lewrockwell--2020-03-03--Can the Fed Save Us From Climate Change?

The 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Act requires the Federal Reserve to “ promote ” stable prices and full employment .
Of course , the Fed ’ s steady erosion of the dollar ’ s purchasing power has made prices anything but stable , while the boom-and-bust cycle created by the Fed ensures that periods of low unemployment will not last for long .
Despite the difficulties the Fed faces fulfilling its “ dual mandate , ” Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently announced a new Fed mandate : to protect the financial system from being destabilized by climate change .
Powell appears @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ the science is settled ” regarding the existence , causes , and effects of climate change .
But the statement “ the science is settled ” is itself unscientific .
Science is rarely settled as today ’ s new discoveries disprove yesterday ’ s consensus .
In the case of climate change , many scientists dispute the claim that absent massive expansion of government power a climate apocalypse will soon be at hand .
So far , the Fed ’ s actions regarding climate change include holding a conference and Chairman Powell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Network for Greening the Financial System .
This network is composed in part of central banks from around the world that are attempting to work together to assess the risks of , and plan possible responses to , climate change .
End The Fed Ron Paul Best Price : $ 2.18 Buy New $ 5.68 While Powell has not given details regarding other actions the Fed might take to protect the financial system from climate change , there are a number of actions that the Fed could take .
For starters , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be willing to increase its purchase of government debt if Congress passes Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ’ s Green New Deal .
The Fed , since its creation , has been monetizing federal debt , and thus enabling the growth of the welfare-warfare state .
The Fed could implement “ Green Quantitative Easing ” by purchasing bonds of green energy and other companies whose products fit the environmentalist agenda .
The Fed could also use its monetary and regulatory authority to “ encourage ” financial institutions to support “ environmentally-friendly ” businesses .
Whatever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ financial system from climate change , the result will be further erosion of the dollar ’ s purchasing power , increased government control over the economy , lower economic growth , increased crony capitalism , and a reduction in liberty and prosperity .
Ironically , the Fed ’ s plans to address climate change will harm the environment .
History shows that the most effective way to protect the environment is via a system of private property rights and free markets .
Private property owners are better stewards of the environment than are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ greater incentives to maintain the value of their property .
This is why the greatest pollution in history was in the communist countries of the 20th century .
The Fed ’ s failure to provide any details on how it will carry out its self-imposed climate change mandate is another reason why Congress must rein in the secretive , rogue central bank .
A step in restoring a monetary policy that truly promotes prosperity is to pass the Audit the Fed bill so Congress and the people can at last learn the full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Act requires the Federal Reserve to “ promote ” stable prices and full employment .
Of course , the Fed ’ s steady erosion of the dollar ’ s purchasing power has made prices anything but stable , while the boom-and-bust cycle created by the Fed ensures that periods of low unemployment will not last for long .
Despite the difficulties the Fed faces fulfilling its “ dual mandate , ” Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently announced a new Fed mandate : to protect the financial system from being destabilized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have bought into the propaganda that “ the science is settled ” regarding the existence , causes , and effects of climate change .
But the statement “ the science is settled ” is itself unscientific .
Science is rarely settled as today ’ s new discoveries disprove yesterday ’ s consensus .
In the case of climate change , many scientists dispute the claim that absent massive expansion of government power a climate apocalypse will soon be at hand .
So far , the Fed ’ s actions regarding climate change include @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Fed is likely to join the Network for Greening the Financial System .
This network is composed in part of central banks from around the world that are attempting to work together to assess the risks of , and plan possible responses to , climate change .
Swords Into Plowshares ... Ron Paul Best Price : $ 2.70 Buy New $ 9.27 While Powell has not given details regarding other actions the Fed might take to protect the financial system from climate change , there are a number of actions that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Powell could signal that the Fed would be willing to increase its purchase of government debt if Congress passes Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ’ s Green New Deal .
The Fed , since its creation , has been monetizing federal debt , and thus enabling the growth of the welfare-warfare state .
The Fed could implement “ Green Quantitative Easing ” by purchasing bonds of green energy and other companies whose products fit the environmentalist agenda .
The Fed could also use its monetary and regulatory authority to “ encourage ” financial institutions to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policies the Fed adopts to protect the financial system from climate change , the result will be further erosion of the dollar ’ s purchasing power , increased government control over the economy , lower economic growth , increased crony capitalism , and a reduction in liberty and prosperity .
Ironically , the Fed ’ s plans to address climate change will harm the environment .
History shows that the most effective way to protect the environment is via a system of private property rights and free markets .
Private property owners are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government bureaucrats because private property owners have greater incentives to maintain the value of their property .
This is why the greatest pollution in history was in the communist countries of the 20th century .
The Fed ’ s failure to provide any details on how it will carry out its self-imposed climate change mandate is another reason why Congress must rein in the secretive , rogue central bank .
A step in restoring a monetary policy that truly promotes prosperity is to pass the Audit the Fed bill so Congress and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth about the Federal Reserve .
The Best of Ron Paul

The 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Act requires the Federal Reserve to “promote” stable prices and full employment. Of course, the Fed’s steady erosion of the dollar’s purchasing power has made prices anything but stable, while the boom-and-bust cycle created by the Fed ensures that periods of low unemployment will not last for long. Despite the difficulties the Fed faces fulfilling its “dual mandate,” Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently announced a new Fed mandate: to protect the financial system from being destabilized by climate change.
Powell appears to have bought into the propaganda that “the science is settled” regarding the existence, causes, and effects of climate change. But the statement “the science is settled” is itself unscientific. Science is rarely settled as today’s new discoveries disprove yesterday’s consensus. In the case of climate change, many scientists dispute the claim that absent massive expansion of government power a climate apocalypse will soon be at hand.
So far, the Fed’s actions regarding climate change include holding a conference and Chairman Powell indicating the Fed is likely to join the Network for Greening the Financial System. This network is composed in part of central banks from around the world that are attempting to work together to assess the risks of, and plan possible responses to, climate change.
End The Fed Ron Paul Best Price: $2.18 Buy New $5.68 (as of 09:55 UTC - Details) While Powell has not given details regarding other actions the Fed might take to protect the financial system from climate change, there are a number of actions that the Fed could take. For starters, Powell could signal that the Fed would be willing to increase its purchase of government debt if Congress passes Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal. The Fed, since its creation, has been monetizing federal debt, and thus enabling the growth of the welfare-warfare state.
The Fed could implement “Green Quantitative Easing” by purchasing bonds of green energy and other companies whose products fit the environmentalist agenda. The Fed could also use its monetary and regulatory authority to “encourage” financial institutions to support “environmentally-friendly” businesses.
Whatever policies the Fed adopts to protect the financial system from climate change, the result will be further erosion of the dollar’s purchasing power, increased government control over the economy, lower economic growth, increased crony capitalism, and a reduction in liberty and prosperity.
Ironically, the Fed’s plans to address climate change will harm the environment. History shows that the most effective way to protect the environment is via a system of private property rights and free markets. Private property owners are better stewards of the environment than are government bureaucrats because private property owners have greater incentives to maintain the value of their property. This is why the greatest pollution in history was in the communist countries of the 20th century.
The Fed’s failure to provide any details on how it will carry out its self-imposed climate change mandate is another reason why Congress must rein in the secretive, rogue central bank. A step in restoring a monetary policy that truly promotes prosperity is to pass the Audit the Fed bill so Congress and the people can at last learn the full truth about the Federal Reserve.
The 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins Act requires the Federal Reserve to “promote” stable prices and full employment. Of course, the Fed’s steady erosion of the dollar’s purchasing power has made prices anything but stable, while the boom-and-bust cycle created by the Fed ensures that periods of low unemployment will not last for long. Despite the difficulties the Fed faces fulfilling its “dual mandate,” Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently announced a new Fed mandate: to protect the financial system from being destabilized by climate change.
Powell appears to have bought into the propaganda that “the science is settled” regarding the existence, causes, and effects of climate change. But the statement “the science is settled” is itself unscientific. Science is rarely settled as today’s new discoveries disprove yesterday’s consensus. In the case of climate change, many scientists dispute the claim that absent massive expansion of government power a climate apocalypse will soon be at hand.
So far, the Fed’s actions regarding climate change include holding a conference and Chairman Powell indicating the Fed is likely to join the Network for Greening the Financial System. This network is composed in part of central banks from around the world that are attempting to work together to assess the risks of, and plan possible responses to, climate change.
Swords Into Plowshares... Paul, Ron Best Price: $4.00 Buy New $15.99 (as of 11:36 UTC - Details) While Powell has not given details regarding other actions the Fed might take to protect the financial system from climate change, there are a number of actions that the Fed could take. For starters, Powell could signal that the Fed would be willing to increase its purchase of government debt if Congress passes Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal. The Fed, since its creation, has been monetizing federal debt, and thus enabling the growth of the welfare-warfare state.
The Fed could implement “Green Quantitative Easing” by purchasing bonds of green energy and other companies whose products fit the environmentalist agenda. The Fed could also use its monetary and regulatory authority to “encourage” financial institutions to support “environmentally-friendly” businesses.
Whatever policies the Fed adopts to protect the financial system from climate change, the result will be further erosion of the dollar’s purchasing power, increased government control over the economy, lower economic growth, increased crony capitalism, and a reduction in liberty and prosperity.
Ironically, the Fed’s plans to address climate change will harm the environment. History shows that the most effective way to protect the environment is via a system of private property rights and free markets. Private property owners are better stewards of the environment than are government bureaucrats because private property owners have greater incentives to maintain the value of their property. This is why the greatest pollution in history was in the communist countries of the 20th century.
The Fed’s failure to provide any details on how it will carry out its self-imposed climate change mandate is another reason why Congress must rein in the secretive, rogue central bank. A step in restoring a monetary policy that truly promotes prosperity is to pass the Audit the Fed bill so Congress and the people can at last learn the full truth about the Federal Reserve.
The Best of Ron Paul, MD


Korea Reunified?

