australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”

Update : Some are struggling to grasp the point of this article .
It ’ s not a discussion of the difficulty of proving a negative , it ’ s the fact the CDC lied for years about something they claimed they factually and scientifically knew , when they did not .
Again , the CDC claimed the science was settled , when in reality there was no science .
THAT ’ s the story .
This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it , yet major media likely will not touch it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don ’ t cause autism ” – but instead , crickets .
Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories , and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know .
Of course , we also know that since independent media ’ s reach has been cut , getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you , the dear reader , to spread the word .
As of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has admitted in federal court documents that they do not have any evidence to support the claim that vaccines given to babies up to 6 months don ’ t cause autism .
For years they claimed that the studies had been done , the evidence was clear , and that there was a consensus : “ vaccines don ’ t cause autism.
” Yet , this was a lie .
An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network ( ICAN ) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission .
As they stated in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s strategy was to focus on vaccines given within the first 6 months of a baby ’ s life as per the standard schedule as this is when autism can start to be diagnosed .
It should further be reiterated that ICAN asked for studies to show that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines , i.e .
how they react together in the body , does not lead to autism .
In short , the CDC provided a list of 20 studies that were to claim these vaccines did not cause autism , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that .
Within the list of 20 , the CDC provided 18 studies that had nothing to do with the vaccines ICAN was focusing on .
This either means that the CDC does not have any studies , or they do not want to provide them .
The other two studies were interesting .
One was a review by the Institute of Medicine ( IOM ) , which was paid for by the CDC .
This study performed a comprehensive review of studies relating to the DTaP vaccine .
It was looking to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether or not vaccines do or do not cause autism .
The IOM was unable to identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism .
What this means is that the CDC does not have studies that show there is no link between these vaccines and autism , thus the CDC can not make the claim that vaccines don ’ t cause autism .
This , of course , doesn ’ t mean they are saying vaccines do cause autism .
The last of the remaining two studies focused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the bacteria or virus used in the vaccines .
The question was if there is more virus or more bacteria , would it increase the risk of autism ?
The study concluded that it made no difference how much bacteria or virus was used .
Further , in the conclusion of the study they admitted that the study doesn ’ t prove that vaccines don ’ t cause autism .
Ultimately , the CDC was asked to provide studies to prove that vaccines given with the first six months of life do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provide any , not one .
So how .
does the CDC make this claim on their website as you can see in the image below ?
They make that claim with no scientific backing and with no evidence .
It ’ s simply a statement .
Even if they have evidence that the MMR vaccine doesn ’ t cause autism , it doesn ’ t mean other vaccines don ’ t .
For years , the CDC falsely claimed that “ vaccines don ’ t cause autism.
” In turn , those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unscientific and extreme about their views , yet were they wrong to claim that vaccines may cause autism ?
Were they wrong to question the safety of vaccines ?
Sure , this does not prove that vaccines do cause autism , but that ’ s not the point .
The point is instead of doing the proper research and ensuring the public vaccines are safe , the CDC chose to lie and start a campaign of ridicule against those that questioned vaccines .
One could argue that if the CDC was being responsible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we don ’ t know ” when it comes to whether or not vaccines are linked to autism .
This is in fact the correct response to the question “ do vaccines cause autism ?
” This has been the correct response since many years ago when people began asking the question .
Instead , the CDC elected to claim that the science shows vaccines don ’ t cause autism , which was unscientific and dishonest .
The detail that hits close to home for us here at CE is that fact-checkers have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine content , stating that “ vaccines don ’ t cause autism.
” This has led to a reduction in our reach and the near-complete destruction of our business due to demonetization .
Yet , where did these fact-checkers get their information from ?
The CDC ?
And now we know , the CDC never had the evidence to make the claims they made about all vaccines , and the fact-checkers were in fact wrong or truly misinformed .
These false claims from the CDC have also effectively led to creating a culture @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no evidence they are safe .
This leads to the challenge not many are realizing about fact-checking organizations like Snopes , or the ones that work on Facebook ; what they do , is turn to major organizations and the government to get their ‘ facts.
’ And those facts overrule anything brought forth that challenges those ‘ facts.
’ So essentially fact-checkers are merely purveyors of facts produced by governments and major corporations .
Some also happen to be paid by major corporations .
One thing you will also notice is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that do link vaccines to autism .
Instead , only studies from experts they deem worthy are to be taken seriously .
There is an abundance of science showing that vaccines could be linked to autism , in many different ways .
Take aluminum for example , A study published in 2018 discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism : The fact that aluminum in adjuvant form does not exit the body as aluminum in our own food , for example , is one of multiple ways @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be implicated in the onset of autism .
You can read more about vaccines and aluminum specifically , here .
This is not the first time in history that major health organizations , scientists and doctors claimed that something was safe when it wasn ’ t .
Look at cigarettes , agent orange , and DDT .
These were just a few that became common knowledge after many people brought awareness forward about the dangers associated with these products .
All the while , the companies who owned them , and their cronies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , liars and wrong .
Are we seeing this now with vaccines ?
It sure seems to be following the same pattern .
One thing I always look at is if major organizations can not answer the simple question , and instead turn to ridicule , name-calling and media campaigns to cast doubt , then you know they are hiding something .
In my feeling , the CDC knows full well the dangers of vaccines , and they are buying time to figure out how to keep themselves clean for when the cards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of course , is all part of a greater awakening that is taking place amongst humanity right now as we collectively move from a state of childhood into adulthood .
Empowering ourselves as individuals , changing our relationship with the earth , each other , and ourselves .
Shifting the way we idolize and put money above everything else .
Of course , seeing past the deceptions of today is an early step in this evolution of consciousness .
I outline all of this in my 4 part video series about these @ @ @

By
Update: Some are struggling to grasp the point of this article. It’s not a discussion of the difficulty of proving a negative, it’s the fact the CDC lied for years about something they claimed they factually and scientifically knew, when they did not. Again, the CDC claimed the science was settled, when in reality there was no science. THAT’s the story.
Update 2: Health Feedback, a “fact checking” organization, has claimed this story is fake news. Their argument is completely illogical and does not accurately address the actual claims in this article. They instead point to other facts to make a point they seem to feel pressured to make. We are preparing a report to showcase how Health Feedback’s review of this content is both false, irresponsible and misleading to the public.
This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.
As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court documents that they do not have any evidence to support the claim that vaccines given to babies up to 6 months don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.
An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:
In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.
ICAN’s strategy was to focus on vaccines given within the first 6 months of a baby’s life as per the standard schedule as this is when autism can start to be diagnosed. It should further be reiterated that ICAN asked for studies to show that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines, i.e. how they react together in the body, does not lead to autism.
In short, the CDC provided a list of 20 studies that were to claim these vaccines did not cause autism, only, none of these studies proved that. Within the list of 20, the CDC provided 18 studies that had nothing to do with the vaccines ICAN was focusing on. This either means that the CDC does not have any studies, or they do not want to provide them. The other two studies were interesting. One was a review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), which was paid for by the CDC. This study performed a comprehensive review of studies relating to the DTaP vaccine. It was looking to determine general adverse reactions to vaccines including whether or not vaccines do or do not cause autism. The IOM was unable to identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism.
What this means is that the CDC does not have studies that show there is no link between these vaccines and autism, thus the CDC cannot make the claim that vaccines don’t cause autism. This, of course, doesn’t mean they are saying vaccines do cause autism.
The last of the remaining two studies focused on antigens found in vaccines. This is the bacteria or virus used in the vaccines. The question was if there is more virus or more bacteria, would it increase the risk of autism? The study concluded that it made no difference how much bacteria or virus was used. Further, in the conclusion of the study they admitted that the study doesn’t prove that vaccines don’t cause autism.
“It can be argued that ASD with regression, in which children usually lose developmental skills during the second year of life, could be related to exposure in infancy, inicluding vaccines; however, we found no association between exposure to antigens from vaccinees during infancy and the development of ASD withh regression.”
Ultimately, the CDC was asked to provide studies to prove that vaccines given with the first six months of life do not cause autism. They could not provide any, not one.
So how. does the CDC make this claim on their website as you can see in the image below?
They make that claim with no scientific backing and with no evidence. It’s simply a statement. Even if they have evidence that the MMR vaccine doesn’t cause autism, it doesn’t mean other vaccines don’t. For years, the CDC falsely claimed that “vaccines don’t cause autism.” In turn, those that questioned vaccines were called anti-vaxxers, unscientific and extreme about their views, yet were they wrong to claim that vaccines may cause autism? Were they wrong to question the safety of vaccines? Sure, this does not prove that vaccines do cause autism, but that’s not the point. The point is instead of doing the proper research and ensuring the public vaccines are safe, the CDC chose to lie and start a campaign of ridicule against those that questioned vaccines.
“We Don’t Know”
One could argue that if the CDC was being responsible and honest they would have said “we don’t know” when it comes to whether or not vaccines are linked to autism. This is in fact the correct response to the question “do vaccines cause autism?” This has been the correct response since many years ago when people began asking the question. Instead, the CDC elected to claim that the science shows vaccines don’t cause autism, which was unscientific and dishonest.
The detail that hits close to home for us here at CE is that fact-checkers have been handing out false claims about our vaccine content, stating that “vaccines don’t cause autism.” This has led to a reduction in our reach and the near-complete destruction of our business due to demonetization. Yet, where did these fact-checkers get their information from? The CDC? And now we know, the CDC never had the evidence to make the claims they made about all vaccines, and the fact-checkers were in fact wrong or truly misinformed. These false claims from the CDC have also effectively led to creating a culture of blind vaccine acceptance even though there is no evidence they are safe.
This leads to the challenge not many are realizing about fact-checking organizations like Snopes, or the ones that work on Facebook; what they do, is turn to major organizations and the government to get their ‘facts.’ And those facts overrule anything brought forth that challenges those ‘facts.’ So essentially fact-checkers are merely purveyors of facts produced by governments and major corporations. Some also happen to be paid by major corporations.
“The most recent data from CDC shows that 1 in 36 children born this year in the USA will develop autism,[…] This is a true epidemic. If the CDC had spent the same resources studying vaccines and autism, as it did waging a media campaign against parents that claim vaccines caused their child’s autism, the world would be a better place for everyone.” The CDC complains that those raising concerns about vaccine safety are unscientific and misinformed,” […]“But when we asked the CDC for studies to support its claim that ‘vaccines do not cause autism,’ it is clear that their claim is not grounded in science.” – Del Bigtree, Founder of ICAN
One thing you will also notice is that fact-checkers never address the studies provided that do link vaccines to autism. Instead, only studies from experts they deem worthy are to be taken seriously. There is an abundance of science showing that vaccines could be linked to autism, in many different ways. Take aluminum for example, A study published in 2018 discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism:
Human exposure to aluminium has been implicated in ASD with conclusions being equivocal [7], [8], [9], [10]. To-date the majority of studies have used hair as their indicator of human exposure to aluminium while aluminium in blood and urine have also been used to a much more limited extent. Paediatric vaccines that include an aluminium adjuvant are an indirect measure of infant exposure to aluminium and their burgeoning use has been directly correlated with increasing prevalence of ASD [11]. Animal models of ASD continue to support a connection with aluminium and to aluminium adjuvants used in human vaccinations in particular [12].
The fact that aluminum in adjuvant form does not exit the body as aluminum in our own food, for example, is one of multiple ways that scientists have shown how vaccines could be implicated in the onset of autism. You can read more about vaccines and aluminum specifically, here.
The Takeaway
This is not the first time in history that major health organizations, scientists and doctors claimed that something was safe when it wasn’t. Look at cigarettes, agent orange, and DDT. These were just a few that became common knowledge after many people brought awareness forward about the dangers associated with these products. All the while, the companies who owned them, and their cronies fought to claim these people were unscientific, liars and wrong.
Are we seeing this now with vaccines? It sure seems to be following the same pattern. One thing I always look at is if major organizations cannot answer the simple question, and instead turn to ridicule, name-calling and media campaigns to cast doubt, then you know they are hiding something. In my feeling, the CDC knows full well the dangers of vaccines, and they are buying time to figure out how to keep themselves clean for when the cards fall. Because they will.
This, of course, is all part of a greater awakening that is taking place amongst humanity right now as we collectively move from a state of childhood into adulthood. Empowering ourselves as individuals, changing our relationship with the earth, each other, and ourselves. Shifting the way we idolize and put money above everything else. Of course, seeing past the deceptions of today is an early step in this evolution of consciousness. I outline all of this in my 4 part video series about these ongoing changes.


