pamelagellerreport--2020-12-18--From Uncle Joe Stalin to Dementia Joe, the Dems’ Tradition of Treason Continues

Long before their embrace of Red China ( recall the prevalence of actual “ Maoists ” in the Obama White House ) , the Democrats vociferously defended Soviet communism for half a century , and even looked favorably on Fascism ( FDR was admitted admirer of Mussolini , and NAACP founder W.E .
DuBois praised Adolf Hitler ’ s policies ) .
The deep state Democrats have historically carried on a tradition of treason against the American people that spans decades .
But what is the reason ?
It can ’ t just be a geopolitical or globalist ideology .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ my friend , ” is one possible way to assess their behavior , but it doesn ’ t explain the suicidal nature of deep state Democrats and their willingness to give away the store completely .
For example , blackmail and being compromised perfectly explains why self-styled “ president-elect ” Joe Biden is “ not concerned ” his son was allegedly filmed committing pedophilic acts in China — while also signing onto everything the Chinese government wants America to do to its economy and its leadership position in the world without hesitancy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ right ?
Democrats have been betraying America to advance their own short-term political objectives and power grabs for such a long time that deciding which betrayals are deserving of mention is challenging .
Noteworthy is the fact that Joe Biden ’ s betrayals fit perfectly as a linear continuation of the list we originally published February 13 , 2017 .
Click here to read in its original form .
Biden ’ s treason is a testament to the fanatical dedication of deep state Democrats to getting power , keeping power and doing anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power — even if the cost is America ’ s ultimate enslavement .
“ With friends like these , who needs enemies ?
” goes an old adage .
The deep state Democrats epitomize this “ trite and true ” sentiment exactly with disturbing accuracy .
The tradition continues with the “ thief-in-chief.
” The latest information obtained by Tom Fitton ’ s Judicial Watch shows that Joe Biden flat-out asked the Chinese government for a payoff to do what they wanted on policy — let ’ s call it a quid pro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of corruption maybe ever seen in the annals of American political history .
“ New documents reported by Fox News Wednesday highlight the $ 10 million deal between Hunter Biden and the Chinese Communist Party.
” Biden reportedly offered his “ best wishes from the entire Biden family ” to CEFC Chairman Ye Jianming in 2017 and urged the Chinese business partner with deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party to wire over $ 10 million to “ properly fund and operate ” a “ joint Biden venture.
” That ’ s like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gene Wilder ’ s character discovers his late grandfather Victor Frankenstein ’ s book , “ How I Did It.
” Wilder ’ s character is observed subsequently in a feverish paper chase through the pages of his grandfather ’ s tome — until he exclaims , “ It could work !
” — quite simply , a situation that would never happen in real life .
Biden ’ s so obnoxiously and transparently engaging in treason just doesn ’ t seem real , unless it is understood as absurdist comedy or satire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ No one could be that bold , could they ?
” The Deep State Democrats can be and are that bold .
Joe killed satire , and Hunter made absurd comedy a daily headline .
But in doing so , they ’ ve arguably kept alive a Great Democratic Party tradition .
To paraphrase the late Sen. Ted Kennedy ’ s 1980 Democratic National Convention speech , “ The dream shall never die.
” These “ dreamers ” may dream Chinese dreams , however , not American ones .
No better illustration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ America ’ s senator ” — Ted Kennedy — contacted Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov and asked him to — literally , not figuratively – interfere behind the scenes in the U.S. presidential elections in 1984 to prevent Ronald Reagan from winning another term .
To “ hack ” our election .
Reagan won the Cold War , a fact which even Russian military brass acknowledge ( source , from Statecraft ) and which rankles many Democrats to this day .
If “ hacking ” a US election is truly deserving of liberal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get much worse than asking the head of the USSR — during the Cold War — to disenfranchise American voters .
Kennedy ’ s betrayal was severe and should have resulted in prison time .
But in Kennedy ’ s case , it was a resume enhancer .
Franklin Delano Roosevelt , praised Italian dictator Benito Mussolini as “ admirable , ” openly applauded fascism , referred to mass murderer Joseph Stalin as “ Uncle Joe , ” and had the highest concentration of Soviet spies in his administration except for successor Harry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Soviet spy problem by his own advisor , FDR reportedly remarked , “ Go f**k yourself.
” “ It ’ s the cleanest , neatest , most efficiently operating piece of social machinery I ’ ve ever seen .
It makes me envious , ” Roosevelt advisor Rexford Guy Tugwell said of fascism , adding that , “ I find Italy doing many of the things which seem to me necessary … Mussolini certainly has the same people opposed to him as FDR has.
” Mussolini returned the compliment , saying of Roosevelt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the mood accompanying this sea change [ New Deal ] resembles that of Fascism.
” After the war in Europe ended , Roosevelt gave away Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union , enslaving millions behind an Iron Curtain for half a century ( on advice from Soviet spy Alger Hiss ) .
President Harry Truman , the only president to ever use a nuclear weapon — twice — was repeatedly warned by the FBI about specific Soviet spies in his administration who he then promoted to positions of critical influence in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White , for example , was appointed to head up the International Monetary Fund after he was identified through intercepted Soviet cables as a Soviet spy .
Truman was told numerous times of White ’ s identity .
Truman approved White ’ s appointment anyway .
The U.S. delegation to the United Nations founding conference was composed of almost all Soviet spies , and chaired by one — Alger Hiss .
Truman looked the other way .
Truman graduated from appointing confirmed Soviet spies to top government posts to illegally sharing American troop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during the Korean War .
General Lin Piao , commander of the Chinese forces , would later comment : “ I never would have made the attack and risked my men and my military reputation if I had not been assured that Washington would restrain General MacArthur… .
” While betraying our troops in Korea , Truman also told American ally Taiwan that it needed to submit to a Communist China or lose U.S. support .
LBJ approved the sale of “ dual-use ” technologies to the Russians after a visit with David @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the Soviets , were used to duplicate American weapons of war — resulting in higher numbers of American dead in Vietnam .
The Soviet Union accounted for 80 percent of Hanoi ’ s war supplies — making ANY trade with Russia truly outrageous .
LBJ enabled the Soviet experiment to survive well into the 20th Century .
In short , Russia was the best enemy money could buy .
In addition to practically giving Russia American weapons , LBJ also forced U.S. troops to fight one-handed .
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” — which radically altered the way U.S. soldiers fought wars — were implemented under LBJ .
The new “ rules ” included a ridiculous requirement that American soldiers “ not fire unless fired upon.
” Also , a North Vietnamese MIG could not be struck if spotted on a runway ; only if airborne and showing hostile intent and enemy surface-to-air missile sites could not be bombed while under construction ; only after they became operational .
America was asked to fight a war this way .
In other words , Johnson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have first strike advantage at all times — meaning we were always on the defensive , and always guaranteed to lose .
After taking office , President Jimmy Carter embarked on a mission to let Communism prevail whenever and wherever , abandoning key allies while actively funding Soviet proxies — making Carter either dangerously incompetent or deserving of prison time : Carter gave away the Panama Canal , which is now partially controlled by the Chinese military and can be shut down during potential future conflicts where American mobility will be essential ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and unilaterally terminated our defense treaty with Taiwan .
Carter ’ s State Department gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Communist guerrilla fighters in South America .
Carter made America dependent on Muslim oil for the last half century , by prohibiting exports and setting price caps that made foreign oil cheaper than drilling and refining in the U.S. Carter allowed long-time ally Iran to fall to radical Islam , doing nothing in the face of a violent coup , which ultimately resulted in American hostages ( who he also failed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ retired from public “ service , ” Carter still finds ways to sell out America and its allies , like when he leaked that Israel has a nuclear arsenal of 300 warheads ( top secret . )
President Bill Clinton ’ s actions in support of American enemies ( motives or intent irrelevant ) are too numerous to list in entirety , but the greatest hits include : Giving China top secret U.S. missile guidance technology in exchange for illegal campaign donations , enabling Chinese missiles to hit U.S. cities .
China threatened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Giving Russia $ 1.25 billion in “ disarmament aid , ” even though the Russians refused audits .
Giving ( trying to give ) the China Ocean Shipping Company ( Cosco ) , a 600-ship global shipping company controlled by the People ’ s Liberation Army , a 20-year lease on the U.S .
Naval Shipyard in Long Beach , Calif .
Giving away the Panama Canal and giving Cosco the ports of Colon and Cristobal at both ends of the Panama Canal — virtually consigning U.S. naval control of global seaways to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Osama Bin Laden go free , after he had already declared war on the U.S. and announced plans to attack major American cities .
Clinton advisor Sandy Berger committed a felony in order to steal documents revealing Clinton ’ s role in 9/11 .
Democrats indisputably and consistently provide support for America ’ s enemies and do so flagrantly without fear of criminal penalties or consequences of any kind .
Russia is at least open and historically candid about its view of America as a strategic enemy and its actions often reflect these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brazenly giving away the store and burning down our own house is a threat even more deadly to America ’ s survival .
“ If destruction be our lot , we ourselves must be its author and finisher.
