pamelagellerreport--2020-05-08--Clearing Flynn Should Also Help Clear the Air in the Election

Clearing Flynn Should Also Help Clear the Air in the Election Editorial of The New York Sun | May 7 , 2020 America ’ s motion to dismiss the criminal charges it had handed up against General Michael Flynn strikes us as more than a vindication of President Trump ’ s former national security adviser .
It ’ s also an important step toward a long-overdue acceptance of the results of the 2016 election .
We ’ d like to think it will help clear the air as Americans prepare to go to the polls again five months hence .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ General Flynn had lied to the FBI were not exactly a surprise .
It had become increasingly clear that no charges would have been handed up save for the maneuvering by a cabal within the Justice Department that had been horrified at the election results .
This had been thrown into sharp relief by evidence shockingly withheld from the defense ( and public ) .
That this was brought into the open is largely due to the courage and tenacity of Attorney General Barr .
He had assigned a review of , among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The results on General Flynn are sketched in a motion to dismiss , signed by the interim United States attorney for the Columbia District , Timothy Shea .
It paints a devastating portrait of the general trapped into pleading guilty to a crime of which he shouldn ’ t been charged .
How the court will handle the motion is not , at least to us , entirely clear .
It looks to us , though , like there is no longer an actual case or controversy between America and General Flynn .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ power extends only to deciding actual cases and controversies..
So the court may well grant the government ’ s motion .
It can ’ t come soon enough , with the election bearing down .
That would leave the question as to why the Deep State so feared a Trump presidency in the first place .
Our occasional contributor , Michael Ledeen , who co-authored with General Flynn a book about the global war against radical Islamist terrorism , tells us that the general was planning to bring in new staff to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accurate budget of clandestine spending ” going back to the dawn of the Cold War .
That , Mr. Ledeen tells us , had never been done by either of the Democratic or Republican establishments that Mr. Trump upended in the 2016 election .
It strikes us as a logical project for a president who ran against endless wars .
Mr. Trump himself reacted bluntly to the vindication of General Flynn , saying that the general was “ targeted by the Obama administration ” and that “ he was targeted to take down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to think of a moment quite like it .
Today ’ s events will no doubt trigger a frantic backlash in the Democratic press .
It will be hard , though , for the left to gainsay the bona fides of the prosecutor , Jeffrey Jensen , whom Attorney General Barr had put on the case and who recommend dropping the charges , .
Mr. Jensen first became a federal prosecutor in Missouri under President Clinton .
It is a coincidence , no doubt , that all this came to a head on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court — in a unanimous decision — threw out the criminal convictions in the so-called Bridgegate scandal in New Jersey .
The Wall Street Journal calls it a “ blow against criminalizing politics.
” It ’ s encouraging that the Nine acted unanimously — a good signal for those who want to keep using criminal law to hamstring the President for political and ideological reasons .

America better be paying attention.
Clearing Flynn Should Also Help Clear the Air in the Election
Editorial of The New York Sun | May 7, 2020
America’s motion to dismiss the criminal charges it had handed up against General Michael Flynn strikes us as more than a vindication of President Trump’s former national security adviser. It’s also an important step toward a long-overdue acceptance of the results of the 2016 election. We’d like to think it will help clear the air as Americans prepare to go to the polls again five months hence.
The move to drop the charges that General Flynn had lied to the FBI were not exactly a surprise. It had become increasingly clear that no charges would have been handed up save for the maneuvering by a cabal within the Justice Department that had been horrified at the election results. This had been thrown into sharp relief by evidence shockingly withheld from the defense (and public).
That this was brought into the open is largely due to the courage and tenacity of Attorney General Barr. He had assigned a review of, among other matters, the Flynn case. The results on General Flynn are sketched in a motion to dismiss, signed by the interim United States attorney for the Columbia District, Timothy Shea. It paints a devastating portrait of the general trapped into pleading guilty to a crime of which he shouldn’t been charged.
How the court will handle the motion is not, at least to us, entirely clear. It looks to us, though, like there is no longer an actual case or controversy between America and General Flynn. Under the Constitution, our courts’ power extends only to deciding actual cases and controversies.. So the court may well grant the government’s motion. It can’t come soon enough, with the election bearing down.
That would leave the question as to why the Deep State so feared a Trump presidency in the first place. Our occasional contributor, Michael Ledeen, who co-authored with General Flynn a book about the global war against radical Islamist terrorism, tells us that the general was planning to bring in new staff to the NSC and to produce “the first accurate budget of clandestine spending” going back to the dawn of the Cold War.
That, Mr. Ledeen tells us, had never been done by either of the Democratic or Republican establishments that Mr. Trump upended in the 2016 election. It strikes us as a logical project for a president who ran against endless wars. Mr. Trump himself reacted bluntly to the vindication of General Flynn, saying that the general was “targeted by the Obama administration” and that “he was targeted to take down a president.”
It’s hard to think of a moment quite like it. Today’s events will no doubt trigger a frantic backlash in the Democratic press. It will be hard, though, for the left to gainsay the bona fides of the prosecutor, Jeffrey Jensen, whom Attorney General Barr had put on the case and who recommend dropping the charges,. Mr. Jensen first became a federal prosecutor in Missouri under President Clinton.
It is a coincidence, no doubt, that all this came to a head on the same day that the United States Supreme Court — in a unanimous decision — threw out the criminal convictions in the so-called Bridgegate scandal in New Jersey. The Wall Street Journal calls it a “blow against criminalizing politics.” It’s encouraging that the Nine acted unanimously — a good signal for those who want to keep using criminal law to hamstring the President for political and ideological reasons.


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-08--“Palestinian” Authority hiding terrorist salaries from donor countries in financial reports

The anti-Semitic Democrat Party insist that this neo-Nazi terrorist organization should be rewarded a state .
The depraved Joe Biden will give these savages your hard earned money if he is elected POTUS .
Jewish Americans must run from the Democrat Party !
.
PA hiding terrorist salaries from donor countries in financial reports In 2018 and 2019 the salary payments appeared in the PA ’ s Budget Performance Reports , but this year they have disappeared , while spending on the PLO has shot up .
Monthly budget documents prepared by the Palestinian Authority for 2020 show that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pays terrorists from international donors , making a sham of its commitment to financial transparency .
The PA receives hundreds of millions of dollars annually from donor countries around the world and is therefore obliged to produce fully transparent financial records , with all expenses listed , for the benefit of its donors .
However , its “ pay to slay ” scheme , which pays terrorists a monthly stipend , likely falls foul of international law , leaving it unable to openly declare the payments within its budget .
Consequently , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has found that the PA is diverting the payments through the Palestine Liberation Organization ( PLO ) , a trick it has used in the past .
“ Ever since PMW notified the donor countries that the PA is paying salaries to terrorist prisoners with their money , the PA has been doing everything it can to confuse the donors , ” Itamar Marcus , director of the media watchdog .
“ In 2014 , the PA closed the PA Ministry of Prisoners ’ Affairs , and in 2015 it created the PLO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2018 , it reopened the PA Ministry of Prisoners ’ Affairs and in 2019 it changed its name to the Commission for Detainees ’ Affairs .
Now in 2020 , it is trying to hide its payments by moving them once again from the PA to the PLO.
” Detailed analysis of the PA ’ s Budget Performance Reports shows that in 2018 , the PA spent NIS 736 million financing the Ministry of Prisoners ’ Affairs .
The following year the Authority spent a further NIS 619m .
financing the Commission for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 517m .
was spent on terrorists ’ salaries .
In the 2020 reports , however , neither organization is listed , but the monies paid to the PLO have increased significantly , from just over NIS 400m .
to more than NIS 700m .
In late April , the World Bank warned that the PA faced a $ 1 billion budget deficit this year as donor payments contracted , partly as a response to the coronavirus pandemic .
The authority itself put the shortfall at closer to $ 1.4 billion , and announced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public servant payments in March to ensure that all payments were met .

