lewrockwell--2020-11-12--Covid-19: a Precursor to a ‘New World Order?’ aka ‘The Great Reset

What does the “ New World Order ” refer to ?
It refers to the idea that many crises ’ are manufactured by powerful groups of people in order to justify a more heightened national security state .
While some might view this as an unfounded conspiracy theory , a more nuanced approach is necessary .
Many world leaders have spoken about a ‘ new world order ’ on multiple occasions , pointing to greater global collaboration , control and surveillance to pull it all off .
It ’ s an agenda of greater centralized power for those already in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heightened national security state in our current times includes more surveillance and data acquisition , using more methods for tracking the general population , their actions , intentions , and even their currency .
Again , it ’ s no conspiracy theory , Edward Snowden made it quite clear that the NSA was tracking US citizens all along , illegally , without their permission , and they even denied doing this under oath .
Given that , to think that any government institution or politician will come out and be honest about their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already know the lengths some have gone to cover up these projects .
Battle Hymn : Revelatio ... Phillips , Dane Best Price : $ 13.45 Buy New $ 14.95 This article will examine the use of continuous ‘ threats , ’ sometimes manufactured to impose more security measures on the population , what the “ Great Reset ” is , and why it ’ s important to recognize the measures taken by those who claim this is a step towards more authoritarianism .
It ’ s time to truly begin having serious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ learning to empathize with differing positions on them .
The need for collective sensemaking is at an all-time high , and if we are constantly divided and unable to perceive reality from the perspective of anybody else , we are going to struggle to create meaningful change .
This is both a time to consume information and to develop ourselves personally to become effective changemakers .
The Focus on Problems or Threats The justifications used to bring about this new world are often continuous threats such as climate change , disease outbreaks like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terrorism etc , and measures taken against these things are marketed as necessary for our protection and well being .
As a result of this marketing , we are slowly being conditioned to view our freedom as selfish and harmful to others .
This is a whole conversation on it ’ s own , but for now we ’ ll stop here .
Many , especially so called “ fact-checkers ” brush off the idea of some form of ‘ increase in centralized power ’ or ‘ new order ’ as a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has plenty of legitimacy .
This type of legitimacy has gained even more traction thanks to people like Julian Assange , Edward Snowden and William Binney .
Binney and Snowden , both NSA whistleblowers have spoken at large about threat propaganda multiple times .
Obviously , this isn ’ t covered by mainstream media and anybody who does give a voice to people like Snowden and Binney seem to be subjected to censorship by social media platforms .
People like Assange , who is on the brink of death in a UK prison @ @ @ @ @ @ @ traitors or a danger to society , while Edward Snowden lives in exile .
Pawns in the Game , FBI ... Carr , William Guy Best Price : $ 22.84 Buy New $ 18.95 A great quote comes to mind from Nils Melzer , Human Rights Chair of the Geneva Academy of Int Humanitarian Law and Human Rights , Prof of Int Law at the University of Glasgow , and UN Rapporteur on Torture and Other Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment .
I ’ ve used it before .
Snowden has spoken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Coronavirus is being used , like the threat of terrorism , to impose more overreaching control measures on the human population .
William Binney has relayed the idea that the NSA is not interested in protecting us and our freedoms , but rather “ total population control.
” This type of censorship happens on all scales at various levels , we here at Collective Evolution have experienced it with demonetization and the loss of our ability to post on our Facebook page of 5.5 million followers , and people like Joe Rogan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controversial ’ topics .
It feels as though Freedom of speech has never been so threatened , and yet we are in a critical time where it is greatly needed .
It ’ s not just credible whistleblowers we should be listening to , there are actual real world examples , data and evidence .
When it comes to the coronavirus for example , multiple renowned medical doctors and professors from around the world continually relay their strong opinion that we are dealing with something far less dangerous than what is being presented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ par with the flu , or no more dangerous than other respiratory viruses that already infect hundreds of millions and kill tens of millions a year .
45,000 doctors and scientists have now signed The Great Barrington Declaration strongly imposing lockdown measures , and some of the most reputable scientists in the field have been sharing the same information while being completely ignored , censored and “ fact-checked.
” Coupled with this type of censorship comes a massive amount of mainstream media coverage around the world , constantly beaming out the exact opposite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it along the way .
Government scientists are given the spotlight while all others , who seem to be in the majority , seem to be muzzled .
Strange times indeed .
Post Corona : From Cris ... Galloway , Scott Buy New $ 25.00 It ’ s a shame that science has become so politicized , used , and manipulated to possibly help push forth this “ New World Order ” or greater centralized power and mass surveillance .
As with COVID-19 , “ false flag terrorism , ” the idea that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , fund , and arm terrorist organizations like ‘ ISIS ’ and ‘ Al-Qaeda ’ comes with an abundance of evidence .
That ’ s why Congresswoman and military veteran Tulsi Gabbard introduced the “ Stop Arming Terrorist ” act , because this DOES happen .
9/11 was a great example used to justify the invasion of Iraq .
These events seem to be used in an attempt to invade under the guise of good-will .
Again , this is a narrative that is threatening to powerful interests , which is why it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time it does happen to make its way into the mainstream .
What is “ The Great Reset ?
” It ’ s an initiative that was started by the World Economic Forum .
The House of Windsor , and the UN are prime executive co-producers .
Top sponsors include BP , Mastercard and Microsoft .
According to them , They go on to explain all of the “ disrupts ” we are facing is “ changing the traditional context for decision making .
The inconsistencies , inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and education – are more exposed tan ever amidst a global context of concern for lives , livelihoods and the planet.
” Schwab ’ s message was amplified by Prince Charles when he said : All of this requires changes in human behaviour .
Behaviour modification , if you will .
This , according to many , is authoritarianism under the guise of good will and will no doubt include measures being placed upon the citizenry at the expense of our freedoms .
We are currently living in it , and we are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Great Reset.
” We are also experiencing a great divide amongst the citizenry , there are many who believe in these pushes for change having been made to believe they are necessary and for the common good , and then there are others who believe it ’ s simply a step towards a more authoritarian human experience .
The former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America and Vatican insider , Carlo Maria Viganò , for example , recently wrote a letter to Donald Trump .
In it , he mentions The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Great Reset is underway .
Its architect is a global élite that wants to subdue all of humanity , imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations .
In several nations this plan has already been approved and financed ; in others it is still in an early stage .
Behind the world leaders who are the accomplices and executors of this infernal project , there are unscrupulous characters who finance the World Economic Forum and Event 201 , promoting their agenda .
The purpose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures , hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and cancelling individual debt .
The price of these concessions from the International Monetary Fund will be the renunciation of private property and adherence to a program of vaccination against Covid-19 and Covid-21 promoted by Bill Gates with the collaboration of the main pharmaceutical groups .
Beyond the enormous economic interests that motivate the promoters of the Great Reset , the imposition of the vaccination will be accompanied by the requirement of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with the consequent contact tracing of the population of the entire world .
Those who do not accept these measures will be confined in detention camps or placed under house arrest , and all their assets will be confiscated .
You can access and read the entire letter here .
According to Ellen Brown , an attorney and chair of the Public Banking Institute : The Takeaway : It ’ s Time To Think More Deeply Not to oversimplify but , around 50 percent of Americans believe those who voted for Donald @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The other half who voted for Trump and feel the other side is evil and stealing the election .
Faith in institutions is crumbling , and there is good reason for this .
It isn ’ t simply the doubt sewn from loud voices like Trump or his supporters , it comes from years of now evidential lies , deceit and a deep calling for meaningful change .
The election is one of many examples , along with COVID-19 , that shows how separated people are not only in America , but all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a collective narrative founded on a basic idea that we are separate from one another , and thus our world gives us this reality .
What many of us call authoritarian measures are not really forced upon the population as we might think .
There is a great deal of people who see and believe the value of more security , digital currencies , more tracking etc , and they feel they will be safer with it all .
