Casablanca 2020

If you thought comedy was dead because of woke hysteria , fear no longer .
Hollywood has come to the rescue .
The Academy—a misnomer if there ever was one—has decreed that a movie can no longer be eligible for an Academy Award unless it meets certain criteria .
A group of greedy lowlifes will now decide what ’ s good for us to view , but such are the joys of La La Land nowadays .
( Surely you ’ ve read about it : In order to be considered for prizes , movies have to include blacks , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the disabled , the latter preferably of mixed race . )
Ticking all the boxes while casting a movie will now also come under Oscar consideration , while the rest of us enjoy a well-deserved laugh .
Just think of it : Lacking in originality since the late ’ 50s , Hollywood has always depended on recycling past triumphs .
When the remake of Casablanca is shot in the studio , as the original also was , Rick will be played by a black actor , Idris Elba , and Ilsa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s yet to be discovered . )
The new script will have Rick stuck in Casablanca after a failed drug deal , stalked by Major Strasser , a DEA agent of Hawaiian background with a fetish for Nazi uniforms .
The only white person in the movie will be the piano player , who tickles the ivories and plays “ As Time Goes By ” with his toes , having burnt his two hands to a crisp while stoking the embers in his coal-fired boiler .
Victor Laszlo , Ilsa ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to pimp her out to women until transformed by reading the Koran .
He , a Saudi , and Ilsa began their affair at university in Riyadh ; then the religious police came after them , and they separated while he was arrested but were reunited in Beirut and ended up in Casablanca .
Captain Renault will be played by the incarcerated R & B star R. Kelly , furloughed from prison where he resides at present for the duration of the shoot .
( The love of underage girls by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he plays make this casting a natural and very popular with fans . )
Beyond Woke Michael Rectenwald Buy New $ 19.99 Can you envision the endless possibilities , dear readers , once the woke brigades get hold of past Hollywood films ?
Denzel Washington can be a credible Rhett Butler , as can Rihanna playing Scarlett .
Trouble will start with the characters of Big Sam and Mamie , ditto when remaking Porgy and Bess .
Never mind , the new rules with transgender and nonbinary people shown lying in hospital in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s bombs are falling will rewrite American history .
Better yet , the new , improved Hollywood will take its cue from the Chinese , who micromanage all Chinese life , including the movies .
Tarzan films will obviously pose a problem , with Meghan Markle a believable Jane , and Tarzan played by Jamie Foxx .
It ’ s the natives that I ’ m worried about .
They will have to be of Scandinavian extraction and the movies shot in Norway , and the loincloth gives very little protection against frostbite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so don ’ t expect any new Tarzan flicks anytime soon .
The Godmother , needless to say , will pose no such problems .
The famous scene where Al Pacino shoots the bad white police captain in the face will be reshot exactly as in the original , with Cardi B blasting away at a Sterling Hayden look-alike .
The 1972 racist joke of “ Wops versus Cops ” will no longer apply , not with Cardi B , Lizzo as the Godmother , and other such black female stars burning up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Theodoracopulos

If you thought comedy was dead because of woke hysteria, fear no longer. Hollywood has come to the rescue. The Academy—a misnomer if there ever was one—has decreed that a movie can no longer be eligible for an Academy Award unless it meets certain criteria. A group of greedy lowlifes will now decide what’s good for us to view, but such are the joys of La La Land nowadays. (Surely you’ve read about it: In order to be considered for prizes, movies have to include blacks, homosexuals, lesbians, transsexuals, queers, and the disabled, the latter preferably of mixed race.) Ticking all the boxes while casting a movie will now also come under Oscar consideration, while the rest of us enjoy a well-deserved laugh. Just think of it: Lacking in originality since the late ’50s, Hollywood has always depended on recycling past triumphs. When the remake of Casablanca is shot in the studio, as the original also was, Rick will be played by a black actor, Idris Elba, and Ilsa by an Arab lesbian. (She’s yet to be discovered.) The new script will have Rick stuck in Casablanca after a failed drug deal, stalked by Major Strasser, a DEA agent of Hawaiian background with a fetish for Nazi uniforms. The only white person in the movie will be the piano player, who tickles the ivories and plays “As Time Goes By” with his toes, having burnt his two hands to a crisp while stoking the embers in his coal-fired boiler. Victor Laszlo, Ilsa’s hubby, is a sensitivity-training expert who used to pimp her out to women until transformed by reading the Koran. He, a Saudi, and Ilsa began their affair at university in Riyadh; then the religious police came after them, and they separated while he was arrested but were reunited in Beirut and ended up in Casablanca. Captain Renault will be played by the incarcerated R&B star R. Kelly, furloughed from prison where he resides at present for the duration of the shoot. (The love of underage girls by the R&B star and the character he plays make this casting a natural and very popular with fans.) Beyond Woke Michael Rectenwald Buy New $19.99 (as of 11:37 UTC - Details)
Can you envision the endless possibilities, dear readers, once the woke brigades get hold of past Hollywood films? Denzel Washington can be a credible Rhett Butler, as can Rihanna playing Scarlett. Trouble will start with the characters of Big Sam and Mamie, ditto when remaking Porgy and Bess. Never mind, the new rules with transgender and nonbinary people shown lying in hospital in Atlanta moaning and groaning while Sherman’s bombs are falling will rewrite American history.
Better yet, the new, improved Hollywood will take its cue from the Chinese, who micromanage all Chinese life, including the movies. Tarzan films will obviously pose a problem, with Meghan Markle a believable Jane, and Tarzan played by Jamie Foxx. It’s the natives that I’m worried about. They will have to be of Scandinavian extraction and the movies shot in Norway, and the loincloth gives very little protection against frostbite. There will be lawsuits galore, so don’t expect any new Tarzan flicks anytime soon.
The Godmother, needless to say, will pose no such problems. The famous scene where Al Pacino shoots the bad white police captain in the face will be reshot exactly as in the original, with Cardi B blasting away at a Sterling Hayden look-alike. The 1972 racist joke of “Wops versus Cops” will no longer apply, not with Cardi B, Lizzo as the Godmother, and other such black female stars burning up the silver screen..
Read the Whole Article
The Best of Taki Theodoracopulos


lewrockwell--2020-11-03--The Flawed Covid-19 Vaccine Testing Programs at Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca.

