lewrockwell--2020-05-19--USA Today Smears Mercola Over Vitamin C and D Information

The fact that there is an information war going on is quite evident at this point .
Mainstream media , supported by monopoly tech platforms like Google , YouTube , Facebook and Twitter , are going to great lengths to control the narrative of what you see and read about the COVID-19 pandemic .
Videos questioning the narrative — even when done by health professionals and scientists — are taken down faster than you can share them .
Social media accounts of well-respected health professionals are being suppressed and removed .
Twitter is even trialing a moderator tool that warns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ post “ harmful ” language , although it ’ s unclear what the company might deem harmful.1 “ Fact-checking ” is also in overdrive , with journalists who are clueless about health and choose to side with the authoritarians writing articles “ debunking ” clear and provable facts without any counterevidence whatsoever .
Elegant Defense , An : T ... Richtel , Matt Best Price : $ 15.29 Buy New $ 12.54 Case in point : May 2 , 2020 , USA Today published “ Fact Check : Vitamins C and D Are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Coronavirus , ” 2 an article aimed at debunking my April 7 , 2020 , article , “ Vitamins C and D Finally Adopted as Coronavirus Treatment , ” which has more than 816,000 views .
USA Today writes , in part:3 This is beyond a shoddy “ debunking ” attempt .
What does “ adopted in conventional treatment ” actually mean ?
The fact that vitamin C is being used in a conventional hospital setting to treat COVID-19 patients means it is in fact being adopted in conventional treatment .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being used as “ the standard of care ” everywhere , but the fact is , it has been adopted as part of COVID-19 treatment by New York state ’ s largest hospital system .
My article also clearly states Northwell hospital system is using vitamin C “ in conjunction with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin.
” I never stated or implied vitamin C is being used in isolation as the sole treatment , or that it could be ( it probably shouldn ’ t ) .
So , essentially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then slapped a “ fake news ” label on it after falsely asserting “ there is no known evidence to suggest [ vitamin C ] is effective.
” My article , meanwhile , detailed the scientific evidence — with scientific references — underpinning the suggestion to use vitamin C and vitamin D to boost your immune system , which in turn can help protect against COVID-19 , seeing how it protects against most other viral illnesses .
USA Today presents no such counterevidence .
Instead , it cites an opinion expressed by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years ago — and directs readers to information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization , which states “ the only way to minimize the chances of contracting the virus is to take preventive steps such as social distancing … frequent hand-washing and cleaning of often-used surfaces.
” Information Combat Is the New Warfare Why do USA Today , CDC and WHO want the public to believe that there ’ s absolutely nothing they can do to protect themselves against SARS-CoV-2 ?
Why do they want us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it comes to preventing and/or surviving COVID-19 ?
Could it be because they want you to feel helpless enough to want a vaccine ?
Rule 101 of debunking is that you have to present counterevidence .
There ’ s clear evidence showing vitamin C ’ s usefulness against infectious disease , including sepsis , which is a major cause of death from COVID-19 .
If you ’ re going to claim that there ’ s “ no known evidence to suggest vitamin C is effective , ” then that means you have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ useless against infections and sepsis .
So , why did USA Today not bother digging up those scientific references rather than quoting Quackwatch and directing readers to the CDC and WHO websites , where , again , no actual scientific evidence is cited ?
Could it be because their shoddy journalists are counting on people to not think critically ?
Unfortunately , we ’ re bound to see more and more of this kind of irrational censoring of valuable health information as mainstream media pushes the WHO/CDC/Bill Gates narrative that our only hope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinate and digitally track , trace and surveil the global population .
In other words , their answer to the COVID-19 pandemic is the rapid rollout of a global totalitarian regime under which you can be placed in house arrest at any moment and be banned from travel , work , education , leisure and social activities simply because you ’ ve been infected or not infected/have or do not have antibodies/have or have not been vaccinated .
This strategy stands to make drug and tech companies untold billions of dollars , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ player behind the media messages you see .
The drug industry spent roughly $ 6 billon on drug ads to consumers in 2016,4,5 and drug ads ( sometimes disguised as content through the use of something called advertorials ) make up a fair share of the advertising dollars that media corporations depend on for their survival .
In November 2019 , Gannett , the parent company of USA Today , merged with GateHouse Media , owned by New Media Investment Group.6,7,8 Together , they now form the largest media monopoly in the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their umbrella.9 The management of this vast news network is done by Fortress Investment Group , a private equity firm , which in turn is owned by Tokyo ’ s SoftBank.10 According to CNBC,11 SoftBank ’ s CEO , the Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son , also has “ a wide network of relationships ” in the tech industry and is said to be “ one of the technology industry ’ s most influential investors.
” In 2018 , Son funded EarthNow , a project involving 500 satellites equipped with machine learning technology to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Another funder of this project was Bill Gates.12 ( Incidentally , this project sounds like it could find a purpose in Gates ’ proposed surveillance plan , and not be relegated to catching illegal fishing and tracking animal migration . )
My point , though , is this : The majority of mainstream media in the U.S. are owned , funded ( through advertising ) — and therefore easily controlled — by powerful corporate entities and industries , some of which are overseas and may not even have American interests at heart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pharma and Big Tech run deep .
Is it any wonder then that so often , so many news outlets use the same exact talking points on health , drugs , pesticides , GMOs and 5G , just to name a few ?
How is it that they ’ re using the identical language , as if they ’ re all reading and copying a single script ?
Fortunately , many are starting to see through the bias .
The censorship has gotten so ridiculously blatant , it ’ s hard to miss @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are losing what little credibility they had left .
Their machinations have simply become too obvious .
Plagues , Pandemics and ... Quinlan , Heather E. Buy New $ 22.95 As of September 2019 , American ’ s trust in mass media had dipped to 41 % ; only 13 % trusted the media “ a great deal.
” 13 March 19 , 2020 , Publishers Daily reported14 the results from a February 2020 Axios/Ipsos poll15 showing only 51 % of American adults trust newspapers to provide them with accurate information about COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pandemic “ very closely.
” Only 47 % trust mainstream digital publishers to report accurate information about COVID-19 .
Still , 85 % trust the CDC and 77 % trust WHO , both of which have the same conflicts of interest as most mainstream media.16 In the EU , the average net trust in the media as a whole is in the negative — minus 9 % — when you include all forms , including radio , television , press , digital publishers and other online sources , including social media.17 Nutrition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Regardless of what the mainstream media want you to think , many are starting to realize the truth , which is that both vitamin C and D have an enormous amount of evidence showing they provide important immune function benefits , and that your immune function is your front-line defense against all illness , including COVID-19 .
As reported in the paper18 “ Optimal Nutritional Status for a Well-Functioning Immune System Is an Important Factor to Protect Against Viral Infections , ” published April 23 , 2020 : In related news , Finnish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that are regulated by vitamin D.19 In vitro tests show vitamin D targets genes that support immune function in response to acute infection , infection in general , and autoimmunity .
According to the authors , “ 15 genes were identified as major mediators of the action of vitamin D in innate and adaptive immunity.
” Irish researchers recently published an editorial20 highlighting the role of vitamin D deficiency in severe COVID-19 infections specifically .
According to the authors : The Beautiful Cure : Th ... Davis , Daniel M. Buy New $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in “ Vitamin D Level Is Directly Correlated to COVID-19 Outcome.
” Similarly , a May 6 , 2020 , report21 published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research ( its prepublication featured in the Daily Mail May 122 ) , found that countries with lower vitamin D levels have higher death rates from COVID-19 .
According to the authors:23 In the preprint version24 of this paper , the authors concluded : “ We believe that we can advise vitamin D supplementation to protect against SARS-CoV2 infection.
” In the final version,25 they toned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hypothesize that vitamin D may play a protective role for COVID-19.
” Gannett-owned USA Today is clearly , knowingly , publishing health news aimed at preventing people from effectively protecting themselves against severe COVID-19 infection .
So , what ’ s their excuse for not sticking to scientifically verifiable facts ?
The Best of Joseph Mercola

The fact that there is an information war going on is quite evident at this point. Mainstream media, supported by monopoly tech platforms like Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, are going to great lengths to control the narrative of what you see and read about the COVID-19 pandemic.