The image above is of the Arch of Reunification in North Korea , located just south of Pyongyang .
It was constructed in 2001 and features two women wearing traditional chosŏn-ot dresses , representing the two Koreas coming together .
The arch spans the highway that connects North and South Korea , except that , as can be seen… there are no vehicles on that highway .
So , why build a highway that doesn ’ t have a use ?
Well , since the time of Kim Il Sung , there have been discussions to reunify the two Koreas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be two immediate questions : “ Why do they want to reunify ?
” And , “ What ’ s stopping them ?
” To answer the first question , it ’ s an ideal opportunity , as each has something to offer the other .
Left of Bang : How the ... Patrick Van Horne , Jas ... Best Price : $ 12.13 Buy New $ 14.63 Westerners will know that the South is a highly modernised nation with a rapidly growing manufacturing capability .
It has all the necessary expertise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Korea into a manufacturing nation .
But why would the Kim dynasty desire this ?
Don ’ t they have all they need ?
They have total dictatorship over a very subservient population .
What ’ s to gain ?
Well , the last two generations of Kim leaders have been North Korean .
But Kim Jong-un was educated in Switzerland .
In spite of his Maoist outfits and haircut , in many regards , Mister Kim is decidedly European .
Certainly , he enjoys many luxuries that are western .
But beyond @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Residence , there are only minefields and military stations .
Beyond that , there ’ s mostly agrarian poverty .
Reunification with the South would provide the Kim family not only with dramatically increased wealth but make them a more powerful force in northern Asia .
As for South Korea , the benefit to reunification is , if anything , more desirable .
For decades , South Korea has been expanding its manufacturing capacity , and the thirty-year Japanese economic quagmire has allowed South Koreans to rise up dramatically against their traditional arch-rival @ @ @ @ @ @ @ All of the goods manufactured in South Korea must be loaded into shipping containers , placed on freighters and shipped around the world .
The South Korean dream would be that , if they could lower their shipping costs through rail shipment , everything they sold would drop in price and they ’ d be in for the greatest boom of prosperity they ’ d ever seen .
If they could only cross the border into North Korea with freight trains , it would open up new opportunities to ship to Asia and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the second question : “ What ’ s stopping them ?
” Well , as much as Mister Kim may desire the increased wealth , he has the same problem that plagued East Germany prior to the German reunification : If the borders opened , millions of poor nongmin – peasants – would flood south , in search of immediate improvements in their living condition .
Mister Kim , understandably , wants them to remain under his personal thumb .
To many in the West , this translates into , “ It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s another possibility that ’ s not being discussed in the West .
Here in Korea , it ’ s a very real possibility .
This is not exactly a topic that you ’ d hear in Korean coffee shops each morning , but it ’ s one that business leaders here are discussing quietly : The reunification can be done in stages .
For the sake of the older Korean people , who wish to reunite with their families , the official goal would be full reunification , tentatively slated for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Koreas could , in the meantime , institute a trade agreement in which North Korea gains access to South Korean investment capital , expertise and infrastructure , and the South gains a railway and a highway through North Korea to the rest of Asia .
And it ’ s at this point that the image above becomes significant .
Although , at present , we can stand in the middle of this highway leading from Pyongyang to the Demilitarised Zone ( DMZ ) , seeing only the occasional vehicle , it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purpose .
It just hasn ’ t yet been used .
Also at the DMZ , the fences , guards and even the little aqua-painted buildings that Westerners have seen in videos of Mister Kim and President Trump on their historic border meeting are indeed still in place .
But what ’ s not often seen is the Dorasan railway station .
It ’ s a large , modern railway station with all the kiosks , ticket booths and schedule boards in place , but has been all but unused since its completion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ This is not the last station from the South , but the first station toward the North.
” Much of the DMZ is still a minefield , where most of the two million mines placed there in the 1950s are still present .
However , beyond the minefields , we can see development .
Some of this development is residential and office buildings , but quite a bit of it is in pre-engineered steel buildings , ideal for manufacture and storage .
This is occurring on both sides , although the South @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Political Class Dismis ... Mr. James Ostrowski Best Price : $ 2.00 Buy New $ 10.00 It ’ s entirely possible that the two Koreas could agree to reunify , but to retain autonomous governments in Pyongyang and Seoul .
But the immediate opportunity exists for a simple trade agreement , with migration controls .
This could happen far more quickly , within the near future .
Here , on the ground in Korea , it ’ s quite clear that a significant amount of capital is being spent toward this eventuality .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ West , is this really of any importance ?
Might he not be justified in simply saying , “ So what ?
Why do I care ?
” Well , it ’ s been said that the 21st century will be the Asian century .
Westerners are certainly aware of the present struggle between the US and China , but regardless of sanctions on China , Asia as a whole is advancing dramatically .
Even if China were to shut down entirely as a supplier of goods to the world , the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ volume of goods in as little as five years .
Here in Asia , that is manifestly evident , and indeed , it ’ s something that the people of Asia take as a given .
This is indeed an eventuality that every Westerner should understand , as it will dramatically affect his economic future .

