worldtruthtv--2020-07-03--Apple Execs Now Facing Jail Time For Deliberately Slowing Down iPhones

After a report and subsequent bombshell admission last week by Apple—that they are deliberately slowing down phones in an effort to make them ‘ perform better ’ —lawsuits have sprung up across the nation .
Now , however , in France , Apple executives are facing far more than a potential civil suit , they are facing actual jail time .
In August 2015 , France passed a law that makes it a crime to “ deliberately reduce the lifespan of a product to increase the rate of replacement.
” The aptly named group , Halte à l ’ Obsolescence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , has brought the criminal lawsuit against Apple this week .
If convicted of deliberate planned obsolescence , the tech giant ’ s executives found responsible will be jailed for up to two years and may have to forfeit up to 300,000 euros , and five percent of the firm ’ s annual turnover .
“ Apple has put in place a global strategy of programmed obsolescence in order to boost its sales ” of new iPhones , the group said .
According to the French Newspaper , The Local , HOP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sued over the sale of all iPhones in France since the introduction of a law in August 2015 that made it a crime to “ deliberately reduce the lifespan of a product to increase the rate of replacement.
” It believes Apple could be liable for a fine in line with the value of all its iPhone French sales since the law came into force .
The suit will be heard in a criminal court if prosecutors decide it is legitimate .
“ Everything is organized to force consumers to renew their smartphones @ @ @ @ @ @ @ co-founder of HOP .
“ However , when the phone is priced at 1,200 euros , which is more than the SMIC ( the minimum monthly wage in France ) , these practices are unacceptable and must be punished.
” “ It is our mission to defend consumers and the environment against this waste organized by Apple , ” she said .
As TFTP reported last week , this discussion about throttled processor speed began after a Reddit post went viral earlier this month .
The Redditor wrote that Apple appears to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ batteries .
After this post went viral , Apple was forced to respond and admitted to it .
According to Apple , this deliberate throttling of processor speeds on older phones is an effort to keep them running smoothly .
Apple claims they are slowing down your older iPhone so they can keep your iPhone from unexpectedly shutting down .
The throttling , according to Apple , began last year—despite years of reports from users .
Instead of fixing a hardware issue after users began to report widespread malfunctions with the iPhone 6s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how the phone uses power .
The phone feels slower because it actually is slower .
Apple says this improves safety .
Although Apple says this practice began only last year , if we look at the past 5 years of Google search data , we can see a trend of the search term “ iPhone slow ” —every September—the same month the new iPhones launched .
When reached for comment , Apple basically confirmed the findings but disputes the assumed intention : Our goal is to deliver the best experience for customers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the life of their devices .
Lithium-ion batteries become less capable of supplying peak current demands when in cold conditions , have a low battery charge or as they age over time , which can result in the device unexpectedly shutting down to protect its electronic components .
Last year we released a feature for iPhone 6 , iPhone 6s and iPhone SE to smooth out the instantaneous peaks only when needed to prevent the device from unexpectedly shutting down during these conditions .
We ’ ve now extended that feature to iPhone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to add support for other products in the future .
Instead of telling customers who bought the phones—which cost upwards of $ 850—that they were going to throttle the phone ’ s performance , Apple simply rolled out the update and told no one .
And now , they have the audacity to call this deliberate throttling a “ feature.
” Now , this tech giant has begun damage control and is telling everyone that they had to do this to keep the devices working smoothly .
But this raises the question : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they know will be throttled in upcoming updates and not perform like they expect ?
Instead of dropping the performance of the devices which many of the users are probably still paying for through their cell carriers , Apple should replace the batteries—at no charge .
As CNBC notes , sure it ’ s an expensive undertaking for Apple , but a user should be guaranteed a certain level of performance for the lifetime of a product , until Apple stops supporting it with new software .
However , it appears Apple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most likely because the throttling of older iPhones undoubtedly boosts sales of newer ones .
Instead of offering new batteries for the thousand dollar devices , Apple will now sell you one for $ 29 .
The marketing genius has turned a scandal into a profit and their users will likely eat it up .
While the move to jail Apple execs may sound like a solution , we believe that voting with your dollars is far more effective at forcing change than using the state .
The choice is up to you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ product you know will be deliberately slowed down , or will you refuse to give Apple your money until they make this right ?

Reddit Telegram More Email 299 Shares
After a report and subsequent bombshell admission last week by Apple—that they are deliberately slowing down phones in an effort to make them ‘perform better’—lawsuits have sprung up across the nation. Now, however, in France, Apple executives are facing far more than a potential civil suit, they are facing actual jail time.
In August 2015, France passed a law that makes it a crime to “deliberately reduce the lifespan of a product to increase the rate of replacement.” The aptly named group, Halte à l’Obsolescence Programmée (HOP – Stop Planned Obsolescence), has brought the criminal lawsuit against Apple this week.
If convicted of deliberate planned obsolescence, the tech giant’s executives found responsible will be jailed for up to two years and may have to forfeit up to 300,000 euros, and five percent of the firm’s annual turnover.
“Apple has put in place a global strategy of programmed obsolescence in order to boost its sales” of new iPhones, the group said.
According to the French Newspaper, The Local, HOP believes that the US firm can be sued over the sale of all iPhones in France since the introduction of a law in August 2015 that made it a crime to “deliberately reduce the lifespan of a product to increase the rate of replacement.”
It believes Apple could be liable for a fine in line with the value of all its iPhone French sales since the law came into force.
The suit will be heard in a criminal court if prosecutors decide it is legitimate.
“Everything is organized to force consumers to renew their smartphones,” said Laetitia Vasseur, the co-founder of HOP.
“However, when the phone is priced at 1,200 euros, which is more than the SMIC (the minimum monthly wage in France), these practices are unacceptable and must be punished.”
“It is our mission to defend consumers and the environment against this waste organized by Apple,” she said.
As TFTP reported last week, this discussion about throttled processor speed began after a Reddit post went viral earlier this month. The Redditor wrote that Apple appears to be slowing down old iPhones that have low-capacity batteries. After this post went viral, Apple was forced to respond and admitted to it.
According to Apple, this deliberate throttling of processor speeds on older phones is an effort to keep them running smoothly. Apple claims they are slowing down your older iPhone so they can keep your iPhone from unexpectedly shutting down.
So it’s true Apple intentionally slow down old iPhones. Proof: My iPhone 6 was bought 3years ago and recently got really slow. APP ‘CPU DasherX’ shows iPhone CPU is under clocked running at 600MHz. After a iPhone battery replacement. CPU speed resumed to factory setting 1400MHz. pic.twitter.com/pML3y0Jkp2 — Sam_Si (@sam_siruomu) December 20, 2017
The throttling, according to Apple, began last year—despite years of reports from users. Instead of fixing a hardware issue after users began to report widespread malfunctions with the iPhone 6s battery, Apple started to algorithmically alter how the phone uses power. The phone feels slower because it actually is slower. Apple says this improves safety.
Although Apple says this practice began only last year, if we look at the past 5 years of Google search data, we can see a trend of the search term “iPhone slow”—every September—the same month the new iPhones launched.
When reached for comment, Apple basically confirmed the findings but disputes the assumed intention:
Our goal is to deliver the best experience for customers, which includes overall performance and prolonging the life of their devices. Lithium-ion batteries become less capable of supplying peak current demands when in cold conditions, have a low battery charge or as they age over time, which can result in the device unexpectedly shutting down to protect its electronic components.
Last year we released a feature for iPhone 6, iPhone 6s and iPhone SE to smooth out the instantaneous peaks only when needed to prevent the device from unexpectedly shutting down during these conditions. We’ve now extended that feature to iPhone 7 with iOS 11.2, and plan to add support for other products in the future.
Instead of telling customers who bought the phones—which cost upwards of $850—that they were going to throttle the phone’s performance, Apple simply rolled out the update and told no one. And now, they have the audacity to call this deliberate throttling a “feature.”
Now, this tech giant has begun damage control and is telling everyone that they had to do this to keep the devices working smoothly. But this raises the question: would Apple customers willingly buy a device that they know will be throttled in upcoming updates and not perform like they expect?
Instead of dropping the performance of the devices which many of the users are probably still paying for through their cell carriers, Apple should replace the batteries—at no charge.
As CNBC notes, sure it’s an expensive undertaking for Apple, but a user should be guaranteed a certain level of performance for the lifetime of a product, until Apple stops supporting it with new software.
However, it appears Apple has no intention of doing so, most likely because the throttling of older iPhones undoubtedly boosts sales of newer ones. Instead of offering new batteries for the thousand dollar devices, Apple will now sell you one for $29. The marketing genius has turned a scandal into a profit and their users will likely eat it up.
While the move to jail Apple execs may sound like a solution, we believe that voting with your dollars is far more effective at forcing change than using the state. The choice is up to you, will you continue to buy a product you know will be deliberately slowed down, or will you refuse to give Apple your money until they make this right?
via:
thefreethoughtproject