Is this story true ?
That ’ s for you to decide , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the bigger conversation we must have .
There are always justifications in the minds of people who oppose what you or I may believe .
This requires dialogue , not ridicule , it requires understanding and it requires people to empathize and understand each other , and where we are all coming from .
These days , it ’ s not just knowing information and facts that will create change , it ’ s changing ourselves , how we go about communicating and re-assessing the underlying stories , ideas and beliefs that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ practice these things if we truly want to change .
It ’ s more important than what we know , because ultimately if we can ’ t treat each other like we want to be treated , we are not going to get anywhere .
As much as we point our finger to the global elite and authoritarian government measures , which are happening , real change comes from educating ourselves , awakening to a deeper understanding as to who we are , treating everybody with respect , and having dialogue with those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we have to begin asking ourselves why we get so triggered the way we do .
The deep change we all know is possible on this planet will be created from a different state of consciousness .
One we must foster and develope .
Playing the blame game , at a deeper level , doesn ’ t do much .
That being said , it ’ s an important step to ask why our world is the way it is and identify issues we face , especially ones that are put in place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lot of people .
It doesn ’ t matter so much whether or not we agree that something like The Great Reset is planned conspiracy , it ’ s more important to deeply ask ‘ is this the world we truly want to create ?
Is this what we are limited to creating , and if not , what holds us back ?
What power would we have if as a collective to come together and do something ?
If we don ’ t want people who don ’ t truly represent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then we have to wake up and realize that it ’ s not them who has to change , it ’ s us .
If you ’ re feeling called to become a more effective changemaker in this critical time , consider becoming a member of CETV where this is the main focus of our conversations , original shows , and courses .

What does the “New World Order” refer to? It refers to the idea that many crises’ are manufactured by powerful groups of people in order to justify a more heightened national security state. While some might view this as an unfounded conspiracy theory, a more nuanced approach is necessary. Many world leaders have spoken about a ‘new world order’ on multiple occasions, pointing to greater global collaboration, control and surveillance to pull it all off. It’s an agenda of greater centralized power for those already in great positions of unelected power.
A heightened national security state in our current times includes more surveillance and data acquisition, using more methods for tracking the general population, their actions, intentions, and even their currency. Again, it’s no conspiracy theory, Edward Snowden made it quite clear that the NSA was tracking US citizens all along, illegally, without their permission, and they even denied doing this under oath.
Given that, to think that any government institution or politician will come out and be honest about their real plans would be silly, we already know the lengths some have gone to cover up these projects. Battle Hymn: Revelatio... Phillips, Dane Best Price: $13.45 Buy New $14.95 (as of 08:39 UTC - Details)
This article will examine the use of continuous ‘threats,’ sometimes manufactured to impose more security measures on the population, what the “Great Reset” is, and why it’s important to recognize the measures taken by those who claim this is a step towards more authoritarianism.
It’s time to truly begin having serious conversations about these controversial topics, and learning to empathize with differing positions on them. The need for collective sensemaking is at an all-time high, and if we are constantly divided and unable to perceive reality from the perspective of anybody else, we are going to struggle to create meaningful change. This is both a time to consume information and to develop ourselves personally to become effective changemakers.
The Focus on Problems or Threats
The justifications used to bring about this new world are often continuous threats such as climate change, disease outbreaks like what we are experiencing with COVID-19, terrorism etc, and measures taken against these things are marketed as necessary for our protection and well being. As a result of this marketing, we are slowly being conditioned to view our freedom as selfish and harmful to others. This is a whole conversation on it’s own, but for now we’ll stop here.
Many, especially so called “fact-checkers” brush off the idea of some form of ‘increase in centralized power’ or ‘new order’ as a “conspiracy theory,” but the idea has plenty of legitimacy. This type of legitimacy has gained even more traction thanks to people like Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and William Binney.
Binney and Snowden, both NSA whistleblowers have spoken at large about threat propaganda multiple times. Obviously, this isn’t covered by mainstream media and anybody who does give a voice to people like Snowden and Binney seem to be subjected to censorship by social media platforms. People like Assange, who is on the brink of death in a UK prison awaiting US extradition, are branded as traitors or a danger to society, while Edward Snowden lives in exile.
Pawns in the Game, FBI... Carr, William Guy Best Price: $22.84 Buy New $18.95 (as of 08:39 UTC - Details) A great quote comes to mind from Nils Melzer, Human Rights Chair of the Geneva Academy of Int Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, Prof of Int Law at the University of Glasgow, and UN Rapporteur on Torture and Other Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. I’ve used it before.
“How far have we sunk if telling the truth becomes a crime? How far have we sunk if we prosecute people that expose war crimes for exposing war crimes? How far have we sunk when we no longer prosecute our own war criminals? Because we identify more with them, than we identify with the people that actually expose these crimes. What does that tell about us and about our governments? In a democracy, the power does not belong to the government, but to the people. But the people have to claim it. Secrecy disempowers the people because it prevents them from exercising democratic control, which is precisely why governments want secrecy.”
Snowden has spoken about many threats, recently emphasizing that the Coronavirus is being used, like the threat of terrorism, to impose more overreaching control measures on the human population. William Binney has relayed the idea that the NSA is not interested in protecting us and our freedoms, but rather “total population control.”
This type of censorship happens on all scales at various levels, we here at Collective Evolution have experienced it with demonetization and the loss of our ability to post on our Facebook page of 5.5 million followers, and people like Joe Rogan have experienced it for simply discussing ‘controversial’ topics.
It feels as though Freedom of speech has never been so threatened, and yet we are in a critical time where it is greatly needed.
It’s not just credible whistleblowers we should be listening to, there are actual real world examples, data and evidence. When it comes to the coronavirus for example, multiple renowned medical doctors and professors from around the world continually relay their strong opinion that we are dealing with something far less dangerous than what is being presented, and that it is perhaps on par with the flu, or no more dangerous than other respiratory viruses that already infect hundreds of millions and kill tens of millions a year. 45,000 doctors and scientists have now signed The Great Barrington Declaration strongly imposing lockdown measures, and some of the most reputable scientists in the field have been sharing the same information while being completely ignored, censored and “fact-checked.”
Coupled with this type of censorship comes a massive amount of mainstream media coverage around the world, constantly beaming out the exact opposite narrative to alternative media, and ridiculing it along the way. Government scientists are given the spotlight while all others, who seem to be in the majority, seem to be muzzled.
Strange times indeed. Post Corona: From Cris... Galloway, Scott Buy New $25.00 (as of 08:39 UTC - Details)
It’s a shame that science has become so politicized, used, and manipulated to possibly help push forth this “New World Order” or greater centralized power and mass surveillance.
As with COVID-19, “false flag terrorism,” the idea that ‘the powers that be’ create, fund, and arm terrorist organizations like ‘ISIS’ and ‘Al-Qaeda’ comes with an abundance of evidence. That’s why Congresswoman and military veteran Tulsi Gabbard introduced the “Stop Arming Terrorist” act, because this DOES happen. 9/11 was a great example used to justify the invasion of Iraq. These events seem to be used in an attempt to invade under the guise of good-will. Again, this is a narrative that is threatening to powerful interests, which is why it’s usually ridiculed and downplayed any time it does happen to make its way into the mainstream.
“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any informed intelligence officer know this. But, there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism.” – Robin Cook, Former British Foreign Secretary. “The statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception.” – Mark Twain (source)
The Great Reset
What is “The Great Reset?” It’s an initiative that was started by the World Economic Forum. The House of Windsor, and the UN are prime executive co-producers. Top sponsors include BP, Mastercard and Microsoft. According to them,
There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.
They go on to explain all of the “disrupts” we are facing is “changing the traditional context for decision making. The inconsistencies, inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems – from health and financial to energy and education – are more exposed tan ever amidst a global context of concern for lives, livelihoods and the planet.”
