healingoracle--2020-07-08--WHEN DID WEARING SOMETHING THAT STOPS YOU BREATHING BECOME A GOOD IDEA?

Why wearing a mask is worse for you than not and why are we even being forced into this latest round of state orders that are claimed to be in the interest of everyone ’ s health , whilst having the opposite effect ?
Masks are dangerous .
The chances of health issues are far more serious with a mask covering both main airways ; your mouth , and your nose .
Its shocking that children are being forced to wear masks all day at school , even during exercise , this is a world gone mad .
The risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whilst their growing brains are being starved of oxygen .
How is this helping our nation ’ s health ?
For many of us the risk of heart failure due to low oxygen levels and stress on the heart and lungs are in themselves a real prospect .
If you have low blood pressure or suffer from asthma then wearing a mask all day , or even for an hour , is an awfully bad idea .
Let alone driving with one on .
The bodies reaction to low oxygen is of course @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the head low to the ground as soon as possible .
How is driving in a car with a mask on a good idea , ever ?
A few short months ago , we were being warned that wearing masks was dangerous and best avoided .
The WHO and CDC have both made the same point .
But suddenly here we are with people shouting and screaming about masks whilst they fill up on processed sugar and many states are making it a law to comply to the Oxygen suppressing infection gathering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deter against the plan-demic .
Here are two good posts that sum up the whole masked issues .
I saw the following reposted on a colleague ’ s professional page .
This person is a very well-respected and very informed physician .
I ’ ve maintained that personally , setting politics and scientific arguments aside , that if wearing a mask helps someone else feel safer and keeps the economy going , I will wear a mask in public .
My colleague does bring up some thoughts that likely do need to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I ’ d love to hear your thoughts and please let ’ s all be nice 🙏 👇👇👇 Here is the post from my colleague : Me : The viral particles are much smaller than the pores of the mask , so the mask is ineffective at filtering them .
Right ?
R : No , they travel on droplets and the masks keep the droplets out .
Or they keep them in if you ’ re sick .
M : So wait , how is the virus transmitted ?
R : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ M : Droplets ?
R : Yes , like droplets spewed through a cough or sneeze .
M : So through people who are showing symptoms ?
R : Yes M : So why do healthy people need to wear masks ?
R : Because of asymptomatic spread .
Listen to the experts .
M : I am listening to the experts .
Many studies show , and even the WHO announced , that asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly rare .
Did you read that ?
R : WHO walked that back to clarify @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerning .
M : Presymptomatic ?
R : Yes , like they are infected but showing no symptoms .
M : Symptoms like coughing or sneezing ?
R : Yes .
M : So how is the virus spread again ?
R : Just wear the mask .
M : Are you going to answer the question ?
R : It ’ s like pants .
M : Pants ?
R : If a person pees in public without pants on , you have a greater chance of getting pee on you .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ are wearing pants too .
M : First of all , people don ’ t pee in public .
Second , if they did pee in public , the only way someone ’ s stream of urine would hit me is if they were directly aiming for me and standing close enough to hit me .
And third , I don ’ t care if you wear pants .
How does this relate ?
R : If someone coughs on you in public you ’ ll care .
M : People don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The last time someone coughed directly in my face was when I had toddlers and they didn ’ t understand common courtesy and germ transmission .
The only way someone would cough directly on me in public is if they were aiming .
Anyway pants don ’ t keep the pee in , it ’ s still going to get everywhere .
Pants just change the direction of the flow .
Same with masks .
R : Common courtesy ?
!
You don ’ t have common courtesy if you ’ re refusing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a mask !
M : How is it courteous to ask me to do something I disagree with ( based on research ) especially when I ’ m not sick or showing any symptoms when the virus is spread through the droplets of people who are showing symptoms ?
R : You ’ ll think differently if you get sick .
M : If I get sick , I ’ ll stay home .
But if I must go out I will be happy to not cough on people .
But just to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in public if I were wearing a mask and coughing ?
R : No , I mean , if you get sick , you could die .
M : The virus has a 99.9 something percent survival rate .
R : It ’ s not about you , it ’ s about protecting the vulnerable .
M : If I am not sick or showing symptoms how am I further protecting the vulnerable by wearing a mask ?
Studies also show these masks put the wearer at increased risk of illness .
R @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those studies , you need to listen to professionals in the fields of medicine and science .
M : These studies ARE from professionals in the fields of medicine and science .
R : They are obviously flawed .
M : How so ?
R : It wouldn ’ t be a mandate if it weren ’ t important .
M : Why is it a mandate now that the death rate has plummeted when it wasn ’ t a mandate during the peak ?
R : Because of new studies on masks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been studied before , in the entire history of medicine ?
R : It ’ s a new virus .
M : A new virus that is transmitted in the same way as other viruses .
How is it transmitted again ?
Through droplets of people showing symptoms ?
So , if I ’ m not sick or showing symptoms and I have no fever and I ’ m not coughing , how would my wearing a mask further prevent transmission ?
R : Stop being an asshole and wear the mask .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ asking that I stop thinking critically , accept a fascist mandate , join the herd , and walk blindly into a dangerous abyss of ever increasing control over my self sovereignty , all while signaling my virtue ?
R : I ’ ll report you if you don ’ t .
M : What country am I in again ?
This is also a very good summary .
For all you mask wearers ( especially those of you who think wearing it outside is NOT stupid 🤦🏼♀ ) .
I know I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctor degree ” bubble , but here goes nothing .
So Masks ?
I am OSHA 10 & 30 certified .
I know some of you are too .
I don ’ t really know WHY OSHA hasn ’ t come forward and stopped the nonsense BUT I want to cover 3 things • N95 masks and masks with exhale ports • surgical masks • filter or cloth masks Okay , so upon further inspection , OSHA says some masks are okay and not okay in certain situations .
If you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you give your employees the wrong masks and they get sick , you can be sued .
• N95 masks : are designed for CONTAMINATED environments .
That means when you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into contamination .
The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breathe straight out without filtration .
They don ’ t filter the air on the way out .
They don ’ t need to .
Conclusion : if you ’ re in Target and the guy with COVID has an N95 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being exhaled into Target ( because it was designed for already contaminated environments , it ’ s not filtering your air on the way out ) .
• Surgical Mask : these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments .
The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are CLOGGING these masks very , VERY quickly .
The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask will render it “ useless ” IF you come in contact with COVID and your mask traps it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Every time you put your mask on you are breathing the germs from EVERYWHERE you went .
They should be changed or thrown out every “ 20-30 minutes in a non-sterile environment.
” • Cloth masks : I can ’ t even believe I ’ m having to explain this , but here it goes .
Today , three people pointed to their masks as they walked by me entering Lowe ’ s .
They said “ ya got ta wear your mask BRO , ” I said very clearly “ those masks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact , they MAKE you sicker ” they “ pushed ” me .
By now hopefully , you all know CLOTH masks do not filter anything .
You mean the American flag one my aunt made ?
Yes .
The one with sunflowers that looks so cute ?
Yes .
The bandanna , the cut-up t-shirt , the scarf ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever .
As you exhale , you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide .
Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best .
It actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden overnight .
Dry coughing , enhanced allergies , sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask .
*N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person .
*The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it .
Its filtration works on the exhale , ( Like a vacuum bag , it only works one way ) but likely stops after 20 minutes , rendering it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ correct Becky , they don ’ t work in a bar , not even a little bit ) .
*Cloth masks are WORSE than none .
It ’ s equivalent to using a chain-link fence to stop mosquitos .
The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks .
The masks don ’ t work .
They ’ re being used to provide false comfort and push forward a specific agenda .
For the love of God , research each mask ’ s designed use and purpose , I bet you will find NONE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viral defense.
” Just like EVERY Flu season kids , wash your hands .
Sanitize your hands .
Don ’ t touch stuff .
Sanitize your phone .
Don ’ t touch people .
And keep your distance .
Why ?
Because your breath stinks , your deodorant is failing , your shoes are old and stink , that shirts not clean , & I like my space .
Trust me I can hear you from here .
Lots of reasons to keep your distance and work on body hygiene .
But trust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
*Occupational Safety & Hazard Association sited .