The anti-Semitic Democrat Party insist that this neo-Nazi terrorist organization should be rewarded a state. The depraved Joe Biden will give these savages your hard earned money if he is elected POTUS. Jewish Americans must run from the Democrat Party!.
PA hiding terrorist salaries from donor countries in financial reports
In 2018 and 2019 the salary payments appeared in the PA’s Budget Performance Reports, but this year they have disappeared, while spending on the PLO has shot up.
By Jerusalem Post, May 7, 2020
Monthly budget documents prepared by the Palestinian Authority for 2020 show that it is attempting to hide the salaries it pays terrorists from international donors, making a sham of its commitment to financial transparency.
The PA receives hundreds of millions of dollars annually from donor countries around the world and is therefore obliged to produce fully transparent financial records, with all expenses listed, for the benefit of its donors. However, its “pay to slay” scheme, which pays terrorists a monthly stipend, likely falls foul of international law, leaving it unable to openly declare the payments within its budget.
Consequently, the NGO Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) has found that the PA is diverting the payments through the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), a trick it has used in the past.
“Ever since PMW notified the donor countries that the PA is paying salaries to terrorist prisoners with their money, the PA has been doing everything it can to confuse the donors,” Itamar Marcus, director of the media watchdog.
“In 2014, the PA closed the PA Ministry of Prisoners’ Affairs, and in 2015 it created the PLO Commission of Prisoners’ Affairs. In 2018, it reopened the PA Ministry of Prisoners’ Affairs and in 2019 it changed its name to the Commission for Detainees’ Affairs. Now in 2020, it is trying to hide its payments by moving them once again from the PA to the PLO.”
Detailed analysis of the PA’s Budget Performance Reports shows that in 2018, the PA spent NIS 736 million financing the Ministry of Prisoners’ Affairs. The following year the Authority spent a further NIS 619m. financing the Commission for Detainees’ Affairs, of which NIS 517m. was spent on terrorists’ salaries. In the 2020 reports, however, neither organization is listed, but the monies paid to the PLO have increased significantly, from just over NIS 400m. to more than NIS 700m.
In late April, the World Bank warned that the PA faced a $1 billion budget deficit this year as donor payments contracted, partly as a response to the coronavirus pandemic. The authority itself put the shortfall at closer to $1.4 billion, and announced that it would be staggering social and public servant payments in March to ensure that all payments were met.


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-08--WSJ: The Vindication of Michael Flynn

WSJ: The Vindication of Michael Flynn

Must reading for readers who think this couldn ’ t happen in America .
Justice drops its prosecution with new evidence about the FBI .
The Justice Department dropped its case against Michael Flynn on Thursday , “ with prejudice , ” in a legal filing that should echo far beyond this tragedy of justice delayed .
The latest evidence further undermines the credibility of James Comey ’ s FBI , special counsel Robert Mueller , and the entire “ Russia collusion ” investigation .
The retired Army general had initially pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two agents interviewed him at the White House shortly after he took over as Donald Trump ’ s national security adviser .
But he later reversed his plea as new information emerged that the FBI may have tried to entrap him .
The documents filed on Thursday in federal court vindicate the general ’ s reversal .
Justice said the FBI ’ s interview of Mr. Flynn was “ untethered to , and unjustified by , the FBI ’ s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn , ” and that the interview was not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” We recommend the filing for readers who think this couldn ’ t happen in America .
The filing recounts how the FBI had concluded in late 2016 that there was no evidence that Mr. Flynn had colluded with Russia .
But the FBI kept the investigation open after it received a transcript of Mr. Flynn ’ s conversation with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. Mr. Comey and his loyalists then set up Mr. Flynn in an interview despite having no legal basis .
The documents show that Mr. Comey told his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ general counsel of the visit and not to tell the White House about his conversation with the ambassador .
They also show that Mr. Comey worked around senior Justice officials , including Acting Attorney General Sally Yates , who thought the White House should be informed .
As he did with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Hillary Clinton ’ s emails , Mr. Comey acted as if he was a law unto himself .
At the time the agents admitted they did not think Mr. Flynn was lying to them .
But as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legitimate investigative purpose , whether Mr. Flynn was lying was immaterial .
He should never have been prosecuted .
Yet Mr. Mueller , who knew all this soon after becoming special counsel , pursued Mr. Flynn , threatening him and his son with ruin until he got the guilty plea .
The prosecutor on the case , Brandon Van Grack , was part of Mr. Mueller ’ s team and consistently denied there was relevant material the government had not turned over to the defense .
But surely the lack of a legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr. Van Grack told the court Thursday he is withdrawing from the case , but an investigation is warranted to see if he lied to the court .
Mr. Mueller ’ s reputation also stands self-besmirched , and the entire Russia collusion probe looks even more illegitimate and political .
All of this came to light after Attorney General Bill Barr assigned another U.S. Attorney , Jeffrey Jensen , to look at the Flynn case anew .
The partisan press will portray this as a political decision done to please Mr. Trump .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Justice and the FBI .
He is not someone who would seek to damage those institutions for political purposes .
Mr. Jensen put it this way in a statement Thursday : “ Through the course of my review of General Flynn ’ s case , I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case .
I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings , advised him on these conclusions and he agreed.
” Messrs. Jensen and Barr deserve credit for a brave decision that will not be popular with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic media .
But as the filing notes , the cause of justice is paramount , even after a guilty plea has been made , if the evidence demands a reversal .
There is still much we don ’ t know , and many Russia-related documents we still do not have , and we hope Mr. Barr will continue to make them public as he cleans up after one of the most shameful episodes in FBI and Justice Department history .
For now , at least Michael Flynn can get his life and @ @ @

Must reading for readers who think this couldn’t happen in America.
The Vindication of Michael Flynn
Justice drops its prosecution with new evidence about the FBI.
The Justice Department dropped its case against Michael Flynn on Thursday, “with prejudice,” in a legal filing that should echo far beyond this tragedy of justice delayed. The latest evidence further undermines the credibility of James Comey’s FBI, special counsel Robert Mueller, and the entire “Russia collusion” investigation.
The retired Army general had initially pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI on Jan. 24, 2017, when two agents interviewed him at the White House shortly after he took over as Donald Trump’s national security adviser. But he later reversed his plea as new information emerged that the FBI may have tried to entrap him.
The documents filed on Thursday in federal court vindicate the general’s reversal. Justice said the FBI’s interview of Mr. Flynn was “untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn,” and that the interview was not “conducted with a legitimate investigative basis.”
We recommend the filing for readers who think this couldn’t happen in America. The filing recounts how the FBI had concluded in late 2016 that there was no evidence that Mr. Flynn had colluded with Russia. But the FBI kept the investigation open after it received a transcript of Mr. Flynn’s conversation with the Russian ambassador to the U.S.
Mr. Comey and his loyalists then set up Mr. Flynn in an interview despite having no legal basis. The documents show that Mr. Comey told his deputies not to inform the White House general counsel of the visit and not to tell the White House about his conversation with the ambassador. They also show that Mr. Comey worked around senior Justice officials, including Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who thought the White House should be informed. As he did with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Hillary Clinton’s emails, Mr. Comey acted as if he was a law unto himself.
At the time the agents admitted they did not think Mr. Flynn was lying to them. But as the Justice filing notes, without a legitimate investigative purpose, whether Mr. Flynn was lying was immaterial. He should never have been prosecuted.
Yet Mr. Mueller, who knew all this soon after becoming special counsel, pursued Mr. Flynn, threatening him and his son with ruin until he got the guilty plea. The prosecutor on the case, Brandon Van Grack, was part of Mr. Mueller’s team and consistently denied there was relevant material the government had not turned over to the defense.
But surely the lack of a legal predicate for the interview was exculpatory. Mr. Van Grack told the court Thursday he is withdrawing from the case, but an investigation is warranted to see if he lied to the court. Mr. Mueller’s reputation also stands self-besmirched, and the entire Russia collusion probe looks even more illegitimate and political.
All of this came to light after Attorney General Bill Barr assigned another U.S. Attorney, Jeffrey Jensen, to look at the Flynn case anew. The partisan press will portray this as a political decision done to please Mr. Trump. But Mr. Jensen is a long-time veteran of Justice and the FBI. He is not someone who would seek to damage those institutions for political purposes.
Mr. Jensen put it this way in a statement Thursday: “Through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case. I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions and he agreed.”
Messrs. Jensen and Barr deserve credit for a brave decision that will not be popular with some prosecutors and certainly not with the Democratic media. But as the filing notes, the cause of justice is paramount, even after a guilty plea has been made, if the evidence demands a reversal.
There is still much we don’t know, and many Russia-related documents we still do not have, and we hope Mr. Barr will continue to make them public as he cleans up after one of the most shameful episodes in FBI and Justice Department history. For now, at least Michael Flynn can get his life and reputation back.


