lewrockwell--2020-11-09--There’s Another Option Besides Hunkering Down and Bugging Out: Nomadic Living

Lots of folks in the prepper world believe there are only two options when it comes to survival : bugging out or hunkering down .
In fact , there are loads of gray areas that include a combination of those strategies as well as altogether different tactics .
It ’ s not usually fun to be stuck in an exceptionally long car ride , but when I went to Bosnia a few years ago , I was riding in a vehicle with Toby Cowern and a whole bunch of luggage for hours .
The conversation we had during that ride @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ People think there ’ s only bugging in and bugging out , but there ’ s a third option – being nomadic.
” Nomad Capitalist : How ... Henderson , Andrew Best Price : $ 18.71 Buy New $ 11.99 As a person who has always loved travel , I craved new adventures and immersion in other cultures .
But before this conversation , it seemed very much at odds with my self-defined identity of being a prepper .
But Toby ’ s comment sparked inspiration and I ’ ve spent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world , making location decisions based on circumstances , learning new skills and languages , and becoming more resilient and adaptable than ever before .
The nomadic lifestyle isn ’ t for everyone .
Normally I ’ d put a disclaimer like this at the end of the article but in a valiant attempt to quell the chorus of people who read 3 paragraphs then vigorously object , question my sanity , and tell me they ’ re never coming back to my website again , I ’ ll write this segment first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ few suitcases and a couple of dogs isn ’ t the life for everyone .
Many people don ’ t enjoy going to their local Walmart , much less a third world country or gallivanting through Europe .
And that is absolutely fine .
Just as I wouldn ’ t recommend homesteading and raising all your own food for everyone , neither would I recommend a nomadic lifestyle for everyone .
But just because it isn ’ t for you doesn ’ t make it inherently flawed , bad , stupid , wrong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you want to throw at it .
Different does not always equal bad .
In fact , I think a combination of many skills and lifestyle factors can help you be more flexible and give you a lot more options , depending on the situation that comes your way .
Being a nomad , bugging out , and being a refugee are all different .
Next , let me clarify that being nomadic and bugging out aren ’ t the same thing as being a refugee .
I often see people say in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come hell , high water , or an alien invasion , they ’ re hunkering down because they refuse to be refugees .
These folks see bugging out as becoming a “ refugee ” so I ’ m sure the idea of being deliberately nomadic is even more undesirable when looking at it without all the details .
Leaving an unsafe location does not necessarily make you a refugee .
There are many other reasons a person might relocate for survival/preparedness purposes .
If you lived in downtown Portland or Seattle , where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for months , and you had the means to relocate to a different place until things settled down ( assuming they do settle down ) why on earth would you stay in a place where your building could be set on fire on any given night ?
If your primary home was hit by a natural disaster and recovery was likely to take months , would you stay there in a place without power and running water for all that time if you could just as easily rent an apartment elsewhere ?
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was undergoing an economic collapse ?
I knew someone from Athens , Greece who rented a home outside the country during the worst part of the financial crisis , when supplies were difficult to acquire .
Someone who opts to relocate when things are beginning to look sketchy usually has resources as well .
That could mean a secondary location , the money to rent and travel to a home elsewhere , financial security , or a job that could easily be done remotely .
What is bugging out ?
Bugging out is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a secondary location because your primary location is not safe .
Sometimes that location might be one that you own ( the infamous “ bug out lodge ” ) or it might be a hotel , a campground , or a friend ’ s house outside of the danger zone .
Most of the time when folks bug out , it ’ s with the intention of returning to their primary location when things are safe again .
There are all sorts of reasons one might need to evacuate : wildfires , hurricanes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on and on .
Bugging out is usually a deliberate action undertaken with a plan .
A well-prepared person will have a few routes planned , some supplies in their car , and a destination in mind .
They ’ ll generally have some resources – either supplies , money , or a secondary location .
If you want more detailed information about bugging out , go here .
Expat Secrets : How To ... Thorup , Mikkel Best Price : $ 17.00 Buy New $ 17.79 What is being a refugee ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Jose has written about it here , and Selco was also a refugee from his home for a period of time during the Balkan War .
It isn ’ t a fun life .
You are often treated badly by those where you end up because their resources are stretched then and they feel like you ’ re there for a handout .
Unwanted guests and unwilling hosts are a bad combination for all involved .
In many cases , refugees have few to no resources .
Many times , refugees are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ homes were destroyed in battles .
They might leave with only the clothes on their backs .
At The Museum of Genocide in Bosnia , one display that particularly caught my eye and broke my heart .
A mother had been bathing her two children when they had to flee and she wrapped one in a towel and one in a table cloth .
These children had nothing else to wear until other refugees – who also had very little – managed to put together clothing and shoes for them .
People who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also have no destination in mind aside from “ anywhere that is safer than here.
” Then there are people who are nomadic .
Someone who is deliberately mobile is in a yet different situation .
There are many different ways to live a nomadic lifestyle , but the basic idea is that you don ’ t have one fixed primary location .
For example , lots of folks living the van life or who are full-time RV-ers are also preppers .
Having all of your things in a giant rolling bug-out bag @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a primary location and bug-out location , while keeping you mobile at the same time .
It means you can more easily evacuate ALL your possessions in the event your current location is starting to look sketchy .
Not only that , you ’ ve probably heard of “ digital nomads , ” a term used in the online business world for folks who have an occupation that allows them to work from any place with an internet connection and who choose to frequently relocate as a way to see the world .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ days .
I have a bit of essential gear , my clothing , and I rent furnished places for a few months at a time in different locations .
Here ’ s an example of how this extreme mobility can apply to the survival world .
Shortly before COVID erupted , I was in Europe and had been living the digital nomad lifestyle with great enjoyment .
I had to return to North America for a funeral that January and then ended up canceling my return flight and settling in the United States @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can see , all three of these ideologies are different .
I ’ ve been living a fully nomadic lifestyle for the past couple of years .
I was always a person who enjoyed moving and acquiring different kinds of experiences .
Even before I was officially “ nomadic ” I lived and prepped in cities , in the suburbs , in a semi-off-grid cabin in the Algonquin Forest in Ontario , Canada , and a little homestead in the mountains of California where I raised veggies , chickens , ducks , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of my daughters became independent adults , I decided to live a little differently .
I sold a lot of my stuff , divvied up a lot of my preps between my girls , and rented a small storage unit for the things I didn ’ t want to part with .
Since this time , I ’ ve lived in five countries and visited five more .
Not only was this a dramatic change in lifestyle , but it was also a big shift in mindset .
I went from being a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and shampoo stashed away to a person living out of a couple of suitcases with a very different emergency kit .
I went from confidently knowing my way around to finding myself in entirely different settings every couple of months in places where I didn ’ t even speak the language .
I went from having friends and family within a quick drive to being on foot or learning new transportation modes while making new contacts .
I went from raising my own food to navigating entirely new supply chains .
How to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Bob Best Price : $ 7.58 Buy New $ 7.45 Let ’ s just say there was a wee bit of culture shock when I first started out .
When I look back at that point , I ’ m reminded of how Selco talks about the importance of adapting to new rules quickly .
While my “ new rules ” weren ’ t matters of life and death , they were certainly matters of convenience and comfort .
And in each place I visited , these “ new rules ” were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I had been .
However , after two or three new locations , I realized that I was adapting faster and figuring things out more efficiently .
Here ’ s how I set up a few preps in a short-term location .
I have learned how to communicate with people when we have no mutually intelligible languages , and even how to have a friendly laugh with strangers via a strange mix of miming , Google Translate apps , and pointing .
I can orient myself in new places very quickly .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries don ’ t have the same conveniences that the United States does .
( And there ’ s a high price you pay for those conveniences – they may very well kill you one day if you ’ re not careful . )
All of this exotic travel probably sounds like it costs the moon , but it really depends how you do it .
If you get hotels and room service everywhere you go , of course , it ’ s decadently priced .
But if you ’ re smart , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outrageously expensive .
I spend far less money now than I did when I maintained a stationary home in the United States .
I rent places a month to a few months at a time that are furnished and utilities inclusive and most places have an otherwise lower cost of living .
I ’ m so much more adaptable than I was before .
I wrote a little more about my newfound adaptability here : When you take your 2 pieces of luggage and relocate regularly , you become good at adapting quickly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it ’ s very easy to get set in our ways and to demand a certain level of comfort .
( Who among us has “ my chair ” ? )
We get used to sleeping in the same bed with the same pillows and the same comforter , so much so that it can become difficult to sleep anywhere else .
