australiannationalreview--2020-04-29--Assemblyman Jamel Holley: ‘ I saw the faces of the children, tightly wrapped up in warm winter cloth

Assemblyman Jamel Holley: ‘ I saw the faces of the children, tightly wrapped up in warm winter clothing for long hours into the late night. Some of those children – sadly – were injured from vaccines’

As I sat in the Statehouse Assembly Chambers last month , I heard echoes from the voices of desperate parents seeking to be heard on the one parental right they have : the protection of their children !
In the mixture of these echoes were those I heard saying , “ Protect our freedom and religion ; it ’ s our right.
” And then I saw the faces of the children , tightly wrapped up in warm winter clothing for long hours into the late night .
Some of those children – sadly – were injured from vaccines .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ officials , and supporters all united – side by side – gathered by the thousands , inside , outside and around the public areas of the Statehouse .
This drama unfolded following weeks of vocal outrage .
I received more than 3,000 emails opposing a proposed bill that would allow state-mandated vaccinations for children , while stripping the law of a religious and medical exemption clause .
The Assembly narrowly passed the bill , funded and fast-tracked by the pharma industry , over my cries of opposition .
I argued that my fellow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debate , nor do I believe that government officials are entitled to remove the right of a parent to protect a child .
I also don ’ t believe government has any say in regards to an individual ’ s religious practice , except in the case of a true emergency .
Appearing in the last desperate attempt to move this bill , a Republican senator proposed a segregation amendment that would mandate all public schools and public day care centers require vaccination .
Families that can afford to attend private schools and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the mandate .
In the State Senate , the bill fell short .
It is 2020 .
How can any Legislature in this country , under the Constitution , entertain such legislation ?
Then I realized there is more to this !
We began this debate about the health and wellness of all children .
So why would we then entertain a segregated piece of legislation that would exclude certain students .
This solely moved the debate from the overall health concern to an even larger question : Why is this hotly-contested bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think we can all agree if it ’ s about the health and wellness of our young ones , there should be a majority of support , not just relying on one majority vote in the legislature .
Legislation to mandate state vaccinations are quickly moving through legislatures in other states , too , including Connecticut , Virginia , Colorado and Illinois .
The requirement already exists in California and New York .
All of these states have legislatures controlled by Democrats .
There is this momentum , but there are many public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No one denies that vaccines can cause severe injury and death – indeed the federal 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act specifically provides compensation for anaphylaxis , encephalopathy or brain injury , chronic arthritis , paralysis and death .
Victims have proven many other adverse effects in the compensation program as well , including severe allergies , asthma , diabetes , autoimmune disorders , lupus , multiple sclerosis and others .
Studies by independent scientists have validated some of these associations .
For instance , a Canadian 2008 study on asthma risk and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology suggested that merely delaying the DPT shot by two months reduced childhood diagnosis of asthma by half .
An article by scientists Gallagher and Goodman published in the peer reviewed literature found a nine-fold association between the hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in boys aged 1-9 .
A study of infant mortality , a key measure of public health , found that countries , like the US , with more infant vaccines have higher death rates in infants in the first year of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These are just a few of thousands of studies on the unintended consequences of vaccines .
But for me , the reality hit home when I heard from hundreds of parents and their children : the real victims in all of this .
And there were other citizens , pleading to keep the religious freedoms afforded to them in the Bill of Rights .
Then the bombshell : The “ vaccine chairwoman ” at Merck Pharmaceutical Co. cashing in her second $ 9.1 million worth of shares .
This information then led @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical and healthcare industry , doled out to my colleagues in all these states pushing for legislation .
Let me be clear : I ’ m not against vaccines .
I believe in medicine for the health of our state .
However , I do not believe that elected officials should be overreaching into the households of parents who are entitled to make informed medical decisions for their children .
Nor do I believe I should be placed in a position to remove a religious exemption for those individuals that chose to exercise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choice !
!
So if this debate should continue , I am even more compelled to side with the people .
In such an effort , I will be introducing a bipartisan bill in the Assembly that fully protects children and holds government accountable for any over-reaching state mandates .
I join Senate Republican sponsors Mike Testa and Joseph Pennacchio on S-1734 that requires health care practitioners to provide information to a patient or the patient ’ s guardian at least 48 hours prior to the administration of a vaccine .
That information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the vaccine produced by the manufacturer for inclusion in the vaccine ’ s packaging and list of the vaccine ingredients produced by the federal Centers for Disease Control .
S-1791 would make the state liable for damages stemming from certain vaccine-related injuries if the vaccination is mandated by state law , rule , or regulation as a condition of attendance at a child care center , preschool program , elementary of secondary school , or institution of higher education , or by emergency declaration , at the time of the vaccine ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also pending introduction , urging the President of the United States and Congress to repeal the federal National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 , which has shielded vaccine manufacturers from liability , removed economic and legal incentives for companies to develop safe vaccines , and made it difficult for those injured by vaccines to receive compensation .
It is for all the above reasons I stand to protect children , parental choice and remain in the front lines of protecting all individuals to exercise their religious freedom , and to protect their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they see fit .
It is with great hope that all my colleagues join in this important fight for families and freedom .
Assemblyman Jamel Holley ( D-Roselle ) represents Elizabeth , Roselle , Union and Hillside in the New Jersey General Assembly .

By Jamel Holley
OPINION
As I sat in the Statehouse Assembly Chambers last month, I heard echoes from the voices of desperate parents seeking to be heard on the one parental right they have: the protection of their children!
In the mixture of these echoes were those I heard saying, “Protect our freedom and religion; it’s our right.”
And then I saw the faces of the children, tightly wrapped up in warm winter clothing for long hours into the late night. Some of those children – sadly – were injured from vaccines.
Parents, children, clergy, elected officials, and supporters all united – side by side – gathered by the thousands, inside, outside and around the public areas of the Statehouse.
This drama unfolded following weeks of vocal outrage. I received more than 3,000 emails opposing a proposed bill that would allow state-mandated vaccinations for children, while stripping the law of a religious and medical exemption clause.
The Assembly narrowly passed the bill, funded and fast-tracked by the pharma industry, over my cries of opposition.
I argued that my fellow lawmakers did not offer enough open public debate, nor do I believe that government officials are entitled to remove the right of a parent to protect a child. I also don’t believe government has any say in regards to an individual’s religious practice, except in the case of a true emergency.
Appearing in the last desperate attempt to move this bill, a Republican senator proposed a segregation amendment that would mandate all public schools and public day care centers require vaccination. Families that can afford to attend private schools and private daycares would not have to follow the mandate. In the State Senate, the bill fell short.
It is 2020. How can any Legislature in this country, under the Constitution, entertain such legislation?
Then I realized there is more to this!
We began this debate about the health and wellness of all children. So why would we then entertain a segregated piece of legislation that would exclude certain students. This solely moved the debate from the overall health concern to an even larger question: Why is this hotly-contested bill being rushed through at all?
I think we can all agree if it’s about the health and wellness of our young ones, there should be a majority of support, not just relying on one majority vote in the legislature.
Legislation to mandate state vaccinations are quickly moving through legislatures in other states, too, including Connecticut, Virginia, Colorado and Illinois. The requirement already exists in California and New York. All of these states have legislatures controlled by Democrats.
There is this momentum, but there are many public facts that should give us pause. No one denies that vaccines can cause severe injury and death – indeed the federal 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act specifically provides compensation for anaphylaxis, encephalopathy or brain injury, chronic arthritis, paralysis and death. Victims have proven many other adverse effects in the compensation program as well, including severe allergies, asthma, diabetes, autoimmune disorders, lupus, multiple sclerosis and others.
Studies by independent scientists have validated some of these associations. For instance, a Canadian 2008 study on asthma risk and the diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccine in the Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology suggested that merely delaying the DPT shot by two months reduced childhood diagnosis of asthma by half. An article by scientists Gallagher and Goodman published in the peer reviewed literature found a nine-fold association between the hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in boys aged 1-9. A study of infant mortality, a key measure of public health, found that countries, like the US, with more infant vaccines have higher death rates in infants in the first year of life than countries with fewer infant vaccines.
These are just a few of thousands of studies on the unintended consequences of vaccines. But for me, the reality hit home when I heard from hundreds of parents and their children: the real victims in all of this.
And there were other citizens, pleading to keep the religious freedoms afforded to them in the Bill of Rights.
Then the bombshell: The “vaccine chairwoman” at Merck Pharmaceutical Co. cashing in her second $9.1 million worth of shares.
This information then led me to the campaign contributions from the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry, doled out to my colleagues in all these states pushing for legislation.
Let me be clear: I’m not against vaccines. I believe in medicine for the health of our state.
However, I do not believe that elected officials should be overreaching into the households of parents who are entitled to make informed medical decisions for their children. Nor do I believe I should be placed in a position to remove a religious exemption for those individuals that chose to exercise that constitutional right. I stand pro choice!!
So if this debate should continue, I am even more compelled to side with the people. In such an effort, I will be introducing a bipartisan bill in the Assembly that fully protects children and holds government accountable for any over-reaching state mandates.
I join Senate Republican sponsors Mike Testa and Joseph Pennacchio on S-1734 that requires health care practitioners to provide information to a patient or the patient’s guardian at least 24 hours prior to the administration of a vaccine. That information must include a copy of the insert for the vaccine produced by the manufacturer for inclusion in the vaccine’s packaging and list of the vaccine ingredients produced by the federal Centers for Disease Control.
S-1791 would make the state liable for damages stemming from certain vaccine-related injuries if the vaccination is mandated by state law, rule, or regulation as a condition of attendance at a child care center, preschool program, elementary of secondary school, or institution of higher education, or by emergency declaration, at the time of the vaccine’s administration.
An Assembly Resolution is also pending introduction, urging the President of the United States and Congress to repeal the federal National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which has shielded vaccine manufacturers from liability, removed economic and legal incentives for companies to develop safe vaccines, and made it difficult for those injured by vaccines to receive compensation.
It is for all the above reasons I stand to protect children, parental choice and remain in the front lines of protecting all individuals to exercise their religious freedom, and to protect their children’s heath as best as they see fit.
It is with great hope that all my colleagues join in this important fight for families and freedom.
Assemblyman Jamel Holley (D-Roselle) represents Elizabeth, Roselle, Union and Hillside in the New Jersey General Assembly.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-29--Australian coronavirus vaccine goes into test production

