lewrockwell--2020-09-08--The Stalinist Trial Of Julian Assange. Whose Side Are You On?

When I first met Julian Assange more than ten years ago , I asked him why he had started WikiLeaks .
He replied : “ Transparency and accountability are moral issues that must be the essence of public life and journalism.
” I had never heard a publisher or an editor invoke morality in this way .
Assange believes that journalists are the agents of people , not power : that we , the people , have a right to know about the darkest secrets of those who claim to act in our name .
If the powerful lie to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know .
If they say one thing in private and the opposite in public , we have the right to know .
If they conspire against us , as Bush and Blair did over Iraq , then pretend to be democrats , we have the right to know .
It is this morality of purpose that so threatens the collusion of powers that want to plunge much of the world into war and wants to bury Julian alive in Trumps fascist America .
Freedom Next Time : Res ... Pilger , John Best @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10.55 In 2008 , a top secret US State Department report described in detail how the United States would combat this new moral threat .
A secretly-directed personal smear campaign against Julian Assange would lead to “ exposure [ and ] criminal prosecution ” .
The aim was to silence and criminalise WikiLeaks and its founder .
Page after page revealed a coming war on a single human being and on the very principle of freedom of speech and freedom of thought , and democracy .
The imperial shock troops would be those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hitters of the so-called mainstream , especially the “ liberals ” who mark and patrol the perimeters of dissent .
And that is what happened .
I have been a reporter for more than 50 years and I have never known a smear campaign like it : the fabricated character assassination of a man who refused to join the club : who believed journalism was a service to the public , never to those above .
Assange shamed his persecutors .
He produced scoop after scoop .
He exposed the fraudulence of wars @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nature of America ’ s wars , the corruption of dictators , the evils of Guantanamo .
He forced us in the West to look in the mirror .
He exposed the official truth-tellers in the media as collaborators : those I would call Vichy journalists .
None of these imposters believed Assange when he warned that his life was in danger : that the “ sex scandal ” in Sweden was a set up and an American hellhole was the ultimate destination .
And he was right , and repeatedly right .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Price : $ 6.76 Buy New $ 10.75 The extradition hearing in London this week is the final act of an Anglo-American campaign to bury Julian Assange .
It is not due process .
It is due revenge .
The American indictment is clearly rigged , a demonstrable sham .
So far , the hearings have been reminiscent of their Stalinist equivalents during the Cold War .
Today , the land that gave us Magna Carta , Great Britain , is distinguished by the abandonment of its own sovereignty in allowing a malign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vicious psychological torture of Julian – a form of torture , as Nils Melzer , the UN expert has pointed out , that was refined by the Nazis because it was most effective in breaking its victims .
Every time I have visited Assange in Belmarsh prison , I have seen the effects of this torture .
When I last saw him , he had lost more than 10 kilos in weight ; his arms had no muscle .
Incredibly , his wicked sense of humour was intact .
As for Assange @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only a cringeing cowardice as its government has secretly conspired against its own citizen who ought to be celebrated as a national hero .
Not for nothing did George W. Bush anoint the Australian prime minister his “ deputy sheriff ” .
It is said that whatever happens to Julian Assange in the next three weeks will diminish if not destroy freedom of the press in the West .
But which press ?
The Guardian ?
The BBC , The New York Times , the Jeff Bezos Washington Post ?
In Defense of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ... Best Price : $ 19.98 Buy New $ 23.00 No , the journalists in these organisations can breathe freely .
The Judases on the Guardian who flirted with Julian , exploited his landmark work , made their pile then betrayed him , have nothing to fear .
They are safe because they are needed .
Freedom of the press now rests with the honourable few : the exceptions , the dissidents on the internet who belong to no club , who are neither rich nor laden with Pulitzers , but produce fine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like Julian Assange .
Meanwhile , it is our responsibility to stand by a true journalist whose sheer courage ought to be inspiration to all of us who still believe that freedom is possible .
I salute him .
The Best of John Pilger

When I first met Julian Assange more than ten years ago, I asked him why he had started WikiLeaks. He replied: “Transparency and accountability are moral issues that must be the essence of public life and journalism.”
I had never heard a publisher or an editor invoke morality in this way. Assange believes that journalists are the agents of people, not power: that we, the people, have a right to know about the darkest secrets of those who claim to act in our name.
If the powerful lie to us, we have the right to know. If they say one thing in private and the opposite in public, we have the right to know. If they conspire against us, as Bush and Blair did over Iraq, then pretend to be democrats, we have the right to know.
It is this morality of purpose that so threatens the collusion of powers that want to plunge much of the world into war and wants to bury Julian alive in Trumps fascist America. Freedom Next Time: Res... Pilger, John Best Price: $1.49 Buy New $10.55 (as of 03:25 UTC - Details)
In 2008, a top secret US State Department report described in detail how the United States would combat this new moral threat. A secretly-directed personal smear campaign against Julian Assange would lead to “exposure [and] criminal prosecution”.
The aim was to silence and criminalise WikiLeaks and its founder. Page after page revealed a coming war on a single human being and on the very principle of freedom of speech and freedom of thought, and democracy.
The imperial shock troops would be those who called themselves journalists: the big hitters of the so-called mainstream, especially the “liberals” who mark and patrol the perimeters of dissent.
And that is what happened. I have been a reporter for more than 50 years and I have never known a smear campaign like it: the fabricated character assassination of a man who refused to join the club: who believed journalism was a service to the public, never to those above.
Assange shamed his persecutors. He produced scoop after scoop. He exposed the fraudulence of wars promoted by the media and the homicidal nature of America’s wars, the corruption of dictators, the evils of Guantanamo.
He forced us in the West to look in the mirror. He exposed the official truth-tellers in the media as collaborators: those I would call Vichy journalists. None of these imposters believed Assange when he warned that his life was in danger: that the “sex scandal” in Sweden was a set up and an American hellhole was the ultimate destination. And he was right, and repeatedly right. John Pilger - The War ... Best Price: $6.76 Buy New $10.75 (as of 06:07 UTC - Details)
The extradition hearing in London this week is the final act of an Anglo-American campaign to bury Julian Assange. It is not due process. It is due revenge. The American indictment is clearly rigged, a demonstrable sham. So far, the hearings have been reminiscent of their Stalinist equivalents during the Cold War.
Today, the land that gave us Magna Carta, Great Britain, is distinguished by the abandonment of its own sovereignty in allowing a malign foreign power to manipulate justice and by the vicious psychological torture of Julian – a form of torture, as Nils Melzer, the UN expert has pointed out, that was refined by the Nazis because it was most effective in breaking its victims.
Every time I have visited Assange in Belmarsh prison, I have seen the effects of this torture. When I last saw him, he had lost more than 10 kilos in weight; his arms had no muscle. Incredibly, his wicked sense of humour was intact.
As for Assange’s homeland, Australia has displayed only a cringeing cowardice as its government has secretly conspired against its own citizen who ought to be celebrated as a national hero. Not for nothing did George W. Bush anoint the Australian prime minister his “deputy sheriff”.
It is said that whatever happens to Julian Assange in the next three weeks will diminish if not destroy freedom of the press in the West. But which press? The Guardian? The BBC, The New York Times, the Jeff Bezos Washington Post? In Defense of Julian A... Margaret Kunstler (edi... Best Price: $19.98 Buy New $23.00 (as of 06:07 UTC - Details)
No, the journalists in these organisations can breathe freely. The Judases on the Guardian who flirted with Julian, exploited his landmark work, made their pile then betrayed him, have nothing to fear. They are safe because they are needed.
Freedom of the press now rests with the honourable few: the exceptions, the dissidents on the internet who belong to no club, who are neither rich nor laden with Pulitzers, but produce fine, disobedient, moral journalism – those like Julian Assange.
Meanwhile, it is our responsibility to stand by a true journalist whose sheer courage ought to be inspiration to all of us who still believe that freedom is possible. I salute him.
Reprinted with the author’s permission.
The Best of John Pilger


Covid-19 or Covid-9-11?

