australiannationalreview--2020-11-02--Trump is ‘Holding the fort against a merciless campaign to wipe out history’

Trump is ‘ Holding the fort against a merciless campaign to wipe out history ’ .
Alan Jones says Trump @ @ @ @ @ a merciless campaign to “ wipe out our history … and indoctrinate out children ” @ @ @ @ @ the world at Mount Rushmore on July 4 when he spoke of , there as @ @ @ @ @ campaign to wipe out our history , defame our heroes , erase our values and @ @ @ @ @ “ And that is why this election is not just about America.
” Mr. Jones @ @ @ @ @ , “ there is new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance… if you do not @ @ @ @ @ be censured and punished ” .
“ That is not going to happen to us @ @ @ @ @ .
“ We will not be tyrannised .
We will never surrender the spirit of @ @ @ @ @ ”

Trump is ‘Holding the fort against a merciless campaign to wipe out history’.
By Sky News Australia
Alan Jones says Trump is holding the fort against a merciless campaign to “wipe out our history … and indoctrinate out children”.
“Trump spoke for the world at Mount Rushmore on July 4 when he spoke of, there as here, ‘a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values and indoctrinate our children’.
“And that is why this election is not just about America.”
Mr. Jones said the President rightly argued, “there is new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance… if you do not follow its demands… you will be censured and punished”.
“That is not going to happen to us,” President Trump said.
“We will not be tyrannised. We will never surrender the spirit of July 4, 1776.”


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--Chinese Group Behind Release of Biden Tapes Claim Bidens Offered Up CIA Agents Who Went Missing in C

Chinese Group Behind Release of Biden Tapes Claim Bidens Offered Up CIA Agents Who Went Missing in China in 2010 -2012 .
It really can ’ t get much worse .
Now the individuals who are releasing the Biden tapes and documents claim the Bidens were responsible for offering up CIA agents in China .
As we ’ ve previously reported , the Chinese government murdered or imprisoned 18-20 CIA sources from 2010 to 2012 .
China killed or imprisoned 18 to 20 CIA sources from 2010 to 2012 , hobbling U.S. spying operations in a massive intelligence breach whose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York Times reported on Saturday .
TRENDING : Don Jr .
Rallies in Yuma City – Ivanka Rallies in Michigan – Eric Trump Rallies in Florida… So , Where ’ s Hunter ?
Investigators remain divided over whether there was a spy within the Central Intelligence Agency who betrayed the sources or whether the Chinese hacked the CIA ’ s covert communications system , the newspaper reported , citing current and former U.S. officials .
The Chinese killed at least a dozen people providing information to the CIA from 2010 through 2012 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the making , the newspaper reported .
The breach was considered particularly damaging , with the number of assets lost rivaling those in the Soviet Union and Russia who perished after information passed to Moscow by spies Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen , the report said .
Ames was active as a spy in the 1980s and Hanssen from 1979 to 2001 .
The CIA declined to comment when asked about the Times report on Saturday .
Tonight , the group of individuals in Asia who released a number of Hunter Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claim .
At the end of one of their videos , those who released the videos shared the following : First they claim China takes advantage of Westerners by framing them and taking advantage of them : The Bidens were targeted by the CCP : The CCP bribed the Bidens to get what they wanted including the South China Sea which occurred while Obama and Biden were in office : According to the report , the Bidens provided the identities of large numbers of CIA agents to the CCP as part of their @ @

Chinese Group Behind Release of Biden Tapes Claim Bidens Offered Up CIA Agents Who Went Missing in China in 2010 -2012.
By Joe Hoft
It really can’t get much worse. Now the individuals who are releasing the Biden tapes and documents claim the Bidens were responsible for offering up CIA agents in China.
As we’ve previously reported, the Chinese government murdered or imprisoned 18-20 CIA sources from 2010 to 2012.
From the Business Insider:
China killed or imprisoned 18 to 20 CIA sources from 2010 to 2012, hobbling U.S. spying operations in a massive intelligence breach whose origin has not been identified, the New York Times reported on Saturday. TRENDING: Don Jr. Rallies in Yuma City – Ivanka Rallies in Michigan – Eric Trump Rallies in Florida… So, Where’s Hunter? Investigators remain divided over whether there was a spy within the Central Intelligence Agency who betrayed the sources or whether the Chinese hacked the CIA’s covert communications system, the newspaper reported, citing current and former U.S. officials. The Chinese killed at least a dozen people providing information to the CIA from 2010 through 2012, dismantling a network that was years in the making, the newspaper reported. The breach was considered particularly damaging, with the number of assets lost rivaling those in the Soviet Union and Russia who perished after information passed to Moscow by spies Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen, the report said. Ames was active as a spy in the 1980s and Hanssen from 1979 to 2001. The CIA declined to comment when asked about the Times report on Saturday.
Tonight, the group of individuals in Asia who released a number of Hunter Biden videos and pictures made a very significant claim. At the end of one of their videos, those who released the videos shared the following:
First they claim China takes advantage of Westerners by framing them and taking advantage of them:
The Bidens were targeted by the CCP:
The CCP bribed the Bidens to get what they wanted including the South China Sea which occurred while Obama and Biden were in office:
According to the report, the Bidens provided the identities of large numbers of CIA agents to the CCP as part of their relationship.


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--Is this leaked info really Trudeau’s crazy COVID plan for 2021?

Is this leaked info really Trudeau ’ s crazy COVID plan for 2021 ?
I want to provide you some very important information .
I ’ m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada .
I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee ( which is steered by the PMO ) .
I need to start off by saying that I ’ m not happy doing this but I have to .
As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children as well .
The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30 % of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada , but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals .
They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes .
The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows : – Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis , starting with major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Expected by November 2020 .
– Rush the acquisition of ( or construction of ) isolation facilities across every province and territory .
Expected by December 2020 .
– Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing , including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves .
Expected by end of November 2020 .
– Complete and total secondary lock down ( much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions ) .
Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021 – Reform and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transitioned into the universal basic income program .
Expected by Q1 2021 .
– Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus ( referred to as COVID-21 ) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection .
Expected by February 2021 .
– Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity .
Expected Q1 – Q2 2021 .
– Enhanced lock down restrictions ( referred to as Third Lock Down ) will be implemented .
Full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inter-province and inter-city ) .
Expected Q2 2021 .
– Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program .
Expected mid Q2 2021 .
– Projected supply chain break downs , inventory shortages , large economic instability .
Expected late Q2 2021 .
– Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints .
Restrict travel and movement .
Provide logistical support to the area .
Expected by Q3 2021 .
Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor .
One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians .
What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale , that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief .
This is how it works : the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts ( mortgages , loans , credit cards , etc ) which all funding will be provided to Canada @ @ @ @ @ @ @ known as the World Debt Reset program .
In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever .
The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule , which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down ( through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada ’ s HealthPass ) .
Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would happen to lenders or financial institutions , we were simply told “ the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details ” .
Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program , or the HealthPass , or the vaccination schedule , and the answer we got was very troubling .
Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen .
We were told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to participate .
When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely .
And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program , the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities .
Once in those facilities they would be given two options , participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released , or stay indefinitely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized .
So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I ’ ve ever witnessed before .
In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not .
That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas .
That we need to take advantage of the situations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grander scale for the betterment of everyone .
The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored .
Our opinions and concerns were ignored .
We were simply told to just do it .
All I know is that I don ’ t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future .