Coronavirus covert operation

In my ongoing coverage of the “ epidemic ” ( archive here ) , I ’ ve written about the covert-operation aspect of the brutal game .
I want to add a few notes .
By its very nature , a covert op is meant to CONCEAL its true goals and details and players , so it ’ s no surprise we have unanswered questions .
Rushing to supply all the answers in five minutes is a futile exercise .
A covert op can be invented and planned from the get-go ; or players , seeing an event unfold , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control , and use the event to launch an operation .
A covert op has cover stories and false trails .
These are standard in the intelligence business .
A cover story is designed to divert attention from what is actually going on .
It is basically a false picture floated to obscure the truth .
The intent is : get people dividing into camps and arguing with each other about VARIATIONS of the cover story—thus taking them further from the hidden facts and motives .
In this case , the cover story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ species in China and started harming and killing people ; it ’ s spread .
People began taking sides : the contagious coronavirus is a natural microbe ; it ’ s a leak from a biowar lab ; it was weaponized in a lab and intentionally released ; it ’ s rather harmless for the most part ; it ’ s deadly ; its effects are somehow magnified by interacting with chemtrails ; because people are dying , the virus must be the cause , etc .
Once people have divided into camps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these cover-story variations , thus creating false trails , down which people can travel , without ever reaching an end .
For example , a loose study might appear “ which proves the coronavirus is a bioweapon.
” If you read the study carefully , though , you realize the authors aren ’ t claiming the virus has been weaponized .
Further , the study authors are saying the virus has a peculiarity which MIGHT mean THIS or COULD mean THAT or POSSIBLY IMPLIES something else .
And there appear to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these equivocal findings .
But within an hour of the study being published , fifty thousand people on the Web are circulating this “ proof of weaponization.
” In any so-called epidemic , you will see some ex-military or ex-intelligence spook appear out of nowhere with “ expert insider testimony ” about the virus .
He “ knows it ’ s a weapon.
” Therefore , it must be .
Likewise , other authority figures will show up to capture audiences with unproven revelations about the “ bioweapon virus , ” or “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lab , ” or the “ theft of the virus.
” Their audience , having rejected conventional media and government authorities , is looking for alternative substitutes .
And they ’ ll get substitutes .
Notice that , in all these insider pronouncements , whatever they are , there is a re-enforcement of the basic idea that THE VIRUS is the cause of the “ epidemic.
” BUT REMEMBER , “ THE VIRUS ” IS THE BASIC COVER STORY .
Planners of a covert op want people to buy the basic cover any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , imagine that , in an area of forest 30 miles from a town , people discover a large patch of dead trees .
Some have fallen over .
Others , leafless and gray , are still standing .
At first , no one takes action .
Then , it ’ s obvious the patch is growing larger .
More trees are falling down .
More branches and leaves are drying up and dropping on the ground .
The town newspaper , aided by pronouncements from local officials , runs a story about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in that part of the forest .
It was “ so severe and hot , its effects are still being felt.
” NOW , people begin arguing about the cause of the fire .
It was a lightning hit .
Someone set a blaze , using flammable liquid that burned at an exceptionally high temperature .
Drug dealers fought with one another and burned up the drugs .
A sinister creature , half-animal , half-human , rumored to live in the woods , set the fire .
ET aliens set the blaze .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ The fire is the cover story .
People are arguing about variations of the basic cover .
Actually , six months ago , a town firm that secretly sells a dangerous and illegal pesticide , believing they were about to get busted , sent employees with drums of the poison into the forest to dump them .
That ’ s what happened .
But the cover story is now so ingrained in minds , few people will consider there was no fire…THERE HAD TO BE A FIRE .
After having researched and written @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Flu , Ebola , Zika , etc . )
for many years , I ’ ve taken a different approach .
I ’ ve asked more BASIC questions at every turn .
If public health officials and governments announce an outbreak and a virus , I ask , “ How did they discover the new virus ?
” That ’ s a reasonable inquiry .
“ Did they really find and isolate a new virus ?
” “ What procedures did they use for the job ?
” “ Are those procedures accurate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientists who rushed to the outbreak-locale to take tissue samples—are these the CDC or World Health Organization virus hunters who always find a new virus , even if , at the designated location , an industrial corporation is releasing torrents of polluted poison into the ground and the water ?
Which leads me to my next basic question : assuming some harm is being visited on people , are there clear causes that have nothing to do with a virus , causes that would account for the profile of harm that has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would benefit from hiding these other clear causes by using the cover story of a virus ?
Corporations , governments ?
Who would benefit , on the back end , from the virus cover story ?
Drug companies ?
Vaccine companies ?
I ask : how many cases of the “ epidemic ” have been announced ?
How many deaths ?
Exactly how are these cases being identified and counted ?
What diagnostic tests are being done ?
Are the tests accurate and valid ?
Again , this is a reasonable inquiry .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of people are being harmed , I want to find out HOW these “ experts ” are coming to that conclusion .
I ask : what is the list of symptoms being attributed to the “ epidemic illness ?
” Are these symptoms so generalized they already fit large numbers of people without the claim that the cause is a new virus ?
For example , are typical flu-like symptoms , which apply to millions of people , suddenly being shifted over and counted as cases of the “ new epidemic ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ epidemics , are there common , long-accepted medical tests and procedures which are arbitrary and unproven , which should be openly debated , but aren ’ t ?
Is the story of a virus used to hide corporate and government crimes ?
There are other questions I ask , but you get the idea .
I go under the cover story of the moment and look for more fundamental lies and truths .
I hit the “ stress points ” of the cover story .
These basic questions have generated all my previous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” I keep asking , looking , and answering .
If I find out , in asking and answering these questions that , yes , questionable procedures have been used in discovering the new virus in the first place ; unworkable , dubious , and worthless tests have been used to diagnose and label patients with the epidemic disease ; cases are undoubtedly “ imported ” from traditional diseases , in order to falsely inflate the number of cases in the epidemic ; causes of illness , other than the virus , are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ started ; the epidemic illness is a familiar generalized list of symptoms which are present in millions of people—if I find out all these things , then the “ new epidemic ” with a new viral cause is a con job .
If , after stripping away the number of people claimed to be “ epidemic cases ” who most likely aren ’ t , I find that the true number of cases appears to be small , then there is no epidemic .
If the number of cases still seems to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ non-viral causes which are currently operating , and influencing illness .
For my findings on this “ coronavirus epidemic , ” I suggest going back and reading all my articles in this ongoing series ( archive here ) .
For those who have been with me from the beginning , I thank you for your support and interest .
I ’ ll close this piece with an example .
In 2003 , there was another coronavirus epidemic : SARS .
Its symptoms were basic flu with , in some cases , acute respiratory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a Canadian biologist , Frank Plummer , working for the World Health Organization , spoke frankly to the press , saying the number of SARS patients with the coronavirus was fewer and fewer .
In fact , it was approaching zero .
This , obviously , cut the legs out from under the claim that SARS was a new disease caused by a new coronavirus .
Where did SARS begin ?
Where was it first found ?
Guangdong , China .
In their excellent book , Virus Mania , Torsten Engelbrecht and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illness in that locale .
They found causes .
It turns out this area is one of the world ’ s largest re-cyclers of e-waste : “ Guangdong is China ’ s largest industrial area…extremely polluted .
Garbage lies everywhere ; above all high-tech waste…For $ 1.50 a day , locals disassemble computers , monitors and printers with their bare hands , endangering both their own health and the environment… There , workers empty toner cartridges from laser printers the whole day long without protective masks , breathing in fine carbon dust .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ dip circuit boards into baths of liquid lead to separate and collect the soldering materials with which the memory chips and processors are attached to the plates .
Unprotected , they are exposed to toxic fumes .
While the plastic plates are simply burned up , the chips and processors are put in acid baths , to extract their gold .
Here as well , poisonous fumes are generated , and the unusable leftover acids are just dumped into the river .
A lot of garbage is simply burned up or dumped onto @ @ @ @ @ @ @ waterways .
The bodies of water and groundwater around Guiys have become so contaminated that drinking water has to be brought in daily from other cities… ”

