pamelagellerreport--2020-10-23--Ilhan Omar, AOC join blogger who said ‘America deserved 9/11’

Omar backs American Islamic State jihadis – so how far away is “ America deserved 9/11 ” ?
Radical congresswomen push message to vote , but do it online with vlogger who said America ‘ deserved ’ infamous terror attack .
Congresswomen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar went on the popular gaming platform Twitch with a social media personality who gained notoriety for saying that “ America deserved 9/11 , ” Fox News reported Thursday .
AOC and Omar were joined by Hasan Piker , who in a tirade last year against Republican Congressman Dan Crenshaw said “ America deserved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ m saying it.
” Piker later apologized for the statement and tried to blame it on English being his second language .
The congresswomen went online to join a group of gamers playing the streaming game “ Among Us ” with the goal of getting Twitch ’ s young audience to vote in the Nov. 3 election .
Piker is a video blogger , or vlogger , on Twitch , a massive streaming service that focuses primarily on video games and is estimated to have 15 million or more daily active @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a contributor to Young Turks , a left-wing news and opinion channel on YouTube .
On a Twitch stream last year , Piker lashed out at Crenshaw ’ s opposition to halting arms sales to Saudi Arabia .
As a result of the 9/11 comment Twitch suspended Piker , who claimed his comments were taken out of context .
Last year , Omar got into hot water for saying “ some people did something ” in reference to the 9/11 attacks during a speech in front of the the Council on American-Islamic Relations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the infamous “ Holy Land ” terrorism case .
Omar ’ s comments at the CAIR event prompted furious responses from members of Congress who called her out for belittling the worst terror attack on America soil .
Since 2012 , Omar has also faced accusations of anti-Semitism .
Ocasio-Cortez has also been recently accused of anti-Semitism after boycotting a pro-peace event to honor assassinated Israeli Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin that was organized by a left-wing group .
After cancelling her participation in the event , Ocasio-Cortez refused to meet with members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have their own Twitch channels , including President Trump , which they use for non-gaming purposes , such as streaming rallies and other events , Fox reported .
The president was suspended from Twitch for “ hateful conduct ” carried on his stream .

Omar backs American Islamic State jihadis – so how far away is “America deserved 9/11”?
AOC, Omar join gamer who said ‘America deserved 9/11’
Radical congresswomen push message to vote, but do it online with vlogger who said America ‘deserved’ infamous terror attack.
By World Israel News Staff, October 22, 2020:
Congresswomen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar went on the popular gaming platform Twitch with a social media personality who gained notoriety for saying that “America deserved 9/11,” Fox News reported Thursday.
AOC and Omar were joined by Hasan Piker, who in a tirade last year against Republican Congressman Dan Crenshaw said “America deserved 9/11, dude. F— it, I’m saying it.”
Piker later apologized for the statement and tried to blame it on English being his second language.
The congresswomen went online to join a group of gamers playing the streaming game “Among Us” with the goal of getting Twitch’s young audience to vote in the Nov. 3 election.
AOC, Omar join gamer who said ‘America deserved 9/11’
Piker is a video blogger, or vlogger, on Twitch, a massive streaming service that focuses primarily on video games and is estimated to have 15 million or more daily active users.
Before Twitch, Piker was a contributor to Young Turks, a left-wing news and opinion channel on YouTube. On a Twitch stream last year, Piker lashed out at Crenshaw’s opposition to halting arms sales to Saudi Arabia.
As a result of the 9/11 comment Twitch suspended Piker, who claimed his comments were taken out of context.
Last year, Omar got into hot water for saying “some people did something” in reference to the 9/11 attacks during a speech in front of the the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in the infamous “Holy Land” terrorism case.
Omar’s comments at the CAIR event prompted furious responses from members of Congress who called her out for belittling the worst terror attack on America soil.
Since 2012, Omar has also faced accusations of anti-Semitism.
Ocasio-Cortez has also been recently accused of anti-Semitism after boycotting a pro-peace event to honor assassinated Israeli Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin that was organized by a left-wing group.
After cancelling her participation in the event, Ocasio-Cortez refused to meet with members of the Jewish community.
Other lawmakers have their own Twitch channels, including President Trump, which they use for non-gaming purposes, such as streaming rallies and other events, Fox reported.
The president was suspended from Twitch for “hateful conduct” carried on his stream.


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-23--Biden Pledged to End the American Oil Industry During Debate

Fracking too .
The tens of thousands of people who work in the oil and fracking industries in Pennsylvania and Ohio , better come out for President Trump in a big way on November 3rd .
That is because their jobs are on the line .
Literally .
Biden Declares He Would ‘ Transition ’ America Away from Oil Industry during Debate President Trump and rival Joe Biden sparred over environmental policy at the end of the presidential debate on Thursday , with Biden indicating he would “ transition ” away from dependence on oil .
“ Would he close @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked .
“ Would you close down the oil industry ?
” “ I would transition from the oil industry , yes , ” Biden responded .
However , the former vice president proceeded to deny that he would ban fracking , despite having promised to do so several times during the Democratic primaries .
While Trump pointed out that Biden had said he would ban fracking , Biden asserted that he would ban “ fracking on federal land…no fracking and/or oil on federal land.
” Biden ’ s “ plan is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ If you look at what he wants to do , if you look at his environmental plan—you know who developed it ?
A.O.C .
plus three .
”

Fracking too. The tens of thousands of people who work in the oil and fracking industries in Pennsylvania and Ohio, better come out for President Trump in a big way on November 3rd. That is because their jobs are on the line. Literally.
Biden Declares He Would ‘Transition’ America Away from Oil Industry during Debate By National Review, October 22, 2020 President Trump and rival Joe Biden sparred over environmental policy at the end of the presidential debate on Thursday, with Biden indicating he would “transition” away from dependence on oil. “Would he close down the oil industry?” Trump asked. “Would you close down the oil industry?” “I would transition from the oil industry, yes,” Biden responded. “That’s a big statement,” Trump commented. “It is a big statement, because…the oil industry pollutes, significantly,” Biden responded. “It has to be replaced by renewable energy over time,” Biden added. “And I’d stop giving to the oil industry—I’d stop giving them federal subsidies. [Trump] won’t give federal subsidies to solar and wind. Why are we giving it to the oil industry?” However, the former vice president proceeded to deny that he would ban fracking, despite having promised to do so several times during the Democratic primaries. While Trump pointed out that Biden had said he would ban fracking, Biden asserted that he would ban “fracking on federal land…no fracking and/or oil on federal land.” Biden’s “plan is an economic disaster,” Trump said. “If you look at what he wants to do, if you look at his environmental plan—you know who developed it? A.O.C. plus three.”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-23--Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court Nomination Advanced by Senate Committee

Move comes over objection of Democrats to Republicans ’ quickly filling Supreme Court opening WASHINGTON—The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced Amy Coney Barrett ’ s nomination to the Supreme Court as Republicans unanimously voted to recommend that the full Senate approve her , paving the way for her confirmation next week .
The tally was 12-0 .
All 10 Democrats on the panel declined to appear at the proceedings to protest the Republican plan to fill the position just ahead of a presidential election .
The committee action clears the way for a full Senate vote that is expected on Monday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ R. , Ky. ) is expected to take the rare step of keeping the chamber in session over the weekend in order to limit the opportunities for Democrats to delay the vote .
If confirmed as expected , Judge Barrett would give the Supreme Court a solid conservative majority that could affect the role of government , the rights of individuals , and the interpretation of such long-debated constitutional terms as equal protection , due process of law , and cruel and unusual punishment .
Democrats fear that she could provide a crucial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or undercutting the Affordable Care Act .
Instead of attending the vote Thursday , Democrats displayed cardboard photos of Americans with health conditions , people they said could be affected if the ACA is rolled back .
Judge Barrett is likely to be on the court in time to hear Nov. 10 oral arguments in a case challenging a central pillar of the ACA .

Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court Nomination Advanced by Senate Committee
Move comes over objection of Democrats to Republicans’ quickly filling Supreme Court opening
Amy Coney Barrett’s Nomination Heads for a Full Senate Vote
By Siobhan Hughes, Wall Street Journal, Oct. 22, 2020:
WASHINGTON—The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court as Republicans unanimously voted to recommend that the full Senate approve her, paving the way for her confirmation next week.
The tally was 12-0. All 10 Democrats on the panel declined to appear at the proceedings to protest the Republican plan to fill the position just ahead of a presidential election.
The committee action clears the way for a full Senate vote that is expected on Monday. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) is expected to take the rare step of keeping the chamber in session over the weekend in order to limit the opportunities for Democrats to delay the vote.
If confirmed as expected, Judge Barrett would give the Supreme Court a solid conservative majority that could affect the role of government, the rights of individuals, and the interpretation of such long-debated constitutional terms as equal protection, due process of law, and cruel and unusual punishment.
Democrats fear that she could provide a crucial vote in favor of restricting abortion rights or undercutting the Affordable Care Act.
Instead of attending the vote Thursday, Democrats displayed cardboard photos of Americans with health conditions, people they said could be affected if the ACA is rolled back. Judge Barrett is likely to be on the court in time to hear Nov. 10 oral arguments in a case challenging a central pillar of the ACA.


