thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--City Sends Mental Health Experts To 911 Calls Instead Of Cops & It’s Worked 100% Of The Time

As TFTP has previously reported , the Virginia-based Treatment Advocacy Center , an organization dedicated to eliminating the barriers faced by those with severe mental illnesses , released a jaw-dropping report in regard to police interactions with the mentally ill .
In their report titled , Overlooked in the Undercounted : The Role of Mental Illness in Fatal Law Enforcement Encounters , researchers discovered that people with an untreated mental illness are 16 times more likely to be killed during an interaction with police than anyone else .
According to the study , by all accounts – official and unofficial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fatal police encounters ends the life of an individual with severe mental illness .
This startling number highlights a critical problem with police and how they handle incidents with the mentally ill and it explains why so many people who simply need help , receive bullets instead .
“ If this were any other medical condition , people would be up in arms , ” John Snook , the report ’ s co-author and executive director of the Treatment Advocacy Center said .
One would assume that since these numbers are so great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ training their officers to interact with the mentally ill .
However , one would be wrong .
Even cops who voluntarily attend Crisis Intervention Training ( CIT ) , have shown that they are quick to the trigger when dealing with the mentally ill. As the Free Thought Project has pointed out in the past , the overwhelming majority of time spent by police during training is devoted to shooting their weapons .
Very little time is set aside for training in de-escalation tactics , and most departments receive zero training in dealing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of unarmed and often completely innocent mentally ill people killed by police is immense .
TFTP archives are full of tragic stories in which police were called to help someone in a crisis and end up murdering them .
People are killed even when they aren ’ t in a crisis and simply act differently like Elijah McClain , who was on his way home from buying groceries and was murdered by police because he was an introvert and wore a ski mask .
Instead of attempting to save the sinking ship that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , some municipalities are thinking outside of the box .
Denver , Colorado is one such place .
After the George Floyd protests sparked the debate the problem of police killing the mentally ill was pushed to the forefront of the conversation and many municipalities like Denver asked the question , should trained gunman , whose only tool is violent escalation , be the first line of response to those in a mental health crisis ?
The obvious answer to that question is no .
The overwhelming majority of calls involving mentally ill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why on Earth would we send in armed state agents to address them ?
On June 1 , Denver began the Support Team Assistance Response ( STAR ) program , which sends a mental health professional and a paramedic to some 911 calls instead of cops .
According to their latest data , STAR has responded to nearly 400 calls to 911 in which police would have normally been sent out .
The STAR team — armed only with experience and compassion — has never once called police to back them up .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ killing someone , beating them , ruining their lives , or using violence .
Imagine that .
“ We ’ re really trying to create true alternatives to us using police and jails , ” said Vinnie Cervantes with Denver Alliance for Street Health Response , one of the organizations that helped start the program .
“ It really kind of proves that we ’ ve been working for the right thing , and that these ideas are getting the recognition they should , ” Cervantes said .
This situation is a win-win @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so they can focus on actual crimes like rape , theft , and violence .
“ It ’ s the future of law enforcement , taking a public health view on public safety , ” Denver Police Chief Paul Pazen said .
“ We want to meet people where they are and address those needs and address those needs outside of the criminal justice system.
” Carleigh Sailon from the Mental Health Center of Denver — who has responded to many of these calls , spoke to lx.com last week to explain the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have called for help or to report someone slumped against a fence , camped out on private property , or simply talking to themselves , are impressed when the STAR team shows up and resolves the problem without tasering , choking , or shooting anyone .
“ We ’ ve gotten great feedback from the community , from individuals who ’ ve said that this felt really comfortable , really supportive , that we were able to show up and offer other solutions that were really helpful in that moment , ” Sailon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just overwhelmingly positive and very accepting of the options that we have to offer .
And kind of surprised , I think , too , that a social worker and a medic kind of hop out of this van in street clothes and are there to help vs. police or an ambulance.
” When we hear catch phrases like “ defund the police , ” this is what it ’ s about .
The apologist crowd says things like , “ let me know how it turns out when you send a social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in an attempt to discredit this movement but as more cities like Denver continue to show a 100 % non-violent success record , that crowd looks sillier and sillier .
The idea of a state function shifting its focus from violence to compassion is revolutionary on many fronts .
While a 100 % success record nationwide is unlikely , it is obvious that this is the direction in which we need to head .

As TFTP has previously reported, the Virginia-based Treatment Advocacy Center, an organization dedicated to eliminating the barriers faced by those with severe mental illnesses, released a jaw-dropping report in regard to police interactions with the mentally ill. In their report titled, Overlooked in the Undercounted: The Role of Mental Illness in Fatal Law Enforcement Encounters, researchers discovered that people with an untreated mental illness are 16 times more likely to be killed during an interaction with police than anyone else.
According to the study, by all accounts – official and unofficial – a minimum of 1 in 4 fatal police encounters ends the life of an individual with severe mental illness.
Where official government data regarding police shootings and mental illness have been analyzed – in one U.S. city and several other Western countries – the findings indicate that mental health disorders are a factor in as many as 1 in 2 fatal law enforcement encounters.
This startling number highlights a critical problem with police and how they handle incidents with the mentally ill and it explains why so many people who simply need help, receive bullets instead.
“If this were any other medical condition, people would be up in arms,” John Snook, the report’s co-author and executive director of the Treatment Advocacy Center said.
One would assume that since these numbers are so great, police have taken action and are training their officers to interact with the mentally ill. However, one would be wrong. Even cops who voluntarily attend Crisis Intervention Training (CIT), have shown that they are quick to the trigger when dealing with the mentally ill.
As the Free Thought Project has pointed out in the past, the overwhelming majority of time spent by police during training is devoted to shooting their weapons. Very little time is set aside for training in de-escalation tactics, and most departments receive zero training in dealing with the mentally ill.
The list of unarmed and often completely innocent mentally ill people killed by police is immense. TFTP archives are full of tragic stories in which police were called to help someone in a crisis and end up murdering them. People are killed even when they aren’t in a crisis and simply act differently like Elijah McClain, who was on his way home from buying groceries and was murdered by police because he was an introvert and wore a ski mask.
Instead of attempting to save the sinking ship that is cops responding to mental health crises, some municipalities are thinking outside of the box. Denver, Colorado is one such place. After the George Floyd protests sparked the debate the problem of police killing the mentally ill was pushed to the forefront of the conversation and many municipalities like Denver asked the question, should trained gunman, whose only tool is violent escalation, be the first line of response to those in a mental health crisis?
The obvious answer to that question is no. The overwhelming majority of calls involving mentally ill people do not involve crimes, so why on Earth would we send in armed state agents to address them?
On June 1, Denver began the Support Team Assistance Response (STAR) program, which sends a mental health professional and a paramedic to some 911 calls instead of cops. According to their latest data, STAR has responded to nearly 400 calls to 911 in which police would have normally been sent out. The STAR team — armed only with experience and compassion — has never once called police to back them up.
They have settled every single call without killing someone, beating them, ruining their lives, or using violence. Imagine that.
“We’re really trying to create true alternatives to us using police and jails,” said Vinnie Cervantes with Denver Alliance for Street Health Response, one of the organizations that helped start the program.
“It really kind of proves that we’ve been working for the right thing, and that these ideas are getting the recognition they should,” Cervantes said.
This situation is a win-win as it also frees up police time so they can focus on actual crimes like rape, theft, and violence.
“It’s the future of law enforcement, taking a public health view on public safety,” Denver Police Chief Paul Pazen said. “We want to meet people where they are and address those needs and address those needs outside of the criminal justice system.”
Carleigh Sailon from the Mental Health Center of Denver — who has responded to many of these calls, spoke to lx.com last week to explain the program’s success.
Those who have called for help or to report someone slumped against a fence, camped out on private property, or simply talking to themselves, are impressed when the STAR team shows up and resolves the problem without tasering, choking, or shooting anyone.
“We’ve gotten great feedback from the community, from individuals who’ve said that this felt really comfortable, really supportive, that we were able to show up and offer other solutions that were really helpful in that moment,” Sailon told lx.com. “People have been just overwhelmingly positive and very accepting of the options that we have to offer. And kind of surprised, I think, too, that a social worker and a medic kind of hop out of this van in street clothes and are there to help vs. police or an ambulance.”
When we hear catch phrases like “defund the police,” this is what it’s about. The apologist crowd says things like, “let me know how it turns out when you send a social worker to deal with a violent criminal” in an attempt to discredit this movement but as more cities like Denver continue to show a 100% non-violent success record, that crowd looks sillier and sillier.
The idea of a state function shifting its focus from violence to compassion is revolutionary on many fronts. While a 100% success record nationwide is unlikely, it is obvious that this is the direction in which we need to head.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--French authorities: Muslim who killed man for Muhammad cartoons may not be ‘radicalized,’ may have ‘

