bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Report: AG Bill Barr’s ‘Unmasking’ Probe Has Concluded Without Any Charges Against Obama Administrat

Those who “ trusted the plan ” that Attorney General Bill Barr was going to clean up the deep state and put corrupt actors from the Obama administration to justice are learning a hard lesson in how the swamp works .
Barr , who initially served under globalist President George H.W .
Bush and was responsible for orchestrating the heinous Ruby Ridge atrocity , is reportedly not going to charge anyone from the Obama regime for the “ unmasking ” of their political opponents in the Russia-gate scandal .
According to the Washington Post , the investigation ordered by Barr @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrongdoing.
” U.S. Attorney John Bash is the man who was tasked with this investigation by Barr , and he is allegedly using his authority to protect the deep state from being held accountable for the greatest crime in American history .
Barr ’ s office is hiding Bash ’ s findings from the public .
Trending : DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented Bash announced his departure from the Department of Justice on Oct. 5 but never mentioned the unmasking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has seemingly done everything in its power to keep this information under wraps , similar to what has been done with the probe into the origins of the Russian collusion scandal that is being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham .
take our poll - story continues below Big League Politics has reported on the likelihood that the investigation has been a sham all along , meant to rope in Trump supporters and keep them docile while all the corruption is covered up : Trump supporters are waiting with baited breath for U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his explosive findings in regards to his investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion probe against President Trump .
According to Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton , Trump supporters are getting taken for a ride .
Fitton said during a recent appearance on Fox Business ’ “ Lou Dobbs Tonight ” that Barr and Durham are making no progress on investigating what very well may be the worst criminal conspiracy in U.S. history .
“ You know , my concern is it ’ s been , what , sixteen-plus months since Durham @ @ @ @ @ @ @ questioning Mr. Brennan , ” Fitton said .
Fitton said that he is inclined to believe disgraced former CIA Director John Brennan when he says that he is not a person of interest in Durham ’ s investigation .
“ I don ’ t see grand juries operating .
I don ’ t see a bunch of witnesses coming in .
I don ’ t see lawyers complaining about their clients being brought in before Durham , ” Fitton said .
He said that the Mueller investigation was run much more thoroughly than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goal of which appears to be protecting the deep state .
“ You know when the government is being pressure on witnesses and subjects and that is not evident here , ” Fitton said , adding that it is his opinion that Durham is “ not doing the work ” needed to bring deep state criminals to justice .
Fitton did not object to Dobbs ’ characterization that he is calling the Durham a “ sham.
” “ I ’ ll have to tell you .
I ’ m a little concerned that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agency because if this is the way they operate , it ’ s going to take them decades to deal with anything of real complexity , ” Dobbs said .
“ Well , [ FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith ] wasn ’ t arrested but they managed to arrest Stephen Bannon .
The comparison and contrasting to me is just remarkable , ” Fitton responded .
President Trump is getting the picture that he along with the American public have been had by AG Barr and other veteran deep staters .
“ If that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m very disappointed , ” Trump told Rush Limbaugh last week .
“ I think it ’ s a terrible thing , and I will say it to [ Barr ’ s ] face.
” If President Trump loses in November , Russia-gate will be swept under the rug , and the obscene and illicit operations conducted against Trump by his political opposition will be legitimized forevermore .

Report: AG Bill Barr’s ‘Unmasking’ Probe Has Concluded Without Any Charges Against Obama Administration
Those who “trusted the plan” that Attorney General Bill Barr was going to clean up the deep state and put corrupt actors from the Obama administration to justice are learning a hard lesson in how the swamp works.
Barr, who initially served under globalist President George H.W. Bush and was responsible for orchestrating the heinous Ruby Ridge atrocity, is reportedly not going to charge anyone from the Obama regime for the “unmasking” of their political opponents in the Russia-gate scandal.
According to the Washington Post, the investigation ordered by Barr has concluded without “finding any substantive wrongdoing.” U.S. Attorney John Bash is the man who was tasked with this investigation by Barr, and he is allegedly using his authority to protect the deep state from being held accountable for the greatest crime in American history. Barr’s office is hiding Bash’s findings from the public.
Bash announced his departure from the Department of Justice on Oct. 5 but never mentioned the unmasking probe. The AG’s office has seemingly done everything in its power to keep this information under wraps, similar to what has been done with the probe into the origins of the Russian collusion scandal that is being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham.
Big League Politics has reported on the likelihood that the investigation has been a sham all along, meant to rope in Trump supporters and keep them docile while all the corruption is covered up:
Trump supporters are waiting with baited breath for U.S. Attorney John Durham to come out with his explosive findings in regards to his investigation into the origins of the Russian collusion probe against President Trump. According to Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton, Trump supporters are getting taken for a ride. Fitton said during a recent appearance on Fox Business’ “Lou Dobbs Tonight” that Barr and Durham are making no progress on investigating what very well may be the worst criminal conspiracy in U.S. history. “You know, my concern is it’s been, what, sixteen-plus months since Durham was appointed and only now is he questioning Mr. Brennan,” Fitton said. Fitton said that he is inclined to believe disgraced former CIA Director John Brennan when he says that he is not a person of interest in Durham’s investigation. “I don’t see grand juries operating. I don’t see a bunch of witnesses coming in. I don’t see lawyers complaining about their clients being brought in before Durham,” Fitton said. He said that the Mueller investigation was run much more thoroughly than Durham’s so-called investigation, the goal of which appears to be protecting the deep state. “You know when the government is being pressure on witnesses and subjects and that is not evident here,” Fitton said, adding that it is his opinion that Durham is “not doing the work” needed to bring deep state criminals to justice. Fitton did not object to Dobbs’ characterization that he is calling the Durham a “sham.” “I’ll have to tell you. I’m a little concerned that the FBI is no longer an investigative agency because if this is the way they operate, it’s going to take them decades to deal with anything of real complexity,” Dobbs said. “Well, [FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith] wasn’t arrested but they managed to arrest Stephen Bannon. The comparison and contrasting to me is just remarkable,” Fitton responded.
President Trump is getting the picture that he along with the American public have been had by AG Barr and other veteran deep staters.
“If that’s the case, I’m very disappointed,” Trump told Rush Limbaugh last week. “I think it’s a terrible thing, and I will say it to [Barr’s] face.”
If President Trump loses in November, Russia-gate will be swept under the rug, and the obscene and illicit operations conducted against Trump by his political opposition will be legitimized forevermore.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz is Demanding that the ATF Stop Messing With Gun Owners

A few months ago , Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz sent a number of letters calling on Attorney General William Barr and Acting Director Regina Lombardo at the Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco , Firearms , and Explosives ( ATF ) , to stop to the agency ’ s attempts to restrict “ the possession of certain pistol braces by American citizens.
” Fellow congressmen Bill Posey , Greg Steube , John Rutherford , Ted Yoho , Neal Dunn , and Daniel Webster joined Gaetz in signing on to a June 16 letter that criticized the ATF ’ s “ practice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to promulgate general firearms policy hidden from public scrutiny and awareness.
” Dave Workman of AmmoLand noted that “ Pistol arm braces were developed to provide more stability for people using AR-15-type semiauto pistols ” In addition , pistol braces have “ become popular accessories , with more than 2 million+ sold to gun owners , according to the June 16th , 2020 letter.
” Trending : DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented The letter highlighted how back in 2012 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of pistol arm braces ” and at the time “ correctly determined that the attachment of arm braces to large pistol platforms does not constitute the manufacture of a short-barreled rifle.
” take our poll - story continues below But like all bureaucratic guidelines , policies are subject to change .
Gaetz responded firmly against these arbitrary changes .
“ Despite initially welcoming the introduction of pistol arm braces , ” the June 16 letter declared , “ it has come to our attention that ATF is now attempting to restrict some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ creating non-public standards that are not based in statute or regulation .
For example , in determining whether an item is an arm brace or stock , ATF has , through private letters , created an inexhaustive list of what it considers ‘ objective design features.
’ With no basis in law , one of the ‘ indicators ’ chosen to make these determinations is ‘ length of pull , ’ which is the distance from the rear of the stabilizing brace to the trigger.
” “ Unbeknownst to the general public , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ ATF has ordained in private determination letters that it considers ‘ any firearm with a ‘ length of pull ’ over 13 ½ inches to be designed to be fired from the shoulder , ’ thereby making it a short-barreled rifle.
” In the letter released back in June , Gaetz and his partners in Congress presented three questions to the Attorney General and the Acting Director : • What specific criteria does ATF use to determine whether a firearm is designed and intended to be fired from the shoulder ?
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans to determine whether their firearm is designed and intended to be fired from the shoulder ?
• How many firearms with affixed arm braces have been evaluated by the Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division in support of other law enforcement agencies or criminal prosecutions ?
Although the letter was not even noticed by the ATF , Gaetz , Posey , Yoho , and Steube sent out a second letter in late September to Barr and Lombardo .
In the letter , they voiced increased satisfaction with the fact that the Justice Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s rogue agenda of criminalizing firearms affixed with arm braces , ” they as the agency “ has decided to pursue , in secret , a ‘ workaround ’ to DOJs countermeasures that is hostile to citizens ’ Second Amendment right and to due process.
” Additionally , the letter argues that the ATF “ is now exploiting its criminal enforcement powers to threaten small business owners around the country into complying with made-up and shifting criteria for determining the difference between a pistol and a short-barreled rifle.
” The second letter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the questions brought forward in the June letter “ no later than Friday , October 9.
” The main question that this letter deals with is regarding the ATF ’ s controversial re-classification of the Honey Badger pistol that Q , LLC makes .
The ATF classified it as a “ short-barreled rifle.
” The ATF sent Q , LLC a cease and desist letter on August 3 .
In it , the ATF informed the company about why it decided to reclassify its Honey Badger pistol .
The letter noted the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that makes pistol arm braces , immediately stood in solidarity with Q , LLC .
SB Tactical released a statement in which it declared that it “ is disappointed by the recent ATF actions in classifying their Honey Badger™ pistol as a short-barreled rifle .
This classification is based on a seemingly arbitrary set of criteria and promises to create unnecessary confusion and anxiety amongst millions of legal gun owners and the industry as a whole.
” “ The ATF is saying , in part , that they will not evaluate an accessory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tactical ’ s statement added , “ but that the characteristics of the entire firearm influence their decision .
Characteristics such as optics chosen , magazine capacity , how the gun is marketed , or length of pull will “ holistically ” determine a firearm ’ s NFA classification .
Moreover , the ATF has , to date , refused to clarify or state what characteristics define a Pistol Stabilizing Brace® .
They have stated that “ they will know it when they see it ” .
“ This arbitrary approach is creating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ citizens , ” SB Tactical argues , “ manufacturers , retailers , and wholesalers .
SB Tactical is the inventor of the Pistol Stabilizing Brace and is deeply committed to our customers , the Second Amendment , and the rule of law .
The ATF ’ s approach is unfair and unlawful.
” The four elected officials made it clear in their follow-up letter that the “ ATF immediately cease abusing its enforcement authority by threatening law-abiding small business owners and the now estimated 3-4 million Americans who own firearms equipped with arm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used by many Americans , ” the letter observed , “ and they are particularly popular among veterans—especially veterans with service-connected disabilities .
For these men and women to have served our nation , and then to be arbitrarily deprived of their constitutional rights , is shameful , unconscionable , and wrong.
” Gun owners must come to grips with the reality that the ATF is not a friend of gun owners .
Bureaucracies are not accountable to voters and infringe liberties behind closed doors and not subject to the wrath of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ATF , if not outright abolishing it altogether , would deal a massive blow to the federal gun control regime .

Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz is Demanding that the ATF Stop Messing With Gun Owners
A few months ago, Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz sent a number of letters calling on Attorney General William Barr and Acting Director Regina Lombardo at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), to stop to the agency’s attempts to restrict “the possession of certain pistol braces by American citizens.”
Fellow congressmen Bill Posey, Greg Steube, John Rutherford, Ted Yoho, Neal Dunn, and Daniel Webster joined Gaetz in signing on to a June 16 letter that criticized the ATF’s “practice of relying on arbitrary, non-public standards to promulgate general firearms policy hidden from public scrutiny and awareness.”
Dave Workman of AmmoLand noted that “Pistol arm braces were developed to provide more stability for people using AR-15-type semiauto pistols” In addition, pistol braces have “become popular accessories, with more than 2 million+ sold to gun owners, according to the June 16th, 2020 letter.”
The letter highlighted how back in 2012, the “ATF initially welcomed the advent of pistol arm braces” and at the time “correctly determined that the attachment of arm braces to large pistol platforms does not constitute the manufacture of a short-barreled rifle.”
But like all bureaucratic guidelines, policies are subject to change. Gaetz responded firmly against these arbitrary changes.
“Despite initially welcoming the introduction of pistol arm braces,” the June 16 letter declared, “it has come to our attention that ATF is now attempting to restrict some of the most popular arm brace configurations by creating non-public standards that are not based in statute or regulation. For example, in determining whether an item is an arm brace or stock, ATF has, through private letters, created an inexhaustive list of what it considers ‘objective design features.’ With no basis in law, one of the ‘indicators’ chosen to make these determinations is ‘length of pull,’ which is the distance from the rear of the stabilizing brace to the trigger.”
“Unbeknownst to the general public,” Gaetz continued in his letter, “ATF has ordained in private determination letters that it considers ‘any firearm with a ‘length of pull’ over 13 ½ inches to be designed to be fired from the shoulder,’ thereby making it a short-barreled rifle.”
In the letter released back in June, Gaetz and his partners in Congress presented three questions to the Attorney General and the Acting Director:
What specific criteria does ATF use to determine whether a firearm is designed and intended to be fired from the shoulder? What specific ATF publications are available for Americans to determine whether their firearm is designed and intended to be fired from the shoulder? How many firearms with affixed arm braces have been evaluated by the Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division in support of other law enforcement agencies or criminal prosecutions?
Although the letter was not even noticed by the ATF, Gaetz, Posey, Yoho, and Steube sent out a second letter in late September to Barr and Lombardo. In the letter, they voiced increased satisfaction with the fact that the Justice Department had made attempts “to temper ATF’s rogue agenda of criminalizing firearms affixed with arm braces,” they as the agency “has decided to pursue, in secret, a ‘workaround’ to DOJs countermeasures that is hostile to citizens’ Second Amendment right and to due process.”
Additionally, the letter argues that the ATF “is now exploiting its criminal enforcement powers to threaten small business owners around the country into complying with made-up and shifting criteria for determining the difference between a pistol and a short-barreled rifle.”
The second letter requested that the ATF give a response to the questions brought forward in the June letter “no later than Friday, October 9.” The main question that this letter deals with is regarding the ATF’s controversial re-classification of the Honey Badger pistol that Q, LLC makes. The ATF classified it as a “short-barreled rifle.” The ATF sent Q, LLC a cease and desist letter on August 3. In it, the ATF informed the company about why it decided to reclassify its Honey Badger pistol. The letter noted the following:
The Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division (FATD) examined the Honey Badger Pistol manufactured and marketed by Q, LLC and determined the firearm is a short-barreled rifle as defined under the NFA. A short-barreled rifle is subject to the registration, transfer, taxation, and possession restrictions regarding these regulated firearms, which include criminal penalties relating to the illegal transfer and possession of said firearms.
SB Tactical, a company that makes pistol arm braces, immediately stood in solidarity with Q, LLC. SB Tactical released a statement in which it declared that it “is disappointed by the recent ATF actions in classifying their Honey Badger™ pistol as a short-barreled rifle. This classification is based on a seemingly arbitrary set of criteria and promises to create unnecessary confusion and anxiety amongst millions of legal gun owners and the industry as a whole.”
“The ATF is saying, in part, that they will not evaluate an accessory as a stand-alone product,” SB Tactical’s statement added, “but that the characteristics of the entire firearm influence their decision. Characteristics such as optics chosen, magazine capacity, how the gun is marketed, or length of pull will “holistically” determine a firearm’s NFA classification. Moreover, the ATF has, to date, refused to clarify or state what characteristics define a Pistol Stabilizing Brace®. They have stated that “they will know it when they see it”.
“This arbitrary approach is creating confusion and uncertainty for millions of law-abiding citizens,” SB Tactical argues, “manufacturers, retailers, and wholesalers. SB Tactical is the inventor of the Pistol Stabilizing Brace and is deeply committed to our customers, the Second Amendment, and the rule of law. The ATF’s approach is unfair and unlawful.”
The four elected officials made it clear in their follow-up letter that the “ATF immediately cease abusing its enforcement authority by threatening law-abiding small business owners and the now estimated 3-4 million Americans who own firearms equipped with arm braces.”
“These devices are widely used by many Americans,” the letter observed, “and they are particularly popular among veterans—especially veterans with service-connected disabilities. For these men and women to have served our nation, and then to be arbitrarily deprived of their constitutional rights, is shameful, unconscionable, and wrong.”
Gun owners must come to grips with the reality that the ATF is not a friend of gun owners. Bureaucracies are not accountable to voters and infringe liberties behind closed doors and not subject to the wrath of the voters at the ballot box. Defunding the ATF, if not outright abolishing it altogether, would deal a massive blow to the federal gun control regime.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--DOJ: President Trump’s Proposed ‘Total Declassification’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implem

The Department of Justice ( DOJ ) is overruling President Donald Trump ’ s declaration that all Russia-gate documents are to be declassified without redactions .
The DOJ made it clear on Tuesday that President Trump has no real power , and the deep state remains fully in charge .
As such , their secrets will be protected , and the American public will stay in the dark .
President Trump issued his decision on Twitter last week , apparently blissfully unaware that he has no real authority to govern the country : take our poll - story continues below @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White House Counsel ’ s Office essentially informed them to ignore the president ’ s tweets completely .
As a result , the DOJ will continue to redact documents and release them slowly so the public remains ignorant about what is really going on with the federal government as they vote in November .
“ The White House Counsel ’ s Office informed the Department that there is no order requiring wholesale declassification or disclosure of documents at issue in this matter , ” Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer wrote in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issued an order for the DOJ to clarify their policy following the president ’ s declaration .
Weinsheimer made it clear that the office of Attorney General Bill Barr is not with the president when it comes to transparency .
They are still working to suppress information and protect the federal swamp from repercussions .
“ The Attorney General has not ordered the declassification and release of any of the redacted material in this case based on the President ’ s tweets , ” Weinsheimer wrote .
“ The Department was further informed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter do not require altering any redactions on any record at issue in this case , including but not limited to , any redactions taken pursuant to any discretionary FOIA exemptions , ” he added .
Big League Politics reported last week when President Trump made the controversial declaration : On Tuesday night , President Donald Trump announced in a tweet that he has authorized the total declassification of all pertinent documents related to the Russia-gate hoax that was perpetrated by the Obama administration in what is likely the biggest scandal in American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Twitter all Wednesday morning demanding that heads must roll over this deep state corruption… Earlier today , a virtual press conference was held at the Department of Justice on a “ matter of national security.
” The individuals in attendance were FBI Director Chris Wray , Assistant Attorney General John C. Demers , U.S. Attorney Zach Terwilliger , and FBI Washington Field Office Acting Assistant Director James Dawson .
Instead of focusing on deep state corruption , they simply patted themselves on their back for their counter-terrorism efforts during the press conference @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to an American public that no longer finds their authority legitimate… President Trump has less than four weeks to expose deep state traitors to the American public .
His re-election hopes may hinge on how effective he is in that regard .
It is becoming more obvious that the deep state is going to protect itself at all costs , even if it means the total annihilation of America as we know it .