The batch being brewed at Clayton is merely the first test dose , a process done in part to trial @ @ @ @ @ .
Nevertheless , it shows the incredible progress made by the researchers – less than @ @ @ @ @ recorded coronavirus death , a test vaccine is in production .
After emerging in Wuhan @ @ @ @ @ spread rapidly around the world .
More than 76,000 people have been infected , including @ @ @ @ @ more than 2245 killed so far .
The University of Queensland team began work on @ @ @ @ @ , when the first coronavirus genome – its DNA blueprint – was uploaded to the @ @ @ @ @

The University of Queensland team began work on their vaccine on January 11, when the first coronavirus genome – its DNA blueprint – was uploaded to the internet by Chinese scientists.
More than 76,000 people have been infected, including 15 in Australia, and more than 2245 killed so far.
After emerging in Wuhan in December, COVID-19 has spread rapidly around the world.
Nevertheless, it shows the incredible progress made by the researchers – less than two months after the first recorded coronavirus death, a test vaccine is in production.
The batch being brewed at Clayton is merely the first test dose, a process done in part to trial the factory’s systems.
“We did not need the virus itself. All we needed was the sequence,” said Professor Paul Young.
They quickly identified a section of the virus, known as a spike protein, they would need to target.
To do this, they are using “molecular clamp” technology, an invention developed at the Queensland University by Dr Keith Chappell, Dr Daniel Watterson and Professor Young seven years ago.
The clamps are designed to hold the complex, changing the shape of the spike protein so the human immune system can get a good look at it – and learn to kill it.
“It is a fascinating and quite amazing technology,” said Upulie Divisekera, a molecular biologist at the University of Auckland who is not involved in the project.
The CSIRO’s Clayton factory started manufacturing a pilot dose on Friday morning.
This is done in huge fermenters filled with cells. The cells read DNA instructions and produce the proteins that will go into the vaccine.
“This is the first candidate of possibly many,” said Professor George Lovrecz, research team leader at CSIRO’s manufacturing division.
Once the team’s vaccine is finished, it will be tested on animals, first for safety and then for effectiveness.
If the vaccine is both safe and effective, human trials can begin.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-29--People Should be Warned of the Adverse Health Effects of 5G Mobile Phone Microwave Radiation Technol

People Should be Warned of the Adverse Health Effects of 5G Mobile Phone Microwave Radiation Technology

The Irish Government has consistently failed to meet its obligations from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe with Resolution 1815 in ( 2011 ) , the Phone manufacturers are totally disingenuous , in that they bury the Warnings six deep in their T+C and an Oireachtas Bill No 24 of 2011 , The Mobile Phone Radiation Warning Act 2011 which fell because of the government change was never followed up .
As result of this huge vacuum in reliable health and safety information , nobody in authority is telling our children and pregnant mothers about the dangers of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pulsed Polarised Modulated Microwave Radiation .
It is respected technical journalists like you that need to reinforce and amplify these responsible warnings .
When you say the following in today ’ s article I would think that a huge number of Independent Scientists Worldwide will strongly disagree with your dated assertions .
“ According to Ireland ’ s regulator , this type of radiation only has sufficient energy for “ excitation ” and can ’ t “ break bonds that hold molecules in cells together ” .
This is just 100 % Wrong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is also a Disingenuous Lie and shame on Comreg for repeating and perpetuating a misconception of classical physics .
There are two main issues that confound and amplify the widespread misunderstandings that we are facing today .
The first is a misassumption of Classical Physics in a Biological System , the famous “ Non-Ionizing Radiation Story ” and the second is the historical mistake of using a totally inappropriate “ Thermal Effects Safety Guidelines ” from ICNIRP to the assess safety of the mobile phone microwave radiation .
Physical science tells us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not possess the energy to damage Chemical Covalent Bonds , so it could not damage DNA and is therefore perfectly safe !
This is part of the official disinformation that industry and regulators buy and sell .
The disinformation comes because Microwave Radiation energy is classified in the Electro-Magnetic Spectrum as a Non-Ionising Radiation ( NIR ) and by definition the energy of this radiation is not strong enough to ionise a molecule by breaking a covalent chemical bond .
The typical energy of a covalent bond is in the order of 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joules ) .
The force required to break a covalent bond is in the order of 1 eV/0.1 nm ~ 1600 pN .
( pico Newtons ) The energy in the microwave radiation is well below this level .
At 3 GHz it is 1.8*10⁻²⁴Joules .
So , this is the science that lays out the impossibility of Microwave radiation being able to damage DNA because it is too weak in energy terms to rip the electrons off and break any of the bonds present in DNA .
And this is the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disinformation story rests on .
So , most Engineers will spout out this story , almost as religious Dogma and poo-poo the whole idea of Microwaves causing any negative health effects .
The only problem with the story is the horrible fact that microwave radiation at the levels present in mobile phones does in fact damage DNA .
Not expected , but sadly true .
So , this is the reason why there is so much deliberate confusion , from an Engineering standpoint it is not going to happen , yet in Biology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the science that attests to the reality that the biologists are correct .
It is known as the 2004 EU Reflex Study and the following link gives a summary .
If you read the last paragraph of the article you will see the skulduggery the industry resorted to try to discredit this work .
This is the study that showed 24 hours of mobile phone radiation did the same amount of DNA damage as 60 CT Scans in or 250 years of The Earth ’ s background radiation .
How many people would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 24 hours ?
Science is getting better as time goes by and there are thousands of studies that back up the fact that NIR effects our biology and can in fact damage DNA .
One theory of how this may happen is that NIR in living systems can create “ Free Radicals ” which in turn can damage DNA .
But even if there is some debate as to the nature of the mechanisms that can cause the damage to occur , there is absolutely no debate that DNA damage does take place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Adrian don ’ t take my word for this , you have a simple choice , listen to compromised regulators in Comreg dishing out 30-year-old myths about Non-Ionising Radiation or just Google and see they don ’ t make any sense .
Try to Google ( “ Microwave Radiation ” “ DNA Damage ” ) you may see that there are approx .
53,300 hits on Google .
Now that ’ s not bad for something that can ’ t happen !
And guess what there is even a field of Science called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with many tens of thousands of peer reviewed articles from Scientists all over the world that all working on something COMREG says can ’ t happen .
However even with science on the side of the Biologists , being right is not enough to upset the whole NIR house of cards story that is supported by a multi trillion-euro global business .
Thermal Based Standards Irish ( cut and paste ) ICNIRP guidelines are not a measure of the damage the radiation may be doing to our bodies they are simply a measure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a body .
The ICNIRP thermal-only exposure limit is not safe .
Microwave Radiation Affects our Biology , it has an effect which varies between people but it does have deleterious effects on all life forms .
There are many well documented Bio-effects on our health and well-being , related to mobile phone and wireless technology .
Bioeffects are clearly established and occur even at very low levels of exposure to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation .
Just look at these two web sites which are up to date ( 2019 ) with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ See this and this .
• Evidence for fertility and reproduction effects : Human sperm and DNA damaged • The opening up of the Blood Brain Barrier If you want to learn more about the 8 Bioeffects caused by exposure to RF please read Prof Martin Pall ’ s 91-page review article ( or even just read the two-page summary ) here .
The work that Martin Pall has highlighted on VGCC ’ s and the very simple lab experiments showing direct effect of RF on live cells in a flask with an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposed to RF are so clear , RF at the levels present in mobile phones rapidly releases oxidative species .
Every living entity is different and will react differently to external and internal EMF stimuli .
We know that RF has biological effects what we don ’ t know well enough are the consequences for living creatures .
I have tried to convey to you the complexity of the effects of EMF ’ s on living creatures , we are only beginning to see a little of what goes on at the molecular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporting on 5G is incomplete .
At present the five Irish operations have purchased spectrum only in the 600 MHz to 3.6 GHz frequencies .
These are similar type of frequencies being used in LTE 4G .
One of the big worries for people is that the use of higher frequencies which are planned for future 5G installations ( already in the US ) have had no safety testing according to the US Telecom ’ s trade organisation CTIA .
Couple that with the evisceration of the Irish planning laws ( S.I .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ means that Telecom Operators can decide when and where the thousands of mini-cell antennae are placed not the local planners .
Your 5G hype tells us ….Aside from speed , 5G is being touted as infrastructure that may be necessary for new types of emergency healthcare and , eventually , autonomous vehicles .
This is partly due to its instantaneous connection capability , otherwise referred to as ‘ low latency ’ .
What you don ’ t tell us is that there is nothing wireless can do that fibre can not do in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You also fail to mention that “ Wireless broadband ” is more profitable for the operators .
So instead of supplying safe wired / fibre broadband to all our citizens , we hear from you that their profits are more important than citizens health .
When 5G is fully rolled out there will be hundreds of thousands of antennae in our homes , streets , factories , offices , schools and hospitals it will be impossible to escape this Untested 5G Weaponised Radiation .
The 5G hype is : It will deliver 1000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ movie in 1 to 2 seconds ) , 1000 times the data transfer , thanks to using the Higher Energy 5G Frequency spectrum ( Millimetre Waves ) .
Now take a moment and think about it !
Will the electricity usage be 1000 time higher ?
Or even just 100 times higher or even just 10 times higher ?
No-body in authority really knows at this moment .
5G promises 1000-time faster speeds because of the higher frequencies ( higher energy ) .
Unfortunately , this will come at a high cost in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Footprint .
Questions need to be asked on who is driving this 5G madness , who stands to benefit and who stands to lose .
The people of Ireland will definitely be the biggest losers , more EU fines , increasing Carbon Footprint meaning severe reductions in other vital areas that really need to use the carbon .
Paraphrasing what Susan Pockett says about New Zealand , can easily be extended into the Irish context .
See this .
Our DCCAE and Comreg are not presently credible sources of information .
On the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be firmly and unshakably committed to the ICNIRP thermal-only dogma , exactly because that dogma allows unbridled expansion of the wireless and telecommunications industries .
• It is time to stop believing ICNIRP spin .
Tissue heating is not the only biological effect of radiofrequency radiation .
The ICNIRP thermal-only exposure limit is not safe .
• Like tobacco smoke , low intensity radiofrequency radiation has multiple harmful effects on human health .
Unlike second-hand smoke , second-hand radiation is fast becoming inescapable .
The present situation is thus worse than the Big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop accepting biased reports from individuals with blatant conflicts of interest and start taking seriously the health and safety of their constituents ; or at least of their own children and grandchildren .
• The unchecked expansion of Big Wireless permitted by ICNIRP ’ s thermal-only guidelines is actively harmful to all biological inhabitants of planet Earth .
Further expansion to 5G technology will inevitably involve yet more radiation exposure .
The fact that this exposure will not breach the ludicrously high ICNIRP-based standard is no defence at all .
The people of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5G from our information sources such as the Press / TV / Web and not modulated hype and 30-year-old misinformation .
Note to readers : please click the share buttons above or below .
Forward this article to your email lists .
Crosspost on your blog site , internet forums .
etc .