French authorities : Muslim who killed man for Muhammad cartoons may not be ‘ radicalized , ’ may have ‘ another motive ’ The man screamed “ Allahu akbar ” and beheaded his victim in accord with Qur ’ an 47:4 .
The victim had received death threats for days before the murder , all in connection with his showing Muhammad cartoons to his class .
The willful ignorance here is absolutely staggering .
“ Teacher beheaded in Paris suburb after showing cartoons of Prophet Mohammed to class , ” by David Chazan , Telegraph , October 16 , 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history teacher who showed his pupils cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed in class was beheaded near his school in a Paris suburb on Friday by a suspected Islamist terrorist who shouted “ Allahu Akbar ” , police said .
Alerted by local residents , police confronted and shot dead a man armed with a kitchen knife and an air gun who refused to drop his weapons and surrender , and threatened them .
Minutes later , officers found the body of 47-year-old Samuel Paty , a history and geography teacher .
A bomb @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether the presumed assailant was wearing a suicide vest or belt .
Witnesses told police they heard the assailant shouting “ Allahu Akbar ” [ ‘ God is the greatest ’ in Arabic ] , police sources said… .
The investigation is being directed by specialised anti-terrorism prosecutors .
“ There are still questions about whether the killer was radicalised or whether there might have been another motive , but the investigation will clarify this and the working hypothesis is terrorism , ” the source said .
An investigation has been launched into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group ” and “ membership of a criminal terrorist group ” .
The presumed killer , a Moscow-born ethnic Chechen , was not on France ’ s terror watch list but was known to police for petty crime… .
Xavier Bertrand , centre-Right president of the Hauts-de-France region , said : “ Islamist barbarity has taken aim at one of the symbols of the Republic : school .
The terrorists want to shut us up , to bring us to our knees .
They should know that we will not bend , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ write , draw , think , teach.
” Marine Le Pen of the far-Right National Rally , said : “ A teacher beheaded for showing Charlie Hebdo caricatures .
We are in France with this level of unbearable barbarity .
Islamism is waging war on us : it is by force that we must drive them out of our country.
” …

French authorities: Muslim who killed man for Muhammad cartoons may not be ‘radicalized,’ may have ‘another motive’
The man screamed “Allahu akbar” and beheaded his victim in accord with Qur’an 47:4. The victim had received death threats for days before the murder, all in connection with his showing Muhammad cartoons to his class. The willful ignorance here is absolutely staggering.
“Teacher beheaded in Paris suburb after showing cartoons of Prophet Mohammed to class,” by David Chazan, Telegraph, October 16, 2020 (thanks to Darcy):
A history teacher who showed his pupils cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed in class was beheaded near his school in a Paris suburb on Friday by a suspected Islamist terrorist who shouted “Allahu Akbar”, police said.
Alerted by local residents, police confronted and shot dead a man armed with a kitchen knife and an air gun who refused to drop his weapons and surrender, and threatened them.
Minutes later, officers found the body of 47-year-old Samuel Paty, a history and geography teacher.
A bomb disposal unit was called in to check whether the presumed assailant was wearing a suicide vest or belt.
Witnesses told police they heard the assailant shouting “Allahu Akbar” [‘God is the greatest’ in Arabic], police sources said….
The investigation is being directed by specialised anti-terrorism prosecutors.
“There are still questions about whether the killer was radicalised or whether there might have been another motive, but the investigation will clarify this and the working hypothesis is terrorism,” the source said.
An investigation has been launched into “murder in relation to a terrorist group” and “membership of a criminal terrorist group”.
The presumed killer, a Moscow-born ethnic Chechen, was not on France’s terror watch list but was known to police for petty crime….
Xavier Bertrand, centre-Right president of the Hauts-de-France region, said: “Islamist barbarity has taken aim at one of the symbols of the Republic: school. The terrorists want to shut us up, to bring us to our knees. They should know that we will not bend, they will never forbid us to read, write, draw, think, teach.”
Marine Le Pen of the far-Right National Rally, said: “A teacher beheaded for showing Charlie Hebdo caricatures. We are in France with this level of unbearable barbarity. Islamism is waging war on us: it is by force that we must drive them out of our country.”…
Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--Florida:  Officers Fired After Forcing Two Mentally Ill Women To Give Birth Alone In Jail Cells

Broward County , FL — Last year , as TFTP reported , Tammy Jackson was pregnant and in solitary confinement for a trespassing charge—unable to pay her own bail—when she went into labor .
Her cries for help went unanswered by officers at the jail , and as a result , she gave birth by herself , and her daughter Miranda spent her first moments on Earth in a dark concrete room designed to hold serial killers .
The fact that a mother gave birth by herself in a concrete cell is horrifying and one would think that the Broward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ action to make sure it never happened again .
However , one would be wrong .
Last month , another mentally ill woman was forced to give birth to her son in a jail cell , according to a letter sent to Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony by the Broward Public Defender ’ s Office .
“ She was denied the dignity of a hospital bed and the assistance of a physician , ” according to the letter , signed by Executive Chief Assistant Public Defender Gordon H. Weekes Jr. “ The repeated and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a laboring , mentally ill mother is of grave concern.
” Imagine for a moment that this exact same jail made national headlines last year for this very same thing and they are so callous and reckless that they would do it again a year later after no one was held accountable .
Well , that is exactly what happened .
Because this was the second time it happened , Sheriff Troy could no longer ignore the horrifying negligence of his top brass .
The Miami Herald reports that the sheriff ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Angela Neely Thursday after an administrative review of the circumstances surrounding the birth .
“ I conducted a review of the matter and determined that command level failures occurred by Colonel Palmer and Lieutenant Colonel Neely in this case , ” Sheriff Tony said in a statement .
“ They grossly failed this agency and this inmate.
” The mentally ill woman was arrested after she was caught on someone ’ s home security footage walking around in their home .
She had harmed no one and was in dire need of mental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help , however , she was kidnapped and put in a concrete and steal cage on Sept. 6 as her baby boy grew inside of her for 3 more weeks .
The mentally ill woman gave birth on Sept. 27 .
Medical records show the woman was complaining about contractions and labor pains more than 12 hours before giving birth that day — but she was ignored .
The despicable irony of this case is that it took place just three months after the state enacted the Tammy Jackson Healthy Pregnancies for Incarcerated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop this very thing from happening .
This goes to show how useless laws are that attempt to rein in police incompetence and cruelty .
Despite lambasting the top brass for forcing this latest victim to give birth alone in a cell , Weekes stopped short of claiming their actions were criminal , despite them clearly violating the constitution .
The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads as follows : Excessive bail shall not be required , nor excessive fines imposed , nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted .
Here at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ women to deliver their own babies alone in concrete rooms is excessively cruel .
“ In my opinion , the law established a certain spirit of how woman should be treated , with dignity , ” Weekes said .
“ The law does not contain provisions for what would happen if an agency violates it , but an inmate would probably be able to bring a civil case , ” Weekes said .
So , instead of actually holding the cops responsible for violating their oaths to the constitution , Weekes suggests asking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After being forced to give birth in jail , the woman was ordered released as her crime didn ’ t amount to the time she spent in jail .
Though she was released , her child was then taken from her and given to the Department of Children and Families .
A sad story all around .

