lewrockwell--2020-12-16--Several Covid-19 Vaccines Are Made Using Aborted Fetal Cells

In addition to standard concerns over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is the moral dilemma of taking vaccines made with aborted fetal cells .
For many , this alone is a cause for objection .
Several of the vaccine candidates , including AstraZeneca ’ s COVID-19 vaccine , are made using aborted fetal cell lines.1,2 Several fact checkers — including Politifact,3 The Associated Press4 and Snopes5 — have labeled the claim as “ false , ” but is it ?
As it turns out , fact checkers are relying on semantics to “ debunk ” this claim .
In reality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ determine the truth of the matter once the details are explained .
Semantics and Technicalities Used to ‘ Debunk ’ the Truth A common mistake by less experienced citizen journalists is to use rather general terms , assuming people will “ get the gist ” without having to be overly specific , and this is precisely what self-declared fact checkers home in on when rating something false or misleading .
The Children ’ s P ...
Check Amazon for Pricing .
Fact checkers routinely rely on semantics and technicalities to break apart a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ read their explanation , you ’ re likely to miss this and simply write it off based on the headline claiming something to be false .
The case of COVID-19 vaccines containing aborted fetal cells is a perfect example of this , so let ’ s go through some of what you need to know before discounting this claim off-hand .
There are several cell lines commonly used in vaccine development that originate from aborted fetuses , including:6 • HEK293 , , , , — human embryonic cell line originally derived from kidney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Netherlands in 1972 • MRC5 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 14-week-old male fetus aborted in 1966 • PER.C6 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the retina of an 18-week-old male fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1985 • WI38 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 12-week-old female fetus aborted in 1961 Vaccine makers using at least one of these fetal cell lines in the development of their COVID-19 vaccines include:15,16,17 Vaccine makers using either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meaning cell lines that do not originate from aborted human fetuses , or no cell lines at all , include Moderna , Merck , Novavax , Sanofi Pasteur , Pfizer , Inovio Pharmaceuticals , GlaxoSmithKline and Sinovac.18 Now , the claim made by some citizen journalists is that certain COVID-19 vaccines “ contain cells from an aborted fetus.
” One video headline stated : “ CONFIRMED — aborted fetus in COVID-19 vaccine.
” 19 Fact checkers have “ debunked ” these claims and labeled them false , in one instance because the name @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and in others because the vaccines do not literally “ contain ” these cells ; rather , the fetal cell lines were used as a growth medium for the virus during the production phase .
Kamik unisex child Sno ... Buy New $ 39.99 In yet other instances , fact checkers have slapped a false label on it by claiming the cell lines are not the original cells but , rather , clones thereof.21 All of these justifications are really all about semantics .
What most people are referring to when they object @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that an aborted fetus was used .
Period .
While some may indeed be concerned about the actual , literal inclusion of fetal cells in the finished vaccine , typically , it ’ s simply a moral objection to the use of aborted fetuses in medical research and development .
So , labeling the claim that “ COVID-19 vaccines contain fetal cells ” as “ false ” can actually be just as misleading , as this ignores the moral issue of aborted fetuses being used in medicine , and in fact makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not happening .
Again , you ’ d have to read the whole fact checking article to see that fetal cell lines are indeed used in the development of some of these vaccines , and the “ false ” label is based on some technical detail or specificity of the verbiage .
How Are Fetal Cell Lines Used in Vaccine Development ?
So , what is a fetal cell line , really , and how is it used in vaccine development ?
Simplified layman ’ s answers to these questions can be found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & Fetal Cell Lines , ” created by the Charlotte Lozier Institute .
The following illustrations and descriptions are taken from the first page of that fact sheet .
The bottom illustration shows the specific role of these cell lines .
The cells are used as a growth medium for the virus , since the virus needs a living cell to infect and multiply in .
The viruses are then harvested from the cells and purified ( and inactivated in the case of inactivated vaccines ) before being added to the final vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Politifact ’ s fact check of the fetal cell claim:23 Similarly , The Associated Press fact checking article included a quote by Dr. Deepak Shrivastava , president of Gladstone Institutes , who stated:24 UGG Kids ’ Neumel ... Buy New $ 109.95 Again , for many , the issue is not that the vaccine might contain actual cells from an aborted fetus .
It ’ s the fact that a fetus was used in the production — in any way .
For some , this is the only thing that matters .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a growth medium is fine as long as the cells are not injected along with the vaccine .
Either way , fact checkers are clearly trying to dissuade people from having a public conversation about the ethics of using aborted fetuses in vaccine development .
The fact is , fetal cells ARE used during production of certain vaccines , and some may object to getting those vaccines because they object to abortion and/or feel it ’ s unethical to harvest aborted fetuses for their tissues .
There ’ s also the issue of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with the public prior to vaccination .
After all , there are other vaccines grown in animal cells , for example , which might be a more ethical choice for some people , but to make that choice , they must be given the information .
The claim that fetal cells are not used in vaccine development because they are clones of the original is perhaps the most ludicrous justification used by fact checkers.25 That ’ s like saying your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your body because all the cells are mere copies of the cells found in the original fetus that grew inside your mother .
Cells grow and multiply naturally .
The cells in your adult body are no longer the original individual cells of you as a fetus .
They are in essence “ clones ” of the originals .
They ’ ve been growing and multiplying , dying and being replaced , with each passing moment from the time of your conception when a sperm entered an egg .
There ’ s virtually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indefinitely in a petri dish and cells growing and multiplying in your body during your lifetime .
If the cells in your body are still you , then the cells in the petri dish are still that of the original fetus that was aborted .
Some may also object to vaccines manufactured through the use of fetal cell lines on the basis that there may be health risks involved , due to potential DNA contamination .
In a 2011 scientific review,26 Helen Ratajczak , a former drug company scientist , linked the introduction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ production ( among other things ) to the rapid rise in autism .
On page 70 of her paper , Ratajczak explains this particular connection:27 Another paper28 focusing on the health consequences of vaccines made with the help of fetal cell lines was published in 2015 .
These authors also stress that fetal cell lines used in vaccine development can cause the vaccine to be contaminated with human DNA — which has happened with certain MMR vaccines — and that this DNA contamination may play a role in autism and autoimmune diseases .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Active Q ... Buy New $ 68.99 In 2019 , one of the four authors of that 2015 paper , Dr. Theresa Deisher , wrote an open letter29 to legislators , reviewing the hazard of fetal cell DNA in vaccines .
In it , she wrote:30 Disturbingly , the public is now being reprogrammed to view side effects of vaccination as a natural occurrence by renaming adverse reactions as “ immune responses.
” A December 1 , 2020 , CNBC article,31 which looked at the frequency of adverse reactions , noted that 10 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Pfizer and Moderna trials reported “ significantly noticeable ” side effects .
At the bottom of the article is a suggestion from a past advisory committee member , who proposes the nomenclature of “ serious adverse reaction ” be changed to “ immune response , ” so they can change the way people view these side effects , even if they end up having to stay home from work because of them , which appears quite possible .
Dr. Eli Perencevich , a professor of internal medicine and epidemiology at the University @ @ @ @ @ @ @ essential workers should be granted three days of paid leave after they ’ re vaccinated , as many will feel too sick to work.32 Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that the vaccine ’ s side effects are “ no walk in the park.
” 33 An October 1 , 2020 , report34 by CNBC reviewed the experiences of five participants in Moderna ’ s and Pfizer ’ s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials .
One of the participants in Pfizer ’ s vaccine trial “ woke up with chills , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after taking the second dose.
” A Moderna trial participant told CNBC he had a low-grade fever and felt “ under the weather ” for several days after his first shot .
Eight hours after his second shot he was “ bed-bound with a fever of over 101 , shakes , chills , a pounding headache and shortness of breath .
He hardly slept that night , recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.
” 35 Regulators in the U.K. are also warning people to avoid Pfizer ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of severe allergic reactions to vaccines , medicine or food .
They also warn the vaccine should only be given in facilities with resuscitation capabilities.36 A group of researchers have also expressed concern that some COVID-19 vaccine candidates might put certain people at a higher risk of acquiring HIV , the virus that causes AIDS.37,38,39 Using the failed attempt to create an HIV vaccine as an example , researchers explain40 that the genetically engineered adenovirus , Ad5 , used in the HIV vaccine trials , is the same one being used now in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. , Russia and Pakistan .
At the time of the failed HIV vaccine , scientists were unable to identify the exact reason why Ad5 seemed to increase the risk of HIV ; it just inexplicably did .
Interestingly , Dr. Anthony Fauci was the lead author on the HIV study,41 in which he questioned “ whether the problem extends to some or all of the other recombinant vectors currently in development or to other vector-based vaccines.
” Reflecting on that question , the researchers say they decided to go public with this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence , and they believe that informed consent about the HIV/AIDS risk should be part of the COVID-19 clinical studies .
At least two participants in the AstraZeneca trial have also developed transverse myelitis ( severe inflammation of the spinal cord ) and a participant in India ’ s AstraZeneca trial is suing the company claiming the vaccine caused “ serious neurological damage.
” 42 Meanwhile , a 70-year-old Philadelphia priest who participated in Moderna ’ s Phase 3 trial has died.43 It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine or a placebo .
It ’ s worth noting that the number needed to vaccinate in order to prevent one case of COVID-19 is 256 for Pfizer ’ s vaccine44 and 167 for Moderna ’ s,45 so hundreds of people will be risking their health to potentially prevent a single individual from getting sick .
Add to that the fact that the vaccines are only evaluated for their ability to reduce symptoms of COVID-19 , regardless of their severity .
It ’ s entirely unknown whether they ’ ll actually lower @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death .
I ’ ve written several articles discussing the potential problems with COVID-19 vaccines , and these risks are made all the more concerning considering you can expect little help if you do end up being harmed by the vaccine .
As explained by Dr. Meryl Nass in a December 4 , 2020 , blog post:46 As noted by Nass , the CICP is administered within the Department of Health and Human Services ( DHHS ) , which is also sponsoring the COVID-19 vaccination program .
This conflict of interest makes the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the vaccine .
Your only route of appeal is within the DHHS , where your case would simply be reviewed by another employee .
The DHHS is also responsible for making the payment .
“ DHHS therefore essentially acts as the judge , jury and defendant , ” Nass writes.47 What ’ s more , while the NVICP pays some of the costs associated with any given claim , the CICP does not .
This means you ’ ll also be responsible for attorney fees and expert witness fees , for example @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the maximum payout you can receive — even in cases of permanent disability or death — is $ 250,000 per person ; however , you ’ d have to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP gives you a dime .
CICP will only pay the difference between what your insurance covers and the total payout amount established for your case .
For permanent disability , even $ 250,000 won ’ t go far .
The CICP also has a one year statute of limitations , so you have to act quickly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the COVID-19 vaccine is that no one really knows what injuries might arise , or when , making difficult to prove the injury was caused by the vaccine .
Should your employer end up making COVID-19 vaccination a condition of employment , you also can not sue your employer for vaccine-related side effects .
According to experts interviewed by CNBC , “ claims would be routed through worker ’ s compensation programs and treated as an on-the-job injury.
” 48 The Best of Joseph Mercola

