bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-12--New Paper Shows that Increased Rioting Causes Second Amendment Support to Grow

According to a new paper by George Mason University professor David Bernstein titled “ The Right to Armed Self Defense in the Light of Law Enforcement Abdication ” , more Americans are embracing Second Amendment rights as cities go up in flames .
Cities such as Seattle , which witnessed the establishment of an “ autonomous zone ” , and Chicago , which has been lax in its enforcement against looting and generalized rioting , are some of the most salient examples of urban dysfunction taking place in America .
The latter city has already built a reputation for being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given weekend , Chicago is constantly being hit hard by shootings and other acts of violence .
Even worse , gangs are banding together for the purpose of trying to take out law enforcement .
Trending : Leftie Matthew Doloff Charged With First Degree Murder in Shooting of Patriot Prayer Demonstrator in Denver Smaller cities such as Kenosha , Wisconsin , have also experienced tremendous unrest , in addition to heinous forms of anarcho-tyranny , where the law-abiding are punished for exercising their right to self-defense , while criminals are allowed to run @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continues below The article by Bernstein highlights the institutional failure of law enforcement “ in reaction to looting , rioting , and other forms of illegal behavior that threatened the well-being of the public.
” Bernstein noted that “ many police departments received implicit or explicit orders from their political supervisors to “ stand down ’ .
” Bernstein brought up an interesting point in his abstract about the failures of law enforcement during this period : The Second Amendment exists for a reason .
Not only does it protect individuals from a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mobs that are only encouraged to misbehave and cause unrest thanks to the political irresponsibility of many municipalities .

New Paper Shows that Increased Rioting Causes Second Amendment Support to Grow
According to a new paper by George Mason University professor David Bernstein titled “The Right to Armed Self Defense in the Light of Law Enforcement Abdication”, more Americans are embracing Second Amendment rights as cities go up in flames.
Cities such as Seattle, which witnessed the establishment of an “autonomous zone”, and Chicago, which has been lax in its enforcement against looting and generalized rioting, are some of the most salient examples of urban dysfunction taking place in America.
The latter city has already built a reputation for being a hub of crime. On any given weekend, Chicago is constantly being hit hard by shootings and other acts of violence. Even worse, gangs are banding together for the purpose of trying to take out law enforcement.
Smaller cities such as Kenosha, Wisconsin, have also experienced tremendous unrest, in addition to heinous forms of anarcho-tyranny, where the law-abiding are punished for exercising their right to self-defense, while criminals are allowed to run free.
The article by Bernstein highlights the institutional failure of law enforcement “in reaction to looting, rioting, and other forms of illegal behavior that threatened the well-being of the public.” Bernstein noted that “many police departments received implicit or explicit orders from their political supervisors to “stand down’.”
Bernstein brought up an interesting point in his abstract about the failures of law enforcement during this period:
First, many police departments received implicit or explicit orders from their political supervisors to “stand down.” Second, in many instances, the police themselves were unwilling or unable to combat lawless behavior. If police consistently fail to enforce law and order, the argument against the individual right to bear arms for self-defense purposes significantly weakens.
The Second Amendment exists for a reason. Not only does it protect individuals from a tyrannical government, but also from unruly mobs that are only encouraged to misbehave and cause unrest thanks to the political irresponsibility of many municipalities.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-12--ANTIFA Thugs Destroy Statues of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt in Portland Riots

ANTIFA rioters destroyed two Portland statues of two iconic American presidents during Sunday night riots , running amok in the city in a show of force indicating the militant organization ’ s capabilities months after riots began in Portland .
Statues of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt were destroyed .
A nominal “ indigenous ” contingent of ANTIFA militants was heard cursing “ colonizers ” and those who oppose Black Lives Matter as they dismounted a statue of President Roosevelt using chain pulleys .
take our poll - story continues below Portland Police had promptly broken up an ANTIFA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seemed absent as leftist militants destroyed two American statues without repercussions on Sunday .
A statue of Abraham Lincoln was dismounted using similar chain pulley systems by rioters .
The Lincoln statue was defaced with graffiti reading “ Dakota 38 , ” a reference to 38 Dakota warriors executed by American troops during territorial conflict with the Indian tribe in 1862 .
The Daktota tribe had attacked and murdered five American settlers residing in the Minnesota territory before President Lincoln dispatched federal troops to secure American settlers living in the area .
Both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Oregon Historical Society , a museum which commemorates the heritage of the Pacific Northwest and those who traveled on the Oregon Trail .
The museum itself was attacked and ransacked by ANTIFA militants , who broke its windows and caused extensive property damages .
Criminal riots endure in Portland , with almost nightly events occurring 115 days after initial George Floyd “ protests ” erupted .
The “ progressive ” city has firmly established itself as a nationwide embarrassment , with liberal city leaders proving utterly unable to deter heinous mob criminal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its heroic figures , and what American civilization represents .

ANTIFA Thugs Destroy Statues of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt in Portland Riots
ANTIFA rioters destroyed two Portland statues of two iconic American presidents during Sunday night riots , running amok in the city in a show of force indicating the militant organization’s capabilities months after riots began in Portland.
Statues of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt were destroyed.
A nominal “indigenous” contingent of ANTIFA militants was heard cursing “colonizers” and those who oppose Black Lives Matter as they dismounted a statue of President Roosevelt using chain pulleys.
https://twitter.com/Wildman_AZ/status/1315519086462341122
Portland Police had promptly broken up an ANTIFA riot on Saturday night, but they seemed absent as leftist militants destroyed two American statues without repercussions on Sunday.
A statue of Abraham Lincoln was dismounted using similar chain pulley systems by rioters. The Lincoln statue was defaced with graffiti reading “Dakota 38,” a reference to 38 Dakota warriors executed by American troops during territorial conflict with the Indian tribe in 1862. The Daktota tribe had attacked and murdered five American settlers residing in the Minnesota territory before President Lincoln dispatched federal troops to secure American settlers living in the area.
https://twitter.com/Wildman_AZ/status/1315518381387247616
Both of the statues were located outside of the Oregon Historical Society, a museum which commemorates the heritage of the Pacific Northwest and those who traveled on the Oregon Trail. The museum itself was attacked and ransacked by ANTIFA militants, who broke its windows and caused extensive property damages.
https://twitter.com/Wildman_AZ/status/1315515188045516800
Criminal riots endure in Portland, with almost nightly events occurring 115 days after initial George Floyd “protests” erupted. The “progressive” city has firmly established itself as a nationwide embarrassment, with liberal city leaders proving utterly unable to deter heinous mob criminal activity.
ANTIFA hates American heritage, its heroic figures, and what American civilization represents.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Federal Prosecutors Allege that Netflix Star Who Campaigned for Biden Assaulted 15-Year Old Boy in P

Federal prosecutors are alleging that a Netflix star who campaigned for Joe Biden committed a multitude of sex crimes against underage boys , in one incident assaulting a 15-year old boy in a public bathroom .
Jerry Harris is being charged with assaulting ten boys , and prosecutors are arguing that he “ exhibits all the signs of a serial child predator ” who either “ wanted to be caught or he simply can not control his impulses.
” Harris is most known for his appearance in Netflix ’ s Cheer documentary about competitive cheerleading .
He recently appeared in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in which the Democratic candidate asked for his support in turning out young voters in the November election .
take our poll - story continues below Harris was arrested and charged last month with producing child pornography following a federal investigation , and new charging documents in his case accusing him of even more child sex crimes .
A Tuesday memo from Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Parente states that Harris has admitted to sodomizing and raping a 15-year old child during conversations with law enforcement , and that authorities are currently evaluating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ argued Tuesday for a magistrate judge to revoke Harris ’ home detention as he awaits trial on the child pornography charges , stating that home confinement is “ simply not enough to protect the community from this child predator.
” Harris , who allegedly requested and procured sexual images from at least 9 minors through Snapchat , is being sued by two alleged victims in civil court for damages .
Harris ’ arrest on serial child sex crimes charges comes weeks after Netflix released the film Cuties , which features minors dancing in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ giant has denied that the film is obscene and indecent , even after a county in Texas indicted the company for obscenity in publishing the film .

