australiannationalreview--2020-08-03--Covid-19 Vaccines With ‘Minor Side Effects’ Could Still Be Pretty Bad

Covid-19 Vaccines With ‘ Minor Side Effects ’ Could Still Be Pretty Bad .
The risk of nasty side effects in the Moderna and Oxford trials should be made clear now , before it ends up as fodder for the skeptics .
MORE GOOD NEWS on progress toward an escape route from this pandemic : On Monday , vaccine researchers from Oxford University and the pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca announced results from a “ Phase I/II trial , ” suggesting their product might be able to generate immunity without causing serious harm .
Similar , but smaller-scale results , ere posted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ produced by the biotech firm Moderna , in collaboration with the US National Institutes of Health .
As both these groups and others push ahead into the final phase of testing , it ’ s vital that the public has a clear and balanced understanding of this work—one that cuts through all the marketing and hype .
But we ’ re not off to a good start .
The evidence so far suggests that we ’ re getting blinkered by these groups ’ PR , and so seduced by stories of their amazing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of everything else .
In particular , neither the mainstream media nor the medical press has given much attention to the two vaccines ’ potential downsides—in particular , their risk of nasty adverse effects , even if they ’ re not life-threatening .
This sort of puffery doesn ’ t only help to build a false impression ; it may also dry the tinder for the future spread of vaccine fearmongering .
Back in May , a CNN report described the Oxford group as being “ the most aggressive in painting the rosiest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ let ’ s start with them .
Just how rosy is the Oxford picture really ?
It ’ s certainly true that this week ’ s news shows the vaccine has the potential to provide protection from Covid-19 .
But there are flies in the ointment .
After the first clinical trial for this vaccine began in April , for example , the researchers added new study arms in which people got acetaminophen every six hours for 24 hours after the injection .
That ’ s not featured in their marketing , of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this unusual step in media coverage in early summer .
Newspapers only said the vaccine had been proven “ safe with rhesus monkeys , ” and did not cause any adverse effects in those animal tests .
It was a worrying signal though : How rough a ride were people having with this vaccine ?
Was the acetaminophen meant to keep down fever , headaches , malaise—or all of the above ?
Journalists could have pressed them on this issue months ago .
The first people to get vaccines are carefully picked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a negative reaction .
If the Oxford vaccine is knocking them around badly , it might not bode well for the rest of us .
Don ’ t get me wrong : A day or two of pain or illness wouldn ’ t deter me from getting an effective Covid-19 vaccine .
But I think we need to be prepared if that ’ s going to be the case .
The press release for Monday ’ s publication of results from the Oxford vaccine trials described an increased frequency of “ minor side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the actual paper , though , reveals this to be a marketing spin that has since been parroted in media reports .
( The phrases “ minor side effects ” or “ only minor side effects ” appeared in writeups from The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal and Reuters , among other outlets . )
Yes , mild reactions were far more common than worse ones .
But moderate or severe harms—defined as being bad enough to interfere with daily life or needing medical care—were common too .
Around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine without acetaminophen experienced moderate or severe chills , fatigue , headache , malaise , and/or feverishness .
Close to 10 percent had a fever of at least 100.4 degrees , and just over one-fourth developed moderate or severe muscle aches .
That ’ s a lot , in a young and healthy group of people—and the acetaminophen didn ’ t help much for most of those problems .
The paper ’ s authors designated the vaccine as “ acceptable ” and “ tolerated , ” but we don ’ t yet know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
If journalists don ’ t start asking tougher questions , this will become the perfect setup for anti-vaccine messaging : Here ’ s what they forgot to tell you about the risks … There is another red flag .
Clinical trials for other Covid-19 vaccines have placebo groups , where participants receive saline injections .
Only one of the Oxford vaccine trials is taking this approach , however ; the others instead compare the experimental treatment to an injected meningococcal vaccine .
There can be good reasons to do this : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ’ ve received an active vaccine , such as a skin reaction , making the trial more truly “ blind.
” But their use also opens the door to doubt-sowing claims that any harms of the new vaccine are getting buried among the harms already caused by the control-group , “ old ” vaccines .
Coverage of the Moderna vaccine reflects a different kind of pharma spin : the drip-feeding of selective data via press release .
On May 18 , Moderna put out some patchy , positive findings on interim outcomes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ followed that up with a stock offering—and company executives sold off nearly $ 30 million in shares into the feeding frenzy their press release created .
With last week ’ s paper from Moderna , results from that same group of people finally had their formal publication .
At the same time , the group registered a 30,000-person phase III clinical trial , specifying a pair of 100-microgram injections of the Covid-19 vaccine .
According to the press release from May , there were no serious adverse events for the people in that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s paper shows the full results : By the time they ’ d had two doses , every single one was showing signs of headaches , chills , or fatigue , and for at least 80 percent , this could have been enough to interfere with their normal activities .
A participant who had a severe reaction to a particularly high dose has talked in detail about how bad it was : If reactions even half as bad as this were to be common for some of these vaccines , they will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ community—and there could be a lot of people who are reluctant to get the second injection .
There is already a high level of misinformation and distrust about fast-tracked Covid-19 vaccines in the American community .
This week , a new preprint from Kin On Kwok and colleagues found that even a sizable proportion of nurses in Hong Kong would be hesitant to take one .
We may have a vaccine soon , say the authors of that paper , but “ communities are not ready to accept it.
” It won ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ notable evidence of harms keeps getting pushed off to the side .
It ’ s much better to be straight up about what it ’ s really like to take one of these vaccines .
Why would anyone trust the experts otherwise ?

Covid-19 Vaccines With ‘Minor Side Effects’ Could Still Be Pretty Bad.
By HILDA BASTIAN
The risk of nasty side effects in the Moderna and Oxford trials should be made clear now, before it ends up as fodder for the skeptics.
MORE GOOD NEWS on progress toward an escape route from this pandemic: On Monday, vaccine researchers from Oxford University and the pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca announced results from a “Phase I/II trial,” suggesting their product might be able to generate immunity without causing serious harm. Similar, but smaller-scale results, ere posted just last week for another candidate vaccine produced by the biotech firm Moderna, in collaboration with the US National Institutes of Health.
As both these groups and others push ahead into the final phase of testing, it’s vital that the public has a clear and balanced understanding of this work—one that cuts through all the marketing and hype. But we’re not off to a good start. The evidence so far suggests that we’re getting blinkered by these groups’ PR, and so seduced by stories of their amazing speed that we’re losing track of everything else. In particular, neither the mainstream media nor the medical press has given much attention to the two vaccines’ potential downsides—in particular, their risk of nasty adverse effects, even if they’re not life-threatening. This sort of puffery doesn’t only help to build a false impression; it may also dry the tinder for the future spread of vaccine fearmongering.
If journalists don’t start asking tougher questions, this will become the perfect setup for anti-vaccine messaging: Here’s what they forgot to tell you about the risks …
Back in May, a CNN report described the Oxford group as being “the most aggressive in painting the rosiest picture” of its product, so let’s start with them. Just how rosy is the Oxford picture really? It’s certainly true that this week’s news shows the vaccine has the potential to provide protection from Covid-19. But there are flies in the ointment. After the first clinical trial for this vaccine began in April, for example, the researchers added new study arms in which people got acetaminophen every six hours for 24 hours after the injection. That’s not featured in their marketing, of course, and I saw no discussion of this unusual step in media coverage in early summer. Newspapers only said the vaccine had been proven “safe with rhesus monkeys,” and did not cause any adverse effects in those animal tests. It was a worrying signal though: How rough a ride were people having with this vaccine? Was the acetaminophen meant to keep down fever, headaches, malaise—or all of the above?
The Oxford group is also giving acetaminophen to participants in an advanced, phase III trial now underway in Brazil too. In another major study of the vaccine, involving 10,000 people in the UK, you can’t participate if you have an allergy or condition that could be made worse with acetaminophen. No mention of the extra drug, though, in the same group’s trial in South Africa.
Journalists could have pressed them on this issue months ago. The first people to get vaccines are carefully picked to be the least likely to have a negative reaction. If the Oxford vaccine is knocking them around badly, it might not bode well for the rest of us. Don’t get me wrong: A day or two of pain or illness wouldn’t deter me from getting an effective Covid-19 vaccine. But I think we need to be prepared if that’s going to be the case.
The press release for Monday’s publication of results from the Oxford vaccine trials described an increased frequency of “minor side effects” among participants. A look at the actual paper, though, reveals this to be a marketing spin that has since been parroted in media reports. (The phrases “minor side effects” or “only minor side effects” appeared in writeups from The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and Reuters, among other outlets.) Yes, mild reactions were far more common than worse ones. But moderate or severe harms—defined as being bad enough to interfere with daily life or needing medical care—were common too. Around one-third of people vaccinated with the Covid-19 vaccine without acetaminophen experienced moderate or severe chills, fatigue, headache, malaise, and/or feverishness. Close to 10 percent had a fever of at least 100.4 degrees, and just over one-fourth developed moderate or severe muscle aches. That’s a lot, in a young and healthy group of people—and the acetaminophen didn’t help much for most of those problems. The paper’s authors designated the vaccine as “acceptable” and “tolerated,” but we don’t yet know how acceptable this will be to most people. If journalists don’t start asking tougher questions, this will become the perfect setup for anti-vaccine messaging: Here’s what they forgot to tell you about the risks …
There is another red flag. Clinical trials for other Covid-19 vaccines have placebo groups, where participants receive saline injections. Only one of the Oxford vaccine trials is taking this approach, however; the others instead compare the experimental treatment to an injected meningococcal vaccine. There can be good reasons to do this: Non-placebo injections may mimic telltale signs that you’ve received an active vaccine, such as a skin reaction, making the trial more truly “blind.” But their use also opens the door to doubt-sowing claims that any harms of the new vaccine are getting buried among the harms already caused by the control-group, “old” vaccines.
Coverage of the Moderna vaccine reflects a different kind of pharma spin: the drip-feeding of selective data via press release. On May 18, Moderna put out some patchy, positive findings on interim outcomes from their first-in-human trial. The company followed that up with a stock offering—and company executives sold off nearly $30 million in shares into the feeding frenzy their press release created.
With last week’s paper from Moderna, results from that same group of people finally had their formal publication. At the same time, the group registered a 30,000-person phase III clinical trial, specifying a pair of 100-microgram injections of the Covid-19 vaccine. According to the press release from May, there were no serious adverse events for the people in that particular dosage group. But last week’s paper shows the full results: By the time they’d had two doses, every single one was showing signs of headaches, chills, or fatigue, and for at least 80 percent, this could have been enough to interfere with their normal activities. A participant who had a severe reaction to a particularly high dose has talked in detail about how bad it was: If reactions even half as bad as this were to be common for some of these vaccines, they will be hard sells once they reach the community—and there could be a lot of people who are reluctant to get the second injection.
There is already a high level of misinformation and distrust about fast-tracked Covid-19 vaccines in the American community. This week, a new preprint from Kin On Kwok and colleagues found that even a sizable proportion of nurses in Hong Kong would be hesitant to take one. We may have a vaccine soon, say the authors of that paper, but “communities are not ready to accept it.” It won’t help to overcome this skepticism if notable evidence of harms keeps getting pushed off to the side. It’s much better to be straight up about what it’s really like to take one of these vaccines. Why would anyone trust the experts otherwise?