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--BREAKING: Videos Emerge of Hunter Biden Sex Tapes while Smoking Crack

Which is more disgusting : Hunter or the criminal enemedia covering up for this depraved pedo ?
China ’ s GTV loaded video of Joe Biden ’ s son Hunter Biden smoking crack cocaine while engaging in sex with an unknown person .
GTV announced they will be releasing more video .
The first GTV video is titled : Exclusive !
Hunter Biden ’ s Sex Tapes , The CCP ’ s “ BGY ” Infiltration in the U.S. , Evil Alliance to Dominate the World GTV announced they will be releasing more video .
The video was loaded on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he left at a computer shop in Delaware last year .
This message was scrolled at the end of the video .
And now there is video of Hunter taking a selfie while having sex .
He included this photo on his laptop from hell .
He included this photo on his laptop from hell .
And there is another video of Hunter taking a penis shot .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Which is more disgusting: Hunter or the criminal enemedia covering up for this depraved pedo?
China’s GTV Releases Videos of Hunter Biden Sex Tapes while Smoking Crack By Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, October 24, 2020: China’s GTV loaded video of Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden smoking crack cocaine while engaging in sex with an unknown person. GTV is a Chinese channel in Mandarin. GTV announced they will be releasing more video. WARNING ON CONTENT!! The first GTV video is titled: Exclusive! Hunter Biden’s Sex Tapes, The CCP’s “BGY” Infiltration in the U.S., Evil Alliance to Dominate the World GTV announced they will be releasing more video. The video was loaded on Hunter Biden’s laptop from hell that he left at a computer shop in Delaware last year. This message was scrolled at the end of the video.
UPDATE: Breaking from The Gateway Pundit:
And now there is video of Hunter taking a selfie while having sex. He included this photo on his laptop from hell. He included this photo on his laptop from hell. And there is another video of Hunter taking a penis shot.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--Shock Poll: Trump Down One Point Among Black Voters in Battleground Michigan

The time and resources President Trump ’ s campaign has been pouring into the battleground state of Michigan appear to be paying off , according to two new polls .
Zia Poll surveyed “ 2851 likely voters and newly registered voters who have never voted in an election ” and found Trump leading Joe Biden , 49 percent to 45 percent , for a four-point lead .
The poll found 85 percent of Trump supporters were “ very excited ” about their candidate , while only 70 percent of Biden supporters are so .
Regarding the economy , 55 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ better ” one .
Forty-five percent of those surveyed said Biden would .
Respondents “ were almost evenly split ” about whether Michigan Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer ( D ) or Trump better handled the coronavirus pandemic response .
The poll also found Biden with a “ slight ” lead among black and Hispanic voters .
Painter Communications analyzed the poll and told Breitbart News Biden had the support of 46.8 percent of black respondents , while Trump was at 45.7 percent , a difference of just 1.1 percent .
Denise Painter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , while 39.4 support Trump .
Trafalgar Group , on behalf of Restoration PAC , found Trump with a 1.8 percent lead , 46.7 percent to 44.9 percent .
Libertarian Jo Jorgensen had the support of 2.7 percent of respondents .
Just 2.3 percent said they were undecided .
That poll surveyed 1,034 likely voters and had a margin of error of +/- 2.97 percent .
That poll also found Republican Senate challenger John James flirting with breaking the all-important 50 percent threshold .
James led Democrat incumbent Sen. Gary Peters 49.7 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of respondents said they were undecided .

The time and resources President Trump’s campaign has been pouring into the battleground state of Michigan appear to be paying off, according to two new polls.
Zia Poll surveyed “2851 likely voters and newly registered voters who have never voted in an election” and found Trump leading Joe Biden, 49 percent to 45 percent, for a four-point lead.
MICHIGAN
Trump 49% (+4)
Biden 45% Zia Poll, LV, 10/11-18https://t.co/esjBX01ujS — Political Polls (@Politics_Polls) October 23, 2020
The poll found 85 percent of Trump supporters were “very excited” about their candidate, while only 70 percent of Biden supporters are so.
Regarding the economy, 55 percent of respondents said Trump would provide a “better” one. Forty-five percent of those surveyed said Biden would.
Respondents “were almost evenly split” about whether Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) or Trump better handled the coronavirus pandemic response.
The poll also found Biden with a “slight” lead among black and Hispanic voters.
Painter Communications analyzed the poll and told Breitbart News Biden had the support of 46.8 percent of black respondents, while Trump was at 45.7 percent, a difference of just 1.1 percent.
Denise Painter said 44.7 percent of Hispanics back Biden, while 39.4 support Trump.
Trafalgar Group, on behalf of Restoration PAC, found Trump with a 1.8 percent lead, 46.7 percent to 44.9 percent.
Libertarian Jo Jorgensen had the support of 2.7 percent of respondents. Just 2.3 percent said they were undecided. That poll surveyed 1,034 likely voters and had a margin of error of +/- 2.97 percent.
That poll also found Republican Senate challenger John James flirting with breaking the all-important 50 percent threshold.
James led Democrat incumbent Sen. Gary Peters 49.7 percent to 47.5 percent. Only 1.4 percent of respondents said they were undecided.


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--WE WON! UNANIMOUS DECISION IN GELLER VS DETROIT: Sixth Circuit UNEQUIVOCALLY Strikes Down Transporta

WE WON! UNANIMOUS DECISION IN GELLER VS DETROIT: Sixth Circuit UNEQUIVOCALLY Strikes Down Transportation Agency’s Ban on AFDI Free Speech Ads

