lewrockwell--2020-08-25--Quercetin and Vitamin C: Synergistic Therapy for Covid19

Quercetin was initially found to provide broad-spectrum protection against SARS coronavirus in the aftermath of the SARS epidemic that broke out across 26 countries in 2003.1,2,3 Now , some doctors are advocating its use against SARS-CoV-2 , in combination with vitamin C , noting that the two have synergistic effects .
Incidentally , ascorbic acid ( vitamin C ) and the bioflavonoid quercetin ( originally labeled vitamin P ) were both discovered by the same scientist — Nobel prize winner Albert Szent-Györgyi.4,5 Quercetin ’ s antiviral capacity has been attributed to five main mechanisms of action : • Inhibiting the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transporting zinc across cellular membranes • Promoting SIRT2 , thereby inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome assembly involved with COVID-19 infection Similarly , vitamin C at extremely high doses also acts as an antiviral drug , effectively inactivating viruses .
During the 2003 SARS pandemic , a Finnish researcher called6 for an investigation into the use of vitamin C after research showed it not only protected broiler chicks against avian coronavirus , but also cut the duration and severity of common cold in humans and significantly lowered susceptibility to pneumonia .
While high-dose vitamin C @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s been used as a treatment for sepsis since about 2017 .
The vitamin C-based sepsis treatment was developed by Dr. Paul Marik , a critical care doctor at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in East Virginia , which has since adopted it as standard of care for sepsis .
In the interview above , Marik explains how the COVID-19 critical care protocol grew out of his sepsis treatment , as he and other doctors noticed there were many similarities between sepsis and severe COVID-19 infection , in particular the out-of-control inflammatory cascade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 28.95 ( $ 0.12 / Count ) To address the differences between the two conditions , a group of doctors , including Marik , founded the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group7 ( FLCCC ) , and began developing a modified protocol specifically for COVID-19 .
The original protocol for COVID-19 is detailed in “ COVID-19 Critical Care.
” Known as the MATH+ protocol,8,9 it involves the use of three key medicines , all of which need to be started within six hours of hospital admission : • Intravenous methylprednisolone , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organ damage from cytokine storms • Intravenous ascorbic acid ( vitamin C ) , to control inflammation and prevent the development of leaky blood vessels in the lungs • Subcutaneous heparin ( enoxaparin ) , to thin the blood and prevent blood clots The initial MATH+ protocol10 was released in April 2020 .
In early July and August , it was updated11,12 to include quercetin and a number of optional nutrients and drugs , not only for critical care but also for prophylaxis and mild disease being treated at home .
• Zinc @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or picolinate ) .
Zinc lozenges are preferred .
After one month , reduce the dose to 30 mg to 50 mg per day • Melatonin ( slow release ) — Begin with 0.3 mg and increase as tolerated to 2 mg at night The at-home treatment for mildly symptomatic patients is very similar , but adds several optional drugs , including aspirin ( ASA ) , famotidine ( an antacid ) , ivermectin ( a heartworm medication that has been shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro14 ) .
( For dosages @ @ @ @ @ @ @ summary , available on the Easter Virginia Medical School ’ s site . )
Amazing Formulas - Que ... Best Price : null Buy New null They also recommend monitoring your oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter and to go to the hospital if you get below 94 % .
The medical evidence to support each drug and nutrient can be found under “ Medical Evidence ” 16 on the FLCCC ’ s website .
In July , the in-hospital protocol was revised17 again to include thiamine ( which is also a key @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
As of the last revision , the in-hospital MATH+ protocol18 calls for : According to the FLCCC , “ By initiating the protocol soon after a patient meets criteria for oxygen supplementation , the need for mechanical ventilators and ICU beds will decrease dramatically.
” While heparin is an important part of the protocol due to the clotting complications in the microvasculature of the lung , it is likely that N-acetyl cysteine ( NAC ) is likely a far better choice as it is far safer and likely as effective .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Treatments This is a key point : There are two distinct phases or stages of COVID-19 — the viral replication stage and the immune dysfunction stage — and the treatment must be appropriate for the stage you ’ re in .
Equally crucial is starting aggressive treatment as early as possible .
The graphic below details the two stages of disease , and the FLCCC ’ s suggested treatment focus for each .
Zinc with Quercetin Se ... Buy New $ 24.95 ( $ 0.21 / Count ) Peak viral replication takes place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which include cold/flu-like symptoms , loss of taste and smell , myalgia ( muscle pain ) and general malaise .
From the time of symptom onset to the time that immune dysregulation starts to set in ( accompanied by worsening symptoms ) is about five or six days .
During this time , you need to aggressively treat , whether you ’ re at home ( see the at-home treatment for symptomatic patients ) or in the hospital .
The key remedies in this phase are antivirals ( which is what vitamin C @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anti-inflammatories should be avoided in this phase , Marik warns .
Again , if treating at home , be sure to monitor your oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter .
If your oxygen drops to 94 % or below when sitting or walking , it ’ s time to go to the hospital .
If your immune system is unable to successfully combat the virus , then five to six days after first symptoms , early pulmonary dysfunction can set in .
At this point , anti-inflammatories — i.e.
, corticosteroids — and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ important concept explained by Marik in the featured interview is that the inflammatory response rises as the viral load decreases .
They do not rise together .
“ So , it ’ s really not the virus that is causing cytopathic effects , ” he says .
By the time you enter the pulmonary phase of the disease , your viral load has actually significantly decreased , but for some reason the inflammatory response then starts to run amok .
Your oxygen saturation is “ the key indicator of pulmonary involvement , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ starts to decline , you are entering the early pulmonary phase where inflammation is rapidly increasing .
This is why it ’ s so important to make sure you ’ re measuring your oxygen saturation .
Do not try to treat at home if your oxygen is dropping .
Go to the hospital .
Again , early treatment is crucial .
Hopefully , your doctor will be willing to implement the MATH+ protocol .
DACHA Nutrition Natura ...
Check Amazon for Pricing .
In a short essay19 co-written by the entire FLCCC team @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MATH+ protocol is one of the best , most effective , critical care protocols for COVID-19 to date .
The essay20 stresses the importance of corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19 , and cites results from the RECOVERY trial,21,22,23 a large , randomized controlled COVID-19 study by the University of Oxford , that validates their recommendation to use corticosteroids as soon as the patient is hospitalized .
In that study , the corticosteroid dexamethasone improved survival by one-third in ventilated patients and one-fifth in those requiring oxygen .
However , the FLCCC believes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a better , more effective , choice .
First , because it reaches higher concentrations in lung tissue , and secondly , because it most closely matches the inflammatory gene activation patterns induced by SARS-CoV-2 .
They also believe the dexamethasone dose used in the RECOVERY trial was too low , especially for severe cases .
June 19 , 2020 , Marik published the paper,25 “ Quercetin and Vitamin C : An Experimental , Synergistic Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Related Disease ( COVID-19 ) ” in the journal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The paper presents evidence for the use of vitamin C and quercetin — based on their biological actions and pharmacokinetics profiles — both as prophylaxis in high-risk populations , and as an adjunct to drugs such as Remdesivir or convalescent plasma in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients .
In the interview , Marik also addresses the issue of “ post-COVID syndrome , ” which he says is very similar to that of post-sepsis syndrome .
In some cases , COVID-19 patients have recovered from the infection , only to die due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lungs ) or other organ dysfunction .
Marik suspects this is because the inflammatory response is still overactive .
Many sepsis patients will have very high cytokine levels even a year after their recovery .
He believes steroids are one key to downregulating the inflammatory response , which would prevent this problem .
A good way to screen for this , Marik says , is to measure CRP , which appear to be a good marker for ongoing inflammation .
If CRP is high after recovering from COVID-19 , Marik suggests doing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inflammatory response .
Aspirin may also be helpful if D-dimer is high .
These should be used under medical supervision .
I believe this information needs to be shared far and wide , if we are to prevent more people from dying unnecessarily .
More and more , as doctors are starting to speak openly about their clinical findings , we see there are quite a few different ways to tackle this illness without novel antivirals or vaccines , using older , inexpensive and readily available medications and nutrients that are already known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joseph Mercola

Quercetin was initially found to provide broad-spectrum protection against SARS coronavirus in the aftermath of the SARS epidemic that broke out across 26 countries in 2003.1,2,3 Now, some doctors are advocating its use against SARS-CoV-2, in combination with vitamin C, noting that the two have synergistic effects.
Incidentally, ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and the bioflavonoid quercetin (originally labeled vitamin P) were both discovered by the same scientist — Nobel prize winner Albert Szent-Györgyi.4,5 Quercetin’s antiviral capacity has been attributed to five main mechanisms of action:
Inhibiting the virus’ ability to infect cells by transporting zinc across cellular membranes Inhibiting replication of already infected cells Reducing infected cells’ resistance to treatment with antiviral medication Inhibiting platelet aggregation — and many COVID-19 patients suffer abnormal blood clotting Promoting SIRT2, thereby inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome assembly involved with COVID-19 infection
Similarly, vitamin C at extremely high doses also acts as an antiviral drug, effectively inactivating viruses. During the 2003 SARS pandemic, a Finnish researcher called6 for an investigation into the use of vitamin C after research showed it not only protected broiler chicks against avian coronavirus, but also cut the duration and severity of common cold in humans and significantly lowered susceptibility to pneumonia.
