thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-29--Tennessee:  Court Forces Cop To Pay $1 Million In His Own Money To Family He Terrorized & Called Rac

Tennessee : Court Forces Cop To Pay $ 1 Million In His Own Money To Family He Terrorized & Called Racial Slurs Nashville , TN — As the Free Thought Project has reported extensively , police officers , even when found at fault for their abusive actions , are almost never held personally liable .
It is the taxpayers who foot the bill .
However , a trend in accountability seems to be happening more often , and will be massively more effective at curbing police brutality than any system in place right now .
Cops are being forced to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pockets .
The most recent case of a cop being held personally liable for his crimes comes from Nashville , Tenn. A now-former NYPD cop , Michael J. Reynolds has been ordered to pay $ 1 million by a federal judge for breaking down the door to an innocent family ’ s home and terrorizing them in the middle of the night .
Federal Judge Eli Richardson mandated that Reynolds pay $ 1 million to Conese Halliburton for kicking in the front door and terrorizing her family , which was all captured on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As the Tennessean reports , Halliburton said she was home with her sons when Reynolds kicked in the front door of her 12 South-area residence and barged in .
Video surveillance showed Reynolds screaming and threatening the family and using racist slurs .
Reynolds can be heard saying in the video , “ Try to shoot me , and I ’ ll break every f—ing bone in your f—ing neck , ” before calling them “ f—ing n——.
” For over 8 minutes , Reynolds threatened to kill Halliburton and her two sons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slurs .
He didn ’ t leave until Halliburton told him that police were on the way .
When confronted by police , Reynolds ’ blue privilege kicked in and he laughed it off with cops , apologizing with a smile on his face .
“ We are police from New York .
You don ’ t need to make a big deal about it .
We were just drinking , ” said Officer Thomas Geberth , according to court testimony , during the confrontation .
Reynolds was not immediately arrested and only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — barely .
For breaking into an innocent family ’ s home , threatening to kill them , and effectively holding them hostage for 8 minutes , this cop received just 15 days in jail and did not lose his job .
He only resigned later due to national outcry that he was not fired .
“ Ms .
Halliburton promised from the beginning that she would hold ex-Officer Reynolds fully accountable for his criminal misconduct and obtain justice for her family regarding this despicable incident , ” said Nashville attorney Daniel A.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ We are certainly pleased with this development , but we also aren ’ t finished here.
” Though it is unlikely that Halliburton will ever see the full payment , this is s step in the right direction in holding bad cops accountable .
Sadly , if Reynolds would have been on duty when he terrorized this family , it would have been swept under the rug and no one would have known any difference .
Halliburton created a GoFundMe online fundraiser earlier this year to help with legal costs , if you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ please consider donating .
As TFTP has previously reported , although police officers being held personally liable is fairly rare , it is happening more and more .
Earlier this year , a Hadley Police Officer was sentenced to 14 months in prison and forced to pay a man $ 2,204 in restitution .
In 2017 , Hadley Police Officer Christopher Roeder broke a man ’ s nose on video .
He was found guilty of deprivation of rights under color of law , and falsifying his police report involving the 2017 arrest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was forced to use his own money to compensate his victim .
Palm Beach County Sheriff ’ s Deputy Adam Lin ’ s case is another example of cops coming out of pocket to pay for their crimes .
In 2013 , Lin spotted 19-year-old Dontrell Stephens in a “ high-crime area ” — the man ’ s own low-income neighborhood — riding a bicycle in a manner the deputy found suspicious .
Lin stopped the youth , who dismounted the bike with a cell phone in his hand and slowly approached @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of dash cam video , the officer shot Stephens four times — claiming he was in fear for his life — but footage and evidence clearly showed the claim to be baseless .
Three of the bullets remain lodged in Stephens ’ body , according to the Sun Sentinel — two in his arm and one in his spine , which left him paralyzed and dependent on a wheelchair for mobility .
In 2017 , Stephens won a massive $ 22.4 million settlement and U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry Seltzer ruled that Lin should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bill .
Last month , nearly everything this officer owned was seized to pay back Stephens — including everything from his furniture to his clothing .
Lin will most assuredly think twice before shooting another unarmed teen .
Imagine , for a moment , the result of all police officers being held personally liable for their actions and forced to pay their victims .
In nearly every other profession on the planet , if someone hurts someone else while on the job , they are held liable — personally .
Why can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like doctors ?
As instances of police brutality and police killings continue to be exposed , there is no doubt that the US is in dire need of reform .
The simple requirement for police to be insured for personal liability is an easy fix — especially to remove repeat offenders from the force .
All too often , when a tragic death such as George Floyd occurs , months later we find out that the officer should have never been given a badge and a gun in the first place because of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who can ’ t fleece the taxpayers to pay for problem cops , would have to come out of pocket to pay for them and would make sure that these officers are uninsurable .
If the officer becomes uninsurable , the officer becomes unhirable — simple as that .

Tennessee: Court Forces Cop To Pay $1 Million In His Own Money To Family He Terrorized & Called Racial Slurs
Nashville, TN — As the Free Thought Project has reported extensively, police officers, even when found at fault for their abusive actions, are almost never held personally liable. It is the taxpayers who foot the bill. However, a trend in accountability seems to be happening more often, and will be massively more effective at curbing police brutality than any system in place right now. Cops are being forced to pay their victims out of their own pockets.
The most recent case of a cop being held personally liable for his crimes comes from Nashville, Tenn. A now-former NYPD cop, Michael J. Reynolds has been ordered to pay $1 million by a federal judge for breaking down the door to an innocent family’s home and terrorizing them in the middle of the night.
Federal Judge Eli Richardson mandated that Reynolds pay $1 million to Conese Halliburton for kicking in the front door and terrorizing her family, which was all captured on the family’s surveillance cameras.
As the Tennessean reports, Halliburton said she was home with her sons when Reynolds kicked in the front door of her 12 South-area residence and barged in. Video surveillance showed Reynolds screaming and threatening the family and using racist slurs.
Reynolds can be heard saying in the video, “Try to shoot me, and I’ll break every f—ing bone in your f—ing neck,” before calling them “f—ing n——.”
For over 8 minutes, Reynolds threatened to kill Halliburton and her two sons, all the while calling them racial slurs. He didn’t leave until Halliburton told him that police were on the way.
When confronted by police, Reynolds’ blue privilege kicked in and he laughed it off with cops, apologizing with a smile on his face.
“We are police from New York. You don’t need to make a big deal about it. We were just drinking,” said Officer Thomas Geberth, according to court testimony, during the confrontation.
Reynolds was not immediately arrested and only after public backlash was he held accountable — barely. For breaking into an innocent family’s home, threatening to kill them, and effectively holding them hostage for 8 minutes, this cop received just 15 days in jail and did not lose his job.
He only resigned later due to national outcry that he was not fired.
“Ms. Halliburton promised from the beginning that she would hold ex-Officer Reynolds fully accountable for his criminal misconduct and obtain justice for her family regarding this despicable incident,” said Nashville attorney Daniel A. Horwitz, who represented Halliburton. “We are certainly pleased with this development, but we also aren’t finished here.”
Though it is unlikely that Halliburton will ever see the full payment, this is s step in the right direction in holding bad cops accountable. Sadly, if Reynolds would have been on duty when he terrorized this family, it would have been swept under the rug and no one would have known any difference.
Halliburton created a GoFundMe online fundraiser earlier this year to help with legal costs, if you would like to help her out, please consider donating.
As TFTP has previously reported, although police officers being held personally liable is fairly rare, it is happening more and more.
Earlier this year, a Hadley Police Officer was sentenced to 14 months in prison and forced to pay a man $2,204 in restitution. In 2017, Hadley Police Officer Christopher Roeder broke a man’s nose on video. He was found guilty of deprivation of rights under color of law, and falsifying his police report involving the 2017 arrest. As part of his sentence, he was forced to use his own money to compensate his victim.
Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Deputy Adam Lin’s case is another example of cops coming out of pocket to pay for their crimes.
In 2013, Lin spotted 19-year-old Dontrell Stephens in a “high-crime area” — the man’s own low-income neighborhood — riding a bicycle in a manner the deputy found suspicious.
Lin stopped the youth, who dismounted the bike with a cell phone in his hand and slowly approached the officer. Just outside the range of dash cam video, the officer shot Stephens four times — claiming he was in fear for his life — but footage and evidence clearly showed the claim to be baseless.
Three of the bullets remain lodged in Stephens’ body, according to the Sun Sentinel — two in his arm and one in his spine, which left him paralyzed and dependent on a wheelchair for mobility.
In 2017, Stephens won a massive $22.4 million settlement and U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry Seltzer ruled that Lin should foot at least a portion of the bill. Last month, nearly everything this officer owned was seized to pay back Stephens — including everything from his furniture to his clothing.
Lin will most assuredly think twice before shooting another unarmed teen.
Imagine, for a moment, the result of all police officers being held personally liable for their actions and forced to pay their victims. In nearly every other profession on the planet, if someone hurts someone else while on the job, they are held liable — personally. Why can’t cops carry personal liability insurance just like doctors?
As instances of police brutality and police killings continue to be exposed, there is no doubt that the US is in dire need of reform. The simple requirement for police to be insured for personal liability is an easy fix — especially to remove repeat offenders from the force.
All too often, when a tragic death such as George Floyd occurs, months later we find out that the officer should have never been given a badge and a gun in the first place because of their past. However, insurance companies, who can’t fleece the taxpayers to pay for problem cops, would have to come out of pocket to pay for them and would make sure that these officers are uninsurable.
If the officer becomes uninsurable, the officer becomes unhirable — simple as that.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-30--I Repeat: America’s Problems Are Not Political

