naturalnews--2020-02-14--Could coronavirus infect 80 percent of humanity? Hong Kong scientist says yes

( Natural News ) The only country outside of China that really seems to be taking the threat of novel coronavirus seriously is Hong Kong , with the chair of public health medicine at The University of Hong Kong now warning that upwards of 80 percent of the global population could end up succumbing to the deadly virus .
Of the billions of people that could end up falling ill , says Professor Gabriel Leung , about 51 million will likely die from it – as a conservative estimate .
And as for communist China ’ s data on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own borders , Leung is convinced that the Chicoms are hiding the true numbers and spinning their own false narrative for political purposes .
Despite the number of new coronavirus infections in China said to be experiencing a “ slowdown , ” cases outside of China are on the rise like never before , with nearly 500 confirmed cases of coronavirus outside of China .
“ Sixty per cent of the world ’ s population is an awfully big number , ” Leung reportedly told The Guardian during a recent interview , referring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ percent global infection prediction .
World Health Organization ( WHO ) Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus similarly told the media that we could be seeing only “ the tip of the iceberg ” in terms of just how far , and virulently , Wuhan coronavirus will continue to spread before things get any better with the situation .
In Leung ’ s view , the scientific community ’ s “ overriding concern ” with novel coronavirus is identifying the “ size and shape ” of this iceberg , meaning how much of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just waiting to emerge unexpectedly .
If you ’ re interested in learning more about how to naturally protect yourself and your family against coronavirus , be sure to check out the following episode of The Health Ranger Report , in which Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , talks about three natural molecules that can help to fight the coronavirus pandemic : If novel coronavirus kills 15 percent of its victims , as many as 600 million people could die Leung ’ s 51 million deaths prediction is based on a lower-end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Should the actual percentage be closer to the 15 percent , or even 17 percent , predicted by others , the death tally when all is said and done could be closer to 600 million – or even more .
Time will tell , though , as scientists are still trying to determine whether or not communist China ’ s draconian containment measures – which are basically martial law being applied to a population larger than the total number here in the United States – will have the effect of truly curbing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decline .
At an upcoming WHO meeting in Geneva , Switzerland , Leung and more than 400 other researchers and national authorities will reportedly participate , offering their expertise and insight into the situation .
Some will attend in person , while others will participate via video conference from mainland Taiwan .
“ Is 60-80 percent of the world ’ s population going to get infected ?
Maybe not , ” Leung says .
“ Maybe this will come in waves .
Maybe the virus is going to attenuate its lethality because it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it kills everybody in its path because it will get killed as well.
” Leung further warns that if the experts fail to identify the truth about the outbreak in its current state , there will be no stopping it from creating a worst-case scenario like the one he ’ s predicting .
To keep up with the latest coronavirus news , be sure to check out Pandemic.news .
You can also explore the extensive Health Ranger Report archive of coronavirus news in video format at the official Health Ranger Report Brighteon channel @

Could coronavirus infect 80 percent of humanity? Hong Kong scientist says yes
The only country outside of China that really seems to be taking the threat of novel coronavirus seriously is Hong Kong, with the chair of public health medicine at The University of Hong Kong now warning that upwards of 80 percent of the global population could end up succumbing to the deadly virus.
Of the billions of people that could end up falling ill, says Professor Gabriel Leung, about 51 million will likely die from it – as a conservative estimate. And as for communist China's data on the number of infections and deaths within its own borders, Leung is convinced that the Chicoms are hiding the true numbers and spinning their own false narrative for political purposes.
Despite the number of new coronavirus infections in China said to be experiencing a "slowdown," cases outside of China are on the rise like never before, with nearly 500 confirmed cases of coronavirus outside of China.
"Sixty per cent of the world's population is an awfully big number," Leung reportedly told The Guardian during a recent interview, referring to the lower end of his 60-80 percent global infection prediction.
World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus similarly told the media that we could be seeing only "the tip of the iceberg" in terms of just how far, and virulently, Wuhan coronavirus will continue to spread before things get any better with the situation.
In Leung's view, the scientific community's "overriding concern" with novel coronavirus is identifying the "size and shape" of this iceberg, meaning how much of the outbreak is still hiding underneath the surface just waiting to emerge unexpectedly.
If you're interested in learning more about how to naturally protect yourself and your family against coronavirus, be sure to check out the following episode of The Health Ranger Report, in which Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about three natural molecules that can help to fight the coronavirus pandemic:
If novel coronavirus kills 15 percent of its victims, as many as 600 million people could die
Leung's 51 million deaths prediction is based on a lower-end fatality estimate of just one percent. Should the actual percentage be closer to the 15 percent, or even 17 percent, predicted by others, the death tally when all is said and done could be closer to 600 million – or even more.
Time will tell, though, as scientists are still trying to determine whether or not communist China's draconian containment measures – which are basically martial law being applied to a population larger than the total number here in the United States – will have the effect of truly curbing the outbreak and tipping it into a true decline.
At an upcoming WHO meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, Leung and more than 400 other researchers and national authorities will reportedly participate, offering their expertise and insight into the situation. Some will attend in person, while others will participate via video conference from mainland Taiwan.
"Is 60-80 percent of the world's population going to get infected? Maybe not," Leung says. "Maybe this will come in waves. Maybe the virus is going to attenuate its lethality because it certainly doesn't help it if it kills everybody in its path because it will get killed as well."
Leung further warns that if the experts fail to identify the truth about the outbreak in its current state, there will be no stopping it from creating a worst-case scenario like the one he's predicting.
To keep up with the latest coronavirus news, be sure to check out Pandemic.news.
You can also explore the extensive Health Ranger Report archive of coronavirus news in video format at the official Health Ranger Report Brighteon channel.
Sources for this article include:
ZeroHedge.com
TheMostImportantNews.com
NaturalNews.com
Brighteon.com


naturalnews--2020-02-14--The vast majority of our pharmaceuticals, vitamins and supplements are made in China – is coronaviru

( Natural News ) As Americans watch , mostly from the comfort of their own homes , the nation of China is descending into medical martial law , and the thing that most of us aren ’ t fully comprehending at this point is how the Wuhan coronavirus threatens to cut off the supply of critical goods to the United States .
Even if it never becomes a full-blown pandemic here on our soil , the novel coronavirus is right now interfering with the production of all sorts of things that most of us take for granted every single day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and car parts to kitchen appliances , are all mostly made in China these days – which means if they ’ re not making them , we ’ re not getting them .
Since hundreds of millions of Chinese people aren ’ t being allowed to go back to work due to mandatory quarantines , and the factories they work at aren ’ t opening as planned post-Chinese Lunar New Year , then it ’ s only a matter of time before we start to see the horrific impact of this in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big box stores and no more vitamins at the health food shops .
China itself is already facing an economic crisis that some reports are tabulating to the tune of about $ 60 billion .
And if the outbreak isn ’ t very soon contained , this number could rapidly balloon to about $ 6 trillion , completely collapsing the Chinese economy and all other economies to which it ’ s currently tied .
“ The United States and China are intimately linked economically , ” warns The Organic Prepper .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as well as the availability of many essential products that are made in China.
” Be sure to check out the following episode of The Health Ranger Report , in which Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , talks about how there ’ s no way China would be closing so many factories if coronavirus mortality is really only two percent as Chinese authorities are claiming : About 80 percent of Big Pharma ’ s meds come from China From a medicine availability standpoint , a total shutdown of China ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a total shutdown of our own , seeing as how about 80 percent of Big Pharma ’ s drugs come from , or are made from ingredients produced in , communist China .
What this means is that if there ’ s even the slightest of interruptions for key pharmaceutical ingredients made in China , drug manufacturers won ’ t be able to produce the medications that tens of millions of Americans rely on as part of their preferred health regimens .
Specifically affected would be things like antidepressants , tranquilizers , psychotropics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ run dry quicker than most people would probably assume .
Also impacted would be anti-malaria drugs , ADHD drugs , thyroid and hormone drugs , as well as the many dozens of vaccines now on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ’ s ( CDC ) official schedule .
Most rubber and metal products are made in China , along with machinery , computers and car components It ’ s not just pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements , either .
Reports indicate that most of the things Americans rely on each day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made in China , or at least their raw materials come from China .
It didn ’ t used to be this way , of course .
Before globalization took hold in our political system , America produced a bulk of its own goods – that is , until the globalist politicians from both political parties sold us all down the river by handing all manufacturing over to China .
Now , we have to import things like tires , HVAC units , appliances , textiles , metalworks , car parts , computers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , broadcast equipment , tractors , concrete mixers , and practically anything else you can think of that keeps the system going directly from China .
Even natural medicine like coenzyme Q10 , B vitamins , and vitamin C often come from China , which means no more of these on store shelves , either .
This is why self-reliance is so important : because there ’ s no telling just how bad this whole thing gets before it starts to get any better – if it ever even gets better at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s also our own economy to worry about which , apart from China , isn ’ t exactly thriving .
“ As we monitor reports of farmers going bankrupt , shopping malls going dark , homeless encampments growing ( despite local governments trying to destroy them ) , stock markets sagging , real estate markets hesitating , and the ‘ Everything Bubble ’ created by Federal Reserve funny money leaking air , it ’ s worth remembering that in 1930 some 30 % of the population still lived on farms and knew how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at The Organic Prepper .
“ … in contrast to today as that percentage on farms has dropped to around 1-2 % .
” To keep up with the latest about how novel coronavirus is impacting the global economy , be sure to check out Pandemic.news .
There ’ s also a wealth of additional coronavirus coverage in video format available at the official Health Ranger Report Brighteon channel .