DOJ: President Trump’s Proposed ‘Total Declassification’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is overruling President Donald Trump’s declaration that all Russia-gate documents are to be declassified without redactions.
The DOJ made it clear on Tuesday that President Trump has no real power, and the deep state remains fully in charge. As such, their secrets will be protected, and the American public will stay in the dark.
President Trump issued his decision on Twitter last week, apparently blissfully unaware that he has no real authority to govern the country:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313640512025513984
The DOJ told a judge that the White House Counsel’s Office essentially informed them to ignore the president’s tweets completely. As a result, the DOJ will continue to redact documents and release them slowly so the public remains ignorant about what is really going on with the federal government as they vote in November.
“The White House Counsel’s Office informed the Department that there is no order requiring wholesale declassification or disclosure of documents at issue in this matter,” Associate Deputy Attorney General Bradley Weinsheimer wrote in a filing with Judge Reggie Walton, who issued an order for the DOJ to clarify their policy following the president’s declaration.
Weinsheimer made it clear that the office of Attorney General Bill Barr is not with the president when it comes to transparency. They are still working to suppress information and protect the federal swamp from repercussions.
“The Attorney General has not ordered the declassification and release of any of the redacted material in this case based on the President’s tweets,” Weinsheimer wrote.
“The Department was further informed that the President’s statements on Twitter do not require altering any redactions on any record at issue in this case, including but not limited to, any redactions taken pursuant to any discretionary FOIA exemptions,” he added.
Big League Politics reported last week when President Trump made the controversial declaration:
On Tuesday night, President Donald Trump announced in a tweet that he has authorized the total declassification of all pertinent documents related to the Russia-gate hoax that was perpetrated by the Obama administration in what is likely the biggest scandal in American history… President Trump has been worked up on Twitter all Wednesday morning demanding that heads must roll over this deep state corruption… Earlier today, a virtual press conference was held at the Department of Justice on a “matter of national security.” The individuals in attendance were FBI Director Chris Wray, Assistant Attorney General John C. Demers, U.S. Attorney Zach Terwilliger, and FBI Washington Field Office Acting Assistant Director James Dawson. Instead of focusing on deep state corruption, they simply patted themselves on their back for their counter-terrorism efforts during the press conference, desperately trying to demonstrate their value to an American public that no longer finds their authority legitimate… President Trump has less than four weeks to expose deep state traitors to the American public. His re-election hopes may hinge on how effective he is in that regard.
It is becoming more obvious that the deep state is going to protect itself at all costs, even if it means the total annihilation of America as we know it.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Sen. Josh Hawley Calls for Investigation After Facebook Egregiously Censors News of Hunter Biden’s E

Sen. Josh Hawley ( R-MO ) is calling for an investigation after a Facebook executive announced earlier today that the platform would be egregiously censoring a report detailing Hunter Biden ’ s leaked emails .
Trending : DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented Hawley was responding to a shocking post from Facebook Communications Director Andy Stone , a veteran Democrat operative before being hired by the social media giant , who announced publicly that the report would be censored regardless of its accuracy : The explosive report , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York Post , detailed Hunter Biden ’ s drug-fueled cronyism .
The emails showed how Hunter Biden introduced his father Joe , who was vice president at the time , to Ukrainian Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi .
This contradicts claims made by the Biden campaign that Joe and his troubled son never talked business while he was vice president .
“ The seemingly selective nature of this public intervention suggests partiality on the part of Facebook , ” Hawley wrote in a letter addressed to Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of content revealing potentially unethical activity by a candidate for president raises a number of additional questions , to which I expect responses immediately , ” he continued .
“ Isn ’ t such a public intervention itself a reflection of Facebook ’ s assessment of a news report ’ s credibility ?
” Hawley asked .
“ The New York Post previously reported that employees of the six largest Silicon Valley tech firms – including Facebook – have donated nearly $ 5 million to the Biden-Harris campaign , compared to just $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
What steps has Facebook taken to ensure that your employees ’ political preferences don ’ t influence decisions to suppress content ?
” Howley added .
Hawley ’ s full letter to Zuckerberg can be seen here : Big League Politics has reported on Facebook ’ s malicious efforts to oust President Trump from the White House , which has ramped up dramatically throughout the election season : Facebook has announced an October surprise in the form of a new policy that will come into place just weeks before the November election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrict access to your content , services or information if we determine that doing so is reasonably necessary to avoid or mitigate adverse legal or regulatory impacts to Facebook , ” the new terms of service read… This new policy will allow Facebook to capriciously censor content from Trump supporters in the lead up to this year ’ s presidential election .
It is another encroachment in the real electoral interference conspiracy coming from the Silicon Valley tech giants… Facebook is trying to use their monopoly power , granted to them under Section @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to influence elections .
They are more dangerous to democracy than the Russians could ever hope to be .
Facebook and other monolithic Big Tech entities are guilty of the collusion that the Russians were framed for .
They have emerged as an existential threat to democracy .

Sen. Josh Hawley Calls for Investigation After Facebook Egregiously Censors News of Hunter Biden’s Email Scandal
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) is calling for an investigation after a Facebook executive announced earlier today that the platform would be egregiously censoring a report detailing Hunter Biden’s leaked emails.
.@Facebook I want to know on what grounds you are actively censoring a news report about potentially illegal corruption by the Democrat candidate for president. If you have evidence this is “disinformation,” disclose it immediately. Expect a formal inquiry from my office — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) October 14, 2020
Hawley was responding to a shocking post from Facebook Communications Director Andy Stone, a veteran Democrat operative before being hired by the social media giant, who announced publicly that the report would be censored regardless of its accuracy:
While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebook's third-party fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform. — Andy Stone (@andymstone) October 14, 2020
The explosive report, which was initially published in the New York Post, detailed Hunter Biden’s drug-fueled cronyism. The emails showed how Hunter Biden introduced his father Joe, who was vice president at the time, to Ukrainian Burisma advisor Vadym Pozharskyi. This contradicts claims made by the Biden campaign that Joe and his troubled son never talked business while he was vice president.
“The seemingly selective nature of this public intervention suggests partiality on the part of Facebook,” Hawley wrote in a letter addressed to Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
“And your efforts to suppress the distribution of content revealing potentially unethical activity by a candidate for president raises a number of additional questions, to which I expect responses immediately,” he continued.
“Isn’t such a public intervention itself a reflection of Facebook’s assessment of a news report’s credibility?” Hawley asked.
“The New York Post previously reported that employees of the six largest Silicon Valley tech firms – including Facebook – have donated nearly $5 million to the Biden-Harris campaign, compared to just $239,000 to President Trump’s campaign. What steps has Facebook taken to ensure that your employees’ political preferences don’t influence decisions to suppress content?” Howley added.
Hawley’s full letter to Zuckerberg can be seen here:
.@Facebook explain your decision to censor the sourced reporting of the @nypost. Did Biden campaign ask you to do so? pic.twitter.com/FdGQV5N7i3 — Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) October 14, 2020
Big League Politics has reported on Facebook’s malicious efforts to oust President Trump from the White House, which has ramped up dramatically throughout the election season:
Facebook has announced an October surprise in the form of a new policy that will come into place just weeks before the November election. “We also can remove or restrict access to your content, services or information if we determine that doing so is reasonably necessary to avoid or mitigate adverse legal or regulatory impacts to Facebook,” the new terms of service read… This new policy will allow Facebook to capriciously censor content from Trump supporters in the lead up to this year’s presidential election. It is another encroachment in the real electoral interference conspiracy coming from the Silicon Valley tech giants… Facebook is trying to use their monopoly power, granted to them under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, to influence elections. They are more dangerous to democracy than the Russians could ever hope to be.
Facebook and other monolithic Big Tech entities are guilty of the collusion that the Russians were framed for. They have emerged as an existential threat to democracy.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--MELTDOWN: Crazy Nancy Pelosi Accuses CNN of Supporting President Trump for Questioning Her on COVID-

