lewrockwell--2020-11-11--More Than 80% of Covid Patients Are Vitamin D Deficient

Aside from insulin resistance , discussed in “ The Real Pandemic Is Insulin Resistance , ” vitamin D deficiency has emerged as a primary risk factor for severe COVID-19 infection and death .
Higher vitamin D levels have even been shown to lower your risk of testing positive for the virus in the first place .
Getting the word out about this — especially to the Black community and the elderly in nursing homes — could have a significant impact on future hospitalization and death rates from this virus .
If you have a loved one in a nursing home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the medical management about vitamin D testing and supplementation could also make a big difference in the general health of all the residents , as vitamin D is something that can strengthen your immune system in a matter of a few weeks and has many health benefits beside lowering your risk of viral illness .
The Optimal Dose : Rest ... Judson Somerville MD Best Price : $ 9.96 Buy New $ 9.98 According to a Spanish study1,2,3 published online October 27 , 2020 , in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were found to be deficient in vitamin D , the medical term for which is 25-hydroxycholecalciferol ( 25OHD ) .
The researchers compared the vitamin D levels of 216 COVID-19 patients and 197 population-based controls , finding that hospitalized COVID-19 patients had a higher prevalence of deficiency and had lower vitamin D levels overall .
As reported by the authors:4 While this particular study failed to find a correlation between vitamin D levels and disease severity , other studies have shown patients with higher levels do tend to have milder disease .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risk of developing a severe case of , and dying from , COVID-19 virtually disappears once your vitamin D level gets above 30 ng/mL ( 75 nmol/L ) .
Back in June 2020 , I launched an information campaign about vitamin D that included the release of a downloadable scientific report .
This report , as well as a two-minute COVID risk quiz is available on StopCovidCold.com .
October 31 , 2020 , my review paper7 “ Evidence Regarding Vitamin D and Risk of COVID-19 and Its Severity , ” co-written with William @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wagner , both of whom are part of the GrassrootsHealth expert vitamin D panel , was also published in the peer-reviewed journal Nutrients .
You can read the paper for free on the journal ’ s website .
It will be officially published later this month .
NatureWise Vitamin D3 ... Best Price : null Buy New $ 10.99 ( $ 0.12 / Count ) As noted in that paper , dark skin color , increased age , pre-existing chronic conditions and vitamin D deficiency are all features of severe COVID disease , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the only factor that is modifiable .
As such , it would be foolish to ignore , especially since vitamin D supplements are readily available and low cost .
Vitamin D can reduce your risk of COVID-19 and other respiratory infections via several different mechanisms , including but not limited to the following , all of which are discussed in greater detail in our paper:8 • Reducing the survival and replication of viruses • Maintaining endothelial integrity ( Endothelial dysfunction contributes to vascular inflammation and impaired blood clotting , two hallmarks of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2 ( ACE2 ) concentrations .
As explained in our paper : Vitamin D also boosts your overall immune function by modulating your innate and adaptive immune responses , reduces respiratory distress10 and improves overall lung function , helps produce surfactants in your lungs that aid in fluid clearance.11 Dr. Amy Myers Vitamin ... Buy New $ 31.97 ( $ 0.53 / Count ) It lowers your risk of comorbidities associated with poor COVID-19 prognosis , including obesity,12 Type 2 diabetes,13 high blood pressure14 and heart disease.15 All of these factors make it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatment .
As of September 27 , 2020 , the data from 14 observational studies — summarized in Table 1 of our paper16 — suggest that vitamin D blood levels are inversely correlated with the incidence and/or severity of COVID-19 , and the evidence currently available generally satisfies Hill ’ s criteria for causality in a biological system , which include:17 • Coherence ( although it still needs to be verified experimentally ) In our paper,18 we review several features of COVID-19 that are indicative of vitamin D deficiency .
For starters , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ northern hemisphere , and as we moved into summer , positive tests , hospitalizations and death rates fell .
So , generally , COVID-19 prevalence has been inversely correlated with solar UVB doses and vitamin D production .
Secondly , people with darker skin have higher COVID-19 case and death rates than Caucasians .
Vitamin D is produced in your skin in response to sun exposure , but the darker your skin , the more sun exposure you need in order to maintain an optimal vitamin D level .
Nature Made Extra Stre @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 14.72 ( $ 0.08 / Count ) While a light-skinned individual may need only 10 to 15 minutes a day , a person with very dark skin may need upward of 1.5 hours .
As a result , vitamin D deficiency tends to be far higher among Blacks and dark-skinned Hispanics .
Thirdly , one of the lethal hallmarks of COVID-19 is the cytokine storm that can develop in severe cases , which manifests as hyperinflammation and tissue damage .
Vitamin D is known to regulate inflammatory cytokine production , thereby lowering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is an important regulator of your immune system , and dysregulation of the immune system is a hallmark of severe COVID-19 .
The largest observational study19 to date was published in the journal PLOS ONE , September 17 , 2020 .
It looked at data for 191,779 American patients with a mean age of 50 who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between March and June 2020 and had had their vitamin D tested sometime in the preceding 12 months .
It found : • 12.5 % of patients who had a vitamin D level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive for SARS-CoV-2 • 8.1 % of those who had a vitamin D level between 30 and 34 ng/ml ( adequacy ) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 • Only 5.9 % of those who had an optimal vitamin D level of 55 ng/ml or higher tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 According to the authors:20 Nature Made Vitamin D3 ... Buy New $ 10.49 ( $ 0.03 / Count ) This inverse relationship between vitamin D and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates may be due to the fact that vitamin D reduces survival and replication of the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antimicrobial and antiviral peptides cathelicidin and defensins , and increasing concentrations of free ACE2 , which prevents the virus from entering cells via the ACE2 receptor.21 Higher Vitamin D Lowers All Risks Associated With COVID-19 The argument for vitamin D optimization is strengthened by the fact that higher levels not only reduce your risk of testing positive for the virus but also cut the risk of severe illness , the need for hospitalization and mechanical ventilation , the length of hospitalization , and death .
Examples of this include the following studies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rates — In the PLOS ONE study22 above , people with a vitamin D level of at least 55 ng/mL ( 138 nmol/L ) had a 47 % lower SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate compared to those with a level below 20 ng/mL ( 50 nmol/L ) .
Even after adjustment for gender , age , ethnicity and latitude , the risk of having a positive test result was 43 % lower among those with a vitamin D level of 55 ng/mL compared to those with a level of 20 ng/mL .
This was also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in July 2020 .
Here , those with a vitamin D level above 30 ng/mL ( 75 nmol/L ) had a 59 % lower risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to those with a vitamin D level between 20 ng/mL and 29 ng/mL ( 50 to 74 nmol/L ) , and a 58 % lower risk compared to those with a vitamin D level below 20 ng/mL ( 50 nmol/L ) .
•Lowers hospitalization rates — The Israeli analysis25 above also found that among individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below 30 ng/mL had a 1.95 times ( crude odds ratio ) to 2.09 times ( odds ratio after adjustment for demographics and psychiatric and somatic disorders ) higher risk of being hospitalized for COVID-19 .
In other words , having a vitamin D level below 30 ng/mL about doubled the risk of being hospitalized with COVID-19 .
•Lowers need for intensive care — Vitamin D , when administered to hospitalized patients , can also lower their risk of needing intensive care .
This was demonstrated by Spanish researchers in a small randomized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 .
Hospitalized COVID-19 patients given supplemental calcifediol ( a vitamin D3 analog ) in addition to standard of care — which included the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin — had significantly lower intensive care unit admissions .
Vitafusion Organic D3 ... Buy New $ 9.92 ( $ 0.11 / Count ) Patients in the vitamin D arm received 532 micrograms of calcifediol on the day of admission ( equivalent to 106,400 IUs of vitamin D30 ) followed by 266 mcg on Days 3 and 7 ( equivalent to 53,200 IUs31 ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ once a week until discharge , ICU admission or death .
Of those receiving calcifediol , only 2 % required ICU admission , compared to 50 % of those who did not get calcifediol .
None of those given vitamin D supplementation died , compared to 7.6 % of those in the standard care group .
•Reduces severity of COVID-19 — An August 2020 study32,33 published in the journal Nutrients found patients who had a vitamin D level below 12 ng/mL ( 30 nmol/L ) had a 6.12 times higher risk of severe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have also shown vitamin D deficiency is a common factor among hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 related respiratory failure .
One such study34 found 81 % of the patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 had vitamin D levels below 30 ng/ml ( 75 nmol/L ) ; 24 % had severe vitamin D deficiency ( ≤10 ng/ml or ≤25 nmol/L ) .
•Reduces mortality — The Nutrients study35,36 above also found having a vitamin D level below 12 ng/mL ( 30 nmol/L ) raised the risk of death by 14.7 times , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ above 12 ng/mL .
Similarly , researchers in Indonesia found37 those with a vitamin D level between 21 ng/mL ( 50 nmol/L ) and 29 ng/mL ( 75 nmol/L ) had a 12.55 times higher risk of death than those with a level above 30 ng/mL ( 75 nmol/L ) , and having a level below 20 ng/mL ( 50 nmol/L ) was associated with a 19.12 times higher risk of death .
In an Iranian study,38,39 among COVID-19 patients over the age of 40 who had vitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ died , compared to 9.7 % of those with levels at or above 30 ng/mL .
Among those with a vitamin D level of at least 40 ng/mL ( 100 nmol/L ) , only 6.3 % died .
The Role of Magnesium and Vitamin K2 Healthy in Seven Days : ... Helden , Raimund von Best Price : $ 14.69 Buy New $ 14.88 While regular sun exposure is the ideal way to optimize your vitamin D level , this can be nearly impossible during the winter .
For this reason , an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most people .
However , when supplementing you also need to be mindful of other nutrients that have synergistic effects .
One of them is magnesium , which is required for the conversion of vitamin D into its active form .
Without sufficient amounts of magnesium , your body can not properly utilize the vitamin D you ’ re taking.40,41,42,43 According to a scientific review44,45 published in 2018 , as many as 50 % of Americans taking vitamin D supplements may not get significant benefit as the vitamin D simply gets stored in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for this is because they have insufficient magnesium levels .
Research46 published in 2013 also highlighted this issue , concluding that higher magnesium intake helps reduce your risk of vitamin D deficiency by activating more of it .
Another cofactor is vitamin K2 , as it helps prevent complications associated with excessive calcification in your arteries .
In fact , relative vitamin K2 deficiency is typically what produces symptoms of “ vitamin D toxicity.
” Research by GrassrootsHealth , based on data from nearly 3,000 individuals , reveals you need 244 % more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not also taking magnesium and vitamin K2.47 What this means in practical terms is that if you take all three supplements in combination , you need far less oral vitamin D in order to achieve a healthy vitamin D level .
If you live in the northern hemisphere , which is currently heading toward winter , now is the time to check your vitamin D level and start taking action to raise it if you ’ re below 40 ng/mL ( 100 nmol/L ) .
Experts recommend a vitamin D level between 40 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nmol/L ) .
An easy and cost-effective way of measuring your vitamin D level is to order GrassrootsHealth ’ s vitamin D testing kit .
Also , if you haven ’ t already visited www.StopCovidCold.com please do so now so you can take your free COVID risk test and also grab a free PDF copy with far better graphics than I was able to put in my recently published Nutrients paper .
Once you know your current vitamin D level , use the GrassrootsHealth vitamin D calculator48 to determine how much vitamin D @ @ @ @ @ @ @ level .
Again , to optimize vitamin D absorption and utilization , be sure to take your vitamin D with vitamin K2 and magnesium .
Lastly , remember to retest in three to four months to make sure you ’ ve reached your target level .
If you have , then you know you ’ re taking the correct dosage .
If you ’ re still low ( or have reached a level above 80 ng/mL ) , you ’ ll need to adjust your dosage accordingly and retest again in another three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Protect Against Cancer and Other Diseases According to one large-scale study , having optimal vitamin D levels can slash your risk of cancer and can help prevent at least 16 different types of cancer , including pancreatic , lung , ovarian , prostate and skin cancers .
Vitamin D from sun exposure also radically decreases your risk of autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis ( MS ) and Type 1 diabetes .
Sun exposure also helps prevent osteoporosis , which is a significant concern for women in particular .
Magnesium Is Necessary to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population does not get enough magnesium and far more are likely deficient , magnesium supplementation is recommended when taking vitamin D supplements .
This is because magnesium helps to activate vitamin D , as the enzymes that metabolize vitamin D in your liver and kidneys require magnesium .
What GrassrootsHealth observed in testing and analyzing nutrient intakes from over 15,000 patients is that about half of those taking vitamin D supplements were unable to normalize their vitamin D levels until they started to take supplemental magnesium .
They also found that those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on average , 146 % more vitamin D per day to achieve a healthy blood level of 40 ng/ml ( 100 nmol/L ) , compared to those who take at least 400 mg of magnesium along with their vitamin D supplement .
Omega-3 Fats Are Crucial to Your Well-Being Meanwhile , recent research suggests high doses ( 4 grams ) of the omega-3 fats EPA and DHA may help improve healing after a heart attack .
Other benefits of omega-3 fats include prevention of lupus and Parkinson ’ s disease , decreased anxiety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as fighting fats in the body .
However , you can ’ t tell by looking in a mirror if you are deficient in vitamin D , magnesium or omega-3s .
The only real way to know if you are deficient in these nutrients is to get tested .
How Much Vitamin D Should You Take If you know your vitamin D level you can use the calculator below to find the best dose to take .
The Best of Joseph Mercola

