australiannationalreview--2020-07-03--Russia Developing Coronavirus Treatment That Disinfects the Body With UV Light From Inside

Russia Developing Coronavirus Treatment That Disinfects the Body With UV Light From Inside Scientists in Russia are developing a treatment for coronavirus that uses ultraviolet ( UV ) light to disinfect the body from the inside , Andrei Goverdovsky , from state nuclear agency Rosatom , has said .
In an interview with Country Rosatom , the agency ’ s newsletter , Goverdovsky said physicists at the Institute of Physics and Power Engineering ( IPPE ) are currently developing methods to combat viruses , including SARS-CoV-2 , which causes COVID-19 .
He said they have called the project “ luminous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one has managed to hold UV disinfection inside a person , ” he said .
“ We figured out how to do this .
We select molecules and gas components that when inhaled remain activated and emit ultraviolet light directly in the lungs .
We hope that in addition to coronavirus , our method [ can be used to ] treat tuberculosis , oncology and other diseases.
” Further details on how the technique works and what tests had been carried out as part of the project were not available .
The idea @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to treat coronavirus was highlighted by President Donald Trump during a press conference where he made a number of controversial remarks regarding possible COVID-19 therapies .
At the briefing , on April 23 , Trump asked if there was something that could be done to use disinfectant to kill the virus “ by injection.
” He also discussed the use of UV light , which in laboratory tests has been found to inactivate the virus .
“ I said supposing you brought the light inside the body , which you can do either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way , ” he said .
“ And I think you said you ’ re going to test that too .
So , we ’ ll see , but the whole concept of the light , the way it kills it in one minute—that ’ s pretty powerful.
” At the time , Trump ’ s comments on injecting disinfectants were widely condemned by scientists and health providers .
The idea of using UV light , however , is a concept currently being researched by scientists at Cedars-Sinai , Los Angeles , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ released after Trump ’ s comments by the nonprofit healthcare organization said the research is currently in the preclinical stages .
They hope to develop “ a technology that harnesses intermittent ultraviolet .
A light for treating viruses and bacteria.
” They said the treatment has not been tested on patients , but had signed a licensing agreement with Aytu BioScience in the hope it could be used to treat COVID-19 in the near future .
Mark Pimentel , who is leading the research at Cedars-Sinai , said the technology—dubbed Healight—administers UV light @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Our team has shown that administering a specific spectrum of UV-A light can eradicate viruses in infected human cells ( including coronavirus ) and bacteria in the area while preserving healthy cells , ” he said in a statement from Aytu BioScience .

Russia Developing Coronavirus Treatment That Disinfects the Body With UV Light From Inside
By HANNAH OSBORNE
Scientists in Russia are developing a treatment for coronavirus that uses ultraviolet (UV) light to disinfect the body from the inside, Andrei Goverdovsky, from state nuclear agency Rosatom, has said.
In an interview with Country Rosatom, the agency’s newsletter, Goverdovsky said physicists at the Institute of Physics and Power Engineering (IPPE) are currently developing methods to combat viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19. He said they have called the project “luminous gas.”
“So far, no one has managed to hold UV disinfection inside a person,” he said. “We figured out how to do this. We select molecules and gas components that when inhaled remain activated and emit ultraviolet light directly in the lungs. We hope that in addition to coronavirus, our method [can be used to] treat tuberculosis, oncology and other diseases.”
Further details on how the technique works and what tests had been carried out as part of the project were not available.
The idea of putting UV light inside the body to treat coronavirus was highlighted by President Donald Trump during a press conference where he made a number of controversial remarks regarding possible COVID-19 therapies. At the briefing, on April 23, Trump asked if there was something that could be done to use disinfectant to kill the virus “by injection.”
He also discussed the use of UV light, which in laboratory tests has been found to inactivate the virus. “I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way,” he said. “And I think you said you’re going to test that too. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute—that’s pretty powerful.”
At the time, Trump’s comments on injecting disinfectants were widely condemned by scientists and health providers. The idea of using UV light, however, is a concept currently being researched by scientists at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, and pharmaceutical company Aytu BioScience.
A statement released after Trump’s comments by the nonprofit healthcare organization said the research is currently in the preclinical stages. They hope to develop “a technology that harnesses intermittent ultraviolet. A light for treating viruses and bacteria.” They said the treatment has not been tested on patients, but had signed a licensing agreement with Aytu BioScience in the hope it could be used to treat COVID-19 in the near future.
Mark Pimentel, who is leading the research at Cedars-Sinai, said the technology—dubbed Healight—administers UV light using an endotracheal medical device. “Our team has shown that administering a specific spectrum of UV-A light can eradicate viruses in infected human cells (including coronavirus) and bacteria in the area while preserving healthy cells,” he said in a statement from Aytu BioScience.


australiannationalreview--2020-07-03--Joe Biden: I Will Force Americans to Wear Masks in Public

Joe Biden : I Will Force Americans to Wear Masks in Public Former Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he would compel Americans to wear masks in public if elected president .
In an interview with Pittsburgh CBS affiliate KDKA , Biden said that he would use federal power to “ mandate ” masks .
Q : I know you have been critical of the president ’ s handling of the pandemic in the past .
But let ’ s look ahead .
If you became president tomorrow , what would you do differently regarding the pandemic and getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden : I would go back to making sure that everybody had masks , that you had PPE [ personal protective equipment ] lined up , we ’ d have been making sure we stockpile all the things that we need that we don ’ t have now .
The one thing we do know , these masks make a gigantic difference .
I would insist that everybody out in public be wearing that mask .
Anyone to reopen — would have to make sure that they walked in their business that had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you use the federal leverage to mandate that , though ?
Biden : Yes , I would from an executive standpoint , yes , i would .
Q : So you would , in effect , mandate the wearing of masks .
Biden : I would do everything possible to make it required that people had to wear masks in public .
Biden fumbled with his mask throughout the interview , and has struggled with his own mask at previous events .
Biden went on to say that he would take off his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if he won the election .

Joe Biden: I Will Force Americans to Wear Masks in Public
By JOEL B. POLLAK
Former Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he would compel Americans to wear masks in public if elected president.
In an interview with Pittsburgh CBS affiliate KDKA, Biden said that he would use federal power to “mandate” masks.
Q: I know you have been critical of the president’s handling of the pandemic in the past. But let’s look ahead. If you became president tomorrow, what would you do differently regarding the pandemic and getting these surging cases now under control?
Biden: I would go back to making sure that everybody had masks, that you had PPE [personal protective equipment] lined up, we’d have been making sure we stockpile all the things that we need that we don’t have now. The one thing we do know, these masks make a gigantic difference. I would insist that everybody out in public be wearing that mask. Anyone to reopen — would have to make sure that they walked in their business that had masks.
Q: Couldn’t you use the federal leverage to mandate that, though?
Biden: Yes.
Q: Would you?
Biden: Yes, I would from an executive standpoint, yes, i would.
Q: So you would, in effect, mandate the wearing of masks.
Biden: I would do everything possible to make it required that people had to wear masks in public.
Biden fumbled with his mask throughout the interview, and has struggled with his own mask at previous events.
Biden went on to say that he would take off his mask when taking the oath of office if he won the election.


australiannationalreview--2020-07-03--BREAKING: BILL GATES NEGOTIATED $100 BILLION TRACK AND TRACE PROGRAM 6 MONTHS BEFORE PANDEMIC

Australian National Review ’ s community of readers and following is stronger than ever .
However , advertising revenues across @ @ @ @ @ especially without a paywall .
Will you help us remain a force for good and @ @ @ @ @ government and industry ?
At ANR , we are not affiliated with any big corporations @ @ @ @ @ government .
All we care about is unbiased and truthful reporting .
Also since Google @ @ @ @ @ other alternative news sites due to Google wanting only Fake News promoted by Mainstream Media @ @ @ @ @ truth .
We want to continue on our mission to enforce a free press , @ @ @ @ @ age where mainstream media and big corporations are going all out to suppress us .
@ @ @ @ @ donations we can ’ t fund ANR .
By supporting The Australian National Review with @ @ @ @ @ , you can help us ensure that everyone is informed of the truth and has @ @ @ @ @ years to come .

