pamelagellerreport--2020-11-14--Pollster: It’s Curious How Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton In Every City…Except These Four.

Pollster : It ’ s Curious How Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton In Every City…Except These Four .
Until all the votes are counted and all the allegations of voter fraud are investigated , I think it ’ s too early to declare a winner in the 2020 race .
You keep fighting .
For now , the legal challenges are hitting snags in the courts .
Still , President Trump should keep fighting to the end .
We have dead people voting .
We have allegations of ballots being illegally backdated .
Everything should be looked at right now .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ millions feel that way .
The turnout numbers are odd in some states , like Wisconsin , which hit 89 percent .
Now , is that figure impossible ?
No .
Wall Street Journal ’ s Kimberley Strassel did the math , but it ’ s highly improbable given the turnout rates in the surrounding areas .
It would require 900,000 people showing up for same-day registrations .
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was blunter last Sunday , when he said , “ I think he would have to do a lot to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a left-wing power grab , financed by people like George Soros , deeply laid in at the local level , and , frankly , I think that it is a corrupt , stolen election.
” He was commenting on Biden ’ s call for unity .
Yet , he also gave a hat-tip to someone we have written about here : Democracy Institute ’ s Patrick Basham .
“ We believe these people are thieves , we believe the big city machines are corrupt , ” the former House Speaker said .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the most accurate pollster , he ’ s British , wrote in a British newspaper…that this clearly was a stolen election , that it is impossible to imagine that Biden outran Obama in some of these states.
” Indeed , Basham quoted Joseph Stalin ’ s remarks about elections , where the Soviet dictator mentioned something about how it ’ s not important who votes but how they are counted , which appears to ring “ eerily true ” with this race .
Basham has more in his piece in the Sunday Express @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data was again on the money regarding Democratic turnout , the shy Trump vote , and how the president ’ s law and order approach prevented catastrophic bleeding with suburban women voters .
Suburban white women and urban black males were the shy Trump voters of this year .
The president drew 10 million new supporters in 2020 .
He also took aim at the 2020 pollsters as a whole this cycle as well .
“ If you count the ballot fraud , most pollsters clearly failed .
If you don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failed on a spectacular scale , ” wrote Basham .
Yet , here ’ s where things get fishy in the 2020 race which he mentions at the end of his column .
He cites Richard Baris of Big Data Poll who noted something funny about Biden ’ s numbers in the cities , how it lagged behind Clinton ’ s numbers , but shot off to the moon in these four cities .
Just take a look at the states in which these cities are located as well : Recommended America Can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ How curious that , as Baris notes , “ Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years .
Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country , save for Milwaukee , Detroit , Atlanta and Philadelphia.
” Robert Barnes , the foremost election analyst , observes in these “ big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.
” Trump ’ s victories in Pennsylvania , Michigan , and Wisconsin were on target until , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counting was arbitrarily halted .
Miraculously , several hundred thousand votes – all for Biden – were mysteriously ‘ found ’ ; Trump ’ s real leads subsequently vanished .
The protracted , eventual outcome will determine the contemporary relevance of Stalin ’ s observation .
No matter who wins , most pollsters already have lost their credibility and influence .
Trump is still very much in ‘ Hail Mary ’ territory regarding pulling this out , but it ’ s no longer about this election .
It ’ s about the next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with these shenanigans this year , do you think they ’ ll stop ?
I think you all know the answer to that question .
You all know the kind of left-wing scum we ’ re dealing with here .

Curious? Or impossible?
Pollster: It’s Curious How Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton In Every City…Except These Four.
By: Matt Vespa, Nov 14, 2020:
Until all the votes are counted and all the allegations of voter fraud are investigated, I think it’s too early to declare a winner in the 2020 race. You keep fighting. For now, the legal challenges are hitting snags in the courts. Still, President Trump should keep fighting to the end. We have dead people voting. We have allegations of ballots being illegally backdated. Everything should be looked at right now.
Was this election stolen? Well, millions feel that way. The turnout numbers are odd in some states, like Wisconsin, which hit 89 percent. Now, is that figure impossible? No. Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel did the math, but it’s highly improbable given the turnout rates in the surrounding areas. It would require 900,000 people showing up for same-day registrations. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was blunter last Sunday, when he said, “I think he would have to do a lot to convince Republicans that this is anything except a left-wing power grab, financed by people like George Soros, deeply laid in at the local level, and, frankly, I think that it is a corrupt, stolen election.” He was commenting on Biden’s call for unity. Yet, he also gave a hat-tip to someone we have written about here: Democracy Institute’s Patrick Basham.
“We believe these people are thieves, we believe the big city machines are corrupt,” the former House Speaker said. “Interestingly Patrick Basham, who’s the most accurate pollster, he’s British, wrote in a British newspaper…that this clearly was a stolen election, that it is impossible to imagine that Biden outran Obama in some of these states.”
Indeed, Basham quoted Joseph Stalin’s remarks about elections, where the Soviet dictator mentioned something about how it’s not important who votes but how they are counted, which appears to ring “eerily true” with this race. Basham has more in his piece in the Sunday Express, where he first highlighted how his data was again on the money regarding Democratic turnout, the shy Trump vote, and how the president’s law and order approach prevented catastrophic bleeding with suburban women voters. Suburban white women and urban black males were the shy Trump voters of this year. The president drew 10 million new supporters in 2020. He also took aim at the 2020 pollsters as a whole this cycle as well.
“If you count the ballot fraud, most pollsters clearly failed. If you don’t include the fraudulent ballots, most pollsters failed on a spectacular scale,” wrote Basham. Yet, here’s where things get fishy in the 2020 race which he mentions at the end of his column. He cites Richard Baris of Big Data Poll who noted something funny about Biden’s numbers in the cities, how it lagged behind Clinton’s numbers, but shot off to the moon in these four cities. Just take a look at the states in which these cities are located as well:
Recommended
America Can Survive an Illegitimate Commander-in-Thief
Susan Stamper Brown
How curious that, as Baris notes, “Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”
Robert Barnes, the foremost election analyst, observes in these “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.”
Trump’s victories in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were on target until, in the middle of the night, counting was arbitrarily halted. Miraculously, several hundred thousand votes – all for Biden – were mysteriously ‘found’; Trump’s real leads subsequently vanished.
The protracted, eventual outcome will determine the contemporary relevance of Stalin’s observation. No matter who wins, most pollsters already have lost their credibility and influence.
Trump is still very much in ‘Hail Mary’ territory regarding pulling this out, but it’s no longer about this election. It’s about the next one. If Democrats can get away with these shenanigans this year, do you think they’ll stop?
I think you all know the answer to that question. You all know the kind of left-wing scum we’re dealing with here.


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-14--Video: USPS Employee Told to Mark All Non-Biden Political Mail as ‘Undeliverable’ US Mail

A new U.S .
Postal Service ( USPS ) employee came forward asserting mail carriers were instructed to deliver mail only for Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden and mark the remainder “ undeliverable ” after November 9 .
Video : USPS employee allegedly told to mark all non-Biden political mail as ‘ undeliverable ’ US Mail A new U.S .
Postal Service ( USPS ) employee came forward asserting mail carriers were instructed to deliver mail only for Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden and mark the remainder “ undeliverable ” after November 9 .
In a video shared on Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Keefe , the whistleblower from Elkins Park , Pa. , told O ’ Keefe that the instructions meant other political mail was “ garbage.
” “ You [ mail carriers ] were told that the only political mail that will be delivered from now on will be that of the ‘ winner , ’ in this case , Joe Biden , ” the whistleblower told O ’ Keefe .
“ And that other political mail from other sources and senders would be put into the undeliverable bulk business mail bin or UVM.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be continued to be treated as first-class and delivered the day it was received , ” the whistleblower added .
When asked what happens to undeliverable bulk business mail , the whistleblower said , “ I believe it goes back to the plant , but undeliverable bulk business mail is essentially a step away from the garbage.
” This isn ’ t the first report of whistleblowers coming forward revealing voter fraud or suppression in Pennsylvania during 2020 elections .
In another case , a mail carrier from Pennsylvania said in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collect and submit late ballots , which supervisors then backdated to appear as though they were mailed in time for Election Day .
Richard Hopkins from Erie , Pa. , said he overheard a supervisor discussing a plan to backdate ballots , advising letter carriers to pick up ballots through Friday .
Pennsylvania ’ s current rules require ballots to have been mailed by Election Day , but they could still be delivered to officials and counted through the following Friday , The Washington Times reported .
Senator Lindsey Graham , a South @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , released the affidavit provided to the Trump campaign , vowing to thoroughly investigate any credible claims of voting irregularities and misconduct in order to ensure the integrity of the 2020 elections , adding that he wouldn ’ t allow them to be “ swept under the rug.
” “ Mr .
Hopkins is entitled to all whistleblower protections , and I will ensure they extend to other postal workers who may come forward with claims of irregulates , misconduct , fraud , etc.
, ” Graham said in a statement .
Disruptions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Day confusion propelled the Trump campaign to file multiple lawsuits in key swing states alleging voter fraud and suppression .

