shtfplan--2020-11-19--The United Nations and the Origins of “The Great Reset”

This article was originally published by Antony P. Mueller at The Mises Institute .
About twenty-four hundred years ago , the Greek philosopher Plato came up with the idea of constructing the state and society according to an elaborate plan .
Plato wanted “ wise men ” ( philosophers ) at the helm of the government , but he made it also clear that his kind of state would need a transformation of the humans .
In modern times , the promoters of the omnipotent state want to substitute Plato ’ s philosopher with the expert and create the new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called transhumanism .
The United Nations and its various sub-organizations play a pivotal role in this project which has reached its present stage in the project of the Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset .
The Great Reset did not come from nowhere .
The first modern attempts to create a global institution with a governmental function were launched by the government of Woodrow Wilson who acted as US president from 1913 to 1921 .
Under the inspiration of Colonel Mandell House , the president ’ s prime advisor and best friend , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the period after World War I .
Yet the plan of American participation in the League of Nations failed and the drive toward internationalism and establishing a new world order receded during the Roaring Twenties .
A new move toward managing a society like an organization , however , came during the Great Depression .
Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not let the crisis go by without driving the agenda forward with his “ New Deal.
” FDR was especially interested in the special executive privileges that came with the Second World War @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moved forward to lay the groundwork for a new League of Nations , which was now to be named the United Nations .
Under the leadership of Stalin , Churchill , and Roosevelt , twenty-six nations agreed in January 1942 to the initiative of establishing a United Nations Organization ( UNO ) , which came into existence on October 24 , 1945 .
Since its inception , the United Nations and its branches , such as the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , have prepared the countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goals that were announced at its foundation .
Yet the unctuous pronouncements of promoting “ international peace and security , ” “ developing friendly relations among nations , ” and working for “ social progress , better living standards , and human rights ” hides the agenda of establishing a world government with executive powers whose task would not be promoting liberty and free markets but greater interventionism and control through cultural and scientific organizations .
This became clear with the creation of the United Nations Educational , Scientific and Cultural Organization ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foundation of UNESCO in 1945 , the English evolutionary biologist , eugenicist , and declared globalist Julian Huxley ( the brother of Aldous Huxley , author of Brave New World ) became its first director .
At the launch of the organization , Huxley called for a “ scientific world humanism , global in extent ” ( p. 8 ) and asked to manipulate human evolution to a “ desirable ” end .
Referring to dialectical materialism as “ the first radical attempt at an evolutionary philosophy ” ( p. 11 ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Marxist approach to changing society was bound to fail because of its lack of an indispensable “ biological component.
” With these ideas , Julian Huxley was in respectable company .
Since the late nineteenth century , the call for the genetic betterment of the human race through eugenics has been gaining many prominent followers .
John Maynard Keynes , for example , held the promotion of eugenics and population control as one the most important social questions and a crucial area of research .
Keynes was not alone .
The list of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its own betterment is quite large and impressive .
These “ illiberal reformers ” include , among many other well-known names , the writers H.G .
Wells and G.B .
Shaw , US president Theodore Roosevelt , and British prime minister Winston Churchill as well as the economist Irving Fisher and the family-planning pioneers Margaret Sanger and Bill Gates Sr. , the father of Bill Gates , Microsoft co-founder and head of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
In his discourse at the foundation of the UNESCO , Julian Huxley was quite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this institution .
To achieve the desired “ evolutionary progress ” of mankind , the first step must be to stress “ the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.
” Furthermore , the institution must consider the tradeoff between the “ importance of quality as against quantity ” ( p. 14 ) , which means it must take into account that there is , “ an optimum range of size for every human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” ( p. 15 ) .
The educational , scientific , and cultural organization of the UN should give special attention to “ unity-in-variety of the world ’ s art and culture as well as the promotion of one single pool of scientific knowledge ” ( p 17 ) .
Huxley makes it clear that human diversity is not for all .
Variety for “ weaklings , fools , and moral deficients… can not but be bad , ” and because a “ considerable percentage of the population is not capable of profiting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ considerable percentage of young men ” suffer from “ physical weakness or mental instability ” and “ these grounds are often genetic in origin ” ( p. 20 ) , these groups must be excluded from the efforts of advancing human progress .
In his discourse , Huxley diagnosed that at the time of his writing the “ indirect effect of civilization ” is rather “ dysgenic instead of eugenic ” and that “ in any case , it seems likely that the deadweight of genetic stupidity , physical weakness , mental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exist in the human species , will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved ” ( p. 21 ) .
After all , it is “ essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science , for as already indicated , in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent , and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics ” ( pp .
37–38 ) .
Use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ step toward the global economic transformation was taken with the first report of the Club of Rome .
In 1968 , the Club of Rome was initiated at the Rockefeller estate Bellagio in Italy .
Its first report was published in 1972 under the title “ The Limits to Growth.
” The president emeritus of the Club of Rome , Alexander King , and the secretary of the club , General Bertrand Schneider , inform in their Report of the Council of the Club of Rome that when the members of the club @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enemy , they listed pollution , global warming , water shortages , and famines as the most opportune items to be blamed on humanity with the implication that humanity itself must be reduced to keep these threats in check .
Since the 1990s , several comprehensive initiatives toward a global system of control have been undertaken by the United Nations with Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030 .
The 2030 Agenda was adopted by all United Nations member states in 2015 .
It launched its blueprint for global change with the call to achieve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The key concept is “ sustainable development ” which includes population control as a crucial instrument .
Saving the earth has become the slogan of green policy warriors .
Since the 1970s , the horror scenario of global warming has been a useful tool in their hands to gain political influence and finally rule over public discourse .
In the meanwhile , these anti-capitalist groups have obtained a dominant influence in the media , the educational and judicial systems , and have become major players in the political arena .
In many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so-called green parties have become a pivotal factor in the political system .
Many of the representatives are quite open in their demands to make society and the economy compatible with high ecological standards that require a profound reset of the present system .
In 1945 , Huxley ( p. 21 ) noted that it is too early to propose outright a eugenic depopulation program but advised that it will be important for the organization “ to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.
” Huxley ’ s caution is no longer necessary .
In the meantime , the branches of the United Nations have gained such a level of power that even originally minor UN sub-organizations such as the World Health Organization ( WHO ) have been enabled to command individual governments around the world to obey their orders .
The WHO and the International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) —whose conditionality for loans has changed from fiscal restraint to the degree to which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the WHO—have become the supreme tandem to work toward establishing the new world order .
As Julian Huxley pointed out in his discourse in 1945 , it is the task of the United Nations to do away with economic freedom , because “ laisser-faire and capitalist economic systems ” have “ created a great deal of ugliness ” ( p. 38 ) .
The time has come to work toward the emergence “ of a single world culture ” ( p. 61 ) .
This must be done with the explicit help of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
With the foundation of the United Nations and its sub-organizations , the drive to advance the programs of eugenics and transhumanism took a big step forward .
Together with the activities of the Club of Rome , they have to initiate the great reset that is going on currently .
With the pronouncement of a pandemic , the goal of comprehensive government control of the economy and society has taken another leap toward transforming the economy and society .
Freedom faces a new enemy .
The tyranny comes under the disguise of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new rulers do not justify their right to dominance because of divine providence but now claim the right to rule the people in the name of universal health and safety based on presumed scientific evidence .

