bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-20--Former U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher CONFIRMS That He Floated Possible Presidential Pardon to Julian As

Yesterday , an attorney for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in court that his client was offered a presidential pardon in exchange for Russia testimony .
Former Congressman Dana Rohrabacher has now essentially confirmed those allegations .
“ I spoke to Julian Assange and told him if he would provide evidence about who gave WikiLeaks the emails , I would petition the president to give him a pardon , ” Rohrabacher said to Yahoo News .
“ He knew I could get to the president.
” Rohrabacher had a three-hour meeting with Assange in August 2017 while he was holed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Rohrabacher was hoping to gather proof that Seth Rich , a former DNC staffer murdered in 2016 who many now put on the Clinton kill count , or another individual leaked the information to WikiLeaks .
The deep state claims the Russians were behind it .
Trending : HMM : Actress Rosario Dawson Comes Out as Lesbian Just One Month After She ‘ Dated ’ Cory Booker He made it clear that he only requested “ truthful ” information from Assange , and in no way meant to coerce him to produce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former White House chief of staff John Kelly after the fact about the meeting , whom he said was “ courteous ” but ultimately brushed him off .
take our poll - story continues below White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham , who worked for the First Lady when this took place , is vehemently denying the allegations .
“ The President barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he ’ s an ex-congressman , ” she said in a statement .
“ He ’ s never spoken to him on this subject or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complete fabrication and a total lie .
This is probably another never ending hoax and total lie from the DNC.
” Right now , Assange is facing 18 felony charges , including 17 under the Espionage Act , for allegedly helping former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning hack information exposing deep state crimes and other illicit activities in 2010 .
“ Chelsea Manning ’ s plea and mitigation to the military commission has key passages which we will be relying on so we would seek to extract that and key press reports so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said Assange ’ s attorney Edward Fitzgerald , who is arguing that Britain should not extradite his client back to the United States , during a preliminary court appearance this week .
“ What we say is it is an abuse to seek extradition for a political offense so that is really part of the abuse argument , ” he added .
Assange has repeatedly said on the record that Russia did not give him the information that his organization leaked from the DNC .
“ Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications .
That ’ s false .
We can say that the Russian government is not the source , ” Assange said in Nov. 2016 in an interview with an Australian broadcaster .
“ Well , the reason is obvious .
They ’ re trying to delegitimize the Trump administration as it goes into the White House .
They are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate President , ” Assange told Sean Hannity during a Fox News interview , explaining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We can say , we have said , repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party , ” Assange told Hannity .
A pardon of Assange would be a devastating blow to the deep state , which has been battling to overthrow President Trump since his election .

Former U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher CONFIRMS That He Floated Possible Presidential Pardon to Julian Assange
Yesterday, an attorney for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in court that his client was offered a presidential pardon in exchange for Russia testimony. Former Congressman Dana Rohrabacher has now essentially confirmed those allegations.
“I spoke to Julian Assange and told him if he would provide evidence about who gave WikiLeaks the emails, I would petition the president to give him a pardon,” Rohrabacher said to Yahoo News. “He knew I could get to the president.”
Rohrabacher had a three-hour meeting with Assange in August 2017 while he was holed up at the Ecuadorian Embassy in Britain. Rohrabacher was hoping to gather proof that Seth Rich, a former DNC staffer murdered in 2016 who many now put on the Clinton kill count, or another individual leaked the information to WikiLeaks. The deep state claims the Russians were behind it.
He made it clear that he only requested “truthful” information from Assange, and in no way meant to coerce him to produce a “lie.” Rohrabacher talked to former White House chief of staff John Kelly after the fact about the meeting, whom he said was “courteous” but ultimately brushed him off.
White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham, who worked for the First Lady when this took place, is vehemently denying the allegations.
“The President barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he’s an ex-congressman,” she said in a statement. “He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject. It is a complete fabrication and a total lie. This is probably another never ending hoax and total lie from the DNC.”
Right now, Assange is facing 18 felony charges, including 17 under the Espionage Act, for allegedly helping former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning hack information exposing deep state crimes and other illicit activities in 2010.
“Chelsea Manning’s plea and mitigation to the military commission has key passages which we will be relying on so we would seek to extract that and key press reports so the court has key materials,” said Assange’s attorney Edward Fitzgerald, who is arguing that Britain should not extradite his client back to the United States, during a preliminary court appearance this week.
“What we say is it is an abuse to seek extradition for a political offense so that is really part of the abuse argument,” he added.
Assange has repeatedly said on the record that Russia did not give him the information that his organization leaked from the DNC.
“Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false. We can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange said in Nov. 2016 in an interview with an Australian broadcaster.
“Well, the reason is obvious. They’re trying to delegitimize the Trump administration as it goes into the White House. They are trying to say that President-elect Trump is not a legitimate President,” Assange told Sean Hannity during a Fox News interview, explaining the genesis of the Russia lie.
“We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party,” Assange told Hannity.
A pardon of Assange would be a devastating blow to the deep state, which has been battling to overthrow President Trump since his election.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-20--Trump White House Chief of Staff Claims America “Desperate” For More Immigration

President Trump ’ s White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney sharply departed from previous Trump administration policy on immigration when speaking at an event in England on Wednesday , according to new reporting from the Washington Post .
Mulvaney claimed that the United States is “ desperate ” for higher levels of legal immigration .
“ We are desperate — desperate — for more people .
We are running out of people to fuel the economic growth that we ’ ve had in our nation over the last four years .
We need more immigrants.
” Trending : HMM @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lesbian Just One Month After She ‘ Dated ’ Cory Booker Mulvaney framed his call for additional levels of legal immigration by merely stating the process had to be lawful .
It wasn ’ t a consideration that unauthorized immigration is already illegal for a reason- it drives down wages of American workers , raises costs of housing and utilities , and places burdens on communities unprepared for elevated levels of population growth .
take our poll - story continues below Unfortunately , Mulvaney ’ s perspective on immigration policy- one that prioritizes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American corporations- is widely held among the donor class elite of the Republican Party , who ignores concerns on the impact of such policy on American workers .
Charles Koch , a notable political enemy of President Trump , bankrolls influence efforts to massively increase annual legal immigration levels , putting himself on the same page as Mulvaney on the topic .
President Trump has given mixed messages on legal immigration policy , running on a strong pro-American worker restrictionist platform as a candidate and flirting with the idea of increased levels as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during his presidency , a development likely linked to the increase in wages among America ’ s blue collar workers .
Early Trump supporters such as Stephen K. Bannon and Stephen Miller have proved instrumental to blocking plans suggested by those such as Jared Kushner to buff immigration levels .
Unfortunately , it appears as if the Chamber of Commerce crowd has an ally in a high place within the White House , who seeks to deliver the cheap labor programs they need to avoid paying higher wages to American workers .
Mulvaney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Chamber of Commerce and Koch Brothers raises serious questions about his high-ranking place within the administration .

Trump White House Chief of Staff Claims America “Desperate” For More Immigration
WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 17: Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney answers questions during a briefing at the White House October 17, 2019 in Washington, DC. Mulvaney answered a range of questions relating to the issues surrounding the impeachment inquiry of U.S. President Donald Trump, and other issues during the briefing. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
President Trump’s White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney sharply departed from previous Trump administration policy on immigration when speaking at an event in England on Wednesday, according to new reporting from the Washington Post.
Mulvaney claimed that the United States is “desperate” for higher levels of legal immigration.
“We are desperate — desperate — for more people. We are running out of people to fuel the economic growth that we’ve had in our nation over the last four years. We need more immigrants.”
Mulvaney framed his call for additional levels of legal immigration by merely stating the process had to be lawful. It wasn’t a consideration that unauthorized immigration is already illegal for a reason- it drives down wages of American workers, raises costs of housing and utilities, and places burdens on communities unprepared for elevated levels of population growth.
Unfortunately, Mulvaney’s perspective on immigration policy- one that prioritizes a desire for more cheap labor for American corporations- is widely held among the donor class elite of the Republican Party, who ignores concerns on the impact of such policy on American workers. Charles Koch, a notable political enemy of President Trump, bankrolls influence efforts to massively increase annual legal immigration levels, putting himself on the same page as Mulvaney on the topic.
President Trump has given mixed messages on legal immigration policy, running on a strong pro-American worker restrictionist platform as a candidate and flirting with the idea of increased levels as President. Immigration levels broadly have decreased during his presidency, a development likely linked to the increase in wages among America’s blue collar workers.
Early Trump supporters such as Stephen K. Bannon and Stephen Miller have proved instrumental to blocking plans suggested by those such as Jared Kushner to buff immigration levels. Unfortunately, it appears as if the Chamber of Commerce crowd has an ally in a high place within the White House, who seeks to deliver the cheap labor programs they need to avoid paying higher wages to American workers.
Mulvaney’s desire to push the policies of the Chamber of Commerce and Koch Brothers raises serious questions about his high-ranking place within the administration.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-20--Bolton Confesses: Impeachment Testimony Would’ve Been Nothingburger

John Bolton admitted at an event at Vanderbilt University on Wednesday night that any testimony he would ’ ve given at Senate impeachment proceedings would ’ ve been inconsequential .
“ People can argue about what I should have said and what I should have done .
I will bet you a dollar right here and now my testimony would have made no difference to the ultimate outcome.
” Bolton ’ s remarks casts serious doubt on the potential of President Trump asking for the President of Ukraine , Volodymyr Zelensky , to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Actress Rosario Dawson Comes Out as Lesbian Just One Month After She ‘ Dated ’ Cory Booker Democrats , and some Republicans such as Mitt Romney , desired to hear Bolton testify at impeachment proceedings in order to properly gauge the context of President Trump ’ s controversial phone call in July 2019. take our poll - story continues below For Bolton to dismiss the impact of his own testimony ( that never ended up occurring ) demonstrates that he had no plans on delivering the long-sought smoking gun desired by Democrats to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fallen out with President Trump since being fired as National Security Adviser , made it clear that the sharply partisan manner in which House Democrats organized their impeachment effort dissuaded him from testifying in the House .
“ The process drove Republicans who might have voted for impeachment away from the president because it was so partisan.
” The longtime neoconservative bureaucrat went on to slam the House impeachment process as “ malpractice.
” Bolton is expected to spill the beans on what he would ’ ve discussed in a potential Senate impeachment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , subject to a national security review by the White House .