By David Sullivan | Global Research
The Irish Government has consistently failed to meet its obligations from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe with Resolution 1815 in (2011), the Phone manufacturers are totally disingenuous, in that they bury the Warnings six deep in their T+C and an Oireachtas Bill No 24 of 2011, The Mobile Phone Radiation Warning Act 2011 which fell because of the government change was never followed up.
As result of this huge vacuum in reliable health and safety information, nobody in authority is telling our children and pregnant mothers about the dangers of their exposure to this ubiquitous sea of Pulsed Polarised Modulated Microwave Radiation.
It is respected technical journalists like you that need to reinforce and amplify these responsible warnings.
When you say the following in today’s article I would think that a huge number of Independent Scientists Worldwide will strongly disagree with your dated assertions.
“According to Ireland’s regulator, this type of radiation only has sufficient energy for “excitation” and can’t “break bonds that hold molecules in cells together”.
This is just 100% Wrong / Incorrect / Scientifically Not Correct / it is also a Disingenuous Lie and shame on Comreg for repeating and perpetuating a misconception of classical physics.
There are two main issues that confound and amplify the widespread misunderstandings that we are facing today. The first is a misassumption of Classical Physics in a Biological System, the famous “Non-Ionizing Radiation Story” and the second is the historical mistake of using a totally inappropriate “Thermal Effects Safety Guidelines” from ICNIRP to the assess safety of the mobile phone microwave radiation.
Physical science tells us that Non-Ionising Radiation (NIR) does not possess the energy to damage Chemical Covalent Bonds, so it could not damage DNA and is therefore perfectly safe!
This is part of the official disinformation that industry and regulators buy and sell.
The disinformation comes because Microwave Radiation energy is classified in the Electro-Magnetic Spectrum as a Non-Ionising Radiation (NIR) and by definition the energy of this radiation is not strong enough to ionise a molecule by breaking a covalent chemical bond.
The typical energy of a covalent bond is in the order of 1 electron–Volt (1 eV = 1.6 .10-19 Joules). The force required to break a covalent bond is in the order of 1 eV/0.1 nm ~ 1600 pN. (pico Newtons)
The energy in the microwave radiation is well below this level. At 3 GHz it is 1.8*10⁻²⁴Joules.
See this.
So, this is the science that lays out the impossibility of Microwave radiation being able to damage DNA because it is too weak in energy terms to rip the electrons off and break any of the bonds present in DNA. And this is the “rock-solid classical physics” that the whole disinformation story rests on.
So, most Engineers will spout out this story, almost as religious Dogma and poo-poo the whole idea of Microwaves causing any negative health effects.
The only problem with the story is the horrible fact that microwave radiation at the levels present in mobile phones does in fact damage DNA. Not expected, but sadly true. So, this is the reason why there is so much deliberate confusion, from an Engineering standpoint it is not going to happen, yet in Biology it happens!
This short reference summarises the science that attests to the reality that the biologists are correct. It is known as the 2004 EU Reflex Study and the following link gives a summary.
See this.
If you read the last paragraph of the article you will see the skulduggery the industry resorted to try to discredit this work.
This is the study that showed 24 hours of mobile phone radiation did the same amount of DNA damage as 60 CT Scans in or 250 years of The Earth’s background radiation.
How many people would voluntarily submit to 60 CT scans in 24 hours?
Science is getting better as time goes by and there are thousands of studies that back up the fact that NIR effects our biology and can in fact damage DNA. One theory of how this may happen is that NIR in living systems can create “Free Radicals” which in turn can damage DNA. But even if there is some debate as to the nature of the mechanisms that can cause the damage to occur, there is absolutely no debate that DNA damage does take place.
See this and this.
But Adrian don’t take my word for this, you have a simple choice, listen to compromised regulators in Comreg dishing out 30-year-old myths about Non-Ionising Radiation or just Google and see they don’t make any sense.
Try to Google (“Microwave Radiation” “DNA Damage”) you may see that there are approx. 53,300 hits on Google. Now that’s not bad for something that can’t happen!
And guess what there is even a field of Science called Bio-electromagnetics dedicated to this type of research with many tens of thousands of peer reviewed articles from Scientists all over the world that all working on something COMREG says can’t happen.
However even with science on the side of the Biologists, being right is not enough to upset the whole NIR house of cards story that is supported by a multi trillion-euro global business.
Thermal Based Standards Irish (cut and paste) ICNIRP guidelines are not a measure of the damage the radiation may be doing to our bodies they are simply a measure of the amount of heat absorbed by a body. The ICNIRP thermal-only exposure limit is not safe.
Microwave Radiation Affects our Biology, it has an effect which varies between people but it does have deleterious effects on all life forms.
There are many well documented Bio-effects on our health and well-being, related to mobile phone and wireless technology. Bioeffects are clearly established and occur even at very low levels of exposure to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation.
Just look at these two web sites which are up to date (2019) with the latest information on these Bioeffects.
See this and this.
Evidence for fertility and reproduction effects: Human sperm and DNA damaged
Foetal and Neonatal effects of EMF
EMF is a plausible biological mechanism for autism (ASD)
The opening up of the Blood Brain Barrier
Epidemiology studies consistently show elevations in risk of Brain Cancers
Evidence for Genetic Effects.
Evidence for Childhood Cancers (Leukaemia)
Significant disruption of our Voltage Gated Calcium Channels (VGCC)
Decreased Melatonin levels, Breast Cancer and Alzheimer’s
If you want to learn more about the 8 Bioeffects caused by exposure to RF please read Prof Martin Pall’s 91-page review article (or even just read the two-page summary) here.
The work that Martin Pall has highlighted on VGCC’s and the very simple lab experiments showing direct effect of RF on live cells in a flask with an electrode measuring the reactive nitrogen species when exposed to RF are so clear, RF at the levels present in mobile phones rapidly releases oxidative species.
Every living entity is different and will react differently to external and internal EMF stimuli.
We know that RF has biological effects what we don’t know well enough are the consequences for living creatures.
I have tried to convey to you the complexity of the effects of EMF’s on living creatures, we are only beginning to see a little of what goes on at the molecular and cellular levels.
With respect your reporting on 5G is incomplete.
At present the five Irish operations have purchased spectrum only in the 600 MHz to 3.6 GHz frequencies. These are similar type of frequencies being used in LTE 4G. One of the big worries for people is that the use of higher frequencies which are planned for future 5G installations (already in the US) have had no safety testing according to the US Telecom’s trade organisation CTIA.
Couple that with the evisceration of the Irish planning laws (S.I. No. 31 of 2018) which means that Telecom Operators can decide when and where the thousands of mini-cell antennae are placed not the local planners.
Your 5G hype tells us ….Aside from speed, 5G is being touted as infrastructure that may be necessary for new types of emergency healthcare and, eventually, autonomous vehicles. This is partly due to its instantaneous connection capability, otherwise referred to as ‘low latency’.
What you don’t tell us is that there is nothing wireless can do that fibre cannot do in terms of speed or low latency.
You also fail to mention that “Wireless broadband” is more profitable for the operators. So instead of supplying safe wired / fibre broadband to all our citizens, we hear from you that their profits are more important than citizens health.
When 5G is fully rolled out there will be hundreds of thousands of antennae in our homes, streets, factories, offices, schools and hospitals it will be impossible to escape this Untested 5G Weaponised Radiation.
The 5G hype is: It will deliver 1000 times the download speed (full length movie in 1 to 2 seconds), 1000 times the data transfer, thanks to using the Higher Energy 5G Frequency spectrum (Millimetre Waves).
Now take a moment and think about it ! Will the electricity usage be 1000 time higher ? Or even just 100 times higher or even just 10 times higher ? No-body in authority really knows at this moment.
5G promises 1000-time faster speeds because of the higher frequencies (higher energy). Unfortunately, this will come at a high cost in electrical energy usage and the corresponding Carbon Footprint.
See this.
Questions need to be asked on who is driving this 5G madness, who stands to benefit and who stands to lose. The people of Ireland will definitely be the biggest losers, more EU fines, increasing Carbon Footprint meaning severe reductions in other vital areas that really need to use the carbon.
Paraphrasing what Susan Pockett says about New Zealand, can easily be extended into the Irish context. See this.
Our DCCAE and Comreg are not presently credible sources of information. On the contrary, these government department appears to be firmly and unshakably committed to the ICNIRP thermal-only dogma, exactly because that dogma allows unbridled expansion of the wireless and telecommunications industries.
It is time to stop believing ICNIRP spin. Tissue heating is not the only biological effect of radiofrequency radiation. The ICNIRP thermal-only exposure limit is not safe.
Like tobacco smoke, low intensity radiofrequency radiation has multiple harmful effects on human health. Unlike second-hand smoke, second-hand radiation is fast becoming inescapable. The present situation is thus worse than the Big Tobacco story.
Elected politicians should stop accepting biased reports from individuals with blatant conflicts of interest and start taking seriously the health and safety of their constituents; or at least of their own children and grandchildren.
The unchecked expansion of Big Wireless permitted by ICNIRP’s thermal-only guidelines is actively harmful to all biological inhabitants of planet Earth. Further expansion to 5G technology will inevitably involve yet more radiation exposure. The fact that this exposure will not breach the ludicrously high ICNIRP-based standard is no defence at all.
The people of Ireland deserve to hear the truth about 5G from our information sources such as the Press / TV / Web and not modulated hype and 30-year-old misinformation.
Thank you,
David Sullivan
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-29--Coronavirus highlights the $35 billion vaccine market. Here are the key players