Videos questioning the narrative — even when done by health professionals and scientists — are taken down faster than you can share them. Social media accounts of well-respected health professionals are being suppressed and removed. Twitter is even trialing a moderator tool that warns users when they’re about to post “harmful” language, although it’s unclear what the company might deem harmful.1
Fact-Checking at Its Worst
“Fact-checking” is also in overdrive, with journalists who are clueless about health and choose to side with the authoritarians writing articles “debunking” clear and provable facts without any counterevidence whatsoever. Elegant Defense, An: T... Richtel, Matt Best Price: $15.29 Buy New $12.54 (as of 03:19 UTC - Details)
Case in point: May 2, 2020, USA Today published “Fact Check: Vitamins C and D Are Not Used in ‘Conventional Treatment’ of Coronavirus,”2 an article aimed at debunking my April 7, 2020, article, “Vitamins C and D Finally Adopted as Coronavirus Treatment,” which has more than 816,000 views. USA Today writes, in part:3
“Mercola’s claim about vitamins and the coronavirus cites a New York Post article from March 24 that describes the use of vitamin C by Northwell Health, a New York hospital system, to treat patients with coronavirus.
Northwell spokesperson Jason Molinet confirmed to USA TODAY that ‘vitamin C was one of many therapies employed at the discretion of physicians in our health system.’
Molinet declined to answer follow-up questions about how widespread the use of vitamin C was, what the results of the treatment were and what studies or data Northwell relied on when deciding whether to use vitamin C as part of COVID-19 treatment. He declined to make a doctor available to speak about the treatment, saying, ‘That’s the extent of our statement on this.’
Our Ruling: False.
Though vitamin C is used, at least in one New York hospital system, to help treat some patients on a case-by-case basis, there is no known evidence to suggest it is effective.
Occasional use of vitamins C or D in COVID-19 treatment at the discretion of a patient and doctor is not the same as saying they are being adopted ‘in the conventional treatment’ of the coronavirus, as Mercola’s article says.”
This is beyond a shoddy “debunking” attempt. What does “adopted in conventional treatment” actually mean? The fact that vitamin C is being used in a conventional hospital setting to treat COVID-19 patients means it is in fact being adopted in conventional treatment.
I never stated or implied vitamin C is being used as “the standard of care” everywhere, but the fact is, it has been adopted as part of COVID-19 treatment by New York state’s largest hospital system.
My article also clearly states Northwell hospital system is using vitamin C “in conjunction with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin.” I never stated or implied vitamin C is being used in isolation as the sole treatment, or that it could be (it probably shouldn’t).
So, essentially, USA Today confirmed my report, then slapped a “fake news” label on it after falsely asserting “there is no known evidence to suggest [vitamin C] is effective.”
My article, meanwhile, detailed the scientific evidence — with scientific references — underpinning the suggestion to use vitamin C and vitamin D to boost your immune system, which in turn can help protect against COVID-19, seeing how it protects against most other viral illnesses.
USA Today presents no such counterevidence. Instead, it cites an opinion expressed by the founder of QuackWatch.org in 2012 — eight years ago — and directs readers to information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization, which states “the only way to minimize the chances of contracting the virus is to take preventive steps such as social distancing … frequent hand-washing and cleaning of often-used surfaces.”
Information Combat Is the New Warfare
Why do USA Today, CDC and WHO want the public to believe that there’s absolutely nothing they can do to protect themselves against SARS-CoV-2? Why do they want us to think our immune system is irrelevant when it comes to preventing and/or surviving COVID-19? Could it be because they want you to feel helpless enough to want a vaccine?
Rule 101 of debunking is that you have to present counterevidence. There’s clear evidence showing vitamin C’s usefulness against infectious disease, including sepsis, which is a major cause of death from COVID-19. If you’re going to claim that there’s “no known evidence to suggest vitamin C is effective,” then that means you have to produce studies showing vitamin C is useless against infections and sepsis.
So, why did USA Today not bother digging up those scientific references rather than quoting Quackwatch and directing readers to the CDC and WHO websites, where, again, no actual scientific evidence is cited? Could it be because their shoddy journalists are counting on people to not think critically?
Unfortunately, we’re bound to see more and more of this kind of irrational censoring of valuable health information as mainstream media pushes the WHO/CDC/Bill Gates narrative that our only hope for a return to normalcy is to vaccinate and digitally track, trace and surveil the global population.
In other words, their answer to the COVID-19 pandemic is the rapid rollout of a global totalitarian regime under which you can be placed in house arrest at any moment and be banned from travel, work, education, leisure and social activities simply because you’ve been infected or not infected/have or do not have antibodies/have or have not been vaccinated.
This strategy stands to make drug and tech companies untold billions of dollars, and the drug industry is undoubtedly a key player behind the media messages you see. The drug industry spent roughly $6 billon on drug ads to consumers in 2016,4,5 and drug ads (sometimes disguised as content through the use of something called advertorials) make up a fair share of the advertising dollars that media corporations depend on for their survival.
USA Today Is Part of Media Monopoly
In November 2019, Gannett, the parent company of USA Today, merged with GateHouse Media, owned by New Media Investment Group.6,7,8 Together, they now form the largest media monopoly in the U.S., with more than 260 dailies under their umbrella.9
The management of this vast news network is done by Fortress Investment Group, a private equity firm, which in turn is owned by Tokyo’s SoftBank.10 According to CNBC,11 SoftBank’s CEO, the Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son, also has “a wide network of relationships” in the tech industry and is said to be “one of the technology industry’s most influential investors.”
In 2018, Son funded EarthNow, a project involving 500 satellites equipped with machine learning technology to surveil the entire planet with real-time video. Another funder of this project was Bill Gates.12 (Incidentally, this project sounds like it could find a purpose in Gates’ proposed surveillance plan, and not be relegated to catching illegal fishing and tracking animal migration.)
My point, though, is this: The majority of mainstream media in the U.S. are owned, funded (through advertising) — and therefore easily controlled — by powerful corporate entities and industries, some of which are overseas and may not even have American interests at heart.
Media’s ties to Big Pharma and Big Tech run deep. Is it any wonder then that so often, so many news outlets use the same exact talking points on health, drugs, pesticides, GMOs and 5G, just to name a few? How is it that they’re using the identical language, as if they’re all reading and copying a single script?
Trust in Mainstream Media Is Rapidly Eroding
Fortunately, many are starting to see through the bias. The censorship has gotten so ridiculously blatant, it’s hard to miss. As a result, mainstream media are losing what little credibility they had left. Their machinations have simply become too obvious. Plagues, Pandemics and... Quinlan, Heather E. Buy New $22.95 (as of 03:02 UTC - Details)
As of September 2019, American’s trust in mass media had dipped to 41%; only 13% trusted the media “a great deal.” 13
March 19, 2020, Publishers Daily reported14 the results from a February 2020 Axios/Ipsos poll15 showing only 51% of American adults trust newspapers to provide them with accurate information about COVID-19 — the same ratio saying they track the pandemic “very closely.”
Only 47% trust mainstream digital publishers to report accurate information about COVID-19. Still, 85% trust the CDC and 77% trust WHO, both of which have the same conflicts of interest as most mainstream media.16
In the EU, the average net trust in the media as a whole is in the negative — minus 9% — when you include all forms, including radio, television, press, digital publishers and other online sources, including social media.17
Nutrition Is Essential to Protect Against Viral Illnesses
Regardless of what the mainstream media want you to think, many are starting to realize the truth, which is that both vitamin C and D have an enormous amount of evidence showing they provide important immune function benefits, and that your immune function is your front-line defense against all illness, including COVID-19.
As reported in the paper18 “Optimal Nutritional Status for a Well-Functioning Immune System Is an Important Factor to Protect Against Viral Infections,” published April 23, 2020:
“The role nutrition plays in supporting the immune system is well-established. A wealth of mechanistic and clinical data show that vitamins, including vitamins A, B6, B12, C, D, E, and folate; trace elements, including zinc, iron, selenium, magnesium, and copper; and the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid play important and complementary roles in supporting the immune system.
Inadequate intake and status of these nutrients are widespread, leading to a decrease in resistance to infections and as a consequence an increase in disease burden. Against this background the following conclusions are made:
(1) supplementation with the above micronutrients and omega-3 fatty acids is a safe, effective, and low-cost strategy to help support optimal immune function
(2) supplementation above the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), but within recommended upper safety limits, for specific nutrients such as vitamins C and D is warranted; and
(3) public health officials are encouraged to include nutritional strategies in their recommendations to improve public health.”
In related news, Finnish researchers have identified specific immune health-related genes that are regulated by vitamin D.19 In vitro tests show vitamin D targets genes that support immune function in response to acute infection, infection in general, and autoimmunity. According to the authors, “15 genes were identified as major mediators of the action of vitamin D in innate and adaptive immunity.”