The MATH+ Protocol
While high-dose vitamin C is new for COVID-19 treatment, it’s been used as a treatment for sepsis since about 2017. The vitamin C-based sepsis treatment was developed by Dr. Paul Marik, a critical care doctor at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in East Virginia, which has since adopted it as standard of care for sepsis.
In the interview above, Marik explains how the COVID-19 critical care protocol grew out of his sepsis treatment, as he and other doctors noticed there were many similarities between sepsis and severe COVID-19 infection, in particular the out-of-control inflammatory cascade. NatureBell Quercetin 1... Buy New $28.95 ($0.12 / Count) (as of 04:29 UTC - Details)
To address the differences between the two conditions, a group of doctors, including Marik, founded the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group7 (FLCCC), and began developing a modified protocol specifically for COVID-19.
The original protocol for COVID-19 is detailed in “COVID-19 Critical Care.” Known as the MATH+ protocol,8,9 it involves the use of three key medicines, all of which need to be started within six hours of hospital admission:
Intravenous methylprednisolone , to suppress the immune system and prevent organ damage from cytokine storms
, to suppress the immune system and prevent organ damage from cytokine storms Intravenous ascorbic acid (vitamin C) , to control inflammation and prevent the development of leaky blood vessels in the lungs
, to control inflammation and prevent the development of leaky blood vessels in the lungs Subcutaneous heparin (enoxaparin), to thin the blood and prevent blood clots
MATH+ Prophylactic and At-Home Treatment Protocol
The initial MATH+ protocol10 was released in April 2020. In early July and August, it was updated11,12 to include quercetin and a number of optional nutrients and drugs, not only for critical care but also for prophylaxis and mild disease being treated at home.
There is evidence that vitamin C and quercetin co-administration exerts a synergistic antiviral action due to overlapping antiviral and immunomodulatory properties and the capacity of ascorbate to recycle quercetin, increasing its efficacy.
For prophylaxis, the FLCCC recommends:13
Vitamin C — 500 mg
Quercetin — 250 mg to 500 mg
Zinc — 75-100 mg/day (acetate, gluconate or picolinate). Zinc lozenges are preferred. After one month, reduce the dose to 30 mg to 50 mg per day
Melatonin (slow release) — Begin with 0.3 mg and increase as tolerated to 2 mg at night
Vitamin D3 — 1,000 to 4,000 IUs per day
The at-home treatment for mildly symptomatic patients is very similar, but adds several optional drugs, including aspirin (ASA), famotidine (an antacid), ivermectin (a heartworm medication that has been shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro14). (For dosages, see the Critical Care Management Protocol15 summary, available on the Easter Virginia Medical School’s site.) Amazing Formulas - Que... Check Amazon for Pricing.
They also recommend monitoring your oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter and to go to the hospital if you get below 94%. The medical evidence to support each drug and nutrient can be found under “Medical Evidence”16 on the FLCCC’s website.
MATH+ Critical Care In-Hospital Protocol
In July, the in-hospital protocol was revised17 again to include thiamine (which is also a key ingredient in Marik’s sepsis protocol). As of the last revision, the in-hospital MATH+ protocol18 calls for:
IV methylprednisone
High-dose ascorbic acid (vitamin C)
Thiamine
Heparin
Optional: melatonin, zinc, vitamin D3, atorvastatin, famotidine and magnesium
According to the FLCCC, “By initiating the protocol soon after a patient meets criteria for oxygen supplementation, the need for mechanical ventilators and ICU beds will decrease dramatically.” While heparin is an important part of the protocol due to the clotting complications in the microvasculature of the lung, it is likely that N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is likely a far better choice as it is far safer and likely as effective.
The Two Phases of Disease Require Different Treatments
This is a key point: There are two distinct phases or stages of COVID-19 — the viral replication stage and the immune dysfunction stage — and the treatment must be appropriate for the stage you’re in. Equally crucial is starting aggressive treatment as early as possible. The graphic below details the two stages of disease, and the FLCCC’s suggested treatment focus for each. Zinc with Quercetin Se... Buy New $24.95 ($0.21 / Count) (as of 05:20 UTC - Details)
Peak viral replication takes place at the earliest signs of symptoms, which include cold/flu-like symptoms, loss of taste and smell, myalgia (muscle pain) and general malaise.
From the time of symptom onset to the time that immune dysregulation starts to set in (accompanied by worsening symptoms) is about five or six days. During this time, you need to aggressively treat, whether you’re at home (see the at-home treatment for symptomatic patients) or in the hospital.
The key remedies in this phase are antivirals (which is what vitamin C, quercetin and zinc are). Anti-inflammatories should be avoided in this phase, Marik warns. Again, if treating at home, be sure to monitor your oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter. If your oxygen drops to 94% or below when sitting or walking, it’s time to go to the hospital.
If your immune system is unable to successfully combat the virus, then five to six days after first symptoms, early pulmonary dysfunction can set in. At this point, anti-inflammatories — i.e., corticosteroids — and immune suppressive therapeutics are required.
Viral Load Declines as Inflammation Rises
Another important concept explained by Marik in the featured interview is that the inflammatory response rises as the viral load decreases. They do not rise together.
“So, it’s really not the virus that is causing cytopathic effects,” he says. By the time you enter the pulmonary phase of the disease, your viral load has actually significantly decreased, but for some reason the inflammatory response then starts to run amok.
Your oxygen saturation is “the key indicator of pulmonary involvement,” Marik says. Once your oxygen saturation starts to decline, you are entering the early pulmonary phase where inflammation is rapidly increasing.
This is why it’s so important to make sure you’re measuring your oxygen saturation. Do not try to treat at home if your oxygen is dropping. Go to the hospital. Again, early treatment is crucial. Hopefully, your doctor will be willing to implement the MATH+ protocol.
Corticosteroids Are a Crucial Component
In a short essay19 co-written by the entire FLCCC team, they express their conviction that the MATH+ protocol is one of the best, most effective, critical care protocols for COVID-19 to date.
“Months ago, early on in COVID19, the FLCCC created the MATH+ protocol based on our physicians’ insights into COVID19 as a steroid-responsive disease.
This treatment recommendation went against all the major national and international health care societies that had misinterpreted the medical literature, a body of published evidence which, upon careful and deep review, actually supported the use of corticosteroids in prior pandemics …
Thousands of patients who became critically ill with Covid19 and who were suffering from massive inflammation may have been saved if this safe and powerful anti-inflammatory medicine had been provided.”
The essay20 stresses the importance of corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19, and cites results from the RECOVERY trial,21,22,23 a large, randomized controlled COVID-19 study by the University of Oxford, that validates their recommendation to use corticosteroids as soon as the patient is hospitalized.
In that study, the corticosteroid dexamethasone improved survival by one-third in ventilated patients and one-fifth in those requiring oxygen. However, the FLCCC believes another type of corticosteroid, methylprednisolone, is a better, more effective, choice.
First, because it reaches higher concentrations in lung tissue, and secondly, because it most closely matches the inflammatory gene activation patterns induced by SARS-CoV-2. They also believe the dexamethasone dose used in the RECOVERY trial was too low, especially for severe cases.
“In the hospitals of two of our FLCCC physicians — each having treated over 100 hospitalized patients with MATH+ often early on in the hospitalization, the hospital mortality rate to date is 7% in one hospital (Dr. Paul Marik, Norfolk, Va.) and less than 1% in the other (Dr. Joseph Varon, Houston, Texas),” the essay states.24
Vitamin C and Quercetin Work Synergistically
June 19, 2020, Marik published the paper,25 “Quercetin and Vitamin C: An Experimental, Synergistic Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Related Disease (COVID-19)” in the journal Frontiers in Immunology, which notes:
“Ascorbic acid is a crucial vitamin necessary for the correct functioning of the immune system. It plays a role in stress response and has shown promising results when administered to the critically ill. Quercetin is a well-known flavonoid whose antiviral properties have been investigated in numerous studies.
There is evidence that vitamin C and quercetin co-administration exerts a synergistic antiviral action due to overlapping antiviral and immunomodulatory properties and the capacity of ascorbate to recycle quercetin, increasing its efficacy.
Safe, cheap interventions which have a sound biological rationale should be prioritized for experimental use in the current context of a global health pandemic.”
The paper presents evidence for the use of vitamin C and quercetin — based on their biological actions and pharmacokinetics profiles — both as prophylaxis in high-risk populations, and as an adjunct to drugs such as Remdesivir or convalescent plasma in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Post-COVID Syndrome
In the interview, Marik also addresses the issue of “post-COVID syndrome,” which he says is very similar to that of post-sepsis syndrome. In some cases, COVID-19 patients have recovered from the infection, only to die due to pulmonary embolism (blood clots in the lungs) or other organ dysfunction.
Marik suspects this is because the inflammatory response is still overactive. Many sepsis patients will have very high cytokine levels even a year after their recovery. He believes steroids are one key to downregulating the inflammatory response, which would prevent this problem.
A good way to screen for this, Marik says, is to measure CRP, which appear to be a good marker for ongoing inflammation. If CRP is high after recovering from COVID-19, Marik suggests doing a short course of corticosteroids to downregulate the inflammatory response. Aspirin may also be helpful if D-dimer is high. These should be used under medical supervision.