australiannationalreview--2020-08-03--NYT: Bill Gates repeatedly met with Jeffrey Epstein

A new report is shedding light on a surprising relationship between the late Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates .
New @ @ @ @ @ joins Stephanie Ruhle with reporting on their meetings and to discuss his new book , @ @ @ @ @ , the FBI , and the Rule of Law .
”

URGENT: JUST 7 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...


australiannationalreview--2020-08-03--Urgent Information on Covid Vaccine – Dr. Carrie Madej

Vaccine Information on COVID-19 , Nanotechnology , Smart phone health apps , rDNA , rRNA , patenting GMO .
https : //www.theverge.com/2019/7/16/20697123/elon-musk-neuralink-brain-reading-thread-robot https : //vaccine.guide/ https : //www.sciencealert.com/an-invisible-quantum-dot-tattoo-is-being-suggested-to-id-vaccinated-kids https : //www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf https : //www.ageofautism.com/2016/06/wheres-the-outrage-vaccines-and-aborted-fetal-tissue.html https : //healthimpactnews.com/2020/bill-gates-outspends-u-s-government-and-provides-18-billion-to-who-for-covid-vaccines/ Recombinant DNA ( rDNA ) molecules are DNA molecules formed by laboratory methods of genetic recombination ( such as molecular cloning ) to bring together genetic material from multiple sources , creating sequences that would not otherwise be found in the genome .
Immortalized cells ( also called continuous cells or cell lines ) are primary cells whose telomeres and/or tumour suppressor genes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( e.g .
p53 and Rb ) are important for signalling the cell to stop dividing when the likelihood of DNA damage is higher ( i.e .
after multiple cell cycles , read more about the cell cycle on our knowledge base ) .
In the case of immortalized cells , these genes have been knocked down or their function inhibited so that the cell is able to keep dividing indefinitely .
NVIC.org information on vaccines .
https : //www.corvelva.it/en/component/tags/tag/rapporto-vaccini.html Site for Italian report on vaccines https : //www.youtube.com/watch ?
v=hTTlT7CWRLQ hydrogel nanobots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on hydrogel biosensors https : //ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/testing/genepatents Discusses law of naturally occurring genes can not be patented ; however , synthetic/Modified genes can be patented Video : https : //www.youtube.com/watch ?
v=PbJq2KfgOEs A post shared by The TRUTH will set you Free ( @ exposing_the_truth2day ) on


australiannationalreview--2020-08-03--Tucker Carlson: New York Times Is Planning On Revealing Where My Family Lives To ‘Injure My Wife And

Tucker Carlson : New York Times Is Planning On Revealing Where My Family Lives To ‘ Injure My Wife And Kids ’ .
Fox News host Tucker Carlson revealed on Monday night that The New York Times is planning to publish a report on where his family lives after they had to move due to an attack on their home by Antifa and due to repeated death threats that they have received .
One more thing before we go tonight .
Since this show began almost four years ago , I ’ ve really tried not to talk about myself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first-person pronoun .
The last thing this country needs is more narcissism .
It ’ s not very interesting anyway .
People who use the word “ I ” a lot tend to bore everyone but themselves but tonight were going to make an exception to that rule .
We don ’ t have much choice .
Last week The New York Times began working on a story about where my family and I live .
As a matter of journalism there is no conceivable justification for a story like that .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done anything wrong and we haven ’ t .
We pay our taxes .
We like our neighbors .
We ’ ve never had a dispute with anyone .
So why is The New York Times doing a story on the location of my family ’ s house ?
Well , you know why .
To hurt us , to injure my wife and kids so that I will shut up and stop disagreeing with them .
They believe in force .
We ’ ve learned that .
Two years ago , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washington .
A group of screaming antifa lunatics showed up while I was at work .
They vandalized our home .
They threatened my wife .
She called 911 while hiding in a closet .
A few weeks later they showed up again at our house .
For the next year , they sent letters to our home threatening to kill us .
We tried to ignore it and felt cowardly to sell our home and leave .
We raised our kids there in the neighborhood and we loved it .
But in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did .
We have four children .
It just wasn ’ t worth it .
But The New York Times followed us .
The paper has assigned a political activist called Murray Carpenter to write a story about where we are now .
They ’ ve hired a photographer called Tristan Spinski to take pictures .
Their story about where we live is slated to run the paper this week .
Editors there know exactly what will happen to my family when it does run .
I called them today and I told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care .
They hate my politics .
They want they show off the air .
If one of my children gets hurt because of a story they wrote , they won ’ t considered it collateral damage , they know it ’ s the whole point of the exercise : To inflict pain on our family , to terrorize us , to control what we say .
That ’ s the kind of people they are .
They ’ ll deny this of course , they ’ ll say it ’ s just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
So , how would Murray Carpenter and his photographer Tristan Spinski feel if we told you where they live , if we put pictures of their homes on the air ?
What if we publicized the home address of everyone of the soulless robot editors at The New York Times who assigned and manage this incitement to violence against my family ?
What about the media editor , Jim Windolf ?
We could do that .
We know who they are .
Would that qualify as journalism ?
We doubt they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ d call it criminal behavior if we did it and that tells you everything .

Tucker Carlson: New York Times Is Planning On Revealing Where My Family Lives To ‘Injure My Wife And Kids’.
By Daily Wire News
Fox News host Tucker Carlson revealed on Monday night that The New York Times is planning to publish a report on where his family lives after they had to move due to an attack on their home by Antifa and due to repeated death threats that they have received.
One more thing before we go tonight. Since this show began almost four years ago, I’ve really tried not to talk about myself on the air or even use the first-person pronoun. The last thing this country needs is more narcissism. It’s not very interesting anyway.
People who use the word “I” a lot tend to bore everyone but themselves but tonight were going to make an exception to that rule. We don’t have much choice. Last week The New York Times began working on a story about where my family and I live. As a matter of journalism there is no conceivable justification for a story like that. The paper is not alleging we’ve done anything wrong and we haven’t. We pay our taxes. We like our neighbors. We’ve never had a dispute with anyone.
So why is The New York Times doing a story on the location of my family’s house? Well, you know why. To hurt us, to injure my wife and kids so that I will shut up and stop disagreeing with them. They believe in force. We’ve learned that. Two years ago, a left-wing journalist publicized our home address in Washington. A group of screaming antifa lunatics showed up while I was at work. They vandalized our home. They threatened my wife. She called 911 while hiding in a closet. A few weeks later they showed up again at our house. For the next year, they sent letters to our home threatening to kill us. We tried to ignore it and felt cowardly to sell our home and leave. We raised our kids there in the neighborhood and we loved it. But in the end that’s what we did. We have four children. It just wasn’t worth it.
But The New York Times followed us. The paper has assigned a political activist called Murray Carpenter to write a story about where we are now. They’ve hired a photographer called Tristan Spinski to take pictures. Their story about where we live is slated to run the paper this week. Editors there know exactly what will happen to my family when it does run. I called them today and I told them. But they didn’t care. They hate my politics. They want they show off the air. If one of my children gets hurt because of a story they wrote, they won’t considered it collateral damage, they know it’s the whole point of the exercise: To inflict pain on our family, to terrorize us, to control what we say. That’s the kind of people they are.
They’ll deny this of course, they’ll say it’s just journalism, just the facts. Really? So, how would Murray Carpenter and his photographer Tristan Spinski feel if we told you where they live, if we put pictures of their homes on the air? What if we publicized the home address of everyone of the soulless robot editors at The New York Times who assigned and manage this incitement to violence against my family? What about the media editor, Jim Windolf? We could do that. We know who they are. Would that qualify as journalism? We doubt they’d consider it journalism. They’d call it criminal behavior if we did it and that tells you everything.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-03--Coronavirus is getting weaker, could disappear without vaccine, doctor suggests