by Jon Rappoport
In my ongoing coverage of the “epidemic” (archive here), I’ve written about the covert-operation aspect of the brutal game.
I want to add a few notes.
By its very nature, a covert op is meant to CONCEAL its true goals and details and players, so it’s no surprise we have unanswered questions. Rushing to supply all the answers in five minutes is a futile exercise.
A covert op can be invented and planned from the get-go; or players, seeing an event unfold, can jump onboard in mid-stream, take control, and use the event to launch an operation.
A covert op has cover stories and false trails. These are standard in the intelligence business.
A cover story is designed to divert attention from what is actually going on. It is basically a false picture floated to obscure the truth. The intent is: get people dividing into camps and arguing with each other about VARIATIONS of the cover story—thus taking them further from the hidden facts and motives.
In this case, the cover story would be: a contagious virus jumped species in China and started harming and killing people; it’s spread.
People began taking sides: the contagious coronavirus is a natural microbe; it’s a leak from a biowar lab; it was weaponized in a lab and intentionally released; it’s rather harmless for the most part; it’s deadly; its effects are somehow magnified by interacting with chemtrails; because people are dying, the virus must be the cause, etc.
Once people have divided into camps, the covert operators can twist several of these cover-story variations, thus creating false trails, down which people can travel, without ever reaching an end.
For example, a loose study might appear “which proves the coronavirus is a bioweapon.” If you read the study carefully, though, you realize the authors aren’t claiming the virus has been weaponized. Further, the study authors are saying the virus has a peculiarity which MIGHT mean THIS or COULD mean THAT or POSSIBLY IMPLIES something else. And there appear to be no other studies which confirm any of these equivocal findings.
But within an hour of the study being published, fifty thousand people on the Web are circulating this “proof of weaponization.”
In any so-called epidemic, you will see some ex-military or ex-intelligence spook appear out of nowhere with “expert insider testimony” about the virus. He “knows it’s a weapon.” Therefore, it must be.
Likewise, other authority figures will show up to capture audiences with unproven revelations about the “bioweapon virus,” or “the leak of the virus from a lab,” or the “theft of the virus.” Their audience, having rejected conventional media and government authorities, is looking for alternative substitutes. And they’ll get substitutes.
Notice that, in all these insider pronouncements, whatever they are, there is a re-enforcement of the basic idea that THE VIRUS is the cause of the “epidemic.” BUT REMEMBER, “THE VIRUS” IS THE BASIC COVER STORY. Planners of a covert op want people to buy the basic cover any which way.
To illustrate these points, imagine that, in an area of forest 30 miles from a town, people discover a large patch of dead trees. Some have fallen over. Others, leafless and gray, are still standing. At first, no one takes action. Then, it’s obvious the patch is growing larger. More trees are falling down. More branches and leaves are drying up and dropping on the ground.
The town newspaper, aided by pronouncements from local officials, runs a story about a fire. There was a fire in that part of the forest. It was “so severe and hot, its effects are still being felt.” NOW, people begin arguing about the cause of the fire. It was a lightning hit. Someone set a blaze, using flammable liquid that burned at an exceptionally high temperature. Drug dealers fought with one another and burned up the drugs. A sinister creature, half-animal, half-human, rumored to live in the woods, set the fire. ET aliens set the blaze. Their small ship crashed and burned.
The fire is the cover story. People are arguing about variations of the basic cover. Actually, six months ago, a town firm that secretly sells a dangerous and illegal pesticide, believing they were about to get busted, sent employees with drums of the poison into the forest to dump them. That’s what happened. But the cover story is now so ingrained in minds, few people will consider there was no fire…THERE HAD TO BE A FIRE.
After having researched and written about epidemic duds (SARS, Swine Flu, Ebola, Zika, etc.) for many years, I’ve taken a different approach.
I’ve asked more BASIC questions at every turn.
If public health officials and governments announce an outbreak and a virus, I ask, “How did they discover the new virus?” That’s a reasonable inquiry. “Did they really find and isolate a new virus?” “What procedures did they use for the job?” “Are those procedures accurate and valid?” “Did the scientists who rushed to the outbreak-locale to take tissue samples—are these the CDC or World Health Organization virus hunters who always find a new virus, even if, at the designated location, an industrial corporation is releasing torrents of polluted poison into the ground and the water?
Which leads me to my next basic question: assuming some harm is being visited on people, are there clear causes that have nothing to do with a virus, causes that would account for the profile of harm that has been announced? And if so, who would benefit from hiding these other clear causes by using the cover story of a virus? Corporations, governments? Who would benefit, on the back end, from the virus cover story? Drug companies? Vaccine companies?
I ask: how many cases of the “epidemic” have been announced? How many deaths? Exactly how are these cases being identified and counted? What diagnostic tests are being done? Are the tests accurate and valid? Again, this is a reasonable inquiry. If the authorities are claiming a certain number of people are being harmed, I want to find out HOW these “experts” are coming to that conclusion.
I ask: what is the list of symptoms being attributed to the “epidemic illness?” Are these symptoms so generalized they already fit large numbers of people without the claim that the cause is a new virus? For example, are typical flu-like symptoms, which apply to millions of people, suddenly being shifted over and counted as cases of the “new epidemic?”
I ask: in all modern epidemics, are there common, long-accepted medical tests and procedures which are arbitrary and unproven, which should be openly debated, but aren’t? Is the story of a virus used to hide corporate and government crimes?
There are other questions I ask, but you get the idea. I go under the cover story of the moment and look for more fundamental lies and truths. I hit the “stress points” of the cover story.
These basic questions have generated all my previous articles on the current “coronavirus crisis.”
I keep asking, looking, and answering.
If I find out, in asking and answering these questions that, yes, questionable procedures have been used in discovering the new virus in the first place; unworkable, dubious, and worthless tests have been used to diagnose and label patients with the epidemic disease; cases are undoubtedly “imported” from traditional diseases, in order to falsely inflate the number of cases in the epidemic; causes of illness, other than the virus, are present in an area where the epidemic started; the epidemic illness is a familiar generalized list of symptoms which are present in millions of people—if I find out all these things, then the “new epidemic” with a new viral cause is a con job.
If, after stripping away the number of people claimed to be “epidemic cases” who most likely aren’t, I find that the true number of cases appears to be small, then there is no epidemic.
If the number of cases still seems to be high, then I look deeper into non-viral causes which are currently operating, and influencing illness.
For my findings on this “coronavirus epidemic,” I suggest going back and reading all my articles in this ongoing series (archive here).
For those who have been with me from the beginning, I thank you for your support and interest.
I’ll close this piece with an example. In 2003, there was another coronavirus epidemic: SARS. Its symptoms were basic flu with, in some cases, acute respiratory problems.
As I’ve detailed, a Canadian biologist, Frank Plummer, working for the World Health Organization, spoke frankly to the press, saying the number of SARS patients with the coronavirus was fewer and fewer. In fact, it was approaching zero. This, obviously, cut the legs out from under the claim that SARS was a new disease caused by a new coronavirus.
Where did SARS begin? Where was it first found? Guangdong, China. In their excellent book, Virus Mania, Torsten Engelbrecht and Claus Kohnlein explore non-virus causes of flu-like illness in that locale. They found causes. It turns out this area is one of the world’s largest re-cyclers of e-waste:
“Guangdong is China’s largest industrial area…extremely polluted. Garbage lies everywhere; above all high-tech waste…For $1.50 a day, locals disassemble computers, monitors and printers with their bare hands, endangering both their own health and the environment… There, workers empty toner cartridges from laser printers the whole day long without protective masks, breathing in fine carbon dust. Others, mostly women and girls, dip circuit boards into baths of liquid lead to separate and collect the soldering materials with which the memory chips and processors are attached to the plates. Unprotected, they are exposed to toxic fumes. While the plastic plates are simply burned up, the chips and processors are put in acid baths, to extract their gold. Here as well, poisonous fumes are generated, and the unusable leftover acids are just dumped into the river. A lot of garbage is simply burned up or dumped onto rice fields, irrigation facilities or into waterways. The bodies of water and groundwater around Guiys have become so contaminated that drinking water has to be brought in daily from other cities…”


