australiannationalreview--2020-10-08--Australian MP Graig Kelly continues to call for Dan Andrews to leave

Australian MP Graig Kelly continues to call for Dan Andrews to leave .
Pack up your ‘ super-computer ’ and just go .
You ’ ve continued to ignore the advice of hundreds of highly qualified and highly experienced doctors that have warned about the risk of increases in self-harm .
The children need to be freed from Andrews ’ mad reign of terror .
Let the kids go to beach .
Let kids them bikes and run and play outside WITHOUT masks .
Let kids visit friends .
Otherwise , you ’ ll have even more blood on your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elderly male suicide rates higher than before COVID A shocking rise in the number of Victorian males taking their own lives during the COVID pandemic has been revealed , and one Melbourne doctor fears it could be “ just the tip of the iceberg ” As many Victorian boys have taken their own lives in just nine months in 2020 , as did over whole years before the COVID-19 pandemic .
Melbourne surgeon Geoffrey Wells — who spearheaded a doctors ’ campaign against the city ’ s harsh lockdown — said he feared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tip of the iceberg ” and a tsunami of mental health harm was bearing down on Victoria .
Mr Wells , who will meet with new health Minister Martin Foley on Wednesday to express his fears , said doctors were at the coalface of the COVID-19 pandemic and should be consulted about coronavirus policies .
“ I ’ m still not sure who exactly is making health policy for Victoria ( but ) are they in a bubble , or just totally oblivious to the harm that ’ s occurring in Victorian society @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said there was now “ overwhelming evidence ” of the mental harm occurring in Melburnians because of the extended lockdown .
He was talking to other doctors regularly , who were reporting seeing more patients with poor mental health than ever , he said .
Particular fears were held for young Victorians , with evidence showing mental illness rates among teenagers were skyrocketing , he said .
And many of his own — mostly , older male — patients , were showing signs of depression because they could not see their families or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends , Mr Wells said .
“ There will also be much more harm that ’ s going to happen down the track — in three or four months — from delayed diagnosis and when we see the fallout from the economic disaster , ” he said .

Australian MP Graig Kelly continues to call for Dan Andrews to leave.
By Staff Reporter
JUST GO! RESIGN TODAY.
Pack up your ‘super-computer’ and just go.
You’ve continued to ignore the advice of hundreds of highly qualified and highly experienced doctors that have warned about the risk of increases in self-harm.
The children need to be freed from Andrews’ mad reign of terror.
Let the kids go to beach. Let kids them bikes and run and play outside WITHOUT masks. Let kids visit friends.
Otherwise, you’ll have even more blood on your hands.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/coronavirus/new-report-shows-teen-and-elderly-male-suicide-rates-higher-than-before-covid/news-story/a760218a9bac66abe1eff88f1584204b
New report shows teen and elderly male suicide rates higher than before COVID
A shocking rise in the number of Victorian males taking their own lives during the COVID pandemic has been revealed, and one Melbourne doctor fears it could be “just the tip of the iceberg”
As many Victorian boys have taken their own lives in just nine months in 2020, as did over whole years before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Melbourne surgeon Geoffrey Wells — who spearheaded a doctors’ campaign against the city’s harsh lockdown — said he feared the suicide figures were “just the tip of the iceberg” and a tsunami of mental health harm was bearing down on Victoria.
Mr Wells, who will meet with new health Minister Martin Foley on Wednesday to express his fears, said doctors were at the coalface of the COVID-19 pandemic and should be consulted about coronavirus policies.
“I’m still not sure who exactly is making health policy for Victoria (but) are they in a bubble, or just totally oblivious to the harm that’s occurring in Victorian society?” he questioned.
Mr Wells said there was now “overwhelming evidence” of the mental harm occurring in Melburnians because of the extended lockdown.
He was talking to other doctors regularly, who were reporting seeing more patients with poor mental health than ever, he said.
Particular fears were held for young Victorians, with evidence showing mental illness rates among teenagers were skyrocketing, he said.
And many of his own — mostly, older male — patients, were showing signs of depression because they could not see their families or attend the funerals of loved ones and friends, Mr Wells said.
“There will also be much more harm that’s going to happen down the track — in three or four months — from delayed diagnosis and when we see the fallout from the economic disaster,” he said.


australiannationalreview--2020-10-08--Hillary Clinton exposed as behind the Russia Gate scam as a corrupt election campaign strategy to be

Hillary Clinton exposed as behind the Russia Gate scam as a corrupt election campaign strategy to beat Trump .

URGENT: JUST 7 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...


australiannationalreview--2020-10-08--Dr. Rashid A. Buttar on Instagram: “WOW!!! WOW!!! WOW!!! There may just be some journalistic integri

Dr. Rashid A. Buttar on Instagram: “WOW!!! WOW!!! WOW!!! There may just be some journalistic integrity left on the plane

Dr. Rashid A. Buttar on Instagram : “ WOW !
!
!
WOW !
!
!
WOW !
!
!
@ @ @ @ @ journalistic integrity left on the plane .


australiannationalreview--2020-10-09--Get an understanding of the PCR tests they’re basing their “measures” on. Listen to the creator, Dr.

Get an understanding of the PCR tests they’re basing their “measures” on. Listen to the creator, Dr. Mullins, himself

Get an understanding of the PCR tests they ’ re basing their “ measures ” on .
Listen to the @ @ @ @ @ himself .


australiannationalreview--2020-10-09--World’s Top Epidemiologists Oppose Madman Fauci and Call for End to Lockdowns

World ’ s Top Epidemiologists Oppose Madman Fauci and Call for End to Lockdowns Three of the world ’ s @ @ @ @ @ to contradict Dr. Fauci and other doctor politicians who are calling for renewed lock-downs over @ @ @ @ @ interviewed Monday night by Laura Ingraham on Fox News .
They claim that the consensus @ @ @ @ @ NOT in favor of locking down entire populations , but only those at most risk @ @ @ @ @ for the end of lock-downs for the vast majority of the population who are not @ @ @ @ @ And they are not alone .
They published the “ Great Barrington ” declaration this @ @ @ @ @ signed by over 1000 medical and public health scientists within the first few hours of @ @ @

World’s Top Epidemiologists Oppose Madman Fauci and Call for End to Lockdowns
By Brian Shilhavy
Three of the world’s top epidemiologists are going public to contradict Dr. Fauci and other doctor politicians who are calling for renewed lock-downs over the Coronavirus.
They are:
Dr. Martin Kulldorff – Harvard Medical School Professor
Dr. Sunetra Gupta – Oxford University Epidemiology Professor
Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya – Stanford Epidemiology Professor
They were interviewed Monday night by Laura Ingraham on Fox News. They claim that the consensus in the scientific community is NOT in favor of locking down entire populations, but only those at most risk, and they are calling for the end of lock-downs for the vast majority of the population who are not at risk for COVID.
And they are not alone. They published the “Great Barrington” declaration this week which has already been signed by over 1000 medical and public health scientists within the first few hours of being published.
Watch the full interview:


australiannationalreview--2020-10-09--Brain cancer patient is refused hotel quarantine exemption in Queensland after life-saving surgery i