The top American organization for safety .
They regulate and educate asbestos workers , surgical rooms , you name it .
I know , facts suck .
They throw a wrench into the perfectly ( seeming ) packaged pill you are willingly swallowing .
Facts make you have to form your OWN OPINION , instead of regurgitating someone else ’ s , and I know how uncomfortable that makes a lot of you .
If your mask gives you security , by all means , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a false sense of security and you shouldn ’ t shame anyone into partaking in such “ conspiracies.
” If select politicians stopped enforcing it , no one would continue this nonsense .
Don ’ t drink the kool-aid .
We do the research you do decide , Love and Light The Healing Oracle Team Please join our Facebook group Also join our growing numbers on MeWe : Healing Oracle Also join us on YouTube Global Petition Please Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a chance of saving the children of the future .
Keep Us Advertising Free Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers .
If you find the posts and resources useful , please consider making a contribution to support us ( in any amount ) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world .
We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health , or that of a loved one , with alternative treatment is an important mission .
Thank you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to continue .
Donate .
Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts , please use the ‘ donations ’ box above on the top right hand side ( on Desktop ) , or the donations box below ( on Mobile ) Please join our Facebook group The Healing Oracle for more open and unrestricted views and discussions on health.Also join our growing numbers onAlso join us on Twitter Please sign our global petition against enforced vaccinations The intention of this petition is to present 5 million signatures to each @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and heads of state worldwide.Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.If we stand as one , we have a chance of saving the children of the future.Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers .
If you find the posts and resources useful , please consider making a contribution to support us ( in any amount ) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world .
We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with alternative treatment is an important mission .
Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.Donate .
Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts , please use the ‘ donations ’ box above on the top right hand side , or the donations box below

Why wearing a mask is worse for you than not and why are we even being forced into this latest round of state orders that are claimed to be in the interest of everyone’s health, whilst having the opposite effect?
Masks are dangerous. The chances of health issues are far more serious with a mask covering both main airways; your mouth, and your nose.
Its shocking that children are being forced to wear masks all day at school, even during exercise, this is a world gone mad. The risk of lung collapse is far higher, whilst their growing brains are being starved of oxygen. How is this helping our nation’s health?
For many of us the risk of heart failure due to low oxygen levels and stress on the heart and lungs are in themselves a real prospect. If you have low blood pressure or suffer from asthma then wearing a mask all day, or even for an hour, is an awfully bad idea.
Let alone driving with one on. The bodies reaction to low oxygen is of course to pass out. Get the heart and the head low to the ground as soon as possible. How is driving in a car with a mask on a good idea, ever?
A few short months ago, we were being warned that wearing masks was dangerous and best avoided. The WHO and CDC have both made the same point. But suddenly here we are with people shouting and screaming about masks whilst they fill up on processed sugar and many states are making it a law to comply to the Oxygen suppressing infection gathering pieces of cloth that do little to deter against the plan-demic.
Here are two good posts that sum up the whole masked issues.
This post from Dr Jason Bradley
Is There A Mask Debate?
I saw the following reposted on a colleague’s professional page.
This person is a very well-respected and very informed physician.
I’ve maintained that personally, setting politics and scientific arguments aside, that if wearing a mask helps someone else feel safer and keeps the economy going, I will wear a mask in public.
My colleague does bring up some thoughts that likely do need to be addressed for us all to come together.
I’d love to hear your thoughts and please let’s all be nice 🙏
👇👇👇
Here is the post from my colleague:
Random person: “Wear your damn mask”
Me: The viral particles are much smaller than the pores of the mask, so the mask is ineffective at filtering them. Right?
R: No, they travel on droplets and the masks keep the droplets out. Or they keep them in if you’re sick.
M: So wait, how is the virus transmitted?
R: Through droplets. Wear the mask.
M: Droplets?
R: Yes, like droplets spewed through a cough or sneeze.
M: So through people who are showing symptoms?
R: Yes
M: So why do healthy people need to wear masks?
R: Because of asymptomatic spread. Listen to the experts.
M: I am listening to the experts. Many studies show, and even the WHO announced, that asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly rare. Did you read that?
R: WHO walked that back to clarify that its presymptomatic spread that’s concerning.
M: Presymptomatic?
R: Yes, like they are infected but showing no symptoms.
M: Symptoms like coughing or sneezing?
R: Yes.
M: So how is the virus spread again?
R: Just wear the mask.
M: Are you going to answer the question?
R: It’s like pants.
M: Pants?
R: If a person pees in public without pants on, you have a greater chance of getting pee on you. Your risk is reduced further if you are wearing pants too.
M: First of all, people don’t pee in public. Second, if they did pee in public, the only way someone’s stream of urine would hit me is if they were directly aiming for me and standing close enough to hit me. And third, I don’t care if you wear pants. How does this relate?
R: If someone coughs on you in public you’ll care.
M: People don’t just cough on each other. The last time someone coughed directly in my face was when I had toddlers and they didn’t understand common courtesy and germ transmission. The only way someone would cough directly on me in public is if they were aiming. Anyway pants don’t keep the pee in, it’s still going to get everywhere. Pants just change the direction of the flow. Same with masks.
R: Common courtesy?! You don’t have common courtesy if you’re refusing to do something as simple as wearing a mask!
M: How is it courteous to ask me to do something I disagree with (based on research) especially when I’m not sick or showing any symptoms when the virus is spread through the droplets of people who are showing symptoms?
R: You’ll think differently if you get sick.
M: If I get sick, I’ll stay home. But if I must go out I will be happy to not cough on people. But just to clarify, would you stand near me in public if I were wearing a mask and coughing?
R: No, I mean, if you get sick, you could die.
M: The virus has a 99.9 something percent survival rate.
R: It’s not about you, it’s about protecting the vulnerable.
M: If I am not sick or showing symptoms how am I further protecting the vulnerable by wearing a mask? Studies also show these masks put the wearer at increased risk of illness.
R: You can’t listen to those studies, you need to listen to professionals in the fields of medicine and science.
M: These studies ARE from professionals in the fields of medicine and science.
R: They are obviously flawed.
M: How so?
R: It wouldn’t be a mandate if it weren’t important.
M: Why is it a mandate now that the death rate has plummeted when it wasn’t a mandate during the peak?
R: Because of new studies on masks.
M: So masks have never been studied before, in the entire history of medicine?
R: It’s a new virus.
M: A new virus that is transmitted in the same way as other viruses. How is it transmitted again? Through droplets of people showing symptoms? So, if I’m not sick or showing symptoms and I have no fever and I’m not coughing, how would my wearing a mask further prevent transmission?
R: Stop being an asshole and wear the mask.
M: So, you’re asking that I stop thinking critically, accept a fascist mandate, join the herd, and walk blindly into a dangerous abyss of ever increasing control over my self sovereignty, all while signaling my virtue?
R: I’ll report you if you don’t.
M: What country am I in again?
Thoughts?
This is also a very good summary.
Cassandra Michelle Smith
For all you mask wearers (especially those of you who think wearing it outside is NOT stupid 🤦🏼♀). I know I’m about to burst your “google doctor degree” bubble, but here goes nothing.
So Masks?
I am OSHA 10&30 certified. I know some of you are too. I don’t really know WHY OSHA hasn’t come forward and stopped the nonsense BUT I want to cover 3 things
• N95 masks and masks with exhale ports
• surgical masks
• filter or cloth masks
Okay, so upon further inspection, OSHA says some masks are okay and not okay in certain situations.
If you’re working with fumes and aerosol chemicals and you give your employees the wrong masks and they get sick, you can be sued.
N95 masks: are designed for CONTAMINATED environments. That means when you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into contamination. The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breathe straight out without filtration. They don’t filter the air on the way out. They don’t need to.
Conclusion: if you’re in Target and the guy with COVID has an N95 mask, his COVID breath is unfiltered being exhaled into Target (because it was designed for already contaminated environments, it’s not filtering your air on the way out).