The Sixth Circuit Court just completely reversed the SMART judgment !
Total unabashed victory !
It took twelve years , but we did it .
We won our free speech lawsuit in Detroit by a unanimous decision .
You would never know it .
No media covered it .
If we lost , there would be huge pieces on how sharia restrictions on speech are altogether reasonable — as heads roll ( literally ) .
First a recap : back in 2009 , Detroit Transit and SMART transit refused to run our AFDI ads .
We sued , we won @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refusing to run outreach ads that might help Muslims living in dangerous households .
You might think that the Muslim Brotherhood was running SMART Detroit .
It is astounding .
And consider Detroit ’ s bankruptcy , sharia adherence is more important than freedom of speech and fiscal responsibility .
The Sixth circuit heard the appeal and called our religious ads political , and so the case went on .
I was deposed and harassed for six hours by a small , profane blowhard attorney — all billable hours to fight an ad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violence .
And the deposition was so hostile , you would think I committed a heinous crime .
Apparently , blasphemy in America is .
Bottom line , everyone has the same right to a free life .
The Sixth Circuit agreed .
Jessica Mokdad , an honor killing victim living in that area at the time , might have been saved .
We know the ads have helped Muslims — they told us .
The ads save lives .
Contribute here .
• AFDI Lawsuit : Motion Asking Michigan Federal Court to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Bus Ad Violates the U.S. Constitution • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rules AFDI Islam ad is political Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Transportation Agency ’ s Exclusion on “ Political ” Ads and Ones That “ Scorn or Ridicule ” The case involved an anti-Islam ad ; the court reversed its earlier decision in favor of the transportation agency , based on two more recent Supreme Court decisions .
American Freedom Defensive Initiative v. Suburban Mobility Auth .
for Regional Transp .
( 6th Cir . )
, written @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Judges Cole and Siler ; I think this is analysis is quite correct : The Free Speech Clause limits the government ’ s power to regulate speech on public property .
The government has little leeway to restrict speech in “ public forums ” : properties like parks or streets that are open to speech by tradition or design .
It has wider latitude to restrict speech in “ nonpublic forums ” that have not been opened to debate .
Even there , however , speech restrictions must be reasonable and viewpoint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
v. Mansky ( 2018 ) .
In this case , we must consider how these rules apply to the restrictions that a public-transit authority imposes on parties who seek to display advertisements on its buses .
The American Freedom Defense Initiative sought to run an ad that said : “ Fatwa on your head ?
Is your family or community threatening you ?
Leaving Islam ?
Got Questions ?
Get Answers !
RefugefromIslam.com.
” Michigan ’ s Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation ( SMART ) rejected this ad under two of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ political ” ads ; the second prohibits ads that would hold up a group of people to “ scorn or ridicule.
” Earlier in this case [ in 2012 ] , we found , first , that the advertising space on SMART ’ s buses is a nonpublic forum and , second , that SMART likely could show that its restrictions were reasonable and viewpoint neutral .
Since then , the Supreme Court has issued a pair of decisions that compel us to change course on our second conclusion .
SMART ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is unreasonable for the same reason that a state ’ s ban on “ political ” apparel at polling places is unreasonable : SMART offers no “ sensible basis for distinguishing what may come in from what must stay out.
” Mansky .
Likewise , SMART ’ s ban on ads that engage in “ scorn or ridicule ” is not viewpoint neutral for the same reason that a ban on trademarks that disparage people is not viewpoint neutral : For any group , “ an applicant may [ display ] a positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a derogatory one.
” Matal v. Tam ( 2017 ) .
We thus reverse the district court ’ s decision rejecting the First Amendment challenge to these two restrictions… .
Speech restrictions in nonpublic forums must be reasonable and viewpoint neutral… .
Mansky shows how this test applies to a speech restriction analogous to the one at issue here .
That case addressed a Minnesota law that banned voters from wearing “ political ” apparel at polling places .
The Court treated polling places as nonpublic forums .
When applying this reasonableness test @ @ @ @ @ @ @ permissible ends because the state could reasonably seek to reinforce the solemnity of voting .
Voters “ reach considered decisions about their government , ” and states can reasonably conclude that the location of this “ weighty civic act ” should be free of “ partisan discord.
” But the Court next held that Minnesota had not used reasonable means to implement these ends because its ban on “ political ” apparel was not “ capable of reasoned application.
” On its face , the word “ political ” has no clear meaning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reach , Minnesota interpreted it more narrowly to cover only those messages that a reasonable observer would view as related to the electoral choices in a given election .
Yet a separate law already banned campaign materials .
This “ political ” ban thus covered more : things like “ issues ” on which a candidate had taken a stance or “ groups ” that had political views .
That ambiguous definition , however , “ pose [ d ] riddles that even the State ’ s top lawyers struggle [ d ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example , that a shirt with the Second Amendment ’ s words would be “ political , ” but a shirt with the First Amendment ’ s words would not be .
These nonobvious distinctions led the Court to conclude that the “ political ” ban could not be objectively applied .
Instead , the ban gave election judges at each polling place too much “ discretion ” to decide what qualified as “ political.
” The Court concluded that states “ must employ a more discernible approach than the one Minnesota @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to adopt a “ more discernible approach.
” To be sure , like the law in Mansky , SMART ’ s ban on “ political ” ads serves “ permissible ” ends .
SMART seeks “ to minimize chances of abuse , the appearance of favoritism , and the risk of imposing upon a captive audience [ . ]
” Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights ( 1974 ) found similar objectives permissible .
Nevertheless , SMART must adopt “ objective , workable standards ” to achieve its permissible ends .
And like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s speech restriction combines the same “ unmoored use of the term ‘ political ' ” with the same risk of “ haphazard interpretations.
” First , SMART can not rely on its Advertising Guidelines ’ unadorned use of the word “ political ” to create workable standards by itself .
The word has a range of meanings .
It can have an “ expansive ” reach , covering “ anything ‘ [ o ] f , relating to , or dealing with the structure or affairs of government , politics , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ however , does not follow this broad reading .
Under this definition , even get-out-the-vote drives or public-service announcements encouraging individuals to report drunk drivers would qualify .
Yet SMART allows such public-issue ads .
The word alternatively can have a narrower reach , covering anything “ [ r ] elating to , involving , or characteristic of political parties or politicians : a political campaign.
” But SMART does not interpret the word this way either… .
Second , SMART can not rely on any official guidance to create workable standards .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ has no other sources defining the word “ political ” or telling officials how to apply it… .
Third , SMART ’ s made-for-litigation definition of “ political ” also can not provide workable standards .
When asked to give SMART ’ s official definition , its designee defined the word as “ any advocacy of a position of any politicized issue.
” The designee defined the word “ politicized ” this way : “ [ I ] f society is fractured on an issue and factions of society have taken up positions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it ’ s politicized.
” He added that an ad must be “ advocacy of one of those viewpoints on the issue.
” We think that this definition is subject to the same risk of “ haphazard interpretations ” that Mansky found unacceptable… .
[ T ] he subjective enforcement of an “ indeterminate prohibition ” increases the “ opportunity for abuse ” in its application .
The First Amendment favors rules over standards because the former make an administrator ’ s job largely ministerial whereas the latter leave room for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” And “ the danger of censorship and of abridgment of our precious First Amendment freedoms is too great where officials have unbridled discretion over a forum ’ s use.
” As in Mansky , we do not question that SMART seeks to act in an “ evenhanded manner , ” but it has yet to create the workable standards that it needs for “ reasoned application ” of its ban… .
SMART alternatively rejected AFDI ’ s fatwa ad under a restriction prohibiting ads that could hold a group of people up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shows that this rationale has a free- speech problem of its own : It discriminates on the basis of viewpoint… .
The Court has held that viewpoint discrimination exists even when the government does not target a narrow view on a narrow subject and instead enacts a more general restriction—such as a ban on all “ religious ” speech or on all “ offensive ” speech [ expressing `` ideas that offend ” ] … .
Like the trademark statute prohibiting marks that bring individuals into “ disrepute , ” SMART ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to hold up to scorn or ridicule any person or group of persons.
” This restriction necessarily discriminates between viewpoints .
For any group , the restriction facially “ distinguishes between two opposed sets of ideas ” : those that promote the group and those that disparage it .
Iancu v. Brunetti ( 2019 ) .
SMART has applied its restriction in the same way .
It , for example , has run an ad that promotes attendance at a local church .
But the scorn-and-ridicule guideline would compel SMART to ban an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Similarly , SMART conceded that an ad implying that Islam is a “ religion of peace ” likely would not violate its scorn-or-ridicule restriction .
Yet SMART found that AFDI ’ s ad violated the restriction because it implied that Islam was violent by suggesting that members of the faith would threaten family members .
On its face and as applied , therefore , SMART ’ s restriction engages in impermissible viewpoint discrimination… .
Like the speech regulations in Mansky and Matal , SMART ’ s two restrictions in this case are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to generate revenue , not to lose it .
And political ads that advocate for positions with which large segments of SMART ’ s customer base disagree or that disparage large segments of that base might well cause some to choose other transit options .
But our response to these concerns can be no different from the Supreme Court ’ s response to them .
As the Court made clear in Mansky , SMART must “ strike the balance ” between protecting its riders ’ tranquility and its advertisers ’ expression in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And “ as the Court made clear in [ Matal ] a [ s [ speech restriction ] isfavoring ‘ ideas that offend ’ discriminates based on viewpoint , in violation of the First Amendment.
” Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Ban on Political Speech in Bus Ads CINCINNATI ( CN ) — An appeals court panel sided with a conservative free speech group Friday and ruled a Detroit-area public transit authority ’ s ban on political speech in ads violates the First Amendment because such speech is not clearly defined .
The American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation , or SMART , in 2010 , after two of its proposed ads regarding Islam were rejected for placement on buses .
The ads were part of an outreach by AFDI to Muslims who wanted to leave the Islamic faith and promoted the website RefugefromIslam.com .
AFDI was initially successful and obtained an injunction from a federal judge , but the Sixth Circuit overturned the ruling in 2012 and held SMART had enacted a permissible total ban on political advertising .
Discovery was conducted following a remand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Judge Denise Hood sided with SMART in a 2019 decision after she determined the buses are a nonpublic forum .
The case was argued before a different panel of Sixth Circuit judges in December 2019 , and Friday ’ s ruling focused heavily on recent Supreme Court decisions , including the 2018 case Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky .
Mansky involved a ban on political apparel at polling locations , but the Supreme Court struck the law down as unconstitutional because of the lack of a definition of the term “ political.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an appointee of President Donald Trump , wrote that the Mansky decision required he and his colleagues to invalidate SMART ’ s political speech restriction and reverse the decision of the district court .
Murphy conceded that in a nonpublic forum , a government restriction on speech need only be reasonable to pass constitutional muster , but pointed out that SMART ’ s failure to precisely define political speech runs afoul of the precedent established in Mansky .
“ The word [ [ ‘ political ’ ] as a range of meanings , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have an ‘ expansive ’ reach , covering ‘ anything of , relating to , or dealing with the structure or affairs of government , politics , or the state.
’ SMART , however , does not follow this broad reading .
Under this definition , even get-out-the-vote drives or public-service announcements encouraging individuals to report drunk drivers would qualify .
Yet SMART allows such public-issue ads.
” Murphy also explained that SMART ’ s failure to adequately define political speech has led to an erratic and inconsistent application of its advertising guidelines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was allowed by the transit authority as an example .
“ Are fractions of society fractured on the existence of God , such that members of society have taken up different positions on the issue ?
Yes , a range of views exists .
Does this ad ‘ advocate ’ for one of those views ?
One could reasonably read it as promoting the view that God does not exist , ” he wrote .
The judge added , “ In fact , members of the public complained about the ad and drivers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When one considers that the Detroit Area Coalition of Reason advocates for the separation of church and state , it is not at all clear why SMART ’ s definition permits this ad.
” Murphy said the lack of a workable definition has forced SMART to “ apply the ban on the fly ” as each ad is presented to it , which can not be allowed under the Supreme Court ’ s decision in Mansky .
SMART had also argued that it rejected the AFDI ad because it subjected a group of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – to “ scorn or ridicule , ” but the panel rejected the argument and held the transit authority ’ s application of this standard would be viewpoint discrimination .
“ SMART conceded , ” Murphy wrote , “ that an ad implying that Islam is a ‘ religion of peace ’ likely would not violate its scorn-or-ridicule restriction .
Yet SMART found that AFDI ’ s ad violated the restriction because it implied that Islam was violent by suggesting that members of the faith would threaten family members .
On its face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s restriction engages in impermissible viewpoint discrimination.
” In his conclusion , Murphy called SMART ’ s attempts at restrictions on divisive speech “ understandable , ” but nevertheless said the agency must find a reasonable way to enforce its advertising guidelines that protects its ridership but does not infringe on advertisers ’ First Amendment rights .
Chief U.S .
Circuit Judge R. Guy Cole Jr. , a Bill Clinton appointee , and Senior U.S .
Circuit Judge Eugene Siler Jr. , a George H.W .
Bush appointee , joined Murphy on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responded to a request for comment .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

