australiannationalreview--2020-04-16--Prime Minister pivots to an early exit

Prime Minister pivots to an early exit

The truth is that we are fortunate this pandemic carries a relatively low fatality rate .
It serves as a priceless dress rehearsal for that future juncture when a much more deadly pathogen emerges that presents an existential threat to the survival of our species .
One area where Australia was already prudently prepared – much more so than perhaps any other country – has been in the domain of financial system resilience .
It is a tremendous credit to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority ( APRA ) that it forced our banks to become the best-capitalised deposit-takers in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as this .
On an “ internationally-harmonised ” basis , CBA ’ s 17.5 per cent common equity tier one ( CET1 ) capital ratio ranks above any other large bank globally according to its latest results presentation .
( ANZ is third , Westpac fourth , and NAB tenth . )
The “ unquestionably strong ” core equity buffers our banks have accumulated since 2014 protect creditors from losses in the event that loan losses spike .
These reserves have been augmented by a sharp increase in conservatism across the financial system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and substantially enhanced the quality of their lending standards .
On Tuesday , APRA announced that it is encouraging banks to modulate dividend payments to shareholders as a precaution to ensure lenders do not unnecessarily consume capital while they are seeking to support credit creation across the economy during this time of need .
APRA has been conspicuous in not blindly following its ( inferior ) regulatory peers overseas by banning dividends outright , which is necessary in jurisdictions where banks have been myopically allowed to operate on skinnier capital ratios .
Three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ half-year results over the next month , with CBA presenting its full-year numbers in August .
It is possible one major bank , which is focused on capital generation , defers its half-year dividend to its full-year release .
Two others could materially reduce their half-year payments .
CBA is in the strongest position with around $ 4 billion in excess capital and is certain to look after the hundreds of thousands of retirees who own CBA shares for the attractive yield .
Retaining profits and enhancing capital is demonstrably positive for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Queensland announced that it was repaying its $ 150 million Wholesale Capital Notes hybrid security that was due to be called in May with APRA ’ s explicit approval .
BoQ noted that it would issue a replacement security once market conditions stabilise .
This is important given there was some apprehension that BoQ would not meet expectations , and follows the trend set by other banks , including Macquarie and NAB , which repaid about $ 1.74 billion of their hybrids in March ( again with APRA ’ s approval ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up issuing replacement hybrids .
Likewise , Westpac repaid a $ 1.1 billion Tier 2 subordinated bond last month without issuing a successor security .
And , finally , Challenger has secured APRA approval to repay its CGFPA hybrid at a future quarterly distribution date when conditions normalise and it is able to launch a replacement instrument .
All of this makes perfect sense .
The banks could potentially issue new debt and hybrid securities right now if they really had to , but it would be heinously expensive , pushing up their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be passed on to business and household borrowers in the form of higher lending rates .
At a time when the banks are seeking to act as one of “ Team Australia ’ s ” shock absorbers through a deep , albeit temporary , crisis , this would be completely counterproductive .
One issue we have been interrogating is how bad the crisis could get , and what it means for loan losses and the banks ’ capital ratios .
Put a little differently , we have tried to blow up the banks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this stress-testing of all institutions , including the likes of non-banks such as Challenger .
Challenger is different to a bank because it is required to mark-to-market both its assets ( eg , bonds ) and its liabilities ( ie , annuities ) .
People often assume that because Challenger is suffering mark-to-market losses on its assets , it is going to get into trouble .
But asset losses are negated somewhat by reductions in the value of its liabilities .
And this mark-to-market discipline means that Challenger tends to be a much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that takes a “ hold-to-maturity ” approach to asset pricing that does not reflect valuation changes unless the loan goes into arrears .
This is evidenced in a recent toggle in Challenger ’ s asset holdings away from equities and high-yield bonds , which was pleasing to see .
When we run shocks worse than the global financial crisis over Challenger ’ s balance sheet , it is surprisingly difficult to construct scenarios that result in it needing to raise a lot of new equity .
In APRA ’ s latest published stress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regulator assumed a scenario in which house prices fall 35 per cent and the unemployment rate increases to around 11 per cent , among other adverse inputs .
APRA found that average bank capital ratios only fell by around 3 percentage points , which would reduce the major banks ’ CET1 ratios from 11 per cent to about 8 per cent .
This is importantly well above the 5.125 per cent CET1 threshold at which point the bank ’ s hybrid securities are converted into equity .
It was also a change from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ banks were not as well capitalised .
We have run a range of even more challenging scenarios , including a recession that is assumed to be 25 per cent worse than the 1991 downturn when the banks ’ bad and doubtful debt ( BDD ) charges soared to almost 3 per cent ( specifically , 263 basis points ) of their gross loans in 1992 .
That is almost 10 times worse than the peak losses assumed by Standard & Poor ’ s in its downside modelling and multiples the losses APRA ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the major banks were much less risk-averse and far more free-wheeling with their lending standards .
They also did not have government-guaranteed deposits or access to special emergency lending facilities via the RBA ’ s Committed Liquidity Facility .
And they did not pay over $ 1 billion in annual taxes to the government for the implicit public guarantee on their senior bonds ( via the wholesale liability levy ) , which S & P recognises with a two-notch rating upgrade to AA- .
When my team jacks up loan losses to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the experience between 1990 and 1993 , they find that the banks ’ CET1 ratios still bottom out in the 6.3 per cent to 7.8 per cent range at their nadir .
While APRA ’ s hard-nosed approach to deleveraging the banks since 2014 has been tough for shareholders to bear via lower returns on equity , it has bequeathed depositors and creditors the safest banks in the world .