Bolton Confesses: Impeachment Testimony Would’ve Been Nothingburger
John Bolton admitted at an event at Vanderbilt University on Wednesday night that any testimony he would’ve given at Senate impeachment proceedings would’ve been inconsequential.
“People can argue about what I should have said and what I should have done. I will bet you a dollar right here and now my testimony would have made no difference to the ultimate outcome.”
Bolton’s remarks casts serious doubt on the potential of President Trump asking for the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, to investigate Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden with corrupt intent.
Democrats, and some Republicans such as Mitt Romney, desired to hear Bolton testify at impeachment proceedings in order to properly gauge the context of President Trump’s controversial phone call in July 2019.
For Bolton to dismiss the impact of his own testimony(that never ended up occurring) demonstrates that he had no plans on delivering the long-sought smoking gun desired by Democrats to push impeachment.
Bolton, who has fallen out with President Trump since being fired as National Security Adviser, made it clear that the sharply partisan manner in which House Democrats organized their impeachment effort dissuaded him from testifying in the House.
“The process drove Republicans who might have voted for impeachment away from the president because it was so partisan.”
The longtime neoconservative bureaucrat went on to slam the House impeachment process as “malpractice.”
Bolton is expected to spill the beans on what he would’ve discussed in a potential Senate impeachment testimony in a book currently awaiting publication, subject to a national security review by the White House.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-20--Britain Kicks the Bums Out by Unveiling New Skill-Based Immigration System

On Wednesday , February 19 , 2020 , the United Kingdom announced a new change in immigration policy that would bar unskilled immigrants from entering the country .
Under new requirements , migrants must be able to speak English and hold a job .
According to Home Secretary Priti Patel , the new policy will make it easier for “ the brightest and the best from around the world ” to enter the country , declaring it a “ historic moment for the whole country.
” Trending : HMM : Actress Rosario Dawson Comes Out as Lesbian Just One Month @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This plan will go into effect on January 1 , 2021 , which intends to reduce the UK ’ s reliance on low-skilled ” migrants and incentivize companies to develop technology and automation .
take our poll - story continues below It encourages firms to hire foreigners “ with greatest talents , ” such as “ scientists , engineers , academics and other highly-skilled workers , ” according to the government ’ s document marketing this policy .
“ We need to shift the focus of our economy away from a reliance on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on investment in technology and automation , ” the Home Office announced .
Patel claimed in a number of TV and radio interviews Wednesday that businesses need to concentrate on hiring “ economically inactive ” British-born adults between the ages of 16 and 64 , rather than importing immigrants .
According to a report from The Guardian , the Home secretary called on firms to focus their resources on British natives and “ up their skills and make their skills relevant.
” The immigration policy will revamp current rules and establish a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meet certain requirements which include employment and language proficiency before they can stay in the U.K for longer periods time , according to the government ’ s official policy paper .
Migrants must be able to speak English , while also proving they have a job offer from a known employer with a minimum 25,600 pound ( roughly $ 33,000 ) salary .
Before Brexit took place , European Union citizens were allowed to freely move between countries , but under the U.K. ’ s new policy , that freedom of movement would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Britain ’ s foreign workforce comes from Eastern Europe and they are generally involved in the food processing , hospitality , construction , kitchen work and elderly care sectors .
At least 3.2 million European Union residents already living in the U.K. would still be allowed to stay and work .
Johnson is expected to introduce this bill next month .

Britain Kicks the Bums Out by Unveiling New Skill-Based Immigration System
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020, the United Kingdom announced a new change in immigration policy that would bar unskilled immigrants from entering the country.
Under new requirements, migrants must be able to speak English and hold a job.
According to Home Secretary Priti Patel, the new policy will make it easier for “the brightest and the best from around the world” to enter the country, declaring it a “historic moment for the whole country.”
This plan will go into effect on January 1, 2021, which intends to reduce the UK’s reliance on low-skilled” migrants and incentivize companies to develop technology and automation.
It encourages firms to hire foreigners “with greatest talents,” such as “scientists, engineers, academics and other highly-skilled workers,” according to the government’s document marketing this policy.
“We need to shift the focus of our economy away from a reliance on cheap labor from Europe and instead concentrate on investment in technology and automation,” the Home Office announced.
Patel claimed in a number of TV and radio interviews Wednesday that businesses need to concentrate on hiring “economically inactive” British-born adults between the ages of 16 and 64, rather than importing immigrants.
According to a report from The Guardian, the Home secretary called on firms to focus their resources on British natives and “up their skills and make their skills relevant.”
The immigration policy will revamp current rules and establish a “points-based” system, where migrants must meet certain requirements which include employment and language proficiency before they can stay in the U.K for longer periods time, according to the government’s official policy paper.
Migrants must be able to speak English, while also proving they have a job offer from a known employer with a minimum 25,600 pound (roughly $33,000) salary.
Before Brexit took place, European Union citizens were allowed to freely move between countries, but under the U.K.’s new policy, that freedom of movement would be eliminated.
A substantial portion of Britain’s foreign workforce comes from Eastern Europe and they are generally involved in the food processing, hospitality, construction, kitchen work and elderly care sectors. At least 3.2 million European Union residents already living in the U.K. would still be allowed to stay and work.
Johnson is expected to introduce this bill next month.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-20--Wisconsin Polling Shows President Trump ROUNDLY Defeating Entire Democratic Field

New polling from Quinnipiac released Thursday shows President Donald Trump handily defeating every major Democratic presidential candidate in hypothetical general election matchups .
Trending : HMM : Actress Rosario Dawson Comes Out as Lesbian Just One Month After She ‘ Dated ’ Cory Booker Well-known Democrats Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are the most competitive candidates against Trump in the Wisconsin general election , and even they lose by a considerable seven points to the incumbent Republican president .
take our poll - story continues below Even Pete Buttigieg , an Indiana mayor who claims to have a credible path @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grabbed from the Democratic Party in 2016 , appears nowhere near seriously competing in the state .
The polling suggests Democrats will have a serious uphill battle in order to contend for the electoral votes of midwestern states such as Wisconsin , in 2020 or other future Presidential elections .
President Trump ’ s polling in statewide and national surveys has consistently improved as the Democratic Primary erupts in contention , suggesting that the divisions within the Democratic Party may bode well for his re-election .
The state was formerly assumed to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ won its electoral votes in a shocking upset in 2016 .
Pennsylvania and Michigan also went Republican for the first time in decades in Trump ’ s victory , and will prove essential to the election in 2020 .
Polling of the latter two states shows closer general election contests than in Wisconsin .
If Democrats are resigned to defeat in Midwestern states such as Wisconsin , they may choose to redouble their efforts in southwestern states such as Arizona or Texas .
Got a hot news tip for us ?
Photos or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your tips , photos and videos to tips @ bigleaguepolitics.com .
All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff .
Have something to say ?
Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions @ bigleaguepolitics.com .

Wisconsin Polling Shows President Trump ROUNDLY Defeating Entire Democratic Field
New polling from Quinnipiac released Thursday shows President Donald Trump handily defeating every major Democratic presidential candidate in hypothetical general election matchups.
WISCONSIN
Trump 50% (+11)
Klobuchar 39%
.
Trump 51% (+10)
Warren 41%
.
Trump 49% (+8)
Buttigieg 41%
.
Trump 49% (+8)
Bloomberg 41%
.
Trump 50% (+7)
Sanders 43%
.
Trump 49% (+7)
Biden 42%@QuinnipiacPoll 2/12-18https://t.co/YezsOptZpg — Political Polls (@Politics_Polls) February 20, 2020
Well-known Democrats Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are the most competitive candidates against Trump in the Wisconsin general election, and even they lose by a considerable seven points to the incumbent Republican president.
Even Pete Buttigieg, an Indiana mayor who claims to have a credible path to victory in midwestern states the President grabbed from the Democratic Party in 2016, appears nowhere near seriously competing in the state.
The polling suggests Democrats will have a serious uphill battle in order to contend for the electoral votes of midwestern states such as Wisconsin, in 2020 or other future Presidential elections.
President Trump’s polling in statewide and national surveys has consistently improved as the Democratic Primary erupts in contention, suggesting that the divisions within the Democratic Party may bode well for his re-election.
The state was formerly assumed to be a safe blue state, before Trump won its electoral votes in a shocking upset in 2016. Pennsylvania and Michigan also went Republican for the first time in decades in Trump’s victory, and will prove essential to the election in 2020. Polling of the latter two states shows closer general election contests than in Wisconsin.
If Democrats are resigned to defeat in Midwestern states such as Wisconsin, they may choose to redouble their efforts in southwestern states such as Arizona or Texas.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-20--RAILROADED: Roger Stone Sentenced to 40 Months in Prison with Status of Case Up in the Air