The vast majority of our pharmaceuticals, vitamins and supplements are made in China – is coronavirus the black swan event that will collapse it all?
As Americans watch, mostly from the comfort of their own homes, the nation of China is descending into medical martial law, and the thing that most of us aren't fully comprehending at this point is how the Wuhan coronavirus threatens to cut off the supply of critical goods to the United States.
Even if it never becomes a full-blown pandemic here on our soil, the novel coronavirus is right now interfering with the production of all sorts of things that most of us take for granted every single day. Everything from pharmaceuticals to dietary supplements, and car parts to kitchen appliances, are all mostly made in China these days – which means if they're not making them, we're not getting them.
Since hundreds of millions of Chinese people aren't being allowed to go back to work due to mandatory quarantines, and the factories they work at aren't opening as planned post-Chinese Lunar New Year, then it's only a matter of time before we start to see the horrific impact of this in the form of empty shelves at the big box stores and no more vitamins at the health food shops.
China itself is already facing an economic crisis that some reports are tabulating to the tune of about $60 billion. And if the outbreak isn't very soon contained, this number could rapidly balloon to about $6 trillion, completely collapsing the Chinese economy and all other economies to which it's currently tied.
"The United States and China are intimately linked economically," warns The Organic Prepper. "The coronavirus outbreak could directly affect our economy, as well as the availability of many essential products that are made in China."
Be sure to check out the following episode of The Health Ranger Report, in which Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about how there's no way China would be closing so many factories if coronavirus mortality is really only two percent as Chinese authorities are claiming:
About 80 percent of Big Pharma's meds come from China
From a medicine availability standpoint, a total shutdown of China's pharmaceutical industry due to coronavirus would mean a total shutdown of our own, seeing as how about 80 percent of Big Pharma's drugs come from, or are made from ingredients produced in, communist China.
What this means is that if there's even the slightest of interruptions for key pharmaceutical ingredients made in China, drug manufacturers won't be able to produce the medications that tens of millions of Americans rely on as part of their preferred health regimens.
Specifically affected would be things like antidepressants, tranquilizers, psychotropics and anesthesia, all of which could run dry quicker than most people would probably assume. Also impacted would be anti-malaria drugs, ADHD drugs, thyroid and hormone drugs, as well as the many dozens of vaccines now on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) official schedule.
Most rubber and metal products are made in China, along with machinery, computers and car components
It's not just pharmaceuticals and dietary supplements, either. Reports indicate that most of the things Americans rely on each day to live are either partially or fully made in China, or at least their raw materials come from China.
It didn't used to be this way, of course. Before globalization took hold in our political system, America produced a bulk of its own goods – that is, until the globalist politicians from both political parties sold us all down the river by handing all manufacturing over to China.
Now, we have to import things like tires, HVAC units, appliances, textiles, metalworks, car parts, computers, machinery, medical devices, motors, broadcast equipment, tractors, concrete mixers, and practically anything else you can think of that keeps the system going directly from China.
Even natural medicine like coenzyme Q10, B vitamins, and vitamin C often come from China, which means no more of these on store shelves, either.
This is why self-reliance is so important: because there's no telling just how bad this whole thing gets before it starts to get any better – if it ever even gets better at all, of course. And there's also our own economy to worry about which, apart from China, isn't exactly thriving.
"As we monitor reports of farmers going bankrupt, shopping malls going dark, homeless encampments growing (despite local governments trying to destroy them), stock markets sagging, real estate markets hesitating, and the 'Everything Bubble' created by Federal Reserve funny money leaking air, it's worth remembering that in 1930 some 30% of the population still lived on farms and knew how to garden," wrote one commenter at The Organic Prepper.
"... in contrast to today as that percentage on farms has dropped to around 1-2%."
To keep up with the latest about how novel coronavirus is impacting the global economy, be sure to check out Pandemic.news.
There's also a wealth of additional coronavirus coverage in video format available at the official Health Ranger Report Brighteon channel.
Sources for this article include:
TheOrganicPrepper.com
NaturalNews.com
NBCNews.com
Brighteon.com


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Pentagon orders NORTHCOM to prepare for coronavirus “pandemic” as fears mount that China can’t stop

( Natural News ) In the best indicator yet that the U.S. government is growing concerned that the Chinese government is incapable of containing the spread of the coronavirus beyond its borders , the Pentagon is ordering its various domestic commands to prepare for a “ pandemic.
” As reported by Military Times , U.S. Northern Command ( NORTHCOM ) is currently executing plans to prepare for a wide outbreak of the virus , in large part by taking stock of available resources that would be called into action should a pandemic occur .
An executive order issued by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mark Esper this month directed Northern Command and geographic combatant commanders to initiate pandemic plans , which include ordering commanders to prepare for widespread outbreaks and confining service members with a history of travel to China .
The order was distributed via service-wide messages to the Navy and Marine Corps , issued Tuesday and Wednesday , respectively .
They reference the order which directs NORTHCOM to begin implementing The Department of Defense Global Campaign plan for Pandemic Influenza and Infectious Diseases 3551-13 .
This is the military ’ s plan for dealing with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Pentagon attempted to downplay the issuance of the executive order , stating that in no way “ does the planning indicate a greater likelihood of an event developing .
As military professionals , planning for a range of contingencies is something we owe the American people , ” Navy Lt. Cmdr .
Mike Hatfield said .
“ The military profession fosters a culture of planning , and the fact that we are coordinating planning efforts across the geographical combatant commands is consistent with how we prepare to respond , if directed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think we need to be prepared ’ Perhaps .
But then , as USA Features News reported , a series of experts told a Senate committee on Wednesday that they believe the U.S. should begin preparing now for a nationwide epidemic they believe is coming : Public health experts said during congressional testimony on Wednesday the United States should be preparing for “ thousands ” of new coronavirus cases rather than believing that only a couple will emerge .
Asha George , executive director of the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense , told the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ I don ’ t think we should be planning for the onesie-twosie cases that we ’ ve been seeing thus far in the United States .
“ We have to plan for the possibility that we have thousands of cases , ” she added .
George was one of five health experts senators called to testify about the potential spread of the virus , officially called COVID-19 .
The hearing came as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta identified the 14th U.S. victim .
Scott Gottlieb , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told the panel he expects an outbreak to reveal itself across the United States in the next two to four weeks .
“ We should be leaning in very aggressively to try to broaden diagnostic screening right now , particularly in communities where there is a lot of immigration ; where these efforts could emerge to identify them early enough ; that they ’ ll be small enough ; that we can intervene to prevent more epidemic spread in this country , ” he noted .
One of the biggest fears among U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the slow incubation period of the virus .
Experts note that because it takes several days before symptoms can appear , people can be admitted to the country before anyone realizes they are stricken with the disease .
“ Some of the modeling out of the UK suggests that we ’ re capturing about 25 percent of cases at best .
So for every case we identify , there ’ s three or four that we didn ’ t identify , ” Gottlieb said .
A former director of the Centers for Disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Julie Gerberding , told the Senate committee because health officials were initially unable to control the spread of the virus , “ I think we need to be prepared for what are we going to do to try to slow down the spread .
”