The truth is that we are fortunate this pandemic carries a relatively low fatality rate. It serves as a priceless dress rehearsal for that future juncture when a much more deadly pathogen emerges that presents an existential threat to the survival of our species.
One area where Australia was already prudently prepared – much more so than perhaps any other country – has been in the domain of financial system resilience. It is a tremendous credit to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) that it forced our banks to become the best-capitalised deposit-takers in the world in anticipation of a shock such as this.
On an “internationally-harmonised” basis, CBA’s 17.5 per cent common equity tier one (CET1) capital ratio ranks above any other large bank globally according to its latest results presentation. (ANZ is third, Westpac fourth, and NAB tenth.)
Loan protection
The “unquestionably strong” core equity buffers our banks have accumulated since 2014 protect creditors from losses in the event that loan losses spike. These reserves have been augmented by a sharp increase in conservatism across the financial system as banks divested riskier, non-core businesses and substantially enhanced the quality of their lending standards.
On Tuesday, APRA announced that it is encouraging banks to modulate dividend payments to shareholders as a precaution to ensure lenders do not unnecessarily consume capital while they are seeking to support credit creation across the economy during this time of need.
APRA has been conspicuous in not blindly following its (inferior) regulatory peers overseas by banning dividends outright, which is necessary in jurisdictions where banks have been myopically allowed to operate on skinnier capital ratios.
Three of the four major banks report their half-year results over the next month, with CBA presenting its full-year numbers in August. It is possible one major bank, which is focused on capital generation, defers its half-year dividend to its full-year release. Two others could materially reduce their half-year payments. CBA is in the strongest position with around $4 billion in excess capital and is certain to look after the hundreds of thousands of retirees who own CBA shares for the attractive yield.
Retaining profits and enhancing capital is demonstrably positive for all bank creditors. On Tuesday, Bank of Queensland announced that it was repaying its $150 million Wholesale Capital Notes hybrid security that was due to be called in May with APRA’s explicit approval. BoQ noted that it would issue a replacement security once market conditions stabilise.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison.
This is important given there was some apprehension that BoQ would not meet expectations, and follows the trend set by other banks, including Macquarie and NAB, which repaid about $1.74 billion of their hybrids in March (again with APRA’s approval), even though they did not end up issuing replacement hybrids.
Likewise, Westpac repaid a $1.1 billion Tier 2 subordinated bond last month without issuing a successor security. And, finally, Challenger has secured APRA approval to repay its CGFPA hybrid at a future quarterly distribution date when conditions normalise and it is able to launch a replacement instrument.
All of this makes perfect sense. The banks could potentially issue new debt and hybrid securities right now if they really had to, but it would be heinously expensive, pushing up their funding costs, which would have to be passed on to business and household borrowers in the form of higher lending rates. At a time when the banks are seeking to act as one of “Team Australia’s” shock absorbers through a deep, albeit temporary, crisis, this would be completely counterproductive.
Stress tests
One issue we have been interrogating is how bad the crisis could get, and what it means for loan losses and the banks’ capital ratios. Put a little differently, we have tried to blow up the banks’ balance sheets. We regularly do this stress-testing of all institutions, including the likes of non-banks such as Challenger.
Challenger is different to a bank because it is required to mark-to-market both its assets (eg, bonds) and its liabilities (ie, annuities). People often assume that because Challenger is suffering mark-to-market losses on its assets, it is going to get into trouble.
But asset losses are negated somewhat by reductions in the value of its liabilities. And this mark-to-market discipline means that Challenger tends to be a much more price-sensitive capital allocator than a bank that takes a “hold-to-maturity” approach to asset pricing that does not reflect valuation changes unless the loan goes into arrears. This is evidenced in a recent toggle in Challenger’s asset holdings away from equities and high-yield bonds, which was pleasing to see.
When we run shocks worse than the global financial crisis over Challenger’s balance sheet, it is surprisingly difficult to construct scenarios that result in it needing to raise a lot of new equity.
In APRA’s latest published stress test of bank balance sheets, the regulator assumed a scenario in which house prices fall 35 per cent and the unemployment rate increases to around 11 per cent, among other adverse inputs. APRA found that average bank capital ratios only fell by around 3 percentage points, which would reduce the major banks’ CET1 ratios from 11 per cent to about 8 per cent. This is importantly well above the 5.125 per cent CET1 threshold at which point the bank’s hybrid securities are converted into equity. It was also a change from stress tests in prior years when the banks were not as well capitalised.
Safest banks in the world
We have run a range of even more challenging scenarios, including a recession that is assumed to be 25 per cent worse than the 1991 downturn when the banks’ bad and doubtful debt (BDD) charges soared to almost 3 per cent (specifically, 263 basis points) of their gross loans in 1992. That is almost 10 times worse than the peak losses assumed by Standard & Poor’s in its downside modelling and multiples the losses APRA’s stress test projected.
In 1991, the major banks were much less risk-averse and far more free-wheeling with their lending standards. They also did not have government-guaranteed deposits or access to special emergency lending facilities via the RBA’s Committed Liquidity Facility. And they did not pay over $1 billion in annual taxes to the government for the implicit public guarantee on their senior bonds (via the wholesale liability levy), which S&P recognises with a two-notch rating upgrade to AA-.
When my team jacks up loan losses to levels that are 25 per cent worse than the experience between 1990 and 1993, they find that the banks’ CET1 ratios still bottom out in the 6.3 per cent to 7.8 per cent range at their nadir. While APRA’s hard-nosed approach to deleveraging the banks since 2014 has been tough for shareholders to bear via lower returns on equity, it has bequeathed depositors and creditors the safest banks in the world.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-16--Hillary Clinton must testify in email case, judge rules

A federal judge Monday ordered Hillary Clinton to testify at a deposition for a lawsuit related to her use of a private email computer server for official business while working as secretary of State in the Obama administration .
The order to answer questions from lawyers for the conservative advocacy group Judicial Watch pours yet more fuel on the longstanding fire of controversy over Clinton ’ s private server .
That controversy arguably dealt her Democratic candidacy for the White House in 2016 a fatal blow , and helped elect Donald Trump president .
“ It is time to hear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Royce Lamberth said in his order issued in U.S. District Court in Washington , D.C. , where Judicial Watch is suing the State Department over its handling of searches for Clinton ’ s emails .
“ As extensive as the existing record is , it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton ’ s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business , ” Lamberth wrote .
Lamberth ’ s order on Monday limits questioning of Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ private server and her understanding of State ’ s records management obligations.
” The judge barred Judicial Watch ’ s lawyers from questioning Clinton and her former chief of staff at State , Cheryl Mills , about the preparation of talking points for then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice ’ s Sept. 16 , 2012 , media appearances about the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi , Libya .
No date has yet been scheduled for Clinton ’ s deposition .

No date has yet been scheduled for Clinton’s deposition.
The judge barred Judicial Watch’s lawyers from questioning Clinton and her former chief of staff at State, Cheryl Mills, about the preparation of talking points for then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice’s Sept. 16, 2012, media appearances about the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya.
Lamberth’s order on Monday limits questioning of Clinton to “her reasons for using a private server and her understanding of State’s records management obligations.”
“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth wrote.
“It is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton,” Judge Royce Lamberth said in his order issued in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., where Judicial Watch is suing the State Department over its handling of searches for Clinton’s emails.
That controversy arguably dealt her Democratic candidacy for the White House in 2016 a fatal blow, and helped elect Donald Trump president.
The order to answer questions from lawyers for the conservative advocacy group Judicial Watch pours yet more fuel on the longstanding fire of controversy over Clinton’s private server .
A federal judge Monday ordered Hillary Clinton to testify at a deposition for a lawsuit related to her use of a private email computer server for official business while working as secretary of State in the Obama administration.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said in an interview, “We’re pleased to finally be able to depose her directly on this.”
Fitton said that testimony from others has revealed that Clinton was cautioned “half a dozen times about these issues” related to her use of a private email server while leading the State Department from 2009 to early 2013.
The Justice Department, which is representing the State Department in the case, had no immediate comment.
Clinton’s use of a private email server while serving as America’s top diplomat was, at best, problematic because it for some time effectively shielded the emails on it from being disclosed via Freedom of Information Act requests by the media and others.
Some critics said Clinton had violated government record retention laws in her use of the server. Another concern was the use of the email server to send messages that contained classified information.
The FBI investigated Clinton’s use of a server. In July 2016, while Clinton was running for president, then-FBI Director James Comey publicly announced that he was not recommending that any criminal charges be filed against Clinton. But Comey also said that she had been “extremely careless” in using the server.
In late October 2016, shortly before the presidential election, Comey revealed to Congress that the FBI was reviewing emails from the server that had been newly discovered. The public disclosure of that probe so close to the election outraged Democrats.
The political analysis site FiveThirtyEight said in 2017 that Comey’s disclosure “probably cost Clinton the election” because “it upended the news cycle and soon halved Clinton’s lead in the polls, imperiling her position in the Electoral College.”
No charges were ever lodged in connection with the emails referenced in Comey’s letter.
Fitton on Monday noted that Lamberth’s order reveals irritation by the judge in how the State Department has handled the case. In fact, Lamberth’s ruling refers to “State’s mishandling of this case — which was either the result of bureaucratic incompetence or motivated by bad faith.”
Lamberth in late 2018 ordered that the State Department release information to Judicial Watch on the questions of whether Clinton’s use of private email “was an intentional attempt to evade” Freedom of Information Act disclosure requirements, and whether the department adequately searched for records that were responsive to Judicial Watch’s request.
The judge also ordered the disclosure of evidence related to the question of whether the department’s efforts to settle the case five years ago “amounted to bad faith” because of a possible desire to avoid the private server coming to light.
Monday’s order by Lamberth points out, in a footnote, that Judicial Watch recently told the judge about a newly obtained Clinton email that the group said “strongly suggests” that Clinton and her then-deputy chief of staff, Huma Abedin, “conducted State Department business via text messaging as well.”
Lamberth wrote that the State Department “has not provided any information about whether such text messages were searched pursuant to FOIA.”
“We don’t have any Hillary Clinton text messages,” Fitton said.
Correction: The U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, was attacked in September 2012. An earlier version misstated its status.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-16--How President Trump Is Exposing a Corrupt Technocracy

