lewrockwell--2020-09-21--Hyperinflation, Fascism, and War: How the New World Order May Be Defeated Once More

While the world ’ s attention is absorbed by tectonic shifts unfolding across America as “ a perfect storm of civil war , and military coup threatens to undo both the elections and the very foundations of the republic itself , something very ominous has appeared “ off of the radar ” of most onlookers .
This something is a financial collapse of the trans-Atlantic banks that threatens to unleash chaos upon the world .
It is this collapse that underlies the desperate efforts being made by the neo-con drive for total war with Russia , China and other members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In recent articles , I have mentioned that the Bank of England-led “ solution ” to this oncoming financial blowout of the $ 1.5 quadrillion derivatives bubble is being pushed under the cover of a “ Great Global Reset ” which is an ugly and desperate effort to use COVID-19 as a cover for the imposition of a new post-covid world order operating system .
Since the new “ rules ” of this new system are very similar to the 1923 Bank of England “ solution ” to Germany ’ s economic chaos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to impose it onto the masses , I wish to take a deeper look at the causes and effects of Weimar Germany ’ s completely un-necessary collapse into hyperinflation and chaos during the period of 1919-1923 .
Legendary Whitetails M ... Buy New $ 79.99 In this essay , I will go further to examine how those same architects of hyperfinflation came close to establishing a global bankers ’ dictatorship in 1933 and how that early attempt at a New World Order was fortunately derailed through a bold fight which has been written @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will investigate in depth how a major war broke out within America led by anti-imperial patriots in opposition to the forces of Wall Street and London ’ s Deep State and we will examine how this clash of paradigms came to a head in 1943-1945 .
This historical study is not being conducted for entertainment , nor should this be seen as a purely academic exercise , but is being created for the simple fact that the world is coming to a total systemic meltdown and unless certain suppressed facts of 20th century @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those forces who have destroyed our collective memory of what we once were will remain in the drivers seat as society is carried into a new age of fascism and world war .
Versailles and the Destruction of Germany Britain had been the leading hand behind the orchestration of WWI and the destruction of the potential German-Russian-American-Ottoman alliance that had begun to take form by the late 19th century as foolish Kaiser Wilhelm discovered ( though sadly too late ) when he said : “ the world will be engulfed in the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of which is the ruin of Germany .
England , France and Russia have conspired for our annihilation… that is the naked truth of the situation which was slowly but surely created by Edward VII ” .
Just as the British oligarchy managed the war , so too did they organize the reparations conference in France which , among other things , imposed impossible debt repayments upon a defeated Germany and created the League of Nations which was meant to become the instrument for a “ post-nation state world order ” .
Lloyd @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assistant Philip Kerr ( Lord Lothian ) , Leo Amery , Lord Robert Cecil and Lord John Maynard Keynes who have a long term agenda to bring about a global dictatorship .
All of these figures were members of the newly emerging Round Table Movement , that had taken full control of Britain by ousting Asquith in 1916 , and which is at the heart of today ’ s “ deep state ” .
After the 1918 Armistice dismantled Germany ’ s army and navy , the once powerful nation was now forced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billion gold marks to the victors and had to give up territories representing 10 % of its population ( Alsace-Loraine , Ruhr , and North Silesia ) which made up 15 % of its arable land , 12 % of its livestock , 74 % of its iron ore , 63 % of its zinc production , and 26 % of its coal .
Germany also had to give up 8000 locomotives , 225 000 railcars and all of its colonies .
It was a field day of modern pillage .
Germany was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were increased and imports were cut entirely while exports were increased .
This policy ( reminiscent of the IMF austerity techniques in use today ) failed entirely as both fell 60 % .
Germany gave up half of its gold supply and still barely a dent was made in the debt payments .
By June 1920 the decision was made to begin a new strategy : increase the printing press .
Rather than the “ miracle cure ” which desperate monetarists foolishly believed it would be , this solution resulted in an asymptotic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ From June 1920 to October 1923 the money supply in circulation skyrocketed from 68.1 gold marks to 496.6 quintillion gold marks .
In June 1922 , 300 marks exchanged $ 1 US and in November 1923 , it took 42 trillion marks to get $ 1 US !
Images are still available of Germans pushing wheelbarrows of cash down the street , just to buy a stick of butter and bread ( 1Kg of Bread sold for $ 428 billion marks in 1923 ) .
With the currency ’ s loss of value @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , unemployment rose to over 30 % and food intake collapsed by over half of pre-war levels .
German director Fritz Lang ’ s 1922 film Dr. Mabuse ( The Gambler ) exposed the insanity of German population ’ s collapse into speculative insanity as those who had the means began betting against the German mark in order to protect themselves thus only helping to collapse the mark from within .
This is very reminiscent of those Americans today short selling the US dollar rather than fighting for a systemic solution .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Germany ’ s Nazi-stained destiny was anything but pre-determined .
It is a provable fact often left out of history books that patriotic forces from Russia , America and Germany attempted courageously to change the tragic trajectory of hyperinflation and fascism which WOULD HAVE prevented the rise of Hitler and WWII had their efforts not been sabotaged .
Amazon Essentials Men & ... Buy New $ 24.00 From America itself , a new Presidential team under the leadership of William Harding quickly reversed the pro-League of Nations agenda of the rabidly anglophile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ industrialist named Washington Baker Vanderclip who had led in the world ’ s largest trade agreement in history with Russia to the tune of $ 3 billion in 1920 had called Wilson “ an autocrat at the inspiration of the British government.
” Unlike Wilson , President Harding both supported the US-Russia trade deal and undermined the League of Nations by re-enforcing America ’ s sovereignty , declaring bi-lateral treaties with Russia , Hungary and Austria outside of the league ’ s control in 1921 .
The newly-formed British Roundtable Movement in America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foreign Relations ) were not pleased .
Just as Harding was maneuvering to recognize the Soviet Union and establish an entente with Lenin , the great president ate some “ bad oysters ” and died on August 2 , 1923 .
While no autopsy was ever conducted , his death brought a decade of Anglophile Wall Street control into America and ended all opposition to World Government from the Presidency .
This period resulted in the speculation-driven bubble of the roaring 20s whose crash on black Friday in 1929 nearly unleashed a fascist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organizing , leading representatives of Russia and Germany agreed to an alternative solution to the Versailles Treaty which would have given new life to Germany ’ s patriots and established a powerful Russia-German friendship in Europe that would have upset other nefarious agendas .
Under the leadership of German Industrialist and Foreign Minster Walter Rathenau , and his counterpart Russian Foreign Minister Georgi Chicherin , the treaty was signed in Rapallo , Italy on April 16 , 1922 premised upon the forgiveness of all war debts and a renouncement of all territorial claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia and Germany would “ co-operate in a spirit of mutual goodwill in meeting the economic needs of both countries.
” When Rathenau was assassinated by a terrorist cell called the Organization Consul on June 24 , 1922 the success of the Rapallo Treaty lost its steam and the nation fell into a deeper wave of chaos and money printing .
The Organization Consul had taken the lead in the murder of over 354 German political figures between 1919-1923 , and when they were banned in 1922 , the group merely changed its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ groups ( such as the Freikorps ) becoming the military arm of the new National Socialist Party .
When the hyperinflationary blowout of Germany resulted in total un-governability of the state , a solution took the form of the Wall Street authored “ Dawes Plan ” which necessitated the use of a London-trained golem by the name of Hjalmar Schacht .
First introduced as Currency Commissioner in November 1923 and soon President of the Reichsbank , Schacht ’ s first act was to visit Bank of England ’ s governor Montagu Norman in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proceeding with Germany ’ s restructuring .
Schacht returned to “ solve ” the crisis with the very same poison that caused it .
First announcing a new currency called the “ rentenmark ” set on a fixed value exchanging 1 trillion reichsmarks for 1 new rentenmark , Germans were robbed yet again .
This new currency would operate under “ new rules ” never before seen in Germany ’ s history : Mass privatizations resulted in Anglo-American conglomerates purchasing state enterprises .
IG Farben , Thyssen , Union Banking , Brown Brothers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Union Banking took control Germany ’ s finances , mining and industrial interests under the supervision of John Foster Dulles , Montagu Norman , Averill Harriman and other deep state actors .
This was famously exposed in the 1961 film Judgement at Nuremburg by Stanley Kramer .
Schacht next cut credit to industries , raised taxes and imposed mass austerity on “ useless spending ” .
390 000 civil servants were fired , unions and collective bargaining was destroyed and wages were slashed by 15 % .
Legendary Whitetails B ... Buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this destruction of life after the hell of Versailles was intolerable and civil unrest began to boil over in ways that even the powerful London-Wall Street bankers ( and their mercenaries ) couldn ’ t control .
An enforcer was needed unhindered by the republic ’ s democratic institutions to force Schacht ’ s economics onto the people .
An up-and-coming rabble rousing failed painter who had made waves in a Beerhall Putsch on November 8 , 1923 was perfect .
One Last Attempt to Save Germany Though Hitler grew in power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , one last republican effort was made to prevent Germany from plunging into a fascist hell in the form of the November 1932 election victory of General Kurt von Schleicher as Chancellor of Germany .
Schleicher had been a co-architect of Rapallo alongside Rathenau a decade earlier and was a strong proponent of the Friedrich List Society ’ s program of public works and internal improvements promoted by industrialist Wilhelm Lautenbach .
The Nazi party ’ s public support collapsed and it found itself bankrupt .
Hitler had fallen into depression and was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coup ” was unleashed by the Anglo-American elite resulting in Wall Street funds pouring into Nazi coffers .
