australiannationalreview--2020-06-22--Twitter says, pedophiles are permitted to discuss ‘attraction towards minors’ and share some depicti

Twitter says, pedophiles are permitted to discuss ‘attraction towards minors’ and share some depictions of nude children

Social media giant Twitter has updated their terms of service to allow their users to discuss adult attraction to minors as well as share artistic depictions of nude children .
The updated policy states : “ Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted , provided they don ’ t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.
” Twitter went on to allow for nude depictions of minors in certain instances , stating : “ Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by internationally renowned artists that feature minors.
” Shane Trejo over at Big League Politics , suggests the social media platform may have amended their policy at the behest of Dr James Cantor , who describes himself as a proud Jewish homosexual .
According to Trejo , Cantor is a leading researcher and advocate for pedophiles , who he refers to as minor-attracted persons .
Trejo notes that last year , Cantor along with other university academics , wrote a letter to Twitter ’ s Director of Trust and Safety , urging the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discuss their attraction to children .
The normalisation of pedophilia appears to be the next frontier for the culture-destroying progressives intent on abolishing every last remnant of Christian morality .
And they ’ re gaining ground , quickly .
About ten years ago , an Australian man was convicted of possessing child pornography , fined $ 3,000 and required to enter a two-year good behaviour bond in relation to each offence .
The pornographic content in the man ’ s possession comprised of a series of cartoons depicting underage characters from The Simpsons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a decade and almost identical content can now be legally streamed into your living room thanks to programs like Netflix ’ s animated series Big Mouth .
Earlier this year video messaging app , Snapchat , was accused of attempting to normalise pedophilia , after releasing their LGBTQ Pride Month filter which included the caption , “ Love has no age ” .
Google adopted a similar line in marketing their “ LGBTQ-friendly ” business tag , which marks companies as allies of LGBTQ ideology and “ safe spaces ” for transgender people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business feature includes a voice-over which states , “ Love is love .
It takes no notice of age.
” Meanwhile , the entire “ Drag Kid ” phenomenon , which features pre-teen boys performing for adults while dressed as sexualised women , is being applauded and celebrated by mainstream media .

By Ben Davis
Social media giant Twitter has updated their terms of service to allow their users to discuss adult attraction to minors as well as share artistic depictions of nude children.
The updated policy states: “Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.”
Twitter went on to allow for nude depictions of minors in certain instances, stating: “Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors.”
Shane Trejo over at Big League Politics, suggests the social media platform may have amended their policy at the behest of Dr James Cantor, who describes himself as a proud Jewish homosexual.
According to Trejo, Cantor is a leading researcher and advocate for pedophiles, who he refers to as minor-attracted persons.
Trejo notes that last year, Cantor along with other university academics, wrote a letter to Twitter’s Director of Trust and Safety, urging the platform to allow pedophiles to network and discuss their attraction to children.
The normalisation of pedophilia appears to be the next frontier for the culture-destroying progressives intent on abolishing every last remnant of Christian morality. And they’re gaining ground, quickly.
About ten years ago, an Australian man was convicted of possessing child pornography, fined $3,000 and required to enter a two-year good behaviour bond in relation to each offence.
The pornographic content in the man’s possession comprised of a series of cartoons depicting underage characters from The Simpsons engaging in sex acts.
Fast forward a decade and almost identical content can now be legally streamed into your living room thanks to programs like Netflix’s animated series Big Mouth.
Earlier this year video messaging app, Snapchat, was accused of attempting to normalise pedophilia, after releasing their LGBTQ Pride Month filter which included the caption, “Love has no age”.
Google adopted a similar line in marketing their “LGBTQ-friendly” business tag, which marks companies as allies of LGBTQ ideology and “safe spaces” for transgender people.
A promotional video for the Google business feature includes a voice-over which states, “Love is love. It takes no notice of age.”
Meanwhile, the entire “Drag Kid” phenomenon, which features pre-teen boys performing for adults while dressed as sexualised women, is being applauded and celebrated by mainstream media.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-22--It’s time to start calling this what it is: Pedophilia

VICE Canada is celebrating the next generation of drag queens with a video promoting a new documentary about preteen drag kids .
The documentary follows four young boys dressed as sexualised women parading about on stage for the entertainment of adults .
According to IMDB , the four children in the film are “ unafraid to hold their own in the adult world of competitive drag queens , voguing and lip-syncing.
” VICE ’ s Hilary Beaumont went behind the scenes as the young boys prepared for a show held at Toronto ’ s Glad Day Bookshop .
During preparations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to show off his new “ transparent dress ” .
Matt Walsh from The Daily Wire said , “ People who support and applaud this are pedophiles and should be treated as such.
” Referring to a story about Drag Kids last year , Jordan Peterson said : “ If you don ’ t see that this child is being exploited then ideology has possessed you to the core .
“ In what moral universe is it acceptable to encourage a 10-year-old boy to dress like an adult male mimicking a sexualized adult @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to fame and then claim it as virtue ?
” It ’ s time to start calling the Drag Kids phenomenon what it is : pedophilia .

By Caldron Pool
VICE Canada is celebrating the next generation of drag queens with a video promoting a new documentary about preteen drag kids.
The documentary follows four young boys dressed as sexualised women parading about on stage for the entertainment of adults.
According to IMDB, the four children in the film are “unafraid to hold their own in the adult world of competitive drag queens, voguing and lip-syncing.”
VICE’s Hilary Beaumont went behind the scenes as the young boys prepared for a show held at Toronto’s Glad Day Bookshop. During preparations, one of the boys is excited to show off his new “transparent dress”.
Matt Walsh from The Daily Wire said, “People who support and applaud this are pedophiles and should be treated as such.”
Referring to a story about Drag Kids last year, Jordan Peterson said: “If you don’t see that this child is being exploited then ideology has possessed you to the core.
“In what moral universe is it acceptable to encourage a 10-year-old boy to dress like an adult male mimicking a sexualized adult female, use that as a ticket to fame and then claim it as virtue?”
It’s time to start calling the Drag Kids phenomenon what it is: pedophilia.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-21--New York Times Says, Pedophilia Is ‘Not a Crime’

Yes , I also had to make sure it wasn ’ t a fake headline .
The New York Times really did publish an article titled , “ Pedophilia : A Disorder , Not a Crime.
” In the 2014 op-ed piece , it ’ s argued that 1 percent of the male population find themselves sexually attracted to prepubescent children .
So , if there are 159,410,000 males in the United States , that would mean there are approximately 1,594,100 male pedophiles throughout the nation .
The piece argues that there are harmful misconceptions when it comes to pedophilia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distinction should be made between child molestation as an act and pedophilia as a status .
“ One can live with pedophilia , ” the author says , “ and not act on it.
” Another apparent misconception is that pedophilia is a choice .
Baby , they were ‘ born that way.
’ The ‘ disorder ’ , the author says , may have neurological origins , because for instance , “ Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous , a finding that strongly suggests a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solution is always to end the stigma associated with pedophilia based on these “ misconceptions , ” and allow them to safely come forward and seek treatment to help manage urges and avoid committing crimes .
However , the author laments the fact that when it comes to public policies that might help pedophiles find treatment , the law omits pedophiles from protection .
The article says : “ The Americans With Disabilities Acts of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , education and medical care .
Congress , however , explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.
” For the author , “ it ’ s time to revisit these categorical exclusions .
Without legal protection , a pedophile can not risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support .
He could lose his job , and future job prospects , if he is seen at a group-therapy session , asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist , or requests a limit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime , ” the piece claimed .
The rationale here is that children are being sexually assaulted because the stigma associated with pedophilia prevents pedophiles from seeking help .
Therefore , it ’ s suggested that we put an end to the stigma by either viewing pedophilia as a disorder , or as others have argued , a sexual orientation .
But it ’ s hard to overstate the implications of defining pedophilia in such terms , as Alex @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Sexual orientation ’ is increasingly becoming a legally protected category .
In many parts , it ’ s prohibited to discriminate on the basis of ‘ sexual orientation ’ .
So , what would that mean for schools , daycares , or children ’ s hospitals when a person with a ‘ sexual orientation ’ toward pedophilia applies for a job ?
What we ’ re witnessing in our culture is the sidelining of God and the downward spiral of “ rationalised ” debauchery that follows .
With the Bible effectively rendered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” deemed an outdated concept , organisations , academics and teachers are feeling emboldened to operate outside the restraints of an objective moral standard , where absurdity reigns supreme .

