thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-10--Should Citizen Militias Prep For Post-Election Mayhem?

Last week in this space , I illustrated how liberalism has been nothing more than the soft-socialist wedge radical leftists have used over the last several decades to incrementally advance a megalithic socialist state .
Further , that our 50 years of employing tolerance , fair play , guarded rhetoric and capitulating to liberal demands have given rise to the radical factions that are spearheading the budding communist revolution we see taking place around us , the most notable example being the violent demonstrations that are taking place in many of our cities .
Early on in the process , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Donald Trump handling this unpleasantness with extreme caution , lest his action or inaction be interpreted as tacit support for racism and police brutality against black Americans ( the pretext being used to justify the rioting ) .
Recently , the failure of Democratic governors , mayors and other officials to act against rioters in these beleaguered localities prompted conservative commentator and filmmaker Dinesh D ’ Souza to address the issue in starkly sobering fashion .
In an interview earlier this week , D ’ Souza said that ongoing rioting could lead to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tensions are not quickly deescalated .
Stressing the fact that he was predicting this possibility rather than advocating for it , D ’ Souza pointed out that otherwise law-abiding citizens will soon have no other alternative in the face of local governments and state governors allowing the rioting to continue ( due to their ideological kinship with the rioters ) , ordering law enforcement to stand down while hiring private security teams to protect their persons and property .
• Constitutional Militia 2.0 – Restoring The Real Law Enforcement Of The People • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Constitutional Militia with Dr. Edwin Vieira • The Constitutional Militia : What It Is & How We Can Restore It • Constitutional Militia & Grand Juries – The People ’ s Teeth In The Constitution • Is America On The Verge Of The Battle Of Lexington 2.0 ?
D ’ Souza ’ s admonitions aren ’ t at all out-of-turn , either .
As the rioting has continued in our major cities and expanded to many others , murmurings of civil war have become almost commonplace .
At this juncture , I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to see someone – even citizen militias – decisively neutralize Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioters .
I would also not be surprised in the least if meetings have been taking places in community centers , churches , garages and other locations across the country in which distressed citizens are discussing their options .
It is my considered opinion that citizen militias have not yet arisen for many of the same reasons that our president has been markedly reserved in meeting force with force , respect for the rule of law being chief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of beliefs that I ’ m sure many of my fellow citizens will find controversial , even in the face of the communist revolution taking place under our noses .
The first is that civil war – and all the unpleasantness this conjures – would be a far superior outcome to radical leftists gaining ascendancy .
The second is that it is time for those perpetuating violence in our cities to be neutralized with extreme prejudice .
I ’ m not going to attempt to justify these positions ; they ’ re simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unprecedented level of antipathy leftists have demonstrated for our president , the illegal attempted coup ( impeachment proceedings ) against him , the ginned-up anti-racism movement and the protracted rioting , it doesn ’ t take a political strategist to see that Washington Democrats and their surrogates ( including the radical factions fomenting violent demonstrations ) do not intend to suffer another Trump term , regardless of what the electorate has to say .
Whether or not the rioting is halted prior to the general election in November , there ’ s every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or erupt anew when President Trump secures reelection .
Still , the possibility of citizen militias mobilizing to combat our internal enemies carries severe implications .
The rise of citizen militias may in fact be the quickest route to touching off the civil war most of us would rather avoid .
We can take it as given that every voice on the left will cry out against tyranny , thuggery , racism and anything else they can think of the instant organized , armed citizens take decisive action against lawless rioters .
Then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand : The governors and local authorities who have refused to take action against violent leftists will demonstrate no such hesitation should militias take matters into their own hands .
These agencies will quickly ascribe such action to white nationalism , and leftist governors will call out the National Guard ( which falls within their authority ) to crush the militias .
Thus , any militia organizer or commander worth his salt will be aware that the first order of business will be to remove the governor of a given state and replace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the line of succession and – more importantly – willing to take steps to keep the peace .
With proper planning , such operations might be carried out with minimal bloodshed , but I sure wouldn ’ t put any money on it .
Which brings us to the next unfortunate potential : Any citizen militia acting against lawless state authorities will have to be prepared to neutralize members of law enforcement acting at the behest of those authorities .
That is going to be a singularly difficult proposition for anyone who otherwise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to that the tactical proficiency militia members would have to employ to overcome trained law enforcement personnel , and one can see how this could get very messy very quickly .
As much as I would like to see these violent demonstrators crushed , I would rather see President Trump temporarily federalize the National Guard via executive order to deal with rioters , as when John F. Kennedy sent the National Guard to Alabama to help enforce school integration in the face of Gov .
George Wallace ’ s resistance to same .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of citizen militias has to do with the unlikely possibility of a Biden-Harris win in November .
If there are indeed citizens organizing and preparing for the worst , given the deportment of the left ( including congressional Democrats ) over the last four years , there may be many among them who ’ ve already decided that they do not intend to suffer even one Biden term , regardless of what the electorate has to say .

Last week in this space, I illustrated how liberalism has been nothing more than the soft-socialist wedge radical leftists have used over the last several decades to incrementally advance a megalithic socialist state. Further, that our 50 years of employing tolerance, fair play, guarded rhetoric and capitulating to liberal demands have given rise to the radical factions that are spearheading the budding communist revolution we see taking place around us, the most notable example being the violent demonstrations that are taking place in many of our cities.
Early on in the process, I pointed out the imperative for President Donald Trump handling this unpleasantness with extreme caution, lest his action or inaction be interpreted as tacit support for racism and police brutality against black Americans (the pretext being used to justify the rioting).
Recently, the failure of Democratic governors, mayors and other officials to act against rioters in these beleaguered localities prompted conservative commentator and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza to address the issue in starkly sobering fashion. In an interview earlier this week, D’Souza said that ongoing rioting could lead to the rise of citizen militias if societal tensions are not quickly deescalated.
Stressing the fact that he was predicting this possibility rather than advocating for it, D’Souza pointed out that otherwise law-abiding citizens will soon have no other alternative in the face of local governments and state governors allowing the rioting to continue (due to their ideological kinship with the rioters), ordering law enforcement to stand down while hiring private security teams to protect their persons and property.
D’Souza’s admonitions aren’t at all out-of-turn, either. As the rioting has continued in our major cities and expanded to many others, murmurings of civil war have become almost commonplace.
At this juncture, I am quite certain that many Americans would like to see someone – even citizen militias – decisively neutralize Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioters. I would also not be surprised in the least if meetings have been taking places in community centers, churches, garages and other locations across the country in which distressed citizens are discussing their options. It is my considered opinion that citizen militias have not yet arisen for many of the same reasons that our president has been markedly reserved in meeting force with force, respect for the rule of law being chief among these.
I hold a couple of beliefs that I’m sure many of my fellow citizens will find controversial, even in the face of the communist revolution taking place under our noses. The first is that civil war – and all the unpleasantness this conjures – would be a far superior outcome to radical leftists gaining ascendancy. The second is that it is time for those perpetuating violence in our cities to be neutralized with extreme prejudice. I’m not going to attempt to justify these positions; they’re simply offered to provide context.
Given the unprecedented level of antipathy leftists have demonstrated for our president, the illegal attempted coup (impeachment proceedings) against him, the ginned-up anti-racism movement and the protracted rioting, it doesn’t take a political strategist to see that Washington Democrats and their surrogates (including the radical factions fomenting violent demonstrations) do not intend to suffer another Trump term, regardless of what the electorate has to say. Whether or not the rioting is halted prior to the general election in November, there’s every reason to believe it will either escalate or erupt anew when President Trump secures reelection.
Still, the possibility of citizen militias mobilizing to combat our internal enemies carries severe implications. The rise of citizen militias may in fact be the quickest route to touching off the civil war most of us would rather avoid.
We can take it as given that every voice on the left will cry out against tyranny, thuggery, racism and anything else they can think of the instant organized, armed citizens take decisive action against lawless rioters.
Then, there’s the dynamic at hand: The governors and local authorities who have refused to take action against violent leftists will demonstrate no such hesitation should militias take matters into their own hands. These agencies will quickly ascribe such action to white nationalism, and leftist governors will call out the National Guard (which falls within their authority) to crush the militias.
Thus, any militia organizer or commander worth his salt will be aware that the first order of business will be to remove the governor of a given state and replace him or her with whoever is in the line of succession and – more importantly – willing to take steps to keep the peace. With proper planning, such operations might be carried out with minimal bloodshed, but I sure wouldn’t put any money on it.
Which brings us to the next unfortunate potential: Any citizen militia acting against lawless state authorities will have to be prepared to neutralize members of law enforcement acting at the behest of those authorities. That is going to be a singularly difficult proposition for anyone who otherwise respects and supports law enforcement. Add to that the tactical proficiency militia members would have to employ to overcome trained law enforcement personnel, and one can see how this could get very messy very quickly.
As much as I would like to see these violent demonstrators crushed, I would rather see President Trump temporarily federalize the National Guard via executive order to deal with rioters, as when John F. Kennedy sent the National Guard to Alabama to help enforce school integration in the face of Gov. George Wallace’s resistance to same.
My final concern over the possible rise of citizen militias has to do with the unlikely possibility of a Biden-Harris win in November. If there are indeed citizens organizing and preparing for the worst, given the deportment of the left (including congressional Democrats) over the last four years, there may be many among them who’ve already decided that they do not intend to suffer even one Biden term, regardless of what the electorate has to say.
Article posted with permission from Erik Rush


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--More Concern People Won’t Take The Vaccine – Why?

