thewashingtonstandard--2020-08-04--Milgram’s Experiment On How Far Will You Go To Obey An Order – Does It Apply Today?

Milgram ’ s Experiment On How Far Will You Go To Obey An Order – Does It Apply Today ?
Does anyone remember Stanley Milgram ?
If not , maybe you remember what has become known as Milgram ’ s Experiment .
The question that should burn in everyone ’ s mind today , looking around at all the individuals wearing masks and following unconstitutional , illegal , unlawful , despotic , tyrannical executive orders by some governors and local municipalities , is “ are we witnessing the real practice of Milgram ’ s conclusion on obedience to authority today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ familiar with Stanley Milgram and his experiment , a brief history is provided .
Stanley Milgram was a 26-year-old social psychologist at Yale University .
He started his experiments in 1961 , approximately one year after the trial of World War II criminal Adolf Eichmann had begun in order to answer his original question of whether nations other than Germany could or would differ in their degrees of conformity to authority .
To conduct his experiment , Milgram advertised for participants ages 20 to 50 from all walks of life offering to pay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Americans , those purveyors of rugged individualism and patriotism , would not easily acquiesce to conformity or inflict harm upon others at someone else ’ s command .
After choosing 40 participants that would be “ teachers , ” Milgram had some of his associates “ act ” as learners , with an individual wearing a white coat ( experimenter ) as the “ authority ” sitting in the same room with the “ teacher ” .
The “ learner ” was taken to a separate room , where the “ teacher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the “ learner ” was attached to electrodes that would deliver an electric shock at the hand of the “ teacher ” .
What participants ( teachers ) did not know was the “ learner ” was not connected to the electrodes that delivered the electric shock .
In Milgram ’ s original experiment , participants took part in what they thought was a “ learning task.
” This task was designed to investigate how punishment—in this case in the form of electric shocks—affected learning .
Volunteers thought they were participating in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact a confederate of the experimenter .
A draw to determine who would be the “ teacher ” and who would be the “ learner ” was rigged ; the true volunteer always ended up as the teacher and the confederate as learner .
The pairs were moved into separate rooms , connected by a microphone .
The teacher read aloud a series of word pairs , such as “ red–hammer , ” which the learner was instructed to memorize .
The teacher then read the target word ( red ) , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paired word from four alternatives ( ocean , fan , hammer , glue ) .
If the learner erred , the teacher was instructed to deliver an electric shock as punishment , increasing the shock by 15-volt increments with each successive error .
Although the teacher could not see the learner in the adjacent room , he could hear his responses to the shocks as well as to the questions .
According to a prearranged script , at 75 volts , the learner started to scream ; from 150 volts to 330 volts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complaining that his heart was bothering him ; at 330 volts , he absolutely refused to go on .
After that , the teacher ’ s questions were met by silence .
Whenever the teacher hesitated , the experimenter pressed the teacher to continue , insisting that the “ the experiment requires that you continue ” and reminding him that “ although the shocks may be painful , they cause no permanent tissue damage.
” What Milgram discovered was shocking .
In this version of the experiment , 65 % ( 26 out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ continued to inflict shocks right up to the 450-volt level , despite the learner ’ s screams , protests , and , at the 330-volt level , disturbing silence.
” Once reaching the 450-volt level , the participants obeyed the “ experimenter ’ s ” instruction to continue to administer the 450-volt level shocks when the subject failed to respond .
Nature.Berkeley.edu reported on the three categories Milgram divided the participants .
Obeyed but justified themselves .
Some obedient participants gave up responsibility for their actions , blaming the experimenter .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they reasoned , it would have been the experimenter ’ s fault .
Others had transferred the blame to the learner : “ He was so stupid and stubborn he deserved to be shocked.
” Obeyed but blamed themselves .
Others felt badly about what they had done and were quite harsh on themselves .
Members of this group would , perhaps , be more likely to challenge authority if confronted with a similar situation in the future .
Rebelled .
Finally , rebellious subjects questioned the authority of the experimenter and argued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the protection of the learner over the needs of the experimenter .
Some of these individuals felt they were accountable to a higher authority .
Why were those who challenged authority in the minority ?
So entrenched is obedience it may void personal codes of conduct .
It stands to reason there was some question of ethical , moral , and methodological principles of Milgram ’ s experiment by other psychologists .
The subsequent National Research Act of 1974 provided restrictions on the use of human subjects which prevented others from conducting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would cause participants to experience extreme distress .
One of Milgram ’ s biggest critics was Gina Perry , who uncovered hundreds of audiotapes of Milgram ’ s experiment in the Yale Archives , and indicated several problems existed with Milgram ’ s study .
However , other studies expanded upon Milgram with similar results .
Although full replications of Milgram ’ s experiment are precluded in the United States because of ethical and legal constraints on experimenters , there have been replications attempted in other countries , and attempts by U.S. experimenters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conducted by Dariusz Dolinski and colleagues in 2015 generated levels of obedience higher than the original Milgram experiment , although the study may be criticized because it employed lower levels of shock .
More intriguing was the 2009 replication by Jerry Burger , who found an ingenious way of navigating the ethical concerns about Milgram ’ s original experiment .
Burger noted that in the original experiment 79 percent of subjects who continued after the 150 volts—after the learner ’ s first screams—continued all the way to the end of the scale , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same would be true of subjects today , Burger determined how many were willing to deliver shocks beyond the 150-volt level , at which point the experiment was discontinued .
About 70 percent were willing to continue the experiment at this point , suggesting that subjects remain just as compliant in the 21st century .
Nonetheless , Burger ’ s study was based upon a questionable assumption , namely that 150-volt compliance has remained a reliable predictor of 450-volt compliance .
Subjects today might be willing to go a bit beyond 150 volts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end of the scale ( after learners demand that the experiment be discontinued etc. )
.
In fact , this assumption begs the critical question at issue .
However , French television came to the rescue .
One game show replicated Milgram ’ s experiment , with the game show host as the authority and the “ questioner ” as the subject .
In a study reported in the 2012 European Review of Applied Psychology , J.-L. Beauvois and colleagues replicated Milgram ’ s voice feedback condition , with identical props , instructions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prods .
One might question whether a game show host has as much authority as a scientific experimenter , but whatever authority they had managed to elicit levels of obedience equivalent to Milgram ’ s original experiment ( in fact somewhat higher , 81 percent as opposed to the original 65 percent ) .
It would seem that at least French nationals are as compliant today as Milgram ’ s original subjects in the 1960s .
In fact , the replication suggests a darker picture .
One of optimistic findings of the original @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in which there were three teachers , two of whom ( both confederates of the experimenter ) defied the experimenter .
Given this social support , most subjects refused to continue to administer shocks , suggesting that social solidarity serves as a kind of a defense against destructive obedience to authority .
Unfortunately , this did not occur in the French replication , in which the production assistant protested about the immorality of the procedure with virtually no effect on levels of obedience .
And unfortunately , not in the Burger study either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an accomplice who refused to continue had no effect on the levels of obedience .
So it may be that we are in fact more compliant today than Milgram ’ s original subjects , unmoved by social support .
A dark thought for our dark times .
In light of Milgram ’ s experiment and the variations by Burger and Dolinski , could we make the conclusion that the individuals wearing masks and social distancing , following the “ presumed ” authority , are the real-life example of Milgram ’ s experiment ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Trump , various State governors , and local office holders are pushing masks , not to mention the public being inundated with television advertisements , print advertisements and audio commercials for mask use , while businesses are attempting to “ mandate ” masks against the law , we are witnessing the “ you must continue ” prompt of Milgram through “ you need to wear a mask ” suggestion .
And , the “ participants ” , the vast numbers of the American populace , have complied .
Some of the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ role of “ mask police ” or “ mask gestapo , ” engaging in verbal and physical assaults on non-mask wearers , because someone with the “ presumed ” authority suggested mask wearing and/or instructed the public to commit unlawful acts against innocent individuals .
Some of the public are even “ snitching ” on individuals who have broken no law because of following a “ presumed ” authority .
Two 21st century variations on Milgram ’ s experiment produced the alarmingly same results , maybe an even higher compliance rate , than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fresh as the atrocities committed by the Nazis in World War II were in the minds of the populace in 1960 , the experiment indicated that research participants would inflict harm and possibly death upon an innocent individual because someone with a “ presumed ” authority ordered it .
What does this say about Americans as a people and a society ?
There is not one society in the world – not one , due to the sinful nature of man , that is immune from committing the atrocities seen in World War @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that sink in for a moment .
So , take this to the next level of the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine .
The “ participants ” will receive the prompts and the vast majority will comply .
But , what about when some “ authority ” , whether Trump , Fauci , Redfield , State governors , local office holders , health department officials , and/or Bill Gates , comes along and declares it to be mandatory ?
Applying the results of Milgram ’ s experiment with the variations by Burger and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be plenty of those “ assigned ” ( 65 % to 70-80 % ) to inject the populace despite their objections , cries , and resistance .
What if the order is given to members of the military by someone who has the authority to command the military – be it Trump directly or a general receiving an order from Trump ?
The ultimate question becomes this – will 65 % to 70-80 % of those given the order to vaccinate the public go so far as to kill an individual who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ order ?
The results of all the experiments say it would happen .
In a different scenario , if the military members were ordered to inject the public with this COVID-19 vaccine and 65 % to 70-80 % complied and the vaccine resulted in the deaths of millions , Milgram ’ s experiment suggested that those compliant in the atrocity would either Obey then justify their actions or obey then blame themselves .
Those who would rebel have already been taken into account .
It would be another “ I was just following @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as I was told ” defense that so many Nazis at the Nuremberg trials used as a defense .
Some may even blame the order giver or the victims themselves .
Stalin never directly killed one Soviet citizen .
Mao never directly killed any Chinese citizen .
Hitler never directly killed one Jew , gypsy , mentally ill , physically disabled , homeless or other individuals of other nationalities or creeds .
