australiannationalreview--2020-08-24--No lockdown, no masks, no hysteria… NO PROBLEM: Sweden didn’t go into a corona coma and it’s living

No lockdown , no masks , no hysteria… NO PROBLEM : Sweden didn ’ t go into a corona coma and it ’ s living in glorious normality .
A few days ago , I took a stroll to the shops .
It was a glorious morning and the parks and cafés were full of families enjoying the sunshine .
Perhaps the shops were a little quieter than they would have been a year ago ; but they were busy enough .
The restaurants were preparing for lunch ; the mood was relaxed and happy .
And nobody — yes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That , of course , is the giveaway .
I wasn ’ t in Britain but in Sweden , a nation which stood alone in Europe in refusing to institute lockdown .
And as I queued to buy my son an ice cream , I was struck by the contrast with the situation back home .
Like most people , I never imagined that the lockdown would last so long , or that the consequences would be so calamitous .
Indeed , a few weeks after Boris Johnson announced the draconian restrictions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on these pages that fears of a second Great Depression were overblown , and that with the right spirit , Britain would quickly bounce back .
But as the months went by and we sank into inertia , my optimism evaporated .
Recent figures suggest that our economy shrank by 20 per cent in the first three months of lockdown , a far worse decline than in other industrial countries such as the U.S. and Germany .
Most experts believe the worst is yet to come , with the Bank of England predicting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end of the year .
And even that may be too optimistic .
Yet despite these dire projections and the need to get the nation up and running — and in spite of the good news on the dramatic fall in death rates and admissions to hospital — parts of Britain remain in the grip of near-terminal paralysis .
City centres are deserted , commuter trains empty and the offices that are open operating with skeleton staff .
As a result , countless shops , pubs , restaurants and cafes have not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do so .
As for Boris Johnson , he appeared to have vanished without a trace — at least until the Mail tracked him down to a remote Scottish location this week .
The Government seems incapable of giving a lead and the public mood is characterised by bickering and bitter negativity .
There is little sign of the upbeat , can-do spirit we badly need to revive our national fortunes .
So it was with a sense of relief that two weeks ago I boarded the plane to the Swedish capital Stockholm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shops and offices open throughout , insisted that children went to school and still do not tell their citizens to wear masks .
Yet I can ’ t deny I felt a twinge of anxiety .
As fervent admirers of all things Scandinavian , we ’ d arranged our family holiday when the coronavirus was merely a glint in the eye of a Chinese bat .
Occasionally I wondered if we might be sensible to cancel it .
But my wife , a much braver person than me , would not hear of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attractions of cinnamon buns , unspoiled forests and glittering Baltic waters , I was curious to see how the Swedes were getting on .
For months their country has been the great outlier , inspiring admiration and horror in equal measure .
Some reports claimed that ordinary life was unchanged .
Others , especially in Left-wing circles , attacked Sweden as a dystopian disaster zone , as if the streets were littered with unburied bodies .
The author of the country ’ s coronavirus strategy , a mild-mannered state epidemiologist called Anders Tegnell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controversial men in Europe .
From the start , he insisted that mandatory lockdown was a waste of time .
Sweden had a long-established plan for a pandemic , Mr Tegnell said , and was going to stick to it .
People should be sensible , wash their hands , avoid public transport and keep a safe distance , but that was it .
Closing schools was ‘ meaningless ’ .
Shutting borders was ‘ ridiculous ’ .
Masks were , by and large , a waste of time .
Shops and restaurants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked why Sweden was not following Germany , France and Britain in locking down , Mr Tegnell had a robust answer .
Other countries , he said , had ‘ panicked ’ .
But panicking was not the Swedish way .
Even as the virus spread , death rates soared and hospitals in Italy and Spain were overwhelmed , Sweden stuck to its guns .
No lockdown .
The results were not perfect .
Like us , the Swedes failed to protect their care homes .
By the time I landed in Stockholm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 57 per 100,000 people , far worse than in neighbouring Nordic countries .
In fairness , though , Sweden is in parts more densely populated than most of Norway , Denmark and Finland , with three large cities in Stockholm , Gothenburg and Malmo .
And Sweden ’ s death rate is still lower than those in Belgium ( 87 per 100,000 people ) , Spain ( 62 ) , Britain ( 62 ) and Italy ( 58 ) — all of which did go into lockdown .
So what did I make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s easy .
After the negativity , paranoia , moaning and squabbling of Britain , Sweden was paradise .
The contrast struck me almost immediately at the supermarket .
Usually the sky-high Scandinavian prices leave me wincing in anguish .
But this time I barely noticed them , too busy enjoying the lack of queues outside the shop , the absence of masks and the generally relaxed atmosphere .
Nobody recoiled in horror when our trolley came within five metres of them .
Nor did people shrink in terror when another shopper appeared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ norm in British supermarkets these days .
That set the tone for the next two weeks .
For the Swedes , summer life has carried on as normal .
Perhaps people give strangers a little more distance than they usually would — but so sensibly , so discreetly , that you barely noticed .
When we went kayaking in the gorgeous Stockholm archipelago , the guide told us that he was fully booked at weekends , even though foreign tourist numbers had plummeted .
Similarly , when we visited the stunning Baltic island @ @ @ @ @ @ @ version of Cornwall , the holiday season was in full swing .
The restaurants were busy and we often needed a booking to get in .
Yes , we were offered hand sanitiser on arrival , but there was no great song and dance about it .
Since most Swedes speak excellent English , we often asked people what they made of it all .
And the answers were always the same .
Yes , they were sorry that the virus had got into their care homes .
But without exception , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
By this time , with the A-level shambles beginning to unfold back home , I was feeling miserable about the prospect of returning .
But perhaps the Swedish experience was too good to be true ?
I had a look at the latest figures to find out .
On August 3 , the day we arrived in Stockholm , just one Swedish person was reported to have died of Covid-19 .
The next day ’ s death toll was three .
The following day ’ s was 13 ; then it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rushworth , an American-born doctor in a Stockholm A & E department , he hasn ’ t seen a single Covid-19 patient in a month : ‘ Basically , ’ he writes , ‘ Covid is in all practical senses over and done with in Sweden.
’ So should Britain have followed the Swedish example ?
One obvious counter-argument is that Britain is even more densely populated , with almost 70 million people to Sweden ’ s ten million .
Perhaps we were always going to need some sort of lockdown , if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , though , I think the comparison shows us in an almost embarrassing light .
In the first three months , Sweden ’ s economy shrank by approximately 9 per cent — less than half the downturn in our own economy .
Our children stayed at home ; theirs went to school .
Our businesses closed ; theirs stayed open .
Our social and cultural life ground to a halt ; theirs continued — with some sensible restrictions .
At the top , the difference could hardly be more glaring .
Sweden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their government calmly followed it .
Even as international criticism of his tactics mounted , Mr Tegnell remained calm .
Again and again he repeated that there was no point in panicking , no point in making crowd-pleasing gestures and no point in committing economic suicide .
Contrast that with Britain ’ s politicians , floundering around like drunkards at closing time , flip-flopping on policy and constantly being dragged into ever more stringent measures to appease the public hysteria .
But perhaps it ’ s too easy to blame Boris Johnson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all , merely a reflection of the society they serve .
Mr Tegnell ’ s approach worked because the Swedes are a serious , sensible , law-abiding lot , who believe in individual responsibility and can be trusted to behave themselves .
Again , contrast that with the scenes here : first the panic-buying of toilet rolls ; then the punch-ups in supermarket aisles and car parks ; the absurd crowds on South Coast beaches ; even the mobs of ‘ anti-racist ’ anarchists who thought a pandemic was the ideal time to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I know .
And I can ’ t deny that when we flew back to face a fortnight ’ s quarantine , I felt distinctly depressed , not just at the thought of all those blasted masks , but at the prospect of all the Left-wing whining , Right-wing bickering , political incompetence and general irresponsibility ahead .
So in Scandinavian spirit , here ’ s a positive note on which to end .
Tragic as the death toll in Britain has been , it has not come close to the 250,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apocalyptic model , which reportedly inspired Boris Johnson ’ s decision to impose a lockdown .
The death rate has been declining for months — a 95 per cent fall since the peak in April .
Coronavirus casualties are now six times lower than deaths from flu and pneumonia .
In the week to July 31 , just 2.2 per cent of deaths in England and Wales were caused by Covid .
Children don ’ t seem to suffer from the virus , or spread it much .
Just one healthy child is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Britain , and there is not a single case recorded worldwide of a child giving the virus to a teacher .
We know who is at greatest risk ( the very old , the very fat , people with Caribbean and Asian backgrounds or with underlying problems such as diabetes and lung disease ) , and our clinicians have got much better at treating and managing the disease .
There ’ s no reason , in other words , why Britain ’ s politicians can ’ t change the record — and they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it disrupts their precious holidays .
For too long we ’ ve been ruled by paranoia .
But economic logic and sheer common sense dictate that we can ’ t remain paralysed for a minute longer .
The priority now must be to restart the engines of enterprise and rebuild the economy .
Life always involves an element of risk , and as long as we ’ re sensible , we need to get back to normal and free ourselves from our national funk .
So now is the time — albeit belatedly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ call to arms .
He may fancy himself as the reincarnation of Churchill , but so far he has failed to match the great man ’ s courage at a time of national crisis .
Now , more than ever , he needs to throw off his caution and rally the nation .
The truth is that for many of us , the last few months have been one long holiday from reality .
But the summer is almost over and the economy is on life-support .
It ’ s time we got @ @ @ @