A new U.S. Postal Service (USPS) employee came forward asserting mail carriers were instructed to deliver mail only for Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden and mark the remainder “undeliverable” after November 9.
Video: USPS employee allegedly told to mark all non-Biden political mail as ‘undeliverable’
US Mail
By: Liz George, American Military News, November 13, 2020:
A new U.S. Postal Service (USPS) employee came forward asserting mail carriers were instructed to deliver mail only for Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden and mark the remainder “undeliverable” after November 9.
In a video shared on Twitter by Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe, the whistleblower from Elkins Park, Pa., told O’Keefe that the instructions meant other political mail was “garbage.”
“You [mail carriers] were told that the only political mail that will be delivered from now on will be that of the ‘winner,’ in this case, Joe Biden,” the whistleblower told O’Keefe. “And that other political mail from other sources and senders would be put into the undeliverable bulk business mail bin or UVM.”
“All political mail for Biden was to be continued to be treated as first-class and delivered the day it was received,” the whistleblower added.
When asked what happens to undeliverable bulk business mail, the whistleblower said, “I believe it goes back to the plant, but undeliverable bulk business mail is essentially a step away from the garbage.”
BREAKING: New @USPS Whistleblower in Philadelphia suburb Elkins Park Details Orders To Stop Delivering @realDonaldTrump And Republican Mailings “Told that the only mail that will be delivered from now(Nov 9) on will be for that of the winner…this case @JoeBiden” #ExposeUSPS pic.twitter.com/aEV73IcpHd — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) November 12, 2020
This isn’t the first report of whistleblowers coming forward revealing voter fraud or suppression in Pennsylvania during 2020 elections. In another case, a mail carrier from Pennsylvania said in a sworn affidavit that supervisors ordered him to collect and submit late ballots, which supervisors then backdated to appear as though they were mailed in time for Election Day.
Richard Hopkins from Erie, Pa., said he overheard a supervisor discussing a plan to backdate ballots, advising letter carriers to pick up ballots through Friday. Pennsylvania’s current rules require ballots to have been mailed by Election Day, but they could still be delivered to officials and counted through the following Friday, The Washington Times reported.
Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, released the affidavit provided to the Trump campaign, vowing to thoroughly investigate any credible claims of voting irregularities and misconduct in order to ensure the integrity of the 2020 elections, adding that he wouldn’t allow them to be “swept under the rug.”
“Mr. Hopkins is entitled to all whistleblower protections, and I will ensure they extend to other postal workers who may come forward with claims of irregulates, misconduct, fraud, etc.,” Graham said in a statement.
Disruptions in vote counts leading to widespread Election Day confusion propelled the Trump campaign to file multiple lawsuits in key swing states alleging voter fraud and suppression.


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-14--Pennsylvania Mail-In Ballot Snafu Is Ripe For The U.S. Supreme Court To Intervene

The Supreme Court will likely weigh in on Pennsylvania ’ s handling of mail-in ballots , and despite the pundits ’ claims to the contrary , serious constitutional issues are at stake .
An exclusive interview establishes the Pennsylvania vote has major constitutional problems .
Joe Kantz , the chairman of the Snyder County Commission and the chairman of the Board of Elections for more than 10 years , spoke with me yesterday about the last-minute changes the Pennsylvania secretary for elections and commissions issued .
As detailed below , those changes strongly suggest that the electorally rich state the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have violated the Equal Protection Clause and Article II , Section 1 , Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution .
On election morning , as his team began pre-canvass activities , an out-of-state Democratic poll watcher pressured Kantz to provide him identification numbers for voters who had failed to include their ballots in the internal secrecy sleeve required by Pennsylvania law .
These so-called naked ballots are invalid under Pennsylvania law .
This gentleman pushed Kantz several times for this information , referencing an email from Jonathan Marks , the deputy secretary for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me the email , which I had not yet seen , ” Kantz told me .
Kantz ’ s election director then checked her email and discovered the 8:38 p.m. Monday email from Marks .
Marks ’ last-minute email noted that county boards of elections had asked whether they could provide representatives of candidates or political parties information about voters whose absentee and mail-in ballots had been rejected .
Marks advised that the county board of elections should provide this information to party and candidate representatives during the pre-canvass .
“ I consulted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Kantz told me .
He apparently spoke with attorneys for other counties before advising that he did not believe the Pennsylvania election code provided for the sharing of voter identification information with third parties .
Snyder County , which is nestled in the middle of Pennsylvania under the shadow of the Appalachian Mountain range , leans heavily Republican , with the unofficial results showing the Donald Trump-Mike Pence ticket received 13,816 votes to Biden-Harris ’ s 4,848 .
“ About 60 ballots failed to include the inner sleeve as required by Pennsylvania @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Kantz told me .
“ Approximately 25 additional voters had failed to sign the outer envelope , ” another mandate of Pennsylvania law .
With more than 47,000 votes separating Biden and Trump in the statewide tallies , those 80-plus ballots in the small Snyder County won ’ t change the outcome in Pennsylvania .
What might change the outcome , however , is the different treatment voters with invalid ballots received in larger , heavily Democratic areas , such as Philadelphia County , which recorded a whopping 575,975 votes for Biden-Harris @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with more than 56 percent of Biden voters using mail-in voting .
According to a complaint filed on Monday on behalf of Trump , Philadelphia County allowed voters it had determined had submitted naked ballots to remedy the defect , and further alleged that to figure out which voters should be notified of their error , Philadelphia County inspected mail-in ballots before Election Day in plain violation of state law .
Specifically , Section 13808 ( g ) ( 1.1 ) of the election code provides that “ no earlier than seven o @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” the county board of elections shall meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots received to that meeting.
” At that meeting , “ the election officials shall inspect and open the envelopes of all absentee and mail-in ballots , remove such ballots from such envelopes , and count , compute and tally the votes reflected on such ballots , ” 25 P.S .
§3146.8 ( 1.1 ) .
Trump ’ s complaint charged that Philadelphia County officials inspected the ballots in a variety of ways to determine if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example , by feeling the envelope , holding it up to a light , or weighing it through sorting machines .
Trump ’ s allegations find support in an election update published by Election Protection .
Election Protection , also known as 866-Our-Vote , “ was founded in 2004 by a coalition of major left-leaning advocacy organizations , ” and now partners with an array of leftist groups , including the National Education Association , Service Employees International Union , American Federation of Teachers , Sierra Club , Southern Poverty Law Center @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American Way , and the Al Sharpton group , National Action Network .
In the days before the 2020 election , Election Protection issued various updates , including one on Oct. 30 , 2020 , which noted that voters in Pennsylvania might start getting emails that their ballots were rejected because voters had failed to sign the outside envelope or that it was weighed and determined to be a naked ballot .
The Election Protection update continued : In bolded language , highlighted in yellow , Election Protection then advised that the best @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to visit a polling place on Election Day to re-vote , adding that the Department of State had recently clarified that such votes would be counted so long as the voter was eligible to vote .
Trump ’ s complaint alleged that this approach is exactly what happened in the defendant counties , which included Allegheny , Centre , Chester , Delaware , Montgomery , Northampton , and Philadelphia counties .
Those counties ’ boards of election , according to the complaint , allowed voters to fix their defective mail-in ballots , while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counties of Lancaster , York , Westmoreland , and Berks counties , did not contact voters who had submitted naked ballots , nor allow them a chance to re-vote .
When asked whether his election workers had attempted to determine if there were naked ballots inside the mail-in ballots before election day , Kantz told me , “ No .
State law prohibits pre-canvassing of ballots until Election Day , ” so his staff could not attempt to decipher whether the ballots inside lacked the inner security sleeve .
“ We did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we opened the outer envelope on Election Day , ” Kantz explained .
As noted above , Kantz also refused to provide third-party poll watchers with identification numbers for voters whose ballots lacked a signature or an interior secrecy sleeve .
While Pennsylvania ’ s Department of State had provided guidance that such voter information should be shared with candidates or party representatives , that guidance conflicts with the election code provisions governing canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots .
“ No person observing , attending or participating in a pre-canvass meeting may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any pre-canvass meeting prior to the close of the polls , ” 25 P.S .
§ 3146.8 ( g ) ( 1.1 ) provides .
Yet the Democratic strongholds were doing just that , according to Trump ’ s complaint .
Further , as this social media post reveals , Democrats appeared prepared for the Department of State ’ s last-minute announcement , seeking workers to contact voters on Election Day .
Significantly , the post noted that training would occur on Nov. 2 at 2:30 p.m. and foresaw that on Election Day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about rejected ballots.
” ( The Department of State ’ s email to county election officials directing them to provide information concerning voters with rejected ballots to party and candidate representatives was not dispatched until after 8:00 p.m. on Nov .
2 . )
Workers would then be dispatched to the voters ’ homes and tell them they needed to re-vote .
This solicitation directed interested applicants to contact Sisneros Strategies , which promotes itself as helping “ campaigns , progressive and pro-labor candidates and organizations , ballot initiatives , state caucuses , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their voter contact goals.
” These facts , when read in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore , provide strong support for aspects of Trump ’ s lawsuit .
As Andrew McCarthy concisely summarized : Here , revisiting the Court ’ s reasoning in Bush v. Gore is helpful to consider how that precedent applies to the Pennsylvania situation .
The majority in Bush v. Gore held that the varying standards violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution , reasoning : “ The right to vote is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the franchise .
Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise .
Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms , the State may not , by later arbitrary and disparate treatment , value one person ’ s vote over that of another.
” Yet that is exactly what happened to Pennsylvania voters in at least two ways .
First , only voters in larger counties with access to “ Bluecrest sorting equipment ” could benefit from the pre-canvass sorting of ballots to determine which votes would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sleeve .
Second , there was disparate treatment between residents in counties that inspected the ballots pre-canvass and then provided third parties the voters ’ information , and those that did not .
Under Bush v. Gore , this seems a clear violation of the Equal Protection Clause .
The situation in Pennsylvania brings up another constitutional concern , one raised in the three-justice concurrence authored by then-Justice William Rehnquist and joined by former Justice Antonin Scalia and current Justice Clarence Thomas .
In his concurrence , Rehnquist focused not on the Equal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Section 1 , Clause 2 , of the U.S. Constitution , which provides , “ Each state shall appoint , in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct , a number of electors , equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.
” The Bush v. Gore concurrence then explained that Article II , Section 1 , Clause 2 of the Constitution “ convey [ s ] the broadest power of determination ” and “ leaves it to the legislature exclusively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of electors .
And “ a significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question.
” The three-justice concurrence then explained how the Florida Supreme Court ’ s decision conflicted with the legislative mandate in violation of Article II .
In Pennsylvania , it was the Department of State , not the state courts , that significantly departed from the legislative scheme by , among other things , allowing the inspection of ballots before the day of the election and by permitting voter-information to be shared before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Day .
The Trump team presents several other examples of violations of the election code , for instance , related to the curing of mail-in ballots and the failure to verify signatures .
How these arguments will play out is anyone ’ s guess , given the new makeup of the Supreme Court , but as the concurrence stressed : “ We deal here not with an ordinary election , but with an election for the President of the United States .
The importance of his election and the vital character of its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and safety of the whole people can not be too strongly stated.
” This reality will likely force the Supreme Court to weigh in on Pennsylvania ’ s handling of the mail-in ballots under both the Equal Protection Clause and Article II .
Notwithstanding pundits ’ claims to the contrary , serious constitutional issues are at stake .