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-09--TRAIN WRECK: Biden ‘Virtual Town Hall’ Goes off the Rails, Random Birds, Tech Glitches, ‘Am I On?!’

The incompetence continues from Joe Biden and his campaign .
It ’ s so pathetic .
Dementia Joe is just brutal to watch .
# Trump2020 !
“ Our lending system… You know… we should be designing our economic response to avoid these desperate outcomes… And they ’ re not only desperate… The funds can actually reach people in small businesses… We should be reversing half , ” said Biden .
Joe Biden tried to host a 'virtual town hall ' tonight and looked less like the 2020 Democratic frontrunner and more like a candidate for condo board president in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
https : //t.co/OvSaPMole7 Have a tip we should know ?
Your anonymity is NEVER compromised .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fight , too .

The incompetence continues from Joe Biden and his campaign. It’s so pathetic. Dementia Joe is just brutal to watch. #Trump2020!
TRAIN WRECK: Biden ‘Virtual Town Hall’ Goes off the Rails, Random Birds, Tech Glitches, ‘Am I On?!’ By Sean Hannity, May 8, 2020 Joe Biden’s “Virtual Town Hall Event” turned into a technological nightmare Thursday; featuring the former Vice President overshadowed by bird noises, sound glitches, speech delays, and other embarrassing problems. “They introduce me? Am I on?” asked the Democratic frontrunner. “Our lending system… You know… we should be designing our economic response to avoid these desperate outcomes… And they’re not only desperate… The funds can actually reach people in small businesses… We should be reversing half,” said Biden.
Loud squawking bird repeatedly steals the show, makes the most sense during Biden virtual rally pic.twitter.com/UbwdK3CLRB — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) May 7, 2020
https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/1258546721929392128?s=20
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-10--Saturday Night Cinema: “Can’t We Talk About This?”

Five years ago this week , our free speech event in Garland , Texas was attacked by an Islamic cell .
Muslims , who traveled from Arizona , opened fire on our art exhibit because it was in violation of blasphemy laws under the sharia .
Scroll here .
• TIME Magazine : Pamela Geller : A Response to My Critics—This Is a War Here we are five years later and this week , I filed suit against NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio for banning protests .
Incredible .
Our freedoms are under non-stop attack by the left/Islamic axis .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , if you are a Prime member .
Go here .
Human rights advocacy group the American Freedom Defense Initiative ( AFDI ) today announced the release on Amazon of Can ’ t We Talk About This ?
The Islamic Jihad Against Free Speech , a shocking new film detailing the concerted effort by international organizations to compel the U.S. and other Western countries to curtail the freedom of speech and criminalize criticism of Islam .
Featuring exclusive new interviews with Ayaan Hirsi Ali , Geert Wilders , Mark Steyn , Douglas Murray @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Robert Spencer , Garland Muhammad cartoon contest winner Bosch Fawstin , and many other heroes of freedom , including AFDI President Pamela Geller , this web series will be the first ever to expose the war on free speech .
It is certain to shock the American public and awaken many .
These interviews reveal events at Garland and its aftermath that have never before been made public , and demonstrate how far advanced the war on free speech really is .
AFDI President Pamela Geller said in a statement : “ In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the record straight about our Garland free speech event , at which we were not only targeted by Islamic jihadis but apparently by the FBI as well .
But we ’ re doing much more as well : we ’ re telling the whole , as-yet-untold truth about the war on free speech.
” Geller added : “ Hollywood will never tell this story .
The media will never tell this story .
Our public schools and universities will never teach our children what happened .
The truth must be told.
” Can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a follow-up to AFDI ’ s acclaimed 2011 documentary , The Ground Zero Mosque : The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks .
This much-needed new web series gives viewers the inside story of what happened in Garland and why , and lays out the full and appalling details of the all-out assault on the freedom of speech that is taking place today – and why this may be the most crucial battleground today in the war for the survival of the United States of America as a free republic .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and revealing details not only of the Garland event and the jihad killers who wanted to wage jihad there , but also of the many other battlegrounds in the war for free speech that led up to the Garland attack , including the death fatwa issued in 1989 by the Islamic Republic of Iran against Salman Rushdie for his supposed blasphemy in The Satanic Verses ; the assassination of Theo Van Gogh by a Muslim on an Amsterdam street in November 2004 for his alleged blasphemy ; the Dutch newspaper Jyllands Posten ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ September 2005 , which touched off international riots and killings by Muslims – and most disturbing of all , calls in the West for restrictions on the freedom of speech ; the Organization of Islamic Cooperation ’ s years-long struggle at the UN to compel the West to criminalize “ incitement to religious hatred ” ( a euphemism for criticism of Islam ) ; and the U.S. under Obama signing on to UNCHR Resolution 16/18 , which calls on member states to work to restrict incitement to religious hatred .
Can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ skirmishes in the war against free speech as well , such as Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris ’ “ Everybody Draw Muhammad Day ” in 2010 , after which Norris was forced to go into hiding and change her identity after threats .
And it traces what immediately led up to the Garland event – most notably , the January 2015 massacre of Muhammad cartoonists at the offices of the Charlie Hebdo satirical magazine in Paris and the subsequent “ Stand with the Prophet ” event in Garland , at which Muslim groups gathered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to defend free speech , but to complain about “ Islamophobia , ” while AFDI members and supporters protested outside .
Geller explained : “ We ’ ll set out the media firestorm that followed the Garland event , as well as the attempts to kill me , and explain why the event ’ s detractors were all missing the point : the freedom of speech doesn ’ t apply only if you like the message ; it applies to everyone .
And if it is gone , so is a free society.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ This ?
tells the whole horrifying story of how advanced the Islamic war on free speech is , and how close leftist and Islamic authoritarians are to final victory and the death of the freedom of speech and free society .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Five years ago this week, our free speech event in Garland, Texas was attacked by an Islamic cell. Muslims, who traveled from Arizona, opened fire on our art exhibit because it was in violation of blasphemy laws under the sharia. Scroll here.
This film tells the story.
Here we are five years later and this week, I filed suit against NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio for banning protests.
NY Post: Conservative blogger Pamela Geller sues de Blasio for pandemic protest ban
Incredible. Our freedoms are under nonstop attack by the left/Islamic axis.
You can watch for FREE on Amazon, if you are a Prime member. Go here.
Human rights advocacy group the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) today announced the release on Amazon of Can’t We Talk About This? The Islamic Jihad Against Free Speech, a shocking new film detailing the concerted effort by international organizations to compel the U.S. and other Western countries to curtail the freedom of speech and criminalize criticism of Islam.
Featuring exclusive new interviews with Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders, Mark Steyn, Douglas Murray, Ezra Levant, Lars Vilks, Robert Spencer, Garland Muhammad cartoon contest winner Bosch Fawstin, and many other heroes of freedom, including AFDI President Pamela Geller, this web series will be the first ever to expose the war on free speech. It is certain to shock the American public and awaken many. These interviews reveal events at Garland and its aftermath that have never before been made public, and demonstrate how far advanced the war on free speech really is.
AFDI President Pamela Geller said in a statement: “In this film, we’re setting the record straight about our Garland free speech event, at which we were not only targeted by Islamic jihadis but apparently by the FBI as well. But we’re doing much more as well: we’re telling the whole, as-yet-untold truth about the war on free speech.”
Geller added: “Hollywood will never tell this story. The media will never tell this story. Our public schools and universities will never teach our children what happened. The truth must be told.”
Can’t We Talk About This? is a follow-up to AFDI’s acclaimed 2011 documentary, The Ground Zero Mosque: The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks. This much-needed new web series gives viewers the inside story of what happened in Garland and why, and lays out the full and appalling details of the all-out assault on the freedom of speech that is taking place today – and why this may be the most crucial battleground today in the war for the survival of the United States of America as a free republic.
The web series also features seldom-seen news footage and revealing details not only of the Garland event and the jihad killers who wanted to wage jihad there, but also of the many other battlegrounds in the war for free speech that led up to the Garland attack, including the death fatwa issued in 1989 by the Islamic Republic of Iran against Salman Rushdie for his supposed blasphemy in The Satanic Verses; the assassination of Theo Van Gogh by a Muslim on an Amsterdam street in November 2004 for his alleged blasphemy; the Dutch newspaper Jyllands Posten’s cartoons of Muhammad, published in September 2005, which touched off international riots and killings by Muslims – and most disturbing of all, calls in the West for restrictions on the freedom of speech; the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s years-long struggle at the UN to compel the West to criminalize “incitement to religious hatred” (a euphemism for criticism of Islam); and the U.S. under Obama signing on to UNCHR Resolution 16/18, which calls on member states to work to restrict incitement to religious hatred.
Can’t We Talk About This? covers lesser-known skirmishes in the war against free speech as well, such as Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris’ “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” in 2010, after which Norris was forced to go into hiding and change her identity after threats. And it traces what immediately led up to the Garland event – most notably, the January 2015 massacre of Muhammad cartoonists at the offices of the Charlie Hebdo satirical magazine in Paris and the subsequent “Stand with the Prophet” event in Garland, at which Muslim groups gathered in the wake of that massacre not to defend free speech, but to complain about “Islamophobia,” while AFDI members and supporters protested outside.
Geller explained: “We’ll set out the media firestorm that followed the Garland event, as well as the attempts to kill me, and explain why the event’s detractors were all missing the point: the freedom of speech doesn’t apply only if you like the message; it applies to everyone. And if it is gone, so is a free society.”
Can’t We Talk About This? tells the whole horrifying story of how advanced the Islamic war on free speech is, and how close leftist and Islamic authoritarians are to final victory and the death of the freedom of speech and free society.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-09--BIG FAT LIES: COVID doctors challenge CDC’s rules on cause of death, numbers are beng inflated