The image above is of the Arch of Reunification in North Korea, located just south of Pyongyang. It was constructed in 2001 and features two women wearing traditional chosŏn-ot dresses, representing the two Koreas coming together.
The arch spans the highway that connects North and South Korea, except that, as can be seen… there are no vehicles on that highway.
So, why build a highway that doesn’t have a use?
Well, since the time of Kim Il Sung, there have been discussions to reunify the two Koreas.
To the Western mind, there would be two immediate questions: “Why do they want to reunify?” And, “What’s stopping them?”
To answer the first question, it’s an ideal opportunity, as each has something to offer the other. Left of Bang: How the ... Patrick Van Horne, Jas... Best Price: $12.13 Buy New $14.63 (as of 08:15 UTC - Details)
Westerners will know that the South is a highly modernised nation with a rapidly growing manufacturing capability. It has all the necessary expertise and infrastructure in place to convert North Korea into a manufacturing nation.
But why would the Kim dynasty desire this? Don’t they have all they need? They have total dictatorship over a very subservient population. What’s to gain?
Well, the last two generations of Kim leaders have been North Korean. But Kim Jong-un was educated in Switzerland. In spite of his Maoist outfits and haircut, in many regards, Mister Kim is decidedly European. Certainly, he enjoys many luxuries that are western.
But beyond the walls and fences of his Ryongsong Residence, there are only minefields and military stations. Beyond that, there’s mostly agrarian poverty.
Reunification with the South would provide the Kim family not only with dramatically increased wealth but make them a more powerful force in northern Asia.
As for South Korea, the benefit to reunification is, if anything, more desirable.
For decades, South Korea has been expanding its manufacturing capacity, and the thirty-year Japanese economic quagmire has allowed South Koreans to rise up dramatically against their traditional arch-rival.
But they have a problem. All of the goods manufactured in South Korea must be loaded into shipping containers, placed on freighters and shipped around the world. The South Korean dream would be that, if they could lower their shipping costs through rail shipment, everything they sold would drop in price and they’d be in for the greatest boom of prosperity they’d ever seen.
If they could only cross the border into North Korea with freight trains, it would open up new opportunities to ship to Asia and Europe.
And that leads us to the second question: “What’s stopping them?”
Well, as much as Mister Kim may desire the increased wealth, he has the same problem that plagued East Germany prior to the German reunification: If the borders opened, millions of poor nongmin – peasants – would flood south, in search of immediate improvements in their living condition. Mister Kim, understandably, wants them to remain under his personal thumb.
To many in the West, this translates into, “It’ll never happen,” but there’s another possibility that’s not being discussed in the West. Here in Korea, it’s a very real possibility.
This is not exactly a topic that you’d hear in Korean coffee shops each morning, but it’s one that business leaders here are discussing quietly: The reunification can be done in stages.
For the sake of the older Korean people, who wish to reunite with their families, the official goal would be full reunification, tentatively slated for a distant 2045.
But the two Koreas could, in the meantime, institute a trade agreement in which North Korea gains access to South Korean investment capital, expertise and infrastructure, and the South gains a railway and a highway through North Korea to the rest of Asia.
And it’s at this point that the image above becomes significant. Although, at present, we can stand in the middle of this highway leading from Pyongyang to the Demilitarised Zone (DMZ), seeing only the occasional vehicle, it’s clear that this highway does have a purpose. It just hasn’t yet been used.
Also at the DMZ, the fences, guards and even the little aqua-painted buildings that Westerners have seen in videos of Mister Kim and President Trump on their historic border meeting are indeed still in place.
But what’s not often seen is the Dorasan railway station. It’s a large, modern railway station with all the kiosks, ticket booths and schedule boards in place, but has been all but unused since its completion in 2014.
A sign reads, “This is not the last station from the South, but the first station toward the North.”
Much of the DMZ is still a minefield, where most of the two million mines placed there in the 1950s are still present.
However, beyond the minefields, we can see development. Some of this development is residential and office buildings, but quite a bit of it is in pre-engineered steel buildings, ideal for manufacture and storage.
This is occurring on both sides, although the South have been more industrious to date. Political Class Dismis... Ostrowski, Mr. James Best Price: $4.00 Buy New $9.50 (as of 09:20 UTC - Details)
It’s entirely possible that the two Koreas could agree to reunify, but to retain autonomous governments in Pyongyang and Seoul.
But the immediate opportunity exists for a simple trade agreement, with migration controls. This could happen far more quickly, within the near future.
Here, on the ground in Korea, it’s quite clear that a significant amount of capital is being spent toward this eventuality.
But for the armchair observer in the West, is this really of any importance? Might he not be justified in simply saying, “So what? Why do I care?”
Well, it’s been said that the 21st century will be the Asian century. Westerners are certainly aware of the present struggle between the US and China, but regardless of sanctions on China, Asia as a whole is advancing dramatically. Even if China were to shut down entirely as a supplier of goods to the world, the other Asian manufacturing companies would have replaced the volume of goods in as little as five years.
Here in Asia, that is manifestly evident, and indeed, it’s something that the people of Asia take as a given.
This is indeed an eventuality that every Westerner should understand, as it will dramatically affect his economic future.
Reprinted with permission from International Man.


lewrockwell--2020-03-03--The Elon Exemption Passes

The Elon Exemption Passes

Colorado just passed a new law specially designed to advantage Elon Musk , Rivian and anyone else “ selling ” electric cars .
They will be permitted to “ sell ” them directly to “ buyers ” ( in air quotes for the same reason you ’ d put DMV “ customer ” in air quotes ) but everyone else will be forbidden to do so .
Thus , Elon et al will not have to spend money on physical dealerships and the staff and so on ( or pay the property taxes ) that everyone else is required by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re allowed to make any money selling cars – which they actually do , in spite of all the hobbles placed in their path .
EVs , of course , only “ sell ” because they ’ re given away – using other people ’ s money to “ buy ” them .
Without all of that other-people ’ s-money , they wouldn ’ t .
This ugly fact is of course unmentionable for the same reason we ’ re not supposed to talk about women firemen ( sic ) not being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man out of a burning building but are hired on the pretense that they are able to do it .
Amazon.com Gift Card i ... Buy New $ 10.00 One wonders whatever happened to the idea of equal protection of the laws .
This being a pretty egregious example of its opposite .
Colorado could have abolished the law requiring new cars – electric and otherwise – to be sold through dealerships .
It ’ s an obnoxious law , designed by crony capitalists colluding to make new cars more expensive by preventing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , thereby eliminating the middleman .
And to eliminate the competitive price haggling which would benefit car buyers , if they had the option to buy a car at a full-service dealer or buy it direct from the manufacturer .
The Best of Eric Peters

Colorado just passed a new law specially designed to advantage Elon Musk, Rivian and anyone else “selling” electric cars. They will be permitted to “sell” them directly to “buyers” (in air quotes for the same reason you’d put DMV “customer” in air quotes) but everyone else will be forbidden to do so.
Thus, Elon et al will not have to spend money on physical dealerships and the staff and so on (or pay the property taxes) that everyone else is required by law to spend money on before they’re allowed to make any money selling cars – which they actually do, in spite of all the hobbles placed in their path.
EVs, of course, only “sell” because they’re given away – using other people’s money to “buy” them. Without all of that other-people’s-money, they wouldn’t. This ugly fact is of course unmentionable for the same reason we’re not supposed to talk about women firemen (sic) not being strong enough to carry a 200 pound man out of a burning building but are hired on the pretense that they are able to do it. Amazon.com Gift Card i... Buy New $10.00 (as of 08:25 UTC - Details)
One wonders whatever happened to the idea of equal protection of the laws. This being a pretty egregious example of its opposite.
Colorado could have abolished the law requiring new cars – electric and otherwise – to be sold through dealerships. It’s an obnoxious law, designed by crony capitalists colluding to make new cars more expensive by preventing customers from buying directly from the manufacturer, thereby eliminating the middleman.
And to eliminate the competitive price haggling which would benefit car buyers, if they had the option to buy a car at a full-service dealer or buy it direct from the manufacturer.
Read the Whole Article
The Best of Eric Peters


lewrockwell--2020-03-03--Male-Born Athletes Do Not Belong in Women’s Sports

Laurel Hubbard , a weightlifter from New Zealand , is attempting to qualify for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics .
Hubbard @ @ @ @ @ the 2019 Pacific Games in Samoa , and will try to qualify for the Olympics @ @ @ @ @ April .
The only problem here is that Hubbard was born male , but competes @ @ @ @ @ .
Laurel competed as Gavin Hubbard prior to transitioning seven years ago .
Male-to-female trans @ @ @ @ @ compete in the Olympics since 2016 , provided they meet certain testosterone levels .
But @ @ @ @ @ of being born male .
Amazon.com Gift Card i ... Buy New $ 10.00 Amazon.com @ @ @ @ @ Price : null Buy New $ 15.00 Amazon.com Gift Card i ... Best Price : @ @ @ @ @ Amazon.com Gift Card i ...
Check Amazon for Pricing .

Laurel Hubbard, a weightlifter from New Zealand, is attempting to qualify for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. Hubbard won two gold medals at the 2019 Pacific Games in Samoa, and will try to qualify for the Olympics at the Oceania Championships in April.
The only problem here is that Hubbard was born male, but competes in women’s categories. Laurel competed as Gavin Hubbard prior to transitioning seven years ago.
This is insane. Women’s rights to basic fairness & equality are getting destroyed at the altar of political correctness. https://t.co/XnlGNmdVV4 — Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) February 26, 2020
Male-to-female trans athletes have been allowed to compete in the Olympics since 2016, provided they meet certain testosterone levels. But this ignores the in-built advantages of being born male.
Read the Whole Article
Amazon.com Gift Card i... Buy New $10.00 (as of 08:25 UTC - Details) Amazon.com Gift Card i... Buy New $15.00 (as of 12:45 UTC - Details) Amazon.com Gift Card i... Buy New $25.00 (as of 11:14 UTC - Details) Amazon.com Gift Card i... Check Amazon for Pricing.


lewrockwell--2020-03-03--Humanity Is Making a Very Important Decision When It Comes to Assange

