thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--Joe Biden’s Sister, Valerie, Sent Million$ from Campaign Funds to Her Own Consulting Firm

Joe Biden ’ s Sister , Valerie , Sent Million $ from Campaign Funds to Her Own Consulting Firm We reported recently on two Biden Brothers ’ corruption .
• Frank Biden , Joe ’ s Brother , Linked to Projects That Received $ 54 Million from Obama Administration , NO EXPERIENCE • Nothing to See Here !
Joe Biden ’ s Brother ’ s Firm Got $ 1.5 Billion in Government Contracts The second story above is about JAMES BIDEN , not FRANK .
So we have two brothers and their nephew , Hunter , gaining dollars through corruption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AGAIN , it ’ s Breitbart who has the story of Biden Family corruption .
Valerie Biden Owens , the sister of former vice president Joe Biden ( D ) , who served as the campaign manager for his past presidential campaigns , directed $ 2.5 million from “ Citizens for Biden ” and “ Biden for President Inc. ” to her own consulting firm during her brother ’ s 2008 presidential bid alone , Breitbart senior contributor and Government Accountability Institute ( GAI ) President Peter Schweizer ’ s investigative blockbuster Profiles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ America ’ s Progressive Elite reveals .
Biden ’ s political tenure , as Schweizer ’ s book extensively details , has largely remained a complicated family affair , resulting in little-known financial benefits for not just his son Hunter Biden , but for his sister Valerie .
Her role as a senior partner in the political messaging firm Slade White & Company coincided with her participation in Biden ’ s various political campaigns .
She was only one of two executives – the other being Joe Slade White – at the firm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for 15 years .
However , the lines between her role as leading her brother ’ s political campaigns and working at the firm blurred , as the firm “ received large fees from the Biden campaigns that Valerie was running , ” Profiles in Corruption reveals : The report demonstrates a pattern , as Schweizer ’ s book shows , of the complex , albeit largely unknown , dynamics of the Biden family and the financial benefits reaped , which purportedly stem from the presidential hopeful ’ s varying positions in government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a few disparate enterprises , but rather moneymaking ventures that appear to be part of a well-organized family business , ” Profiles in Corruption details .
Biden has previously denied , particularly on the campaign trail , the allegations that his family members have cashed out in various ways over the course of his political career .
“ I ’ ve never discussed with my son or my brother , or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses , period , ” Biden told reporters in August 2019 amid further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political leverage for personal gain .
“ As we will see , this is an impossibility , “ Schweizer writes .
The latest revelation , detailing Valerie ’ s direction of millions of her brother ’ s campaign dollars to her consulting firm , follows the eye-opening discoveries detailed in Schweizer ’ s New York Times # 1 bestseller Secret Empires , which effectively “ blew the lid off the Biden-Burisma scandal in Ukraine , wherein Hunter Biden made up to $ 83,000 a month with Ukrainian energy giant Burisma as his father @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” as Breitbart News detailed .
I can ’ t speak for anyone else but I am long overdue for buying Schweizer ’ s book .
Both of those stories about Biden ’ s brothers came from Schweizer ’ s book .
But then again , Joe Biden has proven to be crooked for a long damn time .
• The Forgotten Lie That Joe Biden Repeated for Over 35 Years So , if Joe has been a known crook and liar for over 30 years , should current Biden controversies really surprise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Helped Con Native Americans Out of $ 60 Million , Also Involved in $ 150 Million Ukraine Counterfeiting Scheme • The Millions The Bidens Took From Ukraine Pale in Comparison to The $ 130 Million Rip Off They Pulled on AMERICANS • China Gave Biden ’ s Son $ 1.5 Billion For Startup in Industry He Had No Previous Experience In and That Included the Nephew of a Mobster… Please note that Biden scams extend far beyond their dealings in Ukraine .
The Bidens should be in one of those family prisons .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they had those in Germany once upon a time .
Let ’ s not send them to the gas chambers , but how about we at least put their butts on trial and make them answer for all of this criminal nonsense ?
Unfortunately , that doesn ’ t happen much in America .
But it should .

Joe Biden’s Sister, Valerie, Sent Million$ from Campaign Funds to Her Own Consulting Firm
We reported recently on two Biden Brothers’ corruption.
The second story above is about JAMES BIDEN, not FRANK.
So we have two brothers and their nephew, Hunter, gaining dollars through corruption but what about the Biden women?
AGAIN, it’s Breitbart who has the story of Biden Family corruption.
Valerie Biden Owens, the sister of former vice president Joe Biden (D), who served as the campaign manager for his past presidential campaigns, directed $2.5 million from “Citizens for Biden” and “Biden for President Inc.” to her own consulting firm during her brother’s 2008 presidential bid alone, Breitbart senior contributor and Government Accountability Institute (GAI) President Peter Schweizer’s investigative blockbuster Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite reveals.