By January 30 , 1933 Hitler gained Chancellorship where he quickly took dictatorial powers under the “ state of emergency ” caused by the burning of the Reichstag in March 1933 .
By 1934 the Night of the Long Knives saw General Schleicher and hundreds of other German patriots assassinated and it was only a few years until the City of London-Wall Street Frankenstein monster stormed across the world .
How the 1929 Crash was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ market crash unleashed four years of hell in America which quickly spread across Europe under the great depression , not many people have realized that this was not inevitable , but rather a controlled blowout .
COOFANDY Men ’ s S ... Buy New $ 31.99 The bubbles of the 1920s were unleashed with the early death of President William Harding in 1923 and grew under the careful guidance of JP Morgan ’ s President Coolidge and financier Andrew Mellon ( Treasury Secretary ) who de-regulated the banks , imposed austerity onto the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Broker loans allowing speculators to borrow 90 % on their stock .
Wall Street was deregulated , investments into the real economy were halted during the 1920s and insanity became the norm .
In 1925 broker loans totalled $ 1.5 billion and grew to $ 2.6 billion in 1926 and hit $ 5.7 billion by the end of 1927 .
By 1928 , the stock market was overvalued fourfold !
When the bubble was sufficiently inflated , a moment was decided upon to coordinate a mass “ calling in ” of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could pay them resulting in a collapse of the markets .
Those “ in the know ” cleaned up with JP Morgan ’ s “ preferred clients ” , and other financial behemoths selling before the crash and then buying up the physical assets of America for pennies on the dollar .
One notable person who made his fortune in this manner was Prescott Bush of Brown Brothers Harriman , who went onto bailout a bankrupt Nazi party in 1932 .
These financiers had a tight allegiance with the City of London and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ banking system of America ’ s Federal Reserve and Bank of International Settlements .
The Living Hell that was the Great Depression Throughout the Great depression , the population was pushed to its limits making America highly susceptible to fascism as unemployment skyrocketed to 25 % , industrial capacity collapsed by 70 % , and agricultural prices collapsed far below the cost of production accelerating foreclosures and suicide .
Life savings were lost as 4000 banks failed .
This despair was replicated across Europe and Canada with eugenics-loving fascists gaining popularity across the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sir Oswald Mosley ’ s British Union of Fascists in 1932 , English Canada had its own fascist solution with the Rhodes Scholar “ Fabian Society ” League of Social Reconstruction ( which later took over the Liberal Party ) calling for the “ scientific management of society ” .
Time magazine had featured Il Duce over 6 times by 1932 and people were being told by that corporate fascism was the economic solution to all of America ’ s economic woes .
In the midst of the crisis , the City of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1931 which was a crippling blow to the USA , as it resulted in a flight of gold from America causing a deeper contraction of the money supply and thus inability to respond to the depression .
British goods simultaneously swamped the USA crushing what little production was left .
It was in this atmosphere that one of the least understood battles unfolded in 1933 .
In Germany , a surprise victory of Gen. Kurt Schleicher caused the defeat of the London-directed Nazi party in December 1932 threatening to break Germany free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks before Schleicher ’ s victory , Franklin Roosevelt won the presidency in America threatening to regulate the private banks and assert national sovereignty over finance .
Seeing their plans for global fascism slipping away , the City of London announced that a new global system controlled by Central Banks had to be created post haste .
Their objective was to use the economic crisis as an excuse to remove from nation states any power over monetary policy , while enhancing the power of Independent Central Banks as enforcers of “ balanced global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , an economic conference “ to stabilize the world economy ” was organized by the League of Nations under the guidance of the Bank of International Settlements ( BIS ) and Bank of England .
The BIS was set up as “ the Central Bank of Central Banks ” in 1930 in order to facilitate WWI debt repayments and was a vital instrument for funding Nazi Germany- long after WWII began .
The London Economic Conference brought together 64 nations of the world under a controlled environment chaired by the British Prime Minister @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The conference considers it to be essential , in order to provide an international gold standard with the necessary mechanism for satisfactory working , that independent Central Banks , with requisite powers and freedom to carry out an appropriate currency and credit policy , should be created in such developed countries as have not at present an adequate central banking institution ” and that “ the conference wish to reaffirm the great utility of close and continuous cooperation between Central Banks .
The Bank of International Settlements should play an increasingly important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but also as an instrument for common action.
” Echoing the Bank of England ’ s modern fixation with “ mathematical equilibrium ” , the resolutions stated that the new global gold standard controlled by central banks was needed “ to maintain a fundamental equilibrium in the balance of payments ” of countries .
The idea was to deprive nation states of their power to generate and direct credit for their own development .
Chancellor Schleicher ’ s resistance to a bankers ’ dictatorship was resolved by a “ soft coup ” ousting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hitler ( under the control of a Bank of England toy named Hjalmar Schacht ) in January 1933 with Schleicher assassinated the following year .
In America , an assassination attempt on Roosevelt was thwarted on February 15 , 1933 when a woman knocked the gun out of the hand of an anarchist-freemason in Miami resulting in the death of Chicago ’ s Mayor Cermak .
Without FDR ’ s dead body , the London conference met an insurmountable barrier , as FDR refused to permit any American cooperation .
Roosevelt recognized the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but he also knew that it had to be organized by sovereign nation states subservient to the general welfare of the people and not central banks dedicated to the welfare of the oligarchy .
Before any international changes could occur , nation states castrated from the effects of the depression had to first recover economically in order to stay above the power of the financiers .
By May 1933 , the London Conference crumbled when FDR complained that the conference ’ s inability to address the real issues of the crisis is “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and that fixation with short term stability were “ old fetishes of so-called international bankers ” .
FDR continued “ The United States seeks the kind of dollar which a generation hence will have the same purchasing and debt paying power as the dollar value we hope to attain in the near future .
That objective means more to the good of other nations than a fixed ratio for a month or two .
Exchange rate fixing is not the true answer.
” The British drafted an official statement saying “ the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ useless to continue the conference.
” The new president laid down the gauntlet in his inaugural speech on March 4th saying : “ The money-changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization .
We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths .
The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit ” .
FDR declared a war on Wall Street on several levels , beginning with his support of the Pecorra Commission which sent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposed the criminal activities of the top tier of Wall Street ’ s power structure who manipulated the depression , buying political offices and pushing fascism .
Ferdinand Pecorra who ran the commission called out the deep state when he said “ this small group of highly placed financiers , controlling the very springs of economic activity , holds more real power than any similar group in the United States.
” Pecorra ’ s highly publicized success empowered FDR to impose sweeping regulation in the form of 1 ) Glass-Steagall bank separation , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the creation of the Security Exchange Commission to oversee Wall Street .
Most importantly , FDR disempowered the London-controlled Federal Reserve by installing his own man as Chair ( Industrialist Mariner Eccles ) who forced it to obey national commands for the first time since 1913 , while creating an “ alternative ” lending mechanism outside of Fed control called the Reconstruction Finance Corporation ( RFC ) which became the number one lender to infrastructure in America throughout the 1930s .
Amazon Essentials Men & ... Buy New $ 22.00 One of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonized today was his abolishment of the gold standard .
The gold standard itself constricted the money supply to a strict exchange of gold per paper dollar , thus preventing the construction of internal improvements needed to revive industrial capacity and put the millions of unemployed back to work for which no financial resources existed .
It ’ s manipulation by international financiers made it a weapon of destruction rather than creation at this time .
Since commodity prices had fallen lower than the costs of production , it was vital to increase @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ controlled inflation ” so that factories and farms could become solvent and unfortunately the gold standard held that back .
FDR imposed protective tariffs to favor agro-industrial recovery on all fronts ending years of rapacious free trade .
FDR stated his political-economic philosophy in 1934 : “ the old fallacious notion of the bankers on the one side and the government on the other side , as being more or less equal and independent units , has passed away .
Government by the necessity of things must be the leader , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflicting interests of all groups in the community , including bankers.
” Once liberated from the shackles of the central banks , FDR and his allies were able to start a genuine recovery by restoring confidence in banking .
Within 31 days of his bank holiday , 75 % of banks were operational and the FDIC was created to insure deposits .
Four million people were given immediate work , and hundreds of libraries , schools and hospitals were built and staffed- All funded through the RFC .
FDR ’ s first fireside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government and banks , serving even today as a strong lesson in banking which central bankers don ’ t want you to learn about .
From 1933-1939 , 45 000 infrastructure projects were built .
The many “ local ” projects were governed , like China ’ s Belt and Road Initiative today , under a “ grand design ” which FDR termed the “ Four Quarters ” featuring zones of megaprojects such as the Tennessee Valley Authority area in the south east , the Columbia River Treaty zone on the northwest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the North east , and Hoover Dam/Colorado zone on the Southwest .
These projects were transformative in ways money could never measure as the Tennessee area ’ s literacy rose from 20 % in 1932 to 80 % in 1950 , and racist backwater holes of the south became the bedrock for America ’ s aerospace industry due to the abundant and cheap hydropower .
As I had already reported on the Saker , FDR was not a Keynesian ( although it can not be argued that hives of Rhodes Scholars and Fabians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Those who criticize the New Deal today ignore the fact that its failures have more to do with Wall Street sabotage than anything intrinsic to the program .
For example , JP Morgan tool Lewis Douglass ( U.S. Budget Director ) forced the closure of the Civil Works Administration in 1934 resulting in the firing of all 4 million workers .
Wall Street did everything it could to choke the economy at every turn .
In 1931 , NY banks loans to the real economy amounted to $ 38.1 billion which dropped to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Where NY banks had 29 % of their funds in US bonds and securities in 1929 , this had risen to 58 % which cut off the government from being able to issue productive credit to the real economy .