Frontline COVID-19 doctors this week have gone public saying they feel pressured to show COVID-19 as cause-of-death on certificates of patients suspected of having the virus when they also have had underlying medical conditions .
Dr. Jonathan Fishbein , a clinical researcher , says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease and the World Health Organization have issued “ vague if not misguided recommendations that unfortunately have been adopted by national , state and local leaders.
” “ It is absolutely critical that we have accurate data to support decision-makers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ If the data in our assessments included patients who have not definitively tested positive for COVID-19 , that provides misleading information to policy-makers .
In cases of pandemics or epidemics , world organizations set the cause-of-death guidelines to create a uniformity among countries and related , international health agencies .
It is not unusual for the CDC , in conjunction with WHO , to add new codes when a new disease appears .
But it is unusual when there is a new disease and a patient dies and the cause of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like diabetes or congestive heart failure and the doctors are pressured to report the cause of death as COVID-19 instead .
Such reporting could result in inaccurately inflating the number of virus-related deaths and hurt those drafting public health policy for future pandemics or epidemics .
On March 4 , Steven Schwartz , director of Vital Statistics at the CDC ’ s National Center for Health Statistics released an Alert to hospital administrators to inform them that formal guidance was forthcoming to death certificate certifiers , but that in the meantime , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.
” On March 24 , 2020 , Schwartz sent out a second Alert addressing the World Health Organization ’ s new International Classification of Diseases .
‘ “ The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate .
However , the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID19 being the underlying cause more often than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states .
“ COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death , ” Schwartz also wrote .
“ If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed , these conditions can be reported in Part II.
” “ Distinguishing between those nuances is crucial for accurate analysis and appropriately responding to the crisis , ” Fishbein said .
Fishbein and his colleagues have in response created an independent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ factors and treatments for COVID-19 , with the expectation of more accurately recording causes of death .
The reporting tool was developed by Veracuity and the survey is being conducted in partnership with the Alliance for Clinical Research Excellence and Safety ( ACRES ) .

Frontline COVID-19 doctors this week have gone public saying they feel pressured to show COVID-19 as cause-of-death on certificates of patients suspected of having the virus when they also have had underlying medical conditions.
Dr. Jonathan Fishbein, a clinical researcher, says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease and the World Health Organization have issued “vague if not misguided recommendations that unfortunately have been adopted by national, state and local leaders.”
“It is absolutely critical that we have accurate data to support decision-makers,” he also told Just the News. “If the data in our assessments included patients who have not definitively tested positive for COVID-19, that provides misleading information to policy-makers.
In cases of pandemics or epidemics, world organizations set the cause-of-death guidelines to create a uniformity among countries and related, international health agencies.
It is not unusual for the CDC, in conjunction with WHO, to add new codes when a new disease appears.
But it is unusual when there is a new disease and a patient dies and the cause of their death may be their underlying condition like diabetes or congestive heart failure and the doctors are pressured to report the cause of death as COVID-19 instead.
Such reporting could result in inaccurately inflating the number of virus-related deaths and hurt those drafting public health policy for future pandemics or epidemics.
On March 4, Steven Schwartz, director of Vital Statistics at the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics released an Alert to hospital administrators to inform them that formal guidance was forthcoming to death certificate certifiers, but that in the meantime, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
On March 24, 2020, Schwartz sent out a second Alert addressing the World Health Organization’s new International Classification of Diseases.
‘“The underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID19 being the underlying cause more often than not,” the report in part states.
“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” Schwartz also wrote. “If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
“Distinguishing between those nuances is crucial for accurate analysis and appropriately responding to the crisis,” Fishbein said.
Fishbein and his colleagues have in response created an independent survey to collect evidence to evaluate risk factors and treatments for COVID-19, with the expectation of more accurately recording causes of death.
The reporting tool was developed by Veracuity and the survey is being conducted in partnership with the Alliance for Clinical Research Excellence and Safety (ACRES).


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-09--Killer Cuomo EXTENDS LOCKDOWN despite lowest hospitalizations since mid-March, de Blasio closes park

Killer Cuomo EXTENDS LOCKDOWN despite lowest hospitalizations since mid-March, de Blasio closes parks