Biden’s political tenure, as Schweizer’s book extensively details, has largely remained a complicated family affair, resulting in little-known financial benefits for not just his son Hunter Biden, but for his sister Valerie.
Her role as a senior partner in the political messaging firm Slade White & Company coincided with her participation in Biden’s various political campaigns. She was only one of two executives – the other being Joe Slade White – at the firm and has remained the Executive Vice President for 15 years.
However, the lines between her role as leading her brother’s political campaigns and working at the firm blurred, as the firm “received large fees from the Biden campaigns that Valerie was running,” Profiles in Corruption reveals:
THE FIRM RECEIVED LARGE FEES FROM THE BIDEN CAMPAIGNS THAT VALERIE WAS RUNNING. TWO AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS IN CONSULTING FEES FLOWED TO HER FIRM FROM CITIZENS FOR BIDEN AND BIDEN FOR PRESIDENT INC. DURING THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL BID ALONE. KEEP IN MIND THAT JOE SLADE WHITE & COMPANY WORKED FOR BIDEN CAMPAIGNS OVER EIGHTEEN YEARS.
The report demonstrates a pattern, as Schweizer’s book shows, of the complex, albeit largely unknown, dynamics of the Biden family and the financial benefits reaped, which purportedly stem from the presidential hopeful’s varying positions in government throughout his life.
“These are not a few disparate enterprises, but rather moneymaking ventures that appear to be part of a well-organized family business,” Profiles in Corruption details.
Biden has previously denied, particularly on the campaign trail, the allegations that his family members have cashed out in various ways over the course of his political career.
“I’ve never discussed with my son or my brother, or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses, period,” Biden told reporters in August 2019 amid further allegations of his family members using his political leverage for personal gain.
“As we will see, this is an impossibility, “ Schweizer writes.
The latest revelation, detailing Valerie’s direction of millions of her brother’s campaign dollars to her consulting firm, follows the eye-opening discoveries detailed in Schweizer’s New York Times #1 bestseller Secret Empires, which effectively “blew the lid off the Biden-Burisma scandal in Ukraine, wherein Hunter Biden made up to $83,000 a month with Ukrainian energy giant Burisma as his father led U.S.-Ukraine policy while vice president,” as Breitbart News detailed.
Read the rest…
#####
I can’t speak for anyone else but I am long overdue for buying Schweizer’s book.
Both of those stories about Biden’s brothers came from Schweizer’s book.
But then again, Joe Biden has proven to be crooked for a long damn time.
So, if Joe has been a known crook and liar for over 30 years, should current Biden controversies really surprise us?
Please note that Biden scams extend far beyond their dealings in Ukraine.
The Bidens should be in one of those family prisons.
They have those right?
Oh yeah, they had those in Germany once upon a time.
Let’s not send them to the gas chambers, but how about we at least put their butts on trial and make them answer for all of this criminal nonsense?
Unfortunately, that doesn’t happen much in America.
But it should.
Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-29--Dianne Feinstein’s Shock Quote on Impeachment: “Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We

Dianne Feinstein ’ s Shock Quote on Impeachment : “ Nine months left to go , the people should judge .
We are a republic , we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge.
” Editor ’ s Note : Feinstein is half right here .
We are a Republic , but we are not based on the will of the people .
We are based on the rule of law .
The will of the people fluctuates in and out of law , but the law is supposed to stand regardless of emotions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ men .
She knows they pushed to far in all of this and now , she ’ s turning it to politics and an election to save face .
Additionally , it is the Senate ’ s job to judge in impeachment on behalf of the people .
Senator Feinstein , like it or not , you are to judge .
At one point on Tuesday Senator Dianne Feinstein was surprisingly open-minded and fair .
She was leaning toward acquittal and deferring to her constituents to pass judgment in 2020 elections .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that was indeed her take .
By the end of the day her tune had , not surprisingly , changed .
The Democrats sure didn ’ t expect this !
Following the Trump attorneys ’ closing statements on Tuesday Senator Feinstein told reporters she was leaning toward President Trump ’ s acquittal .
Feinstein told reporters , “ Nine months left to go , the people should judge .
We are a republic , we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge.
” Just after President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their Senate trial Tuesday , Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California became the first Democrat to suggest that she could vote to acquit him , despite serious concerns about his character .
“ Nine months left to go , the people should judge .
We are a republic , we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge , ” Feinstein said Tuesday , after the president ’ s team finished a three-day presentation in his defense .
“ That was my view and it still is my view.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ take long — the Mob got to DiFi .
Yes , it was predictable .
The beginning wasn ’ t but the ending was .
Dianne Feinstein is a tool who has , allegedly , put our national security at risk many times .
So why wouldn ’ t she turn against Trump ?
