jewworldorder--2020-08-18--The Emiratis won by giving Israelis something to lose

Palestinian leaders are hard at work considering a response to last week ’ s announcement of the normalization of ties between Israel and the United Arab Emirates .
Their options are limited .
Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh was reduced to announcing Palestine would now boycott the Dubai Expo scheduled for October 2021 .
As Mahmoud Habbash , adviser to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas , complained on Monday , even the Arab League and multinational Muslim organizations seem to have been struck dumb by the agreement .
Get The Times of Israel ’ s Daily Edition by email and never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Is this the Arab nation ?
” he demanded in an interview on Palestinian television .
The “ shameful ” silence , he contended , “ shows we face a conspiracy with many participants.
” Habbash vowed that any Arab who visits Israel on a pilgrimage to Al-Aqsa will be met at the holy site with “ the shoes and spit of the people of Jerusalem.
” Moments of profound frustration can spark such anger and inspire conspiracy theories , but it ’ s not a conspiracy that has the Palestinians over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moment of reckoning with one of the most bitter facts of their situation : that the Arab world has always been more concerned with Palestine as a symbol than with Palestinians as human beings .
The vision of “ European ” or “ colonialist ” Israelis stampeding over a weak , hapless Arab people was for many Arab thinkers and political leaders a stand-in for anxieties about the broader and older Arab weakness in the face of Turkish and European dominion and imperialism .
Nowhere was Arab weakness in the modern age reified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slow-moving but seemingly implacable failure of the Palestinian cause .
It is that symbolism , what Palestine reflected in their own stories and identities , and not Palestinian suffering itself , that made anti-Semitism a majority doctrine even in places like Algeria that haven ’ t seen a Jew for six decades .
It should therefore come as no surprise , least of all to Palestinians , that the fervent concern for Palestine never really translated into meaningful succor for Palestinians , whether in the West Bank and Gaza Strip , or in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scattered throughout the region and variously denied social services , citizenship and even the right to own land by the countries in which they have resided for seven long decades .
The Palestinian national movement is now at a crossroads , one rooted in the vast gap in the Arab political imagination between Palestine the symbol and Palestine the people .
More specifically , the Palestinian story no longer resonates as powerfully with the experience of Arabs farther afield .
The oil-rich Gulf states are now respected global business hubs that view the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for investment and a source of stability .
The new threats that loom over the Arab world are regional — Iran , Turkey , Islamist factions of various sorts — or deeply local , including corruption and sectoral strife .
The Arab world has changed , the Palestinian narrative has stayed the same .
Then , too , there is the sheer intractability of the conflict .
One doesn ’ t need to like Israel to appreciate that Palestinian politics , from Hamas ’ s rejectionism to Fatah ’ s corruption , are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Palestinian cause .
In a revealing July 26 interview with Qatar ’ s Lusail News , Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh revealed something important about the interaction between Palestinian political factions and the broader Arab world .
“ Parties , who we know are on the payroll of certain superpowers ” — an apparent reference to wealthy Gulf states — “ came to us , and offered to establish new projects in the Gaza Strip to the tune of perhaps $ 15 billion , ” he said , according to a translation by MEMRI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Israeli-Egyptian blockade on the beleaguered territory , an airport and a seaport .
“ We said to them : ‘ That ’ s great .
We want an airport and a seaport , and we want to break the siege on the Gaza Strip .
This is a Palestinian demand , but what are we supposed to give in return ?
’ ” The answer : “ They want us to disband the military wings of the factions , and incorporate them in the police force .
“ Naturally , we completely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we are entitled to them and not in exchange for relinquishing our political principles , our resistance , or our weapons.
” The interviewer asked , “ What are your political principles ?
” Haniyeh ’ s reply : “ We will not recognize Israel , Palestine must stretch from the river to the sea , the right of return [ must be fulfilled ] , the prisoners must be set free , and a fully sovereign Palestinian state must be established with Jerusalem as its capital.
” Haniyeh ’ s story is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seem to reflect seriously on what it meant .
It makes sense that the wealthy parts of the Arab world would try to buy their way free of the Palestinian issue , if only because the Palestinian problem no longer resonates as a question of identity .
Those who now seek to ally with Israel against Iran or to partner with the Jewish state in commerce and technology are willing to shower the Palestinians with cash — not for the Palestinians ’ welfare , but to make the political problem they represent go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that desire was a simple demand for Israel ’ s complete disappearance , a response that probably sounded to his would-be benefactors like a demand that all the benefits that may accrue to Arab states from a relationship with Israel must be subordinated to a Palestinian narrative they no longer really identify with , and to the political needs of Palestinian factions they no longer respect .
The Arab world still cares about the Palestinians , sometimes deeply .
But the Palestinian story has nevertheless shrunk from representing a broader Arab story to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and in the process lost its grip on Arab policymaking .
It is now mostly in Islamist religious politics that one still finds intense ideological anxieties about the Palestinian question .
It ’ s no accident Hamas now finds its main patrons in Ankara and Tehran .
To the present-day leaders of Turkey and Iran , the Palestinian condition symbolizes something important about the standing and trajectory of the Muslim world .
Their support is thus assured for the time being , though only for the part of Palestinian politics raising that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normalize relations with Israel is thus a kind of liberation from the Palestinian question , to the desperate frustration of the Palestinians .
The Emiratis don ’ t even seem embarrassed by it .
The Palestinians are now at a loss .
Yet in the normalization deal lies a lesson for the Palestinians .
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan , who negotiated the agreement from the Emirati side , has demonstrated a key point about dealing with Israelis , a point the Palestinian factions , who spend surprisingly little time seriously @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , have yet to grasp .
It is so simple it can seem cartoonish : To change Israeli Jews ’ behavior , you must convince them they have something to lose .
A sentence like that is a dangerous thing to throw into the frenetic Israeli-Palestinian argument .
Some will say that powerful , wealthy Israel has a very great deal to lose — and the sooner it starts losing it the sooner that will make a dent in its behavior .
Others will say the need to end Israel ’ s military @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overwhelming moral imperative that all talk about finessing the Israeli psyche , including glib comments like “ give them something to lose , ” amounts to a monstrous abrogation of basic moral sense .
A better way to put it might be that Israelis must be made to believe they have something to gain .
At the moment , they do not .
Israelis — forgive the generalization , there are many kinds of Israelis with all kinds of views , but the term serves for the moment to describe the very large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe that Palestinian politics are capable of offering them peace .
That ’ s not a convenient conceit , it ’ s a real , driving assumption for most Israelis when they come to think about the conflict with the Palestinians .
And it ’ s rooted in long and painful experience .
Israeli withdrawals in recent decades have nearly all ended in waves of terrorism and violence so intense that they fundamentally altered Israeli voting patterns .
After the Second Intifada began in 2000 , Israel experienced the lowest voter turnout in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t won an election since 1999 because of the hundreds of terror attacks that struck Israeli cities in that intifada .
The debate about Israelis and Palestinians abroad has forgotten the bloodletting of the past two decades ; Israelis have not .
The point here isn ’ t just that Palestinians seem to Israelis to reciprocate territorial withdrawals — whether those of the Oslo agreements in the 1990s or from Gaza in 2005 — with massive violence .
It is that Israelis no longer believe a withdrawal could possibly produce any other outcome @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s attention focuses on Mahmoud Abbas and his commitment to security cooperation with Israel , Israelis notice that Abbas is in the 14th year of a five-year term — and that he won ’ t call elections because he knows he will lose them to Hamas .
Hamas is the future .
That is , Israelis believe that Abbas himself believes that any political vacuum Israel leaves behind in a future withdrawal will be filled by the terror group that has already transformed Gaza into the beleaguered battleground of its ideological war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not as ethnic strife between two peoples , but as a version of the Algerian civil war against French colonialists in the 1950s and 60s .
That was a bloody war , Hamas teaches in its sermons and schoolrooms , and the more the French bled , the faster they withdrew .
In its clinging to that colonialism frame , Hamas ignores a few pertinent facts about Israeli Jews that might make it question the wisdom of its policy of permanent belligerence .
For example , unlike those French Algerians , Israeli Jews @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s not a minor point .
When you kill the children of someone who believes they can leave , they tend to leave .
The anti-colonial wars of the 20th century were by and large successful .
But when you target the children of someone who has nowhere else to go , the response tends to be the opposite .
They become ever more determined to suppress the violence , and less willing to offer concessions not backed up by force of arms .
Haniyeh turns down billions on the basis of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so explicitly — that Israel can be dismantled , that Israeli Jews , as though they were French , have somewhere else to go .
He does not stop to consider the possibility that they are not French , have nowhere to go , and therefore that his strategy of permanent war is doomed to failure .
The global campaign for the Palestinians likes to think it models itself on the campaign around South Africa or on the US civil rights movement .
It ’ s a conceit that allows it to carefully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the narrative .
But the sidestepping of facts rarely delivers the desired outcome .
Israelis are inoculated to the boycotts and howling moral indignation of foreigners not because they are braver or dumber than other peoples who have been chastised by global communities of activists , but because no boycott , however ferociously pursued , can bring more psychological pressure to bear than the costs Hamas vows to extract from Israel after any withdrawal .
The upshot : None of this is to argue the mainstream Israeli view of the lessons of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but only that it is what stands in the way of Palestinian independence .
The Palestinians ’ most stubborn obstacle to independence lies not in the lack of a sufficiently vigorous international campaign to delegitimize the existence of an Israeli Jewish nation — as Palestinian activists seem to believe — but in Israeli Jews ’ certainty that they have only violence and pain to gain from more withdrawals , and so have little to lose , relatively speaking , from refusing to do so .
Then came the Emiratis .
A fascinating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Channel 12 revealed the dramatic effect on Israeli opinion and politics that a sliver of hope could bring .
Asked explicitly whether they preferred the normalization deal with the United Arab Emirates over Netanyahu ’ s promise of a West Bank annexation , fully 77 % of Israelis preferred the peace agreement with the UAE .
Just 16.5 % favored the annexation .
Even among self-described right-wingers the Emirati deal won handily , with a whopping 64 % to 28 % .
If a May poll found a plurality of Israelis — 44.7 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with 31.8 % opposed ) , the Sunday poll revealed how weak that support really was .
Just 16.5 % of Israelis continued to prefer annexation when it meant losing a normalization deal with a distant Arab state that has never threatened them .
Israelis did not resist Netanyahu ’ s push for annexation , but neither did they back it .
It was a proposal born on the right that advanced out of a kind of inertia , a sense that there ’ s no better alternative on offer and no real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lost a great deal last week .
They weren ’ t “ betrayed , ” as some PA leaders have complained , but simply left behind .
They didn ’ t lose vital allies who cared deeply for their cause , but one-time supporters who still vaguely support them but are tired of the intractability of their cause .
Palestinian leaders and activists may gall at the prospect , but the Emirati initiative demonstrates one thing above all : if they wish to change Israeli policy and behavior , they must convincingly explain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the catastrophe-in-waiting that so many expect .
The Palestinians must give the Israelis something to lose , or rather something to gain that might justify the risk of abandoning some significant portion of the West Bank highlands to — not to belabor the point — bitter foes .
The Palestinians don ’ t have much to give Israel , but they still have the one thing Israelis have consistently wanted from them : an end to Hamas ’ s misplaced Algerian war might do the trick .
And who knows ?
Israel might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that blockade-ending $ 15 billion offer back on the table .