Broward County, FL — Last year, as TFTP reported, Tammy Jackson was pregnant and in solitary confinement for a trespassing charge—unable to pay her own bail—when she went into labor. Her cries for help went unanswered by officers at the jail, and as a result, she gave birth by herself, and her daughter Miranda spent her first moments on Earth in a dark concrete room designed to hold serial killers.
The fact that a mother gave birth by herself in a concrete cell is horrifying and one would think that the Broward County Sheriff’s office would take action to make sure it never happened again. However, one would be wrong.
Last month, another mentally ill woman was forced to give birth to her son in a jail cell, according to a letter sent to Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony by the Broward Public Defender’s Office.
“She was denied the dignity of a hospital bed and the assistance of a physician,” according to the letter, signed by Executive Chief Assistant Public Defender Gordon H. Weekes Jr. “The repeated and callous indifference to the medical needs of a laboring, mentally ill mother is of grave concern.”
Imagine for a moment that this exact same jail made national headlines last year for this very same thing and they are so callous and reckless that they would do it again a year later after no one was held accountable. Well, that is exactly what happened.
Because this was the second time it happened, Sheriff Troy could no longer ignore the horrifying negligence of his top brass. The Miami Herald reports that the sheriff’s office fired Colonel Gary Palmer and Lieutenant Angela Neely Thursday after an administrative review of the circumstances surrounding the birth.
“I conducted a review of the matter and determined that command level failures occurred by Colonel Palmer and Lieutenant Colonel Neely in this case,” Sheriff Tony said in a statement. “They grossly failed this agency and this inmate.”
The mentally ill woman was arrested after she was caught on someone’s home security footage walking around in their home. She had harmed no one and was in dire need of mental health and medical help. Instead of help, however, she was kidnapped and put in a concrete and steal cage on Sept. 6 as her baby boy grew inside of her for 3 more weeks.
The mentally ill woman gave birth on Sept. 27. Medical records show the woman was complaining about contractions and labor pains more than 12 hours before giving birth that day — but she was ignored.
The despicable irony of this case is that it took place just three months after the state enacted the Tammy Jackson Healthy Pregnancies for Incarcerated Women law, which is supposed to stop this very thing from happening. This goes to show how useless laws are that attempt to rein in police incompetence and cruelty.
Despite lambasting the top brass for forcing this latest victim to give birth alone in a cell, Weekes stopped short of claiming their actions were criminal, despite them clearly violating the constitution.
The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads as follows: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Here at the Free Thought Project we feel that forcing women to deliver their own babies alone in concrete rooms is excessively cruel.
“In my opinion, the law established a certain spirit of how woman should be treated, with dignity,” Weekes said. “The law does not contain provisions for what would happen if an agency violates it, but an inmate would probably be able to bring a civil case,” Weekes said.
So, instead of actually holding the cops responsible for violating their oaths to the constitution, Weekes suggests asking the taxpayers for money. Seems legit.
After being forced to give birth in jail, the woman was ordered released as her crime didn’t amount to the time she spent in jail. Though she was released, her child was then taken from her and given to the Department of Children and Families. A sad story all around.
Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--Computer Repairman Who Exposed Biden Emails Says FBI Told Him to STAY QUIET

The FBI must be dismantled .
Obama/Biden destroyed our Intel and LE agencies .
They weaponized them to destroy and disappear Democrat political opponents .
The FBI must be dismantled .
WOW : Computer Repairman Who Exposed Biden Emails Says FBI Told Him to Stay Quiet Why would they do that ?
The Delaware computer repair man who revealed Hunter and Joe Biden ’ s email dealings with a Burisma executive told reporters that the FBI had asked him to stay quiet about his acquisition of Hunter Biden ’ s laptop after they recovered the device through federal subpoena .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mac computer repair store .
He came into possession of Hunter Biden ’ s water-damaged laptop in 2019 .
When the younger Biden never returned to his store to pay for the repairs Isaac carried out on the device , the Mac legally became the property of Isaac under the terms of the repair agreement with Biden- contrary to false information from Twitter and establishment liberals who claim that the laptop ’ s contents were “ hacked.
” Hunter Biden ’ s laptop contained information and emails that detailed what appear to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a senior Burisma advisor named Vadym Pozharskyi .
Joe Biden had previously denied ever meeting anyone involved with Burisma through his son ’ s suspicious employment with the Ukranian gas company , an assertion that appears disproven through the emails uncovered on Biden ’ s laptop .
Isaac reported his possession of the laptop to the FBI at some point in 2019 .
The federal agency ultimately ended up taking possession of the device through a federal subpoena .
However , Isaac- as was his legal right as the possessor of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Macbook ’ s contents .
Isaac ultimately took the information contained within the laptop to Utah Senator Mike Lee and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani .
Giuliani in turn reported the contents to the New York Post , leading to Wednesday ’ s bombshell report on its contents .
However , Isaac revealed that the FBI had tried to convince him to stay silent about his discovery of the laptop ’ s contents , when speaking at length with reporters who arrived at his store on Wednesday after the New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They told me that nothing ever happens to people who don ’ t talk , the FBI , and that made me scared , because that ’ s not something I would expect the highest branch of , ” said Isaac .
“ Don ’ t , don ’ t — It was more along the lines of , in our experiences when stuff like this happens nothing ever bad happens to people that keep quiet.
” he added .
A reporter asked him if he believed the FBI was conducting a a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the subpoena , and he seemed to respond in the affirmative .
“ Yeah that ’ s how I feel about it kind of .
Well s*** .
No comment–It ’ s too late.
” Isaac ’ s suggestion raises serious questions about the FBI ’ s involvement in his possession of the laptop .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

The FBI must be dismantled.
Obama/Biden destroyed our Intel and LE agencies. They weaponized them to destroy and disappear Democrat political opponents. The FBI must be dismantled.
WOW: Computer Repairman Who Exposed Biden Emails Says FBI Told Him to Stay Quiet
Why would they do that?
By Richard Moorhead, Big League Politics, October 175, 2020:
The Delaware computer repair man who revealed Hunter and Joe Biden’s email dealings with a Burisma executive told reporters that the FBI had asked him to stay quiet about his acquisition of Hunter Biden’s laptop after they recovered the device through federal subpoena.
John Paul Mac Isaac owns a Delaware Mac computer repair store. He came into possession of Hunter Biden’s water-damaged laptop in 2019. When the younger Biden never returned to his store to pay for the repairs Isaac carried out on the device, the Mac legally became the property of Isaac under the terms of the repair agreement with Biden- contrary to false information from Twitter and establishment liberals who claim that the laptop’s contents were “hacked.”
Hunter Biden’s laptop contained information and emails that detailed what appear to be meetings between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and a senior Burisma advisor named Vadym Pozharskyi. Joe Biden had previously denied ever meeting anyone involved with Burisma through his son’s suspicious employment with the Ukranian gas company, an assertion that appears disproven through the emails uncovered on Biden’s laptop.
Isaac reported his possession of the laptop to the FBI at some point in 2019. The federal agency ultimately ended up taking possession of the device through a federal subpoena. However, Isaac- as was his legal right as the possessor of the device- made a hard drive backup of the Macbook’s contents.
Isaac ultimately took the information contained within the laptop to Utah Senator Mike Lee and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani in turn reported the contents to the New York Post, leading to Wednesday’s bombshell report on its contents.
However, Isaac revealed that the FBI had tried to convince him to stay silent about his discovery of the laptop’s contents, when speaking at length with reporters who arrived at his store on Wednesday after the New York Post published the story.
“They told me that nothing ever happens to people who don’t talk, the FBI, and that made me scared, because that’s not something I would expect the highest branch of,” said Isaac. “Don’t, don’t — It was more along the lines of, in our experiences when stuff like this happens nothing ever bad happens to people that keep quiet.” he added.
A reporter asked him if he believed the FBI was conducting a a “coverup” over the laptop and the subpoena, and he seemed to respond in the affirmative. “Yeah that’s how I feel about it kind of. Well s***. No comment–It’s too late.”
Isaac’s suggestion raises serious questions about the FBI’s involvement in his possession of the laptop.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--The Next Tier Of Tyranny In The UK – Businesses Threatened & Taxation Imposed

The Next Tier Of Tyranny In The UK – Businesses Threatened & Taxation Imposed The tyranny continues to grow in @ @ @ @ @ it be tactical teams descending upon a gym or taxing those coming into London , @ @ @ @ @ if not stopped is going to take over .
The Sons of Liberty ’ s @ @ @ @ @ Shemirani joins me for the latest out of the UK .
Partner with us as @ @ @ @ @ Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com @ @ @ @ @ Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
@ @ @ @ @ `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' @ @ @ @ @ , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State @ @ @ @ @ Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

The Next Tier Of Tyranny In The UK – Businesses Threatened & Taxation Imposed
The tyranny continues to grow in the United Kingdom. Whether it be tactical teams descending upon a gym or taxing those coming into London, it’s growing and if not stopped is going to take over. The Sons of Liberty’s health and wellness expert Kate Shemirani joins me for the latest out of the UK.
Articles mentioned in this episode.
https://cairnsnews.org/2020/10/16/canadian-politician-leaks-new-covid-lockdown-plan-and-great-reset-dictatorship-australia-is-part-of-it/amp/
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--School District to Georgia Mom: Wear Mask or Be Barred From Son’s Football Game (Again)