” The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Long before their embrace of Red China (recall the prevalence of actual “Maoists” in the Obama White House), the Democrats vociferously defended Soviet communism for half a century, and even looked favorably on Fascism (FDR was admitted admirer of Mussolini, and NAACP founder W.E. DuBois praised Adolf Hitler’s policies).
The deep state Democrats have historically carried on a tradition of treason against the American people that spans decades.
But what is the reason? It can’t just be a geopolitical or globalist ideology. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend,” is one possible way to assess their behavior, but it doesn’t explain the suicidal nature of deep state Democrats and their willingness to give away the store completely.
But blackmail does.
For example, blackmail and being compromised perfectly explains why self-styled “president-elect” Joe Biden is “not concerned” his son was allegedly filmed committing pedophilic acts in China — while also signing onto everything the Chinese government wants America to do to its economy and its leadership position in the world without hesitancy. “Nothing to see here,” right?
Democrats have been betraying America to advance their own short-term political objectives and power grabs for such a long time that deciding which betrayals are deserving of mention is challenging.
Noteworthy is the fact that Joe Biden’s betrayals fit perfectly as a linear continuation of the list we originally published February 13, 2017.
Click here to read in its original form.
Biden’s treason is a testament to the fanatical dedication of deep state Democrats to getting power, keeping power and doing anything, as long as it results in power — even if the cost is America’s ultimate enslavement.
“With friends like these, who needs enemies?” goes an old adage.
The deep state Democrats epitomize this “trite and true” sentiment exactly with disturbing accuracy. The tradition continues with the “thief-in-chief.”
The latest information obtained by Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch shows that Joe Biden flat-out asked the Chinese government for a payoff to do what they wanted on policy — let’s call it a quid pro quo — possibly the most cartoonish display of corruption maybe ever seen in the annals of American political history.
“New documents reported by Fox News Wednesday highlight the $10 million deal between Hunter Biden and the Chinese Communist Party.”
Biden reportedly offered his “best wishes from the entire Biden family” to CEFC Chairman Ye Jianming in 2017 and urged the Chinese business partner with deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party to wire over $10 million to “properly fund and operate” a “joint Biden venture.”
That’s like the scene in Young Frankenstein, where Gene Wilder’s character discovers his late grandfather Victor Frankenstein’s book, “How I Did It.” Wilder’s character is observed subsequently in a feverish paper chase through the pages of his grandfather’s tome — until he exclaims, “It could work!” — quite simply, a situation that would never happen in real life.
Biden’s so obnoxiously and transparently engaging in treason just doesn’t seem real, unless it is understood as absurdist comedy or satire. Surely, people tell themselves, “No one could be that bold, could they?”
The Deep State Democrats can be and are that bold.
Joe killed satire, and Hunter made absurd comedy a daily headline. But in doing so, they’ve arguably kept alive a Great Democratic Party tradition. To paraphrase the late Sen. Ted Kennedy’s 1980 Democratic National Convention speech, “The dream shall never die.”
These “dreamers” may dream Chinese dreams, however, not American ones.
TED KENNEDY: “AMERICA’S SENATOR”
No better illustration of this dynamic exists than when “America’s senator” — Ted Kennedy — contacted Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov and asked him to — literally, not figuratively – interfere behind the scenes in the U.S. presidential elections in 1984 to prevent Ronald Reagan from winning another term. To “hack” our election. Reagan won the Cold War, a fact which even Russian military brass acknowledge (source, from Statecraft) and which rankles many Democrats to this day.
If “hacking” a US election is truly deserving of liberal scorn, then it doesn’t get much worse than asking the head of the USSR — during the Cold War — to disenfranchise American voters.
Kennedy’s betrayal was severe and should have resulted in prison time. But in Kennedy’s case, it was a resume enhancer.
FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT: FASCISM IS COOL
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, praised Italian dictator Benito Mussolini as “admirable,” openly applauded fascism, referred to mass murderer Joseph Stalin as “Uncle Joe,” and had the highest concentration of Soviet spies in his administration except for successor Harry Truman. When confronted on the pervasive Soviet spy problem by his own advisor, FDR reportedly remarked, “Go f**k yourself.”
“It’s the cleanest, neatest, most efficiently operating piece of social machinery I’ve ever seen. It makes me envious,” Roosevelt advisor Rexford Guy Tugwell said of fascism, adding that, “I find Italy doing many of the things which seem to me necessary … Mussolini certainly has the same people opposed to him as FDR has.”
Mussolini returned the compliment, saying of Roosevelt’s America, “Without question, the mood accompanying this sea change [New Deal] resembles that of Fascism.”
After the war in Europe ended, Roosevelt gave away Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union, enslaving millions behind an Iron Curtain for half a century (on advice from Soviet spy Alger Hiss).
HARRY TRUMAN, FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE
President Harry Truman, the only president to ever use a nuclear weapon — twice — was repeatedly warned by the FBI about specific Soviet spies in his administration who he then promoted to positions of critical influence in the U.S. government.
Treasury official Harry Dexter White, for example, was appointed to head up the International Monetary Fund after he was identified through intercepted Soviet cables as a Soviet spy. Truman was told numerous times of White’s identity. Truman approved White’s appointment anyway. The U.S. delegation to the United Nations founding conference was composed of almost all Soviet spies, and chaired by one — Alger Hiss. Truman looked the other way.
Truman graduated from appointing confirmed Soviet spies to top government posts to illegally sharing American troop movements with the Soviets and the Chinese during the Korean War. General Lin Piao, commander of the Chinese forces, would later comment: “I never would have made the attack and risked my men and my military reputation if I had not been assured that Washington would restrain General MacArthur… .”
While betraying our troops in Korea, Truman also told American ally Taiwan that it needed to submit to a Communist China or lose U.S. support.
LYNDON BANES JOHNSON, “ARMING THE ENEMY”
LBJ approved the sale of “dual-use” technologies to the Russians after a visit with David Rockefeller.
Such technologies, once obtained by the Soviets, were used to duplicate American weapons of war — resulting in higher numbers of American dead in Vietnam. The Soviet Union accounted for 80 percent of Hanoi’s war supplies — making ANY trade with Russia truly outrageous.
LBJ enabled the Soviet experiment to survive well into the 20th Century. In short, Russia was the best enemy money could buy.
In addition to practically giving Russia American weapons, LBJ also forced U.S. troops to fight one-handed. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara’s notorious “rules of engagement” — which radically altered the way U.S. soldiers fought wars — were implemented under LBJ.
The new “rules” included a ridiculous requirement that American soldiers “not fire unless fired upon.” Also, a North Vietnamese MIG could not be struck if spotted on a runway; only if airborne and showing hostile intent and enemy surface-to-air missile sites could not be bombed while under construction; only after they became operational.
America was asked to fight a war this way.
In other words, Johnson ordered our troops to let the enemy have first strike advantage at all times — meaning we were always on the defensive, and always guaranteed to lose.
JIMMY CARTER, MR. PEANUT
After taking office, President Jimmy Carter embarked on a mission to let Communism prevail whenever and wherever, abandoning key allies while actively funding Soviet proxies — making Carter either dangerously incompetent or deserving of prison time:
Carter gave away the Panama Canal, which is now partially controlled by the Chinese military and can be shut down during potential future conflicts where American mobility will be essential (and, unavailable.)
Carter illegally and unilaterally terminated our defense treaty with Taiwan.
Carter’s State Department gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Communist guerrilla fighters in South America.
Carter made America dependent on Muslim oil for the last half century, by prohibiting exports and setting price caps that made foreign oil cheaper than drilling and refining in the U.S.
Carter allowed long-time ally Iran to fall to radical Islam, doing nothing in the face of a violent coup, which ultimately resulted in American hostages (who he also failed to protect.)
Traitor-Emeritus: Even though retired from public “service,” Carter still finds ways to sell out America and its allies, like when he leaked that Israel has a nuclear arsenal of 300 warheads (top secret.)
BILL CLINTON – WHERE TO BEGIN?
President Bill Clinton’s actions in support of American enemies (motives or intent irrelevant) are too numerous to list in entirety, but the greatest hits include:
Giving China top secret U.S. missile guidance technology in exchange for illegal campaign donations, enabling Chinese missiles to hit U.S. cities. China threatened to nuke Los Angeles in 1997.
Giving Russia $1.25 billion in “disarmament aid,” even though the Russians refused audits.
Giving (trying to give) the China Ocean Shipping Company (Cosco), a 600-ship global shipping company controlled by the People’s Liberation Army, a 20-year lease on the U.S. Naval Shipyard in Long Beach, Calif.
Giving away the Panama Canal and giving Cosco the ports of Colon and Cristobal at both ends of the Panama Canal — virtually consigning U.S. naval control of global seaways to the PLA.
THE BIGGIE: Letting Osama Bin Laden go free, after he had already declared war on the U.S. and announced plans to attack major American cities. Clinton advisor Sandy Berger committed a felony in order to steal documents revealing Clinton’s role in 9/11.
Democrats indisputably and consistently provide support for America’s enemies and do so flagrantly without fear of criminal penalties or consequences of any kind.
Russia is at least open and historically candid about its view of America as a strategic enemy and its actions often reflect these historical norms. But our own countrymen brazenly giving away the store and burning down our own house is a threat even more deadly to America’s survival.
“If destruction be our lot, we ourselves must be its author and finisher.”
~Abraham Lincoln, address at Lyceum
Google+
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-18--18 House Members, House and Senate Committee Chairs Join Rep Brooks Request Election Fraud Hearings