There doesn ’ t appear to be much difference between the testing protocols of the dozens of pharmaceutical companies that are working on developing a vaccine for the elusive ( and therefore dubious ) SARS virus that has not actually yet been isolated in the lab , much less been reproducibly-grown in living tissue cultures .
The evidence for the existence of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus in any given patient has mostly been assumptive in the current alleged pandemic which has relied on testing with the equally dubious PCR test kits that have been manufactured by any number of fly-by-night @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The “ case ” incidence and death statistics of the current alleged pandemic must therefore be also regarded as dubious because the PCR test ’ s inventor has repeatedly asserted that his test CAN NOT be used for diagnostic purposes .
Covid-19 : The Greatest ... Coleman , Dr Vernon Buy New $ 14.71 However , the aggressively Big Pharma/Big Media-promoted “ conventional wisdom ” says that if the PCR test turns out to be positive ( even if the PCR-positive individual is totally asymptomatic , always wore the masks and never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must be assumed to be so infectious that he must be quarantined for weeks .
If the subject does not comply with the quarantine order , he or she can– in certain jurisdictions – be arrested and imprisoned .
What should be of concern to thinking people is the fact that some of these pharma companies ( not to mention that many of the PCR test kit manufacturers ) are indeed just “ start-ups ” – like the National Institutes of Health ’ s ( and Anthony Fauci ’ s ) favorite vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine development – not manufacture .
Yet Moderna is deeply involved in the race for FDA approval , and its stock price has sky-rocketed on hopes that it might massage its test results enough to get its Covid-19 vaccine approved ( or at least be given Emergency Use Authorization [ EUA ] by the FDA ) .
Despite its sky-high stock price ( $ 67 per share as of October 30 , 2020 ) , Moderna has yet to earn a single penny from the sale of any of its handful of experimental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , developed its protocol for testing its 2-dose experimental Covid-19 vaccine that is essentially the same as the announced protocols of Johnson & Johnson , AstraZeneca and Pfizer ’ s Covid-19 vaccines in that half of the approximately 30,000 volunteers that they have amassed will be injected with two doses of its active vaccine ( each of which contains uncertain-to-be-safe ingredients ) .
The other half will be injected with a placebo .
( Interestingly , in the past , some vaccine-testing companies have added a tissue-toxic ingredient that will cause injection-site symptoms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t know if they got the vaccine or not . )
There are reportedly any number of start-up and established pharmaceutical corporations world-wide that are also trying to be the next block-buster vaccine-seller on the planet , but NONE of them , much less the four experimental vaccine companies listed below , have been following time-honored methods of testing its experimental drugs and vaccines on lab animals , a serious breach of protocol that has become the “ new normal ” in order to comply with President Trump ’ s Operation Warp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushing in order to produce a vaccine – any vaccine – before his re-election bid is decided !
!
Of course , the fast-tracking ( aka , “ short-circuiting ” ) of normal vaccine safety and efficacy studies has been condemned by all ethical scientists that don ’ t have economic or professional “ conflicts of interest ” that guarantee profitable results from the dangerous pseudoscientific pro-vaccine stances that Big Pharma shills like those in the Trump administration and the current HHS , NIH , CDC , NIAID and FDA has taken over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tentative , Emergency Use Authorization ( EUA ) from the already corporate-compromised FDA is likely to be granted even if the data that is presented to the FDA regulatory commissions are flawed and/or statistically insignificant – which means that the vaccine has not been proven to be safe and effective , especially in the long-term , which , by definition , can ’ t be safely assessed for many years .
Sadly , the members of most standard “ regulatory ” commissions are often corporate shills that have ulterior motives .
There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s study groups and they are essentially healthy , essentially middle-aged , eager and “ patriotic ” volunteers .
Half of the 30,000 will be injected with a series of two immunologically-active vaccines .
The other 15,000 members of the group will get two shots of a placebo that is supposed to be immunologically-inactive .
None of the 30,000 will be informed as to which group they are in .
Plandemic : Exposing th ... Fife , Dr. Bruce Buy New $ 8.95 The approximately 30,000 total human guinea pigs that signed up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until a paltry 53 of the 30,000 volunteers gets positive ( and very dubious ) PCR test results !
The 53 may not have – and may never develop – SARS signs and symptoms for them to be included in the study !
Of course , false-positive PCR tests are extremely common and can happen to anybody , especially people who have had a common cold , which is often caused by simple , benign coronaviruses .
The designers of the Moderna study – just like the other drug companies that are in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study should be considered relevant , reportable to the FDA as theoretical proof of effectiveness but they can not claim that their vaccine is either safe or effective long-term .
However , these short-term studies can only be partially relied upon for short-term safety and effectiveness if 13 or fewer of the 53 PCR-positive “ cases ” occurred in the vaccinated population while at the same time 40 or more of the positive PCR “ cases ” occurred in the placebo group .
What won ’ t be discussed will be the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group and the vaccine group also didn ’ t have positive PCR tests Covid-19 symptoms !
It is totally appropriate for legitimate doubters of America ’ s Big Pharma-co-opted drug and vaccine regulatory agencies to ask the question , “ What kind of Big Pharma-influenced , profit-oriented , junk science is behind the studies that are being hastily approved by the likes of the obviously co-opted HHS , NIH , CDC , NIAID and FDA ?
It is also totally appropriate for the public to have full information about what kind of coercive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appointees as his HHS director ( and non-physician ) Alex Azar , who came into Trump ’ s administration from a $ 2 million dollar per year CEO post at Big Pharma/Big Vaccine giant Eli Lilly .
Azar also is part of Trump ’ s Operation Warp Speed , which is the impetus behind the fast-tracking of vaccine development , which is certain to be a disaster .
There will surely be dubious conclusions coming from all of the other provably untrustworthy pharmaceutical corporations that are in the race to develop an Emergency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proven to be either safe or effective long-term – but will certainly be unaffordable .
Suspiciously , the major investment partner of start-up Moderna is actually the US government regulatory and funding body called the National Institutes of Health ( including the CDC and the NIAID ) which reportedly has a 50 % financial stake in the company .
One can safely assume that – given the corrupt capitalist system that has thoroughly taken over our nation – that every Moderna shareholder ( even our government bureaucracies ) will do everything they can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must suspect also that these government agencies and their buddies in the corporate world are doing everything they can to keep the sheeple from noticing the most important data points in the studies discussed .
And one of those bits of information is that at least 29,800 of the 30,000 volunteers in Moderna ’ s vaccine trials , will likely not become infected whether the got the placebo or the vaccine .
What could easily happen long-term is that a significant number of the 15,000 in the vaccine group , are at risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ autoimmune disorders .
Thimerosal : Let the Sc ... Kennedy Jr. , Robert F. Best Price : $ 18.01 Buy New $ 15.93 What About the Vaccine Trials of Pfizer , Johnson & Johnson , AstraZeneca , et .
al.
?
The other significant statistical realities that won ’ t be pointed out in the corporate-controlled medical journals ( or the corporate-controlled media ) are the concepts of “ Actual Vaccine Efficacy ” and “ Relative Vaccine Efficacy ” , which are akin to the likewise purposely hidden-from view Actual Risk Reduction ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RRR ) that are often ignored in drug efficacy trials .
For Moderna , 13 positive PCR tests in the 15,000 member vaccine arm of their trial 13/15,000 = 0.00086 ) is an arbitrarily chosen data point that , when compared to the placebo trial may represent some sort of significance .
0.00086 is an obviously miniscule number that is the same as a percentage figure of 0.086 % .
And 40 or more positive PCR tests in Moderna ’ s placebo group of 15,000 subjects ( 40/15,000 = 0.0027 ) likewise represents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % .
Subtracting 0.086 % from 0.27 % will obtain the “ actual ” miniscule benefit of being vaccinated ( 0.086 % ) with Moderna ’ s potentially toxic vaccine vs. receiving the presumably innocuous placebo .
However , the falsely-inflated “ relative ” vaccine effectiveness numbers means that in calculating the Moderna results takes the fraction 13/40 ( which = 0.325 in decimal terms , and which is 32.5 % in percentage terms .
The corporation ’ s mathematicians , in the standard method of calculating relative risk reduction ( RRR ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” , resulting in a decimal number of 0.675 ( which , in percentage terms is 67.5 % ) .
So Moderna statisticians – who may , incidentally , own shares in the company – will then report to his bosses at corporate headquarters the “ relative ” effectiveness rate of 67.5 % , which the bosses will receive as positive , whereas it is a actually a deceptively inflated figure when it is put side-by-side with the actual vaccine effectiveness number of 0.184 .
Note that Pfizer ’ s experimental vaccine trial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 32 in the 30,000 group , 25 in the 15,000 placebo group , and 7 in the 15,000 vaccine group as starting statistical analysis points .
Using those numbers , Pfizer ’ s statisticians are actually reporting out the falsely-inflated Relative Risk Reduction/Relative Vaccine Effectiveness numbers ( rather than the Actual Risk Reduction ( ARR ) numbers to America ’ s easily propagandized press corps and medical professionals , who can be relied upon to report – over and over again – the inflated benefits to their listeners , viewers and patients .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ using the same mathematical trickery as the other Gang of Four , using as their arbitrary PCR-positivity break-points the following numbers : 77 PCR-positive tests among the 30,000 total group ; 59 PCR-positive tests in the 15,000 person placebo group , and17 PCR-positive tests in the 15,000-person vaccine group .
AstraZeneca is doing the same , just using slightly different numbers of PCR-positivity : 50 in the 30,000 group , 38 in the15,000 placebo group and 12 in the 15,000 vaccinated group .
What we seem to have is well expressed in my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quote : “ There are 3 ( or 4 ) kinds of lies : Lies , Damned Lies , Statistics and Covid Statistics ” .
The Best of Gary G. Kohls , MD