Yet , under these three tyrants , millions were murdered .
So , you have to ask yourself , “ Who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a room with ten people , remember that as many as 7 out of 10 would inflict injury , harm or death upon another when given an order by someone in a position of “ presumed ” or “ assumed ” authority .
In other words , only three people in that room would rebel .
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Does anyone remember Stanley Milgram? If not, maybe you remember what has become known as Milgram’s Experiment. The question that should burn in everyone’s mind today, looking around at all the individuals wearing masks and following unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, despotic, tyrannical executive orders by some governors and local municipalities, is “are we witnessing the real practice of Milgram’s conclusion on obedience to authority today”?
In case you are not familiar with Stanley Milgram and his experiment, a brief history is provided.
Stanley Milgram was a 26-year-old social psychologist at Yale University. He started his experiments in 1961, approximately one year after the trial of World War II criminal Adolf Eichmann had begun in order to answer his original question of whether nations other than Germany could or would differ in their degrees of conformity to authority.
To conduct his experiment, Milgram advertised for participants ages 20 to 50 from all walks of life offering to pay the participants $4.50. Milgram hypothesized that Americans, those purveyors of rugged individualism and patriotism, would not easily acquiesce to conformity or inflict harm upon others at someone else’s command. After choosing 40 participants that would be “teachers,” Milgram had some of his associates “act” as learners, with an individual wearing a white coat (experimenter) as the “authority” sitting in the same room with the “teacher”. The “learner” was taken to a separate room, where the “teacher” could not see the individual, and the “learner” was attached to electrodes that would deliver an electric shock at the hand of the “teacher”. What participants (teachers) did not know was the “learner” was not connected to the electrodes that delivered the electric shock.
Behaviorial Scientist detailed the experiment.
In Milgram’s original experiment, participants took part in what they thought was a “learning task.” This task was designed to investigate how punishment—in this case in the form of electric shocks—affected learning. Volunteers thought they were participating in pairs, but their partner was in fact a confederate of the experimenter. A draw to determine who would be the “teacher” and who would be the “learner” was rigged; the true volunteer always ended up as the teacher and the confederate as learner.
The pairs were moved into separate rooms, connected by a microphone. The teacher read aloud a series of word pairs, such as “red–hammer,” which the learner was instructed to memorize. The teacher then read the target word (red), and the learner was to select the original paired word from four alternatives (ocean, fan, hammer, glue).
If the learner erred, the teacher was instructed to deliver an electric shock as punishment, increasing the shock by 15-volt increments with each successive error. Although the teacher could not see the learner in the adjacent room, he could hear his responses to the shocks as well as to the questions. According to a prearranged script, at 75 volts, the learner started to scream; from 150 volts to 330 volts, he protested with increasing intensity, complaining that his heart was bothering him; at 330 volts, he absolutely refused to go on. After that, the teacher’s questions were met by silence. Whenever the teacher hesitated, the experimenter pressed the teacher to continue, insisting that the “the experiment requires that you continue” and reminding him that “although the shocks may be painful, they cause no permanent tissue damage.”
What Milgram discovered was shocking. In this version of the experiment, 65% (26 out of 40 participants) of the subjects “continued to inflict shocks right up to the 450-volt level, despite the learner’s screams, protests, and, at the 330-volt level, disturbing silence.” Once reaching the 450-volt level, the participants obeyed the “experimenter’s” instruction to continue to administer the 450-volt level shocks when the subject failed to respond.
Nature.Berkeley.edu reported on the three categories Milgram divided the participants.
Obeyed but justified themselves. Some obedient participants gave up responsibility for their actions, blaming the experimenter. If anything had happened to the learner, they reasoned, it would have been the experimenter’s fault. Others had transferred the blame to the learner: “He was so stupid and stubborn he deserved to be shocked.”
Obeyed but blamed themselves. Others felt badly about what they had done and were quite harsh on themselves. Members of this group would, perhaps, be more likely to challenge authority if confronted with a similar situation in the future.
Rebelled. Finally, rebellious subjects questioned the authority of the experimenter and argued there was a greater ethical imperative calling for the protection of the learner over the needs of the experimenter. Some of these individuals felt they were accountable to a higher authority.
Why were those who challenged authority in the minority? So entrenched is obedience it may void personal codes of conduct.
It stands to reason there was some question of ethical, moral, and methodological principles of Milgram’s experiment by other psychologists. The subsequent National Research Act of 1974 provided restrictions on the use of human subjects which prevented others from conducting additional experimentation like Milgram’s that would cause participants to experience extreme distress. One of Milgram’s biggest critics was Gina Perry, who uncovered hundreds of audiotapes of Milgram’s experiment in the Yale Archives, and indicated several problems existed with Milgram’s study. However, other studies expanded upon Milgram with similar results.
According to Behavorial Scientist:
Although full replications of Milgram’s experiment are precluded in the United States because of ethical and legal constraints on experimenters, there have been replications attempted in other countries, and attempts by U.S. experimenters to sidestep these constraints.
A replication conducted by Dariusz Dolinski and colleagues in 2015 generated levels of obedience higher than the original Milgram experiment, although the study may be criticized because it employed lower levels of shock.
More intriguing was the 2009 replication by Jerry Burger, who found an ingenious way of navigating the ethical concerns about Milgram’s original experiment. Burger noted that in the original experiment 79 percent of subjects who continued after the 150 volts—after the learner’s first screams—continued all the way to the end of the scale, at 450 volts. Assuming that the same would be true of subjects today, Burger determined how many were willing to deliver shocks beyond the 150-volt level, at which point the experiment was discontinued.
About 70 percent were willing to continue the experiment at this point, suggesting that subjects remain just as compliant in the 21st century. Nonetheless, Burger’s study was based upon a questionable assumption, namely that 150-volt compliance has remained a reliable predictor of 450-volt compliance. Subjects today might be willing to go a bit beyond 150 volts, but perhaps not to the far end of the scale (after learners demand that the experiment be discontinued etc.). In fact, this assumption begs the critical question at issue.
However, French television came to the rescue. One game show replicated Milgram’s experiment, with the game show host as the authority and the “questioner” as the subject. In a study reported in the 2012 European Review of Applied Psychology, J.-L. Beauvois and colleagues replicated Milgram’s voice feedback condition, with identical props, instructions, and scripted learner responses and host prods. One might question whether a game show host has as much authority as a scientific experimenter, but whatever authority they had managed to elicit levels of obedience equivalent to Milgram’s original experiment (in fact somewhat higher, 81 percent as opposed to the original 65 percent). It would seem that at least French nationals are as compliant today as Milgram’s original subjects in the 1960s.
In fact, the replication suggests a darker picture. One of optimistic findings of the original Milgram experiment was his condition 7, in which there were three teachers, two of whom (both confederates of the experimenter) defied the experimenter. Given this social support, most subjects refused to continue to administer shocks, suggesting that social solidarity serves as a kind of a defense against destructive obedience to authority. Unfortunately, this did not occur in the French replication, in which the production assistant protested about the immorality of the procedure with virtually no effect on levels of obedience. And unfortunately, not in the Burger study either: Burger found that the intervention of an accomplice who refused to continue had no effect on the levels of obedience. So it may be that we are in fact more compliant today than Milgram’s original subjects, unmoved by social support. A dark thought for our dark times.
In light of Milgram’s experiment and the variations by Burger and Dolinski, could we make the conclusion that the individuals wearing masks and social distancing, following the “presumed” authority, are the real-life example of Milgram’s experiment? Considering how many times Dr. Anthony Fauci, Trump, various State governors, and local office holders are pushing masks, not to mention the public being inundated with television advertisements, print advertisements and audio commercials for mask use, while businesses are attempting to “mandate” masks against the law, we are witnessing the “you must continue” prompt of Milgram through “you need to wear a mask” suggestion. And, the “participants”, the vast numbers of the American populace, have complied.
Some of the public, in general, has assumed the role of “mask police” or “mask gestapo,” engaging in verbal and physical assaults on non-mask wearers, because someone with the “presumed” authority suggested mask wearing and/or instructed the public to commit unlawful acts against innocent individuals. Some of the public are even “snitching” on individuals who have broken no law because of following a “presumed” authority.
Two 21st century variations on Milgram’s experiment produced the alarmingly same results, maybe an even higher compliance rate, than Milgram’s original experiment. As fresh as the atrocities committed by the Nazis in World War II were in the minds of the populace in 1960, the experiment indicated that research participants would inflict harm and possibly death upon an innocent individual because someone with a “presumed” authority ordered it.
What does this say about Americans as a people and a society? There is not one society in the world – not one, due to the sinful nature of man, that is immune from committing the atrocities seen in World War II perpetrated by the Nazis. Let that sink in for a moment.
So, take this to the next level of the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine. The “participants” will receive the prompts and the vast majority will comply. But, what about when some “authority”, whether Trump, Fauci, Redfield, State governors, local office holders, health department officials, and/or Bill Gates, comes along and declares it to be mandatory? Applying the results of Milgram’s experiment with the variations by Burger and Dolinski, one can be assured there will be plenty of those “assigned” (65% to 70-80%) to inject the populace despite their objections, cries, and resistance.
What if the order is given to members of the military by someone who has the authority to command the military – be it Trump directly or a general receiving an order from Trump? The ultimate question becomes this – will 65% to 70-80% of those given the order to vaccinate the public go so far as to kill an individual who forcefully resists if the command contains that order? The results of all the experiments say it would happen.
In a different scenario, if the military members were ordered to inject the public with this COVID-19 vaccine and 65% to 70-80% complied and the vaccine resulted in the deaths of millions, Milgram’s experiment suggested that those compliant in the atrocity would either Obey then justify their actions or obey then blame themselves. Those who would rebel have already been taken into account. It would be another “I was just following orders” or “I was doing as I was told” defense that so many Nazis at the Nuremberg trials used as a defense. Some may even blame the order giver or the victims themselves.