We have our favorite mug washed and ready to go for the following morning ’ s coffee .
We have our favorite store that contains our favorite brands of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ habit .
And there ’ s nothing wrong with that – habits can help us become better , stronger , healthier people when our habits are wise ones .
But it ’ s also good to shake things up a little from time to time .
Every new place I went to had different stores with different food items .
The local customs , restaurants , and apartments all varied .
Each time , I got a little bit better at adapting faster .
I can sleep anywhere .
My business is such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place I have a decent wifi signal .
I picked up some important phrases , like please , thank you , how much , and where ’ s the bathroom as soon as possible once I arrived in a new place .
I learned a new currency in nearly every country I visited and wrote down the formula to quickly convert it to USD so that I could understand what I was spending .
I can eat whatever gets put in front of me and enjoy nearly all of it , even when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different .
I quickly learned that when in another country , it ’ s impossible to rigidly stick to your ways and still have a good time .
This helped me pare down to my most important needs – wifi , a plug adapter , a safe place to stay , a Berkey water filtration bottle , and appropriate clothing for my setting .
Everything else can be acquired quickly and easily… …Moving into someone else ’ s apartment is often an exercise in discomfort – after all , there ’ s no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ideal by your standards .
Much like Goldilocks , I ’ ve found beds that were too hard , too soft , and just right .
I ’ ve slept on a sofa that was more comfortable than the bed which was in the rental .
I have developed the ability to get comfortable enough to sleep just about anywhere – and that ’ s something that could come in handy .
As well , unfamiliarity itself can be uncomfortable .
When you ’ re someplace totally unfamiliar , with different restaurants , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last thing you feel is “ comfort.
” You need to put in the effort to figure everything out and you have to get a general feel for the area .
Some people find this puts them constantly on edge and unable to focus .
It ’ s good training to learn to deal with discomfort while still staying sharp .
The urban survival course I took with Selco and Toby in Croatia underlined this repeatedly – you need to learn to be uncomfortable and function anyway .
( source ) I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the past two years , and I ’ m nonplussed by things that I once would have found anywhere from mildly inconvenient to incredibly stressful .
I recently mentioned something offhand to my daughter about “ not having water that day ” and she pointed out that I went 24 hours without running water and didn ’ t even find it important enough to mention in our daily chat .
Every place I ’ ve gone , I ’ ve learned something I can apply to either preparedness or frugality .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Greek , some Serbo-Croatian , and Spanish .
Wherever I happen to land , I ’ m confident I can roll with it in a much wider variety of situations than before .
Pros and cons of a nomadic lifestyle in terms of preparedness One of the biggest things I ’ ve learned during my nomadic years is that being prepared isn ’ t just about how much stuff you ’ ve been able to acquire .
It ’ s about the things you learn , the ability to make personal connections , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the things you need .
But no lifestyle is “ perfect ” in terms of survival .
Here are some of the ways a nomadic lifestyle is beneficial to your preparedness efforts .
• You can acquire supplies quickly .
Once you ’ ve moved around a few times you learn how to stock up fast with whatever supplies are available at your current location .
• You can go where the danger is not .
As long as you go soon enough , you can relocate to a place that is less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a person who is nomadic is not tied to only a primary and secondary location .
They have multiple options .
I have contacts with apartments in countries around the world who I can reach out to by email or text if I need a place to land .
Many of these are people from whom I ’ ve already rented .
• You learn to read the area faster .
Going back to that discussion of “ the new rules ” when you are constantly relocating , you become a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in with the local customs .
This can help you learn to hide in plain sight .
• You are comfortable with discomfort .
I can sleep on basically any surface , eat whatever is offered to me , and adapt to different standards of cleanliness with ease .
• If you can ’ t find what you need , you can create it .
I can cobble together what I need in a massive variety of situations .
I ’ ve made my own “ cold medicine ” with local brandy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make a reasonably effective electrolyte beverage from those little packets of salt and sugar at fast-food restaurants .
I can create a water purification system out of easily located items and I can create an emergency kit just about anywhere .
• Bugging out is super-easy .
If I had to bail quickly , bugging out is easier than ever before .
I have my luggage , and I have a backpack .
If I had an emergency in which speed was of the essence , my international emergency kit and my laptop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be out the door .
• You learn to get by with less stuff .
I don ’ t have lots of clothing .
I don ’ t have a wide variety of foods .
I don ’ t have 20 different light sources from which to choose .
I have one or two options for all necessities and this has helped me to greatly simplify .
This article talks about my usual gear .
But it ’ s not all rose petals , sunshine , and exotic beaches .
There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t have the same tight-knit local network .
I ’ ve lived in places in which I had a thriving personal network .
I ’ ve written before about how it isn ’ t always what you know , it ’ s who you know .
We ’ ve produced a webinar on the importance of community .
If you are nomadic , it ’ s a lot harder to build this type of network and you have to be extremely valuable to fit in fast .
• You can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know those folks who plan to just head off to an idyllic farm and live off the land when it hits the fan ?
You know how I often say that ’ s a horrible idea ?
Building a working homestead can take years of experience and hard labor .
You can ’ t really start something like that after it all goes to heck .
You need to start it while you still have a grocery store for backup when your garden gets eaten by the local wildlife and when your chickens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how to keep them safe from predators .
This stuff takes time .
• You can ’ t have years and years worth of supplies .
Before I made the switch to nomadic living , I had years ’ worth of supplies in every possible category put back .
I can ’ t really drag around a whole one-year supply of food with me now , nor can I have large investment supplies like generators and the like .
• You may be limited with defense options .
If you ’ re considering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s very likely you will not be able to walk around with a gun stuffed into your jeans .
For some folks this is absolutely a no-go – they are not willing to adapt to the use of different defense items within the bounds of local laws , which change by location .
• You may not be comfortable .
I mentioned this as a pro but it is also a con .
For some folks , comfort and familiarity are a must .
They can ’ t relax without it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ s a very personal choice .
There are , of course , more pros and cons , but these are a few to consider .
Reprinted with permission from The Organic Prepper .
The Best of Daisy Luther

Lots of folks in the prepper world believe there are only two options when it comes to survival: bugging out or hunkering down. In fact, there are loads of gray areas that include a combination of those strategies as well as altogether different tactics.
It’s not usually fun to be stuck in an exceptionally long car ride, but when I went to Bosnia a few years ago, I was riding in a vehicle with Toby Cowern and a whole bunch of luggage for hours. The conversation we had during that ride ended up being life-changing.
Toby said, “People think there’s only bugging in and bugging out, but there’s a third option – being nomadic.”
Nomad Capitalist: How ... Henderson, Andrew Best Price: $18.71 Buy New $11.99 (as of 03:47 UTC - Details) As a person who has always loved travel, I craved new adventures and immersion in other cultures. But before this conversation, it seemed very much at odds with my self-defined identity of being a prepper. But Toby’s comment sparked inspiration and I’ve spent the last two years wandering around the world, making location decisions based on circumstances, learning new skills and languages, and becoming more resilient and adaptable than ever before.
The nomadic lifestyle isn’t for everyone.
Normally I’d put a disclaimer like this at the end of the article but in a valiant attempt to quell the chorus of people who read 3 paragraphs then vigorously object, question my sanity, and tell me they’re never coming back to my website again, I’ll write this segment first.
Wandering around the world with a few suitcases and a couple of dogs isn’t the life for everyone. Many people don’t enjoy going to their local Walmart, much less a third world country or gallivanting through Europe. And that is absolutely fine. Just as I wouldn’t recommend homesteading and raising all your own food for everyone, neither would I recommend a nomadic lifestyle for everyone.
But just because it isn’t for you doesn’t make it inherently flawed, bad, stupid, wrong, cowardly, or any other criticism you want to throw at it. Different does not always equal bad. In fact, I think a combination of many skills and lifestyle factors can help you be more flexible and give you a lot more options, depending on the situation that comes your way.
Being a nomad, bugging out, and being a refugee are all different.
Next, let me clarify that being nomadic and bugging out aren’t the same thing as being a refugee. I often see people say in the comments that no matter what, come hell, high water, or an alien invasion, they’re hunkering down because they refuse to be refugees. These folks see bugging out as becoming a “refugee” so I’m sure the idea of being deliberately nomadic is even more undesirable when looking at it without all the details.
Leaving an unsafe location does not necessarily make you a refugee.