The Supreme Court will likely weigh in on Pennsylvania’s handling of mail-in ballots, and despite the pundits’ claims to the contrary, serious constitutional issues are at stake.
By Margot Cleveland, The Federalist, November 12, 2020
An exclusive interview establishes the Pennsylvania vote has major constitutional problems. Joe Kantz, the chairman of the Snyder County Commission and the chairman of the Board of Elections for more than 10 years, spoke with me yesterday about the last-minute changes the Pennsylvania secretary for elections and commissions issued. As detailed below, those changes strongly suggest that the electorally rich state the media has called for Joe Biden might have violated the Equal Protection Clause and Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
On election morning, as his team began pre-canvass activities, an out-of-state Democratic poll watcher pressured Kantz to provide him identification numbers for voters who had failed to include their ballots in the internal secrecy sleeve required by Pennsylvania law. These so-called naked ballots are invalid under Pennsylvania law.
This gentleman pushed Kantz several times for this information, referencing an email from Jonathan Marks, the deputy secretary for elections and commissions. “He showed me the email, which I had not yet seen,” Kantz told me. Kantz’s election director then checked her email and discovered the 8:38 p.m. Monday email from Marks.
Marks’ last-minute email noted that county boards of elections had asked whether they could provide representatives of candidates or political parties information about voters whose absentee and mail-in ballots had been rejected. Marks advised that the county board of elections should provide this information to party and candidate representatives during the pre-canvass.
“I consulted with our solicitor concerning the directive,” Kantz told me. He apparently spoke with attorneys for other counties before advising that he did not believe the Pennsylvania election code provided for the sharing of voter identification information with third parties.
Snyder County, which is nestled in the middle of Pennsylvania under the shadow of the Appalachian Mountain range, leans heavily Republican, with the unofficial results showing the Donald Trump-Mike Pence ticket received 13,816 votes to Biden-Harris’s 4,848. “About 60 ballots failed to include the inner sleeve as required by Pennsylvania law, rendering the votes invalid,” Kantz told me. “Approximately 25 additional voters had failed to sign the outer envelope,” another mandate of Pennsylvania law.
With more than 47,000 votes separating Biden and Trump in the statewide tallies, those 80-plus ballots in the small Snyder County won’t change the outcome in Pennsylvania. What might change the outcome, however, is the different treatment voters with invalid ballots received in larger, heavily Democratic areas, such as Philadelphia County, which recorded a whopping 575,975 votes for Biden-Harris compared to Trump’s 128,308, with more than 56 percent of Biden voters using mail-in voting.
According to a complaint filed on Monday on behalf of Trump, Philadelphia County allowed voters it had determined had submitted naked ballots to remedy the defect, and further alleged that to figure out which voters should be notified of their error, Philadelphia County inspected mail-in ballots before Election Day in plain violation of state law.
Specifically, Section 13808(g)(1.1) of the election code provides that “no earlier than seven o’clock A.M. on election day,” the county board of elections shall meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots received to that meeting.” At that meeting, “the election officials shall inspect and open the envelopes of all absentee and mail-in ballots, remove such ballots from such envelopes, and count, compute and tally the votes reflected on such ballots,” 25 P.S. §3146.8(1.1).
Details of the Trump Complaint
Trump’s complaint charged that Philadelphia County officials inspected the ballots in a variety of ways to determine if they were missing an inner-secrecy envelope, for example, by feeling the envelope, holding it up to a light, or weighing it through sorting machines.
Trump’s allegations find support in an election update published by Election Protection. Election Protection, also known as 866-Our-Vote, “was founded in 2004 by a coalition of major left-leaning advocacy organizations,” and now partners with an array of leftist groups, including the National Education Association, Service Employees International Union, American Federation of Teachers, Sierra Club, Southern Poverty Law Center, Common Cause, People for the American Way, and the Al Sharpton group, National Action Network.
In the days before the 2020 election, Election Protection issued various updates, including one on Oct. 30, 2020, which noted that voters in Pennsylvania might start getting emails that their ballots were rejected because voters had failed to sign the outside envelope or that it was weighed and determined to be a naked ballot. The Election Protection update continued:
Counties have had varying ability to identify and set aside returned absentee and mail-in ballots lacking the secrecy envelope and/or a signature on the declaration envelope. Larger counties with more sophisticated equipment could automate this process, but smaller county offices would have to do this by hand. While the absence of a signature is plainly knowable, determining whether or not a ballot is properly enclosed in the secrecy envelope may not be straightforward. The Bluecrest sorting equipment used in Philadelphia and several other large [areas] is able to detect naked ballots by the thickness and/or weight of the returned ballot.
In bolded language, highlighted in yellow, Election Protection then advised that the best option for citizens under these circumstances was to visit a polling place on Election Day to re-vote, adding that the Department of State had recently clarified that such votes would be counted so long as the voter was eligible to vote.
Trump’s complaint alleged that this approach is exactly what happened in the defendant counties, which included Allegheny, Centre, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Northampton, and Philadelphia counties. Those counties’ boards of election, according to the complaint, allowed voters to fix their defective mail-in ballots, while other counties, such as the Republican-heavy counties of Lancaster, York, Westmoreland, and Berks counties, did not contact voters who had submitted naked ballots, nor allow them a chance to re-vote.
Discrepancies Between Red and Blue Counties
When asked whether his election workers had attempted to determine if there were naked ballots inside the mail-in ballots before election day, Kantz told me, “No. State law prohibits pre-canvassing of ballots until Election Day,” so his staff could not attempt to decipher whether the ballots inside lacked the inner security sleeve.
“We did not know if a ballot was naked until we opened the outer envelope on Election Day,” Kantz explained. As noted above, Kantz also refused to provide third-party poll watchers with identification numbers for voters whose ballots lacked a signature or an interior secrecy sleeve.
While Pennsylvania’s Department of State had provided guidance that such voter information should be shared with candidates or party representatives, that guidance conflicts with the election code provisions governing canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots. “No person observing, attending or participating in a pre-canvass meeting may disclose the results of any portion of any pre-canvass meeting prior to the close of the polls,” 25 P.S. § 3146.8(g)(1.1) provides.
Yet the Democratic strongholds were doing just that, according to Trump’s complaint. Further, as this social media post reveals, Democrats appeared prepared for the Department of State’s last-minute announcement, seeking workers to contact voters on Election Day.
Significantly, the post noted that training would occur on Nov. 2 at 2:30 p.m. and foresaw that on Election Day, the campaign would receive “information about rejected ballots.” (The Department of State’s email to county election officials directing them to provide information concerning voters with rejected ballots to party and candidate representatives was not dispatched until after 8:00 p.m. on Nov. 2.) Workers would then be dispatched to the voters’ homes and tell them they needed to re-vote.
This solicitation directed interested applicants to contact Sisneros Strategies, which promotes itself as helping “campaigns, progressive and pro-labor candidates and organizations, ballot initiatives, state caucuses, state parties, and nonprofit organizations achieve their voter contact goals.”
A Look Back at Bush v. Gore
These facts, when read in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore, provide strong support for aspects of Trump’s lawsuit. As Andrew McCarthy concisely summarized:
In that famous 2000 election case, the Supreme Court called a halt to the recount process ordered by the state supreme court in Florida. The 5–4 majority found that the state court’s rulings, as they were being executed by the counties in question, had resulted in widely disparate treatment of voters during the canvassing of ballots across counties — and sometimes within the same county. The Court reasoned that disparate treatment that has the effect of canceling or diluting the votes of some voters, or that privileges some voters but not others, is unconstitutional.
Here, revisiting the Court’s reasoning in Bush v. Gore is helpful to consider how that precedent applies to the Pennsylvania situation. The majority in Bush v. Gore held that the varying standards violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, reasoning: “The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise. Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.”
Yet that is exactly what happened to Pennsylvania voters in at least two ways. First, only voters in larger counties with access to “Bluecrest sorting equipment” could benefit from the pre-canvass sorting of ballots to determine which votes would be canceled because of a missing secrecy sleeve. Second, there was disparate treatment between residents in counties that inspected the ballots pre-canvass and then provided third parties the voters’ information, and those that did not. Under Bush v. Gore, this seems a clear violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
The situation in Pennsylvania brings up another constitutional concern, one raised in the three-justice concurrence authored by then-Justice William Rehnquist and joined by former Justice Antonin Scalia and current Justice Clarence Thomas. In his concurrence, Rehnquist focused not on the Equal Protection Clause but on Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, of the U.S. Constitution, which provides, “Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”
The Bush v. Gore concurrence then explained that Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution “convey[s] the broadest power of determination” and “leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method” of appointment of electors. And “a significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question.” The three-justice concurrence then explained how the Florida Supreme Court’s decision conflicted with the legislative mandate in violation of Article II.
In Pennsylvania, it was the Department of State, not the state courts, that significantly departed from the legislative scheme by, among other things, allowing the inspection of ballots before the day of the election and by permitting voter-information to be shared before the close of the polls on Election Day. The Trump team presents several other examples of violations of the election code, for instance, related to the curing of mail-in ballots and the failure to verify signatures.
How these arguments will play out is anyone’s guess, given the new makeup of the Supreme Court, but as the concurrence stressed: “We deal here not with an ordinary election, but with an election for the President of the United States. The importance of his election and the vital character of its relationship to and effect upon the welfare and safety of the whole people cannot be too strongly stated.”
This reality will likely force the Supreme Court to weigh in on Pennsylvania’s handling of the mail-in ballots under both the Equal Protection Clause and Article II. Notwithstanding pundits’ claims to the contrary, serious constitutional issues are at stake.