Continuing my series on President Trump ’ s handling of the coronavirus pandemic , today , I ’ ll explain the hidden goal he may have in mind as he deals with medical experts in his daily press briefings .
Previous messages on this subject can be found here , here , and here .
A humorous but well-reasoned analysis of the drama surrounding the pandemic can be found here .
Let me begin by saying that the coronavirus pandemic is a serious medical issue .
Hundreds of thousands of people have died from the disease .
My intent is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suffering of its victims or mock the pain of their loved ones .
My aim is to shed light on how the pandemic has been weaponized by corrupt people and how the President is countering this agenda .
Many people struggle to rightly understand the President ’ s words and actions because they take what he says or what he does at face value without considering the strategy behind them .
There is very little that Trump does or says that doesn ’ t have a larger , concealed strategy in mind .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to occupy the White House .
When he argued with Congress for two years over funding for the border wall , he wasn ’ t hoping to get money from Congress for the wall .
He knew Democrats in Congress would never agree to fund the wall .
His goal was to publicly expose their desire to flood our nation with drugs and illegal immigrants .
Trump planned to fund the wall with the Defense Department budget the entire time , a fact revealed by Q nine months before the President publicly mentioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hundred more examples where Trump appeared to be doing one thing while he was actually doing something else .
The greatest mistake you can make is assuming his real goals are in plain view .
And that is the mistake Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx made when they agreed to host daily updates with POTUS .
One of the President ’ s main strategic goals is the exposure and removal of corruption .
One corrupt component that must be dealt with is the deep state .
A second is the dishonest and corrupt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ element to consider .
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx are representatives of the medical establishment .
While organizations like the National Institutes of Health , the Centers for Disease Control , and the World Health Organization provide a service to society , they are part of the medical branch of a technocracy that makes decisions that deeply affect our lives .
tech·noc·ra·cy /tekˈnäkrəsē/ 1 .
The control of society or industry by an elite group of technical experts .
There are many examples of how an elite technocracy holds power over us .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ hard-earned money in support of the Paris Climate Accord , an agreement between nations that has the stated goal of reducing carbon emissions .
Dr. Shiva explained in this video how the Paris Climate Accord is a scam designed to enrich politicians at the expense of taxpayers while doing nothing to reduce carbon emissions .
We don ’ t dare dispute the views of climate scientists lest we risk being called “ science deniers.
” Express your belief that the deep state exists and the media will label you a “ conspiracy theorist.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll accuse you of using “ alternative facts.
” The technocracy remains in power by claiming to have superior knowledge and denigrating anyone who opposes them .
President Trump , in his daily briefings , is exposing the corrupt tactics and ineptitude of medical technocrats .
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx rely on their medical expertise .
They believe it puts them in a position of superiority in relation to POTUS .
What they didn ’ t account for is the fact that even before he became President , Trump has had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of intelligence in the world .
He knows his deficiencies and he compensates for them by gleaning information from people who are experts in their fields .
Why did he strongly ( and publicly ) support the unproven idea that hydroxychloroquine would be an effective treatment for Covid-19 ?
Do you think he just pulled that idea out of thin air ?
A more likely explanation is that he spoke with a doctor ( or several doctors ) who had used hydroxychloroquine for other strains of the coronavirus , and they advised him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being the best treatment for Covid-19 .
This is just speculation , but it ’ s consistent with the way Trump operates .
He seldom takes a poorly-calculated risk .
Regardless of how Trump came to support hydroxychloroquine , the fact that he made the right call on it while the experts have gotten so many things wrong .
Their predictions on mortality and morbidity have been an abject failure , making Trump appear to be the more well-informed party .
Despite abundant evidence to the contrary , as late as January 14th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was no evidence of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 , echoing the report issued by the Chinese government .
Trump has used this erroneous report to illustrate problems with the World Health Organization .
He is now hinting that he may cut funding to them .

By: prayingmedic
Continuing my series on President Trump’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic, today, I’ll explain the hidden goal he may have in mind as he deals with medical experts in his daily press briefings. Previous messages on this subject can be found here, here, and here. A humorous but well-reasoned analysis of the drama surrounding the pandemic can be found here.
Let me begin by saying that the coronavirus pandemic is a serious medical issue. Hundreds of thousands of people have died from the disease. My intent is not to dismiss the reality of the suffering of its victims or mock the pain of their loved ones. My aim is to shed light on how the pandemic has been weaponized by corrupt people and how the President is countering this agenda.
Many people struggle to rightly understand the President’s words and actions because they take what he says or what he does at face value without considering the strategy behind them. There is very little that Trump does or says that doesn’t have a larger, concealed strategy in mind. POTUS may be the savviest strategist ever to occupy the White House.
When he argued with Congress for two years over funding for the border wall, he wasn’t actually hoping to get money from Congress for the wall. He knew Democrats in Congress would never agree to fund the wall. His goal was to publicly expose their desire to flood our nation with drugs and illegal immigrants. Trump planned to fund the wall with the Defense Department budget the entire time, a fact revealed by Q nine months before the President publicly mentioned the idea.
Praying Medic @prayingmedic Replying to @prayingmedic 21) I believe Trump signed the spending bill because it fully funds the military which #QAnon and POTUS have repeatedly said are a top priority. They rely on the military to offset the work of the deep state and they can’t afford to lose them right now. Praying Medic @prayingmedic 22) Red_Castle
It’s just a guess, but the Army Corps of Engineers has as their symbol, a red and white castle.
Is Trump planning to build the border wall using Defense Department money and the corps of engineers?#Qanonhttps://www.usace.army.mil/ 243 people are talking about this
I could cite a hundred more examples where Trump appeared to be doing one thing while he was actually doing something else. The greatest mistake you can make is assuming his real goals are in plain view. And that is the mistake Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx made when they agreed to host daily updates with POTUS.
One of the President’s main strategic goals is the exposure and removal of corruption. One corrupt component that must be dealt with is the deep state. A second is the dishonest and corrupt media complex.
Donald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump I am working hard to expose the corruption and dishonesty in the Lamestream Media. That part is easy, the hard part is WHY? 154K people are talking about this
There is a third element to consider. Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx are representatives of the medical establishment. While organizations like the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, and the World Health Organization provide a service to society, they are part of the medical branch of a technocracy that makes decisions that deeply affect our lives.
tech·noc·ra·cy
/tekˈnäkrəsē/
noun
1. The control of society or industry by an elite group of technical experts.
There are many examples of how an elite technocracy holds power over us. Taxpayers have been forced to surrender their hard-earned money in support of the Paris Climate Accord, an agreement between nations that has the stated goal of reducing carbon emissions. Dr. Shiva explained in this video how the Paris Climate Accord is a scam designed to enrich politicians at the expense of taxpayers while doing nothing to reduce carbon emissions.
We don’t dare dispute the views of climate scientists lest we risk being called “science deniers.” Express your belief that the deep state exists and the media will label you a “conspiracy theorist.” Dispute their reporting, and they’ll accuse you of using “alternative facts.” The technocracy remains in power by claiming to have superior knowledge and denigrating anyone who opposes them. President Trump, in his daily briefings, is exposing the corrupt tactics and ineptitude of medical technocrats.
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx rely on their medical expertise. They believe it puts them in a position of superiority in relation to POTUS. What they didn’t account for is the fact that even before he became President, Trump has had access to some of the best sources of intelligence in the world. He knows his deficiencies and he compensates for them by gleaning information from people who are experts in their fields. Why did he strongly (and publicly) support the unproven idea that hydroxychloroquine would be an effective treatment for Covid-19?
Do you think he just pulled that idea out of thin air?
A more likely explanation is that he spoke with a doctor (or several doctors) who had used hydroxychloroquine for other strains of the coronavirus, and they advised him to put all his money on it being the best treatment for Covid-19. This is just speculation, but it’s consistent with the way Trump operates. He seldom takes a poorly-calculated risk.
Regardless of how Trump came to support hydroxychloroquine, the fact that he made the right call on it while the experts have gotten so many things wrong. Their predictions on mortality and morbidity have been an abject failure, making Trump appear to be the more well-informed party.
Despite abundant evidence to the contrary, as late as January 14th, the World Health Organization claimed there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19, echoing the report issued by the Chinese government. Trump has used this erroneous report to illustrate problems with the World Health Organization. He is now hinting that he may cut funding to them.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-16--Barr disappointed by partisan attacks leveled at President Trump, says media on a ‘jihad’ against hy