worldtruthtv--2020-07-03--Why Beautiful Women Marry Less Attractive Men

Women seeking a lifelong mate might do well to choose the guy a notch below them in the looks category .
New research reveals couples in which the wife is better looking than her husband are more positive and supportive than other match-ups .
The reason , researchers suspect , is that men place great value on beauty , whereas women are more interested in having a supportive husband .
Researchers admit that looks are subjective , but studies show there are some universal standards , including large eyes , “ baby face ” features , symmetric faces , so-called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in men versus women .
Past research has shown that individuals with comparable stunning looks are attracted to each other and once they hook up they report greater relationship satisfaction .
These studies , however , are mainly based on new couples , showing that absolute beauty is important in the earliest stages of couple-hood , said lead researcher James McNulty of the University of Tennessee .
But the role of physical attractiveness in well-established partnerships , such as marriage , is somewhat of a mystery .
The new study , published in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Family Psychology , reveals looks continue to matter beyond that initial attraction , though in a different way .
McNulty ’ s team assessed 82 couples who had married within the previous six months and had been together for nearly three years prior to tying the knot .
Participants were on average in their early to mid-20s .
Researchers videotaped as each spouse discussed with their partner a personal problem for 10 minutes .
The tapes were analyzed for whether partners were supportive of spouses ’ issues , which included goals to eat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and to exercise more often .
“ A negative husband would ’ ve said , ‘ This is your problem , you deal with it , ' ” McNulty said , “ versus ‘ Hey , I ’ m here for you ; what do you want me to do ?
; how can I help you ? '
” A group of trained “ coders ” rated the facial attractiveness of each spouse on a scale from 1 to 10 , with the perfect 10 representing the ultimate babe .
About a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attractive wife , a third a more attractive husband and the remaining partners showed matching looks .
Overall , wives and husbands behaved more positively when the woman was better looking .
The finding “ seems very reasonable , ” said Dan Ariely , a professor of behavioral economics at MIT ’ s Program in Media Arts and Sciences and Sloan School of Management .
“ Men are very sensitive to women ’ s attractiveness .
Women seem to be sensitive to men ’ s height and salary , ” said Ariely , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study .
In couples with more attractive husbands , both partners were less supportive of one another .
McNulty suggests wives mirror , in some ways , the level of support they get from husbands .
“ The husband who ’ s less physically attractive than his wife is getting something more than maybe he can expect to get , ” McNulty told LiveScience .
“ He ’ s getting something better than he ’ s providing at that level .
So he ’ s going to work hard to maintain that relationship.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ their partners would theoretically have access to partners who are more attractive than their current spouses , McNulty said .
The “ grass could be greener ” mentality could make these men less satisfied and less committed to maintain the marriage .
Physical attractiveness of husbands is not as important to women , the researchers suggest .
Rather , wives are looking for supportive husbands , they say .
So it seems the mismatch in looks is actually a perfect match .
“ Equitable is unlikely to mean the same on every dimension @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interview .
“ It just means that overall two people make sense together .
”

Reddit Telegram More Email 453 Shares
Women seeking a lifelong mate might do well to choose the guy a notch below them in the looks category. New research reveals couples in which the wife is better looking than her husband are more positive and supportive than other match-ups.
The reason, researchers suspect, is that men place great value on beauty, whereas women are more interested in having a supportive husband.
Researchers admit that looks are subjective, but studies show there are some universal standards, including large eyes, “baby face” features, symmetric faces, so-called average faces, and specific waist-hip ratios in men versus women.
Past research has shown that individuals with comparable stunning looks are attracted to each other and once they hook up they report greater relationship satisfaction. These studies, however, are mainly based on new couples, showing that absolute beauty is important in the earliest stages of couple-hood, said lead researcher James McNulty of the University of Tennessee. But the role of physical attractiveness in well-established partnerships, such as marriage, is somewhat of a mystery.
The new study, published in the February issue of the Journal of Family Psychology, reveals looks continue to matter beyond that initial attraction, though in a different way.
Supportive spouses
McNulty’s team assessed 82 couples who had married within the previous six months and had been together for nearly three years prior to tying the knot. Participants were on average in their early to mid-20s.
Researchers videotaped as each spouse discussed with their partner a personal problem for 10 minutes. The tapes were analyzed for whether partners were supportive of spouses’ issues, which included goals to eat healthier, to land a new job and to exercise more often.
“A negative husband would’ve said, ‘This is your problem, you deal with it,'” McNulty said, “versus ‘Hey, I’m here for you; what do you want me to do?; how can I help you?'”
A group of trained “coders” rated the facial attractiveness of each spouse on a scale from 1 to 10, with the perfect 10 representing the ultimate babe. About a third of the couples had a more attractive wife, a third a more attractive husband and the remaining partners showed matching looks.
Trophy wives
Overall, wives and husbands behaved more positively when the woman was better looking.
The finding “seems very reasonable,” said Dan Ariely, a professor of behavioral economics at MIT’s Program in Media Arts and Sciences and Sloan School of Management. “Men are very sensitive to women’s attractiveness. Women seem to be sensitive to men’s height and salary,” said Ariely, who was not involved in the recent study.
In couples with more attractive husbands, both partners were less supportive of one another. McNulty suggests wives mirror, in some ways, the level of support they get from husbands.
“The husband who’s less physically attractive than his wife is getting something more than maybe he can expect to get,” McNulty told LiveScience. “He’s getting something better than he’s providing at that level. So he’s going to work hard to maintain that relationship.”
Men who are more attractive than their partners would theoretically have access to partners who are more attractive than their current spouses, McNulty said. The “grass could be greener” mentality could make these men less satisfied and less committed to maintain the marriage.
Physical attractiveness of husbands is not as important to women, the researchers suggest. Rather, wives are looking for supportive husbands, they say.
So it seems the mismatch in looks is actually a perfect match. “Equitable is unlikely to mean the same on every dimension,” Ariely said during a telephone interview. “It just means that overall two people make sense together.”
Source:
livescience.com


worldtruthtv--2020-07-02--Could Cucumbers Lead To A Cure For Alzheimer’s

A cucumber-based vaccine that protects against Alzheimer ’ s disease , cat allergies and psoriasis could be in the pipeline , researchers claim .
Scientists believe they have created a ‘ magic bullet ’ by using a virus that normally affects the vegetable in their quest for a cure against several conditions .
They hailed the results of their trial as a breakthrough which could lead to ‘ hundreds of thousands of people being spared the ravages of chronic diseases ’ .
The bizarre technique , proven to work on mice , is also expected to protect against many common @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Scientists at Dundee and Oxford universities used the protein coat of the cucumber mosaic virus – which can cause lumps to appear on the vegetable – for their vaccine .
It was then combined with a protein structure from the tetanus vaccine – which is already known to stimulate the immune system .
The British research team , who published their work in Nature Vaccine , say more trials are required to properly test the vaccines .
What did the results show ?
But Dundee dermatologist Dr John Foerster , who co-led @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ shown positive results in models of psoriasis and cat allergy ’ .
The vaccines can be either preventative – which is the hope for Alzheimer ’ s – but also therapeutic , meaning they could actually cure a disease like psoriasis .
How would it help Alzheimer ’ s ?
In Alzheimer ’ s disease , a protein called beta amyloid collects in the brain and causes brain damage which results in impaired cognitive function .
Previous trials where patients were injected with antibodies against beta amyloid were unsuccessful .
However , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could provide a way of offering treatment even before the disease becomes clinically apparent .
Professor Martin Bachmann , of the Jenner Institute in Oxford , said : ‘ Alzheimer ’ s disease usually develops in elderly people .
‘ The fact that the vaccine described here is optimised for old individuals seems therefore particularly helpful.
’ How would it help psoriasis ?
In psoriasis , a protein called Interleukin 17 needs to be active for the disease to progress , Dr Foerster added .
The vaccine , which stimulates the body to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , may eventually replace expensive injections .
Present antibodies for psoriasis treatment typically need to be injected at least once a month to keep working , and cost around £10,000 per year .
The research showed the technique works in mice , specifically older ones .
Many elderly humans suffer from the conditions tested .
Dr Foerster said : ‘ Since many patients with chronic conditions like psoriasis are elderly this technology may work much better to obtain effective vaccines.
’ The researchers are now looking to begin clinical testing of the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ initiate testing on people .
Women shouldn ’ t use a cucumber as a douche for the vagina – a trend that swept the web , doctors warned earlier this month .
Dubbed the ‘ vagina facial ’ , the odd craze involves inserting the peeled salad staple into your intimate parts before twisting it around for about 20 minutes or longer .
Bloggers claimed the fruit ’ s high vitamin content sanitises your genitals and gives it a pleasant odour , and can even reduce the chances of getting sexually transmitted infections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could actually leave you at a greater risk of infections like gonorrhea and even HIV .
Canadian gynaecologist Dr Jen Gunter said this is because washing with a cucumber upsets the natural pH balance of your intimate bits .
Furthermore , she said that it will in fact cause a bad smell as she warned ‘ if you have a vagina you should definitely not do this ’ .
What do the charities say ?
Louise Walker , research communications officer at Alzheimer ’ s Society , said : ‘ Alzheimer ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenges facing us today .
‘ There is no way at present to stop or slow the progression of the condition .
‘ Therefore it is great to see researchers taking innovative approaches like this , which uses viruses to act as vaccines , to find ways to tackle the challenge.
’ Dr Anjali Mahto , consultant dermatologist and British Skin Foundation spokesperson , said : ‘ Whilst the results are exciting , these vaccines are a long way off from entering daily practice .
‘ Human trials and safety data are needed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the basic science will translate into clinically meaningful patient outcomes .
’