18 House Members, House and Senate Committee Chairs Join Rep Brooks Request Election Fraud Hearings Before January 6th Electoral College Vote

In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi , eighteen House colleagues and various House and Senate committee chairs join Rep. Mo Brooks in seeking election fraud hearings ahead of the Jan 6th Electoral College vote submissions .
This is happening .
The whole political landscape is about to change .
Yesterday ’ s men will be all but forgotten while the brave and principled will go down in the history books for saving the Republic .
Fortunes are changing as we speak .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi, eighteen House colleagues and various House and Senate committee chairs join Rep. Mo Brooks in seeking election fraud hearings ahead of the Jan 6th Electoral College vote submissions.
This is happening. The whole political landscape is about to change. Yesterday’s men will be all but forgotten while the brave and principled will go down in the history books for saving the Republic. Fortunes are changing as we speak.
https://twitter.com/RepMoBrooks/status/1339623798866407425?s=20
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-19--China Engaged in ‘Mass Surveillance’ on Americans’ Mobile Phones, Report Finds

On a side note , a group founded by far-left tech giants Google and IBM is working with a company that is helping China ’ s authoritarian government conduct mass surveillance against its citizens , The Intercept can reveal .
The Chinese regime exploited vulnerabilities in the global mobile telecommunications network to conduct “ mass surveillance ” on Americans , according to a recent report by a cyber research firm .
By Cathy He , The Epoch Times , December 17 , 2020 : By analyzing signals data , the report by Washington-based Exigent Media found that Beijing , working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the leading source of attacks against U.S. mobile users over 3G and 4G networks in 2018 .
The regime exploited well-known network vulnerabilities , which allowed it to track , monitor , disrupt , and intercept communications of U.S. phone subscribers while they traveled abroad .
The vulnerabilities are centered around the legacy mobile SS7 signaling system , described in the report as “ a patchwork system enabling network operators around the world to communicate with each other for international roaming services.
” The Chinese cyberattacks targeted tens of thousands of U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gary Miller , the report ’ s author and a former mobile network security executive , told The Guardian .
“ Once you get into the tens of thousands , the attacks qualify as mass surveillance , which is primarily for intelligence collection and not necessarily targeting high-profile targets , ” Miller said .
“ It might be that there are locations of interest , and these occur primarily while people are abroad.
” That the attacks were routed through a state-controlled operator indicates a state-sanctioned espionage campaign , Miller told the outlet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2018 , two Caribbean operators were also involved in a series of attacks on U.S. phone users targeted by China Unicom , suggesting coordination between these networks .
The two operators were Cable & Wireless Communications ( Flow ) in Barbados and the Bahamas Telecommunications Company ( BTC ) .
The report found that from 2019 , attacks from China decreased , while those originating from the Caribbean networks shot up—suggesting that Beijing was attempting to mask its activities through foreign operators .
“ China reduced its attack volumes , favoring more targeted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Caribbean and Africa to conduct its attacks , having close ties in both trade and technology investment , ” the report stated .
Citing Beijing ’ s expanded investment in the Caribbean , such as Chinese telecom giant Huawei ’ s partnership with BTC on the Bahamas ’ 4G rollout , the report questioned whether this indicated a “ strategic signals intelligence alliance between China and the Caribbean.
” The report added it was likely that Caribbean operators have sold or leased network addresses to Chinese entities , allowing them to conduct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knowledge .
Cable & Wireless , the company that owns Flow and BTC , said in an emailed statement to The Epoch Times that it was “ carefully reviewing the information in the media reports.
” The company added that it continuously monitors its networks across all its markets including Barbados and Bahamas and has “ robust security policies and protocols in place to protect the data of our customers.
” China Unicom in a statement to The Epoch Times said it “ strongly refutes the allegations that China Unicom has engaged in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subscribers using access to international telecommunications networks.
” In April , the U.S. Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) warned that the U.S. operations of China Unicom and two other state-controlled telecoms could be shut down , citing national security risks .
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said federal agencies were “ deeply concerned ” about the companies ’ vulnerability to the “ exploitation , influence , and control of the Chinese Communist Party.
” Report author Miller found that attacks on U.S. mobile users continued in 2020 , originating from Chinese and Hong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries .
“ Unfortunately , these attacks will continue globally between mobile operators until full accountability , reporting of the attacks , penalties , and control of external ‘ partners and customers ’ who are provided with access to networks are exercised , ” Miller told The Epoch Times in an email .

On a side note, a group founded by far-left tech giants Google and IBM is working with a company that is helping China’s authoritarian government conduct mass surveillance against its citizens, The Intercept can reveal.
China Engaged in ‘Mass Surveillance’ on Americans’ Mobile Phones, Report Finds
The Chinese regime exploited vulnerabilities in the global mobile telecommunications network to conduct “mass surveillance” on Americans, according to a recent report by a cyber research firm.
By Cathy He, The Epoch Times, December 17, 2020:
By analyzing signals data, the report by Washington-based Exigent Media found that Beijing, working through state-owned telecom operator China Unicom, was the leading source of attacks against U.S. mobile users over 3G and 4G networks in 2018.
The regime exploited well-known network vulnerabilities, which allowed it to track, monitor, disrupt, and intercept communications of U.S. phone subscribers while they traveled abroad. The vulnerabilities are centered around the legacy mobile SS7 signaling system, described in the report as “a patchwork system enabling network operators around the world to communicate with each other for international roaming services.”
The Chinese cyberattacks targeted tens of thousands of U.S. mobile users from 2018 to 2020, Gary Miller, the report’s author and a former mobile network security executive, told The Guardian.
“Once you get into the tens of thousands, the attacks qualify as mass surveillance, which is primarily for intelligence collection and not necessarily targeting high-profile targets,” Miller said. “It might be that there are locations of interest, and these occur primarily while people are abroad.”
That the attacks were routed through a state-controlled operator indicates a state-sanctioned espionage campaign, Miller told the outlet.
The analyst also found that in 2018, two Caribbean operators were also involved in a series of attacks on U.S. phone users targeted by China Unicom, suggesting coordination between these networks. The two operators were Cable & Wireless Communications (Flow) in Barbados and the Bahamas Telecommunications Company (BTC).
The report found that from 2019, attacks from China decreased, while those originating from the Caribbean networks shot up—suggesting that Beijing was attempting to mask its activities through foreign operators.
“China reduced its attack volumes, favoring more targeted espionage, likely using proxy networks in the Caribbean and Africa to conduct its attacks, having close ties in both trade and technology investment,” the report stated.
[the_ad id=”110283″]
Citing Beijing’s expanded investment in the Caribbean, such as Chinese telecom giant Huawei’s partnership with BTC on the Bahamas’ 4G rollout, the report questioned whether this indicated a “strategic signals intelligence alliance between China and the Caribbean.”
The report added it was likely that Caribbean operators have sold or leased network addresses to Chinese entities, allowing them to conduct espionage, potentially without the operators’ knowledge.
Cable & Wireless, the company that owns Flow and BTC, said in an emailed statement to The Epoch Times that it was “carefully reviewing the information in the media reports.”
The company added that it continuously monitors its networks across all its markets including Barbados and Bahamas and has “robust security policies and protocols in place to protect the data of our customers.”
China Unicom in a statement to The Epoch Times said it “strongly refutes the allegations that China Unicom has engaged in active surveillance attacks against U.S. mobile phone subscribers using access to international telecommunications networks.”
In April, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) warned that the U.S. operations of China Unicom and two other state-controlled telecoms could be shut down, citing national security risks.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said federal agencies were “deeply concerned” about the companies’ vulnerability to the “exploitation, influence, and control of the Chinese Communist Party.”
Report author Miller found that attacks on U.S. mobile users continued in 2020, originating from Chinese and Hong Kong sources, as well as other countries.
“Unfortunately, these attacks will continue globally between mobile operators until full accountability, reporting of the attacks, penalties, and control of external ‘partners and customers’ who are provided with access to networks are exercised,” Miller told The Epoch Times in an email.
“This needs to happen immediately.”


