bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-14--Governor Coonman is Leading Virginia into Political Civil War

Since the Charlottesville protests of 2017 , the Left has been on a monument removal craze , which conservative Pat Buchanan noted in a recent column .
With Democrats in firm control of the state legislature , they will likely shove their PC agenda down Virginians ’ throats .
Buchanan calls attention to how first-term Congresswoman Jennifer Wexton has criticized U.S. capitol statues of George Washington and Robert E. Lee .
Trending : ANTIFA Terror Leader Gets a Promotion After His Identity is Revealed to the Public Both statues have been significant artifacts of Virginian history for over a century @ @ @ @ @ @ @ - story continues below Instead , Wexton wants to replace Lee with an African American hero from a list that she and Congressman A. Donald McEachin submitted .
Two of those on the list are lesser-known figures from the desegregation era of the 1950s .
The third is the renowned historical figure Nat Turner .
In “ The Americans : A Social History of the United States , ” published in 1969 , author J. C. Furnas gives a politically incorrect perspective to the life of Nat Turner : “ The poor twisted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time to sharpen Southern fears of a slave rising , ” wrote Furnas .
The Virginia legislature ended up rejecting bill that would gradually phase out slavery by a narrow margin .
Turner would be tried and hanged after he was caught .
Buchanan argued that “ If the Virginia General Assembly votes to replace Robert E. Lee in the U.S. Capitol with a statue of Nat Turner , it will not be the unifying event Wexton imagines.
” However , things are getting heated on other fronts .
On January 20th , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” at the Assembly , where thousands of gun advocates will gather in Richmond to protest Northam and his new Democrat majority ’ s gun control proposals .
BLP reported that about 91 counties have created “ Second Amendment sanctuaries ” where local authorities are expected to not enforce prospective infringements on the Second Amendment by the state legislature .
Virginia is a former Confederate State with strong rural traditions and lax gun laws .
Guns represent the strongest , reddest line against the demographic changes that have seen Old Dominion voters usher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in recent elections .
A Nevada-based group called the Oath Keepers said it is sending training teams to help form posses and militia in Virginia .
The leader of a Georgia militia called Three Percent Security Force has posted videos and calls to arms on Facebook , urging ‘ patriots ’ to converge on Richmond .
It ’ s not just guns and history that Virginians are divided over .
Last year , Northam voiced his support for abortion through the first nine months of pregnancy .
He took it a step further @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unsuccessful .
Northam made his views about the rights of the unborn clear : ( Third trimester abortions are ) done in cases where there may be severe deformities .
There may be a fetus that ’ s nonviable .
So in this particular example , if a mother is in labor , I can tell you exactly what would happen .
… The infant would be delivered .
The infant would be kept comfortable .
The infant would be resuscitated if that ’ s what the mother and the family desired .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the physicians and the mother .
Political tensions are so high in Virginia that Buchanan believes “ a new secession is underway ” because “ Virginians are separating from each other over issues as deep and divisive — such as who can take innocent life and when — as those that divided us in 1861.
” Although calls for secession will likely not morph into anything concrete in the short-term , Virginia is clearly politically polarized at the moment .
The 2020 session of the Virginia General Assembly will be a heated affair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Governor Coonman is Leading Virginia into Political Civil War
Since the Charlottesville protests of 2017, the Left has been on a monument removal craze, which conservative Pat Buchanan noted in a recent column.
With Democrats in firm control of the state legislature, they will likely shove their PC agenda down Virginians’ throats.
Buchanan calls attention to how first-term Congresswoman Jennifer Wexton has criticized U.S. capitol statues of George Washington and Robert E. Lee.
Both statues have been significant artifacts of Virginian history for over a century at Washington, D.C.
Instead, Wexton wants to replace Lee with an African American hero from a list that she and Congressman A. Donald McEachin submitted.
Two of those on the list are lesser-known figures from the desegregation era of the 1950s. The third is the renowned historical figure Nat Turner.
In “The Americans: A Social History of the United States,” published in 1969, author J. C. Furnas gives a politically incorrect perspective to the life of Nat Turner:
In August 1831, Nat Turner, paranoid slave preacher and cunjur man, led his superstition-fuddled followers to kill fifty-five whites of all sexes and ages in an aimless terrorizing of Southhampton County in the southeastern corner of Virginia.
“The poor twisted creature could hardly have found a worse time to sharpen Southern fears of a slave rising,” wrote Furnas. The Virginia legislature ended up rejecting bill that would gradually phase out slavery by a narrow margin.
Turner would be tried and hanged after he was caught.
Nat Turner’s terrorist actions had effectively delayed emancipation.
Buchanan argued that “If the Virginia General Assembly votes to replace Robert E. Lee in the U.S. Capitol with a statue of Nat Turner, it will not be the unifying event Wexton imagines.”
However, things are getting heated on other fronts.
On January 20th, there will be a “Lobby Day” at the Assembly, where thousands of gun advocates will gather in Richmond to protest Northam and his new Democrat majority’s gun control proposals.
BLP reported that about 91 counties have created “Second Amendment sanctuaries” where local authorities are expected to not enforce prospective infringements on the Second Amendment by the state legislature.
The Washington Post wrote:
Virginia is a former Confederate State with strong rural traditions and lax gun laws. Guns represent the strongest, reddest line against the demographic changes that have seen Old Dominion voters usher in a new era of Democratic leadership in recent elections. A Nevada-based group called the Oath Keepers said it is sending training teams to help form posses and militia in Virginia. The leader of a Georgia militia called Three Percent Security Force has posted videos and calls to arms on Facebook, urging ‘patriots’ to converge on Richmond.
It’s not just guns and history that Virginians are divided over.
Last year, Northam voiced his support for abortion through the first nine months of pregnancy. He took it a step further by supporting abortion even if it was unsuccessful.
Northam made his views about the rights of the unborn clear:
(Third trimester abortions are) done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s nonviable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. … The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.
Political tensions are so high in Virginia that Buchanan believes “a new secession is underway” because “Virginians are separating from each other over issues as deep and divisive — such as who can take innocent life and when — as those that divided us in 1861.”
Although calls for secession will likely not morph into anything concrete in the short-term, Virginia is clearly politically polarized at the moment.
The 2020 session of the Virginia General Assembly will be a heated affair no matter how we look at it.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--Michael Avenatti Arrested AGAIN At California Bar Hearing

Showboat attorney and former cable news mainstay Michael Avenatti was arrested once again at a meeting of the California Bar Association on Tuesday .
Avenatti had been attending a disciplinary hearing at the bar , facing charges of defrauding a former client that could cost him his ability to actively practice as a lawyer in California .
But it seems the bar association is the least of his problems .
The former liberal hot shot was arrested on the basis of violating the terms of his pretrial conditions .
Avenatti is already facing criminal charges for accusations of frauding clients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ company Nike .
Photos emerged Tuesday of Avenatti being escorted away in an elevator by federal agents .
He told onlookers as he was led out from the Los Angeles courthouse that he was “ totally innocent.
” take our poll - story continues below It ’ s unclear how Avenatti violated the terms of his pretrial release , but United States Attorney Geoffrey Berman confirmed that as the cause of his arrest in a document filed with the federal court system .
Being arrested while fighting disbarment proceedings is a considerable fall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ street fighter , ” who was promoted as a possible Presidential candidate by leading liberal pundits as late as 2018 .
Avenatti explored a potential candidacy , only to back down when his recent string of legal struggles began .
The hotshot bigmouth could be facing penalties up to life in prison for his attempted extortion of Nike , although it ’ s likely he ’ ll get off his a slap on the wrist .
One of Avenatti ’ s most bitter rivals , Donald Trump Jr , had a laugh at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was revealed the showboat was arrested yet again .
It appears likely that the Democratic hotshot of yesterday will spend the election he planned on being a candidate in behind bars .

Michael Avenatti Arrested AGAIN At California Bar Hearing
Showboat attorney and former cable news mainstay Michael Avenatti was arrested once again at a meeting of the California Bar Association on Tuesday.
Avenatti had been attending a disciplinary hearing at the bar, facing charges of defrauding a former client that could cost him his ability to actively practice as a lawyer in California.
But it seems the bar association is the least of his problems. The former liberal hot shot was arrested on the basis of violating the terms of his pretrial conditions. Avenatti is already facing criminal charges for accusations of frauding clients, including an attempt to extort sporting company Nike.
Photos emerged Tuesday of Avenatti being escorted away in an elevator by federal agents. He told onlookers as he was led out from the Los Angeles courthouse that he was “totally innocent.”
It’s unclear how Avenatti violated the terms of his pretrial release, but United States Attorney Geoffrey Berman confirmed that as the cause of his arrest in a document filed with the federal court system.
New filing in United States v. Avenatti: Letterhttps://t.co/z08KawGNYu pic.twitter.com/0uCPdbJP6m — Big Cases Bot (@big_cases) January 15, 2020
Being arrested while fighting disbarment proceedings is a considerable fall from fame for the bellicose Democrat “street fighter,” who was promoted as a possible Presidential candidate by leading liberal pundits as late as 2018. Avenatti explored a potential candidacy, only to back down when his recent string of legal struggles began.
The hotshot bigmouth could be facing penalties up to life in prison for his attempted extortion of Nike, although it’s likely he’ll get off his a slap on the wrist.
One of Avenatti’s most bitter rivals, Donald Trump Jr, had a laugh at his former nemesis’ expense when it was revealed the showboat was arrested yet again.
M.A.G.A: Michael Avenatti Got Arrested Again. https://t.co/CxKwx0Cxq2 — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) January 15, 2020
It appears likely that the Democratic hotshot of yesterday will spend the election he planned on being a candidate in behind bars.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--California County Wants to Bribe People Out of their Homes and Replace Them with Hobos

