thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-01--Report: Second Hunter Biden Laptop Seized by DEA

One could only be so reckless , wild , and lawless if they had no fear of getting caught or held to account .
And as we see with the corrupt media , Biden was right .
A second laptop belonging to Hunter Biden , son of former Vice President Joe Biden , was reportedly seized in February during a raid on a psychiatrist by the Drug Enforcement Administration ( DEA ) .
Hunter Biden was reportedly not the target of the raid .
NBC News first reported the best Friday afternoon at the end of an article in which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thereof — about the emails on an abandoned laptop , which purportedly connect Joe Biden to his son ’ s businesses .
The first laptop was seized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in December 2019 .
NBC reported on the second : If [ Hunter Biden ] did leave the machine in Delaware , it would have marked at least the second time he has left behind a laptop .
According to two people familiar with the matter , a different Hunter Biden laptop landed in the custody of the DEA in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the Massachusetts office of a psychiatrist accused of professional misconduct .
The psychiatrist has not been charged with a crime .
Hunter Biden was not a target of the search or the investigation , and his lawyer ultimately got his laptop back .
It ’ s not clear why his computer was left in the doctor ’ s office .
Sources told NBC News that the device belonging to the 50-year-old son of former Vice President Joe Biden , who is now a presidential candidate , was taken into custody by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warrant in the Massachusetts office of a psychiatrist who was accused of professional misconduct .
That former celebrity psychiatrist , Keith Ablow , saw his license suspended after he faced allegations of sexually exploiting patients and illegally diverting prescription drugs .
Ablow has denied the allegations and has not been charged with any crime .
The report from NBC on Friday said Hunter Biden was not a target of the search or the investigation , and his lawyer got the laptop back .
It remains unclear why the device was there in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden did not immediately return a request for comment .
The Washington Examiner also reached out to the DEA for comment .
Hunter Biden has struggled with substance abuse .
He was discharged from the U.S. Navy in 2013 after testing positive for cocaine .
Data and files on the original laptop , left at a repair store in Wilmington , Delaware , purportedly connect Hunter Biden to it .

One could only be so reckless, wild, and lawless if they had no fear of getting caught or held to account. And as we see with the corrupt media, Biden was right.
Report: Second Hunter Biden Laptop Seized by DEA
By: Breitbart, October 31, 2020:
A second laptop belonging to Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President Joe Biden, was reportedly seized in February during a raid on a psychiatrist by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Hunter Biden was reportedly not the target of the raid.
NBC News first reported the best Friday afternoon at the end of an article in which it defended its reporting — or lack thereof — about the emails on an abandoned laptop, which purportedly connect Joe Biden to his son’s businesses.
The first laptop was seized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in December 2019.
NBC reported on the second:
If [Hunter Biden] did leave the machine in Delaware, it would have marked at least the second time he has left behind a laptop.
According to two people familiar with the matter, a different Hunter Biden laptop landed in the custody of the DEA in February when they executed a search warrant on the Massachusetts office of a psychiatrist accused of professional misconduct. The psychiatrist has not been charged with a crime.
Hunter Biden was not a target of the search or the investigation, and his lawyer ultimately got his laptop back. It’s not clear why his computer was left in the doctor’s office.
The Washington Examiner expanded on NBC’s reporting:
Sources told NBC News that the device belonging to the 50-year-old son of former Vice President Joe Biden, who is now a presidential candidate, was taken into custody by the DEA in February while executing a search warrant in the Massachusetts office of a psychiatrist who was accused of professional misconduct.
That former celebrity psychiatrist, Keith Ablow, saw his license suspended after he faced allegations of sexually exploiting patients and illegally diverting prescription drugs. Ablow has denied the allegations and has not been charged with any crime.
The report from NBC on Friday said Hunter Biden was not a target of the search or the investigation, and his lawyer got the laptop back. It remains unclear why the device was there in the first place.
A lawyer for Hunter Biden did not immediately return a request for comment. The Washington Examiner also reached out to the DEA for comment. Hunter Biden has struggled with substance abuse. He was discharged from the U.S. Navy in 2013 after testing positive for cocaine.
Data and files on the original laptop, left at a repair store in Wilmington, Delaware, purportedly connect Hunter Biden to it.
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-01--American Church: Taking Off The Robe Of Christ For Tyrants Lest We Offend The Weak?

American Church : Taking Off The Robe Of Christ For Tyrants Lest We Offend The Weak ?
Recently , while driving into Tennessee to minister , I was on the phone with a friend of mine who was sharing with me a bit of the message that he had received this last week from a local minister ( John 10:12 ) .
He said that he had shared with his congregation how he wears a mask lest he should offend the weak ones in the Church .
You heard me right .
He wears a mask concerning a virus that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an invisible enemy that he can not see that has been promulgated by the mainstream media and the government that he does not trust ( Isaiah 5:20 ) .
This leader , to what I know not , was clearly wresting and perverting scripture .
1 Corinthians 8:9 says “ But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to them that are weak.
” Notice the word “ liberty.
” Friends , I have to tell you that it never ceases to amaze me as to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ministers can be .
He is , in fact , teaching his congregation how to become messengers for the tyrants that he is commanded to throw-off rather than the Christ that he claims to serve .
What he is talking about when wearing a mask lest he should offend ?
Do I take on the ways of a tyrant to show men how they are to be made free in Christ ( Amos 3:3 ; John 8:32 ) ?
Do I act like the devil to lead the weak to Christ ( 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offend ?
Do I transgress God ’ s law by committing sin in order to show men how to live by grace ( Romans 6:1-2 ) , lest I should offend ?
Do I become a criminal before God so that I do not offend the weak ?
Blasphemy !
The only thing that is being offended in this sort of heretical talk is God Himself !
Jesus is the Way , the Truth and the Life ( John 14:6 ) .
He is not confusion , lies and death ( Romans 6:23 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by being just like the weak ?
That is like becoming the blind to lead the blind and we all know where that ends up , the ditch ( Matthew 15:14 ) Does one lead from the back ?
Do the uneducated biblical illiterates teach the rest of us because I might offend the weak ones ?
We need to take time to read our Bibles and know for ourselves as to what it declares ( 2 Timothy 2:15 ) .
Again , do I put on the chains of the tyrant to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those chains off ( John 8:32 ; 2 Corinthians 3:17 ) .
I have never seen anything so ridiculous in all of my life .
The Lord said that men are destroyed for the lack of knowledge and that is exactly what is happening today ( Hosea 4:6 ) .
It ’ s just another excuse for the Church to remain in disobedience to the Word of God in an attempt to further justify the unjustifiable ( Revelation 21:8 ) .
It ’ s a good thing Jesus Christ is the standard and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In conclusion : Is not the law of truth to be found in the mouth of the preacher ( Malachi 2:6 ) ?
Yes !
Does the Bible teach us , “ To the law and to the testimony : if they speak not according to this word , it is because there is no light in them ( Isaiah 8:20 ) ?
Yes , it does .
Does the Bible teach us to submit to those who violate God ’ s moral law ?
Absolutely not !
Nowhere in Scripture can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Does the Bible tell us that we are the salt of the earth ?
Yes , it does , and what if we lose that savor ?
We then become good for nothing , we are then cast out , and to be trodden under the foot of men .
Is that what is happening in so many different ways today ?
Yes , it is !
Were we warned time and time again by the Lord not to be deceived ?
( Matthew 24:5 ) Yes , we were .
Article posted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Article by Bradlee Dean

American Church: Taking Off The Robe Of Christ For Tyrants Lest We Offend The Weak?
“What is the problem here? Instead of these Church leaders adhering to Christ and His Word, they want to adhere to the tyrant lest they should offend the weak-You cannot make this up!”-Bradlee Dean
Recently, while driving into Tennessee to minister, I was on the phone with a friend of mine who was sharing with me a bit of the message that he had received this last week from a local minister (John 10:12).
He said that he had shared with his congregation how he wears a mask lest he should offend the weak ones in the Church. You heard me right.
He wears a mask concerning a virus that cannot be proven to ward off an invisible enemy that he cannot see that has been promulgated by the mainstream media and the government that he does not trust (Isaiah 5:20).
This leader, to what I know not, was clearly wresting and perverting scripture.
1 Corinthians 8:9 says “But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to them that are weak.” Notice the word “liberty.”
Friends, I have to tell you that it never ceases to amaze me as to how backwards and upside down these self-proclaimed ministers can be.
He is, in fact, teaching his congregation how to become messengers for the tyrants that he is commanded to throw-off rather than the Christ that he claims to serve.
What he is talking about when wearing a mask lest he should offend?
Do I take on the ways of a tyrant to show men how they are to be made free in Christ (Amos 3:3; John 8:32)?
Do I act like the devil to lead the weak to Christ (1 John 2:4), lest I should offend?
Do I transgress God’s law by committing sin in order to show men how to live by grace (Romans 6:1-2), lest I should offend?
Do I become a criminal before God so that I do not offend the weak? Blasphemy!
The only thing that is being offended in this sort of heretical talk is God Himself!
Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life (John 14:6). He is not confusion, lies and death (Romans 6:23)!
Do I lead the weak by being just like the weak? That is like becoming the blind to lead the blind and we all
know where that ends up, the ditch (Matthew 15:14)
Does one lead from the back? Do the uneducated biblical illiterates teach the rest of us because I might offend the weak ones?
We need to take time to read our Bibles and know for ourselves as to what it declares (2 Timothy 2:15).
Again, do I put on the chains of the tyrant to convert men to Christ? Christ broke those chains off (John 8:32; 2 Corinthians 3:17).
I have never seen anything so ridiculous in all of my life. The Lord said that men are destroyed for the lack of knowledge and that is exactly what is happening today (Hosea 4:6).
It’s just another excuse for the Church to remain in disobedience to the Word of God in an attempt to further justify the unjustifiable (Revelation 21:8).
It’s a good thing Jesus Christ is the standard and not fallen man and his heretical teachings.
In conclusion: Is not the law of truth to be found in the mouth of the preacher (Malachi 2:6)? Yes!
Does the Bible teach us, “To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them (Isaiah 8:20)?
Yes, it does.
Does the Bible teach us to submit to those who violate God’s moral law?
Absolutely not! Nowhere in Scripture can you find that to be true.
“Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.” -Mark 8:15
Does the Bible tell us that we are the salt of the earth? Yes, it does, and what if we lose that savor? We then become good for nothing, we are then cast out, and to be trodden under the foot of men.
Is that what is happening in so many different ways today? Yes, it is!
“Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.”
Were we warned time and time again by the Lord not to be deceived? (Matthew 24:5) Yes, we were.
“That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive.” -Ephesians 4:14
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media. Article by Bradlee Dean