“ September 11th was the jumpstart for what is now an accelerated agenda by the ruthless elite : it was a staged war pretext no different from the sinking of the Lusitania , the provoking of Pearl Harbor and the Gulf of Tonkin lie .
In fact if 9/11 wasn ’ t a planned war pretext , it would be the exception to the rule .
It has been used to launch two unprovoked illegal wars – one against Iraq and one against Afghanistan .
However , 9/11 was a pretext for another war as well : the War against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Security , The Military Tribunals Act and other legislations are all completely and entirely designed to destroy your civil liberties and limit your ability to fight back against what is coming .
Currently in the United States unannounced to most brainwashed Americans your home can be searched without a warrant without you being home , you can in turn be arrested with no charges revealed to you , detained indefinitely with no access to a lawyer , and legally tortured all under the suspicion that you might be a terrorist … Let ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( United States & War on Terror & False Flag Ops & Civil Rights & Empire US & Foreign Relations US & 9/11 ) Zeitgeist On the eve of the 9-11 anniversary , it is imperative to look at government caused and staged events from the angle of extreme criticism .
This criticism need not be considered from the standpoint of speculation or ‘ conspiracy theory , ’ although any collusion at high levels for the purpose of attaining a particular outcome is certainly conspiratorial .
As is indicated in the quote above @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to fool the people into supporting a particular agenda sought by the ruling ‘ elites , ’ and in turn are designed to be a war against you as citizens of a corrupt state .
The most recent false flag has been this manufactured hoax called the coronavirus ‘ pandemic , ’ but this can only lead to false flag after false flag .
This domino effect is now fully in play , and the victims of this nefarious plot are the masses called the 99 % .
Yes , there is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it is nonetheless tyranny at every turn .
In fact , each false flag event leads to and enhances the next false flag event .
This should be evident to any paying attention , but sadly , few in this country have the impetus or intellectual capability to follow the trail of deceit practiced by the ruling class and their political pawns in their game of attaining total control over what has become a modern proletariat .
After 9-11 , privacy was mostly eliminated , arrests of citizens without cause or warrant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to due process and being suveilled at every turn became the ‘ new normal.
’ With those powers now in place , and the populace conditioned to accept this assault against liberty , the current false threat has taken a similar turn with a slightly different approach .
Instead of a false terror threat by monsters from afar , the false threat today is said to be a killer ‘ virus.
’ Instead of the Patriot Act , we now are under emergency orders that have been used by the federal government as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Instead of arrests for being a terror suspect , arrests now take place due to being labeled a threat against society due to flu symptoms , or simply due to a positive test result , even without symptoms .
Instead of being held in jail or physically tortured , people are forced into home confinement by orders from lowly politicians or local or state ‘ health ’ departments .
Instead of being detained indefinitely , one may be detained for as long as the state deems a person to be a health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Instead of being water boarded , the public at large is required to wear oxygen-stealing masks , and avoid all social contact .
Shower Brush with Soft ... Buy New $ 12.99 ( $ 12.99 / Count ) So the new normal , which is completely absurd , has taken much of the horrendous legislation that was passed after 9-11 , and given it political steroids to do the same things in a different manner .
Much of the legislation passed was said to be temporary in order to fool the public into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they are never temporary , and remain in place forever .
Now , the lockdowns , or self-imprisonment , the quarantines , the isolation , business shutdowns , tracking and tracing , mask wearing , and distancing are all said to be temporary .
The same will be claimed about the coming deadly vaccine .
Most all liberty stealing legislation and executive orders enacted after every government false flag event have remained in place , all with the hope that the people are too ignorant to see what is happening right before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked well in the past , so what will happen this time around ?
Will all these temporary draconian measures simply go away as promised after the so-called ‘ virus ’ threat subsides , or will the ‘ new normal ’ instituted by the evil liars and cheats in the political class retain these measures for future use ?
There is only one answer to this question , and in this case , history will definitely repeat itself .
So what difference is there between the 9-11 false flag exercise and the current @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the differences are only at the margin , as everything that is initiated and implemented by the state is meant to force compliance by the herd , to gain their conformity due to fear , and to prosecute a war against all of us at each and every level required in order to gain more power for the state and total control over the masses .
This is the real agenda , and has always been the main agenda .
Power and control are the underlying aspects and core convictions of all government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the more powerful ruling class of banking , corporate , and wealthy claimed elites control it , is the enforcement arm of the real power .
Government therefore , is the closest to the people , and by tearing down government power , the top tier of the ruling class become exposed and vulnerable , and more unprotected .
So mass resistance against government can lead to tearing down the system of power and control , and help to lead us back to more freedom and less oppression .
Plandemic : Exposing th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 8.95 Most think that the result of false flag events is to create war for money , power , geopolitical control , and for conquest , and that is not far wrong , but war is also desired in order to gain more control over the citizenry , because the powerful have to gain control at home in order to gain control globally .
This new false flag called Covid-19 was long ago designed in order to effect global dominance by the few over the rest of us .
Will this be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this country acquiesce to the will of tyrants ?
Will the people allow for the continued murder of their families and neighbors by the state ?
Will the people continue to hide from themselves and the truth ?
Will the people never fight back ?
Will the people allow themselves to become the serfs in a society ruled by kings ?
That is what is coming , and there is only one thing standing in the way of the oppressors , and that is mass resistance by the majority .
Without the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we will soon be left with nothing , and will have allowed our own servitude .
The False Flag Operation takes the concept of black propaganda to a murderous extreme .
Secret agents carry out an act of terrorism or other outrage which is then blamed on the enemy of choice .
( CIA & Intelligence Agencies & Secrecy & Black Ops & False Flag Operations ) Counter-Intelligence : Shining a Light on Black Operations s1e3 : The Strategy of Tension , 2013 The Best of Gary D. Barnett