In addition to standard concerns over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is the moral dilemma of taking vaccines made with aborted fetal cells. For many, this alone is a cause for objection. Several of the vaccine candidates, including AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine, are made using aborted fetal cell lines.1,2
Several fact checkers — including Politifact,3 The Associated Press4 and Snopes5 — have labeled the claim as “false,” but is it? As it turns out, fact checkers are relying on semantics to “debunk” this claim. In reality, most thinking individuals are able to determine the truth of the matter once the details are explained.
Semantics and Technicalities Used to ‘Debunk’ the Truth
A common mistake by less experienced citizen journalists is to use rather general terms, assuming people will “get the gist” without having to be overly specific, and this is precisely what self-declared fact checkers home in on when rating something false or misleading. The Children’s P... Check Amazon for Pricing.
Fact checkers routinely rely on semantics and technicalities to break apart a given claim, and unless you carefully read their explanation, you’re likely to miss this and simply write it off based on the headline claiming something to be false. The case of COVID-19 vaccines containing aborted fetal cells is a perfect example of this, so let’s go through some of what you need to know before discounting this claim off-hand.
Commonly Used Fetal Cell Lines
There are several cell lines commonly used in vaccine development that originate from aborted fetuses, including:6
HEK293 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from kidney tissue obtained from a female fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1972
— human embryonic cell line originally derived from kidney tissue obtained from a female fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1972 MRC5 12 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 14-week-old male fetus aborted in 1966
— human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 14-week-old male fetus aborted in 1966 PER.C6 13 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the retina of an 18-week-old male fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1985
— human embryonic cell line originally derived from the retina of an 18-week-old male fetus aborted in the Netherlands in 1985 WI38 14 — human embryonic cell line originally derived from the lung tissue of a 12-week-old female fetus aborted in 1961
Vaccine makers using at least one of these fetal cell lines in the development of their COVID-19 vaccines include:15,16,17
Vaccine makers using either “ethically derived” cell lines, meaning cell lines that do not originate from aborted human fetuses, or no cell lines at all, include Moderna, Merck, Novavax, Sanofi Pasteur, Pfizer, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline and Sinovac.18
The Claim
Now, the claim made by some citizen journalists is that certain COVID-19 vaccines “contain cells from an aborted fetus.” One video headline stated: “CONFIRMED — aborted fetus in COVID-19 vaccine.”19
Fact checkers have “debunked” these claims and labeled them false, in one instance because the name of the fetal cell line was incorrect,20 and in others because the vaccines do not literally “contain” these cells; rather, the fetal cell lines were used as a growth medium for the virus during the production phase. Kamik unisex child Sno... Buy New $39.99 (as of 06:28 UTC - Details)
In yet other instances, fact checkers have slapped a false label on it by claiming the cell lines are not the original cells but, rather, clones thereof.21 All of these justifications are really all about semantics. What most people are referring to when they object to the use of fetal cell lines is that an aborted fetus was used. Period.
While some may indeed be concerned about the actual, literal inclusion of fetal cells in the finished vaccine, typically, it’s simply a moral objection to the use of aborted fetuses in medical research and development.
So, labeling the claim that “COVID-19 vaccines contain fetal cells” as “false” can actually be just as misleading, as this ignores the moral issue of aborted fetuses being used in medicine, and in fact makes it sound as though it’s not happening. Again, you’d have to read the whole fact checking article to see that fetal cell lines are indeed used in the development of some of these vaccines, and the “false” label is based on some technical detail or specificity of the verbiage.
How Are Fetal Cell Lines Used in Vaccine Development?
So, what is a fetal cell line, really, and how is it used in vaccine development? Simplified layman’s answers to these questions can be found in the fact sheet22 “COVID Vaccines & Fetal Cell Lines,” created by the Charlotte Lozier Institute.
The following illustrations and descriptions are taken from the first page of that fact sheet. The bottom illustration shows the specific role of these cell lines. The cells are used as a growth medium for the virus, since the virus needs a living cell to infect and multiply in. The viruses are then harvested from the cells and purified (and inactivated in the case of inactivated vaccines) before being added to the final vaccine as one of several ingredients.
According to Politifact’s fact check of the fetal cell claim:23
“After the purification process, the final vaccine contains trillionths of a gram of fragmented DNA from the cell line … The vaccine is created from a virus grown in a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue. However, the cell line is purified away from the vaccine before it is used. It is inaccurate to claim that the vaccine ‘contains’ aborted fetal tissue.”
Similarly, The Associated Press fact checking article included a quote by Dr. Deepak Shrivastava, president of Gladstone Institutes, who stated:24
“What’s important for the public to know even if they are opposed to the use of fetal cells for therapies, these medicines that are being made and vaccines do not contain any aspect of the cells in them. The cells are used as factories for production.”
The Ethics of Fetal Cell Lines
UGG Kids’ Neumel... Buy New $109.95 (as of 06:28 UTC - Details) Again, for many, the issue is not that the vaccine might contain actual cells from an aborted fetus. It’s the fact that a fetus was used in the production — in any way. For some, this is the only thing that matters. Others may feel using these cells as a growth medium is fine as long as the cells are not injected along with the vaccine.
Either way, fact checkers are clearly trying to dissuade people from having a public conversation about the ethics of using aborted fetuses in vaccine development. The fact is, fetal cells ARE used during production of certain vaccines, and some may object to getting those vaccines because they object to abortion and/or feel it’s unethical to harvest aborted fetuses for their tissues.
There’s also the issue of disclosure. Drug companies and vaccine policymakers should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with the public prior to vaccination. After all, there are other vaccines grown in animal cells, for example, which might be a more ethical choice for some people, but to make that choice, they must be given the information.
The Nonsensical ‘Clone’ Defense
The claim that fetal cells are not used in vaccine development because they are clones of the original is perhaps the most ludicrous justification used by fact checkers.25 That’s like saying your 20-year-old or 40-year-old body is no longer your body because all the cells are mere copies of the cells found in the original fetus that grew inside your mother.
If the cells in your body are still you, then the cells in the petri dish are still that of the original fetus that was aborted.
Cells grow and multiply naturally. The cells in your adult body are no longer the original individual cells of you as a fetus. They are in essence “clones” of the originals. They’ve been growing and multiplying, dying and being replaced, with each passing moment from the time of your conception when a sperm entered an egg.
There’s virtually no difference between cells growing and multiplying indefinitely in a petri dish and cells growing and multiplying in your body during your lifetime. If the cells in your body are still you, then the cells in the petri dish are still that of the original fetus that was aborted.
Residual DNA in Vaccines Linked to Autism?
Some may also object to vaccines manufactured through the use of fetal cell lines on the basis that there may be health risks involved, due to potential DNA contamination. In a 2011 scientific review,26 Helen Ratajczak, a former drug company scientist, linked the introduction of human fetal cell lines in vaccine production (among other things) to the rapid rise in autism. On page 70 of her paper, Ratajczak explains this particular connection:27
“Data from a worldwide composite of studies show that an increase in cumulative incidence began about 1988–1990. The new version of the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine (i.e., MMR II) that did not contain thimerosal was introduced in 1979.
By 1983, only the new version was available. Autism in the United States spiked dramatically between 1983 and 1990 from 4–5/10,000 to 1/500. In 1988, two doses of MMR II were recommended to immunize those individuals who did not respond to the first injection. A spike of incidence of autism accompanied the addition of the second dose of MMR II …
It is important to note that unlike the former MMR, the rubella component of MMR II was propagated in a human cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue.
The MMR II vaccine is contaminated with human DNA from the cell line. This human DNA could be the cause of the spikes in incidence. An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue …
The human DNA from the vaccine can be randomly inserted into the recipient’s genes by homologous recombination, a process that occurs spontaneously only within a species. Hot spots for DNA insertion are found on the X chromosome in eight autism-associated genes involved in nerve cell synapse formation, central nervous system development, and mitochondrial function.
This could provide some explanation of why autism is predominantly a disease of boys. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that residual human DNA in some vaccines might cause autism.”