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-19--All The People Who Should Be Embarrassed About The Latest Hunter Biden News, Ranked

Two months after the New York Post published its series of exposés on Hunter Biden , new information has revealed a lot of people with a lot to be embarrassed about .
A lot of powerful people have a lot to be embarrassed about .
Last week , President-elect Joe Biden ’ s transition team released a statement acknowledging the existence of an investigation under the Delaware U.S. attorney ’ s office probing Hunter Biden ’ s tax affairs .
The investigation joins a broader probe examining Hunter ’ s finances underway by the securities fraud unit in the Southern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Politico , and another targeting James Biden , Joe Biden ’ s brother , in Pennsylvania related to a series of hospital deals .
The existence of ongoing federal investigations targeting Hunter Biden was first reported in October , days before the November election .
Content surfaced on an abandoned Delaware laptop implicating Joe Biden in his son ’ s potentially criminal overseas business dealings .
Democrats dismissed the revelations as pure Russian disinformation , offering their allies in the corporate media an excuse to ignore the news they ’ re responsible for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden family corruption altogether .
The irony of the Hunter Biden saga is rich , considering the same media perpetuated a four-year conspiracy with no end indicting President Donald Trump in the press as a Kremlin agent , laying the roots for a baseless narrative to attack any reporting they simply don ’ t like , including the blockbuster revelations on Hunter Biden .
Now that Hunter Biden has acknowledged an ongoing investigation probing his finances from the Department of Justice , legacy outlets finally offering coverage after forgoing any attention to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the election .
But don ’ t hold your breath for coverage to be fair .
If it wasn ’ t clear before — and it was given statements from the FBI , the Department of Justice , the director of national intelligence , and the Department of State — it ’ s undeniably clear now that stories unearthing incriminating details on Hunter Biden did not stem from some Russian plot to interfere in the November election .
Public knowledge of not one , but three federal investigations targeting the Biden family with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drive authenticated with forensic analysis also obtained by federal authorities help make that clear .
Yet two months after legacy media declined to take the Hunter Biden story seriously for potentially undermining their preferred presidential candidate , there ’ s a lot of people who engaged in interference with no shame and no accountability .
The stories that surfaced in October ought to embarrass a lot of people .
Here ’ s a short list .
Above all , former Vice President Biden remains at the heart of the controversy , caught in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ son ’ s overseas business ventures that emails show sought to enrich the entire family , including the president-elect himself .
The first bombshell to drop in the New York Post ’ s series of October exposés caught Joe Biden lying throughout the entire campaign when repeatedly denying ever discussing business with his son , “ or with anyone else.
” Indeed , 2015 emails show Joe Biden personally met with a senior advisor for Burisma , the Ukrainian energy firm showering the vice president ’ s son with upwards of $ 50,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden served as the “ public face ” of Obama administration policy on Ukraine .
Biden , however , even fat-shamed an Iowa voter for bringing the Ukraine scandal up .
New emails published by Fox News Wednesday offer greater insight into a $ 10 million deal , likely the same as that reported by the New York Post in its story on Hunter Biden ’ s laptop .
Documents , Fox News reported , revealed Hunter Biden offering Chinese business partners with deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party his “ best @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while requesting $ 10 million .
Emails published by the New York Post dated a month later show the same Chinese business partners offering Hunter Biden a $ 10 million a year contract for “ introductions alone , ” explicitly setting aside a sizable portion for Joe Biden funneled through Hunter .
During the presidential debate in October , however , Biden accused Trump of peddling Russian disinformation for pointing out this story .
The Hunter Biden saga is just as much a scandal for big tech as it is big media .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ story went live , Twitter began blocking its URL on the platform and disabled the paper ’ s account .
Twitter later explained it had blocked sharing because the article included “ hacked ” content , a frivolous explanation capitalizing on rules clearly selectively enforced to suppress the biggest story of the 2020 election .
Despite an apology from Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey , Twitter ’ s censorship continued , blocking the URL of the Post ’ s second story documenting Hunter Biden ’ s $ 10 million deal with Chinese business partners @

Two months after the New York Post published its series of exposés on Hunter Biden, new information has revealed a lot of people with a lot to be embarrassed about.
By Tristan Justice, The Federalist, December 18, 2020lass=”entry-content long clearfix”>
A lot of powerful people have a lot to be embarrassed about.
Last week, President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team released a statement acknowledging the existence of an investigation under the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office probing Hunter Biden’s tax affairs. The investigation joins a broader probe examining Hunter’s finances underway by the securities fraud unit in the Southern District of New York, reported by Politico, and another targeting James Biden, Joe Biden’s brother, in Pennsylvania related to a series of hospital deals.
The existence of ongoing federal investigations targeting Hunter Biden was first reported in October, days before the November election. Content surfaced on an abandoned Delaware laptop implicating Joe Biden in his son’s potentially criminal overseas business dealings.
Democrats dismissed the revelations as pure Russian disinformation, offering their allies in the corporate media an excuse to ignore the news they’re responsible for reporting when not delegitimizing the idea of Biden family corruption altogether.
The irony of the Hunter Biden saga is rich, considering the same media perpetuated a four-year conspiracy with no end indicting President Donald Trump in the press as a Kremlin agent, laying the roots for a baseless narrative to attack any reporting they simply don’t like, including the blockbuster revelations on Hunter Biden.
Now that Hunter Biden has acknowledged an ongoing investigation probing his finances from the Department of Justice, legacy outlets finally offering coverage after forgoing any attention to a story that became even more important following the election. But don’t hold your breath for coverage to be fair.
If it wasn’t clear before — and it was given statements from the FBI, the Department of Justice, the director of national intelligence, and the Department of State — it’s undeniably clear now that stories unearthing incriminating details on Hunter Biden did not stem from some Russian plot to interfere in the November election. Public knowledge of not one, but three federal investigations targeting the Biden family with an on-the-record whistleblower and a laptop hard drive authenticated with forensic analysis also obtained by federal authorities help make that clear.
Yet two months after legacy media declined to take the Hunter Biden story seriously for potentially undermining their preferred presidential candidate, there’s a lot of people who engaged in interference with no shame and no accountability. The stories that surfaced in October ought to embarrass a lot of people. Here’s a short list.
Joe Biden
Above all, former Vice President Biden remains at the heart of the controversy, caught in a web of lies covering for his son’s overseas business ventures that emails show sought to enrich the entire family, including the president-elect himself.
The first bombshell to drop in the New York Post’s series of October exposés caught Joe Biden lying throughout the entire campaign when repeatedly denying ever discussing business with his son, “or with anyone else.” Indeed, 2015 emails show Joe Biden personally met with a senior advisor for Burisma, the Ukrainian energy firm showering the vice president’s son with upwards of $50,000 a month in excess compensation while Joe Biden served as the “public face” of Obama administration policy on Ukraine.
Biden, however, even fat-shamed an Iowa voter for bringing the Ukraine scandal up.
New emails published by Fox News Wednesday offer greater insight into a $10 million deal, likely the same as that reported by the New York Post in its story on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Documents, Fox News reported, revealed Hunter Biden offering Chinese business partners with deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party his “best wishes from the entire Biden family” while requesting $10 million.
Emails published by the New York Post dated a month later show the same Chinese business partners offering Hunter Biden a $10 million a year contract for “introductions alone,” explicitly setting aside a sizable portion for Joe Biden funneled through Hunter.
During the presidential debate in October, however, Biden accused Trump of peddling Russian disinformation for pointing out this story.
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey
The Hunter Biden saga is just as much a scandal for big tech as it is big media. Moments after the first New York Post story went live, Twitter began blocking its URL on the platform and disabled the paper’s account.
Twitter later explained it had blocked sharing because the article included “hacked” content, a frivolous explanation capitalizing on rules clearly selectively enforced to suppress the biggest story of the 2020 election.
Despite an apology from Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s censorship continued, blocking the URL of the Post’s second story documenting Hunter Biden’s $10 million deal with Chinese business partners.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-19--Californians FLEE State in SUCH HUGE NUMBERS, It’s Projected to Lose House Seat and Electoral Vote f

Californians FLEE State in SUCH HUGE NUMBERS, It’s Projected to Lose House Seat and Electoral Vote for First Time

But do not bring your primitive , poisonous politics .
Don ’ t befoul red states and destroy them as well .
Californians flee state in numbers so great it is projected to lose House seat and electoral vote for first time An exodus sparked by high taxes , coronavirus lockdowns , and regulations has driven California ’ s population growth rate to a record low , which is projected to cost the state a seat in Congress and an electoral vote .
“ This is a real sea change in California , which used to be this state of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hans Johnson , a demographer at the Public Policy Institute of California , regarding the net migration loss , which has now occurred three years in a row .
“ It hasn ’ t been for some time now .
But it ’ s now gotten to the point where the state is essentially not growing population-wise at all.
” According to a , 135,600 more people fled the Golden State than moved there , which marks only the 12th time since 1900 that the state saw a net migration loss .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ added that the population decrease could cause the state to lose a seat in Congress as well as an Electoral College vote for the first time .
The state did not gain any seats following the 2010 census , which was also a first .
Residents have cited high taxes as a main driver of the decision to leave . ]
“ I never wanted to leave California , ” San Francisco real estate broker Scott Fuller said about his departure from the state after living there since 1983 .
“ It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ best climate .
I think the tipping point was continued tax increases and even more proposed tax increases .
… I have absolutely no regrets.
” Businesses have been , and just recently , it was learned that tech giants Elon Musk and Larry Ellison were moving their companies , Tesla and Oracle , to more business-friendly states and taking tens of thousands of jobs with them .
Californians have also expressed increased frustration with state and local governments over strict coronavirus lockdowns , evidenced by and a that has gained enough steam @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus pandemic has also forced many in California to work from home , which makes living close to work less important and a potential move easier to commit to , especially when the same salary can be earned in a less expensive state .
“ It ’ s really sped up the out-migration quite a bit , ” Fuller said about the shift to remote employment .
“ People have options now , and you pair that with people ’ s frustration on several different levels — I don ’ t see it @ @