“September 11th was the jumpstart for what is now an accelerated agenda by the ruthless elite: it was a staged war pretext no different from the sinking of the Lusitania, the provoking of Pearl Harbor and the Gulf of Tonkin lie. In fact if 9/11 wasn’t a planned war pretext, it would be the exception to the rule. It has been used to launch two unprovoked illegal wars – one against Iraq and one against Afghanistan. However, 9/11 was a pretext for another war as well: the War against You. The Patriot Act, Homeland Security, The Military Tribunals Act and other legislations are all completely and entirely designed to destroy your civil liberties and limit your ability to fight back against what is coming. Currently in the United States unannounced to most brainwashed Americans your home can be searched without a warrant without you being home, you can in turn be arrested with no charges revealed to you, detained indefinitely with no access to a lawyer, and legally tortured all under the suspicion that you might be a terrorist … Let’s recognize how history repeats itself.”
(United States & War on Terror & False Flag Ops & Civil Rights & Empire US & Foreign Relations US & 9/11) Zeitgeist
On the eve of the 9-11 anniversary, it is imperative to look at government caused and staged events from the angle of extreme criticism. This criticism need not be considered from the standpoint of speculation or ‘conspiracy theory,’ although any collusion at high levels for the purpose of attaining a particular outcome is certainly conspiratorial. As is indicated in the quote above, false flag events are always meant to fool the people into supporting a particular agenda sought by the ruling ‘elites,’ and in turn are designed to be a war against you as citizens of a corrupt state. The most recent false flag has been this manufactured hoax called the coronavirus ‘pandemic,’ but this can only lead to false flag after false flag. This domino effect is now fully in play, and the victims of this nefarious plot are the masses called the 99%.
Yes, there is a difference in the manner of tyranny, but it is nonetheless tyranny at every turn. In fact, each false flag event leads to and enhances the next false flag event. This should be evident to any paying attention, but sadly, few in this country have the impetus or intellectual capability to follow the trail of deceit practiced by the ruling class and their political pawns in their game of attaining total control over what has become a modern proletariat. After 9-11, privacy was mostly eliminated, arrests of citizens without cause or warrant was legalized, being detained without access to due process and being suveilled at every turn became the ‘new normal.’ With those powers now in place, and the populace conditioned to accept this assault against liberty, the current false threat has taken a similar turn with a slightly different approach. Instead of a false terror threat by monsters from afar, the false threat today is said to be a killer ‘virus.’ Instead of the Patriot Act, we now are under emergency orders that have been used by the federal government as well as all state and local governments. Instead of arrests for being a terror suspect, arrests now take place due to being labeled a threat against society due to flu symptoms, or simply due to a positive test result, even without symptoms. Instead of being held in jail or physically tortured, people are forced into home confinement by orders from lowly politicians or local or state ‘health’ departments. Instead of being detained indefinitely, one may be detained for as long as the state deems a person to be a health threat by ‘self’ imprisonment. Instead of being water boarded, the public at large is required to wear oxygen-stealing masks, and avoid all social contact. Shower Brush with Soft... Buy New $12.99 ($12.99 / Count) (as of 02:15 UTC - Details)
So the new normal, which is completely absurd, has taken much of the horrendous legislation that was passed after 9-11, and given it political steroids to do the same things in a different manner. Much of the legislation passed was said to be temporary in order to fool the public into accepting the emergency dictates. Of course, they are never temporary, and remain in place forever. Now, the lockdowns, or self-imprisonment, the quarantines, the isolation, business shutdowns, tracking and tracing, mask wearing, and distancing are all said to be temporary. The same will be claimed about the coming deadly vaccine. Most all liberty stealing legislation and executive orders enacted after every government false flag event have remained in place, all with the hope that the people are too ignorant to see what is happening right before their eyes. This seems to have worked well in the past, so what will happen this time around? Will all these temporary draconian measures simply go away as promised after the so-called ‘virus’ threat subsides, or will the ‘new normal’ instituted by the evil liars and cheats in the political class retain these measures for future use? There is only one answer to this question, and in this case, history will definitely repeat itself.
So what difference is there between the 9-11 false flag exercise and the current Covid-19 false flag? As mentioned, the differences are only at the margin, as everything that is initiated and implemented by the state is meant to force compliance by the herd, to gain their conformity due to fear, and to prosecute a war against all of us at each and every level required in order to gain more power for the state and total control over the masses. This is the real agenda, and has always been the main agenda. Power and control are the underlying aspects and core convictions of all government action. The government, even though the more powerful ruling class of banking, corporate, and wealthy claimed elites control it, is the enforcement arm of the real power. Government therefore, is the closest to the people, and by tearing down government power, the top tier of the ruling class become exposed and vulnerable, and more unprotected. So mass resistance against government can lead to tearing down the system of power and control, and help to lead us back to more freedom and less oppression. Plandemic: Exposing th... Fife, Dr. Bruce Buy New $8.95 (as of 02:15 UTC - Details)
Most think that the result of false flag events is to create war for money, power, geopolitical control, and for conquest, and that is not far wrong, but war is also desired in order to gain more control over the citizenry, because the powerful have to gain control at home in order to gain control globally. This new false flag called Covid-19 was long ago designed in order to effect global dominance by the few over the rest of us. Will this be a successful coup? Will the people of this country acquiesce to the will of tyrants? Will the people allow for the continued murder of their families and neighbors by the state? Will the people continue to hide from themselves and the truth? Will the people never fight back? Will the people allow themselves to become the serfs in a society ruled by kings?
That is what is coming, and there is only one thing standing in the way of the oppressors, and that is mass resistance by the majority. Without the courage to fight against the ruling class, we will soon be left with nothing, and will have allowed our own servitude.
The False Flag Operation takes the concept of black propaganda to a murderous extreme. Secret agents carry out an act of terrorism or other outrage which is then blamed on the enemy of choice.
(CIA & Intelligence Agencies & Secrecy & Black Ops & False Flag Operations) Counter-Intelligence: Shining a Light on Black Operations s1e3: The Strategy of Tension, 2013
The Best of Gary D. Barnett


lewrockwell--2020-09-09--RFK Jr. & Children’s Health Defense Sue University of California for Making Flu Shot Mandatory