Stalin never directly killed one Soviet citizen. Mao never directly killed any Chinese citizen. Hitler never directly killed one Jew, gypsy, mentally ill, physically disabled, homeless or other individuals of other nationalities or creeds. Yet, under these three tyrants, millions were murdered. So, you have to ask yourself, “Who dunnit?” Next time you are in a room with ten people, remember that as many as 7 out of 10 would inflict injury, harm or death upon another when given an order by someone in a position of “presumed” or “assumed” authority. In other words, only three people in that room would rebel.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-08-04--Greg Mannarino:  The Fed Is “Trying To Kill What’s Left Of The Middle Class… This Is All By Design”

Greg Mannarino : The Fed Is “ Trying To Kill What ’ s Left Of The Middle Class… This Is All By Design ” The Federal Reserve , with the help of their puppets in the government , is trying to kill what ’ s left of the middle class .
This should be obvious by now , and yet people are still walking around more afraid of a virus than opening their eyes to what ’ s happening .
Who would have thought a face mask over the mouth and nose would cause such epic blindness .
Greg Mannarino @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Federal Reserve for years now .
It ’ s all coming to fruition , and in order to own the world , they must eliminate the middle class .
They are going for small businesses and have 50 % of those gone already .
“ Maybe they ’ re going for , I don ’ t know , 75 , 100 % , while corporate American , right now is stronger than it ’ s ever been !
” Wake up , people .
This is all by design .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rule the entire world .
It ’ s in our face and it ’ s no shock , adds Mannarino of the corporations and government merging together via the Federal Reserve .
They are no longer hiding the agenda .
There will be no middle class in the New World Order .
They need poverty-stricken slaves only , while they sit at the top and rule to the world .
It ’ s pretty sad that most people still haven ’ t figured it out yet and will go cast a ballot in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t already selected the puppet they will use for the next four years .
The only reason there are two political parties is to give people the illusion of choice .
This should go without saying , but so many are still stuck in a paradigm that will wholly enslave and impoverish them unless they wake up to it , and soon !
It ’ s “ critical ” to use Mannarino ’ s word .
Basically , we don ’ t control the outcome of elections .
The central banks do .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reserve sees Biden as being more “ on board ” with their epic distribution of debt and credit , he WILL be the next president .
Trump could still be reelected because he ’ s been incredibly effective at helping the central bank take over the planet .
–SHTFPlan Trump Is A Pied Piper For The New World Order Agenda Pay attention to what ’ s happening .
It ’ s all in front of our faces now .
This process of controlled demolition needs a considerable distraction so that the central banks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the painful consequences of the event .
Enter Donald Trump and the false Trump vs. Globalist paradigm .
As I mentioned last week , the Fed is only one side of the equation for the crash ; Trump is the other side .
After two years of witnessing Trump in action , it is clear to me that he is an active participant in the new world order agenda , and not just an unwitting patsy for the economic crisis.-Brandon Smith However this plays out , it was all set up this way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a contested election and overwhelming societal dysfunction regardless of which puppet the Federal Reserveselects for the illusionary throne .
Take off the left vs. right paradigm glasses that are being used to divide and distract and look around clearly while applying critical thinking .
The Pentagon & CDC Will Join Together To Mass Distribute The COVID Vaccine MSM Frenzy : Trump Floats The Idea Of Delaying The Election The election in November could be the start of massive uprisings , no matter which puppet the Federal Reserve has selected , and it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The puppets are already beginning their dog and pony show and dancing for the public on command .
If you feel the desire to protect your wealth , you still can ’ t beat gold and silver .
Other than that , have a lot of a third metal , lead , on hand .

Greg Mannarino: The Fed Is “Trying To Kill What’s Left Of The Middle Class… This Is All By Design”
The Federal Reserve, with the help of their puppets in the government, is trying to kill what’s left of the middle class. This should be obvious by now, and yet people are still walking around more afraid of a virus than opening their eyes to what’s happening.
Who would have thought a face mask over the mouth and nose would cause such epic blindness. Greg Mannarino has been pointing out the goals of the Federal Reserve for years now. It’s all coming to fruition, and in order to own the world, they must eliminate the middle class.
They are going for small businesses and have 50% of those gone already. “Maybe they’re going for, I don’t know, 75, 100%, while corporate American, right now is stronger than it’s ever been!” Wake up, people. This is all by design. It’s a century-old plan to own and rule the entire world.
It’s in our face and it’s no shock, adds Mannarino of the corporations and government merging together via the Federal Reserve. They are no longer hiding the agenda. There will be no middle class in the New World Order. They need poverty-stricken slaves only, while they sit at the top and rule to the world. It’s pretty sad that most people still haven’t figured it out yet and will go cast a ballot in November thinking the Federal Reserve hasn’t already selected the puppet they will use for the next four years.
The only reason there are two political parties is to give people the illusion of choice. This should go without saying, but so many are still stuck in a paradigm that will wholly enslave and impoverish them unless they wake up to it, and soon! It’s “critical” to use Mannarino’s word. Basically, we don’t control the outcome of elections. The central banks do. If for one second, the Federal Reserve sees Biden as being more “on board” with their epic distribution of debt and credit, he WILL be the next president. Trump could still be reelected because he’s been incredibly effective at helping the central bank take over the planet. –SHTFPlan
Trump Is A Pied Piper For The New World Order Agenda
Pay attention to what’s happening. It’s all in front of our faces now.
This process of controlled demolition needs a considerable distraction so that the central banks and the globalists ultimately avoid blame for the painful consequences of the event. Enter Donald Trump and the false Trump vs. Globalist paradigm. As I mentioned last week, the Fed is only one side of the equation for the crash; Trump is the other side. After two years of witnessing Trump in action, it is clear to me that he is an active participant in the new world order agenda, and not just an unwitting patsy for the economic crisis.-Brandon Smith
However this plays out, it was all set up this way. The set up has begun for a contested election and overwhelming societal dysfunction regardless of which puppet the Federal Reserveselects for the illusionary throne. Take off the left vs. right paradigm glasses that are being used to divide and distract and look around clearly while applying critical thinking.
The Pentagon & CDC Will Join Together To Mass Distribute The COVID Vaccine
MSM Frenzy: Trump Floats The Idea Of Delaying The Election
The election in November could be the start of massive uprisings, no matter which puppet the Federal Reserve has selected, and it’s set up that way already. The puppets are already beginning their dog and pony show and dancing for the public on command.
If you feel the desire to protect your wealth, you still can’t beat gold and silver. Other than that, have a lot of a third metal, lead, on hand.
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-08-04--Providing the Data Of The Coronavirus Hoax In The UK Will Get A Doctor Suspended

The Sons of Liberty ’ s health and wellness expert , Kate Shemirani , a nurse of more than 35 years and a nutritionist was recently suspended for 18 months without anyone hearing her evidence and scientific documentation regarding coronavirus/COVID-19 .
However , Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Adil , a Fellow of The Royal College of Surgeons of U.K. , Consultant General , Colorectal , Laparoscopic & Breast Cancer Surgeon was suspended for 12 months for calling the coronavirus a h*o*a*x .
He joins me in this episode .
Here ’ s the information that Dr. Adil spoke about that got @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s episode , as well as additional information provided by Dr. Adil , including an article he recently wrote .
Mishandling of the recent COVID -19 pandemics in the world Was lockdown necessary ?
Could we had done better ?
Government of U.K. put complete lockdown on 23 March after recommendations of the SAGE , U.K. ( Scientific advisory group of emergencies UK ) which resulted in devastating impacts on the public personal and social lives abd collapsed the economy to 14 % which is equal to 3 centuries .
Serious mishandling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ millions of patients waiting for their investigations and treatment .
Two third of the elderly people in the nursing homes died due to COVID 19 related or other ongoing health issues .
Vast number of elderly patients admitted in U.K. hospitals were transferred to the nursing and elderly care homes as a result of total lockdown and expected admission of the patients due to with the COVID -19 in the hospitals as advised by the SAGE .
Neil Fergusson , Imperial college London , chief scientist of the SAGE advisory committee to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that In U.K.8 million people would be admitted into the Hispital due to COVID-19 infection and 500,000 would die if lockdown not carried out in Uk .
On his recommendation complete lockdown was implemented in U.K. on 23/03/2020 .
U.K. Government said this was “ Once in a century pandemic “ .
But It turned out to be “ once in a century evidence fiasco “ with devastating effects on the public personsl & social lives , business , education , health and health services and economy .
NHS England sent alerts ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trusts and health organisation to over 1000 Trusts & Private hospitals in U.K. following • To Vacate all the beds which are approximately over 125000 including private hospitals in U.K. • It was also advised that Patients who were slightly stable conditions in the hospitals were discharged from the hospitals or transferred to the nursing / care homes in order to evacuate beds for the expected COVID-19 patients .
• 30,000 elderly patients were transferred to the nursing and care homes in the month of March 2020 and afterwards .
• Regular & @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the hospitals to support the pandemic .
• All elective major or minor operations including cancers investigations and operations were seized off .
• All investigations and treatment for benign & malignant cancers were seized off • All the elective outpatients clinics were seized for indefinite period • All the endoscopies , scans and blood tests were cancelled or kept on hold • Special precautions were issued to the health professionals and trusts to adopt the policy of conservative to non operative surgery .
• Parient with mild to moderate Covid-19 symptoms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ isolation for two weeks .However patients with severe symptoms were advised to ring 111/999 or report to hospital for admission .
• Special training was given to all the staff to deal with the pandemics of the COVID-19 including Special operation theatre protocols issued with minimum interaction and exposure of staff with the patient and body fluids anesthesiologist and aerosols .
• Special wards arrangements were made for the suspected and confirmed COVID-19 patients .
• Special instructions for issuing the death certificates and release of dead bodies .