Fetal Cell Lines May Contaminate Vaccine With DNA
Another paper28 focusing on the health consequences of vaccines made with the help of fetal cell lines was published in 2015. These authors also stress that fetal cell lines used in vaccine development can cause the vaccine to be contaminated with human DNA — which has happened with certain MMR vaccines — and that this DNA contamination may play a role in autism and autoimmune diseases. According to the authors:
“Average single stranded DNA and double stranded DNA in Meruvax II were 142.05 ng/vial and 35.00 ng/vial, respectively, and 276.00 ng/vial and 35.74 ng/vial in Havrix respectively. The size of the fetal DNA fragments in Meruvax II was approximately 215 base pairs.
There was spontaneous cellular and nuclear DNA uptake in HFF1 and NCCIT cells. Genes that have been linked to autism (autism-associated genes; AAGs) have a more concentrated susceptibility for insults to genomic stability in comparison to the group of all genes contained within the human genome …
Vaccines manufactured in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptably high levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants. The human genome naturally contains regions that are susceptible to double strand break formation and DNA insertional mutagenesis.”
Carhartt boys Active Q... Buy New $68.99 (as of 06:28 UTC - Details) In 2019, one of the four authors of that 2015 paper, Dr. Theresa Deisher, wrote an open letter29 to legislators, reviewing the hazard of fetal cell DNA in vaccines. In it, she wrote:30
“I obtained my doctorate from Stanford University in Molecular and Cellular Physiology in 1990 and completed my post-doctoral work at the University of Washington. My career has been spent in the commercial biotechnology industry, and I have done work from basic biological and drug discovery through clinical development …
Merck’s MMR II vaccine (as well as the chickenpox, Pentacel and all Hep-A containing vaccines) is manufactured using human fetal cell lines and are heavily contaminated with human fetal DNA from the production process.
Levels in our children can reach up to 5 ng/ml after vaccination, depending on the age, weight and blood volume of the child. That level is known to activate Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), which can cause autoimmune attacks …
Anyone who says that the fetal DNA contaminating our vaccines is harmless either does not know anything about immunity and Toll- like receptors or they are not telling the truth …
Administration of fragments of human fetal (primitive) non-self DNA to a child could generate an immune response that would also cross-react with the child’s own DNA, since the contaminating DNA could have sections of overlap very similar to the child’s own DNA …
Injecting our children with human fetal DNA contaminants bears the risk of causing two well-established pathologies:
1)Insertional mutagenesis: fetal human DNA incorporates into the child’s DNA causing mutations. Gene therapy using small fragment homologous recombination has demonstrated that as low as 1.9 ng/ml of DNA fragments results in insertion into the genome of stem cells in 100% of mice injected.
The levels of human fetal DNA fragments in our children after vaccination with MMR, Varivax (chickenpox) or Hepatitis A containing vaccines reach levels beyond 1.9 ng/ml.
2)Autoimmune disease: fetal human DNA triggers a child’s immune system to attack his/her own body.”
Adverse Effects Relabeled to Minimize Safety Concerns
Disturbingly, the public is now being reprogrammed to view side effects of vaccination as a natural occurrence by renaming adverse reactions as “immune responses.” A December 1, 2020, CNBC article,31 which looked at the frequency of adverse reactions, noted that 10% to 15% of participants in the Pfizer and Moderna trials reported “significantly noticeable” side effects.
At the bottom of the article is a suggestion from a past advisory committee member, who proposes the nomenclature of “serious adverse reaction” be changed to “immune response,” so they can change the way people view these side effects, even if they end up having to stay home from work because of them, which appears quite possible.
Dr. Eli Perencevich, a professor of internal medicine and epidemiology at the University of Iowa Health Care, has suggested essential workers should be granted three days of paid leave after they’re vaccinated, as many will feel too sick to work.32 Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that the vaccine’s side effects are “no walk in the park.”33
Side Effects Are Common in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
An October 1, 2020, report34 by CNBC reviewed the experiences of five participants in Moderna’s and Pfizer’s SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. One of the participants in Pfizer’s vaccine trial “woke up with chills, shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose.”
A Moderna trial participant told CNBC he had a low-grade fever and felt “under the weather” for several days after his first shot. Eight hours after his second shot he was “bed-bound with a fever of over 101, shakes, chills, a pounding headache and shortness of breath. He hardly slept that night, recording that his temperature was higher than 100 degrees for five hours.”35
Regulators in the U.K. are also warning people to avoid Pfizer’s vaccine if you have a history of severe allergic reactions to vaccines, medicine or food. They also warn the vaccine should only be given in facilities with resuscitation capabilities.36
A group of researchers have also expressed concern that some COVID-19 vaccine candidates might put certain people at a higher risk of acquiring HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.37,38,39
Using the failed attempt to create an HIV vaccine as an example, researchers explain40 that the genetically engineered adenovirus, Ad5, used in the HIV vaccine trials, is the same one being used now in four COVID-19 candidates being studied in the U.S., Russia and Pakistan.
At the time of the failed HIV vaccine, scientists were unable to identify the exact reason why Ad5 seemed to increase the risk of HIV; it just inexplicably did. Interestingly, Dr. Anthony Fauci was the lead author on the HIV study,41 in which he questioned “whether the problem extends to some or all of the other recombinant vectors currently in development or to other vector-based vaccines.”
Reflecting on that question, the researchers say they decided to go public with this information now, because Ad5 vaccines for COVID-19 might soon be tested in populations with high HIV prevalence, and they believe that informed consent about the HIV/AIDS risk should be part of the COVID-19 clinical studies.
At least two participants in the AstraZeneca trial have also developed transverse myelitis (severe inflammation of the spinal cord) and a participant in India’s AstraZeneca trial is suing the company claiming the vaccine caused “serious neurological damage.”42 Meanwhile, a 70-year-old Philadelphia priest who participated in Moderna’s Phase 3 trial has died.43 It’s still unknown whether he received the vaccine or a placebo.
It’s worth noting that the number needed to vaccinate in order to prevent one case of COVID-19 is 256 for Pfizer’s vaccine44 and 167 for Moderna’s,45 so hundreds of people will be risking their health to potentially prevent a single individual from getting sick.
Add to that the fact that the vaccines are only evaluated for their ability to reduce symptoms of COVID-19, regardless of their severity. It’s entirely unknown whether they’ll actually lower the risk of infection, hospitalization or death.
Who Pays for COVID-19 Vaccine Damage?
I’ve written several articles discussing the potential problems with COVID-19 vaccines, and these risks are made all the more concerning considering you can expect little help if you do end up being harmed by the vaccine. As explained by Dr. Meryl Nass in a December 4, 2020, blog post:46
“If you are injured by a vaccine or other ‘countermeasure’ designated by the DHHS Secretary as intended for a pandemic or bioterrorism threat (COVID-19, pandemic flu, anthrax, smallpox) your options for receiving any financial benefit are very limited.
First, everyone involved with getting the vaccine to you has had their liability waived under the PREP Act … Congress did create a program to compensate some victims, but it is much less generous than the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) … It is called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).”
As noted by Nass, the CICP is administered within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), which is also sponsoring the COVID-19 vaccination program. This conflict of interest makes the CICP less than likely to find fault with the vaccine.
Your only route of appeal is within the DHHS, where your case would simply be reviewed by another employee. The DHHS is also responsible for making the payment. “DHHS therefore essentially acts as the judge, jury and defendant,” Nass writes.47
What’s more, while the NVICP pays some of the costs associated with any given claim, the CICP does not. This means you’ll also be responsible for attorney fees and expert witness fees, for example.
According to the CICP director, the maximum payout you can receive — even in cases of permanent disability or death — is $250,000 per person; however, you’d have to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP gives you a dime. CICP will only pay the difference between what your insurance covers and the total payout amount established for your case.
For permanent disability, even $250,000 won’t go far. The CICP also has a one year statute of limitations, so you have to act quickly. Of course, a significant problem with the COVID-19 vaccine is that no one really knows what injuries might arise, or when, making difficult to prove the injury was caused by the vaccine.
Should your employer end up making COVID-19 vaccination a condition of employment, you also cannot sue your employer for vaccine-related side effects. According to experts interviewed by CNBC, “claims would be routed through worker’s compensation programs and treated as an on-the-job injury.”48
Sources and References
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola


lewrockwell--2020-12-17--Rallies in DC for the Constitution, Election Integrity, and Trump

On December 14th I participated in my second rally/march in Washington DC for the U.S. Constitution , election integrity and President Trump .
Good vibes of a spiritual nature with an emphasis on Jesus Christ were prevalent as I rallied and marched with many high-spirited , hopeful liberty lovers from all over America .
The turnout looked impressive to me , but it was difficult to tell how many attended .
At the last march the nearly one million protesters assembled in one place at Freedom Plaza on Pennsylvania Avenue , some arriving at different times , and then marching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there were at least five stages to choose from featuring speakers and up to 100 groups doing their own thing at each location .
The main sponsor Jericho March , a Christian group , featured speakers on a main stage with jumbo screens on 9th Street at the National Mall .
Co-sponsor Stop the Steal has effectively pressured state legislators , organized rallies at seven contested states , at state capitols and at governor ’ s homes .
Another co-sponsor was Eagle Forum .
At the main stage while Gen. Mike Flynn was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aboard circled above , to the delight of the cheering , waving crowd below .
Besti Make America Gre ... Buy New $ 14.95 Hand-held flags and banners , hand-made signs , chanting , singing and praying was prevalent through the day .
Bishop Joseph Strickland offered a prayer via video .
“ We come before you , praying for our nation , a nation that proudly proclaims we are one nation under God , under your mantle of love and guidance , the Creator of all .
We pray for our nation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forgotten your word and your truth and the light of your Son , but many of us are true believers , those seeking to be disciples of your Son , guided by his light .
We are grateful for the constant intercession of the patroness of these United States , the immaculate Virgin Mary , the mother of your Son , the woman who chose by your grace and your power , to be a fitting vessel for Jesus Christ.
” Sister Dede Byrne of the Little Workers of the Sacred Hearts addressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rosary is a weapon .
Saints throughout the centuries prayed the rosary to fight against the father of lies .
Battles have been won and souls have converted to the light and healing love of Christ our savior .
For those unfamiliar to the rosary , it is a method of prayer dating back to the 12th Century to keep in order the meditations of the psalms and our Lord ’ s prayer required by religious monks throughout the centuries .
It has developed over the centuries as a method to implore our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Holy Mother to help us in our needs .
She , the woman of Genesis 3 , will crush the head of the serpent , Satan , the father of lies , who has poisoned the souls of so many in our country and has created so much confusion.
” “ The real crime scene is the electronic voting machines , ” said Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai , still fighting a legal battle against vote fraud which robbed him of a U.S. Senate seat .
He noted in 2002 electronic voting machines introduced the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secretaries of states .
Under this process , instead of one man , one vote , one candidate ’ s votes would be multiplied by 2 , his opponent by .5 .
“ They ’ ve made us all slaves with these electronic voting systems , ” said Dr. Shiva .
“ You ’ ve got to go back to your local towns and cities , destroy those machines , and demand we go back to paper ballots hand counted by all of us.
” A stage and giant screens were also set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and there were rallies at the U.S. Capitol , the Supreme Court , the Washington Monument , and at least one other location .
Smaller impromptu rallies sprang up with speakers positioning themselves on wall ledges or hills , using bullhorns instead of microphones .
At one event Friday night , Infowars ’ reporter Owen Shroyer and longtime Trump associate and Stop the Steal founder Roger Stone riled the crowd up , and Saturday night Alex Jones bull-horned hundreds in the street .
Hundreds of Proud Boys marched off and on throughout the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Antifa and BLM .
Police made 23 arrests and four people were stabbed .
Shop4ever Trump 2020 S ... Buy New $ 14.99 These hundreds of thousands of patriots who travelled from all over America – few if any of these activists are going to support Joe Biden as president .
They intend to keep fighting at the grassroots level to apply pressure on RINOs to support Trump , to exhaust all remedies in our constitutional process to assure Trump gets re-inaugurated , and even to take over the Republican Party .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away and will not tolerate a Biden presidency and a neocon-infested GOP .
Unlike the Democrats , authoritarians who crave political power now at the radical ideological level of Marxism/communism , typical Trump supporters want to be left alone to work , raise their families , spend time with friends , and enjoy their freedom .
It took the horrifying dystopic reality of 2020 under the guise of a pandemic to rock their world enough to take to the streets .
They now face the destruction of their businesses , possible forced injection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ genetically modifying toxic “ vaccination , ” and being chipped , tracked and traced by a global medical technocratic tyranny .
It took all this to get the patriots out into the streets and involved in sustained political activism .
So , will Trump be inaugurated on January 20 ?
It is interesting that D.C. businesses remain boarded up .
Is that in anticipation of riots by the left/Antifa/BLM when Trump takes the oath for a second term ?
Also noteworthy is that the Trump International Hotel and many others in D.C. are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 19th and 20th .
Why would that be when Biden has told his supporters to watch his swearing in from home ?
The constitutional process to overcome election fraud continues .
On December 14 , electors voted in seven contested states – AZ , GA , MI , NM , NV , PA and WI – for Trump .
The question is since the state legislatures did not formally select those electors , will it be sufficient for them to retroactively select them ?
Then Congress decides whether to certify the electors on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Rep. Mo Brooks has already said he will ) and one Senator also objects , Vice President Pence gets involved , and the 12th Amendment is invoked .
Best Winter Hats Adult ... Buy New $ 14.99 National Intelligence Director John Ratcliffe , a Trump supporter , is expected to publish a report on foreign interference into the election by December 18 .
This action would tie in with attorney Sidney Powell ’ s accusations that there is evidence China and Iran monitored and manipulate the presidential election using Dominion Voting Machines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Executive Order 13848 imposing sanctions on foreign countries that interfered in U.S. elections .
A press conference on the election challenge status and a call to Congress to do their job and certify Trump electors rather than Biden electors based on fraud was held in D.C. on December 15 .
Speakers included Stop the Steal ’ s National Organizer Ali Alexander who said they wanted to exhaust all constitutional remedies to restore Americans ’ faith in the election process .
President Ed Martin of Eagle Forum noted Trump campaign volunteers knocked on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ volunteers knocked on none and that fake news , fake polls and fake elections resulted in an unprecedented assault on democracy .
X Strategies CEO Alex Bluesewitz said he knew billionaires who were going to fight the RINOs and that the Michigan Attorney General had threatened the two MI Trump electors .
AZ state Rep. Anthony Kern , one of 11 Trump electors in Arizona , said , “ The constitution is at stake .
There are concerned people who have never gotten involved with politics before asking what they can do to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it was stolen .
Republicans don ’ t burn down cities , but on both sides of the aisle we need to get this right.
” Two Michigan electors for Trump , Meshawn Maddock and Marian Sheridan , said the state police by order of the governor , refused to allow them into the state capitol building .
They were accompanied by five state representatives .
A video was shown of the confrontation .
They noted the “ horrifying ” results of the forensic audit report of MI Dominion Voting Machines indicating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same software was used in more than half of the counties .
The Best of Ginny Garner

On December 14th I participated in my second rally/march in Washington DC for the U.S. Constitution, election integrity and President Trump. Good vibes of a spiritual nature with an emphasis on Jesus Christ were prevalent as I rallied and marched with many high-spirited, hopeful liberty lovers from all over America. The turnout looked impressive to me, but it was difficult to tell how many attended. At the last march the nearly one million protesters assembled in one place at Freedom Plaza on Pennsylvania Avenue, some arriving at different times, and then marching to the Supreme Court.
This time there were at least five stages to choose from featuring speakers and up to 100 groups doing their own thing at each location. The main sponsor Jericho March, a Christian group, featured speakers on a main stage with jumbo screens on 9th Street at the National Mall. Co-sponsor Stop the Steal has effectively pressured state legislators, organized rallies at seven contested states, at state capitols and at governor’s homes. Another co-sponsor was Eagle Forum. At the main stage while Gen. Mike Flynn was speaking, Marine One with President Trump aboard circled above, to the delight of the cheering, waving crowd below.
Besti Make America Gre... Buy New $14.95 (as of 04:37 UTC - Details) Hand-held flags and banners, hand-made signs, chanting, singing and praying was prevalent through the day. Bishop Joseph Strickland offered a prayer via video. “We come before you, praying for our nation, a nation that proudly proclaims we are one nation under God, under your mantle of love and guidance, the Creator of all. We pray for our nation at this time because too many have forgotten your word and your truth and the light of your Son, but many of us are true believers, those seeking to be disciples of your Son, guided by his light. We are grateful for the constant intercession of the patroness of these United States, the immaculate Virgin Mary, the mother of your Son, the woman who chose by your grace and your power, to be a fitting vessel for Jesus Christ.”
Sister Dede Byrne of the Little Workers of the Sacred Hearts addressed the crowd by video. “The rosary is a weapon. Saints throughout the centuries prayed the rosary to fight against the father of lies. Battles have been won and souls have converted to the light and healing love of Christ our savior. For those unfamiliar to the rosary, it is a method of prayer dating back to the 12th Century to keep in order the meditations of the psalms and our Lord’s prayer required by religious monks throughout the centuries. It has developed over the centuries as a method to implore our Lord through the intercessory prayer of his Holy Mother to help us in our needs. She, the woman of Genesis 3, will crush the head of the serpent, Satan, the father of lies, who has poisoned the souls of so many in our country and has created so much confusion.”
“The real crime scene is the electronic voting machines,” said Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, still fighting a legal battle against vote fraud which robbed him of a U.S. Senate seat. He noted in 2002 electronic voting machines introduced the weighted race algorithm approved by the state secretaries of states. Under this process, instead of one man, one vote, one candidate’s votes would be multiplied by 2, his opponent by .5. “They’ve made us all slaves with these electronic voting systems,” said Dr. Shiva. “You’ve got to go back to your local towns and cities, destroy those machines, and demand we go back to paper ballots hand counted by all of us.”
A stage and giant screens were also set up for speakers at Freedom Plaza, and there were rallies at the U.S. Capitol, the Supreme Court, the Washington Monument, and at least one other location. Smaller impromptu rallies sprang up with speakers positioning themselves on wall ledges or hills, using bullhorns instead of microphones. At one event Friday night, Infowars’ reporter Owen Shroyer and longtime Trump associate and Stop the Steal founder Roger Stone riled the crowd up, and Saturday night Alex Jones bull-horned hundreds in the street. Hundreds of Proud Boys marched off and on throughout the day and at night faced off with Antifa and BLM. Police made 23 arrests and four people were stabbed. Shop4ever Trump 2020 S... Buy New $14.99 (as of 04:51 UTC - Details)
These hundreds of thousands of patriots who travelled from all over America – few if any of these activists are going to support Joe Biden as president. They intend to keep fighting at the grassroots level to apply pressure on RINOs to support Trump, to exhaust all remedies in our constitutional process to assure Trump gets re-inaugurated, and even to take over the Republican Party. These awakened giants are not going to go away and will not tolerate a Biden presidency and a neocon-infested GOP. Unlike the Democrats, authoritarians who crave political power now at the radical ideological level of Marxism/communism, typical Trump supporters want to be left alone to work, raise their families, spend time with friends, and enjoy their freedom. It took the horrifying dystopic reality of 2020 under the guise of a pandemic to rock their world enough to take to the streets. They now face the destruction of their businesses, possible forced injection of a rushed, untested, experimental genetically modifying toxic “vaccination,” and being chipped, tracked and traced by a global medical technocratic tyranny. It took all this to get the patriots out into the streets and involved in sustained political activism.
So, will Trump be inaugurated on January 20? It is interesting that D.C. businesses remain boarded up. Is that in anticipation of riots by the left/Antifa/BLM when Trump takes the oath for a second term? Also noteworthy is that the Trump International Hotel and many others in D.C. are sold out on the nights of the 19th and 20th. Why would that be when Biden has told his supporters to watch his swearing in from home?
The constitutional process to overcome election fraud continues. On December 14, electors voted in seven contested states – AZ, GA, MI, NM, NV, PA and WI – for Trump. The question is since the state legislatures did not formally select those electors, will it be sufficient for them to retroactively select them? Then Congress decides whether to certify the electors on January 6. If one congressman objects (Rep. Mo Brooks has already said he will) and one Senator also objects, Vice President Pence gets involved, and the 12th Amendment is invoked.
Best Winter Hats Adult... Buy New $14.99 (as of 06:51 UTC - Details) National Intelligence Director John Ratcliffe, a Trump supporter, is expected to publish a report on foreign interference into the election by December 18. This action would tie in with attorney Sidney Powell’s accusations that there is evidence China and Iran monitored and manipulate the presidential election using Dominion Voting Machines. Then Trump would invoke 2018’s Executive Order 13848 imposing sanctions on foreign countries that interfered in U.S. elections.
A press conference on the election challenge status and a call to Congress to do their job and certify Trump electors rather than Biden electors based on fraud was held in D.C. on December 15. Speakers included Stop the Steal’s National Organizer Ali Alexander who said they wanted to exhaust all constitutional remedies to restore Americans’ faith in the election process. President Ed Martin of Eagle Forum noted Trump campaign volunteers knocked on a million doors a week while Biden volunteers knocked on none and that fake news, fake polls and fake elections resulted in an unprecedented assault on democracy. X Strategies CEO Alex Bruesewitz said he knew billionaires who were going to fight the RINOs and that the Michigan Attorney General had threatened the two MI Trump electors. AZ state Rep. Anthony Kern, one of 11 Trump electors in Arizona, said, “The constitution is at stake. There are concerned people who have never gotten involved with politics before asking what they can do to assure integrity in elections. Trump won but it was stolen. Republicans don’t burn down cities, but on both sides of the aisle we need to get this right.” Two Michigan electors for Trump, Meshawn Maddock and Marian Sheridan, said the state police by order of the governor, refused to allow them into the state capitol building. They were accompanied by five state representatives. A video was shown of the confrontation. They noted the “horrifying” results of the forensic audit report of MI Dominion Voting Machines indicating a 68% error rate and said the same software was used in more than half of the counties.