COVID and all other crises’ we face, according to the World Economic Forum, …shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons. Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities, the Great Reset initiative has a set of dimensions to build a new social contract that honours the dignity of every human being.
WEF founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab said:
“the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions… Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”
Schwab’s message was amplified by Prince Charles when he said:
“We have a golden opportunity to seize something good from this [COVID-19] crisis. Its unprecedented shockwaves may well make people more receptive to big visions of change.”
Jennifer Morgan (current head of Greenpeace) stated:
“We set up a new world order after World War II… We’re now in a different world than we were then. We need to ask, what can we be doing differently? The World Economic Forum has a big responsibility in that as well—to be pushing the reset button and looking at how to create well-being for people and for the Earth.”
All of this requires changes in human behaviour. Behaviour modification, if you will.
This, according to many, is authoritarianism under the guise of good will and will no doubt include measures being placed upon the citizenry at the expense of our freedoms. We are currently living in it, and we are currently experiencing the beginning of “The Great Reset.”
We are also experiencing a great divide amongst the citizenry, there are many who believe in these pushes for change having been made to believe they are necessary and for the common good, and then there are others who believe it’s simply a step towards a more authoritarian human experience.
The former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America and Vatican insider, Carlo Maria Viganò, for example, recently wrote a letter to Donald Trump. In it, he mentions The Great Reset.
A global plan called the Great Reset is underway. Its architect is a global élite that wants to subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations. In several nations this plan has already been approved and financed; in others it is still in an early stage. Behind the world leaders who are the accomplices and executors of this infernal project, there are unscrupulous characters who finance the World Economic Forum and Event 201, promoting their agenda. The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and cancelling individual debt. The price of these concessions from the International Monetary Fund will be the renunciation of private property and adherence to a program of vaccination against Covid-19 and Covid-21 promoted by Bill Gates with the collaboration of the main pharmaceutical groups. Beyond the enormous economic interests that motivate the promoters of the Great Reset, the imposition of the vaccination will be accompanied by the requirement of a health passport and a digital ID, with the consequent contact tracing of the population of the entire world. Those who do not accept these measures will be confined in detention camps or placed under house arrest, and all their assets will be confiscated.
You can access and read the entire letter here.
According to Ellen Brown, an attorney and chair of the Public Banking Institute:
“No country will be allowed to opt out because it would be endangering the rest…Who is behind the Great Reset and what it really entails are major questions that need their own article, but suffice it to say here that to escape the trap of the globalist agenda, we need a mass awakening to what is really going on and collective resistance to it while there is still time. There are hopeful signs that this is happening, including massive protests against economic shutdowns and restrictions, particularly in Europe; a rash of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the lockdowns and of police power overreach; and a flood of alternative media exposés despite widespread censorship. Life as we know it will change. We need to ensure that it changes in ways that serve the people and the productive economy, while preserving our national sovereignty and hard-won personal freedoms.”
The Takeaway: It’s Time To Think More Deeply
Not to oversimplify but, around 50 percent of Americans believe those who voted for Donald Trump are dumb and perhaps racist. The other half who voted for Trump and feel the other side is evil and stealing the election. Faith in institutions is crumbling, and there is good reason for this. It isn’t simply the doubt sewn from loud voices like Trump or his supporters, it comes from years of now evidential lies, deceit and a deep calling for meaningful change.
The election is one of many examples, along with COVID-19, that shows how separated people are not only in America, but all over the world. We live in a collective narrative founded on a basic idea that we are separate from one another, and thus our world gives us this reality. What many of us call authoritarian measures are not really forced upon the population as we might think. There is a great deal of people who see and believe the value of more security, digital currencies, more tracking etc, and they feel they will be safer with it all. Is this story true? That’s for you to decide, but exploring WHY we agree to these things is the bigger conversation we must have.
There are always justifications in the minds of people who oppose what you or I may believe. This requires dialogue, not ridicule, it requires understanding and it requires people to empathize and understand each other, and where we are all coming from.
These days, it’s not just knowing information and facts that will create change, it’s changing ourselves, how we go about communicating and re-assessing the underlying stories, ideas and beliefs that form our world. We have to practice these things if we truly want to change. It’s more important than what we know, because ultimately if we can’t treat each other like we want to be treated, we are not going to get anywhere.
As much as we point our finger to the global elite and authoritarian government measures, which are happening, real change comes from educating ourselves, awakening to a deeper understanding as to who we are, treating everybody with respect, and having dialogue with those who disagree with us. Further, we have to begin asking ourselves why we get so triggered the way we do.
The deep change we all know is possible on this planet will be created from a different state of consciousness. One we must foster and develope. Playing the blame game, at a deeper level, doesn’t do much. That being said, it’s an important step to ask why our world is the way it is and identify issues we face, especially ones that are put in place by governments that do not resonate with a lot of people.
It doesn’t matter so much whether or not we agree that something like The Great Reset is planned conspiracy, it’s more important to deeply ask ‘is this the world we truly want to create? Is this what we are limited to creating, and if not, what holds us back? What power would we have if as a collective to come together and do something?
If we don’t want people who don’t truly represent us to have tremendous amounts of power, then we have to wake up and realize that it’s not them who has to change, it’s us.
If you’re feeling called to become a more effective changemaker in this critical time, consider becoming a member of CETV where this is the main focus of our conversations, original shows, and courses.
Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.


lewrockwell--2020-11-12--Americans Didn’t Vote Against Trump, They Voted Against More Media Psychological Abuse

The word “ coup ” is being thrown about in American liberal media today , not because US liberals suddenly became uncomfortable with the fact that their nation constantly stages coups and topples governments around the world as a matter of routine policy , but because they are all talking about ( you guessed it ) Donald Trump .
To be clear , none of the high-powered influencers who have been promoting the use of this word actually believe there is any possibility that Donald Trump will somehow remain in office after January of next year when he loses his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the election , which would be the thing that a coup is .
There is no means or institutional support through which the sitting president could accomplish such a thing .
This is not a coup , it ’ s a glorified temper tantrum .
Trump will leave office at the appointed time .
The establishment narrative managers are not terrifying their audiences with this word because they believe there is any danger of a coup actually happening .
They are doing it because it ’ s their last chance to use Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Last year the Pacific Standard published a report on “ Trump Anxiety Disorder ” or “ Trump Hypersensitive Unexplained Disorder , ” which it describes as follows : Poems For Rebels Foley , Timothy P Buy New $ 11.00 As the possibility of a Hillary Clinton victory began to slip away—and the possibility of a Donald Trump presidency became more and more certain—the contours of the new age of American anxiety began to take shape .
In a 2017 column , Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank described this phenomenon as “ Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Headaches .
Fainting .
Irregular heartbeat .
Chronic neck pain .
Depression .
Irritable bowel syndrome .
Tightness in the chest .
Shortness of breath .
Teeth grinding .
Stomach ulcer .
Indigestion .
Shingles .
Eye twitching .
Nausea .
Irritability .
High blood sugar .
Tinnitus .
Reduced immunity .
Racing pulse .
Shaking limbs .
Hair loss .
Acid reflux .
Deteriorating vision .
Stroke .
Heart attack .
It was a veritable organ recital .
Two years later , the physiological effects of the Trump administration aren ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ research has tracked the detrimental impacts of Trump-related stress on broad segments of the American population , from young adults to women , to racial and LGBT communities .
“ Trump Anxiety Disorder ” has continued to feature in mass media stories to this day , right up until shortly before the election .
The narrative has been that Trump is so horrible that he is somehow causing liberals to have psychological breakdowns with his awfulness .
What gets overlooked in these analyses , as is so often the case with human perception @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which people are taking in the information that is making them so anxious–in this case the news media .
It is not Trump himself who ’ s been making people feel terrified of a tyrannical Russian agent ending democracy in America and ruling with an iron fist , it is years of shrieking , hysterical coverage about Trump from the mass media .
