sheriff on Tuesday night after she ran unopposed in the party primary.
She won despite the fact that she received no support from the county or state GOP.
DiMezzo will have an even more formidable task as she will face off against a four-term incumbent, the Democrat Eli Rivera.
The head of the Cheshire County Republican Party, Marylin Huston, misgendered DiMezzo by referring to her as ‘he’ when she offered congratulations.
‘He did very well with the primary and that was wonderful,’ Huston said.
DiMezzo is a member of a group of Libertarian activists known as the Free Keene group.
During the recent GOP primary for governor, the group backed Rich Paul, who legally changed his name to Nobody.
Nobody lost the primary on Tuesday to the Republican incumbent, Governor Chris Sununu.
Last year, Nobody lost his bid to become mayor of Keene.
The “she” should actually be “he,” Daily Mail. Stop pretending with these mentally ill people. I’ll at least give credit to Huston for properly labeling the gender of Nobody.
Listen to this nonsense, and keep in mind, this is why I say that if a person is a Libertarian that adheres to God’s law, that is fine, but those apart from the law of God who claim to be Libertarian are, in fact, practicing Satanists (Do what thou wilt will be the whole of the law).
Do you see what happens when you will not adhere to the standards of the law, namely God’s law? You invited every “dirty bird” (Revelation 18:2) into the mix. By the way, who in that county voted for this degenerate?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media