School District to Georgia Mom : Wear Mask or Be Barred From Son ’ s Football Game ( Again ) Editor ’ s Note : This is in clear violation of federal law .
I have previously written on customers and employees protected from corporate mask mandates and these apply to the schools too .
“ Sec .
202 .
All persons shall be entitled to be free , at any establishment or place , from discrimination or segregation of any kind on the ground of race , color , religion , or national origin , if such discrimination or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by any law , statute , ordinance , regulation , rule , or order of a State or any agency or political Sec .
203 .
No person shall ( a ) withhold , deny or attempt to withhold or deny , or deprive or attempt to deprive , any person of any right or privilege secured by section 201 or 202 , or ( b ) intimidate , threaten , or coerce , or attempt to intimidate , threaten , or coerce any person with the purpose of interfering with any right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 202 , or ( c ) punish or attempt to punish any person for exercising or attempting to exercise any right or privilege secured by section 201 or 202.
” ATLANTA , Ga. — The Rutherford Institute has again come to the aid of a Georgia parent who has been barred from attending her son ’ s high school football games unless she compromises her religious beliefs and complies with the school district ’ s mask requirement for spectators .
Fulton County ( Ga. ) Schools ( FCS ) lawyers rejected a request @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be exempt from the mandate in accordance with explicit provisions in Georgia Governor Brian Kemp ’ s executive orders requiring religious accommodations .
While FCS cited Georgia State High School Association ( HSA ) guidelines for its refusal , Rutherford Institute attorneys argue that the school ’ s reasoning is legally flawed given that the HSA guidelines , which only recommend spectators wear face coverings , can not take precedence over the governor ’ s orders mandating religious exemptions .
“ No parent should be forced to choose between abiding by their religious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ especially not when the government has no compelling interest for doing so and when reasonable accommodations can be made , ” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead , president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America : The War on the American People .
“ If the governor is willing to accommodate religious beliefs and provide mask exemptions to those who social distance , school officials must do no less.
” Since March 2020 , Georgia ’ s Governor has issued a series of Executive Orders responding to the COVID-19 pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and September , Gov .
Kemp authorized government entities to impose “ Local Option Face Covering Requirement [ s ] ” mandating that persons “ wear face masks or face coverings when not able to maintain Social Distancing from non-cohabitating persons [ . ]
” Each of the three Orders provides that a local mask requirement “ shall not be applied to .
.
.
, those who have a bona fide religious objection to wearing a face mask or face covering [ . ]
” Tara Barnett , whose son is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Milton High School , received an email from the school announcing that all spectators at FCS athletic event will be required to wear a face covering and that spectators will be required to social distance at the event venue , i.e.
, only sit in designated areas and sit six feet apart unless sitting with family .
Upon learning of the mask/face covering requirement , Mrs. Barnett contacted the school ’ s athletic director and requested an accommodation from the mask requirement because of her sincere religious beliefs in opposition to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The FCS athletic director denied Mrs. Barnett ’ s request to be exempt from the face covering mandate .
In its letter to FCS on behalf of Mrs. Barnett , The Rutherford Institute asserts that the denial of her request for an accommodation so she can attend her son ’ s football games clearly contradicts Gov .
Kemp ’ s Orders requiring local face covering rules allow for exemptions based on religious beliefs .
FCS , through legal counsel , refused to allow Mrs. Barnett an exemption relying on face covering recommendations of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also claimed it is not a “ government entity ” subject to the Governor ’ s religious exemption requirement , but Rutherford Institute attorneys pointed to several statutes defining school districts and boards of education as government entities .
The Rutherford Institute , a nonprofit civil liberties organization , defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated and educates the public about threats to their freedoms .
September 23 , 2020 • School District Orders Georgia Mom to Wear Mask or Be Barred From Son ’ s Football Game Despite Religious Objections and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s first letter to the Fulton County Schools Superintendent The Rutherford Institute ’ s second letter to the Fulton County Schools Superintendent

“Sec. 703. (a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer—
(1) To fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate
against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or
privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin; or
(2) To limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend
to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect
his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin.
(d) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization,
or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or
retraining, including on-the-job training programs to discriminate against any
individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or
employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.”


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-17--NY Admits Cuomo Has Been Making Up the Coronavirus “Red Zones”

NY Admits Cuomo Has Been Making Up the Coronavirus “ Red Zones ” Governor Cuomo , the media , and his supporters have claimed that his false accusation that the segregation of particular areas as hot zones , some appearing to target Orthodox Jews , was based on the work of health experts and statistics .
But discovery is a wonderful thing .
Even when judges refuse to do the right thing , the process provides invaluable insights into a deeply corrupt system .
The Brooklyn Catholic Diocese sued Cuomo and produced some incredible admissions , via OJPAC .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a brief in the Brooklyn Catholic Diocese case that “ there is no specific percentage threshold to determine when an area should be designated as an orange or yellow zone.
” Basically , Cuomo is making up rules and maps based on mood , ” OJPAC tweeted .
Zucker is the Health Commissioner for New York .
OJPAC also noted that , “ A Senior Department of Health Director revealed yesterday in court that Hot Zone maps are made in NYGovCuomo ’ s office.
” Specifically , the decision as to which zones @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cuomo ’ s office .
These were political decisions , not medical ones .

NY Admits Cuomo Has Been Making Up the Coronavirus “Red Zones”
Follow the science.
Governor Cuomo, the media, and his supporters have claimed that his false accusation that the segregation of particular areas as hot zones, some appearing to target Orthodox Jews, was based on the work of health experts and statistics.
But discovery is a wonderful thing. Even when judges refuse to do the right thing, the process provides invaluable insights into a deeply corrupt system.
The Brooklyn Catholic Diocese sued Cuomo and produced some incredible admissions, via OJPAC.
“NYGovCuomo’s Howard Zucker admits in a brief in the Brooklyn Catholic Diocese case that “there is no specific percentage threshold to determine when an area should be designated as an orange or yellow zone.” Basically, Cuomo is making up rules and maps based on mood,” OJPAC tweeted.
Zucker is the Health Commissioner for New York.
OJPAC also noted that, “A Senior Department of Health Director revealed yesterday in court that Hot Zone maps are made in NYGovCuomo’s office.”
Specifically, the decision as to which zones get labeled which color came out of Cuomo’s office. These were political decisions, not medical ones.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-18--A Little Late:  Even WHO Admits Lockdowns Are Extreme Policies With Disastrous Results

It ’ s only taken these paid for propagandists several months to come to this conclusion , much like their claims of masks shouldn ’ t be word by healthy people only to turn around and declare they should be worn by healthy people .
The World Health Organization has finally come out and had to admit that lockdowns were extreme measures that had disastrous consequences .
Last week , Dr. David Nabarro from the World Health Organization admitted that lockdowns have been devastating for much of the world , noting that “ Lockdowns just have one consequence that you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.
” Nabarro went on to list various examples of the economic damage done by lockdowns : Nabarro also reminded his audience that lockdowns won ’ t make covid-19 disappear , employing the lockdown rationale used in the early days of the covid-19 panic .
In other words , lockdowns don ’ t make diseases go away : These comments were followed this week by additional comments from Dr. Hans Kluge of the WHO , who stated lockdowns should only be a “ very , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effects on more vulnerable populations .
According to Kluge ( as summarized by CNBC ) : “ Any national lockdowns must consider direct risks and ‘ collateral damage ’ associated with the pandemic , such as the mental health impact , gender-based domestic violence and the impact on students.
” Kluge and Nabarro certainly aren ’ t the first officials from governmental health organizations who have drawn attention to the deadly and economic disastrous effects of lockdowns .
Gerd Müller , who oversees global poverty issues for the German government , last month @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that “ Far more people will die from the consequences of the lockdown than from the virus.
” He went on to predict the coming death toll : “ On the African continent alone , we expect an additional 400,000 deaths from malaria and HIV this year , as well as half a million more who will die from tuberculosis.
” As is so often the case , the poorer parts of the world fare worse than the wealthier parts .
Thus , the economic devastation reaped by business closures and forced lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Latin America , and South Asia , than will be the case in the wealthy West .
But , as we ’ ve noted here at mises.org , the West is hardly immune to the negative effects .
Even before the current recession , we knew that impoverishment and unemployment leads to greater mortality from a variety of causes , including heart disease and strokes .
With imposed isolation on top of economic carnage come deaths from suicides , drug overdoses , and untreated medical conditions .
These latest admissions from WHO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health officials acted without evidence or a consideration of the costs when they demanded lockdowns with little regard for the effects .
This should not be interpreted as an about-face , however .
We shouldn ’ t expect any officials to actually surrender their prerogatives to coercively shut down economies and force people into their homes using police and military personnel .
Bureaucrats , of course , relish this sort of power .
But it has now become so obvious that the side effects of shutdowns are so dangerous and so destructive that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make officials look like they are completely disengaged from reality .
But the recent change in tune does nonetheless represent a shift in rhetoric .
Back in March and April , governments within the United States and across the globe seized vast new emergency powers for themselves and imposed nationwide “ lockdowns ” and stay-at-home orders .
The refrain was “ 15 days to slow the spread.
” But , of course , the lockdowns did not stop there .
Slowly , the idea that lockdowns could prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed changed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ somehow make diseases disappear .
The press was using headlines saying lockdowns “ beat back ” the disease , and reporters were claiming social distancing would “ stop this virus.
” Other government “ experts ” and pundits were claiming that lockdowns could never be lifted until a vaccine became available .
Anthony Fauci , for example , claimed that no easing in lockdowns could be allowed until there were “ essentially no new cases , no deaths for a period of time.
” Given the widespread problem of false positives , what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never be scaled back .
There is little doubt that governments that listened to people like Fauci would have preferred to impose lockdowns indefinitely .
We ’ ve seen the ideal—from the politicians ’ perspective—at work in Australia , where citizens suffer under harsh lockdown rules , police arrest citizens for expressing opposition to lockdowns , and harass old women for sitting on park benches .
Police have also described smashing car windows and dragging the drivers onto the street for not being able to produce special documentation allowing them to leave their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been able to pull this off .
In many countries , this inability to force everyone into their homes has resulted from simple economic need .
In poorer economies , much of the population lives hand to mouth and without substantial welfare programs .
It ’ s simply not plausible to expect a subsistence-level shopkeeper in Mexico to sit at home and literally starve in order to comply with a stay-at-home order .
In Argentina , for example , the shutdowns have accomplished nothing other than mass impoverishment as deaths mount .
Peru @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though the nation ’ s government was lauded for its early and severe lockdown measures .
Peru now has among the worst total deaths per capita .
If nothing else , the experience illustrates the dangers of allowing medical doctors and epidemiologists to control public policy .
These “ experts , ” who apparently have little to no knowledge of how economies work or how laws are enforced , became obsessed with the idea of addressing a single disease while ignoring virtually all other considerations .
These scientists demanded that entire societies embrace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that were unproven and had long been dismissed by previous researchers as too costly .
Unfortunately , many politicians listened , and the cost in human lives and poverty will continue to grow .
It didn ’ t take a genius to figure this out .
We knew it the moment the unlawful orders were given to lockdown .
Now , governors and mayors who gave such unlawful orders need to be removed from office and charged with the crimes they have committed against the people .