The Best of Ginny Garner


lewrockwell--2020-12-17--There Is No Judicial Branch Per the Constitution and Thomas Jefferson

Daniel Natale in this video discusses the “ third branch of the government , ” the Judicial Branch .
You all remember what we learned in schools , even university : the legislative , the executive and the judiciary ?
Except there is no third branch of government if you read the original document itself , which Natale makes clear , versus the published school and official texts .
If Biden packs the Supreme Court , they may view it as a godsend , because for all future elections that are called into question , and if they can “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” they will gain a “ titanic new power , ” the power to select presidents .
After all , they arrogated power from the legislative branch , making laws on abortion and gay marriage .
Natale cites Thomas Jefferson , who refuted the Supreme Court–or any court–having such power : The Constitution of th ... Fathers , Founding Best Price : $ 9.82 Buy New $ 9.99 “ You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions ; a very dangerous doctrine indeed , and one which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an oligarchy…their power [ is ] the more dangerous as they are in the office for life , and not responsible , as the other functionaries are , to the elective control .
The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal , knowing that to whatever hands confided , with the corruption of time and party , its members would become despots.
” The determination as to what is Constitutional and what is not is supposed to be done by the legislators .
The courts ’ only job is to “ try cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to those cases.
” Of course , that is not what has been happening for decades in America .
The judiciary ’ s actions has fulfilled the warning of Thomas Jefferson , and we see The Supreme Court has also become corrupt despots .
Thomas Jefferson : The ... Jon Meacham Best Price : $ 2.53 Buy New $ 9.24 And the erudite Natale cites Cicero and his book De Republica , and how the Constitution was created with clear understanding of his theory of a stable , enduring system of government .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ person hired equal to the person doing the hiring ?
No ; one is subordinate to the other .
The courts in the Constitution aren ’ t picking the President .
But the President in the Constitution is picking the courts.
” Of course , the oligarchs like such a system where the courts are in control ; but that is not what the American Republic was set up to be .
I urge everyone to view this short video , and share with as many as possible .
The Republic and The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 4.18 Buy New $ 8.59 ” On the Republic ... Cicero , Marcus Tullius Best Price : $ 15.90 Buy New $ 20.95 The Best of Yvonne Lorenzo

Daniel Natale in this video discusses the “third branch of the government,” the Judicial Branch. You all remember what we learned in schools, even university: the legislative, the executive and the judiciary?
Except there is no third branch of government if you read the original document itself, which Natale makes clear, versus the published school and official texts. If Biden packs the Supreme Court, they may view it as a godsend, because for all future elections that are called into question, and if they can “put their fingers on the scale,” they will gain a “titanic new power,” the power to select presidents. After all, they arrogated power from the legislative branch, making laws on abortion and gay marriage.
Natale cites Thomas Jefferson, who refuted the Supreme Court–or any court–having such power: The Constitution of th... Fathers, Founding Best Price: $9.82 Buy New $9.99 (as of 06:38 UTC - Details)
“You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would put us under the despotism of an oligarchy…their power [is] the more dangerous as they are in the office for life, and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruption of time and party, its members would become despots.”
The determination as to what is Constitutional and what is not is supposed to be done by the legislators. The courts’ only job is to “try cases and to apply the law as written to those cases.” Of course, that is not what has been happening for decades in America. The judiciary’s actions has fulfilled the warning of Thomas Jefferson, and we see The Supreme Court has also become corrupt despots. Thomas Jefferson: The ... Jon Meacham Best Price: $2.53 Buy New $9.24 (as of 06:55 UTC - Details)
And the erudite Natale cites Cicero and his book De Republica, and how the Constitution was created with clear understanding of his theory of a stable, enduring system of government. As Natale states, “Is the person hired equal to the person doing the hiring? No; one is subordinate to the other. The courts in the Constitution aren’t picking the President. But the President in the Constitution is picking the courts.”
Of course, the oligarchs like such a system where the courts are in control; but that is not what the American Republic was set up to be.
I urge everyone to view this short video, and share with as many as possible.
Comments are open on Bitchute
The Republic and The L... Cicero Best Price: $4.18 Buy New $8.59 (as of 06:38 UTC - Details) ”On the Republic... Cicero, Marcus Tullius Best Price: $15.90 Buy New $20.95 (as of 06:38 UTC - Details)
The Best of Yvonne Lorenzo