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--How to stage a fake epidemic (and brainwash billions of people)

“ When gigantic mega-corporations steal land from Third World people and then poison these people with horrific pollution , why isn ’ t it called murder ?
Is that too stark ?
Does it offend delicate sensibilities ?
Would you say that a drug gang who shoots up a bar and kills ten innocent bystanders is just carrying out ‘ typical business practices in their field of endeavor ’ , and should therefore never be prosecuted in a court of law on a charge of homicide ?
” ( The Underground , Jon Rappoport ) —This article assembles facts contained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China epidemic.
” To get the details , I recommend going back and reading all those articles ( archive here ) .
If a group wants to stage a fake and frightening epidemic , how would they do it ?
First of all , what reasons would they have to launch such an audacious plan ?
On one level , they want to cover up human harm that is already occurring .
They want to explain this harm with a false story .
For example , suppose a combination of deadly corporate air @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making people sick and killing them .
The parties responsible are surely not going to admit their crimes .
No .
Instead , they ’ re going to claim a new virus is causing this harm in the form of , say , lung disease .
The virus just “ emerged.
” “ It showed up out of nowhere .
It crossed species from animals to humans.
” So…the first thing needed is a cluster of cases in one locale .
A small group of people who have the same symptoms .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ordinary flu symptoms ?
Fever , fatigue , weakness , with an emphasis on lung complications [ from the forms of pollution ] .
A few of these people are very ill. Two of them die .
Now , the publicity/news machine swings into gear .
It ’ s called an “ outbreak.
” It isn ’ t , but that ’ s the story .
“ They were all ‘ exposed to something ’ ” at , say , a riverfront dock restaurant .
The news—shoveled directly into mainstream outlets—comes from elite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the World Health Organization ( WHO ) .
To use a technical term , this is all BULLSHIT .
Understand ?
People in the locale of the “ new case cluster ” are falling ill and dying as a result of the actual pollution-causes I listed above .
But the news takes a different slant : “ Researchers from WHO and CDC state that a ‘ mystery illness ’ has emerged in City X , and they are working to discover the virus… ” Who said it was a virus ?
Who made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They always say it ’ s a virus .
At this point , suddenly , it ’ s news all over the planet , and most of the population is roped in , right from the get-go .
Virus .
Yes .
I see .
Which virus ?
And shortly and miraculously , the answer comes : it ’ s VX-20 .
A new virus , never seen before , “ which probably emerged from fish and crossed over into humans .
One fisherman has already died.
” Voila .
We have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question : did researchers actually find this virus ?
Did they ?
Follow the next piece closely .
There is sleight-of-hand involved .
One scenario : Researchers used what are called “ indirect markers ” to INFER that a new virus was there , in samples of tissue taken from several people in the original “ cluster ” of riverfront victims .
The researchers didn ’ t actually use basic procedures to purify the tissue sample from even one patient , and they didn ’ t see MANY identical viruses in an electron @ @ @ @ @ @ @ took such a photograph at all .
They certainly didn ’ t perform this complete test on several hundred emerging patients—they should have , but they didn ’ t .
And most certainly , other researchers , including INDEPENDENT analysts , didn ’ t perform the necessary electron microscope test on hundreds of so-called “ epidemic patients.
” So…the CDC and WHO researchers came up with a notion , an idea , an inference about a virus , through these indirect markers .
And via a process of continuing inferences , they characterized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two : Let ’ s be generous and assume the researchers did bother to look at electron microscope photos , derived from only a few patients , not hundreds of patients , as they should have .
What did they actually see in the photos ?
Maybe they saw a few particles that looked similar to each other , BUT quite possibly these virus-like particles were just passengers that ordinarily live in the body and cause no harm .
However , the researchers jump up and down and say , THIS IS IT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
AND WE WILL NOW ASSEMBLE ITS GENETIC SEQUENCE .
AND THEY DO .
So what ?
These researchers don ’ t bother to make the distinction between viruses that might do harm and those that do nothing .
Why ?
Because they ’ re determined to find something .
Anything .
That ’ s their basic mission .
In both scenarios , they ’ ve fallen woefully short of proving that a new virus is responsible for making people ill .
But never mind—news outlets and governments are already on the march @ @ @ @ @ @ @ epidemic .
VX-20 .
A whole city is already locked down .
Screeners are waving wands at passengers getting off planes .
Some US talking head is saying there is now a rush to develop a vaccine .
New cases of VX-20 are showing up in other cities and other countries .
Boom .
Let ’ s examine that last part , about new cases and “ spreading ” — because this is where people REALLY fall for the con .
They say : “ Well , here is a city where there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pollution , and they ’ re discovering new cases , so how do you explain that ?
” The new cases and the spread are based entirely on DIAGNOSTIC TESTS .
Those test-results determine whether there is an “ epidemic case ” or a “ spread.
” There are two main tests : antibody and PCR .
In a nutshell , neither test is adequate to say HERE IS A NEW CASE .
Both tests are unreliable and worthless .
It ’ s more of the con .
Both tests will claim to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DON ’ T .
They might show some antibodies or a few tiny fragments of what might possibly be a virus , but they show NOTHING that directly points to human illness .
Relying on those tests would be on the order of laying down a bet on a game that isn ’ t even scheduled .
It ’ s a farce .
Antibody tests , which purport to prove illness coming from a virus , are actually showing , at best , that the patient came in contact with a virus .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ generally taken to mean the patient was in good shape .
His immune system had defeated the germ .
But then , for several no good reasons , the science was turned on its head .
All of a sudden , a positive antibody test was taken to mean the patient was ill or would soon become ill .
Nonsense .
Farce .
The PCR test takes a tiny , tiny sample from a patient that might contain a virus , but the virus particle is far too small to comprehend .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so it can be analyzed .
BUT the test says nothing about HOW MUCH virus , if any , is replicating in the patient ’ s body .
And you need millions and millions of a virus replicating in the body to even begin talking about a cause of actual illness .
AND both tests rely on the unwarranted assumption that a virus actually causing illness—VX-20—was truly discovered in the first place .
Armed with these pathetic tests , public officials begin reporting a new epidemic case here and a new one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have new cases , and the public falls for it , hook , line , and sinker .
And THAT ’ S HOW you stage a fake epidemic .
The rest is pure publicity and lockdown and theater .
Toxic drugs and toxic vaccines will be brought on board to treat the epidemic that was never there .
The ACTUAL ONGOING causes of illness and dying will remain in place , shoved into the deep background .
And THIS amounts to a capital crime .
As in : murder .
Remember that .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the official line on the “ epidemic.
” This is called a clue .
Why not ask questions ?
Because the answers might lead to a correct conclusion about the enormous con job .
Let me add a few comments .
The World Health Organization itself states that every year , there are millions of cases of ordinary flu around the world , and several hundred thousand deaths .
This isn ’ t “ coronavirus.
” But the flu sufferers can easily be called “ new epidemic cases.
” Ordinary flu can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus.
” Then there is the medical treatment imposed on people who are told they are “ coronavirus cases.
” I ’ m talking about highly toxic antiviral drugs , which have the ability to stop natural reproduction of cells in the body .
Particularly when such people already have weakened immune systems , or organ-function problems , the results can be catastrophic .
The patients can die .
Of course , if they do , they will be called “ deaths from the epidemic.
” Finally , there is something else you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it a few paragraphs ago : murder .
Do you really think the people who are consciously launching a fake epidemic , with all its consequences—including covering up and never remedying ongoing real causes of dying and death—would stop short of staging a few spectacular incidents of dying and death , in order to make a splash and convince the public that the virus is really a killer ?
Are you KIDDING ?
For example , suddenly , out of the blue , a few friends , previously healthy , in a small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ few days later , they ’ re dead .
Health officials state they were “ positive for the virus.
” “ It came on quickly.
” Are tests run to detect an intentional covert act of direct poisoning ?
Of course not .
Media blare this horrible story all over the world : “ THE VIRUS IS ON THE MOVE.
” Same thing happens to a previously healthy family in Country X .
They fall ill and die .
And then a group of travelers on a mountain in Country Y become ill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cover story is : “ THE VIRUS KNOWS NO BOUNDS .
IT CAN COME ON ANYWHERE , AT ANY TIME.
” THESE EVENTS OF DEATH “ CAN ONLY BE EXPLAINED BY THE VIRUS.
” That ’ s right , when the audience is brainwashed and completely naïve .
“ But…but how could anyone actually commit premediated murder of innocent people , in order to convince the public that a virus is spreading in unlikely places ?
” As I mentioned , such controllers are ALREADY guilty of murder , because they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death with the cover story of a virus .
This sort of cover-up of crime has been happening , around the world , for a long , long time .
To cite just two instances , look at parts of Africa and Haiti , where the “ HIV story ” has been promoted and funded , wall to wall , in order to conceal intentionally created and sustained poverty , stolen farm land , and corporate takeovers involving massive poisonous industrial pollution .
When you go back in history—as I have—you ’ ll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ procedure .
SARS , Swine Flu , West Nile , Zika , etc .
I ’ ve written about every one of these phonies in detail… ( * ) Concerning 5G technology and China , I recommend watching Dana Ashlie ’ s video , “ The BEST NEWS re CΟRΟNΑ VΙrus you ’ ve heard all month !
Kinda .
”