• Feinstein Tries to Destroy Nunes FISA Memo and Soon Regrets it After Horowitz Report Confirms Almost All of It • BUSTED : Feinstein Caught In Treasonous Lie About Secret Iran Meeting — It Was NOT Sanctioned • LOCK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violate The Logan Act while Conversing with Iran ’ s Foreign Minister ?
• AOC & Feinstein calling for New Zealand-style nationwide gun confiscation and mass criminalization of gun owners across America • Espionage by China exploited Hillary Clinton and Dianne Feinstein security lapses to identify and murder of 20 CIA operatives • President Trump Asks if Dianne Feinstein will “ Investigate Herself ” over Chinese Spy that she Employed for 20 Years Feinstein has proven once again what she is made of .
As one of the richest people in the Senate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tune came without a high price .
Oh wait , she says The Los Angeles Times misunderstood her .
I ’ m not one to defend The L.A. Times , but does anyone really believe that ?

Dianne Feinstein’s Shock Quote on Impeachment: “Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge.”
Editor’s Note: Feinstein is half right here. We are a Republic, but we are not based on the will of the people. We are based on the rule of law. The will of the people fluctuates in and out of law, but the law is supposed to stand regardless of emotions and other whimsical, fleeting moments of men. She knows they pushed to far in all of this and now, she’s turning it to politics and an election to save face. Additionally, it is the Senate’s job to judge in impeachment on behalf of the people. Senator Feinstein, like it or not, you are to judge.
At one point on Tuesday Senator Dianne Feinstein was surprisingly open-minded and fair.
She was leaning toward acquittal and deferring to her constituents to pass judgment in 2020 elections.
That sounds too logical for Feinstein, but that was indeed her take.
By the end of the day her tune had, not surprisingly, changed.
Here’s more from Gateway Pundit:
The Democrats sure didn’t expect this!
Following the Trump attorneys’ closing statements on Tuesday Senator Feinstein told reporters she was leaning toward President Trump’s acquittal.
Feinstein suggest she is leaning towards acquitting Trump in the impeachment trial. https://t.co/RDcapUkXse — John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) January 28, 2020
Feinstein told reporters, “Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge.”
The LA Times reported:
Just after President Trump’s defense lawyers ended arguments in their Senate trial Tuesday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California became the first Democrat to suggest that she could vote to acquit him, despite serious concerns about his character.
“Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge,” Feinstein said Tuesday, after the president’s team finished a three-day presentation in his defense. “That was my view and it still is my view.”
UPDATE — That didn’t take long — the Mob got to DiFi.
The LA Times misunderstood what I said today. Before the trial I said I'd keep an open mind. Now that both sides made their cases, it’s clear the president’s actions were wrong. He withheld vital foreign assistance for personal political gain. That can’t be allowed to stand. — Senator Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) January 28, 2020
That was predictable.
#####
Yes, it was predictable.
The beginning wasn’t but the ending was.
Dianne Feinstein is a tool who has, allegedly, put our national security at risk many times.
So why wouldn’t she turn against Trump?
Feinstein has proven once again what she is made of.
As one of the richest people in the Senate it is doubtful that her change in tune came without a high price.
Oh wait, she says The Los Angeles Times misunderstood her.
I’m not one to defend The L.A. Times, but does anyone really believe that?
Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-30--USMCA Was Not Trump’s Idea – Study Shows 57% Of It Contains TPP That He Opposed

USMCA Was Not Trump ’ s Idea – Study Shows 57 % Of It Contains TPP That He Opposed America has been sold out through Hegelian Dialectic , only it wasn ’ t just one step back and two steps forward , it was a giant leap forward when President Donald Trump advance the United States Mexico Canada Agreement ( USMCA ) and began its implementation with fellow traitors of America on Wednesday , January 29 , 2010 .
The Common Core Diva Lynne Taylor and I commented on the live festivities of naming the traitors in collusion with Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ USMCA would be without telling you he and Congress sold you old for thirty pieces of silver , along with American sovereignty .
We have also covered several segments on how this unconstitutional treaty effects the areas of education .
However , it isn ’ t just in education .
As previous interviews indicate , the USMCA sells out America to the United Nations and global government .
Now , while President Donald Trump did take us out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership , the Paris Accord and snuffed NAFTA , but was it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Hegelian Dialectic with a huge leap forward by wrapping them and much more up in the USMCA ?
I think it was .
According to the New American : According to a study conducted by researchers from the University of Ottawa ( often referred to as OttawaU ) , 57 percent of the text of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement ( USMCA ) is copied from the Trans-Pacific Partnership ( TPP ) .
Ironically , President Trump has repeatedly described the TPP as a “ horrible deal.
” The study , entitled “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement ?
” was published on June 26 , 2019 .
