lewrockwell--2020-10-02--The Evolution of Covid-19 Propaganda: 1] The Repetitive Use of Deceptive Imagery, 2] Management of t

The Evolution of Covid-19 Propaganda: 1] The Repetitive Use of Deceptive Imagery, 2] Management of the News and 3] Lying About the Worth of PCR Test Kits

“ I ate breakfast once with the president of a network news division ( at CBS ) and he told me that during non-election years , 70 % of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads .
And if you go on TV any night and watch the network news , you ’ ll see they become just a vehicle for selling pharmaceuticals .
He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a pharmaceutical account.
” — Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And here are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virology researcher and pioneer in electron microscopy about a past heavily-propagandized pandemic : Still Winning : Why Ame ... Hurt , Charles Best Price : $ 12.78 Buy New $ 13.38 “ Since AIDS had become big business , the stocks of involved giant pharmaceutical companies could not be jeopardized !
It had to be saved at all cost , even at the cost of trusting non-specific molecular markers… Fear is good business , and viruses generate fear most efficiently… So , the HIV flag had to be maximally agitated .
In worldwide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , colorful caricatures of an idealistic retrovirus… By contrast , the media has been dominated by the most rigorous censorship when it comes to informing the public about the views of thinking dissidents .
This total censorship put a safety lock on any information that could jeopardize the colossal…profits of the major pharmaceutical companies.
” — Etienne De Harven , MD – Belgian pathologist and electron microscopist who published data refuting the alleged connection between the HIV virus and AIDS , instead logically attributing the disease to lifestyle and environmental factors “ Gallo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to compensate for the missing HIV particles…This would have been acceptable if the specificity of these new molecular markers would have been clearly established .
Unfortunately , this was not the case .
The most misleading molecular marker was probably the first one , i.e .
the reverse transcriptase ( RT ) .
Following Temin and Baltimore ’ s 1970 papers in ‘ Science ’ , the RT enzymatic activity has been ( deceptively ) used as a specific retroviral marker.
” – Etienne De Harven , MD “ This digitally colorized electron @ @ @ @ @ @ @ depicts four human coronavirus particles , which are members of the Coronaviridae family .
The outer membrane of each virus is derived from the host cell membrane .
The coronavirus derives its name from the fact that under electron microscopic examination , each virion is surrounded by a corona or halo , due to the presence of “ spikes ” emanating from its proteinaceous envelope.
” Photo source : https : //phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx ?
pid=15523 “ Electron microscopic image of an isolate from the first U.S. case of COVID-19 .
The spherical extracellular viral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , seen as black dots.
” https : //phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx ?
pid=23336 A CDC artist ’ s rendition of the “ novel ” Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus-2 ( SARS-CoV-2 ) .
Photo image from here .
YI Outdoor Security Ca ... Best Price : $ 85.00 Buy New $ 39.99 ( GGK note : This now famous , totally imaginery , artist ’ s version of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was digitally-created by two artists ( Alissa Eckert and Dan Higgins , neither likely to have much science background ) who worked for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to add to the planned CDC propaganda COVID-19 campaign in mid-January 2020 – within days of Chinese virologists claiming to have positively identified a “ novel ” coronavirus as the cause of the cluster of infections in Wuhan , China .
The artists themselves chose – with official CDC approval – the color combinations for dramatic effect , even though anybody with any science background should know that viruses have no color .
PCR Testing Can ’ t Differentiate Between Benign Common Cold Coronaviruses and the Coronavirus Causing COVID-19 !
!
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( which are being sent out to hospitals ) can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.
” The following is from a medical forum .
The writer , who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US , prefers to stay anonymous , because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days .
– Julian Rose An Anonymous Nurse Speaks Out : The RT-PCR Test is Totally Unreliable , It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Best of Gary G. Kohls , MD

“I ate breakfast once with the president of a network news division (at CBS) and he told me that during non-election years, 70% of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads. And if you go on TV any night and watch the network news, you’ll see they become just a vehicle for selling pharmaceuticals. He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a pharmaceutical account.” — Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
And here are some bits of wisdom from an esteemed virology researcher and pioneer in electron microscopy about a past heavily-propagandized pandemic: Still Winning: Why Ame... Hurt, Charles Best Price: $12.78 Buy New $13.38 (as of 08:43 UTC - Details)
“Since AIDS had become big business, the stocks of involved giant pharmaceutical companies could not be jeopardized! It had to be saved at all cost, even at the cost of trusting non-specific molecular markers… Fear is good business, and viruses generate fear most efficiently… So, the HIV flag had to be maximally agitated. In worldwide media outlets, with thousands of computer-generated, colorful caricatures of an idealistic retrovirus… By contrast, the media has been dominated by the most rigorous censorship when it comes to informing the public about the views of thinking dissidents. This total censorship put a safety lock on any information that could jeopardize the colossal…profits of the major pharmaceutical companies.” — Etienne De Harven, MD – Belgian pathologist and electron microscopist who published data refuting the alleged connection between the HIV virus and AIDS, instead logically attributing the disease to lifestyle and environmental factors
“Gallo, Fauci, and others…invented molecular markers to compensate for the missing HIV particles…This would have been acceptable if the specificity of these new molecular markers would have been clearly established. Unfortunately, this was not the case. The most misleading molecular marker was probably the first one, i.e. the reverse transcriptase (RT). Following Temin and Baltimore’s 1970 papers in ‘Science’, the RT enzymatic activity has been (deceptively) used as a specific retroviral marker.” – Etienne De Harven, MD
“This digitally colorized electron microscopic image (from 1975), depicts four human coronavirus particles, which are members of the Coronaviridae family. The outer membrane of each virus is derived from the host cell membrane. The coronavirus derives its name from the fact that under electron microscopic examination, each virion is surrounded by a corona or halo, due to the presence of “spikes” emanating from its proteinaceous envelope.” Photo source: https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=15523
(GGK note: The CDC’s website contains no such images of SARS-CoV-2 viruses, substantiating the evidence that the virus that is allegedly causing COVID-19 in the United States has not yet been isolated from verifiably-infected patients; nor has the industry been able to successfully culture the SARS-CoV-2 virus in living cells – which is the usual first step in mass production of anti-viral vaccines.)
“Electron microscopic image of an isolate from the first U.S. case of COVID-19. The spherical extracellular viral particles contain cross-sections through the viral genome, seen as black dots.” https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=23336
(GGK note: It may or may not be true that the viral particles in the photomicrograph are SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Given the fact that the photomicrograph is not at a high enough level of magnification to show the spikes of a coronavirus, these viruses may not even be coronaviruses at all. Interestingly, the CDC’s website does not currently have any digitally-enhanced, colorized electron microscopic photos of viruses like the one in the 1975 photos above.)
A CDC artist’s rendition of the “novel” Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Photo image from here.
YI Outdoor Security Ca... Best Price: $85.00 Buy New $39.99 (as of 05:40 UTC - Details) (GGK note: This now famous, totally imaginery, artist’s version of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was digitally-created by two artists (Alissa Eckert and Dan Higgins, neither likely to have much science background) who worked for the CDC. They were ordered by higher-ups to add to the planned CDC propaganda COVID-19 campaign in mid-January 2020 – within days of Chinese virologists claiming to have positively identified a “novel” coronavirus as the cause of the cluster of infections in Wuhan, China. The artists themselves chose – with official CDC approval – the color combinations for dramatic effect, even though anybody with any science background should know that viruses have no color.
PCR Testing Can’t Differentiate Between Benign Common Cold Coronaviruses and the Coronavirus Causing COVID-19!!
By Julian Rose – Global Research, June 29, 2020 (1146 words)
“The idea that the Mickey Mouse test kits (which are being sent out to hospitals) can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”
The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose
An Anonymous Nurse Speaks Out: The RT-PCR Test is Totally Unreliable, It Does not Detect the Virus.
The Best of Gary G. Kohls, MD


lewrockwell--2020-10-02--Is Chris Wallace a White Supremacist?

Is Chris Wallace a White Supremacist?

After four months of looting , arson , window breaking , vandalism , intimidation , physical assaults , stabbings and shootings by Black Lives Matter and antifa , the first thing on the media ’ s mind is … getting Trump to condemn “ white supremacists ” !
It would be as if , on the morning after Pearl Harbor , the League of Nations demanded that FDR condemn American aggression in the Pacific .
Why on earth was Trump being badgered by both debate moderator Chris Wallace and Democratic nominee Joe Biden to denounce “ white supremacy ” ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked to condemn the nonstop violence by antifa that actually has been consuming the country for more than 100 nights now ?
Trump and the Jews David Rubin Best Price : $ 8.35 Buy New $ 18.16 Wallace to Trump : “ Are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia groups ?
” Trump ( perfectly accurately ) : “ Sure .
I ’ m willing to do that .
But I would say almost everything I ’ m seeing is coming from the left wing , not the right wing.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ major force in America ?
There haven ’ t been any two people in 50 years who ’ ve gotten together and said , “ Aren ’ t whites way better ?
Shouldn ’ t we rule over other people ?
” “ White supremacy ” is a bogus concept invented on college campuses .
There are white men who do horrible things , just as there are Asian men and black men who do horrible things .
But they don ’ t represent any kind of organized movement .
12x42 Powerful Binocul @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what ’ s an organized movement ?
Antifa — Rose City Antifa , Antifa Seven Hills , Antifa Sacramento , Atlanta “ Antifascists ” and so on .
They ’ re organized well enough that hundreds , sometimes thousands , of antifa members always know exactly when and where to show up , and what weapons to bring .
Then they turn around and celebrate the destruction they ’ ve wrought ( unpunished by Democratic mayors and liberal district attorneys ) .
But in Chris Wallace ’ s demon-haunted imagination , out beyond @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a scary world of pickup trucks being driven by men with long-barreled guns trying to re-enact “ Roots.
” ( And they shop at Walmart ! )
When Trump tried to bring up Pearl Harbor — i.e.
, the actual violence , as opposed to liberal imaginary violence — Wallace cited Kenosha .