Conclusion: if you’re in Target and the guy with COVID has an N95 mask, his COVID breath is unfiltered being exhaled into Target (because it was designed for already contaminated environments, it’s not filtering your air on the way out). Surgical Mask: these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments. The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are CLOGGING these masks very, VERY quickly. The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask will render it “useless” IF you come in contact with COVID and your mask traps it, YOU become a walking virus dispenser. Every time you put your mask on you are breathing the germs from EVERYWHERE you went. They should be changed or thrown out every “20-30 minutes in a non-sterile environment.”
Cloth masks: I can’t even believe I’m having to explain this, but here it goes. Today, three people pointed to their masks as they walked by me entering Lowe’s. They said “ya gotta wear your mask BRO,” I said very clearly “those masks don’t work bro, in fact, they MAKE you sicker” they “pushed” me. By now hopefully, you all know CLOTH masks do not filter anything. You mean the American flag one my aunt made? Yes. The one with sunflowers that looks so cute? Yes. The bandanna, the cut-up t-shirt, the scarf ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever. As you exhale, you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide. Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best. It actually risks your health, rather than protect it. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden overnight. Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask.
-Ultimate Answer:
*N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person.
*The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it. Its filtration works on the exhale, (Like a vacuum bag, it only works one way) but likely stops after 20 minutes, rendering it useless outside of a STERILE ENVIRONMENT (correct Becky, they don’t work in a bar, not even a little bit).
*Cloth masks are WORSE than none. It’s equivalent to using a chain-link fence to stop mosquitos.
The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks. The masks don’t work. They’re being used to provide false comfort and push forward a specific agenda. For the love of God, research each mask’s designed use and purpose, I bet you will find NONE are used in the way of “viral defense.”
Just like EVERY Flu season kids, wash your hands. Sanitize your hands. Don’t touch stuff. Sanitize your phone. Don’t touch people. And keep your distance. Why? Because your breath stinks, your deodorant is failing, your shoes are old and stink, that shirts not clean, & I like my space. Trust me I can hear you from here. Lots of reasons to keep your distance and work on body hygiene. But trust me, the masks do not work.
*Occupational Safety & Hazard Association sited.
The top American organization for safety.
They regulate and educate asbestos workers, surgical rooms, you name it.
I know, facts suck. They throw a wrench into the perfectly (seeming) packaged pill you are willingly swallowing. Facts make you have to form your OWN OPINION, instead of regurgitating someone else’s, and I know how uncomfortable that makes a lot of you. If your mask gives you security, by all means, wear it. Just know it is a false sense of security and you shouldn’t shame anyone into partaking in such “conspiracies.”
If select politicians stopped enforcing it, no one would continue this nonsense. Don’t drink the kool-aid.
We do the research you decide,
Love and Light
The Healing Oracle Team
Please join our growing numbers on MeWe: Healing Oracle
Also join us on YouTube
Global Petition
Please
Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.
If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.
Keep Us Advertising Free
Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.
Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side (on Desktop), or the donations box below (on Mobile)
Please join our growing numbers onAlso join us on Twitter Please sign our global petition against enforced vaccinations The intention of this petition is to present 5 million signatures to each President, Prime Minister, Health Minister and heads of state worldwide.Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side, or the donations box below
[social_warfare]


healingoracle--2020-07-08--THE FLU VACCINATION AS LITMUS TEST FOR VALIDITY AND ETHICS OF MEDICAL POLICIES

Please read Dr James L Chestnut ’ s interesting analysis of the Flu vaccine and how it reflects on the ethics of the medical industry .
Written before the Corona virus outbreak last summer it sets the question as to why have health officials repeatedly pushed the Flu vaccine as the ONLY treatment for an all be it quite different virus ?
None of the “ medical experts ” on public display ever talk about the immune system and how this very well-designed system will help us fight off pathogens and toxins .
No one talks about the need for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and exercise .
As soon as the coronavirus was introduced by the media , it seemed that the only advise was to go and get the flu shot .
Any natural cures were derided and quickly quashed as quackery , whilst others were never given the light of day .
But why , we wondered was it that a vaccine for a different “ virus ” was being pushed as a remedy and then alarmingly it was also discovered that the flu shot also contained coronavirus as an ingredient and so the flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A virus that would take thousands of dollars to really test for and to isolate enough to treat .
So are the coronavirus and the flu shot intrinsically linked ?
For it is the same medical and media industry that are now suddenly invested in masks .
Making them mandatory .
As now suddenly you can be fined and arrested for not wearing a mask in certain areas ?
It ’ s all behavioural links and social conditioning for the future as more blind compliance leads to more blind compliance and never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ following article is written by Dr. James L. Chestnut B.Ed.
, M.Sc.
, D.C. , C.C.W.P .
To me the flu shot is the most valid litmus test of the validity and ethics of vaccine policy .
We can EASILY determine whether the flu shot recommendations are based on valid science or industry created dogma .
We can also judge the ability of politicians , nurses , doctors , and the general public to evaluate the validity and ethics of such policy .
We can look at the fervor with which so many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ citizens support flu vaccination campaigns and evaluate if this fervor is based upon scientific research or dogmatic belief in , and adherence to , top down policy – and who creates the policy and whether or not these policy makers have conflicts of interest .
We have actual data to determine if those healthcare providers who so fervently advocate for flu shots for virtually every citizen are critically thinking , evidence-based clinicians or dogmatic , unquestioning followers or policy .
What we can ’ t argue is the fact that the current flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and implemented in clinical practice .
This gives us an enormous opportunity to evaluate the practice of healthcare in general .
We can ask the most important question there is .
Are the recommendations we receive from medical doctors based on valid data or on blind faith to policy , and who creates the policy ?
Where is the information that doctor ’ s use to form their beliefs coming from – who is educating our doctors ?
Are we being offered evidence-based , safe , effective care or dogma-based , marketing-based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we find that there is insufficient and misleading data about the effectiveness of the flu shot and that the flu shot vaccination policy is fraudulent then we simply must admit that other healthcare policies could suffer from the same issues .
It ’ s all about whether we can admit the possibility .
The flu shot is the litmus test , it is the canary in the coal mine .
The evidence regarding flu vaccination policy is easy to study because the flu vaccine is only given once a year , it changes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ willing to research it and publish this research in peer-reviewed medical journals without fear of having their careers and reputations ruined .
That ’ s why I decided to look at the flu shot .
The people questioning the validity of data supporting flu vaccinations are not conspiracy theorists or quacks ; they include PhD and MD researchers from the National Institute of Health , from the Cochrane Collaboration , from the Department of Global Health , and from Gold Standard Universities and Research Centers .
There is enough data and basic science @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific logic of the flu vaccination policy .
To begin with , Flu is much more an issue of innate immunity than humoral or antibody immunity .
Cold and flu viruses are always changing so antibodies are not the defense strategy our immune system uses to fight the flu .
The best defense against the cold and flu is the cellular or innate immune system which is primed and ready to attack and kill such viruses .
Innate immunity is not what vaccines target , vaccines target humoral or antibody immunity .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of fluctuations in vit D levels due to fluctuations in sun exposure .
As we get less sun exposure , we make less vitamin D , which is integral to the function of our innate immune system , and flu incidence increases .
The flu season is in the summer months in the tropics because it is the rainy or cloudy season which decreases sun exposure and vitamin D levels .
The flu season in in the winter in the areas away from the equator due to less sunlight exposure .
Vaccines will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why they have never been shown to protect against the flu or prevent death from the flu .
A scientific critique of the flu vaccine literature reveals that they report relative instead of absolute benefit , that there is huge frailty bias because the sickest people are least likely to get vaccinated and most likely to die , and this makes it appear that flu vaccination prevents death .
However , the evidence is overwhelming that it does not .
In fact , the data on death prevention is so spurious that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shot reduces all cause mortality by 50 % because they simply can not prove that the flu shot prevents death from the flu .
They actually unabashedly claim that the flu shot prevents deaths from heart disease , cancer , stroke , car accidents and lightning strikes – during the winter months .
When flu shot advocates are forced to admit there is no evidence of flu prevention they claim that the flu vaccine is still important because it saves lives .
They hugely exaggerate the estimates of yearly death rates caused by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths CAUSED by the flu when in fact the data shows that there is less than 1000 confirmed deaths from the flu , and these are virtually all in patients who are very ill with another illness before they get the flu .