Palestinian leaders are hard at work considering a response to last week’s announcement of the normalization of ties between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.
Their options are limited. Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh was reduced to announcing Palestine would now boycott the Dubai Expo scheduled for October 2021.
As Mahmoud Habbash, adviser to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, complained on Monday, even the Arab League and multinational Muslim organizations seem to have been struck dumb by the agreement.
Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Free Sign Up
“Is this the Arab nation?” he demanded in an interview on Palestinian television. The “shameful” silence, he contended, “shows we face a conspiracy with many participants.”
Habbash vowed that any Arab who visits Israel on a pilgrimage to Al-Aqsa will be met at the holy site with “the shoes and spit of the people of Jerusalem.”
In protest of the #UAE‘s decision to normalize relations with Israel, the occupying power, the Cabinet decided to cancel #Palestine‘s participation in #DubaiExpo2020, planned to open in October 2021. — PM of Palestine (@PalestinePMO) August 17, 2020
Moments of profound frustration can spark such anger and inspire conspiracy theories, but it’s not a conspiracy that has the Palestinians over a barrel. It is a long-delayed moment of reckoning with one of the most bitter facts of their situation: that the Arab world has always been more concerned with Palestine as a symbol than with Palestinians as human beings.
The vision of “European” or “colonialist” Israelis stampeding over a weak, hapless Arab people was for many Arab thinkers and political leaders a stand-in for anxieties about the broader and older Arab weakness in the face of Turkish and European dominion and imperialism. Nowhere was Arab weakness in the modern age reified more acutely and excruciatingly than in the slow-moving but seemingly implacable failure of the Palestinian cause. It is that symbolism, what Palestine reflected in their own stories and identities, and not Palestinian suffering itself, that made anti-Semitism a majority doctrine even in places like Algeria that haven’t seen a Jew for six decades.
It should therefore come as no surprise, least of all to Palestinians, that the fervent concern for Palestine never really translated into meaningful succor for Palestinians, whether in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, or in the communities of refugees and their descendants scattered throughout the region and variously denied social services, citizenship and even the right to own land by the countries in which they have resided for seven long decades.
The Palestinian national movement is now at a crossroads, one rooted in the vast gap in the Arab political imagination between Palestine the symbol and Palestine the people.
More specifically, the Palestinian story no longer resonates as powerfully with the experience of Arabs farther afield. The oil-rich Gulf states are now respected global business hubs that view the West as a resource, an arena for investment and a source of stability. The new threats that loom over the Arab world are regional — Iran, Turkey, Islamist factions of various sorts — or deeply local, including corruption and sectoral strife. The Arab world has changed, the Palestinian narrative has stayed the same.
Palestinians in the West Bank city of Ramallah burn pictures of Emirati Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (top) and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, during a demonstration against the UAE-Israeli agreement to normalize diplomatic ties, August 15, 2020. (Abbas Momani/AFP)
Haniyeh’s demand
Then, too, there is the sheer intractability of the conflict. One doesn’t need to like Israel to appreciate that Palestinian politics, from Hamas’s rejectionism to Fatah’s corruption, are a wrench in the works for the Palestinian cause.
In a revealing July 26 interview with Qatar’s Lusail News, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh revealed something important about the interaction between Palestinian political factions and the broader Arab world.
“Parties, who we know are on the payroll of certain superpowers” — an apparent reference to wealthy Gulf states — “came to us, and offered to establish new projects in the Gaza Strip to the tune of perhaps $15 billion,” he said, according to a translation by MEMRI.
Those projects included a lifting of the Israeli-Egyptian blockade on the beleaguered territory, an airport and a seaport.
Fishing boats in the Gaza City port, June 25, 2019. (Hassan Jedi/Flash90)
“We said to them: ‘That’s great. We want an airport and a seaport, and we want to break the siege on the Gaza Strip. This is a Palestinian demand, but what are we supposed to give in return?’” The answer: “They want us to disband the military wings of the factions, and incorporate them in the police force.
“Naturally, we completely rejected that offer….We want these things because we are entitled to them and not in exchange for relinquishing our political principles, our resistance, or our weapons.”
The interviewer asked, “What are your political principles?”
Haniyeh’s reply: “We will not recognize Israel, Palestine must stretch from the river to the sea, the right of return [must be fulfilled], the prisoners must be set free, and a fully sovereign Palestinian state must be established with Jerusalem as its capital.”
Haniyeh’s story is entirely believable, but he did not seem to reflect seriously on what it meant. It makes sense that the wealthy parts of the Arab world would try to buy their way free of the Palestinian issue, if only because the Palestinian problem no longer resonates as a question of identity. Those who now seek to ally with Israel against Iran or to partner with the Jewish state in commerce and technology are willing to shower the Palestinians with cash — not for the Palestinians’ welfare, but to make the political problem they represent go away.
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh tours the site of a destroyed building in Gaza City, March 27, 2019. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
Haniyeh’s response to that desire was a simple demand for Israel’s complete disappearance, a response that probably sounded to his would-be benefactors like a demand that all the benefits that may accrue to Arab states from a relationship with Israel must be subordinated to a Palestinian narrative they no longer really identify with, and to the political needs of Palestinian factions they no longer respect.
The Arab world still cares about the Palestinians, sometimes deeply. But the Palestinian story has nevertheless shrunk from representing a broader Arab story to a tragedy that affects only the Palestinians, and in the process lost its grip on Arab policymaking.
It is now mostly in Islamist religious politics that one still finds intense ideological anxieties about the Palestinian question. It’s no accident Hamas now finds its main patrons in Ankara and Tehran. To the present-day leaders of Turkey and Iran, the Palestinian condition symbolizes something important about the standing and trajectory of the Muslim world. Their support is thus assured for the time being, though only for the part of Palestinian politics raising that Islamist banner.
Hamas vs. the French
The Emirati decision to normalize relations with Israel is thus a kind of liberation from the Palestinian question, to the desperate frustration of the Palestinians. The Emiratis don’t even seem embarrassed by it.
Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh, left, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in Ankara, Turkey, January 3, 2012. (AP Photo, file)
The Palestinians are now at a loss.
Yet in the normalization deal lies a lesson for the Palestinians. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who negotiated the agreement from the Emirati side, has demonstrated a key point about dealing with Israelis, a point the Palestinian factions, who spend surprisingly little time seriously studying how Israeli Jews think and feel, have yet to grasp. It is so simple it can seem cartoonish: To change Israeli Jews’ behavior, you must convince them they have something to lose.
A sentence like that is a dangerous thing to throw into the frenetic Israeli-Palestinian argument. Some will say that powerful, wealthy Israel has a very great deal to lose — and the sooner it starts losing it the sooner that will make a dent in its behavior. Others will say the need to end Israel’s military rule over another people is such an overwhelming moral imperative that all talk about finessing the Israeli psyche, including glib comments like “give them something to lose,” amounts to a monstrous abrogation of basic moral sense.
A better way to put it might be that Israelis must be made to believe they have something to gain. At the moment, they do not.
Israelis — forgive the generalization, there are many kinds of Israelis with all kinds of views, but the term serves for the moment to describe the very large majority of them — do not actually believe that Palestinian politics are capable of offering them peace. That’s not a convenient conceit, it’s a real, driving assumption for most Israelis when they come to think about the conflict with the Palestinians.
Israeli soldiers stand guard near the scene of an apparent attempted car-ramming attack by the West Bank settlement of Halamish on May 29, 2020. (Abbas Momani/AFP)
And it’s rooted in long and painful experience. Israeli withdrawals in recent decades have nearly all ended in waves of terrorism and violence so intense that they fundamentally altered Israeli voting patterns. After the Second Intifada began in 2000, Israel experienced the lowest voter turnout in its history. The left hasn’t won an election since 1999 because of the hundreds of terror attacks that struck Israeli cities in that intifada. The debate about Israelis and Palestinians abroad has forgotten the bloodletting of the past two decades; Israelis have not.
The point here isn’t just that Palestinians seem to Israelis to reciprocate territorial withdrawals — whether those of the Oslo agreements in the 1990s or from Gaza in 2005 — with massive violence. It is that Israelis no longer believe a withdrawal could possibly produce any other outcome except massive violence.
While the world’s attention focuses on Mahmoud Abbas and his commitment to security cooperation with Israel, Israelis notice that Abbas is in the 14th year of a five-year term — and that he won’t call elections because he knows he will lose them to Hamas. Hamas is the future.
That is, Israelis believe that Abbas himself believes that any political vacuum Israel leaves behind in a future withdrawal will be filled by the terror group that has already transformed Gaza into the beleaguered battleground of its ideological war.
Hamas views the conflict with Israel not as ethnic strife between two peoples, but as a version of the Algerian civil war against French colonialists in the 1950s and 60s. That was a bloody war, Hamas teaches in its sermons and schoolrooms, and the more the French bled, the faster they withdrew.
Illustrative: Palestinian protesters place the Hamas flag on the trunk of a tree during clashes with Israeli security forces in the West Bank town of al-Ram, north of Jerusalem, on October 9, 2016. (AFP Photo/Abbas Momani)
In its clinging to that colonialism frame, Hamas ignores a few pertinent facts about Israeli Jews that might make it question the wisdom of its policy of permanent belligerence. For example, unlike those French Algerians, Israeli Jews have nowhere to go. That’s not a minor point. When you kill the children of someone who believes they can leave, they tend to leave. The anti-colonial wars of the 20th century were by and large successful. But when you target the children of someone who has nowhere else to go, the response tends to be the opposite. They become ever more determined to suppress the violence, and less willing to offer concessions not backed up by force of arms.
Haniyeh turns down billions on the basis of a strategy that still believes — he says so explicitly — that Israel can be dismantled, that Israeli Jews, as though they were French, have somewhere else to go. He does not stop to consider the possibility that they are not French, have nowhere to go, and therefore that his strategy of permanent war is doomed to failure.
New options
The global campaign for the Palestinians likes to think it models itself on the campaign around South Africa or on the US civil rights movement. It’s a conceit that allows it to carefully sidestep facts that don’t fit the narrative. But the sidestepping of facts rarely delivers the desired outcome.
Israelis are inoculated to the boycotts and howling moral indignation of foreigners not because they are braver or dumber than other peoples who have been chastised by global communities of activists, but because no boycott, however ferociously pursued, can bring more psychological pressure to bear than the costs Hamas vows to extract from Israel after any withdrawal.
Palestinian members of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of the Hamas movement, during a patrol in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip on April 27, 2020. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
The upshot: None of this is to argue the mainstream Israeli view of the lessons of the last 20 years of conflict is correct, but only that it is what stands in the way of Palestinian independence.
The Palestinians’ most stubborn obstacle to independence lies not in the lack of a sufficiently vigorous international campaign to delegitimize the existence of an Israeli Jewish nation — as Palestinian activists seem to believe — but in Israeli Jews’ certainty that they have only violence and pain to gain from more withdrawals, and so have little to lose, relatively speaking, from refusing to do so.
Then came the Emiratis. A fascinating Sunday poll conducted by Direct Polls for Channel 12 revealed the dramatic effect on Israeli opinion and politics that a sliver of hope could bring.
Asked explicitly whether they preferred the normalization deal with the United Arab Emirates over Netanyahu’s promise of a West Bank annexation, fully 77% of Israelis preferred the peace agreement with the UAE. Just 16.5% favored the annexation.
Even among self-described right-wingers the Emirati deal won handily, with a whopping 64% to 28%.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at his office in Jerusalem on a phone call with UAE leader Mohammed Bin Zayed on August 13, 2020. (Kobi Gideon/PMO)
If a May poll found a plurality of Israelis — 44.7% — in support of annexation (with 31.8% opposed), the Sunday poll revealed how weak that support really was. Just 16.5% of Israelis continued to prefer annexation when it meant losing a normalization deal with a distant Arab state that has never threatened them.
Israelis did not resist Netanyahu’s push for annexation, but neither did they back it. It was a proposal born on the right that advanced out of a kind of inertia, a sense that there’s no better alternative on offer and no real hope on the Palestinian front.
Palestinians lost a great deal last week. They weren’t “betrayed,” as some PA leaders have complained, but simply left behind. They didn’t lose vital allies who cared deeply for their cause, but one-time supporters who still vaguely support them but are tired of the intractability of their cause.
Palestinian leaders and activists may gall at the prospect, but the Emirati initiative demonstrates one thing above all: if they wish to change Israeli policy and behavior, they must convincingly explain to Israelis that a withdrawal is not the catastrophe-in-waiting that so many expect. The Palestinians must give the Israelis something to lose, or rather something to gain that might justify the risk of abandoning some significant portion of the West Bank highlands to — not to belabor the point — bitter foes.
The Palestinians don’t have much to give Israel, but they still have the one thing Israelis have consistently wanted from them: an end to Hamas’s misplaced Algerian war might do the trick.
And who knows? Israel might call up its new friends and get that blockade-ending $15 billion offer back on the table.