As readers should know by now , I adamantly refuse to get sucked into the phony left-right paradigm .
I also refuse to get on board the Trump Train .
I made a vow to God in 1996 that I would never again support a presidential candidate that I knew would be unfaithful to the Constitution and Natural liberties given us by our Creator .
As I see it , there are two basic groups of Christians who are voting for Donald Trump this year .
1 ) Those who have a god-like vision of Trump .
They truly believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ messiah-figure .
They believe he is an American Moses .
In many respects , Trump has a religious cult following .
These people believe everything he says is gospel .
They believe everything he does is by divine miracle .
2 ) Those who are good conservative , freedom-oriented believers , who recognize Trump ’ s wickedness , but who are willing to overlook those evils , believing , a ) Trump is doing enough good things to tolerate those evils and , b ) The alternative ( Joe Biden ) is so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to support Trump .
The first group is composed of seriously deluded people .
The second group could be defined as political pragmatists .
Of course , a host of non-believers , conservative in politics , would embrace the philosophy of political pragmatism .
But so do many Christians .
To them , a vote for the “ lesser of two evils ” is not a violation of their moral convictions .
In fact , they would see such an act as necessary—and even righteous .
Obviously , the power-elite manipulate political pragmatists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ level .
By stacking the deck in the general election with controlled candidates from both political parties , they ensure that no matter who wins , the establishment ’ s agenda moves forward unabated , while rank-and-file voters on both sides of the aisle believe they have voted for a difference .
It is a masterful strategy .
I firmly believe that two things are required to see through the above .
1 ) A studied understanding that there IS a cabal of very powerful people who not only conspire against the Liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are also wealthy and influential enough to actually manipulate—and even control—the major levels of leadership within countries , including their news media , educational , entertainment , medical and religious institutions .
2 ) A spiritual understanding that America ’ s strength lies in the moral courage of its pulpits .
In other words , America ’ s problems are not political ; they are spiritual .
The forces of evil have hated this country from its inception .
From the beginning , America ’ s core principles—enshrined in our Declaration of Independence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in our Creator ’ s Natural and Revealed Laws .
Christian faith and practice are at the heart of America ’ s heritage .
The quote commonly attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville may have said it best : As I brought out in my message last Sunday at Liberty Fellowship ( taken from Micah 6:1 – 8 ) , the national crises that Old Testament Israel and Judah faced were due to the way that God ’ s people—especially the kings and priests—throughout the two nations had offended God with their vile and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is the crux of America ’ s problems .
But Jerry Falwell Jr. seemed to speak for most evangelicals when he said , “ You don ’ t choose a president based on how good they are.
” I guess not .
But we used to .
There was a time in America when we expected our grocery clerks , our gas station attendants , our school teachers , our mailmen , our business managers , our repairmen , our physicians , our mechanics , our neighbors , and , yes , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Does anyone remember Gary Hart ?
And he was a Democrat .
Today , not only are pastors and Christians willing to enthusiastically support an immoral reprobate like Donald Trump but they actually believe that this immoral reprobate is America ’ s only hope .
He is America ’ s only answer .
He is God ’ s salvation for our country .
Are we not able to stop and see what is happening ?
To a vast number of evangelical Christians , America ’ s hope rests with politicians—their preferred politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , politicians are far more important to the future of America than preachers .
Acts of Congress are more important than Acts of God .
Fidelity to a political party is more important than fidelity to Holy Scripture .
Salvation comes in the form of Executive Order and Supreme Court decision , not Holy Spirit conviction and God ’ s immutable truth .
And in the case of Donald Trump , which came first : A corrupt president who is corrupting the Church or a corrupt Church that created a corrupt president ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : At this point let me plainly assert : Ever since Trump was elected in 2016 , Christians have been saying that God put Him in office .
If that ’ s true , then God is certainly able to keep Trump in office .
But if Biden is elected next week , then it must mean that God wants Biden in office .
No matter who wins the election next Tuesday , America ’ s problems will not be solved , because , again , America ’ s problems are not political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue to put their faith and trust in politicians , our problems will only worsen .
God eventually destroyed Israel and Judah due to their wickedness .
Why should He spare an unrepentant America ?
And that ’ s exactly what we have right now : An unrepentant nation and an unrepentant Church .
For example , I hear Christians constantly say the reason they vote for Donald Trump ( or for any other Republican presidential nominee ) is because he is “ pro-life.
” Really ?
As I have pointed out several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republicans controlled the entire federal government—including the Supreme Court—for the first two years of his administration .
G.W .
Bush and Republicans controlled the entire federal government for 4.6 years .
Did either of them overturn Roe ?
No , they did not .
They did not even try to overturn Roe .
Please try telling the 3.5 million babies who were surgically aborted and the 56 million babies who were chemically aborted since Trump took office how “ pro-life ” he is .
And never forget that Republican-appointed judges have been a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Roe v Wade was decided in 1973 .
That ’ s 50 consecutive years of a Republican-dominated Court .
That ’ s right : A Republican-majority court gave us Roe , and 50 years of Republican-majority courts have kept Roe intact .
Since when have we ever needed Democrats to legalize abortion-on-demand or keep it legal ?
Our family physician , Dr. Annie Bukacek , gave an excellent presentation pointing out that , as much as anything , support for phony pro-life legislation has been a major impediment to reversing Roe v Wade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidency , more federal tax dollars have been given to Planned Parenthood than when Barack Obama was president .
And speaking of federal spending , do we even dare to broach the subject of the national debt and deficit spending ?
No , because Trump has shattered all the records .
But here ’ s what evangelicals never want to talk about : Donald Trump has extended America ’ s foreign wars beyond that of Obama or GW Bush .
Donald Trump drops a bomb somewhere in the world every 12 minutes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ minutes .
Trump has dropped more bombs and missiles on Middle Eastern countries in a comparable period of time than any modern U.S. President .
Presidents Bush , Obama and now Trump have dropped over 300,000 bombs and missiles on Iraq , Afghanistan , Syria , Libya , Pakistan , Yemen and Somalia .
Trump ’ s rate of bombing eclipses both Bush and Obama .
Trump has dropped almost 200,000 bombs and missiles on Middle Eastern countries in just his first term of office—which surpasses the number of bombs and missiles dropped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and is two-thirds of all of the bombs dropped since 9/11 .
Trump began his presidency in a flurry of war , but as the 2020 elections drew nearer , he again started acting like a peace candidate .
But why do I even point that out ?
It matters to almost no one .
In addition , Trump has escalated the financial and military support for the warmongering Zionist State of Israel , which has murdered untold thousands of innocent Palestinians—both Christians and Muslims—throughout the Middle East .
I am weary—and I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world is too—with hearing evangelicals talk about how pro-life they are while at the same time supporting the wanton mass killing of innocent people all over the world via America ’ s Zionist-controlled military-industrial complex .
Reading the Old Testament prophets , one will quickly observe that Israel ’ s perpetual shedding of innocent blood was one of God ’ s chief indictments against that nation—indictments that eventually led to the nation ’ s divine execution .
Why should America be an exception ?
If the evangelical church would lose its misplaced infatuation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State of Israel and use its very powerful collective voice to call for an end to these wars for Israel and slaughter of innocent people , maybe—just maybe—God ’ s anger against us would be assuaged .
Trump talks a lot about ending America ’ s endless wars , but in reality , he ’ s done nothing about it .
And the truth is , most evangelicals would be angry if he actually did end the wars for Israel .
As Trump recently told us , the only reason we are fighting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israel ( a nation that is fully capable of defending itself and who ’ s Arab neighbors—including Iran—pose NO serious threat to it ) .
And much of the impetus for these unconstitutional and immoral wars for Israel is the pressure exerted on the White House and Congress by AIPAC and the rest of the Israeli lobby in Washington , D.C. , including the vast majority of evangelical churches .
When Trump ’ s daughter , Ivanka , went to pray for her father ’ s re-election , she went to the grave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mendel Schneerson .
Yet , many evangelicals are salivating over the idea that Ivanka might be president in 2024 .
PLEASE !
Doesn ’ t anyone see what has happened to the Church ?
To understand the terroristic and aggressive history of Zionist Israel—a violent , bloodthirsty history meticulously planned for decades before being implemented—it is imperative that you read the book The Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestine by Ilan Pappe .
With all of this said , I am not advocating for people to not vote for Donald Trump .
I have many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are still friends ) and family members who voted for Trump and will vote for him again .
I wouldn ’ t even be upset with evangelicals who voted for Trump four years ago had they made a sincere effort to hold Trump accountable to the principles of constitutional government during his first term in office .
But they didn ’ t .
Instead , they covered up , made excuses for , overlooked , justified and condoned the very things that they screamed about when Obama was doing them—and the very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden be elected and he repeats them .
No !
I am not advocating for people to not vote for Donald Trump .
Voting is not our problem .
I am advocating for Christian people to snap out of their idolatrous worship of politics in general and of Republican presidents in particular .
I am advocating for Christians to return to the love of the truth of God ’ s Word .
I am advocating for Christians to start putting principle before party .
I am advocating for Christians to understand that until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Word , all of the Republican politicians in the world will not be able to solve our problems .
I am advocating for Christians to cast off their unbiblical support for the warmongering , antichrist State of Israel .
I am advocating for pastors to collect themselves and begin preaching with the courage and convictions of the prophets of old—the kind of preaching that created this country to begin with .
Remember the words of de Tocqueville : “ Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secret of her genius and power.
” If evangelicals were as excited about their pastors proclaiming truth as they are about their politicians pandering lies , we might see something besides an oncoming train at the end of the tunnel .
I repeat : America ’ s problems are not political .
And that means neither are the solutions .
P.S .
Once again , I am excited to distribute an amazing book about the creation of the State of Israel from an objective historical perspective , written by one of Israel ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is entitled The Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestine , by Ilan Pappe .
This is the true story of how Israel became a state off the blood , rape and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people .
The State of Israel loves to play the role of victim on the world stage , but the truth is , since WWII , Israel is one of the most murderous aggressor/terror states in the world .
Had any other nation on earth committed the atrocities you will find documented in this book , the entire world—especially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global condemnation .
But you have likely read or heard absolutely nothing about it .
The truth of Israel ’ s murderous conquest of Palestine is even hidden from the people of Israel themselves .
Evangelical Christians who are enamored with the modern State of Israel , believing it to be a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy , need to take a close , hard look at the brutal history of the Zionist state .
Reading this book is the best place to begin .
Order The Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestine by Ilan Pappe @ @

