pamelagellerreport--2020-03-05--Elizabeth Warren Drops Out Of Presidential Race

Back to her teepee in her home state – which didn ’ t even vote for her .
Elizabeth Warren , Once a Front-Runner , Will Drop Out of Presidential Race Ms. Warren , a senator and former law professor , staked her campaign on fighting corruption and changing the rules of the economy .
Though her support had eroded by Super Tuesday , in her final weeks as a candidate she effectively drove the centrist billionaire , former New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg , out of the race with debate performances that flashed her evident skills and political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the corrosive power of big money , and one long-term consequence of her campaign is that Ms. Warren demonstrated that someone other than Senator Bernie Sanders , and his intensely loyal small-dollar donors , could fund a credible presidential campaign without holding fund-raisers .
Her potential endorsement is highly sought after in the race and both Mr. Sanders and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. have spoken with Ms. Warren since Super Tuesday , when the end of her campaign appeared imminent .
Ms. Warren ’ s political demise was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a dramatic implosion but a steady decline .
Last October , according to most national polls , Ms. Warren was the national pacesetter in the Democratic field .
By December , she had fallen to the edge of the top tier , wounded by a presidential debate in November where her opponents relentlessly attacked her .
She invested heavily in the early states , with a ground game that was the envy of her rivals .
But it did not pay off : In the first four early voting states , Ms. Warren @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fourth in New Hampshire and Nevada to fifth in South Carolina .
By Super Tuesday , her campaign was effectively over — with the final blow of a third-place finish in the primary of her home state , Massachusetts .
The news clarifies that a Democratic field that began with a record number of female candidates has now become a contest between Mr. Biden , 77 , and Mr. Sanders , 78 .
Ms. Warren ’ s exit also clears the party ’ s left lane for Mr. Sanders , who had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ polls had predicted .
The Sanders campaign will now aim to attract enough of Ms. Warren ’ s ideologically progressive supporters to put him over the top in a closely contested primary .
Ms. Warren arrived on the political scene in the aftermath of the 2008 financial collapse and shot to superstardom with her indictments of Wall Street and unfettered capitalism.In 2016 , some progressive organizations mounted “ Run Warren Run ” campaigns and her eventual presidential rival , Mr. Sanders , floated her name as a possible challenger to Hillary Clinton , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ run then .
Four years later , when Ms. Warren did decide to pursue the Democratic nomination , she entered a changed political terrain — a challenging landscape whose obstacles she was never able to overcome .
Mr. Sanders ’ s political stock had soared after he ran against Mrs. Clinton in 2016 , giving him an immediate advantage in fund-raising and name recognition that complicated Ms. Warren ’ s electoral path .
And Donald J. Trump was not just a reality TV star and one of many potential Republican rivals in 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his election seemed to shock the Democratic base into an electability-induced stupor .
Voters constantly second-guessed their electoral choices as they tried to game out which candidate would be best equipped to beat him .
Mr. Biden , in particular , has capitalized on this anxiety to drive voters to his candidacy .
Ms. Warren ’ s allies and supporters said the question of electability — who would be the surest bet to defeat the president — disproportionately hurt all the women who ran for president this cycle .
Voters , they argue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that a woman would have a more difficult time defeating Mr. Trump , informed by Mrs. Clinton ’ s unexpected loss in 2016 .
At recent events , Ms. Warren had taken to speaking to voters directly about their electability fears , imploring them to tune out pundits who were writing her off and vote their own conscience .
“ Here ’ s my advice : Cast a vote that will make you proud , ” Ms. Warren told voters on Super Tuesday , speaking in Detroit .
“ Cast a vote from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you think will make the best president of the United States.
” Though her allies stress structural barriers , Ms. Warren ’ s shortcomings as a candidate had a great deal to do with her operation .
At times , Ms. Warren ’ s campaign did not reflect the urgency of a candidacy trying to make history , not only as the first female president , but also through a program of systemic upheaval that would include government-run health care , free public college , student debt cancellation , breaking up big tech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ significant tax increases on the wealthiest individuals and corporations .
During debates ahead of the votes in Iowa and New Hampshire , two states where Ms. Warren had invested many of her presidential hopes , she took a back seat to other candidates like Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar .
Her campaign chose not to invest heavily in television advertising , and was dominated on the airwaves in early voting states like Iowa and New Hampshire .
Its bet on organizing staff failed to change the picture .
She had also embraced a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidate , ” dropping the policy-focused message that had seemed to resonate with voters early on and pitching herself as the electoral compromise between the left-wing dominated by Mr. Sanders and the moderate wing led by former Mr. Biden .

Back to her teepee in her home state – which didn’t even vote for her.
Elizabeth Warren, Once a Front-Runner, Will Drop Out of Presidential Race
Ms. Warren, a senator and former law professor, staked her campaign on fighting corruption and changing the rules of the economy.
By Astead W. Herndon and Shane Goldmacher, NY Times, March 5, 2020:
Though her support had eroded by Super Tuesday, in her final weeks as a candidate she effectively drove the centrist billionaire, former New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, out of the race with debate performances that flashed her evident skills and political potential.
She entered the race railing against the corrosive power of big money, and one long-term consequence of her campaign is that Ms. Warren demonstrated that someone other than Senator Bernie Sanders, and his intensely loyal small-dollar donors, could fund a credible presidential campaign without holding fund-raisers.
Her potential endorsement is highly sought after in the race and both Mr. Sanders and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. have spoken with Ms. Warren since Super Tuesday, when the end of her campaign appeared imminent.
Ms. Warren’s political demise was a death by a thousand cuts, not a dramatic implosion but a steady decline. Last October, according to most national polls, Ms. Warren was the national pacesetter in the Democratic field. By December, she had fallen to the edge of the top tier, wounded by a presidential debate in November where her opponents relentlessly attacked her.
She invested heavily in the early states, with a ground game that was the envy of her rivals. But it did not pay off: In the first four early voting states, Ms. Warren slid from third place in Iowa to fourth in New Hampshire and Nevada to fifth in South Carolina. By Super Tuesday, her campaign was effectively over — with the final blow of a third-place finish in the primary of her home state, Massachusetts.
The news clarifies that a Democratic field that began with a record number of female candidates has now become a contest between Mr. Biden, 77, and Mr. Sanders, 78.
Ms. Warren’s exit also clears the party’s left lane for Mr. Sanders, who had a more muted showing on Super Tuesday than polls had predicted. The Sanders campaign will now aim to attract enough of Ms. Warren’s ideologically progressive supporters to put him over the top in a closely contested primary.
Ms. Warren arrived on the political scene in the aftermath of the 2008 financial collapse and shot to superstardom with her indictments of Wall Street and unfettered capitalism.In 2016, some progressive organizations mounted “Run Warren Run” campaigns and her eventual presidential rival, Mr. Sanders, floated her name as a possible challenger to Hillary Clinton, but Ms. Warren resisted the urge to run then.
Four years later, when Ms. Warren did decide to pursue the Democratic nomination, she entered a changed political terrain — a challenging landscape whose obstacles she was never able to overcome. Mr. Sanders’s political stock had soared after he ran against Mrs. Clinton in 2016, giving him an immediate advantage in fund-raising and name recognition that complicated Ms. Warren’s electoral path. And Donald J. Trump was not just a reality TV star and one of many potential Republican rivals in 2020. He was the president, and his election seemed to shock the Democratic base into an electability-induced stupor. Voters constantly second-guessed their electoral choices as they tried to game out which candidate would be best equipped to beat him. Mr. Biden, in particular, has capitalized on this anxiety to drive voters to his candidacy. Ms. Warren’s allies and supporters said the question of electability — who would be the surest bet to defeat the president — disproportionately hurt all the women who ran for president this cycle. Voters, they argue, were swayed by a media narrative that a woman would have a more difficult time defeating Mr. Trump, informed by Mrs. Clinton’s unexpected loss in 2016. At recent events, Ms. Warren had taken to speaking to voters directly about their electability fears, imploring them to tune out pundits who were writing her off and vote their own conscience. “Here’s my advice: Cast a vote that will make you proud,” Ms. Warren told voters on Super Tuesday, speaking in Detroit. “Cast a vote from your heart. Vote for the person you think will make the best president of the United States.” Though her allies stress structural barriers, Ms. Warren’s shortcomings as a candidate had a great deal to do with her operation. At times, Ms. Warren’s campaign did not reflect the urgency of a candidacy trying to make history, not only as the first female president, but also through a program of systemic upheaval that would include government-run health care, free public college, student debt cancellation, breaking up big tech companies, universal child care, and significant tax increases on the wealthiest individuals and corporations.


