pamelagellerreport--2020-12-08--Chinese Sex Spy Targeted Democrat Politicians, Raised Money For Eric Swalwell, Planted Intern In His

Chinese Sex Spy Targeted Democrat Politicians, Raised Money For Eric Swalwell, Planted Intern In His Office, ‘Using Sexual Relationships’

Why it matters : The alleged operation offers a rare window into how Beijing has tried to gain access to and influence U.S. political circles .
• While this suspected operative ’ s activities appear to have ended during the Obama administration , concerns about Beijing ’ s influence operations have spanned President Trump ’ s time in office and will continue to be a core focus for U.S. counterintelligence during the Biden administration .
The woman at the center of the operation , a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang , targeted up-and-coming local politicians in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had the potential to make it big on the national stage .
• Through campaign fundraising , extensive networking , personal charisma , and romantic or sexual relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors , Fang was able to gain proximity to political power , according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials and one former elected official .
• Even though U.S. officials do not believe Fang received or passed on classified information , the case “ was a big deal , because there were some really , really sensitive people that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ network , a current senior U.S. intelligence official said .
• Private but unclassified information about government officials — such as their habits , preferences , schedules , social networks , and even rumors about them — is a form of political intelligence .
Collecting such information is a key part of what foreign intelligence agencies do .
Among the most significant targets of Fang ’ s efforts was Rep. Eric Swalwell ( D-Calif. ) .
• Fang took part in fundraising activity for Swalwell ’ s 2014 re-election campaign , according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ current U.S. intelligence official .
Swalwell ’ s office was directly aware of these activities on its behalf , the political operative said .
That same political operative , who witnessed Fang fundraising on Swalwell ’ s behalf , found no evidence of illegal contributions .
• Federal Election Commission records don ’ t indicate Fang herself made donations , which are prohibited from foreign nationals .
• Fang helped place at least one intern in Swalwell ’ s office , according to those same two people , and interacted with Swalwell at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years .
A statement from Swalwell ’ s office provided to Axios said : “ Rep .
Swalwell , long ago , provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago , and whom he hasn ’ t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI .
To protect information that might be classified , he will not participate in your story.
” What happened : Amid a widening counterintelligence probe , federal investigators became so alarmed by Fang ’ s behavior and activities that around 2015 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ giving him what is known as a defensive briefing .
• Swalwell immediately cut off all ties to Fang , according to a current U.S. intelligence official , and he has not been accused of any wrongdoing .
• Fang left the country unexpectedly in mid-2015 amid the investigation .
She did not respond to multiple attempts by Axios to reach her by email and Facebook .
Between the lines : The case demonstrates China ’ s strategy of cultivating relationships that may take years or even decades to bear fruit .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s mayors and city council members are tomorrow ’ s governors and members of Congress .
• In the years since the Fang probe , the FBI has prioritized investigations into Chinese influence operations , creating a unit in May 2019 within the bureau solely dedicated to countering Beijing ’ s activities at the state and local levels .
U.S. national security officials believe the threat posed by China has only grown with time .
• “ She was just one of lots of agents , ” said a current senior U.S. intelligence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a highly sophisticated malign foreign influence campaign , ” FBI director Chris Wray said in a July 2020 speech .
These efforts involve “ subversive , undeclared , criminal , or coercive attempts to sway our government ’ s policies , distort our country ’ s public discourse , and undermine confidence in our democratic processes and values , ” Wray said .
The FBI declined to comment .
The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment .
Details : Axios spoke with four current and former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a period of more than a year .
They requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media about the case .
• Axios also spoke with 22 current and former elected officials , political operatives , and former students who knew Fang personally when she was based in the United States .
Fang ’ s friends and acquaintances said she was in her late 20s or early 30s when she was based in the U.S. and was enrolled as a student at a Bay Area university .
She used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign rallies , and campus events to connect with elected officials and other prominent figures , according to U.S. intelligence officials , Bay Area political operatives , former students , and current and former elected officials who knew her .
• U.S. intelligence officials believed she was overseeing likely unwitting subagents whom she helped place in local political and congressional offices .
• Fang attended regional conferences for U.S. mayors , which allowed her to grow her network of politicians across the country .
• She also engaged in sexual or romantic relationships @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cities over a period of about three years , according to one U.S. intelligence official and one former elected official .
• At least two separate sexual interactions with elected officials , including one of these Midwestern mayors , were caught on FBI electronic surveillance of Fang , according to two intelligence officials .
Axios was unable to identify or speak to the elected officials .
Between 2011 and 2015 , Fang ’ s activities brought her into contact with many of the Bay Area ’ s most prominent politicos .
• She @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2014 House bid , according to a former campus organizer and social media posts .
( Khanna , a Democrat , was elected to the House in 2016 . )
Khanna ’ s office said he remembers seeing Fang at several Indian American political gatherings but did not have further contact with her .
Khanna ’ s office said the FBI did not brief him on her activities .
Khanna ’ s 2014 campaign staff said that Fang ’ s name does not appear in their staff records , though they said that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• Fang helped with a fundraiser for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard ( D-Hawaii ) in 2013 , according to a flyer from the event Fang shared on Facebook .
She appeared in photos over multiple years with a host of California politicians , including Khanna , Swalwell , Rep. Judy Chu ( D-Calif. ) and then-Rep. Mike Honda ( D-Calif. ) .
• Gabbard “ has no recollection of ever meeting or talking with her , nor any recollection of her playing a major role at the fundraiser , ” a spokesperson said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fremont City Councilmember Raj Salwan , whose name appears on the flyer , told Axios he was unaware of Fang ’ s role in the event and her name was added to the flyer by other Asian American leaders .
• Chu ’ s office said they have no records of Christine Fang .
Honda said he had no memory of meeting Fang .
The bottom line : U.S. officials believe Fang ’ s real reason for being in the U.S was to gather political intelligence and to influence rising U.S. officials on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a U.S. elected official and a covert Chinese intelligence operative can provide the Chinese government with opportunities to sway the opinion of key decision-makers .
• Beijing may aim to influence foreign policy issues directly related to China , or issues closer to home , such as partnering with Chinese companies for local investment — an issue particularly salient among local-level officials such as mayors and city council members .
Sounding the alarm : The U.S. response U.S. counterintelligence officials said they believe Fang acted at the direction of China ’ s Ministry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country ’ s main civilian spy agency .
• U.S. officials first noticed Fang through surveillance they were conducting on a different person — a suspected MSS officer working undercover as a diplomat in the San Francisco consulate , a current U.S. counterintelligence official said .
• The suspected officer used the consulate as a base to do outreach to state and local-level U.S. politicians , including inviting them on trips to China , the official said .
• The official added that both Fang and the suspected officer were focused on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Bay Area .
( Axios corroborated through U.S. State Department records that a Chinese diplomat with the same name as the suspected MSS officer was stationed in San Francisco during the period Fang was there . )
• Fang and the suspected officer met or spoke on numerous occasions , leading U.S. officials to look into Fang ’ s own background and activities , the official said .
• However , Fang ’ s main intelligence handlers were believed to be based in China , according to two U.S. officials .

