pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--Breaking news: French athletes were contaminated by the CCP virus in Wuhan in October

During a March 25 interview on the French local TV channel Loire 7 , about the postponement of the Tokyo Olympic Games , Elodie Clouvel , the Pentathlon world champion , gave a invaluable information about when the Chinese coronavirus really started , and for how long the Communists really hid it to the rest of the world .
Her testimony is as disturbing as it sounds .
The retroactive analysis of tests kept at the Bondy hospital , allowed so far the identification of a carrier of the coronavirus as early as December 27th in France .
The first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Elodie Clouvel had just been questioned about her possible anxiety to envisage a summer in Japan , “ on a continent where the disease has broken out ” .
“ No , because I think that with Valentin ( Editor ’ s note : Belaud , her companion , also a pentathlete ) we have already had the coronavirus , finally Covid-19 , ” she said .
“ We were in Wuhan for the World Military Games at the end of October .
And , in fact , it turns out that afterwards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three days of training .
I was sick too .
…I got stuff I didn ’ t get before .
We didn ’ t worry any more than that because we didn ’ t talk about it yet .
» Her conclusion is also unequivocal : Until today , the first recognized case of Covid-19 in China dates back to November 17 .
But the Military World Games – nearly 10,000 athletes representing 100 nations – took place from October 18 to October 27 .
On Tuesday , French News cable channel BFMTV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the testimony of one of the 281 French athletes who were present in Wuhan and “ fell ill just like several members of the French delegation ” when he came back from China .
French athletes were ordered not to talk to journalists Elodie Clouvel refuses to talk about the pandemic anymore .
The interview she gave on 25 March did did not have the liking of the military hierarchy .
Most French athletes have been asked not to respond to journalists on the subject .
As several of them told the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instructed to refer questions to the army communications service .
Several French athletes who were in Wuhan in October received a call from the army a few weeks ago to reassure them .
“ We were told : there is no risk , you left on October 28 , and the virus arrived on November 1st , ” said one of them .
Other athletes must have been contaminated too In such a context , the French can not be the only potentially infected athletes .
• Many sick people have been identified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ delegation , some of whom were suffering from high fevers on their return .
“ But none of the people tested tested positive , ” the Swedish Armed Forces ’ communication service NSD said in mid-April at the NSD site .
• The L ’ essentiel website mentions the testimonies of Luxembourg sportsmen.Swimmer Julien Henx remembers an infrared body temperature check when he disembarked from the plane that took him back from China.Shot putter Bob Bertemes remembers that “ in the village they cleaned everything twice a day and at midnight they would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Before adding , about swimmer Raphaël Stacchiotti : “ He was sick there .
From then on , they put him in his room and told him that he was the first coronavirus case .
On Wednesday evening , the French ministry published a press release saying there had not been “ any cases declared to the Army Health Service ( SSA ) of influenza or hospitalization within the French delegation of the WMBD , during and after the Games , which could be similar to cases of Covid-19 .
» Zhao Lijian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foreign ministry , suggested on Twitter on March 12 that the coronavirus may have been introduced by the U.S. delegation that participated in the games .
He then retracted this Communist propaganda .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

During a March 25 interview on the French local TV channel Loire 7, about the postponement of the Tokyo Olympic Games, Elodie Clouvel, the Pentathlon world champion, gave a invaluable information about when the Chinese coronavirus really started, and for how long the Communists really hid it to the rest of the world.
Her testimony is as disturbing as it sounds. The retroactive analysis of tests kept at the Bondy hospital, allowed so far the identification of a carrier of the coronavirus as early as December 27th in France. The first case started almost certainly much earlier.
Elodie Clouvel had just been questioned about her possible anxiety to envisage a summer in Japan, “on a continent where the disease has broken out”. “No, because I think that with Valentin (Editor’s note: Belaud, her companion, also a pentathlete) we have already had the coronavirus, finally Covid-19,” she said.
And the 31-year-old explained:
“We were in Wuhan for the World Military Games at the end of October. And, in fact, it turns out that afterwards we all got sick. Valentin missed three days of training. I was sick too. …I got stuff I didn’t get before. We didn’t worry any more than that because we didn’t talk about it yet. »
Her conclusion is also unequivocal:
“There are many athletes from the Military World Games who have been very ill. We had contact with the military doctor recently who told us: ‘I think you got it [the Chinese coronavirus] because there were a lot of people in this delegation who were sick. »
Until today, the first recognized case of Covid-19 in China dates back to November 17.
But the Military World Games – nearly 10,000 athletes representing 100 nations – took place from October 18 to October 27.
On Tuesday, French News cable channel BFMTV also reported, on condition of anonymity, the testimony of one of the 281 French athletes who were present in Wuhan and “fell ill just like several members of the French delegation” when he came back from China.
French athletes were ordered not to talk to journalists
Elodie Clouvel refuses to talk about the pandemic anymore. The interview she gave on 25 March did did not have the liking of the military hierarchy.
Most French athletes have been asked not to respond to journalists on the subject. As several of them told the French daily Le Parisien, they were instructed to refer questions to the army communications service.
Several French athletes who were in Wuhan in October received a call from the army a few weeks ago to reassure them. “We were told: there is no risk, you left on October 28, and the virus arrived on November 1st,” said one of them.
Other athletes must have been contaminated too
In such a context, the French cannot be the only potentially infected athletes.
Many sick people have been identified within the 100 athletes from the Swedish delegation, some of whom were suffering from high fevers on their return. “But none of the people tested tested positive,” the Swedish Armed Forces’ communication service NSD said in mid-April at the NSD site.
The L’essentiel website mentions the testimonies of Luxembourg sportsmen.Swimmer Julien Henx remembers an infrared body temperature check when he disembarked from the plane that took him back from China.Shot putter Bob Bertemes remembers that “in the village they cleaned everything twice a day and at midnight they would go to the street cleaning”. Before adding, about swimmer Raphaël Stacchiotti: “He was sick there. From then on, they put him in his room and told him that he was the first coronavirus case.
On Wednesday evening, the French ministry published a press release saying there had not been “any cases declared to the Army Health Service (SSA) of influenza or hospitalization within the French delegation of the WMBD, during and after the Games, which could be similar to cases of Covid-19. »
Zhao Lijian, a spokesman for China’s foreign ministry, suggested on Twitter on March 12 that the coronavirus may have been introduced by the U.S. delegation that participated in the games. He then retracted this Communist propaganda.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--Facebook ‘Supreme Court’ Packed with Anti-Trump, Progressive Figures

Break up Facebook .
Facebook seeks to suppress pro-Trump speech , six months before the presidential election .
This is madness .
You can ’ t discriminate and still be protected by taxpayer $ $ $ # Censorship https : //t.co/6qMhW2eYSQ It ’ s time to strip these companies of all the protections they get from government .
If the Social Media Masters want to censor one side ’ s free speech they should not have those protections from the Govt .
Facebook has released a list of the first 20 members of its “ Oversight Board , ” a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up that will have the power to decide whether content banned by Facebook stays banned or is restored on appeal .
Members include the former editor-in-chief of the Guardian and a “ human rights expert ” who is part of George Soros ’ Open Society project .
Colloquially known as the “ Facebook Supreme Court , ” the idea for the body was hatched by Harvard Law professor Noah Feldman , a liberal academic and one of the Democrats ’ “ expert witnesses ” during the impeachment hearings .
Also involved in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ non-profit , BSR .
The 20 members announced by Facebook today include progressive , left-wing , and mainstream media figures who have been highly critical of President Trump .
One addition is Alan Rusbridger , formerly editor-in-chief of the Guardian , the U.K. ’ s leading left-wing newspaper .
His appointment to Facebook ’ s Oversight Board — and the lack of any figures from conservative media — has already drawn condemnation from Conservative Party MPs in the U.K. Damian Green MP , a member of the U.K. Parliament ’ s committee on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said that Facebook “ fails miserably to provide confidence in its political balance.
” “ Globally , Facebook is much more important than any newspaper or broadcaster , so it has a consequent responsibility to demonstrate it is open to a range of views , ” he continued .
Alan Rusbridger and the Guardian are more infamous in Britain than the U.S. , but the former editor-in-chief is no fan of Trump .
In September 2017 , he expressed his support for Robert Mueller ’ s “ obstruction of justice ” investigation against @ @

