vox--2020-12-14--The sexual harassment allegation against Gov. Andrew Cuomo, explained

“ Yes , @ NYGovCuomo sexually harassed me for years .
Many saw it , and watched.
” So said Lindsey Boylan , a candidate for Manhattan borough president and former adviser to New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo , in a tweet thread Sunday morning .
Boylan , who appears to have worked for the governor ’ s office from 2015 to 2018 , provided few specifics in the thread and stated that she has “ no interest in talking to journalists ” ( Boylan also has not responded to Vox ’ s request for comment ) .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never anticipate what to expect : would I be grilled on my work ( which was very good ) or harassed about my looks .
Or would it be both in the same conversation ?
” The governor ’ s office has denied the allegation .
“ There is simply no truth to these claims , ” Caitlin Girouard , the governor ’ s press secretary , said in an email to Vox on Monday .
The report comes at a time of intense scrutiny for Cuomo , as he manages rising coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state .
The governor has been among the most visible figures in the pandemic , gaining a devoted following for his straight-talking news conferences at a time when the president was denying reality , and even writing a book about it called American Crisis .
He ’ s also reportedly been discussed as a possible attorney general in the administration of President-elect Joe Biden .
But Boylan says that would be a mistake , tweeting , “ There are fewer things more scary than giving this man , who exists without ethics , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complicate his political future .
It also raises new questions about the working environment within New York state government , which has seen several officials accused of harassment or other misconduct in recent years .
Cuomo isn ’ t the only New York official to be the subject of recent harassment allegations Boylan , 36 , worked for the governor ’ s office as a deputy secretary of economic development and a special adviser to the governor , according to LinkedIn .
Since her departure , she has been a public critic of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the New York Times .
In 2019 , for example , she called into question the office ’ s support for working parents .
She also described her experience working there as “ beyond toxic ” and “ endlessly dispiriting.
” And now Boylan has gone public with a more specific report : that Cuomo sexually harassed her over a period of years .
Though she provided few details , she did describe her frustration with the experience and others ’ inaction .
“ Not knowing what to expect ” was “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that no one would do a damn thing even when they saw it , ” Boylan tweeted .
“ And I *know* I am not the only woman , ” she added .
No other women appear to have yet come forward with public allegations of harassment by Cuomo .
But other New York State officials and employees have been the subject of such reports in recent years .
In 2017 , for example , a former state employee reported that Sam Hoyt , who had recently resigned from his job as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and assaulted her ( Hoyt denied the allegations but said the two had a consensual relationship ) .
And in 2018 , New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman resigned after the New Yorker reported that four women had accused him of physical abuse .
Cuomo has bristled in the past when asked if the New York state government has a problem with harassment , as Dana Rubinstein and Jesse McKinley note at the Times .
When asked by reporter Karen DeWitt about harassment in state government in the wake of the Hoyt allegations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you say it ’ s ‘ state government , ’ you do a disservice to women , with all due respect , even though you ’ re a woman.
” “ It ’ s not government , it ’ s society , ” he added .
“ It ’ s not just one person in one area.
” Now the allegations about New York government go right to the top .
And it ’ s coming at a time when Cuomo ’ s political career is at a crossroads .
New York state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Cuomo has said he will seek reelection in 2022 .
But he ’ s also been discussed as a candidate for higher office ( even though he ended up nixing a run for president in 2020 ) .
That ’ s especially true since his handling of the pandemic earned him points with New Yorkers and Americans nationwide .
Cuomo has gained fame for his gruff news conferences announcing Covid-19 rates and restrictions , his dad jokes about not being “ a turkey ” by flouting pandemic rules on Thanksgiving , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book about handling Covid-19 in New York was criticized by some who questioned his decision to release it in October with the pandemic very much ongoing , but was also a New York Times bestseller .
He ’ s also gained the affection of some liberals by sparring with President Trump .
Given all this , it ’ s not surprising that he ’ s reportedly being considered for a role in the Biden administration .
But Cuomo is also facing a wintertime coronavirus surge in New York , which could force a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ matter of weeks — and , potentially , call his pandemic success into doubt .
And now , the governor who signed high-profile anti-harassment legislation in 2018 is facing a harassment allegation himself .
Even though Cuomo denies the allegation , it is sure to force , if nothing else , added scrutiny into his past and the culture of the government he runs .
“ I ’ m angry to be put in this situation at all .
That because I am a woman , I can work hard my whole life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet still fall victim as countless women over generations have , ” Boylan tweeted .
“ I hate that some men , like @ NYGovCuomo abuse their power .
”

“Yes, @NYGovCuomo sexually harassed me for years. Many saw it, and watched.”
So said Lindsey Boylan, a candidate for Manhattan borough president and former adviser to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in a tweet thread Sunday morning.
Boylan, who appears to have worked for the governor’s office from 2015 to 2018, provided few specifics in the thread and stated that she has “no interest in talking to journalists” (Boylan also has not responded to Vox’s request for comment). But she did say, “I could never anticipate what to expect: would I be grilled on my work (which was very good) or harassed about my looks. Or would it be both in the same conversation?”
The governor’s office has denied the allegation. “There is simply no truth to these claims,” Caitlin Girouard, the governor’s press secretary, said in an email to Vox on Monday.
The report comes at a time of intense scrutiny for Cuomo, as he manages rising coronavirus infections and the vaccine rollout in his state. The governor has been among the most visible figures in the pandemic, gaining a devoted following for his straight-talking news conferences at a time when the president was denying reality, and even writing a book about it called American Crisis. He’s also reportedly been discussed as a possible attorney general in the administration of President-elect Joe Biden.
But Boylan says that would be a mistake, tweeting, “There are fewer things more scary than giving this man, who exists without ethics, even more control.”
Her allegation could complicate his political future. It also raises new questions about the working environment within New York state government, which has seen several officials accused of harassment or other misconduct in recent years.
Cuomo isn’t the only New York official to be the subject of recent harassment allegations
Boylan, 36, worked for the governor’s office as a deputy secretary of economic development and a special adviser to the governor, according to LinkedIn. Since her departure, she has been a public critic of the governor and his office, according to the New York Times. In 2019, for example, she called into question the office’s support for working parents. She also described her experience working there as “beyond toxic” and “endlessly dispiriting.”
And now Boylan has gone public with a more specific report: that Cuomo sexually harassed her over a period of years. Though she provided few details, she did describe her frustration with the experience and others’ inaction. “Not knowing what to expect” was “the most upsetting part aside from knowing that no one would do a damn thing even when they saw it,” Boylan tweeted.
“And I *know* I am not the only woman,” she added.
No other women appear to have yet come forward with public allegations of harassment by Cuomo. But other New York State officials and employees have been the subject of such reports in recent years. In 2017, for example, a former state employee reported that Sam Hoyt, who had recently resigned from his job as a senior-level state official, had sexually harassed and assaulted her (Hoyt denied the allegations but said the two had a consensual relationship). And in 2018, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman resigned after the New Yorker reported that four women had accused him of physical abuse.
Cuomo has bristled in the past when asked if the New York state government has a problem with harassment, as Dana Rubinstein and Jesse McKinley note at the Times. When asked by reporter Karen DeWitt about harassment in state government in the wake of the Hoyt allegations, the governor responded, “When you say it’s ‘state government,’ you do a disservice to women, with all due respect, even though you’re a woman.”
“It’s not government, it’s society,” he added. “It’s not just one person in one area.”
The allegation could complicate Cuomo’s political future
Now the allegations about New York government go right to the top. And it’s coming at a time when Cuomo’s political career is at a crossroads.
New York state doesn’t have term limits, and Cuomo has said he will seek reelection in 2022. But he’s also been discussed as a candidate for higher office (even though he ended up nixing a run for president in 2020). That’s especially true since his handling of the pandemic earned him points with New Yorkers and Americans nationwide.