There doesn’t appear to be much difference between the testing protocols of the dozens of pharmaceutical companies that are working on developing a vaccine for the elusive (and therefore dubious) SARS virus that has not actually yet been isolated in the lab, much less been reproducibly-grown in living tissue cultures.
The evidence for the existence of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus in any given patient has mostly been assumptive in the current alleged pandemic which has relied on testing with the equally dubious PCR test kits that have been manufactured by any number of fly-by-night outfits which are making unreliable test kits.
The “case” incidence and death statistics of the current alleged pandemic must therefore be also regarded as dubious because the PCR test’s inventor has repeatedly asserted that his test CANNOT be used for diagnostic purposes. Covid-19: The Greatest... Coleman, Dr Vernon Buy New $14.71 (as of 04:43 UTC - Details)
However, the aggressively Big Pharma/Big Media-promoted “conventional wisdom” says that if the PCR test turns out to be positive (even if the PCR-positive individual is totally asymptomatic, always wore the masks and never ever developed Covid symptoms) that subject must be assumed to be so infectious that he must be quarantined for weeks. If the subject does not comply with the quarantine order, he or she can– in certain jurisdictions – be arrested and imprisoned.
What should be of concern to thinking people is the fact that some of these pharma companies (not to mention that many of the PCR test kit manufacturers) are indeed just “start-ups” – like the National Institutes of Health’s (and Anthony Fauci’s) favorite vaccine company Moderna, whose business only involves vaccine development – not manufacture.
Yet Moderna is deeply involved in the race for FDA approval, and its stock price has sky-rocketed on hopes that it might massage its test results enough to get its Covid-19 vaccine approved (or at least be given Emergency Use Authorization [EUA] by the FDA).
Despite its sky-high stock price ($67 per share as of October 30, 2020), Moderna has yet to earn a single penny from the sale of any of its handful of experimental vaccines. It has, not surprisingly, developed its protocol for testing its 2-dose experimental Covid-19 vaccine that is essentially the same as the announced protocols of Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccines in that half of the approximately 30,000 volunteers that they have amassed will be injected with two doses of its active vaccine (each of which contains uncertain-to-be-safe ingredients). The other half will be injected with a placebo. (Interestingly, in the past, some vaccine-testing companies have added a tissue-toxic ingredient that will cause injection-site symptoms presumably so that the placebo group won’t know if they got the vaccine or not.)
There are reportedly any number of start-up and established pharmaceutical corporations world-wide that are also trying to be the next block-buster vaccine-seller on the planet, but NONE of them, much less the four experimental vaccine companies listed below, have been following time-honored methods of testing its experimental drugs and vaccines on lab animals, a serious breach of protocol that has become the “new normal” in order to comply with President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, agenda which Trump has been pushing in order to produce a vaccine – any vaccine – before his re-election bid is decided!!
Of course, the fast-tracking (aka, “short-circuiting”) of normal vaccine safety and efficacy studies has been condemned by all ethical scientists that don’t have economic or professional “conflicts of interest” that guarantee profitable results from the dangerous pseudoscientific pro-vaccine stances that Big Pharma shills like those in the Trump administration and the current HHS, NIH, CDC, NIAID and FDA has taken over the past 10 months.
Conditional, tentative, Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the already corporate-compromised FDA is likely to be granted even if the data that is presented to the FDA regulatory commissions are flawed and/or statistically insignificant – which means that the vaccine has not been proven to be safe and effective, especially in the long-term, which, by definition, can’t be safely assessed for many years. Sadly, the members of most standard “regulatory” commissions are often corporate shills that have ulterior motives.
There are 30,000 volunteers in each drug company’s study groups and they are essentially healthy, essentially middle-aged, eager and “patriotic” volunteers. Half of the 30,000 will be injected with a series of two immunologically-active vaccines. The other 15,000 members of the group will get two shots of a placebo that is supposed to be immunologically-inactive. None of the 30,000 will be informed as to which group they are in. Plandemic: Exposing th... Fife, Dr. Bruce Buy New $8.95 (as of 02:15 UTC - Details)
The approximately 30,000 total human guinea pigs that signed up for the Moderna study will be monitored until a paltry 53 of the 30,000 volunteers gets positive (and very dubious) PCR test results! The 53 may not have – and may never develop – SARS signs and symptoms for them to be included in the study!
Of course, false-positive PCR tests are extremely common and can happen to anybody, especially people who have had a common cold, which is often caused by simple, benign coronaviruses.
The designers of the Moderna study – just like the other drug companies that are in the race – will argue that their study should be considered relevant, reportable to the FDA as theoretical proof of effectiveness but they cannot claim that their vaccine is either safe or effective long-term.
However, these short-term studies can only be partially relied upon for short-term safety and effectiveness if 13 or fewer of the 53 PCR-positive “cases” occurred in the vaccinated population while at the same time 40 or more of the positive PCR “cases” occurred in the placebo group. What won’t be discussed will be the fact that over 14,900 of both the placebo group and the vaccine group also didn’t have positive PCR tests Covid-19 symptoms!
It is totally appropriate for legitimate doubters of America’s Big Pharma-co-opted drug and vaccine regulatory agencies to ask the question, “What kind of Big Pharma-influenced, profit-oriented, junk science is behind the studies that are being hastily approved by the likes of the obviously co-opted HHS, NIH, CDC, NIAID and FDA?
It is also totally appropriate for the public to have full information about what kind of coercive pro-vaccine influence is coming from such Trump appointees as his HHS director (and non-physician) Alex Azar, who came into Trump’s administration from a $2 million dollar per year CEO post at Big Pharma/Big Vaccine giant Eli Lilly. Azar also is part of Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, which is the impetus behind the fast-tracking of vaccine development, which is certain to be a disaster.
There will surely be dubious conclusions coming from all of the other provably untrustworthy pharmaceutical corporations that are in the race to develop an Emergency Use Authorized-vaccine that will not have been proven to be either safe or effective long-term – but will certainly be unaffordable.
Suspiciously, the major investment partner of start-up Moderna is actually the US government regulatory and funding body called the National Institutes of Health (including the CDC and the NIAID) which reportedly has a 50% financial stake in the company.
One can safely assume that – given the corrupt capitalist system that has thoroughly taken over our nation – that every Moderna shareholder (even our government bureaucracies) will do everything they can do to promote its products.
One must suspect also that these government agencies and their buddies in the corporate world are doing everything they can to keep the sheeple from noticing the most important data points in the studies discussed.
And one of those bits of information is that at least 29,800 of the 30,000 volunteers in Moderna’s vaccine trials, will likely not become infected whether the got the placebo or the vaccine. What could easily happen long-term is that a significant number of the 15,000 in the vaccine group, are at risk of developing disabling chronic illnesses such as autoimmune disorders. Thimerosal: Let the Sc... Kennedy Jr., Robert F. Best Price: $18.01 Buy New $15.93 (as of 02:45 UTC - Details)
What About the Vaccine Trials of Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, et. al.?
The other significant statistical realities that won’t be pointed out in the corporate-controlled medical journals (or the corporate-controlled media) are the concepts of “Actual Vaccine Efficacy” and “Relative Vaccine Efficacy”, which are akin to the likewise purposely hidden-from view Actual Risk Reduction (AAR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) that are often ignored in drug efficacy trials.
For Moderna, 13 positive PCR tests in the 15,000 member vaccine arm of their trial 13/15,000 = 0.00086) is an arbitrarily chosen data point that, when compared to the placebo trial may represent some sort of significance. 0.00086 is an obviously miniscule number that is the same as a percentage figure of 0.086 %.
And 40 or more positive PCR tests in Moderna’s placebo group of 15,000 subjects (40/15,000 = 0.0027) likewise represents a similarly miniscule percentage figure of 0.27 %. Subtracting 0.086 % from 0.27 % will obtain the “actual” miniscule benefit of being vaccinated (0.086 %) with Moderna’s potentially toxic vaccine vs. receiving the presumably innocuous placebo.
However, the falsely-inflated “relative” vaccine effectiveness numbers means that in calculating the Moderna results takes the fraction 13/40 (which = 0.325 in decimal terms, and which is 32.5% in percentage terms. The corporation’s mathematicians, in the standard method of calculating relative risk reduction (RRR), subtracts the 0.325 from “1”, resulting in a decimal number of 0.675 (which, in percentage terms is 67.5%).
So Moderna statisticians – who may, incidentally, own shares in the company – will then report to his bosses at corporate headquarters the “relative” effectiveness rate of 67.5 %, which the bosses will receive as positive, whereas it is a actually a deceptively inflated figure when it is put side-by-side with the actual vaccine effectiveness number of 0.184.
Note that Pfizer’s experimental vaccine trial also uses the PCR positivity number of 32 in the 30,000 group, 25 in the 15,000 placebo group, and 7 in the 15,000 vaccine group as starting statistical analysis points.
Using those numbers, Pfizer’s statisticians are actually reporting out the falsely-inflated Relative Risk Reduction/Relative Vaccine Effectiveness numbers (rather than the Actual Risk Reduction (ARR) numbers to America’s easily propagandized press corps and medical professionals, who can be relied upon to report – over and over again – the inflated benefits to their listeners, viewers and patients.
Predictably, Johnson & Johnson is also using the same mathematical trickery as the other Gang of Four, using as their arbitrary PCR-positivity break-points the following numbers: 77 PCR-positive tests among the 30,000 total group; 59 PCR-positive tests in the 15,000 person placebo group, and17 PCR-positive tests in the 15,000-person vaccine group.
AstraZeneca is doing the same, just using slightly different numbers of PCR-positivity: 50 in the 30,000 group, 38 in the15,000 placebo group and 12 in the 15,000 vaccinated group.
What we seem to have is well expressed in my version of Mark Twain’s famous quote: “There are 3 (or 4) kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics and Covid Statistics”.
Discuss.

The Best of Gary G. Kohls, MD


lewrockwell--2020-11-03--The Democrats Have Their Wish in a Mental Wreck Named Joe Biden

People joke about Joe Biden ’ s mental state and his ridiculous gaffes , but it isn ’ t funny when he could become the next president of the United States .
Democrats have been saying they would vote for anyone except Trump .
Well , they have their anyone now .
Biden says he ’ s running against George Bush .
At one point he seems to be saying he ’ s running for the senate .
Then he utters a mouthful of indecipherable mush .
It says something about the Democrat Party—they are running a disabled old man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the highest office in the land .
Before his brain aneurysm and pulmonary thrombosis , in 1988 , Biden was a highly intelligent political operator .
His brand of globalism was similar to Bill Clinton ’ s , but without Clinton ’ s self-confident flair and big bullshit front .
Since 1988 , Biden has gradually deteriorated .
In his present state , he should be out of politics altogether .
The Left press continues to treat Biden as if he ’ s a genuine candidate , when they know he isn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They know he ’ s a shell of his former self .
They know he has to be under constant medical care , just to stay upright .
The Book of Bidenisms : ... Books , DJAZ Buy New $ 6.99 I ’ ve already written extensively about Biden ’ s disastrous policies ( here and here ) , which come straight from his handlers .
Here I ’ m talking about something far more basic : the man is mentally incompetent .
A political party that would run this man for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state of degradation .
I ’ ve seen surrealism in American politics since Harry Truman sat in the Oval Office .
But I ’ ve never seen anything as surreal as this .
Remember the psychiatrists who were taking diagnostic shots at Trump and calling him mentally ill ?
Where are they now ?
These frauds have nothing to say about Biden .
As I write this , the hoax-piled-on-hoax COVID case numbers in America stand at just over NINE MILLION .
The people pulling Biden ’ s strings , and the strings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Kamala Harris , plan to use those numbers to lock down America again .
And they ’ re planning this on the back of sick and incompetent old man they ’ ve shoved into the spotlight to take the presidency of the United States .
The Best of Jon Rappoport