There are many other reasons a person might relocate for survival/preparedness purposes. If you lived in downtown Portland or Seattle, where the heated protests have been going on for months, and you had the means to relocate to a different place until things settled down (assuming they do settle down) why on earth would you stay in a place where your building could be set on fire on any given night? If your primary home was hit by a natural disaster and recovery was likely to take months, would you stay there in a place without power and running water for all that time if you could just as easily rent an apartment elsewhere? What if you were in a country that was undergoing an economic collapse? I knew someone from Athens, Greece who rented a home outside the country during the worst part of the financial crisis, when supplies were difficult to acquire.
Someone who opts to relocate when things are beginning to look sketchy usually has resources as well. That could mean a secondary location, the money to rent and travel to a home elsewhere, financial security, or a job that could easily be done remotely.
What is bugging out?
Bugging out is generally about leaving your primary location for a secondary location because your primary location is not safe. Sometimes that location might be one that you own (the infamous “bug out lodge”) or it might be a hotel, a campground, or a friend’s house outside of the danger zone. Most of the time when folks bug out, it’s with the intention of returning to their primary location when things are safe again. There are all sorts of reasons one might need to evacuate: wildfires, hurricanes, chemical spills – the list goes on and on.
Bugging out is usually a deliberate action undertaken with a plan. A well-prepared person will have a few routes planned, some supplies in their car, and a destination in mind. They’ll generally have some resources – either supplies, money, or a secondary location. If you want more detailed information about bugging out, go here. Expat Secrets: How To ... Thorup, Mikkel Best Price: $17.00 Buy New $17.79 (as of 03:47 UTC - Details)
What is being a refugee?
I know people who have been refugees. Jose has written about it here, and Selco was also a refugee from his home for a period of time during the Balkan War. It isn’t a fun life. You are often treated badly by those where you end up because their resources are stretched then and they feel like you’re there for a handout. Unwanted guests and unwilling hosts are a bad combination for all involved.
In many cases, refugees have few to no resources. Many times, refugees are those fleeing war-torn countries or people whose homes were destroyed in battles. They might leave with only the clothes on their backs. At The Museum of Genocide in Bosnia, one display that particularly caught my eye and broke my heart. A mother had been bathing her two children when they had to flee and she wrapped one in a towel and one in a table cloth. These children had nothing else to wear until other refugees – who also had very little – managed to put together clothing and shoes for them.
People who have no option but to flee may also have no destination in mind aside from “anywhere that is safer than here.”
What is nomadic preparedness?
Then there are people who are nomadic. Someone who is deliberately mobile is in a yet different situation.
There are many different ways to live a nomadic lifestyle, but the basic idea is that you don’t have one fixed primary location.
For example, lots of folks living the van life or who are full-time RV-ers are also preppers. Having all of your things in a giant rolling bug-out bag gives you many of the advantages of a primary location and bug-out location, while keeping you mobile at the same time. It means you can more easily evacuate ALL your possessions in the event your current location is starting to look sketchy.
Not only that, you’ve probably heard of “digital nomads,” a term used in the online business world for folks who have an occupation that allows them to work from any place with an internet connection and who choose to frequently relocate as a way to see the world. That’s what I do these days. I have a bit of essential gear, my clothing, and I rent furnished places for a few months at a time in different locations.
Here’s an example of how this extreme mobility can apply to the survival world. Shortly before COVID erupted, I was in Europe and had been living the digital nomad lifestyle with great enjoyment. I had to return to North America for a funeral that January and then ended up canceling my return flight and settling in the United States during the first lockdown.
As you can see, all three of these ideologies are different.
What I’ve learned
I’ve been living a fully nomadic lifestyle for the past couple of years. I was always a person who enjoyed moving and acquiring different kinds of experiences. Even before I was officially “nomadic” I lived and prepped in cities, in the suburbs, in a semi-off-grid cabin in the Algonquin Forest in Ontario, Canada, and a little homestead in the mountains of California where I raised veggies, chickens, ducks, and a couple of goats.
Once both of my daughters became independent adults, I decided to live a little differently. I sold a lot of my stuff, divvied up a lot of my preps between my girls, and rented a small storage unit for the things I didn’t want to part with. Since this time, I’ve lived in five countries and visited five more.
Not only was this a dramatic change in lifestyle, but it was also a big shift in mindset. I went from being a person with years’ worth of food and shampoo stashed away to a person living out of a couple of suitcases with a very different emergency kit. I went from confidently knowing my way around to finding myself in entirely different settings every couple of months in places where I didn’t even speak the language. I went from having friends and family within a quick drive to being on foot or learning new transportation modes while making new contacts. I went from raising my own food to navigating entirely new supply chains. How to Live In a Car, ... Wells, Bob Best Price: $7.58 Buy New $7.45 (as of 03:47 UTC - Details)
Let’s just say there was a wee bit of culture shock when I first started out. When I look back at that point, I’m reminded of how Selco talks about the importance of adapting to new rules quickly. While my “new rules” weren’t matters of life and death, they were certainly matters of convenience and comfort. And in each place I visited, these “new rules” were always different than the last place that I had been. However, after two or three new locations, I realized that I was adapting faster and figuring things out more efficiently. Here’s how I set up a few preps in a short-term location.
I have learned how to communicate with people when we have no mutually intelligible languages, and even how to have a friendly laugh with strangers via a strange mix of miming, Google Translate apps, and pointing. I can orient myself in new places very quickly. I became far more fit because most other countries don’t have the same conveniences that the United States does. (And there’s a high price you pay for those conveniences – they may very well kill you one day if you’re not careful.)
All of this exotic travel probably sounds like it costs the moon, but it really depends how you do it. If you get hotels and room service everywhere you go, of course, it’s decadently priced. But if you’re smart, it doesn’t have to be outrageously expensive. I spend far less money now than I did when I maintained a stationary home in the United States. I rent places a month to a few months at a time that are furnished and utilities inclusive and most places have an otherwise lower cost of living.
I’m so much more adaptable than I was before.
I wrote a little more about my newfound adaptability here:
When you take your 2 pieces of luggage and relocate regularly, you become good at adapting quickly. When we’re at home, it’s very easy to get set in our ways and to demand a certain level of comfort. (Who among us has “my chair”?) We get used to sleeping in the same bed with the same pillows and the same comforter, so much so that it can become difficult to sleep anywhere else. We have our favorite mug washed and ready to go for the following morning’s coffee. We have our favorite store that contains our favorite brands of our favorite products. We become creatures of habit. And there’s nothing wrong with that – habits can help us become better, stronger, healthier people when our habits are wise ones. But it’s also good to shake things up a little from time to time. Every new place I went to had different stores with different food items. The local customs, restaurants, and apartments all varied. Each time, I got a little bit better at adapting faster. I can sleep anywhere. My business is such that I can work remotely in any place I have a decent wifi signal. I picked up some important phrases, like please, thank you, how much, and where’s the bathroom as soon as possible once I arrived in a new place. I learned a new currency in nearly every country I visited and wrote down the formula to quickly convert it to USD so that I could understand what I was spending. I can eat whatever gets put in front of me and enjoy nearly all of it, even when I thought I had ordered something completely different. I quickly learned that when in another country, it’s impossible to rigidly stick to your ways and still have a good time. This helped me pare down to my most important needs – wifi, a plug adapter, a safe place to stay, a Berkey water filtration bottle, and appropriate clothing for my setting. Everything else can be acquired quickly and easily… …Moving into someone else’s apartment is often an exercise in discomfort – after all, there’s no place like home, where everything is ideal by your standards. Much like Goldilocks, I’ve found beds that were too hard, too soft, and just right. I’ve slept on a sofa that was more comfortable than the bed which was in the rental. I have developed the ability to get comfortable enough to sleep just about anywhere – and that’s something that could come in handy. As well, unfamiliarity itself can be uncomfortable. When you’re someplace totally unfamiliar, with different restaurants, stores, products, and people the last thing you feel is “comfort.” You need to put in the effort to figure everything out and you have to get a general feel for the area. Some people find this puts them constantly on edge and unable to focus. It’s good training to learn to deal with discomfort while still staying sharp. The urban survival course I took with Selco and Toby in Croatia underlined this repeatedly – you need to learn to be uncomfortable and function anyway.(source)
I’ve become extremely adaptable and resilient over the past two years, and I’m nonplussed by things that I once would have found anywhere from mildly inconvenient to incredibly stressful. I recently mentioned something offhand to my daughter about “not having water that day” and she pointed out that I went 24 hours without running water and didn’t even find it important enough to mention in our daily chat.
Every place I’ve gone, I’ve learned something I can apply to either preparedness or frugality. I’ve picked up a little bit of Greek, some Serbo-Croatian, and Spanish. Wherever I happen to land, I’m confident I can roll with it in a much wider variety of situations than before.