Why it matters: The alleged operation offers a rare window into how Beijing has tried to gain access to and influence U.S. political circles.
While this suspected operative’s activities appear to have ended during the Obama administration, concerns about Beijing’s influence operations have spanned President Trump’s time in office and will continue to be a core focus for U.S. counterintelligence during the Biden administration.
Clockwise from top left: Fang with then-Dublin City Councilmember Eric Swalwell at an October 2012 student event; undated photo of Fang, now former Fremont Mayor Bill Harrison and Rep. Judy Chu; Fang with then-Rep. Mike Honda and then-San Jose city Councilmember Ash Kalra at a March 2014 event at the Chinese Embassy in D.C. Sources: Renren, Facebook, Facebook
The woman at the center of the operation, a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang, targeted up-and-coming local politicians in the Bay Area and across the country who had the potential to make it big on the national stage.
Through campaign fundraising, extensive networking, personal charisma, and romantic or sexual relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors, Fang was able to gain proximity to political power, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials and one former elected official.
Even though U.S. officials do not believe Fang received or passed on classified information, the case “was a big deal, because there were some really, really sensitive people that were caught up” in the intelligence network, a current senior U.S. intelligence official said.
Private but unclassified information about government officials — such as their habits, preferences, schedules, social networks, and even rumors about them — is a form of political intelligence. Collecting such information is a key part of what foreign intelligence agencies do.
Among the most significant targets of Fang’s efforts was Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.).
Fang took part in fundraising activity for Swalwell’s 2014 re-election campaign, according to a Bay Area political operative and a current U.S. intelligence official. Swalwell’s office was directly aware of these activities on its behalf, the political operative said. That same political operative, who witnessed Fang fundraising on Swalwell’s behalf, found no evidence of illegal contributions.
Federal Election Commission records don’t indicate Fang herself made donations, which are prohibited from foreign nationals.
Fang helped place at least one intern in Swalwell’s office, according to those same two people, and interacted with Swalwell at multiple events over the course of several years.
A statement from Swalwell’s office provided to Axios said: “Rep. Swalwell, long ago, provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago, and whom he hasn’t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI. To protect information that might be classified, he will not participate in your story.”
What happened: Amid a widening counterintelligence probe, federal investigators became so alarmed by Fang’s behavior and activities that around 2015 they alerted Swalwell to their concerns — giving him what is known as a defensive briefing.
Swalwell immediately cut off all ties to Fang, according to a current U.S. intelligence official, and he has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
Fang left the country unexpectedly in mid-2015 amid the investigation. She did not respond to multiple attempts by Axios to reach her by email and Facebook.
Between the lines: The case demonstrates China’s strategy of cultivating relationships that may take years or even decades to bear fruit. The Chinese Communist Party knows that today’s mayors and city council members are tomorrow’s governors and members of Congress.
In the years since the Fang probe, the FBI has prioritized investigations into Chinese influence operations, creating a unit in May 2019 within the bureau solely dedicated to countering Beijing’s activities at the state and local levels. U.S. national security officials believe the threat posed by China has only grown with time.
“She was just one of lots of agents,” said a current senior U.S. intelligence official.
Beijing “is engaged in a highly sophisticated malign foreign influence campaign,” FBI director Chris Wray said in a July 2020 speech. These efforts involve “subversive, undeclared, criminal, or coercive attempts to sway our government’s policies, distort our country’s public discourse, and undermine confidence in our democratic processes and values,” Wray said.
The FBI declined to comment. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.
Details: Axios spoke with four current and former U.S. intelligence officials about the case over a period of more than a year. They requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media about the case.
Axios also spoke with 22 current and former elected officials, political operatives, and former students who knew Fang personally when she was based in the United States.
The cover: How Fang worked
Fang’s friends and acquaintances said she was in her late 20s or early 30s when she was based in the U.S. and was enrolled as a student at a Bay Area university.
She used political gatherings, civic society conferences, campaign rallies, and campus events to connect with elected officials and other prominent figures, according to U.S. intelligence officials, Bay Area political operatives, former students, and current and former elected officials who knew her.
U.S. intelligence officials believed she was overseeing likely unwitting subagents whom she helped place in local political and congressional offices.
Fang attended regional conferences for U.S. mayors, which allowed her to grow her network of politicians across the country.
She also engaged in sexual or romantic relationships with at least two mayors of Midwestern cities over a period of about three years, according to one U.S. intelligence official and one former elected official.
At least two separate sexual interactions with elected officials, including one of these Midwestern mayors, were caught on FBI electronic surveillance of Fang, according to two intelligence officials. Axios was unable to identify or speak to the elected officials.
Between 2011 and 2015, Fang’s activities brought her into contact with many of the Bay Area’s most prominent politicos.
She volunteered for Ro Khanna’s unsuccessful 2014 House bid, according to a former campus organizer and social media posts. (Khanna, a Democrat, was elected to the House in 2016.) Khanna’s office said he remembers seeing Fang at several Indian American political gatherings but did not have further contact with her. Khanna’s office said the FBI did not brief him on her activities. Khanna’s 2014 campaign staff said that Fang’s name does not appear in their staff records, though they said that their records do not include all volunteers.
Flyer for fundraiser for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard. Source: Facebook
Fang helped with a fundraiser for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) in 2013, according to a flyer from the event Fang shared on Facebook. She appeared in photos over multiple years with a host of California politicians, including Khanna, Swalwell, Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) and then-Rep. Mike Honda (D-Calif.).
Gabbard “has no recollection of ever meeting or talking with her, nor any recollection of her playing a major role at the fundraiser,” a spokesperson said in an email to Axios.
Fremont City Councilmember Raj Salwan, whose name appears on the flyer, told Axios he was unaware of Fang’s role in the event and her name was added to the flyer by other Asian American leaders.
Chu’s office said they have no records of Christine Fang. Honda said he had no memory of meeting Fang.
From left: Fang with Fremont C ity Councilmember Raj Salwan (L) and then-U.S. House candidate Ro Khanna at a September 2013 fundraiser for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard; Fang helped organize a 2012 town hall for Rep. Judy Chu. Sources: Facebook
The bottom line: U.S. officials believe Fang’s real reason for being in the U.S was to gather political intelligence and to influence rising U.S. officials on China-related issues.
Close relationships between a U.S. elected official and a covert Chinese intelligence operative can provide the Chinese government with opportunities to sway the opinion of key decision-makers.
Beijing may aim to influence foreign policy issues directly related to China, or issues closer to home, such as partnering with Chinese companies for local investment — an issue particularly salient among local-level officials such as mayors and city council members.
Sounding the alarm: The U.S. response
U.S. counterintelligence officials said they believe Fang acted at the direction of China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS), the country’s main civilian spy agency.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-08--Top Chinese professor boasts of operatives in top of US ‘core inner circle’

He also included references to Biden ’ s son Hunter and his business dealings in the Communist country .
The media censored and scrubbed that story … .
Tucker Carlson segment on a video deleted from Chinese social media of a professor saying that China `` has people at the top of America 's core inner circle of power & influence . ''
pic.twitter.com/h3Ygy6UlHk Top Chinese professor boasts of operatives in top of US ‘ core inner circle ’ A recently recorded lecture showing a Chinese Communist Party expert explaining how Beijing had “ people at the top of America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found its way onto the internet in the United States after being censored in China .
The lecture , given by Di Dongsheng , vice dean of the School of International Relations at Renmin University , in late November also included references to President-elect Biden ’ s son Hunter and his business dealings in the Communist country .
Speaking about what was pushing the Chinese to accelerate the re-opening of their financial sectors , Di made the revelation that Beijing had a rarely discussed advantage in working with the US prior to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Trump administration is in a trade war with us , so why can ’ t we fix the Trump administration ?
Why did China and the US used to be able to settle all kinds of issues between 1992 and 2016 ?
” Di asked , going on to answer the question himself .
“ I ’ m going to throw out something maybe a little bit explosive here .
It ’ s just because we have people at the top .
We have our old friends who are at the top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of power & influence , ” the top Chinese political scientist continued .
Di added during the lecture that “ for the past 30 years , 40 years , we have been utilizing the core power of the United States.
” As for the future of the US-China relationship , Di appeared optimistic about China ’ s ability to thrive under an incoming President Biden .
“ During the US-China trade war , [ Wall Street ] tried to help , and I know that my friends on the US side told me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they couldn ’ t do much .
But now we ’ re seeing Biden was elected , the traditional elite , the political elite , the establishment , they ’ re very close to Wall Street , so you see that , right ?
” Di asked the audience , noting that the next administration would likely take a very different stance to that of President Trump .
Di went on to suggest that Hunter Biden , whose business dealings in Ukraine and China have come under scrutiny , received help from the @ @ @ @ @ @