The left is using the a flu with a lower mortality rate than the seasonal flu ( with a vaccine ) to seize complete dictatorial control .
Starting this weekend , the city will limit capacity at Hudson River Park Piers 45 and 46 , where the “ configuration ” lends itself to overcrowding .
Expect an increased NYPD presence , de Blasio said .
Domino Park will be closely monitored .
Other parks could later see capacity limited .
Look directly to the data .
• Majority of deaths are in nursing homes , congregate homes , assisted living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not dangerous .
– hiding at home is .
It lowers your immune system .
How long are you going to hide ?
U.S .
Constitutional liberties are not suspended on the whims of authoritarian leftist mayors and governors over a manufactured crisis… Geoegia has been open for weeks .
No mass death , no spike – as predicted by the fear pornographers and panic pushers .
NY ‘ PAUSE ’ Order Extended to June 6 ; New COVID-19 Hospitalizations Lowest Since Mid-March New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stay-at-home order until June 6 , seemingly extending the order by nearly three weeks from the previously scheduled May 15 deadline .
Although the directive would extend current orders to close non-essential businesses , Cuomo ’ s office says regions of the state that meet the governor ’ s four core metrics in restricting the spread of the virus could open as soon as May 15 ; the first phase of reopening includes businesses in construction , manufacturing and retail with curb-side pickup .
“ On Monday we said that those who hit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the reopening process .
For those who haven ’ t , the “ PAUSE ” has been extended until June 7 , ” Richard Azzopardi , spokesperson for the governor , said Saturday .
The governor had said for weeks he expected to allow his shutdown directive to expire after May 15 in some lesser-impacted parts of the state while extending it in others .
In an interview on “ The Late Show With Stephen Colbert ” Thursday night , he indicated some regions would start to reopen “ in about a week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any additional detail in his daily briefing the next day .
“ When we get to May 15 , I ’ ll lay out the numbers and we ’ ll say , ‘ This is what the numbers say , ' ” Cuomo said when asked about the directive Friday .
“ There ’ s no doubt that this is a terrible period , but we have to get through it .
If we make a mistake and we act too quickly the situation is only going to get worse and it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It seems likely that some northern and western parts of the state are ready to reopen , but there are still 21 New York zip codes whose COVID-19 numbers are still too high where the bulk of cases are located ( and are disproportionately impacting communities of color ) .
“ Upstate New York is dramatically different .
We will talk about construction and manufacturing reopening upstate .
Downstate I don ’ t see those numbers dramatically enough , ” Cuomo said .
New York State reported 572 new hospitalizations on Saturday , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sign of the state ’ s progress since flattening the curve .
Total hospitalizations and intubations are steadily but slowly declining .
Despite the good news , Cuomo said the addition of 226 COVID-related deaths highlighted the state ’ s “ infuriatingly constant ” death toll .
Saturday ’ s number of deaths reflected an average from the previous five days and matched the number reported back on May 3 .
As of Saturday , New York state had confirmed 21,271 virus deaths , with Cuomo adding another 226 to the toll .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 fatalities ; those combined with the state ’ s 14,505 confirmed deaths in the five boroughs bring the city ’ s toll to nearly 20,000 .
Conscious of the need to maintain progress , and witnessing setbacks in other states that have eased restrictions perhaps too aggressively , Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio are refining their containment strategies in accordance with emerging trends .
Still , one proven tactic will be the bedrock of their response for months to come : Social distancing .
Warming weather makes that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ single-hardest place to implement those kinds of strategies , for us to live in that way , and yet you have been doing in such amazing , impressive , extraordinary fashion , ” de Blasio said Friday .
“ Never rest on your laurels .
When you start winning , it ’ s time to double down.
” Starting this weekend , the city will limit capacity at Hudson River Park Piers 45 and 46 , where the “ configuration ” lends itself to overcrowding .
Expect an increased NYPD presence , de @ @ @ @ @ @ @ closely monitored .
Other parks could later see capacity limited .
The NYPD has been enforcing social distancing protocol for weeks and the mayor says the department will continue to do so , despite mounting criticism that likens police methods to “ stop-and-frisk.
” Newly released data from the Brooklyn district attorney ’ s office shows of the 40 people arrested for social distancing violations in the borough since mid-March , just one was white .
Thirty-five were black , while four were Latino .
All cases were dropped .
On Friday , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it issued 374 summonses for “ violations of emergency procedures and acts likely to spread disease ” citywide since March 16 .
Eighty-one percent of those went to black or Latino people .
De Blasio acknowledged some of the data and methods , including one arrest where a stun gun was used , was alarming .
He said the city will keep improving training and protocols moving forward , but summonses and arrests may still be necessary at times .
The Sergeants Benevolent Association criticized the mayor ’ s social distancing policies on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on how to enforce the measures , union president Ed Mullins said in a letter to NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea .
“ We have no clear idea how this new order is intended to be implemented , and foresee a repeat of the same enforcement difficulties we have already experienced , including a repeat of the allegations that my members have violated the civil rights of New Yorkers , ” Mullins wrote in the letter .
“ To impute blame for racial disparity to the frontline officers attempting to enforce a vague and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerns and is , quite frankly , offensive.
” Mullins said that ordering a person not causing a disturbance off a public street and threatening them with arrest for not wearing a mask can “ destroy the community relations.
” The union also expressed their unhappiness with being told to enforce a law they say the district attorneys are not prosecuting offenders for allegedly violating .
The SBA said it was that confusion that has led to some of the high-profile incidents regarding arrests in the city over the past few weeks .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and enforcement is necessary to saving lives — and we ’ re not going to have proper enforcement without the largest , best police force in the country being in the game , ” the mayor said .
“ So we ’ re going to do that , but we ’ re going to keep working to make it better literally every day.
” It ’ s social distancing to scale that has driven the change in curve for New York , he and Cuomo say , likely saving many lives .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it will only be more important in helping keep the infection rate down .
To help trace the new cases that do continue to spring up , de Blasio said that 7,000 people have signed up to be “ disease detectives ” and do contact tracing for those who test positive .

