lewrockwell--2020-12-24--Why Technocrats Believe in Face Masks

Why Technocrats Believe in Face Masks

“ My name is Ozymandias , King of Kings ; Look on my Works , ye Mighty , and despair !
” – Percy Shelley There ’ s a group of people who walk the earth who don ’ t just believe that life can be improved by humans , they take it a step further .
They believe humans can be improved .
While this sentence may not seem irksome to you , because it is so commonplace , I hope in a few paragraphs you ’ ll see how truly twisted it is .
Most people who observe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people walking the planet — learn some version of “ If it ain ’ t broke , then don ’ t try to fix it.
” Many religions teach this .
Masters of The Univers ... Buy New $ 11.99 Man is created in the image of God , but is fallen .
Man has perfection in him if he can find it .
All creation is of the Creator .
There can be a religious aspect to it , but there are also people who will have no religious reason for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ broke , then don ’ t try to fix it ” view of man and nature .
A conservative might not like new government regulation when a private contract between two people works just fine in almost all scenarios .
A hippie might not see a doctor for 30 years because he doesn ’ t have a health problem and can ’ t imagine the benefit of exposing himself to big pharma ’ s salesman in his community , the local doctor .
A farmer might do the same , to the point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but their “ If it ain ’ t broke , don ’ t try to fix it ” sensibilities overlap perfectly .
An inner-city grandma might feel the exact same way .
An immigrant grandpa may as well .
The sensibility to just leave things alone and the humbleness required to say “ It ’ s not perfect , but its good enough ” is pervasive throughout American society and globally .
Then there are a different group of people .
Cronus Zen Controller ... Best Price : $ 159.99 Buy New $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10 % , maybe even 20 % who comprise the technocratic class and who either never learn that humbleness or learned to do away with that same sense of humbleness .
In that humbleness , “ If it ain ’ t broke don ’ t try to fix it , ” is a connectedness to reality that can seldom be spoken of by a technocrat , because they don ’ t really understand it .
If you mess with something that works , there ’ s a good chance you won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normal again .
That is true in many areas of life .
The mechanic rarely gets your car as good as new .
When he starts to play with one thing , something else starts to go , or he preemptively points out another thing that has lasted 8 years just fine , but is soon “ about to go.
” Similarly , no matter what they say , the doctor never gets your hips as good as new , and heck , his bionic knee implants might feel better than the old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ functionality is no comparison to the real thing .
Not until the doctor takes his own medicine and gets his own knees done will he come to understand what you mean when you say your knees aren ’ t as good as new .
You might even be a little sore about it because that ’ s not the outcome you were told to be able to expect .
No , the technocrat makes a living out of ignoring reality and pretending that humbleness is a quaint term that does not apply to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And there is the rub .
That is where idealism and reality conflict .
Yes , of course , the technocrat can mean well , but good intentions don ’ t go very far in reality .
Before setting into motion the harsh realities of cause and effect that are reality and life , nature doesn ’ t hit the pause button and ask “ Did you mean to do that ?
” RUNMUS Gaming Headset ... Best Price : $ 35.07 Buy New $ 39.85 No , to the contrary , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and it is you that set those in motion .
Often , “ I didn ’ t mean to , ” will mean little in a situation where you should have known better .
The technocrat is he who should know better and instead resolves , to go through life suggesting implicitly and explicitly that outcomes are irrelevant and intentions are fundamental .
That ’ s some pretty serious Lala Land that a double-digit percentage of the Western population seeks to live in through their thoughts and actions .
And it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all and this rule by a technocratic class .
How divorced from reality it is .
How refreshing reality can be when one is drowning in the mire of such cluelessness run amuck , as the idea that intentions matter and outcomes do not , which has so taken our culture by storm .
In the “ If it ain ’ t broke , then don ’ t try to fix it , ” sensibility of the world , it is before you try and fix something that your intentions still matter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you decide whether or not you want a baby .
It is in the courtship that you decide what kind of life you want ahead for you .
It is in the decision to snooze two more hours or rise , to make the bed or to leave it unkempt , to be diligent with your life or to be neglectful , that you demonstrate your intentions .
After you mess up grandma ’ s television set , grandma ’ s car , or grandma ’ s knees , is not the time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about intentions .
Super Mario Maker 2 - ...
Check Amazon for Pricing .
That ’ s how a weasel behaves and a forthright and decent person knows that intimately , which is why technocrats don ’ t get a lot of respect outside of the technocratic circles they travel in .
How many times have we all heard a technocrat explain that he is just — misunderstood ?
Many .
We just don ’ t realize it all that often , in the midst of their sophisticated ways of saying so .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ misunderstood .
Plenty of salt-of-the-earth people know perfectly well what a technocrat means to do .
He means to ignore the wise “ If it ain ’ t broken , then don ’ t try to fix it , ” and then when his fix goes awry , he means to escape culpability by speaking about his intentions , and preparing everyone to trust his next fix , which he assures everyone is sure to work this time around .
If it were left at that , that might be acceptable , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do technocrats let their ideas get challenged in the marketplace of ideas , to get evaluated , and then adopted by individuals freely or alternately ignored and perhaps derided by individuals freely .
No , many technocrats have no such sense of decency .
Instead of trying to win in the marketplace of ideas — the territory of the free man and one of the joys of a free society — they figure out how to get a man with a badge and a gun involved .
Once that happens , even among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a technocrat a chance , all presumption of good intent must be done away with .
If their argument is so great , why would anyone need a billion dollar marketing budget and a half billion worth of armed and trained quasi-military civilian government commandos to get you to hear their good ideas ?
That ’ s where we are in the year 2020 .
Your wonderful immune system .
Your wonderful body .
Your wonderful ability to inhale and exhale .
That can all be improved upon with a 10-cent polypropylene mask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the technocrats assure us .
It is another example of lacking humility and the contact with reality provided by “ If it ain ’ t broke , then don ’ t try to fix it.
” Then there is the added idea that there is an even better way for the technocrat to improve life , even better than the “ mandatory ” face masks : just put everyone ’ s life on hold in mandatory lockdowns .
You salt-of-the-earth people weren ’ t doing anything all that special with your life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2020 , we all saw how sociopathic the technocrats got and saw it pretty quickly as they implemented “ lockdowns for thee , but not for me , ” and turned that crank tighter and tighter .
Why do technocrats advocate so ardently for face masks ?
Because they know no humbleness and because they don ’ t comprehend the common decency of “ If it ain ’ t broke , then don ’ t try to fix it.
” Your face is not broken .
Your immune system is not broken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it should .
Buck the strange trends of our day and never again wear a face mask .
The bestselling “ Face Masks in One Lesson ” by Allan Stevo guides you through many ways of accomplishing exactly that .
The Best of Allan Stevo