If the vaccine for COVID-19 won ’ t be made mandatory , why is there always a politician or official or expert expressing concerns that the American public won ’ t take it ?
What is in this thing that makes every single authoritarian eager to plunge needles into our arms ?
Previously , Bill Gates and Dr. Anthony Fauci have both been worried that the public won ’ t find a rushed vaccine to be very safe .
Polling has shown that that ’ s exactly how Americans feel and the coronavirus panic and fear being perpetuated by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well lately to convince people to line up for the shot .
So what gives ?
These same people pushing a vaccine continue to talk about a “ dark winter ” or elude to winter as a time frame for something big .
Dr. Fauci is now concerned that a rushed vaccine is “ fueling the perception that the vaccine is not safe or that it ’ s being rushed for political purposes.
” Did you catch it ?
It ’ s fueling perception ... meaning this is a battle for your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to be safe .
It has to be perceived to be safe .
This is a truly disturbing dystopia we have found ourselves in .
Whoever controls your perception , controls your reality .
Question everything .
Especially something rushed that will be injected into every human being on this planet if they get their way .
Fauci told the New Yorker that he “ never liked , ” the name “ Operation Warp Speed ” because it “ suggests , incorrectly… that you ’ re prematurely putting something out there that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ echoing concerns he voiced in August that it “ subliminally ” suggests “ reckless speed.
” But there ’ s been little about this vaccine that ’ s been “ subliminal.
” Everyone , including anchors on Fox News , Joe Biden , Donald Trump , and the entire Trump administration are intent upon vaccinating the public .
Even though polling shows skepticism about taking a vaccine , many ( 68 % ) are confident that the Food and Drug Administration ould only approve a safe vaccine , meaning they won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up their sleeve and take this shot .
Another question we should all be pondering is IF the ruling class is so concerned about the safety of a vaccine , why have the vaccine manufacturers been given immunity if their product causes serious harm or even death ?
Probably because , as we all know , this vaccine is about control and nothing else .
We don ’ t even know what ’ s in this thing and these puppets want us to line up to be injected .
Why are they so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the hell is in this vaccine ?
There ’ s a lot of speculation , but it ’ s difficult to come by actual ingredients on this concoction , and even if we did , who is to say there are not things in there that were conveniently left off the ingredient list .

If the vaccine for COVID-19 won’t be made mandatory, why is there always a politician or official or expert expressing concerns that the American public won’t take it? What is in this thing that makes every single authoritarian eager to plunge needles into our arms?
Previously, Bill Gates and Dr. Anthony Fauci have both been worried that the public won’t find a rushed vaccine to be very safe. Polling has shown that that’s exactly how Americans feel and the coronavirus panic and fear being perpetuated by the mainstream media hasn’t been working as well lately to convince people to line up for the shot. So what gives?
These same people pushing a vaccine continue to talk about a “dark winter” or elude to winter as a time frame for something big. Dr. Fauci is now concerned that a rushed vaccine is “fueling the perception that the vaccine is not safe or that it’s being rushed for political purposes.” Did you catch it? It’s fueling perception...meaning this is a battle for your perception. The vaccine doesn’t have to be safe. It has to be perceived to be safe. This is a truly disturbing dystopia we have found ourselves in.
Whoever controls your perception, controls your reality. Question everything. Especially something rushed that will be injected into every human being on this planet if they get their way.
Fauci told the New Yorker that he “never liked,” the name “Operation Warp Speed” because it “suggests, incorrectly… that you’re prematurely putting something out there that isn’t entirely safe,” echoing concerns he voiced in August that it “subliminally” suggests “reckless speed.”
But there’s been little about this vaccine that’s been “subliminal.” Everyone, including anchors on Fox News, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and the entire Trump administration are intent upon vaccinating the public.
Even though polling shows skepticism about taking a vaccine, many (68%) are confident that the Food and Drug Administration ould only approve a safe vaccine, meaning they won’t ask any questions when told to lift up their sleeve and take this shot.
Alan “The-State-Can-Plunge-A-Needle-In-Your-Arm” Dershowitz Is In Epstein’s “Little Black Book”
Another question we should all be pondering is IF the ruling class is so concerned about the safety of a vaccine, why have the vaccine manufacturers been given immunity if their product causes serious harm or even death? Probably because, as we all know, this vaccine is about control and nothing else. We don’t even know what’s in this thing and these puppets want us to line up to be injected.
Why are they so intent upon vaccinating the public? And what the hell is in this vaccine? There’s a lot of speculation, but it’s difficult to come by actual ingredients on this concoction, and even if we did, who is to say there are not things in there that were conveniently left off the ingredient list.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--Deutsche Bank Elitists Warn:  “The Age Of Disorder” Is Coming!

The ruling elites from Deutsche Bank are warning that the “ age of disorder ” is coming .
If you know anything about those wealthy bankers who pull the strings of the political puppets , you know they desire to control and own the world , and regularly use the phrase “ ordo ab chao.
” Order out of chaos .
Deutsche Bank analysts have said in a new research note , that this “ age of disorder ” will likely reshape politics and economics .
And you can bet none of that “ reshaping ” will be done in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They will “ reorder ” society as they see fit to keep us in a two-tier society as their slaves .
While we saw “ the best-combined asset price growth of any era in history , with equity and bond returns very strong across the board ” since 1980 , “ the Age of Disorder ” is likely to break this trend , said Deutsche Bank elitists , according to a report by RT .
Economic war will go on complete with tariffs , sanctions , and attacks in the technology sphere @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election say the banksters .
These slave masters want to shift even more power and fiat currency away from the public and into their hands .
“ Such a shift in the balance of power could include a harsher inheritance tax regime , less income protection for pensioners , more property taxes , along with greater income and corporates taxes… and all-round more redistributive policies , ” the Deutsche Bank report said .
Translation , be ready to be their slave and obey their commands .
Pay attention and be aware of what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not live in fear .
Knowing is different than fearing .
It gives you the opportunity to prepare yourself and get ready for what they have planned for us .
This is all a scam to force us to be slaves to the elites .
The government is in on it and most of them are puppets of all of these “ elitists ” who think they have the right to own others .
Slavery needs to be abolished for good , and all forms should go including enslavement to democracy .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controversial statement ” is a testament to how well they have been able to control the minds of the public .
The Science of Fear : How The Elitists Use it to Control Us & How to Break Free

The ruling elites from Deutsche Bank are warning that the “age of disorder” is coming. If you know anything about those wealthy bankers who pull the strings of the political puppets, you know they desire to control and own the world, and regularly use the phrase “ordo ab chao.” Order out of chaos.
Deutsche Bank analysts have said in a new research note, that this “age of disorder” will likely reshape politics and economics. And you can bet none of that “reshaping” will be done in the best interests of the general population. They will “reorder” society as they see fit to keep us in a two-tier society as their slaves.
While we saw “the best-combined asset price growth of any era in history, with equity and bond returns very strong across the board” since 1980, “the Age of Disorder” is likely to break this trend, said Deutsche Bank elitists, according to a report by RT. Economic war will go on complete with tariffs, sanctions, and attacks in the technology sphere regardless of who wins the 2020 presidential election say the banksters.
These slave masters want to shift even more power and fiat currency away from the public and into their hands. “Such a shift in the balance of power could include a harsher inheritance tax regime, less income protection for pensioners, more property taxes, along with greater income and corporates taxes… and all-round more redistributive policies,” the Deutsche Bank report said. Translation, be ready to be their slave and obey their commands.
Pay attention and be aware of what’s going on, but do not live in fear. Knowing is different than fearing. It gives you the opportunity to prepare yourself and get ready for what they have planned for us.
PREPPING FOR THE UPCOMING GOVERNMENT-INDUCED FOOD SHORTAGES
This is all a scam to force us to be slaves to the elites. The government is in on it and most of them are puppets of all of these “elitists” who think they have the right to own others. Slavery needs to be abolished for good, and all forms should go including enslavement to democracy. The fact that that’s a “controversial statement” is a testament to how well they have been able to control the minds of the public.
The Science of Fear: How The Elitists Use it to Control Us & How to Break Free
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--Netflix’s Cuties Drama Puts Pedophilia Issue Center Stage