When , in 1937 , FDR ’ s Treasury Secretary persuaded him to cancel public works to see if the economy “ could stand on its own two feet ” , Wall Street pulled credit out of the economy collapsing the Industrial production index from 110 to 85 erasing seven years ’ worth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 80 % capacity back to depression levels of 19 % .
Two million jobs were lost and the Dow Jones lost 39 % of its value .
This was no different from kicking the crutches out from a patient in rehabilitation and it was not lost on anyone that those doing the kicking were openly supporting Fascism in Europe .
Bush patriarch Prescott Bush , then representing Brown Brothers Harriman was found guilty for trading with the enemy in 1942 !
The bankers didn ’ t limit themselves to financial sabotage during this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military coup which was exposed by Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler in his congressional testimony of November 20 , 1934 .
Butler had testified that the plan was begun in the Summer of 1933 and organized by Wall Street financiers who tried to use him as a puppet dictator leading 500 000 American Legion members to storm the White House .
As Butler spoke , those same financiers had just set up an anti-New Deal organization called the American Liberty League which fought to keep America out of the war in defense of an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to partner with .
The American Liberty league only changed tune when it became evident that Hitler had become a disobedient Frankenstein monster who wasn ’ t content in a subservient position to Britain ’ s idea of a New World Order .
In response to the Liberty League ’ s agenda , FDR said “ some speak of a New World Order , but it is not new and it is not order ” .
Wantdo Men ’ s Mil ... Buy New $ 54.99 One of the greatest living testimonies to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a little known 1946 book authored by his son Elliot Roosevelt who , as his father ’ s confidante and aide , was privy to some of the most sensitive meetings his father participated in throughout the war .
Seeing the collapse of the post-war vision upon FDR ’ s April 12 , 1945 death and the emergence of a pro-Churchill presidency under Harry Truman , who lost no time in dropping nuclear bombs on a defeated Japan , ushering in a Soviet witch hunt at home and launching a Cold War @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Saw It ’ ( 1946 ) in order to create a living testimony to the potential that was lost upon his father ’ s passing .
As Elliot said of his motive to write his book : “ The decision to write this book was taken more recently and impelled by urgent events .
Winston Churchill ’ s speech at Fulton , Missouri , had a hand in this decision , … the growing stockpile of American atom bombs is a compelling factor ; all the signs of growing disunity among the leading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ broken promises , all the renascent power politics of greedy and desperate imperialism were my spurs in this undertaking… And I have seen the promises violated , and the conditions summarily and cynically disregarded , and the structure of peace disavowed… I am writing this , then , to you who agree with me that… the path he charted has been most grievously—and deliberately—forsaken.
” Even before America had entered the war , the principles of international harmony which FDR enunciated in his January 6 , 1941 Four Freedoms speech to the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every battle for the next 4.5 years .
In this speech FDR said : “ In future days , which we seek to secure , we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms .
“ The first is the freedom of speech and expression–everywhere in the world .
“ The second is the freedom of every person to worship God in his own way–everywhere in the world .
“ The third is the freedom from want–which , translated into world terms , means economic understandings which will secure to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its inhabitants–everywhere in the world .
“ The fourth is freedom from fear–which , translated into world terms , means a worldwide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor–anywhere in the world .
“ That is no vision of a distant millennium .
It is a definite basis for a kind of world attainable in our time and generation .
That kind of world is the very antithesis of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dictators seek to create with the crash of a bomb .
“ To that new order , we oppose the greater conception–the moral order .
A good society is able to face schemes of world domination and foreign revolutions alike without fear .
“ Since the beginning of American history , we have been engaged in change–in a perpetual peaceful revolution–a revolution which goes on steadily , quietly , adjusting itself to changing conditions–without the concentration camp or the quicklime in the ditch .
The world order which we seek is the cooperation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a friendly , civilized society .
“ This nation has placed its destiny in the hands and heads and hearts of millions of free men and women ; and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God .
Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere .
Our support goes to those who struggle to gain those rights or to keep them .
Our strength is our unity of purpose.
” Upon hearing these Freedoms outlined , American painter Norman Rockwell was inspired to paint four masterpieces that were displayed across America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s spirit to all citizens .
FDR ’ s patriotic Vice President ( and the man who SHOULD have been president in 1948 ) Henry Wallace outlined FDR ’ s vision in a passionate video address to the people in 1942 which should also be watched by all world citizens today : Churchill vs FDR : The Clash of Two Paradigms Elliot ’ s account of the 1941-1945 clash of paradigms between his father and Churchill are invaluable both for their ability to shed light into the true noble constitutional character of America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also in demonstrating the beautiful potential of a world that SHOULD HAVE BEEN had certain unnatural events not intervened to derail the evolution of our species into an age of win-win cooperation , creative reason and harmony .
In As He Saw It , Elliot documents a conversation he had with his father at the beginning of America ’ s entry into WWII , who made his anti-colonial intentions clear as day saying : “ I ’ m talking about another war , Elliott .
I ’ m talking about what will happen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ war we allow millions of people to slide back into the same semi-slavery !
“ Don ’ t think for a moment , Elliott , that Americans would be dying in the Pacific tonight , if it hadn ’ t been for the shortsighted greed of the French and the British and the Dutch .
Shall we allow them to do it all , all over again ?
Your son will be about the right age , fifteen or twenty years from now .
“ One sentence , Elliott .
Then I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here .
I ’ m tired .
This is the sentence : When we ’ ve won the war , I will work with all my might and main to see to it that the United States is not wheedled into the position of accepting any plan that will further France ’ s imperialistic ambitions , or that will aid or abet the British Empire in its imperial ambitions.
” This clash came to a head during a major confrontation between FDR and Churchill during the January 24 , 1943 Casablanca Conference in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documents how his father first confronted Churchill ’ s belief in the maintenance of the British Empire ’ s preferential trade agreements upon which it ’ s looting system was founded : “ Of course , ” he [ FDR ] remarked , with a sly sort of assurance , “ of course , after the war , one of the preconditions of any lasting peace will have to be the greatest possible freedom of trade.
” He paused .
The P.M. ’ s head was lowered ; he was watching Father steadily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No artificial barriers , ” Father pursued .
“ As few favored economic agreements as possible .
Opportunities for expansion .
Markets open for healthy competition.
” His eye wandered innocently around the room .
Churchill shifted in his armchair .
“ The British Empire trade agreements ” he began heavily , “ are— ” Father broke in .
“ Yes .
Those Empire trade agreements are a case in point .
It ’ s because of them that the people of India and Africa , of all the colonial Near East and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as they are.
” Churchill ’ s neck reddened and he crouched forward .
“ Mr .
President , England does not propose for a moment to lose its favored position among the British Dominions .
The trade that has made England great shall continue , and under conditions prescribed by England ’ s ministers.
” “ You see , ” said Father slowly , “ it is along in here somewhere that there is likely to be some disagreement between you , Winston , and me .
“ I am firmly of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrive at a stable peace it must involve the development of backward countries .
Backward peoples .
How can this be done ?
It can ’ t be done , obviously , by eighteenth-century methods .
Now— ” “ Whichever of your ministers recommends a policy which takes wealth in raw materials out of a colonial country , but which returns nothing to the people of that country in consideration .
Twentieth-century methods involve bringing industry to these colonies .
Twentieth-century methods include increasing the wealth of a people by increasing their standard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by bringing them sanitation—by making sure that they get a return for the raw wealth of their community.
” Around the room , all of us were leaning forward attentively .
Hopkins was grinning .
Commander Thompson , Churchill ’ s aide , was looking glum and alarmed .
The P.M. himself was beginning to look apoplectic .
“ Yes .
I can ’ t believe that we can fight a war against fascist slavery , and at the same time not work to free people all over the world from a backward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ glad you mentioned them .
They get their independence , you know , in 1946 .
And they ’ ve gotten modern sanitation , modern education ; their rate of illiteracy has gone steadily down… ” “ There can be no tampering with the Empire ’ s economic agreements.
” “ They ’ re the foundation of our greatness.
” “ The peace , ” said Father firmly , “ can not include any continued despotism .
The structure of the peace demands and will get equality of peoples .
Equality of peoples @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Will anyone suggest that Germany ’ s attempt to dominate trade in central Europe was not a major contributing factor to war ?
” It was an argument that could have no resolution between these two men… The following day , Elliot describes how the conversation continued between the two men with Churchill stating : “ Mr .
President , ” he cried , “ I believe you are trying to do away with the British Empire .
Every idea you entertain about the structure of the postwar world demonstrates it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ his forefinger waved— ” in spite of that , we know that you constitute our only hope .
And ” —his voice sank dramatically— ” you know that we know it .
You know that we know that without America , the Empire won ’ t stand.
” Churchill admitted , in that moment , that he knew the peace could only be won according to precepts which the United States of America would lay down .
And in saying what he did , he was acknowledging that British colonial policy would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to dominate world trade would be a dead duck , and British ambitions to play off the U.S.S.R. against the U.S.A. would be a dead duck .
Or would have been , if Father had lived.
” This story was delivered in full during an August 15 lecture by the author : While FDR ’ s struggle did change the course of history , his early death during the first months of his fourth term resulted in a fascist perversion of his post-war vision .
Rather than see the IMF , World Bank @ @ @ @ @ @ @ internationalization of the New Deal principles to promote long term , low interest loans for the industrial development of former colonies , FDR ’ s allies were ousted from power over his dead body , and they were recaptured by the same forces who attempted to steer the world towards a Central Banking Dictatorship in 1933 .
The American Liberty League spawned into various “ patriotic ” anti-communist organizations which took power with the FBI and McCarthyism under the fog of the Cold War .