Cuomo has gained fame for his gruff news conferences announcing Covid-19 rates and restrictions, his dad jokes about not being “a turkey” by flouting pandemic rules on Thanksgiving, and his weird taste in posters. His book about handling Covid-19 in New York was criticized by some who questioned his decision to release it in October with the pandemic very much ongoing, but was also a New York Times bestseller. He’s also gained the affection of some liberals by sparring with President Trump.
Given all this, it’s not surprising that he’s reportedly being considered for a role in the Biden administration. But Cuomo is also facing a wintertime coronavirus surge in New York, which could force a shutdown in New York City in a matter of weeks — and, potentially, call his pandemic success into doubt. And now, the governor who signed high-profile anti-harassment legislation in 2018 is facing a harassment allegation himself.
Even though Cuomo denies the allegation, it is sure to force, if nothing else, added scrutiny into his past and the culture of the government he runs.
“I’m angry to be put in this situation at all. That because I am a woman, I can work hard my whole life to better myself and help others and yet still fall victim as countless women over generations have,” Boylan tweeted. “I hate that some men, like @NYGovCuomo abuse their power.”


vox--2020-12-14--RSVP now: Dr. Fauci joins Today, Explained for a live conversation

Worldwide , as of December 11 , 2020 , the coronavirus has taken nearly 1.6 million lives — and changed billions .
Join Dr. Anthony Fauci and Today , Explained host Sean Rameswaram on Tuesday , December 15 , at 12:30 pm ET for a live virtual discussion on how this year has changed all of us and how it has impacted Fauci personally and professionally .
Vox reporter Umair Irfan will also join to talk about what ’ s next for the coronavirus pandemic , including the latest Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine news , and answer some of your questions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US .
This event is free for everyone .
RSVP now to reserve your spot .
This live conversation will become part of the Today , Explained upcoming podcast series “ You , Me , and Covid-19 , ” looking back on how the coronavirus has fundamentally reshaped our world .
Through reporting , listener reflections , and interviews , the team will examine how Covid-19 changed our relationships with each other and the places we live , upended our livelihoods , and redefined what we thought of as “ normal.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Monday , December 21 , and continues through that week .
Subscribe to Today , Explained wherever you listen to podcasts — including Apple Podcasts , Google Podcasts , and Spotify — so you don ’ t miss an episode .

Worldwide, as of December 11, 2020, the coronavirus has taken nearly 1.6 million lives — and changed billions.
Join Dr. Anthony Fauci and Today, Explained host Sean Rameswaram on Tuesday, December 15, at 12:30 pm ET for a live virtual discussion on how this year has changed all of us and how it has impacted Fauci personally and professionally. Vox reporter Umair Irfan will also join to talk about what’s next for the coronavirus pandemic, including the latest Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine news, and answer some of your questions about the upcoming vaccine rollout in the US.
This event is free for everyone. RSVP now to reserve your spot.
This live conversation will become part of the Today, Explained upcoming podcast series “You, Me, and Covid-19,” looking back on how the coronavirus has fundamentally reshaped our world. Through reporting, listener reflections, and interviews, the team will examine how Covid-19 changed our relationships with each other and the places we live, upended our livelihoods, and redefined what we thought of as “normal.”
The first episode of the series drops on Monday, December 21, and continues through that week. Subscribe to Today, Explained wherever you listen to podcasts — including Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and Spotify — so you don’t miss an episode.


vox--2020-12-14--Trump keeps coming up with new reasons to veto Congress’s huge annual defense bill

First , President Donald Trump threatened to veto the annual defense bill because lawmakers wanted the names of Confederate generals removed from US Army bases .
Then , he said he ’ d torpedo the bipartisan legislation unless it repealed an internet free-speech law , allowing him to spew conspiracy theories on the internet unchallenged .
And on Sunday , he pledged to block the bill because it ’ s not tough enough on China , despite it having what one Democratic Congressional aide described to me as “ the strongest provisions ever to address the rising power.
” Despite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look unserious , what he ’ s promising to do has far-reaching consequences — potentially harming military members , their families , and Trump ’ s own reputation in the process .
Among many other things , the $ 741 billion National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) includes pay raises for US troops , billions for a counter-China fund , and military construction projects that pour money into local economies .
Those provisions are why the Republican-controlled Senate and Democrat-led House overwhelmingly passed the bill last week , continuing a decades-long streak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kill this version of the NDAA — a bold play , as both chambers okayed the law with veto-proof majorities last week .
They ’ ll be able to override a Trump veto if those margins hold , possibly dealing the president a stinging rebuke as his administration winds down .
It helps explain why Trump is lunging for something — anything — that would get lawmakers to meet his demand to kill the bill .
His messaging so far hasn ’ t gained any traction , perhaps because the main three points @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found a large audience in Congress .
“ I don ’ t think Donald Trump knows what he ’ s talking about , ” said Rep. Jason Crow ( D-CO ) , a House Armed Services Committee member and former Army Ranger .
Still , there ’ s a small , concerted effort to support the president , even if success seems like a long shot .
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy ( R-CA ) said he doesn ’ t support overriding Trump ’ s veto , which could convince others to side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( R-KY ) already tried to stop the NDAA over a provision that could delay the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan .
It ’ s therefore worth going over the president ’ s shifting rationales for blocking the authorization bill , and why he keeps changing his main message for why he wants to strike the NDAA down .
Trump ’ s three very different reasons for threatening to veto the NDAA As the nation contended with systemic racism after the killing of George Floyd this summer , the US Army opened the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ posts named after Confederate leaders .
Lawmakers , namely Sen. Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) , thought it was long past time to do so and placed a provision in the NDAA to have the Confederate generals ’ names , likenesses , and other Confederate paraphernalia permanently barred from those bases within three years .
Trump has continuously blasted the idea , though , and promised to veto the bill if it included Warren ’ s provision .
Through tweets and official White House statements , the president has argued that renaming the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ service members who deployed from there during World War II and other battles .
It ’ s possible Trump truly felt that way , but most experts at the time said the president was trying to rally his base ahead of a tough reelection fight .
After all , two of those bases are located in the swing state of Georgia , as well as one each in North Carolina and Texas , which before the November vote many thought might tilt Democratic .
But Trump ’ s argument didn ’ t work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bases made it into current the version of the NDAA .
Seeing a lack of progress with the Confederate play , Trump tried killing the bill by calling for it to contain a repeal of Section 230 , which Recode ’ s Sara Morrison described as “ the legal backbone of the internet ” and “ the pillar of internet free speech.
” Basically , the 30-year-old law protects internet platforms from liability for many of the things third parties say or do on them .
If it were to be repealed , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proved instrumental in the president ’ s rise — couldn ’ t operate as they do now .
But Trump doesn ’ t like the law because it allows others to criticize him on those platforms , and doesn ’ t stop those platforms from labeling some of Trump ’ s statements as misinformation .
As a result , he threatened to veto the NDAA over the issue .
Trump has received bipartisan support for changes to Section 230 , though Democrats and Republicans differ over why and how .
The problem for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the NDAA to take up that debate .
“ The president knows that I agree with him 100 percent on the need for a full repeal of Section 230 , ” said Sen. Jim Inhofe ( R-OK ) , chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee ( SASC ) , said in a statement earlier this month .
“ It ’ s unfortunate that Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle disagree with the need for a full repeal — but , because of that , it is impossible to add @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defense authorization bill.
” Congress , then , didn ’ t cave to Trump ’ s demands , and the NDAA doesn ’ t contain a provision to repeal Section 230 .
Which explains why Trump is pushing a new main argument now : The defense authorization bill isn ’ t tough enough on China .
It ’ s unsurprising that the president would play this card , as he knows there ’ s a bipartisan consensus on the need to confront Beijing .