By Ben Davis
Yes, I also had to make sure it wasn’t a fake headline. The New York Times really did publish an article titled, “Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime.”
In the 2014 op-ed piece, it’s argued that 1 percent of the male population find themselves sexually attracted to prepubescent children. So, if there are 159,410,000 males in the United States, that would mean there are approximately 1,594,100 male pedophiles throughout the nation.
The piece argues that there are harmful misconceptions when it comes to pedophilia. According to the author, a distinction should be made between child molestation as an act and pedophilia as a status. “One can live with pedophilia,” the author says, “and not act on it.”
Another apparent misconception is that pedophilia is a choice. Baby, they were ‘born that way.’ The ‘disorder’, the author says, may have neurological origins, because for instance, “Men with pedophilia are three times more likely to be left-handed or ambidextrous, a finding that strongly suggests a neurological cause.”
Of course, the solution is always to end the stigma associated with pedophilia based on these “misconceptions,” and allow them to safely come forward and seek treatment to help manage urges and avoid committing crimes.
However, the author laments the fact that when it comes to public policies that might help pedophiles find treatment, the law omits pedophiles from protection.
The article says: “The Americans With Disabilities Acts of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination against otherwise qualified individuals with mental disabilities, in areas such as employment, education and medical care. Congress, however, explicitly excluded pedophilia from protection under these two crucial laws.”
For the author, “it’s time to revisit these categorical exclusions. Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children.
“Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime,” the piece claimed.
The rationale here is that children are being sexually assaulted because the stigma associated with pedophilia prevents pedophiles from seeking help. Therefore, it’s suggested that we put an end to the stigma by either viewing pedophilia as a disorder, or as others have argued, a sexual orientation.
But it’s hard to overstate the implications of defining pedophilia in such terms, as Alex Newman of the Freedom Project noted.
‘Sexual orientation’ is increasingly becoming a legally protected category. In many parts, it’s prohibited to discriminate on the basis of ‘sexual orientation’. So, what would that mean for schools, daycares, or children’s hospitals when a person with a ‘sexual orientation’ toward pedophilia applies for a job?
What we’re witnessing in our culture is the sidelining of God and the downward spiral of “rationalised” debauchery that follows. With the Bible effectively rendered irrelevant in society, and “sin” deemed an outdated concept, organisations, academics and teachers are feeling emboldened to operate outside the restraints of an objective moral standard, where absurdity reigns supreme.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-21--SpaceX’s Starlink 5G Project Poses Immediate Threat of Extinction to Life on Earth – Report

SpaceX has previously rejected accusations from activists and said that its project would not have a significant environmental impact .
Facebook , Amazon , and other tech companies also plan to create their own satellite networks .
SpaceX ’ s Starlink project , which is designed to provide 5G service worldwide , poses an immediate threat of extinction to life on Earth , Arthur Firstenberg , an activist and author , told the Daily Star .
In an interview with the newspaper , he said that the satellites the company has already launched and those that it plans to launch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s exposure to radiation .
“ The Starlink satellites are located in the lowest layer of the magnetosphere , which is called the ionosphere .
The ionosphere , which is the source of energy for all life on earth , will be exposed to the full power of the satellite radiation instead of just a tiny fraction of the energy that goes through power lines located on the ground ” , Firstenberg told the Daily Star .
The activist claims that the current number of satellites already drastically affects life on earth , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of cancer cases and other diseases , as well as for the death of insects and the inability of birds to migrate .
“ We are effectively starved of oxygen ” , Firstenberg told the outlet .
The development comes as reports emerged that the Federal Communications Commission , which gave Elon Musk ’ s company a green light to launch thousands of satellites to provide 5G access worldwide , may have violated the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA ) , as it didn ’ t assess the project ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also concerned by SpaceX ’ s project , saying that the satellites already orbiting the Earth are hampering their work due to their brightness and how they move .
“ If there are lots and lots of bright moving objects in the sky , it tremendously complicates our job .
It potentially threatens the science of astronomy itself ” , said Dr James Lowenthal in an interview with The New York Times .
SpaceX has already launched 180 satellites and plans to increase this number to 1,400 by the end of the year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2027 .
By then , it hopes to have launched 42,000 satellites .

SpaceX has previously rejected accusations from activists and said that its project would not have a significant environmental impact. Facebook, Amazon, and other tech companies also plan to create their own satellite networks.
SpaceX’s Starlink project, which is designed to provide 5G service worldwide, poses an immediate threat of extinction to life on Earth, Arthur Firstenberg, an activist and author, told the Daily Star. In an interview with the newspaper, he said that the satellites the company has already launched and those that it plans to launch in the future will increase humanity’s exposure to radiation.
“The Starlink satellites are located in the lowest layer of the magnetosphere, which is called the ionosphere. The ionosphere, which is the source of energy for all life on earth, will be exposed to the full power of the satellite radiation instead of just a tiny fraction of the energy that goes through power lines located on the ground”, Firstenberg told the Daily Star.
The activist claims that the current number of satellites already drastically affects life on earth, as it is responsible for a high number of cancer cases and other diseases, as well as for the death of insects and the inability of birds to migrate. “We are effectively starved of oxygen”, Firstenberg told the outlet.
The development comes as reports emerged that the Federal Communications Commission, which gave Elon Musk’s company a green light to launch thousands of satellites to provide 5G access worldwide, may have violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as it didn’t assess the project’s potentially damaging environmental impact.
Astronomers are also concerned by SpaceX’s project, saying that the satellites already orbiting the Earth are hampering their work due to their brightness and how they move. “If there are lots and lots of bright moving objects in the sky, it tremendously complicates our job. It potentially threatens the science of astronomy itself”, said Dr James Lowenthal in an interview with The New York Times.
SpaceX has already launched 180 satellites and plans to increase this number to 1,400 by the end of the year. The company hopes to finish project in 2027. By then, it hopes to have launched 42,000 satellites.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-23--Dr. Lawrence Palevsky Testimony: Unvaccinated Children Are “The Healthiest Children I’ve Ever Seen”

It ’ s always worrisome publishing an article about vaccine safety and posting it on Facebook .
But why is that ?
One would think that discussions and concerns about vaccine safety would be encouraged .
However , the opposite is true–Facebook has been cracking down on any information that they deem as “ anti-vaccine.
” Does this mean that reporting on a study addressing the concerns of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines , for example , will be prevented from spreading and possibly even labelled as “ fake news , ” despite the fact that it ’ s been published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this mean that a paediatrician , like the one below , will also be censored for sharing his opinion based on his research and experience ?
I ’ d like to point out that many scientists presented facts about vaccines and vaccine safety at the recent Global Health Vaccine Safety Summit hosted by the World Health Organization in Geneva , Switzerland .
At the conference , Professor Heidi Larson , a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project , emphasized that doctors and professionals should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as “ anti-vax ” .
She recommended encouraging people to ask questions about vaccine safety .
After all , it makes sense–in order to make our vaccines safer and more effective , you would think everybody would be on board with constant questioning and examination .
After all , that ’ s just good science , and it ’ s in everyone ’ s best interest .
She also brought up the issue of confidence in vaccines : The other thing that ’ s a trend , and an issue , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of health care providers .
We have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines .
That ’ s a huge problem , because to this day any study I ’ ve seen–and we ’ re constantly looking on any studies in this space–still , the most trusted person on any study I ’ ve seen globally is the health care provider .
And if we lose that , we ’ re in trouble .
You can read more about the concerns brought up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detail , here .
One of those doctors who is losing confidence in vaccines is Dr. Lawrence Palevsky , a practicing paediatrician trained at the NYU School of Medicine who did his residency at Mt .
Sinai Hospital in New York .
He spent the first nine years of his career working in emergency rooms running a neonatal intensive care unit .
He recently spoke at a forum on vaccines in Connecticut , discussing the repeal of the religious exemption for childhood vaccines .
In the video below , he provides a great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and physicians continue to become concerned about vaccine safety .
The parents that I work with in New York , that I see around the country are very concerned that their rights are being taken away , that their knowledge about the science is being pushed away by an agenda that only says , unvaccinated children are a problem .
No study has every been done in this country , appropriately , to address the health outcomes of children who are vaccinated versus the children who are unvaccinated .
I have been seeing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years , that have opted out of vaccination , they are the healthiest children I ’ ve ever seen .
Vaccine hesitancy among among health professionals is no longer a secret .
A study published in the journal EbioMedicine outlines this point : Over the past two decades several vaccine controversies have emerged in various countries , including France , inducing worries about severe adverse effects and eroding confidence in health authorities , experts , and science .
These two dimensions are at the core of the vaccine hesitancy ( VH ) observed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defined as delay in acceptance of vaccination , or refusal , or even acceptance with doubts about its safety and benefits , with all these behaviors and attitudes varying according to context , vaccine , and personal profile , despite the availability of vaccine services VH presents a challenge to physicians who must address their patients ’ concerns about vaccines and ensure satisfactory vaccination coverage .
The scientific community should never stop questioning , especially when it comes to medication .
Based on the information that ’ s come out at the conference @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testimony shown above , it ’ s quite clear that there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to the development of vaccines and vaccine safety overall .
Discussion is always encouraging , as long as it ’ s peaceful and facts are presented in a proper manner .
It ’ s better to understand the reasons why a lot of people , parents , scientists and physicians are hesitant about vaccination and appropriately respond , instead of simply using ridicule and hatred , because that ’ s never effective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that way .
At the end of the day , scientists should never cease to question .