URGENT: JUST 7 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...


australiannationalreview--2020-07-03--‘Dishonest’: COVIDSafe app has not detected a case despite 6 million downloads

‘ Dishonest ’ : COVIDSafe app has not detected a case despite 6 million downloads The federal government ’ s COVIDSafe app has not identified any close contacts of a person infected with coronavirus who had not already been found through manual contact tracing , despite being downloaded by more than 6 million Australians in two months .
As the number of infections soars in Victoria , Centre Alliance senator Rex Patrick said the government was being dishonest about the effectiveness of the app , which Prime Minister Scott Morrison touted as “ sunscreen ” against major outbreaks and as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Patrick , who has an engineering background and was a project manager involved in rapid-prototyping and testing , said the government was refusing to concede the app “ wasn ’ t working properly , if at all ” .
“ I think the Prime Minister and the government were dishonest with the Australian public and I think that ’ s very sad , ” said the senator , a supporter of the app concept who himself was diagnosed with COVID-19 .
The $ 2 million app — downloaded more than 6.44 million times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic in Australia on April 26 — was built to help assist state and territory contact-tracing teams uncover close contacts of infected COVID-19 cases who may have been within 1.5 meters of them for more than 15 minutes in public places such as restaurants , cafés or shops .
But testing data provided to the Senate showed its effectiveness , particularly on Apple iPhones , remains an ongoing issue .
The testing data , released to the Senate ’ s select committee on COVID-19 , shows when an iPhone is locked there remain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ iPhone user .
Only 25 to 50 per cent of the time did it work on May 26 in locked iPhone-to-iPhone testing .
Issues were also prevalent on Android smartphones , with problems remaining on May 26 , especially when the app ’ s testers tried to get iPhones and Androids to share information .
At the app ’ s launch , Government Services Minister Stuart Robert said : “ To be effective , users should have the app running in the background when they are coming into contact with others .
Your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the app to work.
” Labor ’ s government services spokesman Bill Shorten accused the government of being “ secretive ” about the app ’ s dysfunction .
“ The current app is clearly not working well enough and the government is being secretive about how often it has actually made a difference , ” Mr Shorten said .
“ COVIDSafe has had major problems from the start like not working properly on iPhones … After millions of taxpayers ’ dollars have been spent , the app would want to start showing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be added to the pile of Stuart Robert ’ s disasters.
” Mr Robert rejected the criticisms , saying the app was working effectively .
“ The app was working at the time of launch – to say it wasn ’ t is incorrect , ” a spokesman for Mr Robert said .
“ The Australian community can have confidence it is working securely and effectively , despite the lack of community transmission of COVID-19.
” Mr Shorten said consideration should now be given to whether Australia should follow Britain ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure alert system , which most technology experts recommend as it is supported by both technology giants and was built with privacy in mind .
“ All options should be on the table for a functioning app , and we should certainly reflect on the UK moving to the Google and Apple framework , ” Mr Shorten said .
Britain delayed its tracing app this week and announced it planned a redesign of it using the Apple-Google model after it was found that it did not estimate distance well enough .
Mr Robert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Agency , the government department that helped build the app , and the federal Health Department were working with Apple and Google “ to understand and test ” the exposure notification framework since its release to see how it could be applied in Australia .
“ That testing is ongoing , ” The spokesman said .
On the app ’ s launch day , 6696 Australians had coronavirus .
Since then , a further 926 cases have been identified , many returned travellers .
Of the 926 , only 40 of those have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health officials to look at their close contact data .
Victoria had previously said it used the app to discover one contact who had not been identified by manual tracers .
However , it is understood that person was subsequently ruled not to be a “ close contact ” .
On Wednesday , Victoria ’ s Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton said his contact tracers had downloaded the app ’ s data 30 times but had not identified anyone who wasn ’ t already uncovered through the manual interview process .
“ There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the use of the app , ” Professor Sutton said .
Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt revealed on Thursday that NSW health officials had downloaded people ’ s contact data from the app 10 times .
But the NSW Health Department confirmed on Saturday no contacts or cases had been identified using the app .
“ As new cases in NSW have predominantly been in people in hotel quarantine recently , we have had limited opportunity to use the app during this time , ” NSW Health said .

‘Dishonest’: COVIDSafe app has not detected a case despite 6 million downloads
By Ben Grubb
The federal government’s COVIDSafe app has not identified any close contacts of a person infected with coronavirus who had not already been found through manual contact tracing, despite being downloaded by more than 6 million Australians in two months.
As the number of infections soars in Victoria, Centre Alliance senator Rex Patrick said the government was being dishonest about the effectiveness of the app, which Prime Minister Scott Morrison touted as “sunscreen” against major outbreaks and as the key to lifting restrictions.
Senator Patrick, who has an engineering background and was a project manager involved in rapid-prototyping and testing, said the government was refusing to concede the app “wasn’t working properly, if at all”.
“I think the Prime Minister and the government were dishonest with the Australian public and I think that’s very sad,” said the senator, a supporter of the app concept who himself was diagnosed with COVID-19.
The $2 million app — downloaded more than 6.44 million times and launched amid the height of the pandemic in Australia on April 26 — was built to help assist state and territory contact-tracing teams uncover close contacts of infected COVID-19 cases who may have been within 1.5 meters of them for more than 15 minutes in public places such as restaurants, cafés or shops.
But testing data provided to the Senate showed its effectiveness, particularly on Apple iPhones, remains an ongoing issue.
Senator Rex Patrick. CREDIT: ALEX ELLINGHAUSEN
The testing data, released to the Senate’s select committee on COVID-19, shows when an iPhone is locked there remain issues with the app detecting another nearby iPhone user. Only 25 to 50 per cent of the time did it work on May 26 in locked iPhone-to-iPhone testing.
At launch, it was worse, working only 25 per cent of the time or less for locked iPhone to locked iPhone. When it was running in the background, the app also didn’t work well.
Issues were also prevalent on Android smartphones, with problems remaining on May 26, especially when the app’s testers tried to get iPhones and Androids to share information.


australiannationalreview--2020-07-03--“No one has died from the coronavirus” says leading pathologist