jewworldorder--2020-08-18--Iran Warns of Decisive Response to Any Cyber Threat

The General Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces warned that cyber threats from any state , group or individual against Iran will be responded to decisively .
The General Staff of Iran ’ s Armed Forces on Monday issued a statement about the cyberspace international law .
According to the statement , the Iranian Armed Forces believe that the cyberattacks resulting in financial damages or harm to people amount to the use of force .
“ If such operations affect the national vital infrastructures , including the defense infrastructures , they would naturally violate the principle of use of force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government or the private sector , ” it added .
The statement also emphasized that the Iranian Armed Forces will reserve the right of self-defense if the intensity of a cyberattack on Iran ’ s vital infrastructures reaches the threshold of a conventional armed attack .
It added that Iran would never start a conflict in the cyberspace , but warned that any violation of the guidelines and policies mentioned in the statement from any government , group and individual sponsored or directed by any state would allow the Iranian Armed Forces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threats at any level .
In remarks in July , Iran ’ s Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Tehran reserves the right to resort to the cyberspace or any other means to respond to the cyberattacks launched by foreign governments and regimes .
“ Iran reserves the right to take the appropriate and proportional reciprocal action at the appropriate time .
We may employ any tool to defend ourselves against the cyberattacks , including the cyberspace or other weaponry .
Moreover , we will do our utmost to prove the international responsibility of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and to make them be held accountable for their illegal measures , ” the spokesman said .