People joke about Joe Biden’s mental state and his ridiculous gaffes, but it isn’t funny when he could become the next president of the United States.
Democrats have been saying they would vote for anyone except Trump. Well, they have their anyone now.
Biden says he’s running against George Bush. At one point he seems to be saying he’s running for the senate. Then he utters a mouthful of indecipherable mush.
It says something about the Democrat Party—they are running a disabled old man with severe mental and motor deficits for the highest office in the land.
Before his brain aneurysm and pulmonary thrombosis, in 1988, Biden was a highly intelligent political operator. His brand of globalism was similar to Bill Clinton’s, but without Clinton’s self-confident flair and big bullshit front. Since 1988, Biden has gradually deteriorated. In his present state, he should be out of politics altogether.
The Left press continues to treat Biden as if he’s a genuine candidate, when they know he isn’t. They know he is disabled. They know he’s a shell of his former self. They know he has to be under constant medical care, just to stay upright. The Book of Bidenisms:... Books, DJAZ Buy New $6.99 (as of 06:03 UTC - Details)
I’ve already written extensively about Biden’s disastrous policies (here and here), which come straight from his handlers. Here I’m talking about something far more basic: the man is mentally incompetent.
A political party that would run this man for the presidency is itself in a severe state of degradation.
I’ve seen surrealism in American politics since Harry Truman sat in the Oval Office. But I’ve never seen anything as surreal as this.
Remember the psychiatrists who were taking diagnostic shots at Trump and calling him mentally ill? Where are they now? These frauds have nothing to say about Biden.
As I write this, the hoax-piled-on-hoax COVID case numbers in America stand at just over NINE MILLION. The people pulling Biden’s strings, and the strings of his replacement in the Oval Office, Kamala Harris, plan to use those numbers to lock down America again.
And they’re planning this on the back of sick and incompetent old man they’ve shoved into the spotlight to take the presidency of the United States.
Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
The Best of Jon Rappoport


Black Privilege

It has been said over and over that all the rioting , looting and destruction that has been inflicted upon America in the last six months is due to racism .
We have been told repeatedly that America is an irredeemably racist society that discriminates against black people .
“ Systemic ” and “ structural ” are the terms used to describe the nature of America ’ s alleged oppressiveness .
The stream of unceasing allegations has been kept up – unsurprisingly – by the political left .
One of the recent examples is Michelle Obama who said this of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the American people : “ So , what the president is doing is , once again , patently false .
It ’ s morally wrong and , yes , it is racist.
” As the rest of them , Michelle Obama is a brazen liar .
Donald Trump is not a racist and neither is this country .
There is no systemic or structural racism in American society .
Quite to the contrary , in America black people enjoy an array of rights and advantages that are unavailable to the rest of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Black Privilege .
And this privilege is very efficacious indeed .
False Black Power ?
( Ne ... Jason L. Riley Best Price : $ 8.95 Buy New $ 8.95 It is ironic that Michele Obama should play the race card given that she and her husband benefitted so richly from their Black Privilege .
To begin with , Barack Obama – a black man – was elected to the highest office in what is a majority white country .
He was not elected not only once , but twice – in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plurality of the votes that catapulted him to the presidency were cast by white people .
The repeated election of a black man to the most prestigious post in American society should blow out of the water any claims of anti-black racism .
But this is not all .
The reason why Barack Obama was elected was primarily because of the color of his skin .
It would not be unfair to say that Mr. Obama was probably the most under-accomplished candidate to ever become a US President .
A junior first-term senator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidency were virtually nonexistent .
By his own admission , his most consequential employment prior to his entry into politics was as a community organizer .
As a senator , both on the state and federal level , he had little to show for it .
He apparently neither sponsored nor originated any significant laws or initiatives .
While a state senator he merely voted “ present ” on a number of occasions .
Apparently being an agitator in the south side of Chicago and a good talker were his major qualification for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ background when he declared his candidacy for the highest office in this land .
Were Mr. Obama white , he would have never gotten anywhere close to the Oval Office .
Given his obvious lack of experience , a white Obama would have been laughed at the moment he announced his intention to seek the presidency .
There can be no question that Obama was elected primarily because he is black .
How could – we have to ask – such a thing happen in an allegedly deeply racist country ?
If Joe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this election , there is a great likelihood – given Biden ’ s enfeebled state – that within two years Kamala Harris would succeed him as president .
Should this happen , it would mean that America would have two black presidents within six years .
Both would be “ affirmative action ” presidents , since Kamala Harris was also chosen to be Biden ’ s running mate primarily because she is black ( the second reason was that she is a far-left woman ) .
Harris was certainly not selected because she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact , her main talent seems to be bestowing sexual favors upon her political benefactors .
But such is the great power of Black Privilege that black men and women can be propelled into the Oval Office despite their lack of accomplishments and qualifications .
Please Stop Helping Us ... Riley , Jason L. Best Price : $ 17.99 Buy New $ 9.50 Black Privilege , however , is not operative only in politics , but in every area of American society .
In school admissions , for example , black candidates are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colors , most notably whites and Asians .
A couple of months ago , the US Department of Justice found Yale University to be in violation of federal anti-discrimination laws .
Apparently at Yale black candidates were ninety percent more likely to be admitted than their white counterparts with roughly comparable credentials .
This is nothing but blatant anti-white racism .
Yale , of course , was not alone in this .
This kind of pro-black racism has been a common practice at institutions of higher learning across the United States .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of American life : standards have been lowered for black people across the board in order to give them advantage over other racial groups .
Nor need we mention pro-black racism in government employment and contracting .
Numerous welfare programs operate on an implicitly race-qualification basis , having been designed and tweaked to channel funds especially to blacks .
Because of Black Privilege , black criminals receive special consideration in encounters with the police .
Despite of what we have been told by leftist demagogues , black felons are treated more leniently than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suspects are far less likely to be shot by the police than white suspects .
This is not surprising , given the fact that that the use of force against blacks is treated with special severity by review boards and judicial bodies .
And this holds true despite that fact that though blacks constitute only 13 % of the population , they commit more than 50 % of all violent crimes and murders .
The truth is that most violent criminals and troublemakers in American society are black .
By lowering the standards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treating them with undue leniency , American society further encourages black criminality and delinquency… to everyone ’ s harm .
The demagogues use misleading videos such as the one of George Floyd to assert that black people are routinely harassed and killed by the police .
Such claims are simply preposterous .
In 2019 , fourteen unarmed black men were shot dead in the US by police .
Almost all of them posed imminent danger to others at the time they were killed .
By way of contrast , several thousand black people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same period .
The talk of black genocide by the police is just another of the left ’ s monstrous lies .
( By the way , George Floyd was not killed by his arresting cop .
He died of a fentanyl overdose . )
White Guilt : How Black ... Steele , Shelby Best Price : $ 13.13 Buy New $ 10.08 We got to see Black Privilege up close during the recent and ongoing riots .
We saw the videos of thousands of black youths rampaging , stealing and looting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stood by , watching .
Most of these criminals will never be brought to justice .
They have been able to commit these crimes and get away with them purely because they are black .
If white thugs ever attempted to loot and rampage in this fashion , they would be quickly dealt with by law enforcement .
They would be shot on sight , as is customarily done in such situations .
But the police would never do such a thing to black hoodlums .
Such is the power of Black Privilege @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constantly excused and taken off the hook just because they are black .
The truth is that there are two standards in this country : one is for blacks who are given preferential treatment and all kinds of advantages , and the other is for everyone else .
Blacks get away with things that members of other races never would get away with .
How astonishing , then , that Michelle Obama would complain of racism .
With a net worth of over 100 million dollars , the Obamas are richer than 99.9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And how did the Obamas amass their immense wealth and power ?
They have gained it through Black Privilege .
Said Michelle Obama in her pre-election missive : “ I want everyone who is still undecided to think about all those folks like me and my ancestors , the millions of folks who look like me and fought and died and toiled as slaves and soldiers and laborers to help build this country.
” Yes , Mrs. Obama , we do think of you when we contemplate the racial situation in this country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no lowly black slave but a wealthy and powerful woman who has obtained her great fortune on the back of her Black Privilege .
If you and your husband were white , you would be just another suburban couple .
It is because you are black that you were able to attain to the great heights of power and financial success .
You can be sure most people do not like it when a person like you plays the race card like this .
Frankly , you look phony .
What a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama could have been a true leader for the black community .
She could have been an example to those who look up to her – an example of gratitude to the country which provided such ample opportunities for its black citizens .
Instead she talks of slaves .
Has she not noticed that we have long moved beyond that ?
After all , slaves are not elected president .
Blackout : How Black Am ... Owens , Candace Buy New $ 16.73 Here is truth to power for you : never in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good as blacks have it in America today .
Blacks are not only completely equal but enjoy special advantages that are unavailable to the rest of the population .
The accusations of discrimination are an egregious lie .
Our society has been set aflame on the basis of a complete fiction .
Blacks today are rioting and complaining not because they have been discriminated against , but because American society has not been willing to enforce the basic standards of decency , morality and good behavior in the black community .
Writing about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the great black writer Walter Williams makes the same point : “ Often , they accept behavior and standards from black people that they would not begin to accept from white people.
” In other words , what we are witnessing is a moral tragedy , not a racist one .
This , however , is not the fault of blacks .
This situation has been deliberately created by white leftists .
The reason for their malevolence is the desire to subvert American society .
More than six decades ago , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apart by fomenting racial division and conflict .
This they accomplished by destroying the moral fiber of the black community through techniques such the lowering of standards , undue leniency , over-indulgence and fostered dependency on the state .
Once you ruin a racial demographic , there will inevitably follow anger , resentment and strife .
We are now seeing the results of this subversion .
CANDACE OWENS : BLACKOU ... Robert , Oliver Buy New $ 10.50 The MAGA Doctrine : The ... Kirk , Charlie Best Price : $ 9.99 Buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kohlmayer