Low Vitamin D Levels Linked to Increased COVID-19 Mortality
Irish researchers recently published an editorial20 highlighting the role of vitamin D deficiency in severe COVID-19 infections specifically. According to the authors:
“… the evidence supporting a protective effect of vitamin D against severe COVID‐19 disease is very suggestive, a substantial proportion of the population in the Northern Hemisphere will currently be vitamin D deficient, and supplements, for example, 1,000 international units (25 micrograms) per day are very safe.
It is time for governments to strengthen recommendations for vitamin D intake and supplementation, particularly when under lock‐down.”
The Beautiful Cure: Th... Davis, Daniel M. Buy New $18.00 (as of 03:19 UTC - Details) You can learn more about this in “Vitamin D Level Is Directly Correlated to COVID-19 Outcome.” Similarly, a May 6, 2020, report21 published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (its prepublication featured in the Daily Mail May 122), found that countries with lower vitamin D levels have higher death rates from COVID-19. According to the authors:23
“The Seneca study showed a mean serum vitamin D level of 26 nmol/L in Spain, 28 nmol/L in Italy and 45 nmol/L in the Nordic countries, in older people. In Switzerland, mean vitamin D level is 23 nmol/L in nursing homes and in Italy 76% of women over 70 years of age have been found to have circulating levels below 30 nmol/L.
These are the countries with high number of cases of COVID-19 and the aging people is the group with the highest risk for morbidity and mortality with SARS-CoV2.”
In the preprint version24 of this paper, the authors concluded: “We believe that we can advise vitamin D supplementation to protect against SARS-CoV2 infection.” In the final version,25 they toned down the recommendation to: “We hypothesize that vitamin D may play a protective role for COVID-19.”
Gannett-owned USA Today is clearly, knowingly, publishing health news aimed at preventing people from effectively protecting themselves against severe COVID-19 infection. So, what’s their excuse for not sticking to scientifically verifiable facts?
Sources and References
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola


lewrockwell--2020-05-20--Americans, Go Back To Work Before You Lose Your Country and Your Lives

We all need to get back to work or there will be no normal American life to return to .
The current refrain is that by breaking the lockdown Americans may be responsible for their grandmother ’ s premature death by spreading the dreaded COVID-19 coronavirus in the community .
So says a highly visible virologist on television who serves the White House as spokesperson for the Centers for Disease Control , an agency even she says she can ’ t trust .
The truth is opposite .
And if Americans don ’ t go back to work immediately they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their own families and millions of other fellow Americans .
We aren ’ t just talking about anxiety , suicide , loneliness and low vitamin D levels from being confined indoors .
We are talking about food shortages and even starvation in some families as well as financial insolvency , ruination of credit , family conflict , divorce , desperation and loss of hope .
Don ’ t Be Alone I ... Wylder MD , Bex Buy New $ 8.99 Americans are like a herd of sheep backed against a cliff with no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ backed against a precipice by expert fearmongers pretending they are foxes in fox skins .
Sooner or later the sheep jump off the cliff thinking there is no other way out .
America is now facing that kind of horrid moment when its people do themselves in .
• The trash man must do his work or streets will fill with waste and public hygiene becomes a bigger issue than the coronavirus .
Rats will run wild splurging on the garbage that mounts .
The Plague might return if rats are given garbage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process meat or the animals must be slain and buried .
• The cows must be milked or the babies will go without infant formula .
Too many Americans are resigning from their jobs that make contact with the public because they think they are going to get the virus and die .
But you do death-defying things every day .
We depend on each other AMERICA GO BACK TO WORK !
Don ’ t listen to the so-called experts .
You are risking the lives of your loved ones and millions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We depend on each other .
We have already dismantled our safety net and hospitals and doctors ’ offices have closed for good .
Don ’ t help dismantle America .
Remember the nursery rhyme : all the kings ’ horses and all the kings ’ men couldn ’ t put Humpty Dumpty together again .
Think that you are going back to work so your family does not go without food and medicine .
High Risk : Stories of ... Karkowsky MD , Chavi Eve Best Price : $ 7.47 Buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very infectious , but not deadly .
If you don ’ t get infected and develop life-long antibodies you will be vulnerable to this disease .
You can wait for a vaccine , which is a minute-dose of the virus itself , but there is a very remote chance a vaccine will ever materialize .
Microbiologists have been working on a coronavirus vaccine for over 8 years now .
All of the coronavirus vaccines failed to be licensed .
Don ’ t make a guinea pig out of yourself If you elect to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a giant human experiment .
Regardless of whether the vaccine works or not , there will be a predicted 1 % risk of side effects ( 1 in 100 we learn from flu-shot studies ) that would be severe enough to cause hospitalization….. which means 3,280,000 Americans would need to be hospitalized out of 328 million population .
Those numbers would overwhelm hospitals that only have ~100,000 critical care ( intensive care unit ) beds .
Using data from an influenza vaccine study , hospitalization could result in 1 % death rate ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 in 200 ) possible risk of death , or 32,800 needless deaths in the U.S .
The vaccine may be perfectly safe , at least in healthy adults .
But once hospitalized , medication errors , antibiotic resistance , over-use of ventilators , medication interactions , may result in the demise of the patient .
The vaccine will be declared perfectly safe , but hospitalization itself is risky .
The Chronic Fatigue Sy ... Ortleb , Charles Best Price : $ 16.55 Buy New $ 17.95 Vaccination is problematic .
The vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus itself .
You expose yourself to a little bit of the virus in hopes you develop sufficient antibodies that will provide you with life-long immunity .
But about 40 % of people don ’ t develop sufficient antibodies .
If you are diabetic , are obese , take immune suppressant drugs , have dark skin and therefore low sunshine vitamin D blood levels , then any vaccine may not produce sufficient antibodies against the COVID-19 coronavirus and you stand a chance of developing the horrid symptoms of full-blown coronavirus lung infection .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vitamin D. In one study of COVID-19 infected patients , 74 % were vitamin D insufficient or deficient .
Another study shows 100 % of those patients hospitalized for COVID-19 coronavirus infection over the age of 75 were vitamin D deficient .
Don ’ t give any credence to news stories you read that there is no evidence that vitamin D is helpful for COVID-19 .
You hear these negative news stories because the news press is in league with the vaccine makers to make you plead for vaccination .
In one study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normal vitamin D levels were in critical condition versus 59 % of those with low vitamin D blood levels .
Health authorities in England have already issued a declaration for their population to start taking vitamin D supplements .
I The Vitamin D Revoluti ... Soram Khalsa Best Price : $ 1.25 Buy New $ 10.69 f you have been staying indoors for a couple months now you have been depriving yourself of sunshine vitamin D. Your liver is supposed to store 3 months of vitamin D to get humans through winter when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from sunshine .
We also wrap ourselves in warm clothing in winter that keep warmth in , but blocks skin exposure to solar radiation that is required to produce vitamin D. You need to be outdoors in midday sun with skin exposed to make natural vitamin D. Presume your vitamin D blood levels are low and supplement your diet with the newly recommended 8000 units of vitamin D daily .
Did you know there is a belt around the earth of countries that report almost no deaths from COVID-19 coronavirus ?
That belt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries receive more solar ultraviolet radiation because the atmosphere sun rays pass through is thinner .
You can mimic this protective effect by taking sunshine vitamin D in a bottle – vitamin D pills .
And you ask why public health authorities and the news media don ’ t tell you this .
Yes , it ’ s a shame .
More than 90 % of people who are infected with the COVID-19 coronavirus experience no symptoms or mild symptoms .
If you supplement your diet with zinc , vitamin D , vitamin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your odds of experiencing symptomless infection and life-long antibody protection .
A report published in EURO SURVEILLANCE indicates only a very strict , almost 100 % compliance with a lockdown and immediate isolation of those who exhibit symptoms would need to be achieved to effectively block its transmission and spread .
Just the matriculation of health care workers to mix with infected patients results in a third of the infections .
Just emergency personnel such as law enforcement and paramedics would eventually spread this virus .
Just visits to the grocery store violate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way to completely lockdown a modern society .
Only small households with 2 or at most 3 family members will be able to slow the transmission of the disease .
Germany ’ s BILD newspaper says “ lockdown was a huge mistake.
” Then your only option , without a vaccine , is to optimize your immune system to develop life-long antibody protection .