Pentagon orders NORTHCOM to prepare for coronavirus “pandemic” as fears mount that China can’t stop it from spreading around the world
In the best indicator yet that the U.S. government is growing concerned that the Chinese government is incapable of containing the spread of the coronavirus beyond its borders, the Pentagon is ordering its various domestic commands to prepare for a “pandemic.”
As reported by Military Times, U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) is currently executing plans to prepare for a wide outbreak of the virus, in large part by taking stock of available resources that would be called into action should a pandemic occur.
The site noted:
An executive order issued by the Joint Staff and approved by Defense Secretary Mark Esper this month directed Northern Command and geographic combatant commanders to initiate pandemic plans, which include ordering commanders to prepare for widespread outbreaks and confining service members with a history of travel to China.
The order was distributed via service-wide messages to the Navy and Marine Corps, issued Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively. They reference the order which directs NORTHCOM to begin implementing The Department of Defense Global Campaign plan for Pandemic Influenza and Infectious Diseases 3551-13.
This is the military’s plan for dealing with widespread influenza and other diseases like coronavirus.
The Pentagon attempted to downplay the issuance of the executive order, stating that in no way “does the planning indicate a greater likelihood of an event developing. As military professionals, planning for a range of contingencies is something we owe the American people," Navy Lt. Cmdr. Mike Hatfield said.
“The military profession fosters a culture of planning, and the fact that we are coordinating planning efforts across the geographical combatant commands is consistent with how we prepare to respond, if directed,” Hatfield continued.
‘I think we need to be prepared’
Perhaps. But then, as USA Features News reported, a series of experts told a Senate committee on Wednesday that they believe the U.S. should begin preparing now for a nationwide epidemic they believe is coming:
Public health experts said during congressional testimony on Wednesday the United States should be preparing for “thousands” of new coronavirus cases rather than believing that only a couple will emerge.
Asha George, executive director of the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense, told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, “I don’t think we should be planning for the onesie-twosie cases that we’ve been seeing thus far in the United States.
“We have to plan for the possibility that we have thousands of cases,” she added.
George was one of five health experts senators called to testify about the potential spread of the virus, officially called COVID-19. The hearing came as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta identified the 14th U.S. victim.
Scott Gottlieb, a former Food and Drug Administration commissioner, told the panel he expects an outbreak to reveal itself across the United States in the next two to four weeks.
“We should be leaning in very aggressively to try to broaden diagnostic screening right now, particularly in communities where there is a lot of immigration; where these efforts could emerge to identify them early enough; that they’ll be small enough; that we can intervene to prevent more epidemic spread in this country,” he noted.
One of the biggest fears among U.S. military leaders and government health experts is the slow incubation period of the virus. Experts note that because it takes several days before symptoms can appear, people can be admitted to the country before anyone realizes they are stricken with the disease.
“Some of the modeling out of the UK suggests that we’re capturing about 25 percent of cases at best. So for every case we identify, there’s three or four that we didn’t identify,” Gottlieb said.
A former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Julie Gerberding, told the Senate committee because health officials were initially unable to control the spread of the virus, “I think we need to be prepared for what are we going to do to try to slow down the spread.”
Sources include:
USAFeatures.news
MilitaryTimes.com
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Mainstream media beginning to catch up to Natural News in reporting that China has FAKED its infecti

( Natural News ) It is becoming clear even to corporate news outlets that something isn ’ t quite right with communist China ’ s reporting about the state of novel coronavirus .
The official claim is that there are only about 60,000 confirmed cases of the disease worldwide , even though far more people appear to be falling ill and dying , according to people on the ground there who are observing the situation as it unfolds .
Mainstream media sources like The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal , and The Washington Post are all now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the epicenter of the outbreak , are having to turn away thousands of sick patients because they simply don ’ t have enough beds or staff to care for everyone .
Even with the emergency construction of at least two new hospital compounds in Wuhan alone , the battle is being lost , independent journalists continue to warn .
And now non-independent journalists are finally admitting the very same thing as they struggle to reconcile the official numbers with what their own eyes are telling them .
The Wall Street Journal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earliest mainstream media outlets to question the numbers coming out of China , says that testing for coronavirus is apparently flawed because many people who are testing negative still show obvious signs of pneumonia .
But because of their negative diagnosis , such folks are being turned away from receiving care and left to die .
“ This arbitrary classification , undoubtedly adopted by some foolish and shortsighted bureaucrat , caused many to suffer as hospitals refused thousands of patients with serious symptoms , ” reports Zero Hedge .
“ Some may have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the government and their terrified neighbors.
” Be sure to listen below as Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , talks about how the number of coronavirus infections recently jumped by 33 percent in just one day : Researchers say only one in 19 infected people is being tested for coronavirus What appears to now be happening is that hospitals throughout China are only concerned with admitting patients who have confirmed coronavirus and who demonstrate the severest of symptoms .
Everyone else , including patients with the same severe symptoms but no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away .
Researchers from Imperial College London estimate that only one out of every 19 people who actually has novel coronavirus is being tested for it , meaning most infected patients are currently flying under the radar .
This would suggest that there are at least one million people in Wuhan alone with novel coronavirus , a figure massively higher than the 60,000 or so being officially reported .
This is highly problematic , especially in patients with mild symptoms , because they ’ re probably being overlooked as they continue to quietly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ The terrifying possibility that the already overwhelmed Chinese healthcare system is missing a huge number of patients with probably mostly mild symptoms is especially worrying since the virus appears to have the ability to spread ‘ silently ’ – i.e .
before the infected start displaying symptoms , ” Zero Hedge warns .
“ Many doctors at Chinese hospitals are petitioning the regime to use chest scans to diagnose patients instead of swab tests , which have been found to be extremely unreliable.
” Time will tell how this whole situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being told not to worry , but the evidence speaks for itself and it is saying , you ’ d better at least prepare for a worst-case scenario , even if it doesn ’ t pan out , otherwise you could be sorry .
For more up-to-the-minute news about Wuhan coronavirus , be sure to check out Pandemic.news .
You can also explore the many other Health Ranger Report coronavirus podcasts featuring Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , by visiting Brighteon.com .

Mainstream media beginning to catch up to Natural News in reporting that China has FAKED its infection numbers for weeks
It is becoming clear even to corporate news outlets that something isn't quite right with communist China's reporting about the state of novel coronavirus. The official claim is that there are only about 60,000 confirmed cases of the disease worldwide, even though far more people appear to be falling ill and dying, according to people on the ground there who are observing the situation as it unfolds.
Mainstream media sources like The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post are all now reporting the fact that hospitals in Wuhan, the epicenter of the outbreak, are having to turn away thousands of sick patients because they simply don't have enough beds or staff to care for everyone.
Even with the emergency construction of at least two new hospital compounds in Wuhan alone, the battle is being lost, independent journalists continue to warn. And now non-independent journalists are finally admitting the very same thing as they struggle to reconcile the official numbers with what their own eyes are telling them.
The Wall Street Journal, for instance, which was among the earliest mainstream media outlets to question the numbers coming out of China, says that testing for coronavirus is apparently flawed because many people who are testing negative still show obvious signs of pneumonia. But because of their negative diagnosis, such folks are being turned away from receiving care and left to die.
"This arbitrary classification, undoubtedly adopted by some foolish and shortsighted bureaucrat, caused many to suffer as hospitals refused thousands of patients with serious symptoms," reports Zero Hedge. "Some may have even died in their homes, unbeknownst to the government and their terrified neighbors."
Be sure to listen below as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about how the number of coronavirus infections recently jumped by 33 percent in just one day:
Researchers say only one in 19 infected people is being tested for coronavirus
What appears to now be happening is that hospitals throughout China are only concerned with admitting patients who have confirmed coronavirus and who demonstrate the severest of symptoms. Everyone else, including patients with the same severe symptoms but no official coronavirus diagnosis, is being turned away.
Researchers from Imperial College London estimate that only one out of every 19 people who actually has novel coronavirus is being tested for it, meaning most infected patients are currently flying under the radar. This would suggest that there are at least one million people in Wuhan alone with novel coronavirus, a figure massively higher than the 60,000 or so being officially reported.
This is highly problematic, especially in patients with mild symptoms, because they're probably being overlooked as they continue to quietly spread the virus to others without detection.
"The terrifying possibility that the already overwhelmed Chinese healthcare system is missing a huge number of patients with probably mostly mild symptoms is especially worrying since the virus appears to have the ability to spread 'silently' – i.e. before the infected start displaying symptoms," Zero Hedge warns.
"Many doctors at Chinese hospitals are petitioning the regime to use chest scans to diagnose patients instead of swab tests, which have been found to be extremely unreliable."
Time will tell how this whole situation pans out. We're all being told not to worry, but the evidence speaks for itself and it is saying, you'd better at least prepare for a worst-case scenario, even if it doesn't pan out, otherwise you could be sorry.
For more up-to-the-minute news about Wuhan coronavirus, be sure to check out Pandemic.news.
You can also explore the many other Health Ranger Report coronavirus podcasts featuring Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, by visiting Brighteon.com.
Sources for this article include:
ZeroHedge.com
NaturalNews.com
WSJ.com
Brighteon.com


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Lead juror in Roger Stone case found to be biased former Dem congressional candidate; should trigger