Is this leaked info really Trudeau’s crazy COVID plan for 2021?
By Canadian Report
Fw: LPC Strategic Committee LeakInboxLPC leaker 1:47 PM (7 hours ago)
Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 1:38 PM, REMOVED wrote:
Dear REMOVED,
I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO).
I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.
The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:
– Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020.
– Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020.
– Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by end of November 2020.
– Complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021
– Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021.
– Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021.
– Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021.
– Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021.
– Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021.
– Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021.
– Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021.
Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided
to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass) .
Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized.
So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.
All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--FAUCI CONFIRMS! COVID-19 MASKS CAUSE MAJORITY OF FATALITIES VIA BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA

FAUCI CONFIRMS !
COVID-19 MASKS CAUSE MAJORITY OF FATALITIES VIA BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA .
The Bacterial Pneumonia was the leading cause @ @ @ @ @ Flu , and Fauci is hiding the mask ’ s ability to cause pneumonia even @ @ @ @ @ the exact same thing .
You wonder why then he told us not to wear @ @ @ @ @ Our 2020 Election Super Sale is now live !
Get free shipping and up to @ @ @ @ @ products today !

URGENT: JUST 7 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--Google sued, The Great Reset, Biden sold out CIA assets, Terrorist Attacks in France, AG Barr, C.Wra

Google sued , The Great Reset , Biden sold out CIA assets , Terrorist Attacks in France , AG Barr @ @ @ @ @ ’ s power deals .
Get ready for an explosive broadcast .
Prominent Youtubers are @ @ @ @ @ of Alternative media channels .
I ’ m going to cover the Great Reset plan @ @ @ @ @ Vigano .
More crimes committed by the Biden ’ s being exposed , this time @ @ @ @ @ .
The Deep State Democrat ’ s are at it again with their false flag @ @ @ @ @ in Nice , France .
AG Barr , Christoper Wray and Hunter Biden were all @ @ @ @ @ the Chinsse and Russians .
Just when the world can ’ t get anymore crazier @ @ @ @ @ find out AG Barr is a deep state demon rat .
That ’ s why @ @ @ @ @ after a 1000 page report full of evidences was submitted and it ’ s been @ @ @ @ @ year .

Google sued, The Great Reset, Biden sold out CIA assets, Terrorist Attacks in France, AG Barr, C.Wray & Hunter Biden’s power deals.
By 3D to 5D Consciousness
Get ready for an explosive broadcast. Prominent Youtubers are suing Google for massive purging of Alternative media channels. I’m going to cover the Great Reset plan exposed by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano. More crimes committed by the Biden’s being exposed, this time he sold out CIA assets. The Deep State Democrat’s are at it again with their false flag terror attacks, this time in Nice, France. AG Barr, Christoper Wray and Hunter Biden were all involved in power deals involving the Chinsse and Russians. Just when the world can’t get anymore crazier, we now come to find out AG Barr is a deep state demon rat. That’s why he’s done nothing after a 1000 page report full of evidences was submitted and it’s been collecting dust for over a year.


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--‘Democracy and human rights are dead in Victoria’: Alan Jones

‘ Democracy and human rights are dead in Victoria ’ : Alan Jones .
Sky News host Alan Jones says democracy and human rights are dead in Victoria and there are not many left who will defend them .
The Supreme Court has ruled Melbourne ’ s controversial coronavirus curfew – which stopped residents from leaving their homes during the height of Victoria ’ s deadly second wave – was legal .
The legal challenge was spearheaded by a café owner on the Mornington Peninsula who argued the curfew was a violation of human rights .
However , Supreme Court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was unprecedented and a strain on human rights , it was warranted and proportionate to the emergency health situation at the time .
“ Now , this disgraceful Andrews government is going to pursue this café owner for costs , ” Mr Jones said .
“ I am telling you ; democracy and human rights are dead in Victoria .
“ And there are not many of us left to defend them.
” Mr Jones spoke with Monica Smit and Morgan Jonas from ‘ Reignite Democracy Australia ’ , and what took place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sale of Victoria ’ , at Treasury Gardens .

‘Democracy and human rights are dead in Victoria’: Alan Jones.
By Sky News Australia
Sky News host Alan Jones says democracy and human rights are dead in Victoria and there are not many left who will defend them.
The Supreme Court has ruled Melbourne’s controversial coronavirus curfew – which stopped residents from leaving their homes during the height of Victoria’s deadly second wave – was legal.
The legal challenge was spearheaded by a café owner on the Mornington Peninsula who argued the curfew was a violation of human rights.
However, Supreme Court Judge Tim Ginnane ruled while the curfew was unprecedented and a strain on human rights, it was warranted and proportionate to the emergency health situation at the time.
“Now, this disgraceful Andrews government is going to pursue this café owner for costs,” Mr Jones said.
“Send another innocent Victorian broke.
“I am telling you; democracy and human rights are dead in Victoria.
“And there are not many of us left to defend them.”
Mr Jones spoke with Monica Smit and Morgan Jonas from ‘Reignite Democracy Australia’, and what took place at a recent rally, ‘Stop the sale of Victoria’, at Treasury Gardens.


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--Complaint by Danielle Burnie to the TGA of Australia re PCR tests