The propagandists have all gone dead silent on the WikiLeaks founder they previously were smearing with relentless viciousness , because they no longer have an argument .
The facts are all in , and yes , it turns out the US government is certainly and undeniably working to exploit legal loopholes to imprison a journalist for exposing its war crimes .
That is happening , and there is no justifying it .
So the narrative managers , by and large , have gone silent .
Which is good .
Because it gives us an opening to seize control of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go on the offensive with this .
Assange supporters have gotten so used to playing defense that it hasn ’ t fully occurred to us to go on a full-blown charge .
I ’ ve been guilty of this as well ; I ’ ll be letting myself get bogged down in some old , obsolete debate with someone about some obscure aspect of the Swedish case or something , not realizing that none of that matters anymore .
All the narrative manipulations that were used to get Assange to this point are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the fact that we now have undeniable evidence that the US government is working to set a precedent which will allow it to jail any journalist who exposes its misdeeds , and we can now force Assange ’ s smearers to confront this reality .
“ Should journalists be jailed for exposing US war crimes ?
Yes or no ?
” When Google Met WikiLeaks Assange , Julian Best Price : $ 4.99 Buy New $ 1.99 That ’ s the debate now .
Not Russia .
Not Sweden .
Not whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his dishes at the embassy .
That ’ s old stuff .
That ’ s obsolete .
That ’ s playing defense .
Now we play offense : “ Should journalists be jailed for exposing US war crimes ?
Yes or no ?
” Demand an answer .
Call attention to them and demand that they answer .
Dig them out of their hidey holes and make them answer this .
Drag them out into the light and make them answer this question in front of everyone .
Because that is all this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get sidetracked .
Don ’ t get tricked into debating defensively .
Force the issue : the US government is trying to establish and normalize the practice of extraditing and imprisoning journalists for exposing its misdeeds .
That is the issue to focus on .
You will find that anyone who dares to stick their head above the parapet and smear Assange now gets very , very squirmy if you pin them down and force them to address this issue .
Because they can not answer without admitting that they are wrong .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ this entire time .
It ’ s a completely unassailable argument .
We now have two and a half months to prepare for the second half of Julian Assange ’ s extradition hearing : all of March , all of April , and half of May .
We ’ re going to need all that time to seize control of the narrative and make it very , very clear to the world that a very important decision is about to be made by the powerful on our behalf , if we don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This really is do or die time , humans .
If we allow them to extradite and imprison Julian Assange for practicing journalism , that ’ s it .
It ’ s over .
We might as well all stop caring what happens to the world and sit on our hands while the oligarchs drive us to ecological disaster , nuclear annihilation or authoritarian dystopia .
It ’ s impossible to hold power accountable if you ’ re not even allowed to see what it ’ s doing .
If we , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spine to stand up against the few and say “ No , we get to find out facts about you bastards and use it to inform our worldview , you don ’ t get to criminalize that , ” then we certainly won ’ t have the spine it will take to wrest control of this world away from the hands of sociopathic plutocrats and take our fate into our own hands .
We are deciding , right now , what we are made of .
And what we want to become .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ part of the movie where we collectively choose the red pill or the blue pill .
We are collectively being asked a question here , and our answer to that question will determine the entire course we will take as a species .
So what ’ s it going to be , humanity ?
A world where we can hold power to account with the light of truth , or a world where power decides what ’ s true for us ?
A world with free speech and a free press , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they expose the evils of the most powerful institutions on this planet ?
Cypherpunks : Freedom a ... Julian Assange Best Price : $ 3.45 Buy New $ 8.99 A world where we all actively fight to free Assange and get the job done , or a giant , irreversible leap toward the end of humanity as we know it ?
Or do we sit complacent with our Netflix and our KFC and trust the authority figures to do what ’ s best ?
Do we take the red pill ?
Or do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for reading !
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website , which will get you an email notification for everything I publish .
My work is entirely reader-supported , so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around , liking me on Facebook , following my antics on Twitter , checking out my podcast on either Youtube , soundcloud , Apple podcasts or Spotify , following me on Steemit , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Patreon or Paypal , purchasing some of my sweet merchandise , buying my books Rogue Nation : Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke : A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers .
For more info on who I am , where I stand , and what I ’ m trying to do with this platform , click here .
Everyone , racist platforms excluded , has my permission to republish , use or translate any part of this work ( or anything else I ’ ve written ) in any way they like @ @ @ @

The propagandists have all gone dead silent on the WikiLeaks founder they previously were smearing with relentless viciousness, because they no longer have an argument. The facts are all in, and yes, it turns out the US government is certainly and undeniably working to exploit legal loopholes to imprison a journalist for exposing its war crimes. That is happening, and there is no justifying it.
So the narrative managers, by and large, have gone silent.
Which is good. Because it gives us an opening to seize control of the narrative.
It’s time to go on the offensive with this. Assange supporters have gotten so used to playing defense that it hasn’t fully occurred to us to go on a full-blown charge. I’ve been guilty of this as well; I’ll be letting myself get bogged down in some old, obsolete debate with someone about some obscure aspect of the Swedish case or something, not realizing that none of that matters anymore. All the narrative manipulations that were used to get Assange to this point are impotent, irrelevant expenditures of energy compared to the fact that we now have undeniable evidence that the US government is working to set a precedent which will allow it to jail any journalist who exposes its misdeeds, and we can now force Assange’s smearers to confront this reality.
“Should journalists be jailed for exposing US war crimes? Yes or no?” When Google Met WikiLeaks Assange, Julian Best Price: $4.99 Buy New $1.99 (as of 01:25 UTC - Details)
That’s the debate now. Not Russia. Not Sweden. Not whether he followed proper bail protocol or washed his dishes at the embassy. That’s old stuff. That’s obsolete. That’s playing defense.
Now we play offense: “Should journalists be jailed for exposing US war crimes? Yes or no?”
Demand an answer. Call attention to them and demand that they answer. Dig them out of their hidey holes and make them answer this. Drag them out into the light and make them answer this question in front of everyone. Because that is all this is about now.
Don’t get sidetracked. Don’t get tricked into debating defensively. Force the issue: the US government is trying to establish and normalize the practice of extraditing and imprisoning journalists for exposing its misdeeds. That is the issue to focus on.
You will find that anyone who dares to stick their head above the parapet and smear Assange now gets very, very squirmy if you pin them down and force them to address this issue. Because they cannot answer without admitting that they are wrong. And that they’ve been wrong this entire time. It’s a completely unassailable argument.
We now have two and a half months to prepare for the second half of Julian Assange’s extradition hearing: all of March, all of April, and half of May. We’re going to need all that time to seize control of the narrative and make it very, very clear to the world that a very important decision is about to be made by the powerful on our behalf, if we don’t make that decision for them.
This really is do or die time, humans. If we allow them to extradite and imprison Julian Assange for practicing journalism, that’s it. It’s over. We might as well all stop caring what happens to the world and sit on our hands while the oligarchs drive us to ecological disaster, nuclear annihilation or authoritarian dystopia. It’s impossible to hold power accountable if you’re not even allowed to see what it’s doing.
If we, the many, don’t have the spine to stand up against the few and say “No, we get to find out facts about you bastards and use it to inform our worldview, you don’t get to criminalize that,” then we certainly won’t have the spine it will take to wrest control of this world away from the hands of sociopathic plutocrats and take our fate into our own hands. We are deciding, right now, what we are made of. And what we want to become.
This is it. This is the part of the movie where we collectively choose the red pill or the blue pill. We are collectively being asked a question here, and our answer to that question will determine the entire course we will take as a species.
So what’s it going to be, humanity?
Truth, or lies?
Light, or darkness?
A world where we can hold power to account with the light of truth, or a world where power decides what’s true for us?
A world with free speech and a free press, or a world where journalists are imprisoned whenever they expose the evils of the most powerful institutions on this planet? Cypherpunks: Freedom a... Julian Assange Best Price: $3.45 Buy New $8.99 (as of 08:30 UTC - Details)
A world where we all actively fight to free Assange and get the job done, or a giant, irreversible leap toward the end of humanity as we know it?
Do we free Assange?
Or do we sit complacent with our Netflix and our KFC and trust the authority figures to do what’s best?
Do we take the red pill?
Or do we take the blue one?
Choose your path, humans.
Choose wisely.
____________________________
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast on either Youtube, soundcloud, Apple podcasts or Spotify, following me on Steemit, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my sweet merchandise, buying my books Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone and Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2


lewrockwell--2020-03-03--Joe Biden Inadvertently Schools Conservatives and Libertarians on Tax Deductions