The Sixth Circuit Court just completely reversed the SMART judgment! Total unabashed victory!
It took twelve years, but we did it. We won our free speech lawsuit in Detroit by a unanimous decision. You would never know it. No media covered it. If we lost, there would be huge pieces on how sharia restrictions on speech are altogether reasonable — as heads roll (literally).
First a recap: back in 2009, Detroit Transit and SMART transit refused to run our AFDI ads. We sued, we won, and they appealed. SMART was refusing to run outreach ads that might help Muslims living in dangerous households. You might think that the Muslim Brotherhood was running SMART Detroit. It is astounding. And consider Detroit’s bankruptcy, sharia adherence is more important than freedom of speech and fiscal responsibility.
The Sixth circuit heard the appeal and called our religious ads political, and so the case went on. I was deposed and harassed for six hours by a small, profane blowhard attorney — all billable hours to fight an ad created to help Muslim girls escape honor violence. And the deposition was so hostile, you would think I committed a heinous crime. Apparently, blasphemy in America is.
Bottom line, everyone has the same right to a free life. The Sixth Circuit agreed.
Jessica Mokdad, an honor killing victim living in that area at the time, might have been saved. We know the ads have helped Muslims — they told us. The ads save lives. Contribute here.
Scroll:
Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Transportation Agency’s Exclusion on “Political” Ads and Ones That “Scorn or Ridicule” The case involved an anti-Islam ad; the court reversed its earlier decision in favor of the transportation agency, based on two more recent Supreme Court decisions. Eugene Volokh |The Volokh Conspiracy | 10.23.2020: American Freedom Defensive Initiative v. Suburban Mobility Auth. for Regional Transp. (6th Cir.), written by Sixth Circuit Judge Murphy and joined by Judges Cole and Siler; I think this is analysis is quite correct: The Free Speech Clause limits the government’s power to regulate speech on public property. The government has little leeway to restrict speech in “public forums”: properties like parks or streets that are open to speech by tradition or design. It has wider latitude to restrict speech in “nonpublic forums” that have not been opened to debate. Even there, however, speech restrictions must be reasonable and viewpoint neutral. See Minn. Voters All. v. Mansky (2018). In this case, we must consider how these rules apply to the restrictions that a public-transit authority imposes on parties who seek to display advertisements on its buses. The American Freedom Defense Initiative sought to run an ad that said: “Fatwa on your head? Is your family or community threatening you? Leaving Islam? Got Questions? Get Answers! RefugefromIslam.com.” Michigan’s Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) rejected this ad under two of its speech restrictions. The first prohibits “political” ads; the second prohibits ads that would hold up a group of people to “scorn or ridicule.” Earlier in this case [in 2012], we found, first, that the advertising space on SMART’s buses is a nonpublic forum and, second, that SMART likely could show that its restrictions were reasonable and viewpoint neutral. Since then, the Supreme Court has issued a pair of decisions that compel us to change course on our second conclusion. SMART’s ban on “political” ads is unreasonable for the same reason that a state’s ban on “political” apparel at polling places is unreasonable: SMART offers no “sensible basis for distinguishing what may come in from what must stay out.” Mansky. Likewise, SMART’s ban on ads that engage in “scorn or ridicule” is not viewpoint neutral for the same reason that a ban on trademarks that disparage people is not viewpoint neutral: For any group, “an applicant may [display] a positive or benign [ad] but not a derogatory one.” Matal v. Tam (2017). We thus reverse the district court’s decision rejecting the First Amendment challenge to these two restrictions….
Speech restrictions in nonpublic forums must be reasonable and viewpoint neutral…. Mansky shows how this test applies to a speech restriction analogous to the one at issue here. That case addressed a Minnesota law that banned voters from wearing “political” apparel at polling places. The Court treated polling places as nonpublic forums. When applying this reasonableness test, it found that Minnesota had pursued permissible ends because the state could reasonably seek to reinforce the solemnity of voting. Voters “reach considered decisions about their government,” and states can reasonably conclude that the location of this “weighty civic act” should be free of “partisan discord.” But the Court next held that Minnesota had not used reasonable means to implement these ends because its ban on “political” apparel was not “capable of reasoned application.” On its face, the word “political” has no clear meaning. Although it can have a broad reach, Minnesota interpreted it more narrowly to cover only those messages that a reasonable observer would view as related to the electoral choices in a given election. Yet a separate law already banned campaign materials. This “political” ban thus covered more: things like “issues” on which a candidate had taken a stance or “groups” that had political views. That ambiguous definition, however, “pose[d] riddles that even the State’s top lawyers struggle[d] to solve.” The lawyers suggested, for example, that a shirt with the Second Amendment’s words would be “political,” but a shirt with the First Amendment’s words would not be. These nonobvious distinctions led the Court to conclude that the “political” ban could not be objectively applied. Instead, the ban gave election judges at each polling place too much “discretion” to decide what qualified as “political.” The Court concluded that states “must employ a more discernible approach than the one Minnesota has offered here.” SMART has failed to adopt a “more discernible approach.” To be sure, like the law in Mansky, SMART’s ban on “political” ads serves “permissible” ends. SMART seeks “to minimize chances of abuse, the appearance of favoritism, and the risk of imposing upon a captive audience[.]” Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights (1974) found similar objectives permissible. Nevertheless, SMART must adopt “objective, workable standards” to achieve its permissible ends. And like the law in Mansky, SMART’s speech restriction combines the same “unmoored use of the term ‘political'” with the same risk of “haphazard interpretations.” First, SMART cannot rely on its Advertising Guidelines’ unadorned use of the word “political” to create workable standards by itself. The word has a range of meanings. It can have an “expansive” reach, covering “anything ‘[o]f, relating to, or dealing with the structure or affairs of government, politics, or the state.'” SMART, however, does not follow this broad reading. Under this definition, even get-out-the-vote drives or public-service announcements encouraging individuals to report drunk drivers would qualify. Yet SMART allows such public-issue ads. The word alternatively can have a narrower reach, covering anything “[r]elating to, involving, or characteristic of political parties or politicians: a political campaign.” But SMART does not interpret the word this way either…. Second, SMART cannot rely on any official guidance to create workable standards. Apart from its Advertising Guidelines, SMART has no other sources defining the word “political” or telling officials how to apply it…. Third, SMART’s made-for-litigation definition of “political” also cannot provide workable standards. When asked to give SMART’s official definition, its designee defined the word as “any advocacy of a position of any politicized issue.” The designee defined the word “politicized” this way: “[I]f society is fractured on an issue and factions of society have taken up positions on it that are not in agreement, it’s politicized.” He added that an ad must be “advocacy of one of those viewpoints on the issue.” We think that this definition is subject to the same risk of “haphazard interpretations” that Mansky found unacceptable…. [T]he subjective enforcement of an “indeterminate prohibition” increases the “opportunity for abuse” in its application. The First Amendment favors rules over standards because the former make an administrator’s job largely ministerial whereas the latter leave room for the administrator to rely on “impermissible factors.” And “the danger of censorship and of abridgment of our precious First Amendment freedoms is too great where officials have unbridled discretion over a forum’s use.” As in Mansky, we do not question that SMART seeks to act in an “evenhanded manner,” but it has yet to create the workable standards that it needs for “reasoned application” of its ban…. SMART alternatively rejected AFDI’s fatwa ad under a restriction prohibiting ads that could hold a group of people up to “scorn or ridicule.” Matal shows that this rationale has a free- speech problem of its own: It discriminates on the basis of viewpoint…. The Court has held that viewpoint discrimination exists even when the government does not target a narrow view on a narrow subject and instead enacts a more general restriction—such as a ban on all “religious” speech or on all “offensive” speech [expressing “ideas that offend”]…. Like the trademark statute prohibiting marks that bring individuals into “disrepute,” SMART’s restriction prohibits ads that are “likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule any person or group of persons.” This restriction necessarily discriminates between viewpoints. For any group, the restriction facially “distinguishes between two opposed sets of ideas”: those that promote the group and those that disparage it. Iancu v. Brunetti (2019). SMART has applied its restriction in the same way. It, for example, has run an ad that promotes attendance at a local church. But the scorn-and-ridicule guideline would compel SMART to ban an ad ridiculing those who attend this church. Similarly, SMART conceded that an ad implying that Islam is a “religion of peace” likely would not violate its scorn-or-ridicule restriction. Yet SMART found that AFDI’s ad violated the restriction because it implied that Islam was violent by suggesting that members of the faith would threaten family members. On its face and as applied, therefore, SMART’s restriction engages in impermissible viewpoint discrimination…. Like the speech regulations in Mansky and Matal, SMART’s two restrictions in this case are “understandable.” SMART sells advertising space to generate revenue, not to lose it. And political ads that advocate for positions with which large segments of SMART’s customer base disagree or that disparage large segments of that base might well cause some to choose other transit options. But our response to these concerns can be no different from the Supreme Court’s response to them. As the Court made clear in Mansky, SMART must “strike the balance” between protecting its riders’ tranquility and its advertisers’ expression in a way that permits “reasoned application.” And “as the Court made clear in [Matal], a [speech restriction] disfavoring ‘ideas that offend’ discriminates based on viewpoint, in violation of the First Amendment.”
Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Ban on Political Speech in Bus Ads
By: Courthouse News, October 23, 2020:
CINCINNATI (CN) — An appeals court panel sided with a conservative free speech group Friday and ruled a Detroit-area public transit authority’s ban on political speech in ads violates the First Amendment because such speech is not clearly defined. The American Freedom Defense Initiative filed suit against the Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation, or SMART, in 2010, after two of its proposed ads regarding Islam were rejected for placement on buses. The ads were part of an outreach by AFDI to Muslims who wanted to leave the Islamic faith and promoted the website RefugefromIslam.com. AFDI was initially successful and obtained an injunction from a federal judge, but the Sixth Circuit overturned the ruling in 2012 and held SMART had enacted a permissible total ban on political advertising. Discovery was conducted following a remand to federal court, and U.S. District Judge Denise Hood sided with SMART in a 2019 decision after she determined the buses are a nonpublic forum. The case was argued before a different panel of Sixth Circuit judges in December 2019, and Friday’s ruling focused heavily on recent Supreme Court decisions, including the 2018 case Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky. Mansky involved a ban on political apparel at polling locations, but the Supreme Court struck the law down as unconstitutional because of the lack of a definition of the term “political.” U.S. Circuit Judge Eric Murphy, an appointee of President Donald Trump, wrote that the Mansky decision required he and his colleagues to invalidate SMART’s political speech restriction and reverse the decision of the district court. Murphy conceded that in a nonpublic forum, a government restriction on speech need only be reasonable to pass constitutional muster, but pointed out that SMART’s failure to precisely define political speech runs afoul of the precedent established in Mansky. “The word [‘political’] has a range of meanings,” Murphy said. “It can have an ‘expansive’ reach, covering ‘anything of, relating to, or dealing with the structure or affairs of government, politics, or the state.’ SMART, however, does not follow this broad reading. Under this definition, even get-out-the-vote drives or public-service announcements encouraging individuals to report drunk drivers would qualify. Yet SMART allows such public-issue ads.” Murphy also explained that SMART’s failure to adequately define political speech has led to an erratic and inconsistent application of its advertising guidelines, and cited an atheist ad that was allowed by the transit authority as an example. “Are fractions of society fractured on the existence of God, such that members of society have taken up different positions on the issue? Yes, a range of views exists. Does this ad ‘advocate’ for one of those views? One could reasonably read it as promoting the view that God does not exist,” he wrote. The judge added, “In fact, members of the public complained about the ad and drivers refused to drive buses displaying it. When one considers that the Detroit Area Coalition of Reason advocates for the separation of church and state, it is not at all clear why SMART’s definition permits this ad.” Murphy said the lack of a workable definition has forced SMART to “apply the ban on the fly” as each ad is presented to it, which cannot be allowed under the Supreme Court’s decision in Mansky. SMART had also argued that it rejected the AFDI ad because it subjected a group of people – in this case, Muslims – to “scorn or ridicule,” but the panel rejected the argument and held the transit authority’s application of this standard would be viewpoint discrimination. “SMART conceded,” Murphy wrote, “that an ad implying that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’ likely would not violate its scorn-or-ridicule restriction. Yet SMART found that AFDI’s ad violated the restriction because it implied that Islam was violent by suggesting that members of the faith would threaten family members. On its face and as applied, therefore, SMART’s restriction engages in impermissible viewpoint discrimination.” In his conclusion, Murphy called SMART’s attempts at restrictions on divisive speech “understandable,” but nevertheless said the agency must find a reasonable way to enforce its advertising guidelines that protects its ridership but does not infringe on advertisers’ First Amendment rights. Chief U.S. Circuit Judge R. Guy Cole Jr., a Bill Clinton appointee, and Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Eugene Siler Jr., a George H.W. Bush appointee, joined Murphy on the unanimous panel. Neither party immediately responded to a request for comment.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--Corrupt Joe Biden Calls Americans Who Don’t Support Him “CHUMPS”