Break up Facebook. Facebook seeks to suppress pro-Trump speech, six months before the presidential election. This is madness.
It’s time to strip these companies of all the protections they get from government. If the Social Media Masters want to censor one side’s free speech they should not have those protections from the Govt. You can’t discriminate and still be protected by taxpayer $$$ #Censorship https://t.co/6qMhW2eYSQ — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) May 7, 2020
Facebook ‘Supreme Court’ Packed with Anti-Trump, Progressive Figures By Breitbart, May 6, 2020 Facebook has released a list of the first 20 members of its “Oversight Board,” a semi-independent body the social network is setting up that will have the power to decide whether content banned by Facebook stays banned or is restored on appeal. Members include the former editor-in-chief of the Guardian and a “human rights expert” who is part of George Soros’ Open Society project. Colloquially known as the “Facebook Supreme Court,” the idea for the body was hatched by Harvard Law professor Noah Feldman, a liberal academic and one of the Democrats’ “expert witnesses” during the impeachment hearings. Also involved in the body’s development was a progressive non-profit, BSR. The 20 members announced by Facebook today include progressive, left-wing, and mainstream media figures who have been highly critical of President Trump. One addition is Alan Rusbridger, formerly editor-in-chief of the Guardian, the U.K.’s leading left-wing newspaper. His appointment to Facebook’s Oversight Board — and the lack of any figures from conservative media — has already drawn condemnation from Conservative Party MPs in the U.K. Damian Green MP, a member of the U.K. Parliament’s committee on Culture, Media, and Sport, said that Facebook “fails miserably to provide confidence in its political balance.” “Globally, Facebook is much more important than any newspaper or broadcaster, so it has a consequent responsibility to demonstrate it is open to a range of views,” he continued. Alan Rusbridger and the Guardian are more infamous in Britain than the U.S., but the former editor-in-chief is no fan of Trump. In September 2017, he expressed his support for Robert Mueller’s “obstruction of justice” investigation against Trump.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--How communists conquered America: “Life on the dole with Netflix is going to look like an attractive

How communists conquered America: “Life on the dole with Netflix is going to look like an attractive proposition for some, perhaps many”

“ Unless people can get back on the job quickly , life on the dole with Netflix is going to start to look like an attractive proposition for some , perhaps many.
” I can tell you that the left would not have been able to pull this off twenty years ago , let alone fifty or more .
We wouldn ’ t have had it .
Today ’ s young people are a sad but stunning indictment of the left ’ s destruction of the American mind .
The young willingly hiding in their homes from a flu whose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a bad B-movie — a thoroughly unbelievable premise .
And yet here we are .
It ’ s not young people demonstrating for freedom , it ’ s older people .
Worse , the young are snitching on their neighbors and engaging in vile attacks on social media on those they perceive have in somehow violated social distancing measures .
Bloody Hitler-like youth — except they are all cowering in their mom ’ s basements .
By Michael Walsh , The Epoch Times , May 5 , 2020 : A couple of months @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high .
The economy was going gang-busters , and the various Democrat and “ resistance ” coup attempts , from the Russian collusion hoax through the Ukrainian phone-call impeachment gambit ( Does anybody still remember what that was all about ? )
, had fallen short .
Reelection , if not assured , looked very likely .
And then came the CCP ( Chinese Communist Party ) virus .
In a stroke , and without a single constitutional shot fired , the country was given over to two unelected doctors named Anthony Fauci @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discovered the virtues of federalism , and the economy slammed into the brick wall of the CCP virus , commonly known as the novel coronavirus , as governors across the country trashed the Constitution and began ordering their residents around like serfs .
The anti-Trump media immediately jumped into the fray , warning of plagues , boils , locusts , and frogs falling from the sky ; in a trice , the second coming of the Black Death was upon us .
Millions would die , they confidently predicted , based on airy-fairy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( the same kinds of places that gave us the “ global warming ” hoax a decade ago ) .
If drastic measures weren ’ t taken right away , American streets would soon look like the zombie dystopia of “ The Walking Dead.
” Out of either ignorance or willfulness , the media began conflating infections with demises—this for a virus to which young and fit people with strong immune systems are essentially insusceptible , and whose greatest damage is done among an extremely elderly population with such comorbidities as diabetes , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , largely among people in nursing homes .
New York City ’ s abnormally high death rate was merged with the overall national numbers , making things look worse even for folks in rural environments , where the disease is practically unknown .
The measures , we were told , were to “ flatten the curve ” in order to slow the spread and thus prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed .
When the hospitals weathered the outbreaks , we were told that the resumption of normal activity wouldn ’ t be safe until @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine was developed , or until the Twelfth of Never , whichever came first .
Sports entrepreneur Mark Cuban , whose principal claim to fame is that he owns a basketball team , came up with the gimcrack idea of hiring and training millions of the newly unemployed to act as contract tracers , snooping around the sick to find out with whom they ’ ve come into contact .
Thus far , no one has suggested the East Asian solution ( South Korea , Singapore , Hong Kong ) , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ visitors for 14 days with the mobile phone equivalent of an ankle bracelet , but you can bet that ’ s coming .
And so everything from the sacred ( churches and synagogues ) to the profane ( California beaches ) was shuttered , the hospitality industry cratered , the airlines found themselves grounded , the Trump economy died , and the president ’ s reelection chances are going up in smoke along with the incinerated jobs of some 30 million American breadwinners .
( Even so , the current unemployment rate is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy in which optimal , non-inflationary “ full employment ” is considered reached at 4 percent . )
There ’ s no doubt that Trump will be blamed for the disaster , on the principle that “ the buck stops here.
” It matters not that he closed down air travel from China early on : that was racist , xenophobic , and too little , too late .
He bossed the governors around too much ; he bossed the governors around not enough .
He never held enough press conferences until he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fauci and the Scarf Lady ( Dr. Birx ) , and then that was too many .
In short , the Democrats have Trump right where they want him .
Only six months before the Nov. 3 election , the president has to move quickly to get the country back to normal—not the “ new normal ” beloved of privation-adoring Democrats , but the way things were—and hope the virus really doesn ’ t turn into the bubonic plague as the ghoulish media lovingly records every death .
Elections are generally won or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump can no longer ask voters whether they ’ re better off than they were four years ago , because the answer is surely no .
That answer is also surely right .
It ’ s not just the economic damage that threatens to make Trump a one-term president , it ’ s the damage done to the U.S. constitution , psyche , spirit , and way of life .
The erstwhile self-reliant Home of the Brave has been reduced to the land of sniveling cowards , dutifully penning themselves in at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ order of professional politicians whose emoluments aren ’ t affected one whit by their actions .
Unless people can get back on the job quickly , life on the dole with Netflix is going to start to look like an attractive proposition for some , perhaps many .
Turning the nation over to the doctors was an unforced error of epic proportions .
History already shows it to be so .
In 1968–69 , the world was ravaged by the Hong Kong flu , another deadly flu virus that went on to kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100,000 of them in the United States .
And yet , the media hardly mentioned it ; it was just one of those things .
And rather than canceling history while waiting for a vaccine ( there finally was one , but long after the pandemic had run its natural course ) , the following things weren ’ t canceled between the fall of ’ 68 and the summer of ’ 69 : the Mexico City Olympics ( held in October that year ) , the 1968 presidential election , Apollo 8 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Chappaquiddick , the moon landing , Woodstock , and the Manson family .
Worst of all has been the damage done to the Constitution .
Apparently , the First Amendment ’ s guarantees of the free exercise of religion and the freedom of assembly no longer mean anything .
But where , one wonders , are the conservative lawyers , or the conservative judges we ’ ve heard too much about , or even the rank hypocrites of the American Civil Liberties Union ?
Our Bill of Rights has been tattered without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are going to want to take this out on somebody , and incumbents will do nicely , thanks .
White House speechwriters had better be working overtime on a rallying speech that will guarantee the restoration of our liberties and our livelihoods , or he could lose to a hologram of Joe Biden and whichever black woman ( Michelle Obama ? )
he has chosen as his running mate .
Nor will the GOP likely fare any better in Congress .
The House was needlessly lost to Speaker Nancy Pelosi two years ago @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the chances it will return to Republican control in the post-COVID-19 era ?
As for the Senate , a combination of an unfavorable map ( 23 Republican seats are up , as opposed to 12 occupied by Democrats ) , a narrow majority ( 53–47 , plus the vice president in case of ties ) , and a slew of unlikeable and undistinguished candidates spell big trouble .
A net gain of four seats—three if the Democrats win the White House—and the whole Trump revolution goes down the tubes .
It could happen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sure loser ; ditto Kelly Loeffler in Georgia .
Iowa ’ s Joni Ernst and Maine ’ s Susan Collins are far from sure bets , and neither is North Carolina ’ s Thom Tillis , who will suffer for the sins of his unpopular colleague , Richard Burr .
( Both Loeffler and Burr have been tarred by allegations of insider trading related to the virus . )
Rounding out the roster , the unimpressive Cory Gardner of rapidly bluing Colorado and the annoying anti-Trumper Ben Sasse of Nebraska could also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrats have only one sure loser , Doug Jones of Alabama .
This isn ’ t to say any of this is guaranteed to happen .
Six months is a lifetime in politics .
But isn ’ t it better to think—and do something !
—about it now , rather than on Nov. 4 ?
Michael Walsh is the author of “ The Devil ’ s Pleasure Palace ” and “ The Fiery Angel , ” both published by Encounter Books .
His latest book , “ Last Stands , ” a cultural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published later this year by St. Martin ’ s Press .
Follow him on Twitter @ dkahanerules .