Federal Prosecutors Allege that Netflix Star Who Campaigned for Biden Assaulted 15-Year Old Boy in Public Restroom
Federal prosecutors are alleging that a Netflix star who campaigned for Joe Biden committed a multitude of sex crimes against underage boys, in one incident assaulting a 15-year old boy in a public bathroom.
Jerry Harris is being charged with assaulting ten boys, and prosecutors are arguing that he “exhibits all the signs of a serial child predator” who either “wanted to be caught or he simply cannot control his impulses.”
Harris is most known for his appearance in Netflix’s Cheer documentary about competitive cheerleading. He recently appeared in a digital campaign event with Joe Biden, in which the Democratic candidate asked for his support in turning out young voters in the November election.
Harris was arrested and charged last month with producing child pornography following a federal investigation, and new charging documents in his case accusing him of even more child sex crimes. A Tuesday memo from Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Parente states that Harris has admitted to sodomizing and raping a 15-year old child during conversations with law enforcement, and that authorities are currently evaluating further criminal charges against him.
Parente argued Tuesday for a magistrate judge to revoke Harris’ home detention as he awaits trial on the child pornography charges, stating that home confinement is “simply not enough to protect the community from this child predator.”
Harris, who allegedly requested and procured sexual images from at least 9 minors through Snapchat, is being sued by two alleged victims in civil court for damages.
Harris’ arrest on serial child sex crimes charges comes weeks after Netflix released the film Cuties, which features minors dancing in a sexually charged manner. The streaming giant has denied that the film is obscene and indecent, even after a county in Texas indicted the company for obscenity in publishing the film.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Kansas State University Kicks Student Jaden McNeil Out of Public Zoom Meeting For Asking If White Li

Kansas State University student and conservative activist Jaden McNeil was booted out of a public Zoom meeting held by the university ’ s Diversity and Inclusion program for daring to ask if white lives mattered .
KSU also livestreamed the meeting on YouTube , but curiously enough the video has now been set to “ private.
” In response to the livestream , the Kansas State Democrats slurred McNeil as a purveyor of “ white supremacist ideals ” and renewed their call for him to be expelled , even though KSU can not expel him because of its nature as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ You ’ re not allowed to say ‘ White lives matter ’ without them attacking you as a white supremacist and calling for you to be expelled .
I thought college was supposed to be about the free exchange of ideas ?
Guess not !
” take our poll - story continues below Big League Politics has covered the rise of McNeil as a young conservative activist .
He was previously head of Kansas State University ’ s Turning Point USA chapter but left the organization due to their hypocrisy and “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the campus group America First Students , which is a more nationalist , socially conservative alternative to campus organizations such as TPUSA .
McNeil also made headlines and caused left-wing outcry over a joke about George Floyd .
There were concerns that KSU administrators would try to expel him , but with the help of conservatives like Michelle Malkin pointing out that they can not expel a student for First Amendment-protected speech , the issue was laid to rest .
Huge props to McNeil for having the fortitude , politically and personally , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his college campus and weather the storms of public backlash and death threats .
And shame on leftist universities for stifling free speech , peddling nonsense like Critical Race Theory and radical feminism , and permitting pro-Antifa and pro-BLM propaganda .
They ought to face financial repercussions .

Kansas State University Kicks Student Jaden McNeil Out of Public Zoom Meeting For Asking If White Lives Mattered
Kansas State University student and conservative activist Jaden McNeil was booted out of a public Zoom meeting held by the university’s Diversity and Inclusion program for daring to ask if white lives mattered.
KSU also livestreamed the meeting on YouTube, but curiously enough the video has now been set to “private.”
In response to the livestream, the Kansas State Democrats slurred McNeil as a purveyor of “white supremacist ideals” and renewed their call for him to be expelled, even though KSU cannot expel him because of its nature as a public university.
McNeil retorted, “You’re not allowed to say ‘White lives matter’ without them attacking you as a white supremacist and calling for you to be expelled. I thought college was supposed to be about the free exchange of ideas? Guess not!”
Big League Politics has covered the rise of McNeil as a young conservative activist. He was previously head of Kansas State University’s Turning Point USA chapter but left the organization due to their hypocrisy and “fair weather conservatism.” He subsequently founded the campus group America First Students, which is a more nationalist, socially conservative alternative to campus organizations such as TPUSA.
McNeil also made headlines and caused left-wing outcry over a joke about George Floyd. There were concerns that KSU administrators would try to expel him, but with the help of conservatives like Michelle Malkin pointing out that they cannot expel a student for First Amendment-protected speech, the issue was laid to rest.
Huge props to McNeil for having the fortitude, politically and personally, to be a vocal right-wing student on his college campus and weather the storms of public backlash and death threats.
And shame on leftist universities for stifling free speech, peddling nonsense like Critical Race Theory and radical feminism, and permitting pro-Antifa and pro-BLM propaganda. They ought to face financial repercussions.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Portland Small Businessman Pledges Support for Donald Trump After Cafe Ransacked by ANTIFA Thugs

A small businessman and veteran who owns a cafe in Portland is pledging to support Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election after a mob of ANTIFA street thugs ransacked and vandalized his business .
John Jackson- a veteran of the US Army and Marine Corps who is black- owns Heroes American Cafe in downtown Portland .
The business pledges a portion of its profits to veterans and police officers , and was thus targeted by ANTIFA as an “ unfriendly ” business to their political vision of leftist anarchy .
take our poll - story continues below Two windows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and another was struck with a baseball bat .
Jackson has described receiving a threatening phone call from someone last week who warned the business would be attacked for its patriotic allegiance .
Jackson is describing the hate crime as having secured his vote for Donald Trump in the upcoming election .
He also blasted Portland ’ s weak local leadership , taking aim at a city government that has permitted violent ANTIFA thugs to commit crimes and terrorize the public for almost 120 days since the initial George Floyd race riots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he told Fox News .
“ I ’ m done with this weakness , and we need some real strong leadership.
” Jackson confirmed he won ’ t let the attack change the way in which he runs his business .
“ We ’ re not changing what we do because of things that are , to me , kind of terroristic in approach.
” Terrorists of ANTIFA have been given free reign to terrorize the public , and this Portland community member has had enough .
He should consider running @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if his campaign message is doomed in the leftist utopia , he could inspire other city residents sick of third world behavior to resist the tyranny of the terrorist organization .

Portland Small Businessman Pledges Support for Donald Trump After Cafe Ransacked by ANTIFA Thugs
A small businessman and veteran who owns a cafe in Portland is pledging to support Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election after a mob of ANTIFA street thugs ransacked and vandalized his business.
John Jackson- a veteran of the US Army and Marine Corps who is black- owns Heroes American Cafe in downtown Portland. The business pledges a portion of its profits to veterans and police officers, and was thus targeted by ANTIFA as an “unfriendly” business to their political vision of leftist anarchy.
Antifa rioters shot inside the Heroes American Cafe in downtown Portland last night during their mass rampage. Antifa has taken issue with the business for putting photos of first responders on its walls & added the cafe to its list of places to target. pic.twitter.com/lGOZ8yjz9c — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 12, 2020
Two windows of the business were shattered with gunfire, and another was struck with a baseball bat. Jackson has described receiving a threatening phone call from someone last week who warned the business would be attacked for its patriotic allegiance.
Jackson is describing the hate crime as having secured his vote for Donald Trump in the upcoming election. He also blasted Portland’s weak local leadership, taking aim at a city government that has permitted violent ANTIFA thugs to commit crimes and terrorize the public for almost 120 days since the initial George Floyd race riots.
“This solidified my Trump vote,” he told Fox News. “I’m done with this weakness, and we need some real strong leadership.”
Jackson confirmed he won’t let the attack change the way in which he runs his business.
“We’re not changing what we do because of things that are, to me, kind of terroristic in approach.”
Terrorists of ANTIFA have been given free reign to terrorize the public, and this Portland community member has had enough. He should consider running for Portland city council or mayor- even if his campaign message is doomed in the leftist utopia, he could inspire other city residents sick of third world behavior to resist the tyranny of the terrorist organization.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Newly Released Docs Show That Mueller Investigation Relied on Media Reports to Indict Trump Official

Newly released documents have shown that the Mueller team relied on reports from the fake news media to build cases against Trump officials while conducting their Russian collusion probe , which were often based on biased anonymous sources or otherwise patently false .
CBS News senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge posted pictures of the “ lightly redacted ” documents on Twitter : take our poll - story continues below She noted that the documents showed Mueller ’ s cases against individuals like Carter Page and Paul Manafort were based on media reports from outlets such as Yahoo , with Democrat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as an authoritative source .
These documents were largely the basis of the IG report , which documented a stunning amount of immoral and unethical behavior but ultimately exonerated the FBI of any criminal wrongdoing in the Russian collusion probe .
Big League Politics reported last year on the disappointing conclusions of the report prepared by Inspector General Michael Horowitz , who was appointed to his post by Barack Hussein Obama : Every person who has believed “ trust the plan ” propaganda received a reality check today after the release of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which cleared the FBI of criminality and political bias in their plot to surveil President Donald Trump .
The fake news is gloating that President Trump has been proven false by the IG report ’ s findings .
Although the IG report admits that the FBI ’ s investigation was improper in certain respects , it justified the underlying basis of the investigation and claimed it was not launched for political purposes because of authentic concerns about Russian collusion .
To sum it up , the deep state ’ s investigation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deep state essentially did nothing wrong .
The report ultimately concluded that no “ documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the FBI ’ s decision to conduct these operations.
” The IG report came to this conclusion despite the fact that 17 inaccuracies were discovered in three surveillance applications , including a completely promulgated rationale to spy on former foreign policy adviser Carter Page .
FBI Director Christopher Wray released a statement claiming that the report shows how the deep state is committed to serving the people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and it is our obligation as public servants to ensure these authorities are exercised with objectivity and integrity , ” Wray said .
“ Anything less falls short of the FBI ’ s duty to the American people.
” Top Congressional Democrats released a statement claiming that the report ’ s findings vindicate their supposition that any talk of deep state wrongdoing is a conspiracy theory .
“ Those discredited conspiracy theories were attempts to deflect from the President ’ s serious and ongoing misconduct , first urging Russia and now extorting Ukraine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him personally and politically , ” said Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Carolyn Maloney , the New York Democrats who co-chair the House Judiciary and Oversight committees .
Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham , who is conducting a separate criminal investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion investigation , publicly disagreed with the findings of the IG report .
There will likely never be any repercussions for the globalist interests who perpetrated Russia-gate because the deep state protects its own .