But do not bring your primitive, poisonous politics. Don’t befoul red states and destroy them as well.
Californians flee state in numbers so great it is projected to lose House seat and electoral vote for first time
By Andrew Mark Miller, Washington Examiner, December 18, 2020:
An exodus sparked by high taxes, coronavirus lockdowns, and regulations has driven California’s population growth rate to a record low, which is projected to cost the state a seat in Congress and an electoral vote.
“This is a real sea change in California, which used to be this state of pretty robust population growth,” said Hans Johnson, a demographer at the Public Policy Institute of California, regarding the net migration loss, which has now occurred three years in a row. “It hasn’t been for some time now. But it’s now gotten to the point where the state is essentially not growing population-wise at all.”
According to a population estimate this week , 135,600 more people fled the Golden State than moved there, which marks only the 12th time since 1900 that the state saw a net migration loss. It is the third-largest drop recorded.
Johnson added that the population decrease could cause the state to lose a seat in Congress as well as an Electoral College vote for the first time. The state did not gain any seats following the 2010 census, which was also a first.
Residents have cited high taxes as a main driver of the decision to leave.][the_ad id=”110283″]
“I never wanted to leave California,” San Francisco real estate broker Scott Fuller said about his departure from the state after living there since 1983. “It’s the most beautiful state with the best climate. I think the tipping point was continued tax increases and even more proposed tax increases. … I have absolutely no regrets.”
Businesses have been fleeing California as well , and just recently, it was learned that tech giants Elon Musk and Larry Ellison were moving their companies, Tesla and Oracle, to more business-friendly states and taking tens of thousands of jobs with them.
Californians have also expressed increased frustration with state and local governments over strict coronavirus lockdowns, evidenced by large protests across the state and a recall effort aimed at removing Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom from office that has gained enough steam to cause his team concern .
The coronavirus pandemic has also forced many in California to work from home, which makes living close to work less important and a potential move easier to commit to, especially when the same salary can be earned in a less expensive state.
“It’s really sped up the out-migration quite a bit,” Fuller said about the shift to remote employment. “People have options now, and you pair that with people’s frustration on several different levels — I don’t see it changing.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-19--“DON’T MENTION JOE BEING INVOLVED”: Secret Text Messages Expose Beijing Biden’s Direct Link To China

In text messages dating back to 2017 , Hunter ’ s now-ex-associates James Gilliar and Tony Bobulinski discussed a breakdown of the joint venture with CEFC , the “ stakes ” and appeared to hint at discussions about getting the now-president-elect involved . ]
HUNTER BIDEN IN 2017 EXTENDED ‘ BEST WISHES ’ FROM THE ‘ ENTIRE BIDEN FAMILY ’ TO CHAIRMAN OF CHINESE ENERGY FIRM , REQUESTS $ 10 MILLION WIRE In a back-and-forth over the terms of the company , Gilliar , in a May 11 , 2017 text message to Bobulinski , wrote : “ Man U @ @ @ @ @ @ @ company set up , then tell H and family the high stakes and get Joe involved.
” It was unclear how the group , which included Gilliar , Bobulinski , Hunter Biden , Jim Biden , and Rob Walker , may have intended to get Biden involved .
Biden repeatedly has denied being involved with his son ’ s business dealings .
In another exchange , Bobulinski , in a text message to Gilliar on April 30 , 2017 , asked , “ what is the deal w Jim Biden as he wasn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now seems a focal point.
” Gilliar replied : “ With H demons , could be good to have a back up , he strengthens our USP to Chinese as it looks like a truly family business , and I like the dude.
” “ USP ” in business dealings typically stands for “ unique selling proposition ” or “ unique selling point.
” A source , though , said “ USP ” could also stand for U.S. persons .
Days earlier , in a conversation regarding a meeting which included what appeared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chairman—slated for Sunday , May 7 , 2017— Gilliar asked Bobulinski to come up with an “ a lister to meet chairman Sunday.
” “ Top person at same level as chairman , who would like to access China or money , ” Gilliar replied .
“ It ’ s the way it works culturally for them.
” Gilliar added : “ And empowers the B family so therefore us.
” The following day , Gilliar texted Bobulinski : “ Think Joe may come Sunday .
I ’ m hoping.
” “ Yah @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s a no brainer if he can make it he should be there , ” Bobulinski replied on May 5 , 2017 .
A source familiar told Fox News that Joe Biden did not attend the May 7 , 2017 meeting .
The text messages came during what appeared to be a critical time in the organization of the joint-venture — between Hunter and Jim Biden and their associates , Gilliar , Bobulinski and Rob Walker .
The venture , called Sinohawk Holdings , was meant to be a partnership with Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ came to fruition and the transfer of CEFC funds to Sinohawk Holdings never took place .
HUNTER BIDEN REQUESTED KEYS FOR NEW ‘ OFFICE MATES ’ JOE BIDEN , CHINESE ‘ EMISSARY ’ TO CEFC CHAIRMAN , EMAILS SHOW In another text exchange on May 18 , 2017 , between Gilliar and Bobulinski , the two discussed the joint venture again .
This time , Bobulinski raised “ concerns ” about the structure of the undertaking .
“ H brought in Jim simply to leverage getting more equity for himself and family in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Bobulinski texted .
“ I know why the [ sic ] wants the deal and what makes it enormous , it ’ s the family name in reality , they could have asked for 51 per cent , maybe u would not be interested but many US moguls would have been.
” The following day , in an extended discussion , Bobulinski asked Gilliar if he had spoken to “ rob or H. ” “ No I haven ’ t , ” Gilliar replied .
“ Spoke with Jim 15 mins @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to call u , think he ’ s with Joe in Wilmington.
” Two days later , on May 20 , 2017 , Gilliar texts Bobulinski again , stating : “ Don ’ t mention Joe being involved , it ’ s only when u are face to face , I know u know that but they are paranoid.
” “ OK they should be paranoid about things , ” Bobulinski says .
Gilliar , in October , issued a statement to the Wall Street Journal “ to clear up any speculation that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2017 discussions about our potential business structure.
” “ I am unaware of any involvement at any time of the former Vice President , ” Gilliar told the Journal in October .
Gilliar did not respond to Fox News ’ request for comment on the text messages appearing to reference Joe Biden .
Fox News exclusively reported in October , after obtaining text messages , that Bobulinski met with Joe Biden in early May 2017 on the sidelines of the Milken Conference in California .
Days after that meeting , Gilliar sent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for those involved in the deal .
The email included a note that “ Hunter [ Biden ] has some office expectations he will elaborate.
” A proposed equity split referenced “ 20 ” for “ H ” and “ 10 held by H for the big guy ?
” with no further details .
Bobulinski repeatedly has said “ the big guy ” was Joe Biden.= “ Joe Biden has never even considered being involved in business with his family , nor in any overseas business whatsoever , ” Biden campaign spokesman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ He has never held stock in any such business arrangements nor has any family member or any other person ever held stock for him .
The Biden campaign released the former vice president ’ s tax documents and returns , which did not reflect any involvement with Chinese investments .
The Biden transition declined to comment to Fox News .
Hunter Biden confirmed last week that he is under federal investigation for his “ tax affairs.
” A well-placed government source told Fox News that Hunter Biden has been a subject/target @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the source , a “ target ” means that there is a “ high probability that person committed a crime , ” while a “ subject ” is someone you “ don ’ t know for sure ” has committed a crime .
The source said President-elect Biden is not a subject of any grand jury investigation at this time .
The source also told Fox News that this investigation was predicated , in part , by Suspicious Activity Reports ( SARs ) regarding suspicious foreign transactions .
Another source familiar with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were regarding funds from “ China and other foreign nations.
” A Treasury Department official , who did not comment on the investigation , spoke broadly about SARs , telling Fox News that SARs are filed by financial institutions “ if there is something out of the ordinary about a particular transaction.
” The official told Fox News that the mere filing of a SAR does not mean there has been a criminal act , or violation of regulations , but instead , flags that a transaction is “ out of the ordinary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noted , though , that a SAR could be part of a money laundering or tax investigation .
The investigation , according to a source familiar with the matter , began in 2018 .