“My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
– Percy Shelley
There’s a group of people who walk the earth who don’t just believe that life can be improved by humans, they take it a step further.
They believe humans can be improved.
While this sentence may not seem irksome to you, because it is so commonplace, I hope in a few paragraphs you’ll see how truly twisted it is.
Most people who observe nature and humanity — the overwhelming majority of people walking the planet — learn some version of “If it ain’t broke, then don’t try to fix it.” Many religions teach this. Mattel Games Masters o... Buy New $7.52 (as of 12:32 UTC - Details)
Man is created in the image of God, but is fallen.
Man has perfection in him if he can find it.
All creation is of the Creator.
There can be a religious aspect to it, but there are also people who will have no religious reason for an “If it ain’t broke, then don’t try to fix it” view of man and nature.
A conservative might not like new government regulation when a private contract between two people works just fine in almost all scenarios.
A hippie might not see a doctor for 30 years because he doesn’t have a health problem and can’t imagine the benefit of exposing himself to big pharma’s salesman in his community, the local doctor.
A farmer might do the same, to the point where their politics may not converge, but their “If it ain’t broke, don’t try to fix it” sensibilities overlap perfectly.
An inner-city grandma might feel the exact same way.
An immigrant grandpa may as well.
The sensibility to just leave things alone and the humbleness required to say “It’s not perfect, but its good enough” is pervasive throughout American society and globally.
Then there are a different group of people. Cronus Zen Controller ... Best Price: $84.74 Buy New $98.85 (as of 12:07 UTC - Details)
That is the 5%, 10%, maybe even 20% who comprise the technocratic class and who either never learn that humbleness or learned to do away with that same sense of humbleness.
In that humbleness, “If it ain’t broke don’t try to fix it,” is a connectedness to reality that can seldom be spoken of by a technocrat, because they don’t really understand it.
If you mess with something that works, there’s a good chance you won’t be able to get it back to normal again.
That is true in many areas of life. The mechanic rarely gets your car as good as new. When he starts to play with one thing, something else starts to go, or he preemptively points out another thing that has lasted 8 years just fine, but is soon “about to go.”
Similarly, no matter what they say, the doctor never gets your hips as good as new, and heck, his bionic knee implants might feel better than the old arthritic things you knew, but their functionality is no comparison to the real thing.
Not until the doctor takes his own medicine and gets his own knees done will he come to understand what you mean when you say your knees aren’t as good as new. You might even be a little sore about it because that’s not the outcome you were told to be able to expect.
No, the technocrat makes a living out of ignoring reality and pretending that humbleness is a quaint term that does not apply to someone as well-intentioned and well-trained as him.
And there is the rub.
That is where idealism and reality conflict.
Yes, of course, the technocrat can mean well, but good intentions don’t go very far in reality.
Before setting into motion the harsh realities of cause and effect that are reality and life, nature doesn’t hit the pause button and ask “Did you mean to do that?” RUNMUS Gaming Headset ... Best Price: $35.07 Buy New $39.85 (as of 03:26 UTC - Details)
No, to the contrary, causes have effects, actions have consequences, and it is you that set those in motion.
Often, “I didn’t mean to,” will mean little in a situation where you should have known better.
The technocrat is he who should know better and instead resolves, to go through life suggesting implicitly and explicitly that outcomes are irrelevant and intentions are fundamental.
That’s some pretty serious Lala Land that a double-digit percentage of the Western population seeks to live in through their thoughts and actions.
And it is a largely Western concept: this professionalization of all and this rule by a technocratic class.
How divorced from reality it is. How refreshing reality can be when one is drowning in the mire of such cluelessness run amuck, as the idea that intentions matter and outcomes do not, which has so taken our culture by storm.
In the “If it ain’t broke, then don’t try to fix it,” sensibility of the world, it is before you try and fix something that your intentions still matter.
It is in the bedroom that you decide whether or not you want a baby.
It is in the courtship that you decide what kind of life you want ahead for you.
It is in the decision to snooze two more hours or rise, to make the bed or to leave it unkempt, to be diligent with your life or to be neglectful, that you demonstrate your intentions.
After you mess up grandma’s television set, grandma’s car, or grandma’s knees, is not the time to say “oops” and talk about intentions. Super Mario Maker 2 - ... Best Price: $38.99 Buy New $49.95 (as of 12:32 UTC - Details)
That’s how a weasel behaves and a forthright and decent person knows that intimately, which is why technocrats don’t get a lot of respect outside of the technocratic circles they travel in.
How many times have we all heard a technocrat explain that he is just — misunderstood?
Many. We just don’t realize it all that often, in the midst of their sophisticated ways of saying so.
Truth is, they aren’t misunderstood. Plenty of salt-of-the-earth people know perfectly well what a technocrat means to do. He means to ignore the wise “If it ain’t broken, then don’t try to fix it,” and then when his fix goes awry, he means to escape culpability by speaking about his intentions, and preparing everyone to trust his next fix, which he assures everyone is sure to work this time around.
If it were left at that, that might be acceptable, but it rarely is these days.
Rarely do technocrats let their ideas get challenged in the marketplace of ideas, to get evaluated, and then adopted by individuals freely or alternately ignored and perhaps derided by individuals freely.
No, many technocrats have no such sense of decency. Instead of trying to win in the marketplace of ideas — the territory of the free man and one of the joys of a free society — they figure out how to get a man with a badge and a gun involved.
Once that happens, even among the few generous people willing to give a technocrat a chance, all presumption of good intent must be done away with.
If their argument is so great, why would anyone need a billion dollar marketing budget and a half billion worth of armed and trained quasi-military civilian government commandos to get you to hear their good ideas?
That’s where we are in the year 2020.
Your wonderful immune system. Your wonderful body. Your wonderful ability to inhale and exhale. That can all be improved upon with a 10-cent polypropylene mask from Wuhan province. That’s what the technocrats assure us.
It is another example of lacking humility and the contact with reality provided by “If it ain’t broke, then don’t try to fix it.” Then there is the added idea that there is an even better way for the technocrat to improve life, even better than the “mandatory” face masks: just put everyone’s life on hold in mandatory lockdowns.
You salt-of-the-earth people weren’t doing anything all that special with your life anyway, were you?
Yes, in 2020, we all saw how sociopathic the technocrats got and saw it pretty quickly as they implemented “lockdowns for thee, but not for me,” and turned that crank tighter and tighter.
Why do technocrats advocate so ardently for face masks?
Because they know no humbleness and because they don’t comprehend the common decency of “If it ain’t broke, then don’t try to fix it.”
Your face is not broken. Your immune system is not broken. Your body is behaving just as it should. Buck the strange trends of our day and never again wear a face mask. The bestselling “Face Masks in One Lesson” by Allan Stevo guides you through many ways of accomplishing exactly that.
The Best of Allan Stevo


lewrockwell--2020-12-24--End the Great American Myth: We Want Secession, Not Revolution