After four months of looting, arson, window breaking, vandalism, intimidation, physical assaults, stabbings and shootings by Black Lives Matter and antifa, the first thing on the media’s mind is … getting Trump to condemn “white supremacists”!
It would be as if, on the morning after Pearl Harbor, the League of Nations demanded that FDR condemn American aggression in the Pacific.
Why on earth was Trump being badgered by both debate moderator Chris Wallace and Democratic nominee Joe Biden to denounce “white supremacy”? And why wasn’t Biden ever asked to condemn the nonstop violence by antifa that actually has been consuming the country for more than 100 nights now? Trump and the Jews David Rubin Best Price: $8.35 Buy New $18.16 (as of 05:41 UTC - Details)
Wallace to Trump: “Are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia groups?”
Trump (perfectly accurately): “Sure. I’m willing to do that. But I would say almost everything I’m seeing is coming from the left wing, not the right wing.”
The media’s position on the murderous BLM and antifa riots has gone from What riots? They’re peaceful protests! to The rioters are white supremacist Trump supporters!
Who thinks white supremacists are a major force in America? There haven’t been any two people in 50 years who’ve gotten together and said, “Aren’t whites way better? Shouldn’t we rule over other people?”
“White supremacy” is a bogus concept invented on college campuses. There are white men who do horrible things, just as there are Asian men and black men who do horrible things. But they don’t represent any kind of organized movement.
12x42 Powerful Binocul... Buy New $48.86 (as of 05:41 UTC - Details) You know what’s an organized movement? Antifa — Rose City Antifa, Antifa Seven Hills, Antifa Sacramento, Atlanta “Antifascists” and so on. They’re organized well enough that hundreds, sometimes thousands, of antifa members always know exactly when and where to show up, and what weapons to bring. Then they turn around and celebrate the destruction they’ve wrought (unpunished by Democratic mayors and liberal district attorneys).
But in Chris Wallace’s demon-haunted imagination, out beyond the coastal cities, there’s a scary world of pickup trucks being driven by men with long-barreled guns trying to re-enact “Roots.” (And they shop at Walmart!)
When Trump tried to bring up Pearl Harbor — i.e., the actual violence, as opposed to liberal imaginary violence — Wallace cited Kenosha.
REMINDER: After two nights of looting and arson by “peaceful protesters” in Kenosha in response to the police shooting of a knife-wielding black man resisting arrest, a group of men calling themselves “Armed Citizens to Protect Our Lives and Property” did just that. One of the men, Kyle Rittenhouse, shot three antifa as they were attacking him, killing two, in a clear case of self-defense.
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-10-02--Melinda Gates Slams Social Media for Spreading ‘Disinfo’

In a September 2020 interview with Axios on HBO , Melinda Gates said “ It may be time for a reckoning ” with social media ’ s role in spreading disinformation .
According to Axios:1 It ’ s ironic , to say the least , considering the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funds and influences mainstream media companies , which in turn write whatever the Gates desire , be it truthful or not , without disclosing their conflict of interest .
Through its grants to the Leo Burnett Company , an ad agency owned by Publicis , the Gates Foundation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HealthGuard , as both of these “ fact-checking ” sites are funded by Publicis .
As such , Gates already has the power to pull strings and censor content they don ’ t like .
Trump ’ s Unfinish ... Cioccolanti , Steve Best Price : $ 18.88 Buy New $ 19.44 The Gates Foundation also has a history of funding disreputable and flawed to the point of being fraudulent science .
What they call “ disinformation ” and “ conspiracy theories ” are to a large extent merely information exposing the Gates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Case in point : The Gates Foundation funds the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis to the tune of millions of dollars per year .
The MRC Centre is the leading body advising world governments and the World Health Organization about infectious disease outbreaks .
Neil Ferguson , a professor of mathematical biology at Imperial College London and co-founder of the MRC Centre , has produced a string of pandemic predictions that have turned out to be spectacularly incorrect:2,3 •In 2001 , Ferguson ’ s team produced a model for the spread @ @ @ @ @ @ @ livestock , concluding that even in cases where there was no evidence of infection , animals had to be culled to curtail the outbreak .
The projection led to the slaughter of more than 6 million cattle , sheep and pigs in the U.K. that year , costing the national economy an estimated £10 billion .
As reported by Spectator:4 •In 2002 , Ferguson predicted that by 2080 , beef tainted with mad cow disease could kill up to 50,000 people , with a worst-case scenario killing 150,000.5 As of 2015 , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the U.K. , the human version of mad cow disease.6 •In 2005 , Ferguson forecasted that 200 million people would die from bird flu .
Meanwhile , in the real world , just 282 people died from bird flu , worldwide , between 2003 and 2009.7 •In 2009 , Ferguson predicted the swine flu would have a case fatality rate of 0.3 % to 1.5 % , with the most likely fatality rate being right around 0.4 % .
Based on this model , the U.K. ’ s projected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic ended , it turned out to have a death rate of just 0.026 % , killing just 457 Britons.8 •In 2020 , Ferguson ’ s Imperial College model for COVID-19 , relied on by governments around the world , led to the most draconian pandemic response measures in modern history .
It predicted9 the U.K. would be looking at a death toll of more than 500,000 , and the U.S. some 2.2 million , if no action was taken .
Based on the experiences of certain countries that chose not to lock @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , such as Sweden , we can now see that authoritarian pandemic responses have had little if any beneficial impact .
Mini Spy Camera 1080P ... Best Price : $ 26.22 Buy New $ 28.99 According to Ferguson , his woefully incorrect prediction was based on “ undocumented , 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic , ” the National Review reported.10 Analyses11,12 of the problematic bugs in the code have been published by a software engineer on LockdownSceptics.org .
According to the author , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ false statements and claims about this code .
In May 2020 , Ferguson — nicknamed “ Professor Lockdown ” — resigned as government adviser to the U.K. after being caught breaking the very lockdown and social distancing rules he so strongly advocated for , to meet up with his married lover.13 Ferguson ’ s predictions have been so far off the mark , fellow academics have started referring to him as “ The Master of Disaster.
” 14 Jan Schnitzer , a vascular biology expert and former scientific director of the Sidney Kimmel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ saying Ferguson “ dances on the edge of being a publicity-seeking charlatan.
” You ’ d think that with this kind of abysmal track record , funding would have dried up long before COVID-19 hit .
But no .
This is precisely the kind of convenient disinformation and gross overestimation of risk that Gates needs and relies on to drive his own vaccine and tech agendas forward .
Gates also has close links to Dr. Anthony Fauci , a key member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force , so it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given a few talking points here and there to help shepherd the masses .
Fauci was a member of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ’ s Global Grand Challenges scientific board16 ( described as a “ family of initiatives fostering innovation to solve key global health and development problems ” 17 ) from 2003 until 2010 , at which time he joined the Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation ’ s Decade of Vaccines Collaboration.18 Centrum Silver Multivi ... Buy New $ 14.99 ( $ 0.07 / Count ) In 2012 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Diseases , of which Fauci has been the director since 1984 , also began forging close ties with GAVI , The Vaccine Alliance.19 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation founded GAVI in 1999 and has permanent seats on its board of directors.20 In a September 2020 article,21 environmental activist Vandana Shiva reviews Gates ’ global agenda and “ war on life , ” highlighting the March 2015 TED Talk22 he gave in which he showed an image of a coronavirus .
This , he said , was what “ the greatest catastrophe of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Shiva writes , adding : Shiva goes on to review a patent granted to Microsoft the last week of March 2020 , for a cryptocurrency system based on human body activity .
Everything from brain activity and body fluid flows to organ activity and various muscle movements is to be used to mine for cryptocurrency in this system .
Coincidentally , the number on this patent is 060606 .
Remove the zeros and you end up with the ill-fated number “ 666 , ” which also happens to show up in the monstrously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Trump : Think Like a Bi ... McIver , Meredith Best Price : $ 2.50 Buy New $ 6.48 Ultimately , Gates vision , Shiva says , includes the colonization of our children ’ s minds and bodies “ before they even have the opportunity to understand what freedom and sovereignty look and feel like.
” To this end , Gates is working on reinventing education .
Indeed , the COVID-19 lockdowns and social distancing rules have repeatedly been referred to as “ the new normal.
” If the technocrats get their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kinds of people in the world : The uber-rich top echelon to whom rules don ’ t apply , digital slaves , and disposables — people who have no value in this new digital empire .
If this doesn ’ t sound like the life we want to live , we must , as Shiva proposes , resist .
And we must start now .
Are We in a Deadly Dilemma ?
We now face what , for some , is a choice between two evils : Living with SARS-CoV-2 , or continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for some , ” because others have accepted the data showing that COVID-19 , in terms of lethality , is no worse than influenza , poses an exceptionally low risk for people under the age of 40 and virtually no risk at all to young adults and children .
The WHO has published data showing the overall infection mortality rate COVID-19 is about 0.6 % ,26 and according to CDC data27 released August 26 , 2020 , only 6 % of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-19 listed as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certificate .
A September 2 , 2020 study28 found the overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality ratio was a mere 0.26 % .
Among those under the age of 40 , the infection fatality ratio is 0.01 % , while those over 60 have an infection fatality ratio of 1.71 % .
The estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza is 0.8 % ,29 so this shows the only people for whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is more dangerous than influenza is those over the age of 60 .
Everyone else has a lower risk of dying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the flu .
White House coronavirus task force coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx also confirmed a lower than typically reported mortality rate when she , in mid-August 2020 , stated that it “ becomes more and more difficult ” to get people to comply with mask rules “ when people start to realize that 99 % of us are going to be fine.
” 30 In her August 16 , 2020 , Doctor for Disaster Preparedness31 lecture , Dr. Lee Merritt points out that based on deaths per capita , the death rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minuscule 0.009 % ( 709,000 people have died from or with COVID-19 around the world , and the global population is 7.8 billion ) .
So , the average person ’ s chance of surviving this disease is 99.991 % .
Live Life or Hide Until You Die Under normal circumstances , these data would convince just about everyone that COVID-19 is not a significant threat .
Certainly , not sufficient to meekly relinquish our most basic human rights .
Unfortunately , months of hardcore fear-mongering and censorship , largely spearheaded by Gates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the largest funder of , has led to a situation where people fear COVID-19 more than just about everything else .
It is with that mindset that some people find themselves having to make a choice to either live with the threat of COVID-19 , or continue hiding from it , which means ceasing to live indefinitely .
As noted in an “ open letter to world leaders ” published on Secret-Retreats.com , the path of hiding:32 Meanwhile , the other path , the path of accepting the risks associated with life , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ fight against “ disinformation ” is really a fight against facts showing that the technocratic takeover is not an inevitable outcome of a global pandemic , but rather the result of a long-term well-planned effort .
If you haven ’ t taken steps to extricate yourself from their digital grasp as of yet , now ’ s the time to do it .
For tips and guidance , see “ Harvard Professor Exposes Surveillance Capitalism.
” The Best of Joseph Mercola

