lewrockwell--2020-12-08--Vitamin D Reduces Cancer Deaths

Vitamin D Reduces Cancer Deaths

There ’ s good news for those of you who have taken the proactive step to make sure your vitamin D level is optimized .
Several recent studies demonstrate vitamin D can have a significantly beneficial impact on your cancer risk , both in terms of preventing cancer and in the treatment of cancer .
In the first of these studies,1,2 which included 25,871 patients , vitamin D supplementation was found to reduce the risk for metastatic cancer and death by 17 % .
The risk was reduced by as much as 38 % among those who also maintained a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poorly done study as they only gave participants 2,000 IUs a day and never measured their blood levels .
Had there been no improvement , I would not have been surprised , but the fact is it still reduced metastatic cancer and death by 17 % , and they found significant benefit among those who were not obese .
The Optimal Dose : Rest ... Judson Somerville MD Best Price : $ 9.96 Buy New $ 9.98 This is pretty extraordinary but not as good as epidemiological studies that show a 50 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D sufficient people , as suggested in a study further below .
That said , UPI reported the results saying:3 The study , published in JAMA Network Open , is a secondary analysis of the VITAL Study4 which , in part , sought to determine whether taking 2,000 IUs of vitamin D per day would reduce the risk of cancer , heart disease or stroke in people who did not have a prior history of these diseases .
The VITAL study itself , which followed patients for an average of 5.3 years , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rates among those who took vitamin D3 , but there was a reduction in cancer-related deaths , which is what prompted this secondary analysis .
The fact that patients with a healthy weight derived a much greater benefit — a 38 % reduced risk for metastatic cancer and death compared to 17 % overall — suggests your body weight may play a significant role in whether vitamin D supplementation will provide you with the anticancer benefits you seek .
According to study co-author Dr. Paulette Chandler , assistant professor of medicine at Brigham @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ Our study highlights that obesity may confer resistance to vitamin D effects.
” 5 There may be something to that .
Research6 published in 2010 found that dietary fructose inhibits intestinal calcium absorption , thereby inducing vitamin D insufficiency in people with chronic kidney disease .
That said , vitamin D tends to be lower in obese people in general , for the fact that it ’ s a fat-soluble nutrient and when you ’ re obese , the vitamin D ends up being “ volumetrically diluted.
” As explained in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” published in 2017:7 While that particular paper stresses that lower vitamin D in obese individuals might not mean that they ’ re deficient , others disagree .
For example , one study8,9 found that for every 10 % increase in body-mass index , there ’ s a 4.2 % reduction in blood levels of vitamin D. According to the authors of that particular study , obesity may in fact be a causal factor in the development of vitamin D deficiency.10 A scientific review11 published in the September 2020 issue of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ low vitamin D is associated with poor colorectal cancer survival .
The Vitamin D Solution ... Michael F. Holick Best Price : $ 2.01 Buy New $ 9.08 To assess whether vitamin D supplementation might improve survival in these patients , they reviewed the findings of seven trials , three of which included patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer from the outset and four population trials that reported survival in incident cases .
Overall , the meta-analysis found supplementation resulted in a 30 % reduction in adverse colorectal cancer outcomes .
Vitamin D also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colorectal cancer .
According to the authors:12 Another review and meta-analysis,13 this one published in November 2019 in Bioscience Reports , looked at vitamin D supplementation on cancer incidence and mortality in general .
Ten randomized controlled trials with a pool of 81,362 participants were included in the analysis .
While the incidence rate of cancer was very similar between the vitamin D intervention group and the placebo control group ( 9.16 % versus 9.29 % ) , the risk reduction in mortality was deemed “ significant.
” As reported by the authors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New $ 18.95 ( $ 4.74 / Fl Oz ) Several studies have highlighted the benefit of vitamin D for breast cancer .
For example , an analysis14 by GrassrootsHealth published June 2018 in PLOS ONE showed women with a vitamin D level at or above 60 ng/mL ( 150 nmol/L ) had an 82 % lower risk of breast cancer compared to those with levels below 20 ng/mL ( 50 nmol/L ) .
An earlier study,15,16 which looked at women in the U.K. , found having a vitamin D level above 60 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breast cancer risk , which is nearly identical to GrassrootsHealth ’ s 2018 analysis .
One of the most recent meta-analyses17,18 looking at breast cancer was published December 28 , 2019 , in the journal Aging .
Here , they reviewed 70 observational studies , finding that for each 2 ng/mL ( 5 nmol/L ) increase in vitamin D level there was a corresponding 6 % decrease in breast cancer incidence .
Overall , this translates into a 71 % reduced risk when you increase your vitamin D level from 20 ng/mL to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ created by GrassrootsHealth,19 illustrates the dose response between vitamin D levels and breast cancer risk found in this study .
GrassrootsHealth ’ s 2018 analysis in PLOS ONE also analyzed this dose relationship.20 To do that , they looked at the percentage of breast cancer-free participants in various vitamin D groups , from deficient ( below 20 ng/mL ) to optimal ( at or above 60 ng/mL ) , over time ( four years ) .
As you might expect , the higher the blood level of vitamin D , the lower the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below illustrates this dose-related protection .
At four years , the percentage of women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer in the 60 ng/mL group was 78 % lower than among those with blood levels below 20 ng/mL .
How to Optimize Your Vitamin D Level BRI Resveratrol - 1200 ... Buy New $ 16.99 If you live in the northern hemisphere , which is currently heading toward winter , now is the time to check your vitamin D level and start taking action to raise it if you ’ re below @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As you can see from the studies above , a vitamin D level of 60 ng/mL ( 150 nmol/L ) or higher is recommended if you want to protect against cancer .
An easy and cost-effective way of measuring your vitamin D level is to order GrassrootsHealth ’ s vitamin D testing kit .
Once you know your current vitamin D level , use the GrassrootsHealth vitamin D calculator21 to determine how much vitamin D you might need to reach your target level .
To optimize vitamin D absorption and utilization , be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vitamin K2 and magnesium .
Lastly , remember to retest in three to four months to make sure you ’ ve reached your target level .
If you have , then you know you ’ re taking the correct dosage .
If you ’ re still low ( or have reached a level above 80 ng/mL ) , you ’ ll need to adjust your dosage accordingly and retest again in another three to four months .
The Best of Joseph Mercola