I remember the 1970 ’ s driving around New York City with my family during the holidays like they were yesterday .
Back then the talk in the front seat of the car between my parents was New York City ’ s bankruptcy .
My dad , NYPD at the time , was as much a part of this as anyone since the Police pension fund helped bail out the city government back then .
The West Side Highway fell down and because of that I grew up with a fear of heights and , especially bridges .
I really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jersey ) into Staten Island .
The mere mention of the Outer Bridge crossing would nearly put me into a panic attack .
I remember thinking then , “ If these people can ’ t pay the bills now , what ’ s it going to be in ten or twenty years ?
” Sure , I was a naive ten or eleven at the time and had no idea about capital flight , but the sentiment was sound .
Even then the Emperor was naked to this child ’ s eyes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Sword of Damocles hung over the heads of my generation in ways we could barely articulate .
SNAPTAIN SP650 1080P D ... Best Price : $ 75.04 Buy New $ 89.99 So , for me , the idea of the U.S. breaking up into its component parts has been a constant companion most of my adult life .
And , as a libertarian , I always think in terms of secession first , rather than revolution .
It sits on my shoulder whispering in my ear the truth of what ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve reached a very important moment in world history .
It is that moment where the promises of classical liberalism are failing in the face of a creeping totalitarian nightmare .
America as mythology has always stood as the ‘ shining house on the hill ’ for this enlightened idea that the wishes of the individual pursuing his bliss creates the community and culture which lifts the world out of a Hobbesian State of Nature .
The war of all against all , ( bellum omnium contra omnes ) .
But America as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vastly different rough beasts .
And it is that difference between them that is being exploited today by The Davos Crowd to set the process in motion for their next victory .
Brandon Smith at Alt-Market brought up the trap conservatives are being led into today in his recent article .
He argues , quite persuasively , that the ‘ right ’ is being radicalized into thinking about an armed civil war to fight the corporatist left-wing useful idiots in an orgy of violence .
Nothing would give Klaus Schwab and The Davos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them — willing to use indiscriminate violence to push otherwise humble and decent people into crazed killers and repudiate their inherent meekness , their inherent desire to pursue their bliss , allowing everyone else that same courtesy .
But , leftism as practiced today , is aggressive .
It is rapacious and rests on the idea that no one can exist outside their preferred outcome lest anyone see their world for the nightmare it truly is .
Secession is not only not an option , it is expressly verboten .
I ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secession , is one very possible outcome of where the current political divide is taking us .
Brandon uses the situation in Germany in the 1920s/30s as his historical guide .
In short , Fascism rose to meet the violence of the Communists with the old monied elite providing the means for the conflict .
The parallels to today are striking .
In November ’ s issue of Gold Goats ‘ n Guns I likened the rising frustration of the American right to that of the Fremen Jihad of Frank Herbert ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who still believe in the Mythology of America , they are very susceptible to this programming .
That mythology is worth fighting for in their minds .
Brandon Smith , however , is making a finer point which I tend to agree with .
And that is that secession , not revolution , is always the better option rather than the pre-packaged violent one which the oligarchs always seem to prepare for us .
To broaden Brandon ’ s point , I want to challenge the precepts of that American mythology in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ religious war that is brewing .
There are two wars which bear most of the weight of that mythology — The American Revolution and the U.S. Civil War .
Fire HD 10 Tablet ( 10 ... .
Best Price : $ 99.99 Buy New $ 149.99 The first one is the good war .
It is the foundation of the mythology .
We know the narrative : brave colonials fought a war of independence , a war of secession , from the evil English .
It brought forth the Founding Fathers , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our shared American identity .
That mythology , while simplistic , held a core truth , that there are some things worth fighting for , when pushed to an extreme .
However , was 1770 ’ s America that extreme a place ?
Was war the only practical outcome ?
Or was it the dream of those men whose tolerance for tyranny shallower than the norm .
In other words , could America have seceded more peacefully in ten or twenty years ’ time ?
Viewed that way , this was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Colonies didn ’ t have to fight .
There may have been an equitable way out of conflict .
But the colonies chose war just as much as the Crown did if we ’ re being honest with ourselves .
The Civil War , on the other hand , is supposed to be the shameful one .
And from the Mythology side it truly is .
Lincoln ’ s war can only be characterized as a war to prevent secession in the same way that Crown fought to prevent the colonies from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the war we had to fight to prevent slavery ’ s survival into the 20th century .
But , was it that ?
Slavery may have been a dividing line to stoke the passions but it wasn ’ t the big factor driving the states apart , the Tariff of Abomination was .
Again , if we ’ re being honest with ourselves wasn ’ t Lincoln ’ s war where the ideals of the American Revolution – a compact between the sovereign states – were finally betrayed ?
Aren ’ t we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a Supreme Court who believes it has the power to ignore interstate grievances because none of the justices , even Thomas and Alito , believe in the compact of equals today ?
Remember , the South was more than willing to leave in peace .
And any reasons Lincoln had for fighting the war over the seizure of Federal property , i.e .
the proximate cause for the events at Fort Sumter , could have been worked out , again , equitably as gentlemen , rather than through the butchering of 600,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mythology Lincoln is the Great Uniter and Buchanan , his predecessor , the Worst President in History simply because he refused to either bail out the railroad banks in 1957 or prevent the South ’ s secession in 1860 .
What if the mythology of America today has these two wars backwards ?
What if all the conservatives mourning the Constitution today thanks to a feckless Supreme Court and treasonous Congress have it all wrong ?
What if the America they mourn the death of today died in 1865 not 2020 ?
Would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bloody civil war for ?
Because that ’ s what The Davos Crowd is daring Donald Trump to do .
What if the better response is to do what the South tried to do and failed .
Simply walk away and say , “ No more.
” Because fighting the bloody war of all against all , becoming raving fascists rising up to stop the rapacious ( and economically backwards ) communists in the process is always the wrong option .
Secession is always an option .
Opting out of the hyper-collectivizing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right choice .
They want us to throw the first punch , to lash out , fire first out of fear , c.f .
Fort Sumter , to justify their brutality afterwards .
But , as I said in the quote above , the states with the grievances today are the ones that produce the wealth of this fiction known as the U.S.
It ’ s where the food is grown , the electricity generated , the goods produced and people aren ’ t shitting in the streets .
The food lines may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s still food to distribute .
The balance of power in the U.S. today in real terms is reverse of what existed in 1860 .
Post-Trump America looks a lot different than pre-Lincoln .
Because of that and the reality that the people pulling off this great coup against sanity are some of the most unimpressive leaders in history , the potential for a successful secession is far higher than it was for the Confederacy .
Brandon Smith is right that they invoke the Confederacy to shame conservatives as racists , conflating issues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history .
This is why the all-out assault on the history of the war , whitewashing it of any nuance .
Theirs is a mind-virus that grows beyond the ability of the oligarchy to control .
And it is truly best to not just walk but run away from such people .
Better to let them sink into their own cesspit of ideological rabbit holes while keeping the lines of trade open , if they have anything worth selling , of course .
They will turn on themselves soon enough .
Having grown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Southerner I ’ ve seen this descent of the American mythology from both perspectives .
The eleven year-old me knew this day would come .
The Mythology of America is just that , mythology , worth using as the basis for the new story rather than a shackle keeping us chained down , staring at the Abyss and despairing at what was lost .
New York was a dream not a fixture in the night sky .
God didn ’ t put his finger on the Empire State Building and spin the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it to ever stay in balance , even if he did .
And California is one bad day away from Big One which washes it from our memory .
The Best of Thomas Luongo