He also included references to Biden’s son Hunter and his business dealings in the Communist country. The media censored and scrubbed that story ….
Tucker Carlson segment on a video deleted from Chinese social media of a professor saying that China "has people at the top of America's core inner circle of power & influence." pic.twitter.com/h3Ygy6UlHk
Top Chinese professor boasts of operatives in top of US ‘core inner circle’
By Emily Jacobs, New York Post, December 8, 2020 |
A recently recorded lecture showing a Chinese Communist Party expert explaining how Beijing had “people at the top of America’s core inner circle” has found its way onto the internet in the United States after being censored in China.
The lecture, given by Di Dongsheng, vice dean of the School of International Relations at Renmin University, in late November also included references to President-elect Biden’s son Hunter and his business dealings in the Communist country.
Speaking about what was pushing the Chinese to accelerate the re-opening of their financial sectors, Di made the revelation that Beijing had a rarely discussed advantage in working with the US prior to the Trump Administration.
“We know that the Trump administration is in a trade war with us, so why can’t we fix the Trump administration? Why did China and the US used to be able to settle all kinds of issues between 1992 and 2016?” Di asked, going on to answer the question himself.
“I’m going to throw out something maybe a little bit explosive here. It’s just because we have people at the top. We have our old friends who are at the top of America’s core inner circle of power & influence,” the top Chinese political scientist continued.
Di added during the lecture that “for the past 30 years, 40 years, we have been utilizing the core power of the United States.”
As for the future of the US-China relationship, Di appeared optimistic about China’s ability to thrive under an incoming President Biden.
“During the US-China trade war, [Wall Street] tried to help, and I know that my friends on the US side told me that they tried to help, but they couldn’t do much. But now we’re seeing Biden was elected, the traditional elite, the political elite, the establishment, they’re very close to Wall Street, so you see that, right?” Di asked the audience, noting that the next administration would likely take a very different stance to that of President Trump.
Di went on to suggest that Hunter Biden, whose business dealings in Ukraine and China have come under scrutiny, received help from the Chinese in his business efforts.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-08--Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules

“ This case presents a question of law : Did Defendant States violate the Electors Clause ( or..the Fourteenth Amendment ) by taking -or allowing- non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors ?
” Texas Sues Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution .
Texas argues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions , but not through the state legislatures .
Additionally , Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states , violating the Constitution ’ s Equal Protection Clause .
Finally , Texas argues that there were “ voting irregularities ” in these states as a result of the above .
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting .
The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received , evaluated , and counted .
Whether well intentioned or not , these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States .
Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state legislatures .
The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution .
This case presents a question of law : Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors ?
These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States ’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law , which , in turn , violated the Electors Clause of Article II , Section 1 , Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens ’ vote , but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution .
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction , such as disputes between two or more states .

Brilliant.
“This case presents a question of law: Did Defendant States violate the Electors Clause (or..the Fourteenth Amendment) by taking -or allowing- non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors?”
Texas Case Challenges Election Directly at Supreme Court
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.
By: Breitbart News, December 8, 2020:
Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:
Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. … This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.
Documents follow:
TX v State Motion 2020-12-0… by Breitbart News
TX v State Mpi 2020-12-07 F… by Breitbart News


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-08--💀 Biden DROPPED Out of Previous Presidential Race for Lying and Plagiarism

Did you know ?
Plagiarism at law school , plagiarism on the campaign trail .
• Former Vice President Joe Biden mounted an unsuccessful presidential campaign in 1988 .
• When incidents of plagiarism in campaign speeches and during his time in law school came to light , his campaign was soon suspended .
• “ My intent was not to deceive anyone , ” Biden wrote at the time .
” For if it were , I would not have been so blatant.
” • Biden is mulling another run at president in 2020 , of which an announcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plagiarism both on the campaign trail and during his time at the Syracuse University College of Law became some of the final issues that dogged Biden before he ultimately suspended his floundering campaign .
Read more : Joe Biden ’ s long history in public life could come back to haunt him if he decides to run for president During his failed 1988 run , Biden lifted portions of a speech by United Kingdom Labour MP and Margaret Thatcher challenger Neil Kinnock .
New York Times reporter Maureen Dowd reported on the fiasco @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the Iowa State Fair , Biden mimicked entire portions of Kinnock ’ s speech from earlier in the year .
At one moment , Biden repeated the line that he was the first “ in a thousand generations ” to graduate from college , gesturing to his wife in the exact same way Kinnock did , while also saying the same line about her education and lineage .
Biden would later acknowledge that he in fact did have relatives who attended college , directly contrasting the Kinnock lines .
As Dowd reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the allegations of blatant plagiarism .
Nevertheless , Biden dropped out of the race by the end of the month .

Did you know?
Plagiarism at law school, plagiarism on the campaign trail.
Former Vice President Joe Biden mounted an unsuccessful presidential campaign in 1988.
When incidents of plagiarism in campaign speeches and during his time in law school came to light, his campaign was soon suspended.
“My intent was not to deceive anyone,” Biden wrote at the time. ”For if it were, I would not have been so blatant.”
Biden is mulling another run at president in 2020, of which an announcement could come this month. Incidents of plagiarism both on the campaign trail and during his time at the Syracuse University College of Law became some of the final issues that dogged Biden before he ultimately suspended his floundering campaign. Read more: Joe Biden’s long history in public life could come back to haunt him if he decides to run for president During his failed 1988 run, Biden lifted portions of a speech by United Kingdom Labour MP and Margaret Thatcher challenger Neil Kinnock. New York Times reporter Maureen Dowd reported on the fiasco in September 1987. During an event at the Iowa State Fair, Biden mimicked entire portions of Kinnock’s speech from earlier in the year. At one moment, Biden repeated the line that he was the first “in a thousand generations” to graduate from college, gesturing to his wife in the exact same way Kinnock did, while also saying the same line about her education and lineage. Biden would later acknowledge that he in fact did have relatives who attended college, directly contrasting the Kinnock lines. As Dowd reported, Biden’s staffers were defensive about the allegations of blatant plagiarism. Nevertheless, Biden dropped out of the race by the end of the month.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-09--Ivanka Trump shares photo of father on Mount Rushmore

President Trump should be on Mount Rushmore .
It ’ s not even a question .
He is the greatest POTUS of our time ( no one else comes close ) , and arguably of all time .
The snapshot appeared similar to one the president had tweeted in August , when he denied a New York Times report that the White House had reached out to South Dakota Gov .
Kristi Noem ( R ) about adding his face to Mount Rushmore .
Trump wrote it was “ never suggested , ” although “ based on all of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1/2 years , perhaps more than any other Presidency , sounds like a good idea to me !
” When asked by The Hill last year if his head should be carved among the giant granite landmark , Trump replied , “ If I answer that question , ‘ Yes , ’ I will end up with such bad publicity.
” At a 2017 rally , Trump quipped to the crowd , “ I ’ d ask whether or not you think I will someday be on Mount Rushmore.
” The Truth Must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best @

