jewworldorder--2020-08-15--Would Rudolf Steiner be a Vučić troll?

Would Rudolf Steiner be a Vučić troll?

By Saker´s Johnny-on-the-spot in Belgrade for The Saker Blog I doubt it .
But it was good of Zoran to take time off his busy schedule to comment on my reporting from Belgrade .
I am sorry that my dispatches fall short of Australian journalistic standards .
Serbian political language is probably more robust than anything that Zoran experienced down under .
I suspect that returning to Serbia must have been quite a culture shock .
I can not imagine that in Australia it would occur to anyone to refer to the Queen and her dysfunctional family in the robust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Vučić .
There are , nevertheless , equally piquant descriptors that could be applied to some of the British royals who have been in the news lately .
Some of the same attributes would also fit Vučić quite nicely .
Zoran is upset by the epithets that I use .
There is visual evidence that Vučić is keenly aware of the disrepute in which he is generally held and of the trashy nicknames that , long before me , the Serbian people pinned on him : He does not seem to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he puts up a brave front and pretends not to be .
If Vučić says he is OK with it , why should it perturb Zoran so much ?
My descriptions of Vučić as a “ tyrant ” and “ psychopath ” are not complimentary but more relevantly I would suggest that they are accurate , just as it would be completely accurate , for example , to describe Prince Andrew as a pervert .
In Black ’ s Law Dictionary , the term “ tyrant ” is defined thus : “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legitimate or otherwise , who violates the constitution to act arbitrarily contrary to justice ” .
The Cambridge dictionary defines “ tyrant ” as “ a ruler who has unlimited power over other people , and uses it unfairly and cruelly , ” a definition that is essentially identical .
This is a precise description of Serbia ’ s form of government under Vučić .
As President , formally he has limited and largely ceremonial powers , not unlike the President of Switzerland or the Queen of England ( and Australia ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ who makes all important decisions in the country and micro-manages everything , as every person in Serbia who is not on cannabis is perfectly aware .
To judge whether he perceives himself within the constitutional framework , watch his own ludicrous boasting of the things he has supposedly done which , whether actually done or not , constitutionally do not pertain at all to the office of the President : More seriously , as everyone living in Serbia knows , major government institutions are empty shells , ministers , judges , and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they sit at his pleasure , and do not make independent decisions .
Arbitrary , personal rule is the salient feature of Serbia ’ s political system under Vučić .
I submit that saying so publicly , far from being an insult or in bad taste , is simply a true statement within the legal and political definition of the term “ tyrant , ” as I use it .
Nobody in Serbia today would seriously challenge that , not even trolls , in private at least .
As for my other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a “ psychopath , ” the impression that Vučić has serious mental health issues is widespread in Serbia .
But I do not make that assertion lightly .
As a layman , I defer to the diagnosis put forward by a competent professional , Prof. Mila Alečković , who has a doctorate in clinical psychology from the Sorbonne and has taught and practiced in France for many years .
In her considered professional judgment , without reference to what the common people might be whispering in the cafes , Alexander Vučić is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a watch at what Prof. Alečković has to say on the subject : The utility of Prof. Alečković ’ s exceedingly well-argued presentation is that even in layman ’ s terms it provides reasonable grounds to conclude that both of the descriptions of Vučić that Zoran objects to , not just that of “ psychopath , ” but based on the visual evidence that she provides also “ tyrant , ” are accurate .
If so , that is very bad news indeed for the country that such an individual happens to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other than regard for good journalistic practices , not much else seems to have rubbed off on Zoran in Australia .
One of the things he might have learned there is to support the right of citizens to present their grievances and to voice their views publicly without getting their heads smashed .
Minimizing the number of protesters and denigrating their concerns is a rather disingenuous strategy of avoidance to express human solidarity , even with those whose views we may not share .
I wonder how Zoran would have reacted in Germany @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who were members of the White Rose Society and of what they had done .
Would he have dismissed them as insignificant because they were just a handful ?
In retrospect , who does he think was morally superior and ultimately victorious in that controversy , the outnumbered students or the regime they were protesting against ?
He should give the matter some deep thought for his own sake now that he is back in Serbia , as he observes the dominant trends .
It is always useful to repeat Pastor Bonhoeffer ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fence-sitter who refuses to speak up when morally he ought to .
After silently watching those he wanted nothing to do with being taken away , when his turn comes will anyone be left to stand up in his defense ?
I sympathise with commentators who are so defensive about their country that they confuse it with the ruling regime , though it is bringing ruin upon the country they cherish .
Saint Paul speaks in the Gospel of that sort of phenomenon as “ zeal not according to reason.
” But no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criticism to which one ’ s country is properly entitled .

By Saker´s Johnny-on-the-spot in Belgrade for The Saker Blog
Would Rudolf Steiner be a Vučić troll?
I doubt it. But it was good of Zoran to take time off his busy schedule to comment on my reporting from Belgrade. I am sorry that my dispatches fall short of Australian journalistic standards. Serbian political language is probably more robust than anything that Zoran experienced down under. I suspect that returning to Serbia must have been quite a culture shock. I cannot imagine that in Australia it would occur to anyone to refer to the Queen and her dysfunctional family in the robust terms that I routinely employ with reference to Vučić. There are, nevertheless, equally piquant descriptors that could be applied to some of the British royals who have been in the news lately. Some of the same attributes would also fit Vučić quite nicely.
Zoran is upset by the epithets that I use. There is visual evidence that Vučić is keenly aware of the disrepute in which he is generally held and of the trashy nicknames that, long before me, the Serbian people pinned on him:
[embedded content]
He does not seem to be bothered by it, or at least he puts up a brave front and pretends not to be. If Vučić says he is OK with it, why should it perturb Zoran so much?
My descriptions of Vučić as a “tyrant” and “psychopath” are not complimentary but more relevantly I would suggest that they are accurate, just as it would be completely accurate, for example, to describe Prince Andrew as a pervert. In Black’s Law Dictionary, the term “tyrant” is defined thus: “The chief magistrate of the state, whether legitimate or otherwise, who violates the constitution to act arbitrarily contrary to justice”. The Cambridge dictionary defines “tyrant” as “a ruler who has unlimited power over other people, and uses it unfairly and cruelly,” a definition that is essentially identical. This is a precise description of Serbia’s form of government under Vučić. As President, formally he has limited and largely ceremonial powers, not unlike the President of Switzerland or the Queen of England (and Australia). However, it is he in fact who makes all important decisions in the country and micro-manages everything, as every person in Serbia who is not on cannabis is perfectly aware. To judge whether he perceives himself within the constitutional framework, watch his own ludicrous boasting of the things he has supposedly done which, whether actually done or not, constitutionally do not pertain at all to the office of the President:
[embedded content]
More seriously, as everyone living in Serbia knows, major government institutions are empty shells, ministers, judges, and other officials are his puppets and party appointees, they sit at his pleasure, and do not make independent decisions. Arbitrary, personal rule is the salient feature of Serbia’s political system under Vučić. I submit that saying so publicly, far from being an insult or in bad taste, is simply a true statement within the legal and political definition of the term “tyrant,” as I use it. Nobody in Serbia today would seriously challenge that, not even trolls, in private at least.
As for my other uncomplimentary description of Vučić, that he is a “psychopath,” the impression that Vučić has serious mental health issues is widespread in Serbia. But I do not make that assertion lightly. As a layman, I defer to the diagnosis put forward by a competent professional, Prof. Mila Alečković, who has a doctorate in clinical psychology from the Sorbonne and has taught and practiced in France for many years. In her considered professional judgment, without reference to what the common people might be whispering in the cafes, Alexander Vučić is in fact a psychopathic personality. Take a watch at what Prof. Alečković has to say on the subject:
[embedded content]
The utility of Prof. Alečković’s exceedingly well-argued presentation is that even in layman’s terms it provides reasonable grounds to conclude that both of the descriptions of Vučić that Zoran objects to, not just that of “psychopath,” but based on the visual evidence that she provides also “tyrant,” are accurate. If so, that is very bad news indeed for the country that such an individual happens to be running.
It is a pity that other than regard for good journalistic practices, not much else seems to have rubbed off on Zoran in Australia. One of the things he might have learned there is to support the right of citizens to present their grievances and to voice their views publicly without getting their heads smashed. Minimizing the number of protesters and denigrating their concerns is a rather disingenuous strategy of avoidance to express human solidarity, even with those whose views we may not share. I wonder how Zoran would have reacted in Germany in 1942 if told of the students who were members of the White Rose Society and of what they had done. Would he have dismissed them as insignificant because they were just a handful? In retrospect, who does he think was morally superior and ultimately victorious in that controversy, the outnumbered students or the regime they were protesting against?
He should give the matter some deep thought for his own sake now that he is back in Serbia, as he observes the dominant trends. It is always useful to repeat Pastor Bonhoeffer’s admonition concerning the fate of the fence-sitter who refuses to speak up when morally he ought to. After silently watching those he wanted nothing to do with being taken away, when his turn comes will anyone be left to stand up in his defense?
I sympathise with commentators who are so defensive about their country that they confuse it with the ruling regime, though it is bringing ruin upon the country they cherish. Saint Paul speaks in the Gospel of that sort of phenomenon as “zeal not according to reason.” But no government should ever enjoy the immunity from criticism to which one’s country is properly entitled.
Share this: Like this: Like Loading… Related
Filed under: Australia, Dictatorship, Serbia |


jewworldorder--2020-08-15--UN launches $565 million appeal for blast-hit Lebanon

UNITED NATIONS — The United Nations launched an appeal Friday to raise $ 565 million to help Lebanon recover from this month ’ s devastating port blast that killed 171 people .
The UN said in a statement that the funds would be used to support Lebanon as it moves from immediate life-saving humanitarian relief towards rebuilding its shattered economy .
“ The task of rebuilding people ’ s lives and recovering from the devastation is only just beginning , ” said Najat Rochdi , a UN humanitarian coordinator for Lebanon .
Get The Times of Israel ’ s Daily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ top stories Free Sign Up “ I urge the international community to demonstrate their steadfast commitment to the people of Lebanon and repay in turn Lebanon ’ s incredible generosity to Syrian and Palestine refugees with full financial support for this appeal , ” she added .
The August 4 explosion flattened surrounding neighborhoods , leaving thousands homeless , damaged dozens of hospitals and clinics and destroyed more than 100 schools .
It also wounded at least 6,500 residents .
The explosion was caused by a huge stock of hazardous materials stored in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on state corruption .
It came as Lebanon reels from an economic crisis , with runaway inflation and bank capital controls fueling poverty , despair and angry street protests .
The cabinet resigned this week amid fury over the devastating blast .
Western powers have pressed Lebanon ’ s leaders for deep changes and a government that reflects the will of the people , and also insisted reforms be implemented to unlock billions of dollars in international aid .
The UN said its appeal money would target improving food security , help the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provide cash for shelter for families whose homes were rendered uninhabitable .