Like the other Democratic presidential candidates , former senator and vice-president Joe Biden has a tax plan—a plan to raise taxes .
To raise an additional $ 3.4 trillion government revenue over the next decade to address climate change , infrastructure , health care , and higher education , Biden has put forth ten specific proposals .
Eliminate stepped-up basis .
Appreciated assets transferred by a decedent can no longer be “ stepped up ” to fair market value at the time of death .
Raise the top rate on ordinary income .
Increase the top income tax rate from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capital gains and dividends at ordinary rates .
Increase the top capital gains and dividends tax rate from 23.8 percent to 39.6 percent .
Limit itemized deductions .
The reduction in tax liability per dollar of deductions can not exceed 28 percent .
Gun Control and the Se ... Laurence M. Vance Buy New $ 5.95 Raise the corporate tax rate .
Increase the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent .
Impose a minimum tax on corporate book income .
C corporations with more than $ 100 million in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the greater of normal corporate tax liability and 15 percent of book income .
Raise the tax rate on foreign profits .
Decrease the global intangible low-taxed income ( GILTI ) deduction thereby increasing the effective tax rate on corporate income earned by foreign affiliates from 10.5 to 21 percent .
Eliminate fossil fuel subsidies .
Eliminate certain tax credits for oil , gas , and coal production , including expensing of exploration costs and percentage depletion cost recovery rules .
Eliminate real estate loopholes .
Eliminate the ability of owners of appreciated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or business to defer capital gains taxes when exchanging the asset for property of “ like kind.
” Impose sanctions on tax havens .
Impose sanctions on countries that facilitate corporate tax avoidance .
Additionally , concerning tariffs , which are merely taxes under another name , Biden has said that some of Trump ’ s tariffs should come off , but others should go on .
Biden has also said that he supports a financial transactions tax .
And regarding the 12.4 percent Social Security payroll tax , which is currently levied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wages , Biden would also apply it to wages above $ 400,000 .
The Penn Wharton Budget Model ( PWBM ) projects that Biden ’ s tax plan would raise between $ 2.3 trillion ( including macroeconomic effects ) and $ 2.6 trillion ( not including macroeconomic effects ) over the next ten years—not the $ 3.4 trillion that the Biden presidential campaign estimates .
I suppose this can be considered a good thing .
About the only real good thing about Biden ’ s tax plan is that he is not proposing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Elizabeth Warren .
The Free Society Laurence M. Vance Best Price : $ 13.55 Buy New $ 17.54 What I want to focus on is Biden ’ s attempt to limit how much taxpayers can use deductions to reduce their tax liability .
As pointed out above , he is calling for capping the value of tax deductions for the wealthy at 28 percent .
Biden ’ s campaign claims that this would raise $ 310 billion over the next ten years .
Joe Biden understands a principle that some conservatives and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tax deductions increases taxes .
Tax deductions reduce one ’ s income subject to tax .
One will pay less in taxes the greater the number , and the greater the amount , of deductions that he qualifies for .
Eliminating or reducing the value of tax deductions has the same effect as raising tax rates : less money in the pockets of Americans and more money in the pockets of greedy , profligate Uncle Sam .
Any support for eliminating or reducing tax deductions should be seen as a call to raise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ libertarians whining about how much “ complexity ” deductions add to the tax code , how much deductions “ distort ” the tax code , how much deductions “ subsidize ” high-income taxpayers , and how much deductions encourage people to make “ economically unwise decisions.
” All tax deductions are good ; it doesn ’ t matter whom they benefit or why Congress enacts them .
Tax deductions—and their cousins tax exemptions , tax breaks , tax loopholes , tax shelters , tax incentives , and tax credits ( as long as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subsidies that have to be paid for .
Since there is no chance that the income tax will be eliminated or the tax rates substantially reduced , the importance of tax deductions can not be overstated .
As long as Americans have an income tax , the more deductions they can take to lower their tax liability the better .
The Best of Laurence M. Vance

Like the other Democratic presidential candidates, former senator and vice-president Joe Biden has a tax plan—a plan to raise taxes.
To raise an additional $3.4 trillion government revenue over the next decade to address climate change, infrastructure, health care, and higher education, Biden has put forth ten specific proposals.
Eliminate stepped-up basis. Appreciated assets transferred by a decedent can no longer be “stepped up” to fair market value at the time of death.
Raise the top rate on ordinary income. Increase the top income tax rate from 37 percent to 39.6 percent.
Tax capital gains and dividends at ordinary rates. Increase the top capital gains and dividends tax rate from 23.8 percent to 39.6 percent.
Limit itemized deductions. The reduction in tax liability per dollar of deductions cannot exceed 28 percent. Gun Control and the Se... Laurence M. Vance Buy New $5.95 (as of 11:36 UTC - Details)
Raise the corporate tax rate. Increase the corporate income tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent.
Impose a minimum tax on corporate book income. C corporations with more than $100 million in book income would be required to pay the greater of normal corporate tax liability and 15 percent of book income.
Raise the tax rate on foreign profits. Decrease the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) deduction thereby increasing the effective tax rate on corporate income earned by foreign affiliates from 10.5 to 21 percent.
Eliminate fossil fuel subsidies. Eliminate certain tax credits for oil, gas, and coal production, including expensing of exploration costs and percentage depletion cost recovery rules.
Eliminate real estate loopholes. Eliminate the ability of owners of appreciated real estate assets used in a trade or business to defer capital gains taxes when exchanging the asset for property of “like kind.”
Impose sanctions on tax havens. Impose sanctions on countries that facilitate corporate tax avoidance.
Additionally, concerning tariffs, which are merely taxes under another name, Biden has said that some of Trump’s tariffs should come off, but others should go on. Biden has also said that he supports a financial transactions tax. And regarding the 12.4 percent Social Security payroll tax, which is currently levied on the first $137,700 of employee wages, Biden would also apply it to wages above $400,000.
The Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) projects that Biden’s tax plan would raise between $2.3 trillion (including macroeconomic effects) and $2.6 trillion (not including macroeconomic effects) over the next ten years—not the $3.4 trillion that the Biden presidential campaign estimates. I suppose this can be considered a good thing.
About the only real good thing about Biden’s tax plan is that he is not proposing a wealth tax like Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.
The Free Society Laurence M. Vance Best Price: $13.55 Buy New $17.54 (as of 04:55 UTC - Details) What I want to focus on is Biden’s attempt to limit how much taxpayers can use deductions to reduce their tax liability. As pointed out above, he is calling for capping the value of tax deductions for the wealthy at 28 percent. Biden’s campaign claims that this would raise $310 billion over the next ten years.
Joe Biden understands a principle that some conservatives and libertarians have yet to grasp: decreasing tax deductions increases taxes.
Tax deductions reduce one’s income subject to tax. One will pay less in taxes the greater the number, and the greater the amount, of deductions that he qualifies for. Eliminating or reducing the value of tax deductions has the same effect as raising tax rates: less money in the pockets of Americans and more money in the pockets of greedy, profligate Uncle Sam. Any support for eliminating or reducing tax deductions should be seen as a call to raise taxes—even if the supporters are conservatives and libertarians whining about how much “complexity” deductions add to the tax code, how much deductions “distort” the tax code, how much deductions “subsidize” high-income taxpayers, and how much deductions encourage people to make “economically unwise decisions.” All tax deductions are good; it doesn’t matter whom they benefit or why Congress enacts them.
Tax deductions—and their cousins tax exemptions, tax breaks, tax loopholes, tax shelters, tax incentives, and tax credits (as long as they are not refundable)—are not subsidies that have to be paid for. Since there is no chance that the income tax will be eliminated or the tax rates substantially reduced, the importance of tax deductions cannot be overstated. As long as Americans have an income tax, the more deductions they can take to lower their tax liability the better.
The Best of Laurence M. Vance


lewrockwell--2020-03-03--A Return to Beauty

A Return to Beauty

The guilty flee when no man pursueth , says Proverbs , but it does not follow from this that the guilty do not flee when they are indeed pursued .
The guilty also have a tendency to argue when they know that they are in the wrong , as for example architects who continue to deny that , for the past seventy years at least , they have been disenchanting the world by espousing a dysfunctional functionalism and constructing buildings so hideous that they make Frankenstein ’ s monster look like Clark Gable .
I refuse to think so ill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe them to be totally unaware of what they have done .
Rather , I pity them .
They are like those unfortunate government spokesmen who have to defend the indefensible in public , which is always a disagreeable and nerve-racking thing to have to do .
As government spokesmen invent a language full of polysyllabic euphemism to disguise the catastrophe their masters have wrought , so architects speak a language that is either incomprehensible or , where comprehensible , entirely beside the point .
I take as an example the response of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump ’ s executive order making the classical style of architecture compulsory for new federal buildings of any size or cost in the Washington area .
I do not name the professor because my target is the guild or sect to which he belongs rather than the individual .
His article objecting to the executive order is typical of many .
Amazon.com Gift Card i ... Buy New $ 10.00 He begins with the argument from authority : He cites a number of American architectural organizations that are highly critical or fearful of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But this is like canvassing the opinion of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union , the KGB , and the Red Army to find out whether communism was as bad as it was painted .
It is precisely the nature of the architects ’ authority that is at issue .
The president ’ s executive order starts from what seems to me an indisputable premise , that much if not most of the federal building carried out in the past half century has been at best undistinguished and at worst hideous .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , federal buildings that were ( and will always be ) a great adornment to the city , such as the Supreme Court and the Jefferson Memorial , were built .
And it is not possible that what was possible then should not be possible now .
The Best of Theodore Dalrymple