I believe this information needs to be shared far and wide, if we are to prevent more people from dying unnecessarily. More and more, as doctors are starting to speak openly about their clinical findings, we see there are quite a few different ways to tackle this illness without novel antivirals or vaccines, using older, inexpensive and readily available medications and nutrients that are already known to be safe.
Sources and References
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola


lewrockwell--2020-08-27--The Really Scary Part

The Really Scary Part

PLANDEMIC is an epic film documentary about covert efforts to create and spread a mutated respiratory virus in the world , brought to you by The World Health Organization and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation , two organizations steeped in financial conflicts of interest , the latter masquerading as a philanthropic org .
Who in the world hasn ’ t been deluged with often confusing and contrary information since this pandemic officially began in late 2019 in Wuhan , China ?
Lockdown “ flattens the curve.
” Masks block spread of infection .
Or do they ?
Social distancing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ airborne range of the virus expelled when coughing .
But studies say viral particles are airborne up to 12 feet .
Yes , but you will forever be vulnerable to this virus if you don ’ t get exposed to it and develop natural antibodies .
Why wait for a problematic vaccine when your ( healthy ) body will develop antibodies on its own ?
Studies show that is precisely what has happened in Sweden , a country that did not lockdown or mandate face masks .
Contagion Myth : Why Vi ... @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 22.49 Whatever health practices are implemented out of fear may never be abandoned regardless of the contrary facts Despite errant health advice about mask wearing , lockdowns and social distancing , once these practices were instilled by fear , it would now be almost impossible to abandon them since they provided peace of mind in a world without a licensed vaccine .
Countries that habitually wear masks @ 90 % + of the time have high COVID-19 mortality rates ( examples : Chile , Bolivia , Guatemala ) .
Don ’ t tell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taking away their false props against this dreaded disease .
Governments managing epidemics use them to gain political capital The World Health Organization guidebook on how to handle epidemics forbids politicians from management epidemics .
That dictum is ignored in the US where governors of States have implemented draconian interpretations and practices on their residents .
What was needed were deaths , lots of deaths , to drive fear deep into the hearts of Americans .
Hospitals were given financial incentives to use reimbursement codes for COVID-19 .
More than 80 % of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , diabetes and autoimmunity .
Only 20 % of deaths are due to COVID-19 coronavirus alone .
Subtract 80 % of the reported COVID-19 deaths and you don ’ t have a scary pandemic .
Governors transferred COVID-19 infected patients from hospitals to nursing homes , a murderous error that resulted in many thousands of needless deaths .
Governors were over-counting deaths in hopes the mounting body bags would unseat a standing President from re-election .
The public was no wiser because the news media , pitched against the Executive Branch of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blame game against the President .
WARNING TO THE WEST Solzhenitsyn , Aleksandr Best Price : $ 11.00 Buy New $ 16.00 Once the scaremongering World Health Organization ushered in coercive voluntary lockdowns , mask wearing and anti-septic practices , these morphed into guidelines by public health agencies that news media then presented as legal mandates .
These practices were intended to keep so-called natural herd immunity from occurring and left the masses free of infection but no natural antibodies against the deadly virus .
The entire population of the world was now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circulation , for which there was no vaccine .
But lockdowns were only completely practiced in areas like China , which Bill Gates applauded .
He was miffed Americans were getting infected and surviving a bout of coronavirus almost without symptoms .
This would foil efforts to prove a vaccine works .
Furthermore , the indoor lockdown resulted in the crashing of sunshine vitamin D blood levels , a hormone/nutrient that is produced in the skin and stored in the liver during summer months .
A wintertime vitamin D deficiency explains the seasonal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Now everyone would need to be vaccinated , but only as long as vitamin D pills were dismissed as a natural antidote .
Lockdowns destroyed businesses and left many millions with no future .
Live for today when there is no tomorrow .
What folly .
Social distancing and social gathering , particularly focused on churches , would keep the masses from developing their own narratives and create fear of each other .
The Problem of Politic ... Michael Huemer Best Price : $ 28.00 Buy New $ 33.99 Pre-planned phobia over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The world became phobic over an unseen virus that could even be spread by paper money .
Credit card companies were obviously behind that phobia and so was the World Economic Forum that wants to eradicate paper money and usher in a new worldwide digital currency in conjunction with Master Card , Microsoft and the International Monetary Fund , that has planned an economic reset for January 2021 .
In the process , hand sanitizer sales went through the roof .
But viruses aren ’ t even alive .
They are globs of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ living cell .
Belatedly the Centers For Disease Control issued a lone paragraph in its volumes of advice to say physical contact with the virus wasn ’ t the common way the disease is spread , which is by aerosol transmission from infected lung to uninfected lung of a vulnerable subject whose immune system is not up to par .
But it is too late .
Grocery stores are cleaning shopping carts and asking customers to only touch what they buy .
Actually , no one dies of the COVID-29 coronavirus if they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to handle public pushback part of their plan Public health agencies began discussion how to coerce a vaccine reluctant population to get immunized .
One such tactic is a vaccine passport , a document obtained by proof of antibodies against the COVID-19 coronavirus .
But then came an admission that health authorities had been hiding from the public since at least 1986 – zinc-dependent T cells , produced in the thymus gland , kill off virally infected cells in the lungs and elsewhere in the body , not antibodies .
So much for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The human body doesn ’ t make long-term antibodies against this or any coronavirus or influenza virus .
This would render vaccination of such temporary benefit that it would be more appropriate to boost immunity naturally with vitamins ( A , C , D ) and trace minerals selenium and zinc .
But what to do with the billion-dollar stockpile of vaccines ?
The Rape of the Mind : ... Joost A. M. Meerloo Best Price : $ 14.72 Buy New $ 2.99 Vaccines were purchased before proven safety and effectiveness Then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments released funds to vaccine makers to develop a vaccine under fast track provisions as the death counts and body bags supposedly mounted .
There are seven other coronaviruses and no vaccine has ever been developed against them .
Not to matter , governments issued purchase orders to “ vax-obscene fakers ” to make billions of doses of vaccines with a promised mandate the masses will have to get inoculated .
The vaccines aren ’ t even vetted for safety let along effectiveness , and they pharma companies are counting their profits .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ life has been saved .
The whole epidemic was scripted 5 months prior in EVENT 201 conducted at Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security in what was called a pandemic drill .
Preparedness plans include how to censor anyone who spread false rumor about the vaccine .
And now for the scary part Unreported Truths abou ... Berenson , Alex Buy New $ 5.99 And now for the scary part .
In the documentary film Plandemic , at about the 33:02-minute point , we learn that the World Health Organization ’ s GLOBAL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its report entitled WORLD AT RISK , calls for a “ simulation exercise ” that has now morphed into reality .
Theirs is a “ multi-year plan ” with “ progress indicators required by September 2020.
” Two pandemic exercises are planned ( WORLD AT RISK , Foreward , Page 8 ) .
“ The United Nations ( including WHO ) conducts at least two systemwide training and simulation exercises… ” by September 2020 .
One pandemic must be “ a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen… ” Now for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this prescient report , what is pandemic # 2 that is supposed to be unleashed by September 2020 ?
The Vitamin D Revoluti ... Soram Khalsa Best Price : $ 1.25 Buy New $ 10.69 Vitamin C : The Real St ... Steve Hickey , Andrew W ... Best Price : $ 8.91 Buy New $ 12.47 Organic Zinc Sulfate L ... Buy New $ 18.95 ( $ 4.74 / Fl Oz ) Vitamin D3 , Zinc and M ... Jeffers , Nancy Best Price : null Buy New $ 6.98

PLANDEMIC is an epic film documentary about covert efforts to create and spread a mutated respiratory virus in the world, brought to you by The World Health Organization and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, two organizations steeped in financial conflicts of interest, the latter masquerading as a philanthropic org.
Zig-zag health advice
Who in the world hasn’t been deluged with often confusing and contrary information since this pandemic officially began in late 2019 in Wuhan, China? Lockdown “flattens the curve.” Masks block spread of infection. Or do they? Social distancing (6 feet) is outside the airborne range of the virus expelled when coughing. But studies say viral particles are airborne up to 12 feet.
Yes, but you will forever be vulnerable to this virus if you don’t get exposed to it and develop natural antibodies. Why wait for a problematic vaccine when your (healthy) body will develop antibodies on its own? Studies show that is precisely what has happened in Sweden, a country that did not lockdown or mandate face masks. Contagion Myth: Why Vi... Fallon Morell, Sally Buy New $22.49 (as of 04:23 UTC - Details)
Whatever health practices are implemented out of fear may never be abandoned regardless of the contrary facts
Despite errant health advice about mask wearing, lockdowns and social distancing, once these practices were instilled by fear, it would now be almost impossible to abandon them since they provided peace of mind in a world without a licensed vaccine.
Countries that habitually wear masks @ 90%+ of the time have high COVID-19 mortality rates (examples: Chile, Bolivia, Guatemala). Don’t tell the people this. You’re taking away their false props against this dreaded disease.
Governments managing epidemics use them to gain political capital
The World Health Organization guidebook on how to handle epidemics forbids politicians from management epidemics. That dictum is ignored in the US where governors of States have implemented draconian interpretations and practices on their residents. What was needed were deaths, lots of deaths, to drive fear deep into the hearts of Americans.