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) became unhinged during a recent appearance on CNN when host Wolf Blitzer actually attempted to do some journalism , for a change .
Blitzer pushed Pelosi for playing politics with COVID-19 relief legislation .
She has insisted on the inclusion of Democrat pork into any COVID-19 relief bill , which has caused the effort to stall .
“ You evidently do not respect the chairman of the committees who wrote these bills , and I wish you would respect the knowledge that goes into meeting the needs of the American people , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented “ But again , you ’ ve ( inaudible ) defending the administration all this time with no knowledge , ” she added .
take our poll - story continues below Blitzer attempted to diffuse the bizarre and awkward situation , but Pelosi was so triggered over his legitimate questioning that she would not let it go .
“ Madam Speaker , these are incredibly difficult times right now , and we ’ ll leave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so much for joining us , ” he said .
“ We ’ ll leave it on the note that you ’ re not right on this , Wolf , and I hate to say that to you , but I feel confident about it , and I feel confident about my colleagues , and I feel confident in my chairs , ” Pelosi snapped back .
This is when Blitzer began to lose his patience and refused to let Pelosi treat him like a doormat for challenging her nonsense .
“ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s about millions of Americans who can ’ t put food on the table , who can ’ t pay the rent , ” Blitzer said .
Pelosi yelled over Blitzer , refused to allow him to make any point , and never backed up anything she said with any substance .
“ We represent them and we know them .
We know them .
We represent them , ” Pelosi said .
“ As we say , don ’ t let the perfect be the enemy of the good , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your sensitivity to our constituents ’ needs , ” Pelosi said sarcastically .
“ I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging for food , begging for money , ” Blitzer added .
“ Have you fed them ?
We feed them .
We feed them , ” Pelosi said .
At this point , Blitzer mercifully ended the conversation before the House Speaker could humiliate herself further .
The entire exchange can be seen here : Big League Politics has reported on Pelosi ’ s extreme contempt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worsened substantially in recent months as her mental faculties slip noticeably : House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) is blaming a salon , alleging an elaborate conspiracy against her , after she was caught breaking COVID-19 quarantine rules to get a haircut .
“ I take responsibility for trusting the word of a neighborhood salon , ” Pelosi said to reporters on Wednesday .
“ It turns out it was a setup.
” Pelosi was apparently clueless about the COVID-19 restrictions in her home state of California and went solely on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dubious story can be believed at all .
“ I take responsibility for trusting the word of a neighborhood salon that I ’ ve been to over the years many times , ” Pelosi said .
“ I trusted that – as it turns out it was a setup , ” she added .
“ So I take responsibility for falling for a setup and that ’ s all I ’ m going to say on that.
” Now , she wants the salon to issue an apology to her for supposedly engaging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look foolish and hypocritical .
“ I think this salon owes me an apology for setting up , ” she said .
Erica Kious , the California salon owner being criticized by Pelosi , is not likely to apologize .
She appeared on Fox News to talk about Pelosi ’ s extreme contempt for the little people and her obvious belief that she is above the rules that others in non-privileged positions have to abide by .
“ It was a slap in the face that she went in , you know , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go and get her stuff done while no-one else can go in , and I can ’ t work , ” she said .
In-door salon activity is still banned in the city of San Francisco , although outdoor haircuts are now permitted .
Pelosi has emerged as the Marie Antionette of the declining U.S. empire .
Few career politicians are more open in their contempt of the American public than Pelosi .

MELTDOWN: Crazy Nancy Pelosi Accuses CNN of Supporting President Trump for Questioning Her on COVID-19 Relief Deal
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) became unhinged during a recent appearance on CNN when host Wolf Blitzer actually attempted to do some journalism, for a change.
Blitzer pushed Pelosi for playing politics with COVID-19 relief legislation. She has insisted on the inclusion of Democrat pork into any COVID-19 relief bill, which has caused the effort to stall.
“You evidently do not respect the chairman of the committees who wrote these bills, and I wish you would respect the knowledge that goes into meeting the needs of the American people,” Pelosi said to Blitzer.
“But again, you’ve (inaudible) defending the administration all this time with no knowledge,” she added.
Blitzer attempted to diffuse the bizarre and awkward situation, but Pelosi was so triggered over his legitimate questioning that she would not let it go.
“Madam Speaker, these are incredibly difficult times right now, and we’ll leave it on that note. Thank you so much for joining us,” he said.
“We’ll leave it on the note that you’re not right on this, Wolf, and I hate to say that to you, but I feel confident about it, and I feel confident about my colleagues, and I feel confident in my chairs,” Pelosi snapped back.
This is when Blitzer began to lose his patience and refused to let Pelosi treat him like a doormat for challenging her nonsense.
“It’s not about me. It’s about millions of Americans who can’t put food on the table, who can’t pay the rent,” Blitzer said.
Pelosi yelled over Blitzer, refused to allow him to make any point, and never backed up anything she said with any substance.
“We represent them and we know them. We know them. We represent them,” Pelosi said.
“As we say, don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good,” Blitzer responded.
“Thank you for your sensitivity to our constituents’ needs,” Pelosi said sarcastically.
“I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging for food, begging for money,” Blitzer added.
“Have you fed them? We feed them. We feed them,” Pelosi said.
At this point, Blitzer mercifully ended the conversation before the House Speaker could humiliate herself further.
The entire exchange can be seen here:
This is a media training nightmare https://t.co/3zoU9KhRbT — Liam Donovan (@LPDonovan) October 13, 2020
Big League Politics has reported on Pelosi’s extreme contempt of the American people, which has worsened substantially in recent months as her mental faculties slip noticeably:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is blaming a salon, alleging an elaborate conspiracy against her, after she was caught breaking COVID-19 quarantine rules to get a haircut. “I take responsibility for trusting the word of a neighborhood salon,” Pelosi said to reporters on Wednesday. “It turns out it was a setup.” Pelosi was apparently clueless about the COVID-19 restrictions in her home state of California and went solely on the word of the salon, if her dubious story can be believed at all. “I take responsibility for trusting the word of a neighborhood salon that I’ve been to over the years many times,” Pelosi said. “I trusted that – as it turns out it was a setup,” she added. “So I take responsibility for falling for a setup and that’s all I’m going to say on that.” Now, she wants the salon to issue an apology to her for supposedly engaging in this elaborate conspiracy to make her look foolish and hypocritical. “I think this salon owes me an apology for setting up,” she said. Erica Kious, the California salon owner being criticized by Pelosi, is not likely to apologize. She appeared on Fox News to talk about Pelosi’s extreme contempt for the little people and her obvious belief that she is above the rules that others in non-privileged positions have to abide by. “It was a slap in the face that she went in, you know, that she feels that she can just go and get her stuff done while no-one else can go in, and I can’t work,” she said. In-door salon activity is still banned in the city of San Francisco, although outdoor haircuts are now permitted.
Pelosi has emerged as the Marie Antionette of the declining U.S. empire. Few career politicians are more open in their contempt of the American public than Pelosi.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Attorney: Whitmer Kidnapping Plot was ‘Pushed’ by FBI Informant Who Plotted ‘Crackpot’ Scheme

Big League Politics reported last week about the so-called kidnapping plot against Michigan Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer , pointing out that a confidential informant was paid $ 8,600 to ensnare some hapless overzealous individuals in the ridiculous scheme .
Defense attorney Scott Graham is sharing more details indicating that there was never any real kidnapping plot , only a handful of guys talking tough primarily in internet chat rooms .
Graham explained in federal court on Tuesday that the bogus plot was just the bluster of “ military wannabes ” who were “ never going to do anything.
” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
” defense attorney Scott Graham said to an FBI agent during cross-examination , adding : “ There ’ s kind of a military-wanna-be theme that runs between the militias.
” Trending : DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented FBI special agent Richard Trask could not explain how the plot was supposed to work while he was being cross-examined by Graham .
The feds seem to have pieced together some “ big talk ” in order to create the impression of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal crackdown against right-wing patriots while far-left Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA terrorists literally wage war against the Bill of Rights .
take our poll - story continues below Graham is representing 26-year-old Kaleb Franks , a resident of Waterford , Mich. who was denied bond on Tuesday by the judge .
Two of his alleged accomplices – Daniel Harris , 23 , of Lake Orion and Brandon Caserta , 32 , of Canton Township – were also denied bond .
Another attorney Gary Springstead , who is representing 24-year-old Ty Garbin of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more evidence yet to be seen that is being obfuscated by the feds .
“ I haven ’ t had a full opportunity to review all of the evidence , ” Springstead said “ … I think my co-counsel made good points that ( the evidence presented today ) is a snapshot .
A lot of quick points in a big time frame .
You don ’ t know what else is happening outside of that time frame .
“ So , I ’ m sure in our investigation ( which ) we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and not rely solely on the federal government to tell us what happened , we ’ ll try to round out that information and figure out what happened in the times that weren ’ t captured on tape that weren ’ t captured in text to put it into fuller context so we can better assess where we stand in the case , ” he added .
Big League Politics has reported on the possibility that these men were simply planning to conduct a lawful citizens ’ arrest on Whitmer : A constitutional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the thwarted raid against Governor Gretchen Whitmer that was promulgated by a confidential informant getting paid thousands of dollars by the feds .
While the plot itself is incredibly dubious and has all the makings of another FBI scam , Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf believes that making a citizens arrest on Whitmer is justified considering the onslaught of intolerable acts she has inflicted upon her constituents .
Leaf said he had dealt with some of the militia members and that they had always been nice and respectful when he had seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shocked .
I did not see this coming with those guys , but still , we can ’ t convict them in the news media here .
They do have the right to a fair trial , ” he said .
Leaf did not throw the militia members under the bus .
He said he does not regret sharing a stage with two of them at an anti-Whitmer rally earlier in the year , and he understands their motives considering Whitmer ’ s heinous abuses of her authority .
“ It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ And they say it ’ s a plot to kidnap .
You got to remember that , are they trying to kidnap , because a lot of people are angry with the governor , and they want her arrested .
So are they trying to arrest or was it a kidnap attempt ?
” Leaf asked .
“ You can still in Michigan , if it ’ s a felony , you can make a felony arrest , ” Leaf continued , citing Michigan state law to justify his point .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ if you ’ re in elected office that you ’ re exempt from that arrest .
So , I have to look at it from that angle , and I ’ m hoping that ’ s more of what it is .
As a matter of fact , these guys are innocent until proven guilty so I ’ m not even sure if they had any part of it , ” he added .
Expect the FBI to target and entrap more 2nd Amendment supporters in the days and months to come , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as much as their ANTIFA and BLM foot soldiers .