According to CBS SF BAYArea , “ All three properties have one thing in common .
They ’ re big and have multiple units , but many of those units are currently occupied by tenants.
” “ I ’ m sure the tenants have been asked to leave , ” Allen Thomas commented .
He lives close to one of the three properties , 811 Davis Street in Santa Rosa .
Neighbors said it ’ s a bad idea to evict renters to house the homeless .
“ It ’ s just insanity , ” declared Karen Sanders , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our poll - story continues below Sonoma County leaders have plans on buying two properties in Santa Rosa and one in Cotati .
They are expected to pay approximately one million dollars for each property .
One county worker noted that they ’ re already contracted to buy property on Davis Street .
“ Million dollar homes ; million dollar homes for these transients living on the trail , ” Sanders stated .
The county wants to clear the Joe Rodota Trail of the homeless .
Many neighbors where those three properties are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potentially make the neighborhoods less safe and reduce the overall quality of life .
“ I ’ m not NIMBY , but we ’ ve done enough , ” declared Sher Ennis , a neighbor who lives close the Davis street property .
Davis claims a man from a re-entry housing program attacked her home a few years ago .
She is concerned about her safety .
“ We don ’ t know .
Are we getting dangerous criminals ?
Are we getting felons ?
Or are we getting people who are simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ennis .
However , another neighbor is in favor of the county ’ s plan .
“ I don ’ t think that it makes [ the neighborhood ] any less safe , no , ” said Andrew Atkinson .
He believes that the county must take immediate action “ It ’ s going to take more than this , I think , to solve the problem .
But I ’ m glad to see they ’ re trying , ” said Atkinson .
Many upset neighbors have plans to express their concerns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Santa Rosa .
County leaders plan on discussing about the plan to buy the houses and other housing alternatives in dealing with the homeless .

California County Wants to Bribe People Out of their Homes and Replace Them with Hobos
According to CBS SF BAYArea, “All three properties have one thing in common. They’re big and have multiple units, but many of those units are currently occupied by tenants.”
“I’m sure the tenants have been asked to leave,” Allen Thomas commented. He lives close to one of the three properties, 811 Davis Street in Santa Rosa.
Neighbors said it’s a bad idea to evict renters to house the homeless.
“It’s just insanity,” declared Karen Sanders, who also resides in Santa Rosa.
Sonoma County leaders have plans on buying two properties in Santa Rosa and one in Cotati. They are expected to pay approximately one million dollars for each property. One county worker noted that they’re already contracted to buy property on Davis Street.
“Million dollar homes; million dollar homes for these transients living on the trail,” Sanders stated.
The county wants to clear the Joe Rodota Trail of the homeless. Many neighbors where those three properties are located worry that the new neighbors could potentially make the neighborhoods less safe and reduce the overall quality of life.
“I’m not NIMBY, but we’ve done enough,” declared Sher Ennis, a neighbor who lives close the Davis street property.
Davis claims a man from a re-entry housing program attacked her home a few years ago. She is concerned about her safety.
“We don’t know. Are we getting dangerous criminals? Are we getting felons? Or are we getting people who are simply down on their luck,” said Ennis.
However, another neighbor is in favor of the county’s plan.
“I don’t think that it makes [the neighborhood] any less safe, no,” said Andrew Atkinson.
He believes that the county must take immediate action
“It’s going to take more than this, I think, to solve the problem. But I’m glad to see they’re trying,” said Atkinson.
Many upset neighbors have plans to express their concerns at a community meeting Friday night in Santa Rosa.
County leaders plan on discussing about the plan to buy the houses and other housing alternatives in dealing with the homeless.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--Machete-Wielding Iranian Arrested Near Mar-a-Lago Initially Came to America as a Refugee

An Iranian national who was found with a machete , knives , an ax , and roughly $ 22,000 in cash in a gazebo outside of President Trump ’ s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida has been revealed as an individual who initially arrived in the U.S. as a refugee .
Masoud Yarieilzoleh , 38 , was arrested on Jan. 10 by the Palm Beach Police Department , according to reporting from the Palm Beach Post .
Police searched Yarieilzoleh , found the weapons , arrested him , and charged him with carrying a concealed weapon .
He has since been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pending a court appearance next month .
Law enforcement sources have confirmed to Breitbart News that Yarieilzoleh came to the U.S. as a refugee in 2014 .
He received a green card from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( USCIS ) two years later , and this machete wielder then obtained permanent lawful residence in the U.S. from that point onward .
Former President Barack Hussein Obama allowed the resettlement of over 25,000 refugees from Iran into the U.S. even though the Islamic Republic has been listed as a sponsor of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The refugee resettlement program is notoriously corrupt and determined largely by bribes rather than legitimate humanitarian considerations .
take our poll - story continues below Nevertheless , governors in red states throughout the country are opening the doors for refugees .
Participation in the refugee resettlement program is now voluntary following the enactment of executive order 13888 issued by President Trump , but that isn ’ t stopping these RINOs from opening up the flood gates anyway .
Big League Politics reported on how weak-kneed Republicans are rolling over and letting these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dollars into their states : President Trump set the record straight on the issue of refugee resettlement back in October .
“ As you know , for many years , leaders in Washington brought large numbers of refugees to your state from Somalia without considering the impact on schools and communities and taxpayers , ” Trump said during a rally in Minneapolis on October 10 .
“ You should be able to decide what is best for your own cities and for your own neighborhoods , and that ’ s what you have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and believe me , no other president would be doing that.
” Trump stayed true to his word and allowed states and counties to reject refugee resettlement .
However , Republican governors are a different story .
Republican governors have sent letters to the State Department announcing their desire to resettle refugees in their respective states… The following 15 GOP governors have hopped on board the mass migration bandwagon : President Trump has forced the hands of RINOs throughout the country , and the results have not been pretty .
Only Texas Governor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and rejected refugee resettlement in the lone star state , with several more governors still waiting to make their final decision .

Machete-Wielding Iranian Arrested Near Mar-a-Lago Initially Came to America as a Refugee
An Iranian national who was found with a machete, knives, an ax, and roughly $22,000 in cash in a gazebo outside of President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida has been revealed as an individual who initially arrived in the U.S. as a refugee.
Masoud Yarieilzoleh, 38, was arrested on Jan. 10 by the Palm Beach Police Department, according to reporting from the Palm Beach Post. Police searched Yarieilzoleh, found the weapons, arrested him, and charged him with carrying a concealed weapon. He has since been set free and now roams the streets pending a court appearance next month.
Law enforcement sources have confirmed to Breitbart News that Yarieilzoleh came to the U.S. as a refugee in 2014. He received a green card from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) two years later, and this machete wielder then obtained permanent lawful residence in the U.S. from that point onward.
Former President Barack Hussein Obama allowed the resettlement of over 25,000 refugees from Iran into the U.S. even though the Islamic Republic has been listed as a sponsor of terrorism by the State Department since 1984. The refugee resettlement program is notoriously corrupt and determined largely by bribes rather than legitimate humanitarian considerations.
Nevertheless, governors in red states throughout the country are opening the doors for refugees. Participation in the refugee resettlement program is now voluntary following the enactment of executive order 13888 issued by President Trump, but that isn’t stopping these RINOs from opening up the flood gates anyway.
Big League Politics reported on how weak-kneed Republicans are rolling over and letting these potentially dangerous foreigners be resettled with taxpayer dollars into their states:
President Trump set the record straight on the issue of refugee resettlement back in October. “As you know, for many years, leaders in Washington brought large numbers of refugees to your state from Somalia without considering the impact on schools and communities and taxpayers,” Trump said during a rally in Minneapolis on October 10. “You should be able to decide what is best for your own cities and for your own neighborhoods, and that’s what you have the right to do right now, and believe me, no other president would be doing that.” Trump stayed true to his word and allowed states and counties to reject refugee resettlement. However, Republican governors are a different story. Republican governors have sent letters to the State Department announcing their desire to resettle refugees in their respective states… The following 15 GOP governors have hopped on board the mass migration bandwagon: Kim Reynolds of Iowa
Doug Ducey of Arizona
Kevin Stitt of Oklahoma
Bill Lee of Tennessee
Doug Burgum of North Dakota
Kristi Noem of South Dakota
Chris Sununu of New Hampshire
Gary Herbert of Utah
Pete Ricketts of Nebraska
Jim Justice of West Virginia
Eric Holcomb of Indiana
Phil Scott of Vermont
Charlie Baker of Massachusetts
Mike DeWine of Ohio
Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas
President Trump has forced the hands of RINOs throughout the country, and the results have not been pretty. Only Texas Governor Greg Abbott has done the right thing and rejected refugee resettlement in the lone star state, with several more governors still waiting to make their final decision.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-16--Marsha Blackburn Demands Democrat Presidential Contenders Recuse Themselves from Sham Impeachment Tr

On Wednesday , Sen. Marsha Blackburn ( R-Tenn. ) announced that Democrat Senators currently running for the presidency should recuse themselves from a Senate trial .
Chad Pergram , who covers Congress for Fox News , broke the news on Twitter .
He tweeted , “ GOP TN Sen Blackburn wants Dem presidential candidates to recuse themselves in a Senate trial : Bennet , Klobuchar , Sanders , and Warren , can not sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace .
To participate..would be a failure of the oath they took to be ( impartial ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continues below Blackburn said in a statement , “ Tomorrow , one hundred United States Senators will be sworn in to serve in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump .
Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office , ” She suggested that Sens .
Bernie Sanders ( I-Vt. ) , Amy Klobuchar ( D-Minn. ) , Michael Bennet ( D-Colo. ) and Elizabeth Warren ( D-Mass . )
“ can not sit in judgment of the very President they seek @ @ @ @ @ @ @ articles to the Senate earlier today .
Got a hot news tip for us ?
Photos or video of a breaking story ?
Send your tips , photos and videos to tips @ bigleaguepolitics.com .
All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff .
Have something to say ?
Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions @ bigleaguepolitics.com .