( Natural News ) Just when you thought that things could not go more wrong for longtime GOP operative Roger Stone , an ally of President Trump , it gets worse .
Earlier this week Stone supporters were stunned — as were top officials in the Justice Department — when the four prosecutors handling the case recommended an outlandish sentence of between 7 and 9 years .
The outsized recommendation led the Justice Department , at the direction of Attorney General William Barr , to intervene and recommend a much lower , more appropriate sentence in Stone ’ s case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Judge Amy Berman Jackson , an Obama appointee .
But then , within 24 hours of that outrage new reports began to surface about the extremely biased nature of the lead juror in the case , Tomeka Hart .
As reported by Cernovich.com and The Daily Caller , she admitted to being a Stone juror in a Facebook post in which she expressed outrage that the four prosecutors — two of which had ties to the Robert Mueller team and one of which actually worked on the Stone investigation — quit the case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stone receive up to nine years in prison for one count of lying to Congress , obstruction into the investigation of the Russian collusion hoax , and “ witness tampering ” involving a witness , Randy Credico , who laughed off the allegation .
“ I have kept my silence for months .
Initially , it was for my safety .
Then , I decided to remain silent out of fear of politicizing the matter , ” Hart wrote on Facebook , adding “ But I can ’ t keep quiet any longer.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that CNN initially reported on Hart ’ s post , but of course failed to mention she was a Democrat , let alone a Democratic congressional candidate in Tennessee in 2012 .
But it gets worse .
Upon further investigation , Hart had made several anti-Trump comments on social media , in particular Twitter , and was actually posting actively during the trial .
That discovery alone raises legitimate questions about how she answered specific questions on the juror questionnaire regarding the investigation into Stone , the Mueller probe , and running for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Daily Caller investigative journalist Chuck Ross noted that Hart told lawyers during the pretrial questioning of jurors she was generally aware of developments in the ‘ Russia ’ investigation but that she did not “ pay that close attention ” to it .
Also , she insisted that Stone ’ s association with Trump would “ absolutely not ” taint her views of the defendant .
However , in one Twitter post , she directed a ‘ question ’ to the # KlanPresident , meaning Trump .
In another , the African-American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporters were racist .
“ Then stop being racists .
Co-signing and defending a racist and his racist rhetoric makes you racist .
Point blank , ” she wrote on Aug. 2 , 2019 .
Her remarks and obvious bias make for conditions that demand a new trial for Stone , according to Fox News legal analyst and former state judge Andrew Napolitano .
The Fox News senior judicial analyst has known Stone for over four decades but said that has no bearing on the fact that the long-time Trump ally is “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in light of an “ inherent bias ” from a jury member .
“ He is absolutely entitled to a new trial with a member of the jury making these types of revelations about the politics involved in the decisions to prosecute him , ” Napolitano told “ Fox & Friends ” Thursday , adding that , as a New Jersey Superior Court judge , he presided over 150 such trials .
“ It is the duty of the judge to ensure that both the government and the defendant get a fair trial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there was a built-in inherent bias on the part of a member of a jury against the defendant , that is an automatic trigger for a new trial , ” he said .

Lead juror in Roger Stone case found to be biased former Dem congressional candidate; should trigger an immediate MISTRIAL
Just when you thought that things could not go more wrong for longtime GOP operative Roger Stone, an ally of President Trump, it gets worse.
Earlier this week Stone supporters were stunned — as were top officials in the Justice Department — when the four prosecutors handling the case recommended an outlandish sentence of between 7 and 9 years.
The outsized recommendation led the Justice Department, at the direction of Attorney General William Barr, to intervene and recommend a much lower, more appropriate sentence in Stone’s case, which was heard by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee.
But then, within 24 hours of that outrage new reports began to surface about the extremely biased nature of the lead juror in the case, Tomeka Hart.
As reported by Cernovich.com and The Daily Caller, she admitted to being a Stone juror in a Facebook post in which she expressed outrage that the four prosecutors — two of which had ties to the Robert Mueller team and one of which actually worked on the Stone investigation — quit the case.
Mind you, they recommended that Stone receive up to nine years in prison for one count of lying to Congress, obstruction into the investigation of the Russian collusion hoax, and “witness tampering” involving a witness, Randy Credico, who laughed off the allegation.
“I have kept my silence for months. Initially, it was for my safety. Then, I decided to remain silent out of fear of politicizing the matter," Hart wrote on Facebook, adding "But I can't keep quiet any longer.”
It’s important to note that CNN initially reported on Hart’s post, but of course failed to mention she was a Democrat, let alone a Democratic congressional candidate in Tennessee in 2012.
But it gets worse. Upon further investigation, Hart had made several anti-Trump comments on social media, in particular Twitter, and was actually posting actively during the trial. That discovery alone raises legitimate questions about how she answered specific questions on the juror questionnaire regarding the investigation into Stone, the Mueller probe, and running for public office.
‘Absolutely entitled to a new trial’
In a separate story, Daily Caller investigative journalist Chuck Ross noted that Hart told lawyers during the pretrial questioning of jurors she was generally aware of developments in the ‘Russia’ investigation but that she did not “pay that close attention” to it. Also, she insisted that Stone’s association with Trump would “absolutely not” taint her views of the defendant.
However, in one Twitter post, she directed a ‘question’ to the #KlanPresident, meaning Trump. In another, the African-American Hart claimed that all Trump’s supporters were racist. “Then stop being racists. Co-signing and defending a racist and his racist rhetoric makes you racist. Point blank,” she wrote on Aug. 2, 2019.
Her remarks and obvious bias make for conditions that demand a new trial for Stone, according to Fox News legal analyst and former state judge Andrew Napolitano.
According to BizPac Review:
The Fox News senior judicial analyst has known Stone for over four decades but said that has no bearing on the fact that the long-time Trump ally is “absolutely entitled” to a new trial in light of an “inherent bias” from a jury member.
“He is absolutely entitled to a new trial with a member of the jury making these types of revelations about the politics involved in the decisions to prosecute him,” Napolitano told “Fox & Friends” Thursday, adding that, as a New Jersey Superior Court judge, he presided over 150 such trials.
“It is the duty of the judge to ensure that both the government and the defendant get a fair trial and if the judge discovers afterwards that there was a built-in inherent bias on the part of a member of a jury against the defendant, that is an automatic trigger for a new trial,” he said.
Sources include:
BizPacReview.com
DailyCaller.com
TheNationalSentinel.com


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Newsguard is a front for Big Pharma that suppresses all pharma-truth news sites

( Natural News ) As you may recall , Microsoft introduced a web browser plugin about a year ago called NewsGuard that supposedly helps to filter out “ fake news ” from people ’ s online search results .
But it turns out that NewsGuard is just another deep state scheme aimed at censoring all real news , and it ’ s being funded in large part by the pharmaceutical industry .
A bulk of NewsGuard ’ s original startup funding came from a global communications entity known as the Publicis Groupe that just so happens to run a health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Publicis Health ’ s clients are pharmaceutical corporations like Abbot , Amgen , Astra Zeneca , Bayer , Biogen , Celgene , Genentech , Gilead , Roche , and Sanofi – a who ’ s who of the biggest names in Big Pharma .
GlaxoSmithKline ( GSK ) is also connected to Publicis Health , having tasked the group with developing a customized media business platform called “ platformGSK.
” Back in October 2018 , following a five-month review , GSK awarded its $ 1.5 billion media account to Publicis Health , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ digital paid media strategy and planning ( for GSK ) in the Americas , Europe , Middle East , Africa and Asia-Pacific.
” This is significant because Google ’ s search engine platform is now actively censoring all sorts of natural health content , and instead directing its users to propaganda pages that appear to be news , but that are actually paid advertisements funded by , you guessed it : Big Pharma .
WebMD , for instance , is now one of the top search results that shows up in a Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And just like NewsGuard , WebMD is owned by a large conglomerate corporation called KKR & Co. that pushes things like junk food and tobacco on the masses .
As it turns out , KKR & Co. also owns Medscape and MedicineNet , two other prominent pharma-backed websites that also show up at the top of the query list when searching Google for various illnesses and ways to treat these illnesses .
It ’ s all a racket , in other words , that ’ s designed to lure internet users back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with NewsGuard added to the mix , Big Pharma is leveraging even more control over what people access and read online .
Keep in mind that as far back as 2010 , WebMD was caught putting up fake “ screening tests ” for conditions like depression , the results of which always point people towards antidepressant pharmaceuticals as the solution .
It ’ s all a scam – the actual fake news that NewsGuard purports to block – and yet NewsGuard is categorizing all of the Big Pharma propaganda as “ true , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Just last month , GSK handed over its former Pfizer Consumer Healthcare brands to Publicis Getting back to Publicis , in January it was the recipient of even more business from GSK , which reportedly handed over its former Pfizer Consumer Healthcare brands to Publicis .
These included the popular Advil painkiller brand , as well as Centrum and Caltrate dietary supplements .
The entire package , for which GSK holds a 68 percent stake in this joint venture , is estimated to be worth about $ 400 million .
Publicis has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including that of Novartis .
Back in August , Publicis developed a media platform for Novartis called “ NovartisONE2 ” which , like platformGSK , is designed to push pharmaceuticals as the solution to every woe while steering internet users away from safer natural alternatives .
NovartisONE2 is said to be worth about $ 600 million .
At the same time that Publicis was forming these lucrative relationships with GSK and Novartis , it was also investing alongside a pool of other investors into the development of NewsGuard .
As of March @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , said to be the “ media entrepreneurs ” behind NewsGuard , had reportedly raised a whopping $ 6 million to launch the company , the stated purpose of which is to : “ … address the fake news crisis by hiring dozens of trained journalists and analysts to review the 7,500 news and information websites most accessed and shared in the United States … These sites account for 98 % of the news articles read and shared in the English language online in the United States.
” In other words , NewsGuard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people read online as news , filtering out anything that contradicts the official narratives that our corrupt , fascist government deems as “ truth.
” This includes filtering out independent news and other unbiased information about the dangers of pharmaceuticals and vaccines , as well as the benefits of their natural counterparts .
Because Big Pharma is financially threatened by natural herbs , nutritional diets , and other non-pharma remedies for disease , such information has to be stamped out of existence .
This is why NewsGuard exists : to eliminate all truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ false.
” “ … NewsGuard is setting itself up as the self-appointed global arbiter of what information is ‘ trustworthy ’ – based on nine , self-described ‘ credibility and transparency factors – not only for information view for pay on private electronic devices , but also for information accessible for free in public libraries and schools , ” warns Dr. Joseph Mercola , whose own work , like that of us here at Natural News , is being actively censored not only by Google but also by NewsGuard .
“ Librarians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how to install the NewsGuard extension on their personal computers , tablets and cell phones , ” he adds .
“ If you install the plugin on your computer or cellphone , it will display its rating next to Google , Bing and other web searches as well as on articles displayed on social media.
” The good news is that nobody has to install NewsGuard , and there are signs that the service will actually become for pay rather than free .
The bad news is that Google is still acting as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state , which means internet users will have to use alternatives such as DuckDuckGo if they want to access information about health other than what ’ s being offered by the likes of WebMD , Medscape , and MedicineNet .
To learn more about how Big Pharma and Big Tech are colluding to keep you in the dark about how to truly get and stay healthy , be sure to check out Censorship.news .