Aside from insulin resistance, discussed in “The Real Pandemic Is Insulin Resistance,” vitamin D deficiency has emerged as a primary risk factor for severe COVID-19 infection and death. Higher vitamin D levels have even been shown to lower your risk of testing positive for the virus in the first place.
Getting the word out about this — especially to the Black community and the elderly in nursing homes — could have a significant impact on future hospitalization and death rates from this virus.
If you have a loved one in a nursing home, taking the time to talk to the medical management about vitamin D testing and supplementation could also make a big difference in the general health of all the residents, as vitamin D is something that can strengthen your immune system in a matter of a few weeks and has many health benefits beside lowering your risk of viral illness.
Vast Majority of COVID-19 Patients Have Vitamin D Deficiency
The Optimal Dose: Rest... Judson Somerville MD Best Price: $9.96 Buy New $9.98 (as of 06:05 UTC - Details) According to a Spanish study1,2,3 published online October 27, 2020, in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 82.2% of COVID-19 patients tested were found to be deficient in vitamin D, the medical term for which is 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25OHD).
The researchers compared the vitamin D levels of 216 COVID-19 patients and 197 population-based controls, finding that hospitalized COVID-19 patients had a higher prevalence of deficiency and had lower vitamin D levels overall. As reported by the authors:4
“In COVID-19 patients, mean± SD 25OHD levels were 13.8±7.2 ng/ml, compared to 20.9 ±7.4 ng/ml in controls. 25OHD values were lower in men than in women. Vitamin D deficiency was found in 82.2% of COVID-19 cases and 47.2% of population-based controls.
25OHD inversely correlate to serum ferritin and D-dimer levels. Vitamin D deficient COVID-19 patients had a greater prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases, raised serum ferritin and troponin levels, as well as a longer length of hospital stay than those with serum 25 OHD levels ≥ 20 ng/ml.”
While this particular study failed to find a correlation between vitamin D levels and disease severity, other studies have shown patients with higher levels do tend to have milder disease. In fact, one such study5,6 found your risk of developing a severe case of, and dying from, COVID-19 virtually disappears once your vitamin D level gets above 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L).
Vitamin D’s Impact on COVID-19
Back in June 2020, I launched an information campaign about vitamin D that included the release of a downloadable scientific report. This report, as well as a two-minute COVID risk quiz is available on StopCovidCold.com.
October 31, 2020, my review paper7 “Evidence Regarding Vitamin D and Risk of COVID-19 and Its Severity,” co-written with William Grant, Ph.D., and Dr. Carol Wagner, both of whom are part of the GrassrootsHealth expert vitamin D panel, was also published in the peer-reviewed journal Nutrients. You can read the paper for free on the journal’s website. It will be officially published later this month. NatureWise Vitamin D3 ... Buy New $10.99 ($0.12 / Count) (as of 03:15 UTC - Details)
As noted in that paper, dark skin color, increased age, pre-existing chronic conditions and vitamin D deficiency are all features of severe COVID disease, and of these, vitamin D deficiency is the only factor that is modifiable. As such, it would be foolish to ignore, especially since vitamin D supplements are readily available and low cost.
Vitamin D can reduce your risk of COVID-19 and other respiratory infections via several different mechanisms, including but not limited to the following, all of which are discussed in greater detail in our paper:8
Reducing the survival and replication of viruses 9
Reducing inflammatory cytokine production
Maintaining endothelial integrity (Endothelial dysfunction contributes to vascular inflammation and impaired blood clotting, two hallmarks of severe COVID-19)
Increasing angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) concentrations. As explained in our paper:
“Angiotensin II is a natural peptide hormone best known for increasing blood pressure through stimulating aldosterone. ACE2 normally consumes angiotensin I, thereby lowering its concentrations. However, SARS-CoV-2 infection downregulates ACE2, leading to excessive accumulation of angiotensin II.
Cell cultures of human alveolar type II cells with vitamin D have shown that the SARS-CoV-2 virus interacts with the ACE2 receptor expressed on the surface of lung epithelial cells. Once the virus binds to the ACE2 receptor, it reduces its activity and, in turn, promotes ACE1 activity, forming more angiotensin II, which increases the severity of COVID-19.”
Vitamin D also boosts your overall immune function by modulating your innate and adaptive immune responses, reduces respiratory distress10 and improves overall lung function, helps produce surfactants in your lungs that aid in fluid clearance.11
Dr. Amy Myers Vitamin ... Buy New $31.97 ($0.53 / Count) (as of 06:15 UTC - Details) It lowers your risk of comorbidities associated with poor COVID-19 prognosis, including obesity,12 Type 2 diabetes,13 high blood pressure14 and heart disease.15 All of these factors make it an important component of COVID-19 prevention and treatment.
Criteria for Causality Satisfied
As of September 27, 2020, the data from 14 observational studies — summarized in Table 1 of our paper16 — suggest that vitamin D blood levels are inversely correlated with the incidence and/or severity of COVID-19, and the evidence currently available generally satisfies Hill’s criteria for causality in a biological system, which include:17
Strength of association
Temporality
Plausibility (e.g., mechanisms)
Consistency of evidence
Biological gradient
Coherence (although it still needs to be verified experimentally)
COVID-19 Features Related to Vitamin D Status
In our paper,18 we review several features of COVID-19 that are indicative of vitamin D deficiency. For starters, SARS-CoV-2 emerged in the winter in the northern hemisphere, and as we moved into summer, positive tests, hospitalizations and death rates fell. So, generally, COVID-19 prevalence has been inversely correlated with solar UVB doses and vitamin D production.
Secondly, people with darker skin have higher COVID-19 case and death rates than Caucasians. Vitamin D is produced in your skin in response to sun exposure, but the darker your skin, the more sun exposure you need in order to maintain an optimal vitamin D level. Nature Made Extra Stre... Buy New $14.72 ($0.08 / Count) (as of 01:10 UTC - Details)
While a light-skinned individual may need only 10 to 15 minutes a day, a person with very dark skin may need upward of 1.5 hours. As a result, vitamin D deficiency tends to be far higher among Blacks and dark-skinned Hispanics.
SARS-CoV-2 positivity is strongly and inversely associated with circulating 25(OH)D levels, a relationship that persists across latitudes, races/ethnicities, both sexes, and age ranges. ~ PLOS ONE September 17, 2020
Thirdly, one of the lethal hallmarks of COVID-19 is the cytokine storm that can develop in severe cases, which manifests as hyperinflammation and tissue damage. Vitamin D is known to regulate inflammatory cytokine production, thereby lowering this risk. Lastly, vitamin D is an important regulator of your immune system, and dysregulation of the immune system is a hallmark of severe COVID-19.
Findings From Largest Study to Date
The largest observational study19 to date was published in the journal PLOS ONE, September 17, 2020. It looked at data for 191,779 American patients with a mean age of 50 who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between March and June 2020 and had had their vitamin D tested sometime in the preceding 12 months. It found:
12.5% of patients who had a vitamin D level below 20 ng/ml (deficiency) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2
8.1% of those who had a vitamin D level between 30 and 34 ng/ml (adequacy) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2
Only 5.9% of those who had an optimal vitamin D level of 55 ng/ml or higher tested positive for SARS-CoV-2
According to the authors:20
“SARS-CoV-2 positivity is strongly and inversely associated with circulating 25(OH)D levels, a relationship that persists across latitudes, races/ethnicities, both sexes, and age ranges. Our findings provide impetus to explore the role of vitamin D supplementation in reducing the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease.”
Nature Made Vitamin D3... Buy New $10.49 ($0.03 / Count) (as of 06:15 UTC - Details) This inverse relationship between vitamin D and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates may be due to the fact that vitamin D reduces survival and replication of the virus by activating immune cells to produce the antimicrobial and antiviral peptides cathelicidin and defensins, and increasing concentrations of free ACE2, which prevents the virus from entering cells via the ACE2 receptor.21
Higher Vitamin D Lowers All Risks Associated With COVID-19
The argument for vitamin D optimization is strengthened by the fact that higher levels not only reduce your risk of testing positive for the virus but also cut the risk of severe illness, the need for hospitalization and mechanical ventilation, the length of hospitalization, and death. Examples of this include the following studies, which show vitamin D:
•Lowers infection rates — In the PLOS ONE study22 above, people with a vitamin D level of at least 55 ng/mL (138 nmol/L) had a 47% lower SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate compared to those with a level below 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L). Even after adjustment for gender, age, ethnicity and latitude, the risk of having a positive test result was 43% lower among those with a vitamin D level of 55 ng/mL compared to those with a level of 20 ng/mL.
This was also confirmed in an Israeli population-based study23,24 published in July 2020. Here, those with a vitamin D level above 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) had a 59% lower risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to those with a vitamin D level between 20 ng/mL and 29 ng/mL (50 to 74 nmol/L), and a 58% lower risk compared to those with a vitamin D level below 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L).
•Lowers hospitalization rates — The Israeli analysis25 above also found that among individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, those who had a vitamin D level below 30 ng/mL had a 1.95 times (crude odds ratio) to 2.09 times (odds ratio after adjustment for demographics and psychiatric and somatic disorders) higher risk of being hospitalized for COVID-19.
In other words, having a vitamin D level below 30 ng/mL about doubled the risk of being hospitalized with COVID-19.
•Lowers need for intensive care — Vitamin D, when administered to hospitalized patients, can also lower their risk of needing intensive care. This was demonstrated by Spanish researchers in a small randomized clinical study26,27,28,29 published online August 29, 2020.
Hospitalized COVID-19 patients given supplemental calcifediol (a vitamin D3 analog) in addition to standard of care — which included the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin — had significantly lower intensive care unit admissions. Vitafusion Organic D3 ... Buy New $9.92 ($0.11 / Count) (as of 06:15 UTC - Details)
Patients in the vitamin D arm received 532 micrograms of calcifediol on the day of admission (equivalent to 106,400 IUs of vitamin D30) followed by 266 mcg on Days 3 and 7 (equivalent to 53,200 IUs31). After that, they received 266 mcg once a week until discharge, ICU admission or death.
Of those receiving calcifediol, only 2% required ICU admission, compared to 50% of those who did not get calcifediol. None of those given vitamin D supplementation died, compared to 7.6% of those in the standard care group.
•Reduces severity of COVID-19 — An August 2020 study32,33 published in the journal Nutrients found patients who had a vitamin D level below 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L) had a 6.12 times higher risk of severe disease requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
Studies have also shown vitamin D deficiency is a common factor among hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 related respiratory failure. One such study34 found 81% of the patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 had vitamin D levels below 30 ng/ml (75 nmol/L); 24% had severe vitamin D deficiency (≤10 ng/ml or ≤25 nmol/L).
•Reduces mortality — The Nutrients study35,36 above also found having a vitamin D level below 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L) raised the risk of death by 14.7 times, compared to having a vitamin D level above 12 ng/mL.
Similarly, researchers in Indonesia found37 those with a vitamin D level between 21 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) and 29 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) had a 12.55 times higher risk of death than those with a level above 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L), and having a level below 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) was associated with a 19.12 times higher risk of death.
In an Iranian study,38,39 among COVID-19 patients over the age of 40 who had vitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L), 20% died, compared to 9.7% of those with levels at or above 30 ng/mL. Among those with a vitamin D level of at least 40 ng/mL (100 nmol/L), only 6.3% died.
The Role of Magnesium and Vitamin K2
Healthy in Seven Days:... Helden, Raimund von Best Price: $14.69 Buy New $14.88 (as of 06:15 UTC - Details) While regular sun exposure is the ideal way to optimize your vitamin D level, this can be nearly impossible during the winter. For this reason, an oral vitamin D3 supplement is recommended for most people. However, when supplementing you also need to be mindful of other nutrients that have synergistic effects.
One of them is magnesium, which is required for the conversion of vitamin D into its active form. Without sufficient amounts of magnesium, your body cannot properly utilize the vitamin D you’re taking.40,41,42,43
According to a scientific review44,45 published in 2018, as many as 50% of Americans taking vitamin D supplements may not get significant benefit as the vitamin D simply gets stored in its inactive form, and the reason for this is because they have insufficient magnesium levels. Research46 published in 2013 also highlighted this issue, concluding that higher magnesium intake helps reduce your risk of vitamin D deficiency by activating more of it.
Another cofactor is vitamin K2, as it helps prevent complications associated with excessive calcification in your arteries. In fact, relative vitamin K2 deficiency is typically what produces symptoms of “vitamin D toxicity.”
Research by GrassrootsHealth, based on data from nearly 3,000 individuals, reveals you need 244% more oral vitamin D if you’re not also taking magnesium and vitamin K2.47 What this means in practical terms is that if you take all three supplements in combination, you need far less oral vitamin D in order to achieve a healthy vitamin D level.
Take-Home Message
If you live in the northern hemisphere, which is currently heading toward winter, now is the time to check your vitamin D level and start taking action to raise it if you’re below 40 ng/mL (100 nmol/L). Experts recommend a vitamin D level between 40 and 60 ng/mL (100 to 150 nmol/L).
An easy and cost-effective way of measuring your vitamin D level is to order GrassrootsHealth’s vitamin D testing kit. Also, if you haven’t already visited www.StopCovidCold.com please do so now so you can take your free COVID risk test and also grab a free PDF copy with far better graphics than I was able to put in my recently published Nutrients paper.
Once you know your current vitamin D level, use the GrassrootsHealth vitamin D calculator48 to determine how much vitamin D you might need to reach your target level. Again, to optimize vitamin D absorption and utilization, be sure to take your vitamin D with vitamin K2 and magnesium.
Lastly, remember to retest in three to four months to make sure you’ve reached your target level. If you have, then you know you’re taking the correct dosage. If you’re still low (or have reached a level above 80 ng/mL), you’ll need to adjust your dosage accordingly and retest again in another three to four months.
Vitamin D Helps Protect Against Cancer and Other Diseases
According to one large-scale study, having optimal vitamin D levels can slash your risk of cancer and can help prevent at least 16 different types of cancer, including pancreatic, lung, ovarian, prostate and skin cancers.
Vitamin D from sun exposure also radically decreases your risk of autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and Type 1 diabetes. Sun exposure also helps prevent osteoporosis, which is a significant concern for women in particular.
Magnesium Is Necessary to Activate Vitamin D
Since over half the population does not get enough magnesium and far more are likely deficient, magnesium supplementation is recommended when taking vitamin D supplements. This is because magnesium helps to activate vitamin D, as the enzymes that metabolize vitamin D in your liver and kidneys require magnesium.
What GrassrootsHealth observed in testing and analyzing nutrient intakes from over 15,000 patients is that about half of those taking vitamin D supplements were unable to normalize their vitamin D levels until they started to take supplemental magnesium.
They also found that those who do not take supplemental magnesium need, on average, 146% more vitamin D per day to achieve a healthy blood level of 40 ng/ml (100 nmol/L), compared to those who take at least 400 mg of magnesium along with their vitamin D supplement.
Omega-3 Fats Are Crucial to Your Well-Being
Meanwhile, recent research suggests high doses (4 grams) of the omega-3 fats EPA and DHA may help improve healing after a heart attack. Other benefits of omega-3 fats include prevention of lupus and Parkinson’s disease, decreased anxiety, healthier and stronger bones, as well as fighting fats in the body.
However, you can’t tell by looking in a mirror if you are deficient in vitamin D, magnesium or omega-3s. The only real way to know if you are deficient in these nutrients is to get tested.
How Much Vitamin D Should You Take
If you know your vitamin D level you can use the calculator below to find the best dose to take.
Sources and References
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola


lewrockwell--2020-11-12--Why Scott Adams of Dilbert Fame And I Say Trump Wins This Thing – Bigly

Ok , sit back from your sleepless nights and fury every time you turn on Fox News and put down the Chardonnay and take a long , deep breath .
Please !
On Monday , Scott Adams of Dilbert fame , who is one of the finest critical minds in the podcast world quoted AmericanThinker.com ’ s article that said Trump was probably going to win this thing .
Scott Adams agreed !
Scott Adams says Trump is right now a 60 % favorite to win this thing .
Scott and I are probably the only two people on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this right now .
Let ’ s go there for a moment .
Calm down !
Again .
Calm down !
Biden is at 290 Electoral votes ; awarded by the mainstream media .
Nothing is truly awarded until the state legislatures do so in mid-December , so chill .
However , the mainstream media is screwing with your heads by calling this election because they hate the guy who called them FAKE NEWS .
Talking Trump Birthday ... Best Price : $ 7.13 Buy New $ 7.95 And you are letting them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 270 Electoral votes or more to come out of the basement and become the first chief executive of the most powerful force on the planet with early stage dementia .
It is a civil rights thing so deal with it .
If you think that is wrong , you are a racist .
The 290 Electoral vote total includes 20 from Pennsylvania .
There is a ton of fraud in that state and you are seeing all kinds of reports of ballots coming in at 4:00 AM and all that .
Skip it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people on the Justice Alito Supreme Court Order .
Justice Alito , not a man with whom to trifle , is in charge of day-to-day activities for a group of states and Pennsylvania is one of them .
The Justice told Pennsylvania to “ segregate ” any vote that came in after 8:00 PM on election night .
You will recall , DJ was winning bigly ( a Scott Adams word ) at that point .
Around midnight , Texas time , the Pennsylvania vote counters stopped counting .
Then the truckloads of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Biden and no other candidate for any lower office .
The Supreme Court ruled , sort of , in this case already .
They said , with 4 Justices led by Justice Alito that ONLY the Pennsylvania legislature can make or modify voting rules .
Read the opinions – this thing is NOT going to go to Biden .
It is black and white , in the United States Constitution , a dusty document tourists see in the National Archives in DC .

Ok, sit back from your sleepless nights and fury every time you turn on Fox News and put down the Chardonnay and take a long, deep breath. Please!
On Monday, Scott Adams of Dilbert fame, who is one of the finest critical minds in the podcast world quoted AmericanThinker.com’s article that said Trump was probably going to win this thing. Scott Adams agreed!
Scott Adams says Trump is right now a 60% favorite to win this thing.
Scott and I are probably the only two people on the planet, other than DJ himself thinking this right now. Let’s go there for a moment. Calm down! Again. Calm down!
Biden is at 290 Electoral votes; awarded by the mainstream media. Nothing is truly awarded until the state legislatures do so in mid-December, so chill. However, the mainstream media is screwing with your heads by calling this election because they hate the guy who called them FAKE NEWS. Talking Trump Birthday... Best Price: $7.13 Buy New $7.95 (as of 08:29 UTC - Details)
And you are letting them do it. Stop!
Let’s do some arithmetic.
Biden needs 270 Electoral votes or more to come out of the basement and become the first chief executive of the most powerful force on the planet with early stage dementia. It is a civil rights thing so deal with it. If you think that is wrong, you are a racist.
The 290 Electoral vote total includes 20 from Pennsylvania. There is a ton of fraud in that state and you are seeing all kinds of reports of ballots coming in at 4:00 AM and all that. Skip it. That does not matter.
Focus people on the Justice Alito Supreme Court Order. Justice Alito, not a man with whom to trifle, is in charge of day-to-day activities for a group of states and Pennsylvania is one of them. The Justice told Pennsylvania to “segregate” any vote that came in after 8:00 PM on election night. You will recall, DJ was winning bigly (a Scott Adams word) at that point.
Around midnight, Texas time, the Pennsylvania vote counters stopped counting. Then the truckloads of new ballots came in, reportedly voting for Biden and no other candidate for any lower office.
The Supreme Court ruled, sort of, in this case already. They said, with 4 Justices led by Justice Alito that ONLY the Pennsylvania legislature can make or modify voting rules. Read the opinions – this thing is NOT going to go to Biden.
It is black and white, in the United States Constitution, a dusty document tourists see in the National Archives in DC.
Read the Whole Article