In text messages dating back to 2017, Hunter’s now-ex-associates James Gilliar and Tony Bobulinski discussed a breakdown of the joint venture with CEFC, the “stakes” and appeared to hint at discussions about getting the now-president-elect involved.]
HUNTER BIDEN IN 2017 EXTENDED ‘BEST WISHES’ FROM THE ‘ENTIRE BIDEN FAMILY’ TO CHAIRMAN OF CHINESE ENERGY FIRM, REQUESTS $10 MILLION WIRE
In a back-and-forth over the terms of the company, Gilliar, in a May 11, 2017 text message to Bobulinski, wrote: “Man U are right let’s get the company set up, then tell H and family the high stakes and get Joe involved.”
It was unclear how the group, which included Gilliar, Bobulinski, Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, and Rob Walker, may have intended to get Biden involved.
Biden repeatedly has denied being involved with his son’s business dealings.
In another exchange, Bobulinski, in a text message to Gilliar on April 30, 2017, asked, “what is the deal w Jim Biden as he wasn’t part of the discussion but now seems a focal point.”
Gilliar replied: “With H demons, could be good to have a back up, he strengthens our USP to Chinese as it looks like a truly family business, and I like the dude.”
“USP” in business dealings typically stands for “unique selling proposition” or “unique selling point.” A source, though, said “USP” could also stand for U.S. persons.
Days earlier, in a conversation regarding a meeting which included what appeared to be high-level CEFC executives including the chairman—slated for Sunday, May 7, 2017— Gilliar asked Bobulinski to come up with an “a lister to meet chairman Sunday.”
“Ok. A ‘lister’?” Bobulinski replied on May 4, 2017.
“Top person at same level as chairman, who would like to access China or money,” Gilliar replied. “It’s the way it works culturally for them.”
Gilliar added: “And empowers the B family so therefore us.”
The following day, Gilliar texted Bobulinski: “Think Joe may come Sunday. I’m hoping.”
“Yah I told Jim [Biden] that’s a no brainer if he can make it he should be there,” Bobulinski replied on May 5, 2017.
Gilliar replied: “Agreed.”
A source familiar told Fox News that Joe Biden did not attend the May 7, 2017 meeting.
The text messages came during what appeared to be a critical time in the organization of the joint-venture — between Hunter and Jim Biden and their associates, Gilliar, Bobulinski and Rob Walker. The venture, called Sinohawk Holdings, was meant to be a partnership with Chinese energy firm CEFC.
[the_ad id=”110283″]
The venture never came to fruition and the transfer of CEFC funds to Sinohawk Holdings never took place.
HUNTER BIDEN REQUESTED KEYS FOR NEW ‘OFFICE MATES’ JOE BIDEN, CHINESE ‘EMISSARY’ TO CEFC CHAIRMAN, EMAILS SHOW
In another text exchange on May 18, 2017, between Gilliar and Bobulinski, the two discussed the joint venture again. This time, Bobulinski raised “concerns” about the structure of the undertaking.
“H brought in Jim simply to leverage getting more equity for himself and family in the final hour, that is evident,” Bobulinski texted.
“I know why the [sic] wants the deal and what makes it enormous, it’s the family name in reality, they could have asked for 51 per cent, maybe u would not be interested but many US moguls would have been.”
Gilliar added: “Ye wants.”
The following day, in an extended discussion, Bobulinski asked Gilliar if he had spoken to “rob or H.”
“No I haven’t,” Gilliar replied. “Spoke with Jim 15 mins ago and told him to get H to call u, think he’s with Joe in Wilmington.”
Two days later, on May 20, 2017, Gilliar texts Bobulinski again, stating: “Don’t mention Joe being involved, it’s only when u are face to face, I know u know that but they are paranoid.”
“OK they should be paranoid about things,” Bobulinski says.
Gilliar replies: “For real.”
Gilliar, in October, issued a statement to the Wall Street Journal “to clear up any speculation that former Vice President Biden was involved with the 2017 discussions about our potential business structure.”
“I am unaware of any involvement at any time of the former Vice President,” Gilliar told the Journal in October.
Gilliar did not respond to Fox News’ request for comment on the text messages appearing to reference Joe Biden.
Fox News exclusively reported in October, after obtaining text messages, that Bobulinski met with Joe Biden in early May 2017 on the sidelines of the Milken Conference in California.
HUNTER BIDEN EX-BUSINESS ASSOCIATE TEXT MESSAGES INDICATE MEETING WITH JOE BIDEN
Days after that meeting, Gilliar sent an email discussing “renumeration packages” for those involved in the deal. The email included a note that “Hunter [Biden] has some office expectations he will elaborate.”
A proposed equity split referenced “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” with no further details. Bobulinski repeatedly has said “the big guy” was Joe Biden.=
“Joe Biden has never even considered being involved in business with his family, nor in any overseas business whatsoever,” Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates told Fox News in October. “He has never held stock in any such business arrangements nor has any family member or any other person ever held stock for him.
The Biden campaign released the former vice president’s tax documents and returns, which did not reflect any involvement with Chinese investments. The Biden transition declined to comment to Fox News.
Hunter Biden confirmed last week that he is under federal investigation for his “tax affairs.”
A well-placed government source told Fox News that Hunter Biden has been a subject/target of the grand jury investigation. According to the source, a “target” means that there is a “high probability that person committed a crime,” while a “subject” is someone you “don’t know for sure” has committed a crime.
The source said President-elect Biden is not a subject of any grand jury investigation at this time.
The source also told Fox News that this investigation was predicated, in part, by Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) regarding suspicious foreign transactions.
Another source familiar with the investigation told Fox News the SARs were regarding funds from “China and other foreign nations.”
A Treasury Department official, who did not comment on the investigation, spoke broadly about SARs, telling Fox News that SARs are filed by financial institutions “if there is something out of the ordinary about a particular transaction.”
The official told Fox News that the mere filing of a SAR does not mean there has been a criminal act, or violation of regulations, but instead, flags that a transaction is “out of the ordinary” for the customer. The official noted, though, that a SAR could be part of a money laundering or tax investigation.
The investigation, according to a source familiar with the matter, began in 2018.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-19--Some Insurers Now Refusing To Cover Downtown Portland Businesses

What rational insurance company would insure any business in Portland , given the mayor ’ s stance on crime and law enforcement .
And when small business owners can ’ t get insurance they can ’ t stay open .
Expect an exodus of small businesses from downtown Portland .
It ’ s so sad .
Some Insurers Now Refusing To Cover Downtown Portland Businesses The ongoing riots & looting by Antifa/BLM in downtown Portland has resulted in tens of millions in losses to businesses due to damages and lost customers .
The District Attorney in the county is big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a majority of charges brought against those who riot & loot .
Multnomah County DA Mike Schmidt ’ s office has refused to file charges against nearly 70 % of those arrested rioting & looting .
So it should come as no surprise that insurance companies are now starting to refuse to cover businesses in downtown Portland.And those who are lucky enough to get coverage see high premiums with less coverage and a bigger deductible .
The Oregonian reports on business owner Erick Murfitt who suffered $ 1 million in losses due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s insurance carrier told him they would not re renewing his policy , he went through other insurance companies and was declined by nearly a dozen .
He finally found an insurance company but not he ’ s paying a high premium while receiving less coverage .
“ brokers say insurance companies have become particularly wary about covering Portland businesses , especially those downtown , as ongoing protests have given the city a reputation for upheaval and led to a spike in vandalism and destruction , often committed by a small group @ @

What rational insurance company would insure any business in Portland, given the mayor’s stance on crime and law enforcement. And when small business owners can’t get insurance they can’t stay open. Expect an exodus of small businesses from downtown Portland. It’s so sad.
Some Insurers Now Refusing To Cover Downtown Portland Businesses By KTRH, December 18, 2020 The ongoing riots & looting by Antifa/BLM in downtown Portland has resulted in tens of millions in losses to businesses due to damages and lost customers. The District Attorney in the county is big fan of Antifa and thus has dismissed a majority of charges brought against those who riot & loot. Multnomah County DA Mike Schmidt’s office has refused to file charges against nearly 70% of those arrested rioting & looting. So it should come as no surprise that insurance companies are now starting to refuse to cover businesses in downtown Portland.And those who are lucky enough to get coverage see high premiums with less coverage and a bigger deductible. The Oregonian reports on business owner Erick Murfitt who suffered $1 million in losses due to looting back in May. When Murfitt’s insurance carrier told him they would not re renewing his policy, he went through other insurance companies and was declined by nearly a dozen. He finally found an insurance company but not he’s paying a high premium while receiving less coverage. The Oregonian reports: “brokers say insurance companies have become particularly wary about covering Portland businesses, especially those downtown, as ongoing protests have given the city a reputation for upheaval and led to a spike in vandalism and destruction, often committed by a small group of people… [the_ad id=”110283″]
Insurers’ apparent reluctance to cover Portland businesses is another indication of how severely this year’s turbulence has affected the city and its image. And it represents another hurdle for small business owners, who are trying to overcome the pandemic’s profound effect on shopping and work habits and the physical damage from sporadic attacks on storefronts. Jessica Getman, president of Brown & Brown Insurance Northwest, said that some insurance carriers have placed moratoriums on issuing new commercial insurance policies or increasing coverage for existing customers in downtown Portland, creating a barrier for anyone trying to open a new business. She said it is not uncommon for carriers to place temporary pauses on issuing new policies in areas where there is a perceived increased risk, such as when there are wildfires nearby. While Getman said most insurance carriers aren’t walking away from existing customers in downtown Portland, she said owners who have had to file claims for property loss and damage this year could have a harder time renewing their policies or finding affordable options that offer property coverage.”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-19--Dueling Electors and the Upcoming Joint Session of Congress