The coronavirus outbreak is bringing attention to the fast-growing vaccine industry .
The vaccine market has grown sixfold over the past two decades , worth more than $ 35 billion today , according to AB Bernstein .
The firm said the industry has consolidated to four big players that account for about 85 % of the market — British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline , French pharmaceutical company Sanofi , and U.S.-based Merck and Pfizer .
“ For every dollar invested in vaccination in the world ’ s 94 lowest-income countries , the net return is $ 44 .
Hard to argue against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s analyst , said in a note .
“ This oligopoly has been built through significant market consolidation driven primarily by the complexities of the manufacturing and supply chain.
” These companies have jumped into the race to combat the deadly coronavirus , working on vaccine or drug programs .
Investors have been flocking to some biotech names amid market volatility in hopes that their initiatives to develop treatment and prevention for the coronavirus could come to fruition at some point .
Sanofi is teaming up with the U.S. government to develop a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its work on the 2003 SARS outbreak could speed up the process .
GlaxoSmithKline said this month it is partnering with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations for a vaccine program .
Still , any commercial treatment for the coronavirus could be years away .
Experts have warned despite recent advances , the public shouldn ’ t expect a coronavirus vaccine to hit the market until early next year .
The Bernstein analyst said Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline both have a stable vaccine portfolio , including shingles , flu , pertussis and polio vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Merck ’ s vaccine business generated $ 8.4 billion of revenues in 2019 , the segment has been growing at an annual rate of 9 % since 2010 , according to Bernstein .
Its human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil 9 will be “ the biggest selling vaccine of all time , ” Kapadia said .
“ Gardasil 9 will take over the HPV market given competition is limited – supply is the only decelerator.
” For Pfizer , while its vaccine business has stagnated in recent years , its pipeline has “ blockbuster potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaccines are long-lived assets , have high barriers to entry , typically stable/growing pricing , mostly limited competition and no patent cliff , ” Kapadia said .
To be sure , while vaccine companies can see periods of high growth , real innovation is needed to be long-standing winners in a market that requires major capital and faces cheaper alternatives from emerging markets , the analyst cautioned .
Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis , and live business day programming from around the world .

By Yun Li
The coronavirus outbreak is bringing attention to the fast-growing vaccine industry.
The vaccine market has grown sixfold over the past two decades, worth more than $35 billion today, according to AB Bernstein. The firm said the industry has consolidated to four big players that account for about 85% of the market — British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline, French pharmaceutical company Sanofi, and U.S.-based Merck and Pfizer.
“For every dollar invested in vaccination in the world’s 94 lowest-income countries, the net return is $44. Hard to argue against,” Wimal Kapadia, Bernstein’s analyst, said in a note. “This oligopoly has been built through significant market consolidation driven primarily by the complexities of the manufacturing and supply chain.”
These companies have jumped into the race to combat the deadly coronavirus, working on vaccine or drug programs. Investors have been flocking to some biotech names amid market volatility in hopes that their initiatives to develop treatment and prevention for the coronavirus could come to fruition at some point. Sanofi is teaming up with the U.S. government to develop a vaccine for the new virus, hoping its work on the 2003 SARS outbreak could speed up the process. GlaxoSmithKline said this month it is partnering with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations for a vaccine program. Still, any commercial treatment for the coronavirus could be years away. Experts have warned despite recent advances, the public shouldn’t expect a coronavirus vaccine to hit the market until early next year. The Bernstein analyst said Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline both have a stable vaccine portfolio, including shingles, flu, pertussis and polio vaccines, that will keep driving revenue. ‘Long-lived assets’


australiannationalreview--2020-04-29--Americans are activating as their religious and parental rights are being placed on the government c

Americans are activating as their religious and parental rights are being placed on the government chopping block

Something incredible is happening in America .
A grassroots movement which has patiently , but inexorably , developed for decades has burst through to the mainstream .
Its growth can no longer be ignored by Big Pharma-controlled media , as concerned citizens now regularly crowd state capitols .
First , in late December and then again early January , the nation watched as New Jersey ’ s state capitol was twice occupied by parents and families battling against a pair of aggressive , Constitution-cancelling pieces of legislation .
All New Jersey bills eventually died , succumbing to The People ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The capitol guard estimated close to five thousand people were present on the final day of protest , however local media reported the figure was only hundreds .
Last week , a similar flavor of grassroots activism took place at Connecticut ’ s Legislative Office Building .
Once again , like in New Jersey , citizens protested a bill that would remove religious exemptions to vaccination , while creating a government infrastructure to limit medical exemptions .
Again , corporate and local media reporting tried to downplay the impact , claiming only hundreds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Connecticut tweeted the number was more likely 2,300 .
More than 3,000 pieces of written testimony were submitted in Connecticut , while spoken testimonies lasted for more than 22 hours .
Much like in New Jersey , parents and families waited patiently to tell their stories and state their opinions .
Meanwhile , representatives from the American Academy of Pediatrics ( AAP ) were given priority , securing spots in the front of the line to give early testimony .
The CT Freedom Alliance said in a statement : No vote was taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with protests , planned for Monday .
Speaking out against the bill , Maine Rep. Heidi Sampson addressed the House , reminding fellow legislators that “ the Constitution is designed to protect the minority .
How dare we strip these people of their rights ?
” On March 3 , Maine voters across the state will have the opportunity to vote on the statewide referendum question : whether or not to reject the new law that removes religious and philosophical exemptions to immunizations .
Desperate attempts from government representatives to medical ‘ officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporters , have falsely painted the current climate as a bunch of ‘ anti-vaxers ’ arguing about ‘ settled science.
’ But their empty claims are increasingly falling on deaf ears .
According to new data used from surveys at Emory University from 15,059 children nationwide , One-third of children between the ages of 19-35 months limited the number of shots per visit , skipped at least one vaccine or were not compliant with guideline recommendations .
Before 2020 , the talking point was ‘ the debate is over ’ on vaccines .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken place .
The modern town squares of social media platforms are working to strangle open conversation about the many inconvenient truths of these untested pharmaceutical products .
Meanwhile , researchers and scientists continue to discover concerning issues for the one-size-fits-all vaccine industry .
In addition , the amount of pro-family , pro-choice vaccine legislation currently moving forward stands as another striking example that there is massive debate raging .
The vaccine injury deniers , in whatever form they appear , continue to move the goal post in a militarist ‘ mission creep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rush to trample religious rights and medical exemptions , and coercing vaccines through the education system , the role of a parent has become a prime target as well .
Removing the ‘ parent barrier , ’ the last remaining stopgap measure between notoriously greedy and predatory pharmaceutical companies , is being written into state legislation .
New Jersey , Washington D.C. , Illinois , Maryland , Colorado , Missouri , New York , and Wisconsin all have active bills allowing minors to consent to vaccination without parental consent , and often without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaccine Information Center ( NVIC ) submitted written testimony in the case of D.C. ’ s bill .
Some points of NVIC ’ s testimony included : Will a minor child who consents to vaccination know that they will be waiving their constitutional right to a trial by jury should they become injured ?
Will they understand the 3-year statute of limitations on finding legal representation and filing a vaccine injury claim with the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ?
Running parallel to the slew of bills attempting to remove parental and other barriers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , several states have stepped up to protect the medical , religious , and parental rights of its citizens .
A shining example is South Dakota , which is aiming to make it a Class 1 misdemeanor for “ any educational institution , medical provider , or person to compel another to submit to immunization , ” according to a new bill ’ s text .
The bill adds : “ No child entering public or nonpublic school , or a public or nonpublic early childhood program in this state , may be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ procedure for enrollment or entry…No school may use any coercive means to require immunization.
” South Dakota ’ s bill declares , “ Every person has the inalienable right to bodily integrity , free from any threat or compulsion that the person accepts any medical intervention , including immunization .
No person may be discriminated against for refusal to accept an unwanted medical intervention , including immunization.
” How 2020 shakes out is being determined now .
It ’ s happening in nearly every state capital , in real time .
What is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ endless propaganda from multiple corporate , governmental and medical mouthpieces , is that the science is far from settled .
The debate isn ’ t over—in fact , it may just finally be getting started .
What are you doing to continue the conversation ?