Marsha Blackburn Demands Democrat Presidential Contenders Recuse Themselves from Sham Impeachment Trial
On Wednesday, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) announced that Democrat Senators currently running for the presidency should recuse themselves from a Senate trial.
Chad Pergram, who covers Congress for Fox News, broke the news on Twitter.
He tweeted, “GOP TN Sen Blackburn wants Dem presidential candidates to recuse themselves in a Senate trial: Bennet, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren, cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace. To participate..would be a failure of the oath they took to be (impartial).”
GOP TN Sen Blackburn wants Dem presidential candidates to recuse themselves in a Senate trial: Bennet, Klobuchar, Sanders, and Warren, cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace. To participate..would be a failure of the oath they took to be (impartial) — Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) January 15, 2020
Blackburn said in a statement, “Tomorrow, one hundred United States Senators will be sworn in to serve in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. Four of those Senators must recuse themselves for their unparalleled political interest in seeing this President removed from office,”
She suggested that Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) “cannot sit in judgment of the very President they seek to replace.”
The House delivered impeachment articles to the Senate earlier today.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--SANITY: Trump Judicial Appointee Refuses to Use Transgender Child Predator’s Preferred Pronouns in C

Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan , who was appointed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Donald Trump , struck back against transgender insanity on Wednesday in a court case .
Norman Varner , a man who pleaded guilty to child porn charges in 2012 , has since come out as transgender .
He now demands special rights due to his gender transition , which he announced in 2015 .
He demanded that the court use female pronouns to address him , and call him by his preferred name of “ Katherine Nicole Jett.
” Duncan was having none @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the case .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ with Deceased Pedo ’ s Right-Hand Woman “ Norman Varner , federal prisoner # 18479-078 , appeals the denial of his motion to change the name on his judgment of confinement to “ Katherine Nicole Jett.
” The district court denied the motion as meritless .
We conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion and so vacate the court ’ s judgment .
In conjunction with his appeal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with female pronouns .
We will deny that motion , ” Judge Duncan wrote .
take our poll - story continues below He added that “ no authority supports the proposition that we may require litigants , judges , court personnel , or anyone else to refer to gender-dyshoric litigants with pronouns matching their subjective gender identity.
” “ We decline to enlist the federal judiciary in this quixotic undertaking , ” Judge Duncan concluded .
In a dissent to the majority opinion on the case , Judge James Dennis – a liberal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed that Judge Duncan ’ s “ advisory opinion is inappropriate , unnecessary , and beyond the purview of federal courts.
” Liberals are complaining about the supposed callousness of Judge Duncan ’ s opinion on social media as well , believing that the convicted child molester ’ s delusions should be coddled by the judiciary : However , Judge Duncan ’ s points are relevant in an age where transgender insanity is enabling predators throughout the country .
Transgender criminals are claiming that they should be placed in confinement with the opposite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alleged transitions .
The LGBT movement is now suing to effectively end gender-based incarceration , and open pandora ’ s box for predators : The Transgender Law Center and law firm King & Greisen filed the suit in late November on behalf of approximately 170 transgender women , alleging systemic abuse inside Colorado ’ s male prisons in violation of the state ’ s anti-discrimination act .
The suit also claims that the Colorado Department of Corrections , known as CDOC , has discriminated against transgender women solely on the basis of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forward to serve as “ class representatives ” in the case .
Their names are Kandice Raven , Jane Gallentine , Taliyah Murphy , Amber Miller , Megan Gulley , Lavinya Karpierz and Cupcake Rivers .
Each of these women has gender dysphoria , a clinical condition that the American Psychiatric Association defines as the significant distress that accompanies the incongruence between a transgender person ’ s gender identity and their assigned sex .
The APA does not consider being transgender as a disability ; however , this distress is considered a disability @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have gone as far as attempting suicide or self-castration as means to deal with their severe gender dysphoria .
This is why the lawsuit also calls for appropriate medical and mental health care for transgender women behind bars .
The Trump administration ’ s remaking of the judiciary is already paying dividends , as Judge Duncan refuses to bow to the transgender agenda in the 5th District courts .

SANITY: Trump Judicial Appointee Refuses to Use Transgender Child Predator’s Preferred Pronouns in Court
Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, who was appointed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Donald Trump, struck back against transgender insanity on Wednesday in a court case.
Norman Varner, a man who pleaded guilty to child porn charges in 2012, has since come out as transgender. He now demands special rights due to his gender transition, which he announced in 2015. He demanded that the court use female pronouns to address him, and call him by his preferred name of “Katherine Nicole Jett.”
Duncan was having none of it while writing his majority opinion about the case.
“Norman Varner, federal prisoner # 18479-078, appeals the denial of his motion to change the name on his judgment of confinement to “Katherine Nicole Jett.” The district court denied the motion as meritless. We conclude that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion and so vacate the court’s judgment. In conjunction with his appeal, Varner also moves that he be addressed with female pronouns. We will deny that motion,” Judge Duncan wrote.
He added that “no authority supports the proposition that we may require litigants, judges, court personnel, or anyone else to refer to gender-dyshoric litigants with pronouns matching their subjective gender identity.”
“We decline to enlist the federal judiciary in this quixotic undertaking,” Judge Duncan concluded.
In a dissent to the majority opinion on the case, Judge James Dennis – a liberal appointee of former President Bill Clinton – claimed that Judge Duncan’s “advisory opinion is inappropriate, unnecessary, and beyond the purview of federal courts.”
Liberals are complaining about the supposed callousness of Judge Duncan’s opinion on social media as well, believing that the convicted child molester’s delusions should be coddled by the judiciary:
Judge Duncan is, but of course, a Trump appointee, and one of the lead attorneys on the Hobby Lobby case a few years back. https://t.co/vPdZih561M — Kid Cincinnati (@babystew) January 15, 2020
The plaintiff is transgender, and she simply asked to be addressed with female pronouns. Duncan—a Trump appointee—rejected that request, in a nasty screed that cruelly mocks and delegitimizes transgender identity. Get ready for another 40 years of this, folks. https://t.co/KyMaYIbkjZ — Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) January 15, 2020
However, Judge Duncan’s points are relevant in an age where transgender insanity is enabling predators throughout the country. Transgender criminals are claiming that they should be placed in confinement with the opposite gender because they have supposedly undergone their alleged transitions.
The LGBT movement is now suing to effectively end gender-based incarceration, and open pandora’s box for predators:
The Transgender Law Center and law firm King & Greisen filed the suit in late November on behalf of approximately 170 transgender women, alleging systemic abuse inside Colorado’s male prisons in violation of the state’s anti-discrimination act. The suit also claims that the Colorado Department of Corrections, known as CDOC, has discriminated against transgender women solely on the basis of their gender identity. Seven trans women came forward to serve as “class representatives” in the case. Their names are Kandice Raven, Jane Gallentine, Taliyah Murphy, Amber Miller, Megan Gulley, Lavinya Karpierz and Cupcake Rivers. Each of these women has gender dysphoria, a clinical condition that the American Psychiatric Association defines as the significant distress that accompanies the incongruence between a transgender person’s gender identity and their assigned sex. The APA does not consider being transgender as a disability; however, this distress is considered a disability. While incarcerated, some trans women have gone as far as attempting suicide or self-castration as means to deal with their severe gender dysphoria. This is why the lawsuit also calls for appropriate medical and mental health care for transgender women behind bars.
The Trump administration’s remaking of the judiciary is already paying dividends, as Judge Duncan refuses to bow to the transgender agenda in the 5th District courts.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--Game-Changer: West Virginia Invites Virginia’s Second Sanctuary Counties to Secede and Join the Pro-

West Virginia lawmakers are pushing a resolution inviting Virginia ’ s Second Amendment Sanctuary counties to become constituents of West Virginia .
AWR Hawkins reported that West Virginia lawmakers introduced a resolution , HCR8 , which is inviting Virginia ’ s Second Amendment Sanctuary counties to join the state of West Virginia .
This resolution alludes to 1863 , the very year Republicans broke off from slave-owning Virginia and formed West Virginia .
At the time , the people of Western Virginia did not believe “ the government at Richmond ” represented their interests .
Now , another divide is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gun rights issues .
So far , 118 local governments in Virginia have declared themselves Second Amendment sanctuaries .
West Virginia Delegates are using the resolution to declare that gun rights are on the chopping block in Virginia and that counties who choose to become a part of West Virginia will have their Second Amendment rights protected .
Whereas , Article VI , Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into , and become part of this state , with the consent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the qualified voters of the state ; and Whereas , In a spirit of conciliation , the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so , to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond ; and , we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia , under the conditions set forth in our state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition ; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed , and , we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitution .
Several Delegates such as “ Howell , Summers , Shott , Householder , C. Martin , Hott , Graves , Cadle , Barnhart , J. Jeffries , Maynard , Phillips , Foster , Hamrick , Steele , D. Jeffries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Paynter and Linville ” are sponsors of this legislation .
This resolution demands that a Special Session of state legislators plan “ a special election to provide for the approval of the admission , or , the rejection of such admission , of such county or independent city.
” The Associated Press reported that Virginia Democrat Governor Ralph Northam will announce a gun ban on January 15 , 2020 , when a peaceful pro-gun rally is set to take place .