“ To us , those goody-good people who worked sh*tty jobs for bum paychecks and took the subway to work every day and worried about their bills were dead .
I mean , they were suckers.
” ( Wiseguys ) https : //t.co/MIp2hiPBwP This chump never smoked crack , nor did he get high and leave a laptop lying around with evidence of massive corruption on it .
Have a tip we should know ?
Your anonymity is NEVER compromised .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .

Here is Biden’s “deplorable,” “irredeemable” moment.
Boom.
“To us, those goody-good people who worked sh*tty jobs for bum paychecks and took the subway to work every day and worried about their bills were dead. I mean, they were suckers.” (Wiseguys) https://t.co/MIp2hiPBwP
https://twitter.com/KurtSchlichter/status/1320060894223585280?s=20
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--WATCH: Trump grants clemency to former Gary boxer Charles ‘Duke’ Tanner imprisoned for drug crimes

Tanner said Thursday he found out he was getting released after the prison ’ s 4 p.m. stand up count Wednesday .
After his release , he was taken to a hotel room .
Friends later picked him up .
“ They came to my cell and said , ‘ We got ta take you.
’ I said , ‘ What ’ s going on ?
’ ‘ You ’ re getting an immediate release , ’ ” he said .
“ I got to say a prayer and praise God.
” Tanner said he was asking a lawyer to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 , but the paperwork hadn ’ t been filed yet .
State Sen. Eddie Melton , who knew him growing up , Tanner ’ s manager Troy Bly and his son C.J.
, now 18 , and others were in the Philadelphia airport , according to a video on Bly ’ s Facebook page Thursday .
“ Make sure that the President knows how grateful I am , ” Tanner said in a phone interview .
“ If you go to my boxing career , the second , third fight ( was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he said .
“ That ’ s the same guy giving me my clemency.
” When he was arrested , Tanner was an undefeated light heavyweight boxer from Gary who had been in a televised fight on ESPN .
Then 24 , he was one of the brightest talents to come through Gary ’ s storied Police Athletic League gym .