Posted on by martyrashrakat
By Staff, Agencies
The General Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces warned that cyber threats from any state, group or individual against Iran will be responded to decisively.
The General Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces on Monday issued a statement about the cyberspace international law.
According to the statement, the Iranian Armed Forces believe that the cyberattacks resulting in financial damages or harm to people amount to the use of force.
“If such operations affect the national vital infrastructures, including the defense infrastructures, they would naturally violate the principle of use of force, be it under the ownership of the government or the private sector,” it added.
The statement also emphasized that the Iranian Armed Forces will reserve the right of self-defense if the intensity of a cyberattack on Iran’s vital infrastructures reaches the threshold of a conventional armed attack.
It added that Iran would never start a conflict in the cyberspace, but warned that any violation of the guidelines and policies mentioned in the statement from any government, group and individual sponsored or directed by any state would allow the Iranian Armed Forces to give a vigorous response to the threats at any level.
In remarks in July, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Tehran reserves the right to resort to the cyberspace or any other means to respond to the cyberattacks launched by foreign governments and regimes.
“Iran reserves the right to take the appropriate and proportional reciprocal action at the appropriate time. We may employ any tool to defend ourselves against the cyberattacks, including the cyberspace or other weaponry. Moreover, we will do our utmost to prove the international responsibility of the country starting or facilitating such attacks, and to make them be held accountable for their illegal measures,” the spokesman said.
Share this: Like this: Like Loading… Related
Filed under: Iran | Tagged: AngloZionist Empire, cyberwar |


jewworldorder--2020-08-18--The Israeli army has big plans, but the economic crisis may hurt them

Haaretz.com , the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel , and analysis from Israel and the Middle East

© Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved
News and Partnerships Life and Culture Columnists and Opinion Haaretz Heb and TheMarker
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, and analysis from Israel and the Middle East
© Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved


jewworldorder--2020-08-18--Serbia SITREP: Kosovo – the endless game

by Mavro Orbini for The Saker Blog Although expected , call for Belgrade-Pristina dialogue at White House on 2nd of September [ 1 ] is suddenly getting on importance after Trump administration masterpieced ( unexpected ) Israeli-UAE Peace Deal .
[ 2 ] It seems that US diplomatic coupe is on the way just before US presidential elections .
Trump sent letters in 2018 and 2019 to Belgrade and Pristina urging them to reach a “ historic accord ” for a “ comprehensive peace ” that would include as its central element “ mutual recognition ” !
[ 3 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meeting between US mediator Grenel with Serbian/Kosovo parties on 27/08 and one that is just scheduled ?
Based on Vučic complain that Grenel announced negotiation while he expected talks on economic normalization , it seems that Trump administration is quite serious in its attempt to solve this Balkan dispute for good !
Maybe that was information conveyed by Lavrov to Vučić during June meeting ?
Vučić was pretty grim during press conference later on .
Visit of FM of Russia Lavrov to Belgrade in June might brought warning note to President Vučić as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public statement or warning would be quite undiplomatic from grandmaster of Russia´s diplomacy ! )
.
That warning note made it clear that “ Kremlin would only support solutions to the Kosovo question acceptable to Belgrade and approved by the UN Security Council.
” [ 4 ] That note was also directed toward EU and US that there are two inseparable locks for which EU , US and Vučić should find keys .
Even if they come to some agreement , on the end of that process is UN Security Council that will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agreement .
So where are we ?
Over 20 years there were several proposals on the table and the process of negotiation has clearly two phases : 1 .
Period from 2000-2012 marked Pristina success on all fronts !
Everything went smoothly – in 2008 Pristina declared independence from Serbia , in 2010 the International Court of Justice issued its opinion which found that Kosovo ’ s declaration of independence “ did not violate international law ” [ 5 ] and finally Serbia , with a gun at its head , signed with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was an inch from full recognition of Kosovo as sovereign state !
Serbia was , then , weak after 12 years of full economic destruction ( forced but uncontrolled , wild privatization that first of all , completely destroyed the most important parts of its industry ) .
At that point , it resembled situation of August in 1995 when ethnically cleansing of 250 000 native Serb by Croatia did not gathered more then few thousands protestors in Belgrade !
In 2013 population of Serbia was demoralized , with low income , without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was right moment to force Serbia to recognize independence of Kosovo without any fear of possible public backlash or violent riots against selling of “ cradle of Serbia ” !
By some divine intervention it did not happen !
That divine intervention was brought new hardline government in Pristina that wanted to further humiliate Serbia… 2 .
Period from 2013 to present day marked stalemate that did not work well for Pristina .
Suddenly from dead end Serbia , bit by bit , opened up more and more space to try to save @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then dozen of countries , cleverly motivated by Serbia , withdrew their recognition of Kosovo as a state .
Kosovo did not get any new recognition ( at the moment , at most 92 countries recognize independence of Kosovo ) .
Serbia managed to block several attempts of Kosovo for acceptance at UNESCO , Interpol , etc .
Those were painful moments for politicians in Pristina that provoked many irrational decisions that did not serve them well .
Most importantly , for the first time Serbia did manage to break monolith Pristina political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cleverly done by rising issues that divided Pristina political parties .
One of those issues was floating of idea for swap of territories .
On Albanian side , eager for such solution was Hashim Thaci [ 6 ] , president of “ Kosovo ” and Democratic Party of Kosovo , at the moment indicted for war crimes .
That started intra Albanian infighting between Thaci and Ramush Haradinaj [ 7 ] , then PM of “ Kosovo ” , president of Alliance for the future of Kosovo , also indicted war criminal that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of witnesses against him ( more then 20 of them killed by unidentified executioners ) .
That turmoil was also evident between EU and US making rift in , until then , unified front against Serbia .
Another rift between Albanian political parties on Kosovo just surfaced , few days ago , when parliament in Pristina rejected proposed legislation which was intended to enshrine in law support for the Kosovo Liberation Army ’ s wartime values [ 8 ] .
For the first time we have civilian political parties having majority in voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is fair to expect that these infightings will serve confronting EU and US interests so at the end of the day Serbia also might have some benefit from it ?
What is on the table for negotiation ?
It is clear from election in 2000 of the first government of Serbia ( after demise of Milosevic ) that no prime minister or president of Serbia was willing to sign declaration of independence for Kosovo !
Even the most West leaning ruling parties declined to do it .
Especially from 2012 until today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media persistently fueled public opinion that there is no way to recognize independence Kosovo !
Even that there will be referendum that will decide instead of politicians .
No compromise on Kosovo issue is presented every day in many newspapers , TV and radio stations inclining toward ruling party !
Today , public outcry would be much louder then in 2012 in case of independence of Kosovo !
It is clear that Serbia is ready to recognize Kosovo but not what is considered Kosovo today , not its territory , nor its independence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it was wrong to incorporate the whole territory of Kosovo ( today when speaking of Kosovo it includes two regions Kosovo and Metohija for simplicity ) into Serbia in 1912 !
Unlike Metohija , Kosovo had parts without single Serb and for many years Serbia did not enter its , these de facto , territories !
[ 9 ] In the last 20 years there were several suggested models for resolution of this conflict : 1 .
Nebojša Čović , Serbian vice PM , proposed in 2001 that two entities , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Kosovo and Metohija .
The Serbian entity would be under the protection of the Yugoslav Army and police , while the Albanian entity would have the highest grade of autonomy and stay under the protection of international powers .
2 .
In 2002 , Serbian PM Zoran Đinđić stated that “ Serbia has neither the mechanism nor the resources to reintegrate Kosovo into its legal system , or to create a form in which it will be under its sovereignty .
The division of the province , therefore , is nothing else @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still be saved.
” [ 10 ] 3 .
It seems that in 2008 Slobodan Samardžić , Minister for Kosovo and Metohija , proposed partitioning Kosovo along ethnic lines , asking the UN to ensure that Belgrade can control key institutions and functions in areas where Serbs form a majority [ 11 ] .
Existence of such proposal was strongly denied by then Serbian government .
4 .
In 2011 and in 2014 , Serbian Interior Minister Ivica Dačić proposed the partition of Kosovo as a solution to the Kosovo dispute .
[ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president of “ Kosovo ” was eager for swap of territories with Serbia – taking south part of Serbia in exchange of northern Serbian enclave in Kosovo [ 13 ] 6 .
Special US envoy for Kosovo , Richard Grenel , dropped Molotov cocktail in June 2020 announcing plans “ to create a “ little mini-Shenzhen zone ” between Kosovo-Serbia ” !
[ 14 ] It was immediately dismissed by experts and international community , making laughing stock of illiterate Americano who actually meant mini Schengen !
?
Grenel never corrected himself and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he ” expected talks on economic normalization not negotiation… ” maybe confirms accuracy of Grenel statement ?
Economic model of Shenzhen zone for Kosovo is the only viable option for this criminally infested region !
Only rapid and from outside directed economic reconstruction gives hope for better future to young generations of local Albanians .
Of course , it is difficult to see how part of political elite with background in drug and human organ trafficking could have any say in such process .
For that reason it is of great importance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ veterans and its past .
It is time for clean start with new people !
But economic model must be followed by political one that will appease political aspirations of political elites of Pristina but also take in account political limitations of their political colleagues in Belgrade .
Maybe this is where , otherwise unproductive , EU mandarins could come onboard with a modified Cyprus model – despite joining the EU as a de facto divided island , the whole of Cyprus is EU territory .
Turkish Cypriots who have , or are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ EU citizens .
EU law is suspended in areas where the Cypriot government ( Government of the Republic ) does not exercise effective control .
Cyprus has two official languages : Greek and Turkish ; only Greek is an official EU language .
[ 15 ] That offer on the table , as one of the ( best ) possible scenarios is an offer to Serbia for quick accession to EU together with Kosovo .
Kosovo will have own state that will through Serbia be part of EU and their citizens will enjoy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ From black hole it will be place for booming economic development .
Albanian side in Pristina was reminded who rules in Kosovo when US/Turkish solders invited and patrolled together with Serbian gendarmerie .
Despite their protests , KFOR ( mostly NATO ) announced that such event was in accordance with UN 1244 resolution ( that affirms Serbian sovereignty over Kosovo ) and Kumanovo agreement with Serbian government ( that Serbia has right to send up to 1000 soldiers to Kosovo ) !
!
!
Of course , all experiences so far tells us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outcome and that we might go back to partition table of Kosovo !
Serbian negotiation party will have eyes wide open on outcome of election in Montenegro on 30th of August !
That outcome will be closely related with territories that Belgrade will demand .
Bear in mind that Vučić , so far , although mentioned border correction , never said that Serbia wants ( only ) Serbian enclave in the North of Kosovo .
Other eye and hand will embrace Republika Srpska without any doubt .
Serbian public is prepared for such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has all potentials for great resolve but then again seeing faces of Lavrov and Vučić in June…