This article was originally published by Antony P. Mueller at The Mises Institute.
About twenty-four hundred years ago, the Greek philosopher Plato came up with the idea of constructing the state and society according to an elaborate plan. Plato wanted “wise men” (philosophers) at the helm of the government, but he made it also clear that his kind of state would need a transformation of the humans.
In modern times, the promoters of the omnipotent state want to substitute Plato’s philosopher with the expert and create the new man through eugenics, which is now called transhumanism. The United Nations and its various sub-organizations play a pivotal role in this project which has reached its present stage in the project of the Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset.
The Struggle for a World Government
The Great Reset did not come from nowhere. The first modern attempts to create a global institution with a governmental function were launched by the government of Woodrow Wilson who acted as US president from 1913 to 1921. Under the inspiration of Colonel Mandell House, the president’s prime advisor and best friend, Wilson wanted to establish a world forum for the period after World War I. Yet the plan of American participation in the League of Nations failed and the drive toward internationalism and establishing a new world order receded during the Roaring Twenties.
A new move toward managing a society like an organization, however, came during the Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not let the crisis go by without driving the agenda forward with his “New Deal.” FDR was especially interested in the special executive privileges that came with the Second World War. Resistance was almost nil when he moved forward to lay the groundwork for a new League of Nations, which was now to be named the United Nations.
Under the leadership of Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, twenty-six nations agreed in January 1942 to the initiative of establishing a United Nations Organization (UNO), which came into existence on October 24, 1945. Since its inception, the United Nations and its branches, such as the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization (WHO), have prepared the countries of the world to comply with the goals that were announced at its foundation.
Yet the unctuous pronouncements of promoting “international peace and security,” “developing friendly relations among nations,” and working for “social progress, better living standards, and human rights” hides the agenda of establishing a world government with executive powers whose task would not be promoting liberty and free markets but greater interventionism and control through cultural and scientific organizations. This became clear with the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1945.
Eugenics
After the foundation of UNESCO in 1945, the English evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and declared globalist Julian Huxley (the brother of Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World) became its first director.
At the launch of the organization, Huxley called for a “scientific world humanism, global in extent” (p. 8) and asked to manipulate human evolution to a “desirable” end. Referring to dialectical materialism as “the first radical attempt at an evolutionary philosophy” (p. 11), the director of UNESCO laments that the Marxist approach to changing society was bound to fail because of its lack of an indispensable “biological component.”
With these ideas, Julian Huxley was in respectable company. Since the late nineteenth century, the call for the genetic betterment of the human race through eugenics has been gaining many prominent followers. John Maynard Keynes, for example, held the promotion of eugenics and population control as one the most important social questions and a crucial area of research.
Keynes was not alone. The list of advocates of breeding the human race for its own betterment is quite large and impressive. These “illiberal reformers” include, among many other well-known names, the writers H.G. Wells and G.B. Shaw, US president Theodore Roosevelt, and British prime minister Winston Churchill as well as the economist Irving Fisher and the family-planning pioneers Margaret Sanger and Bill Gates Sr., the father of Bill Gates, Microsoft co-founder and head of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
In his discourse at the foundation of the UNESCO, Julian Huxley was quite specific about the goals and methods of this institution. To achieve the desired “evolutionary progress” of mankind, the first step must be to stress “the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.”
Furthermore, the institution must consider the tradeoff between the “importance of quality as against quantity” (p. 14), which means it must take into account that there is, “an optimum range of size for every human organization as for every type of organism” (p. 15). The educational, scientific, and cultural organization of the UN should give special attention to “unity-in-variety of the world’s art and culture as well as the promotion of one single pool of scientific knowledge” (p 17).
Huxley makes it clear that human diversity is not for all. Variety for “weaklings, fools, and moral deficients…cannot but be bad,” and because a “considerable percentage of the population is not capable of profiting from higher education” and also a “considerable percentage of young men” suffer from “physical weakness or mental instability” and “these grounds are often genetic in origin” (p. 20), these groups must be excluded from the efforts of advancing human progress.
In his discourse, Huxley diagnosed that at the time of his writing the “indirect effect of civilization” is rather “dysgenic instead of eugenic” and that “in any case, it seems likely that the deadweight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved” (p. 21). After all, it is “essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent, and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics” (pp. 37–38).
Use of the Climate Threat
The next decisive step toward the global economic transformation was taken with the first report of the Club of Rome. In 1968, the Club of Rome was initiated at the Rockefeller estate Bellagio in Italy. Its first report was published in 1972 under the title “The Limits to Growth.”
The president emeritus of the Club of Rome, Alexander King, and the secretary of the club, General Bertrand Schneider, inform in their Report of the Council of the Club of Rome that when the members of the club were in search of identifying a new enemy, they listed pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famines as the most opportune items to be blamed on humanity with the implication that humanity itself must be reduced to keep these threats in check.
Since the 1990s, several comprehensive initiatives toward a global system of control have been undertaken by the United Nations with Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030. The 2030 Agenda was adopted by all United Nations member states in 2015. It launched its blueprint for global change with the call to achieve seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs). The key concept is “sustainable development” which includes population control as a crucial instrument.
Saving the earth has become the slogan of green policy warriors. Since the 1970s, the horror scenario of global warming has been a useful tool in their hands to gain political influence and finally rule over public discourse. In the meanwhile, these anti-capitalist groups have obtained a dominant influence in the media, the educational and judicial systems, and have become major players in the political arena.
In many countries, particularly in Europe, the so-called green parties have become a pivotal factor in the political system. Many of the representatives are quite open in their demands to make society and the economy compatible with high ecological standards that require a profound reset of the present system.
In 1945, Huxley (p. 21) noted that it is too early to propose outright a eugenic depopulation program but advised that it will be important for the organization “to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Huxley’s caution is no longer necessary. In the meantime, the branches of the United Nations have gained such a level of power that even originally minor UN sub-organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) have been enabled to command individual governments around the world to obey their orders. The WHO and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)—whose conditionality for loans has changed from fiscal restraint to the degree to which a country follows the rules set by the WHO—have become the supreme tandem to work toward establishing the new world order.
As Julian Huxley pointed out in his discourse in 1945, it is the task of the United Nations to do away with economic freedom, because “laisser-faire and capitalist economic systems” have “created a great deal of ugliness” (p. 38). The time has come to work toward the emergence “of a single world culture” (p. 61). This must be done with the explicit help of the mass media and the educational systems.
Conclusion
With the foundation of the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the drive to advance the programs of eugenics and transhumanism took a big step forward. Together with the activities of the Club of Rome, they have to initiate the great reset that is going on currently. With the pronouncement of a pandemic, the goal of comprehensive government control of the economy and society has taken another leap toward transforming the economy and society. Freedom faces a new enemy. The tyranny comes under the disguise of expert rule and benevolent dictatorship. The new rulers do not justify their right to dominance because of divine providence but now claim the right to rule the people in the name of universal health and safety based on presumed scientific evidence.


shtfplan--2020-11-19--MSM Wants You To CANCEL Your Thanksgiving

The mainstream media is telling people to cancel their Thanksgiving .
They say it ’ s to prevent the spread of COVID-19 .
Social media users content living in tyranny are already shaming those who are choosing to continue living their lives .
“ At the risk of sounding like the Thanksgiving Grinch , let me be clear : A big feast with all of your loved ones is unnecessary , perhaps even immoral , during a global pandemic , ” writes Suzette Hackney for USA Today .
“ There really should be no debate .
COVID-19 has canceled traditional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ puppets for the draconian elitists in government and the banking system desperately want your life to be upended and to destroy what it means to be a human .
Why do you think they are pushing masks which have been shown to be ineffective at preventing the coronavirus ?
Because it ’ s a ritualistic dehumanizing shame ritual .
Last week , Chicago ’ s mayor issued a stay-at-home advisory effective for 30 days .
Michigan Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer shut down in-person classes at high schools and colleges , along with indoor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for three weeks .
Washington Gov .
Jay Inslee restricted indoor gatherings , eat-in restaurants , and shuttered gyms for at least four weeks .
On Monday , officials in Philadelphiaannounced that all public or private indoor gatherings of any size are banned at least through Jan. 1 .
California Gov .
Gavin Newsom also announced that indoor dining , gyms , and movie theaters must either remain closed or shut down in 41 of the state ’ s 58 counties .
–USA Today Ohio & Illinois Order More Lockdowns and Restrictions As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end until we as the public on a whole decide that we ’ ve had enough .
It ’ s up to us .
The mainstream media is also propagating the public with an attempt to convince them to let go of all of their freedom , including privacy within their own homes .
The “ hope ” the mainstream media is sticking to is that a vaccine is on the horizon .
Just roll up your sleeve and take this rushed concoction of God only knows what and everything will be fine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine won ’ t make things go back to normal .
They Moved The Goalposts…AGAIN !
: “ It ’ s Not Over When The Vaccine Arrives ”