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-05--Bill Maher: ‘Bright side’ of coronavirus controversy is it might make people dislike Trump

Bill Maher : ‘ Bright side ’ of coronavirus controversy is it might make people dislike Trump HBO host Bill Maher denied rooting for failure in the administration ’ s response to the coronavirus , but said President Trump ’ s alleged incompetence would “ finally ” turn people against him .
“ I ’ m going to look on the bright side of this and say that I think the coronavirus is going to change people ’ s views of Donald Trump , finally ” he said on Friday ’ s “ Real Time.
” “ Not for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s comments came after a rally in which the president dismissed as a “ hoax ” Democratic concerns about his handling of the virus .
However , Maher stated that Trump called the virus itself a Democratic hoax .
“ We ’ re not rooting for failure !
We ’ re rooting for health !
We ’ re rooting for competence !
” Trump ’ s campaign fired back on Friday against claims like Maher ’ s , saying that Trump wasn ’ t referring to the virus itself .
“ Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Trump told a crowd on Thursday night .
“ Coronavirus , they ’ re politicizing it .
We did one of the great jobs .
You see , ‘ How ’ s president Trump doing ?
’ They go , ‘ oh not good , not good.
’ They have no clue .
They can ’ t even count their votes in Iowa — not they can ’ t , they can ’ t count their votes.
” He added that one of his associates suggested the Democrats were perpetrating a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia investigation .
“ One of my people came up to me and said , ‘ Mr .
President , they tried to beat you on Russia , Russia , Russia , that didn ’ t work out too well .
They couldn ’ t do it .
They tried the impeachment hoax , ’ that was on a perfect conversation , ‘ they tried anything , they tried it over and over and they ’ ve been doing it since you got in .
It ’ s all turning , they lost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think of it , think of it , and this is their new hoax . '
” The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , too .
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Pure evil, but that’s the Left.
.@BillMaher says there’s a bright side to the coronavirus. Maher, who has a show on @HBO, said, "I'm going to look on the bright side of this & say that I think the coronavirus is going to change people's views of Donald Trump, finally.” That’s sick. 1/3 https://t.co/uEQNLkyIs2 — Franklin Graham (@Franklin_Graham) March 2, 2020
Bill Maher: ‘Bright side’ of coronavirus controversy is it might make people dislike Trump By Fox News, March 1, 2020: HBO host Bill Maher denied rooting for failure in the administration’s response to the coronavirus, but said President Trump’s alleged incompetence would “finally” turn people against him. “I’m going to look on the bright side of this and say that I think the coronavirus is going to change people’s views of Donald Trump, finally” he said on Friday’s “Real Time.” “Not for the better,” he added. Maher’s comments came after a rally in which the president dismissed as a “hoax” Democratic concerns about his handling of the virus. However, Maher stated that Trump called the virus itself a Democratic hoax. Maher also denied wanting President Trump to fail. “We’re not rooting for failure! We’re rooting for health! We’re rooting for competence!” Trump’s campaign fired back on Friday against claims like Maher’s, saying that Trump wasn’t referring to the virus itself.
Here’s the video.@realDonaldTrump clearly says the Democrats’ politicization of & attempts to weaponize the coronavirus is “the new hoax.” He does not call the virus itself a hoax. And all media and pundits saying otherwise are proving POTUS’s point.
pic.twitter.com/5kPSJtn3ly — Tim Murtaugh – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TimMurtaugh) February 29, 2020
“Now, the Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus,” Trump told a crowd on Thursday night. “Coronavirus, they’re politicizing it. We did one of the great jobs. You see, ‘How’s president Trump doing?’ They go, ‘oh not good, not good.’ They have no clue. They can’t even count their votes in Iowa — not they can’t, they can’t count their votes.” He added that one of his associates suggested the Democrats were perpetrating a hoax like they purportedly did during the Russia investigation. “One of my people came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia, that didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax,’ that was on a perfect conversation, ‘they tried anything, they tried it over and over and they’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning — think of it, think of it, and this is their new hoax.'”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-05--US Supreme Court refuses to review terrorism convictions of Muslim who plotted to behead Pamela Gell

US Supreme Court refuses to review terrorism convictions of Muslim who plotted to behead Pamela Geller

The Supreme Court was unequivocal .
And that ’ s striking .
Because today you don ’ t know how these things will go .
And his defense team pulled out every card .
They played the race card and everything else they could play .
But in this instance , justice prevailed .
Not only did Daoud Wright target me for a brutal , cruel and violent death , but there has been no indication that he has given up these beliefs , and they are only being reinforced while he is in prison , due to a prison @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that prison officials are unable or unwilling to do anything about .
There is no indication that once he is released from prison at any time in the future , that he would not resume his quest to kill me .
He should have been given , as I requested , the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole .
The US Supreme Court won ’ t hear David Daoud Wright ’ s challenge to the terrorism-related convictions stemming from his leadership of two men who plotted to kill Boston @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pamela Geller , whom terror group ISIS had targeted for death .
The justices did not issue a written explanation for their refusal and instead the clerk of the nation ’ s highest court sent a terse letter to Wright ’ s attorneys and the lower federal courts in Boston .
The appeal request is called a writ of certiorari .
“ The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case : The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied , ” the letter from the US Supreme Court reads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of Everett , was convicted of leading the small group that included his uncle , Usaamah Rahim , 26 , who was shot and killed when he confronted Boston police officers and FBI special agents with a knife in Roslindale in June 2015 .
Rahim , authorities said , was planning to board a bus and randomly attack victims .
Wright took the stand in his own defense during his trial in US District Court in Boston and said he was only engaging in an “ ISIS role-play fantasy ” because he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He was convicted on five charges , and sentenced to 28 years behind bars .
Four of his five convictions were later upheld by the First Circuit Court of Appeals… .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

