naturalnews--2020-02-04--Bombshell transcript: Dr. Francis Boyle's interview on coronavirus as an "offensive biological warfa

Bombshell transcript: Dr. Francis Boyle's interview on coronavirus as an "offensive biological warfare weapon"

( Natural News ) A recent interview with Dr. Francis Boyle , conducted by Geopolitics & Empire , has been exploding across the ‘ net over the past few days as the truth is emerging on the origins of the coronavirus pandemic .
It was an engineered biological weapon that escaped a BSL-4 lab in China , and now it ’ s replicating on an exponential scale , threatening the entire human race .
Francis Boyle warned the world about bioweapons research starting in the 1980s .
After speaking out about the U.S. bioweapons research efforts which were restarted after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the deep state , of course — Francis Boyle was blackballed from the entire media based on orders from the CIA .
Now , Boyle is one of the few courageous voices speaking the truth about the bioweapons origins of the coronavirus .
In this bombshell interview ( full transcript below ) , Boyle talks about : • The bioweapons origins of the coronavirus .
• How the U.S. deep state deployed anthrax on U.S. soil to whip up publicity about biological weapons and increase funding for bioweapons labs .
• Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organizations which are complicit in the covert development of biological weapons .
• The “ death science ” industry and why the U.S. government has spent over $ 100 billion developing self-replicating weapons that are deliberately designed to exterminate human life .
• Details about the Pirbright Institute and its ties to bioweapons , depopulation , vaccines and coronavirus patents .
( It ’ s partially funded by Bill & Melinda Gates . )
• Why all BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs in the world should be banned and shut down .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interviews you ’ ll hear all year .
I ’ ve added bolding emphasis on the really important parts , so if you skim this transcript , at least read the bolded sentences .
Geopolitics & Empire also has a channel on Brighteon.com , and we hope they will post more outstanding interviews there .
You can find more work from this outstanding independent journalism organization at the Geopolitics & Empire website .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: Geopolitics & Empire is joined by Dr. Francis Boyle , who is international law professor at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ll be discussing the Wuhan coronavirus and biological warfare .
He ’ s served as counsel to numerous governments such as Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Palestinian authority .
He ’ s represented numerous national international bodies in the areas of human rights , war crimes and genocide , nuclear policy , and biowarfare .
He ’ s written numerous books , one of my favorites being “ Destroying Libya and World Order ” , which I assigned as mandatory reading material for my own students when I taught at the Monterrey Institute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this interview , he ’ s written a book called “ Biowarfare and Terrorism ” , and drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the biological weapons convention , known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that was approved unanimously by both houses of the US Congress and signed into law by President Bush .
Thanks for joining us , Dr. Boyle .
Dr. Francis Boyle : Wow .
Thank you so much for having me on and thanks for that kind introduction .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: Now let ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the news recently .
This coronavirus in Wuhan .
There have been some reports recently , there ’ s a really interesting website called Great Game India that has been reporting on this .
They ’ ve been talking about China , which they say has been complying with biological weapons convention in recent years .
But then there are some people in the US and experts that have been saying that in reality , China isn ’ t complying with the weapons convention .
And I think neither , perhaps the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wondering if China is developing its own biosafety level four lab in Wuhan and elsewhere , as you know , as a type of deterrence .
Is it a type of a biological arms race that we have going on ?
You told me in an email that you suspect China was developing the coronavirus as a dual use of biowarfare weapons agent .
Also , what do you make of reports that Chinese scientists have been stealing research and viruses , including the coronavirus from a Canadian bio lab this past December @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been charged with smuggling vials of biological research to China from the US with the aid of Charles Lieber who was the chair of Harvard ’ s chemistry department .
And he also happens to be in 2011 a strategic scientist at Wuhan University .
So , can you tell us what ’ s going on with this recent outbreak in Wuhan ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : Well , that ’ s a lot of questions .
I guess we can take them one at a time , but if you just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Does China have a BSL for laboratory ?
” , Wuhan comes up right away .
It ’ s at the top of the list .
That ’ s all with the moment this type of thing happened I began to do that .
So a BSL-4 is the most serious type .
And basically BSL-4 labs , we have many of them here in the United States , are used to develop offensive biological warfare weapons with DNA genetic engineering .
So it does seem to me that the Wuhan BSL-4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ My guess is that they were researching SARS , and they weaponize it further by giving it a gain of function properties , which means it could be more lethal .
Indeed , the latest report now is it ’ s a 15 % fatality rate , which is more than SARS at 83 % infection rate .
A typical gain of function travels in the air so it could reach out maybe six feet or more from someone emitting a sneeze or a cough .
Likewise , this is a specially designated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in on it and they knew full well what was going on there .
Yes .
It ’ s also been reported that Chinese scientists stole coronavirus materials from the Canadian lab at Winnipeg .
Winnipeg is Canada ’ s formal center for research , developing , testing , biological warfare weapons .
It ’ s along the lines of Fort Detrick here in the United States of America .
I have three degrees from Harvard .
It would not surprise me if something was being stolen out of Harvard to turn over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I don ’ t know what was in those vials one way or the other .
But the bottom line is I drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention that was approved unanimously by both Houses in the United States Congress signed into law by President Bush Sr. that it appears the coronavirus that we ’ re dealing with here is an offensive biological warfare weapon that leaped out of Wuhan BSL-4 .
I ’ m not saying it was done deliberately .
But there had been previous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things leaking out of it .
I ’ m afraid that is what we are dealing with today .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: We ’ ll be talking about the Wuhan and the coronavirus and China , but can you give us kind of like a bigger context .
I know you ’ ve , previously , in interviews said that since 9/11 , you think that the US has spent $ 100 billion on biological warfare research .
We know the Soviet Union , if I ’ m not mistaken , developed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ve also mentioned that UK , France , Israel and China are all involved in biological warfare weapons research .
And something interesting , I believe one or two years ago a Bulgarian journalist and the Russian government shared their concern of the discovery of a US bioweapons lab in the country of Georgia .
You ’ ve commented how in Africa , US has set up bioweapons labs to work on Ebola , which I think is illegal under international law .
But they were allowed somehow to put those in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bigger picture ?
What ’ s going on with these different countries and what ’ s the purpose of this research ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : All these BSL-4 labs are by United States , Europe , Russia , China , Israel are all there to research , develop , test biological warfare agents .
There ’ s really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4 labs .
That figure I gave $ 100 billion , that was about 2015 I believe .
I had crunched the numbers and came up with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
To give you an idea that ’ s as much in constant dollars as the US spent to develop the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb .
So it ’ s clearly all weapons related .
We have well over 13,000 alleged life science scientists involved in research developed testing biological weapons here in the United States .
Actually this goes back it even precedes 9/11 2001 .
I have another book , The Future of International Law and American Foreign Policy , tracing that all the way back to the Reagan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and they got very heavily involved in research development testing of biological weapons with DNA genetic engineers .
It was because of that I issued my plea in 1985 in a Congressional briefing sponsored by the Council for Responsible Genetics , I ’ m a lawyer for them .
They ’ re headquartered in Cambridge , Mass .
All the MIT , Harvard people are involved in that , the principal ones .
And then they asked me to draft the implementing legislation .
The implementing legislation that I drafted was originally designed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Death science work ” , I call it , “ by the United States government ” .
After 9/11 , 2001 , it just completely accelerated .
My current figure , that last figure a 100 billion .
I haven ’ t had a chance to re-crunch the numbers because I just started classes .
But you have to add in about another 5 billion per year .
Basically , this is offensive biological weapons raised by the United States government and with its assistance in Canada and Britain .
And so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accordingly including Russia and China .
They were going to set up a whole series of BSL-4 facilities as well .
And you know Wuhan was the first .
It backfired on them .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: Would you basically consider what happened and Wuhan and just boil it down to ineptitude or incompetence on the Chinese part ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : Well , it ’ s criminality .
It does appear they stole something there from Winnipeg .
This activity that they engaged in clearly violates the Biological Weapons Convention @ @ @ @ @ @ @ days is an international crime , the use of it would be .
That was criminal .
I ’ m not saying they deliberately inflicted this on their own people , but it leaked out of there and all these BSL-4 facilities leak .
Everyone knows that and studies this .
So this was a catastrophe waiting to happen .
Unfortunately , it happened .
The Chinese government under Xi and his comrades there have been covering this up from the get-go .
The first reported case was December 1 , so they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they couldn ’ t anymore .
And everything they ’ re telling you is a lie .
It ’ s propaganda .
The WHO still refuses to declare a global health emergency .
It said Tedros was over there shaking hands with Xi and smiling and yanking it up .
The WHO was in on it .
They ’ ve approved many of these BSL-4 labs.
, they know exactly what ’ s going on and that is a WHO research-approved laboratory .
They know what ’ s going on too .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WHO is telling you about this , either they ’ re up to their eyeballs in it , in my opinion .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: I ’ d probably agree with you that this outbreak in Wuhan was an accidental leak from the laboratory .
But just your thoughts , it ’ s happening at quite an opportune time because namely we ’ re smack in the middle of a US-China new Cold War , which is currently characterized by economic warfare such as the trade war among other forms of hybrid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Wuhan outbreak will likely hit the Chinese economy hard .
The Chinese are flat out dismissing any idea that the US is involved in .
Like I said , it ’ s probably they made the mistakes in the Wuhan lab .
What are your thoughts of any seemingly , this would benefit the US… Dr. Francis Boyle : When the outbreak occurred , of course I considered that alternative too .
When you have an outbreak , you ’ re never quite sure who or what is behind it .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s ridiculous .