The mainstream media is telling people to cancel their Thanksgiving. They say it’s to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Social media users content living in tyranny are already shaming those who are choosing to continue living their lives.
“At the risk of sounding like the Thanksgiving Grinch, let me be clear: A big feast with all of your loved ones is unnecessary, perhaps even immoral, during a global pandemic,” writes Suzette Hackney for USA Today. “There really should be no debate. COVID-19 has canceled traditional Thanksgiving,” Hackney adds.
These puppets for the draconian elitists in government and the banking system desperately want your life to be upended and to destroy what it means to be a human. Why do you think they are pushing masks which have been shown to be ineffective at preventing the coronavirus? Because it’s a ritualistic dehumanizing shame ritual.
CDC Study: Most COVID-19 Cases Were Admitted Mask Wearers
Last week, Chicago’s mayor issued a stay-at-home advisory effective for 30 days. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer shut down in-person classes at high schools and colleges, along with indoor dining, casinos, and movie theaters for three weeks. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee restricted indoor gatherings, eat-in restaurants, and shuttered gyms for at least four weeks. On Monday, officials in Philadelphiaannounced that all public or private indoor gatherings of any size are banned at least through Jan. 1. California Gov. Gavin Newsom also announced that indoor dining, gyms, and movie theaters must either remain closed or shut down in 41 of the state’s 58 counties. –USA Today
Ohio & Illinois Order More Lockdowns and Restrictions As COVID-19 Cases Surge
This tyranny will not end until we as the public on a whole decide that we’ve had enough. It’s up to us. The mainstream media is also propagating the public with an attempt to convince them to let go of all of their freedom, including privacy within their own homes.
The problem is what people are doing behind closed doors. It’s what we don’t see that is contributing to surging numbers of cases. –Suzette Hackney for USA Today
The “hope” the mainstream media is sticking to is that a vaccine is on the horizon. Just roll up your sleeve and take this rushed concoction of God only knows what and everything will be fine. Except, they have already said a vaccine won’t make things go back to normal.
They Moved The Goalposts…AGAIN!: “It’s Not Over When The Vaccine Arrives”


shtfplan--2020-11-19--ALERT: Operation Warp Speed General Said “The Whole of America” Will Be Vaxxed Within 24 Hours

The general in charge of Operation Warp Speed has said that all Americans must be forced to take a COVID-19 vaccine within 24 hours of it receiving emergency use authorization .
“ Upon emergency use authorization , all of America must receive [ the ] vaccine within 24 hours , ” Gus Perna said .
A panel of Operation Warp Speed ( OWS ) officials met in Washington , D.C. to give reporters an update on the vaccine .
They are Army General Gustave F. Perna , chief operations officer for Operation Warp Speed ; Health and Human Services Secretary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moncef Slaoui , chief advisor for OWS .
“ We ’ re bringing this whole-of-America approach from government to industry , and we ’ re bringing it all together to ensure that safe and effective vaccines are delivered to the American people in a timely manner , ” Perna added .
“ [ As for ] the time associated with delivery , we will begin distribution of the vaccine within 24 hours after an emergency-use authorization is approved , and only after the science has determined and approved it accordingly .
Then we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” That means that within 24 hours of a vaccine receiving the EUA , the vaccine will be forced on the public , according to the government ’ s own website , Defense.gov .
This is coming shortly .
I will not pretend to tell you what ’ s right for you , but if you intend to say “ no ” to this vaccine , they will attempt every type of coercion and force to get you to comply .
Medical Journal : Get The COVID-19 Vaccine , Or Be Punished HARSHLY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ December , about 40-million doses of these two vaccines are expected to be available for distribution , pending FDA authorization , he said .
And that ’ s enough to vaccinate about 20 million of the most vulnerable Americans , he added .
“ Production , of course , would continue to ramp up after that , ” Azar said , adding , “ We ’ ve been laying the groundwork for distribution and administration for months .
”

The general in charge of Operation Warp Speed has said that all Americans must be forced to take a COVID-19 vaccine within 24 hours of it receiving emergency use authorization. “Upon emergency use authorization, all of America must receive [the] vaccine within 24 hours,” Gus Perna said.
A panel of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) officials met in Washington, D.C. to give reporters an update on the vaccine. They are Army General Gustave F. Perna, chief operations officer for Operation Warp Speed; Health and Human Services Secretary Alex M. Azar II; and Dr. Moncef Slaoui, chief advisor for OWS.
“We’re bringing this whole-of-America approach from government to industry, and we’re bringing it all together to ensure that safe and effective vaccines are delivered to the American people in a timely manner,” Perna added. “[As for] the time associated with delivery, we will begin distribution of the vaccine within 24 hours after an emergency-use authorization is approved, and only after the science has determined and approved it accordingly. Then we are poised and ready to begin distribution.” That means that within 24 hours of a vaccine receiving the EUA, the vaccine will be forced on the public, according to the government’s own website, Defense.gov.

This is coming shortly. I will not pretend to tell you what’s right for you, but if you intend to say “no” to this vaccine, they will attempt every type of coercion and force to get you to comply.
Medical Journal: Get The COVID-19 Vaccine, Or Be Punished HARSHLY
Azar said that by the end of December, about 40-million doses of these two vaccines are expected to be available for distribution, pending FDA authorization, he said. And that’s enough to vaccinate about 20 million of the most vulnerable Americans, he added. “Production, of course, would continue to ramp up after that,” Azar said, adding, “We’ve been laying the groundwork for distribution and administration for months.”
Alan “The-State-Can-Plunge-A-Needle-In-Your-Arm” Dershowitz Is In Epstein’s “Little Black Book”


shtfplan--2020-11-19--New Medical Study: Your Face Mask Is Not Protecting You

The long-awaited medical study from Denmark examining the ability of face masks to protect people from coronavirus was finally published on Wednesday .
This study provides evidence counter to the propaganda dominant in media and government communications .
Providing good news for people suffering through wearing masks , and bad news for the politicians and businesses pushing the uncomfortable , dangerous , and dehumanizing dress code , the newly released medical study indicates face masks are not protecting people from coronavirus .
Most of us can see this with our own eyes .
People are masked up everywhere , yet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those contracting COVID-19 are religious mask wearers .
Not to mention a hot mic moment when two politicians admitted that wearing a mask is political theatre .
And still , people are putting on the ritualistic shame muzzle just because some liar in a suit ordered them to .
When did humans transform into such gullible mindless sheep ?
Most Western elites are telegraphing the message that we will be forced to cover our humanity with cheap Chinese face burkas indefinitely .
They are mandating that even two-year-olds must wear masks .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and behavioral problems and development of infants and toddlers is enormous .
For such an unconstitutional invasion of personal liberty , they are responsible to show us some amazing degree of effectiveness of this cultish ritual .
In fact , the data show the opposite .
–The Blaze No medical journal wanted to publish this study because it fails to follow the narrative handed down by tyrants .
In fact , three medical journals were so averse to publishing its findings .
However , science and facts are still more important than cult @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study was finally published yesterday in the prestigious Annals of Internal Medicine .
The study completely obliterates the cultish devotion to masks .
The results of this massive real-life controlled experiment show that the group that wore surgical masks in April experienced a 0.38 % lower infection rate than the control group that did not wear masks .
That is about one-third of one percent , which is so low that it could just be statistically random variances that demonstrate no definitive efficacy even to that infinitesimal level .
“ The recommendation to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50 % in a community with modest infection rates , some degree of social distancing , and uncommon general mask use , ” concluded the authors .
“ The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection.
” It appears that the study ’ s authors had to twist their tongues in order to get this study published by noting that “ the estimates were imprecise and statistically compatible with an effect ranging from a 46 % decrease to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They of course had to concede that their study doesn ’ t definitely rule out the idea that masks could be effective !
–The Blaze The problem is every place has seen the virus spread to everyone in the ensuing months , including in places with 100 % mask compliance .
The Danish study results clearly corroborate what we see with our own eyes in all environments .
As we have said from the beginning , this is not about health .
It ’ s about control .
Just how far does this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and realize it ?