In a September 2020 interview with Axios on HBO, Melinda Gates said “It may be time for a reckoning” with social media’s role in spreading disinformation. According to Axios:1
“Bill and Melinda Gates … [have] seen firsthand the impact of disinformation, as they’ve become targets of conspiracy theories amplified and spread via social media … [Melinda] Gates … said society may need to start holding social media companies to account for their role in helping such disinformation spread.”
It’s ironic, to say the least, considering the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funds and influences mainstream media companies, which in turn write whatever the Gates desire, be it truthful or not, without disclosing their conflict of interest.
Through its grants to the Leo Burnett Company, an ad agency owned by Publicis, the Gates Foundation is also financially linked to NewsGuard and HealthGuard, as both of these “fact-checking” sites are funded by Publicis. As such, Gates already has the power to pull strings and censor content they don’t like. Trump’s Unfinish... Cioccolanti, Steve Best Price: $18.88 Buy New $19.44 (as of 05:42 UTC - Details)
Gates Foundation Funds Scientific Disinformation
The Gates Foundation also has a history of funding disreputable and flawed to the point of being fraudulent science. What they call “disinformation” and “conspiracy theories” are to a large extent merely information exposing the Gates Foundation’s own disinformation campaigns.
Case in point: The Gates Foundation funds the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis to the tune of millions of dollars per year. The MRC Centre is the leading body advising world governments and the World Health Organization about infectious disease outbreaks.
Neil Ferguson, a professor of mathematical biology at Imperial College London and co-founder of the MRC Centre, has produced a string of pandemic predictions that have turned out to be spectacularly incorrect:2,3
•In 2001, Ferguson’s team produced a model for the spread of foot and mouth disease in British livestock, concluding that even in cases where there was no evidence of infection, animals had to be culled to curtail the outbreak.
The projection led to the slaughter of more than 6 million cattle, sheep and pigs in the U.K. that year, costing the national economy an estimated £10 billion. As reported by Spectator:4
“It has been claimed by experts such as Michael Thrusfield, professor of veterinary epidemiology at Edinburgh University, that Ferguson’s modelling on foot and mouth was ‘severely flawed’ and made a ‘serious error’ by ‘ignoring the species composition of farms,’ and the fact that the disease spread faster between different species.”
•In 2002, Ferguson predicted that by 2080, beef tainted with mad cow disease could kill up to 50,000 people, with a worst-case scenario killing 150,000.5 As of 2015, there had only been 177 human deaths attributable to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the U.K., the human version of mad cow disease.6
•In 2005, Ferguson forecasted that 200 million people would die from bird flu. Meanwhile, in the real world, just 282 people died from bird flu, worldwide, between 2003 and 2009.7
•In 2009, Ferguson predicted the swine flu would have a case fatality rate of 0.3% to 1.5%, with the most likely fatality rate being right around 0.4%. Based on this model, the U.K.’s projected death toll was 65,000. Once the pandemic ended, it turned out to have a death rate of just 0.026%, killing just 457 Britons.8
•In 2020, Ferguson’s Imperial College model for COVID-19, relied on by governments around the world, led to the most draconian pandemic response measures in modern history. It predicted9 the U.K. would be looking at a death toll of more than 500,000, and the U.S. some 2.2 million, if no action was taken.
Based on the experiences of certain countries that chose not to lock down or mandate draconian disease prevention measures, such as Sweden, we can now see that authoritarian pandemic responses have had little if any beneficial impact. Mini Spy Camera 1080P ... Best Price: $26.22 Buy New $28.99 (as of 05:42 UTC - Details)
According to Ferguson, his woefully incorrect prediction was based on “undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic,” the National Review reported.10
Analyses11,12 of the problematic bugs in the code have been published by a software engineer on LockdownSceptics.org. According to the author, the Imperial College has made a number of false statements and claims about this code.
In May 2020, Ferguson — nicknamed “Professor Lockdown” — resigned as government adviser to the U.K. after being caught breaking the very lockdown and social distancing rules he so strongly advocated for, to meet up with his married lover.13
Science for Hire
Ferguson’s predictions have been so far off the mark, fellow academics have started referring to him as “The Master of Disaster.”14 Jan Schnitzer, a vascular biology expert and former scientific director of the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center in San Diego is quoted15 saying Ferguson “dances on the edge of being a publicity-seeking charlatan.”
You’d think that with this kind of abysmal track record, funding would have dried up long before COVID-19 hit. But no. This is precisely the kind of convenient disinformation and gross overestimation of risk that Gates needs and relies on to drive his own vaccine and tech agendas forward.
The coronavirus pandemic and lockdown have revealed even more clearly how we are being reduced to objects to be controlled, with our bodies and minds as the new colonies to be invaded … The extended coronavirus lockdown has been a lab experiment for a future without humanity. ~ Vandana Shiva
Gates also has close links to Dr. Anthony Fauci, a key member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, so it’s hard to imagine Fauci has not been given a few talking points here and there to help shepherd the masses.
Fauci was a member of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Grand Challenges scientific board16 (described as a “family of initiatives fostering innovation to solve key global health and development problems”17) from 2003 until 2010, at which time he joined the Leadership Council of the Gates Foundation’s Decade of Vaccines Collaboration.18
Centrum Silver Multivi... Buy New $14.99 ($0.07 / Count) (as of 05:42 UTC - Details) In 2012, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of which Fauci has been the director since 1984, also began forging close ties with GAVI, The Vaccine Alliance.19 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation founded GAVI in 1999 and has permanent seats on its board of directors.20
Gates’ War on Life
In a September 2020 article,21 environmental activist Vandana Shiva reviews Gates’ global agenda and “war on life,” highlighting the March 2015 TED Talk22 he gave in which he showed an image of a coronavirus. This, he said, was what “the greatest catastrophe of our time would look like,” Shiva writes, adding:
“When the coronavirus pandemic swept over the earth like a tsunami five years later, he revived the war language, describing the pandemic as ‘a world war’ … In fact, the pandemic is not a war. The pandemic is a consequence of war. A war against life …
The health emergency of the coronavirus is inseparable from the health emergency of extinction, the health emergency of biodiversity loss … [T]hese emergencies are rooted in an economic model based on the illusion of limitless growth and limitless greed, which violate planetary boundaries, and destroy the integrity of ecosystems and individual species
According to the International Labour Organization,23 ‘1.6 billion informal economy workers (representing the most vulnerable in the labor market), out of a worldwide total of 2 billion and a global workforce of 3.3 billion, have suffered massive damage to their capacity to earn a living. This is due to lockdown measures and/or because they work in the hardest-hit sectors.’
According to the World Food Programme,24 a quarter of a billion additional people will be pushed to hunger and 300,000 could die every day … Killing cannot be a prescription for saving lives.
Health is about life and living systems. There is no ‘life’ in the paradigm of health that Bill Gates and his ilk are promoting and imposing on the entire world. Gates has created global alliances to impose top-down analysis and prescriptions for health problems.
He gives money to define the problems, and then he uses his influence and money to impose the solutions. And in the process, he gets richer. His ‘funding’ results in an erasure of democracy and biodiversity, of nature and culture. His ‘philanthropy’ is not just philanthrocapitalism. It is philanthroimperialism.