Brain cancer patient is refused hotel quarantine exemption in Queensland after life-saving surgery in Queensland .
To knowingly compromise the recovery of a person that has just under-gone life-saving brain surgery is crime against humanity – and to do it for political reasons is the lowest of the low .
How anyone could vote for this callous and cold-hearted women Palaszczuk after this is beyond me .
She shamed every Queenslander and shames every Australian .
A brain cancer patient has been refused an exemption from hotel quarantine in Queensland after undergoing life-saving surgery .
Gary Ralph , 71 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week and arrived home in Brisbane with his wife Wendy Child on Tuesday .
The couple hoped to quarantine at home because of Mr Ralph ’ s condition but instead , they were forced into a hotel , despite having been no community transmission of coronavirus in Sydney for 11 days .
‘ ’ It is life and death , it ’ s not a joke , it ’ s not a person wanting to play football in another state , which apparently that ’ s okay , ’ Ms Child told A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s border exemptions for athletes and movie stars , such as Tom Hanks , who has been permitted to avoid the mandatory hotel quarantine .
‘ Apparently , there are exemptions available but not for us .
Apparently we don ’ t qualify , we haven ’ t been told why we don ’ t qualify yet , ’ Ms Child explained .
Ms Child said there was ‘ no justification ’ for the couple to be denied an exemption as Sydney has gone 11 days without community transmitted coronavirus .
Mr Ralph @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his brain tumour was so aggressive that doctors in Brisbane told the couple it was inoperable .
Renowned surgeon Dr Charlie Teo agreed to operate on Mr Ralph in Sydney but made a shocking discovery .
The surgery uncovered multiple tumours on Mr Ralph ’ s brain and required a radical procedure that took away his ability to speak .
Mr Ralph can no longer form words or hold a pen and communicates by writing letters on his wife ’ s hand .
Dr Teo wrote a letter of support for the couple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s need for home quarantine was ‘ imperative ’ .
He explained they ‘ absolutely can not sit in a hotel room for two weeks ’ and Mr Ralph ’ s prognosis would be better the earlier he started chemotherapy .
Queensland Health will allow Mr Ralph to leave the hotel to attend his chemotherapy appointments , but he must travel by taxi or Uber , in the back seat with the windows down , and must wear a mask while doing so .
Ms Child called on the Queensland government to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ couple ‘ like decent human beings ’ .
‘ We want to be back in our own home , where we don ’ t have the added stress of everything the government is putting in our way , just to fight for my husband ’ s life .
’

Brain cancer patient is refused hotel quarantine exemption in Queensland after life-saving surgery in Queensland.
By Craig Kelly
To knowingly compromise the recovery of a person that has just under-gone life-saving brain surgery is crime against humanity – and to do it for political reasons is the lowest of the low.
How anyone could vote for this callous and cold-hearted women Palaszczuk after this is beyond me.
She shamed every Queenslander and shames every Australian.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8812347/Brain-cancer-patient-refused-hotel-quarantine-exemption-Queensland-surgery-Sydney.html
A brain cancer patient has been refused an exemption from hotel quarantine in Queensland after undergoing life-saving surgery.
Gary Ralph, 71, had radical brain surgery in Sydney last week and arrived home in Brisbane with his wife Wendy Child on Tuesday.
The couple hoped to quarantine at home because of Mr Ralph’s condition but instead, they were forced into a hotel, despite having been no community transmission of coronavirus in Sydney for 11 days.
‘’It is life and death, it’s not a joke, it’s not a person wanting to play football in another state, which apparently that’s okay,’ Ms Child told A Current Affair.
She slammed Queensland’s border exemptions for athletes and movie stars, such as Tom Hanks, who has been permitted to avoid the mandatory hotel quarantine.
‘Apparently, there are exemptions available but not for us. Apparently we don’t qualify, we haven’t been told why we don’t qualify yet,’ Ms Child explained.
Ms Child said there was ‘no justification’ for the couple to be denied an exemption as Sydney has gone 11 days without community transmitted coronavirus.
Mr Ralph’s condition has been deteriorating and his brain tumour was so aggressive that doctors in Brisbane told the couple it was inoperable.
Renowned surgeon Dr Charlie Teo agreed to operate on Mr Ralph in Sydney but made a shocking discovery.
The surgery uncovered multiple tumours on Mr Ralph’s brain and required a radical procedure that took away his ability to speak.
Mr Ralph can no longer form words or hold a pen and communicates by writing letters on his wife’s hand.
Dr Teo wrote a letter of support for the couple to enter Queensland and said Mr Ralph’s need for home quarantine was ‘imperative’.
He explained they ‘absolutely cannot sit in a hotel room for two weeks’ and Mr Ralph’s prognosis would be better the earlier he started chemotherapy.
Queensland Health will allow Mr Ralph to leave the hotel to attend his chemotherapy appointments, but he must travel by taxi or Uber, in the back seat with the windows down, and must wear a mask while doing so.
Ms Child called on the Queensland government to ‘show compassion’ and treat the couple ‘like decent human beings’.
‘We want to be back in our own home, where we don’t have the added stress of everything the government is putting in our way, just to fight for my husband’s life.’


australiannationalreview--2020-10-09--Morrison government grants indemnity for COVID-19 vaccine side effects yet refuses no fault compensa