Pros and cons of a nomadic lifestyle in terms of preparedness
One of the biggest things I’ve learned during my nomadic years is that being prepared isn’t just about how much stuff you’ve been able to acquire. It’s about the things you learn, the ability to make personal connections, and the speed and efficiency of acquiring the things you need. But no lifestyle is “perfect” in terms of survival.
Here are some of the ways a nomadic lifestyle is beneficial to your preparedness efforts.
You can acquire supplies quickly . Once you’ve moved around a few times you learn how to stock up fast with whatever supplies are available at your current location.
. Once you’ve moved around a few times you learn how to stock up fast with whatever supplies are available at your current location. You can go where the danger is not. As long as you go soon enough, you can relocate to a place that is less risky. Since this varies by disaster, a person who is nomadic is not tied to only a primary and secondary location. They have multiple options. I have contacts with apartments in countries around the world who I can reach out to by email or text if I need a place to land. Many of these are people from whom I’ve already rented.
As long as you go soon enough, you can relocate to a place that is less risky. Since this varies by disaster, a person who is nomadic is not tied to only a primary and secondary location. They have multiple options. I have contacts with apartments in countries around the world who I can reach out to by email or text if I need a place to land. Many of these are people from whom I’ve already rented. You learn to read the area faster. Going back to that discussion of “the new rules” when you are constantly relocating, you become a lot faster at reading the situation and fitting in with the local customs. This can help you learn to hide in plain sight.
Going back to that discussion of “the new rules” when you are constantly relocating, you become a lot faster at reading the situation and fitting in with the local customs. This can help you learn to hide in plain sight. You are comfortable with discomfort. I can sleep on basically any surface, eat whatever is offered to me, and adapt to different standards of cleanliness with ease.
I can sleep on basically any surface, eat whatever is offered to me, and adapt to different standards of cleanliness with ease. If you can’t find what you need, you can create it. I can cobble together what I need in a massive variety of situations. I’ve made my own “cold medicine” with local brandy, ibuprofen, and antihistamines. I can make a reasonably effective electrolyte beverage from those little packets of salt and sugar at fast-food restaurants. I can create a water purification system out of easily located items and I can create an emergency kit just about anywhere.
I can cobble together what I need in a massive variety of situations. I’ve made my own “cold medicine” with local brandy, ibuprofen, and antihistamines. I can make a reasonably effective electrolyte beverage from those little packets of salt and sugar at fast-food restaurants. I can create a water purification system out of easily located items and I can create an emergency kit just about anywhere. Bugging out is super-easy. If I had to bail quickly, bugging out is easier than ever before. I have my luggage, and I have a backpack. If I had an emergency in which speed was of the essence, my international emergency kit and my laptop could be grabbed in seconds and I could be out the door.
If I had to bail quickly, bugging out is easier than ever before. I have my luggage, and I have a backpack. If I had an emergency in which speed was of the essence, my international emergency kit and my laptop could be grabbed in seconds and I could be out the door. You learn to get by with less stuff. I don’t have lots of clothing. I don’t have a wide variety of foods. I don’t have 20 different light sources from which to choose. I have one or two options for all necessities and this has helped me to greatly simplify. This article talks about my usual gear.
But it’s not all rose petals, sunshine, and exotic beaches. There are some cons as well.
You don’t have the same tight-knit local network. I’ve lived in places in which I had a thriving personal network. I’ve written before about how it isn’t always what you know, it’s who you know. We’ve produced a webinar on the importance of community. If you are nomadic, it’s a lot harder to build this type of network and you have to be extremely valuable to fit in fast.
I’ve lived in places in which I had a thriving personal network. I’ve written before about how it isn’t always what you know, it’s who you know. We’ve produced a webinar on the importance of community. If you are nomadic, it’s a lot harder to build this type of network and you have to be extremely valuable to fit in fast. You can’t build a thriving homestead . You know those folks who plan to just head off to an idyllic farm and live off the land when it hits the fan? You know how I often say that’s a horrible idea? Building a working homestead can take years of experience and hard labor. You can’t really start something like that after it all goes to heck. You need to start it while you still have a grocery store for backup when your garden gets eaten by the local wildlife and when your chickens die because you didn’t know how to keep them safe from predators. This stuff takes time.
. You know those folks who plan to just head off to an idyllic farm and live off the land when it hits the fan? You know how I often say that’s a horrible idea? Building a working homestead can take years of experience and hard labor. You can’t really start something like that after it all goes to heck. You need to start it while you still have a grocery store for backup when your garden gets eaten by the local wildlife and when your chickens die because you didn’t know how to keep them safe from predators. This stuff takes time. You can’t have years and years worth of supplies. Before I made the switch to nomadic living, I had years’ worth of supplies in every possible category put back. I can’t really drag around a whole one-year supply of food with me now, nor can I have large investment supplies like generators and the like.
Before I made the switch to nomadic living, I had years’ worth of supplies in every possible category put back. I can’t really drag around a whole one-year supply of food with me now, nor can I have large investment supplies like generators and the like. You may be limited with defense options. If you’re considering going outside the United States, it’s very likely you will not be able to walk around with a gun stuffed into your jeans. For some folks this is absolutely a no-go – they are not willing to adapt to the use of different defense items within the bounds of local laws, which change by location.
If you’re considering going outside the United States, it’s very likely you will not be able to walk around with a gun stuffed into your jeans. For some folks this is absolutely a no-go – they are not willing to adapt to the use of different defense items within the bounds of local laws, which change by location. You may not be comfortable. I mentioned this as a pro but it is also a con. For some folks, comfort and familiarity are a must. They can’t relax without it. They would be miserable constantly changing settings. It’s a very personal choice.
There are, of course, more pros and cons, but these are a few to consider.
Reprinted with permission from The Organic Prepper.
The Best of Daisy Luther


lewrockwell--2020-11-09--Crucial Provisional Ballots: Why Pennsylvania (and This Election) Isn’t Over

There ’ s big news breaking here in Pennsylvania , and most of the national media seems to be unaware .
It ’ s the matter of Pennsylvania ’ s crucial ( but heretofore largely ignored ) provisional ballots , which could be decisive in pushing Donald Trump back into the lead in the state , or at least triggering a statewide recount .
Before considering those details , I want to respond to the many inquiries I ’ ve received from readers wondering how it ’ s possible that Joe Biden could have pulled into the lead in Pennsylvania @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and they ’ re right to be dubious of what has transpired .
If It ’ s Not Clos ... Hugh Hewitt Best Price : $ 1.35 Buy New $ 8.99 Yes , Joe Biden has somehow surpassed Donald Trump in Pennsylvania , but don ’ t blame voters in Pittsburgh , nor maybe even voters in Philadelphia .
Frankly , it ’ s hard to figure who to blame .
It ’ s somewhat baffling .
Of those mail-in ballots that started to be counted on Wednesday , and that allowed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down to Donald Trump by a massive ( and seemingly insurmountable ) margin of roughly a half million votes , Biden would have needed probably at least 80 % of those remaining mail-in ballots .
That was my own estimate , which I wrote about here on Thursday .
Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien estimated on Wednesday afternoon that Biden would have to get 78 % of outstanding votes to win Pennsylvania .
He noted ( as I did ) that while there were outstanding votes in Biden counties like Philadelphia and Montgomery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in York , Butler , and various Trump counties .
Stepien thus confidently asserted , “ we are declaring a victory in Pennsylvania.
” So did Donald Trump , and understandably so .
Personally , I do not see how Joe Biden could have gotten that 80 % , even as mail-in ballots have in fact been significantly favorable to Biden throughout the country .
Consider this striking number : Biden was actually barely getting 80 % in Philadelphia County .
Indeed , Trump still has almost 20 % of the Philadelphia County @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I thought he ’ d be lucky to get 10 % ) .
He also has nearly 40 % of Allegheny County ( Pittsburgh ’ s county ) votes .
Many of the other mail-in counties remaining were Republican-Trump counties , including my own ( Mercer County , where Trump has 62 % of the vote ) and counties like Beaver ( huge fracking area , 58 % for Trump ) and even large GOP counties like York ( likewise 62 % for Trump ) .
( Click here for the county @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we ’ ve watched the overall Pennsylvania vote flip to Biden over the last 72 hours , it ’ s as if Donald Trump hasn ’ t gotten even a few hundred thousand new votes , whereas Biden ’ s total soars by the millions .
I think Joe Biden would have been lucky to get 60-70 % of all the remaining mail-in ballots .
