thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-09--Former FDA Director Sharon Hertz Who Approved Dangerous Opioids Killing Hundreds Of Thousands Of Ame

Former FDA Director Sharon Hertz Who Approved Dangerous Opioids Killing Hundreds Of Thousands Of Americans Starts Consulting Business

Why are FDA division heads allowed to approve dangerous opioids killing and addicting in the hundreds of thousands and then start their own consulting businesses ?
Two long-term heads of the FDA in the Division of Anesthesiology , Addiction Medicine , and Pain Medicine have recently terminated their employment with the FDA to start their own consulting business promoting their availability to successfully and efficiently bring pharmaceutical products to market utilizing their FDA expertise .
Below is a Linkedin synopsis of Sharon Hertz , MD and Ellen Fields , MD collaborating in the lucrative private sector using their FDA tenure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hertz and Fields Consulting , Analgesic Drug Development , was incorporated on September 24 , 2019 while both Hertz and Fields were employed by the FDA .
The registered address of the consulting firm is a condo at 7981 Eastern Avenue , # 416 , Silver Spring , Maryland 20910 .
The FDA headquarters is in Silver Spring , Maryland .
This is not the first time the FDA has violated the trust of the American people .
There was the sordid employment of Curtis Wright , MD by the FDA .
For @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MD , he was employed by the FDA from 1989 to October 1997 , including multiple senior scientific positions in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research as Deputy Director and subsequently Acting Director of that division .
Dr. Wright was involved in the review and approval of OxyContin , an opioid manufactured and marketed criminally by Purdue Pharma headquartered in Stamford , Connecticut .
After OxyContin ’ s approval by the FDA , Dr. Curtis subsequently went to work for Purdue Pharma — violating FDA protocol although no action was ever taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I questioned the FDA about their lack of pursuit in the matter , they cited they were not aware that Dr. Wright was working for Purdue Pharma and the statute of limitations had passed for the FDA to take action against Wright .
Strange that it was all over the Internet that Wright was an employee of Purdue Pharma , but the FDA denied knowledge of Wright approving a drug and then working for the drug company .
Conflict of interest ?
Obviously not to the FDA .
Oh and there was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Purdue Pharma .
Interested in the details of that patent ?
It was for a tamper-resistant oral opioid agonist formulation .
The inventors on the patent were a Benjamin Oshlack , a J. David Haddox , MD who when OxyContin was launched tried to convince the medical profession that there was no such thing as “ addiction ” — it was “ pseudo-addiction.
” A word Haddox coined and pushed the medical profession to over-prescribe opioids by minimizing the dangers .
The third individual named on the patent was former FDA employee , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FDA unaccountable to the Secretary of Health & Human Services , Attorneys General or the Department of Justice ?
They certainly are not the watchdog of the American people in their contribution to the opioid epidemic and now further blatant conflicts of interest by Drs .
Hertz and Fields .
Outrage ?
There should be .
Investigative Reporter exposing the manufactured opioid epidemic writing for Global News Centre , Salem-News.com , Sons of Liberty Media , The Washington Standard and Freedom Outpost

Why are FDA division heads allowed to approve dangerous opioids killing and addicting in the hundreds of thousands and then start their own consulting businesses? Two long-term heads of the FDA in the Division of Anesthesiology, Addiction Medicine, and Pain Medicine have recently terminated their employment with the FDA to start their own consulting business promoting their availability to successfully and efficiently bring pharmaceutical products to market utilizing their FDA expertise.
Below is a Linkedin synopsis of Sharon Hertz, MD and Ellen Fields, MD collaborating in the lucrative private sector using their FDA tenure to bring pharmaceutical products to market.
Ellen Fields, MD
Hertz and Fields Consulting, Analgesic Drug Development, was incorporated on September 24, 2019 while both Hertz and Fields were employed by the FDA. The registered address of the consulting firm is a condo at 7981 Eastern Avenue, #416, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. The FDA headquarters is in Silver Spring, Maryland.
This is not the first time the FDA has violated the trust of the American people. There was the sordid employment of Curtis Wright, MD by the FDA.
For those not familiar with Curtis Wright, MD, he was employed by the FDA from 1989 to October 1997, including multiple senior scientific positions in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research as Deputy Director and subsequently Acting Director of that division.
Dr. Wright was involved in the review and approval of OxyContin, an opioid manufactured and marketed criminally by Purdue Pharma headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut. After OxyContin’s approval by the FDA, Dr. Curtis subsequently went to work for Purdue Pharma — violating FDA protocol although no action was ever taken against Wright by the FDA.
When I questioned the FDA about their lack of pursuit in the matter, they cited they were not aware that Dr. Wright was working for Purdue Pharma and the statute of limitations had passed for the FDA to take action against Wright.
Strange that it was all over the Internet that Wright was an employee of Purdue Pharma, but the FDA denied knowledge of Wright approving a drug and then working for the drug company. Conflict of interest? Obviously not to the FDA.
Oh and there was a patent, when Wright was employed by Purdue Pharma. Interested in the details of that patent? It was for a tamper-resistant oral opioid agonist formulation. The inventors on the patent were a Benjamin Oshlack, a J. David Haddox, MD who when OxyContin was launched tried to convince the medical profession that there was no such thing as “addiction” — it was “pseudo-addiction.” A word Haddox coined and pushed the medical profession to over-prescribe opioids by minimizing the dangers. The third individual named on the patent was former FDA employee, Curtis Wright, MD.
Is the FDA unaccountable to the Secretary of Health & Human Services, Attorneys General or the Department of Justice? They certainly are not the watchdog of the American people in their contribution to the opioid epidemic and now further blatant conflicts of interest by Drs. Hertz and Fields. Outrage? There should be.
Marianne Skolek Perez
Investigative Reporter exposing the manufactured opioid epidemic writing for Global News Centre, Salem-News.com, Sons of Liberty Media, The Washington Standard and Freedom Outpost
https://www.judiciary.senate. gov/imo/media/doc/Skolek% 20Testimony%20073107.pdf


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-09--While You’re Distracted By Iran, Senate Committee Passed USMCA – Now Set For Full Floor Vote To Give

While You ’ re Distracted By Iran , Senate Committee Passed USMCA – Now Set For Full Floor Vote To Give Away American Sovereignty While Iran is taking center stage in the news , the US Senate Finance Committee voted to advance the trade treaty , not legislation as it ’ s being touted in the media , known as the US Mexico Canada Agreement by an overwhelming majority to allow for a full vote from the Senate soon .
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement moved closer to a final vote in the Senate , with the Senate Finance Committee advancing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The timing of a vote in the full Senate is uncertain , however .
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said a vote will come after an impeachment trial , but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not yet sent the two articles of impeachment to the Senate .
Republicans Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana , with Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island , voted against the updated North American trade deal .
“ This modernized trilateral trade agreement will open new markets for American exporters , create hundreds of thousands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy and protect U.S. workers , ” Sen. Chuck Grassley , R-Iowa , said in a statement .
USMCA is expected to create around 176,000 new jobs and inject $ 34 billion into the U.S. auto industry , Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told FOX Business ’ Maria Bartiromo last month , citing International Trade Commission data .
He added that as many as 589,000 new jobs could be created within five years .