There’s good news for those of you who have taken the proactive step to make sure your vitamin D level is optimized. Several recent studies demonstrate vitamin D can have a significantly beneficial impact on your cancer risk, both in terms of preventing cancer and in the treatment of cancer.
Vitamin D Reduces Cancer Mortality
In the first of these studies,1,2 which included 25,871 patients, vitamin D supplementation was found to reduce the risk for metastatic cancer and death by 17%. The risk was reduced by as much as 38% among those who also maintained a healthy weight.
This was a really poorly done study as they only gave participants 2,000 IUs a day and never measured their blood levels. Had there been no improvement, I would not have been surprised, but the fact is it still reduced metastatic cancer and death by 17%, and they found significant benefit among those who were not obese. The Optimal Dose: Rest... Judson Somerville MD Best Price: $9.96 Buy New $9.98 (as of 06:05 UTC - Details)
This is pretty extraordinary but not as good as epidemiological studies that show a 50% to even 78% reduction in vitamin D sufficient people, as suggested in a study further below. That said, UPI reported the results saying:3
“The benefits of vitamin D3 in limiting metastases — or disease spread to other organs — and severity was seen across all cancers, and was particularly prominent among study participants who maintained a healthy weight …
‘The primary message [of our study] is that vitamin D may reduce the chance of developing metastatic or fatal cancer among adults without a diagnosis of cancer,’ study co-author Dr. Paulette Chandler told UPI.”
The study, published in JAMA Network Open, is a secondary analysis of the VITAL Study4 which, in part, sought to determine whether taking 2,000 IUs of vitamin D per day would reduce the risk of cancer, heart disease or stroke in people who did not have a prior history of these diseases.
The VITAL study itself, which followed patients for an average of 5.3 years, found no statistical difference in overall cancer rates among those who took vitamin D3, but there was a reduction in cancer-related deaths, which is what prompted this secondary analysis.
Obesity May Inhibit Vitamin D’s Benefits
The fact that patients with a healthy weight derived a much greater benefit — a 38% reduced risk for metastatic cancer and death compared to 17% overall — suggests your body weight may play a significant role in whether vitamin D supplementation will provide you with the anticancer benefits you seek.
Obesity may confer resistance to vitamin D effects. ~ Dr. Paulette Chandler Natures Plus Liquid Su... Buy New $19.95 ($1.25 / Fl Oz) (as of 04:18 UTC - Details )
According to study co-author Dr. Paulette Chandler, assistant professor of medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, “Our study highlights that obesity may confer resistance to vitamin D effects.”5
There may be something to that. Research6 published in 2010 found that dietary fructose inhibits intestinal calcium absorption, thereby inducing vitamin D insufficiency in people with chronic kidney disease.
That said, vitamin D tends to be lower in obese people in general, for the fact that it’s a fat-soluble nutrient and when you’re obese, the vitamin D ends up being “volumetrically diluted.” As explained in the paper “Vitamin D in Obesity,” published in 2017:7
“Serum vitamin D is lower in obese people; it is important to understand the mechanism of this effect and whether it indicates clinically significant deficiency … Vitamin D is fat soluble, and distributed into fat, muscle, liver, and serum.
All of these compartments are increased in volume in obesity, so the lower vitamin D likely reflects a volumetric dilution effect and whole body stores of vitamin D may be adequate … Obese people need higher loading doses of vitamin D to achieve the same serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D as normal weight.”
While that particular paper stresses that lower vitamin D in obese individuals might not mean that they’re deficient, others disagree. For example, one study8,9 found that for every 10% increase in body-mass index, there’s a 4.2% reduction in blood levels of vitamin D. According to the authors of that particular study, obesity may in fact be a causal factor in the development of vitamin D deficiency.10
Vitamin D Also Improves Colorectal Cancer Outcomes
A scientific review11 published in the September 2020 issue of the British Journal of Cancer noted that having low vitamin D is associated with poor colorectal cancer survival. The Vitamin D Solution... Michael F. Holick Best Price: $2.01 Buy New $9.08 (as of 10:55 UTC - Details)
To assess whether vitamin D supplementation might improve survival in these patients, they reviewed the findings of seven trials, three of which included patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer from the outset and four population trials that reported survival in incident cases.
Overall, the meta-analysis found supplementation resulted in a 30% reduction in adverse colorectal cancer outcomes. Vitamin D also improved outcomes among patients already diagnosed with colorectal cancer. According to the authors:12
“Meta-analysis demonstrates a clinically meaningful benefit of vitamin D supplementation on [colorectal cancer] survival outcomes. Further well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are needed to … [determine] optimal dosing.”
Low Vitamin D Linked to Increased Cancer Incidence
Another review and meta-analysis,13 this one published in November 2019 in Bioscience Reports, looked at vitamin D supplementation on cancer incidence and mortality in general. Ten randomized controlled trials with a pool of 81,362 participants were included in the analysis.
While the incidence rate of cancer was very similar between the vitamin D intervention group and the placebo control group (9.16% versus 9.29%), the risk reduction in mortality was deemed “significant.” As reported by the authors:
“The mortality rate of cancer was 2.11% (821 cases) and 2.43% (942 cases) in vitamin D intervention group and placebo group, respectively, resulting in a significant reduction in risk (RR = 0.87).
There was no observable heterogeneity or publication bias … Our findings support a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplement on lowering cancer mortality, especially in subpopulations with no history of cancer, extra use of vitamin D, or calcium supplement.”
Vitamin D Protects Against Breast Cancer
Organic Zinc Sulfate L... Buy New $18.95 ($4.74 / Fl Oz) (as of 02:28 UTC - Details) Several studies have highlighted the benefit of vitamin D for breast cancer. For example, an analysis14 by GrassrootsHealth published June 2018 in PLOS ONE showed women with a vitamin D level at or above 60 ng/mL (150 nmol/L) had an 82% lower risk of breast cancer compared to those with levels below 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L).
An earlier study,15,16 which looked at women in the U.K., found having a vitamin D level above 60 ng/mL resulted in an 83% lower breast cancer risk, which is nearly identical to GrassrootsHealth’s 2018 analysis.
One of the most recent meta-analyses17,18 looking at breast cancer was published December 28, 2019, in the journal Aging. Here, they reviewed 70 observational studies, finding that for each 2 ng/mL (5 nmol/L) increase in vitamin D level there was a corresponding 6% decrease in breast cancer incidence.
Overall, this translates into a 71% reduced risk when you increase your vitamin D level from 20 ng/mL to 60 ng/mL. The following graph, created by GrassrootsHealth,19 illustrates the dose response between vitamin D levels and breast cancer risk found in this study.
GrassrootsHealth’s 2018 analysis in PLOS ONE also analyzed this dose relationship.20 To do that, they looked at the percentage of breast cancer-free participants in various vitamin D groups, from deficient (below 20 ng/mL) to optimal (at or above 60 ng/mL), over time (four years).
As you might expect, the higher the blood level of vitamin D, the lower the incidence of breast cancer. The graph below illustrates this dose-related protection. At four years, the percentage of women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer in the 60 ng/mL group was 78% lower than among those with blood levels below 20 ng/mL.
How to Optimize Your Vitamin D Level
BRI Resveratrol - 1200... Buy New $16.99 (as of 05:25 UTC - Details) If you live in the northern hemisphere, which is currently heading toward winter, now is the time to check your vitamin D level and start taking action to raise it if you’re below 40 ng/mL (100 nmol/L). As you can see from the studies above, a vitamin D level of 60 ng/mL (150 nmol/L) or higher is recommended if you want to protect against cancer.
An easy and cost-effective way of measuring your vitamin D level is to order GrassrootsHealth’s vitamin D testing kit. Once you know your current vitamin D level, use the GrassrootsHealth vitamin D calculator21 to determine how much vitamin D you might need to reach your target level. To optimize vitamin D absorption and utilization, be sure to take your vitamin D with vitamin K2 and magnesium.
Lastly, remember to retest in three to four months to make sure you’ve reached your target level. If you have, then you know you’re taking the correct dosage. If you’re still low (or have reached a level above 80 ng/mL), you’ll need to adjust your dosage accordingly and retest again in another three to four months.
Sources and References
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola


lewrockwell--2020-12-09--Costs Must Be Weighed Against Benefits

Costs Must Be Weighed Against Benefits

One of the first lessons in an economics class is every action has a cost .
That is in stark contrast to lessons in the political arena where politicians virtually ignore cost and talk about benefits and free stuff .
If we look only at the benefits of an action , policy or program , then we will do anything because there is a benefit to any action , policy or program .
Think about one simple example .
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 36,096 Americans lost their lives in motor vehicle traffic crashes in 2019 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ saved if we had a 5 mph speed limit .
The huge benefit of a 5 mph speed limit is that those 36,000-plus Americans would have been with us instead of lost in highway carnage .
Fortunately , we look at the costs of having a 5 mph speed limit and rightly conclude that saving those 36,000-plus lives are not worth the costs and inconvenience .
Most of us find it too callous , when talking about life , to explicitly weigh costs against benefits .
We simply say that a 5 mph @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the benefits and costs of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic ?
Much of the medical profession and politicians say that lockdowns , social distancing and mask-wearing are the solutions .
CDC data on death rates show if one is under 35 , the chances of dying from COVID-19 is much lower than that of being in a bicycle accident .
Should we lockdown bicycles ?
Dr. Martin Kulldorff , professor of medicine at Harvard University , biostatistician and epidemiologist , Dr. Sunetra Gupta , professor at Oxford University and an epidemiologist with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bhattacharya , professor at Stanford University Medical School , a physician and epidemiologist were the initiators of the Great Barrington Declaration .
More than 50,000 scientists and doctors , as well as more than 682,000 ordinary people , have signed the Great Barrington Declaration opposing a second COVID-19 lockdown because they see it doing much more harm than good .
Best Selling A Gavin B ... Buy New $ 386.78 Efforts to keep very young from getting COVID-19 , given most will not even realize they have it or will suffer only mild @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it delays the point where a country has herd immunity .
According to the CDC , COVID-19 deaths in young people ( from babies to college students ) are almost nonexistent .
The first age group to provide a substantial contribution to the death toll is 45-54 years , who contribute nearly 5 % of all coronavirus deaths .
More than 80 % of deaths occur in people aged 65 and over .
That increases to over 92 % if the 55-64 age group is included .
Thus , only a tiny number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 .
Yet , schools have been closed , and tens of millions of schoolchildren have been denied in-class instruction .
Mandating that 5-year-olds wear masks during their school day is beyond nonsense .
Virtual learning can serve as a substitute for in-class teaching but it has mixed results .
Some parents can provide their children with the necessary tools , perhaps hire tutors , and take an active interest in what their children are doing online .
Other parents will not have the interest , ability or the time .
Here is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authorities permit groceries and pharmacies to remain open during lockdowns .
They permitted stores likes Walmart , Costco and Sam ’ s Club to remain open .
However , these stores sell items that are also sold in stores that were locked down such as : Macy ’ s , J.C. Penney , J .
Crew Group , Neiman Marcus and Bed Bath & Beyond .
The lack of equal treatment caused many employees to lose their jobs and many formerly financially healthy retailers have filed for bankruptcy .
As political satirist H. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed ( and hence clamorous to be led to safety ) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins , all of them imaginary.
” By the way , the best time to scare people , be wrong and persist in being wrong is when the costs of being wrong are borne by others .
The Best of Walter E. Williams

One of the first lessons in an economics class is every action has a cost. That is in stark contrast to lessons in the political arena where politicians virtually ignore cost and talk about benefits and free stuff. If we look only at the benefits of an action, policy or program, then we will do anything because there is a benefit to any action, policy or program.
Think about one simple example. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 36,096 Americans lost their lives in motor vehicle traffic crashes in 2019. Virtually all those lives could have been saved if we had a 5 mph speed limit. The huge benefit of a 5 mph speed limit is that those 36,000-plus Americans would have been with us instead of lost in highway carnage. Fortunately, we look at the costs of having a 5 mph speed limit and rightly conclude that saving those 36,000-plus lives are not worth the costs and inconvenience. Most of us find it too callous, when talking about life, to explicitly weigh costs against benefits. We simply say that a 5 mph speed limit would be impractical.
What about the benefits and costs of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic? Much of the medical profession and politicians say that lockdowns, social distancing and mask-wearing are the solutions. CDC data on death rates show if one is under 35, the chances of dying from COVID-19 is much lower than that of being in a bicycle accident. Should we lockdown bicycles? Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, biostatistician and epidemiologist, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University and an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician and epidemiologist were the initiators of the Great Barrington Declaration. More than 50,000 scientists and doctors, as well as more than 682,000 ordinary people, have signed the Great Barrington Declaration opposing a second COVID-19 lockdown because they see it doing much more harm than good. Best Selling A Gavin B... Buy New $386.78 (as of 05:13 UTC - Details)
Efforts to keep very young from getting COVID-19, given most will not even realize they have it or will suffer only mild symptoms, may be counterproductive in that it delays the point where a country has herd immunity. According to the CDC, COVID-19 deaths in young people (from babies to college students) are almost nonexistent. The first age group to provide a substantial contribution to the death toll is 45-54 years, who contribute nearly 5% of all coronavirus deaths. More than 80% of deaths occur in people aged 65 and over. That increases to over 92% if the 55-64 age group is included.
Thus, only a tiny number of people under age 25 die of COVID-19. Yet, schools have been closed, and tens of millions of schoolchildren have been denied in-class instruction. Mandating that 5-year-olds wear masks during their school day is beyond nonsense. Virtual learning can serve as a substitute for in-class teaching but it has mixed results. Some parents can provide their children with the necessary tools, perhaps hire tutors, and take an active interest in what their children are doing online. Other parents will not have the interest, ability or the time.
Here is a lockdown question for you. Government authorities permit groceries and pharmacies to remain open during lockdowns. They permitted stores likes Walmart, Costco and Sam’s Club to remain open. However, these stores sell items that are also sold in stores that were locked down such as: Macy’s, J.C. Penney, J. Crew Group, Neiman Marcus and Bed Bath & Beyond. The lack of equal treatment caused many employees to lose their jobs and many formerly financially healthy retailers have filed for bankruptcy.
As political satirist H. L. Mencken said, “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” By the way, the best time to scare people, be wrong and persist in being wrong is when the costs of being wrong are borne by others.
The Best of Walter E. Williams


lewrockwell--2020-12-09--At This Point, Are Americans Anything More Than Lab Animals?

“ We slow the progress of science today for all sorts of ethical reasons .
Biomedicine could advance much faster if we abolished our rules on human experimentation in clinical trials , as Nazi researchers did.
” The idea of brutal experimentation on animals has always been justified by claiming that it is necessary in order to benefit the health or mental well being of humans .
This propagandist thinking could and would lead to a public acceptance of experimenting and torture of living things in the false name of human progress .
But it was also meant to condition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in order to better his own .
It stands to reason that once this mindset was in place , it could be argued that human experimentation could enhance that ‘ progress ’ much further , thereby becoming a necessary evil that could be seen as beneficial , especially if it began with psychological experimentation , and not physical .
Now that the psyche and body are in many cases being seen as one and the same , why not use medical testing of some humans so as to benefit the collective ?
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ destroyed in favor of the group , and this could easily lead to sacrificing some for the good of all .
The result of this progression would be that we are all lab animals now .
Best Selling Lopez Haz ... Buy New $ 321.99 In this era of the fraudulent coronavirus ‘ pandemic , ’ most are well on their way to becoming a nation of mindless drones that will be accepting of human experimentation .
This is in fact already happening , but it seems that it will get much worse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but considering the herd mentality of the human species , it is much more likely to breed passivity and compliance , both very detrimental to survival in what could be considered any normal way of life .
It is not that this government and its controllers have not used its citizens and others for these purposes in the past , but today it is becoming rampant , and is even out in the open concerning current policies in place .
Most all that is now being mandated by the political class is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ predicated on compliance testing , this regardless of the gross harm caused .
You see , when experimenting with the human animal , it is first necessary to gauge the psyche of the average person in order to know how far the experiment can advance .
Because of this , it is crucial to perform psychological experimentation prior to physical experimentation .
This of course is not necessary with animals , but is vital with ‘ reasoning ’ humans .
With mass compliance , it becomes evident to the ruling sector of society @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guinea pigs , and therefore are ripe for abuse .
These lockdowns , distancing rules , mask wearing , voluntary business closings , virus testing , and restrictions to liberty at every level , are simply tests to see if the people are willing to follow ludicrous and dangerous instructions in order to gain some sort of false safety due only to pre-planned government propaganda .
It has been obvious that Americans in large part have been willing to do absolutely anything they were told to do , including allowing their older family @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effectively murdered , due to forced isolation by the state .
The ultimate goal of the state here is to first destroy the human spirit , leaving an empty mind and a blank slate so that the people at large are ready and willing to become the test subjects for their claimed masters .
The day of the first significant physical experiment on this population is fast approaching , and at this time seems imminent .
That experiment will rival many of the heinous and torturous ‘ scientific ’ persecutions of the past @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it will be made to seem voluntary instead of being done through incarceration and brute force .
But there is a sinister aspect of this feigned voluntarism that exposes a heinous psychological manipulation .
Nearly Natural 5326 8f ... Best Price : $ 105.40 Buy New $ 152.98 I am speaking here of course of the coming poisonous ‘ Covid-19 ’ vaccination .
The contradiction and foretelling of doom is obvious , so why are so many already willing to be used as lab animals ?
The first sign of great danger lies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exempted the pharmaceutical companies developing these experimental toxins from all liability .
The state with your money is also paying for the development of these virulent injections , while allowing unlimited profit to its partners in crime .
In addition , the government is claiming to be liable , but that is a lie , as government has nothing , and produces nothing ; it only steals from those that do .
So each and every citizen guinea pig taking this deadly and experimental vaccine is personally liable for any and all harm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manufacturers , deliverers , and the government have zero risk , while the people retain all the physical , mental , medical , and financial liability .
This is a true government coup d ’ état , in that the human lab animals take all the risk , contract all the sickness , disease and even face death , and also pay for all the damages .
While the political class will crow loudly about this not being mandatory , they will at the same time threaten every single individual that does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this vaccine .
Those threats will be brutal , and meant to destroy any that do not comply .
So this vaccine will really be mandated in that those that disobey will be abused , and attempts by the government to force consent will be completely inhumane .
The ability to get daily necessities including food will be eliminated , as will most all travel , working and supporting family without an immunization pass , gaining medical care , access to any service , all public entertainment and activities , and most anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voluntary to you ?
But this experimentation will not end here , but will also continue as long as the people allow it to continue .
There will be new experimental vaccines , new updated injections , injectable nanoparticles , chips , property confiscation and redistribution , RNA and DNA experimentation , universal basic income , governmental digital money , tracking devices , and many other intrusions said to be necessary for any citizen wanting to be able to move about or function in any ‘ new normal ’ manner .
So long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the list of demands by the state will be innumerable .
Best Selling Mission B ... Buy New $ 165.99 We are all facing one giant experiment where the powerful controlling ‘ elites ’ and their pawns in government are the mad scientists , and the common masses are the lab animal test subjects .
There is only one answer to this madness : Disobey every government order and be prepared to defend at all costs your life , your family , your property , and your freedom !
“ The enrichment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ employee initiative of forced voluntary participation .
If any Aperture Science employee would like to opt out of this new voluntary testing program , please remember ; science rhymes with compliance .
The Best of Gary D. Barnett