What a heartwarming story. Duke Tanner was given a life sentence for a non violent crime because of Joe Biden’s awful crime bill. Today Tanner is a free man because of the compassion of President Trump. President Trump is going to receive huge support from Black Americans on November 3rd. That is because he has done more for Black Americans than any POTUS since Lincoln.
Yesterday @realDonaldTrump granted Duke Tanner clemency after 16 years in prison He was sentenced to LIFE in prison for a FIRST time, NON VIOLENT crime because of Joe Biden’s crime bill Good luck with your SECOND CHANCE Let’s make this message go viral! pic.twitter.com/Z9p5Vioc8i — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) October 23, 2020
Trump grants clemency to former Gary boxer Charles ‘Duke’ Tanner imprisoned for drug crimes By Chicago Tribune, October 24, 2020 An ex-Gary boxer serving a 30-year sentence on federal drug and conspiracy convictions was granted clemency Wednesday by President Donald Trump. Charles “Duke” Tanner, 40, was released Wednesday from a Pennsylvania prison, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. His original release date was Oct. 20, 2030. He had lobbied unsuccessfully for years to cut his drug sentence short.
Tanner said Thursday he found out he was getting released after the prison’s 4 p.m. stand up count Wednesday. After his release, he was taken to a hotel room. Friends later picked him up. “They came to my cell and said, ‘We gotta take you.’ I said, ‘What’s going on?’ ‘You’re getting an immediate release,’” he said. “I got to say a prayer and praise God.” Tanner said he was asking a lawyer to petition for a compassionate release due to COVID-19, but the paperwork hadn’t been filed yet. State Sen. Eddie Melton, who knew him growing up, Tanner’s manager Troy Bly and his son C.J., now 18, and others were in the Philadelphia airport, according to a video on Bly’s Facebook page Thursday. “Make sure that the President knows how grateful I am,” Tanner said in a phone interview. “If you go to my boxing career, the second, third fight (was at the Trump-owned casino) in Gary,” he said. “That’s the same guy giving me my clemency.” For the time being, Tanner said he was headed to Indianapolis to be closer to his son. He wants to eventually get back in the ring. “The boxing world needs to watch out, because I still got it,” he said. When he was arrested, Tanner was an undefeated light heavyweight boxer from Gary who had been in a televised fight on ESPN. Then 24, he was one of the brightest talents to come through Gary’s storied Police Athletic League gym. Tanner was accused of leading the Renegades, a local gang that trafficked thousands of pounds of crack cocaine and marijuana, and was convicted in 2006 of conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine. He was originally sentenced to life imprisonment, which was converted to a 30-year sentence. He had served 16 years of the sentence. The U.S. Sentencing Commission changed the amounts of crack cocaine needed for certain terms in 2014, and the change was applied retroactively to Tanner. He tried for clemency during President Barack Obama’s administration, but that request was denied. Tanner’s arrest stunned those who knew him as a charming, church-going man many believed had the talent to become a world champion. Tanner, who had no prior criminal record, told FBI agents after his arrest that he had purchased nearly $700,000 worth of cocaine over the summer of 2004 in a series of deals with a supplier who became an FBI informant.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--Biden’s Shocking Rewrite of History to Normalize, Mainstream Hitler: “We Had a Good Relationship Wit

Biden’s Shocking Rewrite of History to Normalize, Mainstream Hitler: “We Had a Good Relationship With Hitler”

Biden says America “ had a good relationship with Hitler.
” We did not have a “ good relationship ” with that depraved monster .
During the final presidential debate Thursday night , Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden claimed that the United States “ had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe .
Biden appeared to be attempting to make a larger point about President Trump ’ s working relationship with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un , though in context it left many observers scratching their heads .
Though public sentiment in pre-WWII America was strongly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , particularly following the bloodbath of World War I , there was an overriding antipathy for Hitler and his Nazi party within the United States .
In September 1939 , as Hitler began his assault across Europe , U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt told the American people , “ This nation will remain a neutral nation , but I can not ask that every American remain neutral in thought as well.
” It was a thinly veiled acknowledgement of widespread national disdain for Germany and its leader .
Given these , and several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s consistent hostility towards Hitler ’ s regime , it is not immediately clear , barring a clumsy attempt at humor , what “ good relationship ” the former vice president was referring to .

Biden says America “had a good relationship with Hitler.” We did not have a “good relationship” with that depraved monster.
Biden says America “had a good relationship with Hitler” By Peter Heck, Disrn, Oct 23rd, 2020: During the final presidential debate Thursday night, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden claimed that the United States “had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe. Biden just said we had a good relationship with Hitler. This guy is straight-up senile. pic.twitter.com/yxnmDBScA9 — Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) October 23, 2020 Biden appeared to be attempting to make a larger point about President Trump’s working relationship with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un, though in context it left many observers scratching their heads. Biden employs Godwin's Law. It's like Trump caught the golden snitch. Debate over. — Larry O'Connor (@LarryOConnor) October 23, 2020 Very fine people on both sides. https://t.co/QZiEMQ2ntH — Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) October 23, 2020 We had a good relationship with Hitler? — Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) October 23, 2020 Though public sentiment in pre-WWII America was strongly opposed to any entanglement in European affairs, particularly following the bloodbath of World War I, there was an overriding antipathy for Hitler and his Nazi party within the United States. In September 1939, as Hitler began his assault across Europe, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt told the American people, “This nation will remain a neutral nation, but I cannot ask that every American remain neutral in thought as well.” It was a thinly veiled acknowledgement of widespread national disdain for Germany and its leader. Given these, and several other fairly well-established historical facts demonstrating America’s consistent hostility towards Hitler’s regime, it is not immediately clear, barring a clumsy attempt at humor, what “good relationship” the former vice president was referring to.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--Jihadis Celebrate Murder And Beheading Of Schoolteacher In France, Call On Muslims In Europe And The

Jihadis Celebrate Murder And Beheading Of Schoolteacher In France, Call On Muslims In Europe And The U.S. To Follow In Attacker’s Footsteps

More piety from the “ misunderstanding ” devout .
What untold number of people have to be murdered in order for the elites to candidly address the violence and hate in Islamic texts and teachings ?
Calls On Supporters To Incite Muslims In Europe And The U.S. To Follow In Attacker ’ s Footsteps MEMRI : Jihadis reacted enthusiastically online to the murder of French teacher Samuel Paty in a suburb of Paris on October 16 , 2020 , by a Chechen Islamist who was angered that the teacher showed his pupils drawings of the ‘ prophet ’ Muhammad .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporters of the Islamic State ( ISIS ) , threatened those who blaspheme against Muhammad .
Have a tip we should know ?
Your anonymity is NEVER compromised .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .

More piety from the “misunderstanding” devout.
What untold number of people have to be murdered in order for the elites to candidly address the violence and hate in Islamic texts and teachings?
Calls On Supporters To Incite Muslims In Europe And The U.S. To Follow In Attacker’s Footsteps
EXCLUSIVE: Jihadis Celebrate Murder And Decapitation Of Teacher In France
MEMRI: Jihadis reacted enthusiastically online to the murder of French teacher Samuel Paty in a suburb of Paris on October 16, 2020, by a Chechen Islamist who was angered that the teacher showed his pupils drawings of the ‘prophet’ Muhammad.
Related:
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots will count even if signatures don’t match

Unbelievable corruption from the Left .
Changing the rules of an election with just over a week is beyond disgraceful .
But this is the world that we live in because of the corrupt Dems , who know they can ’ t defeat President Trump fairly .
G-d help us if the Democrats take power on November 3rd .
Watch your back , Mr. President .
Vote in person , America .
Pennsylvania democrats are methodically changing the rules so they can steal the election .
It is amazingly open , dishonest , ruthless and will work unless the state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law enforcement .
Pa. Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots will count even if signatures don ’ t match Pennsylvania ’ s Supreme Court ruled Friday that election officials must accept mail-in ballots even if the signatures on them don ’ t match those on file for a voter .
The justices said nothing in the state ’ s laws required signatures to be verified , so if election officials are satisfied with the vote save for the signature , they can not reject it .
“ We , therefore , grant the Secretary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and direct the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting , computing , and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees , or as the result of third- party challenges based on such comparisons , ” Justice Debra Todd wrote in the opinion for a unanimous court .
President Trump ’ s campaign had challenged the state over the issue .
Signature matching is considered a key check in many states that run elections through the mail , and election officials are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to question signatures that don ’ t appear to match .
But though Pennsylvania asks voters to sign a declaration on mail ballots , the state ’ s new laws over the past two years expanding vote-by-mail options don ’ t require those signatures to match , the state court says .
In Oregon , which pioneered vote-by-mail and where every voter is automatically mailed a ballot , thousands of votes are disqualified in each election because signatures didn ’ t match .
The state does give voters a chance to “ cure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ count , though not all voters are able to be reached , and some don ’ t bother to fix the situation , particularly if Election Day has already passed .
In Pennsylvania , voters who cast ballots by mail are supposed to sign a declaration on the envelope used to mail back their ballot .