Hospitals were given financial incentives to use reimbursement codes for COVID-19. More than 80% of COVID-19 deaths involve co-morbid conditions like obesity, diabetes and autoimmunity. Only 20% of deaths are due to COVID-19 coronavirus alone. Subtract 80% of the reported COVID-19 deaths and you don’t have a scary pandemic.
Governors transferred COVID-19 infected patients from hospitals to nursing homes, a murderous error that resulted in many thousands of needless deaths. Governors were over-counting deaths in hopes the mounting body bags would unseat a standing President from re-election. The public was no wiser because the news media, pitched against the Executive Branch of the Federal government, continues to practice a blame game against the President. WARNING TO THE WEST Solzhenitsyn, Aleksandr Best Price: $11.00 Buy New $16.00 (as of 02:40 UTC - Details)
Guidelines or legal mandates?
Once the scaremongering World Health Organization ushered in coercive voluntary lockdowns, mask wearing and anti-septic practices, these morphed into guidelines by public health agencies that news media then presented as legal mandates. These practices were intended to keep so-called natural herd immunity from occurring and left the masses free of infection but no natural antibodies against the deadly virus.
The entire population of the world was now vulnerable to the mutated respiratory virus in circulation, for which there was no vaccine.
But lockdowns were only completely practiced in areas like China, which Bill Gates applauded. He was miffed Americans were getting infected and surviving a bout of coronavirus almost without symptoms. This would foil efforts to prove a vaccine works.
Quash real remedies
Furthermore, the indoor lockdown resulted in the crashing of sunshine vitamin D blood levels, a hormone/nutrient that is produced in the skin and stored in the liver during summer months. A wintertime vitamin D deficiency explains the seasonal onset of infectious disease throughout the world. Now everyone would need to be vaccinated, but only as long as vitamin D pills were dismissed as a natural antidote.
Draconian lifesaving practices leave no remaining life to live
Lockdowns destroyed businesses and left many millions with no future. Live for today when there is no tomorrow. What folly.
Social distancing and social gathering, particularly focused on churches, would keep the masses from developing their own narratives and create fear of each other. The Problem of Politic... Michael Huemer Best Price: $28.00 Buy New $33.99 (as of 04:55 UTC - Details)
Pre-planned phobia over spread of the virus by paper money
The world became phobic over an unseen virus that could even be spread by paper money. Credit card companies were obviously behind that phobia and so was the World Economic Forum that wants to eradicate paper money and usher in a new worldwide digital currency in conjunction with Master Card, Microsoft and the International Monetary Fund, that has planned an economic reset for January 2021.
In the process, hand sanitizer sales went through the roof. But viruses aren’t even alive. They are globs of genetic information that only replicate inside a living cell. Belatedly the Centers For Disease Control issued a lone paragraph in its volumes of advice to say physical contact with the virus wasn’t the common way the disease is spread, which is by aerosol transmission from infected lung to uninfected lung of a vulnerable subject whose immune system is not up to par. But it is too late. Grocery stores are cleaning shopping carts and asking customers to only touch what they buy. Actually, no one dies of the COVID-29 coronavirus if they have a functioning immune system.
How to handle public pushback part of their plan
Public health agencies began discussion how to coerce a vaccine reluctant population to get immunized. One such tactic is a vaccine passport, a document obtained by proof of antibodies against the COVID-19 coronavirus. But then came an admission that health authorities had been hiding from the public since at least 1986 – zinc-dependent T cells, produced in the thymus gland, kill off virally infected cells in the lungs and elsewhere in the body, not antibodies. So much for a vaccine passport.
But it’s not antibodies
Then another admission. The human body doesn’t make long-term antibodies against this or any coronavirus or influenza virus. This would render vaccination of such temporary benefit that it would be more appropriate to boost immunity naturally with vitamins (A, C, D) and trace minerals selenium and zinc. But what to do with the billion-dollar stockpile of vaccines? The Rape of the Mind: ... Joost A. M. Meerloo Best Price: $14.72 Buy New $2.99 (as of 06:50 UTC - Details)
Vaccines were purchased before proven safety and effectiveness
Then given the contrived world health emergency, governments released funds to vaccine makers to develop a vaccine under fast track provisions as the death counts and body bags supposedly mounted. There are seven other coronaviruses and no vaccine has ever been developed against them.
Not to matter, governments issued purchase orders to “vax-obscene fakers” to make billions of doses of vaccines with a promised mandate the masses will have to get inoculated. The vaccines aren’t even vetted for safety let along effectiveness, and they pharma companies are counting their profits. Their stock prices are soaring before one life has been saved.
Scripted
The whole epidemic was scripted 5 months prior in EVENT 201 conducted at Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security in what was called a pandemic drill. Preparedness plans include how to censor anyone who spread false rumor about the vaccine.
And now for the scary part
Unreported Truths abou... Berenson, Alex Buy New $5.99 (as of 03:17 UTC - Details) And now for the scary part. In the documentary film Plandemic, at about the 33:02-minute point, we learn that the World Health Organization’s GLOBAL MONITORING PREPAREDNESS BOARD in 2019, in its report entitled WORLD AT RISK, calls for a “simulation exercise” that has now morphed into reality.
Theirs is a “multi-year plan” with “progress indicators required by September 2020.” Two pandemic exercises are planned (WORLD AT RISK, Foreward, Page 8). “The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two systemwide training and simulation exercises…” by September 2020. One pandemic must be “a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen…”
Now for the remaining question: As I write this prescient report, what is pandemic #2 that is supposed to be unleashed by September 2020?
The Vitamin D Revoluti... Soram Khalsa Best Price: $1.25 Buy New $10.69 (as of 08:00 UTC - Details) Vitamin C: The Real St... Steve Hickey, Andrew W... Best Price: $8.91 Buy New $12.47 (as of 10:10 UTC - Details) Organic Zinc Sulfate L... Buy New $18.95 ($4.74 / Fl Oz) (as of 02:28 UTC - Details) Vitamin D3, Zinc and M... Jeffers, Nancy Buy New $6.98 (as of 03:40 UTC - Details)


lewrockwell--2020-08-27--The Silver Market Is Manipulated

The Silver Market Is Manipulated

Idaho ’ s Silver Valley is a short drive from my hometown of Spokane , WA .
Perhaps the regional importance of silver mining helps explain my affinity for silver .
As a boy , growing up in the 1960s , I enjoyed finding silver dimes , quarters , and half-dollars when receiving change at local stores ; and I kept them knowing they were valuable .
Shortly after college , when a job transfer moved me to Boise , ID , in 1985 , I found myself purchasing 100-ounce silver bars directly from Sunshine Mining Company .
To me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currency for silver ; and , to this day , I view this as saving .
Through the years , nonetheless , something was gnawing at me regarding the silver market .
Silver ’ s price action seemed utterly strange ; as if there was an invisible , yet officially-sanctioned , hand manipulating it to keep it suppressed .
To be sure , there have been highly credible voices claiming manipulation ; and they weren ’ t just voices in my head imploring me to wear a tinfoil hat appropriate for inmates in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voices , recently , have been brought together in Chris Marcus ’ terrific new book The Big Silver Short .
During the period of 1990-1993 , silver often languished at prices below $ 4 per ounce .
It was great , nonetheless , to stack bars at bargain prices .
As for mainstream financial analysts , silver was a laughing stock during these years .
A common assertion was that silver , once a monetary metal , was now merely an industrial metal .
Hence , by their logic , there would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or stacking bars of silver .
I didn ’ t agree with the mainstream ’ s bad-mouthing of silver and I continued to view silver as both a commodity and a store of wealth .
The Big Silver Short : ... Marcus , Chris Buy New $ 20.65 Before going into details about The Big Silver Short , it is important to acknowledge public schools indoctrinate students with nonsense that money must be supplied and regulated by government .
From grade school to grad school , this was pounded into my head .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ my instincts said otherwise .
Following such instincts , I came to the conclusion mainstream economics is a dead end and that answers , about the nature of money , had to be found elsewhere .
Then , lo and behold , a friend introduced me to Austrian economics in 1995 .
Upon my introduction , to Austrian economics , one of the first books I read was Murray Rothbard ’ s What Has Government Done to Our Money ?
Regarding the emergence of money , here ’ s what I found on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Historically , many different goods have been used as media : tobacco in colonial Virginia , sugar in the West Indies , salt in Abyssinia , cattle in ancient Greece , nails in Scotland , copper in ancient Egypt , and grain , beads , tea , cowrie shells , and fish hooks .
Through the centuries , two commodities , gold and silver , have emerged as money in the free competition of the market , and have displaced the other commodities .
Both are uniquely marketable , are in great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other necessary qualities .
In recent times , silver , being relatively more abundant than gold , has been found more useful for smaller exchanges , while gold is more useful for larger transactions .
At any rate , the important thing is that whatever the reason , the free market has found gold and silver to be the most efficient moneys .
In a single paragraph , Dr. Rothbard demonstrated money emerges , on the free market , from commodities ; and , therefore , would emerge with or without the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Rothbard describes the gradual process a government implements to take control of a monetary system .