Complaint by Danielle Burnie to the TGA of Australia re PCR tests .
CC : Australian Department of Health ; Office of Health Protection ; The Public Health Laboratory Network ; The Advisory Committee on Medicines ; Australian Medical Association ; Political bodies ; media outlets ; Australia Federal Police ; Victoria Police ; The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet ; Parliament of Australia ; Australian Human Rights Commission ; My Aged Care .
I am writing to make an official complaint about the medical device and subsequent testing process for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ were expediated due to the ‘ pandemic ’ nature of Covid-19 .
This means they have been approved based on very limited clinical and performance data .
It is well and truly overdue that the PCR testing be properly and thoroughly evaluated .
Before this occurs , I urge you to call an immediate cessation to the use of these testing devices in Australia .
These tests are being used by the government to justify measures protecting against a pandemic .
The pandemic was declared by the WHO and it should be noted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a ‘ pandemic ’ 12 years ago , a pandemic was originally defined as a disease that spread worldwide resulting in widespread serious illness and death .
Now it merely requires that a disease spread worldwide .
If we , in Australia accept this definition , it makes it very easy to declare a pandemic when a screening tool like PCR tests are used as diagnostic tools .
The number of deaths and ‘ cases ’ in Australia does not merit the declaration of a pandemic here , especially when these numbers are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is using these tests results not only in Australia but the rest of the world , where PCR is also being used , to justify the following ( not limited to ) : • Passing federal laws to enable foreign troops and foreign police forces to enter Australia in the event of an emergency , immune from prosecution .
( Defence Legislation Amendment ( Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies ) Bill 2020 .
• Violating privacy by the proposed use of telephone GPS for contact tracing .
• 200+ days and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Victoria including : • Limits on numbers of visitors in households • Limits on numbers of contacts outside the home • Mandatory wearing of masks by children in school A vaccination campaign has already begun with policies such as no jab , no pay .
No jab , no travel .
This is a serious and provocative threat by the government and once again justified in their opinion by ‘ case ’ numbers .
The physiological and psychological consequences of these policies will have devastating and uncountable consequences on the lives of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ injuries caused will outnumber by thousands any death or permanent injury caused by Covid-19 .
The weight that is being placed on the statistics is monumental .
And the statistics are all being derived from PCR testing .
You have a responsibility to investigate this medical fraud , I do not use that term lightly .
But there is enough evidence for me to be extremely concerned that this is exactly that , medical fraud .
Please see below the information I have gathered about PCR testing .
1 .
The TGA ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ page says there is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available Covid-19 tests .
AND ‘ Covid-19 is an emerging viral infectious disease .
There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available Covid-19 tests ’ .
2 .
PCR TESTING DOES NOT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COVID-19 AND INFLUENZA The Covid-19 virus has never been isolated .
Each and every positive test is an ‘ assumption ’ that the test is picking up the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
As confirmed by the CDC1 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus ( 2019- nCoV ) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies .
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available , assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA ( N gene ; GenBank accession : MN908947.2 ) of known titer ( RNA copies/µL ) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium ( VTM ) to mimic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guide of one test available in Australia , it clearly states the PCR test does not distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 , influenza , RSV A and B types .
The guide goes on to say that a positive result should be evaluated by a health care professional in the context of medical history , symptoms and other tests2 .
In September 2020 , Roche Pharmaceuticals developed a unique PCR test that distinguishes between the flu and Covid-19 .
This has received emergency authorisation in the US3 .
This clearly shows that before this date @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Covid-19 and the flu .
3 .
THE SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED A FOI request to Public Health England revealed that the virus has not been isolated4 .
The FOI response can be found in the references .
Public Health England also confirmed that detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact nor infectious5 .
Dr Andrew Kaufman criticised a paper published in Nature which claims to prove the pathogenicity of Covid-19 .
Dr Kaufman disproved the study showing that SARS-CoV-2 does not meet Koch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Koch ’ s postulates are the basic principles that must be met before a virus can be proved to cause disease6 .
This is collaborated in another article showing that SARS-CoV-2 fails to meet even one of Koch ’ s postulates let alone them all7 .
This is a vital point that has been deliberately ignored by governments worldwide .
PCR tests are calibrated to match a specific RNA , but we do not know that the RNA is specifically from the SARS-CoV-2 virus because it has never been correctly isolated or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are the PCR tests showing positive ?
In an article titled ‘ PCR Covid-19 Test are Scientifically Meaningless ’ , study authors of all relevant papers ( ‘ proving the existence of SARS-CoV-2 ) were contacted and they all confirmed that the shots depicted in their experiments did not show purified viruses8 .
PCR tests have a false positive rate of around 0.8 % .
Dr Yeadon , former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer states ‘ The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 percent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Dr Malcolm Kendrick10 , the negative percentage agreement ( NPA ) of most commercially available tests is 95.6 % .
If we look at a practical example using the UK figures ( since Australia ’ s ‘ cases ’ are so low ) , it would look like this : From 350,001 tests , 2 , 948 were positive .
Using the NPA we get the following figures : Therefore , the number of true negatives is : Therefore , the number of false positives we would expect from 350,100 tests is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 15,404 This is more than five times the number of positive tests reported , which means we can not have any confidence that any one of those positive tests represents a genuine case .
When you apply this to the Australian cases , the numbers are so drastically low that it is statistically impossible for any of them to be true positives .
The question is ‘ where are all the false positives ’ ?
Contributing to the evidence of false positives , a study called ‘ Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection : the danger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found the following : ‘ The high specificities ( usually 100 % ) reported in PCR-based tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection do not represent the real-world use of these tests , where contamination and human error produce significant rates of false positives .
Widespread lack of awareness of the real-world false positive rates affects an array of clinical , case management and health policy decisions .
Similarly , health authorities ’ guidance on interpreting test results is often wrong .
Steps should be taken immediately to reduce the frequency and impacts of false positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ additional tests at least when prevalence is low11 ’ .
Another study , ‘ An optimisation of four SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR assays in a Kenyan laboratory to support the national COVID-19 rapid response teams ’ , found the following : ‘ We highlight the challenges encountered in the use of the BGI kit that we noted was prone to false positives , but this was mitigated by diluting the reagent volumes and by including an additional confirmatory assay12 .
It should be noted that Victoria is using the BGI kits .
A study on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients found that ‘ In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients , nearly half or even more of the ‘ asymptomatic infected individuals ’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives , ’ the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33 % ’ 13 .
Dr Reiner Fuellmich14 from the German Corona Investigative Committee explains that the developer of the Covid-19 PCR test , Professor Drosten used an old SARS virus to create the PCR test which returned a positive from Covid-19 victims in China .
This very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to declare a pandemic and authorise worldwide use of PCR testing .
They have never validated Drosten ’ s test .
Drosten himself said in 2014 that PCR testing was so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive .
This test can not detect infection .
An infection is when a virus penetrates cells and causes symptoms and only then is a person contagious .
Until then , it is completely harmless .
Alarmingly , in 2007 PCR tests were responsible for the incorrect belief that whooping cough @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hampshire , US .
This mistake had serious ramifications .
Thousands were given antibiotics and vaccines .
8 months later the victims received an email saying the tests were incorrect due to their over sensitivity15 .
There is a very high chance this is happening around the world now , especially in Australia given the extremely low case numbers .
However , the ramifications here , are even more serious than just antibiotics and vaccines ( although this is also incredibly concerning ) .
5 .
All tests have a margin of error @ @ @ @ @ @ @ account by the Victorian Government , or any of the State jurisdictions .
If the margin of error was applied ( 2 – 3 % ) there would be ZERO Covid-19 cases or deaths in Australia .
6 .
The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed that Victoria uses a CT of 35 – 40 .
This is a deliberate and malicious misuse of this screening tool .
According to Professor Raoult from France , any sample amplified above 35 is not viable for analysis .
97 % of positive tests at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much they are no longer viable for testing .
Up to 35CT there are still living virus cells , anything from 35CT , there are only dead virus cells .
Using such a high amplification dilutes the sample to practically water and leaves debris of dead virus cells that are detected16 .
Any positive result in this case does not indicate that a person is sick or infectious and yet these positive results are declared a ‘ case ’ .
The sample should not be amplified over 30CT .
Even with 30CT , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one billion ) , with the temperature changes that occur during the process the sample is very compromised .
Dr Raoult recommends a CT of 25 .
On top of this , the definition of a ‘ case ’ should never be someone who tests positive .
A case must be determined based on other evidence such as the person exhibiting related symptoms and a second confirmed test .
Using a CT value higher than 40 goes against the MIQE guidelines .
‘ A CT value higher than 40 is extremely suspect because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should not be reported ’ ‘ Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real Time PCR Experiments ’ 17 .
A person can shed RNA for 3 months , so the immune system has already killed the virus but tiny debris can be left which is picked up in a PCR test sample amplified above 35 .
This can also account for ‘ mysterious ’ cases where a person tests positive again weeks or months after their initial positive test .
A false positive result that is being treated as a ‘ case ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sorts of treatments and restrictions are imposed on a person .
Any Doctor who makes treatment decisions or support government restrictions based on a positive PCR test should be investigated for violating the Declaration of Geneva .
This includes the inhumane isolation of our elderly and restricting their access to loved ones .
7 .
False positives are causing harm and unnecessary suffering to Australians .
Two of Australia ’ s youngest Covid-19 ‘ victims ’ were found at autopsy to not be positive to Covid-19 .
Their false positive tests were declared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the media instilling fear in the public and helping to justify the government response .
This is immoral and unethical .
No positive test should be declared a ‘ case ’ until it is proven with accompanying symptoms and a second positive test 18,19 .
A nurse was vilified for traveling to an area of Qld where one of the young victims , Nathan Turner was supposedly infected20 .
Blaming an innocent person for the death of a young man is disgraceful behaviour of which the government and media should issue an apology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Payments are being made to retirement homes , testing facilities and to individuals for Covid-19 testing .
This practice contributes to a great risk of fraud committed for the purpose of receiving extra money .
This is highly unethical .
We have heard reports of Covid-19 being added to death certificates in aged care so that the victim ’ s family and the residence benefit financially .
There are also allegations that Doctors receive money for attributing deaths to Covid-19 on death certificates .
As Covid-19 death is not ‘ reportable ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is absolutely zero proof that anyone has died from Covid-19 .
In fact , 2 of the victims that were autopsied , were found to not have Covid-19 at all .
Julia Morgan from Glenferrie Private Hospital confirmed that the cause of death of four patients was unable to be confirmed but the State went ahead and declared their deaths due to Covid-1921 .
This is outrageous .
9 .
It is extremely concerning that there is no independent body to assess the use of PCR tests for detecting Covid-19 .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ validation of the BGI test are the same scientists who are developing vaccines for Covid-19 as well as other research .
They also received a $ 2 million donation from social networking platform , TikTok for Covid-19 related research22 .
This is a major conflict of interest and it is a great matter of public safety that an independent body be engaged to complete a thorough evaluation of all PCR testing and analysis processes .
10 .
Community testing is getting out of control with the test being abused .
Asymptomatic people are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intended to be used this way , this is fuelled by financial incentives .
$ 450 is offered for a test and $ 1500 for a positive test , subject to conditions .
Premier Dan Andrews threatens citizens that restrictions will not be lifted if testing levels drop23 .
He is also ramping up workplace testing24 .
11 .
The nasal swab to retrieve a sample is not without its risks .
There has been one report of a woman whose brain lining was punctured leaking fluid and requiring surgery25 .
A 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after the swab got stuck in his nasal passage26 .
Dr Stuckelberger from Switzerland reported concerns that it is an extremely sensitive area with a very high possibility that nanoparticles can be transferred from the swab into the brain27 .
12 .
Dr David Rasnick has expressed concerns that the DNA when a swab is taken is being stored in government databases .
Patients are not informed of this when they are tested and they do not give their consent for their DNA to be stored .
There is no guarantee that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on or sold to another body .
This is an illegal breach of privacy and trust .
Patients must be assured that none of their information taken from a PCR test will be stored or used by third parties .
13 .
A very serious issue has emerged from Geneva where Doctor Edouard Broussalian sent unused PCR tests to a lab , they all came back with a positive result28 .
Dr Sherri Tenpenny also stated that PCR tests had been receive that were already infected , in many Countries including Slovakia and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could have untold consequences , either infecting them or delivering a positive test result29 .
14 .
Governments are undertaking testing in sewerage , if this type of random and unscientific measures continue , the virus will never go away , PCR testing will keep giving positive results if the amplification is high enough .
15 .
Autopsies are not being carried out on Covid-19 victims .
This is extremely suspicious .
All suspected Covid-19 deaths should be reportable and investigated by the coroner .
As already stated , 2 victims that were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demanding autopsies on all victims could bring many answers to the people of Australia .
PCR tests results have been used by the government to justify implementation of strict and drastic measures that have negatively impacted on people ’ s lives and resulted in many deaths .
The results have been a violation of human rights by removing freedom , destroying businesses , isolating and torturing our elderly , causing a major mental health crisis , causing great suffering to children and families , greater poverty , increased suicides and other unnecessary deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PTSD as a direct result of Government measures .
This is a clear act of misfeasance .
This practice needs to be ceased immediately and I urge you to recall all PCR testing equipment and demand that any government measures that were applied based on these test statistics be immediately ceased .
A proper evaluation needs to be conducted and a thorough investigation must be launched into the misconduct by the government in relation to PCR testing .
In the event of inaction by the TGA , I will be seeking legal advice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law .