lewrockwell--2020-11-12--Covid Vaccine Revelation Sinks Like a Stone; Disappears

In major media , certain stories gain traction .
The trumpets keep blaring for a time before they fade .
Other stories are one-offs .
A few of them strike hard .
Their implications—if anyone stops to think about them—are powerful .
Then…nothing .
“ Wait , aren ’ t you going to follow up on that ?
Don ’ t you see what that MEANS ?
” Apparently not , because…dead silence .
“ In other news , the governor lost his pet parakeet for an hour .
His chief of staff found it taking a nap in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
You definitely want to know more , but you never get more .
Plandemic : Exposing th ... Fife , Dr. Bruce Buy New $ 8.95 Over the years , I ’ ve tried to follow up on a few .
The reporter or the editor has a set of standard replies : “ We didn ’ t get much feedback.
” “ We covered it.
” “ It ’ s now old news.
” “ There wasn ’ t anything else to find out.
” Oh , but there WAS .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a one-off .
The analysis and commentary were mine , but the story was an opinion piece in the New York Times .
The Times called it an opinion piece to soften its blow .
I suspected it would disappear , and it did .
Its meaning and implication were too strong .
It would be a vast embarrassment for the White House , the Warp Speed COVID vaccine program , the vaccine manufacturers , the coronavirus task force , and vaccine researchers .
And embarrassment would be just the beginning of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The vanished one-off , back in business : COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail ; fatal design flaw ; NY Times opinion piece exposes all three major clinical trials .
[ 2 ] Peter Doshi , associate editor of the medical journal BMJ , and Eric Topol , Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine , have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials .
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer , AstraZeneca , and Moderna trials .
The Price of Panic : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New $ 28.99 September 22 , the Times : “ These Coronavirus Trials Don ’ t Answer the One Question We Need to Know ” [ 1 ] : “ If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine , would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19 , or one that would prevent its serious complications ?
” “ The answer is obvious .
You would want to protect against the worst cases.
” “ But that ’ s not how the companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidates , Moderna , Pfizer and AstraZeneca , whose U.S. trial is on hold , are approaching the problem.
” “ According to the protocols for their studies , which they released late last week , a vaccine could meet the companies ’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19 , but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease , or the risk of hospitalization , admissions to the intensive care unit or death.
” “ To say a vaccine works should mean that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of getting seriously sick .
That ’ s not what these trials will determine.
” This means these clinical trials are dead in the water .
The trials are designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID , which nobody should care about , because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm .
THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES .
There .
That ’ s the NY Times one-off .
My piece analyzing it went on much longer , but you get the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ... Ortleb , Charles Buy New $ 25.00 The leading vaccine clinical trials are useless , irrelevant , misleading , and deceptive .
But now , it gets much worse .
Because Pfizer has just announced their vaccine is almost ready .
CNBC headline , November 9 : “ Pfizer , BioNTech say Covid vaccine is more than 90 % effective— ‘ great day for science and humanity ’ ” [ 3 ] .
And not a peep about the NY Times one-off .
That ’ s gone , as if it never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ force knows the truth .
Biden ’ s new task force , waiting in the wings , knows the truth .
But they don ’ t care .
They ’ re criminals .
They ’ d sell a car with a gas tank ready to explode to a customer with cash .
But you care , because you can read and think .
Now , in case anyone is interested in knowing WHY the major clinical trials of the COVID vaccine are designed only to prevent mild cases of COVID , I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that , during the course of the clinical trial , a few of the 30,000 volunteers are going to “ catch COVID-19.
” They assume this because “ the virus is everywhere , ” as far as they ’ re concerned .
So it ’ ll drop down from the clouds and infect a few of the volunteers .
The magic number is 150 .
When that number of volunteers “ catch COVID , ” everything stops .
The clinical trial stops .
Fauci : The Bernie Mado ... Ortleb , Charles Buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine maker hopes that most of the volunteers who “ got infected ” are in the placebo group .
They didn ’ t receive the real vaccine ; they received the saltwater placebo shot .
Then the vaccine maker can proudly say , “ See ?
The volunteers who caught COVID-19 ?
Most of them didn ’ t receive the vaccine .
They weren ’ t protected .
The volunteers who received the real vaccine didn ’ t catch COVID .
The vaccine protected them.
” Actually , the number split the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 100 .
If 50 people in the vaccine group catch COVID , and 100 in the placebo group catch COVID , the vaccine is said to be 50 % effective .
And that ’ s all the vaccine maker needs to win FDA approval for the vaccine .
But wait .
Let ’ s look closer at this idea of “ catching COVID.
” What are they really talking about ?
How do they define that ?
Claiming a volunteer in the clinical trial caught COVID adds up to what ?
Does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of COVID-19—a cough , or chills and fever ?
Or does it mean a serious case—severe pneumonia ?
Now we come to the hidden factor , the secret , the source of the whole con game .
You see , the vaccine maker starts out with 30,000 HEALTHY volunteers .
So , if they waited for 150 of them to come down with severe pneumonia , a serious case of COVID , how long do you think that would take ?
Five years ?
Ten years ?
These 150 COVID cases the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Just a cough .
Or chills and fever .
That scenario would only take a few months to develop .
And face it , chills , cough , and fever aren ’ t unique to COVID .
Anyone can come down with those symptoms .
A VOYAGE IN IMAGINATIO ... Holmes , Dr Joel S Buy New $ 9.95 THEREFORE , THE WHOLE CLINICAL TRIAL IS DESIGNED , UP FRONT , TO FIND 150 CASES OF MILD AND MEANINGLESS AND SELF-CURING “ COVID.
” About which , no one cares .
No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we see , Pfizer is trumpeting their clinical trial of the vaccine as a landmark in human history .
And THAT ’ S the story of the one-off the NY Times didn ’ t think was worth a second glance .
Because they ’ re so stupid ?
No .
They ’ re not that stupid .
And the government wants you to take the experimental COVID vaccine , whose “ effectiveness ” was designed to prevent nothing worth losing a night ’ s sleep over .
The only worry are the adverse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ve written extensively .
These effects include , depending on what ’ s in the vial , a permanent alteration of your genetic makeup , or an auto-immune cascade , in which the body attacks itself .
The Best of Jon Rappoport