Once gold and silver are eliminated from the monetary system , per Rothbard , “ …the way is clear for full-scale , government-run inflation.
” ( pg .
82 ) .
Government , ultimately , becomes a counterfeiter .
However , this doesn ’ t mean a government stops paying attention to gold and silver .
Governments and their agents , in fact , rig the prices of gold and silver .
Along these lines , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rigging gold ’ s price : Why Gold ?
Why Now ?
: Th ... Tucker , E.B .
Best Price : $ 29.00 Buy New $ 17.99 Ever since the Great Depression , controlling the dollar price of gold and deciding who gets to hold gold was official policy .
This advanced the Federal Reserve ’ s original goal of demonetizing precious metals , which was fully achieved in August 1971 .
Today , even though the official position of all central banks is that gold is not money , central bankers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pretending the dollar is stronger than it really is .
In other words , managing the price of gold ( to the extent this can be accomplished ) , is all about managing the perception of the dollar ’ s soundness .
So , how does silver come into the picture ?
This is where The Big Silver Short shines .
To manage the price of gold entails rigging the price of silver as well .
Chapter 4 , of Chris Marcus ’ book , is an interview of Bill Murphy—who is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Committee .
Mr. Murphy perfectly articulates the rationale for manipulating silver ’ s price ( pg .
56 ) : …gold is what everyone pays attention to in regards to interest rates and the dollar .
But because silver is aligned with gold as a precious metal , they realized they would need to rig silver along with gold because they didn ’ t want a big dichotomy between the two .
If gold went one way and silver went the other , people would be able to see they were rigging the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in rigging the silver market too .
It ’ s a smaller and easier to control market , and that ’ s certainly what they have done .
I came to this same conclusion several years ago .
Nevertheless , it is validating to be in the same company with Bill Murphy .
The Big Silver Short is a compilation of 15 interviews of the world ’ s top silver experts .
Each interview comprises a chapter of the book .
Before reading this book , I was familiar with the writings a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the book , I had no doubt Chris Marcus selected wisely as to whom he interviewed .
Chris opens each chapter by providing background information regarding each expert and then proceeds with thoughtful questions and commentary to draw out thought-provoking information from each interviewee .
Here ’ s the list of interviews by chapter and expert : The Last Gold Rushu202 ... Haynes , Bill Buy New $ 28.00 Chapter 16 , the final chapter , is written by Chris Marcus .
He ties together important information conveyed by these experts ; and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uncovered in the interviews .
Consequently , I am not surprised by his choice to emphasize the importance of the late Bart Chilton ’ s interview .
It truly is the “ smoking-gun ” interview and unquestionably exposes J.P. Morgan to be at the heart of silver ’ s manipulation .
Bart Chilton , at the time of the Global Financial Crisis ( GFC ) , was a commissioner of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) .
Therefore , he had a front-row seat to watch silver get hammered from $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s price behavior was the exact opposite of what one would expect during a financial crisis .
So here is part of Chris Marcus ’ summary of what Bart Chilton stated in his interview ( pg .
310 ) : First is Bart ’ s confirmation that when Bear Stearns failed in March of 2008 , they did indeed have a large silver short position .
He also confirms that position was transferred to J.P. Morgan during the takeover deal .
And he goes on to mention that after the takeover , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it violated the position limit .
To which the CFTC responded by giving them a temporary waiver period , during which they were supposed to reduce the position .
But instead , they made it even larger !
Hence , in the teeth of the GFC , J.P. Morgan defied the CFTC and increased its silver short position at the exact time silver was plunging from $ 21 to $ 9—cause and effect , to be sure .
This was criminal behavior which must have made the bankster community proud .
Chilton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the CFTC ’ s other four commissioners to do anything about this behavior .
Here ’ s another gem from the concluding chapter .
Understanding the COMEX serves as the primary clearinghouse for gold and silver futures contracts , the COMEX is the epicenter of the silver suppression scheme .
Chris Marcus pens the following to demonstrate how extreme silver ’ s manipulation has become ( pg .
323 ) : Yet we ’ re talking about a market where the price has been repeatedly suppressed by large amounts of short paper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now agree that for every ounce of physical silver , there ’ s somewhere north of 500 paper claims to it .
With silver guru David Morgan mentioning that when derivatives are added in , it ’ s likely even larger than that .
One of the most interesting indicators , of silver manipulation , pertains to the gold to silver ratio .
Simply put , this ratio indicates how many ounces of silver it would take to purchase one ounce of gold .
Today , for example , it would take 72 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of gold ; meaning the gold to silver ratio is 72 to 1 .
Regarding this ratio , here ’ s what David Morgan stated in his interview ( pg .
22 ) : What ’ s the proper ratio ?
I don ’ t know , but Franklin Sanders did a great study on it in the book Silver Bonanza .
In that book he points out that if you look at the gold to silver ratio over centuries , if every century was one foot in length on a scroll you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feet long , and it would be the last foot where the gold to silver ratio got above 16 to 1 .
The USGS ( United States Geological Survey ) says the natural ratio is 9 to 1 , and we ’ ll take them at their word .
But no one knows the exact number .
The Great Devaluation : ... Baratta , Adam Buy New $ 25.00 Although correlation does not mean causation , I don ’ t believe it ’ s merely a coincidence that the Federal Reserve was launched @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the gold/silver ratio has severely vaulted away from the ratio which naturally emerged over the 34 centuries prior to the Fed ’ s founding .
In my mind , this is another clear indicator silver is officially manipulated .
For those interested in silver as an asset class , let ’ s bring the definition of “ mean reversion ” into the picture .
Per Investopedia : “ Mean reversion is a theory used in finance that suggests that asset prices and historical returns will revert to the long-run mean or average level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ silver ’ s 35-century dataset , in relationship to gold , a powerful argument can be made that silver ’ s price should be 4.5 times higher today .
A notable interview was that of Keith Neumeyer .
He is the president , CEO , and founder of First Majestic Silver Corp. Of the fifteen interviewees , Mr. Neumeyer is the only silver miner in the group .
First Majestic Silver is one of the world ’ s leading silver miners and does sell fabricated silver directly to the public .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s interviews and have tremendous respect for him ; as he is one of the few silver and gold mining company executives willing to assert gold and silver markets are rigged .
Per his March 26 , 2019 interview ( pgs .
127-128 ) : I worked for banks in my early career in the ‘ 80s , and that ’ s my background .
So I not only have years of experience on the silver side , I also have experience on the banking side .
So I understand how the financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ metal prices are being depressed .
I know the reasons why , and it all makes perfect sense .
Keith Neumeyer then goes on to discuss the gold/silver ratio ( pg .
128 ) : Show me a mining company that ’ s actually increasing their silver production .
I don ’ t know one out there that ’ s doing it .
It ’ s just a function of silver being a lot more rare than people think it is .
A shocking stat to me is that while the current gold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 , we ’ re only mining it at about 8 to 1 .
How does that continue ?
I just don ’ t know .
In other interviews , Mr. Neumeyer has made the case for silver to go well above $ 100 per ounce .
Having read the works of the great Austrian economist , Murray Rothbard , I came to understand government , the Federal Reserve , and our banks intertwine to form a vast criminal enterprise .
I firmly believe Rothbard would have enjoyed The Big Silver Short .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to like about reading fifteen engaging interviews covering a monetary metal that is being manipulated ; with the criminal organization , J.P. Morgan , in the middle of this scheme .
I ’ ve only scratched the surface of what is conveyed in this book ; as it covers much more than silver ’ s manipulation .
One thing is certain , just as the London Gold Pool failed , so will the present-day manipulations of gold and silver .
The Federal Reserve ’ s crazed policies will see to this failure .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ message from Chris Marcus ’ book , a reversion to the mean , of the gold/silver ratio , assures spectacular results .
The Best of Eric Englund

Idaho’s Silver Valley is a short drive from my hometown of Spokane, WA. Perhaps the regional importance of silver mining helps explain my affinity for silver. As a boy, growing up in the 1960s, I enjoyed finding silver dimes, quarters, and half-dollars when receiving change at local stores; and I kept them knowing they were valuable. Shortly after college, when a job transfer moved me to Boise, ID, in 1985, I found myself purchasing 100-ounce silver bars directly from Sunshine Mining Company. To me, it felt right to exchange fiat currency for silver; and, to this day, I view this as saving. Through the years, nonetheless, something was gnawing at me regarding the silver market. Silver’s price action seemed utterly strange; as if there was an invisible, yet officially-sanctioned, hand manipulating it to keep it suppressed. To be sure, there have been highly credible voices claiming manipulation; and they weren’t just voices in my head imploring me to wear a tinfoil hat appropriate for inmates in a loony bin. Many of these voices, recently, have been brought together in Chris Marcus’ terrific new book The Big Silver Short.
During the period of 1990-1993, silver often languished at prices below $4 per ounce. It was great, nonetheless, to stack bars at bargain prices. As for mainstream financial analysts, silver was a laughing stock during these years. A common assertion was that silver, once a monetary metal, was now merely an industrial metal. Hence, by their logic, there would be no difference between stacking ingots of aluminum or stacking bars of silver. I didn’t agree with the mainstream’s bad-mouthing of silver and I continued to view silver as both a commodity and a store of wealth. The Big Silver Short: ... Marcus, Chris Buy New $20.65 (as of 04:57 UTC - Details)
Before going into details about The Big Silver Short, it is important to acknowledge public schools indoctrinate students with nonsense that money must be supplied and regulated by government. From grade school to grad school, this was pounded into my head. However, as alluded to above, my instincts said otherwise. Following such instincts, I came to the conclusion mainstream economics is a dead end and that answers, about the nature of money, had to be found elsewhere. Then, lo and behold, a friend introduced me to Austrian economics in 1995.