No lockdown, no masks, no hysteria… NO PROBLEM: Sweden didn’t go into a corona coma and it’s living in glorious normality.
By DOMINIC SANDBROOK
A few days ago, I took a stroll to the shops. It was a glorious morning and the parks and cafés were full of families enjoying the sunshine.
Perhaps the shops were a little quieter than they would have been a year ago; but they were busy enough.
The restaurants were preparing for lunch; the mood was relaxed and happy. And nobody — yes, nobody — was wearing a mask.
That, of course, is the giveaway.
I wasn’t in Britain but in Sweden, a nation which stood alone in Europe in refusing to institute lockdown.
And as I queued to buy my son an ice cream, I was struck by the contrast with the situation back home. Like most people, I never imagined that the lockdown would last so long, or that the consequences would be so calamitous.
A taste of freedom: Swedes have been free to soak up the sun, play sports and socialise during the pandemic
A strict three-month long lockdown in the UK is expected to see the economy contract by around 11.5 per cent in 2020
This graph shows how the UK’s economy has already been ravaged by the pandemic, with sharp falls in GDP, retail sales, industrial production and construction work – even when the latest figures include only a brief period of lockdown. The UK’s unemployment rate increased only slightly in the latest figures, but separate statistics show a nearly 70 per cent rise in the number of people claiming Universal Credit
This chart shows forecasts for the rest of 2020, with the UK’s GDP set to plunge by more than Sweden’s – while Britain is left with a larger budget deficit because of the cost of propping up the economy. Britain will also have a deficit in the current account, which is related to trade – showing the flow of goods, services and money between countries. However, the EU expects Sweden to have a higher unemployment rate this year
Indeed, a few weeks after Boris Johnson announced the draconian restrictions on lives and livelihoods, I wrote on these pages that fears of a second Great Depression were overblown, and that with the right spirit, Britain would quickly bounce back.
But as the months went by and we sank into inertia, my optimism evaporated.
Recent figures suggest that our economy shrank by 20 per cent in the first three months of lockdown, a far worse decline than in other industrial countries such as the U.S. and Germany.
Most experts believe the worst is yet to come, with the Bank of England predicting that unemployment will hit 2.5 million by the end of the year. And even that may be too optimistic.
Yet despite these dire projections and the need to get the nation up and running — and in spite of the good news on the dramatic fall in death rates and admissions to hospital — parts of Britain remain in the grip of near-terminal paralysis.
City centres are deserted, commuter trains empty and the offices that are open operating with skeleton staff. As a result, countless shops, pubs, restaurants and cafes have not bothered to reopen — and may never do so.
As for Boris Johnson, he appeared to have vanished without a trace — at least until the Mail tracked him down to a remote Scottish location this week.
The Government seems incapable of giving a lead and the public mood is characterised by bickering and bitter negativity. There is little sign of the upbeat, can-do spirit we badly need to revive our national fortunes.
Sweden had a long-established plan for a pandemic and was going to stick to it. Pictured, people play beach volleyball at Gardet park amid the coronavirus outbreak in April
So it was with a sense of relief that two weeks ago I boarded the plane to the Swedish capital Stockholm. For in Sweden, leaders kept shops and offices open throughout, insisted that children went to school and still do not tell their citizens to wear masks.
Yet I can’t deny I felt a twinge of anxiety. As fervent admirers of all things Scandinavian, we’d arranged our family holiday when the coronavirus was merely a glint in the eye of a Chinese bat. Occasionally I wondered if we might be sensible to cancel it. But my wife, a much braver person than me, would not hear of it.
And quite apart from the attractions of cinnamon buns, unspoiled forests and glittering Baltic waters, I was curious to see how the Swedes were getting on.
For months their country has been the great outlier, inspiring admiration and horror in equal measure.
Some reports claimed that ordinary life was unchanged. Others, especially in Left-wing circles, attacked Sweden as a dystopian disaster zone, as if the streets were littered with unburied bodies.
The author of the country’s coronavirus strategy, a mild-mannered state epidemiologist called Anders Tegnell, has become one of the most controversial men in Europe.
From the start, he insisted that mandatory lockdown was a waste of time. Sweden had a long-established plan for a pandemic, Mr Tegnell said, and was going to stick to it.
People should be sensible, wash their hands, avoid public transport and keep a safe distance, but that was it.
Closing schools was ‘meaningless’. Shutting borders was ‘ridiculous’. Masks were, by and large, a waste of time. Shops and restaurants should stay open.
And when interviewers asked why Sweden was not following Germany, France and Britain in locking down, Mr Tegnell had a robust answer. Other countries, he said, had ‘panicked’. But panicking was not the Swedish way.
Even as the virus spread, death rates soared and hospitals in Italy and Spain were overwhelmed, Sweden stuck to its guns. No lockdown.
The results were not perfect. Like us, the Swedes failed to protect their care homes.
By the time I landed in Stockholm, their death rate stood at almost 57 per 100,000 people, far worse than in neighbouring Nordic countries.
In fairness, though, Sweden is in parts more densely populated than most of Norway, Denmark and Finland, with three large cities in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmo.
And Sweden’s death rate is still lower than those in Belgium (87 per 100,000 people), Spain (62), Britain (62) and Italy (58) — all of which did go into lockdown.
So what did I make of it? Well, that’s easy. After the negativity, paranoia, moaning and squabbling of Britain, Sweden was paradise.
The contrast struck me almost immediately at the supermarket. Usually the sky-high Scandinavian prices leave me wincing in anguish.
But this time I barely noticed them, too busy enjoying the lack of queues outside the shop, the absence of masks and the generally relaxed atmosphere.
Nobody recoiled in horror when our trolley came within five metres of them. Nor did people shrink in terror when another shopper appeared in the aisle, as is the norm in British supermarkets these days.
That set the tone for the next two weeks. For the Swedes, summer life has carried on as normal. Perhaps people give strangers a little more distance than they usually would — but so sensibly, so discreetly, that you barely noticed.
When we went kayaking in the gorgeous Stockholm archipelago, the guide told us that he was fully booked at weekends, even though foreign tourist numbers had plummeted.
Similarly, when we visited the stunning Baltic island of Gotland, a kind of Scandinavian version of Cornwall, the holiday season was in full swing. The restaurants were busy and we often needed a booking to get in. Yes, we were offered hand sanitiser on arrival, but there was no great song and dance about it.
Since most Swedes speak excellent English, we often asked people what they made of it all. And the answers were always the same.
Yes, they were sorry that the virus had got into their care homes. But without exception, the Swedes were glad to have escaped lockdown.
By this time, with the A-level shambles beginning to unfold back home, I was feeling miserable about the prospect of returning.
But perhaps the Swedish experience was too good to be true? I had a look at the latest figures to find out.
On August 3, the day we arrived in Stockholm, just one Swedish person was reported to have died of Covid-19. The next day’s death toll was three. The following day’s was 13; then it was down to six.
According to Sebastian Rushworth, an American-born doctor in a Stockholm A&E department, he hasn’t seen a single Covid-19 patient in a month: ‘Basically,’ he writes, ‘Covid is in all practical senses over and done with in Sweden.’ So should Britain have followed the Swedish example?
One obvious counter-argument is that Britain is even more densely populated, with almost 70 million people to Sweden’s ten million. Perhaps we were always going to need some sort of lockdown, if only temporarily.
In every other respect, though, I think the comparison shows us in an almost embarrassing light.
In the first three months, Sweden’s economy shrank by approximately 9 per cent — less than half the downturn in our own economy. Our children stayed at home; theirs went to school. Our businesses closed; theirs stayed open. Our social and cultural life ground to a halt; theirs continued — with some sensible restrictions.
At the top, the difference could hardly be more glaring. Sweden’s scientists drew up a plan, and their government calmly followed it.
Even as international criticism of his tactics mounted, Mr Tegnell remained calm. Again and again he repeated that there was no point in panicking, no point in making crowd-pleasing gestures and no point in committing economic suicide.
Contrast that with Britain’s politicians, floundering around like drunkards at closing time, flip-flopping on policy and constantly being dragged into ever more stringent measures to appease the public hysteria.
But perhaps it’s too easy to blame Boris Johnson & Co — who are, after all, merely a reflection of the society they serve. Mr Tegnell’s approach worked because the Swedes are a serious, sensible, law-abiding lot, who believe in individual responsibility and can be trusted to behave themselves.
Again, contrast that with the scenes here: first the panic-buying of toilet rolls; then the punch-ups in supermarket aisles and car parks; the absurd crowds on South Coast beaches; even the mobs of ‘anti-racist’ anarchists who thought a pandemic was the ideal time to rant and rave. All pretty miserable, I know.
And I can’t deny that when we flew back to face a fortnight’s quarantine, I felt distinctly depressed, not just at the thought of all those blasted masks, but at the prospect of all the Left-wing whining, Right-wing bickering, political incompetence and general irresponsibility ahead.
So in Scandinavian spirit, here’s a positive note on which to end.
Tragic as the death toll in Britain has been, it has not come close to the 250,000 predicted by Professor Neil Ferguson’s apocalyptic model, which reportedly inspired Boris Johnson’s decision to impose a lockdown.
So what did I make of it? Well, that’s easy. After the negativity, paranoia, moaning and squabbling of Britain, Sweden was paradise
The death rate has been declining for months — a 95 per cent fall since the peak in April. Coronavirus casualties are now six times lower than deaths from flu and pneumonia. In the week to July 31, just 2.2 per cent of deaths in England and Wales were caused by Covid.
Children don’t seem to suffer from the virus, or spread it much. Just one healthy child is known to have died from Covid in Britain, and there is not a single case recorded worldwide of a child giving the virus to a teacher.
We know who is at greatest risk (the very old, the very fat, people with Caribbean and Asian backgrounds or with underlying problems such as diabetes and lung disease), and our clinicians have got much better at treating and managing the disease.
There’s no reason, in other words, why Britain’s politicians can’t change the record — and they must do so fast, even if it disrupts their precious holidays.
For too long we’ve been ruled by paranoia. But economic logic and sheer common sense dictate that we can’t remain paralysed for a minute longer.
The priority now must be to restart the engines of enterprise and rebuild the economy. Life always involves an element of risk, and as long as we’re sensible, we need to get back to normal and free ourselves from our national funk.
So now is the time — albeit belatedly — for Boris Johnson to issue a call to arms.
He may fancy himself as the reincarnation of Churchill, but so far he has failed to match the great man’s courage at a time of national crisis. Now, more than ever, he needs to throw off his caution and rally the nation.
The truth is that for many of us, the last few months have been one long holiday from reality. But the summer is almost over and the economy is on life-support. It’s time we got back to work.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-24--Lawyer Serene: Teffaha explains the Law that regulates Government in respect of Covid-19