But even this effort probably won ’ t work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a former Republican staffer on the Senate Armed Services Committee who is now at the American Enterprise Institute , told me “ this is the most important and substantive NDAA on China in two decades , so the Trump administration claim that he is vetoing because this is weak on China is bizarre.
” There are many ways the bill is tough on China , but the most prominent is that it establishes a “ Pacific Deterrence Initiative.
” Funded at $ 2.2 billion , it ’ s billed as a new way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ available to counter China ’ s military goals .
“ The Pacific Deterrence Initiative will enhance budgetary transparency and oversight , and focus resources on key military capabilities to deter China , ” Inhofe and Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed , the top SASC Democrat , wrote in War on the Rocks in May .
“ The initiative will also reassure U.S. allies and partners , and send a strong signal to the Chinese Communist Party that the American people are committed to defending U.S. interests in the Indo-Pacific.
” However , some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he makes at least one good point on China and the NDAA .
There was hope that the bill would include a ban on purchases of Chinese drone technology by federal agencies or with federal funds , but it didn ’ t make it into the version of the bill that passed both chambers .
That made DJI , the world ’ s largest drone manufacturer , headquartered in China , very happy .
“ We are pleased to see that the NDAA conferees took seriously the many concerns voiced by federal agencies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ universities and end users — all of which have indicated a country of origin ban would have serious , unintended consequences , ” read a statement by the company last week .
For the moment , it appears both the Senate and House have the two-thirds majority necessary to override the president ’ s potential veto .
That ’ s good news for many , namely service members who could lose out on a 3 percent pay raise if the bill doesn ’ t become law and defense contractors that would miss out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawmakers like Crow , the House Armed Services Committee Democrat , worry increased pressure from the president and Congressional leaders could change that calculus .
“ It ’ s always a concern in this era , ” he told me .
Many Trump allies prefer “ showing more support for the president than fulfilling their independent obligations as members of Congress.
” Crow doesn ’ t want to see that happen : “ We have to be supporting those who are supporting us .
”

First, President Donald Trump threatened to veto the annual defense bill because lawmakers wanted the names of Confederate generals removed from US Army bases.
Then, he said he’d torpedo the bipartisan legislation unless it repealed an internet free-speech law, allowing him to spew conspiracy theories on the internet unchallenged. And on Sunday, he pledged to block the bill because it’s not tough enough on China, despite it having what one Democratic Congressional aide described to me as “the strongest provisions ever to address the rising power.”
Despite the jumble of justifications, making Trump look unserious, what he’s promising to do has far-reaching consequences — potentially harming military members, their families, and Trump’s own reputation in the process.
Among many other things, the $741 billion National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) includes pay raises for US troops, billions for a counter-China fund, and military construction projects that pour money into local economies. Those provisions are why the Republican-controlled Senate and Democrat-led House overwhelmingly passed the bill last week, continuing a decades-long streak of approval.
But Trump wants to kill this version of the NDAA — a bold play, as both chambers okayed the law with veto-proof majorities last week. They’ll be able to override a Trump veto if those margins hold, possibly dealing the president a stinging rebuke as his administration winds down.
It helps explain why Trump is lunging for something — anything — that would get lawmakers to meet his demand to kill the bill. His messaging so far hasn’t gained any traction, perhaps because the main three points he’s making haven’t found a large audience in Congress.
“I don’t think Donald Trump knows what he’s talking about,” said Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), a House Armed Services Committee member and former Army Ranger.
Still, there’s a small, concerted effort to support the president, even if success seems like a long shot. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said he doesn’t support overriding Trump’s veto, which could convince others to side with him, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) already tried to stop the NDAA over a provision that could delay the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.
It’s therefore worth going over the president’s shifting rationales for blocking the authorization bill, and why he keeps changing his main message for why he wants to strike the NDAA down.
Trump’s three very different reasons for threatening to veto the NDAA
As the nation contended with systemic racism after the killing of George Floyd this summer, the US Army opened the door to possibly renaming 10 US Army posts named after Confederate leaders. Lawmakers, namely Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), thought it was long past time to do so and placed a provision in the NDAA to have the Confederate generals’ names, likenesses, and other Confederate paraphernalia permanently barred from those bases within three years.
Trump has continuously blasted the idea, though, and promised to veto the bill if it included Warren’s provision. Through tweets and official White House statements, the president has argued that renaming the bases would somehow diminish the accomplishment of service members who deployed from there during World War II and other battles.
I will Veto the Defense Authorization Bill if the Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren (of all people!) Amendment, which will lead to the renaming (plus other bad things!) of Fort Bragg, Fort Robert E. Lee, and many other Military Bases from which we won Two World Wars, is in the Bill! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 1, 2020
It’s possible Trump truly felt that way, but most experts at the time said the president was trying to rally his base ahead of a tough reelection fight. After all, two of those bases are located in the swing state of Georgia, as well as one each in North Carolina and Texas, which before the November vote many thought might tilt Democratic.
But Trump’s argument didn’t work, and the provision to rename those bases made it into current the version of the NDAA.
Seeing a lack of progress with the Confederate play, Trump tried killing the bill by calling for it to contain a repeal of Section 230, which Recode’s Sara Morrison described as “the legal backbone of the internet” and “the pillar of internet free speech.”
Basically, the 30-year-old law protects internet platforms from liability for many of the things third parties say or do on them. If it were to be repealed, companies like Facebook and Twitter — which proved instrumental in the president’s rise — couldn’t operate as they do now.
But Trump doesn’t like the law because it allows others to criticize him on those platforms, and doesn’t stop those platforms from labeling some of Trump’s statements as misinformation.
As a result, he threatened to veto the NDAA over the issue.
.....Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill when sent to the very beautiful Resolute desk. Take back America NOW. Thank you! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2020
Trump has received bipartisan support for changes to Section 230, though Democrats and Republicans differ over why and how. The problem for the president is few want to use the NDAA to take up that debate.
“The president knows that I agree with him 100 percent on the need for a full repeal of Section 230,” said Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK), chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), said in a statement earlier this month. “It’s unfortunate that Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle disagree with the need for a full repeal — but, because of that, it is impossible to add a repeal of Section 230 to the defense authorization bill.”
Congress, then, didn’t cave to Trump’s demands, and the NDAA doesn’t contain a provision to repeal Section 230.
Which explains why Trump is pushing a new main argument now: The defense authorization bill isn’t tough enough on China. It’s unsurprising that the president would play this card, as he knows there’s a bipartisan consensus on the need to confront Beijing.
THE BIGGEST WINNER OF OUR NEW DEFENSE BILL IS CHINA!. I WILL VETO! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 13, 2020
But even this effort probably won’t work, experts say. Eric Sayers, a former Republican staffer on the Senate Armed Services Committee who is now at the American Enterprise Institute, told me “this is the most important and substantive NDAA on China in two decades, so the Trump administration claim that he is vetoing because this is weak on China is bizarre.”
There are many ways the bill is tough on China, but the most prominent is that it establishes a “Pacific Deterrence Initiative.” Funded at $2.2 billion, it’s billed as a new way to ensure the US has the resources available to counter China’s military goals.
“The Pacific Deterrence Initiative will enhance budgetary transparency and oversight, and focus resources on key military capabilities to deter China,” Inhofe and Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top SASC Democrat, wrote in War on the Rocks in May. “The initiative will also reassure U.S. allies and partners, and send a strong signal to the Chinese Communist Party that the American people are committed to defending U.S. interests in the Indo-Pacific.”
However, some in the president’s orbit say he makes at least one good point on China and the NDAA. There was hope that the bill would include a ban on purchases of Chinese drone technology by federal agencies or with federal funds, but it didn’t make it into the version of the bill that passed both chambers. That made DJI, the world’s largest drone manufacturer, headquartered in China, very happy.