August 15, 2020
by Mavro Orbini for The Saker Blog
Although expected, call for Belgrade-Pristina dialogue at White House on 2nd of September[1] is suddenly getting on importance after Trump administration masterpieced (unexpected) Israeli-UAE Peace Deal.[2] It seems that US diplomatic coupe is on the way just before US presidential elections. Trump sent letters in 2018 and 2019 to Belgrade and Pristina urging them to reach a “historic accord” for a “comprehensive peace” that would include as its central element “mutual recognition”! [3] What did change from the first cancelled meeting between US mediator Grenel with Serbian/Kosovo parties on 27/08 and one that is just scheduled? Based on Vučic complain that Grenel announced negotiation while he expected talks on economic normalization, it seems that Trump administration is quite serious in its attempt to solve this Balkan dispute for good!
Maybe that was information conveyed by Lavrov to Vučić during June meeting? Vučić was pretty grim during press conference later on. Visit of FM of Russia Lavrov to Belgrade in June might brought warning note to President Vučić as opposition media and politicians claimed (such public statement or warning would be quite undiplomatic from grandmaster of Russia´s diplomacy!). That warning note made it clear that “Kremlin would only support solutions to the Kosovo question acceptable to Belgrade and approved by the UN Security Council.”[4] That note was also directed toward EU and US that there are two inseparable locks for which EU, US and Vučić should find keys. Even if they come to some agreement, on the end of that process is UN Security Council that will ultimately decide on the future of possible agreement.
So where are we?
Over 20 years there were several proposals on the table and the process of negotiation has clearly two phases:
1. Period from 2000-2012 marked Pristina success on all fronts! Everything went smoothly – in 2008 Pristina declared independence from Serbia, in 2010 the International Court of Justice issued its opinion which found that Kosovo’s declaration of independence “did not violate international law”[5] and finally Serbia, with a gun at its head, signed with Pristina on April 2013 Brussels agreement that was an inch from full recognition of Kosovo as sovereign state! Serbia was, then, weak after 12 years of full economic destruction (forced but uncontrolled, wild privatization that first of all, completely destroyed the most important parts of its industry). At that point, it resembled situation of August in 1995 when ethnically cleansing of 250 000 native Serb by Croatia did not gathered more then few thousands protestors in Belgrade! In 2013 population of Serbia was demoralized, with low income, without any hope for better future. It was right moment to force Serbia to recognize independence of Kosovo without any fear of possible public backlash or violent riots against selling of “cradle of Serbia”! By some divine intervention it did not happen! That divine intervention was brought new hardline government in Pristina that wanted to further humiliate Serbia…
2. Period from 2013 to present day marked stalemate that did not work well for Pristina. Suddenly from dead end Serbia, bit by bit, opened up more and more space to try to save what is possible to save. More then dozen of countries, cleverly motivated by Serbia, withdrew their recognition of Kosovo as a state. Kosovo did not get any new recognition (at the moment, at most 92 countries recognize independence of Kosovo). Serbia managed to block several attempts of Kosovo for acceptance at UNESCO, Interpol, etc. Those were painful moments for politicians in Pristina that provoked many irrational decisions that did not serve them well. Most importantly, for the first time Serbia did manage to break monolith Pristina political elites into conflicting parties. It was cleverly done by rising issues that divided Pristina political parties. One of those issues was floating of idea for swap of territories. On Albanian side, eager for such solution was Hashim Thaci[6], president of “Kosovo” and Democratic Party of Kosovo, at the moment indicted for war crimes. That started intra Albanian infighting between Thaci and Ramush Haradinaj[7], then PM of “Kosovo”, president of Alliance for the future of Kosovo, also indicted war criminal that was released from Hague due to lack of witnesses against him (more then 20 of them killed by unidentified executioners). That turmoil was also evident between EU and US making rift in, until then, unified front against Serbia. Another rift between Albanian political parties on Kosovo just surfaced, few days ago, when parliament in Pristina rejected proposed legislation which was intended to enshrine in law support for the Kosovo Liberation Army’s wartime values[8]. For the first time we have civilian political parties having majority in voting over ex- KLA veteran political parties. It is fair to expect that these infightings will serve confronting EU and US interests so at the end of the day Serbia also might have some benefit from it?
What is on the table for negotiation?
SERBIA WILL NEVER RECOGNISE KOSOVO!
It is clear from election in 2000 of the first government of Serbia (after demise of Milosevic) that no prime minister or president of Serbia was willing to sign declaration of independence for Kosovo! Even the most West leaning ruling parties declined to do it. Especially from 2012 until today, ruling party SNS and its supportive media persistently fueled public opinion that there is no way to recognize independence Kosovo! Even that there will be referendum that will decide instead of politicians. No compromise on Kosovo issue is presented every day in many newspapers, TV and radio stations inclining toward ruling party! Today, public outcry would be much louder then in 2012 in case of independence of Kosovo!
SERBIA WILL RECOGNIZE KOSOVO!
It is clear that Serbia is ready to recognize Kosovo but not what is considered Kosovo today, not its territory, nor its independence! Serbia’s political elite knows that it was wrong to incorporate the whole territory of Kosovo (today when speaking of Kosovo it includes two regions Kosovo and Metohija for simplicity) into Serbia in 1912! Unlike Metohija, Kosovo had parts without single Serb and for many years Serbia did not enter its, these de facto, territories![9]
In the last 20 years there were several suggested models for resolution of this conflict:
1. Nebojša Čović , Serbian vice PM, proposed in 2001 that two entities, a Serbian and an Albanian, be established on Kosovo and Metohija. The Serbian entity would be under the protection of the Yugoslav Army and police, while the Albanian entity would have the highest grade of autonomy and stay under the protection of international powers.
2. In 2002, Serbian PM Zoran Đinđić stated that “Serbia has neither the mechanism nor the resources to reintegrate Kosovo into its legal system, or to create a form in which it will be under its sovereignty. The division of the province, therefore, is nothing else than an attempt to rescue what can still be saved.”[10]
3. It seems that in 2008 Slobodan Samardžić, Minister for Kosovo and Metohija, proposed partitioning Kosovo along ethnic lines, asking the UN to ensure that Belgrade can control key institutions and functions in areas where Serbs form a majority[11]. Existence of such proposal was strongly denied by then Serbian government.
4. In 2011 and in 2014, Serbian Interior Minister Ivica Dačić proposed the partition of Kosovo as a solution to the Kosovo dispute.[12]
5. Hashim Thaci, president of “Kosovo” was eager for swap of territories with Serbia – taking south part of Serbia in exchange of northern Serbian enclave in Kosovo[13]
6. Special US envoy for Kosovo, Richard Grenel, dropped Molotov cocktail in June 2020 announcing plans “to create a “little mini-Shenzhen zone” between Kosovo-Serbia”![14] It was immediately dismissed by experts and international community, making laughing stock of illiterate Americano who actually meant mini Schengen!? Grenel never corrected himself and Vučić, in above mention reaction, that he ” expected talks on economic normalization not negotiation…” maybe confirms accuracy of Grenel statement?
Economic model of Shenzhen zone for Kosovo is the only viable option for this criminally infested region! Only rapid and from outside directed economic reconstruction gives hope for better future to young generations of local Albanians. Of course, it is difficult to see how part of political elite with background in drug and human organ trafficking could have any say in such process. For that reason it is of great importance recent distancing in Pristina parliament from KLA veterans and its past. It is time for clean start with new people!
But economic model must be followed by political one that will appease political aspirations of political elites of Pristina but also take in account political limitations of their political colleagues in Belgrade. Maybe this is where, otherwise unproductive, EU mandarins could come onboard with a modified
Cyprus model – despite joining the EU as a de facto divided island, the whole of Cyprus is EU territory. Turkish Cypriots who have, or are eligible for, EU travel documents are EU citizens. EU law is suspended in areas where the Cypriot government (Government of the Republic) does not exercise effective control. Cyprus has two official languages: Greek and Turkish; only Greek is an official EU language. [15]
That offer on the table, as one of the (best) possible scenarios is an offer to Serbia for quick accession to EU together with Kosovo. Kosovo will have own state that will through Serbia be part of EU and their citizens will enjoy all privileges of other EU citizens. From black hole it will be place for booming economic development. Albanian side in Pristina was reminded who rules in Kosovo when US/Turkish solders invited and patrolled together with Serbian gendarmerie. Despite their protests, KFOR (mostly NATO) announced that such event was in accordance with UN 1244 resolution (that affirms Serbian sovereignty over Kosovo) and Kumanovo agreement with Serbian government (that Serbia has right to send up to 1000 soldiers to Kosovo)!!!
Of course, all experiences so far tells us that it is rational to expect irrational outcome and that we might go back to partition table of Kosovo! Serbian negotiation party will have eyes wide open on outcome of election in Montenegro on 30th of August! That outcome will be closely related with territories that Belgrade will demand. Bear in mind that Vučić, so far, although mentioned border correction, never said that Serbia wants (only) Serbian enclave in the North of Kosovo. Other eye and hand will embrace Republika Srpska without any doubt. Serbian public is prepared for such outcome as well. White house meeting has all potentials for great resolve but then again seeing faces of Lavrov and Vučić in June…
Mavro Orbini
Share this: Like this: Like Loading… Related
Filed under: Russia, Serbia, USA | Tagged: Albania, Cyprus, Kosovo, Lavrov, Trump |