The long-awaited medical study from Denmark examining the ability of face masks to protect people from coronavirus was finally published on Wednesday. This study provides evidence counter to the propaganda dominant in media and government communications.
Providing good news for people suffering through wearing masks, and bad news for the politicians and businesses pushing the uncomfortable, dangerous, and dehumanizing dress code, the newly released medical study indicates face masks are not protecting people from coronavirus. Most of us can see this with our own eyes. People are masked up everywhere, yet cases are spiking and the majority of those contracting COVID-19 are religious mask wearers.
CDC Study: Most COVID-19 Cases Were Admitted Mask Wearers
Not to mention a hot mic moment when two politicians admitted that wearing a mask is political theatre. And still, people are putting on the ritualistic shame muzzle just because some liar in a suit ordered them to. When did humans transform into such gullible mindless sheep?
Most Western elites are telegraphing the message that we will be forced to cover our humanity with cheap Chinese face burkas indefinitely. They are mandating that even two-year-olds must wear masks. The long-term effects on the lungs, emotional and behavioral problems and development of infants and toddlers is enormous. For such an unconstitutional invasion of personal liberty, they are responsible to show us some amazing degree of effectiveness of this cultish ritual. In fact, the data show the opposite. –The Blaze
No medical journal wanted to publish this study because it fails to follow the narrative handed down by tyrants. In fact, three medical journals were so averse to publishing its findings. However, science and facts are still more important than cult rituals to some. The Danish mask study was finally published yesterday in the prestigious Annals of Internal Medicine. The study completely obliterates the cultish devotion to masks. The results of this massive real-life controlled experiment show that the group that wore surgical masks in April experienced a 0.38% lower infection rate than the control group that did not wear masks. That is about one-third of one percent, which is so low that it could just be statistically random variances that demonstrate no definitive efficacy even to that infinitesimal level.
“The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use,” concluded the authors. “The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection.”
It appears that the study’s authors had to twist their tongues in order to get this study published by noting that “the estimates were imprecise and statistically compatible with an effect ranging from a 46% decrease to a 23% increase in infection.” They of course had to concede that their study doesn’t definitely rule out the idea that masks could be effective! –The Blaze
Double-negatives in science are just hilarious. The Danish study had to eat a bunch of mouth worms to get the thing published. Concluding line: “…cannot statistically exclude no effect.” pic.twitter.com/xuyJRy4RS6 — Justin Hart (@justin_hart) November 18, 2020
The problem is every place has seen the virus spread to everyone in the ensuing months, including in places with 100% mask compliance. The Danish study results clearly corroborate what we see with our own eyes in all environments.
As we have said from the beginning, this is not about health. It’s about control. Just how far does this have to go before people wake up and realize it?


shtfplan--2020-11-20--Vaccines–Too Little, Too Late?

Vaccines–Too Little, Too Late?

This article was originally published by Charles Hugh Smith at Of Two Minds Blog .
Trust in institutions , authorities , and Big Pharma is scraping the bottom of the barrel , and rushing these vaccines into mass use with extremely high expectations of efficacy is setting up the potential for a devastating loss of trust in the vaccines should they fail to live up to the claims of 100 % safety and 95 % effectiveness .
We ’ re being assured by Pfizer and Moderna that their Covid vaccines are 95 % effective and are safe enough to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Before accepting these extremely consequential claims , let ’ s look at the actual testing process and results .
In the Pfizer trial , half of the 44,000 volunteers received the vaccine and the other half got a placebo shot .
Then the researchers waited around to see how many of the volunteers randomly came down with Covid .
Pfizer reported that out of 170 cases of Covid , 162 were in the placebo group and eight were in the vaccine group .
So a total of 0.386 % of the 44,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unknown , and this tiny sample is the foundation of grandiose claims of 95 % effectiveness ?
Note the incredibly small sample size .
If even 3 % of the test group had contracted Covid , the sample size would be 1,320 people–still a small number but considerably more persuasive than 1/3rd of 1 % ( 170 ) .
These results tell us very little about what we really need to know .
Allow me to propose a test protocol that would tell us what we need to know .
Take 100 politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , give them two doses of vaccine and then have them serve 4-hour shifts in a crowded ward of severely ill Covid patients for a week , without any masks or protective gear .
In other words , expose them to sustained , intimate contact with patients with severe cases of Covid , spending hours every day in a soup of virus .
If 100 people took the measles vaccine , would they hesitate to expose themselves to measles patients ?
No , because the measles vaccine is close to 100 % effective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ executives refused to participate in this trial , that would tell us all we really need to know about the effectiveness of their Covid vaccine .
But the trial isn ’ t finished–not by a long shot .
We need to know if the vaccinated people can still transmit the virus to unvaccinated people .
So at the end of their shift , the 100 politicians , authorities , and Big Pharma execs clean up and then crowd into a poorly ventilated bar with 100 unvaccinated volunteers , singing , dancing , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hours every night .
Next , repeat this trial protocol with another 100 people , 50 of whom have chronic conditions such as hypertension , metabolic disorders , or COPD , and 50 who are 65 years of age or older .
The only way we ’ ll really know if the vaccine is effective for at-risk people is to do a rigorous test like this .
Third , repeat the trial protocol with 100 people who have autoimmune disorders or family histories of autoimmune disorders .
There is no other way to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine on those with a propensity for autoimmune disorders other than a rigorous test of the vaccine , i.e .
sustained exposure to the virus over extended periods of time .
Lastly , monitor all the volunteers daily for six months for any side effects of the vaccine .
It will take years to really know what side effects may manifest , but six months would at least establish a baseline of safety .
The results of these trials would tell us what we absolutely need to know before we blindly inject tens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : 1 .
Will the vaccine offer rock-solid protection against sustained exposure to the virus ?
2 .
Can vaccinated people transmit the virus to unvaccinated people ?
3 .
Will the vaccine protect at-risk people without causing any adverse effects in the most vulnerable groups , including those with autoimmune disorders ?
Let ’ s also be aware of the limits of any vaccine , even one that ’ s 95 % effective .
No vaccine will stop the rapid advance of the virus in the next few months , nor will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from unraveling : U.S. Healthcare Is Unraveling ( November 17 , 2020 ) .
The virus won ’ t stop health care personnel from burning out and becoming too exhausted to go to work .
Nor will it make all the post-Covid symptoms of those who came down with acute Covid go away .
These conditions will demand extended care on an unprecedented scale .
Let ’ s also ponder the potential effects on public trust should the vaccine fail to live up to its advertised effectiveness ( 95 % ) , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come down with severe side-effects , or suffer the misfortune of dying from unknown causes .
Trust in institutions , authorities and Big Pharma is scraping the bottom of the barrel , and rushing these vaccines into mass use with extremely high expectations of efficacy is setting up the potential for a devastating loss of trust in the vaccines should they fail to live up to the claims of 100 % safety and 95 % effectiveness .
95 % effectiveness sounds good , but 5 % of 300 million Americans is still 15 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for side-effects and there ’ s still a roulette wheel spinning that every individual will have to consider .
Behaviors will not time-travel back to 2019 , even with a 95 % effective vaccine .
A great many people will decline the vaccine until they see how the first wave of volunteers fare .
Another consequential number will refuse the vaccine for anyone of numerous reasons .
A third group will put it off because doubts remain : maybe a new vaccine will be even better .
The vaccines are too little , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about their mass effectiveness and eventual side effects , and it ’ s too late to affect the current advance of the virus , the long-term consequences of those with post-Covid conditions or reverse time to the era before behaviors changed .
If you found value in this content , please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $ 1/month patron of my work via patreon.com .