“ This new NAFTA delivers long-overdue upgrades to labor standards , the environment and digital trade , while providing certainty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hammered in recent years , ” Sen. Ron Wyden , D-Ore. , said .
It requires 75 percent of automobile components be manufactured in the United States , Canada and Mexico in order to avoid tariffs , and that 40 to 45 percent of automobile parts be made by workers who earn at least $ 16 an hour by 2023 .
But at what cost ?
American sovereignty and very specific things outlined in our Constitution .
This is something no one in the media is talking about .
If you have not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the USMCA , constitutional scholar Publius Huldah has outlined exactly how this will begin to set up global government in the Northern Hemisphere .
The USMCA Treaty ( “ Treaty ” ) was negotiated by U.S. Trade Representative , Robert Lighthizer .
He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations , which works to move the United States into the North American Union ( NAU ) .
1 The Treaty advances the economic and regulatory integration of the three Parties .
It is the precursor to the political integration the globalists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Summary of objections to the Treaty Our Constitution and Declaration of Independence are the “ organic law ” of our Land .
3 Treaties , like Acts of Congress , hold a lesser status : they are part of “ the supreme Law of the Land ” only when they are authorized by “ organic law ” – our Constitution ( Art .
VI , cl.2 ) .
4 While the United States is clearly authorized by Art .
I , §8 , cl.3 & Art .
II , §2 , cl.2 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with foreign Nations addressing Commerce ; 5 the United States may not lawfully transfer to global or multi-national bodies , powers which “ WE THE PEOPLE ” delegated to our federal government when We ratified our Constitution .
But that is what the Treaty purports to do .
Even worse , the Treaty also purports to delegate to global or multi-national bodies powers which We never delegated to our federal government – but reserved to the States or the people .
The Treaty establishes a bureaucratic multi-national government which is to control all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United States , Mexico and Canada will be subject .
The Treaty incorporates by reference many other documents .
Its frequent use of new terminology requires one to constantly refer to the various definition sections spread throughout the 34 Chapters .
It engages in the pernicious practice of making a statement , and then qualifying it by phrases such as , “ unless otherwise provided in this Agreement ” and “ unless the Parties decide otherwise ” .
6 • Powers We delegated to our federal government When the People of the United @ @ @ @ @ @ @ created ” the federal government .
Article I created the Legislative Branch and itemized its powers .
Article II created the Executive Branch and itemized its powers .
Article III created the Judicial Branch and itemized its powers .
Each Branch of the federal government is thus a “ creature ” of the Constitution and is completely subject to its terms .
None of the delegated powers may lawfully be re-delegated to global or multi-national bodies .
The Treaty violates the following provisions of our Constitution : • At Art .
I , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all legislative Powers granted by our Constitution .
• At Art .
I , §8 , We granted to Congress the powers o Clause 5 : To coin Money and regulate the Value thereof • At Art .
I , §9 , cl .
1 : Commencing January 1 , 1808 , We granted to Congress the power to control Migration ( immigration ) to the United States .
• At Art .
II , §2 , cl .
2 , We granted to the President the power to make Treaties , provided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• At Art .
III , §2 , cl .
1 , We declared that the judicial Power of the United States shall extend o to all Cases arising under Treaties made under the Authority of the United States o to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party • At Art .
IV , §4 , We imposed upon the United States the duties to : o guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government ; and o protect each of the States against Invasion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cl .
2 , We declared that our Constitution , and Acts of Congress and Treaties authorized by the Constitution , is the “ supreme Law of the Land ” .
• In the 10th Amendment , We declared that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the States or to the people .
Our Constitution delegates to Congress the power to set the amounts of the tariffs on foreign imports .
The Treaty divests Congress of the power to unilaterally determine our tariffs .
USMCA Art @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement , no Party shall increase any existing customs duty , or adopt any new customs duty , on an originating good .
• Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement , each Party shall apply a customs duty on an originating good in accordance with its Schedule to Annex 2-B ( Tariff Commitments ) ” .
Art .
I , §8 , cl .
5 – to coin Money and regulate the Value thereof Our Constitution delegates to Congress the power to control our money.8 But with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congress and Woodrow Wilson unlawfully transferred power over our money to an international cabal of privately owned banks – the “ Federal Reserve ” .
Shortly after WWII , the United States joined the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) .
9 James Perloff ’ s article , Council On Foreign Relations – Influencing American Government , speaks of how the World Bank and IMF act as “ …a loan-guarantee scheme for multinational banks .
When a loan to a foreign country goes awry , the World Bank and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ensuring that the private banks continue to receive interest payments .
Furthermore , the World Bank and IMF dictate conditions to the countries receiving bailouts , thus giving the bankers a measure of political control over indebted nations.
” The Treaty surrenders the United States ’ power over money and our economy to the IMF .
USMCA Art .
33.1 defines “ Article IV Staff Report ” as the report prepared by the IMF respecting a country ’ s adherence to Art .
IV , Section 3 ( b ) of the IMF @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the IMF shall oversee the compliance of each member with its obligations under Section 1 of Article IV .
Section 1 requires each member to “ direct its economic and financial policies toward the objective of fostering orderly economic growth with reasonable price stability ” , and to foster “ orderly underlying economic and financial conditions and a monetary system that does not tend to produce erratic disruptions ” [ i.e.
, our economy is to be planned by the IMF ] .
Article IV , §3 ( b ) of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IMF “ shall exercise firm surveillance over the exchange rate policies of members ” , and “ shall adopt specific principles for the guidance of all members with respect to those policies ” .
USMCA Art .
33.4 confirms that the three Countries are “ bound under the IMF Articles of Agreement to avoid manipulating exchange rates or the international monetary system ” ; but private manipulators ( George Soros ) don ’ t seem to be bound by that restriction .
USMCA Art .
33.6 establishes a Macroeconomic Committee which “ shall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its further elaboration.
” Paragraph 5 of Art .
33.6 empowers the Committee to amend and issue “ interpretations ” of Chapter 33 ; and declares that such interpretations “ shall be deemed to be an interpretation issued pursuant to a decision by consensus of the Commission.
” USMCA Art .
1.4 defines “ Commission ” as “ the Free Trade Commission ” established under USMCA Art .
30.1 .
The purpose of delegating the power to issue Patents and Copyrights to Congress is to “ promote the Progress of Science and useful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries ” .
The Treaty subordinates these property rights to the collective .
USMCA Art .
20.2 states : “ The protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights should contribute to the promotion of technological innovation and to the transfer and dissemination of technology , to the mutual advantage of producers and users of technological knowledge and in a manner conducive to social and economic welfare , and to a balance of rights and obligations.
” Article 20.3 prohibits the Parties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Chapter 20 ; and requires that any measures to protect property rights be “ consistent with the provisions of this Chapter ” .
The Parties are “ to prevent the abuse of intellectual property rights by right holders ” .
Article 20.5 requires each Party to ensure “ that measures to enforce intellectual property rights do not themselves become barriers to legitimate trade ” or “ contravene this Chapter ” .
Article 20.7 requires the Parties to ratify or accede to a long list of international “ agreements ” including the World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) Patent Law Treaty .
The WIPO is an agency of the United Nations .