By Jefferey Jaxen
Something incredible is happening in America.
A grassroots movement which has patiently, but inexorably, developed for decades has burst through to the mainstream. Its growth can no longer be ignored by Big Pharma-controlled media, as concerned citizens now regularly crowd state capitols.
First, in late December and then again early January, the nation watched as New Jersey’s state capitol was twice occupied by parents and families battling against a pair of aggressive, Constitution-cancelling pieces of legislation.
All New Jersey bills eventually died, succumbing to The People’s solidarity in defying government overreach. The capitol guard estimated close to five thousand people were present on the final day of protest, however local media reported the figure was only hundreds.
Last week, a similar flavor of grassroots activism took place at Connecticut’s Legislative Office Building. Once again, like in New Jersey, citizens protested a bill that would remove religious exemptions to vaccination, while creating a government infrastructure to limit medical exemptions.
Again, corporate and local media reporting tried to downplay the impact, claiming only hundreds of protestors showed up. Informed Choice Connecticut tweeted the number was more likely 2,300.
More than 3,000 pieces of written testimony were submitted in Connecticut, while spoken testimonies lasted for more than 22 hours. Much like in New Jersey, parents and families waited patiently to tell their stories and state their opinions. Meanwhile, representatives from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) were given priority, securing spots in the front of the line to give early testimony.
The CT Freedom Alliance said in a statement:
“…[T]his legislation would obliterate the religious liberties of hundreds of thousands of CT schoolchildren, while simultaneously mandating the Department of Public Health to release confidential immunization information for every public and private school student in the state,”
No vote was taken that day. Hearings will resume, with protests, planned for Monday.
“During public hearings in the spring of 2019 on LD798, testimony was received by 781 citizens and organizations. State House and Senate committees listened to more than 13 hours of testimony from nearly 200 people, 80 percent of whom opposed the bill.”
Speaking out against the bill, Maine Rep. Heidi Sampson addressed the House, reminding fellow legislators that “the Constitution is designed to protect the minority. How dare we strip these people of their rights?”
Rep. Sampson went on: “I want to be clear. The people will not go away quietly. We as a body have done them a huge disservice. They have been mocked, ridiculed, disenfranchised, dismissed, insulted, ignored, set up for ambush, bullied and stigmatized.”
On March 3, Maine voters across the state will have the opportunity to vote on the statewide referendum question: whether or not to reject the new law that removes religious and philosophical exemptions to immunizations.
Desperate attempts from government representatives to medical ‘officials,’ from regulatory bodies to media reporters, have falsely painted the current climate as a bunch of ‘anti-vaxers’ arguing about ‘settled science.’ But their empty claims are increasingly falling on deaf ears.
According to new data used from surveys at Emory University from 15,059 children nationwide, One-third of children between the ages of 19-35 months limited the number of shots per visit, skipped at least one vaccine or were not compliant with guideline recommendations.
Before 2020, the talking point was ‘the debate is over’ on vaccines. Yet rarely has a true debate ever taken place. The modern town squares of social media platforms are working to strangle open conversation about the many inconvenient truths of these untested pharmaceutical products.
Meanwhile, researchers and scientists continue to discover concerning issues for the one-size-fits-all vaccine industry. In addition, the amount of pro-family, pro-choice vaccine legislation currently moving forward stands as another striking example that there is massive debate raging.
The vaccine injury deniers, in whatever form they appear, continue to move the goal post in a militarist ‘mission creep’ operation. But in their mad rush to trample religious rights and medical exemptions, and coercing vaccines through the education system, the role of a parent has become a prime target as well.
Removing the ‘parent barrier,’ the last remaining stopgap measure between notoriously greedy and predatory pharmaceutical companies, is being written into state legislation.
New Jersey, Washington D.C., Illinois, Maryland, Colorado, Missouri, New York, and Wisconsin all have active bills allowing minors to consent to vaccination without parental consent, and often without parent’s knowledge.
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) submitted written testimony in the case of D.C.’s bill. Some points of NVIC’s testimony included:
“[The D.C. regulation] places vaccines in a special category to allow legally unaccountable individuals to persuade a minor child to get vaccinated without the knowledge or consent of the parent….Minor children may not be aware of a family or their own personal history of vaccine reactions or personal contraindications to relay to the vaccine administrator.
Will a minor child who consents to vaccination know that they will be waiving their constitutional right to a trial by jury should they become injured? Will they understand the 3-year statute of limitations on finding legal representation and filing a vaccine injury claim with the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program?
Running parallel to the slew of bills attempting to remove parental and other barriers to Big Pharma’s medical products, several states have stepped up to protect the medical, religious, and parental rights of its citizens. A shining example is South Dakota, which is aiming to make it a Class 1 misdemeanor for “any educational institution, medical provider, or person to compel another to submit to immunization,” according to a new bill’s text.
The bill adds: “No child entering public or nonpublic school, or a public or nonpublic early childhood program in this state, may be required to receive any immunization or medical procedure for enrollment or entry…No school may use any coercive means to require immunization.”
The Tenth Amendment Center writes:
“Mandating vaccinations is a dangerous slippery slope that violates the right to informed consent. This legislation would firmly push back against this threat to medical freedom.”
South Dakota’s bill declares, “Every person has the inalienable right to bodily integrity, free from any threat or compulsion that the person accepts any medical intervention, including immunization. No person may be discriminated against for refusal to accept an unwanted medical intervention, including immunization.”
How 2020 shakes out is being determined now. It’s happening in nearly every state capital, in real time. What is clear now, despite the years of endless propaganda from multiple corporate, governmental and medical mouthpieces, is that the science is far from settled. The debate isn’t over—in fact, it may just finally be getting started.
What are you doing to continue the conversation?


australiannationalreview--2020-04-29--Metro area residents may take pass on coronavirus vaccine, poll finds

Nearly half of metro area residents are unsure or would not take a vaccine to combat the spread of the coronavirus if one became available , according to a new poll commissioned by Mount Sinai South Nassau hospital in Oceanside .
The poll , which will be released Wednesday , indicates that Long Island and New York City residents are less likely to travel , use mass transportation or attend large gatherings because of the coronavirus , which has sickened more than 80,000 people across the globe and killed more than 2,700 people , primarily in China .
But although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ received a flu shot this season , only 55 % would become immunized for coronavirus — also known as COVID-19 — if a vaccine became available .
Meanwhile , 14 % said they would not take the vaccine and 31 % said they were unsure .
Dr. Aaron Glatt , chairman of medicine and of infectious diseases at Mount Sinai South Nassau hospital , said the data could reflect an increased reluctance among the “ anti-vaxxer ” community to become immunized against a virus that had quickly spread across Asia and Europe .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be higher , ” Glatt said .
“ It is concerning that more people are not jumping to take the vaccine.
” Overall , women , young people and city residents said they would be more likely to take the vaccine while men , older respondents and Long Islanders expressed greater reluctance , the poll shows .
Although pharmaceutical companies are working at breakneck speed to develop a vaccine to stop the spread of the virus , congressional lawmakers said Tuesday that a vaccine may not be available for 12 to 18 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Disease Control and Prevention , there are 35 confirmed coronavirus cases nationwide but none in New York State .
The poll , commissioned in early February , asked 600 residents — including 150 from Nassau and Suffolk — how concerned they were about coronavirus and influenza .
* 62 % of respondents have high , or very high concerns , about coronavirus , with 54 % saying they are worried about it affecting their family ; * Half of all respondents are confident that federal and state governments are prepared to deal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disagreed and 14 % were unsure ; * More than 70 % of respondents are less likely to travel overseas ; 48 % less likely to use mass transit and 46 % less willing to attend large gatherings because of coronavirus .
Meanwhile , only 51 % of respondents said they had high or very high concerns about the flu .
The CDC estimates there have been at least 29 million influenza illnesses so far this season with 16,000 deaths , including 105 children .

