lewrockwell--2020-12-21--The Greatest Gift For All

The Greatest Gift For All

The decorations and gifts of Christmas are one of our connections to a Christian culture that has held Western civilization together for 2,000 years .
In our culture the individual counts .
This permits an individual person to put his or her foot down , to take a stand on principle , to become a reformer and to take on injustice .
This empowerment of the individual is unique to Western civilization .
It has made the individual a citizen equal in rights to all other citizens , protected from tyrannical government by the rule of law and free speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ centuries of struggle , but they all flow from the teaching that God so values the individual ’ s soul that he sent his son to die so we might live .
By so elevating the individual , Christianity gave him a voice .
Formerly only those with power had a voice .
But in Western civilization people with integrity have a voice .
So do people with a sense of justice , of honor , of duty , of fair play .
Reformers can reform , investors can invest , and entrepreneurs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and new occupations .
Cozy Brett , Jan Best Price : $ 13.23 Buy New $ 13.73 The result was a land of opportunity .
The United States attracted immigrants who shared our values and reflected them in their own lives .
Our culture was absorbed by a diverse people who became one .
In recent decades we have lost sight of the historic achievement that empowered the individual .
The religious , legal and political roots of this great achievement are no longer reverently taught in high schools , colleges and universities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voices that reach us through the millennia and connect us to our culture are being silenced by “ Identity Politics , ” “ political correctness ” and the war against “ white culture.
” Prayer has been driven from schools and Christian religious symbols from public life .
As Christian tradition fades as the basis of behavior , barbarity will gather more strength and reign over us .
Christianity is being gradually marginalized .
Each year it becomes more difficult to find a Christmas card that says “ Merry Christmas ” instead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Christmas carols we get Hollywood Christmas songs .
In some churches Christianity is being transmuted into Christian Zionism and the worship of Israel .
Others fly LGBTQ and BLM flags .
We are approaching a time when a Christian Christmas can not be celebrated as it is not inclusive in a diverse society and therefore is politically incorrect if not a hate crime .
Constitutional protections have been diminished by hegemonic political ambitions .
Indefinite detention , torture , and murder are now acknowledged practices of the United States government .
The historic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back .
Tyranny has re-emerged .
Wild Symphony Brown , Dan Best Price : $ 8.63 Buy New $ 9.29 Diversity at home and hegemony abroad are consuming values and are dismantling the culture and the rule of law .
There is plenty of room for cultural diversity in the world , but not within a single country .
A Tower of Babel has no culture .
A person can not be a Christian one day , a pagan the next and a Muslim the day after .
A hodgepodge of cultural and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – except the raw power of the pre-Christian past .
All Americans have a huge stake in Christianity .
Whether or not we are individually believers in Christ , we are beneficiaries of the moral doctrine that has curbed power and protected the weak .
Power is the horse ridden by evil .
In the 20th century the horse was ridden hard , and the 21st century shows an increase in pace .
Millions of people were exterminated in the 20th century by wars that served the ambitions of political leaders and ideological @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they were members of a class or race that had been demonized by intellectuals and political authority .
In the beginning years of the 21st century , hundreds of thousands of Muslims in seven countries have been murdered and millions displaced in order to serve the neoconservatives ’ agenda of extending Washington and Israel ’ s hegemony .
Power that is secularized and cut free of civilizing traditions is not limited by moral and religious scruples .
V.I .
Lenin made this clear when he defined the meaning of his dictatorship as “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not limited by anything.
” Washington ’ s drive for hegemony over US citizens and the rest of the world is based entirely on the exercise of force and is resurrecting unaccountable power .
Christianity ’ s emphasis on the worth of the individual makes such power as Lenin claimed , and Washington now claims , unthinkable .
Be we religious or be we not , our celebration of Christ ’ s birthday celebrates a religion that made us masters of our souls and of our political life on Earth .
Such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on to even by atheists .
As we enter into 2021 , Western civilization , the product of thousands of years of striving , is in decline .
Degeneracy is everywhere before our eyes .
As the West sinks into tyranny and degeneracy , will Western peoples defend their liberty and their souls , or will they sink into the tyranny , which again has raised its ugly and all devouring head ?
The Best of Paul Craig Roberts

The decorations and gifts of Christmas are one of our connections to a Christian culture that has held Western civilization together for 2,000 years.
In our culture the individual counts. This permits an individual person to put his or her foot down, to take a stand on principle, to become a reformer and to take on injustice.
This empowerment of the individual is unique to Western civilization. It has made the individual a citizen equal in rights to all other citizens, protected from tyrannical government by the rule of law and free speech. These achievements are the products of centuries of struggle, but they all flow from the teaching that God so values the individual’s soul that he sent his son to die so we might live. By so elevating the individual, Christianity gave him a voice.
Formerly only those with power had a voice. But in Western civilization people with integrity have a voice. So do people with a sense of justice, of honor, of duty, of fair play. Reformers can reform, investors can invest, and entrepreneurs can create commercial enterprises, new products and new occupations. Cozy Brett, Jan Best Price: $13.23 Buy New $13.73 (as of 07:11 UTC - Details)
The result was a land of opportunity. The United States attracted immigrants who shared our values and reflected them in their own lives. Our culture was absorbed by a diverse people who became one.
In recent decades we have lost sight of the historic achievement that empowered the individual. The religious, legal and political roots of this great achievement are no longer reverently taught in high schools, colleges and universities or respected by our government. The voices that reach us through the millennia and connect us to our culture are being silenced by “Identity Politics,” “political correctness” and the war against “white culture.” Prayer has been driven from schools and Christian religious symbols from public life. As Christian tradition fades as the basis of behavior, barbarity will gather more strength and reign over us.
Christianity is being gradually marginalized. Each year it becomes more difficult to find a Christmas card that says “Merry Christmas” instead of “Seasons Greetings.” In place of Christmas carols we get Hollywood Christmas songs. In some churches Christianity is being transmuted into Christian Zionism and the worship of Israel. Others fly LGBTQ and BLM flags. We are approaching a time when a Christian Christmas cannot be celebrated as it is not inclusive in a diverse society and therefore is politically incorrect if not a hate crime.
Constitutional protections have been diminished by hegemonic political ambitions. Indefinite detention, torture, and murder are now acknowledged practices of the United States government. The historic achievement of due process has been rolled back. Tyranny has re-emerged.
Wild Symphony Brown, Dan Best Price: $8.63 Buy New $9.29 (as of 07:11 UTC - Details) Diversity at home and hegemony abroad are consuming values and are dismantling the culture and the rule of law. There is plenty of room for cultural diversity in the world, but not within a single country. A Tower of Babel has no culture. A person cannot be a Christian one day, a pagan the next and a Muslim the day after. A hodgepodge of cultural and religious values provides no basis for law – except the raw power of the pre-Christian past.
All Americans have a huge stake in Christianity. Whether or not we are individually believers in Christ, we are beneficiaries of the moral doctrine that has curbed power and protected the weak.
Power is the horse ridden by evil. In the 20th century the horse was ridden hard, and the 21st century shows an increase in pace. Millions of people were exterminated in the 20th century by wars that served the ambitions of political leaders and ideological movements. Many were murdered simply because they were members of a class or race that had been demonized by intellectuals and political authority. In the beginning years of the 21st century, hundreds of thousands of Muslims in seven countries have been murdered and millions displaced in order to serve the neoconservatives’ agenda of extending Washington and Israel’s hegemony.
Power that is secularized and cut free of civilizing traditions is not limited by moral and religious scruples. V.I. Lenin made this clear when he defined the meaning of his dictatorship as “unlimited power, resting directly on force, not limited by anything.” Washington’s drive for hegemony over US citizens and the rest of the world is based entirely on the exercise of force and is resurrecting unaccountable power.
Christianity’s emphasis on the worth of the individual makes such power as Lenin claimed, and Washington now claims, unthinkable. Be we religious or be we not, our celebration of Christ’s birthday celebrates a religion that made us masters of our souls and of our political life on Earth. Such a religion as this is worth holding on to even by atheists.
As we enter into 2021, Western civilization, the product of thousands of years of striving, is in decline. Degeneracy is everywhere before our eyes. As the West sinks into tyranny and degeneracy, will Western peoples defend their liberty and their souls, or will they sink into the tyranny, which again has raised its ugly and all devouring head?
The Best of Paul Craig Roberts