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-01--Election Special: Pre-Planned 2020 Election Chaos and the “New 9/11”

In this 2020 election special , a collaboration between Unlimited Hangout and The Last American Vagabond , Ryan and Whitney @ @ @ @ @ from US intelligence officials that the US is “ at the doorstep of another 9/11 @ @ @ @ @ those same intelligence agencies are directly tied to tight-knit group of shady companies that have @ @ @ @ @ scenarios for the 2020 US election for over 2 years , including scenarios that mainstream @ @ @ @ @ inevitable with less than a week to go before the election .
Whitney Webb is @ @ @ @ @ in Chile .
She has contributed to several independent media outlets including Global Research , @ @ @ @ @ Institute and 21st Century Wire , among others .
She has made several radio and @ @ @ @ @ 2019 winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism .

In this 2020 election special, a collaboration between Unlimited Hangout and The Last American Vagabond, Ryan and Whitney discuss recent and unsettling warnings from US intelligence officials that the US is “at the doorstep of another 9/11”, while many of those same intelligence agencies are directly tied to tight-knit group of shady companies that have been simulating “doomsday” scenarios for the 2020 US election for over 2 years, including scenarios that mainstream media have recently portrayed as inevitable with less than a week to go before the election.
Video Source Links:
https://unlimitedhangout.com/
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/a-long-dark-winter-experts-worry-about-mental-health-in-first-full-covid-19-winter-1.5154468
https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/infrastructure-security/extremism-building-to-the-doorstep-of-another-9-11-dhs-official-tells-anti-semitism-hearing/
https://homeland.house.gov/activities/hearings/confronting-the-rise-in-anti-semitic-domestic-terrorism-part-ii
https://www.dhs.gov/fusion-centers
https://www.dhs.gov/fusion-centers-and-joint-terrorism-task-forces
https://6abc.com/911-outage-outages-nationwide-national-down/6633389/
https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/video/3965221-911-outage-affecting-parts-of-philly-resolved/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hackers-have-taken-down-dozens-911-centers-why-it-so-n862206
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2020/09/whos-behind-mondays-14-state-911-outage/
https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/29/21494652/911-outage-centurylink-lumen-intrado
https://carbyne911.com/there-are-many-variations-of-passages-of-lorem-ipsum-available-but-the-majority-have/
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/07/investigative-series/why-a-shadowy-tech-firm-with-ties-to-israeli-intelligence-is-running-doomsday-election-simulations/
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/07/investigative-series/how-an-israeli-spy-linked-tech-firm-gained-access-to-the-us-govts-most-classified-networks/
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/cybereason-announces-new-plans-to-accelerate-access-to-us-govt-networks-ahead-of-2020-election/
https://nationalsecurity.gmu.edu/about-us/experts/
https://nationalsecurity.gmu.edu/david-kris/
https://www.cybereason.com/blog/election-cybersecurity-cyberattack
https://www.cyberscoop.com/massachusetts-election-security-drill/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JnY5clpe2s&t=1853s
https://www.cybereason.com/company/leadership-and-advisory-board
https://carbyne911.com/our-team/
https://web.archive.org/web/20190918112018/https://carbyne911.com/our-team/
https://carbyne911.com/our-partners/
https://carbyne911.com/
https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/denizcam/2020/03/17/to-fight-coronavirus-new-orleans-is-using-a-911-app-backed-by-peter-thiels-founders-fund/#55d03aabb065
https://carbyne911.com/covid-19-2/
https://carbyne911.com/es/remote-government-sp/
Article posted with permission from Whitney Webb


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-01--Mexican Journalist Exposes Joe Biden For Signing Compact That Created Influx Of Child Trafficking, I

Mexican Journalist Exposes Joe Biden For Signing Compact That Created Influx Of Child Trafficking, Immigrant Children In Cages

Remember those border cages with children that were photographed under the Obama administration ?
Well , they came as a result of an United Nations global compact signed by the usurper , Obama , and Biden .
The signing of that compact seemed to have led to a “ massive influx ” of child trafficking .
• Media Manipulation : Story About Detained Migrant Children Scrubbed After United Nations Said It Happened Under Obama • Who ’ s Really Exploiting Kids At The Border ?
• 13 Facts the Media ‘ Pros ’ Don ’ t Want You to Know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Illegal Aliens Fatally Separate Parents From ChildrenEthan Huff has the story .
Immediately following the final presidential debate between President Donald Trump and Joe Biden , Mexican journalist Oscar “ El Blue ” Ramirez , based out of Tijuana , created a live event to dispel the deadly lies spewed by Biden concerning children in “ cages ” at America ’ s southern border .
Joining the chorus of the rest of the liberal left , Biden not surprisingly tried to blame Trump for immigrant children being “ separated from their parents ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administration of creating the “ border cages ” where parentless children are supposedly being housed .
What Biden failed to mention , however , is that it was he and Barack Obama who signed the U.N .
Global Compact that created those border cages in the first place , not to mention the tens of thousands of immigrant children that have been trafficked through America ’ s southern border ever since the Obama administration made it all possible .
According to El Blue , Obama and Biden ’ s signing of this compact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ child trafficking , resulting in more than 20,000 children being locked in cages during Obama ’ s occupation of the White House .
El Blue also told viewers that he has witnessed first-hand how the “ coyote ” networks of child smugglers are taking full advantage of Obama and Biden ’ s open borders policies , which created a “ massive black market industry ” for trafficked children .
“ The fake families that resulted from the compact are a result of the poorly designed text with loopholes wide enough to build concentration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ El Blue says 72,000 trafficked kids have been rescued during the Donald Trump administration because of efforts to determine if the child was actually a biological offspring of the so-called ‘ parent ’ who paid coyotes for the use of the child.
” Far-left Antifa also involved in child trafficking syndicate created by Obama , Biden Contrary to the stupidity demonstrated by Twitter ’ s infamous “ blue checkmarks ” following Trump ’ s debate comments about coyotes – no , Trump was not talking about actual coyote animals – coyote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Trump administration has done much over the past four years to put an end to their disgusting crime syndicate , the left is desperately trying to maintain a hold on the open borders policies created by Obama and Biden because there is big money in child trafficking .
“ Trump ’ s effective shutdown of the global human trafficking has crushed the ‘ cash cow ’ of international trafficking , ” Sooner Politics reveals .
As it turns out , very few of the “ parents ” that accompany immigrant children – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keeps complaining are being “ separated ” from their parents – even know who their parents are because most of them are trafficked over and over again by fake “ parent ” coyotes .
With the help of Antifa , believe it or not , these coyotes pretend to be the children ’ s parents , using them repeatedly as anchors to maintain a foothold in America .
In the process , these innocent little ones end up being raped and tortured , all thanks to the open borders policies of Obama and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same kids over [ and ] over again , as an anchor to keep an illegal alien in the USA long enough to disappear in the interior of the U.S. , ” Sooner Politics explains .
“ That ’ s when the child is collected by the coyotes and looped back to the border regions of Mexico , to be recycled into another fake family and sent again , through the U.S. / Mexican border.
” Since these children are basically purchased , or rented , property – meaning they are child slaves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are forced to live in perpetual fear because of the ominous presence of global human trafficking syndicates , many of which are the product of leftist policies .
And if you recall , all of this has been attributed to the Trump administration .
The Trump administration has actually gone in the opposite direction on this issue .