I remember the 1970’s driving around New York City with my family during the holidays like they were yesterday.
Back then the talk in the front seat of the car between my parents was New York City’s bankruptcy. My dad, NYPD at the time, was as much a part of this as anyone since the Police pension fund helped bail out the city government back then.
The West Side Highway fell down and because of that I grew up with a fear of heights and, especially bridges. I really hated taking the back way (New Jersey) into Staten Island. The mere mention of the Outer Bridge crossing would nearly put me into a panic attack.
I remember thinking then, “If these people can’t pay the bills now, what’s it going to be in ten or twenty years?” Sure, I was a naive ten or eleven at the time and had no idea about capital flight, but the sentiment was sound.
Even then the Emperor was naked to this child’s eyes. This was Rome near the end and the Sword of Damocles hung over the heads of my generation in ways we could barely articulate. SNAPTAIN SP650 1080P D... Best Price: $75.04 Buy New $89.99 (as of 07:11 UTC - Details)
So, for me, the idea of the U.S. breaking up into its component parts has been a constant companion most of my adult life. And, as a libertarian, I always think in terms of secession first, rather than revolution. It sits on my shoulder whispering in my ear the truth of what’s in front of us.
We’ve reached a very important moment in world history. It is that moment where the promises of classical liberalism are failing in the face of a creeping totalitarian nightmare.
America as mythology has always stood as the ‘shining house on the hill’ for this enlightened idea that the wishes of the individual pursuing his bliss creates the community and culture which lifts the world out of a Hobbesian State of Nature.
The war of all against all, (bellum omnium contra omnes).
But America as Mythology and America as Reality are two vastly different rough beasts. And it is that difference between them that is being exploited today by The Davos Crowd to set the process in motion for their next victory.
Brandon Smith at Alt-Market brought up the trap conservatives are being led into today in his recent article. He argues, quite persuasively, that the ‘right’ is being radicalized into thinking about an armed civil war to fight the corporatist left-wing useful idiots in an orgy of violence.
To be clear, what I believe is happening is that conservatives are being prodded and provoked, not to separate and organize but to centralize. I think they want us to support actions like martial law which would be considered totalitarian. Conservatives, the only stalwart defenders of civil liberties, using military suppression and abandoning the Bill of Rights to maintain political power? That is a dream come true for the globalists in the long term. And despite people’s faith in Trump, there are far too many banking elites and globalists within his cabinet to ensure that such power will not be abused or used against us later.
Nothing would give Klaus Schwab and The Davos Crowd more pleasure than turning us into them — willing to use indiscriminate violence to push otherwise humble and decent people into crazed killers and repudiate their inherent meekness, their inherent desire to pursue their bliss, allowing everyone else that same courtesy.
But, leftism as practiced today, is aggressive. It is rapacious and rests on the idea that no one can exist outside their preferred outcome lest anyone see their world for the nightmare it truly is.
Secession is not only not an option, it is expressly verboten.
I’ve made the argument that violence, not secession, is one very possible outcome of where the current political divide is taking us. Brandon uses the situation in Germany in the 1920s/30s as his historical guide. In short, Fascism rose to meet the violence of the Communists with the old monied elite providing the means for the conflict.
The parallels to today are striking. In November’s issue of Gold Goats ‘n Guns I likened the rising frustration of the American right to that of the Fremen Jihad of Frank Herbert’s classic Dune.
When you marginalize the tens of millions of people who produce the goods which sustain their false reality, when you remove their ability to speak their mind and make their voices heard, when you insult them, berate them, hector them and beat them then you will bear the consequences when the sleeper awakens, in Herbert’s words. This isn’t a threat or an open letter of defiance. This is an observation of what always comes next. These people know that they have been lied to, their children spiritually separated from them. The election was a cruel joke meant to rub our noses in their complete power over us. You can
see it every day on Twitter. What comes next will benothing short of a Fremenesque jihad by the 70+ million people who voted for Donald Trump. If his allies prove the systematic thievery of the election it will fuel a simmering anger to boiling over into a near-religious frenzy.
Because these are people who still believe in the Mythology of America, they are very susceptible to this programming. That mythology is worth fighting for in their minds.
Brandon Smith, however, is making a finer point which I tend to agree with. And that is that secession, not revolution, is always the better option rather than the pre-packaged violent one which the oligarchs always seem to prepare for us.
To broaden Brandon’s point, I want to challenge the precepts of that American mythology in the hope we can avoid the kind of religious war that is brewing.
There are two wars which bear most of the weight of that mythology — The American Revolution and the U.S. Civil War. Fire HD 10 Tablet (10.... Check Amazon for Pricing.
The first one is the good war. It is the foundation of the mythology. We know the narrative: brave colonials fought a war of independence, a war of secession, from the evil English. It brought forth the Founding Fathers, the Declaration of Independence and all the symbology of our shared American identity.
That mythology, while simplistic, held a core truth, that there are some things worth fighting for, when pushed to an extreme.
However, was 1770’s America that extreme a place? Was war the only practical outcome? Or was it the dream of those men whose tolerance for tyranny shallower than the norm. In other words, could America have seceded more peacefully in ten or twenty years’ time?
Viewed that way, this was a war of secession that the English and the Colonies didn’t have to fight. There may have been an equitable way out of conflict. But the colonies chose war just as much as the Crown did if we’re being honest with ourselves.
The Civil War, on the other hand, is supposed to be the shameful one. And from the Mythology side it truly is. Lincoln’s war can only be characterized as a war to prevent secession in the same way that Crown fought to prevent the colonies from seceding.
The mythology states this was the war we had to fight to prevent slavery’s survival into the 20th century. But, was it that? Slavery may have been a dividing line to stoke the passions but it wasn’t the big factor driving the states apart, the Tariff of Abomination was.
Again, if we’re being honest with ourselves wasn’t Lincoln’s war where the ideals of the American Revolution – a compact between the sovereign states – were finally betrayed?
Aren’t we reaping the whirlwind of that war today with a Supreme Court who believes it has the power to ignore interstate grievances because none of the justices, even Thomas and Alito, believe in the compact of equals today?
Remember, the South was more than willing to leave in peace. And any reasons Lincoln had for fighting the war over the seizure of Federal property, i.e. the proximate cause for the events at Fort Sumter, could have been worked out, again, equitably as gentlemen, rather than through the butchering of 600,000 Americans over four years.
From the Mythology Lincoln is the Great Uniter and Buchanan, his predecessor, the Worst President in History simply because he refused to either bail out the railroad banks in 1957 or prevent the South’s secession in 1860.
What if the mythology of America today has these two wars backwards? What if all the conservatives mourning the Constitution today thanks to a feckless Supreme Court and treasonous Congress have it all wrong? What if the America they mourn the death of today died in 1865 not 2020?
Would that America still be worth finally fighting a bloody civil war for? Because that’s what The Davos Crowd is daring Donald Trump to do.
What if the better response is to do what the South tried to do and failed.
Simply walk away and say, “No more.”
Because fighting the bloody war of all against all, becoming raving fascists rising up to stop the rapacious (and economically backwards) communists in the process is always the wrong option.
Secession is always an option. Opting out of the hyper-collectivizing impulses of in-group/out-group bias is always the right choice. They want us to throw the first punch, to lash out, fire first out of fear, c.f. Fort Sumter, to justify their brutality afterwards.
But, as I said in the quote above, the states with the grievances today are the ones that produce the wealth of this fiction known as the U.S. It’s where the food is grown, the electricity generated, the goods produced and people aren’t shitting in the streets.
The food lines may be long in Texas but there’s still food to distribute.
The balance of power in the U.S. today in real terms is reverse of what existed in 1860. Post-Trump America looks a lot different than pre-Lincoln.
Because of that and the reality that the people pulling off this great coup against sanity are some of the most unimpressive leaders in history, the potential for a successful secession is far higher than it was for the Confederacy.
Brandon Smith is right that they invoke the Confederacy to shame conservatives as racists, conflating issues separated by more than 150 years of history. This is why the all-out assault on the history of the war, whitewashing it of any nuance.
Theirs is a mind-virus that grows beyond the ability of the oligarchy to control. And it is truly best to not just walk but run away from such people. Better to let them sink into their own cesspit of ideological rabbit holes while keeping the lines of trade open, if they have anything worth selling, of course.
They will turn on themselves soon enough.
Having grown up a Yankee and matured as a Southerner I’ve seen this descent of the American mythology from both perspectives. The eleven year-old me knew this day would come.
The Mythology of America is just that, mythology, worth using as the basis for the new story rather than a shackle keeping us chained down, staring at the Abyss and despairing at what was lost.
New York was a dream not a fixture in the night sky. God didn’t put his finger on the Empire State Building and spin the world.
Because Texas was too big for it to ever stay in balance, even if he did. And California is one bad day away from Big One which washes it from our memory.
Reprinted with permission from Gold Goats ‘n Guns.
The Best of Tom Luongo