The coronavirus pandemic and lockdown have revealed even more clearly how we are being reduced to objects to be controlled, with our bodies and minds as the new colonies to be invaded … The extended coronavirus lockdown has been a lab experiment for a future without humanity.”
Cryptocurrency System Based on Human Body Activity
Shiva goes on to review a patent granted to Microsoft the last week of March 2020, for a cryptocurrency system based on human body activity. Everything from brain activity and body fluid flows to organ activity and various muscle movements is to be used to mine for cryptocurrency in this system.
Coincidentally, the number on this patent is 060606. Remove the zeros and you end up with the ill-fated number “666,” which also happens to show up in the monstrously unconstitutional U.S. surveillance bill H.R. 6666.
“The patent is an intellectual property claim over our bodies and minds,” Shiva writes.25 “In colonialism, colonizers assign themselves the right to take the land and resources of indigenous people, extinguish their cultures and sovereignty, and in extreme cases exterminate them.
Patent WO 060606 is a declaration by Microsoft that our bodies and minds are its new colonies. We are mines of ‘raw material’ — the data extracted from our bodies.
Rather than sovereign, spiritual, conscious, intelligent beings making decisions and choices with wisdom and ethical values about the impacts of our actions on the natural and social world of which we are a part, and to which we are inextricably related, we are ‘users.’ A ‘user’ is a consumer without choice in the digital empire.”
Trump: Think Like a Bi... McIver, Meredith Best Price: $2.50 Buy New $6.48 (as of 05:42 UTC - Details) Ultimately, Gates vision, Shiva says, includes the colonization of our children’s minds and bodies “before they even have the opportunity to understand what freedom and sovereignty look and feel like.” To this end, Gates is working on reinventing education.
“The dystopia is one where children never return to schools, do not have a chance to play, do not have friends. It is a world without society, without relationships, without love and friendship,” she writes.
Indeed, the COVID-19 lockdowns and social distancing rules have repeatedly been referred to as “the new normal.” If the technocrats get their way, there will essentially be three kinds of people in the world: The uber-rich top echelon to whom rules don’t apply, digital slaves, and disposables — people who have no value in this new digital empire. If this doesn’t sound like the life we want to live, we must, as Shiva proposes, resist. And we must start now.
“We can seed another future, deepen our democracies, reclaim our commons, regenerate the earth as living members of a One Earth Family, rich in our diversity and freedom, one in our unity and interconnectedness. It is a healthier future. It is one we must fight for. It is one we must claim,” Shiva writes.
Are We in a Deadly Dilemma?
We now face what, for some, is a choice between two evils: Living with SARS-CoV-2, or continue hiding from it. I say “for some,” because others have accepted the data showing that COVID-19, in terms of lethality, is no worse than influenza, poses an exceptionally low risk for people under the age of 40 and virtually no risk at all to young adults and children.
The WHO has published data showing the overall infection mortality rate COVID-19 is about 0.6%,26 and according to CDC data27 released August 26, 2020, only 6% of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate.
A September 2, 2020 study28 found the overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality ratio was a mere 0.26%. Among those under the age of 40, the infection fatality ratio is 0.01%, while those over 60 have an infection fatality ratio of 1.71%.
The estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza is 0.8%,29 so this shows the only people for whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is more dangerous than influenza is those over the age of 60. Everyone else has a lower risk of dying from COVID-19 than they have of dying from the flu.
White House coronavirus task force coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx also confirmed a lower than typically reported mortality rate when she, in mid-August 2020, stated that it “becomes more and more difficult” to get people to comply with mask rules “when people start to realize that 99% of us are going to be fine.”30
In her August 16, 2020, Doctor for Disaster Preparedness31 lecture, Dr. Lee Merritt points out that based on deaths per capita, the death rate for COVID-19, worldwide, is a minuscule 0.009% (709,000 people have died from or with COVID-19 around the world, and the global population is 7.8 billion). So, the average person’s chance of surviving this disease is 99.991%.
Live Life or Hide Until You Die
Under normal circumstances, these data would convince just about everyone that COVID-19 is not a significant threat. Certainly, not sufficient to meekly relinquish our most basic human rights. Unfortunately, months of hardcore fear-mongering and censorship, largely spearheaded by Gates and the WHO, which Gates is the largest funder of, has led to a situation where people fear COVID-19 more than just about everything else.
It is with that mindset that some people find themselves having to make a choice to either live with the threat of COVID-19, or continue hiding from it, which means ceasing to live indefinitely. As noted in an “open letter to world leaders” published on Secret-Retreats.com, the path of hiding:32
“… has but one outcome, to condemn entire populations to misery, poverty, hunger, economic ruin and physical death. There is no hope in this path. COVID is here to stay. We will probably never have an effective vaccine (viruses by their very nature constantly mutate) and so there is no hope of a safe exit from this strategy …
The endgame of this strategy of closing a country, is the total destruction of that country’s economy, immense damage to the health and welfare of society, and plunging that country’s future into darkness.”
Meanwhile, the other path, the path of accepting the risks associated with life, COVID-19 included:
“… offers a path where there is hope for the future. Where life can go on as normal for the vast majority. It is a path where the rewards will far outweigh the cost … [It] has become clear that for the vast majority of people COVID presents no real risk of harm or even symptomatic illness.
But is it possible to live without risk? Clearly not. A life without risk is impossible. Is it possible to escape death? No. It is the very condition of living; life is terminal for us all. And death comes to us in 1000s of forms, not simply COVID. We cannot hide from death. How many people have died through hiding in fear from a perceived threat from COVID?
How many people are dying daily as a direct result of COVID policies through limited access to hospitals, health screening not happening, cancer treatments not happening in a timely manner, economic ruin driving people to make poor life choices and turning to alcohol, drugs or suicide as the solution to the problems dealt to them by COVID policies? …
What do we gain from these lockdowns, border closure policies? Between a certain death and a hypothetical risk, isn’t it better to choose the risk? The risk of living life. Why do you, our world leaders, continue to choose to keep us all locked within this eel trap of your own making?
Why don’t you make what is clearly, and backed by the science … the only sensible choice, of learning to live with COVID and allowing us to get back to living LIFE? …
Let’s dare to live with risk, as humans have done successfully since the dawn of time. We are at risk of jeopardizing the vast majority in the name of possibly protecting the few people who are at risk of serious illness or death from COVID.
And it is only ‘possibly protecting’ as even with these policies in place the risk of infection is still there and always will be. COVID is here now, and it is going nowhere, it is time we learned to LIVE with it.”
Bill and Melinda Gates’ fight against “disinformation” is really a fight against facts showing that the technocratic takeover is not an inevitable outcome of a global pandemic, but rather the result of a long-term well-planned effort.
If you haven’t taken steps to extricate yourself from their digital grasp as of yet, now’s the time to do it. For tips and guidance, see “Harvard Professor Exposes Surveillance Capitalism.”
Sources and References
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola


lewrockwell--2020-10-03--How Vaccine Makers Learned To Create Pseudo-Epidemics Like Covid-19. Why Covid-19 Will Never End

Hey , if the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic is a hoax as some claim , it would have to fool a lot of university-trained microbiologists .
But surprisingly this isn ’ t the first time modern medicine has been completely fooled by a pseudo epidemic .
Yes , the COVID-19 pandemic is fake , obviously much larger than the ones that preceded it , but totally fake .
How so , you ask ?
Mike Hearn , posting plan99.net clued the whole world in to how the polymerase chain reaction ( PCR ) test , now used to diagnose COVID-19 coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into mistakenly believing they were being besieged by a whooping cough epidemic in the years 2004-2007 .
Hearn ’ s report dated July 26 , 2020 was entitled : Pseudo-Epidemics : Why COVID-19 Is Guaranteed To Never End .
Few people paid attention to Hearn ’ s report that likened what happened during suspected infectious disease outbreaks at three major medical centers in Massachusetts , New Hampshire and Tennessee , to our modern-day COVID-19 calamity .
How Not to Die : Discov ... Stone , Gene Best Price : $ 8.10 Buy New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that COVID-19 is a hoax and you will be subjected to massive ridicule .
Lay people who have amateurishly claimed COVID-19 is a hoax have reportedly died of this infectious lung disease .
Government propagandists parade testimonies of those who thought COVID-19 was a hoax until they were infected themselves .
But these patients really don ’ t know they had a COVID-19 infection , they were just told that .
But there really IS a COVID-19 coronavirus that is killing hundreds of thousands of humans on planet earth , right ?
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when they were dealing with a lot coughing workers who obviously had something .
Well , a lot of people are dying of anything , ~8000 a day in the U.S. , ~150,000/day worldwide .
The question is , are they dying of COVID-19 ?
How do we know , after locking down entire populations inside their homes during winter cold and flu season that these excess death numbers aren ’ t a result of a lack of sunshine vitamin D rather than a corona cold virus ?
If it is not COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A Reuters Fact Checking team says in 92.8 % of deaths COVID-19 was “ found to be the underlying cause of death.
” But frankly , there is no study showing COVID-19 is singularly causal for death , at least not yet .
Strikingly , if prior pseudo-epidemics offer any lesson it is that the rate of false positive tests for COVID-19 approaches 100 % !
The How Not to Die Coo ... Stone , Gene Best Price : $ 13.23 Buy New $ 14.99 Back in 2007 a pseudo-epidemic broke out in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Healthcare workers starting coughing .
It was believed to be whooping cough .
It was the forerunner of the COVID-19 pandemic currently in play around the globe .
From it , vaccine makers learned how to create false demand for their shots like Big Pharma learned how to use a cholesterol test to sell statin drugs .
The need for a quick test The New York Times , in a report entitled “ Faith In Quick Test Leads To Epidemic That Wasn ’ t , ” reported on this pseudo epidemic in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ahead of what appeared to be a fast-developing whooping cough ( pertussis ) outbreak at the Dartmouth Medical Center in New Hampshire , said the NY Times report , almost 1,000 healthcare workers were tested , some were prescribed an antibiotic , immunized against whooping cough , and furloughed from work while they awaited test results .
Based upon symptoms and a positive PCR test , 142 workers were informed they likely had an infectious disease – pertussis .
Over 4,500 people ( 72 % of the medical staff ) were vaccinated .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ so infection control officers thought .
But wait .
Of 134 suspect cases of pertussis , 98 had been identified as pertussis by PCR test and 36 by classic symptoms .
But two weeks later , NONE resulted in a positive culture in a lab dish .
The Centers for Disease Control was called in to assist .
Re-testing found only 1 case that showed a moderate level of anti-pertussis antibodies .
Eight ( 8 ) -months after the alarm bell sounded that a whooping cough outbreak may be underway , an email @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It was all a false alarm .
No one had pertussis .
The error rate using PCR testing was 100 % !
How Not to Diet : The G ... Greger M.D .
FACLM , Mic ... Best Price : $ 10.30 Buy New $ 15.06 Modern medicine knows of this problem with PCR testing In the 2007 NY Times report Dr. Trish M Perl , an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins Medical Center , said pseudo-epidemics happen all the time .
“ It ’ s a problem .
We know it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what happened at Dartmouth is going to become more common.
” Dr. Perl went on to say : “ That leads to the question of why rely on them ( PCR tests ) at all.
” And here we are , thirteen years later with the world battling against a coronavirus outbreak confirmed by that same flawed PCR methodology .
Experts say , to quell the COVID-19 coronavirus and allow a safe reopening , 4.3 million tests per day will be required in the US alone .
Without the flawed tests , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths .
Stop the tests and you stop the demic .
It ’ s a scam-demic .
It ’ s not like modern medicine didn ’ t know anything about pseudo epidemics .
It knew where to look to learn how to create one .
If 100 % of the tests are “ not positive , ” then none of the deaths can be attributed to that particular virus .
So , what was it ?
The Miraculous Results ... Jeff T Bowles Best Price : $ 4.97 Buy New $ 9.99 If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was it ?
Well , it could have been a massive seasonal vitamin D deficiency among healthcare workers who largely spend time indoors and don ’ t get enough sunshine , the primary source of vitamin D in humans .
Low vitamin D levels are associated with chronic cough .
It could have been low vitamin B12 levels , more frequent among vegans , that are also associated with chronic cough .
It could also have been exposure to arsenic in drinking water or via arsenic-laden weed killers that have entered the food @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cough .
Up to 42 % of chronic cough cases remain unexplained .
That ’ s because anti-vitamin/pro-drug modern medicine doesn ’ t explore these plausible origins .
The advice given is to get a DPT ( diphtheria , pertussis/whooping cough , tetanus ) shot .
Modern medicine isn ’ t in the vitamin business .
And according to Morbidity & Mortality Reports , a publication of the Centers for Disease Control , prior pseudo epidemics in 2004 and 2006 were also reported at medical centers in Massachusetts and Tennessee as well .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is attempting to get ahead of a bacterial infection like this before it spreads throughout an entire medical center .
The standard way to confirm whooping cough is by culture growth in a lab dish , which takes time .
So , symptomology is initially used to make the diagnosis .
Slow culturing is 100 % specific for the pertussis bacterium but only , at best , 56 % sensitive .
Isolating pertussis and growing it in a lab dish may take 7-14 days .
The PCR Test is more rapid .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ widely adopted in 1997 and while the percentage of whooping cough cases confirmed by PCR rose from 12 % in 1997 to 44 % in 2005 , the percentage of cases confirmed by lab culture decreased from 52 % in 1997 to 20 % in 2005 .
Thereafter the number of culture-confirmed cases remained stable .
The number of culture-confirmed and PCR-confirmed cases should have matched the PCR numbers .
They didn ’ t .
Anyone with a chronic cough , sore throat , sneezing , runny nose could be on a conveyor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conclusion – you have whooping cough .
The MMWR report states : “ Outbreaks described in this report illustrate the limitations of relying solely on PCR assays to confirm pertussis.
” And the MMWR report makes another admission .
Thousands of healthcare workers were immunized but “ the effectiveness of vaccination in interrupting transmission of pertussis during an outbreak has not been established.
” There was no evidence vaccination would head off the whooping cough epidemic once it started .
Today the public hears that many COVID-19 infected patients are asymptomatic .
Many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That should cause health authorities to come to a conclusion there IS NO viral infection .
The CDC says : “ Testing asymptomatic persons should be avoided as it increases the likelihood of obtaining falsely-positive results.
” But the PCR test alone has somehow become the gold standard , no confirming symptoms needed .
Mike Hearn , referred to at the top of this report , writes : “ Just an 8 % false positive rate for COVID-19 in the USA would create a never-ending pseudo-epidemic of about 600 deaths per day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Just an 8 % false positive rate for COVID-19 in the USA would create a never-ending pseudo-epidemic of about 600 deaths per day being attributed to COVID-19 , forever.
” “ With the assumption more testing is needed to quell this pandemic a suppression target of 4.3 million tests per day has been established , or around 344,000 new fake cases per day even if the virus has entirely disappeared… Given current definitions , COVID-19 will never end ” says Hearn .
Hearn goes on to say : “ Health is run @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy over-reactions .
Lockdown-induced job losses won ’ t affect them , as they work for government .
‘ One rule for them and another for us ’ can ’ t be imagined.
” COVID-19 is the test .
The test is the disease .
With this circuitous reasoning , if you test positive for COVID-19 using the PCR test and you don ’ t have any symptoms , then you have an asymptomatic case of COVID-19 .
You can ’ t NOT have the disease .
If you test positive for COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t have any symptoms then you have an asymptomatic case of COVID-19 .
You can ’ t NOT have the disease .
Everybody who is being herded into testing will naively keep the planned-demic going .
Stop the testing and the pandemic vanishes .
Yes , ~8000 Americans die every day and many of them due to pneumonia , tuberculosis and other lung infections .
Yes , these deaths are horrid , drowning in your own lung fluid .
With a positive PCR test , these deaths will be attributed to COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mentioned above .
What about the money ?
Congress set aside $ 25 billion for testing .
Hospitals believe that money is theirs .
All they have to do is check the right box on the death certificate to get it .
Hospitals are now lobbying for the disease to be diagnosed solely on symptoms to make sure their cash cow continues .
Mike Hearn says : “ Public health England defines a COVID-19 death as anyone who has ever tested positive and then died , for any reason , at any time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the UK being supposedly one of the worst hit countries in the world – – is a statistical fantasy.
” What does the White House know ?
President Trump must know something .
For unexplained reasons , the Trump Administration plans to end funding for coronavirus testing .
The President can ’ t come out directly and say the whole COVID-19 pandemic is fake .
The scientific community would aggregately slaughter him .
The news media would feast on that .
On September 16 President Trump repeatedly said ( 34 times at one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The people have the control but they will remain under the deception of the misinformation networks via their propaganda-viewing screens , aka television , that is controlling the narratives .
What if nobody shows up for the tests ?
In an irony , the masses are supposed to stay locked-down at home , but are allowed to come out of their caves for the test .
I suggest buying sunlamps after watching what authorities in Australia are doing to restrict freedom of movement of their population .
Dernit .
UV-free “ sun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t make any vitamin D. Maybe get a UV-emitting light bulb ( make sure you protect your eyes if you use these lamps and don ’ t over-do it ) .
For the sun-sensitive ( e.g .
red hair , fair skin ) , take 25 milligrams of beta carotene/day and your skin won ’ t burn or wrinkle .
Maybe vitamin D pills are a better idea .