It has since received little attention from the media , mentioned only as a blurb in Politico ’ s “ Morning Trade , ” earlier this month .
A copy of the study in its entirety was found tucked away on the American Chamber of Commerce Vietnam ( AmCham ) website .
Comparing the USMCA to existing free trade agreements , researchers found : “ The USMCA closely tracks the structure and text of the TPP .
29 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the USMCA and 72 percent of the articles in the matched USMCA chapters are found in both agreements.
” In other words , not only are many of the chapter titles identical , but so are the various articles and clauses contained in them .
“ Furthermore , when looked at in the context of all U.S. trade agreements , the USMCA and TPP , based on their textual similarity , appear as belonging to the same generation of treaties .
In other words , the USMCA , contrary to Trump ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fundamental rupture in U.S. practice and has more in common with the TPP than not , ” the study stated .
Conducting a high-level textual analysis of the text of the USMCA compared to previous trade agreements , the researchers found that the USMCA “ continues rather than breaks with existing practice.
” This runs in stark contrast to claims by both Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer that the USMCA represents a “ new paradigm shift ” in the way the United States will conduct future trade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there are “ features in the USMCA that align more comfortably with pre-Trump U.S. policies and ultimately the ‘ Establishment Narrative , ’ ” a term coined by Nicolas Lamp , a former dispute settlement lawyer at the Appellate Body Secretariat of the World Trade Organization ( WTO ) .
According to the study , “ Lamp identifies an ‘ Establishment Narrative , ’ which dominates trade textbooks and — until recently — most trade policymaking.
” This “ Establishment Narrative , ” as both Lamp and the OttawaU study call it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for forging integrated regional blocs and ultimately a one world government via economic liberalization and “ free trade agreements.
” Not only is this the very policy taught in schools and universities , it has also uninterruptedly dominated U.S. trade and foreign policy since 1934 , continuing through the Obama administration ’ s push for the TPP and T-TIP multilateral integration schemes .
Despite all of Trump ’ s anti-globalism , pro- “ Americanism ” rhetoric , his premier trade agreement — the USMCA — for the most part , does not deviate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has come to define U.S. and globalist trade policy .
Using a computerized model to automatically compare the text of the USMCA with a recently created database of 449 trade agreements notified to the WTO , known as the ToTA Corpus ( which stands for Text of Trade Agreements ) , the top 10 trade agreements most resembling the USMCA were all U.S. free trade agreements ; see the table below from the study : In other words , the USMCA could have easily come out of the administrations of Barack Obama , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with only negligible differences .
In fact , others , including former Obama-era high-ranking officials , have noted the striking similarity between the TPP and the USMCA .
Well , there you go , America .
To continue to promote President Donald Trump as being “ America First ” is akin to promoting Benedict Arnold as an American patriot .
Admit you ’ ve been sold out and take the proper action to remove this man from office , along with every criminal representative and senator that voted for it ( Article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Section 5 , Clause 2 , US Constitution ) .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

America has been sold out through Hegelian Dialectic, only it wasn’t just one step back and two steps forward, it was a giant leap forward when President Donald Trump advance the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA) and began its implementation with fellow traitors of America on Wednesday, January 29, 2010.
The Common Core Diva Lynne Taylor and I commented on the live festivities of naming the traitors in collusion with Trump as he crowed about how wonderful the USMCA would be without telling you he and Congress sold you old for thirty pieces of silver, along with American sovereignty.
We have also covered several segments on how this unconstitutional treaty effects the areas of education.
However, it isn’t just in education. As previous interviews indicate, the USMCA sells out America to the United Nations and global government.
Now, while President Donald Trump did take us out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris Accord and snuffed NAFTA, but was it all a show in order to advance the Hegelian Dialectic with a huge leap forward by wrapping them and much more up in the USMCA? I think it was.
According to the New American:
According to a study conducted by researchers from the University of Ottawa (often referred to as OttawaU), 57 percent of the text of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is copied from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Ironically, President Trump has repeatedly described the TPP as a “horrible deal.”
The study, entitled “How much of the Transpacific Partnership is in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement?” was published on June 26, 2019. It has since received little attention from the media, mentioned only as a blurb in Politico’s “Morning Trade,” earlier this month. A copy of the study in its entirety was found tucked away on the American Chamber of Commerce Vietnam (AmCham) website.
Comparing the USMCA to existing free trade agreements, researchers found: “The USMCA closely tracks the structure and text of the TPP. 29 out of 30 TPP chapters have equivalents in the USMCA and 72 percent of the articles in the matched USMCA chapters are found in both agreements.” In other words, not only are many of the chapter titles identical, but so are the various articles and clauses contained in them. “Furthermore, when looked at in the context of all U.S. trade agreements, the USMCA and TPP, based on their textual similarity, appear as belonging to the same generation of treaties. In other words, the USMCA, contrary to Trump’s rhetoric, does not mark a fundamental rupture in U.S. practice and has more in common with the TPP than not,” the study stated.