The Supreme Court was unequivocal. And that’s striking. Because today you don’t know how these things will go. And his defense team pulled out every card. They played the race card and everything else they could play. But in this instance, justice prevailed. Not only did Daoud Wright target me for a brutal, cruel and violent death, but there has been no indication that he has given up these beliefs, and they are only being reinforced while he is in prison, due to a prison system that is rife with jihad recruitment that prison officials are unable or unwilling to do anything about. There is no indication that once he is released from prison at any time in the future, that he would not resume his quest to kill me. He should have been given, as I requested, the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.
“US Supreme Court refuses to review Everett man’s terrorism-related convictions,” by John R. Ellement, Boston Globe, March 4, 2020:
The US Supreme Court won’t hear David Daoud Wright’s challenge to the terrorism-related convictions stemming from his leadership of two men who plotted to kill Boston police officers in 2015 and political commentator Pamela Geller, whom terror group ISIS had targeted for death. The justices did not issue a written explanation for their refusal and instead the clerk of the nation’s highest court sent a terse letter to Wright’s attorneys and the lower federal courts in Boston. The appeal request is called a writ of certiorari. “The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied,” the letter from the US Supreme Court reads. It is dated Monday. Wright, of Everett, was convicted of leading the small group that included his uncle, Usaamah Rahim, 26, who was shot and killed when he confronted Boston police officers and FBI special agents with a knife in Roslindale in June 2015. Rahim, authorities said, was planning to board a bus and randomly attack victims. Wright took the stand in his own defense during his trial in US District Court in Boston and said he was only engaging in an “ISIS role-play fantasy” because he was obese and had no social life. He was convicted on five charges, and sentenced to 28 years behind bars. Four of his five convictions were later upheld by the First Circuit Court of Appeals….
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-05--Iran Caught Hiding Nuclear Work – Tripling Its Nuclear Stockpile, Sparking Call for Full Sanctions ‘

Iran Caught Hiding Nuclear Work – Tripling Its Nuclear Stockpile, Sparking Call for Full Sanctions ‘Snapback’

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency ( IAEA ) , Iran has nearly tripled its stockpile of enriched uranium since November , despite the agreement it had made in the disastrous nuclear deal from which President Trump had withdrawn , but countries that remained signatories still believe in .
The International Atomic Energy Agency stated that as of Feb. 19 , Iran ’ s total stockpile of low-enriched uranium reached 1,020.9 kilograms compared to 372.3 kilograms as noted in its last report on Nov. 3 , 2019 , ABC News reported , adding , “ The current stockpile puts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to produce a nuclear weapon , which it insists it does not want to do.
” Germany , France , Britain , China and Russia are still signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal , aka the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ( JCPOA ) , which permits Iran to amass no more than 202.8 kilograms .
Relatd : Former top Obama official accused of blaming Jews for Iranian nuclear stockpile SFRC chair says Trump must ‘ trigger a full snapback of sanctions ’ Iran ’ s stockpiling of highly enriched uranium is raising @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undisclosed nuclear work and the efficacy of soon-to-be-lifted restrictions on its missile program , which develops the primary vehicle to carry a nuclear payload , U.S. officials told the Washington Free Beacon .
Iran has been blocking inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency ( IAEA ) from accessing key sites that the watchdog group has cited for having traces of undisclosed nuclear materials , fueling speculation that Tehran is again engaged in the secret construction of nuclear weapons-grade material .
Recently installed IAEA chief Rafael Grossi took the unprecedented step this week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intransigence , telling Reuters on Tuesday the Islamic Republic is not living up to multiple commitments under the landmark nuclear accord .
“ We have insisted and despite all our efforts we have not been able to get that [ access ] , so the situation requires on my part such a step because what this means is that Iran is curtailing the ability of the agency to do its work , ” Grossi said .
While the Trump administration removed the United States from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United Nations Security Council for a “ snapback ” of all international sanctions lifted under the accord , which still counts several European countries as members .
The administration ’ s long-awaited decision on snapback has emerged as a flashpoint ahead of the lifting of a U.N. embargo on Iran ’ s missile program in October .
If the U.N. ban is lifted on Iran ’ s missile program , which includes medium and long-range ballistic missiles capable of carrying a nuclear payload , Iran will be free to purchase a range @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its power grab across the Middle East , U.S. officials warn .
Already , Russia has signaled that it will stand in the way of Trump administration efforts to maintain the arms embargo , setting the stage for a showdown at the U.N. over the embargo and sanctions snapback .
State Department officials told the Free Beacon that Russia is taking a significant risk with its position , which could spark a massive arms race across the Middle East and throw the region into further chaos .
“ Failure to extend the U.N. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ buy and sell advanced weapons will lead to an escalating arms race in the Middle East , ” a State Department official , speaking only on background about the situation , told the Free Beacon on Wednesday .
“ That should worry every nation , including Russia.
” If Russia and other traditional foes such as China buck the United States on the arms embargo , the Trump administration may be forced to invoke snapback , a failsafe mechanism built into the nuclear accord that permits nations involved to unilaterally reapply all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the deal .
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the Free Beacon late last month that he and the president are undecided on the issue of snapback .
However , if the arms embargo is set to be lifted , the Trump administration may be forced to invoke snapback as a last-ditch effort to keep sanctions on Iran in place .
Sen. Jim Risch ( R. , Idaho ) , chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee , told the Free Beacon that the Trump administration should not hesitate to initiate sanctions snapback @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here .
Make a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – choose the option that suits you best .

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran has nearly tripled its stockpile of enriched uranium since November, despite the agreement it had made in the disastrous nuclear deal from which President Trump had withdrawn, but countries that remained signatories still believe in.
The International Atomic Energy Agency stated that as of Feb. 19, Iran’s total stockpile of low-enriched uranium reached 1,020.9 kilograms compared to 372.3 kilograms as noted in its last report on Nov. 3, 2019, ABC News reported, adding, “The current stockpile puts Iran within reach of the amount needed to produce a nuclear weapon, which it insists it does not want to do.”
Germany, France, Britain, China and Russia are still signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal, aka the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which permits Iran to amass no more than 202.8 kilograms.
Relatd: Former top Obama official accused of blaming Jews for Iranian nuclear stockpile
Iran Caught Hiding Nuclear Work, Sparking Call for Full Sanctions ‘Snapback’ SFRC chair says Trump must ‘trigger a full snapback of sanctions’ By: Adam Kredo, WFB, March 4, 2020: Iran’s stockpiling of highly enriched uranium is raising new questions about the scope of its undisclosed nuclear work and the efficacy of soon-to-be-lifted restrictions on its missile program, which develops the primary vehicle to carry a nuclear payload, U.S. officials told the Washington Free Beacon. Iran has been blocking inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from accessing key sites that the watchdog group has cited for having traces of undisclosed nuclear materials, fueling speculation that Tehran is again engaged in the secret construction of nuclear weapons-grade material. Recently installed IAEA chief Rafael Grossi took the unprecedented step this week of going public about Iran’s intransigence, telling Reuters on Tuesday the Islamic Republic is not living up to multiple commitments under the landmark nuclear accord. “We have insisted and despite all our efforts we have not been able to get that [access], so the situation requires on my part such a step because what this means is that Iran is curtailing the ability of the agency to do its work,” Grossi said. While the Trump administration removed the United States from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018, administration officials maintain they can still petition the United Nations Security Council for a “snapback” of all international sanctions lifted under the accord, which still counts several European countries as members. The administration’s long-awaited decision on snapback has emerged as a flashpoint ahead of the lifting of a U.N. embargo on Iran’s missile program in October. If the U.N. ban is lifted on Iran’s missile program, which includes medium and long-range ballistic missiles capable of carrying a nuclear payload, Iran will be free to purchase a range of offensive weapons that will further embolden its power grab across the Middle East, U.S. officials warn. Already, Russia has signaled that it will stand in the way of Trump administration efforts to maintain the arms embargo, setting the stage for a showdown at the U.N. over the embargo and sanctions snapback. State Department officials told the Free Beacon that Russia is taking a significant risk with its position, which could spark a massive arms race across the Middle East and throw the region into further chaos. “Failure to extend the U.N. ban on Iran’s ability to buy and sell advanced weapons will lead to an escalating arms race in the Middle East,” a State Department official, speaking only on background about the situation, told the Free Beacon on Wednesday. “That should worry every nation, including Russia.” If Russia and other traditional foes such as China buck the United States on the arms embargo, the Trump administration may be forced to invoke snapback, a failsafe mechanism built into the nuclear accord that permits nations involved to unilaterally reapply all of the international sanctions lifted as part of the deal. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the Free Beacon late last month that he and the president are undecided on the issue of snapback. However, if the arms embargo is set to be lifted, the Trump administration may be forced to invoke snapback as a last-ditch effort to keep sanctions on Iran in place. Sen. Jim Risch (R., Idaho), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told the Free Beacon that the Trump administration should not hesitate to initiate sanctions snapback at the U.N.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--Facebook Censors Trump Campaign Ads