Morrison government grants indemnity for COVID-19 vaccine side effects yet refuses no fault compensation for death and injuries that will occur to Australians from taking the vaccine .
The Morrison government has given the suppliers of two COVID-19 vaccines indemnity against prosecution for rare side effects that experts say are “ inevitable ” when a vaccine is rolled out to 25 million Australians .
But the government will not set up a statutory compensation scheme which the president of the Australian Medical Association , Omar Khorshid , said meant Australians who suffered “ extremely rare ” side effects from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seek compensation .
“ With a brand new vaccine , it ’ s going to be really hard to tell what is a vaccine injury and what is a rare medical condition that someone would have had anyway , ” Dr Khorshid said .
As part of its $ 1.7 billion deals to secure more than 84.8 million doses of the Oxford University and University of Queensland vaccines if successful , the federal government has indemnified the suppliers – meaning they can not be held liable for adverse events caused by the vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sponsor of the Oxford University vaccine , while the University of Queensland vaccine is being marketed by Seqirus ( CSL ) .
Plans to distribute the vaccine quickly across the population once successful phase three trials are complete mean the full safety picture will not be known when the first doses are administered .
Tuesday ’ s federal budget assumed a nation-wide vaccination program would be rolled out next year .
But the government has rejected calls to set up a no-fault vaccine injury compensation scheme , instead opting to pick up the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ member of the public takes legal action against the drug companies .
University of Sydney Associate Professor Nick Wood , a vaccine expert who designs hospital immunisation programs , said Australians who received a COVID-19 vaccine “ for the benefit of themselves and the community ” deserved the reassurance of a “ safety net ” through a no-fault scheme in case they experienced a rare adverse reaction .
Grattan Institute health economist Stephen Duckett , a former secretary of the federal health department , agreed that such a scheme was needed , saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adverse events associated with the vaccines and that some may take years to appear .
No-fault vaccine injury compensation schemes allow people who experience an adverse reaction to access compensation without having to convince a court that the vaccine was the cause of their injury .
Dr Duckett said safety data would continue to be collected after a COVID-19 vaccine was rolled out , giving a clearer picture over time of any adverse events , including by people in vulnerable groups such as diabetics and people with blood pressure conditions .
Professor Wood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ensuring that there was wide enough take-up of the vaccine for it to be effective at preventing COVID-19 from spreading .
“ If we get a scare and someone has a reaction , coverage will probably be hard to get up , ” he said .
The no-fault schemes operate in Canada , New Zealand , the United States , the United Kingdom , Austria , Denmark , Finland , France , Germany , Hungary , Iceland , Italy , Norway , Russia , Latvia , Slovenia , Sweden , Switzerland , China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Nepal and Thailand .
A spokesman for the federal health department said the government was “ committed to providing access to safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines ” and had agreed to indemnify the drug companies due to “ the need to appropriately share risks associated with achieving early access to a successful vaccine .
”

Morrison government grants indemnity for COVID-19 vaccine side effects yet refuses no fault compensation for death and injuries that will occur to Australians from taking the vaccine.
By Dana McCauley
The Morrison government has given the suppliers of two COVID-19 vaccines indemnity against prosecution for rare side effects that experts say are “inevitable” when a vaccine is rolled out to 25 million Australians.
But the government will not set up a statutory compensation scheme which the president of the Australian Medical Association, Omar Khorshid, said meant Australians who suffered “extremely rare” side effects from the vaccines would face a tough battle to seek compensation.
“With a brand new vaccine, it’s going to be really hard to tell what is a vaccine injury and what is a rare medical condition that someone would have had anyway,” Dr Khorshid said.
As part of its $1.7 billion deals to secure more than 84.8 million doses of the Oxford University and University of Queensland vaccines if successful, the federal government has indemnified the suppliers – meaning they cannot be held liable for adverse events caused by the vaccines.
British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca is the sponsor of the Oxford University vaccine, while the University of Queensland vaccine is being marketed by Seqirus (CSL).
Plans to distribute the vaccine quickly across the population once successful phase three trials are complete mean the full safety picture will not be known when the first doses are administered.
Tuesday’s federal budget assumed a nation-wide vaccination program would be rolled out next year.
But the government has rejected calls to set up a no-fault vaccine injury compensation scheme, instead opting to pick up the bill for any compensation payout if a member of the public takes legal action against the drug companies.
University of Sydney Associate Professor Nick Wood, a vaccine expert who designs hospital immunisation programs, said Australians who received a COVID-19 vaccine “for the benefit of themselves and the community” deserved the reassurance of a “safety net” through a no-fault scheme in case they experienced a rare adverse reaction.
Grattan Institute health economist Stephen Duckett, a former secretary of the federal health department, agreed that such a scheme was needed, saying there would “inevitably” be some adverse events associated with the vaccines and that some may take years to appear.
No-fault vaccine injury compensation schemes allow people who experience an adverse reaction to access compensation without having to convince a court that the vaccine was the cause of their injury.
Dr Duckett said safety data would continue to be collected after a COVID-19 vaccine was rolled out, giving a clearer picture over time of any adverse events, including by people in vulnerable groups such as diabetics and people with blood pressure conditions.
Professor Wood said community confidence would be vital in ensuring that there was wide enough take-up of the vaccine for it to be effective at preventing COVID-19 from spreading.
“If we get a scare and someone has a reaction, coverage will probably be hard to get up,” he said.
The no-fault schemes operate in Canada, New Zealand, the United States, the United Kingdom, Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Norway, Russia, Latvia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, China, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Nepal and Thailand.
A spokesman for the federal health department said the government was “committed to providing access to safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines” and had agreed to indemnify the drug companies due to “the need to appropriately share risks associated with achieving early access to a successful vaccine.”
#vote1imop #voice4choice #allona #nicklin #qldelection #timeforchange #future


australiannationalreview--2020-10-09--Will the Andrews administration be held responsible against their own standards & legislation?

Will the Andrews administration be held responsible against their own standards & legislation ?
Will the Andrews administration be held @ @ @ @ @ & legislation ?
The Victorian Labor Party made a commitment to the Victorian people that @ @ @ @ @ of workplace negligence seriously .
Now that a submission has been made to WorkSafe naming @ @ @ @ @ public servants of the Andrews Administration for their part in the hotel quarantine failure , @ @ @ @ @ to them or are they above the law ?

Will the Andrews administration be held responsible against their own standards & legislation?
By unsilencedspeech
Will the Andrews administration be held responsible against their own standards & legislation? The Victorian Labor Party made a commitment to the Victorian people that they will take the issue of workplace negligence seriously.
Now that a submission has been made to WorkSafe naming the Premier, ministers and public servants of the Andrews Administration for their part in the hotel quarantine failure, will the same standards apply to them or are they above the law?


australiannationalreview--2020-10-09--Disney accused of promoting Pedophilia

Disney accused of promoting Pedophilia

We count on YOU to make our work possible .
Today , a generous supporter will match your new monthly @ @ @ @ @ Review meaning your donation will go twice as far .
This is a challenging time @ @ @ @ @ if you ’ re able to make a monthly donation and provide us with support @ @ @ @ @ year , please do so today .
We also ask you apart from sharing our @ @ @ @ @ information to us , to contact mainstream media advertisers and tell them if they don @ @ @ @ @ their advertising to independent media such as the Australian National Review then you will boycott @ @ @ @ @ one way to hit mainstream media where it hurts them the most Help us help @ @ @ @ @ our freedoms .
If you have a business please consider advertising with us or sponsoring @ @ @ @ @ readers who will support companies that don ’ t support mainstream media .
As a @ @ @ @ @ to raise millions to compete against our foreign billion dollar mainstream media competitors .


australiannationalreview--2020-10-10--No Proof of COVID19 Causality: Is this the Crime of the Century?