The Facts: Dr. Lawrence Palevsky, a NY licensed paediatrician, speaks at a forum on vaccines in Connecticut, discussing the repeal of the religious exemption for childhood vaccines.
Dr. Lawrence Palevsky, a NY licensed paediatrician, speaks at a forum on vaccines in Connecticut, discussing the repeal of the religious exemption for childhood vaccines. Reflect On: Why is vaccine hesitancy on the rise?
It’s always worrisome publishing an article about vaccine safety and posting it on Facebook. But why is that? One would think that discussions and concerns about vaccine safety would be encouraged. However, the opposite is true–Facebook has been cracking down on any information that they deem as “anti-vaccine.”
Does this mean that reporting on a study addressing the concerns of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, for example, will be prevented from spreading and possibly even labelled as “fake news,” despite the fact that it’s been published in a peer-reviewed medical journal?
Does this mean that a paediatrician, like the one below, will also be censored for sharing his opinion based on his research and experience?
Dr. Heidi Larson’s Comments at WHO Summit
I’d like to point out that many scientists presented facts about vaccines and vaccine safety at the recent Global Health Vaccine Safety Summit hosted by the World Health Organization in Geneva, Switzerland. At the conference, Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project, emphasized that doctors and professionals should forego name-calling with ‘hostile language’ such as “anti-vax”.
She recommended encouraging people to ask questions about vaccine safety. After all, it makes sense–in order to make our vaccines safer and more effective, you would think everybody would be on board with constant questioning and examination. After all, that’s just good science, and it’s in everyone’s best interest. She also brought up the issue of confidence in vaccines:
The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers. We have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem, because to this day any study I’ve seen–and we’re constantly looking on any studies in this space–still, the most trusted person on any study I’ve seen globally is the health care provider. And if we lose that, we’re in trouble.
You can read more about the concerns brought up by scientists at that conference, in detail, here.
Dr. Lawrence Palevsky
One of those doctors who is losing confidence in vaccines is Dr. Lawrence Palevsky, a practicing paediatrician trained at the NYU School of Medicine who did his residency at Mt. Sinai Hospital in New York. He spent the first nine years of his career working in emergency rooms running a neonatal intensive care unit. He recently spoke at a forum on vaccines in Connecticut, discussing the repeal of the religious exemption for childhood vaccines. In the video below, he provides a great summary as to why so many parents and physicians continue to become concerned about vaccine safety.
The parents that I work with in New York, that I see around the country are very concerned that their rights are being taken away, that their knowledge about the science is being pushed away by an agenda that only says, unvaccinated children are a problem. No study has every been done in this country, appropriately, to address the health outcomes of children who are vaccinated versus the children who are unvaccinated. I have been seeing families in my practice for over 20 years, that have opted out of vaccination, they are the healthiest children I’ve ever seen.
Vaccine hesitancy among among health professionals is no longer a secret. A study published in the journal EbioMedicine outlines this point:
Over the past two decades several vaccine controversies have emerged in various countries, including France, inducing worries about severe adverse effects and eroding confidence in health authorities, experts, and science. These two dimensions are at the core of the vaccine hesitancy (VH) observed in the general population. VH is defined as delay in acceptance of vaccination, or refusal, or even acceptance with doubts about its safety and benefits, with all these behaviors and attitudes varying according to context, vaccine, and personal profile, despite the availability of vaccine services VH presents a challenge to physicians who must address their patients’ concerns about vaccines and ensure satisfactory vaccination coverage.
The Takeaway
The scientific community should never stop questioning, especially when it comes to medication. Based on the information that’s come out at the conference mentioned in this article, and the testimony shown above, it’s quite clear that there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to the development of vaccines and vaccine safety overall. Discussion is always encouraging, as long as it’s peaceful and facts are presented in a proper manner.
It’s better to understand the reasons why a lot of people, parents, scientists and physicians are hesitant about vaccination and appropriately respond, instead of simply using ridicule and hatred, because that’s never effective and both parties cannot move forward that way. At the end of the day, scientists should never cease to question.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-23--Anonymous Operation Purge 2 0 The Unknown Will Make it Known CC 12 18 18 NA

Australian National Review ’ s community of readers and following is stronger than ever .
However , advertising revenues across @ @ @ @ @ especially without a paywall .
Will you help us remain a force for good and @ @ @ @ @ government and industry ?
At ANR , we are not affiliated with any big corporations @ @ @ @ @ government .
All we care about is unbiased and truthful reporting .
Also since Google @ @ @ @ @ other alternative news sites due to Google wanting only Fake News promoted by Mainstream Media @ @ @ @ @ truth .
We want to continue on our mission to enforce a free press , @ @ @ @ @ age where mainstream media and big corporations are going all out to suppress us .
@ @ @ @ @ donations we can ’ t fund ANR .
By supporting The Australian National Review with @ @ @ @ @ , you can help us ensure that everyone is informed of the truth and has @ @ @ @ @ years to come .

URGENT: JUST 7 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...


australiannationalreview--2020-06-23--Judges demand answers after children die in controversial cancer vaccine trial in India

• Tribal girls were given shots of cervical cancer vaccines during trial • Petitioners also asked judges to investigate trials of new drug Gardasil 9 • Drug has allegedly caused side-effects in children as young as nine • Investigation claims children were used as unwitting human guinea pigs • Supreme Court has given the government one month to provide answers Judges in India ’ s Supreme Court have demanded answers after children died during a controversial cervical cancer vaccine trial .
Young tribal girls received shots of pharmaceutical company Merck ’ s Gardasil vaccine and Cervarix , manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as young as nine in many countries – including the UK and the US – to protect against the human papilloma virus , one of the major causes of cervical cancer .
But the Indian court yesterday heard a challenge by campaigners who claim the study – funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – failed to obtain the informed consent of the children or their parents .
They say that a ‘ study ’ carried out for the foundation by a US organisation was in fact an illegal drugs trial .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ look into the way trials were conducted into Merck ’ s new cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil 9 .
A MailOnline investigation published earlier this month uncovered claims that children as young as nine suffered side-effects after being used as unwitting human guinea pigs for the new drug .
Gardasil 9 , which is expected to be worth £1.2 billion a year in sales , has already been approved for use in the US and could be available in the UK later in the year .
At a hearing of India ’ s Supreme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the country ’ s government had failed to provide answers to what had happened during the earlier trials of the original Gardasil and Cervarix .
They gave the government a month to explain what action had been taken to investigate and what efforts had been made to obtain the consent of those taking part in the trials .
They wanted to know whether there had been any follow-up or monitoring of the girls to see whether they had suffered adverse health consequences .
And the judges also ordered the government to produce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and compensation .
Lawyers for the campaigners who brought the case said they were pleased with the fact that , for the first time , liability and compensation for the victims had come up in court .
‘ It is a very encouraging development that the judges are now discussing accountability and not just accountability but also compensation , so the tone of the hearing today was very positive for us because it ’ s clear from all the parties , including from government reports , that there were , at best , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gross violations of fundamental human rights , ’ said Kerry McBroom , one of the lawyers .
An investigation by an Indian parliamentary committee had previously concluded that the trials amounted to a serious breach of trust and medical ethics amounting to child abuse and ‘ a clear cut violation of the human rights of these girl children and adolescents ’ .
The committee ’ s report said it had been established that clinical trials of the vaccines had been carried out ‘ under the pretext of an observation/demonstration project ’ in violation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the government for such trials .
The group accused of carrying out the trial under the ‘ pretext ’ of carrying out an academic study – PATH – said it ‘ strongly disagreed with the findings , conclusions , and tone of the released report and its disregard of the evidence and facts.
’ In court yesterday a bench of judges headed by Justice Dipak Misra criticised the Indian government for failing to act on the committee ’ s report .
‘ It should be the concern of [ the government ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ they said .
‘ Don ’ t leave the matter to court .
It is for the government to find out a way .
‘ If parliamentary committee has done something then it is obligatory for the executive government to take action on this report .
‘ File affidavit stating protocol to be followed by getting consent of people to undergo trial and the process to find out what is the effect of vaccination and whose liability is it to pay compensation.
’ Merck and GSK have both been ordered to respond @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yesterday ’ s hearing was told that Merck had provided a six volume document amounting to around 2,000 pages of evidence – but that GSK had so far failed to respond .
Both companies have denied any wrongdoing .
In court yesterday the judges also heard from lawyers for PATH – the US-based group that organised the ‘ study ’ – which emphasised the vaccines were safe and the vaccinations had been carried out in the interests of public health .
McBroom said she and her team would be referring to the latest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ submissions .
MailOnline ’ s investigation into Gardasil 9 revealed how several children used in those trials claimed to have suffered problems including weight loss , fatigue , dizziness and menstrual problems .
They and their parents maintained that they did not give their informed consent and that that they were not aware that they were taking part in the trial of an untested drug .
Among those who took part was 16-year-old Aman Dhawan , who lives in the Pancham Ki Phel slum in the city of Indore .
His family say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new medicine that would prevent a range of diseases , including malaria .
But Aman said that after he was given the vaccine he began to see changes in his body and he lost weight and strength .