They made the same argument on Ebola in West Africa .
I demolished that online .
You can check it out .
So I kept competing theories about this .
But right now , when you originally contacted me , I said I wasn ’ t prepared to comment because I was weighing the evidence .
I ’ m a law professor and a lawyer , I try to do the best I can to weigh the evidence .
But right now , the Wuhan BSL-4 in my opinion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Occam ’ s razor , the simplest explanation .
I ’ m not ruling out some type of sabotage .
But right now , I believe that is the source here .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: And you mentioned WHO .
I ’ d like to just get your thoughts on the WHO and the Big Pharma .
There ’ s also some analysts who are downplaying this news media hype of the coronavirus .
You ’ ve just said that it seems to be lethal , but if we go back a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which I believe didn ’ t have too many casualties , but I think profited greatly the pharmaceutical companies .
If I recall that back in 2009 , many countries purchased great stocks of the vaccines and they ended up not using anywhere from 50 to 80 % of the vaccines that they purchased .
You ’ ve previously stated in an interview that the World Health Organization is a front for Big Pharma if I ’ m not mistaken .
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also agrees and he says , you know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from pharmaceutical companies .
And that the CDC itself has also severely compromised .
What are your thoughts on the WHO ?
The CDC ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : Can ’ t trust anything the WHO says because they ’ re all bought and paid for by Big Pharma and when they work in cahoots with the CDC , which is the United States government , they work in cahoots with Fort Detrick , so you can ’ t trust any of it .
However , the swine flu and yes , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but that swine flu which I looked at it , it did seem to me to be a genetically modified biological warfare weapon .
It was a chimera of three different types of genetic strains that someone put it together in a cocktail .
Fortunately , it was not as lethal as all of us fear .
So fine .
But as I said , this figure I just gave to you was Saturday from Lancet , which is a medical publication , saying it ’ s a 15 % fatality rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So it ’ s quite serious , I think , far more serious than the swine flu .
As for big pharma , sure they ’ re all trying to profit off this today as we speak .
There was a big article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal , all big pharma trying to peddle whatever they can over there in China even if it ’ s worthless and won ’ t help .
We do know , if you read the mainstream news media they say there there isn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it ’ s by the Pirbright Institute in Britain that ’ s tied into their biological warfare program over there .
They were behind the hoof and mouth disease outbreak over there that wiped out their cattle herd and it leaked out of there .
So it ’ s clear they ’ re working on a hoof and mouth biological warfare weapon , but the vaccine is there .
I have the patent for it here , I haven ’ t had a chance to read the patent it ’ s about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resume .
So eventually , I get some free time and I ’ ll read the patent .
You can ’ t patent a vaccine with the United States patent office unless the science is there .
So there is a vaccine .
Everyone ’ s lying about that , no one ’ s pointing this out – there ’ s a vaccine but instead big pharma wants to make money and the researchers say , well , it ’ ll take three months and we ’ re racing forward , you know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a buck off of this , that ’ s for sure .
But there is a vaccine , I have the patent here .
It ’ s been patented by the United States government .
So obviously , I don ’ t know exactly how workable it is , but it ’ s a vaccine .
I don ’ t know why it isn ’ t out there now ?
Why isn ’ t someone saying there is a vaccine ?
Perhaps political leaders have already been vaccinated for all I know , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But there is a vaccine , Pirbright is well known there in Britain and it ’ s tied into Fort Detrick and CDC is tied into Fort Detrick too .
So they all know there ’ s a patented vaccine .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: And just to get your comment on , I mean , something to related to this , which was my next question .
So I think , I ’ m not sure if it ’ s that same Institute that you just mentioned that has the patent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Melinda Gates foundation maybe funds or has some connection to that Institute that has the patent .
Dr. Francis Boyle : I think they do .
The Bill & Melinda Gates information , they fund this type of DNA genetically engineered biological warfare work .
That ’ s correct .
So you can ’ t trust anything they ’ re telling you that somehow they ’ re out there trying to make the world a better place .
I mean , we have Bill Gates publicly admitting that the world be a better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
So the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation , they are wolves in sheep ’ s clothing and they are funding this type of stuff .
Sure .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: And just your comment , there was also the report that I guess it was a consortium of companies which included the Gates foundation that back in just two or three months ago in October of 2019 they held a pandemic exercise simulating an outbreak .
I mean , what are the chances specifically of a coronavirus and it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this online online and they gave a list of seven recommendations for governments and international organizations to take .
I also find that kind of interesting how they had this simulation .
Dr. Francis Boyle : That ’ s correct .
It raises that question , the origins of what happened here .
But right now , I ’ m just looking at the evidence I have and applying Occam ’ s razor and we know that Wuhan BSL-4 was research developing , testing , SARS as a biological warfare agent .
So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it this DNA genetic engineering enhanced properties gain of function which we do here in the West , in the United States all the time .
We have all sorts of research that is clearly a bio warfare research that has been approved by the National Institutes of Health , it ’ s a joke .
They know full well they are proving all kinds of biological warfare research and it gets funded by the United States government .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: And you ’ ve also mentioned in the email to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lab level 4 in Wuhan calls into question the safety of all of these level 3and 4four labs around the world .
Dr. Francis Boyle : They ’ re complete unsafe .
BSL-3 and BSL-4 lab are only designed for research development testing of offense of biological warfare agents .
In my opinion , they serve no legitimate purpose at all .
They should all be shut down , every one of them .
Even assuming , they ’ re simply too dangerous .
If you want , there ’ s an excellent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Coen and I ’ m in there .
Repeatedly at the end , I say with respect to these labs , three and four , this is a catastrophe waiting to happen .
Well , I ’ m afraid the catastrophe is now happened .
So there it is .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: Yeah , I was just watching that documentary before we connected and I recommend the listeners go check that out .
Do you see , in the future , any countries , if we come to a conflict between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Arabia , Iran , China , Russia , I mean you name it .
Do you see any of these countries actually utilizing these biological weapons ?
I mean , it ’ s illegal under international law but we know like in the past that international law isn ’ t followed .
Do you think that there ’ s a real danger of this escalating ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : For sure .
That ’ s the only reason they develop these biological weapons to eventually be used , sure .
I mean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project , we put all that money into developing an atom bomb and even though it was not needed to end world war II they still knew Hiroshima and Nagasaki .
So , yes , I think that ’ s correct .
And also these can be used covertly .
Anytime you see an unexplained sudden outbreak of a disease like this anywhere in the world , both for human beings and or animals , I always suspect the bio warfare agent is at work .
I monitor the situation like I did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conclusion .
Yes , they can be used as the eyes for the United States government , today they are fully prepared , armed , equipped , supplied to wage a biological warfare with anthrax .
These other more exotic things I don ’ t know , but they have the weapons , there are stockpiles .
We have to understand if you read Seymour Martin Hersh ’ s book published about 1968 , he won the Pulitzer prize , he had the whole offensive US biological warfare industry in there back before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after 9/11 , 2001 , that entire industry – offensive biological warfare industry has been reconstituted here in the United States with all these BSL-4 BSL-3 labs , well over 13,000 , alleged scientists sort of like Dr. Mengele working on these things .
Other countries have responded in kind like Russia , like China , France is involved , Britain ’ s involved .
Sure .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: I just wanted to get your thoughts on , in the last few years there was the Russian double agent spy Sergei @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Novichok out in Britain and I thought it was funny .
It just so happened where he was allegedly poisoned , he was right in Porton down the British bio weapons lab , I guess the world ’ s first bio weapons lab that was created in 1916 .
I mean , I don ’ t know if you have thoughts on that whole incident .
Dr. Francis Boyle : Yeah , I was right down the street from Porton Down , so applying Occam ’ s razor who you think might ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a nerve agent .
A nerve agent would have killed him immediately .
This is Novichok .
It was something else like DX or something like that .
So fine .
But , I would just say that I don ’ t think that was a coincidence , but , you know , there you go .
There ’ s the , obviously there ’ s a lot of speculation on that .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: Something else that ’ s kind of interesting .
You ’ ve written in bio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there ’ s also Graeme Macqueen , I think your colleague who wrote the anthrax deception the case for domestic conspiracy… Dr. Francis Boyle : Everything you said in there .
That ’ s correct .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: I ’ m wondering also if this new war for biotechnological dominance , whatever you want to call it , if it can also be used kind of as a pretext for the centralization of political power and the initiation of wars like I guess it did in the 2003 Iraq war .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we get these events like now this coronavirus and then governments will call for a centralization of greater power and taking away some of our civil liberties ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : Sure .
If you look at the October , 2001 anthrax attacks here in the United States , that was clearly by elements of the United States government that was behind that .
That was a super weapons grade anthrax with a trillion spores per gram and it floated in the air solely a very sophisticated biological weapons lab like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they use that anthrax attack including on Congress to brand through the USA Patriot act which basically turned the United States to a police state which is what we have now .
You have to understand the Pentagon , Fort Dietrich made the dugway proving ground still has a stockpile of that super weapons grade anthrax that we saw in October of 2001 that they can use the next time they want to do something like that to further develop the American police thing .
Right .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: Is there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regarding this Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak or biological warfare or any other thoughts you ’ d like to leave us with ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : Well , you just can ’ t believe anything the Chinese government , the WHO , the CDC are telling .
They ’ re all lies because they know what ’ s going on here and so you ’ re going to have to figure it out as fast as you can .
But in my opinion , as of this time and I ’ m fully prepared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it does seem to me that this was a DNA genetically engineered biological warfare agent leaking out of Wuhan that has gain-of-function properties which can make it more lethal .