No Proof of COVID19 Causality : Is this the Crime of the Century ?
Doctors are not using a licensed diagnostic tool to make the claim that all of the cases/deaths labelled as ‘ COVID19 ’ were caused by a single new virus .
They are using a RT-PCR test that specifically states “ it is not a diagnostic tool for viral infections ” .
Cases and deaths due to COVID19 have been collected based on many suspected ( unconfirmed ) cases only , and even when a laboratory test is used , the new SARSCov2 virus is not being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ cases or deaths .
Proof that SARSCov2 is causing COVID19 disease has not been provided by any government health department and the Australian government stated under the Freedom of Information act that they are not using a test that 100 % proves that SARSCov2 is present in any cases/deaths of COVID19 disease .
Here is the link to my article titled ‘ Creating a Global Pandemic ‘ that provides more detail on this manufactured pandemic in 2020 and it also describes the similarities to the polio pandemic in 1954 .
Many infectious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cause the paralysis that was being observed in children in 1954 .
However , the medical profession claimed it was a single virus that was causing the epidemic in children and a vaccine was introduced at the same time as changes were made to diagnostic criteria for polio and surveillance of the disease .
This resulted in the decline of ‘ polio ’ disease , but not paralysis in the population .
The scientific evidence is provided in my article .
Evidence from Doctors and Lawyers that the PCR test can not diagnose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich , states that the RT-PCR test can not identify SARSCOV2 , the claimed cause of COVID19 disease and describes this “ scamdemic ” as a “ crime against humanity ” – A Crime against humanity ’ 2 .
A pharmacist provides the TGA ’ s ( Australia ’ s drug regulator ) own evidence that the PCR test can not identify SARSCov2 – the claimed sole cause of COVID19 disease – “ Will the Corona Virus Vaccine be Mandated ” 3 .
“ Doctors for the Truth ” Speak out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pandemic ” – Press Conference in Spain .
Crime of the Century .
4 .
Proof that the Pandemic was Planned with Purpose ‘ – Principia Scientific International 5 .
There is no Deadly Pandemic : Global Report 2019-nCov Novel Coronavirus On 1 October 2020 my article titled ‘ Creating a Global Pandemic ’ was published in the Masters of Health magazine .
This article describes how disease statistics can hide many factors and they can be manipulated to create the appearance of a pandemic if doctors are not required to provide proof @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or ‘ death ’ of the disease .
This strategy works best if you also change the definition of a ‘ pandemic ’ and remove the need for there to be ‘ enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses ’ in the community .
If you only need ‘ more cases than normal of a disease ’ these cases can be obtained by extra surveillance of the healthy population .
A strategy that has never been used to monitor for “ influenza ” in previous years .
This extra surveillance works best if hospitals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ symptoms ’ in the healthy population with extra funding – as they are in Australia .
Note that 2020 was the first time that hundreds of stations were set up to test healthy people for ‘ flu-like symptoms ’ .
Coronaviruses make up 7-15 % of the respiratory viruses that cause the common cold .
If healthy people had been tested for influenza in previous years , with the RT-PCR test and antibody tests , a similar number of people would have tested positive because this test identifies the family of RNA coronaviruses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even a whole virus .
So the RT-PCR test can not be used to diagnose ‘ cases ’ of COVID19 disease .
Plus healthy people should never be considered ‘ cases ’ of disease .
Yet these are the statistics that the mainstream media has been using to frighten the public about a new virus .
This works best if you give it a scary name – SARSCov2 – instead of referring to it as the Novel Coronavirus 2019 – its other name .
And don ’ t forget we are exposed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In Germany an independent commission of doctors investigating COVID19 has described this pandemic as the “ crime of the century ” .
In 2020 we were informed there was a new disease called ‘ COVID19 ’ that encompasses all flu-like symptoms ” , as well as neurological damage that was also claimed to be caused by the virus .
These symptoms have many causes ; hundreds of different viruses , bacteria and even non-infectious agents cause these symptoms .
Yet the public was told that all these cases and deaths were caused by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ example of a non-infectious agent that causes COVID19 symptoms is the flu vaccine and this vaccine was mandated for the first time in many countries , including China , Italy and Australia , in 2019-20 .
There is significant medical literature showing that flu vaccines increase the chance of people getting sick from coronaviruses , which are common in the population .
Further , flu vaccines are also associated with causing neurological damage such as vasculitis , strokes , heart attacks , lung edema and pneumonia – other symptoms that are included in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

No Proof of COVID19 Causality: Is this the Crime of the Century?
By Dr Judy Wilyman PhD
Doctors are not using a licensed diagnostic tool to make the claim that all of the cases/deaths labelled as ‘COVID19’ were caused by a single new virus. They are using a RT-PCR test that specifically states “it is not a diagnostic tool for viral infections”.
Cases and deaths due to COVID19 have been collected based on many suspected (unconfirmed) cases only, and even when a laboratory test is used, the new SARSCov2 virus is not being identified in any of these ‘positive’ cases or deaths.
Proof that SARSCov2 is causing COVID19 disease has not been provided by any government health department and the Australian government stated under the Freedom of Information act that they are not using a test that 100% proves that SARSCov2 is present in any cases/deaths of COVID19 disease.
Here is the link to my article titled ‘Creating a Global Pandemic‘ that provides more detail on this manufactured pandemic in 2020 and it also describes the similarities to the polio pandemic in 1954.
Many infectious agents and non-infectious agents were known to cause the paralysis that was being observed in children in 1954. However, the medical profession claimed it was a single virus that was causing the epidemic in children and a vaccine was introduced at the same time as changes were made to diagnostic criteria for polio and surveillance of the disease.
This resulted in the decline of ‘polio’ disease, but not paralysis in the population. The scientific evidence is provided in my article.
Evidence from Doctors and Lawyers that the PCR test cannot diagnose COVID19 Disease
1. German lawyer, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, states that the RT-PCR test cannot identify SARSCOV2, the claimed cause of COVID19 disease and describes this “scamdemic” as a “crime against humanity” – A Crime against humanity’
2. A pharmacist provides the TGA’s (Australia’s drug regulator) own evidence that the PCR test cannot identify SARSCov2 – the claimed sole cause of COVID19 disease – “Will the Corona Virus Vaccine be Mandated”
3. “Doctors for the Truth” Speak out in Madrid, Denounce COVID19 “False Pandemic” – Press Conference in Spain. Crime of the Century.
4. Proof that the Pandemic was Planned with Purpose‘ – Principia Scientific International
5. There is no Deadly Pandemic: Global Report 2019-nCov Novel Coronavirus
Creating a Global Pandemic
On 1 October 2020 my article titled ‘Creating a Global Pandemic’ was published in the Masters of Health magazine. This article describes how disease statistics can hide many factors and they can be manipulated to create the appearance of a pandemic if doctors are not required to provide proof of causality for a ‘case’ or ‘death’ of the disease.
This strategy works best if you also change the definition of a ‘pandemic’ and remove the need for there to be ‘enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses’ in the community. If you only need ‘more cases than normal of a disease’ these cases can be obtained by extra surveillance of the healthy population. A strategy that has never been used to monitor for “influenza” in previous years.
This extra surveillance works best if hospitals are incentivised to monitor for ‘flu-like symptoms’ in the healthy population with extra funding – as they are in Australia.
Note that 2020 was the first time that hundreds of stations were set up to test healthy people for ‘flu-like symptoms’. Coronaviruses make up 7-15% of the respiratory viruses that cause the common cold. If healthy people had been tested for influenza in previous years, with the RT-PCR test and antibody tests, a similar number of people would have tested positive because this test identifies the family of RNA coronaviruses – not specific strains of virus or even a whole virus.
So the RT-PCR test cannot be used to diagnose ‘cases’ of COVID19 disease. Plus healthy people should never be considered ‘cases’ of disease. Yet these are the statistics that the mainstream media has been using to frighten the public about a new virus. This works best if you give it a scary name – SARSCov2 – instead of referring to it as the Novel Coronavirus 2019 – its other name. And don’t forget we are exposed to new mutated influenza viruses every year!
In Germany an independent commission of doctors investigating COVID19 has described this pandemic as the “crime of the century”.
A Description of COVID19 Disease
In 2020 we were informed there was a new disease called ‘COVID19’ that encompasses all flu-like symptoms”, as well as neurological damage that was also claimed to be caused by the virus. These symptoms have many causes; hundreds of different viruses, bacteria and even non-infectious agents cause these symptoms.
Yet the public was told that all these cases and deaths were caused by just one virus – SARSCov2.
An example of a non-infectious agent that causes COVID19 symptoms is the flu vaccine and this vaccine was mandated for the first time in many countries, including China, Italy and Australia, in 2019-20.
There is significant medical literature showing that flu vaccines increase the chance of people getting sick from coronaviruses, which are common in the population. Further, flu vaccines are also associated with causing neurological damage such as vasculitis, strokes, heart attacks, lung edema and pneumonia – other symptoms that are included in the diagnosis for ‘COVID19 disease’.