By Gethin Chamberlain
Tribal girls were given shots of cervical cancer vaccines during trial
Children given Merck’s Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines
Petitioners also asked judges to investigate trials of new drug Gardasil 9
Drug has allegedly caused side-effects in children as young as nine
Investigation claims children were used as unwitting human guinea pigs
Supreme Court has given the government one month to provide answers
Judges in India’s Supreme Court have demanded answers after children died during a controversial cervical cancer vaccine trial.
Young tribal girls received shots of pharmaceutical company Merck’s Gardasil vaccine and Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline.
The vaccines are given to girls as young as nine in many countries – including the UK and the US – to protect against the human papilloma virus, one of the major causes of cervical cancer.
But the Indian court yesterday heard a challenge by campaigners who claim the study – funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – failed to obtain the informed consent of the children or their parents.
They say that a ‘study’ carried out for the foundation by a US organisation was in fact an illegal drugs trial.
Unaware: Aman Dhawan (pictured), 16, is one of many youngsters who took part in the trial without being aware they had been signed up to test Merck’s new Gardasil 9 drug, aimed at preventing cervical cancer
‘Guinea pig’: Sana Ansari, 19, her brother Mazhar and sister Asiya were all enrolled in the trial of Gardasil 9 drug – but she and her family say she had no idea she was testing the drug
The petitioners have also asked judges to look into the way trials were conducted into Merck’s new cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil 9.
A MailOnline investigation published earlier this month uncovered claims that children as young as nine suffered side-effects after being used as unwitting human guinea pigs for the new drug.
Gardasil 9, which is expected to be worth £1.2 billion a year in sales, has already been approved for use in the US and could be available in the UK later in the year.
At a hearing of India’s Supreme Court in Delhi yesterday judges expressed frustration that the country’s government had failed to provide answers to what had happened during the earlier trials of the original Gardasil and Cervarix.
They gave the government a month to explain what action had been taken to investigate and what efforts had been made to obtain the consent of those taking part in the trials.
They wanted to know whether there had been any follow-up or monitoring of the girls to see whether they had suffered adverse health consequences.
And the judges also ordered the government to produce an opinion on the issue of liability and compensation.
Side effects: Aman Dhawan, 16, from Indore, lost weight and strength after being enrolled in the Gardasil 9 trial, which he didn’t know he had signed up for either
Lawyers for the campaigners who brought the case said they were pleased with the fact that, for the first time, liability and compensation for the victims had come up in court.
‘It is a very encouraging development that the judges are now discussing accountability and not just accountability but also compensation, so the tone of the hearing today was very positive for us because it’s clear from all the parties, including from government reports, that there were, at best, serious irregularities and, at worst, gross violations of fundamental human rights,’ said Kerry McBroom, one of the lawyers.
An investigation by an Indian parliamentary committee had previously concluded that the trials amounted to a serious breach of trust and medical ethics amounting to child abuse and ‘a clear cut violation of the human rights of these girl children and adolescents’.
The committee’s report said it had been established that clinical trials of the vaccines had been carried out ‘under the pretext of an observation/demonstration project’ in violation of all laws and regulations laid down by the government for such trials.
The group accused of carrying out the trial under the ‘pretext’ of carrying out an academic study – PATH – said it ‘strongly disagreed with the findings, conclusions, and tone of the released report and its disregard of the evidence and facts.’
Injected: Mazhar Ansari (pictured), 18, who was enrolled in a trial of Merck’s new Gardasil 9 drug
Revealed: Whistleblower Dr Anand Rai (pictured), 37, lifted the lid on the scandal of illegal drugs trials in the city and now has been given an armed guard to protect him
In court yesterday a bench of judges headed by Justice Dipak Misra criticised the Indian government for failing to act on the committee’s report.
‘It should be the concern of [the government] that health of people is preserved,’ they said.
‘Don’t leave the matter to court. It is for the government to find out a way.
‘If parliamentary committee has done something then it is obligatory for the executive government to take action on this report.
‘File affidavit stating protocol to be followed by getting consent of people to undergo trial and the process to find out what is the effect of vaccination and whose liability is it to pay compensation.’
Merck and GSK have both been ordered to respond to the allegations made by campaigners.
Yesterday’s hearing was told that Merck had provided a six volume document amounting to around 2,000 pages of evidence – but that GSK had so far failed to respond.
Gardasil is now given to girls aged 12 and 13 as a vaccination against HPV, a sexually transmitted virus which causes most cases of cervical cancer
Both companies have denied any wrongdoing. In court yesterday the judges also heard from lawyers for PATH – the US-based group that organised the ‘study’ – which emphasised the vaccines were safe and the vaccinations had been carried out in the interests of public health.
McBroom said she and her team would be referring to the latest trials of Gardasil 9 in their closing submissions.
MailOnline’s investigation into Gardasil 9 revealed how several children used in those trials claimed to have suffered problems including weight loss, fatigue, dizziness and menstrual problems.
They and their parents maintained that they did not give their informed consent and that that they were not aware that they were taking part in the trial of an untested drug.
Among those who took part was 16-year-old Aman Dhawan, who lives in the Pancham Ki Phel slum in the city of Indore.
His family say they were told the drug was a new medicine that would prevent a range of diseases, including malaria.
But Aman said that after he was given the vaccine he began to see changes in his body and he lost weight and strength.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-24--Australia’s Agenda for the 21st Century

Australia’s Agenda for the 21st Century

United Nations ’ Agenda 21 is about to take the next meaningful step toward its end goal , global communism @ @ @ @ @ dots of how it is playing out , specifically in Australia .
Global technocratic dictatorship @ @ @ @


australiannationalreview--2020-06-24--Top CDC Official: ‘We’ll Just Get Rid of All Whites in the United States’ Who Refuse Vaccines

Gates Honored Doctor : “ We ’ ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States ” Chair of Advisory Committee on Immunizations floats racially-based depopulation plan op Center for Disease Control official was caught on tape in 2016 saying that society should “ get rid of of all the whites in the United States ” to reduce the number of people who refuse vaccines .
Dr. Carol Baker made the alarming remarks during the “ Achieving Childhood Vaccine Success in the U.S. ” panel discussion sponsored by the National Meningitis Association in New York City on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I have the solution .
Every study published in the last five years , when you look at vaccine refusers , ” Baker told the panel .
“ I ’ m not talking about…hesitance , most of them we can talk into coming to terms .
But refusers .
We ’ ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States…Guess who wants to get vaccinated the most ?
Immigrants.
” Notably , Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC ’ s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Obama ’ s Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2009 .
The Houston doctor was also honored with the Sabin Vaccine Institute ’ s 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a Washington D.C. ceremony sponsored “ in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Pfizer.
” Is it really that surprising a Bill Gates-connected CDC official openly suggested depopulating whites who don ’ t cooperate with their mandatory vaccine agenda ?

By Lockdown TV
Gates Honored Doctor: “We’ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States”
Chair of Advisory Committee on Immunizations floats racially-based depopulation plan op Center for Disease Control official was caught on tape in 2016 saying that society should “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” to reduce the number of people who refuse vaccines.
Dr. Carol Baker made the alarming remarks during the “Achieving Childhood Vaccine Success in the U.S.” panel discussion sponsored by the National Meningitis Association in New York City on May 9, 2016.
“So I have the solution. Every study published in the last five years, when you look at vaccine refusers,” Baker told the panel. “I’m not talking about…hesitance, most of them we can talk into coming to terms. But refusers. We’ll just get rid of all the whites in the United States…Guess who wants to get vaccinated the most? Immigrants.”
Notably, Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in 2009.
The Houston doctor was also honored with the Sabin Vaccine Institute’s 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a Washington D.C. ceremony sponsored “in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Pfizer.”
Is it really that surprising a Bill Gates-connected CDC official openly suggested depopulating whites who don’t cooperate with their mandatory vaccine agenda?


australiannationalreview--2020-06-24--China warns ‘the US will not come to Australia’s rescue’ during attack on Mike Pompeo

China has unleashed a warning to Australia to side with the communist super power over the United States after Sky News Australia aired an exclusive interview with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo .
China ’ s state-controlled media the Global Times says the US would abandon Australia if it needed rescuing .
“ Australia should realize that the US views it only as a lackey , ” the Global Times wrote .
“ The possibility that the US will not come to Australia ’ s rescue when needed is nothing new .
“ While the US maintains its global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of its allies , it does not offer any rewards.
” The article was critical of Mike Pompeo ’ s interview on Outsiders this Sunday where he raised significant concerns with Victoria ’ s Belt and Road deal with China .
“ I don ’ t know the nature of those projects precisely , but to the extent they have an adverse impact on our ability to protect telecommunications from our private citizens , or security networks for our defence and intelligence communities , we will simply disconnect , we will simply separate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re going to preserve trust in networks for important information .
We hope our friends and partners and allies across the world , especially our Five Eyes partners like Australia , will do the same.
” The Global Times said Mr Pompeo was only focused in the interest of America .
“ Obviously , what is on the mind of Pompeo and his likes is only US self-interests , and Washington is not going to foot the bill for the lost Australian jobs , ” the article said .
“ Australia is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face of wavering US policy .
Canberra is forced to pick a side between Beijing and the Washington even when it is loath to jeopardise its relationship with China .
”