Without all the deranged and persistent fearmongering , driven by a disdain for Trump ’ s unrefined narrative management style and an insatiable hunger for ratings and clicks , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they should be more terrified of this president than of any other shitty Reaganite Republican .
The Russian collusion narrative which dominated most of Trump ’ s presidency turned out to be essentially nothing .
The concentration camps , millions of deportations and armed militias driving non-whites out of the country that we were promised never came ; he never even came anywhere close to Obama ’ s deportation numbers and his support from minorities actually went up .
He hasn ’ t been any more warlike than his predecessors overall , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Most Americans actually reported that their lives had improved over Trump ’ s term before the pandemic hit .
Woke : A Field Guide Fo ... Johnstone , Caitlin Best Price : $ 20.37 Buy New $ 23.02 If people had just been given raw information about Trump ’ s presidency , they would have seen a lot of bad things , but things that are bad in the same way all the horrible aspects of the most destructive government on earth are bad .
They wouldn ’ t have known to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ irritable bowel syndrome .
They would have handled themselves in about the same way they always handled themselves during the administration of a president they didn ’ t like .
Instead , they were psychologically terrorized .
Made frightened , sick and traumatized by mass media pundits who only care about ratings and clicks , as was made clear when CBS chief Les Moonves famously said that Trump is bad for America but great for CBS .
Dragged through years of Russia hysteria and Trump hysteria with any excuse to spin Trump ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ norms , when in reality it was anything but .
It was a fairly conventional Republican presidency .
In reality , though most of them probably did not realize it , this is what Americans were actually voting against when they turned out in record numbers to cast their votes .
Not against Trump , but against this continued psychological abuse they ’ ve been suffering both directly and indirectly from the mass media .
Against being bashed in the face by shrieking , hysterical bullshit that hurts their bodies and makes them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of having to interact with stressed-out compatriots who haven ’ t been putting up well with the abuse .
It wasn ’ t a “ Get him out ” vote , it was a “ Make it stop ” vote .
Meanwhile , another pernicious effect of making Trump seem uniquely horrible has been retroactively making his predecessors seem nice by comparison , which is why George W Bush now enjoys majority support among Democrats after years of unpopularity .
Their depravity is hidden behind a media-generated wall labeled “ NOT TRUMP ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , his depravity will be hidden from view in the same way , neutering all mainstream opposition to his most deadly and dangerous actions .
Thanks for reading !
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack , which will get you an email notification for everything I publish .
My work is entirely reader-supported , so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around , liking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Twitter , throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal , purchasing some of my sweet merchandise , buying my new book Poems For Rebels or my old book Woke : A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers .
For more info on who I am , where I stand , and what I ’ m trying to do with this platform , click here .
Everyone , racist platforms excluded , has my permission to republish , use or translate any part of this work ( or anything else @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way they like free of charge .

The word “coup” is being thrown about in American liberal media today, not because US liberals suddenly became uncomfortable with the fact that their nation constantly stages coups and topples governments around the world as a matter of routine policy, but because they are all talking about (you guessed it) Donald Trump.
To be clear, none of the high-powered influencers who have been promoting the use of this word actually believe there is any possibility that Donald Trump will somehow remain in office after January of next year when he loses his legal appeals against the official results of the election, which would be the thing that a coup is. There is no means or institutional support through which the sitting president could accomplish such a thing. This is not a coup, it’s a glorified temper tantrum. Trump will leave office at the appointed time.
The establishment narrative managers are not terrifying their audiences with this word because they believe there is any danger of a coup actually happening. They are doing it because it’s their last chance to use Trump to psychologically abuse their audiences for clicks.
Warnings of a "coup" should at least come with a plausible mechanism by which a coup could be carried out. "The courts" Ok which court? Deciding which case about what state on which grounds? "The military" Which unit? Doing what? Under whose command? "Intelligence" Huh? https://t.co/0eDTAmxnkq — Alice's days are numbered ❌ (@AliceFromQueens) November 11, 2020
Last year the Pacific Standard published a report on “Trump Anxiety Disorder” or “Trump Hypersensitive Unexplained Disorder,” which it describes as follows: Poems For Rebels Foley, Timothy P Buy New $11.00 (as of 08:41 UTC - Details)
As the possibility of a Hillary Clinton victory began to slip away—and the possibility of a Donald Trump presidency became more and more certain—the contours of the new age of American anxiety began to take shape. In a 2017 column, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank described this phenomenon as “Trump Hypertensive Unexplained Disorder”: Overeating. Headaches. Fainting. Irregular heartbeat. Chronic neck pain. Depression. Irritable bowel syndrome. Tightness in the chest. Shortness of breath. Teeth grinding. Stomach ulcer. Indigestion. Shingles. Eye twitching. Nausea. Irritability. High blood sugar. Tinnitus. Reduced immunity. Racing pulse. Shaking limbs. Hair loss. Acid reflux. Deteriorating vision. Stroke. Heart attack. It was a veritable organ recital. Two years later, the physiological effects of the Trump administration aren’t going away. A growing body of research has tracked the detrimental impacts of Trump-related stress on broad segments of the American population, from young adults to women, to racial and LGBT communities. The results aren’t good.
“Trump Anxiety Disorder” has continued to feature in mass media stories to this day, right up until shortly before the election. The narrative has been that Trump is so horrible that he is somehow causing liberals to have psychological breakdowns with his awfulness.
What gets overlooked in these analyses, as is so often the case with human perception in general, is the means by which people are taking in the information that is making them so anxious–in this case the news media.
It is not Trump himself who’s been making people feel terrified of a tyrannical Russian agent ending democracy in America and ruling with an iron fist, it is years of shrieking, hysterical coverage about Trump from the mass media.
Without all the deranged and persistent fearmongering, driven by a disdain for Trump’s unrefined narrative management style and an insatiable hunger for ratings and clicks, it would never have occurred to Americans that they should be more terrified of this president than of any other shitty Reaganite Republican. The Russian collusion narrative which dominated most of Trump’s presidency turned out to be essentially nothing. The concentration camps, millions of deportations and armed militias driving non-whites out of the country that we were promised never came; he never even came anywhere close to Obama’s deportation numbers and his support from minorities actually went up. He hasn’t been any more warlike than his predecessors overall, and by some measures arguably less so. Most Americans actually reported that their lives had improved over Trump’s term before the pandemic hit. Woke: A Field Guide Fo... Johnstone, Caitlin Best Price: $20.37 Buy New $23.02 (as of 10:35 UTC - Details)
If people had just been given raw information about Trump’s presidency, they would have seen a lot of bad things, but things that are bad in the same way all the horrible aspects of the most destructive government on earth are bad. They wouldn’t have known to be horrified and anxious and have headaches and irritable bowel syndrome. They would have handled themselves in about the same way they always handled themselves during the administration of a president they didn’t like.
Instead, they were psychologically terrorized. Made frightened, sick and traumatized by mass media pundits who only care about ratings and clicks, as was made clear when CBS chief Les Moonves famously said that Trump is bad for America but great for CBS. Dragged through years of Russia hysteria and Trump hysteria with any excuse to spin Trump’s presidency as a remarkable departure from norms, when in reality it was anything but. It was a fairly conventional Republican presidency.
The MSM is brutalizing the American psyche day in and day out with its relentless shrieking coverage of Trump, and it’s killing them. Republicans call it “Trump Derangement Syndrome”, Dems call it “Trump Anxiety Disorder”, but it’s not. It’s psychological abuse via mass media. https://t.co/2dpDTznBRT — Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ (@caitoz) January 15, 2019
In reality, though most of them probably did not realize it, this is what Americans were actually voting against when they turned out in record numbers to cast their votes. Not against Trump, but against this continued psychological abuse they’ve been suffering both directly and indirectly from the mass media. Against being bashed in the face by shrieking, hysterical bullshit that hurts their bodies and makes them feel crazy, and against the unpleasantness of having to interact with stressed-out compatriots who haven’t been putting up well with the abuse.