Newly Released Docs Show That Mueller Investigation Relied on Media Reports to Indict Trump Officials
Newly released documents have shown that the Mueller team relied on reports from the fake news media to build cases against Trump officials while conducting their Russian collusion probe, which were often based on biased anonymous sources or otherwise patently false.
CBS News senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge posted pictures of the “lightly redacted” documents on Twitter:
SCOOP #Durham: @CBSNews obtains 94-page declassified FBI spreadsheet, widely cited by IG Horowitz, but not public until now. Recently released to Senate investigators, the FBI spreadsheet was part of a broader effort to corroborate the Steele dossier claims. pic.twitter.com/tO46InBSae — Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) October 12, 2020
She noted that the documents showed Mueller’s cases against individuals like Carter Page and Paul Manafort were based on media reports from outlets such as Yahoo, with Democrat operatives like disgraced spook Christopher Steele used as an authoritative source.
IG Horowitz page 5 found dossier author Christopher Steele spoke to the Yahoo news reporter prior to publication of a September 23 article. The FBI spreadsheet cites the SAME article on page 51 as supporting evidence. IG Horowitz also faulted the FBI for using the Yahoo — Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) October 12, 2020
should include a variety of intelligence sources, including imagery intelligence, human intelligence, signals intelligence as well as clandestine intelligence collection platforms for verification," Gill said. “You don't rely on media reporting.” — Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) October 12, 2020
These documents were largely the basis of the IG report, which documented a stunning amount of immoral and unethical behavior but ultimately exonerated the FBI of any criminal wrongdoing in the Russian collusion probe.
Big League Politics reported last year on the disappointing conclusions of the report prepared by Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who was appointed to his post by Barack Hussein Obama:
Every person who has believed “trust the plan” propaganda received a reality check today after the release of the much-anticipated Inspector General (IG) report, which cleared the FBI of criminality and political bias in their plot to surveil President Donald Trump. The fake news is gloating that President Trump has been proven false by the IG report’s findings. Although the IG report admits that the FBI’s investigation was improper in certain respects, it justified the underlying basis of the investigation and claimed it was not launched for political purposes because of authentic concerns about Russian collusion. To sum it up, the deep state’s investigation of the deep state has found that the deep state essentially did nothing wrong. The report ultimately concluded that no “documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the FBI’s decision to conduct these operations.” The IG report came to this conclusion despite the fact that 17 inaccuracies were discovered in three surveillance applications, including a completely promulgated rationale to spy on former foreign policy adviser Carter Page. FBI Director Christopher Wray released a statement claiming that the report shows how the deep state is committed to serving the people. “We are vested with significant authorities and it is our obligation as public servants to ensure these authorities are exercised with objectivity and integrity,” Wray said. “Anything less falls short of the FBI’s duty to the American people.” Top Congressional Democrats released a statement claiming that the report’s findings vindicate their supposition that any talk of deep state wrongdoing is a conspiracy theory. “Those discredited conspiracy theories were attempts to deflect from the President’s serious and ongoing misconduct, first urging Russia and now extorting Ukraine into interfering with our elections to benefit him personally and politically,” said Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Carolyn Maloney, the New York Democrats who co-chair the House Judiciary and Oversight committees. Attorney General Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham, who is conducting a separate criminal investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion investigation, publicly disagreed with the findings of the IG report.
There will likely never be any repercussions for the globalist interests who perpetrated Russia-gate because the deep state protects its own.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Tucker Carlson Calls Out Kamala Harris for Being a Gun Grabber

America ’ s loudest voice for America First policies , Tucker Carlson , understands that a Biden Harris ticket is an existential threat to the Second Amendment .
One of his segments last week , Tucker Carlson declared that Kamal Harris is “ dead set ” on carrying out gun confiscation .
The California Senator “ wants to totally ban the online sales of guns , ammunition , and gun parts , ” Carlson asserted .
“ Most ammo in this country is sold over the Internet , by the way , to law enforcement , as well .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Where ’ s the NRA ?
Where are Republicans ?
Who ’ s going to stop the Harris-Biden administration from doing this by executive order ?
” On various occasions , Harris has said that she would enact the aforementioned ban and other similar prohibitions .
take our poll - story continues below “ I will give the United States Congress 100 days to get their act together and have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws and if they fail to do it , then I will take executive action @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mate said .
“ Kamala is a master at euphemisms , ” Second Amendment media personality Colion Noir said on Carlson ’ s show .
“ She really doesn ’ t stand for much of anything , which actually makes her more dangerous than somebody who is actually anti-gun because she is willing to do any and everything to maintain power.
” “ She likes to talk about it in such a way where it seems like I can just order a gun online the same way I can order toilet paper on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up at my door .
And she uses the ignorance of the masses to push this agenda.
” The Bide-Harris ticket is bound to be the most anti-gun presidential duo in American history .
Harris is a certified authoritarian , who not only wants to infringe on gun rights but also free speech via social media regulation .
There ’ s no question about it , a potential Democrat victory will result in further expansion of gun control at the federal level .
A big no-no for anyone who supports the Second Amendment @

Tucker Carlson Calls Out Kamala Harris for Being a Gun Grabber
America’s loudest voice for America First policies, Tucker Carlson, understands that a Biden Harris ticket is an existential threat to the Second Amendment.
One of his segments last week, Tucker Carlson declared that Kamal Harris is “dead set” on carrying out gun confiscation.
The California Senator “wants to totally ban the online sales of guns, ammunition, and gun parts,” Carlson asserted. “Most ammo in this country is sold over the Internet, by the way, to law enforcement, as well. The list goes on and on and on. Where’s the NRA? Where are Republicans? Who’s going to stop the Harris-Biden administration from doing this by executive order?”
On various occasions, Harris has said that she would enact the aforementioned ban and other similar prohibitions.
“I will give the United States Congress 100 days to get their act together and have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws and if they fail to do it, then I will take executive action,” Joe Biden’s running mate said.
“Kamala is a master at euphemisms,” Second Amendment media personality Colion Noir said on Carlson’s show. “She really doesn’t stand for much of anything, which actually makes her more dangerous than somebody who is actually anti-gun because she is willing to do any and everything to maintain power.”
“She likes to talk about it in such a way where it seems like I can just order a gun online the same way I can order toilet paper on Amazon and it’ll just show up at my door. And she uses the ignorance of the masses to push this agenda.”
The Bide-Harris ticket is bound to be the most anti-gun presidential duo in American history. Harris is a certified authoritarian, who not only wants to infringe on gun rights but also free speech via social media regulation.
There’s no question about it, a potential Democrat victory will result in further expansion of gun control at the federal level. A big no-no for anyone who supports the Second Amendment.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Twitter Has Committed $100,000 Worth of Campaign Finance Violations, Says Washington Attorney Genera

Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson has announced that Twitter violated the state ’ s campaign finance laws and will have to fork over $ 100,000 .
The complaint filed by the state of Washington states that Twitter failed to keep records for various candidates and political committees operating within their state .
“ Twitter did not maintain and have available for public inspection all information required under RCW 42.17A.345 and WAC 390-18-050 of commercial advertisers for political advertising that ran on its platform and for which it accepted payment for Washington State campaigns from 2012 through 2019 , ” said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported paying Twitter approximately $ 200,000 for campaign advertising over the course of seven years , from 2012 to 2019 .
Nearly $ 33,000 was paid to Twitter directly while the rest went to Twitter through intermediaries such as political consultants .
take our poll - story continues below Twitter no longer allows political advertising as of November 2019 .
This is hardly the first time Big Tech giants have had run-ins with Attorney General Ferguson .
A press release dated December of 2018 announced that Google and Facebook would need to pay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failure to keep proper records of political advertising for Washington candidates and committees .
And just earlier this year in April , Ferguson sued Facebook a second time for the same offense .
Facebook tried to dismiss the lawsuit but was unsuccessful .
There seems to be a pattern here .
Bob Ferguson may be a Democrat , but we commend him for doing his duty and ensuring that Big Tech follows his state ’ s campaign finance laws .
Lawsuits like these will hopefully keep these behemoths from continuing to try to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absurd amounts of money and are already too powerful as it is .