It’s only taken these paid for propagandists several months to come to this conclusion, much like their claims of masks shouldn’t be word by healthy people only to turn around and declare they should be worn by healthy people. The World Health Organization has finally come out and had to admit that lockdowns were extreme measures that had disastrous consequences.
Ryan McMaken of Mises.org writes:
Last week, Dr. David Nabarro from the World Health Organization admitted that lockdowns have been devastating for much of the world, noting that “Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never, ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.” Nabarro went on to list various examples of the economic damage done by lockdowns:
Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.
Nabarro also reminded his audience that lockdowns won’t make covid-19 disappear, employing the lockdown rationale used in the early days of the covid-19 panic. In other words, lockdowns don’t make diseases go away:
The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.
These comments were followed this week by additional comments from Dr. Hans Kluge of the WHO, who stated lockdowns should only be a “very, very last resort” because of the effects on more vulnerable populations. According to Kluge (as summarized by CNBC): “Any national lockdowns must consider direct risks and ‘collateral damage’ associated with the pandemic, such as the mental health impact, gender-based domestic violence and the impact on students.”
Kluge and Nabarro certainly aren’t the first officials from governmental health organizations who have drawn attention to the deadly and economic disastrous effects of lockdowns. Gerd Müller, who oversees global poverty issues for the German government, last month told Handelsblatt, a German newspaper, that “Far more people will die from the consequences of the lockdown than from the virus.” He went on to predict the coming death toll: “On the African continent alone, we expect an additional 400,000 deaths from malaria and HIV this year, as well as half a million more who will die from tuberculosis.”
As is so often the case, the poorer parts of the world fare worse than the wealthier parts. Thus, the economic devastation reaped by business closures and forced lockdowns will endanger even more lives in Africa, Latin America, and South Asia, than will be the case in the wealthy West.
But, as we’ve noted here at mises.org, the West is hardly immune to the negative effects. Even before the current recession, we knew that impoverishment and unemployment leads to greater mortality from a variety of causes, including heart disease and strokes. With imposed isolation on top of economic carnage come deaths from suicides, drug overdoses, and untreated medical conditions.
These latest admissions from WHO personnel represent a grudging admission that the health officials acted without evidence or a consideration of the costs when they demanded lockdowns with little regard for the effects. This should not be interpreted as an about-face, however. We shouldn’t expect any officials to actually surrender their prerogatives to coercively shut down economies and force people into their homes using police and military personnel. Bureaucrats, of course, relish this sort of power.
But it has now become so obvious that the side effects of shutdowns are so dangerous and so destructive that to not at least admit this would make officials look like they are completely disengaged from reality.
But the recent change in tune does nonetheless represent a shift in rhetoric.
From “15 Days” to Lockdown “Indefinitely”
Back in March and April, governments within the United States and across the globe seized vast new emergency powers for themselves and imposed nationwide “lockdowns” and stay-at-home orders. The refrain was “15 days to slow the spread.” But, of course, the lockdowns did not stop there.
Slowly, the idea that lockdowns could prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed changed into the false notion that lockdowns can somehow make diseases disappear. The press was using headlines saying lockdowns “beat back” the disease, and reporters were claiming social distancing would “stop this virus.” Other government “experts” and pundits were claiming that lockdowns could never be lifted until a vaccine became available.
Anthony Fauci, for example, claimed that no easing in lockdowns could be allowed until there were “essentially no new cases, no deaths for a period of time.” Given the widespread problem of false positives, what this really meant is that lockdowns can never be scaled back.
There is little doubt that governments that listened to people like Fauci would have preferred to impose lockdowns indefinitely. We’ve seen the ideal—from the politicians’ perspective—at work in Australia, where citizens suffer under harsh lockdown rules, police arrest citizens for expressing opposition to lockdowns, and harass old women for sitting on park benches. Police have also described smashing car windows and dragging the drivers onto the street for not being able to produce special documentation allowing them to leave their homes.
Fortunately, few governments have been able to pull this off. In many countries, this inability to force everyone into their homes has resulted from simple economic need. In poorer economies, much of the population lives hand to mouth and without substantial welfare programs. It’s simply not plausible to expect a subsistence-level shopkeeper in Mexico to sit at home and literally starve in order to comply with a stay-at-home order. In Argentina, for example, the shutdowns have accomplished nothing other than mass impoverishment as deaths mount. Peru is dealing with a similar fate even though the nation’s government was lauded for its early and severe lockdown measures. Peru now has among the worst total deaths per capita.
If nothing else, the experience illustrates the dangers of allowing medical doctors and epidemiologists to control public policy. These “experts,” who apparently have little to no knowledge of how economies work or how laws are enforced, became obsessed with the idea of addressing a single disease while ignoring virtually all other considerations. These scientists demanded that entire societies embrace radical, bizarre, and experimental tactics that were unproven and had long been dismissed by previous researchers as too costly. Unfortunately, many politicians listened, and the cost in human lives and poverty will continue to grow.
It didn’t take a genius to figure this out. We knew it the moment the unlawful orders were given to lockdown. Now, governors and mayors who gave such unlawful orders need to be removed from office and charged with the crimes they have committed against the people.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-18--The Coronavirus Experts Were Wrong, Now They Need Scapegoats – It’s not about fighting the virus, bu