“Unless people can get back on the job quickly, life on the dole with Netflix is going to start to look like an attractive proposition for some, perhaps many.”
I can tell you that the left would not have been able to pull this off twenty years ago, let alone fifty or more. We wouldn’t have had it. Today’s young people are a sad but stunning indictment of the left’s destruction of the American mind. The young willingly hiding in their homes from a flu whose real danger is to octogenarians seems like a bad B-movie — a thoroughly unbelievable premise. And yet here we are. It’s not young people demonstrating for freedom, it’s older people. Worse, the young are snitching on their neighbors and engaging in vile attacks on social media on those they perceive have in somehow violated social distancing measures. Bloody Hitler-like youth — except they are all cowering in their mom’s basements.
The Rule of Doctors Threatens Trump’s Reelection, American Well-Being
By Michael Walsh, The Epoch Times, May 5, 2020:
A couple of months ago, President Donald Trump was riding high.
The economy was going gang-busters, and the various Democrat and “resistance” coup attempts, from the Russian collusion hoax through the Ukrainian phone-call impeachment gambit (Does anybody still remember what that was all about?), had fallen short. Reelection, if not assured, looked very likely.
And then came the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.
In a stroke, and without a single constitutional shot fired, the country was given over to two unelected doctors named Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx, the Democrats suddenly discovered the virtues of federalism, and the economy slammed into the brick wall of the CCP virus, commonly known as the novel coronavirus, as governors across the country trashed the Constitution and began ordering their residents around like serfs.
The anti-Trump media immediately jumped into the fray, warning of plagues, boils, locusts, and frogs falling from the sky; in a trice, the second coming of the Black Death was upon us. Millions would die, they confidently predicted, based on airy-fairy “models” from second-tier British universities (the same kinds of places that gave us the “global warming” hoax a decade ago). If drastic measures weren’t taken right away, American streets would soon look like the zombie dystopia of “The Walking Dead.”
Out of either ignorance or willfulness, the media began conflating infections with demises—this for a virus to which young and fit people with strong immune systems are essentially insusceptible, and whose greatest damage is done among an extremely elderly population with such comorbidities as diabetes, obesity, and heart disease—and even then, largely among people in nursing homes. New York City’s abnormally high death rate was merged with the overall national numbers, making things look worse even for folks in rural environments, where the disease is practically unknown.
Then, the goalposts started moving.
The measures, we were told, were to “flatten the curve” in order to slow the spread and thus prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed. When the hospitals weathered the outbreaks, we were told that the resumption of normal activity wouldn’t be safe until widespread testing was underway, or until a vaccine was developed, or until the Twelfth of Never, whichever came first.
Sports entrepreneur Mark Cuban, whose principal claim to fame is that he owns a basketball team, came up with the gimcrack idea of hiring and training millions of the newly unemployed to act as contract tracers, snooping around the sick to find out with whom they’ve come into contact. Thus far, no one has suggested the East Asian solution (South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong), which involves cellphone monitoring via apps and quarantining visitors for 14 days with the mobile phone equivalent of an ankle bracelet, but you can bet that’s coming.
And so everything from the sacred (churches and synagogues) to the profane (California beaches) was shuttered, the hospitality industry cratered, the airlines found themselves grounded, the Trump economy died, and the president’s reelection chances are going up in smoke along with the incinerated jobs of some 30 million American breadwinners. (Even so, the current unemployment rate is still only 4.4 percent, in an economy in which optimal, non-inflationary “full employment” is considered reached at 4 percent.)
Blame
There’s no doubt that Trump will be blamed for the disaster, on the principle that “the buck stops here.”
It matters not that he closed down air travel from China early on: that was racist, xenophobic, and too little, too late. He bossed the governors around too much; he bossed the governors around not enough. He never held enough press conferences until he started holding daily briefings, starring Dr. Fauci and the Scarf Lady (Dr. Birx), and then that was too many.
In short, the Democrats have Trump right where they want him. Only six months before the Nov. 3 election, the president has to move quickly to get the country back to normal—not the “new normal” beloved of privation-adoring Democrats, but the way things were—and hope the virus really doesn’t turn into the bubonic plague as the ghoulish media lovingly records every death.
Elections are generally won or lost due to the economy, and Trump can no longer ask voters whether they’re better off than they were four years ago, because the answer is surely no.
That answer is also surely right. It’s not just the economic damage that threatens to make Trump a one-term president, it’s the damage done to the U.S. constitution, psyche, spirit, and way of life. The erstwhile self-reliant Home of the Brave has been reduced to the land of sniveling cowards, dutifully penning themselves in at the behest of unelected physicians and at the order of professional politicians whose emoluments aren’t affected one whit by their actions.
Unless people can get back on the job quickly, life on the dole with Netflix is going to start to look like an attractive proposition for some, perhaps many. Turning the nation over to the doctors was an unforced error of epic proportions.
History already shows it to be so. In 1968–69, the world was ravaged by the Hong Kong flu, another deadly flu virus that went on to kill a million people around the world, 100,000 of them in the United States. And yet, the media hardly mentioned it; it was just one of those things.
And rather than canceling history while waiting for a vaccine (there finally was one, but long after the pandemic had run its natural course), the following things weren’t canceled between the fall of ’68 and the summer of ’69: the Mexico City Olympics (held in October that year), the 1968 presidential election, Apollo 8, The Who’s “Tommy,” Chappaquiddick, the moon landing, Woodstock, and the Manson family.
Bill of Rights Tattered
Worst of all has been the damage done to the Constitution. Apparently, the First Amendment’s guarantees of the free exercise of religion and the freedom of assembly no longer mean anything. But where, one wonders, are the conservative lawyers, or the conservative judges we’ve heard too much about, or even the rank hypocrites of the American Civil Liberties Union? Our Bill of Rights has been tattered without firing a shot.
The American people are going to want to take this out on somebody, and incumbents will do nicely, thanks. White House speechwriters had better be working overtime on a rallying speech that will guarantee the restoration of our liberties and our livelihoods, or he could lose to a hologram of Joe Biden and whichever black woman (Michelle Obama?) he has chosen as his running mate.
Nor will the GOP likely fare any better in Congress. The House was needlessly lost to Speaker Nancy Pelosi two years ago when times were good. What are the chances it will return to Republican control in the post-COVID-19 era? As for the Senate, a combination of an unfavorable map (23 Republican seats are up, as opposed to 12 occupied by Democrats), a narrow majority (53–47, plus the vice president in case of ties), and a slew of unlikeable and undistinguished candidates spell big trouble. A net gain of four seats—three if the Democrats win the White House—and the whole Trump revolution goes down the tubes.
It could happen. In Arizona, Martha McSally is a sure loser; ditto Kelly Loeffler in Georgia. Iowa’s Joni Ernst and Maine’s Susan Collins are far from sure bets, and neither is North Carolina’s Thom Tillis, who will suffer for the sins of his unpopular colleague, Richard Burr. (Both Loeffler and Burr have been tarred by allegations of insider trading related to the virus.) Rounding out the roster, the unimpressive Cory Gardner of rapidly bluing Colorado and the annoying anti-Trumper Ben Sasse of Nebraska could also go down.
By contrast, the Democrats have only one sure loser, Doug Jones of Alabama.
This isn’t to say any of this is guaranteed to happen. Six months is a lifetime in politics. But isn’t it better to think—and do something!—about it now, rather than on Nov. 4?
Michael Walsh is the author of “The Devil’s Pleasure Palace” and “The Fiery Angel,” both published by Encounter Books. His latest book, “Last Stands,” a cultural study of military history, will be published later this year by St. Martin’s Press. Follow him on Twitter @dkahanerules.