Attorney: Whitmer Kidnapping Plot was ‘Pushed’ by FBI Informant Who Plotted ‘Crackpot’ Scheme
Big League Politics reported last week about the so-called kidnapping plot against Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, pointing out that a confidential informant was paid $8,600 to ensnare some hapless overzealous individuals in the ridiculous scheme.
Defense attorney Scott Graham is sharing more details indicating that there was never any real kidnapping plot, only a handful of guys talking tough primarily in internet chat rooms. Graham explained in federal court on Tuesday that the bogus plot was just the bluster of “military wannabes” who were “never going to do anything.”
“Have you ever dealt with big talkers?” defense attorney Scott Graham said to an FBI agent during cross-examination, adding: “There’s kind of a military-wanna-be theme that runs between the militias.”
FBI special agent Richard Trask could not explain how the plot was supposed to work while he was being cross-examined by Graham. The feds seem to have pieced together some “big talk” in order to create the impression of a plot in order to justify a federal crackdown against right-wing patriots while far-left Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA terrorists literally wage war against the Bill of Rights.
Graham is representing 26-year-old Kaleb Franks, a resident of Waterford, Mich. who was denied bond on Tuesday by the judge. Two of his alleged accomplices – Daniel Harris, 23, of Lake Orion and Brandon Caserta, 32, of Canton Township – were also denied bond. Another attorney Gary Springstead, who is representing 24-year-old Ty Garbin of Hartland Township, believes there is much more evidence yet to be seen that is being obfuscated by the feds.
“I haven’t had a full opportunity to review all of the evidence,” Springstead said “… I think my co-counsel made good points that (the evidence presented today) is a snapshot. A lot of quick points in a big time frame. You don’t know what else is happening outside of that time frame.
“So, I’m sure in our investigation (which) we’re going to conduct ourselves, and not rely solely on the federal government to tell us what happened, we’ll try to round out that information and figure out what happened in the times that weren’t captured on tape that weren’t captured in text to put it into fuller context so we can better assess where we stand in the case,” he added.
Big League Politics has reported on the possibility that these men were simply planning to conduct a lawful citizens’ arrest on Whitmer:
A constitutional Michigan sheriff recently made some controversial comments about the thwarted raid against Governor Gretchen Whitmer that was promulgated by a confidential informant getting paid thousands of dollars by the feds. While the plot itself is incredibly dubious and has all the makings of another FBI scam, Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf believes that making a citizens arrest on Whitmer is justified considering the onslaught of intolerable acts she has inflicted upon her constituents. Leaf said he had dealt with some of the militia members and that they had always been nice and respectful when he had seen them at events. “I was shocked. I did not see this coming with those guys, but still, we can’t convict them in the news media here. They do have the right to a fair trial,” he said. Leaf did not throw the militia members under the bus. He said he does not regret sharing a stage with two of them at an anti-Whitmer rally earlier in the year, and he understands their motives considering Whitmer’s heinous abuses of her authority. “It’s just a charge,” Leaf explained. “And they say it’s a plot to kidnap. You got to remember that, are they trying to kidnap, because a lot of people are angry with the governor, and they want her arrested. So are they trying to arrest or was it a kidnap attempt?” Leaf asked. “You can still in Michigan, if it’s a felony, you can make a felony arrest,” Leaf continued, citing Michigan state law to justify his point. “And it doesn’t say if you’re in elected office that you’re exempt from that arrest. So, I have to look at it from that angle, and I’m hoping that’s more of what it is. As a matter of fact, these guys are innocent until proven guilty so I’m not even sure if they had any part of it,” he added.
Expect the FBI to target and entrap more 2nd Amendment supporters in the days and months to come, as the deep state hates the Constitution as much as their ANTIFA and BLM foot soldiers.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--America’s Rich are Living it Up While Millions of Americans are Suffering During Lockdowns

According to a piece by Tyler Durden on ZeroHedge , a massive wealth gap is emerging in America .
New figures from the Federal Reserve indicate how the entity has widened the wealth gap throughout the pandemic via its notorious quantitative easing program .
Indeed , the level of monetary stimulus has been extraordinary and it was justified on the grounds of keeping the economy propped up during the Wuhan virus lockdowns .
Durden notes that the result of this central bank intervention has been a “ K-shaped ” recovery , which has been “ disproportionately affecting low-wage service workers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , cent millionaires , and millionaires added record wealth.
” Central bank intervention has been great for stocks and asset prices , while those who are not asset owners have been forced to get by in the present-day instability .
Trending : DOJ : President Trump ’ s Proposed ‘ Total Declassification ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented Last week , Swiss bank UBS and accounting firm PwC released a new report documenting the level of wealth that the world ’ s 2,189 billionaires have accumulated thus far .
In July @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which overtook the $ 8.9 trillion record reached at the end of 2017. take our poll - story continues below Easy monetary policies , in combination with the economically debilitating lockdowns have only made these disparities worse .
According to Fed data , the top 1 percent of Americans are worth $ 34.2 trillion , whereas the poorest 50 percent , which is approximately 165 million people , have a net worth of $ 2.08 trillion .
This is less than 2 percent of all household wealth in America .
The top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a net worth of $ 2 trillion , per the Bloomberg Billionaires Index , which represents a $ 339 billion increase from the beginning of 2020 .
Elon Musk most notably saw his wealth increase from $ 75.6 billion to $ 103 billion .
Durden provided an overview of how massive the asset ownership gap is in America : The wealthiest 1 % saw their wealth erupt earlier this year as they own about 50 % of all stocks and mutual funds .
The top 9 % own about a third of stocks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Americans own about 88 % of stocks .
Policymakers need to start talking about the impact that central banking has had on America ’ s political economy and overall distribution of wealth .
The Cantillon Effect , whereby money printing and the resultant price increases creates uneven effects throughout the economy .
Those who profit from this effect are individuals close to the money — major corporations , banks , and investors .
These actors receive loans and proceed to invest , while the rest of the population doesn ’ t receive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and must readjust to the rising prices that come about as a result of the money printing .
This dynamic needs to be brought up more in economic discussions .
There ’ s a time and pace for talks about deregulation and tax cuts .
But these measures are not enough to stabilize America or protect its middle class .
A return to sound money is needed .

America’s Rich are Living it Up While Millions of Americans are Suffering During Lockdowns
According to a piece by Tyler Durden on ZeroHedge, a massive wealth gap is emerging in America.
New figures from the Federal Reserve indicate how the entity has widened the wealth gap throughout the pandemic via its notorious quantitative easing program. Indeed, the level of monetary stimulus has been extraordinary and it was justified on the grounds of keeping the economy propped up during the Wuhan virus lockdowns.
Durden notes that the result of this central bank intervention has been a “K-shaped” recovery, which has been “disproportionately affecting low-wage service workers and households of color, while billionaires, cent millionaires, and millionaires added record wealth.” Central bank intervention has been great for stocks and asset prices, while those who are not asset owners have been forced to get by in the present-day instability.
Last week, Swiss bank UBS and accounting firm PwC released a new report documenting the level of wealth that the world’s 2,189 billionaires have accumulated thus far. In July, that number reached $10.2 trillion, which overtook the $8.9 trillion record reached at the end of 2017.
Easy monetary policies, in combination with the economically debilitating lockdowns have only made these disparities worse. According to Fed data, the top 1 percent of Americans are worth $34.2 trillion, whereas the poorest 50 percent, which is approximately 165 million people, have a net worth of $2.08 trillion. This is less than 2 percent of all household wealth in America.
The top 50 wealthiest people in the U.S. have a net worth of $2 trillion, per the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, which represents a $339 billion increase from the beginning of 2020. Elon Musk most notably saw his wealth increase from $75.6 billion to $103 billion.
Durden provided an overview of how massive the asset ownership gap is in America:
The wealthiest 1% saw their wealth erupt earlier this year as they own about 50% of all stocks and mutual funds. The top 9% own about a third of stocks, which means the top 10% of Americans own about 88% of stocks.
Policymakers need to start talking about the impact that central banking has had on America’s political economy and overall distribution of wealth. The Cantillon Effect, whereby money printing and the resultant price increases creates uneven effects throughout the economy. Those who profit from this effect are individuals close to the money — major corporations, banks, and investors. These actors receive loans and proceed to invest, while the rest of the population doesn’t receive the newly printed for the time being and must readjust to the rising prices that come about as a result of the money printing. This dynamic needs to be brought up more in economic discussions. There’s a time and pace for talks about deregulation and tax cuts. But these measures are not enough to stabilize America or protect its middle class. A return to sound money is needed.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-14--Man Who FIRED FIRST in Fatal Kenosha Shootout is Charged With Gun Crime by Wisconsin Prosecutors