The Coronavirus Experts Were Wrong , Now They Need Scapegoats – It ’ s not about fighting the virus , but punishing political & cultural enemies .
The problem isn ’ t just the China Virus .
It ’ s that we adopted the China Model to fight it .
Public health experts adopted China ’ s draconian lockdowns without knowing how well they really worked and in a country that , fortunately , lacks the power to truly enforce them .
China ’ s deceptiveness and lack of transparency meant that we did not know how well anything that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus that it spawned actually worked .
Despite that , our public health experts , and those of most free countries , adopted the China Model .
We don ’ t know how well the China Model worked for the People ’ s Republic of China , but it failed in every free country that tried it .
Lockdowns eventually gave way to reopenings and new waves of infection .
This was always going to happen because not even the more socialist European countries have the police state or the compliant populations of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public health experts adopted China ’ s compulsive mask wearing , a cultural practice that predates the virus , as if wearing a few flimsy scraps of fiber would fix everything .
It hadn ’ t and it didn ’ t .
But by then the public health experts and the media that had touted them were moving fully into the scapegoat portion of the crisis .
The China Model had failed , all that was left was shifting the blame to more conservative and traditional populations , and away from the cultural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meant falsely blaming Chassidic Jews for the second wave .
From Maine to San Francisco , Democrat leaders and their media blamed conservative Christian gatherings .
Their national counterparts loudly blamed President Trump for not wearing a mask all the time .
A New York Times headline captured the cynical broad spectrum cultural scapegoating with , “ N.Y.C .
Threatens Orthodox Jewish Areas on Virus , but Trump ’ s Impact Is Seen.
” The uncomfortable truth was that the lockdowns had failed economically , socially , and medically .
Even blue states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carry the impossible economic burden much longer .
The Black Lives Matter riots and the onset of summer broke the # StayHome taboos , and medically , the lockdowns had been useless efforts to meet a fake crisis of hospital overflows .
America , like too many other countries , put the experts in charge and they failed .
Miserably .
Democrats claimed that they were superior because they were “ listening to the science ” .
They weren ’ t listening to the science , which is not an oracle and does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were obeying a class of officials , some of them whom weren ’ t even medical professionals , who impressed elected officials and the public with statistical sleight of hand .
And little else .
The entire lockdown to testing to reopening pipeline that we adopted wholesale was a typical bureaucratic and corporate exercise , complete with the illusion of metrics and goals , that suffered from all the typical problems of bureaucracy , academia , and corporate culture .
The system that determines reopenings and closings is an echo chamber that measures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do with the real world .
Testing has become a cargo cult exercise that confuses the map with the world , and the virus with the spreadsheet .
It gamifies fighting the pandemic while dragging entire countries into an imaginary world based on its invented rules .
When the media reports a rise or decrease in positive tests , it ’ s treated as if it ’ s an assessment of the virus , rather than an incomplete data point that measures its own measurements .
The daily coronavirus reports have become the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sound impressive , mean absolutely nothing , and are the pet obsession of a bureaucracy that not only has no understanding of the problem , but its grip on power has made it the problem .
The smarter medical professionals understand that the theories have failed , while the administrators who put the theories into practice confused their system with science .
The politicians listen to the administrators and when they tell us to trust the science , they mean the bureaucracy .
The medical professionals can ’ t and won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ late .
The best and brightest spent the worst part of a year shuffling rationales like a gambler ’ s trick deck , wrecked the economy , and sent tens of thousands of infected patients into nursing homes to infect the residents , accounting for at least a third of the national coronavirus death toll .
Like most national leadership disasters , it was a combination of misjudgment , understandable mistakes , tragic errors , and acts of incomprehensible stupidity or unmitigated evil .
A lot of people are dead , a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the problem is far from solved .
Someone will have to be blamed and they certainly don ’ t want it to be themselves .
The lockdown and the rule of the public health experts has become too big to fail .
Mistakes were made , as the saying goes .
Projections were built based on bad and incomplete data .
Everyone followed the path of least resistance by doing what China had done .
And everyone in the system , from the experts to the administrators to the politicians to the media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ massive error the world has been living under too big to fail .
There are only two choices left .
Admit the magnitude of the mistake or find someone to blame .
The establishment that touted the experts is blaming its political and cultural enemies , the people it has been priming the public to see as strange , selfish , irrational , and dangerous .
And also the very people who have been the loudest opponents of lockdown culture .
Given a choice between admitting the system was wrong or blaming the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the establishment has followed the same pattern as every authoritarian leftist regime .
The lockdowns didn ’ t fail , they were failed by conservative Christians and Jews , by President Trump , by people who were too selfish to give up their lives , businesses , and religion for the greater good .
And if only they had , the coronavirus would be gone and everything would be fine .
The China Model promised something that its proponents quickly knew it couldn ’ t deliver .
Everything since then has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quackery and hackery .
The louder they blame critics and dissenters for the failure , the more obvious the coverup becomes .
Lockdown culture needs patsies to take the fall for why it didn ’ t work .
Like every leftist social and economic experiment , its defenders are left to argue that it was never properly tried .
If only it weren ’ t for Trump , and for the dissenters , for the Chassidic Jews in Brooklyn , for Christian weddings in San Francisco and Maine , for gyms , bars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked .
Yet the simple truth is that the China Model hasn ’ t worked in any country that isn ’ t China .
It doesn ’ t matter who the leader or the ruling party are , whether the public wore or didn ’ t wear masks , the resurgence is not a political phenomenon , science doesn ’ t speak , and the virus doesn ’ t listen .
But of all the countries in the world , America was especially ill-fitted to adopt an authoritarian public health model .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the country makes us unique and should have made it abundantly obvious that no such system would work .
Anyone but an expert or administrator would have understood that these plans were doomed .
But what the system failed to accomplish in battling the virus , it made up for by providing the leadership that had enacted it with a wonderful opportunity to settle its political scores .
The lockdowns don ’ t exist anymore as a prophylactic policy , but as a political vendetta .
The more people die , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone suffers , the more vicious the vendetta grows as it hunts for scapegoats , political and religious , for the great error of terror .
Leftist regimes turn to political terror as their policies fail .
When the idealism dies , and the theories fall apart , the organizers pursue misery for the sake of misery , using fear , deprivation , and hate to maintain their grip on power while crushing the political threats to their rule .
The rule of the experts isn ’ t fighting the virus .
It @ @ @ @ @

The Coronavirus Experts Were Wrong, Now They Need Scapegoats – It’s not about fighting the virus, but punishing political & cultural enemies.
The problem isn’t just the China Virus. It’s that we adopted the China Model to fight it.
Public health experts adopted China’s draconian lockdowns without knowing how well they really worked and in a country that, fortunately, lacks the power to truly enforce them.
China’s deceptiveness and lack of transparency meant that we did not know how well anything that the Communist dictatorship did to battle the virus that it spawned actually worked. Despite that, our public health experts, and those of most free countries, adopted the China Model.
We don’t know how well the China Model worked for the People’s Republic of China, but it failed in every free country that tried it. Lockdowns eventually gave way to reopenings and new waves of infection. This was always going to happen because not even the more socialist European countries have the police state or the compliant populations of a Communist dictatorship.
Desperate, the public health experts adopted China’s compulsive mask wearing, a cultural practice that predates the virus, as if wearing a few flimsy scraps of fiber would fix everything.
It hadn’t and it didn’t.
But by then the public health experts and the media that had touted them were moving fully into the scapegoat portion of the crisis. The China Model had failed, all that was left was shifting the blame to more conservative and traditional populations, and away from the cultural elites.
In New York City that meant falsely blaming Chassidic Jews for the second wave. From Maine to San Francisco, Democrat leaders and their media blamed conservative Christian gatherings. Their national counterparts loudly blamed President Trump for not wearing a mask all the time.
A New York Times headline captured the cynical broad spectrum cultural scapegoating with, “N.Y.C. Threatens Orthodox Jewish Areas on Virus, but Trump’s Impact Is Seen.”
The uncomfortable truth was that the lockdowns had failed economically, socially, and medically.
Even blue states and cities were no longer able to carry the impossible economic burden much longer. The Black Lives Matter riots and the onset of summer broke the #StayHome taboos, and medically, the lockdowns had been useless efforts to meet a fake crisis of hospital overflows.
America, like too many other countries, put the experts in charge and they failed. Miserably.
Democrats claimed that they were superior because they were “listening to the science”. They weren’t listening to the science, which is not an oracle and does not give interviews. Instead, they were obeying a class of officials, some of them whom weren’t even medical professionals, who impressed elected officials and the public with statistical sleight of hand. And little else.
The entire lockdown to testing to reopening pipeline that we adopted wholesale was a typical bureaucratic and corporate exercise, complete with the illusion of metrics and goals, that suffered from all the typical problems of bureaucracy, academia, and corporate culture.
The system that determines reopenings and closings is an echo chamber that measures its own functioning while having little to do with the real world. Testing has become a cargo cult exercise that confuses the map with the world, and the virus with the spreadsheet. It gamifies fighting the pandemic while dragging entire countries into an imaginary world based on its invented rules.
When the media reports a rise or decrease in positive tests, it’s treated as if it’s an assessment of the virus, rather than an incomplete data point that measures its own measurements.
The daily coronavirus reports have become the equivalent of Soviet harvest reports. They sound impressive, mean absolutely nothing, and are the pet obsession of a bureaucracy that not only has no understanding of the problem, but its grip on power has made it the problem.
The smarter medical professionals understand that the theories have failed, while the administrators who put the theories into practice confused their system with science. The politicians listen to the administrators and when they tell us to trust the science, they mean the bureaucracy. The medical professionals can’t and won’t backtrack now. It’s too late.
The best and brightest spent the worst part of a year shuffling rationales like a gambler’s trick deck, wrecked the economy, and sent tens of thousands of infected patients into nursing homes to infect the residents, accounting for at least a third of the national coronavirus death toll.
Like most national leadership disasters, it was a combination of misjudgment, understandable mistakes, tragic errors, and acts of incomprehensible stupidity or unmitigated evil.
A lot of people are dead, a lot more are out of work, and the problem is far from solved. Someone will have to be blamed and they certainly don’t want it to be themselves.
The lockdown and the rule of the public health experts has become too big to fail.
Mistakes were made, as the saying goes. Projections were built based on bad and incomplete data. Everyone followed the path of least resistance by doing what China had done. And everyone in the system, from the experts to the administrators to the politicians to the media, is complicit. That makes the massive error the world has been living under too big to fail.
There are only two choices left. Admit the magnitude of the mistake or find someone to blame.
The establishment that touted the experts is blaming its political and cultural enemies, the people it has been priming the public to see as strange, selfish, irrational, and dangerous. And also the very people who have been the loudest opponents of lockdown culture.
Given a choice between admitting the system was wrong or blaming the system’s failure on its critics, the establishment has followed the same pattern as every authoritarian leftist regime.
The lockdowns didn’t fail, they were failed by conservative Christians and Jews, by President Trump, by people who were too selfish to give up their lives, businesses, and religion for the greater good. And if only they had, the coronavirus would be gone and everything would be fine.
The China Model promised something that its proponents quickly knew it couldn’t deliver. Everything since then has been a scam to cover up the original quackery and hackery. The louder they blame critics and dissenters for the failure, the more obvious the coverup becomes.
Lockdown culture needs patsies to take the fall for why it didn’t work. Like every leftist social and economic experiment, its defenders are left to argue that it was never properly tried. If only it weren’t for Trump, and for the dissenters, for the Chassidic Jews in Brooklyn, for Christian weddings in San Francisco and Maine, for gyms, bars, and beaches, it would have worked.
Yet the simple truth is that the China Model hasn’t worked in any country that isn’t China.
It doesn’t matter who the leader or the ruling party are, whether the public wore or didn’t wear masks, the resurgence is not a political phenomenon, science doesn’t speak, and the virus doesn’t listen. But of all the countries in the world, America was especially ill-fitted to adopt an authoritarian public health model. The sheer size, openness, and diversity of the country makes us unique and should have made it abundantly obvious that no such system would work.
Anyone but an expert or administrator would have understood that these plans were doomed.
But what the system failed to accomplish in battling the virus, it made up for by providing the leadership that had enacted it with a wonderful opportunity to settle its political scores.
The lockdowns don’t exist anymore as a prophylactic policy, but as a political vendetta. The more people die, the more businesses are ruined, the more everyone suffers, the more vicious the vendetta grows as it hunts for scapegoats, political and religious, for the great error of terror.
Leftist regimes turn to political terror as their policies fail. When the idealism dies, and the theories fall apart, the organizers pursue misery for the sake of misery, using fear, deprivation, and hate to maintain their grip on power while crushing the political threats to their rule.
The rule of the experts isn’t fighting the virus. It has become the virus.
Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-18--Your Guide to The Great Reset