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-15--WATCH: BLM Attacks Pro-Trump Black Woman Pushing Stroller after D.C. Rally

Black Lives Matter protesters harassed a black woman wearing a Trump jacket and pushing a stroller through BLM Plaza .
The attack led to a fight and left two little girls in tears .
A group of anti-Trump protesters began harassing a black woman wearing pro-Trump clothing while she pushed a baby stroller through Black Lives Matter Plaza near the White House on Saturday .
The family had just left the Million MAGA March .
A video tweeted by Daily Caller journalist Shelby Talcott shows the woman and her young daughter walking down a street in Washington , DC , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the right can be seen taking cell phone pictures of the family .
“ Get the f**k away from my family , ” the mother says as others begin to crowd around her .
The mother continues yelling as a man and a woman approach her family from behind .
A man with a Don ’ t Tread on Me flag steps in and attempts to intervene in the conflict , the video shows .
The woman attempts to steal the flag from the man and a fight breaks out .
Another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BLM protesters put the family in .
During the fight , the man with the flag is pushed backward and falls on a young girl .
D.C. Metro police officers quickly moved in from where they had been observing the situation develop and attempted to separate the group .
As the fight develops , the mother moves her kids to a safe position and yells at police to arrest the woman involved .
Police can be seen placing a man in handcuffs who started throwing punches at the man with the flag .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ screaming in terror as they watched the scene unfold .
In a video showing the aftermath , a man wearing a “ F**k Racism ” shirt yells at the Black woman , “ Why did you bring your kid here ?
” The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Awful.
WATCH: BLM Attacks Pro-Trump Black Woman Pushing Stroller after D.C. Rally By Breitbart, November 14, 2020 Black Lives Matter protesters harassed a black woman wearing a Trump jacket and pushing a stroller through BLM Plaza. The attack led to a fight and left two little girls in tears. A group of anti-Trump protesters began harassing a black woman wearing pro-Trump clothing while she pushed a baby stroller through Black Lives Matter Plaza near the White House on Saturday. The family had just left the Million MAGA March.
Police in riot gear face towards the black bloc counter-protesters — and there’s a fence barricade keeping the pro-Trump group back pic.twitter.com/F3PEZOzCLu — Shelby Talcott (@ShelbyTalcott) November 14, 2020
A video tweeted by Daily Caller journalist Shelby Talcott shows the woman and her young daughter walking down a street in Washington, DC, pushing a baby stroller. A woman to the right can be seen taking cell phone pictures of the family. “Get the f**k away from my family,” the mother says as others begin to crowd around her. The mother continues yelling as a man and a woman approach her family from behind. A man with a Don’t Tread on Me flag steps in and attempts to intervene in the conflict, the video shows. The woman attempts to steal the flag from the man and a fight breaks out. Another Daily Caller video shows the danger the BLM protesters put the family in. During the fight, the man with the flag is pushed backward and falls on a young girl.
Fight breaks out on BLM Plaza between a family supporting Trump and pro-BLM supporters moments ago. DC police trying to calm the situation and separate groups. Sad scene , children are crying and very scared. pic.twitter.com/tWHta2iZFq — Jorge Ventura Media (@VenturaReport) November 14, 2020
D.C. Metro police officers quickly moved in from where they had been observing the situation develop and attempted to separate the group. As the fight develops, the mother moves her kids to a safe position and yells at police to arrest the woman involved. Police can be seen placing a man in handcuffs who started throwing punches at the man with the flag. The videos end showing the pre-teen girls screaming in terror as they watched the scene unfold. In a video showing the aftermath, a man wearing a “F**k Racism” shirt yells at the Black woman, “Why did you bring your kid here?”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-16--Report: President Trump Was Just Called Into “Emergency” White House Meeting With His “Election Lega