Reddit Telegram More Email 250 Shares
A cucumber-based vaccine that protects against Alzheimer’s disease, cat allergies and psoriasis could be in the pipeline, researchers claim.
Scientists believe they have created a ‘magic bullet’ by using a virus that normally affects the vegetable in their quest for a cure against several conditions.
They hailed the results of their trial as a breakthrough which could lead to ‘hundreds of thousands of people being spared the ravages of chronic diseases’.
The bizarre technique, proven to work on mice, is also expected to protect against many common allergies and even types of chronic pain.
Scientists at Dundee and Oxford universities used the protein coat of the cucumber mosaic virus – which can cause lumps to appear on the vegetable – for their vaccine.
It was then combined with a protein structure from the tetanus vaccine – which is already known to stimulate the immune system.
The British research team, who published their work in Nature Vaccine, say more trials are required to properly test the vaccines.
What did the results show?
But Dundee dermatologist Dr John Foerster, who co-led the research, said they had already ‘shown positive results in models of psoriasis and cat allergy’.
The vaccines can be either preventative – which is the hope for Alzheimer’s – but also therapeutic, meaning they could actually cure a disease like psoriasis.
How would it help Alzheimer’s?
In Alzheimer’s disease, a protein called beta amyloid collects in the brain and causes brain damage which results in impaired cognitive function.
Previous trials where patients were injected with antibodies against beta amyloid were unsuccessful.
However, the new study suggests that prophylactic vaccines could provide a way of offering treatment even before the disease becomes clinically apparent.
Professor Martin Bachmann, of the Jenner Institute in Oxford, said: ‘Alzheimer’s disease usually develops in elderly people.
‘The fact that the vaccine described here is optimised for old individuals seems therefore particularly helpful.’
How would it help psoriasis?
In psoriasis, a protein called Interleukin 17 needs to be active for the disease to progress, Dr Foerster added.
The vaccine, which stimulates the body to make antibodies to turn off the protein, may eventually replace expensive injections.
Present antibodies for psoriasis treatment typically need to be injected at least once a month to keep working, and cost around £10,000 per year.
The research showed the technique works in mice, specifically older ones. Many elderly humans suffer from the conditions tested.
Dr Foerster said: ‘Since many patients with chronic conditions like psoriasis are elderly this technology may work much better to obtain effective vaccines.’
The researchers are now looking to begin clinical testing of the vaccine and have already received regulatory approval to initiate testing on people.
CUCUMBER WARNING FOR WOMEN…
Women shouldn’t use a cucumber as a douche for the vagina – a trend that swept the web, doctors warned earlier this month. Dubbed the ‘vagina facial’, the odd craze involves inserting the peeled salad staple into your intimate parts before twisting it around for about 20 minutes or longer. Bloggers claimed the fruit’s high vitamin content sanitises your genitals and gives it a pleasant odour, and can even reduce the chances of getting sexually transmitted infections. But an expert warned the practice could actually leave you at a greater risk of infections like gonorrhea and even HIV. Canadian gynaecologist Dr Jen Gunter said this is because washing with a cucumber upsets the natural pH balance of your intimate bits. Furthermore, she said that it will in fact cause a bad smell as she warned ‘if you have a vagina you should definitely not do this’.
What do the charities say?
Louise Walker, research communications officer at Alzheimer’s Society, said: ‘Alzheimer’s disease is one of the biggest health challenges facing us today.
‘There is no way at present to stop or slow the progression of the condition.
‘Therefore it is great to see researchers taking innovative approaches like this, which uses viruses to act as vaccines, to find ways to tackle the challenge.’
Dr Anjali Mahto, consultant dermatologist and British Skin Foundation spokesperson, said: ‘Whilst the results are exciting, these vaccines are a long way off from entering daily practice.
‘Human trials and safety data are needed before we can say for certain that the basic science will translate into clinically meaningful patient outcomes.’


worldtruthtv--2020-07-01--Natasha Demkina – The Girl With X-Ray Vision

Born in Saransk , Russia in 1987 Natasha Demkina ( Natalya Nikolayevna Demkina ) at the age of ten developed a strange vision .
She could see inside a human body .
This happened after Natasha was operated for her appendix .
“ I was at home with my mother and suddenly I had a vision .
I could see inside my mother ’ s body and I started telling her about the organs I could see .
Now , I have to switch from my regular vision to what I call medical vision .
For a fraction of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inside the person and then I start to analyze It.
” says Demkina .
After this Natasha ’ s story started spreading in the neighborhood .
People began gathering outside her house to figure out their sicknesses .
On hearing her stories , doctors in her hometown decided to put her to test .
Natasha was taken to a local children hospital where she correctly diagnosed the children .
She used pictures to show the doctors .
She showed one of the doctors a picture of his stomach with something in it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vision she also corrected a wrong diagnosis made by the doctors about a lady who was said to be suffering from cancer .
Natasha examined her and said that it was just a small cyst and not cancer .
After several examinations it was revealed that the woman indeed did not have cancer .
Stories of Natasha reached UK through the newspaper , The Sun .
In 2004 Natasha was brought to UK to test her vision .
Natasha could locate the injuries of a person who had a car accident a year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a resident doctor Chris Steele of This Morning TV show .
She correctly told him about the operations he had undergone and then told him that he was suffering from gall stones , kidney stones , enlarged pancreas and enlarged liver .
Immediately the doctor went for a scan to find that all the diagnosis made by Natasha were accurate .
He found that he had a tumor in his intestines , but was not life threatening .
The Discovery Channel then decided to test her in New York .
There were seven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ five .
Natasha could diagnose only four and was told that she had failed the test .
This experiment remains a controversy till date .
Later she was tested by Professor Yoshio Machi from the Department of Electronics at Tokyo Denki University .
After setting a few ground rules for the tests Natasha was successful in passing .
She could locate a prosthetic knee and discovered that a woman was pregnant .
Later Natasha also started charging patients for diagnosis .
Since January 2006 , Demkina is working for the Center of Special @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , whose stated purpose is to diagnose and treat illness in cooperation with “ experts possessing unusual abilities , folk healers and professionals of traditional medicine .
Natasha Demkina still remains a controversial subject .

Reddit Telegram More Email 237 Shares
Born in Saransk, Russia in 1987 Natasha Demkina (Natalya Nikolayevna Demkina) at the age of ten developed a strange vision. She could see inside a human body. This happened after Natasha was operated for her appendix.
“I was at home with my mother and suddenly I had a vision. I could see inside my mother’s body and I started telling her about the organs I could see. Now, I have to switch from my regular vision to what I call medical vision. For a fraction of a second, I see a colorful picture inside the person and then I start to analyze It.” says Demkina.
After this Natasha’s story started spreading in the neighborhood. People began gathering outside her house to figure out their sicknesses. On hearing her stories, doctors in her hometown decided to put her to test. Natasha was taken to a local children hospital where she correctly diagnosed the children. She used pictures to show the doctors. She showed one of the doctors a picture of his stomach with something in it. That was his ulcer.
Using her vision she also corrected a wrong diagnosis made by the doctors about a lady who was said to be suffering from cancer. Natasha examined her and said that it was just a small cyst and not cancer. After several examinations it was revealed that the woman indeed did not have cancer.
Stories of Natasha reached UK through the newspaper, The Sun. In 2004 Natasha was brought to UK to test her vision. Natasha could locate the injuries of a person who had a car accident a year before. In England she also examined a resident doctor Chris Steele of This Morning TV show. She correctly told him about the operations he had undergone and then told him that he was suffering from gall stones, kidney stones, enlarged pancreas and enlarged liver. Immediately the doctor went for a scan to find that all the diagnosis made by Natasha were accurate. He found that he had a tumor in his intestines, but was not life threatening.
The Discovery Channel then decided to test her in New York. There were seven patients and Natasha had to diagnose any five. Natasha could diagnose only four and was told that she had failed the test. This experiment remains a controversy till date. Later she was tested by Professor Yoshio Machi from the Department of Electronics at Tokyo Denki University. After setting a few ground rules for the tests Natasha was successful in passing. She could locate a prosthetic knee and discovered that a woman was pregnant.
Later Natasha also started charging patients for diagnosis. Since January 2006, Demkina is working for the Center of Special Diagnostics of the Natalya Demkina (TSSD), whose stated purpose is to diagnose and treat illness in cooperation with “experts possessing unusual abilities, folk healers and professionals of traditional medicine. Natasha Demkina still remains a controversial subject.
Source:
mysteriousfacts.com


worldtruthtv--2020-07-01--South African Whites Only Town To Launch Digital Currency For Whites

The infamous Whites-only town of Orania in northern Cape Town , South Africa , is set to launch a digital currency that will only be used within the town .
Orania , which is estimated to have a population 1,300 people , already uses a local currency known as the “ ora , ” which is printed by the town ’ s own chamber of commerce and distributed through the central bank , according to CNN .
The digital version of the currency , which will be accessible via a mobile app , is expected to replace ora notes that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ African rand and expire after three years .
With the new app , users will be able to purchase “ E-Ora ” from the central bank and trade it with one another and local businesses via their smartphones .
The digital currency won ’ t have an expiration date .
Residents of Orania , the whites-only town in South Africa .
Coordinators of the project say the new currency is intended to further Orania ’ s independence , with some residents even aspiring to have an independent Orania state .
They say the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in making everyday business transactions more efficient while saving the town the cost of printing currency notes .
Trading digital currencies between smartphones will also help to eliminate fees that apply to certain credit card transactions .
“ It is basically electronic cash that will be moved from wallet to wallet with every transaction without the commercial banks standing in the middle , ” says Peter Krige , a coordinator of the project .
“ In this way , friction and cost is removed from the transaction .
Both consumers and retailers will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transaction.
” The currency , which could be in circulation within a year , is a partnership between the Afrikaner town and award-winning economist Dawie Roodt , who says he is aware that working with Orania is controversial but the opportunity was too exciting to turn down .
“ Where else is there an opportunity for an economist to do an experiment like this ?
This is like a petri dish…I want to see what environment is created by digital currency , ” Roodt says , adding that if the project is successful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ communities within South Africa .
Orania town is often described as the remains of Apartheid , a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination in South Africa that existed between 1948 and 1991 .
Critics accuse the town ’ s authorities of rejecting the Rainbow Nation concept and trying to recreate pre-democratic South Africa within a territory .
But residents of the town contend that their desire to isolate themselves is motivated by the need to preserve their linguistic and cultural heritage and protect themselves from the high rate of crime in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ living in Orania are Afrikaans , a South African language derived from the form of Dutch brought to the country by Protestant settlers in the 17th century .