Remember those border cages with children that were photographed under the Obama administration? Well, they came as a result of an United Nations global compact signed by the usurper, Obama, and Biden. The signing of that compact seemed to have led to a “massive influx” of child trafficking.
Immediately following the final presidential debate between President Donald Trump and Joe Biden, Mexican journalist Oscar “El Blue” Ramirez, based out of Tijuana, created a live event to dispel the deadly lies spewed by Biden concerning children in “cages” at America’s southern border.
Joining the chorus of the rest of the liberal left, Biden not surprisingly tried to blame Trump for immigrant children being “separated from their parents” at the border, accusing the current administration of creating the “border cages” where parentless children are supposedly being housed.
What Biden failed to mention, however, is that it was he and Barack Obama who signed the U.N. Global Compact that created those border cages in the first place, not to mention the tens of thousands of immigrant children that have been trafficked through America’s southern border ever since the Obama administration made it all possible.
According to El Blue, Obama and Biden’s signing of this compact created a “massive influx” of child trafficking, resulting in more than 20,000 children being locked in cages during Obama’s occupation of the White House.
El Blue also told viewers that he has witnessed first-hand how the “coyote” networks of child smugglers are taking full advantage of Obama and Biden’s open borders policies, which created a “massive black market industry” for trafficked children.
“The fake families that resulted from the compact are a result of the poorly designed text with loopholes wide enough to build concentration camps within,” reports Sooner Politics.
“El Blue says 72,000 trafficked kids have been rescued during the Donald Trump administration because of efforts to determine if the child was actually a biological offspring of the so-called ‘parent’ who paid coyotes for the use of the child.”
Far-left Antifa also involved in child trafficking syndicate created by Obama, Biden
Contrary to the stupidity demonstrated by Twitter’s infamous “blue checkmarks” following Trump’s debate comments about coyotes – no, Trump was not talking about actual coyote animals – coyote child traffickers are very real.
While the Trump administration has done much over the past four years to put an end to their disgusting crime syndicate, the left is desperately trying to maintain a hold on the open borders policies created by Obama and Biden because there is big money in child trafficking.
“Trump’s effective shutdown of the global human trafficking has crushed the ‘cash cow’ of international trafficking,” Sooner Politics reveals.
As it turns out, very few of the “parents” that accompany immigrant children – you know, the ones the left keeps complaining are being “separated” from their parents – even know who their parents are because most of them are trafficked over and over again by fake “parent” coyotes.
With the help of Antifa, believe it or not, these coyotes pretend to be the children’s parents, using them repeatedly as anchors to maintain a foothold in America. In the process, these innocent little ones end up being raped and tortured, all thanks to the open borders policies of Obama and Biden.
“Coyotes have used those same kids over [and] over again, as an anchor to keep an illegal alien in the USA long enough to disappear in the interior of the U.S.,” Sooner Politics explains.
“That’s when the child is collected by the coyotes and looped back to the border regions of Mexico, to be recycled into another fake family and sent again, through the U.S. / Mexican border.”
Since these children are basically purchased, or rented, property – meaning they are child slaves, thanks to Obama and Biden – they are forced to live in perpetual fear because of the ominous presence of global human trafficking syndicates, many of which are the product of leftist policies.
And if you recall, all of this has been attributed to the Trump administration. The Trump administration has actually gone in the opposite direction on this issue.


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-01--Health Ranger Designates All Employees Of Big Tech As “Enemies Of America” – Calls For Arrest & Char

Health Ranger Designates All Employees Of Big Tech As “Enemies Of America” – Calls For Arrest & Charges Of Treason, Racketeering & Election Interference

The Health Ranger Mike Adams and owner of NaturalNews.com penned a scathing piece and called out not just the CEOs of Big Tech corporations , but also their employees as “ enemies to America , ” noting that now that the federal government was being censored , they are just now taking notice .
Adams called “ on federal law enforcement to arrest , charge and prosecute the CEOs , managers and employees of these companies for treason , racketeering and a conspiracy to defraud the United States of America.
” DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf has now called out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social media platform “ endangers national security ” with its outrageous , never-ending censorship spree .
In a scathing letter , Wolf demanded Twitter , “ commit to never again censoring content ” on its platform , following Twitter ’ s malicious censorship of Customs and Border Protection ( CBP ) Commissioner Mark Morgan .
Now that Twitter is censoring government , it seems that Big Government is beginning to finally notice how dangerous Big Tech has become .
As I have relentlessly warned for the last four years , Big Tech already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government , and its CEOs like Dorsey believe they are above the law while suffering from the delusion that they alone possess a sort of twisted “ divine right ” to determine what people are allowed to speak , share , say or hear .
Over the last four years , I have repeatedly called for Jack Dorsey to be arrested and tried for treason , election interference , racketeering and fraud .
Now , suddenly , the head of the Dept .
of Homeland Security is echoing my own warnings , explaining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ national security threat .
But isn ’ t it interesting that until Big Tech ’ s censorship authoritarianism reached the level of censoring government itself , nobody in government seemed to mind Twitter ’ s censorship of private sector businesses and citizens ?
Now , it ’ s suddenly a “ national security ” issue .
In his letter , Wolf wrote : As the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies continue to rely on Twitter to share important information with the U.S. public , your censorship poses a threat to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ head of CBP for posting an update about the progress of building the border wall .
In response , Twitter ’ s radical left-wing moderators / censors wrote : You may not promote violence against , threaten , or harass other people on the basis of race , ethnicity , national origin , sexual orientation , gender , gender identity , religious affiliation , age , disability , or serious disease .
This is the same deception that Twitter and other tech giants use against anyone working to protect children from transgenderism indoctrination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of toxic vaccines , or defend the rights of Christians , conservatives or police officers .
To the deranged , lunatic Left , any defense of police , White people , Christianity or America is “ hate speech.
” In Wolf ’ s letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey , he explained , “ The acting commissioner ’ s tweet did none of these things… CBP guards the front line of the American homeland .
CBP repels and arrests thousands of violent criminal gang members each year .
CBP rescues young girls who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CBP intercepts dangerous drugs and contraband , including enough of the opioid fentanyl to kill every man , woman , and child in the United States several times over.
” But Twitter doesn ’ t care .
Any talk of building a border wall is “ hate speech ” and must be silenced .
As The Epoch Times writes : Wolf ’ s letter to Dorsey came the same day Twitter decided to unfreeze the account of the New York Post .
The outlet was unable to post content on its Twitter account @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stories about alleged overseas business dealings of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden ’ s son Hunter Biden .
Twitter stipulated that the outlet had to delete the original Biden Twitter posts before being able to tweet again , before changing its stance on Friday .
All employees of Big Tech are hereby designated enemies of America What this episode reveals in great details is the inescapable truth that ’ s now apparent to everyone : It ’ s not just the CEOs of these tech giants that are evil , criminal fraudsters and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their employees , too !
Because of their dedication to authoritarianism and the destruction of free speech , every employee of Google , YouTube , Twitter , Facebook and the fake news media cartels ( CNN , MSNBC , NY Times , WashPost , etc . )
is an enemy of America .
They despise this nation and actively work to destroy America ’ s border security , Constitution , Bill of Rights and rule of law .
It ’ s not just the criminal leaders of these organizations like Dorsey and Zuckerberg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s their digital jackbooted thugs who sit in their cubicles and silence all the speech they don ’ t want Americans to be able to read or share .
That speech includes information about America ’ s national security , obviously , as well as anything posted in support of law enforcement such as “ thin blue line ” flags , which Twitter and Facebook consider to be hate speech against BLM .
With Big Tech ’ s censorship , human civilization is now facing a war that ’ s just as dangerous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history , including World War II and the battle against Hitler ’ s Third Reich .
We do not espouse violence against anyone working for these companies , but rather call on federal law enforcement to arrest , charge and prosecute the CEOs , managers and employees of these companies for treason , racketeering and a conspiracy to defraud the United States of America .
( See below . )
Malicious censorship is no accident ; it is deliberate and targeted to silence Americans while promoting the interests of communist China Twitter and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ censorship is an “ accident , ” but that ’ s just a dishonest cover story .
It ’ s clear their censorship is deliberate and that the very philosophy of authoritarianism and censorship is now systemic in the company cultures of the tech giants .
You could call it , “ systemic intolerance ” or just plain “ digital bigotry , ” but the employees and contractors who work for these tech companies are , themselves , the very kind of racist , intolerant bullies they accuse Trump supporters of being .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ projection .
Thus , when Trump wins the election and it comes time to clean house and arrest the CEOs of the tech companies and charge them with treason , racketeering and fraud , we must remember that the employees and managers of these tech companies are complicit in crimes against the American people .
They must not be let off the hook without facing arrest and prosecution for their complicity .
Remember : As we learned from the East German soldiers manning the Berlin Wall , someone claiming , “ I was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The damage inflicted upon human freedom by Big Tech ’ s censorship is incalculable Big Tech ’ s employees conspired to destroy the lives of millions of Americans who have been irreparably harmed — financially and emotionally — by the extreme and deliberate censorship policies of companies like Twitter .
These employees are just as guilty as Dorsey himself , and they must face prosecution for their conspiracy of crimes against America .
Remember this as the civil war erupts due to insane , violent Leftists who are trying to carry out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Many of the Left ’ s footsoldiers who are throwing Molotov cocktails and committing arson on the streets are also employees of Big Tech .
During the day , they destroy this nation on the digital battlefield ; at night they burn America ’ s cities and small businesses to the ground , further shoring up the power of the corporate monopolists .
These people are , in essence , enemy combatants on a battlefield they declared .
They are enemies of America and they must be brought down through the application of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ America have already proven they are willing to abuse and exploit their power to destroy you , and their larger goal is the complete destruction of our republic .
If they are not stopped by force under law , they will continue their path of total destruction until nothing remains .
Stop them now or lose America forever .
And once Dorsey , Zuckerberg , Pichai and others are convicted in a court of law , America must choose a punishment for them that is consistent with the degree of human suffering they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A death sentence would be far too kind .
These tech CEOs must be made to endure their lawfully-decided punishments , for decades to come .
In doing so , we will be sending a message to all future would-be tyrants that America takes its freedoms seriously , and that those who conspire to destroy this nation ’ s First Amendment or Second Amendment will be dealt with in exactly the way they deserve .
Once the Big Tech criminals are brought to justice , the U.S. government must seize all the assets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their operations , and redistribute all assets to those who were harmed by Big Tech ’ s malicious censorship .
We need a nationwide class action settlement to right the wrongs of traitors like Dorsey , Zuckerberg and Pichai .
Even that will only scratch the surface in repairing the damage they ’ ve done to hundreds of millions of individuals and small businesses across this planet .
The evils of censorship are technically incalculable , just as the evils of the Third Reich could never be righted via the Nuremburg Trials .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ start .
And if we are to coexist as a civil society ever again , those on the Left who conspired and colluded to suppress the human dignity of their political opponents must confess to their crimes and face a just punishment for their malicious betrayal of humanity .
I agree with every word .
The problem is that those in these positions that should be making it happen under the president , whose job it is to ensure that the laws that are being broken are faithfully executed ( Article 2 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is why they aren ’ t doing a thing except talking about it to pacify the people who are outraged .
If they were serious about dealing with these companies and the CEOs were actually afraid , action would have happened long ago , but they aren ’ t .
It ’ s time the people quit “ asking ” their representatives to “ look into things ” and start demanding they obey the Constitution and the laws that have been written under the authority of the Constitution .
Article posted @ @ @ @ @ @ @