By Sky News
China has unleashed a warning to Australia to side with the communist super power over the United States after Sky News Australia aired an exclusive interview with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
China’s state-controlled media the Global Times says the US would abandon Australia if it needed rescuing.
“Australia should realize that the US views it only as a lackey,” the Global Times wrote.
“The possibility that the US will not come to Australia’s rescue when needed is nothing new.
“While the US maintains its global hegemony by running roughshod over the interests of its allies, it does not offer any rewards.”
The article was critical of Mike Pompeo’s interview on Outsiders this Sunday where he raised significant concerns with Victoria’s Belt and Road deal with China.
“I don’t know the nature of those projects precisely, but to the extent they have an adverse impact on our ability to protect telecommunications from our private citizens, or security networks for our defence and intelligence communities, we will simply disconnect, we will simply separate,” he said.
“We’re going to preserve trust in networks for important information. We hope our friends and partners and allies across the world, especially our Five Eyes partners like Australia, will do the same.”
The Global Times said Mr Pompeo was only focused in the interest of America.
“Obviously, what is on the mind of Pompeo and his likes is only US self-interests, and Washington is not going to foot the bill for the lost Australian jobs,” the article said.
“Australia is already in a passive position in the face of wavering US policy. Canberra is forced to pick a side between Beijing and the Washington even when it is loath to jeopardise its relationship with China.”


australiannationalreview--2020-06-25--India Orders Its Military To Be Ready For War With China As Precaution If Negotiations Go Sour

India told its armed forces to make emergency procurements to stock up war reserves in the wake of escalating conflict with China .
( TMU ) – India told its armed forces on Monday to make emergency procurements to stock up its war reserves in the wake of escalating conflict with China along the Line Of Actual Control ( LAC ) , which is the long disputed border between India and China .
In addition , the India Navy has also been given the go-ahead to deploy its assets near the Malacca Strait , and , if needed , anywhere @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chinese , the India Economic Times reported .
This follows the first bloody conflict between the two Asian powers for the first time in 40 years with the killing of dozens of troops from India and China along a contested border of both countries in the Himalayas .
The situation spurred after a failed diplomatic meeting in Galwan River valley , which is in the Himalayas region of Ladakh .
The Times of India corroborated the Economic Times claims , stating that Indian forces are in a “ warlike alert.
” The Indian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seeking a go-ahead to purchase 33 fighter aircrafts from Russia , according to reports .
These will include 12 Sukhoi 30 MKI and 21 Mig-19 fighter jets .
TMU previously reported that both countries counterparts Wang Yi and Indian diplomat Subrahmanyam Jaishankar have now discussed the situation via a phone call with both coming to an agreement that the conflict needs to “ cool down.
” While things have thus far calmed down according to China , India is still on alert for potential war responses .
Hindustan Times also reports that China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government information websites and financial services like ATMs .
China stated the overall situation was “ stable and controllable , ” on Thursday through its Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian .
“ We believe that guided by the important consensus reached between the two leaders , China and India can properly deal with the current situation , jointly uphold peace and stability in the border areas , and ensure a sound and steady development of bilateral relations , ” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said at a press briefing .
Lijian added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ communication on solving the problems via diplomatic and military channels , the spokesperson told reporters .
“ As the world ’ s two largest developing countries and emerging economies , China and India have far more common interests than differences .
The two sides should follow the important consensus reached by leaders of the two countries and ensure that China-India relations move in the right direction in line with the interests and expectations of both nations , ” Zhao said .
However , China ’ s spokesperson still blamed India for the conflict @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happened because India ’ s frontline troops , in violation of the agreement reached at the Commander-level meeting , once again crossed the Line of Actual Control for deliberate provocation , and even violently attacked the Chinese officers and soldiers who went to the terrain for negotiation , thus triggering fierce physical conflicts and causing casualties , ” Zhao added .
According to Hindustan Times , Indian and Chinese delegations , led by major generals , met on Thursday near Patrol Point 14 in Galwan Valley as part of military engagements to de-fuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the seventh meeting between Major General Abhijit Bapat , commander of Karu-based headquarters 3 Infantry Division , and his Chinese counterpart since the stand-off began in early May , and the third after Monday night ’ s clash that left 20 Indian soldiers dead .
The Guardian reports that China released 10 Indian soldiers after an agreement on the release was reached at major general-level talks between the Indian Army and China ’ s People ’ s Liberation Army .
China further used its state-backed mouthpiece , the ‘ Global Times ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from China , Pakistan , and even Nepal on Wednesday if the border tensions escalated .
The Global Times quoted an individual at the Institute of International Relations of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences , Hu Zhiyong , in its one-sided and biased editorial , stating , “ India has engaged in border disputes with China , Pakistan and Nepal at the same time .
As Pakistan is a reliable strategic partner of China , and Nepal also has close ties with China , and both of them are key partners under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if India escalates border tensions , it could face military pressure from two or even three fronts , which is far beyond India ’ s military capability and this might lead to a disastrous defeat for India.
” Last Sunday , the Chinese People ’ s Liberation Army conducted military drills in high altitude conditions with tanks prior to the incident with India on Monday , The Diplomat reported .
NATO has responded with U.S. representative Kay Bailey Hutchison stating China is being watched by the West due to its growing aggression with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other territories like Taiwan .
Hutchison insisted that “ It ’ s much more on our radar screen , and I think it should be because we should assess the risk , hope for the best but prepare for the worst , ” Hutchison remarked that “ So we know that China has the capability to compete on a level playing field , and we ’ re asking them to do that , but we ’ re also turning a wary eye to their behavior right now in the South China Sea , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be done , as well as the clampdown on Hong Kong.
” When the representative was asked if an actual military confrontation was on the horizon , she replied , “ I think NATO is now looking to the East.
” A spokesperson for U.S. President Donald Trump has said he has “ no formal plans ” to mediate between India and China .
“ There are no formal plans , ” White House spokesman Kayleigh McEnany told reporters , but said Trump is “ aware ” and monitoring the tumultuous situation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Indian soldiers were killed in the brawl earlier this week , citing the toll from a military authority , while the casualties of the Chinese side remains unclear .
U.S. intelligence sources have , however , speculated that at least 35 soldiers were killed from China during the hand to hand combat dispute with iron rods , rocks and studded clubs .
However , while the conflict with China may be ending , another escalation has since happened with Pakistan .
When this was going to press , Pakistan accused India of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kashmir region , which resulted in the deaths of four civilians .
For a timeline update from the Indian side of the conflict with China see the Indian Economic Times here .

By DANNY RAZOR
India told its armed forces to make emergency procurements to stock up war reserves in the wake of escalating conflict with China.
(TMU) – India told its armed forces on Monday to make emergency procurements to stock up its war reserves in the wake of escalating conflict with China along the Line Of Actual Control (LAC), which is the long disputed border between India and China. In addition, the India Navy has also been given the go-ahead to deploy its assets near the Malacca Strait, and, if needed, anywhere else in the Indo-Pacific to counter the Chinese, the India Economic Times reported.
This follows the first bloody conflict between the two Asian powers for the first time in 40 years with the killing of dozens of troops from India and China along a contested border of both countries in the Himalayas. The situation spurred after a failed diplomatic meeting in Galwan River valley, which is in the Himalayas region of Ladakh.
The Times of India corroborated the Economic Times claims, stating that Indian forces are in a “warlike alert.” The Indian Air Force (IAF) is also seeking a go-ahead to purchase 33 fighter aircrafts from Russia, according to reports. These will include 12 Sukhoi 30 MKI and 21 Mig-19 fighter jets.
TMU previously reported that both countries counterparts Wang Yi and Indian diplomat Subrahmanyam Jaishankar have now discussed the situation via a phone call with both coming to an agreement that the conflict needs to “cool down.”
While things have thus far calmed down according to China, India is still on alert for potential war responses. Hindustan Times also reports that China has begun cyberattacks against Indian infrastructure including government information websites and financial services like ATMs.
China stated the overall situation was “stable and controllable,” on Thursday through its Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian.
“We believe that guided by the important consensus reached between the two leaders, China and India can properly deal with the current situation, jointly uphold peace and stability in the border areas, and ensure a sound and steady development of bilateral relations,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said at a press briefing.
Lijian added, the two sides are in close communication on solving the problems via diplomatic and military channels, the spokesperson told reporters.
“As the world’s two largest developing countries and emerging economies, China and India have far more common interests than differences. The two sides should follow the important consensus reached by leaders of the two countries and ensure that China-India relations move in the right direction in line with the interests and expectations of both nations,” Zhao said.
However, China’s spokesperson still blamed India for the conflict, stating:
“The whole thing happened because India’s frontline troops, in violation of the agreement reached at the Commander-level meeting, once again crossed the Line of Actual Control for deliberate provocation, and even violently attacked the Chinese officers and soldiers who went to the terrain for negotiation, thus triggering fierce physical conflicts and causing casualties,” Zhao added.
According to Hindustan Times, Indian and Chinese delegations, led by major generals, met on Thursday near Patrol Point 14 in Galwan Valley as part of military engagements to de-fuse tensions on the disputed border. This was the seventh meeting between Major General Abhijit Bapat, commander of Karu-based headquarters 3 Infantry Division, and his Chinese counterpart since the stand-off began in early May, and the third after Monday night’s clash that left 20 Indian soldiers dead.
The Guardian reports that China released 10 Indian soldiers after an agreement on the release was reached at major general-level talks between the Indian Army and China’s People’s Liberation Army. China further used its state-backed mouthpiece, the ‘Global Times’, to threaten India with military pressure from China, Pakistan, and even Nepal on Wednesday if the border tensions escalated.
The Global Times quoted an individual at the Institute of International Relations of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Hu Zhiyong, in its one-sided and biased editorial, stating, “India has engaged in border disputes with China, Pakistan and Nepal at the same time. As Pakistan is a reliable strategic partner of China, and Nepal also has close ties with China, and both of them are key partners under the China-proposed Belt and Road Initiative, if India escalates border tensions, it could face military pressure from two or even three fronts, which is far beyond India’s military capability and this might lead to a disastrous defeat for India.”
Last Sunday, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted military drills in high altitude conditions with tanks prior to the incident with India on Monday, The Diplomat reported.
NATO has responded with U.S. representative Kay Bailey Hutchison stating China is being watched by the West due to its growing aggression with its neighbors like Japan and India and other territories like Taiwan. Hutchison insisted that “It’s much more on our radar screen, and I think it should be because we should assess the risk, hope for the best but prepare for the worst,”
Hutchison remarked that “So we know that China has the capability to compete on a level playing field, and we’re asking them to do that, but we’re also turning a wary eye to their behavior right now in the South China Sea, militarizing islands that they said would never be done, as well as the clampdown on Hong Kong.”
When the representative was asked if an actual military confrontation was on the horizon, she replied, “I think NATO is now looking to the East.”
A spokesperson for U.S. President Donald Trump has said he has “no formal plans” to mediate between India and China.
“There are no formal plans,” White House spokesman Kayleigh McEnany told reporters, but said Trump is “aware” and monitoring the tumultuous situation.
Indian media reported a total of 20 Indian soldiers were killed in the brawl earlier this week, citing the toll from a military authority, while the casualties of the Chinese side remains unclear. U.S. intelligence sources have, however, speculated that at least 35 soldiers were killed from China during the hand to hand combat dispute with iron rods, rocks and studded clubs.
However, while the conflict with China may be ending, another escalation has since happened with Pakistan. When this was going to press, Pakistan accused India of “unprovoked” shelling fire in the disputed Kashmir region, which resulted in the deaths of four civilians.
For a timeline update from the Indian side of the conflict with China see the Indian Economic Times here.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-25--UN and moral crusaders think they can ‘tell Australia what to do’