Surprisingly the rate of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expected and advised by the SAGE group of scientists in U.K. resulting 60-70 beds in all hospitals and trusts lying vacant which resulted a serious waste of resources and time .
At least half of the regular staff in hospitals went on sick leave due to health issues and position was filled by the “ Locum Workers “ on higher rates .
Patients are relatives were advised to stay home .
With clapping for the NHS staff on every Thursday .
But unfortunately this did not help those patients who were deprived of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home .
This has been detrimental to the millions of sick and unwell patients waiting for their investigations and treatments which was kept on hold during the period of the lockdown .
According to the NHS figures the waiting list of patients waiting for their investigations and treatments in January 2020 was 2.7 million patients and out of that 780,000 patients were on 18/52 wait rule in U.K. .
Due to lockdown and restriction on public figures of patients waiting for their investigations and treatment is 5 millions in U.K. and NHS would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the good infra structure .
Most of the deaths were due to the total lockdown , isolation , fear and depression rather than corona virus infection itself .
Many people died at their 2/3 of the elderly died in nursing homes around the world 1.8 billion students in the world lost their education .
, damaging to their health and wellbeing .
The effects were more devastating in the third world and underprivileged countries which were already below the poverty line and under the debts of the World Bank & IMF .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Dr John Ioannidis says for people younger than age 45 , the infection fatality rate is ZERO !
!
!
And , for people age 45 to 70 , the infection fatality rate is probably about 0.05-0.3 % , historically similar to other seasonal respiratory viruses .
However , fatality rate for frail nursing home patients may be as high as 25 % .
False impression of test positive who are actually not infected unless they get serious symptoms which requires isolation to admission depending on their symptoms .
RT-PCR has 60-80 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ false negative .
It means false positive may not be true positive and false negative may not be true negatives .
“ I feel extremely sad that my predictions were verified .
“ Major consequences on the economy , society and mental health ” have already occurred .
I hope they are reversible , and this depends to a large extent on whether we can avoid prolonging the draconian lockdowns and manage to deal with COVID-19 in a smart , precision-risk targeted approach , rather than blindly shutting down everything .
Similarly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consequences of “ financial crisis , unrest , and civil strife.
” I hope it is not followed by “ war and meltdown of the social fabric.
” “ Globally , the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion , and they are putting at risk millions of lives , with the potential resurgence of tuberculosis , childhood diseases … , and malaria .
I hope that policymakers look at the big picture of all the potential problems and not only on the very important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is COVID-19.
” The evidence suggests that countries who have not done lockdown and cease their economy and education have done better than the countries who have put the lockdown and far reaching restrictions on the public .
Recently Mr Vallance in his interview to the mainstream media and “ independent News Uk “ on the exaggerated corona virus deaths in U.K. by Public Health England ( PHE ) .
“ UK corona virus outcome has not been good He added , “ Clearly it ’ s a learning point and we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chris Witty did ” .
He further said , “ Its very difficult to say where we stand at the moment but it ’ s clear that the outcome has not been good in Uk .
In fact Uk has done less well than than others “ .
Matt Hancock , the health secretary has ordered an urgent review with how the Corona virus daily deaths were counted by the PHE which prompted the Corona Virus death figures in U.K. if the people die of any other cause .
We now live in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
On one hand we have people obediently watching the nightly news who believe what they hear and see on the television .
These people are fearful of viruses and want government protection with “ security measures ” that coincidentally abolish constitutional rights and liberties .
For example , the right to work and make a living , and the right to assemble in a house of worship are among many that have been abolished .
These “ fearful ” people are not concerned about the economic consequences of 40 million people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be millions living out of cardboard boxes on the sidewalk because they can not pay their rent .
5 millions are unemployed in U.K. and 40 millions in USA , much more in poor and underprivileged countries .
On the other hand , there are people who are not fearful , and who do not watch the nightly news .
These people do not want government protection from a virus with the far reaching effects on their personsl , family and employment lives .
These people want the government to stop interfering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a living to support their families .
They want to have their constitutional rights and liberties restored .
There is awakening call for the civil liberty , freedom and restoration of public fundamental rights in various protests .
Protests in USA and UK are exemplary for the public desperation in the last 4 months lockdowns and its effects .
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) , there were 2,813,503 registered deaths in the United States in 2017 .
The age-adjusted death rate , which accounts for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100,000 people in the U.S .
This is an increase of 0.4 % over 2016 ’ s death rate .
4 Jul 2019 The similar figures did the leading cause of death exists in U.K. Health services have been treating only Corona Virus ( COVID-19 ) and nothing else which caused the neglect of the patients other than corona virus for their investigations and treatment .
That why I think the recent pandemic has not been addressed properly .
There has not been any round table discussion among the scientists , epidemiologists , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ across the respective countries and the world to handle the health crisis promptly , efficiently and competently across the world resulting in devastating health and economical crisis .
Few health professionals including myself blew the whistle regarding the health crisis , crippling economy , social and domestic issues , mental health issues , they have been silenced , censored , suspended and penalised .
I was suspended for a period of 12 months by the GMC on 01 June 2020 for supporting the cause of the humanity .
I had no intention to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I merely felt obliged to contribute in the recent overall crisis in a positive way by collecting data and the facts into perspectives for the mankind which wasn ’ t appreciated by the General medical council .
Similarly many health professionals have been silenced and lost their jobs in the given scenario .
Recently Web hosting platform Squarespace has shut down the website of America ’ s Frontline Doctors – a group of doctors who have come together to address what they describe as “ a massive disinformation campaign regarding COVID-19 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Youtube and other social media also took down their viral video claiming misinformation .
The press conference went viral on social media , accumulated tens of millions of views within the first eight hours of it going live .
Treatment options for COVID-19 should have been debated and spoken about among the medical colleagues and experts .
Its non of the business of the politicians , leaders or mainstream media to propagate misinformation about a health issues and treatment without consulting with the medical experts across the country .
They have saved NHS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crisis , insufficient medical treatment and fear .
The medical professionals have been working selflessly for the best interest of the patients therefore , they should never be censored , shut , suspended and silenced .
Diversity of thoughts , experience and skills reflects better outcome in all fields of medical sciences and plays a key role in innovation and advancement which should always be welcomed .
It ’ s horrendous to shut down a door of wisdom and opinion by the experienced medical professionals across the world working for the good cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leadership in the world .
People are confused , depressed , anxious , uncertain .
Public need direction , guidance and sincere encouragement and support .
Its not the jurisdiction of the politicians , leaders or mainstream media to impose the treatment plans on a health issues without taking an account of the diversity of approach by the experts health professionals and peer reviews .
In fact governments and world leaders across the world should have had a round table debate and discussion with the experienced health professionals to find the best possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , s for the public health issues .
Fauci and Bill Gate plans for vaccinating 7.6 Billion people across the world is ludicrous and immoral .
It ’ s nothing more than generating money by the biggest pharmaceutical joints for making profits .
People who are opposing vaccine have some logic and they are not NUTS .
Previous experience reveals untoward side effects of vaccination resulting in deaths , paralysis , infertility , autism , dementia , Alzheimer ’ s disease , MS , Parkinson ’ s disease etc .
The number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increased from In 1974 one in 5000 In 1990 one in 500 In 2000 one in 166 In 2011 one in 80 In 2013 one in 70 In 2018 one in 68 In 2019 one in 55 In 2020 , the CDC reported that approximately 1 in 50 children in the U.S. is diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) .
Boys are four times more likely to be diagnosed with autism than girls .
The incidence has gone sharply higher since the last decade of vaccine ( from 2011-2020 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the UK only may be autistic , an estimate derived from the 1.1 % prevalence rate applied to the 2011 UK census figures .
Therefore , pharmaceutical companies who are promoting vaccinating the entire world population should clarify the contents and the gradients used in vaccines which is a serious cause for concerns .
How dare are they trying to convince the world population with the orchestrated campaign in promoting vaccine as a treatment in the given health issues ?
They are advising that lockdown , face masking and social distancing are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and is injected into all the people in the world as a cure ?
People of the world know very well that Vaccine is not a treatment but has been used as a prophylaxis for some common diseases in the past .
If there has not been any vaccine for Spanish Flue virus in 1918 There won ’ t be any vaccine for the SARS2 as virus has mutated significantly with different strains in different parts of the world therefore there won ’ t be any particular vaccine useful for everywhere .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as per figures above .
There is evidence that face masks are not good for everyone .
Face masks are more harmful than benefits to health , as face mask block oxygen and generate Co2 which we rebreathing causes hypoxia , hyperaemia , confusion , headaches and delirium due to rebreathing and accumulation of Co2 .
Face masks are only helpful while someone is coughing or have severe chest infection to protect others .
They are also useful during surgical or medical procedures by the health professionals to protect patients .
Is social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also reduces our immunity .
Also controversial in treating patients .
They are doing more harm than benefits as multiple studies have proved .
Only 4-5 % patients with the COVID -19 require ITU admission and ventilations .
Trend is towards non invasive positive pressure ventilation rather than invasive procedures .
I believe on equality , justice , mutual respect , equal opportunity regardless of colour , race , religion , language , individuality .
Nobody should be discriminated on the basis of rich or poor with abundant or limited resources .
Many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we need to support them in their difficult time .
Ethnic minority / ethnic majority .
I would not have been here had I considered that .
We should be standing on the basis of the humanity without any monetary or political gain .
We are here neither to play down the virus nor any political gain but we are here to look into the far reaching effects of the virus and lockdown causing serious atrocities across the world .
We need to reassure public in UK and across the world to reassure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reduce poverty , recommence business and trade to boast the crippling economy and students to get back to their school to resume their education .
We all are born equal from Adam , all are brothers and sisters .
We have to protect everyone .
Online education , online shopping , online medical treatment , online business , online congresses and online meetings , on line college and universities ?
If that ’ s the future then how are we going to develop strong leadership ?