The Health Ranger Mike Adams and owner of NaturalNews.com penned a scathing piece and called out not just the CEOs of Big Tech corporations, but also their employees as “enemies to America,” noting that now that the federal government was being censored, they are just now taking notice. Adams called “on federal law enforcement to arrest, charge and prosecute the CEOs, managers and employees of these companies for treason, racketeering and a conspiracy to defraud the United States of America.”
Here’s what Adams wrote:
DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf has now called out Twitter for its censorship, claiming the social media platform “endangers national security” with its outrageous, never-ending censorship spree.
In a scathing letter, Wolf demanded Twitter, “commit to never again censoring content” on its platform, following Twitter’s malicious censorship of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Mark Morgan.
Now that Twitter is censoring government, it seems that Big Government is beginning to finally notice how dangerous Big Tech has become. As I have relentlessly warned for the last four years, Big Tech already believes it need not answer to any government, and its CEOs like Dorsey believe they are above the law while suffering from the delusion that they alone possess a sort of twisted “divine right” to determine what people are allowed to speak, share, say or hear.
Over the last four years, I have repeatedly called for Jack Dorsey to be arrested and tried for treason, election interference, racketeering and fraud. Now, suddenly, the head of the Dept. of Homeland Security is echoing my own warnings, explaining how Twitter’s censorship is a national security threat. But isn’t it interesting that until Big Tech’s censorship authoritarianism reached the level of censoring government itself, nobody in government seemed to mind Twitter’s censorship of private sector businesses and citizens?
Now, it’s suddenly a “national security” issue. In his letter, Wolf wrote:
As the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies continue to rely on Twitter to share important information with the U.S. public, your censorship poses a threat to our security.
Twitter had censored the head of CBP for posting an update about the progress of building the border wall. In response, Twitter’s radical left-wing moderators / censors wrote:
You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.
This is the same deception that Twitter and other tech giants use against anyone working to protect children from transgenderism indoctrination, warn the public about the dangers of toxic vaccines, or defend the rights of Christians, conservatives or police officers. To the deranged, lunatic Left, any defense of police, White people, Christianity or America is “hate speech.”
In Wolf’s letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, he explained, “The acting commissioner’s tweet did none of these things… CBP guards the front line of the American homeland. CBP repels and arrests thousands of violent criminal gang members each year. CBP rescues young girls who are forced into cross-border sex trafficking. CBP intercepts dangerous drugs and contraband, including enough of the opioid fentanyl to kill every man, woman, and child in the United States several times over.”
But Twitter doesn’t care. Any talk of building a border wall is “hate speech” and must be silenced. As The Epoch Times writes:
Wolf’s letter to Dorsey came the same day Twitter decided to unfreeze the account of the New York Post. The outlet was unable to post content on its Twitter account since Oct. 14 after it shared a stories about alleged overseas business dealings of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden. Twitter stipulated that the outlet had to delete the original Biden Twitter posts before being able to tweet again, before changing its stance on Friday.
All employees of Big Tech are hereby designated enemies of America
What this episode reveals in great details is the inescapable truth that’s now apparent to everyone: It’s not just the CEOs of these tech giants that are evil, criminal fraudsters and hate-filled intolerant bigots, it’s their employees, too!
Because of their dedication to authoritarianism and the destruction of free speech, every employee of Google, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and the fake news media cartels (CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, WashPost, etc.) is an enemy of America. They despise this nation and actively work to destroy America’s border security, Constitution, Bill of Rights and rule of law.
It’s not just the criminal leaders of these organizations like Dorsey and Zuckerberg, in other words; it’s their digital jackbooted thugs who sit in their cubicles and silence all the speech they don’t want Americans to be able to read or share.
That speech includes information about America’s national security, obviously, as well as anything posted in support of law enforcement such as “thin blue line” flags, which Twitter and Facebook consider to be hate speech against BLM.
With Big Tech’s censorship, human civilization is now facing a war that’s just as dangerous and destructive as any war in human history, including World War II and the battle against Hitler’s Third Reich.
The tech companies designated enemies of America include:
Google
Apple
Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
Pinterest
Wikipedia
Instagram
We do not espouse violence against anyone working for these companies, but rather call on federal law enforcement to arrest, charge and prosecute the CEOs, managers and employees of these companies for treason, racketeering and a conspiracy to defraud the United States of America. (See below.)
Malicious censorship is no accident; it is deliberate and targeted to silence Americans while promoting the interests of communist China
Twitter and the other tech giants keep claiming their censorship is an “accident,” but that’s just a dishonest cover story. It’s clear their censorship is deliberate and that the very philosophy of authoritarianism and censorship is now systemic in the company cultures of the tech giants. You could call it, “systemic intolerance” or just plain “digital bigotry,” but the employees and contractors who work for these tech companies are, themselves, the very kind of racist, intolerant bullies they accuse Trump supporters of being. Once again, it’s all projection.
Thus, when Trump wins the election and it comes time to clean house and arrest the CEOs of the tech companies and charge them with treason, racketeering and fraud, we must remember that the employees and managers of these tech companies are complicit in crimes against the American people.
They must not be let off the hook without facing arrest and prosecution for their complicity.
Remember: As we learned from the East German soldiers manning the Berlin Wall, someone claiming, “I was just following orders” is no excuse.
The damage inflicted upon human freedom by Big Tech’s censorship is incalculable
Big Tech’s employees conspired to destroy the lives of millions of Americans who have been irreparably harmed — financially and emotionally — by the extreme and deliberate censorship policies of companies like Twitter. These employees are just as guilty as Dorsey himself, and they must face prosecution for their conspiracy of crimes against America.
Remember this as the civil war erupts due to insane, violent Leftists who are trying to carry out an extremist coup against this nation: Many of the Left’s footsoldiers who are throwing Molotov cocktails and committing arson on the streets are also employees of Big Tech. During the day, they destroy this nation on the digital battlefield; at night they burn America’s cities and small businesses to the ground, further shoring up the power of the corporate monopolists.
These people are, in essence, enemy combatants on a battlefield they declared. They are enemies of America and they must be brought down through the application of force under law. These enemies of America have already proven they are willing to abuse and exploit their power to destroy you, and their larger goal is the complete destruction of our republic. If they are not stopped by force under law, they will continue their path of total destruction until nothing remains.
Stop them now or lose America forever. And once Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Pichai and others are convicted in a court of law, America must choose a punishment for them that is consistent with the degree of human suffering they have inflicted upon millions of others. A death sentence would be far too kind. These tech CEOs must be made to endure their lawfully-decided punishments, for decades to come.
In doing so, we will be sending a message to all future would-be tyrants that America takes its freedoms seriously, and that those who conspire to destroy this nation’s First Amendment or Second Amendment will be dealt with in exactly the way they deserve.
Once the Big Tech criminals are brought to justice, the U.S. government must seize all the assets of the tech giants, shut down their operations, and redistribute all assets to those who were harmed by Big Tech’s malicious censorship. We need a nationwide class action settlement to right the wrongs of traitors like Dorsey, Zuckerberg and Pichai. Even that will only scratch the surface in repairing the damage they’ve done to hundreds of millions of individuals and small businesses across this planet. The evils of censorship are technically incalculable, just as the evils of the Third Reich could never be righted via the Nuremburg Trials.
But at least it’s a start. And if we are to coexist as a civil society ever again, those on the Left who conspired and colluded to suppress the human dignity of their political opponents must confess to their crimes and face a just punishment for their malicious betrayal of humanity.
I agree with every word. The problem is that those in these positions that should be making it happen under the president, whose job it is to ensure that the laws that are being broken are faithfully executed (Article 2, Section 3), are corrupt too. This is why they aren’t doing a thing except talking about it to pacify the people who are outraged.
If they were serious about dealing with these companies and the CEOs were actually afraid, action would have happened long ago, but they aren’t.
It’s time the people quit “asking” their representatives to “look into things” and start demanding they obey the Constitution and the laws that have been written under the authority of the Constitution.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-03--Constitutional Sheriffs:  What They Are & How to Find Or Make Them With Sheriff Richard Mack