I think they are probably doing something with SARS to make it a lot more lethal and more infectious .
And so for that reason , you have to take extreme precautions and they ’ re now finally admitted anyone within six feet can be infected , whereas with SARS that was about two feet .
Well , that ’ s gaining a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a tip off .
So , I guess you ’ re gon na have to protect yourself .
Laurie Garrett had a pretty good essay in a foreign policy yesterday and she was over there covering the SARS and she has very good advice in there except that she took the SARS figure out two to three feet and said well , you got ta stay to two to three .
I think you ’ ve got to stay at least six feet away because this is gained function .
It can flow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can get you in the eyes .
Any orifice , the mouth , maybe the ears , we ’ re not sure at this point .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: I ’ m here on the border of China in Kazakhstan and I was just reading yesterday – today that they ’ re no longer allowing Chinese citizens into Kazakhstan without a medical paper , a medical check to get their visas to enter Kazakhstan Dr. Francis Boyle : Those medical checks are worthless because this is just public relations by all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day incubation period where people can still be infected .
So someone could walk right through a medical inspection and passing a gate into your country and then they come down with the coronavirus .
So that ’ s all public relations in my opinion by governments and they know it and they ’ re just sending people out there with temperatures and things like that .
It ’ s not like SARS , this is more dangerous than SARS .
As I said , I think that Wuhan lab , we know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were dealing with and I think they enhanced it at and I ’ m afraid that ’ s what we ’ re dealing with .
But you know , I ’ m keeping an open mind as to what other sources that might have and I wasn ’ t prepared to say anything until that Wuhan lab is right there and it ’ s dealing with coronavirus .
So again , apply Occam ’ s razor .
It seems to me that ’ s the simplest explanation here .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: @ @ @ @ @ @ @ final question would be in the months ahead , apart of what you say staying six feet away from people .
I ’ ve read taking high doses of vitamin C and other things like this can help you .
But , if they come out as the situation develops and if it gets worse and they come out with a coronavirus vaccine , should people take it or not ?
What are your thoughts ?
Dr. Francis Boyle : Well , what I would say is this .
Right now , if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wall Street Journal , big pharma is trying to sell all sorts of – they ’ re taking all their drugs off the shelf and say well let ’ s see if it works .
Which is preposterous .
Okay .
The scientists are saying , well , we can get you a vaccine maybe two to three months but they ’ re not tested .
So what we do know , however , is that Pirbright vaccine has been patented .
So all I can assume is that that might work .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ d be taking any of these other vaccines .
No , you have no idea what ’ s in there .
You ’ ll be the Guinea pig for big pharma and everyone figures they ’ re gon na make a lot of money here .
So I ’ ll keep my eye open on this and how it develop but I wouldn ’ t trust anything they ’ re trying to sell right now .
They ’ re just pulling these things off the shelf .
If they do come up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , even that ’ s not going to be tested in accordance with normal scientific protocol .
So it ’ s going to be a crap shoot .
If it ’ s going to help you , indeed it might not help you because they ’ ll be using for this vaccines ( these DNA genetic engineered vaccines ) they ’ ll be using live coronavirus probably and sticking it in there and giving you some live coronavirus on the theory you ’ ll develop an immunity .
That ’ s the way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , that ’ s what happened with the Ebola vaccine that created the Ebola pandemic there in West Africa .
They were testing out a vaccine on poor black Africans , as usual , and this vaccine had live Ebola in it so it gave them Ebola .
So again , I ’ d be very careful even if they do come up with these vaccines two to three months from now , very careful .
Why would you want to inject the live coronavirus in you ?
Hrvoje Mori ?
: All @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you have a strong online presence .
How can people best follow your work ?
I suppose to search for interviews as well as get your books .
Dr. Francis Boyle : Well , basically I ’ m blackballed and blacklisted off all the mainstream news media here on purpose .
As far as I can figure out , the US government gave an order that I should not be interviewed by anyone , so I ’ m not .
I guess you could just put my name in there under Google , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come up .
What happened was , right after the anthrax attacks of 9/11 2001 , I was giving a lecture out at Harvard m Alma Mater .
I was running a panel on biological warfare for the council for responsible genetics and it was at Harvard Divinity School and as I was going in , there was a Fox camera crew there from Boston and I said it looks to me like this has come out of the US government lab .
We know they do research and testing on anthrax .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Harvard then I gave an interview to a radio station in Washington , D C then I gave an interview on that to the BBC .
So the whole world saw it and at that point I was completely cut off and I ’ ve been cut off ever since .
So you probably not going to hear too many interviews from me here .
As for my book .
Biowarfare & Terrorism , you can just get it at amazon.com .
That picks up the story pretty much from 9/11 2001 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then there are interviews I ’ d given to an investigative reporter , Sherwood Ross and a big one I just sent you and you might want to put that on your web page .
That was pretty comprehensive .
Hrvoje Mori ?
: Yeah , I read that as well and I ’ ll include the link in the description of this interview so people can go check that out .
You ’ re not the only academic I know and have heard of others that similar things have happened and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we pay for telling the truth .
Again , for listeners , if people wanted to have a broader context and deeper understanding of what ’ s happening today especially with biological warfare as well as us foreign policy and international affairs , I urge you to get Dr. Francis Boyle ’ s books and listen to his interviews as well as his colleagues book .
Graeme Macqueen , The Anthrax Deception , The Case For Domestic Conspiracy .
Thank you for being with us , Dr. Boyle .
Dr. Francis Boyle : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ please understand these are my current opinions .
I could change my opinion here based on more evidence .
So I ’ m just looking at the evidence out there as I see it and you have to understand there is so much disinformation , lies and propaganda that it ’ s kind of very difficult to distinguish truth from fact .
I ’ m doing the best job I can here .
Here ’ s my own summary of the bioweapons origins of the coronavirus .
Listen and share :

Bombshell transcript: Dr. Francis Boyle’s interview on coronavirus as an “offensive biological warfare weapon”
A recent interview with Dr. Francis Boyle, conducted by Geopolitics & Empire, has been exploding across the 'net over the past few days as the truth is emerging on the origins of the coronavirus pandemic. It was an engineered biological weapon that escaped a BSL-4 lab in China, and now it's replicating on an exponential scale, threatening the entire human race.
Francis Boyle warned the world about bioweapons research starting in the 1980s. After speaking out about the U.S. bioweapons research efforts which were restarted after the staged events of 9/11 -- run by the deep state, of course -- Francis Boyle was blackballed from the entire media based on orders from the CIA.
Now, Boyle is one of the few courageous voices speaking the truth about the bioweapons origins of the coronavirus. In this bombshell interview (full transcript below), Boyle talks about:
The bioweapons origins of the coronavirus.
How the U.S. deep state deployed anthrax on U.S. soil to whip up publicity about biological weapons and increase funding for bioweapons labs.
Why the WHO and CDC are both criminal organizations which are complicit in the covert development of biological weapons.
The "death science" industry and why the U.S. government has spent over $100 billion developing self-replicating weapons that are deliberately designed to exterminate human life.
Details about the Pirbright Institute and its ties to bioweapons, depopulation, vaccines and coronavirus patents. (It's partially funded by Bill & Melinda Gates.)
Why all BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs in the world should be banned and shut down.
This is one of the most eye-opening, bombshell interviews you'll hear all year. I've added bolding emphasis on the really important parts, so if you skim this transcript, at least read the bolded sentences.
Geopolitics & Empire also has a channel on Brighteon.com, and we hope they will post more outstanding interviews there. You can find more work from this outstanding independent journalism organization at the Geopolitics & Empire website.
Brighteon.com/0a618138-5881-4805-83a1-24cc35fad34c
Full transcript:
Hrvoje Mori?: Geopolitics & Empire is joined by Dr. Francis Boyle, who is international law professor at the University of Illinois. We'll be discussing the Wuhan coronavirus and biological warfare. He's served as counsel to numerous governments such as Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Palestinian authority. He's represented numerous national international bodies in the areas of human rights, war crimes and genocide, nuclear policy, and biowarfare. He's written numerous books, one of my favorites being "Destroying Libya and World Order", which I assigned as mandatory reading material for my own students when I taught at the Monterrey Institute of Technology. But most important for this interview, he's written a book called “Biowarfare and Terrorism”, and drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the biological weapons convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that was approved unanimously by both houses of the US Congress and signed into law by President Bush. Thanks for joining us, Dr. Boyle.
Dr. Francis Boyle: Wow. Thank you so much for having me on and thanks for that kind introduction.
Hrvoje Mori?: Now let's get to what's been on the news recently. This coronavirus in Wuhan. There have been some reports recently, there's a really interesting website called Great Game India that has been reporting on this. They've been talking about China, which they say has been complying with biological weapons convention in recent years. But then there are some people in the US and experts that have been saying that in reality, China isn't complying with the weapons convention. And I think neither, perhaps the US as well. I'm wondering if China is developing its own biosafety level four lab in Wuhan and elsewhere, as you know, as a type of deterrence. Is it a type of a biological arms race that we have going on?