Coronavirus is getting weaker , could disappear without vaccine , doctor suggests .
( WHDH ) — The coronavirus has weakened due to possible genetic mutations and it could disappear on its own without a vaccine , according to one doctor who specializes in critical care .
Since the height of the pandemic , the virus has downgraded from a “ tiger to a wild cat ” and people who were once dying are now recovering , Professor Matteo Bassetti , head of the infectious diseases ’ clinic at Policlinico San Martino Hospital in Italy told The Telegraph .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ March and April but now it ’ s like a wild cat .
Even elderly patients , aged 80 or 90 , are now sitting up in bed , and they are breathing without help , ” Bassetti said in an interview with the news outlet .
“ The same patients would have died in two or three days before.
” Bassetti also noted that there is a real chance that the disease goes away on its own .
“ We have fewer and fewer people infected and it could end up with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
Bassetti also explained that he believes the virus is getting weaker because it has mutated in response to people staying at home , wearing masks , and socially distancing themselves from others .
“ I think the virus has mutated because our immune system reacts to the virus , and we have a lower viral load now due to the lockdown , ” he said .
But Dr. Bharat Pankhania , a senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter Medical School , disagreed with Bassetti ’ s claims , saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its own is “ optimistic in the short term.
” “ I don ’ t expect it to die out that quickly , ” Pankhania told the Telegraph .
Italy has recorded 238,720 coronavirus cases and 34,667 deaths since the beginning of the pandemic .
The United States has reported 2,366,688 cases and 122,334 deaths .

Coronavirus is getting weaker, could disappear without vaccine, doctor suggests.
By Frank O’Laughlin
(WHDH) — The coronavirus has weakened due to possible genetic mutations and it could disappear on its own without a vaccine, according to one doctor who specializes in critical care.
Since the height of the pandemic, the virus has downgraded from a “tiger to a wild cat” and people who were once dying are now recovering, Professor Matteo Bassetti, head of the infectious diseases’ clinic at Policlinico San Martino Hospital in Italy told The Telegraph.
“It was like an aggressive tiger in March and April but now it’s like a wild cat. Even elderly patients, aged 80 or 90, are now sitting up in bed, and they are breathing without help,” Bassetti said in an interview with the news outlet. “The same patients would have died in two or three days before.”
Bassetti also noted that there is a real chance that the disease goes away on its own.
“We have fewer and fewer people infected and it could end up with the virus dying out,” Bassetti said.
Bassetti also explained that he believes the virus is getting weaker because it has mutated in response to people staying at home, wearing masks, and socially distancing themselves from others.
“I think the virus has mutated because our immune system reacts to the virus, and we have a lower viral load now due to the lockdown,” he said.
But Dr. Bharat Pankhania, a senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter Medical School, disagreed with Bassetti’s claims, saying the idea that COVID could vanish on its own is “optimistic in the short term.”
“I don’t expect it to die out that quickly,” Pankhania told the Telegraph.
Italy has recorded 238,720 coronavirus cases and 34,667 deaths since the beginning of the pandemic. The United States has reported 2,366,688 cases and 122,334 deaths.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-03--They Tried To Warn Us (Lost Video From 1984)

They Tried To Warn Us ( Lost Video From 1984 ) .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--CDC director acknowledges hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield agreed that some hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths as they do deaths for other diseases .
“ I think you ’ re correct in that we ’ ve seen this in other disease processes , too .
Really , in the HIV epidemic , somebody may have a heart attack but also have HIV — the hospital would prefer the [ classification ] for HIV because there ’ s greater reimbursement , ” Redfield during a House panel hearing Friday when asked by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continued : “ So , I do think there ’ s some reality to that .
When it comes to death reporting , though , ultimately , it ’ s how the physician defines it in the death certificate , and … we review all of those death certificates .
So I think , probably it is less operable in the cause of death , although I won ’ t say there are not some cases .
I do think though [ that ] when it comes to hospital reimbursement issues or individuals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some play in that for sure.
” Questions have been raised about coronavirus counting in hospitals across the country , and conflicting conclusions have been raised about whether or not deaths are being accurately counted .
A Yale study concluded that the overall coronavirus death toll in the United States is a “ substantial undercount ” of the actual number ; White House coronavirus response team member Dr. Deborah Birx suggested in May that deaths are being overcounted by 25 % .
There appear to be cases where the opposite has happened .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths were wrongly attributed to the virus , including the case of a man who died from a gunshot wound to the head .
The CDC ’ s website lists over 3,700 coronavirus deaths characterized as “ intentional and unintentional injury , poisoning and other adverse events.
” In Texas , more than 3,000 people were recently removed from the overall coronavirus count because they were never actually tested but considered “ probable ” cases .

CDC director acknowledges hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths.
By Andrew Mark Miller, Social Media Producer
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield agreed that some hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths as they do deaths for other diseases.
“I think you’re correct in that we’ve seen this in other disease processes, too. Really, in the HIV epidemic, somebody may have a heart attack but also have HIV — the hospital would prefer the [classification] for HIV because there’s greater reimbursement,” Redfield said during a House panel hearing Friday when asked by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer about potential “perverse incentives.”
Redfield continued: “So, I do think there’s some reality to that. When it comes to death reporting, though, ultimately, it’s how the physician defines it in the death certificate, and … we review all of those death certificates. So I think, probably it is less operable in the cause of death, although I won’t say there are not some cases. I do think though [that] when it comes to hospital reimbursement issues or individuals that get discharged, there could be some play in that for sure.”
Questions have been raised about coronavirus counting in hospitals across the country, and conflicting conclusions have been raised about whether or not deaths are being accurately counted.
A Yale study concluded that the overall coronavirus death toll in the United States is a “substantial undercount” of the actual number; White House coronavirus response team member Dr. Deborah Birx suggested in May that deaths are being overcounted by 25%.
There appear to be cases where the opposite has happened. An investigation in Florida found that several deaths were wrongly attributed to the virus, including the case of a man who died from a gunshot wound to the head.
The CDC’s website lists over 3,700 coronavirus deaths characterized as “intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events.” In Texas, more than 3,000 people were recently removed from the overall coronavirus count because they were never actually tested but considered “probable” cases.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Dr. Fauci’s Double Standards Have Polarized the Nation on Hydroxychloroquine

Dr. Fauci ’ s Double Standards Have Polarized the Nation on Hydroxychloroquine .
I don ’ t know if chloroquine ( HCQ ) is effective against COVID-19 .
It ’ s disturbing that I , like many other Americans feel that we won ’ t learn the truth from Dr Fauci .
A 2005 Virology Journal article by MJ Vincent & CDC ’ s Eric Bergeron et al.
, surfaced this week .
The study concludes : “ We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-Coronavirus infection of primate cells .
These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or after exposure to the virus , suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.
” This conclusion implies that chloroquine functions both as a preventative “ vaccine ” and as a cure for strains of coronavirus .
If these results persist in human models in COVID-19 , as last week ’ s Michigan hospital study and abundant evidence from US doctors and other nations suggest—HCQ might compete with Dr Fauci ’ s vaccines including the Moderna vaccine for which his agency owns half the patent and Dr Fauci has invested $ 500 million in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s patents are long expired ; pills cost 30¢ .
Dr Fauci insists he will not approve HCQ for COVID-19 until its efficacy is proven in “ randomized , double-blind placebo studies.
” To date , Dr Fauci has never advocated such studies for any of the 72 vaccine doses added to the mandatory childhood schedule since he took over NIAID in 1984 .
Nor is he requiring them for the COVID-19 vaccines currently racing for approval .
Why should chloroquine be the only remedy required to cross this high hurdle ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ placebo studies than any of these vaccines since its safety is well established after 60 years of use & decades on WHO ’ s listed of “ essential medicines.
” Fauci , Gates , WHO & Pharma have fueled public suspicions by funding multiple studies of HCQ using protocols transparently calculated to discredit the drug .
FDA condemned HCQ for COVID-19 based on two studies in NEJM & Lancet even after the journals retracted them for fraud .
Dr Fauci ’ s peculiar hostility towards HCQ is consistent with his half century bias @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fauci ’ s double standards create confusion , mistrust & polarization .