As readers should know by now, I adamantly refuse to get sucked into the phony left-right paradigm. I also refuse to get on board the Trump Train. I made a vow to God in 1996 that I would never again support a presidential candidate that I knew would be unfaithful to the Constitution and Natural liberties given us by our Creator.
As I see it, there are two basic groups of Christians who are voting for Donald Trump this year. 1) Those who have a god-like vision of Trump. They truly believe him to be some sort of a messiah-figure. They believe he is an American Moses. In many respects, Trump has a religious cult following. These people believe everything he says is gospel. They believe everything he does is by divine miracle. 2) Those who are good conservative, freedom-oriented believers, who recognize Trump’s wickedness, but who are willing to overlook those evils, believing, a) Trump is doing enough good things to tolerate those evils and, b) The alternative (Joe Biden) is so repugnant that there is no choice but to support Trump.
Sound familiar?
The first group is composed of seriously deluded people. The second group could be defined as political pragmatists. Of course, a host of non-believers, conservative in politics, would embrace the philosophy of political pragmatism. But so do many Christians. To them, a vote for the “lesser of two evils” is not a violation of their moral convictions. In fact, they would see such an act as necessary—and even righteous.
Obviously, the power-elite manipulate political pragmatists during every election cycle—especially at the national level. By stacking the deck in the general election with controlled candidates from both political parties, they ensure that no matter who wins, the establishment’s agenda moves forward unabated, while rank-and-file voters on both sides of the aisle believe they have voted for a difference. It is a masterful strategy.
I firmly believe that two things are required to see through the above. 1) A studied understanding that there IS a cabal of very powerful people who not only conspire against the Liberty principles of America and Christianity but who are also wealthy and influential enough to actually manipulate—and even control—the major levels of leadership within countries, including their news media, educational, entertainment, medical and religious institutions. 2) A spiritual understanding that America’s strength lies in the moral courage of its pulpits.
In other words, America’s problems are not political; they are spiritual.
The forces of evil have hated this country from its inception. From the beginning, America’s core principles—enshrined in our Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights—were rooted in our Creator’s Natural and Revealed Laws. Christian faith and practice are at the heart of America’s heritage.
The quote commonly attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville may have said it best:
I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her commodious harbors and her ample rivers, and it was not there. I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her fertile fields and boundless forests, and it was not there. I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her rich mines and her vast world commerce, and it was not there. I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her public school system and her institutions of learning, and it was not there. I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her democratic Congress and her matchless Constitution, and it was not there. Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because America is good, and if America ever ceases to be good America will cease to be great.
That’s it! Goodness precedes greatness. Likewise, evil precedes extinction.
As I brought out in my message last Sunday at Liberty Fellowship (taken from Micah 6:1 – 8), the national crises that Old Testament Israel and Judah faced were due to the way that God’s people—especially the kings and priests—throughout the two nations had offended God with their vile and wicked conduct.
This, my friends, is the crux of America’s problems.
But Jerry Falwell Jr. seemed to speak for most evangelicals when he said, “You don’t choose a president based on how good they are.” I guess not. But we used to.
There was a time in America when we expected our grocery clerks, our gas station attendants, our school teachers, our mailmen, our business managers, our repairmen, our physicians, our mechanics, our neighbors, and, yes, our civil magistrates, to be good. Does anyone remember Gary Hart? And he was a Democrat.
Today, not only are pastors and Christians willing to enthusiastically support an immoral reprobate like Donald Trump but they actually believe that this immoral reprobate is America’s only hope. He is America’s only answer. He is God’s salvation for our country.
Are we not able to stop and see what is happening?
To a vast number of evangelical Christians, America’s hope rests with politicians—their preferred politicians, of course. To these believers, politicians are far more important to the future of America than preachers. Acts of Congress are more important than Acts of God. Fidelity to a political party is more important than fidelity to Holy Scripture. Salvation comes in the form of Executive Order and Supreme Court decision, not Holy Spirit conviction and God’s immutable truth.
And in the case of Donald Trump, which came first: A corrupt president who is corrupting the Church or a corrupt Church that created a corrupt president?
Susan Wright tries to sort it out:
Others who deemed him [Trump] unfit and a danger to the soul of the nation in those prayer calls have laid their moral objections down at the altar of Trump, for the sake of partisanship. It is heartbreaking to see, and with the exception of a very few from those calls, it is a sickness of spirit that has apparently taken deep root. Is the evangelical church in America so lost? Is their faith only skin deep? Is there no remnant of faithful believers, ready to stand on God’s holy Word, above any temporal, worldly kingdom?
At this point let me plainly assert: Ever since Trump was elected in 2016, Christians have been saying that God put Him in office. If that’s true, then God is certainly able to keep Trump in office. But if Biden is elected next week, then it must mean that God wants Biden in office.
No matter who wins the election next Tuesday, America’s problems will not be solved, because, again, America’s problems are not political. And as long as evangelical Christians continue to put their faith and trust in politicians, our problems will only worsen.
God eventually destroyed Israel and Judah due to their wickedness. Why should He spare an unrepentant America? And that’s exactly what we have right now: An unrepentant nation and an unrepentant Church.
For example, I hear Christians constantly say the reason they vote for Donald Trump (or for any other Republican presidential nominee) is because he is “pro-life.” Really?
As I have pointed out several times: Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans controlled the entire federal government—including the Supreme Court—for the first two years of his administration. G.W. Bush and Republicans controlled the entire federal government for 4.6 years. Did either of them overturn Roe? No, they did not. They did not even try to overturn Roe. Please try telling the 3.5 million babies who were surgically aborted and the 56 million babies who were chemically aborted since Trump took office how “pro-life” he is.
And never forget that Republican-appointed judges have been a majority on the Supreme Court since before Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. That’s 50 consecutive years of a Republican-dominated Court. That’s right: A Republican-majority court gave us Roe, and 50 years of Republican-majority courts have kept Roe intact. Since when have we ever needed Democrats to legalize abortion-on-demand or keep it legal?
Our family physician, Dr. Annie Bukacek, gave an excellent presentation pointing out that, as much as anything, support for phony pro-life legislation has been a major impediment to reversing Roe v Wade.
Furthermore, under Trump’s presidency, more federal tax dollars have been given to Planned Parenthood than when Barack Obama was president. And speaking of federal spending, do we even dare to broach the subject of the national debt and deficit spending? No, because Trump has shattered all the records.
But here’s what evangelicals never want to talk about: Donald Trump has extended America’s foreign wars beyond that of Obama or GW Bush. Donald Trump drops a bomb somewhere in the world every 12 minutes. You read that right: Every 12 minutes.
Trump has dropped more bombs and missiles on Middle Eastern countries in a comparable period of time than any modern U.S. President. Presidents Bush, Obama and now Trump have dropped over 300,000 bombs and missiles on Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. Trump’s rate of bombing eclipses both Bush and Obama. Trump has dropped almost 200,000 bombs and missiles on Middle Eastern countries in just his first term of office—which surpasses the number of bombs and missiles dropped by Obama during his entire eight-year presidency and is two-thirds of all of the bombs dropped since 9/11.
Trump began his presidency in a flurry of war, but as the 2020 elections drew nearer, he again started acting like a peace candidate. But why do I even point that out? It matters to almost no one.
In addition, Trump has escalated the financial and military support for the warmongering Zionist State of Israel, which has murdered untold thousands of innocent Palestinians—both Christians and Muslims—throughout the Middle East.
I am weary—and I think most of the rest of the world is too—with hearing evangelicals talk about how pro-life they are while at the same time supporting the wanton mass killing of innocent people all over the world via America’s Zionist-controlled military-industrial complex.
Reading the Old Testament prophets, one will quickly observe that Israel’s perpetual shedding of innocent blood was one of God’s chief indictments against that nation—indictments that eventually led to the nation’s divine execution.
Why should America be an exception?
If the evangelical church would lose its misplaced infatuation with and unbiblical enthusiasm for the Zionist State of Israel and use its very powerful collective voice to call for an end to these wars for Israel and slaughter of innocent people, maybe—just maybe—God’s anger against us would be assuaged.
Trump talks a lot about ending America’s endless wars, but in reality, he’s done nothing about it. And the truth is, most evangelicals would be angry if he actually did end the wars for Israel. As Trump recently told us, the only reason we are fighting in the Middle East is to protect Israel (a nation that is fully capable of defending itself and who’s Arab neighbors—including Iran—pose NO serious threat to it). And much of the impetus for these unconstitutional and immoral wars for Israel is the pressure exerted on the White House and Congress by AIPAC and the rest of the Israeli lobby in Washington, D.C., including the vast majority of evangelical churches.
When Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, went to pray for her father’s re-election, she went to the grave of the Chabadist cult leader Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Yet, many evangelicals are salivating over the idea that Ivanka might be president in 2024. PLEASE! Doesn’t anyone see what has happened to the Church?
To understand the terroristic and aggressive history of Zionist Israel—a violent, bloodthirsty history meticulously planned for decades before being implemented—it is imperative that you read the book The Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestine by Ilan Pappe.
With all of this said, I am not advocating for people to not vote for Donald Trump. I have many friends (at least, I hope they are still friends) and family members who voted for Trump and will vote for him again. I wouldn’t even be upset with evangelicals who voted for Trump four years ago had they made a sincere effort to hold Trump accountable to the principles of constitutional government during his first term in office. But they didn’t. Instead, they covered up, made excuses for, overlooked, justified and condoned the very things that they screamed about when Obama was doing them—and the very things they will scream about again should Biden be elected and he repeats them.
No! I am not advocating for people to not vote for Donald Trump. Voting is not our problem.
I am advocating for Christian people to snap out of their idolatrous worship of politics in general and of Republican presidents in particular. I am advocating for Christians to return to the love of the truth of God’s Word. I am advocating for Christians to start putting principle before party. I am advocating for Christians to understand that until the Church gets right with God’s Word, all of the Republican politicians in the world will not be able to solve our problems. I am advocating for Christians to cast off their unbiblical support for the warmongering, antichrist State of Israel. I am advocating for pastors to collect themselves and begin preaching with the courage and convictions of the prophets of old—the kind of preaching that created this country to begin with.
Remember the words of de Tocqueville: “Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power.”
If evangelicals were as excited about their pastors proclaiming truth as they are about their politicians pandering lies, we might see something besides an oncoming train at the end of the tunnel.
I repeat: America’s problems are not political. And that means neither are the solutions.
P.S. Once again, I am excited to distribute an amazing book about the creation of the State of Israel from an objective historical perspective, written by one of Israel’s most renowned historians.
The book is entitled The Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestine , by Ilan Pappe.
This is the true story of how Israel became a state off the blood, rape and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.
The State of Israel loves to play the role of victim on the world stage, but the truth is, since WWII, Israel is one of the most murderous aggressor/terror states in the world. Had any other nation on earth committed the atrocities you will find documented in this book, the entire world—especially the United States—would hold it up to global condemnation. But you have likely read or heard absolutely nothing about it. The truth of Israel’s murderous conquest of Palestine is even hidden from the people of Israel themselves.
Evangelical Christians who are enamored with the modern State of Israel, believing it to be a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, need to take a close, hard look at the brutal history of the Zionist state. Reading this book is the best place to begin.
Order The Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestine by Ilan Pappe here.
Article posted with permission from Chuck Baldwin