“We slow the progress of science today for all sorts of ethical reasons. Biomedicine could advance much faster if we abolished our rules on human experimentation in clinical trials, as Nazi researchers did.”
~ Paul Nitze
The idea of brutal experimentation on animals has always been justified by claiming that it is necessary in order to benefit the health or mental well being of humans. This propagandist thinking could and would lead to a public acceptance of experimenting and torture of living things in the false name of human progress. But it was also meant to condition man to accept harm to one species in order to better his own. It stands to reason that once this mindset was in place, it could be argued that human experimentation could enhance that ‘progress’ much further, thereby becoming a necessary evil that could be seen as beneficial, especially if it began with psychological experimentation, and not physical. Now that the psyche and body are in many cases being seen as one and the same, why not use medical testing of some humans so as to benefit the collective? In this scenario, the individual would be destroyed in favor of the group, and this could easily lead to sacrificing some for the good of all. The result of this progression would be that we are all lab animals now. Best Selling Lopez Haz... Buy New $321.99 (as of 05:13 UTC - Details)
In this era of the fraudulent coronavirus ‘pandemic,’ most are well on their way to becoming a nation of mindless drones that will be accepting of human experimentation. This is in fact already happening, but it seems that it will get much worse very soon. Fear can breed aggression, but considering the herd mentality of the human species, it is much more likely to breed passivity and compliance, both very detrimental to survival in what could be considered any normal way of life. It is not that this government and its controllers have not used its citizens and others for these purposes in the past, but today it is becoming rampant, and is even out in the open concerning current policies in place.
Most all that is now being mandated by the political class is based on experimentation. That experimentation is predicated on compliance testing, this regardless of the gross harm caused. You see, when experimenting with the human animal, it is first necessary to gauge the psyche of the average person in order to know how far the experiment can advance. Because of this, it is crucial to perform psychological experimentation prior to physical experimentation. This of course is not necessary with animals, but is vital with ‘reasoning’ humans. With mass compliance, it becomes evident to the ruling sector of society that the people are prepared to become guinea pigs, and therefore are ripe for abuse. These lockdowns, distancing rules, mask wearing, voluntary business closings, virus testing, and restrictions to liberty at every level, are simply tests to see if the people are willing to follow ludicrous and dangerous instructions in order to gain some sort of false safety due only to pre-planned government propaganda. It has been obvious that Americans in large part have been willing to do absolutely anything they were told to do, including allowing their older family members to be psychologically tortured, and effectively murdered, due to forced isolation by the state.
The ultimate goal of the state here is to first destroy the human spirit, leaving an empty mind and a blank slate so that the people at large are ready and willing to become the test subjects for their claimed masters. The day of the first significant physical experiment on this population is fast approaching, and at this time seems imminent. That experiment will rival many of the heinous and torturous ‘scientific’ persecutions of the past, but will be unique in that it will be made to seem voluntary instead of being done through incarceration and brute force. But there is a sinister aspect of this feigned voluntarism that exposes a heinous psychological manipulation. Nearly Natural 5326 8f... Best Price: $105.40 Buy New $152.98 (as of 05:13 UTC - Details)
I am speaking here of course of the coming poisonous ‘Covid-19’ vaccination. The contradiction and foretelling of doom is obvious, so why are so many already willing to be used as lab animals? The first sign of great danger lies in the fact that the state has exempted the pharmaceutical companies developing these experimental toxins from all liability. The state with your money is also paying for the development of these virulent injections, while allowing unlimited profit to its partners in crime. In addition, the government is claiming to be liable, but that is a lie, as government has nothing, and produces nothing; it only steals from those that do. So each and every citizen guinea pig taking this deadly and experimental vaccine is personally liable for any and all harm. What this means is that vaccine manufacturers, deliverers, and the government have zero risk, while the people retain all the physical, mental, medical, and financial liability. This is a true government coup d’état, in that the human lab animals take all the risk, contract all the sickness, disease and even face death, and also pay for all the damages.
While the political class will crow loudly about this not being mandatory, they will at the same time threaten every single individual that does not bow down to the state and take this vaccine. Those threats will be brutal, and meant to destroy any that do not comply. So this vaccine will really be mandated in that those that disobey will be abused, and attempts by the government to force consent will be completely inhumane. The ability to get daily necessities including food will be eliminated, as will most all travel, working and supporting family without an immunization pass, gaining medical care, access to any service, all public entertainment and activities, and most anything vital to life. Does this sound voluntary to you?
But this experimentation will not end here, but will also continue as long as the people allow it to continue. There will be new experimental vaccines, new updated injections, injectable nanoparticles, chips, property confiscation and redistribution, RNA and DNA experimentation, universal basic income, governmental digital money, tracking devices, and many other intrusions said to be necessary for any citizen wanting to be able to move about or function in any ‘new normal’ manner. So long as the people comply with these orders, the list of demands by the state will be innumerable. Best Selling Mission B... Buy New $165.99 (as of 05:13 UTC - Details)
We are all facing one giant experiment where the powerful controlling ‘elites’ and their pawns in government are the mad scientists, and the common masses are the lab animal test subjects.
There is only one answer to this madness: Disobey every government order and be prepared to defend at all costs your life, your family, your property, and your freedom!
“The enrichment center would like to announce a new employee initiative of forced voluntary participation.
If any Aperture Science employee would like to opt out of this new voluntary testing program, please remember; science rhymes with compliance.
Ted Kosmatka, Portal 2: Lab Rat
Source links:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/07/bill-sardi/forced-vaccination-plan-unveiled/
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/11/jon-rappoport/how-theyll-fake-the-success-of-the-covid-vaccine/
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/12/no_author/covid-19-vaccination-whatcha-gonna-do-when-they-come-for-you/
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/12/jon-rappoport/covert-op-the-virus-as-cover-story/
The Best of Gary D. Barnett