Lawyer Serene : Teffaha explains the Law that regulates Government in respect of Covid-19 .
Draconian measures undertaken by Australian @ @ @ @ @ furthermore Immoral and are outside the bounds of civil society in Melbourne , Victoria in @ @ @ @

URGENT: JUST 7 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...


australiannationalreview--2020-08-24--AstraZeneca Pleads Guilty In Cancer Medicine Scheme

AstraZeneca , the large pharmaceutical company , pleaded guilty today to a felony charge of health care fraud and agreed to pay $ 355 million to settle criminal and civil accusations that it engaged in a nationwide scheme to illegally market a prostate cancer drug .
The government said the company ’ s employees had given illegal financial inducements to as many as 400 doctors across the country to persuade them to prescribe the drug , Zoladex .
Those inducements included thousands of free samples of Zoladex , worth hundreds of dollars each , which the physicians then billed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , prosecutors said .
The company also gave doctors financial grants , paid them as consultants and provided free travel and entertainment , the government said .
The $ 355 million that AstraZeneca , a British company , agreed to pay is among the largest settlements in a heath care fraud case .
Of that amount , about $ 64 million is a criminal fine .
The company will pay about $ 266 million to the federal government to settle most of the civil accusations .
An additional $ 25 million will go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Medicaid programs , which are partly financed by the states .
The largest fine for health care fraud came in a settlement in October 2001 by TAP Pharmaceutical Products .
It agreed to pay $ 875 million to settle criminal and civil accusations that it had engaged in a scheme that largely mirrors the allegations made by prosecutors against AstraZeneca .

AstraZeneca, the large pharmaceutical company, pleaded guilty today to a felony charge of health care fraud and agreed to pay $355 million to settle criminal and civil accusations that it engaged in a nationwide scheme to illegally market a prostate cancer drug.
The government said the company’s employees had given illegal financial inducements to as many as 400 doctors across the country to persuade them to prescribe the drug, Zoladex. Those inducements included thousands of free samples of Zoladex, worth hundreds of dollars each, which the physicians then billed to Medicare and other federal health care programs, prosecutors said. The company also gave doctors financial grants, paid them as consultants and provided free travel and entertainment, the government said.
The $355 million that AstraZeneca, a British company, agreed to pay is among the largest settlements in a heath care fraud case. Of that amount, about $64 million is a criminal fine. The company will pay about $266 million to the federal government to settle most of the civil accusations. An additional $25 million will go to settle accusations that it defrauded the Medicaid programs, which are partly financed by the states.
The largest fine for health care fraud came in a settlement in October 2001 by TAP Pharmaceutical Products. It agreed to pay $875 million to settle criminal and civil accusations that it had engaged in a scheme that largely mirrors the allegations made by prosecutors against AstraZeneca.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-24--Lives Are Being Lost Because Our Government Is Restricting The Prevention And The Cure!!

Lives Are Being Lost Because Our Government Is Restricting The Prevention And The Cure !
!
That ’ s right @ @ @ @ @ CURE AND A PREVENTION for Covid 19 and WE THE PEOPLE Are Being DENIED IT @ @ @ @ @ around the world using this protocol to treat and prevent Covid .
If you wish @ @ @ @ @ share this message with everyone you know .
Please tell people due to the high @ @ @ @ @ site there may be delays in getting onto the site .
If you are unable @ @ @ @ @ wait 5-10 minutes and then retry .
We need to stand up Australia .
Please @ @ @ @ @ .
Please do not use the full website link on your Facebook page as this @ @ @ @ @ write something like this .
To all my Facebook Friends Please Check Out The Site @ @ @ @ @ Australian People ” there is an important message on this site .