By Robert Brodsky
Nearly half of metro area residents are unsure or would not take a vaccine to combat the spread of the coronavirus if one became available, according to a new poll commissioned by Mount Sinai South Nassau hospital in Oceanside.
The poll, which will be released Wednesday, indicates that Long Island and New York City residents are less likely to travel, use mass transportation or attend large gatherings because of the coronavirus, which has sickened more than 80,000 people across the globe and killed more than 2,700 people, primarily in China.
But although three in four respondents said they had received a flu shot this season, only 55% would become immunized for coronavirus — also known as COVID-19 — if a vaccine became available. Meanwhile, 14% said they would not take the vaccine and 31% said they were unsure.
Dr. Aaron Glatt, chairman of medicine and of infectious diseases at Mount Sinai South Nassau hospital, said the data could reflect an increased reluctance among the “anti-vaxxer” community to become immunized against a virus that had quickly spread across Asia and Europe.
“I would have expected the number to be higher,” Glatt said. “It is concerning that more people are not jumping to take the vaccine.”
Overall, women, young people and city residents said they would be more likely to take the vaccine while men, older respondents and Long Islanders expressed greater reluctance, the poll shows.
Although pharmaceutical companies are working at breakneck speed to develop a vaccine to stop the spread of the virus, congressional lawmakers said Tuesday that a vaccine may not be available for 12 to 18 months.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are 35 confirmed coronavirus cases nationwide but none in New York State.
The poll, commissioned in early February, asked 600 residents — including 150 from Nassau and Suffolk — how concerned they were about coronavirus and influenza.
It found that:
* 62% of respondents have high, or very high concerns, about coronavirus, with 54% saying they are worried about it affecting their family;
* Half of all respondents are confident that federal and state governments are prepared to deal with the outbreak, while 36% disagreed and 14% were unsure;
* More than 70% of respondents are less likely to travel overseas; 48% less likely to use mass transit and 46% less willing to attend large gatherings because of coronavirus.
Meanwhile, only 51% of respondents said they had high or very high concerns about the flu. The CDC estimates there have been at least 29 million influenza illnesses so far this season with 16,000 deaths, including 105 children.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-30--Anti-vaxxers downplay ‘common cold’-like coronavirus amid fears of forced vaccinations

An anti-vaccination group has suggested the deadly coronavirus “ is just the common cold ” , and people have been “ fooled ” by a “ fear campaign on the silly sheep media ” .
The statement , in a Facebook video by the Australian Vaccination-risks Network , comes after Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Friday moved Australia into pandemic mode , declaring the government was now activating its emergency plan .
The viral outbreak that began in China has now infected more than 86,000 people in 60 countries , killing 3000 .
As the global impact of the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anti-vaxxers on social media .
The Australian Vaccination-risks Network is one group which has moved to downplay the significance of coronavirus , with spokeswoman Meryl Dorey saying the virus “ is just the common cold ” .
“ The cold can kill anyone if they ’ re sick to begin with and coronavirus is no different , ” she said on a Facebook video on Sunday .
She said people have been “ fooled ” by a “ fear campaign on the silly sheep media ” .
Prominent anti-vaxxer group People for Informed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ followers that “ there is nothing to worry about ” , also suggesting people awaiting a vaccine are a herd of sheep .
And Australian anti-vaxxer Taylor Winterstein has told her 33,500 Instagram followers that “ they ’ re already socially programming us to accept mass vaccination for when the time comes ” .
Australian scientists are among those developing a vaccine for the virus .
University of Queensland researchers said last week they were reaching a point where they could test a candidate vaccine on animals after determining the genetic sequence of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protein the same as what is on the surface of the virus .
Australia has recorded 29 infections , including 78-year-old Perth man James Kwan , who died on the weekend after contracting the virus on the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan .
He was the first Australian to die from the disease .
On Monday , the nation ’ s chief medical officer conceded Australia could no longer keep new coronavirus cases out of the country .
“ It is no longer possible to absolutely prevent new cases coming in , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country , ” Professor Brendan Murphy told reporters .
Last week , a US biotech firm sent an experimental coronavirus vaccine to US government researchers just six weeks after it started working it .
Initial trials of the potential vaccine could begin in April , but the process of testing and approvals would last at least a year .

An anti-vaccination group has suggested the deadly coronavirus “is just the common cold”, and people have been “fooled” by a “fear campaign on the silly sheep media”.
The statement, in a Facebook video by the Australian Vaccination-risks Network, comes after Prime Minister Scott Morrison on Friday moved Australia into pandemic mode, declaring the government was now activating its emergency plan.
The viral outbreak that began in China has now infected more than 86,000 people in 60 countries, killing 3000.
As the global impact of the virus escalates, so does the rhetoric from anti-vaxxers on social media.
The Australian Vaccination-risks Network is one group which has moved to downplay the significance of coronavirus, with spokeswoman Meryl Dorey saying the virus “is just the common cold”.
“The cold can kill anyone if they’re sick to begin with and coronavirus is no different,” she said on a Facebook video on Sunday.
She said people have been “fooled” by a “fear campaign on the silly sheep media”.
Prominent anti-vaxxer group People for Informed Consent Australia has claimed to its Facebook followers that “there is nothing to worry about”, also suggesting people awaiting a vaccine are a herd of sheep.
And Australian anti-vaxxer Taylor Winterstein has told her 33,500 Instagram followers that “they’re already socially programming us to accept mass vaccination for when the time comes”.
Australian scientists are among those developing a vaccine for the virus.
University of Queensland researchers said last week they were reaching a point where they could test a candidate vaccine on animals after determining the genetic sequence of coronavirus and using it to produce a protein the same as what is on the surface of the virus.
Australia has recorded 29 infections, including 78-year-old Perth man James Kwan, who died on the weekend after contracting the virus on the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan.
He was the first Australian to die from the disease.
On Monday, the nation’s chief medical officer conceded Australia could no longer keep new coronavirus cases out of the country.
“It is no longer possible to absolutely prevent new cases coming in, given the increasing changes in epidemiology around the country,” Professor Brendan Murphy told reporters.
Last week, a US biotech firm sent an experimental coronavirus vaccine to US government researchers just six weeks after it started working it.
Initial trials of the potential vaccine could begin in April, but the process of testing and approvals would last at least a year.


australiannationalreview--2020-04-30--New Study Finds HPV Vaccine Increased Serious Nervous System Disorders, General Harms

A new study published in the open access Systematic Reviews journal titled Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus ( HPV ) vaccines : systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports attempts to tackle the controversial vaccine .
Using clinical study reports obtained from the European Medicines Agency ( EMA ) and GlaxoSmithKline from 2014 to 2017 , study authors Lars Jørgensen , Peter Gøtzsche and Tom Jefferson set forth to assess the benefits and harms of the HPV vaccine .
The researchers looked at twenty-four of 50 eligible clinical study reports containing 58,412 pages of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 95,670 participants : 79,102 females and 16,568 males age 8–72 .
The newly published research from Gøtzsche and co-authors found more of the same shoddy research behavior reporting : The evidence and data analyzed in the clinical studies led the researchers to conclude : This new study is not the first scientific evidence or voices to question the HPV vaccine .
An entire book has been written on the controversy , incomplete science and evidence of harms associated with the vaccine since its inception .
The book , The HPV Vaccine On Trial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , gives balance and deeper insight to the often tightly controlled , overly optimistic and one-sided discussion allowed by much of the media and the medical community regarding the vaccine ’ s safety .
While proponents of the vaccine have claimed it safe and effective , critics of the HPV vaccine have pointed to incomplete , unscientific and simply fraudulent trial study designs used to obtain licensing for the shots .
For example , in Merck ’ s 2006 pre-licensure study for its Gardasil vaccine injected its “ placebo ” group of nearly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sulfate ( AAHS ) – a known neurotoxin which has no therapeutic benefit .
The AAHS-injected group was later combined with the true placebo group [ 320 girls ] , one of the only ones in all pre-licensure vaccine studies comprising the CDC ’ s recommended schedule , to create a “ control group ” for the purpose of masking serious safety issues with Gardasil that should have prevented its licensure .
During a 2018 Cochrane review which extolled the HPV vaccine , all 26 trials used in its analysis were found to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or hepatitis vaccines—rather than genuine inert placebos .
Cochrane ’ s HPV review was quickly taken apart in a critique published in BMJ Journals pointing out evidence that it was influenced by reporting bias , biased trial designs and failing to identify trial limitations .
Wherever government-sanctioned HPV vaccination campaigns are activated around the world , associated harms , labeled and dismissed as anecdotal evidence , have followed .
Countless parents and their teenage sons and daughters globally have told the same stories and displayed the same life shattering symptoms , often in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , from the HPV shot only to be ridiculed and ignored by those in positions to help .
Recently , the World Health Organization signaled to the medical community and general public that it would be taking a stance to label all vaccine injury psychosomatic – in other words , any severe adverse reaction experienced is all in the person ’ s head .
It is perhaps the first time in modern history a regulatory heath body has decided to render a large , growing pool of individuals invisible by victim-blaming their injuries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the recent effort from Jørgensen , Gøtzsche and Jefferson are desperately needed to bring balance to a conversation about harms , systemically and institutionally ignored , from a shot that is rapidly expanding into all age and gender groups .
Furthermore , in the U.S. , massive legislative efforts are being attempted to race the HPV vaccine into the bodies of American children without parental consent or knowledge – in those as young as 9-years-old in many instances .
With the precautionary principle left behind years ago , a wayward medical community , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they draft abusive legislation to remove the ‘ barrier ’ parent , is attempting to enact a mandatory market for Big Pharma ’ s highly lucrative and injectable product lines on the backs of American families .
Record numbers of protests and pushback is happening in real time at capitol buildings across the country in strong opposition to all forms of legislation written to remove the impediments to vaccine-related profits margins .
Meanwhile , courageous voices from the scientific and medical communities are now regularly publishing research and speaking out on the side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific discovery .