Upon my introduction, to Austrian economics, one of the first books I read was Murray Rothbard’s What Has Government Done to Our Money? Regarding the emergence of money, here’s what I found on pages 18-19, of this wonderful book:
Historically, many different goods have been used as media: tobacco in colonial Virginia, sugar in the West Indies, salt in Abyssinia, cattle in ancient Greece, nails in Scotland, copper in ancient Egypt, and grain, beads, tea, cowrie shells, and fish hooks. Through the centuries, two commodities, gold and silver, have emerged as money in the free competition of the market, and have displaced the other commodities. Both are uniquely marketable, are in great demand as ornaments, and excel in the other necessary qualities. In recent times, silver, being relatively more abundant than gold, has been found more useful for smaller exchanges, while gold is more useful for larger transactions. At any rate, the important thing is that whatever the reason, the free market has found gold and silver to be the most efficient moneys.
In a single paragraph, Dr. Rothbard demonstrated money emerges, on the free market, from commodities; and, therefore, would emerge with or without the existence of government.
In this book, Rothbard describes the gradual process a government implements to take control of a monetary system. Once gold and silver are eliminated from the monetary system, per Rothbard, “…the way is clear for full-scale, government-run inflation.” (pg. 82). Government, ultimately, becomes a counterfeiter. However, this doesn’t mean a government stops paying attention to gold and silver. Governments and their agents, in fact, rig the prices of gold and silver.
Along these lines, Dr. Ron Paul stated the following about rigging gold’s price: Why Gold? Why Now?: Th... Tucker, E.B. Best Price: $29.00 Buy New $17.99 (as of 04:57 UTC - Details)
Ever since the Great Depression, controlling the dollar price of gold and deciding who gets to hold gold was official policy. This advanced the Federal Reserve’s original goal of demonetizing precious metals, which was fully achieved in August 1971. Today, even though the official position of all central banks is that gold is not money, central bankers constantly rig the dollar price of gold, pretending the dollar is stronger than it really is.
In other words, managing the price of gold (to the extent this can be accomplished), is all about managing the perception of the dollar’s soundness.
So, how does silver come into the picture? This is where The Big Silver Short shines. To manage the price of gold entails rigging the price of silver as well. Chapter 4, of Chris Marcus’ book, is an interview of Bill Murphy—who is the co-founder of The Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee. Mr. Murphy perfectly articulates the rationale for manipulating silver’s price (pg. 56):
…gold is what everyone pays attention to in regards to interest rates and the dollar. But because silver is aligned with gold as a precious metal, they realized they would need to rig silver along with gold because they didn’t want a big dichotomy between the two. If gold went one way and silver went the other, people would be able to see they were rigging the gold market.
So they got involved in rigging the silver market too. It’s a smaller and easier to control market, and that’s certainly what they have done.
I came to this same conclusion several years ago. Nevertheless, it is validating to be in the same company with Bill Murphy.
The Big Silver Short is a compilation of 15 interviews of the world’s top silver experts. Each interview comprises a chapter of the book. Before reading this book, I was familiar with the writings a few of these experts. Upon finishing the book, I had no doubt Chris Marcus selected wisely as to whom he interviewed. Chris opens each chapter by providing background information regarding each expert and then proceeds with thoughtful questions and commentary to draw out thought-provoking information from each interviewee. Here’s the list of interviews by chapter and expert:
Chapter 1 – Dave Kranzler
Chapter 2 – David Morgan
Chapter 3 – Craig Hemke
Chapter 4 – Bill Murphy
Chapter 5 – Bix Weir
Chapter 6 – Bart Chilton
Chapter 7 – Keith Neumeyer
Chapter 8 – Ned Naylor-Leyland
Chapter 9 – Chris Powell
Chapter 10 – Andy Schectman
Chapter 11 – Jeff Clark
Chapter 12 – Ted Butler
Chapter 13 – Maurice Jackson
Chapter 14 – Andrew Maguire
Chapter 15 – Rick Rule
The Last Gold Rushu202... Haynes, Bill Buy New $28.00 (as of 04:04 UTC - Details) Chapter 16, the final chapter, is written by Chris Marcus. He ties together important information conveyed by these experts; and revisits some of the more stunning revelations uncovered in the interviews. Consequently, I am not surprised by his choice to emphasize the importance of the late Bart Chilton’s interview. It truly is the “smoking-gun” interview and unquestionably exposes J.P. Morgan to be at the heart of silver’s manipulation.
Bart Chilton, at the time of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), was a commissioner of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Therefore, he had a front-row seat to watch silver get hammered from $21 down to $9. Silver’s price behavior was the exact opposite of what one would expect during a financial crisis. So here is part of Chris Marcus’ summary of what Bart Chilton stated in his interview (pg. 310):
First is Bart’s confirmation that when Bear Stearns failed in March of 2008, they did indeed have a large silver short position.
He also confirms that position was transferred to J.P. Morgan during the takeover deal.
And he goes on to mention that after the takeover, the combined position was so large, that it violated the position limit.
To which the CFTC responded by giving them a temporary waiver period, during which they were supposed to reduce the position.
But instead, they made it even larger!
Hence, in the teeth of the GFC, J.P. Morgan defied the CFTC and increased its silver short position at the exact time silver was plunging from $21 to $9—cause and effect, to be sure. This was criminal behavior which must have made the bankster community proud. Chilton, unfortunately, did not have support from the CFTC’s other four commissioners to do anything about this behavior.
Here’s another gem from the concluding chapter. Understanding the COMEX serves as the primary clearinghouse for gold and silver futures contracts, the COMEX is the epicenter of the silver suppression scheme. Chris Marcus pens the following to demonstrate how extreme silver’s manipulation has become (pg. 323):
Yet we’re talking about a market where the price has been repeatedly suppressed by large amounts of short paper. To the extent that many experts now agree that for every ounce of physical silver, there’s somewhere north of 500 paper claims to it. With silver guru David Morgan mentioning that when derivatives are added in, it’s likely even larger than that.
One of the most interesting indicators, of silver manipulation, pertains to the gold to silver ratio. Simply put, this ratio indicates how many ounces of silver it would take to purchase one ounce of gold. Today, for example, it would take 72 ounces of silver to purchase one ounce of gold; meaning the gold to silver ratio is 72 to 1. Regarding this ratio, here’s what David Morgan stated in his interview (pg. 22):
What’s the proper ratio? I don’t know, but Franklin Sanders did a great study on it in the book Silver Bonanza. In that book he points out that if you look at the gold to silver ratio over centuries, if every century was one foot in length on a scroll you rolled out, it would be 35 feet long, and it would be the last foot where the gold to silver ratio got above 16 to 1. The USGS (United States Geological Survey) says the natural ratio is 9 to 1, and we’ll take them at their word. But no one knows the exact number.
The Great Devaluation:... Baratta, Adam Buy New $25.00 (as of 05:09 UTC - Details) Although correlation does not mean causation, I don’t believe it’s merely a coincidence that the Federal Reserve was launched a little over a century ago and the gold/silver ratio has severely vaulted away from the ratio which naturally emerged over the 34 centuries prior to the Fed’s founding. In my mind, this is another clear indicator silver is officially manipulated.
For those interested in silver as an asset class, let’s bring the definition of “mean reversion” into the picture. Per Investopedia: “Mean reversion is a theory used in finance that suggests that asset prices and historical returns will revert to the long-run mean or average level of the entire dataset.” Factoring in silver’s 35-century dataset, in relationship to gold, a powerful argument can be made that silver’s price should be 4.5 times higher today.
A notable interview was that of Keith Neumeyer. He is the president, CEO, and founder of First Majestic Silver Corp. Of the fifteen interviewees, Mr. Neumeyer is the only silver miner in the group. First Majestic Silver is one of the world’s leading silver miners and does sell fabricated silver directly to the public. I’ve watched several of Keith Neumeyer’s interviews and have tremendous respect for him; as he is one of the few silver and gold mining company executives willing to assert gold and silver markets are rigged. Per his March 26, 2019 interview (pgs. 127-128):
I worked for banks in my early career in the ‘80s, and that’s my background. So I not only have years of experience on the silver side, I also have experience on the banking side. So I understand how the financial markets work, and I know that metal prices are being depressed. I know the reasons why, and it all makes perfect sense.
Keith Neumeyer then goes on to discuss the gold/silver ratio (pg. 128):
Show me a mining company that’s actually increasing their silver production. I don’t know one out there that’s doing it. It’s just a function of silver being a lot more rare than people think it is. A shocking stat to me is that while the current gold to silver ratio is about 85 to 1, we’re only mining it at about 8 to 1. How does that continue? I just don’t know.
In other interviews, Mr. Neumeyer has made the case for silver to go well above $100 per ounce.