THE TRUMP CURE

I see there is some concern about the drug Regeneron that Trump is promising to make free for those who need it .
I want to remind you that Trump ALSO said that “ other ” drugs will be made available .
Put these two “ cures ” together and what does this mean ?
It means ( 1 ) a vaccine is not needed , ( 2 ) people can go VOTE IN PERSON and NOT BE SCARED to do so .
Because Trump just proved that recovery is ( can be ) a breeze – and everyone will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had ) access to .
Instead of having concern about Regeneron and where it comes from and how it is made , let ’ s instead have WAY MORE concern about the plan that Trump interrupted when he became President : The nuclear destruction of many cities in the United States of America and the handover of our country to China ( and other rogue countries and elements ) .
Everything is at stake .
The PLANDEMIC was launched ( a bioweapon ) to get Trump out of office so that the Deep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue .

THE TRUMP CURE.
By Staff Reporter
I see there is some concern about the drug Regeneron that Trump is promising to make free for those who need it. I want to remind you that Trump ALSO said that “other” drugs will be made available. Put these two “cures” together and what does this mean? It means (1) a vaccine is not needed, (2) people can go VOTE IN PERSON and NOT BE SCARED to do so. Because Trump just proved that recovery is (can be) a breeze – and everyone will have access to what he has (had) access to.
Instead of having concern about Regeneron and where it comes from and how it is made, let’s instead have WAY MORE concern about the plan that Trump interrupted when he became President: The nuclear destruction of many cities in the United States of America and the handover of our country to China (and other rogue countries and elements).
Everything is at stake. The PLANDEMIC was launched (a bioweapon) to get Trump out of office so that the Deep State plans to destroy the USA could continue.


australiannationalreview--2020-10-10--Andrew Kaufman on the Highwire w/Del Bigtree 7-16-20


australiannationalreview--2020-10-10--We seem to talk non-stop about “race”, not “issues”, so this hilarious 1/2 Persian Comedian takes a

We seem to talk non-stop about “race”, not “issues”, so this hilarious 1/2 Persian Comedian takes a deeper look at TRUMP vs BIDEN. WHO IS MOST RACIST?!?

We seem to talk non-stop about “ race ” , not “ issues ” , so this hilarious 1/2 Persian @ @ @ @ @ at TRUMP vs BIDEN .
WHO IS MOST RACIST ?
!
?


australiannationalreview--2020-10-12--Bill Gates says Trump’s coronavirus treatment won’t work for everyone, shouldn’t be called ‘cure’

Bill Gates says Trump ’ s coronavirus treatment won ’ t work for everyone , shouldn ’ t be called ‘ cure ’ .
Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates said Sunday that the Regeneron antibody cocktail administered to President Trump to treat a case of COVID-19 shouldn ’ t be referred to as a “ cure.
” “ The word ‘ cure ’ is inappropriate because it doesn ’ t work for everyone , ” Gates told NBC ’ s “ Meet the Press.
” “ But yes , of all the therapeutics , this is the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an ultimate goal for putting an end to the pandemic , Gates noted that monoclonal antibodies allow for treatment that doesn ’ t require admission to a high percentage of the population .
“ With the monoclonal antibodies , it ’ s only once somebody tests positive , show symptoms and they ’ re old enough they ’ re at risk , ” Gates said .
“ That ’ s the target for this therapeutic.
” He added that if the monoclonal antibody treatments can be approved for an emergency use authorization in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ save more lives than the vaccine will , ” particularly if given in low doses .
“ The president got eight grams and we ’ re trialing things that are down at more like 0.7 grams , and 0.3 grams , ” Gates said .
“ Of course , that changes the cost and capacity a lot but that ’ s also unproven at this point , but it ’ s important that we explore.
” Gates is optimistic that antibody treatments , including those developed by Regeneron and Eli Lilly , could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next few months , but warned against the president ’ s recent push for the regulators to accelerate the approval timeline .
“ You don ’ t want politicians saying something should be approved because it ’ s wrong to think of political pressure as needing to be appropriate in these cases , ” he said .
As for vaccines , Gates said the majority of vaccines will likely get emergency use authorizations by early next year , with Pfizer and BioNTech ’ s vaccine potentially being an exception with a possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ The phase three data is the key thing , particularly for the safety , making sure we ’ re not seeing side effects .
So the tool is ramping up and , over the course of the first half of the year , those volumes will get to the point where we really will be asking Americans to , you know , step forward , ” Gates said .
“ The effectiveness could range , you know , could be as low as 50 % or as high as 80 [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different of the vaccines , some will fail completely and others will hit a very high bar .
But we don ’ t know yet.
” He added that almost all of the vaccines will most likely require two shots , with the potential exception of Johnson and Johnson , which is currently conducting phase three trials of their vaccine candidate involving a single dose .
Despite taking issue with the United States ’ response to the pandemic , Gates believes there is still hope to turn things around and that the focus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ focusing on getting the diagnostics right .
“ Don ’ t say that the FDA is being pressured to do something so that their integrity is clear cut , ” Gates added .
“ And then , you know , on the vaccine front , get it to everyone with the right message , including get it to the world so the disease isn ’ t constantly coming back in our country.
” He believes that the only way to get back to normal is by having a vaccine that is “ super @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people take ” and can be distributed to the entire world in order to eliminate the disease on a global basis .
Gates ’ comments come as the coronavirus has surpassed 37 million cases worldwide , with more than 7.7 million cases impacting the United States alone .
According to Johns Hopkins University , there are more than 1 million related deaths worldwide , with the United States accounting for more than 214,000 of them .