Reddit Telegram More Email 305 Shares
A woman holding Ora notes in Orania, South Africa.
The infamous Whites-only town of Orania in northern Cape Town, South Africa, is set to launch a digital currency that will only be used within the town.
Orania, which is estimated to have a population 1,300 people, already uses a local currency known as the “ora,” which is printed by the town’s own chamber of commerce and distributed through the central bank, according to CNN.
The digital version of the currency, which will be accessible via a mobile app, is expected to replace ora notes that are technically vouchers pegged to the South African rand and expire after three years.
With the new app, users will be able to purchase “E-Ora” from the central bank and trade it with one another and local businesses via their smartphones. The digital currency won’t have an expiration date.
Deepening Racial Segregation
Residents of Orania, the whites-only town in South Africa.
Coordinators of the project say the new currency is intended to further Orania’s independence, with some residents even aspiring to have an independent Orania state.
They say the digital currency will go a long way in making everyday business transactions more efficient while saving the town the cost of printing currency notes.
Trading digital currencies between smartphones will also help to eliminate fees that apply to certain credit card transactions.
“It is basically electronic cash that will be moved from wallet to wallet with every transaction without the commercial banks standing in the middle,” says Peter Krige, a coordinator of the project.
“In this way, friction and cost is removed from the transaction. Both consumers and retailers will save between three and five percent per transaction.”
The currency, which could be in circulation within a year, is a partnership between the Afrikaner town and award-winning economist Dawie Roodt, who says he is aware that working with Orania is controversial but the opportunity was too exciting to turn down.
“Where else is there an opportunity for an economist to do an experiment like this? This is like a petri dish…I want to see what environment is created by digital currency,” Roodt says, adding that if the project is successful, he will introduce it to other communities within South Africa.
Post-Colonial Segregation
Orania town is often described as the remains of Apartheid, a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination in South Africa that existed between 1948 and 1991.
Critics accuse the town’s authorities of rejecting the Rainbow Nation concept and trying to recreate pre-democratic South Africa within a territory.
But residents of the town contend that their desire to isolate themselves is motivated by the need to preserve their linguistic and cultural heritage and protect themselves from the high rate of crime in the country.
The majority of the people living in Orania are Afrikaans, a South African language derived from the form of Dutch brought to the country by Protestant settlers in the 17th century.


worldtruthtv--2020-07-03--Cannabis Cures Cancer and The Government Has Known Since 1974

Cannabis is labeled by the US Government as a Schedule 1 Narcotic , meaning little to no known medical value .
( Even though the US Govt holds patents that state otherwise ) Marinol , which is APPROVED BY THE FDA , is synthesized THC .
Millions of people are sitting in jail for using Cannabis raw , but it ’ s ‘ perfectly fine ’ to use the plant if the Government and their corporate owners take most of the medicine out of it , then get to charge you an arm and a leg for it .
Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The US Government is well aware Cannabis has medicinal properties .
How could they not ?
It ’ s been used as a medicine for at least the past 10,000 years .
Even in America , Cannabis was used as a medicine for over 100 years .
It was in over a hundred over the counter medicines for a wide range of reasons .
Everything from pain and nausea medication to sleeping tonics .
Among the reasons you will learn about on the link I shared above , the US Government has even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If Cannabis were to become legalized , it would eat away at TRILLIONS of pharmaceutical profits over the years .
( Not including other profits like the billions they get for keeping our privately owned prisons full . )
What most people don ’ t realize is , the Government ( s ) have been helping the major pharmaceutical companies stonewall natural cures for decades .
In fact , the US Government has known since 1974 that Cannabis cures Cancer .
In 1972 Richard Nixon wanted a larger budget for his war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he proved Cannabis caused lung cancer like cigarettes do , he would get the support he needed .
He gave the Medical College of Virginia 2 years to do a study on the effects of Cannabinoids ( such as THC and CBD ) on the body .
In ’ 74 the study was completed .
It turns out , when ingested in highly concentrated forms ( such as eating Cannabis oil ) the Cannabinoids in the oil will attack any mutated cells in your body while strengthening and rejuvenating the healthy cells .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cancer !
It worked fast , it worked well , it worked on many different forms of Cancer in ALL stages and it had ZERO harmful side effects .
( Unlike Chemo which deteriorates your entire body and kills 1 in 5 patients .
Not only that , but other research shows it dissolves ALL forms of tumors and can even combat super-bugs like MRSA . )
When Richard Nixon saw the results of the study he was FURIOUS .
He threw the entire report in the trash and deemed the study classified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an end to all public cannabis research and granted exclusive research rights to major pharmaceutical companies , who set out — unsuccessfully — to develop synthetic forms of THC that would deliver all the medical benefits without the “ high.
” We only found out about the study a few years ago thanks to dedicated medical and law professionals who filed Freedom of Information Requests .
The Government lied for many reasons.. One of the main reasons is Pharmaceutical Companies .
They spend billions every year lobbying to keep Cannabis illegal because they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They are already well aware that Cannabis cures Cancer .
They have a well thought out con going at the moment .
Cancer patients and their loved ones will spend their entire life savings or even sell their houses and businesses in order to pay for Chemotherapy and other Cancer treatment drugs .
A lot of the time they spend all that money and their loved one dies anyway .
If the public found out that the Government has been lying for over 40 years , that MILLIONS of lives could have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grow the cure they so desperately need in their own backyard… We all know the American public would be going nuts over it .
Here is an article about what they did if you ’ d like to read more , as well as an article about more suppressed research .
Cannabis Cures Cancer- US Government has known since 1974 22 .
U.S. Government Repressed Marijuana-Tumor Research Keep in mind..
The US Government also holds a Patent on Cannabis and it ’ s medicinal properties .
US Patent 6630507 states unequivocally that cannabinoids @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a wide variety of diseases including auto-immune disorders , stroke , trauma , Parkinson ’ s , Alzheimer ’ s and HIV dementia .
The patent , awarded in 2003 , is based on research done by the National Institute of Health , and is assigned to the US Dept .
of Health and Human Services .
In the age of information , they can no longer keep their lies about Cannabis afloat .
In case you are wondering the difference between a few things like Hemp oil and Cannabis oil , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ too .
THC , CBD and other Cannabinoids are soluble in alcohol and fats only .
This is why people saute it in butter and use it in things like cakes and cookies .
You can make Cannabis Ghee ( which is essentially Canna-butter ) and use it how you would normally use butter in a recipe .
Cannabis oil is made by crushing raw Cannabis in grain alcohol ( as close to 100 % as possible ) , straining it and cooking off the alcohol VERY carefully .
All you will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ in highly concentrated form .
Hemp oil is made by cold-pressing the seeds of the Hemp plant and extracting the healthy oil within .
It is used for things like food and fuel , but it will not cure cancer because it lacks THC .
( Hence the reason it ’ s legal to buy at places like Trader Joe ’ s ) Now , I realize how badly some people are going to want to get their hands on Cannabis oil for their suffering loved ones .
I ’ m sorry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can get the oil is from Cannabis dispensaries in areas where it is sold legally .
Otherwise you have to make it yourself which can be highly complicated and even dangerous since you have to worry about alcohol fumes and legal repercussions if you get caught .
( Here ’ s a video that shows you how ) Still , in my opinion it is well worth the risks since it has already saved THOUSANDS of people ( and pets ) from horrible deaths due to diseases like Cancer .
If you would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subject , type ‘ Cannabis cured my cancer ’ or ‘ Cannabis cures Cancer ’ into YouTube search .
When you do , you will see how many people are trying to get the word out about this AMAZING cure .
If you would like info on other ways to use Cannabis , here are a few examples .
Raw Cannabis Juice , Cannabis Salve , Cannabis Ghee , Cannabis Tincture , and Grain Alcohol Extraction ( aka the Cannabis oil that I mentioned above ) .
Here is a video on how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you can not make it yourself , I invite you to check out Elixinol .
It is Cannabis oil but very low THC , very high CBD .
Therefore , through this little loophole of not having much THC , it can be ordered online , LEGALLY .
Please help us spread the word !
Share as far and wide as you can !