The controversy that kicked off over a poster for a new Netflix film called “ Cuties ” has intensified after the release of the film on September 9 in the US exploded claims by the streaming service that the artwork did not reflect the film .
“ Cuties is a social commentary against the sexualization of young children , ” a Netflix spokeswoman told the Daily Caller on Thursday .
“ It ’ s an award winning film and a powerful story about the pressure young girls face on social media and from society more generally growing up – and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about these important issues to watch the movie.
” However , nearly 600,000 people have signed a Change.org petition titled , “ Cancel Netflix Subscription ” .
The French film has also prompted the hashtag # CancelNetflix to trend on social media .
Netflix stock dropped from $ 509 on Wednesday to $ 480 at mid-day on Friday — wiping several billion dollars from its valuation since the # CancelNetflix hashtag started trending — although this flux could also be attributed to general market conditions .
“ I discovered the poster [ at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public , ” director Maïmouna Doucouré said in an interview this month with Deadline .
“ My reaction ?
It was a strange experience .
I hadn ’ t seen the poster until after I started getting all these reactions on social media , direct messages from people , attacks on me .
I didn ’ t understand what was going on .
That was when I went and saw what the poster looked like.
” Doucouré said she hoped Cuties would “ make a big change in this world that hypersexualizes children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were “ not representative of the film and especially its message.
” “ I really put my heart into this film , ” Doucouré told Deadline .
She claims the story is partially autobiographical and about “ children who have to navigate between a liberal Western culture and a conservative culture at home ” .
However , the reaction to the film itself has eclipsed the controversy over the original poster .
Indeed , the movie is rated TV-MA by US authorities , which carries the advisory : “ This program is intended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audiences and may be unsuitable for children under 17.
” This adult plot stars four 11-year-old girls .
Out of 6,500 reviews on IMDB , the film garners an average of 1.7 out 10 .
Over at Rotten Tomatoes there is a stark contrast between media critics ’ appraisals , averaging at 88 percent , and the audience response , at 3 percent .
According to The Blaze on Thursday , IMDB ’ s film page for Cuties described a moment in the film as “ lawfully defined as pedophilia ” .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ read : “ During one of the many highly sexualized & erotic dance scenes that purposefully exploit & objectify numerous scantily clad under age [ sic ] girls , one of the female child dancers lifts up her cropped top to fully display her bare breast .
This is lawfully defined as pedophilia and can be extremely distressing to many viewers.
” The page has since been modified , although a visit to internet archive site Wayback Machine confirms the original posts .
Netflix may yet face legal repercussions for airing the film @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Title 18 , section 2256 of Chapter 110 — “ sexual exploitation and other abuse of children ” .
The Fifth Circuit court established the “ Dost test ” in 1986 — a six-factor test to determine if images are child porn : 1 .
Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child ’ s genitalia or pubic area ; 2 .
Whether the setting of the depiction is sexually suggestive , that is , in a place or pose associated with sexual activity ; 3 .
Whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pose or in inappropriate attire , considering the age of the child ; 4 .
Whether the child is fully or partially nude ; 5 .
Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity ; or 6 .
Whether the depiction is designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer .
Earlier this month , Turkey ordered Netflix to remove Cuties from its country ’ s catalogue .
Netflix is currently the biggest streaming service in America .
On its board sit Barack and Michelle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Harry Windsor .
These normally loquacious media personalities have been very quiet on the controversy .
In an interview with Tucker Carlson Tonight this week , political activist Tammy Bruce said : “ Maybe Jeffrey Epstein didn ’ t kill himself , and he ’ s working as a consultant — for films , again.
” On the other hand , the New Yorker magazine said the film was done “ as a condemnation of the patriarchy.
” The New Yorker had no qualms about endorsing the movie , calling it “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ target of a right-wing campaign.
” Britain ’ s Daily Telegraph called it “ a provocative powder-keg for an age terrified of child sexuality.
” Netflix has described it variously as a “ social commentary against the sexualization of young children ” an “ award winning film ” and “ a powerful story ” .
So is it an indictment of child sexual exploitation or a celebration ?
And where does the # MeToo movement stand on this issue ?
Was it hijacked and then discarded by globalists for their disruptive agenda , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its public supporters run for the hills under the weight of hypocrisy of messages emanating from celebrity mouths ?
The film choreographs the children to be suggestive and sexual in scenes that place the emphasis on the characters being inherently sexual , rather than innocents who are being conditioned by social media .
Even the scene on the bed with Amy ( Fathia Youssouf ) and Angelica ( Médina El Aidi-Azouni ) involving them prostrate and gobbling up candy on the “ marital bed ” is reminiscent of pornographic scenarios .
What justification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the crotches of the girls and on the exposed bottom of one child , after she has her pants forcibly removed — itself an aggressive sexual behavior ?
The dance routine by the girls involves them twerking , lying on the floor face down while pumping their buttocks in simulated sex , posing with their legs spread wide , and touching themselves intimately .
On their way to the competition , they are stopped by security guards , who are then “ twerked ” by the girls in order to gain entry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her vagina and posting it online , a five-year-old taking a turn at webcam porn , the protagonist at one point tries to snap a photo of a boy in a urinal , and a girl is shown blowing up a used condom .
If this film was about exploring the sinister aspects of objectification and sexualization of children , then it could have carried subplots that highlighted the seedy nature of rap and Latin culture ’ s self-sexualization tropes and the mental health effects of pre-pubescent sexualization .
Instead , the film @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the porn industry to create a perverse lens through which the audience must participate if it is to engage with the story .
One does not come away after an hour and thirty-six minutes feeling more knowledgeable of , or empathetic towards , a young girl ’ s world view , but rather as someone who has been guided through an experience of scopophilia .
This is not even the so-called male gaze , but rather the pervert ’ s gaze .
Doucouré says she has also received “ extraordinary support ” from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ film will be used as an educational tool in her home country .
She signed with Creative Artists Agency in Los Angeles after her film was selected for the Sundance festival .
CAA was of course closely associated with Harvey Weinstein .
Pixar and Disney films for children have been found to contain pizza delivery trucks , in the former , and the rectangular squiggle that the CIA identified as a pedophile symbol in the latter ’ s movies .
Although there is no evidential link between those symbolic inclusions in their kids @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been found in Disney films going back decades .
Just because Cuties is a foreign language film does not exclude it from scrutiny on those terms .
The liberal media commentators who call the controversy over Cuties a “ right-wing ” campaign say that most of those people haven ’ t even seen the film .
But having seen the film myself , I would say that the columnists in the corporate media haven ’ t watched the film with an expert , semiotic eye .
As has been reported extensively on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reach into all corners of state institutions , not least the church .
What is becoming apparent now is that a $ 150 billion industry exists to exploit and traffic youngsters , as evidenced by the widespread arrests and military operations across the country instituted by the current administration .
Those figures and harsh realities are not so easy to dismiss , even though they may not sit well in the cocktail bars of the liberal cognoscenti or be given adequate coverage by the corporate media .
Cuties has polarized opinions between the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the general public , but judging by the swift uproar and pragmatism calling for its removal from Netflix , the film may well suffer what the French call “ la petite mort ” .
Article posted with permission from Corey Lynn , originally published at CoreysDigs.com

The controversy that kicked off over a poster for a new Netflix film called “Cuties” has intensified after the release of the film on September 9 in the US exploded claims by the streaming service that the artwork did not reflect the film.
“Cuties is a social commentary against the sexualization of young children,” a Netflix spokeswoman told the Daily Caller on Thursday. “It’s an award winning film and a powerful story about the pressure young girls face on social media and from society more generally growing up – and we’d encourage anyone who cares about these important issues to watch the movie.”
However, nearly 600,000 people have signed a Change.org petition titled, “Cancel Netflix Subscription”. The French film has also prompted the hashtag #CancelNetflix to trend on social media.
Netflix stock dropped from $509 on Wednesday to $480 at mid-day on Friday — wiping several billion dollars from its valuation since the #CancelNetflix hashtag started trending — although this flux could also be attributed to general market conditions.
“I discovered the poster [at] the same time as the American public,” director Maïmouna Doucouré said in an interview this month with Deadline. “My reaction? It was a strange experience. I hadn’t seen the poster until after I started getting all these reactions on social media, direct messages from people, attacks on me. I didn’t understand what was going on. That was when I went and saw what the poster looked like.”
Doucouré said she hoped Cuties would “make a big change in this world that hypersexualizes children” and said that the Netflix posters were “not representative of the film and especially its message.”
“I really put my heart into this film,” Doucouré told Deadline. She claims the story is partially autobiographical and about “children who have to navigate between a liberal Western culture and a conservative culture at home”.
However, the reaction to the film itself has eclipsed the controversy over the original poster. Indeed, the movie is rated TV-MA by US authorities, which carries the advisory: “This program is intended to be viewed by mature, adult audiences and may be unsuitable for children under 17.” This adult plot stars four 11-year-old girls.
Out of 6,500 reviews on IMDB, the film garners an average of 1.7 out 10. Over at Rotten Tomatoes there is a stark contrast between media critics’ appraisals, averaging at 88 percent, and the audience response, at 3 percent.
According to The Blaze on Thursday, IMDB’s film page for Cuties described a moment in the film as “lawfully defined as pedophilia”.
It claimed a parental warning on the film read: “During one of the many highly sexualized & erotic dance scenes that purposefully exploit & objectify numerous scantily clad under age [sic] girls, one of the female child dancers lifts up her cropped top to fully display her bare breast. This is lawfully defined as pedophilia and can be extremely distressing to many viewers.”
The page has since been modified, although a visit to internet archive site Wayback Machine confirms the original posts.
Netflix may yet face legal repercussions for airing the film in the U.S., due to violations of Title 18, section 2256 of Chapter 110 — “sexual exploitation and other abuse of children”. The Fifth Circuit court established the “Dost test” in 1986 — a six-factor test to determine if images are child porn: 1. Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child’s genitalia or pubic area; 2. Whether the setting of the depiction is sexually suggestive, that is, in a place or pose associated with sexual activity; 3. Whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of the child; 4. Whether the child is fully or partially nude; 5. Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity; or 6. Whether the depiction is designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.
Earlier this month, Turkey ordered Netflix to remove Cuties from its country’s catalogue.
Netflix is currently the biggest streaming service in America. On its board sit Barack and Michelle Obama, Susan Rice, Meghan Markle and Harry Windsor. These normally loquacious media personalities have been very quiet on the controversy.
In an interview with Tucker Carlson Tonight this week, political activist Tammy Bruce said: “Maybe Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself, and he’s working as a consultant — for films, again.”
On the other hand, the New Yorker magazine said the film was done “as a condemnation of the patriarchy.”
The New Yorker had no qualms about endorsing the movie, calling it “the extraordinary Netflix debut that became the target of a right-wing campaign.” Britain’s Daily Telegraph called it “a provocative powder-keg for an age terrified of child sexuality.”
Netflix has described it variously as a “social commentary against the sexualization of young children” an “award winning film” and “a powerful story”.
So is it an indictment of child sexual exploitation or a celebration?
And where does the #MeToo movement stand on this issue? Was it hijacked and then discarded by globalists for their disruptive agenda, causing it to implode? Or did its public supporters run for the hills under the weight of hypocrisy of messages emanating from celebrity mouths?
The film choreographs the children to be suggestive and sexual in scenes that place the emphasis on the characters being inherently sexual, rather than innocents who are being conditioned by social media. Even the scene on the bed with Amy (Fathia Youssouf) and Angelica (Médina El Aidi-Azouni ) involving them prostrate and gobbling up candy on the “marital bed” is reminiscent of pornographic scenarios. What justification was there for having close up shots on the crotches of the girls and on the exposed bottom of one child, after she has her pants forcibly removed — itself an aggressive sexual behavior?
The dance routine by the girls involves them twerking, lying on the floor face down while pumping their buttocks in simulated sex, posing with their legs spread wide, and touching themselves intimately. On their way to the competition, they are stopped by security guards, who are then “twerked” by the girls in order to gain entry. The plot involves one girl photographing her vagina and posting it online, a five-year-old taking a turn at webcam porn, the protagonist at one point tries to snap a photo of a boy in a urinal, and a girl is shown blowing up a used condom.
If this film was about exploring the sinister aspects of objectification and sexualization of children, then it could have carried subplots that highlighted the seedy nature of rap and Latin culture’s self-sexualization tropes and the mental health effects of pre-pubescent sexualization. Instead, the film borrows shooting conventions and stylistic devices from the porn industry to create a perverse lens through which the audience must participate if it is to engage with the story. One does not come away after an hour and thirty-six minutes feeling more knowledgeable of, or empathetic towards, a young girl’s world view, but rather as someone who has been guided through an experience of scopophilia. This is not even the so-called male gaze, but rather the pervert’s gaze.
Doucouré says she has also received “extraordinary support” from the French government, and that the film will be used as an educational tool in her home country.
She signed with Creative Artists Agency in Los Angeles after her film was selected for the Sundance festival. CAA was of course closely associated with Harvey Weinstein.
Pixar and Disney films for children have been found to contain pizza delivery trucks, in the former, and the rectangular squiggle that the CIA identified as a pedophile symbol in the latter’s movies. Although there is no evidential link between those symbolic inclusions in their kids’ films, sexual or phallic imagery has been found in Disney films going back decades. Just because Cuties is a foreign language film does not exclude it from scrutiny on those terms.
The liberal media commentators who call the controversy over Cuties a “right-wing” campaign say that most of those people haven’t even seen the film. But having seen the film myself, I would say that the columnists in the corporate media haven’t watched the film with an expert, semiotic eye.
As has been reported extensively on this site, sexual crimes against children reach into all corners of state institutions, not least the church. What is becoming apparent now is that a $150 billion industry exists to exploit and traffic youngsters, as evidenced by the widespread arrests and military operations across the country instituted by the current administration. Those figures and harsh realities are not so easy to dismiss, even though they may not sit well in the cocktail bars of the liberal cognoscenti or be given adequate coverage by the corporate media.
Cuties has polarized opinions between the media’s arbiters of taste and the general public, but judging by the swift uproar and pragmatism calling for its removal from Netflix, the film may well suffer what the French call “la petite mort”.
Article posted with permission from Corey Lynn, originally published at CoreysDigs.com


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--Critiquing Islam, Fighting Against Grooming Of Children By Muslims & LGBT & Standing For Free Speech

The UK is experiencing an onslaught of demonic forces like never before .
The US is also experiencing these things the further we move away from God ( Deuteronomy 28 ; Leviticus 26 ) .
In the UK , one group , Hearts Of Oak , are engaged in critiquing Islam , with a special focus on the grooming gangs , opposing the sexualization of children and the LGBT agenda in schools , fighting for free speech , which is under threat , and opposing our mainstream media .
Peter Mcilvenna , a Christian in the UK , has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lord Pearson of Rannoch for the past six years and launched https : //HeartsOfOak.org back in February of this year along with Tommy Robinson , Carl Benjamin ( YouTuber Sargon of Akkad ) , Catherine Blaiklock ( founder of The Brexit Party ) and Pastor Wale Babatunde ( an Anglo-Nigerian pastor ) .
He joins me in this episode to tell what God has done through them in this short amount of time .
Find out more about Peter and what his organization is doing at the following links .
Parler : https @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to his `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him @ @ @ @ @ @ @

The UK is experiencing an onslaught of demonic forces like never before. The US is also experiencing these things the further we move away from God (Deuteronomy 28; Leviticus 26). In the UK, one group, Hearts Of Oak, are engaged in critiquing Islam, with a special focus on the grooming gangs, opposing the sexualization of children and the LGBT agenda in schools, fighting for free speech, which is under threat, and opposing our mainstream media. Peter Mcilvenna, a Christian in the UK, has been working in the House of Lords for Lord Pearson of Rannoch for the past six years and launched https://HeartsOfOak.org back in February of this year along with Tommy Robinson, Carl Benjamin (YouTuber Sargon of Akkad), Catherine Blaiklock (founder of The Brexit Party) and Pastor Wale Babatunde (an Anglo-Nigerian pastor). He joins me in this episode to tell what God has done through them in this short amount of time.
Find out more about Peter and what his organization is doing at the following links.
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/ HeartsofOak
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ HeartsofOakUK
Facebook: https://fb.com/ HearsofOakOfficial
VK: https://vk.com/heartsofoak
Telegram: https://t.me/HeartsofOak
Website: https://heartsofoak.org
[email protected]
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--Founder Of Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth Richard Gage Destroys Official 9/11 Narrative

On this special 9/11 edition of the Free Thought Project podcast , Johnny Liberty and Matt Agorist sit down with Mr. Richard Gage , AIA .
Mr. Gage is a 30-year San Francisco Bay Area architect and member of the American Institute of Architects .
He is the founding member of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth .
Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher , David Ray Griffin , on the radio in 2006 , which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than 3,000 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11 .
As an architect he has worked on most types of building construction , including numerous fire-proofed steel framed buildings .
Most recently he worked on the construction documents for a $ 400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail , parking structure , and mid-rise office space—altogether about with 1,200 tons of steel framing .
During the podcast , Mr. Gage delves into the bombshell scientific revelations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and scientists have uncovered which destroy the official establishment narrative .
During the podcast we discuss several potential solutions to finally getting the government to admit the evidence is stacked against their official story .
The links to participate in this activism are below .
Justice Rising Conference | 9/11 in 2020 watch it here , Friday , Saturday and Sunday .
Get involved and bring A & E for 9/11 Truth with you to present this information to your representative .
Please visit us on iTunes and leave a good review to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
You can do that at this link .
Or , you can listen to our podcast on Spotify as well .
Here is the link to our channel on Spotify .
If you are not on our email list , please sign up here .
If you ’ d like to subscribe to our site to aid in the battle against the censors and receive special perks along the way , you can do so at this link .
We are also working with the folks from minds.com and have created a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
You can follow us at this link .
We have police the police on minds.com as well .
Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA .
This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state .
Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world .
Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project .

On this special 9/11 edition of the Free Thought Project podcast, Johnny Liberty and Matt Agorist sit down with Mr. Richard Gage, AIA. Mr. Gage is a 30-year San Francisco Bay Area architect and member of the American Institute of Architects. He is the founding member of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, on the radio in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. AE911Truth now numbers more than 3,000 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11.
As an architect he has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel framed buildings. Most recently he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, parking structure, and mid-rise office space—altogether about with 1,200 tons of steel framing.
During the podcast, Mr. Gage delves into the bombshell scientific revelations he and his fellow architects, engineers and scientists have uncovered which destroy the official establishment narrative. During the podcast we discuss several potential solutions to finally getting the government to admit the evidence is stacked against their official story. The links to participate in this activism are below.
Justice Rising Conference | 9/11 in 2020 watch it here, Friday, Saturday and Sunday.
Sign the Petition here.
Donate here.
Get involved and bring A&E for 9/11 Truth with you to present this information to your representative.
Please visit us on iTunes and leave a good review to help push this information to the masses. You can do that at this link.
Or, you can listen to our podcast on Spotify as well. Here is the link to our channel on Spotify.
If you are not on our email list, please sign up here.
If you’d like to subscribe to our site to aid in the battle against the censors and receive special perks along the way, you can do so at this link.
We are also working with the folks from minds.com and have created a platform on their uncensored network as well. You can follow us at this link.
We have police the police on minds.com as well.
And Instagram too.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--Never Forget:  In 2020, A 4 Year Study Found That “Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse On 9/11”

Never Forget : In 2020 , A 4 Year Study Found That “ Fire Did Not Cause Building 7 ’ s Collapse On 9/11 ” As the media frenzy around 9/11 reminds us today to “ never forget ” there is some crucial information that the establishment absolutely wants all Americans to forget — the overwhelming abundance of evidence that pokes serious holes in the official narrative of what happened that fateful day .
On September 11 , 2001 , at 5:20 p.m. , World Trade Center Building 7 suddenly collapsed into its own footprint , falling at free fall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complete destruction .
WTC 7 was not hit by a plane .
After it collapsed , Americans were told that office fires caused a unique — never before seen — complete architectural failure leading to the building collapsing into its own footprint at the rate of gravity .
Naturally , skeptics have been questioning the official story for some time and after moving from the realm of conspiracy theory into the realm of science , this extensive university study has found that the official story of fire causing the collapse is simply not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced the completed partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks ( UAF ) in their final report of an in depth four-year study on what they say actually brought down WTC 7 .
According to the press release , contrary to the conclusions of NIST , the UAF research team finds that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was not caused by fires but instead was caused by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building .
“ Our study found that the fires @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the observed collapse , ” said Professor Leroy Hulsey , the study ’ s principal investigator .
“ The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.
” The extensive four-year study was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth ( AE911Truth ) , a nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization ’ s petition calling for new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11 .
“ We are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alaska Fairbanks and Professor Leroy Hulsey in conducting a genuinely scientific study into the reasons for this building ’ s collapse , ” said Richard Gage , president and founder of AE911Truth .
“ It is now incumbent upon the building community , the media , and government officials to reckon with the implications of these findings and launch a new full-scale investigation.
” According to the study ’ s authors : The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ First , we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13 , where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred .
Second , we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology ( NIST ) .
Third , we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studying countless scenarios , the study ’ s authors , J. Leroy Hulsey , Ph.D. , P.E.
, S.E.
, UAF , Zhili Quan , Ph.D. , Bridge Engineer South Carolina Department of Transportation , and Feng Xiao , Ph.D. , Associate Professor Nanjing University of Science and Technology Department of Civil Engineering , concluded the following : The results of this study can not be dismissed .
It completely destroys the narrative that has been shoved down the throats of Americans for nearly two decades .
What ’ s more , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , scientists , and engineers who have been pointing this out for years .
As TFTP reported last July , history was made in regard to 9/11 as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day .
The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “ overwhelming evidence ” that “ pre-planted explosives .
.
.
caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.
” On July 24 , 2019 , the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a hamlet of 30,000 residents just outside of Queens , New York , became the first legislative body in the country to officially support a new investigation into the events of 9/11 , according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth .
The resolution calling for a new investigation was drafted by Commissioner Christopher Gioia and it was immediately and unanimously approved by the five commissioners .
“ We ’ re a tight-knit community and we never forget our fallen brothers and sisters .
You better believe that when the entire fire service @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we will be an unstoppable force , ” said Commissioner Christopher Gioia , adding , “ We were the first fire district to pass this resolution .
We won ’ t be the last .
”

Never Forget: In 2020, A 4 Year Study Found That “Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse On 9/11”
As the media frenzy around 9/11 reminds us today to “never forget” there is some crucial information that the establishment absolutely wants all Americans to forget — the overwhelming abundance of evidence that pokes serious holes in the official narrative of what happened that fateful day.
On September 11, 2001, at 5:20 p.m., World Trade Center Building 7 suddenly collapsed into its own footprint, falling at free fall speed for 2.5 seconds of its seven-second complete destruction. WTC 7 was not hit by a plane. After it collapsed, Americans were told that office fires caused a unique — never before seen — complete architectural failure leading to the building collapsing into its own footprint at the rate of gravity.
Despite calls for the evidence to be preserved, New York City officials had the building’s debris removed and destroyed in the ensuing weeks and months, preventing a proper forensic investigation from ever taking place. Seven years later, federal investigators concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.
Naturally, skeptics have been questioning the official story for some time and after moving from the realm of conspiracy theory into the realm of science, this extensive university study has found that the official story of fire causing the collapse is simply not true.
As TFTP reported in April, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced the completed partnership with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in their final report of an in depth four-year study on what they say actually brought down WTC 7. According to the press release, contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team finds that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was not caused by fires but instead was caused by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
The extensive four-year study was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), a nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization’s petition calling for new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11.
“We are proud to have supported the University of Alaska Fairbanks and Professor Leroy Hulsey in conducting a genuinely scientific study into the reasons for this building’s collapse,”
said Richard Gage, president and founder of AE911Truth. “It is now incumbent upon the building community, the media, and government officials to reckon with the implications of these
findings and launch a new full-scale investigation.”
According to the study’s authors:
The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
After conducting comprehensive modeling and studying countless scenarios, the study’s authors, J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D., P.E., S.E., UAF, Zhili Quan, Ph.D., Bridge Engineer South Carolina Department of Transportation, and Feng Xiao, Ph.D., Associate Professor Nanjing University of Science and Technology Department of Civil Engineering, concluded the following:
Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
The results of this study cannot be dismissed. It completely destroys the narrative that has been shoved down the throats of Americans for nearly two decades. What’s more, this study backs up thousands of other researchers, scientists, and engineers who have been pointing this out for years.
As TFTP reported last July, history was made in regard to 9/11 as New York area fire commissioners called for a new investigation into the tragic events that unfolded that day. The resolution called for a new investigation due to the “overwhelming evidence” that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings.”
On July 24, 2019, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District, which oversees a volunteer fire department serving a hamlet of 30,000 residents just outside of Queens, New York, became the first legislative body in the country to officially support a new investigation into the events of 9/11, according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
The resolution calling for a new investigation was drafted by Commissioner Christopher Gioia and it was immediately and unanimously approved by the five commissioners.
“We’re a tight-knit community and we never forget our fallen brothers and sisters. You better believe that when the entire fire service of New York State is on board, we will be an unstoppable force,” said Commissioner Christopher Gioia, adding, “We were the first fire district to pass this resolution. We won’t be the last.”
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--ARRESTED: Leftist who ‘FIREBOMBED Republican women’s club and tried to burn it to the ground’

ARRESTED : Leftist who ‘ FIREBOMBED Republican women ’ s club and tried to burn it to the ground ’ Imagine if Democrat women were targeted with bombs….. civil war , folks .
A MAN has been arrested for allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails through the windows at a women ’ s Republican club in California .
Carlos Espriu , 23 , is accused of breaking through the windows of the East Valley Republican Women Federated office in La Quinta with a baseball bat on May 31 , according to Fox News .
Carlos Espriu , 23 , has been arrested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republican club on fire Espriu was caught on video breaking into the building and setting it on fireCredit : GoFundMe Authorities said Espriu lit three Molotov cocktails to set the building on fire .
Espriu was caught on surveillance cameras coming back after the cocktails failed to light the building on fire , and throwing them again , cops said .
The second arson attempt was successful , according to reports .
A GoFundMe page set up to help pay for damages from the attack said that the club has been targeted by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The terrorizing goes on .
Their headquarters have experienced increased hostility , including : multiple harassing phone calls daily , eggs thrown at the windows , and drive-by shouting accompanied by obscene gestures , ” the page said .
The page also said that the club anticipates “ more vandalism as the election approaches.
” Espriu was caught in an audio recording explaining how he made the Molotov cocktails He ’ s facing up to 20 years in prison for the attackCredit : GoFundMe Firefighters were able to quickly put out the blaze @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suspect was able to evade police for months , however , local police and the FBI Inland Empire Joint Terrorism Task Force closed in on Espriu after gathering tips , the Desert Sun reported .
He was captured after leaving a house party on Wednesday and charged with arson , attempted arson , and property destruction .
The suspect was reportedly caught in an audio recording telling a woman that he shaved his head after police released surveillance video of him to evade capture .

ARRESTED: Leftist who ‘FIREBOMBED Republican women’s club and tried to burn it to the ground’
Imagine if Democrat women were targeted with bombs….. civil war, folks.
TRUMP FANS ATTACKED Unhinged man Carlos Espriu, 23, ‘FIREBOMBED Republican women’s club and tried to burn it to the ground’
By: Laura Gesualdi-Gilmore, The Sun, Sep 11 2020:
A MAN has been arrested for allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails through the windows at a women’s Republican club in California.
Carlos Espriu, 23, is accused of breaking through the windows of the East Valley Republican Women Federated office in La Quinta with a baseball bat on May 31, according to Fox News.
Carlos Espriu, 23, has been arrested for allegedly setting a women’s Republican club on fire
Espriu was caught on video breaking into the building and setting it on fireCredit: GoFundMe
Authorities said Espriu lit three Molotov cocktails to set the building on fire.
Espriu was caught on surveillance cameras coming back after the cocktails failed to light the building on fire, and throwing them again, cops said.
The second arson attempt was successful, according to reports.
A GoFundMe page set up to help pay for damages from the attack said that the club has been targeted by multiple vandals in recent months.
“The terrorizing goes on. Their headquarters have experienced increased hostility, including: multiple harassing phone calls daily, eggs thrown at the windows, and drive-by shouting accompanied by obscene gestures,” the page said.
The page also said that the club anticipates “more vandalism as the election approaches.”
Espriu was caught in an audio recording explaining how he made the Molotov cocktails
He’s facing up to 20 years in prison for the attackCredit: GoFundMe
Firefighters were able to quickly put out the blaze and no injuries were reported.
The suspect was able to evade police for months, however, local police and the FBI Inland Empire Joint Terrorism Task Force closed in on Espriu after gathering tips, the Desert Sun reported.
He was captured after leaving a house party on Wednesday and charged with arson, attempted arson, and property destruction.
He’s being held on a $1million bond.
The suspect was reportedly caught in an audio recording telling a woman that he shaved his head after police released surveillance video of him to evade capture.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--As Trump Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize, Here Are Some of Its Worst Winners

While there have been some worthy winners in its 119-year history , the Nobel Peace Prize has very often been handed to some of the world ’ s worst warmongers and war criminals .
Donald Trump has been nominated for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize .
The President of the United States was put forward by the far-right Norwegian member of parliament , Christian Tybring-Gjedde , who insists he is “ not a big Trump supporter , ” despite nominating him last year as well .
Tybring-Gjedde ’ s stated reason for nominating Trump is for his work in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normalizes relations between the two nations .
While there have been a number of people and organizations already nominated for the award , Trump is immediately considered among the favorites to win , his odds drastically shortening with bookmakers today .
The announcement was predictably applauded by supporters of the president , who voiced their approval online .
Meanwhile , His detractors were unsurprisingly shocked and dismayed by the news .
“ Trump being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by far-right anti-immigration nut job Christian Tybring-Gjedde is like getting a letter of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pyromaniac , ” wrote Dr. Eugene Gu , one of the president ’ s most vocal online opponents .
The prize is often considered among the most esteemed awards any individual can win ; a recognition of a supreme commitment to someone who has given “ the greatest benefit to humankind , ” in the organization ’ s own words .
But while there have been some worthy winners in its 119-year history , the prize ( and its ~ $ 1 million cash reward ) has very often been handed to some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals , including the following examples .
Burmese politician Aung San Suu Kyi received the award in 1991 “ for her non-violent struggle for democracy and human rights.
” For much of the time between 1989 and 2010 , she was kept under house arrest by the ruling military junta .
Time magazine labeled her a “ child of Gandhi ” for her supposed commitment to pacifism .
Yet since her ascension to the office of state counselor ( the Burmese version of prime minister ) , she has overseen the Burmese army @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her own country , defending and supporting the same military who used to keep her locked up .
In 2017 she insisted that even ethnic cleansing was “ too strong a word ” to describe events , claiming that “ it is Muslims killing Muslims , ” but denying visas to United Nations officials who wished to investigate the atrocities .
The violence is known to have killed at least 24,000 people and forced more than 730,000 Muslims to flee to neighboring Bangladesh .
A host of Israeli leaders , including Menachem Begin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have also won the prize for their supposed efforts in bringing peace to the Middle East , even though Israel has militarily occupied much of Palestine and parts of Syria for decades , continually breaking ceasefires to attack its neighbors .
In 1996 , for instance , Peres ordered Operation Grapes of Wrath , the most notorious chapter of which was the Qana massacre , where 106 Lebanese civilians were killed .
Peres appeared proud of his actions ; “ Everything was done according to clear logic and in a responsible way , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1967 , troops under Rabin ’ s command are thought to have killed around 1,000 Egyptian prisoners of war en masse .
Barack Obama was surprisingly given the award in 2009 , after only a few months in office , the Nobel Institute claiming that he was helping rid the planet of nuclear weapons , bringing peace to the world , and to tackle climate change , all of which in 2020 appear rather questionable claims .
Much of the Institute ’ s justification for the award is in the future tense .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ be strengthened , ” they wrote , suggesting the prize-givers were awarding him for his promises rather than his actions .
In reality , Obama expanded the American war machine , bombing seven countries simultaneously , earning the moniker the “ Drone King.
” According to U.S. government documents , nearly 90 percent of those he killed were civilians .
Other estimates put that number much higher .
Perhaps the most egregious Nobel Peace Prize winner of all time was American war planner Henry Kissinger .
Kissinger was one of the chief architects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the 1960s and 1970s , actively sabotaging President Johnson ’ s peace talks with the Viet Minh resistance .
He also delivered the infamous orders for the massive bombing of Cambodia ; “ Anything that flies on anything that moves , ” he instructed .
He also supported Indonesia ’ s genocide in East Timor and the Pakistani crackdown against Bangladesh ’ s independence movement .
Kissinger was the mastermind behind the attacks on Salvador Allende ’ s Chile , attempting to “ make the economy scream , ” also supporting and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end of democracy in the South American nation .
While Kissinger gratefully accepted his prize , his co-recipient , Vietnamese negotiator Le Duc Tho , is the only individual to reject the prize , doing so on the grounds that peace had not been achieved .
“ Once the Paris accord on Vietnam is respected , the arms are silenced and a real peace is established in South Vietnam , I will be able to consider accepting this prize , ” he said .
The U.S. would not stop bombing for another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a great deal of consternation at the idea of Trump receiving the prize , the reality is that it has already drifted so far from Alfred Nobel ’ s original intention of awarding it to individuals who spend their lives “ challenging militarism ” that it as often as not awarded to infamous warmongers .
Trump would merely be joining a select rogue ’ s gallery if he were to win .

