thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-23--In Clear Violation Of The US Constitution, If The COVID Vaccine Injures You, You Can’t Sue Anyone, P

In Clear Violation Of The US Constitution , If The COVID Vaccine Injures You , You Can ’ t Sue Anyone , Probably Not Even The Government Pushing It As TFTP reported this week , in a historical move , marking the fastest ever approved vaccine in history , it took the US government less time to approve a COVID-19 vaccine than it did for them to approve $ 600 checks for starving Americans .
Naturally , this has fueled public mistrust as by the very definition of “ long-term ” studies , absolutely no long-term studies were conducted in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this mistrust is the fact that if you are harmed by the COVID-19 vaccine , Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability and you will have no one to blame in a U.S. court of law .
Thanks to government “ magic ” you will be out of luck if the COVID-19 vaccine injures you .
In 2007 , the US taxpayers were told that they were responsible for the negligent actions of several large banking institutions .
They were told that in order to prevent “ complete and utter chaos ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the banking cartels hundreds of billions of dollars to “ bail them out.
” Despite an overwhelming majority of the public opposing this action , it was passed with bipartisan support in a matter of hours .
The public was furious after being told that they are being personally held liable for the irresponsible acts of megabanks — and there was nothing that they could do about it .
As so-called conservatives blast the welfare system for the negative incentives created by these programs , they remain conveniently silent when it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end of that welfare .
From banking to farming to health care — megacorporations suckle from the teat of government at the taxpayers expense and the politicians in D.C. facilitate all of it .
The problem with government subsidies for irresponsible acts by businesses is that it encourages careless behavior .
One particular corporate welfare program has cost the U.S. taxpayers over four billion since its inception in 1988 .
Knowing the undesirable effects of such “ safety nets ” provided through extortion of the populace to large corporations , one should avoid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in relation to the medical industry .
Imagine , if you will , the disturbing scenario that would be possible if doctors were not held responsible for malpractice .
The very threat of litigation for one ’ s negligence creates the incentive to act responsibly .
However , a certain sect of the medical industry gets a pass — just like the banking cartels are deemed “ too big to fail ” so are the vaccine manufacturers .
In 1988 , largely due to vaccine makers lobbying the government to alleviate their liability @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( NVICP ) was established .
After an uptick in lawsuits in the late 80 ’ s , the vaccine manufacturers essentially held the government hostage and threatened to stop making vaccines unless the government took on responsibility for vaccine injury lawsuits — and NVICP did just that .
You can actually prove that you or your child were harmed from a vaccine yet the vaccine maker is completely shielded from liability .
Even if you are awarded monetary compensation through the NVICP , the taxpayers are put on the line , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ liability has created the incentive to turn out new vaccines with very little testing , as the companies don ’ t have to worry about financial hardships for injuring people , which in turn has shaped the situation that we find ourselves in today .
In the last 2 decades , we ’ ve witnessed a near 300 % increase in the number of CDC recommended vaccines .
Now , we have companies like Pfizer turning out a vaccine that was developed and approved in only eight months and they had absolutely zero @ @ @ @ @ @ @ depth study of its safety .
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System ( VAERS ) receives around 30,000 reports annually , with 13 % classified as serious ( e.g.
, associated with disability , hospitalization , life-threatening illness or death ) according to the CDC VAERS Master Search Tool .
Since its first year in action , NVICP has paid out $ 4,132,942,676.47 with and additional $ 230,556,766.53 going to attorney ’ s fees , according to the latest report by the Health Resources and Service Administration .
The last six years alone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ payouts , indicating a sharp increase in the amount of petitioner ’ s awards .
Since 1988 , over 22,685 petitions have been filed with the VICP .
Over that 32 year time period , 19,403 petitions have been adjudicated , with 7,705 of those determined to be compensable , while 11,698 were dismissed .
Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $ 4.4 billion , according to HRSA .
While vaccine injuries are particularly rare , the fact remains that they happen .
Also , according to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Practices ( ACIP ) , the number of adverse reactions is underreported .
Nevertheless , those injured by a vaccine could at least seek some compensation , albeit from the taxpayers .
But all that has changed in 2020 with the advent of the COVID-19 vaccine .
If you are injured by it , you don ’ t get to use the NVICP because no COVID-19 vaccine is on their list of “ covered vaccines.
” Instead as CNBC reports , in February , Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PREP ) .
The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies , such as vaccines and treatments , unless there ’ s “ willful misconduct ” by the company .
The protection lasts until 2024 .
That means that for the next four years , these companies “ can not be sued for money damages in court ” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid .
“ When the government said , ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or five times faster than you normally do , ’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government , ‘ We want you , the government , to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits , ’ ” said Rogge Dunn , a Dallas labor and employment attorney .
And that ’ s exactly what the government did .
So , in instances of harm from the COVID-19 vaccine , no one is held liable because it ’ s the FDA who approved the vaccine and you can ’ t sue them .
“ You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approving or disapproving a drug , ” said Dorit Reiss , a professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law .
“ That ’ s part of its sovereign immunity.
” There are limited exceptions , but Dunn said he doesn ’ t think they provide a viable legal path to hold the federal government responsible for a Covid vaccine injury .
Those limited exceptions are for people who experience extreme adverse reactions .
Within the PREP Act , government established the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program ( CICP ) , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious injury from the uncovered vaccines .
However , the coverages are weak .
If you are injured so badly from the vaccine that you can ’ t even leave your home , the maximum amount of money you will get it $ 50,000 per year as long as you are injured .
Even if you literally drop dead after getting the shot , the program ’ s death payout is capped at $ 370,376 .
“ This government compensation program is very hard to use , ” said Reiss .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Indeed , it is extremely high .
Of the 499 claims filed , the CICP has compensated only 29 claims , totaling more than $ 6 million .
The overt problem with the way this is unfolding is that removing anyone or any company ’ s liability for their negligence has significant impacts on the way they will make decisions .
Just like taxpayers are held responsible for police misconduct and nothing changes , when vaccine makers pass the buck to the taxpayer — again , nothing changes .
In fact , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not having widespread vaccine measures in place .
According to the CDC , as of Dec. 18 , 3,150 people reported what the CDC terms “ Health Impact Events ” after getting vaccinated .
If a corporation does not have to assess the risks associated with negligence , then that corporation will be incentivized to ultimately foster carelessness — this cause and effect of negative incentive is basic economics .
The only way a Pfizer or Moderna can be held liable is if willful misconduct can be shown to have caused injury , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ caught knowingly causing harm .
If we look at the economic properties at work with such a program , what this does is provides negative incentive to test a vaccine for safety , because if they are aware of problems before the vaccine is launched , then they could potentially be held liable for knowingly causing harm .
Now , we find ourselves in a situation in which many within the government want to force Americans to take the shot to receive a vaccine that has not undergone long term testing , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or kills you .
This is 2020 in the land of the free .