Conducting a high-level textual analysis of the text of the USMCA compared to previous trade agreements, the researchers found that the USMCA “continues rather than breaks with existing practice.” This runs in stark contrast to claims by both Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer that the USMCA represents a “new paradigm shift” in the way the United States will conduct future trade agreements.
The study further highlighted that there are “features in the USMCA that align more comfortably with pre-Trump U.S. policies and ultimately the ‘Establishment Narrative,’” a term coined by Nicolas Lamp, a former dispute settlement lawyer at the Appellate Body Secretariat of the World Trade Organization (WTO). According to the study, “Lamp identifies an ‘Establishment Narrative,’ which dominates trade textbooks and — until recently — most trade policymaking.” This “Establishment Narrative,” as both Lamp and the OttawaU study call it, is essentially the globalists’ trade agenda for forging integrated regional blocs and ultimately a one world government via economic liberalization and “free trade agreements.” Not only is this the very policy taught in schools and universities, it has also uninterruptedly dominated U.S. trade and foreign policy since 1934, continuing through the Obama administration’s push for the TPP and T-TIP multilateral integration schemes. Despite all of Trump’s anti-globalism, pro-“Americanism” rhetoric, his premier trade agreement — the USMCA — for the most part, does not deviate from the “Establishment Narrative” that has come to define U.S. and globalist trade policy.
Using a computerized model to automatically compare the text of the USMCA with a recently created database of 449 trade agreements notified to the WTO, known as the ToTA Corpus (which stands for Text of Trade Agreements), the top 10 trade agreements most resembling the USMCA were all U.S. free trade agreements; see the table below from the study:
In other words, the USMCA could have easily come out of the administrations of Barack Obama, George W. Bush, or Bill Clinton, with only negligible differences. In fact, others, including former Obama-era high-ranking officials, have noted the striking similarity between the TPP and the USMCA.
Well, there you go, America. To continue to promote President Donald Trump as being “America First” is akin to promoting Benedict Arnold as an American patriot.
Admit you’ve been sold out and take the proper action to remove this man from office, along with every criminal representative and senator that voted for it (Article II, Section 4 & Article I, Section 5, Clause 2, US Constitution).
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-30--USMCA:  The Concluding Crushing Blow

USMCA:  The Concluding Crushing Blow

To my dear Anti Fed Ed Warriors and ardent followers , these past articles in my series “ Crushing Blow ” have been very difficult for me to write .
I ’ ve grieved , cussed , fussed , and , purposed to tell the truth no matter what .
The USMCA shouldn ’ t be happening , but it is .
In 2018 , as a ‘ side event ’ of the G20 ( Group of 20 ) , the US , Mexico , and Canada DID sign the USMCA ( US-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement ) .
The current USMCA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one is the one I gave you the links to in Part One .
Since all 3 nations have previously signed the Agreement , the next step was to get the legislative bodies to set the gears in motion for implementation .
In the US , HR 5430 was the legislative implementation move needed and will become law , once signed .
( presented to President Trump on 1/22/2020 ) Here ’ s an interesting note , though , the 2018 article I ’ ve embedded for you had a headline that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you look at the voting history for HR 5430 , you ’ ll see there was division , just not enough division to protect the American citizens .
Once again , I wonder , as maybe you do , did any of the Congress members READ the Agreement ?
Did they not see the trampling of the U.S. Constitution ?
Did they not notice the overreaches of several UN ( United Nations ) declarations , treaties , agreements , compacts , or other actions ?
Do they not care that the education aspect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system , ditch academics and replace it with SKILL BASED EDUCATION ONLY ?
Warriors , these items are exactly what I ’ ve pointed out to you in each of the previous articles in this series .
We MUST act within our citizens ’ rights to nullify the USMCA .
So , what CAN We the People do ?
According to the U.S .
Constitutional expert lawyer , KrisAnne Hall , her response to me , when I asked her this point blank question is below .
Over on the FFF ( Future @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another U.S .
Constitutional lawyer ( Scott McPherson ) writes , shared how we should protect our freedoms with everything we have .
According to his research , the 2nd Amendment is the key to stopping the US government when it no longer serves the U.S. citizens .
Here ’ s an excerpt from his 2005 article , “ ..to make sure that government would always remain in the hands of the people , the citizen militia — the right of the people to keep and bear arms — was made sacrosanct .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the least understood of all rights mentioned in the Constitution .
Few politicians today have any idea of the true meaning and intent of this provision and are more likely to deride this right either as an archaic and unnecessary remnant of an embarrassing past or , at best , as merely some benign assurance that “ the people ” will be able to go duck hunting .