jewworldorder--2020-08-18--I Was a Teacher. Here’s How Your KIds Are Indoctrinated by Leftist Ideas.

Your children are being indoctrinated .
The education system designed to teach them how to think critically has been weaponized @ @ @ @ @ push an anti-American agenda .
As someone who has worked in education for four years @ @ @ @ @ how your children are being ensnared by the left and their teachers .
I worked @ @ @ @ @ to 13 and saw the brainwashing that exists at all levels of education .
The @ @ @ @ @ propaganda and suppression to push kids into the ensnaring grip of socialism and anti-patriotism .
@ @ @ @ @ Teachers will assign work instilling the idea that…

Your children are being indoctrinated. The education system designed to teach them how to think critically has been weaponized by the radical left to push an anti-American agenda.
As someone who has worked in education for four years, I have seen firsthand how your children are being ensnared by the left and their teachers.
I worked with kids from ages 3 to 13 and saw the brainwashing that exists at all levels of education. The left uses a combination of propaganda and suppression to push kids into the ensnaring grip of socialism and anti-patriotism.
First is the propaganda. Teachers will assign work instilling the idea that…


jewworldorder--2020-08-18--Community-Based Farms Rise to the Occasion as Big Food Supply Chains Stall

Community-Based Farms Rise to the Occasion as Big Food Supply Chains Stall You can skip to the end and leave @ @ @ @ @ currently not allowed .

Community-Based Farms Rise to the Occasion as Big Food Supply Chains Stall
Share this: Like this: Like Loading…
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.