It wasn’t a “Get him out” vote, it was a “Make it stop” vote.
Meanwhile, another pernicious effect of making Trump seem uniquely horrible has been retroactively making his predecessors seem nice by comparison, which is why George W Bush now enjoys majority support among Democrats after years of unpopularity. Their depravity is hidden behind a media-generated wall labeled “NOT TRUMP”. And when Biden steps into office, his depravity will be hidden from view in the same way, neutering all mainstream opposition to his most deadly and dangerous actions.
__________________
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my sweet merchandise, buying my new book Poems For Rebels or my old book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2


lewrockwell--2020-11-12--How Covid-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System

According to a study that examined how informed consent is given to COVID-19 vaccine trial participants , disclosure forms fail to inform volunteers that the vaccine might make them susceptible to more severe disease if they ’ re exposed to the virus .
The study,1 “ Informed Consent Disclosure to Vaccine Trial Subjects of Risk of COVID-19 Vaccine Worsening Clinical Disease , ” published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice , October 28 , 2020 , points out that “ COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ... Sompayrac , Lauren M. Best Price : $ 38.31 Buy New $ 32.28 As noted by the authors of that International Journal of Clinical Practice paper , previous coronavirus vaccine efforts — for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus ( SARS-CoV ) , Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus ( MERS-CoV ) and respiratory syncytial virus ( RSV ) — have revealed a serious concern : The vaccines have a tendency to trigger antibody-dependent enhancement .
What exactly does that mean ?
In a nutshell , it means that rather than enhance your immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enhances the virus ’ ability to enter and infect your cells , resulting in more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated.2 This is the exact opposite of what a vaccine is supposed to do , and a significant problem that has been pointed out from the very beginning of this push for a COVID-19 vaccine .
The 2003 review paper “ Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Virus Infection and Disease ” explains it this way:3 In my May 2020 interview above with Robert Kennedy Jr. , he summarized the history of coronavirus vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ following three consecutive SARS outbreaks .
By 2012 , Chinese , American and European scientists were working on SARS vaccine development , and had about 30 promising candidates .
Of those , the four best vaccine candidates were then given to ferrets , which are the closest analogue to human lung infections .
In the video below , which is a select outtake from my full interview , Kennedy explains what happened next .
While the ferrets displayed robust antibody response , which is the metric used for vaccine licensing , once they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they all became severely ill and died .
The same thing happened when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine in the 1960s .
RSV is an upper respiratory illness that is very similar to that caused by coronaviruses .
At that time , they had decided to skip animal trials and go directly to human trials .
Coronaviruses produce not just one but two different types of antibodies : • Neutralizing antibodies , also referred to as immoglobulin G ( IgG ) antibodies , that fight the infection • Binding antibodies ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can not prevent viral infection Instead of preventing viral infection , binding antibodies trigger an abnormal immune response known as “ paradoxical immune enhancement.
” Another way to look at this is your immune system is actually backfiring and not functioning to protect you but actually making you worse .
Many of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the running are using mRNA to instruct your cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein ( S protein ) .
The spike protein , which is what attaches to the ACE2 receptor of the cell , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process viruses use to gain entry into cells .
The idea is that by creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein , your immune system will commence production of antibodies , without making you sick in the process .
The key question is , which of the two types of antibodies are being produced through this process ?
In an April 2020 Twitter thread,6 The Immunologist noted : “ While developing vaccines … and considering immunity passports , we must first understand the complex role of antibodies in SARS , MERS and COVID-19.
” He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studies that have raised concerns about ADE .
The first is a 2017 study7 in PLOS Pathogens , ” Enhanced Inflammation in New Zealand White Rabbits When MERS-CoV Reinfection Occurs in the Absence of Neutralizing Antibody , ” which investigated whether getting infected with MERS would protect the subject against reinfection , as is typically the case with many viral illnesses .
( Meaning , once you recover from a viral infection , say measles , you ’ re immune and won ’ t contract the illness again . )
To determine how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers infected white rabbits with the virus .
The rabbits got sick and developed antibodies , but those antibodies were not the neutralizing kind , meaning the kind of antibodies that block infection .
As a result , they were not protected from reinfection , and when exposed to MERS for a second time , they became ill again , and more severely so .
“ In fact , reinfection resulted in enhanced pulmonary inflammation , without an associated increase in viral RNA titers , ” the authors noted .
Interestingly , neutralizing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , preventing the animals from being infected a third time .
According to the authors : In other words , if the vaccine does not result in a robust response in neutralizing antibodies , you might be at risk for more severe lung disease if you ’ re infected with the virus .
And here ’ s an important point : COVID-19 vaccines are NOT designed to prevent infection .
As detailed in “ How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged , ” a “ successful ” vaccine merely needs to reduce the severity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not even looking at reducing infection , hospitalization or death rates .
The Dengue virus is also known to cause ADE .
As explained in a Swiss Medical Weekly paper published in April 2020:8 The paper goes on to detail results from follow-up investigations into the Dengue vaccine , which revealed the hospitalization rate for Dengue among vaccinated children under the age of 9 was greater than the rate among controls .
The explanation for this appears to be that the vaccine mimicked a primary infection , and as that immunity waned , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they encountered the virus a second time .
The author explains : Doctoring Data : How to ... Dr Malcolm Kendrick Best Price : $ 17.00 Buy New $ 16.99 This could end up being important for the COVID-19 vaccine .
Hypothetically speaking , if SARS-CoV-2 works like Dengue , which is also caused by an RNA virus , then anyone who has not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 might actually be at increased risk for severe COVID-19 after vaccination , and only those who have already recovered from a bout of COVID-19 would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine .
To be clear , we do not know whether that is the case or not , but these are important areas of inquiry and the current vaccine trials will simply not be able to answer this important question .
The Swiss Medical Weekly paper9 also reviews the evidence of ADE in coronavirus infections , citing research showing inoculating cats against the feline infectious peritonitis virus ( FIPV ) — a feline coronavirus — increases the severity of the disease when challenged with the same FIPV serotype as that in the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Antibodies elicited by a SARS-CoV vaccine enhanced infection of B cell lines in spite of protective responses in the hamster model.
” Another paper,10 “ Antibody-Dependent SARS Coronavirus Infection Is Mediated by Antibodies Against Spike Proteins , ” published in 2014 , found that : A study11 that ties into this was published in the journal JCI Insight in 2019 .
Here , macaques vaccinated with a modified vaccinia Ankara ( MVA ) virus encoding full-length SARS-CoV spike protein ended up with more severe lung pathology when the animals were exposed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they transferred anti-spike IgG antibodies into unvaccinated macaques , they developed acute diffuse alveolar damage , likely by “ skewing the inflammation-resolving response.
” An interesting 2012 paper12 with the telling title , “ Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus , ” demonstrates what many researchers now fear , namely that COVID-19 vaccines may end up making people more prone to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection .
The paper reviews experiments showing immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines resulted in pulmonary immunophathology once challenged with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the authors:13 The Elderly Are Most Vulnerable to ADE On top of all of these concerns , there ’ s evidence showing the elderly — who are most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 — are also the most vulnerable to ADE .
Preliminary research findings14 posted on the preprint server medRxiv at the end of March 2020 reported that middle-aged and elderly COVID-19 patients have far higher levels of anti-spike antibodies — which , again , increase infectivity — than younger patients .
Another paper worth mentioning is the May 2020 mini review15 “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hyperimmune Globulin Therapy and Vaccine Development.
” As in many other papers , the authors point out that:16 Do a Risk-Benefit Analysis Before Making Up Your Mind In all likelihood , regardless of how effective ( or ineffective ) the COVID-19 vaccines end up being , they ’ ll be released to the public in relatively short order .
Most predict one or more vaccines will be ready sometime in 2021 .