This is the structure that Eisenhower warned about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Industrial Complex ” in 1960 and which John Kennedy did battle with during his 900 days as president .
This is the structure which is out to destroy President Donald Trump and undo the November elections under a military coup and Civil War out of fear that a new FDR impulse is beginning to be revived in America which may align with the 21st Century international New Deal emerging from China ’ s Belt and Road Initiative and Eurasian alliance .
French Finance Minister Bruno LeMaire and Marc Carney have stated their fear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t imposed by the west , then the New Silk Road and yuan will become the basis for the new world system .
The Bank of England-authored Green New Deal being pushed under the fog of COVID-19 ’ s Great Green Global Reset which promise to impose draconian constraints on humanity ’ s carrying capacity in defense of saving nature from humanity have nothing to do with Franklin Roosevelt ’ s New Deal and they have less to do with the Bretton Woods conference of 1944 .
These are merely central bankers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ with a democratic face ” which their 1923 and 1933 efforts failed to achieve and can only be imposed if people remain blind to their own recent history .
This originally appeared on The Saker .

While the world’s attention is absorbed by tectonic shifts unfolding across America as “a perfect storm of civil war, and military coup threatens to undo both the elections and the very foundations of the republic itself, something very ominous has appeared “off of the radar” of most onlookers. This something is a financial collapse of the trans-Atlantic banks that threatens to unleash chaos upon the world. It is this collapse that underlies the desperate efforts being made by the neo-con drive for total war with Russia, China and other members of the growing Mutlipolar Alliance today.
In recent articles, I have mentioned that the Bank of England-led “solution” to this oncoming financial blowout of the $1.5 quadrillion derivatives bubble is being pushed under the cover of a “Great Global Reset” which is an ugly and desperate effort to use COVID-19 as a cover for the imposition of a new post-covid world order operating system. Since the new “rules” of this new system are very similar to the 1923 Bank of England “solution” to Germany’s economic chaos which eventually required a fascist governance mechanism to impose it onto the masses, I wish to take a deeper look at the causes and effects of Weimar Germany’s completely un-necessary collapse into hyperinflation and chaos during the period of 1919-1923.
Legendary Whitetails M... Buy New $79.99 (as of 05:12 UTC - Details) In this essay, I will go further to examine how those same architects of hyperfinflation came close to establishing a global bankers’ dictatorship in 1933 and how that early attempt at a New World Order was fortunately derailed through a bold fight which has been written out of popular history books.
We will investigate in depth how a major war broke out within America led by anti-imperial patriots in opposition to the forces of Wall Street and London’s Deep State and we will examine how this clash of paradigms came to a head in 1943-1945.
This historical study is not being conducted for entertainment, nor should this be seen as a purely academic exercise, but is being created for the simple fact that the world is coming to a total systemic meltdown and unless certain suppressed facts of 20th century history are brought to light, then those forces who have destroyed our collective memory of what we once were will remain in the drivers seat as society is carried into a new age of fascism and world war.
Versailles and the Destruction of Germany
Britain had been the leading hand behind the orchestration of WWI and the destruction of the potential German-Russian-American-Ottoman alliance that had begun to take form by the late 19th century as foolish Kaiser Wilhelm discovered (though sadly too late) when he said: “the world will be engulfed in the most terrible of wars, the ultimate aim of which is the ruin of Germany. England, France and Russia have conspired for our annihilation… that is the naked truth of the situation which was slowly but surely created by Edward VII”.
Just as the British oligarchy managed the war, so too did they organize the reparations conference in France which, among other things, imposed impossible debt repayments upon a defeated Germany and created the League of Nations which was meant to become the instrument for a “post-nation state world order”. Lloyd George led the British delegation alongside his assistant Philip Kerr (Lord Lothian), Leo Amery, Lord Robert Cecil and Lord John Maynard Keynes who have a long term agenda to bring about a global dictatorship. All of these figures were members of the newly emerging Round Table Movement, that had taken full control of Britain by ousting Asquith in 1916, and which is at the heart of today’s “deep state”.
After the 1918 Armistice dismantled Germany’s army and navy, the once powerful nation was now forced to pay the impossible sum of 132 billion gold marks to the victors and had to give up territories representing 10% of its population (Alsace-Loraine, Ruhr, and North Silesia) which made up 15% of its arable land, 12% of its livestock, 74% of its iron ore, 63% of its zinc production, and 26% of its coal. Germany also had to give up 8000 locomotives, 225 000 railcars and all of its colonies. It was a field day of modern pillage.
Germany was left with very few options. Taxes were increased and imports were cut entirely while exports were increased. This policy (reminiscent of the IMF austerity techniques in use today) failed entirely as both fell 60%. Germany gave up half of its gold supply and still barely a dent was made in the debt payments. By June 1920 the decision was made to begin a new strategy: increase the printing press. Rather than the “miracle cure” which desperate monetarists foolishly believed it would be, this solution resulted in an asymptotic devaluation of the currency into hyperinflation. From June 1920 to October 1923 the money supply in circulation skyrocketed from 68.1 gold marks to 496.6 quintillion gold marks. In June 1922, 300 marks exchanged $1 US and in November 1923, it took 42 trillion marks to get $1 US! Images are still available of Germans pushing wheelbarrows of cash down the street, just to buy a stick of butter and bread (1Kg of Bread sold for $428 billion marks in 1923).
.
With the currency’s loss of value, industrial output fell by 50%, unemployment rose to over 30% and food intake collapsed by over half of pre-war levels. German director Fritz Lang’s 1922 film Dr. Mabuse (The Gambler) exposed the insanity of German population’s collapse into speculative insanity as those who had the means began betting against the German mark in order to protect themselves thus only helping to collapse the mark from within. This is very reminiscent of those Americans today short selling the US dollar rather than fighting for a systemic solution.
There was resistance.
The dark effects of Versailles were not unknown and Germany’s Nazi-stained destiny was anything but pre-determined. It is a provable fact often left out of history books that patriotic forces from Russia, America and Germany attempted courageously to change the tragic trajectory of hyperinflation and fascism which WOULD HAVE prevented the rise of Hitler and WWII had their efforts not been sabotaged. Amazon Essentials Men&... Buy New $24.00 (as of 05:12 UTC - Details)
From America itself, a new Presidential team under the leadership of William Harding quickly reversed the pro-League of Nations agenda of the rabidly anglophile President Woodrow Wilson. A leading US industrialist named Washington Baker Vanderclip who had led in the world’s largest trade agreement in history with Russia to the tune of $3 billion in 1920 had called Wilson “an autocrat at the inspiration of the British government.” Unlike Wilson, President Harding both supported the US-Russia trade deal and undermined the League of Nations by re-enforcing America’s sovereignty, declaring bi-lateral treaties with Russia, Hungary and Austria outside of the league’s control in 1921. The newly-formed British Roundtable Movement in America (set up as the Council on Foreign Relations) were not pleased.
Just as Harding was maneuvering to recognize the Soviet Union and establish an entente with Lenin, the great president ate some “bad oysters” and died on August 2, 1923. While no autopsy was ever conducted, his death brought a decade of Anglophile Wall Street control into America and ended all opposition to World Government from the Presidency. This period resulted in the speculation-driven bubble of the roaring 20s whose crash on black Friday in 1929 nearly unleashed a fascist hell in America.
The Russia-Germany Rapallo Treaty is De-Railed
After months of organizing, leading representatives of Russia and Germany agreed to an alternative solution to the Versailles Treaty which would have given new life to Germany’s patriots and established a powerful Russia-German friendship in Europe that would have upset other nefarious agendas.
Under the leadership of German Industrialist and Foreign Minster Walter Rathenau, and his counterpart Russian Foreign Minister Georgi Chicherin, the treaty was signed in Rapallo, Italy on April 16, 1922 premised upon the forgiveness of all war debts and a renouncement of all territorial claims from either side. The treaty said Russia and Germany would “co-operate in a spirit of mutual goodwill in meeting the economic needs of both countries.”
When Rathenau was assassinated by a terrorist cell called the Organization Consul on June 24, 1922 the success of the Rapallo Treaty lost its steam and the nation fell into a deeper wave of chaos and money printing. The Organization Consul had taken the lead in the murder of over 354 German political figures between 1919-1923, and when they were banned in 1922, the group merely changed its name and morphed into other German paramilitary groups (such as the Freikorps) becoming the military arm of the new National Socialist Party.
1923: City of London’s Solution is imposed
When the hyperinflationary blowout of Germany resulted in total un-governability of the state, a solution took the form of the Wall Street authored “Dawes Plan” which necessitated the use of a London-trained golem by the name of Hjalmar Schacht. First introduced as Currency Commissioner in November 1923 and soon President of the Reichsbank, Schacht’s first act was to visit Bank of England’s governor Montagu Norman in London who provided Schacht a blueprint for proceeding with Germany’s restructuring. Schacht returned to “solve” the crisis with the very same poison that caused it.
First announcing a new currency called the “rentenmark” set on a fixed value exchanging 1 trillion reichsmarks for 1 new rentenmark, Germans were robbed yet again. This new currency would operate under “new rules” never before seen in Germany’s history: Mass privatizations resulted in Anglo-American conglomerates purchasing state enterprises. IG Farben, Thyssen, Union Banking, Brown Brothers Harriman, Standard Oil, JP Morgan and Union Banking took control Germany’s finances, mining and industrial interests under the supervision of John Foster Dulles, Montagu Norman, Averill Harriman and other deep state actors. This was famously exposed in the 1961 film Judgement at Nuremburg by Stanley Kramer.