Report: President Trump Was Just Called Into “Emergency” White House Meeting With His “Election Legal Team”

Pray for President Trump .
Pray for America .
Our way of life is on the line .
We must win .
Report : Trump Was Just Called Into “ Emergency ” White House Meeting With His “ Election Legal Team ” NJ Senate candidate Tricia Flanagan just sent out a tweet that has set social media ablaze As the legal experts on Trump ’ s team ramp up their appearances on TV , discussing the latest moves they plan to make , many are sensing that a big legal hammer is about to drop soon .
Ms. Flanagan gave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which suggests that President Trump was just called into an “ emergency ” White House meeting with his legal team .
Here ’ s what she said : “ BREAKING—Pres Trump has been called to an emergency meeting at the White House with his legal team .
Massive legal filing imminent.
” The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Pray for President Trump. Pray for America. Our way of life is on the line. We must win.
The Radical Left Democrats, working with their partner, the Fake News Media, are trying to STEAL this Election. We won’t let them! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 16, 2020
Report: Trump Was Just Called Into “Emergency” White House Meeting With His “Election Legal Team” By Wayne Dupree, November 16, 2020 NJ Senate candidate Tricia Flanagan just sent out a tweet that has set social media ablaze MORE FROM WAYNE DUPREE As the legal experts on Trump’s team ramp up their appearances on TV, discussing the latest moves they plan to make, many are sensing that a big legal hammer is about to drop soon. Ms. Flanagan gave relevance to those claims with her tweet, which suggests that President Trump was just called into an “emergency” White House meeting with his legal team. Here’s what she said: “BREAKING—Pres Trump has been called to an emergency meeting at the White House with his legal team. Massive legal filing imminent.”
https://twitter.com/NewDayForNJ/status/1328430023955656704?s=20
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-16--FEDERAL Lawsuit Filed Challenging Michigan Election

GR readers are very familiar with AFLC American Freedom Law Center has been my law firm for over a decade handling scores of our First Amendment lawsuits and WINNING them .
Late yesterday , the American Freedom Law Center , along with associated counsel acting as special counsel for the Thomas More Society based in Chicago , filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan , challenging the conduct of the 2020 general election in Michigan on behalf of two Michigan voters .
The lawsuit sets forth numerous allegations of election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and throughout Wayne County , the most populous county in the State , and it demonstrates that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson ’ s “ vote by mail ” scheme violated the U.S. Constitution by directly violating the absentee ballot law passed by the legislature , thereby precipitating fraud at the TCF Center and throughout the State .
As alleged in the lawsuit : “ In Michigan , the Secretary of State , Jocelyn Benson , a registered Democrat , acting unilaterally and without legislative approval , flooded the electoral process for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This was accomplished by the Secretary of State ’ s unilateral decision to send absentee ballot request forms to every household in Michigan with a registered voter ( regardless of whether the voter was still alive or actually resided at that address ) and to non-registered voters who were temporarily living in the State .
Furthermore , the Secretary of State permitted online requests for absentee ballots without signature verification , thereby allowing for fraud in the process of obtaining an absentee ballot .
These actions were not approved or authorized by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason .
Predictably , this flood of unauthorized , absentee ballots ensured the dilution of lawful votes and precipitated an unfair and dishonest 2020 general election , as the evidence adduced from the TCF Center in Detroit , Michigan proves.
” The lawsuit names as defendants Jocelyn Benson in her official capacity as Secretary of State and Jeannette Bradshaw in her official capacity as Chair of the Board of State Canvassers for Michigan .
“ Fair and honest elections are the lifeblood of our constitutional republic .
American citizens , including those of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and deserve honest , fair , and transparent elections .
We demand and deserve a process that ensures that our legal votes will count and that illegal votes will not .
The Constitution requires it , and for good reason , as our lawsuit demonstrates .
Indeed , the evidence shows that the election in Michigan was not honest , fair , and transparent .
Consequently , we are asking a federal court to do something about it .
At the end of the day , this case seeks to restore the purity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ‘ We the people ’ can have confidence in their outcome and thus confidence that those who govern are doing so legitimately.
” The lawsuit alleges violation of the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , both of which protect a private citizen ’ s legal vote from being debased or diluted by arbitrary and disparate treatment , such as permitting illegal votes that discount proper votes .
As stated by the U.S. Supreme Court , “ Every voter in a federal .
.
.
election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with little chance of winning or for one with little chance of losing , has a right under the Constitution to have his vote fairly counted , without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.
” The lawsuit also challenges the Secretary of State ’ s “ vote by mail ” scheme as a violation of Article II , section 1 , clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution , which grants the State legislature the sole authority for the election process .
There are a few exceptional cases in which the U.S. Constitution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a particular branch of a State ’ s government .
Article II , section 1 , clause 2 is one of them .
It provides that “ [ e ] ach State shall appoint , in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct , ” electors for President and Vice President .
As the U.S. Supreme Court explained , this provision of the Constitution “ convey [ s ] the broadest power of determination ” and “ leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method ” of appointment .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for appointing Presidential electors , such as the Secretary of State ’ s “ vote by mail ” absentee ballot scheme , runs afoul of this constitutional mandate .
The lawsuit is asking the Court to enjoin the Secretary of State and the Board of State Canvassers from finally certifying the election results and declaring winners of the 2020 general election until an independent audit to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the election is performed .
To perform the audit , the plaintiffs are requesting the appointment of a special master to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ County , specifically including claims of fraud at the TCF Center , and to verify and certify the legality of all absentee ballots ordered through the Secretary of State ’ s absentee ballot scheme .