The left is using the flu with a lower mortality rate than the seasonal flu (with a vaccine) to seize complete dictatorial control.
Starting this weekend, the city will limit capacity at Hudson River Park Piers 45 and 46, where the “configuration” lends itself to overcrowding. Expect an increased NYPD presence, de Blasio said. Domino Park will be closely monitored. Other parks could later see capacity limited.
Look directly to the data.
Median Corona death age – 82 years.
Majority of deaths are in nursing homes, congregate homes, assisted living,
Most vulnerable – elderly with co-morbidiites.
Lower fatality rate than seasonal flu.
Not a threat to children.
Young people mostly asymptomatic.
Models were all wildly inaccurate.
Fresh air and sun are not dangerous. – hiding at home is. It lowers your immune system. How long are you going to hide?
U.S. Constitutional liberties are not suspended on the whims of authoritarian leftist mayors and governors over a manufactured crisis…
Fck @NYGovCuomo Mussolini wannabe. There is no reason on G-d’s green earth to be doing this. Hadn’t he killed all the old people already? NY ‘PAUSE’ Order Extended to June 6; New COVID-19 Hospitalizations Lowest Since Mid-March https://t.co/bKcDtnOqqr — Pamela Geller (@PamelaGeller) May 9, 2020
In NYC, City MD, a well known healthcare comp that operates more than 120 urgent care centers, are giving COVID & antibody tests for FREE. They’re empty. People arent going. It’s telling. If its a beautiful day, they’ll go to the park & then go back to lockdown. NY is dead https://t.co/NiL0EKYmE4 — Pamela Geller (@PamelaGeller) May 9, 2020
Geoegia has been open for weeks. No mass death, no spike – as predicted by the fear pornographers and panic pushers.
NY ‘PAUSE’ Order Extended to June 6; New COVID-19 Hospitalizations Lowest Since Mid-March By NBC News, May 10, 2020: New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order Thursday allowing the state to extend the stay-at-home order until June 6, seemingly extending the order by nearly three weeks from the previously scheduled May 15 deadline. Although the directive would extend current orders to close non-essential businesses, Cuomo’s office says regions of the state that meet the governor’s four core metrics in restricting the spread of the virus could open as soon as May 15; the first phase of reopening includes businesses in construction, manufacturing and retail with curb-side pickup. “On Monday we said that those who hit their benchmarks on May 15 can begin the reopening process. For those who haven’t, the “PAUSE” has been extended until June 7,” Richard Azzopardi, spokesperson for the governor, said Saturday. The governor had said for weeks he expected to allow his shutdown directive to expire after May 15 in some lesser-impacted parts of the state while extending it in others. In an interview on “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” Thursday night, he indicated some regions would start to reopen “in about a week,” but didn’t offer any additional detail in his daily briefing the next day. “When we get to May 15, I’ll lay out the numbers and we’ll say, ‘This is what the numbers say,'” Cuomo said when asked about the directive Friday. “There’s no doubt that this is a terrible period, but we have to get through it. If we make a mistake and we act too quickly the situation is only going to get worse and it’s only going to get longer.” It seems likely that some northern and western parts of the state are ready to reopen, but there are still 21 New York zip codes whose COVID-19 numbers are still too high where the bulk of cases are located (and are disproportionately impacting communities of color). “Upstate New York is dramatically different. We will talk about construction and manufacturing reopening upstate. Downstate I don’t see those numbers dramatically enough,” Cuomo said. New York State reported 572 new hospitalizations on Saturday, the lowest number since mid-March, a sign of the state’s progress since flattening the curve. Total hospitalizations and intubations are steadily but slowly declining. Despite the good news, Cuomo said the addition of 226 COVID-related deaths highlighted the state’s “infuriatingly constant” death toll. Saturday’s number of deaths reflected an average from the previous five days and matched the number reported back on May 3. As of Saturday, New York state had confirmed 21,271 virus deaths, with Cuomo adding another 226 to the toll. New York City reports another 5,327 probable COVID-19 fatalities; those combined with the state’s 14,505 confirmed deaths in the five boroughs bring the city’s toll to nearly 20,000. Conscious of the need to maintain progress, and witnessing setbacks in other states that have eased restrictions perhaps too aggressively, Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio are refining their containment strategies in accordance with emerging trends.
WHAT SETBACKS?
Still, one proven tactic will be the bedrock of their response for months to come: Social distancing. Warming weather makes that harder. “This may be the single-hardest place to implement those kinds of strategies, for us to live in that way, and yet you have been doing in such amazing, impressive, extraordinary fashion,” de Blasio said Friday. “Never rest on your laurels. When you start winning, it’s time to double down.” Starting this weekend, the city will limit capacity at Hudson River Park Piers 45 and 46, where the “configuration” lends itself to overcrowding. Expect an increased NYPD presence, de Blasio said. Domino Park will be closely monitored. Other parks could later see capacity limited. The NYPD has been enforcing social distancing protocol for weeks and the mayor says the department will continue to do so, despite mounting criticism that likens police methods to “stop-and-frisk.” Newly released data from the Brooklyn district attorney’s office shows of the 40 people arrested for social distancing violations in the borough since mid-March, just one was white. Thirty-five were black, while four were Latino. All cases were dropped. On Friday, the NYPD released fuller data that shows it issued 374 summonses for “violations of emergency procedures and acts likely to spread disease” citywide since March 16. Eighty-one percent of those went to black or Latino people. De Blasio acknowledged some of the data and methods, including one arrest where a stun gun was used, was alarming. He said the city will keep improving training and protocols moving forward, but summonses and arrests may still be necessary at times. The Sergeants Benevolent Association criticized the mayor’s social distancing policies on the grounds that they have no guidance on how to enforce the measures, union president Ed Mullins said in a letter to NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea. “We have no clear idea how this new order is intended to be implemented, and foresee a repeat of the same enforcement difficulties we have already experienced, including a repeat of the allegations that my members have violated the civil rights of New Yorkers,” Mullins wrote in the letter. “To impute blame for racial disparity to the frontline officers attempting to enforce a vague and ambiguous Executive Order highlights our members’ concerns and is, quite frankly, offensive.” Mullins said that ordering a person not causing a disturbance off a public street and threatening them with arrest for not wearing a mask can “destroy the community relations.” The union also expressed their unhappiness with being told to enforce a law they say the district attorneys are not prosecuting offenders for allegedly violating. The SBA said it was that confusion that has led to some of the high-profile incidents regarding arrests in the city over the past few weeks. “Job 1 is to save lives and enforcement is necessary to saving lives — and we’re not going to have proper enforcement without the largest, best police force in the country being in the game,” the mayor said. “So we’re going to do that, but we’re going to keep working to make it better literally every day.” It’s social distancing to scale that has driven the change in curve for New York, he and Cuomo say, likely saving many lives. As the city and state look toward reopening, it will only be more important in helping keep the infection rate down. To help trace the new cases that do continue to spring up, de Blasio said that 7,000 people have signed up to be “disease detectives” and do contact tracing for those who test positive.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-09--The American Thinker: Pamela Geller Sues Bill de Blasio for Forbidding New Yorkers to Protest during

The American Thinker: Pamela Geller Sues Bill de Blasio for Forbidding New Yorkers to Protest during COVID-19

The petty tyrant Warren Wilhelm ( that ’ s Bill de Blasio ’ s real name ) who is currently mayor of New York City , not content with scapegoating Jews for the spread of the coronavirus , has now gone to war against the First Amendment .
Fox News reported Wednesday that de Blasio and his NYPD commissioner , Dermot Shea , “ stated outright this week that people are not permitted to gather for protests in public due to the coronavirus pandemic.
” Apparently , Mayor Wilhelm thinks he is in 1930s Berlin .
But this will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suit against de Blasio and Shea for violating my First Amendment right to freedom of assembly .
De Blasio and Shea adopted their breathtaking authoritarian measure in full knowledge that they were violating the United States Constitution .
“ You ’ re talking about some of the values we hold in the highest regard in this country and certainly in this city , the right for people to gather , the right to free speech and the right to protest , ” Shea said Monday .
“ But now comes the bad news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and executive orders have been issued , these are laws that have been passed down through executive order to keep people alive , while we greatly , greatly respect the right of people to protest , there should not be protests taking place in the middle of a pandemic by gathering outside and putting people at risk.
” Shea ’ s statements are in brazen violation of the First Amendment and reveal that Shea , and de Blasio as well , understands the Constitution about as much as he respects it .
For @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ People who want to make their voices heard , there are plenty of ways to do it without gathering in person.
” He called upon people to “ use all the other tools you have to get your point across but avoid anything that might put other people in harm ’ s way.
” No .
The Constitution does not carry any clause rescinding these rights if the powers that be decide that exercising them would put people in harm ’ s way .
These liberties are not granted by government to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whims of government officials .
These liberties are given by G-d and possessed by the people , and they are guaranteed against government interference by the Constitution .
In other words , the Constitution explicitly and definitively rules out the action de Blasio and Shea have taken .
The complaint , which was filed yesterday by my attorneys , David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise of the American Freedom Law Center ( AFLC ) , is a beautiful thing .
It states that “ this case seeks to protect and vindicate fundamental liberties that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from government interference.
” It notes that the Constitution guarantees a right to protest , including the freedom of speech , and that de Blasio and Shea , “ through the adoption and enforcement of executive edicts , have suspended this fundamental right in the City of New York.
” The complaint notes that “ the right to freedom of speech is not a right to catharsis .
It is a right to meaningfully protest and assemble in public in order to change public policy .
The most effective way to exercise this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a large public protest.
” But de Blasio and Shea have infringed upon this freedom as well .
The stakes in this lawsuit are extremely high .
In fact , they couldn ’ t be higher .
As the complaint notes , “ John Adams warned that ‘ Liberty once lost is lost forever.
’ All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent .
Through this Complaint , Plaintiff Geller challenges Defendants ’ suspension of the First Amendment .
There is no justification , pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to revoke this fundamental right of the people.
” The purpose of the suit is to “ protect and vindicate fundamental constitutional rights .
It is a civil rights action brought under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C .
§1983 , challenging Defendants ’ restriction on Plaintiff ’ s right to engage in peaceful protests and protected speech in public forums in the City of New York.
” I ’ m seeking a declaration that Defendants violated my clearly established constitutional rights as set forth in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ declaration that the restriction that de Blasio and Shea have placed upon the First Amendment violates the United States Constitution and 42 USC §1983 .
I ’ m asking for a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the enforcement of this First Amendment violation and nominal damages for the past loss of my constitutional rights .
If we lose , it ’ s no exaggeration to say the Constitution , and our freedom , is dead .
We must win , and we will win .
Pamela Geller is the president of the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ publisher of The Geller Report ; and author of the bestselling book FATWA : Hunted in America , as well as The Post-American Presidency : The Obama Administration ’ s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America : A Practical Guide to the Resistance .
Follow her on Twitter and Facebook .