Constitutional Sheriffs : What They Are & How to Find Or Make Them With Sheriff Richard Mack In today ’ s America , many don ’ t even read the US Constitution or The Declaration of Independence or their Bibles , much less understand and seek to apply it .
Sheriff Richard Mack of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association has come a long way since the day he chose to run for the office of sheriff .
He has learned a lot about being a constitutional sheriff since then and has been sharing his knowledge with other sheriffs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constitutional sheriffs as well .
He joins me in this episode to talk about his work .
Richard Mack , former Sheriff of Graham County , Arizona , was the first sheriff in the country to file a lawsuit against the Clinton administration to stop the gun control associated with the Brady Bill .
Mack ’ s case was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court , and which ruled 5-4 that provisions of the Brady Bill were indeed unconstitutional .
Mack spent 20 years in law enforcement and the past 17 years as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at over 120 Tea Party rallies and authored five books on states ’ rights , the oath of office and constitutional liberty .
Mack received a bachelor ’ s degree in Latin American Studies and Sociology from Brigham Young University .
He spent 11 years with the Provo , Utah Police Department and then moved to Arizona to run for Graham County Sheriff in 1988 .
While serving as sheriff , Mack received an invitation to attend the FBI National Academy , and he graduated in 1992 .
In 1994 , he was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Arizona-New Mexico Coalition of Counties and was inducted into the NRA Hall of Fame after being named NRA Law Enforcement Officer of the Year .
Gun Owners of America also awarded him the Defender of the Second Amendment Award .
In 1997 , he received the Samuel Adams award from The Local Sovereignty Coalition .
In 2010 , he received the Lifetime Achievement Award from Oath Keepers .
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty : https : //thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/ Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Constitutional Sheriffs: What They Are & How to Find Or Make Them With Sheriff Richard Mack
In today’s America, many don’t even read the US Constitution or The Declaration of Independence or their Bibles, much less understand and seek to apply it. Sheriff Richard Mack of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association has come a long way since the day he chose to run for the office of sheriff. He has learned a lot about being a constitutional sheriff since then and has been sharing his knowledge with other sheriffs around the US to help them be constitutional sheriffs as well. He joins me in this episode to talk about his work.
Richard Mack, former Sheriff of Graham County, Arizona, was the first sheriff in the country to file a lawsuit against the Clinton administration to stop the gun control associated with the Brady Bill. Mack’s case was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, and which ruled 5-4 that provisions of the Brady Bill were indeed unconstitutional.
Mack spent 20 years in law enforcement and the past 17 years as a political activist. He has appeared at over 120 Tea Party rallies and authored five books on states’ rights, the oath of office and constitutional liberty.
Mack received a bachelor’s degree in Latin American Studies and Sociology from Brigham Young University. He spent 11 years with the Provo, Utah Police Department and then moved to Arizona to run for Graham County Sheriff in 1988. While serving as sheriff, Mack received an invitation to attend the FBI National Academy, and he graduated in 1992. In 1994, he was named Elected Official of the Year by the Arizona-New Mexico Coalition of Counties and was inducted into the NRA Hall of Fame after being named NRA Law Enforcement Officer of the Year. Gun Owners of America also awarded him the Defender of the Second Amendment Award. In 1997, he received the Samuel Adams award from The Local Sovereignty Coalition. In 2010, he received the Lifetime Achievement Award from Oath Keepers.
Check out his Constitutional Sheriffs & Peace Officers website.
https://sonsoflibertyradio.com
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com
Sons of Liberty Store: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/
Support us through a donation: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/donate
Partner with us as a Son or Daughter of Liberty: https://thesonsofliberty.squarespace.com/membership/
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-03--Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter:  CDC Plans COVID Concentration Camps

Former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport has been exposing the lies of the media , politicians and government agencies regarding COVID-19 and coronavirus .
In his latest report , Rappoport exposes the Center for Disease Control ’ s plans for concentration camps for alleged COVID infections .
This sounds straight out of the late Antonin Scalia ’ s warning that internment camps would return to the US .
• Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : Missing & Unproven Viruses Is Nothing New • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : “ If The Virus Isn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
• Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter Reveals “ Missing Study ” In Coronavirus Narrative – Claims Secret Of Fraud Is In Plain Sight • Former CBS Healthwatch Reporter : Phony Test , Dangerous Drugs – Trump Is Poster Boy For COVID-19 Propaganda The CDC document is titled : “ Interim operational considerations for implementing the shielding approach to prevent COVID-19 infections in humanitarian settings , ” updated July 26 , 2020 .
Here are key quotes .
As you read them , and realize the horrific plan , keep in mind that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into these camps .
“ The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease ( ‘ high-risk ’ ) and the general population ( ‘ low-risk ’ ) .
High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘ green zones ’ established at the household , neighborhood , camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting .
They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
” “ …the shielding approach suggests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.
” “ A group of shelters such as schools , community buildings within a camp/sector ( max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone ) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together .
One entry point is used for exchange of food , supplies , etc .
A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing ( 2 meters ) .
No movement into or outside the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for an extended duration of implementation time , at least 6 months .
Explanation : The shielding approach proposes that green zones be maintained until one of the following circumstances arises : ( i ) sufficient hospitalization capacity is established ; ( ii ) effective vaccine or therapeutic options become widely available ; or ( iii ) the COVID-19 epidemic affecting the population subsides.
” How would you like to be imprisoned in one of these camps ?
IS THIS THE AMERICA YOU WANT ?
Rappoport isn ’ t the only one exposing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Del Bigtree have been doing it as well .
Governments around the world are repeating some of the darkest political moves in history by enacting mandatory camps for those who have tested positive for COVID in yet another attempt to control the virus .
Del breaks down the CDC ’ s blueprint for COVID camps they call the ‘ Shielding Approach , ’ while leaders in New Zealand , Canada , and even Southern California reveal how they will isolate those thought to be infected and their family members against their will .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ source .
We exposed this months ago when they started in Washington State .
Representative Matt Shea told The Sons of Liberty radio audience what was taking place at the time .
Hang on tight !
It ’ s going to be a bumpy ride !
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Former CBS Healthwatch reporter and author of The Matrix Revealed Jon Rappoport has been exposing the lies of the media, politicians and government agencies regarding COVID-19 and coronavirus. In his latest report, Rappoport exposes the Center for Disease Control’s plans for concentration camps for alleged COVID infections. This sounds straight out of the late Antonin Scalia’s warning that internment camps would return to the US.
Rappoport writes:
The CDC document is titled: “Interim operational considerations for implementing the shielding approach to prevent COVID-19 infections in humanitarian settings,” updated July 26, 2020. Here are key quotes.
As you read them, and realize the horrific plan, keep in mind that this system can be manipulated to order ANYONE into these camps.
This is America??
“The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.”
“…the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.”
“A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together. One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.”
“Consideration: Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months. Explanation: The shielding approach proposes that green zones be maintained until one of the following circumstances arises: (i) sufficient hospitalization capacity is established; (ii) effective vaccine or therapeutic options become widely available; or (iii) the COVID-19 epidemic affecting the population subsides.”
How would you like to be imprisoned in one of these camps?
IS THIS THE AMERICA YOU WANT?
Rappoport isn’t the only one exposing this Nazi-style nightmare. Jeffrey Jaxen and Del Bigtree have been doing it as well.
Governments around the world are repeating some of the darkest political moves in history by enacting mandatory camps for those who have tested positive for COVID in yet another attempt to control the virus. Del breaks down the CDC’s blueprint for COVID camps they call the ‘Shielding Approach,’ while leaders in New Zealand, Canada, and even Southern California reveal how they will isolate those thought to be infected and their family members against their will. Hear the terrifying plans straight from the source.
We exposed this months ago when they started in Washington State. Representative Matt Shea told The Sons of Liberty radio audience what was taking place at the time.
Hang on tight! It’s going to be a bumpy ride!
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-03--How To Nullify Roe v. Wade Without The Feds Or The Supreme Court (3 Minute Video)