GR readers are very familiar with AFLC American Freedom Law Center has been my law firm for over a decade handling scores of our First Amendment lawsuits and WINNING them.
Federal Lawsuit Filed Challenging Michigan Election
ALFC, November 16, 2020:
Late yesterday, the American Freedom Law Center, along with associated counsel acting as special counsel for the Thomas More Society based in Chicago, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, challenging the conduct of the 2020 general election in Michigan on behalf of two Michigan voters.
The lawsuit sets forth numerous allegations of election malfeasance at the TCF Center in Detroit and throughout Wayne County, the most populous county in the State, and it demonstrates that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s “vote by mail” scheme violated the U.S. Constitution by directly violating the absentee ballot law passed by the legislature, thereby precipitating fraud at the TCF Center and throughout the State.
As alleged in the lawsuit:
“In Michigan, the Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, a registered Democrat, acting unilaterally and without legislative approval, flooded the electoral process for the 2020 general election with absentee ballots. This was accomplished by the Secretary of State’s unilateral decision to send absentee ballot request forms to every household in Michigan with a registered voter (regardless of whether the voter was still alive or actually resided at that address) and to non-registered voters who were temporarily living in the State. Furthermore, the Secretary of State permitted online requests for absentee ballots without signature verification, thereby allowing for fraud in the process of obtaining an absentee ballot. These actions were not approved or authorized by the State legislature, and for good reason. Predictably, this flood of unauthorized, absentee ballots ensured the dilution of lawful votes and precipitated an unfair and dishonest 2020 general election, as the evidence adduced from the TCF Center in Detroit, Michigan proves.”
The lawsuit names as defendants Jocelyn Benson in her official capacity as Secretary of State and Jeannette Bradshaw in her official capacity as Chair of the Board of State Canvassers for Michigan.
AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel Robert Muise commented:
“Fair and honest elections are the lifeblood of our constitutional republic. American citizens, including those of us who reside in Michigan, demand and deserve honest, fair, and transparent elections. We demand and deserve a process that ensures that our legal votes will count and that illegal votes will not. The Constitution requires it, and for good reason, as our lawsuit demonstrates. Indeed, the evidence shows that the election in Michigan was not honest, fair, and transparent. Consequently, we are asking a federal court to do something about it. At the end of the day, this case seeks to restore the purity and integrity of elections in Michigan so that ‘We the people’ can have confidence in their outcome and thus confidence that those who govern are doing so legitimately.”
The lawsuit alleges violation of the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, both of which protect a private citizen’s legal vote from being debased or diluted by arbitrary and disparate treatment, such as permitting illegal votes that discount proper votes. As stated by the U.S. Supreme Court, “Every voter in a federal . . . election, whether he votes for a candidate with little chance of winning or for one with little chance of losing, has a right under the Constitution to have his vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.”
The lawsuit also challenges the Secretary of State’s “vote by mail” scheme as a violation of Article II, section 1, clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which grants the State legislature the sole authority for the election process.
There are a few exceptional cases in which the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty or confers a power on a particular branch of a State’s government. Article II, section 1, clause 2 is one of them. It provides that “[e]ach State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct,” electors for President and Vice President.
As the U.S. Supreme Court explained, this provision of the Constitution “convey[s] the broadest power of determination” and “leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method” of appointment. A significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors, such as the Secretary of State’s “vote by mail” absentee ballot scheme, runs afoul of this constitutional mandate.
The lawsuit is asking the Court to enjoin the Secretary of State and the Board of State Canvassers from finally certifying the election results and declaring winners of the 2020 general election until an independent audit to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the election is performed. To perform the audit, the plaintiffs are requesting the appointment of a special master to investigate all claims of fraud in Wayne County, specifically including claims of fraud at the TCF Center, and to verify and certify the legality of all absentee ballots ordered through the Secretary of State’s absentee ballot scheme.


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-16--Arizona GOP Congressmen Call for Audit of Maricopa County Ballots

EVERY elected a GOP official is a soldier in this war .
If they aren ’ t fighting for us , they are against us .
A trio of Arizona Republican congressmen — Reps. Andy Biggs , Paul Gosar , and David Schweikert — have called for a “ 100 % audit ” of all ballots in Maricopa County due to what the lawmakers described as issues raised regarding the “ integrity ” of the Grand Canyon state ’ s “ election systems.
” Reps. Biggs ( pictured , left ) , Gosar ( pictured , r ight ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to request the would-be audit ’ s results to be compared to the current vote totals .
“ Americans and Arizonans must have full confidence in our election processes and systems in order to maintain the bedrock of our constitutional republic , ” Biggs said in a statement Monday .
“ Although Arizona conducts elections with far more transparency and accountability than other states , there have been some issues raised about the integrity of some of our election systems within the state .
For this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to go above and beyond to assure the public of the integrity of Maricopa County ’ s elections .
Let ’ s leave no stone unturned in the pursuit of accountability and transparency.
” The development comes after the Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit requesting a hand recount of votes by precinct , accusing Maricopa County of violating the law .
The lawsuit , announced on Thursday , demands a hand recount of votes by sampling precincts rather than “ voting centers , ” which Maricopa County @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election .
Voting centers allow voters from any precinct to cast their ballots .
“ There is a fundamental difference between sampling ‘ polling centers ’ and ‘ precincts , ’ most notable being the fact that there were only around 175 voting centers in this election but there were 748 precincts , ” the Republican Party of Arizona said in a statement , announcing the legal challenge .
[ … ] In other words , the Arizona GOP does not believe a hand-count audit of two percent of 175 voting centers is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a hand-count audit covering two percent of the 748 precincts .
Dr. Kelli Ward , chairwoman of the Republican Party of Arizona , issued a statement on the lawsuit .
“ In the past , voters were assigned a polling place inside their precinct .
The Secretary of State Katie Hobbs wrote an election procedures manual stating that now we ’ re going to a voting center model , ” said Ward .
“ The fact of the matter is , we have to determine whether state statute as it exists is actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ member of the executive branch.
” She added : “ We are getting close to recount territory here and we are working — the Republican Party of Arizona with the Trump campaign , with the RNC — to ensure that every legal vote cast is counted in the way that the voter intended .
We are fighting for you.
” Former Vice President Joe Biden leads President Donald Trump by 11,038 votes in Maricopa County .

EVERY elected a GOP official is a soldier in this war. If they aren’t fighting for us, they are against us.
Arizona GOP Congressmen Call for Audit of Maricopa County Ballots
By: Joshua Caplan, Breitbart, 16 Nov 2020255
A trio of Arizona Republican congressmen — Reps. Andy Biggs, Paul Gosar, and David Schweikert — have called for a “100% audit” of all ballots in Maricopa County due to what the lawmakers described as issues raised regarding the “integrity” of the Grand Canyon state’s “election systems.”
Reps. Biggs (pictured, left), Gosar (pictured,r ight), and Schweikert sent a letter last week to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to request the would-be audit’s results to be compared to the current vote totals.
“Americans and Arizonans must have full confidence in our election processes and systems in order to maintain the bedrock of our constitutional republic,” Biggs said in a statement Monday. “Although Arizona conducts elections with far more transparency and accountability than other states, there have been some issues raised about the integrity of some of our election systems within the state. For this reason, I am calling on the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to go above and beyond to assure the public of the integrity of Maricopa County’s elections. Let’s leave no stone unturned in the pursuit of accountability and transparency.”
The development comes after the Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit requesting a hand recount of votes by precinct, accusing Maricopa County of violating the law.
BREAKING: This afternoon, the @AZGOP filed suit to enforce a hand count by precinct, not voting center, as required by law. "Arizona voters deserve complete assurance that the law will be followed and that only legal votes will be counted." — Chairwoman @kelliwardaz pic.twitter.com/xzcqUT8jTc — Arizona Republican Party (@AZGOP) November 13, 2020
Breitbart News reported Thursday:
The lawsuit, announced on Thursday, demands a hand recount of votes by sampling precincts rather than “voting centers,” which Maricopa County provided in this year’s presidential election. Voting centers allow voters from any precinct to cast their ballots. “There is a fundamental difference between sampling ‘polling centers’ and ‘precincts,’ most notable being the fact that there were only around 175 voting centers in this election but there were 748 precincts,” the Republican Party of Arizona said in a statement, announcing the legal challenge. […] In other words, the Arizona GOP does not believe a hand-count audit of two percent of 175 voting centers is sufficient. Rather, there should be a hand-count audit covering two percent of the 748 precincts.
Dr. Kelli Ward, chairwoman of the Republican Party of Arizona, issued a statement on the lawsuit.
“In the past, voters were assigned a polling place inside their precinct. The Secretary of State Katie Hobbs wrote an election procedures manual stating that now we’re going to a voting center model,” said Ward. “The fact of the matter is, we have to determine whether state statute as it exists is actually supreme to a manual written by a member of the executive branch.”
In today's update, Chairwoman @kelliwardaz talks about the lawsuit filed by the @AZGOP to enforce a hand count by precinct, as opposed to voting center, which is required by state statute. pic.twitter.com/cQ2JxmrCjo — Arizona Republican Party (@AZGOP) November 13, 2020
She added: “We are getting close to recount territory here and we are working — the Republican Party of Arizona with the Trump campaign, with the RNC — to ensure that every legal vote cast is counted in the way that the voter intended. We are fighting for you.”
Former Vice President Joe Biden leads President Donald Trump by 11,038 votes in Maricopa County.
FINAL UPDATE Maricopa County releases final 400+ ballots. Biden nets 16 but it doesn't matter anymore
????Biden lead at 11,038
????Trump needs to tie: pic.twitter.com/vGxGMpQehX — Brahm Resnik (@brahmresnik) November 14, 2020
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-16--Biden Campaign Director Arrested For Electoral Fraud