The petty tyrant Warren Wilhelm (that’s Bill de Blasio’s real name) who is currently mayor of New York City, not content with scapegoating Jews for the spread of the coronavirus, has now gone to war against the First Amendment. Fox News reported Wednesday that de Blasio and his NYPD commissioner, Dermot Shea, “stated outright this week that people are not permitted to gather for protests in public due to the coronavirus pandemic.” Apparently, Mayor Wilhelm thinks he is in 1930s Berlin. But this will not stand. On Thursday, I filed suit against de Blasio and Shea for violating my First Amendment right to freedom of assembly.
De Blasio and Shea adopted their breathtaking authoritarian measure in full knowledge that they were violating the United States Constitution. “You’re talking about some of the values we hold in the highest regard in this country and certainly in this city, the right for people to gather, the right to free speech and the right to protest,” Shea said Monday. “But now comes the bad news, we’re in a pandemic and executive orders have been issued, these are laws that have been passed down through executive order to keep people alive, while we greatly, greatly respect the right of people to protest, there should not be protests taking place in the middle of a pandemic by gathering outside and putting people at risk.”
Shea’s statements are in brazen violation of the First Amendment and reveal that Shea, and de Blasio as well, understands the Constitution about as much as he respects it. For his part, the mayor said: “People who want to make their voices heard, there are plenty of ways to do it without gathering in person.” He called upon people to “use all the other tools you have to get your point across but avoid anything that might put other people in harm’s way.”
No. The Constitution does not carry any clause rescinding these rights if the powers that be decide that exercising them would put people in harm’s way. These liberties are not granted by government to then be rescinded at the will and whims of government officials. These liberties are given by G-d and possessed by the people, and they are guaranteed against government interference by the Constitution.
In other words, the Constitution explicitly and definitively rules out the action de Blasio and Shea have taken. The complaint, which was filed yesterday by my attorneys, David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise of the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), is a beautiful thing. It states that “this case seeks to protect and vindicate fundamental liberties that citizens of the United States enjoy free from government interference.” It notes that the Constitution guarantees a right to protest, including the freedom of speech, and that de Blasio and Shea, “through the adoption and enforcement of executive edicts, have suspended this fundamental right in the City of New York.”
The complaint notes that “the right to freedom of speech is not a right to catharsis. It is a right to meaningfully protest and assemble in public in order to change public policy. The most effective way to exercise this right is to organize and participate in a large public protest.” But de Blasio and Shea have infringed upon this freedom as well.
The stakes in this lawsuit are extremely high. In fact, they couldn’t be higher. As the complaint notes, “John Adams warned that ‘Liberty once lost is lost forever.’ All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. Through this Complaint, Plaintiff Geller challenges Defendants’ suspension of the First Amendment. There is no justification, pandemic or otherwise, for a government official to revoke this fundamental right of the people.”
The purpose of the suit is to “protect and vindicate fundamental constitutional rights. It is a civil rights action brought under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. §1983, challenging Defendants’ restriction on Plaintiff’s right to engage in peaceful protests and protected speech in public forums in the City of New York.”
I’m seeking a declaration that Defendants violated my clearly established constitutional rights as set forth in the complaint, as well as a declaration that the restriction that de Blasio and Shea have placed upon the First Amendment violates the United States Constitution and 42 USC §1983. I’m asking for a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the enforcement of this First Amendment violation and nominal damages for the past loss of my constitutional rights.
If we lose, it’s no exaggeration to say the Constitution, and our freedom, is dead. We must win, and we will win.
Pamela Geller is the president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI); publisher of The Geller Report; and author of the bestselling book FATWA: Hunted in America, as well as The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter and Facebook.


Tara Reade Interview

Tara Reade explains past praise for Biden , cryptic ‘ tic toc ’ tweet she made before coming forward Tara Reade addressed her past praise for former Vice President Joe Biden during an interview released on Friday , as well as a cryptic message on Twitter that has drawn the attention of skeptics of Reade ’ s claim that Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993 .
Reade went public with her assault claim against Biden in late March .
Last year , she was one of several women to come forward and accuse the presumptive Democratic nominee of unwanted touching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social media activity , including her positive responses to Biden ’ s activism on behalf of sex assault victims , raised eyebrows .
“ As recently as 2017 , you were praising Joe Biden publicly , ” interviewer Megyn Kelly .
“ And I think that has a lot of people scratching their heads , right ?
” Kelly continued .
“ On multiple occasions , you retweeted or liked online praise for Joe Biden and his work combatting sexual assault .
There was a compliment you tweeted about him saying , ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ “ I mean , it is true that women do sometimes praise men who have sexually harassed or abused them , ” Kelly added , “ but why would you publicly praise Joe Biden for actions on sexual assault when you claim that ’ s what he did to you ?
” “ Well , one thing during that time- I ’ m an expert witness on domestic violence issues , as you know , so that was , like an account , you know , part of that awareness of domestic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reade responded , alluding to a past marriage to an abusive husband .
“ I ’ ve always been conflicted about Joe Biden .
I didn ’ t want to talk badly about him and I wasn ’ t ready to tell my history with Joe Biden at that point at all .
And nor [ did I have ] any idea of going to the press at that point .
It wasn ’ t until 2019 when I saw Lucy Flores and the way the media treated her … I felt like @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Watch!
Tara Reade explains past praise for Biden, cryptic ‘tic toc’ tweet she made before coming forward
By Fox News, May 9, 2020
Tara Reade addressed her past praise for former Vice President Joe Biden during an interview released on Friday, as well as a cryptic message on Twitter that has drawn the attention of skeptics of Reade’s claim that Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993.
Reade went public with her assault claim against Biden in late March. Last year, she was one of several women to come forward and accuse the presumptive Democratic nominee of unwanted touching. However, Reade’s past social media activity, including her positive responses to Biden’s activism on behalf of sex assault victims, raised eyebrows.
“As recently as 2017, you were praising Joe Biden publicly,” interviewer Megyn Kelly.
“Right,” Reade acknowledged.
“And I think that has a lot of people scratching their heads, right?” Kelly continued. “On multiple occasions, you retweeted or liked online praise for Joe Biden and his work combatting sexual assault. There was a compliment you tweeted about him saying, ‘My old boss speaks truth. Listen.’
“I mean, it is true that women do sometimes praise men who have sexually harassed or abused them,” Kelly added, “but why would you publicly praise Joe Biden for actions on sexual assault when you claim that’s what he did to you?”
“Well, one thing during that time- I’m an expert witness on domestic violence issues, as you know, so that was, like an account, you know, part of that awareness of domestic violence and other violent acts,” Reade responded, alluding to a past marriage to an abusive husband. “I’ve always been conflicted about Joe Biden. I didn’t want to talk badly about him and I wasn’t ready to tell my history with Joe Biden at that point at all. And nor [did I have] any idea of going to the press at that point. It wasn’t until 2019 when I saw Lucy Flores and the way the media treated her … I felt like I wanted to come forward.”


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-09--VOTER FRAUD: Trump Campaign Slams California’s Vote-by-Mail Order: ‘Wide-Open Opportunity for Fraud’

It ’ s one of the key objectives of the Democrat lockdown – stealing the Presidential election .
They know they can ’ t win fairly , so they will cheat .
Guaranteed .
Vote-by-mail must not be allowed .
President Donald Trump ’ s re-election campaign blasted California Gov .
Gavin Newsom ’ s ( D-CA ) executive order allowing registered voters in the state to vote by mail in the November election , calling it a “ thinly-veiled political tactic ” aimed at undermining election security .
Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh said in a statement to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tactic by Gov .
Newsom to undermine election security .
There ’ s a vast difference between people voting absentee by mail because they can ’ t be at the poll on Election Day versus mailing everyone a ballot – even those who didn ’ t request one – is a wide open opportunity for fraud .
California has a bad record on ensuring that people on the voter rolls still live at the same address , still reside in California , or are even still alive .
Everyone is concerned about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ security is the wrong way to go about it .
Earlier Friday , Newsom approved voting by mail , citing health concerns stemming from the Chinese coronavirus pandemic .
“ I signed an executive order that will allow every registered voter in California to receive a mail-in ballot , ” Newsom said in a press conference .
“ That mail-in ballot is important , but it ’ s not an exclusive substitute to physical locations.
” “ People that are otherwise not familiar with mail-in ballots , are uncomfortable with them , may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that may preclude that as an appropriate option , we still want to have the appropriate number of physical sites for people to vote as well , ” added the governor .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