Owen Media Relations managing director Michael Owen says “ the UN and moral crusaders think they can tell countries like @ @ @ @ @ doing ” .


australiannationalreview--2020-06-26--Makes sense now why Ted Talks included a talk suggesting “pedaphilia is a natural sexual orientation

Makes sense now why Ted Talks included a talk suggesting “ pedaphilia is a natural sexual orientation ” .
And by the way guess who funds Nambla who has been aggressively pushing this agenda ?
It ’ s bad enough this elite bunch of wankers such as Soros , Gates , Clinton ’ s and co have communist agenda ’ s , but are now pushing pedaphilia on the rest of society ?
Soros and co have been behind the Corona virus pandemic and causing chaos with funding Antifa ( a domestic terrorist organization ) to create violent “ black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disunity in society , and influence the upcoming US elections .
What ’ s really going on behind the scenes the masses aren ’ t yet awake to ?
Many warned about this but people didn ’ t listen .
Maybe the pedaphile ’ s in elite positions need the laws changed around “ pedaphilia to escape jail terms .
They are pushing for the age of consent to be lowered dramatically as we speak .
See my previous post how Twitter has changed their recent policy to allow pedaphilia as well .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushing pedaphilia ?
What about Disney cartoon shows depicting it ?
There is an agenda at foot driven by obviously those with significant financial resources and power .

By Jamie McIntyre
Makes sense now why Ted Talks included a talk suggesting “pedaphilia is a natural sexual orientation”.
And by the way guess who funds Nambla who has been aggressively pushing this agenda?
A Mr. George Soros
It’s bad enough this elite bunch of wankers such as Soros, Gates, Clinton’s and co have communist agenda’s, but are now pushing pedaphilia on the rest of society?
Soros and co have been behind the Corona virus pandemic and causing chaos with funding Antifa (a domestic terrorist organization) to create violent “black lives matter” protests designed to sow disunity in society, and influence the upcoming US elections.
What’s really going on behind the scenes the masses aren’t yet awake to?
Many warned about this but people didn’t listen.
Maybe the pedaphile’s in elite positions need the laws changed around “ pedaphilia to escape jail terms. They are pushing for the age of consent to be lowered dramatically as we speak.
See my previous post how Twitter has changed their recent policy to allow pedaphilia as well.
What about all the kids clothing lines pushing pedaphilia?
What about Disney cartoon shows depicting it?
There is an agenda at foot driven by obviously those with significant financial resources and power.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6661254/ted-talk-paedophilia-madeleine-van-der-bruggen/


australiannationalreview--2020-06-26--‘BREAK THE TABOO’ TEDx sparks outrage with talk urging people to SUPPORT paedophiles because ‘they c

‘BREAK THE TABOO’ TEDx sparks outrage with talk urging people to SUPPORT paedophiles because ‘they can get lonely’

A TEDx talk urging people to support paedophiles because they can get “ lonely ” has caused outrage .
US-based organizers are refusing to take it down from the group ’ s YouTube page – where it has had almost 20,000 views – despite growing criticism .
Campaigners and child abuse victims reacted furiously to the “ dangerous ” talk by Dutch psychologist Madeleine van der Bruggen , who argues society needs to “ break the taboo ” surrounding paedophilia .
She said : “ Most probably there will be someone in your environment , someone you know , someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like your football mate , maybe even your husband or son who is struggling with these sorts of feelings .
“ The only thing is you don ’ t know about it…most of these people know that they have feelings that they should repress .
“ But the problem is these people can ’ t talk about their feelings because they know that they will be hated for it .
“ I truly do believe that every person is longing for love at some point in their life .
“ And what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for will forever be impossible ?
“ That must be a really lonely situation to be in .
“ It ’ s like telling me , ‘ We know that you love your boyfriend and we don ’ t minimise that love , however you can not act out on it ever .
“ And on top of that you won ’ t be able to talk about it with anyone.
” Van der Bruggen , who advises the Dutch National Police on child abuse investigations , argued paedophilia is a sexual orientation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paedophiles “ do not offend ” .
The video on YouTube starts with the introduction : ‘ World changing ideas grow from misbehaving beautifully ’ She added : “ From an emotional point of view , I can kind of understand that you would want to eliminate these people from society .
“ However , it doesn ’ t make sense and that ’ s because we ’ re talking about biology .
“ We ’ re talking about a sexual orientation , something that we simply can not change .
They haven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So rather than letting our emotions rule , please , let ’ s be mature about this problem .
“ Now , how can we break the taboo ?
Well , first of all , let ’ s stop with hate.
” Child abuse campaigner Matan Uziel , who founded the Real Women Real Stories campaign group , said : “ In this twisted video , Ms van der Bruggen is trying to acclimatize people to paedophilia and weirdly and dangerously enough , TEDx allows it .
“ Paedophilia is not merely a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious psychiatric disorder .
“ Children are always harmed by being involved in premature sex acts for which they are neither fully physically , mentally , or emotionally ready .
“ I have been inundated with comments from victims of abuse who are angry and upset that TEDx allowed this to be aired .
“ We are calling for TEDx to remove the video from their YouTube channel immediately .
”

By Emma Parry
A TEDx talk urging people to support paedophiles because they can get “lonely” has caused outrage.
US-based organizers are refusing to take it down from the group’s YouTube page – where it has had almost 20,000 views – despite growing criticism.
Campaigners and child abuse victims reacted furiously to the “dangerous” talk by Dutch psychologist Madeleine van der Bruggen, who argues society needs to “break the taboo” surrounding paedophilia.
She said: “Most probably there will be someone in your environment, someone you know, someone like your neighbor, like your colleague, like your football mate, maybe even your husband or son who is struggling with these sorts of feelings.
“The only thing is you don’t know about it…most of these people know that they have feelings that they should repress.
“But the problem is these people can’t talk about their feelings because they know that they will be hated for it.
Madeleine van der Bruggen says that most paedophiles do not actually offend Credit: YouTube
The talk was organised by TEDx part of a non-profit that posts free talks online Credit: TEDx
“I truly do believe that every person is longing for love at some point in their life.
“And what if this love that you really wish for will forever be impossible?
“That must be a really lonely situation to be in.
“It’s like telling me, ‘We know that you love your boyfriend and we don’t minimise that love, however you cannot act out on it ever.
“And on top of that you won’t be able to talk about it with anyone.”
Van der Bruggen, who advises the Dutch National Police on child abuse investigations, argued paedophilia is a sexual orientation that people are born with and most paedophiles “do not offend”.
Credit: YouTube
The video on YouTube starts with the introduction: ‘World changing ideas grow from misbehaving beautifully’
Van der Bruggen says we need to stop being negative towards sex offenders Credit: YouTube
She added: “From an emotional point of view, I can kind of understand that you would want to eliminate these people from society.
“However, it doesn’t make sense and that’s because we’re talking about biology.
“We’re talking about a sexual orientation, something that we simply cannot change. They haven’t done anything wrong.
“So rather than letting our emotions rule, please, let’s be mature about this problem.
“Now, how can we break the taboo? Well, first of all, let’s stop with hate.”
Campaigner Matan Uziel has called for TEDx to remove the ‘dangerous’
TED said they had no plans to remove the video from YouTube
Child abuse campaigner Matan Uziel, who founded the Real Women Real Stories campaign group, said: “In this twisted video, Ms van der Bruggen is trying to acclimatize people to paedophilia and weirdly and dangerously enough, TEDx allows it.
“Paedophilia is not merely a sexual orientation. It is a very serious psychiatric disorder.
“Children are always harmed by being involved in premature sex acts for which they are neither fully physically, mentally, or emotionally ready.
“I have been inundated with comments from victims of abuse who are angry and upset that TEDx allowed this to be aired.
“We are calling for TEDx to remove the video from their YouTube channel immediately.”