Twitter Has Committed $100,000 Worth of Campaign Finance Violations, Says Washington Attorney General
Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson has announced that Twitter violated the state’s campaign finance laws and will have to fork over $100,000.
The complaint filed by the state of Washington states that Twitter failed to keep records for various candidates and political committees operating within their state.
“Twitter did not maintain and have available for public inspection all information required under RCW 42.17A.345 and WAC 390-18-050 of commercial advertisers for political advertising that ran on its platform and for which it accepted payment for Washington State campaigns from 2012 through 2019,” said the complaint.
These candidates and committees reported paying Twitter approximately $200,000 for campaign advertising over the course of seven years, from 2012 to 2019. Nearly $33,000 was paid to Twitter directly while the rest went to Twitter through intermediaries such as political consultants.
Twitter no longer allows political advertising as of November 2019.
This is hardly the first time Big Tech giants have had run-ins with Attorney General Ferguson. A press release dated December of 2018 announced that Google and Facebook would need to pay a combined $455,000 for their own failure to keep proper records of political advertising for Washington candidates and committees.
And just earlier this year in April, Ferguson sued Facebook a second time for the same offense. Facebook tried to dismiss the lawsuit but was unsuccessful.
There seems to be a pattern here. Bob Ferguson may be a Democrat, but we commend him for doing his duty and ensuring that Big Tech follows his state’s campaign finance laws. Lawsuits like these will hopefully keep these behemoths from continuing to try to flout the law. They rake in absurd amounts of money and are already too powerful as it is.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--WATCH: Ted Cruz Owns Sheldon Whitehouse on ‘Dark Money’ at Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Hearings

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse ( D-RI ) gave a bizarre and unhinged conspiratorial rant during the Senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett on Tuesday .
Some of his rant can be seen here : take our poll - story continues below Whitehouse attempted to connect Barrett to sources of “ dark money , ” which is a popularized term referring to donor money hidden from public scrutiny .
This talking point has been used by Democrats for years , but has largely fallen out of favor now that former vice president Joe Biden is soaking up the majority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have tried to anoint Whitehouse for his empty blather , but Sen. Ted Cruz ( R-TX ) immediately lit him up due to his immense hypocrisy .
“ First of all , our Democratic colleagues , when they address the issue of so-called dark money in campaign finance contributions , are often deeply , deeply hypocritical , and don ’ t address the actual facts that exist , ” Cruz said in his remarks .
Cruz brought up the fact that 14 of the top 20 super PACs dishing out dark money “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” He also mentioned that the financial contributions of the Wall Street and Fortune 500 elite “ overwhelmingly favor Joe Biden and the Democrats.
” “ All of the great umbrage about the corporate interest are spending dark money is widely in conflict with the actual facts of the corporate interests that are spending dark money are funding the Democrats by a factor of 3-1 or greater , ” Cruz added .
Cruz ’ s full takedown of Whitehouse can be seen here : Cruz also received some flak from Democrats for attempting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the hearings .
Big League Politics has reported on how progressive oligarch George Soros is investing at least $ 50 million to tip the scales for the Democrats in this year ’ s election : The Free Beacon reported that George Soros has pitched in $ 50 million to Democrats ’ PACs and campaigns in the 2020 election cycle .
These contributions represent a record amount of financial support for the billionaire oligarch .
In the 2020 cycle , Soros stepped up his political spending through the Democracy PAC , which he established @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money into other leftist organizations .
According to new filings to the Federal Election Commission , the PAC donated nearly $ 17 million last quarter , which brought its total spending for this cycle to $ 48 million .
Soros donated $ 4 million directly to Democrat campaigns and committees without first funneling the money into his PAC .
The $ 52 million cash injection is over twice the amount that Soros donated in the 2016 presidential election cycle — $ 22 million .
Ironically enough , Democrat candidates who have benefited from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the influence of money in politics .
Cruz has once again shown himself to be a master at exposing Democrat hypocrisy .

WATCH: Ted Cruz Owns Sheldon Whitehouse on ‘Dark Money’ at Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Hearings
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) gave a bizarre and unhinged conspiratorial rant during the Senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett on Tuesday.
Some of his rant can be seen here:
Health care.
Reproductive rights.
Bodily autonomy.
The right to marry whomever you choose. All of this and more is at stake with Amy Coney Barrett's nomination. @SenWhitehouse explains: pic.twitter.com/K9efvrktK5 — CAP Action (@CAPAction) October 13, 2020
Whitehouse attempted to connect Barrett to sources of “dark money,” which is a popularized term referring to donor money hidden from public scrutiny. This talking point has been used by Democrats for years, but has largely fallen out of favor now that former vice president Joe Biden is soaking up the majority of donations from the plutocracy.
Democrats have tried to anoint Whitehouse for his empty blather, but Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) immediately lit him up due to his immense hypocrisy.
“First of all, our Democratic colleagues, when they address the issue of so-called dark money in campaign finance contributions, are often deeply, deeply hypocritical, and don’t address the actual facts that exist,” Cruz said in his remarks.
Cruz brought up the fact that 14 of the top 20 super PACs dishing out dark money “gave virtually all their money to Democrats.” He also mentioned that the financial contributions of the Wall Street and Fortune 500 elite “overwhelmingly favor Joe Biden and the Democrats.”
“All of the great umbrage about the corporate interest are spending dark money is widely in conflict with the actual facts of the corporate interests that are spending dark money are funding the Democrats by a factor of 3-1 or greater,” Cruz added.
Cruz’s full takedown of Whitehouse can be seen here:
AMAZING video of @SenTedCruz calling out Dem Dark Money and completely destroying @SenWhitehouse pic.twitter.com/JNcFSm6Slt — Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) October 13, 2020
Cruz also received some flak from Democrats for attempting to humanize Barrett while questioning her at the hearings.
When Dems & Lefty media are trying to demonize someone (“she’s the Handmaid’s Tale!”), they HATE when people get to see her as a real person, a loving Mom who deals with all the life challenges every parent does. https://t.co/Cmk6mtbj25 — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) October 13, 2020
Big League Politics has reported on how progressive oligarch George Soros is investing at least $50 million to tip the scales for the Democrats in this year’s election:
The Free Beacon reported that George Soros has pitched in $50 million to Democrats’ PACs and campaigns in the 2020 election cycle. These contributions represent a record amount of financial support for the billionaire oligarch. In the 2020 cycle, Soros stepped up his political spending through the Democracy PAC, which he established in 2019 to dump large sums of money into other leftist organizations. According to new filings to the Federal Election Commission, the PAC donated nearly $17 million last quarter, which brought its total spending for this cycle to $48 million. Soros donated $4 million directly to Democrat campaigns and committees without first funneling the money into his PAC. The $52 million cash injection is over twice the amount that Soros donated in the 2016 presidential election cycle — $22 million. Ironically enough, Democrat candidates who have benefited from Soros’ generous candidates have lamented about the influence of money in politics.
Cruz has once again shown himself to be a master at exposing Democrat hypocrisy.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Joe Biden Insults 56 Percent of Voters Who Claim They’re Economically Better Off Under Trump Than Ob

Joe Biden has once again drawn attention for one of his remarks , stating that 56 percent of voters who claim they are in a better economic position under Donald Trump than Barack Obama do not have a good memory and should not even consider voting for him .
The Democratic presidential candidate made the remark during an interview with WKRC Cincinnati reporter Kyle Inskeep following a campaign event .
“ Gallup reported last week [ that ] 56 percent of Americans said that they were better off today than they were four years ago .
So why should people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ off today , under the Trump administration , vote for you ?
” Inskeep asked Biden .
“ Well , if they think that , they probably shouldn ’ t , ” Biden answered .
“ They think — 54 percent of the American people are better off economically today than they were under our administration ?
Well , their memory is not very good , quite frankly.
” take our poll - story continues below The five-minute interview also discussed Biden ’ s thoughts on the close nature of the race , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and a potential COVID-19 vaccine .
One can arguably describe Joe Biden ’ s presidential campaign as not much more than a continual series of gaffes and questionable remarks .
This remark isn ’ t nearly as shocking or reprehensible as Hillary Clinton ’ s “ Deplorables ” insult that labeled half the country irredeemable bigots , of course .
But any time a presidential candidate negatively paints a majority of the electorate with a broad brush , it should be noted and called out .