lewrockwell--2020-12-24--Rich Millennials Plot the End of Civilization

The New York Times managed to find some young people whose silver spoons provide a sour taste in their mouths .
To hear them talk , their good fortune is making them sick .
“ I want to build a world where someone like me , a young person who controls tens of millions of dollars , is impossible , ” Sam Jacobs , 25 , told the Times .
Jacobs went off to college a normal young man and came back a socialist .
Suddenly his family ’ s “ extreme , plutocratic wealth ” became too much of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wants to put his inheritance toward ending capitalism , ” Zoë Beery wrote for the NYT , “ and by that he means using his money to undo systems that accumulate money for those at the top , and that have played a large role in widening economic and racial inequality.
” Wow , that is some self-loathing .
If only Ludwig von Mises were able to counsel young Jacobs , whose grandfather founded Qualcomm and who is set to inherit $ 100 million .
In his book Epistemological Problems of Economics , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changes in the prevailing system of social stratification , moral philosophers continued to hold fast to the fundamental idea of Cicero ’ s doctrine that making money is degrading.
” Yoshi ’ s Crafted ... Best Price : $ 38.99 Buy New $ 39.30 Beery writes that wealth is concentrated in the upper brackets and “ Millennials will be the recipients of the largest generational shift of assets in American history.
” That doesn ’ t seem like a worrying thought ; however , it is for Rachel Gelman , a thirty-year-old in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politics to Beery as “ anticapitalist , anti-imperialist and abolitionist.
” “ My money is mostly stocks , which means it comes from underpaying and undervaluing working-class people , and that ’ s impossible to disconnect from the economic legacies of Indigenous genocide and slavery , ” the guilty Gelman said .
“ Once I realized that , I couldn ’ t imagine doing anything with my wealth besides redistribute it to these communities.
” Mises saw it differently .
“ The riches of the rich are not the cause of the poverty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some people rich is , on the contrary , the corollary of the process that improves many peoples ’ want satisfaction .
The entrepreneurs , the capitalists and the technologists prosper as far as they succeed in best supplying the consumers , ” he wrote in The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality .
Elizabeth Baldwin is a thirty-four-year-old democratic socialist in Cambridge , Massachusetts , who was adopted from India by a white family when she was a baby .
Now , thanks to her adoptive parents , she is wealthy , with a stock portfolio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But , she hates the thought of having her wealth tied up in multinational corporation shares and instead “ would rather put my money into a community that has been denied economic resources and disrupts the system.
” PlayMonster Relative I ... Buy New $ 19.99 She ’ s directing her funds toward what she and other wealthy millennials describe as the “ solidarity economy.
” Fellow traveler and democratic socialist , Emma Thomas , a twenty-nine-year-old , described what she ’ s now investing in as “ an economy that is about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is cooperative and sustainable , and that doesn ’ t demand unfettered growth.
” “ At some point , these numbers on a screen are imaginary , ” Thomas told the Times .
“ But what ’ s not imaginary is whether you have shelter , food and a community .
Those are true returns.
” Where do these ideas come from ?
University faculty , of course .
Richard D. Wolff , a Marxist and an emeritus economics professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst said he has been professionally arguing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his teaching career began , in 1967 , but that his millennial students “ are more open to hearing that message than their parents ever were.
” We can only thank goodness the parents of these young people believed in serving customers and saving their wealth .
This wealth was not created nefariously .
As Murray Rothbard explained , “ On the free market , it is a happy fact that the maximization of the wealth of one person or group redounds to the benefit of all.
” What these millennials are up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As Mises wrote in his book Liberalism , “ Modern civilization will not perish unless it does so by its own act of self-destruction.
” Note : The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute .
The Best of Douglas French