“We are pleased to see that the NDAA conferees took seriously the many concerns voiced by federal agencies, American companies, industry groups, universities and end users — all of which have indicated a country of origin ban would have serious, unintended consequences,” read a statement by the company last week.
For the moment, it appears both the Senate and House have the two-thirds majority necessary to override the president’s potential veto. That’s good news for many, namely service members who could lose out on a 3 percent pay raise if the bill doesn’t become law and defense contractors that would miss out on billions in revenue.
Still, lawmakers like Crow, the House Armed Services Committee Democrat, worry increased pressure from the president and Congressional leaders could change that calculus. “It’s always a concern in this era,” he told me. Many Trump allies prefer “showing more support for the president than fulfilling their independent obligations as members of Congress.”
Crow doesn’t want to see that happen: “We have to be supporting those who are supporting us.”


vox--2020-12-14--Tech billionaire Larry Ellison has moved to Hawaii

Larry Ellison , one of the world ’ s wealthiest people , has moved to the state of Hawaii .
He ’ s the latest billionaire to leave California in 2020 .
Ellison , the founder of the software giant Oracle , made the disclosure to employees in a company-wide note on Monday afternoon after Oracle announced that it was moving its headquarters to Austin , Texas .
“ Following Friday ’ s announcement ...
I ’ ve received a number of inquiries about whether or not I will be moving to Texas , ” Ellison wrote .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moved to the state of Hawaii and I ’ ll be using the power of Zoom to work from the island of Lanai , ” he added , signing off the email with a “ Mahalo.
” Ellison , who , more than most tech billionaires , enjoys the high life , owns almost the entire island of Lanai , which he has tried to develop as an environmental and agricultural utopia .
He recently launched a new wellness company based on Lanai called Sensei , and the remote island is heavily shaped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In recent weeks , Ellison ’ s allies and corporations have had to manage a coronavirus outbreak on the island .
Ellison ’ s announcement comes just days after Elon Musk , a close associate of Ellison ’ s , confirmed that he had moved to Texas in part because of Tesla ’ s and SpaceX ’ s business operations .
A number of tech billionaires have voiced discontent with California ’ s business climate and tax policies , which would matter tremendously to someone like Ellison , who has a net worth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California has also been more stringent than other states with its Covid-related restrictions , which has angered Musk .
Ellison has said little about his feelings on those policies , but he has emerged of late as a rare Silicon Valley ally of Donald Trump .
Early in the pandemic , Ellison advocated for Trump to push for hydroxychloroquine , a drug with unproven benefits against Covid-19 , as a possible treatment for those with the disease .

Larry Ellison, one of the world’s wealthiest people, has moved to the state of Hawaii, Recode has learned. He’s the latest billionaire to leave California in 2020.
Ellison, the founder of the software giant Oracle, made the disclosure to employees in a company-wide note on Monday afternoon after Oracle announced that it was moving its headquarters to Austin, Texas.
“Following Friday’s announcement ... I’ve received a number of inquiries about whether or not I will be moving to Texas,” Ellison wrote. “The answer is no. I’ve moved to the state of Hawaii and I’ll be using the power of Zoom to work from the island of Lanai,” he added, signing off the email with a “Mahalo.”
Ellison, who, more than most tech billionaires, enjoys the high life, owns almost the entire island of Lanai, which he has tried to develop as an environmental and agricultural utopia. He recently launched a new wellness company based on Lanai called Sensei, and the remote island is heavily shaped by his business and philanthropic decisions. In recent weeks, Ellison’s allies and corporations have had to manage a coronavirus outbreak on the island.
Ellison’s announcement comes just days after Elon Musk, a close associate of Ellison’s, confirmed that he had moved to Texas in part because of Tesla’s and SpaceX’s business operations. A number of tech billionaires have voiced discontent with California’s business climate and tax policies, which would matter tremendously to someone like Ellison, who has a net worth of more than $80 billion.
California has also been more stringent than other states with its Covid-related restrictions, which has angered Musk. Ellison has said little about his feelings on those policies, but he has emerged of late as a rare Silicon Valley ally of Donald Trump. Early in the pandemic, Ellison advocated for Trump to push for hydroxychloroquine, a drug with unproven benefits against Covid-19, as a possible treatment for those with the disease.
Oracle didn’t respond to a request for comment.


vox--2020-12-15--The 15 best books our book critic read this year

I didn ’ t read as much as I ’ d have liked to this year .
But also it sometimes feels as if all I did this year was read .
When Vox ’ s New York office closed in March , I surveyed my bookshelf full of galleys and selected a handful that were due to come out over the course of the month .
I looked at all the ones I had piled up for April , and thought about adding a few of those to my stack , just in case — but then I thought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the subway and decided against it .
So I left them all there , all the galleys I had accumulated and sorted by publication date , from April ’ s new releases to August ’ s , waiting fresh and expectant on the office bookshelf .
As far as I know , they are there still .
Sometimes I panic , thinking about all those books waiting for me to read them .
The ones I never picked up and never opened and will have to donate to some worthy cause as soon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so I can make room for next year ’ s books .
If I ever do get back .
There are so many books that came out in 2020 that I just never picked up .
A lot of them were probably very good .
They ’ ve been ignored , underread , abandoned by a media that hasn ’ t given books the space they deserve in a year when our focus was mostly elsewhere .
But there were times this year when I didn ’ t have space in my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like it was shattered .
The first week of lockdown , I read a lot .
What else was I going to do , I thought ; I couldn ’ t leave my apartment .
I set up a nest on my fire escape and listened to sirens and read with half my attention .
I couldn ’ t bring myself into the state of mind with which I try to read books that I want to cover — transparent , so I ’ m not bringing my own preoccupations to the text @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book was engaging enough , I could still get through it .
By the next week I had started to grasp that lockdown was going to last a lot longer than two weeks , and then I stopped being able to read .
I stopped being able to do anything but doomscroll through Twitter .
Books will save you , I told myself .
They will nourish your mind and your soul .
They will give you a space away from the rest of the world , for now , when you can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And when you ’ re ready , they will give you a space to understand the world .
I write about books because I genuinely believe all those statements to be true .
But it takes energy to let a book save you .
I didn ’ t have that energy .
I built up to it slowly .
I read trashy fanfiction .
( Good fanfiction exists , but the stuff I was reading in April was trashy . )
I read old children ’ s books .
I read old cookbooks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ awhile I was able to start reading new books again .
Not as many as I would have before : There are still so many titles that came out this year that I missed .
But I was right .
Books did save me .
These are the books that came out in 2020 and got me through the year .
Like all “ best of ” lists , it is heavily subjective , but these 15 novels and memoirs helped take me outside of myself when I needed to be elsewhere , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understood the world better , or could leave it behind when I had to .
I hope they will help you too as we move into 2021 .
Brit Bennett ’ s rich and lovely sophomore novel , The Vanishing Half , tells the story of identical twin sisters from a color-struck town .
The entire population of Mallard , Louisiana , is Black , and its residents have devoted themselves to trying to make their skin as fair as possible .
Our twin sisters grow up in this town — their father @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fair skin having failed to protect him — and then proceed to take wildly divergent paths through life .
One sister leaves the colorism of her childhood life behind to marry the darkest-skinned man she can find .
The other marries a white man and starts passing for white .
What ensues is a layered and extravagant fairy tale that tracks America ’ s ideas about race and Blackness across decades , and somehow manages to find a possibility of redemption at the end .
Sometimes You Have to Lie : The Life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Author of Harriet the Spy by Leslie Brody Brash , bold , and belligerent , Louise Fitzhugh ’ s Harriet the Spy is one of the great heroines of American children ’ s literature , and possibly just of American literature , full stop .