UNITED NATIONS — The United Nations launched an appeal Friday to raise $565 million to help Lebanon recover from this month’s devastating port blast that killed 171 people.
The UN said in a statement that the funds would be used to support Lebanon as it moves from immediate life-saving humanitarian relief towards rebuilding its shattered economy.
“The task of rebuilding people’s lives and recovering from the devastation is only just beginning,” said Najat Rochdi, a UN humanitarian coordinator for Lebanon.
Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Free Sign Up
“I urge the international community to demonstrate their steadfast commitment to the people of Lebanon and repay in turn Lebanon’s incredible generosity to Syrian and Palestine refugees with full financial support for this appeal,” she added.
This picture shows a view of Beirut’s port in the aftermath of a huge chemical explosion that disfigured the Lebanese capital, on August 14, 2020. (AFP)
The August 4 explosion flattened surrounding neighborhoods, leaving thousands homeless, damaged dozens of hospitals and clinics and destroyed more than 100 schools.
It also wounded at least 6,500 residents.
The explosion was caused by a huge stock of hazardous materials stored in a warehouse, and was widely blamed on state corruption.
It came as Lebanon reels from an economic crisis, with runaway inflation and bank capital controls fueling poverty, despair and angry street protests.
Anti-government protesters near the Lebanese parliament building, a week after the massive explosion in Beirut, Lebanon, August 11, 2020. (AP Photo/Felipe Dana)
The cabinet resigned this week amid fury over the devastating blast.
Western powers have pressed Lebanon’s leaders for deep changes and a government that reflects the will of the people, and also insisted reforms be implemented to unlock billions of dollars in international aid.
The UN said its appeal money would target improving food security, help the rebuilding of damaged hospitals and schools and provide cash for shelter for families whose homes were rendered uninhabitable.


jewworldorder--2020-08-15--China Newsbrief & Sitrep

China Newsbrief & Sitrep

By Godfree Roberts from his newsletter This week we focus mainly on China ’ s development and business .
We still see signs of an unrestricted and type of unformed war on China that is described by many names , examples cold war or , hybrid war .
The main characteristic of this war is where nothing that disrupts the enemy is off limits .
Despite an unprecedented downturn in US-China relations during a pandemic , US businesses are not leaving the China market .
This was a major finding of an annual survey of members released today by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a trade group representing more than 200 businesses , many of them global brands with decades of China experience .
Extracts from Here Comes China Excellent overview – How Did China Succeed ?
| Joseph E. Stiglitz on China ’ s Economic System Although Stiglitz is a world banker , he holds different views from the trademark , neoliberal Washington consensus , specifically an economic ideology holding that while people should own the value they produce themselves , economic value derived from land ( including all natural resources and natural opportunities ) should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
His wide overview here on the growth of China makes sense and is easy listening .
China ’ s central bank has taken the lead in digital currencies .
What does it mean for businesses ?
by Jemma Xu and Dan Prud ’ homme Outside China , digital currencies are fraught with incredible risk .
In this void , China ’ s Digital Currency Electronic Payments offers the public confidence unobtainable by private digital currencies .
DCEP is itself a stablecoin , but one backed 1:1 by the PBoC with fiat Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two layer ” approach .
First , and critically , because it is a sovereign digital currency , the PBoC is the only issuing party .
Second , to expeditiously diffuse the currency , the central bank issues DCEP to select retail banks and non-financial institutions ( e.g.
, Alibaba , Tencent , and Union Pay ) in China with strong pre-existing mobile payment networks , who then merely distribute the currency to the general public .
Businesses across China will be required by law to accept DCEP as payment .
Besides the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to become the world ’ s most widely used digital currency : • capabilities to quickly adapt to changing technological paradigms and institutions ; • a massive Chinese population who quickly adopts new digital technologies , and Although central banks in several other countries have also been studying digital currencies , none have taken the lead to actually develop and rollout a CBDC at the scale occurring in China .
DCEP will be used for purchases in all sectors across the country .
To start , as of mid-2020 , DCEP has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Chengdu , Suzhou and Xiong ’ an – potentially reaching over 42 million people , more than Canada ’ s entire population .
Elsewhere in China , DCEP is already in the process of being piloted in the restaurant and hospitality sectors , with foreign multinationals such as McDonald ’ s , Starbucks , and Subway already signing up to participate .
Further , DCEP trials are already being conducted around China to reimburse public sector employees ’ travel costs .
Yet other pilot initiatives , such as a commitment to use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Beijing , are in place .
Meanwhile , the Chinese government recently proposed the creation of a regional digital currency backed by the Chinese RMB/yuan , Japanese yen , South Korean won , and Hong Kong dollar – with DCEP at the centre .
And China ’ s multi-trillion dollar Belt and Road Initiative ( BRI ) offers a network to extend DCEP in countries around the globe .
Businesses should prepare for DCEP ’ s rollout in two main ways .
First , they must ensure that they have appropriate infrastructure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as digital wallets .
Contracts with third-party financial custodians can also be helpful .
On the upside , to facilitate swift legal compliance with DCEP – considering that its acceptance is being required by law in China – the Chinese authorities may integrate DCEP with popular existing digital wallets already widely used by many businesses in China , namely Alipay and Wechat Pay .
Second , businesses may need to explore interoperability options when conducting cross-border trade .
Such action may be needed in the longer term if DCEP leads to an alternative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system , which is a probable prospect .
Meanwhile , firms who timely prepare for China ’ s DCEP rollout can seize several significant opportunities .
First , as previously alluded to , the expansion of DCEP will facilitate the internationalisation of the yuan/renminbi .
In doing so , the Chinese currency will provide a strong alternative institution to rival the current USD-dominated international payments system .
Third , by facilitating direct transactions between digital wallets , DCEP will eliminate sizeable banking clearing and settlements costs .
In other words , ‘ payment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ separate clearing and settlement processes .
Fourth , DCEP will offer firms new ways of raising capital and secondary trading via the issuance of digital securities and disintermediated trading on exchanges .
Digital securities are regulated financial instruments such as equities or bonds where the transaction and shareholder details are recorded on the blockchain ledger .
As a stable currency , DCEP will be used to reduce or eliminate the clearing and settlement processes associated with trading digital securities on secondary exchanges .
In turn , this will provide firms and investors easier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , DCEP ’ s development will catalyse fintech innovation , giving rise to hybrid products that draw on both traditional markets and digital currencies .
Greater numbers of innovative structured products are appearing in the digital currencies market , where the underlying asset is a native digital currency , such as Bitcoin , but the payoffs are based on traditional structured products .
DCEP will serve as a reliable alternative underlying-asset in the future , stimulating the creation of more hybrid financial products .
Fifth , and not least , aggregate demand may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s rollout .
DCEP adoption will allow governments to rapidly deploy “ helicopter money ” to the public without requiring bank accounts .
This will empower the previously unbanked to form a new group of consumers .
[ MORE ] Debt – People criticizing China ’ s debt see only the debit side of the ledger .
If they look at the credit side , they would see offsetting assets .
One of those assets is the $ 20 billion Three Gorges Dam , which generates 100 billion KWh which it sells for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 8.4 billion every year .
Three Gorges tours earn another $ 3 billion , and flood mitigation and irrigation enhancement save another $ 3 billion , as the current flooding demonstrates .
That ’ s valuable debt !
China pledged to invest $ 5.8 billion in the construction of the Moscow-Kazan High Speed Railway .
The railway will be extended to China through Kazakhstan .
The total cost of the Moscow-Kazan high speed railroad project is $ 21.4 billion .
[ MORE ] The Caspian Sea is becoming an alternative to the Suez @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a great deal of activity is taking place there .
Four major Belt & Road routes and one significant Indian route make up the five East-West intersections that the Caspian is shortly to provide , with the potential for a sixth should plans to create a canal between the Caspian and Black Seas come to fruition .
[ Download Chris Devonshire-Ellis ’ Report ] The Port of Beirut poses the biggest geostrategic threat to American power projection because China ’ s Silk Road is fast creeping towards the docks at Beirut Port @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israel to cancel its Haifa rail contract with China , has dampened the Chinese advance in the eastern Mediterranean , and what remains now in the path of the US is the Beirut Port .
The US must either invade it to block the Chinese geostrategic mission creep , or else destroy it .
[ MORE ] See everyone next week for the regular Here Comes China newsletter .
It is a pleasure to work with Godfree and to collate the main points for The Saker Blog .

