worldtruthtv--2020-09-10--CIA Pilot Presents Evidence That No Planes Hit Towers On 9/11

Ex-CIA and commercial jet pilot John Lear claims that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11 , and now detailed information has been posted online corroborating his account .
In Lear ’ s expert opinion the official claim that two planes crashed into the towers is actually “ physically impossible.
” With reports from the Kremlin that President Putin will release satellite images proving that the Twin Towers were destroyed by “ controlled demolition ” rather than by the force of two planes , enormous strides towards disproving the official 9/11 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grandson of Learjet founder Bill Lear , John Lear is a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot who has flown over 100 different types of plane during 40 years of active flying .
He holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certified pilot , and has flown secret CIA missions in Asia , Africa , Eastern Europe and the Middle East .
Basically , you don ’ t want to argue with John Lear about flying and planes .
He is as close as you can come to being American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ THAT NO REAL PLANES WERE USED ON 9/11 We are supposed to believe that both planes were entirely inside the towers , with no pieces showing .
A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide and 159 feet long .
The distance from : the outer perimeter of the North Tower at the alleged point of contact by AA Flight 11 , to : the central 47 massive inner core beams that are cross-braced is 60 feet .
The distance from : the outer surface of the South Tower at the alleged point of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : the core structure of that building was 37 feet .
The differential in length in relation to the North Tower with respect to plane length and a building length that is measured in terms of the distance to the core structure is about 99 feet .
The differential length for the South Tower is approximately 122 feet .
A 767 is 159 feet long so most of the plane has got to be outside of the tower in both cases since there is simply no room for the entire length of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t we see 99 feet of AA Flight 11 sticking out of the North Tower or broken off , crumpled up , and/or crumbling to the ground below ?
Why didn ’ t we see 122 feet of UA Flight 175 sticking out of the South Tower or crumpled up , and/or crumbling to the WTC plaza below ?
There is no plane or plane wreckage at all to be seen in the hole of either tower in any video or photos .
We would expect a sharp deceleration as the plane @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of space ( North Tower , Flight 11 ) and 35 feet of space ( South Tower , Flight 175 ) from the perimeter to the central steel core .
Instead , in the videos , both planes enter the towers entirely at uniform motion .
A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide .
The width of the hole in the South Tower was 106 feet wide and the width of the hole in the North Tower was 125 feet wide .
50 feet of the Boeing 767 that allegedly struck the South @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet .
31 feet of the Boeing 767 that is said to have hit the North Tower can not fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet .
Some people may say that the wings of the Boeings merely folded back as the aluminum portion of the wings came in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ However we can see this is not what happens in the videos .
Even so the aluminum wings would not neatly fold back they would be torn off .
Isaac Newton ’ s Third Law of Motion : “ For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
” High school physics states that the force an airplane exerts on a building is the same as the force a building exerts on an airplane .
Let ’ s apply Newton ’ s Third Law to Flight 175 .
In the 9/11 story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at 450 m.p.h .
Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h .
and struck a stationary Flight 175 .
We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged .
We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower .
Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fiberglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton ’ s Laws of Motion .
The above diagram shows that Flight 175 was intersecting with eight ( 8 ) floors that consisted of steel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ core columns and to the external support columns at the other , where each floor was covered with 4-8 ” of concrete , representing an acre of concrete apiece and posing enormous horizontal resistance to any airplane ’ s penetration into the building .
In the impact videos , notably the Hezarkhani , Luc Courchesne , Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost .
As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breaking of the plane .
No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart .
This is impossible .
It is cartoon physics .
It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter .
A passenger jet is a hollow aluminum and plastic tube which is highly vulnerable to impacts with flying birds .
The “ plane ” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact , a pair of buildings made with 200,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tip of the plane ’ s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up .
That would cause the wings to break off .
From the holes left in both towers after “ impact ” we are supposed to believe the wings sliced clean through the 14 inch steel beams but this is simply impossible .
The fragile mostly hollow aluminum wings would not slice through all the 14 inch steel box columns of the WTC towers and leave a Wylie Coyote style hole .
An @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a wooden telephone pole : Apart from one or two props placed there like a bit of tire and a bit of engine…parts that didn ’ t even match a Boeing 767 and like the laughable bit of engine on the Pentagon lawn there were no real plane parts or debris to be seen and no black boxes were ever found at ground zero .
In reality , if a plane had hit the tower it would have crushed up like a car hitting a wall and its wings would have broken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would have fallen to the street below .
The street below would have been littered with plane debris and the charred remains of the passengers yet it wasn ’ t because there was no plane .
FAA Regulation 121 requires a comprehensive investigation of all crashes of scheduled commercial flights yet there are no official crash reports on the 4 incidents because there were no planes .
“ THE AIRCRAFT WOULD LITERALLY FALL OUT OF THE SKY ” Experienced commercial and military pilots have stated that the speed and manoeuvres of the planes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impossible to have happened .
They state they could not replicate the alleged flights themselves .
Two experienced pilots using flight simulators on the morning of 9/11 could not hit towers at 500 mph in six attempts .
In reality a 767 fly can not fly that fast at sea level .
Pilots For 9/11 Truth state that the speed and sharp manoeuvres would have resulted in the plane breaking up from the stress on the aircraft frame due to the the speed and air pressure .
It would be extremely difficult for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even if the wings didn ’ t break off due to the stress .
Capt .
Russ Wittenberg is a former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions .
Retired commercial pilot .
Flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years .
Aircraft flown : Boeing 707 , 720 , 727 , 737 , 747 , 757 , 767 , and 777 .
30,000+ total hours flown .
Capt .
Russ Wittenberg is a unique individual in that he had previously flown the actual two United Airlines aircraft @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is what he has to say : “ I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11 ; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93 , the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that ’ s alleged to have hit the South Tower .
I don ’ t believe it ’ s possible for , like I said , for a terrorist , a so-called terrorist to train on a [ Cessna ] 172 , then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , lateral navigate the aircraft , and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it ’ s design limit speed by well over 100 knots , make high-speed high-banked turns , exceeding — pulling probably 5 , 6 , 7 G ’ s .
And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky .
I couldn ’ t do it and I ’ m absolutely positive they couldn ’ t do it.
” “ The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S .
plain and simple.
” … Wittenberg convincingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Flight 77 could have “ descended 7,000 feet in two minutes , all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon ’ s first floor wall without touching the lawn.
” … “ I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11 ; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93 , the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that ’ s alleged to have hit the South Tower .
I don ’ t believe it ’ s possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a terrorist , a so-called terrorist to train on a [ Cessna ] 172 , then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit , and vertical navigate the aircraft , lateral navigate the aircraft , and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it ’ s design limit speed by well over 100 knots , make high-speed high-banked turns , exceeding — pulling probably 5 , 6 , 7 G ’ s .
And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky .
I couldn ’ t do it and I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t do it.
” “ For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible – there is not one chance in a thousand , ” said Wittenberg , recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727 ’ s to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737 ’ s through 767 ’ s it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying .
“ The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ won ’ t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles .
… To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous… It ’ s roughly a 100 ton airplane .
And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building .
There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon .
… The vehicle that hit the Pentagon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as you may have heard before , it was a cruise missile.
” In all of the footage the alleged planes hitting the twin towers clearly do not look real .
The planes have a computer generated appearance .
In the different footage we see the planes changing shape and color , missing wings , are featureless and blurred .
Pilot John Lear made the observation that the plane has no strobe lights .
The plane also casts no shadow .
NO RECORD OF FLIGHTS TAKING OFF According to BTS statistics , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on 9/11 .
The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the country also showed no elapsed run-way time , wheels-off time and taxi-out time , not to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the two flights .
Although flights 11 and 77 have the above data meticulously logged on 9/10 , it was suspiciously absent on 9/11 , even when every other plane that took of that day had been recorded and logged by the BTS .
The flight that was labelled flight 11 by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Manhattan at 8:46am .
If flights AA 11 and AA 77 never existed , then there are only two planes , not four , to be accounted for .
Investigators who have checked the tail numbers for the planes which departed as UA 93 and UA 175 on 9/11 ( namely N591UA and N612UA respectively ) believe that these planes are still in service .
If so , and if AA 11 and AA 77 never existed , then the number of Boeing 757s and 767s destroyed on 9/11 was not four , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rather zero .
Both UA 175 , plane number N612UA and UA 93 , plane number N591UA , were “ still registered and valid more than 4 years after [ their ] alleged destruction .
Pilots For 9/11 Truth , have confirmed that United 175 received a message at least twenty minutes after it allegedly crashed into the World Trade Center .
This proves that the flight never smashed into the Center but instead flew for some time that day , a point advanced in the book ‘ Planes Without Passengers : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people in the 9/11 Truth community accept that no planes were used at the Pentagon and Shanksville ; the evidence shows no real planes were used for the towers either .
In conclusion we can be 100 % certain the planes were not real .
Apart from defying the laws of physics with impossible crash dynamics the planes do not even look real .
The question is : are the planes digital composites ( CGI ) inserted into real video or is it a 3D projected image using advanced technology not known to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s 3D radar data analysis has confirmed that the trajectory of the “ planes ” in all the videos match up with the radar data .
If video fakery was used i.e the planes were digital composites , the question can be asked why would they go to the trouble of making sure all the “ plane ” videos match up with the radar data but do such a poor job of rendering the planes which look like poor quality CGI , Why does the wing momentarily disappear in six different videos ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ video showing a digital composite plane on the top and the original “ plane ” from the Hezarkhani video underneath : http : //imageshack.com/a/img198/7545/n16q.jpg The digital composite plane looks more realistic .
Here is a video showing how easy it is to create a digital composite plane and insert it into real video : www.youtube.com Why would they create such poor quality CGI planes that look different in different videos ?
If the planes were a digital composite it should look the same in every video .
Based on Richard D Hall ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the witness testimony and the fact the left wing disappears in 4 videos and the right wing in 2 videos the evidence points to the plane being a 3D projection .
Richard D Hall believes there may have been a solid object , probably a small missile at the centre of the “ illusion ” , with an image of a Boeing 767 being projected around it .
The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location , removed from the display generator .
The projector can be used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It is also useful for optical deception and cloaking , providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary.
” This technology was reported in the media before 9/11 pertaining to military psychological operations ( PSYOPS ) .
According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea , the feasibility had been established of projecting large , three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air .
…washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application @ @ @ @ @ @ @ described in a classified Air Force document as a system to “ project information power from space … for special operations deception missions .
”

Reddit Telegram More Email 270K Shares
Ex-CIA and commercial jet pilot John Lear claims that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11, and now detailed information has been posted online corroborating his account.
In Lear’s expert opinion the official claim that two planes crashed into the towers is actually “physically impossible.”
With reports from the Kremlin that President Putin will release satellite images proving that the Twin Towers were destroyed by “controlled demolition” rather than by the force of two planes, enormous strides towards disproving the official 9/11 Commission version are taking place.
The grandson of Learjet founder Bill Lear, John Lear is a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot who has flown over 100 different types of plane during 40 years of active flying. He holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certified pilot, and has flown secret CIA missions in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
Basically, you don’t want to argue with John Lear about flying and planes. He is as close as you can come to being American intelligence and aerospace aristocracy.
9/11 Plane Hoax proves his theories:
THE PROOF THAT NO REAL PLANES WERE USED ON 9/11
We are supposed to believe that both planes were entirely inside the towers, with no pieces showing. A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide and 159 feet long. The distance from: the outer perimeter of the North Tower at the alleged point of contact by AA Flight 11, to: the central 47 massive inner core beams that are cross-braced is 60 feet. The distance from: the outer surface of the South Tower at the alleged point of contact by UA Flight 175, to: the core structure of that building was 37 feet.
The differential in length in relation to the North Tower with respect to plane length and a building length that is measured in terms of the distance to the core structure is about 99 feet. The differential length for the South Tower is approximately 122 feet.
A 767 is 159 feet long so most of the plane has got to be outside of the tower in both cases since there is simply no room for the entire length of the plane to crumple into. Why didn’t we see 99 feet of AA Flight 11 sticking out of the North Tower or broken off, crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the ground below? Why didn’t we see 122 feet of UA Flight 175 sticking out of the South Tower or crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the WTC plaza below?
There is no plane or plane wreckage at all to be seen in the hole of either tower in any video or photos.
Of course, there are no planes to be seen in the holes of either tower or on the street below because there were no real planes.
We would expect a sharp deceleration as the plane crumpled to fit into the 60 feet of space (North Tower, Flight 11) and 35 feet of space (South Tower, Flight 175) from the perimeter to the central steel core. Instead, in the videos, both planes enter the towers entirely at uniform motion.
A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide. The width of the hole in the South Tower was 106 feet wide and the width of the hole in the North Tower was 125 feet wide. 50 feet of the Boeing 767 that allegedly struck the South Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. 31 feet of the Boeing 767 that is said to have hit the North Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. Some people may say that the wings of the Boeings merely folded back as the aluminum portion of the wings came in contact with the exterior steel columns. However we can see this is not what happens in the videos. Even so the aluminum wings would not neatly fold back they would be torn off.
Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” High school physics states that the force an airplane exerts on a building is the same as the force a building exerts on an airplane. Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h.
Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower. Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fiberglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.
The above diagram shows that Flight 175 was intersecting with eight (8) floors that consisted of steel trusses connected at one end to the core columns and to the external support columns at the other, where each floor was covered with 4-8” of concrete, representing an acre of concrete apiece and posing enormous horizontal resistance to any airplane’s penetration into the building.
In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower there is no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. This is impossible. It is cartoon physics. It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter.
A passenger jet is a hollow aluminum and plastic tube which is highly vulnerable to impacts with flying birds. The “plane” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.
From the holes left in both towers after “impact” we are supposed to believe the wings sliced clean through the 14 inch steel beams but this is simply impossible. The fragile mostly hollow aluminum wings would not slice through all the 14 inch steel box columns of the WTC towers and leave a Wylie Coyote style hole. An airplane wing can be sliced in half by a wooden telephone pole:
Aluminum plane wings will not cut through 14 inch steel regardless of speed and weight. Not only is it impossible for the wings to have cut through the steel columns but it is absolutely impossible for the fragile wing tips to have also cut through the steel columns.
The wings would break off immediately upon contact and the plane would explode. It would not enter the tower and then explode. The plane would simply be obliterated to pieces by the 14 inch steel box columns and the steel and concrete floor trusses before it got anywhere near the inside of the tower.
Newton’s First Law of Motion: “A body remains at rest or in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.” The plane did not slow down as it made contact with the tower. How can the plane fly at the same speed through the steel/concrete face of the tower as it did through the air? This is impossible. The “plane” also violates Newton’s First Law.
THERE ARE NO VERIFIED AIRPLANE PARTS
Apart from one or two props placed there like a bit of tire and a bit of engine…parts that didn’t even match a Boeing 767 and like the laughable bit of engine on the Pentagon lawn there were no real plane parts or debris to be seen and no black boxes were ever found at ground zero. In reality, if a plane had hit the tower it would have crushed up like a car hitting a wall and its wings would have broken off and the majority of the plane would have fallen to the street below. The street below would have been littered with plane debris and the charred remains of the passengers yet it wasn’t because there was no plane.
NO OFFICIAL CRASH REPORTS
FAA Regulation 121 requires a comprehensive investigation of all crashes of scheduled commercial flights yet there are no official crash reports on the 4 incidents because there were no planes.
“THE AIRCRAFT WOULD LITERALLY FALL OUT OF THE SKY”
Experienced commercial and military pilots have stated that the speed and manoeuvres of the planes that hit the World Trade Center are impossible to have happened. They state they could not replicate the alleged flights themselves. Two experienced pilots using flight simulators on the morning of 9/11 could not hit towers at 500 mph in six attempts. In reality a 767 fly can not fly that fast at sea level. Pilots For 9/11 Truth state that the speed and sharp manoeuvres would have resulted in the plane breaking up from the stress on the aircraft frame due to the the speed and air pressure. It would be extremely difficult for the pilot to actually hit the tower even if the wings didn’t break off due to the stress.
Capt. Russ Wittenberg is a former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Retired commercial pilot. Flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years. Aircraft flown: Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. 30,000+ total hours flown. Capt. Russ Wittenberg is a unique individual in that he had previously flown the actual two United Airlines aircraft Flight 93 and Flight 175.
This is what he has to say:
Video interview 9/11 Ripple Effect 8/07:
“I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.
I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it’s design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s.
And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”
Article 7/17/05:
“The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple.” … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have “descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon’s first floor wall without touching the lawn.”…
“I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.
I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it’s design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”
“For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible – there is not one chance in a thousand,” said Wittenberg, recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727’s to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737’s through 767’s it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying.
“The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall.
The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous…
It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building.
There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile.”
“PLANES” HAVE A CGI APPEARANCE
In all of the footage the alleged planes hitting the twin towers clearly do not look real. The planes have a computer generated appearance. In the different footage we see the planes changing shape and color, missing wings, are featureless and blurred. Pilot John Lear made the observation that the plane has no strobe lights. The plane also casts no shadow.
NO RECORD OF FLIGHTS TAKING OFF
According to BTS statistics, both 11 and 77 officially never took-off on 9/11. The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the country also showed no elapsed run-way time, wheels-off time and taxi-out time, not to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the two flights.
Although flights 11 and 77 have the above data meticulously logged on 9/10, it was suspiciously absent on 9/11, even when every other plane that took of that day had been recorded and logged by the BTS. The flight that was labelled flight 11 by air traffic control was 10 miles from Manhattan at 8:46am. If flights AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then there are only two planes, not four, to be accounted for. Investigators who have checked the tail numbers for the planes which departed as UA 93 and UA 175 on 9/11 (namely N591UA and N612UA respectively) believe that these planes are still in service. If so, and if AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then the number of Boeing 757s and 767s destroyed on 9/11 was not four, as the US government maintains, but rather zero.
Both UA 175, plane number N612UA and UA 93, plane number N591UA, were “still registered and valid more than 4 years after [their] alleged destruction.
Pilots For 9/11 Truth, have confirmed that United 175 received a message at least twenty minutes after it allegedly crashed into the World Trade Center. This proves that the flight never smashed into the Center but instead flew for some time that day, a point advanced in the book ‘Planes Without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11’.
NO PLANES ANYWHERE
Most people in the 9/11 Truth community accept that no planes were used at the Pentagon and Shanksville; the evidence shows no real planes were used for the towers either.
In conclusion we can be 100% certain the planes were not real. Apart from defying the laws of physics with impossible crash dynamics the planes do not even look real. The question is: are the planes digital composites (CGI) inserted into real video or is it a 3D projected image using advanced technology not known to the public? Richard D Hall’s 3D radar data analysis has confirmed that the trajectory of the “planes” in all the videos match up with the radar data. If video fakery was used i.e the planes were digital composites, the question can be asked why would they go to the trouble of making sure all the “plane” videos match up with the radar data but do such a poor job of rendering the planes which look like poor quality CGI, Why does the wing momentarily disappear in six different videos? This is a still from the Hezarkhani video showing a digital composite plane on the top and the original “plane” from the Hezarkhani video underneath: http://imageshack.com/a/img198/7545/n16q.jpg The digital composite plane looks more realistic.
Why would they create such poor quality CGI planes that look different in different videos? If the planes were a digital composite it should look the same in every video. Based on Richard D Hall’s radar data analysis (www.youtube.com), the witness testimony and the fact the left wing disappears in 4 videos and the right wing in 2 videos the evidence points to the plane being a 3D projection. Richard D Hall believes there may have been a solid object, probably a small missile at the centre of the “illusion”, with an image of a Boeing 767 being projected around it.
ADVANCED HOLOGRAM TECHNOLOGY?
The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator. The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management. It is also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary.”
This technology was reported in the media before 9/11 pertaining to military psychological operations (PSYOPS).
Washington Post
“When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing”
By William M. Arkin
February 1, 1999
A few notable quotes (emphasis added):
According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air.
…washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The “Holographic Projector” is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to “project information power from space … for special operations deception missions.”
via:
911planeshoax.com


worldtruthtv--2020-09-10--19 Years Later Physics Magazine Concludes: 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due To Controlled Demolition

Renowned Physics Magazine Concludes in New Report : All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition .
Over the past 17 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S. government .
The official government position holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings .
But a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11 , published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European physics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.
” While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as “ tin foil hat ” conspiracy theorist , many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes .
“ Given the far-reaching implications , it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ damning report .
The new report is the work of Steven Jones , former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University , Robert Korol , a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario , Canada , Anthony Szamboti , a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter , the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth , a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidence that seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative .
In 2002 , the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre .
There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day , noted NIST .
Official investigations have never been able to thoroughly and coherently explain how this might have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the collapse have raised difficult questions about the veracity of the government ’ s story .
Perhaps most damning of all , the experts claimed that after a thorough forensic analysis of video footage of the building ’ s collapse , it revealed signs of a controlled implosion .
Additionally , Jones has co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust .
The authors of the report note that the buildings fell with such speed and symmetry that they there was no other feasible explanation for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – directly refuting studies that attempted to debunk the idea that the building fell without resistance .
These respected experts ’ new forensic analysis only adds to the growing movement of people calling for a new and impartial investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center .
Revealing the scope and breadth of public disbelief in the official government narrative surrounding the events of 9/11 , even presidential candidate Jill Stein has recently called for a new investigation .

Renowned Physics Magazine Concludes in New Report: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition.
Over the past 17 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S. government. The official government position holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings.
But a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European physics magazine – claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”
While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes.
“Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude in the damning report.
The new report is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers.
The comprehensive report in Europhysics Magazine directly challenges the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidence that seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative.
In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre. There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST.
Official investigations have never been able to thoroughly and coherently explain how this might have happened and various teams tasked with examining the collapse have raised difficult questions about the veracity of the government’s story.
Perhaps most damning of all, the experts claimed that after a thorough forensic analysis of video footage of the building’s collapse, it revealed signs of a controlled implosion. Additionally, Jones has co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust.
The authors of the report note that the buildings fell with such speed and symmetry that they there was no other feasible explanation for the sudden collapse at free fall speeds – directly refuting studies that attempted to debunk the idea that the building fell without resistance. These respected experts’ new forensic analysis only adds to the growing movement of people calling for a new and impartial investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center.
Revealing the scope and breadth of public disbelief in the official government narrative surrounding the events of 9/11, even presidential candidate Jill Stein has recently called for a new investigation.

via:
thefreethoughtproject


worldtruthtv--2020-09-10--15 of The 19 “HIJACKERS” On 9/11 Were CIA Agents, Never On The Plane

According to a newly released report , 15 of the 19 Saudi Arabian “ hijackers ” were actually CIA agents who were , at the time , covertly working with rogue factions of the U.S. Military Industrial Complex to carry out a sinister multifaceted , multi-vectored , plot to loot billions if not trillions of taxpayer dollars from the Corporation of the United States , later funneling the loot into private corporations through defense appropriated funding and numerous no-bid contracts related to the roll-out of the PATRIOT Act .
Additionally , the report concludes that the hijackers never physically boarded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which were purported to have crashed into the Pentagon and Towers 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center , which at the time was an iconic American monument in New York .
“ We know that the 15 hijackers who were Saudis , the alleged hijackers , because they were not on those planes – not one of the 19 hijackers , or any Arabs , were on any of the four planes , according to the passenger list , and according to all of the evidence that would be there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but has not been produced , ” Dr. Barrett said .
“ So these 15 Saudi patsies , who were set up to take the blame for 9/11 , were in fact CIA agents .
We know this – I had this confirmed directly by a CIA source that these 15 Saudis entered , and repeatedly reentered on these supposedly – they call them employment visas , but there ’ s a special number for employment visas that are only given to CIA assets as a reward for their service to the Central @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them to come to the US .
Typically they ’ re paid for their work for the CIA in Saudi Arabia , and then they are given this special kind of visa which is disguised as an employment visa but it ’ s of particular type , ” he stated .
“ And all 15 of these guys had that visa .
That shows that they were in fact Central Intelligence Agency agents .
Some of them were living with FBI people in California .
So these 15 Saudis were not working against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working for the United States government , and they were set up so that Saudi Arabia could be potentially blamed for the September 11 attacks , which were actually perpetrated by Israel and its American assets , ” he pointed out .
While the report goes on to point out that the sole purpose of 9/11 “ was to destroy the seven countries in five years , ” it fails to link the funding and involvement of key U.S. assets and officials who were deeply involved with the operational aspects of the attack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which additionally may include the detonation of nuclear munitions inside a major U.S. city as I reported previously .
Additionally for the haters who say Press TV is not credible and that there is no way the hijackers were CIA operatives funded by the U.S. Government — here is an excerpt from a ‘ mainstream ’ Newsweek article released on Sept. 14 , 2001 , three days after the attacks , which shows the hijackers were trained on U.S. military installations : U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planes that were used in Tuesday ’ s terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s .
Three of the alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola , Fla.-known as the “ Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation , ” according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source .
Another of the alleged hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery , Ala. , said another high-ranking Pentagon official .
The fifth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio , Tex .
Both were former Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to the United States , according to the Pentagon source .
So that ’ s what ’ s up .
Now if you still want to believe the official story be my guest .

Reddit Telegram More Email 2K Shares
According to a newly released report, 15 of the 19 Saudi Arabian “hijackers” were actually CIA agents who were, at the time, covertly working with rogue factions of the U.S. Military Industrial Complex to carry out a sinister multifaceted, multi-vectored, plot to loot billions if not trillions of taxpayer dollars from the Corporation of the United States, later funneling the loot into private corporations through defense appropriated funding and numerous no-bid contracts related to the roll-out of the PATRIOT Act.
Additionally, the report concludes that the hijackers never physically boarded any the alleged “hijacked” airliners, which were purported to have crashed into the Pentagon and Towers 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center, which at the time was an iconic American monument in New York.
Press TV reports:
“We know that the 15 hijackers who were Saudis, the alleged hijackers, because they were not on those planes – not one of the 19 hijackers, or any Arabs, were on any of the four planes, according to the passenger list, and according to all of the evidence that would be there if they were on the planes, but has not been produced,” Dr. Barrett said.
“So these 15 Saudi patsies, who were set up to take the blame for 9/11, were in fact CIA agents. We know this – I had this confirmed directly by a CIA source that these 15 Saudis entered, and repeatedly reentered on these supposedly – they call them employment visas, but there’s a special number for employment visas that are only given to CIA assets as a reward for their service to the Central Intelligence Agency, and this visa allows them to come to the US. Typically they’re paid for their work for the CIA in Saudi Arabia, and then they are given this special kind of visa which is disguised as an employment visa but it’s of particular type,” he stated.
“And all 15 of these guys had that visa. That shows that they were in fact Central Intelligence Agency agents. Some of them were living with FBI people in California. So these 15 Saudis were not working against the United States government, they were working for the United States government, and they were set up so that Saudi Arabia could be potentially blamed for the September 11 attacks, which were actually perpetrated by Israel and its American assets,” he pointed out.
While the report goes on to point out that the sole purpose of 9/11 “was to destroy the seven countries in five years,” it fails to link the funding and involvement of key U.S. assets and officials who were deeply involved with the operational aspects of the attack and a subsequent cover-up of the events, which additionally may include the detonation of nuclear munitions inside a major U.S. city as I reported previously.
Additionally for the haters who say Press TV is not credible and that there is no way the hijackers were CIA operatives funded by the U.S. Government — here is an excerpt from a ‘mainstream’ Newsweek article released on Sept. 14, 2001, three days after the attacks, which shows the hijackers were trained on U.S. military installations:
U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes that were used in Tuesday’s terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s.
Three of the alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla.-known as the “Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation,” according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source.
Another of the alleged hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery, Ala., said another high-ranking Pentagon official. The fifth man may have received language instruction at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Both were former Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to the United States, according to the Pentagon source.
So that’s what’s up. Now if you still want to believe the official story be my guest.
via:
www.intellihub.com


worldtruthtv--2020-09-09--NYU Student’s 9/11 Video From Her Dorm Room Is Just Now Going Viral

Eddie is the founder and owner of www.WorldTruth.TV .
This website is dedicated to educating and informing people with articles @ @ @ @ @ from around the globe .
I have spent the last 38 years researching Bible , @ @ @ @ @ Secret Societies , Symbolism and many other topics that are not reported by mainstream media @

Eddie is the founder and owner of www.WorldTruth.TV. This website is dedicated to educating and informing people with articles on powerful and concealed information from around the globe. I have spent the last 38 years researching Bible, History, Alternative Health, Secret Societies, Symbolism and many other topics that are not reported by mainstream media.


worldtruthtv--2020-09-11--Origins of Human Beings According To Ancient Sumerian Texts

Sumer , or the ‘ land of civilized kings ’ , flourished in Mesopotamia , now modern-day Iraq , around 4500 BC .
Sumerians created an advanced civilization with its own system of elaborate language and writing , architecture and arts , astronomy and mathematics .
Their religious system was a complex one comprised of hundreds of gods .
According to the ancient texts , each Sumerian city was guarded by its own god ; and while humans and gods used to live together , the humans were servants to the gods .
The Sumerian creation myth can be found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ancient Mesopotamian city founded in approximately 5000 BC .
The creation of Earth ( Enuma Elish ) according to the Sumerian tablets begins like this : When in the height heaven was not named , And the earth beneath did not yet bear a name , And the primeval Apsu , who begat them , And chaos , Tiamut , the mother of them both Their waters were mingled together , And no field was formed , no marsh was to be seen ; When of the gods none had been called into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and no destinies were ordained ; Then were created the gods in the midst of heaven , Lahmu and Lahamu were called into being… Sumerian mythology claims that , in the beginning , human-like gods ruled over Earth .
When they came to the Earth , there was much work to be done and these gods toiled the soil , digging to make it habitable and mining its minerals .
The texts mention that at some point the gods mutinied against their labour .
When the gods like men Bore the work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the gods was great , The work was heavy , the distress was much .
Anu , the god of gods , agreed that their labour was too great .
His son Enki , or Ea , proposed to create man to bear the labour , and so , with the help of his half-sister Ninki , he did .
A god was put to death , and his body and blood was mixed with clay .
From that material the first human being was created , in likeness to the gods .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ his personality I have removed your heavy work I have imposed your toil on man .
… In the clay , god and man Shall be bound , To a unity brought together ; So that to the end of days The Flesh and the Soul Which in a god have ripened – That soul in a blood-kinship be bound .
This first man was created in Eden , a Sumerian word which means ‘ flat terrain ’ .
In the Epic of Gilgamesh , Eden is mentioned as the garden of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers .
Sumerian tablet depicting Enki in the creation myth .
( world-myth.com ) Initially human beings were unable to reproduce on their own , but were later modified with the help of Enki and Ninki .
Thus , Adapa was created as a fully functional and independent human being .
This ‘ modification ’ was done without the approval of Enki ’ s brother , Enlil , and a conflict between the gods began .
Enlil became the adversary of man , and the Sumerian tablet mentions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much hardship and suffering .
Adapa , with the help of Enki , ascended to Anu where he failed to answer a question about ‘ the bread and water of life ’ .
Opinions vary on the similarities between this creation story and the biblical story of Adam and Eve in Eden .

Sumer, or the ‘land of civilized kings’, flourished in Mesopotamia, now modern-day Iraq, around 4500 BC. Sumerians created an advanced civilization with its own system of elaborate language and writing, architecture and arts, astronomy and mathematics. Their religious system was a complex one comprised of hundreds of gods.
According to the ancient texts, each Sumerian city was guarded by its own god; and while humans and gods used to live together, the humans were servants to the gods. The Sumerian creation myth can be found on a tablet in Nippur, an ancient Mesopotamian city founded in approximately 5000 BC. The creation of Earth (Enuma Elish) according to the Sumerian tablets begins like this:
When in the height heaven was not named,
And the earth beneath did not yet bear a name,
And the primeval Apsu, who begat them,
And chaos, Tiamut, the mother of them both
Their waters were mingled together,
And no field was formed, no marsh was to be seen;
When of the gods none had been called into being,
And none bore a name, and no destinies were ordained;
Then were created the gods in the midst of heaven,
Lahmu and Lahamu were called into being…
Sumerian mythology claims that, in the beginning, human-like gods ruled over Earth. When they came to the Earth, there was much work to be done and these gods toiled the soil, digging to make it habitable and mining its minerals.
The texts mention that at some point the gods mutinied against their labour.
When the gods like men
Bore the work and suffered the toll
The toil of the gods was great,
The work was heavy, the distress was much.
Anu, the god of gods, agreed that their labour was too great. His son Enki, or Ea, proposed to create man to bear the labour, and so, with the help of his half-sister Ninki, he did. A god was put to death, and his body and blood was mixed with clay. From that material the first human being was created, in likeness to the gods.
You have slaughtered a god together
With his personality
I have removed your heavy work
I have imposed your toil on man.
…
In the clay, god and man
Shall be bound,
To a unity brought together;
So that to the end of days
The Flesh and the Soul
Which in a god have ripened –
That soul in a blood-kinship be bound.
This first man was created in Eden, a Sumerian word which means ‘flat terrain’. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, Eden is mentioned as the garden of the gods and is located somewhere in Mesopotamia between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
Sumerian tablet depicting Enki in the creation myth. (world-myth.com) Initially human beings were unable to reproduce on their own, but were later modified with the help of Enki and Ninki. Thus, Adapa was created as a fully functional and independent human being. This ‘modification’ was done without the approval of Enki’s brother, Enlil, and a conflict between the gods began.
Enlil became the adversary of man, and the Sumerian tablet mentions that men served gods and went through much hardship and suffering. Adapa, with the help of Enki, ascended to Anu where he failed to answer a question about ‘the bread and water of life’. Opinions vary on the similarities between this creation story and the biblical story of Adam and Eve in Eden.
Source:
ancient-origins.net


worldtruthtv--2020-09-10--Courts In Europe Have Sentenced A Baby To Death – This Is Socialized Medicine

There ’ s a horrific case over in the U.K. that hasn ’ t gotten a ton of attention here , but it should .
If we look closely , we may see our future — and our present .
Charlie Gard is a 10-month-old baby who suffers from a rare genetic disorder called mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome .
It ’ s a horrendous condition that leads to organ malfunction , brain damage , and other symptoms .
The hospital that had been treating the boy , Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London , made the determination that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and he must be taken off of life support .
He should “ die with dignity , ” they said .
The parents , Chris Gard and Connie Yates , disagreed .
This is the very crucial thing to understand : they are not insisting that GOSH be forced to keep Charlie on life support .
Rather , they want to take him out of the hospital and to America to undergo a form of experimental therapy that a doctor here had already agreed to administer .
Chris and Connie raised over $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effort to save their child ’ s life .
All they needed the British hospital to do was release their child into their care , which doesn ’ t seem like a terribly burdensome request .
They would then leave the country and try their luck with treatment here .
However slim the chance of success may have been , it was better than just sitting by and watching their baby die .
Here ’ s where things get truly insane and barbaric .
The hospital refused to give Charlie back to his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the courts , and , finally , in the last several hours , the European Court of “ Human Rights ” ruled that the parents should be barred from taking their son to the United States for treatment .
According to the “ human rights ” court , it is Charlie ’ s human right that he expire in his hospital bed in London .
The parents are not allowed to try and save his life .
It is “ in his best interest ” to simply die , they ruled .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supersedes all other rights .
In Europe , a mother may kill her baby but she is not allowed to keep him alive .
I have heard many people rationalize this demented decision by saying “ the doctors know best.
” That may well be relevant and true in situations where family members are trying to force doctors to administer treatments that they , the medical professionals , know will not work .
But that is not what ’ s happening here .
The only thing these parents are trying to “ force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their grip so the child can be taken to different doctors in a different country .
The doctors may be the final authority on what kinds of medical measures they personally should take , but they are not the final authority over life itself .
It is one thing for them to say , “ I will not do this treatment.
” It ’ s quite another for them to say , “ You are not allowed to have this treatment done by anyone .
You must die.
” The former is reasonable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ baby is being euthanized .
By barbarians .
I ’ ve seen some on social media calling this case “ unimaginable ” and “ mind boggling.
” It is certainly awful , but unfortunately it does not boggle my mind or exceed the limits of my imagination .
These sorts of cases are inevitable in Europe , and , unless we make a drastic change of course , they will soon become commonplace here .
The stage is already set .
Just consider these three factors : ( 1 ) This is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State runs the health care system , ultimately they will be the ones who decide whose life is worth saving and whose isn ’ t .
That ’ s not just a byproduct of socialized medicine — it ’ s the point .
And it is especially risky to cede this sort of power to the government when you live in a culture that doesn ’ t fundamentally value parental rights or human life , which brings us to the last two points .
( 2 ) This is what happens when parental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This case came down to the question of who should have the final say over a child .
Should it be the parents , or should it be a collection of doctors , judges , and bureaucrats ?
And if the parents don ’ t take precedence in a life or death situation , can it really be said that they have rights at all ?
If I have no say when my child ’ s very life is at stake , when do I have a say ?
The way things are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have some jurisdiction over the minor minutia of daily life , but when it comes to the major issues — how a child is to be educated , how he is to live , what he is to believe , when he is to die — it is increasingly up to the State to determine .
As a “ medical ethics ” expert at Oxford put it , parental rights are “ at the heart ” of most big medical decisions , however “ there are limits.
” Chris and Connie apparently reached @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authority and now must sit back obediently while their son dies in agony .
“ Limits , ” you see .
You ’ re only a parent up to a certain point , and then your relationship to your child doesn ’ t count for anything anymore .
That ’ s how things are in the U.K. — and the U.S. , as always , is close behind .
( 3 ) This is what happens when human life is not considered sacred .
But what really is the downside of taking the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It may not work , OK , but why not try ?
They raised enough money to pay for everything , including an air ambulance to get the baby to the treatment facility .
Nobody is being burdened here .
Nobody is being forced to do something they don ’ t want to do .
What is there to lose ?
Well , the court answers , it ’ s just not worth the trouble .
They ’ ve weighed all the variables using their various formulations , and they ’ ve decided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through all this trouble on the slim hope of saving this one measly life .
Yes , they ’ ve used the excuse that the baby is “ suffering , ” and I ’ m sure he is suffering , but that doesn ’ t explain why the parents should be prevented from pursuing every option to ease that suffering .
Death is not a treatment plan for suffering .
Death is death .
Death is the destruction of life .
We all must experience it some day , but the inevitability of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dignity of life .
What this really comes down to is that the Powers That Be don ’ t see the fundamental value in life .
That ’ s why you ’ ll hear these people speak more often of the “ dignity ” of death than the dignity of life .
They preach about the “ right ” to die but not the right to live .
And the laws in Europe reflect this emphasis on death instead of life .
Over there , they kill children in the womb and euthanize @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even euthanize alcoholics and depressives and other people who are by no means terminally ill. Once the right to die has been placed over the right to life , death will continue claiming new ground and eating into life more and more .
Death is a destructive force .
What else can it do but consume ?
It ’ s not quite as bad here yet , but we ’ re getting there .
We already kill hundreds of thousands of children in the womb , and we often speak with admiration of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decision to commit suicide .
And we already , in many instances , place the authority of the State over the rights of parents .
Our education system is built around that philosophy .
So , as I said , the stage is set .
Prepare yourself for what ’ s to come .
And pray for Chris and Connie tonight .

Reddit Telegram More Email 145 Shares
There’s a horrific case over in the U.K. that hasn’t gotten a ton of attention here, but it should. If we look closely, we may see our future — and our present.
Charlie Gard is a 10-month-old baby who suffers from a rare genetic disorder called mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome. It’s a horrendous condition that leads to organ malfunction, brain damage, and other symptoms. The hospital that had been treating the boy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London, made the determination that nothing more can be done for him and he must be taken off of life support. He should “die with dignity,” they said. The parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, disagreed.
This is the very crucial thing to understand: they are not insisting that GOSH be forced to keep Charlie on life support. Rather, they want to take him out of the hospital and to America to undergo a form of experimental therapy that a doctor here had already agreed to administer. Chris and Connie raised over $1.6 million to fund this last ditch effort to save their child’s life. All they needed the British hospital to do was release their child into their care, which doesn’t seem like a terribly burdensome request. They would then leave the country and try their luck with treatment here. However slim the chance of success may have been, it was better than just sitting by and watching their baby die.
Here’s where things get truly insane and barbaric. The hospital refused to give Charlie back to his parents. The matter ended up in the courts, and, finally, in the last several hours, the European Court of “Human Rights” ruled that the parents should be barred from taking their son to the United States for treatment. According to the “human rights” court, it is Charlie’s human right that he expire in his hospital bed in London. The parents are not allowed to try and save his life. It is “in his best interest” to simply die, they ruled.
In Europe, “Death with dignity” supersedes all other rights.
In Europe, a mother may kill her baby but she is not allowed to keep him alive.
Again: barbaric.
I have heard many people rationalize this demented decision by saying “the doctors know best.” That may well be relevant and true in situations where family members are trying to force doctors to administer treatments that they, the medical professionals, know will not work. But that is not what’s happening here. The only thing these parents are trying to “force” the doctors to do is relax their grip so the child can be taken to different doctors in a different country. The doctors may be the final authority on what kinds of medical measures they personally should take, but they are not the final authority over life itself. It is one thing for them to say, “I will not do this treatment.” It’s quite another for them to say, “You are not allowed to have this treatment done by anyone. You must die.” The former is reasonable. The latter is euthanasia. This baby is being euthanized. By barbarians.
I’ve seen some on social media calling this case “unimaginable” and “mind boggling.” It is certainly awful, but unfortunately it does not boggle my mind or exceed the limits of my imagination. These sorts of cases are inevitable in Europe, and, unless we make a drastic change of course, they will soon become commonplace here. The stage is already set. Just consider these three factors:
(1) This is what happens with socialized medicine.
If the State runs the health care system, ultimately they will be the ones who decide whose life is worth saving and whose isn’t. That’s not just a byproduct of socialized medicine — it’s the point. And it is especially risky to cede this sort of power to the government when you live in a culture that doesn’t fundamentally value parental rights or human life, which brings us to the last two points.
(2) This is what happens when parental rights are subordinate to the State.
This case came down to the question of who should have the final say over a child. Should it be the parents, or should it be a collection of doctors, judges, and bureaucrats? And if the parents don’t take precedence in a life or death situation, can it really be said that they have rights at all? If I have no say when my child’s very life is at stake, when do I have a say?
The way things are headed in Europe, a parent may have some jurisdiction over the minor minutia of daily life, but when it comes to the major issues — how a child is to be educated, how he is to live, what he is to believe, when he is to die — it is increasingly up to the State to determine. As a “medical ethics” expert at Oxford put it, parental rights are “at the heart” of most big medical decisions, however “there are limits.” Chris and Connie apparently reached the “limits” of their parental authority and now must sit back obediently while their son dies in agony. “Limits,” you see. You’re only a parent up to a certain point, and then your relationship to your child doesn’t count for anything anymore. That’s how things are in the U.K. — and the U.S., as always, is close behind.
(3) This is what happens when human life is not considered sacred.
But what really is the downside of taking the child to the U.S. for treatment? It may not work, OK, but why not try? They raised enough money to pay for everything, including an air ambulance to get the baby to the treatment facility. Nobody is being burdened here. Nobody is being forced to do something they don’t want to do. What is there to lose?
Well, the court answers, it’s just not worth the trouble. They’ve weighed all the variables using their various formulations, and they’ve decided that it makes no sense to go through all this trouble on the slim hope of saving this one measly life. Yes, they’ve used the excuse that the baby is “suffering,” and I’m sure he is suffering, but that doesn’t explain why the parents should be prevented from pursuing every option to ease that suffering. Death is not a treatment plan for suffering. Death is death. Death is the destruction of life. We all must experience it some day, but the inevitability of death does not negate the value and dignity of life.
What this really comes down to is that the Powers That Be don’t see the fundamental value in life. That’s why you’ll hear these people speak more often of the “dignity” of death than the dignity of life. They preach about the “right” to die but not the right to live. And the laws in Europe reflect this emphasis on death instead of life. Over there, they kill children in the womb and euthanize them when they come out. They even euthanize alcoholics and depressives and other people who are by no means terminally ill. Once the right to die has been placed over the right to life, death will continue claiming new ground and eating into life more and more. Death is a destructive force. What else can it do but consume?
It’s not quite as bad here yet, but we’re getting there. We already kill hundreds of thousands of children in the womb, and we often speak with admiration of people who make the “brave” decision to commit suicide. And we already, in many instances, place the authority of the State over the rights of parents. Our education system is built around that philosophy.
So, as I said, the stage is set. Prepare yourself for what’s to come.
And pray for Chris and Connie tonight.


worldtruthtv--2020-09-10--The Royal Family Quietly Broke Down A Glass Ceiling That Was 500 Years Old

The Queen ’ s Guard is an elite military force that is charged with keeping the Queen of England safe .
They ’ re also the ones that millions of tourists see every year performing the changing of the guard at Buckingham Palace .
The Queen ’ s Guard , or something like it , has existed since Henry VIII created the Sovereign Bodyguard in 1509 .
Elite soldiers gain ranks through exemplary service and it remains one of the most prestigious positions in the Queen ’ s Army .
Queen Elizabeth is the current Head of State of all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including Canada , Australia , Barbados and others .
Soldiers from those countries also make up The Queen ’ s Guard .
This year is a special year for Canada and it will mark the northern nation ’ s 150th birthday .
To celebrate the big day , the UK bestowed the honor of commanding The Queen ’ s Guard on a Canadian division of infantry : Princess Patricia ’ s Light Infantry Battalion .
It ended up being a lot bigger gesture than any could have realized , and resulted in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heads up the fighting force , and when they were charged with protecting the Royal Family Captain Coutu became the first female captain of The Queen ’ s Guard in it ’ s 500 year history .
“ I ’ m just focusing on doing my job as best I can and staying humble .
Any of my peers would be absolutely delighted to be Captain of The Queen ’ s Guard and I ’ m equally honored , ” she said .
It wasn ’ t until July of 2016 that women @ @ @ @ @ @ @ combat roles in the UK , so this marks a huge first step for British military .
Couto perfectly ran her troops through the complicated and colorful ceremony of Changing of the Guard .
Millions of people come to London to see the show , and many forget that the guards aren ’ t props , but carefully trained soldiers .
While there ’ s no doubt that Couto is a tough soldier , her promotion also means so much more to women in fighting roles everywhere .

Reddit Telegram More Email 144 Shares
The Queen’s Guard is an elite military force that is charged with keeping the Queen of England safe. They’re also the ones that millions of tourists see every year performing the changing of the guard at Buckingham Palace.
The Queen’s Guard, or something like it, has existed since Henry VIII created the Sovereign Bodyguard in 1509. Elite soldiers gain ranks through exemplary service and it remains one of the most prestigious positions in the Queen’s Army.
Queen Elizabeth is the current Head of State of all countries in the British Commonwealth. Nations including Canada, Australia, Barbados and others. Soldiers from those countries also make up The Queen’s Guard.
This year is a special year for Canada and it will mark the northern nation’s 150th birthday. To celebrate the big day, the UK bestowed the honor of commanding The Queen’s Guard on a Canadian division of infantry: Princess Patricia’s Light Infantry Battalion.
It ended up being a lot bigger gesture than any could have realized, and resulted in a big first step.
Captain Megan Coutu heads up the fighting force, and when they were charged with protecting the Royal Family Captain Coutu became the first female captain of The Queen’s Guard in it’s 500 year history.
“I’m just focusing on doing my job as best I can and staying humble. Any of my peers would be absolutely delighted to be Captain of The Queen’s Guard and I’m equally honored,” she said.
It wasn’t until July of 2016 that women were even allowed to fight in close combat roles in the UK , so this marks a huge first step for British military.
Couto perfectly ran her troops through the complicated and colorful ceremony of Changing of the Guard. Millions of people come to London to see the show, and many forget that the guards aren’t props, but carefully trained soldiers.
While there’s no doubt that Couto is a tough soldier, her promotion also means so much more to women in fighting roles everywhere.


worldtruthtv--2020-09-09--Advanced Ancient Technology Beneath Egypt: 100 Ton Stone Boxes Baffle Researchers

Ultimate evidence a lost ancient technology created before the time of the Dynastic Egyptians .
Inside a tunnel system carved out of the solid limestone bedrock in the desert of Egypt , more than 20 granite boxes made of precision shaped Aswan granite are a true enigma .
Said by some to have been the burial places of prized bulls , their real function is far more intriguing .
B. Foerster .
Ever since people turned towards the study of the ancient Egyptian culture and their achievements through thousands of years , we have been left amazed by everything that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of years ago .
A massive amount of evidence is piling up supporting the idea that our ancestors had in their possession , thousands of years ago a technology that we can only dream about today .
This technology allowed ancient cultures like the ancient Egyptians to cut , transport , stack and place blocks of stones weighing up to ONE HUNDRED TONS .
Mainstream scholars tell us this was achieved by sticks and stones .
However , places like the Serapeum of Saqqara tell a DIFFERENT story .
Ever since its discovery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been a mind-boggling location filled with mystery .
This majestic ancient labyrinth is home to 25 megalithic stone ‘ boxes , ’ weighing between 70 to 100 tons .
The existence of these massive blocks of stone is the ultimate proof that the builders of these incredible ‘ boxes ’ possessed incredible knowledge in fields such as geometry and mathematics , and had the necessary technology to shape , cut , transport and place into position massive blocks of stone .
Some believe the massive boxes were used as burial chambers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brien Foerster suggest the truth behind the Serapeum is beyond fascinating and has nothing to do with alleged burial chambers for bulls .
We know that the boxes were not : they were not burial places of bulls .
It is noteworthy to mention that when the Serapeum of Saqqara was discovered , some of the massive boxes were blown open with gunpowder , only to find the inside of these giant boxes empty .
Researchers have no idea what their actual purpose is now how these giant boxes were assembled thousands of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these boxes are made of rose granite , an extremely hard rock mined at a quarry located about 800 kilometers from Saqqara while other boxes were made from an even stronger material , diorite , found even further away from Saqqara .
This makes you wonder ; what kind of technology was used in the distant past to precisely cut , shape , transport , and place into position massive blocks of stones that weigh up to ONE HUNDRED TONS ?
Is it possible that the knowledge and technology did in fact originate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theorists suggest ?
Or are we missing something in history , an incredibly important moment in ancient history overlooked by mainstream scholars , a moment that could explain the knowledge and ability of ancient civilizations such as the Egyptian ?
To understand this , we have to look back in history to a period called Pre-Pharaonic Egypt .
In Ancient Egypt , long before the first ‘ mortal ’ Pharaoh known as Menes-Narmer ruled over the lands of Egypt there were other kings , deities and “ those who came from above ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Egypt today .
This time in history , the pre-pharaonic period remains a great mystery for most scholars and Egyptologist , mostly because they can not accept that what is written since it goes directly against the beliefs of most historians , archaeologists , and Egyptologists .
The time before 3000 BC , the date when the first official Pharaoh appeared in Egypt is a great enigma .

Reddit Telegram More Email 495 Shares
Ultimate evidence a lost ancient technology created before the time of the Dynastic Egyptians. Inside a tunnel system carved out of the solid limestone bedrock in the desert of Egypt, more than 20 granite boxes made of precision shaped Aswan granite are a true enigma. Said by some to have been the burial places of prized bulls, their real function is far more intriguing. B. Foerster.
Ever since people turned towards the study of the ancient Egyptian culture and their achievements through thousands of years, we have been left amazed by everything that ancient cultures were able to achieve thousands of years ago.
A massive amount of evidence is piling up supporting the idea that our ancestors had in their possession, thousands of years ago a technology that we can only dream about today.
This technology allowed ancient cultures like the ancient Egyptians to cut, transport, stack and place blocks of stones weighing up to ONE HUNDRED TONS.
Mainstream scholars tell us this was achieved by sticks and stones. However, places like the Serapeum of Saqqara tell a DIFFERENT story.
Ever since its discovery in 1850, the Serapeum of Saqqara has been a mind-boggling location filled with mystery.
This majestic ancient labyrinth is home to 25 megalithic stone ‘boxes,’ weighing between 70 to 100 tons. The existence of these massive blocks of stone is the ultimate proof that the builders of these incredible ‘boxes’ possessed incredible knowledge in fields such as geometry and mathematics, and had the necessary technology to shape, cut, transport and place into position massive blocks of stone.
Some believe the massive boxes were used as burial chambers, other’s like author and explorer Brien Foerster suggest the truth behind the Serapeum is beyond fascinating and has nothing to do with alleged burial chambers for bulls.
We know that the boxes were not: they were not burial places of bulls.
It is noteworthy to mention that when the Serapeum of Saqqara was discovered, some of the massive boxes were blown open with gunpowder, only to find the inside of these giant boxes empty.
Researchers have no idea what their actual purpose is now how these giant boxes were assembled thousands of years ago.
Interestingly, most of these boxes are made of rose granite, an extremely hard rock mined at a quarry located about 800 kilometers from Saqqara while other boxes were made from an even stronger material, diorite, found even further away from Saqqara.
This makes you wonder; what kind of technology was used in the distant past to precisely cut, shape, transport, and place into position massive blocks of stones that weigh up to ONE HUNDRED TONS?
Is it possible that the knowledge and technology did in fact originate from the stars as many ancient astronaut theorists suggest? Or are we missing something in history, an incredibly important moment in ancient history overlooked by mainstream scholars, a moment that could explain the knowledge and ability of ancient civilizations such as the Egyptian?
Brien Foerster illustrates it:
“Inside a tunnel system carved out of the solid limestone bedrock in the desert of Egypt, more than 20 granite boxes made of precision shaped Aswan granite are a true enigma. Said by some to have been the burial places of prized bulls, their real function is far more intriguing. And they are clear examples of Lost Ancient High Technology created before the time of the Dynastic Egyptians.”
To understand this, we have to look back in history to a period called Pre-Pharaonic Egypt.
In Ancient Egypt, long before the first ‘mortal’ Pharaoh known as Menes-Narmer ruled over the lands of Egypt there were other kings, deities and “those who came from above” who ruled over the land known as Egypt today.
This time in history, the pre-pharaonic period remains a great mystery for most scholars and Egyptologist, mostly because they cannot accept that what is written since it goes directly against the beliefs of most historians, archaeologists, and Egyptologists.
The time before 3000 BC, the date when the first official Pharaoh appeared in Egypt is a great enigma.
sources:
hiddenincatours.com
www.ancient-code.com


worldtruthtv--2020-09-09--The Lung Cleansing Drink That Anyone Who Smokes Or Who Has Ever Smoked Needs To Try

We all know that smoking is arguably the deadliest habit on the planet .
That doesn ’ t stop a lot of us from doing it , though .
Over 16 million people in the United States suffer from health issues caused by smoking .
For every person it kills , a minimum of 30 people lives with a severe smoking related illness .
Even though we ’ re cutting back on cigarettes , they still linger .
The damage it does to your lungs is often serious and irreversible .
But for smokers and ex-smokers , you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that can help you cleanse your lungs of these toxins .
Three main ingredients make the drink work : turmeric , ginger , and onion .
All three are packed with various health benefits , but combined they form a potent and tasty lung cleansing beverage .
Turmeric is a spice from India that is widely known for its vibrant gold color .
It ’ s also praised for its health benefits , as many as 600 of them !
It ’ s high in minerals and vitamins and has anticancer , antibacterial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ isn ’ t a part of your daily life already , it should be !
Ginger is most commonly used for settling an upset stomach , but it can do so much more .
One , in particular , is the ability to reduce excess mucus in your lungs , which can happen as a result of smoking .
Finally , onions have powerful antioxidant and anticancer properties .
It ’ s been used to treat some cancers , showing it can inhibit further growth of the cells .
Not bad for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you cry and being self-conscious of your breath .
• • Mix the sweetener into the water and heat until boiling • Chop the ginger and onion and add to the mixture , bring back to a boil • Add the turmeric and lower the heat to medium • Heat until there is only half the original amount left • Let it cool to room temperature then place in the fridge • Consume 2 tbsp .
daily , once in the morning and once in the evening , at least 2 hours after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it ’ s never too late to quit .
It won ’ t be easy , but it will benefit you in the end .
This drink is a great start for smokers and a better one for ex-smokers .
Try it yourself and start breathing a little easier !

Reddit Telegram More Email 4K Shares
We all know that smoking is arguably the deadliest habit on the planet. That doesn’t stop a lot of us from doing it, though. Over 16 million people in the United States suffer from health issues caused by smoking. For every person it kills, a minimum of 30 people lives with a severe smoking related illness.
Even though we’re cutting back on cigarettes, they still linger. The damage it does to your lungs is often serious and irreversible. But for smokers and ex-smokers, you’re in luck! There is a drink that can help you cleanse your lungs of these toxins.
What’s in the Drink?
Three main ingredients make the drink work: turmeric, ginger, and onion. All three are packed with various health benefits, but combined they form a potent and tasty lung cleansing beverage.
Turmeric is a spice from India that is widely known for its vibrant gold color. It’s also praised for its health benefits, as many as 600 of them! It’s high in minerals and vitamins and has anticancer, antibacterial and antiviral properties. If this spice isn’t a part of your daily life already, it should be!
Ginger is most commonly used for settling an upset stomach, but it can do so much more. One, in particular, is the ability to reduce excess mucus in your lungs, which can happen as a result of smoking.
Finally, onions have powerful antioxidant and anticancer properties. It’s been used to treat some cancers, showing it can inhibit further growth of the cells. Not bad for a vegetable that’s known for making you cry and being self-conscious of your breath.
How to make
Ingredients
2 tbsp. of turmeric
400g of onion
Thumb sized ginger root 400g of natural sweetener (honey, maple syrup, xylitol, stevia, lo han, etc.) 1L of water Preparation Mix the sweetener into the water and heat until boiling Chop the ginger and onion and add to the mixture, bring back to a boil Add the turmeric and lower the heat to medium Heat until there is only half the original amount left Strain what’s left into a glass container Let it cool to room temperature then place in the fridge Consume 2 tbsp. daily, once in the morning and once in the evening, at least 2 hours after a meal Smoking may be addictive, but it’s never too late to quit. It won’t be easy, but it will benefit you in the end. This drink is a great start for smokers and a better one for ex-smokers. Try it yourself and start breathing a little easier!
Sources:
www.yahoo.com
jpsionline.com
www.koreascience.or.kr