Schacht next cut credit to industries, raised taxes and imposed mass austerity on “useless spending”. 390 000 civil servants were fired, unions and collective bargaining was destroyed and wages were slashed by 15%.
Legendary Whitetails B... Buy New $29.99 (as of 05:12 UTC - Details) As one can imagine, this destruction of life after the hell of Versailles was intolerable and civil unrest began to boil over in ways that even the powerful London-Wall Street bankers (and their mercenaries) couldn’t control. An enforcer was needed unhindered by the republic’s democratic institutions to force Schacht’s economics onto the people. An up-and-coming rabble rousing failed painter who had made waves in a Beerhall Putsch on November 8, 1923 was perfect.
One Last Attempt to Save Germany
Though Hitler grew in power over the coming decade of Schachtian economics, one last republican effort was made to prevent Germany from plunging into a fascist hell in the form of the November 1932 election victory of General Kurt von Schleicher as Chancellor of Germany. Schleicher had been a co-architect of Rapallo alongside Rathenau a decade earlier and was a strong proponent of the Friedrich List Society’s program of public works and internal improvements promoted by industrialist Wilhelm Lautenbach. The Nazi party’s public support collapsed and it found itself bankrupt. Hitler had fallen into depression and was even contemplating suicide when “a legal coup” was unleashed by the Anglo-American elite resulting in Wall Street funds pouring into Nazi coffers.
By January 30, 1933 Hitler gained Chancellorship where he quickly took dictatorial powers under the “state of emergency” caused by the burning of the Reichstag in March 1933. By 1934 the Night of the Long Knives saw General Schleicher and hundreds of other German patriots assassinated and it was only a few years until the City of London-Wall Street Frankenstein monster stormed across the world.
How the 1929 Crash was Manufactured
While everyone knows that the 1929 market crash unleashed four years of hell in America which quickly spread across Europe under the great depression, not many people have realized that this was not inevitable, but rather a controlled blowout. COOFANDY Men’s S... Buy New $31.99 (as of 05:12 UTC - Details)
The bubbles of the 1920s were unleashed with the early death of President William Harding in 1923 and grew under the careful guidance of JP Morgan’s President Coolidge and financier Andrew Mellon (Treasury Secretary) who de-regulated the banks, imposed austerity onto the country, and cooked up a scheme for Broker loans allowing speculators to borrow 90% on their stock. Wall Street was deregulated, investments into the real economy were halted during the 1920s and insanity became the norm. In 1925 broker loans totalled $1.5 billion and grew to $2.6 billion in 1926 and hit $5.7 billion by the end of 1927. By 1928, the stock market was overvalued fourfold!
When the bubble was sufficiently inflated, a moment was decided upon to coordinate a mass “calling in” of the broker loans. Predictably, no one could pay them resulting in a collapse of the markets. Those “in the know” cleaned up with JP Morgan’s “preferred clients”, and other financial behemoths selling before the crash and then buying up the physical assets of America for pennies on the dollar. One notable person who made his fortune in this manner was Prescott Bush of Brown Brothers Harriman, who went onto bailout a bankrupt Nazi party in 1932. These financiers had a tight allegiance with the City of London and coordinated their operations through the private central banking system of America’s Federal Reserve and Bank of International Settlements.
The Living Hell that was the Great Depression
Throughout the Great depression, the population was pushed to its limits making America highly susceptible to fascism as unemployment skyrocketed to 25%, industrial capacity collapsed by 70%, and agricultural prices collapsed far below the cost of production accelerating foreclosures and suicide. Life savings were lost as 4000 banks failed.
This despair was replicated across Europe and Canada with eugenics-loving fascists gaining popularity across the board. England saw the rise of Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists in 1932, English Canada had its own fascist solution with the Rhodes Scholar “Fabian Society” League of Social Reconstruction (which later took over the Liberal Party) calling for the “scientific management of society”. Time magazine had featured Il Duce over 6 times by 1932 and people were being told by that corporate fascism was the economic solution to all of America’s economic woes.
In the midst of the crisis, the City of London removed itself from the gold standard in 1931 which was a crippling blow to the USA, as it resulted in a flight of gold from America causing a deeper contraction of the money supply and thus inability to respond to the depression. British goods simultaneously swamped the USA crushing what little production was left.
It was in this atmosphere that one of the least understood battles unfolded in 1933.
1932: A Bankers’ Dictatorship is Attempted
In Germany, a surprise victory of Gen. Kurt Schleicher caused the defeat of the London-directed Nazi party in December 1932 threatening to break Germany free of Central Bank tyranny. A few weeks before Schleicher’s victory, Franklin Roosevelt won the presidency in America threatening to regulate the private banks and assert national sovereignty over finance.
Seeing their plans for global fascism slipping away, the City of London announced that a new global system controlled by Central Banks had to be created post haste. Their objective was to use the economic crisis as an excuse to remove from nation states any power over monetary policy, while enhancing the power of Independent Central Banks as enforcers of “balanced global budgets”. elaborate
In December 1932, an economic conference “to stabilize the world economy” was organized by the League of Nations under the guidance of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) and Bank of England. The BIS was set up as “the Central Bank of Central Banks” in 1930 in order to facilitate WWI debt repayments and was a vital instrument for funding Nazi Germany- long after WWII began. The London Economic Conference brought together 64 nations of the world under a controlled environment chaired by the British Prime Minister and opened by the King himself.
A resolution passed by the Conference’s Monetary Committee stated:
“The conference considers it to be essential, in order to provide an international gold standard with the necessary mechanism for satisfactory working, that independent Central Banks, with requisite powers and freedom to carry out an appropriate currency and credit policy, should be created in such developed countries as have not at present an adequate central banking institution” and that “the conference wish to reaffirm the great utility of close and continuous cooperation between Central Banks. The Bank of International Settlements should play an increasingly important part not only by improving contact, but also as an instrument for common action.”
Echoing the Bank of England’s modern fixation with “mathematical equilibrium”, the resolutions stated that the new global gold standard controlled by central banks was needed “to maintain a fundamental equilibrium in the balance of payments” of countries. The idea was to deprive nation states of their power to generate and direct credit for their own development.
FDR Torpedoes the London Conference
Chancellor Schleicher’s resistance to a bankers’ dictatorship was resolved by a “soft coup” ousting the patriotic leader in favor of Adolph Hitler (under the control of a Bank of England toy named Hjalmar Schacht) in January 1933 with Schleicher assassinated the following year. In America, an assassination attempt on Roosevelt was thwarted on February 15, 1933 when a woman knocked the gun out of the hand of an anarchist-freemason in Miami resulting in the death of Chicago’s Mayor Cermak.
Without FDR’s dead body, the London conference met an insurmountable barrier, as FDR refused to permit any American cooperation. Roosevelt recognized the necessity for a new international system, but he also knew that it had to be organized by sovereign nation states subservient to the general welfare of the people and not central banks dedicated to the welfare of the oligarchy. Before any international changes could occur, nation states castrated from the effects of the depression had to first recover economically in order to stay above the power of the financiers.
By May 1933, the London Conference crumbled when FDR complained that the conference’s inability to address the real issues of the crisis is “a catastrophe amounting to a world tragedy” and that fixation with short term stability were “old fetishes of so-called international bankers”. FDR continued “The United States seeks the kind of dollar which a generation hence will have the same purchasing and debt paying power as the dollar value we hope to attain in the near future. That objective means more to the good of other nations than a fixed ratio for a month or two. Exchange rate fixing is not the true answer.”
The British drafted an official statement saying “the American statement on stabilization rendered it entirely useless to continue the conference.”
FDR’s War on Wall Street
The new president laid down the gauntlet in his inaugural speech on March 4th saying: “The money-changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit”.
FDR declared a war on Wall Street on several levels, beginning with his support of the Pecorra Commission which sent thousands of bankers to prison, and exposed the criminal activities of the top tier of Wall Street’s power structure who manipulated the depression, buying political offices and pushing fascism. Ferdinand Pecorra who ran the commission called out the deep state when he said “this small group of highly placed financiers, controlling the very springs of economic activity, holds more real power than any similar group in the United States.”
Pecorra’s highly publicized success empowered FDR to impose sweeping regulation in the form of 1) Glass-Steagall bank separation, 2) bankruptcy re-organization and 3) the creation of the Security Exchange Commission to oversee Wall Street. Most importantly, FDR disempowered the London-controlled Federal Reserve by installing his own man as Chair (Industrialist Mariner Eccles) who forced it to obey national commands for the first time since 1913, while creating an “alternative” lending mechanism outside of Fed control called the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) which became the number one lender to infrastructure in America throughout the 1930s. Amazon Essentials Men&... Buy New $22.00 (as of 05:12 UTC - Details)
One of the most controversial policies for which FDR is demonized today was his abolishment of the gold standard. The gold standard itself constricted the money supply to a strict exchange of gold per paper dollar, thus preventing the construction of internal improvements needed to revive industrial capacity and put the millions of unemployed back to work for which no financial resources existed. It’s manipulation by international financiers made it a weapon of destruction rather than creation at this time. Since commodity prices had fallen lower than the costs of production, it was vital to increase the price of goods under a form of “controlled inflation” so that factories and farms could become solvent and unfortunately the gold standard held that back. FDR imposed protective tariffs to favor agro-industrial recovery on all fronts ending years of rapacious free trade.
FDR stated his political-economic philosophy in 1934: “the old fallacious notion of the bankers on the one side and the government on the other side, as being more or less equal and independent units, has passed away. Government by the necessity of things must be the leader, must be the judge, of the conflicting interests of all groups in the community, including bankers.”