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--Author of new (inaccurate) report predicting 3,000 daily coronavirus deaths says it wasn’t ‘intended

Author of new (inaccurate) report predicting 3,000 daily coronavirus deaths says it wasn’t ‘intended to be a forecast’ BUT intended to slam Trump

Another bogus model to keep folks hiding under their beds , so that the Democrats can destroy the economy in order to defeat Trump .
The thing is , it ’ s wrong , and the author says as much .
The President is undermined at every turn .
The war against the President is a war against us and free will .
Author of report predicting 3,000 daily coronavirus deaths says it wasn ’ t ‘ intended to be a forecast ’ The researcher who developed a controversial report published Monday , suggesting a surge of up to 3,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ couple months , says he never intended for his report to be released .
Associate professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Justin Lessler , told the Washington Post he was responsible for creating the model but doesn ’ t know how or why it was made public as it was not ready to be presented .
“ I had no role in the process by which that was presented and shown , ” Lessler said .
“ It was not in any way intended to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Monday that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was in possession of modeling showing a coronavirus daily death toll of 3,000 people by June 1 with 200,000 new cases per day by that same date .
“ This is not a White House document , nor has it been presented to the Coronavirus Task Force or gone through interagency vetting , ” the White House said Monday in response to that reporting .
“ This data is not reflective of any of the modeling done by the task force , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” the White House said in a statement Monday .
President Trump addressed the model , which he says is based on the premise that the infection rate will be unfettered and doesn ’ t factor in social distancing .
“ That ’ s a report with no mitigation .
So based on no mitigation , but we ’ re doing a lot of mitigation , ” Trump said to reporters as he prepared to board Marine One .
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany elaborated on the president ’ s response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hopkins ’ study being pushed around by the media as factual is based on faulty assumptions and is in no way representative of any federal government projections and , as Johns Hopkins stated , should not be taken as a forecast , ” McEnany said .
“ This ‘ study ’ considered zero mitigation , meaning it was conducted as though no federal guidelines were in place , no contract tracing , no expansion of testing , while removing all shelter in place protocols laid out in the phased approach of the Opening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ co-morbidities.
” The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ option that suits you best .

Another bogus model to keep folks hiding under their beds, so that the Democrats can destroy the economy in order to defeat Trump. The thing is, it’s wrong, and the author says as much.
The President is undermined at every turn. The war against the President is a war against us and free will.
Author of report predicting 3,000 daily coronavirus deaths says it wasn’t ‘intended to be a forecast’ By Andrew Mark Miller|Washington Examiner May 06, 2020: The researcher who developed a controversial report published Monday, suggesting a surge of up to 3,000 coronavirus deaths per day for the next couple months, says he never intended for his report to be released. Associate professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Justin Lessler, told the Washington Post he was responsible for creating the model but doesn’t know how or why it was made public as it was not ready to be presented. “I had no role in the process by which that was presented and shown,” Lessler said. “It was not in any way intended to be a forecast.” It was reported on Monday that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was in possession of modeling showing a coronavirus daily death toll of 3,000 people by June 1 with 200,000 new cases per day by that same date. “This is not a White House document, nor has it been presented to the Coronavirus Task Force or gone through interagency vetting,” the White House said Monday in response to that reporting. “This data is not reflective of any of the modeling done by the task force, or data that the task force has analyzed,” the White House said in a statement Monday. President Trump addressed the model, which he says is based on the premise that the infection rate will be unfettered and doesn’t factor in social distancing. “That’s a report with no mitigation. So based on no mitigation, but we’re doing a lot of mitigation,” Trump said to reporters as he prepared to board Marine One. White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany elaborated on the president’s response to the report. “The Johns Hopkins’ study being pushed around by the media as factual is based on faulty assumptions and is in no way representative of any federal government projections and, as Johns Hopkins stated, should not be taken as a forecast,” McEnany said. “This ‘study’ considered zero mitigation, meaning it was conducted as though no federal guidelines were in place, no contract tracing, no expansion of testing, while removing all shelter in place protocols laid out in the phased approach of the Opening Up America Again guidelines for individuals with co-morbidities.”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--Study: New mutation indicates that coronavirus weakening

It won ’ t matter .
The Democrat party will not reopen .
They are reveling in the misery .
New mutation indicates that coronavirus might be weakening A mutation in the novel coronavirus mirrors a change that occurred in the genetically similar SARS virus in 2003 — indicating that the bug might be weakening , researchers announced in a newly published study .
Lead study author Dr. Efren Lim , an assistant professor at Arizona State University ’ s Biodesign Institute , and his team use a new technology called next-generation sequencing to rapidly read the genetic code of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 .
That technology helps researchers to determine how the virus is spreading , mutating and adapting over time .
Out of the 382 nasal swab samples the researchers examined from coronavirus patients in the state , a single sample was missing a significant chunk of its genome .
Eighty-one of the letters were permanently deleted , according to the new study published in the Journal of Virology .
“ One of the reasons why this mutation is of interest is because it mirrors a large deletion that arose in the 2003 SARS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statement .
During the middle and late phases of the 2003 SARS epidemic , the virus accumulated mutations that lessened its strength , according to the researchers .
“ Where the deletion occurs in the genome is pretty meaningful because it ’ s a known immune protein which means it counteracts the host ’ s antiviral response , ” Lim told the Daily Mail .
A weakened virus that causes less severe symptoms may get a leg up if it is able to spread efficiently through populations by people who don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say .
However , it ’ s too soon to say whether the novel coronavirus is beginning to lose its potency , according to the researchers .
All of the patients whose samples the Arizona scientists analyzed had some clinical coronavirus symptoms — meaning that even the version with 81 deletions was still strong enough to make the patient at least somewhat sick , the Mail reported .
This is the first time such a deletion has been seen in the 16,000 coronavirus genomes that have been sequenced to date , according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than half a percent of the strains circulating , according to the scientists .
There are about 3.6 million confirmed COVID-19 cases worldwide .
“ This is a drop in the bucket , ” Lim told the Mail .
“ One sample is the convincing thing we need to say “ look at this , ” ‘ meaning that if more coronavirus genomes are sequenced , scientists might find far more instances of this attenuated genome , ” he said .

It won’t matter. The Democrat party will not reopen. They are reveling in the misery.
New mutation indicates that coronavirus might be weakening
By: Fox News, May 6, 2020:
A mutation in the novel coronavirus mirrors a change that occurred in the genetically similar SARS virus in 2003 — indicating that the bug might be weakening, researchers announced in a newly published study.
Lead study author Dr. Efren Lim, an assistant professor at Arizona State University’s Biodesign Institute, and his team use a new technology called next-generation sequencing to rapidly read the genetic code of the coronavirus, referred to scientists as SARS-CoV-2.
That technology helps researchers to determine how the virus is spreading, mutating and adapting over time.
Out of the 382 nasal swab samples the researchers examined from coronavirus patients in the state, a single sample was missing a significant chunk of its genome. Eighty-one of the letters were permanently deleted, according to the new study published in the Journal of Virology.
“One of the reasons why this mutation is of interest is because it mirrors a large deletion that arose in the 2003 SARS outbreak,” Lim said in a statement.
During the middle and late phases of the 2003 SARS epidemic, the virus accumulated mutations that lessened its strength, according to the researchers.
“Where the deletion occurs in the genome is pretty meaningful because it’s a known immune protein which means it counteracts the host’s antiviral response,” Lim told the Daily Mail.
A weakened virus that causes less severe symptoms may get a leg up if it is able to spread efficiently through populations by people who don’t know they are infected, the scientists say.
However, it’s too soon to say whether the novel coronavirus is beginning to lose its potency, according to the researchers.
All of the patients whose samples the Arizona scientists analyzed had some clinical coronavirus symptoms — meaning that even the version with 81 deletions was still strong enough to make the patient at least somewhat sick, the Mail reported.
This is the first time such a deletion has been seen in the 16,000 coronavirus genomes that have been sequenced to date, according to the researchers.
That’s less than half a percent of the strains circulating, according to the scientists. There are about 3.6 million confirmed COVID-19 cases worldwide.
“This is a drop in the bucket,” Lim told the Mail.
“One sample is the convincing thing we need to say “look at this,”‘ meaning that if more coronavirus genomes are sequenced, scientists might find far more instances of this attenuated genome,” he said.