The Epoch Times has provided us with this most excellent primer/explainer : Dueling Electors and the Upcoming Joint Session of Congress Presidential candidates in the United States win elections by winning the most electoral votes .
The Electoral College system apportions a certain number of votes to each state .
When voters in a state vote for a party ’ s candidate , they ’ re actually casting a vote for that party ’ s slate of electors , or people chosen to cast electoral votes .
Those electoral votes are counted by Congress .
If a candidate gets 270 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Dueling Electors In seven states on Dec. 14 , a slate of Democratic electors chose Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden .
Republican electors , even though Biden was certified as the winner in the states , also cast votes for President Donald Trump .
The phenomenon created seven sets of so-called dueling electors , or alternate slates .
Both groups are sending certificates of ascertainment to Congress , which is slated to convene in a joint session on Jan. 6 , 2021 , to count electoral votes .
Dueling electors are highly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. history .
The last time was in the 1960 election , when the governor of Hawaii certified electors for Republican Richard Nixon .
Democratic electors cast their votes for Democrat John F. Kennedy .
A subsequent recount determined Kennedy actually won the state , and he was declared the winner in the joint session in 1961 .
John Eastman , professor of law at the Chapman University School of Law , pointed to the Kennedy-Nixon scenario when talking about the seven dueling electors this time around .
“ We have historical precedent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states , there is pending litigation challenging the results of the election .
If that litigation proved successful , then the Trump electors , having met and voted , would be able to have those votes certified and be the ones properly counted in the joint session of Congress on January 6 , ” he told NTD .
Gary Gregg II , director of the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville , told The Epoch Times that short of “ actual evidence of fraud ” that would move Congress to certify the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certified by the state ’ s governors—all for Biden , in this case—will be the ones counted .
The electoral votes have been “ officially counted ” and the votes have been sent on , he said .
“ There ’ s nothing to be done , until it gets to Congress , ” he said .
“ It ’ s obviously a very , very long shot , ” added Robert Hardaway , professor at the Sturm College of Law at the University of Denver , because “ all the challenges have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his supporters.
” “ But that ’ s the reason for it , ” he told The Epoch Times .
“ If later it ’ s determined the Republican slate should have been elected , they ’ ll have the vote already in place.
” In three of the seven states in question—Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin—Republicans currently control the state legislatures while Democrats hold the governor ’ s mansions .
In New Mexico and Nevada , Democrats control both .
In Georgia and Arizona , Republicans control both .
Republicans have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to get the dueling electors certified by the top election official—usually the secretary of state—nor did the state legislatures exercise their constitutional right to take back the power to choose which candidate to give the electoral votes to .
According to the Congressional Research Service , when dueling slates are received , members of Congress in the joint session consider the list when its from a different state authority than the certified list , and conduct a vote .
Acceptance of either slate would then require a concurrent agreement in both the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t a conflict in terms of state authority , the one determined to be appointed pursuant to the state ’ s election laws is counted .
If there is no determination by a state authority of which slate was lawfully appointed , the two chambers agree concurrently to accept the votes of one set , or decide not to accept either set .
If the two chambers don ’ t agree , the electors certified by the governor shall be counted .
After electors cast their votes this week , attention turned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ takes place just three days after newly elected members of Congress are sworn in .
At least four people who will be in the House—Rep .
Mo Brooks ( R-Ala. ) and Rep.-elects Marjorie Taylor Greene ( R-Ga. ) , Barry Moore ( R-Ala. ) , and Bob Good ( R-Va. ) —have committed to filing objections during the session .
Objections must be made in writing by at least one representative and one senator .
No senators have committed to objecting .
Challenges were made by Democrats in 2016 but failed because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Rep. Stephanie Tubb Jones ( D-Ohio ) and Sen. Barbara Boxer ( D-Calif. ) objected to votes from Ohio , but both chambers voted the objection down .
The basis for an objection appears to be that the electoral vote or votes were not “ regularly given ” by an electors , and/or that the elector was not “ lawfully certified , ” based on state election laws , according to the Congressional Research Service .
If an objection meets the requirements , the joint session is suspended , and each chamber @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and choose whether to vote to uphold it .
Unless both chambers vote in the majority for the objection , it fails .
If it ’ s approved , it nullifies the state ’ s electoral votes , or could lead to the alternate slate being accepted .
Some experts see an objection succeeding as practically impossible .
“ It ’ s so far out of the realm of possibility , ” Gregg said .
“ The chance of getting a senator to agree , a Republican senator to agree , is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the House to agree ?
At this point … this is not going to happen.
” “ Both chambers will not approve objections , ” Alan Dershowitz , a constitutional law scholar , told NTD Television via email .
Others aren ’ t so sure .
“ I think when you get to the joint session of Congress , there ’ s going to be a fight about which of the slates of electors need to be counted based on the evidence and the statutory violations that are presented at the time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the current certified vote count , Biden has 306 electoral votes to Trump ’ s 232 .
The Epoch Times is not calling the race at this time .
In 1877 , a joint session of Congress met to count electoral votes and faced dueling electors from multiple states where vote tallies were controversial .
The Democrat-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate eventually came to a compromise , creating a commission that included House members , senators , and Supreme Court justices .
The commission met for weeks before deciding on March 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hayes , a Republican , handing him the election .

The Epoch Times has provided us with this most excellent primer/explainer:
Dueling Electors and the Upcoming Joint Session of Congress
Presidential candidates in the United States win elections by winning the most electoral votes.
By Zachary Stieber, The Epoch Times, December 17, 2020:
The Electoral College system apportions a certain number of votes to each state. When voters in a state vote for a party’s candidate, they’re actually casting a vote for that party’s slate of electors, or people chosen to cast electoral votes.
Those electoral votes are counted by Congress. If a candidate gets 270 or more, they win the presidency.
Dueling Electors
In seven states on Dec. 14, a slate of Democratic electors chose Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden. Republican electors, even though Biden was certified as the winner in the states, also cast votes for President Donald Trump.
The phenomenon created seven sets of so-called dueling electors, or alternate slates. Both groups are sending certificates of ascertainment to Congress, which is slated to convene in a joint session on Jan. 6, 2021, to count electoral votes.
Dueling electors are highly unusual, but they have happened in U.S. history. The last time was in the 1960 election, when the governor of Hawaii certified electors for Republican Richard Nixon. Democratic electors cast their votes for Democrat John F. Kennedy.
A subsequent recount determined Kennedy actually won the state, and he was declared the winner in the joint session in 1961.
John Eastman, professor of law at the Chapman University School of Law, pointed to the Kennedy-Nixon scenario when talking about the seven dueling electors this time around.
“We have historical precedent here, and in each of these states, there is pending litigation challenging the results of the election. If that litigation proved successful, then the Trump electors, having met and voted, would be able to have those votes certified and be the ones properly counted in the joint session of Congress on January 6,” he told NTD.
Gary Gregg II, director of the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville, told The Epoch Times that short of “actual evidence of fraud” that would move Congress to certify the alternate set of electors, the ones certified by the state’s governors—all for Biden, in this case—will be the ones counted.
The electoral votes have been “officially counted” and the votes have been sent on, he said. “There’s nothing to be done, until it gets to Congress,” he said.
“It’s obviously a very, very long shot,” added Robert Hardaway, professor at the Sturm College of Law at the University of Denver, because “all the challenges have not been successful by both Trump and his supporters.”
“But that’s the reason for it,” he told The Epoch Times. “If later it’s determined the Republican slate should have been elected, they’ll have the vote already in place.”
In three of the seven states in question—Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—Republicans currently control the state legislatures while Democrats hold the governor’s mansions. In New Mexico and Nevada, Democrats control both. In Georgia and Arizona, Republicans control both.
Republicans have not been able to gain enough support to get the dueling electors certified by the top election official—usually the secretary of state—nor did the state legislatures exercise their constitutional right to take back the power to choose which candidate to give the electoral votes to.
According to the Congressional Research Service, when dueling slates are received, members of Congress in the joint session consider the list when its from a different state authority than the certified list, and conduct a vote. Acceptance of either slate would then require a concurrent agreement in both the House and the Senate.
If there isn’t a conflict in terms of state authority, the one determined to be appointed pursuant to the state’s election laws is counted. If there is no determination by a state authority of which slate was lawfully appointed, the two chambers agree concurrently to accept the votes of one set, or decide not to accept either set. If the two chambers don’t agree, the electors certified by the governor shall be counted.
[the_ad id=”110283″]
Joint Session
After electors cast their votes this week, attention turned to the upcoming joint session, which takes place just three days after newly elected members of Congress are sworn in.
At least four people who will be in the House—Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) and Rep.-elects Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Barry Moore (R-Ala.), and Bob Good (R-Va.)—have committed to filing objections during the session.
Objections must be made in writing by at least one representative and one senator. No senators have committed to objecting.
Challenges were made by Democrats in 2016 but failed because no senators supported them. In 2004, Rep. Stephanie Tubb Jones (D-Ohio) and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) objected to votes from Ohio, but both chambers voted the objection down.
The basis for an objection appears to be that the electoral vote or votes were not “regularly given” by an electors, and/or that the elector was not “lawfully certified,” based on state election laws, according to the Congressional Research Service.
If an objection meets the requirements, the joint session is suspended, and each chamber withdraws to meet and debate the objection and choose whether to vote to uphold it. Unless both chambers vote in the majority for the objection, it fails. If it’s approved, it nullifies the state’s electoral votes, or could lead to the alternate slate being accepted.
Some experts see an objection succeeding as practically impossible.
“It’s so far out of the realm of possibility,” Gregg said. “The chance of getting a senator to agree, a Republican senator to agree, is a difficulty. Then to get the Senate and the House to agree? At this point … this is not going to happen.”
“Both chambers will not approve objections,” Alan Dershowitz, a constitutional law scholar, told NTD Television via email.
Others aren’t so sure.
“I think when you get to the joint session of Congress, there’s going to be a fight about which of the slates of electors need to be counted based on the evidence and the statutory violations that are presented at the time,” Eastman said.
As of the current certified vote count, Biden has 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232. The Epoch Times is not calling the race at this time.
In 1877, a joint session of Congress met to count electoral votes and faced dueling electors from multiple states where vote tallies were controversial. The Democrat-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate eventually came to a compromise, creating a commission that included House members, senators, and Supreme Court justices.
The commission met for weeks before deciding on March 2 to award contested electoral votes to Rutherford Hayes, a Republican, handing him the election.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-21--Trump Campaign taking Constitutional fight to Supreme Court