What Happened : The University of California is one of many in the United States that have made the flu shot mandatory for all students , staff and faculty .
Prior to now , it remained a choice for people .
Flu shots must be taken by November 1st of this year , according to UC , it ’ s a “ proactive measure to help protect members of the UC community – and the public at large – and to ameliorate the severe burdens on health care systems anticipated during the coming fall and winter from influenza and COVID-19.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ evidence that vaccines are not completely safe for everyone , let alone completely safe , Robert F. Kennedy Jr , renowned attorney and Chair of Children ’ s Health Defense , is now suing the University of California .
LeapFrog 100 Animals Book Buy New $ 13.49 Dr. Janet Napolitano says mandatory flu shots will “ lessen the chance of being infected with COVID.
” However , prevailing research suggests that flu vaccines actually raise the risk from coronavirus infection .
A January 2020 US Pentagon study ( Wolff 2020 ) found that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus by 36 % .
“ Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses , a phenomenon known as “ virus interference… ’ vaccine derived ’ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus… ” Many other studies suggest the increased risk of viral respiratory infections , including coronavirus , following vaccination for influenza .
• A 2018 CDC study ( Rikin et al 2018 ) found that flu shots increase the risk of non-flu acute respiratory illnesses ( ARIs ) , including coronavirus , in children .
• A 2011 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) found that flu shots doubled the risk for non-flu viral lung infections .
• A 2012 Hong Kong study ( Cowling et al 2012 ) found that flu shots increase the risk for non-flu respiratory infections by 4.4 times .
• A 2017 study ( Mawson et al 2017 ) found vaccinated children were 5.9 times more likely to suffer pneumonia than their unvaccinated peers .
It ’ s important to mention that the coronavirus study listed above from Wolff does not include COVID-19 , but the coronaviruses already in circulation prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This Is Important : This is important because all of these mandates are being enacted under the belief that they will prevent flu cases , COVID-19 cases , and also help protect other people as well , which is the backbone argument of the vaccine industry .
Mandates are also moving forward based on the assumption that vaccines are completely safe and effective for everyone .
The problem is , these assumptions do not match a lot of the science that ’ s been published over the years regarding the flu shot .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 6.00 Dr. Peter Doshi is an associate editor at The BMJ ( British Medical Journal ) and also an assistant professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy published a paper in The BMJ titled “ Influenza : Marketing Vaccines By Marketing Disease.
” In it , he points out that the CDC pledges “ to base all public health decisions on the highest quality of scientific data , openly and objectively derived , ” and how this isn ’ t the case when it comes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He stresses that “ the vaccine may be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed , and that “ the threat of influenza seems to be overstated.
” He goes on to state : But perhaps the cleverest aspect of the influenza marketing strategy surrounds the claim that “ flu ” and “ influenza ” are the same .
The distinction seems subtle , and purely semantic .
But general lack of awareness of the difference might be the primary reason few people realize that even the ideal influenza vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses , can only deal with a small part of the “ flu ” problem because most “ flu ” appears to have nothing to do with influenza .
Every year , hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US .
Of those tested , on average 16 % are found to be influenza positive .
( fig 2 ) .⇓ All influenza is “ flu , ” but only one in six “ flus ” might be influenza .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that “ flu shots ” don ’ t work : for most flus , they can ’ t .
Dr. Alvin Moss , MD and professor at the West Virginia University School of Medicine emphasizes in this video : The flu vaccine happens to be the vaccine that causes the most injury in this country .
The vaccine injury compensation program , 40 percent of all vaccinations in this country are flu shots , but 60 percent of all the compensations are for the flu vaccine .
So a disproportionate number of vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think many of you it ’ s been recommended to you that you get the flu shot , I don ’ t know if you ’ re aware of the fact , the CDC statistics are , that every year they look at vaccine effectiveness , for this particular year the vaccine effectiveness is 48 percent , so that means it ’ s not highly effective .
It ’ s not even all that effective , if you look at the scientific literature…the evidence to support giving the flu vaccine is moderate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evidence .
They say the evidence to support giving the flu vaccine to people over the age of 65 is not there , it ’ s inconclusive .
So a lot of the things we ’ ve been told as Americans about vaccinations are not really based on the science .
( source ) The National Childhood Vaccine Injury ( NCVIA ) has already paid out approximately $ 4 billion to compensate families of vaccine injured children .
As astronomical as the monetary awards are , they ’ re even more alarming considering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System ( VAERS ) .
If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct – only 1 % of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated – then up to 99 % of vaccine injuries go unreported .
Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients , and 1.4 million doses ( of 45 different vaccines ) were given to 376,452 individuals .
Of these doses , 35,570 possible reactions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ identified .
This is an average of 890 possible events , an average of 1.3 events per clinician , per month .
This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference .
( source ) This completely contradicts the CDC ’ s claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines .
Nuby Ice Gel Teether Keys Buy New $ 3.88 Our CETV Episode About The Flu Shot : Facebook is blocking many of our posts from our own audience , Youtube demonetized us and many articles like this particular one may labelled and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As a result , in order to ( attempt to ) stay alive and continue doing what we do , we created a platform called CETV .
It ’ s away for people to access information without organizations like Google or Facebook stepping in to censor it .
You can sign up for your free trial if you ’ re interesting in browsing through what we have , and if you ’ re interested in supporting us you can get a monthly/yearly subscription after that if you want to continue .
In one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joe Martino and I discuss the flu vaccine .
Here is a brief clip of the episode , again , you can sign up for a free trial to watch the full episode .
The Takeaway : Why are so many concerns being raised with regards to vaccinations being completely ignored and unacknowledged ?
Why are those who raise these concerns labelled as “ anti-vaccination ?
” Why does the mainstream use these labels , as well as ridicule , instead of actually addressing the points made and countering them ?
Why are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ humanity when there are so many safety concerns ?
Would more rigorous safety testing not be in the best interest of everybody ?
Wouldn ’ t everybody agree that any concerns with vaccinations should be addressed openly , publicly and transparently ?
Vaccine mandates , and others , are simply going to force people to exit various parts of the ‘ system ’ they will no longer be allowed to participate in .
This begs the question , do we want to continue to be dependent on an entity , like the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ food and shelter , etc , or is there another way to do it ?
With so many conflicts of interests and examples of corruption within our federal health regulatory agencies , as well as clear evidence of concern , why do we continue to live the way we do , why do we keep voting when that only upholds a system we no longer want to play with ?
Why are we letting powerful entities make our decisions and do our thinking for us ?
What ’ s really going on here @