lewrockwell--2020-12-09--Fed Razes Its Own Edifice

Fed Razes Its Own Edifice

In March the Deep State Money Manipulators brazenly did away with the primary foundation upon which the central bank was erected .
And almost no one noticed !
Under cover of the Covid-19 panic , Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell and the Fed ’ s Board bulldozed its entire rationale , the central argument used to persuade the skeptical American people more than a century ago to allow the establishment of a national bank .
Then they shoved this justification over a cliff and into the memory hole below .
There is a reason the Fed was named the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be called “ federal ” to evoke the image and might of the US government .
It was to be called a system ” to avoid the term bank .
But the operative word for its function is “ reserve.
” Instead of each bank depositing its reserves with another private bank as they had done , member banks of the new system were all required instead to deposit mandated reserves with the new central bank .
This provision was used as a primary selling-point for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these lines : the central bank would protect against regional panics and against bank runs .
Its national presence and the collective resources of its reserves would make the new system a bulwark against bank failures .
Although it gave the banking cartel a monopoly on the creation of money and credit , the people would come to believe that it operated in the public interest .
Eventually the Federal Reserve became the central economic planner of American life .
The Last Gold Rushu202 ... Haynes , Bill Buy New $ 28.00 With @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 1913 created a “ fractional reserve ” banking system for the US .
This meant that each member bank was required to maintain a balance on account with the Federal Reserve in an amount representing a fraction of the deposits its customers have made with it .
The bank could issue loans to borrowers with the rest of those deposits .
In other words , banks made loans in amounts many times greater than the amount of their required reserves .
For example , if the reserve ratio is 1:10 , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the Fed would be empowered to loan out ten times that amount : $ 1 billion .
Central bankers of earlier eras might have broken out in sweats had they lived to see it , but as the pandemic stay-at-home orders spread and businesses closed their doors in early 2020 , the Fed began a program of massive money creation that quickly amounted to an unprecedented $ 3 trillion .
Accompanying this gusher of liquidity was the Fed ’ s announcement that it “ reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next reserve maintenance period .
This action eliminates reserve requirements for thousands of depository institutions and will help to support lending to households and businesses.
” Max & Lily Bunk Bed wi ... Buy New $ 704.42 With that the Fed ’ s reserve function slipped down the memory hole .
Just as paper money ’ s function as a claim check for gold was forgotten and only the paper remained , now the Fed ’ s primary function disappeared almost unnoticed .
Only money printing and credit creation remain .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the endgame of a paper money regime .
What is the need to maintain actual money reserves if the Fed can just print whatever it likes to paper over any bank or solvency problems ?
This article is excerpted from the new book THE LAST GOLD RUSH… EVER !
7 Reasons for the Runaway Gold Market and How You Can Profit from It , by Charles Goyette and Bill Haynes .
The Best of Charles Goyette

In March the Deep State Money Manipulators brazenly did away with the primary foundation upon which the central bank was erected.
And almost no one noticed!
Under cover of the Covid-19 panic, Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell and the Fed’s Board bulldozed its entire rationale, the central argument used to persuade the skeptical American people more than a century ago to allow the establishment of a national bank. Then they shoved this justification over a cliff and into the memory hole below.
There is a reason the Fed was named the “Federal Reserve System.” It was to be called “federal” to evoke the image and might of the US government. It was to be called a system” to avoid the term bank. But the operative word for its function is “reserve.” Instead of each bank depositing its reserves with another private bank as they had done, member banks of the new system were all required instead to deposit mandated reserves with the new central bank. This provision was used as a primary selling-point for the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The argument went along these lines: the central bank would protect against regional panics and against bank runs. Its national presence and the collective resources of its reserves would make the new system a bulwark against bank failures. Although it gave the banking cartel a monopoly on the creation of money and credit, the people would come to believe that it operated in the public interest. Eventually the Federal Reserve became the central economic planner of American life. The Last Gold Rushu202... Haynes, Bill Buy New $28.00 (as of 04:04 UTC - Details)
With its passage, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 created a “fractional reserve” banking system for the US. This meant that each member bank was required to maintain a balance on account with the Federal Reserve in an amount representing a fraction of the deposits its customers have made with it. The bank could issue loans to borrowers with the rest of those deposits. In other words, banks made loans in amounts many times greater than the amount of their required reserves. For example, if the reserve ratio is 1:10, a bank with $100 million in reserves with the Fed would be empowered to loan out ten times that amount: $1 billion.
Central bankers of earlier eras might have broken out in sweats had they lived to see it, but as the pandemic stay-at-home orders spread and businesses closed their doors in early 2020, the Fed began a program of massive money creation that quickly amounted to an unprecedented $3 trillion. Accompanying this gusher of liquidity was the Fed’s announcement that it “reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective on March 26, the beginning of the next reserve maintenance period. This action eliminates reserve requirements for thousands of depository institutions and will help to support lending to households and businesses.” Max & Lily Bunk Bed wi... Buy New $704.42 (as of 05:14 UTC - Details)
With that the Fed’s reserve function slipped down the memory hole. Just as paper money’s function as a claim check for gold was forgotten and only the paper remained, now the Fed’s primary function disappeared almost unnoticed. Only money printing and credit creation remain.
But it makes a certain kind of sense in the endgame of a paper money regime. What is the need to maintain actual money reserves if the Fed can just print whatever it likes to paper over any bank or solvency problems?
# # #
—
This article is excerpted from the new book THE LAST GOLD RUSH… EVER! 7 Reasons for the Runaway Gold Market and How You Can Profit from It, by Charles Goyette and Bill Haynes.
The Best of Charles Goyette


lewrockwell--2020-12-09--Florida Forcing Labs To Report Number of PCR Test Cycles—Game Changer

If the governor of Florida handles this breakthrough correctly , it could be the beginning of the end for one widespread piece of COVID test fakery… And the beginning of the end of “ rising case numbers ” As I ’ ve reported , COVID testing labs never tell doctors or patients how the PCR test is run .
[ 1 ] This means the number of cycles is a secret .
A cycle is a step up in amplification of the tissue sample taken from the patient .
57 ” Loveseat Sle ... Buy New $ 421.11 As even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at 35 cycles or above are useless .
[ 1 ] [ 2 ] They ’ re also misleading .
The results tend to be positive , meaning the patient is “ infected with the virus.
” But this is false .
However , as I ’ ve also reported , the CDC and the FDA recommend that the test should be run at up to 40 cycles .
[ 1 ] [ 3 ] This is a direct hustle .
It ensures false positives and higher COVID case numbers—used as justification for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Florida is doing something unheard of .
It ’ s demanding that labs report the “ cycle threshold ” for every test they run .
Here is the relevant wording in a release from the Florida governor , Ron DeSantis , and the state Department of Health , dated December 3 , 2020 [ 4 ] : “ Cycle threshold ( CT ) values and their reference ranges , as applicable , must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately.
” “ If your laboratory is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reference ranges , the lab should begin reporting this information to FDOH within seven days of the date of this memorandum.
” We can assume there is only one reason for this order .
The Florida governor and the Department of Health are aware that tests run at 35 cycles or higher are useless and misleading , and they want to stop this crime .
Imagine what happens if the trend of “ new COVID cases ” in Florida soon takes a sudden dip and keeps on falling—because labs are finally telling the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are being rejected .
The con will be exposed .
And imagine other states following Florida ’ s example .
JUMMICO Fabric Recline ... Buy New $ 129.88 I have a few concerns .
The term “ cycle threshold ” is taken to be more or less synonymous with “ number of cycles.
” But I would prefer Florida simply say : “ All labs must report the number of cycles for each PCR test they run.
” For me , that would be clearer .
And then , down in the Florida @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If your laboratory is unable to report CT values and their reference ranges , please fill out the brief questionnaire attached to this memorandum and submit by facsimile to the FDOH ’ s Bureau of Epidemiology confidential fax line… ” [ the link to the questionnaire is in [ 4 ] ] Unable to report ?
Why would any lab be unable ?
The questionnaire offers two bizarre possibilities .
The first : “ Although the qualitative result is generated based on a CT value , the assay/instrument does not provide the user @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CT value—it only provides the qualitative result.
” What ?
?
This indicates the lab ’ s PCR equipment is internally pre-programmed to run the test at a certain number of cycles , and the lab doesn ’ t know what that number is , can ’ t find out , and can ’ t demand the equipment manufacturer disclose that vital piece of information .
ABSURD .
We ’ re dealing with a state secret ?
The second item in the questionnaire for labs : “ The laboratory does not have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to FDOH [ Florida Dept .
of Health ] since the CT value does not get reported to the submitting provider.
” No mechanism for reporting ?
SET ONE UP .
Email , fax , pencil and paper , carrier pigeon .
Also ABSURD .
Christopher Knight Hom ... Buy New $ 221.67 As always , the devil is in the details .
I ’ m sure many labs will try to avoid reporting .
They don ’ t want to be exposed as the charlatans they are .
Memo to Florida Governor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ labs weasel out of this one .
Don ’ t let them give you excuses .
Don ’ t let them off the hook .
Failure to report true facts during a public health crisis is felony .
Charge a few labs , drag them into court .
Put fear of prosecution into state labs .
You ’ re on the right track .
You ’ ve made a major breakthrough .
You see the con at work .
You don ’ t want your state to be pressured into lockdowns based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Now make sure your enforcement personnel crack down on reluctant labs .
Go the distance .
If labs have equipment pre-set for the number of cycles , and they don ’ t know how to get inside the equipment to find that number , bring in pros who will do the job for them .
I believe you ’ ll uncover a major scandal .
Much of that equipment will be pre-set for 40 cycles .
Keep updating the public on what you discover .
Blow this crime wide open .
Keep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health officials .
Among them , you ’ ll find agents who don ’ t want the truth to emerge .
They ’ ll try to sabotage your good efforts every which way they can .
The Best of Jon Rappoport