Facebook Censors Trump Campaign Ads

Ironically , one of the ads that made Democrats famous ( or infamous ) ie the Daisy ad , would be permitted in the new age of censorship and oppression Social media giant Facebook has removed Trump campaign ads which refer to an online survey as the “ Official 2020 Congressional District Census , ” claiming the ads violate the company ’ s policy on disinformation and interference with the 2020 census .
The Wall Street Journal reports that social media giant Facebook has removed campaign ads from the Trump Make America Great Again Committee that referred to an online @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the ads violated a company policy designed to prevent the spread of disinformation and other interference relating to the nationwide 2020 census which is set to go online next week .
The ads from the Trump campaign began running online last week and asked people to take the “ Official 2020 Congressional District Census ” which then directed Facebook users to a website for fundraising to support President Trump ’ s re-election .
The ads stated : “ The information we gather from this survey will help us craft our strategies for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week that it was the first time that the company had removed a Trump campaign ad for violating its census interference policy , with a spokesperson stating : “ There are policies to prevent confusion around the U.S. Census , and this is an example of those being enforced.
” The banned ads were paid for by Trump Make America Great Again Committee , a joint fundraising committee of Donald J. Trump for President Inc. and the Republican National Committee .
Facebook has come under intense pressure recently to fact check political ads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it has refused to do .
It appears that the removal of the Trump campaign ’ s ads are the first recent political ads on its platform to be heavily scrutinized and removed .
Some of the campaign ads are still active on the platform while others were removed , as of Thursday afternoon .
Democrats on Capitol Hill criticized the ads with House Peaker Nancy Pelosi ( D-CA ) stating before the ads were removed : “ This is , on the part of Facebook , a robust unacceptable interference in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Pelosi added : “ I know the profit motive is their business model , but it should not come at the cost of counting who is in our country so that we can provide the services.
” In December , Facebook announced a new policy designed to prevent census interference by banning misleading information about “ when and how to participate in the census and the consequences of participating.
” The social media firm also banned any ads that portray census participation “ as useless or meaningless ” or advising people not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and chief executive of the Education Fund which was a group that worked with Facebook to develop appropriate rules to prohibit census interference on its platform , criticized the time it took Facebook to remove the Trump campaign ’ s ads , saying : “ While we ’ re gratified that Facebook shut down Trump ’ s attempt to sow confusion about how and when to participate in the 2020 Census , it ’ s disturbing that the ads weren ’ t immediately removed .
”

Ironically, none of the ads that made Democrats famous (or infamous), i.e. the Daisy ad, would be permitted in the new age of censorship and oppression.
Facebook Censors Trump Campaign Ads, Claims ‘Census Interference’
By:Lucas Nolan, Breitbart, 6 Mar 20201,034
Social media giant Facebook has removed Trump campaign ads which refer to an online survey as the “Official 2020 Congressional District Census,” claiming the ads violate the company’s policy on disinformation and interference with the 2020 census.
The Wall Street Journal reports that social media giant Facebook has removed campaign ads from the Trump Make America Great Again Committee that referred to an online survey as a census.
Facebook alleges that the ads violated a company policy designed to prevent the spread of disinformation and other interference relating to the nationwide 2020 census which is set to go online next week.
The ads from the Trump campaign began running online last week and asked people to take the “Official 2020 Congressional District Census” which then directed Facebook users to a website for fundraising to support President Trump’s re-election. The ads stated: “The information we gather from this survey will help us craft our strategies for YOUR CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.”
Facebook stated this week that it was the first time that the company had removed a Trump campaign ad for violating its census interference policy, with a spokesperson stating: “There are policies to prevent confusion around the U.S. Census, and this is an example of those being enforced.”
The banned ads were paid for by Trump Make America Great Again Committee, a joint fundraising committee of Donald J. Trump for President Inc. and the Republican National Committee. Facebook has come under intense pressure recently to fact check political ads on its platform, which so far it has refused to do. It appears that the removal of the Trump campaign’s ads are the first recent political ads on its platform to be heavily scrutinized and removed.
Some of the campaign ads are still active on the platform while others were removed, as of Thursday afternoon. Democrats on Capitol Hill criticized the ads with House Peaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) stating before the ads were removed: “This is, on the part of Facebook, a robust unacceptable interference in the census.” At her weekly news conference, Pelosi added: “I know the profit motive is their business model, but it should not come at the cost of counting who is in our country so that we can provide the services.”
In December, Facebook announced a new policy designed to prevent census interference by banning misleading information about “when and how to participate in the census and the consequences of participating.” The social media firm also banned any ads that portray census participation “as useless or meaningless” or advising people not to participate.
Vanita Gupta, president and chief executive of the Education Fund which was a group that worked with Facebook to develop appropriate rules to prohibit census interference on its platform, criticized the time it took Facebook to remove the Trump campaign’s ads, saying: “While we’re gratified that Facebook shut down Trump’s attempt to sow confusion about how and when to participate in the 2020 Census, it’s disturbing that the ads weren’t immediately removed.”


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--American Taxpayers Billed Up to $133,000 Per Refugee Resettled in the U.S.

President Trump is doing everything in his power to correct this injustice .
Study : American Taxpayers Billed up to $ 133K per Refugee Resettled in U.S. American taxpayers are billed up to $ 133,000 per refugee resettled in the United States over the course of a lifetime , a new study reveals .
Research by the Center for Immigration Studies ( CIS ) finds that each refugee resettled in the U.S. cost American taxpayers anywhere on average between $ 60,000 and $ 133,000 over the course of a lifetime .
CIS researchers said the average refugee will cost taxpayers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though adult refugees — due to their low educational attainment — cost taxpayers upwards of $ 133,000 .
“ No plausible model , not even the National Academies ’ best-case scenario , comes close to suggesting that refugees who enter as adults will be net fiscal contributors , ” CIS researchers note .
“ Refugee-specific costs add about 22 percent over and above the cost of other immigrants , but low education by itself is enough to push adult refugees ’ estimated fiscal impact well into negative territory.
” The researchers argue “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ greater number of displaced people overseas rather than paying to settle them ” in the U.S. “ Overseas assistance could allow some refugees to eventually resettle in countries where they have stronger cultural or historical ties than they do with the United States , ” the CIS researchers write .
For Fiscal Year 2020 , Trump will continue cutting refugee admissions by reducing former President Barack Obama ’ s refugee inflow by at least 80 percent .
This reduction would mean a maximum of 18,000 refugees can be resettled in the U.S. between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 30 , 2020 .
This is merely a numerical limit and not a goal federal officials are supposed to reach .
Trump sought to allow American communities and states to have a say in whether they wanted to resettle refugees in their towns and cities , giving them veto power .
A federal judge , though , has temporarily blocked that executive order from taking effect .
The federally mandated refugee resettlement program has brought more than 977,000 refugees to the U.S. between 2002 and 2019 — a population nearly double the size @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In that period , about 109,000 refugees have been resettled in California , 85,000 resettled in Texas , nearly 59,000 resettled in New York , and more than 48,000 resettled in Florida .
Refugee resettlement costs American taxpayers nearly $ 9 billion every five years , according to the latest research .
Over the course of five years , an estimated 16 percent of all refugees admitted will need housing assistance paid for by taxpayers .