Neither is true .
The right of the people to keep and bear arms is an important and integral part of what it means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it could be said to represent the most important and integral part of being an American.
” In early January 2020 , Mr. McPherson wrote this most excellent article about nullification and We the People .
His citizen action list contains much of what I ’ ve stated in the past when it comes to fighting back against the CCSS Machine .
Start locally in nullifying .
Stay in like-minded groups .
Look at KrisAnne ’ s quote .
Our governors , state legislators , and , sheriffs should ALL nullify USMCA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : We , as Warriors vs the Core , must be prepared , however , for ‘ when and if ’ our local officials support the USMCA .
Warriors , the USMCA absolutely DOES NOT serve We the People well whatsoever !
As I ’ ve pointed out repeatedly in this 4 part series , the USMCA is 100 % unconstitutional !
KrisAnne Hall has verified that .
The USMCA will NOT protect our 2nd Amendent rights whatsoever , either !
The USMCA does state that our government can use or appoint anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and related activities to adhere to the Agreement .
Does this mean our American government or the yet to be formed Commissions over every aspect of our lives ?
We need to be prepared !
We should ask ourselves this in preparing for what is yet to come .
Do I have a legal right to overthrow my government ?
Do I have a moral right to do so ?
When I searched for that question , I found a professor from the CA Institute of Technology give this answer .
In short @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right , however , the legal right should be used carefully .
No government will allow itself to be attacked , either from its people or other nations .
Be sure to read the other comments , if you like .
There ’ s a US federal law ( 1948 ) against any effort to overthrow government.The law appears to state that even if we talk about it , we can be imprisoned .
However , we , under the Constitution DO have a right to speak .
Our Declaration of Independence isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ give us the ground to stand on when criticizing or getting rid of bad government .
So , our question , as Warriors , what is our duty ?
Our duty should be to do whatever it takes to protect our families .
Our duty should include doing whatever ’ s needed to protect our freedoms .
Our duty includes not kowtowing to unjust or illegally based legislation , laws , agreements , etc .
Our duty should also factor in the reality that many in charge are clueless as to what the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve heard is what they ’ ve been told by mainstream media .
It ’ s our duty to inform them , too .
Former President Kennedy did state that it ’ s not what your country can do for you , it ’ s what you can do for it .
So , Warriors , we ’ ve got plenty to do in nullifying the USMCA and informing those we know , who still are in the dark .
I urge you to take this 4 part series and share it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ picture of the massive loss of freedoms we face under USMCA .
Part Two , gave you the up close look at the increases in data tracking and alignment of skill based labor in education to further embed and force America into the UN ’ s SDGs ( Sustainable Development Goals ) .
Part Three , tied several global groups to the USMCA .
It also proved that the ‘ all education must be aligned to the same standards ’ ( ESSA , Every Student Succeeds Act , 2015 ) is written into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all 4 of these articles , you have access to so many documents to help you arm yourself and others .
Please , USE THEM .
The global workforce web is all but woven around us , we still have enough fight left in us to pull the web back .
As I close out this series , know that I ’ m working on gathering local information to share in the State I live in .
This is a key action step you can use , too .
What information ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the USMCA ’ s UN related mandates kick in .
For example , in NC , we have huge economic gains from the agriculture , forestry , and fishing industries .
Under the USMCA ’ s parameters , many of those jobs tied to the industries will be wiped out to comply with the SDGs .
I ’ ll break it down by each of these industries and show which parts of our State will be hit the worst in each one .
If you ’ d like to know how or where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in your State , let me know .

To my dear Anti Fed Ed Warriors and ardent followers, these past articles in my series “Crushing Blow” have been very difficult for me to write. I’ve grieved, cussed, fussed, and, purposed to tell the truth no matter what. The USMCA shouldn’t be happening, but it is.
In 2018, as a ‘side event’ of the G20 (Group of 20), the US, Mexico, and Canada DID sign the USMCA (US-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement). The current USMCA is an updated version. The current one is the one I gave you the links to in Part One.
Since all 3 nations have previously signed the Agreement, the next step was to get the legislative bodies to set the gears in motion for implementation.
In the US, HR 5430 was the legislative implementation move needed and will become law, once signed. (presented to President Trump on 1/22/2020)
Here’s an interesting note, though, the 2018 article I’ve embedded for you had a headline that the US Congress would be divided. If you look at the voting history for HR 5430, you’ll see there was division, just not enough division to protect the American citizens.
Once again, I wonder, as maybe you do, did any of the Congress members READ the Agreement? Did they not see the trampling of the U.S. Constitution? Did they not notice the overreaches of several UN (United Nations) declarations, treaties, agreements, compacts, or other actions? Do they not care that the education aspect of USMCA will create a modern caste system, ditch academics and replace it with SKILL BASED EDUCATION ONLY?