The image of Harriet sitting in a drugstore , nursing an egg cream and taking meticulous notes on every conversation around her is so indelible that I am compelled to order an egg cream every time I see one on a menu , even though they are actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Have to Lie , Leslie Brody paints a portrait of Fitzhugh that ’ s almost as indelible as Harriet herself .
Fitzhugh apparently lived a life of whirlwind glamour , beginning from her birth as the daughter of a Southern aristocrat and a jazz dancer ; continuing through her days traveling Europe to learn how to paint Italian frescoes and smoke in Parisian gay bars ; and into her time as an out lesbian artist living in New York ’ s West Village , learning how to write from a pulp novelist who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In Brody ’ s hands , even Fitzhugh ’ s clothes ( Brooks Brothers menswear , combat boots , and a cape ) are over-the-top marvelous .
Sometimes You Have to Lie is a deeply endearing introduction to the woman who gave the American canon one of its icons .
Piranesi haunts me .
When I read the book , I wanted to let it swallow me whole .
It ’ s one of the best books I read this year , and maybe just one of the best books I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about a man who is called Piranesi , although that is not his name .
He lives in a world that consists of a vast , endless marble hall that goes on and on for miles in all directions , flooded with water and populated by broken statues ; the vibe is part Borges , part C.S .
Lewis .
Piranesi calls this hall the House , and understands himself to be the Beloved Child of the House .
He navigates his way through this strange world with a kind of radiant innocence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quite quickly that Piranesi is a prisoner in this world , and that his naiveté does him a disservice .
Less quickly , it emerges that Piranesi ’ s naiveté is what allows him to transcend his prison and experience his world as a gift .
The project of this novel , and what gives it its strange power , is finding a way to bridge those two truths .
“ Bro !
Tell me we still know how to talk about kings !
” begins Maria Dahvana Headley in her profane and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Beowulf is word-drunk .
It puns and plays obsessively with language , with its Old English root words and its slangy modern-day English : characters “ unexpectedly stan ” for Beowulf , while Beowulf himself “ began , sick-hearted , to hear his death knell , his sure feet fumbling , his fight-spirit fugitive.
” It is also recognizably a woman ’ s Beowulf .
The female characters in this translation are given more space to explore their powers than other translators traditionally grant them .
And femininity seeps into places @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go looking for it : The dragon becomes female , and the battles Beowulf and his men fight are laced with imagery of captive women and miscarrying women .
There are dozens of Beowulf translations out there .
But Headley ’ s is the funniest and most vivid of the ones I ’ ve read .
Mexican Gothic is a creepy , elegant riff on the postcolonial gothic .
It begins in a decaying English manor that sits in solitary splendor , slowly rotting , above the Mexican mining town of El Triunfo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to run a silver mine and steal the land ’ s riches — but now the mine is defunct , the people of the town are unemployed , and the English remain locked up alone in their mansion .
So when the cosmopolitan young Mexico City socialite Noemí comes to El Triunfo , she will have to learn the manor ’ s secrets .
And , inevitably , she will learn that the true source of the gothic in the living nightmare in which she finds herself is colonialism .
Mexican Gothic is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book .
Read it with the lights on .
The City We Became by N.K .
Jemisin The City We Became has the misfortune of using a malignant , infectious virus spreading across New York as one of its central metaphors ; it also had the misfortune of debuting in April , just as the pandemic had New York City in its grips .
But to Jemisin ’ s immense credit , The City We Became never felt too soon or too sad .
Instead , it ’ s a joyful book , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they will endure .
The City We Became is the first volume of a planned trilogy — one that posits that when a city becomes strong enough , when enough people live there that the place seems to have developed its own personality , then that city comes to life .
It develops a human avatar , who embodies the city and its interests .
In The City We Became , New York City comes to life — and then something goes terribly wrong , and its avatar ends up in a coma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the avatars of the city ’ s five boroughs to save him , and to help protect New York from the forces of assimilation , gentrification , and white supremacy , all of which are spreading , virus-like , across its bounds .
You will have a blast reading this book .
And then you will also have a blast arguing about who the avatar is for your favorite city .
( Personally , I have only grown to feel more strongly this year that the avatar of my hometown , Philadelphia , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Shock and Discredit You by Danny M. Lavery There are few subsections of the internet that I miss in the way I miss The Toast , the extremely niche humor-and-feminism-and-weird-old-science-fiction-and-assorted-other-stuff website created by Danny M. Lavery and Nicole Cliffe .
And an enormous part of what made the site work was the specificity of voice developed by Lavery , who is probably one of the most skilled writers I know of at wielding “ extremely specific , but somehow deeply relatable ” as his weapon of choice .
Like : Have I ever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Pink is a lesbian ?
No , I ’ m not that funny .
But once you ’ ve said it , do I get it ?
Oh , I absolutely do .
In his memoir Something That May Shock and Discredit You , Lavery , who is now Slate ’ s Dear Prudence , returns to his Toast roots .
Something That May Shock and Discredit You is a transition memoir ( Lavery is transgender ) , and it ’ s also a gleeful , incredibly specific and improbably deeply relatable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a Black woman living in Brooklyn and working a crappy publishing admin job .
Out of a combination of boredom and self-loathing , she ’ s slept with most of the men at her company , including the boss who eventually fires her .
At the end of her rope , Edie moves in with her much older married lover Eric , who is white — and his wife Rebecca and their Black daughter , Akila .
Rebecca knows exactly who Edie is .
Akila has no idea , and feels skeptical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this slightly surreal ménage à trois .
Eric fades into the background as Rebecca , a medical examiner with “ chunky , tragic sneakers and freaky competence , ” becomes fascinated with Edie .
She takes Edie along to the office to watch as she performs autopsies .
She suggests that Edie might be a good role model for Akila , who is lonely as the only Black kid in a mostly white suburb .
Leilani tracks these shifting psychosexual relationships with detached , surgical prose .
( At 29 , she ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rooney-esque wunderkind . )
And Edie is a beautifully morbid character , prone to remarking , when a child annoys her , of how glad she is she got an abortion several years before .
But for my money , what makes Luster sing most is its evocation of all the tawdry , banal details of Edie ’ s crappy Brooklyn life : the roach-ridden Bushwick apartment , the grimy heat of a New York summer , the way her supposedly woke industry treats her with palpable contempt for being Black and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the free hand lotion the publisher started putting out , ” she writes early on , “ after it was revealed that the women in the company ( a whopping 87 percent of the employee base ) are still making less than the men.
” When I read that passage , I immediately took a picture and sent it to a coworker .
“ Free hand lotion but make it organic tampons , ” she wrote back .
We all know these infuriating details .
Luster makes them shine .
The Mirror and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the Light is a deeply immersive book , the kind of book that asks you to swim down through its many levels every time you open it up , and then when you close it again it takes you a while to resurface into reality .
It ’ s the third volume in Mantel ’ s acclaimed Wolf Hall trilogy , and it covers the end of the life of Thomas Cromwell , chief fixer to Henry VIII .
In the two earlier volumes , cosmopolitan young commoner Thomas Cromwell accumulated power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acquired and disposed of the king ’ s wives .
But in this third volume , Cromwell himself — whose power depends on the king ’ s goodwill — finds himself in the same position as all those long-suffering wives .
He has lost the king ’ s good favor , and death , inevitably , awaits him .
But Cromwell isn ’ t about to go down without a fight .
The whole Wolf Hall trilogy taken together forms a portrait of a man ’ s inner self , and it makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and corroded by the pursuit of power .
The Mirror and the Light brings home the chilling consequences .
The first volume of Barack Obama ’ s planned two-volume presidential memoir is unusually ambivalent for books in its genre .
Presidential memoirs are usually about presidents defending their legacies , and on one hand , Obama follows through on that goal .