Organic Zinc Sulfate L ... Buy New $ 18.95 ( $ 4.74 / Fl Oz ) Another word of caution : synthetic vaccines today often don ’ t provide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see outbreaks of measles in school children these days .
Do we need to vaccinate ?
According to the most recent data , 93 % of the American population that has been infected with COVID-19 coronavirus has recovered .
By taking dietary supplements ( vitamins C , D , minerals zinc and selenium ) the remaining 7 % of individuals would prime their immune system and be expected to develop antibodies and life-long immunity .
If you remain in lockdown you just delay inevitable exposure to this virus .
Health authorities want people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can test it on you .
Don ’ t let them make a guinea pig out of you !
Will the virus die off once large populations develop antibodies against it ?
There is concern the COVID-19 coronavirus may return with a vengeance .
Once the virus is in circulation and many people fighting it off , developing antibodies without symptoms , the virus may mutate .
Individuals in the population who are being freshly exposed to the COVID-19 coronavirus may experience a mutation , a different viral strain that is more or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals to ensure they consume enough selenium , a trace mineral , that prevents viral mutations and has been demonstrated to improve the cure rate by 500 % to protect large populations from the COVID-19 coronavirus .
The choice is yours Americans .
Your country is rotting away without you .
GET BACK TO WORK !
P.S .
– Forward this report to your timid and fearful friends and family .
Yes , we are all in this together , but we also want out of this together .
Premium Liposomal Vita ... @ @ @ @ @ @ @ / Fl Oz ) Selenium 200mcg for Th ... Buy New $ 16.95 ( $ 0.19 / Count )

We all need to get back to work or there will be no normal American life to return to.
The current refrain is that by breaking the lockdown Americans may be responsible for their grandmother’s premature death by spreading the dreaded COVID-19 coronavirus in the community. So says a highly visible virologist on television who serves the White House as spokesperson for the Centers for Disease Control, an agency even she says she can’t trust.
The truth is opposite. And if Americans don’t go back to work immediately they may be responsible for the deaths of their own families and millions of other fellow Americans. We aren’t just talking about anxiety, suicide, loneliness and low vitamin D levels from being confined indoors. We are talking about food shortages and even starvation in some families as well as financial insolvency, ruination of credit, family conflict, divorce, desperation and loss of hope. Don’t Be Alone I... Wylder MD, Bex Buy New $8.99 (as of 03:33 UTC - Details)
Americans are like a herd of sheep backed against a cliff with no place to go. They are being backed against a precipice by expert fearmongers pretending they are foxes in fox skins. Sooner or later the sheep jump off the cliff thinking there is no other way out. America is now facing that kind of horrid moment
when its people do themselves in.
We live in a highly interdependent society.
The trash man must do his work or streets will fill with waste and public hygiene becomes a bigger issue than the coronavirus. Rats will run wild splurging on the garbage that mounts. The Plague might return if rats are given garbage to eat.
The slaughterhouse must process meat or the animals must be slain and buried.
The cows must be milked or the babies will go without infant formula.
Too many Americans are resigning from their jobs that make contact with the public because they think they are going to get the virus and die.
But you do death-defying things every day.
We depend on each other
AMERICA GO BACK TO WORK! Don’t listen to the so-called experts. You are risking the lives of your loved ones and millions of other unless co-dependent Americans return to work. We depend on each other.
We have already dismantled our safety net and hospitals and doctors’ offices have closed for good. Don’t help dismantle America. Remember the nursery rhyme: all the kings’ horses and all the kings’ men couldn’t put Humpty Dumpty together again. Think that you are going back to work so your family does not go without food and medicine. High Risk: Stories of ... Karkowsky MD, Chavi Eve Best Price: $7.47 Buy New $15.87 (as of 03:33 UTC - Details)
Infectious but not deadly
The COVID-19 coronavirus is very infectious, but not deadly. If you don’t get infected and develop life-long antibodies you will be vulnerable to this disease. You can wait for a vaccine, which is a minute-dose of the virus itself, but there is a very remote chance a vaccine will ever materialize. Microbiologists have been working on a coronavirus vaccine for over 8 years now. All of the coronavirus vaccines failed to be licensed.
Don’t make a guinea pig out of yourself
If you elect to vaccinate you will be submitting yourself to a giant human experiment. Regardless of whether the vaccine works or not, there will be a predicted 1% risk of side effects (1 in 100 we learn from flu-shot studies) that would be severe enough to cause hospitalization….. which means 3,280,000 Americans would need to be hospitalized out of 328 million population. Those numbers would overwhelm hospitals that only have ~100,000 critical care (intensive care unit) beds.
Using data from an influenza vaccine study, hospitalization could result in 1% death rate (1% of 1%, or 1 in 200) possible risk of death, or 32,800 needless deaths in the U.S.
The vaccine may be perfectly safe, at least in healthy adults. But once hospitalized, medication errors, antibiotic resistance, over-use of ventilators, medication interactions, may result in the demise of the patient. The vaccine will be declared perfectly safe, but hospitalization itself is risky. The Chronic Fatigue Sy... Ortleb, Charles Best Price: $16.55 Buy New $17.95 (as of 05:07 UTC - Details)
Vaccination is problematic. The vaccine is a little bit of the COVID-19 coronavirus itself. You expose yourself to a little bit of the virus in hopes you develop sufficient antibodies that will provide you with life-long immunity. But about 40% of people don’t develop sufficient antibodies.
If you are diabetic, are obese, take immune suppressant drugs, have dark skin and therefore low sunshine vitamin D blood levels, then any vaccine may not produce sufficient antibodies against the COVID-19 coronavirus and you stand a chance of developing the horrid symptoms of full-blown coronavirus lung infection.
The other epidemic: Vitamin D deficiency
COVID-19 patients have lower blood levels of vitamin D. In one study of COVID-19 infected patients, 74% were vitamin D insufficient or deficient. Another study shows 100% of those patients hospitalized for COVID-19 coronavirus infection over the age of 75 were vitamin D deficient. Don’t give any credence to news stories you read that there is no evidence that vitamin D is helpful for COVID-19. You hear these negative news stories because the news press is in league with the vaccine makers to make you plead for vaccination. In one study only 2% of the patients with normal vitamin D levels were in critical condition versus 59% of those with low vitamin D blood levels. Health authorities in England have already issued a declaration for their population to start taking vitamin D supplements.
I The Vitamin D Revoluti... Soram Khalsa Best Price: $1.25 Buy New $10.69 (as of 08:00 UTC - Details) f you have been staying indoors for a couple months now you have been depriving yourself of sunshine vitamin D. Your liver is supposed to store 3 months of vitamin D to get humans through winter when cold weather keeps people indoors, away from sunshine. We also wrap ourselves in warm clothing in winter that keep warmth in, but blocks skin exposure to solar radiation that is required to produce vitamin D. You need to be outdoors in midday sun with skin exposed to make natural vitamin D. Presume your vitamin D blood levels are low and supplement your diet with the newly recommended 8000 units of vitamin D daily.
Did you know there is a belt around the earth of countries that report almost no deaths from COVID-19 coronavirus? That belt is centered on the equator. Equatorial countries receive more solar ultraviolet radiation because the atmosphere sun rays pass through is thinner. You can mimic this protective effect by taking sunshine vitamin D in a bottle – vitamin D pills. And you ask why public health authorities and the news media don’t tell you this. Yes, it’s a shame.
More than 90% of people who are infected with the COVID-19 coronavirus experience no symptoms or mild symptoms. If you supplement your diet with zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C and selenium, you will improve your odds of experiencing symptomless infection and life-long antibody protection.
Lockdowns and quarantines don’t work
A report published in EURO SURVEILLANCE indicates only a very strict, almost 100% compliance with a lockdown and immediate isolation of those who exhibit symptoms would need to be achieved to effectively block its transmission and spread. Just the matriculation of health care workers to mix with infected patients results in a third of the infections. Just emergency personnel such as law enforcement and paramedics would eventually spread this virus. Just visits to the grocery store violate a complete lockdown. There is no way to completely lockdown a modern society. Only small households with 2 or at most 3 family members will be able to slow the transmission of the disease. Germany’s BILD newspaper says “lockdown was a huge mistake.” Then your only option, without a vaccine, is to optimize your immune system to develop life-long antibody protection. Organic Zinc Sulfate L... Buy New $18.95 ($4.74 / Fl Oz) (as of 02:28 UTC - Details)
Another word of caution: synthetic vaccines today often don’t provide life-long immunity. This is why we see outbreaks of measles in school children these days.
Do we need to vaccinate?