August 12, 2020
By Godfree Roberts from his newsletter
This week we focus mainly on China’s development and business.
We still see signs of an unrestricted and type of unformed war on China that is described by many names, examples cold war or, hybrid war. The main characteristic of this war is where nothing that disrupts the enemy is off limits.
Despite an unprecedented downturn in US-China relations during a pandemic, US businesses are not leaving the China market. This was a major finding of an annual survey of members released today by the US-China Business Council (USCBC), a trade group representing more than 200 businesses, many of them global brands with decades of China experience.
https://www.uschina.org/media/press/pandemic-and-politics-aside-us-china-trade-ties-continue
Extracts from Here Comes China
Excellent overview – How Did China Succeed? | Joseph E. Stiglitz on China’s Economic System
Although Stiglitz is a world banker, he holds different views from the trademark, neoliberal Washington consensus, specifically an economic ideology holding that while people should own the value they produce themselves, economic value derived from land (including all natural resources and natural opportunities) should belong equally to all members of society. His wide overview here on the growth of China makes sense and is easy listening.
[embedded content]
China’s central bank has taken the lead in digital currencies. What does it mean for businesses? by Jemma Xu and Dan Prud’homme
Outside China, digital currencies are fraught with incredible risk. In this void, China’s Digital Currency Electronic Payments offers the public confidence unobtainable by private digital currencies. DCEP is itself a stablecoin, but one backed 1:1 by the PBoC with fiat Chinese yuan/renminbi. Its system follows a “two layer” approach. First, and critically, because it is a sovereign digital currency, the PBoC is the only issuing party. Second, to expeditiously diffuse the currency, the central bank issues DCEP to select retail banks and non-financial institutions (e.g., Alibaba, Tencent, and Union Pay) in China with strong pre-existing mobile payment networks, who then merely distribute the currency to the general public. Businesses across China will be required by law to accept DCEP as payment.
Besides the regulatory legitimacy, many factors position DCEP to become the world’s most widely used digital currency:
the Chinese state’s track record of rapid institutional innovation;
Chinese public support of institutional experimentation;
Chinese firms’ strong competitiveness in digital ecosystems and
capabilities to quickly adapt to changing technological paradigms and institutions;
a massive Chinese population who quickly adopts new digital technologies, and
lead the world in adopting mobile payment applications.
Although central banks in several other countries have also been studying digital currencies, none have taken the lead to actually develop and rollout a CBDC at the scale occurring in China. DCEP will be used for purchases in all sectors across the country. To start, as of mid-2020, DCEP has been piloted in the Chinese cities of Shenzhen, Chengdu, Suzhou and Xiong’an – potentially reaching over 42 million people, more than Canada’s entire population. Elsewhere in China, DCEP is already in the process of being piloted in the restaurant and hospitality sectors, with foreign multinationals such as McDonald’s, Starbucks, and Subway already signing up to participate. Further, DCEP trials are already being conducted around China to reimburse public sector employees’ travel costs. Yet other pilot initiatives, such as a commitment to use DCEP at venues for large-scale upcoming events in Beijing, are in place.
Meanwhile, the Chinese government recently proposed the creation of a regional digital currency backed by the Chinese RMB/yuan, Japanese yen, South Korean won, and Hong Kong dollar – with DCEP at the centre. And China’s multi-trillion dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) offers a network to extend DCEP in countries around the globe.
Businesses should prepare for DCEP’s rollout in two main ways. First, they must ensure that they have appropriate infrastructure in place to accommodate DCEP, such as digital wallets. Contracts with third-party financial custodians can also be helpful. On the upside, to facilitate swift legal compliance with DCEP – considering that its acceptance is being required by law in China – the Chinese authorities may integrate DCEP with popular existing digital wallets already widely used by many businesses in China, namely Alipay and Wechat Pay.
Second, businesses may need to explore interoperability options when conducting cross-border trade. Such action may be needed in the longer term if DCEP leads to an alternative international payments system vis-à-vis the current US-led system, which is a probable prospect.
Meanwhile, firms who timely prepare for China’s DCEP rollout can seize several significant opportunities. First, as previously alluded to, the expansion of DCEP will facilitate the internationalisation of the yuan/renminbi. In doing so, the Chinese currency will provide a strong alternative institution to rival the current USD-dominated international payments system.
Third, by facilitating direct transactions between digital wallets, DCEP will eliminate sizeable banking clearing and settlements costs. In other words, ‘payment is settlement’ with no need for separate clearing and settlement processes.
Fourth, DCEP will offer firms new ways of raising capital and secondary trading via the issuance of digital securities and disintermediated trading on exchanges. Digital securities are regulated financial instruments such as equities or bonds where the transaction and shareholder details are recorded on the blockchain ledger. As a stable currency, DCEP will be used to reduce or eliminate the clearing and settlement processes associated with trading digital securities on secondary exchanges. In turn, this will provide firms and investors easier access to digital financial instruments.
Fifth, DCEP’s development will catalyse fintech innovation, giving rise to hybrid products that draw on both traditional markets and digital currencies. Greater numbers of innovative structured products are appearing in the digital currencies market, where the underlying asset is a native digital currency, such as Bitcoin, but the payoffs are based on traditional structured products. DCEP will serve as a reliable alternative underlying-asset in the future, stimulating the creation of more hybrid financial products.
Fifth, and not least, aggregate demand may rise as a result of DCEP’s rollout. DCEP adoption will allow governments to rapidly deploy “helicopter money” to the public without requiring bank accounts. This will empower the previously unbanked to form a new group of consumers.[MORE]
Debt – People criticizing China’s debt see only the debit side of the ledger. If they look at the credit side, they would see offsetting assets. One of those assets is the $20 billion Three Gorges Dam, which generates 100 billion KWh which it sells for US$0.084/KwH, bringing in $8.4 billion every year. Three Gorges tours earn another $3 billion, and flood mitigation and irrigation enhancement save another $3 billion, as the current flooding demonstrates. That’s valuable debt!
China pledged to invest $5.8 billion in the construction of the Moscow-Kazan High Speed Railway. The railway will be extended to China through Kazakhstan. The total cost of the Moscow-Kazan high speed railroad project is $21.4 billion. [MORE]
The Caspian Sea is becoming an alternative to the Suez for shipping between Europe and China, and a great deal of activity is taking place there. Four major Belt & Road routes and one significant Indian route make up the five East-West intersections that the Caspian is shortly to provide, with the potential for a sixth should plans to create a canal between the Caspian and Black Seas come to fruition. [Download Chris Devonshire-Ellis’ Report]
The Port of Beirut poses the biggest geostrategic threat to American power projection because China’s Silk Road is fast creeping towards the docks at Beirut Port. The US, having recently forced Israel to cancel its Haifa rail contract with China, has dampened the Chinese advance in the eastern Mediterranean, and what remains now in the path of the US is the Beirut Port. The US must either invade it to block the Chinese geostrategic mission creep, or else destroy it.[MORE]
See everyone next week for the regular Here Comes China newsletter. It is a pleasure to work with Godfree and to collate the main points for The Saker Blog.
amarynth
Share this: Like this: Like Loading… Related
Filed under: American Hegemony, China | Tagged: Beirut’s Port Explosion, Caspian Sea, China-US Relations, China’s DCEP, cold war, Hybrid war against China, Suez Canal |