A man who shot a firearm at the fateful Kenosha , Wisconsin riot of August 25th has been charged with disorderly conduct and use of a dangerous weapon , according to new charging documents obtained by the Gateway Pundit .
Documents detailing charges against 35-year old Joshua Ziminski indicate that the man was seen on camera “ holding a black handgun , which he was holding in his left hand , pointing downward .
Detective Howard reports that in reviewing multiple other videos , he was able to see the defendant and Kelly Ziminski , in and around multiple other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defendant was seen holding the handgun down at his side in said videos.
” Kyle Rittenhouse , the militia-affiliated teenager since charged with multiple counts of murder , can be seen reacting to a gunshot- supposedly a “ warning shot ” moments before he was attacked by convicted child rapist Joseph Rosenbaum .
Rittenhouse shot and killed Rosenbaum after a brief struggle over the AR-style rifle he was carrying .
He shot two more leftist rioters who assailed him with guns and skateboards in the following moments .
Trending : DOJ : President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ of Russia-gate Documents Will Not Be Implemented Ziminski , who was present at the Jacob Blake race riot in Kenosha , would go on to admit to police investigating the Kenosha shootout that he had fired a “ warning shot ” that night .
His actions appear to have been crucial in instigating violence during the criminal riot , and it ’ s entirely possible that Rosenbaum may not have attacked Rittenhouse if not for the sudden occurrence of a warning shot .
take our poll - story continues below “ In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are seen walking near a fire in the area of the Ultimate Gas Station lot .
In later video , the defendant ’ s right arm is seen on the video , which is taken near 63rd Street and Sheridan Road , in the City and County of Kenosha , State of Wisconsin .
Detective Howard reports the defendant ’ s arm pointing the gun upward towards the sky , ” the charging document explains .
“ Detective Howard observed a muzzle flash emit from the handgun , and heard a gunshot at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the defendant is clearly seen at that same location .
The defendant is seen walking in the same area , holding his right arm upwards , and firing off one shot from his handgun .
The defendant and his wife are then seen leaving the area .
Several other people are in the nearby vicinity when the defendant fires the handgun.
” Most ( non-leftist ) gun owners are broadly aware that firing a “ warning shot ” in a dangerous situation is a poor situation more likely to instigate violence than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thought he was going to coerce an armed teenager into behavior of one form or another by firing shots in the sky .

Man Who FIRED FIRST in Fatal Kenosha Shootout is Charged With Gun Crime by Wisconsin Prosecutors
A man who shot a firearm at the fateful Kenosha, Wisconsin riot of August 25th has been charged with disorderly conduct and use of a dangerous weapon, according to new charging documents obtained by the Gateway Pundit.
Documents detailing charges against 35-year old Joshua Ziminski indicate that the man was seen on camera “holding a black handgun, which he was holding in his left hand, pointing downward. Detective Howard reports that in reviewing multiple other videos, he was able to see the defendant and Kelly Ziminski, in and around multiple other people on the streets, and the defendant was seen holding the handgun down at his side in said videos.”
Kyle Rittenhouse, the militia-affiliated teenager since charged with multiple counts of murder, can be seen reacting to a gunshot- supposedly a “warning shot” moments before he was attacked by convicted child rapist Joseph Rosenbaum. Rittenhouse shot and killed Rosenbaum after a brief struggle over the AR-style rifle he was carrying. He shot two more leftist rioters who assailed him with guns and skateboards in the following moments.
Ziminski, who was present at the Jacob Blake race riot in Kenosha, would go on to admit to police investigating the Kenosha shootout that he had fired a “warning shot” that night. His actions appear to have been crucial in instigating violence during the criminal riot, and it’s entirely possible that Rosenbaum may not have attacked Rittenhouse if not for the sudden occurrence of a warning shot.
“In another video, the defendant and Kelly are seen walking near a fire in the area of the Ultimate Gas Station lot. In later video, the defendant’s right arm is seen on the video, which is taken near 63rd Street and Sheridan Road, in the City and County of Kenosha, State of Wisconsin. Detective Howard reports the defendant’s arm pointing the gun upward towards the sky,” the charging document explains.
“Detective Howard observed a muzzle flash emit from the handgun, and heard a gunshot at the same time. In another video, the defendant is clearly seen at that same location. The defendant is seen walking in the same area, holding his right arm upwards, and firing off one shot from his handgun. The defendant and his wife are then seen leaving the area. Several other people are in the nearby vicinity when the defendant fires the handgun.”
Most (non-leftist) gun owners are broadly aware that firing a “warning shot” in a dangerous situation is a poor situation more likely to instigate violence than it is to prevent. This leftist thought he was going to coerce an armed teenager into behavior of one form or another by firing shots in the sky.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-15--CSPAN Suspends Debate Moderator Steve Scully After He Admits to Lying About Scaramucci Twitter “Hack

In another showing of proof that the fake news is in fact the enemy of the people , the New York Times Magazine has published an article arguing that the biggest threat to free speech…is free speech itself .
Feminist author Emily Bazelon believes that government and corporate censorship must be used to save free speech , and she made her case very poorly in an op/ed riddled with Orwellian doublespeak .
“ It ’ s an article of faith in the United States that more speech is better and that the government should regulate it as little as possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law , as well as social scientists , are beginning to question the way we have come to think about the First Amendment ’ s guarantee of free speech , ” Bazelon wrote , effectively arguing for an end to the Bill of Rights .
“ They think our formulations are simplistic — and especially inadequate for our era .
Censorship of external critics by the government remains a serious threat under authoritarian regimes .
But in the United States and other democracies , there is a different kind of threat , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discourse about politics , news and science .
It encompasses the mass distortion of truth and overwhelming waves of speech from extremists that smear and distract , ” she wrote , using left-wing blather to justify shredding the U.S. Constitution .
take our poll - story continues below Bazelon is arguing that since freedom of speech allows people like Trump and his supporters to speak freely , it must be sharply curtailed .
This way , her liberal agenda can be protected from any dissent or challenge that is allowed under the evil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , was written by slave owners ! )
.
“ This concern spans the ideological spectrum .
Along with disinformation campaigns , there is the separate problem of “ troll armies ” — a flood of commenters , often propelled by bots — that “ aim to discredit or to destroy the reputation of disfavored speakers and to discourage them from speaking again , ” Jack Goldsmith , a conservative law professor at Harvard , writes in an essay in “ The Perilous Public Square , ” a book edited by David E. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” she wrote .
Goldsmith , who Bazelon inaccurately describes as a conservative , is actually a prominent anti-Trump writer .
He even wrote a book , “ After Trump , ” calling for wholesale changes to the U.S. political system in order to make sure nobody like Trump can ever get elected again .
Bazelon argues that “ critical voices ” need to be protected from free speech in order to save free speech , or something .
She wrote : “ Either way , it ’ s often grimly effective at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tim Wu , a progressive law professor at Columbia , points out in the same book , the ‘ use of speech as a tool to suppress speech is , by its nature , something very challenging for the First Amendment to deal with . '
” “ As we hurtle toward the November election with a president who has trapped the country in a web of lies , with the sole purpose , it seems , of remaining in office , it ’ s time to ask whether the American way of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free , ” Bazelon wrote in her concluding paragraph .
She was pilloried in the reply section to her drivel on Twitter , in which she was correctly identified as a monster : It ’ s worth nothing that this is the type of speech that Bazelon wants to have censored .
This “ empowered woman ” can not handle being subject to scrutiny from outside of her privileged echo chamber .
Bazelon is another shining example of why ratifying the 19th Amendment may not have been such a great idea .

CSPAN Suspends Debate Moderator Steve Scully After He Admits to Lying About Scaramucci Twitter “Hack”
CSPAN journalist Steve Scully has been suspended by the network after admitting to lying about a supposed “hack” of his Twitter account. Scully, who had been slated to moderate the since-cancelled second presidential debate, had accidentally tweeted what was meant to be a direct message to anti-Trump hack Anthony Scaramucci.
Scully had been coordinating with Scaramucci about responding to President Trump’s criticism of the Commission on Presidential Debates, which commissioned establishment liberal Chris Wallace to moderate the first debate against Trump.
According to web archives, @SteveScully's tweet to @Scaramucci last night was sent via Twitter for iPhone The last ~20 tweets posted by Scully's account were all sent via Twitter for iPhone.https://t.co/nzvG9vcosx pic.twitter.com/RWIsKUt6qJ — Andrew Kerr (@AndrewKerrNC) October 9, 2020
CSPAN announced that Scully would be suspended indefinitely from the network for the hacked account lie. Reports emerged suggesting that both the FBI and Twitter began investigating the purported hack after Scully made the false claim. It’s entirely possible that a brief investigation would have left Scully caught red-handed, forced to explain his dishonest remark to CSPAN as well as federal law enforcement.
Scully released an apology for his lie on Thursday, admitting that the “hack” claim had been false from the beginning.
Verified establishment journalists- some of them nominal “conservatives-” had been quick to defend Scully after he was accused of lying about the “hack,” claiming the mainstream media operative had unimpeachable integrity.
Steve Scully just admitted he was not hacked and he lied. Let's take a walk down memory lane of all the blue checks who carried water for him… pic.twitter.com/Cig2Pry2Tv — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) October 15, 2020
The Commission on Presidential Debates has entirely shed any and all credibility it had with conservatives. It used a moderator that was secretly coordinating political messaging with a partisan liberal.
Unfortunately, there’s little to no accountability in the world of prestige establishment media, and Scully will likely be back as an MSNBC commentator next year in the vein of Dan Rather and Brian Williams.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-15--Colorado Leftist Matthew Dolloff Formally Charged With Second-Degree Murder in Shooting of Conservat