You told me in an email that you suspect China was developing the coronavirus as a dual use of biowarfare weapons agent. Also, what do you make of reports that Chinese scientists have been stealing research and viruses, including the coronavirus from a Canadian bio lab this past December? And as well, Chinese nationals have been charged with smuggling vials of biological research to China from the US with the aid of Charles Lieber who was the chair of Harvard's chemistry department. And he also happens to be in 2011 a strategic scientist at Wuhan University. So, can you tell us what's going on with this recent outbreak in Wuhan?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, that's a lot of questions. I guess we can take them one at a time, but if you just do a very simple Google search on “Does China have a BSL for laboratory?”, Wuhan comes up right away. It's at the top of the list. That's all with the moment this type of thing happened I began to do that. So a BSL-4 is the most serious type. And basically BSL-4 labs, we have many of them here in the United States, are used to develop offensive biological warfare weapons with DNA genetic engineering. So it does seem to me that the Wuhan BSL-4 is the source of the coronavirus. My guess is that they were researching SARS, and they weaponize it further by giving it a gain of function properties, which means it could be more lethal.
Indeed, the latest report now is it's a 15% fatality rate, which is more than SARS at 83% infection rate. A typical gain of function travels in the air so it could reach out maybe six feet or more from someone emitting a sneeze or a cough. Likewise, this is a specially designated WHO research lab. The WHO was in on it and they knew full well what was going on there. Yes. It's also been reported that Chinese scientists stole coronavirus materials from the Canadian lab at Winnipeg. Winnipeg is Canada's formal center for research, developing, testing, biological warfare weapons. It’s along the lines of Fort Detrick here in the United States of America. I have three degrees from Harvard. It would not surprise me if something was being stolen out of Harvard to turn over to China. I read that report. I don't know what was in those vials one way or the other.
But the bottom line is I drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention that was approved unanimously by both Houses in the United States Congress signed into law by President Bush Sr. that it appears the coronavirus that we're dealing with here is an offensive biological warfare weapon that leaped out of Wuhan BSL-4. I'm not saying it was done deliberately. But there had been previous reports of problems with that lab and things leaking out of it. I'm afraid that is what we are dealing with today.
Hrvoje Mori?: We'll be talking about the Wuhan and the coronavirus and China, but can you give us kind of like a bigger context. I know you've, previously, in interviews said that since 9/11, you think that the US has spent $100 billion on biological warfare research. We know the Soviet Union, if I'm not mistaken, developed anthrax as a bioweapon. And you've also mentioned that UK, France, Israel and China are all involved in biological warfare weapons research. And something interesting, I believe one or two years ago a Bulgarian journalist and the Russian government shared their concern of the discovery of a US bioweapons lab in the country of Georgia. You’ve commented how in Africa, US has set up bioweapons labs to work on Ebola, which I think is illegal under international law. But they were allowed somehow to put those in Africa. Can you give us like a bigger picture? What's going on with these different countries and what's the purpose of this research?
Dr. Francis Boyle: All these BSL-4 labs are by United States, Europe, Russia, China, Israel are all there to research, develop, test biological warfare agents. There's really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4 labs. That figure I gave $100 billion, that was about 2015 I believe. I had crunched the numbers and came up with that figure the United States since 9/11. To give you an idea that's as much in constant dollars as the US spent to develop the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb. So it's clearly all weapons related. We have well over 13,000 alleged life science scientists involved in research developed testing biological weapons here in the United States. Actually this goes back it even precedes 9/11 2001. I have another book, The Future of International Law and American Foreign Policy, tracing that all the way back to the Reagan administration under the influence of the neocons and they got very heavily involved in research development testing of biological weapons with DNA genetic engineers. It was because of that I issued my plea in 1985 in a Congressional briefing sponsored by the Council for Responsible Genetics, I'm a lawyer for them. They're headquartered in Cambridge, Mass. All the MIT, Harvard people are involved in that, the principal ones. And then they asked me to draft the implementing legislation.
The implementing legislation that I drafted was originally designed to stop this type of work. “Death science work”, I call it, “by the United States government”. After 9/11, 2001, it just completely accelerated. My current figure, that last figure a 100 billion. I haven't had a chance to re-crunch the numbers because I just started classes. But you have to add in about another 5 billion per year. Basically, this is offensive biological weapons raised by the United States government and with its assistance in Canada and Britain. And so other States, the world have responded accordingly including Russia and China. They were going to set up a whole series of BSL-4 facilities as well. And you know Wuhan was the first. It backfired on them.
Hrvoje Mori?: Would you basically consider what happened and Wuhan and just boil it down to ineptitude or incompetence on the Chinese part?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, it's criminality. It does appear they stole something there from Winnipeg. This activity that they engaged in clearly violates the Biological Weapons Convention. Research development of biological weapons these days is an international crime, the use of it would be. That was criminal. I'm not saying they deliberately inflicted this on their own people, but it leaked out of there and all these BSL-4 facilities leak. Everyone knows that and studies this. So this was a catastrophe waiting to happen. Unfortunately, it happened. The Chinese government under Xi and his comrades there have been covering this up from the get-go. The first reported case was December 1, so they'd been sitting on this until they couldn't anymore. And everything they're telling you is a lie. It's propaganda. The WHO still refuses to declare a global health emergency. It said Tedros was over there shaking hands with Xi and smiling and yanking it up. The WHO was in on it. They’ve approved many of these BSL-4 labs., they know exactly what's going on and that is a WHO research-approved laboratory. They know what's going on too. You can't really believe anything the WHO is telling you about this, either they're up to their eyeballs in it, in my opinion.
Hrvoje Mori?: I’d probably agree with you that this outbreak in Wuhan was an accidental leak from the laboratory. But just your thoughts, it's happening at quite an opportune time because namely we're smack in the middle of a US-China new Cold War, which is currently characterized by economic warfare such as the trade war among other forms of hybrid and technological warfare. And it seems the Wuhan outbreak will likely hit the Chinese economy hard. The Chinese are flat out dismissing any idea that the US is involved in. Like I said, it's probably they made the mistakes in the Wuhan lab. What are your thoughts of any seemingly, this would benefit the US…
Dr. Francis Boyle: When the outbreak occurred, of course I considered that alternative too. When you have an outbreak, you're never quite sure who or what is behind it. It certainly isn't bats, that's ridiculous. They made the same argument on Ebola in West Africa. I demolished that online. You can check it out. So I kept competing theories about this. But right now, when you originally contacted me, I said I wasn't prepared to comment because I was weighing the evidence. I'm a law professor and a lawyer, I try to do the best I can to weigh the evidence. But right now, the Wuhan BSL-4 in my opinion is the most likely source, apply Occam's razor, the simplest explanation. I'm not ruling out some type of sabotage. But right now, I believe that is the source here.
Hrvoje Mori?: And you mentioned WHO. I'd like to just get your thoughts on the WHO and the Big Pharma. There's also some analysts who are downplaying this news media hype of the coronavirus. You've just said that it seems to be lethal, but if we go back a decade to the 2009 swine flu, which I believe didn't have too many casualties, but I think profited greatly the pharmaceutical companies. If I recall that back in 2009, many countries purchased great stocks of the vaccines and they ended up not using anywhere from 50 to 80% of the vaccines that they purchased. You’ve previously stated in an interview that the World Health Organization is a front for Big Pharma if I'm not mistaken. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also agrees and he says, you know, 50% of WHO funding comes from pharmaceutical companies. And that the CDC itself has also severely compromised. What are your thoughts on the WHO? The CDC?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Can't trust anything the WHO says because they're all bought and paid for by Big Pharma and when they work in cahoots with the CDC, which is the United States government, they work in cahoots with Fort Detrick, so you can't trust any of it. However, the swine flu and yes, I agree pharma made a lot of money, but that swine flu which I looked at it, it did seem to me to be a genetically modified biological warfare weapon. It was a chimera of three different types of genetic strains that someone put it together in a cocktail. Fortunately, it was not as lethal as all of us fear. So fine. But as I said, this figure I just gave to you was Saturday from Lancet, which is a medical publication, saying it's a 15% fatality rate and an 83% infection rate. So it's quite serious, I think, far more serious than the swine flu.
As for big pharma, sure they're all trying to profit off this today as we speak. There was a big article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, all big pharma trying to peddle whatever they can over there in China even if it's worthless and won't help. We do know, if you read the mainstream news media they say there there isn't a vaccine. Well, there is, it's by the Pirbright Institute in Britain that's tied into their biological warfare program over there. They were behind the hoof and mouth disease outbreak over there that wiped out their cattle herd and it leaked out of there. So it's clear they're working on a hoof and mouth biological warfare weapon, but the vaccine is there. I have the patent for it here, I haven't had a chance to read the patent it's about 25 pages long and my classes just resume. So eventually, I get some free time and I’ll read the patent.
You can't patent a vaccine with the United States patent office unless the science is there. So there is a vaccine. Everyone's lying about that, no one's pointing this out - there's a vaccine but instead big pharma wants to make money and the researchers say, well, it'll take three months and we're racing forward, you know. Everyone's gonna make a buck off of this, that’s for sure. But there is a vaccine, I have the patent here. It's been patented by the United States government. So obviously, I don't know exactly how workable it is, but it's a vaccine. I don't know why it isn’t out there now? Why isn't someone saying there is a vaccine? Perhaps political leaders have already been vaccinated for all I know, I really don't know. But there is a vaccine, Pirbright is well known there in Britain and it's tied into Fort Detrick and CDC is tied into Fort Detrick too. So they all know there's a patented vaccine.
Hrvoje Mori?: And just to get your comment on, I mean, something to related to this, which was my next question. So I think, I'm not sure if it's that same Institute that you just mentioned that has the patent. I read somewhere that the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation maybe funds or has some connection to that Institute that has the patent.