I find it almost inconceivable that he got 80 % .
THE HAMMER is the Key ... Jones , Alan Buy New $ 4.99 Donald Trump is right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least demand double-checking , given not just Philadelphia ’ s ugly history of political corruption , and his suspicion of the general susceptibility for mail-in-ballot fraud , but given the implausibility of what has happened in Pennsylvania .
The Trump campaign was absolutely justified in believing it had Pennsylvania in the bag ( see my column on that ) .
What has somehow transpired since late Tuesday night does not seem plausible .
Consider , too : Donald Trump has 400,000 more votes in Pennsylvania in 2020 than he received in 2016 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state .
The enthusiasm for Trump here is off the charts , in contrast to no enthusiasm for Biden .
If Joe Biden has truly received that many votes in Pennsylvania , then it must be via pure , unbridled , ferocious anti-Trump hatred .

There’s big news breaking here in Pennsylvania, and most of the national media seems to be unaware. It’s the matter of Pennsylvania’s crucial (but heretofore largely ignored) provisional ballots, which could be decisive in pushing Donald Trump back into the lead in the state, or at least triggering a statewide recount.
Before considering those details, I want to respond to the many inquiries I’ve received from readers wondering how it’s possible that Joe Biden could have pulled into the lead in Pennsylvania. It’s an excellent question, and they’re right to be dubious of what has transpired.
If It’s Not Clos... Hugh Hewitt Best Price: $1.35 Buy New $8.99 (as of 03:48 UTC - Details) Yes, Joe Biden has somehow surpassed Donald Trump in Pennsylvania, but don’t blame voters in Pittsburgh, nor maybe even voters in Philadelphia. Frankly, it’s hard to figure who to blame. It’s somewhat baffling. Of those mail-in ballots that started to be counted on Wednesday, and that allowed Joe Biden an astonishing comeback after being down to Donald Trump by a massive (and seemingly insurmountable) margin of roughly a half million votes, Biden would have needed probably at least 80% of those remaining mail-in ballots. That was my own estimate, which I wrote about here on Thursday. Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien estimated on Wednesday afternoon that Biden would have to get 78% of outstanding votes to win Pennsylvania. He noted (as I did) that while there were outstanding votes in Biden counties like Philadelphia and Montgomery, there were also many votes left in York, Butler, and various Trump counties. Stepien thus confidently asserted, “we are declaring a victory in Pennsylvania.” So did Donald Trump, and understandably so.
Personally, I do not see how Joe Biden could have gotten that 80%, even as mail-in ballots have in fact been significantly favorable to Biden throughout the country. Consider this striking number: Biden was actually barely getting 80% in Philadelphia County. Indeed, Trump still has almost 20% of the Philadelphia County votes (that’s surprisingly good, I thought he’d be lucky to get 10%). He also has nearly 40% of Allegheny County (Pittsburgh’s county) votes. Many of the other mail-in counties remaining were Republican-Trump counties, including my own (Mercer County, where Trump has 62% of the vote) and counties like Beaver (huge fracking area, 58% for Trump) and even large GOP counties like York (likewise 62% for Trump). (Click here for the county breakdown.)
And yet, as we’ve watched the overall Pennsylvania vote flip to Biden over the last 72 hours, it’s as if Donald Trump hasn’t gotten even a few hundred thousand new votes, whereas Biden’s total soars by the millions. I think Joe Biden would have been lucky to get 60-70% of all the remaining mail-in ballots. I find it almost inconceivable that he got 80%. THE HAMMER is the Key ... Jones, Alan Buy New $4.99 (as of 08:40 UTC - Details)
Donald Trump is right to be suspicious, and to at least demand double-checking, given not just Philadelphia’s ugly history of political corruption, and his suspicion of the general susceptibility for mail-in-ballot fraud, but given the implausibility of what has happened in Pennsylvania. The Trump campaign was absolutely justified in believing it had Pennsylvania in the bag (see my column on that). What has somehow transpired since late Tuesday night does not seem plausible.
Consider, too: Donald Trump has 400,000 more votes in Pennsylvania in 2020 than he received in 2016, and yet he may still lose the state. The enthusiasm for Trump here is off the charts, in contrast to no enthusiasm for Biden. If Joe Biden has truly received that many votes in Pennsylvania, then it must be via pure, unbridled, ferocious anti-Trump hatred.
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-11-09--Wait Just a Minute! Some Very Good News May Be Coming

Like many , I spent the last few nights waking up at 2:03 A.M. , no reason , then looking at my phone for news , any news , that might be positive for President Trump .
I survived on Rush , Bongino , Mark Levin .
When the news continued to be ugly , I even checked in on ridiculous bloggers promising that ballots were watermarked and D.J .
( our household name for a president we love ) was actually launching a sting on the Deep State .
Enough already .
Stop the madness .
Hey , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I have some level of critical thought .
If there is such pessimism in my tribe , I am not going along .
So today , I started to dig into the numbers , and as I did , I fought my confirmation bias at every step .
The Book of Bidenisms : ... Books , DJAZ Buy New $ 6.99 I realized that I , like millions of others , had been numbed into despondency by the overwhelming press , media , social media push to certify President-Elect Biden .
( I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see how repellent it is . )
Hey guys , this thing is not only not over ; it is scary for Biden .
I mean really scary , and most of all , the media know it .
Thus , the rush to get everyone in line with the narrative that a 78-year-old , early-dementia former V.P.
, who could not draw a crowd larger than a dozen , just beat D.J .
in a fair election .
Start with Pennsylvania .
Biden , as of this writing , is at 290 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Defender in Chief : Don ... Yoo , John Buy New $ 25.99 I read the Justice Alito opinion , and it is pretty clear that he wants the after election night at 8:00 P.M. votes separated for a reason .
Biden is going to lose at the Supreme Court , and they know it .
Four justices already said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court can not adjust voting rules .
A new arrival , Justice Barrett , says she is there to apply the rules in the Constitution .
OK , wan na @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 8:00 P.M. ballots , and Biden loses Pennsylvania .
Biden 270 .
Let ’ s visit Nevada .
I have lots of friends in California who have condos in Nevada to evade state taxes .
There are not a couple of people doing this ; there are tens of thousands .
Everyone knows it , and California seeks them out .
Our old pal Harry Reid knows it as well , and he apparently has them voting in droves in this election .
Probably not a big D.J .
constituency .
Within 72 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ team found , validated over 3,500 of them .
I do not suspect that Trump ’ s people stopped counting .
The Power of Positive ... Peale , Dr. Norman Vincent Best Price : $ 2.72 Buy New $ 5.95 Every one of these is a ballot reduction for Biden Nevada , as of now , is well within reach for DJ and the Trump team — particularly when the California crowd is reduced .
And a few of them may testify since a false vote is a very bad thing , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bigger story here .
Remember where we are , people .
Biden is at 270 after a highly probable Supreme Court decision ( read Alito and concurring opinions ) .

Like many, I spent the last few nights waking up at 2:03 A.M., no reason, then looking at my phone for news, any news, that might be positive for President Trump. I survived on Rush, Bongino, Mark Levin. When the news continued to be ugly, I even checked in on ridiculous bloggers promising that ballots were watermarked and D.J. (our household name for a president we love) was actually launching a sting on the Deep State.
Enough already. Stop the madness.
Hey, I have a degree in statistics, and I have some level of critical thought. If there is such pessimism in my tribe, I am not going along.
So today, I started to dig into the numbers, and as I did, I fought my confirmation bias at every step.
The Book of Bidenisms:... Books, DJAZ Buy New $6.99 (as of 06:03 UTC - Details) I realized that I, like millions of others, had been numbed into despondency by the overwhelming press, media, social media push to certify President-Elect Biden. (I put that in there so you can see how repellent it is.)
Hey guys, this thing is not only not over; it is scary for Biden. I mean really scary, and most of all, the media know it. Thus, the rush to get everyone in line with the narrative that a 78-year-old, early-dementia former V.P., who could not draw a crowd larger than a dozen, just beat D.J. in a fair election.
Process that for a moment.
Start with Pennsylvania. Biden, as of this writing, is at 290 electoral votes. Pennsylvania is 20. Defender in Chief: Don... Yoo, John Buy New $25.99 (as of 04:22 UTC - Details)
I read the Justice Alito opinion, and it is pretty clear that he wants the after election night at 8:00 P.M. votes separated for a reason. Biden is going to lose at the Supreme Court, and they know it. Four justices already said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot adjust voting rules. A new arrival, Justice Barrett, says she is there to apply the rules in the Constitution. OK, wanna bet she does?
Remove the after 8:00 P.M. ballots, and Biden loses Pennsylvania. Biden 270.
Let’s visit Nevada. I have lots of friends in California who have condos in Nevada to evade state taxes. There are not a couple of people doing this; there are tens of thousands. Everyone knows it, and California seeks them out.
Our old pal Harry Reid knows it as well, and he apparently has them voting in droves in this election. Probably not a big D.J. constituency. Within 72 hours of the election, the Trump team found, validated over 3,500 of them. I do not suspect that Trump’s people stopped counting. The Power of Positive ... Peale, Dr. Norman Vincent Best Price: $2.72 Buy New $5.95 (as of 04:30 UTC - Details)
Every one of these is a ballot reduction for Biden
Nevada, as of now, is well within reach for DJ and the Trump team — particularly when the California crowd is reduced. And a few of them may testify since a false vote is a very bad thing, with jail time if convicted. Maybe a bigger story here.
Remember where we are, people. Biden is at 270 after a highly probable Supreme Court decision (read Alito and concurring opinions).
Lose Nevada, lose the election.
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-11-10--A President’s Refusal To Accept the Election Results

The original union of American states was a voluntary union , not a coerced one held together by violence , mass killing , and terrorism as with say , the Soviet Union .
The citizens of the “ free and independent states , ” as they are called in the Declaration of Independence , sent delegates from their communities to the constitutional convention that resulted in the delegation of eighteen specific powers from them ( Article 1 , Section 8 ) – the citizens of the independent states – to the federal government for their benefit and for their mutual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be the agent of the citizens of the states , who everyone acknowledged as the principals .
Three states – New York , Rhode Island , and Virginia – specifically wrote in their ratification documents that these delegated powers “ may be resumed by the people ” of those states at any time , and for any reason determined by them , if they were to conclude that the federal government was behaving in a way that was not “ necessary to their happiness.
” Since they were accepted into the union , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states had the exact same rights to secede from the union .
Secession was assumed by no one to be dependent on permission by any other state or states .
They took their own language about the “ free and independent states ” in the Declaration of Independence seriously .
The Problem with Linco ... DiLorenzo , Thomas J .
Buy New $ 29.99 The New York ratification document of July 26 , 1788 says : “ That the Powers of Government [ in Article 1 , Section 8 ] may be reassumed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become necessary to their Happiness , that every Power , Jurisdiction and right , which is not by the said Constitution clearly delegated to the Congress of the United States , or the departments of the Government thereof , remains to the People of the several States , or to their respective State Governments to whom they may have granted the same .
.
.
” The May 29 , 1790 Ratification document of Rhode Island was very similar : “ That the powers of government may be reassumed by the people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happiness .
.
.
” And , the June 26 , 1788 Virginia Ratification document reads : “ .
.
.
the powers granted under the Constitution being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression and that every power not granted thereby remains with them and at their will .
.
.
” This of course is why there was no talk of forcing New Englanders back into the union under threats of waging total war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , bombing and burning its cities into smoldering ruins , destroying their economy with naval blockades , and launching a full-scale invasion when the New England Federalists plotted to secede for fourteen years after the election of Thomas Jefferson as president .
Secession ( from the British empire ) was “ the ” principle of the American Revolution , declared Massachusetts Senator Timothy Pickering , George Washington ’ s secretary of state and secretary of war and the leader of the 1801-1814 New England secession movement .
The movement culminated with the Hartford @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to remain in the union after all and attempt to politically dominate and plunder the South with tariffs instead of seceding from it .
It Wasn ’ t About ... Mitcham Jr. , Samuel W. Best Price : $ 21.39 Buy New $ 22.99 By 1860 the population of the North was more than double that of the South , and the lopsided congressional representation that that created emboldened the North to plunder the South with the heavily-protectionist Morrill Tariff , passed by the House of Representatives during the 1859-60 sesion , before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on mostly manufactured goods , which more than doubled the average tariff rate from 15 % to 33 % , was heavily discriminatory against the agricultural South .
Then , in his first inaugural address , Abraham Lincoln threatened “ invasion ” and “ bloodshed ” in any state that refused to pay this newly-doubled federal tax .
( In the same address he assured the world that he had no intentions whatsoever to disturb Southern slavery , and even endorsed the Corwin Amendment to the Constitution , which had passed the Republican-controlled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prohibited the federal government from ever interfering with slavery ) .
In his first inaugural address Jefferson Davis announced that the South was an agricultural society that traded with the entire world , that the Confederacy intended to pursue a policy of free trade with all the countries of the world , and that it would defend itself from Northern invaders who intended to stop them from doing so .
So when the Southern states seceded , they did so in full knowledge of the New York , Rhode Island , and Virginia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all the states .
Like the New England Federalists of the past generation , each Southern state sent delegates from each community to their respective secession conventions to vote on whether to “ reassume ” the powers delegated to the central government or not .
Virginia first on April 4 , 1861 voted to remain in the union , but then when Lincoln launched an invasion of all the Southern states the vote was reversed , 130-22 in favor of secession .
The South Carolina convention voted unanimously for secession with 169 delegates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other words , the votes taken at the Southern secession conventions , like the votes taken at the 1814 Hartford secession convention , were fully in keeping with the Constitution and the state ratification documents .
The citizens of the states were the masters , not the servants , of their own central government .
There would never have been a federal constitution had the founders believed that the union was what Murray Rothbard once called a “ one-way venus flytrap ” from which there could neve be any escape no matter how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the future .
American Secession : Th ... F.H .
Buckley Best Price : $ 15.64 Buy New $ 16.22 The Republican party , led by Abraham Lincoln refused to accept the results of these legal and constitutional elections and committed the very definition of treason by waging total war on the entire Southern population for four long years .
Understanding that there was always a danger that a future government could become tyrannical , the founders defined treason in Article 1 , Section 3 of the Constitution as : “ Treason against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in levying War against them , or in adhering to their Enemies , giving them Aid and Comfort.
” The key words here are “ their ” and “ them.
” The words “ United States ” in all the founding documents is in the plural , signifying the free and independent states and not something called “ the United States government in Washington , D.C. ” Levying war against “ them ” meant against any state or states , which of course exactly what Lincoln did when he refused to abide by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conventions .
Assuring the world that his invasion and waging total war against his own country had nothing to do with slavery but with “ saving the union , ” Lincoln ’ s war resulted in as many as 850,000 war-related deaths according to the latest research ; the effective destruction of the American system of federalism ; the establishment of totalitarian tyranny in the Northern states during the war with the nearly total abolition of civil liberties there ; and the failure to do what all the rest of the world – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about slavery and end it peacefully .
There is a lot of talk of another Civil War in America these days .
The reason for such talk is all of the violence that has been organized by what is effectively the military wing of the Democrat National Committee – Antifa and Black Lives Matter .
They have rioted , looted , committed serial acts of arson , and even murdered .
No one expects conservatives to behave in such a manner should demented Joe Biden prevail .
If President Trump succeeds with his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote fraud that has taken place , the Democrats will no longer be dancing in the streets guzzling champagne .
They will escalate the kind of violence that they have orchestrated for the past six months or so , and it will likely be orders of magnitude worse .
They will have become the new Party of Lincoln .
The Best of Thomas DiLorenzo

The original union of American states was a voluntary union, not a coerced one held together by violence, mass killing, and terrorism as with say, the Soviet Union. The citizens of the “free and independent states,” as they are called in the Declaration of Independence, sent delegates from their communities to the constitutional convention that resulted in the delegation of eighteen specific powers from them (Article 1, Section 8) – the citizens of the independent states – to the federal government for their benefit and for their mutual advantage. The federal government was to be the agent of the citizens of the states, who everyone acknowledged as the principals.
Three states – New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia – specifically wrote in their ratification documents that these delegated powers “may be resumed by the people” of those states at any time, and for any reason determined by them, if they were to conclude that the federal government was behaving in a way that was not “necessary to their happiness.” Since they were accepted into the union, it was assumed by everyone that all states had the exact same rights to secede from the union. Secession was assumed by no one to be dependent on permission by any other state or states. They took their own language about the “free and independent states” in the Declaration of Independence seriously. The Problem with Linco... DiLorenzo, Thomas J. Buy New $29.99 (as of 11:50 UTC - Details)
The New York ratification document of July 26, 1788 says: “That the Powers of Government [in Article 1, Section 8] may be reassumed by the People, whensoever it shall become necessary to their Happiness, that every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by the said Constitution clearly delegated to the Congress of the United States, or the departments of the Government thereof, remains to the People of the several States, or to their respective State Governments to whom they may have granted the same . . .”