He argues strenuously that he always made the best of a bad set of choices , that he saved the country from the brink of ruin , that he led a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ else , in his shoes , could have .
But on the other hand , Obama continuously runs up against the question of how the racist backlash to his presidency birthed the disastrous presidency of Donald Trump — and the question of whether Obama himself , in turn , can be said to bear any responsibility for what has followed .
He doesn ’ t ever seem able to answer those questions to his own satisfaction .
But some of A Promised Land ’ s most poignant passages come when Obama muses over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presidency has robbed him of his ability to connect with people , and whether he would have been able , as a junior senator from Illinois , to sit down one-on-one with all the Tea Partiers who thought he was a secret Muslim and talk his way to an understanding with them .
A Promised Land is written for the historical record first and with an eye to an engaging reading experience second .
It can sometimes be a slog .
But it ’ s essential for understanding the shining hope of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what developed out of those years when those in charge weren ’ t looking .
Such a Fun Age is one of the most fun books I read this year .
It tackles heavy topics — racism , misogyny , cancel culture — but it does so with such deftness that it never feels weighed down by its own self-importance .
This social satire is breezy .
It concerns Emira , a 26-year-old Black woman who becomes the center of a scandal when a racist security guard accuses her of kidnapping her 3-year-old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the incident , the white people around Emira begin clamoring at her to validate them for the way they respond .
They need her , with a deep ferocity , to assure them that they are good white people .
That they are not racist .
That they are , by virtue of their proximity to her , cool .
And as Emira tries to navigate the ensuing chaos , Reid develops a biting satire of both woke white bros and banal , corporate-friendly white-lady feminism .
The result is a romp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , corporate-friendly white-lady feminism !
Self Care begins with Maren , one of its two protagonists , lying on one of her office ’ s lavender velvet chaises , drinking wine out of a mug that says “ MALE TEARS ” and compulsively hate-reading her mentions after she tweeted something mean at Ivanka Trump .
Maren is one of the founders of a self-care app called Richual , where users track their meditation practices and sleep hygiene , read recurring features called “ Healing Crystal or Dildo of Antiquity ?
” and buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tint that also raises cancer awareness .
Influencers get extra perks if they ’ re willing to share stories of personal trauma .
Maren ’ s the self-hating workaholic of the Richual leadership team .
Her co-founder Devin , Self Care ’ s second protagonist , is also a self-hating workaholic , but in more of an Instagram way than a Twitter way : She arrives to comfort Maren over her Twitter trolls after getting out of a yoga class where she does down dog burpees until she screams “ I MISS MY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Devin is the face of Richual , and the “ after ” picture for posts about their 30-day cleanse .
Maren , who is “ smart enough to retweet [ her ] rape threats , ” is the brains .
Stein is taking a vicious , unforgiving swipe at the monetization of feminism and wellness and trauma and self-care here .
This is the book you should read if your Instagram ads just tried to get you to buy a millennial pink thong that says “ pussy grabs back ” on the front @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of enormous restraint and precision .
It deals with Wallace , a gay Black biochemistry grad student who is slogging his way painfully through a tedious experiment on nematodes while he skips the funeral for his abusive father .
Wallace is depressed and trying very hard not to feel anything at all , and part of what gives Real Life its power is the way the prose , in turn , skirts around Wallace ’ s feelings .
Instead , it gives us his observations , rendered with all the cool detachment he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aloe , wet and clear .
The sunscreen cool in his palm.
” But Wallace can ’ t entirely avoid his feelings when he embarks on a tryst with Miller , one of his straight white friends .
Over the course of the three-day span that makes up the novel , their affair mingles violence and tenderness , and it ’ s in this fraught romance that Wallace at last must stop hiding behind his scientific detachment .
And Taylor ’ s prose , in turn , slips inevitably from detached observations into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Will by Jo Walton Or What You Will is a frothy and playful fantasy novel from Jo Walton that is so much fun to read , it takes a while to realize how existential it is .
It ’ s narrated by a spirit who is living in the back of the mind of an aging author named Sylvia .
The spirit is a character in some of Sylvia ’ s books , and also a representation of the creative part of her mind .
But — crucially — the spirit is also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ separate existence from Sylvia ’ s .
Sylvia is reaching the end of her life now , and the spirit is worried that he will die with her .
So he wants Sylvia to write them both into the world of a new book , one where they will never die .
My favorite part of Or What You Will is how skillfully it manipulated me .
The novel ’ s final pages are , more or less , a reveal .
But Walton had somehow incepted the information that she was gearing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the course of the book , without ever doing anything so clumsy or gauche as to hint at it .
When she finally confirmed what she had already somehow pushed me to know , the moment was so cathartic that it made me cry .
Uncanny Valley is a memoir about the tech world , written for liberal arts skeptics .
It ’ s not out to convince us we ’ re wrong , so much as it aims to convince us we ’ re not skeptical enough .
Wiener moves to Silicon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refugee from publishing , looking for a job that will suit her ambitions .
Over the course of the decade , she works her way through a series of Bay Area startups , always on the “ soft skills ” side , where the engineers treat her with amiable condescension .
She is excited by tech ’ s utopian rhetoric and eager to please .
One young CEO remarks approvingly that she is “ DFTC ” : Down For The Cause .
Another advises her she should learn JavaScript , and suggests she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But as Wiener entrenches herself deeper into Silicon Valley , she watches the industry ’ s ostensible ambitions curdle into something darker .
Tech startups , she concludes , are skillful at talking about themselves as scrappy underdogs — but what they are really interested in is acquiring power , and they are pursuing that goal assiduously .
And Wiener , whose “ soft skills ” include a razor-sharp prose style with a cutting eye for detail , shows us the all-too-human costs .

I didn’t read as much as I’d have liked to this year. But also it sometimes feels as if all I did this year was read.
When Vox’s New York office closed in March, I surveyed my bookshelf full of galleys and selected a handful that were due to come out over the course of the month. I looked at all the ones I had piled up for April, and thought about adding a few of those to my stack, just in case — but then I thought about lugging all those heavy books onto the subway and decided against it.
So I left them all there, all the galleys I had accumulated and sorted by publication date, from April’s new releases to August’s, waiting fresh and expectant on the office bookshelf. As far as I know, they are there still.
Sometimes I panic, thinking about all those books waiting for me to read them. The ones I never picked up and never opened and will have to donate to some worthy cause as soon as I get back to the office, so I can make room for next year’s books. If I ever do get back.
There are so many books that came out in 2020 that I just never picked up. A lot of them were probably very good. They’ve been ignored, underread, abandoned by a media that hasn’t given books the space they deserve in a year when our focus was mostly elsewhere.
But there were times this year when I didn’t have space in my mind for anything new. I felt like it was shattered.
The first week of lockdown, I read a lot. What else was I going to do, I thought; I couldn’t leave my apartment. I set up a nest on my fire escape and listened to sirens and read with half my attention. I couldn’t bring myself into the state of mind with which I try to read books that I want to cover — transparent, so I’m not bringing my own preoccupations to the text as I read — but when a book was engaging enough, I could still get through it.
By the next week I had started to grasp that lockdown was going to last a lot longer than two weeks, and then I stopped being able to read. I stopped being able to do anything but doomscroll through Twitter.
Books will save you, I told myself. They will nourish your mind and your soul. They will give you a space away from the rest of the world, for now, when you can’t deal with the world. And when you’re ready, they will give you a space to understand the world.
I write about books because I genuinely believe all those statements to be true. But it takes energy to let a book save you. I didn’t have that energy.
I built up to it slowly. I read trashy fanfiction. (Good fanfiction exists, but the stuff I was reading in April was trashy.) I read old children’s books. I read old cookbooks. I read Jane Austen.
After awhile I was able to start reading new books again. Not as many as I would have before: There are still so many titles that came out this year that I missed. But I was right. Books did save me.