How our new generation would gain confidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world ?
.
I believe on equality , unity , love , mutual respect , peace and tranquility without discrimination of borders , areas , colour , groups , cast , money , race , religion , individuality and boundaries as every life matters .
Mishandling of the recent COVID -19 pandemics in the world resulted in serious health , economical crisis , social and mental issues due to the lockdown .
A critical approach for future learning is necessary to learn a good lesson .
Our country is teetering on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ruled by fear ?
The lockdown should be released in stages in a sensible way to let the crippling economy boast up .The business and employment to be encouraged .
Waiting lists in hospitals be looked into to investigate and treat patients to clear the backlog .
Children and students should go back to school , colleges and universities to resume their education .
It ’ s the duty of the world leaders , governments , politicians and the health professionals to get public out of overwhelming fear , anxiety and depression in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ men and women abd the health professionals standing up for their freedom , liberty and fundamental across the world .
If we are worried about the mortality rate from a virus , just think about this and compare with the above figures which reflects the mortality rate every year .
1 ) Medically reviewed by by on July 4 , 2019 2 ) A fiasco in the making ?
As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold , we are making decisions without reliable data .
By John P.A .
Ioannidis March 17 , 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 300 Million People May Be Infected by Covid-19 , Stanford Guru John Ioannidis Says .
By Patricia Claus – Jun 27 , 2020 Dr. Ioannidis : 0.05 % to 1 % is a reasonable range for what the data tell us now for the infection fatality rate , with a median of about 0.25 % .
The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure , who are the people infected , and how they are managed .
For people younger than 45 , the infection fatality rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 70 , it is probably about 0.05-0.3 % .
For those above 70 , it escalates substantially , to 1 % or higher for those over 85 .
For frail , debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes , it can go up to 25 % during major outbreaks in these facilities .
Dr. Ioannidis : I feel extremely sad that my predictions were verified .
“ Major consequences on the economy , society and mental health ” have already occurred .
I hope they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ large extent on whether we can avoid prolonging the draconian lockdowns and manage to deal with COVID-19 in a smart , precision-risk targeted approach , rather than blindly shutting down everything .
Similarly , we have already started to see the consequences of “ financial crisis , unrest , and civil strife.
” I hope it is not followed by “ war and meltdown of the social fabric.
” Globally , the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion , and they are putting at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potential resurgence of tuberculosis , childhood diseases like measles where vaccination programs are disrupted , and malaria .
I hope that policymakers look at the big picture of all the potential problems and not only on the very important , but relatively thin slice of evidence that is COVID-19 .
4 ) Stanford ’ s John P.A .
Ioannidis — co-director of the university ’ s Meta-Research Innovation Center and professor of medicine response to the coronavirus pandemic may be “ a fiasco in the making ” because we are making seismic decisions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The data we do have , Ioannidis explains , indicates that we are likely severely overreacting .
“ The current coronavirus disease , Covid-19 , has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic .
But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco , ”

The Sons of Liberty’s health and wellness expert, Kate Shemirani, a nurse of more than 35 years and a nutritionist was recently suspended for 18 months without anyone hearing her evidence and scientific documentation regarding coronavirus/COVID-19. However, Dr. Mohammad Iqbal Adil, a Fellow of The Royal College of Surgeons of U.K., Consultant General, Colorectal, Laparoscopic & Breast Cancer Surgeon was suspended for 12 months for calling the coronavirus a h*o*a*x. He joins me in this episode.
Here’s the information that Dr. Adil spoke about that got him suspended.
Articles mentioned in today’s episode, as well as additional information provided by Dr. Adil, including an article he recently wrote.
Dr. Adil’s article.
Mishandling of the recent COVID -19 pandemics in the world
Was lockdown necessary ? Could we had done better ?
A critical approach for future learning
Summary .
Government of U.K. put complete lockdown on 23 March after recommendations of the SAGE, U.K. ( Scientific advisory group of emergencies UK ) which resulted in devastating impacts on the public personal and social lives abd collapsed the economy to 14 % which is equal to 3 centuries .
Serious mishandling of the health care system deprived of millions of patients waiting for their investigations and treatment .
Two third of the elderly people in the nursing homes died due to COVID 19 related or other ongoing health issues .
Vast number of elderly patients admitted in U.K. hospitals were transferred to the nursing and elderly care homes as a result of total lockdown and expected admission of the patients due to with the COVID -19 in the hospitals as advised by the SAGE .
On March 17 , 2020
Biological mathematical model introduced by
Neil Fergusson, Imperial college London , chief scientist of the SAGE advisory committee to the U.K. government advised to the UK government that
In U.K.8 million people would be admitted into the Hispital due to COVID-19 infection and
500,000 would die if lockdown not carried out in Uk .
On his recommendation complete lockdown was implemented in U.K. on 23/03/2020 .
U.K. Government said this was “ Once in a century pandemic “ .
But It turned out to be “ once in a century evidence fiasco “ with devastating effects on the public personsl & social lives , business, education , health and health services and economy .
NHS England sent alerts ( documents) to all the Country wide Trusts and health organisation to over 1000 Trusts & Private hospitals in U.K. following
To Vacate all the beds which are approximately over 125000 including private hospitals in U.K. It was also advised that Patients who were slightly stable conditions in the hospitals were discharged from the hospitals or transferred to the nursing / care homes in order to evacuate beds for the expected COVID-19 patients .
30,000 elderly patients were transferred to the nursing and care homes in the month of March 2020 and afterwards . Regular & retired Staff were called in to work in the hospitals to support the pandemic. All elective major or minor operations including cancers investigations and operations were seized off . All investigations and treatment for benign & malignant cancers were seized off All the elective outpatients clinics were seized for indefinite period All the endoscopies , scans and blood tests were cancelled or kept on hold Special precautions were issued to the health professionals and trusts to adopt the policy of conservative to non operative surgery .
Parient with mild to moderate Covid-19 symptoms were advised to stay at home in isolation for two weeks .However patients with severe symptoms were advised to ring 111/999 or report to hospital for admission . Special training was given to all the staff to deal with the pandemics of the COVID-19 including
FIT test
PPE
Donning & Duffing
Ventilators support and resuscitations
Special operation theatre protocols issued with minimum interaction and exposure of staff with the patient and body fluids anesthesiologist and aerosols .
However , Emergency services remained open with special management protocols . Special wards arrangements were made for the suspected and confirmed COVID-19 patients . Special instructions for issuing the death certificates and release of dead bodies .
Surprisingly the rate of admission was not dramatically as large as expected and advised by the SAGE group of scientists in U.K. resulting 60-70 beds in all hospitals and trusts lying vacant which resulted a serious waste of resources and time .
At least half of the regular staff in hospitals went on sick leave due to health issues and position was filled by the “ Locum Workers “on higher rates .
Patients are relatives were advised to stay home .
Popular Slogan
Stay Home. Protect NHS. Save lives
With clapping for the NHS staff on every Thursday.
But unfortunately this did not help those patients who were deprived of their investigations and treatment while staying at home .
This has been detrimental to the millions of sick and unwell patients waiting for their investigations and treatments which was kept on hold during the period of the lockdown .
According to the NHS figures the waiting list of patients waiting for their investigations and treatments in January 2020 was 2.7 million patients and out of that 780,000 patients were on 18/52 wait rule in U.K. .
Due to lockdown and restriction on public figures of patients waiting for their investigations and treatment is 5 millions in U.K. and NHS would require 5 years to clear the lot with the good infra structure .
Effects of the lockdown
Most of the deaths were due to the total lockdown , isolation , fear and depression rather than corona virus infection itself . Many people died at their
Homes
Nursing homes due to insufficient health facilities available
Loss of Employments , jobs
Mental health
Business collapsed
Small, medium and large industries collapsed
Social & domestic issues
Psychological , domestic violence, abuse , loneliness , isolation , anxiety , depression , travelling , livelihood .
Resulting
Suicides , deaths and misery
Uncertainty, fear , starvation
1.1 billion starvation , poverty
2/3 of the elderly died in nursing homes around the world
1.8 billion students in the world lost their education. , damaging to their health and wellbeing.
The effects were more devastating in the third world and underprivileged countries which were already below the poverty line and under the debts of the World Bank & IMF .
Infection Rate / Death Rate
Regarding the infection fatality rate, remarkably, Dr John Ioannidis says for people younger than age 45, the infection fatality rate is ZERO !!! And, for people age 45 to 70, the infection fatality rate is probably about 0.05-0.3%, historically similar to other seasonal respiratory viruses.
However, fatality rate for frail nursing home patients may be as high as 25%.
Test positive / negative people
RT-PCR , blood tests , CT scan
False impression of test positive who are actually not infected unless they get serious symptoms which requires isolation to admission depending on their symptoms
. RT-PCR has 60-80% of false positive and 40-50 % false negative . It means false positive may not be true positive and false negative may not be true negatives.
Effects of lockdown
“I feel extremely sad that my predictions were verified. “Major consequences on the economy, society and mental health” have already occurred. I hope they are reversible, and this depends to a large extent on whether we can avoid prolonging the draconian lockdowns and manage to deal with COVID-19 in a smart, precision-risk targeted approach, rather than blindly shutting down everything.
Similarly, we have already started to see the consequences of “financial crisis, unrest, and civil strife.” I hope it is not followed by “war and meltdown of the social fabric.”
Effects of the Lockdown
Dr John Ioannidis , Epidemiologist from Stanford University said ,
“Globally, the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion, and they are putting at risk millions of lives, with the potential resurgence of tuberculosis, childhood diseases …, and malaria. I hope that policymakers look at the big picture of all the potential problems and not only on the very important, but relatively thin slice of evidence that is COVID-19.”
The evidence suggests that countries who have not done lockdown and cease their economy and education have done better than the countries who have put the lockdown and far reaching restrictions on the public .