It has been said over and over that all the rioting, looting and destruction that has been inflicted upon America in the last six months is due to racism. We have been told repeatedly that America is an irredeemably racist society that discriminates against black people. “Systemic” and “structural” are the terms used to describe the nature of America’s alleged oppressiveness.
The stream of unceasing allegations has been kept up – unsurprisingly – by the political left. One of the recent examples is Michelle Obama who said this of Donald Trump in her pre-election message to the American people:
“So, what the president is doing is, once again, patently false. It’s morally wrong and, yes, it is racist.”
As the rest of them, Michelle Obama is a brazen liar. Donald Trump is not a racist and neither is this country. There is no systemic or structural racism in American society. Quite to the contrary, in America black people enjoy an array of rights and advantages that are unavailable to the rest of the American population and can only be described as Black Privilege. And this privilege is very efficacious indeed. False Black Power? (Ne... Jason L. Riley Best Price: $8.95 Buy New $8.95 (as of 10:15 UTC - Details)
It is ironic that Michele Obama should play the race card given that she and her husband benefitted so richly from their Black Privilege. To begin with, Barack Obama – a black man – was elected to the highest office in what is a majority white country. He was not elected not only once, but twice – in 2008 and again in 2012. The plurality of the votes that catapulted him to the presidency were cast by white people. The repeated election of a black man to the most prestigious post in American society should blow out of the water any claims of anti-black racism.
But this is not all. The reason why Barack Obama was elected was primarily because of the color of his skin. It would not be unfair to say that Mr. Obama was probably the most under-accomplished candidate to ever become a US President. A junior first-term senator from Illinois, his qualifications for the presidency were virtually nonexistent. By his own admission, his most consequential employment prior to his entry into politics was as a community organizer. As a senator, both on the state and federal level, he had little to show for it. He apparently neither sponsored nor originated any significant laws or initiatives. While a state senator he merely voted “present” on a number of occasions. Apparently being an agitator in the south side of Chicago and a good talker were his major qualification for office.
Such was Obama’s background when he declared his candidacy for the highest office in this land. Were Mr. Obama white, he would have never gotten anywhere close to the Oval Office. Given his obvious lack of experience, a white Obama would have been laughed at the moment he announced his intention to seek the presidency. There can be no question that Obama was elected primarily because he is black. How could – we have to ask – such a thing happen in an allegedly deeply racist country?
If Joe Biden should come out on top in this election, there is a great likelihood – given Biden’s enfeebled state – that within two years Kamala Harris would succeed him as president. Should this happen, it would mean that America would have two black presidents within six years. Both would be “affirmative action” presidents, since Kamala Harris was also chosen to be Biden’s running mate primarily because she is black (the second reason was that she is a far-left woman). Harris was certainly not selected because she is particularly competent or distinguished. In fact, her main talent seems to be bestowing sexual favors upon her political benefactors. But such is the great power of Black Privilege that black men and women can be propelled into the Oval Office despite their lack of accomplishments and qualifications. Please Stop Helping Us... Riley, Jason L. Best Price: $17.99 Buy New $9.50 (as of 04:34 UTC - Details)
Black Privilege, however, is not operative only in politics, but in every area of American society. In school admissions, for example, black candidates are blatantly advantaged over candidates of other skin colors, most notably whites and Asians. A couple of months ago, the US Department of Justice found Yale University to be in violation of federal anti-discrimination laws. Apparently at Yale black candidates were ninety percent more likely to be admitted than their white counterparts with roughly comparable credentials. This is nothing but blatant anti-white racism. Yale, of course, was not alone in this. This kind of pro-black racism has been a common practice at institutions of higher learning across the United States. This approach has been adopted in all spheres of American life: standards have been lowered for black people across the board in order to give them advantage over other racial groups.
Nor need we mention pro-black racism in government employment and contracting. Numerous welfare programs operate on an implicitly race-qualification basis, having been designed and tweaked to channel funds especially to blacks. Because of Black Privilege, black criminals receive special consideration in encounters with the police. Despite of what we have been told by leftist demagogues, black felons are treated more leniently than other racial groups. Indeed, black suspects are far less likely to be shot by the police than white suspects. This is not surprising, given the fact that that the use of force against blacks is treated with special severity by review boards and judicial bodies. And this holds true despite that fact that though blacks constitute only 13% of the population, they commit more than 50% of all violent crimes and murders. The truth is that most violent criminals and troublemakers in American society are black. By lowering the standards of acceptable behavior for blacks and by treating them with undue leniency, American society further encourages black criminality and delinquency… to everyone’s harm.
The demagogues use misleading videos such as the one of George Floyd to assert that black people are routinely harassed and killed by the police. Such claims are simply preposterous. In 2019, fourteen unarmed black men were shot dead in the US by police. Almost all of them posed imminent danger to others at the time they were killed. By way of contrast, several thousand black people were killed by other black people in the same period. The talk of black genocide by the police is just another of the left’s monstrous lies. (By the way, George Floyd was not killed by his arresting cop. He died of a fentanyl overdose.)
White Guilt: How Black... Steele, Shelby Best Price: $13.13 Buy New $10.08 (as of 05:01 UTC - Details) We got to see Black Privilege up close during the recent and ongoing riots. We saw the videos of thousands of black youths rampaging, stealing and looting stores and businesses while the police just stood by, watching. Most of these criminals will never be brought to justice. They have been able to commit these crimes and get away with them purely because they are black. If white thugs ever attempted to loot and rampage in this fashion, they would be quickly dealt with by law enforcement. They would be shot on sight, as is customarily done in such situations. But the police would never do such a thing to black hoodlums. Such is the power of Black Privilege.
In America black people are being constantly excused and taken off the hook just because they are black. The truth is that there are two standards in this country: one is for blacks who are given preferential treatment and all kinds of advantages, and the other is for everyone else. Blacks get away with things that members of other races never would get away with.
How astonishing, then, that Michelle Obama would complain of racism. With a net worth of over 100 million dollars, the Obamas are richer than 99.9 percent of white people in America. And how did the Obamas amass their immense wealth and power? They have gained it through Black Privilege. Said Michelle Obama in her pre-election missive:
“I want everyone who is still undecided to think about all those folks like me and my ancestors, the millions of folks who look like me and fought and died and toiled as slaves and soldiers and laborers to help build this country.”
Yes, Mrs. Obama, we do think of you when we contemplate the racial situation in this country. What we see, however, is no lowly black slave but a wealthy and powerful woman who has obtained her great fortune on the back of her Black Privilege. If you and your husband were white, you would be just another suburban couple. It is because you are black that you were able to attain to the great heights of power and financial success. You can be sure most people do not like it when a person like you plays the race card like this. Frankly, you look phony.
What a wasted opportunity. A woman like Michelle Obama could have been a true leader for the black community. She could have been an example to those who look up to her – an example of gratitude to the country which provided such ample opportunities for its black citizens. Instead she talks of slaves. Has she not noticed that we have long moved beyond that? After all, slaves are not elected president.
Blackout: How Black Am... Owens, Candace Buy New $16.73 (as of 06:22 UTC - Details) Here is truth to power for you: never in history has any minority had it as good as blacks have it in America today. Blacks are not only completely equal but enjoy special advantages that are unavailable to the rest of the population. The accusations of discrimination are an egregious lie. Our society has been set aflame on the basis of a complete fiction. Blacks today are rioting and complaining not because they have been discriminated against, but because American society has not been willing to enforce the basic standards of decency, morality and good behavior in the black community. Writing about the prevailing attitude of whites toward blacks, the great black writer Walter Williams makes the same point: “Often, they accept behavior and standards from black people that they would not begin to accept from white people.”
In other words, what we are witnessing is a moral tragedy, not a racist one. This, however, is not the fault of blacks. This situation has been deliberately created by white leftists. The reason for their malevolence is the desire to subvert American society. More than six decades ago, they figured out that they could tear America apart by fomenting racial division and conflict. This they accomplished by destroying the moral fiber of the black community through techniques such the lowering of standards, undue leniency, over-indulgence and fostered dependency on the state. Once you ruin a racial demographic, there will inevitably follow anger, resentment and strife. We are now seeing the results of this subversion.
CANDACE OWENS: BLACKOU... Robert, Oliver Buy New $10.50 (as of 06:45 UTC - Details) The MAGA Doctrine: The... Kirk, Charlie Best Price: $9.99 Buy New $13.50 (as of 04:42 UTC - Details)
The Best of Vasko Kohlmayer


lewrockwell--2020-11-05--The Election Was a Tie. Now What?