by Jon Rappoport
“When gigantic mega-corporations steal land from Third World people and then poison these people with horrific pollution, why isn’t it called murder? Is that too stark? Does it offend delicate sensibilities? Would you say that a drug gang who shoots up a bar and kills ten innocent bystanders is just carrying out ‘typical business practices in their field of endeavor’, and should therefore never be prosecuted in a court of law on a charge of homicide?” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
—This article assembles facts contained in my ongoing series on the “China epidemic.” To get the details, I recommend going back and reading all those articles (archive here).
If a group wants to stage a fake and frightening epidemic, how would they do it?
First of all, what reasons would they have to launch such an audacious plan?
On one level, they want to cover up human harm that is already occurring. They want to explain this harm with a false story. For example, suppose a combination of deadly corporate air and water and 5G* electronic pollution is making people sick and killing them. The parties responsible are surely not going to admit their crimes. No. Instead, they’re going to claim a new virus is causing this harm in the form of, say, lung disease. The virus just “emerged.” “It showed up out of nowhere. It crossed species from animals to humans.”
So…the first thing needed is a cluster of cases in one locale. A small group of people who have the same symptoms. This is easy to find. How about ordinary flu symptoms? Fever, fatigue, weakness, with an emphasis on lung complications [from the forms of pollution]. A few of these people are very ill. Two of them die. Now, the publicity/news machine swings into gear.
It’s called an “outbreak.” It isn’t, but that’s the story. “They were all ‘exposed to something’” at, say, a riverfront dock restaurant.
The news—shoveled directly into mainstream outlets—comes from elite public health agencies like the CDC and the World Health Organization (WHO).
It’s an OUTBREAK.
To use a technical term, this is all BULLSHIT. Understand? People in the locale of the “new case cluster” are falling ill and dying as a result of the actual pollution-causes I listed above. But the news takes a different slant: “Researchers from WHO and CDC state that a ‘mystery illness’ has emerged in City X, and they are working to discover the virus…”
Who said it was a virus? Who made that unwarranted assumption? WHO and CDC. They always say it’s a virus.
At this point, suddenly, it’s news all over the planet, and most of the population is roped in, right from the get-go. Virus. Yes. I see. Which virus?
And shortly and miraculously, the answer comes: it’s VX-20. A new virus, never seen before, “which probably emerged from fish and crossed over into humans. One fisherman has already died.”
Voila. We have a new disease. VX-20.
Next question: did researchers actually find this virus? Did they?
Follow the next piece closely. There is sleight-of-hand involved.
One scenario: Researchers used what are called “indirect markers” to INFER that a new virus was there, in samples of tissue taken from several people in the original “cluster” of riverfront victims.
The researchers didn’t actually use basic procedures to purify the tissue sample from even one patient, and they didn’t see MANY identical viruses in an electron microscope photograph of the purified sample—if they took such a photograph at all. They certainly didn’t perform this complete test on several hundred emerging patients—they should have, but they didn’t. And most certainly, other researchers, including INDEPENDENT analysts, didn’t perform the necessary electron microscope test on hundreds of so-called “epidemic patients.”
So…the CDC and WHO researchers came up with a notion, an idea, an inference about a virus, through these indirect markers. And via a process of continuing inferences, they characterized the virus they never saw.
Scenario two: Let’s be generous and assume the researchers did bother to look at electron microscope photos, derived from only a few patients, not hundreds of patients, as they should have. What did they actually see in the photos? Maybe they saw a few particles that looked similar to each other, BUT quite possibly these virus-like particles were just passengers that ordinarily live in the body and cause no harm. However, the researchers jump up and down and say, THIS IS IT. THIS IS THE NEW KILLING VIRUS. AND WE WILL NOW ASSEMBLE ITS GENETIC SEQUENCE.
AND THEY DO.
So what? These researchers don’t bother to make the distinction between viruses that might do harm and those that do nothing. Why? Because they’re determined to find something. Anything. That’s their basic mission.
In both scenarios, they’ve fallen woefully short of proving that a new virus is responsible for making people ill.
But never mind—news outlets and governments are already on the march. THIS IS IT. A new epidemic. VX-20. A whole city is already locked down. Screeners are waving wands at passengers getting off planes. Some US talking head is saying there is now a rush to develop a vaccine. New cases of VX-20 are showing up in other cities and other countries. Boom.
Let’s examine that last part, about new cases and “spreading”— because this is where people REALLY fall for the con. They say: “Well, here is a city where there is no air or water or 5G pollution, and they’re discovering new cases, so how do you explain that?”
The new cases and the spread are based entirely on DIAGNOSTIC TESTS. Those test-results determine whether there is an “epidemic case” or a “spread.”
There are two main tests: antibody and PCR. In a nutshell, neither test is adequate to say HERE IS A NEW CASE. Both tests are unreliable and worthless. It’s more of the con. Both tests will claim to show “new cases” when they DON’T. They might show some antibodies or a few tiny fragments of what might possibly be a virus, but they show NOTHING that directly points to human illness. Relying on those tests would be on the order of laying down a bet on a game that isn’t even scheduled. It’s a farce.
Antibody tests, which purport to prove illness coming from a virus, are actually showing, at best, that the patient came in contact with a virus. Actually, before 1984, this was generally taken to mean the patient was in good shape. His immune system had defeated the germ. But then, for several no good reasons, the science was turned on its head. All of a sudden, a positive antibody test was taken to mean the patient was ill or would soon become ill. Nonsense. Farce.
The PCR test takes a tiny, tiny sample from a patient that might contain a virus, but the virus particle is far too small to comprehend. The PCR blows up that particle many times, so it can be analyzed. BUT the test says nothing about HOW MUCH virus, if any, is replicating in the patient’s body. And you need millions and millions of a virus replicating in the body to even begin talking about a cause of actual illness.
AND both tests rely on the unwarranted assumption that a virus actually causing illness—VX-20—was truly discovered in the first place.
Armed with these pathetic tests, public officials begin reporting a new epidemic case here and a new one there, and pretty soon 40 countries have new cases, and the public falls for it, hook, line, and sinker.
And THAT’S HOW you stage a fake epidemic. The rest is pure publicity and lockdown and theater.
Dangerous theater.
Toxic drugs and toxic vaccines will be brought on board to treat the epidemic that was never there.
The ACTUAL ONGOING causes of illness and dying will remain in place, shoved into the deep background. And THIS amounts to a capital crime. As in: murder. Remember that.
People will be told not to question the official line on the “epidemic.” This is called a clue. Why not ask questions? Because the answers might lead to a correct conclusion about the enormous con job.
Let me add a few comments.
The World Health Organization itself states that every year, there are millions of cases of ordinary flu around the world, and several hundred thousand deaths. This isn’t “coronavirus.” But the flu sufferers can easily be called “new epidemic cases.” Ordinary flu can be statistically “imported” and called “coronavirus.”
Then there is the medical treatment imposed on people who are told they are “coronavirus cases.” I’m talking about highly toxic antiviral drugs, which have the ability to stop natural reproduction of cells in the body. Particularly when such people already have weakened immune systems, or organ-function problems, the results can be catastrophic. The patients can die. Of course, if they do, they will be called “deaths from the epidemic.”
Finally, there is something else you may have heard of. I mentioned it a few paragraphs ago: murder. Do you really think the people who are consciously launching a fake epidemic, with all its consequences—including covering up and never remedying ongoing real causes of dying and death—would stop short of staging a few spectacular incidents of dying and death, in order to make a splash and convince the public that the virus is really a killer? Are you KIDDING? For example, suddenly, out of the blue, a few friends, previously healthy, in a small town, fall ill, and a few days later, they’re dead. Health officials state they were “positive for the virus.” “It came on quickly.” Are tests run to detect an intentional covert act of direct poisoning? Of course not. Media blare this horrible story all over the world: “THE VIRUS IS ON THE MOVE.” Same thing happens to a previously healthy family in Country X. They fall ill and die. And then a group of travelers on a mountain in Country Y become ill and die. Murder. However, the cover story is: “THE VIRUS KNOWS NO BOUNDS. IT CAN COME ON ANYWHERE, AT ANY TIME.” THESE EVENTS OF DEATH “CAN ONLY BE EXPLAINED BY THE VIRUS.” That’s right, when the audience is brainwashed and completely naïve.
“But…but how could anyone actually commit premediated murder of innocent people, in order to convince the public that a virus is spreading in unlikely places?”
As I mentioned, such controllers are ALREADY guilty of murder, because they’re hiding the actual ongoing causes of death with the cover story of a virus. This sort of cover-up of crime has been happening, around the world, for a long, long time. To cite just two instances, look at parts of Africa and Haiti, where the “HIV story” has been promoted and funded, wall to wall, in order to conceal intentionally created and sustained poverty, stolen farm land, and corporate takeovers involving massive poisonous industrial pollution.
When you go back in history—as I have—you’ll realize that fake epidemics are standard operating procedure. SARS, Swine Flu, West Nile, Zika, etc. I’ve written about every one of these phonies in detail…
(*) Concerning 5G technology and China, I recommend watching Dana Ashlie’s video, “The BEST NEWS re CΟRΟNΑ VΙrus you’ve heard all month! Kinda.”


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--Damn! Will the Zombie Virus Apocalypse never come?