Barr disappointed by partisan attacks leveled at President Trump, says media on a ‘jihad’ against hydroxychloroquine

Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox .
Sign up here .
Attorney General William Barr told “ The Ingraham Angle ” Wednesday that he was disappointed over the partisan attacks leveled against President Trump during the coronavirus pandemic and blasted reporters for waging a “ jihad ” to discredit the effectiveness of the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine .
“ It ’ s very disappointing because I think the president went out at the beginning of [ the coronavirus pandemic ] and really was statesmanlike , trying to bring people together , working with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Keeping his patience as he as he got these snarky , gotcha questions from the White House media pool and the stridency of the partisan attacks on him has gotten higher and higher.
” DR. FAUCI : ‘ WE ’ RE STARTING TO SEE GLIMMERS OF HOPE ‘ BUT DISTANCING STRATEGIES MUST BE ‘ INTENSIFIED ’ Barr ’ s criticism toward the media sharpened when he addressed the coverage of hydroxychloroquine and its possible role in the fight against the coronavirus .
He said before the president mentioned the drug , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but as soon as Trump mentioned it , “ the media has been on a jihad to discredit the drug , ” Barr said .
“ It ’ s quite strange.
” Host Laura Ingraham asked Barr about the possibility of extending the shutdown and its impact on the country .
Barr said a depression would make the health care system “ weaker.
” “ We can not keep for a long period of time our economy shut down just on the public health thing .
It means less cancer .
Cancer researchers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the disease reaches researchers who will save lives in the future .
That ’ s being held in abeyance , ” Barr said .
“ The money that goes into these institutions , whether philanthropic sources or government sources , is going to be reduced .
We will have a weaker health care system if we go into a deep depression .
So it just measured it in lives .
The cure can not be worse than the disease.
” CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP The attorney general lamented the loss @ @ @ @ @ @ @ saying after the 30-day period the U.S. needs to “ find a way ” to allow businesses to adapt .
“ But when you think of everything else , generations of families who have built up businesses for generations in this country and recent immigrants who have built up businesses , snuffed out .
Small businesses that may not be able to come back if this goes on too long , ” Barr said .
“ So we have to find , after the 30-day period , we have to find a way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ situation and figure out how they can best get started .
”

By Victor Garcia | Fox News
Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here.
Attorney General William Barr told “The Ingraham Angle” Wednesday that he was disappointed over the partisan attacks leveled against President Trump during the coronavirus pandemic and blasted reporters for waging a “jihad” to discredit the effectiveness of the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine.
“It’s very disappointing because I think the president went out at the beginning of [the coronavirus pandemic] and really was statesmanlike, trying to bring people together, working with all the governors,” Barr said. “Keeping his patience as he as he got these snarky, gotcha questions from the White House media pool and the stridency of the partisan attacks on him has gotten higher and higher.”
DR. FAUCI: ‘WE’RE STARTING TO SEE GLIMMERS OF HOPE ‘ BUT DISTANCING STRATEGIES MUST BE ‘INTENSIFIED’
Barr’s criticism toward the media sharpened when he addressed the coverage of hydroxychloroquine and its possible role in the fight against the coronavirus. He said before the president mentioned the drug, the media was fair in its coverage but as soon as Trump mentioned it, “the media has been on a jihad to discredit the drug,” Barr said. “It’s quite strange.”
Host Laura Ingraham asked Barr about the possibility of extending the shutdown and its impact on the country. Barr said a depression would make the health care system “weaker.”
“We cannot keep for a long period of time our economy shut down just on the public health thing. It means less cancer. Cancer researchers or at home. A lot of the disease reaches researchers who will save lives in the future. That’s being held in abeyance,” Barr said. “The money that goes into these institutions, whether philanthropic sources or government sources, is going to be reduced. We will have a weaker health care system if we go into a deep depression. So it just measured it in lives. The cure cannot be worse than the disease.”
CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP
The attorney general lamented the loss of family businesses during the shutdown, saying after the 30-day period the U.S. needs to “find a way” to allow businesses to adapt.
“But when you think of everything else, generations of families who have built up businesses for generations in this country and recent immigrants who have built up businesses, snuffed out. Small businesses that may not be able to come back if this goes on too long,” Barr said. “So we have to find, after the 30-day period, we have to find a way of allowing businesses to adapt to this situation and figure out how they can best get started.”


australiannationalreview--2020-04-16--The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19