Lives Are Being Lost Because Our Government Is Restricting The Prevention And The Cure!!
That’s right Australia. There is A CURE AND A PREVENTION for Covid 19 and WE THE PEOPLE Are Being DENIED IT!
There are Doctors all around the world using this protocol to treat and prevent Covid.
If you wish to show your support please share this message with everyone you know. Please tell people due to the high number of visits to this site there may be delays in getting onto the site. If you are unable to reach this site please wait 5-10 minutes and then retry. We need to stand up Australia. Please Sign and Share This Website.
Please do not use the full website link on your Facebook page as this will be censored. Simply write something like this.
To all my Facebook Friends Please Check Out The Site “The Voice Of The Australian People” there is an important message on this site.


Transhumanism and You

Transhumanism promises us a fantastic future in which humans overcome disease , aging , and even death .
It just @ @ @ @ @ final step and merge fully with machines .
But its secret past in crypto-eugenics reveals @ @ @ @ @ in which a GenRich elite rule over the GenPoor masses .
Are you ready to @ @ @ @ @


australiannationalreview--2020-08-24--Brett Sutton confirms Melbourne Covid deaths are not Covid deaths

Australian National Review ’ s community of readers and following is stronger than ever .
However , advertising revenues across @ @ @ @ @ especially without a paywall .
Will you help us remain a force for good and @ @ @ @ @ government and industry ?
We want to continue on our mission to enforce a free @ @ @ @ @ day and age where mainstream media and big corporations are going all out to suppress @ @ @ @ @ without supporters donations we can ’ t fund ANR .
By supporting The Australian National @ @ @ @ @ can afford , you can help us ensure that everyone is informed of the truth @ @ @ @ @ press for years to come .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-24--Vaccine whistleblower warns of serious dangers to humans at what they are going to put in the vaccin

Vaccine whistleblower warns of serious dangers to humans at what they are going to put in the vaccines .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-24--THE REAL REASON THEY WANT YOU TO HATE DONALD TRUMP

THE REAL REASON THEY WANT YOU TO HATE DONALD TRUMP .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--NWO explained In 5 minutes

NWO explained In 5 minutes


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--A Columbia Journalism Review expose

A Columbia Journalism Review expose

A Columbia Journalism Review expose reveals that , to control global journalism , Bill Gates , has steered over $ 250 million to the BBC , NPR , NBC , Al Jazeera , ProPublica , National Journal , The Guardian , The New York Times , Univision , Medium , the Financial Times , The Atlantic , the Texas Tribune , Gannett , Washington Monthly , Le Monde , Center for Investigative Reporting , Pulitzer Center , National Press Foundation , International Center for Journalists , and a host of other groups .
To conceal his influence , Gates also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to other press outlets .
His press bribes have paid off .
During the pandemic , bought & braindead news outlets have treated Bill Gates as a public health expert—despite his lack of medical training or regulatory experience .
Gates also funds an army of independent fact checkers including the Poynter Institute and Gannett —which use their fact-checking platforms to “ silence detractors ” and to “ debunk ” as ‘ false conspiracy theories ’ and ‘ misinformation , ’ ” charges that Gates has championed and invested in biometric chips , vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines .
Gates media gifts says CJR author Tim Schwab , mean the “ critical reporting about the Gates Foundation is rare.
” The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation declined multiple interview requests from CJR and refused to disclose how much money it has funneled to journalists .
In 2007 , the LA Times published one of the only critical investigations on the Gates Foundation , exposing Gates ’ s holdings in companies that hurt people his foundation claims to help , like industries linked to child labor .
Lead reporter Charles Piller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to answer questions and pretty much refused to respond in any sort of way ” The study showed how Gates ’ s global health funding has steered the world ’ s aid agenda toward Gates ’ personal goals ( vaccines and GMO crops ) and away from issues such as emergency preparedness to respond to disease outbreaks , like the Ebola crisis .
“ They ’ ve dodged our questions and sought to undermine our coverage , ” says Park .

A Columbia Journalism Review expose.
By Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
A Columbia Journalism Review expose reveals that, to control global journalism, Bill Gates, has steered over $250 million to the BBC, NPR,NBC, Al Jazeera, ProPublica, National Journal, The Guardian, The New York Times, Univision, Medium, the Financial Times, The Atlantic, the Texas Tribune, Gannett, Washington Monthly, Le Monde, Center for Investigative Reporting, Pulitzer Center, National Press Foundation, International Center for Journalists, and a host of other groups. To conceal his influence, Gates also funneled unknown sums via subgrants for contracts to other press outlets.
His press bribes have paid off. During the pandemic, bought & braindead news outlets have treated Bill Gates as a public health expert—despite his lack of medical training or regulatory experience.
Gates also funds an army of independent fact checkers including the Poynter Institute and Gannett —which use their fact-checking platforms to “silence detractors” and to “debunk” as ‘false conspiracy theories’ and ‘misinformation,’” charges that Gates has championed and invested in biometric chips, vaccine IDS, satellite surveillance, and Covid vaccines.
Gates media gifts says CJR author Tim Schwab, mean the “critical reporting about the Gates Foundation is rare.” The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation declined multiple interview requests from CJR and refused to disclose how much money it has funneled to journalists.
In 2007, the LA Times published one of the only critical investigations on the Gates Foundation, exposing Gates’s holdings in companies that hurt people his foundation claims to help, like industries linked to child labor. Lead reporter Charles Piller, says: “they were unwilling to answer questions and pretty much refused to respond in any sort of way”
The study showed how Gates’s global health funding has steered the world’s aid agenda toward Gates’ personal goals (vaccines and GMO crops) and away from issues such as emergency preparedness to respond to disease outbreaks, like the Ebola crisis.
“They’ve dodged our questions and sought to undermine our coverage,” says Park.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--“We Have A Lot of Evidence That It’s A Fake Story All Over The World” – German Doctors on COVID-19

“ We Have A Lot of Evidence That It ’ s A Fake Story All Over The World ” – German Doctors on COVID-19 .
Is this article ‘ fake news ?
’ No , because the statement in the title that reads “ we have a lot of evidence that it ’ s a fake story all over the world ” is an actual quote from a representative of the group discussed in the article .
The statement was said .
Whether or not what the quote says is true , on the other hand , is up for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments , is up for the World Health Organization ( WHO ) to decide .
Is the title misleading or inaccurate ?
No , again , it ’ s a direct quote and represents the opinion of multiple health professionals .
Are these health professionals implying that COVID-19 is a fake virus ?
No , they are simply implying that it ’ s not as dangerous as it ’ s being made out to be.
, and I summarize some of that information below that has them coming to that conclusion .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ across all social media platforms , and those who write about them are experiencing the same .
Many of the claims these doctors make have been ‘ debunked ’ by mainstream media , federal health regulatory agencies and ‘ fact-checkers ’ that are patrolling the internet .
Any information that does not come from the ( WHO ) is not considered reliable , truthful or accurate , and that would include the information presented in this article and information shared by these experts in the field .
People are being encouraged to visit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and accurate information about COVID-19 instead of listening to doctors and scientists who oppose the narrative of these health authorities .
What Happened : More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called “ Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss.
” Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss stands for the “ Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee and was established to investigate all things that pertain to the new coronavirus such as the severity of the virus , and whether or not the actions taken by governments around the world , and in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and not causing more harm than good .
As the Corona-Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee , we will investigate why these restrictive measures were imposed upon us in our country as part of COVID-19 , why people are suffering now and whether there is proportionality of the measures to this disease caused by the SARS-COV-2 virus .
We have serious doubts that these measures are proportionate .
This needs to be examined , and since the parliaments – neither the opposition parties nor the ruling parties – have not convened a committee and it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time that we took this into our own hands .
We will invite and hear experts here in the Corona speaker group .
These are experts from all areas of life : Medicine , social affairs , law , economics and many more .
( source ) You can access the full english transcripts on the organizations website if interested .
This group has been giving multiple conferences in Germany , in one of the most recent , Dr. Heiko Schöning , one of the organizations leaders , stated that “ We have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the new coronavirus ) is a fake story all over the world.
” To put it in context , he wasn ’ t referring to the virus being fake , but simply that it ’ s no more dangerous than the seasonal flu ( or just as dangerous ) and that there is no justification for the measures being taken to combat it .
Why This Is Important : It can be confusing for many people to see so many doctors and many of the world ’ s most renowned scientists and infectious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is coming from the WHO and global governments .
Many scientists and doctors in North America are also expressing the same sentiments .
For example , The Physicians For Informed Consent ( PIC ) recently published a report titled “ Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.
” According to them , the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26 % .
You can read more about that and access their resources and reasoning here .
John P. A. Ioannidis , a professor of medicine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the infection fatality rate “ is close to 0 percent ” for people under the age of 45 years old .
You can read more about that here .
He and several other academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggest that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza , and published their reasoning in a study last month .
You can find that study and read more about that story here .
Michael Levitt , a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University criticized the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus and has claimed that , with regards to lockdown measures , that “ the level of stupidity going on here is amazing.
” You can read more about this here .
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi , a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history is also part of Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee mentioned above and has also expressed the same thing , multiple times early on in the pandemic all the way up to today .
Implementation of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly , exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us .
Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19 ?
I assert that the answer is simply , no .
– Bhakdi .
You can read more about him here .
Below are some interesting statistics from Canada .
( source ) We have to ask ourselves , why are so many experts in the field being completely censored .
Why is there so much information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our federal health regulatory agencies and organizations like the WHO ?
Why are these experts being heavily censored , and why are alternative media platforms being censored , punished and demonetized for sharing such information ?
Is there a battle for our perception happening right now ?
Is our consciousness being manipulated ?
Why is there so much conflicting information if everything is crystal clear ?
Why are alternative treatments that have shown tremendous amounts of success being completely ignored and ridiculed ?
What ’ s going on here , and how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are able to silence the voice of so many people ?
Should we not be examining information openly , transparently , and together ?
Become Part of CE ’ s Inner Circle Collective Evolution is one of the world ’ s fastest-growing conscious media and education companies providing news and tools to raise collective consciousness .
Get inside access to Collective Evolution by becoming a member of CETV .