The May 29, 1790 Ratification document of Rhode Island was very similar: “That the powers of government may be reassumed by the people, whensoever it shall become necessary to their happiness . . .” And, the June 26, 1788 Virginia Ratification document reads: “. . . the powers granted under the Constitution being derived from the People of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression and that every power not granted thereby remains with them and at their will . . . ”
This of course is why there was no talk of forcing New Englanders back into the union under threats of waging total war on the civilian population of the region, bombing and burning its cities into smoldering ruins, destroying their economy with naval blockades, and launching a full-scale invasion when the New England Federalists plotted to secede for fourteen years after the election of Thomas Jefferson as president. Secession (from the British empire) was “the” principle of the American Revolution, declared Massachusetts Senator Timothy Pickering, George Washington’s secretary of state and secretary of war and the leader of the 1801-1814 New England secession movement. The movement culminated with the Hartford Secession convention of 1814 when they decided to remain in the union after all and attempt to politically dominate and plunder the South with tariffs instead of seceding from it.
It Wasn’t About ... Mitcham Jr., Samuel W. Best Price: $21.39 Buy New $22.99 (as of 04:44 UTC - Details) By 1860 the population of the North was more than double that of the South, and the lopsided congressional representation that that created emboldened the North to plunder the South with the heavily-protectionist Morrill Tariff, passed by the House of Representatives during the 1859-60 sesion, before any state had seceded. The tariff on mostly manufactured goods, which more than doubled the average tariff rate from 15% to 33%, was heavily discriminatory against the agricultural South. Then, in his first inaugural address, Abraham Lincoln threatened “invasion” and “bloodshed” in any state that refused to pay this newly-doubled federal tax. (In the same address he assured the world that he had no intentions whatsoever to disturb Southern slavery, and even endorsed the Corwin Amendment to the Constitution, which had passed the Republican-controlled House and Senate, that would have prohibited the federal government from ever interfering with slavery).
In his first inaugural address Jefferson Davis announced that the South was an agricultural society that traded with the entire world, that the Confederacy intended to pursue a policy of free trade with all the countries of the world, and that it would defend itself from Northern invaders who intended to stop them from doing so.
So when the Southern states seceded, they did so in full knowledge of the New York, Rhode Island, and Virginia ratification declarations that had been assumed by all the states. Like the New England Federalists of the past generation, each Southern state sent delegates from each community to their respective secession conventions to vote on whether to “reassume” the powers delegated to the central government or not. Virginia first on April 4, 1861 voted to remain in the union, but then when Lincoln launched an invasion of all the Southern states the vote was reversed, 130-22 in favor of secession. The South Carolina convention voted unanimously for secession with 169 delegates; and so it went.
In other words, the votes taken at the Southern secession conventions, like the votes taken at the 1814 Hartford secession convention, were fully in keeping with the Constitution and the state ratification documents. The citizens of the states were the masters, not the servants, of their own central government. There would never have been a federal constitution had the founders believed that the union was what Murray Rothbard once called a “one-way venus flytrap” from which there could neve be any escape no matter how tyrannical the central government might become in the future. American Secession: Th... F.H. Buckley Best Price: $15.64 Buy New $16.22 (as of 10:56 UTC - Details)
The Republican party, led by Abraham Lincoln refused to accept the results of these legal and constitutional elections and committed the very definition of treason by waging total war on the entire Southern population for four long years. Understanding that there was always a danger that a future government could become tyrannical, the founders defined treason in Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution as: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” The key words here are “their” and “them.” The words “United States” in all the founding documents is in the plural, signifying the free and independent states and not something called “the United States government in Washington, D.C.” Levying war against “them” meant against any state or states, which of course exactly what Lincoln did when he refused to abide by the votes taken at the Southern secession conventions. Assuring the world that his invasion and waging total war against his own country had nothing to do with slavery but with “saving the union,” Lincoln’s war resulted in as many as 850,000 war-related deaths according to the latest research; the effective destruction of the American system of federalism; the establishment of totalitarian tyranny in the Northern states during the war with the nearly total abolition of civil liberties there; and the failure to do what all the rest of the world – including the Northern U.S. states – did about slavery and end it peacefully.
There is a lot of talk of another Civil War in America these days. The reason for such talk is all of the violence that has been organized by what is effectively the military wing of the Democrat National Committee – Antifa and Black Lives Matter. They have rioted, looted, committed serial acts of arson, and even murdered. No one expects conservatives to behave in such a manner should demented Joe Biden prevail. If President Trump succeeds with his lawsuits against the blatantly obvious, massive vote fraud that has taken place, the Democrats will no longer be dancing in the streets guzzling champagne. They will escalate the kind of violence that they have orchestrated for the past six months or so, and it will likely be orders of magnitude worse. They will have become the new Party of Lincoln.
The Best of Thomas DiLorenzo


lewrockwell--2020-11-10--Democrats Must Not Be Allowed To Get Away With Their Criminal Election Fraud

They control polling places , they stop votes when their candidate ’ s behind , and then in the wee hours of the morning , in the dark of night , the stealing starts .
— Rod Blagojevich , former Democrat Governor of Illinois There has been a massive and coordinated effort to steal this election from we the People of the United States of America to delegitimize and destroy votes for Donald Trump .
To manufacture votes for Joe Biden .
They ’ ve done it in every way imaginable , from having dead people vote in record numbers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exist only for voting for Biden .
— Sidney Powell , former Appellate Section Chief for the Western and then the Northern District of Texas By 10 o ’ clock on November 3rd , it had become apparent that Donald Trump was cruising toward a comfortable victory in the Electoral College .
With Texas and Florida having gone his way , he also enjoyed sizable leads in crucial battleground states .
As Trump was headed toward his seemingly inevitable victory , all of a sudden something very strange began happening .
A number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ held solid margins inexplicably suspended their counts .
Never in memory had a key swing state stopped its counting process before the presidential winner was known .
For several states to have done this at the same time is completely unprecedented .
# DELETED : Big Tech & rsq ... Bokhari , Allum Buy New $ 28.00 As the counting stretched into the days ahead and reports of gross irregularities kept pouring in , two things became obvious .
First , Trump had handily won the Electoral College by legally cast ballots .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a carefully pre-planned fraud to steal the election .
And the audacity of this fraud is truly unprecedented in both its effrontery and magnitude .
The Democrats ’ strategy going into election day should be clear to everyone by now .
Their plan was to hijack the election by implementing the following stratagem : In crucial swing and battleground states we will keep counting votes until we can accurately assess which candidate is going to win ( election operatives apparently know this with near certainty when between 70-85 % of cast ballots have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is on the path to win , we will simply proceed with the count and declare Biden the winner .
If Biden is on a track to lose , we will suspend the count for the night .
We will then proceed to manufacture ballots in the interim to enable him to win .
If Trump ’ s lead is too large , we will draw out the counting process over the next several days .
As the vote drags on , we shall keep finding new votes until we have at last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the top .
The beauty of this plan is that you do not need to exercise complete control over the electoral process in the entire state .
In order to succeed , you only need to control key precincts from which you can generate enough votes to offset Trump ’ s lead from the rest of the state .
Such precincts would be located in densely populated democrat-controlled urban areas such as Atlanta , Philadelphia and Detroit .
These precincts had been run and controlled by the Democrat machinery for many decades @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people have had extensive experience with election fraud on the local and state levels .
This time the Democrats conspired to up their game and steal a presidential contest .
The Democratic apparatus was able to pull this scam off nearly flawlessly and things unfolded almost exactly as they had hoped .
If you still have hard time believing that a national political party could be capable of such criminal knavery , you should listen very carefully to what Rod Blagojevich had to say the other day .
You may remember that Rod @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Illinois who was convicted of public corruption and sentenced to 14 years in federal prison ( of which he served 8 ) .
Having been part of the Democrat establishment in a swing state for many years , he knows intimately how the unscrupulous Democrat electioneering machinery works .
In his interview with NewsMax , Blagojevich described exactly how the fraud took place on the night of the election day .
“ Coming out of the Democratic Chicago political establishment , I know how they operate , ” he said .
He then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hasson , Peter J .
Best Price : $ 15.00 Buy New $ 21.63 “ They control polling places , they stop votes when their candidate ’ s behind , and then in the wee hours of the morning , in the dark of night , the stealing starts.
” Please pay close attention to these words and ponder them carefully .
We have all seen with our own eyes the abnormal sequence of events : the vote count suspended in multiple states on the night of November 3rd .