Game-Changer: West Virginia Invites Virginia’s Second Sanctuary Counties to Secede and Join the Pro-Gun State
West Virginia lawmakers are pushing a resolution inviting Virginia’s Second Amendment Sanctuary counties to become constituents of West Virginia.
AWR Hawkins reported that West Virginia lawmakers introduced a resolution, HCR8, which is inviting Virginia’s Second Amendment Sanctuary counties to join the state of West Virginia.
This resolution alludes to 1863, the very year Republicans broke off from slave-owning Virginia and formed West Virginia.
At the time, the people of Western Virginia did not believe “the government at Richmond” represented their interests.
Now, another divide is emerging. But this time its concerns gun rights issues.
So far, 118 local governments in Virginia have declared themselves Second Amendment sanctuaries.
West Virginia Delegates are using the resolution to declare that gun rights are on the chopping block in Virginia and that counties who choose to become a part of West Virginia will have their Second Amendment rights protected.
HCR 8 stated:
Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitution.
Several Delegates such as “Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter and Linville” are sponsors of this legislation.
This resolution demands that a Special Session of state legislators plan “a special election to provide for the approval of the admission, or, the rejection of such admission, of such county or independent city.”
The Associated Press reported that Virginia Democrat Governor Ralph Northam will announce a gun ban on January 15, 2020, when a peaceful pro-gun rally is set to take place.
Tensions are heating up in Virginia as many Second Amendment supporters believe their right to keep and bear arms in under grave danger thanks to Democratic majority in the Virginia General Assembly.
Many fear that the weapons and firearms accessories that law-abiding gun owners have traditionally owned could be threatened by new legislation which undermines this otherwise lawful ownership of firearms.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--VIDEO: Former National Security Adviser John Bolton Caught on Film in Qatar

Former White House national security adviser John Bolton was recently spotted wandering the streets of Qatar for reasons unknown , sparking questions about why the mustachioed neocon war hawk was in the Middle East .
A video of Bolton reportedly walking on a sidewalk in Doha , Qatar was posted to Twitter on Wednesday .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ with Deceased Pedo ’ s Right-Hand Woman take our poll - story continues below It is unknown whether Bolton is in Qatar to cash in on a lobbyist job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are known to do , or to do something more sinister .
One Twitter user identified the location of the video : Bolton recently stated that he would testify in a Senate trial regarding President Donald Trump following his impeachment by Congress , even if it is against the wishes of the administration .
“ The House has concluded its Constitutional responsibility by adopting Articles of Impeachment related to the Ukraine matter .
It now falls to the Senate to fulfill its Constitutional obligation to try impeachments , and it does not appear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the still-unanswered Constitutional questions can be obtained before the Senate acts , ” Bolton wrote .
“ Accordingly , since my testimony is once again at issue , I have had to resolve the serious competing issues as best I could , based on careful consideration and study .
I have concluded that , if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony , I am prepared to testify , ” he added .
Since Bolton left the White House , President Trump has talked candidly about his incompetence as national security adviser @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the two men .
“ So , John is somebody that I actually got along with very well .
He made some very big mistakes , ” Trump said a day following his ouster of Bolton from the White House .
“ And it set us back , and frankly he wanted to do things — not necessarily tougher than me — You know John ’ s known as a tough guy .
He ’ s so tough he got us into Iraq … but he ’ s actually somebody I had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wasn ’ t getting along with people in the administration that I consider very important , ” he added .
Bolton has threatened the White House publicly , inferring that he may go rogue against his former boss .
Bolton also reportedly opposed President Trump ’ s diplomatic efforts with Ukraine .
He was a vocal opponent of Trump ’ s talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky , which were used to promulgate the second phase of the impeachment witch hunt against the President .
Bolton ’ s lawyer Charles Cooper told the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heat of their impeachment inquiry that his client “ was personally involved in many of the events , meetings , and conversations about which you have already received testimony , as well as many relevant meetings and conversations that have not yet been discussed in the testimonies thus far.
” It may not be a coincidence that Ukraine-gate kicked off right after Bolton left the administration under less-than-ideal terms .
Bolton ’ s shady appearance in Qatar only adds to the intrigue regarding his behavior as he readies himself to testify against the @ @ @ @ @

VIDEO: Former National Security Adviser John Bolton Caught on Film in Qatar
Former White House national security adviser John Bolton was recently spotted wandering the streets of Qatar for reasons unknown, sparking questions about why the mustachioed neocon war hawk was in the Middle East.
A video of Bolton reportedly walking on a sidewalk in Doha, Qatar was posted to Twitter on Wednesday.
WHAT THE FUCK https://t.co/B5iuGQEY86 — David Reaboi (@davereaboi) January 15, 2020
It is unknown whether Bolton is in Qatar to cash in on a lobbyist job, as so many former government officials are known to do, or to do something more sinister.
One Twitter user identified the location of the video:
https://twitter.com/evanchill/status/1217491226594856961
Bolton recently stated that he would testify in a Senate trial regarding President Donald Trump following his impeachment by Congress, even if it is against the wishes of the administration.
“The House has concluded its Constitutional responsibility by adopting Articles of Impeachment related to the Ukraine matter. It now falls to the Senate to fulfill its Constitutional obligation to try impeachments, and it does not appear possible that a final judicial resolution of the still-unanswered Constitutional questions can be obtained before the Senate acts,” Bolton wrote.
“Accordingly, since my testimony is once again at issue, I have had to resolve the serious competing issues as best I could, based on careful consideration and study. I have concluded that, if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify,” he added.
Since Bolton left the White House, President Trump has talked candidly about his incompetence as national security adviser and the many differences of opinion between the two men.
“So, John is somebody that I actually got along with very well. He made some very big mistakes,” Trump said a day following his ouster of Bolton from the White House.
“And it set us back, and frankly he wanted to do things — not necessarily tougher than me — You know John’s known as a tough guy. He’s so tough he got us into Iraq … but he’s actually somebody I had a very good relationship with. But he wasn’t getting along with people in the administration that I consider very important,” he added.
Bolton has threatened the White House publicly, inferring that he may go rogue against his former boss.
Re: speaking up — since resigning as National Security Advisor, the @WhiteHouse refused to return access to my personal Twitter account. Out of fear of what I may say? To those who speculated I went into hiding, I’m sorry to disappoint! — John Bolton (@AmbJohnBolton) November 22, 2019
Bolton also reportedly opposed President Trump’s diplomatic efforts with Ukraine. He was a vocal opponent of Trump’s talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which were used to promulgate the second phase of the impeachment witch hunt against the President.
Bolton’s lawyer Charles Cooper told the House of Representatives last year during the heat of their impeachment inquiry that his client “was personally involved in many of the events, meetings, and conversations about which you have already received testimony, as well as many relevant meetings and conversations that have not yet been discussed in the testimonies thus far.”
It may not be a coincidence that Ukraine-gate kicked off right after Bolton left the administration under less-than-ideal terms. Bolton’s shady appearance in Qatar only adds to the intrigue regarding his behavior as he readies himself to testify against the President to the Senate.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--Virginia Declares State of Emergency After Peaceful Second Amendment Activists Want to Hold Educatio