Your Guide to The Great Reset

We ’ ve covered The Coming Great Reset , and it ’ s more than a financial reset .
It is the promised New World Order by globalists .
You ’ ve all heard by now that The Great Reset is upon us .
But what is The Great Reset , exactly , and what does it mean for the future of humanity ?
Join James Corbet of The Corbet Report for this in-depth exploration of the latest rebranding of the New World Order agenda and its vision of a post-human Fourth Industrial Revolution .
• Kerry et al .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ There Foreknowledge of the Plandemic ?
• What is the Fourth Industrial Revolution ?
• Yuval Noah Harari : the world after coronavirus | Free to read • unklfranco comments on James Corbett Breaks Down the Great Reset ( on Odysee ) • Sesame Street on education as a tool of societal transformation • Rich getting richer during COVID scam ( New World Next Week ) Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe , Spreely , Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his `` more precious than rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all trades , Christian and lover of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
.
Follow Tim on Twitter .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

We’ve covered The Coming Great Reset, and it’s more than a financial reset. It is the promised New World Order by globalists.
You’ve all heard by now that The Great Reset is upon us. But what is The Great Reset, exactly, and what does it mean for the future of humanity?
Join James Corbet of The Corbet Report for this in-depth exploration of the latest rebranding of the New World Order agenda and its vision of a post-human Fourth Industrial Revolution.

SHOW NOTES:
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-18--Michigan Court of Appeals: Ballots Must Arrive by Election Day; 14-Day Extension Overturned

Dismantling the Democrat coup , one lawsuit at a time .
Slow and steady , I know , but it ’ s better than bullets , riots , arson….. which is how the Democrats impose their poison .
Michigan Court of Appeals : Ballots Must Arrive by Election Day ; 14-Day Extension Overturned The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Friday that absentee ballots must arrive by Election Day , November 3 , to be counted — overturning a lower court decision that had extended the deadline by 14 days .
As Breitbart News reported in September , a lower state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that favored Democrats ’ effort to extend the deadline : Michigan Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens ruled that mail-in ballots postmarked by November 2 — the day before Election Day — will still be counted in Michigan in the 2020 election .
In addition , Judge Stephens said that strangers can return other people ’ s ballots — normally a felony — between 5:01 p.m. on Friday , October 30 , and 8:00 p.m. on November 3 , the moment that polling places are supposed to close on Election Day .
However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was reportedly a straight 3-0 decision , with the panel of judges ruling that any changes to election rules must be approved by the state legislature .
Currently , the state legislature in Michigan has a Republican majority , though Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer is a Democrat .
President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden are fighting a pitched political battle in the state , which went Republican in 2016 for the first time in decades .

Dismantling the Democrat coup, one lawsuit at a time. Slow and steady, I know, but it’s better than bullets, riots, arson….. which is how the Democrats impose their poison.
Michigan Court of Appeals: Ballots Must Arrive by Election Day; 14-Day Extension Overturned
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Friday that absentee ballots must arrive by Election Day, November 3, to be counted — overturning a lower court decision that had extended the deadline by 14 days.
By: Breitbart News, October 16, 2020:
DETROIT (AP) — Absentee ballots must arrive by Nov. 3 to be counted, the Michigan Court of Appeals said Friday, blocking a 14-day extension that had been ordered by a lower court and embraced by key Democratic officials. — Kendall Karson (@kendallkarson) October 16, 2020
As Breitbart News reported in September, a lower state court had initially handed down a decision that favored Democrats’ effort to extend the deadline:
Michigan Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens ruled that mail-in ballots postmarked by November 2 — the day before Election Day — will still be counted in Michigan in the 2020 election. In addition, Judge Stephens said that strangers can return other people’s ballots — normally a felony — between 5:01 p.m. on Friday, October 30, and 8:00 p.m. on November 3, the moment that polling places are supposed to close on Election Day.
However, that decision was overturned in what was reportedly a straight 3-0 decision, with the panel of judges ruling that any changes to election rules must be approved by the state legislature.
The Michigan Court of Appeals has blocked a 14-day extension that had been ordered by a lower court, mandating that absentee ballots arrive by Nov. 3 in order to be counted. In a 3-0 opinion, the appeals panel said any changes must rest with the Legislature, not the judiciary. — Jon King (@JonKing98115241) October 16, 2020
Currently, the state legislature in Michigan has a Republican majority, though Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is a Democrat.
President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden are fighting a pitched political battle in the state, which went Republican in 2016 for the first time in decades.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-19--Many Americans Now Planning To “Bug Out” Ahead Of Election Day As Authorities Brace For Chaos In The

Many Americans Now Planning To “ Bug Out ” Ahead Of Election Day As Authorities Brace For Chaos In The Streets Will you be safe where you currently are if the election results cause chaos to erupt in the streets of our major cities ?
A lot of Americans are becoming deeply concerned about their personal safety as we approach November 3rd because they can see what is coming .
It is going to take a lot of extra time to count all of the votes because tens of millions of Americans are voting by mail this time around , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawyers and are prepared to contest the results of the election to the bitter end .
No matter who ends up being declared the winner when it is all over , there will be millions upon millions of very angry voters out there that are likely to feel as though the election was stolen from them , and that is a recipe for widespread societal unrest .
I truly wish that we could go back and do things differently so that we would not be facing this sort of scenario , but it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ More than 27 million Americans have already voted , and more are voting every day .
Any attempts to fix the process will have to wait for future elections , and without a doubt , it definitely needs to be fixed .
It is still difficult for me to believe that I am actually writing about the possibility of violence after a U.S. presidential election , but this is where we are at as a society .
In fact , there is violence in the streets right now .
This should break all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to solve anything .
Unfortunately , an increasing number of people are not listening to voices of reason , and we are seeing anger and frustration rise to levels that we have never seen before .
At this point , most Americans are expecting the worst .
To be more specific , one recent survey found that 55 percent of all registered voters expect a rise in violence following the election… Even more alarming , a different survey found that more than 40 percent of Republicans and more than 40 percent of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least “ a little ” justified if their party ends up losing… I truly wish that those numbers were not real , but they are .
As Election Day draws near , many Americans have decided that “ bugging out ” is the best thing to do .
For example , one 31-year-old New York resident is going to be staying with her parents on Election day because she believes “ the city will be on fire ” if Trump wins… And 42-year-old Ooana Trien is planning to spend Election Day out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ protesters will try and burn down Trump Tower ” … Law enforcement authorities all over the nation are also deeply concerned about the potential for violence .
For example , in New Jersey officials have warned that we could potentially see “ civil unrest resulting in riots , violent acts , and fatalities ” … Yes , you read that correctly .
They actually used the word “ fatalities ” .
In New York , residents were rattled by a leaked NYPD memo that warned of violent protests from October 25th through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the information security officer for Maricopa County is encouraging people to have law enforcement authorities on speed dial just in case something happens… Election Day is now just a little over two weeks away , and emotions are running really high .
Most Democrats fully expect Joe Biden to win , and many of them are still anticipating a landslide .
most Republicans believe that the national polls are completely wrong again and that President Trump will ultimately emerge victorious .
In the end , one side will be proven wrong and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be very , very bitter .
We all remember the rioting that we witnessed earlier this year , and many believe that what is ahead could be far , far worse .
In 2020 , gun sales have soared to levels that we have never seen before , and many Americans find themselves purchasing guns for the very first time .
One of those first time buyers is a 44-year-old single mother named Andreyah Garland… According to Reuters , a “ potentially contested election that many fear could spark violence ” played a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ firearm… If you could go back 50 years ago and tell Americans what conditions would be like in 2020 , most of them would not believe you .
Our society is literally melting down right in front of our eyes , and I don ’ t think that anyone is going to be able to stop it from happening .
Of course , this election will come and go , but the social instability that we are witnessing will remain , and at this point , everyone should be able to see that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future .