jewworldorder--2020-08-16--NZ Christchurch Mosque shooting staged

NZ Christchurch Mosque shooting staged

I ’ ve spent a considerable amount of time thinking about the New Zealand event .
I ’ ve watched the video of the shooting many , many times and second by second in many spots .
I ’ ve thought about why it ’ s being treated as a censorship and gun grab tool .
I ’ ve wondered why the manifesto and its contents were put out there .
I ’ ve thought about all of the ramifications of each detail .
Now I ’ m going to explain why I think the entire event was nothing but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killed or injured .
It has taken me several days to finally draw this logical conclusion .
Now I ’ m going to tell you exactly why .
Feel free to agree or disagree .
I ’ m going to specifically reference different parts of the shooting video .
Once again , here is the video for you to follow along : 3:05 to 4:20 While driving to the Mosque Brenton Tarrant inexplicably pulls off to the side of the road and waits .
He ’ s not doing anything in the car @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand on the steering wheel for most of the time .
As a person in red gets within view of his car , Tarrant makes a quick signal to the person with his right hand .
This is a , “ I ’ m your guy and I see you ” signal .
Just as the person in red walks past Tarrant ’ s car , Tarrant continues driving to the Mosque .
The person in red is making sure Tarrant is there and giving Tarrant the signal to start the event .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ thing before .
Remember the Ft. Lauderdale airport event from 2017 ?
Well , in that event there which took place in January , there was a man dressed in all green with a white beard that looked like Santa Claus .
As each person ran up to this man , they took a left .
He was the signal to run left .
4:57 to 5:05 While continuing the drive to the mosque , Tarrant is again looking for someone dressed in red as an indicator of where to turn .
However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obstructing his view .
As Tarrant is almost past the turn into the mosque , he sees the second person dressed in red .
Tarrant slams on the brakes and makes a quick left turn .
However , because he saw the second man in red so late , he partially drove past the turn .
Tarrant then had to reverse his car backward before continuing into the mosque because he saw the man so late and partially missed the turn .
5:50 to 6:00 Tarrant gets a bit confused looking for where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knows it ’ s at the end of an alley facing onto a main road with a red car parked directly across the street .
It takes him a few seconds to locate the red car but he manages just fine .
6:20 to 6:26 Tarrant gets out of his car with a large rifle .
He turns right and begins walking on a sidewalk to the mosque .
Two people are directly in front of him next to a red car and look right at him .
Neither person is alarmed or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We can rule out the possibility that Tarrant wasn ’ t carrying the gun here as you can see the gun barrel in several frames .
Thus , the lack of reaction by these two people tell me they are in on the event .
When Tarrant reaches the two people by the red car , he takes a right into the mosque courtyard .
Note that we have now had FOUR red markers .
6:35 to 6:42 Tarrant starts firing inside the mosque courtyard .
Note the casing from his eighth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another wall .
This tells us these casings are likely not digitally added but are real casings .
Two men can be seen standing in the doorway when Tarrant begins firing .
One falls in the doorway and the other crawls inside .
The scene inside the doorway isn ’ t clear .
I think there may have been an edit here where Tarrant fired a real gun in one video and the scene was combined with the men standing in the doorway falling .
I ’ m not sure but something strange @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that there are no visible wounds on the man laying in the doorway .
6:47 A woman ’ s voice screams out in agony but no women have yet been shot .
An audio soundtrack has been edited into this video .
Thus , it ’ s not a live video .
6:50 Note that there is a man with a gray shirt laying in the doorway to the right .
In addition , note that the door is fully open and the man ’ s right arm is approximately one foot from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Further note that people are fleeing this room out the back door .
6:52 to 6:53 As Tarrant walks down the hall , a magazine for his gun can be seen on the floor to the left .
Tarant will pick up this magazine from this exact location at 8:32 .
This is the exact staging area where Tarrant later reloads .
Thus , it appears this scene had multiple takes with a magazine being mistakenly left from a prior scene .
6:52 to 6:53 During this same time period , a man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end of the hall and appears to be shot by Tarrant .
PLEASE NOTE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TRICKERY TAKING PLACE HERE !
You just saw that this is a real person in blue .
Later you ’ ll see him get shot in the head .
What you can ’ t wrap your mind around , however , is that between these two scenes , the man is blue is switched out for a mass casualty dummy with a blood pack .
Tarrant is shooting something here but most likely blanks or some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nobody gets injured .
6:57 Tarrant reaches the end of the hall and is now firing into the large room .
He fires straight ahead and left , but only up to a 45 degree angle .
He shots won ’ t be able to hit anyone farther left than 45 degrees because he didn ’ t turn far enough left .
6:57 to 6:58 Tarrant turns to fire right .
Although Tarrant has been firing his weapon for 23 seconds now , including several shots within this room , nobody on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or taken cover .
Tarrant quickly realizes that it looks fake that nobody on the right is reacting so he quickly turns back to the left side of the room .
6:59 As Tarrant turns for a split second back to the left side of the room , we notice a couple of things .
First , a man in a gray shirt and jeans is laying on the ground with his head under some kind of furniture .
This man didn ’ t appear in the video as Tarrant entered this room @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is laying is not even close to the 45 degree angle that Tarrant turned into as he fired .
We never see the man in the gray shirt move and it ’ s impossible that he was shot as Tarrant entered the room .
Thus , he is most likely a mass casualty dummy .
Also note that there is a pile of what appear to be people in the corner that aren ’ t moving .
We have to ask why aren ’ t they moving as they would not have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tarrant fired into .
Thus , as the gray shirt man and the pile of people were supposed to have already been shot , we must realize what happened here .
Tarrant made a minor mistake as he entered the room .
As he turned left and fired into this room , Tarrant was supposed to turn his gun a full 90 degrees to the left while firing .
Tarrant messed up here .
7:00 to 7:02 Now that our actors know Tarrant is in the room , he quickly turns back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the floor .
This is to show us that they ’ re real people , at least for now .
7:02 to 7:08 A man in khaki pants tries to run by Tarrant but Tarrant apparently kills him and the man falls to the floor .
Note that he also has no visible injuries .
The man can be seen as Tarrant walks back down the hall .
The man is lying in a position with his left leg much more forward than his right leg .
7:19 to 7:30 As Tarrant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the only movement is from two people jumping out of the left side of the room .
Nobody is screaming , rolling around in pain , helping others , etc .
7:33 As Tarrant passes the dead man in the hallway in the khaki pants that we saw at 7:02 to 7:08 we can see that the man in khaki pants has moved his right leg so it ’ s directly above his left leg .
This is either a new take of this scene or he is making himself more comfortable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out .
7:36 to 7:50 Tarrant again enters the large room and continues shooting .
The few actors that were initially in this room have now left .
All that remains are mass casualty dummies .
Screams from some of the wounded can be heard somewhere .
However , it ’ s impossible to determine from where the screams are coming from and none of the injured move whatsoever .
If Tarrant heard such screams he likely would have approached the injured to finished them off , like he later does with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suspect we are hearing an audio recording edited into this video .
8:00 This time Tarrant reloads in the large room .
It ’ s the first time he hasn ’ t reloaded in the hallway .
This is a clear sign to us that all of the crisis actors are out of this room .
Now , Tarrant will use real bullets .
I suspect that when Tarrant inexplicably reloaded in the hallway that it was cover to make edits to the video and to allow the movement in and out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mass casualty dummies .
8:16 to 8:26 Now that Tarrant has reloaded and is using real bullets , he approaches the “ victims ” and fires at close range .
Now we can see the bullets entering the victims .
Although , look close , these are all mass casualty dummies .
Remember , mass casualty dummies have been used in at least these events : 1 ) LAX shooting , 2 ) Orlando Pulse shooting and 3 ) Las Vegas concert shooting .
This would not be a new trick .
8:32 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gun from the floor in the hallway .
This is the magazine that was already there before Tarrant entered the building that we saw at 6:52 to 6:53 .
It was mistakenly left there from a prior scene .
8:38 Our man in khaki pants is now fully stretched out and getting comfortable .
If he was still alive , Tarrant would have killed him.The man in khaki pants in not good at repeating his exact position from scene to scene .
8:42 The gray shirted man in the doorway from 6:50 has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his body is in the exact same position and nearly the same location , we can see that somebody moved the door so that it is now up against his body .
Everybody from this room ran away from this doorway .
Thus , it ’ s unlikely that somebody ran through this doorway AND moved this door when it was already fully open .
Most likely , this was some sort of minor mistake made between scenes .
8:44 As Tarrant leaves the mosque , there are now two bodies laying in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the men who has been there from the start .
It is unclear where the other man came from as none were seen running out this door .
The new body is laying in a pool of blood but curiously , the man who has been there for over two minutes shows no loss of blood .
The man who has been there the longest now has his left hand , that was well above his head 6:44 , well planted in between the new man ’ s genital area .
How does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is the first time that Tarrant shoots outside of the mosque courtyard .
Note that the casings from his gun look like they disappear in mid air .
9:08 to 9:09 Tarrant fires three more shots and these shots DEFINITELY DISAPPEAR IN MID AIR .
If the shots at 8:56 to 9:05 didn ’ t convince you , these definitely should .
This is concrete proof that this video wasn ’ t a live feed and has been edited .
I think the producers didn ’ t want this drill to take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out on the streets and somebody possibly killing actor Tarrant “ to stop him ” .
Thus , all shots fired outside of the controlled courtyard were digitally edited in later on .
10:00 to 10:23 Tarrant is on the street firing his new weapon that he just got out of his car .
We don ’ t see the casings land on the ground as they are out of view .
As the prior shots on the street were digitally altered at 8:56 to 9:05 and 9:08 to 9:09 , we can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shooting here either .
This is an attempt to reinforce to the skeptical viewers that Tarrant is really shooting and is shooting with real bullets .
10:33 The new man in the doorway is laying in a large pool of blood .
How did this man cross the white rug next to him without spilling even one drop of blood on it ?
10:49 Tarrant has now entered the large room and is firing again .
What appears to be the top half of a man can be seen in front of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at it and appears to hit it .
Notice the unnatural movement of this half of a person .
This is some sort of mechanical dummy placed among a room full of mass casualty dummies to make viewers think there are real people in this room .
Thus , it ’ s likely that Tarrant is using real ammunition at this point .
No other human movement can be seen at this time .
10:54 Tarrant approaches the “ victims ” on the right side of the room and begins firing at close @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be alive .
None are groaning or making any movements at all .
They do move when they are hit with bullets .
Yet , it is difficult to make out most of their faces and bodies .
It is a high probability that these are all mass casualty dummies .
To the far right in this scene are two “ dead ” people on a piece of furniture .
These two would not be able to hold such position if they had been killed as they would lose muscle control and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shirt man who we first saw at 6:59 , and who has been “ dead ” from the start despite not getting hit by any bullets , has now moved two feet to the right for this scene from his location at 6:59 .
Oops .
He still is playing dead .
Since he is in this room as live ammunition is being used , it ’ s likely that he is simply a misplaced mass casualty dummy .
11:19 Tarrant shoots blue shirt man in the head and blood splatters .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this shooting is real .
Yet , I will soon tell you why it ’ s not .
Remember , we haven ’ t seen this man move at all since 6:53 and he likely has been replace with a mass casualty dummy at some point when Tarrant left the room .
Just because he was a real person in one scene doesn ’ t make him a real person in another scene .
What is likely going on here is Tarrant shot and hit a blood squib that was planted on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have seen blood squibs on numerous occasions in these events .
If you don ’ t believe me , go watch “ The Boston Unbombing ” about the fake Boston Marathon Bombing .
11:21 Tarrant shoots a mass casualty dummy propped up against a wall in a corner .
11:26 to 11:33 Tarrant shoots a pile of mass casualty dummies in the left corner of the room .
Again , none of them show any signs that they are real people and not dummies .
Zero people so far have had any visible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is some impressive trickery that starts here .
Tarrant shoots at two girls as they exit the courtyard through a door on a fence .
11:51 to 11:53 Tarrant shoots at one of the girls who is outside of the courtyard .
The other seems to inexplicably disappeared .
Remember , as we ’ ve seen earlier , all shots outside of the courtyard so far have been fake.The reason is to not alarm people outside of the controlled environment of the courtyard where this hoax is taking place .
Also , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not in on the fake event tried to intervene and kill actor Tarrant .
Like earlier , we don ’ t see these casings fall anywhere as they are “ out of camera range ” .
11:59 The “ girl ” that has been shot makes a robotic movement into the street .
This is some kind of mechanical dummy .
Note , we hear “ Help me ” in a Muslim voice .
Come on now .
This audio has been dubbed in .
Note the placement of the girl/mechanical dummy in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the street where Tarrant parked his card using the same marker .
Note we never see the girl ’ s/mechanical dummy ’ s face .
Three suv ’ s two white that appear to be the same and one black , run interference on the street to block traffic even though no cars are stopped in front of them .
The two white suv ’ s make it difficult to match up this scene for video fakery if multiple takes were needed as there would be two of the same reference points ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and shoots the girl/mechanical dummy in the upper torso .
However , the blood squib malfunctions this time !
Instead of exploding like it did with the blue shirted man at 11:19 , the squib not only doesn ’ t explode but it moves to where it is clearly visible at the girl ’ s right elbow ( red square ) .
BIG OOPS !
Next , Tarrant shoots the girl/mechanical dummy in the head .
The expected result is blood splatter from the head like we saw from the blue shirted man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the blood squib does detonate but detonates in the wrong location under the girl/mechanical dummy .
Note that there was also some kind of device used to fling a piece of hair off of the mechanical dummy .
I was originally fooled by this scene until I watched it several times .
The fact that this event is a hoax doesn ’ t change much at all from it being a false flag .
I understand that many will find this harder to believe but I just look at what the available @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m surprised I missed some of these things initially .
Anyway , it all makes perfect sense now .
It ’ s obvious why the New Zealand government doesn ’ t want this video in the public domain because it doesn ’ t add up to careful scrutiny .
One other thing I wanted to add is the little detail about this playing “ live ” on Facebook .
This is a little trick the producers use so that most can ’ t comprehend that it could be a prerecorded performance .
How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was prerecorded ?
Well , this is the exact trick that was used in the Charlottesville event that I conclusively proved was a hoax .
“ Eyewitness ” Marissa Blair recorded the Charlottesville event live on a Facebook live stream .
The only problem is that I conclusively proved her video to be a prerecorded fake .
Thus , like the colors/marker trick stated above , the use of mass casualty dummies , etc .
the use of facebook live stream to prove a prerecorded video is live is also a little trick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this fully implicates Facebook itself in the corruption too .