Dr. Fauci’s Double Standards Have Polarized the Nation on Hydroxychloroquine.
By Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
I don’t know if chloroquine (HCQ) is effective against COVID-19. It’s disturbing that I, like many other Americans feel that we won’t learn the truth from Dr Fauci. A 2005 Virology Journal article by MJ Vincent & CDC’s Eric Bergeron et al., surfaced this week. The study concludes: “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-Coronavirus infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.” This conclusion implies that chloroquine functions both as a preventative “vaccine” and as a cure for strains of coronavirus. If these results persist in human models in COVID-19, as last week’s Michigan hospital study and abundant evidence from US doctors and other nations suggest—HCQ might compete with Dr Fauci’s vaccines including the Moderna vaccine for which his agency owns half the patent and Dr Fauci has invested $500 million in taxpayer dollars. Worse yet—for vaccine makers—HCQ’s patents are long expired; pills cost 30¢. Dr Fauci insists he will not approve HCQ for COVID-19 until its efficacy is proven in “randomized, double-blind placebo studies.” To date, Dr Fauci has never advocated such studies for any of the 72 vaccine doses added to the mandatory childhood schedule since he took over NIAID in 1984. Nor is he requiring them for the COVID-19 vaccines currently racing for approval. Why should chloroquine be the only remedy required to cross this high hurdle? HCQ is less in need of randomized placebo studies than any of these vaccines since its safety is well established after 60 years of use & decades on WHO’s listed of “essential medicines.” Fauci, Gates, WHO & Pharma have fueled public suspicions by funding multiple studies of HCQ using protocols transparently calculated to discredit the drug. FDA condemned HCQ for COVID-19 based on two studies in NEJM & Lancet even after the journals retracted them for fraud. Dr Fauci’s peculiar hostility towards HCQ is consistent with his half century bias favoring vaccines and patent medicines. Dr Fauci’s double standards create confusion, mistrust & polarization.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--How to protect health freedoms in challenging times

How to protect health freedoms in challenging times .
As the rates of chronic disease increase , * more and more people are turning to natural therapies as a means of reversing and supporting chronic health conditions .
As conventional medicine fails at identifying and treating the root cause of disease , everyday people have been forced to find their own answers to the health issues they are desperately trying to manage .
Many people are now becoming aware of the devastating effects of toxicity on the human body – ranging from harsh chemicals in everyday household and personal care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chemical fertilisers and an industrialised food system .
On reflection , our removal from the natural world has been swift and all encompassing .
Add to this , the bombardment into our bodies of pharmaceuticals and the ever-increasing vaccination schedule as the only way of achieving health , and people are now questioning this toxic soup that we call life .
Armed with a different view to health , a thirst for further knowledge and with a mission to help others , a movement has been born .
The natural health community is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all backgrounds and experiences who have come together with a common goal – to return to traditional practices , which are wholistic and organic in nature , to heal the body , calm the mind and soothe the soul .
Although this movement is growing exponentially , it is not without its hurdles .
In an ideal world , advocating for a more natural approach to health would be very straight forward – an interconnected structure comprising functional medicine , natural therapies and nutritional education to provide a true ‘ health ’ care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , what we are experiencing is the demonisation of anyone with an alternative view to what public health authorities dictate healthcare to be .
On top of that , many natural therapy modalities are being specifically targeted and claimed as ineffective .
Our community , even though it is growing , is being threatened by the mainstream bodies who benefit financially from people being sick .
It is very clear that our medical freedom of choice is under serious attack , and it has never been a more critical time to stand up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an alternative approach to managing their health .
With the erosion of rights and constant creep towards medical tyranny , the community has come together to form one voice .
A voice for the people who take responsibility for their health and value medical freedom of choice .
A voice for the people who want to see an end to our toxic existence and a future of cleaner , more sustainable living for generations to come .
This voice is called the Informed Medical Options Party ( IMOP ) .
The people have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year ’ s Queensland State Election and IMOP will be their voice .
If you would like to know more about IMOP by viewing the policies , becoming a member or donating to the Queensland campaign , please visit www.imoparty.com It is time for our voice to be heard .

How to protect health freedoms in challenging times.
By Elizabeth Case, Informed Medical Options Party
As the rates of chronic disease increase, * more and more people are turning to natural therapies as a means of reversing and supporting chronic health conditions. As conventional medicine fails at identifying and treating the root cause of disease, everyday people have been forced to find their own answers to the health issues they are desperately trying to manage.
Many people are now becoming aware of the devastating effects of toxicity on the human body – ranging from harsh chemicals in everyday household and personal care products to food grown with pesticides and chemical fertilisers and an industrialised food system. On reflection, our removal from the natural world has been swift and all encompassing.
Add to this, the bombardment into our bodies of pharmaceuticals and the ever-increasing vaccination schedule as the only way of achieving health, and people are now questioning this toxic soup that we call life.
Armed with a different view to health, a thirst for further knowledge and with a mission to help others, a movement has been born. The natural health community is now thriving and consists of people from all backgrounds and experiences who have come together with a common goal – to return to traditional practices, which are wholistic and organic in nature, to heal the body, calm the mind and soothe the soul.
Although this movement is growing exponentially, it is not without its hurdles. In an ideal world, advocating for a more natural approach to health would be very straight forward – an interconnected structure comprising functional medicine, natural therapies and nutritional education to provide a true ‘health’ care system in times of need.
However, what we are experiencing is the demonisation of anyone with an alternative view to what public health authorities dictate healthcare to be. On top of that, many natural therapy modalities are being specifically targeted and claimed as ineffective.
Our community, even though it is growing, is being threatened by the mainstream bodies who benefit financially from people being sick. It is very clear that our medical freedom of choice is under serious attack, and it has never been a more critical time to stand up and protect the rights of those seeking an alternative approach to managing their health.
With the erosion of rights and constant creep towards medical tyranny, the community has come together to form one voice. A voice for the people who take responsibility for their health and value medical freedom of choice. A voice for the people who want to see an end to our toxic existence and a future of cleaner, more sustainable living for generations to come.
This voice is called the Informed Medical Options Party (IMOP). The people have decided to take their voice to this year’s Queensland State Election and IMOP will be their voice.
If you would like to know more about IMOP by viewing the policies, becoming a member or donating to the Queensland campaign, please visit www.imoparty.com
It is time for our voice to be heard.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Panicdemic: The true cost of lockdown in SA

Panicdemic : the true cost of lockdown in SA In this CRA webinar , Nick Hudson , co-founder of Pandemics @ @ @ @ @ PANDA ) assesses the human and economic cost of an extended lockdown .
PANDA is @ @ @ @ @ inform an appropriate policy response to the Covid-19 pandemic in South Africa .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Mark Zuckerberg: If someone says hydroxychloroquine is a cure for COVID, we’ll take it down

Mark Zuckerberg : If someone says hydroxychloroquine is a cure for COVID , we ’ ll take it down .
Editor ’ s Note : Facebook accepts over $ 600 million pa from Big Pharmaceutical vaccine makers and thus they financially benefit from supporting vaccine makers suppressing their competitors such as Hyrdoxychloroquine .
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on antitrust law with the CEOs of Amazon , Apple , Facebook , and Google , Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that posts positioning hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus cure will be taken down .
“ We do not want to become @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that would be a bad position for us to be in and not what we should be doing , ” Zuckerberg said .
“ But on specific claims , if someone is going to go out and say that hydroxychloroquine is proven to cure COVID , when in fact it has not been proven to cure COVID , and that that statement could lead people to take a drug that in some cases , some of the data suggests that it might be harmful to people , we think that we should take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zuckerberg and suggested that this is a “ legitimate matter for discussion ” and patients and their doctors should be deciding whether hydroxychloroquine is the right medication : “ There still is a debate on whether it is effective on either on treating or preventing COVID-19 and I think this is a legitimate matter of discussion and it would be up to a patient and their doctor to determine whether hydroxychloroquine was the correct medication , you know , given the circumstances.
” But Zuckerberg insisted that Facebook would be making the final @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opinion on the matter , and that his company ’ s position is : “ Stating that there is a proven cure for COVID when there is , in fact , none , might encourage someone to go take something that could have some adverse effect so we do take that down.
” Zuckerberg ’ s comments come less than two days after a viral press conference featuring several doctors supporting hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus treatment option was censored by Facebook , YouTube , and Twitter .
Dr. Simone Gold , a board-certified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organizer of the censored press conference , stated that “ there are always opposing views in medicine ” and that treatment options for coronavirus should be debated and spoken about , not censored and silenced .

Mark Zuckerberg: If someone says hydroxychloroquine is a cure for COVID, we’ll take it down.
By Tom Parker
Facebook overrules the opinion of individual doctors.
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on antitrust law with the CEOs of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that posts positioning hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus cure will be taken down.
“We do not want to become the arbiters of truth. I think that would be a bad position for us to be in and not what we should be doing,” Zuckerberg said. “But on specific claims, if someone is going to go out and say that hydroxychloroquine is proven to cure COVID, when in fact it has not been proven to cure COVID, and that that statement could lead people to take a drug that in some cases, some of the data suggests that it might be harmful to people, we think that we should take that down.”
Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner challenged Zuckerberg and suggested that this is a “legitimate matter for discussion” and patients and their doctors should be deciding whether hydroxychloroquine is the right medication:
“There still is a debate on whether it is effective on either on treating or preventing COVID-19 and I think this is a legitimate matter of discussion and it would be up to a patient and their doctor to determine whether hydroxychloroquine was the correct medication, you know, given the circumstances.”
But Zuckerberg insisted that Facebook would be making the final ruling, regardless of some doctors’ opinion on the matter, and that his company’s position is: “Stating that there is a proven cure for COVID when there is, in fact, none, might encourage someone to go take something that could have some adverse effect so we do take that down.”
Zuckerberg’s comments come less than two days after a viral press conference featuring several doctors supporting hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus treatment option was censored by Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.
Dr. Simone Gold, a board-certified physician and attorney who was the lead organizer of the censored press conference, stated that “there are always opposing views in medicine” and that treatment options for coronavirus should be debated and spoken about, not censored and silenced.
Editor’s Note:
Facebook accepts over $600 million pa from Big Pharmaceutical vaccine makers and thus they financially benefit from supporting vaccine makers suppressing their competitors such as Hydroxychloroquine.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--The TRUTH about what happened to Victoria

The TRUTH about what happened to Victoria .
Premier Daniel Andrews has declared Victoria a “ State of Disaster ” @ @ @ @ @ the COVID-19 outbreak .
Declaring a state of disaster gives the Premier even more power @ @ @ @ @ of Emergency restrictions and add more exceedingly harsh rules , including a curfew .
Meanwhile @ @ @ @ @ avoid taking any responsibility for his hotel quarantine debacle that caused this outbreak .