lewrockwell--2020-12-21--How Belarus Exposes the Lockdown Lie

How Belarus Exposes the Lockdown Lie

Most European governments instituted the shutdown of economies , restrictions on freedom of movement and other policies known as lockdown .
This was allegedly in response to the spread of Sars-Cov-2 , a dangerous respiratory virus that originated in Wuhan , China .
Few countries rejected this approach ; Sweden is the most well known of these .
However , a more interesting case of dissent from the official narrative is Belarus and its leader Aleksandr Lukashenka .
This article will outline Lukashenka ’ s approach to the alleged pandemic , followed by an analysis of death figures and how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdown advocates .
The alleged pandemic broke out in Europe in March 2020 , and most European governments followed the severe strategy of imposing lockdowns .
Lukashenka ’ s response was much more limited .
A Belarussian press release from the 25th March talks about the quarantines set up for people who enter Belarus : There ’ s a Murder ... Delany , Vicki Best Price : $ 4.95 Buy New $ 6.12 Quarantine stations were set up at all the points of entry .
Screening measures include temperature checks .
This system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minister ] Vladimir Karanik noted .
This helped identify symptoms of a viral infection in more than 250 people , however the absolute majority of them had influenza , parainfluenza , and adenovirus .
If a person tests positive for coronavirus , healthcare workers put their contacts under medical observation .
“ Such a targeted approach helps curb the spread of the virus , ” the minister said.
” Lukashenka also advocated staying at home if one has symptoms of the virus .
He also famously made some comments – reported widely in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : I am teetotal , but in recent times I say jokingly , that it is necessary to not only wash hands with vodka , but probably that [ consuming ] 40-50 grams of a measure of clean spirit a day – [ can ] “ poison ” [ in commas in original text ] this virus .
But not at work.
” He then says that “ Today , go to the sauna .
But if [ you go ] two-three times a week that is even healthier .
The Chinese have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ withstand temperatures of 60 degrees ” .
The Green Mill Murder ... Greenwood , Kerry Best Price : $ 15.95 Buy New $ 11.57 Overall , the Belarussian approach has been the least authoritarian in Europe .
Belarussian football went ahead as normal and fans were allowed to continue attending games .
Theatres , cafes and other social events continued and there was no shutdown of the economy .
Victory Day Parades also went ahead on the 9th May despite being cancelled in countries such as Russia .
Neither did Lukashenka delay scheduled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zealand .
Western media treated Lukashenka ’ s approach as a laughable curiosity ( in cases where they did not ignore it entirely ) .
They mocked Lukashenka ’ s comments about vodka and saunas , using this was a way to avoid asking any deeper questions .
According to the official narrative , Belarus should have been a zone of death , destruction and disaster .
Neil Ferguson ’ s modelling – one of the key pieces of propaganda used to put Britain in lockdown – predicted that left unchecked Covid 19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So what are the facts ?

Most European governments instituted the shutdown of economies, restrictions on freedom of movement and other policies known as lockdown. This was allegedly in response to the spread of Sars-Cov-2, a dangerous respiratory virus that originated in Wuhan, China.
Few countries rejected this approach; Sweden is the most well known of these. However, a more interesting case of dissent from the official narrative is Belarus and its leader Aleksandr Lukashenka.
This article will outline Lukashenka’s approach to the alleged pandemic, followed by an analysis of death figures and how the Belarussian case exposes the lies of lockdown advocates.
THE BELARUSSIAN APPROACH TO COVID 19
The alleged pandemic broke out in Europe in March 2020, and most European governments followed the severe strategy of imposing lockdowns. Lukashenka’s response was much more limited. A Belarussian press release from the 25th March talks about the quarantines set up for people who enter Belarus: There’s a Murder... Delany, Vicki Best Price: $4.95 Buy New $6.12 (as of 07:12 UTC - Details)
Quarantine stations were set up at all the points of entry. Screening measures include temperature checks. This system of control really works, [healthcare minister] Vladimir Karanik noted. This helped identify symptoms of a viral infection in more than 250 people, however the absolute majority of them had influenza, parainfluenza, and adenovirus. If a person tests positive for coronavirus, healthcare workers put their contacts under medical observation. “Such a targeted approach helps curb the spread of the virus,” the minister said.”
Lukashenka also advocated staying at home if one has symptoms of the virus. He also famously made some comments – reported widely in the Western media – giving health advice:
I am teetotal, but in recent times I say jokingly, that it is necessary to not only wash hands with vodka, but probably that [consuming] 40-50 grams of a measure of clean spirit a day – [can] “poison” [in commas in original text] this virus. But not at work.” He then says that “Today, go to the sauna. But if [you go] two-three times a week that is even healthier. The Chinese have told us that this virus cannot withstand temperatures of 60 degrees”.
The Green Mill Murder ... Greenwood, Kerry Best Price: $15.95 Buy New $11.57 (as of 07:12 UTC - Details) Overall, the Belarussian approach has been the least authoritarian in Europe. Belarussian football went ahead as normal and fans were allowed to continue attending games. Theatres, cafes and other social events continued and there was no shutdown of the economy. Victory Day Parades also went ahead on the 9th May despite being cancelled in countries such as Russia. Neither did Lukashenka delay scheduled elections, unlike Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand.
Western media treated Lukashenka’s approach as a laughable curiosity (in cases where they did not ignore it entirely). They mocked Lukashenka’s comments about vodka and saunas, using this was a way to avoid asking any deeper questions.
According to the official narrative, Belarus should have been a zone of death, destruction and disaster. Neil Ferguson’s modelling – one of the key pieces of propaganda used to put Britain in lockdown – predicted that left unchecked Covid 19 would kill between 54,090 and 71,616 Belarussians.
So what are the facts?
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-12-21--The Shocking Cruelty of Cancelling Christmas

So Christmas is cancelled .
The neo-Cromwellian edict has been issued .
The thing that Boris Johnson said would be ‘ inhuman ’ just a few days ago has now been done .
For the first time in centuries people in vast swathes of England – London and the South East – will be forbidden by law from celebrating Christmas together .
The government ’ s promise of five days ’ relief from the stifling , atomising , soul-destroying lockdown of everyday life has been snatched away from us .
It ’ s too risky , the experts say ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ harm .
You know what else will cause great harm ?
This cruel , disproportionate cancellation of Christmas ; this decree against family festivities and human engagement .
This evening Boris Johnson executed the most disturbing u-turn of his premiership : he scrapped the planned relaxation of lockdown rules for Christmas .
He commanded that London and the South East will be propelled into Tier 4 , yet another Kafkaesque category of authoritarianism dreamt up by our increasingly technocratic rulers .
This means no household mixing , including on Christmas Day .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family celebrations , cancelled with the swipe of a bureaucrat ’ s pen .
Other areas outside of London are luckier : Boris has graciously granted them one day off from the lockdown rules , on Christmas Day , when they may mix with people from other households .
They will no doubt give praise to their benevolent protectors for such festive if fleeting charity .
The Giving Tree with CD Silverstein , Shel Best Price : $ 5.14 Buy New $ 17.99 There is much that is disturbing about Boris ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the basis that a new strain of Covid-19 is spreading in the South East and seems more contagious than earlier strains .
That is certainly something we should be aware of .
But Boris also declared that there is no evidence that this new strain has led to ‘ increased mortality ’ .
So what is going on here ?
Surely before enacting the drastic , almost unprecedented measure of preventing millions of people from celebrating Christmas together the government should offer up clearer evidence of the significant social harms that would allegedly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and media elites go on and on about ‘ evidence-based policy ’ , except when it comes to locking people down .
Then it ’ s all ‘ Yeh , go ahead , better safe than sorry ’ .
Here ’ s the thing : everyone recognised that allowing greater household mixing and socialising at Christmas would have had an impact on Covid rates .
We understood that the virus would spread a little more .
That ’ s why some were predicting that we might need a bit more lockdown in January @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in cases over Christmas .
But I thought we had agreed that these risks were worth taking for the immeasurable good of facilitating human connection , of allowing and even encouraging people to congregate and celebrate and lose themselves in drink , food and love ?
I thought we had decided , pretty much collectively , that a rise in cases would be a price worth paying for the human food of family festivities and friends ’ celebrations ?
It seems that broad agreement has now been reversed , suddenly , unilaterally and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Taro Best Price : $ 12.75 Buy New $ 12.82 The government and its expert advisers say they have had to rethink the balance .
They now believe that allowing Christmas to go ahead will be too harmful – more harmful , apparently , than not allowing Christmas to go ahead .
But who are they to make this judgement ?
What gives them the right ?
It seems to me – as someone who understood perfectly well that a relaxed Christmas would cause some Covid problems – that the harms of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
No , not just in terms of missing out on ‘ a roast dinner ’ , as the lockdown fanatics in the media sniffily refer to the festival of Christmas when anyone insists on their right to celebrate it .
But also in terms of happiness , joy , a sense of meaning and connection in our lives .