What Happened: The University of California is one of many in the United States that have made the flu shot mandatory for all students, staff and faculty. Prior to now, it remained a choice for people. Flu shots must be taken by November 1st of this year, according to UC, it’s a “proactive measure to help protect members of the UC community – and the public at large – and to ameliorate the severe burdens on health care systems anticipated during the coming fall and winter from influenza and COVID-19.”
Due to the growing amount of evidence that vaccines are not completely safe for everyone, let alone completely safe, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, renowned attorney and Chair of Children’s Health Defense, is now suing the University of California.
Kennedy Explains,
LeapFrog 100 Animals Book Buy New $13.49 (as of 02:16 UTC - Details) Dr. Janet Napolitano says mandatory flu shots will “lessen the chance of being infected with COVID.” However, prevailing research suggests that flu vaccines actually raise the risk from coronavirus infection. A January 2020 US Pentagon study (Wolff 2020) found that the flu shot INCREASES the risks from coronavirus by 36%. “Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as “virus interference…’vaccine derived’ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus…” Many other studies suggest the increased risk of viral respiratory infections, including coronavirus, following vaccination for influenza.
A 2018 CDC study (Rikin et al 2018) found that flu shots increase the risk of non-flu acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs), including coronavirus, in children.
A 2011 Australian study (Kelly et al 2011) found that flu shots doubled the risk for non-flu viral lung infections.
A 2012 Hong Kong study (Cowling et al 2012) found that flu shots increase the risk for non-flu respiratory infections by 4.4 times.
A 2017 study (Mawson et al 2017) found vaccinated children were 5.9 times more likely to suffer pneumonia than their unvaccinated peers.
Children’s Health Defense is aware of a contrary study published last month by Gunther Fink et. al. That report appears to conclude that flu vaccines may be prophylactic against coronavirus. The study, of Brazilian populations, has many dubious unexplained outcomes including a 47% death rate among study subjects, raising numerous unanswered questions about the methodology and validity of this research. UC campuses should not be encouraging flu shots until we have unambiguous science supporting efficacy against COVID.
It’s important to mention that the coronavirus study listed above from Wolff does not include COVID-19, but the coronaviruses already in circulation prior to the novel coronavirus outbreak.
Why This Is Important: This is important because all of these mandates are being enacted under the belief that they will prevent flu cases, COVID-19 cases, and also help protect other people as well, which is the backbone argument of the vaccine industry. Mandates are also moving forward based on the assumption that vaccines are completely safe and effective for everyone.
The problem is, these assumptions do not match a lot of the science that’s been published over the years regarding the flu shot. The First Years Stack ... Buy New $6.00 (as of 03:20 UTC - Details)
Dr. Peter Doshi is an associate editor at The BMJ (British Medical Journal) and also an assistant professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy published a paper in The BMJ titled “Influenza: Marketing Vaccines By Marketing Disease.” In it, he points out that the CDC pledges “to base all public health decisions on the highest quality of scientific data, openly and objectively derived,” and how this isn’t the case when it comes to the flu vaccine and its marketing. He stresses that “the vaccine may be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and that “the threat of influenza seems to be overstated.”
He goes on to state:
But perhaps the cleverest aspect of the influenza marketing strategy surrounds the claim that “flu” and “influenza” are the same. The distinction seems subtle, and purely semantic. But general lack of awareness of the difference might be the primary reason few people realize that even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the “flu” problem because most “flu” appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive. (fig 2).⇓ All influenza is “flu,” but only one in six “flus” might be influenza. It’s no wonder so many people feel that “flu shots” don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.
Dr. Alvin Moss, MD and professor at the West Virginia University School of Medicine emphasizes in this video:
The flu vaccine happens to be the vaccine that causes the most injury in this country. The vaccine injury compensation program, 40 percent of all vaccinations in this country are flu shots, but 60 percent of all the compensations are for the flu vaccine. So a disproportionate number of vaccine related injuries are the flu shot. I think many of you it’s been recommended to you that you get the flu shot, I don’t know if you’re aware of the fact, the CDC statistics are, that every year they look at vaccine effectiveness, for this particular year the vaccine effectiveness is 48 percent, so that means it’s not highly effective. It’s not even all that effective, if you look at the scientific literature…the evidence to support giving the flu vaccine is moderate to weak. It is not strong evidence. They say the evidence to support giving the flu vaccine to people over the age of 65 is not there, it’s inconclusive. So a lot of the things we’ve been told as Americans about vaccinations are not really based on the science. (source)
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury (NCVIA) has already paid out approximately $4 billion to compensate families of vaccine injured children. As astronomical as the monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering HHS claims that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct – only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated – then up to 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported.
Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference. (source)
This completely contradicts the CDC’s claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines. Nuby Ice Gel Teether Keys Buy New $3.88 (as of 02:16 UTC - Details)
Our CETV Episode About The Flu Shot: Facebook is blocking many of our posts from our own audience, Youtube demonetized us and many articles like this particular one may labelled and are labelled as “fake news.” As a result, in order to (attempt to) stay alive and continue doing what we do, we created a platform called CETV. It’s away for people to access information without organizations like Google or Facebook stepping in to censor it. You can sign up for your free trial if you’re interesting in browsing through what we have, and if you’re interested in supporting us you can get a monthly/yearly subscription after that if you want to continue. In one of our latest episodes, CE founder Joe Martino and I discuss the flu vaccine. Here is a brief clip of the episode, again, you can sign up for a free trial to watch the full episode.
The Takeaway: Why are so many concerns being raised with regards to vaccinations being completely ignored and unacknowledged? Why are those who raise these concerns labelled as “anti-vaccination?” Why does the mainstream use these labels, as well as ridicule, instead of actually addressing the points made and countering them? Why are vaccines marketed to be gods gift to humanity when there are so many safety concerns? Would more rigorous safety testing not be in the best interest of everybody? Wouldn’t everybody agree that any concerns with vaccinations should be addressed openly, publicly and transparently?
Vaccine mandates, and others, are simply going to force people to exit various parts of the ‘system’ they will no longer be allowed to participate in. This begs the question, do we want to continue to be dependent on an entity, like the government, for our basic needs, like food and shelter, etc, or is there another way to do it? With so many conflicts of interests and examples of corruption within our federal health regulatory agencies, as well as clear evidence of concern, why do we continue to live the way we do, why do we keep voting when that only upholds a system we no longer want to play with? Why are we letting powerful entities make our decisions and do our thinking for us? What’s really going on here?
Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.


The Trojan Donkey

Since earning the nomination as the 2020 Democratic candidate for the presidency , Joe Biden has stated that he is a “ transition candidate.
” This was an odd statement , especially for someone who has hardly begun his formal campaign .
( He ’ s not even in office yet and he ’ s discussing being on the way out ? )
Yet this was not just another one-off Biden gaff , as has been suggested by some .
Since announcing his pick for vice president , he has stated , “ Look , I view myself as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So what ’ s up here ?
The candidate is only a place-holder for the real , intended president ?
Well , let ’ s have a look at that possibility .
Technocracy Rising : Th ... Wood , Patrick M. Best Price : $ 30.00 Buy New $ 24.00 Joe Biden , by any measure , is a poor candidate for the office .
After almost half a century in politics , he ’ s had a career mostly as a political hack who would support any issue that seemed popular at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ record in the Senate has been that of a man who supported whatever bill would please his peers and further his career .
Seemingly , he either has no inner core of belief , or he ’ s been willing to sacrifice it at a moment ’ s notice , if it might help his next election .
After forty-seven years of elected office , he ’ s not regarded as having a commitment to… well , anything .
And yet he became the choice of the Democratic party as one candidate after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Clearly this was a party that was not only leaderless , but couldn ’ t even seem to invent a leader for the sake of the election .
Kamala Harris , his presumptive vice president , dropped out of the presidential race in December 2019 , when her popularity amongst democrats dropped to 3.4 % .
Since democrats make up roughly half of the population , this means that less than 2 % of Americans would have wanted her as their president .
And yet , as stated above , candidate Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ myself as a bridge , not as anything else.
” That ’ s quite curious .
He apparently is stating that his only purpose is to win the election , then pass the baton to the next leader .
Presumably , his vice president .
This has never occurred in US politics , although it is true that , at this point , Mr. Biden may well be too far gone to even begin to handle the job .
And that leads us to the possibility that the deal has already been brokered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election , then have , let ’ s say , a “ medical emergency , ” at which point he would pass the reins to the new president – Kamala Harris .
Clearly , Ms. Harris could not have been elected on her own merit , as even democrats found her to be fundamentally lacking last December .
Even the more radical elements of the party have sensed that she is untrustworthy and even dangerous .
Technocracy : The Hard ... Wood , Patrick M. Best Price : $ 33.00 Buy New $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s history , there ’ s much debate as to whether the president is the supreme leader , or whether he or she is merely the face presented by the Deep State , who run the country from the background and give the president his marching orders .
Either way , this eventuality would not bode well for the US .
As supreme leader , Ms. Harris , based upon her reputation , would be an autocratic figure who behaved rather ruthlessly toward those who failed to comply with her edicts .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , she would be a very powerful tool , implementing the loss of freedoms that were passed into law with the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act and the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act .
These two acts , taken together , essentially eliminate the US Constitution in practical terms .
All that ’ s necessary to implement them would be for a highly demonstrative president to declare a national emergency .
Both acts would then be in force .
It would not be difficult to imagine Ms. Harris in this role .
Presently , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set of events unfolding in the US .
Major cities have seen months of continual protests and even rioting , which apparently have been very organized and well-funded .
In a normal situation , the mayors and governors would call in the police to quell such riots .
Yet we ’ re seeing the opposite .
Local political leaders are consistently hamstringing local police , making it impossible for them to do their jobs , thereby increasing the extent of devastation by rioters .
Rioters are routinely let off with a slap on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their homes from rioters are arrested and charged .
This , of course , is the exact opposite of what the Rule of Law is meant to achieve .
Trilaterals Over Washi ... Sutton , Antony C. Best Price : $ 34.32 Buy New $ 27.55 There ’ s every reason to believe that this condition will continue to worsen well after the 2020 election , and at some point , Americans from both the right and left will find themselves begging for the federal government to step in – to return the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Central governments , of course , perennially dislike local policing , as local police tend to be loyal their own communities .
However , federal troops have no such loyalty .
They perform as their superiors dictate , regardless of where they are deployed .
But once the local police have been gotten out of the way , it would be quite easy for an authoritarian president to deploy federal troops to re-establish order , and initially , this would meet with the approval of worried Americans .
Historically , this has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In every case , martial law is instituted as a “ temporary measure , ” to quell existing unrest .
But , as Milton Friedman said , “ Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.
” If this development is in America ’ s future , as events indicate , it ’ s likely that the media will repeat the words , “ public safety ” endlessly as the situation unfolds .
The words “ martial law ” and “ police state ” may be heard amongst some of the populace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the news programmes .
Another word that ’ s unlikely to appear often in the media is “ tyranny , ” yet this will be precisely the result of the introduction of a police state .
But all the above is dependent upon a political leader who has the forceful demeanour to ensure that the job gets done with a minimum of dissent .
The American public are therefore left to ponder whether it may be that a vastly unpopular Trojan donkey may be closer to the presidency than she presently appears .

