naturalnews--2020-01-12--WikiHow goes insane with vaccine propaganda, teaches children how to "get vaccinated in secret" by s

WikiHow goes insane with vaccine propaganda, teaches children how to "get vaccinated in secret" by scheming against "anti-vaxxer" parents who WikiHow warns might "abuse" their own children

The WikiHow article , entitled , “ How to Get Vaccinated Without Parental Consent , ” begins by warning children that their parents might “ fall into rabbit holes of conspiracy theories ” about vaccines , falsely implying that all evidence of vaccine dangers or vaccine injuries is a “ conspiracy.
” The article appears at this link : The article goes on to teach children how to “ get vaccinated in secret ” and claims that anti-vaccine parents might “ abuse you if they learned that you disobeyed them.
” ( These are actual quotes from the WikiHow article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shot from the article itself : The article also implores children to recruit doctors “ or another responsible adult ” to coerce parents into allowing unlimited vaccinations , implying that only those adults who promote vaccines are “ responsible.
” This is yet more clear evidence that the article was written by the same group of Big Pharma propagandists who have taken over Wikipedia , too .
100 % organic essential oil sets now available for your home and personal care , including Rosemary , Oregano , Eucalyptus , Tea Tree , Clary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organic and laboratory tested for safety .
A multitude of uses , from stress reduction to topical first aid .
See the complete listing here , and help support this news site .
Many vaccines — including vaccines that contain mercury — are never tested for safety in pediatric patients ( children and teens ) , yet it is exactly those children who are being targeted by WikiHow in one of the most dangerous and brazen assaults on parental rights and child safety that has ever been hosted by any tech platform .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ showing the actual insert sheet of a popular flu vaccine for more proof .
This article is so dangerous to public health that WikiHow deserves to be sued by parents and criminally investigated for publishing it .
U.S. government confirms billions have been paid out to families of vaccine injured children – an irrefutable fact denied by WikiHow In truth , vaccine insert sheets openly admit that vaccines are dangerous and , in most cases , never even subjected to clinical trials for safety or effectiveness .
These damning facts about vaccine safety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so-called “ Secret Vaccine Court ” ( the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ) has already paid out over $ 4 billion to families of vaccine-injured children , and more claims are filed each year .
That program publishes a “ vaccine injury table ” that lists some of the many injuries known to be caused by vaccines .
The program also reveals that , as of 2019 , over $ 4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine-injured children : Since 1988 , over 21,491 petitions have been filed with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ period , 18,473 petitions have been adjudicated , with 7,044 of those determined to be compensable , while 11,429 were dismissed .
Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $ 4.2 billion .
A detailed PDF report published by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program lists the influenza vaccine as responsible for 3,647 of the injury petitions , and the MMR vaccine responsible for 252 petition .
The Tdap vaccine accounts for another 470 petitions .
The report reveals that more petitions were filed in 2019 than in almost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s existence , demonstrating that vaccines are trending toward causing more injury , not less .
WikiHow glosses over the fact that most vaccines have never been clinically tested for safety or effectiveness The WikiHow article tries to brainwash children into thinking that vaccines are universally safe and effective when , in reality , vaccine manufacturers openly admit their vaccines are backed by no real science at all .
For example , the Flulaval vaccine insert sheet , detailed in this Natural News article , reveals that no controlled trials have been conducted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any decrease whatsoever in influenza infections : The highlighted text reads , “ …there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.
” Furthermore , that same insert sheet openly admits that the safety of the flu shot — which contains mercury — has never been established in children .
Notably , this is the exact same demographic being targeted by WikiHow in their article that attempts to convince children to lie to their parents and get secretly vaccinated with toxic vaccines that may quite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effectiveness of FLULAVAL in pediatric patients have not been established.
” “ FLULAVAL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential , or for impairment of fertility.
” “ Thimerosal , a mercury derivative , is added as a preservative .
Each … dose contains 50 mcg thimerosal .
Each dose may also contain residual amounts of ovalbumin , formaldehyde , and sodium deoxycholate from the manufacturing process.
” WikiHow implores children : “ You are allowed to lie to your parents ” by using a “ cover story ” In step @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to deceive their parents and get vaccinated without parental consent , the site urges children to lie to their parents : You are allowed to lie to your parents if it ’ s the only way you can get the information you need to protect your health .
Later , you can say that you researched it and realized you don ’ t have a vaccine injury .
Of course , the WikiHow article fails to tell the reader that getting vaccinated may cause them to end up with paralysis , a coma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prohibit them from being able to explain later that “ you don ’ t have a vaccine injury.
” ( Children killed by vaccines are unable to talk about their vaccine injuries , it turns out . )
The WikiHow article also proposes various lies that children and teens can use on their parents , saying , “ If your parents are distrustful , prepare your cover story especially well.
” Young readers are urged to literally stage a fake photo shoot of their “ cover story ” activity so they can prove @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they actually participated in that activity rather than being vaccinated .
From the WikiHow article : If your parents are distrustful , prepare your cover story especially well .
Try actually doing your cover story activity on a different day , and even taking a selfie doing that thing with your friend .
This way , you ’ ll have “ evidence ” of doing it , and can answer questions if they quiz you .
Vaccine industry using Big Tech platforms to try to weaponize children against their own parents and function @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The blatant propaganda article by WikiHow blatantly seeks to turn children against their own parents while surrendering to the “ vaccine state ” which systematically lies to the public about the safety or efficacy of vaccines .
The WikiHow article names no authors and says it was written by anonymous contributors , most of whom no doubt work for the vaccine industry itself .
The article goes on to state that children should “ Get vaccinated in secret ” or “ petition the court for emancipation if your parents are really bad.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ their doctors against their “ anti-vaxxer parents , ” explaining : If you think that your parents might have told you something false , you can relate what they said to the doctor , and ask if it ’ s a myth .
Finally , WikiHow tells young readers they should reward themselves with ice cream or a candy bar after lying to their parents , staging a fake cover story and conspiring with ( pharma-bribed ) doctors to get vaccinated with dangerous , life-threatening vaccines .
“ Buy a treat , like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” says WikiHow .
WikiHow encourages young readers to expose family members to “ viral shedding ” that can spread infections and compromise the health of the elderly After being vaccinated , readers are advised to continue lying to their parents , even though many vaccines cause “ viral shedding ” that can expose family members to the same live viruses used in the vaccine themselves .
“ Remember that you don ’ t have to tell your parents about getting vaccinated , ” says WikiHow .
“ You can keep your health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be mean to you or make you feel unsafe as a result of your choices , ” once again implying that anti-vaxxer parents are somehow violent child abusers when , in reality , it ’ s the vaccine industry that commits routine violence against children .
The “ Community Q & A ” section below the WikiHow article claims that all people who rationally discuss vaccine injuries , harmful vaccine ingredients and vaccine risks are “ snake-oil peddlers ” who “ distrust authority ” and are engaged in “ conspiracy theories.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Big Pharma and the vaccine deep state as America collapses into a “ pharma state ” WikiHow ’ s descent into vaccine propaganda is little surprise , given that Google , Facebook , Twitter , Vimeo , Pinterest , YouTube and all the other prominent tech platforms have also surrendered to Big Pharma and the criminal vaccine industry .
All rational voices that raise awareness of vaccine injuries , vaccine ingredients or vaccine safety are instantly de-platformed across all prominent tech platforms .
All those who dare to question vaccines are immediately deemed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The tech giants now universally enforce the big three lies of the vaccine industry : Lie # 1 ) All vaccines are safe and never harm anyone .
Lie # 2 ) All vaccines work and never fail .
Lie # 3 ) All vaccines are clinically tested for safety and rooted in solid scientific testing .
None of those lies are true , of course , which is why the tech giants must resort to censorship and slander to try to silence the voices of reason that are armed with real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines .
Watch my mini-documentary below to learn how America has collapsed into a “ pharma state ” that ’ s run by the pharmaceutical / vaccine cartels : What ’ s next ?
Will Wikihow teach children how to cut off their own genitals in secret DIY transgenderism experiments ?
It ’ s not hard to see where all this is going .
Soon , WikiHow will likely join the DIY transgenderism movement and probably host another how-to article entitled something like , “ How to secretly cut off your penis and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about it.
” Beware of any tech platform that surreptitiously pits children against their own parents while promoting the propaganda of the vaccine cartels and government “ authorities.
” How to complain to WikiHow for publishing this extremely dangerous , irresponsible article that puts the lives of children at risk while weaponizing children against their own parents WikiHow claims their how-to articles can be edited by the public .
Have no illusions that , just like with Wikipedia , this claim is a complete scam and all article editing is tightly controlled by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obviously working for the pharma cartels and the malicious vaccine industry .
However , if you wish to attempt to edit this WikiHow article , you can do so at this link : You can also post feedback to the article authors by clicking the “ Send fan mail to authors ” link below the article itself .
Finally , there is a Yes / No voting box at the very bottom of the article page , below the Q & A section .
A question there reads , “ Did this article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ YES or NO .
The bottom line ?
WikiHow is now the enemy of children , just like Google is the enemy of human knowledge and Twitter is an enemy of humanity .