Newsguard is a front for Big Pharma that suppresses all pharma-truth news sites
As you may recall, Microsoft introduced a web browser plugin about a year ago called NewsGuard that supposedly helps to filter out "fake news" from people's online search results. But it turns out that NewsGuard is just another deep state scheme aimed at censoring allnews, and it's being funded in large part by the pharmaceutical industry.
A bulk of NewsGuard's original startup funding came from a global communications entity known as the Publicis Groupe that just so happens to run a health subsidiary called Publicis Health. Named among Publicis Health's clients are pharmaceutical corporations like Abbot, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Roche, and Sanofi – a who's who of the biggest names in Big Pharma.
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is also connected to Publicis Health, having tasked the group with developing a customized media business platform called "platformGSK." Back in October 2018, following a five-month review, GSK awarded its $1.5 billion media account to Publicis Health, which it now handles "all offline and digital paid media strategy and planning (for GSK) in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific."
This is significant because Google's search engine platform is now actively censoring all sorts of natural health content, and instead directing its users to propaganda pages that appear to be news, but that are actually paid advertisements funded by, you guessed it: Big Pharma.
WebMD, for instance, is now one of the top search results that shows up in a Google search for pretty much any health-related topic. And just like NewsGuard, WebMD is owned by a large conglomerate corporation called KKR & Co. that pushes things like junk food and tobacco on the masses.
As it turns out, KKR & Co. also owns Medscape and MedicineNet, two other prominent pharma-backed websites that also show up at the top of the query list when searching Google for various illnesses and ways to treat these illnesses. It's all a racket, in other words, that's designed to lure internet users back into the pharma fold – and now with NewsGuard added to the mix, Big Pharma is leveraging even more control over what people access and read online.
Keep in mind that as far back as 2010, WebMD was caught putting up fake "screening tests" for conditions like depression, the results of which always point people towards antidepressant pharmaceuticals as the solution. It's all a scam – the actual fake news that NewsGuard purports to block – and yet NewsGuard is categorizing all of the Big Pharma propaganda as "true," and everything else as "false."
Just last month, GSK handed over its former Pfizer Consumer Healthcare brands to Publicis
Getting back to Publicis, in January it was the recipient of even more business from GSK, which reportedly handed over its former Pfizer Consumer Healthcare brands to Publicis. These included the popular Advil painkiller brand, as well as Centrum and Caltrate dietary supplements. The entire package, for which GSK holds a 68 percent stake in this joint venture, is estimated to be worth about $400 million.
Publicis has also absorbed other Big Pharma media accounts, including that of Novartis. Back in August, Publicis developed a media platform for Novartis called "NovartisONE2" which, like platformGSK, is designed to push pharmaceuticals as the solution to every woe while steering internet users away from safer natural alternatives. NovartisONE2 is said to be worth about $600 million.
At the same time that Publicis was forming these lucrative relationships with GSK and Novartis, it was also investing alongside a pool of other investors into the development of NewsGuard. As of March 2018, Steven Brill and Gordon Crovitz, said to be the "media entrepreneurs" behind NewsGuard, had reportedly raised a whopping $6 million to launch the company, the stated purpose of which is to:
"... address the fake news crisis by hiring dozens of trained journalists and analysts to review the 7,500 news and information websites most accessed and shared in the United States ... These sites account for 98% of the news articles read and shared in the English language online in the United States."
In other words, NewsGuard aims to police the bulk of what people read online as news, filtering out anything that contradicts the official narratives that our corrupt, fascist government deems as "truth." This includes filtering out independent news and other unbiased information about the dangers of pharmaceuticals and vaccines, as well as the benefits of their natural counterparts.
Because Big Pharma is financially threatened by natural herbs, nutritional diets, and other non-pharma remedies for disease, such information has to be stamped out of existence. This is why NewsGuard exists: to eliminate all truth from the internet by classifying it as "false."
"... NewsGuard is setting itself up as the self-appointed global arbiter of what information is 'trustworthy' – based on nine, self-described 'credibility and transparency factors – not only for information view for pay on private electronic devices, but also for information accessible for free in public libraries and schools," warns Dr. Joseph Mercola, whose own work, like that of us here at Natural News, is being actively censored not only by Google but also by NewsGuard.
"Librarians will even provide instructions to patrons on how to install the NewsGuard extension on their personal computers, tablets and cell phones," he adds. "If you install the plugin on your computer or cellphone, it will display its rating next to Google, Bing and other web searches as well as on articles displayed on social media."
The good news is that nobody has to install NewsGuard, and there are signs that the service will actually become for pay rather than free. The bad news is that Google is still acting as the censorship arm of the globalist deep state, which means internet users will have to use alternatives such as DuckDuckGo if they want to access information about health other than what's being offered by the likes of WebMD, Medscape, and MedicineNet.
To learn more about how Big Pharma and Big Tech are colluding to keep you in the dark about how to truly get and stay healthy, be sure to check out Censorship.news.
Sources for this article include:
NaturalNews.com
ZeroHedge.com
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Dawn of the cockroach "superbugs": Roaches are becoming cross-resistant to various insecticides, war

Dawn of the cockroach "superbugs": Roaches are becoming cross-resistant to various insecticides, warn researchers

( Natural News ) Even the most hardened , nature-loving , tree-hugging , environmentally conscious animal lover would draw the line at allowing cockroaches to roam free in their home .
Quite frankly , cockroaches are super gross , and anybody who detects them in their environment would be quick to call out the exterminator to get rid of them .
But there ’ s a problem : German and American cockroaches are the two species most commonly found in U.S. homes , and a recent study published in the journal Scientific Reports has found that German cockroaches have evolved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virtually impossible to kill .
( Related : The essential oils of ginger repel cockroaches naturally . )
Cockroaches : The nastiest of all creepy crawly home invaders Cockroaches are not just nasty looking ; they also pose some serious health risks , as explained by the University of Florida : The German cockroach is the cockroach of concern , the species that gives all other cockroaches a bad name .
… German cockroaches adulterate food or food products with their feces and defensive secretions , physically transport and often harbor pathogenic organisms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and in extremely heavy infestations have been reported to bite humans and feed on food residues on the faces of sleeping humans .
In addition , some scientists suggest that German cockroach infestations may cause human psychological stress and that the stigma associated with infestations alters human behavior .
For example , people with infested houses do less entertaining , and avoid the kitchen at night for fear of encountering a cockroach .
Clearly , unstoppable hordes of German cockroaches marching across the United States would pose massive problems .
( Related : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cockroaches in meals to patients … U.S. medical care continues plunging toward Third World status . )
For their study , the researchers tested the effects of three different insecticides , in various combinations , and in multiple apartment buildings , over a six-month period .
They exposed one group of roaches to a single insecticide .
A second roach population received two insecticides from different classes .
And a third was dosed with rotations of three insecticides — one per month , for two three-month cycles .
The scientists also tracked roaches @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , trapping live roaches to take back to the lab in greased baby food jars baited with beer-soaked bread .
The scientists found that in most cases , irrespective of the type of insecticide used , the numbers of cockroaches either remained stable or even increased .
The team determined that the reason these insecticides proved to be “ mostly ineffective ” was “ cross-resistance.
” Baby cockroaches were being born already resistant to insecticides their parents had previously been exposed to , and surprisingly , were even found to demonstrate resistance to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the single pesticide proved effective in one population of roaches that did not exhibit resistance to that specific poison .
However , where the researchers tried to use that chemical on a group that were even slightly resistant , the number of cockroaches actually increased among those born to the survivors .
Since even one female cockroach can produce dozens of babies within just a few months , their numbers are quickly replenished .
This means that if no poison exists to contain them , they would very quickly grow to unmanageable proportions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ example of how human attempts to control nature are almost always doomed to failure .
In one case after the other , evidence is mounting that trying to spray toxic chemicals to contain weeds , insects or other “ invaders ” is not only harmful to humans and the environment , but ultimately , a waste of time .
Learn more about the issues facing our environment at Environ.news .