So Christmas is cancelled. The neo-Cromwellian edict has been issued. The thing that Boris Johnson said would be ‘inhuman’ just a few days ago has now been done. For the first time in centuries people in vast swathes of England – London and the South East – will be forbidden by law from celebrating Christmas together. The government’s promise of five days’ relief from the stifling, atomising, soul-destroying lockdown of everyday life has been snatched away from us. It’s too risky, the experts say; the disease will spread and cause great harm. You know what else will cause great harm? This cruel, disproportionate cancellation of Christmas; this decree against family festivities and human engagement.
This evening Boris Johnson executed the most disturbing u-turn of his premiership: he scrapped the planned relaxation of lockdown rules for Christmas. He commanded that London and the South East will be propelled into Tier 4, yet another Kafkaesque category of authoritarianism dreamt up by our increasingly technocratic rulers. This means no household mixing, including on Christmas Day. That’s millions of planned get-togethers, family celebrations, cancelled with the swipe of a bureaucrat’s pen. Other areas outside of London are luckier: Boris has graciously granted them one day off from the lockdown rules, on Christmas Day, when they may mix with people from other households. They will no doubt give praise to their benevolent protectors for such festive if fleeting charity. The Giving Tree with CD Silverstein, Shel Best Price: $5.14 Buy New $17.99 (as of 07:14 UTC - Details)
There is much that is disturbing about Boris’s decree. It is being justified on the basis that a new strain of Covid-19 is spreading in the South East and seems more contagious than earlier strains. That is certainly something we should be aware of. But Boris also declared that there is no evidence that this new strain has led to ‘increased mortality’. So what is going on here? Surely before enacting the drastic, almost unprecedented measure of preventing millions of people from celebrating Christmas together the government should offer up clearer evidence of the significant social harms that would allegedly spring from such celebrations? The political and media elites go on and on about ‘evidence-based policy’, except when it comes to locking people down. Then it’s all ‘Yeh, go ahead, better safe than sorry’.
Here’s the thing: everyone recognised that allowing greater household mixing and socialising at Christmas would have had an impact on Covid rates. We understood that the virus would spread a little more. That’s why some were predicting that we might need a bit more lockdown in January, to deal with the likely rise in cases over Christmas. But I thought we had agreed that these risks were worth taking for the immeasurable good of facilitating human connection, of allowing and even encouraging people to congregate and celebrate and lose themselves in drink, food and love? I thought we had decided, pretty much collectively, that a rise in cases would be a price worth paying for the human food of family festivities and friends’ celebrations? It seems that broad agreement has now been reversed, suddenly, unilaterally and with insufficient justification. Everyone Poops Gomi, Taro Best Price: $12.75 Buy New $12.82 (as of 07:14 UTC - Details)
The government and its expert advisers say they have had to rethink the balance. They now believe that allowing Christmas to go ahead will be too harmful – more harmful, apparently, than not allowing Christmas to go ahead. But who are they to make this judgement? What gives them the right? It seems to me – as someone who understood perfectly well that a relaxed Christmas would cause some Covid problems – that the harms of cancelling Christmas are very, very significant. No, not just in terms of missing out on ‘a roast dinner’, as the lockdown fanatics in the media sniffily refer to the festival of Christmas when anyone insists on their right to celebrate it. But also in terms of happiness, joy, a sense of meaning and connection in our lives.
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-12-21--The Woke Left Is Demonizing Parents and Wants To Abolish the Family

Children raised in a nuclear family are safer , healthier , happier , and more successful .
So , of course , the radicals want to abolish it and raise kids in communes , because “ parents are tyrants.
” 2020 has been a year of pandemics .
The most prominent of these is coronavirus , which has killed over a million people worldwide and wreaked havoc on the global economy .
But it isn ’ t the only problematic outbreak to ravage the globe in 2020 – the pandemic of woke idiocy continues to rage unabated .
One particularly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the agenda that espouses eliminating the nuclear family .
As a parent and a leftist , I find this assault on parents and nuclear families to be the height of self-serving and self-defeating intellectual masturbation .
The World Needs More P ... Hart , Benjamin Best Price : $ 6.05 Buy New $ 10.15 A perfect example of this mindless mania is a recent tweet from Noah Berlatsky , a pissant provocateur and philosophical poseur who writes for the Guardian and the Atlantic magazine .
Berlatsky whined , “ parents are tyrants .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like rich people or white people.
” He followed that belch into the woke echo chamber with this equally odious one : “ There are things you can try to do to minimize the abuse that ’ s endemic to the parent/child relationship , but it ’ s always there.
” Apparently , someone didn ’ t change baby Berlatsky ’ s dirty diaper fast enough and now we all have to deal with the stink .
Sadly , Berlatsky ’ s buffoonery is not an outlier , as this anti-family mindset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Examples of this absurd agenda being aggressively pushed abound .
Black Lives Matter , the standard bearer for woke , fact-free , emotion-fueled idiocy in 2020 , and which has garnered establishment support and millions in corporate donations , not only declare that they want to “ abolish police , ” but also “ abolish the family.
” Flagship left-wing publications like the Nation , Vice , and Jacobin have all in recent months and years dedicated time and energy to the malignant anti-family cause .
In addition , Sophie Lewis , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she proves is an oxymoron , has made a name for herself attacking the nuclear family in her book ‘ Full Surrogacy Now : Feminism Against the Family ’ .
Lewis , an Oxford-educated bulls**t artist , uses pretentious language and provocative statements to camouflage her laughably pubescent arguments .
An example of Lewis ’ utopianist jackassery is found in her article , ‘ The Coronavirus Crisis Shows It ’ s Time to Abolish the Family ’ , where her “ logical ” approach to combat the virus is revealed as , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dismiss all the workers with full pay so they can… pursue laziness for at least the next decade.
” Lewis likes tilting at windmills as evidenced by her desire to “ denaturalize the mother-child bond ” and to promote “ the idea that babies belong to anyone – the idea that the product of gestational labor gets transferred as property to a set of people.
” Lewis further reveals her intellectual obtuseness and foolish anti-family fanaticism by declaring , “ even when the private nuclear household poses no direct physical or mental threat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spouse-battering , no child rape , and no queer-bashing – the private family qua mode of social reproduction still , frankly , sucks .
It genders , nationalizes and races us… It makes us believe we are ‘ individuals.
’ ” Of course , according to the anti-family left , the answer to the parent problem is that , like Hillary Clinton long ago taught us… it takes a village to raise a child .
While it may very well take a village to satiate Hillary ’ s husband ’ s gargantuan sexual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and communal parenting are never a healthy option for children or society .
For instance , a bevy of high-profile Hollywood stars have grown up in communes and cults where the nuclear family was replaced with a communal approach and it was more ordeal than ideal .
The famed Arquette family , which includes Roseanne , Patricia , and David , grew up in a commune , as did Winona Ryder .
None of them speak highly of the experience , which included a lack of electricity and running water and rampant drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at D ... Pearlman , Robb Best Price : $ 11.66 Buy New $ 13.44 Rose McGowan , as well as Joaquin and River Phoenix , grew up in the communal , ‘ free love ’ Children of God sect that was rife with child sexual abuse .
McGowan said of the experience , “ There ’ s a trail of some very damaged children that were in this group… I got out by the skin of my teeth.
” Studies show that stepparents or non-biological guardians of children are astronomically more likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yes , there are certainly awful parents in the world who abuse and neglect their own biological children , but Berlatsky bemoaning parental power dynamics and Lewis lamenting gestational labor are , ironically , the intellectual equivalent of a toddler ’ s tantrum .
Wanting to eliminate the nuclear family because some people have had traumatic experiences is infinitely asinine and embarrassingly infantile ; it is akin to demanding that the Sun stop rising in the east because you got sunburn .
As any parent will tell you , raising a child is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but it is worth it as study after study shows .
Growing up in a nuclear family is , contrary to the anti-family left , not an albatross but an advantage in terms of mental , emotional , physical , and social health , as well as education achievement and income level .
What all children need are parents who love , comfort , protect , and guide them .
And what these delusional anti-family advocates need is a reality check… and a swift kick in the ass .
I ’ d @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statements , views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT .

Children raised in a nuclear family are safer, healthier, happier, and more successful. So, of course, the radicals want to abolish it and raise kids in communes, because “parents are tyrants.”
2020 has been a year of pandemics.
The most prominent of these is coronavirus, which has killed over a million people worldwide and wreaked havoc on the global economy.
But it isn’t the only problematic outbreak to ravage the globe in 2020 – the pandemic of woke idiocy continues to rage unabated.
One particularly imbecilic strain of this vicious virus is the agenda that espouses eliminating the nuclear family.
As a parent and a leftist, I find this assault on parents and nuclear families to be the height of self-serving and self-defeating intellectual masturbation. The World Needs More P... Hart, Benjamin Best Price: $6.05 Buy New $10.15 (as of 07:15 UTC - Details)
A perfect example of this mindless mania is a recent tweet from Noah Berlatsky, a pissant provocateur and philosophical poseur who writes for the Guardian and the Atlantic magazine. Berlatsky whined, “parents are tyrants. ‘parent’ is an oppressive class, like rich people or white people.”
He followed that belch into the woke echo chamber with this equally odious one: “There are things you can try to do to minimize the abuse that’s endemic to the parent/child relationship, but it’s always there.”
Apparently, someone didn’t change baby Berlatsky’s dirty diaper fast enough and now we all have to deal with the stink.
Sadly, Berlatsky’s buffoonery is not an outlier, as this anti-family mindset is rampant among the woke left. Examples of this absurd agenda being aggressively pushed abound.
Black Lives Matter, the standard bearer for woke, fact-free, emotion-fueled idiocy in 2020, and which has garnered establishment support and millions in corporate donations, not only declare that they want to “abolish police,” but also “abolish the family.”
Flagship left-wing publications like the Nation, Vice, and Jacobin have all in recent months and years dedicated time and energy to the malignant anti-family cause.
In addition, Sophie Lewis, a self-described “feminist thinker,” which she proves is an oxymoron, has made a name for herself attacking the nuclear family in her book ‘Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against the Family’.
Lewis, an Oxford-educated bulls**t artist, uses pretentious language and provocative statements to camouflage her laughably pubescent arguments.
An example of Lewis’ utopianist jackassery is found in her article, ‘The Coronavirus Crisis Shows It’s Time to Abolish the Family’, where her “logical” approach to combat the virus is revealed as, “Free all prisoners and detainees now… and dismiss all the workers with full pay so they can… pursue laziness for at least the next decade.”
Lewis likes tilting at windmills as evidenced by her desire to “denaturalize the mother-child bond” and to promote “the idea that babies belong to anyone – the idea that the product of gestational labor gets transferred as property to a set of people.”
Lewis further reveals her intellectual obtuseness and foolish anti-family fanaticism by declaring, “even when the private nuclear household poses no direct physical or mental threat to one’s person – no spouse-battering, no child rape, and no queer-bashing – the private family qua mode of social reproduction still, frankly, sucks. It genders, nationalizes and races us… It makes us believe we are ‘individuals.’”
Individuals? Perish the thought!
Of course, according to the anti-family left, the answer to the parent problem is that, like Hillary Clinton long ago taught us… it takes a village to raise a child.
While it may very well take a village to satiate Hillary’s husband’s gargantuan sexual appetite, history shows us that communes and communal parenting are never a healthy option for children or society.
For instance, a bevy of high-profile Hollywood stars have grown up in communes and cults where the nuclear family was replaced with a communal approach and it was more ordeal than ideal.
The famed Arquette family, which includes Roseanne, Patricia, and David, grew up in a commune, as did Winona Ryder. None of them speak highly of the experience, which included a lack of electricity and running water and rampant drug use. The Office: A Day at D... Pearlman, Robb Best Price: $11.66 Buy New $13.44 (as of 07:15 UTC - Details)
Rose McGowan, as well as Joaquin and River Phoenix, grew up in the communal, ‘free love’ Children of God sect that was rife with child sexual abuse.
McGowan said of the experience, “There’s a trail of some very damaged children that were in this group… I got out by the skin of my teeth.”
Studies show that stepparents or non-biological guardians of children are astronomically more likely to harm children than biological parents.
Yes, there are certainly awful parents in the world who abuse and neglect their own biological children, but Berlatsky bemoaning parental power dynamics and Lewis lamenting gestational labor are, ironically, the intellectual equivalent of a toddler’s tantrum.
Wanting to eliminate the nuclear family because some people have had traumatic experiences is infinitely asinine and embarrassingly infantile; it is akin to demanding that the Sun stop rising in the east because you got sunburn.
As any parent will tell you, raising a child is a Sisyphean task requiring a Herculean effort, but it is worth it as study after study shows. Growing up in a nuclear family is, contrary to the anti-family left, not an albatross but an advantage in terms of mental, emotional, physical, and social health, as well as education achievement and income level.
What all children need are parents who love, comfort, protect, and guide them. And what these delusional anti-family advocates need is a reality check… and a swift kick in the ass. I’d be happy to deliver both.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.


lewrockwell--2020-12-21--WHO Calls Into Question Ability of the RT-PCR Test To Detect Covid-19 (False Positives)

What Happened : On December 14th the World Health Organization ( WHO ) released a notice on their website titled “ WHO Information Notice for IVD Users ” regarding “ nucleic acid testing ( NAT ) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction ( RT-PCR ) for detection of SARS-CoV-2.
” In it they state that people who test positive for COVID-19 may not actually have COVID-19 , known as false positives .
They state the following , Miss Fisher ’ s Mu ... Greenwood , Kerry Buy New $ 49.27 The idea that some people who test positive for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been a common theme during this pandemic as many scientists and doctors have called into question the efficacy of the test for declaring a pandemic .
For example , 22 researchers have put out a paper explaining why , according to them , it ’ s quite clear that the PCR test is not effective in for identifying COVID-19 cases .
As a result we may be seeing a significant amount of false positives .
False negatives are also a possibility .
They claim that the test is completely useless for detecting COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the evidence behind their reasoning here .
The site where the paper is found was put up by Prof. Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer , specialist in Virology / Immunology / Human Biology / Cell Biology , University Hospital Würzburg , Germany , Dr. Pieter Borger ( MSc , PhD ) , Molecular Genetics , W+W Research Associate , Lörrach , Germany and Rajesh Kumar Malhotra ( Artist Alias : Bobby Rajesh Malhotra ) , Former 3D Artist / Scientific Visualizations at CeMM – Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Arts – Department for Digital Arts Vienna , Austria .
It was a response to a recent publication titled “ Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus ( 2019-nCoV ) by real-time RT-PCR ” arguing that the tests are indeed accurate .
As a result of these concerns and inaccuracies with testing many doctors , scientists and journalists are urging government health authorities to listen to them when it comes to their recommendations for mass testing .
For example , an article recently published in the British Medical Journal ( BMJ ) titled “ Covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ false sense of security , minister admits ” explains how the testing being deployed in parts of the UK is simply not at all accurate for asymptomatic people and argues that it can not accurately determine if one is positive or negative .
The article expresses the opinion that asymptomatic people should simply not be tested because of the inaccuracies of the tests being used , and there is also much controversy as to whether or not asymptomatic people can even spread the virus and infect others .
Another article published in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for covid-19 is of unknown value , but is being introduced nationwide ” shares the same type of sentiments .
As far as false positives go , the Deputy Medical Officer of Ontario , Canada , Dr. Barbara Yaffe recently stated that COVID-19 testing may yield at least 50 percent false positives .
This means that people who test positive for COVID may not actually have it .
In July , professor Carl Heneghan , director for the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University and outspoken critic of the current UK response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ titled “ How many Covid diagnoses are false positives ?
” He has argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false in the UK could also be as high as 50 % .
As far back as 2007 , Gina Kolata published an article in the New York times about how declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in a disaster .
The article was titled Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn ’ t .
Former scientific advisor at Pfizer , Dr. Mike Yeadon , also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discussed at the beginning of this article , argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false may actually be as high as 90 % .
The Bulgarian Pathology Association claims that PCR tests are “ scientific meaningless ” to detect COVID-19 .
They cite an article published in “ Off Guardian ” that goes into more detail and explanation as to why .
The idea that many COVID-19 cases around the world could be false positives is quite a common theme .
British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab stated that , A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tests used to detect COVID-19 are not able to prove an infection beyond a reasonable doubt .
You can read more about that story here .
A number of everyday citizens have also come forward expressing their doubts , including some high profile people like Elon Musk for example .
He recently revealed he had four tests completed in one day .
Using the same test and the same nurse , he received two positive results and two negative results , causing him to state his belief that “ something bogus ” is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his Twitter following In the Portuguese appeal hearing , Jaafar et al .
( 2020 ) was cited , stating that “ if someone is testing by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used ( as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US ) , the probability that said person is infected is < 3 % , and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97 % .
” The court further noted that the cycle threshold used for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is unknown .
I just wanted to provide a brief background as to why there is so much controversy out there regarding COVID-19 testing and false positives .
On the other side of the coin , According to Dr. Matthew Oughton , an infectious diseases specialist at the McGill University Health Centre and the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal : According to Dr. Robert H. Shmerling , Senior Faculty Editor at Harvard Health Publishing .
Why This Is Important : This information is important because it sheds light on the accuracy of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to justify lockdown measures all over the world .
For some reason , mainstream media is giving no attention to the tens and thousands of doctors , scientists and peer-reviewed publications that are and have been raising great concerns with lockdown measures to combat COVID-19 .
For example , Dr. Martin Kulldorff , professor of medicine at Harvard University , a biostatistician , and epidemiologist , Dr. Sunetra Gupta , professor at Oxford University , an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology , and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya , professor at Stanford University Medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Great Barrington Declaration .
It also has an impressive list of co-signers and has now been signed by approximately 50,000 doctors and scientists all over the world .
They argue that we can protect the vulnerable without lockdown measures .
The declaration opposes lockdown measures for multiple reasons , one of the is that the survival rate of COVID-19 for people under 70 years of age is 99.95 percent , and they claim that COVID-19 is less dangerous than the flu for children .
The Great Barrington Declaration states the following : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emphasizes that “ Taken together , the data are clear both that national lockdowns are not a necessary condition for Covid-19 infections to decrease and that the Prime Minister was incorrect to suggest to MPs that infections were increasing rapidly in England prior to lockdown and that without national measures , the NHS would be overwhelmed.
” Another article published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can read more about that and access it here .
Small business around the globe are being killed , while big chain business and Big Food chains like Walmart , for example , are thriving .
An estimate from the United Nations World Food Program indicates that pandemic lockdowns causing breaks in the food chain are expected to push 135 million people into severe hunger and starvation by the end of this year .
The idea that herd immunity can be reached was ridiculed by mainstream media , particularly Dr. Anthony Fauci after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ traction .
Fauci was able to share his opinion across the planet with access to multiple mainstream media networks .
The Great Barrington Declaration was largely ignored , ridiculed , and the doctors/scientists who support it were not given an opportunity to respond , nor have they been given any air time on any mainstream media network .
Below is an interesting re-tweet from Michael Levitt , a nobel prize winning chemist from Stanford University .
It gives you something to think about that ’ s on par with the discussion being had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If Testing Isn ’ t Accurate , How Many Deaths Marked As “ COVID ” Deaths Have Actually Been A Result of COVID ?
Another common theme during this pandemic seems to be the idea that people who are dying of other causes are also being counted as COVID-19 deaths , thus possibly giving an inaccurate death count when it comes to attributing deaths to COVID-19 .
For example , according to Ontario ( Canada ) public health , “ Any case marked ast “ Fatal ” is included in the deaths data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 was determined to be a contributing or underlying cause of death… ” This means that if someone dies from suicide for example , a car accident or a heart attack , they may still be counted in the COVID-19 death count .
Christmas Cocoa Murder Erickson , Alex Best Price : $ 3.60 Buy New $ 7.19 Toronto Public Health tweeted in late June that “ Individuals who have died with COVID-19 , but not as a result of COVID-19 , are included in the case counts for COVID-19 deaths in Toronto.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 6 % of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 , COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned .
For all other deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average , there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death .
You can read more about that here .
These are a few of many examples , I just wanted to get the point across .
Final Thoughts : Many of the thoughts and facts expressed in this article are opinions that the mainstream fails to have a proper discussion about .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that calls into question the measures taken by governments and health authorities all over the world is completely ignored , ridiculed and sometimes even called a “ conspiracy theory.
” Never before have we seen so much science censored by Facebook “ fact-checkers.
” Why is there a digital authoritarian Orwellian fact-checker going around censoring science that is passing through the peer-review process of multiple science journals ?
Should people not have the right to examine information transparently and openly and determine for themselves what is and what isn ’ t ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ conversations ?
Why can ’ t we understand the viewpoint of another who does not agree with us , empathise with them and try to truly understand why they believe what they do ?
Ultimately we have to ask ourselves if governments and health authorities are truly executing the will of the people or even listening to them and all , or simply listening to the ones who agree with them .
Do we really want to live in a world where so many voices are silenced and censored ?
Should we really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shut down the planet for a virus that has such a low mortality ?
Does mainstream media have the ability to make the majority seem like the minority and the minority seem like the majority ?
Should recommendations simply be made and people have the freedoms to do as they please when so many things just don ’ t seem right ?
Are we told the entire truth when it comes to global chaos and such events ?
Or , as the Editor of The BMJ recently expressed , has science become corrupt @ @ @ @ @ @