Virginia Governor Ralph “ Blackface ” Northam has called a state of emergency after allegedly receiving “ credible intelligence ” of threats of violence at an upcoming gun rights rally in Richmond , Virginia .
According to Vice , this state of emergency will temporarily ban individuals from carrying firearms on Capitol grounds .
At a press conference on Wednesday , January 15 , 2020 , Northam said that authorities believe “ armed militia groups plan to storm the Capitol ” during the rally on January 20 .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Right-Hand Woman In response to what he described as “ credible intelligence ” of threats of violence at an upcoming gun rights rally in Richmond , Virginia , Gov .
Ralph Northam has declared a state of emergency and will temporarily ban individuals from carrying firearms on Capitol grounds .
take our poll - story continues below Northam also claims that law enforcement had intercepted threats and “ extremist rhetoric ” similar to what was observed before the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville on August 2017 .
“ We will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happen here , ” he stated .
“ No weapons will be allowed on Capitol grounds , ” said Northam .
“ Everything from sticks and bats to chains and projectiles… .
The list also includes firearms .
It makes no sense to ban every other weapon but allow firearms when intelligence shows that armed militia groups plan to storm the Capitol.
” On the rally ’ s Facebook page , several attendees already said they won ’ t comply and plan on leaving their weapons at home .
Nevertheless , Richmond Mayor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on rule-breakers .
“ Violations of the law will not be tolerated , ” Stoney stated .
The event on January 20 , better known as “ Lobby Day ” , was put on by the Virginia Citizens Defense League , a pro-Second Amendment nonprofit as a response to the flood of new gun control legislation that Democrats in the Virginia State Legislature are proposing .
Northam admitted that the organizers have been planning the rally for some time .
“ I believe them when they say this is a peaceful event — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” stated Northam .
“ Unfortunately , they have unleashed something much larger , something they may not be able to control.
” According to the Facebook page , 5,000 people have plans of attending .
Event organizers warned the state that as many as 100,000 people could show up .
A website promoting the rally shows that at least 60 buses are scheduled to transport attendees to the state capitol of Richmond on Monday .
Carpools are also being organized for the event .
Northam also plans on establishing a unified command @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Richmond police department , and first responder teams .
Northam claims that the state of emergency will be lifted on Tuesday .
Ultimately , this decision by Northam is an overreaction .
There have been plenty of open carry demonstrations of people peacefully carrying normal firearms across the nation , without any incidents of violence .
Lobby Day in Richmond ultimately functions as an educational event for countless law-abiding gun owners who are worried of the new Democrat majority ’ s threats of passing unconstitutional gun control legislation .
But for paranoid politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the right wing constitutes a potential act of extremism .

Virginia Declares State of Emergency After Peaceful Second Amendment Activists Want to Hold Educational Event at Capitol
Virginia Governor Ralph “Blackface” Northam has called a state of emergency after allegedly receiving “credible intelligence” of threats of violence at an upcoming gun rights rally in Richmond, Virginia.
According to Vice, this state of emergency will temporarily ban individuals from carrying firearms on Capitol grounds.
At a press conference on Wednesday, January 15, 2020, Northam said that authorities believe “armed militia groups plan to storm the Capitol” during the rally on January 20.
In response to what he described as “credible intelligence” of threats of violence at an upcoming gun rights rally in Richmond, Virginia, Gov. Ralph Northam has declared a state of emergency and will temporarily ban individuals from carrying firearms on Capitol grounds.
Northam also claims that law enforcement had intercepted threats and “extremist rhetoric” similar to what was observed before the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville on August 2017. “We will not allow that mayhem and violence to happen here,” he stated.
“No weapons will be allowed on Capitol grounds,” said Northam. “Everything from sticks and bats to chains and projectiles…. The list also includes firearms. It makes no sense to ban every other weapon but allow firearms when intelligence shows that armed militia groups plan to storm the Capitol.”
On the rally’s Facebook page, several attendees already said they won’t comply and plan on leaving their weapons at home. Nevertheless, Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney has planned to crack down on rule-breakers. “Violations of the law will not be tolerated,” Stoney stated.
The event on January 20, better known as “Lobby Day”, was put on by the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a pro-Second Amendment nonprofit as a response to the flood of new gun control legislation that Democrats in the Virginia State Legislature are proposing. Northam admitted that the organizers have been planning the rally for some time.
“I believe them when they say this is a peaceful event — that’s what democracy is,” stated Northam. “Unfortunately, they have unleashed something much larger, something they may not be able to control.”
According to the Facebook page, 5,000 people have plans of attending. Event organizers warned the state that as many as 100,000 people could show up.
A website promoting the rally shows that at least 60 buses are scheduled to transport attendees to the state capitol of Richmond on Monday. Carpools are also being organized for the event.
Northam also plans on establishing a unified command between state police, Capitol police, Richmond police department, and first responder teams.
Northam claims that the state of emergency will be lifted on Tuesday.
Ultimately, this decision by Northam is an overreaction. There have been plenty of open carry demonstrations of people peacefully carrying normal firearms across the nation, without any incidents of violence.
Lobby Day in Richmond ultimately functions as an educational event for countless law-abiding gun owners who are worried of the new Democrat majority’s threats of passing unconstitutional gun control legislation.
But for paranoid politicians like Northam, any kind of dissent from the right wing constitutes a potential act of extremism.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--Mexican Cartels Rain Bullets Down on Police in Border Shootout

The officers were attacked on Monday , January 13 , 2019 early in the morning near the Libramiento 2 highway in the city ’ s southern section .
Breitbart Texas was able to gather information from authorities of the state of Tamaulipas .
The officers responded to a report of shootouts when Gulf Cartel assailants began opening fire .
The gunmen used dozens of makeshift road spikes which blew out the police vehicle ’ s tires .
One of the officers was shot in the leg while the other suffered undisclosed injuries .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Express ’ with Deceased Pedo ’ s Right-Hand Woman The assailants were able to escape using a series of dirt roads despite the manhunt used to pursue them .
The ambush on Tamaulipas state police comes during a time when the Mexican border cities of Reynosa and Rio Bravo are experiencing surges in violence as rival factions of the Gulf Cartel duke it out for control of drug and human smuggling routes in Texas .
take our poll - story continues below Last week , Rio Bravo , a border city situated right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prolonged shootout between the Gulf Cartel and the police .
The gunmen ended up stealing several vehicles to block roads .
Rio Bravo is currently under the control of a rival Gulf Cartel faction that uses the city as a springboard to send hitmen into Reynosa .
This is just another day in the failed state of Mexico .
Cartels practically have their way thanks to the weaponry they have acquired , which is not the conventional equipment most foreign onlookers think a criminal outfit would possess .
As a result , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military forces seemingly at will .
At this point , there is no question that Mexico ’ s dysfunction must be contained by putting up a barrier on the southern border .

Mexican Cartels Rain Bullets Down on Police in Border Shootout
The officers were attacked on Monday, January 13, 2019 early in the morning near the Libramiento 2 highway in the city’s southern section. Breitbart Texas was able to gather information from authorities of the state of Tamaulipas.
The officers responded to a report of shootouts when Gulf Cartel assailants began opening fire.
The gunmen used dozens of makeshift road spikes which blew out the police vehicle’s tires. One of the officers was shot in the leg while the other suffered undisclosed injuries.
The assailants were able to escape using a series of dirt roads despite the manhunt used to pursue them. The ambush on Tamaulipas state police comes during a time when the Mexican border cities of Reynosa and Rio Bravo are experiencing surges in violence as rival factions of the Gulf Cartel duke it out for control of drug and human smuggling routes in Texas.
Last week, Rio Bravo, a border city situated right below Donna, Texas, witnessed a prolonged shootout between the Gulf Cartel and the police. The gunmen ended up stealing several vehicles to block roads. Rio Bravo is currently under the control of a rival Gulf Cartel faction that uses the city as a springboard to send hitmen into Reynosa.
This is just another day in the failed state of Mexico. Cartels practically have their way thanks to the weaponry they have acquired, which is not the conventional equipment most foreign onlookers think a criminal outfit would possess.
As a result, they have been able to overpower police and military forces seemingly at will.
At this point, there is no question that Mexico’s dysfunction must be contained by putting up a barrier on the southern border.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--PANIC MODE: Iowa’s Bernie Team Locks Down Top Twitter Accounts Following James O’Keefe Exposé

One day after Project Veritas founder James O ’ Keefe exposed damning video of a Bernie Sanders organizer calling for violent revolution and re-education camps for Trump supporters , the campaign has locked down the Twitter accounts of their Iowa state directors to prevent more embarrassing disclosures from top supporters .
O ’ Keefe exposed that nine accounts have been locked in response to his hidden camera reporting , as Team Bernie scrambles to do damage control following the damaging revelations .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ with Deceased @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poll - story continues below The video released on Tuesday showed Kyle Jurek , a campaign organizer for the Sanders campaign in Iowa , explaining the devious and violent plans of the radical left if their socialist candidate fails to win the Democratic presidential nomination this year .
“ We ’ re going to make 1978 [ 1968 ] look like a f–ing Girl Scout f–ing cookout , ” said Jurek , referring to the clashes between police and protesters during the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago .
“ The cops are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting f–ing beaten in Milwaukee .
They ’ re going to call out the National Guard for that s–t .
I promise you that , ” he added .
If Trump wins re-election in November , Jurek confirmed that he and his fellow radicals intend to burn the entire country down in a showing of anti-capitalist fury .
“ F–ing cities burn , ” Jurek said when asked what would happen if Trump were to win , “ I mean , we don ’ t have a lot of time left , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ If Bernie doesn ’ t get the nomination , or it goes to the second round at the DNC convention , f–ing Milwaukee will burn , ” he said .
“ It ’ ll start in Milwaukee , and then when the police push back on that , other cities will just f–ing ( explosion sound ) .
” Yesterday ’ s video release can be seen in full here : O ’ Keefe demonstrated Federal Election Commission records indicating that Jurek has been a paid employee of the Sanders campaign for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 11,000 to be a revolutionary for Bernie .
He was also employed by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2018 , according to O ’ Keefe ’ s reporting .
In a follow-up video , O ’ Keefe showed that Jurek ’ s extremism is fostered and endorsed by the campaign .
He released footage of Holly Hallman , an Iowa Field Organizer for the Sanders campaign , praising Jurek as “ fabulous.
” “ If you can ’ t handle me at my most communist , you don ’ t deserve me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ joked while being recorded by Veritas .
“ There ’ s a lot of me ’ s in the Sanders campaign , ” he added .
This is part one of O ’ Keefe ’ s # Expose2020 campaign that intends to expose the extremist underbelly of the Sanders campaign .
The panicked response by the Iowa state leaders shows that O ’ Keefe ’ s work has already rocked the campaign to its very core .