(Natural News) The WikiHow website, a hub for how-to information, has joined the other evil tech giants by going all-in with vaccine propaganda that poses a very real danger to the health and safety of children. The site now features a dangerous article that teaches children how to scheme against their own parents and stage fake cover stories to get vaccinated with toxic vaccines that even the U.S. government admits cause thousands of injuries, hospitalizations and even some deaths every year in America. (VAERS.HHS.gov and HRSA.gov)
The WikiHow article, entitled, “How to Get Vaccinated Without Parental Consent,” begins by warning children that their parents might “fall into rabbit holes of conspiracy theories” about vaccines, falsely implying that all evidence of vaccine dangers or vaccine injuries is a “conspiracy.” The article appears at this link:
https://www.wikihow.com/Get-Vaccinated-Without-Parental-Consent
The article goes on to teach children how to “get vaccinated in secret” and claims that anti-vaccine parents might “abuse you if they learned that you disobeyed them.” (These are actual quotes from the WikiHow article.) Here’s a screen shot from the article itself:
The article also implores children to recruit doctors “or another responsible adult” to coerce parents into allowing unlimited vaccinations, implying that only those adults who promote vaccines are “responsible.” This is yet more clear evidence that the article was written by the same group of Big Pharma propagandists who have taken over Wikipedia, too.
Discover how to prevent and reverse heart disease (and other cardio related events) with this free ebook: Written by popular Natural News writer Vicki Batt, this book includes everything you need to know about preventing heart disease, reversing hypertension, and nurturing your cardiac health without medication. Learn More.
Many vaccines — including vaccines that contain mercury — are never tested for safety in pediatric patients (children and teens), yet it is exactly those children who are being targeted by WikiHow in one of the most dangerous and brazen assaults on parental rights and child safety that has ever been hosted by any tech platform. See the stunning photos, below, showing the actual insert sheet of a popular flu vaccine for more proof.
This article is so dangerous to public health that WikiHow deserves to be sued by parents and criminally investigated for publishing it.
U.S. government confirms billions have been paid out to families of vaccine injured children – an irrefutable fact denied by WikiHow
In truth, vaccine insert sheets openly admit that vaccines are dangerous and, in most cases, never even subjected to clinical trials for safety or effectiveness. These damning facts about vaccine safety are never mentioned by WikiHow.
The so-called “Secret Vaccine Court” (the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) has already paid out over $4 billion to families of vaccine-injured children, and more claims are filed each year.
That program publishes a “vaccine injury table” that lists some of the many injuries known to be caused by vaccines.
The program also reveals that, as of 2019, over $4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine-injured children:
Since 1988, over 21,491 petitions have been filed with the VICP. Over that 30-year time period, 18,473 petitions have been adjudicated, with 7,044 of those determined to be compensable, while 11,429 were dismissed. Total compensation paid over the life of the program is approximately $4.2 billion.
A detailed PDF report published by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program lists the influenza vaccine as responsible for 3,647 of the injury petitions, and the MMR vaccine responsible for 252 petition. The Tdap vaccine accounts for another 470 petitions. The report reveals that more petitions were filed in 2019 than in almost any other year in the program’s existence, demonstrating that vaccines are trending toward causing more injury, not less.
WikiHow glosses over the fact that most vaccines have never been clinically tested for safety or effectiveness
The WikiHow article tries to brainwash children into thinking that vaccines are universally safe and effective when, in reality, vaccine manufacturers openly admit their vaccines are backed by no real science at all.
For example, the Flulaval vaccine insert sheet, detailed in this Natural News article, reveals that no controlled trials have been conducted that show the flu shot results in any decrease whatsoever in influenza infections:
The highlighted text reads, “…there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.”
Furthermore, that same insert sheet openly admits that the safety of the flu shot — which contains mercury — has never been established in children. Notably, this is the exact same demographic being targeted by WikiHow in their article that attempts to convince children to lie to their parents and get secretly vaccinated with toxic vaccines that may quite literally kill them:
“Safety and effectiveness of FLULAVAL in pediatric patients have not been established.”
“FLULAVAL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.”
“Thimerosal, a mercury derivative, is added as a preservative. Each … dose contains 50 mcg thimerosal. Each dose may also contain residual amounts of ovalbumin, formaldehyde, and sodium deoxycholate from the manufacturing process.”
WikiHow implores children: “You are allowed to lie to your parents” by using a “cover story”
In step 3 of the WikiHow scheme for children to deceive their parents and get vaccinated without parental consent, the site urges children to lie to their parents:
You are allowed to lie to your parents if it’s the only way you can get the information you need to protect your health. Later, you can say that you researched it and realized you don’t have a vaccine injury.
Of course, the WikiHow article fails to tell the reader that getting vaccinated may cause them to end up with paralysis, a coma or death, all of which would prohibit them from being able to explain later that “you don’t have a vaccine injury.” (Children killed by vaccines are unable to talk about their vaccine injuries, it turns out.)
The WikiHow article also proposes various lies that children and teens can use on their parents, saying, “If your parents are distrustful, prepare your cover story especially well.”
Young readers are urged to literally stage a fake photo shoot of their “cover story” activity so they can prove to their dangerous, distrustful parents that they actually participated in that activity rather than being vaccinated. From the WikiHow article:
If your parents are distrustful, prepare your cover story especially well. Try actually doing your cover story activity on a different day, and even taking a selfie doing that thing with your friend. This way, you’ll have “evidence” of doing it, and can answer questions if they quiz you.
Vaccine industry using Big Tech platforms to try to weaponize children against their own parents and function as subjects of the “vaccine state”
The blatant propaganda article by WikiHow blatantly seeks to turn children against their own parents while surrendering to the “vaccine state” which systematically lies to the public about the safety or efficacy of vaccines. The WikiHow article names no authors and says it was written by anonymous contributors, most of whom no doubt work for the vaccine industry itself.
The article goes on to state that children should “Get vaccinated in secret” or “petition the court for emancipation if your parents are really bad.”
It also urges children to leverage their doctors against their “anti-vaxxer parents,” explaining:
If you think that your parents might have told you something false, you can relate what they said to the doctor, and ask if it’s a myth.
Finally, WikiHow tells young readers they should reward themselves with ice cream or a candy bar after lying to their parents, staging a fake cover story and conspiring with (pharma-bribed) doctors to get vaccinated with dangerous, life-threatening vaccines. “Buy a treat, like ice cream from your favorite place,” says WikiHow.
WikiHow encourages young readers to expose family members to “viral shedding” that can spread infections and compromise the health of the elderly
After being vaccinated, readers are advised to continue lying to their parents, even though many vaccines cause “viral shedding” that can expose family members to the same live viruses used in the vaccine themselves.
“Remember that you don’t have to tell your parents about getting vaccinated,” says WikiHow. “You can keep your health choices to yourself, especially if they would be mean to you or make you feel unsafe as a result of your choices,” once again implying that anti-vaxxer parents are somehow violent child abusers when, in reality, it’s the vaccine industry that commits routine violence against children.
The “Community Q&A” section below the WikiHow article claims that all people who rationally discuss vaccine injuries, harmful vaccine ingredients and vaccine risks are “snake-oil peddlers” who “distrust authority” and are engaged in “conspiracy theories.”
The tech giants are now run by Big Pharma and the vaccine deep state as America collapses into a “pharma state”
WikiHow’s descent into vaccine propaganda is little surprise, given that Google, Facebook, Twitter, Vimeo, Pinterest, YouTube and all the other prominent tech platforms have also surrendered to Big Pharma and the criminal vaccine industry.
All rational voices that raise awareness of vaccine injuries, vaccine ingredients or vaccine safety are instantly de-platformed across all prominent tech platforms.
All those who dare to question vaccines are immediately deemed irrational, dishonest or dangerous to society.
The tech giants now universally enforce the big three lies of the vaccine industry:
Lie #1) All vaccines are safe and never harm anyone.
Lie #2) All vaccines work and never fail.
Lie #3) All vaccines are clinically tested for safety and rooted in solid scientific testing.
None of those lies are true, of course, which is why the tech giants must resort to censorship and slander to try to silence the voices of reason that are armed with real facts about the very real dangers of vaccines.
Watch my mini-documentary below to learn how America has collapsed into a “pharma state” that’s run by the pharmaceutical / vaccine cartels:
What’s next? Will Wikihow teach children how to cut off their own genitals in secret DIY transgenderism experiments?
It’s not hard to see where all this is going. Soon, WikiHow will likely join the DIY transgenderism movement and probably host another how-to article entitled something like, “How to secretly cut off your penis and become a transgender without your parents knowing about it.”
Beware of any tech platform that surreptitiously pits children against their own parents while promoting the propaganda of the vaccine cartels and government “authorities.”
How to complain to WikiHow for publishing this extremely dangerous, irresponsible article that puts the lives of children at risk while weaponizing children against their own parents
WikiHow claims their how-to articles can be edited by the public. Have no illusions that, just like with Wikipedia, this claim is a complete scam and all article editing is tightly controlled by a monopoly of malicious individuals who are obviously working for the pharma cartels and the malicious vaccine industry.
However, if you wish to attempt to edit this WikiHow article, you can do so at this link:
https://www.wikihow.com/Get-Vaccinated-Without-Parental-Consent#edit
You can also post feedback to the article authors by clicking the “Send fan mail to authors” link below the article itself.
Finally, there is a Yes / No voting box at the very bottom of the article page, below the Q&A section. A question there reads, “Did this article help you?” You can vote YES or NO.
The bottom line? WikiHow is now the enemy of children, just like Google is the enemy of human knowledge and Twitter is an enemy of humanity.


naturalnews--2020-01-12--As of January 1, 2020, the cancer industry has now killed 20 million people around the world since t

As of January 1, 2020, the cancer industry has now killed 20 million people around the world since the year 2000