What Happened: On December 14th the World Health Organization (WHO) released a notice on their website titled “WHO Information Notice for IVD Users” regarding “nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2.”
In it they state that people who test positive for COVID-19 may not actually have COVID-19, known as false positives. They state the following,
WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.As with any diagnostic procedure, the positive and negative predictive values for the product in a given testing population are important to note. As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases. This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc.
Miss Fisher’s Mu... Greenwood, Kerry Buy New $49.27 (as of 07:16 UTC - Details) The idea that some people who test positive for COVID-19 may not actually have COVID-19 has been a common theme during this pandemic as many scientists and doctors have called into question the efficacy of the test for declaring a pandemic. For example, 22 researchers have put out a paper explaining why, according to them, it’s quite clear that the PCR test is not effective in for identifying COVID-19 cases. As a result we may be seeing a significant amount of false positives. False negatives are also a possibility. They claim that the test is completely useless for detecting COVID-19.
You can read the entire paper and the evidence behind their reasoning here. The site where the paper is found was put up by Prof. Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer, specialist in Virology / Immunology / Human Biology / Cell Biology, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany, Dr. Pieter Borger (MSc, PhD), Molecular Genetics, W+W Research Associate, Lörrach, Germany and Rajesh Kumar Malhotra (Artist Alias: Bobby Rajesh Malhotra), Former 3D Artist / Scientific Visualizations at CeMM – Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (2019-2020), University for Applied Arts – Department for Digital Arts Vienna, Austria.
It was a response to a recent publication titled “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” arguing that the tests are indeed accurate.
As a result of these concerns and inaccuracies with testing many doctors, scientists and journalists are urging government health authorities to listen to them when it comes to their recommendations for mass testing. For example, an article recently published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) titled “Covid-19: Mass testing is inaccurate and gives false sense of security, minister admits” explains how the testing being deployed in parts of the UK is simply not at all accurate for asymptomatic people and argues that it cannot accurately determine if one is positive or negative. The article expresses the opinion that asymptomatic people should simply not be tested because of the inaccuracies of the tests being used, and there is also much controversy as to whether or not asymptomatic people can even spread the virus and infect others.
Another article published in the BMJ titled “Screening the health population for covid-19 is of unknown value, but is being introduced nationwide” shares the same type of sentiments.
More Statements Regarding False Positives
As far as false positives go, the Deputy Medical Officer of Ontario, Canada, Dr. Barbara Yaffe recently stated that COVID-19 testing may yield at least 50 percent false positives. This means that people who test positive for COVID may not actually have it.
In July, professor Carl Heneghan, director for the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University and outspoken critic of the current UK response to the pandemic, wrote a piece titled “How many Covid diagnoses are false positives?” He has argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false in the UK could also be as high as 50%.
As far back as 2007, Gina Kolata published an article in the New York times about how declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in a disaster. The article was titled Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
Former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, also one of the authors of the paper discussed at the beginning of this article, argued that the proportion of positive tests that are false may actually be as high as 90%.
The Bulgarian Pathology Association claims that PCR tests are “scientific meaningless” to detect COVID-19. They cite an article published in “Off Guardian” that goes into more detail and explanation as to why.
The idea that many COVID-19 cases around the world could be false positives is quite a common theme. British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab stated that,
The false positive rate is very high, so only seven percent of tests will be successful in identifying those that actually have the virus.
Is Raab implying a 93 percent false positive rate?
A Portuguese court recently determined that the PCR tests used to detect COVID-19 are not able to prove an infection beyond a reasonable doubt. You can read more about that story here.
A number of everyday citizens have also come forward expressing their doubts, including some high profile people like Elon Musk for example. He recently revealed he had four tests completed in one day. Using the same test and the same nurse, he received two positive results and two negative results, causing him to state his belief that “something bogus” is going on here. He then asked his Twitter following
In your opinion, at what Ct number for the cov2 N1 gene should a PCR test probably be regarded as positive? If I’m asking the wrong question, what is a better question?”
In the Portuguese appeal hearing, Jaafar et al. (2020) was cited, stating that “if someone is testing by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is <3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” The court further noted that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.
I just wanted to provide a brief background as to why there is so much controversy out there regarding COVID-19 testing and false positives.
On the other side of the coin,
According to Dr. Matthew Oughton, an infectious diseases specialist at the McGill University Health Centre and the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal:
”The rate of false positives with this particular test is quite low. In other words, if the test comes back saying positive, then believe it, it’s a real positive.”
According to Dr. Robert H. Shmerling, Senior Faculty Editor at Harvard Health Publishing.
False negatives – that is, a test that says you don’t have the virus when you actually do have the virus – may occur. The reported rate of false negatives is as low as 2% and as high as 37%. The false positive rate – that is, how often the test says you have the virus when you actually do not – should be close to zero. Most false-positive results are thought to be due to lab contamination or other problems with how the lab has performed the test, not limitations of the test itself
Why This Is Important: This information is important because it sheds light on the accuracy of the testing, which in turn is being used to justify lockdown measures all over the world. For some reason, mainstream media is giving no attention to the tens and thousands of doctors, scientists and peer-reviewed publications that are and have been raising great concerns with lockdown measures to combat COVID-19.
For example, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician and epidemiologist initiated The Great Barrington Declaration. It also has an impressive list of co-signers and has now been signed by approximately 50,000 doctors and scientists all over the world.
They argue that we can protect the vulnerable without lockdown measures.
The declaration opposes lockdown measures for multiple reasons, one of the is that the survival rate of COVID-19 for people under 70 years of age is 99.95 percent, and they claim that COVID-19 is less dangerous than the flu for children.
The Great Barrington Declaration states the following:
“Covid-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable…”
The British Medical Journal article cited earlier emphasizes that “Taken together, the data are clear both that national lockdowns are not a necessary condition for Covid-19 infections to decrease and that the Prime Minister was incorrect to suggest to MPs that infections were increasing rapidly in England prior to lockdown and that without national measures, the NHS would be overwhelmed.”
Another article published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus. You can read more about that and access it here.
Small business around the globe are being killed, while big chain business and Big Food chains like Walmart, for example, are thriving.
An estimate from the United Nations World Food Program indicates that pandemic lockdowns causing breaks in the food chain are expected to push 135 million people into severe hunger and starvation by the end of this year.
The idea that herd immunity can be reached was ridiculed by mainstream media, particularly Dr. Anthony Fauci after The Great Barrington Declaration started to gain traction. Fauci was able to share his opinion across the planet with access to multiple mainstream media networks. The Great Barrington Declaration was largely ignored, ridiculed, and the doctors/scientists who support it were not given an opportunity to respond, nor have they been given any air time on any mainstream media network.
Below is an interesting re-tweet from Michael Levitt, a nobel prize winning chemist from Stanford University. It gives you something to think about that’s on par with the discussion being had in this article regarding PCR tests.
If Testing Isn’t Accurate, How Many Deaths Marked As “COVID” Deaths Have Actually Been A Result of COVID?
Another common theme during this pandemic seems to be the idea that people who are dying of other causes are also being counted as COVID-19 deaths, thus possibly giving an inaccurate death count when it comes to attributing deaths to COVID-19.
For example, according to Ontario (Canada) public health, “Any case marked ast “Fatal” is included in the deaths data. Deaths are included whether or not COVID-19 was determined to be a contributing or underlying cause of death…”
“As a result of how data is recorded by health units into public health information databases, the ministry is not able to accurately separate how many people died directly because of COVID versus those who died with a COVID infection,” Ontario Ministry of Health Senior Communications Advisor Anna Miller (source)
This means that if someone dies from suicide for example, a car accident or a heart attack, they may still be counted in the COVID-19 death count.
If you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live and then you were also found to have COVID, that would be counted as COVID death, despite if you died of a clear alternative cause it’s still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who is listed as a COVID death that doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death. – Dr. Ngozi Ezike, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health
Christmas Cocoa Murder Erickson, Alex Best Price: $3.60 Buy New $7.19 (as of 07:16 UTC - Details) Toronto Public Health tweeted in late June that “Individuals who have died with COVID-19, but not as a result of COVID-19, are included in the case counts for COVID-19 deaths in Toronto.”
According to the CDC, for 6% of the deaths attributed to COVID-19, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For all other deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. You can read more about that here.
These are a few of many examples, I just wanted to get the point across.
Final Thoughts: Many of the thoughts and facts expressed in this article are opinions that the mainstream fails to have a proper discussion about. It seems that any type of controversial fact that calls into question the measures taken by governments and health authorities all over the world is completely ignored, ridiculed and sometimes even called a “conspiracy theory.” Never before have we seen so much science censored by Facebook “fact-checkers.”
Over the last few months, I have seen academic articles and op-eds by professors retracted or labeled “fake news” by social media platforms. Often, no explanation is provided. I am concerned about this heavy-handedness and, at times, outright censorship. – Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH (source)
Why is there a digital authoritarian Orwellian fact-checker going around censoring science that is passing through the peer-review process of multiple science journals? Should people not have the right to examine information transparently and openly and determine for themselves what is and what isn’t? Why do we fail to have these conversations? Why can’t we understand the viewpoint of another who does not agree with us, empathise with them and try to truly understand why they believe what they do?
Ultimately we have to ask ourselves if governments and health authorities are truly executing the will of the people or even listening to them and all, or simply listening to the ones who agree with them. Do we really want to live in a world where so many voices are silenced and censored? Should we really allow governments to have the authority to shut down the planet for a virus that has such a low mortality? Does mainstream media have the ability to make the majority seem like the minority and the minority seem like the majority? Should recommendations simply be made and people have the freedoms to do as they please when so many things just don’t seem right? Are we told the entire truth when it comes to global chaos and such events? Or, as the Editor of The BMJ recently expressed, has science become corrupt and politicized for ulterior motives?
Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.