Forced to work the Democrat plantation. Harder! Faster!
President Trump is doing everything in his power to correct this injustice.
Related
Study: American Taxpayers Billed up to $133K per Refugee Resettled in U.S.
By John Binder, Breitbart, 5 Mar 2020:
American taxpayers are billed up to $133,000 per refugee resettled in the United States over the course of a lifetime, a new study reveals.
Research by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) finds that each refugee resettled in the U.S. cost American taxpayers anywhere on average between $60,000 and $133,000 over the course of a lifetime.
CIS researchers said the average refugee will cost taxpayers roughly $60,000 over a lifetime, though adult refugees — due to their low educational attainment — cost taxpayers upwards of $133,000.
“No plausible model, not even the National Academies’ best-case scenario, comes close to suggesting that refugees who enter as adults will be net fiscal contributors,” CIS researchers note. “Refugee-specific costs add about 22 percent over and above the cost of other immigrants, but low education by itself is enough to push adult refugees’ estimated fiscal impact well into negative territory.”
The researchers argue “it may be possible to help a greater number of displaced people overseas rather than paying to settle them” in the U.S.
“Overseas assistance could allow some refugees to eventually resettle in countries where they have stronger cultural or historical ties than they do with the United States,” the CIS researchers write.
For Fiscal Year 2020, Trump will continue cutting refugee admissions by reducing former President Barack Obama’s refugee inflow by at least 80 percent. This reduction would mean a maximum of 18,000 refugees can be resettled in the U.S. between October 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020. This is merely a numerical limit and not a goal federal officials are supposed to reach.
Trump sought to allow American communities and states to have a say in whether they wanted to resettle refugees in their towns and cities, giving them veto power. A federal judge, though, has temporarily blocked that executive order from taking effect.
The federally mandated refugee resettlement program has brought more than 977,000 refugees to the U.S. between 2002 and 2019 — a population nearly double the size of Wyoming, where 577,000 residents live. In that period, about 109,000 refugees have been resettled in California, 85,000 resettled in Texas, nearly 59,000 resettled in New York, and more than 48,000 resettled in Florida.
Refugee resettlement costs American taxpayers nearly $9 billion every five years, according to the latest research. Over the course of five years, an estimated 16 percent of all refugees admitted will need housing assistance paid for by taxpayers.


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--BLOWBACK: Mitt Romney flips on plot to betray Republicans (again) in vote against subpoena for Hunte

BLOWBACK: Mitt Romney flips on plot to betray Republicans (again) in vote against subpoena for Hunter Biden

The question is , do the Dems have compromising photos of Romney with a farm animal or is he just a complete POS ?
He was the sole Republican to sign on to the coup against the President , a case built on smears and lies .
But when faced with real malfeasance by a corrupt , criminal Dem who used his position of power for his own nefarious ends , Romney works to help them cover it up .
My money is on farm animal .
Mitt Romney to betray Republicans again : hints at voting against subpoena for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investigations are done by an independent , non-political body , ” Sen. Mitt Romney , ( R-UT ) , told the Washington Post .
Reuters reported last week that the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee would vote to approve a subpoena aimed at gathering information related to a former Ukrainian diplomat with ties to the consulting firm Blue Star Strategies .
The allegation is that the company used Hunter Biden for access to the State Department , at the time Joe Biden was vice president .
“ There ’ s no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into Burisma and Hunter Biden appears political .
And I think people are tired of these kinds of political investigations , ” said Mitt Romney .
If the Republican Senator from Utah would vote Romney ’ s vote against the subpoena the result would be a 7-7 tie .
Right now the Republicans maintain an 8-to-6 majority in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee .
Last month , Mitt Romney was the only Republican to vote to convict President Trump of abuse of power for his alleged pressure on Ukraine to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his political opponent .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Please contribute to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

The question is, do the Dems have compromising photos of Romney with a farm animal or is he just a complete POS? He was the sole Republican to sign on to the coup against the President, a case built on smears and lies. But when faced with real malfeasance by a corrupt, criminal Dem who used his position of power for his own nefarious ends, Romney works to help them cover it up.
My money is on farm animal.
Mitt Romney to betray Republicans again: hints at voting against subpoena for Hunter Biden By: Staff Writer, Sara Carter, March 6, 2020: “I would prefer that investigations are done by an independent, non-political body,” Sen. Mitt Romney, (R-UT), told the Washington Post. Reuters reported last week that the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee would vote to approve a subpoena aimed at gathering information related to a former Ukrainian diplomat with ties to the consulting firm Blue Star Strategies. The allegation is that the company used Hunter Biden for access to the State Department, at the time Joe Biden was vice president. “There’s no question but that the appearance of looking into Burisma and Hunter Biden appears political. And I think people are tired of these kinds of political investigations,” said Mitt Romney. If the Republican Senator from Utah would vote Romney’s vote against the subpoena the result would be a 7-7 tie. Right now the Republicans maintain an 8-to-6 majority in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Last month, Mitt Romney was the only Republican to vote to convict President Trump of abuse of power for his alleged pressure on Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden, his political opponent.
UPDATE:
NEW: @MittRomney will NOT block subpoenas in the Homeland Security Cmte as a part of the GOP investigation into Burisma (which he has criticized, saying the investigation "appears political"), per a spox. Stmt from spox @LJ0hnson is here: pic.twitter.com/y59R9nprCA — Frank Thorp V (@frankthorp) March 6, 2020
https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1235982283221487617
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--‘Don’t like to see little girls in veils? Move out of Sweden’: Muslim teacher to Muslim politician

If anyone is surprised , you haven ’ t been paying attention .
Muslims are the only immigrant group to come to the West with a ready-made model of society that their religion dictates is superior to man-made law .
Muslim teacher and Muslim politician clash on live TV in Sweden Loubna Stensaker Goransson ( L ) and Naouel Aissaoui ( R ) debating the headscarf ban in schools The exchange between Naouel Aissaoui , a school teacher in the Swedish municipality of Skurup , and local politician Loubna Stensaker Goransson was over a ban on veils in public schools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enacted in December .
The decision angered many educators , and Aissaoui is among those leading the pushback : “ Move away if it annoys you , ” Aissaoui said during a TV debate after her opponent said she disliked seeing little girls wearing the veil .
“ This is my country , too.
” Both women are Muslim and of immigrant background , but have opposing views on what the headscarf represents and whether it has a place in modern Sweden .
During the debate , Goransson said people could not expect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is secular and equal and live with medieval values.
” She sees the controversial piece of clothing as a tool of oppression and sexualization of little girls , and not as a symbol of purity and goodness , as Aissaoui does .
There is also a strong sentiment among many Swedes that the newcomers have no intention of integrating culturally and would rather isolate themselves in their own communities than adopt the customs of their hosts , but talking about the negative side of welcoming droves of asylum seekers is a challenge , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy towards refugees as a matter of national pride , which opened a window of opportunity for politicians , who previously remained on the margins .
The Skurup headscarf ban was pushed by the right-wing anti-immigration Sweden Democrats ( SD ) party , which used to be a political pariah , but saw a rapid surge in popularity over the past several years .
The SD has a majority in the municipality council and has found allies in people like Goransson , who is a member of the Moderates , to enact the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the ban .
Mattias Liedholm , the headmaster of Skurup ’ s largest school , declared the ban illegal and said he would not enforce it .
His uncompromising position however was not shared by as many fellow Moderates as he probably hoped , so last week he announced he was leaving the party .
The SD ’ s suggestion to people not happy with the policy is remarkably similar to that of Aissaoui : “ If you find it so important to wear a headscarf , you go to Saudi Arabia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to lend a hand if you forget that headscarf , ” said Lars Nystrom , a Skurup council member for the SDs .