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-30--Businesses Boarding Up Windows & Pulling Guns Off Shelves Ahead Of Anticipated Widespread Election U

Businesses Boarding Up Windows & Pulling Guns Off Shelves Ahead Of Anticipated Widespread Election Unrest

A storm is coming in , and soon it will envelop the entire nation .
We are accustomed to seeing businesses board up their doors and windows in coastal cities that are about to get hit by a hurricane , but I can ’ t think of another time when businesses all across America have been boarding up their doors and windows all at the same time .
There is widespread fear that this election could be the spark that sets off another round of horrifying civil unrest in cities all over the United States , and business owners are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the violence .
The fact that we are even talking about the possibility of widespread violence after a presidential election shows just how much our country has fallen already .
Our society is literally coming apart at the seams all around us , and at this point , even Forbes is urging everyone to prepare for a worst case scenario… That paragraph was not pulled from some ridiculous tabloid .
This is Forbes that we are talking about , and it is crazy that even they are warning that there could be “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and unrest after the election ” .
How in the world is it possible that we have sunk so low ?
Violence is not going to solve anything .
It boggles my mind that so many Americans would be willing to engage in senseless violence , and we should all be grieved by what has been happening in the streets of Philadelphia over the past few nights .
Many desperate business owners are extremely concerned that their businesses could be vandalized and looted in the aftermath of the upcoming election , and they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ try to prevent that from happening .
For example , here is what has been happening in downtown Washington… And at this point , large portions of downtown Chicago are boarded up as well… If I owned a business in a core urban area , I would undoubtedly be doing the exact same thing .
When things get crazy , the looters are going to follow the path of least resistance , and they are going to prey on easy targets .
Just look at what looters just did to a Walmart in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you to the core .
On Thursday , we learned that Walmart has decided to pull all guns and ammunition from the sales floors of all their stores nationwide due to concerns that the upcoming election could spark even more civil unrest… There is still a small chance that there could be some sort of a landslide that would bring a quick end to the presidential race , but that does not seem likely .
Instead , it appears that the election results could be bitterly contested , and law enforcement authorities in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For instance , Texas Governor Greg Abbott has announced that he will be deploying National Guard troops to cities all over Texas prior to Election Day… I wish that more governors were taking similar steps , but a lot of politicians in blue states don ’ t seem particularly eager to crack down on rioters , and that is extremely unfortunate .
Because the truth is that most Americans can see what is coming and they are extremely concerned about what may happen .
According to one recent survey , three out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about possible violence ” … Personally , I am still hoping that a way can be found to minimize the unrest and that we can get through this election with as little violence as possible .
But sticking our heads in the sand isn ’ t going to do any good .
There have been endless riots since the tragic death of George Floyd earlier this year , and this election has the potential to spark chaos that is unlike anything that we have seen so far .
Hopefully , the votes will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vast majority of Americans will be willing to peacefully accept the results .
But the closer that we get to Election Day the less likely that outcome appears to be , and at this point , many of us are bracing for the worst .