Warriors, these items are exactly what I’ve pointed out to you in each of the previous articles in this series.
We MUST act within our citizens’ rights to nullify the USMCA.
So, what CAN We the People do?
According to the U.S. Constitutional expert lawyer, KrisAnne Hall, her response to me, when I asked her this point blank question is below.
Over on the FFF (Future of Freedom Foundation) blog, where another U.S. Constitutional lawyer (Scott McPherson) writes, shared how we should protect our freedoms with everything we have. According to his research, the 2nd Amendment is the key to stopping the US government when it no longer serves the U.S. citizens.
Here’s an excerpt from his 2005 article, “..to make sure that government would always remain in the hands of the people, the citizen militia — the right of the people to keep and bear arms — was made sacrosanct.
The right to keep and bear arms is the least understood of all rights mentioned in the Constitution. Few politicians today have any idea of the true meaning and intent of this provision and are more likely to deride this right either as an archaic and unnecessary remnant of an embarrassing past or, at best, as merely some benign assurance that “the people” will be able to go duck hunting. Neither is true.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms is an important and integral part of what it means to be an American. In fact, it could be said to represent the most important and integral part of being an American.”
In early January 2020, Mr. McPherson wrote this most excellent article about nullification and We the People.
His citizen action list contains much of what I’ve stated in the past when it comes to fighting back against the CCSS Machine. Start locally in nullifying. Stay in like-minded groups. Look at KrisAnne’s quote. Our governors, state legislators, and, sheriffs should ALL nullify USMCA.
Here’s my researched opinion: We, as Warriors vs the Core, must be prepared, however, for ‘when and if’ our local officials support the USMCA.
Warriors, the USMCA absolutely DOES NOT serve We the People well whatsoever! As I’ve pointed out repeatedly in this 4 part series, the USMCA is 100% unconstitutional! KrisAnne Hall has verified that. The USMCA will NOT protect our 2nd Amendent rights whatsoever, either!
The USMCA does state that our government can use or appoint anyone to enforce their laws, regulations, and related activities to adhere to the Agreement. Does this mean our American government or the yet to be formed Commissions over every aspect of our lives? We need to be prepared!
We should ask ourselves this in preparing for what is yet to come. Do I have a legal right to overthrow my government? Do I have a moral right to do so?
When I searched for that question, I found a professor from the CA Institute of Technology give this answer.
In short, yes, we have a moral right, however, the legal right should be used carefully. No government will allow itself to be attacked, either from its people or other nations. Be sure to read the other comments, if you like.
There’s a US federal law (1948) against any effort to overthrow government.The law appears to state that even if we talk about it, we can be imprisoned. However, we, under the Constitution DO have a right to speak. Our Declaration of Independence isn’t legally binding, but did give us the ground to stand on when criticizing or getting rid of bad government.
So, our question, as Warriors, what is our duty? Our duty should be to do whatever it takes to protect our families. Our duty should include doing whatever’s needed to protect our freedoms. Our duty includes not kowtowing to unjust or illegally based legislation, laws, agreements, etc. Our duty should also factor in the reality that many in charge are clueless as to what the USMCA means. Maybe all they’ve heard is what they’ve been told by mainstream media.
It’s our duty to inform them, too.
Former President Kennedy did state that it’s not what your country can do for you, it’s what you can do for it. So, Warriors, we’ve got plenty to do in nullifying the USMCA and informing those we know, who still are in the dark. I urge you to take this 4 part series and share it.
Part One, gave you an overall picture of the massive loss of freedoms we face under USMCA.
Part Two, gave you the up close look at the increases in data tracking and alignment of skill based labor in education to further embed and force America into the UN’s SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals).
Part Three, tied several global groups to the USMCA. It also proved that the ‘all education must be aligned to the same standards’ (ESSA, Every Student Succeeds Act, 2015) is written into the USMCA and supporting documents.
In all 4 of these articles, you have access to so many documents to help you arm yourself and others. Please, USE THEM. The global workforce web is all but woven around us, we still have enough fight left in us to pull the web back.
As I close out this series, know that I’m working on gathering local information to share in the State I live in. This is a key action step you can use, too.
What information? The economic losses we’ll face when the USMCA’s UN related mandates kick in. For example, in NC, we have huge economic gains from the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industries.
Under the USMCA’s parameters, many of those jobs tied to the industries will be wiped out to comply with the SDGs. I’ll break it down by each of these industries and show which parts of our State will be hit the worst in each one. If you’d like to know how or where you can find this type of information in your State, let me know.
Article posted with permission from Lynne Taylor


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-30--French Intellectual Renaud Camus Sentenced To 2 Months In Prison For Referring To Mass Immigration A

French Intellectual Renaud Camus Sentenced To 2 Months In Prison For Referring To Mass Immigration As “ Invasion ” Don ’ t think this isn ’ t coming to America , especially with the sellout of American sovereignty of the United States Mexico Canada Agreement ( USMCA ) .