Complaint by Danielle Burnie to the TGA of Australia re PCR tests.
By Danielle Burnie
Professor John Skerritt
Therapeutic Goods Association
info@tga.gov.au
devices@tga.gov.au
PO Box 100
Woden ACT 2606
Australia
CC: Australian Department of Health; Office of Health Protection; The Public Health Laboratory Network; The Advisory Committee on Medicines; Australian Medical Association; Political bodies; media outlets; Australia Federal Police; Victoria Police; The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; Parliament of Australia; Australian Human Rights Commission; My Aged Care.
FORMAL COMPLAINT – PCR TESTING AUSTRALIA
Dear Mr Skerritt,
I am writing to make an official complaint about the medical device and subsequent testing process for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia.
The PCR tests being used in Australia were expediated due to the ‘pandemic’ nature of Covid-19. This means they have been approved based on very limited clinical and performance data.
It is well and truly overdue that the PCR testing be properly and thoroughly evaluated.
Before this occurs, I urge you to call an immediate cessation to the use of these testing devices in Australia.
These tests are being used by the government to justify measures protecting against a pandemic. The pandemic was declared by the WHO and it should be noted that the WHO changed the definition of a ‘pandemic’ 12 years ago, a pandemic was originally defined as a disease that spread worldwide resulting in widespread serious illness and death. Now it merely requires that a disease spread worldwide. If we, in Australia accept this definition, it makes it very easy to declare a pandemic when a screening tool like PCR tests are used as diagnostic tools. The number of deaths and ‘cases’ in Australia does not merit the declaration of a pandemic here, especially when these numbers are based on PCR testing.
The Government is using these tests results not only in Australia but the rest of the world, where PCR is also being used, to justify the following (not limited to):
Passing laws to give unprecedented authority to civilians (Omnibus).
Passing federal laws to enable foreign troops and foreign police forces to enter Australia in the event of an emergency, immune from prosecution. (Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020.
Violating privacy by the proposed use of telephone GPS for contact tracing.
Border closures
200+ days and counting of severe restrictions on the state of Victoria including:
Limits on numbers of visitors in households
Limits on numbers of contacts outside the home
Shutting down of schools
Businesses closed
5km radius restriction from homes
Denied access of visitors to retirement homes
Isolation of ‘suspected’ or ‘confirmed’ cases
Mandatory wearing of masks in public
Mandatory wearing of masks by children in school
Limit of 1 hour exercise per day
A nightly curfew between 8pm – 5am
Social distancing.
A vaccination campaign has already begun with policies such as no jab, no pay. No jab, no travel. This is a serious and provocative threat by the government and once again justified in their opinion by ‘case’ numbers.
The physiological and psychological consequences of these policies will have devastating and uncountable consequences on the lives of all Australians. The deaths and permanent injuries caused will outnumber by thousands any death or permanent injury caused by Covid-19.
The weight that is being placed on the statistics is monumental. And the statistics are all being derived from PCR testing.
You have a responsibility to investigate this medical fraud, I do not use that term lightly. But there is enough evidence for me to be extremely concerned that this is exactly that, medical fraud.
Please see below the information I have gathered about PCR testing.
1. The TGA’s own ‘information for health professionals’ page says there is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available Covid-19 tests. AND ‘Covid-19 is an emerging viral infectious disease. There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available Covid-19 tests’.
2. PCR TESTING DOES NOT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COVID-19 AND INFLUENZA
The Covid-19 virus has never been isolated. Each and every positive test is an ‘assumption’ that the test is picking up the SARS-CoV-2 virus. As confirmed by the CDC1.
‘The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen’.
In the user guide of one test available in Australia, it clearly states the PCR test does not distinguish between SARS-CoV-2, influenza, RSV A and B types. The guide goes on to say that a positive result should be evaluated by a health care professional in the context of medical history, symptoms and other tests2.
In September 2020, Roche Pharmaceuticals developed a unique PCR test that distinguishes between the flu and Covid-19. This has received emergency authorisation in the US3. This clearly shows that before this date no tests were able to distinguish between Covid-19 and the flu.
3. THE SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED
A FOI request to Public Health England revealed that the virus has not been isolated4. The FOI response can be found in the references.
Public Health England also confirmed that detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact nor infectious5.
Dr Andrew Kaufman criticised a paper published in Nature which claims to prove the pathogenicity of Covid-19. Dr Kaufman disproved the study showing that SARS-CoV-2 does not meet Koch’s 4 postulates for germ theory. Koch’s postulates are the basic principles that must be met before a virus can be proved to cause disease6.
This is collaborated in another article showing that SARS-CoV-2 fails to meet even one of Koch’s postulates let alone them all7. This is a vital point that has been deliberately ignored by governments worldwide.
PCR tests are calibrated to match a specific RNA, but we do not know that the RNA is specifically from the SARS-CoV-2 virus because it has never been correctly isolated or purified. So, to which RNA are the PCR tests showing positive?
In an article titled ‘PCR Covid-19 Test are Scientifically Meaningless’, study authors of all relevant papers (‘proving the existence of SARS-CoV-2) were contacted and they all confirmed that the shots depicted in their experiments did not show purified viruses8.
4. FALSE POSITIVES
PCR tests have a false positive rate of around 0.8%. Dr Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer states ‘The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 percent or near certainty’9.
According to Dr Malcolm Kendrick10, the negative percentage agreement (NPA) of most commercially available tests is 95.6%. If we look at a practical example using the UK figures (since Australia’s ‘cases’ are so low), it would look like this: From 350,001 tests, 2, 948 were positive. Using the NPA we get the following figures:
0.956 = TN / 350,100
Therefore, the number of true negatives is:
TN = 350,100 * 0.956 = 334696
Therefore, the number of false positives we would expect from 350,100 tests is: FP = 350,100 – 334,696 = 15,404
This is more than five times the number of positive tests reported, which means we cannot have any confidence that any one of those positive tests represents a genuine case. When you apply this to the Australian cases, the numbers are so drastically low that it is statistically impossible for any of them to be true positives. The question is ‘where are all the false positives’?
Contributing to the evidence of false positives, a study called ‘Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection: the danger of over-reliance on positive test results’ found the following: ‘The high specificities (usually 100%) reported in PCR-based tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection do not represent the real-world use of these tests, where contamination and human error produce significant rates of false positives. Widespread lack of awareness of the real-world false positive rates affects an array of clinical, case management and health policy decisions. Similarly, health authorities’ guidance on interpreting test results is often wrong. Steps should be taken immediately to reduce the frequency and impacts of false positive results, including checking positive results with additional tests at least when prevalence is low11’.
Another study, ‘An optimisation of four SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR assays in a Kenyan laboratory to support the national COVID-19 rapid response teams’, found the following: ‘We highlight the challenges encountered in the use of the BGI kit that we noted was prone to false positives, but this was mitigated by diluting the reagent volumes and by including an additional confirmatory assay12.
It should be noted that Victoria is using the BGI kits.
A study on the potential false positive rates of asymptomatic patients found that ‘In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives,’ the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%’13.