Dr. Francis Boyle: I think they do. The Bill & Melinda Gates information, they fund this type of DNA genetically engineered biological warfare work. That's correct. So you can't trust anything they're telling you that somehow they're out there trying to make the world a better place. I mean, we have Bill Gates publicly admitting that the world be a better place if there were a lot less people. So the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation, they are wolves in sheep's clothing and they are funding this type of stuff. Sure.
Hrvoje Mori?: And just your comment, there was also the report that I guess it was a consortium of companies which included the Gates foundation that back in just two or three months ago in October of 2019 they held a pandemic exercise simulating an outbreak. I mean, what are the chances specifically of a coronavirus and it was called events 201. People can find this online online and they gave a list of seven recommendations for governments and international organizations to take. I also find that kind of interesting how they had this simulation.
Dr. Francis Boyle: That's correct. It raises that question, the origins of what happened here. But right now, I'm just looking at the evidence I have and applying Occam's razor and we know that Wuhan BSL-4 was research developing, testing, SARS as a biological warfare agent. So it could have been, they gave it this DNA genetic engineering enhanced properties gain of function which we do here in the West, in the United States all the time. We have all sorts of research that is clearly a bio warfare research that has been approved by the National Institutes of Health, it's a joke. They know full well they are proving all kinds of biological warfare research and it gets funded by the United States government.
Hrvoje Mori?: And you've also mentioned in the email to me that what happened in the biosafety lab level 4 in Wuhan calls into question the safety of all of these level 3and 4four labs around the world.
Dr. Francis Boyle: They're complete unsafe. BSL-3 and BSL-4 lab are only designed for research development testing of offense of biological warfare agents. In my opinion, they serve no legitimate purpose at all. They should all be shut down, every one of them. Even assuming, they're simply too dangerous. If you want, there's an excellent documentary called Anthrax Wars by Nadler and Coen and I'm in there. Repeatedly at the end, I say with respect to these labs, three and four, this is a catastrophe waiting to happen. Well, I'm afraid the catastrophe is now happened. So there it is.
Hrvoje Mori?: Yeah, I was just watching that documentary before we connected and I recommend the listeners go check that out. Do you see, in the future, any countries, if we come to a conflict between US, EU, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Russia, I mean you name it. Do you see any of these countries actually utilizing these biological weapons? I mean, it's illegal under international law but we know like in the past that international law isn't followed. Do you think that there's a real danger of this escalating?
Dr. Francis Boyle: For sure. That's the only reason they develop these biological weapons to eventually be used, sure. I mean, it's like the Manhattan project, we put all that money into developing an atom bomb and even though it was not needed to end world war II they still knew Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So, yes, I think that's correct. And also these can be used covertly. Anytime you see an unexplained sudden outbreak of a disease like this anywhere in the world, both for human beings and or animals, I always suspect the bio warfare agent is at work. I monitor the situation like I did at Wuhan until I can reach a conclusion. Yes, they can be used as the eyes for the United States government, today they are fully prepared, armed, equipped, supplied to wage a biological warfare with anthrax.
These other more exotic things I don't know, but they have the weapons, there are stockpiles. We have to understand if you read Seymour Martin Hersh's book published about 1968, he won the Pulitzer prize, he had the whole offensive US biological warfare industry in there back before it was illegal and criminal. Basically after 9/11, 2001, that entire industry - offensive biological warfare industry has been reconstituted here in the United States with all these BSL-4 BSL-3 labs, well over 13,000, alleged scientists sort of like Dr. Mengele working on these things. Other countries have responded in kind like Russia, like China, France is involved, Britain's involved. Sure.
Hrvoje Mori?: I just wanted to get your thoughts on, in the last few years there was the Russian double agent spy Sergei Skripal who had been allegedly poisoned with Novichok out in Britain and I thought it was funny. It just so happened where he was allegedly poisoned, he was right in Porton down the British bio weapons lab, I guess the world's first bio weapons lab that was created in 1916. I mean, I don't know if you have thoughts on that whole incident.
Dr. Francis Boyle: Yeah, I was right down the street from Porton Down, so applying Occam's razor who you think might've been behind this and it was not a nerve agent. A nerve agent would have killed him immediately. This is Novichok. It was something else like DX or something like that. So fine. But, I would just say that I don't think that was a coincidence, but, you know, there you go. There's the, obviously there's a lot of speculation on that.
Hrvoje Mori?: Something else that's kind of interesting. You've written in bio warfare and terrorism in your book and there's also Graeme Macqueen, I think your colleague who wrote the anthrax deception the case for domestic conspiracy...
Dr. Francis Boyle: Everything you said in there. That's correct.
Hrvoje Mori?: I'm wondering also if this new war for biotechnological dominance, whatever you want to call it, if it can also be used kind of as a pretext for the centralization of political power and the initiation of wars like I guess it did in the 2003 Iraq war. I mean, is this another danger that we get these events like now this coronavirus and then governments will call for a centralization of greater power and taking away some of our civil liberties?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Sure. If you look at the October, 2001 anthrax attacks here in the United States, that was clearly by elements of the United States government that was behind that. That was a super weapons grade anthrax with a trillion spores per gram and it floated in the air solely a very sophisticated biological weapons lab like Fort Detrick could produce that. And they use that anthrax attack including on Congress to brand through the USA Patriot act which basically turned the United States to a police state which is what we have now. You have to understand the Pentagon, Fort Dietrich made the dugway proving ground still has a stockpile of that super weapons grade anthrax that we saw in October of 2001 that they can use the next time they want to do something like that to further develop the American police thing. Right.
Hrvoje Mori?: Is there anything else you feel important to mention regarding this Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak or biological warfare or any other thoughts you'd like to leave us with?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, you just can't believe anything the Chinese government, the WHO, the CDC are telling. They're all lies because they know what's going on here and so you're going to have to figure it out as fast as you can. But in my opinion, as of this time and I'm fully prepared to consider further evidence on this, it does seem to me that this was a DNA genetically engineered biological warfare agent leaking out of Wuhan that has gain-of-function properties which can make it more lethal. I think they are probably doing something with SARS to make it a lot more lethal and more infectious. And so for that reason, you have to take extreme precautions and they're now finally admitted anyone within six feet can be infected, whereas with SARS that was about two feet. Well, that's gaining a function right there and that should be a tip off.
So, I guess you're gonna have to protect yourself. Laurie Garrett had a pretty good essay in a foreign policy yesterday and she was over there covering the SARS and she has very good advice in there except that she took the SARS figure out two to three feet and said well, you gotta stay to two to three. I think you've got to stay at least six feet away because this is gained function. It can flow through the air and infect and it can get you in the eyes. Any orifice, the mouth, maybe the ears, we're not sure at this point.
Hrvoje Mori?: I'm here on the border of China in Kazakhstan and I was just reading yesterday - today that they're no longer allowing Chinese citizens into Kazakhstan without a medical paper, a medical check to get their visas to enter Kazakhstan
Dr. Francis Boyle: Those medical checks are worthless because this is just public relations by all the governments involved because there is a 14 day incubation period where people can still be infected. So someone could walk right through a medical inspection and passing a gate into your country and then they come down with the coronavirus. So that's all public relations in my opinion by governments and they know it and they're just sending people out there with temperatures and things like that. It's not like SARS, this is more dangerous than SARS. As I said, I think that Wuhan lab, we know they had SARS in there that they were dealing with and I think they enhanced it at and I'm afraid that's what we're dealing with. But you know, I'm keeping an open mind as to what other sources that might have and I wasn't prepared to say anything until that Wuhan lab is right there and it's dealing with coronavirus. So again, apply Occam's razor. It seems to me that's the simplest explanation here.
Hrvoje Mori?: I guess my, one of my final question would be in the months ahead, apart of what you say staying six feet away from people. I've read taking high doses of vitamin C and other things like this can help you. But, if they come out as the situation develops and if it gets worse and they come out with a coronavirus vaccine, should people take it or not? What are your thoughts?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, what I would say is this. Right now, if you look at the article at the Wall Street Journal, big pharma is trying to sell all sorts of - they're taking all their drugs off the shelf and say well let's see if it works. Which is preposterous. Okay. The scientists are saying, well, we can get you a vaccine maybe two to three months but they're not tested. So what we do know, however, is that Pirbright vaccine has been patented. So all I can assume is that that might work. But I don't think I'd be taking any of these other vaccines. No, you have no idea what's in there. You'll be the Guinea pig for big pharma and everyone figures they're gonna make a lot of money here. So I'll keep my eye open on this and how it develop but I wouldn't trust anything they're trying to sell right now. They're just pulling these things off the shelf.
If they do come up with something in two to three months, even that's not going to be tested in accordance with normal scientific protocol. So it's going to be a crap shoot. If it's going to help you, indeed it might not help you because they'll be using for this vaccines (these DNA genetic engineered vaccines) they'll be using live coronavirus probably and sticking it in there and giving you some live coronavirus on the theory you'll develop an immunity. That's the way a lot of these vaccines worked out, that's what happened with the Ebola vaccine that created the Ebola pandemic there in West Africa. They were testing out a vaccine on poor black Africans, as usual, and this vaccine had live Ebola in it so it gave them Ebola. So again, I'd be very careful even if they do come up with these vaccines two to three months from now, very careful. Why would you want to inject the live coronavirus in you?
Hrvoje Mori?: All right. I don't believe you have a strong online presence. How can people best follow your work? I suppose to search for interviews as well as get your books.