( Natural News ) If you ’ re curious how many people are dying from things that the government claims are “ safe and effective , ” look no further than the Pharma Death Clock website , which explains that more than 20 million people have died from chemotherapy alone since the year 2000 .
As it turns out , the chemical cocktails manufactured by Big Pharma kill orders of magnitude more people than world wars and acts of terrorism combined , which makes the pharmaceutical industry the number-one killer in our world today .
Since the year 2000 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taking opioid pharmaceuticals , even as the cannabis plant remains federally outlawed and kratom ( mitragyna speciose ) , a natural alternative to opioids , is under constant attack by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) .
Antibiotic-resistant superbugs , which were spawned by Big Pharma ’ s death “ medicines , ” have also killed more than 14 million people since the year 2000 , while psychiatric drugs have killed more than 10 million people .
Another top killer of people in the world today is general medicine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as these are also called , clock in at nearly 16 million people since the year 2000 .
Other prominent causes of death in our world today include hospital errors at nearly nine million deaths since 2000 , drug-resistant tuberculosis at more than four million deaths , bedsores at nearly 2.5 million deaths , hospital malnutrition at nearly 2.2 million deaths , adverse drug reactions at nearly 2.2 million deaths , medical errors at nearly two millions deaths , hospital infections at more than 1.5 million deaths , and SSRIs ( selective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million deaths .
The power of the elements : Discover Colloidal Silver Mouthwash with quality , natural ingredients like Sangre de Drago sap , black walnut hulls , menthol crystals and more .
Zero artificial sweeteners , colors or alcohol .
Learn more at the Health Ranger Store and help support this news site .
The list goes on and on , and you can peruse it yourself at PharmaDeathClock.com .
If the government says it ’ s bad , then it ’ s probably good – and vice versa The point , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of humans is government-sanctioned “ medicine ” and all of its associated parts – not vapes , raw milk , plants , guns , or any of the other things that nanny state tyrants and the agencies that they control claim are destroying society .
“ Conservatives ” are notorious for demanding that the government ban this herb or that plant in order to “ protect the children ” and “ our communities ” from “ harm.
” Liberals , as we know , do the exact same thing , except it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Nevertheless , the common thread is that everyone is focused on the wrong things when it comes to truly keeping our communities safe .
If people really care about others ’ well-being , then the first thing we need to eliminate from our streets are CVS and Walgreens stores on every corner , and hospital compounds in every city .
As it turns out , these are the poison dispensaries responsible for destroying human lives in a variety of ways , including with deadly drugs , infectious filth , and hospital errors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have the FDA and CDC crack down on these institutions for destroying families ?
Instead , all we ever hear about is the “ need ” to eliminate our freedoms and liberties in order to keep everyone “ safe.
” That means no cannabis , no kratom , no raw milk , no clean food that ’ s sold without a “ permit , ” no free speech , no guns , and basically no self-autonomy – because only the government knows what ’ s best for you and your family .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ bombs Middle Eastern terrorists , the truth is that America ’ s mental health is being chemically carpet bombed every single day that Big Pharma is allowed to advertise on television , directly to consumers , ” writes Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , comparing death by pharmaceuticals to death by drone strikes .
For more related news about government deception about what truly threatens society , be sure to check out Deception.news .

(Natural News) If you’re curious how many people are dying from things that the government claims are “safe and effective,” look no further than the Pharma Death Clock website, which explains that more than 20 million people have died from chemotherapy alone since the year 2000.
As it turns out, the chemical cocktails manufactured by Big Pharma kill orders of magnitude more people than world wars and acts of terrorism combined, which makes the pharmaceutical industry the number-one killer in our world today.
Since the year 2000, nearly 2.25 million people have died from taking opioid pharmaceuticals, even as the cannabis plant remains federally outlawed and kratom (mitragyna speciose), a natural alternative to opioids, is under constant attack by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Antibiotic-resistant superbugs, which were spawned by Big Pharma’s death “medicines,” have also killed more than 14 million people since the year 2000, while psychiatric drugs have killed more than 10 million people.
Another top killer of people in the world today is general medicine and its associated approved treatments. Iatrogenic deaths, as these are also called, clock in at nearly 16 million people since the year 2000.
Other prominent causes of death in our world today include hospital errors at nearly nine million deaths since 2000, drug-resistant tuberculosis at more than four million deaths, bedsores at nearly 2.5 million deaths, hospital malnutrition at nearly 2.2 million deaths, adverse drug reactions at nearly 2.2 million deaths, medical errors at nearly two millions deaths, hospital infections at more than 1.5 million deaths, and SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) at nearly one million deaths.
Sponsored: NEW Biostructured Silver First Aid Gel created by the Health Ranger combines three types of silver (ionic silver, colloidal silver, biostructured silver) with seven potent botanicals (rosemary, oregano, cinnamon and more) to create a breakthrough first aid silver gel. Over 50 ppm silver, verified via ICP-MS lab analysis. Made from 100% Texas rain water and 70% solar power. Zero chemical preservatives, fragrances or emulsifiers. See full details here.
The list goes on and on, and you can peruse it yourself at PharmaDeathClock.com.
If the government says it’s bad, then it’s probably good – and vice versa
The point, here, is that the number-one killer of humans is government-sanctioned “medicine” and all of its associated parts – not vapes, raw milk, plants, guns, or any of the other things that nanny state tyrants and the agencies that they control claim are destroying society.
“Conservatives” are notorious for demanding that the government ban this herb or that plant in order to “protect the children” and “our communities” from “harm.” Liberals, as we know, do the exact same thing, except it’s usually aimed at firearms or speech.
Nevertheless, the common thread is that everyone is focused on the wrong things when it comes to truly keeping our communities safe. If people really care about others’ well-being, then the first thing we need to eliminate from our streets are CVS and Walgreens stores on every corner, and hospital compounds in every city.
As it turns out, these are the poison dispensaries responsible for destroying human lives in a variety of ways, including with deadly drugs, infectious filth, and hospital errors. So, where are the protests to have the FDA and CDC crack down on these institutions for destroying families?
Instead, all we ever hear about is the “need” to eliminate our freedoms and liberties in order to keep everyone “safe.” That means no cannabis, no kratom, no raw milk, no clean food that’s sold without a “permit,” no free speech, no guns, and basically no self-autonomy – because only the government knows what’s best for you and your family.
“No matter how much the Pentagon bombs Middle Eastern terrorists, the truth is that America’s mental health is being chemically carpet bombed every single day that Big Pharma is allowed to advertise on television, directly to consumers,” writes Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, comparing death by pharmaceuticals to death by drone strikes.
For more related news about government deception about what truly threatens society, be sure to check out Deception.news.
Sources for this article include:
PharmaDeathClock.com
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-01-12--Tesla vehicles are now committing homicide on the streets of America. Why isn't the corporation bein

Tesla vehicles are now committing homicide on the streets of America. Why isn't the corporation being held responsible?

( Natural News ) A few days into the new year it was reported that yet another Tesla car had gotten into a serious accident , smashing into a moving vehicle at a “ high rate of speed ” before its highly flammable battery suddenly burst into flames .
The incident took place in Salt Lake City , and while some news reports are saying that the Tesla driver may have been drunk – he supposedly ran a red light going about 122 miles per hour – Salt Lake Police Lieutenant Brett Olsen told Deseret News early on that impairment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crash.
” This statement led still other news outlets to speculate as to whether Tesla ’ s “ autopilot ” function may have played a role in this latest horrific tragedy , seeing as how roughly one year ago a rogue Tesla veered off the highway in New Jersey and plowed into several objects as a result of faulty autopilot programming .
Fifty-year-old Sarina Astorga , the driver of the Nissan sedan that was struck by the out-of-control Tesla in Salt Lake City , was reportedly rushed to the hospital in critical condition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , while the driver of the Tesla was last reported as being in “ critical condition.
” “ I heard this big , loud boom and I turn around and this black car in the middle of the intersection , I saw it come flying at me , ” local bystander Danny Hill told Fox13Now about the Tesla .
“ I saw the brake shoes , wheel wall come straight at me , so I actually had to start running a little bit to avoid getting hit.
” Sponsored solution from the Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filter removes almost 100 % of all contaminants using only the power of gravity ( no electricity needed , works completely off-grid ) .
Widely consider the ultimate `` survival '' water filter , the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs , with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams .
Explore more here .
Lt. Olsen told the same news outlet that he observed debris from the Tesla “ scattered up to a block away , ” adding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impact.
” Sarina ’ s family has since set up a fundraiser page to help cover the costs for her funeral arrangements .
As it turns out , Sarina ’ s death marks the 15th death caused by a Tesla , the 14th resulting from another horrific crash that took place on December 29 in Indiana .
Reports indicate that this prior incident involved a Tesla Model 3 that , just like in New Jersey , had been running on autopilot before colliding with a parked fire truck .
This string of deadly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) to launch an investigation into these death traps , which some news outlets are now referring to as inanimate serial killers .
For all intents and purposes , Tesla cars are proving themselves to be homicidal maniac vehicles and if they don ’ t kill their drivers and passengers upon impact , then their exploding batteries will finish the job .
The NHTSA has since issued a public “ advisory ” warning to Tesla owners that they should always “ keep their hands on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ times ” – in other words , don ’ t ever rely on the so-called autopilot function to get you to your destination safely .
However , Tesla itself has borne none of the brunt of all this carnage , and neither has its owner Elon Musk .
Wealthy Americans continue to purchase these elitist vehicles believing them to be better for the environment , and Musk is reaping windfall profits , even as people continue to die from these deadly vehicles .
“ Why are these cars even allowed on the streets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in response to this latest news out of Salt Lake City .
“ The liability is incredible .
Even a lawnmower can ’ t be sold without kill switches and backup blade shut-offs .
Who is allowing this ?
Is the taxpayer subsidizing Tesla ’ s production ?
Tesla has been selling their own insurance in California for over a year , is the insurance also being subsidized by the taxpayer ?
” For more related news about the hoax that is Tesla , be sure to check out Deception.news .