The 64 pages of Chapter 20 have nothing to do with protection of property rights in Inventors .
Instead , Chapter 20 subordinates ownership of those rights to the collective ; and establishes the framework for global government of patents and copyrights .
10 Art .
IV , §4 requires the United States to protect each of the States against Invasion ; and Art .
I , §8 , cl .
15 authorizes the use of the Militia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control over who enters our Country is an essential element of sovereignty .
But the Treaty subordinates the United States ’ sovereign power over immigration to global and multi-national bodies .
USMCA Art .
16.2 declares : “ 3 .
Nothing in this Agreement prevents a Party from applying measures to regulate the entry of natural persons of another Party into , or their temporary stay in , its territory , including those measures necessary to protect the integrity of , and to ensure the orderly movement of natural persons across , its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not applied in a manner as to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to any Party under this Chapter.
” [ italics added ] “ Except for this Chapter , Chapter 1 ( Initial Provisions and General Definitions ) , Chapter 30 ( Administrative and Institutional Provisions ) , Chapter 31 ( Dispute Settlement ) , Chapter 34 ( Final Provisions ) , Article 29.2 ( Publication ) , and Article 29.3 ( Administrative Proceedings ) , this Agreement does not impose an obligation on a Party regarding its immigration measures.
” [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 23.1 cites the International Labor Organization ’ s ( ILO ) “ Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work ” ( 1998 ) , as guiding the treatment of labor issues under the Treaty .
The ILO is an agency of the United Nations ( UN ) ; and part of the ILO ’ s “ social justice ” agenda is to formulate “ fair migration schemes in regional integration processes ” .
So this is how the UN is to dictate immigration policy for the “ regional integration ” of Canada @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Art .
II , §2 , cl .
2 , grants to the President the power to make Treaties , Chapter 30 of the Treaty establishes the Free Trade Commission .
It is the governing body of the bureaucracy which is created by the Treaty .
Among other powers , the Commission supervises the work of all committees and other subsidiary bodies established under the Treaty ; has the power to merge or dissolve committees and other subsidiary bodies ; and has the power to “ consider ” proposals to amend or modify @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2 .
( c ) lists 6 areas where modifications of the Treaty are subject to completion of “ applicable legal procedures by each Party ” , it does not require that other types of modifications of the Treaty be subject to such approval of the Parties .
And while USMCA Art .
34.3 , 1. provides , “ The Parties may agree , in writing , to amend this Agreement ” , it doesn ’ t say that is the exclusive means of amendment .
Accordingly , we must consider Art @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of amendment .
USMCA Article 30.2 , 2 .
( f ) grants to the Commission power to “ issue interpretations ” of the Treaty ; and the footnote thereto says that its interpretations “ are binding for tribunals and panels established under Chapter 14 ( Investment ) and Chapter 31 ( Dispute Settlement ) .
” And since , as noted above , the “ interpretations ” of Ch .
33 issued by the Macroeconomic Committee are considered as “ interpretations ” issued by the Free Trade Commission , the “ interpretations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be binding on the tribunals deciding disputes between the Parties .
We thus permit the “ creature ” of the Treaty to modify the document under which it holds its existence !
12 Art .
III , §2 , cl .
1 , grants to U.S. Courts the Power to decide all Cases arising under Treaties & all Controversies to which the United States is a Party .
In violation of our Constitution , the Treaty restricts the Parties to the dispute settlement procedures laid out in the Treaty .
Chapter 31 of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violations of the Treaty or “ interpretations ” of the Treaty issued ( or “ deemed to be issued ” ) by the Free Trade Commission .
Disputes are heard by a panel of five drawn from a roster of up to 30 individuals appointed by the Parties .
The panel is to make findings of fact and determinations and issue a report .
If the disputing Parties don ’ t agree on the report , the complaining Party may suspend various benefits held by the responding Party under the Treaty .
Article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a forum for dispute resolution to that set forth in the Treaty or in another international trade agreement to which the disputing Parties are signatories .
Article 31.20 permits a Party to intervene in proceedings already pending in a domestic judicial or administrative forum which involve the interpretation or application of the Treaty .
The purpose of such intervention is to inform the domestic tribunal of the “ interpretations ” of the Treaty issued ( or “ deemed to be issued ” ) by the Free Trade Commission .
Thus , the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ creature ” of the Treaty are to be foisted on our domestic courts and administrative law judges !
Art .
31.21 expressly forbids a Party from making a law which grants a right of action against another Party on the ground that a measure of the other Party is inconsistent with the Treaty .
• Powers reserved by the States or the People which the Treaty transfers to global organizations Our Constitution is one of enumerated powers only .
Most of the powers delegated to the federal government over the Country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I , §8 .
See this Chart .
We did not delegate to our federal government power over labor issues .
However , beginning in the early 1900s , we permitted our federal government to exercise , by usurpation , powers over labor issues.13 As a result , we got the federal Department of Labor , a host of Acts of Congress addressing labor issues , and a plethora of Rules issued by the Department and published in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations .
The Department , its Rules , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as outside the scope of powers delegated .
The Rules are also unconstitutional as in violation of Art .
I , §1 , US Constit .
Chapter 23 of the Treaty transfers those usurped powers to the United Nation ’ s International Labor Organization ( ILO ) .
Article 23.1 defines “ labor laws ” as the statutes and regulations of a Party that are directly related to “ internationally recognized labor rights ” such as the “ right ” to collective bargaining ; and which require Parties to make laws to provide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profit sharing , bonuses , retirement , and healthcare .
Here are some of the dictates set forth in the Treaty with which US laws and agency rules must comply : • At Art .
23.2 , the Parties affirm their obligations stated in the ILO ’ s Declaration on Rights at Work and Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization ( 2008 ) .
• Article 23.3 dictates that “ Each Party shall adopt and maintain in its statutes and regulations , and practices thereunder , ” various rights , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Rights at Work ; and “ Each Party shall adopt and maintain statutes and regulations , and practices thereunder , governing acceptable conditions of work with respect to minimum wages , hours of work , and occupational safety and health.
” • Article 23.5 requires each Party to “ effectively enforce its labor laws ” .
• Article 23.9 requires each Party to implement policies to protect workers against employment discrimination on the basis of sex , pregnancy , sexual orientation , gender identity , and caregiving responsibilities ; and to provide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a child and care of family members ; and to protect against wage discrimination.14 The USMCA Treaty is long and complex : see the Table of Contents .
Here are brief comments on some of the other powers reserved by the States or the People which are unlawfully transferred by the Treaty : • Chapter 19 addresses digital trade .
Article 19.5 requires each Party to maintain a legal framework governing electronic transactions consistent with the principles of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce 1996 .
That model law is a product @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trade Law .
• Chapter 21 addresses competition policy .
Article 21.1 requires each Party to maintain and enforce “ national competition laws ” which proscribe “ anticompetitive business conduct ” .
The Parties are to apply those laws to “ all commercial activities in its territory.
” Article 21.4 requires each Party to adopt or maintain national consumer protection laws or regulations that proscribe fraudulent and deceptive commercial activities .
RELATED : Judge ’ s Doublespeak : It ’ s Unconstitutional , but Lawful , for President to Order Wiretap without Warrant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Article 24.3 requires each Party to ensure that its laws provide for high levels of environmental protection .