Joe Biden Insults 56 Percent of Voters Who Claim They’re Economically Better Off Under Trump Than Obama
Joe Biden has once again drawn attention for one of his remarks, stating that 56 percent of voters who claim they are in a better economic position under Donald Trump than Barack Obama do not have a good memory and should not even consider voting for him.
The Democratic presidential candidate made the remark during an interview with WKRC Cincinnati reporter Kyle Inskeep following a campaign event.
“Gallup reported last week [that] 56 percent of Americans said that they were better off today than they were four years ago. So why should people who feel that they’re better off today, under the Trump administration, vote for you?” Inskeep asked Biden.
“Well, if they think that, they probably shouldn’t,” Biden answered. “They think — 54 percent of the American people are better off economically today than they were under our administration? Well, their memory is not very good, quite frankly.”
The five-minute interview also discussed Biden’s thoughts on the close nature of the race, his position on packing the Supreme Court, and a potential COVID-19 vaccine.
One can arguably describe Joe Biden’s presidential campaign as not much more than a continual series of gaffes and questionable remarks. This remark isn’t nearly as shocking or reprehensible as Hillary Clinton’s “Deplorables” insult that labeled half the country irredeemable bigots, of course. But any time a presidential candidate negatively paints a majority of the electorate with a broad brush, it should be noted and called out.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Harvard Study: Patients Who Recover From COVID-19 are Immunized From Reinfection for Four Months

A new Harvard study has indicated that patients who recover from COVID-19 are immunized from reinfection for four months , which means President Donald Trump could resume full campaigning without any public health risk .
The Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts General Hospital ( MGH ) has discovered that serious COVID-19 patients develop a strong immune response to the virus , which they surmise gives them protection from reinfection for four months .
The peer reviewed study has been published in the Science Immunology journal .
Richelle Charles , an investigator in the Division of Infectious Diseases at MGH who was a major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their research intended to address the “ big knowledge gap in terms of how long…antibody responses last ” in recovered COVID-19 patients .
They studied blood samples from 343 patients to determine their conclusions .
They figured out that patients who recover from COVID-19 have an elevated total of the antibody , immunoglobulin G ( IgG ) in their blood for four months .
They also discovered that the blood of recovered patients has the presence of protective neutralizing antibodies that also protect them from reinfection .
take our poll - story continues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very likely protected for that period of time , ” said Charles .
“ We showed that key antibody responses to COVID-19 do persist.
” The researchers claim that the findings will help improve the efficacy of nasal swab tests , which have been notoriously unreliable throughout the COVID-19 pandemic .
“ There are a lot of infections in the community that we do not pick up through PCR testing during acute infection , and this is especially true in areas where access to testing is limited , ” said Jason Harris , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Knowing how long antibody responses last is essential before we can use antibody testing to track the spread of COVID-19 and identify ‘ hot spots ’ of the disease , ” he added .
Big League Politics has reported on how shoddy testing has led to COVID-19 mass hysteria to take hold across the country : Scientific experts are raising concerns about the efficacy of COVID-19 tests , claiming that they are too sensitive to the virus and recording an astronomical amount of false positives as a result .
The experts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are showing up with “ positive ” results even though there is virtually no way they could ever spread COVID-19 with the negligable amount of the virus in their system .
The tests are picking up trace levels of COVID-19 and reporting them as positive tests , which fuels the media-driven hysteria .
The PCR tests that have been most regularly used for COVID-19 screenings gives a yes-or-no response regarding infections .
The experts claim that this is woefully inaccurate to make public health considerations .
“ We ’ ve been using one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is just plus or minus — that ’ s all .
We ’ re using that for clinical diagnostics , for public health , for policy decision-making , ” said Dr. Michael Mina , who is an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H .
Chan School of Public Health .
Dr. Mina is calling for more COVID-19 tests but not under the regime that is currently in place throughout the country right now .
“ In fact , we should be ramping up testing of all different people , ” he said , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through whole different mechanisms.
” The Trump administration announced last week that they will be purchasing 150 million rapid tests , which experts say is more accurate because they determine how much of the virus is in a particular individual .
This information can more accurately determine who needs to be quarantined .
“ It ’ s really irresponsible , I think , to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue , ” Dr. Mina said .
Sets of testing data in Massachusetts , Nevada and New York show that up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carried barely any virus .
Of course , this news is only being released now that the vast majority of the public has already lost their souls to the chaos and confusion of the scamdemic .
The findings in the Harvard study will stick in the craw of Democrat politicians who want to demonize President Trump and stop him from resuming his campaign following his recovery from COVID-19 .

Harvard Study: Patients Who Recover From COVID-19 are Immunized From Reinfection for Four Months
A new Harvard study has indicated that patients who recover from COVID-19 are immunized from reinfection for four months, which means President Donald Trump could resume full campaigning without any public health risk.
The Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) has discovered that serious COVID-19 patients develop a strong immune response to the virus, which they surmise gives them protection from reinfection for four months. The peer reviewed study has been published in the Science Immunology journal.
Richelle Charles, an investigator in the Division of Infectious Diseases at MGH who was a major contributor to the study, noted that their research intended to address the “big knowledge gap in terms of how long…antibody responses last” in recovered COVID-19 patients. They studied blood samples from 343 patients to determine their conclusions.
They figured out that patients who recover from COVID-19 have an elevated total of the antibody, immunoglobulin G (IgG) in their blood for four months. They also discovered that the blood of recovered patients has the presence of protective neutralizing antibodies that also protect them from reinfection.
“That means that people are very likely protected for that period of time,” said Charles. “We showed that key antibody responses to COVID-19 do persist.”
The researchers claim that the findings will help improve the efficacy of nasal swab tests, which have been notoriously unreliable throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
“There are a lot of infections in the community that we do not pick up through PCR testing during acute infection, and this is especially true in areas where access to testing is limited,” said Jason Harris, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at MGH.
“Knowing how long antibody responses last is essential before we can use antibody testing to track the spread of COVID-19 and identify ‘hot spots’ of the disease,” he added.
Big League Politics has reported on how shoddy testing has led to COVID-19 mass hysteria to take hold across the country:
Scientific experts are raising concerns about the efficacy of COVID-19 tests, claiming that they are too sensitive to the virus and recording an astronomical amount of false positives as a result. The experts are claiming that people taking the tests are showing up with “positive” results even though there is virtually no way they could ever spread COVID-19 with the negligable amount of the virus in their system. The tests are picking up trace levels of COVID-19 and reporting them as positive tests, which fuels the media-driven hysteria. The PCR tests that have been most regularly used for COVID-19 screenings gives a yes-or-no response regarding infections. The experts claim that this is woefully inaccurate to make public health considerations. “We’ve been using one type of data for everything, and that is just plus or minus — that’s all. We’re using that for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision-making,” said Dr. Michael Mina, who is an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Dr. Mina is calling for more COVID-19 tests but not under the regime that is currently in place throughout the country right now. “In fact, we should be ramping up testing of all different people,” he said, “but we have to do it through whole different mechanisms.” The Trump administration announced last week that they will be purchasing 150 million rapid tests, which experts say is more accurate because they determine how much of the virus is in a particular individual. This information can more accurately determine who needs to be quarantined. “It’s really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue,” Dr. Mina said. Sets of testing data in Massachusetts, Nevada and New York show that up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus. Of course, this news is only being released now that the vast majority of the public has already lost their souls to the chaos and confusion of the scamdemic.
The findings in the Harvard study will stick in the craw of Democrat politicians who want to demonize President Trump and stop him from resuming his campaign following his recovery from COVID-19.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal Warns that Amy Coney Barrett Could Strike Down State Gun Control La

Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal Warns that Amy Coney Barrett Could Strike Down State Gun Control Laws
Democrat Senator Richard Blumenthal warned that Judge Amy Coney Barrett could be the deciding vote in Supreme Court rulings that overturn state gun control laws in the event of her confirmation during the first round of Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Monday.
Blumenthal claimed that Barrett would strike down “common sense gun safety laws” as a SCOTUS justice, citing the highly restrictive gun control laws of his state of Connecticut. Connecticut bans most commonly owned semiautomatic rifles, and the state’s laws have been called the “toughest in the country” on gun owners.
Watch Blumenthal’s remarks on Barrett’s generally strong pro-Second Amendment judicial track record here.
It would be a good thing if Barrett were to overturn draconian state laws that prevent Americans from owning commonplace firearms. The weapons banned by states such as Connecticut, New York and New Jersey are very rarely used in criminal acts, and their banning has not led to a lasting decrease in gun violence in the states, especially in conjunction with the leniency New York state has begun to show criminals.
Barrett has ruled against permanently stripping non-violent felons of their gun rights in the past, a proposal disliked by gun control supporters who oppose any mechanism for rehabilitated individuals to regain their gun rights after a criminal conviction.
Blumenthal also referenced the possibility of the Supreme Court terminating Obamacare in the event of future litigation, an unnecessary scenario considering that nominal conservative justices such as John Roberts have ruled that elements of the healthcare law are constitutional when challenged at the court.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-13--New Report Shows China Using Students to Steal American Tech