Reddit Telegram More Email 21K Shares
Cannabis is labeled by the US Government as a Schedule 1 Narcotic, meaning little to no known medical value. (Even though the US Govt holds patents that state otherwise) Marinol, which is APPROVED BY THE FDA, is synthesized THC.
Millions of people are sitting in jail for using Cannabis raw, but it’s ‘perfectly fine’ to use the plant if the Government and their corporate owners take most of the medicine out of it, then get to charge you an arm and a leg for it. Why is that? I shall explain.
The US Government is well aware Cannabis has medicinal properties. How could they not? It’s been used as a medicine for at least the past 10,000 years. Even in America, Cannabis was used as a medicine for over 100 years. It was in over a hundred over the counter medicines for a wide range of reasons. Everything from pain and nausea medication to sleeping tonics.
Among the reasons you will learn about on the link I shared above, the US Government has even more reason to keep it illegal today. If Cannabis were to become legalized, it would eat away at TRILLIONS of pharmaceutical profits over the years. (Not including other profits like the billions they get for keeping our privately owned prisons full.)
What most people don’t realize is, the Government(s) have been helping the major pharmaceutical companies stonewall natural cures for decades. In fact, the US Government has known since 1974 that Cannabis cures Cancer. In 1972 Richard Nixon wanted a larger budget for his war on drugs.
He thought that if he proved Cannabis caused lung cancer like cigarettes do, he would get the support he needed. He gave the Medical College of Virginia 2 years to do a study on the effects of Cannabinoids (such as THC and CBD) on the body.
In ’74 the study was completed. It turns out, when ingested in highly concentrated forms (such as eating Cannabis oil) the Cannabinoids in the oil will attack any mutated cells in your body while strengthening and rejuvenating the healthy cells. They accidentally found the PERFECT cure for Cancer!
It worked fast, it worked well, it worked on many different forms of Cancer in ALL stages and it had ZERO harmful side effects. (Unlike Chemo which deteriorates your entire body and kills 1 in 5 patients. Not only that, but other research shows it dissolves ALL forms of tumors and can even combat super-bugs like MRSA.)
When Richard Nixon saw the results of the study he was FURIOUS. He threw the entire report in the trash and deemed the study classified. In 1976 President Gerald Ford put an end to all public cannabis research and granted exclusive research rights to major pharmaceutical companies, who set out — unsuccessfully — to develop synthetic forms of THC that would deliver all the medical benefits without the “high.”
We only found out about the study a few years ago thanks to dedicated medical and law professionals who filed Freedom of Information Requests. The Government lied for many reasons.. One of the main reasons is Pharmaceutical Companies. They spend billions every year lobbying to keep Cannabis illegal because they make TRILLIONS off Cancer drugs and research. They are already well aware that Cannabis cures Cancer. They have a well thought out con going at the moment.
Cancer patients and their loved ones will spend their entire life savings or even sell their houses and businesses in order to pay for Chemotherapy and other Cancer treatment drugs. A lot of the time they spend all that money and their loved one dies anyway. If the public found out that the Government has been lying for over 40 years, that MILLIONS of lives could have been saved and that the dying could grow the cure they so desperately need in their own backyard… We all know the American public would be going nuts over it.
Here is an article about what they did if you’d like to read more, as well as an article about more suppressed research. Cannabis Cures Cancer- US Government has known since 1974 22. U.S. Government Repressed Marijuana-Tumor Research
Keep in mind.. The US Government also holds a Patent on Cannabis and it’s medicinal properties. US Patent 6630507 states unequivocally that cannabinoids are useful in the prevention and treatment of a wide variety of diseases including auto-immune disorders, stroke, trauma, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and HIV dementia. The patent, awarded in 2003, is based on research done by the National Institute of Health, and is assigned to the US Dept. of Health and Human Services. In the age of information, they can no longer keep their lies about Cannabis afloat.
SHARE THIS INFORMATION EVERYWHERE!!
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
In case you are wondering the difference between a few things like Hemp oil and Cannabis oil, I figured I’d explain that too. THC, CBD and other Cannabinoids are soluble in alcohol and fats only. This is why people saute it in butter and use it in things like cakes and cookies. You can make Cannabis Ghee (which is essentially Canna-butter) and use it how you would normally use butter in a recipe.
Cannabis oil is made by crushing raw Cannabis in grain alcohol (as close to 100% as possible), straining it and cooking off the alcohol VERY carefully. All you will be left with is essentially ‘pure medicine’ in highly concentrated form.
Hemp oil is made by cold-pressing the seeds of the Hemp plant and extracting the healthy oil within. It is used for things like food and fuel, but it will not cure cancer because it lacks THC. (Hence the reason it’s legal to buy at places like Trader Joe’s)
Now, I realize how badly some people are going to want to get their hands on Cannabis oil for their suffering loved ones. I’m sorry to say, the only place you can get the oil is from Cannabis dispensaries in areas where it is sold legally. Otherwise you have to make it yourself which can be highly complicated and even dangerous since you have to worry about alcohol fumes and legal repercussions if you get caught. (Here’s a video that shows you how)
Still, in my opinion it is well worth the risks since it has already saved THOUSANDS of people (and pets) from horrible deaths due to diseases like Cancer. If you would like to hear many testimonies on the subject, type ‘Cannabis cured my cancer’ or ‘Cannabis cures Cancer’ into YouTube search. When you do, you will see how many people are trying to get the word out about this AMAZING cure.
If you would like info on other ways to use Cannabis, here are a few examples.
Raw Cannabis Juice, Cannabis Salve, Cannabis Ghee, Cannabis Tincture, and Grain Alcohol Extraction (aka the Cannabis oil that I mentioned above).
Here is a video on how to make the oil yourself. If you cannot make it yourself, I invite you to check out Elixinol. It is Cannabis oil but very low THC, very high CBD. Therefore, through this little loophole of not having much THC, it can be ordered online, LEGALLY.
Please help us spread the word! Share as far and wide as you can!
source:
thespiritscience.net


worldtruthtv--2020-07-03--Lockdowns Were A Scam: Asymptomatic Carriers Don’t Spread COVID-19

The whole purpose ( supposedly ) of the lockdowns was to keep those healthy people who had COVID-19 from spreading it when they didn ’ t have symptoms .
The entire planet was terrified of healthy human beings , so governments locked down entire swaths of the population without much evidence whatsoever .
Now , the WHO ( World Health Organization ) has said that those scary healthy people who are infected but have no symptoms are not likely to spread the virus .
Mad yet ?
If not , you should be .
This was all done to usher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aren ’ t done playing with us yet .
Some Americans , still haven ’ t had enough .
There are people literally still wearing masks and gloves in the summer heat while others cry for martial law to stop George Soros band of looters and thugs .
And it ’ s all being done for the same reason : the New World Order must happen .
If we expect to stop it , we need to realize first what ’ s been done to us .
The entire shutdown was proven to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media and government officials are not giving up on the official narrative that we should all “ fear the second wave.
” Articles are all over the place parroting fearmongering comments from experts ( the same experts that locked us in our homes and put us on house arrest over a virus that was less damaging than the flu if you ’ re a healthy person ) that we should be prepared for yet another lockdown .
The powers-that-should-not-be are not done toying with us just yet and Americans are not done falling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ either .
Martial law is necessary to complete the global takeover and far too many Americans have fallen in line DEMANDING that come to fruition .
Since coming out and saying asymptomatic people rarely spread COVID-19 , the WHO said there ’ s a “ misunderstanding , ” and intend to toe the line using fear to keep people in a panicked state of dependency on the state for a false sense of safety .

Reddit Telegram More Email 3K Shares
The whole purpose (supposedly) of the lockdowns was to keep those healthy people who had COVID-19 from spreading it when they didn’t have symptoms.
The entire planet was terrified of healthy human beings, so governments locked down entire swaths of the population without much evidence whatsoever.
Now, the WHO (World Health Organization) has said that those scary healthy people who are infected but have no symptoms are not likely to spread the virus.
Mad yet? If not, you should be. This was all done to usher in the New World Order and they aren’t done playing with us yet.
Some Americans, still haven’t had enough. There are people literally still wearing masks and gloves in the summer heat while others cry for martial law to stop George Soros band of looters and thugs.
And it’s all being done for the same reason: the New World Order must happen. If we expect to stop it, we need to realize first what’s been done to us.
The entire shutdown was proven to be a hoax, yet the mainstream media and government officials are not giving up on the official narrative that we should all “fear the second wave.”
Articles are all over the place parroting fearmongering comments from experts (the same experts that locked us in our homes and put us on house arrest over a virus that was less damaging than the flu if you’re a healthy person) that we should be prepared for yet another lockdown.
The powers-that-should-not-be are not done toying with us just yet and Americans are not done falling for the lies and propaganda just yet either.
Martial law is necessary to complete the global takeover and far too many Americans have fallen in line DEMANDING that come to fruition.
Since coming out and saying asymptomatic people rarely spread COVID-19, the WHO said there’s a “misunderstanding,” and intend to toe the line using fear to keep people in a panicked state of dependency on the state for a false sense of safety.


worldtruthtv--2020-07-03--Someone Conducted A Study To See If Someone From The Future Was Here Present In Our Time – Here’s Wh

Someone Conducted A Study To See If Someone From The Future Was Here Present In Our Time – Here’s What They Found

Did you know that there was a study conducted to see if someone from the future was here present in our time ?
Yes , it ’ s true !
Astrophysicists – Robert Nemiroff and Teresa Wilson at Michigan Tech University did just that as reported in 2014 .
They figured that if someone from the future traveled back to our time , there may be trace evidence .
Someone may have done internet searches of future events .
The search dates would have been prior to the events and would stand out that way .
Enough of them traced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of advanced knowledge .
After exhausting their funds , the results of that study remained inconclusive .
However , in response to a question posted on one website asking : “ Do you believe communication through time would be possible ?
” I replied that “ I believe it has already happened.
” Only because I believe that our near future thinkers will be quantum computers with artificial intelligence .
I believe that not only would they be able to figure it out , but man has figured it out already .
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be impossible is already proven science fact .
So although this is complicated , I ’ ll simplify what ’ s involved for you .
Hopefully the science behind it will become easy to understand .
Now I want you to keep in mind that it concerns faster than light communication called “ superluminal ” which Einstein dismissed as impossible .
Although being one of the discoverers of this phenomena he dismissed it because it violated his own speed limit of light .
According to Einstein , nothing in the universe could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also violates another law called “ causality.
” The law of causality simply means that any event must have a cause and the cause must happen before the event .
As an example , I often use a glass of milk : I drop a glass of milk , it falls to the floor and breaks , spilling the milk .
Then you see and hear it fall from the cause of me dropping it in the first place .
You could never see it break before I dropped it because time as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future .
This is called the arrow of time or “ Eddington ’ s Arrow ” named after Sir Arthur Eddington who coined the phrase in 1927 .
It drops , falls to the floor , it breaks and then you see it .
All one straight line from the past to the future.But many paranormal phenomena like supernatural abilities which many throughout history have claimed to possess are based on violating these laws .
ESP , telekinesis , precognition and many other psi abilities do just that .
Many famous psychics like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his body to retrieve information from the Akashic Record which goes by many other names .
Some call it the Astral Planes , The Book of Life , universal consciousness , collective consciousness , etc… It is what some believe makes psychic abilities possible .
According to Akashic Records theory , information has no time or distance barrier .
Non-local or universal information resides outside of the mind where it is always available and can be tuned into like a radio .
With some people like psychics it ’ s a natural right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ majority left brain it may be something that can be learned .
Although mainstream scientists reject all of these claims as fake or pseudo-science .
For people like Edgar Cayce , Nostradamus and others alternative explanations like trickery , fraud and coincidence are the usual suspects .
Now , a funny thing happened on the way to the witch and it ’ s been happening more frequently lately .
It started with atoms and accidents and now it ’ s routinely done on purpose .
Once again peering down into subatomic particles is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impossible but approaching it from different directions .
Scientists have long noticed strange things going on with atoms , electrons and even now with larger molecule experiments .
What Einstein used to call “ spooky action at a distance , ” is now routine .
If you follow me I won ’ t go into depth and it ’ s really very simple .
Say you have a molecule that consists of two atoms and each has one electron .
Well , these electrons are spinning .
One is spinning upward so the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the opposite direction or downward .
That ’ s the way it works because they are from the same molecule .
In quantum physics they call this “ entangled ” meaning they will always be connected .
The “ spooky action ” comes in when you pull them apart .
We ’ ll pull them apart in our minds but there are many methods in the real world to do this .
Now , by taking a measurement of one electron we will destroy it , but we will know which direction it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instantly tells us the direction the other is spinning without measuring it because they are a pair or connected ( entangled ) .
What ’ s weird is that we can separate them and put one in another room or even across town and it will still work .
This is called wave collapse because by measuring one the spin direction of the other collapses to the exact opposite .
So what if we separated them by a hundred miles ?
The truth is , we could separate them by a million miles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as we measure one it collapses the wave and the other one becomes fixed .
So , measure the one in front of you and the other one instantly spins in the opposite direction .
See that ’ s the problem Einstein had with it .
The electrons communicate faster than light .
One light year away it should have taken at least a year to communicate with the other electron , right ?
What does all this have to do with communication from the future ?
Well , it has to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out and they ’ ve done it !
Through entanglement not only can you separate electrons by distance but by time .
Then , you can perform the same experiment in a different way and the electron you measure in the future will communicate back in time .
Measure the spin next year and the one you have separated in front of you will collapse today to the exact opposite spin before you ’ ve even taken the measurement .
Since this is supposed to be an easy article to understand , let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than how it ’ s done .
It ’ s easy to understand but the article would have to be twice as long .
There are different techniques with some straight forward and others overly involved .
Creating what they call qubits is one way which is short for quantum bits and is a little more involved but I only mention it for anyone who wants to investigate this further .
Up until recently it was believed that any of this was useless because it couldn ’ t be used to transfer information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now believed that by setting up a coding system , communicating through binary is theoretically possible .
So in theory I could send you next year ’ s newspaper headline back through time as binary .
This is all in the early stages , but the science is solid .
Entangled particles like electrons communicate not only faster than light , they also break the time barrier .
One current theory is that the electrons communicate bypassing our space time dimension completely .
This is HUGE – it opens up not only communication @ @ @ @ @ @ @ computers from the future may already be communicating with one another back through the internet and back through time .
So , the original study at Michigan Technology may have actually been ahead of its time or behind its time or something that we may figure out or already have and don ’ t know it yet or whatever .
This article was written using concepts from the non-fiction book “ Sin Thesis ” available at Amazon written by the author Robert Torres .

Reddit Telegram More Email 373 Shares
Did you know that there was a study conducted to see if someone from the future was here present in our time? Yes, it’s true! Astrophysicists – Robert Nemiroff and Teresa Wilson at Michigan Tech University did just that as reported in 2014. They figured that if someone from the future traveled back to our time, there may be trace evidence. Someone may have done internet searches of future events. The search dates would have been prior to the events and would stand out that way. Enough of them traced to one user would reveal a pattern of advanced knowledge.
After exhausting their funds, the results of that study remained inconclusive. However, in response to a question posted on one website asking: “Do you believe communication through time would be possible?” I replied that “I believe it has already happened.” Only because I believe that our near future thinkers will be quantum computers with artificial intelligence. I believe that not only would they be able to figure it out, but man has figured it out already.
What? Yes, what we once believed to be impossible is already proven science fact. So although this is complicated, I’ll simplify what’s involved for you. Hopefully the science behind it will become easy to understand. Now I want you to keep in mind that it concerns faster than light communication called “superluminal” which Einstein dismissed as impossible. Although being one of the discoverers of this phenomena he dismissed it because it violated his own speed limit of light. According to Einstein, nothing in the universe could travel faster. Communication through time however also violates another law called “causality.” The law of causality simply means that any event must have a cause and the cause must happen before the event.
As an example, I often use a glass of milk: I drop a glass of milk, it falls to the floor and breaks, spilling the milk. Then you see and hear it fall from the cause of me dropping it in the first place.
You could never see it break before I dropped it because time as we experience it occurs from past to future. This is called the arrow of time or “Eddington’s Arrow” named after Sir Arthur Eddington who coined the phrase in 1927. It drops, falls to the floor, it breaks and then you see it. All one straight line from the past to the future.But many paranormal phenomena like supernatural abilities which many throughout history have claimed to possess are based on violating these laws. ESP, telekinesis, precognition and many other psi abilities do just that. Many famous psychics like the late Edgar Cayce claimed to leave his body to retrieve information from the Akashic Record which goes by many other names. Some call it the Astral Planes, The Book of Life, universal consciousness, collective consciousness, etc… It is what some believe makes psychic abilities possible.
According to Akashic Records theory, information has no time or distance barrier. Non-local or universal information resides outside of the mind where it is always available and can be tuned into like a radio. With some people like psychics it’s a natural right brain activity and with the population being majority left brain it may be something that can be learned. Although mainstream scientists reject all of these claims as fake or pseudo-science. For people like Edgar Cayce, Nostradamus and others alternative explanations like trickery, fraud and coincidence are the usual suspects.
Now, a funny thing happened on the way to the witch and it’s been happening more frequently lately. It started with atoms and accidents and now it’s routinely done on purpose. Once again peering down into subatomic particles is bringing two worlds together. Believing the impossible but approaching it from different directions.
Scientists have long noticed strange things going on with atoms, electrons and even now with larger molecule experiments. What Einstein used to call “spooky action at a distance,” is now routine. If you follow me I won’t go into depth and it’s really very simple. Say you have a molecule that consists of two atoms and each has one electron. Well, these electrons are spinning. One is spinning upward so the other electron has to be spinning in the opposite direction or downward. That’s the way it works because they are from the same molecule. In quantum physics they call this “entangled” meaning they will always be connected. The “spooky action” comes in when you pull them apart.
We’ll pull them apart in our minds but there are many methods in the real world to do this. Now, by taking a measurement of one electron we will destroy it, but we will know which direction it spins. Knowing which way it spins instantly tells us the direction the other is spinning without measuring it because they are a pair or connected (entangled). What’s weird is that we can separate them and put one in another room or even across town and it will still work. This is called wave collapse because by measuring one the spin direction of the other collapses to the exact opposite.
So what if we separated them by a hundred miles? The truth is, we could separate them by a million miles or a light year and as soon as we measure one it collapses the wave and the other one becomes fixed. So, measure the one in front of you and the other one instantly spins in the opposite direction. See that’s the problem Einstein had with it. The electrons communicate faster than light. One light year away it should have taken at least a year to communicate with the other electron, right?
What does all this have to do with communication from the future? Well, it has to do with the beginnings of figuring it all out and they’ve done it! Through entanglement not only can you separate electrons by distance but by time. Then, you can perform the same experiment in a different way and the electron you measure in the future will communicate back in time. Measure the spin next year and the one you have separated in front of you will collapse today to the exact opposite spin before you’ve even taken the measurement.
Since this is supposed to be an easy article to understand, let me tell you of the implications rather than how it’s done. It’s easy to understand but the article would have to be twice as long. There are different techniques with some straight forward and others overly involved. Creating what they call qubits is one way which is short for quantum bits and is a little more involved but I only mention it for anyone who wants to investigate this further.
Up until recently it was believed that any of this was useless because it couldn’t be used to transfer information through time. However, it is now believed that by setting up a coding system, communicating through binary is theoretically possible. So in theory I could send you next year’s newspaper headline back through time as binary. This is all in the early stages, but the science is solid. Entangled particles like electrons communicate not only faster than light, they also break the time barrier. One current theory is that the electrons communicate bypassing our space time dimension completely.
This is HUGE – it opens up not only communication possibilities but quantum computing possibilities. Meaning computers from the future may already be communicating with one another back through the internet and back through time. So, the original study at Michigan Technology may have actually been ahead of its time or behind its time or something that we may figure out or already have and don’t know it yet or whatever.
This article was written using concepts from the non-fiction book “Sin Thesis” available at Amazon written by the author Robert Torres.


worldtruthtv--2020-07-05--Nestle CEO: Water Is Not A Human Right, Should Be Privatized

Is water a free and basic essential human right , or should all the water on the planet belong to major corporations and the super rich that control them ?
Should the poor be put in a position where they are sentenced to death , just because they were born into unfair circumstances ?
According to the former CEO and now Chairman of one of the biggest corporations in the world , and the largest food product manufacturer in the world , corporations should , in fact , own every single drop of water on the planet , and no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to it , unless they pay for it .
Think we ’ re exaggerating ?
Watch the video below for yourself : Nestle is also a massive pro GMO company and uses these ingredients in some of their products , including the very popular kid ’ s cereal cheerios In fact , chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe ( from the video above ) claims that there has never been “ one illness ” ever caused from consuming GMOs , despite evidence that clearly demonstrates this is not true .
This man is clearly sick minded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But again , he is just a voice behind a company that has a long history of corruption .
Nestle , like any predator , actually goes into struggling rural areas around the world and extracts the groundwater for their bottled water products by bribing local corrupt politicians , which then results in their completely destroying the water supply of the area without any compensation to the people .
In fact , the company reaps an astounding $ 35 billion in annual profit from water bottle sales alone .
And , staying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were recently caught extracting water illegally since their permits expired 27 years ago , yet still this company is allowed to operate , where as it were you or I , we would be sent to jail .
Corporate Watch has been keeping an eye of Nestle for a long time and documented their crimes in detail , which , in addition to crimes mentioned above , includes animal cruelty , exploiting farmers , fraudulent labeling and polluting the planet , along with other crimes they have yet to be fully held accountable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right , or should it be owned by the elite ?
Whether it ’ s Nestle trying to control the water supply , or Monsanto trying to control the food supply , no one has a right to control the Earth ’ s natural resources simply because they decided that they get that right .
Imagine you tried to make such a bold and psychotic move ?
We would be thrown in jail , so why do they get to do it ?
Because they have all the paper money , which you @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Reddit Telegram More Email 8K Shares
Is water a free and basic essential human right, or should all the water on the planet belong to major corporations and the super rich that control them? Should the poor be put in a position where they are sentenced to death, just because they were born into unfair circumstances?
According to the former CEO and now Chairman of one of the biggest corporations in the world, and the largest food product manufacturer in the world, corporations should, in fact, own every single drop of water on the planet, and no one should be allowed to have access to it, unless they pay for it.
Think we’re exaggerating? Watch the video below for yourself:
Nestle has a horrible track record for those who have researched them. From employing child slave labor, to bribing doctors in Pakistan, the Nestle company warped view of the world from their CEO is actually not surprising at all.
Nestle is also a massive pro GMO company and uses these ingredients in some of their products, including the very popular kid’s cereal cheerios In fact, chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe (from the video above) claims that there has never been “one illness” ever caused from consuming GMOs, despite evidence that clearly demonstrates this is not true. This man is clearly sick minded and has no regard for human wellbeing. But again, he is just a voice behind a company that has a long history of corruption.
Nestle, like any predator, actually goes into struggling rural areas around the world and extracts the groundwater for their bottled water products by bribing local corrupt politicians, which then results in their completely destroying the water supply of the area without any compensation to the people. In fact, the company reaps an astounding $35 billion in annual profit from water bottle sales alone. And, staying true to their criminal foundation, they were recently caught extracting water illegally since their permits expired 27 years ago, yet still this company is allowed to operate, where as it were you or I, we would be sent to jail.
Corporate Watch has been keeping an eye of Nestle for a long time and documented their crimes in detail, which, in addition to crimes mentioned above, includes animal cruelty, exploiting farmers, fraudulent labeling and polluting the planet, along with other crimes they have yet to be fully held accountable for.
So is water a human right, or should it be owned by the elite?
Whether it’s Nestle trying to control the water supply, or Monsanto trying to control the food supply, no one has a right to control the Earth’s natural resources simply because they decided that they get that right. Imagine you tried to make such a bold and psychotic move? We would be thrown in jail, so why do they get to do it? Because they have all the paper money, which you cannot drink, or eat?


worldtruthtv--2020-07-05--Mother Teresa Exposed, New Evidence Shows That She—and The Vatican—Were Even Worse Than We Could Hav

Mother Teresa Exposed, New Evidence Shows That She—and The Vatican—Were Even Worse Than We Could Have Imagined

Renowned humanitarian and winner of the Nobel Prize in 1979 , Mother Teresa is a named recognized ( and respected ) by many .
Originally born Agnes Gonxha , Mother Teresa has recently been receiving a renewed look at the validity of her reputation .
Often named as one of the most admired women in the world , author Christopher Hitchens was the first to expose a very different side in his book “ The Missionary Position : Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice ” .
While his book was widely criticized , Hitchens was never sued for libel or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any of his claims refuted , or even received direct response from the Mother Teresa Foundation or The Vatican .
While this is not an admission of guilt by any means , it certainly doesn ’ t look good to leave these statements in a grey area !
Essentially , the argument against Mother Teresa revolves around four main points : 1 .
She seemed to love suffering ; 2 .
She often refused to provide adequate medical care ; 3 .
She may have received financial support from disreputable sources ; and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Soon , a peer-reviewed paper from the University of Montreal may make even bolder claims against Mother Teresa ’ s saintliness .
The summary below is from a press release by the university : Soon , a peer-reviewed paper from the University of Montreal may make even bolder claims against Mother Teresa ’ s saintliness .
The summary below is from a press release by the university : The myth of altruism and generosity surrounding Mother Teresa is dispelled in a paper by Serge Larivee and Genevieve Chenard of University of Montreal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Senechal of the University of Ottawa ’ s Faculty of Education .
The paper will be published in the March issue of the journal Studies in Religion/Sciences religieuses and is an analysis of the published writings about Mother Teresa .
Like the journalist and author Christopher Hitchens , who is amply quoted in their analysis , the researchers conclude that her hallowed image — which does not stand up to analysis of the facts — was constructed , and that her beatification was orchestrated by an effective media relations campaign .
“ While @ @ @ @ @ @ @ altruism for a seminar on ethics , one of us stumbled upon the life and work of one of Catholic Church ’ s most celebrated woman and now part of our collective imagination — Mother Teresa — whose real name was Agnes Gonxha ” says Professor Larivee , who led the research .
“ The description was so ecstatic that it piqued our curiosity and pushed us to research further.
” As a result , the three researchers collected 502 documents on the life and work of Mother Teresa .
After eliminating 195 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conduct their analysis , representing 96 % of the literature on the founder of the Order of the Missionaries of Charity ( OMC ) .
Facts debunk the myth of Mother Teresa In their article , Serge Larivee and his colleagues also cite a number of problems not take into account by the Vatican in Mother Teresa ’ s beatification process , such as “ her rather dubious way of caring for the sick , her questionable political contacts , her suspicious management of the enormous sums of money she received , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particular , abortion , contraception , and divorce.
” Further quotes from the press release go on to explain the three types of wrong-doing that the report believes Mother Teresa engaged in .
As follows : 1 .
Mother Teresa often refused to provide adequate medical care , preferring to take joy in her patients ’ suffering .
From the press release : “ At the time of her death , Mother Teresa had opened 517 missions welcoming the poor and sick in more than 100 countries .
The missions have been described @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by doctors visiting several of these establishments in Calcutta .
Two-thirds of the people coming to these missions hoped to a find a doctor to treat them , while the other third lay dying without receiving appropriate care .
The doctors observed a significant lack of hygiene , even unfit conditions , as well as a shortage of actual care , inadequate food , and no painkillers .
The problem is not a lack of money — the Foundation created by Mother Teresa has raised hundreds of millions of dollars — but rather @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot , to suffer it like Christ ’ s Passion .
The world gains much from their suffering , ” was her reply to criticism , cites the journalist Christopher Hitchens .
Nevertheless , when Mother Teresa required palliative care , she received it in a modern American hospital.
” 2 .
She would receive money from dubious sources , yet use almost none of it to help others.Again , quoting the researchers : “ Mother Teresa was generous with her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s millions when it came to humanity ’ s suffering .
During numerous floods in India or following the explosion of a pesticide plant in Bhopal , she offered numerous prayers and medallions of the Virgin Mary but no direct or monetary aid .
On the other hand , she had no qualms about accepting the Legion of Honour and a grant from the Duvalier dictatorship in Haiti .
Millions of dollars were transferred to the MCO ’ s various bank accounts , but most of the accounts were kept secret , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ management of Mother Theresa ’ s works , one may ask where the millions of dollars for the poorest of the poor have gone ?
’ ” 3 .
She was promoted by an anti-abortionist journalist , Malcolm Muggeridge , and her beatification wasn ’ t based on genuine miracles .
This one might be the most damning : “ .
.In 1969 , [ Muggeridge ] made a eulogistic film of the missionary , promoting her by attributing to her the “ first photographic miracle ” when it should have been attributed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Kodak .
Afterwards , Mother Teresa travelled throughout the world and received numerous awards , including the Nobel Peace Prize .
In her acceptance speech , on the subject of Bosnian women who were raped by Serbs and now sought abortion , she said : â€˜I feel the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion , because it is a direct war , a direct killing — direct murder by the mother herself.
” Following her death , the Vatican decided to waive the usual five-year waiting period to open the beatification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Theresa was the healing of a woman , Monica Besra , who had been suffering from intense abdominal pain .
The woman testified that she was cured after a medallion blessed by Mother Theresa was placed on her abdomen .
Her doctors thought otherwise : the ovarian cyst and the tuberculosis from which she suffered were healed by the drugs they had given her .
The Vatican , nevertheless , concluded that it was a miracle .
Mother Teresa ’ s popularity was such that she had become untouchable for the population , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ What could be better than beatification followed by canonization of this model to revitalize the Church and inspire the faithful especially at a time when churches are empty and the Roman authority is in decline ?
” Larivee and his colleagues ask.
”  It ’ s worthwhile to note that each of these claims seems to support Hitchens ’ work and observations .
So why does the press release go on to undo much of their own claims ?
As follows : “ Despite Mother Teresa ’ s dubious way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their suffering instead of relieving it , Serge Larivee and his colleagues point out the positive effect of the Mother Teresa myth : “ If the extraordinary image of Mother Teresa conveyed in the collective imagination has encouraged humanitarian initiatives that are genuinely engaged with those crushed by poverty , we can only rejoice .
It is likely that she has inspired many humanitarian workers whose actions have truly relieved the suffering of the destitute and addressed the causes of poverty and isolation without being extolled by the media .
Nevertheless , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been a little more rigorous.
” … Which , to me , sounds like a rather elaborate means of continuing to deny Mother Teresa ’ s responsibility in her less-than-admirable actions .
Still , her order of nuns is not working towards curing an illness ; still , the lost donations have not been found .
In my mind , this is unacceptable .
When the paper is released , the authors claim to provide evidence that Mother Teresa ( or , her image ) provides a positive effect on the lives of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Hitchens ’ claims will no longer be able to be dismissed as thoroughly , as a peer-reviewed paper by academics carries with it much more weight than a single author ’ s research .
More than anything , this may be a call towards a raising of awareness for all people involved .
Rather than continue to rely on the images we ’ ve been given , why should we not pursue our own understandings , our own investigations , into what is right ?
Be that abortion laws or medical care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flawless as Mother Teresa may never be able to be lived up to by the reality of who we are as human beings .

Renowned humanitarian and winner of the Nobel Prize in 1979, Mother Teresa is a named recognized (and respected) by many. Originally born Agnes Gonxha, Mother Teresa has recently been receiving a renewed look at the validity of her reputation. Often named as one of the most admired women in the world, author Christopher Hitchens was the first to expose a very different side in his book “The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice”.
While his book was widely criticized, Hitchens was never sued for libel or slander. Nor, surprisingly, were any of his claims refuted, or even received direct response from the Mother Teresa Foundation or The Vatican. While this is not an admission of guilt by any means, it certainly doesn’t look good to leave these statements in a grey area!
Essentially, the argument against Mother Teresa revolves around four main points: 1. She seemed to love suffering; 2. She often refused to provide adequate medical care; 3. She may have received financial support from disreputable sources; and 4. Claimed mistreatment of her nuns.
Soon, a peer-reviewed paper from the University of Montreal may make even bolder claims against Mother Teresa’s saintliness. The summary below is from a press release by the university:
Soon, a peer-reviewed paper from the University of Montreal may make even bolder claims against Mother Teresa’s saintliness. The summary below is from a press release by the university:
The myth of altruism and generosity surrounding Mother Teresa is dispelled in a paper by Serge Larivee and Genevieve Chenard of University of Montreal’s Department of Psychoeducation and Carole Senechal of the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Education. The paper will be published in the March issue of the journal Studies in Religion/Sciences religieuses and is an analysis of the published writings about Mother Teresa. Like the journalist and author Christopher Hitchens, who is amply quoted in their analysis, the researchers conclude that her hallowed image — which does not stand up to analysis of the facts — was constructed, and that her beatification was orchestrated by an effective media relations campaign.

“While looking for documentation on the phenomenon of altruism for a seminar on ethics, one of us stumbled upon the life and work of one of Catholic Church’s most celebrated woman and now part of our collective imagination — Mother Teresa — whose real name was Agnes Gonxha” says Professor Larivee, who led the research. “The description was so ecstatic that it piqued our curiosity and pushed us to research further.”

As a result, the three researchers collected 502 documents on the life and work of Mother Teresa. After eliminating 195 duplicates, they consulted 287 documents to conduct their analysis, representing 96% of the literature on the founder of the Order of the Missionaries of Charity (OMC). Facts debunk the myth of Mother Teresa
In their article, Serge Larivee and his colleagues also cite a number of problems not take into account by the Vatican in Mother Teresa’s beatification process, such as “her rather dubious way of caring for the sick, her questionable political contacts, her suspicious management of the enormous sums of money she received, and her overly dogmatic views regarding, in particular, abortion, contraception, and divorce.”
I always wondered why the Catholic Church rushed to canonize Mother Teresa after her death. Turns out she was a child trafficker, selling babies & funneling between $50-100 million/year to the Vatican. Her long-time assistant was beaten to death yesterday.https://t.co/HIDpOVNEto — Tiffany FitzHenry (@Tiff_FitzHenry) July 27, 2019
Further quotes from the press release go on to explain the three types of wrong-doing that the report believes Mother Teresa engaged in. As follows:
1. Mother Teresa often refused to provide adequate medical care, preferring to take joy in her patients’ suffering. From the press release: “At the time of her death, Mother Teresa had opened 517 missions welcoming the poor and sick in more than 100 countries. The missions have been described as “homes for the dying” by doctors visiting several of these establishments in Calcutta. Two-thirds of the people coming to these missions hoped to a find a doctor to treat them, while the other third lay dying without receiving appropriate care. The doctors observed a significant lack of hygiene, even unfit conditions, as well as a shortage of actual care, inadequate food, and no painkillers. The problem is not a lack of money — the Foundation created by Mother Teresa has raised hundreds of millions of dollars — but rather a particular conception of suffering and death: “There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s Passion. The world gains much from their suffering,” was her reply to criticism, cites the journalist Christopher Hitchens. Nevertheless, when Mother Teresa required palliative care, she received it in a modern American hospital.”
2. She would receive money from dubious sources, yet use almost none of it to help others.Again, quoting the researchers: “Mother Teresa was generous with her prayers but rather miserly with her foundation’s millions when it came to humanity’s suffering. During numerous floods in India or following the explosion of a pesticide plant in Bhopal, she offered numerous prayers and medallions of the Virgin Mary but no direct or monetary aid. On the other hand, she had no qualms about accepting the Legion of Honour and a grant from the Duvalier dictatorship in Haiti. Millions of dollars were transferred to the MCO’s various bank accounts, but most of the accounts were kept secret, Larivee says. ‘Given the parsimonious management of Mother Theresa’s works, one may ask where the millions of dollars for the poorest of the poor have gone?’”
3 . She was promoted by an anti-abortionist journalist, Malcolm Muggeridge, and her beatification wasn’t based on genuine miracles. This one might be the most damning: “. .In 1969, [Muggeridge] made a eulogistic film of the missionary, promoting her by attributing to her the “first photographic miracle” when it should have been attributed to the new film stock being marketed by Kodak. Afterwards, Mother Teresa travelled throughout the world and received numerous awards, including the Nobel Peace Prize. In her acceptance speech, on the subject of Bosnian women who were raped by Serbs and now sought abortion, she said: â€˜I feel the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a direct war, a direct killing — direct murder by the mother herself.” Following her death, the Vatican decided to waive the usual five-year waiting period to open the beatification process. The miracle attributed to Mother Theresa was the healing of a woman, Monica Besra, who had been suffering from intense abdominal pain. The woman testified that she was cured after a medallion blessed by Mother Theresa was placed on her abdomen. Her doctors thought otherwise: the ovarian cyst and the tuberculosis from which she suffered were healed by the drugs they had given her. The Vatican, nevertheless, concluded that it was a miracle. Mother Teresa’s popularity was such that she had become untouchable for the population, which had already declared her a saint. “What could be better than beatification followed by canonization of this model to revitalize the Church and inspire the faithful especially at a time when churches are empty and the Roman authority is in decline?” Larivee and his colleagues ask.”
It’s worthwhile to note that each of these claims seems to support Hitchens’ work and observations. So why does the press release go on to undo much of their own claims? As follows: “Despite Mother Teresa’s dubious way of caring for the sick by glorifying their suffering instead of relieving it, Serge Larivee and his colleagues point out the positive effect of the Mother Teresa myth: “If the extraordinary image of Mother Teresa conveyed in the collective imagination has encouraged humanitarian initiatives that are genuinely engaged with those crushed by poverty, we can only rejoice. It is likely that she has inspired many humanitarian workers whose actions have truly relieved the suffering of the destitute and addressed the causes of poverty and isolation without being extolled by the media. Nevertheless, the media coverage of Mother Theresa could have been a little more rigorous.”
… Which, to me, sounds like a rather elaborate means of continuing to deny Mother Teresa’s responsibility in her less-than-admirable actions. Still, her order of nuns is not working towards curing an illness; still, the lost donations have not been found. In my mind, this is unacceptable.
When the paper is released, the authors claim to provide evidence that Mother Teresa (or, her image) provides a positive effect on the lives of people around the world. Either way, Hitchens’ claims will no longer be able to be dismissed as thoroughly, as a peer-reviewed paper by academics carries with it much more weight than a single author’s research.
More than anything, this may be a call towards a raising of awareness for all people involved. Rather than continue to rely on the images we’ve been given, why should we not pursue our own understandings, our own investigations, into what is right? Be that abortion laws or medical care, the idea of a woman as flawless as Mother Teresa may never be able to be lived up to by the reality of who we are as human beings.
via:
WorldTruth.Tv / globalnews.ca