President Trump should be on Mount Rushmore. It’s not even a question. He is the greatest POTUS of our time (no one else comes close), and arguably of all time.
Ivanka Trump shares photo of father on Mount Rushmore By The Hill, December 7, 2020 Ivanka Trump is sharing a photo of President Trump that shows him smiling alongside the past commanders in chief depicted on Mount Rushmore. Trump’s 39-year-old daughter, a White House senior adviser, tweeted the photo on Monday.
Amazing photo of @realDonaldTrump during his visit to Mount Rushmore on July 3, 2020 (???? AP /Alex Brandon) pic.twitter.com/indAz62v6B — Ivanka Trump (@IvankaTrump) December 7, 2020
The snapshot appeared similar to one the president had tweeted in August, when he denied a New York Times report that the White House had reached out to South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) about adding his face to Mount Rushmore. Trump wrote it was “never suggested,” although “based on all of the many things accomplished during the first 3 1/2 years, perhaps more than any other Presidency, sounds like a good idea to me!”
When asked by The Hill last year if his head should be carved among the giant granite landmark, Trump replied, “If I answer that question, ‘Yes,’ I will end up with such bad publicity.” At a 2017 rally, Trump quipped to the crowd, “I’d ask whether or not you think I will someday be on Mount Rushmore.”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-10--President Trump Asks Sen. Ted Cruz To Argue Texas Election Fraud Lawsuit At Supreme Court

President Trump has asked Texas Sen. Ted Cruz ( R ) to present a case from his state ’ s attorney general seeking to invalidate the election results of several key battleground states before the Supreme Court should it decide to hear the suit , The New York Times reported Wednesday .
The lawsuit from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ( R ) seeks to void the vote certifications of Pennsylvania , Wisconsin , Georgia and Michigan , arguing that the results are “ tainted ” by new election processes in those states .
The court has not yet agreed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and on Tuesday rejected efforts by pro-Trump attorneys to overturn the results in Pennsylvania in a separate case .
White House officials did not immediately return a request for comment from The Hill .
The president has for weeks refused to concede his election loss to Joe Biden and has launched legal efforts in multiple states , with no success thus far , to overturn the president-elect ’ s victory in key battlegrounds .
Legal experts have largely panned the president ’ s efforts as unserious thus far and have spared no criticism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s allies in Texas .
“ It looks like we have a new leader in the ‘ craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election ’ category , ” wrote Steve Vladeck , a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin , on Twitter .
News of the president ’ s request to Cruz comes shortly after he told his followers Wednesday in a tweet that he would be “ intervening ” in the Texas case while not specifying what that intervention would look like .
“ We will be INTERVENING @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states ) case .
This is the big one .
Our Country needs a victory !
” the president tweeted .

Praying.
Trump asks Cruz to argue Texas case
By John Bowden, The Hill, December 9, 2020:
President Trump has asked Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) to present a case from his state’s attorney general seeking to invalidate the election results of several key battleground states before the Supreme Court should it decide to hear the suit, The New York Times reported Wednesday.
The lawsuit from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) seeks to void the vote certifications of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Michigan, arguing that the results are “tainted” by new election processes in those states.
The court has not yet agreed to hear the case on its merits and on Tuesday rejected efforts by pro-Trump attorneys to overturn the results in Pennsylvania in a separate case.
White House officials did not immediately return a request for comment from The Hill. The president has for weeks refused to concede his election loss to Joe Biden and has launched legal efforts in multiple states, with no success thus far, to overturn the president-elect’s victory in key battlegrounds.
Legal experts have largely panned the president’s efforts as unserious thus far and have spared no criticism for the latest effort by Trump’s allies in Texas.
“It looks like we have a new leader in the ‘craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election’ category,” wrote Steve Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin, on Twitter.
News of the president’s request to Cruz comes shortly after he told his followers Wednesday in a tweet that he would be “intervening” in the Texas case while not specifying what that intervention would look like.
“We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!” the president tweeted.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-10--48 states and FCC File Antitrust Lawsuits To Break Up Facebook

For years we have been working to hold tech giants to account .
We had to go back to the drawing board in our 2016 lawsuit against these social media giants because welacked standing ’ despite Facebook ’ s relentless attacks on our pages .
The basis of our suit was challenging Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ( CDA ) under the First Amendment , which provides immunity from lawsuits to Facebook , Twitter , and YouTube , thereby permitting these social media giants to engage in government-sanctioned censorship and discriminatory business practices free from legal challenge .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all Internet ad revenue .
According to the Wall Street Journal : Ma Bell was broken up by the government , albeit for different reasons .
But it can and must be done .
AT & T has called for an “ Internet Bill of Rights ” and argued that Facebook and Google should also be subjected to rules that would prevent unfair censorship on their platforms .
AT & T , one of the largest telecommunications companies , called for Congress to enact an “ Internet Bill of Rights ” which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other content providers to rules that would prevent unfair censorship on Internet Service Providers ( ISPs ) such as Comcast or AT & T as well as content providers such as Facebook and Google .
AT & T CEO Randall Stephenson wrote , “ Congressional action is needed to establish an ‘ Internet Bill of Rights ’ that applies to all internet companies and guarantees neutrality , transparency , openness , non-discrimination and privacy protection for all internet users.
” Stephenson posted the ad in the New York Times , Washington Post , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The US government has used anti-trust laws to break up monopolies .
They ought to break up Facebook .
Section 2 of the Sherman Act highlights particular results deemed anticompetitive by nature and prohibits actions that ‘ shall monopolize , or attempt to monopolize , or combine or conspire with any other person or persons , to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States , or with foreign nations.
’ Couldn ’ t the same be applied to information ?
The United States government took down Standard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the American Tobacco Company and many others without nearly the power that Facebook has.
” Tech companies such as Google and Facebook are also utilities of sorts that provide essential services .
They depend on the free use of public airwaves .
Yet they are subject to little oversight ; they simply make up their own rules as they go along .
Antitrust laws prohibit one corporation from unfairly devouring its competition , capturing most of its market , and then price-gouging as it sees fit without fear of competition .
Google has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same manner that Facebook has driven out competing social media .
Clearly Mark Zuckerberg , Jack Dorsey , Sergey Brin , Eric Schmidt , and Jeff Bezos are contemporary but far less enlightened or talented “ robber barons.
” So why are they not smeared , defamed , and reviled like the robber barons of yesteryear ?
Says NRO : Why are huge tech companies seemingly exempt from the rules that older corporations must follow ?
First , their CEOs wisely cultivate the image of hipsters .
The public sees them more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and flip-flops than as updated versions of J. P. Morgan , John D. Rockefeller , or other robber barons of the past .
Second , the tech industry ’ s hierarchy is politically progressive .
In brilliant marketing fashion , the Internet , laptops , tablets , and smartphones have meshed with the hip youth culture of music , television , the movies , universities , and fashion .
Think Woodstock rather than Wall Street .
Corporate spokesmen at companies such as Twitter and YouTube brag about their social awareness , especially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ identity politics , and feminism .
Given that the regulatory deep state is mostly a liberal enterprise , the tech industry is seen as an ally of federal bureaucrats and regulators .
Think more of Hollywood , the media , and universities than Exxon , General Motors , Koch Industries , and Philip Morris .
The groovy t-shirt-turtleneck vibe may keep the great unwashed under their spell , but it ’ s the shared political ideology with the far left that keeps these corporate managers free from accountability .
The Federal Trade Commission @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Facebook on Wednesday alleging that the company engaged in unlawful behavior to eliminate its competition in social networking .
The FTC wants a federal judge to grant an injunction that could require Facebook to divest its assets , Instagram and WhatsApp .
“ Facebook ’ s actions to entrench and maintain its monopoly deny consumers the benefits of competition , ” said Ian Conner , director of the FTC ’ s bureau of competition , in a statement .
“ Our aim is to roll back Facebook ’ s anticompetitive conduct and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ competition can thrive.
” The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia argues that Facebook has enjoyed monopoly control for the personal social networking realm for much of the last decade .
“ Since toppling early rival Myspace and achieving monopoly power , Facebook has turned to playing defense through anticompetitive means , ” the lawsuit said .
“ After identifying two significant competitive threats to its dominant position — Instagram and WhatsApp — Facebook moved to squelch those threats by buying the companies , reflecting CEO Mark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a 2008 email , that ‘ it is better to buy than compete.
’ “ The 48 states , excluding Alabama and South Dakota , also filed a lawsuit in federal court in D.C. arguing that Facebook illegally maintained monopoly power via a “ buy-or-bury ” strategy .
“ Facebook ’ s unlawfully maintained monopoly power gives it wide latitude to set the terms for how its users ’ private information is collected , used , and protected , ” the states said in the lawsuit .
“ In addition , because Facebook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by users is displayed to other users , Facebook ’ s monopoly gives it significant control over how users engage with their closest connections and what content users see when they do.
” Facebook did not immediately comment on the FTC ’ s litigation .
The company ’ s stock tumbled more than 2 % on Wednesday as news of the FTC ’ s litigation broke .
Republican and Democratic lawmakers have also expressed an interest in cracking down on Big Tech and Wednesday ’ s litigation is the latest salvo against Facebook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antitrust subcommittee began investigating Big Tech last summer and questioned Mr. Zuckerberg at a hearing in July .
The committee ’ s subsequent report on its findings called on the FTC to take action against Big Tech and recommended a revival of antitrust enforcement from the federal government .
Alongside the antitrust scrutiny , Mr. Zuckerberg has also faced grillings in multiple Senate committee hearings focused on election-related content and the efficacy of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act .
Section 230 shields social media companies from legal liability for content posted @ @ @ @ @ @