Here we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bowels of the corrupt Democrat apparatus telling us exactly how it happened the way it did .
Even though some fraud is part of every election , what makes this fraud extraordinary is its scope and sheer impudence .
It was not just a couple of corrupt blue precincts here and there cheating in a local race .
This was a synchronized operation across several battleground states to steal the highest office in the land .
But let us go back to Rod Blagojevich who had this to say about electoral fraud : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in big Democrat-controlled cities like Chicago – my hometown – Philadelphia , to do precisely what they ’ re doing now .
And we ’ ve seen that in big numbers , in unprecedented numbers , in this election in Michigan , and in Philadelphia .
It ’ s outrageous .
I ’ ve never seen it on such a magnitude , because this is an indication of just how widespread it is , how deep it is , and I don ’ t think it ’ s confined to Philadelphia .
My @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chicago Democratic politics , my instincts tell me , it ’ s going on in Atlanta , it ’ s going on in Detroit , going on in Milwaukee , it ’ s going on in Las Vegas.
” This colossal crime has been coordinated by various elements of the Democrat Party apparatus .
There must have been cooperation between the Biden campaign and the local Democrat operatives who run the pivotal precincts in crucial places in Philadelphia , Detroit , Atlanta , Las Vegas .
The operation was also likely getting help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and local Democratic parties in the battleground states .
It would not be surprising if the effort was also aided by Deep State elements in the Federal government .
It has been shown , for example , that some CIA operatives whose specialty is the orchestration of color revolutions around the world were working on behalf of the Biden campaign .
The Art of the Steal : ... Norman , Adrian Best Price : $ 10.94 Buy New $ 14.95 President Trump won this election .
Had he not won , the Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ count , then drag it out until they had enough votes to declare Biden the winner .
Trump must not concede to this outrage under any circumstances .
Doing so would be not only sell out those who voted for him , but it would also turn the nation over to the neo-Marxist hard left that is responsible for this travesty .
President Trump should use all the tools and means at his disposal to try to expose this villainy .
Among other things , he should order the Department of Justice and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ matter .
Individuals in these agencies resisting or sabotaging this effort must be replaced by people who are willing to carry out lawful directives of the President of the United States .
President Trump and the good people of this nation are in the struggle of their lives .
We must not let the hard left destroy this country without doing everything we can to stop the great crime they are trying to perpetrate .
The Best of Vasko Kohlmayer

They control polling places, they stop votes when their candidate’s behind, and then in the wee hours of the morning, in the dark of night, the stealing starts.
— Rod Blagojevich, former Democrat Governor of Illinois
There has been a massive and coordinated effort to steal this election from we the People of the United States of America to delegitimize and destroy votes for Donald Trump. To manufacture votes for Joe Biden. They’ve done it in every way imaginable, from having dead people vote in record numbers, to absolutely fraudulently creating ballots that exist only for voting for Biden.
— Sidney Powell, former Appellate Section Chief for the Western and then the Northern District of Texas
By 10 o’clock on November 3rd, it had become apparent that Donald Trump was cruising toward a comfortable victory in the Electoral College. With Texas and Florida having gone his way, he also enjoyed sizable leads in crucial battleground states. As Trump was headed toward his seemingly inevitable victory, all of a sudden something very strange began happening. A number of key swing states in which Trump held solid margins inexplicably suspended their counts. Never in memory had a key swing state stopped its counting process before the presidential winner was known. For several states to have done this at the same time is completely unprecedented. #DELETED: Big Tech&rsq... Bokhari, Allum Buy New $28.00 (as of 04:48 UTC - Details)
As the counting stretched into the days ahead and reports of gross irregularities kept pouring in, two things became obvious. First, Trump had handily won the Electoral College by legally cast ballots. Second, the Democrats were engaged in a carefully pre-planned fraud to steal the election. And the audacity of this fraud is truly unprecedented in both its effrontery and magnitude.
The Democrats’ strategy going into election day should be clear to everyone by now. Their plan was to hijack the election by implementing the following stratagem:
In crucial swing and battleground states we will keep counting votes until we can accurately assess which candidate is going to win (election operatives apparently know this with near certainty when between 70-85% of cast ballots have been processed). If our candidate is on the path to win, we will simply proceed with the count and declare Biden the winner. If Biden is on a track to lose, we will suspend the count for the night. We will then proceed to manufacture ballots in the interim to enable him to win. If Trump’s lead is too large, we will draw out the counting process over the next several days. As the vote drags on, we shall keep finding new votes until we have at last generated a sufficient number to put Biden over the top.
The beauty of this plan is that you do not need to exercise complete control over the electoral process in the entire state. In order to succeed, you only need to control key precincts from which you can generate enough votes to offset Trump’s lead from the rest of the state. Such precincts would be located in densely populated democrat-controlled urban areas such as Atlanta, Philadelphia and Detroit. These precincts had been run and controlled by the Democrat machinery for many decades. Corrupted to the core, these people have had extensive experience with election fraud on the local and state levels. This time the Democrats conspired to up their game and steal a presidential contest.
The Democratic apparatus was able to pull this scam off nearly flawlessly and things unfolded almost exactly as they had hoped. If you still have hard time believing that a national political party could be capable of such criminal knavery, you should listen very carefully to what Rod Blagojevich had to say the other day. You may remember that Rod Blagojevich is a former Democratic governor of Illinois who was convicted of public corruption and sentenced to 14 years in federal prison (of which he served 8). Having been part of the Democrat establishment in a swing state for many years, he knows intimately how the unscrupulous Democrat electioneering machinery works. In his interview with NewsMax, Blagojevich described exactly how the fraud took place on the night of the election day. “Coming out of the Democratic Chicago political establishment, I know how they operate,” he said. He then continued: The Manipulators: Face... Hasson, Peter J. Best Price: $15.00 Buy New $21.63 (as of 05:20 UTC - Details)
“They control polling places, they stop votes when their candidate’s behind, and then in the wee hours of the morning, in the dark of night, the stealing starts.”
Please pay close attention to these words and ponder them carefully. We have all seen with our own eyes the abnormal sequence of events: the vote count suspended in multiple states on the night of November 3rd. Here we have a former high-level insider straight from the bowels of the corrupt Democrat apparatus telling us exactly how it happened the way it did.
Even though some fraud is part of every election, what makes this fraud extraordinary is its scope and sheer impudence. It was not just a couple of corrupt blue precincts here and there cheating in a local race. This was a synchronized operation across several battleground states to steal the highest office in the land.
But let us go back to Rod Blagojevich who had this to say about electoral fraud:
“It’s a time-honored tradition in big Democrat-controlled cities like Chicago – my hometown – Philadelphia, to do precisely what they’re doing now. And we’ve seen that in big numbers, in unprecedented numbers, in this election in Michigan, and in Philadelphia. It’s outrageous. I’ve never seen it on such a magnitude, because this is an indication of just how widespread it is, how deep it is, and I don’t think it’s confined to Philadelphia. My instincts, again, coming out of Chicago Democratic politics, my instincts tell me, it’s going on in Atlanta, it’s going on in Detroit, going on in Milwaukee, it’s going on in Las Vegas.”
This colossal crime has been coordinated by various elements of the Democrat Party apparatus. There must have been cooperation between the Biden campaign and the local Democrat operatives who run the pivotal precincts in crucial places in Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Las Vegas. The operation was also likely getting help and support from the Democrat National Committee and local Democratic parties in the battleground states. It would not be surprising if the effort was also aided by Deep State elements in the Federal government. It has been shown, for example, that some CIA operatives whose specialty is the orchestration of color revolutions around the world were working on behalf of the Biden campaign. The Art of the Steal: ... Norman, Adrian Best Price: $10.94 Buy New $14.95 (as of 03:37 UTC - Details)
President Trump won this election. Had he not won, the Democrats would not have had to suspend the count, then drag it out until they had enough votes to declare Biden the winner. Trump must not concede to this outrage under any circumstances. Doing so would be not only sell out those who voted for him, but it would also turn the nation over to the neo-Marxist hard left that is responsible for this travesty.
President Trump should use all the tools and means at his disposal to try to expose this villainy. Among other things, he should order the Department of Justice and the FBI to open investigations into the matter. Individuals in these agencies resisting or sabotaging this effort must be replaced by people who are willing to carry out lawful directives of the President of the United States.
President Trump and the good people of this nation are in the struggle of their lives. We must not let the hard left destroy this country without doing everything we can to stop the great crime they are trying to perpetrate.
The Best of Vasko Kohlmayer