I write this piece for those who ordinarily have their heads on straight , when it comes to understanding the basics of HEALTH—but now , because of the “ coronavirus epidemic , ” are drifting back into the medical model : FIXATION ON GERMS .
A correct reading of suppressed medical history reveals that the hypothesis of “ one disease , one germ ” is a modern con , moving down a blind alley at midnight .
And when you add “ one vaccine ” to the formula , you get an even greater degree of lunacy .
But you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I don ’ t care how many contemporary molecular biologists are working in labs , amplifying invisible slivers of who knows what molecules into view , and calling them viruses ; it ’ s a con .
This also applies to biowar biologists trying to create super-germs .
They ’ re all working in the dark vis-à-vis the natural processes of the body , which are far more complex and far more protective of health than these scientists know—unless the body is interfered with by direct poisons or gross mechanical destruction .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in public sanitation , hygiene , and improved nutrition have done more for people than all the “ germ-fighting ” pharmaceutical interventions ever invented laid end to end .
But THAT is not a trillion-dollar commercial success .
Even when tissue samples are taken from the body , properly separated through centrifuge , and then observed under an electron microscope , by the most competent and honest researchers , you still get dead pictures of dead particles .
As researcher Karma Singh has pointed out , you don ’ t know , from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or don ’ t do when they ’ re alive and integrated in the body .
You can ’ t infer that they cause disease .
The whole operation of the Virus Hunters is one brassy late-night infomercial tap dancing in the long , long history of humans on this planet .
You want germs ?
No one knows how many there are .
From various estimates , we could be talking about thousands of trillions to the thousandth power .
Maybe more .
If an infinitesimal fraction of the critters caused serious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all be dead , we ’ d be dead on dead on dead .
To begin to understand how overblown all these modern epidemic duds are , let ’ s go to the animals .
Farm animals .
Pigs .
A headline blares : A MILLION PIGS SLAUGHTERED .
African Swine Fever Virus was discovered , and in order to stop the contagion , death was rained down on the pigs .
On the farm .
On the giant factory farm .
So a question arises : Do you seriously think humans sat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pigs and tested him/her for the Virus ?
Drew a blood or tissue sample ?
Twenty pigs tested positive and they killed the rest as matter of course .
They always do .
But wait .
What are the conditions on this massive million-pig factory farm ?
Let ’ s see .
Pigs living in their own urine and feces , crowded next to one another , nose to butt , sprayed with toxic chemicals , eating chemical-laced feed—under high stress , never living the kind of existence they were designed for .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ sick ?
Think some kind of minimally reliable test might find a virus or two living and replicating in their bodies ?
Do you seriously think those viruses matter , contrasted against the OBVIOUS immunosuppressive ENVIRONMENT ?
As the number one germ hunter of all time , Louis Pasteur , was reported to have confessed on his deathbed : it ’ s not the germ , it ’ s the terrain—meaning , it ’ s the body and its strength and vitality and resiliency—THAT should be the real focus of the healing profession @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There ’ s no money in it .
A final note for now : When I ’ m told that published studies reveal the coronavirus is actually an engineered bioweapon , from a lab , I repeat the assertion I ’ ve been making in this ongoing series of articles : The researchers are using indirect methods of virus detection ( PCR , antibody tests ) , and as a result , they have no idea what they ’ re discovering .
It could be fragments of random DNA or RNA , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comfortably in the body and never cause harm—and THEN , when the researchers assemble the genetic sequences of these unknown tiny objects and publish them ; SO WHAT ?
And when other people come along and read these sequences and claim there are peculiarities which suggest bio-engineering has taken place , the whole mess of gibberish escalates to a higher level of absurdity .
Yes , it has always been the case that biowar scientists in labs are maniacs fiddling and diddling with mixtures of chemicals and germs ; and yes , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say that NOW , these loons have precisely located the new coronavirus and are precisely altering it to produce an unstoppable force—that ’ s really quite a fantastical leap , and it ’ s a leap that leads into believing , all over again , that “ one germ , one disease ” is the pattern of the human body .
The body deserves more credit than that .

by Jon Rappoport
I write this piece for those who ordinarily have their heads on straight, when it comes to understanding the basics of HEALTH—but now, because of the “coronavirus epidemic,” are drifting back into the medical model: FIXATION ON GERMS.
A correct reading of suppressed medical history reveals that the hypothesis of “one disease, one germ” is a modern con, moving down a blind alley at midnight. And when you add “one vaccine” to the formula, you get an even greater degree of lunacy.
But you also get a trillion-dollar commercial success.
I don’t care how many contemporary molecular biologists are working in labs, amplifying invisible slivers of who knows what molecules into view, and calling them viruses; it’s a con. This also applies to biowar biologists trying to create super-germs. They’re all working in the dark vis-à-vis the natural processes of the body, which are far more complex and far more protective of health than these scientists know—unless the body is interfered with by direct poisons or gross mechanical destruction.
The history of human health shows that upgrades in public sanitation, hygiene, and improved nutrition have done more for people than all the “germ-fighting” pharmaceutical interventions ever invented laid end to end.
But THAT is not a trillion-dollar commercial success.
Even when tissue samples are taken from the body, properly separated through centrifuge, and then observed under an electron microscope, by the most competent and honest researchers, you still get dead pictures of dead particles. As researcher Karma Singh has pointed out, you don’t know, from those pictures, what such particles do or don’t do when they’re alive and integrated in the body. You can’t infer that they cause disease. The whole operation of the Virus Hunters is one brassy late-night infomercial tap dancing in the long, long history of humans on this planet.
You want germs? No one knows how many there are. From various estimates, we could be talking about thousands of trillions to the thousandth power. Maybe more. If an infinitesimal fraction of the critters caused serious disease, we’d not only all be dead, we’d be dead on dead on dead.
To begin to understand how overblown all these modern epidemic duds are, let’s go to the animals. Farm animals. Pigs. A headline blares: A MILLION PIGS SLAUGHTERED. African Swine Fever Virus was discovered, and in order to stop the contagion, death was rained down on the pigs. On the farm. On the giant factory farm. So a question arises:
Do you seriously think humans sat down next to each of the million pigs and tested him/her for the Virus? Drew a blood or tissue sample?
Twenty pigs tested positive and they killed the rest as matter of course. They always do.
But wait. What are the conditions on this massive million-pig factory farm? Let’s see. Pigs living in their own urine and feces, crowded next to one another, nose to butt, sprayed with toxic chemicals, eating chemical-laced feed—under high stress, never living the kind of existence they were designed for. Think they’re going to get sick? Think some kind of minimally reliable test might find a virus or two living and replicating in their bodies? Do you seriously think those viruses matter, contrasted against the OBVIOUS immunosuppressive ENVIRONMENT?
As the number one germ hunter of all time, Louis Pasteur, was reported to have confessed on his deathbed: it’s not the germ, it’s the terrain—meaning, it’s the body and its strength and vitality and resiliency—THAT should be the real focus of the healing profession. Building up health.
One problem. There’s no money in it.
Oops.
A final note for now: When I’m told that published studies reveal the coronavirus is actually an engineered bioweapon, from a lab, I repeat the assertion I’ve been making in this ongoing series of articles:
The researchers are using indirect methods of virus detection (PCR, antibody tests), and as a result, they have no idea what they’re discovering. It could be fragments of random DNA or RNA, cellular debris, germs that live quite comfortably in the body and never cause harm—and THEN, when the researchers assemble the genetic sequences of these unknown tiny objects and publish them; SO WHAT? And when other people come along and read these sequences and claim there are peculiarities which suggest bio-engineering has taken place, the whole mess of gibberish escalates to a higher level of absurdity. Yes, it has always been the case that biowar scientists in labs are maniacs fiddling and diddling with mixtures of chemicals and germs; and yes, they should all be stopped; but to say that NOW, these loons have precisely located the new coronavirus and are precisely altering it to produce an unstoppable force—that’s really quite a fantastical leap, and it’s a leap that leads into believing, all over again, that “one germ, one disease” is the pattern of the human body. The body deserves more credit than that.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-04--Fear Is The Oxygen of Government Power

Fear Is The Oxygen of Government Power

Fear is the oxygen of government power .
In order for power to increase its scope , the citizens must let their guard down .
When they are afraid , the guard comes down .
Those who are afraid are easy prey for those who want to expand power .
The most popular fear adopted by governments , since perhaps the very first government to exist , is one that generates war .
The fear that someone else is going to come and get you .
Americans are very familiar with this one , as entire lifetimes have been spent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and then another .
So war is the most popular fear generator for governments .
It ’ s also the biggest moneymaker for government-connected corporations .
However , since the adoption of nuclear weapons , war can not be total anymore .
Everyone knows this .
Everyone knows that the world can be destroyed many times over if passions get out of hand .
That doesn ’ t mean it can ’ t happen .
It most certainly can , but manipulators of power are not interested in a destroyed world .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , meant to have their fingerprints on everything that transpires .
They want to rule a world that exists .
Total war is not very attractive if that is the goal .
So , those with nuclear weapons stay out of each others way , and regional wars are kept aflame .
Unbelievable amounts of money go to the military-industrial-complex like clockwork .
Americans don ’ t pay attention or care .
The wealth transfer couldn ’ t be more easily accomplished .
But what about ruling the world and every living human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can ’ t do the trick , what can ?
Well , shortly after the proliferation of nuclear weapons , new technologies emerged and surveillance became another tool in government ’ s arsenal .
For sure , it didn ’ t take long for power-hungry individuals to start fantasizing about surveilling everyone and everything in the world .
That ’ s a totalitarian dream !
Along with the advancement of surveillance technologies came a fresh new fear as well .
This was one , that if successful , could be imposed on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the name of Environmentalism , but this wouldn ’ t be about curbing pollution , which does not require totalitarian government power .
No , this fear would be that the world would turn into an ice cube if extraordinary power was not granted to government .
Then it morphed into the world turning into a fireball if power wasn ’ t granted .
Then , probably out of desperation , the fear became that the climate would “ change.
” The fear was ramped up to politicians actually claiming that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
But then came a fear that stuck , and it stuck globally .
Sadly , the people would bite .
With lightning speed , in the name of stopping a virus that has turned out to be no more deadly than the seasonal flu , governments everywhere got away with shutting and ruining their economies .
They also placed their people virtually under house arrest .
This is a bad situation for people ( all over the world ) to be in .
The idea of government being a servant and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down .
There is only one way out of every government-generated fear — Liberty .
It doesn ’ t matter what the fear happens to be , Liberty is the answer .
It doesn ’ t matter how draconian governments become , Liberty is the answer .
Man is free by nature , and nature can not be changed .
So the totalitarian dream is a loser from the start .
But totalitarians can do tons of damage in the meantime .
They may never reach their goal , but they sure will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It is a present and eternal reality .
Individuals just have to embrace it , and be not afraid .