Recently Mr Vallance in his interview to the mainstream media and “independent News Uk “ on the exaggerated corona virus deaths in U.K. by Public Health England ( PHE) .
“ UK corona virus outcome has not been good He added , “ Clearly it’s a learning point and we get cooperation from our International partners as Chris Witty did” .
He further said , “ Its very difficult to say where we stand at the moment but it’s clear that the outcome has not been good in Uk .
In fact Uk has done less well than than others “ .
Matt Hancock , the health secretary has ordered an urgent review with how the Corona virus daily deaths were counted by the PHE which prompted the Corona Virus death figures in U.K. if the people die of any other cause .
Polarisation of the Society
We now live in a polarized society of two types of people. On one hand we have people obediently watching the nightly news who believe what they hear and see on the television. These people are fearful of viruses and want government protection with “security measures” that coincidentally abolish constitutional rights and liberties.
For example, the right to work and make a living, and the right to assemble in a house of worship are among many that have been abolished. These “fearful” people are not concerned about the economic consequences of 40 million people collecting unemployment payments. Or the soon to be millions living out of cardboard boxes on the sidewalk because they can not pay their rent.
5 millions are unemployed in U.K. and 40 millions in USA , much more in poor and underprivileged countries .
On the other hand, there are people who are not fearful, and who do not watch the nightly news. These people do not want government protection from a virus with the far reaching effects on their personsl , family and employment lives .
These people want the government to stop interfering in their right to work and make a living to support their families. They want to have their constitutional rights and liberties restored.
USA , Europe, UK, other countries
There is awakening call for the civil liberty , freedom and restoration of public fundamental rights in various protests .
Yesterday 1.3 million people marched across Berlin , Germany .
Protests in USA and UK are exemplary for the public desperation in the last 4 months lockdowns and its effects .
Mortality figures in USA
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were 2,813,503 registered deaths in the United States in 2017. The age-adjusted death rate, which accounts for the aging population, is 731.9 deaths per 100,000 people in the U.S. This is an increase of 0.4% over 2016’s death rate. 4 Jul 2019
Heart Attack Deaths due to Heart attacks in 2017: 647,457 Percentage of total deaths: 23.5%
2. Cancer
Deaths in 2017: 599,108
Percentage of total deaths: 21.3%
3. Unintentional injuries
Deaths in 2017: 169,936
Percentage of total deaths: 6%
4. Chronic lower respiratory disease
Deaths in 2017: 160,201
Percentage of total deaths: 5.7%
Strokes
Deaths in 2017: 146,383
Percentage of total deaths: 5.2%
6. Alzheimer’s disease
Deaths in 2017: 121,404
Percentage of total deaths: 4.3%
7. Diabetes
Deaths in 2017: 83,564
Percentage of total deaths: 3%
8. Influenza and pneumonia
Deaths in 2017: 55,672
Percentage of total deaths: 2%
The similar figures did the leading cause of death exists in U.K.
Health services have been treating only Corona Virus ( COVID-19 ) and nothing else which caused the neglect of the patients other than corona virus for their investigations and treatment . That why I think the recent pandemic has not been addressed properly .
There has not been any round table discussion among the scientists , epidemiologists, infectious disease experts , physicians and surgeon across the respective countries and the world to handle the health crisis promptly , efficiently and competently across the world resulting in devastating health and economical crisis.
Negative Impact .
Few health professionals including myself blew the whistle regarding the health crisis , crippling economy , social and domestic issues , mental health issues , they have been silenced , censored , suspended and penalised .
I was suspended for a period of 12 months by the GMC on 01 June 2020 for supporting the cause of the humanity . I had no intention to play down the virus or politicise it . I merely felt obliged to contribute in the recent overall crisis in a positive way by collecting data and the facts into perspectives for the mankind which wasn’t appreciated by the General medical council .
Similarly many health professionals have been silenced and lost their jobs in the given scenario.
Recently Web hosting platform Squarespace has shut down the website of America’s Frontline Doctors – a group of doctors who have come together to address what they describe as “a massive disinformation campaign regarding COVID-19 .
Soon after that Facebook , Twitter , Youtube and other social media also took down their viral video claiming misinformation.
The press conference went viral on social media, accumulated tens of millions of views within the first eight hours of it going live .
Role of the Health Professionals .
Treatment options for COVID-19 should have been debated and spoken about among the medical colleagues and experts . Its non of the business of the politicians , leaders or mainstream media to propagate misinformation about a health issues and treatment without consulting with the medical experts across the country.
Slogan
Stay home – Protect NHS – Steve lives
They have saved NHS but public has suffered due to health crisis , insufficient medical treatment and fear .
The medical professionals have been working selflessly for the best interest of the patients therefore, they should never be censored , shut , suspended and silenced .
Diversity of thoughts , experience and skills reflects better outcome in all fields of medical sciences and plays a key role in innovation and advancement which should always be welcomed .
It’s horrendous to shut down a door of wisdom and opinion by the experienced medical professionals across the world working for the good cause for the humanity selflessly .
Lack of leadership in the world . People are confused , depressed , anxious , uncertain .
Public need direction , guidance and sincere encouragement and support .
Its not the jurisdiction of the politicians , leaders or mainstream media to impose the treatment plans on a health issues without taking an account of the diversity of approach by the experts health professionals and peer reviews .
Scientific Congress and Guidelines
In fact governments and world leaders across the world should have had a round table debate and discussion with the experienced health professionals to find the best possible way of treatment , guidelines and SOP,s for the public health issues .
Vaccination .
Fauci and Bill Gate plans for vaccinating 7.6 Billion people across the world is ludicrous and immoral . It’s nothing more than generating money by the biggest pharmaceutical joints for making profits .
People who are opposing vaccine have some logic and they are not NUTS . Previous experience reveals untoward side effects of vaccination resulting in deaths , paralysis , infertility , autism , dementia , Alzheimer’s disease , MS , Parkinson’s disease etc .
The number of children suffering from Autism abd ADHD has increased from
In 1974 one in 5000
In 1990 one in 500
In 2000 one in 166
In 2011 one in 80
In 2013 one in 70
In 2018 one in 68
In 2019 one in 55
In 2020, the CDC reported that approximately 1 in 50 children in the U.S. is diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Boys are four times more likely to be diagnosed with autism than girls.
The incidence has gone sharply higher since the last decade of vaccine ( from 2011-2020) .
This means that over 695,000 people in the UK only may be autistic, an estimate derived from the 1.1% prevalence rate applied to the 2011 UK census figures.
Therefore , pharmaceutical companies who are promoting vaccinating the entire world population should clarify the contents and the gradients used in vaccines which is a serious cause for concerns.
Moreover
How dare are they trying to convince the world population with the orchestrated campaign in promoting vaccine as a treatment in the given health issues ?
They are advising that lockdown, face masking and social distancing are mandatory till vaccine comes in the market and is injected into all the people in the world as a cure ?
People of the world know very well that Vaccine is not a treatment but has been used as a prophylaxis for some common diseases in the past . If there has not been any vaccine for Spanish Flue virus in 1918
SARS1 in 2003
HIV in 1984
HINI in 2009
MERS in 2013
There won’t be any vaccine for the SARS2 as virus has mutated significantly with different strains in different parts of the world therefore there won’t be any particular vaccine useful for everywhere . It may be rather proved to be harmful as per figures above .
Face masking .
There is evidence that face masks are not good for everyone . Face masks are more harmful than benefits to health , as face mask block oxygen and generate Co2 which we rebreathing causes hypoxia , hyperaemia , confusion , headaches and delirium due to rebreathing and accumulation of Co2 .
Face masks also produce cortisone and reduces body’s immunity .
Face masks are only helpful while someone is coughing or have severe chest infection to protect others . They are also useful during surgical or medical procedures by the health professionals to protect patients .
Social distancing.
Is social segregation and loss of intimate contact but also reduces our immunity .
Ventilators & ECMO ( extra corporeal membranous oxygenation machines ) .
Also controversial in treating patients . They are doing more harm than benefits as multiple studies have proved.
Only 4-5 % patients with the COVID -19 require ITU admission and ventilations . Trend is towards non invasive positive pressure ventilation rather than invasive procedures.
Our Moral Duty .
I believe on equality , justice , mutual respect , equal opportunity regardless of colour , race , religion , language , individuality. Nobody should be discriminated on the basis of rich or poor with abundant or limited resources.
Many people are underprivileged and in disadvantaged but we need to support them in their difficult time.
Ethnic minority / ethnic majority . I would not have been here had I considered that.
We should be standing on the basis of the humanity without any monetary or political gain.
We are here neither to play down the virus nor any political gain but we are here to look into the far reaching effects of the virus and lockdown causing serious atrocities across the world .
We need to reassure public in UK and across the world to reassure , support their health , employments to reduce poverty , recommence business and trade to boast the crippling economy and students to get back to their school to resume their education .
We all are born equal from Adam , all are brothers and sisters . We have to protect everyone.
Online education, online shopping , online medical treatment, online business , online congresses and online meetings , on line college and universities? If that’s the future then how are we going to develop strong leadership ? How our new generation would gain confidence to stand against the growing challenges of the world ? .
I believe on equality , unity , love , mutual respect , peace and tranquility without discrimination of borders , areas , colour , groups , cast , money, race , religion , individuality and boundaries as every life matters .
Conclusion:
Mishandling of the recent COVID -19 pandemics in the world resulted in serious health ,economical crisis , social and mental issues due to the lockdown .
A critical approach for future learning is necessary to learn a good lesson .
Our country is teetering on a precipice. Are we sheep to be ruled by fear ? The lockdown should be released in stages in a sensible way to let the crippling economy boast up .The business and employment to be encouraged . Waiting lists in hospitals be looked into to investigate and treat patients to clear the backlog . Children and students should go back to school , colleges and universities to resume their education.