By Jefferey Jaxen | The Highwire
A new study published in the open access Systematic Reviews journal titled Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports attempts to tackle the controversial vaccine.
Using clinical study reports obtained from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and GlaxoSmithKline from 2014 to 2017, study authors Lars Jørgensen, Peter Gøtzsche and Tom Jefferson set forth to assess the benefits and harms of the HPV vaccine.
The researchers looked at twenty-four of 50 eligible clinical study reports containing 58,412 pages of 22 trials and 2 follow-up studies including 95,670 participants: 79,102 females and 16,568 males age 8–72.
The newly published research from Gøtzsche and co-authors found more of the same shoddy research behavior reporting:
“Serious harms were incompletely reported for 72% of participants. Nearly all control participants received active comparators. No clinical study report included complete case report forms.”
Furthermore, the researchers found:
“the HPV vaccines increased serious nervous system disorders and general harms.”
The evidence and data analyzed in the clinical studies led the researchers to conclude:
“At 4 years follow-up, the HPV vaccines decreased HPV-related cancer precursors and treatment procedures but increased serious nervous system disorders and general harms. As the included trials were primarily designed to assess benefits and were not adequately designed to assess harms, the extent to which the HPV vaccines’ benefits outweigh their harms is unclear. Limited access to clinical study reports and trial data with case report forms prevented a thorough assessment.”
This new study is not the first scientific evidence or voices to question the HPV vaccine. An entire book has been written on the controversy, incomplete science and evidence of harms associated with the vaccine since its inception. The book, The HPV Vaccine On Trial: Seeking Justice For A Generation Betrayed, gives balance and deeper insight to the often tightly controlled, overly optimistic and one-sided discussion allowed by much of the media and the medical community regarding the vaccine’s safety.
While proponents of the vaccine have claimed it safe and effective, critics of the HPV vaccine have pointed to incomplete, unscientific and simply fraudulent trial study designs used to obtain licensing for the shots.
For example, in Merck’s 2006 pre-licensure study for its Gardasil vaccine injected its “placebo” group of nearly 10,000 healthy girls with Amorphous Aluminum Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate (AAHS) – a known neurotoxin which has no therapeutic benefit. The AAHS-injected group was later combined with the true placebo group [320 girls], one of the only ones in all pre-licensure vaccine studies comprising the CDC’s recommended schedule, to create a “control group” for the purpose of masking serious safety issues with Gardasil that should have prevented its licensure.
During a 2018 Cochrane review which extolled the HPV vaccine, all 26 trials used in its analysis were found to have used active comparators—either various aluminum adjuvants or hepatitis vaccines—rather than genuine inert placebos. Cochrane’s HPV review was quickly taken apart in a critique published in BMJ Journals pointing out evidence that it was influenced by reporting bias, biased trial designs and failing to identify trial limitations.
Wherever government-sanctioned HPV vaccination campaigns are activated around the world, associated harms, labeled and dismissed as anecdotal evidence, have followed. Countless parents and their teenage sons and daughters globally have told the same stories and displayed the same life shattering symptoms, often in the form of serious nervous system disorders, from the HPV shot only to be ridiculed and ignored by those in positions to help.
Recently, the World Health Organization signaled to the medical community and general public that it would be taking a stance to label all vaccine injury psychosomatic – in other words, any severe adverse reaction experienced is all in the person’s head. It is perhaps the first time in modern history a regulatory heath body has decided to render a large, growing pool of individuals invisible by victim-blaming their injuries and invaliding their suffering.
Studies like the recent effort from Jørgensen, Gøtzsche and Jefferson are desperately needed to bring balance to a conversation about harms, systemically and institutionally ignored, from a shot that is rapidly expanding into all age and gender groups.
Furthermore, in the U.S., massive legislative efforts are being attempted to race the HPV vaccine into the bodies of American children without parental consent or knowledge – in those as young as 9-years-old in many instances.
With the precautionary principle left behind years ago, a wayward medical community, whispering into the ears of politicians as they draft abusive legislation to remove the ‘barrier’ parent, is attempting to enact a mandatory market for Big Pharma’s highly lucrative and injectable product lines on the backs of American families. Record numbers of protests and pushback is happening in real time at capitol buildings across the country in strong opposition to all forms of legislation written to remove the impediments to vaccine-related profits margins. Meanwhile, courageous voices from the scientific and medical communities are now regularly publishing research and speaking out on the side of transparency, informed consent and true scientific discovery.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-02--Health Workers Law | Victorians For Vaccine Choice

In a shocking move , the Andrews Government announced a new bill on February 19 2020 to introduce mandatory vaccination for all frontline health workers and other workers in the health system .
“ Our new laws will mean healthcare workers must be fully immunized to protect themselves and patients against the flu each year , as well as whooping cough , measles , chicken pox and hepatitis B.
” By the looks of the bill , any other vaccines , such as Hepatitis A and TB , could be added to this list .
And the bill would apply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hospitals and aged-care facilities .
Many health workers affected do not know about this bill , or don ’ t know what they can do about it – please print off the following letter and hand out to health workers wherever you can , such as in hospitals and medical centres and their carparks .
If you would like to alter it for some reason you can copy and paste the text into your text editor and edit away .
Download letter ( PDF ) We need as many people as possible to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ house ( Legislative Assembly ) and upper house ( Legislative Council ) , and to arrange meetings with your own representatives , to express your concerns .
Find a list of Victorian MPs below ( we suggest you set the page to see 100 entries ) : https : //www.parliament.vic.gov.au/about/people-in-parliament/members-search/list-all-members To find your electorate enter your suburb and postcode into the following page – District means lower house and Region means upper house .
You can also use an interactive map from this page .
https : //www.parliament.vic.gov.au/about/electorates Once you know your District @ @ @ @ @ @ @ MPs – you can use google for this .
Find an example email on the following page on this website : Health Workers Law Emails Please do change it to make it your own , politicians tend to ignore template emails .
For talking points , see the example email and you will find ideas and links to studies on the following page on the AVN website : https : //avn.org.au/information/list-mps-senators-lobbying/ The bill consists of amendments to established Acts , and is described as : View all information about the bill on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amendment ( Mandatory Vaccination of Healthcare Workers ) Bill 2020 Two PDFs are available for download , both are fairly short – you can download them from the above page or from this website , below :

Health Services Amendment (Mandatory Vaccination of Healthcare Workers) Bill 2020
In a shocking move, the Andrews Government announced a new bill on February 19 2020 to introduce mandatory vaccination for all frontline health workers and other workers in the health system.
“Our new laws will mean healthcare workers must be fully immunized to protect themselves and patients against the flu each year, as well as whooping cough, measles, chicken pox and hepatitis B.”
By the looks of the bill, any other vaccines, such as Hepatitis A and TB, could be added to this list. And the bill would apply to ancillary staff such as cleaners in hospitals and aged-care facilities.
Read the press release here:
Making Vaccination Mandatory For Healthcare Workers
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/making-vaccination-mandatory-for-healthcare-workers/
Action needed
Many health workers affected do not know about this bill, or don’t know what they can do about it – please print off the following letter and hand out to health workers wherever you can, such as in hospitals and medical centres and their carparks. If you would like to alter it for some reason you can copy and paste the text into your text editor and edit away.
Download letter (PDF)
We need as many people as possible to email all Victorian MPs, both lower house (Legislative Assembly) and upper house (Legislative Council), and to arrange meetings with your own representatives, to express your concerns. Find a list of Victorian MPs below (we suggest you set the page to see 100 entries):
https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/about/people-in-parliament/members-search/list-all-members
To find your electorate enter your suburb and postcode into the following page – District means lower house and Region means upper house. You can also use an interactive map from this page.
https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/about/electorates
Once you know your District and Region you can look up your MPs – you can use google for this.
Find an example email on the following page on this website:
Health Workers Law Emails
Please do change it to make it your own, politicians tend to ignore template emails. For talking points, see the example email and you will find ideas and links to studies on the following page on the AVN website:
https://avn.org.au/information/list-mps-senators-lobbying/
The Legislation
The bill consists of amendments to established Acts, and is described as:
A Bill for an Act to amend the Health Services Act 1988 and the Ambulance Services Act 1986 to provide for directions relating to the vaccination of persons employed or engaged by certain hospitals, health service establishments and ambulance services and for other purposes.
View all information about the bill on the Victorian Government website here:
Health Services Amendment (Mandatory Vaccination of Healthcare Workers) Bill 2020
Two PDFs are available for download, both are fairly short – you can download them from the above page or from this website, below:
Bill Introduction PDF
Bill EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (i.e. notes) PDF