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--66% of new coronavirus patients in N.Y. stayed home, further proof lockdowns pointless

Just get on with life .
Especially the young .
73 % of people being hospitalized were 51 and older … And Cuomo should stop sending stricken seniors to their deaths in nursing homes .
Two-thirds of New Yorkers hospitalized with the coronavirus were admitted from their homes , a “ shocking ” statistic that defies social-distancing logic , Gov .
Andrew Cuomo said Wednesday .
The curious conclusion was reached in a three-day survey of patients hospitalized with the bug conducted this week , and revealed by Cuomo during his daily press briefing .
“ Sixty-six percent of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shocking to us , ” said Cuomo .
The same survey found that 46 percent were unemployed , and 37 percent retired .
“ So , that says they ’ re not working , they ’ re not traveling , ” said Cuomo .
“ These people were literally at home.
” ‘ Shocking ’ : 66 % of new coronavirus patients in N.Y. stayed home : Cuomo By Denis Slattery New York Daily News | May 06 , 2020 | 4:37 PM ALBANY — The majority of recently hospitalized coronavirus patients in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the precaution of staying home , Gov .
Cuomo said Wednesday .
The governor said it was “ shocking ” that 66 % of new coronavirus hospitalizations are people who are either retired or unemployed and not commuting to work on a regular basis .
The statistic comes from a preliminary survey of 113 hospitals , done over three days , that included 1,269 responses as the state seeks more information about how COVID-19 spreads .
According to the data , 18 % of new cases came from nursing homes , 4 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ congregate-care facilities , 2 % were homeless , less than 1 % from prisons and 8 % were marked as “ other.
” “ This is a surprise : Overwhelmingly , the people were at home , ” Cuomo said during a briefing on Long Island .
“ We thought maybe they were taking public transportation , and we ’ ve taken special precautions on public transportation , but actually no , because these people were literally at home.
” A total of 46 % of new cases were unemployed and 37 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ factor , the data shows that 73 % of people being hospitalized were 51 and older , the survey found .
Promote health .
Save lives .
Serve the vulnerable .
Visit who.int Most of the hospitalizations have been concentrated in the city and surrounding suburbs , which have been hit hard by the pandemic , Cuomo added .
There were 232 COVID-19 deaths and about 600 new coronavirus patients admitted into New York hospitals a day earlier , the governor said , indicating that the state ’ s hospitalization rate is trending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state looks toward reopening parts of the economy as the end of Cuomo ’ s strict stay-at-home order approaches and other states begin lifting restrictions .
The state is working with former Mayor Michael Bloomberg on a tech-heavy approach to tracing cases and tracking the virus .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Just get on with life. Especially the young. 73% of people being hospitalized were 51 and older …
And Cuomo should stop sending stricken seniors to their deaths in nursing homes.
Two-thirds of New Yorkers hospitalized with the coronavirus were admitted from their homes, a “shocking” statistic that defies social-distancing logic, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Wednesday.
The curious conclusion was reached in a three-day survey of patients hospitalized with the bug conducted this week, and revealed by Cuomo during his daily press briefing.
“Sixty-six percent of the people were at home, which is shocking to us,” said Cuomo.
The same survey found that 46 percent were unemployed, and 37 percent retired.
“So, that says they’re not working, they’re not traveling,” said Cuomo. “These people were literally at home.”
‘Shocking’: 66% of new coronavirus patients in N.Y. stayed home: Cuomo By Denis Slattery New York Daily News | May 06, 2020 | 4:37 PM ALBANY — The majority of recently hospitalized coronavirus patients in New York are people who have followed the precaution of staying home, Gov. Cuomo said Wednesday. The governor said it was “shocking” that 66% of new coronavirus hospitalizations are people who are either retired or unemployed and not commuting to work on a regular basis. The statistic comes from a preliminary survey of 113 hospitals, done over three days, that included 1,269 responses as the state seeks more information about how COVID-19 spreads. According to the data, 18% of new cases came from nursing homes, 4% from assisted-living facilities, 2% from congregate-care facilities, 2% were homeless, less than 1% from prisons and 8% were marked as “other.” “This is a surprise: Overwhelmingly, the people were at home,” Cuomo said during a briefing on Long Island. “We thought maybe they were taking public transportation, and we’ve taken special precautions on public transportation, but actually no, because these people were literally at home.” A total of 46% of new cases were unemployed and 37% were retired. Age also played a factor, the data shows that 73% of people being hospitalized were 51 and older, the survey found.
Promote health. Save lives. Serve the vulnerable. Visit who.int Most of the hospitalizations have been concentrated in the city and surrounding suburbs, which have been hit hard by the pandemic, Cuomo added. There were 232 COVID-19 deaths and about 600 new coronavirus patients admitted into New York hospitals a day earlier, the governor said, indicating that the state’s hospitalization rate is trending downward. The data is important as the state looks toward reopening parts of the economy as the end of Cuomo’s strict stay-at-home order approaches and other states begin lifting restrictions. The state is working with former Mayor Michael Bloomberg on a tech-heavy approach to tracing cases and tracking the virus.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--‘Schiffing his Pants’: Transcripts clear Trump campaign on Russia collusion, raises serious question

‘Schiffing his Pants’: Transcripts clear Trump campaign on Russia collusion, raises serious questions about Schiff, sources say