While there have been some worthy winners in its 119-year history, the Nobel Peace Prize has very often been handed to some of the world’s worst warmongers and war criminals. Donald Trump has been nominated for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize. The President of the United States was put forward by the far-right Norwegian member of parliament, Christian Tybring-Gjedde, who insists he is “not a big Trump supporter,” despite nominating him last year as well. Tybring-Gjedde’s stated reason for nominating Trump is for his work in the UAE-Israel deal signed last month, which normalizes relations between the two nations.
While there have been a number of people and organizations already nominated for the award, Trump is immediately considered among the favorites to win, his odds drastically shortening with bookmakers today.
The announcement was predictably applauded by supporters of the president, who voiced their approval online. Meanwhile, His detractors were unsurprisingly shocked and dismayed by the news. “Trump being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by far-right anti-immigration nut job Christian Tybring-Gjedde is like getting a letter of recommendation to be a firefighter by a pyromaniac,” wrote Dr. Eugene Gu, one of the president’s most vocal online opponents.
The prize is often considered among the most esteemed awards any individual can win; a recognition of a supreme commitment to someone who has given “the greatest benefit to humankind,” in the organization’s own words. But while there have been some worthy winners in its 119-year history, the prize (and its ~$1 million cash reward) has very often been handed to some of the world’s most reprehensible individuals, including the following examples.
Burmese politician Aung San Suu Kyi received the award in 1991 “for her non-violent struggle for democracy and human rights.” For much of the time between 1989 and 2010, she was kept under house arrest by the ruling military junta. Time magazine labeled her a “child of Gandhi” for her supposed commitment to pacifism. Yet since her ascension to the office of state counselor (the Burmese version of prime minister), she has overseen the Burmese army’s genocide of Rohingya Muslims in her own country, defending and supporting the same military who used to keep her locked up. In 2017 she insisted that even ethnic cleansing was “too strong a word” to describe events, claiming that “it is Muslims killing Muslims,” but denying visas to United Nations officials who wished to investigate the atrocities. The violence is known to have killed at least 24,000 people and forced more than 730,000 Muslims to flee to neighboring Bangladesh.
A host of Israeli leaders, including Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, have also won the prize for their supposed efforts in bringing peace to the Middle East, even though Israel has militarily occupied much of Palestine and parts of Syria for decades, continually breaking ceasefires to attack its neighbors. In 1996, for instance, Peres ordered Operation Grapes of Wrath, the most notorious chapter of which was the Qana massacre, where 106 Lebanese civilians were killed. Peres appeared proud of his actions; “Everything was done according to clear logic and in a responsible way,” he said. Meanwhile, in 1967, troops under Rabin’s command are thought to have killed around 1,000 Egyptian prisoners of war en masse.
Barack Obama was surprisingly given the award in 2009, after only a few months in office, the Nobel Institute claiming that he was helping rid the planet of nuclear weapons, bringing peace to the world, and to tackle climate change, all of which in 2020 appear rather questionable claims. Much of the Institute’s justification for the award is in the future tense. “Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened,” they wrote, suggesting the prize-givers were awarding him for his promises rather than his actions. In reality, Obama expanded the American war machine, bombing seven countries simultaneously, earning the moniker the “Drone King.” According to U.S. government documents, nearly 90 percent of those he killed were civilians. Other estimates put that number much higher.
Perhaps the most egregious Nobel Peace Prize winner of all time was American war planner Henry Kissinger. Kissinger was one of the chief architects of the U.S. attack on Southeast Asia in the 1960s and 1970s, actively sabotaging President Johnson’s peace talks with the Viet Minh resistance. He also delivered the infamous orders for the massive bombing of Cambodia; “Anything that flies on anything that moves,” he instructed. He also supported Indonesia’s genocide in East Timor and the Pakistani crackdown against Bangladesh’s independence movement. Kissinger was the mastermind behind the attacks on Salvador Allende’s Chile, attempting to “make the economy scream,” also supporting and abetting the fascist coup that resulted in the end of democracy in the South American nation.
While Kissinger gratefully accepted his prize, his co-recipient, Vietnamese negotiator Le Duc Tho, is the only individual to reject the prize, doing so on the grounds that peace had not been achieved. “Once the Paris accord on Vietnam is respected, the arms are silenced and a real peace is established in South Vietnam, I will be able to consider accepting this prize,” he said. The U.S. would not stop bombing for another two years.
While there has been a great deal of consternation at the idea of Trump receiving the prize, the reality is that it has already drifted so far from Alfred Nobel’s original intention of awarding it to individuals who spend their lives “challenging militarism” that it as often as not awarded to infamous warmongers. Trump would merely be joining a select rogue’s gallery if he were to win.
Article posted with permission from MintPress News


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-11--How Do You Beat The Beast System?  You Unite Against It, Like These People!

How Do You Beat The Beast System ?
You Unite Against It , Like These People !
Editor ’ s Note : This will work if people come together to oppose the tyranny .
And to add to Mac ’ s examples .
Take a look at what happened to the Sons of Liberty ’ s health and wellness expert Kate Shemirani last Saturday and also how Mark Steele and the people handled cops when they tried to arrest him .
People want solutions to the tyranny and beast system being shoved down our throats , and even though it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the right to rule you ) they need real-world examples of what that would look like .
Well , here ’ s one .
Citizens in Spain united together to stop the Spanish police from arresting a woman who refused to wear a face mask .
The entire exchange was caught on video .
The people banded together and literally stood up to the governments ’ enforcers and prevented the police from arresting the woman .
The clip shows officers attempting to pull the older woman away from the crowd , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away from the cops , writes Paul Joseph Watson on Summit News .
This is a perfect example of how we beat this system and take it down .
People need to stop just watching the tyranny around them and actually stand up for their fellow human beings .
We are all being enslaved at a rapid pace and if we can not figure it out it will be permanent enslavement .
This will immediately end when we all respond this way .
When we decide to come to the aid of those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be able to rise above these monsters violently pushing the dictates of the ruling class on us .
Tyranny Ends When We Say It Does , and The Time Is NOW !
If we can not wake up to what ’ s being done to us , put politics aside ( because it ’ s all just theater anyway ) , stop believing in the illusion of rulers and government , we will end up in a prison for our minds that will rival George Orwell ’ s 1984 .
That is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve been paying attention , you know that .
Are Directed Energy Weapons Starting Fires In California and Oregon !
?
Jeff Berwick also explains in his most recent video the simple solution .
Because the “ ramifications of what ’ s going on are unquantifiable , ” it ’ s hard to predict what will happen .
explains Berwick .
But we have a choice .
We wake up , realize no one has the right to rule us , steal from us , or force us to use their money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We are far past the stage of a “ gray area ” small government situation .
We are either free , or slaves , and it ’ s us who will make that decision .
If you do not wish to watch the entire almost 33-minute video , go to 11:40 to hear his take : “ You don ’ t need to protest the Federal Reserve , ” Berwick explains .
“ Really , humanity needs to wake up a little bit and stop using [ the Federal Reserve ’ s ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and start using cryptocurrencies .
By doing that , if enough people did it , it would just get rid of the central banks all on its own.
” That ’ s a very simple solution , but understandably , most grocery stores don ’ t normally take Bitcoin , so it could present some difficulties .
“ A lot of people just need to wake up , ” Berwick reiterates .
“ Just move away from all their systems .
Stop obeying the authority .
Stop using their currencies .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a lot of the problems.
” It really is simple , but people do need to realize that they are hopelessly dependent on the system and the false left-right paradigm before we can evolve as a human race and be free instead of slaves .
The good news is that “ a lot of people are starting to wake up.
” People are slowly beginning to realize that no one has a higher claim over their life and property than they do .
Once there are enough people who realize that reality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wanting to control anyone else .
“ People are waking up to the fact that the government is not their friend , ” says Berwick .
And he ’ s right .
Left , right , or anything in between .
Once power is given it is never ceded willingly .

Editor’s Note: This will work if people come together to oppose the tyranny. And to add to Mac’s examples. Take a look at what happened to the Sons of Liberty’s health and wellness expert Kate Shemirani last Saturday and also how Mark Steele and the people handled cops when they tried to arrest him.
People want solutions to the tyranny and beast system being shoved down our throats, and even though it’s simple (stop believing others have the right to rule you) they need real-world examples of what that would look like. Well, here’s one.
Citizens in Spain united together to stop the Spanish police from arresting a woman who refused to wear a face mask. The entire exchange was caught on video. The people banded together and literally stood up to the governments’ enforcers and prevented the police from arresting the woman.
The clip shows officers attempting to pull the older woman away from the crowd, but the crowd still manages to wrestle her away from the cops, writes Paul Joseph Watson on Summit News.
“In Spain, police tried to arrest a woman for not wearing a mask. Dozens of people took off their masks and then helped the woman,” states the description accompanying the video.
This is a perfect example of how we beat this system and take it down. People need to stop just watching the tyranny around them and actually stand up for their fellow human beings. We are all being enslaved at a rapid pace and if we cannot figure it out it will be permanent enslavement.
This will immediately end when we all respond this way. When we decide to come to the aid of those who are being forcibly terrorized, we will be able to rise above these monsters violently pushing the dictates of the ruling class on us.
Tyranny Ends When We Say It Does, and The Time Is NOW!
If we cannot wake up to what’s being done to us, put politics aside (because it’s all just theater anyway), stop believing in the illusion of rulers and government, we will end up in a prison for our minds that will rival George Orwell’s 1984. That is not an exaggeration either and if you’ve been paying attention, you know that.
Are Directed Energy Weapons Starting Fires In California and Oregon!?
Jeff Berwick also explains in his most recent video the simple solution. Because the “ramifications of what’s going on are unquantifiable,” it’s hard to predict what will happen. explains Berwick. But we have a choice. We wake up, realize no one has the right to rule us, steal from us, or force us to use their money, or we don’t. We are far past the stage of a “gray area” small government situation. We are either free, or slaves, and it’s us who will make that decision. If you do not wish to watch the entire almost 33-minute video, go to 11:40 to hear his take:
“You don’t need to protest the Federal Reserve,” Berwick explains. “Really, humanity needs to wake up a little bit and stop using [the Federal Reserve’s] currency, dollars or pesos or whatever, and start using cryptocurrencies. By doing that, if enough people did it, it would just get rid of the central banks all on its own.” That’s a very simple solution, but understandably, most grocery stores don’t normally take Bitcoin, so it could present some difficulties.
“A lot of people just need to wake up,” Berwick reiterates. “Just move away from all their systems. Stop obeying the authority. Stop using their currencies. And very quickly, we can get rid of a lot of the problems.” It really is simple, but people do need to realize that they are hopelessly dependent on the system and the false left-right paradigm before we can evolve as a human race and be free instead of slaves.
The good news is that “a lot of people are starting to wake up.” People are slowly beginning to realize that no one has a higher claim over their life and property than they do. Once there are enough people who realize that reality, it’s over for anyone wanting to control anyone else.
“People are waking up to the fact that the government is not their friend,” says Berwick. And he’s right. Left, right, or anything in between. Once power is given it is never ceded willingly.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-12--The View Propaganda:  Ivanka Trump Claims She’ll Take COVID Vaccine