In Clear Violation Of The US Constitution, If The COVID Vaccine Injures You, You Can’t Sue Anyone, Probably Not Even The Government Pushing It
As TFTP reported this week, in a historical move, marking the fastest ever approved vaccine in history, it took the US government less time to approve a COVID-19 vaccine than it did for them to approve $600 checks for starving Americans. Naturally, this has fueled public mistrust as by the very definition of “long-term” studies, absolutely no long-term studies were conducted in regard to the vaccine. Adding to this mistrust is the fact that if you are harmed by the COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer and Moderna have total immunity from liability and you will have no one to blame in a U.S. court of law. Thanks to government “magic” you will be out of luck if the COVID-19 vaccine injures you.
In 2007, the US taxpayers were told that they were responsible for the negligent actions of several large banking institutions. They were told that in order to prevent “complete and utter chaos” from a banking collapse they must give the banking cartels hundreds of billions of dollars to “bail them out.” Despite an overwhelming majority of the public opposing this action, it was passed with bipartisan support in a matter of hours.
The public was furious after being told that they are being personally held liable for the irresponsible acts of megabanks — and there was nothing that they could do about it.
As so-called conservatives blast the welfare system for the negative incentives created by these programs, they remain conveniently silent when it’s huge and corrupt corporations on the receiving end of that welfare. From banking to farming to health care — megacorporations suckle from the teat of government at the taxpayers expense and the politicians in D.C. facilitate all of it.
The problem with government subsidies for irresponsible acts by businesses is that it encourages careless behavior. One particular corporate welfare program has cost the U.S. taxpayers over four billion since its inception in 1988.
Knowing the undesirable effects of such “safety nets” provided through extortion of the populace to large corporations, one should avoid such scenarios. This is especially true in relation to the medical industry. Imagine, if you will, the disturbing scenario that would be possible if doctors were not held responsible for malpractice. The very threat of litigation for one’s negligence creates the incentive to act responsibly.
However, a certain sect of the medical industry gets a pass — just like the banking cartels are deemed “too big to fail” so are the vaccine manufacturers. In 1988, largely due to vaccine makers lobbying the government to alleviate their liability, The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) was established.
After an uptick in lawsuits in the late 80’s, the vaccine manufacturers essentially held the government hostage and threatened to stop making vaccines unless the government took on responsibility for vaccine injury lawsuits — and NVICP did just that.
You can actually prove that you or your child were harmed from a vaccine yet the vaccine maker is completely shielded from liability. Even if you are awarded monetary compensation through the NVICP, the taxpayers are put on the line, not the vaccine makers. This removal of liability has created the incentive to turn out new vaccines with very little testing, as the companies don’t have to worry about financial hardships for injuring people, which in turn has shaped the situation that we find ourselves in today. In the last 2 decades, we’ve witnessed a near 300% increase in the number of CDC recommended vaccines.
Now, we have companies like Pfizer turning out a vaccine that was developed and approved in only eight months and they had absolutely zero incentive to devote resources to the in depth study of its safety.
The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) receives around 30,000 reports annually, with 13% classified as serious (e.g., associated with disability, hospitalization, life-threatening illness or death) according to the CDC VAERS Master Search Tool.
Since its first year in action, NVICP has paid out $4,132,942,676.47 with and additional $230,556,766.53 going to attorney’s fees, according to the latest report by the Health Resources and Service Administration. The last six years alone are responsible for 30 percent of all payouts, indicating a sharp increase in the amount of petitioner’s awards.
Since 1988, over 22,685 petitions have been filed with the VICP. Over that 32 year time period, 19,403 petitions have been adjudicated, with 7,705 of those determined to be compensable, while 11,698 were dismissed. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $4.4 billion, according to HRSA.
While vaccine injuries are particularly rare, the fact remains that they happen. Also, according to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the number of adverse reactions is underreported.
“VAERS data are limited by underreporting and unknown sensitivity of the reporting system, making it difficult to compare adverse event rates following vaccination reported to VAERS with those from complications following natural disease.”
Nevertheless, those injured by a vaccine could at least seek some compensation, albeit from the taxpayers. But all that has changed in 2020 with the advent of the COVID-19 vaccine. If you are injured by it, you don’t get to use the NVICP because no COVID-19 vaccine is on their list of “covered vaccines.”
Instead as CNBC reports, in February, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP). The 2005 law empowers the HHS secretary to provide legal protection to companies making or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines and treatments, unless there’s “willful misconduct” by the company. The protection lasts until 2024.
That means that for the next four years, these companies “cannot be sued for money damages in court” over injuries related to the administration or use of products to treat or protect against Covid.
“When the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney.
And that’s exactly what the government did. So, in instances of harm from the COVID-19 vaccine, no one is held liable because it’s the FDA who approved the vaccine and you can’t sue them.
“You can’t sue the FDA for approving or disapproving a drug,” said Dorit Reiss, a professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law. “That’s part of its sovereign immunity.”
There are limited exceptions, but Dunn said he doesn’t think they provide a viable legal path to hold the federal government responsible for a Covid vaccine injury.
Those limited exceptions are for people who experience extreme adverse reactions.
Within the PREP Act, government established the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which provides benefits to eligible individuals who suffer serious injury from the uncovered vaccines. However, the coverages are weak. If you are injured so badly from the vaccine that you can’t even leave your home, the maximum amount of money you will get it $50,000 per year as long as you are injured.
Even if you literally drop dead after getting the shot, the program’s death payout is capped at $370,376.
“This government compensation program is very hard to use,” said Reiss. “The bar for compensation is very high.”
Indeed, it is extremely high. Of the 499 claims filed, the CICP has compensated only 29 claims, totaling more than $6 million.
The overt problem with the way this is unfolding is that removing anyone or any company’s liability for their negligence has significant impacts on the way they will make decisions. Just like taxpayers are held responsible for police misconduct and nothing changes, when vaccine makers pass the buck to the taxpayer — again, nothing changes.
In fact, we are already seeing adverse reactions, despite not having widespread vaccine measures in place.
According to the CDC, as of Dec. 18, 3,150 people reported what the CDC terms “Health Impact Events” after getting vaccinated.
The definition of a Health Impact Event is: “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.”
If a corporation does not have to assess the risks associated with negligence, then that corporation will be incentivized to ultimately foster carelessness — this cause and effect of negative incentive is basic economics.
The only way a Pfizer or Moderna can be held liable is if willful misconduct can be shown to have caused injury, meaning vaccine makers have to actually be caught knowingly causing harm.
If we look at the economic properties at work with such a program, what this does is provides negative incentive to test a vaccine for safety, because if they are aware of problems before the vaccine is launched, then they could potentially be held liable for knowingly causing harm.
Now, we find ourselves in a situation in which many within the government want to force Americans to take the shot to receive a vaccine that has not undergone long term testing, with absolutely no recourse if that vaccine hurts or kills you. This is 2020 in the land of the free.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-23--During COVID: Is Churchgoing ‘High Risk, Low Reward’?