PANIC MODE: Iowa’s Bernie Team Locks Down Top Twitter Accounts Following James O’Keefe Exposé
One day after Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe exposed damning video of a Bernie Sanders organizer calling for violent revolution and re-education camps for Trump supporters, the campaign has locked down the Twitter accounts of their Iowa state directors to prevent more embarrassing disclosures from top supporters.
O’Keefe exposed that nine accounts have been locked in response to his hidden camera reporting, as Team Bernie scrambles to do damage control following the damaging revelations.
The video released on Tuesday showed Kyle Jurek, a campaign organizer for the Sanders campaign in Iowa, explaining the devious and violent plans of the radical left if their socialist candidate fails to win the Democratic presidential nomination this year.
“We’re going to make 1978 [1968] look like a f–ing Girl Scout f–ing cookout,” said Jurek, referring to the clashes between police and protesters during the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
“The cops are going to be the ones that are getting f–ing beaten in Milwaukee. They’re going to call out the National Guard for that s–t. I promise you that,” he added.
If Trump wins re-election in November, Jurek confirmed that he and his fellow radicals intend to burn the entire country down in a showing of anti-capitalist fury.
“F–ing cities burn,” Jurek said when asked what would happen if Trump were to win, “I mean, we don’t have a lot of time left, we have to save f–ing human civilization.”
“If Bernie doesn’t get the nomination, or it goes to the second round at the DNC convention, f–ing Milwaukee will burn,” he said. “It’ll start in Milwaukee, and then when the police push back on that, other cities will just f–ing (explosion sound).”
Yesterday’s video release can be seen in full here:
O’Keefe demonstrated Federal Election Commission records indicating that Jurek has been a paid employee of the Sanders campaign for about six months, earning roughly $11,000 to be a revolutionary for Bernie. He was also employed by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2018, according to O’Keefe’s reporting.
In a follow-up video, O’Keefe showed that Jurek’s extremism is fostered and endorsed by the campaign. He released footage of Holly Hallman, an Iowa Field Organizer for the Sanders campaign, praising Jurek as “fabulous.”
BREAKING: Bernie Staffer Kyle Jurek “I’m an Anarcho-communist…I'm as far left as you can possibly get…There’s a lot of me’s in the @BernieSanders campaign…” "He's(Kyle Jurek) fabulous" – Holly Hallman, Bernie Iowa Field Organizer PART 2 12:00PM: https://t.co/BFGnoCwkvF pic.twitter.com/65xhItTprD — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 15, 2020
“If you can’t handle me at my most communist, you don’t deserve me at my most anarchist,” Jurek joked while being recorded by Veritas.
“There’s a lot of me’s in the Sanders campaign,” he added.
This is part one of O’Keefe’s #Expose2020 campaign that intends to expose the extremist underbelly of the Sanders campaign. The panicked response by the Iowa state leaders shows that O’Keefe’s work has already rocked the campaign to its very core.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--KRITARCHY: Federal Judge Halts Trump Administration From Allowing States to Deny Refugees

A federal judge has temporarily banned states from denying refugees , nullifying an executive order issued by the Trump administration last year making participation in the refugee resettlement program voluntary .
Judge Peter J. Messitte of the Maryland District Court , a judge appointed to the bench by former President Bill Clinton , made his decision at the behest of refugee trafficking groups that have filed lawsuits against the White House .
“ By giving States and Local Governments the power to veto where refugees may be resettled — in the face of clear statutory text and structure , purpose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ judicial holdings , and Constitutional doctrine to the contrary — Order 13888 does not appear to serve the overall public interest , ” Messitte wrote in his opinion .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ with Deceased Pedo ’ s Right-Hand Woman “ Granting the preliminary inductive relief Plaintiffs seek does , ” he added .
“ Refugee resettlement activity should go forward as it developed for the almost 40 years before Executive Order 13888 was announced.
” take our poll - story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society , Church World Service and the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service .
All three of these organizations are on the federal dole , receiving millions in taxpayer dollars to traffic potentially dangerous third-world refugees into the United States .
The federal judge has made a decision in effect to protect the gravy train for these groups from being cut off .
“ The President ’ s order and resulting agency actions threaten to deprive thousands of refugees of their best chance to successfully build a new life and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are waiting to reunite with their parents , children , and other relatives fleeing persecution , ” the organizations wrote in their complaint .
Creating the doctrine of forcible consent , Messitte wrote in his opinion that state and local jurisdictions have no power to resist refugee resettlement .
Messitte ’ s opinion is a startling rebuke of the system of constitutional federalism created by the Founding Fathers .
“ Lest there be any doubt , giving States and Local Governments the power to consent to the resettlement of refugees — which is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refugees will be received in their midst — flies in the face of clear Congressional intent , as expressed in the legislative history of the statute , ” he wrote .
Messitte is a classic example of a kritarch , a Greek term to describe a judge who abuses their power to lord over a society .
Author James Kirkpatrick has argued that judges need to be impeached or the rising kritarchy will mean the end to democracy and representative government : Currently , judges make law , journalists police the Narrative and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supposed “ authoritarians ” like Trump , go along with it .
Kritarchy may represent the real end stage of “ liberal democracy.
” To change this , we need to abandon the pretense that we are free and recognize that we are ruled by an elite hostile to our interests .
We need to delegitimize the institutions that keep us in this situation .
We need to strip away the aura of sanctity that surrounds these judges who are arbitrarily deciding our country ’ s most important policies .
Judges are politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Democrats want to impeach President Trump .
But instead , it ’ s about time Republicans at the federal and state levels start impeaching some judges .
If they don ’ t , then we should frankly admit the Constitution has failed—because one branch of government has achieved supremacy above all others .
In that case , I hope journalists can spare us the moralizing about “ liberal democracy.
” It ’ s long gone—if indeed it ever existed .
President Trump ’ s efforts to bust up the refugee resettlement scam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efforts of the kritarchy .

KRITARCHY: Federal Judge Halts Trump Administration From Allowing States to Deny Refugees
A federal judge has temporarily banned states from denying refugees, nullifying an executive order issued by the Trump administration last year making participation in the refugee resettlement program voluntary.
Judge Peter J. Messitte of the Maryland District Court, a judge appointed to the bench by former President Bill Clinton, made his decision at the behest of refugee trafficking groups that have filed lawsuits against the White House.
“By giving States and Local Governments the power to veto where refugees may be resettled — in the face of clear statutory text and structure, purpose, Congressional intent, executive practice, judicial holdings, and Constitutional doctrine to the contrary — Order 13888 does not appear to serve the overall public interest,” Messitte wrote in his opinion.
“Granting the preliminary inductive relief Plaintiffs seek does,” he added. “Refugee resettlement activity should go forward as it developed for the almost 40 years before Executive Order 13888 was announced.”
The lawsuit was initiated by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, Church World Service and the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service. All three of these organizations are on the federal dole, receiving millions in taxpayer dollars to traffic potentially dangerous third-world refugees into the United States. The federal judge has made a decision in effect to protect the gravy train for these groups from being cut off.
“The President’s order and resulting agency actions threaten to deprive thousands of refugees of their best chance to successfully build a new life and to burden thousands of U.S. families who are waiting to reunite with their parents, children, and other relatives fleeing persecution,” the organizations wrote in their complaint.
Creating the doctrine of forcible consent, Messitte wrote in his opinion that state and local jurisdictions have no power to resist refugee resettlement. Messitte’s opinion is a startling rebuke of the system of constitutional federalism created by the Founding Fathers.
“Lest there be any doubt, giving States and Local Governments the power to consent to the resettlement of refugees — which is to say veto power to determine whether refugees will be received in their midst — flies in the face of clear Congressional intent, as expressed in the legislative history of the statute,” he wrote.
Messitte is a classic example of a kritarch, a Greek term to describe a judge who abuses their power to lord over a society.
OUR WORLD: Iranian immigration judge denounces immigration website as "anti-Semitic" for using a Greek word to criticize her. Kritarchy (Noun) Rule by judges. Origin: [Gr. kree-tace’; judge + arch(ós); leader]https://t.co/39VXVClB1R — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) August 23, 2019
Author James Kirkpatrick has argued that judges need to be impeached or the rising kritarchy will mean the end to democracy and representative government:
Currently, judges make law, journalists police the Narrative and manufacture opinion, and politicians, even supposed “authoritarians” like Trump, go along with it. Kritarchy may represent the real end stage of “liberal democracy.” To change this, we need to abandon the pretense that we are free and recognize that we are ruled by an elite hostile to our interests. We need to delegitimize the institutions that keep us in this situation. We need to strip away the aura of sanctity that surrounds these judges who are arbitrarily deciding our country’s most important policies. Judges are politicians, just like journalists are activists. The Democrats want to impeach President Trump. But instead, it’s about time Republicans at the federal and state levels start impeaching some judges. If they don’t, then we should frankly admit the Constitution has failed—because one branch of government has achieved supremacy above all others. In that case, I hope journalists can spare us the moralizing about “liberal democracy.” It’s long gone—if indeed it ever existed.
President Trump’s efforts to bust up the refugee resettlement scam may ultimately be futile because of the efforts of the kritarchy.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--New York City Man Set Free by Liberal Judge After Punching a Cop in the Face Skips His Court Date