The guilty flee when no man pursueth, says Proverbs, but it does not follow from this that the guilty do not flee when they are indeed pursued. The guilty also have a tendency to argue when they know that they are in the wrong, as for example architects who continue to deny that, for the past seventy years at least, they have been disenchanting the world by espousing a dysfunctional functionalism and constructing buildings so hideous that they make Frankenstein’s monster look like Clark Gable.
I refuse to think so ill of architects as human beings as to believe them to be totally unaware of what they have done. Rather, I pity them. They are like those unfortunate government spokesmen who have to defend the indefensible in public, which is always a disagreeable and nerve-racking thing to have to do. As government spokesmen invent a language full of polysyllabic euphemism to disguise the catastrophe their masters have wrought, so architects speak a language that is either incomprehensible or, where comprehensible, entirely beside the point.
I take as an example the response of a university professor of architecture to President Trump’s executive order making the classical style of architecture compulsory for new federal buildings of any size or cost in the Washington area. I do not name the professor because my target is the guild or sect to which he belongs rather than the individual. His article objecting to the executive order is typical of many. Amazon.com Gift Card i... Buy New $10.00 (as of 08:25 UTC - Details)
He begins with the argument from authority: He cites a number of American architectural organizations that are highly critical or fearful of the president’s executive order. But this is like canvassing the opinion of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the KGB, and the Red Army to find out whether communism was as bad as it was painted. It is precisely the nature of the architects’ authority that is at issue.
The president’s executive order starts from what seems to me an indisputable premise, that much if not most of the federal building carried out in the past half century has been at best undistinguished and at worst hideous. But in the 1930s and even later, federal buildings that were (and will always be) a great adornment to the city, such as the Supreme Court and the Jefferson Memorial, were built. And it is not possible that what was possible then should not be possible now.
According to the executive order, classical architecture that takes its inspiration from ancient Greece and Rome symbolizes the American founding aspiration toward democracy and the rule of law. Critics point out that both were slave societies, says the professor, and indeed that the slave-owners in the Southern states of America built neoclassical mansions on their plantations. I think both arguments miss the point, though simply to reject the classical world because it was slave-owning is to deny its other and longer-lasting legacy, and would also—in logic—be to reject the founding of the American republic because some of the American founding fathers were slave-owners (and not a woman among them). History is, or ought to be, more than the backward projection of our current moral enthusiasms or obsessions.
Read the Whole Article
The Best of Theodore Dalrymple


lewrockwell--2020-03-03--What Is the Deep State?

What Is the Deep State?

A new focus on the Deep State in undermining the national interests has become a serious thought for many citizens .
Not known to many , the Deep State has its origin in the British Empire and how the Round Table infiltrated former British colonies ( including India ) through America .
Last year , fuel was added to this fire when internal memos were leaked from the British-run Integrity Initiative featuring a startling account of the techniques deployed by the anti-Russian British operation to infiltrate American intelligence institutions , think tanks and media .
For those who may not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anti-Russian propaganda outfit funded to the tune of $ 140 million by the British Foreign office .
Throughout 2019 , leaks have been released featuring documents dated to the early period of Trump ’ s election , demonstrating that this organization , already active across Europe promoting anti-Russian PR and smearing nationalist leaders such as Jeremy Corbyn , was intent on spreading deeply into the State Department and setting up “ clusters ” of anti-Trump operatives .
The documents reveal high level meetings that Integrity Initiative Director Chris Donnelly had with former Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kurt Volker , Pentagon PR guru John Rendon among many others .
The Deep State : The Fa ... Mike Lofgren Best Price : $ 3.05 Buy New $ 11.03 The exposure of the British hand behind the scenes affords us a unique glimpse into the real historical forces undermining America ’ s true constitutional tradition throughout the 20th century , as Mueller/the Five Eyes/Integrity Initiative are not new phenomena but actually follow a modus operandi set down for already more than a century .
One of the biggest obstacles to seeing this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is located in the belief in a mythology which has become embedded in the global psyche for over half a century and which we should do our best to free ourselves of .
While there has been a long-standing narrative promoted for over 70 years that the British Empire disappeared after World War II having been replaced by the “ American Empire ” , it is the furthest thing from the truth .
America , as constitutionally represented by its greatest presidents ( who can unfortunately be identified by their early deaths while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colonialist and were always in favor of reining in British Institutions at home while fighting British colonial thinking abroad .
Franklin Roosevelt ’ s thirteen year-long battle with the Deep State , which he referred to as the “ economic royalists who should have left America in 1776″ , was defined in clear terms by his patriotic Vice-President Henry Wallace who warned of the emergence of a new Anglo-American fascism in 1944 when he said : The fact is that already in 1944 , a policy of Anglo-Saxon imperialism had been promoted subversively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Round Table Movement and Fabian Society , and the seeds had already been laid for the anti-Russian cold war by those British-run American fascists .
It is not a coincidence that this fascist Cold War policy was announced in a March 5 , 1946 speech in Fulton , Missouri by none other than Round Table-follower and the butcher of Bengal , Winston Churchill .
When the Round Table Movement was created with funds from the Rhodes Trust in 1902 , a new plan was laid out to create a new technocratic elite to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Empire and crush the emergence of nationalism globally .
This organization would be staffed by generations of Rhodes Scholars who would receive their indoctrination in Oxford before being sent back to advance a “ post-nation state ” agenda in their respective countries .
As this agenda largely followed the mandate set out by Cecil Rhodes in his Seventh Will who said “ Why should we not form a secret society with but one object : the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and for the making of the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire ?
” With the help of an anglophile , racist president in America , leading figures organizing these think tanks first advanced a program to create a “ League of Nations ” as the solution to the “ nationalist problem ” which humanity was told “ caused ” World War One .
Nationalist forces in America rejected the idea that the constitution should be rendered obsolete and the plan for global governance failed .
However that did not stop the Round @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Round Table controller Lord Lothian ( British Ambassador to the USA ) complained of the “ American problem ” in 1918 .
There is a fundamentally different concept in regard to this question between Great Britain and the United States as to the necessity of civilized control over politically backward peoples… .
The inhabitants of Africa and parts of Asia have proved unable to govern themselves… .
Yet America not only has no conception of this aspect of the problem but has been led to believe that the assumption of this kind of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an attitude towards the problem of world government exactly analogous to the one they [ earlier ] took toward the problem of the world war .
If they are slow in learning we shall be condemned to a period of strained relations between the various parts of the English-speaking world .
[ We must ] get into the heads of Canadians and Americans that a share in the burden of world government is just as great and glorious a responsibility as participation in the war ” .
A Chinese leader of the American-inspired @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warned of the likes of Lord Lothian and the League of Nations in 1924 when he said : By 1919 , the Round Table Movement changed its name to the Royal Institute for International Affairs ( aka : Chatham House ) with the “ Round Table ” name relegated to its geopolitical periodical .
In Canada and Australia , branches were created in 1928 under the rubrics of “ Canadian and Australian Institutes for International Affairs ” ( CIIA , AIIA ) .
However in America , where knowledge of the British Empire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ known , the name “ American Institute for International Affairs ” was still too delicate .
Instead the name “ Council on Foreign Relations ” was chosen and was chartered in 1921 .
Staffed with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians , the CFR ( and its International Chatham House counterparts ) dubbed themselves “ independent think tanks ” which interfaced with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians in academia , government and the private sector alike with the mission of advancing a foreign policy agenda that was in alignment with the British Empire ’ s dream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One such Rhodes Scholar was William Yandall Elliot , who played a major role mentoring Henry Kissinger and a generation of geo-politicians from Harvard , not the least of whom include Zbigniew Brzezinski , Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Samuel ( Clash of Civilizations ) Huntington .
In Canada , five leading Rhodes Scholars were busy creating the League of Social Reconstruction as a self-described “ Fabian Society of Canada ” in 1931 which was meant to be a fascist/technocratic answer to the chaos of “ greedy nationalism ” that supposedly caused the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
During the same time in America , a different path to fascism was taken by these networks during the early 1930s .
This plan involved installing a General named Smedley Butler into power as a puppet dictator steered by the Anglo-American establishment .
Luckily for America and the world , General Butler blew the whistle on the coup against Franklin Roosevelt at the last minute .
The American Deep Stat ... Peter Dale Scott Best Price : $ 23.25 Buy New $ 23.06 Though it took a few assassinations throughout the post @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the State Department ushered in a new era of British occupation of American foreign policy , whereby the republic increasingly became the “ Dumb Giant ” acting as “ American Brawn for the British brains ” using Churchill ’ s words .
While a nihilistic generation of youth were tuning in on LSD , and an old guard of patriots surrounding Wallace and Kennedy had fallen to the “ red scare ” witch hunt , geopolitical theory was fed like a sweet poison down the throat of a sleeping nation , replacing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cooperation ” advanced by true nationalist patriots as FDR , Wallace and the Kennedys , with an imperial clone masquerading as a republic .
Sir Kissinger did nothing less than reveal his total allegiance to the British Empire on May 10 , 1981 during a Chatham House conference in Britain when he described his relationship with the British Foreign office in the following terms : During this period , Kissinger worked closely with CIA director George Bush Senior , who was later rewarded for his role in advancing the British-planned first war on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set the stage for the second wave of Middle East wars beginning with the Anglo-Saudi orchestrated operation known as 9/11 and the ushering in of the new “ post-nation state order ” by Kissinger and Blair .
This was the era which was celebrated by both Kissinger and Bush in sundry places as “ the New World Order ” .