Ironically , the data17,18,19 we now have no longer support a mass vaccination mandate , considering the lethality of COVID-19 is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the age of 60.20 If you ’ re under the age of 40 , your risk of dying from COVID-19 is just 0.01 % , meaning you have a 99.99 % chance of surviving the infection .
And you could improve that to 99.999 % if you ’ re metabolically flexible and vitamin D replete .
So , really , what are we protecting against with a COVID-19 vaccine ?
As mentioned , the vaccines aren ’ t even designed to prevent infection , only reduce the severity of symptoms .
Meanwhile , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ’ re exposed to the virus .
That seems like a lot of risk for a truly questionable benefit .
To circle back to where we started , participants in current COVID-19 vaccine trials are not being told of this risk — that by getting the vaccine they may end up with more severe COVID-19 once they ’ re infected with the virus .
In closing , consider what this PNAS news feature states about the risk of vaccine-induced immune enhancement and dysfunction , particularly for the elderly , the very people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ might offer the most:21 The Best of Joseph Mercola

According to a study that examined how informed consent is given to COVID-19 vaccine trial participants, disclosure forms fail to inform volunteers that the vaccine might make them susceptible to more severe disease if they’re exposed to the virus.
The study,1 “Informed Consent Disclosure to Vaccine Trial Subjects of Risk of COVID-19 Vaccine Worsening Clinical Disease,” published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice, October 28, 2020, points out that “COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.”
“Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralizing antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE),” the paper states.
“This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”
What Is Antibody-Dependent Enhancement?
How the Immune System ... Sompayrac, Lauren M. Best Price: $38.31 Buy New $32.28 (as of 08:42 UTC - Details) As noted by the authors of that International Journal of Clinical Practice paper, previous coronavirus vaccine efforts — for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) — have revealed a serious concern: The vaccines have a tendency to trigger antibody-dependent enhancement.
What exactly does that mean? In a nutshell, it means that rather than enhance your immunity against the infection, the vaccine actually enhances the virus’ ability to enter and infect your cells, resulting in more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated.2
This is the exact opposite of what a vaccine is supposed to do, and a significant problem that has been pointed out from the very beginning of this push for a COVID-19 vaccine. The 2003 review paper “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Virus Infection and Disease” explains it this way:3
“In general, virus-specific antibodies are considered antiviral and play an important role in the control of virus infections in a number of ways. However, in some instances, the presence of specific antibodies can be beneficial to the virus. This activity is known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of virus infection.
The ADE of virus infection is a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies enhance the entry of virus, and in some cases the replication of virus, into monocytes/macrophages and granulocytic cells through interaction with Fc and/or complement receptors.
This phenomenon has been reported in vitro and in vivo for viruses representing numerous families and genera of public health and veterinary importance. These viruses share some common features such as preferential replication in macrophages, ability to establish persistence, and antigenic diversity. For some viruses, ADE of infection has become a great concern to disease control by vaccination.”
Previous Coronavirus Vaccine Efforts Have All Failed
In my May 2020 interview above with Robert Kennedy Jr., he summarized the history of coronavirus vaccine development, which began in 2002, following three consecutive SARS outbreaks. By 2012, Chinese, American and European scientists were working on SARS vaccine development, and had about 30 promising candidates.
Of those, the four best vaccine candidates were then given to ferrets, which are the closest analogue to human lung infections. In the video below, which is a select outtake from my full interview, Kennedy explains what happened next. While the ferrets displayed robust antibody response, which is the metric used for vaccine licensing, once they were challenged with the wild virus, they all became severely ill and died.
The same thing happened when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine in the 1960s. RSV is an upper respiratory illness that is very similar to that caused by coronaviruses. At that time, they had decided to skip animal trials and go directly to human trials.
“They tested it on I think about 35 children, and the same thing happened,” Kennedy said. “The children developed a champion antibody response — robust, durable. It looked perfect [but when] the children were exposed to the wild virus, they all became sick. Two of them died. They abandoned the vaccine. It was a big embarrassment to FDA and NIH.”

Neutralizing Versus Binding Antibodies
Coronaviruses produce not just one but two different types of antibodies:
Neutralizing antibodies, 4 also referred to as immoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, that fight the infection
also referred to as immoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, that fight the infection Binding antibodies 5 (also known as nonneutralizing antibodies) that cannot prevent viral infection
Instead of preventing viral infection, binding antibodies trigger an abnormal immune response known as “paradoxical immune enhancement.” Another way to look at this is your immune system is actually backfiring and not functioning to protect you but actually making you worse.
Many of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the running are using mRNA to instruct your cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S protein). The spike protein, which is what attaches to the ACE2 receptor of the cell, is the first stage of the two-stage process viruses use to gain entry into cells.
The idea is that by creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, your immune system will commence production of antibodies, without making you sick in the process. The key question is, which of the two types of antibodies are being produced through this process?
Without Neutralizing Antibodies, Expect More Severe Illness
In an April 2020 Twitter thread,6 The Immunologist noted: “While developing vaccines … and considering immunity passports, we must first understand the complex role of antibodies in SARS, MERS and COVID-19.” He goes on to list several coronavirus vaccine studies that have raised concerns about ADE.
The first is a 2017 study7 in PLOS Pathogens, ”Enhanced Inflammation in New Zealand White Rabbits When MERS-CoV Reinfection Occurs in the Absence of Neutralizing Antibody,” which investigated whether getting infected with MERS would protect the subject against reinfection, as is typically the case with many viral illnesses. (Meaning, once you recover from a viral infection, say measles, you’re immune and won’t contract the illness again.)
To determine how MERS affects the immune system, the researchers infected white rabbits with the virus. The rabbits got sick and developed antibodies, but those antibodies were not the neutralizing kind, meaning the kind of antibodies that block infection. As a result, they were not protected from reinfection, and when exposed to MERS for a second time, they became ill again, and more severely so.
“In fact, reinfection resulted in enhanced pulmonary inflammation, without an associated increase in viral RNA titers,” the authors noted. Interestingly, neutralizing antibodies were elicited during this second infection, preventing the animals from being infected a third time. According to the authors:
“Our data from the rabbit model suggests that people exposed to MERS-CoV who fail to develop a neutralizing antibody response, or persons whose neutralizing antibody titers have waned, may be at risk for severe lung disease on re-exposure to MERS-CoV.”
In other words, if the vaccine does not result in a robust response in neutralizing antibodies, you might be at risk for more severe lung disease if you’re infected with the virus.
And here’s an important point: COVID-19 vaccines are NOT designed to prevent infection. As detailed in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged,” a “successful” vaccine merely needs to reduce the severity of the symptoms. They’re not even looking at reducing infection, hospitalization or death rates.
ADE in Dengue Infections
The Dengue virus is also known to cause ADE. As explained in a Swiss Medical Weekly paper published in April 2020:8
“The pathogenesis of COVID-19 is currently believed to proceed via both directly cytotoxic and immune-mediated mechanisms. An additional mechanism facilitating viral cell entry and subsequent damage may involve the so-called antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
ADE is a very well-known cascade of events whereby viruses may infect susceptible cells via interaction between virions complexed with antibodies or complement components and, respectively, Fc or complement receptors, leading to the amplification of their replication.
This phenomenon is of enormous relevance not only for the understanding of viral pathogenesis, but also for developing antiviral strategies, notably vaccines …
There are four serotypes of Dengue virus, all eliciting protective immunity. However, although homotypic protection is long-lasting, cross-neutralizing antibodies against different serotypes are short-lived and may last only up to 2 years.
In Dengue fever, reinfection with a different serotype runs a more severe course when the protective antibody titer wanes. Here, non-neutralizing antibodies take over neutralizing ones, bind to Dengue virions, and these complexes mediate the infection of phagocytic cells via interaction with the Fc receptor, in a typical ADE.
In other words, heterotypic antibodies at subneutralizing titres account for ADE in persons infected with a serotype of Dengue virus that is different from the first infection.
Cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies are associated with decreased odds of symptomatic secondary infection, and the higher the titer of such antibodies following the primary infection, the longer the delay to symptomatic secondary infection …”
The paper goes on to detail results from follow-up investigations into the Dengue vaccine, which revealed the hospitalization rate for Dengue among vaccinated children under the age of 9 was greater than the rate among controls. The explanation for this appears to be that the vaccine mimicked a primary infection, and as that immunity waned, the children became susceptible to ADE when they encountered the virus a second time. The author explains: Doctoring Data: How to... Dr Malcolm Kendrick Best Price: $17.00 Buy New $16.99 (as of 07:45 UTC - Details)
“A post hoc analysis of efficacy trials, using an anti-nonstructural protein 1 immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to distinguish antibodies elicited by wild-type infection from those following vaccination, showed that the vaccine was able to protect against severe Dengue [in] those who had been exposed to the natural infection before vaccination, and that the risk of severe clinical outcome was increased among seronegative persons.
Based on this, a Strategic Advisor Group of Experts convened by World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that only Dengue seropositive persons should be vaccinated whenever Dengue control programs are planned that include vaccination.”
ADE in Coronavirus Infections
This could end up being important for the COVID-19 vaccine. Hypothetically speaking, if SARS-CoV-2 works like Dengue, which is also caused by an RNA virus, then anyone who has not tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 might actually be at increased risk for severe COVID-19 after vaccination, and only those who have already recovered from a bout of COVID-19 would be protected against severe illness by the vaccine.
To be clear, we do not know whether that is the case or not, but these are important areas of inquiry and the current vaccine trials will simply not be able to answer this important question.
The Swiss Medical Weekly paper9 also reviews the evidence of ADE in coronavirus infections, citing research showing inoculating cats against the feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) — a feline coronavirus — increases the severity of the disease when challenged with the same FIPV serotype as that in the vaccine.
Experiments have shown immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines resulted in pulmonary immunophathology once challenged with the SARS virus.
The paper also cites research showing “Antibodies elicited by a SARS-CoV vaccine enhanced infection of B cell lines in spite of protective responses in the hamster model.” Another paper,10 “Antibody-Dependent SARS Coronavirus Infection Is Mediated by Antibodies Against Spike Proteins,” published in 2014, found that:
“… higher concentrations of anti-sera against SARS-CoV neutralized SARS-CoV infection, while highly diluted anti-sera significantly increased SARS-CoV infection and induced higher levels of apoptosis.
Results from infectivity assays indicate that SARS-CoV ADE is primarily mediated by diluted antibodies against envelope spike proteins rather than nucleocapsid proteins. We also generated monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV spike proteins and observed that most of them promoted SARS-CoV infection.
Combined, our results suggest that antibodies against SARS-CoV spike proteins may trigger ADE effects. The data raise new questions regarding a potential SARS-CoV vaccine …”
A study11 that ties into this was published in the journal JCI Insight in 2019. Here, macaques vaccinated with a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus encoding full-length SARS-CoV spike protein ended up with more severe lung pathology when the animals were exposed to the SARS virus. And, when they transferred anti-spike IgG antibodies into unvaccinated macaques, they developed acute diffuse alveolar damage, likely by “skewing the inflammation-resolving response.”
SARS Vaccine Worsens Infection After Challenge With SARS-CoV
An interesting 2012 paper12 with the telling title, “Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus,” demonstrates what many researchers now fear, namely that COVID-19 vaccines may end up making people more prone to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The paper reviews experiments showing immunization with a variety of SARS vaccines resulted in pulmonary immunophathology once challenged with the SARS virus. As noted by the authors:13
“Inactivated whole virus vaccines whether inactivated with formalin or beta propiolactone and whether given with our without alum adjuvant exhibited a Th2-type immunopathologic in lungs after challenge.
As indicated, two reports attributed the immunopathology to presence of the N protein in the vaccine; however, we found the same immunopathologic reaction in animals given S protein vaccine only, although it appeared to be of lesser intensity.
Thus, a Th2-type immunopathologic reaction on challenge of vaccinated animals has occurred in three of four animal models (not in hamsters) including two different inbred mouse strains with four different types of SARS-CoV vaccines with and without alum adjuvant. An inactivated vaccine preparation that does not induce this result in mice, ferrets and nonhuman primates has not been reported.
This combined experience provides concern for trials with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans. Clinical trials with SARS coronavirus vaccines have been conducted and reported to induce antibody responses and to be ‘safe.’ However, the evidence for safety is for a short period of observation.
The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on exposure to infectious SARS-CoV, the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS. Additional safety concerns relate to effectiveness and safety against antigenic variants of SARS-CoV and for safety of vaccinated persons exposed to other coronaviruses, particularly those of the type 2 group.”
The Elderly Are Most Vulnerable to ADE
On top of all of these concerns, there’s evidence showing the elderly — who are most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 — are also the most vulnerable to ADE. Preliminary research findings14 posted on the preprint server medRxiv at the end of March 2020 reported that middle-aged and elderly COVID-19 patients have far higher levels of anti-spike antibodies — which, again, increase infectivity — than younger patients.
Immune Enhancement Is a Serious Concern
Another paper worth mentioning is the May 2020 mini review15 “Impact of Immune Enhancement on COVID-19 Polyclonal Hyperimmune Globulin Therapy and Vaccine Development.” As in many other papers, the authors point out that:16
“While development of both hyperimmune globulin therapy and vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 are promising, they both pose a common theoretical safety concern. Experimental studies have suggested the possibility of immune-enhanced disease of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infections, which may thus similarly occur with SARS-CoV-2 infection …
Immune enhancement of disease can theoretically occur in two ways. Firstly, non-neutralizing or sub-neutralizing levels of antibodies can enhance SARS-CoV-2 infection into target cells.
Secondly, antibodies could enhance inflammation and hence severity of pulmonary disease. An overview of these antibody dependent infection and immunopathology enhancement effects are summarized in Fig. 1 …
Currently, there are multiple SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccine candidates in pre-clinical or early phase clinical trials. Animal studies on these CoVs have shown that the spike (S) protein-based vaccines (specifically the receptor binding domain, RBD) are highly immunogenic and protective against wild-type CoV challenge.
Vaccines that target other parts of the virus, such as the nucleocapsid, without the S protein, have shown no protection against CoV infection and increased lung pathology. However, immunization with some S protein based CoV vaccines have also displayed signs of enhanced lung pathology following challenge.
Hence, besides the choice of antigen target, vaccine efficacy and risk of immunopathology may be dependent on other ancillary factors, including adjuvant formulation, age at vaccination … and route of immunization.”
Figure 1: Mechanism of ADE and antibody mediated immunopathology. Left panel: For ADE, immune complex internalization is mediated by the engagement of activating Fc receptors on the cell surface. Co-ligation of inhibitory receptors then results in the inhibition of antiviral responses which leads to increased viral replication. Right panel: Antibodies can cause immunopathology by activating the complement pathway or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). For both pathways, excessive immune activation results in the release of cytokines and chemokines, leading to enhanced disease pathology.
Do a Risk-Benefit Analysis Before Making Up Your Mind
In all likelihood, regardless of how effective (or ineffective) the COVID-19 vaccines end up being, they’ll be released to the public in relatively short order. Most predict one or more vaccines will be ready sometime in 2021.
Ironically, the data17,18,19 we now have no longer support a mass vaccination mandate, considering the lethality of COVID-19 is lower than the flu for those under the age of 60.20 If you’re under the age of 40, your risk of dying from COVID-19 is just 0.01%, meaning you have a 99.99% chance of surviving the infection. And you could improve that to 99.999% if you’re metabolically flexible and vitamin D replete.
So, really, what are we protecting against with a COVID-19 vaccine? As mentioned, the vaccines aren’t even designed to prevent infection, only reduce the severity of symptoms. Meanwhile, they could potentially make you sicker once you’re exposed to the virus. That seems like a lot of risk for a truly questionable benefit.