A review of the literature reveals that the entire flu vaccination program was started without data to support it and it has steadily grown to include recommendations from a panel of 15 people , many with financial conflicts of interest , to vaccinate every citizen of the U.S. over 6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about 300,000,000 doses of vaccine based on no valid clinical data of benefit for prevention of the flu or reducing death rates from the flu .
If this sounds incredulous it is because it is .
This is not opinion , this is peer-reviewed , published fact .
The real question being begged is , how did they get intelligent nurses and medical doctors to believe that there is evidence for the flu shot and to fervently implement the flu vaccination policy ?
Do doctors and nurses have the scientific methodological education and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the courage , or even the cultural inclination , to question policy and guidelines or are they taught , encouraged , and even coerced under threat of sanction , to blindly follow policy ?
Are doctors in a position to act in the best interest of patients or have they been put in a position to do what they are told and to blindly follow policies put in place by the very people who financially benefit from these policies ?
Is all this even possible in today ’ s society or does it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Well I did the work to find out .
The data is unequivocal .
We have a flu vaccination program based on deliberate misrepresentation of data that creates billions in profit for the people who manufacture the vaccines and that provides no proven benefit to the people receiving it .
Below are some data and facts from the peer-reviewed literature such as the 2010 and 2012 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews ( Jefferson , T. et al .
( 2010 ) Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in the elderly .
Cochrane Database of Systematic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; Jefferson , T. et al .
( 2012 ) Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Children .
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews .
8 : Article # CDOO4879 ; Jefferson , T. et al .
( 2010 ) Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderly .
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews .
2 : Article # CDOO5187 ) an article published in the British Medical Journal in 2006 ( Jefferson , T. et al .
( 2006 ) Influenza vaccination : policy vs evidence .
BMJ 2006 ; 333:912-915 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
systematic review published in the Lancet ( Osterholm , M. et al .
( 2012 ) Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines : a systematic review and meta-analysis .
Lancet Infect Dis 12 : 36-44 ) : • The flu vaccination has no effect on hospital admissions or flu complication rates • Less than 1 % of those who get vaccinated can expect to avoid flu symptoms ( this is not greater than those who do not get vaccinated • There is no evidence that flu vaccination reduces transmission of the flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccination prevents pneumonia or death from pneumonia • Studies showed that vaccinating healthcare workers who look after the elderly had no effect on the incidence of flu , pneumonia , or deaths from pneumonia • The large gap between policy and what the data tell us is surprising • There is widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of studies • Proper randomized placebo-controlled studies CAN and MUST be done FACT : Since 1980 vaccination coverage has increased from 15 % to 80 % with no decline in incidence or mortality , no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the incidence rates of both mortality and hospital admissions have increased with increasing vaccine coverage since 1980 FACT : Estimates of death from flu are vastly exaggerated ; they lump flu in with pneumonia but it is pneumonia that is causing the deaths NOT the flu FACT : Flu vaccines do NOT prevent pneumonia – or the flu FACT : Estimates of benefit from vaccines are vastly exaggerated – they claim a 50 % reduction in all cause mortality – this is absurd beyond belief .
The same vaccinated people ( the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less in the summer when there is no flu !
It is frailty bias that is causing the increased deaths of the non-vaccinated not the vaccine that is causing decreased deaths in the vaccinated .
This is indisputable based on the data .
FACT : Frailty bias and reporting of relative vs absolute differences account for the claimed benefits not actual effectiveness .
FACT : Claims of reduction in incidence of flu are bogus and based on relative vs absolute difference .
3 % vs 2 % and they call this a 50 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ difference represents 50 % of the 2 % death rate in the vaccination group .
I AM NOT JOKING .
FACT : No trial data supports reduction in mortality from flu vaccination – NO DATA FACT : It all started in 1957-58 with a pandemic flu season .
They used this to recommend annual vaccination for everyone over 65 even though they admitted , in peer-review , that they had NO DATA , not a shred of evidence of effectiveness of the flu vaccine , upon which to make the recommendation .
FACT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Immunization Practices reaffirmed this recommendation even as they noted that there was an absence of efficacy data !
!
They affirmed with no supporting evidence , the earlier policy that had no supporting evidence .
FACT : Because of this recommendation the elderly and high-risk groups – the very people the flu vaccination campaign is based on , have been excluded from placebo-controlled trials because it was deemed against policy to deny anyone the vaccine .
So , no studies done to determine if there was any evidence for the policy because of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The ACIP supports the widely held view that inclusion of the elderly and high-risk patients in research trials would be unethical .
FACT : A 2000 Committee on Gov ’ t Reform in the U.S. House of representatives found that the chair of the FDA and the CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee owned stock in drug companies that make vaccines .
Individuals on both committees own patents for vaccines under consideration or affected by the decisions of the committees .
FACT : In 2010 the ACIP established the first recommendation for universal flu vaccination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of age .
This policy has been supported and implemented with dogmatic vigor by nurses and medical doctors .
There is NO VALID DATA of effectiveness or benefit to support this policy .
Again , I reiterate , the flu vaccine policy is the litmus test .
IF the above is true , if the research scientists who publish this are not quacks , if the Cochrane Review scientists are not quacks , if the conflicts of interest of the policy makers are true , if the blind implementation of the policy has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at least accept the possibility that other vaccine policies could have similar issues .
No conspiracy theories , no dogma , no emotional debates .
Let ’ s just look at the data .
You don ’ t need to be an immunologist or a medical doctor or a scientist , you just need to look at the available data .
What does the actual data say ?
No evidence , no controlled trials , no proven benefit , hugely exaggerated risks and benefits , flu vaccine patent holders or vaccine manufacturer company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flu shot guidelines , ever increasing number of people recommended for flu shots since 1980 , ever increasing numbers of people receiving flu shot since 1980 ( from 15 % -65 % coverage ) , and , in the midst of all this , increasing rates of flu infection rate and death rates associate with flu .
How can this happen ?
Well if you claim your product reduces death by 50 % and you get people to believe it you are going to get policy makers willing to mandate it and clinicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
Most importantly , once you can get the benefits believed as gospel you can prevent studies that compare vaccination to non-vaccination because it becomes immoral to withhold an intervention that has been “ proven ” to reduce death by 50 % .
I should say it becomes perceived as immoral to withhold an intervention that has been falsely assumed to be proven to reduce death by 50 % .
If this is true , what does that tell us about other vaccines ?
Do we have similar beliefs and assumptions about other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
If this can be true , is it remotely possible that other vaccine campaigns could have similar issues ?
The answer is , without any reasonable doubt , yes ; at the very least it is a possibility .
That ’ s all I advocate for , the admission that it is a possibility based on the fact that we have other provable examples of unethical and dishonest reporting of evidence regarding vaccine effectiveness .
As long as someone can convince you that it is not a possibility that the pharmaceutical companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of fraudulent claims of benefit and deliberately hiding known risks of their products , including deaths ( think opioids and Thalidomide and Vioxx for just a very few examples ) , or the politicians these convicted felons spend billions of dollars on to lobby , or the medical doctors they spend billions on to lobby , educate , and bribe , could never commit such acts , even though they have been proven to do so many times in the past , then the valid research will just never get demanded ordone .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing the research ?
Well , if you are a flu vaccine advocate you say the randomized placebo-controlled trials – the only kind of trial that can establish benefit from the vaccine- can not ethically be conducted because it is unethical to deny any citizen the enormous benefit of a 50 % reduction in death ( which of course is PROVEN FALSE ) .
It is clever , I will admit that .
The simplest , and to me most logical , ethical , and most revealing questions to ask regarding current mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death rates in Western countries from the childhood illnesses like measles , mumps , and pertussis in the years and decades prior to the implementation of the mass vaccination campaign compared to the death rates after implementation of this campaign ?
If death rates from these childhood illnesses were steadily declining exponentially prior to mass vaccination how can this be explained – what caused the exponential decline in death rates from these illnesses prior to mass vaccination ?
Was what caused the decline prior to mass vaccination magically removed as a contributing variable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ atopic disorder rates prior to and after mass vaccination ?
What were the other childhood illness rates prior to and after mass vaccination ?
Why are there different vaccination schedules in different countries and do the countries with fewer vaccinations have more illness and more deaths from illness ?
If not , how can the policies with more required vaccinations be justified ?
What is the actual morbidity and mortality risks from these childhood diseases in populations that are well nourished and have access to proper medical care ?
How many cases of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the past 50 years have resulted in serious morbidity or mortality ?
Are there cases of these illnesses reported in fully vaccinated children ?
If so , how can this be explained ?
Are the death rate statistics quoted for these childhood illnesses from representative populations or are they deliberately taken from poor countries with malnourished children ?
Are the death rate statistics deliberately taken from eras during higher death rates that deliberately leave out the eras with very low death rates – for example the decades immediately prior to the implementation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not genetic , an illness that has incidence rates that have risen exponentially over a short period of time can not possibly be genetic .
Thus , we know autism has an environmental cause and is thus preventable .
There is an environmental variable or variables that have caused the rapid increase in autism rates .
Autism is a debilitating illness , both to the child and to the family .
Autism rates are so high and the cost of care so emotionally , financially , and time/effort expensive that the illness is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just families but the education system and our culture .
Autism now represents the single greatest health threat to children in North America ; it is more prevalent and more devastating to the childhood and parental populations than any other childhood illness .
Despite the prevalence and the seriousness , there has been no major government , scientific , or medical commissions to study all possible causes .
This has never been the case with any other serious and prevalent childhood epidemic .
Polio was without a doubt a very serious threat , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Childhood cancers , though rare , are a devastating threat .
Look how we have responded to childhood cancers .
Why are we not responding to the threat of autism in the same way with the same resources ?
Are rates of autism different in different countries ?
If so , how is this explained ?
If the vaccines are effective , then why would a non-vaccinated individual pose a threat to a vaccinated individual ?
The only way to validly determine the effectiveness of any vaccine ( or any intervention for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proper randomized controlled placebo trial where one group is given the vaccine and the other is given a placebo vaccine and then both groups get controlled exposure to the pathogen .
This has NEVER been done , not even with the flu shot , and not even , to my knowledge , in animal studies !
!

Please read Dr James L Chestnut’s interesting analysis of the Flu vaccine and how it reflects on the ethics of the medical industry. Written before the Corona virus outbreak last summer it sets the question as to why have health officials repeatedly pushed the Flu vaccine as the ONLY treatment for an all be it quite different virus?
None of the “medical experts” on public display ever talk about the immune system and how this very well-designed system will help us fight off pathogens and toxins. No one talks about the need for Vitamin D, or a healthy diet and exercise.
As soon as the coronavirus was introduced by the media, it seemed that the only advise was to go and get the flu shot. Any natural cures were derided and quickly quashed as quackery, whilst others were never given the light of day.
But why, we wondered was it that a vaccine for a different “virus” was being pushed as a remedy and then alarmingly it was also discovered that the flu shot also contained coronavirus as an ingredient and so the flu shot became a clear transmitter of Covid-19.
A virus that would take thousands of dollars to really test for and to isolate enough to treat.
So are the coronavirus and the flu shot intrinsically linked?
For it is the same medical and media industry that are now suddenly invested in masks. Making them mandatory. As now suddenly you can be fined and arrested for not wearing a mask in certain areas? It’s all behavioural links and social conditioning for the future as more blind compliance leads to more blind compliance and never questioning what you are told.
The following article is written by Dr. James L. Chestnut B.Ed., M.Sc., D.C., C.C.W.P.
To me the flu shot is the most valid litmus test of the validity and ethics of vaccine policy. We can EASILY determine whether the flu shot recommendations are based on valid science or industry created dogma. We can also judge the ability of politicians, nurses, doctors, and the general public to evaluate the validity and ethics of such policy.
We can look at the fervor with which so many politicians, nurses, doctors, and citizens support flu vaccination campaigns and evaluate if this fervor is based upon scientific research or dogmatic belief in, and adherence to, top down policy – and who creates the policy and whether or not these policy makers have conflicts of interest. We have actual data to determine if those healthcare providers who so fervently advocate for flu shots for virtually every citizen are critically thinking, evidence-based clinicians or dogmatic, unquestioning followers or policy.
What we can’t argue is the fact that the current flu vaccine campaigns are highly supported, defended, and implemented in clinical practice. This gives us an enormous opportunity to evaluate the practice of healthcare in general. We can ask the most important question there is. Are the recommendations we receive from medical doctors based on valid data or on blind faith to policy, and who creates the policy? Where is the information that doctor’s use to form their beliefs coming from – who is educating our doctors? Are we being offered evidence-based, safe, effective care or dogma-based, marketing-based, profit-based, risky care?
If we find that there is insufficient and misleading data about the effectiveness of the flu shot and that the flu shot vaccination policy is fraudulent then we simply must admit that other healthcare policies could suffer from the same issues. It’s all about whether we can admit the possibility. The flu shot is the litmus test, it is the canary in the coal mine. The evidence regarding flu vaccination policy is easy to study because the flu vaccine is only given once a year, it changes every year, and we have people willing to research it and publish this research in peer-reviewed medical journals without fear of having their careers and reputations ruined. That’s why I decided to look at the flu shot.
The people questioning the validity of data supporting flu vaccinations are not conspiracy theorists or quacks; they include PhD and MD researchers from the National Institute of Health, from the Cochrane Collaboration, from the Department of Global Health, and from Gold Standard Universities and Research Centers.
There is enough data and basic science to scientifically evaluate the effectiveness and even scientific logic of the flu vaccination policy. To begin with, Flu is much more an issue of innate immunity than humoral or antibody immunity. Cold and flu viruses are always changing so antibodies are not the defense strategy our immune system uses to fight the flu. The best defense against the cold and flu is the cellular or innate immune system which is primed and ready to attack and kill such viruses. Innate immunity is not what vaccines target, vaccines target humoral or antibody immunity. The flu is seasonal – why? Because of fluctuations in vit D levels due to fluctuations in sun exposure. As we get less sun exposure, we make less vitamin D, which is integral to the function of our innate immune system, and flu incidence increases. The flu season is in the summer months in the tropics because it is the rainy or cloudy season which decreases sun exposure and vitamin D levels. The flu season in in the winter in the areas away from the equator due to less sunlight exposure. Vaccines will never improve innate immunity and this is why they have never been shown to protect against the flu or prevent death from the flu.
A scientific critique of the flu vaccine literature reveals that they report relative instead of absolute benefit, that there is huge frailty bias because the sickest people are least likely to get vaccinated and most likely to die, and this makes it appear that flu vaccination prevents death. However, the evidence is overwhelming that it does not. In fact, the data on death prevention is so spurious that they are forced to claim that the flu shot reduces all cause mortality by 50% because they simply cannot prove that the flu shot prevents death from the flu. They actually unabashedly claim that the flu shot prevents deaths from heart disease, cancer, stroke, car accidents and lightning strikes – during the winter months.
When flu shot advocates are forced to admit there is no evidence of flu prevention they claim that the flu vaccine is still important because it saves lives. They hugely exaggerate the estimates of yearly death rates caused by the flu. They claim over 30,000 deaths CAUSED by the flu when in fact the data shows that there is less than 1000 confirmed deaths from the flu, and these are virtually all in patients who are very ill with another illness before they get the flu.
A review of the literature reveals that the entire flu vaccination program was started without data to support it and it has steadily grown to include recommendations from a panel of 15 people, many with financial conflicts of interest, to vaccinate every citizen of the U.S. over 6 months of age – that’s about 300,000,000 doses of vaccine based on no valid clinical data of benefit for prevention of the flu or reducing death rates from the flu.
If this sounds incredulous it is because it is. This is not opinion, this is peer-reviewed, published fact.
The real question being begged is, how did they get intelligent nurses and medical doctors to believe that there is evidence for the flu shot and to fervently implement the flu vaccination policy? Do doctors and nurses have the scientific methodological education and ability, or the time, or the courage, or even the cultural inclination, to question policy and guidelines or are they taught, encouraged, and even coerced under threat of sanction, to blindly follow policy? Are doctors in a position to act in the best interest of patients or have they been put in a position to do what they are told and to blindly follow policies put in place by the very people who financially benefit from these policies?