These are the books that came out in 2020 and got me through the year. Like all “best of” lists, it is heavily subjective, but these 15 novels and memoirs helped take me outside of myself when I needed to be elsewhere, and made me feel that I either understood the world better, or could leave it behind when I had to. I hope they will help you too as we move into 2021.
Related Join the Vox Book Club
The Vanishing Half by Brit Bennett
Brit Bennett’s rich and lovely sophomore novel, The Vanishing Half, tells the story of identical twin sisters from a color-struck town.
The entire population of Mallard, Louisiana, is Black, and its residents have devoted themselves to trying to make their skin as fair as possible. Our twin sisters grow up in this town — their father was lynched by white people, his fair skin having failed to protect him — and then proceed to take wildly divergent paths through life.
One sister leaves the colorism of her childhood life behind to marry the darkest-skinned man she can find. The other marries a white man and starts passing for white.
What ensues is a layered and extravagant fairy tale that tracks America’s ideas about race and Blackness across decades, and somehow manages to find a possibility of redemption at the end.
Related Brit Bennett on publishing The Vanishing Half during the George Floyd protests
Sometimes You Have to Lie: The Life and Times of Louise Fitzhugh, Renegade Author of Harriet the Spy by Leslie Brody
Brash, bold, and belligerent, Louise Fitzhugh’s Harriet the Spy is one of the great heroines of American children’s literature, and possibly just of American literature, full stop. The image of Harriet sitting in a drugstore, nursing an egg cream and taking meticulous notes on every conversation around her is so indelible that I am compelled to order an egg cream every time I see one on a menu, even though they are actually a little disgusting.
In Sometimes You Have to Lie, Leslie Brody paints a portrait of Fitzhugh that’s almost as indelible as Harriet herself. Fitzhugh apparently lived a life of whirlwind glamour, beginning from her birth as the daughter of a Southern aristocrat and a jazz dancer; continuing through her days traveling Europe to learn how to paint Italian frescoes and smoke in Parisian gay bars; and into her time as an out lesbian artist living in New York’s West Village, learning how to write from a pulp novelist who was also Patricia Highsmith’s lover. In Brody’s hands, even Fitzhugh’s clothes (Brooks Brothers menswear, combat boots, and a cape) are over-the-top marvelous. Sometimes You Have to Lie is a deeply endearing introduction to the woman who gave the American canon one of its icons.
Piranesi by Susanna Clarke
Piranesi haunts me. When I read the book, I wanted to let it swallow me whole. It’s one of the best books I read this year, and maybe just one of the best books I’ve read, ever.
Piranesi is about a man who is called Piranesi, although that is not his name. He lives in a world that consists of a vast, endless marble hall that goes on and on for miles in all directions, flooded with water and populated by broken statues; the vibe is part Borges, part C.S. Lewis. Piranesi calls this hall the House, and understands himself to be the Beloved Child of the House. He navigates his way through this strange world with a kind of radiant innocence.
It becomes clear to the reader quite quickly that Piranesi is a prisoner in this world, and that his naiveté does him a disservice. Less quickly, it emerges that Piranesi’s naiveté is what allows him to transcend his prison and experience his world as a gift. The project of this novel, and what gives it its strange power, is finding a way to bridge those two truths.
Beowulf translated by Maria Dahvana Headley
“Bro! Tell me we still know how to talk about kings!” begins Maria Dahvana Headley in her profane and lively new translation of Beowulf.
Headley’s Beowulf is word-drunk. It puns and plays obsessively with language, with its Old English root words and its slangy modern-day English: characters “unexpectedly stan” for Beowulf, while Beowulf himself “began, sick-hearted, to hear his death knell, his sure feet fumbling, his fight-spirit fugitive.”
It is also recognizably a woman’s Beowulf. The female characters in this translation are given more space to explore their powers than other translators traditionally grant them. And femininity seeps into places where other translators don’t usually go looking for it: The dragon becomes female, and the battles Beowulf and his men fight are laced with imagery of captive women and miscarrying women.
There are dozens of Beowulf translations out there. But Headley’s is the funniest and most vivid of the ones I’ve read.
Mexican Gothic by Silvia Moreno-Garcia
Mexican Gothic is a creepy, elegant riff on the postcolonial gothic. It begins in a decaying English manor that sits in solitary splendor, slowly rotting, above the Mexican mining town of El Triunfo. The English came to El Triunfo to run a silver mine and steal the land’s riches — but now the mine is defunct, the people of the town are unemployed, and the English remain locked up alone in their mansion.
So when the cosmopolitan young Mexico City socialite Noemí comes to El Triunfo, she will have to learn the manor’s secrets. And, inevitably, she will learn that the true source of the gothic in the living nightmare in which she finds herself is colonialism.
Mexican Gothic is a daring and witty joyride of a book. Read it with the lights on.
The City We Became by N.K. Jemisin
The City We Became has the misfortune of using a malignant, infectious virus spreading across New York as one of its central metaphors; it also had the misfortune of debuting in April, just as the pandemic had New York City in its grips. But to Jemisin’s immense credit, The City We Became never felt too soon or too sad. Instead, it’s a joyful book, about what makes cities powerful and why they will endure.
The City We Became is the first volume of a planned trilogy — one that posits that when a city becomes strong enough, when enough people live there that the place seems to have developed its own personality, then that city comes to life. It develops a human avatar, who embodies the city and its interests. In The City We Became, New York City comes to life — and then something goes terribly wrong, and its avatar ends up in a coma. Now it’s up to the avatars of the city’s five boroughs to save him, and to help protect New York from the forces of assimilation, gentrification, and white supremacy, all of which are spreading, virus-like, across its bounds.
You will have a blast reading this book. And then you will also have a blast arguing about who the avatar is for your favorite city. (Personally, I have only grown to feel more strongly this year that the avatar of my hometown, Philadelphia, is Gritty.)
Something That May Shock and Discredit You by Danny M. Lavery
There are few subsections of the internet that I miss in the way I miss The Toast, the extremely niche humor-and-feminism-and-weird-old-science-fiction-and-assorted-other-stuff website created by Danny M. Lavery and Nicole Cliffe. And an enormous part of what made the site work was the specificity of voice developed by Lavery, who is probably one of the most skilled writers I know of at wielding “extremely specific, but somehow deeply relatable” as his weapon of choice. Like: Have I ever had the thought that Duckie from Pretty in Pink is a lesbian? No, I’m not that funny. But once you’ve said it, do I get it? Oh, I absolutely do.
In his memoir Something That May Shock and Discredit You, Lavery, who is now Slate’s Dear Prudence, returns to his Toast roots. Something That May Shock and Discredit You is a transition memoir (Lavery is transgender), and it’s also a gleeful, incredibly specific and improbably deeply relatable joy-read.
Luster by Raven Leilani
Edie is 23 years old, a Black woman living in Brooklyn and working a crappy publishing admin job. Out of a combination of boredom and self-loathing, she’s slept with most of the men at her company, including the boss who eventually fires her. At the end of her rope, Edie moves in with her much older married lover Eric, who is white — and his wife Rebecca and their Black daughter, Akila. Rebecca knows exactly who Edie is. Akila has no idea, and feels skeptical.
Much of Luster is devoted to this slightly surreal ménage à trois. Eric fades into the background as Rebecca, a medical examiner with “chunky, tragic sneakers and freaky competence,” becomes fascinated with Edie. She takes Edie along to the office to watch as she performs autopsies. She suggests that Edie might be a good role model for Akila, who is lonely as the only Black kid in a mostly white suburb.
Leilani tracks these shifting psychosexual relationships with detached, surgical prose. (At 29, she’s developing a reputation as a Sally Rooney-esque wunderkind.) And Edie is a beautifully morbid character, prone to remarking, when a child annoys her, of how glad she is she got an abortion several years before.