Since earning the nomination as the 2020 Democratic candidate for the presidency, Joe Biden has stated that he is a “transition candidate.”
This was an odd statement, especially for someone who has hardly begun his formal campaign. (He’s not even in office yet and he’s discussing being on the way out?)
Yet this was not just another one-off Biden gaff, as has been suggested by some. Since announcing his pick for vice president, he has stated, “Look, I view myself as a bridge, not as anything else.”
So what’s up here? The candidate is only a place-holder for the real, intended president?
Well, let’s have a look at that possibility. Technocracy Rising: Th... Wood, Patrick M. Best Price: $30.00 Buy New $24.00 (as of 07:16 UTC - Details)
Joe Biden, by any measure, is a poor candidate for the office. After almost half a century in politics, he’s had a career mostly as a political hack who would support any issue that seemed popular at the time. Similarly, his voting record in the Senate has been that of a man who supported whatever bill would please his peers and further his career.
Seemingly, he either has no inner core of belief, or he’s been willing to sacrifice it at a moment’s notice, if it might help his next election. After forty-seven years of elected office, he’s not regarded as having a commitment to… well, anything.
And yet he became the choice of the Democratic party as one candidate after another dropped out of the presidential race. Clearly this was a party that was not only leaderless, but couldn’t even seem to invent a leader for the sake of the election.
Kamala Harris, his presumptive vice president, dropped out of the presidential race in December 2019, when her popularity amongst democrats dropped to 3.4%. Since democrats make up roughly half of the population, this means that less than 2% of Americans would have wanted her as their president.
And yet, as stated above, candidate Biden announces, “Look, I view myself as a bridge, not as anything else.”
That’s quite curious. He apparently is stating that his only purpose is to win the election, then pass the baton to the next leader. Presumably, his vice president.
This has never occurred in US politics, although it is true that, at this point, Mr. Biden may well be too far gone to even begin to handle the job.
And that leads us to the possibility that the deal has already been brokered – that Mr. Biden would win the election, then have, let’s say, a “medical emergency,” at which point he would pass the reins to the new president – Kamala Harris.
Clearly, Ms. Harris could not have been elected on her own merit, as even democrats found her to be fundamentally lacking last December. Even the more radical elements of the party have sensed that she is untrustworthy and even dangerous. Technocracy: The Hard ... Wood, Patrick M. Best Price: $33.00 Buy New $24.59 (as of 03:55 UTC - Details)
At this point in America’s history, there’s much debate as to whether the president is the supreme leader, or whether he or she is merely the face presented by the Deep State, who run the country from the background and give the president his marching orders.
Either way, this eventuality would not bode well for the US. As supreme leader, Ms. Harris, based upon her reputation, would be an autocratic figure who behaved rather ruthlessly toward those who failed to comply with her edicts.
But as the figurehead for the Deep State, she would be a very powerful tool, implementing the loss of freedoms that were passed into law with the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act and the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act.
These two acts, taken together, essentially eliminate the US Constitution in practical terms. All that’s necessary to implement them would be for a highly demonstrative president to declare a national emergency. Both acts would then be in force.
It would not be difficult to imagine Ms. Harris in this role.
Presently, we’re watching a very odd set of events unfolding in the US.
Major cities have seen months of continual protests and even rioting, which apparently have been very organized and well-funded.
In a normal situation, the mayors and governors would call in the police to quell such riots.
Yet we’re seeing the opposite. Local political leaders are consistently hamstringing local police, making it impossible for them to do their jobs, thereby increasing the extent of devastation by rioters.
Rioters are routinely let off with a slap on the wrist, whilst those who defend their homes from rioters are arrested and charged.
This, of course, is the exact opposite of what the Rule of Law is meant to achieve. Trilaterals Over Washi... Sutton, Antony C. Best Price: $34.32 Buy New $27.55 (as of 04:28 UTC - Details)
There’s every reason to believe that this condition will continue to worsen well after the 2020 election, and at some point, Americans from both the right and left will find themselves begging for the federal government to step in – to return the US to a state of relative safety.
Central governments, of course, perennially dislike local policing, as local police tend to be loyal their own communities. However, federal troops have no such loyalty. They perform as their superiors dictate, regardless of where they are deployed.
But once the local police have been gotten out of the way, it would be quite easy for an authoritarian president to deploy federal troops to re-establish order, and initially, this would meet with the approval of worried Americans.
Historically, this has occurred countless times throughout the world. In every case, martial law is instituted as a “temporary measure,” to quell existing unrest. But, as Milton Friedman said, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.”
If this development is in America’s future, as events indicate, it’s likely that the media will repeat the words, “public safety” endlessly as the situation unfolds. The words “martial law” and “police state” may be heard amongst some of the populace, but will be unlikely to dominate the news programmes.
Another word that’s unlikely to appear often in the media is “tyranny,” yet this will be precisely the result of the introduction of a police state.
But all the above is dependent upon a political leader who has the forceful demeanour to ensure that the job gets done with a minimum of dissent.
The American public are therefore left to ponder whether it may be that a vastly unpopular Trojan donkey may be closer to the presidency than she presently appears.
Reprinted with permission from International Man.


lewrockwell--2020-09-09--Memo to Dr. Scott Atlas, New White House Coronavirus Advisor