“ No one has died from the coronavirus ” says leading pathologist Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov , President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent .
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization ( WHO ) a “ criminal medical organization ” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic .
Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association ( BPA ) president Dr. Alexov @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currently “ impossible ” to create a vaccine against the virus .
He also revealed that European pathologists haven ’ t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2 .
These stunning statements raise major questions , including about officials ’ and scientists ’ claims regarding the many vaccines they ’ re rushing into clinical trials around the world .
They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies ( which are beginning to be used to treat patients ) .
Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in many countries ( some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate ) .
And they ’ re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK , US , and Canada .
Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8 , 2020 , European Society of Pathology ( ESP ) webinar on COVID-19 .
The May @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov , chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens ’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health .
The video is on the BPA ’ s website , which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov ’ s main points .
We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English .
We then transcribed her translation .
The video is here and our English transcript is here .
Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found .
The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters .
These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology .
This is done via immunohistochemistry , which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them .
After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they ’ re specific for , the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re bound to – are located .
Therefore , in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus , pathologists can not verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body , or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else .
It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘ conspiracy theorist.
’ After all many people believe they ’ re everywhere these days , spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues .
In addition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings .
But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly .
Also , Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation .
He ’ s been a physician for 30 years .
He ’ s president of the BPA , a member of the ESP ’ s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there ’ s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying .
For example , the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there ’ s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19 ’ s lethality .
“ COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases , but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection , ” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April .
Adding in another interview : Also , one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalist , Amory Devereux , documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch ’ s postulates .
These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease .
We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19 .
Nor has the virus has been isolated , reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness .
In addition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two more journalists , Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter , added to the evidence that “ the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith , not fact.
” The pair also confirmed “ there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [ deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus ] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.
” Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that : Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sparked by the virus ( presenting as interstitial pneumonia ) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases .
Another revelation of his is that : As pointed to above , the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines , serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost .
In fact , there is no solid evidence the virus exists .
Dr. Alexov made still more important points .
For example , he noted that , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hasn ’ t been proven to kill youth : Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19 .
As a result , reported Dr. Alexov , by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria .
Also , the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19 .
“ That ’ s quite stressful for us , and for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protocols and procedures which we need to use , ” he told Dr. Katsarov .
“ …And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say , ‘ Hey , those pathologists didn ’ t know what they were doing [ when they said the cause of death was COVID-19 ] !
’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses , because they could be proven [ or disproven ] , and they could be checked again later.
” He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone : Drs .
Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns , combined with the emptying of hospitals ( ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients ) , halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments .
They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians .
We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions , including asking why he believes it ’ s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19 .
He didn ’ t answer the questions directly .
Dr. Alexov instead responded : We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov ’ s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov ’ s revelations .
We followed up by telephone with two of them .
None responded .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ his five colleagues answer our questions ?
We doubt it ’ s due to lack of English proficiency .
It ’ s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO ’ s directives and not speak out publicly .
( And , on top of that , pathology departments depend on governments for their funding . )
Nonetheless , pathologists like Drs .
Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection .
Perhaps that ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests , signs and symptoms .
And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly .

“No one has died from the coronavirus” says leading pathologist
Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov,
President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association
By Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett
A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.
Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.
He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.
These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.
They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).
Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).
And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.
Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.
The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.
We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.
Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.
The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.
Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.
It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.
In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.
But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.
Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.
On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.
For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.
“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:
In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”
Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.
These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.
In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”
The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”
Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:
the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”
He added that:
What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”
Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.
Another revelation of his is that:
“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”
As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.
Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:
[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”
(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)
Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:
the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”
Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.
Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.
“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”
He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:
I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”
(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)
Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.
They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.
We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”
In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.
Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”
We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.
He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:
We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.
Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?
We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.
It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)
Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.
Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.
Original source : https://www.globalresearch.ca/no-one-has-died-coronavirus


australiannationalreview--2020-07-03--Leaked ANTIFA’s plans show alleged Independence Day Massacre plans for July 4

The following alleged details have been discovered of domestic US Terrorist outfit ANTIFA which is funded by billionaire Hedge Fund operator George Soros with strong links to both Clinton ’ s and Bill Gates .
Soros has been found to use this strategy to overthrow democratically elected Presidents in foreign countries but now seems hell-bent on using his criminal strategy to overthrow President Trump .
Democrats already have been exposed pressuring Governors of US States to keep lockdowns in place to after the elections to defeat Trump Tuesday , June 23 , 2020 , 11:59 AM Subject : PLEASE be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ per state…many trained by radical Islam they plan on killing as many Trump supporters and whites as possible !
!
ANTIFA To Desecrate Gettysburg National Cemetery on July 4 – Then MURDER & BURN White Suburbs under cover of “ Fireworks ” ANTIFA is planning to desecrate the Gettysburg National Cemetery by burning flags there on July 4 ; just before they begin MURDERING White people and BURNING DOWN Suburbs the same day .
It will start at the desecration of Union Soldier graves at Gettysburg , Pa .
According to the Controlled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Law Enforcement Sensitive – For Official Use Only ” to Police and Fire Departments about ANTIFA already using fireworks to acclimate suburbia with sounds of explosions , so they can use those to cover for gunfire when they attack white , suburban , neighbourhoods the same day .
According to Controlled Unclassified Information ( CUI ) in a Bulletin issued to Police and Fire Departments , ANTIFA has been taking deliveries of very large shipments of professional-grade fireworks .
They have been sending teams out to various areas throughout America to detonate those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to achieve three ( 3 ) specific objectives : 1 ) The first objective is to test the response of local law enforcement .
If fireworks are going off around the clock and residents are filing complaints , will police respond ?
How long does it take them to respond ?
How many officers ?
Do they even respond at all ?
This data is being recorded by these groups and will prove to be very valuable intel for what is to come .
This is a very accurate barometer to test the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is to get local residents ( i.e : white people in nearby neighbourhoods ) acclimated to the frequent sounds of explosions that often sound like gunfire .
3 ) The final objective : Knowing response times and manpower of police , and having acclimated the local population into explosion sounds that mimic gunfire , to then committing arson attacks with professional fireworks to set so many fires , local Emergency Services are immediately overwhelmed , and enter houses to actually fire guns and kill as many as possible in white suburbs .
Unless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planet , you should be fully aware that America is currently under attack .
While mass-media has portrayed this situation as “ peaceful protests ” those engaged have been rioting , smashing private property and businesses , looting on a scale which is unparalleled , and beating , stabbing , shooting innocent people in the areas where these activities are taking place .
You have probably also read or overheard many reports of illegal fireworks and explosions that are currently taking place throughout many different US cities .
If you do a Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will find countless articles posted just in the last week or so .
Most of these news reports are local since local news is far more likely to have boots on the ground and residents reporting an accurate assessment as to what is actually going on .
However , national media outlets are largely attempting to paint this “ uptick ” in fireworks activity as a sign of people being overly “ celebratory ” in preparation for the 4th of July .
Here in Roanoke , I have been hearing fireworks ( ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ there was a lot !
!
At first , I thought of gunfire because of the way they went off .
Don ’ t know .
Here are the facts , so please pay close attention .
As a result of major 4th of July events being shut down and cancelled due to the Covid-19 pandemic , an overwhelming surplus of fireworks have flooded the market .
Several activist groups including ANTIFA , BLM and Weather-Underground are exploiting this surplus and are bulk purchasing from suppliers in extremely high volumes .
In many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ professional-grade fireworks .
The number of people in these groups must not be underestimated .
They operate like terrorists and use clandestine communication strategies .
There are many members of these in groups in most major cities and have been for several years .
Yes , these are essentially domestic terror cells , and as you ’ ve likely guessed , this is indeed the year in which they have been instructed to carry out their master ’ s dystopian agenda .
What they are doing is delivering fireworks in bulk , via @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have remembered the pallets of bricks that were being dropped off at various locations so Rioters could use those bricks to destroy property ?
This is a similar strategy .
Once these fireworks are delivered , they are then distributing them to any black people who wish to set them off for their own entertainment , previously under the guise of the non-existent “ Juneteenth ” holiday , and to make sure these fireworks were set off almost continually all day and night in various cities .
This may not be a shock @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that white , Marxist radicals are the ones who have been frequently arrested for burning buildings cars during these riots .
Again , these are activists/terrorists who have covertly infiltrated these predominantly black areas .
So , this answers the question of “ who ” is responsible for the huge number of fireworks complaints that have been circulating for a week or more .
You may remember a blip on Drudge and various other outlets not long ago about the riots reaching white neighbourhoods , and this is indeed the objective .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the process of being literally erased .
This should be clear by now .
There is much hatred out there and I expect it to raise its ugly head locally soon .
I sure hope I am wrong .
Pray for us and America .
We ’ re going 2 need it !
!
!
!
!
!
!