I’ve spent a considerable amount of time thinking about the New Zealand event. I’ve watched the video of the shooting many, many times and second by second in many spots. I’ve thought about why it’s being treated as a censorship and gun grab tool. I’ve wondered why the manifesto and its contents were put out there. I’ve thought about all of the ramifications of each detail. Now I’m going to explain why I think the entire event was nothing but a theatrical production where ABSOLUTELY NOBODY was killed or injured. It has taken me several days to finally draw this logical conclusion. Now I’m going to tell you exactly why. Feel free to agree or disagree.
I’m going to specifically reference different parts of the shooting video. Once again, here is the video for you to follow along:
https://up.ey.md/f.php?h=2XN6P_7t
3:05 to 4:20 While driving to the Mosque Brenton Tarrant inexplicably pulls off to the side of the road and waits. He’s not doing anything in the car here. You can see his right hand on the steering wheel for most of the time. As a person in red gets within view of his car, Tarrant makes a quick signal to the person with his right hand. This is a, “I’m your guy and I see you” signal. Just as the person in red walks past Tarrant’s car, Tarrant continues driving to the Mosque. The person in red is making sure Tarrant is there and giving Tarrant the signal to start the event. We’ve seen this sort of thing before. Remember the Ft. Lauderdale airport event from 2017? Well, in that event there which took place in January, there was a man dressed in all green with a white beard that looked like Santa Claus. As each person ran up to this man, they took a left. He was the signal to run left.
4:57 to 5:05 While continuing the drive to the mosque, Tarrant is again looking for someone dressed in red as an indicator of where to turn. However, the street is lined with cars obstructing his view. As Tarrant is almost past the turn into the mosque, he sees the second person dressed in red. Tarrant slams on the brakes and makes a quick left turn. However, because he saw the second man in red so late, he partially drove past the turn. Tarrant then had to reverse his car backward before continuing into the mosque because he saw the man so late and partially missed the turn.
5:50 to 6:00 Tarrant gets a bit confused looking for where he is supposed to park. He knows it’s at the end of an alley facing onto a main road with a red car parked directly across the street. It takes him a few seconds to locate the red car but he manages just fine.
6:20 to 6:26 Tarrant gets out of his car with a large rifle. He turns right and begins walking on a sidewalk to the mosque. Two people are directly in front of him next to a red car and look right at him. Neither person is alarmed or afraid that Tarrant is carrying a gun. We can rule out the possibility that Tarrant wasn’t carrying the gun here as you can see the gun barrel in several frames. Thus, the lack of reaction by these two people tell me they are in on the event. When Tarrant reaches the two people by the red car, he takes a right into the mosque courtyard. Note that we have now had FOUR red markers.
6:35 to 6:42 Tarrant starts firing inside the mosque courtyard. Note the casing from his eighth shot hits one wall and ricochets into another wall. This tells us these casings are likely not digitally added but are real casings. Two men can be seen standing in the doorway when Tarrant begins firing. One falls in the doorway and the other crawls inside. The scene inside the doorway isn’t clear. I think there may have been an edit here where Tarrant fired a real gun in one video and the scene was combined with the men standing in the doorway falling. I’m not sure but something strange is going on here.
6:44 Note that there are no visible wounds on the man laying in the doorway.
6:47 A woman’s voice screams out in agony but no women have yet been shot. An audio soundtrack has been edited into this video. Thus, it’s not a live video.
6:50 Note that there is a man with a gray shirt laying in the doorway to the right. In addition, note that the door is fully open and the man’s right arm is approximately one foot from the door. He appears dead. Further note that people are fleeing this room out the back door.
6:52 to 6:53 As Tarrant walks down the hall, a magazine for his gun can be seen on the floor to the left. Tarant will pick up this magazine from this exact location at 8:32. This is the exact staging area where Tarrant later reloads. Thus, it appears this scene had multiple takes with a magazine being mistakenly left from a prior scene.
6:52 to 6:53 During this same time period, a man in blue runs across the doorway at the end of the hall and appears to be shot by Tarrant. PLEASE NOTE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL TRICKERY TAKING PLACE HERE! You just saw that this is a real person in blue. Later you’ll see him get shot in the head. What you can’t wrap your mind around, however, is that between these two scenes, the man is blue is switched out for a mass casualty dummy with a blood pack. Tarrant is shooting something here but most likely blanks or some kind of special effects gun so that nobody gets injured.
6:57 Tarrant reaches the end of the hall and is now firing into the large room. He fires straight ahead and left, but only up to a 45 degree angle. He shots won’t be able to hit anyone farther left than 45 degrees because he didn’t turn far enough left.
6:57 to 6:58 Tarrant turns to fire right. Although Tarrant has been firing his weapon for 23 seconds now, including several shots within this room, nobody on the right side of the room has reacted or taken cover. Tarrant quickly realizes that it looks fake that nobody on the right is reacting so he quickly turns back to the left side of the room.
6:59 As Tarrant turns for a split second back to the left side of the room, we notice a couple of things. First, a man in a gray shirt and jeans is laying on the ground with his head under some kind of furniture. This man didn’t appear in the video as Tarrant entered this room shooting. Further, where this man is laying is not even close to the 45 degree angle that Tarrant turned into as he fired. We never see the man in the gray shirt move and it’s impossible that he was shot as Tarrant entered the room. Thus, he is most likely a mass casualty dummy. Also note that there is a pile of what appear to be people in the corner that aren’t moving. We have to ask why aren’t they moving as they would not have been in the 45 degree angle range that Tarrant fired into. Thus, as the gray shirt man and the pile of people were supposed to have already been shot, we must realize what happened here. Tarrant made a minor mistake as he entered the room. As he turned left and fired into this room, Tarrant was supposed to turn his gun a full 90 degrees to the left while firing. Tarrant messed up here.
7:00 to 7:02 Now that our actors know Tarrant is in the room, he quickly turns back to them to catch them on video diving to the floor. This is to show us that they’re real people, at least for now.
7:02 to 7:08 A man in khaki pants tries to run by Tarrant but Tarrant apparently kills him and the man falls to the floor. Note that he also has no visible injuries. The man can be seen as Tarrant walks back down the hall. The man is lying in a position with his left leg much more forward than his right leg.
7:19 to 7:30 As Tarrant reenters the large room and continues shooting, the only movement is from two people jumping out of the left side of the room. Nobody is screaming, rolling around in pain, helping others, etc.
7:33 As Tarrant passes the dead man in the hallway in the khaki pants that we saw at 7:02 to 7:08 we can see that the man in khaki pants has moved his right leg so it’s directly above his left leg. This is either a new take of this scene or he is making himself more comfortable as the rest of the scene plays out.
7:36 to 7:50 Tarrant again enters the large room and continues shooting. The few actors that were initially in this room have now left. All that remains are mass casualty dummies. Screams from some of the wounded can be heard somewhere. However, it’s impossible to determine from where the screams are coming from and none of the injured move whatsoever. If Tarrant heard such screams he likely would have approached the injured to finished them off, like he later does with the girl outside. Thus, I again suspect we are hearing an audio recording edited into this video.
8:00 This time Tarrant reloads in the large room. It’s the first time he hasn’t reloaded in the hallway. This is a clear sign to us that all of the crisis actors are out of this room. Now, Tarrant will use real bullets. I suspect that when Tarrant inexplicably reloaded in the hallway that it was cover to make edits to the video and to allow the movement in and out of the large room of crisis actors and mass casualty dummies.
8:16 to 8:26 Now that Tarrant has reloaded and is using real bullets, he approaches the “victims” and fires at close range. Now we can see the bullets entering the victims. Although, look close, these are all mass casualty dummies. Remember, mass casualty dummies have been used in at least these events: 1) LAX shooting, 2)Orlando Pulse shooting and 3) Las Vegas concert shooting. This would not be a new trick.
8:32 Tarrant picks up a magazine for his gun from the floor in the hallway. This is the magazine that was already there before Tarrant entered the building that we saw at 6:52 to 6:53. It was mistakenly left there from a prior scene.
8:38 Our man in khaki pants is now fully stretched out and getting comfortable. If he was still alive, Tarrant would have killed him.The man in khaki pants in not good at repeating his exact position from scene to scene.
8:42 The gray shirted man in the doorway from 6:50 has now been dead for 1:52. Although his body is in the exact same position and nearly the same location, we can see that somebody moved the door so that it is now up against his body. Everybody from this room ran away from this doorway. Thus, it’s unlikely that somebody ran through this doorway AND moved this door when it was already fully open. Most likely, this was some sort of minor mistake made between scenes.
8:44 As Tarrant leaves the mosque, there are now two bodies laying in the doorway. One is one of the men who has been there from the start. It is unclear where the other man came from as none were seen running out this door. The new body is laying in a pool of blood but curiously, the man who has been there for over two minutes shows no loss of blood. The man who has been there the longest now has his left hand, that was well above his head 6:44, well planted in between the new man’s genital area. How does that happen exactly?
8:56 to 9:05 This is the first time that Tarrant shoots outside of the mosque courtyard. Note that the casings from his gun look like they disappear in mid air.
9:08 to 9:09 Tarrant fires three more shots and these shots DEFINITELY DISAPPEAR IN MID AIR. If the shots at 8:56 to 9:05 didn’t convince you, these definitely should. This is concrete proof that this video wasn’t a live feed and has been edited. I think the producers didn’t want this drill to take place with witnesses reporting a live shooting out on the streets and somebody possibly killing actor Tarrant “to stop him”. Thus, all shots fired outside of the controlled courtyard were digitally edited in later on.
10:00 to 10:23 Tarrant is on the street firing his new weapon that he just got out of his car. We don’t see the casings land on the ground as they are out of view. As the prior shots on the street were digitally altered at 8:56 to 9:05 and 9:08 to 9:09, we can safely say that Tarrant isn’t shooting here either. This is an attempt to reinforce to the skeptical viewers that Tarrant is really shooting and is shooting with real bullets.
10:33 The new man in the doorway is laying in a large pool of blood. How did this man cross the white rug next to him without spilling even one drop of blood on it?
10:49 Tarrant has now entered the large room and is firing again. What appears to be the top half of a man can be seen in front of the window to the right. Tarrant fires at it and appears to hit it. Notice the unnatural movement of this half of a person. This is some sort of mechanical dummy placed among a room full of mass casualty dummies to make viewers think there are real people in this room. Thus, it’s likely that Tarrant is using real ammunition at this point. No other human movement can be seen at this time.
10:54 Tarrant approaches the “victims” on the right side of the room and begins firing at close range. None of the victims appear to be alive. None are groaning or making any movements at all. They do move when they are hit with bullets. Yet, it is difficult to make out most of their faces and bodies. It is a high probability that these are all mass casualty dummies. To the far right in this scene are two “dead” people on a piece of furniture. These two would not be able to hold such position if they had been killed as they would lose muscle control and fall over.
11:16 and 11:18 Gray shirt man who we first saw at 6:59 , and who has been “dead” from the start despite not getting hit by any bullets, has now moved two feet to the right for this scene from his location at 6:59. Oops. He still is playing dead. Since he is in this room as live ammunition is being used, it’s likely that he is simply a misplaced mass casualty dummy.
11:19 Tarrant shoots blue shirt man in the head and blood splatters. This is the most convincing scene for believing this shooting is real. Yet, I will soon tell you why it’s not. Remember, we haven’t seen this man move at all since 6:53 and he likely has been replace with a mass casualty dummy at some point when Tarrant left the room. Just because he was a real person in one scene doesn’t make him a real person in another scene. What is likely going on here is Tarrant shot and hit a blood squib that was planted on the mass casualty dummy. Yes, we have seen blood squibs on numerous occasions in these events. If you don’t believe me, go watch “The Boston Unbombing” about the fake Boston Marathon Bombing.
11:21 Tarrant shoots a mass casualty dummy propped up against a wall in a corner.
11:26 to 11:33 Tarrant shoots a pile of mass casualty dummies in the left corner of the room. Again, none of them show any signs that they are real people and not dummies. Zero people so far have had any visible injuries at all.
11:46 to 11:48 There is some impressive trickery that starts here. Tarrant shoots at two girls as they exit the courtyard through a door on a fence.
11:51 to 11:53 Tarrant shoots at one of the girls who is outside of the courtyard. The other seems to inexplicably disappeared. Remember, as we’ve seen earlier, all shots outside of the courtyard so far have been fake.The reason is to not alarm people outside of the controlled environment of the courtyard where this hoax is taking place. Also, it would be a disaster if somebody not in on the fake event tried to intervene and kill actor Tarrant. Like earlier, we don’t see these casings fall anywhere as they are “out of camera range”.
11:59 The “girl” that has been shot makes a robotic movement into the street. This is some kind of mechanical dummy. Note, we hear “Help me” in a Muslim voice. Come on now. This audio has been dubbed in. Note the placement of the girl/mechanical dummy in front of the red car parked across the street where Tarrant parked his card using the same marker. Note we never see the girl’s/mechanical dummy’s face. Three suv’s two white that appear to be the same and one black, run interference on the street to block traffic even though no cars are stopped in front of them. The two white suv’s make it difficult to match up this scene for video fakery if multiple takes were needed as there would be two of the same reference points (white suv).
12:07 Tarrant approaches and shoots the girl/mechanical dummy in the upper torso. However, the blood squib malfunctions this time! Instead of exploding like it did with the blue shirted man at 11:19, the squib not only doesn’t explode but it moves to where it is clearly visible at the girl’s right elbow (red square). BIG OOPS! Next, Tarrant shoots the girl/mechanical dummy in the head. The expected result is blood splatter from the head like we saw from the blue shirted man at 11:19. This time, however, the blood squib does detonate but detonates in the wrong location under the girl/mechanical dummy. Note that there was also some kind of device used to fling a piece of hair off of the mechanical dummy. I was originally fooled by this scene until I watched it several times.
The fact that this event is a hoax doesn’t change much at all from it being a false flag. I understand that many will find this harder to believe but I just look at what the available evidence is. Frankly, I’m surprised I missed some of these things initially. Anyway, it all makes perfect sense now. It’s obvious why the New Zealand government doesn’t want this video in the public domain because it doesn’t add up to careful scrutiny.
One other thing I wanted to add is the little detail about this playing “live” on Facebook. This is a little trick the producers use so that most can’t comprehend that it could be a prerecorded performance. How could they edit the video if it was prerecorded? Well, this is the exact trick that was used in the Charlottesville event that I conclusively proved was a hoax. “Eyewitness” Marissa Blair recorded the Charlottesville event live on a Facebook live stream. The only problem is that I conclusively proved her video to be a prerecorded fake. Thus, like the colors/marker trick stated above, the use of mass casualty dummies, etc. the use of facebook live stream to prove a prerecorded video is live is also a little trick that’s used. Of course, this fully implicates Facebook itself in the corruption too.