How To Nullify Roe v. Wade Without The Feds Or The Supreme Court ( 3 Minute Video ) Roe v. Wade is not law despite the continued lies of presidents and supreme Court justices .
It was a ruling opinion in a single case .
Therefore , it has no sway over the states just like SCOTUS ’ ruling on anti-sodomy laws .
Now , I don ’ t want to spoil this for you if you are looking for a simple way to go after the baby murder mills in your state , so I ’ ll let constitutional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to how Roe v. Wade can be nullified in just 3 short minutes .
PH has written about this subject too in “ Why Supreme Court opinions are not the “ Law of the Land ” , and how to put federal judges in their place.
” Central to the silly arguments made by the “ Convention of States Project ” ( COSP ) is their claim that 200 years of Supreme Court opinions have increased the powers of the federal government ( as well as legalized practices such as abortion ) ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Law of the Land ” ; and we need an Article V convention so we can get amendments to the Constitution which take away all these powers the Supreme Court gave the federal government .
But the text of Article V contradicts COSP ’ s claim .
Article V shows that our Constitution can be amended only when three fourths of the States ratify proposed amendments .
The Supreme Court has no power to amend our Constitution .
And it ’ s impossible for an amendment to take away powers our Constitution doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ analyze COSP ’ s silly argument .
We begin by looking at First Principles : ♦The Judicial Branch was created by Art .
III , §1 , US Constitution .
Accordingly , it is a “ creature ” of the Constitution .
1 ♦The federal government came into existence when the States , acting through special ratifying conventions held in each of the States , ratified the Constitution.2 Since the Judicial Branch is merely a “ creature ” of the Constitution , it follows that it is subordinate to the Constitution , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It may not annul the superior authority of the States which created the Judicial Branch when they ratified the Constitution ; 3 and as a mere “ creature ” of the Constitution , it may NOT change the Constitution under which it holds its existence !
4 2 .
Supreme Court Opinions are not “ the Law of the Land ” Article VI , cl.2 , US Constit.
, the “ supremacy clause ” , defines “ supreme Law of the Land ” as the Constitution , and acts of Congress and Treaties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court opinions aren ’ t included !
Furthermore , Art .
I , §1 , US Constit.
, vests all law-making powers granted by the Constitution in Congress .
Our Constitution doesn ’ t grant any lawmaking powers to the Judicial Branch .
So why does everybody say , as we heard during the Kavanagh confirmation hearings , that Roe v. Wade is “ the Law of the Land ” ?
Because Americans have been conditioned to believe that the Supreme Court is superior to our Constitution ; that their opinions about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and we are bound by them unless and until they issue new opinions which release us from their previous opinions .
3 .
Organic & statutory law and the totally different “ common law ” precedent followed in courts Americans have been conditioned to ignore the huge distinctions between organic and statutory law , on the one hand ; and the common law which is embodied in the precedents followed by judges in litigation .
The organic laws of the United States are The Articles of Confederation was our first Constitution .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it was ratified June 21 , 1788 .
The Northwest Ordinance was superseded by the transformation of the area covered by the Ordinance into States [ pursuant to Art .
IV , §3 , cl .
2 , US Constit. ]
.
Do you see how absurd is the claim that the Supreme Court , a mere “ creature ” of the Constitution of 1787 , has the power to change the Organic Law of the United States ?
As we saw above , all legislative Powers granted by our Constitution are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , §1 ) .
Acts of Congress qualify as part of the “ supreme Law of the Land ” only when they are made pursuant to Authority granted to Congress by the Constitution ( Art.VI , cl .
2 ) .
When Acts of Congress are not authorized by the Constitution , they are mere usurpations and must be treated as such.6 The “ common law ” applied in courts in the English-speaking countries came from the Bible.7 The Bible has much to say about our relations with each other : don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maim them , don ’ t steal , don ’ t bear false witness , don ’ t tell lies about people , don ’ t be negligent , don ’ t cheat or defraud people , and such .
The Bible provides for Judges to decide disputes between people and empowers Judges to require the person who has violated these precepts to pay restitution to the person whom he harmed .
So , e.g.
, the Biblical prohibitions against bearing false witness and slandering people became our modern day concepts of slander @ @ @ @ @ @ @ principles were applied in the English courts from time immemorial , and are applied in American Courts .
Modern day American attorneys litigate these common law concepts all the time .
So if I am representing a client in an action for say , fraud , I look at the previous court opinions in the jurisdiction on fraud , and see how the courts in that jurisdiction have defined fraud – i.e.
, I look for “ precedents ” – the courts ’ previous opinions on the subject – and I expect the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ precedent .
8 THIS is the “ common law ” .
It is “ law ” in the sense that it originated with God ’ s Word ; and from “ time immemorial ” has been applied in the Courts of English speaking countries .
But this precedent is binding or persuasive only on courts .
9 As precedent for judges to follow , it is never “ the law of the land ” !
So , keep these three categories – organic , statutory , and common law – separate , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Law of the Land ” .
The latter is restricted to the Organic Law , and statutes and treaties authorized by the Organic Law .
Now let ’ s look at the constitutional jurisdiction of the federal courts .
4 .
What kinds of cases do federal courts have constitutional authority to hear ?
The ten categories of cases the Judicial Branch has authority to hear are enumerated at Art .
III , §2 , cl .
1 , US Constit .
10 The first category is cases “ arising under this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 80 ( 2nd para ) , Hamilton shows these cases concern “ provisions expressly contained ” in the Constitution .
He then points to the restrictions on the authority of the State Legislatures [ listed at Art .
I , §10 ] , and shows that if a State exercises any of those prohibited powers , and the federal government sues the State , the federal courts would have authority to hear the case ( 3rd & 13th paras ) .
So if a State enters into a Treaty , or grants Letters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paper money , or does any of the other things prohibited by Art .
I , §10 , the controversy would “ arise under the Constitution ” and the federal courts have constitutional authority to hear the case .
Likewise , if a State passed a law which violated the Constitution – say one requiring candidates in their State for US Senate to be 40 years of age – instead of the 30 years prescribed at Art .
I , §3 , cl .
3 – the federal courts have constitutional authority to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this category is to authorize the Judicial Branch to enforce the Constitution – not re-write it !
!
11 Now let ’ s look at one way the Supreme Court butchered our Constitution in order to strike down State Laws they didn ’ t like .
5 .
How the Supreme Court violated the “ arising under ” clause to hear cases they have no constitutional authority to hear Let ’ s use “ abortion ” to illustrate the usurpation .
Obviously , “ abortion ” is not “ expressly contained ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t “ arise under ” the Constitution ; and the constitutionality of State Statutes prohibiting abortion doesn ’ t fit into any of the other nine categories of cases federal courts have authority to hear .
Accordingly , federal courts have no judicial power over it .
The Supreme Court had to butcher words in our Constitution in order to usurp power to legalize abortion .
This is what they did : The original intent of §1 of the 14th Amendment was to extend citizenship to freed slaves and to provide constitutional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 1866 .
That Act protected freed slaves from Southern Black Codes which denied them God-given rights .
12 Now look at §1 where it says , “ nor shall any state deprive any person of life , liberty , or property , without due process of law ; ” That ’ s the “ due process ” clause .
As Professor Berger points out [ ibid . ]
, it has a precise meaning which goes back to the Magna Charta : it means that a person ’ s life , liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away from him except by the judgment of his peers pursuant to a fair trial .
But this is how the Supreme Court perverted the genuine meaning of that clause : In Roe v. Wade ( 1973 ) , they looked at the word , “ liberty ” in the due process clause and said , “ liberty ” means “ privacy ” , and “ privacy ” means “ a woman can kill her unborn baby ” .
13 And they claimed they had jurisdiction to overturn State Laws criminalizing abortion because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ §1 of the 14th Amendment !
[ ibid . ]
The Supreme Court redefined words in Our Constitution to justify the result they wanted in the case before them .
The Supreme Court didn ’ t “ enforce ” the Constitution – they butchered it to fabricate a “ constitutional right ” to kill unborn babies .
And the lawyers said , “ It ’ s the Law of the Land ” ; the People yawned ; and the clergy said , “ the Bible says we have to obey civil government – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to lose our 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) tax exemption !
” 6 .
What are the remedies when the Supreme Court violates the Constitution ?
The opinions of which the convention lobby complains constitute violations of our Constitution .
14 The three remedies our Framers provided or advised for judicial violations of our Constitution are : 1 “ Creature ” is the word our Founders used – e.g.
, Federalist No .
33 ( 5th para ) & Jefferson ’ s draft of The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 ( 8th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cl .
1 , US Constit.
, sets forth ratification procedures for our Constitution .
4 Madison ’ s Journal of the Federal Convention of 1787 shows that on July 23 , 1787 , the Delegates discussed who was competent to ratify the proposed new Constitution .
Col. Mason said it is “ the basis of free Government ” that only the people are competent to ratify the new Constitution , and Madison agreed that State Legislatures were incompetent to ratify the proposed Constitution – it would make essential inroads on the existing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ equally novel & dangerous to say that the Supreme Court may change the Constitution under which it holds its existence .
5 It is said England doesn ’ t have a written constitution .
6 Acts of Congress which are not authorized by the enumerated powers are void .
They are not made “ in Pursuance ” of the Constitution and have supremacy over nothing .
Federalist No .
27 ( last para ) says : See also Federalist No .
33 ( last 2 paras ) and Federalist No .
78 ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mentions the Biblical origin of the common law in The Second American Revolution .
8 Art .
III , §2 , cl.1 delegates to federal courts power to hear “ Controversies between Citizens of different States.
” Much of the litigation conducted in federal courts falls into this category .
These lawsuits aren ’ t about the Constitution .
Instead , they involve the range of issues people fight about in State Courts : personal injury , breach of contract , business disputes , fighting over property , slander & libel , etc @ @ @ @ @ @ @ judges are expected to follow the “ common law ” precedents .
9 In Federalist No .
78 ( next to last para ) , Hamilton discusses how judges are bound by “ precedents ” which define and point out their duty in the particular cases which come before them .
10 In Federalist No .
83 ( 8th para ) , Hamilton says : 11 James Madison agreed that the purpose of the “ arising under this Constitution ” clause is to enable federal courts to enforce the Constitution .
At the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1788 , he explained the categories of cases federal courts have authority to hear .
As to “ cases arising under this Constitution ” , he said : 12 This is proved in Harvard Professor Raoul Berger ’ s meticulously documented book , Government by Judiciary : The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment .
13 In Roe v. Wade ( 1973 ) , the Supreme Court said under Part VIII of their opinion : 14 Many Supreme Court opinions violate our Constitution .
( 1942 ) , discussed HERE , is another of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Congress people who don ’ t know our Constitution or The Federalist Papers ; and they are unaware of their Duty – imposed by their Oath of office – to function as a “ check ” on the Judicial Branch by impeaching federal judges who violate our Constitution .
So , pro-lifers , let ’ s start putting our money where our mouths are and start demanding the Roe v Wade be ignored and ignore the demands of the federal government on the issue of abortion , reject the federal monopoly money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t need the supreme Court to accomplish this , just enough people with a voice in each state to demand their representatives do the right thing and we can begin saving over 3,000 babies a day in the US , and honor our Creator in the process !
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