A storm is coming in, and soon it will envelop the entire nation. We are accustomed to seeing businesses board up their doors and windows in coastal cities that are about to get hit by a hurricane, but I can’t think of another time when businesses all across America have been boarding up their doors and windows all at the same time. There is widespread fear that this election could be the spark that sets off another round of horrifying civil unrest in cities all over the United States, and business owners are taking measures to protect their businesses from the violence. The fact that we are even talking about the possibility of widespread violence after a presidential election shows just how much our country has fallen already. Our society is literally coming apart at the seams all around us, and at this point, even Forbes is urging everyone to prepare for a worst case scenario…
If we don’t have a clear winner, things could get ugly. Since we’ve witnessed months of mayhem, riots and civil unrest in large U.S. cities, it’s reasonable to conclude that we’ll have a frightening level of violence, destruction and unrest after the election. Both sides may claim victory, which could lead to actions that we don’t want to even consider, as it would rip apart the country.
That paragraph was not pulled from some ridiculous tabloid. This is Forbes that we are talking about, and it is crazy that even they are warning that there could be “a frightening level of violence, destruction and unrest after the election”.
How in the world is it possible that we have sunk so low?
Violence is not going to solve anything. It boggles my mind that so many Americans would be willing to engage in senseless violence, and we should all be grieved by what has been happening in the streets of Philadelphia over the past few nights.
Many desperate business owners are extremely concerned that their businesses could be vandalized and looted in the aftermath of the upcoming election, and they have been boarding up their storefronts to try to prevent that from happening. For example, here is what has been happening in downtown Washington…
Large swaths of downtown Washington, within blocks of the White House, resembled a coastal community girding for a powerful hurricane. Hotels, office buildings, coffee shops and restaurants were sheathed in plywood, with some of the makeshift barriers stretching nearly entire blocks.
And at this point, large portions of downtown Chicago are boarded up as well…
Restaurants and luxury retailers are operating through windows covered in plywood or other barriers, and shoppers pass through entryway cut-outs. City officials have been holding workshops in recent months to prepare for possible civil unrest after Election Day.
If I owned a business in a core urban area, I would undoubtedly be doing the exact same thing.
When things get crazy, the looters are going to follow the path of least resistance, and they are going to prey on easy targets.
Just look at what looters just did to a Walmart in Philadelphia. Watching that footage should chill you to the core.
On Thursday, we learned that Walmart has decided to pull all guns and ammunition from the sales floors of all their stores nationwide due to concerns that the upcoming election could spark even more civil unrest…
“We have seen some isolated civil unrest and as we have done on several occasions over the last few years, we have moved our firearms and ammunition off the sales floor as a precaution,” Walmart said in a statement.
There is still a small chance that there could be some sort of a landslide that would bring a quick end to the presidential race, but that does not seem likely.
Instead, it appears that the election results could be bitterly contested, and law enforcement authorities in some states are preparing for the worst.
For instance, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has announced that he will be deploying National Guard troops to cities all over Texas prior to Election Day…
In Texas, National Guard troops are expected to be sent to Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio before Election Day. During a Wednesday news conference, Texas Governor Greg Abbott said during a Wednesday event that the Texas National Guard were being deployed “in the event that there are any protests after the elections are concluded, that we will have adequate personnel in place to make sure that we will be able to address any protest that could turn into riots.” Abbott declined to reveal the number of troops being sent throughout the state.
I wish that more governors were taking similar steps, but a lot of politicians in blue states don’t seem particularly eager to crack down on rioters, and that is extremely unfortunate.
Because the truth is that most Americans can see what is coming and they are extremely concerned about what may happen. According to one recent survey, three out of every four voters is “worried about possible violence”…
Across the country, Americans are increasingly worried about the possibility of violence over the high-stakes presidential election, which analysts say could be marred in chaos as an anxious country waits days or weeks for the results. Three of 4 voters say they’re worried about possible violence, while only 1 in 4 say they’re “very confident” the country will see a peaceful transfer of power if Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden defeats President Donald Trump, a new USA TODAY/Suffolk University poll finds.
Personally, I am still hoping that a way can be found to minimize the unrest and that we can get through this election with as little violence as possible.
But sticking our heads in the sand isn’t going to do any good. There have been endless riots since the tragic death of George Floyd earlier this year, and this election has the potential to spark chaos that is unlike anything that we have seen so far.
Hopefully, it won’t happen.
Hopefully, the votes will be counted as quickly as possible and the vast majority of Americans will be willing to peacefully accept the results.
But the closer that we get to Election Day the less likely that outcome appears to be, and at this point, many of us are bracing for the worst.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-30--“A Swamp Protection Racket”:  Reporter Points Out FBI Director Christopher Wray Profited From Biden/

“ A Swamp Protection Racket ” : Reporter Points Out FBI Director Christopher Wray Profited From Biden/Russia/China Deal & So Did AG William Barr President Donald Trump is not draining the swamp .
He ’ s propping it up , and the evidence coming out now suggests both his picks for FBI Director and Attorney General cashed in on the Hunter/Joe Biden Russia/China deal that ’ s been uncovered .
Trump nominated Christopher Wray to head the FBI after firing James Comey .
Trump also picked swamp creature Bill Barr to head the DOJ following his release of Jeff Sessions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrate that Trump has not kept his promise to drain the swamp , but continually propped it up with his appointments in the government .
These are just two examples .
There are a number of them .
However , while people are wondering why the FBI had Hunter Biden ’ s laptop for more than a year and a half before it all started coming out just weeks before the election , one should consider that this has all been planned .
On Friday ’ s Paine in the Morning , Mike @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covered up the laptop information for so long .
Moore references the Tony Bobulinski interview on Tucker Carlson and then goes into the details of Wray and Barr ’ s involvement in the Hunter Biden deal .
Here ’ s podcast 25 mentioned in the podcast above .
Trump claims he ’ ll fire Wray if he wins re-election .
Why not now ?
Isn ’ t he still president for a few more months ?
Yes , he is !
He ’ s enabling the corruption by leaving him in place .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Liberty Media

“A Swamp Protection Racket”: Reporter Points Out FBI Director Christopher Wray Profited From Biden/Russia/China Deal & So Did AG William Barr
President Donald Trump is not draining the swamp. He’s propping it up, and the evidence coming out now suggests both his picks for FBI Director and Attorney General cashed in on the Hunter/Joe Biden Russia/China deal that’s been uncovered.
Trump nominated Christopher Wray to head the FBI after firing James Comey.
Trump also picked swamp creature Bill Barr to head the DOJ following his release of Jeff Sessions.
I provide these media clips to demonstrate that Trump has not kept his promise to drain the swamp, but continually propped it up with his appointments in the government. These are just two examples. There are a number of them.
However, while people are wondering why the FBI had Hunter Biden’s laptop for more than a year and a half before it all started coming out just weeks before the election, one should consider that this has all been planned.
On Friday’s Paine in the Morning, Mike Moore exposes the reason why the FBI covered up the laptop information for so long.
FBI Dir. Wray Profited from Hunter Biden’s Illegal China/Russia Kickback Deal, per Records & High-Placed Feds. Is This Why the FBI Has Covered Up Hunter’s Laptop? Guess Who Else Cashed In on Hunter’s Deal? AG William Barr. A SWAMP PROTECTION RACKET.
Moore references the Tony Bobulinski interview on Tucker Carlson and then goes into the details of Wray and Barr’s involvement in the Hunter Biden deal.
Take a listen (WARNING: Some language)
Here’s podcast 25 mentioned in the podcast above.
Trump claims he’ll fire Wray if he wins re-election. Why not now? Isn’t he still president for a few more months? Yes, he is! He’s enabling the corruption by leaving him in place.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-30--An Actual Constitutionalist Running For US Senate Against Republicans & Democrats

Ever wonder why you don ’ t hear about those with a different message than the same old R & D ?
It ’ s because , for the most part , people have succumbed to the spirit our forefathers warned us about when it comes to a two-party system .
Joining me in this episode is Kevin Hayes .
He ’ s a candidate for the US Senate from North Carolina and is running under the Constitution Party , a party that actually holds its members to the Constitution .
Born and raised in Eastern North Carolina , Kevin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Having ran his own small computer repair business Kevin understands the needs of small business owners .
Kevin also has over 15 years ’ experience in the IT industry working in corporate , financial , education and retail .
Kevin has many years of experience in the political realm .
Kevin has worked on Congressional , US Senate , Governor and 3 Presidential campaigns .
Kevin ran for NC House in 2012 and 2018 Kevin helped organize and get the Constitution Party on the ballot in North Carolina by both petitioning and by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the requirements to get a new party on the ballot .
Kevin has been the Vice Chairman of the Constitution Party for over 4 years .
Check out Kevin ’ s website by clicking here .
Also , check out the Constitution Party of North Carolina ’ s website by clicking here .
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to his `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

Ever wonder why you don’t hear about those with a different message than the same old R & D? It’s because, for the most part, people have succumbed to the spirit our forefathers warned us about when it comes to a two-party system. Joining me in this episode is Kevin Hayes. He’s a candidate for the US Senate from North Carolina and is running under the Constitution Party, a party that actually holds its members to the Constitution.
About Kevin Hayes:
Born and raised in Eastern North Carolina, Kevin understands the needs of North Carolinians.
Having ran his own small computer repair business Kevin understands the needs of small business owners. Kevin also has over 15 years’ experience in the IT industry working in corporate, financial, education and retail.
Kevin has many years of experience in the political realm. Kevin has worked on Congressional, US Senate, Governor and 3 Presidential campaigns.
Kevin ran for NC House in 2012 and 2018
Kevin helped organize and get the Constitution Party on the ballot in North Carolina by both petitioning and by helping get the law changed which eased the requirements to get a new party on the ballot.
Kevin has been the Vice Chairman of the Constitution Party for over 4 years.
Previous interviews with Constitution Party candidates.
Al Pisano – NC Governor
Don Blankenship – President
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-30--Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter:  Missing & Unproven Viruses Is Nothing New

Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport is hammering the mainstream media ’ s narrative about the alleged novel coronavirus and COVID-19 .
In his latest post , Rappoport exposes how throughout the 20th century , diseases and viruses were claimed by health officials , but couldn ’ t actually find them .
So , the fact that the CDC ’ s own report which indicated they don ’ t have the current coronavirus that allegedly produces COVID-19 should indicate the deception that Big Pharma and those running point man for them are lying through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ No Quantified Virus Isolates Of The 2019-nCoV are Currently Available ” • Former CBSHealthwatch Reporter : “ ‘ The Virus ’ Is One Of The Greatest Frauds In Modern History ” • Former CBS HealthWatch Reporter Exposes 16 Step Pattern For How COVID-19 Illusion Is Built • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : In The Political Battle Over A COVID Vaccine , Your Health Is Of No Concern • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : How CDC/WHO Will Fake Effects Of COVID Vaccine To Make It Look Like A Success As I keep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has not been proven to exist , I ’ m also making this point : There is no honest and prolonged mainstream debate on this issue , and there has to be .
Reputable journals should be opening up their pages to such a debate from all comers , and they aren ’ t .
They ’ re ignoring , side-stepping , and suppressing a debate .
This is not science .
It ’ s not even a shadow of science .
And the COVID virus is not the first time the issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people understood that , they wouldn ’ t be so shocked .
Here are several cases from recent history : In the early part of the 20th century , a very nasty skin disease called pellagra took hold in the American South , affecting several million people .
The elite medical view , of course : a germ was the cause .
But no one could find it in the ensuing decades .
Finally , a small group of independent researchers , relentlessly pursuing a different course , convinced the establishment that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In the 1960s and 70s , Japan experienced a strange nervous-system affliction labeled SMON .
Again the clarion call was : find the virus , it must be a virus .
But no , in a landmark court case , the cause was shown to be a gastrointestinal drug , clioquinol , manufactured by Ciba-Geigy .
The company apologized and paid out damages .
Since then , some research has suggested that clioquinol fails to explain all the SMON cases .
SARS , 2003 .
During the height of hysteria in Canada about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Frank Plummer , wandered off the reservation and told the press that fewer and fewer SARS patients showed any sign of having the virus—in fact , the percentage was shrinking to zero .
Therefore : what virus ?
Swine Flu , 2009 .
As I detailed in a recent article , CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson uncovered the fact that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases , because the overwhelming percentage of patients ’ samples coming back from testing labs showed no sign of the Swine Flu virus or any other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the cause of AIDS in 1984 , has been challenged by a number of independent researchers .
I have published Christine Johnson ’ s explosive and detailed interview with Eleni Papadopulos , “ a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia.
” The subject ?
Does HIV exist ?
I ’ m reprinting my article and the Papadopulos interview below .
There are other illnesses in which the existence of the virus has been challenged : for example , polio and the Swine Flu of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should also be aware there are analogous “ missing causes ” within the medical framework .
The most egregious example is certainly psychiatry .
Following the breakthrough work of psychiatrist Peter Breggin , I ’ ve written extensively on this subject .
In a nutshell , there are NO defining lab tests for ANY of the 300 so-called mental disorders .
Every one of these disorders is arbitrarily assembled by committees of psychiatrists , from menus of behaviors .
This is about as far from science as you can get .
Is there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this stunning situation in the psychiatric literature ?
Absolutely not .
Here is my article , Does HIV Exist ?
Buckle up : Before we get to Christine Johnson ’ s interview , a bit of background .
My first book , AIDS INC. , was published in 1988 .
The research I engaged in then formed a foundation for my recent work in exposing the vast fraud called COVID-19 .
In 1987-88 , my main question eventually became : does HIV cause AIDS ?
For months , I had blithely assumed the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ havoc in my investigation , because I was facing contradictions I couldn ’ t solve .
For example , in parts of Africa , people who were chronically ill and dying obviously needed no push from a new virus .
All their “ AIDS ” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment : contaminated water supplies ; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water ; protein-calorie malnutrition ; hunger , starvation ; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs ; toxic pesticides ; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes .
Finally , in the summer of 1987 , I found several researchers who were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS .
Their reports were persuasive .
I ’ m shortcutting a great deal of my 1987-8 investigation here , but once HIV was out of the picture for me , many pieces fell into place .
I discovered that , in EVERY group supposedly at “ high-risk ” for AIDS , their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus .
AIDS was not one condition .
It was an umbrella label , used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive conditions and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “ pandemic.
” Several years after the publication of AIDS INC. , I became aware of a quite different emerging debate going on under the surface of research : DOES HIV EXIST ?
Was the purported virus ever truly discovered ?
And THAT question led to : what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus ?
The following @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalist , Christine Johnson , delves into these questions : How should researchers prove that a particular virus exists ?
How should they isolate it ?
What are the correct steps ?
These questions , and their answers , reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet , overwhelmingly , doctors never explore them or even consider them .
Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos , “ a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia .
Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HIV/AIDS hypothesis… ” Here I ’ m publishing and highlighting excerpts from the interview .
Technical issues are discussed .
Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you ’ ve ever done , but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials .
Eleni Papadopulos : There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS .
EP : For many reasons , but most importantly , because there is no proof that HIV exists .
… CJ : Didn ’ t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [ purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eighties ?
EP : No .
In the papers published in Science by those two research groups , there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients .
[ HIV is said to be a retrovirus . ]
CJ : They say they did isolate a virus .
EP : Our interpretation of the data differs .
To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things .
First , culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus .
Obviously , at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look like a virus .
Second , you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up .
Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself .
In other words , that it can replicate .
CJ : Can ’ t you just look down a microscope and say there ’ s a virus in the cultures ?
EP : No , you can ’ t .
Not all particles that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CJ : My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density , a so-called “ density-purified sample.
” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus , in terms of size , shape , and so forth .
If all this is true , then you are three steps into the procedure for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) You have an isolate , and the isolate consists of objects with the same ( 2 ) density and ( 3 ) appearance of a retrovirus .
Then you have to examine this isolate further , to see if the objects in it contain reverse transcriptase [ an enzyme ] and will replicate when placed in new cultures .
Only then can you rightfully declare that you have obtained a retroviral isolate .
EP : Exactly .
It was discovered that retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That property is their buoyancy , or density , and this was utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation .
The technology is complicated , but the concept is extremely simple .
You prepare a test tube containing a solution of sucrose , ordinary table sugar , made so the solution is light at the top but gradually becomes heavier , or more dense , towards the bottom .
Meanwhile , you grow whatever cells you think may contain your retrovirus .
If you ’ re right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cells and pass into the culture fluids .
When you think everything is ready , you decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of the sugar solution .
Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds .
This generates tremendous forces , and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further .
In other words , they drift down the density gradient until they reach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same as that region of the sugar solution .
When they get there they stop , all together .
To use virological jargon , that ’ s where they band .
Retroviruses band at a characteristic point .
In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml .
That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope .
The picture is called an electron micrograph , or EM .
The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CJ : So , examination with the electron microscope tells you what fish you ’ ve caught ?
EP : Not only that .
It ’ s the only way to know if you ’ ve caught a fish .
Or anything at all .
CJ : Did Montagnier and Gallo do this ?
EP : This is one of the many problems .
Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding , but for some unknown reason they did not publish any Ems [ photos ] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists , some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts .
At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed , and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential .
CJ : But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles .
EP : No .
Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged , or even separated from the culture cells , for that matter .
These EMs contained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses , a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses , and which all belonged to the same retroviral species , now called HIV .
But photographs of unpurified particles don ’ t prove that those particles are viruses .
The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting .
CJ : And what was that method ?
EP : All the steps I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific method that exists .
Culture cells , find a particle , isolate the particle , take it to pieces , find out what ’ s inside , and then prove those particles are able to make more of the same with the same constituents when they ’ re added to a culture of uninfected cells .
CJ : So before AIDS came along there was a well-tried method for proving the existence of a retrovirus , but Montagnier and Gallo did not follow this method ?
EP : They used some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undertake every step including proving what particles , if any , are in the 1.16 gm/ml band of the density gradient , the density that defines retroviral particles .
CJ : But what about their pictures ?
EP : Montagnier ’ s and Gallo ’ s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures , or of unpurified fluids from cultures… ” If you grasp the essentials of this discussion , you ’ ll see there is every reason to doubt the existence of HIV , because the methods for proving its existence were not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported these past few months , there is every reason to doubt and reject the existence of the COVID virus , since correct large-scale electron microscope studies have never been done .
I kept the Christine Johnson interview , and other similar information , in mind when , for example , I explored the dud epidemics called SARS and 2009 Swine Flu .
How many viruses have been named as causes of disease , when in fact those viruses have never been isolated or proved to exist ?
Of course , conventional-consensus researchers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to raise these issues .
For them , “ the science is settled.
” Meaning : they don ’ t want to think .
They don ’ t want to stir the waters .
After 30 years working as a reporter in the area of deep medical-research fraud , I ’ ve seen that false science occurs in levels .
The deeper you go , the stranger it gets .
To put it another way : the deeper you go , the worse it gets .
Indeed !
And we ’ re only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goes much , much deeper and there are a lot of deep pockets invested in the hoax being perpetrated on the world .

Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport is hammering the mainstream media’s narrative about the alleged novel coronavirus and COVID-19. In his latest post, Rappoport exposes how throughout the 20th century, diseases and viruses were claimed by health officials, but couldn’t actually find them. So, the fact that the CDC’s own report which indicated they don’t have the current coronavirus that allegedly produces COVID-19 should indicate the deception that Big Pharma and those running point man for them are lying through their collective teeth.
Rappoport reports:
As I keep making the case that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been proven to exist, I’m also making this point:
There is no honest and prolonged mainstream debate on this issue, and there has to be. Reputable journals should be opening up their pages to such a debate from all comers, and they aren’t. They’re ignoring, side-stepping, and suppressing a debate. This is not science. It’s not even a shadow of science.
And the COVID virus is not the first time the issue of existence has arisen. If more people understood that, they wouldn’t be so shocked.
Here are several cases from recent history:
In the early part of the 20th century, a very nasty skin disease called pellagra took hold in the American South, affecting several million people.
The elite medical view, of course: a germ was the cause. But no one could find it in the ensuing decades. Finally, a small group of independent researchers, relentlessly pursuing a different course, convinced the establishment that the true cause was a niacin deficiency.
In the 1960s and 70s, Japan experienced a strange nervous-system affliction labeled SMON. Again the clarion call was: find the virus, it must be a virus. But no, in a landmark court case, the cause was shown to be a gastrointestinal drug, clioquinol, manufactured by Ciba-Geigy. The company apologized and paid out damages. Since then, some research has suggested that clioquinol fails to explain all the SMON cases.
SARS, 2003. During the height of hysteria in Canada about this flu-like illness, famous WHO researcher, Frank Plummer, wandered off the reservation and told the press that fewer and fewer SARS patients showed any sign of having the virus—in fact, the percentage was shrinking to zero. Therefore: what virus?
Swine Flu, 2009. As I detailed in a recent article, CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson uncovered the fact that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases, because the overwhelming percentage of patients’ samples coming back from testing labs showed no sign of the Swine Flu virus or any other flu virus.
HIV, first announced as the cause of AIDS in 1984, has been challenged by a number of independent researchers. I have published Christine Johnson’s explosive and detailed interview with Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia.” The subject? Does HIV exist? I’m reprinting my article and the Papadopulos interview below.
There are other illnesses in which the existence of the virus has been challenged: for example, polio and the Swine Flu of the 1970s.
Mainstream and independent investigators should also be aware there are analogous “missing causes” within the medical framework. The most egregious example is certainly psychiatry.
Following the breakthrough work of psychiatrist Peter Breggin, I’ve written extensively on this subject. In a nutshell, there are NO defining lab tests for ANY of the 300 so-called mental disorders. Every one of these disorders is arbitrarily assembled by committees of psychiatrists, from menus of behaviors. This is about as far from science as you can get.
Is there an open and honest prolonged debate about this stunning situation in the psychiatric literature? Absolutely not.
Here is my article, Does HIV Exist? Buckle up:
Before we get to Christine Johnson’s interview, a bit of background.
My first book, AIDS INC., was published in 1988. The research I engaged in then formed a foundation for my recent work in exposing the vast fraud called COVID-19.
In 1987-88, my main question eventually became: does HIV cause AIDS? For months, I had blithely assumed the obvious answer was yes. This created havoc in my investigation, because I was facing contradictions I couldn’t solve.
For example, in parts of Africa, people who were chronically ill and dying obviously needed no push from a new virus. All their “AIDS” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment: contaminated water supplies; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water; protein-calorie malnutrition; hunger, starvation; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs; toxic pesticides; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments; wars; extreme poverty. The virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes.
Finally, in the summer of 1987, I found several researchers who were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS. Their reports were persuasive.
I’m shortcutting a great deal of my 1987-8 investigation here, but once HIV was out of the picture for me, many pieces fell into place. I discovered that, in EVERY group supposedly at “high-risk” for AIDS, their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that had nothing to do with a new virus.
AIDS was not one condition. It was an umbrella label, used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive conditions and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “pandemic.”
Several years after the publication of AIDS INC., I became aware of a quite different emerging debate going on under the surface of research: DOES HIV EXIST?
Was the purported virus ever truly discovered?
And THAT question led to: what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus?
The following 1997 interview, conducted by brilliant freelance journalist, Christine Johnson, delves into these questions:
How should researchers prove that a particular virus exists? How should they isolate it? What are the correct steps?
These questions, and their answers, reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet, overwhelmingly, doctors never explore them or even consider them.
Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…”
Here I’m publishing and highlighting excerpts from the interview. Technical issues are discussed. Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you’ve ever done, but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials.
Christine Johnson: Does HIV cause AIDS?
Eleni Papadopulos: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.
CJ: Why not?
EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists.
… CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?
EP: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients. [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]
CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.
EP: Our interpretation of the data differs. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate.
CJ: Can’t you just look down a microscope and say there’s a virus in the cultures?
EP: No, you can’t. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.
… CJ: My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density, a so-called “density-purified sample.” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus, in terms of size, shape, and so forth. If all this is true, then you are three steps into the procedure for obtaining a retroviral isolate. (1) You have an isolate, and the isolate consists of objects with the same (2) density and (3) appearance of a retrovirus. Then you have to examine this isolate further, to see if the objects in it contain reverse transcriptase [an enzyme] and will replicate when placed in new cultures. Only then can you rightfully declare that you have obtained a retroviral isolate.
EP: Exactly. It was discovered that retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be separated from other material in cell cultures. That property is their buoyancy, or density, and this was utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation.
The technology is complicated, but the concept is extremely simple. You prepare a test tube containing a solution of sucrose, ordinary table sugar, made so the solution is light at the top but gradually becomes heavier, or more dense, towards the bottom. Meanwhile, you grow whatever cells you think may contain your retrovirus. If you’re right, retroviral particles will be released from the cells and pass into the culture fluids. When you think everything is ready, you decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of the sugar solution. Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds. This generates tremendous forces, and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further. In other words, they drift down the density gradient until they reach a spot where their own density is the same as that region of the sugar solution. When they get there they stop, all together. To use virological jargon, that’s where they band. Retroviruses band at a characteristic point. In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml.
That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope. The picture is called an electron micrograph, or EM. The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen, and to be characterized by their appearance.
CJ: So, examination with the electron microscope tells you what fish you’ve caught?
EP: Not only that. It’s the only way to know if you’ve caught a fish. Or anything at all.
CJ: Did Montagnier and Gallo do this?
EP: This is one of the many problems. Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding, but for some unknown reason they did not publish any Ems [photos] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this is quite puzzling because in 1973 the Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists, some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts. At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed, and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential.
CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.
EP: No. Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter. These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV. But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses. The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.
CJ: And what was that method?
EP: All the steps I have just told you. The only scientific method that exists. Culture cells, find a particle, isolate the particle, take it to pieces, find out what’s inside, and then prove those particles are able to make more of the same with the same constituents when they’re added to a culture of uninfected cells.
CJ: So before AIDS came along there was a well-tried method for proving the existence of a retrovirus, but Montagnier and Gallo did not follow this method?
EP: They used some of the techniques, but they did not undertake every step including proving what particles, if any, are in the 1.16 gm/ml band of the density gradient, the density that defines retroviral particles.
CJ: But what about their pictures?
EP: Montagnier’s and Gallo’s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures, or of unpurified fluids from cultures…”
—end of interview excerpt—
If you grasp the essentials of this discussion, you’ll see there is every reason to doubt the existence of HIV, because the methods for proving its existence were not followed.
And so…as I’ve reported these past few months, there is every reason to doubt and reject the existence of the COVID virus, since correct large-scale electron microscope studies have never been done.
I kept the Christine Johnson interview, and other similar information, in mind when, for example, I explored the dud epidemics called SARS and 2009 Swine Flu.
How many viruses have been named as causes of disease, when in fact those viruses have never been isolated or proved to exist?
Of course, conventional-consensus researchers and doctors will scoff at any attempt to raise these issues. For them, “the science is settled.” Meaning: they don’t want to think. They don’t want to stir the waters.
After 30 years working as a reporter in the area of deep medical-research fraud, I’ve seen that false science occurs in levels.
The deeper you go, the stranger it gets. To put it another way: the deeper you go, the worse it gets.
Indeed! And we’re only cracking just below the surface. This goes much, much deeper and there are a lot of deep pockets invested in the hoax being perpetrated on the world.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-30--Why Aren’t Media Reporting? Biden & His Associates Are Under ACTIVE CRIMINAL FBI INVESTIGATION since