Leaked ANTIFA’s plans show alleged Independence Day Massacre plans for July 4
By Staff Reporter
The following alleged details have been discovered of domestic US Terrorist outfit ANTIFA which is funded by billionaire Hedge Fund operator George Soros with strong links to both Clinton’s and Bill Gates.
Soros has been found to use this strategy to overthrow democratically elected Presidents in foreign countries but now seems hell-bent on using his criminal strategy to overthrow President Trump.
Democrats already have been exposed pressuring Governors of US States to keep lockdowns in place to after the elections to defeat Trump
ANTIFA PLAN DEADLY PLAN
Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 11:59 AM Subject: PLEASE be aware this July 4……. 30,000 members per state…many trained by radical Islam they plan on killing as many Trump supporters and whites as possible!! ANTIFA To Desecrate Gettysburg National Cemetery on July 4 – Then MURDER & BURN White Suburbs under cover of “Fireworks” ANTIFA is planning to desecrate the Gettysburg National Cemetery by burning flags there on July 4; just before they begin MURDERING White people and BURNING DOWN Suburbs the same day. It will start at the desecration of Union Soldier graves at Gettysburg, Pa. According to the Controlled Unclassified Law Enforcement Bulletin issued as “Law Enforcement Sensitive – For Official Use Only” to Police and Fire Departments about ANTIFA already using fireworks to acclimate suburbia with sounds of explosions, so they can use those to cover for gunfire when they attack white, suburban, neighbourhoods the same day. According to Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in a Bulletin issued to Police and Fire Departments, ANTIFA has been taking deliveries of very large shipments of professional-grade fireworks. They have been sending teams out to various areas throughout America to detonate those fireworks for the past two weeks, to achieve three (3) specific objectives:
1) The first objective is to test the response of local law enforcement. If fireworks are going off around the clock and residents are filing complaints, will police respond? How long does it take them to respond? How many officers? Do they even respond at all? This data is being recorded by these groups and will prove to be very valuable intel for what is to come. This is a very accurate barometer to test the waters.
2) The second objective is to get local residents (i.e: white people in nearby neighbourhoods) acclimated to the frequent sounds of explosions that often sound like gunfire.
3) The final objective: Knowing response times and manpower of police, and having acclimated the local population into explosion sounds that mimic gunfire, to then committing arson attacks with professional fireworks to set so many fires, local Emergency Services are immediately overwhelmed, and enter houses to actually fire guns and kill as many as possible in white suburbs.
Unless you have been living on a different planet, you should be fully aware that America is currently under attack. While mass-media has portrayed this situation as “peaceful protests” those engaged have been rioting, smashing private property and businesses, looting on a scale which is unparalleled, and beating, stabbing, shooting innocent people in the areas where these activities are taking place. You have probably also read or overheard many reports of illegal fireworks and explosions that are currently taking place throughout many different US cities. If you do a Google search for “fireworks complaints” you will find countless articles posted just in the last week or so. Most of these news reports are local since local news is far more likely to have boots on the ground and residents reporting an accurate assessment as to what is actually going on. However, national media outlets are largely attempting to paint this “uptick” in fireworks activity as a sign of people being overly “celebratory” in preparation for the 4th of July. Here in Roanoke, I have been hearing fireworks(?) each PM.
The last PM there was a lot!! At first, I thought of gunfire because of the way they went off. Don’t know. Here are the facts, so please pay close attention. As a result of major 4th of July events being shut down and cancelled due to the Covid-19 pandemic, an overwhelming surplus of fireworks have flooded the market. Several activist groups including ANTIFA, BLM and Weather-Underground are exploiting this surplus and are bulk purchasing from suppliers in extremely high volumes. In many cases, these are highly dangerous, professional-grade fireworks. The number of people in these groups must not be underestimated. They operate like terrorists and use clandestine communication strategies. There are many members of these in groups in most major cities and have been for several years. Yes, these are essentially domestic terror cells, and as you’ve likely guessed, this is indeed the year in which they have been instructed to carry out their master’s dystopian agenda. What they are doing is delivering fireworks in bulk, via moving trucks and vans. You may have remembered the pallets of bricks that were being dropped off at various locations so Rioters could use those bricks to destroy property? This is a similar strategy. Once these fireworks are delivered, they are then distributing them to any black people who wish to set them off for their own entertainment, previously under the guise of the non-existent “Juneteenth” holiday, and to make sure these fireworks were set off almost continually all day and night in various cities. This may not be a shock, as you’re likely aware that white, Marxist radicals are the ones who have been frequently arrested for burning buildings cars during these riots. Again, these are activists/terrorists who have covertly infiltrated these predominantly black areas. So, this answers the question of “who” is responsible for the huge number of fireworks complaints that have been circulating for a week or more. You may remember a blip on Drudge and various other outlets not long ago about the riots reaching white neighbourhoods, and this is indeed the objective. The foundations of this great nation are in the process of being literally erased. This should be clear by now. There is much hatred out there and I expect it to raise its ugly head locally soon. I sure hope I am wrong. Pray for us and America. We’re going 2 need it!!!!!!!


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--ID2020 adviser quits over Microsoft’s influence and COVID-19 immunity passports