The Real New Deal
Once liberated from the shackles of the central banks, FDR and his allies were able to start a genuine recovery by restoring confidence in banking. Within 31 days of his bank holiday, 75% of banks were operational and the FDIC was created to insure deposits. Four million people were given immediate work, and hundreds of libraries, schools and hospitals were built and staffed- All funded through the RFC. FDR’s first fireside chat was vital in rebuilding confidence in the government and banks, serving even today as a strong lesson in banking which central bankers don’t want you to learn about.
From 1933-1939, 45 000 infrastructure projects were built. The many “local” projects were governed, like China’s Belt and Road Initiative today, under a “grand design” which FDR termed the “Four Quarters” featuring zones of megaprojects such as the Tennessee Valley Authority area in the south east, the Columbia River Treaty zone on the northwest, the St Laurence Seaway zone on the North east, and Hoover Dam/Colorado zone on the Southwest. These projects were transformative in ways money could never measure as the Tennessee area’s literacy rose from 20% in 1932 to 80% in 1950, and racist backwater holes of the south became the bedrock for America’s aerospace industry due to the abundant and cheap hydropower. As I had already reported on the Saker, FDR was not a Keynesian (although it cannot be argued that hives of Rhodes Scholars and Fabians penetrating his administration certainly were).
Wall Street Sabotages the New Deal
Those who criticize the New Deal today ignore the fact that its failures have more to do with Wall Street sabotage than anything intrinsic to the program. For example, JP Morgan tool Lewis Douglass (U.S. Budget Director) forced the closure of the Civil Works Administration in 1934 resulting in the firing of all 4 million workers.
Wall Street did everything it could to choke the economy at every turn. In 1931, NY banks loans to the real economy amounted to $38.1 billion which dropped to only $20.3 billion by 1935. Where NY banks had 29% of their funds in US bonds and securities in 1929, this had risen to 58% which cut off the government from being able to issue productive credit to the real economy.
When, in 1937, FDR’s Treasury Secretary persuaded him to cancel public works to see if the economy “could stand on its own two feet”, Wall Street pulled credit out of the economy collapsing the Industrial production index from 110 to 85 erasing seven years’ worth of gain, while steel fell from 80% capacity back to depression levels of 19%. Two million jobs were lost and the Dow Jones lost 39% of its value. This was no different from kicking the crutches out from a patient in rehabilitation and it was not lost on anyone that those doing the kicking were openly supporting Fascism in Europe. Bush patriarch Prescott Bush, then representing Brown Brothers Harriman was found guilty for trading with the enemy in 1942!
Coup Attempt in America Thwarted
The bankers didn’t limit themselves to financial sabotage during this time, but also attempted a fascist military coup which was exposed by Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler in his congressional testimony of November 20, 1934. Butler had testified that the plan was begun in the Summer of 1933 and organized by Wall Street financiers who tried to use him as a puppet dictator leading 500 000 American Legion members to storm the White House. As Butler spoke, those same financiers had just set up an anti-New Deal organization called the American Liberty League which fought to keep America out of the war in defense of an Anglo-Nazi fascist global government which they wished to partner with.
The American Liberty league only changed tune when it became evident that Hitler had become a disobedient Frankenstein monster who wasn’t content in a subservient position to Britain’s idea of a New World Order. In response to the Liberty League’s agenda, FDR said “some speak of a New World Order, but it is not new and it is not order”. Wantdo Men’s Mil... Buy New $54.99 (as of 05:12 UTC - Details)
FDR’s Anti-Colonial Post-War Vision
One of the greatest living testimonies to FDR’s anti-colonial vision is contained in a little known 1946 book authored by his son Elliot Roosevelt who, as his father’s confidante and aide, was privy to some of the most sensitive meetings his father participated in throughout the war. Seeing the collapse of the post-war vision upon FDR’s April 12, 1945 death and the emergence of a pro-Churchill presidency under Harry Truman, who lost no time in dropping nuclear bombs on a defeated Japan, ushering in a Soviet witch hunt at home and launching a Cold War abroad, Elliot authored ‘As He Saw It’ (1946) in order to create a living testimony to the potential that was lost upon his father’s passing.
As Elliot said of his motive to write his book:
“The decision to write this book was taken more recently and impelled by urgent events. Winston Churchill’s speech at Fulton, Missouri, had a hand in this decision,… the growing stockpile of American atom bombs is a compelling factor; all the signs of growing disunity among the leading nations of the world, all the broken promises, all the renascent power politics of greedy and desperate imperialism were my spurs in this undertaking… And I have seen the promises violated, and the conditions summarily and cynically disregarded, and the structure of peace disavowed… I am writing this, then, to you who agree with me that… the path he charted has been most grievously—and deliberately—forsaken.”
The Four Freedoms
Even before America had entered the war, the principles of international harmony which FDR enunciated in his January 6, 1941 Four Freedoms speech to the U.S. Congress served as the guiding light through every battle for the next 4.5 years. In this speech FDR said:
“In future days, which we seek to secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms.
“The first is the freedom of speech and expression–everywhere in the world.
“The second is the freedom of every person to worship God in his own way–everywhere in the world.
“The third is the freedom from want–which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants–everywhere in the world.
“The fourth is freedom from fear–which, translated into world terms, means a worldwide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor–anywhere in the world.
“That is no vision of a distant millennium. It is a definite basis for a kind of world attainable in our time and generation. That kind of world is the very antithesis of the so-called new order of tyranny which dictators seek to create with the crash of a bomb.
“To that new order, we oppose the greater conception–the moral order. A good society is able to face schemes of world domination and foreign revolutions alike without fear.
“Since the beginning of American history, we have been engaged in change–in a perpetual peaceful revolution–a revolution which goes on steadily, quietly, adjusting itself to changing conditions–without the concentration camp or the quicklime in the ditch. The world order which we seek is the cooperation of free countries, working together in a friendly, civilized society.
“This nation has placed its destiny in the hands and heads and hearts of millions of free men and women; and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God. Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere. Our support goes to those who struggle to gain those rights or to keep them. Our strength is our unity of purpose.”
Upon hearing these Freedoms outlined, American painter Norman Rockwell was inspired to paint four masterpieces that were displayed across America and conveyed the beauty of FDR’s spirit to all citizens.
FDR’s patriotic Vice President (and the man who SHOULD have been president in 1948) Henry Wallace outlined FDR’s vision in a passionate video address to the people in 1942 which should also be watched by all world citizens today:
Churchill vs FDR: The Clash of Two Paradigms
Elliot’s account of the 1941-1945 clash of paradigms between his father and Churchill are invaluable both for their ability to shed light into the true noble constitutional character of America personified in the person of Roosevelt but also in demonstrating the beautiful potential of a world that SHOULD HAVE BEEN had certain unnatural events not intervened to derail the evolution of our species into an age of win-win cooperation, creative reason and harmony.
In As He Saw It, Elliot documents a conversation he had with his father at the beginning of America’s entry into WWII, who made his anti-colonial intentions clear as day saying:
“I’m talking about another war, Elliott. I’m talking about what will happen to our world, if after this war we allow millions of people to slide back into the same semi-slavery!
“Don’t think for a moment, Elliott, that Americans would be dying in the Pacific tonight, if it hadn’t been for the shortsighted greed of the French and the British and the Dutch. Shall we allow them to do it all, all over again? Your son will be about the right age, fifteen or twenty years from now.
“One sentence, Elliott. Then I’m going to kick you out of here. I’m tired. This is the sentence: When we’ve won the war, I will work with all my might and main to see to it that the United States is not wheedled into the position of accepting any plan that will further France’s imperialistic ambitions, or that will aid or abet the British Empire in its imperial ambitions.”
This clash came to a head during a major confrontation between FDR and Churchill during the January 24, 1943 Casablanca Conference in Morocco. At this event, Elliot documents how his father first confronted Churchill’s belief in the maintenance of the British Empire’s preferential trade agreements upon which it’s looting system was founded:
“Of course,” he [FDR] remarked, with a sly sort of assurance, “of course, after the war, one of the preconditions of any lasting peace will have to be the greatest possible freedom of trade.”
He paused. The P.M.’s head was lowered; he was watching Father steadily, from under one eyebrow.
“No artificial barriers,” Father pursued. “As few favored economic agreements as possible. Opportunities for expansion. Markets open for healthy competition.” His eye wandered innocently around the room.
Churchill shifted in his armchair. “The British Empire trade agreements” he began heavily, “are—”
Father broke in. “Yes. Those Empire trade agreements are a case in point. It’s because of them that the people of India and Africa, of all the colonial Near East and Far East, are still as backward as they are.”
Churchill’s neck reddened and he crouched forward. “Mr. President, England does not propose for a moment to lose its favored position among the British Dominions. The trade that has made England great shall continue, and under conditions prescribed by England’s ministers.”
“You see,” said Father slowly, “it is along in here somewhere that there is likely to be some disagreement between you, Winston, and me.
“I am firmly of the belief that if we are to arrive at a stable peace it must involve the development of backward countries. Backward peoples. How can this be done? It can’t be done, obviously, by eighteenth-century methods. Now—”
“Who’s talking eighteenth-century methods?”
“Whichever of your ministers recommends a policy which takes wealth in raw materials out of a colonial country, but which returns nothing to the people of that country in consideration. Twentieth-century methods involve bringing industry to these colonies. Twentieth-century methods include increasing the wealth of a people by increasing their standard of living, by educating them, by bringing them sanitation—by making sure that they get a return for the raw wealth of their community.”
Around the room, all of us were leaning forward attentively. Hopkins was grinning. Commander Thompson, Churchill’s aide, was looking glum and alarmed. The P.M. himself was beginning to look apoplectic.