Political operative Roger Stone was sentenced to 40 months in prison by a federal judge today , even with the status of his case up in the air after severe improprieties were found in the proceedings .
US District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson made it clear that she meant to send a political statement with her strict sentencing of Stone .
“ This is intolerable to the administration of justice and the court should not sit idly by , shrug its shoulders and say well that is just Roger being Roger , ” said Jackson , who was appointed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hussein Obama , before issuing the sentence .
Trending : HMM : Actress Rosario Dawson Comes Out as Lesbian Just One Month After She ‘ Dated ’ Cory Booker “ The truth still exists .
The truth still matters .
Roger Stone ’ s insistence that it doesn ’ t … [ is ] a threat to our most fundamental institutions , ” she later added .
take our poll - story continues below President Donald Trump is reportedly considering pardoning Stone and has spoken strongly against what has happened to his long-time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s very tough what they did to Roger Stone , compared to what they do to other people on their side , ” Trump said last year about the case .
Big League Politics has reported that the jury foreman in the Stone case was a former Democratic presidential candidate who is on the record being apart of the anti-Trump far-left resistance : One juror in the case against long-time Trump associate Roger Stone has been revealed as a member of the Trump-hating resistance by her social media profile… In addition , Hart @ @ @ @ @ @ @ activist and even ran for Congress as a Democrat in Tennessee… Journalist Mike Cernovich pointed out the fact that this Democrat activist and anti-Trump resistance member was even allowed on the jury shows a stunning level of misconduct by the judge who presided over the case .
“ How did a federal court judge ever allow a far left wing activist to sit on a case where a close Trump associate faced trial ?
” Cernovich asked .
“ The Roger Stone prosecution is a disgrace , it ’ s lawless , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” he added .
“ I ’ ve known Roger over the years .
He ’ s a nice guy .
A lot of people like him , and he got hit very hard , as did Gen. ( Michael ) Flynn , ” he added .
Judge Andrew Napolitano , who has emerged as one of the most pointed critics of President Trump since his election , has even admitted that Stone ’ s case should be thrown out due to the improprieties that occurred during his trial .
“ [ They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about her and when did you know it and why didn ’ t you tell us that you knew about her prejudice ?
” Napolitano asked , referring to the four prosecutors responsible for Stone ’ s railroading who have since resigned .
“ You have a duty , an affirmative obligation to reveal to us when we selected you , [ of ] the existence of these tweets in which you were so harshly negative about the president and the people that support him , ” Napolitano said , referring to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost any judge in the country would order a new trial , ” he added .
Jackson did not agree with Napolitano ’ s assessment and chose to make an example of Stone , whose Soviet-style show trial was a major affront to justice .

RAILROADED: Roger Stone Sentenced to 40 Months in Prison with Status of Case Up in the Air
Political operative Roger Stone was sentenced to 40 months in prison by a federal judge today, even with the status of his case up in the air after severe improprieties were found in the proceedings.
US District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson made it clear that she meant to send a political statement with her strict sentencing of Stone.
“This is intolerable to the administration of justice and the court should not sit idly by, shrug its shoulders and say well that is just Roger being Roger,” said Jackson, who was appointed to the bench by former President Barack Hussein Obama, before issuing the sentence.
“The truth still exists. The truth still matters. Roger Stone’s insistence that it doesn’t … [is] a threat to our most fundamental institutions,” she later added.
President Donald Trump is reportedly considering pardoning Stone and has spoken strongly against what has happened to his long-time confidant.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1227122206783811585
“I think it’s very tough what they did to Roger Stone, compared to what they do to other people on their side,” Trump said last year about the case.
Big League Politics has reported that the jury foreman in the Stone case was a former Democratic presidential candidate who is on the record being apart of the anti-Trump far-left resistance:
One juror in the case against long-time Trump associate Roger Stone has been revealed as a member of the Trump-hating resistance by her social media profile… In addition, Hart has been a long time Democrat Party activist and even ran for Congress as a Democrat in Tennessee… Journalist Mike Cernovich pointed out the fact that this Democrat activist and anti-Trump resistance member was even allowed on the jury shows a stunning level of misconduct by the judge who presided over the case. “How did a federal court judge ever allow a far left wing activist to sit on a case where a close Trump associate faced trial?” Cernovich asked. “The Roger Stone prosecution is a disgrace, it’s lawless, and it was rigged from the beginning,” he added.
“I’ve known Roger over the years. He’s a nice guy. A lot of people like him, and he got hit very hard, as did Gen. (Michael) Flynn,” he added.
Judge Andrew Napolitano, who has emerged as one of the most pointed critics of President Trump since his election, has even admitted that Stone’s case should be thrown out due to the improprieties that occurred during his trial.
“[They should ask] what did you know about her and when did you know it and why didn’t you tell us that you knew about her prejudice?” Napolitano asked, referring to the four prosecutors responsible for Stone’s railroading who have since resigned.
“You have a duty, an affirmative obligation to reveal to us when we selected you, [of] the existence of these tweets in which you were so harshly negative about the president and the people that support him,” Napolitano said, referring to the anti-Trump jury foreman.
“I think almost any judge in the country would order a new trial,” he added.
Jackson did not agree with Napolitano’s assessment and chose to make an example of Stone, whose Soviet-style show trial was a major affront to justice.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-19--George Zimmerman Suing Pocahontas and Mayor Pete for Defamation in the Trayvon Martin Case

The Hill reported that George Zimmerman is suing Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and former South Bend , Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg for comments they made about Trayvon Martin ’ s death .
Zimmerman garnered controversy in 2012 when he killed Trayvon Martin in self-defense after he was brutally assaulted .
The altercation was initiated when Zimmerman followed Martin on the suspicion that Martin was scoping the neighborhood for a potential robbery attempt .
Martin opted to escalate the situation when Zimmerman confronted him , which compelled Zimmerman to use lethal force once it became clear that Martin was savagely pummeling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rosario Dawson Comes Out as Lesbian Just One Month After She ‘ Dated ’ Cory Booker Newsweek reported that the lawsuit accuses the two Democratic presidential candidates of defaming Zimmerman by attributing Martin ’ s death to “ fear ” or “ gun violence.
” take our poll - story continues below The suit centers on two tweets the candidates posted , which included accusations of “ white supremacy ” and “ racism.
” “ My heart goes out to [ Martin ’ s mother ] @ SybrinaFulton and Trayvon ’ s family @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with us today .
We need to end gun violence and racism .
And we need to build a world where all of our children-especially young Black boys-can grow up safe and free , ” Warren tweeted .
“ Trayvon Martin would have been 25 today .
How many 25th birthdays have been stolen from us by white supremacy , gun violence , prejudice , and fear ?
” Buttigieg said in another Tweet .
“ The only ‘ fear ’ Zimmerman experienced , as established in the 2013 trial and well-covered in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Zimmerman believing he might go unconscious and die from the repeated beating of his head against the sidewalk pavement or by choking to death from the blood going down his throat due to his broken nose during the beating by Martin , ” Zimmerman ’ s attorney responded in court documents .
These court documents accuse the two candidates of pursuing a “ political agenda to garner votes in the black community.
” Zimmerman argued that he shot Martin in self-defense .
He ended up not being found guilty of second-degree murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which received national coverage .
Contrary to the mainstream media ’ s portrayal of Martin as an innocent young man , Martin had a list of suspensions in high school and was suspected of robbery in one of the suspensions , although Martin never faced criminal charges .

George Zimmerman Suing Pocahontas and Mayor Pete for Defamation in the Trayvon Martin Case
The Hill reported that George Zimmerman is suing Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg for comments they made about Trayvon Martin’s death.
Zimmerman garnered controversy in 2012 when he killed Trayvon Martin in self-defense after he was brutally assaulted.
The altercation was initiated when Zimmerman followed Martin on the suspicion that Martin was scoping the neighborhood for a potential robbery attempt. Martin opted to escalate the situation when Zimmerman confronted him, which compelled Zimmerman to use lethal force once it became clear that Martin was savagely pummeling him.
Newsweek reported that the lawsuit accuses the two Democratic presidential candidates of defaming Zimmerman by attributing Martin’s death to “fear” or “gun violence.”
The suit centers on two tweets the candidates posted, which included accusations of “white supremacy” and “racism.”
“My heart goes out to [Martin’s mother] @SybrinaFulton and Trayvon’s family and friends. He should still be with us today. We need to end gun violence and racism. And we need to build a world where all of our children-especially young Black boys-can grow up safe and free,” Warren tweeted.
“Trayvon Martin would have been 25 today. How many 25th birthdays have been stolen from us by white supremacy, gun violence, prejudice, and fear?” Buttigieg said in another Tweet.
“The only ‘fear’ Zimmerman experienced, as established in the 2013 trial and well-covered in the media, was in the context of Zimmerman believing he might go unconscious and die from the repeated beating of his head against the sidewalk pavement or by choking to death from the blood going down his throat due to his broken nose during the beating by Martin,” Zimmerman’s attorney responded in court documents. These court documents accuse the two candidates of pursuing a “political agenda to garner votes in the black community.”
Zimmerman argued that he shot Martin in self-defense.
He ended up not being found guilty of second-degree murder in the Martin case in 2013, which received national coverage.
Contrary to the mainstream media’s portrayal of Martin as an innocent young man, Martin had a list of suspensions in high school and was suspected of robbery in one of the suspensions, although Martin never faced criminal charges.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--VIDEO: Indiana Teacher Claims She Was Fired for Exposing Left-Wing ‘Social Emotional Learning’ Schem