australiannationalreview--2020-06-26--Faster national security response would have locked out the virus

The government is quite smug about containing the coronavirus pandemic .
By comparing the current level of infections against what could have been , they can claim they have successfully flattened the curve .
But there is another “ could have been ” story to be told .
And that story is one of an utter failure of imagination by policymakers and a catastrophic failure of political leadership together causing the needless trashing of the economy and the aspirations of millions of ordinary Australians .
That story begins last December when the first reports of an unusual pneumonia first surfaced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agencies , who watch for such phenomena everywhere in the world , would have taken a keen interest .
By early January , they would have been on alert – a likely new infectious respiratory disease , apparently contagious , apparently deadly and , ominously , coming from China , like so many new diseases before it .
The Five Eyes have long put the threat of a pandemic up there with the more traditional strategic threats to national security posed by China , Russia , North Korea , Iran and Islamic terrorism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coming from official Chinese sources , and also from the World Health Organisation .
Both China and the WHO have form .
Neither can be trusted .
Instead , the Five Eyes would have rapidly increased their own collection and analysis efforts on this likely new threat .
By the middle of January , Five Eyes analysts would have been asking , “ Is this the big one – the one we ’ ve worried about for so long , the deadly one to which there is no immunity , and which is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by late January , after further collection and analysis , they would have been reporting to their heads of government : “ This is the big one.
” We can be confident that , by the last weeks of January , the Prime Minister and our National Security Committee had been briefed on the certainty of the pandemic .
They had that knowledge at a time when there were no known cases in Australia , and it was still possible to lock our borders .
Given the clear and present danger , closing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the proper thing to do .
Had we closed our borders then , Australia could have created a virus-free bubble – the very thing we are aiming for now .
Inside that bubble , the economy and society would have continued to motor along , save for those components dependent on international travel , such as inbound tourism and international students .
We would have had some international arrivals , but these would have been placed in government-supervised quarantine before they were allowed into the bubble – the very thing we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the end of January , it would have likely cost us some hundreds of millions of dollars and a small hit to the economy .
Instead , we locked the whole country down in mid-March , racked up a bill of hundreds of billions of dollars , drove the economy into recession , and trashed the lives of millions of our citizens .
We have created a situation that is a thousand times worse than it needed to be – an unbelievable own goal .
So what went wrong ?
The answer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way the intel feeds into the policy domain .
The Health Department is the policy gatekeeper of most concern here .
Health seems to be chronically incapable of handling novel phenomena , as was seen over recent decades in its clumsy responses to SARS , MERS and avian flu .
More than a decade ago , the Health Department was supposed to develop a response plan for novel pandemics , but instead developed a traditional plan for an influenza pandemic .
And that plan kept the department in its comfort zone , focusing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bad flu season to smooth out the pressure on hospital resources .
It had little to say about keeping a novel virus out of the country in the first place .
We saw this mindset at work in February and March , with health officials arguing that everyone would get the virus and the key task was to slow the spread .
The Health Department lacked the imagination to handle something completely new , and so shoehorned its response to the novel coronavirus pandemic into its traditional influenza plan .
That failure of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political leadership when it was most needed .
Prime Minister Scott Morrison uncritically accepted the Health Department ’ s view of the situation rather than testing it against the evidence .
He failed to confront the novelty and the urgency of the crisis when it was put before him , and he failed to keep Australia free of the coronavirus when it was still possible to do so .
Given the thousand-fold difference in costs between what “ could have been ” if we had taken early decisive action , and the recession @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were given , the blame for the mess we are in can be apportioned thus : the coronavirus 0.1 per cent versus the government 99.9 per cent .

By Roger Bradbury | Contributor
The government is quite smug about containing the coronavirus pandemic. By comparing the current level of infections against what could have been, they can claim they have successfully flattened the curve.
But there is another “could have been” story to be told. And that story is one of an utter failure of imagination by policymakers and a catastrophic failure of political leadership together causing the needless trashing of the economy and the aspirations of millions of ordinary Australians.
That story begins last December when the first reports of an unusual pneumonia first surfaced in China. The Five Eyes intelligence agencies, who watch for such phenomena everywhere in the world, would have taken a keen interest.
By early January, they would have been on alert – a likely new infectious respiratory disease, apparently contagious, apparently deadly and, ominously, coming from China, like so many new diseases before it.
The Five Eyes have long put the threat of a pandemic up there with the more traditional strategic threats to national security posed by China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and Islamic terrorism.
They would have discounted the information coming from official Chinese sources, and also from the World Health Organisation. Both China and the WHO have form. Neither can be trusted.
Instead, the Five Eyes would have rapidly increased their own collection and analysis efforts on this likely new threat.
Given the clear and present danger, closing our borders at the end of January was the proper thing to do.
By the middle of January, Five Eyes analysts would have been asking, “Is this the big one – the one we’ve worried about for so long, the deadly one to which there is no immunity, and which is going to go pandemic?”
And by late January, after further collection and analysis, they would have been reporting to their heads of government: “This is the big one.”
We can be confident that, by the last weeks of January, the Prime Minister and our National Security Committee had been briefed on the certainty of the pandemic. They had that knowledge at a time when there were no known cases in Australia, and it was still possible to lock our borders.
Given the clear and present danger, closing our borders at the end of January was the proper thing to do. Had we closed our borders then, Australia could have created a virus-free bubble – the very thing we are aiming for now.
Inside that bubble, the economy and society would have continued to motor along, save for those components dependent on international travel, such as inbound tourism and international students.
We would have had some international arrivals, but these would have been placed in government-supervised quarantine before they were allowed into the bubble – the very thing we have now.
Had we closed the borders at the end of January, it would have likely cost us some hundreds of millions of dollars and a small hit to the economy.
Instead, we locked the whole country down in mid-March, racked up a bill of hundreds of billions of dollars, drove the economy into recession, and trashed the lives of millions of our citizens.
We have created a situation that is a thousand times worse than it needed to be – an unbelievable own goal.
So what went wrong?
The answer, I believe, lies in the way the intel feeds into the policy domain. The Health Department is the policy gatekeeper of most concern here. Health seems to be chronically incapable of handling novel phenomena, as was seen over recent decades in its clumsy responses to SARS, MERS and avian flu.
More than a decade ago, the Health Department was supposed to develop a response plan for novel pandemics, but instead developed a traditional plan for an influenza pandemic.
And that plan kept the department in its comfort zone, focusing on flattening the outbreak curves of a bad flu season to smooth out the pressure on hospital resources. It had little to say about keeping a novel virus out of the country in the first place.
We saw this mindset at work in February and March, with health officials arguing that everyone would get the virus and the key task was to slow the spread.
The Health Department lacked the imagination to handle something completely new, and so shoehorned its response to the novel coronavirus pandemic into its traditional influenza plan.
That failure of imagination was compounded by a failure of political leadership when it was most needed.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison uncritically accepted the Health Department’s view of the situation rather than testing it against the evidence.
He failed to confront the novelty and the urgency of the crisis when it was put before him, and he failed to keep Australia free of the coronavirus when it was still possible to do so.
Given the thousand-fold difference in costs between what “could have been” if we had taken early decisive action, and the recession, debt and smashed lives that we were given, the blame for the mess we are in can be apportioned thus: the coronavirus 0.1 per cent versus the government 99.9 per cent.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-26--Multiple Scientists:  CORONAVlRUS Altered in Lab to Better Attach to Humans

Multiple Scientists : C0R0NAVlRUS Altered in Lab to Better Attach to Humans Exclusive Information .
Multiple highly regarded scientists who @ @ @ @ @ the VlRUS has been manipulated in labs to better attach to human cells .
Turns @ @ @ @ @ very thing was conducted here in the United States until the research was banned in @ @ @ @ @ the research appears to have resumed through funding to several labs in China through payments @ @ @ @ @ We break down the timeline .


australiannationalreview--2020-06-27--How do you know the mainstream media is Influenced and controlled by “pedophile’s”

How do you know the mainstream media is Influenced and controlled by “ pedaphile ’ s ” How anyone can @ @ @ @ @ these media companies or consume their news is beyond me .
Where are the so @ @ @ @ @ in mainstream media ?
Not allowed to investigate the “ Cesspool ” that dictates your @ @ @ @ @ salaries and own you ?
Justice is coming , not just for the pedaphile ’ @ @ @ @ @ that protect them , yet don ’ t protect the children , for all those @ @ @ @ @ seek to destroy those who stand up for our human freedoms and want to make @ @ @ @ @ , yet protect and idolise those who have sold their souls , or have been @ @ @ @ @ quite .
Humans no longer have to tolerate or be enslaved by your bullshit .
@ @ @ @ @ an end .
The world has had enough .