The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19

In the following , Ethan Nash examines links between COVID-19 ‘ solutions ’ and social eugenics movements , including Bill Gates Snr and Planned Parenthood , the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions , vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic .
In the late 19th century — a critical time in development of the sciences — British scholar Sir Francis Galton , in his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development , coined the term ‘ eugenics ’ .
Galton , whose cousin was Charles Darwin , hoped to ‘ better humankind ’ through the ‘ science of improving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people with specific desirable hereditary traits .
Decades of research on ‘ controlled breeding ’ , including through means of sterilization , soon became accepted mainstream science at the turn of the century and the eugenics movement was born .
Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness , criminal tendencies and even poverty , and that these conditions can be ‘ bred out ’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization .
Not surprisingly , ‘ undesirable ’ traits were concentrated in poor , uneducated and minority populations .
Many professionals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researched ways to ‘ improve the human race ’ through means of eliminating these ‘ negative traits ’ , and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia .
As we have explored , the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoria played a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ” lethal chamber ” to euthanise what these groups called ” the grosser types of our mental defectives ” .
Following World War I , numerous eugenics-based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ across the world .
However , after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept , the world grew sour and a new change was needed to continue .
The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II , rather , they went underground or and were reinvented by assuming more “ compassionate ” guises .
Julian Huxley ’ s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements .
During @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eugenics as ‘ socially progressive ’ , with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘ solutions ’ to poverty and disease .
The Rockefeller Foundation heavily financed the modern eugenics movement and think-tanks such as the Tavistock Institute would give birth to many influential individuals and ‘ social ’ organisations .
Huxley adeptly associated the ‘ new and modern ’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies , such as the popularisation of birth control , the decriminalisation of homosexuality and abortion law reform .
He described @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The basic premise remained the same , however : it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering , than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering .
These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves .
A plethora of new-age organisations and movements would arise during the era of ‘ counter-culture ’ , and this ‘ progression ’ continued , the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture .
The key to understanding Bill Gates ’ exposure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family past .
Bill Gates ’ father , William H. Gates , Sr. , was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis .
He also presided over many bar associations , organisation boards and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century .
Importantly , Gates Sr. served on the board of Planned Parenthood ( PP ) during the group ’ s infancy — a re-branded organisation birthed out of the American Eugenics Society .
The company spread from beginnings in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Long Island and Berlin , to today become one of the largest organisations in the US .
Rockefeller-Bayar Co. , BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group .
Make no mistake : Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘ preserve ’ humanity and who sought to ‘ beautify ’ countries by stopping the “ unfit ” from reproducing .
In their 2014 Annual Report , the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clinical visits , including 324,000 abortions .
The group claims to be a proponent of ‘ free choice ’ , yet it is a eugenics front organisation in disguise .
Planned Parent has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months , after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women ’ s health .
Does this sound like a group that dedicated to improving society ?
This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth : promoting ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a cover .
Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father ’ s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood , which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “ reckless breeders ” .
Gates ’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day .
William Gates Snr .
would continue his eugenicist efforts by becoming instrumental in the formation of a new philanthropic brainchild called the William H. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like Planned Parenthood , would first focus on ‘ improving ’ reproductive and child health in the developing world .
After pioneering philanthropist activities , the company merged with the new Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000 .
The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement , however the objective remains the same .
This time , the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world .
These activities have given birth to new forms of technological , eugenic endeavours .
The organisation is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world ’ s systems , including in the areas of technology , medicine and now agriculture .
In 2010 , the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $ 23 million .
This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eradicating ’ disease and feeding the world ’ s poor .
The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades , as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows .
Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘ answer ’ to world hunger , but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War .
Melinda Gates has also made ‘ women ’ s issues ’ one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This includes the decision to elevate contraception-promotion and population control as “ arguably the single-most important part of her work ” .
She has been openly criticised for these moves .
In 2017 , the Gates Foundation pledged another $ 375 million for ‘ family planning ’ , with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world , particularly in developing countries .
This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren ’ t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists : the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don ’ t know what ’ s good for them .
As such , they need to be educated and ‘ encouraged ’ with large-scale , foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion .
Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family , influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world , let ’ s explore the relatable picture .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time .
For 25 years , he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus , Microsoft , and made himself one of the richest men in the world .
The tech world was largely born through Gates .
He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology , but by taking existing technology , adapting it to a ‘ specific market ’ , and then dominating that market .
In recent years , Gates has turned a good deal of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ private foundation in the world , with over $ 46 billion in assets .
He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett , and is primarily dedicated to ‘ enhancing healthcare ’ and ‘ alleviating poverty ’ across the world .
Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines , as well as ‘ forecasting ’ international health challenges of tomorrow ( such as preparing for epidemics ) , and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine-manufacturing process , including quality control and clinical evaluation .
This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘ advise ’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs : Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster , ‘ better ’ and cheaper , in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created , shared and retained .
Some examples of this include : • Streamlining the schedule and dosing of vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partner in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization ( GAVI ) , which has now grown a substantial portfolio of public-private international health partnerships that are committed to increasing access to immunisation .
Today , GAVI has grown significantly .
The group brings together developing country and donor governments ( including Australia ) , the World Health Organization , UNICEF , the World Bank , the vaccine industry , research and technical agencies , civil society and other private philanthropists .
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $ 1.56 billion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ period as of March 2019 , and continues to advise the group on key business decisions .
Gates heavy involvement in the vaccine industry , in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘ social ’ reformation , was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter .
Considered a ‘ hero ’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases , the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘ go to ’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out .

By
In the following, Ethan Nash examines links between COVID-19 ‘solutions’ and social eugenics movements, including Bill Gates Snr and Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions, vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic.
THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT
In the late 19th century — a critical time in development of the sciences — British scholar Sir Francis Galton, in his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development, coined the term ‘eugenics’.
Galton, whose cousin was Charles Darwin, hoped to ‘better humankind’ through the ‘science of improving the human species’ by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits.
Decades of research on ‘controlled breeding’, including through means of sterilization, soon became accepted mainstream science at the turn of the century and the eugenics movement was born.
Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions can be ‘bred out’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization. Not surprisingly, ‘undesirable’ traits were concentrated in poor, uneducated and minority populations.
Many professionals in the scientific and biological fields rigorously researched ways to ‘improve the human race’ through means of eliminating these ‘negative traits’, and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia.
As we have explored, the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoria played a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ”lethal chamber” to euthanise what these groups called ”the grosser types of our mental defectives”.
Following World War I, numerous eugenics-based ideologies were beginning to enter mainstream societies across the world. However, after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept, the world grew sour and a new change was needed to continue.
CULTURAL MARXISM
The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II, rather, they went underground or and were reinvented by assuming more “compassionate” guises.
Julian Huxley’s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements.
During the 1950s, these groups would re-define eugenics as ‘socially progressive’, with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘solutions’ to poverty and disease.
The Rockefeller Foundation heavily financed the modern eugenics movement and think-tanks such as the Tavistock Institute would give birth to many influential individuals and ‘social’ organisations.
Huxley adeptly associated the ‘new and modern’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies, such as the popularisation of birth control, the decriminalisation of homosexuality and abortion law reform. He described this process as “eugenic modernisation”.
The basic premise remained the same, however: it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering, than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering.
These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves.
A plethora of new-age organisations and movements would arise during the era of ‘counter-culture’, and this ‘progression’ continued, the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture.
BILL GATES SNR AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Photo: WUM
The key to understanding Bill Gates’ exposure to eugenic concepts is to trace his family past.
Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr., was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis. He also presided over many bar associations, organisation boards and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century.
Importantly, Gates Sr. served on the board of Planned Parenthood (PP) during the group’s infancy — a re-branded organisation birthed out of the American Eugenics Society.
The company spread from beginnings in Cold Spring Harbor genetics and virology labs on Long Island and Berlin, to today become one of the largest organisations in the US. Rockefeller-Bayar Co., BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group.
Make no mistake: Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘preserve’ humanity and who sought to ‘beautify’ countries by stopping the “unfit” from reproducing.
In their 2014 Annual Report, the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over 2.5 million patients in over 4 million clinical visits, including 324,000 abortions. The group claims to be a proponent of ‘free choice’, yet it is a eugenics front organisation in disguise.
Planned Parent has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months, after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women’s health.
Does this sound like a group that dedicated to improving society? This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth: promoting ‘women’s health’ was always a cover.
Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders”.
Gates’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day.
THE GATES FOUNDATION
William Gates Snr. would continue his eugenicist efforts by becoming instrumental in the formation of a new philanthropic brainchild called the William H. Gates Foundation in 1994.
The group, like Planned Parenthood, would first focus on ‘improving’ reproductive and child health in the developing world. After pioneering philanthropist activities, the company merged with the new Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000.
The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement, however the objective remains the same. This time, the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF.
Today, the group is focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world. These activities have given birth to new forms of technological, eugenic endeavours.
The organisation is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine and now agriculture.
In 2010, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than ‘eradicating’ disease and feeding the world’s poor.
The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades, as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows. Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘answer’ to world hunger, but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War.
Melinda Gates has also made ‘women’s issues’ one of the top priorities for their philanthropic work. This includes the decision to elevate contraception-promotion and population control as “arguably the single-most important part of her work”. She has been openly criticised for these moves.
In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged another $375 million for ‘family planning’, with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries.
This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren’t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking.
The fact that couples in developing countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists: the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don’t know what’s good for them. As such, they need to be educated and ‘encouraged’ with large-scale, foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion.
Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family, influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world, let’s explore the relatable picture.
BILL GATES AND VACCINES
Bill Gates needs no introduction. He is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time. For 25 years, he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus, Microsoft, and made himself one of the richest men in the world. The tech world was largely born through Gates.
He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology, but by taking existing technology, adapting it to a ‘specific market’, and then dominating that market.
In recent years, Gates has turned a good deal of his attention towards philanthropy by creating the largest private foundation in the world, with over $46 billion in assets. He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett, and is primarily dedicated to ‘enhancing healthcare’ and ‘alleviating poverty’ across the world.
Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines, as well as ‘forecasting’ international health challenges of tomorrow (such as preparing for epidemics), and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases.
He has spent years involved in the vaccine-manufacturing process, including quality control and clinical evaluation. This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘advise’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs:
Source: B&MGF
Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, ‘better’ and cheaper, in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created, shared and retained. Some examples of this include:
Adaptive trial designs.
Streamlining the schedule and dosing of vaccines.
Novel delivery formats for vaccines.
Modular, automated manufacturing platforms enabling small-batch vaccine production.
The billionaire was an early investing partner in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), which has now grown a substantial portfolio of public-private international health partnerships that are committed to increasing access to immunisation.
Today, GAVI has grown significantly. The group brings together developing country and donor governments (including Australia), the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, civil society and other private philanthropists.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $1.56 billion to the alliance’s 2016-2020 strategic period as of March 2019, and continues to advise the group on key business decisions.
Gates heavy involvement in the vaccine industry, in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘social’ reformation, was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter.
Considered a ‘hero’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases, the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘go to’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-16--NEWSTucker BLASTS Fauci for Wild Suggestion Americans May Have to Carry COVID Papers