But for my money, what makes Luster sing most is its evocation of all the tawdry, banal details of Edie’s crappy Brooklyn life: the roach-ridden Bushwick apartment, the grimy heat of a New York summer, the way her supposedly woke industry treats her with palpable contempt for being Black and a woman.
“I load up on the free hand lotion the publisher started putting out,” she writes early on, “after it was revealed that the women in the company (a whopping 87 percent of the employee base) are still making less than the men.”
When I read that passage, I immediately took a picture and sent it to a coworker. “Free hand lotion but make it organic tampons,” she wrote back.
We all know these infuriating details. Luster makes them shine.
The Mirror and the Light by Hilary Mantel
The Mirror and the Light is a deeply immersive book, the kind of book that asks you to swim down through its many levels every time you open it up, and then when you close it again it takes you a while to resurface into reality. It’s the third volume in Mantel’s acclaimed Wolf Hall trilogy, and it covers the end of the life of Thomas Cromwell, chief fixer to Henry VIII.
In the two earlier volumes, cosmopolitan young commoner Thomas Cromwell accumulated power, brought modernity to England, and acquired and disposed of the king’s wives. But in this third volume, Cromwell himself — whose power depends on the king’s goodwill — finds himself in the same position as all those long-suffering wives. He has lost the king’s good favor, and death, inevitably, awaits him. But Cromwell isn’t about to go down without a fight.
The whole Wolf Hall trilogy taken together forms a portrait of a man’s inner self, and it makes us watch as that self is corrupted and corroded by the pursuit of power. The Mirror and the Light brings home the chilling consequences.
A Promised Land by Barack Obama
The first volume of Barack Obama’s planned two-volume presidential memoir is unusually ambivalent for books in its genre.
Presidential memoirs are usually about presidents defending their legacies, and on one hand, Obama follows through on that goal. He argues strenuously that he always made the best of a bad set of choices, that he saved the country from the brink of ruin, that he led a successful administration that accomplished more than anyone else, in his shoes, could have.
But on the other hand, Obama continuously runs up against the question of how the racist backlash to his presidency birthed the disastrous presidency of Donald Trump — and the question of whether Obama himself, in turn, can be said to bear any responsibility for what has followed. He doesn’t ever seem able to answer those questions to his own satisfaction. But some of A Promised Land’s most poignant passages come when Obama muses over how the power of the office of the presidency has robbed him of his ability to connect with people, and whether he would have been able, as a junior senator from Illinois, to sit down one-on-one with all the Tea Partiers who thought he was a secret Muslim and talk his way to an understanding with them.
A Promised Land is written for the historical record first and with an eye to an engaging reading experience second. It can sometimes be a slog. But it’s essential for understanding the shining hope of those early Obama years — and exactly what developed out of those years when those in charge weren’t looking.
Such a Fun Age by Kiley Reid
Such a Fun Age is one of the most fun books I read this year. It tackles heavy topics — racism, misogyny, cancel culture — but it does so with such deftness that it never feels weighed down by its own self-importance. This social satire is breezy.
It concerns Emira, a 26-year-old Black woman who becomes the center of a scandal when a racist security guard accuses her of kidnapping her 3-year-old white babysitting charge. In the wake of the incident, the white people around Emira begin clamoring at her to validate them for the way they respond. They need her, with a deep ferocity, to assure them that they are good white people. That they are not racist. That they are, by virtue of their proximity to her, cool. And as Emira tries to navigate the ensuing chaos, Reid develops a biting satire of both woke white bros and banal, corporate-friendly white-lady feminism. The result is a romp, with teeth.
Self Care by Leigh Stein
Speaking of banal, corporate-friendly white-lady feminism! Self Care begins with Maren, one of its two protagonists, lying on one of her office’s lavender velvet chaises, drinking wine out of a mug that says “MALE TEARS” and compulsively hate-reading her mentions after she tweeted something mean at Ivanka Trump.
Maren is one of the founders of a self-care app called Richual, where users track their meditation practices and sleep hygiene, read recurring features called “Healing Crystal or Dildo of Antiquity?” and buy snail serums and vape pens and cheek tint that also raises cancer awareness. Influencers get extra perks if they’re willing to share stories of personal trauma.
Maren’s the self-hating workaholic of the Richual leadership team. Her co-founder Devin, Self Care’s second protagonist, is also a self-hating workaholic, but in more of an Instagram way than a Twitter way: She arrives to comfort Maren over her Twitter trolls after getting out of a yoga class where she does down dog burpees until she screams “I MISS MY DAD” and then blacks out. Devin is the face of Richual, and the “after” picture for posts about their 30-day cleanse. Maren, who is “smart enough to retweet [her] rape threats,” is the brains.
Stein is taking a vicious, unforgiving swipe at the monetization of feminism and wellness and trauma and self-care here. This is the book you should read if your Instagram ads just tried to get you to buy a millennial pink thong that says “pussy grabs back” on the front.
Real Life by Brandon Taylor
Real Life is a campus novel of enormous restraint and precision. It deals with Wallace, a gay Black biochemistry grad student who is slogging his way painfully through a tedious experiment on nematodes while he skips the funeral for his abusive father. Wallace is depressed and trying very hard not to feel anything at all, and part of what gives Real Life its power is the way the prose, in turn, skirts around Wallace’s feelings. Instead, it gives us his observations, rendered with all the cool detachment he can muster: “The scent of aloe, wet and clear. The sunscreen cool in his palm.”
But Wallace can’t entirely avoid his feelings when he embarks on a tryst with Miller, one of his straight white friends. Over the course of the three-day span that makes up the novel, their affair mingles violence and tenderness, and it’s in this fraught romance that Wallace at last must stop hiding behind his scientific detachment. And Taylor’s prose, in turn, slips inevitably from detached observations into something altogether warmer.
Or What You Will by Jo Walton
Or What You Will is a frothy and playful fantasy novel from Jo Walton that is so much fun to read, it takes a while to realize how existential it is.
It’s narrated by a spirit who is living in the back of the mind of an aging author named Sylvia. The spirit is a character in some of Sylvia’s books, and also a representation of the creative part of her mind. But — crucially — the spirit is also just a spirit, with an ontologically separate existence from Sylvia’s.
Sylvia is reaching the end of her life now, and the spirit is worried that he will die with her. So he wants Sylvia to write them both into the world of a new book, one where they will never die.
My favorite part of Or What You Will is how skillfully it manipulated me. The novel’s final pages are, more or less, a reveal. But Walton had somehow incepted the information that she was gearing up to divulge into my mind over the course of the book, without ever doing anything so clumsy or gauche as to hint at it. When she finally confirmed what she had already somehow pushed me to know, the moment was so cathartic that it made me cry.
Uncanny Valley by Anna Wiener
Uncanny Valley is a memoir about the tech world, written for liberal arts skeptics. It’s not out to convince us we’re wrong, so much as it aims to convince us we’re not skeptical enough.
Wiener moves to Silicon Valley in 2010 as a bright-eyed young refugee from publishing, looking for a job that will suit her ambitions. Over the course of the decade, she works her way through a series of Bay Area startups, always on the “soft skills” side, where the engineers treat her with amiable condescension. She is excited by tech’s utopian rhetoric and eager to please. One young CEO remarks approvingly that she is “DFTC”: Down For The Cause. Another advises her she should learn JavaScript, and suggests she knock it out in a weekend.
But as Wiener entrenches herself deeper into Silicon Valley, she watches the industry’s ostensible ambitions curdle into something darker. Tech startups, she concludes, are skillful at talking about themselves as scrappy underdogs — but what they are really interested in is acquiring power, and they are pursuing that goal assiduously. And Wiener, whose “soft skills” include a razor-sharp prose style with a cutting eye for detail, shows us the all-too-human costs.