Where to begin ?
No new virus was ever shown to exist via proper proof .
Worthless diagnostic test .
Sixteen ways case and death numbers are being faked .
If there were a virus , the only way to stop it would be through open massive public exposure and the gaining of natural immunity .
Therefore , no lockdowns , no masks , no distancing , no vast economic destruction under the watch of a president whose whole program was based on expanding the economy .
Is that enough for starters ?
I ’ d really like to know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in March , when Fauci walked in with Neil Ferguson ’ s preposterous computer predictions of COVID deaths in the US and spoke with Trump .
Did no one bring up the fact that Ferguson ’ s whole career has been a string of failed predictions ?
Was there zero due diligence ?
Did some economic advisor open his mouth and tell the president what a long-term lockdown would do to the economy ?
Fifty million people unemployed ?
Well over a million businesses destroyed ?
Unreported Truths abou ... Berenson , Alex @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understand that Moderna is Fauci ’ s favorite vaccine company , and his agency , NIAID , stands to rake in cash if Moderna ’ s shot turns out to be the choice for COVID—when , in fact , no vaccine is necessary .
I hope you know Moderna is a little punk firm that has never brought a product of any kind to market , and yet garnered $ 500 million in fed funds to research a vaccine .
On top of that , Moderna is deploying RNA technology , which has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and has caused , in trials , serious adverse effects .
Are you aware the NY Times recently reported on a large study showing up to 90 percent of all US COVID cases have been false positives , owing to the extreme sensitivity of the PCR test ?
Not enough virus present in humans to harm a flea .
No likelihood of contagion , either .
Have you read the results of a New York study revealing patients over the age of 65 who are put on ventilators die at the staggering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cuomo and Trump keep pushing ventilators .
COVID is old people .
Period .
No virus necessary .
They ’ re all suffering from long-term , multiple , serious health conditions .
They ’ ve all been treated , for years , with toxic medical drugs .
They ’ re terrified at the possibility of a COVID diagnosis .
Then they are diagnosed with COVID .
Then they ’ re isolated and cut off from family and friends .
And they die .
NO VIRUS NECESSARY .
Unreported Truths abou ... Berenson , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ makes the recent CDC revelation about death numbers more relevant than most people can fathom .
The CDC states that only 6 percent of all US COVID deaths have been unambiguously caused by a virus alone .
The other 94 percent are overwhelmingly the old people I just described .
Get it ?
And now comes a new group of lunatics—computer modelers from the University of Washington , who are predicting the US death toll from COVID will rise above 600,000 this winter .
Pressed into their amateur thickly sliced baloney—they ignore the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I just mentioned .
Do not let the White House buy this latest death-number projection .
Tell Trump one unimaginable screw-up ( accepting Ferguson ’ s criminal projection ) is quite enough .
Gather up your forces , Scott .
Talk to Dr. John Ioannidis and his merry band of colleagues who tried to get through to Trump and failed , just before you were appointed coronavirus advisor .
Bring the house .
You know Fauci and Gates and their sub-honchos are angling for another serious lockdown this winter , when they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of flu-like illness over into COVID .
You accepted the White House invite .
You bought the ticket , now take the ride .
The full ride .
Don ’ t stint .
LEGO Architecture Coll ... Buy New $ 99.80 In case you haven ’ t figured it out yet , this is an operation to wreck economies worldwide .
The preposterous virus narrative is the cover story , concealing the objective of the actual war .
Don ’ t let the DC attack dogs back you into a corner and shut @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lose but your reputation in the eyes of people who don ’ t matter .
They ’ ve already taken you off their dance card .
The country could lose itself .
In this situation , there is no defense .
There is only offense .
If they kick you to the curb , you can come and work with us .
You don ’ t get paid , but the one perk is enormous .
You get to define the terms of the battle .
And oh yes , you don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hustlers , shysters , and sociopaths .
The Best of Jon Rappoport

Scott,
Where to begin? No new virus was ever shown to exist via proper proof. Worthless diagnostic test. Sixteen ways case and death numbers are being faked. If there were a virus, the only way to stop it would be through open massive public exposure and the gaining of natural immunity. Therefore, no lockdowns, no masks, no distancing, no vast economic destruction under the watch of a president whose whole program was based on expanding the economy. Is that enough for starters?
I’d really like to know what went on the room, back in March, when Fauci walked in with Neil Ferguson’s preposterous computer predictions of COVID deaths in the US and spoke with Trump.
Did no one bring up the fact that Ferguson’s whole career has been a string of failed predictions? Was there zero due diligence? Did some economic advisor open his mouth and tell the president what a long-term lockdown would do to the economy? Fifty million people unemployed? Well over a million businesses destroyed? Unreported Truths abou... Berenson, Alex Buy New $5.71 (as of 07:13 UTC - Details)
I hope you understand that Moderna is Fauci’s favorite vaccine company, and his agency, NIAID, stands to rake in cash if Moderna’s shot turns out to be the choice for COVID—when, in fact, no vaccine is necessary.
I hope you know Moderna is a little punk firm that has never brought a product of any kind to market, and yet garnered $500 million in fed funds to research a vaccine.
On top of that, Moderna is deploying RNA technology, which has never been approved for any pharmaceutical product, and has caused, in trials, serious adverse effects.
Are you aware the NY Times recently reported on a large study showing up to 90 percent of all US COVID cases have been false positives, owing to the extreme sensitivity of the PCR test? Not enough virus present in humans to harm a flea. No likelihood of contagion, either.
Have you read the results of a New York study revealing patients over the age of 65 who are put on ventilators die at the staggering rate of 97.2 percent? Yet, Cuomo and Trump keep pushing ventilators.
COVID is old people. Period. No virus necessary. They’re all suffering from long-term, multiple, serious health conditions. They’ve all been treated, for years, with toxic medical drugs. They’re terrified at the possibility of a COVID diagnosis. Then they are diagnosed with COVID. Then they’re isolated and cut off from family and friends. And they die. NO VIRUS NECESSARY. Unreported Truths abou... Berenson, Alex Buy New $5.99 (as of 03:17 UTC - Details)
And THAT makes the recent CDC revelation about death numbers more relevant than most people can fathom. The CDC states that only 6 percent of all US COVID deaths have been unambiguously caused by a virus alone. The other 94 percent are overwhelmingly the old people I just described. Get it?
And now comes a new group of lunatics—computer modelers from the University of Washington, who are predicting the US death toll from COVID will rise above 600,000 this winter. Pressed into their amateur thickly sliced baloney—they ignore the CDC “correction” of death numbers I just mentioned.
Do not let the White House buy this latest death-number projection. Tell Trump one unimaginable screw-up (accepting Ferguson’s criminal projection) is quite enough.
Gather up your forces, Scott. Talk to Dr. John Ioannidis and his merry band of colleagues who tried to get through to Trump and failed, just before you were appointed coronavirus advisor.
Bring the house. You know Fauci and Gates and their sub-honchos are angling for another serious lockdown this winter, when they’re going to make every possible case of flu-like illness over into COVID.
You accepted the White House invite. You bought the ticket, now take the ride. The full ride. Don’t stint. LEGO Architecture Coll... Buy New $99.80 (as of 02:19 UTC - Details)
In case you haven’t figured it out yet, this is an operation to wreck economies worldwide. The preposterous virus narrative is the cover story, concealing the objective of the actual war.
Don’t let the DC attack dogs back you into a corner and shut you up.
You have nothing to lose but your reputation in the eyes of people who don’t matter. They’ve already taken you off their dance card.
The country could lose itself.
In this situation, there is no defense. There is only offense.
If they kick you to the curb, you can come and work with us. You don’t get paid, but the one perk is enormous. You get to define the terms of the battle. And oh yes, you don’t have to speak with numbskulls, hustlers, shysters, and sociopaths.
Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
The Best of Jon Rappoport