Taking Christmas Seriously

God works in strange ways .
Last weekend , two friends and I were deeply moved when we saw a theatrical production of Charles Dickens ’ “ A Christmas Carol.
” This is the famous and popular tale of the transformation and redemption of Ebenezer Scrooge from a rasping , grasping old miser into a lovable , generous old man who , late in life , becomes determined to make amends for all his extreme selfishness and his public denunciations of charity .
After a tossing-and-turning Christmas Eve night , during which he has dreams showing him lonely in his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easily alleviate , and showing future rejoicing at his death , he awakes on Christmas morning a new man .
He immediately parts with some of his wealth to the very people and institutions he formerly rejected , makes amends with relatives he had ignored , and his heart swells with joy — a joy he had never known .
It was a joy his riches had never brought him .
Theodore and Woodrow : ... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price : $ 2.00 Buy New $ 9.25 In the production we saw @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he bared his soul , at first condemning the poor for being useless ( “ are there no prisons , are there no workhouses ?
” ) and then embracing them .
This is , of course , fiction ; yet , it is based on the teachings of Jesus Christ that one can — with a firm purpose of amendment — turn to God and love Him at any time in one ’ s life , no matter one ’ s past .
In one of his final soliloquies , Scrooge questions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a new man .
Of course , he does .
And the remainder of his life is changed for the good .
I have read “ A Christmas Carol ” a half dozen times , and I have seen many theatrical and motion picture renditions of it .
This was the first time I was moved by the bravery comment .
As Scrooge approaches the end of his old life with fear and trembling , he embraces his new life with generosity and joy .
However , it is not easy , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ watching this theatrical transformation , it occurred to me that Our Lord and Savior demonstrated extraordinary bravery when he took on human form .
Taking Christmas seriously means believing that Jesus was conceived in the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary by an act of the Holy Spirit , the third person of the Blessed Trinity .
Because Jesus is both the second person of the Trinity and was born of a woman , he is true God and true man .
His nature — the hypostatic union of God and human flesh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ existence and in all time ; it is inseparable .
Thus , through the miracle of transubstantiation , which Christ performs at every Mass through the instrumentality of a Catholic priest , He is physically present .
Taking Christmas seriously means that the Holy Eucharist is not a representation of Jesus Christ ; it IS Jesus Christ .
It is His body , blood , soul and divinity .
Lies the Government To ... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price : $ 0.25 Buy New $ 4.46 All of this came about because God @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Blessed Trinity — chose a young Jewish girl in Palestine to be the mother of His son 2,000 years ago , and the girl — the Blessed Virgin Mary — said yes .
Dickens does not get into the theology of Christ ’ s birth , but he emphasizes the value of charity to human happiness and eternal salvation .
The word “ charity ” comes from the Latin “ caritas ” which means heart .
Because charity is giving from your heart , it is impossible to be charitable with someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not giving from the giver ’ s heart .
When the government claims it is being charitable with your money , it is looking for political support from those who have received what it has taken from you .
That ’ s not charity .
Charity is freely given , not governmentally taken .
Of course , the greatest charity is laying down one ’ s life for one ’ s friends .
Taking Christmas seriously means recognizing not only Jesus ’ virgin birth , not only His hypostatic union , not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ His crucifixion and resurrection .
Now back to bravery .
Jesus , who is God , spent the nine months preceding his birth as a baby in Mary ’ s womb .
Those who believe that the baby in the mother ’ s womb is not a person do not take Christmas seriously .
What do they think Jesus was in Mary ’ s womb — the second person of the Blessed Trinity , true God and true man , or a hunk of flesh ?
He was God in the womb — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a person .
Taking Christmas seriously means rejecting abortion in all its forms because it is the killing of an innocent person .
Jesus had the bravery to take Mary seriously , that she ’ d keep Him in her womb until birth and then raise him to adulthood so He could save the world from sin and darkness .
It Is Dangerous to Be ... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price : $ 1.10 Buy New $ 5.51 Taking Christmas seriously means recognizing that Jesus is , as the late great spiritual writer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This Tremendous Lover , ” that He came to call sinners , not the just , that he loves all , forbears all , forgives all , and remains with all .
Taking Christmas seriously means that by embracing His cross — by denying oneself and being charitable to others — we can rise from the dead as He did .
Taking Christmas seriously means humility , charity and abandonment to His will .
God works in strange ways and often through strange people .
Taking Christmas seriously is the lesson of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see that it is never too late to love God and to show that love through our hearts .
And the internal joy that comes from giving overwhelms the fleeting joy that comes from keeping .
The Best of Andrew P. Napolitano

Shop all books by Judge Napolitano
God works in strange ways. Last weekend, two friends and I were deeply moved when we saw a theatrical production of Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol.” This is the famous and popular tale of the transformation and redemption of Ebenezer Scrooge from a rasping, grasping old miser into a lovable, generous old man who, late in life, becomes determined to make amends for all his extreme selfishness and his public denunciations of charity.
After a tossing-and-turning Christmas Eve night, during which he has dreams showing him lonely in his youth, showing present suffering he could easily alleviate, and showing future rejoicing at his death, he awakes on Christmas morning a new man. He immediately parts with some of his wealth to the very people and institutions he formerly rejected, makes amends with relatives he had ignored, and his heart swells with joy — a joy he had never known.
It was a joy his riches had never brought him. Theodore and Woodrow: ... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price: $2.00 Buy New $9.25 (as of 12:15 UTC - Details)
In the production we saw, Scrooge gave numerous soliloquies in which he bared his soul, at first condemning the poor for being useless (“are there no prisons, are there no workhouses?”) and then embracing them. This is, of course, fiction; yet, it is based on the teachings of Jesus Christ that one can — with a firm purpose of amendment — turn to God and love Him at any time in one’s life, no matter one’s past.
In one of his final soliloquies, Scrooge questions whether he has the bravery to become a new man. Of course, he does. And the remainder of his life is changed for the good.
I have read “A Christmas Carol” a half dozen times, and I have seen many theatrical and motion picture renditions of it. This was the first time I was moved by the bravery comment. As Scrooge approaches the end of his old life with fear and trembling, he embraces his new life with generosity and joy. However, it is not easy, and he must summon much bravery.
While watching this theatrical transformation, it occurred to me that Our Lord and Savior demonstrated extraordinary bravery when he took on human form. Taking Christmas seriously means believing that Jesus was conceived in the womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary by an act of the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Blessed Trinity.
Because Jesus is both the second person of the Trinity and was born of a woman, he is true God and true man. His nature — the hypostatic union of God and human flesh — is not only unique in all existence and in all time; it is inseparable.
Thus, through the miracle of transubstantiation, which Christ performs at every Mass through the instrumentality of a Catholic priest, He is physically present. Taking Christmas seriously means that the Holy Eucharist is not a representation of Jesus Christ; it IS Jesus Christ. It is His body, blood, soul and divinity. Lies the Government To... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price: $0.25 Buy New $4.46 (as of 12:15 UTC - Details)
All of this came about because God the Father — the first person of the Blessed Trinity — chose a young Jewish girl in Palestine to be the mother of His son 2,000 years ago, and the girl — the Blessed Virgin Mary — said yes.
Dickens does not get into the theology of Christ’s birth, but he emphasizes the value of charity to human happiness and eternal salvation. The word “charity” comes from the Latin “caritas” which means heart. Because charity is giving from your heart, it is impossible to be charitable with someone else’s assets because that is not giving from the giver’s heart.
When the government claims it is being charitable with your money, it is looking for political support from those who have received what it has taken from you. That’s not charity. Charity is freely given, not governmentally taken.
Of course, the greatest charity is laying down one’s life for one’s friends. Taking Christmas seriously means recognizing not only Jesus’ virgin birth, not only His hypostatic union, not only His love of humanity, but also His crucifixion and resurrection.
Now back to bravery. Jesus, who is God, spent the nine months preceding his birth as a baby in Mary’s womb. Those who believe that the baby in the mother’s womb is not a person do not take Christmas seriously. What do they think Jesus was in Mary’s womb — the second person of the Blessed Trinity, true God and true man, or a hunk of flesh? He was God in the womb — human and divine — and very much a person.
Taking Christmas seriously means rejecting abortion in all its forms because it is the killing of an innocent person. Jesus had the bravery to take Mary seriously, that she’d keep Him in her womb until birth and then raise him to adulthood so He could save the world from sin and darkness. It Is Dangerous to Be ... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price: $1.10 Buy New $5.51 (as of 11:50 UTC - Details)
Taking Christmas seriously means recognizing that Jesus is, as the late great spiritual writer Dom Eugene Boylan called him, “This Tremendous Lover,” that He came to call sinners, not the just, that he loves all, forbears all, forgives all, and remains with all. Taking Christmas seriously means that by embracing His cross — by denying oneself and being charitable to others — we can rise from the dead as He did.
Taking Christmas seriously means humility, charity and abandonment to His will.
God works in strange ways and often through strange people. Taking Christmas seriously is the lesson of “A Christmas Carol.” Through Scrooge we see that it is never too late to love God and to show that love through our hearts. And the internal joy that comes from giving overwhelms the fleeting joy that comes from keeping.
Reprinted with the author’s permission.
The Best of Andrew P. Napolitano