If anyone is surprised, you haven’t been paying attention. Muslims are the only immigrant group to come to the West with a ready-made model of society that their religion dictates is superior to man-made law.
Muslim teacher and Muslim politician clash on live TV in Sweden
By: RT, March 6, 2020:
Loubna Stensaker Goransson (L) and Naouel Aissaoui (R) debating the headscarf ban in schools
The exchange between Naouel Aissaoui, a school teacher in the Swedish municipality of Skurup, and local politician Loubna Stensaker Goransson was over a ban on veils in public schools, which Goransson and other council officials enacted in December. The decision angered many educators, and Aissaoui is among those leading the pushback: “Move away if it annoys you,” Aissaoui said during a TV debate after her opponent said she disliked seeing little girls wearing the veil. “This is my country, too.”
Both women are Muslim and of immigrant background, but have opposing views on what the headscarf represents and whether it has a place in modern Sweden. During the debate, Goransson said people could not expect to “come to a country that is secular and equal and live with medieval values.” She sees the controversial piece of clothing as a tool of oppression and sexualization of little girls, and not as a symbol of purity and goodness, as Aissaoui does.
Video here.
There is also a strong sentiment among many Swedes that the newcomers have no intention of integrating culturally and would rather isolate themselves in their own communities than adopt the customs of their hosts, but talking about the negative side of welcoming droves of asylum seekers is a challenge, since Sweden has long hailed its open-door policy towards refugees as a matter of national pride, which opened a window of opportunity for politicians, who previously remained on the margins.
The Skurup headscarf ban was pushed by the right-wing anti-immigration Sweden Democrats (SD) party, which used to be a political pariah, but saw a rapid surge in popularity over the past several years. The SD has a majority in the municipality council and has found allies in people like Goransson, who is a member of the Moderates, to enact the headscarf ban. Others became vocal opponents of the ban. Mattias Liedholm, the headmaster of Skurup’s largest school, declared the ban illegal and said he would not enforce it. His uncompromising position however was not shared by as many fellow Moderates as he probably hoped, so last week he announced he was leaving the party.
The SD’s suggestion to people not happy with the policy is remarkably similar to that of Aissaoui: “If you find it so important to wear a headscarf, you go to Saudi Arabia or Iran. The police are happy to lend a hand if you forget that headscarf,” said Lars Nystrom, a Skurup council member for the SDs.
Source:
https://www.expressen.se/kvallsposten/mattias-liedholm-lamnar-moderaterna-efter-slojdebatt/
https://nos.nl/artikel/2321771-zweedse-integratie-2-0-een-hoofddoekverbod-op-school.html


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--BULLY Hillary Clinton attacks  Melania Trump

Beauty and the beast .
This is something out of “ Brothers Grimm ” tale .
As for “ bullying , ” let ’ s ask Bill Clinton ’ s sex abuse/rape victims , or even better – Vince Foster .
Hillary Clinton slams Melania Trump cyberbullying initiative : ‘ She should look closer to home ’ Hillary Clinton mocked first lady Melania Trump ’ s “ Be Best ” initiative , saying Trump should focus on the behavior of her own husband .
Clinton was asked about Trump ’ s platform , which concentrates on the well-being of children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during an appearance Thursday on Bravo ’ s Watch What Happens Live .
“ What do you honestly think of first lady Melania Trump ’ s cyberbullying initiative ?
” host Andy Cohen asked .
“ I think she should look closer to home , ” Clinton said .
The president reportedly tried to convince his wife to choose a topic other than cyberbullying , warning her that she could face criticism over his use of social media to attack his critics .
Trump has publicly acknowledged that she ’ s aware of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s use of Twitter and whether it contradicts her initiative .
She ’ s said that the skepticism won ’ t stop her from addressing the issues .

Beauty and the beast. This is something out of “Brothers Grimm” tale. As for “bullying,” let’s ask Bill Clinton’s sex abuse/rape victims, or even better – Vince Foster.
Hillary Clinton slams Melania Trump cyberbullying initiative: ‘She should look closer to home’ by Caitlin Yilek|, Washington Examiner, March 06, 2020: Hillary Clinton mocked first lady Melania Trump’s “Be Best” initiative, saying Trump should focus on the behavior of her own husband. Clinton was asked about Trump’s platform, which concentrates on the well-being of children, cyberbullying, and opioid abuse, during an appearance Thursday on Bravo’s Watch What Happens Live. “What do you honestly think of first lady Melania Trump’s cyberbullying initiative?” host Andy Cohen asked. “I think she should look closer to home,” Clinton said. The president reportedly tried to convince his wife to choose a topic other than cyberbullying, warning her that she could face criticism over his use of social media to attack his critics. Trump has publicly acknowledged that she’s aware of the scrutiny brought on by the president’s use of Twitter and whether it contradicts her initiative. She’s said that the skepticism won’t stop her from addressing the issues.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--US House Democrats block bill opposing boycott of Jews (BDS)

As expected the neo-Nazi Democrat Party blocked legislation to combat the anti-Semitic BDS movement .
To add insult to injury , this act of betrayal is just days after the AIPAC Policy Conference .
A strong pro-Israel Jewish organization in the United States is urgently needed .
An organization that is not afraid to go to war against the anti-Semitic Left .
# Jexodus !
Democrats blocked a bill on Wednesday in the U.S. House of Representatives that would have prohibited U.S. support for the anti-Israel BDS movement .
The Israel Anti-Boycott Act , introduced by Rep. Lee Zeldin ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to include prohibiting U.S. support for foreign boycotts of Israel from groups including the European Union and the U.N. Human Rights Council .
Lawmakers defeated consideration of the bill by a tally of 219-194 .
“ We can not be quiet when it comes to combating anti-Semitism and anti-Israel mentalities , ” said Rep. Debbie Lesko ( R-Ariz. ) on the House floor .
“ We need to work together in Congress and pass common-sense legislation on this issue .
H.R .
5595 does just that.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ turning it into a pariah state , cut off from all trade , tourism , military , diplomatic and cultural ties with the rest of the world , ” said Zeldin , who mentioned in his speech on the House floor about the U.N. Human Rights Council releasing a blacklist of companies that do business in the West Bank .
The bill stated that it would not apply to “ a person ’ s noncommercial speech or other noncommercial expressive activity.
” Democrats have been reluctant to support anti-BDS legislation due to First @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether that rationale was the reason that House Democrats blocked the bill .
The Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contribute to our ground-breaking work here .
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