Is all this even possible in today’s society or does it have to be ridiculous conspiracy theory? Well I did the work to find out.
The data is unequivocal. We have a flu vaccination program based on deliberate misrepresentation of data that creates billions in profit for the people who manufacture the vaccines and that provides no proven benefit to the people receiving it.
Below are some data and facts from the peer-reviewed literature such as the 2010 and 2012 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Jefferson, T. et al. (2010) Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in the elderly. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 8: Article #CDOO4879; Jefferson, T. et al. (2012) Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 8: Article #CDOO4879; Jefferson, T. et al. (2010) Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderly. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2: Article #CDOO5187) an article published in the British Medical Journal in 2006 (Jefferson, T. et al. (2006) Influenza vaccination: policy vs evidence. BMJ 2006; 333:912-915) and from the Osterholm et al. systematic review published in the Lancet (Osterholm, M. et al. (2012) Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 12: 36-44):
The flu vaccination has no effect on hospital admissions or flu complication rates
Less than 1% of those who get vaccinated can expect to avoid flu symptoms (this is not greater than those who do not get vaccinated
There is no evidence that flu vaccination reduces transmission of the flu
There is no evidence that flu vaccination prevents pneumonia or death from pneumonia
Studies showed that vaccinating healthcare workers who look after the elderly had no effect on the incidence of flu, pneumonia, or deaths from pneumonia
The large gap between policy and what the data tell us is surprising
There is widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of studies
Proper randomized placebo-controlled studies CAN and MUST be done
FACT: Since 1980 vaccination coverage has increased from 15% to 80% with no decline in incidence or mortality, no decrease in hospital admissions. In fact, the incidence rates of both mortality and hospital admissions have increased with increasing vaccine coverage since 1980
FACT: Estimates of death from flu are vastly exaggerated; they lump flu in with pneumonia but it is pneumonia that is causing the deaths NOT the flu
FACT: Flu vaccines do NOT prevent pneumonia – or the flu
FACT: Estimates of benefit from vaccines are vastly exaggerated – they claim a 50% reduction in all cause mortality – this is absurd beyond belief. The same vaccinated people (the healthier ones who get vaccinated) die less in the summer when there is no flu! It is frailty bias that is causing the increased deaths of the non-vaccinated not the vaccine that is causing decreased deaths in the vaccinated. This is indisputable based on the data.
FACT: Frailty bias and reporting of relative vs absolute differences account for the claimed benefits not actual effectiveness.
FACT: Claims of reduction in incidence of flu are bogus and based on relative vs absolute difference. 3% vs 2% and they call this a 50% reduction because the 1% absolute difference represents 50% of the 2% death rate in the vaccination group. I AM NOT JOKING.
FACT: No trial data supports reduction in mortality from flu vaccination – NO DATA
FACT: It all started in 1957-58 with a pandemic flu season. They used this to recommend annual vaccination for everyone over 65 even though they admitted, in peer-review, that they had NO DATA, not a shred of evidence of effectiveness of the flu vaccine, upon which to make the recommendation.
FACT: In 1964 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices reaffirmed this recommendation even as they noted that there was an absence of efficacy data!! They affirmed with no supporting evidence, the earlier policy that had no supporting evidence.
FACT: Because of this recommendation the elderly and high-risk groups – the very people the flu vaccination campaign is based on, have been excluded from placebo-controlled trials because it was deemed against policy to deny anyone the vaccine. So, no studies done to determine if there was any evidence for the policy because of the policy based on no evidence. The ACIP supports the widely held view that inclusion of the elderly and high-risk patients in research trials would be unethical.
FACT: A 2000 Committee on Gov’t Reform in the U.S. House of representatives found that the chair of the FDA and the CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee owned stock in drug companies that make vaccines. Individuals on both committees own patents for vaccines under consideration or affected by the decisions of the committees.
FACT: In 2010 the ACIP established the first recommendation for universal flu vaccination for every U.S. citizen over 6 months of age. This policy has been supported and implemented with dogmatic vigor by nurses and medical doctors. There is NO VALID DATA of effectiveness or benefit to support this policy.
Again, I reiterate, the flu vaccine policy is the litmus test. IF the above is true, if the research scientists who publish this are not quacks, if the Cochrane Review scientists are not quacks, if the conflicts of interest of the policy makers are true, if the blind implementation of the policy has taken place, then we have to at least accept the possibility that other vaccine policies could have similar issues. No conspiracy theories, no dogma, no emotional debates. Let’s just look at the data. You don’t need to be an immunologist or a medical doctor or a scientist, you just need to look at the available data. What does the actual data say?
No evidence, no controlled trials, no proven benefit, hugely exaggerated risks and benefits, flu vaccine patent holders or vaccine manufacturer company stock holders on the panel that creates flu shot guidelines, ever increasing number of people recommended for flu shots since 1980, ever increasing numbers of people receiving flu shot since 1980 (from 15%-65% coverage), and, in the midst of all this, increasing rates of flu infection rate and death rates associate with flu.
How can this happen? Well if you claim your product reduces death by 50% and you get people to believe it you are going to get policy makers willing to mandate it and clinicians willing to administer it – with fervor! Most importantly, once you can get the benefits believed as gospel you can prevent studies that compare vaccination to non-vaccination because it becomes immoral to withhold an intervention that has been “proven” to reduce death by 50%. I should say it becomes perceived as immoral to withhold an intervention that has been falsely assumed to be proven to reduce death by 50%.
If this is true, what does that tell us about other vaccines? Do we have similar beliefs and assumptions about other vaccines based on similar manipulation of data?
If this can be true, is it remotely possible that other vaccine campaigns could have similar issues? The answer is, without any reasonable doubt, yes; at the very least it is a possibility. That’s all I advocate for, the admission that it is a possibility based on the fact that we have other provable examples of unethical and dishonest reporting of evidence regarding vaccine effectiveness.
As long as someone can convince you that it is not a possibility that the pharmaceutical companies that are convicted felons in other cases of fraudulent claims of benefit and deliberately hiding known risks of their products, including deaths (think opioids and Thalidomide and Vioxx for just a very few examples), or the politicians these convicted felons spend billions of dollars on to lobby, or the medical doctors they spend billions on to lobby, educate, and bribe, could never commit such acts, even though they have been proven to do so many times in the past, then the valid research will just never get demanded ordone. What do we have to lose by doing the research? Well, if you are a flu vaccine advocate you say the randomized placebo-controlled trials – the only kind of trial that can establish benefit from the vaccine- cannot ethically be conducted because it is unethical to deny any citizen the enormous benefit of a 50% reduction in death (which of course is PROVEN FALSE). It is clever, I will admit that.
Some Logical, Ethical Questions Regarding Mass Vaccination Policy
The simplest, and to me most logical, ethical, and most revealing questions to ask regarding current mass vaccine policy are:
What were the death rates in Western countries from the childhood illnesses like measles, mumps, and pertussis in the years and decades prior to the implementation of the mass vaccination campaign compared to the death rates after implementation of this campaign?
If death rates from these childhood illnesses were steadily declining exponentially prior to mass vaccination how can this be explained – what caused the exponential decline in death rates from these illnesses prior to mass vaccination? Was what caused the decline prior to mass vaccination magically removed as a contributing variable after mass vaccination?
What were the atopic disorder rates prior to and after mass vaccination? What were the other childhood illness rates prior to and after mass vaccination?
Why are there different vaccination schedules in different countries and do the countries with fewer vaccinations have more illness and more deaths from illness? If not, how can the policies with more required vaccinations be justified?
What is the actual morbidity and mortality risks from these childhood diseases in populations that are well nourished and have access to proper medical care? How many cases of measles or pertussis in Western nations over the past 50 years have resulted in serious morbidity or mortality?
Are there cases of these illnesses reported in fully vaccinated children? If so, how can this be explained?
Are the death rate statistics quoted for these childhood illnesses from representative populations or are they deliberately taken from poor countries with malnourished children? Are the death rate statistics deliberately taken from eras during higher death rates that deliberately leave out the eras with very low death rates – for example the decades immediately prior to the implementation of mass vaccination?