How To Nullify Roe v. Wade Without The Feds Or The Supreme Court (3 Minute Video)
Roe v. Wade is not law despite the continued lies of presidents and supreme Court justices. It was a ruling opinion in a single case. Therefore, it has no sway over the states just like SCOTUS’ ruling on anti-sodomy laws. Now, I don’t want to spoil this for you if you are looking for a simple way to go after the baby murder mills in your state, so I’ll let constitutional scholar Publius Huldah give you the answer to how Roe v. Wade can be nullified in just 3 short minutes.
PH has written about this subject too in “Why Supreme Court opinions are not the “Law of the Land”, and how to put federal judges in their place.”
She writes:
Central to the silly arguments made by the “Convention of States Project” (COSP) is their claim that 200 years of Supreme Court opinions have increased the powers of the federal government (as well as legalized practices such as abortion); that all these opinions are “the Law of the Land”; and we need an Article V convention so we can get amendments to the Constitution which take away all these powers the Supreme Court gave the federal government.
But the text of Article V contradicts COSP’s claim. Article V shows that our Constitution can be amended only when three fourths of the States ratify proposed amendments. The Supreme Court has no power to amend our Constitution. And it’s impossible for an amendment to take away powers our Constitution doesn’t grant.
1. First Principles
Let’s analyze COSP’s silly argument. We begin by looking at First Principles:
♦The Judicial Branch was created by Art. III, §1, US Constitution. Accordingly, it is a “creature” of the Constitution. 1
♦The federal government came into existence when the States, acting through special ratifying conventions held in each of the States, ratified the Constitution.2
Since the Judicial Branch is merely a “creature” of the Constitution, it follows that it is subordinate to the Constitution, and is completely subject to its terms. It may not annul the superior authority of the States which created the Judicial Branch when they ratified the Constitution; 3 and as a mere “creature” of the Constitution, it may NOT change the Constitution under which it holds its existence! 4
2. Supreme Court Opinions are not “the Law of the Land”
Article VI, cl.2, US Constit., the “supremacy clause”, defines “supreme Law of the Land” as the Constitution, and acts of Congress and Treaties which are authorized by the Constitution. Supreme Court opinions aren’t included!
Furthermore, Art. I, §1, US Constit., vests all law-making powers granted by the Constitution in Congress. Our Constitution doesn’t grant any lawmaking powers to the Judicial Branch.
So why does everybody say, as we heard during the Kavanagh confirmation hearings, that Roe v. Wade is “the Law of the Land”? Because Americans have been conditioned to believe that the Supreme Court is superior to our Constitution; that their opinions about our Constitution are “law”, and we are bound by them unless and until they issue new opinions which release us from their previous opinions.
3. Organic & statutory law and the totally different “common law” precedent followed in courts
Americans have been conditioned to ignore the huge distinctions between organic and statutory law, on the one hand; and the common law which is embodied in the precedents followed by judges in litigation.
Organic Law
Black’s Law Dictionary defines “organic law” as
“The fundamental law, or constitution, of a state or nation, written or unwritten; 5 that law or system of laws or principles which defines and establishes the organization of its government.”
The organic laws of the United States are
The Declaration of Independence – 1776
Articles of Confederation – 1777
Ordinance of 1787: The Northwest Territorial Government
Constitution of the United States – 1787
The Articles of Confederation was our first Constitution. It was replaced by our Constitution of 1787 when it was ratified June 21, 1788. The Northwest Ordinance was superseded by the transformation of the area covered by the Ordinance into States [pursuant to Art. IV, §3, cl. 2, US Constit.].
Do you see how absurd is the claim that the Supreme Court, a mere “creature” of the Constitution of 1787, has the power to change the Organic Law of the United States?
Statute Law
Black’s Law Dictionary defines “statute law” as the
“Body of written laws that have been adopted by the legislative body.”
As we saw above, all legislative Powers granted by our Constitution are vested in Congress (Art. I, §1). Acts of Congress qualify as part of the “supreme Law of the Land” only when they are made pursuant to Authority granted to Congress by the Constitution (Art.VI, cl. 2). When Acts of Congress are not authorized by the Constitution, they are mere usurpations and must be treated as such.6
Common Law
The “common law” applied in courts in the English-speaking countries came from the Bible.7 The Bible has much to say about our relations with each other: don’t murder people, don’t maim them, don’t steal, don’t bear false witness, don’t tell lies about people, don’t be negligent, don’t cheat or defraud people, and such. The Bible provides for Judges to decide disputes between people and empowers Judges to require the person who has violated these precepts to pay restitution to the person whom he harmed. So, e.g., the Biblical prohibitions against bearing false witness and slandering people became our modern day concepts of slander, libel, and defamation. These principles were applied in the English courts from time immemorial, and are applied in American Courts. Modern day American attorneys litigate these common law concepts all the time. So if I am representing a client in an action for say, fraud, I look at the previous court opinions in the jurisdiction on fraud, and see how the courts in that jurisdiction have defined fraud – i.e., I look for “precedents” – the courts’ previous opinions on the subject – and I expect the Judge on my case to obey that precedent. 8
THIS is the “common law”. It is “law” in the sense that it originated with God’s Word; and from “time immemorial” has been applied in the Courts of English speaking countries. But this precedent is binding or persuasive only on courts . 9 As precedent for judges to follow, it is never “the law of the land”!
So, keep these three categories – organic, statutory, and common law – separate, and do not confuse court precedent with the “Law of the Land”. The latter is restricted to the Organic Law, and statutes and treaties authorized by the Organic Law.
Now let’s look at the constitutional jurisdiction of the federal courts.
4. What kinds of cases do federal courts have constitutional authority to hear?
The ten categories of cases the Judicial Branch has authority to hear are enumerated at Art. III, §2, cl. 1, US Constit. 10
The first category is cases “arising under this Constitution”. In Federalist No. 80 (2nd para), Hamilton shows these cases concern “provisions expressly contained” in the Constitution. He then points to the restrictions on the authority of the State Legislatures [listed at Art. I, §10], and shows that if a State exercises any of those prohibited powers, and the federal government sues the State, the federal courts would have authority to hear the case (3rd & 13th paras).
So if a State enters into a Treaty, or grants Letters of Marque & Reprisal, or issues paper money, or does any of the other things prohibited by Art. I, §10, the controversy would “arise under the Constitution” and the federal courts have constitutional authority to hear the case.
Likewise, if a State passed a law which violated the Constitution – say one requiring candidates in their State for US Senate to be 40 years of age – instead of the 30 years prescribed at Art. I, §3, cl. 3 – the federal courts have constitutional authority to hear the case.
So the purpose of this category is to authorize the Judicial Branch to enforce the Constitution – not re-write it!! 11
Now let’s look at one way the Supreme Court butchered our Constitution in order to strike down State Laws they didn’t like.
5. How the Supreme Court violated the “arising under” clause to hear cases they have no constitutional authority to hear
Let’s use “abortion” to illustrate the usurpation. Obviously, “abortion” is not “expressly contained” in the Constitution. So abortion doesn’t “arise under” the Constitution; and the constitutionality of State Statutes prohibiting abortion doesn’t fit into any of the other nine categories of cases federal courts have authority to hear. Accordingly, federal courts have no judicial power over it. The Supreme Court had to butcher words in our Constitution in order to usurp power to legalize abortion. This is what they did:
The original intent of §1 of the 14th Amendment was to extend citizenship to freed slaves and to provide constitutional authority for the federal Civil Rights Act of 1866. That Act protected freed slaves from Southern Black Codes which denied them God-given rights. 12
Now look at §1 where it says, “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;”
That’s the “due process” clause. As Professor Berger points out [ibid.], it has a precise meaning which goes back to the Magna Charta: it means that a person’s life, liberty or property can’t be taken away from him except by the judgment of his peers pursuant to a fair trial.
But this is how the Supreme Court perverted the genuine meaning of that clause: In Roe v. Wade (1973), they looked at the word, “liberty” in the due process clause and said, “liberty” means “privacy”, and “privacy” means “a woman can kill her unborn baby”. 13
And they claimed they had jurisdiction to overturn State Laws criminalizing abortion because the issue arises under the Constitution at §1 of the 14th Amendment! [ibid.]
The Supreme Court redefined words in Our Constitution to justify the result they wanted in the case before them.
The Supreme Court didn’t “enforce” the Constitution – they butchered it to fabricate a “constitutional right” to kill unborn babies.
And the lawyers said, “It’s the Law of the Land”; the People yawned; and the clergy said, “the Bible says we have to obey civil government – besides, we don’t want to lose our 501 (c) (3) tax exemption!”
6. What are the remedies when the Supreme Court violates the Constitution?
The opinions of which the convention lobby complains constitute violations of our Constitution. 14 The three remedies our Framers provided or advised for judicial violations of our Constitution are:
1. In Federalist No. 81 (8th para), Hamilton shows Congress can impeach and remove from office federal judges who violate the Constitution. Congress is competent to decide whether federal judges have violated the Constitution! Impeachment is their “check” on the Judicial Branch.
2. In Federalist No. 78 (6th para), Hamilton shows the Judicial Branch must rely on the Executive Branch to enforce its judgments. If the President, in the exercise of his independent judgment and mindful of his Oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution”, determines that an opinion of a federal court is unconstitutional; his Duty is to refuse to enforce it . The President is also competent to decide whether federal judges have violated the Constitution! Refusing to enforce their unconstitutional judgments is his “check” on the Judicial Branch.
3. On the Right & Duty of the States – who created the federal government when they ratified the Constitution – to smack down their “creature” when their “creature” violates the Constitutional Compact the States made with each other, see Nullification: The Original Right of Self-Defense.
Endnotes:
1 “Creature” is the word our Founders used – e.g., Federalist No. 33 (5th para) & Jefferson’s draft of The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 (8th Resolution).
2Art. VII, cl. 1, US Constit., sets forth ratification procedures for our Constitution.
3 Madison’s Virginia Report of 1799-1800 (pp 190-196).
4 Madison’s Journal of the Federal Convention of 1787 shows that on July 23, 1787, the Delegates discussed who was competent to ratify the proposed new Constitution. Col. Mason said it is “the basis of free Government” that only the people are competent to ratify the new Constitution, and
“…The [State] Legislatures have no power to ratify it. They are the mere creatures of the State Constitutions, and cannot be greater than their creators…”
Madison agreed that State Legislatures were incompetent to ratify the proposed Constitution – it would make essential inroads on the existing State Constitutions, and
“…it would be a novel & dangerous doctrine that a Legislature could change the constitution under which it held its existence….”
It’s equally novel & dangerous to say that the Supreme Court may change the Constitution under which it holds its existence .
5 It is said England doesn’t have a written constitution.
6 Acts of Congress which are not authorized by the enumerated powers are void. They are not made “in Pursuance” of the Constitution and have supremacy over nothing. Federalist No. 27 (last para) says:
“…the laws of the Confederacy [the federal government], as to the ENUMERATED and LEGITIMATE objects of its jurisdiction, will become the SUPREME LAW of the land; to the observance of which all officers, legislative, executive, and judicial, in each State, will be bound by the sanctity of an oath. Thus the legislatures, courts, and magistrates, of the respective members [the States], will be incorporated into the operations of the national government AS FAR AS ITS JUST AND CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY EXTENDS…” [capitals are Hamilton’s]
See also Federalist No. 33 (last 2 paras) and Federalist No. 78 (10th para).
7 John Whitehead mentions the Biblical origin of the common law in The Second American Revolution.
8 Art. III, §2, cl.1 delegates to federal courts power to hear “Controversies between Citizens of different States.” Much of the litigation conducted in federal courts falls into this category. These lawsuits aren’t about the Constitution. Instead, they involve the range of issues people fight about in State Courts: personal injury, breach of contract, business disputes, fighting over property, slander & libel, etc. In deciding these cases, federal judges are expected to follow the “common law” precedents.
9 In Federalist No. 78 (next to last para), Hamilton discusses how judges are bound by “precedents” which define and point out their duty in the particular cases which come before them.
10 In Federalist No. 83 (8th para), Hamilton says:
“…the…authority of the federal …[courts]…is declared by the Constitution to comprehend certain cases particularly specified. The expression of those cases marks the precise limits, beyond which the federal courts cannot extend their jurisdiction…”
11 James Madison agreed that the purpose of the “arising under this Constitution” clause is to enable federal courts to enforce the Constitution. At the Virginia Ratifying convention on June 20, 1788, he explained the categories of cases federal courts have authority to hear. As to “cases arising under this Constitution”, he said:
“…That causes of a federal nature will arise, will be obvious to every gentleman, who will recollect that the states are laid under restrictions; and that the rights of the union are secured by these restrictions. They may involve equitable as well as legal controversies…”
12 This is proved in Harvard Professor Raoul Berger’s meticulously documented book, Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
13 In Roe v. Wade (1973), the Supreme Court said under Part VIII of their opinion:
“…This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is … is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy…”
14 Many Supreme Court opinions violate our Constitution. Wickard v. Filburn (1942), discussed HERE, is another of the most notorious. But we elect to Congress people who don’t know our Constitution or The Federalist Papers; and they are unaware of their Duty – imposed by their Oath of office – to function as a “check” on the Judicial Branch by impeaching federal judges who violate our Constitution.
So, pro-lifers, let’s start putting our money where our mouths are and start demanding the Roe v Wade be ignored and ignore the demands of the federal government on the issue of abortion, reject the federal monopoly money and start executing justice now! We don’t need the supreme Court to accomplish this, just enough people with a voice in each state to demand their representatives do the right thing and we can begin saving over 3,000 babies a day in the US, and honor our Creator in the process!
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