Dr Reiner Fuellmich14 from the German Corona Investigative Committee explains that the developer of the Covid-19 PCR test, Professor Drosten used an old SARS virus to create the PCR test which returned a positive from Covid-19 victims in China. This very inaccurate beginning was enough for the WHO to declare a pandemic and authorise worldwide use of PCR testing. They have never validated Drosten’s test. Drosten himself said in 2014 that PCR testing was so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive.
This test cannot detect infection. An infection is when a virus penetrates cells and causes symptoms and only then is a person contagious. Until then, it is completely harmless.
Alarmingly, in 2007 PCR tests were responsible for the incorrect belief that whooping cough was spreading through a hospital in New Hampshire, US. This mistake had serious ramifications. Thousands were given antibiotics and vaccines. 8 months later the victims received an email saying the tests were incorrect due to their over sensitivity15. There is a very high chance this is happening around the world now, especially in Australia given the extremely low case numbers. However, the ramifications here, are even more serious than just antibiotics and vaccines (although this is also incredibly concerning).
5. All tests have a margin of error, this is not being taken into account by the Victorian Government, or any of the State jurisdictions. If the margin of error was applied (2 – 3%) there would be ZERO Covid-19 cases or deaths in Australia.
6. The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed that Victoria uses a CT of 35 – 40. This is a deliberate and malicious misuse of this screening tool. According to Professor Raoult from France, any sample amplified above 35 is not viable for analysis. 97% of positive tests at a cycle above 35 are diluted so much they are no longer viable for testing.
Up to 35CT there are still living virus cells, anything from 35CT, there are only dead virus cells. Using such a high amplification dilutes the sample to practically water and leaves debris of dead virus cells that are detected16.
Any positive result in this case does not indicate that a person is sick or infectious and yet these positive results are declared a ‘case’. The sample should not be amplified over 30CT. Even with 30CT, the sample is amplified by 1,000,000,000 (one billion), with the temperature changes that occur during the process the sample is very compromised. Dr Raoult recommends a CT of 25.
On top of this, the definition of a ‘case’ should never be someone who tests positive. A case must be determined based on other evidence such as the person exhibiting related symptoms and a second confirmed test.
Using a CT value higher than 40 goes against the MIQE guidelines. ‘A CT value higher than 40 is extremely suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported’ ‘Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real Time PCR Experiments’17.
A person can shed RNA for 3 months, so the immune system has already killed the virus but tiny debris can be left which is picked up in a PCR test sample amplified above 35. This can also account for ‘mysterious’ cases where a person tests positive again weeks or months after their initial positive test.
A false positive result that is being treated as a ‘case’ goes against the Hippocratic Oath as all sorts of treatments and restrictions are imposed on a person. Any Doctor who makes treatment decisions or support government restrictions based on a positive PCR test should be investigated for violating the Declaration of Geneva. This includes the inhumane isolation of our elderly and restricting their access to loved ones.
7. False positives are causing harm and unnecessary suffering to Australians. Two of Australia’s youngest Covid-19 ‘victims’ were found at autopsy to not be positive to Covid-19. Their false positive tests were declared as cases by the Government and by the media instilling fear in the public and helping to justify the government response. This is immoral and unethical. No positive test should be declared a ‘case’ until it is proven with accompanying symptoms and a second positive test 18,19.
A nurse was vilified for traveling to an area of Qld where one of the young victims, Nathan Turner was supposedly infected20. Blaming an innocent person for the death of a young man is disgraceful behaviour of which the government and media should issue an apology, this was never done.
8. Payments are being made to retirement homes, testing facilities and to individuals for Covid-19 testing. This practice contributes to a great risk of fraud committed for the purpose of receiving extra money. This is highly unethical. We have heard reports of Covid-19 being added to death certificates in aged care so that the victim’s family and the residence benefit financially. There are also allegations that Doctors receive money for attributing deaths to Covid-19 on death certificates. As Covid-19 death is not ‘reportable’, victims are not autopsied which means there is absolutely zero proof that anyone has died from Covid-19. In fact, 2 of the victims that were autopsied, were found to not have Covid-19 at all.
Julia Morgan from Glenferrie Private Hospital confirmed that the cause of death of four patients was unable to be confirmed but the State went ahead and declared their deaths due to Covid-1921. This is outrageous.
9. It is extremely concerning that there is no independent body to assess the use of PCR tests for detecting Covid-19. The Doherty institute who performed the post market validation of the BGI test are the same scientists who are developing vaccines for Covid-19 as well as other research. They also received a $2 million donation from social networking platform, TikTok for Covid-19 related research22. This is a major conflict of interest and it is a great matter of public safety that an independent body be engaged to complete a thorough evaluation of all PCR testing and analysis processes.
10. Community testing is getting out of control with the test being abused. Asymptomatic people are being tested and the test is not intended to be used this way, this is fuelled by financial incentives. $450 is offered for a test and $1500 for a positive test, subject to conditions. Premier Dan Andrews threatens citizens that restrictions will not be lifted if testing levels drop23. He is also ramping up workplace testing24.
11. The nasal swab to retrieve a sample is not without its risks. There has been one report of a woman whose brain lining was punctured leaking fluid and requiring surgery25. A 1 and a half-year-old died in Saudi Arabia after the swab got stuck in his nasal passage26. Dr Stuckelberger from Switzerland reported concerns that it is an extremely sensitive area with a very high possibility that nanoparticles can be transferred from the swab into the brain27.
12. Dr David Rasnick has expressed concerns that the DNA when a swab is taken is being stored in government databases. Patients are not informed of this when they are tested and they do not give their consent for their DNA to be stored. There is no guarantee that this DNA will not be used or passed on or sold to another body. This is an illegal breach of privacy and trust. Patients must be assured that none of their information taken from a PCR test will be stored or used by third parties.
13. A very serious issue has emerged from Geneva where Doctor Edouard Broussalian sent unused PCR tests to a lab, they all came back with a positive result28. Dr Sherri Tenpenny also stated that PCR tests had been receive that were already infected, in many Countries including Slovakia and Germany. Using these on innocent people could have untold consequences, either infecting them or delivering a positive test result29.
14. Governments are undertaking testing in sewerage, if this type of random and unscientific measures continue, the virus will never go away, PCR testing will keep giving positive results if the amplification is high enough.
15. Autopsies are not being carried out on Covid-19 victims. This is extremely suspicious. All suspected Covid-19 deaths should be reportable and investigated by the coroner. As already stated, 2 victims that were autopsied were not positive to Covid-19, demanding autopsies on all victims could bring many answers to the people of Australia.
PCR tests results have been used by the government to justify implementation of strict and drastic measures that have negatively impacted on people’s lives and resulted in many deaths. The results have been a violation of human rights by removing freedom, destroying businesses, isolating and torturing our elderly, causing a major mental health crisis, causing great suffering to children and families, greater poverty, increased suicides and other unnecessary deaths. The people of Australia are suffering PTSD as a direct result of Government measures.
This is a clear act of misfeasance. This practice needs to be ceased immediately and I urge you to recall all PCR testing equipment and demand that any government measures that were applied based on these test statistics be immediately ceased. A proper evaluation needs to be conducted and a thorough investigation must be launched into the misconduct by the government in relation to PCR testing.
In the event of inaction by the TGA, I will be seeking legal advice to pursue private criminal prosecution under common law.
Yours sincerely,
Danielle Burnie


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--OPEN LETTER BY Alexander Cooney, Senior Constable, NSW against the Police State across Australia

OPEN LETTER BY Alexander Cooney , Senior Constable , NSW against the Police State across Australia .
RE : Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19 , which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force .
Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus , our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens , using the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus , most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed , until more was learnt about the virus .
With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [ 1 ] and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia , indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to 150,000 Australian deaths [ 2 ] , it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease .
Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “ no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available ” .
[ 3 ] So even without the virus being isolated , the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing .
We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors , such that experts who later reviewed it have said “ no serious scientist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
[ 4 , 5 ] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best , with the inventor stating it should “ never be used to diagnose infectious disease ” , because it can not tell if what it detected is alive or dead .
[ 6 , 7 , 8 ] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety .
In the same way we can not use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such , police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19 , or rely on any outcome of the results .
Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon , in place of flawed computer modelling , these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections , which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response .
For example , we now know that around 45 % of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9 ] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2 % We also know that 80 % of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immunocompromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death .
At the time of writing , the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3 % .
The ordinary flu is 99.9 % .
Furthermore , statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise , the percentage of deaths is plummeting .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ reality : – Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did .
Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages , their death rate is comparable , and Taiwan ’ s is outstanding : – The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe , but very low deaths ; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not .
What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We note from the recent Federal budget , huge debt and unemployment , is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses .
In our line of work , we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track , as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing .
We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WHO recently stated “ We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus , ” So in spite of the facts , as they stand now , it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality of the situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk .
The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised .
[ 16 , 17 , 18 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 when over 121 peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease [ 20 , 21 , Instead , the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca and Australians told we can not expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives .
AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products , making false claims , kickbacks and bribery , consumer protection violation , healthcare offences , government-contracting violations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been fined over US $ 1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations .
Still , they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine Alarmingly , Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “ as mandatory as you can possibly make it ” in spite of the criminal record of its producer , their exemption from liability claims , the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine ; shown to be effective treatments and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a serious threat to the healthy .
It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests , not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed .
All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response , yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent , with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable .
We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia .
States and territories can not rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to , yet this is occurring .
Under the state of emergency , the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions can not request an individual to be isolated , detained , tested , vaccinated , medically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual .
These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015 .
[ 28 ] ( Emergency and public health powers , at the States and Territories , do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual ’ s human rights by isolating them , or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first ) .
There is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan [ 30 ] .
This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework .
Article 7 of the international convenient of civil and political rights states “ no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman , or degrading treatment or punishment , in particular , no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
” [ 31 ] Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty.
” [ 32 ] Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states “ no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment , in particular , no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation .
[ 33 ] Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “ when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former shall to the extent of the inconsistency being valid.
” [ 34 ] With federal and international legislation breaches , it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia , potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [ 35 ] , as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [ 36 ] Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do our part to stop this oppression , so we are writing to you to raise the following issues : ‑ • Police Force employees have ‘ choice ’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines ; • The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines ; • Police do not participate in any way in the forcing of vaccines upon the population ; • That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated • To raise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population ; and • To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests , rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population , not tyranny of government .
Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity , including high profile Judges and QC ’ s [ 37 ] , The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public intellectuals including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government Advocate Me ’ s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [ 39 ] , as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of ‘ the experts ’ , all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules .
We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which : • Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals ; • Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing ; • Capitalises on the wealth of human resources ; • Makes efficient and economical use of public resources ; and Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community , including our family and friends .
And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests .
This contradiction is further destroying public confidence .
We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country , to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners , or sign our form at to show your support for this stance , which we have called Cops for Covid Truth .
With trust in our police force now seriously eroded , we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our State and Country back to normality .