“We Have A Lot of Evidence That It’s A Fake Story All Over The World” – German Doctors on COVID-19.
By Arjun Walia
Is this article ‘fake news?’ No, because the statement in the title that reads “we have a lot of evidence that it’s a fake story all over the world” is an actual quote from a representative of the group discussed in the article. The statement was said. Whether or not what the quote says is true, on the other hand, is up for you to decide or according to multiple governments, is up for the World Health Organization (WHO) to decide. Is the title misleading or inaccurate? No, again, it’s a direct quote and represents the opinion of multiple health professionals. Are these health professionals implying that COVID-19 is a fake virus? No, they are simply implying that it’s not as dangerous as it’s being made out to be., and I summarize some of that information below that has them coming to that conclusion.
These doctors and scientists are being heavily censored across all social media platforms, and those who write about them are experiencing the same. Many of the claims these doctors make have been ‘debunked’ by mainstream media, federal health regulatory agencies and ‘fact-checkers’ that are patrolling the internet. Any information that does not come from the (WHO) is not considered reliable, truthful or accurate, and that would include the information presented in this article and information shared by these experts in the field. People are being encouraged to visit the WHO’s website for real and accurate information about COVID-19 instead of listening to doctors and scientists who oppose the narrative of these health authorities.
What Happened: More than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called “Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss.” Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss stands for the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee and was established to investigate all things that pertain to the new coronavirus such as the severity of the virus, and whether or not the actions taken by governments around the world, and in this case the German government, are justified and not causing more harm than good.
As the Corona-Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, we will investigate why these restrictive measures were imposed upon us in our country as part of COVID-19, why people are suffering now and whether there is proportionality of the measures to this disease caused by the SARS-COV-2 virus. We have serious doubts that these measures are proportionate. This needs to be examined, and since the parliaments – neither the opposition parties nor the ruling parties – have not convened a committee and it is not even planned, it is high time that we took this into our own hands. We will invite and hear experts here in the Corona speaker group. These are experts from all areas of life: Medicine, social affairs, law, economics and many more. (source)
You can access the full english transcripts on the organizations website if interested.
This group has been giving multiple conferences in Germany, in one of the most recent, Dr. Heiko Schöning, one of the organizations leaders, stated that “We have a lot of evidence that it (the new coronavirus) is a fake story all over the world.” To put it in context, he wasn’t referring to the virus being fake, but simply that it’s no more dangerous than the seasonal flu (or just as dangerous) and that there is no justification for the measures being taken to combat it.
From the Web I also think it’s important to mention that a report published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus.
Below is a press conference held by representatives of the group that took place last month, you can find more important information below that.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--Plan to release genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida

A plan to release a horde of 750 million genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida and Texas is a step closer to fruition after a state regulator approved the idea , over the objections of many environmentalists .
Oxitec , a British-based biotechnology company , has targeted the US as a test site for a special version of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes .
The mosquitoes contain a protein that , when passed down to female offspring , will kill them and , it is hoped , prevent them from biting people and spreading diseases such as dengue fever and Zika .
On @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Florida department of agriculture and consumer services has given the green light to a plan to release the millions of mosquitoes in the Florida Keys , the string of picturesque islands that extend from the southern tip of the state , beginning this summer .
Last month , the US Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) also approved the Florida plan , as well as a further trial next year that will take place in Harris county in Texas , which includes Houston .
Proponents of the trial say that as only modified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people , will be released , there will be no danger to the public .
But the plan has caused uproar among conservation groups , which have said they intend to sue the EPA for allegedly failing to ascertain the environmental impact of the scheme .
Scientists have also expressed concerns about the oversight of the trial .
On Tuesday , opponents of the plan rallied outside the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District office , which has to deal with more than 40 species of mosquito in the region , to demand its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a “ Jurassic Park experiment ” , said Jaydee Hanson , policy director for the International Center for Technology Assessment and Center for Food Safety .
“ What could possibly go wrong ?
We don ’ t know , because they unlawfully refused to seriously analyze environmental risks.
” Barry Wray , executive director of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition added : “ People here in Florida do not consent to the genetically engineered mosquitoes or to being human experiments.
” Mosquitoes have long plagued people in the marsh-rich Florida environment .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ off with smoke or simply bury themselves in the sand to avoid them , while early white settlers slathered themselves in bear fat or burned oily rags .
More recently , authorities have conducted mass spraying of mosquito habitat with insecticides that have been linked to the deaths of non-target insects , such as bees .

Plan to release genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida.
By Oliver Milman
A plan to release a horde of 750 million genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida and Texas is a step closer to fruition after a state regulator approved the idea, over the objections of many environmentalists.
Oxitec, a British-based biotechnology company, has targeted the US as a test site for a special version of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. The mosquitoes contain a protein that, when passed down to female offspring, will kill them and, it is hoped, prevent them from biting people and spreading diseases such as dengue fever and Zika.
On Tuesday, it was announced that the Florida department of agriculture and consumer services has given the green light to a plan to release the millions of mosquitoes in the Florida Keys, the string of picturesque islands that extend from the southern tip of the state, beginning this summer.
Last month, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also approved the Florida plan, as well as a further trial next year that will take place in Harris county in Texas, which includes Houston.
Proponents of the trial say that as only modified male mosquitoes, which do not bite people, will be released, there will be no danger to the public.
But the plan has caused uproar among conservation groups, which have said they intend to sue the EPA for allegedly failing to ascertain the environmental impact of the scheme. Scientists have also expressed concerns about the oversight of the trial.
On Tuesday, opponents of the plan rallied outside the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District office, which has to deal with more than 40 species of mosquito in the region, to demand its board oppose the trial.
The plan is a “Jurassic Park experiment”, said Jaydee Hanson, policy director for the International Center for Technology Assessment and Center for Food Safety. “What could possibly go wrong? We don’t know, because they unlawfully refused to seriously analyze environmental risks.”
Barry Wray, executive director of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition added: “People here in Florida do not consent to the genetically engineered mosquitoes or to being human experiments.”
Mosquitoes have long plagued people in the marsh-rich Florida environment. Native Americans used to ward the biters off with smoke or simply bury themselves in the sand to avoid them, while early white settlers slathered themselves in bear fat or burned oily rags. More recently, authorities have conducted mass spraying of mosquito habitat with insecticides that have been linked to the deaths of non-target insects, such as bees.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--“Human 2.0”? A Wake-Up Call To The World


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--History of the Gates Foundation and Vaccine Injuries in India and Africa?