If the governor of Florida handles this breakthrough correctly, it could be the beginning of the end for one widespread piece of COVID test fakery…
And the beginning of the end of “rising case numbers”
As I’ve reported, COVID testing labs never tell doctors or patients how the PCR test is run. [1]
This means the number of cycles is a secret.
A cycle is a step up in amplification of the tissue sample taken from the patient. 57” Loveseat Sle... Buy New $421.11 (as of 05:15 UTC - Details)
As even Tony Fauci has asserted, tests run at 35 cycles or above are useless. [1] [2] They’re also misleading. The results tend to be positive, meaning the patient is “infected with the virus.” But this is false.
However, as I’ve also reported, the CDC and the FDA recommend that the test should be run at up to 40 cycles. [1] [3] This is a direct hustle. It ensures false positives and higher COVID case numbers—used as justification for lockdowns.
Now, the state of Florida is doing something unheard of. It’s demanding that labs report the “cycle threshold” for every test they run.
Here is the relevant wording in a release from the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, and the state Department of Health, dated December 3, 2020 [4]:
“Cycle threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges, as applicable, must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately.”
“If your laboratory is not currently reporting CT values and their reference ranges, the lab should begin reporting this information to FDOH within seven days of the date of this memorandum.”
We can assume there is only one reason for this order. The Florida governor and the Department of Health are aware that tests run at 35 cycles or higher are useless and misleading, and they want to stop this crime.
Imagine what happens if the trend of “new COVID cases” in Florida soon takes a sudden dip and keeps on falling—because labs are finally telling the truth. Because their deceptive test results are being rejected. The con will be exposed.
And imagine other states following Florida’s example. JUMMICO Fabric Recline... Buy New $129.88 (as of 05:15 UTC - Details)
I have a few concerns. The term “cycle threshold” is taken to be more or less synonymous with “number of cycles.” But I would prefer Florida simply say: “All labs must report the number of cycles for each PCR test they run.” For me, that would be clearer.
And then, down in the Florida memo, we have this: “If your laboratory is unable to report CT values and their reference ranges, please fill out the brief questionnaire attached to this memorandum and submit by facsimile to the FDOH’s Bureau of Epidemiology confidential fax line…” [the link to the questionnaire is in [4]]
Unable to report? Why would any lab be unable?
The questionnaire offers two bizarre possibilities. The first: “Although the qualitative result is generated based on a CT value, the assay/instrument does not provide the user [the lab] with the actual CT value—it only provides the qualitative result.”
What?? This indicates the lab’s PCR equipment is internally pre-programmed to run the test at a certain number of cycles, and the lab doesn’t know what that number is, can’t find out, and can’t demand the equipment manufacturer disclose that vital piece of information. ABSURD. We’re dealing with a state secret?
The second item in the questionnaire for labs: “The laboratory does not have a separate mechanism to report the CT value to FDOH [Florida Dept. of Health] since the CT value does not get reported to the submitting provider.”
No mechanism for reporting? SET ONE UP. Email, fax, pencil and paper, carrier pigeon. Also ABSURD. Christopher Knight Hom... Buy New $221.67 (as of 05:15 UTC - Details)
As always, the devil is in the details. I’m sure many labs will try to avoid reporting. They don’t want to be exposed as the charlatans they are.
Memo to Florida Governor DeSantis: Don’t let the labs weasel out of this one. Don’t let them give you excuses. Don’t let them off the hook. Failure to report true facts during a public health crisis is felony. Charge a few labs, drag them into court. Put fear of prosecution into state labs. You’re on the right track. You’ve made a major breakthrough. You see the con at work. You don’t want your state to be pressured into lockdowns based on fake case numbers derived from deceptive tests. Now make sure your enforcement personnel crack down on reluctant labs. Go the distance. If labs have equipment pre-set for the number of cycles, and they don’t know how to get inside the equipment to find that number, bring in pros who will do the job for them. I believe you’ll uncover a major scandal. Much of that equipment will be pre-set for 40 cycles. Keep updating the public on what you discover. Blow this crime wide open. Keep a very close eye on your public health officials. Among them, you’ll find agents who don’t want the truth to emerge. They’ll try to sabotage your good efforts every which way they can.
DON’T LET THEM.
SOURCES:
[1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/03/lockdowns-are-based-on-fraud-open-letter-to-people-who-want-freedom/
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE
[3] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
[4] https://www.flhealthsource.gov/files/Laboratory-Reporting-CT-Values-12032020.pdf
The Best of Jon Rappoport


lewrockwell--2020-12-09--Alberta, Canada, Premier Rejects Idea of ‘The Great Reset’ & Explains What He Believes It Represents

Throughout history global chaos has always been used as a precursor to big change on our planet .
Sometimes many of these changes are done under the guise of good will , where the initiators of these measures claim they are doing it for humanities best interests .
We saw this , for example , when NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden exposed the extent of surveillance that ’ s conducted by the U.S. government , measures put in place that are supposedly for our protection .
Snowden has recently expressed his opinion that COVID-19 is being used by governments to grab @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our basic rights and freedoms .
This seems to be a common theme also expressed by many when it comes to what ’ s called “ The Great Reset.
” What is “ The Great Reset ?
” It ’ s an initiative that ’ s been started by the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) .
The House of Windsor , and the UN are prime executive co-producers .
It was the title of a book that was published by WEF founder Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret earlier this year .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Microsoft .
According to them , “ There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis .
To improve the state of the world , the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.
” Ameriwood Home Carver ... Best Price : $ 94.89 Buy New $ 141.05 I am not going to go into great detail here about The Great Reset , as I recently published an essay on it doing just that titled COVID-19 : A Precursor To A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The Great Reset.
” You can refer to it if interested as it ’ s a much deeper discussion on the topic .
With this piece I simply wanted to share the opinion of Alberta Premier , Jason Kenney , and encourage people to ask themselves why controversial topics are always presented as a “ conspiracy theory ” and never really discussed or addressed properly by mainstream media .
It ’ s time to truly begin having serious conversations about controversial topics and learning to empathize with differing positions on them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ an all-time high , and if we are constantly divided and unable to perceive reality from the perspective of anybody else we are going to struggle to create meaningful change .
This is both a time to consume information and to develop ourselves personally to become effective changemakers .