The TRUTH about what happened to Victoria.
By Avi Yemini
Premier Daniel Andrews has declared Victoria a “State of Disaster” as he loses control of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Declaring a state of disaster gives the Premier even more power to enforce his original State of Emergency restrictions and add more exceedingly harsh rules, including a curfew.
Meanwhile, the Premier continues to avoid taking any responsibility for his hotel quarantine debacle that caused this outbreak.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--New Zealand passports most powerful in world post-COVID

New Zealand passports most powerful in world post-COVID .
A new analysis has found New Zealand ’ s passport to be the most valuable in the world , despite COVID-19 putting an end to our travel plans .
The New Zealand passport is now the most valuable travel document in the world , according to a new global ranking .
The new ranking by the Passport Index , which comes amid general travel chaos caused by COVID-19 , puts the Kiwi passport in joint first place alongside Japan , with both passports granting visa free travel or visa on arrival @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Herald reports .
Australia was second on the list , tied with 11 other nations including the United Kingdom , Germany and South Korea .
The Passport Index ’ s power ranking of 200 of the world ’ s passports is similar but different from the Henley Passport Index , which named Japan ’ s passport the world ’ s most powerful in its latest quarterly ranking .
New Zealanders find themselves in possession of the world ’ s most desirable passport at a time when the data is showing a dramatic decrease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Index described the dramatic movements in this year ’ s rankings as a “ collapse of global mobility ” , with the pandemic upsetting a half decade-long trend of annual increase of increased mobility for all passport holders .
Visa-free travel which had been increasing at an average of 4.55 per cent a year has been wiped out in a matter of months .
The report on mobility during the COVID-19 crisis published to passportindex.com shows that the ability of travellers to access other countries contracted dramatically – World Openness Score ( WOS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end of 2019 .
The Passport Index said the new data showed the “ staggering reality of global mobility during a pandemic ” .
Although overall passport mobility has softened , countries within an area of common movement such as the EU have kept some standing in the passport power rankings .
Belgium , Finland , Austria , Luxembourg , Spain , Ireland , United Kingdom and Switzerland all feature in the top 10 power rankings , due to reciprocal access to 26 European Union member states .
Perhaps no passport has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American travel document .
The US passport which previously granted visa-free access to nearly 170 countries has fallen to 21 in the rankings , with just 80 countries not imposing restrictions on American tourists .
It ’ s the second global passport analysis to note the decline in power of the US passport during COVID-19 .
The country ’ s disastrous response to the pandemic has sped up a fall in the power rankings which was already weakening .
At the end of last year , the Passport Index highlighted the Trump administration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which meant that – for the past four years – “ global mobility for its citizens has been largely ignored ” .
Last month , the Henley Passport Index also noted the extraordinary decline in power of the US passport due to travel bans and widespread criticisms of US President Donald Trump ’ s virus response .
The United Arab Emirates , which has invested heavily in becoming a global travel hub and foreign diplomacy , saw its passport become the quickest climbing passport of the last decade – gaining access to 110 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ softening of power and decrease in international travel due to the pandemic has seen it slump to rank 16 , with visa-free access to 95 countries .

New Zealand passports most powerful in world post-COVID.
By news.com.au
A new analysis has found New Zealand’s passport to be the most valuable in the world, despite COVID-19 putting an end to our travel plans.
The New Zealand passport is now the most valuable travel document in the world, according to a new global ranking.
The new ranking by the Passport Index, which comes amid general travel chaos caused by COVID-19, puts the Kiwi passport in joint first place alongside Japan, with both passports granting visa free travel or visa on arrival to 118 countries, The New Zealand Herald reports.
Australia was second on the list, tied with 11 other nations including the United Kingdom, Germany and South Korea.
The Passport Index’s power ranking of 200 of the world’s passports is similar but different from the Henley Passport Index, which named Japan’s passport the world’s most powerful in its latest quarterly ranking.
New Zealanders find themselves in possession of the world’s most desirable passport at a time when the data is showing a dramatic decrease of mobility and travel.
The Passport Index described the dramatic movements in this year’s rankings as a “collapse of global mobility”, with the pandemic upsetting a half decade-long trend of annual increase of increased mobility for all passport holders.
Visa-free travel which had been increasing at an average of 4.55 per cent a year has been wiped out in a matter of months. The report on mobility during the COVID-19 crisis published to passportindex.com shows that the ability of travellers to access other countries contracted dramatically – World Openness Score (WOS) falling by 65 per cent since the end of 2019.
The Passport Index said the new data showed the “staggering reality of global mobility during a pandemic”.
Although overall passport mobility has softened, countries within an area of common movement such as the EU have kept some standing in the passport power rankings.
Belgium, Finland, Austria, Luxembourg, Spain, Ireland, United Kingdom and Switzerland all feature in the top 10 power rankings, due to reciprocal access to 26 European Union member states.
Perhaps no passport has fallen from grace so quickly as the American travel document.
The US passport which previously granted visa-free access to nearly 170 countries has fallen to 21 in the rankings, with just 80 countries not imposing restrictions on American tourists.
It’s the second global passport analysis to note the decline in power of the US passport during COVID-19.
The country’s disastrous response to the pandemic has sped up a fall in the power rankings which was already weakening. At the end of last year, the Passport Index highlighted the Trump administration’s difficult stance on foreign diplomacy which meant that – for the past four years – “global mobility for its citizens has been largely ignored”.
Last month, the Henley Passport Index also noted the extraordinary decline in power of the US passport due to travel bans and widespread criticisms of US President Donald Trump’s virus response.
The United Arab Emirates, which has invested heavily in becoming a global travel hub and foreign diplomacy, saw its passport become the quickest climbing passport of the last decade – gaining access to 110 countries visa-free.
However, a general softening of power and decrease in international travel due to the pandemic has seen it slump to rank 16, with visa-free access to 95 countries.
POST-PANDEMIC PASSPORT INDEX
1. Japan, New Zealand
2. Belgium, France, Germany, Finland, Austria, Luxembourg, Spain, South Korea, Switzerland, Ireland, United Kingdom, Australia
3. Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, Italy, Norway, Canada
4. Malta, Portugal, Greece, Lithuania, Iceland
5. Czech Republic, Slovenia, Estonia, Poland, Latvia, Hungary, Liechtenstein
6. Slovakia
7. Croatia, Monaco
8. Cyprus, Romania, Bulgaria
9. San Marino
10. Andorra


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Bill Gates REFUSES to reveal why he flew on Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein four years AFTER his