History of the Gates Foundation and Vaccine Injuries in India and Africa ?


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--Victorians call in citizens to email their Politicians to end the ludicrous lockdowns

Victorians call in citizens to email their Politicians to end the ludicrous lockdowns .
Time to email every single MP @ @ @ @ @ do not consent to an extra 12 months of lockdown .
Be polite , don @ @ @ @ @ we the people have the POWER !

Victorians call in citizens to email their Politicians to end the ludicrous lockdowns.
By Staff Reporter
MELBOURNIANS
Time to email every single MP and let them know we do not consent to an extra 12 months of lockdown.
Be polite, don’t swear and remember we the people have the POWER!
jacinta.allan@parliament.vic.gov.au
bruce.atkinson@parliament.vic.gov.au
steve.dimopoulos@parliament.vic.gov.au
mary-anne.thomas@parliament.vic.gov.au
lizzie.blandthorn@parliament.vic.gov.au
louise.staley@parliament.vic.gov.au
david.davis@parliament.vic.gov.au
emma.kealy@parliament.vic.gov.au
danny.pearson@parliament.vic.gov.au
gabrielle.williams@parliament.vic.gov.au
suzanna.sheed@parliament.vic.gov.au
christine.couzens@parliament.vic.gov.au
luke.donnellan@parliament.vic.gov.au
tim.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au
jenny.mikakos@parliament.vic.gov.au
steph.ryan@parliament.vic.gov.au
gordon.rich-phillips@parliament.vic.gov.au
mark.gepp@parliament.vic.gov.au
harriet.shing@parliament.vic.gov.au
daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
lily.dambrosio@parliament.vic.gov.au
john.eren@parliament.vic.gov.au
danielle.green@parliament.vic.gov.au
james.merlino@parliament.vic.gov.au
lisa.neville@parliament.vic.gov.au
adem.somyurek@parliament.vic.gov.au
wendy.lovell@parliament.vic.gov.au
peter.walsh@parliament.vic.gov.au
Edward.ODonohue@parliament.vic.gov.au
neale.burgess@parliament.vic.gov.au
matthew.guy@parliament.vic.gov.au
bernie.finn@parliament.vic.gov.au
gary.blackwood@parliament.vic.gov.au
tim.pallas@parliament.vic.gov.au
martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au
jaala.pulford@parliament.vic.gov.au
robin.scott@parliament.vic.gov.au
gayle.tierney@parliament.vic.gov.au
shaun.leane@parliament.vic.gov.au
nazih.elasmar@parliament.vic.gov.au
samantha.ratnam@parliament.vic.gov.au
david.hodgett@parliament.vic.gov.au
bronwyn.halfpenny@parliament.vic.gov.au
nick.wakeling@parliament.vic.gov.au
maree.edwards@parliament.vic.gov.au
jane.garrett@parliament.vic.gov.au
david.morris@parliament.vic.gov.au
michael.obrien@parliament.vic.gov.au
ryan.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au
colin.brooks@parliament.vic.gov.au
bill.tilley@parliament.vic.gov.au
sonya.kilkenny@parliament.vic.gov.au
brad.battin@parliament.vic.gov.au
russell.northe@parliament.vic.gov.au
martin.foley@parliament.vic.gov.au
marlene.kairouz@parliament.vic.gov.au
jill.hennessy@parliament.vic.gov.au
tim.bull@parliament.vic.gov.au
david.southwick@parliament.vic.gov.au
neil.angus@parliament.vic.gov.au
natalie.hutchins@parliament.vic.gov.au
tim.mccurdy@parliament.vic.gov.au
cindy.mcleish@parliament.vic.gov.au
anthony.carbines@parliament.vic.gov.au
tim.richardson@Parliament.vic.gov.au
nick.staikos@parliament.vic.gov.au
paul.edbrooke@parliament.vic.gov.au
ellen.sandell@parliament.vic.gov.au
craig.ondarchie@parliament.vic.gov.au
georgie.crozier@parliament.vic.gov.au
vicki.ward@parliament.vic.gov.au
frank.mcguire@parliament.vic.gov.au
josh.bull@parliament.vic.gov.au
sam.hibbins@parliament.vic.gov.au
ben.carroll@parliament.vic.gov.au
cesar.melhem@parliament.vic.gov.au
danny.obrien@parliament.vic.gov.au
jeff.bourman@parliament.vic.gov.au
natalie.suleyman@parliament.vic.gov.au
jaclyn.symes@parliament.vic.gov.au
fiona.patten@parliament.vic.gov.au
melina.bath@parliament.vic.gov.au
roma.britnell@parliament.vic.gov.au
richard.riordan@parliament.vic.gov.au
MengHeang.Tak@parliament.vic.gov.au
Katie.Hall@parliament.vic.gov.au
Sarah.Connolly@parliament.vic.gov.au
Melissa.Horne@parliament.vic.gov.au
Pauline.Richards@parliament.vic.gov.au
James.Newbury@parliament.vic.gov.au
Kat.Theophanous@parliament.vic.gov.au
Chris.Brayne@parliament.vic.gov.au
Will.Fowles@parliament.vic.gov.au
Bridget.Vallence@parliament.vic.gov.au
Brad.Rowswell@parliament.vic.gov.au
Matt.Fregon@parliament.vic.gov.au
Paul.Hamer@parliament.vic.gov.au
John.Kennedy@parliament.vic.gov.au
Dustin.Halse@parliament.vic.gov.au
Michaela.Settle@parliament.vic.gov.au
Tim.Read@parliament.vic.gov.au
Juliana.Addison@parliament.vic.gov.au
Jordan.Crugnale@parliament.vic.gov.au
Jackson.Taylor@parliament.vic.gov.au
Gary.Maas@parliament.vic.gov.au
Stephen.McGhie@parliament.vic.gov.au
Ali.Cupper@parliament.vic.gov.au
Stuart.Grimley@parliament.vic.gov.au
Tania.Maxwell@parliament.vic.gov.au
Tien.
Kieu@parliament.vic.gov.au
Ingrid.Stitt@parliament.vic.gov.au
Catherine.Cumming@parliament.vic.gov.au
Sonja.Terpstra@parliament.vic.gov.au
Kaushaliya.Vaghela@parliament.vic.gov.au
Rodney.Barton@parliament.vic.gov.au
Tim.Quilty@parliament.vic.gov.au
David.Limbrick@parliament.vic.gov.au
Nina.Taylor@parliament.vic.gov.au
Clifford.Hayes@parliament.vic.gov.au
Andy.Meddick@parliament.vic.gov.au
enver.erdogan@parliament.vic.gov.au
matthew.bach@parliament.vic.gov.au
Beverley.McArthur@parliament.vic.gov.au
lee.tarlamis@parliament.vic.gov.au
kim.wells@parliament.vic.gov.au
ros.spence@parliament.vic.gov.au
richard.wynne@parliament.vic.gov.au
Darren.chester@parliament.vic.gov.au


australiannationalreview--2020-08-25--Premier Daniel Andrews says Victoria’s State of Emergency will be extended to 18 MONTHS and strict l