A new congressional report revealed that the Chinese Communist Party has established an intricate network of students who are compelled to steal American technology .
According to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission report , for years , China has made attempts to bolster its military by stealing American science and technology research .
In addition , it “ has built a sprawling ecosystem of structures , programs , and incentives to coopt and exploit Chinese students and scholars for the [ science and technology ] they acquire abroad.
” The Washington Free Beacon noted that the number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A not so trivial minority of these students , who are enrolled in scientific and mathematical programs , do indeed pose national security threats to America through their theft of research .
The report indicated that China usually requires its students to conduct operations that provide material benefits to the Chinese Communist Party as a condition of their study abroad program .
A good portion of the technology that is stolen by these Chinese nationals is sent by backchannels to companies and institutions connected to the Chinese military .
Theoretically , such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ field between the two countries .
take our poll - story continues below “ In effect , U.S. universities are training scientists and engineers who will work in a range of organizations antithetical to U.S. national security interests , including the [ People ’ s Liberation Army ] , ” the report stated .
The substantial influx of Chinese students who enter the United States annually presents many vetting challenges .
Due to an excessive number of cases and constraints with personnel , U.S. federal authorities have only rejected less than 5 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raised national security red flags , per the report .
Jack Beyer of the Washington Free Beacon gave a brief overview of what China does to subvert American institutions : China is currently the largest perpetrator of intellectual property theft globally and uses a complex network of Confucius Institutes on campus , consulates , and government initiatives like the Thousand Talents Program to commit unprecedented amounts of data and technology theft .
China ’ s expansion is no joke .
Despite how off-base the American government ’ s foreign policy has been since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ namely its regime change misadventures in the Middle East , it is slowly beginning to recognize the China threat .
In a letter sent out in August , the State Department issued a warning to the leadership of American colleges and universities of the threat that China poses to American higher education .
“ The CCP ’ s actions pose an immense threat to academic freedom and to human dignity , ” the letter stated .
“ While Americans may differ on many issues , this is a threat that unites us all.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Maoism was put to rest decades ago , the post-Deng Xiaoping China is still a strategic rival to the U.S. For various factions of the CCP , China is on a rendezvous with destiny and aspires to be a peer rival with the U.S. and ultimately surpass it .
Unlike previous rivals , they will use unconventional and less militarized ways to spread influence .
One way that the U.S. can delay China ’ s launch is by passing commonsense immigration restrictions and making sure that universities don ’ t get infiltrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ payroll of the CCP .

New Report Shows China Using Students to Steal American Tech
A new congressional report revealed that the Chinese Communist Party has established an intricate network of students who are compelled to steal American technology.
According to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission report, for years, China has made attempts to bolster its military by stealing American science and technology research. In addition, it “has built a sprawling ecosystem of structures, programs, and incentives to coopt and exploit Chinese students and scholars for the [science and technology] they acquire abroad.”
The Washington Free Beacon noted that the number of Chinese students in America has increased fivefold. A not so trivial minority of these students, who are enrolled in scientific and mathematical programs, do indeed pose national security threats to America through their theft of research.
The report indicated that China usually requires its students to conduct operations that provide material benefits to the Chinese Communist Party as a condition of their study abroad program. A good portion of the technology that is stolen by these Chinese nationals is sent by backchannels to companies and institutions connected to the Chinese military. Theoretically, such technological transfers could level the military playing field between the two countries.
“In effect, U.S. universities are training scientists and engineers who will work in a range of organizations antithetical to U.S. national security interests, including the [People’s Liberation Army],” the report stated.
The substantial influx of Chinese students who enter the United States annually presents many vetting challenges. Due to an excessive number of cases and constraints with personnel, U.S. federal authorities have only rejected less than 5 percent of visa applicants from China who have raised national security red flags, per the report.
Jack Beyer of the Washington Free Beacon gave a brief overview of what China does to subvert American institutions:
China is currently the largest perpetrator of intellectual property theft globally and uses a complex network of Confucius Institutes on campus, consulates, and government initiatives like the Thousand Talents Program to commit unprecedented amounts of data and technology theft.
China’s expansion is no joke. Despite how off-base the American government’s foreign policy has been since the end of the Cold War, namely its regime change misadventures in the Middle East, it is slowly beginning to recognize the China threat. In a letter sent out in August, the State Department issued a warning to the leadership of American colleges and universities of the threat that China poses to American higher education.
“The CCP’s actions pose an immense threat to academic freedom and to human dignity,” the letter stated. “While Americans may differ on many issues, this is a threat that unites us all.”
Although the world can be glad that Maoism was put to rest decades ago, the post-Deng Xiaoping China is still a strategic rival to the U.S. For various factions of the CCP, China is on a rendezvous with destiny and aspires to be a peer rival with the U.S. and ultimately surpass it. Unlike previous rivals, they will use unconventional and less militarized ways to spread influence. One way that the U.S. can delay China’s launch is by passing commonsense immigration restrictions and making sure that universities don’t get infiltrated by Chinese nationals who are on the payroll of the CCP.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Two Arrested and Charged in Portland Riot That Destroyed Statues of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt

Two men have been arrested and charged with felony offenses for their involvement in riots that resulted in the destruction of Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln in Portland .
38-year old Brandon Bartells and Malik Fard Muhammad were charged by the Multnomah County District Attorney on Tuesday , making their first court appearances .
The men engaged in a riot that was supposedly organized by an “ indigenous ” Portland ANTIFA organization , but neither of them appear to be distinctly Native American .
take our poll - story continues below The Sunday riot had resulted in the destruction of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lincoln and another of Theodore Roosevelt .
Bartells allegedly drove a truck that was used to dismount a Teddy Roosevelt “ Rough Rider ” statue from its pedestal in Portland ’ s downtown area .
He ’ s being charged with first-degree felony criminal mischief and felony riot .
Malik Fard Muhamad is also being charged with unlawful possession of a firearm , possession of a loaded firearm in public , first-degree felony criminal mischief and felony riot .
Court documents allege that Muhamad vandalized the Portland Historical Society during the riot , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Oregon Trail and the Pacific Northwest .
When arrested , he was allegedly found carrying a loaded pistol magazine that matched a discarded firearm law enforcement located near the scene of his arrest .
The Oregon Historical Society has indicated that it ’ s suffered at least $ 20,000 in damages from the Sunday riot , with at least one historical exhibit being looted .
The Lincoln and Roosevelt statues will cost $ 20,000 and $ 10,000 to repair , respectively , but it ’ s doubtful that the city of Portland @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an alternative deemed less “ racist ” by the city ’ s militant leftist subculture .
Neither of the charged criminal suspects are even from Portland or Oregon .
Bartells is from Washington , and Muhamad is from Indiana .
Bartells was reportedly arrested in booked into a Wisconsin jail for refusing to comply with a riot dispersal order during this summer ’ s Kenosha riots .
An Abraham Lincoln statue was also dismounted and defaced by the rioters .
President Donald Trump had instructed the FBI to investigate the attack on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ willingness to use federal law enforcement as an alternative to the unreliable and liberal-controlled Portland police and justice system .

Two Arrested and Charged in Portland Riot That Destroyed Statues of Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt
Two men have been arrested and charged with felony offenses for their involvement in riots that resulted in the destruction of Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln in Portland.
38-year old Brandon Bartells and Malik Fard Muhammad were charged by the Multnomah County District Attorney on Tuesday, making their first court appearances. The men engaged in a riot that was supposedly organized by an “indigenous” Portland ANTIFA organization, but neither of them appear to be distinctly Native American.
Tonight the “indigenous” faction of antifa held a “day of rage” riot in Portland. They banned video recording as the criminal acts were planned ahead. They’ve toppled the statues of Roosevelt & Lincoln so far using chains. #PortlandRiots pic.twitter.com/PkTqxeCLIj — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 12, 2020
The Sunday riot had resulted in the destruction of two presidential statues, one of Abraham Lincoln and another of Theodore Roosevelt.
Bartells allegedly drove a truck that was used to dismount a Teddy Roosevelt “Rough Rider” statue from its pedestal in Portland’s downtown area. He’s being charged with first-degree felony criminal mischief and felony riot.
Malik Fard Muhamad is also being charged with unlawful possession of a firearm, possession of a loaded firearm in public, first-degree felony criminal mischief and felony riot. Court documents allege that Muhamad vandalized the Portland Historical Society during the riot, a museum that commemorates the heritage of the Oregon Trail and the Pacific Northwest. When arrested, he was allegedly found carrying a loaded pistol magazine that matched a discarded firearm law enforcement located near the scene of his arrest.
https://twitter.com/Wildman_AZ/status/1315515188045516800
The Oregon Historical Society has indicated that it’s suffered at least $20,000 in damages from the Sunday riot, with at least one historical exhibit being looted. The Lincoln and Roosevelt statues will cost $20,000 and $10,000 to repair, respectively, but it’s doubtful that the city of Portland will replace them, opting instead for an alternative deemed less “racist” by the city’s militant leftist subculture.
Neither of the charged criminal suspects are even from Portland or Oregon. Bartells is from Washington, and Muhamad is from Indiana. Bartells was reportedly arrested in booked into a Wisconsin jail for refusing to comply with a riot dispersal order during this summer’s Kenosha riots.
An Abraham Lincoln statue was also dismounted and defaced by the rioters.
https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/status/1315514533771964417?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1315514533771964417%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthepostmillennial.com%2Ftwo-charged-statue-toppling-portland
President Donald Trump had instructed the FBI to investigate the attack on the presidential statues in Portland, expressing a willingness to use federal law enforcement as an alternative to the unreliable and liberal-controlled Portland police and justice system.
https://twitter.com/Wildman_AZ/status/1315865483371925505