Report : Sources say Russia probe transcripts show officials came up empty on collusion , may raise questions about Schiff .
Top law enforcement and intelligence officials affirmed they found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election , senior administration and intelligence community officials told Fox News on Wednesday , citing transcripts of House Intelligence Committee interviews that have been cleared for release .
Sara Carter is reporting that the Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell will release 53 declassified transcripts of witnesses who testified before Congress regarding the FBI ’ s Russia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign , which have been blocked for nearly a year by the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee , according to the letter obtained by SaraACarter.com .
Rep. Adam Schiff , D-CA , has refused to release the transcripts to the public , despite a unanimous vote by the committee to do so in the fall of 2018 .
Numerous sources , who have spoken to this reporter , have stated that Schiff ’ s refusal to release the transcripts is based on his fear that doing so will destroy his public credibility @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Grenell ’ s recent decision to threaten to make the documents public was first reported Wednesday by Byron York with The Washington Examiner .
Special Counsel was set up based on what they knew at the time was fake Democratic-funded opposition research .
Very difficult to trust anything that happened in this probe .
Our media , you 'll remember , forbade any criticism of probe as an attack on the republic .
Rep. Adam Schiff refuses to release transcripts from House Intel Committee investigation of foreign meddling .
However , the numerous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committee Chairman Adam Schiff ’ s past statements saying that there was “ direct evidence ” of collusion .
Schiff ’ s job was to ‘ spin ’ for FBI , intel community and Christopher Steele “ Schiff is in panic mode , ” a senior administration official told Fox News .
Click here for more on our top story .
Adam Schiff is desperately trying to hide these transcripts ( including mine ) from the American people .
Who do you think he ’ s trying to protect ?
Me or Susan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Andy McCabe ?
Special Counsel was set up based on what they knew at the time was fake Democratic-funded opposition research .
Very difficult to trust anything that happened in this probe .
Our media , you 'll remember , forbade any criticism of probe as an attack on the republic .
Adam Schiff may be the biggest loser of Russia probe declassification Review of Democratic House Intelligence Committee chairman ’ s public statements finds many contradicted , some linked to Russian disinformation .
In a packed hearing room two months into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rep. Adam Schiff played the willing protagonist by dramatically reading into the congressional record some of the most explosive claims from Christopher Steele ’ s dossier .
At the time , Steele ’ s dossier had recently burst on the scene , and the Trump White House was under siege as a far-reaching FBI investigation examined allegations — later disproven — that former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and others tried to collude with Russia to hijack the 2016 election .
“ According to Christopher Steele , a former British intelligence officer who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. intelligence , Russian sources tell him that Page has also had a secret meeting with Igor Sechin , CEO of Russian gas giant Rosneft , ” Schiff declared at a March 20 , 2017 House Intelligence Committee hearing .
“ Sechin is reported to be a former KGB agent and close friend of Putin ’ s .
According to Steele ’ s Russian sources , Page is offered brokerage fees by Sechin on a deal involving a 19 percent share of the company , ” the California Democrat added .
Schiff ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ read it into a government proceeding gave the document enhanced public credibility with the media , just weeks after it had been leaked to the news site Buzzfeed and before its funding origins and accuracy were determined .
Three years later , Schiff is the House Intelligence Committee chairman .
But his claims that day , and many others like it over the three years of the Russia scandal , have fallen into grave discredit , directly contradicted by intelligence evidence in recently declassified or released FBI and Justice Department memos and reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found .
For instance , Schiff claimed this about the Steele dossier in a Nov. 15 , 2017 interview with The Wall Street Journal : “ The bigger factor is how much of it can you corroborate and how much of it is true .
A lot of it has turned out to be true.
” By the time Schiff made that remark , the former FBI Director James Comey had publicly warned the dossier contained “ salacious and unverified material ” and the bureau ’ s own spreadsheet had shown the dossier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Justice Department memos show .
Significant errors or contradictions with Steele ’ s sources had been flagged already by January 2017 .
“ Despite the FBI ’ s efforts to corroborate and evaluate the Steele election reporting , we were told by [ an FBI employee ] that , as of September 2017 , the FBI had corroborated limited information in the Steele election reporting , and much of that information was publicly available .
Most relevant to the Carter Page FISA applications , the specific substantive allegations contained in Reports 80 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which were relied upon in all four FISA applications , remained uncorroborated and , in several instances , were inconsistent with information gathered by the team , ” Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz wrote in his December report .
More recently declassified memos show Steele was far from being held in “ high regard ” as Schiff claimed at the hearing : By March 2017 , the FBI had already terminated Steele for leaking ( November 2016 ) , been warned he was susceptible to Russian disinformation ( 2015 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extreme bias against Trump ( August 2016 ) .
And Steele ’ s primary sub-source had disputed to the FBI facts attributed to him in the dossier , warning that Steele ’ s claim about the Page meeting with Sechin was inaccurate and fed to him by someone connected to Russia intelligence , raising the distinct concern it was disinformation .
“ The Primary Sub-source told the FBI that one of his/her sub-sources furnished information for that part of Report 134 through a text message , but said that the sub-source never stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Page , ” Inspector General Horowitz reported .
In a recently declassified footnote , Horowitz added : “ The Primary Sub-Source also told the FBI at these interviews that the sub-source who provided the information about the Carter Page-Sechin meeting had connections to Russian Intelligence Services ( RIS ) .
” At that same March hearing , Schiff pushed another Steele dossier claim .
“ According to Steele ’ s Russian sources , the Trump campaign is offered documents damaging to Hillary Clinton , which the Russians would publish through an outlet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” But like much of the information in the dossier , the FBI found the claim did not stand up when they interviewed Steele ’ s alleged sources .
“ The Primary Sub-source said , among other things , that he/she had only one , 10- to 15-minute telephone call with someone he/she believed was Person 1 and did not recall any discussion or mention of WikiLeaks , ” Horowitz reported .
“ … His/her statement that he/she did not recall any discussion or mention of WikiLeaks during the telephone call was inconsistent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s claims that directly conflict with public evidence today were introduced in formal congressional proceedings .
For instance , here are three claims in Schiff ’ s Jan. 29 , 2018 minority Democratic memo on the House Intelligence Committee ’ s Russia probe and the conflicting evidence : Schiff Report Claim : “ FBI and DOJ officials did not abuse the FISA process , omit material information , or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump campaign .
… DOJ met the rigor , transparency , and evidentiary basis needed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requirement.
” Declassified Facts : Horowitz told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Dec. 11 , 2019 , “ I do not think the Department of Justice fairly treated these FISAs.
” His report went even further in describing how the FBI violated its own rules in submitting four FISA applications with a total of 51 pieces of unverified , inaccurate or false information .
“ FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘ scrupulously accurate , ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate , incomplete , or unsupported by appropriate documentation.
” The FISAs were so flawed in fact that DOJ has formally withdrawn two of the applications from the court in their entirety because they were incontrovertibly inaccurate .
Schiff Report Claim : DOJ and FBI officials “ made only narrow use of information from Steele ’ s sources about Page ’ s specific activities in 2016.
” Declassified Facts : Horowitz directly contradicted this claim , concluding the dossier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in the FISA application .
“ The FISA request form drew almost entirely from Steele ’ s reporting in describing the factual basis to establish probable cause to believe that Page was an agent of a foreign power , ” the IG wrote .
Declassified Facts : “ We found that the FBI did not have information corroborating the specific allegations against Carter Page in Steele ’ s reporting when it relied upon his reports in the first FISA application or subsequent renewal applications , ” Horowitz reported in December .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s early embrace of the Steele dossier came only recently , when footnotes declassified from the Horowitz report showed the U.S. intelligence community first warned that Steele was susceptible to Russian disinformation starting in 2015 and by early 2017 had specific information in his dossier traced to Russian Intelligence Services ( RIS ) .
“ We identified reporting the Crossfire Hurricane team received from [ REDACTED ] indicating the potential for Russian disinformation influencing Steele ’ s election reporting , ” Horowitz wrote in one explosive footnote .
“ A January 12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ REDACTED ] outlining an inaccuracy in a limited subset of Steele ’ s reporting about the activities of Michael Cohen .
The [ REDACTED ] stated that it did not have high confidence in this subset of Steele ’ s reporting and assessed that the referenced subset was part of a Russian disinformation campaign to denigrate U.S. foreign relations .
“ A second report from the same [ REDACTED ] five days later stated that a person named in the limited subset of Steele ’ s reporting had denied representations in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the person ’ s denials were truthful , ” the footnote added .
“ A USIC report dated February 27 , 2017 , contained information about an individual with reported connections to Trump and Russia who claimed that the public reporting about the details of Trump ’ s sexual activities in Moscow during a trip in 2013 were false , and that they were the product of RIS ‘ infiltrating a source into the network ’ ” of Steele .
Those four red flags about Russian intelligence dirty tricks in the Steele @ @ @ @ @ @ @ community before Schiff read parts of the document into the congressional record .
Schiff ’ s claims on his many television and media appearance during the early days of the Russia collusion narrative have also aged poorly .
In early February 2017 , Schiff fanned the narrative that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn may have sought to undercut President Obama ’ s sanctions on Russia during a phone call with the Russian ambassador and should be prosecuted under the Logan Act .
“ Trump ’ s team , through Flynn , reaches @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says , ‘ Don ’ t worry about those sanctions .
We ’ re going to take care of business .
We ’ re not going to bite the hand that fed us.
’ That ’ s something that needs to be investigated .
That ’ s hugely consequential , ” Schiff told The Atlantic magazine in a Feb. 14 , 2017 .
By the time Schiff uttered those words , the FBI agent who had investigated Flynn ’ s contacts with Russia had already concluded on Jan. 4 , 2017 that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Flynn ’ s contacts and recommended closing down the case , according to recently declassified FBI memos .
File FBIFlynnCaseCloseMemo.pdf And recently declassified documents from Special Counsel Robert Mueller ’ s probe show that the FBI had informed DOJ by late January 2017 that Flynn was not acting as an agent of Russia .
Likewise , the main prosecutor for national security cases inside the Justice Department , Mary McCord , and others thought prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act was unlikely or a “ long shot ” after reading Flynn ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conversation with the Russian ambassador , the memos show .
“ McCord said that upon learning of Flynn ’ s phone calls with Ambassador Kislyak , a Logan Act prosecution seemed like a stretch to her , ” the Mueller summary of her interview stated .
And a top FBI official ’ s handwritten notes expressed concern the bureau ’ s treatment of Flynn amounted to “ playing games ” and appeared to involve an effort to get him into an interview where he might so he could prosecuted or fired .
Once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DOJ , FBI and the intelligence community had already dismissed .
Schiff , whose office has repeatedly declined to respond to request for comment from Just the News , has publicly defended his comments on Steele and Russia collusion by saying : “ There is already , in my view , ample evidence in the public domain on the issue of collusion if you ’ re willing to see it.
” History will judge Schiff ’ s claims by the final weight of facts , and there are many more declassifications to come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Director of National Intelligence informed Schiff this week it may release transcripts of 53 interviews the House Intelligence Committee did with Russia case figures .
But there is already ample evidence to show that the Steele dossier that the House Intelligence Committee chairman so readily embraced and read into the congressional record was , in fact , erroneous , uncorroborated and tainted by Russian intelligence efforts to inject misinformation .
Many of Schiff ’ s other claims have , likewise , crumbled under the weight of facts now in the public record @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Schiff ’ s conservative critics intend to make him pay a political price for his past words , as Rep. Jim Jordan and other House GOP colleagues made clear in a letter this week urging the House Intelligence Committee chairman to release the interview transcripts .
“ For almost four years , prominent Democrat politicians and commentators alleged that President Trump colluded with Russia , with Chairman Schiff going so far as to say that he had ‘ direct evidence ’ of collusion , ” the lawmakers wrote .
“ Now that these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the American people deserve to have transparency about why public figures such as Chairman Schiff continued to promote such wild accusations .
”