Harvard lawyer Elizabeth Renieris has resigned from the Technical Advisory Committee of the ID2020 ‘ digital identity ’ initiative .
Renieris , an advocate of the concept of ‘ self-sovereign identity ’ and a former Harvard classmate of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg , resigned due to ID2020 ’ s direction on digital immunity certificates and COVID-19 .
She also cited Microsoft ’ s influence on the project , while expressing concern over how corporations will influence the development of digital immunity certificates resulting in the erosion of civil liberties .
“ I can not be part of an organization overly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lip service to human rights , ” wrote Renieris in a resignation letter that she also sent to digital currency news site Coindesk .
Renieris also expressed doubts and uncertainty about ID2020 ’ s actual objectives , stating , “ At this stage , I can no longer even describe what ID2020 ’ s mission is with any confidence .
All I can perceive is a desire to promote decentralized identity solutions at all costs.
” ID2020 is a ‘ digital identity ’ project spearheaded by Bill Gates and Microsoft , and overseen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the UN ’ s Sustainable Development Goals Initiative , ID2020 ’ s purported goal is using digital identity as a solution to the problem of over 1 billion people who live without any officially recognized identity .
To achieve this ambitious goal , Microsoft has incorporated four other companies into ID2020 , forming the so called ‘ ID2020 Alliance ’ made up of Microsoft , Gavi Vaccine Alliance , Accenture , IDEO , and the Rockefeller Foundation .
Other companies like Mastercard recently joined the alliance as its profile continues to rise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the increasing likelihood of digital identity being used as a means to verify who has been vaccinated against COVID-19 .
Since its inception in 2016 , the ID2020 Alliance had mostly been under the radar and only recently came into the limelight when in March this year , Bill Gates inadvertently made it known that he intended to push for the use of digital certificates as way of verifying who has been vaccinated against the novel coronavirus .
Biohackinfo News was the first to report on this revelation by Gates .
In our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ projects which Gates has been funding over the years that could serve as one of several nodes of employing digital certificates .
As biohackers , we were excited about this development because human microchipping finally had an urgent , real world application outside the space of hobbyist cybernetics .
But based on the negative reaction the public had towards the idea of microchipping and the use of digital certificates as a way to return to normalcy during the pandemic , it looks like Bill Gates ’ Public Relations team decided that the negative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be mitigated , and damage control had to be at whatever the cost .
Ever since we published the article , we have had to fight off repeated cyber attacks originating from Microsoft ’ s offices , including the Redmond office in Seattle .
We have kept a log of these cyber attacks , and we are considering the appropriate course of legal action .
But more disturbing than Microsoft ’ s cyber attacks against us , is that for almost two months now , Bill Gates-funded “ fact checkers ” have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our article – by either misconstruing what the article actually says , or using complete disinformation .
ID2020 even had one Ben Parker , a known PR mouthpiece of the Gates Foundation , write a fluff piece about the organization .
In Parker ’ s propaganda article , ID2020 claims to have nothing to do with digital immunity certificates , and that it is solely working on providing digital identity to people without any legal identity .
The reasons for Renieris ’ resignation clearly prove otherwise , and ID2020 has clearly been lying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ especially since not too long ago , ID2020 ’ s executive director Dakota Gruener wrote an entire paper advocating for the use of digital immunity certificates during the ongoing pandemic .
A key component of the disinformation by the Bill Gates-funded “ fact checkers ” and now sadly the Nature scientific journal – which has accused us of starting a conspiracy theory against Bill Gates , is falsely claiming that we said Gates would use microchip implants to track people .
Anyone that has actually read our Bill Gates microchipping article in its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lie .
No currently available human-implantable microchip is capable of functioning as a tracker .
We as biohackers , know this and have been saying this to many people who think microchip implants can be used for tracking .
In said article , we clearly explain that microchip implants will serve the same purpose all current microchip implants mostly serve ; which is as identity tags .
Our Bill Gates microchipping article is clearly about the most feasible way of implementing digital certificates .
Microchip implants as identity tags are a good way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ records that would be contained in the digital certificates being promoted by Bill Gates .
So based on Gates ’ history of funding implantable technology like a birth control microchip implant and MIT ’ s quantum dot capsules , deducing that he could adopt microchip implants as digital certificates is NOT a conspiracy theory .
What ’ s funny is , despite Bill Gates openly funding microchipping projects and his Foundation ’ s website listing some of these projects , he recently told the media that he knows nothing about microchip implants !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in any sort of microchip type thing !
” said Gates in a call with Business Insider , acting oblivious .
This is pathological lying is very strange and should because for concern .
Gates is blatantly lying about never having any involvement with something he openly funds .
The fact that the COVID-19 Pandemic has resulted in Gates being positioned by politicians and mainstream media as some sort of messiah figure – while being handed total monopoly over global health , even though he has no medical qualifications , should raise more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Why are American politicians like Republican Senator Lindsey Graham not only defending Gates in this blatant lie , but also demanding that Gates be made the head of the World Health Organization ?
Why is Bill Gates lying ?
What is Bill Gates , a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein , hiding ?
The resignation of Elizabeth Reineris and her uncertainty about what the real mission of ID2020 is , reflects our current predicament .
We initially thought the purpose of ID2020 and digital immunity certificates – whether deployed through microchip implants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But given all the gaslighting , the lack of transparency by ID2020 , the attacks against us by Microsoft and the disinformation originating from Bill Gates himself , one wonders , what is really going on with ID2020 ?
What is Bill Gates up to ?

ID2020 adviser quits over Microsoft’s influence and COVID-19 immunity passports
By Biohackinfo News
Harvard lawyer Elizabeth Renieris has resigned from the Technical Advisory Committee of the ID2020 ‘digital identity’ initiative.
Renieris, an advocate of the concept of ‘self-sovereign identity’ and a former Harvard classmate of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, resigned due to ID2020’s direction on digital immunity certificates and COVID-19. She also cited Microsoft’s influence on the project, while expressing concern over how corporations will influence the development of digital immunity certificates resulting in the erosion of civil liberties.
“I cannot be part of an organization overly influenced by commercial interests that only pays lip service to human rights,” wrote Renieris in a resignation letter that she also sent to digital currency news site Coindesk.
Renieris also expressed doubts and uncertainty about ID2020’s actual objectives, stating, “At this stage, I can no longer even describe what ID2020’s mission is with any confidence. All I can perceive is a desire to promote decentralized identity solutions at all costs.”
ID2020 is a ‘digital identity’ project spearheaded by Bill Gates and Microsoft, and overseen by the United Nations. As part of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals Initiative, ID2020’s purported goal is using digital identity as a solution to the problem of over 1 billion people who live without any officially recognized identity.
To achieve this ambitious goal, Microsoft has incorporated four other companies into ID2020, forming the so called ‘ID2020 Alliance’ made up of Microsoft, Gavi Vaccine Alliance, Accenture, IDEO, and the Rockefeller Foundation. Other companies like Mastercard recently joined the alliance as its profile continues to rise in light of the Coronavirus Pandemic and the increasing likelihood of digital identity being used as a means to verify who has been vaccinated against COVID-19.
Since its inception in 2016, the ID2020 Alliance had mostly been under the radar and only recently came into the limelight when in March this year, Bill Gates inadvertently made it known that he intended to push for the use of digital certificates as way of verifying who has been vaccinated against the novel coronavirus.
Biohackinfo News was the first to report on this revelation by Gates. In our article, we mentioned several human microchipping projects which Gates has been funding over the years that could serve as one of several nodes of employing digital certificates. As biohackers, we were excited about this development because human microchipping finally had an urgent, real world application outside the space of hobbyist cybernetics.
But based on the negative reaction the public had towards the idea of microchipping and the use of digital certificates as a way to return to normalcy during the pandemic, it looks like Bill Gates’ Public Relations team decided that the negative PR from his own bean-spilling had to be mitigated, and damage control had to be at whatever the cost.
Ever since we published the article, we have had to fight off repeated cyber attacks originating from Microsoft’s offices, including the Redmond office in Seattle. We have kept a log of these cyber attacks, and we are considering the appropriate course of legal action.
But more disturbing than Microsoft’s cyber attacks against us, is that for almost two months now, Bill Gates-funded “fact checkers” have been posting articles and dissertations “debunking” our article – by either misconstruing what the article actually says, or using complete disinformation.
ID2020 even had one Ben Parker, a known PR mouthpiece of the Gates Foundation, write a fluff piece about the organization. In Parker’s propaganda article, ID2020 claims to have nothing to do with digital immunity certificates, and that it is solely working on providing digital identity to people without any legal identity. The reasons for Renieris’ resignation clearly prove otherwise, and ID2020 has clearly been lying about its involvement in immunity passports, especially since not too long ago, ID2020’s executive director Dakota Gruener wrote an entire paper advocating for the use of digital immunity certificates during the ongoing pandemic.
A key component of the disinformation by the Bill Gates-funded “fact checkers” and now sadly the Nature scientific journal – which has accused us of starting a conspiracy theory against Bill Gates, is falsely claiming that we said Gates would use microchip implants to track people. Anyone that has actually read our Bill Gates microchipping article in its entirety can tell you this is a lie. No currently available human-implantable microchip is capable of functioning as a tracker. We as biohackers, know this and have been saying this to many people who think microchip implants can be used for tracking.
In said article, we clearly explain that microchip implants will serve the same purpose all current microchip implants mostly serve; which is as identity tags.
Our Bill Gates microchipping article is clearly about the most feasible way of implementing digital certificates. Microchip implants as identity tags are a good way of holding digital records, including immunization records that would be contained in the digital certificates being promoted by Bill Gates. So based on Gates’ history of funding implantable technology like a birth control microchip implant and MIT’s quantum dot capsules, deducing that he could adopt microchip implants as digital certificates is NOT a conspiracy theory.
What’s funny is, despite Bill Gates openly funding microchipping projects and his Foundation’s website listing some of these projects, he recently told the media that he knows nothing about microchip implants!
“I’ve never been involved in any sort of microchip type thing!” said Gates in a call with Business Insider, acting oblivious.
This is pathological lying is very strange and should because for concern. Gates is blatantly lying about never having any involvement with something he openly funds. The fact that the COVID-19 Pandemic has resulted in Gates being positioned by politicians and mainstream media as some sort of messiah figure – while being handed total monopoly over global health, even though he has no medical qualifications, should raise more alarm in light of this blatant lie.
Why are American politicians like Republican Senator Lindsey Graham not only defending Gates in this blatant lie, but also demanding that Gates be made the head of the World Health Organization? Why is Bill Gates lying? What is Bill Gates, a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein, hiding?
The resignation of Elizabeth Reineris and her uncertainty about what the real mission of ID2020 is, reflects our current predicament. We initially thought the purpose of ID2020 and digital immunity certificates – whether deployed through microchip implants or not, was straightforward and well-intentioned. But given all the gaslighting, the lack of transparency by ID2020, the attacks against us by Microsoft and the disinformation originating from Bill Gates himself, one wonders, what is really going on with ID2020? What is Bill Gates up to?
Original source : https://biohackinfo.com/news-elizabeth-renieris-id2020-coronavirus-bill-gates-digital-certificate