Premier Daniel Andrews says Victoria ’ s State of Emergency will be extended to 18 MONTHS and strict lockdown will continue in September after another 15 coronavirus deaths overnight Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has announced the State of Emergency will be in place for 18 months and lockdown restrictions will be extended beyond September .
This is despite the state recording its lowest rise in COVID-19 infections in seven weeks with 116 new cases and 15 additional deaths on Monday .
Mr Andrews said the state could not afford to lower the restrictions , and would extend the State of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ giving the government the power to impose further lockdown restrictions .
‘ It is not an unlimited extension , it is nothing more than a recognition that this virus won ’ t be over on September 30 , ’ the premier said .
‘ I would love nothing more for there to be no need for any rules on September 14 , but I don ’ t think that is the reality.
’ While the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 only allows a State of Emergency to operate for six months , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to change it .
This is to ensure restrictions such as mandatory masks and the strict lockdown can continue to be implemented throughout the state .
‘ That is the legal instrument that allows rules about face masks , about COVID safe work plans in workplaces large and small , that is the legal instrument that sits behind density limits in pubs and cafes and restaurants , ’ he said .
‘ Things like a positive person , someone who has got this virus , and required to isolate at home.
’ ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provisions within the public health and well-being act for a maximum of a further 12 months.
’ Mr Andrews said the decision to ask parliament to extend the restrictions was about ‘ protecting everyone ’ in Victoria .
‘ They will need to be in place after September 13 .
I wish that wasn ’ t the case .
Even if there had not been a second wave these rules would still need to be in place , ’ he said .
‘ Because there is not a jurisdiction in the world that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to absolute normal , where there are no limits on restaurants , no limits in cafes , no masks at all , no need to isolate if you ’ ve actually got this.
’ ‘ All of those very commonsense provisions they need when you ’ re beyond the 13 September .
The law doesn ’ t quite provide for that .
We want to make a change.
’ If there is no vaccine within 12 months , the state ’ s restrictions may have to be extended again .
‘ We would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where we would have to go back to the Parliament .
No-one is asking for an unlimited five years , 10 years , run forever .
12 months we think is appropriate .
That is to say it is foreseeable , ’ he said .
‘ I hope we are wrong in predicting this will still need rules in 12 months .
Hopefully we have got a vaccine by then .
‘ But even then , the vaccine will take time to develop , manufacture , administer , and the efficacy of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that , does it protect you for three months , six months , here , forever , the whole notion of boosters , those sorts of things .
‘ So this is nothing more or less than a logical extension in time , changing the law of the state to ensure it is equal to the challenge of state faces.
’ The embattled state recorded its lowest amount of new COVID-19 cases on Monday since July 5 , when 67 people were diagnosed .
The latest fatalities bring the state ’ s COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ figure to 517 .
The number of new cases is almost half Sunday ’ s figure of 208 .

Premier Daniel Andrews says Victoria’s State of Emergency will be extended to 18 MONTHS and strict lockdown will continue in September after another 15 coronavirus deaths overnight
By LAUREN FERRI and CHARLIE MOORE
Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has announced the State of Emergency will be in place for 18 months and lockdown restrictions will be extended beyond September.
This is despite the state recording its lowest rise in COVID-19 infections in seven weeks with 116 new cases and 15 additional deaths on Monday.
Mr Andrews said the state could not afford to lower the restrictions, and would extend the State of Emergency to 18 months in September, giving the government the power to impose further lockdown restrictions.
‘It is not an unlimited extension, it is nothing more than a recognition that this virus won’t be over on September 30,’ the premier said.
‘I would love nothing more for there to be no need for any rules on September 14, but I don’t think that is the reality.’
While the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 only allows a State of Emergency to operate for six months, the premier said amendments are being made to change it.
This is to ensure restrictions such as mandatory masks and the strict lockdown can continue to be implemented throughout the state.
Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has announced that the State of Emergency will be in place for 18 months and lockdown restrictions will be extended beyond September
While the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 only allows a State of Emergency to operate for six months, the premier said amendments are being made to change it.
Victoria reported its lowest rise in COVID-19 infections in seven weeks with 116 new cases and 15 additional fatalities on Monday.
Mr Andrews said the state could not afford to lower the restrictions, and would extend the State of Emergency to 18 months in September.
‘That is the legal instrument that allows rules about face masks, about COVID safe work plans in workplaces large and small, that is the legal instrument that sits behind density limits in pubs and cafes and restaurants,’ he said.
‘Things like a positive person, someone who has got this virus, and required to isolate at home.’
‘We will extend the state of emergency provisions within the public health and well-being act for a maximum of a further 12 months.’
Mr Andrews said the decision to ask parliament to extend the restrictions was about ‘protecting everyone’ in Victoria.
‘They will need to be in place after September 13. I wish that wasn’t the case. Even if there had not been a second wave these rules would still need to be in place,’ he said.
‘Because there is not a jurisdiction in the world that is going to just be going back to absolute normal, where there are no limits on restaurants, no limits in cafes, no masks at all, no need to isolate if you’ve actually got this.’
‘All of those very commonsense provisions they need when you’re beyond the 13 September. The law doesn’t quite provide for that. We want to make a change.’
If there is no vaccine within 12 months, the state’s restrictions may have to be extended again.
Medical staff conduct a COVID-19 test on a patient at the drive through coronavirus testing facility in Ballarat on Friday
It comes as halfway through lockdown, Victoria’s chief health officer Brett Sutton has defiantly declared he won’t let the state’s hard-fought COVID-19 gains slip
‘We would be in a similar position to now where we would have to go back to the Parliament. No-one is asking for an unlimited five years, 10 years, run forever. 12 months we think is appropriate. That is to say it is foreseeable,’ he said.
‘I hope we are wrong in predicting this will still need rules in 12 months. Hopefully we have got a vaccine by then.
‘But even then, the vaccine will take time to develop, manufacture, administer, and the efficacy of the vaccine, what is the life-cycle of that, does it protect you for three months, six months, here, forever, the whole notion of boosters, those sorts of things.
‘So this is nothing more or less than a logical extension in time, changing the law of the state to ensure it is equal to the challenge of state faces.’
The embattled state recorded its lowest amount of new COVID-19 cases on Monday since July 5, when 67 people were diagnosed.
The latest fatalities bring the state’s COVID-19 death toll to 430 and the national figure to 517.
The number of new cases is almost half Sunday’s figure of 208.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-27--Still, no journalists or politicians have taken up $1 million challenge to simply show independent p

Still , no journalists or politicians have taken up $ 1 million challenge to simply show independent proof the Covid @ @ @ @ @ .
Still , no journalists or politicians have taken up my $ 1 million challenge @ @ @ @ @ the Covid deaths aren ’ t inflated .
Even the Victorian Health Minister admitted they @ @ @ @ @ clearly a politicised virus and a falsified pandemic being used to push agendas you and @ @ @ @ @ .
And you have every reason to be concerned about their lack of transparency .
@ @ @ @ @ news about me from years ago after I Founded the Australian National Review to expose @ @ @ @ @ 21st Century Australia Political Party both in 2013 , which they ( political factions and @ @ @ @ @ me to destroy my companies , funding and character assassinate me .
That showed me @ @ @ @ @ in Australia and Globally .

Still, no journalists or politicians have taken up $1 million challenge to simply show independent proof the Covid deaths aren’t inflated.
By Jamie McIntyre
Still, no journalists or politicians have taken up my $1 million challenge to simply show independent proof the Covid deaths aren’t inflated. Even the Victorian Health Minister admitted they are.
It’s clearly a politicised virus and a falsified pandemic being used to push agendas you and I would never support otherwise. And you have every reason to be concerned about their lack of transparency.
They also raise more fake news about me from years ago after I Founded the Australian National Review to expose their corruption, and the 21st Century Australia Political Party both in 2013, which they (political factions and Govt agencies) went after me to destroy my companies, funding and character assassinate me.
That showed me just how corrupt politics is in Australia and Globally.
Support independent news at www.australiannationalreview.com
Original source: https://www.facebook.com/100001092086344/posts/3325800240799679/