Many Americans Now Planning To “Bug Out” Ahead Of Election Day As Authorities Brace For Chaos In The Streets
Will you be safe where you currently are if the election results cause chaos to erupt in the streets of our major cities? A lot of Americans are becoming deeply concerned about their personal safety as we approach November 3rd because they can see what is coming. It is going to take a lot of extra time to count all of the votes because tens of millions of Americans are voting by mail this time around, and both sides have recruited armies of lawyers and are prepared to contest the results of the election to the bitter end. No matter who ends up being declared the winner when it is all over, there will be millions upon millions of very angry voters out there that are likely to feel as though the election was stolen from them, and that is a recipe for widespread societal unrest. I truly wish that we could go back and do things differently so that we would not be facing this sort of scenario, but it is too late for that now. More than 27 million Americans have already voted, and more are voting every day. Any attempts to fix the process will have to wait for future elections, and without a doubt, it definitely needs to be fixed.
It is still difficult for me to believe that I am actually writing about the possibility of violence after a U.S. presidential election, but this is where we are at as a society.
In fact, there is violence in the streets right now.
This should break all of our hearts because violence is not going to solve anything.
Unfortunately, an increasing number of people are not listening to voices of reason, and we are seeing anger and frustration rise to levels that we have never seen before.
At this point, most Americans are expecting the worst. To be more specific, one recent survey found that 55 percent of all registered voters expect a rise in violence following the election…
In the YouGov survey, about 55 percent of registered voters said they thought violence would increase in the U.S. following the Nov. 3 presidential election. Just under 11 percent of respondents said they didn’t expect a rise in violence to occur after the election, while 33 percent of voters were unsure.
Even more alarming, a different survey found that more than 40 percent of Republicans and more than 40 percent of Democrats believe that violence would be at least “a little” justified if their party ends up losing…
In September, 44 percent of Republicans and 41 percent of Democrats said there would be at least “a little” justification for violence if the other party’s nominee wins the election.
I truly wish that those numbers were not real, but they are.
As Election Day draws near, many Americans have decided that “bugging out” is the best thing to do. For example, one 31-year-old New York resident is going to be staying with her parents on Election day because she believes “the city will be on fire” if Trump wins…
Flatiron resident Andrea, 31, also decided to pack up before Nov. 3. “I went to my parents in New Jersey for about two weeks when the BLM protests got bad and the looting started. So I definitely want to get out of here the week of the election,” said the public-relations specialist, a Republican who asked that her last name not be used. “I’m thinking if Trump wins, it’s going to be a disaster — the city will be on fire. People are going to go nuts.”
And 42-year-old Ooana Trien is planning to spend Election Day out of the city because she is concerned that “protesters will try and burn down Trump Tower”…
The Trump supporter, who is mailing in her ballot, plans to open up her doors to others looking to escape. “I told my friends that whoever wanted to get out of the city was welcome here. One friend who lives in Washington Heights is going to vote in the morning [on Nov. 3] and come straight up to the beach,” she said. “My mother thinks that whether [Trump] wins or loses, protesters will try and burn down Trump Tower.”
Law enforcement authorities all over the nation are also deeply concerned about the potential for violence.
For example, in New Jersey officials have warned that we could potentially see “civil unrest resulting in riots, violent acts, and fatalities”…
“Election result delays and recounts could result in protests and attempts to occupy election offices,” officials with the New Jersey Department of Homeland Security and Preparedness warned in a threat assessment issued in late September. “Incidents of civil unrest resulting in riots, violent acts, and fatalities will converge with election uncertainty, producing confrontations between protesters and counter-demonstrators challenging election outcomes,” it noted.
Yes, you read that correctly.
They actually used the word “fatalities”.
In New York, residents were rattled by a leaked NYPD memo that warned of violent protests from October 25th through the early portion of 2021…
New Yorkers are on edge after a leaked NYPD memo, obtained by The Post, revealed this week that police are preparing for protests to begin as early as Oct. 25 and grow in intensity through next year. The department decreed officers should “be prepared for deployment,” adding: “This November 3rd will be one of the most highly contested presidential elections in the modern era. There is also a strong likelihood that the winner of the presidential election may not be decided for several weeks.”
In Arizona, the information security officer for Maricopa County is encouraging people to have law enforcement authorities on speed dial just in case something happens…
“Make sure that you’re reaching out to your law enforcement and say, on and around Election Day, what is our plan?” he said. “Do you have an emergency contact list? Do you have your police department, your sheriff, whoever, on speed dial ready to get them to respond to any kind of threat?”
Election Day is now just a little over two weeks away, and emotions are running really high.
Most Democrats fully expect Joe Biden to win, and many of them are still anticipating a landslide.
Of course,
most Republicans believe that the national polls are completely wrong again and that President Trump will ultimately emerge victorious.
In the end, one side will be proven wrong and the disappointment that they will feel will be very, very bitter.
We all remember the rioting that we witnessed earlier this year, and many believe that what is ahead could be far, far worse.
In 2020, gun sales have soared to levels that we have never seen before, and many Americans find themselves purchasing guns for the very first time. One of those first time buyers is a 44-year-old single mother named Andreyah Garland…
Andreyah Garland, a 44-year-old single mother of three daughters, bought a shotgun in May for protection in the quaint middle-class town of Fishkill, New York. She joined a new and fast-growing local gun club to learn how to shoot.
According to Reuters, a “potentially contested election that many fear could spark violence” played a role in her decision to purchase a firearm…
Like legions of other first-time buyers who are contributing to record sales for the U.S. gun industry this year, Garland’s decision to take up arms is driven in part by disturbing news about the coronavirus pandemic, social unrest over police killings of Black people and a potentially contested election that many fear could spark violence. “With everything going on around us,” she said, “you see a need.”
If you could go back 50 years ago and tell Americans what conditions would be like in 2020, most of them would not believe you.
Our society is literally melting down right in front of our eyes, and I don’t think that anyone is going to be able to stop it from happening.
Of course, this election will come and go, but the social instability that we are witnessing will remain, and at this point, everyone should be able to see that America is heading into a very dark future.
Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder


thewashingtonstandard--2020-10-19--Benghazi, Extortion 17, Osama bin Laden & The 2020 Elections

Last week , an alleged bombshell video claimed that a CIA whistleblower had audio evidence , along with documentation that @ @ @ @ @ and Leon Panetta , as well as others in the Obama administration , including Obama @ @ @ @ @ Team Six killed aboard Extortion 17 .
However , as of yet , nothing has @ @ @ @ @ former Navy JAG officer Don Brown joins me to talk about what we really know @ @ @ @ @ .
All our reports on Extortion 17 Partner with us as a Son or Daughter @ @ @ @ @ //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media SonsOfLibertyMedia.com , Minds , MeWe @ @ @ @ @ is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com .
He is husband to @ @ @ @ @ rubies '' wife , father of 10 `` mighty arrows '' , jack of all @ @ @ @ @ of liberty .
He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina .
@ @ @ @ @ .
Also check him out on Gab Mumbl It and Steemit

Last week, an alleged bombshell video claimed that a CIA whistleblower had audio evidence, along with documentation that Joe Biden, John Brennan and Leon Panetta, as well as others in the Obama administration, including Obama and Hillary Clinton had SEAL Team Six killed aboard Extortion 17. However, as of yet, nothing has been produced. Author and former Navy JAG officer Don Brown joins me to talk about what we really know about Benghazi & Extortion 17.
Pick up Don’s books here: https://amzn.to/2T4FoIK
Additional resources.
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/extortion-17-bigger-scandal-betrayal-benghazi/
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media