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, basically I'm blackballed and blacklisted off all the mainstream news media here on purpose. As far as I can figure out, the US government gave an order that I should not be interviewed by anyone, so I'm not. I guess you could just put my name in there under Google, Google alert, and some interviews might come up. What happened was, right after the anthrax attacks of 9/11 2001, I was giving a lecture out at Harvard m Alma Mater. I was running a panel on biological warfare for the council for responsible genetics and it was at Harvard Divinity School and as I was going in, there was a Fox camera crew there from Boston and I said it looks to me like this has come out of the US government lab. We know they do research and testing on anthrax. Then I said the same thing there at Harvard then I gave an interview to a radio station in Washington, D C then I gave an interview on that to the BBC. So the whole world saw it and at that point I was completely cut off and I've been cut off ever since. So you probably not going to hear too many interviews from me here. As for my book. Biowarfare & Terrorism, you can just get it at amazon.com. That picks up the story pretty much from 9/11 2001 and until it went to press and then there are interviews I'd given to an investigative reporter, Sherwood Ross and a big one I just sent you and you might want to put that on your web page. That was pretty comprehensive.
Hrvoje Mori?: Yeah, I read that as well and I’ll include the link in the description of this interview so people can go check that out. You're not the only academic I know and have heard of others that similar things have happened and that's just I guess the price we pay for telling the truth. Again, for listeners, if people wanted to have a broader context and deeper understanding of what's happening today especially with biological warfare as well as us foreign policy and international affairs, I urge you to get Dr. Francis Boyle's books and listen to his interviews as well as his colleagues book. Graeme Macqueen, The Anthrax Deception, The Case For Domestic Conspiracy. Thank you for being with us, Dr. Boyle.
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, thank you and again, please understand these are my current opinions. I could change my opinion here based on more evidence. So I'm just looking at the evidence out there as I see it and you have to understand there is so much disinformation, lies and propaganda that it's kind of very difficult to distinguish truth from fact. I'm doing the best job I can here.
--- end interview
Here's my own summary of the bioweapons origins of the coronavirus. Listen and share:
Brighteon.com/a2192ba5-0b24-4b02-be20-698673aef67f


naturalnews--2020-02-04--Wow: Prominent Johns Hopkins surgeon and top gun control advocate may have FAKED a death threat in o

( Natural News ) As readers know , it ’ s not above a Leftist to fake a threat against himself or herself in order to advance their political objectives .
Racist hoaxes happen all the time , and nine out of 10 times it ’ s a Left-wing Democrat who is staging it .
One of the most famous recent hoaxes involved actor Jussie Smollett who tried to claim that a couple of MAGA-hat wearing white boys beat him up very early one Chicago morning about a year ago .
So this kind of behavior by Leftists isn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before .
A lot .
Now , it ’ s possible that a Left-wing emergency surgeon who ’ s a noted gun control advocate and assault weapons opponent may have faked a death threat against himself .
As reported by The Truth About Guns , Dr. Joseph Sakran , the director of emergency general surgery at Johns Hopkins , is interested in researching “ gun violence ; injury prevention ; outcomes research ; trauma system development ; public policy and advancement of surgery in poor resource settings , ” according to his profile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign for physicians known as # ThisIsOurLane and has testified in favor of a new “ assault weapons ” ban as well as universal background checks during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on “ gun violence ” last year .
“ Firearm injury and death in America is not only a disease , but a public health crisis in the United States .
Every day , an average of 109 individuals are killed and more than 240 people suffer injuries secondary to firearm violence .
While the United States is a world leader @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it comes to firearm injury prevention , ” Sakran testified .
“ Firearm-related injury and death is a public health problem creating a vast burden of disease across the spectrum of ages and socioeconomic groups in this country .
Additionally , firearm-related violence has a substantial economic burden of over 229 billion dollars per year to the United States health care system , ” he added .
Well , okay .
But his own employer , Johns Hopkins , reported in a 2016 study that medical errors are now the third-leading cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calculated to be in excess of 250,000 per year .
Nevertheless…guns are bad and so guns must go .
No one would advocate for getting rid of surgeons and doctors but guns…they ’ ve got to go .
Sakran has also been feted by the Democrat propaganda media over his gun control advocacy including the Washington Post and Forbes , so there ’ s that .
But over the weekend , Sakran sent a flurry of tweets claiming that he had been threatened with death and made the distinct implication that it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether to share this , & after a lot of thought here it is : Last week I ’ m leaving my home for work & I find this paper under my windshield .
One does not have to see the rest of the sentence that was covered to understand the intent of this message , a Death Threat .
For the record , when we tried to pull up the tweet , it had already been deleted by … someone .
But The Truth About Guns managed to screen grab the photo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ original tweet ( see above ) .
And while that clearly appears to be a threat , a closer look to the left of the pic on the vehicle ’ s windshield appears to be a reflection of the ceiling of Sakran ’ s garage ; a pull-down access door is plainly visible .
So … did he leave his garage door open all night or something ?
Did someone break into the garage to place the threatening note ?
Did he bother to call the police and if not , why not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have answers to these questions and we ’ re not saying that this incident was staged .
But based on the available evidence , there are sure a lot more questions than answers .

Wow: Prominent Johns Hopkins surgeon and top gun control advocate may have FAKED a death threat in order ‘make his case’ that firearms are bad
As readers know, it’s not above a Leftist to fake a threat against himself or herself in order to advance their political objectives.
Racist hoaxes happen all the time, and nine out of 10 times it’s a Left-wing Democrat who is staging it. One of the most famous recent hoaxes involved actor Jussie Smollett who tried to claim that a couple of MAGA-hat wearing white boys beat him up very early one Chicago morning about a year ago.
So this kind of behavior by Leftists isn’t new. It’s happened before. A lot.
Now, it’s possible that a Left-wing emergency surgeon who’s a noted gun control advocate and assault weapons opponent may have faked a death threat against himself.
As reported by The Truth About Guns, Dr. Joseph Sakran, the director of emergency general surgery at Johns Hopkins, is interested in researching “gun violence; injury prevention; outcomes research; trauma system development; public policy and advancement of surgery in poor resource settings,” according to his profile.
He also started the gun control campaign for physicians known as #ThisIsOurLane and has testified in favor of a new “assault weapons” ban as well as universal background checks during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on “gun violence” last year.
“Firearm injury and death in America is not only a disease, but a public health crisis in the United States. Every day, an average of 109 individuals are killed and more than 240 people suffer injuries secondary to firearm violence. While the United States is a world leader in many arenas, we are failing when it comes to firearm injury prevention,” Sakran testified.
“Firearm-related injury and death is a public health problem creating a vast burden of disease across the spectrum of ages and socioeconomic groups in this country. Additionally, firearm-related violence has a substantial economic burden of over 229 billion dollars per year to the United States health care system,” he added.
Well, okay. But his own employer, Johns Hopkins, reported in a 2016 study that medical errors are now the third-leading cause of death in the United States, calculated to be in excess of 250,000 per year.
A picture says a LOT
Nevertheless…guns are bad and so guns must go. No one would advocate for getting rid of surgeons and doctors but guns…they’ve got to go.
Sakran has also been feted by the Democrat propaganda media over his gun control advocacy including the Washington Post and Forbes, so there’s that.
But over the weekend, Sakran sent a flurry of tweets claiming that he had been threatened with death and made the distinct implication that it was over his gun control stances:
Debated whether to share this, & after a lot of thought here it is:
Last week I’m leaving my home for work & I find this paper under my windshield.
One does not have to see the rest of the sentence that was covered to understand the intent of this message, a Death Threat.
For the record, when we tried to pull up the tweet, it had already been deleted by … someone.
But The Truth About Guns managed to screen grab the photo that accompanied the good surgeon’s original tweet (see above). And while that clearly appears to be a threat, a closer look to the left of the pic on the vehicle’s windshield appears to be a reflection of the ceiling of Sakran’s garage; a pull-down access door is plainly visible.
So … did he leave his garage door open all night or something? Did someone break into the garage to place the threatening note? Did he bother to call the police and if not, why not?
Again, we don’t have answers to these questions and we’re not saying that this incident was staged. But based on the available evidence, there are sure a lot more questions than answers.
Sources include:
TheTruthAboutGuns.com
HopkinsMedicine.org
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-02-04--MIND-BLOWING: WikiHow web page tells kids “How to get vaccinated without parental consent” and then

( Natural News ) That ’ s right , wikiHow has gone and done the unthinkable .
The unfathomable .
The editors , publishers , and writers at wikiHow are outright medical criminal propagandists as they attempt to con American children to get dangerous , untested , experimental vaccines without parental consent .
Google is surely pushing this up high in the search engines for children to find , just as they push everything “ Wikipedia ” or “ wikiHow ” writes that ’ s bad for your health decision-making process , whether that ’ s regarding food , medicine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though , crosses the line .
The message – the headline at the top of the page tells American children outright “ How to Get Vaccinated without Parental Consent.
” The wikiHow message to American children and teens is this : Lie to your parents , lie about vaccine injuries , and lie that you researched it “ You are allowed to lie to your parents if it ’ s the only way you can get the information you need to protect your health .
Later , you can say that you researched @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a vaccine injury.
” Wait , what ?
So in this propaganda advice , the vaccine industry is readily admitting that vaccines are likely to cause damage to the child , but that the child should lie to their parents and say they researched it and realized they don ’ t .
Why else bring up the vaccine injury debate ?
Because the industry knows they ’ ve paid out $ 4 billion to vaccine-injured families , and most of that comes from those mercury-laced flu shots , not to mention the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Get vaccinated in secret ( if your local laws allow it ) .
Run the risk of your family finding out.
” Take a look yourself right now .
It ’ s unbelievable .
This is not fake news .