For years we have been working to hold tech giants to account. We had to go back to the drawing board in our 2016 lawsuit against these social media giants because welacked standing’ despite Facebook’s relentless attacks on our pages. The basis of our suit was challenging Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) under the First Amendment, which provides immunity from lawsuits to Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, thereby permitting these social media giants to engage in government-sanctioned censorship and discriminatory business practices free from legal challenge.
Facebook and Google take in roughly half of all Internet ad revenue. According to the Wall Street Journal:
In the U.S., Alphabet Inc.’s Google drives 89% of internet search; 95% of young adults on the internet use a Facebook Inc. product; and Amazon.com Inc. now accounts for 75% of electronic book sales. Those firms that aren’t monopolists are duopolists: Google and Facebook absorbed 63% of online ad spending last year; Google and Apple Inc. provide 99% of mobile phone operating systems; while Apple and Microsoft Corp. supply 95% of desktop operating systems.
Ma Bell was broken up by the government, albeit for different reasons. But it can and must be done.
Breitbart:
AT&T has called for an “Internet Bill of Rights” and argued that Facebook and Google should also be subjected to rules that would prevent unfair censorship on their platforms. AT&T, one of the largest telecommunications companies, called for Congress to enact an “Internet Bill of Rights” which would subject Facebook, Google, and other content providers to rules that would prevent unfair censorship on Internet Service Providers (ISPs) such as Comcast or AT&T as well as content providers such as Facebook and Google. AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson wrote, “Congressional action is needed to establish an ‘Internet Bill of Rights’ that applies to all internet companies and guarantees neutrality, transparency, openness, non-discrimination and privacy protection for all internet users.” Stephenson posted the ad in the New York Times, Washington Post, and other national news outlets on Wednesday.
The US government has used anti-trust laws to break up monopolies. They ought to break up Facebook. Section 2 of the Sherman Act highlights particular results deemed anticompetitive by nature and prohibits actions that ‘shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations.’ Couldn’t the same be applied to information? The United States government took down Standard Oil, Alcoa, Northern Securities, the American Tobacco Company and many others without nearly the power that Facebook has.”
NRO:
Tech companies such as Google and Facebook are also utilities of sorts that provide essential services. They depend on the free use of public airwaves. Yet they are subject to little oversight; they simply make up their own rules as they go along. Antitrust laws prohibit one corporation from unfairly devouring its competition, capturing most of its market, and then price-gouging as it sees fit without fear of competition. Google has all but destroyed its search-engine competitors in the same manner that Facebook has driven out competing social media.
Clearly Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, Sergey Brin, Eric Schmidt, and Jeff Bezos are contemporary but far less enlightened or talented “robber barons.” So why are they not smeared, defamed, and reviled like the robber barons of yesteryear? Says NRO:
Why are huge tech companies seemingly exempt from the rules that older corporations must follow? First, their CEOs wisely cultivate the image of hipsters. The public sees them more as aging teenagers in T-shirts, turtlenecks, and flip-flops than as updated versions of J. P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, or other robber barons of the past. Second, the tech industry’s hierarchy is politically progressive. In brilliant marketing fashion, the Internet, laptops, tablets, and smartphones have meshed with the hip youth culture of music, television, the movies, universities, and fashion. Think Woodstock rather than Wall Street. Corporate spokesmen at companies such as Twitter and YouTube brag about their social awareness, especially on issues such as radical environmentalism, identity politics, and feminism. Given that the regulatory deep state is mostly a liberal enterprise, the tech industry is seen as an ally of federal bureaucrats and regulators. Think more of Hollywood, the media, and universities than Exxon, General Motors, Koch Industries, and Philip Morris.
The groovy t-shirt-turtleneck vibe may keep the great unwashed under their spell, but it’s the shared political ideology with the far left that keeps these corporate managers free from accountability.
[the_ad id=”110283″]
FTC and 48 states file antitrust lawsuits against ‘anticompetitive’ Facebook The Federal Trade Commission and 48 states and territories filed lawsuits against Facebook on Wednesday alleging that the company engaged in unlawful behavior to eliminate its competition in social networking. By: Ryan Lovelace, The Washington Times, December 9, 2020 The FTC wants a federal judge to grant an injunction that could require Facebook to divest its assets, Instagram and WhatsApp. “Facebook’s actions to entrench and maintain its monopoly deny consumers the benefits of competition,” said Ian Conner, director of the FTC’s bureau of competition, in a statement. “Our aim is to roll back Facebook’s anticompetitive conduct and restore competition so that innovation and free competition can thrive.” The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia argues that Facebook has enjoyed monopoly control for the personal social networking realm for much of the last decade. “Since toppling early rival Myspace and achieving monopoly power, Facebook has turned to playing defense through anticompetitive means,” the lawsuit said. “After identifying two significant competitive threats to its dominant position — Instagram and WhatsApp — Facebook moved to squelch those threats by buying the companies, reflecting CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s view, expressed in a 2008 email, that ‘it is better to buy than compete.’ “ The 48 states, excluding Alabama and South Dakota, also filed a lawsuit in federal court in D.C. arguing that Facebook illegally maintained monopoly power via a “buy-or-bury” strategy. “Facebook’s unlawfully maintained monopoly power gives it wide latitude to set the terms for how its users’ private information is collected, used, and protected,” the states said in the lawsuit. “In addition, because Facebook decides how and whether the content shared by users is displayed to other users, Facebook’s monopoly gives it significant control over how users engage with their closest connections and what content users see when they do.” Facebook did not immediately comment on the FTC’s litigation. The company’s stock tumbled more than 2% on Wednesday as news of the FTC’s litigation broke. Republican and Democratic lawmakers have also expressed an interest in cracking down on Big Tech and Wednesday’s litigation is the latest salvo against Facebook. The House Judiciary Committee’s antitrust subcommittee began investigating Big Tech last summer and questioned Mr. Zuckerberg at a hearing in July. The committee’s subsequent report on its findings called on the FTC to take action against Big Tech and recommended a revival of antitrust enforcement from the federal government. Alongside the antitrust scrutiny, Mr. Zuckerberg has also faced grillings in multiple Senate committee hearings focused on election-related content and the efficacy of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 shields social media companies from legal liability for content posted by users on their platforms.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-09--Arizona Joins 20 Other States In Texas Election Lawsuit With The Supreme Court

Have a tip we should know ?
Your anonymity is NEVER compromised .
The Truth Must be Told Please take @ @ @ @ @ .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they @ @ @ @ @ .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising @ @ @ @ @ us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts @ @ @ @ @ put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more @ @ @ @ @ reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can @ @ @ @ @ without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the @ @ @ @ @ .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative @ @ @ @ @ time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we @ @ @ @ @ in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .

Lines being drawn.
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1336814935427444736?s=20
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-09--20 STATES File Amicus Brief in Supreme Court In Support of Yexas Election Fraud Case

The Texas lawsuit alleges that election officials in the four states made voting protocol changes that were contrary to election laws set by the state legislatures , in violation of the Constitution .
AG Brnovich Leads 20-State Amicus Brief Supporting Kentucky AG ’ s Defense of State Laws in Federal Court Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced that Arizona led a 20-state amicus brief urging the Supreme Court of the United States ( SCOTUS ) to reverse a decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that prevented the Kentucky Attorney General from intervening to defend a state law after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the law through the appellate process .
“ Arizonans know first-hand how elected officials can fail to respect the law , ” said General Brnovich .
“ Attorneys General have a duty to ensure state laws receive a faithful defense regardless of the inaction of other government officials.
” The matter of strategic capitulation in litigation is not reserved to Kentucky .
The Arizona Attorney General ’ s Office , for example , has had to intervene in several important elections cases over the past year after the Arizona Secretary of State failed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prominent case , Brnovich v DNC , is now before SCOTUS .
The issue of whether an Attorney General can intervene in federal court to continue the defense of a challenged state law is an important component of our democratic system of governance .
Public officials are not empowered to repeal duly enacted state laws unilaterally .
Federal courts must permit Attorneys General to continue the defense of state law when others will not .
This rule respects the voters ’ ability to elect legislators separately from executive officials and preserves the checks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ process .
In the Kentucky case , the Attorney General defended the state law on behalf of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services ( CHFS ) .
The Secretary of CHFS is appointed by the Governor .
When the CHFS chose not to seek further review of a Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision , the Kentucky Attorney General moved to intervene in the case and continue defending the law .
However , the Sixth Circuit did not allow the Kentucky Attorney General to intervene .
The Kentucky Attorney General is asking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ general should be allowed to intervene to defend a state law , after a federal court of appeals invalidates it and no other state official will defend it .
Attorney General Brnovich was joined in the brief by Attorneys General representing the following states : Alabama , Alaska , Arkansas , Georgia , Indiana , Kansas , Louisiana , Mississippi , Missouri , Montana , Nebraska , Ohio , Oklahoma , South Carolina , South Dakota , Tennessee , Texas , Utah , and West Virginia .

Civil war ……..
The Texas lawsuit alleges that election officials in the four states made voting protocol changes that were contrary to election laws set by the state legislatures, in violation of the Constitution.
AG Brnovich Leads 20-State Amicus Brief Supporting Kentucky AG’s Defense of State Laws in Federal Court By Katie Connor, Prescott News, December 9, 2020 Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced that Arizona led a 20-state amicus brief urging the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to reverse a decision by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that prevented the Kentucky Attorney General from intervening to defend a state law after the state official named declined to continue defending the law through the appellate process. “Arizonans know first-hand how elected officials can fail to respect the law,” said General Brnovich. “Attorneys General have a duty to ensure state laws receive a faithful defense regardless of the inaction of other government officials.” The matter of strategic capitulation in litigation is not reserved to Kentucky. The Arizona Attorney General’s Office, for example, has had to intervene in several important elections cases over the past year after the Arizona Secretary of State failed to defend challenged laws. One such prominent case, Brnovich v DNC, is now before SCOTUS. The issue of whether an Attorney General can intervene in federal court to continue the defense of a challenged state law is an important component of our democratic system of governance. Public officials are not empowered to repeal duly enacted state laws unilaterally. Federal courts must permit Attorneys General to continue the defense of state law when others will not. This rule respects the voters’ ability to elect legislators separately from executive officials and preserves the checks balances within the state’s legislative process. [the_ad id=”110283″] In the Kentucky case, the Attorney General defended the state law on behalf of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS). The Secretary of CHFS is appointed by the Governor. When the CHFS chose not to seek further review of a Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the Kentucky Attorney General moved to intervene in the case and continue defending the law. However, the Sixth Circuit did not allow the Kentucky Attorney General to intervene. The Kentucky Attorney General is asking SCOTUS to consider whether a state attorney general should be allowed to intervene to defend a state law, after a federal court of appeals invalidates it and no other state official will defend it. Attorney General Brnovich was joined in the brief by Attorneys General representing the following states: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia. Copy of Amicus Brief.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-09--Arkansas AG Rutledge to join Texas motion to Supreme Court on election balloting, results

Seven states have now joined Texas lawsuit , arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state .
BREAKING : Missouri 's AG @ Eric_Schmitt says his state will join Texas and Arkansas in SCOTUS challenge to presidential results in PA , GA , WI and MI .
See more @ JustTheNews @ RealAmVoice here : https : //t.co/tWpcSDaOs8 pic.twitter.com/hZq1bFcY3D Arkansas AG Rutledge to join Texas motion to Supreme Court on election balloting , results “ The integrity of our elections is a critical part of our nation and it must be upheld ” – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joseph Weber , Just the News , December 9 , 2020 : Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge says she will join a motion filed in Texas asking the Supreme Court to invalidate the Nov. 3 election results in four key states , based on a constitutional argument .
“ After reviewing the motion filed by Texas in the U.S. Supreme Court , I have determined that I will support the motion in all legally appropriate manners , ” Rutledge , a Republican , tweeted late Tuesday .
“ The integrity of our elections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and it must be upheld.
” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton late Monday asked the country ’ s highest court to invalidate the Nov. 3 election results in Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – arguing officials in those four battleground states violated the Constitution by making changes to how ballots were cast and counted without legislative approval .
The Supreme Court as of Wednesday morning had yet to publicly say whether it will hear the case .
The court deciding to hear the case would be a huge victory for President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to get the courts to investigate voter fraud , state ’ s last-minute changes to voting laws and other issues , in hope of having the certification of the 2020 presidential race delayed or overturned .
Paxton ’ s suits asked the justices to issue a temporary restraining order preventing the states “ from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the Electoral College.
” The suit also argues that changes made by the state ’ s governors , secretaries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities , without any consent by the state legislatures .
The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
” “ I ’ m worried about the credibility of elections , not just right now , but I ’ m worried about the credibility of elections going forward , ” Paxton told Just the News on Tuesday afternoon in a phone interview .
“ I ’ m not making a fraud argument , I ’ m making an argument based on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which was that we know state law was changed by people other than the state legislature , which is the only constitutionally authorized changes that are allowed .
”