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Joe Biden Won’t Deny Meeting Burisma Exec After Bombshell Hunter Biden Email Report

Joe Biden isn ’ t expressly denying ever meeting a Burisma executive who sought to meet with him , following the New York Post ’ s publication of Hunter Biden emails in which Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi speaks of meeting the then-Vice President .
Pozharskyi thanks Hunter Biden for “ giving [ him ] an opportunity to meet your father and spent [ sic ] some time together ” in an email published Wednesday .
Biden has previously denied meeting any Burisma personnel in connection to his son ’ s employment with the oligarch-owned gas company .
Hunter Biden was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the company , despite having no experience in the energy industry , while his father was Vice President .
Trending : Kansas State University Kicks Student Jaden McNeil Out of Public Zoom Meeting For Asking If White Lives Mattered The Biden campaign stated that it had no record of a meeting with Pozharskyi on the then-Vice President ’ s official schedule .
“ We have reviewed Joe Biden ’ s official schedules from the time and no meeting , as alleged by the New York Post , ever took place.
” take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , when asked about the possibility of a meeting with Pozharskyi that wasn ’ t recognized on the Vice President ’ s official schedule by Politico , the Biden campaign declined to rule out the possibility , in fact clarifying that such a possible meeting would have been “ cursory ” and brief .
Biden claims that he has “ never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.
” And yet a high-ranking Burisma official has thanked Hunter Biden for a chance to meet the senior Biden , indicating a contradiction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims .
Biden publicly bragged about arranging for the firing of a Ukranian prosecutor investigating Burisma for financial improprieties while speaking at an event of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations organization .

Joe Biden Won’t Deny Meeting Burisma Exec After Bombshell Hunter Biden Email Report
Joe Biden isn’t expressly denying ever meeting a Burisma executive who sought to meet with him, following the New York Post’s publication of Hunter Biden emails in which Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi speaks of meeting the then-Vice President.
Pozharskyi thanks Hunter Biden for “giving [him] an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together” in an email published Wednesday.
Biden has previously denied meeting any Burisma personnel in connection to his son’s employment with the oligarch-owned gas company. Hunter Biden was paid $50,000 a month to work for the company, despite having no experience in the energy industry, while his father was Vice President.
The Biden campaign stated that it had no record of a meeting with Pozharskyi on the then-Vice President’s official schedule. “We have reviewed Joe Biden’s official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place.”
However, when asked about the possibility of a meeting with Pozharskyi that wasn’t recognized on the Vice President’s official schedule by Politico, the Biden campaign declined to rule out the possibility, in fact clarifying that such a possible meeting would have been “cursory” and brief.
Biden claims that he has “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings.” And yet a high-ranking Burisma official has thanked Hunter Biden for a chance to meet the senior Biden, indicating a contradiction with the Democratic presidential candidate’s claims.
Biden publicly bragged about arranging for the firing of a Ukranian prosecutor investigating Burisma for financial improprieties while speaking at an event of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations organization.
https://twitter.com/Wildman_AZ/status/1316506298402267137


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Hunter Biden Was NOT “Hacked;” Agreed to Transfer Ownership of Mac Under Terms of Repair Agreement

Twitter has cited its “ Hacked Materials Policy ” to justify a wide-ranging and unprecedented censorship campaign against the New York Post ’ s report on Hunter Biden ’ s organization of a meeting between Burisma executives and Vice President Biden .
But its own policy does not apply , as the materials published in the story were not hacked .
The Post included an invoice that Biden had signed upon handing over his Mac to the computer repair contractor , including his signature .
Trending : DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York Post went on to obtain email communications from the Macbook in which Hunter Biden organized a meeting between his father- then-Vice President Joe Biden- and senior executives at Burisma , the oligarch-owned Ukrainian oil company for which the younger Biden had secured a lucrative position at despite having no experience in the energy industry .
take our poll - story continues below Under the terms of the contract Biden signed with a Delaware computer repair man , he legally agreed to forfeit the water-damaged laptop after 90 days of repair completion if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ services rendered and take back possession of the device .
The younger Biden did not recover his laptop , thus surrendering the device to the store owner under the conditions of his agreement .
“ Equipment left with [ store owner ] after 90 days of notification of completed service will be treated as abandoned and you agree to hold [ store owner ] harmless for any damage for loss of property.
” The FBI ultimately issued a subpoena to recover the laptop , but by the time it had , the computer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drive of the device ’ s contents , which include video of the younger Biden engaging in sexual acts , smoking crack , and engaging in suspicious dealings under the terms of his employment with Burisma .
Joe Biden had previously denied that he ever met with any Burisma executives in connection with his son ’ s employment with the company , a statement that email communications between Hunter Biden and a Burisma executive contradicts .
Twitter is lying when they claim the materials released from the Biden laptop were “ hacked.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violations , offering in-kind contributions to the Biden campaign while censoring information embarrassing to the Democratic candidate .

Hunter Biden Was NOT “Hacked;” Agreed to Transfer Ownership of Mac Under Terms of Repair Agreement
Twitter has cited its “Hacked Materials Policy” to justify a wide-ranging and unprecedented censorship campaign against the New York Post’s report on Hunter Biden’s organization of a meeting between Burisma executives and Vice President Biden. But its own policy does not apply, as the materials published in the story were not hacked.
The Post included an invoice that Biden had signed upon handing over his Mac to the computer repair contractor, including his signature.
The New York Post went on to obtain email communications from the Macbook in which Hunter Biden organized a meeting between his father- then-Vice President Joe Biden- and senior executives at Burisma, the oligarch-owned Ukrainian oil company for which the younger Biden had secured a lucrative position at despite having no experience in the energy industry.
Under the terms of the contract Biden signed with a Delaware computer repair man, he legally agreed to forfeit the water-damaged laptop after 90 days of repair completion if he didn’t pay for the services rendered and take back possession of the device. The younger Biden did not recover his laptop, thus surrendering the device to the store owner under the conditions of his agreement.
“Equipment left with [store owner] after 90 days of notification of completed service will be treated as abandoned and you agree to hold [store owner] harmless for any damage for loss of property.”
The FBI ultimately issued a subpoena to recover the laptop, but by the time it had, the computer repair shop owner had created a hard drive of the device’s contents, which include video of the younger Biden engaging in sexual acts, smoking crack, and engaging in suspicious dealings under the terms of his employment with Burisma. Joe Biden had previously denied that he ever met with any Burisma executives in connection with his son’s employment with the company, a statement that email communications between Hunter Biden and a Burisma executive contradicts.
Twitter is lying when they claim the materials released from the Biden laptop were “hacked.”
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1316484977928941570?s=21
Twitter has now committed felony campaign finance violations, offering in-kind contributions to the Biden campaign while censoring information embarrassing to the Democratic candidate.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Russia Again Calls for Peace Between Armenia and Azerbaijan After Broken Ceasefire

The Russian government has renewed its call for an end to hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh .
According to The Guardian , Russian Minister of Defence Sergei Shoygu spoke to the Azeri and Armenian ministers of defence and urged them to respect the conditions of their previously agreed-upon ceasefire .
The Russian government brokered the truce on October 9 , yet hardly a few minutes after signing both Azerbaijan and Armenia accused each other of violating it .
Trending : DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because it lies within its borders .
Armenia claims the territory because a majority of ethnic Armenians populate and govern it .
Both sides have accused the other of ratcheting the conflict up into full-blown violence and targeting civilians .
take our poll - story continues below More than 500 people are said to have died throughout 17 days of fighting .
Big League Politics ’ Richard Moorhead wrote the following about the conflict when it first broke out : Ethnic warfare over the area first erupted in 1988 as the two nations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and has flared up intermittently since then .
The region is largely internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan , and Azeri attempts to assert sovereignty over the mountainous region have been met with fierce resistance from the local population before .
The fighting exploded over the weekend when Azerbaijan attempted to move its military personnel into the area , and it appears that the latest round of fighting has been the most vicious so far .
The warfare escalated when Armenia accused Azerbaijan of deploying artillery and airstrikes against pro-Armenian fighters in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used the weapons in response to Armenian attacks of the same variety .
Armenia is Christian , and Azerbaijan is Muslim .
The former has conditional backing from the Russian Federation , while Azerbaijan is staunchly supported by neighboring Turkey .
Many Armenians are staunch in their defense of the region as an Armenian territory , citing the legacy of the Ottoman Empire ’ s genocide of the Armenian population of Anatolia following World War I. Russia is in a difficult position and it ’ s good to see them actively working for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Azeris , it would not be wise for Russia to give too much assistance to their Armenian allies .
A large-scale regional war with the backing of major powers risks greater escalation and devastation that ’ s not worth it for anyone .