An Indiana teacher released a viral video this week giving riveting testimony about her dismissal from a public school because of her activism efforts against left-wing educational schemes .
“ My name is Jennifer , and I am a public school teacher who is also the founder of Purple for Parents Indiana , ” she said .
“ I started Purple for Parents here to expose the truth about Red for Ed , the NEA and the radical agenda behind it.
” She believes that the National Education Association ( NEA ) is involved in a scheme to not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brainwash young minds through a sneaky overhaul of the curriculum in public schools .
Trending : SICK : Liberals Cheer Victim of Gruesome NASCAR Crash Because He Supports President Trump “ One of these hot topic issues is a push to change school culture through social emotional learning programs , ” she explained .
take our poll - story continues below “ My school is currently in the third year of its SEL program called ‘ Leader in Me.
’ It is used to educate what they call the whole child through language @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of morals and values .
As a teacher and a parent , I find this program to be very disturbing because these things should be taught by parents , ” she said .
Jennifer said she was fired last Friday from her school as a result of exposing this agenda , based on a Facebook post she made the previous Monday exposing the agenda .
Jennifer said that the school claimed she was “ making them look bad ” and being “ untruthful ” with her post .
“ I want everyone to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the truth .
I believe parents should be aware of what ’ s going on , and my concern is truly because I care about children and parental rights , ” she said .
Jennifer ’ s main concern with the SEL program is that it is being administered without parental consent , and parents have no ability to opt their children out .
“ After being fired for speaking the truth , I immediately realized I can no longer trust the school to care fairly for my daughter , and I immediately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I am deeply worried about what is going on in the public schools , and the measures that they will take to silence the truth.
” Jennifer had to choke back tears in the video when recalling how she was fired without being able to say goodbye to the students she cared for so much .
“ I am an extremely hard-worker who is always kind and professional .
It hurts me that I had to leave without saying goodbye to my students , and I have no idea what reason they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she said .
Jennifer urged people to share her video to help raise awareness of what is going on in the school system , as leftists become more bold in their exploitation of the youth .
Her entire video address can be seen here : Educational experts refer to SEL programs as “ government-sponsored personality manipulation ” and note how they can not be tested for effectiveness due to their total subjectivity .
While Education Secretary Betsy Devos claims that Common Core is dead , the underlying principles behind the standards remain firmly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have serious consequences .

VIDEO: Indiana Teacher Claims She Was Fired for Exposing Left-Wing ‘Social Emotional Learning’ Scheme
An Indiana teacher released a viral video this week giving riveting testimony about her dismissal from a public school because of her activism efforts against left-wing educational schemes.
“My name is Jennifer, and I am a public school teacher who is also the founder of Purple for Parents Indiana,” she said. “I started Purple for Parents here to expose the truth about Red for Ed, the NEA and the radical agenda behind it.”
She believes that the National Education Association (NEA) is involved in a scheme to not only elect Democrats, but also indoctrinate and brainwash young minds through a sneaky overhaul of the curriculum in public schools.
“One of these hot topic issues is a push to change school culture through social emotional learning programs,” she explained.
“My school is currently in the third year of its SEL program called ‘Leader in Me.’ It is used to educate what they call the whole child through language manipulation, role playing, and influence of morals and values. As a teacher and a parent, I find this program to be very disturbing because these things should be taught by parents,” she said.
Jennifer said she was fired last Friday from her school as a result of exposing this agenda, based on a Facebook post she made the previous Monday exposing the agenda. Jennifer said that the school claimed she was “making them look bad” and being “untruthful” with her post.
“I want everyone to know that everything that I said was the truth. I believe parents should be aware of what’s going on, and my concern is truly because I care about children and parental rights,” she said.
Jennifer’s main concern with the SEL program is that it is being administered without parental consent, and parents have no ability to opt their children out.
“After being fired for speaking the truth, I immediately realized I can no longer trust the school to care fairly for my daughter, and I immediately unenrolled her,” she said. “I am deeply worried about what is going on in the public schools, and the measures that they will take to silence the truth.”
Jennifer had to choke back tears in the video when recalling how she was fired without being able to say goodbye to the students she cared for so much.
“I am an extremely hard-worker who is always kind and professional. It hurts me that I had to leave without saying goodbye to my students, and I have no idea what reason they will give for my absence,” she said.
Jennifer urged people to share her video to help raise awareness of what is going on in the school system, as leftists become more bold in their exploitation of the youth.
Her entire video address can be seen here:
Educational experts refer to SEL programs as “government-sponsored personality manipulation” and note how they cannot be tested for effectiveness due to their total subjectivity.
While Education Secretary Betsy Devos claims that Common Core is dead, the underlying principles behind the standards remain firmly in place. Exposing the agenda can have serious consequences.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--New York Library Plans LGBT Re-Education Program After Community Rejects ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’

Activists in Rye , New York have successfully averted a showing of “ drag queen story hour ” in their community library , but the library is pushing back with an LGBT re-education program meant to indoctrinate young minds into the perverted lifestyle .
The activists , including citizen journalists Robin Janovich and Tom McDermott of The Rye Record , questioned a showing of drag queen story hour scheduled for the library on Feb. 8 .
“ Are families likely to bring their young children to a program that uses drag queens to focus on inclusivity ?
Why are we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ young ?
Are we replacing bedtime stories , which take children out of themselves and out into other , far more interesting worlds , with discussions of sexual differences when they are innocent sponges ?
” the reporters asked .
Trending : SICK : Liberals Cheer Victim of Gruesome NASCAR Crash Because He Supports President Trump The proposed story hour event was geared toward children aged 3-8 years old and was billed as a teaching experience to “ celebrate difference , learn empathy , and create crafts ” and “ celebrate diversity while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poll - story continues below Citizens in Rye started asking questions and began to cause a stir among the community as people began to question why these perverts were being allowed intimate access to children .
“ What happened to bringing joy and delight to our children and grandchildren , rather than assaulting them with political correctness ?
” one concerned citizen asked .
“ If the # MeToo Movement has taught us one thing , isn ’ t it that men dressing up as women for entertainment isn ’ t progress ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ resulted in the event being postponed , but Rye Free Reeding Room Director Chris Shoemaker announced that they would instead bring in “ educators ” to push LGBT propaganda instead of drag queens .
“ But nearly all of those emails were anonymous , so I couldn ’ t respond to them individually , ” Shoemaker said .
“ They were form letters asking that the library be neutral in its viewpoints and not create an unwelcome environment.
” “ After looking at all the feedback and considering whether we should be using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Shoemaker continued , “ I decided the library should pause and refocus on engaging different educators.
” Meanwhile , pro-degeneracy advocates such as Rye resident Joie Cooney and the City of Rye ’ s Human Rights Commission are pushing to get story hour reinstated .
They want children to be groomed by this vile group of predators out to corrupt the souls of the children .
In other states , drag queens have been completely unvetted before being allowed to read creepy stories about gender and sexuality to children .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administer story hour events to kids .
The organizers have done absolutely nothing to assure that drag queens receive criminal background checks beforehand , and there could be dozens if not hundreds of more predators using story hour as a means to find unsuspecting prey .
The people of Rye , as well as the rest of the country , will require nothing short of eternal vigilance to protect the innocence of children from LGBT predators .

New York Library Plans LGBT Re-Education Program After Community Rejects ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’
Activists in Rye, New York have successfully averted a showing of “drag queen story hour” in their community library, but the library is pushing back with an LGBT re-education program meant to indoctrinate young minds into the perverted lifestyle.
The activists, including citizen journalists Robin Janovich and Tom McDermott of The Rye Record, questioned a showing of drag queen story hour scheduled for the library on Feb. 8.
“Are families likely to bring their young children to a program that uses drag queens to focus on inclusivity? Why are we foisting conversations on inclusivity on children that young? Are we replacing bedtime stories, which take children out of themselves and out into other, far more interesting worlds, with discussions of sexual differences when they are innocent sponges?” the reporters asked.
The proposed story hour event was geared toward children aged 3-8 years old and was billed as a teaching experience to “celebrate difference, learn empathy, and create crafts” and “celebrate diversity while building confidence in self-expression.”
Citizens in Rye started asking questions and began to cause a stir among the community as people began to question why these perverts were being allowed intimate access to children.
“What happened to bringing joy and delight to our children and grandchildren, rather than assaulting them with political correctness?” one concerned citizen asked.
“If the #MeToo Movement has taught us one thing, isn’t it that men dressing up as women for entertainment isn’t progress?” asked another individual.
The activism resulted in the event being postponed, but Rye Free Reeding Room Director Chris Shoemaker announced that they would instead bring in “educators” to push LGBT propaganda instead of drag queens.
“But nearly all of those emails were anonymous, so I couldn’t respond to them individually,” Shoemaker said. “They were form letters asking that the library be neutral in its viewpoints and not create an unwelcome environment.”
“After looking at all the feedback and considering whether we should be using an adult performer to spread this message,” Shoemaker continued, “I decided the library should pause and refocus on engaging different educators.”
Meanwhile, pro-degeneracy advocates such as Rye resident Joie Cooney and the City of Rye’s Human Rights Commission are pushing to get story hour reinstated. They want children to be groomed by this vile group of predators out to corrupt the souls of the children.
In other states, drag queens have been completely unvetted before being allowed to read creepy stories about gender and sexuality to children. This has resulted in pedophiles being allowed to administer story hour events to kids. The organizers have done absolutely nothing to assure that drag queens receive criminal background checks beforehand, and there could be dozens if not hundreds of more predators using story hour as a means to find unsuspecting prey.
The people of Rye, as well as the rest of the country, will require nothing short of eternal vigilance to protect the innocence of children from LGBT predators.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--RETALIATION: Planet Fitness Bans Boosie BadAzz for Calling Out Dwayne Wade and His Trans Son