Why Aren’t Media Reporting? Biden & His Associates Are Under ACTIVE CRIMINAL FBI INVESTIGATION since 2019

A DOJ official just confirmed that in 2019 the FBI opened an investigation into Hunter Biden over allegations of money-laundering .
It is still open to this day .
Daybreak Insider : And it is ongoing ( Sinclair ) .
From Charlie Kirk : The FBI was investigating Hunter Biden ’ s overseas business deals in December 2019 while Donald Trump was being impeached for simply questioning those same deals .
Why are we just learning about their investigation now ?
( Twitter ) .
From James Rosen : Tony Bobulinski tells @ WeAreSinclair he was questioned by six @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for five hours on October 23 , listing him as a “ material witness ” in an ongoing investigation focused on Hunter Biden and his associates .
His cell phones were examined ( Twitter ) .
From Guy Benson : I ’ ve never been hot on this story , but DOJ confirms existence of investigation .
Bobulinski has documentary evidence .
Biden campaign won ’ t deny his specific accusations or authenticity of evidence .
How can this be summarily ignored & dismissed as a “ smear ” from “ Russia ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Harsanyi : Anyone who watched Tony Bobulinski ’ s interview on Tucker Carlson ’ s show this week — apparently it pulled over 5 million viewers — was confronted with a seemingly credible character .
Bobulinski says he met with Joe Biden in 2017 , and that the former vice president was intimately involved in the family business .
Maybe someone will ask the candidate about this .
Because Biden , widely seen as the frontrunner , has on numerous occasions emphatically denied any knowledge of what Hunter was doing .
So even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his son ’ s leveraging of the family name to strike deals with Chinese Communist energy interests , it is still newsworthy ( Twitter ) .
One of the founders of The Intercept resigned after the paper refused to publish his article critical of Biden on this issue ( Greenwald ) .
More on Greenwald ( Red State ) .
NBC News jumped on a conspiracy story nobody ever heard of treating it as if it were the story the media has been ignoring ( Twitter ) .
From Kimberly Strassel : I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ document , nor have i read anything quoting it .
I can also say it therefore bears zero relevance on the legitimate evidence about Hunter Biden ’ s biz , via laptop and Bobulinski ( Twitter ) .
Hunter Biden ’ s ex-business partner says Joe DID know about son ’ s deal with Chinese energy firm and IS ‘ the big guy ’ in email set to get 10 % cut of the deal DOJ official confirms FBI 2019 criminal investigation into Hunter Biden , still active Tony Bobulinksi was thrust into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the final presidential debate .
Bobulinksi discussed why he feels if elected , Biden would be compromised by the Chinese government and much more in an exclusive interview with Rosen .
The compromise they have is that in documents that have been well provided to the Senate , to Congress , to the Department of Justice via the FBI that CEFC was effectively loaning money directly to the Biden family .
Bobulinksi said he was first introduced to the former vice president in May 2017 by Hunter and Jim Biden in Beverly Hills @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the Biden family business plans with China , despite the Democratic nominee on several occasions denying he had any involvement , including the final presidential debate when Biden said , “ I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life.
” During his remarks that same night , Bobulinksi displayed three phones he claimed contained evidence against the Bidens that would be turned over to the FBI .
Less than a week later , Bobulisnki was interviewed by members of the FBI for several hours , where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of evidence found on the phones .
My impression was everyone in that room was aware of the sensitivity of the parties involved and potential multiple impacts to this country and every citizen living in it .
A veteran of the United States Navy , Bobulinksi held a top-secret security clearance for several years .
When asked if China may be in possession of any potential evidence that could help shed light on these claims , Bobulisnki said the country might have information on the Biden ’ s business dealings across the entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the extent that the Chinese communist party has information on the Biden family and their business dealings .
Other business dealings that occurred in Romania , Khazakstan , Georgia , Monaco and the Middle East , and then obviously topping off in Russia .
Bobulinksi said he decided to speak out publicly when he heard Rep. Adam Schiff , D-Calif. , and other Democrats who suggested these allegations were part of a Russian disinformation campaign .
Before that , Bobulinksi noted it was the impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump that was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his information and provide it to the authorities .
“ I didn ’ t want to put my face out there , I didn ’ t want to put my family at risk .
I now have ex-Navy SEALs guarding my family and my extended family and I have now put myself in huge risk for the sake of the American people .
”

A DOJ official just confirmed that in 2019 the FBI opened an investigation into Hunter Biden over allegations of money-laundering. It is still open to this day.
Daybreak Insider: And it is ongoing (Sinclair). From Charlie Kirk: The FBI was investigating Hunter Biden’s overseas business deals in December 2019 while Donald Trump was being impeached for simply questioning those same deals. Why are we just learning about their investigation now? (Twitter). From James Rosen: Tony Bobulinski tells @WeAreSinclair he was questioned by six @FBI agents, with counsel present, for five hours on October 23, listing him as a “material witness” in an ongoing investigation focused on Hunter Biden and his associates. His cell phones were examined (Twitter). From Guy Benson: I’ve never been hot on this story, but DOJ confirms existence of investigation. Bobulinski has documentary evidence. Biden campaign won’t deny his specific accusations or authenticity of evidence. How can this be summarily ignored & dismissed as a “smear” from “Russia”? (Twitter). From David Harsanyi: Anyone who watched Tony Bobulinski’s interview on Tucker Carlson’s show this week — apparently it pulled over 5 million viewers — was confronted with a seemingly credible character. Bobulinski says he met with Joe Biden in 2017, and that the former vice president was intimately involved in the family business. Maybe someone will ask the candidate about this. Because Biden, widely seen as the frontrunner, has on numerous occasions emphatically denied any knowledge of what Hunter was doing. So even if he didn’t benefit from his son’s leveraging of the family name to strike deals with Chinese Communist energy interests, it is still newsworthy (Twitter). One of the founders of The Intercept resigned after the paper refused to publish his article critical of Biden on this issue (Greenwald). More on Greenwald (Red State). NBC News jumped on a conspiracy story nobody ever heard of treating it as if it were the story the media has been ignoring (Twitter). From Kimberly Strassel: I can say i have never seen this document, nor have i read anything quoting it. I can also say it therefore bears zero relevance on the legitimate evidence about Hunter Biden’s biz, via laptop and Bobulinski (Twitter).
Hunter Biden’s ex-business partner says Joe DID know about son’s deal with Chinese energy firm and IS ‘the big guy’ in email set to get 10% cut of the deal
DOJ official confirms FBI 2019 criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, still active
WASHINGTON (SBG) – A justice department official has confirmed to Sinclair Broadcast Group that the FBI opened up a criminal investigation into Hunter Biden and his associates back in 2019, focused on allegations of money-laundering and that the probe remains active.
Sinclair investigative reporter James Rosen has also spoken with a central witness in these allegations, which suggests that former vice president Joe Biden knew more than he has acknowledged about his son’s overseas dealings.
Tony Bobulinksi was thrust into the national spotlight on the evening of the final presidential debate.
Bobulinksi discussed why he feels if elected, Biden would be compromised by the Chinese government and much more in an exclusive interview with Rosen.
The compromise they have is that in documents that have been well provided to the Senate, to Congress, to the Department of Justice via the FBI that CEFC was effectively loaning money directly to the Biden family.
Bobulinksi said he was first introduced to the former vice president in May 2017 by Hunter and Jim Biden in Beverly Hills, California.
He claimed they talked about the Biden family business plans with China, despite the Democratic nominee on several occasions denying he had any involvement, including the final presidential debate when Biden said, “I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life.”
During his remarks that same night, Bobulinksi displayed three phones he claimed contained evidence against the Bidens that would be turned over to the FBI.
Less than a week later, Bobulisnki was interviewed by members of the FBI for several hours, where he says they went over each piece of evidence found on the phones.
Bubolinksi on FBI meeting. Video: Sinclair Broadcast Group
My impression was everyone in that room was aware of the sensitivity of the parties involved and potential multiple impacts to this country and every citizen living in it.
A veteran of the United States Navy, Bobulinksi held a top-secret security clearance for several years.
When asked if China may be in possession of any potential evidence that could help shed light on these claims, Bobulisnki said the country might have information on the Biden’s business dealings across the entire globe.
Bubolinksi on China evidence. Video: Sinclair Broadcast Group
I can only imagine to the extent that the Chinese communist party has information on the Biden family and their business dealings. Other business dealings that occurred in Romania, Khazakstan, Georgia, Monaco and the Middle East, and then obviously topping off in Russia.
Bobulinksi said he decided to speak out publicly when he heard Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and other Democrats who suggested these allegations were part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Before that, Bobulinksi noted it was the impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump that was the spark that made him want to gather his information and provide it to the authorities.
Bubolinksi on coming forward. Video: Sinclair Broadcast Group
“I didn’t want to put my face out there, I didn’t want to put my family at risk. I now have ex-Navy SEALs guarding my family and my extended family and I have now put myself in huge risk for the sake of the American people.”
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller