thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-16--Conservatives Must Fight Big Tech or Lose: The Problem Isn’t Simply Radicalism – It’s Power

Long before , “ In Soviet Russia , television watch you ” became a staple of Cold War comedy routines , George Orwell ’ s 1984 novel had telescreens that broadcast propaganda and watched their citizens .
Behind the satire is the core question of the struggle against Big Tech today .
Is technology going to be a tool of individual choice or social control ?
Facebook and Twitter ’ s desperate attempts to block a damaging story about Joe and Hunter Biden is the culmination of four years of work to transform social media into the media .
Under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , foreign election interference , bots , networks , deepfakes , public health risks , and assorted tech paranoia , free speech died on the internet .
The moment when the White House Press Secretary had her account locked for tweeting a damaging news story about Joe Biden brought home the Big Tech reality to most Republicans .
Just like the media , Big Tech is the Democrat Party , and the Democrat Party is Big Tech .
But , unlike the media , Big Tech controls the marketplace of ideas to an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of social media and Google controls 80 % of internet search traffic .
And that ’ s bad news because Democrats see the internet in the same terms as Xi , Putin , or your average dictator just about anywhere in the world , as a dangerous system spouting disinformation , damaging social ideas , and disruptive political rhetoric that must be controlled using a combination of economic and social pressures , along with government regulation .
Republicans and Democrats are both unhappy with the internet .
Republicans are upset because there ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ upset because there isn ’ t enough censorship .
That Democrats , who once championed a free internet , now view it the same way all totalitarians do , speaks volumes not only about the death of liberalism but also about the transformation of the internet from a vox populi to a walled garden controlled by a handful of Big Tech monopolies whose cultural views and politics closely align with those of the Democrats .
‘ Bigness ’ has its own political and economic gravity .
Big cities are more likely to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely to vote for big government policies .
They ’ re also more likely to use and generate the core companies and cultures that make up Big Tech .
The old political alignments based on questions of philosophy are being tossed aside and replaced with a new alignment based on the primevally simple questions of size and power .
The struggle is less defined by abstractions , than by the question of how much power you have .
In the Trump era , the more proximity to power you have , the more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the less proximity to power you have , the more likely you are to be a Republican .
The most striking thing about the Never Trumpers and the Rust Belt and Southern Democrats voting for Trump is how much power the former have and how little power the latter do .
Politics is being reduced to naked power .
Democrats shifted their stance on the internet because they gained control of core national institutions , in no small part through the growing fortunes pouring out of Silicon Valley which have tilted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transformed public perspectives on social issues .
And they are using their newfound power to do what the powerful always do , dismantle the safeguards of an open society so that there are no more threats to their power .
They ’ re doing this under the guise of fighting for equality and justice , and of waging a revolution for the oppressed , but so did most modern tyrants from Stalin to Hitler to Mao .
The Democrats are no longer interested in a free internet , for the same reason that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the filibuster , or any institution or procedure that isn ’ t serving their interests this very minute .
This isn ’ t due to a new progressive enlightenment , Republican obstinacy , grave new threats to democracy , or any of the other talking points they serve up .
The simple answer is that they won .
The Democrats of the 90s who welcomed an open internet were waging an uphill struggle against the open institutions of a generally conservative country .
The country is now much less conservative , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every major institutional force , from the biggest companies to the media , is unreservedly and uncritically backing them every step of the way , while suppressing any suggestion that they shouldn ’ t rule unopposed for all eternity .
All that ’ s left is collecting their winnings by shutting down the opposition .
Support for free speech is a matter of principle and practical politics .
America was built on principle , but the Founding Fathers had a common-sense assessment of human nature .
Free societies may be built on principles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of power .
Every major faction must go on believing that it is in its interest to maintain free speech , checks and balances , and other protections against tyranny because it might end up needing them .
The Democrats have accumulated enough power that they no longer think that they need firewalls because if they play their cards right , the future , the right side of history , is their own .
That ’ s the fundamental development that explains the current crisis , not only of free speech , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country .
The internet , like any society ’ s marketplace of ideas , is a symptom .
Free countries have a robust marketplace of ideas .
Unfree ones are obsessed with censoring speech and monitoring their citizens , all the while spinning paranoid fantasies about foreign interference , the threat of dangerous ideas , and the risk to political stability from speech .
Anyone who came out of a coma and spent an afternoon listening to CNN ( owned by AT & T ) , reading the Washington Post ( owned by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perusing the latest round of Democrat complaints about election interference and disinformation would know what we are .
Democrat radicalism isn ’ t being driven by the powerless , but by the powerful .
That ’ s why Democrats with PhDs are more radical than those with a high school diploma .
The problem of Big Tech can ’ t be separated from the problem of a political movement with too much power .
The culture of political censorship isn ’ t merely radical , it ’ s powerful .
Cancel culture by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t disparate phenomena , they ’ re the same phenomenon , often practiced on the same platforms by members of the same inbred ruling class .
America has been reconstructed to favor some classes at the expense of others .
This new machine combining political institutions , activist groups , and corporations controls public life .
Conservatives can combat it or , like Soviet citizens , make jokes , and wait for it to collapse .
Big Tech is at the nexus of the political , economic , and cultural power of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why breaking its power must be the objective of any winning conservative movement .
The massive monopolies control political discourse and as they tighten the noose around conservatives , political speech on the internet will consist of media narratives , a few tame conservatives , and little else .
Imagine the high point of media dominance with no talk radio or cable conservative news .
That ’ s the future .
And it ’ s not going to arrive a year from now , it may already be here by Election Day .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ next presidential election arrives .
But Big Tech also holds the key to the radical money machine .
AOC and the Squad wouldn ’ t exist without a founding engineer from Stripe .
The founder of eBay is responsible for everything from The Intercept to The Bulwark , the former is the media arm of the Sanders campaign and the latter of the Never Trumpers .
The Washington Post was transformed from a fussy government paper into a den of furious radicals by the CEO of Amazon .
Google money financed the Bernie @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a massive fortune into Black Lives Matter , from Steve Jobs ’ widow , to Jeff Bezos ’ ex-wife , to Jack Dorsey , the founder of Twitter .
And that ’ s the tip of the iceberg considering Facebook ’ s Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative .
The cultural power of Big Tech is even vaster .
Google and Facebook determine what most people see on the internet .
Amazon and Netflix are swallowing the entertainment industry .
In a decade , a handful of vast , mostly , tech companies , Apple , Amazon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Google , Netflix , and Verizon will control the culture far more than the old entertainment industry ever did .
By then it will be much too late to do anything except huddle in a few dark web outposts and mutter hate speech like the controversial words of the First Amendment .
If conservatives don ’ t fight Big Tech now , they will lose .
And they will lose everything .
Big Tech ’ s power is growing exponentially , but it ’ s still vulnerable .
The companies that will become @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be brought down and broken up .
The internet and the marketplace of ideas can rise again from the ruins of those monopolies .
Now is the time .
If we don ’ t fight Big Tech now , America has no future .

Long before, “In Soviet Russia, television watch you” became a staple of Cold War comedy routines, George Orwell’s 1984 novel had telescreens that broadcast propaganda and watched their citizens. Behind the satire is the core question of the struggle against Big Tech today.
Is technology going to be a tool of individual choice or social control?
Facebook and Twitter’s desperate attempts to block a damaging story about Joe and Hunter Biden is the culmination of four years of work to transform social media into the media. Under the guise of false claims about disinformation, foreign election interference, bots, networks, deepfakes, public health risks, and assorted tech paranoia, free speech died on the internet.
The moment when the White House Press Secretary had her account locked for tweeting a damaging news story about Joe Biden brought home the Big Tech reality to most Republicans.
Just like the media, Big Tech is the Democrat Party, and the Democrat Party is Big Tech. But, unlike the media, Big Tech controls the marketplace of ideas to an unprecedented degree.
Facebook controls 80% of social media and Google controls 80% of internet search traffic.
And that’s bad news because Democrats see the internet in the same terms as Xi, Putin, or your average dictator just about anywhere in the world, as a dangerous system spouting disinformation, damaging social ideas, and disruptive political rhetoric that must be controlled using a combination of economic and social pressures, along with government regulation.
Republicans and Democrats are both unhappy with the internet. Republicans are upset because there’s too much censorship and Democrats are upset because there isn’t enough censorship.
That Democrats, who once championed a free internet, now view it the same way all totalitarians do, speaks volumes not only about the death of liberalism but also about the transformation of the internet from a vox populi to a walled garden controlled by a handful of Big Tech monopolies whose cultural views and politics closely align with those of the Democrats.
‘Bigness’ has its own political and economic gravity. Big cities are more likely to have big governments and their inhabitants are more likely to vote for big government policies. They’re also more likely to use and generate the core companies and cultures that make up Big Tech.
The old political alignments based on questions of philosophy are being tossed aside and replaced with a new alignment based on the primevally simple questions of size and power.
The struggle is less defined by abstractions, than by the question of how much power you have.
In the Trump era, the more proximity to power you have, the more likely you are to be a Democrat, and the less proximity to power you have, the more likely you are to be a Republican.
The most striking thing about the Never Trumpers and the Rust Belt and Southern Democrats voting for Trump is how much power the former have and how little power the latter do.
Politics is being reduced to naked power.
Democrats shifted their stance on the internet because they gained control of core national institutions, in no small part through the growing fortunes pouring out of Silicon Valley which have tilted elections, financed political movements, and transformed public perspectives on social issues. And they are using their newfound power to do what the powerful always do, dismantle the safeguards of an open society so that there are no more threats to their power.
They’re doing this under the guise of fighting for equality and justice, and of waging a revolution for the oppressed, but so did most modern tyrants from Stalin to Hitler to Mao.
The Democrats are no longer interested in a free internet, for the same reason that they’ve tossed away free speech, the filibuster, or any institution or procedure that isn’t serving their interests this very minute. This isn’t due to a new progressive enlightenment, Republican obstinacy, grave new threats to democracy, or any of the other talking points they serve up.
The simple answer is that they won.
The Democrats of the 90s who welcomed an open internet were waging an uphill struggle against the open institutions of a generally conservative country. The country is now much less conservative, the institutions are much less open, and every major institutional force, from the biggest companies to the media, is unreservedly and uncritically backing them every step of the way, while suppressing any suggestion that they shouldn’t rule unopposed for all eternity.
All that’s left is collecting their winnings by shutting down the opposition.
Support for free speech is a matter of principle and practical politics. America was built on principle, but the Founding Fathers had a common-sense assessment of human nature. Free societies may be built on principles, but they survive through a balance of power. Every major faction must go on believing that it is in its interest to maintain free speech, checks and balances, and other protections against tyranny because it might end up needing them.
The Democrats have accumulated enough power that they no longer think that they need firewalls because if they play their cards right, the future, the right side of history, is their own.
That’s the fundamental development that explains the current crisis, not only of free speech, but of free elections, and a free country. The internet, like any society’s marketplace of ideas, is a symptom. Free countries have a robust marketplace of ideas. Unfree ones are obsessed with censoring speech and monitoring their citizens, all the while spinning paranoid fantasies about foreign interference, the threat of dangerous ideas, and the risk to political stability from speech.
Anyone who came out of a coma and spent an afternoon listening to CNN (owned by AT&T), reading the Washington Post (owned by the CEO of Amazon), and perusing the latest round of Democrat complaints about election interference and disinformation would know what we are.
The problem isn’t simply radicalism. It’s power.
Democrat radicalism isn’t being driven by the powerless, but by the powerful. That’s why Democrats with PhDs are more radical than those with a high school diploma. The problem of Big Tech can’t be separated from the problem of a political movement with too much power.
The culture of political censorship isn’t merely radical, it’s powerful. Cancel culture by college students or Big Tech censorship aren’t disparate phenomena, they’re the same phenomenon, often practiced on the same platforms by members of the same inbred ruling class.
America has been reconstructed to favor some classes at the expense of others. This new machine combining political institutions, activist groups, and corporations controls public life.
Conservatives can combat it or, like Soviet citizens, make jokes, and wait for it to collapse.
Big Tech is at the nexus of the political, economic, and cultural power of this new machine. That’s why breaking its power must be the objective of any winning conservative movement.
The massive monopolies control political discourse and as they tighten the noose around conservatives, political speech on the internet will consist of media narratives, a few tame conservatives, and little else. Imagine the high point of media dominance with no talk radio or cable conservative news. That’s the future. And it’s not going to arrive a year from now, it may already be here by Election Day. And if not, certainly when the next presidential election arrives.
But Big Tech also holds the key to the radical money machine. AOC and the Squad wouldn’t exist without a founding engineer from Stripe. The founder of eBay is responsible for everything from The Intercept to The Bulwark, the former is the media arm of the Sanders campaign and the latter of the Never Trumpers. The Washington Post was transformed from a fussy government paper into a den of furious radicals by the CEO of Amazon. Google money financed the Bernie Sanders campaign. Big Tech has poured a massive fortune into Black Lives Matter, from Steve Jobs’ widow, to Jeff Bezos’ ex-wife, to Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter.
And that’s the tip of the iceberg considering Facebook’s Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative.
The cultural power of Big Tech is even vaster. Google and Facebook determine what most people see on the internet. Amazon and Netflix are swallowing the entertainment industry. In a decade, a handful of vast, mostly, tech companies, Apple, Amazon, AT&T, Disney, Google, Netflix, and Verizon will control the culture far more than the old entertainment industry ever did.
By then it will be much too late to do anything except huddle in a few dark web outposts and mutter hate speech like the controversial words of the First Amendment.
If conservatives don’t fight Big Tech now, they will lose. And they will lose everything.
Big Tech’s power is growing exponentially, but it’s still vulnerable. The companies that will become immovable oligarchies in a decade can still be brought down and broken up. The internet and the marketplace of ideas can rise again from the ruins of those monopolies.
Now is the time. If we don’t fight Big Tech now, America has no future.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--NJ MAIL-IN VOTE ONLY, NO MACHINES: Every Voter Sent Mail-in Ballot, EVEN AT THE POLLS ON ELECTION DA

NJ MAIL-IN VOTE ONLY , NO MACHINES : Every Voter Sent Mail-in Ballot , EVEN AT THE POLLS ON ELECTION DAY , Poll Votes Won ’ t Be Counted Until At Least Nov. 10 Voters who go to the polls election day won ’ t have the choice to use a machine .
Every ballot is mail-in .
It ’ s like the mafia is running NJ elections .
The Democrat criminal complex using the flu to seize control of free and fair elections .
If you vote in person on Election Day , your vote probably won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Here ’ s why .
This will be an unprecedented election in New Jersey as all active registered voters are receiving mail-in ballots because of the coronaviruspandemic .
You don ’ t have to use the mail-in ballot .
You can instead vote in person from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on November 3 — but it won ’ t work like it usually does .
And , importantly , your in-person vote won ’ t likely be counted until at least Nov. 10 .
“ We have to wait until at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day we can accept mail that ’ s postmarked by Election Day , ” said Nicole DiRado , the administrator of the Union County Board of Elections .
Officials will first count the mail-in ballots and mark in the statewide system that they have been received , she said .
After that , the provisional ballots will be counted so officials can make sure no one votes twice .
“ If we receive both , the vote-by-mail ballot will be counted first , ” she said .
“ Then there is no way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counting.
” When voters get to the polls , most won ’ t have the choice to use a machine .
Only those with disabilities who are unable to complete a paper ballot will be permitted to use voting machines , DiRado said .
The state is expected to release more guidelines on what disabilities will make a voter eligible to use a machine , but DiRado offered a few scenarios .
Blind voters , for example , can use machines that have an audio component and can read a ballot , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ markings on the ballot to make their selections .
Those with Parkinson ’ s disease would also be permitted to use a machine because it can be hard to completely fill in the bubbles on a paper ballot , she said .

NJ MAIL-IN VOTE ONLY, NO MACHINES: Every Voter Sent Mail-in Ballot, EVEN AT THE POLLS ON ELECTION DAY, Poll Votes Won’t Be Counted Until At Least Nov. 10
Voters who go to the polls election day won’t have the choice to use a machine. Every ballot is mail-in. It’s like the mafia is running NJ elections.
The Democrat criminal complex using the flu to seize control of free and fair elections.
If you vote in person on Election Day, your vote probably won’t be counted until Nov. 10 in N.J. Here’s why.
By Karin Price Mueller | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
This will be an unprecedented election in New Jersey as all active registered voters are receiving mail-in ballots because of the coronaviruspandemic.
You don’t have to use the mail-in ballot. You can instead vote in person from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on November 3 — but it won’t work like it usually does.
And, importantly, your in-person vote won’t likely be counted until at least Nov. 10.
“We have to wait until at least Nov. 10, which is the last day we can accept mail that’s postmarked by Election Day,” said Nicole DiRado, the administrator of the Union County Board of Elections.
Officials will first count the mail-in ballots and mark in the statewide system that they have been received, she said. After that, the provisional ballots will be counted so officials can make sure no one votes twice.
“If we receive both, the vote-by-mail ballot will be counted first,” she said. “Then there is no way we can enter a provisional ballot for counting.”
When voters get to the polls, most won’t have the choice to use a machine.
Only those with disabilities who are unable to complete a paper ballot will be permitted to use voting machines, DiRado said.
The state is expected to release more guidelines on what disabilities will make a voter eligible to use a machine, but DiRado offered a few scenarios.
Blind voters, for example, can use machines that have an audio component and can read a ballot, and then the voter can read the Braille markings on the ballot to make their selections.
Those with Parkinson’s disease would also be permitted to use a machine because it can be hard to completely fill in the bubbles on a paper ballot, she said.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--20 Things You Must Believe To Convince Yourself Everything Is Going To Turn Out OK In The Near Futur

20 Things You Must Believe To Convince Yourself Everything Is Going To Turn Out OK In The Near Future If You Don ’ t Take A Stand Despite everything that we have already been through in 2020 , the dominant narrative in our society right now is that everything is going to be just fine once we get past our temporary problems .
So many people that I hear from can ’ t understand why I am so “ negative ” about the future because they are completely convinced that really great days are just around the corner .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are seeing this sort of wild optimism among both Democrats and Republicans , Christians and atheists , capitalists and communists .
Of course , about half the country will have their optimistic hopes for the future brutally crushed by the results of the upcoming election , but we aren ’ t there yet .
For now , both sides are absolutely convinced that they are going to win , and both sides are envisioning a wonderful new era for our nation in which their values reign triumphant .
If only things were that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our largest problems have been steadily growing for decades , and they aren ’ t going to magically disappear just because a particular candidate wins an election .
Our debt levels are absolutely exploding , our economy has plunged into a depression , there is widespread civil unrest in our streets , our nation is more divided than it has ever been in my entire lifetime , and our society is literally coming apart at the seams as just about every form of evil that you can possibly imagine is growing rapidly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a whole lot of people out there that want to stick their heads in the sand and pretend that everything is going to be just fine .
If you would like to be just like them , the following are 20 things that you must believe in order to convince yourself that everything is going to turn out okay somehow… # 1 “ Being 27 trillion dollars in debt is not a problem .
We can go into as much debt as we want , and future generations of Americans won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all of our bills on them.
” # 2 “ The fact that the Federal Reserve creates trillions of dollars out of thin air whenever a major crisis erupts doesn ’ t really matter .
We can debase the reserve currency of the world as much as we want and the rest of the globe will continue to use it and the inflation rate in this country will never get out of control.
” # 3 “ Antifa is just an idea , and all of the rioting , looting and violence will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the upcoming election.
” # 4 “ When I see people smashing windows , setting buildings on fire and shooting at police officers , I just remember to remind myself that those are really just peaceful protesters.
” # 5 “ It is perfectly okay that a former intern for Joe Biden will moderate the next presidential debate .
He has promised that he will be perfectly neutral , and I believe him.
” # 6 “ Kamala Harris will never become president if Joe Biden wins the election , because Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could easily make it through two terms.
” # 7 “ The Democrats would never pack the Supreme Court , because Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are way too decent to ever allow that to happen.
” # 8 “ Once the election is over , the big social media companies will give us our freedom of speech back because that is the right thing to do.
” # 9 “ It makes perfect sense that the stock market has soared to record highs while the real economy has plunged into a horrifying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bubble , and stock prices will just keep going up indefinitely.
” # 10 “ It is perfectly okay that 40 percent of U.S. children are being born outside of marriage .
America can certainly prosper without strong marriages and strong families because so many other great civilizations have shown that it can be done.
” # 11 “ Even though study after study has shown that antibodies fade very rapidly and that any immunity is very short-lived , a vaccine will save us from this pandemic.
” # 12 “ Once this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t make us wear masks anymore , and they certainly wouldn ’ t try to force people to take vaccines if they don ’ t want them.
” # 13 “ Now that everyone has seen how much chaos this pandemic has caused , evil people would never purposely release more deadly viruses because they wouldn ’ t want to kick us while we are down.
” # 14 “ There is no need to worry that our relationships with Russia and China have gone down the tubes , because our military @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dare getting into a military conflict with us.
” # 15 “ Even though the head of the UN World Food Program is warning that there will be famines of ‘ biblical proportions ’ , I am sure that any food shortages are just temporary and everyone in the world will have plenty of food to eat in 2021 and beyond.
” # 16 “ More than 60 million Americans have filed new claims for unemployment benefits this year , but most of those jobs will quickly come back , and we are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of economic prosperity in U.S. history.
” # 17 “ The rapid rise in crime rates in cities all over the nation is just temporary .
I am sure that things will go back to normal in 2021.
” # 18 “ We can ignore the hundreds of earthquakes that are shaking the west coast , because ‘ the Big One ’ probably won ’ t happen for thousands of years.
” # 19 “ The fact that tens of millions of Americans will be mailing in their ballots won ’ t cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ballots will be counted quickly , efficiently and accurately , and the American people will remain perfectly calm while we wait for days or even weeks to find out the winner of the presidential election.
” # 20 “ Even though more than 60 million children have already been aborted , and even though every form of evil that you can possibly imagine is exploding all around us , there will never be any serious consequences for our actions and the greatest days for America are still ahead of us even though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
”

20 Things You Must Believe To Convince Yourself Everything Is Going To Turn Out OK In The Near Future If You Don’t Take A Stand
Despite everything that we have already been through in 2020, the dominant narrative in our society right now is that everything is going to be just fine once we get past our temporary problems. So many people that I hear from can’t understand why I am so “negative” about the future because they are completely convinced that really great days are just around the corner. As odd as this may sound, we are seeing this sort of wild optimism among both Democrats and Republicans, Christians and atheists, capitalists and communists. Of course, about half the country will have their optimistic hopes for the future brutally crushed by the results of the upcoming election, but we aren’t there yet. For now, both sides are absolutely convinced that they are going to win, and both sides are envisioning a wonderful new era for our nation in which their values reign triumphant.
If only things were that easy.
The truth is that many of our largest problems have been steadily growing for decades, and they aren’t going to magically disappear just because a particular candidate wins an election. Our debt levels are absolutely exploding, our economy has plunged into a depression, there is widespread civil unrest in our streets, our nation is more divided than it has ever been in my entire lifetime, and our society is literally coming apart at the seams as just about every form of evil that you can possibly imagine is growing rapidly all around us.
But there are a whole lot of people out there that want to stick their heads in the sand and pretend that everything is going to be just fine.
If you would like to be just like them, the following are 20 things that you must believe in order to convince yourself that everything is going to turn out okay somehow…
#1 “Being 27 trillion dollars in debt is not a problem. We can go into as much debt as we want, and future generations of Americans won’t mind at all that we are dumping all of our bills on them.”
#2 “The fact that the Federal Reserve creates trillions of dollars out of thin air whenever a major crisis erupts doesn’t really matter. We can debase the reserve currency of the world as much as we want and the rest of the globe will continue to use it and the inflation rate in this country will never get out of control.”
#3 “Antifa is just an idea, and all of the rioting, looting and violence will somehow magically come to an end after the upcoming election.”
#4 “When I see people smashing windows, setting buildings on fire and shooting at police officers, I just remember to remind myself that those are really just peaceful protesters.”
#5 “It is perfectly okay that a former intern for Joe Biden will moderate the next presidential debate. He has promised that he will be perfectly neutral, and I believe him.”
#6 “Kamala Harris will never become president if Joe Biden wins the election, because Joe Biden is so strong and vigorous that he could easily make it through two terms.”
#7 “The Democrats would never pack the Supreme Court, because Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are way too decent to ever allow that to happen.”
#8 “Once the election is over, the big social media companies will give us our freedom of speech back because that is the right thing to do.”
#9 “It makes perfect sense that the stock market has soared to record highs while the real economy has plunged into a horrifying depression. This isn’t a bubble, and stock prices will just keep going up indefinitely.”
#10 “It is perfectly okay that 40 percent of U.S. children are being born outside of marriage. America can certainly prosper without strong marriages and strong families because so many other great civilizations have shown that it can be done.”
#11 “Even though study after study has shown that antibodies fade very rapidly and that any immunity is very short-lived, a vaccine will save us from this pandemic.”
#12 “Once this virus has been eradicated, they won’t make us wear masks anymore, and they certainly wouldn’t try to force people to take vaccines if they don’t want them.”
#13 “Now that everyone has seen how much chaos this pandemic has caused, evil people would never purposely release more deadly viruses because they wouldn’t want to kick us while we are down.”
#14 “There is no need to worry that our relationships with Russia and China have gone down the tubes, because our military is so strong that nobody would ever dare getting into a military conflict with us.”
#15 “Even though the head of the UN World Food Program is warning that there will be famines of ‘biblical proportions’, I am sure that any food shortages are just temporary and everyone in the world will have plenty of food to eat in 2021 and beyond.”
#16 “More than 60 million Americans have filed new claims for unemployment benefits this year, but most of those jobs will quickly come back, and we are on the verge of the greatest era of economic prosperity in U.S. history.”
#17 “The rapid rise in crime rates in cities all over the nation is just temporary. I am sure that things will go back to normal in 2021.”
#18 “We can ignore the hundreds of earthquakes that are shaking the west coast, because ‘the Big One’ probably won’t happen for thousands of years.”
#19 “The fact that tens of millions of Americans will be mailing in their ballots won’t cause any issues at all. All of the ballots will be counted quickly, efficiently and accurately, and the American people will remain perfectly calm while we wait for days or even weeks to find out the winner of the presidential election.”
#20 “Even though more than 60 million children have already been aborted, and even though every form of evil that you can possibly imagine is exploding all around us, there will never be any serious consequences for our actions and the greatest days for America are still ahead of us even though we completely refuse to change our ways.”
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--Power Hungry Governor Struck Down By The Courts Again! Why Are The People Still Wearing Masks?

Power Hungry Governor Struck Down By The Courts Again !
Why Are The People Still Wearing Masks ?
Just this week , while I was preaching in Michigan , a man looked at my family as they were walking into the hotel that we were to stay for a couple of nights and said “ Masks.
” Of course , he was requesting of them that they should put one on and pretend with him .
I came in right behind them and caught the tail end of what he said to them and I responded , “ What did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ You have to wear a mask in Michigan.
” I asked him if he worked there and he said that he did not .
I then responded with it is “ unconstitutional ” and “ apparently you did not get the memo.
” I ended with “ Mind your own business ” ( Hosea 4:6 ) .
This should come as no surprise to anyone considering what people are dealing with in Michigan .
Apparently , power-hungry Governor Gretchen Whitmer did not get the memo either .
Friends , the Michigan Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down her un-constitutional orders ( Proverbs 7:2 ) not only once but have also come in a second time to remind her what it is that she can and can not do constitutionally ( Deuteronomy 25:1 ) .
( CNN ) The Michigan Supreme Court on Monday denied Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer ’ s request to delay the effect of an opinion that ruled her executive orders on the coronavirus pandemic are unconstitutional .
Ten days ago , the court ruled Whitmer , a Democrat who is a former prosecutor and a first-term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or renew executive orders relating to Covid-19 beyond April 30. d Whitmer filed a motion last Monday , saying more time was needed to “ allow for an orderly transition during which some responsive measures can be placed under alternative executive authority and the Governor and Legislature can work to address many other pandemic-related matters that currently fall under executive orders.
” In its order Monday , the court wrote that “ our decision today … leaves open many avenues for our Governor and Legislature to work together in a cooperative spirit and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic.
” Monday , the state Supreme Court also reversed a lower court ’ s judgment in a lawsuit brought by the Legislature , saying “ the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act is incompatible with the Constitution of our state , and therefore , executive orders issued under that act are of no continuing legal effect.
” Now , knowing all of this , I have to ask , why is it that anyone anywhere in the United States is wearing a mask ?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Power Hungry Governor Struck Down By The Courts Again! Why Are The People Still Wearing Masks?
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants.” -William Pitt
Just this week, while I was preaching in Michigan, a man looked at my family as they were walking into the hotel that we were to stay for a couple of nights and said “Masks.” Of course, he was requesting of them that they should put one on and pretend with him. I came in right behind them and caught the tail end of what he said to them and I responded, “What did you say?”
He said, “You have to wear a mask in Michigan.”
I asked him if he worked there and he said that he did not. I then responded with it is “unconstitutional” and “apparently you did not get the memo.” I ended with “Mind your own business” (Hosea 4:6).
This should come as no surprise to anyone considering what people are dealing with in Michigan.
Apparently, power-hungry Governor Gretchen Whitmer did not get the memo either.
Friends, the Michigan Supreme Court did a great job in striking down her un-constitutional orders (Proverbs 7:2) not only once but have also come in a second time to remind her what it is that she can and cannot do constitutionally (Deuteronomy 25:1).
(CNN) The Michigan Supreme Court on Monday denied Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s request to delay the effect of an opinion that ruled her executive orders on the coronavirus pandemic are unconstitutional. Ten days ago, the court ruled Whitmer, a Democrat who is a former prosecutor and a first-term governor, had no authority to issue or renew executive orders relating to Covid-19 beyond April 30.
d
Whitmer filed a motion last Monday, saying more time was needed to “allow for an orderly transition during which some responsive measures can be placed under alternative executive authority and the Governor and Legislature can work to address many other pandemic-related matters that currently fall under executive orders.” In its order Monday, the court wrote that “our decision today … leaves open many avenues for our Governor and Legislature to work together in a cooperative spirit and constitutional manner to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.” Monday, the state Supreme Court also reversed a lower court’s judgment in a lawsuit brought by the Legislature, saying “the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act is incompatible with the Constitution of our state, and therefore, executive orders issued under that act are of no continuing legal effect.”
Now, knowing all of this, I have to ask, why is it that anyone anywhere in the United States is wearing a mask?
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media. Article by Bradlee Dean.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--Doctors & Scientists Request Evaluation of Health Risks from RF Radiation & 5G by Experts with No Co

Doctors & Scientists Request Evaluation of Health Risks from RF Radiation & 5G by Experts with No Conflicts of Interest

5G technology seems to be one of those “ essential ” things that needed rolling out while businesses were threatened along with people of the coronavirus hoax .
Yet , very little testing has been done using the technology by those without a conflict of interest in the matter .
Our own Kate Shemirani pointed this out to those attacking her credentials when her registration as a nurse was under attack .
Now , many doctors and scientists are pointing to several studies showing that 5G is not safe despite the rhetoric from those supporting it .
There ARE studies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safe .
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban , delay , halt , and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment .
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies proving it isn ’ t unsafe .
Doctors and scientists have also asked for a worldwide moratorium on deployment on Earth and in space ( see 1 , 2 ) .
However , risks aren ’ t isolated to 5G technology .
Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead to health issues in a significant percentage of the population .
Unfortunately , 5G and other sources of wireless continue to be deployed .
Doctors and scientists again are asking for independent experts to be given the opportunity to weigh in on this .
That seems reasonable , doesn ’ t it ?
Health risks from radiofrequency radiation , including 5G , should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest Hardell L , Carlberg M. Health risks from radiofrequency radiation , including 5G , should be assessed by experts with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
2020 ; 20 ( 4 ) :15. doi:10.3892/ol.2020.11876 Abstract : The fifth generation , 5G , of radiofrequency ( RF ) radiation is about to be implemented globally without investigating the risks to human health and the environment .
This has created debate among concerned individuals in numerous countries .
In an appeal to the European Union ( EU ) in September 2017 , currently endorsed by > 390 scientists and medical doctors , a moratorium on 5G deployment was requested until proper scientific evaluation of potential negative consequences has been conducted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the EU .
The evaluation of RF radiation health risks from 5G technology is ignored in a report by a government expert group in Switzerland and a recent publication from The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection .
Conflicts of interest and ties to the industry seem to have contributed to the biased reports .
The lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology places populations at risk .
Furthermore , there seems to be a cartel of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees , thus reinforcing the no-risk paradigm .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific misconduct .
“ Most politicians and other decision-makers using guidelines for exposure to radiofrequency ( RF ) radiation seem to ignore the risks to human health and the environment .
The fact that the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) at the World Health Organization ( WHO ) in May 2011 classified RF radiation in the frequency range of 30 kHz to 300 GHz to be a ‘ possible ’ human carcinogen , Group 2B ( 1,2 ) , is being ignored .
This has been recently exemplified in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Estonia ( 3 ) .
” “ An important factor may be the influence on politicians by individuals and organizations with inborn conflicts of interests ( COIs ) and their own agenda in supporting the no-risk paradigm ( 4,5 ) .
The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection ( ICNIRP ) has repeatedly ignored scientific evidence on adverse effects of RF radiation to humans and the environment .
Their guidelines for exposure are based solely on the thermal ( heating ) paradigm and were first published in ICNIRP 1998 ( 6 ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and have now been newly published in ICNIRP 2020 ( 8 ) , with no change of concept , only relying on thermal effects from RF radiation on humans .
The large amount of peer-reviewed science on non-thermal effects has been ignored in all ICNIRP evaluations ( 9,10 ) .
Additionally , ICNIRP has successfully maintained their obsolete guidelines worldwide.
” Based on the Swiss and ICNIRP experiences , some recommendations can be made .
One is to include only unbiased and experienced experts without COIs for evaluation of health risks from RF @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moratorium on 5G until independent research , performed by scientists without any ties to the industry , confirms its safety or not .
2G , 3G , 4G and WiFi are also considered not to be safe , but 5G will be worse regarding harmful biological effects ( 42,83,84 ) .
The authors of the present article recommend an educational campaign to educate the public about the health risks of RF radiation exposure , and safe use of the technology , such as the deployment of wired internet in schools ( 85 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Council resolution 1815 in 2011 ( 86 ) and The EMF Scientist Appeal ( 87 ) .
Additionally , it is recommended that the government takes steps to markedly decrease the current exposure of the public to RF radiation , ( 88,89 ) .
Notably , DNA damage has been identified in peripheral blood lymphocytes using the comet assay technique , and in buccal cells using the micronucleus assay , in individuals exposed to RF radiation from base stations ( 90 ) .
“ Finally , an alternative approach to the flawed ICNIRP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the European Academy for Environmental Medicine ( EUROPAEM ) EMF working group that has resulted in safety recommendations , which are free from the ICNIRP shortcomings ( 50 ) .
Recently , the International Guidelines on Non-Ionising Radiation ( IGNIR ) have accepted EUROPAEM safety recommendations ( 91 ) .
The Bioinitiative group has recommended similar safety standards based on non-thermal EMF effects ( 92 ) .
WHO and all nations should adopt the EUROPAEM/Bioinitiative/IGNIR safety recommendations , supported by the majority of the scientific community , instead of the obsolete ICNIRP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is important that all experts evaluating scientific evidence and assessing health risks from RF radiation do not have COIs or bias .
Being a member of ICNIRP and being funded by the industry directly , or through an industry-funded foundation , constitute clear COIs .
Furthermore , it is recommended that the interpretation of results from studies on health effects of RF radiation should take sponsorship from the telecom or other industry into account .
It is concluded that the ICNIRP has failed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of health risks associated with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can not be used for guidelines on this exposure.
” This paper is an open-access article found here .
Conflicts of interest regarding 5G technology are not uncommon .
One of the most embarrassing may be The New York Times partnering with Verizon to create a 5G Journalism Lab .
OMG .
Additionally , Frank reported on 135 Doctors in Chile who have asked the health minister for a moratorium on 5G .
There ARE studies that have ALREADY determined 5G is NOT safe .
Cities AND entire countries have taken action to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment .
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies that prove it isn ’ t unsafe .
Doctors and scientists have asked for a worldwide moratorium ( see 1 , 2 ) .
They have also asked their legislators for moratoriums in various countries as well including the U.S , The Netherlands , and now Chile .
More than 130 doctors in Chile ask Health Minister Paris for a moratorium on the deployment of 5G technology A letter signed by 135 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moratorium on the deployment of 5G technology until it is certain that it does not pose a risk to human health and the environment .
“ The biological effect of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation , as is the case with 5G technology , has been extensively investigated by independent industry scientists and thousands of studies reliably demonstrate the negative biological effects on human and human health .
environment , “ the statement said .
The Doctors have proposed “ to create a Committee of Experts to analyze independently from economic and political groups , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic radio frequency waves , in the public health and assess the risks from a scientific point of view that the deployment of 5G technology could bring .
” They request “ that said commission be inter-ministerial with a representative of the Ministry of Sciences ( led by Mr. Andrés Couve C. ) , a member of the Ministry of the Environment ( led by Ms. Carolina Schmidt Z . )
, a member of the Ministry of Transportation and Telecommunications ( led by Ms. Gloria Hutt H. ) and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others , in order to achieve a qualitatively optimal , coordinated work with an impact on public policy “ .
Doctors can sign the 5G appeal at this link .
https : //uxtr.org/apelacion-chile-5g/ Link to the Letter by Doctors in Chile https : //uxtr.org/wp content/uploads/2020/10/Carta_Abierta_Dr._Enrique_Paris_UXTR_VersionFinal_.pdf This petition from France joins numerous official calls to halt 5G .
For example : • Scientific Appeal on 5G To the European Commission • 5G Appeal to Stop Deployment on Earth and Space : There are 201,383 signatories from 202 nations and territories as of February 14th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Engineers ( 8,036 ) , Medical Doctors ( 2,593 ) , Nurses ( 4,177 ) , Psychologists , Psychotherapists and Social Workers ( 9,663 ) , Doctors of Naturopathy , Homeopathy , Ayurveda and Medical Qigong ( 2,777 ) , Doctors of Oriental Medicine ( 770 ) , Chiropractors ( 412 ) , Dentists ( 438 ) , Pharmacists ( 552 ) , Architects and Builders ( 3,137 ) , Building Biologists ( 271 ) , Veterinarians ( 344 ) , • 70 doctors from Baden-Württemberg have signed the open letter to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5G of the Pancyprian Medical Association and Cyprus National Committee on the Environment and Child Health • International Society of Doctors for the Environment .
Since 2018 there have been reports about people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G was installed ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) .
Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) – including wireless – could lead to health issues in a significant percentage of the population .
Activist Post reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

5G technology seems to be one of those “essential” things that needed rolling out while businesses were threatened along with people of the coronavirus hoax. Yet, very little testing has been done using the technology by those without a conflict of interest in the matter. Our own Kate Shemirani pointed this out to those attacking her credentials when her registration as a nurse was under attack. Now, many doctors and scientists are pointing to several studies showing that 5G is not safe despite the rhetoric from those supporting it.
BN Frank reported:
There ARE studies that have already determined 5G is NOT safe. Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment.
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies proving it isn’t unsafe. Doctors and scientists have also asked for a worldwide moratorium on deployment on Earth and in space (see 1, 2). However, risks aren’t isolated to 5G technology.
Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields (aka “Electrosmog”) could lead to health issues in a significant percentage of the population.
Unfortunately, 5G and other sources of wireless continue to be deployed. Doctors and scientists again are asking for independent experts to be given the opportunity to weigh in on this. That seems reasonable, doesn’t it?
From Environmental Health Trust
Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest
Hardell L, Carlberg M. Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest. Oncol Lett. 2020;20(4):15. doi:10.3892/ol.2020.11876
by Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg
Abstract: The fifth generation, 5G, of radiofrequency (RF) radiation is about to be implemented globally without investigating the risks to human health and the environment. This has created debate among concerned individuals in numerous countries. In an appeal to the European Union (EU) in September 2017, currently endorsed by >390 scientists and medical doctors, a moratorium on 5G deployment was requested until proper scientific evaluation of potential negative consequences has been conducted. This request has not been acknowledged by the EU. The evaluation of RF radiation health risks from 5G technology is ignored in a report by a government expert group in Switzerland and a recent publication from The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Conflicts of interest and ties to the industry seem to have contributed to the biased reports. The lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology places populations at risk. Furthermore, there seems to be a cartel of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees, thus reinforcing the no-risk paradigm. We believe that this activity should qualify as scientific misconduct.
Excerpts
“Most politicians and other decision-makers using guidelines for exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation seem to ignore the risks to human health and the environment. The fact that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization (WHO) in May 2011 classified RF radiation in the frequency range of 30 kHz to 300 GHz to be a ‘possible’ human carcinogen, Group 2B (1,2), is being ignored. This has been recently exemplified in a hearing at the Tallinn Parliament in Estonia (3).”
“An important factor may be the influence on politicians by individuals and organizations with inborn conflicts of interests (COIs) and their own agenda in supporting the no-risk paradigm (4,5). The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has repeatedly ignored scientific evidence on adverse effects of RF radiation to humans and the environment. Their guidelines for exposure are based solely on the thermal (heating) paradigm and were first published in ICNIRP 1998 (6), updated in ICNIRP 2009 (7) and have now been newly published in ICNIRP 2020 (8), with no change of concept, only relying on thermal effects from RF radiation on humans. The large amount of peer-reviewed science on non-thermal effects has been ignored in all ICNIRP evaluations (9,10). Additionally, ICNIRP has successfully maintained their obsolete guidelines worldwide.”
Based on the Swiss and ICNIRP experiences, some recommendations can be made. One is to include only unbiased and experienced experts without COIs for evaluation of health risks from RF radiation. All countries should declare a moratorium on 5G until independent research, performed by scientists without any ties to the industry, confirms its safety or not. 2G, 3G, 4G and WiFi are also considered not to be safe, but 5G will be worse regarding harmful biological effects (42,83,84). The authors of the present article recommend an educational campaign to educate the public about the health risks of RF radiation exposure, and safe use of the technology, such as the deployment of wired internet in schools (85), as previously recommended by the European Council resolution 1815 in 2011 (86) and The EMF Scientist Appeal (87). Additionally, it is recommended that the government takes steps to markedly decrease the current exposure of the public to RF radiation, (88,89). Notably, DNA damage has been identified in peripheral blood lymphocytes using the comet assay technique, and in buccal cells using the micronucleus assay, in individuals exposed to RF radiation from base stations (90).
“Finally, an alternative approach to the flawed ICNIRP safety standards may be the comprehensive work of the European Academy for Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM) EMF working group that has resulted in safety recommendations, which are free from the ICNIRP shortcomings (50). Recently, the International Guidelines on Non-Ionising Radiation (IGNIR) have accepted EUROPAEM safety recommendations (91). The Bioinitiative group has recommended similar safety standards based on non-thermal EMF effects (92). WHO and all nations should adopt the EUROPAEM/Bioinitiative/IGNIR safety recommendations, supported by the majority of the scientific community, instead of the obsolete ICNIRP standards.”
“In conclusion, it is important that all experts evaluating scientific evidence and assessing health risks from RF radiation do not have COIs or bias. Being a member of ICNIRP and being funded by the industry directly, or through an industry-funded foundation, constitute clear COIs. Furthermore, it is recommended that the interpretation of results from studies on health effects of RF radiation should take sponsorship from the telecom or other industry into account. It is concluded that the ICNIRP has failed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of health risks associated with RF radiation. The latest ICNIRP publication cannot be used for guidelines on this exposure.”
This paper is an open-access article found here.
Conflicts of interest regarding 5G technology are not uncommon. One of the most embarrassing may be The New York Times partnering with Verizon to create a 5G Journalism Lab. OMG.
Additionally, Frank reported on 135 Doctors in Chile who have asked the health minister for a moratorium on 5G.
There ARE studies that have ALREADY determined 5G is NOT safe. Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums on deployment.
The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies that prove it isn’t unsafe. Doctors and scientists have asked for a worldwide moratorium (see 1, 2). They have also asked their legislators for moratoriums in various countries as well including the U.S, The Netherlands, and now Chile.
From Environmental Health Trust:
More than 130 doctors in Chile ask Health Minister Paris for a moratorium on the deployment of 5G technology
A letter signed by 135 health professionals across Chile has requested a moratorium on the deployment of 5G technology until it is certain that it does not pose a risk to human health and the environment.
READ THE LETTER HERE
“The biological effect of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation, as is the case with 5G technology, has been extensively investigated by independent industry scientists and thousands of studies reliably demonstrate the negative biological effects on human and human health. environment, “the statement said.
The Doctors have proposed “to create a Committee of Experts to analyze independently from economic and political groups, the scientific evidence on the issue of exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic radio frequency waves, in the public health and assess the risks from a scientific point of view that the deployment of 5G technology could bring. ”
They request “that said commission be inter-ministerial with a representative of the Ministry of Sciences (led by Mr. Andrés Couve C.), a member of the Ministry of the Environment (led by Ms. Carolina Schmidt Z.), a member of the Ministry of Transportation and Telecommunications (led by Ms. Gloria Hutt H.) and experts from the Medical College, among others, in order to achieve a qualitatively optimal, coordinated work with an impact on public policy “.
Doctors can sign the 5G appeal at this link. https://uxtr.org/apelacion-chile-5g/
Link to the Letter by Doctors in Chile https://uxtr.org/wp content/uploads/2020/10/Carta_Abierta_Dr._Enrique_Paris_UXTR_VersionFinal_.pdf
Read a news story at https://www.elmostrador.cl/dia/2020/10/06/mas-de-130-medicos-del-pais-piden-al-ministro-paris-moratoria-al-despliegue-de-la-tecnologia-5g/?fbclid=IwAR2Tb3WI1PnHISYziqQUMg_BXQoG36D3Aq3bgGCbmXWoFLP3yktpQntB23E
This petition from France joins numerous official calls to halt 5G. For example:
Since 2018 there have been reports about people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses after 5G was installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4). Last year the World Health Organization warned that high levels of Electromagnetic Fields (aka “Electrosmog”) – including wireless – could lead to health issues in a significant percentage of the population.
Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--Who Are Joe Biden & Kamala Harris?

Who Are Joe Biden & Kamala Harris?

Does anyone ever question Joe Biden ’ s ideology from the past and up to the future ?
How about Kamala Harris and her deep Socialist/Communist affiliation ?
You just have to wonder , where do their real ideologies lie ?
What do they really want for the United States ?
If Joe Biden gets elected , how long after his inauguration will he be found unfit for duty ?
Pelosi is setting that up with the 25th Amendment .
There are so many questions about both of these Socialists , disguised as Democrats , but very few answers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ where his platform lies .
I ’ ll give you a huge hint , it is based upon a Socialistic/Communistic ideology .
The entire Democratic platform is based upon the very radical “ Green New Deal ” with all sorts of Socialist ideology tossed in for good measure that will destroy our freedoms protected under the First Amendment all the way through the Constitution .
It is our hope that you read this article and pass it on now so everyone can see what the former Democratic Party has in mind through their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We begin with some brief ideology Joe Biden displays through his words and actions .
Let ’ s start with what we have from Discover The Networks .
This does not look too bad until the end where he represented the Black Panther Party .
Maybe that is why he has the Antifa web site directly connected to his and accepts money from Act Blue who obtains their money from Black Lives Matter .
Don ’ t believe the connection to Antifa ?
Just go to Antifa.com and see what pops up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Antifa supports Joe Biden .
Maybe that is why he can not denounce them or the BLM group ?
But I digress .
We heard that Joe Biden lost his wife to a drunk driver , at least that is how Joe Biden explained it , but that was not true at all !
Several news outlets made the same statement about the truth on this .
“ For many years thereafter , Biden would claim that his wife and daughter had been killed by a “ drunk driver.
” For example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audience at the University of Delaware : “ It was an errant driver who stopped to drink instead of drive and hit a tractor-trailer , hit my children and my wife and killed them.
” But Biden ’ s claim was false .
Curtis C. Dunn , the man driving the truck that broadsided Mrs. Biden ’ s vehicle , was never charged with drunken driving .
In fact , some investigators thought at the time that the accident had occurred because Biden ’ s wife pulled into the intersection not having noticed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The rumor about alcohol being involved by either party , especially the truck driver , is incorrect , ” said Delaware Superior Court Judge Jerome O. Herlihy , the chief deputy attorney general who worked with crash investigators in 1972 .
Each time Biden uttered his false account of the event , Dunn ’ s family suffered great anguish .
Dunn ’ s daughter , Pamela Hamill , was so disturbed by Biden ’ s false recitation of the events surrounding his wife ’ s death , that she wrote the senator a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ afflicted her father until his death in 1999 .
According to the Newark Post : “ Biden responded in a handwritten note , which , in part , reads , ‘ All that I can say is I am sorry for all of us and please know that neither I or my sons feel any animosity whatsoever.
’ ” But Joe Biden is long on lies and very short on factual , truthful statements .
We thought that maybe Joe Biden was a freedom-loving man , then Newsweek came out with the headline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shows that Democrats are more aligned with the Communist ideology than the free ideology of the United States !
Joe Biden is well-liked by Putin and Putin wants to work with Biden ’ s shared values between the Democrats and Communism !
Is that what our nation needs , a very close tie to Communism ?
Putin Says He Wants to Work With Biden , Claims ‘ Shared Values ’ Between Democrats and Communism By David Brennan On 10/8/20 at 10:05 AM EDT Russian President Vladimir Putin has attempted to mark a positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vice President Joe Biden , and Soviet communists in a wide-ranging interview with the Rossiya TV channel , released Wednesday as the 2020 vice presidential candidates prepared to debate .
The president said the Kremlin would be open to working with whoever sits in the Oval Office in 2021 , despite U.S. intelligence reports indicating that Russia is trying to undermine Biden in the same way it did Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016 .
But Putin linked Biden to communist ideology during the interview .
While Putin—a former party member , KGB @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive terms , his comment lines up with GOP talking points about the Biden-Kamala Harris ticket .
Trump and his allies have tried to frame their opponents proposing a far-left , extremist platform dictated by the progressive wing of the Democratic Party .
“ The Democratic Party is traditionally closer to the so-called liberal values , closer to social democratic ideas , ” Putin said .
“ And it was from the social democratic environment that the Communist Party evolved.
” “ After all , I was a member of the Soviet Communist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ added .
“ I was a rank-and-file member , but it can be said that I believed in the party ’ s ideas .
I still like many of these left-wing values .
Equality and fraternity .
What is bad about them ?
In fact , they are akin to Christian values.
” “ Yes , they are difficult to implement , but they are very attractive , nevertheless .
In other words , this can be seen as an ideological basis for developing contacts with the Democratic representative.
” Putin also reminisced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ support for African-American civil rights struggle .
American racial inequality will play a central role in the coming election .
Trump has been widely criticized for dismissing the concerns of Black voters and tacitly endorsing violent white supremacist groups .
Trump and his allies have tried to characterize the Black Lives Matter movement , for example , as an extremist and even terrorist organization .
Putin said Black Americans “ constitute a stable electorate ” in favor of the Democrats .
“ The Soviet Union also supported the African Americans ’ movement for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Back in the 1930s , Communist International leaders wrote that both black and white workers had a common enemy–imperialism and capitalism .
They also wrote that these people could become the most effective group in the future revolutionary battle.
” “ So , this is something that can be seen , to a degree , as common values , if not a unifying agent for us , ” Putin said .
“ People of my generation remember a time when huge portraits of Angela Davis , a member of the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the rights of African Americans , were on view around the Soviet Union.
” FBI Director Christopher Wray confirmed in September that Russia is spreading disinformation to “ denigrate ” Biden ahead of the election .
American intelligence agencies and lawmakers—including a Republican-led Senate committee—have confirmed extensive contact between Trump ’ s 2016 campaign and Moscow , including multiple individuals linked to Russian intelligence .
Trump and Putin have repeatedly dismissed such reports—the former branding them “ fake news ” —as an effort to undermine Trump ’ s presidency and damage ties between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also pointed out to Rossiya a specific arena where he would be ready to work with a Biden administration , despite the former vice president vowing to address Russian meddling and aggressive foreign policy—promises Putin described as “ sharp anti-Russia rhetoric.
” “ Candidate Biden has said openly that he was ready to extend the New START or to sign a new strategic offensive reductions treaty , ” Putin said , referring to the landmark nuclear arms control accord that is due to lapse next year .
“ This is already a very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The Trump administration has thus far refused offers to extend the deal , saying it wants China included in any new nuclear arms deals .
“ I would like to repeat what I have said more than once before .
We will work with any future president of the United States , the one whom the American people give their vote of confidence , ” Putin said .
Yep , Communist Putin is hoping to work with Joe Biden in their shared Communist ideologies !
Is this really the man we want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ran an article dealing with Joe Biden and his connection to the “ Socialist ‘ Great Reset ’ movement .
“ A radical movement called the Great Reset embraced by some Democrats poses a grave threat to liberty and free markets in the United States and around the world .
While former Vice President Joe Biden hasn ’ t endorsed the movement , his ties to it are growing as he changes his long-held policy views to appease the far-left .
While it hasn ’ t gained widespread attention , the Great Reset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and individual rights since the collapse of the Soviet Union .
What is the Great Reset ?
Simply put , it ’ s a growing movement backed by many of the world ’ s most powerful business leaders , government officials and left-wing activists that aims to “ push the reset button ” on the global economy .
t would destroy the current capitalist system and replace it with progressive and modern socialist systems , with a special emphasis placed on eco-socialist policies like those contained in the Green New Deal .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to China , must participate [ in the Great Reset ] , and every industry , from oil and gas to tech , must be transformed .
In short , we need a ‘ Great Reset ’ of capitalism , ” wrote Klaus Schwab , the head of the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) , in a recent article for WEF ’ s website .
Policy ideas offered by “ Great Reset ” advocates include government-provided basic income programs , universal health care , massive tax increases and the Green New Deal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and international figures like Prince Charles are currently leading the campaign for a Great Reset .