It has been revealed that the killer of a Trump supporter at a Colorado Trump rally on Saturday was not a private security official , contrary to the claims made by 9NEWS .
Denver city officials have confirmed that the killer was not a licensed private security worker in the state of Colorado : take our poll - story continues below One America News Network journalist Jack Posobiec noted that 9NEWS will likely be in tremendous legal trouble over their use of an ANTIFA-style thug to provide security for their reporters : Big League Politics reported on Saturday when a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news media shot a supporter of President Donald Trump dead during a contentious rally in Colorado on Saturday .
Matthew Dolloff , 30 , is being held at the Downtown Detention Center in Denver , Colo. after he shot a man dead near the Denver Art Museum on Saturday .
He was contracted through 9NEWS to accompany staff members at the rally .
This shows how the fake news media is quite literally at war with patriotic Americans .
Lee Keltner , a military veteran and hat maker , has been identified as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the event with his 24-year-old son when he was executed in cold blood .
The Denver Police Department ( DPD ) noted that they have charged Dolloff with first-degree murder and are investigating the incident : “ The Denver Police Department respects the right to peacefully assemble .
Those who participate in protests , demonstrations , marches , or other gatherings , as protected by the First Amendment , are reminded to do so in a lawful manner .
Individuals who choose to act outside of local , state and federal law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrest , ” the DPD said in a statement .
Video of the immediate aftermath of the gruesome shooting can be seen here : The patriot rally was set for 2pm in Denver on Saturday afternoon and was met with a so-called “ BLM-Antifa Soup Drive ” at 1:30pm in an attempt to disrupt the patriotic gathering .
This time , it was not the ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter terrorists who murdered the pro-Trump patriot .
The fake news media did the dirty work for the left-wing domestic terrorists this time around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indicate that the Trump supporter who was killed was standing his ground before he was accosted by the journalist and had to use bear mace to stand his ground .
At this point , he was apparently executed by the rent-a-cop thug getting paid off by the fake news .
Big League Politics has reported on how Trump supporters are being murdered in the streets by left-wing forces , who are then lionized by Democrat activists with their violent actions minimized by the fake news media : A man who has referred to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is under investigation by the Portland Police for involvement of Patriot Prayer conservative demonstrator Jay Bishop on Saturday night .
The Oregonian confirmed that the Portland Police are investigating Michael Forest Reinohl for the possibility of his involvement .
Reinohl has not been arrested or charged as of early Monday morning… Reinohl was arrested at a July Antifa riot in the city previously this summer , and was charged with possessing a loaded gun in a public place , resisting arrest , and interfering with police .
Portland DA Mike Schmidt has pledged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of rioters arrested in the city , and the criminal charges against Reinohl were dropped in turn .
Photography of Reinohl ’ s arrest in July shows the 48-year being arrested in the presence of a gun .
Reinohl has previously posted of his support for left-wing militancy and violent protest , identifying himself as “ 100 % Antifa ” on his Instagram page .
“ I am 100 % ANTIFA all the way !
I am willing to fight for my brothers and sisters !
Even if some of them are too @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for.
” Even while Trump supporters are being executed by leftists , the FBI frequently demonizes white patriots and runs bogus entrapment operations to create fear among the unsuspecting public .
The institutional and systemic oppression against Trump supporters and American patriots is unlike anything the nation has ever seen .
The leftist fifth column embedded throughout society is advancing rapidly to destroy the U.S .

Colorado Leftist Matthew Dolloff Formally Charged With Second-Degree Murder in Shooting of Conservative Demonstrator
The unlicensed “security guard” who was caught on camera shooting a conservative demonstrator in the head during a Denver, Colorado ANTIFA event has been formally charged with second-degree murder in the killing of US Navy veteran and hatmaker Lee Keltner.
30-year old Matthew Dolloff had been held in the Denver jail system on suspicion of first-degree murder as police investigated the shooting. The Denver District Attorney announced the charges on Thursday. If convicted, Dolloff face a mandatory prison sentence of between 16 and 48 years.
#Breaking: @DenverDAsOffice announces Matthew Dolloff will be charged with 2nd degree murder. If convicted, it carries a mandatory prison sentence of between 16- 48 years.
#dolloff #denvershooting pic.twitter.com/XZ7pQkDzcT — Brian Maass (@Briancbs4) October 15, 2020
Big League Politics has identified Dolloff’s extreme left-wing views. The Denver police had originally identified him as merely a security guard with “no affiliation with ANTIFA,” but his social media postings reveal him to be a leftist ideologue with a potent dislike for Donald Trump supporters.
During the shooting, Dolloff was working as a “private security guard” for NBC News affiliate 9NEWS Denver. The liberal television station later admitted that they didn’t know the leftist ideologue they employed was armed, and that he was not properly licensed to act as a private security guard in the city of Denver.
The evidence for a murder conviction against Dolloff is strong, considering he’s on camera shooting Keltner. The Patriot Prayer demonstrator had merely slapped and shoved off the leftist- who, for some reason, was intervening in a verbal confrontation between Keltner and a Black Lives Matter demonstrator. The far leftist proceeded to draw a handgun and shoot Keltner in the head.
It’s entirely conceivable that Dolloff’s leftist views played a key role in his heinous shooting of a small businessman and patriot who was peacefully protesting in Denver’s civic center.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-15--Trump Administration Will ‘Clarify’ Section 230 Regulations After Big Tech’s Electoral Interference

The Trump administration announced on Thursday that the Federal Communications Commission will be issuing a clarification regarding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act , which has given special immunities to Big Tech firms which exempt from liability for content published on their platforms .
“ Members of all three branches of the federal government have expressed serious concerns about the prevailing interpretation of the immunity set forth in Section 230 of the Communications Act .
There is bipartisan support in Congress to reform the law .
The U.S. Department of Commerce has petitioned the Commission to ‘ clarify ambiguities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week , U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas pointed out that courts have relied upon ‘ policy and purpose arguments to grant sweeping protections to Internet platforms ’ that appear to go far beyond the actual text of the provision , ” FCC Chairman Ajit Pai wrote in a statement .
“ As elected officials consider whether to change the law , the question remains : What does Section 230 currently mean ?
Many advance an overly broad interpretation that in some cases shields social media companies from consumer protection laws in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ text of Section 230 .
The Commission ’ s General Counsel has informed me that the FCC has the legal authority to interpret Section 230 .
Consistent with this advice , I intend to move forward with a rulemaking to clarify its meaning , ” he added .
Trending : WOW : Computer Repairman Who Exposed Biden Emails Says FBI Told Him to Stay Quiet Pai noted that his clarification of Section 230 is in concordance with his limited government ethos .
Section 230 is a bureaucratic regulation set up by big government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and form monopolies by design .
take our poll - story continues below “ Throughout my tenure at the Federal Communications Commission , I have favored regulatory parity , transparency , and free expression .
Social media companies have a First Amendment right to free speech .
But they do not have a First Amendment right to a special immunity denied to other media outlets , such as newspapers and broadcasters , ” Pai wrote .
His official statement can be seen here : Pro-Big Brother liberals are now painting themselves as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ property in an attempt to protect Silicon Valley ’ s right to censor .
One such shameful example comes from TechDirt , an outlet that opposes Section 230 reform .
“ He ’ s a lying hypocrite with no principles , no backbone , and should be regarded as a complete joke , ” TechDirt reporter Mike Masnick wrote in his tantrum about Pai .
“ In terms of actual impact , all this will serve to do is rile people up , waste a ton of time , and not actually change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But it will create a huge mess in the meantime , distracting everybody , and wasting a ton of resource , ” he added .
Perhaps the public should be riled up about Big Tech censorship since it has emerged as an existential threat to democracy , which Big League Politics has noted : A day after censoring the New York Post for exposing Hunter Biden ’ s emails , Twitter has doubled down by censoring a newly published article that explains Hunter ’ s crony and possibly illicit business dealings with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — again , ” announced Post editor Sohrab Ahmari in a tweet .
“ This is what I — an editor at America ’ s oldest continuously published newspaper , founded by Alexander Hamilton — get when I try to post our follow-up story on Hunter ’ s financial shenanigans with the Chinese regime , ” he added .
When Ahmari attempted to post the article , he received a “ Tweet Not Sent ” notice that read as follows : “ Your Tweet could not be sent because this link has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being potentially harmful .
Visit our Help Center to learn more.
” The Post report details Hunter ’ s interactions with a powerful Chinese energy firm .
The revelations in the article indicate that Hunter was receiving millions from Chinese interests because of his name .
The Biden campaign is attempting to ignore the scandal while the Big Tech overlords attempt to keep the news from going viral .
“ There is no need for comment on any so-called information provided by Rudy Giuliani , ” Biden lawyer George Mesires said .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theories about the Biden family , openly relying on actors tied to Russian intelligence .
His record of dishonesty in these matters speaks for itself , ” Mesires added .
It is very telling that liberals only support private property and the free market when companies are enacting Draconian censorship and effectively nullifying the 1st Amendment .
ISIS has nothing on the Democrat Party when it comes to hostility toward American values .