A New York City man who was set free by a left-wing judge after being caught on video punching a cop in the face skipped his court date on Monday , demonstrating the perils of liberal criminal justice policies .
Steven Haynes , the 40-year-old suspect , was set free last week without bail and allowed to walk the streets after admitting to hitting a police officer .
After he skipped his court appearance on Monday , he was arrested on a bench warrant shortly afterward .
The video of the attack shows a struggle between Haynes and a police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been reportedly drinking alcohol in public and hassling pedestrians while sitting on a sidewalk .
After the punch , the cop ’ s partner had to beat Haynes with a collapsible baton to subdue him .
It took several law enforcement officials to take him into custody .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ with Deceased Pedo ’ s Right-Hand Woman Haynes also faces charges of harassment , menacing , and resisting arrest in addition to his felony assault charge .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because of his inability or unwillingness to show up to his court appearance .
take our poll - story continues below Haynes is enabled by liberal public officials like New York state senator Julia Salazar of the Bronx , who are known to cheer when violent thugs are let loose on the streets to cause mayhem .
Liberal bail reform policies have empowered criminals and put law-abiding citizens at risk , as the case study of New Jersey has shown : On January 1 of this year , New Jersey overhauled its criminal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cash bail structure , replacing it with one that relies heavily on a mathematical risk assessment formula… From January 1 through March 31 , 10,193 eligible defendants were processed .
Preventive detention was ordered for only 12.4 % .
Nearly 85 % were given pretrial release , some with conditions… Outraged mother June Rodgers of Millville blames bail reform for the murder of her son .
He was shot to death on a street in Vineland in April after a verbal dispute with a man driving a car .
Cops arrested career criminal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ picked up on a separate gun charge four days before , and released with no bail… The state has created a Division of Pretrial Services to monitor defendants .
The funds come from court fees .
There have been 173 employees hired so far .
The projected spending for next fiscal year is expected to be in the range of $ 36 million to $ 38 million dollars .
The Office of Administrative Courts was unable to provide any statistics on the number of released defendants who have re-offended since January 1 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failed to appear for scheduled court dates .
New York City , with the rest of the state not far behind , is crumbling to pieces because of left-wing government officials with no respect for the rule of law .

New York City Man Set Free by Liberal Judge After Punching a Cop in the Face Skips His Court Date
A New York City man who was set free by a left-wing judge after being caught on video punching a cop in the face skipped his court date on Monday, demonstrating the perils of liberal criminal justice policies.
Steven Haynes, the 40-year-old suspect, was set free last week without bail and allowed to walk the streets after admitting to hitting a police officer. After he skipped his court appearance on Monday, he was arrested on a bench warrant shortly afterward.
The video of the attack shows a struggle between Haynes and a police officer on a Brooklyn street. Haynes had been reportedly drinking alcohol in public and hassling pedestrians while sitting on a sidewalk. After the punch, the cop’s partner had to beat Haynes with a collapsible baton to subdue him. It took several law enforcement officials to take him into custody.
Haynes also faces charges of harassment, menacing, and resisting arrest in addition to his felony assault charge. He may ultimately face more time in jail because of his inability or unwillingness to show up to his court appearance.
Haynes is enabled by liberal public officials like New York state senator Julia Salazar of the Bronx, who are known to cheer when violent thugs are let loose on the streets to cause mayhem.
Wealth-based detention doesn’t protect me or any other hypothetical victim of a crime. That is what this is about. Cash bail should be completely eliminated. If someone is charged with…attempting to spit in a cop’s mouth?…then let a jury decide what to do about it. https://t.co/CIPq12VfNS — Julia Salazar (@JuliaCarmel__) January 9, 2020
Liberal bail reform policies have empowered criminals and put law-abiding citizens at risk, as the case study of New Jersey has shown:
On January 1 of this year, New Jersey overhauled its criminal justice system and virtually eliminated the old cash bail structure, replacing it with one that relies heavily on a mathematical risk assessment formula… From January 1 through March 31, 10,193 eligible defendants were processed. Preventive detention was ordered for only 12.4%. Nearly 85% were given pretrial release, some with conditions… Outraged mother June Rodgers of Millville blames bail reform for the murder of her son. He was shot to death on a street in Vineland in April after a verbal dispute with a man driving a car. Cops arrested career criminal Jules Black, who’d been picked up on a separate gun charge four days before, and released with no bail… The state has created a Division of Pretrial Services to monitor defendants. The funds come from court fees. There have been 173 employees hired so far. The projected spending for next fiscal year is expected to be in the range of $36 million to $38 million dollars. The Office of Administrative Courts was unable to provide any statistics on the number of released defendants who have re-offended since January 1, or the number of those who have failed to appear for scheduled court dates.
New York City, with the rest of the state not far behind, is crumbling to pieces because of left-wing government officials with no respect for the rule of law.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--CORPORATE TYRANNY: Mailchimp Bans Molyneux After Complaint From Leftist Doxxing Activist

Mailchimp has banned libertarian pro-Trump philosopher Stefan Molyneux from using their email platform after a leftist activist issued a complaint on social media .
Nandini Jammi of Sleeping Giants , a left-wing collective that incites digital lynch mobs to destroy the lives of conservatives , made the complaint to Mailchimp in a Twitter post on Monday .
A day later , Mailchimp terminated the account at her behest .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ with Deceased Pedo ’ s Right-Hand Woman take our poll - story continues below Molyneux @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the dishonest claims made by Jammi regarding his views : Sleeping Giants are an organization on the forefront of a left-wing movement to foment commercial terrorism meant to create a digital gulag .
They mobilize jackals on social media to hurl threats and spread false information in order to destroy a political opponent ’ s life , with the intention of making it impossible for dissidents to make a living and feed their families .
Organizations like Sleeping Giants are private enforcers of the Orwellian nightmare , and have emerged as a far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Constitution than any government agency .
Free speech advocate Jim Watkins , who owned 8chan before it was blacklisted from the internet , described what happens when commercial terrorist organizations like Sleeping Giants collude with the elite media and Silicon Valley to metaphorically gangrape an individual ’ s core freedoms .
Watkins explained : “ I ’ ve received threats from big public companies .
It ’ s like commercial terrorism .
It ’ s like ‘ we ’ re going to not only shut you down , I ’ m going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two hops above you on the internet.
’ ” “ Proactively censoring is something they would do in Europe .
It ’ s something they would do in the People ’ s Republic of China , and that ’ s okay because that ’ s their country , but Americans don ’ t do that , ” Watkins said .
However , a culture against freedom of speech and expression has developed in the former land of the free because of commercial terrorist organizations like Sleeping Giants and their Big Tech enablers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ attempted to rectify the situation with legislation that would revoke special privileges for tech firms unless they can prove they are not exerting political bias .
“ There ’ s a growing list of evidence that shows big tech companies making editorial decisions to censor viewpoints they disagree with , ” Hawley said after he introduced legislation to amend enforcement of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act .
“ Even worse , the entire process is shrouded in secrecy because these companies refuse to make their protocols public .
This legislation simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to keep their government-granted immunity , they must bring transparency and accountability to their editorial processes and prove that they don ’ t discriminate , ” he added .
Until platform neutrality is established by law , the leftist war against the 1st Amendment will only intensify .

CORPORATE TYRANNY: Mailchimp Bans Molyneux After Complaint From Leftist Doxxing Activist
Mailchimp has banned libertarian pro-Trump philosopher Stefan Molyneux from using their email platform after a leftist activist issued a complaint on social media.
Nandini Jammi of Sleeping Giants, a left-wing collective that incites digital lynch mobs to destroy the lives of conservatives, made the complaint to Mailchimp in a Twitter post on Monday. A day later, Mailchimp terminated the account at her behest.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We’ve terminated this account. — Mailchimp (@Mailchimp) January 14, 2020
Molyneux fired back in a Twitter post against the dishonest claims made by Jammi regarding his views:
https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/1217168228117622785
Sleeping Giants are an organization on the forefront of a left-wing movement to foment commercial terrorism meant to create a digital gulag. They mobilize jackals on social media to hurl threats and spread false information in order to destroy a political opponent’s life, with the intention of making it impossible for dissidents to make a living and feed their families.
Organizations like Sleeping Giants are private enforcers of the Orwellian nightmare, and have emerged as a far bigger threat to the Bill of Rights and Constitution than any government agency.
Free speech advocate Jim Watkins, who owned 8chan before it was blacklisted from the internet, described what happens when commercial terrorist organizations like Sleeping Giants collude with the elite media and Silicon Valley to metaphorically gangrape an individual’s core freedoms.
Watkins explained: “I’ve received threats from big public companies. It’s like commercial terrorism. It’s like ‘we’re going to not only shut you down, I’m going to shut down the companies that are two hops above you on the internet.’”
“Proactively censoring is something they would do in Europe. It’s something they would do in the People’s Republic of China, and that’s okay because that’s their country, but Americans don’t do that,” Watkins said.
However, a culture against freedom of speech and expression has developed in the former land of the free because of commercial terrorist organizations like Sleeping Giants and their Big Tech enablers.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) has attempted to rectify the situation with legislation that would revoke special privileges for tech firms unless they can prove they are not exerting political bias.
“There’s a growing list of evidence that shows big tech companies making editorial decisions to censor viewpoints they disagree with,” Hawley said after he introduced legislation to amend enforcement of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
“Even worse, the entire process is shrouded in secrecy because these companies refuse to make their protocols public. This legislation simply states that if the tech giants want to keep their government-granted immunity, they must bring transparency and accountability to their editorial processes and prove that they don’t discriminate,” he added.
Until platform neutrality is established by law, the leftist war against the 1st Amendment will only intensify.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-01-15--INNOCENT: Michael Flynn Moves to Withdraw Guilty Plea, Citing ‘Bad Faith’ From Prosecutors