In major media, certain stories gain traction. The trumpets keep blaring for a time before they fade.
Other stories are one-offs. A few of them strike hard. Their implications—if anyone stops to think about them—are powerful. Then…nothing.
“Wait, aren’t you going to follow up on that? Don’t you see what that MEANS?”
Apparently not, because…dead silence. “In other news, the governor lost his pet parakeet for an hour. His chief of staff found it taking a nap in a desk drawer…”
One-offs function like teasers. You definitely want to know more, but you never get more. Plandemic: Exposing th... Fife, Dr. Bruce Buy New $8.95 (as of 02:15 UTC - Details)
Over the years, I’ve tried to follow up on a few. The reporter or the editor has a set of standard replies: “We didn’t get much feedback.” “We covered it.” “It’s now old news.” “There wasn’t anything else to find out.”
Oh, but there WAS.
A few weeks ago, I ran a one-off. The analysis and commentary were mine, but the story was an opinion piece in the New York Times. The Times called it an opinion piece to soften its blow. I suspected it would disappear, and it did.
Its meaning and implication were too strong. It would be a vast embarrassment for the White House, the Warp Speed COVID vaccine program, the vaccine manufacturers, the coronavirus task force, and vaccine researchers.
And embarrassment would be just the beginning of their problem.
So…here it is again. The vanished one-off, back in business:
COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail; fatal design flaw; NY Times opinion piece exposes all three major clinical trials. [2]
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.
They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials. The Price of Panic: Ho... Axe Ph.D., Douglas Buy New $28.99 (as of 05:16 UTC - Details)
September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know” [1]:
“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”
“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”
“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”
“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”
“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”
This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
The trials are designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID, which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.
There. That’s the NY Times one-off. My piece analyzing it went on much longer, but you get the main thrust: The Chronic Fatigue Sy... Ortleb, Charles Buy New $25.00 (as of 05:11 UTC - Details)
The leading vaccine clinical trials are useless, irrelevant, misleading, and deceptive.
But now, it gets much worse. Because Pfizer has just announced their vaccine is almost ready. CNBC headline, November 9: “Pfizer, BioNTech say Covid vaccine is more than 90% effective—‘great day for science and humanity’” [3].
And not a peep about the NY Times one-off. That’s gone, as if it never was.
Trump’s coronavirus task force knows the truth. Biden’s new task force, waiting in the wings, knows the truth. But they don’t care. They’re criminals. They’d sell a car with a gas tank ready to explode to a customer with cash.
But you care, because you can read and think.
You can raise hell.
Now, in case anyone is interested in knowing WHY the major clinical trials of the COVID vaccine are designed only to prevent mild cases of COVID, I’ll explain.
A vaccine maker assumes that, during the course of the clinical trial, a few of the 30,000 volunteers are going to “catch COVID-19.”
They assume this because “the virus is everywhere,” as far as they’re concerned. So it’ll drop down from the clouds and infect a few of the volunteers.
The magic number is 150. When that number of volunteers “catch COVID,” everything stops. The clinical trial stops. Fauci: The Bernie Mado... Ortleb, Charles Buy New $5.99 (as of 02:55 UTC - Details)
At this point, the vaccine maker hopes that most of the volunteers who “got infected” are in the placebo group. They didn’t receive the real vaccine; they received the saltwater placebo shot.
Then the vaccine maker can proudly say, “See? The volunteers who caught COVID-19? Most of them didn’t receive the vaccine. They weren’t protected. The volunteers who received the real vaccine didn’t catch COVID. The vaccine protected them.”
Actually, the number split the vaccine makers are looking for is 50 and 100. If 50 people in the vaccine group catch COVID, and 100 in the placebo group catch COVID, the vaccine is said to be 50% effective. And that’s all the vaccine maker needs to win FDA approval for the vaccine.
But wait. Let’s look closer at this idea of “catching COVID.” What are they really talking about? How do they define that? Claiming a volunteer in the clinical trial caught COVID adds up to what?
Does it add up to a minimal definition of COVID-19—a cough, or chills and fever? Or does it mean a serious case—severe pneumonia?
Now we come to the hidden factor, the secret, the source of the whole con game.
You see, the vaccine maker starts out with 30,000 HEALTHY volunteers. So, if they waited for 150 of them to come down with severe pneumonia, a serious case of COVID, how long do you think that would take? Five years? Ten years?
The vaccine maker can’t possibly wait that long.
These 150 COVID cases the vaccine maker is looking for would be mild. Just a cough. Or chills and fever. That scenario would only take a few months to develop. And face it, chills, cough, and fever aren’t unique to COVID. Anyone can come down with those symptoms. A VOYAGE IN IMAGINATIO... Holmes, Dr Joel S Buy New $9.95 (as of 04:21 UTC - Details)
THEREFORE, THE WHOLE CLINICAL TRIAL IS DESIGNED, UP FRONT, TO FIND 150 CASES OF MILD AND MEANINGLESS AND SELF-CURING “COVID.”
About which, no one cares. No one should care.
But, as we see, Pfizer is trumpeting their clinical trial of the vaccine as a landmark in human history.
And THAT’S the story of the one-off the NY Times didn’t think was worth a second glance.
Because they’re so stupid? No. They’re not that stupid.
They’re criminals.
And the government wants you to take the experimental COVID vaccine, whose “effectiveness” was designed to prevent nothing worth losing a night’s sleep over.
The only worry are the adverse effects of the vaccine, about which I’ve written extensively. These effects include, depending on what’s in the vial, a permanent alteration of your genetic makeup, or an auto-immune cascade, in which the body attacks itself.
SOURCES:
[1] nytimes.com/2020/09/22/opinion/covid-vaccine-coronavirus.html
[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/24/covid-vaccine-clinical-trials-doomed-to-fail-fatal-design-flaw/
[3] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/covid-vaccine-pfizer-drug-is-more-than-90percent-effective-in-preventing-infection.html
Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
The Best of Jon Rappoport


lewrockwell--2020-11-12--Do We Still Have a Constitution?

Do We Still Have a Constitution?

I have been taking some heat from friends and colleagues for my steadfast defense of personal liberties and my arguments that the Constitution — when interpreted in accordance with the plain meaning of its words , and informed by history — does not permit the government to infringe upon personal freedoms , no matter the emergency or pandemic .
For those who agree with me , worry not .
We will persevere .
For those who trust the government , worry a lot .
You are not in good hands .
The purpose of the Constitution is to establish the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the limitations are written in the Constitution itself .
Most of the limitations that pertain to personal freedoms are found in the Bill of Rights — the first 10 amendments .
These amendments were ratified to restrain the federal government from infringing upon personal liberties .
Since the enactment of the 14th Amendment in 1868 , and subsequent litigation , these amendments , for the most part , restrain the states as well .
The courts have characterized these protected liberties as fundamental .
Natural Law Spooner , Lysander Buy New $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , speech , press , assembly , worship , self-defense , privacy , travel , property ownership , interstate commercial activities and fair treatment from government are plainly articulated or rationally inferred in the first eight amendments .
The Ninth is a catchall , which declares that the enumeration of rights in the first eight shall not mean that there are no other rights that are fundamental , and the government shall not disparage those other rights .
The Tenth reflects that the states have reserved powers to themselves .
The Ninth was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Madison , because of his view that natural rights — known today as fundamental rights — are integral to each person , and they are too numerous to list .
In the next century , the anti-slavery crusader Lysander Spooner would explain it thusly : “ A man ’ s natural rights are his own , against the whole world ; and any infringement of them is equally a crime , whether committed by one man , or by millions ; whether committed by one man , calling himself a robber , … @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government.
” Natural rights collectively constitute the moral ability and sovereign authority of every human being to make personal choices — free from government interference or government permission .
Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that government derives all its powers from the consent of the governed .
And Madison understood the Ninth Amendment to declare that our personal choices are insulated from government interference so long as their exercise does not impair another ’ s rights .
From this , it follows that if governments interfere with our personal choices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their power to interfere — the interference is invalid , unlawful and , because our personal choices are essentially protected from governmental interference by the Bill of Rights , unconstitutional .
Now , back to the present-day restraints during this pandemic .
The current interferences with the exercise of rights protected by the Bill of Rights devolve around travel , assembly , interstate commercial activities and the exercise of religious beliefs .
These infringements have all come from state governors who claim the power to do so , and they raise three profound @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Do governors have inherent power in an emergency to craft regulations that carry the force of law ?
The answer is no .
The Guarantee Clause of the Constitution mandates a republican ( lowercase “ r ” ) form of government in the states .
That means the separation of powers into three branches , each with a distinct function that can not constitutionally be performed by either of the other two .
Since only a representative legislature can write laws that carry criminal penalties and incur the use of force , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ write laws .
The second constitutional issue is : Can state legislatures delegate away to governors their law-making powers ?
Again , the answer is no because the separation of powers prevents one branch of government from ceding to another branch its core powers .
The separation was crafted not to preserve the integrity of each branch but to assure the preservation of personal liberty by preventing the accumulation of too much power in any one branch .
We are not talking about a state legislature delegating to a board of medical examiners @ @ @ @ @ @ @ license physicians .
We are talking about delegating away a core power — the authority to create crimes and craft punishments .
Such a delegation would be an egregious violation of the Guarantee Clause .
Suicide Pact : The Radi ... Napolitano , Andrew P. Best Price : $ 0.25 Buy New $ 2.84 The third constitutional issue is : Can a state legislature enact laws that interfere with personal liberties protected by the Bill of Rights , prescribe punishments for violations of those laws and authorize governors to use force to compel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no because all government in America is subordinate to the natural rights articulated in the Bill of Rights and embraced in the Ninth Amendment .
We should rejoice that there is resistance to gubernatorial ignorance and arrogance that disregards the Bill of Rights .
We need resistance to tyranny in order to stay free .
Power unresisted continues to grow and to corrupt .
History teaches that most people prefer the illusion of safety to the cacophony of liberty .
The only reason we have civil liberties today is because generations of determined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 1770s — have fought for them .
Today , we are governed by dangerous men and women .
For they have taken away our ability to make personal choices , and they have used force to compel compliance .
In doing that , they have not only violated their oaths to uphold the Bill of Rights , they also have committed the criminal acts of nullifying our rights .
By using the powers of state governments to do this , they have made themselves candidates for federal criminal prosecutions when saner days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Napolitano