Russia Again Calls for Peace Between Armenia and Azerbaijan After Broken Ceasefire
The Russian government has renewed its call for an end to hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.
According to The Guardian, Russian Minister of Defence Sergei Shoygu spoke to the Azeri and Armenian ministers of defence and urged them to respect the conditions of their previously agreed-upon ceasefire.
The Russian government brokered the truce on October 9, yet hardly a few minutes after signing both Azerbaijan and Armenia accused each other of violating it.
Azerbaijan claims Nagorno-Karabakh because it lies within its borders. Armenia claims the territory because a majority of ethnic Armenians populate and govern it. Both sides have accused the other of ratcheting the conflict up into full-blown violence and targeting civilians.
More than 500 people are said to have died throughout 17 days of fighting.
Big League Politics’ Richard Moorhead wrote the following about the conflict when it first broke out:
Ethnic warfare over the area first erupted in 1988 as the two nations separated from the collapsing Soviet Union, and has flared up intermittently since then. The region is largely internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and Azeri attempts to assert sovereignty over the mountainous region have been met with fierce resistance from the local population before. The fighting exploded over the weekend when Azerbaijan attempted to move its military personnel into the area, and it appears that the latest round of fighting has been the most vicious so far. The warfare escalated when Armenia accused Azerbaijan of deploying artillery and airstrikes against pro-Armenian fighters in the region, with Azerbaijan claiming it only used the weapons in response to Armenian attacks of the same variety. Armenia is Christian, and Azerbaijan is Muslim. The former has conditional backing from the Russian Federation, while Azerbaijan is staunchly supported by neighboring Turkey. Many Armenians are staunch in their defense of the region as an Armenian territory, citing the legacy of the Ottoman Empire’s genocide of the Armenian population of Anatolia following World War I.
Russia is in a difficult position and it’s good to see them actively working for peace. Despite Turkey’s assistance to the Azeris, it would not be wise for Russia to give too much assistance to their Armenian allies. A large-scale regional war with the backing of major powers risks greater escalation and devastation that’s not worth it for anyone.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Britain Introduces Permanent Color-Coded Submission Regime in Response to COVID-19

Britain is rolling out their “ three-tiered system ” for restricting the liberties of its citizenry throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond .
The plan is endorsed wholeheartedly by Prime Minister Boris Johnson , the Conservative Party figurehead who was elected to free Britain from globalist rule .
Instead , he has implemented the technocracy like no other and essentially rendered the Brexit moot by abusing his authority in myriad ways .
Johnson introduced the new regime earlier this week .
The national government will divide regional authorities into “ local Covid alert levels ” , which are listed as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( tier 2 ) , and very high ( tier 3 ) .
Tier 1 is color coded in yellow while Tier 2 is color coded in light orange with Tier 3 being color coded in dark orange .
Each distinction brings a host of new restrictions that will cripple public life and destroy British businesses .
Notice how there is no “ low ” level of threat even listed as an option here , as British authorities demonstrate that the return to a free society is no longer tenable .
Trending : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented “ This is not how we want to live our lives , but this is the narrow path we have to tread between the social and economic trauma of a full lockdown and the massive human , and indeed economic cost of an uncontained epidemic , ” Johnson said .
take our poll - story continues below Johnson has effectively surrendered to the mass hysteria , lacking the strength and the will to defeat COVID-19 as quickly as President Donald Trump vanquished @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaders in the north-west , the north-east and Yorkshire and Humber is continuing , ” Johnson said .
“ I know how difficult this is .
They , like us , like everyone in this house , are grappling with very real dilemmas , but we can not let the NHS fall over when lives are at stake .
“ So let me repeat the offer that we ’ re making to those local authorities : work with us on these difficult but necessary measures in the areas that are rated very high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local test and trace , more funding for local enforcement , the offer of support form the armed forces , and the job support scheme , as announced by the chancellor , ” he added .
Big League Politics has reported on how Johnson has lost his courage after struggling with the virus , demonstrating how his weak leadership pales in comparison to that of President Trump : After being stricken with coronavirus and considered in critical condition for days , United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson emerged from the hospital after a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ After being stricken with coronavirus and considered in critical condition for days , United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson emerged from the hospital after a stay in the intensive care unit .
The Tory leader came out of the infirmary singing the praises of the country ’ s National Health System ( NHS ) and the immigrants who are instrumental in its implementation .
“ The reason , in the end , my body did start to get enough oxygen was because , for every second of the night , they were watching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ caring and making the interventions I needed , ” Johnson said in an address to the nation on Sunday .
“ So that is also how I know , that across this country , 24 hours a day , for every second , for every hour , there are hundreds of thousands of NHS staff who are acting with the same care and thought and precision as Jenny and Luis , ” he added .
Johnson was particularly effusive in heaping praise toward the immigrant doctors who treated him while he was in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Johnson will be pushing back against mass immigration and socialism throughout the Brexit process if his sentiments are any indicator .
“ I will never , ever be able to repay you and I will never stop thanking you , ” Johnson said .
He also called Britain ’ s socialized healthcare model “ unconquerable ” and “ the beating heart of this country.
” The United Kingdom is finished with pathetic Tory leaders like Johnson failing his nation .
The United States will be in the same boat if Trump is @ @ @ @

Britain Introduces Permanent Color-Coded Submission Regime in Response to COVID-19
Britain is rolling out their “three-tiered system” for restricting the liberties of its citizenry throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
The plan is endorsed wholeheartedly by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the Conservative Party figurehead who was elected to free Britain from globalist rule. Instead, he has implemented the technocracy like no other and essentially rendered the Brexit moot by abusing his authority in myriad ways.
Johnson introduced the new regime earlier this week. The national government will divide regional authorities into “local Covid alert levels”, which are listed as medium (tier 1), high (tier 2), and very high (tier 3). Tier 1 is color coded in yellow while Tier 2 is color coded in light orange with Tier 3 being color coded in dark orange. Each distinction brings a host of new restrictions that will cripple public life and destroy British businesses. Notice how there is no “low” level of threat even listed as an option here, as British authorities demonstrate that the return to a free society is no longer tenable.
“This is not how we want to live our lives, but this is the narrow path we have to tread between the social and economic trauma of a full lockdown and the massive human, and indeed economic cost of an uncontained epidemic,” Johnson said.
Johnson has effectively surrendered to the mass hysteria, lacking the strength and the will to defeat COVID-19 as quickly as President Donald Trump vanquished the virus.
“Engagement with other leaders in the north-west, the north-east and Yorkshire and Humber is continuing,” Johnson said. “I know how difficult this is. They, like us, like everyone in this house, are grappling with very real dilemmas, but we cannot let the NHS fall over when lives are at stake.
“So let me repeat the offer that we’re making to those local authorities: work with us on these difficult but necessary measures in the areas that are rated very high, in return for more support for local test and trace, more funding for local enforcement, the offer of support form the armed forces, and the job support scheme, as announced by the chancellor,” he added.
Big League Politics has reported on how Johnson has lost his courage after struggling with the virus, demonstrating how his weak leadership pales in comparison to that of President Trump:
After being stricken with coronavirus and considered in critical condition for days, United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson emerged from the hospital after a stay in the intensive care unit. After being stricken with coronavirus and considered in critical condition for days, United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson emerged from the hospital after a stay in the intensive care unit. The Tory leader came out of the infirmary singing the praises of the country’s National Health System (NHS) and the immigrants who are instrumental in its implementation. “The reason, in the end, my body did start to get enough oxygen was because, for every second of the night, they were watching and they were thinking and they were caring and making the interventions I needed,” Johnson said in an address to the nation on Sunday. “So that is also how I know, that across this country, 24 hours a day, for every second, for every hour, there are hundreds of thousands of NHS staff who are acting with the same care and thought and precision as Jenny and Luis,” he added. Johnson was particularly effusive in heaping praise toward the immigrant doctors who treated him while he was in the ICU. It does not appear that Johnson will be pushing back against mass immigration and socialism throughout the Brexit process if his sentiments are any indicator. “I will never, ever be able to repay you and I will never stop thanking you,” Johnson said. He also called Britain’s socialized healthcare model “unconquerable” and “the beating heart of this country.”
The United Kingdom is finished with pathetic Tory leaders like Johnson failing his nation. The United States will be in the same boat if Trump is defeated in November.