The New York Times managed to find some young people whose silver spoons provide a sour taste in their mouths. To hear them talk, their good fortune is making them sick.
“I want to build a world where someone like me, a young person who controls tens of millions of dollars, is impossible,” Sam Jacobs, 25, told the Times. Jacobs went off to college a normal young man and came back a socialist. Suddenly his family’s “extreme, plutocratic wealth” became too much of a burden for him.
“He wants to put his inheritance toward ending capitalism,” Zoë Beery wrote for the NYT, “and by that he means using his money to undo systems that accumulate money for those at the top, and that have played a large role in widening economic and racial inequality.”
Wow, that is some self-loathing. If only Ludwig von Mises were able to counsel young Jacobs, whose grandfather founded Qualcomm and who is set to inherit $100 million. In his book Epistemological Problems of Economics, Mises wrote, “Through all the changes in the prevailing system of social stratification, moral philosophers continued to hold fast to the fundamental idea of Cicero’s doctrine that making money is degrading.” Yoshi’s Crafted ... Best Price: $36.99 Buy New $44.00 (as of 12:32 UTC - Details)
Beery writes that wealth is concentrated in the upper brackets and “Millennials will be the recipients of the largest generational shift of assets in American history.”
That doesn’t seem like a worrying thought; however, it is for Rachel Gelman, a thirty-year-old in Oakland, California, who described her politics to Beery as “anticapitalist, anti-imperialist and abolitionist.”
“My money is mostly stocks, which means it comes from underpaying and undervaluing working-class people, and that’s impossible to disconnect from the economic legacies of Indigenous genocide and slavery,” the guilty Gelman said. “Once I realized that, I couldn’t imagine doing anything with my wealth besides redistribute it to these communities.”
Mises saw it differently. “The riches of the rich are not the cause of the poverty of anybody; the process that makes some people rich is, on the contrary, the corollary of the process that improves many peoples’ want satisfaction. The entrepreneurs, the capitalists and the technologists prosper as far as they succeed in best supplying the consumers,” he wrote in The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality.
Elizabeth Baldwin is a thirty-four-year-old democratic socialist in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who was adopted from India by a white family when she was a baby. Now, thanks to her adoptive parents, she is wealthy, with a stock portfolio containing shares in Coca-Cola and Exxon-Mobil.
But, she hates the thought of having her wealth tied up in multinational corporation shares and instead “would rather put my money into a community that has been denied economic resources and disrupts the system.”
Relative Insanity Amaz... Buy New $9.45 (as of 12:37 UTC - Details) She’s directing her funds toward what she and other wealthy millennials describe as the “solidarity economy.” Fellow traveler and democratic socialist, Emma Thomas, a twenty-nine-year-old, described what she’s now investing in as “an economy that is about exchange and taking care of needs, that is cooperative and sustainable, and that doesn’t demand unfettered growth.”
“At some point, these numbers on a screen are imaginary,” Thomas told the Times. “But what’s not imaginary is whether you have shelter, food and a community. Those are true returns.”
Where do these ideas come from? University faculty, of course. Richard D. Wolff, a Marxist and an emeritus economics professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst said he has been professionally arguing against capitalism’s selling points since his teaching career began, in 1967, but that his millennial students “are more open to hearing that message than their parents ever were.”
We can only thank goodness the parents of these young people believed in serving customers and saving their wealth. This wealth was not created nefariously. As Murray Rothbard explained, “On the free market, it is a happy fact that the maximization of the wealth of one person or group redounds to the benefit of all.”
What these millennials are up to is not to be ignored. As Mises wrote in his book Liberalism, “Modern civilization will not perish unless it does so by its own act of self-destruction.”
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
The Best of Douglas French


lewrockwell--2020-12-24--Just Trust ‘Em! … Because You Can’t Sue ‘Em

You can ’ t walk into a store without wearing the Holy Rag – because someone might get sick .
But if you actually get sick as a result of being forced to take the Holy Jab , you can ’ t sue the company that made the god-knows-what ’ s-in-it vaccine .
Which is pretty sick when you think about it .
The pharmaceutical mafia can force you – via its enforcer , the government – to take its products ; vaccines are already required for kids in many states and if you don ’ t submit to it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
.
and then walk away from any harm caused because the government protects the pharmaceutical mafia from you .
Thus one-upping the health insurance mafia .
.
.
which only forces you to buy its product .
Collective Minds Strik ... Best Price : $ 33.21 Buy New $ 37.74 The vaccine-pushers are uniquely endowed with government-granted immunity from lawsuits .
They can wreck your life – and you get the bill .
This is almost beyond belief – especially in view of the fact that they are for-profit enterprises , meaning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the suffering they impose on people who can ’ t say no to the Jab .
Jabs , actually – as it ’ s not just one – and not just this one .
There will be at least two Holy Jabs and then – having established the precedent that they can make you take those jabs , why not other jabs ?
All the risk – which you won ’ t be allowed to say no to – on you .
All the profits for them .
Where are the Public Citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are the investigative i-Team reporters ?
They ’ re out there .
The problem is they ’ ve been bought – literally .
And sometimes you get what you pay for .
Ask your doctor about Nemenda .
Don ’ t tell the audience anything about what Nemenda might do to you ( cue the super-fast-talking dude who gets paid to read the fine print at warp speed ) .
Else we – the drug-pushers – might pull our ads .
The Best of Eric Peters