Some leftist government officials , in the name of trying to fight the spread of COVID-19 , have come down hard on churches .
For example , California Gov .
Gavin Newsom declared ( May 7 ) , “ We ’ re looking at the science , epidemiology , looking again at frequency , duration , time , and looking at low risk-high reward , high risk-low reward.
” [ Emphasis added . ]
He has defined abortion clinics as essential , but churches were categorized as non-essential .
Christian legal groups have had to fight with the governor to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which the U.S. Constitution guarantees .
Newsom was not alone in his attempt to hamstring the churches .
Virginia Gov .
Ralph Northam mandated that only 10 people could attend church .
But not to worry , said the theologian-in-chief of the Old Dominion state : “ For me , God is wherever you are .
You don ’ t have to sit in the church pew for God to hear your prayers.
” In November , Kentucky Gov .
Andy Beshear ordered a halt of in-person worship services – even after having @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s restraining order earlier this year for doing the same .
All of this leads to an interesting question : What , if anything , do churches contribute to society ?
Are churches just “ high risk , low reward ” ?
I spoke recently on the radio with Dr. Byron Johnson , director of the Institute for Studies of Religion at Baylor .

Some leftist government officials, in the name of trying to fight the spread of COVID-19, have come down hard on churches.
For example, California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared (May 7), “We’re looking at the science, epidemiology, looking again at frequency, duration, time, and looking at low risk-high reward, high risk-low reward.” [Emphasis added.]
He has defined abortion clinics as essential, but churches were categorized as non-essential. Christian legal groups have had to fight with the governor to be able to practice religious freedom, which the U.S. Constitution guarantees.
Newsom was not alone in his attempt to hamstring the churches. Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam mandated that only 10 people could attend church. But not to worry, said the theologian-in-chief of the Old Dominion state: “For me, God is wherever you are. You don’t have to sit in the church pew for God to hear your prayers.”
In November, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear ordered a halt of in-person worship services – even after having been hit with a federal judge’s restraining order earlier this year for doing the same.
All of this leads to an interesting question: What, if anything, do churches contribute to society? Are churches just “high risk, low reward”?
I spoke recently on the radio with Dr. Byron Johnson, director of the Institute for Studies of Religion at Baylor.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-24--President Trump Vetoes Defense Spending Bill

President Trump vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 Wednesday , calling it a “ gift ” to U.S. adversaries China and Russia , making good on a promise to veto it if it did not repeal a law that shields certain Big Tech companies from liabilities .
There is too much wrong with the bill .
“ I am returning , without my approval , H.R .
6395 … My Administration recognizes the importance of the Act to our national security .
Unfortunately , the Act fails to include critical national security measures , includes provisions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our military ’ s history , and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions .
It is a ‘ gift ’ to China and Russia , ” the president wrote .
The president denounced the legislation for not including language that would strip social media companies from the protections they enjoy under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act .
The measure , adopted in 1996 , prevents companies such as Twitter and Facebook from being sued by anyone claiming to be harmed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims social media companies are biased against conservatives , has said Section 230 is a threat to national security .

President Trump vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 Wednesday, calling it a “gift” to U.S. adversaries China and Russia, making good on a promise to veto it if it did not repeal a law that shields certain Big Tech companies from liabilities.
There is too much wrong with the bill.
https://twitter.com/AFCyberGator/status/1341535290377252866?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1341535290377252866%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgellerreport.com%2F2020%2F12%2Fpresident-trump-vetoes-defense-spending-bill-it-is-a-gift-to-china-and-russia.html%2F
https://twitter.com/AFCyberGator/status/1341535290377252866?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1341535290377252866%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgellerreport.com%2F2020%2F12%2Fpresident-trump-vetoes-defense-spending-bill-it-is-a-gift-to-china-and-russia.html%2F
“I am returning, without my approval, H.R. 6395 … My Administration recognizes the importance of the Act to our national security. Unfortunately, the Act fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military’s history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions. It is a ‘gift’ to China and Russia,” the president wrote.
I will Veto the Defense Bill, which will make China very unhappy. They love it. Must have Section 230 termination, protect our National Monuments and allow for removal of military from far away, and very unappreciative, lands. Thank you! https://t.co/9rI08S5ofO — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 17, 2020
The president denounced the legislation for not including language that would strip social media companies from the protections they enjoy under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The measure, adopted in 1996, prevents companies such as Twitter and Facebook from being sued by anyone claiming to be harmed by a post. Trump, who claims social media companies are biased against conservatives, has said Section 230 is a threat to national security.
Trump Defense Bill Veto It is a "gift" to China and Russia. Failure to terminate the very dangerous national security risk of Section 230 Act includes language that would require the renaming of certain military installations. Contradict my policy to bring our troops home. — Charles V Payne (@cvpayne) December 23, 2020
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-24--More Mind Controlling Propaganda From The Same Propagandists That Brought You The First Act:  “Scary

More Mind Controlling Propaganda From The Same Propagandists That Brought You The First Act : “ Scary ” Mutant COVID In South Africa More Dangerous Than “ Super COVID ” In UK A new mutant strain of COVID-19 that has been dubbed “ 501.V2 ” has gotten completely out of control in South Africa , and authorities are telling us that it is an even bigger threat than the “ Super COVID ” that has been causing so much panic in the United Kingdom .
Of course , viruses mutate all the time , and so it isn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But mutations can become a major issue when they fundamentally alter the way that a virus affects humans , and we are being told that “ 501.V2 ” is much more transmissible than previous versions of COVID and that even young people are catching it a lot more easily .
That is potentially a huge concern because up until now young people have not been hit very hard by the COVID pandemic .
The British press is using the word “ scary ” to describe this new variant , and at this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dominant strain in South Africa… If this same pattern happens elsewhere as this new mutant strain travels around the globe , then “ 501.V2 ” could eventually almost entirely replace all of the older versions of COVID .
Authorities are optimistically telling us that the recent vaccines that have been developed will “ likely ” work against this new variant , but the truth is that they will not know until testing is done .
And if the vaccines don ’ t work against “ 501.V2 ” , we could be back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , countries all over the globe are banning flights from South Africa in a desperate attempt to isolate this new version .
The UK , Germany , Switzerland , Turkey and Israel are among the nations that have banned those flights , but so far the United States is not on that list .
So people that are potentially carrying this new version of COVID continue to enter the U.S. on a daily basis .
For the United Kingdom , this flight ban may have come too late because two cases of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ British soil… If the new vaccines are effective against “ 501.V2 ” , authorities believe that they already have the long-term answer to this new variant .
But if those vaccines don ’ t work , this pandemic could be entering a far more deadly new phase .
And of course , we are hearing about more problems with these new vaccines on a daily basis .