Shop all books by Judge Napolitano
I have been taking some heat from friends and colleagues for my steadfast defense of personal liberties and my arguments that the Constitution — when interpreted in accordance with the plain meaning of its words, and informed by history — does not permit the government to infringe upon personal freedoms, no matter the emergency or pandemic. For those who agree with me, worry not. We will persevere. For those who trust the government, worry a lot. You are not in good hands.
The purpose of the Constitution is to establish the government and to limit it. Some of the limitations are written in the Constitution itself. Most of the limitations that pertain to personal freedoms are found in the Bill of Rights — the first 10 amendments.
These amendments were ratified to restrain the federal government from infringing upon personal liberties. Since the enactment of the 14th Amendment in 1868, and subsequent litigation, these amendments, for the most part, restrain the states as well. The courts have characterized these protected liberties as fundamental. Natural Law Spooner, Lysander Buy New $4.99 (as of 03:45 UTC - Details)
So, the rights to thought, speech, press, assembly, worship, self-defense, privacy, travel, property ownership, interstate commercial activities and fair treatment from government are plainly articulated or rationally inferred in the first eight amendments. The Ninth is a catchall, which declares that the enumeration of rights in the first eight shall not mean that there are no other rights that are fundamental, and the government shall not disparage those other rights. The Tenth reflects that the states have reserved powers to themselves.
The Ninth was especially important to its author, James Madison, because of his view that natural rights — known today as fundamental rights — are integral to each person, and they are too numerous to list. In the next century, the anti-slavery crusader Lysander Spooner would explain it thusly: “A man’s natural rights are his own, against the whole world; and any infringement of them is equally a crime, whether committed by one man, or by millions; whether committed by one man, calling himself a robber, … or by millions, calling themselves a government.”
Natural rights collectively constitute the moral ability and sovereign authority of every human being to make personal choices — free from government interference or government permission.
Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that government derives all its powers from the consent of the governed. And Madison understood the Ninth Amendment to declare that our personal choices are insulated from government interference so long as their exercise does not impair another’s rights.
From this, it follows that if governments interfere with our personal choices — and we have not consented to their power to interfere — the interference is invalid, unlawful and, because our personal choices are essentially protected from governmental interference by the Bill of Rights, unconstitutional.
Now, back to the present-day restraints during this pandemic.
The current interferences with the exercise of rights protected by the Bill of Rights devolve around travel, assembly, interstate commercial activities and the exercise of religious beliefs. These infringements have all come from state governors who claim the power to do so, and they raise three profound constitutional issues.
The first is: Do governors have inherent power in an emergency to craft regulations that carry the force of law? The answer is no. The Guarantee Clause of the Constitution mandates a republican (lowercase “r”) form of government in the states. That means the separation of powers into three branches, each with a distinct function that cannot constitutionally be performed by either of the other two. Since only a representative legislature can write laws that carry criminal penalties and incur the use of force, the governor of a state cannot constitutionally write laws.
The second constitutional issue is: Can state legislatures delegate away to governors their law-making powers? Again, the answer is no because the separation of powers prevents one branch of government from ceding to another branch its core powers. The separation was crafted not to preserve the integrity of each branch but to assure the preservation of personal liberty by preventing the accumulation of too much power in any one branch.
We are not talking about a state legislature delegating to a board of medical examiners in the executive branch the power to license physicians. We are talking about delegating away a core power — the authority to create crimes and craft punishments. Such a delegation would be an egregious violation of the Guarantee Clause. Suicide Pact: The Radi... Napolitano, Andrew P. Best Price: $0.25 Buy New $2.84 (as of 04:15 UTC - Details)
The third constitutional issue is: Can a state legislature enact laws that interfere with personal liberties protected by the Bill of Rights, prescribe punishments for violations of those laws and authorize governors to use force to compel compliance? Again, the answer is no because all government in America is subordinate to the natural rights articulated in the Bill of Rights and embraced in the Ninth Amendment.
We should rejoice that there is resistance to gubernatorial ignorance and arrogance that disregards the Bill of Rights. We need resistance to tyranny in order to stay free. Power unresisted continues to grow and to corrupt. History teaches that most people prefer the illusion of safety to the cacophony of liberty. The only reason we have civil liberties today is because generations of determined minorities — starting with the revolutionaries in the 1770s — have fought for them.
Today, we are governed by dangerous men and women. For they have taken away our ability to make personal choices, and they have used force to compel compliance. In doing that, they have not only violated their oaths to uphold the Bill of Rights, they also have committed the criminal acts of nullifying our rights. By using the powers of state governments to do this, they have made themselves candidates for federal criminal prosecutions when saner days return.
Reprinted with the author’s permission.
The Best of Andrew P. Napolitano


lewrockwell--2020-11-12--The Mother of All Elections

The Mother of All Elections

Those of us who are awake expected something like this .
Perhaps not quite so blatant or heavy handed .
But the in-your-face , Mafia-style voter fraud that has permeated the 2020 presidential election surprised even the most hardened critics of our crumbling country .
When I ended my appearance at 11 pm eastern time on Jeff Rense ’ s show on election night , Donald Trump was comfortably ahead in all the key states he needed to win , with a very high percentage of the vote counted .
It was exceedingly strange how the networks refused to call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states with lower percentages of the vote counted , and a smaller lead for Biden , in the former vice-president ’ s column .
The first sign something was amiss , other than the inconsistent state projections for the two candidates by all the networks , was the fact that late on election night , the vote counting just appeared to stop in all the crucial states .
When it finally resumed the following day , virtually every new “ drop ” of votes seemed to be overwhelmingly in favor of Biden .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pennsylvania with 80 % of the vote counted .
Biden made all that up and more , a seemingly statistical impossibility .
States like Nevada just announced they would not be counting one day at all , to resume the next .
Alleghany County in Pennsylvania declared that they couldn ’ t count on one particular day , due to “ administrative work , ” which apparently held priority over the vote .
Hidden History : An Exp ... Donald Jeffries Best Price : $ 9.86 Buy New $ 14.70 Boxes of ballots- @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 200,000 , in states like Michigan and Pennsylvania- arrived in the middle of the night .
No one asked how that many votes were boxed together at some other site- were they all mailed in at the same time from somewhere ?
The first-hand testimony of postal workers and precinct volunteers , who witnessed suspicious activity , was dismissed like all those “ mistaken ” JFK assassination witnesses have been over the years .
The mantra of “ there ’ s no evidence !
” was shouted by every “ journalist ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same highly-paid mouthpieces for the state who insist there is “ no evidence ” of conspiracy or corruption anywhere .
The social media monopolies made a preemptive strike against troublesome videos and interviews questioning the fraud to come , when they banned over twenty of the most popular alternative You Tube channels , including many that had interviewed me countless times , a few weeks before the election .
Once the election had been rigged , Twitter censored any references to fraud , even by the president of the United States .
On @ @ @ @ @ @ @ squelched by those mysterious “ fact checkers ” that are trotted out like an on-call Snopes unit .
The dead vote was evidently even more important in this election than it usually is .
“ Landslide ” Lyndon Johnson first made the dead vote significant , during the corrupt 1948 U.S. Senate runoff election .
The Trump campaign claims 10,000 dead people voted in Clark County , Nevada alone .
Citizen journalists have found numerous 2020 voters who were born in the early 1900s or even nineteenth century .
I talked to one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1800. Who voted in this election .
What a sturdy soul !
Electoral fraud is nothing new in this country .
Most Americans , even with their incredibly short memories , remember the “ hanging chads ” 2000 fiasco .
Ironically , those blasting Trump for refusing to concede a week later , fail to note that the 2000 election hung in the balance for 37 days , until Bush was finally just installed as president by the Supreme Court .
And now , new leftist hero Dubya , a vocal supporter of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accept the results and stop alleging fraud .
Crimes and Cover-ups i ... Donald Jeffries Best Price : $ 17.17 Buy New $ 17.19 The entire establishment , from the deluded , largely unemployed contingent in Hollywood , to the professional “ journalists ” who are paid not to investigate or ask pertinent questions , to the politicians in both parties who benefit from the same rigged process , is dismissing any notion of fraud .
The same establishment , of course , took seriously the fairy tale that “ Russia ” interfered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the glory of a Hillary Clinton presidency .
They will defend the narrative , and conclude there is “ no evidence ” regardless .
That ’ s part of their job .
The prime time lineup of Fox News ; Tucker Carlson , Sean Hannity , and Laura Ingraham , are covering the allegations of voting fraud in depth .
This is the first time a demonized “ conspiracy theory ” is being given credence by any mainstream media outlet .
Millions of people will view the evidence , and the guests who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theorists ” have always been denied .
This is a pleasant and surprising development .
Whether Donald Trump and his team will stay strong , and ignore the predictable cucked advice of the Mitt Romneys , remains to be seen .
His own son–in-law , who disagrees with every bit of his rhetoric , is said to be pressuring him to fold .
Trump hasn ’ t inspired confidence in this regard ; if the past four years are any indication , he will ultimately capitulate , after a firestorm of tweets promising @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Famer William Barr really honestly investigate this ?
This is the same “ swamp drainer ” who declined to prosecute the Queen of Corruption , Hillary Clinton , so color me skeptical .
Never Trumpers remain ensconced atop both the FBI and CIA , although Trump has apparently fired his anti-Trump Secretary of Defense .
His press secretary , Kayleigh McEnany boldly spoke out at a White House press briefing , but Neil Cavuto of Fox News just cut her off , declaring , “ She ’ s charging the other side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Unless she has more details to back that up , I can ’ t in good countenance continue to show you this.
” Every pillar of the rotting establishment has a vested interest in concealing the extent of the corruption .
Exposing our Banana Republic electoral process for what it is ; with its dead voters , mail-in ballots without postmarks or signatures , blocked access to oversight , incredibly biased media projections , social media censorship , and much more , could unravel the whole mess .
Once the first domino @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bullyocracy : How the S ... Jeffries , Donald Best Price : $ 15.55 Buy New $ 14.00 But such a revelation requires at least one part of the state to accept , or even acknowledge it .
Would that be our horrific , politicized courts ?
Our toothless state-run media ?
Our political “ representatives ?
” The One Percenters who run the corporate world ?
Not a likely candidate in that bunch .
Someone powerful enough to make a difference would have to outraged by the fraud .
Who would that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American simply can not or will not confront the extent of the corruption .
They will not believe until a suitable authority verifies what the “ conspiracy theorists ” are saying .
The “ woke ” Left will never accept that this particular fraud is real , because that would mean they aren ’ t rid of the Giant Orange Man .
But for now , the spectacle is entertaining .
Donald Trump threatening lawsuits , alleging widespread wrongdoing , and predicting victory .
His many enemies growing angrier and angrier that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few shows on Fox News airing sympathetic reports on the fraud allegations .
This promises to be a cliffhanger ending .
Will Trump somehow prevail , resulting in even more violent riots , and perhaps a military coup ?
Will they have him kicking and screaming to delight those with Trump Derangement Syndrome ?
Will his own Never Trumper cabinet publicly turn against him ?
Will Joe Biden hand the reigns of the presidency over to Kamala Harris ?
Will this be forced upon him after he publicly zones out , revealing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t know what ’ s going on ?
Will the virus disappear without Trump , or will the draconian lockdown go into overdrive ?
Stay tuned to As the Tyranny Turns .
And pop the popcorn .
The Best of Donald Jeffries