Dawn of the cockroach “superbugs”: Roaches are becoming cross-resistant to various insecticides, warn researchers
Even the most hardened, nature-loving, tree-hugging, environmentally conscious animal lover would draw the line at allowing cockroaches to roam free in their home. Quite frankly, cockroaches are super gross, and anybody who detects them in their environment would be quick to call out the exterminator to get rid of them.
But there’s a problem: German and American cockroaches are the two species most commonly found in U.S. homes, and a recent study published in the journal Scientific Reports has found that German cockroaches have evolved resistance to multiple pesticides, making them virtually impossible to kill. (Related: The essential oils of ginger repel cockroaches naturally.)
Cockroaches: The nastiest of all creepy crawly home invaders
Cockroaches are not just nasty looking; they also pose some serious health risks, as explained by the University of Florida:
The German cockroach is the cockroach of concern, the species that gives all other cockroaches a bad name. …
German cockroaches adulterate food or food products with their feces and defensive secretions, physically transport and often harbor pathogenic organisms, may cause severe allergic responses, and in extremely heavy infestations have been reported to bite humans and feed on food residues on the faces of sleeping humans. In addition, some scientists suggest that German cockroach infestations may cause human psychological stress and that the stigma associated with infestations alters human behavior. For example, people with infested houses do less entertaining, and avoid the kitchen at night for fear of encountering a cockroach.
Clearly, unstoppable hordes of German cockroaches marching across the United States would pose massive problems. (Related: VA hospital found to be serving up cockroaches in meals to patients ... U.S. medical care continues plunging toward Third World status.)
What the study found
For their study, the researchers tested the effects of three different insecticides, in various combinations, and in multiple apartment buildings, over a six-month period.
Live Science explains:
They exposed one group of roaches to a single insecticide. A second roach population received two insecticides from different classes. And a third was dosed with rotations of three insecticides — one per month, for two three-month cycles.
The scientists also tracked roaches' resistance to insecticides across multiple generations, trapping live roaches to take back to the lab in greased baby food jars baited with beer-soaked bread.
The scientists found that in most cases, irrespective of the type of insecticide used, the numbers of cockroaches either remained stable or even increased. The team determined that the reason these insecticides proved to be “mostly ineffective” was “cross-resistance.”
Baby cockroaches were being born already resistant to insecticides their parents had previously been exposed to, and surprisingly, were even found to demonstrate resistance to several other classes of insecticide.
Only the single pesticide proved effective in one population of roaches that did not exhibit resistance to that specific poison. However, where the researchers tried to use that chemical on a group that were even slightly resistant, the number of cockroaches actually increased among those born to the survivors.
Since even one female cockroach can produce dozens of babies within just a few months, their numbers are quickly replenished. This means that if no poison exists to contain them, they would very quickly grow to unmanageable proportions.
Certainly, this is yet another example of how human attempts to control nature are almost always doomed to failure. In one case after the other, evidence is mounting that trying to spray toxic chemicals to contain weeds, insects or other “invaders” is not only harmful to humans and the environment, but ultimately, a waste of time.
Learn more about the issues facing our environment at Environ.news.
Sources include:
LiveScience.com
EntnemDept.UFL.edu
Purdue.edu


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Nearly 40 percent of young consumers in America SHUN commercial antiperspirants in favor of "natural

Nearly 40 percent of young consumers in America SHUN commercial antiperspirants in favor of "natural" deodorants

( Natural News ) There was a time when walking around with deodorant-free – and even unwashed – armpits was quite normal .
In fact , deodorants were a commercial failure when they were first launched in the late 1800s , with people believing that bathing regularly , avoiding exercise , staying out of the sun and covering themselves in perfume were the best ways to avoid smelly pits .
It was only after advertising campaigns that were both harsh and faintly threatening were unleashed on the American public in the early 1920s , that deodorant sales picked up – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the multi-billion-dollar market that they are today .
But the market is always changing , and recent research by the organization YouGov indicates that young people are more concerned about products being natural , authentic , organic and chemical-free than they are in smelling great .
In fact , close to half ( 40 percent ) of 18- to 24-year-olds surveyed admitted foregoing deodorant use altogether , along with 31 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds and 22 percent of 35- to 44-year-olds .
It was only in the over 45 age group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) said that they use deodorant regularly .
( Related : Aluminum salts found in popular antiperspirant products cause tumor growth . )
The obsession with hiding how we really smell took off in earnest after marketing campaigns by unscrupulous advertising executives basically shamed people into imagining that they would be unpopular unless they used deodorant .
For example , a campaign by infamous copy writer James Young warned young women that if they did not wear deodorant they would repel men , never find love and end up as spinsters .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mail , a quite condescending and threatening 1937 Mum advert warned : You ’ re a pretty girl , Mary , and you ’ re smart about most things but you ’ re just a bit stupid about yourself .
You love a good time—but you seldom have one .
Evening after evening you sit at home alone .
You ’ ve met several grand men who seemed interested at first .
They took you out once—and that was that .
There are so many pretty Marys in the world who never seem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aloneness .
In this smart modern age , it ’ s against the code for a girl ( or a man either ) to carry the repellent odor of underarm perspiration on clothing and person .
It ’ s a fault which never fails to carry its own punishment—unpopularity .
While advertising campaigns directed at women focused mainly on their romantic prospects , those aimed at men , particularly during the Great Depression years , threatened that they would never find jobs again unless they hid their natural odors by coating their armpits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your deodorant While many so-called “ experts ” would argue otherwise , several studies have linked the use of deodorants – in particular , antiperspirants – to the development of cancer .
Harmful chemicals are easily absorbed through the skin , and deodorants are jam-packed with such chemicals .
Aluminum compounds used in deodorant to prevent our pores from sweating can interfere with the body ’ s natural sex hormones .
This may cause breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men , as well as increase the risk for Alzheimer ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sweating actually serves some useful purposes , including clearing the complexion , lowering body temperature and warding off sickness .
Fortunately , a younger , smarter generation of consumers has realized that advertising is often nothing but a pack of lies , and these young people are making their own decisions about what personal care products to use , based not on slogans or threats , but on the impact of these products on their health and on the environment .
Learn more about the dangers of aluminum in deodorant at Aluminum.news .

Nearly 40 percent of young consumers in America SHUN commercial antiperspirants in favor of “natural” deodorants
There was a time when walking around with deodorant-free – and even unwashed – armpits was quite normal. In fact, deodorants were a commercial failure when they were first launched in the late 1800s, with people believing that bathing regularly, avoiding exercise, staying out of the sun and covering themselves in perfume were the best ways to avoid smelly pits.
It was only after advertising campaigns that were both harsh and faintly threatening were unleashed on the American public in the early 1920s, that deodorant sales picked up – and then boomed – until they grew into the multi-billion-dollar market that they are today.
But the market is always changing, and recent research by the organization YouGov indicates that young people are more concerned about products being natural, authentic, organic and chemical-free than they are in smelling great.
In fact, close to half (40 percent) of 18- to 24-year-olds surveyed admitted foregoing deodorant use altogether, along with 31 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds and 22 percent of 35- to 44-year-olds. It was only in the over 45 age group that the vast majority (84 percent) said that they use deodorant regularly. (Related: Aluminum salts found in popular antiperspirant products cause tumor growth.)
You’re a pretty girl, Mary, but … you smell!
The obsession with hiding how we really smell took off in earnest after marketing campaigns by unscrupulous advertising executives basically shamed people into imagining that they would be unpopular unless they used deodorant.
For example, a campaign by infamous copy writer James Young warned young women that if they did not wear deodorant they would repel men, never find love and end up as spinsters.
As reported by the U.K.’s Daily Mail, a quite condescending and threatening 1937 Mum advert warned:
You’re a pretty girl, Mary, and you’re smart about most things but you’re just a bit stupid about yourself. You love a good time—but you seldom have one. Evening after evening you sit at home alone. You’ve met several grand men who seemed interested at first. They took you out once—and that was that. There are so many pretty Marys in the world who never seem to sense the real reason for their aloneness. In this smart modern age, it’s against the code for a girl (or a man either) to carry the repellent odor of underarm perspiration on clothing and person. It’s a fault which never fails to carry its own punishment—unpopularity.
While advertising campaigns directed at women focused mainly on their romantic prospects, those aimed at men, particularly during the Great Depression years, threatened that they would never find jobs again unless they hid their natural odors by coating their armpits in deodorant.
The chemicals lurking in your deodorant
While many so-called “experts” would argue otherwise, several studies have linked the use of deodorants – in particular, antiperspirants – to the development of cancer.
Harmful chemicals are easily absorbed through the skin, and deodorants are jam-packed with such chemicals.
Natural News previously reported:
Aluminum compounds used in deodorant to prevent our pores from sweating can interfere with the body's natural sex hormones. This may cause breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men, as well as increase the risk for Alzheimer's disease in both sexes.
And sweating actually serves some useful purposes, including clearing the complexion, lowering body temperature and warding off sickness.
Fortunately, a younger, smarter generation of consumers has realized that advertising is often nothing but a pack of lies, and these young people are making their own decisions about what personal care products to use, based not on slogans or threats, but on the impact of these products on their health and on the environment.
Learn more about the dangers of aluminum in deodorant at Aluminum.news.
Sources include:
DailyMail.co.uk
Today.YouGov.com
SmithsonianMag.com
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Beagles can "sniff out" lung cancer more accurately than "advanced technology"