lewrockwell--2020-12-21--’Tis the Season for Unreason

’Tis the Season for Unreason

NEW YORK—Here we go again , the annual holiest of holies is upon us , although to this oldie last Christmas feels like it was yesterday .
Funny how time never seemed to pass quickly during those lazy days of long ago , but now rolls off like a movie calendar showing the days , months , years flashing by .
Nostalgia is said to be corny , but for me it ’ s one of the many joys of Christmas .
Everyone remembers past Christmases , whether happy or sad , and mine are mostly the former .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made it possible for German and British soldiers to play a friendly football match during the Great War .
Just imagine if the troops on both sides had refused to slaughter each other further and demanded that the fat generals sitting on their backsides in grand country houses miles from the front dueled each other for a change .
On another Christmas Day , in 1944 , I saw a Greek commie rebel coming at us pointing a rifle and someone from my house ( most likely my dad ) shot him dead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feeling very sorry for the commie while he lay there for three days as the battle raged .
Queen of the Flowers ( ... Greenwood , Kerry Best Price : $ 6.70 Buy New $ 11.89 Things are more peaceful now , but only here on the Upper East Side , which lies mostly empty .
The gunfire is north , south , and east from here , the Bronx , the Lower East Side , and in Brooklyn-Queens .
The latest rage is for straphangers using the subway to be thrown on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The perpetrators are always described as mentally unstable , but I beg to differ .
They turn incoherent once arrested , which is rare , but are pretty coherent when they demand money from mostly aged women riding to work .
Four who were arrested had unpronounceable names , none of which appeared on the Social Register , the American Bible of the extinct upper class , if you catch my drift .
Never mind .
This is Christmas and I must think of good things to write .
Mind you , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truths with whatever they ’ re selling , the only voice that clearly and serenely tells it like it is nowadays , as always , is that of the Church .
I recently spoke at my friend Father Benedict ’ s benefit for beleaguered Christians in the Middle East , and for once my speech worked .
I included criticism of the Pope , who seems to be more concerned with open borders for Africans than the persecution of Christians by Islamic zealots .
The latest murders of Christians at the hands of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to register at The New York Times and other such fake-news producers .
The American ambassador in Nigeria has downplayed the role of Boko Haram , the terrorist organization that kills and abducts Christians .
What will it take for Americans and Europeans to wake up and do something about our fellow coreligionists ?
Sixty-three thousand victims to date and thousands of churches torched and we keep sending aid for fat Nigerian crooks to plunder .
The Best of Taki Theodoracopulos

NEW YORK—Here we go again, the annual holiest of holies is upon us, although to this oldie last Christmas feels like it was yesterday. Funny how time never seemed to pass quickly during those lazy days of long ago, but now rolls off like a movie calendar showing the days, months, years flashing by. Nostalgia is said to be corny, but for me it’s one of the many joys of Christmas. Everyone remembers past Christmases, whether happy or sad, and mine are mostly the former. The date of our Lord’s birth made it possible for German and British soldiers to play a friendly football match during the Great War. Just imagine if the troops on both sides had refused to slaughter each other further and demanded that the fat generals sitting on their backsides in grand country houses miles from the front dueled each other for a change. On another Christmas Day, in 1944, I saw a Greek commie rebel coming at us pointing a rifle and someone from my house (most likely my dad) shot him dead before my very eyes. I remember feeling very sorry for the commie while he lay there for three days as the battle raged.
Queen of the Flowers (... Greenwood, Kerry Best Price: $6.70 Buy New $11.89 (as of 07:17 UTC - Details) Things are more peaceful now, but only here on the Upper East Side, which lies mostly empty. The gunfire is north, south, and east from here, the Bronx, the Lower East Side, and in Brooklyn-Queens. The latest rage is for straphangers using the subway to be thrown on the tracks in front of speeding trains. The perpetrators are always described as mentally unstable, but I beg to differ. They turn incoherent once arrested, which is rare, but are pretty coherent when they demand money from mostly aged women riding to work. Four who were arrested had unpronounceable names, none of which appeared on the Social Register, the American Bible of the extinct upper class, if you catch my drift.
Never mind. This is Christmas and I must think of good things to write. Mind you, with PR hacks and so-called influencers substituting truths with whatever they’re selling, the only voice that clearly and serenely tells it like it is nowadays, as always, is that of the Church. I recently spoke at my friend Father Benedict’s benefit for beleaguered Christians in the Middle East, and for once my speech worked. I included criticism of the Pope, who seems to be more concerned with open borders for Africans than the persecution of Christians by Islamic zealots. The latest murders of Christians at the hands of Muslim terrorists in Nigeria does not seem to register at The New York Times and other such fake-news producers. The American ambassador in Nigeria has downplayed the role of Boko Haram, the terrorist organization that kills and abducts Christians. What will it take for Americans and Europeans to wake up and do something about our fellow coreligionists? Sixty-three thousand victims to date and thousands of churches torched and we keep sending aid for fat Nigerian crooks to plunder.
Read the Whole Article
The Best of Taki Theodoracopulos


lewrockwell--2020-12-21--Secret, Invisible Evidence of Russian Hacking Is Not Actually Evidence