Unbelievable corruption from the Left. Changing the rules of an election with just over a week is beyond disgraceful. But this is the world that we live in because of the corrupt Dems, who know they can’t defeat President Trump fairly. G-d help us if the Democrats take power on November 3rd. Watch your back, Mr. President. Vote in person, America.
Pennsylvania democrats are methodically changing the rules so they can steal the election. It is amazingly open, dishonest, ruthless and will work unless the state ( especially Philadelphia) is flooded with law enforcement.
Pa. Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots will count even if signatures don’t match
By Washington Times, October 23, 2020
Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court ruled Friday that election officials must accept mail-in ballots even if the signatures on them don’t match those on file for a voter.
The justices said nothing in the state’s laws required signatures to be verified, so if election officials are satisfied with the vote save for the signature, they cannot reject it.
“We, therefore, grant the Secretary’s petition for declarative relief, and direct the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting, computing, and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third- party challenges based on such comparisons,” Justice Debra Todd wrote in the opinion for a unanimous court.
President Trump’s campaign had challenged the state over the issue.
Signature matching is considered a key check in many states that run elections through the mail, and election officials are trained in how to spot matches and to question signatures that don’t appear to match.
But though Pennsylvania asks voters to sign a declaration on mail ballots, the state’s new laws over the past two years expanding vote-by-mail options don’t require those signatures to match, the state court says.
In Oregon, which pioneered vote-by-mail and where every voter is automatically mailed a ballot, thousands of votes are disqualified in each election because signatures didn’t match.
The state does give voters a chance to “cure” the error and have their vote count, though not all voters are able to be reached, and some don’t bother to fix the situation, particularly if Election Day has already passed.
In Pennsylvania, voters who cast ballots by mail are supposed to sign a declaration on the envelope used to mail back their ballot.


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--Bloody Jihad in Mozambique Spreads To Tanzania, 300 Muslim Attackers Slaughter Dozens

It has been three years since the beginning of the Islamic insurgency in the northern province of Cabo Delgado in Mozambique .
The conflict is said to have claimed more than 2,000 lives ; more than 300,000 internal refugees have been recorded and a significant number of properties have been destroyed by jihadis .
And it ’ s spreading — Tanzania just confirmed it ’ s first Islamic attack .
Islamist militants carried out a deadly attack on a village last week near the Tanzanian port of Mtwara , a major oil and gas logistics base in the south of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from gas-rich Cabo Delgado in neighbouring Mozambique .
The news was confirmed by Tanzanian officials and signals a worrying escalation and expansion of an Islamist insurgency that began three years ago in Mozambique and threatens some $ 50 billion-worth of liquefied natural gas investments at Afungi in Cabo Delgado .
Twenty civilians and three Tanzanian security forces reportedly died after Kitaya was attacked by a reported 300 militants .
Local reports said gunmen launched the assault on Kitaya before retreating back across the Rovuma river that forms the border between Tanzania and Mozambique @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told reporters that both Tanzanians and foreigners were arrested “ in connection with the terrorist incident ” .
He said Tanzania is working with regional neighbours to “ flush out the terrorists ” .
Mozambique : The War in Mozambique ’ s Cabo Delgado – Four Scenarios That Will Potentially Materialise With the conflict in northern Mozambique showing no signs of stopping , the question is , where is Cabo Delgado province heading ?
Based on the multiple reasons behind the conflict , and considering the increasing international political and economic interests in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ managed in post-independence Mozambique , four scenarios are conceivable .
It has been three years since the beginning of the Islamic insurgency in the northern province of Cabo Delgado in Mozambique .
So far , the conflict is said to have claimed more than 2,000 lives ; more than 300,000 internal refugees have been recorded and a significant number of properties have been destroyed by Ansar al-Sunna ( AaS ) , an allegedly Islamic State affiliate fighting Mozambique ’ s military forces to establish a local Islamic state .
AaS ’ s violent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Delgado started in October 2017 , targeting local police stations and villages .
By May 2018 the attacks had reached horrendous proportions .
Before turning violent , AaS members had begun to preach a radical form of Islam and to build their own mosques .
Later , the group started opposing Western-style institutions , such as the rule of law , sending children to regular schools , individual liberties , the power of state representatives , and mutual tolerance… DODODOMA , Tanzania ( AP ) — For the first time , Tanzania ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country by Islamic extremists based in neighboring Mozambique .
The attack claimed by an affiliate of the Islamic State group last week marks an ominous expansion of the shadowy group that has killed more than 1,500 people in northern Mozambique since it emerged in 2017 .
Tanzania ’ s inspector general of police , Simon Sirro , told local media on Thursday that some 300 attackers were involved in the assault on Kitaya , a riverside border village in the Mtwara region .
He said some were arrested .
He did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The growing extremist violence in northern Mozambique has displaced more than 300,000 people , creating an urgent humanitarian crisis , the U.N. World Food Program said last month .
The extremists have dramatically stepped up attacks this year , capturing the strategic port city of Mocimboa da Praia in August .
Mozambique ’ s northern Cabo Delgado province has massive deposits of liquified natural gas , and the violence threatens to disrupt the billions of dollars of international investment .
The extremists risk giving Mozambique “ the type of threat that Boko Haram @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Tibor Nagy told journalists earlier this year…… .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

It has been three years since the beginning of the Islamic insurgency in the northern province of Cabo Delgado in Mozambique. The conflict is said to have claimed more than 2,000 lives; more than 300,000 internal refugees have been recorded and a significant number of properties have been destroyed by jihadis. And it’s spreading — Tanzania just confirmed it’s first Islamic attack.
Upstream The Global Oil and Gas News Source: Islamist militants carried out a deadly attack on a village last week near the Tanzanian port of Mtwara, a major oil and gas logistics base in the south of the country, after crossing the border from gas-rich Cabo Delgado in neighbouring Mozambique. The news was confirmed by Tanzanian officials and signals a worrying escalation and expansion of an Islamist insurgency that began three years ago in Mozambique and threatens some $50 billion-worth of liquefied natural gas investments at Afungi in Cabo Delgado. Twenty civilians and three Tanzanian security forces reportedly died after Kitaya was attacked by a reported 300 militants. Local reports said gunmen launched the assault on Kitaya before retreating back across the Rovuma river that forms the border between Tanzania and Mozambique. Inspector General of Police Simon Sirro told reporters that both Tanzanians and foreigners were arrested “in connection with the terrorist incident”. He said Tanzania is working with regional neighbours to “flush out the terrorists”.
Jihad. These are Islamic attacks. You can say it – we don’t live under sharia. https://t.co/FnugvOUcTz — Geller Report (@PamelaGeller) October 23, 2020
Mozambique: The War in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado – Four Scenarios That Will Potentially Materialise With the conflict in northern Mozambique showing no signs of stopping, the question is, where is Cabo Delgado province heading? Based on the multiple reasons behind the conflict, and considering the increasing international political and economic interests in Cabo Delgado and how conflicts have been managed in post-independence Mozambique, four scenarios are conceivable. By: Fredson Guilengue and Andreas Bohne,All Africa, October 22, 2020: It has been three years since the beginning of the Islamic insurgency in the northern province of Cabo Delgado in Mozambique. So far, the conflict is said to have claimed more than 2,000 lives; more than 300,000 internal refugees have been recorded and a significant number of properties have been destroyed by Ansar al-Sunna (AaS), an allegedly Islamic State affiliate fighting Mozambique’s military forces to establish a local Islamic state. AaS’s violent activities in the gas-rich province of Cabo Delgado started in October 2017, targeting local police stations and villages. By May 2018 the attacks had reached horrendous proportions. Before turning violent, AaS members had begun to preach a radical form of Islam and to build their own mosques. Later, the group started opposing Western-style institutions, such as the rule of law, sending children to regular schools, individual liberties, the power of state representatives, and mutual tolerance…
Read the rest.
Tanzania confirms 1st attack by Mozambique-based extremists AP, Oct. 23, 2020: DODODOMA, Tanzania (AP) — For the first time, Tanzania’s government has acknowledged an attack inside the country by Islamic extremists based in neighboring Mozambique. The attack claimed by an affiliate of the Islamic State group last week marks an ominous expansion of the shadowy group that has killed more than 1,500 people in northern Mozambique since it emerged in 2017. Tanzania’s inspector general of police, Simon Sirro, told local media on Thursday that some 300 attackers were involved in the assault on Kitaya, a riverside border village in the Mtwara region. He said some were arrested. He did not say how many people were killed. The growing extremist violence in northern Mozambique has displaced more than 300,000 people, creating an urgent humanitarian crisis, the U.N. World Food Program said last month. The extremists have dramatically stepped up attacks this year, capturing the strategic port city of Mocimboa da Praia in August. Mozambique’s northern Cabo Delgado province has massive deposits of liquified natural gas, and the violence threatens to disrupt the billions of dollars of international investment. The extremists risk giving Mozambique “the type of threat that Boko Haram has become in Nigeria,” U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Tibor Nagy told journalists earlier this year…….
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-24--President Trump to hold rally in Circleville, Ohio Saturday