Bill Gates REFUSES to reveal why he flew on Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein four years AFTER his release from prison while the billionaire was still chairman of Microsoft .
Editor ’ s Note : Bill Gates has flown at least 6 times on Epsteins Jet , according to a New York Times most likely more times , yet he continues to lie about it .
Why ?
And why does Bill Gates spend approximately $ 1 billion pa paying media and journalist to write favourably about him and his suspect vaccine agendas .
• Bill Gates and his spokespeople @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach on March 1 , 2013 with Jeffrey Epstein • Epstein told people in the past that he was a financial adviser to Gates , who was still the chairman of Microsoft at the time • A rep for Gates ’ humanitarian foundation denied that Epstein ever worked for billionaire founder of Microsoft , but would not comment on the 2013 flight • Gates ’ spokesperson also stated that there were no financial or charitable ties between the two men • Epstein had just been released @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guilty to two counts of soliciting a minor under the age of 18 for sex Bill Gates is hoping to ride out the storm , one week after it was revealed he had hitched a ride on Jeffrey Epstein ’ s plane .
The billionaire was the chairman of Microsoft at the time he traveled with Epstein on the Lolita Express in 2013 , four years after the pedophile served time for soliciting a minor under the age of 18 for sex .
Flight records reveal that Gates flew with Epstein from Teterboro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on March 1 , 2013 , one of the few flights that year where pilot Larry Viskoski recorded the name of a passenger .
A representative for Gates has not responded to requests for comment , beyond claiming that the once-richest man in the world never had any financial or charitable ties to Epstein .
The pairing is an odd one given the work Melinda Gates and the couple ’ s foundation does for young women around the world .
And it is known that the two had spent time together previously , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which each year welcomes billionaires from around the world to come together and discuss advancements they are working in on the worlds of math , science and technology .
Humanitarian and human trafficker : Bill Gates ( left ) flew from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach on March 1 , 2013 with Jeffrey Epstein ( right ) In fact , the 2013 dinner took place just two nights before they flew to Florida , though neither of the men are pictured attending that year ’ s event .
Epstein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adviser to Gates for some time , but that claim was later shot down by the Microsoft founder ’ s representative .
The two men do however both own property in southern Florida , where Epstein had two homes including a $ 12 million Palm Beach mansion and Gates owns a five-property compound in Wellington that he purchased for a total of $ 40 million .
In a biography that was published on the website for Edge , but later deleted , it is noted that Epstein ‘ founded the Jeffrey Epstein VI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cutting edge science around the world.
’ He is also said to be ‘ one of the largest supporters of individual scientists , including theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking and Nobel Laureates Gerard ‘ t Hooft , David Gross and Frank Wilczek.
’ In an alarming addition , the biography then states that Epstein has taken ‘ an active role in supporting education across the United States as well as philanthropy in the US Virgin Islands , where the foundation is based.
’ He traveled to the 2002 dinner with guests including architect David @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Richard Cook , and literary agent John Brockman – who was also the editor of the Edge website .
Gates was not the only famous name to hop aboard Epstein ’ s plane either , with the serial pedophile also welcoming famed newsman Walter Cronkite , architect Peter Marino and a passenger identified as John Roberts .
Roberts flew with Epstein on at least two occasions according to flight records , from March 22 , 2010 and February 10 , 2011 .
In 2010 the plane with Roberts traveled from Palm Beach to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Palm Beach to Teterboro .
This in addition to the already noted famous guests such as Bill Clinton , Naomi Campbell , Kevin Spacey , Chris Tucker and Prince Andrew .
Two of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s ‘ sex slaves ’ claim that they engaged in sexual acts with Prince Andrew – one of whom was underage at the time .
Virginia Roberts , whose defamation case against Epstein ’ s alleged madame Ghislaine Maxwell is the source of these unsealed documents , provides a photo of herself with Prince Andrew and Maxwell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in one court filing .
She was 17 at the time the photo was taken of the three .
The documents were released earlier this month , just moments after the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the decision to make public over 2,000 pages of court filings that had previously been under seal .
Those documents reveal in great detail the three-year period in which Roberts claims she was Epstein and Maxwell ’ s ‘ sex slave.
’ ‘ One of the individuals Ms. Giuffre was trafficked to was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Defendant ’ s own townhouse in London , ’ states the filing , which was in response to a Motion to Dismiss from Maxwell ’ s attorneys .
‘ There exist flight logs evidencing Ms. Giuffre flying to London alongside Defendant and Epstein on Epstein ’ s private plane , and a photo of Ms. Giuffre , Defendant , and the Prince , without Defendant ever offering a legal reasonable explanation for that photo being taken , or for traveling with a 17 year old girl overseas.
’ The other female , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ groped her and Roberts in 2001 while the group was at Epstein ’ s townhouse , in a deposition that was released with the unsealed court documents .
Sjoberg , who was 21 at the time , claims there were multiple eyewitnesses to the incident .
‘ I just remember someone suggesting a photo , and they told us to go get on the couch .
And so Andrew and Virginia sat on the couch , and they put the puppet , the puppet on her lap , ’ said Sjoberg in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sat on Andrew ’ s lap , and I believe on my own volition , and they took the puppet ’ s hands and put it on Virginia ’ s breast , and so Andrew put his on mine.
’ Roberts ’ attorneys meanwhile used the photo of the teenager with Prince Andrew and Maxwell to point out that the defendant in that case never explained how they came to be alone in her London townhouse with a teenager from Florida .
‘ Defendant never offered an explanation regarding Ms. Giuffre ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Epstein .
She never offered a legal explanation for why Prince Andrew was photographed with his hand around Ms. Giuffre ’ s bare waist while she was a minor child , while posing with Defendant , inside Defendant ’ s house in London , reads the filing submitted by Roberts ’ attorneys .
‘ This particular photograph corroborates Ms. Giuffre ’ s claims , and there is no other reasonable explanation why an American child should be in the company of adults not her kin , in the London house owned by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ Prince Andrew has always denied any wrongdoing and in a 2015 court application , a judge threw out Robert ’ s allegations that she had sex with Prince Andrew and ordered them to be struck from the record as being ‘ immaterial and impertinent.
’ Buckingham Palace also issued on the record statements in January 2015 , stating : ‘ Any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.
’ That statement went on to note : ‘ It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The allegations made are false and without any foundation.
’ Roberts also revealed two men who did not engage in any sexual acts with Epstein ’ s victims in her own deposition that was unsealed on Friday – Bill Clinton and Donald Trump .
Roberts said in a 2016 deposition that Trump ‘ didn ’ t partake in any sex with us … and never flirted with me ’ .
She also stated that despite Epstein talking about how the two were friends , she did not recall ever seeing him at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ however confirm that ‘ Donald Trump was also a good friend of Jeffrey ’ s. ’ A lawyer for Maxwell then asked : ‘ What is the basis for your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey ’ s ’ Roberts responded : ‘ Jeffrey told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.
’ She then followed up by asking if Roberts had ever seen the two together , at which point she stated that she had never seen the two men interact during her time with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ boss prior to the three years that she was allegedly trafficked by Epstein around the globe .
She has stated in court papers and multiple interviews that Maxwell recruited her while she was working at Mar-a-Lago .
Other famous friends that Roberts said she had met included Heidi Klum and Naomi Campbell , in addition to Al Gore .
That deposition also detailed the ‘ sexual training ’ that Roberts allegedly received from Epstein and Maxwell , which lasted somewhere between four and six months .
After that was complete , Epstein began @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she said .
Roberts has spoken publicly about her time with Epstein on a few occasions , and stated that by 18 she was deemed to old for the pedophile .
A short while later she managed to escape , after allegedly being sent to Thailand for her 19th birthday to take a massage course – and told she would be taking back an underage girl .
Roberts was allegedly to interview the minor with the goal of taking her back to the United States , but that all changed when she met @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the two went off to start a new life in Australia , where they are now raising their three children .
She has since devoted her time to combating sex trafficking and the sexual abuse of minors .