President Donald Trump ’ s daughter claims she will be vaccinated with the coronavirus concoction on the TV show The View after Joy Behar announced she has no intention of taking a Covid-19 vaccine before Ivanka Trump .
Not only will Ms. Trump attempt to convince us to take the vaccine , but she also says we should “ trust ” the FDA .
Trust the FDA ?
Yes , she wrote that on Twitter .
Everyone , including politicians on the right ( who want to use the military to roll out this vaccine in a “ powerful way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinated .
This should be a major red flag .
According to RT , most of the reactions to Trump ’ s offer have been slams against her and her father , she was offered some support by her brother , Donald Trump Jr , among others .
Trump declared this week that a Covid-19 vaccine could be ready by October and will be “ very safe and effective.
” Critics have pushed back against his claim , citing a rushed process as a reason to be distrustful of the efficacy of any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine is concerned , I ’ d like to inform America , in case we don ’ t know this because I looked all this up for you , the mumps vaccine took four years , the polio vaccine took 20 years and the smallpox vaccine took a few centuries , ” Behar said on Wednesday .
–RT This is all just more propaganda using the left/right paradigm illusion to convince you to suspend your critical thinking , roll up your sleeve , and take the shot .
Even with all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get vaccinated , around half of the country is still skeptical .
Trump Administration Is Stockpiling 3 Different Types Of COVID-19 Vaccines President Trump himself has offered to take the vaccine “ first or last , ” depending on what is better for his political standing .
“ Well , you know the way it works .
If I ’ m the first one they ’ ll say ‘ He ’ s so selfish .
He wanted to get the vaccine first .
Then other people would say ‘ Hey , that ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ’ ” he told Fox News in July .
“ I would absolutely if they wanted me to and thought it was right , I ’ d take it first or I ’ d take it last , ” he added .
Sadly , this is just more evidence that they are all in on it and they all want you to get vaccinated .

President Donald Trump’s daughter claims she will be vaccinated with the coronavirus concoction on the TV show The View after Joy Behar announced she has no intention of taking a Covid-19 vaccine before Ivanka Trump. Not only will Ms. Trump attempt to convince us to take the vaccine, but she also says we should “trust” the FDA.
Trust the FDA? Yes, she wrote that on Twitter. Everyone, including politicians on the right (who want to use the military to roll out this vaccine in a “powerful way”), wants you to get vaccinated. This should be a major red flag.
Deal @JoyVBehar. I would come on your show to do so. I trust the FDA and so should all Americans. Vanquishing this virus should be our collective top priority. https://t.co/FXb0Dqjdio — Ivanka Trump (@IvankaTrump) September 10, 2020
According to RT, most of the reactions to Trump’s offer have been slams against her and her father, she was offered some support by her brother, Donald Trump Jr, among others.
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1304056113743224832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1304056113743224832%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.shtfplan.com%2Fheadline-news%2Fivanka-trump-says-shell-take-the-vaccine-on-the-view
Trump declared this week that a Covid-19 vaccine could be ready by October and will be “very safe and effective.” Critics have pushed back against his claim, citing a rushed process as a reason to be distrustful of the efficacy of any such vaccine. “As far as the vaccine is concerned, I’d like to inform America, in case we don’t know this because I looked all this up for you, the mumps vaccine took four years, the polio vaccine took 20 years and the smallpox vaccine took a few centuries,” Behar said on Wednesday. –RT
This is all just more propaganda using the left/right paradigm illusion to convince you to suspend your critical thinking, roll up your sleeve, and take the shot. Even with all of the politicians on all sides demanding we get vaccinated, around half of the country is still skeptical.
Trump Administration Is Stockpiling 3 Different Types Of COVID-19 Vaccines
President Trump himself has offered to take the vaccine “first or last,” depending on what is better for his political standing. “Well, you know the way it works. If I’m the first one they’ll say ‘He’s so selfish. He wanted to get the vaccine first. Then other people would say ‘Hey, that’s a very brave thing to do,’” he told Fox News in July. “I would absolutely if they wanted me to and thought it was right, I’d take it first or I’d take it last,” he added.
Sadly, this is just more evidence that they are all in on it and they all want you to get vaccinated.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-12--Tyranny Growing In UK – But So Is Opposition To It With Kate Shemirani

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to his `` more @ @ @ @ @ , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian @ @ @ @ @ He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim @ @ @ @ @ him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com . He is husband to his "more precious than rubies" wife, father of 10 "mighty arrows", jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. . Follow Tim on Twitter . Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit


thewashingtonstandard--2020-09-12--Former NSA Director Who Oversaw Spying Program Joins Amazon’s Board Of Directors

In a new filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission this week , Amazon revealed that former NSA director Keith Alexander will be joining the company ’ s board of directors .
Alexander was the controversial spokesperson for the NSA when the agency was facing scrutiny over Edward Snowden ’ s leaks , which revealed the details of a massive spy program .
During the scandal , Alexander discouraged the media from reporting on the details of the leaks , and talked about Snowden as if he was a war criminal .
“ I think it ’ s wrong that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the 50,000-whatever they have and are selling them and giving them out as if these — you know it just doesn ’ t make sense .
We ought to come up with a way of stopping it .
I don ’ t know how to do that .
That ’ s more of the courts and the policymakers but , from my perspective , it ’ s wrong to allow this to go on , ” Alexander said in an interview in 2013 .
Snowden responded to Alexander ’ s new board @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Services is responsible for hosting a large number of websites , and now the person who oversaw the mass surveillance program is going to be getting access to all of it .
Last week , a federal appeals court ruled that the NSA spying programs were actually illegal and unconstitutional .
The ruling was made by Judge Marsha Berzon , who determined that the NSA had no legal authority to collect phone and internet data from innocent people under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act , or FISA .
The program was illegal because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and “ required the government to make a showing of relevance to a particular authorized investigation before collecting the records , ” Berzon said in her ruling .
Not only was the program illegal , but it was essentially worthless as well , and did nothing to prevent terrorism or bring terrorists to justice .
Berzon said that there is no evidence that the spying program actually did anything to prevent a single case of terrorism , despite claims from US officials that the programs were absolutely necessary to prevent terror attacks @

In a new filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission this week, Amazon revealed that former NSA director Keith Alexander will be joining the company’s board of directors. Alexander was the controversial spokesperson for the NSA when the agency was facing scrutiny over Edward Snowden’s leaks, which revealed the details of a massive spy program.
During the scandal, Alexander discouraged the media from reporting on the details of the leaks, and talked about Snowden as if he was a war criminal.
“I think it’s wrong that that newspaper reporters have all these documents, the 50,000-whatever they have and are selling them and giving them out as if these — you know it just doesn’t make sense. We ought to come up with a way of stopping it. I don’t know how to do that. That’s more of the courts and the policymakers but, from my perspective, it’s wrong to allow this to go on,” Alexander said in an interview in 2013.
Snowden responded to Alexander’s new board seat by pointing out that Amazon Web Services is responsible for hosting a large number of websites, and now the person who oversaw the mass surveillance program is going to be getting access to all of it.
https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1303829551999602688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Last week, a federal appeals court ruled that the NSA spying programs were actually illegal and unconstitutional. The ruling was made by Judge Marsha Berzon, who determined that the NSA had no legal authority to collect phone and internet data from innocent people under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA.
The program was illegal because FISA did not allow for bulk collection, and “required the government to make a showing of relevance to a particular authorized investigation before collecting the records,” Berzon said in her ruling.
Not only was the program illegal, but it was essentially worthless as well, and did nothing to prevent terrorism or bring terrorists to justice. Berzon said that there is no evidence that the spying program actually did anything to prevent a single case of terrorism, despite claims from US officials that the programs were absolutely necessary to prevent terror attacks.
Article posted with permission from John Vibes