OPEN LETTER BY Alexander Cooney, Senior Constable, NSW against the Police State across Australia.
By Alexander Cooney
October 26, 2020
To: Michael Fuller
Police Commissioner of New South Wales
RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions
We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force.
Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules.
Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus.
With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [1] and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to 150,000 Australian deaths [2], it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply.
With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”. [3] So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing.
We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors, such that experts who later reviewed it have said “no serious scientist gives (it) any validity”. [4, 5] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best, with the inventor stating it should “never be used to diagnose infectious disease”, because it cannot tell if what it detected is alive or dead. [6, 7, 8] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety.
In the same way we cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor a civilian’s speed, the same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such, police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19, or rely on any outcome of the results.
Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon, in place of flawed computer modelling, these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections, which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response.
For example, we now know that around 45% of people who contract the virus are asymptomatic [9] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2% [10]. We also know that 80% of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms [11] and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immunocompromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death. [12]
At the time of writing, the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3%. [13] The ordinary flu is 99.9%. [14]
Furthermore, statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise, the percentage of deaths is plummeting.
Here are some statistics which reflect this reality: –
Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did. Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages, their death rate is comparable, and Taiwan’s is outstanding: –
The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe, but very low deaths; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not. What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways have resulted in much the same outcome.
We note from the recent Federal budget, huge debt and unemployment, is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses. In our line of work, we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track, as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing.
We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response, yet Dr David Nabarro of the WHO recently stated “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” [15]
So in spite of the facts, as they stand now, it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality of the situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk. The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised. [16, 17, 18]
What is even more concerning is the prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 [19], when over 121 peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease [20, 21, 22] . Instead, the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca [23] and Australians told we cannot expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives.
AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products, making false claims, kickbacks and bribery, consumer protection violation, healthcare offences, government-contracting violations and more. Since 2000 they have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations. [24] Still, they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine [25] .
Alarmingly, Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “as mandatory as you can possibly make it” [26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin [27] and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed.
All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response, yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. The evidence would suggest resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable.
We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia. States and territories cannot rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to, yet this is occurring.
Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.
These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28]
(Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first).
There is an inter-governmental agreement [29] which places the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan [30]. This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework.
Article 7 of the international convenient of civil and political rights states “no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” [31]
Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law of treatise “A party may not invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty.” [32]
Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states “no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. [33]
Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency being valid.” [34]
With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [36] .
Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:‑
Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines;
The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines;
Police do not participate in any way in the forcing of vaccines upon the population;
That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated
To raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; and
To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government.
Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity, including high profile Judges and QC’s [37], The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public intellectuals including 15 professors of relevant disciplines, one of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government [38], Advocate Me’s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [39], as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity [40]. Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of ‘the experts’, all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules.
We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force statement of values: –
Each member of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which:
Places integrity above all;
Upholds the rule of law;
Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals;
Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing;
Strives for citizen and police personal satisfaction;
Capitalises on the wealth of human resources;
Makes efficient and economical use of public resources; and
Ensures that authority is exercised responsibly.
Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence.
We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country, to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or sign our form at https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth to show your support for this stance, which we have called Cops for Covid Truth.
With trust in our police force now seriously eroded, we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust, by being an integral part of returning our State and Country back to normality.
Regards
Alexander Cooney
Senior Constable Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol
NSW Police Force Grafton Police Station
5 Duke Street Grafton NSW 2460
And other signatories


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--If you think you would take a Covid Vaccine you won’t dare after you watch this

If you think you would take a Covid Vaccine you won ’ t dare after you watch this .
Need @ @ @ @ @ doesn ’ t take long , but it is extremely alarming .
By the way @ @ @ @ @ attempt to block it .
No surprise that they are trying to hide the truth @

If you think you would take a Covid Vaccine you won’t dare after you watch this.
By Jeremy Ramsey
Need to watch this. It doesn’t take long, but it is extremely alarming. By the way, ignore Facebook’s attempt to block it.
No surprise that they are trying to hide the truth.


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--Iran’s New Crypto Law Requires Miners to Sell Bitcoin Directly to Central Bank to Fund Imports

Iran ’ s New Crypto Law Requires Miners to Sell Bitcoin Directly to Central Bank to Fund Imports .
Iran has reportedly revised the country ’ s cryptocurrency regulation to require licensed bitcoin miners to sell their coins directly to the central bank for use to fund imports .
The Iranian government has amended its cryptocurrency regulation to enable the country ’ s central bank to fund imports with bitcoin legally mined in the country , the government-controlled IRNA news agency reported on Saturday .
Iranian publication Financial Tribune conveyed : “ The Ministry of Energy is tasked with defining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ units subject to the energy consumed by each unit .
Miners ’ output should not exceed the ceiling , ” the publication added , noting that the central bank will soon announce details of the new law .
Mostafa Rajabi Mashhadi , deputy head of Iran ’ s Power Generation , Distribution , and Transmission Company ( Tavanir ) and the spokesperson for the power industry , confirmed that “ These cryptocurrencies can be exchanged according to the regulations set by the central bank , ” Mehr news agency quoted him as saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and documentary network affiliated with the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting ( IRIB ) , explained : “ The miners are supposed to supply the original cryptocurrency directly and within the authorized limit to the channels introduced by the CBI … The legal cap for the amount of cryptocurrency for each miner would be determined by the level of the subsidized energy used for mining and based on instructions published by the Ministry of the Energy.
” Cryptocurrency analyst Alireza Shamkhi told ISNA news agency that the new law is vague and ambiguous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state how the central bank will price cryptocurrencies or the exchange rate between dollars and rials .
Previously , miners could exchange their cryptocurrencies for dollars , rials , or other currencies at market prices .
He added that the requirement for miners to report their output to the central bank is not seen in other industries , concluding that the new law will likely reduce the industry ’ s attractiveness and significantly lower miners ’ profit margin .
Iran has issued over 1,000 licenses to crypto miners , including one to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plants in Iran are allowed to mine cryptocurrencies and bitcoin miners have been granted exclusive access to electricity generated from three of them .
Meanwhile , over a thousand illegal bitcoin miners have been shut down .

Iran’s New Crypto Law Requires Miners to Sell Bitcoin Directly to Central Bank to Fund Imports.
By Kevin Helms
Iran has reportedly revised the country’s cryptocurrency regulation to require licensed bitcoin miners to sell their coins directly to the central bank for use to fund imports.
Iran’s Revised Crypto Law
The Iranian government has amended its cryptocurrency regulation to enable the country’s central bank to fund imports with bitcoin legally mined in the country, the government-controlled IRNA news agency reported on Saturday. Iranian publication Financial Tribune conveyed:
The measure proposed by the Central Bank of Iran [CBI] and the Ministry of Energy requires licensed cryptominers to sell the coins they mine directly to the CBI.
“The Ministry of Energy is tasked with defining a ceiling for output of authorized crypto units subject to the energy consumed by each unit. Miners’ output should not exceed the ceiling,” the publication added, noting that the central bank will soon announce details of the new law.
Mostafa Rajabi Mashhadi, deputy head of Iran’s Power Generation, Distribution, and Transmission Company (Tavanir) and the spokesperson for the power industry, confirmed that “These cryptocurrencies can be exchanged according to the regulations set by the central bank,” Mehr news agency quoted him as saying.
Presstv, an Iranian state-owned news and documentary network affiliated with the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), explained: “The miners are supposed to supply the original cryptocurrency directly and within the authorized limit to the channels introduced by the CBI … The legal cap for the amount of cryptocurrency for each miner would be determined by the level of the subsidized energy used for mining and based on instructions published by the Ministry of the Energy.”
Cryptocurrency analyst Alireza Shamkhi told ISNA news agency that the new law is vague and ambiguous. For example, it does not state how the central bank will price cryptocurrencies or the exchange rate between dollars and rials. Previously, miners could exchange their cryptocurrencies for dollars, rials, or other currencies at market prices. He added that the requirement for miners to report their output to the central bank is not seen in other industries, concluding that the new law will likely reduce the industry’s attractiveness and significantly lower miners’ profit margin.
Iran has issued over 1,000 licenses to crypto miners, including one to the Turkish bitcoin mining giant Iminer. Power plants in Iran are allowed to mine cryptocurrencies and bitcoin miners have been granted exclusive access to electricity generated from three of them. Meanwhile, over a thousand illegal bitcoin miners have been shut down.