As expected the neo-Nazi Democrat Party blocked legislation to combat the anti-Semitic BDS movement. To add insult to injury, this act of betrayal is just days after the AIPAC Policy Conference. A strong pro-Israel Jewish organization in the United States is urgently needed. An organization that is not afraid to go to war against the anti-Semitic Left. #Jexodus!
The Democrats have picked a side. And they are Not on the side of Israel. https://t.co/bPQGMyCD7a — Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) March 5, 2020
FLOOR ALERT: @HouseDemocrats just blocked @RepDLesko & @RepLeeZeldin's request for the House to stand with Israel & combat the hate-fueled BDS movement. We cannot stay quiet when it comes to one of our strongest allies. pic.twitter.com/5ZDeUqNSNH — House Rules Republicans (@RulesReps) March 4, 2020
US House Democrats block anti-BDS bill By JNS, March 5, 2020: Democrats blocked a bill on Wednesday in the U.S. House of Representatives that would have prohibited U.S. support for the anti-Israel BDS movement. The Israel Anti-Boycott Act, introduced by Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), would have expanded the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to include prohibiting U.S. support for foreign boycotts of Israel from groups including the European Union and the U.N. Human Rights Council. Lawmakers defeated consideration of the bill by a tally of 219-194. “We cannot be quiet when it comes to combating anti-Semitism and anti-Israel mentalities,” said Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) on the House floor. “We need to work together in Congress and pass common-sense legislation on this issue. H.R. 5595 does just that.”
FLOOR ALERT: @HouseDemocrats just blocked @RepDLesko & @RepLeeZeldin's request for the House to stand with Israel & combat the hate-fueled BDS movement. We cannot stay quiet when it comes to one of our strongest allies. pic.twitter.com/5ZDeUqNSNH — House Rules Republicans (@RulesReps) March 4, 2020
“BDS tries to delegitimize Israel by turning it into a pariah state, cut off from all trade, tourism, military, diplomatic and cultural ties with the rest of the world,” said Zeldin, who mentioned in his speech on the House floor about the U.N. Human Rights Council releasing a blacklist of companies that do business in the West Bank. The bill stated that it would not apply to “a person’s noncommercial speech or other noncommercial expressive activity.” Democrats have been reluctant to support anti-BDS legislation due to First Amendment concerns, although it is unclear whether that rationale was the reason that House Democrats blocked the bill.
https://youtu.be/Hw_dEbseo2g
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--Nazi flag at Bernie Sanders rally

Nazi flag at Bernie Sanders rally

The socialist policies of the Nazis mirror Bernie ’ s .
So does the antisemitism of the Democrat party .
Moments after Sen. Bernie Sanders ( I-Vt. ) took the stage at his campaign rally in Phoenix Thursday night …… .
[ … . ]
one man standing behind the senator in an upper section of the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum wasn ’ t waving a “ Bernie ” sign like many of those around him .
Instead , the man was holding a red flag above his head — and it was emblazoned with a swastika .
“ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a national surrogate for the Sanders campaign , told The Washington Post .
“ I never thought I would have seen a swastika at a political event .
It ’ s gross.
” While people near the unidentified protester quickly ripped the offending item out of his hands and he was removed from the arena , the mere appearance of a Nazi flag at an event dedicated to a democratic socialist who could become the country ’ s first Jewish president sparked outcry .
The moment , captured in videos and photos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , was denounced as an act of anti-Semitism and prompted increased concerns about Sanders ’ s safety on the campaign trail .
“ We can argue about which candidate should get the Dem nomination , but anti-Semitic acts have no place in this world , ” tweeted Steven Slugocki , chairman of the Maricopa County Democratic Party .
“ This is absolutely abhorrent.
” Sanders ’ s campaign did not respond to a request for comment late Thursday .
A spokesperson for the senator told BuzzFeed News reporter Ruby Cramer that Sanders “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ swastika on it and is disturbed by it .
”

The socialist policies of the Nazis mirror Bernie’s. So does the antisemitism of the Democrat party.
Nazi flag at Sanders rally sparks outcry, concerns about safety By Allyson Chiu, WaPo, March 6, 2020 : Moments after Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) took the stage at his campaign rally in Phoenix Thursday night ……. [….] one man standing behind the senator in an upper section of the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum wasn’t waving a “Bernie” sign like many of those around him. Instead, the man was holding a red flag above his head — and it was emblazoned with a swastika. “It was absolutely wild,” Brianna Westbrook, a national surrogate for the Sanders campaign, told The Washington Post. “I never thought I would have seen a swastika at a political event. It’s gross.” While people near the unidentified protester quickly ripped the offending item out of his hands and he was removed from the arena, the mere appearance of a Nazi flag at an event dedicated to a democratic socialist who could become the country’s first Jewish president sparked outcry. The moment, captured in videos and photos that circulated on social media Thursday night, was denounced as an act of anti-Semitism and prompted increased concerns about Sanders’s safety on the campaign trail. “We can argue about which candidate should get the Dem nomination, but anti-Semitic acts have no place in this world,” tweeted Steven Slugocki, chairman of the Maricopa County Democratic Party. “This is absolutely abhorrent.” Sanders’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment late Thursday. A spokesperson for the senator told BuzzFeed News reporter Ruby Cramer that Sanders “is aware of the flag with the swastika on it and is disturbed by it.”
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here


pamelagellerreport--2020-03-06--True Tales From the Annals of Crazistan (Part 1)

Here at Memri.org there is one more example from the annals of the Islamic world ’ s political dementia .
The Executive Summary is below : Former Jordanian MP Muhammad Tu ’ mah Al-Qudah said in a January 2 , 2020 show on Yarmouk TV ( Jordan ) that there is a conspiracy to empty the Arab countries , particularly those surrounding Israel , of men by getting them to marry American women and to emigrate to the United States .
In a January 9 , 2020 episode of the show , he said that homosexuals constitute one sixth of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they are “ ruling the world.
” He said that 150 of President Obama ’ s White House employees were homosexuals and that this is why he legislated laws to protect gays .
In addition , Al-Qudah claimed that 97 % of the homosexuals in America receive psychiatric care .
Furthermore , he said : “ 92 % of [ American homosexuals ] commit suicide , and we pray to Allah that more of them [ kill themselves ] .
” He added : “ Their minds are like those of apes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conspiracy to “ empty the Arab countries…of men by getting them to marry American women.
” The Muslim men are not being tricked into marrying these women ; it is they who are doing the tricking , marrying them only in order to get green cards .
And Al-Hudah , who paints what he considers to be a terrible picture of America , never explains why it is that so many Arab males would want to live in such a country full of “ depraved ” homosexuals who control everything .
So Muslim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do , making marriages of convenience in order to be admitted to the advanced West , are presented as the helpless victims of a conspiracy to “ empty the Arab countries [ of young males ] .
” And so many countries are involved –America , Canada , Australia , and all of Europe — all of them flinging “ open the gates of immigration ” to those Muslim males .
Al-Qudah , then , sees those who make Muslim immigration to their own countries easier as damaging Muslim interests , by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries of their males .
But wait – isn ’ t it true that President Trump has limited Muslim immigration , with what some describe as his “ Muslim ban ” ?
Does Al-Qudah deplore that “ Muslim ban ” as unfair to Muslims or , following his logic , does he applaud it because it means more Muslim males will stay in their own countries , instead of moving to America ?
And is Al-Qudah aware of the Muslim leaders and clerics who have confidently predicted that their “ demographic jihad ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the West .
What does he think of that prediction ?
Surely at some level it should please him .
The conspiracy Muhammad Al-Qudah has uncovered has to do with Jews – did you have any doubt ?
— because these Muslims who are leaving for the West are mostly from the Arab countries “ surrounding the state belonging to the Jews.
” These Muslim males have been deceived , it seems , into wanting to settle in the West .
For only trickery and deception can possibly explain why someone would prefer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gaza , or live in Canada rather than Egypt , or move to America rather than stay in Jordan .
Al-Qudah does not explain why so many Muslims want to move to the West ; it is enough that we know – take it from him — that a conspiracy involving those who are doing Israel ’ s bidding by emptying out the Arab countries that surround it , is at work .
Of course Al-Qudah offers no proof of such an emptying out , because there is none .
Egypt ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now hit 100 million ; Egyptian officials regard this population increase as the chief challenge to Egyptian well-being , and are devoting massive resources to persuading people to have fewer children .
Perhaps Al-Qudah thinks the Egyptian authorities are also being manipulated by those clever Zionists .
In his view , the more Egyptians there are , the better , no matter how wretched overpopulation has made the lot of so many .
As for his own country , Jordan , its population continues to increase in a steep upward curve ; the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
There has been no observable large-scale movement of Egyptian or Jordanian males to the West .
The only neighbor of Israel where there has been a population decline is Syria ; a nine-year civil war has claimed the lives of a half million people ; five million people also fled the country as refugees .
There was no conspiracy from the West , or from Israel , to decrease the Syrian population ; it was the natural result of war .
Those powerful American homosexuals who , according to Al-Qudah , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a very good job of emptying out Israel ’ s neighbors of their young males .
Egypt and Jordan are experiencing sky-high population growth .
No , there is no such absurd saying , though it clearly pleases Muhammad Al-Qudah to think of his fellow Muslim males as sexual studs ( “ stallions ” ) , for whom American women pine .
What ’ s a Muslim male to do ?
He needs to marry an American to be assured of a green card .
But if he does , then he ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He “ might get AIDS , ” warns Muhammad Al-Qudah .
But what does the data tell us ?
There are two million marriages in the US every year .
There are 37,000 new cases of AIDS reported , and of those , almost three-quarters occur among homosexual males , not married couples .
So how likely is it that that a Muslim male marrying an American woman “ might get AIDS ” ?
Not at all likely .
One for every two hundred marriages ?
Even less ?
Mathematics is not Muhammad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Truth Must be Told Please take a moment to consider this .
Now , more than ever , people are reading Geller Report for news they wo n't get anywhere else .
But advertising revenues have all but disappeared .
Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us .
Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts .
But we wo n't put up a paywall .
Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more .
Everyone who reads our reporting knows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media wo n't .
We can not do our ground-breaking report without your support .
We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left 's war on freedom .
Our readers ’ contributions make that possible .
Geller Report 's independent , investigative journalism takes a lot of time , money and hard work to produce .
But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight , too .
Please contribute to our ground-breaking work here .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best .