lewrockwell--2020-12-17--When Deplorables Become Ungovernables

When Deplorables Become Ungovernables

China , Russia and Iran are the top three existential “ threats ” to the U.S. , according to the National Security Strategy .
Three features distinguish the top three .
They are all sovereign powers .
They are under varying degrees of sanctions .
And they are the top three nodes of the 21st century ’ s most important , evolving geopolitical process : Eurasia integration .
What do the three sovereigns see when they examine the dystopia that took over Exceptionalistan ?
They see , once again , three – discombobulated – nodes in conflict : the post-historic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – a sort of expanded Dixieland ; and the Midwest – what would be the American heartland .
The hyper-modern Pacific-Atlantic nodes congregate high-tech and finance , profit from Pentagon techno-breakthroughs and benefit from the “ America rules the waves ” ethos that guarantees the global primacy of the U.S. dollar .
Joe Biden Unauthorized ... McCormick , Mike Best Price : $ 13.70 Buy New $ 14.49 The rest of America is largely considered by the Pacific-Atlantic as just a collection of flyover states : the South – which regards itself as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Midwest , largely disciplined and quite practical-minded , squeezed ideologically between the littoral powerhouses and the South .
Superstructure , tough , is key : no matter what happens , whatever the fractures , this remains an Empire , where only a tiny elite , a de facto plutocratic oligarchy , rules .
It would be too schematic , even though essentially correct , to assert that in the presidential election , invisible campaigner Joe Biden represented the Pacific-Atlantic nodes , and Trump represented the whole South .
Assuming the election was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big “ if ” – the Midwest eventually swung based on three issues .
• Trump , as much as he relied on a sanctions juggernaut , could not bring back manufacturing jobs home .
2 .
He could not reduce the military footprint across the Greater Middle East .
3 .
And , before Covid-19 , he could not bring down immigration .
Everything that lies ahead points to the irreconcilable – pitting the absolute majority that voted Dem in the Atlantic-Pacific nodes versus the South and a deeply divided Midwest .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ isolate the South even more , their prospects of “ pacifying ” the Midwest are less than zero .
Beyond the raucous altercations on whether the presidential election was fraudulent , these are the key factual points .
Chad Hunter Biden in B ...
Check Amazon for Pricing .
• A series of rules in mostly swing states were changed , through courts , bypassing state legislatures , without transparence , before the election , paving the way to facilitate fraud schemes .
• Biden was de facto coronated by AP , Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ official result , and weeks before the electoral college vote this past Monday .
• Every serious , professional audit to determine whether all received and tabulated votes were valid was de facto squashed .
In any Global South latitude where the empire did “ interfere ” in local elections , color revolution-style , this set of facts would be regarded by scores of imperial officials , in a relentless propaganda blitz , as evidence of a coup .
On the recent Supreme Court ruling , a Deep State intel source told me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like to see half the country rioting against them , and preferred the decision be made by each state in the House of Representatives .
That is the only way to handle this without jeopardizing the union .
Even prominent Democrats I know realize that the fix took place .
The error was to steal too many votes .
This grand theft indicts the whole system , that has always been corrupt.
” Dangers abound .
On the propaganda front , for instance , far right nationalists are absolutely convinced that U.S. media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ occupying the six main offices of the top conglomerates , plus Facebook , Google and Twitter : then you ’ d have full control of the U.S. propaganda mill .
Another Deep State source , now retired , adds that , “ the U.S. Army does not want to intervene as their soldiers may not obey orders .
Many of these far right nationalists were officers in the armed forces .
They know where the nuclear missiles and bombers are .
There are many in sympathy with them as the U.S. falls apart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s dodgy dealings simply will not be made to vanish from public scrutiny .
He ’ s under four different federal investigations .
The recent subpoena amounts to a very serious case pointing to a putative crime family .
It ’ s been conveniently forgotten that Joe Biden bragged to the Council on Foreign Relations that he forced Ukraine ’ s chief prosecutor Viktor Shokin to be fired exactly when he was investigating corruption by Burisma ’ s founder .
Yesterday ’ s Man : ... Marcetic , Branko Best Price : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course , a massive army of shills will always invoke another army of omniscient and oh so impartial “ fact checkers ” to hammer the same message : “ This is Trump ’ s version .
Courts have said clearly all the evidence is baseless.
” District Attorney William Barr is now out of the picture ( see his letter of resignation ) .
Barr is a notorious Daddy Bush asset since the old days – and that means classic Deep State .
Barr knew about all federal investigations on Hunter Biden dating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laundering and bribery .
And still , as the Wall Street Journal delightfully put it , he “ worked to avoid their public disclosure during the heated election campaign ” .
A devastating report ( Dems : a Republican attack report ) has shown how the Biden family was connected to a vast financial network with multiple foreign ramifications .
Then there ’ s Barr not even daring to say there was enough reason for the Department of Justice to engage in a far-reaching investigation into voting fraud , finally putting to rest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Move on .
Nothing to see here .
Even if an evidence pile-up featured , among other instances , ballot stuffing , backdated ballots , statistical improbabilities , electronic machine tampering , software back doors , affidavits from poll workers , not to mention the by now legendary stopping the vote in the dead of night , with subsequent , huge batches of votes miraculously switching from Trump to Biden .
Once again an omniscient army of oh so impartial “ fact checkers ” will say everything is baseless .
THE HAMMER is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New $ 4.99 A perverse form of blowback is already in effect as informed global citizens may now see , crystal clear , the astonishing depth and reach of Deep State power – the ultimate decider of what happens next in Dystopia Central .
• The election stands , even if considered fraudulent by nearly half of U.S. public opinion .
To quote that peerless existentialist , The Dude , there ’ s no rug tying the room together anymore .
• Was the election to be somehow overturned before January 20 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Awe to finish the job .
In either case , The Deplorables will become The Ungovernables .
It gets worse .
A possible implosion of the union – with internal convulsions leading to a paroxysm of violence – may even be coupled with an external explosion , as in a miscalculated imperial adventure .
For the Three Sovereigns – Russia , China and Iran – as well as the overwhelming majority of the Global South , the conclusion is inescapable : if the current , sorry spectacle is the best Western liberal “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ definitely does not need any enemies or “ threats ” .
The views of individual contributors do not necessarily represent those of the Strategic Culture Foundation .

China, Russia and Iran are the top three existential “threats” to the U.S., according to the National Security Strategy. Three features distinguish the top three. They are all sovereign powers. They are under varying degrees of sanctions. And they are the top three nodes of the 21st century’s most important, evolving geopolitical process: Eurasia integration.
What do the three sovereigns see when they examine the dystopia that took over Exceptionalistan?
They see, once again, three – discombobulated – nodes in conflict: the post-historic Pacific and Atlantic coasts; the South – a sort of expanded Dixieland; and the Midwest – what would be the American heartland.
The hyper-modern Pacific-Atlantic nodes congregate high-tech and finance, profit from Pentagon techno-breakthroughs and benefit from the “America rules the waves” ethos that guarantees the global primacy of the U.S. dollar. Joe Biden Unauthorized... McCormick, Mike Best Price: $13.70 Buy New $14.49 (as of 06:03 UTC - Details)
The rest of America is largely considered by the Pacific-Atlantic as just a collection of flyover states: the South – which regards itself as the real, authentic America; and the Midwest, largely disciplined and quite practical-minded, squeezed ideologically between the littoral powerhouses and the South.
Superstructure, tough, is key: no matter what happens, whatever the fractures, this remains an Empire, where only a tiny elite, a de facto plutocratic oligarchy, rules.
It would be too schematic, even though essentially correct, to assert that in the presidential election, invisible campaigner Joe Biden represented the Pacific-Atlantic nodes, and Trump represented the whole South. Assuming the election was not fraudulent – and that remains a big “if” – the Midwest eventually swung based on three issues.
Trump, as much as he relied on a sanctions juggernaut, could not bring back manufacturing jobs home. 2. He could not reduce the military footprint across the Greater Middle East. 3. And, before Covid-19, he could not bring down immigration.
Everything that lies ahead points to the irreconcilable – pitting the absolute majority that voted Dem in the Atlantic-Pacific nodes versus the South and a deeply divided Midwest. As much as Biden-Harris is bound to isolate the South even more, their prospects of “pacifying” the Midwest are less than zero.
Whose ground control?
Beyond the raucous altercations on whether the presidential election was fraudulent, these are the key factual points. Chad Hunter Biden in B... Check Amazon for Pricing.
A series of rules in mostly swing states were changed, through courts, bypassing state legislatures, without transparence, before the election, paving the way to facilitate fraud schemes. Biden was de facto coronated by AP, Google and Twitter even before the final, official result, and weeks before the electoral college vote this past Monday. Every serious, professional audit to determine whether all received and tabulated votes were valid was de facto squashed.
In any Global South latitude where the empire did “interfere” in local elections, color revolution-style, this set of facts would be regarded by scores of imperial officials, in a relentless propaganda blitz, as evidence of a coup.
On the recent Supreme Court ruling, a Deep State intel source told me, “the Supreme Court did not like to see half the country rioting against them, and preferred the decision be made by each state in the House of Representatives. That is the only way to handle this without jeopardizing the union. Even prominent Democrats I know realize that the fix took place. The error was to steal too many votes. This grand theft indicts the whole system, that has always been corrupt.”
Dangers abound. On the propaganda front, for instance, far right nationalists are absolutely convinced that U.S. media can be brought to heel only by occupying the six main offices of the top conglomerates, plus Facebook, Google and Twitter: then you’d have full control of the U.S. propaganda mill.
Another Deep State source, now retired, adds that, “the U.S. Army does not want to intervene as their soldiers may not obey orders.
Many of these far right nationalists were officers in the armed forces. They know where the nuclear missiles and bombers are. There are many in sympathy with them as the U.S. falls apart in lockdowns.”
Meanwhile, Hunter Biden’s dodgy dealings simply will not be made to vanish from public scrutiny. He’s under four different federal investigations. The recent subpoena amounts to a very serious case pointing to a putative crime family. It’s been conveniently forgotten that Joe Biden bragged to the Council on Foreign Relations that he forced Ukraine’s chief prosecutor Viktor Shokin to be fired exactly when he was investigating corruption by Burisma’s founder. Yesterday’s Man:... Marcetic, Branko Best Price: $12.00 Buy New $13.46 (as of 03:45 UTC - Details)
Of course, a massive army of shills will always invoke another army of omniscient and oh so impartial “fact checkers” to hammer the same message: “This is Trump’s version. Courts have said clearly all the evidence is baseless.”
District Attorney William Barr is now out of the picture (see his letter of resignation). Barr is a notorious Daddy Bush asset since the old days – and that means classic Deep State. Barr knew about all federal investigations on Hunter Biden dating back to 2018, covering potential money laundering and bribery.
And still, as the Wall Street Journal delightfully put it, he “worked to avoid their public disclosure during the heated election campaign”.
A devastating report (Dems: a Republican attack report) has shown how the Biden family was connected to a vast financial network with multiple foreign ramifications.
Then there’s Barr not even daring to say there was enough reason for the Department of Justice to engage in a far-reaching investigation into voting fraud, finally putting to rest all “baseless” conspiracy theories.
Move on. Nothing to see here. Even if an evidence pile-up featured, among other instances, ballot stuffing, backdated ballots, statistical improbabilities, electronic machine tampering, software back doors, affidavits from poll workers, not to mention the by now legendary stopping the vote in the dead of night, with subsequent, huge batches of votes miraculously switching from Trump to Biden.
Once again an omniscient army of oh so impartial “fact checkers” will say everything is baseless.
A perverse blowback
THE HAMMER is the Key ... Jones, Alan Buy New $4.99 (as of 08:40 UTC - Details) A perverse form of blowback is already in effect as informed global citizens may now see, crystal clear, the astonishing depth and reach of Deep State power – the ultimate decider of what happens next in Dystopia Central.
Both options are dire.
The election stands, even if considered fraudulent by nearly half of U.S. public opinion. To quote that peerless existentialist, The Dude, there’s no rug tying the room together anymore. Was the election to be somehow overturned before January 20, the Deep State would go Shock and Awe to finish the job.
In either case, The Deplorables will become The Ungovernables.
It gets worse. A possible implosion of the union – with internal convulsions leading to a paroxysm of violence – may even be coupled with an external explosion, as in a miscalculated imperial adventure.
For the Three Sovereigns – Russia, China and Iran – as well as the overwhelming majority of the Global South, the conclusion is inescapable: if the current, sorry spectacle is the best Western liberal “democracy” has to offer, it definitely does not need any enemies or “threats”.
The views of individual contributors do not necessarily represent those of the Strategic Culture Foundation.