Report: Sources say Russia probe transcripts show officials came up empty on collusion, may raise questions about Schiff. Top law enforcement and intelligence officials affirmed they found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election, senior administration and intelligence community officials told Fox News on Wednesday, citing transcripts of House Intelligence Committee interviews that have been cleared for release.
Sara Carter is reporting that the Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell will release 53 declassified transcripts of witnesses who testified before Congress regarding the FBI’s Russia probe into President Donald Trump and his campaign, which have been blocked for nearly a year by the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, according to the letter obtained by SaraACarter.com.
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-CA, has refused to release the transcripts to the public, despite a unanimous vote by the committee to do so in the fall of 2018. Numerous sources, who have spoken to this reporter, have stated that Schiff’s refusal to release the transcripts is based on his fear that doing so will destroy his public credibility in pushing the Russia hoax propaganda. Grenell’s recent decision to threaten to make the documents public was first reported Wednesday by Byron York with The Washington Examiner.
Special Counsel was set up based on what they knew at the time was fake Democratic-funded opposition research. Very difficult to trust anything that happened in this probe. Our media, you'll remember, forbade any criticism of probe as an attack on the republic.
Rep. Adam Schiff refuses to release transcripts from House Intel Committee investigation of foreign meddling. However, the numerous transcribed interviews could raise further questions about committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s past statements saying that there was “direct evidence” of collusion.
Schiff’s job was to ‘spin’ for FBI, intel community and Christopher Steele
“Schiff is in panic mode,” a senior administration official told Fox News. Click here for more on our top story.
Adam Schiff is desperately trying to hide these transcripts (including mine) from the American people. Who do you think he’s trying to protect? Me or Susan Rice, Samantha Power, Sally Yates and Andy McCabe?
Special Counsel was set up based on what they knew at the time was fake Democratic-funded opposition research. Very difficult to trust anything that happened in this probe. Our media, you'll remember, forbade any criticism of probe as an attack on the republic.
Adam Schiff may be the biggest loser of Russia probe declassification
Review of Democratic House Intelligence Committee chairman’s public statements finds many contradicted, some linked to Russian disinformation.
By John Solomon, May 6, 2020:
In a packed hearing room two months into Donald Trump’s embattled presidency, Rep. Adam Schiff played the willing protagonist by dramatically reading into the congressional record some of the most explosive claims from Christopher Steele’s dossier.
At the time, Steele’s dossier had recently burst on the scene, and the Trump White House was under siege as a far-reaching FBI investigation examined allegations — later disproven — that former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and others tried to collude with Russia to hijack the 2016 election.
“According to Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer who is reportedly held in high regard by U.S. intelligence, Russian sources tell him that Page has also had a secret meeting with Igor Sechin, CEO of Russian gas giant Rosneft,” Schiff declared at a March 20, 2017 House Intelligence Committee hearing.
“Sechin is reported to be a former KGB agent and close friend of Putin’s. According to Steele’s Russian sources, Page is offered brokerage fees by Sechin on a deal involving a 19 percent share of the company,” the California Democrat added.
Schiff’s decision to embrace the dossier and read it into a government proceeding gave the document enhanced public credibility with the media, just weeks after it had been leaked to the news site Buzzfeed and before its funding origins and accuracy were determined.
Three years later, Schiff is the House Intelligence Committee chairman. But his claims that day, and many others like it over the three years of the Russia scandal, have fallen into grave discredit, directly contradicted by intelligence evidence in recently declassified or released FBI and Justice Department memos and reports, a Just the News review has found.
For instance, Schiff claimed this about the Steele dossier in a Nov. 15, 2017 interview with The Wall Street Journal: “The bigger factor is how much of it can you corroborate and how much of it is true. A lot of it has turned out to be true.”
By the time Schiff made that remark, the former FBI Director James Comey had publicly warned the dossier contained “salacious and unverified material” and the bureau’s own spreadsheet had shown the dossier possessed several errors and mostly uncorroborated evidence, Justice Department memos show. Significant errors or contradictions with Steele’s sources had been flagged already by January 2017.
“Despite the FBI’s efforts to corroborate and evaluate the Steele election reporting, we were told by [an FBI employee] that, as of September 2017, the FBI had corroborated limited information in the Steele election reporting, and much of that information was publicly available. Most relevant to the Carter Page FISA applications, the specific substantive allegations contained in Reports 80, 94, 95, and 102, which were relied upon in all four FISA applications, remained uncorroborated and, in several instances, were inconsistent with information gathered by the team,” Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz wrote in his December report.
More recently declassified memos show Steele was far from being held in “high regard” as Schiff claimed at the hearing: By March 2017, the FBI had already terminated Steele for leaking (November 2016), been warned he was susceptible to Russian disinformation (2015), and been told he had an extreme bias against Trump (August 2016).
And Steele’s primary sub-source had disputed to the FBI facts attributed to him in the dossier, warning that Steele’s claim about the Page meeting with Sechin was inaccurate and fed to him by someone connected to Russia intelligence, raising the distinct concern it was disinformation.
“The Primary Sub-source told the FBI that one of his/her sub-sources furnished information for that part of Report 134 through a text message, but said that the sub-source never stated that Sechin had offered a brokerage interest to Page,” Inspector General Horowitz reported.
In a recently declassified footnote, Horowitz added: “The Primary Sub-Source also told the FBI at these interviews that the sub-source who provided the information about the Carter Page-Sechin meeting had connections to Russian Intelligence Services (RIS).”
04-15-20_ODNI_Declassified_Footnotes_20-00337_Unclassified.pdf
At that same March hearing, Schiff pushed another Steele dossier claim. “According to Steele’s Russian sources, the Trump campaign is offered documents damaging to Hillary Clinton, which the Russians would publish through an outlet that gives them deniability, like Wikileaks.”
But like much of the information in the dossier, the FBI found the claim did not stand up when they interviewed Steele’s alleged sources.
“The Primary Sub-source said, among other things, that he/she had only one, 10- to 15-minute telephone call with someone he/she believed was Person 1 and did not recall any discussion or mention of WikiLeaks,” Horowitz reported. “… His/her statement that he/she did not recall any discussion or mention of WikiLeaks during the telephone call was inconsistent with those allegations.”
Many of Schiff’s claims that directly conflict with public evidence today were introduced in formal congressional proceedings.
For instance, here are three claims in Schiff’s Jan. 29, 2018 minority Democratic memo on the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia probe and the conflicting evidence:
Schiff Report Claim: “FBI and DOJ officials did not abuse the FISA process, omit material information, or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump campaign. … DOJ met the rigor, transparency, and evidentiary basis needed to meet FISA’s probable cause requirement.”
Declassified Facts: Horowitz told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Dec. 11, 2019, “I do not think the Department of Justice fairly treated these FISAs.” His report went even further in describing how the FBI violated its own rules in submitting four FISA applications with a total of 51 pieces of unverified, inaccurate or false information. “FBI personnel fell far short of the requirement in FBI policy that they ensure that all factual statements in a FISA application are ‘scrupulously accurate,’” he wrote. “We identified multiple instances in which factual assertions relied upon in the first FISA application were inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported by appropriate documentation.” The FISAs were so flawed in fact that DOJ has formally withdrawn two of the applications from the court in their entirety because they were incontrovertibly inaccurate.
Schiff Report Claim: DOJ and FBI officials “made only narrow use of information from Steele’s sources about Page’s specific activities in 2016.”
Declassified Facts: Horowitz directly contradicted this claim, concluding the dossier “played a central and essential role” in the FISA application. “The FISA request form drew almost entirely from Steele’s reporting in describing the factual basis to establish probable cause to believe that Page was an agent of a foreign power,” the IG wrote.
Schiff Report Claim: “DOJ provided additional information obtained through multiple independent sources that corroborated Steele’s reporting.”
Declassified Facts: “We found that the FBI did not have information corroborating the specific allegations against Carter Page in Steele’s reporting when it relied upon his reports in the first FISA application or subsequent renewal applications,” Horowitz reported in December.
One of the revelations that most undercuts Schiff’s early embrace of the Steele dossier came only recently, when footnotes declassified from the Horowitz report showed the U.S. intelligence community first warned that Steele was susceptible to Russian disinformation starting in 2015 and by early 2017 had specific information in his dossier traced to Russian Intelligence Services (RIS).
“We identified reporting the Crossfire Hurricane team received from [REDACTED] indicating the potential for Russian disinformation influencing Steele’s election reporting,” Horowitz wrote in one explosive footnote. “A January 12, 2017, report relayed information from [REDACTED] outlining an inaccuracy in a limited subset of Steele’s reporting about the activities of Michael Cohen. The [REDACTED] stated that it did not have high confidence in this subset of Steele’s reporting and assessed that the referenced subset was part of a Russian disinformation campaign to denigrate U.S. foreign relations.
“A second report from the same [REDACTED] five days later stated that a person named in the limited subset of Steele’s reporting had denied representations in the reporting and the [REDACTED] assessed that the person’s denials were truthful,” the footnote added. “A USIC report dated February 27, 2017, contained information about an individual with reported connections to Trump and Russia who claimed that the public reporting about the details of Trump’s sexual activities in Moscow during a trip in 2013 were false, and that they were the product of RIS ‘infiltrating a source into the network’” of Steele.
Those four red flags about Russian intelligence dirty tricks in the Steele dossier all were reported inside the intelligence community before Schiff read parts of the document into the congressional record.
Schiff’s claims on his many television and media appearance during the early days of the Russia collusion narrative have also aged poorly.
In early February 2017, Schiff fanned the narrative that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn may have sought to undercut President Obama’s sanctions on Russia during a phone call with the Russian ambassador and should be prosecuted under the Logan Act.
“Trump’s team, through Flynn, reaches out to the Russian ambassador and potentially says, ‘Don’t worry about those sanctions. We’re going to take care of business. We’re not going to bite the hand that fed us.’ That’s something that needs to be investigated. That’s hugely consequential,” Schiff told The Atlantic magazine in a Feb. 14, 2017.
By the time Schiff uttered those words, the FBI agent who had investigated Flynn’s contacts with Russia had already concluded on Jan. 4, 2017 that there was “no derogatory information” about Flynn’s contacts and recommended closing down the case, according to recently declassified FBI memos.
File
FBIFlynnCaseCloseMemo.pdf
And recently declassified documents from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe show that the FBI had informed DOJ by late January 2017 that Flynn was not acting as an agent of Russia. Likewise, the main prosecutor for national security cases inside the Justice Department, Mary McCord, and others thought prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act was unlikely or a “long shot” after reading Flynn’s actual words from a transcript of his conversation with the Russian ambassador, the memos show.
“McCord said that upon learning of Flynn’s phone calls with Ambassador Kislyak, a Logan Act prosecution seemed like a stretch to her,” the Mueller summary of her interview stated.
And a top FBI official’s handwritten notes expressed concern the bureau’s treatment of Flynn amounted to “playing games” and appeared to involve an effort to get him into an interview where he might so he could prosecuted or fired.
Once again, Schiff was peddling claims that DOJ, FBI and the intelligence community had already dismissed.
Schiff, whose office has repeatedly declined to respond to request for comment from Just the News, has publicly defended his comments on Steele and Russia collusion by saying: “There is already, in my view, ample evidence in the public domain on the issue of collusion if you’re willing to see it.”
History will judge Schiff’s claims by the final weight of facts, and there are many more declassifications to come in the Russia case. The Office of Director of National Intelligence informed Schiff this week it may release transcripts of 53 interviews the House Intelligence Committee did with Russia case figures.
But there is already ample evidence to show that the Steele dossier that the House Intelligence Committee chairman so readily embraced and read into the congressional record was, in fact, erroneous, uncorroborated and tainted by Russian intelligence efforts to inject misinformation.
Many of Schiff’s other claims have, likewise, crumbled under the weight of facts now in the public record.
And there is growing evidence that Schiff’s conservative critics intend to make him pay a political price for his past words, as Rep. Jim Jordan and other House GOP colleagues made clear in a letter this week urging the House Intelligence Committee chairman to release the interview transcripts.
“For almost four years, prominent Democrat politicians and commentators alleged that President Trump colluded with Russia, with Chairman Schiff going so far as to say that he had ‘direct evidence’ of collusion,” the lawmakers wrote.
“Now that these allegations have been disproven by several investigations, the American people deserve to have transparency about why public figures such as Chairman Schiff continued to promote such wild accusations.”