For example , at a campaign event on July 9 , Biden said we need to end the “ era of shareholder capitalism , ” a major part of the Great Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated , elevating social justice causes and climate change concerns over property rights.
” Here , we clearly see that Joe Biden is supporting the Green New Deal and the Socialist movement that goes with that .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just a shell and a puppet for the extreme left Socialists/Communists that have taken control of the Democratic Party with their ” Green New Deal , ” eliminating all forms of oil , getting rid of gasoline cars and a host of other ideas that will destroy our nations economic structure and usher in a Socialist/Communist ideology that eliminates the very Constitution we all love so dearly .
But Joe Biden is not going to finish his term should he be elected .
He will be found incapable of holding office due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kamala Harris takes over and she is much worse than Joe Biden could ever be .
Let us now look at Kamala Harris .
We go to the link below to find some interesting ideas about Kamala Harris .
Kamala Harris is shown as a progressive , which is by all standards a code name for Socialist .
Kamala Harris has ties to a number of Socialists and Communists .
Below we show just one instance where she supported Fred Ross , Sr. who was trained by the Communist Saul Alinsky .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ honor Ross are like the Who ’ s Who of the Communist/Socialist anti-United States crowd .
Nearly everyone on that list are or have been members of the Socialist , ( progressive ) , Communist groups and this is just a minor link to her “ Progressive ” links because she is aligned in principal to these Socialist ideologies .
Note above that she has close ties to Maxine Waters , a lady very deeply entrenched in the Socialist Party with connections to the Communist Party .
Why does Kamala Harris need a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the good of the United States in mind ?
Now , let us get to gun control .
Kamala Harris does not believe the Second Amendment applies to the public .
Like Joe Biden , Kamala Harris does not believe the Second Amendment applies to individuals !
But she does believe that illegal aliens have rights !
Note below .
Back in January , jaws dropped when presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris ( D-CA ) admitted at a CNN town hall that she wanted to take away the existing health arrangements of hundreds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know one reason why .
In another interview with CNN that aired Sunday , Harris admitted that she wants to provide taxpayer-funded health care , along with education and other benefits , to individuals unlawfully present in this country .
But as even Hillary Clinton recognized , doing so wouldn ’ t just cost precious taxpayer dollars .
It will also encourage individuals to migrate to the United States for “ free ” health care .
In the interview , CNN ’ s Jake Tapper asked Harris about language in Section 102 ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ single-payer bills , which would make health coverage available to all individuals present in the United States , regardless of their legal status .
When questioned whether she supported granting benefits “ to people who are in this country illegally , ” Harris responded unequivocally that she does : “ Let me just be very clear about this .
I am opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human being from access to public safety , public education or public health , period.
” Compare Harris ’ response to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton .
When testifying before Congress about her health-care task force ’ s plan in September 1993 , Clinton said she opposed extending benefits to “ illegal aliens , ” because it would encourage additional migration to the United States : We do not think the comprehensive health care benefits should be extended to those who are undocumented workers and illegal aliens .
We do not want to do anything to encourage more illegal immigration into this country .
We know now that too many people come in for medical care , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t want them having the same benefits that American citizens are entitled to have .
Both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris would destroy the United States , limit the First Amendment , eliminate the Second Amendment , and basically destroy what is left of the Constitution after that .
Both of them want to stop the use of all fossil fuels even though the United States has more than the entire world .
Both also want to get rid of power plants that use any sort of fossil fuels and convert to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which can not maintain the power our nation needs ; and California is a bright light of how they can not keep power on with solar and wind !
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will , if elected , change the number of Supreme Court Justices even though they refuse to make that statement .
Joe Biden shows signs of dementia and has stated twice that he is proud to be running for Senate !
Nancy Pelosi knows that is a fact and that is why she is working to use the 25th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they will allow Joe Biden to be sworn in and within a very short period of time , she will call for the removal of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will become president and the loss of freedom and the destruction of the United States will begin .
We have shown but a very small part of these two and what will happen should Joe Biden be elected .
Do some research on your own from all over and be sure to look deep for the links to Socialism/Communism , they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these types of individuals to ruin our nation .
If we vote from bottom to top Republican , we maintain our nation and our freedom .
If we allow the Socialists , disguised as Democrats , to win , our nation will not look like a free nation and will slide into that marsh of Socialism and fail much like many nations that tried the Socialism way .
Our nation should drive the point to all these Socialists/Communists/Marxists/Democrats and let them know by a margin they can not overcome that “ WE THE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and not the Socialistic one Joe Biden/Kamala Harris want !
It is up to us , and if we fail this election , it may well be the last !
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Does anyone ever question Joe Biden’s ideology from the past and up to the future? How about Kamala Harris and her deep Socialist/Communist affiliation? You just have to wonder, where do their real ideologies lie? What do they really want for the United States? If Joe Biden gets elected, how long after his inauguration will he be found unfit for duty? Pelosi is setting that up with the 25th Amendment. There are so many questions about both of these Socialists, disguised as Democrats, but very few answers. Let us begin with Joe Biden and where his platform lies. I’ll give you a huge hint, it is based upon a Socialistic/Communistic ideology. The entire Democratic platform is based upon the very radical “Green New Deal” with all sorts of Socialist ideology tossed in for good measure that will destroy our freedoms protected under the First Amendment all the way through the Constitution. It is our hope that you read this article and pass it on now so everyone can see what the former Democratic Party has in mind through their puppets, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
We begin with some brief ideology Joe Biden displays through his words and actions.
Let’s start with what we have from Discover The Networks.
“Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. was born in November 1942 in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and lived there for ten years before moving to, and growing up in, New Castle County, Delaware. He graduated from Archmere Academy in Claymont, Delaware in 1961. In 1965 he earned his undergraduate degree (with majors in history and political science) from the University of Delaware in Newark, and in 1968 he earned his Juris Doctor degree from Syracuse University College of Law. Biden then found work as a public defender in Wilmington, Delaware. He also spent some time working as an attorney for a member of the Black Panther Party.”
This does not look too bad until the end where he represented the Black Panther Party. Maybe that is why he has the Antifa web site directly connected to his and accepts money from Act Blue who obtains their money from Black Lives Matter. Don’t believe the connection to Antifa? Just go to Antifa.com and see what pops up. It’s nice to know that Antifa supports Joe Biden. Maybe that is why he cannot denounce them or the BLM group? But I digress.
We heard that Joe Biden lost his wife to a drunk driver, at least that is how Joe Biden explained it, but that was not true at all! Several news outlets made the same statement about the truth on this.
“For many years thereafter, Biden would claim that his wife and daughter had been killed by a “drunk driver.” For example, in mid-September 2001 he told an audience at the University of Delaware: “It was an errant driver who stopped to drink instead of drive and hit a tractor-trailer, hit my children and my wife and killed them.” But Biden’s claim was false. Curtis C. Dunn, the man driving the truck that broadsided Mrs. Biden’s vehicle, was never charged with drunken driving. In fact, some investigators thought at the time that the accident had occurred because Biden’s wife pulled into the intersection not having noticed Dunn’s approaching truck. “The rumor about alcohol being involved by either party, especially the truck driver, is incorrect,” said Delaware Superior Court Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, the chief deputy attorney general who worked with crash investigators in 1972. Each time Biden uttered his false account of the event, Dunn’s family suffered great anguish. Dunn’s daughter, Pamela Hamill, was so disturbed by Biden’s false recitation of the events surrounding his wife’s death, that she wrote the senator a letter expressing the profound grief that had afflicted her father until his death in 1999. According to the Newark Post: “Biden responded in a handwritten note, which, in part, reads, ‘All that I can say is I am sorry for all of us and please know that neither I or my sons feel any animosity whatsoever.’”
But Joe Biden is long on lies and very short on factual, truthful statements.
When Biden ran for the Senate in 1972, an election which he won by a margin of by just 1.4 percent, he supported busing as a public policy. But as it became increasingly clear that the vast majority of Biden’s majority-white constituents passionately opposed the policy, the senator reversed his position. In September 1975, for instance, he supported a federal anti-busing amendment proposed by Senator Jesse Helms of North Carolina, a former segregationist. Later that same month, Biden also supported an amendment introduced by Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, to forbid the busing of children to any school other than the one nearest to their homes. In a September 1975 interview with the Washington Post, Biden boasted about the love and respect that Delaware’s black community felt for him: “I still walk down the street in the black side of town. Mousey and Chops and all the boys at 13th, and — I can walk in those pool halls, and quite frankly don’t know another white man involved in Delaware politics who can do that kind of thing.”
We thought that maybe Joe Biden was a freedom-loving man, then Newsweek came out with the headline below! Read this well since it shows that Democrats are more aligned with the Communist ideology than the free ideology of the United States! Joe Biden is well-liked by Putin and Putin wants to work with Biden’s shared values between the Democrats and Communism! Is that what our nation needs, a very close tie to Communism?