Some Logical, Ethical Questions Regarding Autism
We know autism is not genetic, an illness that has incidence rates that have risen exponentially over a short period of time cannot possibly be genetic. Thus, we know autism has an environmental cause and is thus preventable. There is an environmental variable or variables that have caused the rapid increase in autism rates.
Autism is a debilitating illness, both to the child and to the family. Autism rates are so high and the cost of care so emotionally, financially, and time/effort expensive that the illness is and will continue to drastically effect not just families but the education system and our culture.
Autism now represents the single greatest health threat to children in North America; it is more prevalent and more devastating to the childhood and parental populations than any other childhood illness.
Despite the prevalence and the seriousness, there has been no major government, scientific, or medical commissions to study all possible causes. This has never been the case with any other serious and prevalent childhood epidemic. Polio was without a doubt a very serious threat, look how we responded to that threat. Childhood cancers, though rare, are a devastating threat. Look how we have responded to childhood cancers. Why are we not responding to the threat of autism in the same way with the same resources?
Are rates of autism different in different countries? If so, how is this explained?
If the vaccines are effective, then why would a non-vaccinated individual pose a threat to a vaccinated individual?
The only way to validly determine the effectiveness of any vaccine (or any intervention for that matter) is to conduct a proper randomized controlled placebo trial where one group is given the vaccine and the other is given a placebo vaccine and then both groups get controlled exposure to the pathogen. This has NEVER been done, not even with the flu shot, and not even, to my knowledge, in animal studies!!
Source
Childrens Health Defense
We do the research you decide,
Love and Light
The Healing Oracle Team
Please join our growing numbers on MeWe: Healing Oracle
Also join us on YouTube
Global Petition
Please
Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.
If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.
Keep Us Advertising Free
Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.
Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side (on Desktop), or the donations box below (on Mobile)
Please join our growing numbers onAlso join us on Twitter Please sign our global petition against enforced vaccinations The intention of this petition is to present 5 million signatures to each President, Prime Minister, Health Minister and heads of state worldwide.Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side, or the donations box below
[social_warfare]


healingoracle--2020-07-15--HOW CORONAVIRUS WAS A GLOBAL UN TRAINING EXERCISE IN “PREPAREDNESS”

As many of us are now waking up to the fact that the entire Corona Virus has been an exercise in control , we see further documents emerging ( and have in fact been publicly available all along ) that lay out how all UN member countries acted in compliance with an agreement that was signed in 2005 by 194 countries .
Please watch this video below that highlights the international health regulations documentation that lays out how this was all planned .
It is a Live training exercise that must complete by September 2020 .
Global Medical despotism is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a genuine conspiracy .
This is the link to the International Health Regulations page on the WHO website .
https : //www.who.int/health-topics/international-health-regulations # tab=tab_1 And here is a link to Global Pandemic Monitoring Board ( GPMB ) 2019 report .
You will note that all countries must be in compliance with the health regulations by September 2020 .
If you look at page 39 you will this little tidbit : “ The United Nations ( including WHO ) conducts at least two systemwide training and simulation exercises , including one covering the deliberate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf If you weren ’ t aware of the GPMB , you are going to be shocked who is on the board .
A couple of entities involved are the World Bank , the Gates Foundation , Anthony Fauci…you get the point .
They are all listed .
The bottom line is the US has signed an agreement to be in compliance with laws from an international body .
The WHO claims that it is legally binding .
They even strongly suggest that each nation enact legislation down to the municipal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US compliant with the WHO regulations .
Share this far and wide DOCS HERE : A World at Risk , 2019 , Annual Report GPMB : https : //apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annu… International Health Regulations ( 2005 ) https : //www.who.int/ihr/publications/… Some of the links/pages I referenced during this talk : https : //www.who.int/ihr/about/en/ https : //www.who.int/gho/ihr/en/ https : //www.gatesfoundation.org/How-W… https : //www.aspeninstitute.org/ https : //www.gatesfoundation.org/searc… We do the research you do decide , Love and Light The Healing Oracle Team Please join our Facebook group Also join our growing numbers on MeWe : Healing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Petition Please Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level .
If we stand as one , we have a chance of saving the children of the future .
Keep Us Advertising Free Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers .
If you find the posts and resources useful , please consider making a contribution to support us ( in any amount ) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world .
We feel that giving a voice to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or that of a loved one , with alternative treatment is an important mission .
Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue .
Donate .
Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts , please use the ‘ donations ’ box above on the top right hand side ( on Desktop ) , or the donations box below ( on Mobile ) Please join our Facebook group The Healing Oracle for more open and unrestricted views and discussions on health.Also join our growing numbers onAlso join @ @ @ @ @ @ @ petition against enforced vaccinations The intention of this petition is to present 5 million signatures to each President , Prime Minister , Health Minister and heads of state worldwide.Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.If we stand as one , we have a chance of saving the children of the future.Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers .
If you find the posts and resources useful , please consider making a contribution to support us ( in any amount ) so we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the world .
We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health , or that of a loved one , with alternative treatment is an important mission .
Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.Donate .
Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts , please use the ‘ donations ’ box above on the top right hand side , or the donations box below

As many of us are now waking up to the fact that the entire Corona Virus has been an exercise in control, we see further documents emerging (and have in fact been publicly available all along) that lay out how all UN member countries acted in compliance with an agreement that was signed in 2005 by 194 countries.
Please watch this video below that highlights the international health regulations documentation that lays out how this was all planned. It is a Live training exercise that must complete by September 2020.
Global Medical despotism is not a conspiracy theory. It is a genuine conspiracy.
This is the link to the International Health Regulations page on the WHO website.
https://www.who.int/health-topics/international-health-regulations#tab=tab_1
And here is a link to Global Pandemic Monitoring Board (GPMB) 2019 report. You will note that all countries must be in compliance with the health regulations by September 2020. If you look at page 39 you will this little tidbit:
“The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two systemwide training and simulation exercises, including one covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.”
https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf
If you weren’t aware of the GPMB, you are going to be shocked who is on the board. A couple of entities involved are the World Bank, the Gates Foundation, Anthony Fauci…you get the point. They are all listed.
The bottom line is the US has signed an agreement to be in compliance with laws from an international body. The WHO claims that it is legally binding. They even strongly suggest that each nation enact legislation down to the municipal level (schools) that with make the US compliant with the WHO regulations.
Share this far and wide
Source: Humans are free and Richard Batista
DOCS HERE: A World at Risk, 2019, Annual Report GPMB: https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annu… International Health Regulations (2005) https://www.who.int/ihr/publications/… Some of the links/pages I referenced during this talk: https://www.who.int/ihr/about/en/ https://www.who.int/gho/ihr/en/ https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-W… https://www.aspeninstitute.org/ https://www.gatesfoundation.org/searc…
We do the research you decide,
Love and Light
The Healing Oracle Team
Please join our growing numbers on MeWe: Healing Oracle
Also join us on YouTube
Global Petition
Please
Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.
If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.
Keep Us Advertising Free
Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.
Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side (on Desktop), or the donations box below (on Mobile)
Please join our growing numbers onAlso join us on Twitter Please sign our global petition against enforced vaccinations The intention of this petition is to present 5 million signatures to each President, Prime Minister, Health Minister and heads of state worldwide.Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side, or the donations box below
[social_warfare]


healingoracle--2020-07-15--STUDY FINDS ALMOST NO COVID SPREAD IN SCHOOLS THAT REOPENED EARLIER THIS SPRING

A study out of Germany has become one of the first to examine COVID transmission in schools .
The study by the University of Dresden tested more than 2,000 schoolchildren and teachers for antibodies since the reopening of schools in Germany in the spring .
The study found no evidence of widespread virus transmission .
Antibodies were detected in only twelve of the 2,045 people examined .
That is not much more than at the beginning of the pandemic in March , meaning that very few schoolchildren caught the disease .
Instead of fears that schools would become hotspots for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opposite , ” said study director Reinhard Berner , director of the polyclinic for children and adolescent medicine at the Dresden University Hospital .
“ Children act more like a brake on the infection .
Not every infection that reaches them is passed on.
” Antibodies were also not found to be above average in the teachers at the facilities .