australiannationalreview--2020-05-02--mmWave 5G: what you need to know

mmWave 5G: what you need to know

You ’ ve probably heard of 5G and its ability to provide fast speeds at low latency with higher capacity , but what you might not know is what goes into making 5G a reality .
5G , like 4G , is made up of many different technologies all working together to give you a great experience , wherever you go .
One such technology that brings 5G to life is mmWave.incl mmWave – pronounced as “ millimetre wave ” – is a short-range , high-frequency network technology that really shows off what 5G can do .
It ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so to speak .
If you think of a network like a pipe , you can only force so much down that pipe before things become congested .
We ’ re always looking to create newer , wider pipes so more data can be carried across our network for more people at once .
That ’ s where mmWave comes in .
mmWave has a lot more bandwidth on offer .
It ’ s another step towards delivering on 5G ’ s potential with super-fast speeds and more capacity .
It got @ @ @ @ @ @ @ frequency it uses – which is what your phone uses to talk to mobile base stations to make calls , send texts and keep your data running fast and smooth .
What you might not know is previous generations of mobile coverage have often operated over a number of different frequencies , all working together seamlessly to ensure a fantastic experience that offers great coverage and speed whether you ’ re using it in a building , a train station or out on the street .
5G is very similar in that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together to deliver its potential of great speed , low latency and high capacity for all our customers .
We ’ ve already rolled out 5G coverage , using 3.6Ghz spectrum , to 32 metro and regional cities , and are on track to reach into 35 cities by mid-year .
mmWave , which operates on higher frequencies like the 26GHz Telstra is using for live trials , will be added to the mix in the near future as one of those extra layers .
mmWave higher frequency means it can offer a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shorter range .
mmWave cells broadcast a signal up to a few hundred metres from the base station , meaning it ’ s best suited for areas where a high amount of users are concentrated – places like shopping centres ; crowded inner-city train stations and even stadiums can all benefit from the capabilities of mmWave .
Think how good it would be to have less congestion and awesome data speed on New Year ’ s Eve in Sydney Harbour , Federation Square or Riverbank .
That ’ s the power of mmWave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ video to a smartphone or tablet , or holding video calls and send amazing pictures to each other while attending the Melbourne Cricket Ground requires the immense bandwidth and speed that mmWave can offer , and it ’ s perfectly tuned for the task .
mmWave is not new – it is already used in Australia for wireless services like fixed point-to-point communications infrastructure and satellite internet .
Recent advancements have now opened the digital door to high-speed wireless .
We know there ’ s a lot of talk about the public safety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We ’ ve completed extensive testing of our 5G network infrastructure in real-world settings using commercially available 5G devices , and our data confirms two things .
Firstly , our 5G technology produces electromagnetic energy ( EME ) levels at around 1000 times below the safety limits in many cases .
Secondly , all our testing has found 5G EME levels to be similar to 3G , 4G and Wi-Fi .
Through our 5G Innovation Centre on the Gold Coast and via live trials , we ’ re continuing to explore technology like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more places in Australia .
It represents the next step in ongoing technical leadership , unlocks greater potential for our customers using this incredible new technology and , as we enhanc

By Channa Seneviratne
You’ve probably heard of 5G and its ability to provide fast speeds at low latency with higher capacity, but what you might not know is what goes into making 5G a reality. 5G, like 4G, is made up of many different technologies all working together to give you a great experience, wherever you go. One such technology that brings 5G to life is mmWave.incl
What is mmWave?
mmWave – pronounced as “millimetre wave” – is a short-range, high-frequency network technology that really shows off what 5G can do.
It’s the next ‘wave’ of 5G, so to speak.
If you think of a network like a pipe, you can only force so much down that pipe before things become congested. We’re always looking to create newer, wider pipes so more data can be carried across our network for more people at once. That’s where mmWave comes in.
mmWave has a lot more bandwidth on offer. It’s another step towards delivering on 5G’s potential with super-fast speeds and more capacity.
It got its catchy name from the type of frequency it uses – which is what your phone uses to talk to mobile base stations to make calls, send texts and keep your data running fast and smooth. What you might not know is previous generations of mobile coverage have often operated over a number of different frequencies, all working together seamlessly to ensure a fantastic experience that offers great coverage and speed whether you’re using it in a building, a train station or out on the street.
5G is very similar in that we will be layering several different frequency technologies together to deliver its potential of great speed, low latency and high capacity for all our customers.
We’ve already rolled out 5G coverage, using 3.6Ghz spectrum, to 32 metro and regional cities, and are on track to reach into 35 cities by mid-year. mmWave, which operates on higher frequencies like the 26GHz Telstra is using for live trials, will be added to the mix in the near future as one of those extra layers.
How does mmWave work?
mmWave higher frequency means it can offer a lot of capacity and bandwidth over a shorter range. mmWave cells broadcast a signal up to a few hundred metres from the base station, meaning it’s best suited for areas where a high amount of users are concentrated – places like shopping centres; crowded inner-city train stations and even stadiums can all benefit from the capabilities of mmWave.
Think how good it would be to have less congestion and awesome data speed on New Year’s Eve in Sydney Harbour, Federation Square or Riverbank. That’s the power of mmWave!
Having thousands of attendees stream 4K video to a smartphone or tablet, or holding video calls and send amazing pictures to each other while attending the Melbourne Cricket Ground requires the immense bandwidth and speed that mmWave can offer, and it’s perfectly tuned for the task.
Extensive testing
mmWave is not new – it is already used in Australia for wireless services like fixed point-to-point communications infrastructure and satellite internet. Recent advancements have now opened the digital door to high-speed wireless.
We know there’s a lot of talk about the public safety impact of new, high-frequency networks. We’ve completed extensive testing of our 5G network infrastructure in real-world settings using commercially available 5G devices, and our data confirms two things. Firstly, our 5G technology produces electromagnetic energy (EME) levels at around 1000 times below the safety limits in many cases. Secondly, all our testing has found 5G EME levels to be similar to 3G, 4G and Wi-Fi.
Through our 5G Innovation Centre on the Gold Coast and via live trials, we’re continuing to explore technology like mmWave as we roll out 5G to more places in Australia. It represents the next step in ongoing technical leadership, unlocks greater potential for our customers using this incredible new technology and, as we enhanc


australiannationalreview--2020-05-02--World’s 1st Coronavirus Vaccine Is Ready For Human Testing, And It Will Help Save Lives

With each passing day , the Wuhan Coronavirus continues to spread like wildfire not just in China , but also several parts of the globe .
Today it has infected over 78,000 people and has killed over 2700 .
The fear for contracting the COVID-19 has resulted in major global events like the Mobile World Congress to get cancelled with various participants hesitant to step out of the country .
And this fear also surrounds the upcoming 2020 Tokyo Olympics .
Need for a vaccine to stop this novel coronavirus is needed today more than ever .
And it looks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for long after all .
Scientists since the news of the outbreak have been working on a vaccine to combat and prevent people from the novel coronavirus and now a company called Moderna has announced that it has finally developed a coronavirus vaccine that will soon be ready for human testing .
First reported by the Wall Street Journal , the vaccine has already been provided to the US governments at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda .
It reveals that there are two doses to the vaccine , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an adult to save him/her against infection .
Looking at the pace in which the research is moving a final product for human trial could be ready as early as July this year .
While it sure feels like a lot of time , you need to understand that the rate at which the research for the vaccine is moving at , is unprecedented , to say the least .
Researchers need to make sure a number of things before they decide to inject the vaccine into a human .
Not only should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but it should also protect the person from contracting the virus for a considerable amount of time .
Moreover , it shouldn ’ t come with any adverse side effects or cause severe harm to a person ’ s body .
Researchers will also have to look at how it pairs with existing common medication that people consume .

by Monit Khanna
With each passing day, the Wuhan Coronavirus continues to spread like wildfire not just in China, but also several parts of the globe. Today it has infected over 78,000 people and has killed over 2700.
The fear for contracting the COVID-19 has resulted in major global events like the Mobile World Congress to get cancelled with various participants hesitant to step out of the country. And this fear also surrounds the upcoming 2020 Tokyo Olympics.
Need for a vaccine to stop this novel coronavirus is needed today more than ever. And it looks like we might not have to wait for long after all.
Scientists since the news of the outbreak have been working on a vaccine to combat and prevent people from the novel coronavirus and now a company called Moderna has announced that it has finally developed a coronavirus vaccine that will soon be ready for human testing.
First reported by the Wall Street Journal, the vaccine has already been provided to the US governments at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda. It reveals that there are two doses to the vaccine, and the twin doses are designed for an adult to save him/her against infection.
Looking at the pace in which the research is moving a final product for human trial could be ready as early as July this year. While it sure feels like a lot of time, you need to understand that the rate at which the research for the vaccine is moving at, is unprecedented, to say the least.
Researchers need to make sure a number of things before they decide to inject the vaccine into a human. Not only should it work as we intend it to, but it should also protect the person from contracting the virus for a considerable amount of time.
Moreover, it shouldn’t come with any adverse side effects or cause severe harm to a person’s body. Researchers will also have to look at how it pairs with existing common medication that people consume.