Hey, if the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic is a hoax as some claim, it would have to fool a lot of university-trained microbiologists. But surprisingly this isn’t the first time modern medicine has been completely fooled by a pseudo epidemic. Yes, the COVID-19 pandemic is fake, obviously much larger than the ones that preceded it, but totally fake. How so, you ask?
Mike Hearn, posting plan99.net clued the whole world in to how the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, now used to diagnose COVID-19 coronavirus infections, fooled three major medical centers into mistakenly believing they were being besieged by a whooping cough epidemic in the years 2004-2007.
Hearn’s report dated July 26, 2020 was entitled: Pseudo-Epidemics: Why COVID-19 Is Guaranteed To Never End. Few people paid attention to Hearn’s report that likened what happened during suspected infectious disease outbreaks at three major medical centers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Tennessee, to our modern-day COVID-19 calamity. How Not to Die: Discov... Stone, Gene Best Price: $8.10 Buy New $14.52 (as of 05:53 UTC - Details)
Post up an online claim that COVID-19 is a hoax and you will be subjected to massive ridicule. Lay people who have amateurishly claimed COVID-19 is a hoax have reportedly died of this infectious lung disease. Government propagandists parade testimonies of those who thought COVID-19 was a hoax until they were infected themselves. But these patients really don’t know they had a COVID-19 infection, they were just told that.
But there really IS a COVID-19 coronavirus that is killing hundreds of thousands of humans on planet earth, right? That’s what infection control officers thought when they were dealing with a lot coughing workers who obviously had something.
Well, a lot of people are dying of anything, ~8000 a day in the U.S., ~150,000/day worldwide. The question is, are they dying of COVID-19?
How do we know, after locking down entire populations inside their homes during winter cold and flu season that these excess death numbers aren’t a result of a lack of sunshine vitamin D rather than a corona cold virus?
If it is not COVID-19, what else could it be?
A Reuters Fact Checking team says in 92.8% of deaths COVID-19 was “found to be the underlying cause of death.” But frankly, there is no study showing COVID-19 is singularly causal for death, at least not yet.
Strikingly, if prior pseudo-epidemics offer any lesson it is that the rate of false positive tests for COVID-19 approaches 100%!
Vaccine makers in search of a test
The How Not to Die Coo... Stone, Gene Best Price: $13.23 Buy New $14.99 (as of 05:53 UTC - Details) Back in 2007 a pseudo-epidemic broke out in a major medical center in the US. Healthcare workers starting coughing. It was believed to be whooping cough. It was the forerunner of the COVID-19 pandemic currently in play around the globe. From it, vaccine makers learned how to create false demand for their shots like Big Pharma learned how to use a cholesterol test to sell statin drugs.
The need for a quick test
The New York Times, in a report entitled “Faith In Quick Test Leads To Epidemic That Wasn’t,” reported on this pseudo epidemic in 2007.
In an attempt to get ahead of what appeared to be a fast-developing whooping cough (pertussis) outbreak at the Dartmouth Medical Center in New Hampshire, said the NY Times report, almost 1,000 healthcare workers were tested, some were prescribed an antibiotic, immunized against whooping cough, and furloughed from work while they awaited test results.
Based upon symptoms and a positive PCR test, 142 workers were informed they likely had an infectious disease – pertussis. Over 4,500 people (72% of the medical staff) were vaccinated. The med-center-demic had been quelled. Or so infection control officers thought.
But wait. Of 134 suspect cases of pertussis, 98 had been identified as pertussis by PCR test and 36 by classic symptoms. But two weeks later, NONE resulted in a positive culture in a lab dish.
The Centers for Disease Control was called in to assist. Re-testing found only 1 case that showed a moderate level of anti-pertussis antibodies.
False alarm
Eight (8)-months after the alarm bell sounded that a whooping cough outbreak may be underway, an email was sent to all parties involved. It was all a false alarm. No one had pertussis. The error rate using PCR testing was 100%! How Not to Diet: The G... Greger M.D. FACLM, Mic... Best Price: $10.30 Buy New $15.06 (as of 05:53 UTC - Details)
Modern medicine knows of this problem with PCR testing
In the 2007 NY Times report Dr. Trish M Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins Medical Center, said pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. “It’s a problem. We know it’s a problem. My guess is that what happened at Dartmouth is going to become more common.”
Dr. Perl went on to say: “That leads to the question of why rely on them (PCR tests) at all.”
And here we are, thirteen years later with the world battling against a coronavirus outbreak confirmed by that same flawed PCR methodology.
Experts say, to quell the COVID-19 coronavirus and allow a safe reopening, 4.3 million tests per day will be required in the US alone. Without the flawed tests, there are deaths, but no confirmed coronavirus-associated deaths. Stop the tests and you stop the demic.
It’s a scam-demic. It’s not like modern medicine didn’t know anything about pseudo epidemics. It knew where to look to learn how to create one. If 100% of the tests are “not positive,” then none of the deaths can be attributed to that particular virus.
So, what was it?
The Miraculous Results... Bowles, Jeff T Best Price: $4.25 Buy New $6.99 (as of 01:50 UTC - Details) If it wasn’t pertussis, what was it? Well, it could have been a massive seasonal vitamin D deficiency among healthcare workers who largely spend time indoors and don’t get enough sunshine, the primary source of vitamin D in humans. Low vitamin D levels are associated with chronic cough.
It could have been low vitamin B12 levels, more frequent among vegans, that are also associated with chronic cough.
It could also have been exposure to arsenic in drinking water or via arsenic-laden weed killers that have entered the food chain, that can induce a chronic cough.
Up to 42% of chronic cough cases remain unexplained. That’s because anti-vitamin/pro-drug modern medicine doesn’t explore these plausible origins.
The advice given is to get a DPT (diphtheria, pertussis/whooping cough, tetanus) shot. Modern medicine isn’t in the vitamin business.
And according to Morbidity & Mortality Reports, a publication of the Centers for Disease Control, prior pseudo epidemics in 2004 and 2006 were also reported at medical centers in Massachusetts and Tennessee as well.
Time is of the essence
The problem is attempting to get ahead of a bacterial infection like this before it spreads throughout an entire medical center. The standard way to confirm whooping cough is by culture growth in a lab dish, which takes time. So, symptomology is initially used to make the diagnosis. Slow culturing is 100% specific for the pertussis bacterium but only, at best, 56% sensitive. Isolating pertussis and growing it in a lab dish may take 7-14 days. The PCR Test is more rapid.
As MMWR reports, the PCR test was widely adopted in 1997 and while the percentage of whooping cough cases confirmed by PCR rose from 12% in 1997 to 44% in 2005, the percentage of cases confirmed by lab culture decreased from 52% in 1997 to 20% in 2005. Thereafter the number of culture-confirmed cases remained stable.
The number of culture-confirmed and PCR-confirmed cases should have matched the PCR numbers. They didn’t. Anyone with a chronic cough, sore throat, sneezing, runny nose could be on a conveyor belt that can only come to one conclusion – you have whooping cough.
The MMWR report states: “Outbreaks described in this report illustrate the limitations of relying solely on PCR assays to confirm pertussis.”
And the MMWR report makes another admission. Thousands of healthcare workers were immunized but “the effectiveness of vaccination in interrupting transmission of pertussis during an outbreak has not been established.” There was no evidence vaccination would head off the whooping cough epidemic once it started.
Asymptomatic cases, you say
Today the public hears that many COVID-19 infected patients are asymptomatic. Many never show a rise in antiviral antibodies. That should cause health authorities to come to a conclusion there IS NO viral infection. The CDC says: “Testing asymptomatic persons should be avoided as it increases the likelihood of obtaining falsely-positive results.” But the PCR test alone has somehow become the gold standard, no confirming symptoms needed.
Mike Hearn, referred to at the top of this report, writes: “Just an 8% false positive rate for COVID-19 in the USA would create a never-ending pseudo-epidemic of about 600 deaths per day being attributed to COVID-19, forever.
“Just an 8% false positive rate for COVID-19
in the USA would create a never-ending
pseudo-epidemic of about 600 deaths per day
being attributed to COVID-19, forever.”
More testing, more testing!
“With the assumption more testing is needed to quell this pandemic a suppression target of 4.3 million tests per day has been established, or around 344,000 new fake cases per day even if the virus has entirely disappeared… Given current definitions, COVID-19 will never end” says Hearn.
Hearn goes on to say: “Health is run by people who suffer no consequences from policy over-reactions. Lockdown-induced job losses won’t affect them, as they work for government. ‘One rule for them and another for us’ can’t be imagined.”
Circuitous reasoning
COVID-19 is the test. The test is the disease. With this circuitous reasoning, if you test positive for COVID-19 using the PCR test and you don’t have any symptoms, then you have an asymptomatic case of COVID-19. You can’t NOT have the disease.
If you test positive for COVID-19 using the
PCR test and you don’t have any symptoms
then you have an asymptomatic case of COVID-19. You can’t NOT have the disease.
Everybody who is being herded into testing will naively keep the planned-demic going. Stop the testing and the pandemic vanishes. Yes, ~8000 Americans die every day and many of them due to pneumonia, tuberculosis and other lung infections. Yes, these deaths are horrid, drowning in your own lung fluid. With a positive PCR test, these deaths will be attributed to COVID-19, just like the whooping cough cases mentioned above.
What about the money?
Congress set aside $25 billion for testing. Hospitals believe that money is theirs. All they have to do is check the right box on the death certificate to get it. Hospitals are now lobbying for the disease to be diagnosed solely on symptoms to make sure their cash cow continues.
Mike Hearn says: “Public health England defines a COVID-19 death as anyone who has ever tested positive and then died, for any reason, at any time i.e. (the idea that) the UK being supposedly one of the worst hit countries in the world – –
is a statistical fantasy.”
What does the White House know?
President Trump must know something. For unexplained reasons, the Trump Administration plans to end funding for coronavirus testing. The President can’t come out directly and say the whole COVID-19 pandemic is fake. The scientific community would aggregately slaughter him. The news media would feast on that. On September 16 President Trump repeatedly said (34 times at one press conference) the virus will disappear.
The people have the control but they will remain under the deception of the misinformation networks via their propaganda-viewing screens, aka television, that is controlling the narratives.
What if nobody shows up for the tests? In an irony, the masses are supposed to stay locked-down at home, but are allowed to come out of their caves for the test.
I suggest buying sunlamps after watching what authorities in Australia are doing to restrict freedom of movement of their population. Dernit. UV-free “sun” lamps are being featured. They don’t make any vitamin D. Maybe get a UV-emitting light bulb (make sure you protect your eyes if you use these lamps and don’t over-do it). For the sun-sensitive (e.g. red hair, fair skin), take 25 milligrams of beta carotene/day and your skin won’t burn or wrinkle. Maybe vitamin D pills are a better idea.