By Jamie McIntyre
How do you know the mainstream media is Influenced and controlled by “pedaphile’s”
Because “Children’s lives clearly don’t matter”.
How anyone can work anymore for most of these media companies or consume their news is beyond me.
Where are the so called “Investigative journalists” in mainstream media?
Not allowed to investigate the “Cesspool” that dictates your editorials, that pay your salaries and own you?
Justice is coming, not just for the pedaphile’s but for all those that protect them, yet don’t protect the children, for all those that in the media that seek to destroy those who stand up for our human freedoms and want to make the world a better place, yet protect and idolise those who have sold their souls, or have been comprised and leveraged to keep quite.
Humans no longer have to tolerate or be enslaved by your bullshit.
Your time is coming to an end.
The world has had enough.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/2019/01/31/sex-trafficking-victims-children-state-care-missing/2730139002/


australiannationalreview--2020-06-27--The Federal Reserve is Getting Desperate

In a sign that the Federal Reserve is growing increasingly desperate to jump-start the economy , the Fed ’ s Secondary Market Credit Facility has begun purchasing individual corporate bonds .
The Secondary Market Credit Facility was created by Congress as part of a corona virus stimulus bill to purchase as much as 750 billion dollars of corporate credit .
Until last week , the Secondary Market Credit Facility had limited its purchases to exchange-traded funds , which are bundled groups of stocks or bonds .
The bond purchasing initiative , like all Fed initiatives , will fail to produce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy by increasing the money supply and thus lowering interest rates , which are the price of money .
In this case , the Fed ’ s purchase of individual corporate bonds enables select corporations to pursue projects for which they could not otherwise have obtained funding .
This distorts signals sent by the market , making these companies seem like better investments than they actually are and thus allowing these companies to attract more private investment .
This will cause these companies to experience a Fed-created bubble .
Like all Fed-created bubbles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ burst , causing businesses to collapse , investors to lose their money ( unless they receive a government bailout ) , and workers to lose their jobs .
Under the law creating the lending facilities , the Fed does not have to reveal the purchases made by the new facilities .
Instead of allowing the Fed to hide this information , Congress should immediately pass the Audit the Fed bill so people can know whether a company is flush with cash because private investors determined it is a sound investment or because the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its bonds .
The Fed could , and likely will , use this bond buying program to advance political goals .
The Fed could fulfill Chairman Jerome Powell ’ s stated desire to do something about climate change by supporting “ green energy ” companies .
The Fed could also use its power to reward businesses that , for example , support politically correct causes , refuse to sell guns , require their employees and customers to wear masks , or promote unquestioning obedience to the warfare state .
Another of the new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bonds of cash-strapped state and local governments .
This could allow the Fed to influence the policies of these governments .
It is not wise to reward spendthrift politicians with a federal bailout — whether through Congress or through the Fed .
With lending facilities providing to the Federal Reserve the ability to give money directly to businesses and governments , the Fed is now just one step away from implementing Ben Bernanke ’ s infamous suggestion that , if all else fails , the Fed can drop money from a helicopter .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Instead , they will make the inevitable crash more painful .
The next crash can bring about the end of the fiat monetary system .
The question is not if the current monetary system ends , but when .
The only way Congress can avoid the Fed causing another great depression is to begin transitioning to a free-market monetary system by auditing , then ending , the Fed .

By Ron Paul
In a sign that the Federal Reserve is growing increasingly desperate to jump-start the economy, the Fed’s Secondary Market Credit Facility has begun purchasing individual corporate bonds. The Secondary Market Credit Facility was created by Congress as part of a corona virus stimulus bill to purchase as much as 750 billion dollars of corporate credit. Until last week, the Secondary Market Credit Facility had limited its purchases to exchange-traded funds, which are bundled groups of stocks or bonds.
The bond purchasing initiative, like all Fed initiatives, will fail to produce long-term prosperity. These purchases distort the economy by increasing the money supply and thus lowering interest rates, which are the price of money. In this case, the Fed’s purchase of individual corporate bonds enables select corporations to pursue projects for which they could not otherwise have obtained funding. This distorts signals sent by the market, making these companies seem like better investments than they actually are and thus allowing these companies to attract more private investment. This will cause these companies to experience a Fed-created bubble. Like all Fed-created bubbles, the corporate bond bubble will eventually burst, causing businesses to collapse, investors to lose their money (unless they receive a government bailout), and workers to lose their jobs.
Under the law creating the lending facilities, the Fed does not have to reveal the purchases made by the new facilities. Instead of allowing the Fed to hide this information, Congress should immediately pass the Audit the Fed bill so people can know whether a company is flush with cash because private investors determined it is a sound investment or because the Fed chose to “invest” in its bonds.
The Fed could, and likely will, use this bond buying program to advance political goals. The Fed could fulfill Chairman Jerome Powell’s stated desire to do something about climate change by supporting “green energy” companies. The Fed could also use its power to reward businesses that, for example, support politically correct causes, refuse to sell guns, require their employees and customers to wear masks, or promote unquestioning obedience to the warfare state.
Another of the new lending facilities is charged with purchasing the bonds of cash-strapped state and local governments. This could allow the Fed to influence the policies of these governments. It is not wise to reward spendthrift politicians with a federal bailout — whether through Congress or through the Fed.
With lending facilities providing to the Federal Reserve the ability to give money directly to businesses and governments, the Fed is now just one step away from implementing Ben Bernanke’s infamous suggestion that, if all else fails, the Fed can drop money from a helicopter. These interventions will not save the economy. Instead, they will make the inevitable crash more painful. The next crash can bring about the end of the fiat monetary system. The question is not if the current monetary system ends, but when. The only way Congress can avoid the Fed causing another great depression is to begin transitioning to a free-market monetary system by auditing, then ending, the Fed.


australiannationalreview--2020-06-29--Facial recognition technology being trialled in Australian schools | Nine News Australia

Looplearn ’ s facial recognition technology is being trialled in five schools across Australia , to mark the classroom roll @


australiannationalreview--2020-06-29--For those wanting to help make the world a better place then I’m sure you’ll agree we need independe

For those wanting to help make the world a better place then I ’ m sure you ’ ll agree we need independent media .
One way you can help is support the not for profit new site I founded back in 2013 in Melbourne Australia Originally a print newspaper in newsagents , not now solely online .
We lost our 10,000 Facebook followers to help spread the various news articles when our account was stolen and Facebook did nothing to assist in getting it back .
If you support what we are doing please like the Facebook page and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contributors , donations and sponsors / advertisers to help grow our Australian and Global presence .
Immediately after I founded the Australian National Review in 2013 I was attacked by Government agencies and relentlessly pursued plus Character assassinated by certain factions of dodgy mainstream media .
It ’ s cost me tens of millions of dollars in losses but I still believe in the mission to expose the lies in main stream media and Australian National Review is Australia ’ s first real free and independent press , one with no editorial control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account .
News with a difference that will be educational , compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world .
What price are you willing to pay to defend the undefended and to make the world a better place ?
For now liking our Face book and sharing articles of interest from www.australiannationalreview.com helps .
If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 9.95 per month ) or donate whatever you can afford or maybe become a sponsor for as little as $ 1000 or advertise from $ 500 it will help drive its mission .

By Jamie McIntyre
For those wanting to help make the world a better place then I’m sure you’ll agree we need independent media.
One way you can help is support the not for profit new site I founded back in 2013 in Melbourne Australia
Originally a print newspaper in newsagents, its now solely online.
We lost our 10,000 Facebook followers to help spread the various news articles when our account was stolen and Facebook did nothing to assist in getting it back.
If you support what we are doing please like the Facebook page and share it
We are after non paid contributors, donations and sponsors/advertisers to help grow our Australian and Global presence.
Immediately after I founded the Australian National Review in 2013 I was attacked by Government agencies and relentlessly pursued plus Character assassinated by certain factions of dodgy mainstream media.
It’s cost me tens of millions of dollars in losses but I still believe in the mission to expose the lies in mainstream media and
Australian National Review is Australia’s first real free and independent press, one with no editorial control by the elite, but a publication that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account.
News with a difference that will be educational, compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world.
What price are you willing to pay to defend the undefended and to make the world a better place?
For now liking our Face book and sharing articles of interest from www.australiannationalreview.com helps.
If you can become a paid subscriber (only $9.95 per month) or donate whatever you can afford or maybe become a sponsor for as little as $1000 or advertise from $500 it will help drive its mission.
https://www.facebook.com/AustralianNationalReview/