Saxony was the first federal state in Germany to restart regular school operations after the lockdown ended in mid-April .
The Ministry of Education ordered the school opening to be scientifically studied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between the ages of 14 and 18 , and 500 teachers between the ages of 30 and 66 were examined Saxony ’ s Minister of Education said the study shows that the decision was right to reopen schools early , and that schools should continue as normal in the fall , even if the overall infection rate should increase again .
“ The right of children and adolescents to education and participation and equal opportunities must not be neglected when considering anti-infection measures , ” said the minister .
the spread of coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have been overestimated .
A study by the Faculty of Medicine at the Technical University of Dresden , for which more than 2000 students and teachers have been tested for antibodies since the reopening of schools in Saxony in the spring , did not provide any evidence that the virus is spreading particularly rapidly in schools , nor that it is transmitted particularly frequently by children .
“ It ’ s the opposite , ” said study leader Reinhard Berner , director of the Polyclinic for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine at Dresden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely to act as brake pads of infection .
Not every infection that arrives at them is passed on.
” In addition , doctors found that the level of immunization against corona was “ significantly lower than predicted.
” In only twelve of the 2045 blood samples examined , antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus could undoubtedly have been detected , Berner said .
“ This means that the level of immunization in the study group is well below one percent and further below what we expected.
” The immunisation rate is thus no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pandemic in March .
At the same time , the researchers were unable to detect any further spread in schools where there was at least one confirmed corona case .
Pupils and teachers of these institutions did not have more antibodies detectable above average .
“ This suggests that schools have not become hotspots , ” Berner said .
In mid-April , Saxony was the first state to start a restricted regular operation in schools after the lockdown .
However , due to a lack of knowledge about the spread of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dresden had ordered scientific support for the opening of the school .
For their sample , the researchers selected 13 schools in the districts of Bautzen and Görlitz as well as in the state capital Dresden .
A total of around 1,500 pupils aged between 14 and 18 and 500 teachers aged between 30 and 66 were examined .
Some of the schools had previously tested positive for corona , and five participants said they had been infected with corona .
A member of the family had previously tested positive in a further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The fact that , in addition to the five participants who knew about their infection , only seven others were tested positive speaks for a much lower dark figure than assumed , berner said .
The results also showed that the virus is not transmitted as dynamically in families as thought .
Only one of the participants from the 24 households with a known corona infection had antibodies in the test .
“ This means that the majority of school children have not experienced an infection themselves , despite an infection in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This finding must also be taken into account when deciding on contact restriction measures.
” If you add the Google translate extension then you can see this is a good translation We do the research you do decide , Love and Light The Healing Oracle Team Please join our Facebook group Also join our growing numbers on MeWe : Healing Oracle Also join us on YouTube Global Petition Please Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level .
If we stand as one , we have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future .
Keep Us Advertising Free Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers .
If you find the posts and resources useful , please consider making a contribution to support us ( in any amount ) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world .
We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health , or that of a loved one , with alternative treatment is an important mission .
Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kindly donate towards our time and efforts , please use the ‘ donations ’ box above on the top right hand side ( on Desktop ) , or the donations box below ( on Mobile ) Please join our Facebook group The Healing Oracle for more open and unrestricted views and discussions on health.Also join our growing numbers onAlso join us on Twitter Please sign our global petition against enforced vaccinations The intention of this petition is to present 5 million signatures to each President , Prime Minister , Health Minister and heads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and need to be tackled on a global level.If we stand as one , we have a chance of saving the children of the future.Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers .
If you find the posts and resources useful , please consider making a contribution to support us ( in any amount ) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world .
We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health , or that of a loved one , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.Donate .
Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts , please use the ‘ donations ’ box above on the top right hand side , or the donations box below

A study out of Germany has become one of the first to examine COVID transmission in schools. The study by the University of Dresden tested more than 2,000 schoolchildren and teachers for antibodies since the reopening of schools in Germany in the spring.
by Kevin Ryan
The study found no evidence of widespread virus transmission. Antibodies were detected in only twelve of the 2,045 people examined. That is not much more than at the beginning of the pandemic in March, meaning that very few schoolchildren caught the disease.
Instead of fears that schools would become hotspots for transmission, “It is rather the opposite,” said study director Reinhard Berner, director of the polyclinic for children and adolescent medicine at the Dresden University Hospital. “Children act more like a brake on the infection. Not every infection that reaches them is passed on.”
Antibodies were also not found to be above average in the teachers at the facilities.
Saxony was the first federal state in Germany to restart regular school operations after the lockdown ended in mid-April. The Ministry of Education ordered the school opening to be scientifically studied. A total of around 1,500 students between the ages of 14 and 18, and 500 teachers between the ages of 30 and 66 were examined
Saxony’s Minister of Education said the study shows that the decision was right to reopen schools early, and that schools should continue as normal in the fall, even if the overall infection rate should increase again.
“The right of children and adolescents to education and participation and equal opportunities must not be neglected when considering anti-infection measures,” said the minister.
the spread of coronavirus in kindergartens, schools and families seems to have been overestimated. A study by the Faculty of Medicine at the Technical University of Dresden, for which more than 2000 students and teachers have been tested for antibodies since the reopening of schools in Saxony in the spring, did not provide any evidence that the virus is spreading particularly rapidly in schools, nor that it is transmitted particularly frequently by children. “It’s the opposite,” said study leader Reinhard Berner, director of the Polyclinic for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine at Dresden University Hospital. “Children are more likely to act as brake pads of infection. Not every infection that arrives at them is passed on.”
In addition, doctors found that the level of immunization against corona was “significantly lower than predicted.” In only twelve of the 2045 blood samples examined, antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus could undoubtedly have been detected, Berner said. “This means that the level of immunization in the study group is well below one percent and further below what we expected.” The immunisation rate is thus no higher today than at the beginning of the pandemic in March.
Samples at 13 schools
At the same time, the researchers were unable to detect any further spread in schools where there was at least one confirmed corona case. Pupils and teachers of these institutions did not have more antibodies detectable above average. “This suggests that schools have not become hotspots,” Berner said.
In mid-April, Saxony was the first state to start a restricted regular operation in schools after the lockdown. However, due to a lack of knowledge about the spread of the virus, the Ministry of Education in Dresden had ordered scientific support for the opening of the school.
For their sample, the researchers selected 13 schools in the districts of Bautzen and Görlitz as well as in the state capital Dresden. A total of around 1,500 pupils aged between 14 and 18 and 500 teachers aged between 30 and 66 were examined. Some of the schools had previously tested positive for corona, and five participants said they had been infected with corona. A member of the family had previously tested positive in a further 24 households in the participating group.
The fact that, in addition to the five participants who knew about their infection, only seven others were tested positive speaks for a much lower dark figure than assumed, berner said. The results also showed that the virus is not transmitted as dynamically in families as thought. Only one of the participants from the 24 households with a known corona infection had antibodies in the test. “This means that the majority of school children have not experienced an infection themselves, despite an infection in the household,” Berner said. “This finding must also be taken into account when deciding on contact restriction measures.”
SOURCE: Faznet (translated)
If you add the Google translate extension then you can see this is a good translation
We do the research you decide,
Love and Light
The Healing Oracle Team
Please join our growing numbers on MeWe: Healing Oracle
Also join us on YouTube
Global Petition
Please
Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.
If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.
Keep Us Advertising Free
Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.
Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side (on Desktop), or the donations box below (on Mobile)
Please join our growing numbers onAlso join us on Twitter Please sign our global petition against enforced vaccinations The intention of this petition is to present 5 million signatures to each President, Prime Minister, Health Minister and heads of state worldwide.Vaccines are a global problem and need to be tackled on a global level.If we stand as one, we have a chance of saving the children of the future.Healing Oracle is made possible by the support of its readers. If you find the posts and resources useful, please consider making a contribution to support us (in any amount) so we can continue to inform and assist people around the world. We feel that giving a voice to those who have transformed their health, or that of a loved one, with alternative treatment is an important mission. Thank you for valuing our work and helping it to continue.Donate. Should you choose to kindly donate towards our time and efforts, please use the ‘donations’ box above on the top right hand side, or the donations box below
[social_warfare]