Trump Administration Will ‘Clarify’ Section 230 Regulations After Big Tech’s Electoral Interference
The Trump administration announced on Thursday that the Federal Communications Commission will be issuing a clarification regarding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which has given special immunities to Big Tech firms which exempt from liability for content published on their platforms.
“Members of all three branches of the federal government have expressed serious concerns about the prevailing interpretation of the immunity set forth in Section 230 of the Communications Act. There is bipartisan support in Congress to reform the law. The U.S. Department of Commerce has petitioned the Commission to ‘clarify ambiguities in section 230.’ And earlier this week, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas pointed out that courts have relied upon ‘policy and purpose arguments to grant sweeping protections to Internet platforms’ that appear to go far beyond the actual text of the provision,” FCC Chairman Ajit Pai wrote in a statement.
“As elected officials consider whether to change the law, the question remains: What does Section 230 currently mean? Many advance an overly broad interpretation that in some cases shields social media companies from consumer protection laws in a way that has no basis in the text of Section 230. The Commission’s General Counsel has informed me that the FCC has the legal authority to interpret Section 230. Consistent with this advice, I intend to move forward with a rulemaking to clarify its meaning,” he added.
Pai noted that his clarification of Section 230 is in concordance with his limited government ethos. Section 230 is a bureaucratic regulation set up by big government to allow powerful corporations to shirk liabilities and form monopolies by design.
“Throughout my tenure at the Federal Communications Commission, I have favored regulatory parity, transparency, and free expression. Social media companies have a First Amendment right to free speech. But they do not have a First Amendment right to a special immunity denied to other media outlets, such as newspapers and broadcasters,” Pai wrote.
His official statement can be seen here:
I intend to move forward with an @FCC rulemaking to clarify the meaning of #Section230. Read my full statement below. pic.twitter.com/LhUz5XMdSC — Ajit Pai (@AjitPai) October 15, 2020
Pro-Big Brother liberals are now painting themselves as the defenders of the free market and private property in an attempt to protect Silicon Valley’s right to censor. One such shameful example comes from TechDirt, an outlet that opposes Section 230 reform.
“He’s a lying hypocrite with no principles, no backbone, and should be regarded as a complete joke,” TechDirt reporter Mike Masnick wrote in his tantrum about Pai.
“In terms of actual impact, all this will serve to do is rile people up, waste a ton of time, and not actually change anything. Because it can’t. But it will create a huge mess in the meantime, distracting everybody, and wasting a ton of resource,” he added.
Perhaps the public should be riled up about Big Tech censorship since it has emerged as an existential threat to democracy, which Big League Politics has noted:
A day after censoring the New York Post for exposing Hunter Biden’s emails, Twitter has doubled down by censoring a newly published article that explains Hunter’s crony and possibly illicit business dealings with China. “Twitter is censoring us — again,” announced Post editor Sohrab Ahmari in a tweet. “This is what I — an editor at America’s oldest continuously published newspaper, founded by Alexander Hamilton — get when I try to post our follow-up story on Hunter’s financial shenanigans with the Chinese regime,” he added. When Ahmari attempted to post the article, he received a “Tweet Not Sent” notice that read as follows: “Your Tweet could not be sent because this link has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful. Visit our Help Center to learn more.” The Post report details Hunter’s interactions with a powerful Chinese energy firm. The revelations in the article indicate that Hunter was receiving millions from Chinese interests because of his name. The Biden campaign is attempting to ignore the scandal while the Big Tech overlords attempt to keep the news from going viral. “There is no need for comment on any so-called information provided by Rudy Giuliani,” Biden lawyer George Mesires said. “He has been pushing widely discredited conspiracy theories about the Biden family, openly relying on actors tied to Russian intelligence. His record of dishonesty in these matters speaks for itself,” Mesires added.
It is very telling that liberals only support private property and the free market when companies are enacting Draconian censorship and effectively nullifying the 1st Amendment. ISIS has nothing on the Democrat Party when it comes to hostility toward American values.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-10-15--Computer Repairman Who Uncovered Hunter Biden’s Emails Feared He Would Be Murdered to Suppress Revel

John Paul MacIsaac , the 44-year-old Trump supporter who discovered a tranche of embarrassing and perhaps incriminating Hunter Biden emails , is saying he feared for his life after making the discovery .
MacIsaac has revealed that he feared he would get offed for being “ a guy who had something he wanted out of this shop.
” While the Clinton kill count has been widely popularized , the Biden kill count is less talked about .
MacIsaac feared he would be added to the rather lengthy list of Democrat political enemies who suddenly died under mysterious circumstances .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to some people that I trusted , that could possibly get me in touch with the FBI , ” MacIssac said to the Daily Beast .
“ Then they showed up.
” Trending : WOW : Computer Repairman Who Exposed Biden Emails Says FBI Told Him to Stay Quiet “ They probably knew I had a copy because I was pretty vocal about not wanting to get murdered , ” MacIsaac added .
take our poll - story continues below MacIsaac said he informed the FBI about the laptop and its explosive contents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about how Trump attorney and America ’ s Mayor Rudy Giuliani received the documents and handed them over to the New York Post .
Big League Politics has reported on how monolithic social media platforms have snapped into action to censor the news of Hunter Biden ’ s emails at breakneck speed : Sens .
Ted Cruz ( R-TX ) , Lindsey Graham ( R-SC ) , and Josh Hawley ( R-MO ) announced to reporters on Thursday that they intend to subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey over his social media platform ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We have seen Big Tech , we have seen Twitter and Facebook actively interfering in this election in a way that has no precedent in this country , ” Cruz told the reporters .
Cruz explained the situation with regards to the New York Post and their story about Hunter Biden and the implications for former vice president and Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden .
“ Never before have we seen active censorship of a major press publication with serious allegations of one of the two candidates for president .
That was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cruz explained how Twitter has doubled down with even more censorship against the Post after they released a follow-up article on Thursday detailing Hunter Biden ’ s crony deals with Chinese interests .
“ This is election interference , and we are 19 days out from an election .
It has no precedent in the history of democracy , ” Cruz said .
Cruz noted he is working with Graham , who is Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee , to ready a subpoena for Dorsey to testify regarding his company ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Let me be clear : I don ’ t know if these New York Post stories are true or not .
Those are questions Vice President Biden should answer , but Twitter and Facebook and Big Tech billionaires don ’ t get to censor political speech and actively interfere in the election .
That ’ s what they are doing right now , ” he said .
“ The point is that the power behind these platforms has been taken to a level that truly is dangerous , I think , the stopping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them from exercising their ability to share information with their friends , ” Graham said .
“ I think a subpoena from the judiciary committee is absolutely appropriate and in order .
It is absolutely vital .
We believe in a free press in this country .
We also believe in free elections , and the attempt to rig an election , which is what we are seeing here , by monopolies is unprecedented in American history , ” Hawley said , adding that Facebook should be subpoenaed along with Twitter .
MacIsaac @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safety .
The Democrats and their allies will stop at nothing to oust President Trump from office .

Computer Repairman Who Uncovered Hunter Biden’s Emails Feared He Would Be Murdered to Suppress Revelations
John Paul MacIsaac, the 44-year-old Trump supporter who discovered a tranche of embarrassing and perhaps incriminating Hunter Biden emails, is saying he feared for his life after making the discovery.
MacIsaac has revealed that he feared he would get offed for being “a guy who had something he wanted out of this shop.” While the Clinton kill count has been widely popularized, the Biden kill count is less talked about. MacIsaac feared he would be added to the rather lengthy list of Democrat political enemies who suddenly died under mysterious circumstances.
“I was afraid, I reached out to some people that I trusted, that could possibly get me in touch with the FBI,” MacIssac said to the Daily Beast. “Then they showed up.”
“They probably knew I had a copy because I was pretty vocal about not wanting to get murdered,” MacIsaac added.
MacIsaac said he informed the FBI about the laptop and its explosive contents. He refused to go into details about how Trump attorney and America’s Mayor Rudy Giuliani received the documents and handed them over to the New York Post.
Big League Politics has reported on how monolithic social media platforms have snapped into action to censor the news of Hunter Biden’s emails at breakneck speed:
Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Josh Hawley (R-MO) announced to reporters on Thursday that they intend to subpoena Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey over his social media platform’s Draconian policies against free speech. “We have seen Big Tech, we have seen Twitter and Facebook actively interfering in this election in a way that has no precedent in this country,” Cruz told the reporters. Cruz explained the situation with regards to the New York Post and their story about Hunter Biden and the implications for former vice president and Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden. “Never before have we seen active censorship of a major press publication with serious allegations of one of the two candidates for president. That was last night,” he said. Cruz explained how Twitter has doubled down with even more censorship against the Post after they released a follow-up article on Thursday detailing Hunter Biden’s crony deals with Chinese interests. “This is election interference, and we are 19 days out from an election. It has no precedent in the history of democracy,” Cruz said. Cruz noted he is working with Graham, who is Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to ready a subpoena for Dorsey to testify regarding his company’s hostile business practices next Friday. “Let me be clear: I don’t know if these New York Post stories are true or not. Those are questions Vice President Biden should answer, but Twitter and Facebook and Big Tech billionaires don’t get to censor political speech and actively interfere in the election. That’s what they are doing right now,” he said. “The point is that the power behind these platforms has been taken to a level that truly is dangerous, I think, the stopping Americans from having these tools available to them from exercising their ability to share information with their friends,” Graham said. “I think a subpoena from the judiciary committee is absolutely appropriate and in order. It is absolutely vital. We believe in a free press in this country. We also believe in free elections, and the attempt to rig an election, which is what we are seeing here, by monopolies is unprecedented in American history,” Hawley said, adding that Facebook should be subpoenaed along with Twitter.
MacIsaac was correct to be concerned about his safety. The Democrats and their allies will stop at nothing to oust President Trump from office.