thewashingtonstandard--2020-11-03--No Vaccine for Tyranny

No Vaccine for Tyranny

The World Health Organization ( WHO ) recently admitted that lockdowns cause more harm than good .
Following this announcement , one would have expected American politicians to immediately end the lockdowns .
After all , the WHO ‘ s pronouncements are considered infallible , so much so that social media sites silence anyone who dares challenge the great and powerful WHO .
Yet , governors , mayors , and other government officials across the country are ignoring the WHO ’ s anti-lockdown position .
Instead of admitting that the lockdowns were a mistake , many in the political class @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medical professionals whose positions and prestige depend on government , claim that we can not return to normalcy until a coronavirus vaccine is in wide use .
This suggests that people among the majority of Americans who do not wish to be vaccinated will remain under lockdown or be forced to be vaccinated against their will .
The assault on our liberty will not end with deployment and use of a vaccine .
Moncef Slaoui , the chief adviser of the Trump administration ’ s Operation Warp Speed , a “ public-private partnership @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a coronavirus vaccine , has said that those who receive a vaccine will be monitored by “ incredibly precise … tracking systems.
” Slaoui has also indicated that tech giants Google and Oracle will help the government keep tabs on the vaccinated individuals .
So , the vaccine program will lead to an increase in government surveillance !
Slaoui is just the latest “ expert ” to endorse forcing the American people to relinquish their few remaining scraps of privacy to stop coronavirus .
Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates have urged development @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for coronavirus .
People without the certificate would find their liberty severely restricted .
Those who think that the new surveillance system will be limited to coronavirus should remember that Social Security numbers were only supposed to be used to administer the Social Security program .
They should also consider that the PATRIOT Act ’ s expansion of warrantless wiretapping was supposed to be limited to stopping terrorists .
However , these powers have been used for a wide variety of purposes .
Whenever government is given power to abuse our rights for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power to abuse our rights for other reasons as well .
Fauci and Gates ’ digital certificate could , and likely will , be expanded to include proof individuals have received a variety of other vaccines and medical treatments .
The digital certificate could even extend to monitoring a person ’ s lifestyle choices on the grounds that unhealthy habits make one more susceptible to diseases .
The digital certificate could also be tied to the REAL ID program to deny individuals who have not been vaccinated the right to travel .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandatory E-Verify system to deny unvaccinated individuals the right to hold a job .
Those who consider this “ paranoia ” should consider Britain is already developing a covid passport .
Liberty lost in the “ war on covid ” will not be voluntarily returned when the coronavirus threat ends — assuming the government ever stop moving the goal posts and declares the coronavirus threat is over .
Instead , the people must be prepared to take back their liberty from the politicians .
Fortunately , we still have the ability to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our fellow citizens and pressuring our elected officials to reverse course .
We must all do what we can to use these peaceful tools before we are in a “ dark winter ” of authoritarianism .
Dr. Ron Paul is an American physician , author , and former politician who served as the U.S. Representative for Texas 's 14th congressional district , which includes Galveston , from 1997 to 2013 as well as the 22nd congressional district for special term between 1976 and 1977 , when he lost reelection in 1978 , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 1985 .
On three occasions , he sought the presidency of the United States : as the Libertarian Party candidate in 1988 and as a candidate in the Republican primaries in 2008 and 2012 .
Paul is best known for his libertarian views and is a critic of American foreign , domestic , and monetary policies , including the military–industrial complex , the War on Drugs , and the Federal Reserve .
Paul has been married to Carol Wells since 1957 .
They have five children , 18 grandchildren and 4 great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ column known as Ron Paul 's Texas Straight Talk and is the author of several books

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently admitted that lockdowns cause more harm than good. Following this announcement, one would have expected American politicians to immediately end the lockdowns. After all, the WHO ‘s pronouncements are considered infallible, so much so that social media sites silence anyone who dares challenge the great and powerful WHO. Yet, governors, mayors, and other government officials across the country are ignoring the WHO’s anti-lockdown position.
Instead of admitting that the lockdowns were a mistake, many in the political class, which includes a disturbing number of medical professionals whose positions and prestige depend on government, claim that we cannot return to normalcy until a coronavirus vaccine is in wide use. This suggests that people among the majority of Americans who do not wish to be vaccinated will remain under lockdown or be forced to be vaccinated against their will.
The assault on our liberty will not end with deployment and use of a vaccine. Moncef Slaoui, the chief adviser of the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed, a “public-private partnership” in charge of producing and delivering a coronavirus vaccine, has said that those who receive a vaccine will be monitored by “incredibly precise … tracking systems.” Slaoui has also indicated that tech giants Google and Oracle will help the government keep tabs on the vaccinated individuals. So, the vaccine program will lead to an increase in government surveillance!
Slaoui is just the latest “expert” to endorse forcing the American people to relinquish their few remaining scraps of privacy to stop coronavirus. Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates have urged development of a digital certificate for those vaccinated for coronavirus. People without the certificate would find their liberty severely restricted.
Those who think that the new surveillance system will be limited to coronavirus should remember that Social Security numbers were only supposed to be used to administer the Social Security program. They should also consider that the PATRIOT Act’s expansion of warrantless wiretapping was supposed to be limited to stopping terrorists. However, these powers have been used for a wide variety of purposes. Whenever government is given power to abuse our rights for one reason it will inevitably use that power to abuse our rights for other reasons as well.
Fauci and Gates’ digital certificate could, and likely will, be expanded to include proof individuals have received a variety of other vaccines and medical treatments. The digital certificate could even extend to monitoring a person’s lifestyle choices on the grounds that unhealthy habits make one more susceptible to diseases.
The digital certificate could also be tied to the REAL ID program to deny individuals who have not been vaccinated the right to travel. It could also be combined with a future mandatory E-Verify system to deny unvaccinated individuals the right to hold a job. Those who consider this “paranoia” should consider Britain is already developing a covid passport.
Liberty lost in the “war on covid” will not be voluntarily returned when the coronavirus threat ends — assuming the government ever stop moving the goal posts and declares the coronavirus threat is over. Instead, the people must be prepared to take back their liberty from the politicians. Fortunately, we still have the ability to do so by the peaceful means of educating our fellow citizens and pressuring our elected officials to reverse course. We must all do what we can to use these peaceful tools before we are in a “dark winter” of authoritarianism.
Article posted with permission from Ron Paul