The Election Was a Tie. Now What?

Election Day 2020 finally arrived , and it looks like it ’ s going to be a long process before the official winner is finally determined .
There will be lawsuits over which ballots will be counted .
Both sides will be accused of fraud and of other misdeeds .
And when it comes down to it , the final outcome will depend on thin margins in several states , and there will be doubts about the honesty of the count in each case .
But no matter what happens , Congress will have to certify and make a final @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the electoral college .
It is quite possible that only then will there be a known and settled winner .
Instant Vortex Plus Ai ... Best Price : $ 83.99 Buy New $ 119.99 Of course , none of this was supposed to happen .
According to the pollsters , voters would vote in a “ blue wave , ” with Biden handily winning in countless battleground states , including Florida .
In currently disputed states like Wisconsin and Michigan , many pollsters gave Biden an edge of 10 percent or more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ October had Biden up by 17points .
The same poll had Biden up by 7 points in both Michigan and Pennsylvania .
Lindsay Graham was supposed to lose his seat in North Carolina .
In reality , Republicans look to maintain control of the Senate .
The Republicans also picked up seats in the House of Representatives .
From the Democratic Party ’ s perspective , they clearly “ underperformed , ” and Glenn Greenwald summed it up this morning , stating : But Democratic underperformance doesn ’ t mean Trump did well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much of his 2016 support among women and nonwhites .
He did worse with white men .
Moreover , in some parts of the country , he did much better with Hispanics .
Nor are we just talking about Cubans , who have long leaned Republican in many election years .
As the Gravel Institute noted today : “ Zapata County , Texas is the second most Hispanic county in America .
In 2012 , Obama won it by 43 points .
In 2016 , Hillary won it by 33 points .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ points .
What a disaster.
” This all gives hints as to where electoral trends might be heading in the future .
The Ruling Party Has No Mandate But for now , the fact remains that this election has produced a result where it is abundantly clear that half of the electorate voted to oust the other half .
At least among those who vote , it ’ s pretty clear the United States is in the midst of a 51 to 49 percent split .
And this isn ’ t just at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states are evenly split as well .
GoWISE USA 1700-Watt 5 ... Buy New $ 79.99 At this point it would be absurd for the winner to claim—as he is likely to do—that he will get down to doing “ the people ’ s work ” or that he wants to accomplish the mandate the voters gave him .
What mandate ?
Even in a lopsided election , it ’ s never clear why the voters voted the way they did , and it ’ s impossible to therefore translate “ the will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That ’ s all the more obvious now , given the clear half-and-half division that ’ s now in place .
In other words , all the usual tired bromides about democratic elections should be more clear than ever .
There is no ” will of the majority.
” The winner doesn ’ t represent “ the nation.
” There is no consensus .
We ’ re not coming together “ as a people.
” These tired slogans should now strike every intelligent person as nonsense uttered only by pundits and politicians desperate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a ruling cadre that has clearly been rejected by approximately half the country .
The bad news lies largely in what isn ’ t being discussed .
The US ’ s unsustainable fiscal policy was never a significant election issue .
There was no discussion over healthcare .
That ’ s all just assumed to be a matter for government regulation and control .
In spite of what the anti-Trump commentators say , Donald Trump has never been “ far right ” or a candidate who pushes anything resembling laissez-faire .
Rather , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushed new gun controls , signed off on massive amounts of new fiscal spending and debt , and in the early days of the covid-19 panic actually empowered the most hysterical “ experts ” supporting nationwide lockdowns .
Far from taking a principled decentralist or profreedom position , Trump did next to nothing to oppose what David Stockman calls “ the overnight lurch into the inherently unconstitutional and destructive regime of economic martial law that enveloped the nation within days.
” Trump ’ s inaction was mostly a deer-in-the-headlights reaction which had no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ right-wing ” one— and also allowed the lockdowners to control the narrative for months .
Meanwhile , the Democrats ran on a solidly leftist platform pushing a Green New Deal , a “ Great Reset , ” and nationwide lockdowns , all while adopting and expanding Trump ’ s embrace of the bottomless abyss of government deficits .
New House Kitchen Digi ... Buy New $ 74.99 An overwhelming Trump victory would have provided little more than a tap on the brakes against the current Biden proposals .
Clearly , not even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we expect anything other than a continued path down the road of center-left policy at varying speeds ?
Regardless of how the Democrats perform in 2020 , the Left has a lock on the public schools , the universities , the news media , and social media .
The fact that Trump supporters can be called “ right wing ” is an indication of how far the nation ’ s ideology has moved to the left in recent decades .
Until dissenters from the zeitgeist can assert far greater control through cultural institutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nation ’ s ideology will continue in the direction it ’ s already moving .
National elections are now referenda on the current speed at which the nation moves in that direction .
But the direction itself is not up for debate .
Note : The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute .
The Best of Ryan McMaken

Election Day 2020 finally arrived, and it looks like it’s going to be a long process before the official winner is finally determined. There will be lawsuits over which ballots will be counted. Both sides will be accused of fraud and of other misdeeds.
And when it comes down to it, the final outcome will depend on thin margins in several states, and there will be doubts about the honesty of the count in each case.
But no matter what happens, Congress will have to certify and make a final determination as to who received the win in the electoral college. It is quite possible that only then will there be a known and settled winner.
They Predicted a Blue Wave
Instant Vortex Plus Ai... Best Price: $83.99 Buy New $119.99 (as of 06:46 UTC - Details) Of course, none of this was supposed to happen. According to the pollsters, voters would vote in a “blue wave,” with Biden handily winning in countless battleground states, including Florida. In currently disputed states like Wisconsin and Michigan, many pollsters gave Biden an edge of 10 percent or more. The Washington Post/ANB poll in late October had Biden up by 17points. The same poll had Biden up by 7 points in both Michigan and Pennsylvania. Lindsey Graham was supposed to lose his seat in South Carolina.
In reality, Republicans look to maintain control of the Senate. The Republicans also picked up seats in the House of Representatives. From the Democratic Party’s perspective, they clearly “underperformed,” and Glenn Greenwald summed it up this morning, stating:
You have an incumbent President with a massive recession, an unemployment, rent and foreclosure crisis, and an out-of-control pandemic, and this is what the Democrats are able to do with it….Assuming that Biden ekes out a victory, that the Democrats managed to *lose* seats in the House with everything going on might be the most shocking and pathetic part of what happened.
But Democratic underperformance doesn’t mean Trump did well. He did manage to build on much of his 2016 support among women and nonwhites. He did worse with white men. Moreover, in some parts of the country, he did much better with Hispanics. Nor are we just talking about Cubans, who have long leaned Republican in many election years. As the Gravel Institute noted today: “Zapata County, Texas is the second most Hispanic county in America. In 2012, Obama won it by 43 points. In 2016, Hillary won it by 33 points. In 2020, Biden lost it by 5 points. What a disaster.”
This all gives hints as to where electoral trends might be heading in the future.
The Ruling Party Has No Mandate
But for now, the fact remains that this election has produced a result where it is abundantly clear that half of the electorate voted to oust the other half. At least among those who vote, it’s pretty clear the United States is in the midst of a 51 to 49 percent split. And this isn’t just at the national level. A great many states are evenly split as well. GoWISE USA 1700-Watt 5... Buy New $79.99 (as of 06:46 UTC - Details)
At this point it would be absurd for the winner to claim—as he is likely to do—that he will get down to doing “the people’s work” or that he wants to accomplish the mandate the voters gave him. What mandate? Even in a lopsided election, it’s never clear why the voters voted the way they did, and it’s impossible to therefore translate “the will of the voters” into policy.
That’s all the more obvious now, given the clear half-and-half division that’s now in place. In other words, all the usual tired bromides about democratic elections should be more clear than ever. There is no ”will of the majority.” The winner doesn’t represent “the nation.” There is no consensus. We’re not coming together “as a people.” These tired slogans should now strike every intelligent person as nonsense uttered only by pundits and politicians desperate to claim some sort of legitimacy for a ruling cadre that has clearly been rejected by approximately half the country.
The Nation Continues to Creep Left
The bad news lies largely in what isn’t being discussed. The US’s unsustainable fiscal policy was never a significant election issue. There was no discussion over healthcare. That’s all just assumed to be a matter for government regulation and control. In spite of what the anti-Trump commentators say, Donald Trump has never been “far right” or a candidate who pushes anything resembling laissez-faire. Rather, he is a centrist candidate who has pushed new gun controls, signed off on massive amounts of new fiscal spending and debt, and in the early days of the covid-19 panic actually empowered the most hysterical “experts” supporting nationwide lockdowns. Far from taking a principled decentralist or profreedom position, Trump did next to nothing to oppose what David Stockman calls “the overnight lurch into the inherently unconstitutional and destructive regime of economic martial law that enveloped the nation within days.” Trump’s inaction was mostly a deer-in-the-headlights reaction which had no grounding in any ideology—least of all a “right-wing” one— and also allowed the lockdowners to control the narrative for months.
Meanwhile, the Democrats ran on a solidly leftist platform pushing a Green New Deal, a “Great Reset,” and nationwide lockdowns, all while adopting and expanding Trump’s embrace of the bottomless abyss of government deficits. New House Kitchen Digi... Buy New $74.99 (as of 06:46 UTC - Details)
An overwhelming Trump victory would have provided little more than a tap on the brakes against the current Biden proposals. Clearly, not even that will happen.
But why should we expect anything other than a continued path down the road of center-left policy at varying speeds? Regardless of how the Democrats perform in 2020, the Left has a lock on the public schools, the universities, the news media, and social media. The fact that Trump supporters can be called “right wing” is an indication of how far the nation’s ideology has moved to the left in recent decades.
Until dissenters from the zeitgeist can assert far greater control through cultural institutions, publications, and schools, the nation’s ideology will continue in the direction it’s already moving. National elections are now referenda on the current speed at which the nation moves in that direction. But the direction itself is not up for debate.
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
The Best of Ryan McMaken