Putin Says He Wants to Work With Biden, Claims ‘Shared Values’ Between Democrats and Communism By David Brennan On 10/8/20 at 10:05 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-says-wants-work-joe-biden-claims-shared-values-between-democrats-communism-1537501 Russian President Vladimir Putin has attempted to mark a positive resemblance between Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden, and Soviet communists in a wide-ranging interview with the Rossiya TV channel, released Wednesday as the 2020 vice presidential candidates prepared to debate. The president said the Kremlin would be open to working with whoever sits in the Oval Office in 2021, despite U.S. intelligence reports indicating that Russia is trying to undermine Biden in the same way it did Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016. But Putin linked Biden to communist ideology during the interview. While Putin—a former party member, KGB colonel and intelligence operative—made the comparison in positive terms, his comment lines up with GOP talking points about the Biden-Kamala Harris ticket. Trump and his allies have tried to frame their opponents proposing a far-left, extremist platform dictated by the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. “The Democratic Party is traditionally closer to the so-called liberal values, closer to social democratic ideas,” Putin said. “And it was from the social democratic environment that the Communist Party evolved.” “After all, I was a member of the Soviet Communist Party for nearly 20 years” Putin added. “I was a rank-and-file member, but it can be said that I believed in the party’s ideas. I still like many of these left-wing values. Equality and fraternity. What is bad about them? In fact, they are akin to Christian values.” “Yes, they are difficult to implement, but they are very attractive, nevertheless. In other words, this can be seen as an ideological basis for developing contacts with the Democratic representative.” Putin also reminisced on the Soviet Union’s rhetorical support for African-American civil rights struggle. American racial inequality will play a central role in the coming election. Trump has been widely criticized for dismissing the concerns of Black voters and tacitly endorsing violent white supremacist groups. Trump and his allies have tried to characterize the Black Lives Matter movement, for example, as an extremist and even terrorist organization. Putin said Black Americans “constitute a stable electorate” in favor of the Democrats. “The Soviet Union also supported the African Americans’ movement for their legitimate rights,” he said. “Back in the 1930s, Communist International leaders wrote that both black and white workers had a common enemy–imperialism and capitalism. They also wrote that these people could become the most effective group in the future revolutionary battle.” “So, this is something that can be seen, to a degree, as common values, if not a unifying agent for us,” Putin said. “People of my generation remember a time when huge portraits of Angela Davis, a member of the U.S. Communist Party and an ardent fighter for the rights of African Americans, were on view around the Soviet Union.” FBI Director Christopher Wray confirmed in September that Russia is spreading disinformation to “denigrate” Biden ahead of the election. American intelligence agencies and lawmakers—including a Republican-led Senate committee—have confirmed extensive contact between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Moscow, including multiple individuals linked to Russian intelligence. Trump and Putin have repeatedly dismissed such reports—the former branding them “fake news”—as an effort to undermine Trump’s presidency and damage ties between Washington, D.C. and Moscow.” Putin also pointed out to Rossiya a specific arena where he would be ready to work with a Biden administration, despite the former vice president vowing to address Russian meddling and aggressive foreign policy—promises Putin described as “sharp anti-Russia rhetoric.” “Candidate Biden has said openly that he was ready to extend the New START or to sign a new strategic offensive reductions treaty,” Putin said, referring to the landmark nuclear arms control accord that is due to lapse next year. “This is already a very significant element of our potential future cooperation.” The Trump administration has thus far refused offers to extend the deal, saying it wants China included in any new nuclear arms deals. “I would like to repeat what I have said more than once before. We will work with any future president of the United States, the one whom the American people give their vote of confidence,” Putin said.
Yep, Communist Putin is hoping to work with Joe Biden in their shared Communist ideologies! Is this really the man we want to lead our nation? Fox Business ran an article dealing with Joe Biden and his connection to the “Socialist ‘Great Reset’ movement.
Then, from Fox News:
“A radical movement called the Great Reset embraced by some Democrats poses a grave threat to liberty and free markets in the United States and around the world. While former Vice President Joe Biden hasn’t endorsed the movement, his ties to it are growing as he changes his long-held policy views to appease the far-left. While it hasn’t gained widespread attention, the Great Reset is perhaps the biggest danger to capitalism and individual rights since the collapse of the Soviet Union. What is the Great Reset? Simply put, it’s a growing movement backed by many of the world’s most powerful business leaders, government officials and left-wing activists that aims to “push the reset button” on the global economy. t would destroy the current capitalist system and replace it with progressive and modern socialist systems, with a special emphasis placed on eco-socialist policies like those contained in the Green New Deal. “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate [in the Great Reset], and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism,” wrote Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum (WEF), in a recent article for WEF’s website. Policy ideas offered by “Great Reset” advocates include government-provided basic income programs, universal health care, massive tax increases and the Green New Deal. Schwab, the World Economic Forum and international figures like Prince Charles are currently leading the campaign for a Great Reset. For example, at a campaign event on July 9, Biden said we need to end the “era of shareholder capitalism,” a major part of the Great Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated, elevating social justice causes and climate change concerns over property rights.”
Here, we clearly see that Joe Biden is supporting the Green New Deal and the Socialist movement that goes with that. We have to understand that Joe Biden is just a shell and a puppet for the extreme left Socialists/Communists that have taken control of the Democratic Party with their ”Green New Deal,” eliminating all forms of oil, getting rid of gasoline cars and a host of other ideas that will destroy our nations economic structure and usher in a Socialist/Communist ideology that eliminates the very Constitution we all love so dearly. But Joe Biden is not going to finish his term should he be elected. He will be found incapable of holding office due to his ever-increasing dementia, at which time Kamala Harris takes over and she is much worse than Joe Biden could ever be.
Let us now look at Kamala Harris.
We go to the link below to find some interesting ideas about Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris is shown as a progressive, which is by all standards a code name for Socialist. Kamala Harris has ties to a number of Socialists and Communists. Below we show just one instance where she supported Fred Ross, Sr. who was trained by the Communist Saul Alinsky. The list shown below that talked Obama to honor Ross are like the Who’s Who of the Communist/Socialist anti-United States crowd. Nearly everyone on that list are or have been members of the Socialist, (progressive), Communist groups and this is just a minor link to her “Progressive” links because she is aligned in principal to these Socialist ideologies.
From Discover The Networks:
Note above that she has close ties to Maxine Waters, a lady very deeply entrenched in the Socialist Party with connections to the Communist Party. Why does Kamala Harris need a Socialist/Communist to help her if she has the good of the United States in mind?
Now, let us get to gun control. Kamala Harris does not believe the Second Amendment applies to the public.
Rejecting the Individual’s Right to Gun Ownership As district attorney in 2008, Harris filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller. She argued that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual’s right to own a gun.
Like Joe Biden, Kamala Harris does not believe the Second Amendment applies to individuals! But she does believe that illegal aliens have rights! Note below.
Back in January, jaws dropped when presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) admitted at a CNN town hall that she wanted to take away the existing health arrangements of hundreds of millions of Americans. Now we know one reason why. In another interview with CNN that aired Sunday, Harris admitted that she wants to provide taxpayer-funded health care, along with education and other benefits, to individuals unlawfully present in this country. But as even Hillary Clinton recognized, doing so wouldn’t just cost precious taxpayer dollars. It will also encourage individuals to migrate to the United States for “free” health care. In the interview, CNN’s Jake Tapper asked Harris about language in Section 102(a) of the House and Senate single-payer bills, which would make health coverage available to all individuals present in the United States, regardless of their legal status. When questioned whether she supported granting benefits “to people who are in this country illegally,” Harris responded unequivocally that she does: “Let me just be very clear about this. I am opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human being from access to public safety, public education or public health, period.” Compare Harris’ response to the words of none other than Hillary Clinton. When testifying before Congress about her health-care task force’s plan in September 1993, Clinton said she opposed extending benefits to “illegal aliens,” because it would encourage additional migration to the United States: We do not think the comprehensive health care benefits should be extended to those who are undocumented workers and illegal aliens. We do not want to do anything to encourage more illegal immigration into this country. We know now that too many people come in for medical care, as it is. We certainly don’t want them having the same benefits that American citizens are entitled to have.
Both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris would destroy the United States, limit the First Amendment, eliminate the Second Amendment, and basically destroy what is left of the Constitution after that. Both of them want to stop the use of all fossil fuels even though the United States has more than the entire world. Both also want to get rid of power plants that use any sort of fossil fuels and convert to the nearly useless wind and solar both of which cannot maintain the power our nation needs; and California is a bright light of how they cannot keep power on with solar and wind!
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will, if elected, change the number of Supreme Court Justices even though they refuse to make that statement. Joe Biden shows signs of dementia and has stated twice that he is proud to be running for Senate! Nancy Pelosi knows that is a fact and that is why she is working to use the 25th Amendment. So, should Democrats win, they will allow Joe Biden to be sworn in and within a very short period of time, she will call for the removal of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will become president and the loss of freedom and the destruction of the United States will begin.
We have shown but a very small part of these two and what will happen should Joe Biden be elected. Do some research on your own from all over and be sure to look deep for the links to Socialism/Communism, they are there and our nation does not need these types of individuals to ruin our nation. If we vote from bottom to top Republican, we maintain our nation and our freedom. If we allow the Socialists, disguised as Democrats, to win, our nation will not look like a free nation and will slide into that marsh of Socialism and fail much like many nations that tried the Socialism way.
Our nation should drive the point to all these Socialists/Communists/Marxists/Democrats and let them know by a margin they cannot overcome that “WE THE PEOPLE” want a free United States and not the Socialistic one Joe Biden/Kamala Harris want!
It is up to us, and if we fail this election, it may well be the last!
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media