(Natural News) A few days into the new year it was reported that yet another Tesla car had gotten into a serious accident, smashing into a moving vehicle at a “high rate of speed” before its highly flammable battery suddenly burst into flames.
The incident took place in Salt Lake City, and while some news reports are saying that the Tesla driver may have been drunk – he supposedly ran a red light going about 122 miles per hour – Salt Lake Police Lieutenant Brett Olsen told Deseret News early on that impairment “was not immediately suspected in the crash.”
This statement led still other news outlets to speculate as to whether Tesla’s “autopilot” function may have played a role in this latest horrific tragedy, seeing as how roughly one year ago a rogue Tesla veered off the highway in New Jersey and plowed into several objects as a result of faulty autopilot programming.
Fifty-year-old Sarina Astorga, the driver of the Nissan sedan that was struck by the out-of-control Tesla in Salt Lake City, was reportedly rushed to the hospital in critical condition after the crash. She later died, while the driver of the Tesla was last reported as being in “critical condition.”
“I heard this big, loud boom and I turn around and this black car in the middle of the intersection, I saw it come flying at me,” local bystander Danny Hill told Fox13Now about the Tesla. “I saw the brake shoes, wheel wall come straight at me, so I actually had to start running a little bit to avoid getting hit.”
Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate "survival" water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.
Lt. Olsen told the same news outlet that he observed debris from the Tesla “scattered up to a block away,” adding that “it was a pretty significant impact.” Sarina’s family has since set up a fundraiser page to help cover the costs for her funeral arrangements.
Tesla cars are serial killers, warns news outlet
As it turns out, Sarina’s death marks the 15th death caused by a Tesla, the 14th resulting from another horrific crash that took place on December 29 in Indiana. Reports indicate that this prior incident involved a Tesla Model 3 that, just like in New Jersey, had been running on autopilot before colliding with a parked fire truck.
This string of deadly incidents involving Tesla cars has prompted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to launch an investigation into these death traps, which some news outlets are now referring to as inanimate serial killers.
For all intents and purposes, Tesla cars are proving themselves to be homicidal maniac vehicles and if they don’t kill their drivers and passengers upon impact, then their exploding batteries will finish the job.
The NHTSA has since issued a public “advisory” warning to Tesla owners that they should always “keep their hands on the steering wheel and pay attention at all times” – in other words, don’t ever rely on the so-called autopilot function to get you to your destination safely.
However, Tesla itself has borne none of the brunt of all this carnage, and neither has its owner Elon Musk. Wealthy Americans continue to purchase these elitist vehicles believing them to be better for the environment, and Musk is reaping windfall profits, even as people continue to die from these deadly vehicles.
“Why are these cars even allowed on the streets?” asked one Zero Hedge commenter in response to this latest news out of Salt Lake City.
“The liability is incredible. Even a lawnmower can’t be sold without kill switches and backup blade shut-offs. Who is allowing this? Is the taxpayer subsidizing Tesla’s production? Tesla has been selling their own insurance in California for over a year, is the insurance also being subsidized by the taxpayer?”
For more related news about the hoax that is Tesla, be sure to check out Deception.news.
Sources for this article include:
ZeroHedge.com
Fox13Now.com
KSL.com
NaturalNews.com
AutoNews.com
EricPetersAutos.com


naturalnews--2020-01-12--One of America's largest milk producers just filed for bankruptcy as consumers switch to non-dairy b

One of America's largest milk producers just filed for bankruptcy as consumers switch to non-dairy beverages

( Natural News ) Americans have a message for the commercial dairy industry and it ’ s not what these processed milk lords want to hear : Give us raw or plant-based , or we ’ re not buying it .
This growing trend away from pasteurized , homogenized milk recently sent Dean Foods , the largest milk processor in America , into bankruptcy .
And not long after that , Borden Dairy , another major milk processor , also filed for Chapter 11 .
Since processed milk contains none of the enzymes needed to digest it – including lactase @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – people simply aren ’ t buying it anymore because they ’ re tired of feeling ill all the time .
Instead , they ’ re opting for fresh raw milk , assuming it ’ s “ legal ” in their state , or nut-based milk alternatives , which is killing off the commercial dairy industry .
While it might seem like a negative thing for our economy , this commercial dairy die-off is actually a good thing because it could pave the way for dairy products as they were meant to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ full of enzymes and beneficial probiotic bacteria – to finally become legal again .
Much like how cannabis ( marijuana ) was outlawed in the 1930s , raw milk was similarly outlawed across large swaths of the United States at the turn of the 20th century .
Because some people were getting sick from dirty raw milk , the government decided to just ban all of it , making it extremely difficult for people who prefer the real thing to obtain it .
Enter the commercial dairy industry , which blossomed for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the toilet , as it should , due to widespread lactose intolerance and simple disgust for the unknown , highly processed contents of those ubiquitous jugs on grocery store shelves .
Simply put , Americans don ’ t want processed dairy anymore , so this behemoth industry is crumbling before our very eyes .
And Borden knows this full well , admitting in its bankruptcy filing that Americans are choosing safer and more easily digestible alternatives .
How many other companies in failing industries are on the verge of filing for bankruptcy ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Borden will continue with business as usual .
This is simply a reorganization effort that aims to eliminate Borden ’ s “ unsustainable ” debt , according to the company .
But it is our assessment that “ business as usual ” will only continue for so long before eventually Borden , Dean , and these other companies are forced to close their doors entirely due to plummeting demand .
If people don ’ t want processed milk , which they don ’ t , then these companies will eventually bite the dust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ processed dairy in the U.S. has declined by about six percent .
Over the past 18 months , a shocking 2,730 dairy farms have gone out of business .
Meanwhile , demand for plant-based milk alternatives and clean , raw milk from local farms is skyrocketing .
“ Unfortunately , the parties were unable to finalize and implement an out-of-court restructuring by the forbearance termination date , and the lenders were unwilling to extend such date further and provide necessary liquidity , ” stated Jason Monaco , the chief financial officer of Borden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ initiate a court-supervised bankruptcy instead .
Responding to the news at Freight Waves , one commenter noted that most big shippers “ are swimming in huge piles of debt as are many large brokers and carriers.
” It is his opinion that there ’ s an impending “ tsunami of bankruptcies ” that “ will be absolutely breathtaking to all that are watching.
” “ Debt is the devil ’ s surprise for us all , ” he further added , offering advice to others .
“ Just watch – and know who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t bring you down .
Question number one should always be ‘ are you profitable ’ quickly followed by ‘ how much debt is on your balance sheet.
’ Ask your customers AND your vendors before it ’ s too late.
” For more related news about the collapse of major industries like milk processing , be sure to check out Collapse.news .

(Natural News) Americans have a message for the commercial dairy industry and it’s not what these processed milk lords want to hear: Give us raw or plant-based, or we’re not buying it.
This growing trend away from pasteurized, homogenized milk recently sent Dean Foods, the largest milk processor in America, into bankruptcy. And not long after that, Borden Dairy, another major milk processor, also filed for Chapter 11.
Since processed milk contains none of the enzymes needed to digest it – including lactase, which is necessary to digest lactose – people simply aren’t buying it anymore because they’re tired of feeling ill all the time. Instead, they’re opting for fresh raw milk, assuming it’s “legal” in their state, or nut-based milk alternatives, which is killing off the commercial dairy industry.
While it might seem like a negative thing for our economy, this commercial dairy die-off is actually a good thing because it could pave the way for dairy products as they were meant to be consumed – fresh, raw, and full of enzymes and beneficial probiotic bacteria – to finally become legal again.
Much like how cannabis (marijuana) was outlawed in the 1930s, raw milk was similarly outlawed across large swaths of the United States at the turn of the 20th century. Because some people were getting sick from dirty raw milk, the government decided to just ban all of it, making it extremely difficult for people who prefer the real thing to obtain it.
Enter the commercial dairy industry, which blossomed for a good while after that before now swirling the toilet, as it should, due to widespread lactose intolerance and simple disgust for the unknown, highly processed contents of those ubiquitous jugs on grocery store shelves.
Sponsored: NEW Biostructured Silver First Aid Gel created by the Health Ranger combines three types of silver (ionic silver, colloidal silver, biostructured silver) with seven potent botanicals (rosemary, oregano, cinnamon and more) to create a breakthrough first aid silver gel. Over 50 ppm silver, verified via ICP-MS lab analysis. Made from 100% Texas rain water and 70% solar power. Zero chemical preservatives, fragrances or emulsifiers. See full details here.
Simply put, Americans don’t want processed dairy anymore, so this behemoth industry is crumbling before our very eyes. And Borden knows this full well, admitting in its bankruptcy filing that Americans are choosing safer and more easily digestible alternatives.
How many other companies in failing industries are on the verge of filing for bankruptcy?
It’s important to note that Borden will continue with business as usual. This is simply a reorganization effort that aims to eliminate Borden’s “unsustainable” debt, according to the company.
But it is our assessment that “business as usual” will only continue for so long before eventually Borden, Dean, and these other companies are forced to close their doors entirely due to plummeting demand. If people don’t want processed milk, which they don’t, then these companies will eventually bite the dust entirely.
Since 2015, consumption of processed dairy in the U.S. has declined by about six percent. Over the past 18 months, a shocking 2,730 dairy farms have gone out of business. Meanwhile, demand for plant-based milk alternatives and clean, raw milk from local farms is skyrocketing.
“Unfortunately, the parties were unable to finalize and implement an out-of-court restructuring by the forbearance termination date, and the lenders were unwilling to extend such date further and provide necessary liquidity,” stated Jason Monaco, the chief financial officer of Borden, about why the company chose to initiate a court-supervised bankruptcy instead.
Responding to the news at Freight Waves, one commenter noted that most big shippers “are swimming in huge piles of debt as are many large brokers and carriers.” It is his opinion that there’s an impending “tsunami of bankruptcies” that “will be absolutely breathtaking to all that are watching.”
“Debt is the devil’s surprise for us all,” he further added, offering advice to others. “Just watch – and know who you are dealing with so they don’t bring you down. Question number one should always be ‘are you profitable’ quickly followed by ‘how much debt is on your balance sheet.’ Ask your customers AND your vendors before it’s too late.”
For more related news about the collapse of major industries like milk processing, be sure to check out Collapse.news.
Sources for this article include:
NaturalNews.com
FreightWaves.com
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-01-12--John McAfee just withdrew his famous 2020 prediction about Bitcoin, now says the cryptocurrency is e