According to the most recent data, 93% of the American population that has been infected with COVID-19 coronavirus has recovered. By taking dietary supplements (vitamins C, D, minerals zinc and selenium) the remaining 7% of individuals would prime their immune system and be expected to develop antibodies and life-long immunity.
If you remain in lockdown you just delay inevitable exposure to this virus. Health authorities want people to beg for the vaccine so they can test it on you. Don’t let them make a guinea pig out of you!
How to avoid viral mutations
Will the virus die off once large populations develop antibodies against it? There is concern the COVID-19 coronavirus may return with a vengeance. Once the virus is in circulation and many people fighting it off, developing antibodies without symptoms, the virus may mutate. Individuals in the population who are being freshly exposed to the COVID-19 coronavirus may experience a mutation, a different viral strain that is more or less lethal. It is important for individuals to ensure they consume enough selenium, a trace mineral, that prevents viral mutations and has been demonstrated to improve the cure rate by 500% to protect large populations from the COVID-19 coronavirus.
The choice is yours Americans. Your country is rotting away without you. GET BACK TO WORK!
P.S. – Forward this report to your timid and fearful friends and family. Yes, we are all in this together, but we also want out of this together.
Premium Liposomal Vita... Buy New $28.95 ($4.82 / Fl Oz) (as of 02:41 UTC - Details) Selenium 200mcg for Th... Buy New $16.95 ($0.19 / Count) (as of 03:32 UTC - Details)


lewrockwell--2020-05-20--Forgotten Moments From the History of Vaccines; Yes, History Matters

Scientific propaganda about vaccines has reached dizzying heights , as officials point the uninformed public toward the Day of Liberation , when a COVID shot , otherwise known as God , will rescue Earth .
Here , from a chapter in my 1988 book , AIDS INC. , is an excerpt exposing some of the infamous moments in vaccination history—hidden by the press , or simply forgotten .
For those denialists who cling to the notion that vaccines are remarkably safe and effective , this article is a pill you can swallow , bitter to be sure , but immunizing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bent medical establishment .
Understand : this is only a partial history of disasters and revelations , and it stops at 1988 .
AIDS Inc. Rappoport , Jon Best Price : $ 33.29 Buy New $ 18.89 “ The combined death rate from scarlet fever , diphtheria , whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization .
In part , this recession may be attributed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virulence of micro-organisms , but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.
” Ivan Illich , Medical Nemesis , Bantam Books , 1977 “ In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough , for example , even fully immunized children contracted the disease in fairly large numbers ; and the rates of serious complications and death were reduced only slightly .
In another recent outbreak of pertussis , 46 of the 85 fully immunized children studied eventually contracted the disease.
” “ In 1977 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the campus of UCLA , in a population that was supposedly 91 % immune , according to careful serological testing .
Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos , New Mexico , area within a period of a few months in 1981 , and 75 % of them had been fully immunized , some of them quite recently .
A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15 % of this age group are still susceptible to rubella , a figure essentially identical with that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , although the overall incidence of typical acute measles in the U.S. has dropped sharply from about 400,000 cases annually in the early 1960s to about 30,000 cases by 1974-76 , the death rate remained exactly the same ; and , with the peak incidence now occurring in adolescents and young adults , the risk of pneumonia and demonstrable liver abnormalities has actually increased substantially , according to one recent study , to well over 3 % and 2 % , respectively.
” Richard Moskowitz , MD , The Case Against Immunizations , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fire Your Doctor !
How ... Andrew Saul Best Price : $ 6.40 Buy New $ 1.99 “ Of all reported whooping cough cases between 1979 and 1984 in children over 7 months of age – that is , old enough to have received the primary course of the DPT shots ( diphtheria , pertussis , tetanus ) – 41 % occurred in children who had received three or more shots and 22 % in children who had one or two immunizations.
” “ Among children under 7 months of age who had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immunized between one and three times… ” “ … Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions , an FDA-financed study at the University of California , Los Angeles , one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion ; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming [ can indicate brain damage ] ; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more.
” Jennifer Hyman , Democrat and Chronicle , Rochester , New York , special supplement on DPT , dated April , 1987 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the University of California , Los Angeles , under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration , and which has been confirmed by other studies , indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations , and these are classified as SIDS ( Sudden Infant Death Syndrome ) deaths .
These represent about 10 to 15 % of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. ( between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used ) .
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CW Daniel Company Limited , Saffron Walden , Essex , England , 1987 .
Doctor Yourself : Natur ... Saul , Andrew W PH.D. Best Price : $ 24.27 Buy New $ 28.28 “ Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt , Jr. , MD , testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources , rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions , 9,000 cases of collapse , and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” DPT : A Shot in the Dark , by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer , Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
“ While 70-80 % of British children were immunized against pertussis in 1970-71 , the rate is now 39 % .
The committee predicts that the next pertussis epidemic will probably turn out to be more severe than the one in 1974/75 .
However , they do not explain why , in 1970/71 , there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with a declining rate of vaccination , a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.
” Wolfgang Ehrengut , Lancet , Feb. 18 , 1978 , p. 370 .
“ … Barker and Pichichero , in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver , Colorado , found after DTP that only 7 % of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions , which included pyrexia ( 53 % ) , acute behavioral changes ( 82 % ) , prolonged screaming ( 13 % ) , and listlessness , anorexia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored.
” Lancet , May 28 , 1983 , p. 1217 “ Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries , including those in which there has been no immunization .
The decline began long before vaccination was developed .
There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease ; in fact , over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Immunization , p. 58 .
The Treatment Trap : Ho ... Singh , Janardan Prasad Best Price : $ 8.42 Buy New $ 7.90 “ Pertussis ( whooping cough ) immunization is controversial , as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity .
The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects… annual deaths , per million children , from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies , shows that from a high point of just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under age 15 ) in 1905 , the decline has been consistent and dramatic .
There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80 % by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale , in the mid-nineteen fifties .
The decline has continued , albeit at a slower rate , ever since .
No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use.
” Chaitow , Vaccination and Immunization , p. 63 .
“ … the swine-flu vaccination program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ greatest blunders .
It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix , N.J. , was similar to the swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918 .
Health officials immediately launched a 100-million dollar program to immunize every American .
But the expected epidemic never materialized , and the vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people .
There were 32 deaths.
” U.S. News and World Report , Joseph Carey , October 14 , 1985 , p. 70 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ Despite ( cases ) in which ( smallpox ) vaccination plainly failed to protect the population , and despite the rampant side-effects of the methods , the proponents of vaccination continued their attempts to justify the methods by claims that the disease had declined in Europe as a whole during the period of its compulsory use .
If the decline could be correlated with the use of the vaccination , then all else could be set aside , and the advantage between its current low incidence could be shown to outweigh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and to favour the continued use of vaccination .
However , the credit for the decline in the incidence of smallpox could not be given to vaccination .
The fact is that its incidence declined in all parts of Europe , whether or not vaccination was employed.
” Chaitow , Vaccination and Immunization , pp .
6-7 .
“ Smallpox , like typhus , has been dying out ( in England ) since 1780 .
Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1871-2 ( which occurred after extensive vaccination ) .
” W. Scott Webb , A Century of Vaccination , Swan Sonnenschein , 1898 .
The Doctors Book of Ho ... Prevention Magazine Ed ... Best Price : $ 0.15 Buy New $ 9.28 “ In this incident ( Kyoto , Japan , 1948 ) – the most serious of its kind – a toxic batch of alum-precipitated toxoid ( APT ) was responsible for illness in over 600 infants and for no fewer than 68 deaths.
” “ On 20 and 22 October @ @ @ @ @ @ @ babies and children in the city of Kyoto received their first injection of APT .
On the 4th and 5th of November , 15,561 babies and children aged some months to 13 years received their second dose .
One to two days later , 606 of those who had been injected fell ill. Of these , 9 died of acute diphtheritic paralysis in seven to fourteen days , and 59 of late paralysis mainly in four to seven weeks.
” Sir Graham Wilson , Hazards of Immunization , Athone Press , University of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , however , follow the use of this so-called killed ( rabies ) vaccine owing to inadequate processing .
A very serious occurrence of this sort occurred at Fortaleza , Ceara , Brazil , in 1960 .
No fewer than 18 out of 66 persons vaccinated with Fermi ’ s carbolized ( rabies ) vaccine suffered from encephalomyelitis and every one of the eighteen died.
” Sir Graham Wilson , Hazards of Immunization .