Bill Gates says Trump’s coronavirus treatment won’t work for everyone, shouldn’t be called ‘cure’.
By Lucas Manfredi | FOX Business
Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates said Sunday that the Regeneron antibody cocktail administered to President Trump to treat a case of COVID-19 shouldn’t be referred to as a “cure.”
“The word ‘cure’ is inappropriate because it doesn’t work for everyone,” Gates told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “But yes, of all the therapeutics, this is the most promising.”
Although an effective vaccine is an ultimate goal for putting an end to the pandemic, Gates noted that monoclonal antibodies allow for treatment that doesn’t require admission to a high percentage of the population.
“With the monoclonal antibodies, it’s only once somebody tests positive, show symptoms and they’re old enough they’re at risk,” Gates said. “That’s the target for this therapeutic.”
He added that if the monoclonal antibody treatments can be approved for an emergency use authorization in a timely manner, they will “save more lives than the vaccine will,” particularly if given in low doses.
“The president got eight grams and we’re trialing things that are down at more like 0.7 grams, and 0.3 grams,” Gates said. “Of course, that changes the cost and capacity a lot but that’s also unproven at this point, but it’s important that we explore.”
REGENERON CEO SAYS PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ANTIBODY COCKTAIL TREATMENT IS ‘CASE REPORT’
Gates is optimistic that antibody treatments, including those developed by Regeneron and Eli Lilly, could potentially earn an emergency use authorization within the next few months, but warned against the president’s recent push for the regulators to accelerate the approval timeline.
“You don’t want politicians saying something should be approved because it’s wrong to think of political pressure as needing to be appropriate in these cases,” he said.
Ticker Security Last Change Change % REGN REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC. 602.07 +2.19 +0.37% LLY ELI LILLY & COMPANY 156.88 +3.38 +2.20%
As for vaccines, Gates said the majority of vaccines will likely get emergency use authorizations by early next year, with Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine potentially being an exception with a possible authorization by the end of this year.
“The phase three data is the key thing, particularly for the safety, making sure we’re not seeing side effects. So the tool is ramping up and, over the course of the first half of the year, those volumes will get to the point where we really will be asking Americans to, you know, step forward,” Gates said. “The effectiveness could range, you know, could be as low as 50% or as high as 80 [percent] or 90% and, different of the vaccines, some will fail completely and others will hit a very high bar. But we don’t know yet.”
Ticker Security Last Change Change % PFE PFIZER INC. 36.79 -0.10 -0.27% BNTX BIONTECH 89.04 +1.09 +1.24% JNJ JOHNSON & JOHNSON 150.97 +2.08 +1.40% MRNA MODERNA INC. 73.00 +0.07 +0.10% AZN ASTRAZENECA PLC 54.72 +0.63 +1.16%
He added that almost all of the vaccines will most likely require two shots, with the potential exception of Johnson and Johnson, which is currently conducting phase three trials of their vaccine candidate involving a single dose.
Despite taking issue with the United States’ response to the pandemic, Gates believes there is still hope to turn things around and that the focus should be less on assessing blame and focusing on getting the diagnostics right.
“Don’t say that the FDA is being pressured to do something so that their integrity is clear cut,” Gates added. “And then, you know, on the vaccine front, get it to everyone with the right message, including get it to the world so the disease isn’t constantly coming back in our country.”
He believes that the only way to get back to normal is by having a vaccine that is “super effective and that a lot of the people take” and can be distributed to the entire world in order to eliminate the disease on a global basis.
Gates’ comments come as the coronavirus has surpassed 37 million cases worldwide, with more than 7.7 million cases impacting the United States alone. According to Johns Hopkins University, there are more than 1 million related deaths worldwide, with the United States accounting for more than 214,000 of them.


australiannationalreview--2020-10-12--Allen Harrow Parrot (CIA whistleblower) talks to Charles Woods


australiannationalreview--2020-10-12--WHO official urges world leaders to stop using lockdowns as primary virus control method

WHO official urges world leaders to stop using lockdowns as primary virus control method .
The World Health Organization ’ s special envoy on COVID-19 urged world leaders this week to stop “ using lockdowns as your primary control method.
” “ We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus , ” Dr. David Nabarro said to The Spectator ’ s Andrew Neil .
“ The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize , regroup , rebalance your resources , protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but by and large , we ’ d rather not do it.
” Nabarro went on to point out several of the negative consequences lockdowns have caused across the world , including devastating tourism industries and increased hunger and poverty .
“ Just look at what ’ s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean , for example , or in the Pacific because people aren ’ t taking their holidays , ” he said .
“ Look what ’ s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world .
… Look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year .
We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.
” Earlier this week , thousands of medical health experts signed their names to a petition calling for the end of coronavirus lockdowns , citing the “ irreparable damage ” they ’ ve caused .
“ As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists , we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies , and recommend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” read the petition , known as the Great Barrington Declaration .
“ Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.
” In the United States , lockdowns have been tied to , a , an , and a concluded that stress and anxiety from lockdowns could destroy seven times the years of life that lockdowns potentially save .