Having read the works of the great Austrian economist, Murray Rothbard, I came to understand government, the Federal Reserve, and our banks intertwine to form a vast criminal enterprise. I firmly believe Rothbard would have enjoyed The Big Silver Short. After all, what’s not to like about reading fifteen engaging interviews covering a monetary metal that is being manipulated; with the criminal organization, J.P. Morgan, in the middle of this scheme. I’ve only scratched the surface of what is conveyed in this book; as it covers much more than silver’s manipulation. One thing is certain, just as the London Gold Pool failed, so will the present-day manipulations of gold and silver. The Federal Reserve’s crazed policies will see to this failure. And for those who embrace a key message from Chris Marcus’ book, a reversion to the mean, of the gold/silver ratio, assures spectacular results.
The Best of Eric Englund


Getting Liberalism Wrong

Yoram Hazony , author of The Virtue of Nationalism and one leader of a new “ national conservatism ” project , recently wrote an important and compelling article for Quillette titled “ The Challenge of Marxism.
” Hazony says out loud what few Western intellectuals will admit , namely that liberalism is not holding and has not triumphed in 2020 America and Europe .
We have not reached the end of history .
Our criticism lies not with Hazony ’ s thesis , but with his particular conception of what liberalism is , what it has become , and what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ correctly , the expressly Marxist takeover of once liberal institutions , especially “ mainstream media , universities , tech companies , philanthropies , and government bureaucracies.
” Marx , it turns out , has not been contained to the faculty lounge .
Instead an identity-focused variant of Marxism , with new class jargon and new victims , finds support in newsrooms , corporate boardrooms , advertising agencies , arts , and every reach of politics .
The rapidity of this illiberal shift worries him , and ought to worry all of us , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctrines of freedom , justice , and legal equality with rigid new forms of oppressor-oppressed class narratives .
The Virtue of Nationalism Yoram Hazony Best Price : $ 16.60 Buy New $ 16.99 Worse still , the Marxist campaign by definition destroys what came before it .
This includes traditions , religion , and an intellectual landscape of open inquiry from which conservatives like Hazony urge us to draw commonality .
Once liberalism succumbs to Marxism , and not incrementally , the very way we organize society is cast into chaos : But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aim is to destroy the intellectual and cultural traditions that are holding liberalism in place , their liberal opponents for the most part refuse to engage in the kind of conservatism that would be needed to defend their traditions and strengthen them .
Indeed , liberals frequently disparage tradition , telling their children and students that all they need is to reason freely and “ draw your own conclusions.
” The result is a radical imbalance between Marxists , who consciously work to bring about a conceptual revolution , and liberals whose insistence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provides little or no defense—and indeed , opens the door for precisely the kinds of arguments and tactics that Marxists use against them .
This imbalance means that the dance moves only in one direction , and that liberal ideas tend to collapse before Marxist criticism in a matter of decades .
Certainly Hazony is correct in his analysis of Marxism ’ s swift resurgence in America and the West , and rightfully concerned about it .
But there is a nagging sense that Hazony does not quite get the antidote to Marxist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of liberalism has failed in the West and appears to be in full retreat .
That form , however , is mostly just a vague lump of beliefs today ’ s liberals hold , or at least held twenty minutes ago .
It is not the rigorous and definable conception Ludwig von Mises provided one hundred years ago .
And I fear Hazony uses liberalism as a general catchall term for what today ’ s liberals claim to believe , rather than a coherent doctrine .
This concern surfaced in my 2018 interview @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he had superficially misread Mises as some avatar of hyperrational homo economicus .
In fact , Mises took pains throughout his work to consider culture , language , nationhood , religion , and intermediary institutions standing between individuals and uncaring markets .
To Hazony ’ s great credit , he agreed to read more and reconsider Mises .
The Quillette article , though , evinces Hazony ’ s ongoing perspective of what we might call modal liberals .
Absent moral grounding in religion , eschewing tradition and history , and hostile to individual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intellectual mooring against the mob .
When Marxists come for them , it is far easier and professionally far wiser simply to stay quiet and hope for the best .
Return of the Strong G ... R. R. Reno Best Price : $ 15.95 Buy New $ 19.25 This vague kind of ungrounded liberalism explains Hazony ’ s persistent tendency to take political and ideological pronouncements at face value .
Thus self-appointed liberals , from Noam Chomsky to Hillary Clinton to Mises and Hayek , are all cut from the same cloth .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they are .
But there is a big difference between Hillary Clinton and Ludwig von Mises which can not be dismissed merely by broadly terming both liberals or even “ neoliberals.
” This kind of imprecision does Hazony no favors .
Yet this Hazonyite caricature of liberalism is hardly made up out of whole cloth .
It arose in the second half of the twentieth century , and persists in the twenty-first , among the self-proclaimed classical liberals populating many nonprofits , NGOs , media outlets , and Beltway think tanks .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Institute and the Brookings Institution , of Professor Deirdre McCloskey and Professor Nadine Strossen , of David Brooks at the New York Times and David French at National Review .
These quasi liberals , like left progressives , share a profound sense that history has an arc : everything will get better all the time , if only recalcitrant Americans stop resisting the program .
It requires relentless political universalism , one set of rules and one kind of government for everyone , everywhere .
In this view , liberalism is a way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worldview adopted by good people .
Liberalism becomes almost undefinable by its breadth : an interconnected passel of open-minded and tolerant attitudes across a swath of “ social ” issues .
Cosmopolitanism , reason , tolerance , feminism , antiracism , and a healthy degree of support for egalitarian democracy are at the fore ; economics is not the focus .
Yes , free markets and property rights play a supporting role , but modal liberalism is more concerned with human self-actualization made possible only with the correct kinds of left-cultural attitudes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ off materially , and most of all they yield the kinds of societies and people liberals like .
The questions for this brand of liberalism write themselves .
Do its adherents really think the twentieth century represents a liberal triumph in the West ?
Has mass democratic voting produced liberal societies ?
Are Brexit and the Trump presidency illegitimate per se , or merely because liberals didn ’ t like the outcomes ?
Looking at the last century , should we count two bloody world wars , central banking and fiat currencies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ superstates , vast social insurance and welfare programs , and diminutions of property rights unimaginable to our grandparents as liberal programs ?
What exactly is liberal , and what is not ?
The aforementioned Mises explained this one hundred years ago .
His conception of liberalism , particularly found in his interwar books Nation , State , and Economy ( 1919 ) and Liberalism ( 1927 ) , show Mises grounding the organization of society in property and market cooperation : Why Liberalism Failed ... Deneen , Patrick J .
Best Price : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we condense Misesean liberalism down to its definable essence : property , freedom , and peace .
There is nothing mushy or fuzzy here .
For those willing to read on , Mises provides definitions .
• Without property we are utterly vulnerable and without agency , standing naked on a patch of earth .
The first calorie , the first drop of water , the first stitch of clothing all represent property .
What we create or produce from nature represents our will and actions made manifest in physical ( or digital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ideals of personal liberties or individual rights , sets the stage for all human activity .
• Without freedom , by which Mises meant independence from the arbitrary state power , we lose mastery over our lives and labors .
For Mises , freedom is not some inchoate aspiration or muddled set of conditions to “ live your best life.
” It is not liberation from worldly wants , from unhappiness , or from social opprobrium .
It is the ability to live and direct one ’ s life largely free of state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less .
Misesean liberalism recognizes involuntary servitude as a tremendous evil , but it also necessarily recognizes partial servitude to a rapacious government as contrary to our nature .
• Without peace , man loses his ability to enjoy property or exercise freedom .
War symbolizes the refusal of men to deal with one another cooperatively and the descent into an animalistic state of nature .
“ War , carnage , destruction , and devastation we have in common with the predatory beasts of the jungle ; constructive labor is our distinctively human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
This Misesean program , supplemented with his endorsement of aggressive self-determination and national secession to deal with inevitable political disputes , presents a very different and far more precise form of liberalism .
The Age of Entitlement ... Caldwell , Christopher Best Price : $ 20.10 Buy New $ 17.39 Would Hillary Clinton or Paul Krugman , both Hazonyite “ liberals , ” hold property as sacrosanct and argue against zoning or redistributive taxes ?
Would Kamala Harris or Rachel Maddow argue that freedom ought to include the ability to enact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden , supporter of Black Lives Matter , condemn the burning of auto dealerships in Kenosha as dangerous preludes to that most illiberal possibility , namely outright civil war ?
Dr. Hazony ’ s overly broad conception of liberalism as simply the worldview of liberals may render it meaningless .
I am sure he would agree that we don ’ t fight Marxism with platitudes or displays of tolerance ; we fight it with a robust and better set of clearly defined principles : property , self-determination , markets , and peace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the dying political class—provides the polarity opposite Marx .
Mises ’ s “ mere ” economics is in fact the understanding of human cooperation and choice in the face of scarcity , and it gives us the blueprint for organizing a wealthy and just society .
To the extent conservatives like Hazony can agree with this blueprint , Misesean liberalism is the robust counter to Marxist authoritarianism .
But Hazony must give up a significant degree of state if he hopes to preserve any degree of nation .
Note : The views @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Mises Institute .