Bill Gates REFUSES to reveal why he flew on Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein four years AFTER his release from prison while the billionaire was still chairman of Microsoft.
By CHRIS SPARGO
Bill Gates and his spokespeople refuse to explain why he flew from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach on March 1, 2013 with Jeffrey Epstein
Epstein told people in the past that he was a financial adviser to Gates, who was still the chairman of Microsoft at the time
A rep for Gates’ humanitarian foundation denied that Epstein ever worked for billionaire founder of Microsoft, but would not comment on the 2013 flight
Gates’ spokesperson also stated that there were no financial or charitable ties between the two men
Epstein had just been released from prison four years prior after pleading guilty to two counts of soliciting a minor under the age of 18 for sex
Bill Gates is hoping to ride out the storm, one week after it was revealed he had hitched a ride on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane.
The billionaire was the chairman of Microsoft at the time he traveled with Epstein on the Lolita Express in 2013, four years after the pedophile served time for soliciting a minor under the age of 18 for sex.
Flight records reveal that Gates flew with Epstein from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach on March 1, 2013, one of the few flights that year where pilot Larry Viskoski recorded the name of a passenger.
A representative for Gates has not responded to requests for comment, beyond claiming that the once-richest man in the world never had any financial or charitable ties to Epstein.
The pairing is an odd one given the work Melinda Gates and the couple’s foundation does for young women around the world.
And it is known that the two had spent time together previously, most notably at the annual Edge Dinner, which each year welcomes billionaires from around the world to come together and discuss advancements they are working in on the worlds of math, science and technology.
Humanitarian and human trafficker: Bill Gates (left) flew from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach on March 1, 2013 with Jeffrey Epstein (right)
Flight records: Epstein, who was found dead in his jail cell, had told people in the past that he was a financial adviser to Gates (flight data above)
In fact, the 2013 dinner took place just two nights before they flew to Florida, though neither of the men are pictured attending that year’s event.
Epstein did claim he worked as a financial adviser to Gates for some time, but that claim was later shot down by the Microsoft founder’s representative.
The two men do however both own property in southern Florida, where Epstein had two homes including a $12 million Palm Beach mansion and Gates owns a five-property compound in Wellington that he purchased for a total of $40 million.
In a biography that was published on the website for Edge, but later deleted, it is noted that Epstein ‘founded the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation in 2000 to fund and support cutting edge science around the world.’
He is also said to be ‘one of the largest supporters of individual scientists, including theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking and Nobel Laureates Gerard ‘t Hooft, David Gross and Frank Wilczek.’
In an alarming addition, the biography then states that Epstein has taken ‘an active role in supporting education across the United States as well as philanthropy in the US Virgin Islands, where the foundation is based.’
He traveled to the 2002 dinner with guests including architect David Rockwell, author Michael Wolff, journalist Richard Cook, and literary agent John Brockman – who was also the editor of the Edge website.
Gates was not the only famous name to hop aboard Epstein’s plane either, with the serial pedophile also welcoming famed newsman Walter Cronkite, architect Peter Marino and a passenger identified as John Roberts.
Roberts flew with Epstein on at least two occasions according to flight records, from March 22, 2010 and February 10, 2011.
In 2010 the plane with Roberts traveled from Palm Beach to Oakland, and the following year from Palm Beach to Teterboro.
This in addition to the already noted famous guests such as Bill Clinton, Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker and Prince Andrew.
Two of Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘sex slaves’ claim that they engaged in sexual acts with Prince Andrew – one of whom was underage at the time.
Virginia Roberts, whose defamation case against Epstein’s alleged madame Ghislaine Maxwell is the source of these unsealed documents, provides a photo of herself with Prince Andrew and Maxwell at the latter’s London home in one court filing.
She was 17 at the time the photo was taken of the three.
The documents were released earlier this month, just moments after the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the decision to make public over 2,000 pages of court filings that had previously been under seal.
Those documents reveal in great detail the three-year period in which Roberts claims she was Epstein and Maxwell’s ‘sex slave.’
‘One of the individuals Ms. Giuffre was trafficked to was Prince Andrew – trafficking that took place in Defendant’s own townhouse in London,’ states the filing, which was in response to a Motion to Dismiss from Maxwell’s attorneys.
‘There exist flight logs evidencing Ms. Giuffre flying to London alongside Defendant and Epstein on Epstein’s private plane, and a photo of Ms. Giuffre, Defendant, and the Prince, without Defendant ever offering a legal reasonable explanation for that photo being taken, or for traveling with a 17 year old girl overseas.’
The other female, Johanna Sjoberg, alleged that Prince Andrew groped her and Roberts in 2001 while the group was at Epstein’s townhouse, in a deposition that was released with the unsealed court documents.
Sjoberg, who was 21 at the time, claims there were multiple eyewitnesses to the incident.
‘I just remember someone suggesting a photo, and they told us to go get on the couch. And so Andrew and Virginia sat on the couch, and they put the puppet, the puppet on her lap,’ said Sjoberg in a deposition.
‘And so then I sat on Andrew’s lap, and I believe on my own volition, and they took the puppet’s hands and put it on Virginia’s breast, and so Andrew put his on mine.’
Roberts’ attorneys meanwhile used the photo of the teenager with Prince Andrew and Maxwell to point out that the defendant in that case never explained how they came to be alone in her London townhouse with a teenager from Florida.
‘Defendant never offered an explanation regarding Ms. Giuffre’s photographs of her, Defendant, and Epstein. She never offered a legal explanation for why Prince Andrew was photographed with his hand around Ms. Giuffre’s bare waist while she was a minor child, while posing with Defendant, inside Defendant’s house in London, reads the filing submitted by Roberts’ attorneys.
‘This particular photograph corroborates Ms. Giuffre’s claims, and there is no other reasonable explanation why an American child should be in the company of adults not her kin, in the London house owned by the girlfriend of a now convicted sex offender.’
Prince Andrew has always denied any wrongdoing and in a 2015 court application, a judge threw out Robert’s allegations that she had sex with Prince Andrew and ordered them to be struck from the record as being ‘immaterial and impertinent.’
Buckingham Palace also issued on the record statements in January 2015, stating: ‘Any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.’
That statement went on to note: ‘It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts. The allegations made are false and without any foundation.’
Roberts also revealed two men who did not engage in any sexual acts with Epstein’s victims in her own deposition that was unsealed on Friday – Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.
Roberts said in a 2016 deposition that Trump ‘didn’t partake in any sex with us … and never flirted with me’.
She also stated that despite Epstein talking about how the two were friends, she did not recall ever seeing him at the Palm Beach mansion.
Robert did however confirm that ‘Donald Trump was also a good friend of Jeffrey’s.’
A lawyer for Maxwell then asked: ‘What is the basis for your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey’s’
Roberts responded: ‘Jeffrey told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.’
She then followed up by asking if Roberts had ever seen the two together, at which point she stated that she had never seen the two men interact during her time with Epstein.
Trump had been Roberts’ boss prior to the three years that she was allegedly trafficked by Epstein around the globe.
She has stated in court papers and multiple interviews that Maxwell recruited her while she was working at Mar-a-Lago.
Other famous friends that Roberts said she had met included Heidi Klum and Naomi Campbell, in addition to Al Gore.
That deposition also detailed the ‘sexual training’ that Roberts allegedly received from Epstein and Maxwell, which lasted somewhere between four and six months.
After that was complete, Epstein began to traffic Roberts to his friends, she said.
Roberts has spoken publicly about her time with Epstein on a few occasions, and stated that by 18 she was deemed to old for the pedophile.
A short while later she managed to escape, after allegedly being sent to Thailand for her 19th birthday to take a massage course – and told she would be taking back an underage girl.
Roberts was allegedly to interview the minor with the goal of taking her back to the United States, but that all changed when she met her now-husband.
She never returned and the two went off to start a new life in Australia, where they are now raising their three children.
She has since devoted her time to combating sex trafficking and the sexual abuse of minors.
Editor’s Note:
Bill Gates has flown at least 6 times on Epsteins Jet, according to a New York Times most likely more times, yet he continues to lie about it. Why?
And why does Bill Gates spend approximately $1 billion pa paying media and journalist to write favourably about him and his suspect vaccine agendas.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: “Pharma has 80 COVID vaccines in development, but Gates & Fauci pushed Moder

Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. : “ Pharma has 80 COVID vaccines in development , but Gates & Fauci pushed Moderna ’ s “ Frankenstein jab ” to the front of the line .
Scientists & ethicists are sounding alarms .
The vaccine uses a new , untested , and very controversial experimental RNA technology that Gates has backed for over a decade .
Instead of injecting an antigen & adjuvant as with traditional vaccines , Moderna plugs a small piece of coronavirus genetic code into human cells , altering DNA throughout the human body and reprograming our cells to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MRNA vaccines are a form of genetic engineering called “ germline gene editing ” .
Moderna ’ s genetic alterations are passed down to future generations .
In January The Geneva Statement the world ’ s leading ethicists and scientists called for an end to this kind of xperimentation .
Moderna has never bought a product to market , preceded through clinical trials , or had a vaccine approved by the FDA .
Despite Gates ’ investments , the company was teetering on bankruptcy with $ 1.5 billion debt before COVID .
Fauci @ @ @ @ @ @ @ astonishing $ 483 million in federal funds to accelerate development .
Dr. Joseph Bolen , Moderna ’ s former R & D Chief , expressed shock at Fauci ’ s bet.
” I don ’ t know what their thinking was ” , he told CNN , “ When I read that , I was pretty amazed ” .
Moderna and Fauci launched federally-funded human trials on March 3rd in Seattle .
Dr. Peter Hotez warns of potentially fatal consequences of skipping animal studies .
“ If there is immune enhancement in animals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Dr. Suhab Siddiqi , Moderna ’ s Ex-Director of Chemistry , told CNN , “ I would not let the [ vaccine ] be injected in my body .
I would demand : Where is the toxicity data ?
” Former NIH Scientist Dr. Judy Mikovits says its criminal to test MRNA vaccines on humans .
“ MRNA can cause cancers and other dire harms that don ’ t surface for years.
” As precautions , Moderna ordered trial participants to avoid unprotected sex or sperm donations & Fauci directed that all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immunity .
Gates hopes to sell his experimental gene-altering technology to all 7 billion humans & transform our species into GMOs .
”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: “Pharma has 80 COVID vaccines in development, but Gates & Fauci pushed Moderna’s “Frankenstein jab” to the front of the line.
By Boris Radley
Scientists & ethicists are sounding alarms. The vaccine uses a new, untested, and very controversial experimental RNA technology that Gates has backed for over a decade. Instead of injecting an antigen & adjuvant as with traditional vaccines, Moderna plugs a small piece of coronavirus genetic code into human cells, altering DNA throughout the human body and reprograming our cells to produce antibodies to fight the virus. MRNA vaccines are a form of genetic engineering called “germline gene editing”. Moderna’s genetic alterations are passed down to future generations.
In January The Geneva Statement the world’s leading ethicists and scientists called for an end to this kind of xperimentation. Moderna has never bought a product to market, preceded through clinical trials, or had a vaccine approved by the FDA. Despite Gates’ investments, the company was teetering on bankruptcy with $1.5 billion debt before COVID.
Fauci’s support won the company an astonishing $483 million in federal funds to accelerate development. Dr. Joseph Bolen, Moderna’s former R&D Chief, expressed shock at Fauci’s bet.” I don’t know what their thinking was”, he told CNN, “When I read that, I was pretty amazed”.
Moderna and Fauci launched federally-funded human trials on March 3rd in Seattle. Dr. Peter Hotez warns of potentially fatal consequences of skipping animal studies. “If there is immune enhancement in animals, that’s a show-stopper”. Dr. Suhab Siddiqi, Moderna’s Ex-Director of Chemistry, told CNN, “I would not let the [vaccine] be injected in my body. I would demand: Where is the toxicity data?”
Former NIH Scientist Dr. Judy Mikovits says its criminal to test MRNA vaccines on humans. “MRNA can cause cancers and other dire harms that don’t surface for years.” As precautions, Moderna ordered trial participants to avoid unprotected sex or sperm donations & Fauci directed that all COVID vaccines to be protected by blanket immunity. Gates hopes to sell his experimental gene-altering technology to all 7 billion humans & transform our species into GMOs.”


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Deaths registered per month (2010-present)

STOP Giving Dan Andrews a HARD TIMES .
Look at how many lives he has saved this year in June @ @ @ @ @ the facts .
In Victoria .
Guys a genius , numbers don ’ t lie @ @ @ @ @ !
!
Oh – only one small , little , tiny problem .
History books @ @ @ @ @ a normal year ( remember those ) no pandemic… opps !
!
!
Most people @ @ @ @ @ bills and economy was open for business , people could travel freely … etc … @ @ @ @ @ Dan keep talking about in press conference and how his not willing to sacrifice one @ @ @ @ @ is there a 34 % reduction in the numbers of deaths in a year when @ @ @ @ @ pandemic in 100 years ?
?
?
You ’ d think that Dan would be @ @ @ @ @ they off this F ’ n Vic gov – website .
Dan – Just go @ @ @ @ @ a favor , Your not cut out to lead .