Article 24.4 requires each Party to enforce its environmental laws .
Article 24.9 requires each Party to control the production and use of substances which deplete or change the ozone layer [ and on & on for 30 pages ] .
• The Death of the Republican Form of Government In a “ ” , the sovereign power is exercised by representatives elected by the People .
Article IV , §4 , US Constit.
, @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government .
But the USMCA Treaty , time after time , delegates the exercise of sovereign power to various panels , Committees , Commissions , UN organizations , and others – not one of which is elected by the People .
• Don ’ t fall for the carrot dangled in your face !
The Treaty reportedly contains some tariff benefits to various industries in the United States such as the auto and dairy industries .
Their profits ( at least for a while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Treaty .
And for that , We are to surrender our sovereignty to the globalists ?
!
• The 1815 Free Trade Treaty between the United States and Great Britain On Dec. 6 , 1815 , President James Madison sent this treaty to the Senate for ratification .
It is two pages long .
Unlike the USMCA Treaty , it doesn ’ t set up a government over the United States and Great Britain—thus proving that trade treaties need not surrender our sovereignty .
And Madison ’ s treaty doesn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dirty tricks to understand what it does .
In Federalist No .
22 ( last para ) , Alexander Hamilton said that one of the problems with the Articles of Confederation ( AOC ) , our first Constitution , was that it was never ratified by the PEOPLE .
Because the only foundation for the AOC was the consent of state legislatures , questions had arisen concerning its validity .
This is why Art .
VII of our second Constitution ( the one we have now ) provides for its ratification by Conventions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In support of the ratification method set forth in Art .
VII , Hamilton wrote : “ …The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE .
The streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure , original fountain of all legitimate authority.
” [ caps are Hamilton ’ s ] .
This is why our Constitution begins with , “ WE THE PEOPLE ” .
WE consented to it .
But the USMCA Treaty sets up global government over the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is NOT to be submitted to THE PEOPLE for their consent .
The globalists who infest our Legislative and Executive Branches ( the latter of which , as the Perloff article points out , has been dominated by the Council on Foreign Relations for over 70 years ) want the Treaty ratified by a simple majority vote in Congress .
15 The USMCA Treaty is illegitimate ; and the global government it imposes is tyrannical .
America , you are being duped by people who do not have an America First agenda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American sovereignty .
All you ’ re hearing is economy and jobs , but what you aren ’ t hearing about is what it ’ s going to cost you , your children and your country .
Pay attention and call your senators and demand an end to this betrayal of the American people and the US Constitution .
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

While You’re Distracted By Iran, Senate Committee Passed USMCA – Now Set For Full Floor Vote To Give Away American Sovereignty
While Iran is taking center stage in the news, the US Senate Finance Committee voted to advance the trade treaty, not legislation as it’s being touted in the media, known as the US Mexico Canada Agreement by an overwhelming majority to allow for a full vote from the Senate soon.
Fox News reports:
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement moved closer to a final vote in the Senate, with the Senate Finance Committee advancing the legislation Tuesday in a 25-3 vote.
The timing of a vote in the full Senate is uncertain, however. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said a vote will come after an impeachment trial, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not yet sent the two articles of impeachment to the Senate.
Republicans Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, with Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, voted against the updated North American trade deal.
“This modernized trilateral trade agreement will open new markets for American exporters, create hundreds of thousands of new jobs, grow the national economy and protect U.S. workers,” Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said in a statement.
USMCA is expected to create around 176,000 new jobs and inject $34 billion into the U.S. auto industry, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told FOX Business’ Maria Bartiromo last month, citing International Trade Commission data. He added that as many as 589,000 new jobs could be created within five years.
“This new NAFTA delivers long-overdue upgrades to labor standards, the environment and digital trade, while providing certainty to farmers and manufacturers who have been hammered in recent years,” Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said.
It requires 75 percent of automobile components be manufactured in the United States, Canada and Mexico in order to avoid tariffs, and that 40 to 45 percent of automobile parts be made by workers who earn at least $16 an hour by 2023.
But at what cost?
American sovereignty and very specific things outlined in our Constitution. This is something no one in the media is talking about.
If you have not taken a look at what is in the USMCA, constitutional scholar Publius Huldah has outlined exactly how this will begin to set up global government in the Northern Hemisphere.
She writes:
The USMCA Treaty (“Treaty”) was negotiated by U.S. Trade Representative, Robert Lighthizer. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, which works to move the United States into the North American Union (NAU). 1
The Treaty advances the economic and regulatory integration of the three Parties. It is the precursor to the political integration the globalists seek with the NAU. 2
Summary of objections to the Treaty
Our Constitution and Declaration of Independence are the “organic law” of our Land. 3 Treaties, like Acts of Congress, hold a lesser status: they are part of “the supreme Law of the Land” only when they are authorized by “organic law” – our Constitution (Art. VI, cl.2). 4
While the United States is clearly authorized by Art. I, §8, cl.3 & Art. II, §2, cl.2, US Constit., to enter into Treaties with foreign Nations addressing Commerce; 5 the United States may not lawfully transfer to global or multi-national bodies, powers which “WE THE PEOPLE” delegated to our federal government when We ratified our Constitution. But that is what the Treaty purports to do.
Even worse, the Treaty also purports to delegate to global or multi-national bodies powers which We never delegated to our federal government – but reserved to the States or the people.
The Treaty establishes a bureaucratic multi-national government which is to control all aspects of commerce and to which the United States, Mexico and Canada will be subject.
The Treaty incorporates by reference many other documents. Its frequent use of new terminology requires one to constantly refer to the various definition sections spread throughout the 34 Chapters. It engages in the pernicious practice of making a statement, and then qualifying it by phrases such as, “unless otherwise provided in this Agreement” and “unless the Parties decide otherwise”. 6
Powers We delegated to our federal government
When the People of the United States ratified our Constitution, We “created” the federal government. Article I created the Legislative Branch and itemized its powers. Article II created the Executive Branch and itemized its powers. Article III created the Judicial Branch and itemized its powers. Each Branch of the federal government is thus a “creature” of the Constitution and is completely subject to its terms. None of the delegated powers may lawfully be re-delegated to global or multi-national bodies.
The Treaty violates the following provisions of our Constitution:
At Art. I, §1, We vested in Congress, all legislative Powers granted by our Constitution.
At Art. I, §8, We granted to Congress the powers
o Clause 1: To lay and collect Imposts (import tariffs)
o Clause 3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations
o Clause 5: To coin Money and regulate the Value thereof
o Clause 8: To issue Patents and Copyrights
At Art. I, §9, cl. 1: Commencing January 1, 1808, We granted to Congress the power to control Migration (immigration) to the United States.
At Art. II, §2, cl. 2, We granted to the President the power to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.
At Art. III, §2, cl. 1, We declared that the judicial Power of the United States shall extend
o to all Cases arising under Treaties made under the Authority of the United States
o to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party
At Art. IV, §4, We imposed upon the United States the duties to:
o guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government; and
o protect each of the States against Invasion.
At Art. VI, cl. 2, We declared that our Constitution, and Acts of Congress and Treaties authorized by the Constitution, is the “supreme Law of the Land”.
In the 10th Amendment, We declared that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the States or to the people.