lewrockwell--2020-10-03--The Political Spectrum: The Correct Delineation

If we want to navigate through complex territory , we need an accurate map .
If we do not have a good map , we are likely to get lost .
If we want to understand the political landscape , we need a sound paradigm by which to orientate ourselves .
If we do not have a good paradigm , we are likely to lose our bearing and make wrong judgments .
One of the reasons why so much of our political discourse is so confounding and unfruitful is because our paradigm is faulty .
The left-right map we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is incorrect .
It depicts the political spectrum as populated on the far left by hardline communists and socialists such as Lenin , Stalin , Castro .
On the other end – on the far right – we have fascists like Hitler and Mussolini .
These two camps stand on the opposite extremes and in between there is everyone else .
In this model , the American Democrats are left of center while the Republicans are right of center .
Here is how you can quickly see there something wrong with this paradigm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and big government totalitarians whose ideological underpinnings had their roots in the teachings of Karl Marx ( see here about Hitler ’ s socialism ) .
But if these two delineate the whole length of the political spectrum , where , then , do we fit limited government types such classical liberals or today ’ s libertarians ?
In the conventional understanding , there is really no place for them .
Below is the political spectrum drawn in a way that encompasses the full width of the political landscape .
In this paradigm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ degree of statism intended and aspired to by various political actors and ideologies .
Thus , on the extreme left you have statist totalitarians while on the opposite side you have non-statists and state minimalists .
With the corrected paradigm , we now easily find a proper place for classical liberals and libertarians .
At the same time , Hitler – a Nazi socialist who built a powerful German state – is placed where he belongs on the left side , somewhat downstream from full-out statists like Stalin , Lenin or Castro .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , W. Cleon Buy New $ 17.89 Some observations on the correctly delineated spectrum We now see that the conventional paradigm only presents the left portion of the spectrum and not the whole extent of it .
This misunderstanding has been consciously planted and cultivated by the left which had several good reasons for propagating this distortion .
Their first concern was to distance themselves from Hitler , their socialist brother .
We explained earlier how they were able to pull it off : “ What gave the leftists a cover for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nationalism which he superimposed on his socialist underpinnings .
This muddied the waters just enough to make the lie possible .
The truth , however , remains that fundamentally Hitler was your standard socialist.
” The obfuscation enabled leftists appear to be removed from or even opposite of Hitler .
This was a masterstroke of propaganda given that Hitler is their ideological bedfellow .
We have shown previously how the two share fundamental inclinations in the Ideological Pedigree Table of Values and Views .
As such , they stand shoulder to shoulder on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leader whose socialism was mixed with strong elements of racism and nationalism .
Today ’ s Democratic party – which has been recently taken over by its radical elements – is a present-day version of the Nazis in the American context .
Both are socialists who are strongly racist and nationalistic .
The only difference is the target of their racism – whites vs Jews – and the direction of their nationalism : negative vs positive ( for more detailed treatment of this see here ) .
The left ’ s inversion of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advantage of placing their ideological opponents – those advocating a more limited state – on the same half of the spectrum as Hitler thus creating an appearance of affinity even though in reality they are opposites .
The Naked Socialist Skousen , Paul B .
Best Price : $ 25.82 Buy New $ 24.95 By placing themselves close to the center , leftists have managed to make themselves look moderate and reasonable .
Their feigned modesty was designed to increase their appeal to the common man for whom they purport to care .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the truth .
The moment leftists gain power they make life miserable for the very people they claim to champion .
Just ask the workers of the Soviet Union , Hitler ’ s German Volk , Mao ’ s peasants or the people of Cuba how good and pleasant was life under their leftist rulers .
On the most fundamental level , a leftist is someone who advocates state control over the means of production .
This control can be complete or partial .
It can be in the form of direct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ownership through state-mandated entities or agents .
Control over the means of production can also be achieved through various forms of legislative , administrative and regulatory mechanisms .
The degree of control intended determines where on the left side of the spectrum one stands .
The left side of the political spectrum can be broadly divided into two parts : the hard left and the soft left .
The line of demarcation is not always sharply defined .
Hard leftists advocate complete or near-complete socialization of the economy and a powerful centralized state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a less statist arrangement .
The hard left is always made up of either actual or potential totalitarians and murderers .
To the soft left belong , for the most part , the self-serving bunglers .
Division of the political left into two zones It is impossible to exercise a significant measure of control over the means of production without becoming authoritarian .
This is because such control goes against the natural flow of things .
To achieve it , you need coercion and violence ( or at least the explicit threat of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of control you seek , the more authoritarian you must become .
Complete or near complete control requires one to become a totalitarian .
Such a high level of state control over the means of production can only be implemented through mass murder .
This has been the case in every country where such control has been achieved ( see The Black Book of Communism ) .
It is a kind of Faustian bargain : you gain power and control but in return you have to sell your soul , i.e.
, you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Apparently , certain types do it quite gladly .
Socialists are leftists .
The terms socialist and leftist can be used interchangeably although only in a rough and imprecise way .
There have been many different modes and varieties of socialism – both attempted in practice and formulated as theories – and this term is very difficult to define .
Even socialists themselves do not agree on what socialism actually means or entails and there are constant arguments and infighting among them .
Given the lack of definitional clarity in regard to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ productive to use the term leftist instead Masters Of Deceit : The ... Hoover , J. Edgar Buy New $ 7.99 .
On the hard left you have traditional communists and far left socialists including the Nazis .
On the soft left you would have the post-war western European socialist and labor parties .
Today ’ s GOP and the Conservative Party in Great Britain also belong to the right side of the soft left .
Political parties are not permanently fixed at one position on the spectrum ; they tend to move @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on which faction controls them at any given time .
We have seen an instance of a fairly dramatic move recently in the US where the Democratic Party has been taken over by the extreme elements within its ranks and consequently lurched sharply leftward .
As it currently stands , the US Democratic Party is a hard left party controlled by left-wing extremists and it behaves accordingly .
For example , its highest officials openly encourage rioting , violence and destruction of cities while deliberately tying the hands of law enforcement and shielding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this is the Democratic vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris who praised Black Lives Matter as “ brilliant.
” As you may know , BLM is a revolutionary outfit founded by Marxists .
The riots that have torn America apart and caused billions of dollars in damage have been conducted under the auspices of BLM , which has launched this destructive movement under the false pretenses of systemic racism .
Senator Harris ’ s praise of BLM comes on the heels of her June interview in which she openly called on BLM and their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is what she said : “ Everyone beware because they ’ re not gon na stop .
They ’ re not gon na stop before election day in November , and they ’ re not going to stop after election day .
And everyone should take note of that… they ’ re not going to let up—and they should not .
And we should not.
” Please note that this statement was not made by some fringe anarchist .
This is incitement to lawlessness , violence and anarchy is coming from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Also please notice Harris ’ use of the pronoun “ we.
” This is an explicit acknowledgement that Democrats on the highest levels approve of and are part of this violent criminal movement .
Not to be outdone , and in keeping with the tried-and-true tactics of the hard left , Hillary Clinton , former Democratic nominee for president , has called on Democrats – in direct subversion of the democratic process – not to concede the upcoming election “ under any circumstances.
” This is how she put it : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circumstances , because I think this is gon na drag out and eventually I do believe he will win if we don ’ t give an inch.
” Hillary Clinton ’ s stance is indicative of the present dynamic within the Democratic party .
Having begun as a leftist radical in the 60s , Clinton became in her ripe age a hardened establishment politician for whom considerations of power and money took precedence over her youthful socialist ideals .
Her transformation was so complete that she eventually became something of a neocon .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ high-level Republican operatives voted for her over Donald Trump in the 2016 elections .
But with the recent capture of her Party by its radical elements , Hillary Clinton – in an apparent effort to remain relevant internally – has moved sharply leftward , closer toward her youthful roots .
As a proper radical , she now openly advocates the subversion of democracy and election theft .
It would not be at all surprising if one of these days she goes all out and begins speaking of “ Revolution.
” This is truly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrived at a point in her life where she could at least attempt to bring some sanity and moral sense into the situation .
She could try to position herself the Grand Dame of the Democratic Party and condemn the criminal behavior of the democrat mobs who are ravaging and terrorizing this country .
But rather than doing what is right and decent , she is pouring more vitriol on the fire .
Both Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton know exactly what they are doing .
With the left ’ s ugly nature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are going to lose electorally , but this does not discourage them in any way .
They will instead try to gain power by other means .
After all , the hard left has rarely come into power via the democratic process .
The reason for this is quite simple : people generally grasp that despite their rhetoric there is something deeply wrong with these leaders and their twisted programs .
As a result , socialists and communists almost invariably seize power through undemocratic means such as coup d ’ états , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and such .
These high-level Democratic politicians behave exactly like the Nazi and Bolshevik operatives did in their time .
In a repeat of history , their gangs of looting followers on the streets of America are the equivalent of Hitler ’ s Brown Shirts and Lenin ’ s red mobs .
The Devil and Karl Mar ... Kengor , Paul Best Price : $ 39.90 Buy New $ 26.96 People who gravitate toward the hard left are usually driven there by the dark impulses of their psyches which they seek to discharge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ true in the past and it is also true now .
Many of the far-left leaders have been narcissist psychopaths with little or no empathy for fellow human beings .
These days you can observe the connection between psychological disturbance and far left activism when you watch the woke and progressives in action .
The vast majority of them are clearly troubled individuals .
They are usually highly self-absorbed , angry and emotionally disturbed .
You can watch a telling video of a liberal woman having a meltdown over the death Ruth Bader @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is what she shrieks in part : “ Holy f—king shit , you guys !
I am driving the car but I just go a notification that Ruth Bader Ginsberg died !
F-ck !
Could this year get any f-cking worse ?
!
The woman then howls and shakes as if she were possessed .
If you watch the video , you will notice that she is not actually upset about the death of a human being but about the fact that Ruth Bader Ginsburg did not manage to hang on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deprived of the opportunity to nominate her replacement before the election .
“ Ruth , ” she screams wildly , “ you just had to make it to 2021 !
” Needless to say , the woman looks better adjusted than most of her ideological compadres these days .
Apart from the obvious lack of empathy , many among the woke also exhibit sexual abnormalities of various kinds such as homosexual behavior or thinking that they belong to the opposite biological sex ( a condition known as gender dysphoria ) .
Some woke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one hundred types of gender .
When the British TV show host Piers Morgan challenged this idea late last year the woke launched a campaign to have him cancelled .
These days you can find these cancel types at the ongoing BLM riots where they shout and scream about a problem that does not exist .
Needless to say , these types are angry , intolerant , unloving and vindictive .
They are ever ready to cancel and destroy anyone who disagrees or opposes them .
They exhibit the same tendencies that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of free speech , proclivity toward violence , suppression of dissent , racism , atheism , dehumanization of opponents , accusations of thought crimes , intimidation of dissenters , etc .
Should they obtain the power they so feverishly seek , they will undoubtedly use it in the same cruel ways their ideological brothers have always done .
The Best of Vasko Kohlmayer