It’s the duty of the world leaders , governments, politicians and the health professionals to get public out of overwhelming fear , anxiety and depression in the given circumstances.
I appreciate brave men and women abd the health professionals standing up for their freedom , liberty and fundamental across the world . If we are worried about the mortality rate from a virus, just think about this and compare with the above figures which reflects the mortality rate every year .
Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil
MB BS . FRCSEd. FRCSI
General , Colorectal , Breast & Laparoscopic Surgeon
United Kingdom
Chairman
Global Nishtarian Medical Organisation ( GNO)
All Pakistan Medical Association UK ( APMA)
World Doctors Alliance ( WDA)
International award winning speakers
Teacher & trainer
03/08/2020
Web. Globalnishtarian. Org
00447872969928
References
1)Medically reviewed by Vincent J. Tavella, MPH by Hannah Nichols on July 4, 2019
2)A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data. By John P.A. Ioannidis March 17, 2020 once-in-a-century evidence fiasco.
3)Up to 300 Million People May Be Infected by Covid-19, Stanford Guru John Ioannidis Says. By Patricia Claus – Jun 27, 2020
Dr. Ioannidis: 0.05% to 1% is a reasonable range for what the data tell us now for the infection fatality rate, with a median of about 0.25%. The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure, who are the people infected, and how they are managed. For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%. For 45 to 70, it is probably about 0.05-0.3%. For those above 70, it escalates substantially, to 1% or higher for those over 85. For frail, debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes, it can go up to 25% during major outbreaks in these facilities.
Dr. Ioannidis: I feel extremely sad that my predictions were verified. “Major consequences on the economy, society and mental health” have already occurred. I hope they are reversible, and this depends to a large extent on whether we can avoid prolonging the draconian lockdowns and manage to deal with COVID-19 in a smart, precision-risk targeted approach, rather than blindly shutting down everything. Similarly, we have already started to see the consequences of “financial crisis, unrest, and civil strife.” I hope it is not followed by “war and meltdown of the social fabric.”
Globally, the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion, and they are putting at risk millions of lives, with the potential resurgence of tuberculosis, childhood diseases like measles where vaccination programs are disrupted, and malaria. I hope that policymakers look at the big picture of all the potential problems and not only on the very important, but relatively thin slice of evidence that is COVID-19.
4)Stanford’s John P.A. Ioannidis — co-director of the university’s Meta-Research Innovation Center and professor of medicine
response to the coronavirus pandemic may be “a fiasco in the making” because we are making seismic decisions based on “utterly unreliable” data. The data we do have, Ioannidis explains, indicates that we are likely severely overreacting.
“The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic. But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco,”
5)Ioannidis, John. “The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data.” medRxiv (2020).


thewashingtonstandard--2020-08-04--Houston Mayor Orders Cops To Punish Those Who Won’t Wear A Face Mask

Editor ’ s Note : The Houston mayor is giving unlawful orders .
In fact , he is actually violating that law and demanding police officers violate it with him against innocent citizens that he is supposed to serve .
• Standing Against Unlawful Mask Mandates In Businesses – What The Law Says • The Mask Of The Beast • Georgia : Man Tests Mask Policies At Kroger – Informs About The Law – This Is What We Need More Of Today !
( Video ) • Americans Act Like Sheep While Germans Protest Masks & Lockdowns As Additional Information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mayor of Houston is demanding that the police use unjust force and extortion to punish those in the city who refuse to comply with the commands to wear a face mask .
Fines will be $ 250 for those who will not comply with a warning .
“ For months , we have been focusing on education and not citations , but now I am instructing the Houston Police Department to issue the necessary warnings and citations to anyone not wearing a mask in public if they do not meet the criteria for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Turner said Monday at a press briefing .
Safety is every tyrant ’ s battle cry .
Stay strong , folks , especially if you won ’ t wear their occultic muzzle .
Luckily , the majority of the public can see through this now .
Finally , it seems like at least some people are standing up .
The real way to keep this from happening is for cops to wake up to what they are doing to the public all on orders from tyrants and for the public to simply refuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they get one .
Turner , who has been Houston ’ s mayor since 2015 , announced the crackdown on those refusing to wear a mask after the city reported its fifth straight day with more than 1,000 new coronavirus cases .
According to a report by RT , police won ’ t respond to calls from residents reporting people violating the mask mandate , Turner said .
Instead , they will issue citations when they encounter people on their regular patrols who aren ’ t wearing a mask in public and refuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Turner also demanded that people not be mad at his hired enforcers who are blindly following these orders to subjugate their fellow human beings .
“ Please don ’ t get mad at police officers , ” Turner said .
“ It ’ s all about public health and driving our numbers down.
” The mayor said it ’ s particularly important to reduce the spread of Covid-19 heading into schools reopening next month and the approaching flu season .
Obviously , that ’ s NOT what this is about .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public in line .
We know this because they continue to move the goalposts .
They Moved The Goalposts…AGAIN !
: “ It ’ s Not Over When The Vaccine Arrives ”

Editor’s Note: The Houston mayor is giving unlawful orders. In fact, he is actually violating that law and demanding police officers violate it with him against innocent citizens that he is supposed to serve.
The mayor of Houston is demanding that the police use unjust force and extortion to punish those in the city who refuse to comply with the commands to wear a face mask. Fines will be $250 for those who will not comply with a warning.
“For months, we have been focusing on education and not citations, but now I am instructing the Houston Police Department to issue the necessary warnings and citations to anyone not wearing a mask in public if they do not meet the criteria for an exemption,” Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner said Monday at a press briefing.
The citation comes with a $250 fine. Lives are at stake, so I am taking this step to save lives and slow the virus from spreading in the month of August. — Houston Mayor's Office (@houmayor) August 3, 2020
Safety is every tyrant’s battle cry. Stay strong, folks, especially if you won’t wear their occultic muzzle. Luckily, the majority of the public can see through this now.
Hitler, Pol Pot,and Mao would be proud of you. But you will fail. You will stoke civil unrest — #freeAssange (@bitcoincyclist) August 4, 2020
Finally, it seems like at least some people are standing up. The real way to keep this from happening is for cops to wake up to what they are doing to the public all on orders from tyrants and for the public to simply refuse to comply and pay the fine if they get one.
Turner, who has been Houston’s mayor since 2015, announced the crackdown on those refusing to wear a mask after the city reported its fifth straight day with more than 1,000 new coronavirus cases. According to a report by RT, police won’t respond to calls from residents reporting people violating the mask mandate, Turner said. Instead, they will issue citations when they encounter people on their regular patrols who aren’t wearing a mask in public and refuse to do so when given a warning.
Turner also demanded that people not be mad at his hired enforcers who are blindly following these orders to subjugate their fellow human beings. “Please don’t get mad at police officers,” Turner said. “It’s all about public health and driving our numbers down.”
The mayor said it’s particularly important to reduce the spread of Covid-19 heading into schools reopening next month and the approaching flu season. Obviously, that’s NOT what this is about. It’s about control and keeping the public in line. We know this because they continue to move the goalposts.
They Moved The Goalposts…AGAIN!: “It’s Not Over When The Vaccine Arrives”
Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo


thewashingtonstandard--2020-08-04--Progress Tyranny:  The Moving Forward Act

Anti Fed Ed Warriors , I hope the first segment of this series got your attention .
HR 2 , the Moving Forward Act is quite frankly , one giant step into a scary new America .
While the Bill is to transform our highways and how we get around , HR 2 also attacks education in an open face slap .
Millions of us are to be skilled or re-skilled to fit into the ‘ new ’ American system .
That system places economics over people and nature over humans , as the most important .
If the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the social justice patrols woven into HR 2 , will .
All that in mind , it ’ s one twisted system !
Warriors , if we don ’ t do anything else in 2020 , we MUST demand HR 2 to be gutted or killed .
However , what we need to understand is , that Congress was crafty with HR 2 .
You ’ ll see , if you read the over 2,700 pages , notice that several smaller bills were thrown in to create one mega-monster !
Where the ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Congress also has several of those smaller Bills as independent , stand on their own Bills .
Some of these types of Bills are twins ( meaning one version in the House/one in the Senate ) .
So , the point is : if the mega-monster ( HR 2 ) doesn ’ t live , maybe some of the smaller versions will .
Academics ?
Who Needs Them , Anyway ?
!
Below , is an image showing the first few Sections of HR 2 where education is embedded with labor .
Of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ healthcare .
Warriors , from Section 1609 , a new federal task force under the Sec .
of Transportation will work with LEAs ( Local Education Agencies , Higher Education Institutions , Community Colleges , Skill Based Schools and Statewide Workforce Development Boards to create EXCLUSIVE Career Pathways in pre-apprenticeships and nationally registered apprenticeships and other work-based learning opportunities for youth .
The goal is to attract all school choices and genders .
As we know , CPs ( Career Pathways ) are aligned to both CCSS and STEM ( Common Core State @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and , Math ) .
Section 2503 will awards federal funds ( our tax dollars ) for demonstration grants to ANY LEA , HEI , or Workforce Development Board in the name of access to jobs for reduced fares on all transportation routes/vehicles .
This targets the low-income sector of America .
Likewise , Section 2601 created a national transportation workforce center .
Grants will be awarded to ANY non-profit group which develops CP programs .
You ’ ll find that all connected to this will land at the feet of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , look below to see more HR 2 Education overreaches : The entire section on Digital Equity is worth reading , Warriors .
It ’ s deeply rooted in Big Data/Big Tech and it means absolutely NOTHING good for us , as free people .
You ’ ll find that Section begins on page 1331 .
Look for the Capacity Grants .
On page 1356 , look at the workforce/education ‘ outcomes ’ .
( remember , ‘ outcomes ’ is the government ’ s mold for you , not your personal choice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the cost ( page 965 ) of $ 50 million .
Attached to this : are third party data collectors .