Seven states have now joined Texas lawsuit, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state.
Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota.
BREAKING: Missouri's AG @Eric_Schmitt says his state will join Texas and Arkansas in SCOTUS challenge to presidential results in PA, GA, WI and MI. See more @JustTheNews @RealAmVoice here: https://t.co/tWpcSDaOs8 pic.twitter.com/hZq1bFcY3D
Arkansas AG Rutledge to join Texas motion to Supreme Court on election balloting, results
“The integrity of our elections is a critical part of our nation and it must be upheld” – Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge.
By Joseph Weber, Just the News, December 9, 2020:
Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge says she will join a motion filed in Texas asking the Supreme Court to invalidate the Nov. 3 election results in four key states, based on a constitutional argument.
“After reviewing the motion filed by Texas in the U.S. Supreme Court, I have determined that I will support the motion in all legally appropriate manners,” Rutledge, a Republican, tweeted late Tuesday. “The integrity of our elections is a critical part of our nation and it must be upheld.”
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton late Monday asked the country’s highest court to invalidate the Nov. 3 election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – arguing officials in those four battleground states violated the Constitution by making changes to how ballots were cast and counted without legislative approval.
The Supreme Court as of Wednesday morning had yet to publicly say whether it will hear the case.
The court deciding to hear the case would be a huge victory for President Trump’s lawyers and others trying to get the courts to investigate voter fraud, state’s last-minute changes to voting laws and other issues, in hope of having the certification of the 2020 presidential race delayed or overturned.
Paxton’s suits asked the justices to issue a temporary restraining order preventing the states “from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the Electoral College.”
The suit also argues that changes made by the state’s governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”
“I’m worried about the credibility of elections, not just right now, but I’m worried about the credibility of elections going forward,” Paxton told Just the News on Tuesday afternoon in a phone interview. “I’m not making a fraud argument, I’m making an argument based on the Constitution. And what we know happened, which was that we know state law was changed by people other than the state legislature, which is the only constitutionally authorized changes that are allowed.”


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-09--Calif Democrat Rep. Swalwell Refuses To Explain Affair with Notorious Chinese Sex Spy

How much did the Chinese pay Swalwell to push the ‘ Russia !
Russia !
Russia !
’ hoax for years ?
How much cooch does that require ?
Rep. Eric Swalwell ) is refusing to say if he had sex with an accused Chinese spy who cozied up to a slew of US elected officials , including him , in a bid to infiltrate the US political system .
NYP : The 40-year-old congressman was among a group of Bay Area Democrats targeted by the honeytrap — also known as Christine Fang — who entered the US as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next four years wooing the lawmakers to get close to sensitive government intelligence , according to a report in Axios .
Swalwell , a member of the House Intelligence Committee , has cooperated with federal investigations into Fang , according to his spokesperson .
“ Rep .
Swalwell , long ago , provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago , and whom he hasn ’ t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI , ” Swalwell ’ s office told Axios .
“ To @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he will not participate in your story.
” And Swalwell ’ s office relied on the “ classified information ” line when Fox News ’ Tucker Carlson questioned them about whether the California Democrat engaged in sexual relations with Fang .
…… But while Swalwell said he has cut off all contacts with Fang , his father , Eric , and brother , Joshua , still have the honeytrap listed as a friend on their Facebook pages .
And she shared a 2016 post from Joshua that linked to a video of him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jr. , meanwile , questioned Swalwell ’ s seat on the House intelligence panel , saying the congressman should be considered a national security threat because he might have been compromised by his relationship with Fang .
“ We shouldn ’ t be surprised that the media being silent on this issue which is truly a national security threat while this man sits on the House Intelligence Committee , ” the president ’ s oldest son told Carlson .
Chinese Sex Spy Targeted Democrat Politicians , Raised Money For Eric Swalwell , Planted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sexual Relationships ’ Swalwell refuses to explain relationship with suspected Chinese spy accused of affairs with mayors Rep. Eric Swalwell , D-Calif. , is keeping quiet about his past relationship with a woman suspected of acting as a Chinese spy .
Axios reported that a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang targeted up-and-coming local politicians , including Swalwell .
Fang reportedly helped fundraise for Swalwell ’ s 2014 campaign and helped place at least one intern in his office .
In fact , a former intelligence official told Fox News the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ sleep with lesser-known members of Congress and staffers.
” Fang ’ s relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors turned sexual , according to Axios , with at least two incidents being caught by FBI surveillance .
When asked about the nature of Swalwell ’ s relationship with Fang , the Democratic congressman ’ s office declined to comment .
According to Axios , federal investigators gave Swalwell a defensive briefing in 2015 during which they alerted him to their concerns over Fang .
An intelligence official told the news outlet that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The congressman ’ s office told Axios that Swalwell “ long ago , provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago , and whom he hasn ’ t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI.
” Beyond that , however , his office would not discuss the story , citing concerns related to classified information .
An anonymous FBI official told the San Francisco Chronicle that “ Swalwell was completely cooperative and under no suspicion of wrongdoing.
” “ It was a defensive briefing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Information was obtained where we do a duty to warn … that he may be targeted by a foreign government.
” Fang also volunteered for the 2014 House bid of Rep. Ro Khanna , D-Calif. , and a 2013 fundraiser for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard , D-Hawaii .
Khanna ’ s office said the congressman saw Fang at several gatherings but had no further contact , while Gabbard ’ s office told the outlet she “ has no recollection of ever meeting or talking with [ Fang ] , nor any recollection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fundraiser.
” Fang reportedly left the U.S. in mid-2015 .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

How much did the Chinese pay Swalwell to push the ‘Russia! Russia! Russia!’ hoax for years? How much cooch does that require?
Rep. Eric Swalwell) is refusing to say if he had sex with an accused Chinese spy who cozied up to a slew of US elected officials, including him, in a bid to infiltrate the US political system.
Adam Schiff is unfit to lead the House Intelligence Committee and Eric Swalwell should be removed from the committee! https://t.co/3DP9jDPDUe — Jim Banks (@RepJimBanks) December 9, 2020
NYP: The 40-year-old congressman was among a group of Bay Area Democrats targeted by the honeytrap — also known as Christine Fang — who entered the US as a college student in 2011 and spent the next four years wooing the lawmakers to get close to sensitive government intelligence, according to a report in Axios. Swalwell, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, has cooperated with federal investigations into Fang, according to his spokesperson. “Rep. Swalwell, long ago, provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago, and whom he hasn’t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI,” Swalwell’s office told Axios. “To protect information that might be classified, he will not participate in your story.” And Swalwell’s office relied on the “classified information” line when Fox News’ Tucker Carlson questioned them about whether the California Democrat engaged in sexual relations with Fang. …… But while Swalwell said he has cut off all contacts with Fang, his father, Eric, and brother, Joshua, still have the honeytrap listed as a friend on their Facebook pages. And she shared a 2016 post from Joshua that linked to a video of him and his congressman brother. Donald Trump Jr., meanwile, questioned Swalwell’s seat on the House intelligence panel, saying the congressman should be considered a national security threat because he might have been compromised by his relationship with Fang. “We shouldn’t be surprised that the media being silent on this issue which is truly a national security threat while this man sits on the House Intelligence Committee,” the president’s oldest son told Carlson.
Chinese Sex Spy Targeted Democrat Politicians, Raised Money For Eric Swalwell, Planted Intern In His Office, ‘Using Sexual Relationships’
Swalwell refuses to explain relationship with suspected Chinese spy accused of affairs with mayors Bombshell report linked California Democrat with suspected spy By Ronn Blitzer | Fox News | December 9, 2020 | Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., is keeping quiet about his past relationship with a woman suspected of acting as a Chinese spy. Axios reported that a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang targeted up-and-coming local politicians, including Swalwell. Fang reportedly helped fundraise for Swalwell’s 2014 campaign and helped place at least one intern in his office. In fact, a former intelligence official told Fox News the Chinese for years have sent spies to “sleep with lesser-known members of Congress and staffers.” Fang’s relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors turned sexual, according to Axios, with at least two incidents being caught by FBI surveillance. When asked about the nature of Swalwell’s relationship with Fang, the Democratic congressman’s office declined to comment. According to Axios, federal investigators gave Swalwell a defensive briefing in 2015 during which they alerted him to their concerns over Fang. An intelligence official told the news outlet that Swalwell cut ties with her soon after. The congressman’s office told Axios that Swalwell “long ago, provided information about this person — whom he met more than eight years ago, and whom he hasn’t seen in nearly six years — to the FBI.” Beyond that, however, his office would not discuss the story, citing concerns related to classified information. [the_ad id=”110283″] An anonymous FBI official told the San Francisco Chronicle that “Swalwell was completely cooperative and under no suspicion of wrongdoing.” “It was a defensive briefing,” the official told the Chronicle. “Information was obtained where we do a duty to warn … that he may be targeted by a foreign government.” Fang also volunteered for the 2014 House bid of Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., and a 2013 fundraiser for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii. Khanna’s office said the congressman saw Fang at several gatherings but had no further contact, while Gabbard’s office told the outlet she “has no recollection of ever meeting or talking with [Fang], nor any recollection of her playing a major role at the fundraiser.” Fang reportedly left the U.S. in mid-2015.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-09--‘MAKE THEM PAY’: Mich. Democratic Rep. Cynthia Jones  STRIPPED OF POWER, PENDING FURTHER ACTION Afte