Those of us who are awake expected something like this. Perhaps not quite so blatant or heavy handed. But the in-your-face, Mafia-style voter fraud that has permeated the 2020 presidential election surprised even the most hardened critics of our crumbling country.
When I ended my appearance at 11 pm eastern time on Jeff Rense’s show on election night, Donald Trump was comfortably ahead in all the key states he needed to win, with a very high percentage of the vote counted. It was exceedingly strange how the networks refused to call those states for him, while putting states with lower percentages of the vote counted, and a smaller lead for Biden, in the former vice-president’s column.
The first sign something was amiss, other than the inconsistent state projections for the two candidates by all the networks, was the fact that late on election night, the vote counting just appeared to stop in all the crucial states. When it finally resumed the following day, virtually every new “drop” of votes seemed to be overwhelmingly in favor of Biden. Trump had a 500,000 vote lead in Pennsylvania with 80% of the vote counted. Biden made all that up and more, a seemingly statistical impossibility. States like Nevada just announced they would not be counting one day at all, to resume the next. Alleghany County in Pennsylvania declared that they couldn’t count on one particular day, due to “administrative work,” which apparently held priority over the vote. Hidden History: An Exp... Donald Jeffries Best Price: $9.86 Buy New $14.70 (as of 04:30 UTC - Details)
Boxes of ballots- reported to be anywhere from 130,000 to 200,000, in states like Michigan and Pennsylvania- arrived in the middle of the night. No one asked how that many votes were boxed together at some other site- were they all mailed in at the same time from somewhere?
The first-hand testimony of postal workers and precinct volunteers, who witnessed suspicious activity, was dismissed like all those “mistaken” JFK assassination witnesses have been over the years. The mantra of “there’s no evidence!” was shouted by every “journalist” in our controlled press. These are the same highly-paid mouthpieces for the state who insist there is “no evidence” of conspiracy or corruption anywhere.
The social media monopolies made a preemptive strike against troublesome videos and interviews questioning the fraud to come, when they banned over twenty of the most popular alternative You Tube channels, including many that had interviewed me countless times, a few weeks before the election. Once the election had been rigged, Twitter censored any references to fraud, even by the president of the United States. On Facebook, allegations of voting fraud were squelched by those mysterious “fact checkers” that are trotted out like an on-call Snopes unit.
The dead vote was evidently even more important in this election than it usually is. “Landslide” Lyndon Johnson first made the dead vote significant, during the corrupt 1948 U.S. Senate runoff election. The Trump campaign claims 10,000 dead people voted in Clark County, Nevada alone. Citizen journalists have found numerous 2020 voters who were born in the early 1900s or even nineteenth century. I talked to one researcher who discovered a woman born in 1800. Who voted in this election. What a sturdy soul!
Electoral fraud is nothing new in this country. Most Americans, even with their incredibly short memories, remember the “hanging chads” 2000 fiasco. Ironically, those blasting Trump for refusing to concede a week later, fail to note that the 2000 election hung in the balance for 37 days, until Bush was finally just installed as president by the Supreme Court. And now, new leftist hero Dubya, a vocal supporter of Joe Biden, urges Donald Trump to accept the results and stop alleging fraud. Crimes and Cover-ups i... Donald Jeffries Best Price: $17.17 Buy New $17.19 (as of 06:20 UTC - Details)
The entire establishment, from the deluded, largely unemployed contingent in Hollywood, to the professional “journalists” who are paid not to investigate or ask pertinent questions, to the politicians in both parties who benefit from the same rigged process, is dismissing any notion of fraud. The same establishment, of course, took seriously the fairy tale that “Russia” interfered in the 2016 election, denying us the glory of a Hillary Clinton presidency. They will defend the narrative, and conclude there is “no evidence” regardless. That’s part of their job.
The prime time lineup of Fox News; Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham, are covering the allegations of voting fraud in depth. This is the first time a demonized “conspiracy theory” is being given credence by any mainstream media outlet. Millions of people will view the evidence, and the guests who are being given a platform “conspiracy theorists” have always been denied. This is a pleasant and surprising development.
Whether Donald Trump and his team will stay strong, and ignore the predictable cucked advice of the Mitt Romneys, remains to be seen. His own son–in-law, who disagrees with every bit of his rhetoric, is said to be pressuring him to fold. Trump hasn’t inspired confidence in this regard; if the past four years are any indication, he will ultimately capitulate, after a firestorm of tweets promising the contrary.
Will Deep State Hall of Famer William Barr really honestly investigate this? This is the same “swamp drainer” who declined to prosecute the Queen of Corruption, Hillary Clinton, so color me skeptical. Never Trumpers remain ensconced atop both the FBI and CIA, although Trump has apparently fired his anti-Trump Secretary of Defense. His press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany boldly spoke out at a White House press briefing, but Neil Cavuto of Fox News just cut her off, declaring, “She’s charging the other side as welcoming fraud and welcoming illegal voting. Unless she has more details to back that up, I can’t in good countenance continue to show you this.”
Every pillar of the rotting establishment has a vested interest in concealing the extent of the corruption. Exposing our Banana Republic electoral process for what it is; with its dead voters, mail-in ballots without postmarks or signatures, blocked access to oversight, incredibly biased media projections, social media censorship, and much more, could unravel the whole mess. Once the first domino falls, the others will follow. Bullyocracy: How the S... Jeffries, Donald Best Price: $15.55 Buy New $14.00 (as of 11:47 UTC - Details)
But such a revelation requires at least one part of the state to accept, or even acknowledge it. Would that be our horrific, politicized courts? Our toothless state-run media? Our political “representatives?” The One Percenters who run the corporate world? Not a likely candidate in that bunch. Someone powerful enough to make a difference would have to outraged by the fraud. Who would that be?
The average “asleep” American simply cannot or will not confront the extent of the corruption. They will not believe until a suitable authority verifies what the “conspiracy theorists” are saying. The “woke” Left will never accept that this particular fraud is real, because that would mean they aren’t rid of the Giant Orange Man.
But for now, the spectacle is entertaining. Donald Trump threatening lawsuits, alleging widespread wrongdoing, and predicting victory. His many enemies growing angrier and angrier that he won’t concede. At least a few shows on Fox News airing sympathetic reports on the fraud allegations.
This promises to be a cliffhanger ending. Will Trump somehow prevail, resulting in even more violent riots, and perhaps a military coup? Will they have him kicking and screaming to delight those with Trump Derangement Syndrome? Will his own Never Trumper cabinet publicly turn against him?
Will Joe Biden hand the reigns of the presidency over to Kamala Harris? Will this be forced upon him after he publicly zones out, revealing to all that he simply doesn’t know what’s going on? Will the virus disappear without Trump, or will the draconian lockdown go into overdrive?
Stay tuned to As the Tyranny Turns. And pop the popcorn.
Reprinted with the author’s permission.
The Best of Donald Jeffries