If we want to navigate through complex territory, we need an accurate map. If we do not have a good map, we are likely to get lost. If we want to understand the political landscape, we need a sound paradigm by which to orientate ourselves. If we do not have a good paradigm, we are likely to lose our bearing and make wrong judgments. One of the reasons why so much of our political discourse is so confounding and unfruitful is because our paradigm is faulty.
The left-right map we have been given to navigate the political landscape is incorrect. It depicts the political spectrum as populated on the far left by hardline communists and socialists such as Lenin, Stalin, Castro. On the other end – on the far right – we have fascists like Hitler and Mussolini. These two camps stand on the opposite extremes and in between there is everyone else. In this model, the American Democrats are left of center while the Republicans are right of center.
Incorrect: Conventional understanding of the political spectrum
Here is how you can quickly see there something wrong with this paradigm: both Stalin and Hitler were socialists and big government totalitarians whose ideological underpinnings had their roots in the teachings of Karl Marx (see here about Hitler’s socialism). But if these two delineate the whole length of the political spectrum, where, then, do we fit limited government types such classical liberals or today’s libertarians? In the conventional understanding, there is really no place for them.
Below is the political spectrum drawn in a way that encompasses the full width of the political landscape.
Correct delineation of the political spectrum
In this paradigm, the spectrum is delineated by the degree of statism intended and aspired to by various political actors and ideologies. Thus, on the extreme left you have statist totalitarians while on the opposite side you have non-statists and state minimalists.
Actors on the political spectrum
With the corrected paradigm, we now easily find a proper place for classical liberals and libertarians. At the same time, Hitler – a Nazi socialist who built a powerful German state – is placed where he belongs on the left side, somewhat downstream from full-out statists like Stalin, Lenin or Castro. The Naked Communist: E... Skousen, W. Cleon Buy New $17.89 (as of 04:16 UTC - Details)
Some observations on the correctly delineated spectrum
We now see that the conventional paradigm only presents the left portion of the spectrum and not the whole extent of it. This misunderstanding has been consciously planted and cultivated by the left which had several good reasons for propagating this distortion. Their first concern was to distance themselves from Hitler, their socialist brother. We explained earlier how they were able to pull it off: “What gave the leftists a cover for their obfuscation was Hitler’s racism and nationalism which he superimposed on his socialist underpinnings. This muddied the waters just enough to make the lie possible. The truth, however, remains that fundamentally Hitler was your standard socialist.”
The obfuscation enabled leftists appear to be removed from or even opposite of Hitler. This was a masterstroke of propaganda given that Hitler is their ideological bedfellow. We have shown previously how the two share fundamental inclinations in the Ideological Pedigree Table of Values and Views. As such, they stand shoulder to shoulder on the political spectrum. Hitler was a leader whose socialism was mixed with strong elements of racism and nationalism. Today’s Democratic party – which has been recently taken over by its radical elements – is a present-day version of the Nazis in the American context. Both are socialists who are strongly racist and nationalistic. The only difference is the target of their racism – whites vs Jews – and the direction of their nationalism: negative vs positive (for more detailed treatment of this see here).
The left’s inversion of the political paradigm has had the further advantage of placing their ideological opponents – those advocating a more limited state – on the same half of the spectrum as Hitler thus creating an appearance of affinity even though in reality they are opposites.
The Naked Socialist Skousen, Paul B. Best Price: $25.82 Buy New $24.95 (as of 03:32 UTC - Details) By placing themselves close to the center, leftists have managed to make themselves look moderate and reasonable. Their feigned modesty was designed to increase their appeal to the common man for whom they purport to care. Nothing, however, could be further from the truth. The moment leftists gain power they make life miserable for the very people they claim to champion. Just ask the workers of the Soviet Union, Hitler’s German Volk, Mao’s peasants or the people of Cuba how good and pleasant was life under their leftist rulers.
On the most fundamental level, a leftist is someone who advocates state control over the means of production. This control can be complete or partial. It can be in the form of direct ownership by the state or by indirect ownership through state-mandated entities or agents. Control over the means of production can also be achieved through various forms of legislative, administrative and regulatory mechanisms. The degree of control intended determines where on the left side of the spectrum one stands.
The left side of the political spectrum can be broadly divided into two parts: the hard left and the soft left. The line of demarcation is not always sharply defined. Hard leftists advocate complete or near-complete socialization of the economy and a powerful centralized state. Moderate or soft leftists strive for a less statist arrangement. The hard left is always made up of either actual or potential totalitarians and murderers. To the soft left belong, for the most part, the self-serving bunglers.
Division of the political left into two zones
It is impossible to exercise a significant measure of control over the means of production without becoming authoritarian. This is because such control goes against the natural flow of things. To achieve it, you need coercion and violence (or at least the explicit threat of it). The greater the degree of control you seek, the more authoritarian you must become. Complete or near complete control requires one to become a totalitarian. Such a high level of state control over the means of production can only be implemented through mass murder. This has been the case in every country where such control has been achieved (see The Black Book of Communism). It is a kind of Faustian bargain: you gain power and control but in return you have to sell your soul, i.e., you must oppress, coerce and kill. Apparently, certain types do it quite gladly.
Socialists are leftists. The terms socialist and leftist can be used interchangeably although only in a rough and imprecise way. There have been many different modes and varieties of socialism – both attempted in practice and formulated as theories – and this term is very difficult to define. Even socialists themselves do not agree on what socialism actually means or entails and there are constant arguments and infighting among them. Given the lack of definitional clarity in regard to the term socialism, it is generally more productive to use the term leftist instead Masters Of Deceit: The... Hoover, J. Edgar Buy New $7.99 (as of 05:22 UTC - Details) .
On the hard left you have traditional communists and far left socialists including the Nazis. On the soft left you would have the post-war western European socialist and labor parties. Today’s GOP and the Conservative Party in Great Britain also belong to the right side of the soft left. Political parties are not permanently fixed at one position on the spectrum; they tend to move and shift within a certain range depending on which faction controls them at any given time. We have seen an instance of a fairly dramatic move recently in the US where the Democratic Party has been taken over by the extreme elements within its ranks and consequently lurched sharply leftward. As it currently stands, the US Democratic Party is a hard left party controlled by left-wing extremists and it behaves accordingly. For example, its highest officials openly encourage rioting, violence and destruction of cities while deliberately tying the hands of law enforcement and shielding perpetrators from persecution. The latest instance of this is the Democratic vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris who praised Black Lives Matter as “brilliant.”
As you may know, BLM is a revolutionary outfit founded by Marxists. The riots that have torn America apart and caused billions of dollars in damage have been conducted under the auspices of BLM, which has launched this destructive movement under the false pretenses of systemic racism. Senator Harris’s praise of BLM comes on the heels of her June interview in which she openly called on BLM and their collaborators to continue the violence and destruction. This is what she said:
“Everyone beware because they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop before election day in November, and they’re not going to stop after election day. And everyone should take note of that… they’re not going to let up—and they should not. And we should not.”
Please note that this statement was not made by some fringe anarchist. This is incitement to lawlessness, violence and anarchy is coming from the highest echelons of the Democratic party. Also please notice Harris’ use of the pronoun “we.” This is an explicit acknowledgement that Democrats on the highest levels approve of and are part of this violent criminal movement.
Not to be outdone, and in keeping with the tried-and-true tactics of the hard left, Hillary Clinton, former Democratic nominee for president, has called on Democrats – in direct subversion of the democratic process – not to concede the upcoming election “under any circumstances.” This is how she put it:
“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances, because I think this is gonna drag out and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch.”
Hillary Clinton’s stance is indicative of the present dynamic within the Democratic party. Having begun as a leftist radical in the 60s, Clinton became in her ripe age a hardened establishment politician for whom considerations of power and money took precedence over her youthful socialist ideals. Her transformation was so complete that she eventually became something of a neocon. So much so that a number of high-level Republican operatives voted for her over Donald Trump in the 2016 elections. But with the recent capture of her Party by its radical elements, Hillary Clinton – in an apparent effort to remain relevant internally – has moved sharply leftward, closer toward her youthful roots. As a proper radical, she now openly advocates the subversion of democracy and election theft. It would not be at all surprising if one of these days she goes all out and begins speaking of “Revolution.” This is truly a pity, because Mrs. Clinton has arrived at a point in her life where she could at least attempt to bring some sanity and moral sense into the situation. She could try to position herself the Grand Dame of the Democratic Party and condemn the criminal behavior of the democrat mobs who are ravaging and terrorizing this country. But rather than doing what is right and decent, she is pouring more vitriol on the fire.
Both Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton know exactly what they are doing. With the left’s ugly nature now on full display, they sense they are going to lose electorally, but this does not discourage them in any way. They will instead try to gain power by other means. After all, the hard left has rarely come into power via the democratic process. The reason for this is quite simple: people generally grasp that despite their rhetoric there is something deeply wrong with these leaders and their twisted programs. As a result, socialists and communists almost invariably seize power through undemocratic means such as coup d’états, insurrections, parliamentary coups, election theft and such. These high-level Democratic politicians behave exactly like the Nazi and Bolshevik operatives did in their time. In a repeat of history, their gangs of looting followers on the streets of America are the equivalent of Hitler’s Brown Shirts and Lenin’s red mobs. The Devil and Karl Mar... Kengor, Paul Best Price: $39.90 Buy New $26.96 (as of 04:44 UTC - Details)
People who gravitate toward the hard left are usually driven there by the dark impulses of their psyches which they seek to discharge through political activism. This has been true in the past and it is also true now. Many of the far-left leaders have been narcissist psychopaths with little or no empathy for fellow human beings. These days you can observe the connection between psychological disturbance and far left activism when you watch the woke and progressives in action.
The vast majority of them are clearly troubled individuals. They are usually highly self-absorbed, angry and emotionally disturbed. You can watch a telling video of a liberal woman having a meltdown over the death Ruth Bader Ginsburg while driving in a car. This is what she shrieks in part:
“Holy f—king shit, you guys! I am driving the car but I just go a notification that Ruth Bader Ginsberg died! F-ck! Could this year get any f-cking worse?!
The woman then howls and shakes as if she were possessed. If you watch the video, you will notice that she is not actually upset about the death of a human being but about the fact that Ruth Bader Ginsburg did not manage to hang on a little longer so that Trump would be deprived of the opportunity to nominate her replacement before the election. “Ruth,” she screams wildly, “you just had to make it to 2021!”
Needless to say, the woman looks better adjusted than most of her ideological compadres these days. Apart from the obvious lack of empathy, many among the woke also exhibit sexual abnormalities of various kinds such as homosexual behavior or thinking that they belong to the opposite biological sex (a condition known as gender dysphoria). Some woke activists even claim there are more than one hundred types of gender. When the British TV show host Piers Morgan challenged this idea late last year the woke launched a campaign to have him cancelled. These days you can find these cancel types at the ongoing BLM riots where they shout and scream about a problem that does not exist.
Needless to say, these types are angry, intolerant, unloving and vindictive. They are ever ready to cancel and destroy anyone who disagrees or opposes them.
They exhibit the same tendencies that the hard left has always displayed: hatred of free speech, proclivity toward violence, suppression of dissent, racism, atheism, dehumanization of opponents, accusations of thought crimes, intimidation of dissenters, etc. Should they obtain the power they so feverishly seek, they will undoubtedly use it in the same cruel ways their ideological brothers have always done.
The Best of Vasko Kohlmayer