“You mentioned India,” he growled.
“Yes. I can’t believe that we can fight a war against fascist slavery, and at the same time not work to free people all over the world from a backward colonial policy.”
“What about the Philippines?”
“I’m glad you mentioned them. They get their independence, you know, in 1946. And they’ve gotten modern sanitation, modern education; their rate of illiteracy has gone steadily down…”
“There can be no tampering with the Empire’s economic agreements.”
“They’re artificial…”
“They’re the foundation of our greatness.”
“The peace,” said Father firmly, “cannot include any continued despotism. The structure of the peace demands and will get equality of peoples. Equality of peoples involves the utmost freedom of competitive trade. Will anyone suggest that Germany’s attempt to dominate trade in central Europe was not a major contributing factor to war?”
It was an argument that could have no resolution between these two men…
The following day, Elliot describes how the conversation continued between the two men with Churchill stating:
“Mr. President,” he cried, “I believe you are trying to do away with the British Empire. Every idea you entertain about the structure of the postwar world demonstrates it. But in spite of that”—and his forefinger waved—”in spite of that, we know that you constitute our only hope. And”—his voice sank dramatically—”you know that we know it. You know that we know that without America, the Empire won’t stand.”
Churchill admitted, in that moment, that he knew the peace could only be won according to precepts which the United States of America would lay down. And in saying what he did, he was acknowledging that British colonial policy would be a dead duck, and British attempts to dominate world trade would be a dead duck, and British ambitions to play off the U.S.S.R. against the U.S.A. would be a dead duck. Or would have been, if Father had lived.”
This story was delivered in full during an August 15 lecture by the author:
FDR’s Post-War Vision Destroyed
While FDR’s struggle did change the course of history, his early death during the first months of his fourth term resulted in a fascist perversion of his post-war vision.
Rather than see the IMF, World Bank or UN used as instruments for the internationalization of the New Deal principles to promote long term, low interest loans for the industrial development of former colonies, FDR’s allies were ousted from power over his dead body, and they were recaptured by the same forces who attempted to steer the world towards a Central Banking Dictatorship in 1933.
The American Liberty League spawned into various “patriotic” anti-communist organizations which took power with the FBI and McCarthyism under the fog of the Cold War. This is the structure that Eisenhower warned about when he called out “the Military Industrial Complex” in 1960 and which John Kennedy did battle with during his 900 days as president.
This is the structure which is out to destroy President Donald Trump and undo the November elections under a military coup and Civil War out of fear that a new FDR impulse is beginning to be revived in America which may align with the 21st Century international New Deal emerging from China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Eurasian alliance. French Finance Minister Bruno LeMaire and Marc Carney have stated their fear that if the Green New Deal isn’t imposed by the west, then the New Silk Road and yuan will become the basis for the new world system.
The Bank of England-authored Green New Deal being pushed under the fog of COVID-19’s Great Green Global Reset which promise to impose draconian constraints on humanity’s carrying capacity in defense of saving nature from humanity have nothing to do with Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and they have less to do with the Bretton Woods conference of 1944. These are merely central bankers’ wet dreams for depopulation and fascism “with a democratic face” which their 1923 and 1933 efforts failed to achieve and can only be imposed if people remain blind to their own recent history.
This originally appeared on The Saker.


lewrockwell--2020-09-21--Inflation as a Tool of the Radical Left

Inflation as a Tool of the Radical Left

“ Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch its currency….Lenin was certainly right .
There is no subtler , no surer way of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency .
The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction , and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.
” Keynes does not provide a concrete source backing his words but deliberately used the phrase “ is said to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As Frank W. Fetter ( 1899–1991 ) pointed out , there is no evidence at hand that Lenin actually said or wrote these words , and anyone quoting Lenin on inflation would be indeed be referring to Keynes ’ s opinion .
Be that as it may , it is pretty obvious that Lenin had a good understanding of the evils of inflation caused by the issuance of large amounts of unbacked paper money .
He writes : The Economic Consequen ... Keynes , John Maynard Buy New $ 4.75 Indeed price inflation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of money does not only cause serious economic problems .
It also brings severe sociopolitical problems .
Inflation makes most people poorer , degrades their social status , destroys their dreams of a better life .
People become desperate and open to radical political programs .
In times of high inflation , all too often political agitators succeed in making people believe that the free market , capitalism , is to be held responsible for their plight .
They promise that the collectivist-socialist program offers the solution—like , say , imposing price stops @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and taxing the “ rich , ” controlling capital flows , etc .
That said , it becomes clear that ramping up inflation is actually a proper tool for those political forces that wish to overthrow the existing economic and social order—to get rid of what little is left of the free market system , as desired especially by those inspired by Marxist or Neo-Marxist ideas .
In a nutshell , militant Marxism wants to topple capitalism by means of a bloody revolution .
Neo-Marxism follows a different strategy .
It wants its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and ideological hegemony.
” Once this is achieved , people will have no other choice than adopting socialism .
The supporters of Neo-Marxism attack people ’ s values—family , hard work , thriftiness—stir conflict among people , discredit Christianity , and manipulate language ( via calling for “ political correctness ” ) to estrange people from their societal order , moving them away from the capitalist economy .
The Communist Manifesto Friedrich Engels Best Price : $ 3.07 Buy New $ 2.26 Neo-Marxists blame all evils in the world—economic crises , unemployment , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , etc.—on capitalism .
At the same time , socialism is said to fix things , to set things straight , and to create a better world : more peaceful , just , and fulfilling people ’ s real needs .
Neo-Marxism is alive and kicking .
It has increasingly found its way into the political mainstream .
For instance , the so-called political elite in many countries advocates a “ Great Reset , ” a “ new world order , ” to transform the economies , steering them away from the free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy is already being used to finance the state and its expansion .
However , in most advanced countries the rate of inflation has been kept relatively low , that is , at a level that has not been stirring up outright public unrest .
Inflationary policy follows the motto “ Milk the cows , don ’ t kill the cows.
” What if Neo-Marxism makes it into central banks ’ monetary policymaking ?
Well , you could say that it has already succeeded in doing so , for the concept of central @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In their Communist Manifesto , Karl Marx ( 1818–83 ) and Friedrich Engels ( 1820–78 ) set up a list of ten “ means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.
” Among them is “ Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state , by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
” However , Neo-Marxism has not yet mustered sufficient supporters of outright monetary destruction , that is , a policy of very high inflation , for triggering an economic and societal revolution .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Buy New $ 23.95 This is no reason for relief , though .
As noted earlier , Neo-Marxist ideas have been gaining ground in basically all kinds of policy—education , law and order , transportation , conservation , money and credit , you name it .
And so it would be consistent if Neo-Marxism increasingly undermined the consensus that relatively low goods price inflation is beneficial .
It is in this context that the US Federal Reserve ’ s latest change to its inflation target deserves mentioning .
In August 2020 the Fed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2 percent inflation goal only on average in the long term .
This means that the Fed will allow for inflation in excess of 2 percent if and when inflation is below 2 percent in preceding periods .
The reason is obvious : the Fed is monetizing debt on an epic scale , through which it increases the quantity of money heavily .
By the end of August 2020 , the US money stock M1 had grown 40 percent compared to last year , M2 by 23 percent .
The increased quantity of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most likely to be reflected in higher prices , be it consumer and/or asset prices .
This may not be fueled by a deliberate Neo-Marxist creed , but the Fed—and this holds true for other central banks as well—is certainly playing into the Neo-Marxist goal to shatter civic order , to drive people into socialism , and this is achieved as Lenin allegedly suggested : through the debasement of the purchasing power of money .
John Maynard Keynes , The Economic Consequence of the Peace ( London : Macmillan and Co. , Limited @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whison Fetter , “ Lenin , Keynes and Inflation , ” Economica 44 , no .
173 ( 1977 ) : 77–80 .
V. I. Lenin , The Impending Catastrophe and How to Combat It ( 1917 ; Moscow : Progress Publishers , 1975 ) .
Note : The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute .
The Best of Thorsten Polleit

“Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch its currency….Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer way of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”
Keynes does not provide a concrete source backing his words but deliberately used the phrase “is said to have declared.” For a good reason. As Frank W. Fetter (1899–1991) pointed out, there is no evidence at hand that Lenin actually said or wrote these words, and anyone quoting Lenin on inflation would be indeed be referring to Keynes’s opinion.
Be that as it may, it is pretty obvious that Lenin had a good understanding of the evils of inflation caused by the issuance of large amounts of unbacked paper money. He writes: The Economic Consequen... Keynes, John Maynard Buy New $4.75 (as of 05:16 UTC - Details)
There is another side to the problem of raising the fixed grain prices. This raising of prices involves a new chaotic increase in the issuing of paper money, a further increase in the cost of living, increased financial disorganisation and the approach of financial collapse. Everybody admits that the issuing of paper money constitutes the worst form of compulsory loan, that it most of all affects the conditions of the workers, of the poorest section of the population, and that it is the chief evil engendered by financial disorder.
Indeed price inflation caused by the increase in the quantity of money does not only cause serious economic problems. It also brings severe sociopolitical problems. Inflation makes most people poorer, degrades their social status, destroys their dreams of a better life. People become desperate and open to radical political programs.
In times of high inflation, all too often political agitators succeed in making people believe that the free market, capitalism, is to be held responsible for their plight. They promise that the collectivist-socialist program offers the solution—like, say, imposing price stops or price controls, raising corporate taxes and taxing the “rich,” controlling capital flows, etc.
That said, it becomes clear that ramping up inflation is actually a proper tool for those political forces that wish to overthrow the existing economic and social order—to get rid of what little is left of the free market system, as desired especially by those inspired by Marxist or Neo-Marxist ideas.