The Communist Party of China has been covertly sending arms to extremist Antifa militants in the United States in preparation for the civil war which is expected to take place after Joe Biden declares himself President for Life and institutes a Marxist dictatorship .
The weapons shipments include rocket launchers , directed energy weapons , nunchucks and ninja throwing stars .
Unfortunately I can not provide evidence for this shocking revelation as doing so would compromise my sources and methods , but trust me it ’ s definitely true and must be acted upon immediately .
I recommend President Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s hesitation and begin planning a military response to these Chinese aggressions .
How does this make you feel ?
Was your first impulse to begin scanning for evidence of the incendiary claim I made in my opening paragraph ?
Murder on the SS Rosa : ... Strauss , Lee Best Price : $ 4.48 Buy New $ 9.99 It would be perfectly reasonable if it was .
I am after all some random person on the internet whom you have probably never met , and you ’ ve no reason to accept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blind faith .
It would make sense for you to want to see some verification of my claim , and then dismiss my claim as baseless hogwash when I failed to provide that verification .
If you ’ re a more regular reader , it would have also been reasonable for you to guess that I was doing a bit .
But imagine if I wasn ’ t ?
Imagine if I really was claiming that the Chinese government is arming Antifa ninja warriors to kill patriotic Americans in the coming Biden Wars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be to believe what I was saying without my providing hard , verifiable evidence for my claims ?
Now imagine further that this is something I ’ ve made false claims about many times in the past .
If every few years I make a new claim about some naughty government arming Antifa super soldiers in a great communist uprising , which turns out later to have been bogus .
Well you ’ d dismiss me as a crackpot , wouldn ’ t you ?
I wouldn ’ t blame you .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such a ridiculous spectacle .
And yet if I were an employee of a US government agency making unproven incendiary claims about a government that isn ’ t aligned with the US-centralized power alliance , the entire political/media class would be parroting what I said as though it ’ s an established fact .
Even though US government agencies have an extensive and well-documented history of lying about such things .
Today we ’ re all expected to be freaking out about Russia again because Russia hacked the United States again right before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so now it ’ s very important that we support new cold war escalations from both the outgoing president and the incoming president again .
We ’ re not allowed to see the evidence that this actually happened again , but it ’ s of utmost importance that we trust and support new aggressions against Russia anyway .
Again .
Saddled with Murder ( D ... Brady , Eileen Best Price : $ 7.99 Buy New $ 6.98 The New York Times has a viral op-ed going around titled “ I Was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re Being Hacked.
” The article ’ s author Thomas P Bossert warns ominously that “ the networks of the federal government and much of corporate America are compromised by a foreign nation ” perpetrated by “ the Russian intelligence agency known as the S.V.R.
, whose tradecraft is among the most advanced in the world.
” Rather than using its supreme tradecraft to interfere in the November election ensuring the victory of the president we ’ ve been told for years is a Russian asset by outlets like The New York @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SVR instead opted to hack a private American IT company called SolarWinds whose software is widely used by the US government .
“ Unsuspecting customers then downloaded a corrupted version of the software , which included a hidden back door that gave hackers access to the victim ’ s network , ” Bossert explains , saying that “ The magnitude of this ongoing attack is hard to overstate.
” Its magnitude is so great that Bossert says Trump must “ severely punish the Russians ” for perpetrating it , and cooperate with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that that punishment continues seamlessly between administrations .
The problem is that , as usual , we ’ ve been given exactly zero evidence for any of this .
As Moon of Alabama explains , the only technical analysis we ’ ve seen of the alleged hack ( courtesy of cybersecurity firm FireEye ) makes no claim that Russia was responsible for it , yet the mass media are flagrantly asserting as objective , verified fact that Russia is behind this far-reaching intrusion into US government networks , citing only anonymous sources if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Mendelssohn ... Greenwood , Kerry Best Price : $ 3.86 Buy New $ 8.69 And of course where the media class goes so too does the barely-separate political class .
Democratic Senator Dick Durbin told CNN in a recent interview that this invisible , completely unproven cyberattack constitutes “ virtually a declaration of war by Russia on the United States.
” Which is always soothing language to hear as the Russian government announces the development of new hypersonic missiles as part of a new nuclear arms race it attributes to US cold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of the few high-profile voices who ’ ve had the temerity to stick his head above the parapet and point out the fact that we have seen exactly zero evidence for these incendiary claims , for which he is of course currently being raked over the coals on Twitter .
“ I know it doesn ’ t matter .
I know it ’ s wrong to ask the question .
I know asking the question raises grave doubts about one ’ s loyalties and patriotism , ” Greenwald sarcastically tweeted .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presented , let alone dispositive proof , that Russia is responsible for this hack ?
” “ Perhaps they have information sources they can ’ t describe without compromising sources and methods ?
” chimed in Ars Technica ‘ s Timothy B Lee in response to Greenwald ’ s query , a textbook reply from establishment narrative managers whenever anyone questions where the evidence is for any of these invisible attacks on US sovereignty .
“ Of course they can ’ t show us the evidence !
” proponents of establishment Russia hysteria @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compromise their sources and methods if they did !
” US spook agencies always say this about evidence for US spook agency claims about governments long targeted for destruction by US spook agencies .
We can ’ t share the evidence with you because the evidence is classified .
It ’ s secret evidence .
The evidence is invisible .
Which always works out very nicely for the US spook agencies , I must say .
Secret , invisible evidence is not evidence .
If the public can not see the evidence behind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then those claims are unproven .
It would never be acceptable for anyone in power to say “ This important thing with potentially world-altering consequences definitely happened , but you ’ ll just have to trust us because the evidence is secret.
” In a post-Iraq invasion world it is orders of magnitude more unacceptable , and should therefore be dismissed until hard , verifiable evidence is provided .
The Perfect 10 : A Palm ... O'Keefe , Eric Best Price : $ 7.99 Buy New $ 18.95 Isn ’ t it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9/11s of our day are completely invisible to the public ?
We can ’ t see cyber-intrusions for ourselves like we could see fallen buildings and smoking naval bases ; they ’ re entirely hidden from our view .
Not only are they entirely hidden from our view , the evidence that they happened is kept secret from us as well .
And the mass media just treat this as normal and fine .
Government agencies with an extensive history of lying are allowed to make completely unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims about governments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the institutions responsible for informing the public about what ’ s going on in the world simply repeat it as fact .
Sure it ’ s possible that Russia hacked the US .
It ’ s possible that the US government has been in contact with extraterrestrials , too .
It ’ s possible that the Chinese government is covertly arming Antifa samurai in preparation for a civil war .
But we do not imbue these things with the power of belief until we are provided with an amount of evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a post-Iraq invasion world .
These people have not earned our trust , they have earned our pointed and aggressive skepticism .
We must act accordingly .
Thanks for reading !
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack , which will get you an email notification for everything I publish .
My work is entirely reader-supported , so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my antics on Twitter , throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal , purchasing some of my sweet merchandise , buying my new book Poems For Rebels or my old book Woke : A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers .
For more info on who I am , where I stand , and what I ’ m trying to do with this platform , click here .
Everyone , racist platforms excluded , has my permission to republish , use or translate any part of this work ( or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in any way they like free of charge .