This article was originally published by Charles Hugh Smith at Of Two Minds Blog.
Trust in institutions, authorities, and Big Pharma is scraping the bottom of the barrel, and rushing these vaccines into mass use with extremely high expectations of efficacy is setting up the potential for a devastating loss of trust in the vaccines should they fail to live up to the claims of 100% safety and 95% effectiveness.
We’re being assured by Pfizer and Moderna that their Covid vaccines are 95% effective and are safe enough to be injected into hundreds of millions of people. Before accepting these extremely consequential claims, let’s look at the actual testing process and results.
In the Pfizer trial, half of the 44,000 volunteers received the vaccine and the other half got a placebo shot. Then the researchers waited around to see how many of the volunteers randomly came down with Covid. Pfizer reported that out of 170 cases of Covid, 162 were in the placebo group and eight were in the vaccine group.
So a total of 0.386% of the 44,000 volunteers came down with Covid by means unknown, and this tiny sample is the foundation of grandiose claims of 95% effectiveness? Note the incredibly small sample size. If even 3% of the test group had contracted Covid, the sample size would be 1,320 people–still a small number but considerably more persuasive than 1/3rd of 1% (170).
These results tell us very little about what we really need to know. Allow me to propose a test protocol that would tell us what we need to know.
Take 100 politicians, authorities, and Big Pharma executives, give them two doses of vaccine and then have them serve 4-hour shifts in a crowded ward of severely ill Covid patients for a week, without any masks or protective gear. In other words, expose them to sustained, intimate contact with patients with severe cases of Covid, spending hours every day in a soup of virus.
If 100 people took the measles vaccine, would they hesitate to expose themselves to measles patients? No, because the measles vaccine is close to 100% effective. If the politicians and Big Pharma executives refused to participate in this trial, that would tell us all we really need to know about the effectiveness of their Covid vaccine.
But the trial isn’t finished–not by a long shot. We need to know if the vaccinated people can still transmit the virus to unvaccinated people. So at the end of their shift, the 100 politicians, authorities, and Big Pharma execs clean up and then crowd into a poorly ventilated bar with 100 unvaccinated volunteers, singing, dancing, and breathing the same fetid air for two hours every night.
Next, repeat this trial protocol with another 100 people, 50 of whom have chronic conditions such as hypertension, metabolic disorders, or COPD, and 50 who are 65 years of age or older. The only way we’ll really know if the vaccine is effective for at-risk people is to do a rigorous test like this.
Third, repeat the trial protocol with 100 people who have autoimmune disorders or family histories of autoimmune disorders. There is no other way to discover the potentially harmful consequences of the vaccine on those with a propensity for autoimmune disorders other than a rigorous test of the vaccine, i.e. sustained exposure to the virus over extended periods of time.
Lastly, monitor all the volunteers daily for six months for any side effects of the vaccine. It will take years to really know what side effects may manifest, but six months would at least establish a baseline of safety.
The results of these trials would tell us what we absolutely need to know before we blindly inject tens of millions of people with these vaccines:
1. Will the vaccine offer rock-solid protection against sustained exposure to the virus?
2. Can vaccinated people transmit the virus to unvaccinated people?
3. Will the vaccine protect at-risk people without causing any adverse effects in the most vulnerable groups, including those with autoimmune disorders?
Let’s also be aware of the limits of any vaccine, even one that’s 95% effective. No vaccine will stop the rapid advance of the virus in the next few months, nor will it stop America’s healthcare system from unraveling: U.S. Healthcare Is Unraveling (November 17, 2020).
The virus won’t stop health care personnel from burning out and becoming too exhausted to go to work.
Nor will it make all the post-Covid symptoms of those who came down with acute Covid go away. These conditions will demand extended care on an unprecedented scale.
Let’s also ponder the potential effects on public trust should the vaccine fail to live up to its advertised effectiveness (95%), or some of those who get the vaccine come down with severe side-effects, or suffer the misfortune of dying from unknown causes.
Trust in institutions, authorities and Big Pharma is scraping the bottom of the barrel, and rushing these vaccines into mass use with extremely high expectations of efficacy is setting up the potential for a devastating loss of trust in the vaccines should they fail to live up to the claims of 100% safety and 95% effectiveness.
95% effectiveness sounds good, but 5% of 300 million Americans is still 15 million people. Toss in the potential for side-effects and there’s still a roulette wheel spinning that every individual will have to consider. Behaviors will not time-travel back to 2019, even with a 95% effective vaccine.
A great many people will decline the vaccine until they see how the first wave of volunteers fare. Another consequential number will refuse the vaccine for anyone of numerous reasons. A third group will put it off because doubts remain: maybe a new vaccine will be even better.
The vaccines are too little, too late: too little is known about their mass effectiveness and eventual side effects, and it’s too late to affect the current advance of the virus, the long-term consequences of those with post-Covid conditions or reverse time to the era before behaviors changed.
If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.


shtfplan--2020-11-20--Time Is UP: Pfizer To Seek EUA For COVID-19 Vaccine TODAY

Pfizer and partner BioNTech will seek emergency government approval for their coronavirus vaccine on Friday , Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said , paving the way for millions of doses to be distributed within 24 hours .
The vaccine has allegedly shown a 94.5 % efficacy rate .
Once the Food and Drug Administration gives EUA ( emergency use authorization ) to Pfizer , their vaccine will be rolled out for distribution beginning in 24 hours .
“ We will ship millions of doses of vaccine within 24 hours of FDA approval .
So my message is hope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Aazar said Thursday as he announced the pending emergency use application during a White House coronavirus task force briefing .
For those who think it was “ fake news ” to accurately quote Gus Perna who said : “ Upon emergency use authorization , all of America must receive [ the ] vaccine within 24 hours.
” Apparently , the video of him actually saying this is being ignored and not watched .
He did say it .
Do yourself a favor and listen to him say it .
Here is again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Go to the 25-second mark to hear it .
He didn ’ t say it would be distributed in 24 hours .
He used the word “ receive.
” Take that as you wish and interpret any way you ’ d like .
But he said what he said , and it was not a misquote or “ fake news.
” He also said “ equitable distribution , ” which could also mean they intend to put the vaccine in grocery stores and Wal-Marts next to the flu shots .
None of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is still not going to be well-received even if Perna does mean it will be available within 24 hours for those who want it and not immediately mandatory .
Eventually , hopefully , we all know by now that this will not be a choice .
Richie from Boston made a correction , stating Perna could have meant distribution would happen within 24 hours and not actually receiving the vaccine .
But the fact that Perna said what he said should be concerning regardless of the context .
Vice President Mike Pence said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we could well be a matter of just a few weeks away from a vaccine being available across this country for the most vulnerable among us.
” Azar said , “ there is light at the end of the tunnel , this isn ’ t forever.
” He said a second drugmaker , Moderna , is likely to also seek permission for its vaccine , which was 95 percent effective , and does not require special ultra-cold storage .
“ For the last two weeks , we ’ ve seen just unprecedented historic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each with 95 percent efficacy , rivaling the 98 percent accuracy of our measles vaccine , produced in some of the largest vaccine clinical trials ever conducted in history — over 40,000 patients in each of these clinical trials demonstrating good safety profiles , ” Azar said .
“ BioNTech has announced that tomorrow they intend to file for emergency use authorization at the FDA .
We would expect to see Moderna filing soon also .
We also have this comprehensive distribution plan that… builds on a public-private partnership… with a goal to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ convenient to you as the flu vaccine is.
” Perna said the vaccine doses will be shipped to “ any place that a state wants to administer a vaccine ” and that 100 million kits have been prepared for the vaccines , meaning supplies shortages won ’ t slow the process , according to a report by The New York Post .
“ We can go to one place in a state or we can go to 10,000 places in a state , ” Perna said .
Choices will have to be made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alert .
Use your discernment and take quotes from these vaccine officials how you think they are intended .
I don ’ t pretend to know what he could have meant .
But I took his statement to mean that he intends to vaccinate the whole of America .
Admittedly , there is no logistical way to do that in a 24-hour window , but nonetheless , he said what he said .

Pfizer and partner BioNTech will seek emergency government approval for their coronavirus vaccine on Friday, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said, paving the way for millions of doses to be distributed within 24 hours. The vaccine has allegedly shown a 94.5% efficacy rate.
Once the Food and Drug Administration gives EUA (emergency use authorization) to Pfizer, their vaccine will be rolled out for distribution beginning in 24 hours. “We will ship millions of doses of vaccine within 24 hours of FDA approval. So my message is hope and help are on the way,” Aazar said Thursday as he announced the pending emergency use application during a White House coronavirus task force briefing.
For those who think it was “fake news” to accurately quote Gus Perna who said: “Upon emergency use authorization, all of America must receive [the] vaccine within 24 hours.” Apparently, the video of him actually saying this is being ignored and not watched. He did say it. Do yourself a favor and listen to him say it. Here is again, less than one minute in. Go to the 25-second mark to hear it.
He didn’t say it would be distributed in 24 hours. He used the word “receive.” Take that as you wish and interpret any way you’d like. But he said what he said, and it was not a misquote or “fake news.”
He also said “equitable distribution,” which could also mean they intend to put the vaccine in grocery stores and Wal-Marts next to the flu shots. None of this is “good.” This rushed vaccine is still not going to be well-received even if Perna does mean it will be available within 24 hours for those who want it and not immediately mandatory.
Trump: “The Military Is Ready To Deliver A Vaccine”
Eventually, hopefully, we all know by now that this will not be a choice. Richie from Boston made a correction, stating Perna could have meant distribution would happen within 24 hours and not actually receiving the vaccine. But the fact that Perna said what he said should be concerning regardless of the context.