jewworldorder--2020-08-16--Dracula was a Jew

Dracula was a Jew

Until now its lonely mountains have been synonymous with the legend of the vampire , the cruel ruler who drank his victims ’ blood , terrified his enemies and could turn into a bat at will .
But Transylvania should also be known as the ancestral home of the Prince of Wales , defender of faiths , with a love of gardening and classical architecture , according to the Romanian National Tourist Office .
Links between the Royal Family and Vlad the Impaler , the 15th century nobleman whose deeds inspired the vampire legend , are being exploited in an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ European country .
The Romanian National Tourist Office is trumpeting the lineage in a brochure distributed at the World Travel Market , a leading industry event which opened in London on Monday .
The Prince himself appears in a video being used to promote the country in which he claims distant kinship with Vlad Tepes , the 15th–century Wallachian ruler on whom the Irish novelist Bram Stoker based his Dracula .
“ Transylvania is in my blood , ” he jokes in an interview first shown on satelite television last year .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vlad the Impaler , so I do have a bit of a stake in the country.
” The Romanian National Tourist Office is using the video on Youtube and new brochures try and boost UK visitors by more than seven per cent .
The video climaxes with a reference to the Prince of Wales , “ who can trace his ancestry back to Romania ’ s dark and distant past ” .
Other literature highlights a short visit by Prince Harry to the country in Easter this year , saying he travelled with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a week to four Romanian cities from London Luton Airport .
A spokesman for the Romanian National Tourist Office said the country , which incorporates the region of Transylvania , was looking to use these links with the British Royal Family to increase UK tourists over the coming years .
Maria Iordache , UK director of the organisation , said 118,000 UK tourists visited Romania in 2011 .
“ It will be more in 2012 .
We have experienced a 7 per cent increase in UK visitors in the first quarter , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the UK .
For the summer and the autumn the percentage increase will be even better.
” According to Royal Highness , a book published in 1982 by Sir Iain Moncreiffe , the former chairman of Debrett ’ s , the Prince is a great grandson 16 times removed to Vlad III .
He can trace his lineage back through his great grandmother Queen Mary , the consort of George V , to Vlad IV , the half brother of the notorious ruler .
Another link to the country originated with Princess @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Queen Victoria and Prince Albert , who went on to marry King Ferdinand 1 of Romania and ruled Romania after the First World War .
It has been claimed that porphyria , an iron deficiency which is thought to lie behind the vampire myth , has run in the Royal Family .
The Prince has made no secret of his love for Romania and is believed to travel there frequently .
In 2006 , he purchased a farmhouse in Viscri , a village in rural Transylvania , which is available as a guest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The prince is patron of the Mihai Eminescu Trust , which works to restore the cultural heritage , economy and nature of Transylvania ’ s Saxon villages and their surroundings .
In addition to restoring some 180 medieval houses and several churches , the charity has supported traditional rural technologies such as the construction of wood-fired kilns for handmade bricks and tiles , and organic farming .
Transylvanian-born Vlad the Impaler is said to have dispatched more than 100,000 Turkish warriors in battle .
The vampire legend is said to have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dipped in his victim ’ s blood .
Dracula means “ son of the devil ” in Romanian .
The country ’ s alleged links to British royalty , however ghoulish , could prove a welcome boost to its tourist industry .
Thousands of tourists visit the town of Castle Bran , Transylvania , where Vlad III lived , every year .
Simon Press , from World Travel Market which hosted the exhibition , said : “ “ Romania has a great deal of tourism potential .
It is a beautiful country already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ culture .
“ The link to the British Royal Family and the clear fondness the Royal Family has for the country will only help to promote the country across the Commonwealth and particularly in the UK.
” THE LINK TO AN IMPALER Vlad IV , known as Vlad the Monk .
( 1431 – 1495 ) Princess Mary of Teck , later the Queen consort of King George V ( 1867-1953 ) .