John McAfee just withdrew his famous 2020 prediction about Bitcoin, now says the cryptocurrency is essentially obsolete

( Natural News ) There was a time when John McAfee of antivirus fame predicted that Bitcoin would reach $ 1 million by 2020 .
But he ’ s since changed his mind and decided that Bitcoin will eventually reach $ 0 because the cryptocurrency is based on “ ancient ” technology .
Part of McAfee ’ s former $ 1 million claim included a personal promise ; if it didn ’ t “ shoot the moon , ” then McAfee was going to remove his genitalia .
But now McAfee claims that this was all just a ploy for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intended to do this .
Though McAfee founded one of the largest cybersecurity firms back in 1987 , he ’ s now on the run from authorities .
And during a rare interview he gave from an anonymous location recently , McAfee told all about his “ adventures , ” as well as his newfound opinions on Bitcoin .
“ Bitcoin was first , ” McAfee wrote in a recent tweet disavowing the cryptocurrency that he once hailed .
“ It ’ s an ancient technology .
All know it .
Newer blockchains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apps and more .
Bitcoin is our future ?
Was the Model T the future of the automobile ?
” Back in May , McAfee endorsed Dogecoin , a newer cryptocurrency that he likes because of its name , apparently .
Just a few months later in August , McAfee warned his Twitter followers not to bail on Bitcoin because , “ You know in your heart Bitcoin can not lose.
” So , McAfee really is kind of all over the place when it comes to Bitcoin and the cryptosphere , endorsing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next .
Reports indicate that he also has a history of accepting cash to pump altcoins , which one source indicates has given him an incentive to bash Bitcoin .
Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store : The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100 % of all contaminants using only the power of gravity ( no electricity needed , works completely off-grid ) .
Widely consider the ultimate `` survival '' water filter , the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tests personally conducted by Mike Adams .
Explore more here .
For more related news about the collapse of Bitcoin , be sure to check out BitRaped.com .
Bitcoin is on the way out McAfee did , however , blow the lid on Bitcoin back in 2017 when he admitted that Bitcoin is centered around artificial work , even while attempting to endorse it .
During an interview with Jamie Dimon , McAfee stated that it costs “ over one thousand dollars per coin to create a Bitcoin , ” and that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mining .
Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , described this as a computation wheel spinning operation where the Bitcoin algorithm contains artificial and needless complexity designed to make Bitcoin mining more difficult than it otherwise needs to be .
At one point in time , it only cost about a penny to mine Bitcoin , yet now it costs more than $ 1,000 , which begs the question as to why this is the case .
Adams chalks it up to Bitcoin ’ s artificial work algorithm , which creates pointless “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vast amounts of electricity and computational resources to engage in pointless mathematical work that achieves nothing that matters in the real world .
It turns out that Adams realized Bitcoin was obsolete years before McAfee came to the same realization .
“ Bitcoin was a proof-of-concept project , but it was never built for massive scalability , ” Adams warned in a 2018 podcast .
“ The very structure of blockchain is a severe bottleneck for processing large numbers of transactions , and the blockchain ledger storage requirements very quickly explode beyond practicality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Adams , who supports the overall concept of cryptocurrency and decentralized money systems , says Bitcoin ’ s mining requirements have already made it not only obsolete , but also one of the largest sources of electricity consumption in some cities where mining operations are based .
This electricity is being spent heating CPUs but “ achieving nothing practical or even necessary , ” warns Adams .
So , in many ways , both Adams and McAfee are right : Bitcoin is ancient in that it ’ s not a financially viable cryptocurrency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lacks features of scalability and functionality that have now become common in other , competing cryptocurrencies .
“ On top of all that , Bitcoin is clearly not a store of value , and recent research by Princeton scientists found that Bitcoin isn ’ t anonymous , either , ” Adams goes on to warn .
To keep up with the latest news about Bitcoin , be sure to check out BitcoinCrash.news .

(Natural News) There was a time when John McAfee of antivirus fame predicted that Bitcoin would reach $1 million by 2020. But he’s since changed his mind and decided that Bitcoin will eventually reach $0 because the cryptocurrency is based on “ancient” technology.
Part of McAfee’s former $1 million claim included a personal promise; if it didn’t “shoot the moon,” then McAfee was going to remove his genitalia. But now McAfee claims that this was all just a ploy for attention, and that he never actually intended to do this.
Though McAfee founded one of the largest cybersecurity firms back in 1987, he’s now on the run from authorities. And during a rare interview he gave from an anonymous location recently, McAfee told all about his “adventures,” as well as his newfound opinions on Bitcoin.
“Bitcoin was first,” McAfee wrote in a recent tweet disavowing the cryptocurrency that he once hailed. “It’s an ancient technology. All know it. Newer blockchains have privacy, smart contracts, distributed apps and more. Bitcoin is our future? Was the Model T the future of the automobile?”
Back in May, McAfee endorsed Dogecoin, a newer cryptocurrency that he likes because of its name, apparently. Just a few months later in August, McAfee warned his Twitter followers not to bail on Bitcoin because, “You know in your heart Bitcoin cannot lose.”
So, McAfee really is kind of all over the place when it comes to Bitcoin and the cryptosphere, endorsing one crypto one day and another the next. Reports indicate that he also has a history of accepting cash to pump altcoins, which one source indicates has given him an incentive to bash Bitcoin.
Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate "survival" water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.
For more related news about the collapse of Bitcoin, be sure to check out BitRaped.com.
Bitcoin is on the way out
McAfee did, however, blow the lid on Bitcoin back in 2017 when he admitted that Bitcoin is centered around artificial work, even while attempting to endorse it.
During an interview with Jamie Dimon, McAfee stated that it costs “over one thousand dollars per coin to create a Bitcoin,” and that the process involves “proof of work” mining. Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, described this as a computation wheel spinning operation where the Bitcoin algorithm contains artificial and needless complexity designed to make Bitcoin mining more difficult than it otherwise needs to be.
At one point in time, it only cost about a penny to mine Bitcoin, yet now it costs more than $1,000, which begs the question as to why this is the case. Adams chalks it up to Bitcoin’s artificial work algorithm, which creates pointless “computation difficulty” for miners, consuming vast amounts of electricity and computational resources to engage in pointless mathematical work that achieves nothing that matters in the real world.
It turns out that Adams realized Bitcoin was obsolete years before McAfee came to the same realization.
“Bitcoin was a proof-of-concept project, but it was never built for massive scalability,” Adams warned in a 2018 podcast. “The very structure of blockchain is a severe bottleneck for processing large numbers of transactions, and the blockchain ledger storage requirements very quickly explode beyond practicality if the currency becomes widely adopted.”
Adams, who supports the overall concept of cryptocurrency and decentralized money systems, says Bitcoin’s mining requirements have already made it not only obsolete, but also one of the largest sources of electricity consumption in some cities where mining operations are based. This electricity is being spent heating CPUs but “achieving nothing practical or even necessary,” warns Adams.
So, in many ways, both Adams and McAfee are right: Bitcoin is ancient in that it’s not a financially viable cryptocurrency in the long run, and it lacks features of scalability and functionality that have now become common in other, competing cryptocurrencies.
“On top of all that, Bitcoin is clearly not a store of value, and recent research by Princeton scientists found that Bitcoin isn’t anonymous, either,” Adams goes on to warn.
To keep up with the latest news about Bitcoin, be sure to check out BitcoinCrash.news.
Sources for this article include:
CCN.com
NaturalNews.com


naturalnews--2020-01-12--Why do over 80% of older Americans consider themselves "healthy" despite chronic illness?