The Red Trojan Horse : ... Elder , Alasdair Best Price : $ 14.85 Buy New $ 14.50 The Best of Jeff Deist

Yoram Hazony, author of The Virtue of Nationalism and one leader of a new “national conservatism” project, recently wrote an important and compelling article for Quillette titled “The Challenge of Marxism.” Hazony says out loud what few Western intellectuals will admit, namely that liberalism is not holding and has not triumphed in 2020 America and Europe. We have not reached the end of history.
Our criticism lies not with Hazony’s thesis, but with his particular conception of what liberalism is, what it has become, and what it should be.
Hazony laments, correctly, the expressly Marxist takeover of once liberal institutions, especially “mainstream media, universities, tech companies, philanthropies, and government bureaucracies.” Marx, it turns out, has not been contained to the faculty lounge. Instead an identity-focused variant of Marxism, with new class jargon and new victims, finds support in newsrooms, corporate boardrooms, advertising agencies, arts, and every reach of politics. The rapidity of this illiberal shift worries him, and ought to worry all of us, as it threatens to replace favored Enlightenment doctrines of freedom, justice, and legal equality with rigid new forms of oppressor-oppressed class narratives.
The Virtue of Nationalism Yoram Hazony Best Price: $16.60 Buy New $16.99 (as of 07:50 UTC - Details) Worse still, the Marxist campaign by definition destroys what came before it. This includes traditions, religion, and an intellectual landscape of open inquiry from which conservatives like Hazony urge us to draw commonality. Once liberalism succumbs to Marxism, and not incrementally, the very way we organize society is cast into chaos:
But while Marxists know very well that their aim is to destroy the intellectual and cultural traditions that are holding liberalism in place, their liberal opponents for the most part refuse to engage in the kind of conservatism that would be needed to defend their traditions and strengthen them. Indeed, liberals frequently disparage tradition, telling their children and students that all they need is to reason freely and “draw your own conclusions.” The result is a radical imbalance between Marxists, who consciously work to bring about a conceptual revolution, and liberals whose insistence on “freedom from inherited tradition” provides little or no defense—and indeed, opens the door for precisely the kinds of arguments and tactics that Marxists use against them. This imbalance means that the dance moves only in one direction, and that liberal ideas tend to collapse before Marxist criticism in a matter of decades.
Certainly Hazony is correct in his analysis of Marxism’s swift resurgence in America and the West, and rightfully concerned about it. But there is a nagging sense that Hazony does not quite get the antidote to Marxist revolution—liberalism—correct. Yes, an ersatz form of liberalism has failed in the West and appears to be in full retreat. That form, however, is mostly just a vague lump of beliefs today’s liberals hold, or at least held twenty minutes ago. It is not the rigorous and definable conception Ludwig von Mises provided one hundred years ago. And I fear Hazony uses liberalism as a general catchall term for what today’s liberals claim to believe, rather than a coherent doctrine.
This concern surfaced in my 2018 interview with Hazony, where I gently suggested he had superficially misread Mises as some avatar of hyperrational homo economicus. In fact, Mises took pains throughout his work to consider culture, language, nationhood, religion, and intermediary institutions standing between individuals and uncaring markets. To Hazony’s great credit, he agreed to read more and reconsider Mises.
The Quillette article, though, evinces Hazony’s ongoing perspective of what we might call modal liberals. Absent moral grounding in religion, eschewing tradition and history, and hostile to individual nation-states, Hazony’s liberals lack intellectual mooring against the mob. When Marxists come for them, it is far easier and professionally far wiser simply to stay quiet and hope for the best. Return of the Strong G... R. R. Reno Best Price: $15.95 Buy New $19.25 (as of 09:53 UTC - Details)
This vague kind of ungrounded liberalism explains Hazony’s persistent tendency to take political and ideological pronouncements at face value. Thus self-appointed liberals, from Noam Chomsky to Hillary Clinton to Mises and Hayek, are all cut from the same cloth. If they say they’re liberal, they are. But there is a big difference between Hillary Clinton and Ludwig von Mises which cannot be dismissed merely by broadly terming both liberals or even “neoliberals.” This kind of imprecision does Hazony no favors.
Yet this Hazonyite caricature of liberalism is hardly made up out of whole cloth. It arose in the second half of the twentieth century, and persists in the twenty-first, among the self-proclaimed classical liberals populating many nonprofits, NGOs, media outlets, and Beltway think tanks. It is the liberalism of the Cato Institute and the Brookings Institution, of Professor Deirdre McCloskey and Professor Nadine Strossen, of David Brooks at the New York Times and David French at National Review. These quasi liberals, like left progressives, share a profound sense that history has an arc: everything will get better all the time, if only recalcitrant Americans stop resisting the program. It requires relentless political universalism, one set of rules and one kind of government for everyone, everywhere.
In this view, liberalism is a way of thinking, a kind of enlightened worldview adopted by good people. Liberalism becomes almost undefinable by its breadth: an interconnected passel of open-minded and tolerant attitudes across a swath of “social” issues. Cosmopolitanism, reason, tolerance, feminism, antiracism, and a healthy degree of support for egalitarian democracy are at the fore; economics is not the focus. Yes, free markets and property rights play a supporting role, but modal liberalism is more concerned with human self-actualization made possible only with the correct kinds of left-cultural attitudes. Markets work, they make people better off materially, and most of all they yield the kinds of societies and people liberals like.
The questions for this brand of liberalism write themselves. Do its adherents really think the twentieth century represents a liberal triumph in the West? Has mass democratic voting produced liberal societies? Are Brexit and the Trump presidency illegitimate per se, or merely because liberals didn’t like the outcomes? Looking at the last century, should we count two bloody world wars, central banking and fiat currencies, income taxes, the rise of managerial superstates, vast social insurance and welfare programs, and diminutions of property rights unimaginable to our grandparents as liberal programs? What exactly is liberal, and what is not?
The aforementioned Mises explained this one hundred years ago. His conception of liberalism, particularly found in his interwar books Nation, State, and Economy (1919) and Liberalism (1927), show Mises grounding the organization of society in property and market cooperation: Why Liberalism Failed ... Deneen, Patrick J. Best Price: $2.49 Buy New $2.99 (as of 05:06 UTC - Details)
The program of liberalism, therefore, if condensed into a single word, would have to read: property, that is, private ownership of the means of production (for in regard to commodities ready for consumption, private ownership is a matter of course and is not disputed even by the socialists and communists). All the other demands of liberalism result from this fundamental demand. Side by side with the word “property” in the program of liberalism one may quite appropriately place the words “freedom” and “peace.” (Liberalism, p. 19–20)
Here we condense Misesean liberalism down to its definable essence: property, freedom, and peace. There is nothing mushy or fuzzy here. For those willing to read on, Mises provides definitions.
Without property we are utterly vulnerable and without agency, standing naked on a patch of earth. The first calorie, the first drop of water, the first stitch of clothing all represent property. What we create or produce from nature represents our will and actions made manifest in physical (or digital) form. Property, not vague ideals of personal liberties or individual rights, sets the stage for all human activity.
Without freedom, by which Mises meant independence from the arbitrary state power, we lose mastery over our lives and labors. For Mises, freedom is not some inchoate aspiration or muddled set of conditions to “live your best life.” It is not liberation from worldly wants, from unhappiness, or from social opprobrium. It is the ability to live and direct one’s life largely free of state coercion, nothing more and certainly nothing less. Misesean liberalism recognizes involuntary servitude as a tremendous evil, but it also necessarily recognizes partial servitude to a rapacious government as contrary to our nature.
Without peace, man loses his ability to enjoy property or exercise freedom. War symbolizes the refusal of men to deal with one another cooperatively and the descent into an animalistic state of nature. “War, carnage, destruction, and devastation we have in common with the predatory beasts of the jungle; constructive labor is our distinctively human characteristic” (Liberalism, p. 24).
This Misesean program, supplemented with his endorsement of aggressive self-determination and national secession to deal with inevitable political disputes, presents a very different and far more precise form of liberalism.
The Age of Entitlement... Caldwell, Christopher Best Price: $20.10 Buy New $17.39 (as of 08:49 UTC - Details) Would Hillary Clinton or Paul Krugman, both Hazonyite “liberals,” hold property as sacrosanct and argue against zoning or redistributive taxes? Would Kamala Harris or Rachel Maddow argue that freedom ought to include the ability to enact localized abortion or gun laws? Would Joe Biden, supporter of Black Lives Matter, condemn the burning of auto dealerships in Kenosha as dangerous preludes to that most illiberal possibility, namely outright civil war?
Dr. Hazony’s overly broad conception of liberalism as simply the worldview of liberals may render it meaningless. I am sure he would agree that we don’t fight Marxism with platitudes or displays of tolerance; we fight it with a robust and better set of clearly defined principles: property, self-determination, markets, and peace. Mises—not vague platitudes about tolerance emanating from the dying political class—provides the polarity opposite Marx. Mises’s “mere” economics is in fact the understanding of human cooperation and choice in the face of scarcity, and it gives us the blueprint for organizing a wealthy and just society. To the extent conservatives like Hazony can agree with this blueprint, Misesean liberalism is the robust counter to Marxist authoritarianism. But Hazony must give up a significant degree of state if he hopes to preserve any degree of nation.
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
The Red Trojan Horse: ... Elder, Alasdair Best Price: $14.85 Buy New $14.50 (as of 03:45 UTC - Details)
The Best of Jeff Deist