Throughout history global chaos has always been used as a precursor to big change on our planet. Sometimes many of these changes are done under the guise of good will, where the initiators of these measures claim they are doing it for humanities best interests. We saw this, for example, when NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden exposed the extent of surveillance that’s conducted by the U.S. government, measures put in place that are supposedly for our protection. Snowden has recently expressed his opinion that COVID-19 is being used by governments to grab even more power and take away many of our basic rights and freedoms. This seems to be a common theme also expressed by many when it comes to what’s called “The Great Reset.”
What is “The Great Reset?” It’s an initiative that’s been started by the World Economic Forum (WEF). The House of Windsor, and the UN are prime executive co-producers. It was the title of a book that was published by WEF founder Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret earlier this year. Top sponsors include BP, Mastercard and Microsoft. According to them, “There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.” Ameriwood Home Carver ... Best Price: $94.89 Buy New $141.05 (as of 05:16 UTC - Details)
I am not going to go into great detail here about The Great Reset, as I recently published an essay on it doing just that titled COVID-19: A Precursor To A ‘New World Order?’ aka “The Great Reset.” You can refer to it if interested as it’s a much deeper discussion on the topic. With this piece I simply wanted to share the opinion of Alberta Premier, Jason Kenney, and encourage people to ask themselves why controversial topics are always presented as a “conspiracy theory” and never really discussed or addressed properly by mainstream media.
It’s time to truly begin having serious conversations about controversial topics and learning to empathize with differing positions on them. The need for collective sensemaking is at an all-time high, and if we are constantly divided and unable to perceive reality from the perspective of anybody else we are going to struggle to create meaningful change. This is both a time to consume information and to develop ourselves personally to become effective changemakers.
Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.


lewrockwell--2020-12-09--Disunited States of America: Texas Contests Election Results in Battleground States in Supreme Court

Donald Trump handily won the state of Texas and its 38 electoral votes on 3 November , gathering about 631,000 more votes than his Democratic rival , Joe Biden .
Trump , who trails Biden 232 electoral votes to 306 ( with 270 needed to win ) refuses to concede the race , claiming widespread fraud involving mail-in ballots across multiple states .
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania and Wisconsin with the United States Supreme Court , accusing the states of willfully “ exploiting ” the coronavirus pandemic “ to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and unlawfully enacting last-minute changes , thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election.
” VASAGLE Industrial Cof ... Best Price : $ 53.65 Buy New $ 98.34 Accusing officials in Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania and Wisconsin of “ destroying ” Americans ’ trust in the electoral process and “ compromise [ ing ] the security and integrity of the 2020 election , ” Paxton alleged that these states violated statues approved by their own legislatures , and in so doing , were unconstitutional .
The Texas attorney general ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failures by the Trump campaign to get state courts in the contested states to hear their cases .
In an interview with Fox News late last month , President Trump alleged that his team was not being allowed to “ put in our proof ” in state courts , and said he would prefer for his lawyers to file “ one nice , big , beautiful lawsuit with tremendous proof ” based on “ hundreds and hundreds of affidavits.
” Giantex Armchair Multi ... Buy New $ 189.99 In the interview , Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s fraud claims could even reach the Supreme Court .
“ The problem is it ’ s hard to get into the Supreme Court .
I ’ ve got the best Supreme Court advocates that want to argue the case if it gets there .
But they said it ’ s very hard to get a case up there , ” he said .
On Monday , Texas Senator Ted Cruz announced that he would be happy to present oral arguments before the Supreme Court on a Trump campaign election fraud-related case on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting .
Trump has spent much of the last month accusing Democratic rivals of large-scale voter fraud in Democrat-governed precincts in battleground states , blaming mass dumps of mail-in votes in the early morning hours of the day after the election for turning his early lead into a loss .
The president ’ s complaining about mail-in votes goes back to the summer of 2020 and the introduction of mass early mail-in voting , ostensibly over health concerns related to the coronavirus pandemic .
Dismissing the mass mail-in voting system as a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control , ” Trump warned in September that there may not be any “ transfer of power ” to his Democratic rival if he was cheated out of the election .
Democratic lawmakers accused Trump of using the mail-in vote issue as an excuse to try to stay in power if he lost .

Donald Trump handily won the state of Texas and its 38 electoral votes on 3 November, gathering about 631,000 more votes than his Democratic rival, Joe Biden. Trump, who trails Biden 232 electoral votes to 306 (with 270 needed to win) refuses to concede the race, claiming widespread fraud involving mail-in ballots across multiple states.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin with the United States Supreme Court, accusing the states of willfully “exploiting” the coronavirus pandemic “to justify ignoring federal and state election laws and unlawfully enacting last-minute changes, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election.” VASAGLE Industrial Cof... Best Price: $53.65 Buy New $98.34 (as of 05:18 UTC - Details)
“The battleground states flooded their people with unlawful ballot applications and ballots while ignoring statutory requirements as to how they were received, evaluated and counted,” a statement put out by his office Tuesday said.
Accusing officials in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin of “destroying” Americans’ trust in the electoral process and “compromise[ing] the security and integrity of the 2020 election,” Paxton alleged that these states violated statues approved by their own legislatures, and in so doing, were unconstitutional.
“Their failure to abide by the rule of law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election. We now ask that the Supreme Court step in to correct this egregious error,” the attorney general alleged.
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 The state of Texas has sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania & Wisconsin over election irregularities! This means Texas will have original jurisdiction to go directly to the Supreme Court‼ HUGE ⬇ pic.twitter.com/2LqpQ4Ym6y — Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) December 8, 2020
The Texas attorney general’s move comes in the wake of multiple failures by the Trump campaign to get state courts in the contested states to hear their cases.
In an interview with Fox News late last month, President Trump alleged that his team was not being allowed to “put in our proof” in state courts, and said he would prefer for his lawyers to file “one nice, big, beautiful lawsuit with tremendous proof” based on “hundreds and hundreds of affidavits.” Giantex Armchair Multi... Buy New $189.99 (as of 05:18 UTC - Details)
In the interview, Trump expressed doubts about whether his campaign’s fraud claims could even reach the Supreme Court. “The problem is it’s hard to get into the Supreme Court. I’ve got the best Supreme Court advocates that want to argue the case if it gets there. But they said it’s very hard to get a case up there,” he said.
On Monday, Texas Senator Ted Cruz announced that he would be happy to present oral arguments before the Supreme Court on a Trump campaign election fraud-related case on Pennsylvania on the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in voting.
Trump has spent much of the last month accusing Democratic rivals of large-scale voter fraud in Democrat-governed precincts in battleground states, blaming mass dumps of mail-in votes in the early morning hours of the day after the election for turning his early lead into a loss.
The president’s complaining about mail-in votes goes back to the summer of 2020 and the introduction of mass early mail-in voting, ostensibly over health concerns related to the coronavirus pandemic. Dismissing the mass mail-in voting system as a “disaster” that was “out of control,” Trump warned in September that there may not be any “transfer of power” to his Democratic rival if he was cheated out of the election. Democratic lawmakers accused Trump of using the mail-in vote issue as an excuse to try to stay in power if he lost.
Reprinted from Sputnik News.