In a nutshell, militant Marxism wants to topple capitalism by means of a bloody revolution. Neo-Marxism follows a different strategy. It wants its ideas to attain “cultural, moral and ideological hegemony.” Once this is achieved, people will have no other choice than adopting socialism.
The supporters of Neo-Marxism attack people’s values—family, hard work, thriftiness—stir conflict among people, discredit Christianity, and manipulate language (via calling for “political correctness”) to estrange people from their societal order, moving them away from the capitalist economy. The Communist Manifesto Friedrich Engels Best Price: $3.07 Buy New $2.26 (as of 06:31 UTC - Details)
Neo-Marxists blame all evils in the world—economic crises, unemployment, income gaps, racism, ecological damage, etc.—on capitalism. At the same time, socialism is said to fix things, to set things straight, and to create a better world: more peaceful, just, and fulfilling people’s real needs.
Neo-Marxism is alive and kicking. It has increasingly found its way into the political mainstream. For instance, the so-called political elite in many countries advocates a “Great Reset,” a “new world order,” to transform the economies, steering them away from the free market system.
Of course, inflationary policy is already being used to finance the state and its expansion. However, in most advanced countries the rate of inflation has been kept relatively low, that is, at a level that has not been stirring up outright public unrest. Inflationary policy follows the motto “Milk the cows, don’t kill the cows.”
What if Neo-Marxism makes it into central banks’ monetary policymaking? Well, you could say that it has already succeeded in doing so, for the concept of central banking is essentially a Marxist one. In their Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx (1818–83) and Friedrich Engels (1820–78) set up a list of ten “means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.”
Among them is “Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.” However, Neo-Marxism has not yet mustered sufficient supporters of outright monetary destruction, that is, a policy of very high inflation, for triggering an economic and societal revolution.
The Impending Catastro... Lenin, Vladimir Ilich Buy New $23.95 (as of 05:16 UTC - Details) This is no reason for relief, though. As noted earlier, Neo-Marxist ideas have been gaining ground in basically all kinds of policy—education, law and order, transportation, conservation, money and credit, you name it. And so it would be consistent if Neo-Marxism increasingly undermined the consensus that relatively low goods price inflation is beneficial.
It is in this context that the US Federal Reserve’s latest change to its inflation target deserves mentioning. In August 2020 the Fed announced that it aims to achieve its 2 percent inflation goal only on average in the long term. This means that the Fed will allow for inflation in excess of 2 percent if and when inflation is below 2 percent in preceding periods.
The reason is obvious: the Fed is monetizing debt on an epic scale, through which it increases the quantity of money heavily. By the end of August 2020, the US money stock M1 had grown 40 percent compared to last year, M2 by 23 percent. The increased quantity of money will, sooner or later, most likely to be reflected in higher prices, be it consumer and/or asset prices.
This may not be fueled by a deliberate Neo-Marxist creed, but the Fed—and this holds true for other central banks as well—is certainly playing into the Neo-Marxist goal to shatter civic order, to drive people into socialism, and this is achieved as Lenin allegedly suggested: through the debasement of the purchasing power of money.
—
John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequence of the Peace (London: Macmillan and Co., Limited), p. 285.
See Frank Whison Fetter, “Lenin, Keynes and Inflation,” Economica 44, no. 173 (1977): 77–80.
V. I. Lenin, The Impending Catastrophe and How to Combat It (1917; Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1975).
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
The Best of Thorsten Polleit


lewrockwell--2020-09-21--The Miracle of Ancient Ways

The Miracle of Ancient Ways

To come before you so I thought that you should know There is a strange idea abroad that in every subject the ancient books should be read only by the professionals , and that the amateur should content himself with the modern books .
– On Reading Old Books , by C.S .
Lewis ( Chapter 7 from this collection ) Lewis , although he is a writer , would suggest reading the old if one must choose between old and new .
A new book I still on trial , as Lewis puts it , not yet judged by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ picked through – yes with errors , but not so dangerous as the errors in the new ; regarding the new : ARSUXEO Winter Warm UP ... Buy New $ 34.99 Where they are true they will give us truths which we half knew already .
Where they are false they will aggravate the error with which we are already dangerously ill .
In contrast , regarding the old books : They will not flatter us in the errors we are already committing ; and their own errors , being now open and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lewis will offer that two heads are better than one , not because either is infallible but because it is unlikely that they will be fallible in the same direction .
He offers a discussion on the divisions within Christianity ; oh , we fight like cats and dogs about these .
Given that Lewis came to Christianity later in life , he suggests that from the outside , these divisions are not so obvious or important .
I think about this often – and it is true in Christianity just as it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ libertarians as an example ) .
Relative to the views of those outside , there really is nothing of meaningful disagreement within the in-group .
We are all rightly distressed , and ashamed also , at the divisions of Christendom .
But those who have always lived within the Christian fold may be too easily dispirited by them .
They are bad , but such people do not know what it looks like from without .
Lewis describes this agreement on the meaningful things in his opening chapters of Mere Christianity , writing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Christ ’ s death has somehow put us right with God and given us a fresh start .
There are three things that spread the Christ-life to us : baptism , belief , and that mysterious action which different Christians call by different names – Holy Communion , the Mass , the Lord ’ s Supper .
I am reminded of the first sermon offered by Peter after the Resurrection and Ascension : Peter preached the Resurrection , and three-thousand were added to their number .
The rest , to varying degrees , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work , this short essay from Lewis is the introduction to a translation of a book by St. Athanasius : De Incarnatione – on the Incarnation of the Eord of God .
Athanasius was a fourth century Christian theologian , a Church Father , the chief defender of Trinitarianism against Arianism , and a noted Egyptian leader of the fourth century .
H2H Mens Casual Slim F ... Buy New $ 24.99 He is venerated by the Oriental and Eastern Orthodox Churches , the Catholic Church , the Lutheran churches , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in his account : “ Athanasius was the greatest champion of Catholic belief on the subject of the Incarnation that the Church has ever known and in his lifetime earned the characteristic title of “ Father of Orthodoxy ” , by which he has been distinguished ever since.
” He was the first to identify the 27 books of the New Testament , still recognized today .
Lewis describes his book on the Incarnation as a masterpiece .
Yes , we know We have no need for ancient ways Our world is doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing fine .
We have a need for ancient ways .
More precisely , a return to the center .
The Best of Bionic Mosquito

I know it’s most unusual
To come before you so
But I’ve found an ancient miracle
I thought that you should know
– Rush, 2112
There is a strange idea abroad that in every subject the ancient books should be read only by the professionals, and that the amateur should content himself with the modern books.
– On Reading Old Books, by C.S. Lewis (Chapter 7 from this collection)
Lewis, although he is a writer, would suggest reading the old if one must choose between old and new. A new book I still on trial, as Lewis puts it, not yet judged by time. The older books have been picked through – yes with errors, but not so dangerous as the errors in the new; regarding the new: ARSUXEO Winter Warm UP... Buy New $34.99 (as of 05:17 UTC - Details)
Where they are true they will give us truths which we half knew already. Where they are false they will aggravate the error with which we are already dangerously ill.
In contrast, regarding the old books:
They will not flatter us in the errors we are already committing; and their own errors, being now open and palpable, will not endanger us.
Lewis will offer that two heads are better than one, not because either is infallible but because it is unlikely that they will be fallible in the same direction.
He offers a discussion on the divisions within Christianity; oh, we fight like cats and dogs about these. Given that Lewis came to Christianity later in life, he suggests that from the outside, these divisions are not so obvious or important.
I think about this often – and it is true in Christianity just as it is true for any in-group (take libertarians as an example). Relative to the views of those outside, there really is nothing of meaningful disagreement within the in-group.
We are all rightly distressed, and ashamed also, at the divisions of Christendom. But those who have always lived within the Christian fold may be too easily dispirited by them. They are bad, but such people do not know what it looks like from without.
Lewis describes this agreement on the meaningful things in his opening chapters of Mere Christianity, writing:
The central Christian belief is that Christ’s death has somehow put us right with God and given us a fresh start.
There are three things that spread the Christ-life to us: baptism, belief, and that mysterious action which different Christians call by different names – Holy Communion, the Mass, the Lord’s Supper.
I am reminded of the first sermon offered by Peter after the Resurrection and Ascension: Peter preached the Resurrection, and three-thousand were added to their number. The rest, to varying degrees, is detail.
Returning to the current work, this short essay from Lewis is the introduction to a translation of a book by St. Athanasius: De Incarnatione – on the Incarnation of the Eord of God. Athanasius was a fourth century Christian theologian, a Church Father, the chief defender of Trinitarianism against Arianism, and a noted Egyptian leader of the fourth century. H2H Mens Casual Slim F... Buy New $24.99 (as of 05:17 UTC - Details)
He is venerated by the Oriental and Eastern Orthodox Churches, the Catholic Church, the Lutheran churches, and the Anglican Communion.
Historian Cornelius Clifford said in his account: “Athanasius was the greatest champion of Catholic belief on the subject of the Incarnation that the Church has ever known and in his lifetime earned the characteristic title of “Father of Orthodoxy”, by which he has been distinguished ever since.”
He was the first to identify the 27 books of the New Testament, still recognized today.
Lewis describes his book on the Incarnation as a masterpiece.
Conclusion
Yes, we know
It’s nothing new
It’s just a waste of time
We have no need for ancient ways
Our world is doing fine
No, our world is not doing fine.
We have a need for ancient ways. More precisely, a return to the center.
Reprinted with permission from Bionic Mosquito.
The Best of Bionic Mosquito