lewrockwell--2020-11-05--The Government’s Lust To Spy

The Government’s Lust To Spy

In 2019 , agents of the federal and state governments persuaded judges to issue 99 % of all requested intercepts .
An intercept is any type of government surveillance — telephone , text message , email , even in-person .
These are intercepts that theoretically are based on probable cause of crime , as is required by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution .
The 2019 numbers — which the government released as we were all watching the end of the presidential election campaign — are staggering .
The feds , and local and state police in America engaged in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrested 17,101 people from among those intercepted and obtained convictions on the basis of evidence obtained via the intercepts on 5,304 .
That is a conviction rate of 4 % of all people spied upon by law enforcement in the United States .
Here is the backstory .
It Is Dangerous to Be ... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price : $ 1.10 Buy New $ 5.51 Readers of this column are familiar with the use by federal agents of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to obtain intercepts using a standard of proof considerably @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That came about because Congress basically has no respect for the Constitution and authorized the FISA Court to issue intercept warrants if federal agents can identify an American or a foreign person in America who has spoken to a foreign person in another country .
Call your cousin in Florence or a bookseller in Edinburgh or an art dealer in Brussels , and under FISA , the feds can get a warrant from the FISA Court to monitor your future calls and texts and emails .
This FISA system is profoundly unconstitutional ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government — state and federal — can only lawfully engage in searches and seizures pursuant to warrants issued by a judge based upon a showing under oath of probable cause of crime .
The Supreme Court has ruled consistently that intercepts and surveillances constitute searches and seizures .
The government searches a database of emails , texts or recorded phone calls and seizes the data it wants .
Thus , when the feds have targeted someone for prosecution and lack probable cause of crime about that person , they resort to FISA .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but also it is corrupting , as it permits criminal investigators to cut constitutional corners by obtaining evidence of crimes outside the scope of the Fourth Amendment .
The use of the Fourth Amendment is the only lawful means of engaging in surveillance sufficient to introduce the fruits of the surveillance at a criminal trial .
If the feds happen upon evidence of a crime from their FISA-authorized intercepts , they then need to engage in deceptive acts of parallel construction .
That connotes the false creation of an ostensibly lawful intercept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawfully what they already have obtained unlawfully .
Law enforcement personnel then fake the true means they used to acquire evidence — even duping the prosecutors for whom they work — so the evidence will appear to have been obtained lawfully and thus can be used at trial .
At its essence , parallel construction is a deception on the court .
If the deception is perpetrated under oath , it is perjury — a felony .
This corruption of the Constitution by those in whose hands we have reposed it for safekeeping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FISA-induced corruption has regrettably bled into the culture of non-FISA law enforcement , and even into the judiciary .
The statistics I cited above are not from FISA — those numbers are secret .
Rather , the statistics reflect the government ’ s voracious appetite for spying that now pervades non-FISA law enforcement .
This is so because judges accept uncritically the applications made before them for intercept or surveillance warrants .
Thus , even though the Fourth Amendment permits judges to issue warrants only upon the probable likelihood of evidence of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the person or thing to be seized , the attitude of what constitutes probable cause has been attenuated by both the law enforcement personnel who seek warrants and the judges who hear the applications .
We know this because we have not seen a number like 99 % of all warrant applications — every one supposedly based on probable cause of crime — granted .
Nor have we seen only 4 % of those intercepts resulting in convictions .
Suicide Pact : The Radi ... Napolitano , Andrew P. Best Price : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rational conclusion is that the government ’ s appetite for surveillance remains voracious , and judges — whose affirmative duty it is to uphold the Constitution as against the other two branches of government — have done very little to abate this .
So , what becomes of the remaining 96 % of those on whom the government spied ?
That depends on whether the government charges anyone .
If a person is charged and acquitted , and law enforcement unlawfully obtained evidence against that person , his remedy is either persuading the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the acquittal , or suing the law enforcement agents who unlawfully spied on him .
Yet , under current Supreme Court decisions about who can sue the government , if the government has spied on you and not charged you and not told you , you have no cause of action against the law enforcement agents who did this .
Stated differently , in 2019 , at least 760,739 people in America were spied upon pursuant to judicial orders allegedly based upon probable cause of crime and were neither charged nor informed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ often deride my attacks on those who fail to safeguard our privacy because they argue , we have no privacy .
Yet , as Justice Louis Brandeis wrote , the most comprehensive of rights is the right to be let alone .
If we forget this , my colleagues will have the last laugh .
If we expose its violation , we might know the joys of unmonitored personal fulfillment .
The Best of Andrew P. Napolitano

Shop all books by Judge Napolitano
In 2019, agents of the federal and state governments persuaded judges to issue 99% of all requested intercepts. An intercept is any type of government surveillance — telephone, text message, email, even in-person. These are intercepts that theoretically are based on probable cause of crime, as is required by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.
The 2019 numbers — which the government released as we were all watching the end of the presidential election campaign — are staggering. The feds, and local and state police in America engaged in 27,431,687 intercepts on 777,840 people. They arrested 17,101 people from among those intercepted and obtained convictions on the basis of evidence obtained via the intercepts on 5,304. That is a conviction rate of 4% of all people spied upon by law enforcement in the United States.
Here is the backstory. It Is Dangerous to Be ... Andrew P. Napolitano Best Price: $1.10 Buy New $5.51 (as of 11:50 UTC - Details)
Readers of this column are familiar with the use by federal agents of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to obtain intercepts using a standard of proof considerably lesser than probable cause of crime. That came about because Congress basically has no respect for the Constitution and authorized the FISA Court to issue intercept warrants if federal agents can identify an American or a foreign person in America who has spoken to a foreign person in another country.
Call your cousin in Florence or a bookseller in Edinburgh or an art dealer in Brussels, and under FISA, the feds can get a warrant from the FISA Court to monitor your future calls and texts and emails.
This FISA system is profoundly unconstitutional; the Fourth Amendment expressly requires that the government — state and federal — can only lawfully engage in searches and seizures pursuant to warrants issued by a judge based upon a showing under oath of probable cause of crime. The Supreme Court has ruled consistently that intercepts and surveillances constitute searches and seizures. The government searches a database of emails, texts or recorded phone calls and seizes the data it wants.
Thus, when the feds have targeted someone for prosecution and lack probable cause of crime about that person, they resort to FISA. This is not only unlawful and unconstitutional, but also it is corrupting, as it permits criminal investigators to cut constitutional corners by obtaining evidence of crimes outside the scope of the Fourth Amendment. The use of the Fourth Amendment is the only lawful means of engaging in surveillance sufficient to introduce the fruits of the surveillance at a criminal trial.
If the feds happen upon evidence of a crime from their FISA-authorized intercepts, they then need to engage in deceptive acts of parallel construction. That connotes the false creation of an ostensibly lawful intercept in order to claim that they obtained lawfully what they already have obtained unlawfully.
Law enforcement personnel then fake the true means they used to acquire evidence — even duping the prosecutors for whom they work — so the evidence will appear to have been obtained lawfully and thus can be used at trial. At its essence, parallel construction is a deception on the court. If the deception is perpetrated under oath, it is perjury — a felony.
This corruption of the Constitution by those in whose hands we have reposed it for safekeeping happens every day in America.
The FISA-induced corruption has regrettably bled into the culture of non-FISA law enforcement, and even into the judiciary. The statistics I cited above are not from FISA — those numbers are secret. Rather, the statistics reflect the government’s voracious appetite for spying that now pervades non-FISA law enforcement. This is so because judges accept uncritically the applications made before them for intercept or surveillance warrants.
Thus, even though the Fourth Amendment permits judges to issue warrants only upon the probable likelihood of evidence of a crime in the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized, the attitude of what constitutes probable cause has been attenuated by both the law enforcement personnel who seek warrants and the judges who hear the applications. We know this because we have not seen a number like 99% of all warrant applications — every one supposedly based on probable cause of crime — granted. Nor have we seen only 4% of those intercepts resulting in convictions. Suicide Pact: The Radi... Napolitano, Andrew P. Best Price: $0.25 Buy New $2.84 (as of 04:15 UTC - Details)
The rational conclusion is that the government’s appetite for surveillance remains voracious, and judges — whose affirmative duty it is to uphold the Constitution as against the other two branches of government — have done very little to abate this.
So, what becomes of the remaining 96% of those on whom the government spied? That depends on whether the government charges anyone. If a person is charged and acquitted, and law enforcement unlawfully obtained evidence against that person, his remedy is either persuading the court to suppress the evidence thus resulting in the acquittal, or suing the law enforcement agents who unlawfully spied on him.
Yet, under current Supreme Court decisions about who can sue the government, if the government has spied on you and not charged you and not told you, you have no cause of action against the law enforcement agents who did this.
Stated differently, in 2019, at least 760,739 people in America were spied upon pursuant to judicial orders allegedly based upon probable cause of crime and were neither charged nor informed of the spying.
My Fox colleagues often deride my attacks on those who fail to safeguard our privacy because they argue, we have no privacy. Yet, as Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, the most comprehensive of rights is the right to be let alone. If we forget this, my colleagues will have the last laugh. If we expose its violation, we might know the joys of unmonitored personal fulfillment.
Reprinted with the author’s permission.
The Best of Andrew P. Napolitano