The Democrats ’ systemic voter fraud and election-stealing is the very definition of voter suppression , by rendering your vote and my vote null and void .
A political director for the Joe Biden campaign has been arrested for electoral fraud .
The Democrat Director of Texas state political strategy for the Joe Biden Presidential campaign has been arrested for electoral fraud .
Democratic Party operative Dallas Jones was formally accused of helping to run an illegal ballot harvesting operation in the state of Texas on behalf of the Joe Biden campaign during this contested Presidential election .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including a former FBI agent and former police officer , testified under oath that they have Democratic Party internal documentation , as well as video evidence and witnesses , for their investigation .
The following is an affidavit from private investigator and retired Houston police officer Mark A. Aguirre , which was submitted under oath .
“ My name is Mark A. Aguirre .
I am above the age of eighteen years and am fully competent to make this affidavit .
The facts stated in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ am a retired captain with the Houston Police Department .
I am now a private investigator .
“ I am currently involved in an investigation related to a wide-ranging and fraudulent ballot harvesting scheme in Harris County intended to rig the elections in the Houston/Harris County area .
This scheme involves voter fraud on a massive scale .
“ Based on interviews , review of documents , and other information , I have identified the individuals in charge of the ballot harvesting scheme .
These individuals include political consultant Dallas Jones , who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for President campaign to oversee their Harris County initiative , District 13 Texas State Senator Borris Miles , who is the handler of Mr. Jones , political consultant Gerald Womack , and Precinct 1 Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis .
One of the companies these individuals are using as a front for this operation is AB Canvassing , although there are others that have been identified that we are investigating.
” “ I have in my possession video-taped interviews of witnesses attesting to the aforementioned people having groups of people completing thousands of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ballots for deceased individuals ; illegally going into nursing homes , with the complicity of the nursing home staff , and filling out and forging the signatures of nursing home residents ; signing up homeless individuals to vote using the ballot harvester ’ s address , then completing the ballot and forging the homeless individual ’ s signature .
“ This entire operation is being run by the elite politicians of the Democrat Party in Houston/Harris County .
”

UPDATED: Previous news reports indicated Dallas Jones had been arrested. These reports were premature. No record of Mr.Jones’s arrest can be found.
Biden Campaign Operative, Texas State Senator Accused of Mail-in Ballot Fraud
Witnesses allege Texas Sen. Boris Miles and Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis were orchestrating a ballot harvesting scheme with help from Biden campaign official Dallas Jones.
By:Holly Hansen and Brad Johnson, The Texan, September 28, 2020:
New affidavits filed with the Supreme Court of Texas (SCOTX) Monday allege a coordinated ballot harvesting operation in Harris County.
The two testimonials specifically name state Senator Boris Miles (D-Houston) and Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis (D-Pct. 1) as leaders of an election fraud scheme that involves stealing absentee ballots from nursing homes and forging voter signatures.
Another individual named is Dallas Jones, a political operative overseeing Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s Harris County operation.
First reported by National File, the witness testimony included in the affidavits were submitted in conjunction with a lawsuit filed by conservative activist Steven Hotze and others.
A former FBI agent and now private investigator writes in his sworn testimony that he has investigated ballot harvesting allegations since December of 2019 after two individuals told him they had witnessed illegal ballot harvesting activity.
The Democrats’ systemic voter fraud and election-stealing is the very definition of voter suppression, by rendering your vote and my vote null and void.
The following is an affidavit from private investigator and retired Houston police officer Mark A. Aguirre, which was submitted under oath.
“My name is Mark A. Aguirre. I am above the age of eighteen years and am fully competent to make this affidavit. The facts stated in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct.
“I am a retired captain with the Houston Police Department. I am now a private investigator.
“I am currently involved in an investigation related to a wide-ranging and fraudulent ballot harvesting scheme in Harris County intended to rig the elections in the Houston/Harris County area. This scheme involves voter fraud on a massive scale.
“Based on interviews, review of documents, and other information, I have identified the individuals in charge of the ballot harvesting scheme. These individuals include political consultant Dallas Jones, who was recently hired by the Joe Biden for President campaign to oversee their Harris County initiative, District 13 Texas State Senator Borris Miles, who is the handler of Mr. Jones, political consultant Gerald Womack, and Precinct 1 Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis. One of the companies these individuals are using as a front for this operation is AB Canvassing, although there are others that have been identified that we are investigating.”
“I have in my possession video-taped interviews of witnesses attesting to the aforementioned people having groups of people completing thousands of absentee and mail-in ballots, including completing ballots for deceased individuals; illegally going into nursing homes, with the complicity of the nursing home staff, and filling out and forging the signatures of nursing home residents; signing up homeless individuals to vote using the ballot harvester’s address, then completing the ballot and forging the homeless individual’s signature.
“This entire operation is being run by the elite politicians of the Democrat Party in Houston/Harris County.”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-16--Far Left Radical Stacey Abrams: ‘More Than 600,000’ Georgians Already Requested Mail Ballots for Run

Far Left Radical Stacey Abrams: ‘More Than 600,000’ Georgians Already Requested Mail Ballots for Runoff Election

And the steal begins .
Again , This election should be under the supervision of a federal agency .
Help elect @ ReverendWarnock and @ ossoff to the U.S. Senate by requesting your ballot today ➡ https : //t.co/xCyh7BhY3o .
Happy voting and let ’ s get it done… again .
# gapol pic.twitter.com/G65qB8NMpg BREAKING : More than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots for the January 5 runoff elections .
Stacey Abrams : ‘ More Than 600,000 ’ Georgians Already Requested Mail Ballots for Runoff Election Failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams announced Sunday that “ more than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” for the Senate runoff elections on January 5 , urging her followers to support the Democrat candidates .
“ More than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots for the January 5 runoff elections , ” Abrams wrote in a tweet Sunday morning .
“ Help elect @ ReverendWarnock and @ ossoff to the U.S. Senate by requesting your ballot today.
” “ Happy voting and let ’ s get it done… again , ” Abrams added .
Included in Abrams ’ s tweet was a link at which Georgia residents can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elections between Sen. Kelly Loeffler ( R-GA ) and her Democrat challenger Raphael Warnock , and another between Sen. David Perdue ( R-GA ) and his Democrat opponent Jon Ossoff .
Earlier this month , it was reported that those two Senate races in the Peach State could be some of the most expensive in history .
One estimate said the spending could go beyond $ 200 million .
Last week , Abrams reached out to “ Georgia students ” who were registered in an attempt to have them request their mail ballot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is rallying Democrats ahead of the runoff elections , both Perdue and Loeffler continue to raise substantial amounts of money for their campaigns .
A November 12 report from the Wall Street Journal found that the two Republican candidates in Georgia had raised more than $ 32 million in a matter of six days after the National Republican Senatorial Committee combined with their campaigns .
With questions surrounding the integrity of this year ’ s presidential election in Georgia , both Loeffler and Perdue have called on Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures .
“ The management of Georgia elections has become an embarrassment for our state .
Georgians are outraged , and rightly so , ” a statement via Perdue and Loeffler read .
“ We have been clear from the beginning : every legal vote cast should be counted .
Any illegal vote must not .
And there must be transparency and uniformity in the counting process .
This isn ’ t hard .
This isn ’ t partisan .
This is American.
” Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Loeffler and Perdue ’ s reelection bids .