By Chris Rossini
Fear is the oxygen of government power. In order for power to increase its scope, the citizens must let their guard down. When they are afraid, the guard comes down. Those who are afraid are easy prey for those who want to expand power.
The most popular fear adopted by governments, since perhaps the very first government to exist, is one that generates war. The fear that someone else is going to come and get you. Americans are very familiar with this one, as entire lifetimes have been spent being afraid one boogeyman followed by another, and then another.
So war is the most popular fear generator for governments. It’s also the biggest moneymaker for government-connected corporations.
However, since the adoption of nuclear weapons, war cannot be total anymore. Everyone knows this. Everyone knows that the world can be destroyed many times over if passions get out of hand.
That doesn’t mean it can’t happen. It most certainly can, but manipulators of power are not interested in a destroyed world. They believe themselves to be superior beings, meant to have their fingerprints on everything that transpires. They want to rule a world that exists. Total war is not very attractive if that is the goal.
So, those with nuclear weapons stay out of each others way, and regional wars are kept aflame. Unbelievable amounts of money go to the military-industrial-complex like clockwork. Americans don’t pay attention or care. The wealth transfer couldn’t be more easily accomplished.
But what about ruling the world and every living human being on it? If total war can’t do the trick, what can?
Well, shortly after the proliferation of nuclear weapons, new technologies emerged and surveillance became another tool in government’s arsenal. For sure, it didn’t take long for power-hungry individuals to start fantasizing about surveilling everyone and everything in the world. That’s a totalitarian dream!
Along with the advancement of surveillance technologies came a fresh new fear as well. This was one, that if successful, could be imposed on the whole world. The fear would go by the name of Environmentalism, but this wouldn’t be about curbing pollution, which does not require totalitarian government power.
No, this fear would be that the world would turn into an ice cube if extraordinary power was not granted to government. Then it morphed into the world turning into a fireball if power wasn’t granted. Then, probably out of desperation, the fear became that the climate would “change.”
But the people wouldn’t bite.
The fear was ramped up to politicians actually claiming that the world would end in 12 years!!
The people still wouldn’t bite.
But then came a fear that stuck, and it stuck globally. Sadly, the people would bite.
With lightning speed, in the name of stopping a virus that has turned out to be no more deadly than the seasonal flu, governments everywhere got away with shutting and ruining their economies. They also placed their people virtually under house arrest.
This is a bad situation for people (all over the world) to be in. The idea of government being a servant and the people the master has been flipped upside down.
There is only one way out of every government-generated fear — Liberty.
It doesn’t matter what the fear happens to be, Liberty is the answer. It doesn’t matter how draconian governments become, Liberty is the answer.
Man is free by nature, and nature cannot be changed. So the totalitarian dream is a loser from the start.
But totalitarians can do tons of damage in the meantime. They may never reach their goal, but they sure will trample everything in their way by trying.
The future isn’t written yet.
Liberty is at hand.
It is a present and eternal reality.
Individuals just have to embrace it, and be not afraid.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-04--Next in Coronavirus Tyranny: Forced Vaccinations and ‘Digital Certificates’

In my first week in the House of Representatives in 1976 , I cast one of the two votes against legislation appropriating funds for a swine flu vaccination program .
A swine flu outbreak was then dominating headlines , so most in DC were frantic to “ do something ” about the virus .
Unfortunately , the hastily developed and rushed-into-production swine flu vaccine was not only ineffective , it was dangerous .
Approximately 50 people who received the vaccine subsequently contracted Guillain-Barré syndrome , a potentially fatal form of paralysis .
According to an expert with the Centers for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was four times higher among those who received the swine flu vaccine than in the general population .
That sad history may soon repeat itself .
Right now , governments and private industries are working to rapidly develop and deploy a coronavirus vaccine .
Microsoft founder Bill Gates , who is a major funder of these efforts , has suggested everyone who receives a vaccine be issued a “ digital certificate ” proving he has been vaccinated .
Dr. Anthony Fauci , whose record of wrong predictions makes him the Bill Kristol of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some proof they have been vaccinated .
Another authoritarian proposal floated to deal with coronavirus is to force everyone to download a phone app that will track their movements .
This would allow government officials to identify those who may have been near anyone who may have had coronavirus .
Such mandatory “ contact tracing ” is an assault on our privacy and liberty .
Vaccines can improve health .
For example , vaccines helped reduce the incidence of diseases like polio .
But not all vaccines are safe and effective for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , such as giving infants multiple vaccines at one time , may cause health problems .
The fact that vaccines may benefit some people , or even most people , does not justify government forcing individuals to be vaccinated .
It also does not justify vaccinating children against their parents ’ wishes .
And it certainly does not justify keeping individuals and families in involuntary quarantine because they do not have “ digital certificates ” proving they have had their shots .
If government can force individuals to receive medical treatment against their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why government can not force individuals to buy medical insurance , prohibit them from owning firearms , dictate their terms of employment , and prevent them from taking arguably harmful actions like smoking marijuana or drinking raw milk .
Similarly , if government can override parents ’ wishes regarding medical treatment for their children , then there is no reason why government can not usurp parental authority in other areas , such as education .
Proponents of mandatory vaccines and enhanced surveillance are trying to blackmail the American people by arguing that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a healthcare surveillance state and make vaccination mandatory .
The growing number of Americans who are tired of not being able to go to work , school , or church , or even to take their children to a park because of government mandates should reject this “ deal.
” Instead , they should demand an immediate end to the lockdowns and the restoration of individual responsibility for deciding how best to protect their health .

By Ron Paul
In my first week in the House of Representatives in 1976, I cast one of the two votes against legislation appropriating funds for a swine flu vaccination program. A swine flu outbreak was then dominating headlines, so most in DC were frantic to “do something” about the virus.
Unfortunately, the hastily developed and rushed-into-production swine flu vaccine was not only ineffective, it was dangerous. Approximately 50 people who received the vaccine subsequently contracted Guillain-Barré syndrome, a potentially fatal form of paralysis. According to an expert with the Centers for Disease Control, the incidence of Guillain-Barré was four times higher among those who received the swine flu vaccine than in the general population.
That sad history may soon repeat itself. Right now, governments and private industries are working to rapidly develop and deploy a coronavirus vaccine. Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who is a major funder of these efforts, has suggested everyone who receives a vaccine be issued a “digital certificate” proving he has been vaccinated. Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose record of wrong predictions makes him the Bill Kristol of epidemiology, also wants individuals to carry some proof they have been vaccinated.
Another authoritarian proposal floated to deal with coronavirus is to force everyone to download a phone app that will track their movements. This would allow government officials to identify those who may have been near anyone who may have had coronavirus. Such mandatory “contact tracing” is an assault on our privacy and liberty.
Vaccines can improve health. For example, vaccines helped reduce the incidence of diseases like polio. But not all vaccines are safe and effective for all people. Furthermore, certain modern practices, such as giving infants multiple vaccines at one time, may cause health problems. The fact that vaccines may benefit some people, or even most people, does not justify government forcing individuals to be vaccinated. It also does not justify vaccinating children against their parents’ wishes. And it certainly does not justify keeping individuals and families in involuntary quarantine because they do not have “digital certificates” proving they have had their shots.
If government can force individuals to receive medical treatment against their will, then there is no reason why government cannot force individuals to buy medical insurance, prohibit them from owning firearms, dictate their terms of employment, and prevent them from taking arguably harmful actions like smoking marijuana or drinking raw milk. Similarly, if government can override parents’ wishes regarding medical treatment for their children, then there is no reason why government cannot usurp parental authority in other areas, such as education.
Proponents of mandatory vaccines and enhanced surveillance are trying to blackmail the American people by arguing that the lockdown cannot end unless we create a healthcare surveillance state and make vaccination mandatory. The growing number of Americans who are tired of not being able to go to work, school, or church, or even to take their children to a park because of government mandates should reject this “deal.” Instead, they should demand an immediate end to the lockdowns and the restoration of individual responsibility for deciding how best to protect their health.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-04--Now Is The Time To Speak The Ideas of Liberty With Conviction