WHO official urges world leaders to stop using lockdowns as primary virus control method.
By Andrew Mark Miller, Social Media Producer
The World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19 urged world leaders this week to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method.”
“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Dr. David Nabarro said to The Spectator’s Andrew Neil. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
Nabarro went on to point out several of the negative consequences lockdowns have caused across the world, including devastating tourism industries and increased hunger and poverty.
“Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” he said. “Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. … Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”
Earlier this week, thousands of medical health experts signed their names to a petition calling for the end of coronavirus lockdowns, citing the “irreparable damage” they’ve caused.
“As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection,” read the petition, known as the Great Barrington Declaration. “Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.”


australiannationalreview--2020-10-12--World Health Organization saying “lockdowns should not be in place”

World Health Organization saying “ lockdowns should not be in place ” Daniel Andrews ’ decrees from the podium have zero standing and will never stand up in court when the BS fines are challenged .
They ’ re all a big bluff .
It ’ s no wonder the Magistrates Court has adjourned all Covid challenged fines well into 2021 .
If one illegal fine gets before a court , Andrews will buckle like he did with the Curfew when it was uncovered as a fraud .
The Directions Order will be found to be as illegal as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was challenged in the Supreme Court , is was quickly ended by Andrews .
The 5klm restraint is equally illegal as an excessive restraint on the rights of Victorians .
If Victorians have no rights , as Andrews asserts , then why mention them in the Act ?
While Andrews can ’ t be removed as Premier , he is subject to the Westminster system Separation of Powers , which means the Parliament or Courts can clip his wings and stop his tyranny .
As he has the numbers and Parliament and it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s useless to try a no confidence motion against Andrews , so we ’ re left with the Judiciary and the Courts .
Being awake and informed will set you free .
With the legal illusion of fines swept away , so is lockdown .
We decide when the lockdown ends , not Daniel Andrews .
The police will run out of ink in their pens writing fines if we don ’ t co-operate .
It was for this reason Daniel Andrews wanted detention powers in his Omnibus Bill .
He feared someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and wake up Victoria .
Repost this as far and wide as you can .
Know this .
Lockdown Orders have zero legal standing .
Why did Daniel Andrews desperately want the Omnibus detention powers ?
He had the existing fines mechanism to enforce Directions orders which are the basis of the lockdown .
So why the need for new powers .
This answer is because people are waking up .
Everyone should go and read page 106 of The Public Health and Wellbeing Act Division 1 Section 111 .
It sates : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be prevented or minimised with the MINIMUM RESTRICTIONS on the RIGHTS of any person .
Has that been happening ?
No .
Why ?
The clause doesn ’ t say ; the restrictions on the rights of any person will be minimum to contain the spread of an infectious diseases .
If the clause ’ s construction read this way , it would attempt to give the Chief Health Officer arbitery power to decide what ’ s minimum to get his job done as he sees fit , and with no consideration or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights being restricted , thinks .
This is not how the law works or what they clause says .
The legal drafting and clause construction is very clear .
It says ; the Chief Health Officer can do his job to stop the spread of infectious disease , BUT a person ’ s rights restrictions must be minimal .
He has a qualifier and restraint .
So who does decide what ’ s minimum ?
If a person , whose rights are being restricted , has no say in the matter , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the clause in the legislation .
The Parliament sought to preserve and protect civil liberties .
That is the purpose of the clause , otherwise , why have it in the legislation if the Chief Health Officer has unrestrained powers ?
It ’ s a reminder and constraint on the Chief Health Officer .
The Westminster system constrains , separates checks and contains power , through a mechanism known as the Separation of Powers .
This means that legislature ( who makes laws ) , the Executive ( Premier and Ministry ) who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interpret laws , remain separate .
This is a check on power so it ’ s not concentrated as we seem to have in Victoria at the present .
The default ‘ Mentis ’ ( mind ) of Parliament , in a liberal democracy , is to preserve freedoms .
Particularly the freedom of movement and association which the High Court has protected over and over and now Daniel Andrews thinks he can extinguish .
The person who decides what a minimum restraint on a person ’ s rights is the person who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has no say on what ’ s a restraint , the person would be deemed to have no rights , so why mention them ?
In this event , the person at best has privileges that can be limited or extinguished .
True rights can only be suspended or limited by the right ’ s holder .
These are known as inalienable rights .
God given which can not be extinguished by the State , the Chief Health Officer or Daniel Andrews .
Division 1 Section 111 was drafted in acknowledgment of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even referred to as the Principle of the Act , against which all Directions Orders must be measured .
What I have just set out is legal argument by a Barrister might make before a Magistrate , who is usually ill equipped to handle such arguments .
Now you understand why the last thing Daniel Andrews wants is fines to be challenged in Court .
Push the problem into the future .
Maybe , even forgive fines so they never see a courtroom Victorians don ’ t know or understand the law , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oblivious and kept in the dark .
The average police member in the street is even less well equipped to handle these matters , so don ’ t try to enlighten them or argue whilst being issued with an illegal and worthless fine .
They have no idea .
In any event , fines are only allegations and not findings of fact or guilt .
Fines become an admission of guilt when you pay them .
That ’ s why the fines can be challenged .

World Health Organization saying “lockdowns should not be in place”
By Staff Reporter
Daniel Andrews’ decrees from the podium have zero standing and will never stand up in court when the BS fines are challenged. They’re all a big bluff.
The lockdown is a bluff.
It’s no wonder the Magistrates Court has adjourned all Covid challenged fines well into 2021.
If one illegal fine gets before a court, Andrews will buckle like he did with the Curfew when it was uncovered as a fraud.
The Directions Order will be found to be as illegal as the Curfew. The day before the Curfew was challenged in the Supreme Court, is was quickly ended by Andrews.
The 5klm restraint is equally illegal as an excessive restraint on the rights of Victorians.
I remind you.
If Victorians have no rights, as Andrews asserts, then why mention them in the Act?
While Andrews can’t be removed as Premier, he is subject to the Westminster system Separation of Powers, which means the Parliament or Courts can clip his wings and stop his tyranny.
As he has the numbers and Parliament and it’s not sitting, it’s useless to try a no confidence motion against Andrews, so we’re left with the Judiciary and the Courts.
Spread this across social media.
Being awake and informed will set you free.
With the legal illusion of fines swept away, so is lockdown.
We decide when the lockdown ends, not Daniel Andrews.
The police will run out of ink in their pens writing fines if we don’t co-operate.
It was for this reason Daniel Andrews wanted detention powers in his Omnibus Bill.
He feared someone would write a post like this, and wake up Victoria.
Repost this as far and wide as you can.
36 minutes ago
Know this. Lockdown Orders have zero legal standing.
Why did Daniel Andrews desperately want the Omnibus detention powers?
He had the existing fines mechanism to enforce Directions orders which are the basis of the lockdown.
So why the need for new powers.
This answer is because people are waking up.
Everyone should go and read page 106 of The Public Health and Wellbeing Act Division 1 Section 111.
It sates: the spread of an infectious disease should be prevented or minimised with the MINIMUM RESTRICTIONS on the RIGHTS of any person.
Has that been happening? No.
Why? The clause doesn’t say; the restrictions on the rights of any person will be minimum to contain the spread of an infectious diseases.
If the clause’s construction read this way, it would attempt to give the Chief Health Officer arbitery power to decide what’s minimum to get his job done as he sees fit, and with no consideration or reference to what the person, whose rights being restricted, thinks.
This is not how the law works or what they clause says.
The legal drafting and clause construction is very clear.
It says; the Chief Health Officer can do his job to stop the spread of infectious disease, BUT a person’s rights restrictions must be minimal.
He has a qualifier and restraint.
He doesn’t decide what’s minimum.
So who does decide what’s minimum?
If a person, whose rights are being restricted, has no say in the matter, there would have been no need to include the clause in the legislation.
The Parliament sought to preserve and protect civil liberties.
It’s a check on unfettered powers.
That is the purpose of the clause, otherwise, why have it in the legislation if the Chief Health Officer has unrestrained powers? It’s a reminder and constraint on the Chief Health Officer.
The Westminster system constrains, separates checks and contains power, through a mechanism known as the Separation of Powers.
This means that legislature (who makes laws), the Executive (Premier and Ministry) who execute law, and the Judiciary who interpret laws, remain separate.
This is a check on power so it’s not concentrated as we seem to have in Victoria at the present.
The default ‘Mentis’ (mind) of Parliament, in a liberal democracy, is to preserve freedoms.
Particularly the freedom of movement and association which the High Court has protected over and over and now Daniel Andrews thinks he can extinguish.
The person who decides what a minimum restraint on a person’s rights is the person who has the rights.
If that person has no say on what’s a restraint, the person would be deemed to have no rights, so why mention them? In this event, the person at best has privileges that can be limited or extinguished.
Like a driving license.
True rights can only be suspended or limited by the right’s holder.
These are known as inalienable rights.
God given which cannot be extinguished by the State, the Chief Health Officer or Daniel Andrews.
Division 1 Section 111 was drafted in acknowledgment of this liberal democratic principle.
The Section is even referred to as the Principle of the Act, against which all Directions Orders must be measured.
Case closed.
What I have just set out is legal argument by a Barrister might make before a Magistrate, who is usually ill equipped to handle such arguments.
Now you understand why the last thing Daniel Andrews wants is fines to be challenged in Court.
Push the problem into the future.
Maybe, even forgive fines so they never see a courtroom Victorians don’t know or understand the law, and Andrews feels omnipotent whilst Victorians are oblivious and kept in the dark. The average police member in the street is even less well equipped to handle these matters, so don’t try to enlighten them or argue whilst being issued with an illegal and worthless fine. They have no idea.
They’re just following orders.
In any event, fines are only allegations and not findings of fact or guilt.
Fines become an admission of guilt when you pay them. That’s why the fines can be challenged.