And the steal begins. Again,
This election should be under the supervision of a federal agency.
BREAKING: More than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots for the January 5 runoff elections. Help elect @ReverendWarnock and @ossoff to the U.S. Senate by requesting your ballot today ➡ https://t.co/xCyh7BhY3o. Happy voting and let’s get it done… again. #gapol pic.twitter.com/G65qB8NMpg — Stacey Abrams (@staceyabrams) November 15, 2020
Stacey Abrams: ‘More Than 600,000’ Georgians Already Requested Mail Ballots for Runoff Election By: Kyle Morris, Breitbart News, November 15, 2020: Failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams announced Sunday that “more than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots” for the Senate runoff elections on January 5, urging her followers to support the Democrat candidates. “More than 600,000 Georgians have requested their mail ballots for the January 5 runoff elections,” Abrams wrote in a tweet Sunday morning. “Help elect @ReverendWarnock and @ossoff to the U.S. Senate by requesting your ballot today.” “Happy voting and let’s get it done… again,” Abrams added. Included in Abrams’s tweet was a link at which Georgia residents can request a mail-in ballot for the runoff elections between Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) and her Democrat challenger Raphael Warnock, and another between Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) and his Democrat opponent Jon Ossoff. Earlier this month, it was reported that those two Senate races in the Peach State could be some of the most expensive in history. One estimate said the spending could go beyond $200 million. Last week, Abrams reached out to “Georgia students” who were registered in an attempt to have them request their mail ballot before the runoff election. As Abrams is rallying Democrats ahead of the runoff elections, both Perdue and Loeffler continue to raise substantial amounts of money for their campaigns. A November 12 report from the Wall Street Journal found that the two Republican candidates in Georgia had raised more than $32 million in a matter of six days after the National Republican Senatorial Committee combined with their campaigns. With questions surrounding the integrity of this year’s presidential election in Georgia, both Loeffler and Perdue have called on Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to resign over his handling of voting measures. “The management of Georgia elections has become an embarrassment for our state. Georgians are outraged, and rightly so,” a statement via Perdue and Loeffler read. “We have been clear from the beginning: every legal vote cast should be counted. Any illegal vote must not. And there must be transparency and uniformity in the counting process. This isn’t hard. This isn’t partisan. This is American.” Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has also vowed to give $1 million to Loeffler and Perdue’s reelection bids.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-11-16--Al Qaeda No. 2 Leader Is Assassinated by Israel in Iran

The United States does not have a better friend than Israel .
The U.S-Israel alliance has reached unprecedented heights under President Trump .
This is why ( in-part ) some of the worlds most dangerous terrorists have been brought to justice in the first Trump term .
However , if Joe Biden is elected president than this alliance will most certainly be downgraded .
That is because Joe Biden will make every effort to appease the Palestinian Authority .
And it is the American people who will become less safe .
Watch the analysis from ex CIA agent Norman T. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ harbors the world ’ s worst terrorists .
The Democrats support these mass murderers .
Related – US , Israel worked together to track and kill al-Qaida No .
2 Al-Qaeda ’ s No .
2 Reportedly Killed In Secret Operation In Iran Al-Qaeda ’ s second-highest leader , accused of orchestrating the deadly 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa , was killed by Israeli agents in Iran in August , The New York Times reported .
Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah , aka Abu Muhammad al-Masri , was gunned down by two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Tehran on August 7 , The New York Times reported on November 13 .
Masri was seen as a likely successor to Al-Qaeda ’ s current leader , Ayman al-Zawahri .
Citing intelligence officials , The New York Times said Israeli operatives carried out the assassination at the behest of the United States .
Iran ’ s Foreign Ministry “ strongly ” denied the report and said there were no Al-Qaeda “ terrorists ” on Iranian soil .
“ From time to time , Washington and Tel Aviv try to tie Iran @ @ @ @ @ @ @ false information to the media in order to avoid responsibility for the criminal activities of this group and other terrorist groups in the region , ” Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said on November 14 , just a few hours after The New York Times story was published .
“ Even though America has not shied away from making any false accusation against Iran in the past , this approach has become routine in the current U.S. administration , ” Khatibzadeh added .
A U.S. official , speaking to Reuters on condition of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of The Times ’ story or say whether there was any U.S. involvement .
The Israeli prime minister ’ s office said it was not commenting on the report .
The United States had been tracking the movements of Masri and other Al-Qaeda operatives in Iran for years , but it was unclear what , if any , role Washington played in the operation , The Times reported .
Neither Iran , Al-Qaeda , the United States , nor Israel have ever publicly acknowledged the killing .
Masri was killed with his daughter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Osama bin Laden ’ s son , Hamza bin Laden , The Times reported .
Shi ’ ite Iran and Al-Qaeda , a militant Sunni extremist group , are enemies with opposing ideologies .
U.S. intelligence officials say Masri had been in Iran ’ s custody since 2003 but had been living freely since at least 2015 .
Some terrorism experts have speculated Iran has kept a few Al-Qaeda figures as an insurance to dissuade the group from carrying out attacks in Iran or for prisoner exchanges .
The group may also be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a common enemy .
The Egyptian born Masri , one of Al-Qaeda ’ s founding leaders , was on the FBI ’ s list of most-wanted terrorists .
The bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 left 224 people dead and more than 5,000 injured .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

The United States does not have a better friend than Israel. The U.S-Israel alliance has reached unprecedented heights under President Trump. This is why (in-part) some of the worlds most dangerous terrorists have been brought to justice in the first Trump term. However, if Joe Biden is elected president than this alliance will most certainly be downgraded. That is because Joe Biden will make every effort to appease the Palestinian Authority. And it is the American people who will become less safe. Watch the analysis from ex CIA agent Norman T. Roule.
Islamic terror state of Iran harbors the world’s worst terrorists. The Democrats support these mass murderers.
Al Qaeda's number two man, Abu Mohammed al-Masri -reportedly killed by Israeli agents – will be 'very difficult, if not impossible to replace,' says @Norman_Roule. pic.twitter.com/WvwW4HXuvi — i24NEWS English (@i24NEWS_EN) November 15, 2020
Related – US, Israel worked together to track and kill al-Qaida No. 2
Al-Qaeda’s No. 2 Reportedly Killed In Secret Operation In Iran By Radio Liberty, November 15, 2020 Al-Qaeda’s second-highest leader, accused of orchestrating the deadly 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa, was killed by Israeli agents in Iran in August, The New York Times reported. Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah, aka Abu Muhammad al-Masri, was gunned down by two men on a motorcycle on the streets of Tehran on August 7, The New York Times reported on November 13. Masri was seen as a likely successor to Al-Qaeda’s current leader, Ayman al-Zawahri. Citing intelligence officials, The New York Times said Israeli operatives carried out the assassination at the behest of the United States. Iran’s Foreign Ministry “strongly” denied the report and said there were no Al-Qaeda “terrorists” on Iranian soil. “From time to time, Washington and Tel Aviv try to tie Iran to such groups by lying and leaking false information to the media in order to avoid responsibility for the criminal activities of this group and other terrorist groups in the region,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said on November 14, just a few hours after The New York Times story was published. “Even though America has not shied away from making any false accusation against Iran in the past, this approach has become routine in the current U.S. administration,” Khatibzadeh added. A U.S. official, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, declined to confirm any details of The Times’ story or say whether there was any U.S. involvement. The Israeli prime minister’s office said it was not commenting on the report. The United States had been tracking the movements of Masri and other Al-Qaeda operatives in Iran for years, but it was unclear what, if any, role Washington played in the operation, The Times reported. Neither Iran, Al-Qaeda, the United States, nor Israel have ever publicly acknowledged the killing. Masri was killed with his daughter, the widow of former Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden’s son, Hamza bin Laden, The Times reported. Shi’ite Iran and Al-Qaeda, a militant Sunni extremist group, are enemies with opposing ideologies. U.S. intelligence officials say Masri had been in Iran’s custody since 2003 but had been living freely since at least 2015. Some terrorism experts have speculated Iran has kept a few Al-Qaeda figures as an insurance to dissuade the group from carrying out attacks in Iran or for prisoner exchanges. The group may also be a useful card against the United States, a common enemy. Iranian officials have denied providing Al-Qaeda sanctuary or support. The Egyptian born Masri, one of Al-Qaeda’s founding leaders, was on the FBI’s list of most-wanted terrorists. The bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 left 224 people dead and more than 5,000 injured.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here