To circle back to where we started, participants in current COVID-19 vaccine trials are not being told of this risk — that by getting the vaccine they may end up with more severe COVID-19 once they’re infected with the virus.
Lethal Th2 Immunopathology Is Another Potential Risk
In closing, consider what this PNAS news feature states about the risk of vaccine-induced immune enhancement and dysfunction, particularly for the elderly, the very people who would need the protection a vaccine might offer the most:21
“Since the 1960s, tests of vaccine candidates for diseases such as dengue, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have shown a paradoxical phenomenon:
Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated. The vaccine-primed immune system, in certain cases, seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection …
This immune backfiring, or so-called immune enhancement, may manifest in different ways such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a process in which a virus leverages antibodies to aid infection; or cell-based enhancement, a category that includes allergic inflammation caused by Th2 immunopathology. In some cases, the enhancement processes might overlap …
Some researchers argue that although ADE has received the most attention to date, it is less likely than the other immune enhancement pathways to cause a dysregulated response to COVID-19, given what is known about the epidemiology of the virus and its behavior in the human body.
‘There is the potential for ADE, but the bigger problem is probably Th2 immunopathology,’ says Ralph Baric, an epidemiologist and expert in coronaviruses … at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
In previous studies of SARS, aged mice were found to have particularly high risks of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology … in which a faulty T cell response triggers allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes, activating the complement system and potentially damaging the airways.”
Sources and References
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola


lewrockwell--2020-11-12--The Media Know There Was Vote Fraud, So Why Do They Deny the Obvious?

The Presstitutes Speak With One Voice .
They are unanimous that there was no vote fraud committed by Democrats and that a record number of Americans voted for a president suffering from mental confusion whose campaign rallies went unattended .
If the presstitutes are so confident that there is no evidence to back the legal challenges , why are the prostitutes working overtime to discredit the challenges in advance ?
All presstitutes are in denial that there is any evidence of fraud .
Why not just wait for the challenges to fail ?
Why all the whistling in the dark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , claims that no election officials doubt the validity of the vote and that Trump “ has launched a series of long-shot legal challenges in several state aimed at casting doubt on election results , despite no evidence of voter fraud.
” The Tyranny of Good In ... Paul Craig Roberts , La ... Best Price : $ 6.96 Buy New $ 8.95 Even the financial news site , Bloomberg , has falsely declared that there is “ no evidence of wrongdoing.
” How can the media know until the charges are investigated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , why has the Georgia Secretary of State ordered a hand recount of the presidential race ?
Why did Supreme Court Justice Alito order Pennsylvania election officials to segregate and separately count ballots that arrived after election day ?
Alito ordered the late ballots be kept “ in a secure , safe and sealed container separate from other voted ballots.
” See also this .
Licensed to Lie Powell , Sidney Best Price : $ 17.87 Buy New $ 23.93 If there is no evidence of fraud , what is the point of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no fraud , what is the basis of the legal challenges being filed by White House Counsel Giuliani ?
A former US Attorney who presided over high profile cases is not going to squander his reputation by filing legal challenges with no evidence .
There is plenty of evidence .
The only question is whether the Republican Party and the courts have the stomach for the devastating blow to America ’ s reputation of proving that the Democrats with the complicity of the media stole a presidential election .
The Republicans might be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reputation than Trump ’ s presidency , and the courts could worry that establishing election theft would undermine Americans ’ confidence in their system and lead to political instability .
Above the Law : The Ins ... Whitaker , Matthew Buy New $ 26.09 Leaders have had to deal with these kinds of concerns before .
Everyone on the Warren Commission knew that Oswald was not the assassin of President Kennedy , and the 9/11 Commission knew that the official story was false .
The 9/11 commission chairman , co-chairman , and legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said that information was withheld from them and that the committee was set up to fail .
It was impossible to tell the public in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis with the Soviet Union that their president had been assassinated by the US Joint Chiefs and CIA with the complicity of the Secret Service .
The Warren Commission understood completely that destroying the public ’ s confidence in military and security leaders at a time of such tension with the Soviet Union would have been disastrous .
The same for 9/11 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circumstances going to tell the public that it was a false flag attack necessary to launch two decades of war in the Middle East .
It is certainly the case that red state America knows the election was stolen , so withholding known information is not going to prevent a split in the country .
It will simply make it worse by giving red state America proof that the system is broken and can not be fixed .
Nevertheless , Republicans and courts might not realize this , and even if they do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ones who pull the trigger .
Karl Marx said that audacity , if audacious enough , works , and Lenin proved it .
This , I believe , is what the Democrats and presstitutes are relying on .
The Best of Paul Craig Roberts

The Presstitutes Speak With One Voice. They are unanimous that there was no vote fraud committed by Democrats and that a record number of Americans voted for a president suffering from mental confusion whose campaign rallies went unattended.
If the presstitutes are so confident that there is no evidence to back the legal challenges, why are the prostitutes working overtime to discredit the challenges in advance? All presstitutes are in denial that there is any evidence of fraud. Why not just wait for the challenges to fail? Why all the whistling in the dark?
The Boston Globe, for example, claims that no election officials doubt the validity of the vote and that Trump “has launched a series of long-shot legal challenges in several state aimed at casting doubt on election results, despite no evidence of voter fraud.” The Tyranny of Good In... Paul Craig Roberts, La... Best Price: $6.96 Buy New $8.95 (as of 07:10 UTC - Details)
Even the financial news site, Bloomberg, has falsely declared that there is “no evidence of wrongdoing.” How can the media know until the charges are investigated?
If fraud is not a possibility, why has the Georgia Secretary of State ordered a hand recount of the presidential race?
Why did Supreme Court Justice Alito order Pennsylvania election officials to segregate and separately count ballots that arrived after election day? Alito ordered the late ballots be kept “in a secure, safe and sealed container separate from other voted ballots.” See also this.
Licensed to Lie Powell, Sidney Best Price: $17.87 Buy New $23.93 (as of 05:55 UTC - Details) If there is no evidence of fraud, what is the point of such an order?
If there is no fraud, what is the basis of the legal challenges being filed by White House Counsel Giuliani? A former US Attorney who presided over high profile cases is not going to squander his reputation by filing legal challenges with no evidence.
There is plenty of evidence. The only question is whether the Republican Party and the courts have the stomach for the devastating blow to America’s reputation of proving that the Democrats with the complicity of the media stole a presidential election. The Republicans might be more inclined to protect America’s reputation than Trump’s presidency, and the courts could worry that establishing election theft would undermine Americans’ confidence in their system and lead to political instability.
Above the Law: The Ins... Whitaker, Matthew Buy New $26.09 (as of 05:57 UTC - Details) Leaders have had to deal with these kinds of concerns before. Everyone on the Warren Commission knew that Oswald was not the assassin of President Kennedy, and the 9/11 Commission knew that the official story was false. The 9/11 commission chairman, co-chairman, and legal counsel later wrote books in which they said that information was withheld from them and that the committee was set up to fail.
It was impossible to tell the public in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis with the Soviet Union that their president had been assassinated by the US Joint Chiefs and CIA with the complicity of the Secret Service. The Warren Commission understood completely that destroying the public’s confidence in military and security leaders at a time of such tension with the Soviet Union would have been disastrous. The same for 9/11. The commission was not under any circumstances going to tell the public that it was a false flag attack necessary to launch two decades of war in the Middle East.
It is certainly the case that red state America knows the election was stolen, so withholding known information is not going to prevent a split in the country. It will simply make it worse by giving red state America proof that the system is broken and cannot be fixed.
Nevertheless, Republicans and courts might not realize this, and even if they do they might not want to be the ones who pull the trigger.
Karl Marx said that audacity, if audacious enough, works, and Lenin proved it. This, I believe, is what the Democrats and presstitutes are relying on.
The Best of Paul Craig Roberts