Deaths registered per month (2010-present).
By Jon Giaan
STOP Giving Dan Andrews a HARD TIMES. Look at how many lives he has saved this year in June alone you idiots
Here are the facts. In Victoria.
2019 – June 4737 deaths.
2020 – June 3126 – deaths.
A massive 34 % REDUCTION.
Guys a genius, numbers don’t lie he should be knighted !!!
Oh – only one small, little, tiny problem. History books show that last years was a normal year (remember those) no pandemic… opps !!!
Most people had jobs, paying their bills and economy was open for business, people could travel freely … etc …
I’m confused. Are you…?
It’s deaths That Dan keep talking about in press conference and how his not willing to sacrifice one more death.
And yet …
So why is there a 34% reduction in the numbers of deaths in a year when we have had the worst pandemic in 100 years ???
You’d think that Dan would be across these numbers … because they off this F’n Vic gov – website.
Dan – Just go brother. Do us all a favor, Your not cut out to lead.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Should we stop giving Dan Andrews the Victorian Premier a hard time?

Should we stop giving Dan Andrews the Victorian Premier a hard time ?
Here are the facts .
In Victoria @ @ @ @ @ numbers don ’ t lie he should be knighted !
!
!
Oh – only @ @ @ @ @ tiny problem .
History books show that last years was a normal year ( remember @ @ @ @ @ !
!
!
Most people had jobs , paying their bills and economy was open @ @ @ @ @ travel freely … etc etc … It ’ s deaths That Dan keep talking about @ @ @ @ @ he ’ s not willing to sacrifice one more death .
So why is there @ @ @ @ @ the numbers of deaths in a year where we have had the worst pandemic in @ @ @ @ @ You ’ d think that Dan would be across these numbers … cause they off @ @ @ @ @ .

Should we stop giving Dan Andrews the Victorian Premier a hard time?
By Staff Reporter
Edited from Victorian citizen Jon Gian
Maybe not
Here are the facts. In Victoria.
2019 – June 4737 deaths.
2020 – June 3126 – deaths.
A massive 51% REDUCTION.
Guys a genius, numbers don’t lie he should be knighted !!!
Oh – only one small, little, tiny problem. History books show that last years was a normal year ( remember those ) no pandemic… oops !!!
Most people had jobs, paying their bills and economy was open for business, people could travel freely … etc etc …
I’m confused. Are you…?
It’s deaths That Dan keep talking about in press conference and how he’s not willing to sacrifice one more death.
And yet …
So why is there a 51 % reduction in the numbers of deaths in a year where we have had the worst pandemic in 100 years???
You’d think that Dan would be across these numbers … cause they off this Vic gov – website.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Schools teaching students that pedophilia is a sexual orientation

Australian National Review ’ s community of readers and following is stronger than ever .
However , advertising revenues across @ @ @ @ @ especially without a paywall .
Will you help us remain a force for good and @ @ @ @ @ government and industry ?
We want to continue on our mission to enforce a free @ @ @ @ @ day and age where mainstream media and big corporations are going all out to suppress @ @ @ @ @ without supporters donations we can ’ t fund ANR .
By supporting The Australian National @ @ @ @ @ can afford , you can help us ensure that everyone is informed of the truth @ @ @ @ @ press for years to come .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-04--Why they BANNED me from The Project

Why they BANNED me from The Project

Why they BANNED me from The Project Last night on The Project in a typical attempt to ridicule Donald Trump @ @ @ @ @ female person of colour , and suddenly , no one seems to care .
In @ @ @ @ @ BLOCKED me for pointing out their sexist-racist behaviour .

Why they BANNED me from The Project
By Avi Yemini
Last night on The Project in a typical attempt to ridicule Donald Trump, the panel mocked a female person of colour, and suddenly, no one seems to care.
In fact, Waleed & Co BLOCKED me for pointing out their sexist-racist behaviour.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-05--#ExposeBillGates explodes on Twitter as conspiracy theorists vow to avoid Covid-19 vaccine connected

# ExposeBillGates explodes on Twitter as conspiracy theorists vow to avoid Covid-19 vaccine connected to billionaire .
Bill Gates ’ omnipresence in the media during the Covid-19 pandemic has turned into a mass obsession with many , and conspiracy theorists got # ExposeBillGates trending on Twitter on a planned “ day of action.
” The coronavirus pandemic created a number of speculations around the Microsoft Founder over his support of extended lockdown measures , his large contributions to the World Health Organization , and past comments on vaccines .
“ The public is finally waking up .
I ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really listen to him talk and watch his interviews you ’ ll know he DOESN ’ T have our best interest in mind , ” author Peter Vooogd tweeted on Saturday .
It was one of the many tweets linked to the # ExposeBillGates hashtag , which itself stemmed from a planned “ day of action ” — announced by author Derrick Broze last month — to expose the billionaire .
Other tweets included a video blasting Gates for his outspokenness on Covid-19 despite not being an elected official , as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world .
Accusations of “ population control ” were also doled out based on Gates ’ work providing vaccines to poorer countries through his foundation .
Others promised to never take any vaccine Gates has involvement with , including conservative author Michelle Malkin .
Some social media users , however , did not take the conspiracy theories seriously and instead used the hashtag to poke fun at Gates .
Some social media users , however , did not take the conspiracy theories seriously and instead used the hashtag to poke fun at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are based more on conjecture than hard evidence , they have caught on with the public .
Media analytics company Zignal Labs reported the conspiracy theory that Gates wants to implant tracking microchips into citizens under the guise of stopping Covid-19 was mentioned on social media more than a million times before May .
Though conspiracy theories about Gates are based more on conjecture than hard evidence , they have caught on with the public .
Media analytics company Zignal Labs reported the conspiracy theory that Gates wants to implant tracking microchips into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was mentioned on social media more than a million times before May .
A Yahoo News/YouGov poll that showed around 20 percent of respondents believe Gates wants to track people ’ s personal information through microchips .
For Republicans , that number in the poll shoots above 40 percent .
Gates denied wanting to implant microchips in citizens and called the poll results “ concerning , ” though he did admit a mass “ data system ” keep track of people ’ s information was a good idea to prevent future pandemics .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ only increased since the pandemic began , which likely feeds many of the conspiracy theorists untrusting of him .
With the US backing out of support for the World Health Organization , he is set to become the group ’ s largest contributor , a fact that worries many as the Microsoft founder is a private citizen who could theoretically carry a lot of power during global situations .

#ExposeBillGates explodes on Twitter as conspiracy theorists vow to avoid Covid-19 vaccine connected to billionaire.
By RT QUESTION MORE
Bill Gates’ omnipresence in the media during the Covid-19 pandemic has turned into a mass obsession with many, and conspiracy theorists got #ExposeBillGates trending on Twitter on a planned “day of action.”
The coronavirus pandemic created a number of speculations around the Microsoft Founder over his support of extended lockdown measures, his large contributions to the World Health Organization, and past comments on vaccines. “The public is finally waking up. I’ve never liked this guy and if you really listen to him talk and watch his interviews you’ll know he DOESN’T have our best interest in mind,” author Peter Vooogd tweeted on Saturday. It was one of the many tweets linked to the #ExposeBillGates hashtag, which itself stemmed from a planned “day of action” — announced by author Derrick Broze last month — to expose the billionaire.
Other tweets included a video blasting Gates for his outspokenness on Covid-19 despite not being an elected official, as well as his support of extending lockdown measures across the world. Accusations of “population control” were also doled out based on Gates’ work providing vaccines to poorer countries through his foundation.
Others promised to never take any vaccine Gates has involvement with, including conservative author Michelle Malkin.
Some social media users, however, did not take the conspiracy theories seriously and instead used the hashtag to poke fun at Gates.
Some social media users, however, did not take the conspiracy theories seriously and instead used the hashtag to poke fun at Gates.
Though conspiracy theories about Gates are based more on conjecture than hard evidence, they have caught on with the public. Media analytics company Zignal Labs reported the conspiracy theory that Gates wants to implant tracking microchips into citizens under the guise of stopping Covid-19 was mentioned on social media more than a million times before May.
Though conspiracy theories about Gates are based more on conjecture than hard evidence, they have caught on with the public. Media analytics company Zignal Labs reported the conspiracy theory that Gates wants to implant tracking microchips into citizens under the guise of stopping Covid-19 was mentioned on social media more than a million times before May.
A Yahoo News/YouGov poll that showed around 20 percent of respondents believe Gates wants to track people’s personal information through microchips. For Republicans, that number in the poll shoots above 40 percent.
Gates denied wanting to implant microchips in citizens and called the poll results “concerning,” though he did admit a mass “data system” keep track of people’s information was a good idea to prevent future pandemics.
Gates’ standing in the world has only increased since the pandemic began, which likely feeds many of the conspiracy theorists untrusting of him. With the US backing out of support for the World Health Organization, he is set to become the group’s largest contributor, a fact that worries many as the Microsoft founder is a private citizen who could theoretically carry a lot of power during global situations.