You can’t walk into a store without wearing the Holy Rag – because someone might get sick. But if you actually get sick as a result of being forced to take the Holy Jab, you can’t sue the company that made the god-knows-what’s-in-it vaccine.
Which is pretty sick when you think about it.
The pharmaceutical mafia can force you – via its enforcer, the government – to take its products; vaccines are already required for kids in many states and if you don’t submit to it the state can take your kids . . . and then walk away from any harm caused because the government protects the pharmaceutical mafia from you.
Thus one-upping the health insurance mafia . . . which only forces you to buy its product.
Collective Minds Strik... Best Price: $33.85 Buy New $39.98 (as of 02:32 UTC - Details) The vaccine-pushers are uniquely endowed with government-granted immunity from lawsuits. They can wreck your life – and you get the bill.
This is almost beyond belief – especially in view of the fact that they are for-profit enterprises, meaning they can literally get rich off of the suffering they impose on people who can’t say no to the Jab.
Jabs, actually – as it’s not just one – and not just this one. There will be at least two Holy Jabs and then – having established the precedent that they can make you take those jabs, why not other jabs?
All the risk – which you won’t be allowed to say no to – on you.
All the profits for them.
Where are the Public Citizens and “consumer advocates”? Where are the investigative i-Team reporters?
They’re out there. The problem is they’ve been bought – literally. And sometimes you get what you pay for. Ask your doctor about Nemenda.
Don’t tell the audience anything about what Nemenda might do to you (cue the super-fast-talking dude who gets paid to read the fine print at warp speed).
Else we – the drug-pushers – might pull our ads.
Read the Whole Article
The Best of Eric Peters


Science Versus Scientism

Science is good but scientism isn ’ t .
Science looks at the cosmos objectively , indeed scientifically .
Scientism doesn ’ t .
Science , in the broadest sense of the word , derived from the Latin scientia , simply means “ knowledge.
” In this sense , all branches of knowledge can be considered as science .
Philosophy is a science , history is a science , theology is a science , et cetera .
In the more narrow sense , which is the way the modern world uses the word , science is limited to knowledge of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and objectively .
This form of science would have been what Aristotle called physics , to distinguish it from the other forms of scientia , i.e .
metaphysics and mathematics , or what the mediaevals would have called natural philosophy , i.e .
the love of wisdom to be learned from nature .
Science is good , whether we understand it in the older , broader sense of the word or the newer , narrower sense .
Scientism , on the other hand , is not good , not least because it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Sinfox Mobile Game Con ... Buy New $ 35.99 Scientism is a dogmatic ideology which presumes that “ science , ” in the narrower sense of the word , has the answers to all questions .
For believers in scientism the claims of metaphysics are invalid and have no bearing on reality .
The physical cosmos is all there is .
There is nothing but three dimensions ( or four if we include time as a dimension ) which are perceived with our five senses .
This is all there is and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studying .
The problem with scientism , or one of its many problems , is that it tends to be prejudiced and therefore not very scientific .
Take , for instance , the scientistic view of our ancient ancestors .
There is a presumption that the so-called cave man was brutish or even bestial .
G. K. Chesterton , in The Everlasting Man , alludes to the so-called scientific view of the club-wielding cave man whose primary occupation was beating his wife over the head and dragging her around by the hair .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ very scientific because it was based on a prejudiced presumption about the nature of “ primitive ” man and not on any actual evidence .
Chesterton bemoaned that “ people have been interested in everything about the cave-man except what he did in the cave.
” The evidence was “ little enough ” , Chesterton conceded , “ but it is concerned with the real cave-man and his cave and not the literary cave-man and his club.
” Insisting that we remain truly scientific , Chesterton reminds us that “ it will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consider quite simply what the real evidence is , and not go beyond it .
”

Science is good but scientism isn’t. Science looks at the cosmos objectively, indeed scientifically. Scientism doesn’t.
Science, in the broadest sense of the word, derived from the Latin scientia, simply means “knowledge.” In this sense, all branches of knowledge can be considered as science. Philosophy is a science, history is a science, theology is a science, et cetera. In the more narrow sense, which is the way the modern world uses the word, science is limited to knowledge of the physical cosmos, as observed empirically and objectively. This form of science would have been what Aristotle called physics, to distinguish it from the other forms of scientia, i.e. metaphysics and mathematics, or what the mediaevals would have called natural philosophy, i.e. the love of wisdom to be learned from nature.
Science is good, whether we understand it in the older, broader sense of the word or the newer, narrower sense. Scientism, on the other hand, is not good, not least because it is not science.
So what is scientism? Sinfox Mobile Game Con... Check Amazon for Pricing.
Scientism is a dogmatic ideology which presumes that “science,” in the narrower sense of the word, has the answers to all questions. For believers in scientism the claims of metaphysics are invalid and have no bearing on reality. The physical cosmos is all there is. There is nothing but three dimensions (or four if we include time as a dimension) which are perceived with our five senses. This is all there is and this is therefore all that is worth studying.
The problem with scientism, or one of its many problems, is that it tends to be prejudiced and therefore not very scientific. Take, for instance, the scientistic view of our ancient ancestors. There is a presumption that the so-called cave man was brutish or even bestial. G. K. Chesterton, in The Everlasting Man, alludes to the so-called scientific view of the club-wielding cave man whose primary occupation was beating his wife over the head and dragging her around by the hair. Yet such “science” was not very scientific because it was based on a prejudiced presumption about the nature of “primitive” man and not on any actual evidence. Chesterton bemoaned that “people have been interested in everything about the cave-man except what he did in the cave.” The evidence was “little enough”, Chesterton conceded, “but it is concerned with the real cave-man and his cave and not the literary cave-man and his club.” Insisting that we remain truly scientific, Chesterton reminds us that “it will be valuable to our sense of reality to consider quite simply what the real evidence is, and not go beyond it.”
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-12-24--The Catholic Case for Secession?

The Catholic Case for Secession?