“ At a press conference in Washington on 24 July , 1942 , the Secretary of War reported that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the ( American ) Army between 1 January and 4 July after yellow fever vaccination , and of these 62 proved fatal.
” Wilson , Hazards of Immunization .
“ The world ’ s biggest trial ( conducted in south India ) to assess the value of BCG tuberculosis vaccine has made the startling revelation that the vaccine ‘ does not give any protection against bacillary forms of tuberculosis.
’ The study said to be ‘ most exhaustive and meticulous , ’ was launched in 1968 by the Indian Council of Medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta , Georgia.
” Oklahoma City Bombing : ... Jon Rappoport Best Price : $ 7.81 Buy New $ 1.99 “ The incidence of new cases among the BCG vaccinated group was slightly ( but statistically insignificantly ) higher than in the control group , a finding that led to the conclusion that BCG ’ s protective effect ‘ was zero.
’ ” New Scientist , November 15 , 1979 , as quoted by Hans Ruesch in Naked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1982 .
“ Between 10 December 1929 and 30 April 1930 , 251 of 412 infants born in Lubeck received three doses of BCG vaccine by the mouth during the first ten days of life .
Of these 251 , 72 died of tuberculosis , most of them in two to five months and all but one before the end of the first year .
In addition , 135 suffered from clinical tuberculosis but eventually recovered ; and 44 became tuberculin-positive but remained well .
None of the 161 unvaccinated infants born at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and none of these died of tuberculosis within the following three years.
” Hazards of Immunization , Wilson .
“ We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of the 14-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in 2295 high-risk patients… Seventy-one episodes of proved or probable pneumococcal pneumonia or bronchitis occurred among 63 of the patients ( 27 placebo recipients and 36 vaccine recipients ) … We were unable to demonstrate any efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia or bronchitis in this population.
” New England Journal of Medicine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1318 , Michael Simberkoff et al .
“ But already before Salk developed his vaccine , polio had been constantly regressing ; the 39 cases out of every 100,000 inhabitants registered in 1942 had gradually diminished from year to year until they were reduced to only 15 cases in 1952… according to M. Beddow Baylay , the English surgeon and medical historian.
” Slaughter of the Innocent , Hans Reusch , Civitas Publish ers , Switzerland , and Swain , New York , 1983 .
“ Many published stories and reports have stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the public to believe that the sharp reduction of cases ( and of deaths ) from poliomyelitis in 1955 as compared to 1954 is attributable to the Salk vaccine…That it is a misconception follows from these considerations .
The number of children inoculated has been too small to account for the decrease .
The sharp decrease was apparent before the inoculations began or could take effect and was of the same order as the decrease following the immediate post-inoculation period.
” Dr. Herbert Ratner , Child and Family , vol .
20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ So far it is hardly possible to gain insight into the extent of the immunization catastrophe of 1955 in the United States .
It may be considered certain that the officially ascertained 200 cases ( of polio ) which were caused directly or indirectly by the ( polio ) vaccination constitute minimum figures… It can hardly be estimated how many of the 1359 ( polio ) cases among vaccinated persons must be regarded as failures of the vaccine and how many of them were infected by the vaccine .
A careful study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States yields indications of grave significance .
In numerous states of the U.S.A. , typical early epidemics developed with the immunizations in the spring of 1955…The vaccination incidents of the year 1955 can not be exclusively traced back to the failure of one manufacturing firm.
” Dr. Herbert Ratner , Child and Family , 1980 , vol .
19 , no .
4 , “ Story of the Salk Vaccine ( Part 2 ) .
” “ Suffice it to say that most of the large ( polio ) epidemics that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ introduction of the Salk vaccine have followed the wide-scale use of the vaccine and have been characterized by an uncommon early seasonal onset .
To name a few , there is the Massachusetts epidemic of 1955 ; the Chicago epidemic of 1956 ; and the Des Moines epidemic of 1959.
” Dr. Herbert Ratner , Child and Family , 1980 vol .
19 , no .
4 .
“ The live ( Sabin ) poliovirus vaccine has been the predominant cause of domestically arising cases of paralytic poliomyelitis in the United States since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such cases , it would be necessary to discontinue the routine use of live poliovirus vaccine.
” Jonas Salk , Science , March 4 , 1977 , p. 845 .
“ By the ( U.S. ) government ’ s own admission , there has been a 41 % failure rate in persons who were previously vaccinated against the ( measles ) virus.
” Dr. Anthony Morris , John Chriss , BG Young , “ Occurrence of Measles in Previously Vaccinated Individuals , ” 1979 ; presented at a meeting of the American Society @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , April 27 , 1979 .
“ Prior to the time doctors began giving rubella vaccinations , an estimated 85 % of adults were naturally immune to the disease ( for life ) .
Because of immunization , the vast majority of women never acquire natural immunity ( or lifetime protection ) .
” Dr. Robert Mendelsohn , Let ’ s Live , December 1983 , as quoted by Carolyn Reuben in the LA WEEKLY , June 28 , 1985 .
“ Adminstration of KMV ( killed measles vaccine ) apparently set in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only failed to protect children against natural measles , but resulted in heightened susceptibility.
” JAMA Aug. 22 , 1980 , vol .
244 , p. 804 , Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer .
The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with “ an often severe , atypical form of measles .
Atypical measles is characterized by fever , headache… and a diverse rash ( which ) … may consist of a mixture of macules , papules , vesicles , and pustules… ” The above quotes reflect only a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is criminally deceiving to say , “ Vaccines are simple ; they stimulate the immune system and confer immunity against specific germ agents.
” Official reports on vaccine reactions are often at odds with unofficial estimates because of the method of analysis used .
If adverse vaccine-reaction is defined as a small set of possible effects experienced within 72 hours of an inoculation , then figures will be smaller .
But doctors like G.T .
Stewart , of the University of Glasgow , have found through meticulous investigation , including visits to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinated , that reactions as severe as brain-damage ( e.g.
, from the DPT vaccine ) can be overlooked , go unreported and can be assumed to have come from other causes .
—Well , that was my finding , in 1988 , when I looked beneath the surface of the vaccine question .
Now we are in very deep waters .
COVID-19 hysteria has been tuned up to the NEED for a vaccine .
WE need to slough off this promoted bad dream and stand firm against the little gods who traffic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ office , hospital , school , drug store , and tented parking lot—making them into shooting galleries .
We already have natural immune systems .
They work .
The Best of Jon Rappoport

Scientific propaganda about vaccines has reached dizzying heights, as officials point the uninformed public toward the Day of Liberation, when a COVID shot, otherwise known as God, will rescue Earth.
Here, from a chapter in my 1988 book, AIDS INC., is an excerpt exposing some of the infamous moments in vaccination history—hidden by the press, or simply forgotten.
For those denialists who cling to the notion that vaccines are remarkably safe and effective, this article is a pill you can swallow, bitter to be sure, but immunizing against the effects of bald lies from the bent medical establishment.
Understand: this is only a partial history of disasters and revelations, and it stops at 1988. AIDS Inc. Rappoport, Jon Best Price: $33.29 Buy New $18.89 (as of 03:34 UTC - Details)
“The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.” Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977
“In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough, for example, even fully immunized children contracted the disease in fairly large numbers; and the rates of serious complications and death were reduced only slightly. In another recent outbreak of pertussis, 46 of the 85 fully immunized children studied eventually contracted the disease.”
“In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on the campus of UCLA, in a population that was supposedly 91% immune, according to careful serological testing. Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos, New Mexico, area within a period of a few months in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immunized, some of them quite recently. A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15% of this age group are still susceptible to rubella, a figure essentially identical with that of the pre-vaccine era.”
“Finally, although the overall incidence of typical acute measles in the U.S. has dropped sharply from about 400,000 cases annually in the early 1960s to about 30,000 cases by 1974-76, the death rate remained exactly the same; and, with the peak incidence now occurring in adolescents and young adults, the risk of pneumonia and demonstrable liver abnormalities has actually increased substantially, according to one recent study, to well over 3% and 2%, respectively.” Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983, American Institute of Homeopathy. Fire Your Doctor! How ... Andrew Saul Best Price: $6.40 Buy New $1.99 (as of 11:00 UTC - Details)
“Of all reported whooping cough cases between 1979 and 1984 in children over 7 months of age – that is, old enough to have received the primary course of the DPT shots (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) – 41% occurred in children who had received three or more shots and 22% in children who had one or two immunizations.”