( *Note : as we know , the Big Data goes much deeper than 3rd parties . )
As education watchdogs like Charlotte Iserbyt and Anita Hoge have shown us , the “ Common Education Data Standards ” are , once again , surfacing in HR 2 .
See pages 2089 and 2092 .
On page 2453 , be sure to see how the CTE ( Career Tech Education ) data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2454 shows the trail doesn ’ t end after you get a job .
Connected to this , on page 1508 , you ’ ll see ESEA/ESSA ( Elementary and Secondary Education Act/Every Student Succeeds Act ) brings in co-ops snd , P3s ( public private partnerships ) into schools .
Page 1753 shows you the collaborative education outreaches .
These ‘ efforts ’ are a guise for data tracking and alignment in jobs .
Warriors , much of the ‘ education ’ aspect of HR 2 centers on updating everything possible to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the United Nations .
However , remember the USMCA ( US-Mexico-Canada Agreement ) ?
Remember how that Agreement , accompanied by Congressional Bills to change America to adhere to the constructs of it ?
Education was 100 % attached to labor/jobs/workforce in the USMCA .
While all the mainstream media showed us was how great this was to be for our economy , I was showing you the underbelly of it by how much of our constitutional sovereignty was thrown out the window with the Agreement/Bills ( one of which is now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100 % of the parameters for the USMCA .
Other places you ’ ll find ‘ sustainability ’ in HR 2 ( aligns to both the SDGs and USMCA ) : Section 10203 ( aviation fuel ) , in that section , page 1189 shows you fossil based aviation fuel must be replaced with synthetic hydrocarbons .
Page 1249 , All fisheries and biodiversity locations must be sustainable .
Page 1523 , Next Generation 911 ( a massive data tracking system tied to geo-tracing ) must be sustainable .
Page 1617 , What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ energy .
Page 1652 , All Smart Cities/Communities must be sustainable .
Page 1653 defines just how .
Page 1702 , All energy finances must be sustainable .
Page 1789 , All federal public buildings and spaces must be ‘ green ’ in sustainability .
So how does ALL this attach to education ?
Simple : it ’ ll be what ’ s taught in schools , out of schools , in our communities , and everywhere ANYTHING can be remotely associated with it .
Warriors , School Bonds also made it into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the government will yet again , expand the control attached to bonds .
If we don ’ t pay back federal bonds in money , it ’ ll be in servitude .
Page 2501 reveals that $ 10 billion dollars will be deemed ‘ school bonds ’ .
At least 10 percent of that money MUST be used to bring in and support digital distance learning .
Connected to this , on page 2507 , is that the LEAs must provide ANY information deemed necessary .
More than likely , the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those agencies receiving the data .
What ’ s interesting about the Bonds is that the government is picking and choosing which schools can get these bonds .
Look on page 2542 for the expenses and credits tied to these bonds .
You should see that some schools are not eligible .
You can find ALL the credits and bonds tied to education in HR 2 , beginning with Section 90111 and 90201 .
Section 90451 details the environmental justice credits ( section continues to 90621 ) .
Warriors , if you can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you , I am saddened .
It ’ s never been more visible , what our federal goverment has before us .
In my next segment , a look at healthcare and other education-related activities will be in HR 2 .
Will they interact with education ?
Absolutely .
From 2002 to today , Lynne has been a featured speaker at small meetings and large conferences .
Since 2009 , she has served as a frequent guest on nationwide radio and multimedia shows .
Lynne also co-established PIE NC ( Preserving Integrity and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a retired private ( homeschool ) teacher and regionally recognized support group leader .
She has also been a business owner , worked with children 's ministry and currently is an education liaison for Protecting Innocence Campaign ( based in OH ) , wife and mom .
Lynne is also an adviser to the national grassroots campaign `` Child Abuse in the Classroom '' , where it is the campaign 's belief that `` Repealing ESSA and Restoring FERPA '' are the best ways to help restore our nation 's education system .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Educator from the National Society of High School Scholars , as well as the 2016 L & B Network 's Torchbearer Award for educational advocacy .
She has been recognized by her peers as an expert in Common Core , Career Tech Education , Career Pathways , workforce and competency-based education reform , federal overreaches into education and our families .

Anti Fed Ed Warriors, I hope the first segment of this series got your attention. HR 2, the Moving Forward Act is quite frankly, one giant step into a scary new America. While the Bill is to transform our highways and how we get around, HR 2 also attacks education in an open face slap.
Millions of us are to be skilled or re-skilled to fit into the ‘new’ American system. That system places economics over people and nature over humans, as the most important. If the government’s not tracking us, then the social justice patrols woven into HR 2, will. All that in mind, it’s one twisted system!
Warriors, if we don’t do anything else in 2020, we MUST demand HR 2 to be gutted or killed. However, what we need to understand is, that Congress was crafty with HR 2.
You’ll see, if you read the over 2,700 pages, notice that several smaller bills were thrown in to create one mega-monster!
Where the ‘craftiness’ comes in, is that Congress also has several of those smaller Bills as independent, stand on their own Bills. Some of these types of Bills are twins (meaning one version in the House/one in the Senate).
So, the point is: if the mega-monster (HR 2) doesn’t live, maybe some of the smaller versions will.
Academics? Who Needs Them, Anyway?!
Below, is an image showing the first few Sections of HR 2 where education is embedded with labor. Of these sections, some will also intersect healthcare.
Warriors, from Section 1609, a new federal task force under the Sec. of Transportation will work with LEAs (Local Education Agencies, Higher Education Institutions, Community Colleges, Skill Based Schools and Statewide Workforce Development Boards to create EXCLUSIVE Career Pathways in pre-apprenticeships and nationally registered apprenticeships and other work-based learning opportunities for youth. The goal is to attract all school choices and genders. As we know, CPs (Career Pathways) are aligned to both CCSS and STEM (Common Core State Standards and Science, Technology, Engineering, and, Math).
Section 2503 will awards federal funds (our tax dollars) for demonstration grants to ANY LEA, HEI, or Workforce Development Board in the name of access to jobs for reduced fares on all transportation routes/vehicles. This targets the low-income sector of America. Likewise, Section 2601 created a national transportation workforce center. Grants will be awarded to ANY non-profit group which develops CP programs. You’ll find that all connected to this will land at the feet of the U.S. Dept. of Education.
Warriors, look below to see more HR 2 Education overreaches:
The entire section on Digital Equity is worth reading, Warriors. It’s deeply rooted in Big Data/Big Tech and it means absolutely NOTHING good for us, as free people. You’ll find that Section begins on page 1331. Look for the Capacity Grants. On page 1356, look at the workforce/education ‘outcomes’. (remember, ‘outcomes’ is the government’s mold for you, not your personal choice). Related to the Digital Equity is the cost (page 965) of $50 million. Attached to this: are third party data collectors. (*Note: as we know, the Big Data goes much deeper than 3rd parties.)
As education watchdogs like Charlotte Iserbyt and Anita Hoge have shown us, the “Common Education Data Standards” are, once again, surfacing in HR 2.
See pages 2089 and 2092. On page 2453, be sure to see how the CTE (Career Tech Education) data collection and tracking will go. Page 2454 shows the trail doesn’t end after you get a job.
Connected to this, on page 1508, you’ll see ESEA/ESSA (Elementary and Secondary Education Act/Every Student Succeeds Act) brings in co-ops snd, P3s (public private partnerships) into schools. Page 1753 shows you the collaborative education outreaches. These ‘efforts’ are a guise for data tracking and alignment in jobs.
Warriors, much of the ‘education’ aspect of HR 2 centers on updating everything possible to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations.
However, remember the USMCA (US-Mexico-Canada Agreement)? Remember how that Agreement, accompanied by Congressional Bills to change America to adhere to the constructs of it? Education was 100% attached to labor/jobs/workforce in the USMCA.
While all the mainstream media showed us was how great this was to be for our economy, I was showing you the underbelly of it by how much of our constitutional sovereignty was thrown out the window with the Agreement/Bills (one of which is now law). HR 2 accomplishes almost 100% of the parameters for the USMCA.
Other places you’ll find ‘sustainability’ in HR 2 (aligns to both the SDGs and USMCA):
Section 10203 (aviation fuel), in that section, page 1189 shows you fossil based aviation fuel must be replaced with synthetic hydrocarbons.
Page 1249, All fisheries and biodiversity locations must be sustainable.
Page 1523, Next Generation 911 (a massive data tracking system tied to geo-tracing) must be sustainable.
Page 1617, What needs to be converted to sustainable expanded energy.
Page 1652, All Smart Cities/Communities must be sustainable. Page 1653 defines just how.
Page 1702, All energy finances must be sustainable.
Page 1789, All federal public buildings and spaces must be ‘green’ in sustainability.
So how does ALL this attach to education? Simple: it’ll be what’s taught in schools, out of schools, in our communities, and everywhere ANYTHING can be remotely associated with it.
Warriors, School Bonds also made it into HR 2, Moving Forward. So, the government will yet again, expand the control attached to bonds. If we don’t pay back federal bonds in money, it’ll be in servitude.
Page 2501 reveals that $10 billion dollars will be deemed ‘school bonds’. At least 10 percent of that money MUST be used to bring in and support digital distance learning. Connected to this, on page 2507, is that the LEAs must provide ANY information deemed necessary. More than likely, the U.S. Dept. of Education will be among those agencies receiving the data. What’s interesting about the Bonds is that the government is picking and choosing which schools can get these bonds. Look on page 2542 for the expenses and credits tied to these bonds. You should see that some schools are not eligible. You can find ALL the credits and bonds tied to education in HR 2, beginning with Section 90111 and 90201. Section 90451 details the environmental justice credits (section continues to 90621).
Closing:
Warriors, if you cannot see the pattern being set before you, I am saddened. It’s never been more visible, what our federal goverment has before us. In my next segment, a look at healthcare and other education-related activities will be in HR 2. Will they interact with education? Absolutely.