Thousands of adverse reactions have already been reported to the CDC , and more reports continue to pour in as more people get the shots .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ City… We should not be surprised that there are major issues with experimental mRNA vaccines that are based on entirely new technology that were rushed into production without proper testing .
And of course , there are tens of millions of Americans that will never take any mRNA vaccine that literally “ hijacks your cells ” under any circumstances .
On the other hand , most of the U.S. population seems to think that these new vaccines will bring this pandemic to an end , but if they don ’ t work against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ won ’ t be true at all .
It is so important to take a balanced view of these things .
Unfortunately , when it comes to COVID most people fall into two camps .
The first camp is totally freaked out because they think that COVID is about the worst thing that could ever happen to the United States and they tend to favor extremely draconian measures to prevent the spread of the virus .
But the truth is that the COVID pandemic pales in comparison to other great pandemics throughout human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Spanish Flu Pandemic each killed at least 50 million people .
As for the COVID pandemic , the global death toll has not reached the 2 million mark even if the official numbers are accurate .
If a pandemic of this nature is freaking people out so much , what is going to happen when a truly killer plague is unleashed in our society ?
The second camp either thinks that the pandemic is greatly exaggerated or that the virus doesn ’ t even exist at all .
Even though hordes of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , many out there continue to deny the reality of this crisis .
I simply do not understand that .
So many people that I know around the country have gotten the virus , and that includes quite a few big names .
For example , the following is an excerpt from an article in which Daisy Luther shares what her experience with COVID was like… Days 3-5 : Over the next three days , chills and fever were almost constant .
My joints and muscles hurt .
Getting up to go to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a mountain .
I was tired and winded .
I had very little appetite and even less of an inclination to cook food so I existed mostly on peanut butter and crackers and leftover soup .
I was absolutely exhausted and so cold that I shivered violently when I got out from under my bed piled high with blankets .
I had super-weird dreams .
My cough worsened , my head hurt , and my throat was still mildly sore .
I drank lots of water and electrolyte beverages .
My thirst remained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I took vitamins ( C , D3 ) and took Zinc supplements .
These are my regular supplements but I doubled that .
Days 6-9 : The line to get a test at the local clinic was long and filled with people who were coughing up a lung .
There was no way I ’ d be able to stand in that line for an hour , as sick as I felt .
Besides , I figured if I didn ’ t have Covid , I ’ d get it standing in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be tested .
This part made me think of the worst case of the flu I ever had , except intensified by about four times .
It was terrible .
I usually let a fever run its course but by Saturday I felt so awful that I gave in and began treating symptoms .
My normal temp is in the 96s and my temperature throughout these days stayed between 101-103 .
I staggered ibuprofen and acetaminophen , and I also used a mild muscle relaxant and my Ventilyn inhaler .
The meds didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but reduced the chills to a tolerable level .
I slept almost around the clock , waking up for a couple of hours here and there to check on website stuff .
Fortunately , I have a wonderful team who kept things running for us .
One day blurred into the next and I considered going to the doctor again , but couldn ’ t muster the energy .
I felt like if I just got a little more sleep I ’ d be okay .
My cough was getting far worse and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It was a deep painful cough that caused me to clutch my chest every single time inhaled deeply .
So to summarize , yes the COVID pandemic is real , but it is not the end of the world .
More people are going to get sick , and some will suffer intensely , but the vast majority of those that get the virus will survive .
If you want to wear a mask , then wear a mask .
If you don ’ t want to wear a mask , then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We should be free to make our own choices , and we should also be free to experience the consequences for those choices .
Unfortunately , there are way too many people out there that think that they have the right to censor and control what we say and what we do , and that trend is likely to only get worse as our society continues to spin out of control in the years ahead .

More Mind Controlling Propaganda From The Same Propagandists That Brought You The First Act: “Scary” Mutant COVID In South Africa More Dangerous Than “Super COVID” In UK
A new mutant strain of COVID-19 that has been dubbed “501.V2” has gotten completely out of control in South Africa, and authorities are telling us that it is an even bigger threat than the “Super COVID” that has been causing so much panic in the United Kingdom. Of course, viruses mutate all the time, and so it isn’t a surprise that COVID-19 has been mutating. But mutations can become a major issue when they fundamentally alter the way that a virus affects humans, and we are being told that “501.V2” is much more transmissible than previous versions of COVID and that even young people are catching it a lot more easily. That is potentially a huge concern because up until now young people have not been hit very hard by the COVID pandemic.
The British press is using the word “scary” to describe this new variant, and at this point, it has become the overwhelmingly dominant strain in South Africa…
The new mutant, called 501.V2, was announced in Cape Town last Friday and is believed to be a more extreme variant than Britain’s new Covid strain which has plunged millions into miserable Christmas lockdowns. Cases in South Africa have soared from fewer than 3,000 a day at the start of December to more than 9,500 per day, with the mutant accounting for up to 90 percent of those new infections.
If this same pattern happens elsewhere as this new mutant strain travels around the globe, then “501.V2” could eventually almost entirely replace all of the older versions of COVID.
Authorities are optimistically telling us that the recent vaccines that have been developed will “likely” work against this new variant, but the truth is that they will not know until testing is done.
And if the vaccines don’t work against “501.V2”, we could be back to square one very rapidly.
For now, countries all over the globe are banning flights from South Africa in a desperate attempt to isolate this new version. The UK, Germany, Switzerland, Turkey and Israel are among the nations that have banned those flights, but so far the United States is not on that list.
So people that are potentially carrying this new version of COVID continue to enter the U.S. on a daily basis.
For the United Kingdom, this flight ban may have come too late because two cases of “501.V2” have already been identified on British soil…
Two cases of a new, “more transmissible” COVID-19 variant linked to South Africa have been identified in the UK, the health secretary has said. Both cases are contacts of people who travelled from South Africa over the last few weeks, Matt Hancock said at a Downing Street news conference.
If the new vaccines are effective against “501.V2”, authorities believe that they already have the long-term answer to this new variant.
But if those vaccines don’t work, this pandemic could be entering a far more deadly new phase.
And of course, we are hearing about more problems with these new vaccines on a daily basis. Thousands of adverse reactions have already been reported to the CDC, and more reports continue to pour in as more people get the shots. Here is one example from New York City…
A health care worker in New York City had a serious adverse reaction to a coronavirus vaccine, officials said on Wednesday. New York City Health Commissioner David Chokshi said during a news conference that the unidentified worker experienced a “significant allergic reaction” to the vaccine. He added that the worker was treated for the reaction, and is in stable condition and recovering.
We should not be surprised that there are major issues with experimental mRNA vaccines that are based on entirely new technology that were rushed into production without proper testing.
And of course, there are tens of millions of Americans that will never take any mRNA vaccine that literally “hijacks your cells” under any circumstances.
On the other hand, most of the U.S. population seems to think that these new vaccines will bring this pandemic to an end, but if they don’t work against new mutant versions of the virus that won’t be true at all.