Internet Trolls

The National Union of Israeli Students ( NUIS ) has become a full-time partner in the Israeli government ’ s efforts to spread its propaganda online and on college campuses around the world .
NUIS has launched a program to pay Israeli university students $ 2,000 to spread pro-Israel propaganda online for 5 hours per week from the “ comfort of home.
” The union is also partnering with Israel ’ s Jewish Agency to send Israeli students as missionaries to spread propaganda in other countries , for which they will also receive a stipend .
This active recruitment of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s orchestrated effort to suppress the Palestinian solidarity movement under the guise of combating “ delegitimization ” of Israel and anti-Semitism .
The involvement of the official Israeli student union as well as Haifa University , Tel Aviv University , Ben-Gurion University and Sapir College in these state propaganda programs will likely bolster Palestinian calls for the international boycott of Israeli academic institutions .
That is one of the exhortations in a Hebrew document issued by NUIS , and translated by The Electronic Intifada , inviting Israeli students to apply for a program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The project seeks to take advantage of the fact that “ Many students in Israel master the Internet and are proficient at using the Internet and social networking and various sites and are required to write and express themselves in English.
” The paid scholarship will allow them to get training and then work from home for five hours per week for a year to “ refute ” what it calls “ misinformation ” about Israel on social networking sites .
Among the stated goals of the scholarships is “ to deepen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the State of Israel.
” The document explains : Work from the “ comfort of home ” What is completely missing from the program is any indication that criticism of Israel could be valid .
Rather the National Union of Israeli Students apparently seeks to indoctrinate Israeli students that every criticism of Israel is “ hate ” and “ anti-Semitism ” and that the Internet should be seen as a battlefield on which they are foot soldiers .
An interesting aspect of the NUIS program is that it uses the common open source @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with program participants .
This interface can be found at students.digitalchange.co.il .
Whereas Moodle was designed for education – to spread mind-opening learning beyond the constraints of geography – the Israeli innovation here is to use it for mind-narrowing propaganda : getting students to be uncritical , to not think for themselves , but rather to spread Israel ’ s state-sponsored propaganda .
See the world , spread more propaganda NUIS has also partnered with the Jewish Agency , the Israeli state body that encourages Jews from around the world to settle on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on college campuses around the world .
The Jewish Agency website announces , as translated from Hebrew by Dena Shunra for The Electronic Intifada : Training for these overseas missions for successful applicants will take place at Haifa University , Tel Aviv University , Ben-Gurion University and Sapir College , after which the would-be missionaries “ will set off for a one-year mission in the various Jewish communities around the world , and will also receive a scholarship of up to NIS 5,000 [ $ 1300 ] .
” Applications are open to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country for three years , those who have completed service in the Israeli army , and those who speak foreign languages , among other criteria .
A student union in the service of the state In most countries student unions often find themselves at odds with state authorities , fighting for the rights of students .
But it would appear that Israel ’ s “ student union ” does not so much represent students and fight for their rights , but represents the state in the state ’ s efforts to recruit students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this sense , the NUIS functions in a very similar way to Israel ’ s “ trade union ” the Histadrut .
Who funds NUIS and what role do they play in government propaganda efforts ?
See : Israel ’ s “ pretty face ” : How National Union of Israeli Students does government ’ s propaganda dirty work Translation : Students in the Struggle against Anti-Semitism on the Internet Students in the Struggle against Anti-Semitism on the Internet The National Union of Israeli Students [ NUIS ] unites about 300,000 students from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the goals and objectives of students , guards the status of students and impacts the public agenda in all aspects from the perspective that the future generation should be a full partner in shaping the Israeli reality of tomorrow .
For young people the Internet is first of all a tool for work and study .
Many students in Israel master the Internet and are proficient at using the Internet and social networking and various sites and are required to write and express themselves in English .
Like other web users , students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and hatred of Jews on the Internet .
In recent years use of the Internet for work , finding information and leisure has become accepted and common all over the world .
Alongside the development of the Internet and its use , websites have developed that disseminate anti-Semitic and false information that one could not find a publisher [ for ] in the pre-Internet age .
The Internet allows uncontrolled access to content from marginal groups and therefore can influence many audiences who are exposed to such information , particularly young people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then , is used as a major tool for the dissemination of anti-Semitism , hatred of Israel and of Jews and thus the Internet is also the place to battle against such sites , pull the ground from under them and to provide reliable and balanced information .
In the present reality , in which the Internet has become a key tool in spreading anti-Semitism , and given that most students use this medium , it is requested that Israeli students will be the ones to lead the battle against hostile websites @ @ @ @ @ @ @ students to map the anti-Semitic websites and to deal with what is said on them .
During the project students can work on social networks to refute misinformation comprehensively available throughout this medium .
• This is our opportunity , as Israeli students , to provide hasbara [ state propaganda ] that is correct and balanced , to help in the struggle against the delegitimization of the State of Israel and against hatred of Jews in the world .
• To deal with , struggle [ against ] and reduce dissemination of anti-Semitism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and expand hasbara activities of students in the State of Israel ; • To increase the awareness and involvement of the National Union of Israeli Students , local student associations , and students in general about what is happening in the world concerning Jews and the status of Israel .
After training , the student will begin his activities .
The student will do the activities in the comfort of his home , where every week he will be obligated to about 5 hours of activities for a period of one calendar year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be paid a total of NIS 7,500 [ $ 2,000 ] to perform the tasks of the project , at least 5 hours weekly for a total of 240 hours of activities under the project umbrella .
The scholarship will be given to the student at three periods ; in April , in August at the NUIS scholarship award ceremony , and in November .
Students will be admitted into the project only if they are members of student union at their institution of higher learning , provided such institution is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the NUIS website www.nuis.co.il at the scholarships page .
A scholarship which is a mission – the Jewish Agency and Student Union For the first time in Israel – a unique , world-encompassing scholarship , in cooperation between the Student Union and the Jewish Agency .
Every year the Jewish Agency of Israel sends approximately 150 emissaries to various places around the world – North America , England , South Africa , Australia , Germany , Italy and South America , who engage in Jewish education and hasbara in three main streams @ @ @ @ @ @ @ North America ) , community emissaries and youth movement emissaries .
The scholarship introduces program participants with content relevant to the position , in a 12-meeting course , which is held every other weeks and deals with various issues : • Tikkun Olam [ the religious obligation to repair the world – or make it better ] • History of the Nation of Israel in modern times The course is experiential and includes lectures from the very best lecturers in the country , an active and reflective workshop , an educational experience of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a variety of different topics .
In August 2012 , course graduates will set off for a one-year mission in the various Jewish communities around the world , and will also receive a scholarship of up to NIS 5,000 .
The course will be held in four regional centers : • Students in their last years of study for an academic degree ; • Holding Israeli citizenship and having lived in Israel for at least 3 years .
• With good command of English/Russian/Spanish/French/Portuguese/or other languages .
• Having experience as camp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to speak publicly .
• Having an affinity to Judaism and the Israeli culture and familiarity with Diaspora Jewry .
Admittance to the program is conditional upon passing the screening process , which will be held in November-December 2011 at the various campuses .
Applications can be filed here : [ http : //shlichut.org.il/ ?
yI3AokS1 ] For further information , call Karen at 02-6216233