This is not some “ anti-vax ” rant .
This is pro-vaccine-violence and chemical medicine abuse instructing children to take the world ’ s most dangerous “ pre-medication ” – a.k.a .
vaccinations , without parental permission .
This is what is published right now on Wikipedia ’ s WikiHow .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ It gets worse… “ Figure out what ( if anything ) to say to your family .
You can say that you ’ re going out , and not specify where .
You can also tell a white lie , like saying that you are visiting a friend to study or hang out.
” America , you can ’ t make this up .
This is happening .
This is real .
The vaccine industry that you can ’ t sue ( there are really just 5 major vaccine manufacturers that are like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kids into injecting human abortion cells , formaldehyde , mercury , and African Green Monkey kidney cells all WITHOUT PARENTAL PERMISSION .
Is this message to all children of all ages in America ?
Should a 5-year-old lie to their parents and report to the flu-shot pushing school nurse ’ s office ?
We ’ re talking about the vaccine industry that literally spreads infectious diseases , including influenza and Measles , all over America using live “ weakened ” viruses in vaccines that are genetically modified and combined with E. coli bacteria @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s real , folks .
New Health Insurance Law literally cuts parents out of their kid ’ s “ medical decision-making ” You must be the worst parent in America .
Your kids are being advised to seek medical advice and dangerous intervention experimentation from the most corrupt medical industry in the country – the “ Evil Pharma-5 ” vaccine manufacturers .
Haven ’ t you heard of the new laws , coming to a state near you , and then your own ?
It ’ s already in effect .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ America .
The Left is enforcing abortion on the day of birth ( think New York infanticide ) , vaccines at gunpoint ( think HPV for 9-year old girls ) , and now they ’ re telling your kids to do all this without your permission and then lie to you about it all .
Your children are not under your medical authority .
You are not worthy .
Not in America you ’ re not .
The flu shot cripples children ’ s immune systems .
The MMR cripples their central nervous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bill ( 5889 ) that just kicked in January 1st , 2020 , allowing your children at 13 years young to withhold their medical information from you – the parents .
This is part of the mass movement to turn all children into demented perverts ( like the Leftist radicals ) who want to cut off or alter their genitals , all while causing cancer .
Watch out !
The gig is on .
America is under siege from medical furors who want to convince you that your children are not yours , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any time to be shipped off for medical experimentation by the State , abused at fake “ Day Care Centers ” across the country , and finally sold on the dark web ( virtual black market ) into sexual slavery .
Tune your natural health information dial to Vaccines.news for more reveals of propagandists at WaPo and Wikipedia that push toxic chemical medicine for cold hard cash payoffs from evil pharma .

MIND-BLOWING: WikiHow web page tells kids “How to get vaccinated without parental consent” and then lie about their vaccine injuries, too
That’s right, wikiHow has gone and done the unthinkable. The unfathomable. The editors, publishers, and writers at wikiHow are outright medical criminal propagandists as they attempt to con American children to get dangerous, untested, experimental vaccines without parental consent. Google is surely pushing this up high in the search engines for children to find, just as they push everything “Wikipedia” or “wikiHow” writes that’s bad for your health decision-making process, whether that's regarding food, medicine or personal care products. This, though, crosses the line. The message – the headline at the top of the page tells American children outright “ How to Get Vaccinated without Parental Consent .”
The wikiHow message to American children and teens is this: Lie to your parents, lie about vaccine injuries, and lie that you researched it
“You are allowed to lie to your parents if it's the only way you can get the information you need to protect your health. Later, you can say that you researched it and realized you don't have a vaccine injury.”
Wait, what? So in this propaganda advice, the vaccine industry is readily admitting that vaccines are likely to cause damage to the child, but that the child should lie to their parents and say they researched it and realized they don’t. Why else bring up the vaccine injury debate? Because the industry knows they’ve paid out $4 billion to vaccine-injured families, and most of that comes from those mercury-laced flu shots, not to mention the deadly HPV jab and the autism-linked MMR.
“Get vaccinated in secret (if your local laws allow it). Run the risk of your family finding out.” Take a look yourself right now. It’s unbelievable. This is not fake news. This is not some “anti-vax” rant. This is pro-vaccine-violence and chemical medicine abuse instructing children to take the world’s most dangerous “pre-medication” – a.k.a. vaccinations, without parental permission. This is what is published right now on Wikipedia’s WikiHow. Seriously. There’s more. It gets worse…
“Figure out what (if anything) to say to your family. You can say that you're going out, and not specify where. You can also tell a white lie, like saying that you are visiting a friend to study or hang out.”
America, you can’t make this up. This is happening. This is real. The vaccine industry that you can’t sue (there are really just 5 major vaccine manufacturers that are like monopolies in America) is conning your kids into injecting human abortion cells, formaldehyde, mercury, and African Green Monkey kidney cells all WITHOUT PARENTAL PERMISSION.
Is this message to all children of all ages in America? Should a 5-year-old lie to their parents and report to the flu-shot pushing school nurse’s office? We’re talking about the vaccine industry that literally spreads infectious diseases, including influenza and Measles, all over America using live “weakened” viruses in vaccines that are genetically modified and combined with E. coli bacteria. It's called shedding and it's real, folks.
New Health Insurance Law literally cuts parents out of their kid’s "medical decision-making"
You must be the worst parent in America. Your kids are being advised to seek medical advice and dangerous intervention experimentation from the most corrupt medical industry in the country – the “Evil Pharma-5” vaccine manufacturers. Haven’t you heard of the new laws, coming to a state near you, and then your own? It’s already in effect. No more medical freedom of choice in America. The Left is enforcing abortion on the day of birth (think New York infanticide), vaccines at gunpoint (think HPV for 9-year old girls), and now they’re telling your kids to do all this without your permission and then lie to you about it all.
Your children are not under your medical authority. You are not worthy. Not in America you’re not. The flu shot cripples children’s immune systems. The MMR cripples their central nervous system. Washington State has a Senate bill (5889) that just kicked in January 1st, 2020, allowing your children at 13 years young to withhold their medical information from you – the parents. This is part of the mass movement to turn all children into demented perverts (like the Leftist radicals) who want to cut off or alter their genitals, all while causing cancer.
Watch out! The gig is on. America is under siege from medical furors who want to convince you that your children are not yours, and that they can be seized at any time to be shipped off for medical experimentation by the State, abused at fake “Day Care Centers” across the country, and finally sold on the dark web (virtual black market) into sexual slavery.
Tune your natural health information dial to Vaccines.news for more reveals of propagandists at WaPo and Wikipedia that push toxic chemical medicine for cold hard cash payoffs from evil pharma.
Sources for this article include:
WikiHow.com
MyNorthwest.com
NaturalNews.com
Vaccines.news
VaccineSafety.edu
CDC.gov/vaccines
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-02-04--A potential cholesterol-lowering agent in olive leaves?

( Natural News ) Diabetes , particularly Type 2 diabetes , is now considered a global pandemic .
According to the World Health Organization , the global prevalence of diabetes among adults has risen from five percent to nearly nine percent in 2014 .
Diabetes is a chronic condition that can cause blindness , heart attacks , kidney failure , stroke and even death .
Statistics show that in 2016 , diabetes directly caused the death of about 1.6 million people worldwide .
In recent years , studies involving plants with anti-diabetic properties have yielded significant results .
One such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nutrition Research , focused on the health benefits of olive leaves , especially for prediabetics .
Olives ( Olea europaea ) are widely known for their antioxidant , anti-cancer and cardioprotective properties , but researchers from the University of Tsukuba in Japan found that their leaves can also help with lipid metabolism .
Oleuropein , a phytonutrient that can lower blood lipid levels , is the most abundant antioxidant found in fresh , unripe olives .
The study revealed that oleuropein is also present in olive leaves and has beneficial effects against dyslipidemia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The link between obesity , diabetes and blood cholesterol Being overweight or obese is a risk factor for Type 2 diabetes .
Research suggests that being overweight stresses the endoplasmic reticulum ( ER ) , a cell organelle responsible for processing proteins .
When the ER is overwhelmed by the influx of nutrients caused by overeating , it signals the cell to dampen down its insulin receptors .
This causes the cell to become less responsive to insulin , eventually resulting in insulin resistance and high blood sugar levels .
Insulin resistance is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Besides blood sugar , diabetes is also known to affect blood lipid levels .
People with diabetes tend to have lower levels of good cholesterol ( HDL ) and high levels of triglycerides and bad cholesterol ( LDL ) .
This condition , known as diabetic dyslipidemia , increases the risk of heart disease and stroke .
Diabetic dyslipidemia is a treatable risk factor for cardiovascular disease ; however , people can develop atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease before they are diagnosed with diabetes .
In their previous study , the researchers reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefits obese and diabetic individuals but not healthy ones .
They thus hypothesized that OLT may have a more pronounced effect on abdominal obesity , as well as glucose and lipid metabolism , in prediabetics .
To test this hypothesis , the researchers recruited individuals 40 to 70 years old with a body mass index of 23 – 29.9 kilograms ( kg ) /square meters ( m2 ) .
They randomly assigned the participants to either the OLT group or the low-concentration OLT ( LOLT ) group .
The intervention , which involved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of OLT or LOLT thrice daily during mealtime , lasted for 12 weeks .
The researchers found that after the intervention , serum levels of triglycerides and LDL significantly decreased in the OLT group .
These reductions were higher than those found in the LOLT group .
Although body weight , waist circumference and insulin levels did not significantly change in both groups , the fasting blood sugar levels of the OLT group were more significantly reduced than those of the LOLT group .