It’s one of the key objectives of the Democrat lockdown – stealing the Presidential election.
They know they can’t win fairly, so they will cheat. Guaranteed. Vote-by-mail must not be allowed.
The one who lost 33,000 emails wants mail in voting. Go figure. https://t.co/I9jOp5MjYj — Michael Keyes (@michaelkeyes) May 8, 2020
The RNC & @TeamTrump are doubling our budget to $20M to fight Democrats’ radical lawsuits, which would create more opportunities for voter fraud and legalize ballot harvesting. Americans must have confidence in our elections!https://t.co/tidEkbV9KS — Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) May 8, 2020
We cannot afford to let the Democrats’ assault on our elections go unchallenged. They want to sue their way to victory in 2020, and we are fighting back to protect the integrity of the vote! https://t.co/14m6hoQWni — Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) May 7, 2020
Trump Campaign Slams California’s Vote-by-Mail Order: ‘Wide-Open Opportunity for Fraud’ By Breitbart, May 8, 2020 President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign blasted California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D-CA) executive order allowing registered voters in the state to vote by mail in the November election, calling it a “thinly-veiled political tactic” aimed at undermining election security. Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh said in a statement to CNN: This is a thinly-veiled political tactic by Gov. Newsom to undermine election security. There’s a vast difference between people voting absentee by mail because they can’t be at the poll on Election Day versus mailing everyone a ballot – even those who didn’t request one – is a wide open opportunity for fraud. California has a bad record on ensuring that people on the voter rolls still live at the same address, still reside in California, or are even still alive. Everyone is concerned about the safety of voters, but jeopardizing election security is the wrong way to go about it.
JUST IN: the @realDonaldTrump campaign has responded to this news out of California.. Spox @TimMurtaugh tells @CNN said this move will “undermine election security”.
Full statement:
via @DJJudd https://t.co/jSHczb9fei pic.twitter.com/fk3HHjQhSS — Ryan Nobles (@ryanobles) May 8, 2020
Earlier Friday, Newsom approved voting by mail, citing health concerns stemming from the Chinese coronavirus pandemic. “I signed an executive order that will allow every registered voter in California to receive a mail-in ballot,” Newsom said in a press conference. “That mail-in ballot is important, but it’s not an exclusive substitute to physical locations.” “People that are otherwise not familiar with mail-in ballots, are uncomfortable with them, may have disabilities, may have other issues that may preclude that as an appropriate option, we still want to have the appropriate number of physical sites for people to vote as well,” added the governor.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-05-09--Abortion activists want to ban Pro-life student group as “terrorists”

Abortion-supporting students at a Christian university are attempting to get a pro-life group kicked off campus for being “ terrorists ” .
Matt Lamb of Students for Life of America says a pro-life chapter has been approved by the student government at Case Western Reserve University , angering intolerant pro-choice fascists on campus .
Case Western , a private research university , can trace its roots back to the 1820s and an effort to introduce more ministers to the Midwest .
Today , the school has a student population of approximately 11,900 with the motto “ Christ and the Church.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ University in Ohio were upset that the Undergraduate Student Government approved the Students for Life group on campus .
In a petition , the intolerant group who refuses any diversity of thought , is trying to get Students for Life kicked off campus , organizing a referendum on the group .
In their petition , the group calls Students for Life “ terrorists ” , whereas the Pro-choice are the real terrorists , and the Pro-life the open-minded who accept other opinion voices to be heard .
In reaction , Kristan Hawkins , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said : “ It is unbelievable that pro-choice students would call peaceful pro-lifers ‘ terrorists , ’ because we pray and sidewalk counsel outside of abortion facilities .
The pro-life generation and the pro-life movement is one of peace ; we , after all , work every day to end the violence of abortion .
It is the incendiary language from pro-choicers that leads to violence and hatred against pro-lifers .
Clearly , these students need to take a few more classes on Constitutional law , as abortion is jerry-rigged into law through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not the 14th amendment , which legal experts argue actually offers protections to lives , born and preborn , if correctly applied .
” Pro-choice attacks us because , as they say : “ Students for Life operate with the goal to completely abolish abortion : a right provided by the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States and a human right recognized by the United Nations.
” • None But first , the fourteenth amendment doesn ’ t grant the right to abortion .
If it did , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• Second , if Pro-choice students were truly concerned about the Constitution , they would not ignore the first amendment and cancel other people ’ s freedom of expression .
You don ’ t get to cherry-pick the amendment you like and order the opponents to obey it , and at the same time ignore the ones you don ’ t like , and act as if you don ’ t have to respect and enforce them .
Lily Hutkowski , the Indiana/Ohio Regional Coordinator for Students for Life rightly added : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Life group is set to continue operating , as both the student government and the administration have appeared sympathetic and supportive of the Students for Life group .
In my long experience , what progressive activists accuse you of is exactly what they are guilty of .
This is a very human characteristic : a liar thinks you ’ re lying because that ’ s the first thought that comes to his mind , he doesn ’ t imagine that you can be anything but a liar because lying seems natural , universal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are a seed of totalitarians , fascists , intolerant people filled with hatred for those who do not share their opinions or obey their orders – their physical attacks , destruction on campus , and verbal abuse are abundant proof of it , and they believe that the opposite side can only think as they think .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Abortion-supporting students at a Christian university are attempting to get a pro-life group kicked off campus for being “terrorists”.
Matt Lamb of Students for Life of America says a pro-life chapter has been approved by the student government at Case Western Reserve University, angering intolerant pro-choice fascists on campus.
Case Western, a private research university, can trace its roots back to the 1820s and an effort to introduce more ministers to the Midwest. Today, the school has a student population of approximately 11,900 with the motto “Christ and the Church.”
Pro-choice students at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio were upset that the Undergraduate Student Government approved the Students for Life group on campus. In a petition, the intolerant group who refuses any diversity of thought, is trying to get Students for Life kicked off campus, organizing a referendum on the group. In their petition, the group calls Students for Life “terrorists”, whereas the Pro-choice are the real terrorists, and the Pro-life the open-minded who accept other opinion voices to be heard.
In reaction, Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America said:
“It is unbelievable that pro-choice students would call peaceful pro-lifers ‘terrorists,’ because we pray and sidewalk counsel outside of abortion facilities. The pro-life generation and the pro-life movement is one of peace; we, after all, work every day to end the violence of abortion. It is the incendiary language from pro-choicers that leads to violence and hatred against pro-lifers. Clearly, these students need to take a few more classes on Constitutional law, as abortion is jerry-rigged into law through Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, not the 14th amendment, which legal experts argue actually offers protections to lives, born and preborn, if correctly applied. ” Pro-choice attacks us because, as they say: “Students for Life operate with the goal to completely abolish abortion: a right provided by the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States and a human right recognized by the United Nations.”
But first, the fourteenth amendment doesn’t grant the right to abortion. If it did, the conversation would be a very different one.
Second, if Pro-choice students were truly concerned about the Constitution, they would not ignore the first amendment and cancel other people’s freedom of expression. You don’t get to cherry-pick the amendment you like and order the opponents to obey it, and at the same time ignore the ones you don’t like, and act as if you don’t have to respect and enforce them.
Lily Hutkowski, the Indiana/Ohio Regional Coordinator for Students for Life rightly added:
“Ironically, these students seek to shut off debate and the sharing of information in the name of ‘protecting women.’ Free speech rights must be protected on campus. We look forward to confronting the astounding ignorance and hatred that the pro-abortion students are promoting on campus.”
Fortunately, the Case Western Students for Life group is set to continue operating, as both the student government and the administration have appeared sympathetic and supportive of the Students for Life group.
Why it matters
In my long experience, what progressive activists accuse you of is exactly what they are guilty of. This is a very human characteristic: a liar thinks you’re lying because that’s the first thought that comes to his mind, he doesn’t imagine that you can be anything but a liar because lying seems natural, universal to him. Likewise, Pro-choice Students are a seed of totalitarians, fascists, intolerant people filled with hatred for those who do not share their opinions or obey their orders – their physical attacks, destruction on campus, and verbal abuse are abundant proof of it, and they believe that the opposite side can only think as they think.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here