In America , there has been a divided response over the pandemic .
Some red states like South Dakota have taken a really hands-off approach while states like California have put statewide shelter orders .
Fox News host Tucker Carlson declared that “ Our leaders chose the Chinese model .
With every passing day , their response becomes more restrictive : Requests that people stay indoors have become orders .
People are being fined and arrested for driving alone , playing catch in the park and paddle boarding on the ocean.
” He then put forward a question that most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these measures keeping us safe ?
The short answer is , we don ’ t know that they are .
As noted , we still don ’ t know much of anything .
We ’ re definitely not encouraged to ask about it .
Now , Dr , Anthony Fauci , the de facto “ face of coronavirus response ” is now floating the idea of using internal passports , which Carlson believes is “ a feature of life familiar to the population of mainland China : Internal passports.
” When asked about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That ’ s possible .
It ’ s one of those things that we talk about when we want to make sure we know who the vulnerable people are .
This is something that ’ s being discussed , I think it might actually have some merit under certain circumstances.
” The Fox News highlighted the examples of Michigan and Vermont , which have taken heavy-handed measures to combat the virus : In Michigan , Democratic Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer has ordered the few stores still open to fence off areas that offer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Whitmer considers these “ non-essential ” items , so she ’ s prohibiting their sale .
The governor of Vermont has issued similar orders for stores there .
Other places will doubtless follow their lead .
What ’ s the rationale for this ?
Wouldn ’ t closing off more sections of a store increase crowding in the areas that remain open ?
Carlson has been a voice of reason throughout the Trump administration .
He understands the dangers of globalism and why it ’ s not in the best interests of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ free trade.
” At the same time , Americans shouldn ’ t have to give up their freedoms and livelihoods because of the political class ’ s errors — Such as opening up trade with China .
When it ’ s all said and done , Carlson will be remembered as one of the greatest voices for American nationalism in the 21st century

In America, there has been a divided response over the pandemic. Some red states like South Dakota have taken a really hands-off approach while states like California have put statewide shelter orders.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson declared that “Our leaders chose the Chinese model. With every passing day, their response becomes more restrictive: Requests that people stay indoors have become orders. People are being fined and arrested for driving alone, playing catch in the park and paddle boarding on the ocean.”
He then put forward a question that most politicians refuse to answer:
How are these measures keeping us safe? The short answer is, we don’t know that they are. As noted, we still don’t know much of anything. We’re definitely not encouraged to ask about it.
Now, Dr, Anthony Fauci, the de facto “face of coronavirus response” is now floating the idea of using internal passports, which Carlson believes is “a feature of life familiar to the population of mainland China: Internal passports.”
When asked about this proposal, Fauci said, “That’s possible. It’s one of those things that we talk about when we want to make sure we know who the vulnerable people are. This is something that’s being discussed, I think it might actually have some merit under certain circumstances.”
Carlson painted the following scenario:
Your papers, please. Imagine a country where illegal immigrants can work, drive, get welfare, and vote, all without a single authentic document. Meanwhile, 300 million legal citizens must produce government papers to prove their right to go outside. That’s where we’re headed, and with remarkable speed.
The Fox News highlighted the examples of Michigan and Vermont, which have taken heavy-handed measures to combat the virus:
In Michigan, Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has ordered the few stores still open to fence off areas that offer furniture, paint or home improvement goods. Whitmer considers these “non-essential” items, so she’s prohibiting their sale. The governor of Vermont has issued similar orders for stores there. Other places will doubtless follow their lead. What’s the rationale for this? Wouldn’t closing off more sections of a store increase crowding in the areas that remain open?
Carlson has been a voice of reason throughout the Trump administration.
He understands the dangers of globalism and why it’s not in the best interests of Americans to embrace mass migration and so-called “free trade.”
At the same time, Americans shouldn’t have to give up their freedoms and livelihoods because of the political class’s errors — Such as opening up trade with China.
When it’s all said and done, Carlson will be remembered as one of the greatest voices for American nationalism in the 21st century


australiannationalreview--2020-04-16--Trump Administration Opposes Bill Gates’ Vaccine Tracking System on ‘Personal Liberty’ Grounds

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation bankrolled research by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that advocated essentially tattooing vaccine data “ directly into the skin ” of children .
“ Along with the vaccine , a child would be injected with a bit of dye that is invisible to the naked eye but easily seen with a special cell-phone filter , combined with an app that shines near-infrared light onto the skin .
The dye would be expected to last up to five years , according to tests on pig and rat skin and human skin in a dish , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrote about Gates ’ scheme .
Gates has been aggressively propagandizing on behalf of vaccines throughout the coronavirus pandemic .
He has made it clear that he wants countless shots administered to supposedly stop the spread of coronavirus .
“ Our foundation works a lot on diagnostics and vaccines , ” Gates said during a recent interview with CBS News .
He added that vaccine makers are the only entities “ that can really get things back on track where we ’ re not worried about large public gatherings.
” Gates said that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dialogue between our foundation experts and the government ” about how to get the world back to normal using his vaccines .
“ Which activities , like schools , have such benefit and can be done in a way that the risk of transmission is very low ?
And which activities , like mass gatherings , may be – in a certain sense – more optional ?
And so until you ’ re widely vaccinated , those may not come back at all , ” he said .
This all comes back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and its funding : depopulation .
“ Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines , health care , reproductive health services , we lower that [ the population ] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent , ” he said in a 2010 TED ( Technology , Entertainment , Design ) conference .
Gates could not have planned a crisis any better than the coronavirus panic to push his vaccination and depopulation agendas .

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation bankrolled research by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that advocated essentially tattooing vaccine data “directly into the skin” of children.
“Along with the vaccine, a child would be injected with a bit of dye that is invisible to the naked eye but easily seen with a special cell-phone filter, combined with an app that shines near-infrared light onto the skin. The dye would be expected to last up to five years, according to tests on pig and rat skin and human skin in a dish,” a Dec. 2019 Scientific American article wrote about Gates’ scheme.
Gates has been aggressively propagandizing on behalf of vaccines throughout the coronavirus pandemic. He has made it clear that he wants countless shots administered to supposedly stop the spread of coronavirus.
“Our foundation works a lot on diagnostics and vaccines,” Gates said during a recent interview with CBS News. He added that vaccine makers are the only entities “that can really get things back on track where we’re not worried about large public gatherings.”
Gates said that “there’s a lot of dialogue between our foundation experts and the government” about how to get the world back to normal using his vaccines.
“Which activities, like schools, have such benefit and can be done in a way that the risk of transmission is very low? And which activities, like mass gatherings, may be – in a certain sense – more optional? And so until you’re widely vaccinated, those may not come back at all,” he said.
This all comes back to Gates’ primary goal with his foundation and its funding: depopulation.
“Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that [the population] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent,” he said in a 2010 TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) conference.
Gates could not have planned a crisis any better than the coronavirus panic to push his vaccination and depopulation agendas.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-27--Parents of Saba Button who was victim of flu vaccine debacle receive payout from WA Government