Vice President Mike Pence said at the briefing that “literally, we could well be a matter of just a few weeks away from a vaccine being available across this country for the most vulnerable among us.”
Azar said, “there is light at the end of the tunnel, this isn’t forever.” He said a second drugmaker, Moderna, is likely to also seek permission for its vaccine, which was 95 percent effective, and does not require special ultra-cold storage. “For the last two weeks, we’ve seen just unprecedented historic news about vaccines. Two vaccines, each with 95 percent efficacy, rivaling the 98 percent accuracy of our measles vaccine, produced in some of the largest vaccine clinical trials ever conducted in history — over 40,000 patients in each of these clinical trials demonstrating good safety profiles,” Azar said.
“BioNTech has announced that tomorrow they intend to file for emergency use authorization at the FDA. We would expect to see Moderna filing soon also. We also have this comprehensive distribution plan that… builds on a public-private partnership… with a goal to make the distribution of this vaccine as convenient to you as the flu vaccine is.”
Perna said the vaccine doses will be shipped to “any place that a state wants to administer a vaccine” and that 100 million kits have been prepared for the vaccines, meaning supplies shortages won’t slow the process, according to a report by The New York Post. “We can go to one place in a state or we can go to 10,000 places in a state,” Perna said.
Choices will have to be made soon. Be prepared. And stay alert. Use your discernment and take quotes from these vaccine officials how you think they are intended. I don’t pretend to know what he could have meant. But I took his statement to mean that he intends to vaccinate the whole of America. Admittedly, there is no logistical way to do that in a 24-hour window, but nonetheless, he said what he said.


shtfplan--2020-11-21--Coffee Is For Closers

Coffee Is For Closers

Michael Snyder November 21st , 2020 The End Of The American Dream This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The End of the American Dream .
It is put up or shut up time .
More than two weeks have passed since November 3rd , and the Trump legal team only has a very limited amount of time left to stop Joe Biden from being elected president .
The Electoral College votes on December 14th , but the real deadline is December 8th because the selection of electors must be completed by that date .
Of course , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court could push back that deadline , but it has never happened before in all of U.S. history .
So basically the Trump legal team has only between now and December 8th to pull off a colossal legal miracle , and so far their record in lawsuits around the country is 1 win and 30 losses .
Needless to say , that is not good .
But there is a huge difference between what you can prove and what you can prove in court .
That is why whoever has the better lawyer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the evidence is .
Often , a superior lawyer can find a path to victory even when seemingly everything is against him .
Over the past couple of weeks , Trump ’ s lawyers have told us in an interview after the interview that they have more than enough evidence to overturn the election results .
But so far they have not done it .
Yes , I believe that they have more than enough evidence to get the job done , but so far they haven ’ t gotten the job done @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week is Thanksgiving , and so very little is likely to happen in the courts the entire week .
The Monday after Thanksgiving is November 30th , and then we will be into early December .
Even if Trump had the best legal team in the world , time would be working against them in a major way .
To be honest , I don ’ t have a lot of confidence in Rudy Giuliani at this point .
He has faltered badly in the courtroom and in front of the cameras .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sidney Powell , but I am not sure that she is pursuing the right strategy .
When she was being interviewed by Lou Dobbs , she stated that suits will be brought against election officials in the key swing states in order to invalidate the results of their elections… I think that this is a strategic mistake .
If this path ends up being successful , I will apologize and admit that I was wrong .
But I don ’ t think that I am .
Personally , I believe that the correct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the evidence of widespread vote manipulation by Dominion Voting Systems in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as quickly as possible .
If Trump is going to end up winning this thing , the Supreme Court is going to have to get involved .
What is at stake is so much more than just this election .
If they get away with stealing this election and Trump ’ s legal challenges completely fail , that will just embolden them to be even more brazen in the future .
Some Trump supporters have suggested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2024 , but what would stop them from stealing that election too ?
At least for the moment Trump still has the power of the White House behind him .
In 2024 , Trump would only have his own personal resources to use to try to stop a steal from happening .
And needless to say , any prominent Trump allies or supporters that attempted to run for other offices would also likely be targets for election theft .
The other side is not playing games .
During a recent Twitter thread , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voted for Trump should be sent to “ re-education camps ” … And another user thought that completely banning Trump flags would be a great idea… But as chilling as those suggestions were , they were all topped by the user that said that firing squads are the answer .
There are lots of people out there that think this way , and I have repeatedly warned that in the years ahead great persecution is coming .
Under a Biden administration , things would be tough for conservatives , but once Kamala Harris @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this country would become extremely unpleasant very rapidly .
For the moment , there is still hope that Trump will emerge victoriously , but every day that slips away is a major victory for Biden .
So if Trump ’ s lawyers are going to make a major move , they need to do it now .
Coffee is for closers , and if Trump ’ s lawyers are able to pull a miracle out of a hat they will be regarded as legends for the rest of their lives .
But if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big , their reputations will be ruined permanently .
They have so much at stake , and the nation as a whole has so much at stake .
No matter who ends up winning this particular election , we owe it to future generations of Americans to figure out what in the world just happened .
There are so many questions about the voting results that are still unresolved , and all Americans should be deeply concerned that the integrity of our elections appears to have been compromised .
***Michael ’ s new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Future Of America ” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon .
*** About the Author : My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “ Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America ” is now available on Amazon.com .
In addition to my new book , I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End , Get Prepared Now , and Living A Life That Really Matters .
( # CommissionsEarned ) By purchasing the books you help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and I are doing , and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe .
I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog , End Of The American Dream , and The Most Important News , and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe .
I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites , but I also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Author ” section with each article .
The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only , and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal , business , financial , or health decisions .
I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook , Twitter , and Parler , and anyway that you can share these articles with others is a great help .
During these very challenging times , people will need hope more than ever before , and it is our goal to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as many people as we possibly can .