The Communist Party of China has been covertly sending arms to extremist Antifa militants in the United States in preparation for the civil war which is expected to take place after Joe Biden declares himself President for Life and institutes a Marxist dictatorship. The weapons shipments include rocket launchers, directed energy weapons, nunchucks and ninja throwing stars.
Unfortunately I cannot provide evidence for this shocking revelation as doing so would compromise my sources and methods, but trust me it’s definitely true and must be acted upon immediately. I recommend President Trump declare martial law without a moment’s hesitation and begin planning a military response to these Chinese aggressions.
How does this make you feel? Was your first impulse to begin scanning for evidence of the incendiary claim I made in my opening paragraph?
Murder on the SS Rosa:... Strauss, Lee Best Price: $4.48 Buy New $9.99 (as of 07:19 UTC - Details) It would be perfectly reasonable if it was. I am after all some random person on the internet whom you have probably never met, and you’ve no reason to accept any bold claim I might make on blind faith. It would make sense for you to want to see some verification of my claim, and then dismiss my claim as baseless hogwash when I failed to provide that verification.
If you’re a more regular reader, it would have also been reasonable for you to guess that I was doing a bit. But imagine if I wasn’t? Imagine if I really was claiming that the Chinese government is arming Antifa ninja warriors to kill patriotic Americans in the coming Biden Wars. How crazy would you have to be to believe what I was saying without my providing hard, verifiable evidence for my claims?
Now imagine further that this is something I’ve made false claims about many times in the past. If every few years I make a new claim about some naughty government arming Antifa super soldiers in a great communist uprising, which turns out later to have been bogus.
Well you’d dismiss me as a crackpot, wouldn’t you? I wouldn’t blame you. That would be the only reasonable response to such a ridiculous spectacle.
And yet if I were an employee of a US government agency making unproven incendiary claims about a government that isn’t aligned with the US-centralized power alliance, the entire political/media class would be parroting what I said as though it’s an established fact. Even though US government agencies have an extensive and well-documented history of lying about such things.
Trump’s former homeland security adviser: “The magnitude of this ongoing attack is hard to overstate…The Russians have had access to a number of important networks for 6 to 9 months…The access they now enjoy could be used for far more than spying.” https://t.co/ACCPVvCNZ7 — Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) December 17, 2020
Today we’re all expected to be freaking out about Russia again because Russia hacked the United States again right before a new president took office again, so now it’s very important that we support new cold war escalations from both the outgoing president and the incoming president again. We’re not allowed to see the evidence that this actually happened again, but it’s of utmost importance that we trust and support new aggressions against Russia anyway. Again. Saddled with Murder (D... Brady, Eileen Best Price: $7.99 Buy New $6.98 (as of 07:19 UTC - Details)
The New York Times has a viral op-ed going around titled “I Was the Homeland Security Adviser to Trump. We’re Being Hacked.” The article’s author Thomas P Bossert warns ominously that “the networks of the federal government and much of corporate America are compromised by a foreign nation” perpetrated by “the Russian intelligence agency known as the S.V.R., whose tradecraft is among the most advanced in the world.”
Rather than using its supreme tradecraft to interfere in the November election ensuring the victory of the president we’ve been told for years is a Russian asset by outlets like The New York Times, Bossert informs us that the SVR instead opted to hack a private American IT company called SolarWinds whose software is widely used by the US government.
“Unsuspecting customers then downloaded a corrupted version of the software, which included a hidden back door that gave hackers access to the victim’s network,” Bossert explains, saying that “The magnitude of this ongoing attack is hard to overstate.” Its magnitude is so great that Bossert says Trump must “severely punish the Russians” for perpetrating it, and cooperate with the incoming Biden team in helping to ensure that that punishment continues seamlessly between administrations.
New on MoA:
Media Blame Russia For Cyber Intrusions Without Providing Evidencehttps://t.co/LBKNDiOywm pic.twitter.com/mhvmtIqGb9 — Moon of Alabama (@MoonofA) December 16, 2020
The problem is that, as usual, we’ve been given exactly zero evidence for any of this. As Moon of Alabama explains, the only technical analysis we’ve seen of the alleged hack (courtesy of cybersecurity firm FireEye) makes no claim that Russia was responsible for it, yet the mass media are flagrantly asserting as objective, verified fact that Russia is behind this far-reaching intrusion into US government networks, citing only anonymous sources if they cite anything at all. Murder and Mendelssohn... Greenwood, Kerry Best Price: $3.86 Buy New $8.69 (as of 07:19 UTC - Details)
And of course where the media class goes so too does the barely-separate political class. Democratic Senator Dick Durbin told CNN in a recent interview that this invisible, completely unproven cyberattack constitutes “virtually a declaration of war by Russia on the United States.” Which is always soothing language to hear as the Russian government announces the development of new hypersonic missiles as part of a new nuclear arms race it attributes to US cold war escalations.
Journalist Glenn Greenwald is one of the few high-profile voices who’ve had the temerity to stick his head above the parapet and point out the fact that we have seen exactly zero evidence for these incendiary claims, for which he is of course currently being raked over the coals on Twitter.
“I know it doesn’t matter. I know it’s wrong to ask the question. I know asking the question raises grave doubts about one’s loyalties and patriotism,” Greenwald sarcastically tweeted. “But has there been any evidence publicly presented, let alone dispositive proof, that Russia is responsible for this hack?”
I know it doesn’t matter. I know it’s wrong to ask the question. I know asking the question raises grave doubts about one’s loyalties and patriotism. But has there been *any* evidence publicly presented, let alone dispositive proof, that Russia is responsible for this hack? https://t.co/nAugGeYDMh — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) December 17, 2020
“Perhaps they have information sources they can’t describe without compromising sources and methods?” chimed in Ars Technica‘s Timothy B Lee in response to Greenwald’s query, a textbook reply from establishment narrative managers whenever anyone questions where the evidence is for any of these invisible attacks on US sovereignty.
“Of course they can’t show us the evidence!” proponents of establishment Russia hysteria always say. “They’d compromise their sources and methods if they did!”
US spook agencies always say this about evidence for US spook agency claims about governments long targeted for destruction by US spook agencies. We can’t share the evidence with you because the evidence is classified. It’s secret evidence. The evidence is invisible.
Which always works out very nicely for the US spook agencies, I must say.
Hmm… America Keeps Getting Attacked By Nations It Hates In Ways Only The CIA Can See I’d like to tell you a folktale. It’s called “The Emperor’s New 9/11”.https://t.co/uduUCajFUx — Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ (@caitoz) October 24, 2020
Secret, invisible evidence is not evidence. If the public cannot see the evidence behind the claims being made by the powerful, then those claims are unproven. It would never be acceptable for anyone in power to say “This important thing with potentially world-altering consequences definitely happened, but you’ll just have to trust us because the evidence is secret.” In a post-Iraq invasion world it is orders of magnitude more unacceptable, and should therefore be dismissed until hard, verifiable evidence is provided. The Perfect 10: A Palm... O'Keefe, Eric Best Price: $7.99 Buy New $18.95 (as of 07:19 UTC - Details)
Isn’t it interesting how all the Pearl Harbors and 9/11s of our day are completely invisible to the public? We can’t see cyber-intrusions for ourselves like we could see fallen buildings and smoking naval bases; they’re entirely hidden from our view. Not only are they entirely hidden from our view, the evidence that they happened is kept secret from us as well. And the mass media just treat this as normal and fine. Government agencies with an extensive history of lying are allowed to make completely unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims about governments long targeted by those same government agencies, and the institutions responsible for informing the public about what’s going on in the world simply repeat it as fact.
Sure it’s possible that Russia hacked the US. It’s possible that the US government has been in contact with extraterrestrials, too. It’s possible that the Chinese government is covertly arming Antifa samurai in preparation for a civil war. But we do not imbue these things with the power of belief until we are provided with an amount of evidence that rises to the level required in a post-Iraq invasion world.
These people have not earned our trust, they have earned our pointed and aggressive skepticism. We must act accordingly.
_____________________________________
Image via Pixabay
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my sweet merchandise, buying my new book Poems For Rebels or my old book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2


lewrockwell--2020-12-22--Government, Not Coronavirus, Is Killing Small Businesses

A video of a confrontation between Ventura County , California health officials and restaurant owner Anton Van Happen has gone viral .
The health officials were ordering Mr. Van Happen to close his business because he allegedly violated California ’ s ban on outdoor dining .
Mr. Van Happen asked the health officials if the government will pay his employees and his rent while his business is indefinitely closed .
Mr. Van Happen is hardly the only small business owner worried about how to pay bills during the lockdowns .
Many small businesses operate on a narrow profit margin , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shut down or limit the number of customers they can serve is a virtual death sentence .
The lockdowns have already caused as many as 200,000 small businesses to permanently close .
Lockdowns , by shrinking the number of employers , lead to long-term unemployment or lower wages for many workers .
Ross-Simons 2-Tone Dou ... Buy New $ 111.75 While governments have terrorized small businesses , they have typically deemed the big chain stores “ essential businesses ” so they can remain open .
The lockdowns are thus another government policy that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their smaller competitors .
The benefits big businesses get from the lockdowns — including fewer competitors , more customers , and a job market with more workers competing for fewer jobs — may explain why many big businesses are not fighting the lockdowns .
Instead , most big retail chains are requiring their workers and customers to wear masks .
Many big businesses may soon deny service to those who refuse to receive a Covid vaccine .
One would think that progressives who claim to oppose policies that benefit big corporations like WalMart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lockdowns .
Sadly , even many progressives are unquestioningly parroting the Covid propaganda and demonizing those who dissent .
MiaBella Solid 18K Gol ... Buy New $ 34.95 By slowing down the development of herd immunity among the population , the lockdowns could put those truly at risk in greater danger .
Lockdowns have also had negative effects such as increases in drug and alcohol abuse and increases in domestic violence .
Meanwhile , many schoolchildren are deprived of the opportunity to interact with their teachers and their peers .
Instead , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ virtual learning.
” Resistance to Covid tyranny is growing as more people figure out that lockdowns and mandates are both unnecessary and harmful .
This resistance was largely started by small business owners faced with a choice between obeying the government or making sure they , and their employees , can feed their families .
Small business owners have been leaders in recent anti-lockdown protests across America .
Eventually the resistance will grow to the point where the politicians will be forced to either double down on authoritarianism or admit the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , those of us who know the truth must resist the Covid tyranny until government officials no longer terrorize small businesses for the crime of serving willing consumers .
The Best of Ron Paul , MD

A video of a confrontation between Ventura County, California health officials and restaurant owner Anton Van Happen has gone viral. The health officials were ordering Mr. Van Happen to close his business because he allegedly violated California’s ban on outdoor dining. Mr. Van Happen asked the health officials if the government will pay his employees and his rent while his business is indefinitely closed.
Mr. Van Happen is hardly the only small business owner worried about how to pay bills during the lockdowns. Many small businesses operate on a narrow profit margin, so being forced to “temporarily” shut down or limit the number of customers they can serve is a virtual death sentence.
The lockdowns have already caused as many as 200,000 small businesses to permanently close. Lockdowns, by shrinking the number of employers, lead to long-term unemployment or lower wages for many workers. Ross-Simons 2-Tone Dou... Buy New $111.75 (as of 06:41 UTC - Details)
While governments have terrorized small businesses, they have typically deemed the big chain stores “essential businesses” so they can remain open. The lockdowns are thus another government policy that gives big businesses a competitive advantage over their smaller competitors.
The benefits big businesses get from the lockdowns — including fewer competitors, more customers, and a job market with more workers competing for fewer jobs — may explain why many big businesses are not fighting the lockdowns. Instead, most big retail chains are requiring their workers and customers to wear masks. Many big businesses may soon deny service to those who refuse to receive a Covid vaccine.
One would think that progressives who claim to oppose policies that benefit big corporations like WalMart, Target, and Amazon would oppose the lockdowns. Sadly, even many progressives are unquestioningly parroting the Covid propaganda and demonizing those who dissent. MiaBella Solid 18K Gol... Buy New $34.95 (as of 06:41 UTC - Details)
By slowing down the development of herd immunity among the population, the lockdowns could put those truly at risk in greater danger. Lockdowns have also had negative effects such as increases in drug and alcohol abuse and increases in domestic violence. Meanwhile, many schoolchildren are deprived of the opportunity to interact with their teachers and their peers. Instead, these children are subjected to the fraud of “virtual learning.”
Resistance to Covid tyranny is growing as more people figure out that lockdowns and mandates are both unnecessary and harmful. This resistance was largely started by small business owners faced with a choice between obeying the government or making sure they, and their employees, can feed their families. Small business owners have been leaders in recent anti-lockdown protests across America.
Eventually the resistance will grow to the point where the politicians will be forced to either double down on authoritarianism or admit the lockdowns were a mistake. Either way, those of us who know the truth must resist the Covid tyranny until government officials no longer terrorize small businesses for the crime of serving willing consumers.
The Best of Ron Paul, MD