THE parents of a WA girl who has been awarded millions in damages after a defective flu jab left her severely disabled say they it ’ s a “ massive relief ” the legal battle is over .
Mick and Kirsten Button ’ s daughter Saba was just 11 months old when she received the Fluvax shot in April 2010 .
The then toddler suffered a hypoxic brain injury , kidney , liver and bone marrow failure .
She can now no longer walk and talk and needs round-the-clock care .
Three days after Saba was admitted at Princess Margaret @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now banned for children under five .
Her parents launched legal action against the vaccine ’ s manufacturer CSL which then launched a cross-claim against the State of WA and the Minister for Health .
Today the Federal Court of Australia approved a settlement which had been reached between the parties .
While the details of the payout have been sealed , legal experts have previously said it could be more than $ 10 million .
Speaking at their Scarborough home today , the Buttons said they were pleased they could not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ move forward with Saba ’ s treatment .
“ I suppose today is a bittersweet feeling for us , ” Mr Button said .
“ It ’ s a relief to have the legal case behind us but we now have the ability to supply Saba with the care , therapy , the equipment , all the things she needs to give her the best quality of life we can .
“ She is an amazingly strong little girl who is inspiring us every day .
“ Again we would like to thank @ @ @ @ @ @ @ helped us through the last four years .
It ’ s been a long , tough road , so we certainly couldn ’ t have done this without them .
“ But this doesn ’ t just stop now .
Once all the cameras are gone we ’ re back to business and we have a lot do with Saba.
” The now five-year-old will need extensive therapy for the rest of her life .
Mrs Button said it was relief knowing they can now afford to give their daughter the best care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they were realistic about what it could achieve .
“ Saba can not be left alone , ” Mrs Button said .
“ By not having those other pressures on us makes it easier and having the funds there now to access and support that we need is amazing .
And not just once or twice a week , every day .
“ We are realistic as well with Saba that we are just looking for those one percenters , but they are huge for Saba if she achieves those things.
” In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fluvax was defective after testing conducted by the company prior to April 2010 identified fever as a serious side effect of the 2010 batch .
However the company denied liability then filed a cross-claim against the State of WA and the Health Minister .
In return the State of WA filed a defence to the cross claim denying any liability .
Settlement was reached between CSL , the State of WA and the family during recent mediation .
Today , Justice Michael Barker agreed to allow the settlement to proceed .
“ Her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” he said .
“ Her disabilities are profound and permanent .
She will require constant care for the remainder of her life.
” He also said he was pleased the parties reached the agreement saving the youngster and her parents the cost and stress of a lengthy trial .
Health Minister Kim Hames today issued a statement following the settlement saying he was please the matter was over and that he wished the Button family well .
After Saba was admitted to hospital in 2010 , it emerged there had been more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccination at PMH that flu season .
But this information wasn ’ t passed on to the general public until after Saba was in the intensive-care unit .
An independent inquiry found “ serious deficiency ’ ’ in reporting processes and slow responses by both state and federal authorities .
It also concluded the Department of Health ’ s Communicable Disease Control Directorate was “ informed of a significant rise in adverse reactions in early April 2010 , but did not take any further action while they gathered data ’ ’ .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Therapeutic Goods Administration released data revealing Fluvax was four times more likely to trigger side-effects in adults than two rival vaccines .

THE parents of a WA girl who has been awarded millions in damages after a defective flu jab left her severely disabled say they it’s a “massive relief” the legal battle is over.
Mick and Kirsten Button’s daughter Saba was just 11 months old when she received the Fluvax shot in April 2010.
The then toddler suffered a hypoxic brain injury, kidney, liver and bone marrow failure. She can now no longer walk and talk and needs round-the-clock care.
Three days after Saba was admitted at Princess Margaret Hospital, Fluvax was recalled. It is now banned for children under five.
Her parents launched legal action against the vaccine’s manufacturer CSL which then launched a cross-claim against the State of WA and the Minister for Health.
Today the Federal Court of Australia approved a settlement which had been reached between the parties. While the details of the payout have been sealed, legal experts have previously said it could be more than $10 million.
Speaking at their Scarborough home today, the Buttons said they were pleased they could not put the legal battle behind them and move forward with Saba’s treatment.
“I suppose today is a bittersweet feeling for us,” Mr Button said. “It’s a relief to have the legal case behind us but we now have the ability to supply Saba with the care, therapy, the equipment, all the things she needs to give her the best quality of life we can.
“She is an amazingly strong little girl who is inspiring us every day.
“Again we would like to thank all our family and friends who have helped us through the last four years. It’s been a long, tough road, so we certainly couldn’t have done this without them.
“But this doesn’t just stop now. Once all the cameras are gone we’re back to business and we have a lot do with Saba.”
The now five-year-old will need extensive therapy for the rest of her life.
Mrs Button said it was relief knowing they can now afford to give their daughter the best care possible.
But, she said, they were realistic about what it could achieve.
“Saba cannot be left alone,” Mrs Button said.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-28--‘You’re putting my child at risk’: Adam Bandt pleads with parents to vaccinate

Solar panels on roofs , compost bins in front yards : this tree-lined street is heartland for progressive Melbourne parents .
In these affluent inner-city enclaves – if the statistics are to be believed – parents are less likely to vaccinate their children .
Adam Bandt is not one of them .
Sitting on his front porch in Flemington with nine-month-old daughter Wren and wife Claudia Perkins , the Greens federal MP for Melbourne is furious with anti-vaxxers .
“ By not vaccinating your child you ’ re putting your child and my child at risk , ” he says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all share .
You wouldn ’ t dump your rubbish at a playground because you know it would affect the kids there.
” The measles outbreak that swept through Melbourne ’ s inner northern suburbs last month came to Bandt ’ s electorate doorstep , forcing him to pull his daughter out of swimming lessons for fear of infection .
Eighteen confirmed cases in nearby Brunswick and several more at Princes Hill Primary School , have led the couple , like many parents in or near the measles zone , to change their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be immunised against the disease until she turns one , they have stopped visiting friends in those areas and are nervous about group gatherings .
“ I didn ’ t think I ’ d have to be scared for her health living in the middle of Melbourne in a first-world country with a very good health system and some of the smartest medical scientists in the world , ” Bandt says .
“ I thought she ’ d be safe everywhere she went and to know now that there ’ s a preventable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s at risk of catching because of the decisions of other people is very scary.
” It is the first time Bandt has put his family in the spotlight .
Until now , the couple had fiercely guarded their daughter ’ s privacy , consciously separating her childhood from the cut-throat world of politics .
But now they want to turn their sense of helplessness into a call to arms .
Their appeal is particularly directed towards those parents who use their environmental ideals to inform the decision not to vaccinate .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a progressive thing to do .
You can live a natural life , use cloth nappies like we do , and minimise medical intervention in your kid ’ s upbringing but vaccination is the wrong place to draw the line , ” Bandt says .
Perkins is particularly concerned for her daughter ’ s health having watched her older brother suffer through a serious measles infection in his teens .
“ He was sick for weeks and he couldn ’ t get out of bed and had a huge fever and was just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think about how much littler Wren is and how much worse it could potentially be .
It ’ s really worrying , ” she says .
While Bandt has not met any constituents who do not vaccinate he is aware that after the Princes Hill outbreak it was revealed some parents who were new to Australia had not immunised their children due to a lack of understanding of the health system .
“ I suspect in Melbourne there may be a lot of unintentional non-vaccination .
So if there ’ s a silver-lining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people to just check and double check , especially if you ’ ve moved here recently .
“ Everyone should check whether they ’ re vaccinated and if they ’ re not , go out and do it .
We can ’ t allow this to spread .
Once we start having pockets of Melbourne where there ’ s outbreaks or less resistance it puts everyone at risk .
”