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--FAUCI MISLEADS PUBLIC; COMPLAINS ABOUT DISTRUST

FAUCI MISLEADS PUBLIC ; COMPLAINS ABOUT DISTRUSTIn March , Dr. Tony Fauci told Americans that masks won ’ t stop @ @ @ @ @ Recently he admitted that public health officials were misleading on purpose , to stop the @ @ @ @ @ of the masks .
In the same breath he complains a large portion of the @ @ @ @ @ and they ‘ don ’ t believe authority.
’ Posted by The HighWire with Del @ @ @ @ @ 30 , 2020


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--Hong Kong loses independence as China takes hold of national security

While you slept last night , Hong Kong lost its independence to China .
Chinese President Xi Jinping ’ s new national security laws came into effect at 1am Sydney time , an hour before the 23rd anniversary of the handover of Hong Kong to Chinese rule .
The legislation was not made public before the bill was signed by Mr Xi in Beijing .
Now the worst fears of critics have been realised .
Mr Xi now has the power to impose life sentences for crimes of “ collusion with a foreign power ” on any citizen or resident @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be jailed for life .
He now has the power to order the surveillance and the wiretapping of anyone suspected of being linked to these crimes .
Anyone convicted in Mr Xi ’ s courts on these charges will be banned from standing in Hong Kong elections .
And Mr Xi now has legal authority to establish a national security agency in the heart of Hong Kong to monitor what its people say on social media , in public and in their homes .
The days of one country , two systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strikes ” , as the Global Times describes them , have “ nothing to do with freedom of speech , assembly and association ” .
“ Claims that the law was enacted to strengthen control on Hong Kong society are either prejudiced interpretations or ill-intentioned propaganda , ” it wrote after details of the laws were revealed .
“ But there had been a vacuum in relevant legislation due to opposition forces ’ obstruction .
“ The city ’ s unrest is directly related to the absence of the national security law .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ central government to take action and for the Standing Committee of the NPC to legislate it.
” The Global Times denies this means the death of the one country , two systems and alleges “ extreme forces in Hong Kong ” have unfairly used the independent system to “ collude with the US and other external forces to mess up the city ” .
This is the reason for violent protests , it argues .
The newspaper ’ s words give insight into the motivations of Mr Xi and why he acted so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ There is a malicious scheme to pull Hong Kong from China into the US ’ power circle and turn the city into a fulcrum for the US to contain China , ” the Global Times wrote .
“ Some forces in Hong Kong have been actively coordinating with such a scheme .
“ These forces have dragged Hong Kong off the right track of development .
Over the past few years , the city has suddenly become highly politicized and violent , caring not about its precious status as an international financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the US and lost its way.
” China has become increasingly more hostile to the West since the coronavirus outbreak .
The world is owed an explanation as to how it convinced the World Health Organisation to cover up evidence of the outbreak in the early days .
But there are also more immediate security concerns that deserve a watchful eye .
While China took hold of Hong Kong , one of its foremost technology giants , Huawei , was making a play to be involved in the development of Australian cybersecurity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Coalition ’ s 2020 Cyber Security Strategy was drafted with Chinese cybersecurity attacks in mind .
Still , most recently Huawei is pushing Prime Minister Scott Morrison to consider funding “ new applications and business models for 5G ” and allow it greater access to tertiary education facilities .
A terrifying notion considering the Chinese Government has the ability to order surveillance on any Huawei employee living on the mainland .
It is also logical to assume data at the centre of any agreement would be compromised .
Australian Universities rely so heavily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ empty coffers that their opinions on the matter should thoroughly be ignored .
We must keep Australian critical infrastructure and education facilities free of all compromise .
The Chinese Government has no interest in civility or compromise .
It only wants dominance and subservience .
Don ’ t believe me ?
Ask those living in Hong Kong who have just lost their right to freedom .

Hong Kong loses independence as China takes hold of national security
By Digital Editor Jack Houghton | Sky News
Hong Kong loses independence as China takes hold of national security
While you slept last night, Hong Kong lost its independence to China.
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s new national security laws came into effect at 1am Sydney time, an hour before the 23rd anniversary of the handover of Hong Kong to Chinese rule.
The legislation was not made public before the bill was signed by Mr Xi in Beijing.
Now the worst fears of critics have been realised.
Mr Xi now has the power to impose life sentences for crimes of “collusion with a foreign power” on any citizen or resident of Hong Kong.
Even non-permanent residents can be jailed for life.
He now has the power to order the surveillance and the wiretapping of anyone suspected of being linked to these crimes.
Anyone convicted in Mr Xi’s courts on these charges will be banned from standing in Hong Kong elections.
And Mr Xi now has legal authority to establish a national security agency in the heart of Hong Kong to monitor what its people say on social media, in public and in their homes.
The days of one country, two systems are officially over.
China’s state-owned media has applauded the developments.
The “law strikes”, as the Global Times describes them, have “nothing to do with freedom of speech, assembly and association”.
“Claims that the law was enacted to strengthen control on Hong Kong society are either prejudiced interpretations or ill-intentioned propaganda,” it wrote after details of the laws were revealed.
“Hong Kong needs a law to safeguard national security.
“But there had been a vacuum in relevant legislation due to opposition forces’ obstruction.
“The city’s unrest is directly related to the absence of the national security law. Eventually, it is logical for the central government to take action and for the Standing Committee of the NPC to legislate it.”
The Global Times denies this means the death of the one country, two systems and alleges “extreme forces in Hong Kong” have unfairly used the independent system to “collude with the US and other external forces to mess up the city”.
This is the reason for violent protests, it argues.
The newspaper’s words give insight into the motivations of Mr Xi and why he acted so swiftly to impose such radical changes.
“There is a malicious scheme to pull Hong Kong from China into the US’ power circle and turn the city into a fulcrum for the US to contain China,” the Global Times wrote.
“Some forces in Hong Kong have been actively coordinating with such a scheme.
“These forces have dragged Hong Kong off the right track of development. Over the past few years, the city has suddenly become highly politicized and violent, caring not about its precious status as an international financial hub. It turned into a puppet of the US and lost its way.”
China has become increasingly more hostile to the West since the coronavirus outbreak.
The world is owed an explanation as to how it convinced the World Health Organisation to cover up evidence of the outbreak in the early days.
But there are also more immediate security concerns that deserve a watchful eye.
While China took hold of Hong Kong, one of its foremost technology giants, Huawei, was making a play to be involved in the development of Australian cybersecurity infrastructure.
Ironically, much of the Coalition’s 2020 Cyber Security Strategy was drafted with Chinese cybersecurity attacks in mind.
Still, most recently Huawei is pushing Prime Minister Scott Morrison to consider funding “new applications and business models for 5G” and allow it greater access to tertiary education facilities.
A terrifying notion considering the Chinese Government has the ability to order surveillance on any Huawei employee living on the mainland.
It is also logical to assume data at the centre of any agreement would be compromised.
Australian Universities rely so heavily on Chinese students to fill their now empty coffers that their opinions on the matter should thoroughly be ignored.
We must keep Australian critical infrastructure and education facilities free of all compromise.
The Chinese Government has no interest in civility or compromise. It only wants dominance and subservience.
Don’t believe me? Ask those living in Hong Kong who have just lost their right to freedom.
Original source : https://www.skynews.com.au/details/5efbebd1a0e8450018f923b9


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--COVID TEST DOESN’T TEST FOR COVID

COVID TEST DOESN’T TEST FOR COVID

10 Things You Should Know About COVID Testing 1 .
The process used for COVID testing has always been deemed “ an invention ” , as it was never qualified as a test .
This invention is called PCR , standing for polymerase chain reaction .
2 .
The inventor of PCR , Kary B. Mullis , said “ these PCR tests can not detect infectious free viruses at all.
” That ’ s direct from the inventor of PCR .
3 .
The PCR was invented to merely have bits of genetic material in a sample multiply until those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see under a microscope .
PCR just helps scientists observe small things in greater quantity .
Where those bits of genetic material came from , what they do , do they make people sick etc……the PCR process is not involved in that determination what so ever .
4 .
In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone ’ s illness , the entire virus ( the complete genetic sequence ) must be isolated in its entirety .
This has not yet been done with COVID 19 .
This is correct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be isolated and that ’ s supposed to be the first step before any other steps are taken in such a process that ends with a viral declaration…let alone a pandemic declaration .
5 .
In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone ’ s illness , the entire virus ( which has never been isolated for COVID ) must be transferred over to another animal or human host…..and that virus MUST cause the exact same illness in the host .
This has not yet been done with COVID-19 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ proven to cause disease , person to person .
Why are these steps being bypassed ?
6 .
In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone ’ s illness , the entire virus ( which has never been isolated for COVID-19 ) must not only infect the host with the exact same disease , you must also find the complete genetic viral sequence in the infected tissue of the host and then re-isolate the entire genetic sequence from infected tissues of the host .
This has not yet been done @ @ @ @ @ @ @ person , has not been proven for COVID-19 .
This is the easiest criteria to organize yet it remains undone .
7 .
In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone ’ s illness , you must also have a control group , so you can make sure that what you call a virus isn ’ t just regular human genetic material , shared by all humans .
If you find the exact same 80 % genetic material strand in the samples of HEALTHY CONTROLS , what you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cause of the disease because it ’ s just regular genetic material found in all humans…both sick and healthy .
In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone ’ s illness , you need to find that particular complete viral sequence IN THE SICK ONLY and not in the healthy .
This has not yet been done for COVID-19 .
Why is the gold standard of testing ( having a control group ) being bypassed ?
8 .
In the case of COVID-19 , scientists have indeed found a string @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sequence ) that shares 80 % similarities with SARS-COVID ( a sequence said to cause SARS ) and therefore the original Chinese scientists have declared that this string of material reflects a COVID infection .
( but also did that without testing any healthy people , to see if healthy people also have the same genetic material ) Humans share 97 % genetic material with chimpanzees , 80 % genetic material with cats and 50 % genetic material with a banana and that ’ s why shared genetic material IS NEVER the standard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is why the Tanzanian President recently found positive PCR results when he secretly tested a goat , fruit and motor oil….because most things on earth share similar genetic sequences .
http : //tiny.cc/1vryoz We share 61 % genetic material with fruit flies and 85 % genetic material with mice .
Shared material is never good enough to declare anything as concrete in real science .
To declare viral disease you always need a full 100 % viral genetic match to a past 100 % viral genetic sequence in the past .
This so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Why 9 .
The PCR INVENTION shouldn ’ t be used as a way to diagnose any disease because it ’ s simply designed to make small bits of genetic material more visible under a microscope .
Those small bits were always designed to be studied , not to conclude disease or no disease , winners or losers , black or white , go home or go to “ a camp ” etc .
Where that genetic material comes from ( from you or from a large number of friendly organisms that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reflects if that genetic material is making you sick .
This is why the PCR process has already been shown ( in its current misused way ) to declare 8 out of 10 people positive with COVID , when they ’ re perfectly healthy .
Out of 10 people in a COVID testing area , 8 will be told they have COVID , 2 will not…..and there ’ s absolutely no basis to any of those declarations what so ever .
The PCR can ’ t test for COVID , it never could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why are we using it ?
10 .
This is the testing process being used to remove children from their parents , remove adults from their homes , destroy the economy , shut down the food supply , enforce martial law , destroy civil liberties , criminalize normal human activity and force an untested vaccine onto the public , while government officials have inserted into mandates ( which are not laws ) that both government officials and vaccine companies are not legally responsible for any “ failures ” in this system where citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while knowing that the COVID death and infection figures ( and the testing ) are already proven fraudulent .
https : //bit.ly/2ztPLj4 Are you ready to go bankrupt based on COVID death numbers proven to be fabricated by government and media ?
Are you ready to have a child removed from your care based on a test that ’ s proven completely fraudulent ?
Are you willing to take an untested vaccine , while giving full legal immunity for death and permanent injury ( and future cancers/auto immunity diseases etc ) to government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fabricated death and infection numbers plus a fraudulent testing process ?
Two videos here from a medical doctor , which explains all these points , in much finer detail .
This video below is also highly interesting…..