lewrockwell--2020-12-17--When The Elderly and Frail Die After Receiving the Covid Vaccine

CNN has the story .
And it ’ s quite a story : “ Why vaccinate our most frail ?
Odd vote out shows the dilemma ” , December 4 .
[ 1 ] “ The vote to recommend long-term care residents be among the first to receive Covid-19 vaccinations was not unanimous.
” “ Out of a panel of 14 CDC vaccine advisers , a lone doctor said no.
” “ ’ Odd woman out , I guess , ’ Dr. Helen ‘ Keipp ’ Talbot , of Vanderbilt University , told her colleagues .
‘ I still struggle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easy vote ’ .
” “ Talbot was worried about whether the vaccine would even work in such frail , vulnerable patients .
Even more , she worried about how it might look if the vaccine failed in that group , or how it would affect public perception if residents died soon after getting the vaccine.
” Decrum Brown Leather J ... Buy New $ 169.00 “ The Covid-19 vaccines have not been tested in the frail elderly , many of whom are residents of long-term care facilities.
” Let ’ s stop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we learn that the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine have not used the frail and elderly as volunteers .
Therefore , there is NO evidence that the vaccine is safe or effective in that very large group .
If this doesn ’ t give the frail and elderly and their families pause for thought , nothing will .
Second , Dr. Talbot is worried about “ public perception , ” when the elderly die right after getting the vaccination .
Well , what would YOU think if your mother died the day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The CNN article gets worse .
Read on .
Next up is a comment from Dr. Kelly Moore , “ associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition , which is supporting frontline workers who will administer Covid-19 vaccinations.
” “ ’ Since they [ the COVID vaccines ] haven ’ t been studied in people in those [ elderly ] populations , we don ’ t know how well the vaccine will work for them .
We know that most vaccines don ’ t work nearly as well in a frail elderly person @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fit and vigorous , even if they happen to be the same age , ’ Moore said.
” Again—zero evidence the COVID vaccines work in elderly and frail populations .
Most vaccines don ’ t “ work nearly as well.
” CNN : “ When shots begin to go into arms of [ nursing home and long-term care facility ] residents , Moore said Americans need to understand that deaths may occur that won ’ t necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine.
” “ ’ We would not at all be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine , not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that ’ s the place where people at the end of their lives reside , ’ Moore said.
” Bellivera Faux Suede L ... Buy New $ 45.99 “ ’ One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports , once we start vaccinating , of someone or multiple people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility .
That would be something we would expect , as a normal occurrence , because people die frequently in nursing homes ’ .
” Don ’ t worry if people who are doing reasonably well suddenly die right after getting the COVID shot .
It ’ s just a coincidence .
Their long-term health conditions just happened to kick in a day or two after vaccination .
Nothing to wonder about .
Don ’ t kick up a fuss if it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stay calm .
You can be sure the doctors will let you know if your mother died from the vaccine .
Of course they will .
Even though the vaccine has never been tested on the elderly and frail , the doctors know whether a death occurred from the vaccination or from other causes .
And they ’ ll tell the truth .
They always do .
The doctors quoted in this CNN article are obviously worried about people dying as a result of the vaccine .
They know it ’ s going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out loud about what they can do to stem the tide of public outrage—particularly from the families of those who die .
The best idea they can come up with is : “ these people die anyway.
” I remind readers that , for months , I ’ ve been reporting on the huge percentage of all so-called COVID deaths that have been occurring among the elderly in nursing homes , in long-term care facilities , in hospitals , in their homes .
[ 2 ] SID Women ’ s Lamb ... Buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suffering from multiple long-term serious health conditions .
On top of that , they had been treated for years with an array of toxic medical drugs .
And then , they ’ re absolutely terrified when they receive a diagnosis of COVID .
Then they ’ re isolated , cut off from family and friends .
And they give up and die .
NO VIRUS IS REQUIRED TO EXPLAIN THESE DEATHS .
This is forced premature killing of old people .
It ’ s murder by COVID diagnosis and isolation .
[ 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ receive an experimental RNA vaccine , whose effects include auto-immune reactions ; the body basically attacks itself .
[ 3 ] And doctors advising the CDC are telling us not to be alarmed .
The deaths are just routine .
Lots and lots of doctors who know what ’ s going on are thinking , “ What if all this comes back on ME ?
” Fjackets Brown Leather ... Buy New $ 167.00 Well , it IS coming back on you , Doctors .
You ’ re killers in white coats who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Best of Jon Rappoport

CNN has the story. And it’s quite a story: “Why vaccinate our most frail? Odd vote out shows the dilemma”, December 4. [1]
“The vote to recommend long-term care residents be among the first to receive Covid-19 vaccinations was not unanimous.”
“Out of a panel of 14 CDC vaccine advisers, a lone doctor said no.”
“’Odd woman out, I guess,’ Dr. Helen ‘Keipp’ Talbot, of Vanderbilt University, told her colleagues. ‘I still struggle with this. This was not an easy vote’.”
“Talbot was worried about whether the vaccine would even work in such frail, vulnerable patients. Even more, she worried about how it might look if the vaccine failed in that group, or how it would affect public perception if residents died soon after getting the vaccine.” Decrum Brown Leather J... Buy New $169.00 (as of 06:54 UTC - Details)
“The Covid-19 vaccines have not been tested in the frail elderly, many of whom are residents of long-term care facilities.”
Let’s stop here for a moment. First, we learn that the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine have not used the frail and elderly as volunteers. Therefore, there is NO evidence that the vaccine is safe or effective in that very large group. If this doesn’t give the frail and elderly and their families pause for thought, nothing will.
Second, Dr. Talbot is worried about “public perception,” when the elderly die right after getting the vaccination.
Well, what would YOU think if your mother died the day after she received the COVID shot?
The CNN article gets worse. Read on. Next up is a comment from Dr. Kelly Moore, “associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition, which is supporting frontline workers who will administer Covid-19 vaccinations.”
“’Since they [the COVID vaccines] haven’t been studied in people in those [elderly] populations, we don’t know how well the vaccine will work for them. We know that most vaccines don’t work nearly as well in a frail elderly person as they would in someone who is fit and vigorous, even if they happen to be the same age,’ Moore said.”
Again—zero evidence the COVID vaccines work in elderly and frail populations. Most vaccines don’t “work nearly as well.”
CNN: “When shots begin to go into arms of [nursing home and long-term care facility] residents, Moore said Americans need to understand that deaths may occur that won’t necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine.”
“’We would not at all be surprised to see, coincidentally, vaccination happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine, not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that’s the place where people at the end of their lives reside,’ Moore said.” Bellivera Faux Suede L... Buy New $45.99 (as of 06:54 UTC - Details)
“’One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes’.”
Right. Don’t be alarmed.
Don’t worry if people who are doing reasonably well suddenly die right after getting the COVID shot. It’s just a coincidence.
Their long-term health conditions just happened to kick in a day or two after vaccination. Nothing to wonder about.
Don’t kick up a fuss if it’s YOUR father or mother who died. Stay calm. You can be sure the doctors will let you know if your mother died from the vaccine. Of course they will.
Even though the vaccine has never been tested on the elderly and frail, the doctors know whether a death occurred from the vaccination or from other causes. And they’ll tell the truth. They always do.
The doctors quoted in this CNN article are obviously worried about people dying as a result of the vaccine. They know it’s going to happen. They’re thinking out loud about what they can do to stem the tide of public outrage—particularly from the families of those who die.
The best idea they can come up with is: “these people die anyway.”
I remind readers that, for months, I’ve been reporting on the huge percentage of all so-called COVID deaths that have been occurring among the elderly in nursing homes, in long-term care facilities, in hospitals, in their homes. [2] SID Women’s Lamb... Buy New $175.99 (as of 06:54 UTC - Details)
These people were already suffering from multiple long-term serious health conditions. On top of that, they had been treated for years with an array of toxic medical drugs.
And then, they’re absolutely terrified when they receive a diagnosis of COVID. Then they’re isolated, cut off from family and friends.
And they give up and die.
NO VIRUS IS REQUIRED TO EXPLAIN THESE DEATHS.
This is forced premature killing of old people. It’s murder by COVID diagnosis and isolation. [2]
And now, these people will receive an experimental RNA vaccine, whose effects include auto-immune reactions; the body basically attacks itself. [3]
More killing.
And doctors advising the CDC are telling us not to be alarmed.
The deaths are just routine.
Lots and lots of doctors who know what’s going on are thinking, “What if all this comes back on ME?” Fjackets Brown Leather... Buy New $167.00 (as of 06:54 UTC - Details)
Well, it IS coming back on you, Doctors.
You’re killers in white coats who are supposed to be saving lives.
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs-extreme-allergy-sufferers-regulators-reaction
[2] https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/
[3] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/26/vaccine-for-the-china-virus-the-planet-is-the-guinea-pig-for-a-vast-experiment/
Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
The Best of Jon Rappoport