This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The End of the American Dream.
It is put up or shut up time. More than two weeks have passed since November 3rd, and the Trump legal team only has a very limited amount of time left to stop Joe Biden from being elected president. The Electoral College votes on December 14th, but the real deadline is December 8th because the selection of electors must be completed by that date.
Of course, it is possible that the U.S. Supreme Court could push back that deadline, but it has never happened before in all of U.S. history. So basically the Trump legal team has only between now and December 8th to pull off a colossal legal miracle, and so far their record in lawsuits around the country is 1 win and 30 losses. Needless to say, that is not good.
Personally, I am absolutely convinced that vote totals were manipulated electronically all over the nation. Election data from the New York Times is publicly available for anyone that wants to dig into it, and it appears that votes were being systematically switched from Trump to Biden in many states. One expert has posted his state by state analysis Personally, I am absolutely convinced that vote totals were manipulated electronically all over the nation. Election data from the New York Times is publicly available for anyone that wants to dig into it, and it appears that votes were being systematically switched from Trump to Biden in many states. One expert has posted his state by state analysis right here
But there is a huge difference between what you can prove and what you can prove in court. That is why whoever has the better lawyer usually wins in court no matter what the evidence is. Often, a superior lawyer can find a path to victory even when seemingly everything is against him.
Over the past couple of weeks, Trump’s lawyers have told us in an interview after the interview that they have more than enough evidence to overturn the election results.
But so far they have not done it.
As Yoda once said…
“Do or do not. There is no try.”
Yes, I believe that they have more than enough evidence to get the job done, but so far they haven’t gotten the job done and time is running out.
Next week is Thanksgiving, and so very little is likely to happen in the courts the entire week.
The Monday after Thanksgiving is November 30th, and then we will be into early December.
Even if Trump had the best legal team in the world, time would be working against them in a major way.
To be honest, I don’t have a lot of confidence in Rudy Giuliani at this point. He has faltered badly in the courtroom and in front of the cameras.
I have a lot more confidence in Sidney Powell, but I am not sure that she is pursuing the right strategy. When she was being interviewed by Lou Dobbs, she stated that suits will be brought against election officials in the key swing states in order to invalidate the results of their elections…
Dobbs also asked if Trump’s llegal team will pursue legal action against Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic: “Are you pressing forward with legal action against them for those violations?” Dobbs asked. “Not against the company and the software,” Powell responded. “But the suits will be against the election officials to invalidate the results of the election and force it to the legislatures and the Electoral College and then the Congress if necessary.”
I think that this is a strategic mistake. If this path ends up being successful, I will apologize and admit that I was wrong.
But I don’t think that I am.
Personally, I believe that the correct course of action would be to get the evidence of widespread vote manipulation by Dominion Voting Systems in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as quickly as possible. If Trump is going to end up winning this thing, the Supreme Court is going to have to get involved.
What is at stake is so much more than just this election. If they get away with stealing this election and Trump’s legal challenges completely fail, that will just embolden them to be even more brazen in the future.
Some Trump supporters have suggested that Trump could just run again in 2024, but what would stop them from stealing that election too?
At least for the moment Trump still has the power of the White House behind him. In 2024, Trump would only have his own personal resources to use to try to stop a steal from happening.
And needless to say, any prominent Trump allies or supporters that attempted to run for other offices would also likely be targets for election theft.
The other side is not playing games. During a recent Twitter thread, some leftists actually suggested that those that voted for Trump should be sent to “re-education camps”…
Leftists responded to a Twitter thread asking “how do you deprogram 75 million people?” by suggesting Trump supporters should be interned in “re-education camps” and that all conservative talk radio should be banned.
And another user thought that completely banning Trump flags would be a great idea…
Start by banning trump flags like we should have done with the confederate flag. One of our many mistakes and why we failed at Reconstruction. We should not allow a hate symbol to be flown with pride in our democracy.
But as chilling as those suggestions were, they were all topped by the user that said that firing squads are the answer.
There are lots of people out there that think this way, and I have repeatedly warned that in the years ahead great persecution is coming.
Under a Biden administration, things would be tough for conservatives, but once Kamala Harris took over the environment for conservatives in this country would become extremely unpleasant very rapidly.
For the moment, there is still hope that Trump will emerge victoriously, but every day that slips away is a major victory for Biden.
So if Trump’s lawyers are going to make a major move, they need to do it now.
Coffee is for closers, and if Trump’s lawyers are able to pull a miracle out of a hat they will be regarded as legends for the rest of their lives.
But if they are not successful after talking so big, their reputations will be ruined permanently.
They have so much at stake, and the nation as a whole has so much at stake.
No matter who ends up winning this particular election, we owe it to future generations of Americans to figure out what in the world just happened.
There are so many questions about the voting results that are still unresolved, and all Americans should be deeply concerned that the integrity of our elections appears to have been compromised.
***Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.***
About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on Amazon.com. In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End, Get Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned) By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe. I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dream, and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe. I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article. The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial, or health decisions. I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook, Twitter, and Parler, and anyway that you can share these articles with others is a great help. During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.


shtfplan--2020-11-22--What Is “The Great Reset”?

What Is “The Great Reset”?

This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog .
The Internet sure has been buzzing about “ the Great Reset ” lately .
That term has been trending on Facebook and Twitter , and the New York Times even published an article dismissing it as a “ conspiracy theory ” .
But it is definitely no conspiracy theory .
I was determined to get to the bottom of this whole thing , and I am going to share the facts that the New York Times either could not find or refused to share .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” is actually an initiative that was started by the World Economic Forum that is designed to get “ global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis ” .
The following comes directly from the official website of the World Economic Forum… So the New York Times put out fake news when they told all of us that “ the Great Reset ” is just a “ conspiracy theory ” , and they owe all of us a major apology .
According to the World Economic Forum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a “ unique window of opportunity ” for global leaders to shape “ the future state of global relations , the direction of national economies , the priorities of societies , the nature of business models and the management of a global commons ” … In other words , “ the Great Reset ” is essentially just an updated blueprint for a New World Order .
The man behind “ the Great Reset ” is named Klaus Schwab .
He is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WEF there is an article by Schwab entitled “ Now is the time for a ‘ great reset ’ ” .
The following is an excerpt from that article… He is very open about the fact that he wants to “ revamp all aspects of our societies and economies ” .
That means that all aspects of human activity would fall under his plan .
But in particular , he very much wants a “ Great Reset ” of capitalism .
That definitely sets off alarm bells .
When people start talking about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they mean is that we should move even more in the direction of socialism .
According to Schwab , there are three main components to “ the Great Reset ” .
The first involves reforming our economic systems so that they will “ promote more equitable outcomes ” … Unfortunately , I think that he means the exact same thing that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez means when she talks about “ more equitable outcomes ” .
Secondly , Schwab says that one of the main components of “ the Great Reset ” would involve massive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infrastructure and other similar projects… The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals , such as equality and sustainability .
Here , the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress .
The European Commission , for one , has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ( $ 826 billion ) recovery fund .
The US , China , and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans .
Rather than using these funds , as well as investments from private entities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the old system , we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient , equitable , and sustainable in the long run .
This means , for example , building “ green ” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental , social , and governance ( ESG ) metrics .
Doesn ’ t that sound a whole lot like the “ Green New Deal ” that many on the left have been pushing here in the United States ?
Thirdly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we have witnessed during the COVID pandemic as a model for “ every sector ” of society… In other words , Schwab thinks that the global response to the COVID pandemic can be a blueprint for governing every area of our lives moving forward .
Of course in order for the globalists to get the United States on board with this “ Great Reset ” , they will need to get Donald Trump out of the way first , and they think that they are very close to achieving that goal .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ future in which all forms of human activity are very closely monitored and controlled for “ the good of the planet ” .
They are entirely convinced that a global system in which all the nations of the world are increasingly integrated is what is best for humanity , but those of us that are resisting the globalists understand that a one world system will inevitably evolve into a complete and utter global nightmare .
Globalist publications such as the New York Times will continue to try to convince all of us that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” do not even exist , even as globalist organizations such as the World Economic Forum are publicly announcing their plans right out in the open .
In times like these , it is absolutely imperative to think for yourself , because deception is everywhere and those that tell the truth are often greatly ridiculed .
***Michael ’ s new book entitled “ Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America ” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon .
*** About the Author : My name is Michael Snyder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America ” is now available on Amazon.com .
In addition to my new book , I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End , Get Prepared Now , and Living A Life That Really Matters .
( # CommissionsEarned ) By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing , and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ articles on The Economic Collapse Blog , End Of The American Dream , and The Most Important News , and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe .
I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites , but I also ask that they include this “ About the Author ” section with each article .
The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only , and readers should consult licensed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , financial , or health decisions .
I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook , Twitter , and Parler , and anyway that you can share these articles with others is a great help .
During these very challenging times , people will need hope more than ever before , and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can .