( Natural News ) A National Health Interview Survey found that 82 percent of American adults between the ages of 65 and 74 rated their health as either “ excellent , ” “ very good ” or “ good ” despite the fact that around 60 percent of older Americans are managing two or more chronic conditions .
The National Health Interview Survey was administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .
According to their data , only 18 percent of participants described their health as either “ fair ” or “ poor.
” However , this totally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Prevention and Health Promotion , which states that roughly 60 percent of adults over the age of 65 are battling at least two chronic conditions such as high blood pressure , heart disease , bronchitis or emphysema , diabetes , Alzheimer ’ s disease and cancer .
Older adults may be thinking differently about their health The disparity lies in what older adults perceive as “ good health.
” For many people , this means not being burdened by either an illness or a disability .
However , for seniors , poor physical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they consider more important are vitality , healthy emotional well-being , having positive social relationships , remaining active and being generally satisfied with life .
Lorelei Goldman , 80 , of Evanston , Ill. said : “ Being healthy means being able to continue doing what I like : going to the theater , organizing programs , enjoying the arts , walking.
” She has described her health as “ good ” despite having gone through ovarian and breast cancer .
“ I have all my faculties and good , longtime friendships , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she is sleeping well and that she is involved in a lot of activities that make her feel “ sustained ” and bring her both clarity and joy .
Goldman ’ s metrics for what constitutes “ good health ” are different from that of younger adults , who may measure their ideal health as closer to the norm of “ there shouldn ’ t be anything wrong with me.
” These standards seem to change as people get older .
Self-perception is more than just wishful thinking Many researchers have noted that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of longevity , even if many of those who claim to be in good health are dealing with one or more chronic conditions .
Good cognitive health and use and access to healthcare services are also good factors for long life .
( Related : Unlocking longevity : What do people who live to 100 have in common ? )
Ellen Idler of Emory University and Yael Benyamini of Tel Aviv University were one of the first researchers to highlight the association between self-rated health and mortality in their article published in 1997 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Behavior .
In an interview , Benyamini offered two possible explanations for the disparity between actual health and self-rated health .
Firstly , Benyamini suggested that a person ’ s body may be able to tolerate more than what doctors may recommend .
A person with diabetes , angina and osteoarthritis may get used to these conditions and find a way to live with them without them greatly affecting their quality of life .
Secondly , people who feel healthy , even if they carry an illness or condition , may be more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care of themselves better .
This means that simply “ feeling healthy ” may be enough to help people survive .
There are still some dark spots when it comes to self-rated health .
For example , African Americans , Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans with lower levels of either income or education are less likely to rate their health positively as they age .
Younger women may also perceive their health more negatively than men of a similar age , and a person ’ s mental health also factors in heavily to @ @ @

(Natural News) A National Health Interview Survey found that 82 percent of American adults between the ages of 65 and 74 rated their health as either “excellent,” “very good” or “good” despite the fact that around 60 percent of older Americans are managing two or more chronic conditions.
The National Health Interview Survey was administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to their data, only 18 percent of participants described their health as either “fair” or “poor.” However, this totally contradicts data from the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, which states that roughly 60 percent of adults over the age of 65 are battling at least two chronic conditions such as high blood pressure, heart disease, bronchitis or emphysema, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease and cancer.
Older adults may be thinking differently about their health
The disparity lies in what older adults perceive as “good health.” For many people, this means not being burdened by either an illness or a disability. However, for seniors, poor physical function is less important. The factors they consider more important are vitality, healthy emotional well-being, having positive social relationships, remaining active and being generally satisfied with life.
Lorelei Goldman, 80, of Evanston, Ill. said: “Being healthy means being able to continue doing what I like: going to the theater, organizing programs, enjoying the arts, walking.” She has described her health as “good” despite having gone through ovarian and breast cancer.
Sponsored: NEW Biostructured Silver First Aid Gel created by the Health Ranger combines three types of silver (ionic silver, colloidal silver, biostructured silver) with seven potent botanicals (rosemary, oregano, cinnamon and more) to create a breakthrough first aid silver gel. Over 50 ppm silver, verified via ICP-MS lab analysis. Made from 100% Texas rain water and 70% solar power. Zero chemical preservatives, fragrances or emulsifiers. See full details here.
“I have all my faculties and good, longtime friendships,” continued Goldman. She said that she is sleeping well and that she is involved in a lot of activities that make her feel “sustained” and bring her both clarity and joy.
Goldman’s metrics for what constitutes “good health” are different from that of younger adults, who may measure their ideal health as closer to the norm of “there shouldn’t be anything wrong with me.” These standards seem to change as people get older.
Self-perception is more than just wishful thinking
Many researchers have noted that self-rated health can be a good predictor of longevity, even if many of those who claim to be in good health are dealing with one or more chronic conditions. Good cognitive health and use and access to healthcare services are also good factors for long life. (Related: Unlocking longevity: What do people who live to 100 have in common?)
Ellen Idler of Emory University and Yael Benyamini of Tel Aviv University were one of the first researchers to highlight the association between self-rated health and mortality in their article published in 1997 in the Journal of Health and Social Behavior.
In an interview, Benyamini offered two possible explanations for the disparity between actual health and self-rated health.
Firstly, Benyamini suggested that a person’s body may be able to tolerate more than what doctors may recommend. A person with diabetes, angina and osteoarthritis may get used to these conditions and find a way to live with them without them greatly affecting their quality of life.
Secondly, people who feel healthy, even if they carry an illness or condition, may be more likely to be physically active and take care of themselves better. This means that simply “feeling healthy” may be enough to help people survive.
There are still some dark spots when it comes to self-rated health. For example, African Americans, Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans with lower levels of either income or education are less likely to rate their health positively as they age. Younger women may also perceive their health more negatively than men of a similar age, and a person’s mental health also factors in heavily to self-rated health.
Sources include:
DailyMail.co.uk
HealthyPeople.gov
KHN.org
JSTOR.org
Journals.SagePub.com


naturalnews--2020-01-12--Active duty Army personnel have worse heart health than civilians: Action must be taken to help sold

Active duty Army personnel have worse heart health than civilians: Action must be taken to help soldiers become heart-healthy, note scientists

( Natural News ) Soldiers are regarded as some of the most physically fit individuals , as their occupation demands for them to be at peak health conditions .
However , a study published in the Journal of the American Heart Association reveals that a smaller proportion of active US Army personnel have ideal cardiovascular health compared to the civilian population .
The recent research points out that less than one-third of soldiers who participated in the study had ideal blood pressure compared to about half of civilians who were tested .
Researchers evaluated a group of 263,000 active-duty US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 64 who had a health examination in 2012 , and a similar group of American civilians .
These civilians participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey administered between 2011 and 2012 .
The findings stood in contrast with the study ’ s initial assumptions .
The researchers expected the soldiers to have ideal heart health due to the Army ’ s regular health screenings and emphasis on the physical condition of their soldiers .
( Related : Low intake of fresh fruits and vegetables linked to cardiovascular death : Following @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) These groups were evaluated under four guiding criteria : weight , blood pressure , current rate of tobacco smoking and diabetes .
These components represented four out of the seven possible health factors that the American Heart Association ( AHA ) considers when gauging for ideal cardiovascular health .
They were unable to assess three other metrics – total blood cholesterol , diet and physical activity – due to the Army providing insufficient data .
Each of the four factors that could be tested was classified as either poor , intermediate or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the researchers by the AHA .
Mother Nature 's micronutrient secret : Organic Broccoli Sprout Capsules now available , delivering 280mg of high-density nutrition , including the extraordinary `` sulforaphane '' and `` glucosinolate '' nutrients found only in cruciferous healing foods .
Every lot laboratory tested .
See availability here .
The survey showed that , overall , a greater proportion of the Army personnel got a score of ideal when it came to diabetes and smoking tobacco .
Researchers were quick to point out that the difference when it came to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ came when they evaluated blood pressure .
Only an estimated 30 percent of soldiers had ideal blood pressure compared to 55 percent of civilians .
This is very surprising considering that the US Army ’ s initial screening prohibits potential recruits with elevated blood pressure levels from enlisting .
“ Ideal weight and blood pressure metrics were strikingly low in both active duty personnel and civilians , ” said Loryana L. Vie , study author and professor at the University of Pennsylvania .
Her research found that only a third of both the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weight and that about 20 percent of both groups were active tobacco smokers .
Wake-up call for health in the Army Vie herself was very surprised by these results , believing that the the Army group would score better in terms of their health due to the higher fitness standards required to get into the Army and the need to maintain your strength while serving .
Their metrics were no better when the groups were divided by age categories .
For every single age group the researchers evaluated , the civilian population showed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ideal cardiovascular health in all four criteria .
However , the overall rates were still quite low .
The millennial generation , in particular , scored pretty low , with only 16 percent of civilians and 10 percent of Army personnel between the ages of 17 and 29 receiving an ideal score in all four categories .
Darwin R. Labarthe , another senior author and professor from Northwestern University , has said that their research could help the Army identify a point of concern when it comes to the health of their soldiers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for them to better evaluate their people .
Furthermore , he said that this study will recommend further research that focuses on addressing possible lapses in Army nutrition , as well as analyzing the effects of deployment experience on troop health .
“ Ultimately , we need to help our soldiers become heart healthy .
”