( Natural News ) Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States .
There are several types of lung cancer , but non-small cell ( NSCLC ) is the most common form .
Since NSCLC is so deadly , early detection is vital if a patient is to survive .
However , the usual methods of detecting the disease – PET and CT scans – are both expensive and unreliable .
In recent years , researchers have been focusing a great deal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ methods .
Some of this research has focused on whether dogs , with their highly advanced sense of smell , have the ability to detect lung and other types of cancer in humans .
Now , a study published in the Journal of the American Osteopathic Association has found that beagles can be trained to detect NSCLC in human blood samples with greater than 96 percent accuracy .
As explained by Medical News Today , beagles — hunting dogs which were specifically bred to find and track small animals — have 45 times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this reason , the research team decided to use beagles in their experiment .
The researchers initially trained four beagles for 8 weeks , though one showed little interest in the assigned task so did not take part in the study .
After the training period , the team called upon the three beagles to correctly distinguish between blood samples collected from individuals with non-small cell lung cancer and a set of blood samples obtained from healthy individuals .
The researchers placed all the samples in one room , at a height at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The team had trained the beagles to sit down when they could smell cancer , or to move on if the sample was from a healthy person .
The results ?
The dogs were consistently able to distinguish between the two sample types , and were able to identify cancer in the samples with greater than 96 percent sensitivity and specificity .
The researchers are excited at the results of their research and have undertaken further studies to determine whether the dogs can identify other forms of the disease , including both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study will examine whether the beagles can detect cancer through patient breath samples alone , and the researchers say that thus far the results seem very promising .
The research team ’ s ultimate goal is to create a cheap , over-the-counter test which people can use to test themselves for cancer simply by breathing on it .
( Related : Late stage lung cancer more prevalent among the middle-aged than the elderly , study finds . )
Prevention even better than detection While early detection of cancer certainly provides the best chance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ survive it , lung cancer , like many other types of cancer , can be prevented in many cases through some simple lifestyle changes .
The American Cancer Society advises the following : • Test your home for the presence of radon , and if it is detected , take the necessary steps to eradicate it .
• Avoid exposure to cancer-causing agents like asbestos , diesel exhaust , arsenic , silica and coal products .
• Eat a healthy diet , centered around organic fruits and vegetables , while minimizing consumption of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ animals which have been given routine antibiotics and hormone treatments .
In addition , studies have found that regular exercise can reduce lung cancer risk by a whopping 45 percent in former smokers .
Learn more about preventing cancer at AntiCancer.news .

Beagles can “sniff out” lung cancer more accurately than “advanced technology”
Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States. There are several types of lung cancer, but non-small cell (NSCLC) is the most common form
Since NSCLC is so deadly, early detection is vital if a patient is to survive. However, the usual methods of detecting the disease – PET and CT scans – are both expensive and unreliable.
In recent years, researchers have been focusing a great deal of attention on finding alternative cancer detection methods. Some of this research has focused on whether dogs, with their highly advanced sense of smell, have the ability to detect lung and other types of cancer in humans.
Now, a study published in the Journal of the American Osteopathic Association has found that beagles can be trained to detect NSCLC in human blood samples with greater than 96 percent accuracy.
Harnessing the incredible olfactory capabilities of dogs
As explained by Medical News Today, beagles -- hunting dogs which were specifically bred to find and track small animals -- have 45 times more olfactory receptors than humans. For this reason, the research team decided to use beagles in their experiment.
Medical News Today explained:
The researchers initially trained four beagles for 8 weeks, though one showed little interest in the assigned task so did not take part in the study.
After the training period, the team called upon the three beagles to correctly distinguish between blood samples collected from individuals with non-small cell lung cancer and a set of blood samples obtained from healthy individuals.
The researchers placed all the samples in one room, at a height at which the dogs could comfortably sniff them. The team had trained the beagles to sit down when they could smell cancer, or to move on if the sample was from a healthy person.
The results? The dogs were consistently able to distinguish between the two sample types, and were able to identify cancer in the samples with greater than 96 percent sensitivity and specificity.
The researchers are excited at the results of their research and have undertaken further studies to determine whether the dogs can identify other forms of the disease, including both colorectal and breast cancers.
The latest study will examine whether the beagles can detect cancer through patient breath samples alone, and the researchers say that thus far the results seem very promising.
The research team’s ultimate goal is to create a cheap, over-the-counter test which people can use to test themselves for cancer simply by breathing on it. (Related: Late stage lung cancer more prevalent among the middle-aged than the elderly, study finds.)
Prevention even better than detection
While early detection of cancer certainly provides the best chance for patients who have the disease to survive it, lung cancer, like many other types of cancer, can be prevented in many cases through some simple lifestyle changes.
The American Cancer Society advises the following:
Don’t smoke.
Avoid breathing in other people’s secondhand smoke.
Test your home for the presence of radon, and if it is detected, take the necessary steps to eradicate it.
Avoid exposure to cancer-causing agents like asbestos, diesel exhaust, arsenic, silica and coal products.
Eat a healthy diet, centered around organic fruits and vegetables, while minimizing consumption of sugar, refined carbohydrates and meat from animals which have been given routine antibiotics and hormone treatments.
In addition, studies have found that regular exercise can reduce lung cancer risk by a whopping 45 percent in former smokers.
Learn more about preventing cancer at AntiCancer.news.
Sources for this article include:
MedicalNewsToday.com
Cancer.net
JAOA.org
Cancer.org
Cancer.org


naturalnews--2020-02-14--Bon voyage! Study suggests taking vacations helps boost heart health

( Natural News ) Statistics indicate that around a quarter of all adults have a condition known as metabolic syndrome , a cluster of risk factors associated with an elevated risk of Type 2 diabetes , cardiovascular disease and stroke .
The risk of metabolic syndrome increases with age , and lifestyle issues like not exercising enough , smoking and carrying extra weight also elevate risk .
Making the right lifestyle changes – including exercising regularly , cutting out refined carbohydrates and sugar , maintaining a healthy weight , and not smoking – can dramatically reduce the risk of metabolic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious health problems .
And a new study conducted by researchers from Syracuse University , led by Professor Bryce Hruska of the Falk College Department of Public Health , has confirmed another really fun way to reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome : taking a holiday !
( Related : Naturally preventable metabolic syndrome may cause breast cancer . )
Those who vacation the most have the lowest risk As reported by the U.K. ’ s Daily Mail , the study confirmed what most of us already know : Nothing beats a good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overall feeling of well-being .
And the link between vacationing and a reduction in metabolic syndrome is clear : The more annual vacations study participants took , the lower their risk was found to be of metabolic syndrome .
( Related : Common sleep complaints predict metabolic syndrome . )
“ What we found is people who vacation more frequently in the past 12 months have a lowered risk for metabolic syndrome and metabolic symptoms , ” Dr. Hruska explained .
“ Metabolic syndrome is a collection of risk factors for cardiovascular disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease , ” he added .
“ This is important because we are actually seeing a reduction in the risk for cardiovascular disease the more vacationing a person does .
Because metabolic symptoms are modifiable , it means they can change or be eliminated.
” For their study , the researchers analysed data from 63 workers who were eligible for paid holidays .
Blood samples and waist circumference measurements were taken , and metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in participants who exhibited three or more of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than 35 inches ( 88cm ) in females or 40 inches ( 101cm ) in males ; • “ Good ” cholesterol levels lower than 50mg/dL in females or 40mg/dL in males ; • Fasting blood glucose levels of at least 100mg/dL .
In addition , the participants were interviewed about the vacations they had taken the previous year .
On average , the participants had enjoyed five vacations and used two weeks of vacation time over the past year .
The findings were clear : Those who took the most holidays had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Surprisingly , while over 80 percent of American workers are entitled to annual vacation time , fewer than 50 percent actually take time off and go on vacation .
The researchers emphasize that simply making use of a benefit that is already available to workers could translate into big health benefits .
If possible , it is better to take several shorter breaks than to only take one long vacation , because the study found that with each individual vacation taken the risk of metabolic syndrome reduced by a hefty 25 percent !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ knowing that a good vacation provides even more health benefits than we already knew about provides yet another incentive to take the break we ’ ve probably already been dreaming about .
Discover more tips on living your best life ever at Longevity.news .