The National Union of Israeli Students (NUIS) has become a full-time partner in the Israeli government’s efforts to spread its propaganda online and on college campuses around the world.
NUIS has launched a program to pay Israeli university students $2,000 to spread pro-Israel propaganda online for 5 hours per week from the “comfort of home.”
The union is also partnering with Israel’s Jewish Agency to send Israeli students as missionaries to spread propaganda in other countries, for which they will also receive a stipend.
This active recruitment of Israeli students is part of Israel’s orchestrated effort to suppress the Palestinian solidarity movement under the guise of combating “delegitimization” of Israel and anti-Semitism.
The involvement of the official Israeli student union as well as Haifa University, Tel Aviv University, Ben-Gurion University and Sapir College in these state propaganda programs will likely bolster Palestinian calls for the international boycott of Israeli academic institutions.
Paying students to spread Israeli propaganda online
This is our opportunity, as Israeli students, to provide hasbara [state propaganda] that is correct and balanced, to help in the struggle against the delegitimization of the State of Israel and against hatred of Jews in the world.
That is one of the exhortations in a Hebrew document issued by NUIS, and translated by The Electronic Intifada, inviting Israeli students to apply for a program to help spread Israel’s message.
The project seeks to take advantage of the fact that “Many students in Israel master the Internet and are proficient at using the Internet and social networking and various sites and are required to write and express themselves in English.”
The paid scholarship will allow them to get training and then work from home for five hours per week for a year to “refute” what it calls “misinformation” about Israel on social networking sites.
Among the stated goals of the scholarships is “to deepen and expand hasbara activities of students in the State of Israel.” The document explains:
The Internet allows uncontrolled access to content from marginal groups and therefore can influence many audiences who are exposed to such information, particularly young people who are more easily influenced. The Internet, then, is used as a major tool for the dissemination of anti-Semitism, hatred of Israel and of Jews and thus the Internet is also the place to battle against such sites, pull the ground from under them and to provide reliable and balanced information.
Work from the “comfort of home”
The NUIS program document explains:
After training, the student will begin his activities. The student will do the activities in the comfort of his home, where every week he will be obligated to about 5 hours of activities for a period of one calendar year (not academic year). Students will be paid a total of NIS 7,500 [$2,000] to perform the tasks of the project, at least 5 hours weekly for a total of 240 hours of activities under the project umbrella.
What is completely missing from the program is any indication that criticism of Israel could be valid. Rather the National Union of Israeli Students apparently seeks to indoctrinate Israeli students that every criticism of Israel is “hate” and “anti-Semitism” and that the Internet should be seen as a battlefield on which they are foot soldiers.
Using e-learning tools for government propaganda
An interesting aspect of the NUIS program is that it uses the common open source virtual learning environment Moodle as its interface with program participants. This interface can be found at students.digitalchange.co.il.
Whereas Moodle was designed for education – to spread mind-opening learning beyond the constraints of geography – the Israeli innovation here is to use it for mind-narrowing propaganda: getting students to be uncritical, to not think for themselves, but rather to spread Israel’s state-sponsored propaganda.
See the world, spread more propaganda
NUIS has also partnered with the Jewish Agency, the Israeli state body that encourages Jews from around the world to settle on stolen Palestinian land, to spread propaganda on college campuses around the world.
The Jewish Agency website announces, as translated from Hebrew by Dena Shunra for The Electronic Intifada:
For the first time in Israel – a unique, world-encompassing scholarship, in cooperation between the Student Union and the Jewish Agency. Every year the Jewish Agency of Israel sends approximately 150 emissaries to various places around the world – North America, England, South Africa, Australia, Germany, Italy and South America, who engage in Jewish education and hasbara in three main streams – Hillel emissaries (to campuses around North America), community emissaries and youth movement emissaries.
Training for these overseas missions for successful applicants will take place at Haifa University, Tel Aviv University, Ben-Gurion University and Sapir College, after which the would-be missionaries “will set off for a one-year mission in the various Jewish communities around the world, and will also receive a scholarship of up to NIS 5,000 [$1300].”
Applications are open to Israeli citizens who have lived in the country for three years, those who have completed service in the Israeli army, and those who speak foreign languages, among other criteria.
A student union in the service of the state
In most countries student unions often find themselves at odds with state authorities, fighting for the rights of students. But it would appear that Israel’s “student union” does not so much represent students and fight for their rights, but represents the state in the state’s efforts to recruit students to do its political bidding.
In this sense, the NUIS functions in a very similar way to Israel’s “trade union” the Histadrut.
Who funds NUIS and what role do they play in government propaganda efforts?
See: Israel’s “pretty face”: How National Union of Israeli Students does government’s propaganda dirty work
Translation: Students in the Struggle against Anti-Semitism on the Internet
National Union of Israeli Students
Students in the Struggle against Anti-Semitism on the Internet
Vision and background:
The National Union of Israeli Students [NUIS] unites about 300,000 students from all over the country. NUIS promotes the goals and objectives of students, guards the status of students and impacts the public agenda in all aspects from the perspective that the future generation should be a full partner in shaping the Israeli reality of tomorrow.
For young people the Internet is first of all a tool for work and study. Many students in Israel master the Internet and are proficient at using the Internet and social networking and various sites and are required to write and express themselves in English. Like other web users, students encounter anti-Semitic websites disseminating hatred of Israel and hatred of Jews on the Internet.
In recent years use of the Internet for work, finding information and leisure has become accepted and common all over the world. Alongside the development of the Internet and its use, websites have developed that disseminate anti-Semitic and false information that one could not find a publisher [for] in the pre-Internet age.
The Internet allows uncontrolled access to content from marginal groups and therefore can influence many audiences who are exposed to such information, particularly young people who are more easily influenced.
The Internet, then, is used as a major tool for the dissemination of anti-Semitism, hatred of Israel and of Jews and thus the Internet is also the place to battle against such sites, pull the ground from under them and to provide reliable and balanced information.
In the present reality, in which the Internet has become a key tool in spreading anti-Semitism, and given that most students use this medium, it is requested that Israeli students will be the ones to lead the battle against hostile websites.
The following proposed scholarships will allow students to map the anti-Semitic websites and to deal with what is said on them. During the project students can work on social networks to refute misinformation comprehensively available throughout this medium.
This is our opportunity, as Israeli students, to provide hasbara [state propaganda] that is correct and balanced, to help in the struggle against the delegitimization of the State of Israel and against hatred of Jews in the world.
Project goals
To deal with, struggle [against] and reduce dissemination of anti-Semitism on the Internet; To deepen and expand hasbara activities of students in the State of Israel; To increase the awareness and involvement of the National Union of Israeli Students, local student associations, and students in general about what is happening in the world concerning Jews and the status of Israel.
Student activities
After training, the student will begin his activities. The student will do the activities in the comfort of his home, where every week he will be obligated to about 5 hours of activities for a period of one calendar year (not academic year). Students will be paid a total of NIS 7,500 [$2,000] to perform the tasks of the project, at least 5 hours weekly for a total of 240 hours of activities under the project umbrella.
The scholarship will be given to the student at three periods; in April, in August at the NUIS scholarship award ceremony, and in November.
Students will be admitted into the project only if they are members of student union at their institution of higher learning, provided such institution is a member of NUIS. Applications are made through the NUIS website www.nuis.co.il at the scholarships page.
Translation: Student Union and Jewish Agency scholarship
Shacham Scholarship – Jewish Agency and Student Union
A scholarship which is a mission – the Jewish Agency and Student Union
Shacham – Mission, Education, Action
For the first time in Israel – a unique, world-encompassing scholarship, in cooperation between the Student Union and the Jewish Agency.
Every year the Jewish Agency of Israel sends approximately 150 emissaries to various places around the world – North America, England, South Africa, Australia, Germany, Italy and South America, who engage in Jewish education and hasbara in three main streams – Hillel emissaries (to campuses around North America), community emissaries and youth movement emissaries.
The scholarship introduces program participants with content relevant to the position, in a 12-meeting course, which is held every other weeks and deals with various issues:
Jewish identity
Israeli society
Tikkun Olam [the religious obligation to repair the world – or make it better]
Hasbara skills
History of the Nation of Israel in modern times
and more…
The course is experiential and includes lectures from the very best lecturers in the country, an active and reflective workshop, an educational experience of collaboration and coping both intellectually and emotionally with a variety of different topics. In August 2012, course graduates will set off for a one-year mission in the various Jewish communities around the world, and will also receive a scholarship of up to NIS 5,000.
The course will be held in four regional centers:
South: Sapir College/Ben Gurion [University]
Center: Tel Aviv University
Jerusalem: the Hebrew University
North: the Haifa University.
Eligibility for application:
Students in their last years of study for an academic degree;
Holding Israeli citizenship and having lived in Israel for at least 3 years.
Having completed military or national service.
With good command of English/Russian/Spanish/French/Portuguese/or other languages.
Having experience as camp counselors, teachers, and the ability to speak publicly.
Having an affinity to Judaism and the Israeli culture and familiarity with Diaspora Jewry.
Admittance to the program is conditional upon passing the screening process, which will be held in November-December 2011 at the various campuses.
Applications can be filed here: [http://shlichut.org.il/?yI3AokS1]
For further information, call Karen at 02-6216233


jewworldorder--2020-08-19--How To Make a Judge Run Out Of The Court Room

How To Make a Judge Run Out Of The Court Room You can skip to the end and leave a @ @ @ @ @ not allowed .

How To Make a Judge Run Out Of The Court Room
How To Make a Judge Run Out Of The Court Room
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.


jewworldorder--2020-08-19--Lindy Chamberlain the Satanic Sacrifice

Lindy Chamberlain the Satanic Sacrifice

Was Azaria Chamberlain ( ‘ A Dingo Ate My Baby ’ ) RITUALLY SACRAFICED by Marina Abramovic and Ulay ?
@ @ @ @ @ ever recovered .
Clothes recovered 3 years later after Lindy exhausted her appeals and was @ @ @ @ @ JAIL – Clothes HAD NO DINGO DNA or SALIVA .
Lindy was found guilty of @ @ @ @ @ , but then the missing baby clothes show up in the open , on the @ @ @ @ @ SALIVA or DNA present ?
?

Lindy Chamberlain the Satanic Sacrifice
Was Azaria Chamberlain (‘A Dingo Ate My Baby’) RITUALLY SACRAFICED by Marina Abramovic and Ulay? No Body or skull was ever recovered.
Clothes recovered 3 years later after Lindy exhausted her appeals and was going to do LIFE IN JAIL – Clothes HAD NO DINGO DNA or SALIVA.
Lindy was found guilty of murder, exhausted all appeals, but then the missing baby clothes show up in the open, on the ground, with NO DINGO SALIVA or DNA present??
A DINGO ATE MY BABY!! Marina Abramovic vs Lindy Chamberlain


jewworldorder--2020-08-19--Australia’s biggest tax cheats

Australia’s biggest tax cheats

While the Australian Tax Office does very little to make Australia ’ s biggest company tax dodgers pay their fair @ @ @ @ @ the process of spending $ millions trying to jail ATO whistleblower Richard Boyle .
When @ @ @ @ @ s not hard to work out why the rich get richer and the poor get @ @ @ @ @ Jews do not play by the same rules as us .

Australia’s biggest tax cheats and the ATO
While the Australian Tax Office does very little to make Australia’s biggest company tax dodgers pay their fair share the ATO is in the process of spending $millions trying to jail ATO whistleblower Richard Boyle. When looked at closely it’s not hard to work out why the rich get richer and the poor get the picture.
Obviously the Jews do not play by the same rules as us.
An Example:
No 1: ExxonMobil Australia Pty Ltd – 4 year total income – $33,170,960,652 – Tax $0
No 2: EnergyAustralia – 4 year total income – $30,229,662,288 – Tax $0
No 3: Virgin Australia – 4 year total income – $17,907,315,984 – Tax $0
(Click here to see the full list of 40 on the right hand side of the page)
READ More:


jewworldorder--2020-08-19--Australian Jewish Woman Faces 74 Charges of Sexual Abuse

You can skip to the end and leave a response .
Pinging is currently not allowed .

Australian Jewish Woman Faces 74 Charges of Sexual Abuse
Australian Jewish Woman Faces 74 Charges of Sexual Abuse
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.