(Natural News) Soldiers are regarded as some of the most physically fit individuals, as their occupation demands for them to be at peak health conditions. However, a study published in the Journal of the American Heart Association reveals that a smaller proportion of active US Army personnel have ideal cardiovascular health compared to the civilian population. The recent research points out that less than one-third of soldiers who participated in the study had ideal blood pressure compared to about half of civilians who were tested.
Researchers evaluated a group of 263,000 active-duty US Army personnel between the ages of 17 and 64 who had a health examination in 2012, and a similar group of American civilians. These civilians participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey administered between 2011 and 2012.
The findings stood in contrast with the study’s initial assumptions. The researchers expected the soldiers to have ideal heart health due to the Army’s regular health screenings and emphasis on the physical condition of their soldiers. (Related: Low intake of fresh fruits and vegetables linked to cardiovascular death: Following a balanced diet boosts heart health.)
Gauging ideal heart health
These groups were evaluated under four guiding criteria: weight, blood pressure, current rate of tobacco smoking and diabetes. These components represented four out of the seven possible health factors that the American Heart Association (AHA) considers when gauging for ideal cardiovascular health. They were unable to assess three other metrics – total blood cholesterol, diet and physical activity – due to the Army providing insufficient data. Each of the four factors that could be tested was classified as either poor, intermediate or ideal according to the criteria given to the researchers by the AHA.
Sponsored: NEW Biostructured Silver First Aid Gel created by the Health Ranger combines three types of silver (ionic silver, colloidal silver, biostructured silver) with seven potent botanicals (rosemary, oregano, cinnamon and more) to create a breakthrough first aid silver gel. Over 50 ppm silver, verified via ICP-MS lab analysis. Made from 100% Texas rain water and 70% solar power. Zero chemical preservatives, fragrances or emulsifiers. See full details here.
The survey showed that, overall, a greater proportion of the Army personnel got a score of ideal when it came to diabetes and smoking tobacco. Researchers were quick to point out that the difference when it came to smoking was minimal. The biggest disparity came when they evaluated blood pressure. Only an estimated 30 percent of soldiers had ideal blood pressure compared to 55 percent of civilians. This is very surprising considering that the US Army’s initial screening prohibits potential recruits with elevated blood pressure levels from enlisting.
“Ideal weight and blood pressure metrics were strikingly low in both active duty personnel and civilians,” said Loryana L. Vie, study author and professor at the University of Pennsylvania. Her research found that only a third of both the Army and the civilian groups had ideal weight and that about 20 percent of both groups were active tobacco smokers.
Wake-up call for health in the Army
Vie herself was very surprised by these results, believing that the the Army group would score better in terms of their health due to the higher fitness standards required to get into the Army and the need to maintain your strength while serving.
Their metrics were no better when the groups were divided by age categories. For every single age group the researchers evaluated, the civilian population showed a higher percentage of those who had ideal cardiovascular health in all four criteria. However, the overall rates were still quite low.
The millennial generation, in particular, scored pretty low, with only 16 percent of civilians and 10 percent of Army personnel between the ages of 17 and 29 receiving an ideal score in all four categories.
Darwin R. Labarthe, another senior author and professor from Northwestern University, has said that their research could help the Army identify a point of concern when it comes to the health of their soldiers, and that this is a call for them to better evaluate their people. Furthermore, he said that this study will recommend further research that focuses on addressing possible lapses in Army nutrition, as well as analyzing the effects of deployment experience on troop health. “Ultimately, we need to help our soldiers become heart healthy.”
Sources include:
ScienceDaily.com
AHAJournals.org


naturalnews--2020-01-12--Chronic stress is a cancer risk, but vitamin C can help

( Natural News ) Chronic stress , a biological response to emotional pressure and demanding situations over a prolonged period of time , can bring about negative effects on your physical , mental and emotional well-being .
These negative health effects could include a higher risk of heart disease , increased gut problems and even accelerated cognitive impairment .
Now , recent research suggests that chronic stress could trigger a key mechanism that fuels the growth of cancer stem cells that create tumors .
A study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation found that a stress hormone called epinephrine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that favor the growth and spread of breast cancer .
This study is considered the first to demonstrate the effects of chronic stress on cancer stem cell growth , something previous research never specifically focused on .
“ You can kill all the cells you want in a tumor , but if the stem cells , or mother cells , are not killed , then the tumor is going to grow and metastasize .
This is one of the first studies to link chronic stress specifically with the growth of breast cancer stem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of the authors of the study .
Keep your stress levels low to prevent cancer To observe how stress would impact cancer cell growth , an international team of researchers induced chronic stress in mice by placing them in tiny enclosures that significantly restricted their movement .
These mice were stressed for about a week before being split into two groups , with one group designated as the control .
The mice in the control group were moved to much larger and more comfortable cages in order to discontinue the stress .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the other hand , were left by the researchers in their small enclosures for another 30 days .
Following the initial investigation , the researchers found that the mice experiencing chronic stress exhibited behavioral changes that were indicative of depression and anxiety .
These mice also had much larger cancer tumors than their peers in the control group .
In addition , these tumors were growing at a faster rate and were found in greater numbers .
Having demonstrated the associations between chronic stress , enhanced breast cancer stem cell growth and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into how various physiological factors changed in the chronic stress-induced mice .
After a thorough analysis , the researchers closed in on epinephrine as the primary suspect .
They observed that the stressed mice had significantly higher levels of this hormone that the mice in the control group .
Also , the stressed mice that received treatments that inhibited ADRB2 — an epinephrine receptor — had smaller cancer tumors and lesser cancer stem cells .
Next , the researchers aimed to evaluate the significance of their findings .
To do so , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ women diagnosed with breast cancer .
They found that women with higher levels of this stress hormone also had excess lactate dehydrogenase in cancer tumors from breast cancer biopsy samples .
In addition , people who had higher levels of epinephrine also had lower overall survival and disease-free survival compared to those with much lower levels of the stress hormone .
The researchers then conducted a final test to see if they could devise a strategy to block the negative effects of epinephrine on the body .
In laboratory tests on breast cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most promising substance happens to be vitamin C , which blocked lactate dehydrogenase production .
In addition , the researchers observed that cancer tumors shrank after injecting vitamin C into stressed mice .
( Related : Vitamin C helps eliminate chronic disease . )
“ Taken together , these findings show that vitamin C might be a novel and effective therapeutic agent for targeting cancer in patients undergoing chronic stress , ” Liu says .
Find out more about the wonderful health benefits of vitamin C at Nutrients.news .

(Natural News) Chronic stress, a biological response to emotional pressure and demanding situations over a prolonged period of time, can bring about negative effects on your physical, mental and emotional well-being. These negative health effects could include a higher risk of heart disease, increased gut problems and even accelerated cognitive impairment. Now, recent research suggests that chronic stress could trigger a key mechanism that fuels the growth of cancer stem cells that create tumors.
A study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation found that a stress hormone called epinephrine sets off an array of biochemical reactions that favor the growth and spread of breast cancer. This study is considered the first to demonstrate the effects of chronic stress on cancer stem cell growth, something previous research never specifically focused on.
“You can kill all the cells you want in a tumor, but if the stem cells, or mother cells, are not killed, then the tumor is going to grow and metastasize. This is one of the first studies to link chronic stress specifically with the growth of breast cancer stem cells,” said Keith Kelley, one of the authors of the study.
Keep your stress levels low to prevent cancer
To observe how stress would impact cancer cell growth, an international team of researchers induced chronic stress in mice by placing them in tiny enclosures that significantly restricted their movement. These mice were stressed for about a week before being split into two groups, with one group designated as the control. The mice in the control group were moved to much larger and more comfortable cages in order to discontinue the stress. The mice in the other group, on the other hand, were left by the researchers in their small enclosures for another 30 days.
The power of the elements: Discover Colloidal Silver Mouthwash with quality, natural ingredients like Sangre de Drago sap, black walnut hulls, menthol crystals and more. Zero artificial sweeteners, colors or alcohol. Learn more at the Health Ranger Store and help support this news site.
Following the initial investigation, the researchers found that the mice experiencing chronic stress exhibited behavioral changes that were indicative of depression and anxiety. These mice also had much larger cancer tumors than their peers in the control group. In addition, these tumors were growing at a faster rate and were found in greater numbers.
Having demonstrated the associations between chronic stress, enhanced breast cancer stem cell growth and chronic stress, the research team looked into how various physiological factors changed in the chronic stress-induced mice. After a thorough analysis, the researchers closed in on epinephrine as the primary suspect.
They observed that the stressed mice had significantly higher levels of this hormone that the mice in the control group. Also, the stressed mice that received treatments that inhibited ADRB2 — an epinephrine receptor — had smaller cancer tumors and lesser cancer stem cells.
Next, the researchers aimed to evaluate the significance of their findings. To do so, they studied the blood epinephrine levels of 83 women diagnosed with breast cancer. They found that women with higher levels of this stress hormone also had excess lactate dehydrogenase in cancer tumors from breast cancer biopsy samples. In addition, people who had higher levels of epinephrine also had lower overall survival and disease-free survival compared to those with much lower levels of the stress hormone.
The researchers then conducted a final test to see if they could devise a strategy to block the negative effects of epinephrine on the body. In laboratory tests on breast cancer cell lines, they found that the most promising substance happens to be vitamin C, which blocked lactate dehydrogenase production. In addition, the researchers observed that cancer tumors shrank after injecting vitamin C into stressed mice. (Related: Vitamin C helps eliminate chronic disease.)
“Taken together, these findings show that vitamin C might be a novel and effective therapeutic agent for targeting cancer in patients undergoing chronic stress,” Liu says.
Find out more about the wonderful health benefits of vitamin C at Nutrients.news.
Sources include:
NaturalHealth365.com
Eurekalert.org
JCI.org


naturalnews--2020-01-12--Canadian LGBT lawyer faces challenge for claiming transgender pronouns are ‘the law’