A new focus on the Deep State in undermining the national interests has become a serious thought for many citizens. Not known to many, the Deep State has its origin in the British Empire and how the Round Table infiltrated former British colonies (including India) through America.
Last year, fuel was added to this fire when internal memos were leaked from the British-run Integrity Initiative featuring a startling account of the techniques deployed by the anti-Russian British operation to infiltrate American intelligence institutions, think tanks and media.
The Integrity Initiative
For those who may not know, The Integrity Initiative is an anti-Russian propaganda outfit funded to the tune of $140 million by the British Foreign office. Throughout 2019, leaks have been released featuring documents dated to the early period of Trump’s election, demonstrating that this organization, already active across Europe promoting anti-Russian PR and smearing nationalist leaders such as Jeremy Corbyn, was intent on spreading deeply into the State Department and setting up “clusters” of anti-Trump operatives. The documents reveal high level meetings that Integrity Initiative Director Chris Donnelly had with former Trump Advisor Sebastien Gorka, McCain Foundation director Kurt Volker, Pentagon PR guru John Rendon among many others. The Deep State: The Fa... Lofgren, Mike Best Price: $2.15 Buy New $11.01 (as of 11:20 UTC - Details)
The exposure of the British hand behind the scenes affords us a unique glimpse into the real historical forces undermining America’s true constitutional tradition throughout the 20th century, as Mueller/the Five Eyes/Integrity Initiative are not new phenomena but actually follow a modus operandi set down for already more than a century. One of the biggest obstacles to seeing this modus operandi run by the British Empire is located in the belief in a mythology which has become embedded in the global psyche for over half a century and which we should do our best to free ourselves of.
Myth of the “American Empire”
While there has been a long-standing narrative promoted for over 70 years that the British Empire disappeared after World War II having been replaced by the “American Empire”, it is the furthest thing from the truth. America, as constitutionally represented by its greatest presidents (who can unfortunately be identified by their early deaths while serving in office), were never colonialist and were always in favor of reining in British Institutions at home while fighting British colonial thinking abroad.
Franklin Roosevelt’s thirteen year-long battle with the Deep State, which he referred to as the “economic royalists who should have left America in 1776″, was defined in clear terms by his patriotic Vice-President Henry Wallace who warned of the emergence of a new Anglo-American fascism in 1944 when he said:
“Fascism in the postwar inevitably will push steadily for Anglo-Saxon imperialism and eventually for war with Russia. Already American fascists are talking and writing about this conflict and using it as an excuse for their internal hatreds and intolerances toward certain races, creeds and classes.”
The fact is that already in 1944, a policy of Anglo-Saxon imperialism had been promoted subversively by British-run think tanks known as the Round Table Movement and Fabian Society, and the seeds had already been laid for the anti-Russian cold war by those British-run American fascists. It is not a coincidence that this fascist Cold War policy was announced in a March 5, 1946 speech in Fulton, Missouri by none other than Round Table-follower and the butcher of Bengal, Winston Churchill.
The Round Table Movement
When the Round Table Movement was created with funds from the Rhodes Trust in 1902, a new plan was laid out to create a new technocratic elite to manage the re-emergence of the new British Empire and crush the emergence of nationalism globally. This organization would be staffed by generations of Rhodes Scholars who would receive their indoctrination in Oxford before being sent back to advance a “post-nation state” agenda in their respective countries.
As this agenda largely followed the mandate set out by Cecil Rhodes in his Seventh Will who said “Why should we not form a secret society with but one object: the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, and for the making of the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire?”
Q: Is @ShashiTharoor serving the RETURN OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY ecosystem? His new boss is Shoaib Bajwa, son of British spy, and from same community as Pakistan’s General Bajwa head of military.https://t.co/f74pgkDfQU — Rajiv Malhotra (@RajivMessage) November 30, 2019
With the help of an anglophile, racist president in America, leading figures organizing these think tanks first advanced a program to create a “League of Nations” as the solution to the “nationalist problem” which humanity was told “caused” World War One. Nationalist forces in America rejected the idea that the constitution should be rendered obsolete and the plan for global governance failed. However that did not stop the Round Table Movement from trying again. Leading Round Table controller Lord Lothian (British Ambassador to the USA) complained of the “American problem” in 1918.
There is a fundamentally different concept in regard to this question between Great Britain and the United States as to the necessity of civilized control over politically backward peoples…. The inhabitants of Africa and parts of Asia have proved unable to govern themselves…. Yet America not only has no conception of this aspect of the problem but has been led to believe that the assumption of this kind of responsibility is iniquitous imperialism. They take an attitude towards the problem of world government exactly analogous to the one they [earlier] took toward the problem of the world war. If they are slow in learning we shall be condemned to a period of strained relations between the various parts of the English-speaking world. [We must] get into the heads of Canadians and Americans that a share in the burden of world government is just as great and glorious a responsibility as participation in the war”.
A Chinese leader of the American-inspired republican revolution of 1911 named Sun Yat-sen warned of the likes of Lord Lothian and the League of Nations in 1924 when he said:
“The nations which are employing imperialism to conquer others and which are trying to maintain their own favored positions as sovereign lords of the whole world are advocating cosmopolitanism [aka: global governance/globalization -ed] and want the world to join them… Nationalism is that precious possession by which humanity maintains its existence. If nationalism decays, then when cosmopolitanism flourishes we will be unable to survive and will be eliminated”.
Council on Foreign Relations
By 1919, the Round Table Movement changed its name to the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka: Chatham House) with the “Round Table” name relegated to its geopolitical periodical. In Canada and Australia, branches were created in 1928 under the rubrics of “Canadian and Australian Institutes for International Affairs” (CIIA, AIIA). However in America, where knowledge of the British Empire’s subversive role was more widely known, the name “American Institute for International Affairs” was still too delicate. Instead the name “Council on Foreign Relations” was chosen and was chartered in 1921.
Staffed with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians, the CFR (and its International Chatham House counterparts) dubbed themselves “independent think tanks” which interfaced with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians in academia, government and the private sector alike with the mission of advancing a foreign policy agenda that was in alignment with the British Empire’s dream of an Anglo-American “special relationship”. One such Rhodes Scholar was William Yandall Elliot, who played a major role mentoring Henry Kissinger and a generation of geo-politicians from Harvard, not the least of whom include Zbigniew Brzezinski, Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Samuel (Clash of Civilizations) Huntington.
Coup Against FDR
In Canada, five leading Rhodes Scholars were busy creating the League of Social Reconstruction as a self-described “Fabian Society of Canada” in 1931 which was meant to be a fascist/technocratic answer to the chaos of “greedy nationalism” that supposedly caused the economic collapse of Black Friday in 1929. During the same time in America, a different path to fascism was taken by these networks during the early 1930s. This plan involved installing a General named Smedley Butler into power as a puppet dictator steered by the Anglo-American establishment. Luckily for America and the world, General Butler blew the whistle on the coup against Franklin Roosevelt at the last minute. The American Deep Stat... Peter Dale Scott Best Price: $23.25 Buy New $23.06 (as of 09:10 UTC - Details)
Kissinger’s British Takeover of America
Though it took a few assassinations throughout the post war years, Kissinger’s takeover of the State Department ushered in a new era of British occupation of American foreign policy, whereby the republic increasingly became the “Dumb Giant” acting as “American Brawn for the British brains” using Churchill’s words. While a nihilistic generation of youth were tuning in on LSD, and an old guard of patriots surrounding Wallace and Kennedy had fallen to the “red scare” witch hunt, geopolitical theory was fed like a sweet poison down the throat of a sleeping nation, replacing a policy of peace and “win-win cooperation” advanced by true nationalist patriots as FDR, Wallace and the Kennedys, with an imperial clone masquerading as a republic.
Sir Kissinger did nothing less than reveal his total allegiance to the British Empire on May 10, 1981 during a Chatham House conference in Britain when he described his relationship with the British Foreign office in the following terms:
“The British were so matter-of-factly helpful that they became a participant in internal American deliberations, to a degree probably never practiced between sovereign nations… In my White House incarnation then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department… It was symptomatic”.
During this period, Kissinger worked closely with CIA director George Bush Senior, who was later rewarded for his role in advancing the British-planned first war on Kuwait with a knighthood. This war set the stage for the second wave of Middle East wars beginning with the Anglo-Saudi orchestrated operation known as 9/11 and the ushering in of the new “post-nation state order” by Kissinger and Blair.
This was the era which was celebrated by both Kissinger and Bush in sundry places as “the New World Order”.
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-03-03--The Establishment’s Ultimatum: Scuttle Bernie!