Ever since “ red states ” and “ blue states ” entered our popular lexicon in the weeks following the 2000 election , Americans have understood that our country ’ s citizens have taken two divergent paths at the fork in the road .
Twenty years later , the possibility that those paths will converge one day seems more and more remote .
That is why a word that has long been forbidden in American discourse has gained traction in recent years : secession .
In most Americans ’ minds , “ secession ” conjures up images of the Civil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It represents the darkest and bloodiest hour of our nation ’ s history , when families were divided and brother fought against brother .
Because the term is linked in our minds to a long and nearly crippling war , we naturally recoil at the idea of secession .
Additionally , the mythology subconsciously espoused by many Americans that our country is divinely ordained to extend freedom throughout the world makes the suggestion that America could decrease in size unfathomable to most of us.+ Razer DeathAdder V2 Ga ... Best Price : $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people are now talking seriously about the possibility of secession .
The proximate cause is the shenanigans associated with the most recent presidential election .
A large number of Americans believe that the candidate likely to be sworn in on January 20 , 2021 was the beneficiary of fraud on a large scale .
If this is the case , then the political system is fundamentally broken ; an increasing number of Americans are questioning the efficacy of continuing the charade of a united country .
So , can a Catholic support the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take a step back first .
Is secession legal ?
One of the greatest American Catholic legal minds , Antonin Scalia , argued that it is not .
“ If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War , ” he wrote , “ it is that there is no right to secede.
” With all due respect to the late Justice Scalia , and with a little trepidation about contradicting him , this makes no sense .
When one political body secedes from another , the seceding body is rejecting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other words , all laws in effect in the original nation are no longer applicable to the seceding nation , since it is no longer part of that original nation .
Asking if secession is legal , then , is actually nonsensical , for the people seceding do not recognize the laws of the original country .
LEGO Batman 3 : Beyond ... Best Price : $ 11.91 Buy New $ 14.99 But even if it ’ s “ legal , ” is it moral ?
Because Americans equate secession with a bloody @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you support secession , you support needless bloodshed .
But bloodshed is not a foregone conclusion .
In the early 1990s , fifteen Soviet republics seceded from the Soviet Union without a civil war .
In 1965 , Singapore separated from Malaysia without sparking a violent conflict .
Other examples are littered throughout history , particularly recent history .
Secession can be peaceful , and it is peaceful secession that I am considering here .
From a Catholic point of view , the benefits of secession include new opportunities for legal protection of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflict , and more robust subsidiarity .
Secession would provide better prospects for legal protection of the unborn .
Some Catholics argue that abandoning the union would be abandoning the unborn in the new leftist/socialist nation-states that would be formed .
If California , for example , were to leave the union , it ’ s unlikely it would ever restrict abortion in any way .

Ever since “red states” and “blue states” entered our popular lexicon in the weeks following the 2000 election, Americans have understood that our country’s citizens have taken two divergent paths at the fork in the road. Twenty years later, the possibility that those paths will converge one day seems more and more remote. That is why a word that has long been forbidden in American discourse has gained traction in recent years: secession.
In most Americans’ minds, “secession” conjures up images of the Civil War, slavery, and racism. It represents the darkest and bloodiest hour of our nation’s history, when families were divided and brother fought against brother. Because the term is linked in our minds to a long and nearly crippling war, we naturally recoil at the idea of secession. Additionally, the mythology subconsciously espoused by many Americans that our country is divinely ordained to extend freedom throughout the world makes the suggestion that America could decrease in size unfathomable to most of us.+
Razer DeathAdder V2 Ga... Best Price: $90.00 (as of 12:37 UTC - Details) Yet, people are now talking seriously about the possibility of secession. The proximate cause is the shenanigans associated with the most recent presidential election. A large number of Americans believe that the candidate likely to be sworn in on January 20, 2021 was the beneficiary of fraud on a large scale. If this is the case, then the political system is fundamentally broken; an increasing number of Americans are questioning the efficacy of continuing the charade of a united country.
So, can a Catholic support the idea of secession?
Let’s take a step back first. Is secession legal? One of the greatest American Catholic legal minds, Antonin Scalia, argued that it is not. “If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War,” he wrote, “it is that there is no right to secede.” With all due respect to the late Justice Scalia, and with a little trepidation about contradicting him, this makes no sense. When one political body secedes from another, the seceding body is rejecting the authority of the first. In other words, all laws in effect in the original nation are no longer applicable to the seceding nation, since it is no longer part of that original nation. Asking if secession is legal, then, is actually nonsensical, for the people seceding do not recognize the laws of the original country.
LEGO Batman 3: Beyond ... Best Price: $8.00 Buy New $19.75 (as of 12:47 UTC - Details) But even if it’s “legal,” is it moral? Because Americans equate secession with a bloody civil war, many argue that if you support secession, you support needless bloodshed. But bloodshed is not a foregone conclusion. In the early 1990s, fifteen Soviet republics seceded from the Soviet Union without a civil war. In 1965, Singapore separated from Malaysia without sparking a violent conflict. Other examples are littered throughout history, particularly recent history. Secession can be peaceful, and it is peaceful secession that I am considering here.
From a Catholic point of view, the benefits of secession include new opportunities for legal protection of the unborn, reduced cultural and political conflict, and more robust subsidiarity.
Secession would provide better prospects for legal protection of the unborn. Some Catholics argue that abandoning the union would be abandoning the unborn in the new leftist/socialist nation-states that would be formed. If California, for example, were to leave the union, it’s unlikely it would ever restrict abortion in any way.
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-12-24--Unexplained Explosion and Fire Destroy World’s Second Largest Pharmaceutical Factory Producing Precu

Unexplained Explosion and Fire Destroy World’s Second Largest Pharmaceutical Factory Producing Precursors for Hydroxychloroquine

Prepare for supplies to tighten for the cheap , effective therapeutic treatment for early stage Covid-19 infection , hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) .
Just as the medical establishment in the US is relaxing its absurd and lethal suppression of the cheap , generic drug , following President Trump ’ s endorsement of it early in the pandemic , HCQ ’ s continued availability may suffer .
The world ’ s second largest pharmaceutical facility producing the precursors for HCQ has been destroyed by an explosion and fire .
An explosion at a pharmaceutical factory in Taoyuan City left two injured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , December 20 .
Fire 7 tablet ( 7 & rdquo ... Buy New $ 49.99 People as far as Tamsui District in New Taipei City reported hearing the massive blast shortly after noon .
Immediately after the blast , thick black smoke could be seen pouring out of the SCI Pharmtech factory .
( snip ) The cause of the explosion is currently under investigation .
Liberty Times reported that the factory produces hydroxychloroquine APIs [ active pharmaceutical ingredients – TL ] , and is the world ’ s second largest HCQ @ @ @ @

Prepare for supplies to tighten for the cheap, effective therapeutic treatment for early stage Covid-19 infection, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Just as the medical establishment in the US is relaxing its absurd and lethal suppression of the cheap, generic drug, following President Trump’s endorsement of it early in the pandemic, HCQ’s continued availability may suffer. The world’s second largest pharmaceutical facility producing the precursors for HCQ has been destroyed by an explosion and fire.
Taiwan English News reports:
An explosion at a pharmaceutical factory in Taoyuan City left two injured and caused a fire early this afternoon, December 20. Fire 7 tablet, 7&rdquo... Check Amazon for Pricing.
People as far as Tamsui District in New Taipei City reported hearing the massive blast shortly after noon. Immediately after the blast, thick black smoke could be seen pouring out of the SCI Pharmtech factory. (snip)
The cause of the explosion is currently under investigation.
Liberty Times reported that the factory produces hydroxychloroquine APIs [active pharmaceutical ingredients – TL], and is the world’s second largest HCQ raw material supplier.