( Natural News ) A pro-family group in British Columbia has launched a legal complaint against a pro-LGBT lawyer for claiming that “ it ’ s the law ” that people must use the “ preferred pronouns ” of males who now say they ’ re “ female ” and vice versa .
Vancouver lawyer Adrienne Smith “ deceives people into thinking the law compels everyone to use the preferred pronouns of trans-identified individuals , ” asserts Kari Simpson , executive director of pro-family advocacy group Culture Guard , which filed the complaint with the Law Society of British Columbia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ biological woman who identifies as “ non-binary , ” appears in a three-minute 2017 video published in connection with the Canadian Union of Public Employees ( CUPE ) titled “ Why Use Appropriate Pronouns for Transgender People ?
” She identifies herself as a lawyer and CUPE member and claims the most important reason to use “ appropriate ” pronouns is because “ it ’ s the law.
” But that statement “ promulgates a lie that infringes Canadians ’ Charter-protected right to freedom of expression , ” said Simpson in a press @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ no such law exists , either in BC or Canadian statute law , ” said Simpson .
Canadians might think they have to refer to a “ gender fluid person ” by their “ preferred pronouns ” because of confusion over federal Bill C-16 , Simpson told LifeSiteNews .
Passed by Justin Trudeau ’ s Liberal government in June 2017 , Bill C-16 adds “ gender expression ” and “ gender identity ” to Canada ’ s human rights code as prohibited grounds for discrimination , and to the Criminal Code ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — notably Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson — warned the bill would lead to compelled speech .
But Simpson says Bill C-16 does not mandate the use of “ preferred pronouns ” .
“ Definitely , my complaint to the Law Society is about putting that gauntlet down , because there is so much confusion at this point , ” she told LifeSiteNews .
Bill C-16 “ gave the right to people to express themselves or to identify a certain way .
What it doesn ’ t do is require me to change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things , ” Simpson said .
“ The law on the use of pronouns would appear to be unsettled .
Consequently , there is not at this time , a legal requirement that designated pronouns be used , ” she told LifeSiteNews in an email .
“ Neither the BC or Ontario Human Rights Codes make any reference to a requirement that the preferred pronoun chosen by the transgendered person must be adhered to , ” nor does federal Bill C-16 “ make any reference to the use of preferred pronouns , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on transgender cases so far have not settled the issue , she added .
When the BC Human Rights Tribunal ruled in March 2019 that Bill Whatcott violated trans-activist Ronan “ Morgane ” Oger ’ s human rights , “ the issue was whether the flier distributed by Mr. Whatcott exposed Oger to hatred and contempt , ” Landolt explained .
“ The tribunal agreed that it did so .
However , it did not make any ruling on Mr. Whatcott ’ s use of the male term rather than female term when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she said .
The panel “ directed ” Whatcott to “ use ‘ she ’ rather than ‘ he ’ when referring to Oger , ” and Whatcott ’ s consistent refusal to do so “ contributed to the extraordinarily high penalty ” against him , but “ was not part of the panel ’ s judgement on the use of designated pronouns , ” Landolt said .
The tribunal ordered Whatcott to pay Oger $ 55,000 — $ 35,000 in compensation for injury to Oger ’ s “ dignity , feelings and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Whatcott ’ s “ improper ” conduct during and before the hearings .
Ontario ’ s Bill 89 , which was enacted to amend and repeal the Ontario Family Services Act in 2017 , “ did not make any reference to the requirement that preferred pronouns be used , ” Landolt told LifeSiteNews .
Nor does the BC Child , Family , and Community Service Act “ make any reference to preferred pronouns , but Section 37 refers to what constitutes the ‘ best interests of a child ’ and Section 38 lists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” she said .
BC judges used that section to rule earlier this year against the father who was fighting to stop his 14-year-old daughter receiving testosterone shots in her transition to a “ boy ” .
On April 15 , 2019 , BC Supreme Court Justice Francesca Marzari upheld an earlier ruling in her A.B .
vs. C.D .
decision that the father ’ s refusal “ to accept the child ’ s gender change ” — including refusing to use her “ preferred pronouns ” — was “ contrary to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and constituted an ‘ act of violence , ” Landolt said .
Marzari ’ s ruling is under appeal and so is not binding , “ at least until the B.C .
Court of Appeal hands down its decision , ” she said .
The appeals court ruling “ may also be subsequently appealed before the Supreme Court of Canada , where it would then become settled law and become binding , ” she said .
But until then , the law on pronoun use “ would appear to be unsettled , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the law society alleges that Smith violated BC ’ s Legal Professions Act , which requires lawyers to “ uphold the rights of all persons , ” as well as the law society ’ s rule that lawyers not allow outside interests to “ jeopardize ” their “ professional integrity , independence or competence.
” “ Clearly , Smith ’ s political zealotry on matters involving transgenderism and identity politics has jeopardized her competency , ” Simpson said .
And “ demanding that her audience conform to a nonexistent law ” does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extinguishes it.
” Simpson expects the law society will take the matter “ very seriously ” and act on it promptly .
If it dismisses the complaint , Simpson says she ’ ll seek a judicial review in provincial court .
“ This is where we must start standing up and pushing back on these issues , ” she told LifeSiteNews .
“ If we don ’ t want to lose the right to retain logic and biological application to reality , we need to step up right now .
”

(Natural News) A pro-family group in British Columbia has launched a legal complaint against a pro-LGBT lawyer for claiming that “it’s the law” that people must use the “preferred pronouns” of males who now say they’re “female” and vice versa.
(Article by Lianne Laurence republished from LifeSiteNews.com)
Vancouver lawyer Adrienne Smith “deceives people into thinking the law compels everyone to use the preferred pronouns of trans-identified individuals,” asserts Kari Simpson, executive director of pro-family advocacy group Culture Guard, which filed the complaint with the Law Society of British Columbia earlier this month.
Smith, a biological woman who identifies as “non-binary,” appears in a three-minute 2017 video published in connection with the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) titled “Why Use Appropriate Pronouns for Transgender People?”
She identifies herself as a lawyer and CUPE member and claims the most important reason to use “appropriate” pronouns is because “it’s the law.”
But that statement “promulgates a lie that infringes Canadians’ Charter-protected right to freedom of expression,” said Simpson in a press release.
Contrary to what Smith says “no such law exists, either in BC or Canadian statute law,” said Simpson.
Canadians might think they have to refer to a “gender fluid person” by their “preferred pronouns” because of confusion over federal Bill C-16, Simpson told LifeSiteNews.
Passed by Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government in June 2017, Bill C-16 adds “gender expression” and “gender identity” to Canada’s human rights code as prohibited grounds for discrimination, and to the Criminal Code’s hate speech section.
Its critics — notably Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson — warned the bill would lead to compelled speech.
But Simpson says Bill C-16 does not mandate the use of “preferred pronouns”.
“Definitely, my complaint to the Law Society is about putting that gauntlet down, because there is so much confusion at this point,” she told LifeSiteNews.
Bill C-16 “gave the right to people to express themselves or to identify a certain way. What it doesn’t do is require me to change how I’m going to do things,” Simpson said.
REAL Women of Canada and lawyer Gwen Landolt agrees.
“The law on the use of pronouns would appear to be unsettled. Consequently, there is not at this time, a legal requirement that designated pronouns be used,” she told LifeSiteNews in an email.
“Neither the BC or Ontario Human Rights Codes make any reference to a requirement that the preferred pronoun chosen by the transgendered person must be adhered to,” nor does federal Bill C-16 “make any reference to the use of preferred pronouns,” Landolt said.
Moreover, provincial rulings on transgender cases so far have not settled the issue, she added.
When the BC Human Rights Tribunal ruled in March 2019 that Bill Whatcott violated trans-activist Ronan “Morgane” Oger’s human rights, “the issue was whether the flier distributed by Mr. Whatcott exposed Oger to hatred and contempt,” Landolt explained.
“The tribunal agreed that it did so. However, it did not make any ruling on Mr. Whatcott’s use of the male term rather than female term when he referred to complainant Oger,” she said.
The panel “directed” Whatcott to “use ‘she’ rather than ‘he’ when referring to Oger,” and Whatcott’s consistent refusal to do so “contributed to the extraordinarily high penalty” against him, but “was not part of the panel’s judgement on the use of designated pronouns,” Landolt said.
The tribunal ordered Whatcott to pay Oger $55,000 — $35,000 in compensation for injury to Oger’s “dignity, feelings and self-respect,” and $20,000 for Whatcott’s “improper” conduct during and before the hearings.
Ontario’s Bill 89, which was enacted to amend and repeal the Ontario Family Services Act in 2017, “did not make any reference to the requirement that preferred pronouns be used,” Landolt told LifeSiteNews.
Nor does the BC Child, Family, and Community Service Act “make any reference to preferred pronouns, but Section 37 refers to what constitutes the ‘best interests of a child’ and Section 38 lists what constitutes ‘family violence’,” she said.
BC judges used that section to rule earlier this year against the father who was fighting to stop his 14-year-old daughter receiving testosterone shots in her transition to a “boy”.
On April 15, 2019, BC Supreme Court Justice Francesca Marzari upheld an earlier ruling in her A.B. vs. C.D. decision that the father’s refusal “to accept the child’s gender change” — including refusing to use her “preferred pronouns” — was “contrary to the child’s ‘best interest’ and constituted an ‘act of violence,” Landolt said.
Marzari’s ruling is under appeal and so is not binding, “at least until the B.C. Court of Appeal hands down its decision,” she said.
The appeals court ruling “may also be subsequently appealed before the Supreme Court of Canada, where it would then become settled law and become binding,” she said.
But until then, the law on pronoun use “would appear to be unsettled,” Landolt said.
Simpson’s complaint to the law society alleges that Smith violated BC’s Legal Professions Act, which requires lawyers to “uphold the rights of all persons,” as well as the law society’s rule that lawyers not allow outside interests to “jeopardize” their “professional integrity, independence or competence.”
“Clearly, Smith’s political zealotry on matters involving transgenderism and identity politics has jeopardized her competency,” Simpson said.
And “demanding that her audience conform to a nonexistent law” does “more than jeopardize her personal integrity—it extinguishes it.”
Simpson expects the law society will take the matter “very seriously” and act on it promptly.
If it dismisses the complaint, Simpson says she’ll seek a judicial review in provincial court.
“This is where we must start standing up and pushing back on these issues,” she told LifeSiteNews. “If we don’t want to lose the right to retain logic and biological application to reality, we need to step up right now.”
Read more at: LifeSiteNews.com