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--Democrat San Francisco gives free drugs, booze to homeless quarantining in hotels

They obviously have their priorities straight .
They expect us to bail out these cesspools of corruption ?
The Democrats are wielding corona like a club , destroying everything in their path .
Photo above : The Abigail Hotel , where some homeless people are quarantining in San Francisco .
San Francisco gives free drugs , alcohol to homeless quarantining in hotels San Francisco is giving free drugs and alcohol to some homeless people isolating inside city-rented hotels during the coronavirus pandemic , officials confirmed Wednesday .
The city has handed out either booze , tobacco or medical cannabis to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them from leaving the hotels and potentially spreading coronavirus , Jenna Lane , a spokeswoman for the city ’ s Department of Health , told the San Francisco Chronicle .
“ They ’ re doing San Francisco a great service by staying inside , ” Lane told the paper .
“ We ’ re saying , ‘ We ’ re doing what we can to support you staying inside and not have to go out and get these things.
’ ” The approach is part of a city “ harm reduction based practice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the health department said on Twitter .
San Francisco is using hotels to house a total of 270 homeless people who have either tested positive for the coronavirus or are highly susceptible to infection .
They also usually have no place of their own to properly quarantine , the report said .
The measure uses “ the best evidence to help people manage their addictions , ” the city ’ s health director , Dr. Grant Colfax , said at a Wednesday press conference .
“ In some cases , this will include @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use so they can stay safe and in-place as much as possible to help their communities and help themselves.
” The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

They obviously have their priorities straight. They expect us to bail out these cesspools of corruption?
The Democrats are wielding corona like a club, destroying everything in their path.
Photo above: The Abigail Hotel, where some homeless people are quarantining in San Francisco.
San Francisco gives free drugs, alcohol to homeless quarantining in hotels By Kenneth Garger | NY Post May 6, 2020 | San Francisco is giving free drugs and alcohol to some homeless people isolating inside city-rented hotels during the coronavirus pandemic, officials confirmed Wednesday. The city has handed out either booze, tobacco or medical cannabis to 43 homeless people with addictions to deter them from leaving the hotels and potentially spreading coronavirus, Jenna Lane, a spokeswoman for the city’s Department of Health, told the San Francisco Chronicle. “They’re doing San Francisco a great service by staying inside,” Lane told the paper. “We’re saying, ‘We’re doing what we can to support you staying inside and not have to go out and get these things.’ ” The approach is part of a city “harm reduction based practice” not funded with taxpayer money, the health department said on Twitter. San Francisco is using hotels to house a total of 270 homeless people who have either tested positive for the coronavirus or are highly susceptible to infection. They also usually have no place of their own to properly quarantine, the report said. The measure uses “the best evidence to help people manage their addictions,” the city’s health director, Dr. Grant Colfax, said at a Wednesday press conference. “In some cases, this will include helping them manage their alcohol and nicotine use so they can stay safe and in-place as much as possible to help their communities and help themselves.”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-07--Illinois: Democrat Governor Closes Churches For A Year

If you are operating under the delusion that this is about your safety , you deserve to lose your freedoms .
This is a war on your rights .
Period .
The government no longer derives its authority from the consent of the governed , but like all totalitarian states , has seized it .
Illinois governor says churches may not reopen for a year or more because of coronavirus by Madison Dibble | Washington Examiner | May 06 , 2020 06:39 PM It could be more than a year before churches are allowed to resume their in-person gatherings , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pritzker .
Pritzker announced a five-phase plan to reopen Illinois that gives guidance to schools , businesses , churches , and other religious centers about when they will be allowed to reopen .
In phase three , gatherings of up to 10 people will be allowed .
In phase four , gatherings of up to 50 people will be allowed .
Gatherings of more than 50 people will not be allowed until phase five .
During a press conference on Wednesday , Pritzker confirmed that churches will be held to the same standards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ services of more than 50 people until phase five , even if it takes more than a year to get to that position .
“ You know , that in phase three , there can be gatherings , church gatherings , of 10 or fewer .
In phase four , 50 or fewer .
So that ’ s the guidance that ’ s been given to me , ” Pritzker said .
“ I ’ m not the one providing that guidance .
It really is what the scientists and epidemiologists are recommending.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ two on Friday and will enter phase three on May 29 at the earliest .
Face masks will be recommended in public until phase five is reached .
Schools , restaurants , and bars will not reopen until phase four .
Phase five can not begin until a vaccine is widely available or a highly effective therapeutic drug is released .
Dr. Anthony Fauci , the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , has said a vaccine is 12 to 18 months away from being available to the public @

If you are operating under the delusion that this is about your safety, you deserve to lose your freedoms. This is a war on your rights. Period. The government no longer derives its authority from the consent of the governed, but like all totalitarian states, has seized it.
Illinois governor says churches may not reopen for a year or more because of coronavirus
by Madison Dibble | Washington Examiner | May 06, 2020 06:39 PM
It could be more than a year before churches are allowed to resume their in-person gatherings, according to Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker.
Pritzker announced a five-phase plan to reopen Illinois that gives guidance to schools, businesses, churches, and other religious centers about when they will be allowed to reopen. In phase three, gatherings of up to 10 people will be allowed. In phase four, gatherings of up to 50 people will be allowed. Gatherings of more than 50 people will not be allowed until phase five.
During a press conference on Wednesday, Pritzker confirmed that churches will be held to the same standards and not be allowed to hold in-person services of more than 50 people until phase five, even if it takes more than a year to get to that position.
“You know, that in phase three, there can be gatherings, church gatherings, of 10 or fewer. In phase four, 50 or fewer. So that’s the guidance that’s been given to me,” Pritzker said. “I’m not the one providing that guidance. It really is what the scientists and epidemiologists are recommending.”
Pritzker said the state entered phase two on Friday and will enter phase three on May 29 at the earliest. Face masks will be recommended in public until phase five is reached. Schools, restaurants, and bars will not reopen until phase four.
Phase five cannot begin until a vaccine is widely available or a highly effective therapeutic drug is released. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has said a vaccine is 12 to 18 months away from being available to the public.