lewrockwell--2020-11-05--Criminal NY Governor Declares New Fascist Covid Rules

Face it , if the NY governor hadn ’ t been born into the family of Cuomo , if his father hadn ’ t been the governor of NY , he ’ d have emigrated to China where he ’ d be sweeping streets for a living .
In Beijing , he ’ d be under 24-hour surveillance as a crazy man who might go off and do something bizarre and harmful .
Chinese security man staring at a screen : “ Who ’ s that idiot on the corner poking people with his broom ?
’ Colleague : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the American .
He loves our system .
He moved here a few years ago .
We ’ ll leave him alone for now .
He ’ s good press for us .
We can say , ‘ See , that ’ s what Americans are like.
’ ” NY Governor Andrew Cuomo is presiding over the lockdown death of his state , and of NY City .
Many of his rich citizens are bailing out of NY with their tax money and moving to Montana and other points west and south .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ tourist dollars , will be collecting so few taxes they wouldn ’ t fill a single garbage pail on a desolate boarded-up city street .
I Do Not Consent : My F ... Gold MD , JD , Simone Buy New $ 12.99 NY , another Democrat share-and-care-and-love state , is hitting new highs on boot-clicking and saluting and fascist clampdowns .
The NY Post has the story : “ Most people who visit New York will have to quarantine for three days and then prove they are negative for COVID-19 before they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business , ’ Gov .
Andrew Cuomo announced Saturday.
” “ Now , travelers must show proof of a negative test taken within three days of arriving in the Empire State , and must also quarantine for three more days — and get a new COVID-19 test on the fourth.
” “ If that ’ s positive , they must isolate for two weeks , the governor said at an Albany press briefing.
” “ ’ Four days plus three days is seven days , and that ’ s basically , by all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cuomo said , as he announced 2,049 new cases across the state and 8 deaths reported yesterday.
” COVID Operation : What ... Prier , Shane D Best Price : $ 26.63 Buy New $ 19.99 “ Anyone who refuses to be tested must quarantine for 14 days.
” “ New Yorkers who return home within a day of leaving must take a test within four days of their arrival , Cuomo said .
But if they are gone longer for 24 hours , then the new rules apply.
” “ Those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not required to be tested each trip , he noted.
” He noted , he declared , he announced , he ordered .
Achtung !
What if my first two tests are indeterminate and the third test is negative but the fourth test is weakly positive and the fifth test is definitely negative but the sixth test is positive ?
Do I stay in quarantine in a fleabag hotel for three weeks or six weeks or a year ?
What if I start seeing cockroaches from the sixth dimension invading my baloney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ghostbusters ?
I thought I was just taking a cheap flight to the City to see the Empire State Building and Central Park .
I didn ’ t realize I ’ d be marked as a political prisoner .
Do I get one call to a lawyer ?
COVID-19 : Lockdowns on ... Betrus , Michael Buy New $ 16.99 Damn , the Democrats missed their golden chance .
They should have run Cuomo for president instead of old crazy Joe .
Cuomo would show the country what law and order really looks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the White House , he ’ d have checkpoints on every interstate highway in the land .
He ’ d bring in Chinese and Australian and UK cops to man them .
“ Sir , get out of the car and show us your proof of a negative PCR test taken within the past 48 hours .
Open your trunk .
Empty your pockets .
Are you carrying cash ?
We ’ ll take it .
We have to test it for the virus .
You ’ ll get it back within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cell phone ?
We need to transfer all the data to our center in Utah .
Write down a list of your 50 closest contacts .
Lying is a federal offense .
Look straight at me .
I ’ m taking your photo… ” Congratulations , New York .
You elected an empty name , Cuomo , as your governor , in your Billy Joel New York State of Mind .
Wake up and smell the slavery .
Suck it in through your masks .
The Best of Jon Rappoport

Face it, if the NY governor hadn’t been born into the family of Cuomo, if his father hadn’t been the governor of NY, he’d have emigrated to China where he’d be sweeping streets for a living. In Beijing, he’d be under 24-hour surveillance as a crazy man who might go off and do something bizarre and harmful.
Chinese security man staring at a screen: “Who’s that idiot on the corner poking people with his broom?’
Colleague: “Oh, that’s Cuomo, the American. He loves our system. He moved here a few years ago. We’ll leave him alone for now. He’s good press for us. We can say, ‘See, that’s what Americans are like.’”
NY Governor Andrew Cuomo is presiding over the lockdown death of his state, and of NY City. Many of his rich citizens are bailing out of NY with their tax money and moving to Montana and other points west and south. Soon, NY, minus billions in tourist dollars, will be collecting so few taxes they wouldn’t fill a single garbage pail on a desolate boarded-up city street. I Do Not Consent: My F... Gold MD, JD, Simone Buy New $12.99 (as of 05:07 UTC - Details)
NY, another Democrat share-and-care-and-love state, is hitting new highs on boot-clicking and saluting and fascist clampdowns.
The NY Post has the story:
“Most people who visit New York will have to quarantine for three days and then prove they are negative for COVID-19 before they are ‘free to go about their business,’ Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced Saturday.”
“Now, travelers must show proof of a negative test taken within three days of arriving in the Empire State, and must also quarantine for three more days — and get a new COVID-19 test on the fourth.”
“If that’s positive, they must isolate for two weeks, the governor said at an Albany press briefing.”
“’Four days plus three days is seven days, and that’s basically, by all probability, the incubation period,’ Cuomo said, as he announced 2,049 new cases across the state and 8 deaths reported yesterday.” COVID Operation: What ... Prier, Shane D Best Price: $26.63 Buy New $19.99 (as of 06:48 UTC - Details)
“Anyone who refuses to be tested must quarantine for 14 days.”
“New Yorkers who return home within a day of leaving must take a test within four days of their arrival, Cuomo said. But if they are gone longer for 24 hours, then the new rules apply.”
“Those who commute to New York between bordering states are not required to be tested each trip, he noted.”
He noted, he declared, he announced, he ordered. Achtung!
What if my first two tests are indeterminate and the third test is negative but the fourth test is weakly positive and the fifth test is definitely negative but the sixth test is positive? Do I stay in quarantine in a fleabag hotel for three weeks or six weeks or a year? What if I start seeing cockroaches from the sixth dimension invading my baloney sandwich? Who do I call? Ghostbusters? I thought I was just taking a cheap flight to the City to see the Empire State Building and Central Park. I didn’t realize I’d be marked as a political prisoner. Do I get one call to a lawyer? COVID-19: Lockdowns on... Betrus, Michael Buy New $16.99 (as of 03:38 UTC - Details)
Damn, the Democrats missed their golden chance. They should have run Cuomo for president instead of old crazy Joe. Cuomo would show the country what law and order really looks like.
Within 24 hours of taking over the White House, he’d have checkpoints on every interstate highway in the land. He’d bring in Chinese and Australian and UK cops to man them.
“Sir, get out of the car and show us your proof of a negative PCR test taken within the past 48 hours. Open your trunk. Empty your pockets. Are you carrying cash? We’ll take it. We have to test it for the virus. You’ll get it back within two weeks. Where’s your cell phone? We need to transfer all the data to our center in Utah. Write down a list of your 50 closest contacts. Lying is a federal offense. Look straight at me. I’m taking your photo…”
Congratulations, New York. You elected an empty name, Cuomo, as your governor, in your Billy Joel New York State of Mind.
Wake up and smell the slavery. Suck it in through your masks.
Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
The Best of Jon Rappoport