australiannationalreview--2020-10-12--Is green energy green? “Take a look at what it takes to make “green” energy.

Is green energy green ?
“ Take a look at what it takes to make “ green ” energy .
@ @ @ @ @ it takes to make “ green ” energy .
This confirms even further that the @ @ @ @ @ to do with saving the planet , but seizing governmental power .
Yes you can @ @ @ @ @ the earth and sustainability .

Is green energy green? “Take a look at what it takes to make “green” energy.
By Jake Ryan
Take a look at what it takes to make “green” energy. This confirms even further that the green new deal has nothing to do with saving the planet, but seizing governmental power. Yes you can be conservative and care about the earth and sustainability.


australiannationalreview--2020-10-12--OVER 17,000 HEALTH EXPERTS SIGN HISTORIC COVID DECLARATION

Three of the world ’ s leading infectious disease specialists from Stanford , Harvard & Oxford created “ The Great @ @ @ @ @ for an immediate withdrawal of strict lockdown measures for healthy populations , and “ Focused @ @ @ @ @ vulnerable .
As we post this segment , almost 18,000 medical practitioners and public health @ @ @ @ @ in support .


australiannationalreview--2020-10-10--Jamie McIntyre: “Most of us know it by now. Covid is a fraud. A swindle, a scam”

Jamie McIntyre : “ Most of us know it by now .
Covid is a fraud .
A swindle , @ @ @ @ @ of us know it by now .
Covid is a fraud .
A swindle , @ @ @ @ @ t mean you can ’ t die from it .
But it wouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ health issues to be concerned about .
So if you still know anyone with more @ @ @ @ @ wishes to still push this Covid Fraud , then I have $ 1 million if @ @ @ @ @ s not .
Put or shut up I say .
End the bullshit and destruction @ @ @ @ @ over a falsified pandemic .
Www.anrnews.com

Jamie McIntyre: “Most of us know it by now. Covid is a fraud. A swindle, a scam”.
By Jamie McIntyre
Most of us know it by now. Covid is a fraud. A swindle, a scam. Doesn’t mean you can’t die from it. But it wouldn’t make the top ten thousand health issues to be concerned about. So if you still know anyone with more degrees then brains, or wishes to still push this Covid Fraud, then I have $1 million if they can prove it’s not. Put or shut up I say. End the bullshit and destruction of our economy and democracy over a falsified pandemic. Www.anrnews.com
Original source: https://www.instagram.com/tv/CGEPfpaFQIc/?igshid=1uzvbwcq26aoz


australiannationalreview--2020-10-10--Many obvious ways to know that Covid is a fraud

Many obvious ways to know that Covid is a fraud Many obvious ways to know that Covid is a fraud @ @ @ @ @ on the crimes against humanity pushed by this obvious fraud .


australiannationalreview--2020-10-13--Benghazi Whistleblower explains what is coming!

Interview with Benghazi Whistleblower Nick Noe shares his story and information that will be released through Media outlets soon .
@ @ @ @ @ to break in American History !
!


australiannationalreview--2020-10-13--Notes for (and draft of) complaint against Daniel Andrews to the International Criminal Court

Notes for ( and draft of ) complaint against Daniel Andrews to the International Criminal Court .
This is a @ @ @ @ @ evolve as things develop .
I prepared this and sent to two lawyers last night @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ll add info .
Please provide any info you wish to see included @ @ @ @ @ the comments section or at sabhlok @ gmail.com .
More legislative provisions that have been @

Notes for (and draft of) complaint against Daniel Andrews to the International Criminal Court.
By Sanjeev Sabhlok
This is a placeholder post and information will evolve as things develop.
I prepared this and sent to two lawyers last night. As the complaint evolves I’ll add info. Please provide any info you wish to see included in the complaint either through the comments section or at sabhlok@gmail.com.
More legislative provisions that have been breached
FRADULENT COVID DEATH CERTIFICATES?
ABS Guidance for Certifying Deaths due to COVID-19
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO REPORT COVID-19 CASES
STOPPING PROTESTS


australiannationalreview--2020-10-13--Trump believes he can break the deep state

Trump believes he can break the deep state .
WHY PRESIDENT TRUMP DOESN ’ T DRINK : A closer look @ @ @ @ @ teenage years , and relationship with brother Fred Trump Jr .


australiannationalreview--2020-10-13--Joe Biden debates a worthy opponent, Joe Biden

Joe Biden debates a worthy opponent , Himself .
Joe has been on every side of every issue .
He @ @ @ @ @ Radical Left .