“Among children under 7 months of age who had whooping cough, 34% had been immunized between one and three times…”
“… Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming [can indicate brain damage]; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more.” Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987.
“A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used).” Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987.
Doctor Yourself: Natur... Saul, Andrew W PH.D. Best Price: $24.27 Buy New $28.28 (as of 03:19 UTC - Details) “Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
“While 70-80% of British children were immunized against pertussis in 1970-71, the rate is now 39%. The committee predicts that the next pertussis epidemic will probably turn out to be more severe than the one in 1974/75. However, they do not explain why, in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.” Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370.
“… Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored.” Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217
“Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58.
The Treatment Trap: Ho... Singh, Janardan Prasad Best Price: $8.42 Buy New $7.90 (as of 03:41 UTC - Details) “Pertussis (whooping cough) immunization is controversial, as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity. The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects… annual deaths, per million children, from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies, shows that from a high point of just under 900 deaths per million children (under age 15) in 1905, the decline has been consistent and dramatic. There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80% by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale, in the mid-nineteen fifties. The decline has continued, albeit at a slower rate, ever since. No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use.” Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 63.
“… the swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths.” U.S. News and World Report, Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, “How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases.”
“Despite (cases) in which (smallpox) vaccination plainly failed to protect the population, and despite the rampant side-effects of the methods, the proponents of vaccination continued their attempts to justify the methods by claims that the disease had declined in Europe as a whole during the period of its compulsory use. If the decline could be correlated with the use of the vaccination, then all else could be set aside, and the advantage between its current low incidence could be shown to outweigh the periodic failures of the method, and to favour the continued use of vaccination. However, the credit for the decline in the incidence of smallpox could not be given to vaccination. The fact is that its incidence declined in all parts of Europe, whether or not vaccination was employed.” Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, pp. 6-7.
“Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after extensive vaccination).” W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898. The Doctors Book of Ho... Prevention Magazine Ed... Best Price: $0.15 Buy New $9.28 (as of 02:47 UTC - Details)
“In this incident (Kyoto, Japan, 1948) – the most serious of its kind – a toxic batch of alum-precipitated toxoid (APT) was responsible for illness in over 600 infants and for no fewer than 68 deaths.”
“On 20 and 22 October, 1948, a large number of babies and children in the city of Kyoto received their first injection of APT. On the 4th and 5th of November, 15,561 babies and children aged some months to 13 years received their second dose. One to two days later, 606 of those who had been injected fell ill. Of these, 9 died of acute diphtheritic paralysis in seven to fourteen days, and 59 of late paralysis mainly in four to seven weeks.” Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization, Athone Press, University of London, 1967.
“Accidents may, however, follow the use of this so-called killed (rabies) vaccine owing to inadequate processing. A very serious occurrence of this sort occurred at Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, in 1960. No fewer than 18 out of 66 persons vaccinated with Fermi’s carbolized (rabies ) vaccine suffered from encephalomyelitis and every one of the eighteen died.” Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization.
“At a press conference in Washington on 24 July, 1942, the Secretary of War reported that 28,585 cases of jaundice had been observed in the (American) Army between 1 January and 4 July after yellow fever vaccination, and of these 62 proved fatal.” Wilson, Hazards of Immunization.
“The world’s biggest trial (conducted in south India) to assess the value of BCG tuberculosis vaccine has made the startling revelation that the vaccine ‘does not give any protection against bacillary forms of tuberculosis.’ The study said to be ‘most exhaustive and meticulous,’ was launched in 1968 by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) with assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia.” Oklahoma City Bombing:... Jon Rappoport Best Price: $7.81 Buy New $1.99 (as of 07:45 UTC - Details)
“The incidence of new cases among the BCG vaccinated group was slightly (but statistically insignificantly) higher than in the control group, a finding that led to the conclusion that BCG’s protective effect ‘was zero.’” New Scientist, November 15, 1979, as quoted by Hans Ruesch in Naked Empress, Civis Publishers, Switzerland, 1982.
“Between 10 December 1929 and 30 April 1930, 251 of 412 infants born in Lubeck received three doses of BCG vaccine by the mouth during the first ten days of life. Of these 251, 72 died of tuberculosis, most of them in two to five months and all but one before the end of the first year. In addition, 135 suffered from clinical tuberculosis but eventually recovered; and 44 became tuberculin-positive but remained well. None of the 161 unvaccinated infants born at the time was affected in this way and none of these died of tuberculosis within the following three years.” Hazards of Immunization, Wilson.
“We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of the 14-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in 2295 high-risk patients… Seventy-one episodes of proved or probable pneumococcal pneumonia or bronchitis occurred among 63 of the patients (27 placebo recipients and 36 vaccine recipients)… We were unable to demonstrate any efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia or bronchitis in this population.” New England Journal of Medicine, November 20, 1986, p. 1318, Michael Simberkoff et al.
“But already before Salk developed his vaccine, polio had been constantly regressing; the 39 cases out of every 100,000 inhabitants registered in 1942 had gradually diminished from year to year until they were reduced to only 15 cases in 1952… according to M. Beddow Baylay, the English surgeon and medical historian.” Slaughter of the Innocent, Hans Reusch, Civitas Publish ers, Switzerland, and Swain, New York, 1983.
“Many published stories and reports have stated, implied and otherwise led professional people and the public to believe that the sharp reduction of cases (and of deaths) from poliomyelitis in 1955 as compared to 1954 is attributable to the Salk vaccine…That it is a misconception follows from these considerations. The number of children inoculated has been too small to account for the decrease. The sharp decrease was apparent before the inoculations began or could take effect and was of the same order as the decrease following the immediate post-inoculation period.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, vol. 20, no. 1, 1987.
“So far it is hardly possible to gain insight into the extent of the immunization catastrophe of 1955 in the United States. It may be considered certain that the officially ascertained 200 cases (of polio) which were caused directly or indirectly by the (polio) vaccination constitute minimum figures… It can hardly be estimated how many of the 1359 (polio) cases among vaccinated persons must be regarded as failures of the vaccine and how many of them were infected by the vaccine. A careful study of the epidemiologic course of polio in the United States yields indications of grave significance. In numerous states of the U.S.A., typical early epidemics developed with the immunizations in the spring of 1955…The vaccination incidents of the year 1955 cannot be exclusively traced back to the failure of one manufacturing firm.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980, vol. 19, no. 4, “Story of the Salk Vaccine (Part 2).”
“Suffice it to say that most of the large (polio) epidemics that have occurred in this country since the introduction of the Salk vaccine have followed the wide-scale use of the vaccine and have been characterized by an uncommon early seasonal onset. To name a few, there is the Massachusetts epidemic of 1955; the Chicago epidemic of 1956; and the Des Moines epidemic of 1959.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980 vol. 19, no. 4.
“The live (Sabin) poliovirus vaccine has been the predominant cause of domestically arising cases of paralytic poliomyelitis in the United States since 1972. To avoid the occurrence of such cases, it would be necessary to discontinue the routine use of live poliovirus vaccine.” Jonas Salk, Science, March 4, 1977, p. 845.
“By the (U.S.) government’s own admission, there has been a 41% failure rate in persons who were previously vaccinated against the (measles) virus.” Dr. Anthony Morris, John Chriss, BG Young, “Occurrence of Measles in Previously Vaccinated Individuals,” 1979; presented at a meeting of the American Society for Microbiology at Fort Detrick, Maryland, April 27, 1979.
“Prior to the time doctors began giving rubella vaccinations, an estimated 85% of adults were naturally immune to the disease (for life). Because of immunization, the vast majority of women never acquire natural immunity (or lifetime protection).” Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, Let’s Live, December 1983, as quoted by Carolyn Reuben in the LA WEEKLY, June 28, 1985.
“Adminstration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”
The above quotes reflect only a mere fraction of an available literature.
It is criminally deceiving to say, “Vaccines are simple; they stimulate the immune system and confer immunity against specific germ agents.”
Official reports on vaccine reactions are often at odds with unofficial estimates because of the method of analysis used. If adverse vaccine-reaction is defined as a small set of possible effects experienced within 72 hours of an inoculation, then figures will be smaller. But doctors like G.T. Stewart, of the University of Glasgow, have found through meticulous investigation, including visits to hospitals and interviews with parents of children vaccinated, that reactions as severe as brain-damage (e.g., from the DPT vaccine) can be overlooked, go unreported and can be assumed to have come from other causes.
—Well, that was my finding, in 1988, when I looked beneath the surface of the vaccine question.