Until now its lonely mountains have been synonymous with the legend of the vampire, the cruel ruler who drank his victims’ blood, terrified his enemies and could turn into a bat at will.
But Transylvania should also be known as the ancestral home of the Prince of Wales, defender of faiths, with a love of gardening and classical architecture, according to the Romanian National Tourist Office.
Links between the Royal Family and Vlad the Impaler, the 15th century nobleman whose deeds inspired the vampire legend, are being exploited in an attempt to lure tourists to the eastern European country.
The Romanian National Tourist Office is trumpeting the lineage in a brochure distributed at the World Travel Market, a leading industry event which opened in London on Monday.
The Prince himself appears in a video being used to promote the country in which he claims distant kinship with Vlad Tepes, the 15th–century Wallachian ruler on whom the Irish novelist Bram Stoker based his Dracula.
“Transylvania is in my blood,” he jokes in an interview first shown on satelite television last year. “The genealogy shows I am descended from Vlad the Impaler, so I do have a bit of a stake in the country.”
The Romanian National Tourist Office is using the video on Youtube and new brochures try and boost UK visitors by more than seven per cent.
The Prince visits Viscri, Transylvania, back in 2006 (Rex)
The video climaxes with a reference to the Prince of Wales, “who can trace his ancestry back to Romania’s dark and distant past”.
Other literature highlights a short visit by Prince Harry to the country in Easter this year, saying he travelled with Wizz Air, which operates 20 flights a week to four Romanian cities from London Luton Airport.
A spokesman for the Romanian National Tourist Office said the country, which incorporates the region of Transylvania, was looking to use these links with the British Royal Family to increase UK tourists over the coming years.
Maria Iordache, UK director of the organisation, said 118,000 UK tourists visited Romania in 2011.
“It will be more in 2012. We have experienced a 7 per cent increase in UK visitors in the first quarter, which is traditionally a quiet period for tourists from the UK. For the summer and the autumn the percentage increase will be even better.”
According to Royal Highness, a book published in 1982 by Sir Iain Moncreiffe, the former chairman of Debrett’s, the Prince is a great grandson 16 times removed to Vlad III.
He can trace his lineage back through his great grandmother Queen Mary, the consort of George V, to Vlad IV, the half brother of the notorious ruler.
Another link to the country originated with Princess Marie of Edinburgh, a granddaughter of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, who went on to marry King Ferdinand 1 of Romania and ruled Romania after the First World War.
It has been claimed that porphyria, an iron deficiency which is thought to lie behind the vampire myth, has run in the Royal Family.
The Prince has made no secret of his love for Romania and is believed to travel there frequently.
In 2006, he purchased a farmhouse in Viscri, a village in rural Transylvania, which is available as a guest house at certain times of the year.
The Prince’s farmhouse in Viscri
The prince is patron of the Mihai Eminescu Trust, which works to restore the cultural heritage, economy and nature of Transylvania’s Saxon villages and their surroundings.
In addition to restoring some 180 medieval houses and several churches, the charity has supported traditional rural technologies such as the construction of wood-fired kilns for handmade bricks and tiles, and organic farming.
Transylvanian-born Vlad the Impaler is said to have dispatched more than 100,000 Turkish warriors in battle.
The vampire legend is said to have been inspired by his predilection for eating bread dipped in his victim’s blood. Dracula means “son of the devil” in Romanian.
The country’s alleged links to British royalty, however ghoulish, could prove a welcome boost to its tourist industry.
Thousands of tourists visit the town of Castle Bran, Transylvania, where Vlad III lived, every year.
Castle Bran, Transylvania (Alamy)
Simon Press, from World Travel Market which hosted the exhibition, said: ““Romania has a great deal of tourism potential. It is a beautiful country already receiving many tourists for its nature and culture.
“The link to the British Royal Family and the clear fondness the Royal Family has for the country will only help to promote the country across the Commonwealth and particularly in the UK.”
THE LINK TO AN IMPALER
Vlad the Impaler. Died 1507.
– Half brother of:
Vlad IV, known as Vlad the Monk. (1431 – 1495)
-Father of:
Radu IV Prince of Wallachia from (1495 – 1508)
– Father of:
Mircea the Shepherd. Prince of Wallachia. (1479 – 1560).
– Father of:
Princess Stanca Basarab of Wallachia. (1518 – 1601).
-Mother of:
Zamphira Logofat de Szazsebes. (Died 1602).
– Mother of:
Adam Racz de Galgo. (Living 1609).
– Father of:
Peter Racz de Galgo. (1583-1672).
– Father of:
Christina Racz de Galgo.
– Mother of:
Catherine (Katalin) Kuun de Osdola.
– Mother of:
Ágnes Kendeffy de Malmoviz (born 1727).
– Mother of:
Baron Gregor, Inczédy de Nagy-Várad (died 1816).
– Father of:
Baroness Ágnes Inczédy de Nagy-Várad (1788-1856).
– Mother of:
Countess Claudine Rhédey von Kis-Rhéde (1812-1841).
– Mother of:
Francis, Duke of Teck. (1837–1900).
– Father of:
Princess Mary of Teck, later the Queen consort of King George V (1867-1953).
– Mother of:
George VI (1895 –1952).
– Father of:
Queen Elizabeth II (1926).
– Mother of:
Prince Charles (1948)


jewworldorder--2020-08-16--Hydro Tasmania asked to explain cloud seeding in catchment day before flooding

Hydro Tasmania asked to explain cloud seeding in catchment day before flooding Tasmania ’ s government-owned energy company has been asked to explain why it conducted cloud seeding over the Derwent River catchment the day before flooding began this week .
The catchment flooded on Monday near Ouse in southern Tasmania , where the search continues for a missing farmer .
In the state ’ s north , one person was killed and another remains missing .
Cloud seeding is a technique used to increase rain to bolster dams and involves the addition of a substance to suitable clouds to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raindrops .
Premier Will Hodgman said he was told Hydro Tasmania authorised cloud seeding on Sunday morning in the Upper Derwent catchment , even though heavy falls were forecast .
Mr Hodgman told 936 ABC Hobart Hydro ’ s decision was difficult to fathom at face value but Energy Minister Matthew Groom was seeking answers .
“ That ’ s why we ’ ve sought the explanation from Hydro Tasmania as to those matters , the Minister has sought that , ” he said .
“ It ’ s certainly my expectation that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to respond to those matters.
” Hydro Tasmania has confirmed it flew a cloud seeding flight the day huge storms approached the country ’ s east coast .
Documents show the flight took place on Sunday morning while there were flood warnings in place in the north .
The flight seeded clouds for more than an hour and a half just north of Great Lake , one of the largest water storage dams in the state .
The flight was targeting the Upper Derwent catchment , which mainly feeds water to several hydro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Ouse area , like Scott Ashton-Jones , want to know why the cloud seeding went ahead while flood warnings were in place for the northern half of Tasmania .
“ The extent to which cloud seeding has exaggerated the flood is still to be determined of course , but the evidence from previous cloud seeding operations is that it works and therefore it will have exaggerated the flood to some extent , ” he said .
“ The Hydro has always claimed positive results from cloud seeding.
” George Mills said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ morning , and wondered what was going on .
“ We want to understand whether the cloud seeding has helped to create this massive flood from the local rivers which we ’ ve never ever seen , ” he said .
“ If the Hydro have had something to do with that with their cloud seeding , well we want to understand that because in the future we need to have closer information.
” Hydro Tasmania will not answer questions about both Sunday ’ s cloud seeding flight and its policies on using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warnings .
A spokeswoman said it would be inappropriate to comment .
“ At this point Hydro Tasmania is not in a position to provide more information , ” she said .
“ Experience suggests that in the aftermath of a severe natural disaster such as this some form of government inquiry follows .
“ In light of the unfortunate death of one person , and with grave fears for two people still missing , there is likely to be at least a coronial inquest.
” The community of Ouse has been left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with little warning in the early hours of Monday morning .
Farmers in the district have reported the loss of hundreds of sheep and cattle , and significant infrastructure losses .
The Bureau of Meteorology has confirmed flood warnings were in place for regions of Tasmania when the flight took place .
“ The first media release alerting the Tasmanian community to likely impacts of the event was issued on Friday 3 June , ” a weather bureau spokesperson said .
“ Detailed updates have been provided directly to the local media throughout @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first flood watch for Tasmania was issued at midday on Friday , with warnings following on Saturday .
“ The first flood warnings were issued on Saturday afternoon : six to 12 hours before significant rain began to fall across northern Tasmania , ” they said .
The first minor flood warning for the Ouse and Derwent rivers was issued at 10:36pm on Sunday , after the cloud seeding flight took place .
The next day , unprecedented rainfall resulted in major flood warnings for seven Tasmanian rivers , including the Derwent and @ @