Former national security adviser Michael Flynn is moving to withdraw from his plea deal “ because of the government ’ s bad faith , vindictiveness and breach of the plea agreement.
” General Flynn had previously pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators in December 2017 regarding discussions he had with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during the presidential transition before Trump assumed the Oval Office .
The railroading of Gen. Flynn occurred during the time when the deep state was scrambling to concoct a trail indicating Russian collusion .
This led to FBI spook Robert Mueller ’ s embarrassing special @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Trump .
Trending : Bill Clinton Poses in Front of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ with Deceased Pedo ’ s Right-Hand Woman Gen. Flynn ’ s lawyers claim in a court filing that prosecutors attempted to coerce their client into providing “ false ” testimony .
They claim prosecutors wanted Flynn to say that he “ knew and intended ” to sign erroneous filings regarding his lobbying work in Turkey , and therefore break his plea agreement by not telling the truth .
take our poll - story continues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s legal team are correct , this is the latest instance of chicanery by a deep state apparatus desperate to crucify individuals close to President Trump .
“ The prosecution has shown abject bad faith in pure retaliation against Mr. Flynn since he retained new counsel , ” Flynn ’ s defense team wrote in the filing .
“ This can only be because with new , unconflicted counsel , Mr. Flynn refused to lie for the prosecution.
” Prosecutors recommended a harsher sentence to Gen. Flynn than they originally intended because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent weeks , including replacing his legal team .
They issued their recommendation that Gen. Flynn serve six months in prison last week .
“ The government has reason to believe , through representations by the defendant ’ s counsel , that the defendant has retreated from his acceptance of responsibility in this case regarding his lies to the FBI , ” prosecutors wrote .
Gen. Flynn ’ s legal team has also cited “ extraordinary developments ” that have come to light in the last 30 days , and they allege that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Gen. Flynn ’ s lawyers argue that they need more time to cover these developments .
Gen. Flynn ’ s railroading has been one of the most shameful aspects of the deep state ’ s witch hunt against President Trump .
Former FBI agent Peter Strzok , the disgraced philanderer , interviewed Gen. Flynn in early 2017 to allegedly set him up with dubious charges in a perjury trap .
Big League Politics has reported on the developments in the Flynn case for years : As President Donald Trump calls for an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on former Mueller team member Peter Strzok ’ s blatant unlawful attempts to personally target Trump , the case against General Michael Flynn is also becoming more precarious due to Strzok ’ s involvement .
In fact , Strzok personally set up General Flynn , the original Trump White House national security adviser .
On January 24 , 2017 , Peter Strzok interviewed General Michael Flynn inside the White House alongside another agent .
Flynn ’ s lawyer was not present .
Flynn apparently did not tell the White House about his meeting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the anti-Trump deputy attorney general whose underling told the FBI to shut down the Clinton Foundation case .
Yates informed the White House on January 26 that Flynn met with the FBI .
That was the beginning of the end for the original Trump White House .
Strzok was close personal friends with the foreign intelligence judge Rudolph Contreras who accepted General Flynn ’ s guilty plea .
Contreras recused himself after he already accepted Flynn ’ s guilty plea .
Strzok and Page detailed their plan to meet with Contreras in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ texts : PAGE : “ Rudy is on the [ Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ] !
Did you know that ?
Just appointed two months ago.
” STRZOK : “ I did .
I need to get together with him.
” PAGE : “ said he ’ d gotten on a month or two ago at a graduation party we were both at.
” Mueller reportedly coerced Flynn into pleading guilty by threatening the general ’ s son Mike Flynn Jr. , whom Hillary Clinton clearly referred to in a tweet expressing anger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Comet Pizza-Gate story .
Evidence now clearly shows that General Michael Flynn was targeted for prosecution under a charge of lying to federal investigators because Robert Mueller was trying to flip him into participating in the “ Russia ” probe against President Donald Trump .
Gen. Flynn may have his day in court yet to prove his innocence .
But as long-time Trump confidant Roger Stone found out , Washington D.C. swamp courts are not exactly known for their fairness and impartiality .
It will continue to be an uphill battle for Gen. @ @ @ @ @ @

INNOCENT: Michael Flynn Moves to Withdraw Guilty Plea, Citing ‘Bad Faith’ From Prosecutors
Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn speaks at the Defense Intelligence Agency change of directorship at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, July 24, 2012. Army Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess Jr. turned over directorship of DIA to LtGen Flynn after serving in the position since 2009. DoD photo by Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo (Released)
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn is moving to withdraw from his plea deal “because of the government’s bad faith, vindictiveness and breach of the plea agreement.”
General Flynn had previously pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators in December 2017 regarding discussions he had with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during the presidential transition before Trump assumed the Oval Office.
The railroading of Gen. Flynn occurred during the time when the deep state was scrambling to concoct a trail indicating Russian collusion. This led to FBI spook Robert Mueller’s embarrassing special counsel investigation that ultimately failed at ousting President Trump.
Gen. Flynn’s lawyers claim in a court filing that prosecutors attempted to coerce their client into providing “false” testimony. They claim prosecutors wanted Flynn to say that he “knew and intended” to sign erroneous filings regarding his lobbying work in Turkey, and therefore break his plea agreement by not telling the truth.
If the claims of Gen. Flynn’s legal team are correct, this is the latest instance of chicanery by a deep state apparatus desperate to crucify individuals close to President Trump.
“The prosecution has shown abject bad faith in pure retaliation against Mr. Flynn since he retained new counsel,” Flynn’s defense team wrote in the filing. “This can only be because with new, unconflicted counsel, Mr. Flynn refused to lie for the prosecution.”
Prosecutors recommended a harsher sentence to Gen. Flynn than they originally intended because of his perceived lack of cooperation in recent weeks, including replacing his legal team. They issued their recommendation that Gen. Flynn serve six months in prison last week.
“The government has reason to believe, through representations by the defendant’s counsel, that the defendant has retreated from his acceptance of responsibility in this case regarding his lies to the FBI,” prosecutors wrote.
Gen. Flynn’s legal team has also cited “extraordinary developments” that have come to light in the last 30 days, and they allege that these explosive revelations affect the case substantially. Gen. Flynn’s lawyers argue that they need more time to cover these developments.
Gen. Flynn’s railroading has been one of the most shameful aspects of the deep state’s witch hunt against President Trump. Former FBI agent Peter Strzok, the disgraced philanderer, interviewed Gen. Flynn in early 2017 to allegedly set him up with dubious charges in a perjury trap.
Big League Politics has reported on the developments in the Flynn case for years:
As President Donald Trump calls for an end to the Robert Mueller investigation based on former Mueller team member Peter Strzok’s blatant unlawful attempts to personally target Trump, the case against General Michael Flynn is also becoming more precarious due to Strzok’s involvement. In fact, Strzok personally set up General Flynn, the original Trump White House national security adviser. On January 24, 2017, Peter Strzok interviewed General Michael Flynn inside the White House alongside another agent. Flynn’s lawyer was not present. Flynn apparently did not tell the White House about his meeting. Guess who did? Sally Yates, the anti-Trump deputy attorney general whose underling told the FBI to shut down the Clinton Foundation case. Yates informed the White House on January 26 that Flynn met with the FBI. That was the beginning of the end for the original Trump White House. Strzok was close personal friends with the foreign intelligence judge Rudolph Contreras who accepted General Flynn’s guilty plea. Contreras recused himself after he already accepted Flynn’s guilty plea. Strzok and Page detailed their plan to meet with Contreras in a July 25, 2016 series of texts: PAGE: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that? Just appointed two months ago.”
STRZOK: “I did. I need to get together with him.”
PAGE: “said he’d gotten on a month or two ago at a graduation party we were both at.” Mueller reportedly coerced Flynn into pleading guilty by threatening the general’s son Mike Flynn Jr., whom Hillary Clinton clearly referred to in a tweet expressing anger at Flynn Jr. for tweeting about the Comet Pizza-Gate story. Evidence now clearly shows that General Michael Flynn was targeted for prosecution under a charge of lying to federal investigators because Robert Mueller was trying to flip him into participating in the “Russia” probe against President Donald Trump.
Gen. Flynn may have his day in court yet to prove his innocence. But as long-time Trump confidant Roger Stone found out, Washington D.C. swamp courts are not exactly known for their fairness and impartiality. It will continue to be an uphill battle for Gen. Flynn to clear his name.