By Jill Stark
Solar panels on roofs, compost bins in front yards: this tree-lined street is heartland for progressive Melbourne parents.
In these affluent inner-city enclaves – if the statistics are to be believed – parents are less likely to vaccinate their children.
Adam Bandt is not one of them. Sitting on his front porch in Flemington with nine-month-old daughter Wren and wife Claudia Perkins, the Greens federal MP for Melbourne is furious with anti-vaxxers.
“By not vaccinating your child you’re putting your child and my child at risk,” he says. “The air is something we all share. You wouldn’t dump your rubbish at a playground because you know it would affect the kids there.”
The measles outbreak that swept through Melbourne’s inner northern suburbs last month came to Bandt’s electorate doorstep, forcing him to pull his daughter out of swimming lessons for fear of infection. Eighteen confirmed cases in nearby Brunswick and several more at Princes Hill Primary School, have led the couple, like many parents in or near the measles zone, to change their social routines. With Wren unable to be immunised against the disease until she turns one, they have stopped visiting friends in those areas and are nervous about group gatherings. “I didn’t think I’d have to be scared for her health living in the middle of Melbourne in a first-world country with a very good health system and some of the smartest medical scientists in the world,” Bandt says.
“I thought she’d be safe everywhere she went and to know now that there’s a preventable, potentially fatal disease that she’s at risk of catching because of the decisions of other people is very scary.”


australiannationalreview--2020-04-28--WHO, CDC & Gates Foundation Defunded Because of Vaccine Fraud

By U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Vaccine injury lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , Del Bigtree , producer of the suppressed vaccine documentary , ‘ VAXXED ’ and the Informed Consent Action Network ( ICAN ) are credited with this victory .
They demanded the relevant government documents proving that all federally approved vaccines had been tested for quality over the past 32 years — and there were NONE !
Zero , zilch , nada !
Here are the huge legal and practical implications in this victory for the American people : This means that the US Department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine makers have been deceiving the American people for over 30 years about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines .
This may ultimately mean that the continuing existence — at least in their current form — of five US “ healthcare ” agencies is now in doubt : the CDC , the FDA , the IOM , the NIH and the “ Health ” part of DHHS itself !
This may also threaten the existence of state medical boards and exclusive medical guilds like the AMA .
This means that vaccine makers have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical drug makers have been forced to do concerning biannual recertification for quality and effectiveness — meaning that their vaccines have never been tested for quality and have had no proven safety or effectiveness for over 30 years .
This case can now be legally cited by all parents fraudulently mandated by any government/ organizational regulation/ requirements that they must vaccinate their children for school or any other activity to stop the forced vaccination of their children .
This case can now be legally cited by all employees being mandated by their employers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their jobs .
This case can now be legally cited by all those who seek compensation for vaccine injury .
The future of allopathic medicine in its current form is now in doubt , and the global pharmaceutical cartel , since almost all of the drugs allopathic practitioners prescribe come from pharmaceutical corporations that have also committed vaccine fraud and injury .
( edited ) LIABILITY : All government officials who have passed laws legalizing vaccine fraud at the state , national , or international level , or otherwise aided and abetted this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine fraud , criminal malfeasance and in some cases , war crimes under the Nuremberg Code .
Source : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services .

By U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Vaccine injury lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Del Bigtree, producer of the suppressed vaccine documentary, ‘VAXXED’ and the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) are credited with this victory.
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/
They demanded the relevant government documents proving that all federally approved vaccines had been tested for quality over the past 32 years — and there were NONE! Zero, zilch, nada!
~ ~ ~
Here are the huge legal and practical implications in this victory for the American people:
This means that the US Department of Health and Human Services and all vaccine makers have been deceiving the American people for over 30 years about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines.
This may ultimately mean that the continuing existence — at least in their current form — of five US “healthcare” agencies is now in doubt: the CDC, the FDA, the IOM, the NIH and the “Health” part of DHHS itself!
This may also threaten the existence of state medical boards and exclusive medical guilds like the AMA.
This means that vaccine makers have been fraudulently exempt from what all other pharmaceutical drug makers have been forced to do concerning biannual recertification for quality and effectiveness — meaning that their vaccines have never been tested for quality and have had no proven safety or effectiveness for over 30 years.
This case can now be legally cited by all parents fraudulently mandated by any government/ organizational regulation/ requirements that they must vaccinate their children for school or any other activity to stop the forced vaccination of their children.
This case can now be legally cited by all employees being mandated by their employers to be vaccinated in order to retain their jobs.
This case can now be legally cited by all those who seek compensation for vaccine injury.
The future of allopathic medicine in its current form is now in doubt, and the global pharmaceutical cartel, since almost all of the drugs allopathic practitioners prescribe come from pharmaceutical corporations that have also committed vaccine fraud and injury. (edited)
LIABILITY: All government officials who have passed laws legalizing vaccine fraud at the state, national, or international level, or otherwise aided and abetted this vaccine fraud can now be charged with vaccine fraud, criminal malfeasance and in some cases, war crimes under the Nuremberg Code.
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Reporting: Bonnie Nirgude’ with Linda Forsythe


australiannationalreview--2020-04-28--Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination

Vaccines , for Bill Gates , are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses ( including Microsoft ’ s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise ) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy .
Gates ’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology .
Promising his share of $ 450 million of $ 1.2 billion to eradicate Polio , Gates took control of India ’ s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization ( NTAGI ) which mandated up to 50 doses ( Table 1 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to children before the age of five .
Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis ( NPAFP ) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017 .
In 2017 , the Indian government dialed back Gates ’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India .
NPAFP rates dropped precipitously .
In 2017 , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain .
The most frightening epidemics in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are all linked to vaccines .
In fact , by 2018 , 70 % of global polio cases were vaccine strain .
In 2014 , the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines , developed by Glaxo Smith Kline ( GSK ) and Merck , on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces .
Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects , including autoimmune and fertility disorders .
Seven died .
Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations : pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial , bullying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refusing medical care to the injured girls .
The case is now in the country ’ s Supreme Court .
In 2010 , the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK ’ s experimental malaria vaccine , killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis , seizure , and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,949 children .
During Gates ’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa , Gates ’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis .
Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.
” Nelson Mandela ’ s former Senior Economist , Professor Patrick Bond , describes Gates ’ philanthropic practices as “ ruthless and immoral.
” In 2010 , Gates committed $ 10 billion to the WHO saying , “ We must make this the decade of vaccines.
” A month later , Gates said in a Ted Talk that new vaccines “ could reduce population ” .
In 2014 , Kenya ’ s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine campaign .
Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested .
After denying the charges , WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade .
Similar accusations came from Tanzania , Nicaragua , Mexico , and the Philippines .
A 2017 study ( Morgenson et .
al .
2017 ) showed that WHO ’ s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents .
DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lethal vaccine which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually .
Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO ’ s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases : clean water , hygiene , nutrition , and economic development .
The Gates Foundation only spends about $ 650 million of its $ 5 billion dollar budget on these areas .
They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to control WHO , UNICEF , GAVI , and PATH , Gates funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines , and additionally is donating $ 50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a coronavirus vaccine .
In his recent media appearances , Gates appears confident that the Covid-19 crisis will now give him the opportunity to force his dictatorial vaccine programs on American children .
Note to readers : please click the share buttons above or below .
Forward this article to your email lists .
Crosspost on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ etc .

By Robert F. Kennedy Jr | Global Research
Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology.
Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate Polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.
The most frightening [polio] epidemics in Congo , Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines.
In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain.
In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
South African newspapers complained, ‘We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.’
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.
During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”
In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO saying, “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO has refused to recall the lethal vaccine which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.
[Global public health officials] say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.
Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. The Gates Foundation only spends about $650 million of its $5 billion dollar budget on these areas. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines, and additionally is donating $50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a coronavirus vaccine. In his recent media appearances, Gates appears confident that the Covid-19 crisis will now give him the opportunity to force his dictatorial vaccine programs on American children.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.