Here at Memri.org there is one more example from the annals of the Islamic world’s political dementia. The Executive Summary is below:
Former Jordanian MP Muhammad Tu’mah Al-Qudah said in a January 2, 2020 show on Yarmouk TV (Jordan) that there is a conspiracy to empty the Arab countries, particularly those surrounding Israel, of men by getting them to marry American women and to emigrate to the United States. In a January 9, 2020 episode of the show, he said that homosexuals constitute one sixth of the population in the United States and that they are “ruling the world.” He said that 150 of President Obama’s White House employees were homosexuals and that this is why he legislated laws to protect gays. In addition, Al-Qudah claimed that 97% of the homosexuals in America receive psychiatric care. Furthermore, he said: “92% of [American homosexuals] commit suicide, and we pray to Allah that more of them [kill themselves].” He added: “Their minds are like those of apes and pigs.” The Transcript: January 2, 2020 Muhammad Tu’mah Al-Qudah: Muslim men marry American women in order to secure Green Cards.
But there is no conspiracy to “empty the Arab countries…of men by getting them to marry American women.” The Muslim men are not being tricked into marrying these women; it is they who are doing the tricking, marrying them only in order to get green cards.
And Al-Hudah, who paints what he considers to be a terrible picture of America, never explains why it is that so many Arab males would want to live in such a country full of “depraved” homosexuals who control everything.
Today we are facing a scheme to empty the Arab countries of males – particularly the countries surrounding the state belonging to the Jews. This is why they open the gates of immigration to America, Canada, Australia, and Europe.
So Muslim males, doing exactly what they wish to do, making marriages of convenience in order to be admitted to the advanced West, are presented as the helpless victims of a conspiracy to “empty the Arab countries [of young males].” And so many countries are involved –America, Canada, Australia, and all of Europe — all of them flinging “open the gates of immigration” to those Muslim males. Al-Qudah, then, sees those who make Muslim immigration to their own countries easier as damaging Muslim interests, by helping to “empty out” Muslim countries of their males. But wait – isn’t it true that President Trump has limited Muslim immigration, with what some describe as his “Muslim ban”? Does Al-Qudah deplore that “Muslim ban” as unfair to Muslims or, following his logic, does he applaud it because it means more Muslim males will stay in their own countries, instead of moving to America? And is Al-Qudah aware of the Muslim leaders and clerics who have confidently predicted that their“demographic jihad” will ultimately allow Muslims to take over the West. What does he think of that prediction? Surely at some level it should please him.
The conspiracy Muhammad Al-Qudah has uncovered has to do with Jews – did you have any doubt? — because these Muslims who are leaving for the West are mostly from the Arab countries “surrounding the state belonging to the Jews.” These Muslim males have been deceived, it seems, into wanting to settle in the West. For only trickery and deception can possibly explain why someone would prefer to live in Sweden rather than in Gaza, or live in Canada rather than Egypt, or move to America rather than stay in Jordan. Al-Qudah does not explain why so many Muslims want to move to the West; it is enough that we know – take it from him — that a conspiracy involving those who are doing Israel’s bidding by emptying out the Arab countries that surround it, is at work.
Of course Al-Qudah offers no proof of such an emptying out, because there is none. Egypt’s population continues to soar; it has now hit 100 million; Egyptian officials regard this population increase as the chief challenge to Egyptian well-being, and are devoting massive resources to persuading people to have fewer children. Perhaps Al-Qudah thinks the Egyptian authorities are also being manipulated by those clever Zionists. In his view, the more Egyptians there are, the better, no matter how wretched overpopulation has made the lot of so many. As for his own country, Jordan, its population continues to increase in a steep upward curve; the country now has more than ten million people. There has been no observable large-scale movement of Egyptian or Jordanian males to the West. The only neighbor of Israel where there has been a population decline is Syria; a nine-year civil war has claimed the lives of a half million people; five million people also fled the country as refugees. There was no conspiracy from the West, or from Israel, to decrease the Syrian population; it was the natural result of war. Those powerful American homosexuals who, according to Al-Qudah, run the world, are not doing a very good job of emptying out Israel’s neighbors of their young males. Egypt and Jordan are experiencing sky-high population growth.
Young people who are at their peak and who should be building their countries are immigrating to America. They [the Americans] even have a saying: “We want their stallions to immigrate to America.”
No, there is no such absurd saying, though it clearly pleases Muhammad Al-Qudah to think of his fellow Muslim males as sexual studs (“stallions”), for whom American women pine.
When a man marries an American he’s done for. If he marries an American, he might get AIDS. We’re not saying that there aren’t any good people there, but we are talking about the general framework, and we will talk about some terrifying statistics later.
What’s a Muslim male to do? He needs to marry an American to be assured of a green card. But if he does, then he’s “done for.” How? He “might get AIDS,” warns Muhammad Al-Qudah. But what does the data tell us? There are two million marriages in the US every year. There are 37,000 new cases of AIDS reported, and of those, almost three-quarters occur among homosexual males, not married couples. So how likely is it that that a Muslim male marrying an American woman “might get AIDS”? Not at all likely. One for every two hundred marriages? Even less? Mathematics is not Muhammad Al-Qudah’s strong suit.
The Truth Must be Told Your contribution supports independent journalism Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more. Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible. Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too. Please contribute here. or Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best. $25.00 here
$50.00 here
$75.00 here
$100.00 here
$250.00 here