Opposing the LGBT agenda to corrupt the souls of children can have serious consequences , as rap legend Boosie BadAzz has learned .
Boosie issued a blistering viral rant on his Instagram profile addressed to former NBA star Dwayne Wade while working out at Planet Fitness earlier this week .
He castigated Wade for humoring his 12-year-old son ’ s delusions that he is a girl .
In response to his rant , Planet Fitness would not allow him to work out in their facilities despite Boosie being an active member of the establishment .
Trending : Pete Buttigieg Called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ Anti-God ” “ Do not go to Planet Fitness , they racist , they haters .
They just put me out Planet Fitness for what I said about Dwyane Wade son , ” Boosie said in an Instagram post on Friday .
take our poll - story continues below Boosie blames a homosexual manager for making the decision to ban him from the facility because he had the audacity to say that a little boy ’ s genitals should not be cut off .
“ Manager who was gay refused to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my past actions on social media about gender etc.
, ” the rapper said .
Big League Politics reported on Boosie being the voice of reason and putting Wade on blast for his abusive parenting style : Boosie called out Wade for promoting his transgender kid , who the NBA legend claims is a girl .
Wade has gone on publicity junkets recently claiming that he accepts that his birth son is now a girl and urges other parents to harbor their child ’ s delusions even if it may put them in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say something about this s**t , brah .
Dwayne Wade , you gone too f**kin far , dog , ” he said to start his spirited rant .
“ That is a male , a 12-year-old , at 12 they don ’ t even know… they don ’ t even know what they next meal gon na be !
” Boosie exclaimed .
Boosie was just getting warmed up from there as he continued to let loose on the former NBA Finals MVP who has been seduced and indoctrinated by the LGBT agenda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meet a woman , anything , at 16 , and fall in love with her , but his d*ck be gone , how he gon na .. like , bruh , you going too far , dog .
Don ’ t cut his d*ck off , bruh .
Like , bruh .
For real .
If he gon na be gay , let him be gay , but don ’ t cut his d*ck off , bruh.
” “ Don ’ t cut his f**kin d*ck off , Dwayne Wade , bruh .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ trippin , dog , ” Boosie said to capstone his traditionalist appeal to Wade .
Planet Fitness has a long history of standing with the transgender community , even to the point of allowing men to shower in the female locker room .
A Michigan woman filed a lawsuit in 2015 after her Planet Fitness membership was terminated because she complained about a man identifying as trans being allowed in the female locker room .
LGBT activists are using commercial terrorism to discourage dissent from their child-targeting predatory agenda , and Boosie is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social movement .

RETALIATION: Planet Fitness Bans Boosie BadAzz for Calling Out Dwayne Wade and His Trans Son
Opposing the LGBT agenda to corrupt the souls of children can have serious consequences, as rap legend Boosie BadAzz has learned.
Boosie issued a blistering viral rant on his Instagram profile addressed to former NBA star Dwayne Wade while working out at Planet Fitness earlier this week. He castigated Wade for humoring his 12-year-old son’s delusions that he is a girl.
In response to his rant, Planet Fitness would not allow him to work out in their facilities despite Boosie being an active member of the establishment.
“Do not go to Planet Fitness, they racist, they haters. They just put me out Planet Fitness for what I said about Dwyane Wade son,” Boosie said in an Instagram post on Friday.
Boosie blames a homosexual manager for making the decision to ban him from the facility because he had the audacity to say that a little boy’s genitals should not be cut off.
“Manager who was gay refused to let me n Planet Fitness because of my past actions on social media about gender etc.,” the rapper said.
Big League Politics reported on Boosie being the voice of reason and putting Wade on blast for his abusive parenting style:
Boosie called out Wade for promoting his transgender kid, who the NBA legend claims is a girl. Wade has gone on publicity junkets recently claiming that he accepts that his birth son is now a girl and urges other parents to harbor their child’s delusions even if it may put them in extreme danger. “I gotta say something about this s**t, brah. Dwayne Wade, you gone too f**kin far, dog,” he said to start his spirited rant. “That is a male, a 12-year-old, at 12 they don’t even know… they don’t even know what they next meal gonna be!” Boosie exclaimed. Boosie was just getting warmed up from there as he continued to let loose on the former NBA Finals MVP who has been seduced and indoctrinated by the LGBT agenda. He added: “He might meet a woman, anything, at 16, and fall in love with her, but his d*ck be gone, how he gonna.. like, bruh, you going too far, dog. Don’t cut his d*ck off, bruh. Like, bruh. For real. If he gonna be gay, let him be gay, but don’t cut his d*ck off, bruh.” “Don’t cut his f**kin d*ck off, Dwayne Wade, bruh. You f**kin trippin, dog. You trippin, dog,” Boosie said to capstone his traditionalist appeal to Wade.
Planet Fitness has a long history of standing with the transgender community, even to the point of allowing men to shower in the female locker room. A Michigan woman filed a lawsuit in 2015 after her Planet Fitness membership was terminated because she complained about a man identifying as trans being allowed in the female locker room.
LGBT activists are using commercial terrorism to discourage dissent from their child-targeting predatory agenda, and Boosie is just the latest victim of this totalitarian social movement.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--Tucker Carlson Accuses Michael Bloomberg of Empowering Communist China

Fox News host Tucker called out 2020 Democrat presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg and other American leaders for enabling the rise of China on his show on February 18 , 2020 .
Carlson cites outsourcing , rising housing prices in coastal cities , and the opioid epidemic as some of the major problems afflicting America at the moment .
In his view , all of these problems are linked .
Trending : Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker : “ Anti-God ” He noted the following : Carlson asserted that “ China is no longer simply an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s becoming a dangerous enemy.
” Instead of protecting Americans from China , Carlson argues that political elites try to embrace it .
He called attention to the NBA ’ s tepid response against Chinese censorship and NBA star Lebron James ’ s cowardly defense of Chinese interests .
For Tucker , it ’ s all about making money .
Since China joined the World Trade Organization in the late 90s , trade has boomed between the two countries .
However , it has come with numerous unintended consequences .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tucker alluded to the recent case of Harvard professor Charlies Lieber and his arrest for not disclosing his work with China .
Universities like Harvard and Yale are currently under investigation for hiding hundreds of millions in donations from countries such as China and Saudi Arabia .
Carlson went to say that “ China didn ’ t just one day magically overtake us .
Our leaders made that possible .
They abetted it .
They profited from it .
They betrayed us.
” The conservative commentator highlighted how 2020 presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s authoritarian regime .
In an interview with the host of PBS ’ s “ Firing Line ” , Margaret Hoover , Bloomberg defended Chinese strongman Xi Jinping .
Michael Bloomberg : The Communist Party wants to stay in power in China , and they listen to the public .
When the public says I can ’ t breathe the air – Xi Jinping is not a dictator – he has to satisfy his constituents , so he ’ s not going to survive .
Margaret Hoover , host of PBS ’ “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a dictator ?
Bloomberg : No , he has – he has a constituency to answer to .
Bloomberg ’ s company has made strategic investments in the country , which has influenced how Bloomberg News covers China .
According to certain reports , Bloomberg News was allegedly scrapping stories that would have exposed the corruption of Xi ’ s family members .
The Fox news host concluded with the following statement : The saddest and most infuriating part is that none of this needed to happen in the first place .
China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overtake us .
Our leaders made that possible .
They abetted it .
They profited from it .
They betrayed us .
Carlson has established himself as the leading populist voice in America .
Unlike other commentators , he will attack sacred cows like China and go after political elites who betray American interests for short-term profits .

Tucker Carlson Accuses Michael Bloomberg of Empowering Communist China
Fox News host Tucker called out 2020 Democrat presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg and other American leaders for enabling the rise of China on his show on February 18, 2020.
Carlson cites outsourcing, rising housing prices in coastal cities, and the opioid epidemic as some of the major problems afflicting America at the moment.
In his view, all of these problems are linked.
He noted the following:
Those jobs that were outsourced, they went to China. Those rising home prices, all-cash Chinese buyers are a major contributor to that, though it’s almost never said out loud. Fentanyl – made in China with the knowledge and tacit approval of the Chinese Communist Party.
Carlson asserted that “China is no longer simply an economic rival of the United States; it’s becoming a dangerous enemy.”
Instead of protecting Americans from China, Carlson argues that political elites try to embrace it.
He called attention to the NBA’s tepid response against Chinese censorship and NBA star Lebron James’s cowardly defense of Chinese interests.
For Tucker, it’s all about making money.
Since China joined the World Trade Organization in the late 90s, trade has boomed between the two countries.
However, it has come with numerous unintended consequences.
One of those being increased corporate espionage.
Tucker alluded to the recent case of Harvard professor Charlies Lieber and his arrest for not disclosing his work with China.
Universities like Harvard and Yale are currently under investigation for hiding hundreds of millions in donations from countries such as China and Saudi Arabia.
Carlson went to say that “China didn’t just one day magically overtake us. Our leaders made that possible. They abetted it. They profited from it. They betrayed us.”
The conservative commentator highlighted how 2020 presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg has been an apologist for China’s authoritarian regime.
In an interview with the host of PBS’s “Firing Line”, Margaret Hoover, Bloomberg defended Chinese strongman Xi Jinping.
Michael Bloomberg: The Communist Party wants to stay in power in China, and they listen to the public. When the public says I can’t breathe the air – Xi Jinping is not a dictator – he has to satisfy his constituents, so he’s not going to survive. Margaret Hoover, host of PBS’ “Firing Line”: He is not a dictator? Bloomberg: No, he has – he has a constituency to answer to.
Bloomberg’s company has made strategic investments in the country, which has influenced how Bloomberg News covers China.
According to certain reports, Bloomberg News was allegedly scrapping stories that would have exposed the corruption of Xi’s family members.
The Fox news host concluded with the following statement:
The saddest and most infuriating part is that none of this needed to happen in the first place. China didn’t just one day magically overtake us. Our leaders made that possible. They abetted it. They profited from it. They betrayed us.
Carlson has established himself as the leading populist voice in America.
Unlike other commentators, he will attack sacred cows like China and go after political elites who betray American interests for short-term profits.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--INTERVIEW: This Texan Running For Congress Plans to Protect Her State By Securing The Border

Maria Espinoza is one of the most ardent advocates for border security in America .
She is the co-founder and National Director of The Remembrance Project .
She lived and worked in D.C. for two years supporting President Donald Trump ’ s America First policies .
Espinoza also serves on the Texas Public Policy Foundation ’ s Border Security Coalition in D.C. , through her organization The Remembrance Project .
She is a listed speaker for the Republican Party of Texas .
Espinoza is currently running for Texas ’ s 7th Congressional District as the sole immigration patriot candidate in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of chatting with Espinoza about her current congressional run .
Trending : Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker : “ Anti-God ” • Why are you running for office ?
take our poll - story continues below For over 10 years , through The Remembrance Project , I have educated , cajoled and persuaded politicians to enforce our existing immigration laws and to prosecute those who either ignore or thwart laws that help keep America safe .
I ’ ve watched illegal aliens through night vision glasses carrying large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Patrol agents .
I have testified on National Security in front of the US Congress alongside the president of the Border Patrol Council .
I believe I can affect policy at the federal level .
For example , I wrote directly to the last ( remaining ) 4 GOP Presidential candidates in 2016 asking for help for families whose loved ones had been killed by illegal aliens .
As a result of this work , I received a notification from candidate Trump promising me that he would do more for the bereaved families @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dads and angel families I introduced to him in 2015-16 .
These efforts resulted in the formation of the President ’ s Office of VOICE .
With all of this work by me and other patriots , The Wall is not still built , sanctuary policies still exist and liberal mayors and judges snub their noses to our laws .
I believe that I could make a difference inside the Halls of Congress .
Furthermore , in my CD-7 race , there is an open borders candidate propped-up by the same multi-million-dollar corporation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that would have eliminated Sanctuary policies in Texas .
I must also run for this seat in order to protect Texas families , and win back the seat from Democrat Liz Fletcher .
• In your opinion , what is the biggest issue heading into the 2020 elections ?
I agree with a poll conducted last summer that the top two ( 2 ) concerns of voters are : • Lack of confidence in GOP leadership at the state and local levels , bordering on distrust in their loyalty to our core GOP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ve been saying for 10 years .
• Who do you see as the larger immediate threat to your campaign : Establishment Republicans or the radical Left ?
Hands down , and through past experience… the establishment Republicans .
Especially during the primary election cycle , Republican establishment has sold out to the open borders multi-million dollar donors who fill the politicians ’ re-election campaign coffers with the blood money of murdered Americans .
This is a too high of a price for our angel moms , dads and angel families @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue to have an endless supply of illegal alien workers – and a permanent underclass .
Further , it not only prevents “ America First ” candidates from being successful , but also instills a feeling among other grass-roots patriots that they will never have the funds to run a successful campaign , so “ why even try ?
” These truths and consequences all but assure that regular , middle-class Americans will no longer be able to hold public office , especially at state and federal levels .
• What sets you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s 7th Congressional District ?
I am the only candidate who has federal legislative experience in reviewing and recommending legislation .
I personally hosted Donald Trump as “ Keynote Speaker ” at the September 17 , 2016 National Conference in Houston TX .
Unlike my opponents , I have first-hand experience dealing with the Swamp .
I understand from experience that the Deep State special interest politicians and groups “ buy ” their candidates .
I can not be bought !
In this race , I ’ m the only candidate with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and enforcement of our federal interior immigration laws , and placing families first .
There is no need for me to conjure up a fake persona and attempt to camouflage an abysmal voting record .
I was 100 % on board from day one with President Trump and his America First policies .
I have travelled extensively , not only across Texas , but all across America advocating for secure communities , building of the wall , and against Sanctuary Cities • Who has endorsed your campaign so far ?
I have received @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tom Homan , former Immigration and Customs Enforcement ( I.C.E . )
Director for President Trump • Kris Kobach , President Trump ’ s former Transition Team and Voter Integrity Commission member and the former Secretary of State for Kansas ( currently running for U.S. Senate in Kansas ) • Since immigration is your strong suit , what immigration policies will you be pushing for in Congress ?
I plan on supporting President Trump ’ s efforts to fund and build a border wall , and enforce existing immigration laws .
Additionally , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it a crime for any governmental official to refuse to cooperate with the federal government in executing legal federal detainers ( e.g.
, refusing to cooperate with I.C.E. )
.
Eliminating sanctuary jurisdiction policies is another big priority for me .
I also want make E-verify mandatory for all business across the nation and eliminate chain migration .
All in all , I want to fully enforce current immigration laws and deport all illegal aliens .
• What is your take on legal migration ?
Do you think we have too much of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ migration ” you mean entering the U.S. through application for asylum , then I believe that the current system allowing asylum seeker to enter the U.S. , is flawed .
Today , 90 % of all asylum applications are ruled unsubstantiated in our system of immigration courts .
This costs American taxpayers millions of dollars each year to process these fraudulent claims .
I support a federal law mandating that all asylum claims be adjudicated ONLY in the claimants ’ country ( ies ) of origin .
• Do you agree with conservative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the U.S. implement a moratorium on legal immigration before we consider any expansion of legal migration ?
I am in support of a temporary moratorium on until : • Congress passes and the President signs a law ending the practice of non-merit ( e.g.
, ‘ chain ” ) migration ” .
• The USCIS has in place a fully functional vetting process to determine the veracity of documents that migrants present , thus eliminating the USICS policy of assuming that unverifiable documents are valid .
• The U.S. State Department fully enforces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to speak and write in English and to verify that those persons have the means of self-reliance and who will not become a burden to the US taxpayer .
• So far into Trump ’ s first term in office , how would you rate his performance ?
President Donald Trump , to date , has done an excellent job .
While his successes are many and widely praised for his historic accomplishments , his failings are : • On several occasions in memory , he has taken the advice of untrustworthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ turning on him , and slowing and stopping many of his “ America First ” promises .
• Not following through with the wall is a failure .
His progress is slow and he is not using all of the powers of the Presidency to provide funding .
BLP will be following Espinoza ’ s campaign closely .
She is the clear-cut choice for any immigration patriot living in Texas ’ s 7th district .

INTERVIEW: This Texan Running For Congress Plans to Protect Her State By Securing The Border
Maria Espinoza is one of the most ardent advocates for border security in America. She is the co-founder and National Director of The Remembrance Project. She lived and worked in D.C. for two years supporting President Donald Trump’s America First policies. Espinoza also serves on the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s Border Security Coalition in D.C., through her organization The Remembrance Project. She is a listed speaker for the Republican Party of Texas.
Espinoza is currently running for Texas’s 7th Congressional District as the sole immigration patriot candidate in that race.
BLP had the pleasure of chatting with Espinoza about her current congressional run.
Why are you running for office?
For over 10 years, through The Remembrance Project, I have educated, cajoled and persuaded politicians to enforce our existing immigration laws and to prosecute those who either ignore or thwart laws that help keep America safe.
I’ve watched illegal aliens through night vision glasses carrying large backpacks escape the grasp of our Border Patrol agents. I have testified on National Security in front of the US Congress alongside the president of the Border Patrol Council.
I believe I can affect policy at the federal level.
For example, I wrote directly to the last (remaining) 4 GOP Presidential candidates in 2016 asking for help for families whose loved ones had been killed by illegal aliens. As a result of this work, I received a notification from candidate Trump promising me that he would do more for the bereaved families like the dozens of angel moms, dads and angel families I introduced to him in 2015-16. These efforts resulted in the formation of the President’s Office of VOICE.
With all of this work by me and other patriots, The Wall is not still built, sanctuary policies still exist and liberal mayors and judges snub their noses to our laws. I believe that I could make a difference inside the Halls of Congress.
Furthermore, in my CD-7 race, there is an open borders candidate propped-up by the same multi-million-dollar corporation that in 2011 derailed the SB9 bill that would have eliminated Sanctuary policies in Texas. I must also run for this seat in order to protect Texas families, and win back the seat from Democrat Liz Fletcher.
In your opinion, what is the biggest issue heading into the 2020 elections?
I agree with a poll conducted last summer that the top two (2) concerns of voters are:
Lack of confidence in GOP leadership at the state and local levels, bordering on distrust in their loyalty to our core GOP principles. Illegal immigration, as I’ve been saying for 10 years.
Who do you see as the larger immediate threat to your campaign: Establishment Republicans or the radical Left?
Hands down, and through past experience… the establishment Republicans.
Especially during the primary election cycle, Republican establishment has sold out to the open borders multi-million dollar donors who fill the politicians’ re-election campaign coffers with the blood money of murdered Americans. This is a too high of a price for our angel moms, dads and angel families to pay so that those donors will continue to have an endless supply of illegal alien workers – and a permanent underclass. Further, it not only prevents “America First” candidates from being successful, but also instills a feeling among other grass-roots patriots that they will never have the funds to run a successful campaign, so “why even try?” These truths and consequences all but assure that regular, middle-class Americans will no longer be able to hold public office, especially at state and federal levels.
What sets you apart from your Republican rivals in Texas’s 7th Congressional District?
I am the only candidate who has federal legislative experience in reviewing and recommending legislation. I personally hosted Donald Trump as “Keynote Speaker” at the September 17, 2016 National Conference in Houston TX.
Unlike my opponents, I have first-hand experience dealing with the Swamp. I understand from experience that the Deep State special interest politicians and groups “buy” their candidates. I cannot be bought!
In this race, I’m the only candidate with a 10-year resume of promoting border enforcement and enforcement of our federal interior immigration laws, and placing families first. There is no need for me to conjure up a fake persona and attempt to camouflage an abysmal voting record. I was 100% on board from day one with President Trump and his America First policies.
I have travelled extensively, not only across Texas, but all across America advocating for secure communities, building of the wall, and against Sanctuary Cities
Who has endorsed your campaign so far?
I have received endorsements from the following individuals:
Tom Homan, former Immigration and Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.) Director for President Trump Sid Miller, Texas Agriculture Commissioner Kris Kobach, President Trump’s former Transition Team and Voter Integrity Commission member and the former Secretary of State for Kansas (currently running for U.S. Senate in Kansas) Tom Tancredo, former Colorado Congressman and 2008 GOP Presidential Candidate Chris Salcedo, Newsmax TV Host, Radio Broadcaster (KSEV, WBAB)
Since immigration is your strong suit, what immigration policies will you be pushing for in Congress?
I plan on supporting President Trump’s efforts to fund and build a border wall, and enforce existing immigration laws. Additionally, I plan on passing federal legislation making it a crime for any governmental official to refuse to cooperate with the federal government in executing legal federal detainers (e.g., refusing to cooperate with I.C.E.).
Eliminating sanctuary jurisdiction policies is another big priority for me. I also want make E-verify mandatory for all business across the nation and eliminate chain migration.
All in all, I want to fully enforce current immigration laws and deport all illegal aliens.
What is your take on legal migration? Do you think we have too much of it?
If, by “legal migration” you mean entering the U.S. through application for asylum, then I believe that the current system allowing asylum seeker to enter the U.S., is flawed. Today, 90% of all asylum applications are ruled unsubstantiated in our system of immigration courts. This costs American taxpayers millions of dollars each year to process these fraudulent claims. I support a federal law mandating that all asylum claims be adjudicated ONLY in the claimants’ country(ies) of origin.
Do you agree with conservative commentator Ann Coulter’s recommendation that the U.S. implement a moratorium on legal immigration before we consider any expansion of legal migration?
I am in support of a temporary moratorium on all legal migration until:
Congress passes and the President signs a law ending the practice of non-merit (e.g., ‘chain”) migration”. The USCIS has in place a fully functional vetting process to determine the veracity of documents that migrants present, thus eliminating the USICS policy of assuming that unverifiable documents are valid. The U.S. State Department fully enforces its regulations that all new citizens be able to speak and write in English and to verify that those persons have the means of self-reliance and who will not become a burden to the US taxpayer.
So far into Trump’s first term in office, how would you rate his performance?
President Donald Trump, to date, has done an excellent job. While his successes are many and widely praised for his historic accomplishments, his failings are:
On several occasions in memory, he has taken the advice of untrustworthy people, resulting in those underserving people turning on him, and slowing and stopping many of his “America First” promises. Not following through with the wall is a failure. His progress is slow and he is not using all of the powers of the Presidency to provide funding.
BLP will be following Espinoza’s campaign closely.
She is the clear-cut choice for any immigration patriot living in Texas’s 7th district.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--New Mexico Will Be Newest State to Enact Unconstitutional ‘Red Flag’ Gun Confiscation

The state of New Mexico will be the next state to enact red flag laws that will strip due process rights from gun owners and confiscate their weapons based on an edict from a judge .
The New Mexico state house approved a red flag bill by a 39-31 vote last week .
Having previously been passed in the state senate by a 22-20 margin earlier this month , the legislation will be placed on the desk of Democrat Gov .
Michelle Lujan Grisham , who is a massive proponent of red flag laws and expected to enthusiastically sign the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an obligation to every single New Mexican , every single family , every single child that we do everything in our power that can provide just that additional layer of safety and public support , ” Lujan Grisham said about her support of red flag laws .
Trending : Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker : “ Anti-God ” The legislation was not passed unanimously by all Democrats in the state house , as legislators Harry Garcia of Grants , Raymundo Lara of Chamberino , Willie Madrid of Chaparral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ruiloba of Albuquerque , Joseph Sanchez of Alcalde and Candie Sweetser of Deming joined Republicans in opposing the bill .
take our poll - story continues below New Mexico will be the 18th state , along with Washington D.C. , to pass this unconstitutional measure that eviscerates multiple amendments of the U.S. Constitution .
Counties are passing resolutions to urge Gov .
Lujan Grisham not to sign the bill into law .
“ Senate Bill 5 and House Bill 7 make criminals of innocent citizens and deprive them of due process of law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gun-owners living with a person made subject to a Red Flag order to not secure their guns from that person , even if the gun owner had no knowledge of the Red Flag order or had no control over another person ’ s actions , ” a resolution passed in Lincoln County states .
In addition to Lincoln County , the counties of Otero and Torrence have passed resolutions condemning red flag laws .
Doña Ana County passed a resolution in favor of the anti-constitutional measures .
Big League Politics has highlighted some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flag laws that have occurred throughout the country , including a military veteran who lost his weapons due to a case of mistaken identity in Florida ; a doctor snitching on a patient who was suing him so his guns would be confiscated in New Jersey ; an Iraq War veteran who lost his guns after protesting the governor while wearing a MAGA hat in Oregon ; and a man who lost his life when police came to confiscate his guns in Maryland .
Sadly , it will not be long before these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state of New Mexico .
Lujan Grisham is expected to sign the legislation into law in the upcoming days .

New Mexico Will Be Newest State to Enact Unconstitutional ‘Red Flag’ Gun Confiscation
The state of New Mexico will be the next state to enact red flag laws that will strip due process rights from gun owners and confiscate their weapons based on an edict from a judge.
The New Mexico state house approved a red flag bill by a 39-31 vote last week. Having previously been passed in the state senate by a 22-20 margin earlier this month, the legislation will be placed on the desk of Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, who is a massive proponent of red flag laws and expected to enthusiastically sign the bill into law.
“We have an obligation to every single New Mexican, every single family, every single child that we do everything in our power that can provide just that additional layer of safety and public support,” Lujan Grisham said about her support of red flag laws.
The legislation was not passed unanimously by all Democrats in the state house, as legislators Harry Garcia of Grants, Raymundo Lara of Chamberino, Willie Madrid of Chaparral, Rudy Martinez of Bayard, Patricio Ruiloba of Albuquerque, Joseph Sanchez of Alcalde and Candie Sweetser of Deming joined Republicans in opposing the bill.
New Mexico will be the 18th state, along with Washington D.C., to pass this unconstitutional measure that eviscerates multiple amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Counties are passing resolutions to urge Gov. Lujan Grisham not to sign the bill into law.
“Senate Bill 5 and House Bill 7 make criminals of innocent citizens and deprive them of due process of law by making it a criminal offense for gun-owners living with a person made subject to a Red Flag order to not secure their guns from that person, even if the gun owner had no knowledge of the Red Flag order or had no control over another person’s actions,” a resolution passed in Lincoln County states.
In addition to Lincoln County, the counties of Otero and Torrence have passed resolutions condemning red flag laws. Doña Ana County passed a resolution in favor of the anti-constitutional measures.
Big League Politics has highlighted some of the worst abuses stemming from red flag laws that have occurred throughout the country, including a military veteran who lost his weapons due to a case of mistaken identity in Florida; a doctor snitching on a patient who was suing him so his guns would be confiscated in New Jersey; an Iraq War veteran who lost his guns after protesting the governor while wearing a MAGA hat in Oregon; and a man who lost his life when police came to confiscate his guns in Maryland.
Sadly, it will not be long before these kind of heinous abuses come to the state of New Mexico. Lujan Grisham is expected to sign the legislation into law in the upcoming days.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--Gov. Ron DeSantis Puts Anti-E-Verify Republicans On Notice

As a battle over a strong statewide E-Verify law heats up in Tallahassee , Florida Governor Rick DeSantis is cautioning Republicans who seek to neuter the law over the ire they ’ ll face from conservative voters .
Florida is set to pass a E-Verify law that will prevent businesses from hiring illegal immigrants as workers .
Currently in the Florida Senate committee process , big business interests are seeking to institute special exemptions for industries that commonly hire illegals .
DeSantis is pushing back hard against the effort to put free passes in the legislation for the agricultural industry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the law ’ s enforcement mechanism .
Elements seeking to neuter the Florida E-Verify system want employers to merely promise they aren ’ t hiring illegals , as opposed to making them definitively prove it .
Trending : Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker : “ Anti-God ” DeSantis was clear about warning Republicans who try to neuter the e-Verify proposal when speaking to the press outside of the state capital on Wednesday .
DeSantis ’ warning to Republicans who tacitly support giveaways of cheap labor and non-enforcement of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any legislator who considers themselves a conservative , and relies upon a conservative constituency .
Senator Tom Lee , who represents Florida ’ s 20th district , is cautioning that Governor DeSantis could veto the entire bill and force lawmakers to start over if they stuff it full of exemptions for scofflaw big business interests .
He says that the effort to make employers merely promise to hire illegals is no different than instituting an impotent “ honor system.
” The law currently will mandate that businesses in Florida verify their employees ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Got a hot news tip for us ?
Photos or video of a breaking story ?
Send your tips , photos and videos to tips @ bigleaguepolitics.com .
All hot tips are immediately forwarded to BLP Staff .
Have something to say ?
Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions @ bigleaguepolitics.com .

Gov. Ron DeSantis Puts Anti-E-Verify Republicans On Notice
As a battle over a strong statewide E-Verify law heats up in Tallahassee, Florida Governor Rick DeSantis is cautioning Republicans who seek to neuter the law over the ire they’ll face from conservative voters.
Florida is set to pass a E-Verify law that will prevent businesses from hiring illegal immigrants as workers. Currently in the Florida Senate committee process, big business interests are seeking to institute special exemptions for industries that commonly hire illegals.
DeSantis is pushing back hard against the effort to put free passes in the legislation for the agricultural industry. Another area of contention is over the law’s enforcement mechanism. Elements seeking to neuter the Florida E-Verify system want employers to merely promise they aren’t hiring illegals, as opposed to making them definitively prove it.
DeSantis was clear about warning Republicans who try to neuter the e-Verify proposal when speaking to the press outside of the state capital on Wednesday.
As e-verify moves forward in Tallahassee @GovRonDeSantis has a warning, “I would not want to be a Republican officeholder running in a Republican primary who voted against doing something on this”https://t.co/PnffkZd2Jd pic.twitter.com/GdCeTj9n6a — Christopher Heath (@CHeathWFTV) February 19, 2020
DeSantis’ warning to Republicans who tacitly support giveaways of cheap labor and non-enforcement of immigration law should be taken seriously by any legislator who considers themselves a conservative, and relies upon a conservative constituency.
Senator Tom Lee, who represents Florida’s 20th district, is cautioning that Governor DeSantis could veto the entire bill and force lawmakers to start over if they stuff it full of exemptions for scofflaw big business interests. He says that the effort to make employers merely promise to hire illegals is no different than instituting an impotent “honor system.”
The law currently will mandate that businesses in Florida verify their employees’ legal status by July of 2022.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--INSANE: Google Removes Gender Labels From Image Recognition Technology to Stop ‘Unfair Bias’

Google ’ s Cloud Vision API , an artificial intelligence tool that helps people analyze images , will no longer include gender labels in their software , the company has announced .
The AI tool will be made less effective due to politically correct concerns regarding the LGBT community , as males and females with mangled , disfigured genitalia are now allowed to masquerade as if they are their opposite gender in society .
“ Given that a person ’ s gender can not be inferred by appearance , we have decided to remove these labels in order to align @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , specifically Principle # 2 : Avoid creating or reinforcing unfair bias , ” the email making the announcement stated .
Trending : Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker : “ Anti-God ” Google ’ s AI principles regarding bias read as follows : “ AI algorithms and datasets can reflect , reinforce , or reduce unfair biases .
We recognize that distinguishing fair from unfair biases is not always simple , and differs across cultures and societies .
We will seek to avoid unjust impacts on people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as race , ethnicity , gender , nationality , income , sexual orientation , ability , and political or religious belief.
” take our poll - story continues below Google is receiving praise from Silicon Valley for their decision to conform to LGBT dogma .
“ Anytime you automatically classify people , whether that ’ s their gender , or their sexual orientation , you need to decide on which categories you use in the first place — and this comes with lots of assumptions , ” Frederike Kaltheuner , a Mozilla tech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Classifying people as male or female assumes that gender is binary .
Anyone who doesn ’ t fit it will automatically be misclassified and misgendered .
So this is about more than just bias — a person ’ s gender can not be inferred by appearance .
Any AI system that tried to do that will inevitably misgender people , ” she added .
Before making their decision to implement the change , developers were invited to discuss the proposal on the tech giant ’ s forums .
Only one individual had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about how Google is purposefully limiting their own technology and making it less effective to serve a politically correct agenda .
“ I don ’ t think political correctness has room in APIs , ” the developer wrote .
“ If I can 99 % of the times identify if someone is a man or woman , then so can the algorithm .
You don ’ t want to do it ?
Companies will go to other services.
” With Google becoming a monopoly and growing more all powerful by the day , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ competition in the marketplace before long .
The Orwellian nightmare will be super inclusive if Google has their way .

INSANE: Google Removes Gender Labels From Image Recognition Technology to Stop ‘Unfair Bias’
Google’s Cloud Vision API, an artificial intelligence tool that helps people analyze images, will no longer include gender labels in their software, the company has announced.
The AI tool will be made less effective due to politically correct concerns regarding the LGBT community, as males and females with mangled, disfigured genitalia are now allowed to masquerade as if they are their opposite gender in society.
“Given that a person’s gender cannot be inferred by appearance, we have decided to remove these labels in order to align with the Artificial Intelligence Principles at Google, specifically Principle #2: Avoid creating or reinforcing unfair bias,” the email making the announcement stated.
Google’s AI principles regarding bias read as follows: “AI algorithms and datasets can reflect, reinforce, or reduce unfair biases. We recognize that distinguishing fair from unfair biases is not always simple, and differs across cultures and societies. We will seek to avoid unjust impacts on people, particularly those related to sensitive characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender, nationality, income, sexual orientation, ability, and political or religious belief.”
Google is receiving praise from Silicon Valley for their decision to conform to LGBT dogma.
“Anytime you automatically classify people, whether that’s their gender, or their sexual orientation, you need to decide on which categories you use in the first place — and this comes with lots of assumptions,” Frederike Kaltheuner, a Mozilla tech policy fellow, told Business Insider.
“Classifying people as male or female assumes that gender is binary. Anyone who doesn’t fit it will automatically be misclassified and misgendered. So this is about more than just bias — a person’s gender cannot be inferred by appearance. Any AI system that tried to do that will inevitably misgender people,” she added.
Before making their decision to implement the change, developers were invited to discuss the proposal on the tech giant’s forums. Only one individual had the courage to voice the obvious concern about how Google is purposefully limiting their own technology and making it less effective to serve a politically correct agenda.
“I don’t think political correctness has room in APIs,” the developer wrote. “If I can 99% of the times identify if someone is a man or woman, then so can the algorithm. You don’t want to do it? Companies will go to other services.”
With Google becoming a monopoly and growing more all powerful by the day, there may not be any room for competition in the marketplace before long. The Orwellian nightmare will be super inclusive if Google has their way.


bigleaguepolitics--2020-02-21--Michael Bloomberg Wants to Buy off Texas in Order to Destroy the Second Amendment

2020 Democrat presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg is dumping big bucks into Texas in an attempt to buy off politicians and advance his anti-gun agenda .
Ammoland reported that the gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety is vowing to spend $ 8 million in Texas .
This is part of the $ 60 million the anti-gun group plans on spending in order to elect gun-grabbing politicians in the 2020 election cycle .
The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms sees this as a “ leveraged buyout ” of the Second Amendment .
Former New York City @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to effectively buy the 2020 election .
Trending : Pete Buttigieg Called Out By His Own Brother-in-Law on Tucker : “ Anti-God ” “ Michael Bloomberg is spending a fortune on his Johnny-come-lately presidential campaign , ” CCRKBA Alan Gottlieb said .
“ But the one prize he really seems to want—a chance to turn America into his kingdom—will prove to be beyond even his financial reach .
He ’ s tried to tell us what to eat , he ’ s tried to tell us how much soda we can drink and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights.
” take our poll - story continues below “ But Bloomberg can ’ t buy American liberty , ” he added , “ because Americans aren ’ t willing to sell .
He has amassed great wealth , but that doesn ’ t give him the right to say nobody else has any rights .
And we ’ re certain that the more Bloomberg talks and the more he spends , the more people will realize this man should not be trusted with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The Everytown Action Fund pledge to spend ‘ at least ’ $ 60 million to elect gun prohibitionists to public office at all levels should alarm , if not terrify , every American voter , ” Gottlieb commented .
“ If Mike Bloomberg thinks he sees a pricetag on America , ” Gottlieb finished , “ he shouldn ’ t run for election , he should run to the nearest doctor for an eye exam , because he ’ s seeing something that isn ’ t there.
” Democrat elites are clearly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oligarch Michael Bloomberg to try to enter this race and buy it off .
Bloomberg has already spent $ 350 million in TV and radio ads to position himself prominently during the 2020 elections .
A Bloomberg presidency would be one of technocratic globalism , which would threaten basic American civil liberties such as the Second Amendment .

Michael Bloomberg Wants to Buy off Texas in Order to Destroy the Second Amendment
2020 Democrat presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg is dumping big bucks into Texas in an attempt to buy off politicians and advance his anti-gun agenda.
Ammoland reported that the gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety is vowing to spend $8 million in Texas. This is part of the $60 million the anti-gun group plans on spending in order to elect gun-grabbing politicians in the 2020 election cycle.
The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms sees this as a “leveraged buyout” of the Second Amendment. Former New York City Mayor Bloomberg is using his vast wealth to effectively buy the 2020 election.
“Michael Bloomberg is spending a fortune on his Johnny-come-lately presidential campaign,” CCRKBA Alan Gottlieb said. “But the one prize he really seems to want—a chance to turn America into his kingdom—will prove to be beyond even his financial reach. He’s tried to tell us what to eat, he’s tried to tell us how much soda we can drink and he has been unrelenting in his crusade to erase the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights.”
“But Bloomberg can’t buy American liberty,” he added, “because Americans aren’t willing to sell. He has amassed great wealth, but that doesn’t give him the right to say nobody else has any rights. And we’re certain that the more Bloomberg talks and the more he spends, the more people will realize this man should not be trusted with the future of the United States.”
“The Everytown Action Fund pledge to spend ‘at least’ $60 million to elect gun prohibitionists to public office at all levels should alarm, if not terrify, every American voter,” Gottlieb commented.
“If Mike Bloomberg thinks he sees a pricetag on America,” Gottlieb finished, “he shouldn’t run for election, he should run to the nearest doctor for an eye exam, because he’s seeing something that isn’t there.”
Democrat elites are clearly desperate, so they’ve pushed oligarch Michael Bloomberg to try to enter this race and buy it off.
Bloomberg has already spent $350 million in TV and radio ads to position himself prominently during the 2020 elections.
A Bloomberg presidency would be one of technocratic globalism, which would threaten basic American civil liberties such as the Second Amendment.