australiannationalreview--2020-11-03--Washington D.C. Preparing for Protests By Boarding Up

Washington D.C .
Preparing for Protests By Boarding Up Washington D.C .
Preparing for Protests with hundreds of buildings now @ @ @ @ @ what media is telling you , business owners say that they believe if Trump loses @ @ @ @ @ , NOT the other way around .


australiannationalreview--2020-11-05--Trump WINS election; Democrats now working overtime to STEAL it by fabricating hundreds of thousands

Trump WINS election; Democrats now working overtime to STEAL it by fabricating hundreds of thousands of votes

( Natural News ) Trump won the election last night , taking Georgia , Pennsylvania , Michigan , Wisconsin and North Carolina , among anchor states like Florida and Texas .
In Pennsylvania Trump was ahead by nearly 700,000 votes .
In Michigan Trump was ahead by over 300,000 votes .
In Wisconsin Trump was ahead by 120,000 votes .
But in the middle of the night Democrats went to work stealing the election by fabricating fake voting numbers in Michigan and Wisconsin .
To carry out the fraud , the Dems shut down vote reporting until 3:30 am , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden jumped up 200,000 votes without a single vote for Trump .
This is the rigging under way : And in Michigan , the vote magically jumped up 138,000 for Biden in the middle of the night , without a single new vote for Trump .
It ’ s rigged !
“ Last night I was leading , often solidly , in many key States , in almost all instances Democrat run & controlled , ” Trump wrote at around 10 a.m .
ET .
“ Then , one by one , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dumps were counted .
VERY STRANGE , and the ‘ pollsters ’ got it completely & historically wrong !
” Big League Politics also reports on the apparent fraud that took place in the middle of the night , while America slept : …tens of thousands of absentee ballots arrived in large U.S .
Postal Service boxes at the TCF Center in Detroit , Mich. on Wednesday morning at 3:30 am .
The TCF Center , formerly Cobo Hall , is where the absentee ballots are counted for Wayne County , which is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state senator Patrick Colbeck wrote that the total number of ballots dumped on the counting board totaled 38,000… According to Michigan election law , all of these mail-in and absentee ballots had to be submitted before 8pm on Tuesday night in order to be lawfully accepted and counted for the election .
This means the city of Detroit potentially sat on these ballots for hours .
Vote counting was shut down so that ballot stuffing and rigging could be carried out in the middle of the night Democrats run Wisconsin , Michigan and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down their vote counting so they could engage in vote rigging , and in the middle of the night , hundreds of thousands of votes appeared for Biden , putting Biden in the lead and crushing Trump ’ s legitimate voting victory .
Last night , Trump warned this is exactly what would happen , saying : This is a fraud on the American public .
We were getting ready to win this election .
Frankly , we won this election .
This is a major fraud on the election .
So we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court .
We want all of the voting to stop .
We don ’ t want them to find any votes at 4 in the morning .
We will win this and as far as I am concerned we already won !
The Democrats , Big Tech , the media and some state election leaders are working together to steal this election from President Trump .
The President is winning .
All night last night the media got together and failed to call big states that showed Trump winning .
The President led @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but the media would not call these states for Trump .
This way the media could keep the narrative alive that Joe Biden was leading in the race .
Meanwhile , Biden has announced his plan to declare victory at 5pm today , after rigging by Michigan and Wisconsin , plus four years of censorship rigging by Big Tech and outrageous news bias by the rigged mainstream media .

By Mike Adams
(Natural News) Trump won the election last night, taking Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina, among anchor states like Florida and Texas.
As TGP reports:
In Pennsylvania Trump was ahead by nearly 700,000 votes.
In Michigan Trump was ahead by over 300,000 votes.
In Wisconsin Trump was ahead by 120,000 votes.
But in the middle of the night Democrats went to work stealing the election by fabricating fake voting numbers in Michigan and Wisconsin.
To carry out the fraud, the Dems shut down vote reporting until 3:30 am, and then magically out of nowhere, Biden jumped up 200,000 votes without a single vote for Trump. This is the rigging under way:
And in Michigan, the vote magically jumped up 138,000 for Biden in the middle of the night, without a single new vote for Trump. It’s rigged!
As The Epoch Times reports:
“Last night I was leading, often solidly, in many key States, in almost all instances Democrat run & controlled,” Trump wrote at around 10 a.m. ET. “Then, one by one, they started to magically disappear as surprise ballot dumps were counted. VERY STRANGE, and the ‘pollsters’ got it completely & historically wrong!”
Big League Politics also reports on the apparent fraud that took place in the middle of the night, while America slept:
…tens of thousands of absentee ballots arrived in large U.S. Postal Service boxes at the TCF Center in Detroit, Mich. on Wednesday morning at 3:30 am. The TCF Center, formerly Cobo Hall, is where the absentee ballots are counted for Wayne County, which is the home of Detroit.
Former Michigan state senator Patrick Colbeck wrote that the total number of ballots dumped on the counting board totaled 38,000…
According to Michigan election law, all of these mail-in and absentee ballots had to be submitted before 8pm on Tuesday night in order to be lawfully accepted and counted for the election. This means the city of Detroit potentially sat on these ballots for hours.
Vote counting was shut down so that ballot stuffing and rigging could be carried out in the middle of the night
Democrats run Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, and last night they shut down their vote counting so they could engage in vote rigging, and in the middle of the night, hundreds of thousands of votes appeared for Biden, putting Biden in the lead and crushing Trump’s legitimate voting victory.
This is outright theft!
Last night, Trump warned this is exactly what would happen, saying:
This is a fraud on the American public. We were getting ready to win this election. Frankly, we won this election. This is a major fraud on the election. So we will be going to the US Supreme Court. We want all of the voting to stop. We don’t want them to find any votes at 4 in the morning. We will win this and as far as I am concerned we already won!
As The Gateway Pundit reports:
The Democrats, Big Tech, the media and some state election leaders are working together to steal this election from President Trump. The President is winning.
All night last night the media got together and failed to call big states that showed Trump winning. The President led in Florida and Texas for hours, but the media would not call these states for Trump. This way the media could keep the narrative alive that Joe Biden was leading in the race.
Meanwhile, Biden has announced his plan to declare victory at 5pm today, after rigging by Michigan and Wisconsin, plus four years of censorship rigging by Big Tech and outrageous news bias by the rigged mainstream media.


australiannationalreview--2020-11-05--Evidence of democratic voter fraud to steal the Us Election

We count on YOU to make our work possible .
Today , a generous supporter will match your new monthly @ @ @ @ @ Review meaning your donation will go twice as far .
This is a challenging time @ @ @ @ @ if you ’ re able to make a monthly donation and provide us with support @ @ @ @ @ year , please do so today .
We also ask you apart from sharing our @ @ @ @ @ information to us , to contact mainstream media advertisers and tell them if they don @ @ @ @ @ their advertising to independent media such as the Australian National Review then you will boycott @ @ @ @ @ one way to hit mainstream media where it hurts them the most Help us help @ @ @ @ @ our freedoms .
If you have a business please consider advertising with us or sponsoring @ @ @ @ @ readers who will support companies that don ’ t support mainstream media .
As a @ @ @ @ @ to raise millions to compete against our foreign billion dollar mainstream media competitors .