Foreign Aid Folly

The Trump administration is threatening to withhold nearly $ 130 million in U.S. foreign aid to Ethiopia .
Good .
But this is simply another case of the right policy for the wrong reason .
The reason is not important .
I will make it as simple as I can .
Ethiopia wants to build a dam on the Nile River .
Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam “ until the countries reached a legally binding deal that would address how to manage water flows during droughts or dryer rainy seasons , and established a mechanism to resolve disputes regarding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trying to mediate the dispute .
According to the U.S. Agency for International Development ( USAID ) , in fiscal year 2019 , the United States provided $ 829 million in foreign assistance to Ethiopia .
That amount is “ only ” supposed to be $ 144 million for fiscal year 2020 .
Motion Picture Money P ... Buy New $ 14.99 The United States is threatening to withhold funding for security assistance , counterterrorism and military education and training , anti-human trafficking programs , and broader development assistance funding , but not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assistance , or health programs aimed at addressing COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS .
How many Americans know that the U.S. government gives millions of American taxpayer dollars to Ethiopia every year ?
Even back in 2001 , American taxpayers handed over $ 151 to Ethiopia .
How many Americans would willingly give some of their money to the government of Ethiopia , NGOs that operate in Ethiopia , or directly to the Ethiopian people ?
Americans are a generous people .
Perhaps some of them would .
Maybe they have family in Ethiopia , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ethiopia , maybe they have a bleeding heart , maybe they want to do it for the children in Ethiopia , maybe they want to make the world a better place , or maybe they feel guilty about living a comfortable life in America ?
But if the government of Ethiopia or the government of the United States sent a letter to every American household appealing for funds for Ethiopia , how many Americans would get out their wallet , checkbook , or credit card ?
I think you know the answer .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s not just Ethiopia .
Today , the U.S. manages foreign assistance programs in more than 100 countries around the world through the efforts of over 20 different U.S. government agencies .
These investments further America ’ s foreign policy interests on issues ranging from expanding free markets , combating extremism , ensuring stable democracies , and addressing the root causes of poverty , while simultaneously fostering global good will .
One hundred countries ?
If you think that sounds expensive , then you are right .
The amount of foreign assistance requested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2020-Sept. 30 , 2021 ) is $ 31.2 billion .
This includes 3.3 billion for Israel , 124.5 million for Iraq , $ 371.8 million for Afghanistan , 1.381 billion for Egypt , 102.3 million for South Sudan , 90.7 million for India , and $ 316.9 million for Ukraine .
Metal Pirate Coins - 3 ... Buy New $ 13.95 Again , how many Americans know this and how many Americans would willingly give some of their money to government of , or the people in , these countries ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same : not too many .
Yes , foreign aid should be withheld from Ethiopia this year , next year , and every year after that .
But it should also be withheld from every other country as well .
Fortunately , I have a new publication that tells the unvarnished truth about foreign aid .
Foreign Aid Folly is a collection of eleven essays written over the past ten years for six different publications .
The contents include : “ The Foreign Aid Debacle ” “ Not Tax-Funded Aid to Myanmar ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Haiti ?
” “ Egypt and U.S. Foreign Policy ” “ Condolences Yes , Assistance No ” “ Republicans and Foreign Aid ” Million Dollar Play Mo ... Buy New $ 9.99 “ Exporting Welfare ” “ Conservatives and Foreign Aid ” “ Time to End All Foreign Aid ” “ Conservatives and the Looting of America ” “ The Question that Is Never Asked About U.S. Military Aid to Ukraine ” Throughout these essays , there are five things relating to foreign aid that resonate : • Foreign aid is simply money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries that many Americans couldn ’ t locate on a map and may have never even heard of .
• Foreign aid is both foreign welfare and foreign bribery .
• No American should be forced to “ contribute ” to the aid of the people or the government of any other country .
• All charity should be private and voluntary .
Charity that is not voluntary is theft .
• All foreign aid should be ended , and no exceptions should be made for natural disasters , humanitarian concerns , national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those Americans who think that aid should be given to foreign countries , I say put your money where your mouth is .
The Best of Laurence M. Vance

The Trump administration is threatening to withhold nearly $130 million in U.S. foreign aid to Ethiopia.
Good. But this is simply another case of the right policy for the wrong reason.
The reason is not important. I will make it as simple as I can.
Ethiopia wants to build a dam on the Nile River. Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam “until the countries reached a legally binding deal that would address how to manage water flows during droughts or dryer rainy seasons, and established a mechanism to resolve disputes regarding the dam.” The United States is trying to mediate the dispute.
According to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), in fiscal year 2019, the United States provided $829 million in foreign assistance to Ethiopia. That amount is “only” supposed to be $144 million for fiscal year 2020. Motion Picture Money P... Buy New $14.99 (as of 02:21 UTC - Details)
The United States is threatening to withhold funding for security assistance, counterterrorism and military education and training, anti-human trafficking programs, and broader development assistance funding, but not funding for emergency humanitarian relief, food assistance, or health programs aimed at addressing COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS.
How many Americans know that the U.S. government gives millions of American taxpayer dollars to Ethiopia every year? Even back in 2001, American taxpayers handed over $151 million to Ethiopia.
How many Americans would willingly give some of their money to the government of Ethiopia, NGOs that operate in Ethiopia, or directly to the Ethiopian people?
Americans are a generous people. Perhaps some of them would. Maybe they have family in Ethiopia, maybe they trace their ancestry back to Ethiopia, maybe they have a bleeding heart, maybe they want to do it for the children in Ethiopia, maybe they want to make the world a better place, or maybe they feel guilty about living a comfortable life in America?
But if the government of Ethiopia or the government of the United States sent a letter to every American household appealing for funds for Ethiopia, how many Americans would get out their wallet, checkbook, or credit card?
I think you know the answer.
And, of course, it’s not just Ethiopia.
According to ForeignAssistance.gov:
Today, the U.S. manages foreign assistance programs in more than 100 countries around the world through the efforts of over 20 different U.S. government agencies. These investments further America’s foreign policy interests on issues ranging from expanding free markets, combating extremism, ensuring stable democracies, and addressing the root causes of poverty, while simultaneously fostering global good will.
One hundred countries? If you think that sounds expensive, then you are right. The amount of foreign assistance requested for fiscal year 2021 (Oct. 1, 2020-Sept. 30, 2021) is $31.2 billion. This includes 3.3 billion for Israel, 124.5 million for Iraq, $371.8 million for Afghanistan, 1.381 billion for Egypt, 102.3 million for South Sudan, 90.7 million for India, and $316.9 million for Ukraine. Metal Pirate Coins - 3... Buy New $13.95 (as of 02:21 UTC - Details)
Again, how many Americans know this and how many Americans would willingly give some of their money to government of, or the people in, these countries?
The answer to both questions is undoubtedly the same: not too many.
Yes, foreign aid should be withheld from Ethiopia this year, next year, and every year after that. But it should also be withheld from every other country as well.
Fortunately, I have a new publication that tells the unvarnished truth about foreign aid.
Foreign Aid Folly is a collection of eleven essays written over the past ten years for six different publications. The contents include:
“The Foreign Aid Debacle”
“Not Tax-Funded Aid to Myanmar”
“Should the U.S. Military Go to Haiti?”
“Egypt and U.S. Foreign Policy”
“Condolences Yes, Assistance No”
“Republicans and Foreign Aid” Million Dollar Play Mo... Buy New $9.99 (as of 02:21 UTC - Details)
“Exporting Welfare”
“Conservatives and Foreign Aid”
“Time to End All Foreign Aid”
“Conservatives and the Looting of America”
“The Question that Is Never Asked About U.S. Military Aid to Ukraine”
Throughout these essays, there are five things relating to foreign aid that resonate:
Foreign aid is simply money confiscated from American taxpayers and sent to countries that many Americans couldn’t locate on a map and may have never even heard of. Foreign aid is both foreign welfare and foreign bribery. No American should be forced to “contribute” to the aid of the people or the government of any other country. All charity should be private and voluntary. Charity that is not voluntary is theft. All foreign aid should be ended, and no exceptions should be made for natural disasters, humanitarian concerns, national interest, or political objectives.
To those Americans who think that aid should be given to foreign countries, I say put your money where your mouth is.
The Best of Laurence M. Vance