lewrockwell--2020-12-09--40 Acres and a Mall

40 Acres and a Mall

Sometimes you chase the story , and sometimes the story chases you .
Two weeks ago I ’ m walkin ’ through Century City , the business , residential , and dining district adjoining Beverly Hills .
This is familiar territory to me ; it ’ s home .
So I know when something ’ s not right .
Like the bus full of black folks that came barreling past me down Avenue of the Stars .
And not just any bus ; one of those supersize air-conditioned bathroom-in-the-back buses .
I ’ m not a man who speaks in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ll stand by : If a bus full of black people enters an upscale area and nobody on board is wearing a jersey , it ’ s bad news .
And bad news it was .
The bus shat out BLM like a BM .
Dozens of angry blacks with placards and bullhorns bellowing , “ Whose streets ?
Our streets !
” As the crowd gathered in front of a high-rise office building , I approached one of the protesters .
Walker Edison Furnitur ... Buy New $ 197.99 “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face-to-face with a racis ’ Jew gentrifier.
” It was only out of self-preservation that I didn ’ t answer , “ Mission accomplished ; what can I do for you ?
” I ’ ll go a long way for a laugh , but not that far .
So here ’ s the gist of the protest .
As I ’ ve mentioned in previous columns , L.A. ’ s black population has dwindled to just a few remaining areas that could realistically be called “ black communities.
” It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ south and east of the prosperous Westside and stretches farther south beyond LAX .
But those communities are placeholders , destined to be either Hispanic or gentrified within the next decade .
And blacks know this .
Now , in that “ black belt ” there ’ s a shopping mall that ’ s often described as L.A. ’ s last “ black ” mall—the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza on Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd .
It ’ s seen better days , as has the area around it , a skid row @ @ @ @ @ @ @ check cashing places , hair extension parlors , and fast-food joints .
As for the mall itself , it lost its anchor stores years ago , and there are as many empty retail spaces as occupied .
All looked good .
One spiffy new mall coming up !
But then on May 25 a Minneapolis fentanyl freak stopped breathing , and L.A. BLM decided that no “ white ” or “ Jew ” firms should be allowed to own L.A. ’ s last black mall .
Facing protests , CIM turned chicken so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as if finishing a bucket meal .
CIM apologized , screamed “ Defund the police , ” and pulled out of the deal .
And the asking price of the mall fell considerably .
It was now a “ troubled property.
” Months went by with no serious bids .
In October , in stepped a new Jew , Asher Abehsera , and his billion-dollar urban development company LIVWRK .
Abehsera put in a bid of $ 100 million , and the owners , who at this point really wanted to be free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pledged to redevelop the mall with the community in mind .
He promised to add housing to the property and consult with community leaders about the look and feel of the renovations .
Following my Century City encounter with the picketers , I began monitoring the Instagram accounts of the “ defend Crenshaw Mall ” BLM activists .
And I saw their call to action to descend upon Abehsera ’ s house .
“ If we ’ re not sleeping because he ’ s trying to take over OUR neighborhood , we ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sleeping in HIS neighborhood either , ” one post declared .
I recall reading that and thinking , “ I sure feel bad for the poor bastards who live next door to THAT guy !
” Then I saw the address of the protest .
As I said , sometimes you chase the story , and sometimes the story chases you .
So , we had a BLM aktion in my neighborhood a week ago , and it was instructive .
It proved a point I made in this column back in October @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longer has the size or vigor to protest without the help of imbecilic white leftists .
And Antifa doesn ’ t give two craps about the Baldwin-Crenshaw Mall .
With no skinny-jeans white commies taking part , what showed up outside Asher Abehsera ’ s house was a weak , sclerotic mess of about forty black folks and maybe six white sympathizers who barely had the energy to march in a circle for an hour before calling it a day .

Sometimes you chase the story, and sometimes the story chases you.
Two weeks ago I’m walkin’ through Century City, the business, residential, and dining district adjoining Beverly Hills. This is familiar territory to me; it’s home. So I know when something’s not right. Like the bus full of black folks that came barreling past me down Avenue of the Stars. And not just any bus; one of those supersize air-conditioned bathroom-in-the-back buses.
I’m not a man who speaks in absolutes, but here’s one I’ll stand by: If a bus full of black people enters an upscale area and nobody on board is wearing a jersey, it’s bad news.
And bad news it was. The bus shat out BLM like a BM. Dozens of angry blacks with placards and bullhorns bellowing, “Whose streets? Our streets!”
As the crowd gathered in front of a high-rise office building, I approached one of the protesters. Walker Edison Furnitur... Buy New $197.99 (as of 05:19 UTC - Details)
“What’s up?”
“Man, we tryin’ to get face-to-face with a racis’ Jew gentrifier.”
It was only out of self-preservation that I didn’t answer, “Mission accomplished; what can I do for you?”
I’ll go a long way for a laugh, but not that far.
So here’s the gist of the protest. As I’ve mentioned in previous columns, L.A.’s black population has dwindled to just a few remaining areas that could realistically be called “black communities.” It’s a “black belt” that starts south and east of the prosperous Westside and stretches farther south beyond LAX. But those communities are placeholders, destined to be either Hispanic or gentrified within the next decade. And blacks know this.
Now, in that “black belt” there’s a shopping mall that’s often described as L.A.’s last “black” mall—the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza on Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. It’s seen better days, as has the area around it, a skid row of liquor stores, smoke shops, check cashing places, hair extension parlors, and fast-food joints. As for the mall itself, it lost its anchor stores years ago, and there are as many empty retail spaces as occupied.
However, a new light rail line is opening soon that will connect the mall to other parts of the city. And structurally the mall is quite sound; it just needs a face-lift. Which is exactly what a New York investment firm was planning to give it. In April, CIM Group (led by cofounder and principal Avi Shemesh) bid $130 million for the mall, and the bid was accepted by the investment fund that owns the property (a fund with a black CEO, for the record).
All looked good. One spiffy new mall coming up!
But then on May 25 a Minneapolis fentanyl freak stopped breathing, and L.A. BLM decided that no “white” or “Jew” firms should be allowed to own L.A.’s last black mall. Facing protests, CIM turned chicken so fast, BLM thugs licked their fingers as if finishing a bucket meal. CIM apologized, screamed “Defund the police,” and pulled out of the deal.
And the asking price of the mall fell considerably. It was now a “troubled property.” Months went by with no serious bids.
In October, in stepped a new Jew, Asher Abehsera, and his billion-dollar urban development company LIVWRK. Abehsera put in a bid of $100 million, and the owners, who at this point really wanted to be free of the hassle, accepted. Abehsera pledged to redevelop the mall with the community in mind. He promised to add housing to the property and consult with community leaders about the look and feel of the renovations.
So of course BLM declared war on Abehsera. That’s why the activists were in Century City that day; they were picketing his high-rise office . Abehsera has three strikes against him: He’s white (to blacks, Jews are white), he’s Jewish (to blacks, Jews are “worse whites”), and he’s “right-wing” (he partnered with Jared Kushner on a few real estate ventures a decade ago, so to the mob, that makes him a “Trump Jew”). When the protesters were unable to breach the office tower, they hatched a new plan: They’d hit Abehsera at home; they’d lead an assault on his neighborhood.
Following my Century City encounter with the picketers, I began monitoring the Instagram accounts of the “defend Crenshaw Mall” BLM activists. And I saw their call to action to descend upon Abehsera’s house. “If we’re not sleeping because he’s trying to take over OUR neighborhood, we’ll make sure he’s not sleeping in HIS neighborhood either,” one post declared.
I recall reading that and thinking, “I sure feel bad for the poor bastards who live next door to THAT guy!”
Then I saw the address of the protest.
Oh fuck me, he’s a neighbor.
As I said, sometimes you chase the story, and sometimes the story chases you.
So, we had a BLM aktion in my neighborhood a week ago, and it was instructive. It proved a point I made in this column back in October. The black community in L.A. no longer has the size or vigor to protest without the help of imbecilic white leftists. And Antifa doesn’t give two craps about the Baldwin-Crenshaw Mall. With no skinny-jeans white commies taking part, what showed up outside Asher Abehsera’s house was a weak, sclerotic mess of about forty black folks and maybe six white sympathizers who barely had the energy to march in a circle for an hour before calling it a day.
Read the Whole Article