Art. I, §8, cl. 1 – to “lay and collect Imposts”
Our Constitution delegates to Congress the power to set the amounts of the tariffs on foreign imports.
The Treaty divests Congress of the power to unilaterally determine our tariffs. USMCA Art. 2.4 7 says:
“1. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, no Party shall increase any existing customs duty, or adopt any new customs duty, on an originating good.
Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, each Party shall apply a customs duty on an originating good in accordance with its Schedule to Annex 2-B (Tariff Commitments)”.
Art. I, §8, cl. 5 – to coin Money and regulate the Value thereof
Our Constitution delegates to Congress the power to control our money.8
But with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, Congress and Woodrow Wilson unlawfully transferred power over our money to an international cabal of privately owned banks – the “Federal Reserve”.
Shortly after WWII, the United States joined the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). 9 James Perloff’s article, Council On Foreign Relations – Influencing American Government, speaks of how the World Bank and IMF act as
“…a loan-guarantee scheme for multinational banks. When a loan to a foreign country goes awry, the World Bank and IMF step in with taxpayer money, ensuring that the private banks continue to receive interest payments. Furthermore, the World Bank and IMF dictate conditions to the countries receiving bailouts, thus giving the bankers a measure of political control over indebted nations.”
The Treaty surrenders the United States’ power over money and our economy to the IMF. USMCA Art. 33.1 defines “Article IV Staff Report” as the report prepared by the IMF respecting a country’s adherence to Art. IV, Section 3 (b) of the IMF Articles of Agreement. Section 3 provides that the IMF shall oversee the compliance of each member with its obligations under Section 1 of Article IV. Section 1 requires each member to “direct its economic and financial policies toward the objective of fostering orderly economic growth with reasonable price stability”, and to foster “orderly underlying economic and financial conditions and a monetary system that does not tend to produce erratic disruptions” [i.e., our economy is to be planned by the IMF].
Article IV, §3 (b) of the IMF Articles of Agreement states that the IMF “shall exercise firm surveillance over the exchange rate policies of members”, and “shall adopt specific principles for the guidance of all members with respect to those policies”. USMCA Art. 33.4 confirms that the three Countries are “bound under the IMF Articles of Agreement to avoid manipulating exchange rates or the international monetary system”; but private manipulators (George Soros) don’t seem to be bound by that restriction.
USMCA Art. 33.6 establishes a Macroeconomic Committee which “shall monitor the implementation of this Chapter and its further elaboration.” Paragraph 5 of Art. 33.6 empowers the Committee to amend and issue “interpretations” of Chapter 33; and declares that such interpretations “shall be deemed to be an interpretation issued pursuant to a decision by consensus of the Commission.” USMCA Art. 1.4 defines “Commission” as “the Free Trade Commission” established under USMCA Art. 30.1.
Art. I, §8, cl. 8 – to issue Patents and Copyrights
The purpose of delegating the power to issue Patents and Copyrights to Congress is to “promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries”.
The Treaty subordinates these property rights to the collective. USMCA Art. 20.2 states:
“The protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights should contribute to the promotion of technological innovation and to the transfer and dissemination of technology, to the mutual advantage of producers and users of technological knowledge and in a manner conducive to social and economic welfare, and to a balance of rights and obligations.”
Article 20.3 prohibits the Parties from making any laws or regulations inconsistent with Chapter 20; and
requires that any measures to protect property rights be “consistent with the provisions of this Chapter”. The Parties are “to prevent the abuse of intellectual property rights by right holders”. Article 20.5 requires each Party to ensure “that measures to enforce intellectual property rights do not themselves become barriers to legitimate trade” or “contravene this Chapter”.
Article 20.7 requires the Parties to ratify or accede to a long list of international “agreements” including the World International Property Organization’s (WIPO) Patent Law Treaty. The WIPO is an agency of the United Nations.
The 64 pages of Chapter 20 have nothing to do with protection of property rights in Inventors. Instead, Chapter 20 subordinates ownership of those rights to the collective; and establishes the framework for global government of patents and copyrights. 10
Art. I, §9, cl.1 grants to Congress power over Migration;
Art. IV, §4 requires the United States to protect each of the States against Invasion;
and Art. I, §8, cl. 15 authorizes the use of the Militia to repel invasions
Our Framers understood that control over who enters our Country is an essential element of sovereignty.
But the Treaty subordinates the United States’ sovereign power over immigration to global and multi-national bodies. USMCA Art. 16.2 declares:
“3. Nothing in this Agreement prevents a Party from applying measures to regulate the entry of natural persons of another Party into, or their temporary stay in, its territory, including those measures necessary to protect the integrity of, and to ensure the orderly movement of natural persons across, its borders, provided that those measures are not applied in a manner as to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to any Party under this Chapter.” [italics added]
Article 16.8 declares:
“Except for this Chapter, Chapter 1 (Initial Provisions and General Definitions), Chapter 30 (Administrative and Institutional Provisions), Chapter 31 (Dispute Settlement), Chapter 34 (Final Provisions), Article 29.2 (Publication), and Article 29.3 (Administrative Proceedings), this Agreement does not impose an obligation on a Party regarding its immigration measures.” [italics added] 11
USMCA Art. 23.1 cites the International Labor Organization’s (ILO) “Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work” (1998), as guiding the treatment of labor issues under the Treaty. The ILO is an agency of the United Nations (UN); and part of the ILO’s “social justice” agenda is to formulate “fair migration schemes in regional integration processes”.
So this is how the UN is to dictate immigration policy for the “regional integration” of Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Art. II, §2, cl. 2, grants to the President the power to make Treaties,
provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur
Chapter 30 of the Treaty establishes the Free Trade Commission. It is the governing body of the bureaucracy which is created by the Treaty. Among other powers, the Commission supervises the work of all committees and other subsidiary bodies established under the Treaty; has the power to merge or dissolve committees and other subsidiary bodies; and has the power to “consider” proposals to amend or modify the Treaty. While Art. 30.2, 2. (c) lists 6 areas where modifications of the Treaty are subject to completion of “applicable legal procedures by each Party”, it does not require that other types of modifications of the Treaty be subject to such approval of the Parties.
And while USMCA Art. 34.3, 1. provides, “The Parties may agree, in writing, to amend this Agreement”, it doesn’t say that is the exclusive means of amendment. Accordingly, we must consider Art. 34.3 as providing an additional means of amendment.
USMCA Article 30.2, 2. (f) grants to the Commission power to “issue interpretations” of the Treaty; and the footnote thereto says that its interpretations “are binding for tribunals and panels established under Chapter 14 (Investment) and Chapter 31 (Dispute Settlement).”
And since, as noted above, the “interpretations” of Ch. 33 issued by the Macroeconomic Committee are considered as “interpretations” issued by the Free Trade Commission, the “interpretations” of the Macroeconomic Committee will also be binding on the tribunals deciding disputes between the Parties.
We thus permit the “creature” of the Treaty to modify the document under which it holds its existence!12
Art. III, §2, cl. 1, grants to U.S. Courts the Power to decide all Cases arising under Treaties &
all Controversies to which the United States is a Party.
In violation of our Constitution, the Treaty restricts the Parties to the dispute settlement procedures laid out in the Treaty.
Chapter 31 of the Treaty addresses resolution of disputes involving violations of the Treaty or “interpretations” of the Treaty issued (or “deemed to be issued”) by the Free Trade Commission. Disputes are heard by a panel of five drawn from a roster of up to 30 individuals appointed by the Parties. The panel is to make findings of fact and determinations and issue a report. If the disputing Parties don’t agree on the report, the complaining Party may suspend various benefits held by the responding Party under the Treaty.
Article 31.3 limits the Parties’ choice of a forum for dispute resolution to that set forth in the Treaty or in another international trade agreement to which the disputing Parties are signatories.
Article 31.20 permits a Party to intervene in proceedings already pending in a domestic judicial or administrative forum which involve the interpretation or application of the Treaty. The purpose of such intervention is to inform the domestic tribunal of the “interpretations” of the Treaty issued (or “deemed to be issued”) by the Free Trade Commission. Thus, the “interpretations” of the Treaty issued by the “creature” of the Treaty are to be foisted on our domestic courts and administrative law judges!
Note that Art. 31.21 expressly forbids a Party from making a law which grants a right of action against another Party on the ground that a measure of the other Party is inconsistent with the Treaty.
Powers reserved by the States or the People which the Treaty transfers to global organizations
Our Constitution is one of enumerated powers only. Most of the powers delegated to the federal government over the Country at large are listed within Art. I, §8. See this Chart.
Labor
We did not delegate to our federal government power over labor issues. However, beginning in the early 1900s, we permitted our federal government to exercise, by usurpation, powers over labor issues.13 As a result, we got the federal Department of Labor, a host of Acts of Congress addressing labor issues, and a plethora of Rules issued by the Department and published in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The Department, its Rules, and the Acts of Congress are unconstitutional as outside the scope of powers delegated. The Rules are also unconstitutional as in violation of Art. I, §1, US Constit.
Chapter 23 of the Treaty transfers those usurped powers to the United Nation’s International Labor Organization (ILO).
Article 23.1 defines “labor laws” as the statutes and regulations of a Party that are directly related to “internationally recognized labor rights” such as the “right” to collective bargaining; and which require Parties to make laws to provide wage-related benefits payments for workers such as profit sharing, bonuses, retirement, and healthcare.
Here are some of the dictates set forth in the Treaty with which US laws and agency rules must comply:
At Art. 23.2, the Parties affirm their obligations stated in the ILO’s Declaration on Rights at Work and Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization (2008).
and (2008). Article 23.3 dictates that “Each Party shall adopt and maintain in its statutes and regulations, and practices thereunder,” various rights, as stated in the ILO’s Declaration on Rights at Work; and “Each Party shall adopt and maintain statutes and regulations, and practices thereunder, governing acceptable conditions of work with respect to minimum wages, hours of work, and occupational safety and health.”
Article 23.5 requires each Party to “effectively enforce its labor laws”.
Article 23.9 requires each Party to implement policies to protect workers against employment discrimination on the basis of sex, pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, and caregiving responsibilities; and to provide job-protected leave for birth or adoption of a child and care of family members; and to protect against wage discrimination.14
Additional Reserved Powers transferred to global or multi-national bodies
The USMCA Treaty is long and complex: see the Table of Contents. Here are brief comments on some of the other powers reserved by the States or the People which are unlawfully transferred by the Treaty:
Chapter 19 addresses digital trade. Article 19.5 requires each Party to maintain a legal framework governing electronic transactions consistent with the principles of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce 1996. That model law is a product of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.
Chapter 21 addresses competition policy. Article 21.1 requires each Party to maintain and enforce “national competition laws” which proscribe “anticompetitive business conduct”. The Parties are to apply those laws to “all commercial activities in its territory.” Article 21.4 requires each Party to adopt or maintain national consumer protection laws or regulations that proscribe fraudulent and deceptive commercial activities.
RELATED: Judge’s Doublespeak: It’s Unconstitutional, but Lawful, for President to Order Wiretap without Warrant
Chapter 24 addresses environmental laws. Article 24.3 requires each Party to ensure that its laws provide for high levels of environmental protection. Article 24.4 requires each Party to enforce its environmental laws. Article 24.9 requires each Party to control the production and use of substances which deplete or change the ozone layer [and on & on for 30 pages].
The Death of the Republican Form of Government
In a “ republic ”, the sovereign power is exercised by representatives elected by the People.
Article IV, §4, US Constit., requires the United States to guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.
But the USMCA Treaty, time after time, delegates the exercise of sovereign power to various panels, Committees, Commissions, UN organizations, and others – not one of which is elected by the People.
Don’t fall for the carrot dangled in your face!
The Treaty reportedly contains some tariff benefits to various industries in the United States such as the auto and dairy industries. Their profits (at least for a while) should increase as a result of the Treaty. And for that, We are to surrender our sovereignty to the globalists?!
The 1815 Free Trade Treaty between the United States and Great Britain
On Dec. 6, 1815, President James Madison sent this treaty to the Senate for ratification. It is two pages long. Unlike the USMCA Treaty, it doesn’t set up a government over the United States and Great Britain—thus proving that trade treaties need not surrender our sovereignty. And Madison’s treaty doesn’t require a lawyer skilled in sniffing out dirty tricks to understand what it does.
Conclusion
In Federalist No. 22 (last para), Alexander Hamilton said that one of the problems with the Articles of Confederation (AOC), our first Constitution, was that it was never ratified by the PEOPLE. Because the only foundation for the AOC was the consent of state legislatures, questions had arisen concerning its validity.
This is why Art. VII of our second Constitution (the one we have now) provides for its ratification by Conventions held in each of the States. In support of the ratification method set forth in Art. VII, Hamilton wrote:
“…The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE. The streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure, original fountain of all legitimate authority.” [caps are Hamilton’s].
This is why our Constitution begins with, “WE THE PEOPLE”. WE consented to it.
But the USMCA Treaty sets up global government over the economic issues covered by the Treaty. It is NOT to be submitted to THE PEOPLE for their consent. The globalists who infest our Legislative and Executive Branches (the latter of which, as the Perloff article points out, has been dominated by the Council on Foreign Relations for over 70 years) want the Treaty ratified by a simple majority vote in Congress. 15
The USMCA Treaty is illegitimate; and the global government it imposes is tyrannical.
America, you are being duped by people who do not have an America First agenda, but are advancing a loss of American sovereignty.
All you’re hearing is economy and jobs, but what you aren’t hearing about is what it’s going to cost you, your children and your country.
Pay attention and call your senators and demand an end to this betrayal of the American people and the US Constitution.
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-09--Treasonous Jihad Rep Ilhan Omar Suggests Iran Attack Trump Hotels

This woman is actually inviting Iranian attacks on US soil .
How is this not treason ?
I guess it isn ’ t technically treason because she is talking hypothetically and not specifically giving advice .
In trying to make a point she seemingly laid out a blueprint for Iran didn ’ t she ?
How are his business interests driving military decisions currently ?
Is she suggesting that he should sell off everything because it could be attacked ?
This is just Omar being Omar — stirring the pot instead of focusing on the task at hand .
Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PJ Media : The inspiringly patriotic Rep. Ilhan Omar ( D-Tehran , no , check that , I ’ m hearing she ’ s from Minnesota ) tweeted Monday offering some unsolicited military advice to the Islamic Republic of Iran : “ Trump needs to immediately divest from his businesses and comply with the emoluments clause .
Iran could threaten Trump hotels *worldwide* and he could provoke war over the loss of revenue from skittish guests .
His business interests should not be driving military decisions.
” She also tweeted a video in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the U.S. is “ not very good at anything ” besides war .
And so once again we have to ask the by-now-familiar question : Is Ilhan Omar a traitor who hates America ?
Omar ’ s warning that Trump ’ s “ business interests should not be driving military decisions ” makes no sense , because clearly the fact that Trump owns hotels that Iran could target didn ’ t stop him from going after Qasem Soleimani .
But as far as Omar and her ideological allies are concerned , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to twist their logic into pretzels to get Trump , as long as they make the president look bad .
That imperative has now driven Omar even to give a military suggestion to a hostile foreign power .
The mullahs and their henchmen haven ’ t said anything about targeting Trump hotels , so here is a United States congresswoman to give them a marvelous new idea about how they could murder Americans and others , and further menace the United States .
The definition of treason is giving aid and comfort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Islamic Republic of Iran order their people to chant “ Death to America ” in mosques every Friday , and repeatedly vow that they will ultimately destroy the United States of America and the state of Israel .
They were doing this before Soleimani was killed , and they ’ re doing it now .
How is giving them a suggestion about how they could target the United States , whether or not they have or would have thought of it themselves , not giving aid and comfort to the enemy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the oath of office to become a member of the United States House of Representatives , she swore to “ support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies , foreign and domestic , ” as well as to “ bear true faith and allegiance to the same.
” Inviting , out of a hysterical hostility to the president of the United States , a nation that regularly chants “ Death to America ” to strike American-owned businesses – is that supporting and defending the nation against foreign enemies ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that she suggested no attack on the Constitution , which is what she specifically swore to defend , but clearly the oath uses “ Constitution ” as a metonymy for the nation as a whole .
Abetting this impression is the fact that Omar on the same day demonstrated her hostility to the country that she has sworn to protect and defend .
She tweeted the Carlin video with the comment : “ It ’ s no laughing matter , ” just so we ’ re clear that she didn ’ t mean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the claim that the country to which she has sworn allegiance and which she represents in its Legislative Branch is just a war-mongering blunderer that is not good at anything besides being militarily aggressive .
Meanwhile , she invites the military aggression of one of America ’ s foremost enemies .
If the Islamic Republic of Iran turns out to be not good at much of anything besides war against the United States , would Ilhan Omar have any problem with that ?
Despite all this and more , it is , of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will ever be brought against Ilhan Omar .
Her hatred of America plays well among the American Leftists who share it , and the Democratic Party establishment would condemn any such charges as a partisan attack and the attacker as a racist right-wing white supremacist and enemy of all that is good .
Meanwhile , the past week has given us abundant examples of how the Democrats hate Trump with such burning intensity that they are willing to lionize and mourn a man who was responsible for the deaths of at least 600 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ great deal more terrorist activity .
So what ’ s a little treason among America-hating friends ?
This woman needs to be deported NOW .
She ’ ll soon be giving jihadis , that are already here , a list of targets to attack .
• ‘ Death To America ’ : Iran Is Poised To Unleash Hordes Of Hezbollah Terrorists On U.S .
Soil • Build the Damn Wall — 157 Terrorists Who Were Caught Trying to Enter America Illegally • We Have Entered A Time When Islamic Terrorists Will Be Specifically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Iran Has Hezbollah Sleeper Cells in America Ready To Strike Ilhan Omar is a sharia loving ____ ( starts with a “ B ” ) who does nothing but undercut everything that has ever made America great .
• Ilhan Omar Conveniently Gets Donation From Pro-Turkish Group Right Before Voting Against Sanctions on Turkey • What ?
?
?
Ilhan Omar Calls for Biological Warfare Against American Citizens & ICE Agents • Video : Trump Exposes The Real Ilhan Omar as a ‘ Virulent Anti-Semitic , ’ ‘ America Hater ’ Who Married @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needs to start focusing on America First and let the jihadis plan their own attacks .
There is a reason she is in America and not working with the terrorists she loves and admires .
She should be beheaded for trying to give the Muslim men advice .
That is not her place .
In Islam , women are for raping and bearing children and NOT for giving advice to governments and their militaries .
Maybe Iran should send a terrorist to Ilhan Omar ’ s house .
It ’ s best they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us how to beat them .
Oh wait , that will never happen… And no one in America would listen anyway…

This woman is actually inviting Iranian attacks on US soil.
How is this not treason?
Trump needs to immediately divest from his businesses and comply with the emoluments clause. Iran could threaten Trump hotels *worldwide* and he could provoke war over the loss of revenue from skittish guests. His business interests should not be driving military decisions. — Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) January 6, 2020
I guess it isn’t technically treason because she is talking hypothetically and not specifically giving advice.
Still…
Shut your mouth congresswoman Omar!
In trying to make a point she seemingly laid out a blueprint for Iran didn’t she?
How are his business interests driving military decisions currently?
Is she suggesting that he should sell off everything because it could be attacked?
This is just Omar being Omar — stirring the pot instead of focusing on the task at hand.
What a nut job.
Here’s more from Robert Spencer via PJ Media:
The inspiringly patriotic Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Tehran, no, check that, I’m hearing she’s from Minnesota) tweeted Monday offering some unsolicited military advice to the Islamic Republic of Iran: “Trump needs to immediately divest from his businesses and comply with the emoluments clause. Iran could threaten Trump hotels *worldwide* and he could provoke war over the loss of revenue from skittish guests. His business interests should not be driving military decisions.” She also tweeted a video in which the late comedian George Carlin asserts that the U.S. is “not very good at anything” besides war. And so once again we have to ask the by-now-familiar question: Is Ilhan Omar a traitor who hates America?
Omar’s warning that Trump’s “business interests should not be driving military decisions” makes no sense, because clearly the fact that Trump owns hotels that Iran could target didn’t stop him from going after Qasem Soleimani. But as far as Omar and her ideological allies are concerned, it doesn’t matter how much they have to twist their logic into pretzels to get Trump, as long as they make the president look bad. That imperative has now driven Omar even to give a military suggestion to a hostile foreign power. The mullahs and their henchmen haven’t said anything about targeting Trump hotels, so here is a United States congresswoman to give them a marvelous new idea about how they could murder Americans and others, and further menace the United States.
The definition of treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. The leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran order their people to chant “Death to America” in mosques every Friday, and repeatedly vow that they will ultimately destroy the United States of America and the state of Israel. They were doing this before Soleimani was killed, and they’re doing it now. How is giving them a suggestion about how they could target the United States, whether or not they have or would have thought of it themselves, not giving aid and comfort to the enemy, and hence treason?
When she took the oath of office to become a member of the United States House of Representatives, she swore to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” as well as to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.” Inviting, out of a hysterical hostility to the president of the United States, a nation that regularly chants “Death to America” to strike American-owned businesses – is that supporting and defending the nation against foreign enemies? Omar might well split hairs and assert that she suggested no attack on the Constitution, which is what she specifically swore to defend, but clearly the oath uses “Constitution” as a metonymy for the nation as a whole.
Abetting this impression is the fact that Omar on the same day demonstrated her hostility to the country that she has sworn to protect and defend. She tweeted the Carlin video with the comment: “It’s no laughing matter,” just so we’re clear that she didn’t mean any joke. She is seriously offering the claim that the country to which she has sworn allegiance and which she represents in its Legislative Branch is just a war-mongering blunderer that is not good at anything besides being militarily aggressive. Meanwhile, she invites the military aggression of one of America’s foremost enemies. If the Islamic Republic of Iran turns out to be not good at much of anything besides war against the United States, would Ilhan Omar have any problem with that?
Despite all this and more, it is, of course, inconceivable that any treason charges will ever be brought against Ilhan Omar. Her hatred of America plays well among the American Leftists who share it, and the Democratic Party establishment would condemn any such charges as a partisan attack and the attacker as a racist right-wing white supremacist and enemy of all that is good. Meanwhile, the past week has given us abundant examples of how the Democrats hate Trump with such burning intensity that they are willing to lionize and mourn a man who was responsible for the deaths of at least 600 Americans, as well as for a great deal more terrorist activity. So what’s a little treason among America-hating friends?
#####
This woman needs to be deported NOW.
She’ll soon be giving jihadis, that are already here, a list of targets to attack.
Ilhan Omar is a sharia loving ____ (starts with a “B”) who does nothing but undercut everything that has ever made America great.
This congresswoman needs to start focusing on America First and let the jihadis plan their own attacks.
There is a reason she is in America and not working with the terrorists she loves and admires.
She should be beheaded for trying to give the Muslim men advice.
That is not her place.
In Islam, women are for raping and bearing children and NOT for giving advice to governments and their militaries.
Silly Omar, America has changed you.
Maybe Iran should send a terrorist to Ilhan Omar’s house.
It’s best they shut her up before she starts telling us how to beat them.
Oh wait, that will never happen…
And no one in America would listen anyway…
h/t PJ Media
Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison


thewashingtonstandard--2020-01-09--Iranian-American Woman Sets Record Straight About Soleimani, American Media Ignores Her

First , let me post the video of what this Iranian-American said , and then I have a surprise for you .
This is a very relevant story that should be on every news site in the country .
I will admit I was in a hurry and there may be more , but guess what the first site was that I found to even cover this story ?
An Iranian American activist said she is completely outraged at the “ propaganda machine ” glorifying the Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani , killed by an American airstrike in Iraq @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Iranian activist , said in a Facebook video Tuesday Iranians are happy now that Soleimani is dead , contrary to what many mourning videos that came out of Iran depicted .
“ The people in Iran are happy that this man who is responsible for the slaughter of so many people is gone , ” she said in the viral video .
“ This man has not only the blood of Americans on his hand but the blood of Iranians , Iraqis , Yemenis , Afghans…since when did we start mourning the death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the videos that came out of Soleimani ’ s funeral saying they are all “ propaganda ” and what ’ s happening in the videos is nothing new .
“ The regime has been saying ‘ death to America ’ for 40 years , ” said Kasraie .
“ They forced us in school to say , ‘ death to America ’ .
I was 7 years old , I didn ’ t know what I was saying.
” The people saying that now are getting paid to say it and to kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kasraie .
That ’ s not “ the people , ” she added .
“ The majority of the people in the Middle East don ’ t hate America , they don ’ t hate Donald Trump.
” She said many Iranians were celebrating Soleimani ’ s death by giving out cakes and cookies in the streets in Iran .
Kasraie ended the video by thanking US President Donald Trump .
“ Thank you , Mr. Trump , for making a very hard decision and for having the moral courage to do something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never have had.
” While your FAKE alphabet news covers every anti-Trump angle imaginable , it takes a news site from the Middle East to report the news that you should be hearing .
What is wrong with this picture ?
• Fake News Alert : NYTimes writer literally makes up a quote Trump ’ s decision to target Soleimani • FAKE NEWS Cluster $ & @ !
: Major FAKE News Outlets Publish “ Breaking ” False Story About 100,000 Migrant Kids in Detention- Immediately Delete it After Realizing it Happened Under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Corruption as ABC was Covering it Up—Who ’ s the Real Fake News ?
• Another FAKE NEWS Poll from FOX Shows ALL Top Dems & Even Hillary Lead Donald Trump • FAKE NEWS Alert : ABC News Uses 2017 Footage from a Kentucky Military Show to Depict Current Fighting in Syria I didn ’ t check thoroughly , this time , because I was in a hurry .
But when al Arabiya is the first outlet I found that covered this woman ’ s opinions , there is definitely something wrong with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be summed up with two words… I bet you thought I was going to say “ Fake News ” didn ’ t you ?
Well , OK , maybe it ’ s four words .

First, let me post the video of what this Iranian-American said, and then I have a surprise for you.
My friend Erica is a longtime Iranian activist. A video she made about Soleimani and what's happening inside Iran is going viral on FB. Watch: pic.twitter.com/W3TNUr6164 — David Reaboi (@davereaboi) January 7, 2020
This is a very relevant story that should be on every news site in the country.
I will admit I was in a hurry and there may be more, but guess what the first site was that I found to even cover this story?
Here’s more from al Arabiya:
An Iranian American activist said she is completely outraged at the “propaganda machine” glorifying the Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, killed by an American airstrike in Iraq.
Saghar Erica Kasraie, a longtime Iranian activist, said in a Facebook video Tuesday Iranians are happy now that Soleimani is dead, contrary to what many mourning videos that came out of Iran depicted.
“The people in Iran are happy that this man who is responsible for the slaughter of so many people is gone,” she said in the viral video. “This man has not only the blood of Americans on his hand but the blood of Iranians, Iraqis, Yemenis, Afghans…since when did we start mourning the death of a terrorist?”
Kasraie criticized the videos that came out of Soleimani’s funeral saying they are all “propaganda” and what’s happening in the videos is nothing new.
“The regime has been saying ‘death to America’ for 40 years,” said Kasraie. “They forced us in school to say, ‘death to America’. I was 7 years old, I didn’t know what I was saying.”
The people saying that now are getting paid to say it and to kill people on the street, according to Kasraie.
That’s not “the people,” she added. “The majority of the people in the Middle East don’t hate America, they don’t hate Donald Trump.”
She said many Iranians were celebrating Soleimani’s death by giving out cakes and cookies in the streets in Iran.
Kasraie ended the video by thanking US President Donald Trump.
“Thank you, Mr. Trump, for making a very hard decision and for having the moral courage to do something that a lot of world leaders would never have had.”
More…
#####
That’s right America.
While your FAKE alphabet news covers every anti-Trump angle imaginable, it takes a news site from the Middle East to report the news that you should be hearing.
What is wrong with this picture?
Fake News in America
I didn’t check thoroughly, this time, because I was in a hurry.
But when al Arabiya is the first outlet I found that covered this woman’s opinions, there is definitely something wrong with American Media.
American Media in 2020 can be summed up with two words…
GET TRUMP!
I bet you thought I was going to say “Fake News” didn’t you?
Well, OK, maybe it’s four words.
Article posted with permission from Dean Garrison