What if you took a stand and threw all your weight behind the fact that 2+2=4 ?
What if , while taking that stand people accused you of being an oddball ?
What if they called you a “ mathematical extremist ?
” What if they said “ Yeah , most of the time 2+2 does equal 4 , but there are certain extreme situations where that idea has to be abandoned , and you must believe that 2+2=5.
” Would you stick ?
Or would back down and drown yourself into the herd ?
Most people when reading the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stick .
Of course 2+2=4 , and there are no “ extreme circumstances ” that can change that .
But the pressures of the herd are not on them , so its easy to affirm that they would stick .
Now let ’ s move from a mathematical absolute to an absolute about man ’ s nature : Every person is naturally endowed with individual liberty .
Every person is the final arbiter on what he or she believes , and how to act to make him or herself happy .
This individual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are very important and concrete “ built-in ” restraints , so to speak .
Since everyone is free , each is limited by the freedom of everyone else .
In other words , your liberty is limited by my liberty .
That is , you can do whatever you want with your life and your property as long as it does not harm or injure my life and my property .
At the same time , I can do whatever I want with my life and my property as long as it doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If someone chooses not to abide by this “ built-in ” restraint , they are choosing to act as a tyrant , and against man ’ s nature .
For thousands of years , all the major religions and civilizations have acknowledged these principles : Don ’ t kill , don ’ t steal , don ’ t cheat…For these are the destroyers of life .
Again , if I were to present these ideas to most people , they would agree with every word of it .
In fact , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ principles , whether they consciously think about it or not .
But the tune changes when a person is confronted by the herd .
What if , while taking the stand for individual liberty people accused you of being an oddball ?
What if they called you an “ liberty extremist ?
” What if they say : “ Yeah , most of the time individual liberty is great , but there are certain circumstance where it must be disregarded and abandoned.
” But once the principle is compromised , that it ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violate a person ’ s individual liberty , the floodgates open and a deluge of excuses pour out to steal , kill and violate liberty .
Civilization then decays and declines ; gradually at first , and then very rapidly .
It would be no different then if 2+2=5 was believed to be true en masse .
Everything would start to fall apart…Everything .
The Sunshine Patriot , mentioned by the eloquent Thomas Paine , waits for it to safe to proclaim the ideas of Liberty .
He puts his finger in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t throw his weight behind the truth until he ’ s sure others will approve .
There is no need to wait around for the Sunshine Patriots .
They ’ ll eventually show up .
They always do .
Now is the time to defend the ideas of Liberty ; when the insults are flying , when the name-calling is abundant , and when the herd is racing everyone towards the cliff .
Liberty is the truth , in the same way that 2+2=4 is the truth .
America , of all places @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not afraid to speak it and proclaim it with conviction .

By Chris Rossini
What if you took a stand and threw all your weight behind the fact that 2+2=4?
What if, while taking that stand people accused you of being an oddball? What if they called you a “mathematical extremist?” What if they said “Yeah, most of the time 2+2 does equal 4, but there are certain extreme situations where that idea has to be abandoned, and you must believe that 2+2=5.”
Would you stick? Or would back down and drown yourself into the herd?
Most people when reading the above would confidently say that they would stick. Of course 2+2=4, and there are no “extreme circumstances” that can change that.
But the pressures of the herd are not on them, so its easy to affirm that they would stick.
Now let’s move from a mathematical absolute to an absolute about man’s nature: Every person is naturally endowed with individual liberty. Every person is the final arbiter on what he or she believes, and how to act to make him or herself happy.
This individual liberty is not without restraint. There are very important and concrete “built-in” restraints, so to speak.
Since everyone is free, each is limited by the freedom of everyone else.
In other words, your liberty is limited by my liberty. That is, you can do whatever you want with your life and your property as long as it does not harm or injure my life and my property.
At the same time, I can do whatever I want with my life and my property as long as it doesn’t harm your life or property.
If someone chooses not to abide by this “built-in” restraint, they are choosing to act as a tyrant, and against man’s nature.
For thousands of years, all the major religions and civilizations have acknowledged these principles: Don’t kill, don’t steal, don’t cheat…For these are the destroyers of life.
Again, if I were to present these ideas to most people, they would agree with every word of it. In fact, a vast majority of people live by these principles, whether they consciously think about it or not.
But the tune changes when a person is confronted by the herd. What if, while taking the stand for individual liberty people accused you of being an oddball? What if they called you an “liberty extremist?”
What if they say: “Yeah, most of the time individual liberty is great, but there are certain circumstance where it must be disregarded and abandoned.”
But once the principle is compromised, that it’s OK to steal, kill and violate a person’s individual liberty, the floodgates open and a deluge of excuses pour out to steal, kill and violate liberty.
Civilization then decays and declines; gradually at first, and then very rapidly.
It would be no different then if 2+2=5 was believed to be true en masse. Everything would start to fall apart…Everything.
The Sunshine Patriot, mentioned by the eloquent Thomas Paine, waits for it to safe to proclaim the ideas of Liberty. He puts his finger in the wind and waits. He can’t throw his weight behind the truth until he’s sure others will approve.
There is no need to wait around for the Sunshine Patriots. They’ll eventually show up. They always do.
Now is the time to defend the ideas of Liberty; when the insults are flying, when the name-calling is abundant, and when the herd is racing everyone towards the cliff.
Liberty is the truth, in the same way that 2+2=4 is the truth.
America, of all places, should have plenty of patriots that are not afraid to speak it and proclaim it with conviction.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-04--Like Freedom? Then You Won’t Like the FREEDOM Act

Last Monday , a bipartisan group of Senators and a coalition including libertarian and progressive activists thwarted a scheme to ram through the Senate legislation renewing three provisions of the USA FREEDOM Act ( previously known as the USA PATRIOT Act ) .
The bill had already been rushed through the House of Representatives , and most expected it to sail through the Senate .
But , instead , Senate leadership had to settle for a 77-day extension .
Senate leadership was also forced to allow consideration of several amendments at a later date .
Included is Sen. Rand Paul @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FISA court from issuing warrants targeting American citizens .
Deep state supporters claim the expiring business records provision ( which authorizes the collection of our communications and was at the center of Edward Snowden ’ s 2013 revelations ) , lone wolf provision ( which allows government to subject an individual with no known ties to terrorists to warrantless surveillance ) , and roving wiretaps provision ( which allows government to monitor communications on any device that may be used by a targeted individual ) are necessary to keep Americans safe .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Act almost 20 years ago , mass surveillance , warrantless wiretapping , and bulk data collection have not stopped a single terrorist attack .
The legislation does have “ reforms ” aimed at protecting civil liberties , but these new protections contain loopholes that render the protections meaningless .
For example , the bill requires those targeted for surveillance to be notified that the government spied on them .
However , this requirement can be waived if the government simply claims — not proves but just clams — that notifying the target would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provision also only applies to the target of an investigations .
So , if you were caught up in a federal investigation because a coworker is being targeted and you shared an office computer , or if a store clerk reported to the government you and others bought pressure cookers , the government could collect your phone records , texts , and social media posts without giving you the chance to challenge the government ’ s actions .
The bill also makes some reforms to the special FISA court , which serves as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These reforms are mainly aimed at protecting political campaigns and candidates .
They would not stop the FISA court from rubber-stamping surveillance on organizations that oppose the welfare-warfare-surveillance-fiat money status quo .
Anything limiting warrantless wiretapping and mass surveillance should be supported .
However , nothing short of repeal of the USA FREEDOM Act will restore respect for our right to live our lives free of the fear that Big Brother is watching .
The path to liberty , peace , and prosperity starts with eliminating all unconstitutional laws and returning to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ markets , individual liberty , sound money , and a foreign policy that seeks peaceful commerce and friendship with all instead of seeking new monsters to destroy .

By Ron Paul
Last Monday, a bipartisan group of Senators and a coalition including libertarian and progressive activists thwarted a scheme to ram through the Senate legislation renewing three provisions of the USA FREEDOM Act (previously known as the USA PATRIOT Act). The bill had already been rushed through the House of Representatives, and most expected it to sail through the Senate. But, instead, Senate leadership had to settle for a 77-day extension.
Senate leadership was also forced to allow consideration of several amendments at a later date. Included is Sen. Rand Paul’s amendment that would forbid the FISA court from issuing warrants targeting American citizens.
Deep state supporters claim the expiring business records provision (which authorizes the collection of our communications and was at the center of Edward Snowden’s 2013 revelations), lone wolf provision (which allows government to subject an individual with no known ties to terrorists to warrantless surveillance), and roving wiretaps provision (which allows government to monitor communications on any device that may be used by a targeted individual) are necessary to keep Americans safe. But, since Congress first passed the PATRIOT Act almost 20 years ago, mass surveillance, warrantless wiretapping, and bulk data collection have not stopped a single terrorist attack.
The legislation does have “reforms” aimed at protecting civil liberties, but these new protections contain loopholes that render the protections meaningless. For example, the bill requires those targeted for surveillance to be notified that the government spied on them. However, this requirement can be waived if the government simply claims — not proves but just clams — that notifying the target would harm “national security.”
The notice provision also only applies to the target of an investigations. So, if you were caught up in a federal investigation because a coworker is being targeted and you shared an office computer, or if a store clerk reported to the government you and others bought pressure cookers, the government could collect your phone records, texts, and social media posts without giving you the chance to challenge the government’s actions.
The bill also makes some reforms to the special FISA court, which serves as a rubber stamp for the intelligence community. These reforms are mainly aimed at protecting political campaigns and candidates. They would not stop the FISA court from rubber-stamping surveillance on organizations that oppose the welfare-warfare-surveillance-fiat money status quo.
Anything limiting warrantless wiretapping and mass surveillance should be supported. However, nothing short of repeal of the USA FREEDOM Act will restore respect for our right to live our lives free of the fear that Big Brother is watching. The path to liberty, peace, and prosperity starts with eliminating all unconstitutional laws and returning to a system of limited government, free markets, individual liberty, sound money, and a foreign policy that seeks peaceful commerce and friendship with all instead of seeking new monsters to destroy.