Now we are in very deep waters. COVID-19 hysteria has been tuned up to the NEED for a vaccine.
WE need to slough off this promoted bad dream and stand firm against the little gods who traffic their vials in every doctor’s office, hospital, school, drug store, and tented parking lot—making them into shooting galleries.
We already have natural immune systems. They work.
Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
The Best of Jon Rappoport


lewrockwell--2020-05-20--Right To Work and the Betrayal by Lockdowns

The right to work in this blog is not the phrase as used for union issues .
It ’ s the natural right .
For us human beings , work means “ Such effort or activity by which one makes a living ; employment.
” Your right to work means that at your voluntary option you may make employment exchanges or bargains with other people with similar liberty ; and at the same time people external to the bargaining parties , i.e.
, other than you and the people you are exchanging with , may not coerce either of you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work arrangement .
Right to work doesn ’ t mean that anyone owes you any stuff like this : “ …technical and vocational guidance and training programmes , policies and techniques to achieve steady economic , social and cultural development and full and productive employment under conditions safeguarding fundamental political and economic freedoms to the individual.
” Nor do you owe anyone an affirmative action or non-discrimination aspect of your bargain .
Obviously , labor laws in the U.S. prevent you from exercising your right to work fully and freely .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administers and enforces more than 180 federal laws .
These mandates and the regulations that implement them cover many workplace activities for about 150 million workers and 10 million workplaces.
” The Declaration Of Ind ... Fathers , Founding Best Price : $ 5.98 Buy New $ 6.89 We do not live in a free country .
The lockdowns are even more totalitarian than the labor laws and regulations on the books .
They prevent you from working even if you are obeying all the existing labor laws !
Did your legislatures pass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ list shows that state governors in the U.S. mainly did this .
Health authorities , counties and cities seem also to have instigated lockdowns .
In the name of a health measure , state governors infringed the natural right to work .
It ’ s a natural right because that ’ s how you sustain yourself and live .
That ’ s how you pursue happiness .
If you are denied the means to “ Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness ” , you can not have or secure those natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a natural right because it ’ s necessary to achieve the major ends of life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness ; and the making of voluntary work arrangements involves only the presumed justly-held property of the participants making the exchange .
By ordering lockdowns , these governors betrayed the Declaration of Independence “ …That to secure these Rights , Governments are instituted… ” They betrayed us .
They betrayed their states .
They betrayed their country .
They may have done so in panic or mistakenly or to look good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of reasons , but there is no doubt .
Their lockdowns orders were and are betrayals .
The governors betrayed our principles .
There is no point in having principles , such as individual rights to work , to life , to liberty and to the pursuit of happiness , if they are violated hastily and unlawfully and then replaced by their very opposites .
It ’ s worthy of the term “ betrayal ” Supposing that our governments are actually designed to possess “ …just Powers from the Consent of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can lockdowns that abrogate natural rights possibly be exercises of “ just Powers ” ?
How can government actions that do the very opposite of securing rights , which is the main purpose and end of our governments , be seen as anything other than exercises of UNJUST powers ?
Seiko Men ’ s SGG7 ... Buy New $ 137.48 To implement one ’ s right to work generally involves travel on public roads .
Does the government ’ s presence in the system of roads render right to work an empty idea @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barrier ?
Not one whit .
Highway departments maintain roads , governments get them built , but the funding comes from taxes at all levels .
Taxpayers own the roads , not your City Manager or County Supervisor .
They are your agents .
The right to work includes rights to travel on the roads , over bridges , through tunnels , etc .
Having paid for them , they are your property , jointly owned to be sure , but meant to be available so that you exercise your rights to life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They too are essential parts of the larger right to work .
They are necessary means , and the use of them can not coercively be prevented by governments without violating your right to work .
If courts understand and defend the police power as an essential if unstated part of government constitutions , then why should they not also understand and defend the right to work as an essential right of We the People ?
Why should we all not recognize it and strongly resist its abrogation ?
These lockdown orders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to think that putting millions out of work can stop an epidemic , especially one that ’ s already well underway .
Its madness and ignorance to think this can be done without causing a great many more deaths by other follow-on effects of the lockdowns .
In sum , all people , including Americans , have a right to work , a natural right .
It follows from the basic rights of life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness .
And following from the right to work are rights of travel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who largely work and also use those means for other ends .
For whatever motivations , governors issued lockdown orders denying the exercise of the right to work , without which life can not long be sustained .
This is reason enough alone to condemn the lockdown measures strongly .
The Best of Michael S. Rozeff

The right to work in this blog is not the phrase as used for union issues. It’s the natural right. For us human beings, work means “Such effort or activity by which one makes a living; employment.” Your right to work means that at your voluntary option you may make employment exchanges or bargains with other people with similar liberty; and at the same time people external to the bargaining parties, i.e., other than you and the people you are exchanging with, may not coerce either of you to prevent, change or modify the work arrangement.
Right to work doesn’t mean that anyone owes you any stuff like this: “…technical and vocational guidance and training programmes, policies and techniques to achieve steady economic, social and cultural development and full and productive employment under conditions safeguarding fundamental political and economic freedoms to the individual.” Nor do you owe anyone an affirmative action or non-discrimination aspect of your bargain.
Obviously, labor laws in the U.S. prevent you from exercising your right to work fully and freely. “The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) administers and enforces more than 180 federal laws. These mandates and the regulations that implement them cover many workplace activities for about 150 million workers and 10 million workplaces.” The Declaration Of Ind... Fathers, Founding Best Price: $5.98 Buy New $6.89 (as of 03:35 UTC - Details)
We do not live in a free country.
The lockdowns are even more totalitarian than the labor laws and regulations on the books. They prevent you from working even if you are obeying all the existing labor laws!
Did your legislatures pass lockdown laws? No. One available list shows that state governors in the U.S. mainly did this. Health authorities, counties and cities seem also to have instigated lockdowns.
In the name of a health measure, state governors infringed the natural right to work. It’s a natural right because that’s how you sustain yourself and live. That’s how you pursue happiness. If you are denied the means to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, you cannot have or secure those natural rights. The right to work follows as a natural right because it’s necessary to achieve the major ends of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; and the making of voluntary work arrangements involves only the presumed justly-held property of the participants making the exchange.
By ordering lockdowns, these governors betrayed the Declaration of Independence “…That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted…” They betrayed us. They betrayed their states. They betrayed their country. They may have done so in panic or mistakenly or to look good or to save lives or for any number of reasons, but there is no doubt. Their lockdowns orders were and are betrayals.
The governors betrayed our principles. There is no point in having principles, such as individual rights to work, to life, to liberty and to the pursuit of happiness, if they are violated hastily and unlawfully and then replaced by their very opposites. It’s worthy of the term “betrayal”
Supposing that our governments are actually designed to possess “…just Powers from the Consent of the Governed…” as the Declaration says, can lockdowns that abrogate natural rights possibly be exercises of “just Powers”? How can government actions that do the very opposite of securing rights, which is the main purpose and end of our governments, be seen as anything other than exercises of UNJUST powers? Seiko Men’s SGG7... Buy New $137.48 (as of 03:35 UTC - Details)
To implement one’s right to work generally involves travel on public roads. Does the government’s presence in the system of roads render right to work an empty idea, stymied because of a property rights barrier? Not one whit. Highway departments maintain roads, governments get them built, but the funding comes from taxes at all levels. Taxpayers own the roads, not your City Manager or County Supervisor. They are your agents. The right to work includes rights to travel on the roads, over bridges, through tunnels, etc. Having paid for them, they are your property, jointly owned to be sure, but meant to be available so that you exercise your rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They too are essential parts of the larger right to work. They are necessary means, and the use of them cannot coercively be prevented by governments without violating your right to work.
If courts understand and defend the police power as an essential if unstated part of government constitutions, then why should they not also understand and defend the right to work as an essential right of We the People? Why should we all not recognize it and strongly resist its abrogation?
These lockdown orders were extreme. It’s madness to think that putting millions out of work can stop an epidemic, especially one that’s already well underway. Its madness and ignorance to think this can be done without causing a great many more deaths by other follow-on effects of the lockdowns.
In sum, all people, including Americans, have a right to work, a natural right. It follows from the basic rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And following from the right to work are rights of travel over means paid for by taxpayers, who largely work and also use those means for other ends.
For whatever motivations, governors issued lockdown orders denying the exercise of the right to work, without which life cannot long be sustained. This is reason enough alone to condemn the lockdown measures strongly.
The Best of Michael S. Rozeff