Bon voyage! Study suggests taking vacations helps boost heart health
Statistics indicate that around a quarter of all adults have a condition known as metabolic syndrome , a cluster of risk factors associated with an elevated risk of Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and stroke. The risk of metabolic syndrome increases with age, and lifestyle issues like not exercising enough, smoking and carrying extra weight also elevate risk.
Making the right lifestyle changes – including exercising regularly, cutting out refined carbohydrates and sugar, maintaining a healthy weight, and not smoking – can dramatically reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome, and therefore a host of serious health problems.
And a new study conducted by researchers from Syracuse University, led by Professor Bryce Hruska of the Falk College Department of Public Health, has confirmed another really fun way to reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome: taking a holiday! (Related: Naturally preventable metabolic syndrome may cause breast cancer.)
Those who vacation the most have the lowest risk
As reported by the U.K.’s Daily Mail, the study confirmed what most of us already know: Nothing beats a good holiday for reducing stress and improving our overall feeling of well-being.
And the link between vacationing and a reduction in metabolic syndrome is clear: The more annual vacations study participants took, the lower their risk was found to be of metabolic syndrome. (Related: Common sleep complaints predict metabolic syndrome.)
“What we found is people who vacation more frequently in the past 12 months have a lowered risk for metabolic syndrome and metabolic symptoms,” Dr. Hruska explained. “Metabolic syndrome is a collection of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. If you have more of them you are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease,” he added. “This is important because we are actually seeing a reduction in the risk for cardiovascular disease the more vacationing a person does. Because metabolic symptoms are modifiable, it means they can change or be eliminated.”
For their study, the researchers analysed data from 63 workers who were eligible for paid holidays. Blood samples and waist circumference measurements were taken, and metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in participants who exhibited three or more of the following:
A waist circumference greater than 35 inches (88cm) in females or 40 inches (101cm) in males;
Blood pressure readings greater than 130/85mmHg;
Blood triglyceride levels exceeding 150mg/dL;
“Good” cholesterol levels lower than 50mg/dL in females or 40mg/dL in males;
Fasting blood glucose levels of at least 100mg/dL.
In addition, the participants were interviewed about the vacations they had taken the previous year. On average, the participants had enjoyed five vacations and used two weeks of vacation time over the past year. The findings were clear: Those who took the most holidays had the lowest risk of metabolic syndrome.
Surprisingly, while over 80 percent of American workers are entitled to annual vacation time, fewer than 50 percent actually take time off and go on vacation. The researchers emphasize that simply making use of a benefit that is already available to workers could translate into big health benefits.
If possible, it is better to take several shorter breaks than to only take one long vacation, because the study found that with each individual vacation taken the risk of metabolic syndrome reduced by a hefty 25 percent!
And let’s face it, knowing that a good vacation provides even more health benefits than we already knew about provides yet another incentive to take the break we’ve probably already been dreaming about.
Discover more tips on living your best life ever at Longevity.news.
Sources for this article include:
DailyMail.co.uk
ScienceDaily.com
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov


naturalnews--2020-02-16--Could the coronavirus pandemic drastically alter the 2020 election? Democrat cities are the most lik

( Natural News ) You read it here first : The coronavirus pandemic will spark multiple outbreaks across the United States before the November election , and there ’ s a good chance it will drastically alter the outcome of the election due to the demographics of America .
Consider the following : – The coronavirus spreads more easily in high-density population centers .
This means cities will be the hardest hit .
And most cities are filled with left-leaning Democrats , while conservatives tend to live outside the cities , in more suburban or rural areas .
– The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surfaces , and left-leaning cities rely on public transportation such as subways , trains and buses which are “ shared spaces ” where coronavirus infections can easily spread .
In contrast , people who live outside cities tend to drive their own private vehicles .
– High-density cities rely on imports of food , fuel , water , electricity and supplies .
Thus , they are extremely vulnerable to sudden , severe shortages or infrastructure disruptions .
Any city that suffers an outbreak would quickly be placed under quarantine , immediately halting traditional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Expect to see sudden shortages of supplies in any city where the coronavirus is confirmed .
– On voting day , any city under quarantine will see voter participation plunge to near-zero .
How are people supposed to get out and vote if every public place presents the risk of a death sentence from a deadly virus ?
– The most likely cities to be impacted first are left-leaning cities which receive air traffic from Asia .
These include Honolulu , Los Angeles , San Francisco , Portland and Seattle .
By @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would expect to see outbreaks appearing first in these cities , then spreading eastward across other U.S. cities over time .
– The coronavirus impacts immunocompromised people more than others , and many left-leaning cities such as San Francisco are home to people whose lifestyles subject them to blood-borne pathogens that weaken immune function .
For example , anal cancer is already exploding across the homosexual communities along the West Coast ( but the media largely refuses to report on it ) .
Homosexual lifestyles can often involve multiple sex partners and involve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blood-borne diseases that suppress immune function , which is one of the contributing factors with AIDS .
AIDS , of course , stands for “ Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome , ” which perfectly describes what we ’ re describing here .
– High density cities have the worst gang violence anywhere in the nation , and once the rule of law begins to collapse , the police will be very quickly overrun , leading to unrestrained gang violence and the collapse of anything resembling a social order .
Gang activities will then further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the simple reason that gang members don ’ t wear N95 masks and don ’ t care about “ germs.
” – Human feces is already flooding the streets of San Francisco , and scientists have already confirmed the coronavirus is present in human feces .
The complete collapse of public sanitation in liberal cities will obviously become a strong contributing factor to the rapid spread of this pandemic .
Consider the homelessness , needle sharing and conditions of total filth in cities like Seattle .
– The “ sanctuary city ” status @ @ @ @ @ @ @ magnet for infected migrants fleeing nations like Mexico as the pandemic spreads there .
This will illegally cross the U.S. border and head right to the sanctuary cities where they will spread the pandemic among the very people who are protecting those illegals out of a twisted desire to virtue signal 24/7 .
On the other side of things , if the pandemic causes a large disruption of the U.S. stock market , any plunge in the markets could negatively impact President Trump ’ s chances of re-election , given how he has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever-rising bubble stock market ( which will sooner or later have to correct back to reality , even without a pandemic ) .
In summary , the virus is most likely to impact Democrats in terms of physical infections , quarantined cities and deaths , but it ’ s also quite likely to impact the U.S. stock market this year , which could seriously harm Trump ’ s chances of re-election .
Does that mean all this is a wash ?
Only the next 8 months will tell… Listen to this podcast to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the top goals of globalists , including depopulation : Follow more breaking news podcasts at the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com :

Could the coronavirus pandemic drastically alter the 2020 election? Democrat cities are the most likely outbreak hubs
You read it here first: The coronavirus pandemic will spark multiple outbreaks across the United States before the November election, and there's a good chance it will drastically alter the outcome of the election due to the demographics of America.
Consider the following:
- The coronavirus spreads more easily in high-density population centers. This means cities will be the hardest hit. And most cities are filled with left-leaning Democrats, while conservatives tend to live outside the cities, in more suburban or rural areas.
- The coronavirus survives up to 9 days on surfaces, and left-leaning cities rely on public transportation such as subways, trains and buses which are "shared spaces" where coronavirus infections can easily spread. In contrast, people who live outside cities tend to drive their own private vehicles.
- High-density cities rely on imports of food, fuel, water, electricity and supplies. Thus, they are extremely vulnerable to sudden, severe shortages or infrastructure disruptions. Any city that suffers an outbreak would quickly be placed under quarantine, immediately halting traditional deliveries of food, fuel and more. Expect to see sudden shortages of supplies in any city where the coronavirus is confirmed.
- On voting day, any city under quarantine will see voter participation plunge to near-zero. How are people supposed to get out and vote if every public place presents the risk of a death sentence from a deadly virus?
- The most likely cities to be impacted first are left-leaning cities which receive air traffic from Asia. These include Honolulu, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. By nature of the geography itself, we would expect to see outbreaks appearing first in these cities, then spreading eastward across other U.S. cities over time.
- The coronavirus impacts immunocompromised people more than others, and many left-leaning cities such as San Francisco are home to people whose lifestyles subject them to blood-borne pathogens that weaken immune function. For example, anal cancer is already exploding across the homosexual communities along the West Coast (but the media largely refuses to report on it). Homosexual lifestyles can often involve multiple sex partners and involve anal sex which causes the sharing of blood-borne diseases that suppress immune function, which is one of the contributing factors with AIDS. AIDS, of course, stands for "Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome," which perfectly describes what we're describing here.
- High density cities have the worst gang violence anywhere in the nation, and once the rule of law begins to collapse, the police will be very quickly overrun, leading to unrestrained gang violence and the collapse of anything resembling a social order. Gang activities will then further accelerate the spread of the virus for the simple reason that gang members don't wear N95 masks and don't care about "germs."
- Human feces is already flooding the streets of San Francisco, and scientists have already confirmed the coronavirus is present in human feces. The complete collapse of public sanitation in liberal cities will obviously become a strong contributing factor to the rapid spread of this pandemic. Consider the homelessness, needle sharing and conditions of total filth in cities like Seattle.
- The "sanctuary city" status of left-wing cities will serve as a magnet for infected migrants fleeing nations like Mexico as the pandemic spreads there. This will illegally cross the U.S. border and head right to the sanctuary cities where they will spread the pandemic among the very people who are protecting those illegals out of a twisted desire to virtue signal 24/7.
On the other side of things, if the pandemic causes a large disruption of the U.S. stock market, any plunge in the markets could negatively impact President Trump's chances of re-election, given how he has foolishly tied his political success to an ever-rising bubble stock market (which will sooner or later have to correct back to reality, even without a pandemic).
In summary, the virus is most likely to impact Democrats in terms of physical infections, quarantined cities and deaths, but it's also quite likely to impact the U.S. stock market this year, which could seriously harm Trump's chances of re-election.
Does that mean all this is a wash? Only the next 8 months will tell...
Listen to this podcast to understand why the coronavirus quarantine achieves all the top goals of globalists, including depopulation:
Follow more breaking news podcasts at the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com:
www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport