russiainsider--2020-01-20--It's Not Just the Jews, Another Reason for the US's Endless Wars: Without Them, the $US Would Collap

It's Not Just the Jews, Another Reason for the US's Endless Wars: Without Them, the $US Would Collapse

At Counterpunch , Michael Hudson has that outlines the important connections between US foreign policy , oil , and the US dollar .
In short , US foreign policy is geared very much toward controlling oil resources as part of a larger strategy to prop up the US dollar .
Hudson writes : The assassination was intended to escalate America ’ s presence in Iraq to keep control of the region ’ s oil reserves , and to back Saudi Arabia ’ s Wahabi troops ( Isis , Al Quaeda in Iraq , Al Nusra and other divisions of what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) to support U.S. control of Near Eastern oil as a buttress of the U.S. dollar .
That remains the key to understanding this policy , and why it is in the process of escalating , not dying down .
The actual context for the neocon ’ s action was the balance of payments , and the role of oil and energy as a long-term lever of American diplomacy .
Basically , the US 's propensity for driving up massive budget deficits has created a need for immense amounts of deficit spending .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of government debt , or through monetizing the debt .
But what if there is n't enough global demand for US debt ?
That would mean the US would have to pay more interest on its debt .
Or , the US could monetize the debt through the central bank .
But that might cause the value of the dollar to crash .
So , the US regime realized that it must find ways to prevent the glut of dollars and debt from actually destroying the value of the dollar .
Fortunately for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ managed , it turns out , through foreign policy .
Hudson continues : The solution [ to the problem of maintaining the demand for dollars ] turned out to be to replace gold with U.S. Treasury securities ( IOUs ) as the basis of foreign central bank reserves .
After 1971 , foreign central banks had little option for what to do with their continuing dollar inflows except to recycle them to the U.S. economy by buying U.S. Treasury securities .
The effect of U.S. foreign military spending thus did not undercut the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not even force the Treasury and Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to attract foreign exchange to offset the dollar outflows on military account .
In fact , U.S. foreign military spending helped finance the domestic U.S. federal budget deficit .
An important piece of this strategy has been a continued alliance with Saudi Arabia .
Saudi Arabia maintains the world 's largest capacity for oil production , and it was the largest single producer of crude for most of the period from the mid-1970s to 2018 , when the US surpassed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Saudi Arabia remains under the US thumb : what Saudi Arabia does not save in dollarized assets with its oil-export earnings is spent on buying hundreds of billion of dollars of U.S. arms exports .
This locks them into dependence on U.S. supply [ of ] replacement parts and repairs , and enables the United States to turn off Saudi military hardware at any point of time , in the event that the Saudis may try to act independently of U.S. foreign policy .
So maintaining the dollar as the world ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military spending .
Foreign countries do not have to pay the Pentagon directly for this spending .
They simply finance the U.S. Treasury and U.S. banking system .
However , any move away from this status quo tends to be met with paranoia and intervention from the US : But the role of oil-producing states goes beyond merely churning dollars and US debt to keep the dollar afloat .
These countries also provide the foot soldiers for many US interventions in terms of terrorists and guerrilla fighters who can be used against US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ War showed that modern democracies can not field armies for any major military conflict , because this would require a draft of its citizens .
That would lead any government attempting such a draft to be voted out of power .
And without troops , it is not possible to invade a country to take it over .
The corollary of this perception is that democracies have only two choices when it comes to military strategy : They can only wage airpower , bombing opponents ; or they can create a foreign legion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back foreign governments that provide this military service .
That is , the US regime can certainly get away with lots of bombing operations and other low-manpower operations .
But anything that might require conscription is a political nonstarter .
Hudson notes that Saudi Arabia , with its particularly rabid and extreme strain of Islam is quite useful : Here once again Saudi Arabia plays a critical role , through its control of Wahabi Sunnis turned into terrorist jihadis willing to sabotage , bomb , assassinate , blow up and otherwise fight any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Islam , ” the euphemism for Saudi Arabia acting as U.S. client state .
( Religion really is not the key ; I know of no ISIS or similar Wahabi attack on Israeli targets . )
The United States needs the Saudis to supply or finance Wahabi crazies .
So in addition to playing a key role in the U.S. balance of payments by recycling its oil-export earnings into U.S. stocks , bonds and other investments , Saudi Arabia provides manpower by supporting the Wahabi members of America ’ s foreign legion , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ democratic ” mode of today 's U.S. military policy .
Hudson also notes that the term `` democracy , '' when used in the context of foreign policy , has very little to do with what a normal person would regard as democracy .
Rather ,

At Counterpunch, Michael Hudson has penned an important article that outlines the important connections between US foreign policy, oil, and the US dollar.
In short, US foreign policy is geared very much toward controlling oil resources as part of a larger strategy to prop up the US dollar. Hudson writes:
The assassination was intended to escalate America’s presence in Iraq to keep control of the region’s oil reserves, and to back Saudi Arabia’s Wahabi troops (Isis, Al Quaeda in Iraq, Al Nusra and other divisions of what are actually America’s foreign legion) to support U.S. control of Near Eastern oil as a buttress of the U.S. dollar. That remains the key to understanding this policy, and why it is in the process of escalating, not dying down. The actual context for the neocon’s action was the balance of payments, and the role of oil and energy as a long-term lever of American diplomacy.
Basically, the US's propensity for driving up massive budget deficits has created a need for immense amounts of deficit spending. This can be handled through selling lots of government debt, or through monetizing the debt. But what if there isn't enough global demand for US debt? That would mean the US would have to pay more interest on its debt. Or, the US could monetize the debt through the central bank. But that might cause the value of the dollar to crash. So, the US regime realized that it must find ways to prevent the glut of dollars and debt from actually destroying the value of the dollar. Fortunately for the regime, this can be partly managed, it turns out, through foreign policy. Hudson continues:
The solution [to the problem of maintaining the demand for dollars] turned out to be to replace gold with U.S. Treasury securities (IOUs) as the basis of foreign central bank reserves. After 1971, foreign central banks had little option for what to do with their continuing dollar inflows except to recycle them to the U.S. economy by buying U.S. Treasury securities. The effect of U.S. foreign military spending thus did not undercut the dollar’s exchange rate, and did not even force the Treasury and Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to attract foreign exchange to offset the dollar outflows on military account. In fact, U.S. foreign military spending helped finance the domestic U.S. federal budget deficit.
An important piece of this strategy has been a continued alliance with Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia maintains the world's largest capacity for oil production, and it was the largest single producer of crude for most of the period from the mid-1970s to 2018, when the US surpassed both Saudi Arabia and Russia.
But Saudi Arabia remains under the US thumb:
what Saudi Arabia does not save in dollarized assets with its oil-export earnings is spent on buying hundreds of billion of dollars of U.S. arms exports. This locks them into dependence on U.S. supply [of] replacement parts and repairs, and enables the United States to turn off Saudi military hardware at any point of time, in the event that the Saudis may try to act independently of U.S. foreign policy. So maintaining the dollar as the world’s reserve currency became a mainstay of U.S. military spending. Foreign countries do not have to pay the Pentagon directly for this spending. They simply finance the U.S. Treasury and U.S. banking system.
However, any move away from this status quo tends to be met with paranoia and intervention from the US:
Fear of this development was a major reason why the United States moved against Libya, whose foreign reserves were held in gold, not dollars, and which was urging other African countries to follow suit in order to free themselves from “Dollar Diplomacy.” Hillary and Obama invaded, grabbed their gold supplies (we still have no idea who ended up with these billions of dollars' worth of gold) and destroyed Libya's government, its public education system, its public infrastructure …
But the role of oil-producing states goes beyond merely churning dollars and US debt to keep the dollar afloat. These countries also provide the foot soldiers for many US interventions in terms of terrorists and guerrilla fighters who can be used against US enemies. Hudson declares:
The Vietnam War showed that modern democracies cannot field armies for any major military conflict, because this would require a draft of its citizens. That would lead any government attempting such a draft to be voted out of power. And without troops, it is not possible to invade a country to take it over. The corollary of this perception is that democracies have only two choices when it comes to military strategy: They can only wage airpower, bombing opponents; or they can create a foreign legion, that is, hire mercenaries or back foreign governments that provide this military service.
That is, the US regime can certainly get away with lots of bombing operations and other low-manpower operations. But anything that might require conscription is a political nonstarter. Hudson notes that Saudi Arabia, with its particularly rabid and extreme strain of Islam is quite useful:
Here once again Saudi Arabia plays a critical role, through its control of Wahabi Sunnis turned into terrorist jihadis willing to sabotage, bomb, assassinate, blow up and otherwise fight any target designated as an enemy of “Islam,” the euphemism for Saudi Arabia acting as U.S. client state. (Religion really is not the key; I know of no ISIS or similar Wahabi attack on Israeli targets.) The United States needs the Saudis to supply or finance Wahabi crazies. So in addition to playing a key role in the U.S. balance of payments by recycling its oil-export earnings into U.S. stocks, bonds and other investments, Saudi Arabia provides manpower by supporting the Wahabi members of America’s foreign legion, ISIS and Al-Nusra/Al-Qaeda. Terrorism has become the “democratic” mode of today's U.S. military policy.
Hudson also notes that the term "democracy," when used in the context of foreign policy, has very little to do with what a normal person would regard as democracy. Rather,
From the U.S. vantage point, what is a “democracy”? In today’s Orwellian vocabulary, it means any country supporting U.S. foreign policy. … The antonym to “democracy” is “terrorist.” That simply means a nation willing to fight to become independent from U.S. neoliberal democracy.


russiainsider--2020-01-20--More Babies Is Top National Priority, Putin Declares at 'State of the Union' Speech

Addressing the Federal Assembly on Tuesday , President Putin began the substantive part of his speech by focusing on demography : Russia ’ s future and historical perspective depend on how many of us there are ( I would like to start the main part of my Address with demography ) , how many children are born in Russian families in one , five or ten years , on these children ’ s upbringing , on what kind of people they become and what they will do for the country , as well as on the values they choose as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nearly 147 million of us now .
But we have entered a difficult , a very difficult demographic period .
The measures we took starting in the mid-2000s have had a positive effect on demography .
We have even reached a stage of natural increase .
This is why we have more children at schools now .
As the nation 's leader , he emphasized that the population is not merely one concern out of many .
Rather , Putin said that every new government policy needs to take population concerns into consideration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia is experiencing a challenging demographic outlook .
Previously , it was still possible to reach a positive trend and even achieve a natural increase .
This happened thanks to the measures that the authorities took , starting in the mid-2000s .
Therefore , there are more and more schoolchildren .
But today , there are still some significant difficulties .
Explaining the essence of the problem , the President of the Russian Federation said that only a small percentage of people from the 1990s generation are now creating new families .
Thus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again .
As a result , the total fertility rate in 2019 amounted to 1.5 .
Note that the total fertility rate is defined as the average number of births per woman over her entire life .
For comparison , he cited numbers from previous points in Russia 's history : I can tell you by way of comparison that the figure was 1.3 in 1943 , during the Great Patriotic War .
It was only lower in the 1990s : 1.16 in 1999 , lower even than during the Great Patriotic War @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were very few families with two children , and some couples had to put off starting a family .
While the current birthrate is higher than it was decades ago , the president reminded listeners that this number is not high enough for the ongoing strength and stability of the country .
At minimum , to keep population stable over a long period of time , birthrates eventually need to be raised back up to 2.1 or better .
The President set a short-term goal for the country : All measures of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family support system .
This was stated by President Vladimir Putin this Tuesday , speaking in his Message to the Federal Assembly .
`` The point of all , I want to emphasize this , of all the measures we are taking is to create a harmonious , large-scale and , most importantly , efficiently working family support system in Russia , '' Putin said , noting that the incomes of citizens , especially those with children , should be enough for a decent life .
He noted that only the strengthening of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the development of Russia as a large and successful country .
Thus , he said it is necessary to ensure an increase in the birth rate by the middle of the decade .

Addressing the Federal Assembly on Tuesday, President Putin began the substantive part of his speech by focusing on demography:
Russia’s future and historical perspective depend on how many of us there are (I would like to start the main part of my Address with demography), how many children are born in Russian families in one, five or ten years, on these children’s upbringing, on what kind of people they become and what they will do for the country, as well as on the values they choose as their mainstay in life. There are nearly 147 million of us now. But we have entered a difficult, a very difficult demographic period. The measures we took starting in the mid-2000s have had a positive effect on demography. We have even reached a stage of natural increase. This is why we have more children at schools now.
As the nation's leader, he emphasized that the population is not merely one concern out of many. Rather, Putin said that every new government policy needs to take population concerns into consideration, as being of central importance:
Each step we take and each new law or government program we adopt must be scrutinized from the viewpoint of our top national priority – the preservation and increase of Russia’s population.
Russia is experiencing a challenging demographic outlook. Previously, it was still possible to reach a positive trend and even achieve a natural increase. This happened thanks to the measures that the authorities took, starting in the mid-2000s. Therefore, there are more and more schoolchildren.
But today, there are still some significant difficulties. Explaining the essence of the problem, the President of the Russian Federation said that only a small percentage of people from the 1990s generation are now creating new families. Thus the number of births started turning downwards again. As a result, the total fertility rate in 2019 amounted to 1.5.
Note that the total fertility rate is defined as the average number of births per woman over her entire life.
For comparison, he cited numbers from previous points in Russia's history:
I can tell you by way of comparison that the figure was 1.3 in 1943, during the Great Patriotic War. It was only lower in the 1990s: 1.16 in 1999, lower even than during the Great Patriotic War [World War II]. There were very few families with two children, and some couples had to put off starting a family.
While the current birthrate is higher than it was decades ago, the president reminded listeners that this number is not high enough for the ongoing strength and stability of the country. At minimum, to keep population stable over a long period of time, birthrates eventually need to be raised back up to 2.1 or better.
The President set a short-term goal for the country:
It is our historic duty to respond to this challenge. We must not only get out of this demographic trap but ensure a sustainable natural population growth by 2025. The aggregate birth rate must be 1.7 in 2024.
All measures of the authorities are aimed at creating an effective family support system. This was stated by President Vladimir Putin this Tuesday, speaking in his Message to the Federal Assembly.
"The point of all, I want to emphasize this, of all the measures we are taking is to create a harmonious, large-scale and, most importantly, efficiently working family support system in Russia," Putin said, noting that the incomes of citizens, especially those with children, should be enough for a decent life.
He noted that only the strengthening of the institution of the family can guarantee the development of Russia as a large and successful country. Thus, he said it is necessary to ensure an increase in the birth rate by the middle of the decade.


russiainsider--2020-01-21--Putin Gives Prestigious Award to American Photographer of Exquisite Russian Churches

The President of Russia has taken notice — Professor William Brumfield captured the best and most extensive collection of photos of the sublime beauty of Russian church architecture , large and small ... Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a decree , granting federal awards on behalf of the Russian Federation .
The Order of Friendship was awarded to William Kraft Brumfield , professor at the Department of Slavic and German Studies at Tulane University ( USA ) .
He was granted this award because of his merits in strengthening friendship and cooperation between peoples , and fruitful activities for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Some of his most stunning photos can be seen in these articles : • The Extraordinary American Professor Who Photographed the Striking Christian Architecture of Russia 's North • A Treasure of Old Christian Paintings in a Russian Church in a Remote Forest • Monastery of Sts .
Boris and Gleb in Torzhok : in Memory of Murdered Princes • A Magical Siberian Village and Its Amazing Wooden Church - Lost In Time • The Trinity-Ipatiev Monastery in Kostroma : Refuge for the Romanovs More than 30 years ago , he became @ @ @ @ @ @ @ North and realized that he could use photography to capture its unique churches and monasteries .
Since then , he has been traveling tirelessly around Russia , photographing preserved architectural monuments , publishing books about them , and giving lectures around the world .
As a student from the University of California , Brumfield first came to the USSR in 1970 .
Shortly before the trip , he had purchased his first film camera , and the shots he brought back from the Soviet Union created a sensation at the university where he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ photography of architectural monuments was his vocation , and having already received a doctorate in Slavic studies ( as a philologist studying Russian language and literature ) , Dr. Brumfield then began to study Russian architecture .
In 1983 , Brumfield 's first book was published — Gold in Azure : A Thousand Years of Russian Architecture — exquisitely illustrated with his stunning photographs .
He proceeded to make hundreds of trips to the most remote corners of Russia , taking thousands of photographs , and writing dozens of articles , publications , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's breathtaking photography can be viewed here : • History in Carvings : The Cathedral of the Dormition in Vladimir • Miracle at Tsypino : The Resurrection of a Russian Wooden Church • Zaraisk : Ancient Citadel with Ties to Some of Russia 's Greatest Figures • The Magnificent Frescoes of Yaroslavl : St. John the Baptist at Tolchkovo • The History of a Beautiful Ancient Monastery Told Through Photos While pursuing his work , William Brumfield lived in the USSR and Russia for more than 15 years , taking pictures in both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ times of the day , catching the light , finding new angles .
“ In a way , I ’ m a unique person — what I do , nobody does , ” Brumfield admits .
`` I created my way , and I do n't get too tired to popularize my work .
Not everyone likes it .
Trying to engage Americans with Russian culture is often not promising .
But I found my refuge , I found allies who help me , and I became a well known specialist in my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work inspires me .
I call it God 's providence .
”

The President of Russia has taken notice — Professor William Brumfield captured the best and most extensive collection of photos of the sublime beauty of Russian church architecture, large and small ...
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a decree, granting federal awards on behalf of the Russian Federation. The Order of Friendship was awarded to William Kraft Brumfield, professor at the Department of Slavic and German Studies at Tulane University (USA).
He was granted this award because of his merits in strengthening friendship and cooperation between peoples, and fruitful activities for bringing people together from various national cultures.
Some of his most stunning photos can be seen in these articles:
More than 30 years ago, he became interested in the architecture of the Russian North and realized that he could use photography to capture its unique churches and monasteries. Since then, he has been traveling tirelessly around Russia, photographing preserved architectural monuments, publishing books about them, and giving lectures around the world.
As a student from the University of California, Brumfield first came to the USSR in 1970. Shortly before the trip, he had purchased his first film camera, and the shots he brought back from the Soviet Union created a sensation at the university where he studied.
Having come to understand that photography of architectural monuments was his vocation, and having already received a doctorate in Slavic studies (as a philologist studying Russian language and literature), Dr. Brumfield then began to study Russian architecture. In 1983, Brumfield's first book was published — Gold in Azure: A Thousand Years of Russian Architecture — exquisitely illustrated with his stunning photographs.
He proceeded to make hundreds of trips to the most remote corners of Russia, taking thousands of photographs, and writing dozens of articles, publications, and books.
More of Professor Brumfield's breathtaking photography can be viewed here:
While pursuing his work, William Brumfield lived in the USSR and Russia for more than 15 years, taking pictures in both winter and in summer, at different times of the day, catching the light, finding new angles.
“In a way, I’m a unique person — what I do, nobody does,” Brumfield admits. "I created my way, and I don't get too tired to popularize my work. Not everyone likes it. Trying to engage Americans with Russian culture is often not promising. But I found my refuge, I found allies who help me, and I became a well known specialist in my field. And so far, my work inspires me. I call it God's providence.”


russiainsider--2020-01-21--Winston Churchill's Famous 1920 Article Explaining that There Are 'Good Jews', and 'Bad Jews'

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews .
It is certainly a very great one ; it probably outweighs all others .
With the notable exception of Lenin , the majority of the leading figures are Jews .
Moreover , the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . ''
`` This ( revolutionary ) movement among the Jews is not new ...
It played a definitely recognisable part in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century ; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire .
First published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald ( London ) , February 8 , 1920 .
Churchill 's original headline for this articles was : 'Zionism versus Bolshevism . '
Later in his career , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ part Jewish himself , relied on wealthy Jews to finance his political career , doing their bidding in trying to start a war with Germany .
This article was written in less cynical times .
He was 46 when he wrote it .
SOME people like Jews and some do not ; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world .
Disraeli , the Jew Prime Minister of England , and Leader @ @ @ @ @ @ @ always true to his race and proud of his origin , said on a well-known occasion : “ The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.
” Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia , where of all countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated , and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country , which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times , we must admit that nothing that has since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has falsified the truth of Disraeli ’ s confident assertion .
The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish race .
The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified .
We owe to the Jews in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which , even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural , would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind , worth in fact the fruits of all other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that system and by that faith there has been built out of the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilisation .
And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy , as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent , which , if not arrested , would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible .
It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations , both of the divine and the diabolical .
There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognisable share in the qualities which make up the national character .
There are all sorts of men – good , bad and , for the most part , indifferent – in every country , and in every race .
Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual , on account of race or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on his personal merits and conduct .
In a people of peculiar genius like the Jews , contrasts are more vivid , the extremes are more widely separated , the resulting consequences are more decisive .
At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jews , two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity , and the third absolutely destructive .
First there are the Jews who , dwelling in every country throughout the world , identify themselves with that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and , while adhering faithfully to their own religion , regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them .
Such a Jew living in England would say , “ I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith.
” This is a worthy conception , and useful in the highest degree .
We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the “ National Jews ” in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part , some rising to the command of armies , others winning the Victoria Cross for valour .
The National Russian Jews , in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered , have managed to play an honourable and useful part in the national life even of Russia .
As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia ’ s economic resources and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations , the Russian Co-operative Societies .
In politics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most part , to liberal and progressive movements , and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain .
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews .
The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race .
Most , if not all , of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers , and divorced from their minds all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This movement among the Jews is not new .
From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx , and down to Trotsky ( Russia ) , Bela Kun ( Hungary ) , Rosa Luxembourg ( Germany ) , and Emma Goldman ( United States ) , this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development , of envious malevolence , and impossible equality , has been steadily growing .
It played , as a modern writer , Mrs. Webster , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution .
It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century ; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire .
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jews .
It is certainly a very great one ; it probably outweighs all others .
With the notable exception of Lenin , the majority of the leading figures are Jews .
Moreover , the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders .
Thus Tchitcherin , a pure Russian , is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff , and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski can not be compared with the power of Trotsky , or of Zinovieff , the Dictator of the Red Citadel ( Petrograd ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all Jews .
In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing .
And the prominent , if not indeed the principal , part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews , and in some notable cases by Jewesses .
The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary .
The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany ( especially in Bavaria ) , so far as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ upon the temporary prostration of the German people .
Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries , the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing .
Needless to say , the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people .
Wherever General Denikin ’ s authority could reach , protection was always accorded to the Jewish population , and strenuous efforts were made by his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those guilty of them .
So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews .
The Misses Healy , nieces of Mr. Tim Healy , in relating their personal experiences in Kieff , have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front .
But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs .
The brigand Makhno , the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff , who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres , everywhere found among the half-stupefied , half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms .
The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which are now being perpetrated .
This is an injustice on millions of helpless people , most of whom are themselves sufferers from the revolutionary regime .
It becomes , therefore , specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations .
And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time .
Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race .
In violent contrast to international communism , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a commanding character .
It has fallen to the British Government , as the result of the conquest of Palestine , to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and a centre of national life .
The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity .
Declarations have been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain .
The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann , the leader , for practical purposes , of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most prominent British Jews , and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby , are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement .
Of course , Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race , nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there .
But if , as may well happen , there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jews , an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would , from every point of view , be beneficial , and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire .
Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia , as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system .
Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally , and Dr. Weissmann in particular .
The cruel penetration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal , which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler , a truer , and a far more attainable goal .
The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people .
It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on every occasion , as many of them in England have already done , and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy .
In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement , but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race .
But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough .
Positive and practicable alternatives are needed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the social sphere ; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe , but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory , a task is presented on which many blessings rest .

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders."
"This (revolutionary) movement among the Jews is not new... It played a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
First published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920. Churchill's original headline for this articles was: 'Zionism versus Bolshevism.' Later in his career, in the late 30s, Churchill, possibly part Jewish himself, relied on wealthy Jews to finance his political career, doing their bidding in trying to start a war with Germany. This article was written in less cynical times. He was 46 when he wrote it.
SOME people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.
Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.” Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all countries in the world the Jews were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli’s confident assertion.
Good and Bad Jews.
The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified. We owe to the Jews in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together. On that system and by that faith there has been built out of the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilisation.
And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.
"National" Jews.
There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognisable share in the qualities which make up the national character. There are all sorts of men – good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent – in every country, and in every race. Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct. In a people of peculiar genius like the Jews, contrasts are more vivid, the extremes are more widely separated, the resulting consequences are more decisive.
At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jews, two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity, and the third absolutely destructive.
First there are the Jews who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life, and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jew living in England would say, “I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith.” This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the “National Jews” in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jewish soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.
The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and useful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.
International Jews.
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world.
This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
Terrorist Jews.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.
Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.
"Protector of the Jews."
Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin’s authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews.
The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, in relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms.
The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated. This is an injustice on millions of helpless people, most of whom are themselves sufferers from the revolutionary regime. It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jewish movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations. And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time.
A Home for the Jews.
Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. It has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and a centre of national life.
The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project, backed by many of the most prominent British Jews, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.
Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.
Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular.
The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.
Duty of Loyal Jews.
It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race.
But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.


russiainsider--2020-01-21--A Single Chinese Naval Yard Is Building More Destroyers Than Are in the Entire British Navy

Checkpoint Asia is an excellent new site which scours the media for the best Asia news with a geopolitical focus , plus 1st-class original journalism ranging from Russia to China to the Middle East .
Smart , incisive , and free of globalist baloney .
Reader-supported , please donate !
They have a great Facebook page , with very good memes .
Editor ’ s note : Alongside South Korea , China is the world ’ s largest shipbuilder with the vast majority of that accounted by civilian ships .
As such it is quite easy for China to ramp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a slump in the civilian demand as it the case right now .
According to some analysis China ’ s naval buildup is still less than the spare capacity of the civilian yards .
While the U.S. Navy launches a handful of AEGIS destroyers each year , the single image below of a Shanghai shipyard shows nine newly constructed Chinese warships .
China ’ s Navy , known as the PLAN ( People ’ s Liberation Army Navy ) , is modernizing at an impressive rate .
And on a vast scale @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a fleet of large destroyers , amphibious warships and aircraft carriers .
The below photo , snapped from an airplane window on December 13 , and shared on social media , captures the vast scale of this construction .
Nearest the camera , a line of four newly constructed destroyers catch the sunlight .
Two are Type-052D air-defense destroyers , generally equivalent to the U.S. Navy ’ s Arleigh Burke Class AEGIS destroyers .
These displace 7,500 tons and can carry 64 large missiles including long range surface to air missiles ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other two are larger Type-055 Class ships .
These are also described as air-defense destroyers but are verging on cruisers in terms of size and fit .
These are about twice the displacement and carry over 100 large missiles .
Behind them is the shipyard with its mass of construction halls and cranes .
In the basin where the newest ships are docked after launch are another four destroyers .
Again there are both Type-052D and Type-055 ships .
Together with another Type-055 under construction on the left of the image , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ visible to 9 .
To put that into context , the Royal Navy ’ s entire destroyer fleet is just 6 ships .
And this yard is just part of a much bigger construction program .
There are also some hovercraft which will be carried aboard the PLAN ’ s expanding fleet of amphibious warships .
They will be used for transporting tanks and supplies from ship to shore .
These are generally similar to the U.S. Navy ’ s Landing Craft Air Cushion ( LCAC ) .
At the side of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a massive Yuan Wang Class satellite and/or missile tracking ship .
These are the sort of ships which look like an ocean liner but with a series of gigantic satellite dishes pointing skyward .
When completed this could be used to support missile tests .
But the most impressive vessel is hidden in the background haze , barely discernible to the untrained eye .
Beneath several massive gantry cranes in a purpose-built construction area is China ’ s next-generation aircraft carrier .
China already has two carriers in service but this new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Known as the Type-003 , it is believed to have electromagnetic catapults like the latest U.S. Navy Ford Class carrier .
It is not expected to be launched for some time .
Other developments are not visible in the photo .
It is the same shipyard where China ’ s mysterious sailless submarine has been constructed .
Although that submarine is not clearly apparent in the photograph , it may be present in the basin .
This image paints an interesting picture of Chinese naval modernization .
Yet the biggest takeaway is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There are many yards across China which are similarly impressive .
The Chinese Navy of today , and the future , is changed beyond all recognition from the Chinese Navy of the past .
The world naval balance is shifting .

Checkpoint Asia is an excellent new site which scours the media for the best Asia news with a geopolitical focus, plus 1st-class original journalism ranging from Russia to China to the Middle East. Smart, incisive, and free of globalist baloney. Reader-supported, please donate! They have a great Facebook page, with very good memes.
Editor’s note: Alongside South Korea, China is the world’s largest shipbuilder with the vast majority of that accounted by civilian ships. As such it is quite easy for China to ramp up naval shipbuilding, especially when there is a slump in the civilian demand as it the case right now. According to some analysis China’s naval buildup is still less than the spare capacity of the civilian yards.
While the U.S. Navy launches a handful of AEGIS destroyers each year, the single image below of a Shanghai shipyard shows nine newly constructed Chinese warships. China’s Navy, known as the PLAN (People’s Liberation Army Navy), is modernizing at an impressive rate. And on a vast scale. A key ingredient is the construction of a fleet of large destroyers, amphibious warships and aircraft carriers. The below photo, snapped from an airplane window on December 13, and shared on social media, captures the vast scale of this construction.
Nearest the camera, a line of four newly constructed destroyers catch the sunlight. Two are Type-052D air-defense destroyers, generally equivalent to the U.S. Navy’s Arleigh Burke Class AEGIS destroyers. These displace 7,500 tons and can carry 64 large missiles including long range surface to air missiles (SAMs) and cruise missiles. The other two are larger Type-055 Class ships. These are also described as air-defense destroyers but are verging on cruisers in terms of size and fit. These are about twice the displacement and carry over 100 large missiles.
Behind them is the shipyard with its mass of construction halls and cranes. In the basin where the newest ships are docked after launch are another four destroyers. Again there are both Type-052D and Type-055 ships. Together with another Type-055 under construction on the left of the image, this brings the total number of large destroyers visible to 9. To put that into context, the Royal Navy’s entire destroyer fleet is just 6 ships. And this yard is just part of a much bigger construction program.
There are also some hovercraft which will be carried aboard the PLAN’s expanding fleet of amphibious warships. They will be used for transporting tanks and supplies from ship to shore. These are generally similar to the U.S. Navy’s Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC).
At the side of the basin, in a dry dock, is a massive Yuan Wang Class satellite and/or missile tracking ship. These are the sort of ships which look like an ocean liner but with a series of gigantic satellite dishes pointing skyward. When completed this could be used to support missile tests.
But the most impressive vessel is hidden in the background haze, barely discernible to the untrained eye. Beneath several massive gantry cranes in a purpose-built construction area is China’s next-generation aircraft carrier. China already has two carriers in service but this new carrier is expected to be significantly different. Known as the Type-003, it is believed to have electromagnetic catapults like the latest U.S. Navy Ford Class carrier. It is not expected to be launched for some time.
Other developments are not visible in the photo. It is the same shipyard where China’s mysterious sailless submarine has been constructed. Although that submarine is not clearly apparent in the photograph, it may be present in the basin.
This image paints an interesting picture of Chinese naval modernization. Yet the biggest takeaway is that this shipyard is not alone. There are many yards across China which are similarly impressive. The Chinese Navy of today, and the future, is changed beyond all recognition from the Chinese Navy of the past. The world naval balance is shifting.


russiainsider--2020-01-21--Belief in the 'Holocaust' Is Crumbling Around the World, What Will the Consequences of this Earthqua

Belief in the 'Holocaust' Is Crumbling Around the World, What Will the Consequences of this Earthquake Be?

‘ The lies will one day break down under their own weight and the truth will again triumph .
The hour will come when we shall stand pure and undefiled as our aims and beliefs have always been.
’ - Joseph Goebbels , April 1945 , in a letter to his eldest son .
The question that challenges the shrewdest philosophers and prophets is how the world will respond when the holocaust narrative is no longer considered believable .
What happens when the holocaust is regarded as far-fetched as Santa Claus , an illusion as is the fable of Emperor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Andersen .
Contemporary revelations of revisionists , historians and scholars have their equivalence with the heresies of Galileo ( 1564 – 1642 ) and heretics like Alexander Solzhenitsyn who dared to question what George Orwell described as ‘ the prevailing truth ’ .
In China , India , the Far East and Middle East , disbelief in the holocaust narrative is commonplace .
In Africa and Latin America , the holocaust is a non-story ; a sanctuary for those whom media dismiss as ‘ holocaust deniers ’ .
Even in the West , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down their protesting throats , the holocaust narrative is crumbling .
Today , there are few places where pollsters dare to ask questions relating to the official take on the holocaust .
However , we do know that 79 % of Poles consider the holocaust to be propaganda .
Hungarians are even more sceptical with only 17 percent believing in the holocaust storyline .
The litmus test is the United States where the American peoples have been brainwashed by holocaust propaganda more than any others .
Yet today , an impressive one-third of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ six million were murdered .
Such loss of credibility simply can not be recovered .
It was once confided in me that following the end of World War I ( 1914 – 1918 ) the British government formally acknowledged that slanders heaped upon troops of Imperial Germany were fictional and was merely propaganda to stir the masses into a war psychosis .
The outcome was an unprecedented outpouring of sympathy for the wronged and much-maligned Germans .
Imagine then the consequences if it is conceded that the holocaust narrative is unsustainable .
Worse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I , the holocaust myth has shamelessly and illegally been used to milk the Germans and other nations of billions of Euros .
No less than Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accept that historical revisionism ought to be recognised .
But both advised caution and control as the consequences of revisionism ( historical propaganda-free truths ) were beyond contemplation .
One can only speculate as to the reaction of millions who realise that not only have they been deceived by the holocaust lobby but actually aided the fraudsters by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for speculation as to how the now panicking holocaust lobbyists , the media , educationalists , judiciary , and the political elite will defend their previous positions .
The costs of the holocaust storyline being disproved are incalculable .
Every book or periodical that sustained the holocaust lie will soon have little use other than birdcage liner ; libraries , the contents of public library ’ s history sections will be worthless as will millions of movies and documentaries .
The outcome could be equal to the discovery that oil or the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it will be life-changing .
The holocaust lobby is at a loss as to how the holocaust storyline can be sustained .
Their last stronghold is to apply ‘ further education ’ along similar lines to the 1946 postwar ‘ Denazification Programs ’ which Germans were forced to attend before they could get jobs or homes .
My guess is that having accepted that the holocaust is considered no more credible than is Santa Claus or the Emperor ’ s new raiment , holocaust propaganda will be quietly shelved but the shekels will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money-laundering described as ‘ foreign aid ’ .
Then , the revisionist campaign will move to the attack to ensure that the international Jew ’ s cash cow is put out of its misery .
Imagine for a moment the treasure trove if the murdered victim for whom compensation is extorted is found to be alive and well .
In April 1945 , German Minister of Information Joseph Goebbels wrote to his stepson Harald .
‘ The lies will one day break down under their own weight and the truth will again triumph @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shall stand pure and undefiled as our aims and beliefs have always been .
’

‘The lies will one day break down under their own weight and the truth will again triumph. The hour will come when we shall stand pure and undefiled as our aims and beliefs have always been.’ - Joseph Goebbels, April 1945, in a letter to his eldest son.
The question that challenges the shrewdest philosophers and prophets is how the world will respond when the holocaust narrative is no longer considered believable. What happens when the holocaust is regarded as far-fetched as Santa Claus, an illusion as is the fable of Emperor’s New Clothes by Hans Christian Andersen.
Contemporary revelations of revisionists, historians and scholars have their equivalence with the heresies of Galileo (1564 – 1642) and heretics like Alexander Solzhenitsyn who dared to question what George Orwell described as ‘the prevailing truth’.
In China, India, the Far East and Middle East, disbelief in the holocaust narrative is commonplace. In Africa and Latin America, the holocaust is a non-story; a sanctuary for those whom media dismiss as ‘holocaust deniers’.
Even in the West, where plebeians have the holocaust constantly rammed down their protesting throats, the holocaust narrative is crumbling.
Today, there are few places where pollsters dare to ask questions relating to the official take on the holocaust. However, we do know that 79% of Poles consider the holocaust to be propaganda. Hungarians are even more sceptical with only 17 percent believing in the holocaust storyline.
The litmus test is the United States where the American peoples have been brainwashed by holocaust propaganda more than any others. Yet today, an impressive one-third of Americans think ‘substantially less’ than six million were murdered. Such loss of credibility simply cannot be recovered.
It was once confided in me that following the end of World War I (1914 – 1918) the British government formally acknowledged that slanders heaped upon troops of Imperial Germany were fictional and was merely propaganda to stir the masses into a war psychosis. The outcome was an unprecedented outpouring of sympathy for the wronged and much-maligned Germans.
Imagine then the consequences if it is conceded that the holocaust narrative is unsustainable. Worse, unlike the propaganda of World War I, the holocaust myth has shamelessly and illegally been used to milk the Germans and other nations of billions of Euros.
No less than Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accept that historical revisionism ought to be recognised. But both advised caution and control as the consequences of revisionism (historical propaganda-free truths) were beyond contemplation.
One can only speculate as to the reaction of millions who realise that not only have they been deceived by the holocaust lobby but actually aided the fraudsters by defending the holocaust narrative.
Another matter for speculation as to how the now panicking holocaust lobbyists, the media, educationalists, judiciary, and the political elite will defend their previous positions.
The costs of the holocaust storyline being disproved are incalculable. Every book or periodical that sustained the holocaust lie will soon have little use other than birdcage liner; libraries, the contents of public library’s history sections will be worthless as will millions of movies and documentaries. The outcome could be equal to the discovery that oil or the U.S. dollar no longer has a value; it will be life-changing.
The holocaust lobby is at a loss as to how the holocaust storyline can be sustained. Their last stronghold is to apply ‘further education’ along similar lines to the 1946 postwar ‘Denazification Programs’ which Germans were forced to attend before they could get jobs or homes.
My guess is that having accepted that the holocaust is considered no more credible than is Santa Claus or the Emperor’s new raiment, holocaust propaganda will be quietly shelved but the shekels will continue unabated perhaps under the auspices of money-laundering described as ‘foreign aid’.
Then, the revisionist campaign will move to the attack to ensure that the international Jew’s cash cow is put out of its misery. Imagine for a moment the treasure trove if the murdered victim for whom compensation is extorted is found to be alive and well.
In April 1945, German Minister of Information Joseph Goebbels wrote to his stepson Harald. ‘The lies will one day break down under their own weight and the truth will again triumph. The hour will come when we shall stand pure and undefiled as our aims and beliefs have always been.’


russiainsider--2020-01-21--The American Right Will Be Crushed in a Civil War, Unless It Organizes NOW

Civil war is in the air .
Many Americans have given up on politics .
The left keeps pushing to take away more of our freedoms .
They are chipping away at our culture , our traditions , our morals .
They have been doing it for a hundred years , and no one seems to be able to stop them .
It seems like the only way to change things is to have an all-out fight .
So , many conservative whites have been talking seriously about civil war .
That might not be very likely , but things @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state governments have passed laws clamping down on gun rights .
The most egregious of these are “ red flag ” laws , which allow police to seize a citizen ’ s guns if a neighbor or family member `` is worried about his mental health ” or some other flimsy reason .
In response , several VA counties have declared that they are “ second-amendment sanctuaries , ” meaning the local government will not enforce unconstitutional gun laws , even if state or federal authorities order them to .
But what if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservative whites win an all-out fight against the system ?
Many people think so .
They point out that right-wing whites have huge advantages .
They own more weapons , they have better weapons , and they know how to use them .
Liberals , on the other hand , live in cities with lots of hostile blacks and Hispanics .
They will run out of food and water quickly .
The state will not be able to maintain order .
On the other hand , some people argue that liberals and Jews @ @ @ @ @ @ @ long as there is a rump-government that controls most of the US military , it will be able to use superior weapons and fire-power to crush any resistance .
What chance does a rifle-militia have against an armored division ?
But both sides are missing the point .
Conservative whites will not lose a civil war because of tanks and fighters and missiles .
Nor will the government lose because it can not keep crowded cities fed and orderly .
The winner will be the side that is better organized , better led @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for .
And , by these criteria , CONSERVATIVE WHITES WILL LOSE .
First of all , “ civil war ” does not mean “ instant and immediate anarchy.
” It is not like a zombie movie .
The state and its foot-soldiers will not just disappear .
In any foreseeable scenario , a crippled , weakened government will stay in place , or it might crack up into different factions .
But the system will still control strong forces .
While the state has less control , that does not mean that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it stands now , conservative Americans do not have a common objective .
For the most part , they just want to be left alone .
Sure , they ’ ll fight , but only when they or their friends and families are threatened .
In contrast , the system has a very clear objective : it must annihilate its competition .
It will do whatever it takes .
You can bet the liberals and minorities will cling to the system , and submit to whatever it demands of them .
Most importantly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ count on its soldiers and police , as long as it can feed and pay them .
Most of them will do their job and think up the necessary moral justifications later—after they mow down scores of their fellow countrymen .
And as long as millions of rich Jews need the US government to protect them and their property , the government can count on money , food , and weapons from foreign sources .
The international Jewish system is not about to let its main hub—America—slip away .
This means that unless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whites will be crushed piecemeal .
The system will use whatever police and military forces it can muster to defeat them in detail .
It will find ways to take the rapacious energy of urban blacks and push it outward , toward suburban and rural whites .
It will slowly drive the “ resistance ” deeper and deeper into the backcountry until they can be cut off from their sources of supply and slaughtered one by one .
It will use the very methods it developed to fight Iraqi and Afghan insurgents , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As it is , conservative whites have not been able to find a common political goal and FIGHT FOR IT in times of peace , when it ’ s easy .
Since WWII , they have sat back and let their country be taken from them .
What makes them think they ’ ll do any better in times of war ?
As long as they do not have the guts to march in the streets for their rights and interests , they will not overcome the system , whether it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The problem is that conservative whites do not understand politics .
Liberals , blacks , Hispanics , Asians , and , above all , JEWS do .
They get that winning ( in war or in peace ) depends on teamwork , leadership , and clear , common objectives .
It also depends on the spirit and willingness to seize the initiative and ATTACK .
That means taking smart , calculated risks ; not sitting back and waiting for the perfect opportunity , which never comes .
So , what to do ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ floating around .
Maybe whites should give up , hit the bottle , and pray for a miracle .
Or maybe they should write more clever articles to spread “ awareness ” of race issues or the Jewish question .
Or maybe we should just work out , knock up a girl and grind away at a system-job for fifty years—that 'll show those Jews !
Or , better yet , we can all get into Republican politics , never say anything controversial , then , one day , we can turn the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ donors right from under their noses !
Look , white man , there is only one way to solve your country ’ s political problems .
You have to STAND UP AND FIGHT !
Americans need to realize that the system is the enemy , and that the only way to be free again will be to beat it .
To beat the system , they need to ORGANIZE , like the left has been doing for a hundred years .
If you are not willing to speak your mind in public now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ll have the guts to bang it out with swarms of riot police and federal agents when they come to take your guns ?
You have to sacrifice .
You will lose friends , relationships , money , status .
One day , you might end up in jail or be killed .
But you have to do it .
You have to do it now .
Civil war will not improve your chances .
As it is , speaking up is still technically legal .
The worst that is likely to happen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get beat up or be slammed with a flimsy lawsuit .
It is true that a few men have been railroaded in the courts and sent to prison even though they acted legally .
But that is only because almost NO ONE STOOD UP FOR THEM .
Where were the donors , where were the lawyers for James Fields , the RAM guys , etc etc ... ?
It ’ s not like there aren ’ t lawyers and rich men who sympathized with their plight .
It 's just that people did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thing .
The longer this goes on , the harsher the punishments will get .
For decades , whites have let things slide , and look where we are !
If we ’ d put up a fight years ago , we would not be facing such stark punishments now merely saying the truth .
It 's now or never .
“ Join or Die.
” Stop rationalizing cowardice .
You need to organize .
You need to say the truth , come what may .
The more men who speak up , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do so .
You need to prepare yourself mentally , spiritually , for whatever is coming .
Do it for your people .
For the memory of your ancestors , And for the future of your children .
Only the brave deserve to be free .

Civil war is in the air. Many Americans have given up on politics. The left keeps pushing to take away more of our freedoms. They are chipping away at our culture, our traditions, our morals. They have been doing it for a hundred years, and no one seems to be able to stop them. It seems like the only way to change things is to have an all-out fight.
So, many conservative whites have been talking seriously about civil war. That might not be very likely, but things have certainly been heating up. Some state governments have passed laws clamping down on gun rights. The most egregious of these are “red flag” laws, which allow police to seize a citizen’s guns if a neighbor or family member "is worried about his mental health” or some other flimsy reason.
In response, several VA counties have declared that they are “second-amendment sanctuaries,” meaning the local government will not enforce unconstitutional gun laws, even if state or federal authorities order them to.
But what if civil war does break out? Could conservative whites win an all-out fight against the system?
Many people think so. They point out that right-wing whites have huge advantages. They own more weapons, they have better weapons, and they know how to use them. Liberals, on the other hand, live in cities with lots of hostile blacks and Hispanics. They will run out of food and water quickly. The state will not be able to maintain order.
On the other hand, some people argue that liberals and Jews will have the upper hand. As long as there is a rump-government that controls most of the US military, it will be able to use superior weapons and fire-power to crush any resistance. What chance does a rifle-militia have against an armored division?
But both sides are missing the point. Conservative whites will not lose a civil war because of tanks and fighters and missiles. Nor will the government lose because it cannot keep crowded cities fed and orderly.
The winner will be the side that is better organized, better led, and knows what it is fighting for.
And, by these criteria, CONSERVATIVE WHITES WILL LOSE.
First of all, “civil war” does not mean “instant and immediate anarchy.” It is not like a zombie movie. The state and its foot-soldiers will not just disappear. In any foreseeable scenario, a crippled, weakened government will stay in place, or it might crack up into different factions. But the system will still control strong forces.
While the state has less control, that does not mean that there is a unified opposition. As it stands now, conservative Americans do not have a common objective. For the most part, they just want to be left alone. Sure, they’ll fight, but only when they or their friends and families are threatened.
In contrast, the system has a very clear objective: it must annihilate its competition. It will do whatever it takes. You can bet the liberals and minorities will cling to the system, and submit to whatever it demands of them.
Most importantly, the system will be able to count on its soldiers and police, as long as it can feed and pay them. Most of them will do their job and think up the necessary moral justifications later—after they mow down scores of their fellow countrymen.
And as long as millions of rich Jews need the US government to protect them and their property, the government can count on money, food, and weapons from foreign sources. The international Jewish system is not about to let its main hub—America—slip away.
This means that unless they organize and unite beforehand, right-wing whites will be crushed piecemeal. The system will use whatever police and military forces it can muster to defeat them in detail. It will find ways to take the rapacious energy of urban blacks and push it outward, toward suburban and rural whites. It will slowly drive the “resistance” deeper and deeper into the backcountry until they can be cut off from their sources of supply and slaughtered one by one. It will use the very methods it developed to fight Iraqi and Afghan insurgents, but this time against its own citizens.
As it is, conservative whites have not been able to find a common political goal and FIGHT FOR IT in times of peace, when it’s easy. Since WWII, they have sat back and let their country be taken from them. What makes them think they’ll do any better in times of war? As long as they do not have the guts to march in the streets for their rights and interests, they will not overcome the system, whether it’s a shooting fight or not.
The problem is that conservative whites do not understand politics. Liberals, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and, above all, JEWS do. They get that winning (in war or in peace) depends on teamwork, leadership, and clear, common objectives. It also depends on the spirit and willingness to seize the initiative and ATTACK. That means taking smart, calculated risks; not sitting back and waiting for the perfect opportunity, which never comes.
So, what to do? There are a lot of dumb ideas floating around. Maybe whites should give up, hit the bottle, and pray for a miracle. Or maybe they should write more clever articles to spread “awareness” of race issues or the Jewish question.
Or maybe we should just work out, knock up a girl and grind away at a system-job for fifty years—that'll show those Jews!
Or, better yet, we can all get into Republican politics, never say anything controversial, then, one day, we can turn the tables on the elites and steal their donors right from under their noses!
A super-sneaky revolution!!!
Look, white man, there is only one way to solve your country’s political problems. You have to STAND UP AND FIGHT! Americans need to realize that the system is the enemy, and that the only way to be free again will be to beat it. To beat the system, they need to ORGANIZE, like the left has been doing for a hundred years. If you are not willing to speak your mind in public now, what makes you think you’ll have the guts to bang it out with swarms of riot police and federal agents when they come to take your guns?
You have to sacrifice. You will lose friends, relationships, money, status. One day, you might end up in jail or be killed. But you have to do it. You have to do it now. Civil war will not improve your chances.
As it is, speaking up is still technically legal. The worst that is likely to happen is that you lose your job or get beat up or be slammed with a flimsy lawsuit.
It is true that a few men have been railroaded in the courts and sent to prison even though they acted legally. But that is only because almost NO ONE STOOD UP FOR THEM. Where were the donors, where were the lawyers for James Fields, the RAM guys, etc etc...? It’s not like there aren’t lawyers and rich men who sympathized with their plight. It's just that people did not work together to do the right thing.
The longer this goes on, the harsher the punishments will get. For decades, whites have let things slide, and look where we are! If we’d put up a fight years ago, we would not be facing such stark punishments now merely saying the truth.
It's now or never. “Join or Die.” Stop rationalizing cowardice. You need to organize. You need to say the truth, come what may. The more men who speak up, the more will find the courage to do so. You need to prepare yourself mentally, spiritually, for whatever is coming.
Do it for your people.
For the memory of your ancestors,
And for the future of your children.
Only the brave deserve to be free.


russiainsider--2020-01-21--1 in 5 German Elderly Live in Poverty - How Open Borders Impoverish Native Germans

According to the technocratic consensus , developed countries with high median ages and low birth rates need mass migration to pay for pensions .
What they do n't explain is how importing millions of people to gain employment as cleaners , Uber drivers and retail workers at reduced wages in big expensive cities is going to replenish the coffers with enough to cover the pensions of retired middle class Germans .
25 % of job-seeking `` refugees '' have never even attended school .
They consume less and are more likely to try and cheat the welfare system due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ families at home or pay back debts to smugglers .
The German economy is currently shrinking , so even the menial jobs immigrants are taking tend to be temp work .
Many of them live as badly or worse as in their home countries .
Natives too are feeling the burden of these disastrous liberal-capitalist policies .
A new , likely conservative estimate released last Thursday claims that more than 1 out of every 5 German pensioners live in poverty ( 19 % ) .
The numbers are projected to get worse in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the German government spent $ 26.6 billion dollars in 2018 to `` integrate '' millions of new migrants .
This is enough to give every one of Germany 's 22.9 million pensioners a substantial pay bump .
This is even more true if it were means-tested for middle and working class people .
Instead , the tragic irony of forced emigration has become increasingly normal for old people .
While some Germans choose to retire abroad out of their own free will , a growing number are moving to the Balkans or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ daily living expenses in their own land .
In response to this , Merkel 's conservative Christian Democratic Union begrudgingly agreed to a compromise with the Social-Democrats after the latter threatened to upend the country 's fragile ruling coalition .
A paltry $ 1.5 billion will be allocated to deal with this crisis .
The state does not pinch pennies when it comes to paying Jewish pensioners abroad , however .
German taxpayers are paying a record $ 560 million every year to so-called `` Holocaust survivors , '' which translates to about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the beneficiaries , who number at about 225,000 .
In 2018 , they bumped the usual yearly sum paid largely to Jews in Israel and America after accepting that Jews who spent the whole war in Algeria are `` survivors '' too .
The eligibility for this free money is pretty open ended : if you are Jewish and lived in any country the Axis powers ever had a presence in during World War II , you get paid .
The asset limit is $ 500,000 to apply .
Advocating for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under the constitution the Allies imposed .
While the first victims of this system tend to be the working class , the elderly and other politically invisible people , the comfortable middle classes who handed Merkel her narrow re-election in the name of `` stability '' should know that they will soon crumble into nothingness themselves .

According to the technocratic consensus, developed countries with high median ages and low birth rates need mass migration to pay for pensions.
What they don't explain is how importing millions of people to gain employment as cleaners, Uber drivers and retail workers at reduced wages in big expensive cities is going to replenish the coffers with enough to cover the pensions of retired middle class Germans. 25% of job-seeking "refugees" have never even attended school. They consume less and are more likely to try and cheat the welfare system due to pressure to send money back to their families at home or pay back debts to smugglers.
The German economy is currently shrinking, so even the menial jobs immigrants are taking tend to be temp work. Many of them live as badly or worse as in their home countries.
Natives too are feeling the burden of these disastrous liberal-capitalist policies. A new, likely conservative estimate released last Thursday claims that more than 1 out of every 5 German pensioners live in poverty (19%). The numbers are projected to get worse in the future.
At the same time, the German government spent $26.6 billion dollars in 2018 to "integrate" millions of new migrants. This is enough to give every one of Germany's 22.9 million pensioners a substantial pay bump. This is even more true if it were means-tested for middle and working class people.
Instead, the tragic irony of forced emigration has become increasingly normal for old people. While some Germans choose to retire abroad out of their own free will, a growing number are moving to the Balkans or Asia due to their inability to afford daily living expenses in their own land.
In response to this, Merkel's conservative Christian Democratic Union begrudgingly agreed to a compromise with the Social-Democrats after the latter threatened to upend the country's fragile ruling coalition. A paltry $1.5 billion will be allocated to deal with this crisis.
The state does not pinch pennies when it comes to paying Jewish pensioners abroad, however. German taxpayers are paying a record $560 million every year to so-called "Holocaust survivors," which translates to about an extra $300 dollars every month for the beneficiaries, who number at about 225,000. In 2018, they bumped the usual yearly sum paid largely to Jews in Israel and America after accepting that Jews who spent the whole war in Algeria are "survivors" too.
The eligibility for this free money is pretty open ended: if you are Jewish and lived in any country the Axis powers ever had a presence in during World War II, you get paid. The asset limit is $500,000 to apply.
Advocating for a Germany that puts Germans first is illegal under the constitution the Allies imposed. While the first victims of this system tend to be the working class, the elderly and other politically invisible people, the comfortable middle classes who handed Merkel her narrow re-election in the name of "stability" should know that they will soon crumble into nothingness themselves.