80 million Americans stand shoulder to shoulder with the Great One .
President Trump ’ s campaign today issued the following statement : “ Donald J. Trump for President , Inc. , President Trump ’ s campaign committee , today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US .
Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania ’ s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore .
This represents the Campaign ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore .
“ This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘ the constitutionality of the [ Pennsylvania ] Supreme Court ’ s decision [ extending the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots from 8 pm on election day to 5 pm three days later ] … has national importance , and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.
’ “ The Campaign ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature ’ s protections against mail ballot fraud , including ( a ) prohibiting election officials checking whether signatures on mail ballots are genuine during canvassing on Election Day , ( b ) eliminating the right of campaigns to challenge mail ballots during canvassing for forged signatures and other irregularities , ( c ) holding that the rights of campaigns to observe the canvassing of mail ballots only meant that they only were allowed to be ‘ in the room ’ – in this case , the Philadelphia Convention @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fields , and ( d ) eliminating the statutory requirements that voters properly sign , address , and date mail ballots .
“ The petition seeks all appropriate remedies , including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements .
The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration , asking the Supreme Court to order responses by December 23 and a reply by December 24 to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets on January 6 to consider the votes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to read the Campaign ’ s Petition .
Click here to read the Campaign ’ s Motion .

80 million Americans stand shoulder to shoulder with the Great One.
Trump Campaign taking Constitutional fight to Supreme Court
President Trump’s campaign today issued the following statement:
“Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., President Trump’s campaign committee, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the US. Supreme Court to reverse a trio of Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases which illegally changed Pennsylvania’s mail balloting law immediately before and after the 2020 presidential election in violation of Article II of the United States Constitution and Bush v. Gore.
This represents the Campaign’s first independent U.S. Supreme Court filing and seeks relief based on the same Constitutional arguments successfully raised in Bush v. Gore.
“This petition follows a related Pennsylvania case where Justice Alito and two other justices observed ‘the constitutionality of the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court’s decision [extending the statutory deadline for receipt of mail ballots from 8 pm on election day to 5 pm three days later] … has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.’
“The Campaign’s petition seeks to reverse three decisions which eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature’s protections against mail ballot fraud, including (a) prohibiting election officials checking whether signatures on mail ballots are genuine during canvassing on Election Day, (b) eliminating the right of campaigns to challenge mail ballots during canvassing for forged signatures and other irregularities, (c) holding that the rights of campaigns to observe the canvassing of mail ballots only meant that they only were allowed to be ‘in the room’ – in this case, the Philadelphia Convention Center – the size of several football fields, and (d) eliminating the statutory requirements that voters properly sign, address, and date mail ballots.
“The petition seeks all appropriate remedies, including vacating the appointment of electors committed to Joseph Biden and allowing the Pennsylvania General Assembly to select their replacements. The Campaign also moved for expedited consideration, asking the Supreme Court to order responses by December 23 and a reply by December 24 to allow the U.S. Supreme Court to rule before Congress meets on January 6 to consider the votes of the electoral college.”
– Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump
Click here to read the Campaign’s Petition.
Click here to read the Campaign’s Motion.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-20--Report: Saudi authorities remove antisemitic, anti-Zionist content from textbooks

Made possible by the greatest POTUS in history .
It is just a matter of time before Israel and Saudi Arabia establish full diplomatic relations .
What President Trump has accomplished in the Middle East is a miracle .
The Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education finds attitudes in the kingdom towards Israel are becoming “ more balanced and tolerant.
” Saudi authorities have been removing anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist content from the country ’ s textbooks for the coming school year , a report by the Jerusalem-based Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amid growing speculation of a potential rapprochement between the Jewish state and the Arab Gulf power .
Saudi Arabia ’ s neighbors , the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain , normalized ties with Israel in September in a deal brokered by the United States .
Washington has made it no secret that it would like to see Riyadh join the Abraham Accords before U.S. President Donald Trump ’ s term in office ends next month .
The monitoring group said that while it “ did not find that new tolerant material had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amount of offensive material had been removed.
” The report said that many of the books no longer include the prediction of a religious war in which Muslims would annihilate all Jews .
Furthermore , the classic anti-Semitic trope saying that “ Zionist forces ” use nefarious methods to control the world has been dropped .
“ Examining the trendline of our 2002 , 2008 and even 2019 reports of the Saudi curriculum , it is clear that these new 2020 textbooks represent an institutional effort to modernize the Kingdom ’ s curriculum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sheff .
“ The Saudi authorities have begun a process of rooting out anti-Jewish hate.
” Attitudes towards Israel are becoming “ more balanced and tolerant , ” the institute said , giving as an example the removal of an entire chapter that was titled “ the Zionist danger , ” which delegitimized Israel ’ s right to exist .
More generally , the majority of references to jihad have been removed , whereas a decade ago the focus of the curriculum was to prepare students for martyrdom , the group found .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ does still remain in the curriculum , ” IMPACT-se noted .
Hatred of Jews is still present , including “ a decontextualized and ambiguous ” story about Jewish “ wrongdoers , ” who are described as monkeys .

Made possible by the greatest POTUS in history. It is just a matter of time before Israel and Saudi Arabia establish full diplomatic relations. What President Trump has accomplished in the Middle East is a miracle.
Report: Saudi authorities remove anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist content from textbooks
The Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education finds attitudes in the kingdom towards Israel are becoming “more balanced and tolerant.”
By JNS, December 20th, 2020
Saudi authorities have been removing anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist content from the country’s textbooks for the coming school year, a report by the Jerusalem-based Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education has found.
The report came amid growing speculation of a potential rapprochement between the Jewish state and the Arab Gulf power. Saudi Arabia’s neighbors, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, normalized ties with Israel in September in a deal brokered by the United States. Washington has made it no secret that it would like to see Riyadh join the Abraham Accords before U.S. President Donald Trump’s term in office ends next month.
The monitoring group said that while it “did not find that new tolerant material had been injected into the curriculum, a substantial amount of offensive material had been removed.”
The report said that many of the books no longer include the prediction of a religious war in which Muslims would annihilate all Jews. Furthermore, the classic anti-Semitic trope saying that “Zionist forces” use nefarious methods to control the world has been dropped.
“Examining the trendline of our 2002, 2008 and even 2019 reports of the Saudi curriculum, it is clear that these new 2020 textbooks represent an institutional effort to modernize the Kingdom’s curriculum,” said IMPACT-se CEO, Marcus Sheff. “The Saudi authorities have begun a process of rooting out anti-Jewish hate.”
Attitudes towards Israel are becoming “more balanced and tolerant,” the institute said, giving as an example the removal of an entire chapter that was titled “the Zionist danger,” which delegitimized Israel’s right to exist.
More generally, the majority of references to jihad have been removed, whereas a decade ago the focus of the curriculum was to prepare students for martyrdom, the group found.
“This being said, anti-Israel content does still remain in the curriculum,” IMPACT-se noted. Hatred of Jews is still present, including “a decontextualized and ambiguous” story about Jewish “wrongdoers,” who are described as monkeys.