( Related : Olive Leaf Extract Proves Effective for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results , the researchers concluded that OLT can effectively lower the blood lipid levels of prediabetics .
Further studies , however , are needed to accurately determine the effect of olive leaves on abdominal obesity and glucose metabolism .

A potential cholesterol-lowering agent in olive leaves?
Diabetes, particularly Type 2 diabetes, is now considered a global pandemic. According to the World Health Organization, the global prevalence of diabetes among adults has risen from five percent to nearly nine percent in 2014. Diabetes is a chronic condition that can cause blindness, heart attacks, kidney failure, stroke and even death. Statistics show that in 2016, diabetes directly caused the death of about 1.6 million people worldwide.
In recent years, studies involving plants with anti-diabetic properties have yielded significant results. One such study, which appeared in the journal Nutrition Research, focused on the health benefits of olive leaves, especially for prediabetics. Olives (Olea europaea) are widely known for their antioxidant, anti-cancer and cardioprotective properties, but researchers from the University of Tsukuba in Japan found that their leaves can also help with lipid metabolism.
Oleuropein, a phytonutrient that can lower blood lipid levels, is the most abundant antioxidant found in fresh, unripe olives. The study revealed that oleuropein is also present in olive leaves and has beneficial effects against dyslipidemia, Type 2 diabetes and obesity.
The link between obesity, diabetes and blood cholesterol
Being overweight or obese is a risk factor for Type 2 diabetes. Research suggests that being overweight stresses the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), a cell organelle responsible for processing proteins. When the ER is overwhelmed by the influx of nutrients caused by overeating, it signals the cell to dampen down its insulin receptors. This causes the cell to become less responsive to insulin, eventually resulting in insulin resistance and high blood sugar levels. Insulin resistance is a precursor to Type 2 diabetes.
Besides blood sugar, diabetes is also known to affect blood lipid levels. People with diabetes tend to have lower levels of good cholesterol (HDL) and high levels of triglycerides and bad cholesterol (LDL). This condition, known as diabetic dyslipidemia, increases the risk of heart disease and stroke. Diabetic dyslipidemia is a treatable risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, people can develop atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease before they are diagnosed with diabetes.
Drinking olive leaf tea lowers blood lipid levels in prediabetics
In their previous study, the researchers reported that olive leaf tea (OLT) benefits obese and diabetic individuals but not healthy ones. They thus hypothesized that OLT may have a more pronounced effect on abdominal obesity, as well as glucose and lipid metabolism, in prediabetics. To test this hypothesis, the researchers recruited individuals 40 to 70 years old with a body mass index of 23 - 29.9 kilograms (kg)/square meters (m2). They randomly assigned the participants to either the OLT group or the low-concentration OLT (LOLT) group. The intervention, which involved consumption of 330 milliliters (mL) of OLT or LOLT thrice daily during mealtime, lasted for 12 weeks.
The researchers found that after the intervention, serum levels of triglycerides and LDL significantly decreased in the OLT group. These reductions were higher than those found in the LOLT group. Although body weight, waist circumference and insulin levels did not significantly change in both groups, the fasting blood sugar levels of the OLT group were more significantly reduced than those of the LOLT group. (Related: Olive Leaf Extract Proves Effective for Diabetes Treatment.)
Based on these results, the researchers concluded that OLT can effectively lower the blood lipid levels of prediabetics. Further studies, however, are needed to accurately determine the effect of olive leaves on abdominal obesity and glucose metabolism.
Sources include:
Science.news
WHO.int
Healthline.com
MedicineNet.com
Heart.org
Academic.OUP.com
ScienceDirect.com


naturalnews--2020-02-04--Study shows how viruses affect the bacteria populations in your gut, and what that means for your he

( Natural News ) Bacteriophages , also known as phages , are viruses that target and destroy bacteria .
An interesting thing about phages is that each one targets one specific strain of bacteria .
Because of this , doctors used phages to fight bacterial infections before the dawn of antibiotics .
Now , with the prevalence of antibiotic resistance , researchers are revisiting the idea of using phages to fight off bacterial infections instead of using antibiotics .
The dilemma here is that the gut contains millions of bacteria , meaning that these phages are likely to make an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gut .
Now , recent research reveals an interesting dynamic between bacteriophages and the microorganisms in the gut .
A study published in the journal Cell Host and Microbe found that a single strain of bacteriophage can alter both the bacterial composition and the levels of certain bioactive chemicals in the body .
The human body is full of trillions of microorganisms collectively known as a microbiome .
While bacteria are often associated with diseases , there are some bacteria – like the ones in the gut microbiome – that are actually vital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system , the heart and even weight .
In this study , researchers from the Brigham and Women ’ s Hospital and the Wyss Institute investigated the dynamic effects of bacteriophages on a model microbiome .
( Related : The health of your gut microbiome could predict your risk of heart disease , researchers find . )
“ One of the major interests in my lab is understanding the changes in the dynamics of the gut microbiome .
Bacteriophages are a huge component of the microbiome but haven ’ t been studied much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Georg Gerber .
The researchers used gnotobiotic mice raised in a way that they have absolutely no bacteria living on or inside their bodies .
To begin their experiment , the researchers introduced the mice to 10 different species of bacteria that commonly reside inside the human gut , including Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli .
Afterward , they added phages that specifically target the newly introduced bacteria to see the dynamics between the virus and the gut bacteria , as well as get accurate data on the successes of each microbe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discovered that phage predation on gut microorganisms not only directly impacted certain species of bacteria , but they also had cascading effects on the other bacterial species through interbacterial interactions .
Some of them proliferated while other bacteria populations dwindled .
The researchers also looked into the array of compounds produced by both the mouse and the bacteria colonizing the gut – this is called the metabolome .
As previously mentioned , they found that the phages introduced to the mice and the subsequent bacterial composition change influenced an alteration in the levels @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers , these phages can modulate the metabolites in the body , which are known to affect the mammalian host .
In short , a single strain of phage can make drastic changes to the biological molecules of the host animal .
While the whole experiment is based on an artificially constructed microbiome inside a rodent , it still creates a general overview of how phages interact with the microorganisms found in the gut .
“ Gnotobiotic mice , colonized with a limited and known but still complex collection of bacteria , present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the behavior of phages in the gut environment , ” wrote the researchers .
If the phages were able to make such changes in mice microbiome , they are also likely to affect human microbiome .
In the end , their research suggests that phages can potentially be a good tool for understanding the effects of other possible therapeutics that alter the microbiome .

Study shows how viruses affect the bacteria populations in your gut, and what that means for your health
Bacteriophages, also known as phages, are viruses that target and destroy bacteria. An interesting thing about phages is that each one targets one specific strain of bacteria. Because of this, doctors used phages to fight bacterial infections before the dawn of antibiotics. Now, with the prevalence of antibiotic resistance, researchers are revisiting the idea of using phages to fight off bacterial infections instead of using antibiotics. The dilemma here is that the gut contains millions of bacteria, meaning that these phages are likely to make an impact on the bacterial population in the gut. Now, recent research reveals an interesting dynamic between bacteriophages and the microorganisms in the gut.
A study published in the journal Cell Host and Microbe found that a single strain of bacteriophage can alter both the bacterial composition and the levels of certain bioactive chemicals in the body.
Bacteria vs. virus
The human body is full of trillions of microorganisms collectively known as a microbiome. While bacteria are often associated with diseases, there are some bacteria – like the ones in the gut microbiome – that are actually vital for the proper functioning of the immune system, the heart and even weight. In this study, researchers from the Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Wyss Institute investigated the dynamic effects of bacteriophages on a model microbiome. (Related: The health of your gut microbiome could predict your risk of heart disease, researchers find.)
"One of the major interests in my lab is understanding the changes in the dynamics of the gut microbiome. Bacteriophages are a huge component of the microbiome but haven't been studied much yet," said senior study author Dr. Georg Gerber.
The researchers used gnotobiotic mice raised in a way that they have absolutely no bacteria living on or inside their bodies. To begin their experiment, the researchers introduced the mice to 10 different species of bacteria that commonly reside inside the human gut, including Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. Afterward, they added phages that specifically target the newly introduced bacteria to see the dynamics between the virus and the gut bacteria, as well as get accurate data on the successes of each microbe.
From the experiments, the scientists discovered that phage predation on gut microorganisms not only directly impacted certain species of bacteria, but they also had cascading effects on the other bacterial species through interbacterial interactions. Some of them proliferated while other bacteria populations dwindled.
The researchers also looked into the array of compounds produced by both the mouse and the bacteria colonizing the gut – this is called the metabolome. As previously mentioned, they found that the phages introduced to the mice and the subsequent bacterial composition change influenced an alteration in the levels of bioactive chemicals. According to the researchers, these phages can modulate the metabolites in the body, which are known to affect the mammalian host. In short, a single strain of phage can make drastic changes to the biological molecules of the host animal.
While the whole experiment is based on an artificially constructed microbiome inside a rodent, it still creates a general overview of how phages interact with the microorganisms found in the gut.
"Gnotobiotic mice, colonized with a limited and known but still complex collection of bacteria, present an attractive model system for comprehensively characterizing the behavior of phages in the gut environment," wrote the researchers.
If the phages were able to make such changes in mice microbiome, they are also likely to affect human microbiome. In the end, their research suggests that phages can potentially be a good tool for understanding the effects of other possible therapeutics that alter the microbiome.
Sources include:
MedicalNewsToday.com
ScienceDirect.com 1
ScienceDirect.com 2