It is so important to take a balanced view of these things.
Unfortunately, when it comes to COVID most people fall into two camps.
The first camp is totally freaked out because they think that COVID is about the worst thing that could ever happen to the United States and they tend to favor extremely draconian measures to prevent the spread of the virus.
But the truth is that the COVID pandemic pales in comparison to other great pandemics throughout human history. The Black Plague and the Spanish Flu Pandemic each killed at least 50 million people. As for the COVID pandemic, the global death toll has not reached the 2 million mark even if the official numbers are accurate. If a pandemic of this nature is freaking people out so much, what is going to happen when a truly killer plague is unleashed in our society?
The second camp either thinks that the pandemic is greatly exaggerated or that the virus doesn’t even exist at all. Even though hordes of people are catching the virus all around us, many out there continue to deny the reality of this crisis.
I simply do not understand that. So many people that I know around the country have gotten the virus, and that includes quite a few big names. For example, the following is an excerpt from an article in which Daisy Luther shares what her experience with COVID was like…
Days 3-5: Over the next three days, chills and fever were almost constant. My joints and muscles hurt. Getting up to go to the bathroom felt like an expedition up a mountain. I was tired and winded. I had very little appetite and even less of an inclination to cook food so I existed mostly on peanut butter and crackers and leftover soup. I was absolutely exhausted and so cold that I shivered violently when I got out from under my bed piled high with blankets. I had super-weird dreams. My cough worsened, my head hurt, and my throat was still mildly sore. I drank lots of water and electrolyte beverages. My thirst remained unquenchable regardless of how much I drank. I took vitamins (C, D3) and took Zinc supplements. These are my regular supplements but I doubled that. Days 6-9: The line to get a test at the local clinic was long and filled with people who were coughing up a lung. There was no way I’d be able to stand in that line for an hour, as sick as I felt. Besides, I figured if I didn’t have Covid, I’d get it standing in the line so I opted not to be tested. This part made me think of the worst case of the flu I ever had, except intensified by about four times. It was terrible. I usually let a fever run its course but by Saturday I felt so awful that I gave in and began treating symptoms. My normal temp is in the 96s and my temperature throughout these days stayed between 101-103. I staggered ibuprofen and acetaminophen, and I also used a mild muscle relaxant and my Ventilyn inhaler. The meds didn’t get rid of my fever but reduced the chills to a tolerable level. I slept almost around the clock, waking up for a couple of hours here and there to check on website stuff. Fortunately, I have a wonderful team who kept things running for us. One day blurred into the next and I considered going to the doctor again, but couldn’t muster the energy. I felt like if I just got a little more sleep I’d be okay. My cough was getting far worse and now my ribs and abdominal muscles hurt. It was a deep painful cough that caused me to clutch my chest every single time inhaled deeply.
So to summarize, yes the COVID pandemic is real, but it is not the end of the world.
More people are going to get sick, and some will suffer intensely, but the vast majority of those that get the virus will survive.
If you want to wear a mask, then wear a mask.
If you don’t want to wear a mask, then don’t wear a mask.
We should be free to make our own choices, and we should also be free to experience the consequences for those choices.
Unfortunately, there are way too many people out there that think that they have the right to censor and control what we say and what we do, and that trend is likely to only get worse as our society continues to spin out of control in the years ahead.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-24--An Honest Portrayal Of Media & The Deep State… On Netflix!

It isn ’ t often that a media offering depicts a poignant example of how and why things are the way they truly are in real life , but I recently happened upon one that I ’ d like to discuss here .
“ Manhunt : Deadly Games ” is a limited series that premiered on Netflix this year and which depicts a fictionalized account of the FBI ’ s hunt for Eric Rudolph , the perpetrator of the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing and other bombings across the southern U.S. during the same time period .
“ Deadly Games @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that delivered “ Manhunt : Unabomber ” for The Discovery Channel in 2017 .
As many will be aware , Netflix is one of those streaming networks that discriminating viewers consider with a jaded eye .
Earlier this year , the network was slammed over its film “ Cuties , ” which shamelessly sexualized prepubescent girls .
Some readers will be acquainted with the network ’ s deal with Barack and Michelle Obama .
Inked in 2018 , the arrangement calls for the Obamas to produce “ a diverse mix of content.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as to precisely how this will pan out , but it ’ s a cinch that anything that pair puts forth will be thoroughly subversive cultural rot .
So , it is nearly bracing if unexpected when Netflix airs something that hits the nail so squarely on the head .
Whether or not it was intended , “ Manhunt : Deadly Games ” is as much about how the FBI and the establishment press conspired to frame security guard Richard Jewell for the Olympic Park bombing , despite experts from the Bureau of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) having known that Jewell could not have carried out the bombing from early in the crime scene analysis .
Picking up on stories by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution ’ s terminally ambitious Kathy Scruggs , the FBI and the national press advanced the story that Jewell was a cop-wannabe loser who lived with his mom and actually planted the explosive device so that he could be a “ hero.
” Jewell ’ s life was subsequently destroyed , as one might imagine : The Olympic Park bombing killed two and injured well over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come to see the Olympics .
Jewell was never officially cleared by the FBI , even when Eric Rudolph , a psychopath with a penchant for mayhem , was formally charged with the Olympic Park and other bombings ; it is primarily through two interviews with CBS ’ “ 60 Minutes ” program that the former security guard got a fair airing of his story .
In truth , he had discovered the explosive device while working security at the venue and alerted police to its presence .
In the attempts to evacuate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , hundreds of lives were indeed saved .
While a great deal of the program focuses on the FBI ’ s fumbling attempts to apprehend Eric Rudolph ( whom they flatly refused to consider as a suspect for the Olympic Park bombing until very late in the game ) , the duplicity of the FBI and the press figure very prominently .
We can certainly understand the zeal of Atlanta reporter Kathy Scruggs and the pressure that was on the FBI to name a suspect .
It was also quite proper for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” angle .
However , we can also see how Scruggs played fast and loose with her reporting and how the FBI dismissed exculpatory evidence , tried to entrap Jewell during interviews and let their egos drive the bus .
Finally , we can readily see the lack of ethics that went into the summary sacrifice of Jewell as a USDA Grade A scumbag by the press .
Now , we could say that unflattering representations in “ Deadly Games ” are colored by how certain characters were depicted , but considering how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the pre-Trump federal government , the dim view this program sheds on both says a lot .
“ Deadly Games ” indicates something astute news viewers have suspected for years – that the FBI ’ s law enforcement chops aren ’ t nearly what they used to be , and that the organization has devolved into an elitist bureaucracy whose upper-echelon members are far more about politics than they are law enforcement .
As Special Agent Jack Brennan and his team lead the hunt for serial bomber Eric Rudolph in the hills @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shown how Rudolph played both local militias and the FBI as fools .
“ Deadly Games ” even makes the militias appear more forthright , savvy and well-coordinated than the FBI , something I ’ m sure the producers were not trying to do .
One of the really great representations in this production was that of Louis Freeh , the FBI director under Bill Clinton .
Freeh is portrayed by Desmond Harrington , who brilliantly captures the Clintonista ’ s narcissistic , craven posturing and deep state affinities .
Between the machinations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s shady maneuvering and the malicious , cavalier deportment of the national press , it is very easy to see how we wound up where we are today in the real world .
More importantly , it is easy to see how we wound up with an FBI compromised to the degree that it would collude with rouge elements in Congress to attempt to oust a duly-elected president .
As often as life tends to imitate the sick art of Hollywood these days , it is refreshing to see art imitate life for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

It isn’t often that a media offering depicts a poignant example of how and why things are the way they truly are in real life, but I recently happened upon one that I’d like to discuss here. “Manhunt: Deadly Games ” is a limited series that premiered on Netflix this year and which depicts a fictionalized account of the FBI’s hunt for Eric Rudolph, the perpetrator of the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing and other bombings across the southern U.S. during the same time period. “Deadly Games” was produced by the same team that delivered “Manhunt: Unabomber ” for The Discovery Channel in 2017.
As many will be aware, Netflix is one of those streaming networks that discriminating viewers consider with a jaded eye. Earlier this year, the network was slammed over its film “Cuties,” which shamelessly sexualized prepubescent girls. Some readers will be acquainted with the network’s deal with Barack and Michelle Obama. Inked in 2018, the arrangement calls for the Obamas to produce “a diverse mix of content.” It’s anyone’s guess as to precisely how this will pan out, but it’s a cinch that anything that pair puts forth will be thoroughly subversive cultural rot.
So, it is nearly bracing if unexpected when Netflix airs something that hits the nail so squarely on the head.
Whether or not it was intended, “Manhunt: Deadly Games” is as much about how the FBI and the establishment press conspired to frame security guard Richard Jewell for the Olympic Park bombing, despite experts from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) having known that Jewell could not have carried out the bombing from early in the crime scene analysis.
Picking up on stories by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s terminally ambitious Kathy Scruggs, the FBI and the national press advanced the story that Jewell was a cop-wannabe loser who lived with his mom and actually planted the explosive device so that he could be a “hero.” Jewell’s life was subsequently destroyed, as one might imagine: The Olympic Park bombing killed two and injured well over 100 innocent people who’d just come to see the Olympics.
Jewell was never officially cleared by the FBI, even when Eric Rudolph, a psychopath with a penchant for mayhem, was formally charged with the Olympic Park and other bombings; it is primarily through two interviews with CBS’ “60 Minutes” program that the former security guard got a fair airing of his story. In truth, he had discovered the explosive device while working security at the venue and alerted police to its presence. In the attempts to evacuate the area prior to the bomb detonating, hundreds of lives were indeed saved.
While a great deal of the program focuses on the FBI’s fumbling attempts to apprehend Eric Rudolph (whom they flatly refused to consider as a suspect for the Olympic Park bombing until very late in the game), the duplicity of the FBI and the press figure very prominently.
We can certainly understand the zeal of Atlanta reporter Kathy Scruggs and the pressure that was on the FBI to name a suspect. It was also quite proper for the FBI to consider the “hero bomber” angle. However, we can also see how Scruggs played fast and loose with her reporting and how the FBI dismissed exculpatory evidence, tried to entrap Jewell during interviews and let their egos drive the bus. Finally, we can readily see the lack of ethics that went into the summary sacrifice of Jewell as a USDA Grade A scumbag by the press.
Now, we could say that unflattering representations in “Deadly Games” are colored by how certain characters were depicted, but considering how positively Hollywood tends to depict the press and the pre-Trump federal government, the dim view this program sheds on both says a lot. “Deadly Games” indicates something astute news viewers have suspected for years – that the FBI’s law enforcement chops aren’t nearly what they used to be, and that the organization has devolved into an elitist bureaucracy whose upper-echelon members are far more about politics than they are law enforcement.
As Special Agent Jack Brennan and his team lead the hunt for serial bomber Eric Rudolph in the hills of North Carolina, we’re shown how Rudolph played both local militias and the FBI as fools. “Deadly Games” even makes the militias appear more forthright, savvy and well-coordinated than the FBI, something I’m sure the producers were not trying to do.
One of the really great representations in this production was that of Louis Freeh, the FBI director under Bill Clinton. Freeh is portrayed by Desmond Harrington, who brilliantly captures the Clintonista’s narcissistic, craven posturing and deep state affinities. Between the machinations of this utter weasel, Brennan’s shady maneuvering and the malicious, cavalier deportment of the national press, it is very easy to see how we wound up where we are today in the real world. More importantly, it is easy to see how we wound up with an FBI compromised to the degree that it would collude with rouge elements in Congress to attempt to oust a duly-elected president.
As often as life tends to imitate the sick art of Hollywood these days, it is refreshing to see art imitate life for a change, and with reasonable accuracy.
Article posted with permission from Erik Rush


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-24--Trump Kicks COVID Bill Back To Congress – Demands More Socialism With $2,000 Checks Instead Of $600

Trump Kicks COVID Bill Back To Congress – Demands More Socialism With $ 2,000 Checks Instead Of $ 600 I covered the story just before President Donald Trump kicked the bill back to Congress , as well as on Thursday ’ s The Sons of Liberty morning show .
Though He rightly called out the “ unnecessary and wasteful ” spending in the bill , he failed to mention it was unconstitutional .
In other words , it ’ s unAmerican and unlawful .
Additionally , he pitted the massive amounts of unlawful spending up against the unlawful spending of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to raise the checks to Americans , which is also unconstitutional , from $ 600 to $ 2,000 .
Congress appears to show that was their plan all along .
• Not Enough Socialism !
President Trump Blasts Congress For Not Giving Significantly Larger Checks To Americans • More Socialism : Congress Set To Unlawfully Steal & Devalue Your Money , Redistribute It , & Fund All Sorts Of Unconstitutional Items Just In Time To Save Their Own Necks • America ’ s Representatives Are Again Passing Unconstitutional Bills With Billions Going To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to veto the COVID-19 stimulus package that Congress passed almost 24 hours earlier , telling lawmakers to boost checks for Americans to $ 2,000 as well as “ get rid of wasteful and unnecessary items ” in the spending bill Trump said “ throughout the summer , Democrats cruelly blocked COVID relief legislation in an effort to advance their extreme left wing agenda and influence the election… ” “ it ’ s taken forever ” to get a package and the bill passed “ is much different than anticipated.
” “ It really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Then reeled off a list of disgusting ‘ pork ’ ( read the details here ) that has been piled into this record-breaking 5,593-page bill .
As Axios notes , many of the items Trump listed , such as foreign aid , which were not related to COVID-19 are not part of the coronavirus relief package .
These form part of the government funding bill , which was passed alongside the coronavirus relief package .
Then he took a shot at Biden and the election ..and the market is not happy… See @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unconstitutionally against the people here , and the more the people are divided in their party mentality , the more the tyrants are gaining ground .
Our forefathers warned us about this… Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Trump Kicks COVID Bill Back To Congress – Demands More Socialism With $2,000 Checks Instead Of $600
I covered the story just before President Donald Trump kicked the bill back to Congress, as well as on Thursday’s The Sons of Liberty morning show. Though He rightly called out the “unnecessary and wasteful” spending in the bill, he failed to mention it was unconstitutional. In other words, it’s unAmerican and unlawful. Additionally, he pitted the massive amounts of unlawful spending up against the unlawful spending of checks for Americans, calling on Congress to raise the checks to Americans, which is also unconstitutional, from $600 to $2,000. Congress appears to show that was their plan all along.
Tyler Durden has the story.
President Trump appeared to threaten to veto the COVID-19 stimulus package that Congress passed almost 24 hours earlier, telling lawmakers to boost checks for Americans to $2,000 as well as “get rid of wasteful and unnecessary items” in the spending bill
Trump said “throughout the summer, Democrats cruelly blocked COVID relief legislation in an effort to advance their extreme left wing agenda and influence the election…” “it’s taken forever” to get a package and the bill passed “is much different than anticipated.” “It really is a disgrace,” he added.
Then reeled off a list of disgusting ‘pork’ (read the details here) that has been piled into this record-breaking 5,593-page bill.
As Axios notes, many of the items Trump listed, such as foreign aid, which were not related to COVID-19 are not part of the coronavirus relief package. These form part of the government funding bill, which was passed alongside the coronavirus relief package.
Then he took a shot at Biden and the election
“Send me a suitable bill or else the next administration will have to deliver a COVID relief package and maybe that administration will be me and we will get it done.”
Watch the full statement here:
..and the market is not happy…
Get back to Mrs.Pelosi!
See? Both Republicans and Democrats are acting unconstitutionally against the people here, and the more the people are divided in their party mentality, the more the tyrants are gaining ground. Our forefathers warned us about this…
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-12-24--5 Outrageous Items Snuck in the “COVID Stimulus” Bill

We already know there is a ton of unconstitutional spending that was stuffed into the COVID Stimulus Bill .
The more that comes out , the greater the crimes are apparent of DC politicians who deserve to be tossed out on their derrieres and charged with crimes against the people of the united States .
Here ’ s five more things that were snuck into the bill of which Americans should be aware .
• Congress Advocates Socialism In COVID Bill – Trump Ups Them With More Money • Trump Kicks COVID Bill Back To Congress – Demands More Socialism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 600 • Criminalizing Of Online Streaming & Meme Sharing Language Stuffed In Omnibus Bill Before Trump • Not Enough Socialism !
President Trump Blasts Congress For Not Giving Significantly Larger Checks To Americans • America ’ s Representatives Are Again Passing Unconstitutional Bills With Billions Going To Foreign Countries • It Took Government Less Time To Approve COVID-19 Vaccine Than A $ 600 Check For Citizens • More Socialism : Congress Set To Unlawfully Steal & Devalue Your Money , Redistribute It , & Fund All Sorts Of Unconstitutional Items Just In Time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wait for their $ 600 stimulus check , the rich get richer and the U.S. government ignores the needs of the people .
The U.S. Congress has approved the largest spending bill ever , disguised as a “ COVID-19 Stimulus Bill ” .
The “ Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021 ” has been promoted by politicians and mainstream media as a government effort to provide the people with relief from the ravages of COVID-19 and government enforced lockdowns .
Unfortunately , the people have once again been shafted .
Even mainstream propaganda outlet The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breaks for lobbyists : While the bill does allocate billions for the “ fight against COVID-19 , ” the bulk of the funds ( $ 22.4 billion ) are going towards “ expenses for testing , tracing , surveillance ” , including “ molecular , antigen and serological tests , the manufacturing , procurement & distribution of tests.
” Of course , these funds for testing make no mention of the many problems associated with the PCR test that is commonly used .
However , the vast majority of the “ stimulus bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 .
This includes expanding of 5G networks as part of the “ Beat China by Harnessing Important , National Airwaves for 5G Act of 2020 ’ ’ aka the ‘ ‘ Beat CHINA for 5G Act of 2020 ’ ’ .
There is also a provision allocating “ not less than $ 15 million ” for “ democracy programs ” and no less than $ 10 million for “ gender programs ” in Pakistan .
It ’ s clear that the passing of the bill by the U.S. Congress is another spit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasingly unemployed , facing food shortages and depending on food banks at rates not seen in generations .
Although Donald Trump has threatened to veto the bill – calling for up to $ 2,000 for every American – the reality is that many of his agendas stand to benefit from his signing of the bill .
Here are 5 more ways the “ stimulus bill ” is screwing over the American people and serving the will of the corporate state : While Americans scrape by , the U.S. government is preparing to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Sudan , Ukraine , Israel , Burma , Pakistan , and Cambodia .
The U.S. Congress also managed to sneak in $ 33 million for “ democracy programs for Venezuela ” , a clear continuation of regime change efforts in that nation .
Additionally , Ukraine will be given $ 275 million “ to provide assistance , including training ; equipment ; lethal assistance ; logistics support , supplies and services ; sustainment ; and intelligence.
” Another section of the bill gives $ 453 million for “ assistance for Ukraine.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the effort to destabilize Russia and give the U.S. a foothold in the region long into the future .
Section 313 of the bill , Public Awareness Campaign on the Importance of Vaccinations , calls on the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to award grants and contracts for “ public or private entities ” for a “ national , evidence-based campaign to increase awareness and knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
” The section also calls for fighting “ misinformation about vaccines ” and promoting “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaigns to promote vaccines and combat “ misinformation ” would include “ the use of television , radio , the internet , and other media and telecommunications technologies.
” The stimulus bill also includes controversial copyright and trademark measures which could create confusion and potentially criminalize online streaming .
TechDirt reported that , “ small changes can not only have a massive impact , that impact can be on the public ’ s ability to express themselves .
The idea that two such bills should be jammed through in this manner is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Deputy Director for Fight for the Future , accused congressional leaders of ignoring the American people and serving Hollywood companies like Disney .
Greer and Fight for the Future warn that changes to copyright law could have “ profound implications ” for online freedom of expression .
“ The CASE Act is a terribly written law that will threaten ordinary Internet users with huge fines for everyday online activity , ” Greer stated .
“ It ’ s absurd that lawmakers included these provisions in a must-pass spending bill.
” Of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not be complete without replenishing the stocked arsenal of the U.S. military .
DefenseNews noted the bill includes “ $ 627.3 billion in base funding and $ 68.7 billion in wartime overseas contingency operations funding.
” Here is a ( partial ) rundown of what various departments have been awarded as part of the “ stimulus ” bill : A “ COVID-19 Stimulus ” bill wouldn ’ t be complete without giving billions to the Global Vaccine Alliance , founded and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
As TLAV has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already awarded GAVI billions of dollars earlier this year .
Under a section titled Global Health Programs , the stimulus bill allocates $ 4 billion dollars to “ prevent , prepare for , and respond to coronavirus , including for vaccine procurement and delivery.
” These funds will be administered the United States Agency for International Development and “ shall be made available as a contribution to The GAVI Alliance.
” On page 1278 , there is another provision for $ 3.2 billion made available to GAVI .
Interestingly , there is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made available in this Act ” should be made available to any organization which “ supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.
” It ’ s important to recognize that the politicians , lobbyists , and corporate partners – what we call the Predator Class – do not care if Americans suffer .
They are perfectly content with watching the economy crash and Americans suffer .
This is because their agenda is The Great Reset , the reimagining of not only the American economy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hope is for the American people – and the people of the world – to get organized and push for a Greater Reset .

We already know there is a ton of unconstitutional spending that was stuffed into the COVID Stimulus Bill. The more that comes out, the greater the crimes are apparent of DC politicians who deserve to be tossed out on their derrieres and charged with crimes against the people of the united States. Here’s five more things that were snuck into the bill of which Americans should be aware.
Derrick Broze writes:
As Americans wait for their $600 stimulus check, the rich get richer and the U.S. government ignores the needs of the people.
The U.S. Congress has approved the largest spending bill ever, disguised as a “COVID-19 Stimulus Bill”. The “Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021” has been promoted by politicians and mainstream media as a government effort to provide the people with relief from the ravages of COVID-19 and government enforced lockdowns. Unfortunately, the people have once again been shafted.
Even mainstream propaganda outlet The Washington Post noted the presence of tax breaks for lobbyists:
These measures, added onto the broader spending bill, are known as “tax extenders” — tax breaks targeted at specific, sometimes niche industries. And routinely extending these “temporary” measures has become something of a year-end tradition, despite loud complaints from some lawmakers who allege the votes largely benefit special-interest groups who stand to gain financially from the outcome.
While the bill does allocate billions for the “fight against COVID-19,” the bulk of the funds ($22.4 billion) are going towards “expenses for testing, tracing, surveillance”, including “molecular, antigen and serological tests, the manufacturing, procurement & distribution of tests.” Of course, these funds for testing make no mention of the many problems associated with the PCR test that is commonly used.
However, the vast majority of the “stimulus bill” goes to items unrelated to fighting COVID-19. This includes expanding of 5G networks as part of the “Beat China by Harnessing Important, National Airwaves for 5G Act of 2020’’ aka the ‘‘Beat CHINA for 5G Act of 2020’’. There is also a provision allocating “not less than $15 million” for “democracy programs” and no less than $10 million for “gender programs” in Pakistan.
It’s clear that the passing of the bill by the U.S. Congress is another spit in the face of Americans who are increasingly unemployed, facing food shortages and depending on food banks at rates not seen in generations. Although Donald Trump has threatened to veto the bill – calling for up to $2,000 for every American – the reality is that many of his agendas stand to benefit from his signing of the bill.
Here are 5 more ways the “stimulus bill” is screwing over the American people and serving the will of the corporate state:
1. Billions to Foreign Nations
While Americans scrape by, the U.S. government is preparing to give billions to foreign nations, including Egypt, Sudan, Ukraine, Israel, Burma, Pakistan, and Cambodia.
The U.S. Congress also managed to sneak in $33 million for “democracy programs for Venezuela”, a clear continuation of regime change efforts in that nation. Additionally, Ukraine will be given $275 million “to provide assistance, including training; equipment; lethal assistance; logistics support, supplies and services; sustainment; and intelligence.” Another section of the bill gives $453 million for “assistance for Ukraine.” The funds for Ukraine are likely part of the effort to destabilize Russia and give the U.S. a foothold in the region long into the future.
2. Combating Vaccine “Misinformation”
Section 313 of the bill, Public Awareness Campaign on the Importance of Vaccinations, calls on the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to award grants and contracts for “public or private entities” for a “national, evidence-based campaign to increase awareness and knowledge of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.” The section also calls for fighting “misinformation about vaccines” and promoting “scientific and evidence-based vaccine-related information.”
The campaigns to promote vaccines and combat “misinformation” would include “the use of television, radio, the internet, and other media and telecommunications technologies.”
3. Making Online Streaming a Felony
The stimulus bill also includes controversial copyright and trademark measures which could create confusion and potentially criminalize online streaming. TechDirt reported that, “small changes can not only have a massive impact, that impact can be on the public’s ability to express themselves. The idea that two such bills should be jammed through in this manner is a total and complete travesty.”
Evan Greer, the Deputy Director for Fight for the Future, accused congressional leaders of ignoring the American people and serving Hollywood companies like Disney. Greer and Fight for the Future warn that changes to copyright law could have “profound implications” for online freedom of expression.
“The CASE Act is a terribly written law that will threaten ordinary Internet users with huge fines for everyday online activity,” Greer stated. “It’s absurd that lawmakers included these provisions in a must-pass spending bill.”
4. Billions to the War Machine
Of course, a 5,000 page bill would not be complete without replenishing the stocked arsenal of the U.S. military. DefenseNews noted the bill includes “$627.3 billion in base funding and $68.7 billion in wartime overseas contingency operations funding.” Here is a (partial) rundown of what various departments have been awarded as part of the “stimulus” bill:
Department of the Army – $288,750,000
Department of the Air Force – $509,250,000
Department of the Navy – $421,250,000
Department of the Army – $264,285,000
Department of Defense – $19,952,000
Columbia Class Submarine – $2,869,024,000
Columbia Class Submarine (AP) – $1,253,175,000
Virginia Class Submarine – $4,603,213,000;
5. Billions to Gates-Founded GAVI
A “COVID-19 Stimulus” bill wouldn’t be complete without giving billions to the Global Vaccine Alliance, founded and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. As TLAV has previously reported, the Trump Administration has already awarded GAVI billions of dollars earlier this year.
Under a section titled Global Health Programs, the stimulus bill allocates $4 billion dollars to “prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, including for vaccine procurement and delivery.” These funds will be administered the United States Agency for International Development and “shall be made available as a contribution to The GAVI Alliance.” On page 1278, there is another provision for $3.2 billion made available to GAVI.
Interestingly, there is a notice that “none of the funds made available in this Act” should be made available to any organization which “supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”
What’s left for the people?
It’s important to recognize that the politicians, lobbyists, and corporate partners – what we call the Predator Class – do not care if Americans suffer. They are perfectly content with watching the economy crash and Americans suffer. This is because their agenda is The Great Reset, the reimagining of not only the American economy, but the global economy.
The only hope is for the American people – and the people of the world – to get organized and push for a Greater Reset.