Hydro Tasmania asked to explain cloud seeding in catchment day before flooding
Updated
Tasmania’s government-owned energy company has been asked to explain why it conducted cloud seeding over the Derwent River catchment the day before flooding began this week.
Key points: Hydro Tasmania authorised cloud seeding, which increases rain, in a catchment hit hard by floods
Premier seeks explanation from Hydro
Hydro says inappropriate to comment, pending inquiries
Search continues for Ouse farmer
The catchment flooded on Monday near Ouse in southern Tasmania, where the search continues for a missing farmer.
In the state’s north, one person was killed and another remains missing.
Cloud seeding is a technique used to increase rain to bolster dams and involves the addition of a substance to suitable clouds to encourage the growth of ice crystals or raindrops.
Premier Will Hodgman said he was told Hydro Tasmania authorised cloud seeding on Sunday morning in the Upper Derwent catchment, even though heavy falls were forecast.
Mr Hodgman told 936 ABC Hobart Hydro’s decision was difficult to fathom at face value but Energy Minister Matthew Groom was seeking answers.
“That’s why we’ve sought the explanation from Hydro Tasmania as to those matters, the Minister has sought that,” he said.
“It’s certainly my expectation that will be provided at the earliest opportunity to respond to those matters.”
Hydro Tasmania has confirmed it flew a cloud seeding flight the day huge storms approached the country’s east coast.
Documents show the flight took place on Sunday morning while there were flood warnings in place in the north.
The flight seeded clouds for more than an hour and a half just north of Great Lake, one of the largest water storage dams in the state.
The flight was targeting the Upper Derwent catchment, which mainly feeds water to several hydro electric dams which lie downstream.
Farmers demand answers
Farmers in the Ouse area, like Scott Ashton-Jones, want to know why the cloud seeding went ahead while flood warnings were in place for the northern half of Tasmania.
“The extent to which cloud seeding has exaggerated the flood is still to be determined of course, but the evidence from previous cloud seeding operations is that it works and therefore it will have exaggerated the flood to some extent,” he said.
“The Hydro has always claimed positive results from cloud seeding.”
George Mills said he could hear the flight on Sunday morning, and wondered what was going on.
“We want to understand whether the cloud seeding has helped to create this massive flood from the local rivers which we’ve never ever seen,” he said.
“If the Hydro have had something to do with that with their cloud seeding, well we want to understand that because in the future we need to have closer information.”
Hydro ‘not in position’ to comment
Hydro Tasmania will not answer questions about both Sunday’s cloud seeding flight and its policies on using the technique when there are current flood warnings.
What is cloud seeding? Hydro Tasmania describes cloud seeding as a technique for increasing precipitation (eg. rain or snow) using naturally occurring clouds
“It involves the introduction of additional particles into suitable clouds to encourage the formation and growth of ice crystals or raindrops and thus increase the amount of precipitation that will fall from the cloud”
A spokeswoman said it would be inappropriate to comment.
“At this point Hydro Tasmania is not in a position to provide more information,” she said.
“Experience suggests that in the aftermath of a severe natural disaster such as this some form of government inquiry follows.
“In light of the unfortunate death of one person, and with grave fears for two people still missing, there is likely to be at least a coronial inquest.”
The community of Ouse has been left devastated by the floods, which arrived with little warning in the early hours of Monday morning.
Farmers in the district have reported the loss of hundreds of sheep and cattle, and significant infrastructure losses.
Bureau had flood warnings in place
The Bureau of Meteorology has confirmed flood warnings were in place for regions of Tasmania when the flight took place.
“The first media release alerting the Tasmanian community to likely impacts of the event was issued on Friday 3 June,” a weather bureau spokesperson said.
“Detailed updates have been provided directly to the local media throughout the event.”
The spokesperson said the first flood watch for Tasmania was issued at midday on Friday, with warnings following on Saturday.
“The first flood warnings were issued on Saturday afternoon: six to 12 hours before significant rain began to fall across northern Tasmania,” they said.
The first minor flood warning for the Ouse and Derwent rivers was issued at 10:36pm on Sunday, after the cloud seeding flight took place.
The next day, unprecedented rainfall resulted in major flood warnings for seven Tasmanian rivers, including the Derwent and Ouse.
Document Text Zoom Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-10/cloud-seeding-carried-out-over-tasmanian-catchment-before-floods
Topics: floods, disasters-and-accidents, states-and-territories, government-and-politics, tas, australia


Climate Change Hoax

Ten years after the release of Al Gore ’ s Inconvenient Truth , none of the film ’ s dire climate change predictions have come to pass .
However , in the decade since the documentary was produced , its creator has raked in millions of dollars from the entire “ global warming ” scam , and is now poised to become “ our first carbon billionaire.
” In the 2006 film , Gore made a number of wild claims regarding what we could expect to see happening over the next few years due to global warming , but virtually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out to be false .
For instance , the film predicted that that the Arctic could become ice-free within the next decades , and that polar bears would begin drowning .
Both claims were untrue .
“ In the mid- to late-2000s , Gore repeatedly predicted that an ice-free Arctic Ocean was coming soon .
“ But as usual , his fortune-telling was wrong .
By 2014 , Arctic ice had grown thicker and covered a greater area than it did when he made his prediction.
” “ A new study by Canadian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bears are currently being harmed by global warming .
Researchers with Canada ’ s Lakehead University found ‘ no evidence ’ polar bears are currently threatened by warming.
” Another prediction made in the film was that Mt .
Kilimanjaro would be snow-free “ within the decade.
” But in fact : “ In 2014 , ecologists actually monitoring Kilimanjaro ’ s snowpack found it was not even close to being gone .
It may have shrunk a little , but ecologists were confident it would be around for the foreseeable future.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that storms would begin occurring more often and at higher intensities .
“ Gore ’ s claim is more hype than actual science , since storms aren ’ t more extreme since 2006 .
In fact , not even findings from the United Nations ’ s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) support Gore ’ s claim .
“ The IPCC found in 2013 there ‘ is limited evidence of changes in extremes associated with other climate variables since the mid-20th century.
’ “ The IPCC also found ‘ no significant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the past century ’ and ‘ [ n ] o robust trends in annual numbers of tropical storms , hurricanes and major hurricanes counts have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin.
’ “ Gore should probably take these findings seriously since he shared the Nobel Prize in 2007 with the IPCC for its work on global warming.
” Although Gore ’ s claims have been thoroughly debunked by a number of experts , he has been quietly amassing a huge fortune based on the climate change @ @ @ @ @ @ @ went from $ 700,000 in 2000 to an estimated net worth of $ 172.5 million by 2015 thanks to his environmentalist activism .
Gore and the former chief of Goldman Sachs Asset Management made nearly $ 218 million in profits between 2008 and 2011 from a carbon trading company they co-founded .
By 2008 , Gore was able to put a whopping $ 35 million into hedge funds and other investments.
” • Greenpeace Founder : Humans Not to Blame for Global Warming • One of the World ’ s Most Eminent Climate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NASA : ‘ Antarctica Is Gaining More Ice Than It ’ s Losing ’ There is a growing consensus that Al Gore has perpetrated a massive fraud against the American public , and many believe that he should be held accountable .
“ It has been reported that 30,000 scientists , including a top-tier leader of the science community as well as the founder of The Weather Channel , have come forward to sue Al Gore for fraud .
“ Al Gore has made massive profits in the promotion of the global warming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ role in getting the ‘ Cap and Trade ’ legislation passed .
… “ Perhaps this lawsuit will finally give the thousands of ‘ dissenting ’ scientists a voice again.
” Ten years later , Al Gore needs to finally be exposed for the lies that have made him a very rich man .

Ten years after the release of Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth, none of the film’s dire climate change predictions have come to pass.
However, in the decade since the documentary was produced, its creator has raked in millions of dollars from the entire “global warming” scam, and is now poised to become “our first carbon billionaire.”
In the 2006 film, Gore made a number of wild claims regarding what we could expect to see happening over the next few years due to global warming, but virtually all of his alarmist prognostications have turned out to be false.
Arctic didn’t melt, polar bears are thriving
For instance, the film predicted that that the Arctic could become ice-free within the next decades, and that polar bears would begin drowning. Both claims were untrue.
As reported by Investor’s Business Daily:
“In the mid- to late-2000s, Gore repeatedly predicted that an ice-free Arctic Ocean was coming soon.
“But as usual, his fortune-telling was wrong. By 2014, Arctic ice had grown thicker and covered a greater area than it did when he made his prediction.”
And the polar bears?
The Daily Caller reports:
“A new study by Canadian scientists once again debunks the notion polar bears are currently being harmed by global warming. Researchers with Canada’s Lakehead University found ‘no evidence’ polar bears are currently threatened by warming.”
Kilimanjaro’s snow hasn’t disappeared
Another prediction made in the film was that Mt. Kilimanjaro would be snow-free “within the decade.” But in fact:
“In 2014, ecologists actually monitoring Kilimanjaro’s snowpack found it was not even close to being gone. It may have shrunk a little, but ecologists were confident it would be around for the foreseeable future.”
Extreme weather has failed to materialize
In Inconvenient Truth, Gore also forecasted that storms would begin occurring more often and at higher intensities.
Wrong again, Al:
“Gore’s claim is more hype than actual science, since storms aren’t more extreme since 2006. In fact, not even findings from the United Nations’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) support Gore’s claim.
“The IPCC found in 2013 there ‘is limited evidence of changes in extremes associated with other climate variables since the mid-20th century.’
“The IPCC also found ‘no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century’ and ‘[n]o robust trends in annual numbers of tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes counts have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin.’
“Gore should probably take these findings seriously since he shared the Nobel Prize in 2007 with the IPCC for its work on global warming.”
Despite false claims, Gore grows richer from climate change myth
Although Gore’s claims have been thoroughly debunked by a number of experts, he has been quietly amassing a huge fortune based on the climate change scam.
Mad World News reports:
“Gore’s wealth went from $700,000 in 2000 to an estimated net worth of $172.5 million by 2015 thanks to his environmentalist activism. Gore and the former chief of Goldman Sachs Asset Management made nearly $218 million in profits between 2008 and 2011 from a carbon trading company they co-founded. By 2008, Gore was able to put a whopping $35 million into hedge funds and other investments.”
Science Fights Back:
Al Gore’s mansion is one of the least energy efficient homes in the United States (Ref.)
Gore accused of massive fraud
There is a growing consensus that Al Gore has perpetrated a massive fraud against the American public, and many believe that he should be held accountable.
From Conservative Base:
“It has been reported that 30,000 scientists, including a top-tier leader of the science community as well as the founder of The Weather Channel, have come forward to sue Al Gore for fraud.
“Al Gore has made massive profits in the promotion of the global warming mythology, and he played a key role in getting the ‘Cap and Trade’ legislation passed. …
“Perhaps this lawsuit will finally give the thousands of ‘dissenting’ scientists a voice again.”
Ten years later, Al Gore needs to finally be exposed for the lies that have made him a very rich man.
Source and references:
NaturalNews.com
DailyCaller.com
Investors.com
DailyCaller.com
MadWorldNews.com
ConservativeBase.com
LiveLeak.com
MacArthur.CharismaNews.com