This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog.
The Internet sure has been buzzing about “the Great Reset” lately. That term has been trending on Facebook and Twitter, and the New York Times even published an article dismissing it as a “conspiracy theory”. But it is definitely no conspiracy theory.
I was determined to get to the bottom of this whole thing, and I am going to share the facts that the New York Times either could not find or refused to share. It turns out that “the Great Reset” is actually an initiative that was started by the World Economic Forum that is designed to get “global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis”. The following comes directly from the official website of the World Economic Forum…
There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.
So the New York Times put out fake news when they told all of us that “the Great Reset” is just a “conspiracy theory”, and they owe all of us a major apology.
According to the World Economic Forum, “the Great Reset” is a “unique window of opportunity” for global leaders to shape “the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons”…
As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons. Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities, the Great Reset initiative has a set of dimensions to build a new social contract that honours the dignity of every human being.
In other words, “the Great Reset” is essentially just an updated blueprint for a New World Order.
The man behind “the Great Reset” is named Klaus Schwab. He is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, and elsewhere on the official site of the WEF there is an article by Schwab entitled “Now is the time for a ‘great reset’”. The following is an excerpt from that article…
To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
He is very open about the fact that he wants to “revamp all aspects of our societies and economies”. That means that all aspects of human activity would fall under his plan.
But in particular, he very much wants a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
That definitely sets off alarm bells. When people start talking about dramatic changes to capitalism, usually what they mean is that we should move even more in the direction of socialism.
According to Schwab, there are three main components to “the Great Reset”. The first involves reforming our economic systems so that they will “promote more equitable outcomes”…
Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.
Unfortunately, I think that he means the exact same thing that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez means when she talks about “more equitable outcomes”.
Secondly, Schwab says that one of the main components of “the Great Reset” would involve massive government investments in “green” urban infrastructure and other similar projects…
The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability. Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ($826 billion) recovery fund. The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans. Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.
Doesn’t that sound a whole lot like the “Green New Deal” that many on the left have been pushing here in the United States?
Thirdly, Schwab envisions applying the “innovations” that we have witnessed during the COVID pandemic as a model for “every sector” of society…
The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges. During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centers; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.
In other words, Schwab thinks that the global response to the COVID pandemic can be a blueprint for governing every area of our lives moving forward.
Doesn’t that sound just wonderful?
Of course in order for the globalists to get the United States on board with this “Great Reset”, they will need to get Donald Trump out of the way first, and they think that they are very close to achieving that goal.
The globalists envision a “sustainable” future in which all forms of human activity are very closely monitored and controlled for “the good of the planet”. They are entirely convinced that a global system in which all the nations of the world are increasingly integrated is what is best for humanity, but those of us that are resisting the globalists understand that a one world system will inevitably evolve into a complete and utter global nightmare.
Globalist publications such as the New York Times will continue to try to convince all of us that plans such as “the Great Reset” do not even exist, even as globalist organizations such as the World Economic Forum are publicly announcing their plans right out in the open.
In times like these, it is absolutely imperative to think for yourself, because deception is everywhere and those that tell the truth are often greatly ridiculed.
***Michael’s new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.***
About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America” is now available on Amazon.com. In addition to my new book, I have written four others that are available on Amazon.com including The Beginning Of The End, Get Prepared Now, and Living A Life That Really Matters. (#CommissionsEarned) By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe. I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dream, and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe. I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article. The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial, or health decisions. I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook, Twitter, and Parler, and anyway that you can share these articles with others is a great help. During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.


shtfplan--2020-11-23--HELL UNLEASHED: CATALYSTS FOR MARKET MELTDOWN!

This article was contributed by The Wealth Research Group .
Today ’ s letter encapsulates our overview of how markets may react to the all-important news flow , which is coming our way , and what might happen in December .
We ’ ve gone over this from all angles and my main conclusion is this : risk of a correction is high , but the potential for a boom is high as well .
In other words , we don ’ t expect sideways action in December whatsoever ; it will either be that December is a spectacular month @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The best way to win in this type of set up , as we see it , is to take profits of value stocks in advance .
The thesis behind it is this : if markets crash , the large cash position will allow re-entering into growth and value at much lower prices .
If the market explodes , having that allocation towards growth , going into it , will allow for big gains without risking too much cash .
These catalysts are going to drive markets in December : • Black Friday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the end of the day , America is a shopping machine .
70 % of its GDP comes from getting its massive population base of 330M individuals to spend money and create velocity of currency .
America thrives on consumer confidence , so these two holidays will tell us not only ( 1 ) who is shopping { the blue-collar worker or the white-collar worker or BOTH ) but also ( 2 ) how strong they are or how badly they need a bailout .
Our data shows that people have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will not deprive themselves of some holiday cheer .
We expect online sales to be strong , but we don ’ t believe that it will originate from the lower-income brackets , which are in desperate shape right now !
They ’ re looking to stay in their homes and not get evicted ; they ’ re looking to put food on the table rather than wear the latest fashion .
This data will be out by December 1st , which is the reason I outlined it first .
• Secondly , on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is set to approve both Pfizer and Moderna ’ s mRNA vaccines .
If you ’ ve been watching the press conferences held by the White House Covid-19 taskforce , then you know that the administration is doing all it can to convince the general public to trust that the vaccines are safe and hold no adverse side effects .
This mass-marketing effort to prove that they weren ’ t rushed , at the expense of going through the proper procedure to eliminate any risks of taking them , comes because a majority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , people around the globe – are not too excited about injecting themselves with yet another vaccine , when 99 % of Covid-19 patients recover from the disease without any lasting harm .
We know we are going to be researching this thoroughly as well .
Vaccines have become a polarizing topic , with Bill Gates portrayed as the antichrist leading the charge to inject/infect the population ; many doctors , on the other hand , are deconstructing this theory by attempting to prove that there are no clear links between vaccines and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Our point is not to take sides , but to tell you that , according to the White House , there are 100M doses ready to be deployed within 24hrs of approval and that public acceptance or resentment will move markets .
• Another big catalyst comes on December 11th , when Congress must pass the budget for 2021 in order to avoid a shutdown .
A fiscal cliff adds to the ever-growing division in politics and we don ’ t believe we ’ ll get there , since Democrats and Republicans are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Omnibus Spending Bill , which is likely to bundle up a number of various spending programs into one .
With JPMorgan releasing data , which shows that they believe that Q1 2021 will see GDP contracting again , our thesis remains that the full recovery will happen in 2022 .
NOTHING is over yet .

This article was contributed by The Wealth Research Group.
Today’s letter encapsulates our overview of how markets may react to the all-important news flow, which is coming our way, and what might happen in December. We’ve gone over this from all angles and my main conclusion is this: risk of a correction is high, but the potential for a boom is high as well.
In other words, we don’t expect sideways action in December whatsoever; it will either be that December is a spectacular month or that a huge sell-off occurs. The best way to win in this type of set up, as we see it, is to take profits of value stocks in advance.
The thesis behind it is this: if markets crash, the large cash position will allow re-entering into growth and value at much lower prices. If the market explodes, having that allocation towards growth, going into it, will allow for big gains without risking too much cash.
These catalysts are going to drive markets in December:
Black Friday / Cyber Monday sales: Remember, at the end of the day, America is a shopping machine. 70% of its GDP comes from getting its massive population base of 330M individuals to spend money and create velocity of currency. America thrives on consumer confidence, so these two holidays will tell us not only (1) who is shopping {the blue-collar worker or the white-collar worker or BOTH) but also (2) how strong they are or how badly they need a bailout.
Our data shows that people have been getting sick and tired of 2020 and will not deprive themselves of some holiday cheer. We expect online sales to be strong, but we don’t believe that it will originate from the lower-income brackets, which are in desperate shape right now! They’re looking to stay in their homes and not get evicted; they’re looking to put food on the table rather than wear the latest fashion. This data will be out by December 1st, which is the reason I outlined it first.
Secondly, on December 8th and 9th, the FDA is set to approve both Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines. If you’ve been watching the press conferences held by the White House Covid-19 taskforce, then you know that the administration is doing all it can to convince the general public to trust that the vaccines are safe and hold no adverse side effects.
This mass-marketing effort to prove that they weren’t rushed, at the expense of going through the proper procedure to eliminate any risks of taking them, comes because a majority of Americans – and for that matter, people around the globe – are not too excited about injecting themselves with yet another vaccine, when 99% of Covid-19 patients recover from the disease without any lasting harm. We know we are going to be researching this thoroughly as well.
Vaccines have become a polarizing topic, with Bill Gates portrayed as the antichrist leading the charge to inject/infect the population; many doctors, on the other hand, are deconstructing this theory by attempting to prove that there are no clear links between vaccines and autism in children, for example.
Our point is not to take sides, but to tell you that, according to the White House, there are 100M doses ready to be deployed within 24hrs of approval and that public acceptance or resentment will move markets.
Another big catalyst comes on December 11th, when Congress must pass the budget for 2021 in order to avoid a shutdown.
A fiscal cliff adds to the ever-growing division in politics and we don’t believe we’ll get there, since Democrats and Republicans are working on what’s called the Omnibus Spending Bill, which is likely to bundle up a number of various spending programs into one.
With JPMorgan releasing data, which shows that they believe that Q1 2021 will see GDP contracting again, our thesis remains that the full recovery will happen in 2022.