One of three huge Trump rallies this Saturday .
The other two being in North Carolina and Wisconsin .
What a machine our POTUS is .
Trump is energizing the American people with these rallies , while that corrupt and demented Joe Biden goes into isolation in Delaware .
That alone should disqualify Biden from receiving your vote .
Expect a major ass kicking of the Left on November 3rd by Team Trump .
Trump ’ s campaign website said he will be joined by County Commissioner Brian Stewart and Ohio Supreme Court Justices Sharon Kennedy and Judi French .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ tickets here .
Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have made several recent stops in the Buckeye State as Election Day draws near .
In late September , Trump spoke at events in Vandalia and Swanton .
Pence was in Cincinnati Wednesday and has also visited Columbus , Zanesville , and Lordstown .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

One of three huge Trump rallies this Saturday. The other two being in North Carolina and Wisconsin. What a machine our POTUS is. Trump is energizing the American people with these rallies, while that corrupt and demented Joe Biden goes into isolation in Delaware. That alone should disqualify Biden from receiving your vote. Expect a major ass kicking of the Left on November 3rd by Team Trump.
I am not just running against Biden, I am running against the Corrupt Media, the Big Tech Giants, and the Washington Swamp. It is time to send a message to these wealthy liberal hypocrites by delivering Joe Biden a THUNDERING defeat on November 3rd! #MAGA https://t.co/gsFSgh2KPc pic.twitter.com/eRRgjnhyIi — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 22, 2020
President Trump to hold rally in Circleville Saturday By ABC6, October 22, 2020 President Donald Trump will be holding a Make America Great Again Victory Rally in Circleville on Saturday afternoon. The rally will be held at the Pickaway Agriculture and Event Center at 4 p.m. Saturday.
#NEW: President @realDonaldTrump to rally in Circleville on Saturday. This will be his first recent Ohio visit that is not at an airport tarmac.@VP @Mike_Pence rallied at the fairgrounds in Zanesville last month. pic.twitter.com/pdIaTGXfnK — Geoff Redick (@GeoffWSYX6) October 22, 2020
Trump’s campaign website said he will be joined by County Commissioner Brian Stewart and Ohio Supreme Court Justices Sharon Kennedy and Judi French. Those wanting to attend can Trump and Vice President Mike Pence have made several recent stops in the Buckeye State as Election Day draws near. In late September, Trump spoke at events in Vandalia and Swanton. Pence was in and has also visited , , and
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-10-25--San Francisco Tech CEO Emails 10 Million Customers Urging Them To Vote For Biden

Media , news outlets , Hollywood , academia , cable — all aligned against freedom and individual rights .
San Francisco Tech CEO Emails 10 Million Customers Urging Them To Vote For Biden Offering yet another reminder of just how far-removed the hysterical hyper-liberalism of San Francisco and the Bay Area is from the normal American political baseline , the CEO of Expensify , one of the world ’ s largest providers of expense account software , recently emailed all 10 million users of the firms ’ software pleading with them to vote for Vice President Joe Biden .
According @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strong debate ” within the company , which is based in San Francisco , with some employees disagreeing with the gesture .
But CEO David Barrett , the driving force behind the message , said he decided to press ahead and hit ‘ send ’ .
At one point in the email , Barrett wrote that “ anything less than a vote for Biden is a vote against democracy , ” and that if President Trump were reelected , Barrett wrote , it would “ damage our democracy to such an extent , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shareholders to take any action I can to avoid it.
” Barrett tried to justify the email by telling Bloomberg that a Trump victory could stoke civil unrest , which would in turn be “ bad for business , ” because “ not many expense reports get filed during a civil war.
” Political activism in the workplace has become a major issue in Silicon Valley , particularly since the CEO of Coinbase offered employees a buyout if they disagreed with a new companywide rule discouraging any kind of heated political debate or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was inspired to speak up by Armstrong ’ s “ cowardly ” decision .
“ All evil needs is for good people to stand aside , ” Barrett said .
“ Not standing for anything means you ’ re standing for the status quo.
” Earlier this year , Expensify blacked out out its homepage in a show of support for BLM .
Many customers backed the gesture , Barrett said , though others did threaten to take their business elsewhere .
“ Some people do leave , ” he said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the latest display of Bay Area paternalism might have not have been aggravating enough to send customers elsewhere , we suspect more than a few Expensify users got a good chuckle out of Barrett ’ s insistence that voting for anybody but his preferred candidate would contribute to the death of Democracy .

Media, news outlets, Hollywood, academia, cable — all aligned against freedom and individual rights.
Trump’s presidency is proof of G-d. Divine intervention.
San Francisco Tech CEO Emails 10 Million Customers Urging Them To Vote For Biden
By Tyler Burden, Zero Hedge, October 24, 2020:
Offering yet another reminder of just how far-removed the hysterical hyper-liberalism of San Francisco and the Bay Area is from the normal American political baseline, the CEO of Expensify, one of the world’s largest providers of expense account software, recently emailed all 10 million users of the firms’ software pleading with them to vote for Vice President Joe Biden.
According to Bloomberg, the idea elicited “strong debate” within the company, which is based in San Francisco, with some employees disagreeing with the gesture. But CEO David Barrett, the driving force behind the message, said he decided to press ahead and hit ‘send’.
At one point in the email, Barrett wrote that “anything less than a vote for Biden is a vote against democracy,” and that if President Trump were reelected, Barrett wrote, it would “damage our democracy to such an extent, I’m obligated on behalf of shareholders to take any action I can to avoid it.”
Read the complete email below:
Wow. Just received an extraordinary email from @expensify CEO @dbarrett. I can't remember ever seeing anything even remotely close to it. pic.twitter.com/lPCBMjQSh4 — Rick Klau (@rklau) October 22, 2020
I admire @dbarrett's courage to state unequivocally what he believes in, even in spite of the inevitably polarizing effect such an email is likely to have. — Rick Klau (@rklau) October 22, 2020
And yes, I happen to agree with him. But if I was doing business with someone who felt this strongly in the favor of a candidate / position in opposition to me, I'd actually really like to know that too. — Rick Klau (@rklau) October 22, 2020
A little more color from @dbarrett on how the company approached this communication. Really impressed.https://t.co/DbuQgxr445 — Rick Klau (@rklau) October 23, 2020
This interview @dbarrett did with @protocol reveals the process the company followed to engage all employees in the discussion ahead of making a statement. It's a fascinating look into a company leaning into the moment. Thoroughly impressed.https://t.co/8XstZGY4Dg — Rick Klau (@rklau) October 23, 2020
Barrett tried to justify the email by telling Bloomberg that a Trump victory could stoke civil unrest, which would in turn be “bad for business,” because “not many expense reports get filed during a civil war.”
Political activism in the workplace has become a major issue in Silicon Valley, particularly since the CEO of Coinbase offered employees a buyout if they disagreed with a new companywide rule discouraging any kind of heated political debate or activity within the office. Barrett said he was inspired to speak up by Armstrong’s “cowardly” decision.
“All evil needs is for good people to stand aside,” Barrett said. “Not standing for anything means you’re standing for the status quo.”
Earlier this year, Expensify blacked out out its homepage in a show of support for BLM. Many customers backed the gesture, Barrett said, though others did threaten to take their business elsewhere. “Some people do leave,” he said. “Most don’t.”
While the latest display of Bay Area paternalism might have not have been aggravating enough to send customers elsewhere, we suspect more than a few Expensify users got a good chuckle out of Barrett’s insistence that voting for anybody but his preferred candidate would contribute to the death of Democracy.