After Joe Biden ’ s blowout victory in South Carolina Saturday and the swift withdrawal of Tom Steyer , “ Mayor Pete ” Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar , the decisive day of the race for the Democratic nomination , Super Tuesday , is at hand .
Fourteen states — including California and Texas and delegate-rich Colorado , North Carolina and Virginia — hold primaries today , where 40 % of the delegates to the Democratic convention will be chosen .
Yet consider where the Democratic Party , the party of diversity , America ’ s “ progressive ” party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ color , African Americans , Asians and Hispanics , the party of women and LGBT , will close out this day .
Of the 24 candidates who sought the nomination in 2019 , all the black candidates such as Sens .
Cory Booker and Kamala Harris and Gov .
Deval Patrick , have been eliminated .
The sole Asian American , Andrew Yang , is gone .
The Hispanic candidate , Julian Castro , is long gone .
Winning just 2 % of the black vote in South Carolina , 38-year-old gay candidate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the West : ... Patrick J. Buchanan Best Price : $ 2.12 Buy New $ 12.46 After South Carolina , the last two women in the race , Elizabeth Warren and Klobuchar , were put under pressure from the Democratic establishment in its hair-on-fire panic .
To do what ?
These female senators were to sacrifice their hopes and dreams to advance the establishment ’ s plot to derail the nomination of the unapologetic progressive who has run the best and boldest campaign of this election year — Bernie Sanders .
Klobuchar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barely hanging on .
And where does that leave the party of diversity this first week in March ?
With three potential nominees .
All three are aging white men — Joe Biden , Bernie Sanders and Mike Bloomberg .
All three , if nominated and elected , would soon celebrate their 80th birthday in the White House .
The establishment ’ s ultimatum : Everyone , get with the program of breaking Bernie and “ Go with Joe !
” or face retribution .
Of what is the establishment terrified ?
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will crush him in November .
And not only will the White House be lost , all hopes of winning the Senate and blocking Trump ’ s second-term Supreme Court nominees would also be lost .
And not only the Senate but Nancy Pelosi ’ s House could also be lost .
And not only the House but hundreds of down-ballot candidates could also lose , leaving the GOP with the whip hand in redistricting congressional seats through the decade .
For Democrats , the fear is of the Harding-Coolidge Roaring ’ 20s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ roost in the Republican Party and the populist-left of “ Crazy Bernie ” dominates the Democratic Party , what happens to the agenda of the establishment ?
Today promises to a fateful one in the history of the Democratic Party , and it will answer many questions : Will Sanders win enough delegates to give him an insurmountable lead for the nomination ?
Or will he have a good , but not a great , night , winning most of the states , but not a large enough pile of delegates to reach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
As for Mayor Mike Bloomberg , who was being urged to drop out and back Biden before he got the first returns on his $ 500 million investment in his campaign , what did he buy with that half billion ?
We shall find out today .
If his performance is disappointing , will he yield to the establishment and do what it demands to advance the killing of Sanders ’ candidacy ?
As for Biden , the questions are clear and crucial : Will the momentum from Saturday ’ s victory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other Southern and border states where the African American share of the Democratic electorate is similar to South Carolina ’ s ?
Churchill , Hitler , and ... Patrick J. Buchanan Check Amazon for Pricing .
Will today provide the clarity the establishment and Biden want , and make this a Biden-Sanders race , with those two coming into the convention with large blocs of delegates but neither with a majority ?
What the establishment wants is for the first ballot to end without a nominee — if that nominee would be Sanders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freed of their commitments , and for the superdelegates to vote on the second ballot , and for the party thus to be spared falling into the custody of an angry septuagenarian socialist .
For the Democratic establishment , the stakes could not be higher and thus that establishment , after Biden ’ s landslide in South Carolina , is not disguising its interests or demands : Sanders must be denied the nomination , and Biden is the only one who can accomplish that .
Biden might have won South Carolina without the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clyburn .
But it was Clyburn ’ s blessing that gave Biden his landslide .
And if Biden wins Alabama and other states today , the major factors of his victory will be his South Carolina landslide and his support from African Americans .
Should Biden win the nomination , still a long shot , he will be in deep political debt .
Look for Biden to put an African American woman on his ticket .
The Best of Patrick J. Buchanan

Shop all books by Pat Buchanan
After Joe Biden’s blowout victory in South Carolina Saturday and the swift withdrawal of Tom Steyer, “Mayor Pete” Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the decisive day of the race for the Democratic nomination, Super Tuesday, is at hand.
Fourteen states — including California and Texas and delegate-rich Colorado, North Carolina and Virginia — hold primaries today, where 40% of the delegates to the Democratic convention will be chosen.
Yet consider where the Democratic Party, the party of diversity, America’s “progressive” party, the all-inclusive party of persons of color, African Americans, Asians and Hispanics, the party of women and LGBT, will close out this day.
Of the 24 candidates who sought the nomination in 2019, all the black candidates such as Sens. Cory Booker and Kamala Harris and Gov. Deval Patrick, have been eliminated. The sole Asian American, Andrew Yang, is gone. The Hispanic candidate, Julian Castro, is long gone. Winning just 2% of the black vote in South Carolina, 38-year-old gay candidate Pete Buttigieg is gone. The Death of the West:... Patrick J. Buchanan Best Price: $2.12 Buy New $12.46 (as of 06:40 UTC - Details)
After South Carolina, the last two women in the race, Elizabeth Warren and Klobuchar, were put under pressure from the Democratic establishment in its hair-on-fire panic. To do what?
These female senators were to sacrifice their hopes and dreams to advance the establishment’s plot to derail the nomination of the unapologetic progressive who has run the best and boldest campaign of this election year — Bernie Sanders.
Klobuchar packed it in Monday. Warren is barely hanging on. And where does that leave the party of diversity this first week in March?
With three potential nominees. All three are aging white men — Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Mike Bloomberg. All three, if nominated and elected, would soon celebrate their 80th birthday in the White House.
The establishment’s ultimatum: Everyone, get with the program of breaking Bernie and “Go with Joe!” or face retribution.
Of what is the establishment terrified?
That if Sanders is nominated, Donald Trump will crush him in November. And not only will the White House be lost, all hopes of winning the Senate and blocking Trump’s second-term Supreme Court nominees would also be lost.
And not only the Senate but Nancy Pelosi’s House could also be lost. And not only the House but hundreds of down-ballot candidates could also lose, leaving the GOP with the whip hand in redistricting congressional seats through the decade.
For Democrats, the fear is of the Harding-Coolidge Roaring ’20s revisited.
And if Trumpists rule the roost in the Republican Party and the populist-left of “Crazy Bernie” dominates the Democratic Party, what happens to the agenda of the establishment?
Today promises to a fateful one in the history of the Democratic Party, and it will answer many questions:
Will Sanders win enough delegates to give him an insurmountable lead for the nomination? Or will he have a good, but not a great, night, winning most of the states, but not a large enough pile of delegates to reach 50% before the convention in Milwaukee?
As for Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who was being urged to drop out and back Biden before he got the first returns on his $500 million investment in his campaign, what did he buy with that half billion? We shall find out today.
If his performance is disappointing, will he yield to the establishment and do what it demands to advance the killing of Sanders’ candidacy?
As for Biden, the questions are clear and crucial: Will the momentum from Saturday’s victory be sustained and replicated in Alabama and other Southern and border states where the African American share of the Democratic electorate is similar to South Carolina’s?
Will today provide the clarity the establishment and Biden want, and make this a Biden-Sanders race, with those two coming into the convention with large blocs of delegates but neither with a majority?
What the establishment wants is for the first ballot to end without a nominee — if that nominee would be Sanders — and the pledged delegates to be freed of their commitments, and for the superdelegates to vote on the second ballot, and for the party thus to be spared falling into the custody of an angry septuagenarian socialist.
For the Democratic establishment, the stakes could not be higher and thus that establishment, after Biden’s landslide in South Carolina, is not disguising its interests or demands: Sanders must be denied the nomination, and Biden is the only one who can accomplish that.
Biden might have won South Carolina without the endorsement of veteran African American Congressman Jim Clyburn. But it was Clyburn’s blessing that gave Biden his landslide.
And if Biden wins Alabama and other states today, the major factors of his victory will be his South Carolina landslide and his support from African Americans.
Should Biden win the nomination, still a long shot, he will be in deep political debt.
Look for Biden to put an African American woman on his ticket.
The Best of Patrick J. Buchanan