French intellectual Renaud Camus was sentenced to two months in prison after he said that mass immigration into Europe was an “ invasion.
” Camus is not alone .
On this site , we have referred to mass immigration into the US as an invasion .
Of course , Camus can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by “ anti-racist ” organizations for 1800 euros .
Those organizations are SOS Racisme and the LICRA ( International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism ) .
Those are the real criminals here , along with the court system .
The writer , who is the author of Le Grand Remplacement ( The Great Replacement ) , was charged with “ public incitement to hate or violence on the basis of origin , ethnicity , nationality , race or religion.
” The conviction stems from a November 2017 speech in Colombey-les-deux Eglises to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Camus declared , “ Immigration has become an invasion.
” “ The irreversible colonization is demographic colonization , by the replacement of the population , ” said the author , adding , “ The ethnic substitution , the great replacement , is the most important event in the history of our nation since it has existed ; as with other people , if the story continues , it will not be that of France.
” Camus also called for a “ national consensus of resistance ” to oppose Islamization in “ the struggle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Celtic , Slavic , Germanic , Greek-Latin , Judeo-Christian.
” The part of Camus ’ speech that specifically garnered the attention of judges was when he talked about European people being replaced .
Camus said mass immigration “ is the substitution , the tendency to substitute everything with its emulator , normalized , standardized , interchangeable : The original with its copy , the authentic with its imitation , the true with the false , the mothers with surrogate mothers , the culture with free time and entertainment.
” France suffers Islamic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it ’ s barely even an important news story anymore .
Many of those terrorists are radicalized by mosques that escape any police scrutiny , but Camus must be punished for his crime of opinion .
This is becoming more and more commonplace in the EU , and don ’ t think it won ’ t happen in the US .
We already have been subjected to the idiotic “ hate crimes ” claims , as if any crime committed occurs as an act of love .
Additionally , social media sites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ targeting people ’ s free speech and determining hate .
I ’ ll have a follow-up article as soon as LinkedIn gets back to me on an article we posted regarding the cultural suicide of Germany in allowing mass Muslim immigration and labeling the article as “ hate speech , ” though no violence or hatred , but rather facts , were presented .
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

French Intellectual Renaud Camus Sentenced To 2 Months In Prison For Referring To Mass Immigration As “Invasion”
Don’t think this isn’t coming to America, especially with the sellout of American sovereignty of the United States Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA). French intellectual Renaud Camus was sentenced to two months in prison after he said that mass immigration into Europe was an “invasion.”
Camus is not alone. On this site, we have referred to mass immigration into the US as an invasion.
Of course, Camus can skirt the prison sentence by being extorted by “anti-racist” organizations for 1800 euros. Those organizations are SOS Racisme and the LICRA (International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism).
Those are the real criminals here, along with the court system.
Infowars reports:
The writer, who is the author of Le Grand Remplacement (The Great Replacement), was charged with “public incitement to hate or violence on the basis of origin, ethnicity, nationality, race or religion.”
The conviction stems from a November 2017 speech in Colombey-les-deux Eglises to the National Council of European Resistance in which Camus declared, “Immigration has become an invasion.”
“The irreversible colonization is demographic colonization, by the replacement of the population,” said the author, adding, “The ethnic substitution, the great replacement, is the most important event in the history of our nation since it has existed; as with other people, if the story continues, it will not be that of France.”
Camus also called for a “national consensus of resistance” to oppose Islamization in “the struggle for the salvation of our common civilization, Celtic, Slavic, Germanic, Greek-Latin, Judeo-Christian.”
The part of Camus’ speech that specifically garnered the attention of judges was when he talked about European people being replaced.
Camus said mass immigration “is the substitution, the tendency to substitute everything with its emulator, normalized, standardized, interchangeable: The original with its copy, the authentic with its imitation, the true with the false, the mothers with surrogate mothers, the culture with free time and entertainment.”
France suffers Islamic terror attacks on such a routine basis that it’s barely even an important news story anymore. Many of those terrorists are radicalized by mosques that escape any police scrutiny, but Camus must be punished for his crime of opinion.
This is becoming more and more commonplace in the EU, and don’t think it won’t happen in the US.
We already have been subjected to the idiotic “hate crimes” claims, as if any crime committed occurs as an act of love.
Additionally, social media sites are all in on the game and targeting people’s free speech and determining hate.
I’ll have a follow-up article as soon as LinkedIn gets back to me on an article we posted regarding the cultural suicide of Germany in allowing mass Muslim immigration and labeling the article as “hate speech,” though no violence or hatred, but rather facts, were presented.
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media