‘MAKE THEM PAY’: Mich. Democratic Rep. Cynthia Jones  STRIPPED OF POWER, PENDING FURTHER ACTION After She Threatens Trump Supporters

This belligerent moron disgraced herself at the Michigan election fraud hearings .
Johnson is a stunning indictment of the Democrat party of violence and treason .
Michigan Democratic State Rep. Cynthia Johnson threatened President Donald Trump ’ s supporters in a Facebook live video Tuesday , saying it is a warning message to those who support the president .
In the Facebook live video , Johnson said Trump supporters better be careful , calling on “ soldiers ” to “ make them ( Trump supporters ) pay.
” The video was over three minutes long .
Johnson took office on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ term ends on December 31 , 2020 .
“ So this is just a warning to you Trumpers .
Be careful , walk lightly , we ain ’ t playing with you .
Enough of the shenanigans .
Enough is enough .
And for those of you who are soldiers , you know how to do it .
Do it right , be in order , make them pay , ” Johnson says in the video “ I wish I could be talking to y ’ all in a private room , because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could , but we ’ re public so… , ” Johnson also said in the video .
( RELATED : Kentucky Democratic Rep .
Reportedly Arrested In Louisville Riots ) Johnson did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller when asked about the comments in her video .
Tags : democratic party donald trump michigan trump supporters The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

This belligerent moron disgraced herself at the Michigan election fraud hearings. Johnson is a stunning indictment of the Democrat party of violence and treason.
NEW: This Michigan State Representative has been stripped of her committee assignments and further disciplinary action is being looked into as the proper authorities conduct an investigationhttps://t.co/au6tkixWya https://t.co/A8N5WMXPhM — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 9, 2020
‘Make Them Pay’: Michigan Democratic State Rep. Cynthia Jones Threatens Trump Supporters By: Henry Rodgers, DC, December 09, 2020: Michigan Democratic State Rep. Cynthia Johnson threatened President Donald Trump’s supporters in a Facebook live video Tuesday, saying it is a warning message to those who support the president. In the Facebook live video, Johnson said Trump supporters better be careful, calling on “soldiers” to “make them (Trump supporters) pay.” The video was over three minutes long. Johnson took office on January 1, 2019. Her current term ends on December 31, 2020. “So this is just a warning to you Trumpers. Be careful, walk lightly, we ain’t playing with you. Enough of the shenanigans. Enough is enough. And for those of you who are soldiers, you know how to do it. Do it right, be in order, make them pay,” Johnson says in the video WATCH: THE FULL FACEBOOK LIVE: Cynthia A. Johnson was Live “I wish I could be talking to y’all in a private room, because, uh, I just wish I could, but we’re public so…,” Johnson also said in the video. (RELATED: Kentucky Democratic Rep. Reportedly Arrested In Louisville Riots) Johnson did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller when asked about the comments in her video.
Tags : democratic party donald trump michigan trump supporters
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-12-09--YouTube Announces They Will Be Censoring All Videos About 2020 Election Fraud

Owned by Google .
Not the actions of an honest broker of information , news and truth .
On the contrary , it ’ s the act of totalitarians .
On Wednesday , YouTube announced that it will begin removing any content alleging widespread voter fraud influenced the outcome of the 2020 US presidential election .
In the immediate aftermath of the November 3rd election , YouTube came under fire for allowing channels to publish videos making false claims about election results .
In one instance , One America News Network , a verified YouTube channel , published a video @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election .
At the time , YouTube defended its decision to let the video stand , saying in a statement , “ Like other companies , we ’ re allowing these videos because discussion of election results & the process of counting votes is allowed on YouTube.
” The company went on to say that content from “ authoritative news organizations ” were “ the most popular videos about the election.
” In its Wednesday blog , YouTube said that its decision to begin removing misleading election videos follows the US ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect.
” Starting Wednesday , YouTube will begin removing any new content that misleads viewers about the outcome of the 2020 election .
YouTube ’ s announcement follows a series of lawsuits placed by the Donald Trump campaign challenging the results of the election .
On Tuesday , the Supreme Court rejected a request to block certification of Pennsylvania ’ s election results , making it nearly impossible for Republicans to invalidate Joe Biden ’ s victory in court .
In the post , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surfaced over 200,000 election-related videos and were shown over 4.5 billion times .
The company said that it would update these panels Wednesday , linking to electoral college results provided by the Office of the Federal Register calling Biden the official president-elect .

Owned by Google. Not the actions of an honest broker of information, news and truth. On the contrary, it’s the act of totalitarians.
YouTube will now remove videos disputing Joe Biden’s election victory A month after the election By Makena Kelly, The Verge, Dec 9, 2020: Holy shit just got this email from YouTube. Starting today they will remove content about election fraud…even though there are court cases about election fraud going through the system at this very moment. Adios free speech. The bannings are coming. pic.twitter.com/UqlVOSAdR6 — Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) December 9, 2020 On Wednesday, YouTube announced that it will begin removing any content alleging widespread voter fraud influenced the outcome of the 2020 US presidential election. In the immediate aftermath of the November 3rd election, YouTube came under fire for allowing channels to publish videos making false claims about election results. In one instance, One America News Network, a verified YouTube channel, published a video declaring that “Trump won” the election. At the time, YouTube defended its decision to let the video stand, saying in a statement, “Like other companies, we’re allowing these videos because discussion of election results & the process of counting votes is allowed on YouTube.” The company went on to say that content from “authoritative news organizations” were “the most popular videos about the election.” In its Wednesday blog, YouTube said that its decision to begin removing misleading election videos follows the US’s safe harbor deadline and that “enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect.” Starting Wednesday, YouTube will begin removing any new content that misleads viewers about the outcome of the 2020 election. YouTube’s announcement follows a series of lawsuits placed by the Donald Trump campaign challenging the results of the election. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court rejected a request to block certification of Pennsylvania’s election results, making it nearly impossible for Republicans to invalidate Joe Biden’s victory in court. [the_ad id=”110283″] In the post, YouTube said its election information panels had surfaced over 200,000 election-related videos and were shown over 4.5 billion times. The company said that it would update these panels Wednesday, linking to electoral college results provided by the Office of the Federal Register calling Biden the official president-elect.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here