COVID TEST DOESN’T TEST FOR COVID
By Jason Christoff
10 Things You Should Know About COVID Testing
1. The process used for COVID testing has always been deemed “an invention”, as it was never qualified as a test. This invention is called PCR, standing for polymerase chain reaction.
2. The inventor of PCR, Kary B. Mullis, said “these PCR tests cannot detect infectious free viruses at all.” That’s direct from the inventor of PCR.
3. The PCR was invented to merely have bits of genetic material in a sample multiply until those small broken pieces were numerous enough to see under a microscope. PCR just helps scientists observe small things in greater quantity. Where those bits of genetic material came from, what they do, do they make people sick etc……the PCR process is not involved in that determination what so ever.
4. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (the complete genetic sequence) must be isolated in its entirety. This has not yet been done with COVID 19. This is correct. No complete virus has yet to be isolated and that’s supposed to be the first step before any other steps are taken in such a process that ends with a viral declaration…let alone a pandemic declaration.
5. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for COVID) must be transferred over to another animal or human host…..and that virus MUST cause the exact same illness in the host. This has not yet been done with COVID-19. The COVID19 virus has not yet been proven to cause disease, person to person. Why are these steps being bypassed?
6. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for COVID-19) must not only infect the host with the exact same disease, you must also find the complete genetic viral sequence in the infected tissue of the host and then re-isolate the entire genetic sequence from infected tissues of the host. This has not yet been done with COVID-19. Disease transmission person to person, has not been proven for COVID-19. This is the easiest criteria to organize yet it remains undone.
7. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you must also have a control group, so you can make sure that what you call a virus isn’t just regular human genetic material, shared by all humans. If you find the exact same 80% genetic material strand in the samples of HEALTHY CONTROLS, what you’re looking at CAN’T be the cause of the disease because it’s just regular genetic material found in all humans…both sick and healthy. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you need to find that particular complete viral sequence IN THE SICK ONLY and not in the healthy. This has not yet been done for COVID-19. Why is the gold standard of testing (having a control group) being bypassed?
8. In the case of COVID-19, scientists have indeed found a string of genetic material (not a complete sequence) that shares 80% similarities with SARS-COVID (a sequence said to cause SARS) and therefore the original Chinese scientists have declared that this string of material reflects a COVID infection. (but also did that without testing any healthy people, to see if healthy people also have the same genetic material) Humans share 97% genetic material with chimpanzees, 80% genetic material with cats and 50% genetic material with a banana and that’s why shared genetic material IS NEVER the standard used to diagnose any disease. This is why the Tanzanian President recently found positive PCR results when he secretly tested a goat, fruit and motor oil….because most things on earth share similar genetic sequences. https://tiny.cc/1vryoz We share 61% genetic material with fruit flies and 85% genetic material with mice. Shared material is never good enough to declare anything as concrete in real science. To declare viral disease you always need a full 100% viral genetic match to a past 100% viral genetic sequence in the past. This so far has not been done for COVID19. Why
9. The PCR INVENTION shouldn’t be used as a way to diagnose any disease because it’s simply designed to make small bits of genetic material more visible under a microscope. Those small bits were always designed to be studied, not to conclude disease or no disease, winners or losers, black or white, go home or go to “a camp” etc. Where that genetic material comes from (from you or from a large number of friendly organisms that live inside you) in no way reflects if that genetic material is making you sick. This is why the PCR process has already been shown (in its current misused way) to declare 8 out of 10 people positive with COVID, when they’re perfectly healthy. Out of 10 people in a COVID testing area, 8 will be told they have COVID, 2 will not…..and there’s absolutely no basis to any of those declarations what so ever. The PCR can’t test for COVID, it never could and the inventor said so. So why are we using it?
10. This is the testing process being used to remove children from their parents, remove adults from their homes, destroy the economy, shut down the food supply, enforce martial law, destroy civil liberties, criminalize normal human activity and force an untested vaccine onto the public, while government officials have inserted into mandates (which are not laws) that both government officials and vaccine companies are not legally responsible for any “failures” in this system where citizens are killed or injured,…..all the while knowing that the COVID death and infection figures (and the testing) are already proven fraudulent. https://bit.ly/2ztPLj4 Are you ready to go bankrupt based on COVID death numbers proven to be fabricated by government and media? Are you ready to have a child removed from your care based on a test that’s proven completely fraudulent? Are you willing to take an untested vaccine, while giving full legal immunity for death and permanent injury (and future cancers/auto immunity diseases etc) to government officials and vaccine makers, based on fabricated death and infection numbers plus a fraudulent testing process?
Two videos here from a medical doctor, which explains all these points, in much finer detail.

This video below is also highly interesting…..

Original source : https://jchristoff.com/covid-test-doesnt-test-for-covid/


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--BREAKING: The World Health Organization made a complete U turn and said that coronavirus patients do

BREAKING: The World Health Organization made a complete U turn and said that coronavirus patients doesn’t need to be isolated or quarantined.

BREAKING : The World Health Organization made a complete U turn and said that coronavirus patients doesn ’ t need @ @ @ @ @ .
The # WorldHealthOrganization made a complete U turn and said that # coronavirus patients @ @ @ @ @ isolated or quarantined .
No # SocialDistancing and it can not even transmit from one @ @ @ @ @ the video .
* # coronascam pic.twitter.com/l2qiTw4Lco


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--Doctor questions is this a “pandemic or plandemic?

Doctor questions is this a “ pandemic or plandemic ?
Prime Minister Scott Morrison declared a ‘ Global Pandemic ’ on January 21 , 2020 , months before the WHO ( March 11 , 2020 ) , despite having NO cases of Coronavirus in Australia and despite the fact that we have never had a global pandemic using the traditional practices for controlling infectious diseases .
On this day , only 41 cases of the COVID-19 disease were recorded in Wuhan , China ; seven of which were described as seriously ill. A global pandemic in 2020 is a highly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infectious diseases were controlled by public health infrastructure , nutrition and good quality healthcare systems in many countries .
So why would Mr. Morrison believe this virus would become a pandemic in all countries , and claim so on January 21 , 2020 ?
Why would he think that this new coronavirus would become a global pandemic when coronaviruses make up 7-15 % of all the common respiratory viruses that cause the common cold AND they mutate every year ?
I ’ ll tell you why .
Like other Prime Ministers including Boris @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates to discuss the development of a vaccine — the ‘ end solution ’ — for the COVID-19 crisis .
Bill Gates is one of the biggest voluntary donors of the WHO , donating over $ 836 million over the past two years .
Additionally , recently , our Prime Minister met with Mr. Gates who donated $ 10 million to Australia ’ s Murdoch Children ’ s Research Institute ( MCRI ) to develop a COVID-19 vaccine .
This explains the fear mongering in mainstream media and the ongoing push to promote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ .
We , as the public , are being forced to make medical decisions based on misinformation spread by those with a vested interest in vaccines .
We need to spread actual facts and continue protecting our fundamental human right to bodily autonomy .
Evidence points towards this being a PLandemic , not a Pandemic .
Thank you , Judy Wilyman ?
?

Doctor questions is this a “pandemic or plandemic?
By Judy Wilyman
Prime Minister Scott Morrison declared a ‘Global Pandemic’ on January 21, 2020, months before the WHO (March 11, 2020), despite having NO cases of Coronavirus in Australia and despite the fact that we have never had a global pandemic using the traditional practices for controlling infectious diseases. On this day, only 41 cases of the COVID-19 disease were recorded in Wuhan, China; seven of which were described as seriously ill.
A global pandemic in 2020 is a highly unlikely occurrence since the 1950s/60s, when infectious diseases were controlled by public health infrastructure, nutrition and good quality healthcare systems in many countries.
So why would Mr. Morrison believe this virus would become a pandemic in all countries, and claim so on January 21, 2020? Why would he think that this new coronavirus would become a global pandemic when coronaviruses make up 7-15% of all the common respiratory viruses that cause the common cold AND they mutate every year?
I’ll tell you why. Like other Prime Ministers including Boris Johnson, Mr. Morrison met with Bill Gates to discuss the development of a vaccine — the ‘end solution’ — for the COVID-19 crisis.
Bill Gates is one of the biggest voluntary donors of the WHO, donating over $836 million over the past two years. Additionally, recently, our Prime Minister met with Mr. Gates who donated $10 million to Australia’s Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (MCRI) to develop a COVID-19 vaccine. This explains the fear mongering in mainstream media and the ongoing push to promote the idea of a ‘global pandemic’.
We, as the public, are being forced to make medical decisions based on misinformation spread by those with a vested interest in vaccines. We need to spread actual facts and continue protecting our fundamental human right to bodily autonomy.
Evidence points towards this being a PLandemic, not a Pandemic.
Thank you, Judy Wilyman ??


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--Learn from those with a PhD in Results not just those with a PHD in Theory

Learn from those with a PhD in Results not just those with a PhD in Theory Learn from those with @ @ @ @ @ just those with a PhD in Theory such as University lecturers – Jamie shares the @ @ @ @ @ he built a $ 1.3 billion business from a tiny internet business started in 2006 @ @ @ @

Learn from those with a PhD in Results not just those with a PhD in Theory
By Jamie McIntyre
Learn from those with a PhD in Results not just those with a PhD in Theory such as University lecturers – Jamie shares the story of a friend how he built a $1.3 billion business from a tiny internet business started in 2006 in Melbourne Australia.


australiannationalreview--2020-07-04--Australian Government knows COVID 19 tests aren’t accurate but fails to inform the public

Australian Government knows COVID 19 tests aren ’ t accurate but fails to inform the public


australiannationalreview--2020-07-06--Human trafficking creates Avenue for human rituals and organ harvesting


australiannationalreview--2020-07-06--Officials admit very few who are listed as dying of COVID 19 actually died from it.

Officials admit very few who are listed as dying of COVID-19 actually died from it .