australiannationalreview--2020-08-27--A Handbook for Paedophiles goes online

A Handbook for Paedophiles goes online

The release of a Handbook for Paedophiles online , should be a serious cause for concern for parents .
This is not the first type of publication to be made available on the internet .
However , previous publications were generally only available to members of the paedophile community .
Those who mainly operated on the Dark Net or Deep Web .
Having such a document so freely available online , has led to fears it now may be used as a tool .
One to assist paedophiles everywhere to sexually abuse and exploit children , without having to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The guide is both expansive and comprehensive at 170 pages .
It has allegedly been complied by those with an interest in having sexual relationships with children , a Doctor and a Psychologist .
In its introduction it states .
“ This is an education and a step by step guide for adults to engage and practice sexual relationships with underage children .
The purpose of this guide is to teach adults how to safely and harmlessly practice sex with children , without hurting the child , by using advanced and well researched @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alleged psychologist.
” It goes on .
“ By using advanced child psychology and in depth research , we have managed to crack the code and are therefore able to give any adult the great opportunity of enjoying sexual relationships with children without the fear of doing harm .
This does also mean that we are able to give the children this just as great opportunity to both learn and enjoy sexual relationships with adults .
Look at this guide as an education – when you are educated , you can start practicing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this document is possibly timed and intentional .
Child sexual abusers are attempting to rebrand paedophilia , as an alternative sexual preference .
These initiatives in combination make their intention quite clear .
Something that has long existed in the shadows , is now attempting to stake its claim , this is acceptable human behaviour .
A monstrosity is now actively seeking to walk among us .
Justified in doing so by the safety in numbers that the online world has afforded .
This document is truly terrifying .
There is a twisted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with the recommended minimum age of sexual activity being two .
A two year old child , a baby in fact .
This has been deemed the suitable age of a child , for a paedophile to begin a sexual relationship with .
Seeing content like this in black and white , along with the justifications that are offered are sickening .
That any individual would even try attempt to intellectualise these actions , makes you realise these are considerably disturbed people .
It ’ s not just the recommended age for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is plenty of encouragement for mothers and fathers to incestualise their relationship with their children .
However this particular group of paedophiles appear to favour heterosexual , rather than homosexual interaction with children .
They go so far as to cast their lot against such action as being immoral .
Advice is afforded on every possible topic a paedophile might need .
How to first make an approach and introduction to a child .
The techniques used to develop and build a relationship .
What to do when you explore a child ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ child to explore the sexual predator ’ s genitals .
There are techniques on how to get access to a child through single parents .
It is recommended single parents who are unattractive , or fat are the best option .
These individuals will be lonely , have a lower self-esteem , and will be grateful of the attention .
They are also less likely to end a relationship , even if the abuse is discovered according to the handbook .
A relationship with a single parent can be used to hide in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexually abused in their own home .
The children of single parents , those from broken homes , or those from a poorer socioeconomic background are considered the lowest hanging fruit .
These children will actively seek out a strong parental role , something that might be absent in their lives .
This makes them more vulnerable prone to manipulation .
Therefore easier to build a strong relationship with , by offering something children believe is absent from their lives .
This narrows the range of children sexual predator has to approach , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Advice is offered on how to get access to children through extended family without raising suspicion .
Even making an effort to babysit children and the advantages this offers , having time to sexually abuse a child , makes you realise how genuinely vulnerable children are .
Yet the document does not end there .
How to become involved with children in a day care environment , in schools , sporting clubs , or even in the outdoors .
This show the lengths paedophiles will go to get access to a child .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ sentiment , the love between an adult and a child is as real , as that between an adult and another adult .
Bold abhorrent statements are made , that children are sexually available .
They are sexual creatures , who crave the same sexual experiences as adults .
There is even an example of a male paedophile sexually abusing a child using each of the specific methods set out in the document .
An example of how any want to be child lover should behave and engage with children in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jumps out , is how much paedophiles depend and rely on creating a world of utter secrecy with the child .
They need to bring the child to a place psychologically , where the child believes the relationship is something special and magical .
Something nobody other than the abuser and the victim will only ever be ever to understand .
The manipulation of a child is broken down in to a simple step by step process .
Each step along the way is tactical grooming .
Each step builds on the last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inhibitions and promote more trust between the abuser and victim .
Throughout , the need to ensure the child ’ s silence and secrecy is imperative .
Code words are even used in the event that the child attempts to explain what has happened to them .
Leaving parents confused and not fully understanding what the child is attempting to say .
This is only a brief outline of what paedophiles are sharing with each other in this one document .
Terms such as ‘ Child Love ’ and ‘ Minor Attracted Persons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to give serious consideration to .
Attempts to get access to children online and off , have a very clear and successful methodology .
This guide , while abhorrent gives an insight in to the mind of a paedophile .
It clearly shows a complete disconnect between their drive to engage in the sexual abuse and exploitation of children , and the life-long harm it causes .
It is estimated that one in every four children are victims of child sexual abuse .
That ’ s a considerable amount of children .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ further exasperate that statistic .
Unfortunately , it can take up to 22 years for a victim of child sexual abuse to come forward .
We need to ensure we do everything possible to protect children from being exposed to a paedophile in the real , or online world .
Online sexual predators have taken advantage of COVID19 .
We know that there here has been an explosion in the number of children targeted online .
How bad of an attack will only be identified in time to come .
From the level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
From the attempts to rebrand paedophilia as an alternative sexual preference , it is evident that there is a high level of organisation .
Children are genuinely at serious risk of harm online , if we can ’ t get parents on board with us .
Children can ’ t be expected to have the ability to deal with this danger alone .
This whole guidebook sets out in detail , how easy it is for a paedophile to turn a child , in their favour .
It shows how unprepared children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the child believes is absent from their own lives .
The internet has afforded online sexual predators an advantage .
It favours them , through the unlimited access to children .
Predators can hide in the darkness of anonymity .
Can pretend to be who they are not .
They can profile a child to assess their weakness .
Have the ability to identify whether a parent is active in the child ’ s life .
It ’ s is known they also to conduct a risk assessment to see if they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advantages over a child and parent .
However , parents have the means and methods to protect their children .
But parents have to consciously decide to make an effort .
Not a half-hearted attempt .
Parents need to be vigilant and fully cognisant that there is a very high chance that an online sexual predator will at some point make contact with their child .
In fact , there is every likelihood that multiple online sexual predators will make contact with them .
Unless you are part of your child ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , such as monitoring and restrictions are in place , then they are at risk .
The images of the children were taken from the handbook .
If you recognise any of these children please contact your local police authority immediately .
There is every possibility that these children themselves may be victims of a sexual predator .
Their safety should be a priority for us all .
Hopefully , somebody will recognise them .
Finally , we would ask all parents to step up and do everything you possibly can to protect @ @ @ @

A Handbook for Paedophiles goes online.
By Child Protection Party
The release of a Handbook for Paedophiles online, should be a serious cause for concern for parents. This is not the first type of publication to be made available on the internet. However, previous publications were generally only available to members of the paedophile community. Those who mainly operated on the Dark Net or Deep Web. Having such a document so freely available online, has led to fears it now may be used as a tool. One to assist paedophiles everywhere to sexually abuse and exploit children, without having to be part of an online paedophile community.
The guide is both expansive and comprehensive at 170 pages. It has allegedly been complied by those with an interest in having sexual relationships with children, a Doctor and a Psychologist. In its introduction it states. “This is an education and a step by step guide for adults to engage and practice sexual relationships with underage children. The purpose of this guide is to teach adults how to safely and harmlessly practice sex with children, without hurting the child, by using advanced and well researched child psychology and pedagogy authored by an alleged psychologist.”
In Depth Research
It goes on. “By using advanced child psychology and in depth research, we have managed to crack the code and are therefore able to give any adult the great opportunity of enjoying sexual relationships with children without the fear of doing harm. This does also mean that we are able to give the children this just as great opportunity to both learn and enjoy sexual relationships with adults. Look at this guide as an education – when you are educated, you can start practicing sex with children.”
The release of this document is possibly timed and intentional. Child sexual abusers are attempting to rebrand paedophilia, as an alternative sexual preference. These initiatives in combination make their intention quite clear. Something that has long existed in the shadows, is now attempting to stake its claim, this is acceptable human behaviour. A monstrosity is now actively seeking to walk among us. Justified in doing so by the safety in numbers that the online world has afforded.
Truly Terrifying
This document is truly terrifying. There is a twisted display for the welfare of a child, with the recommended minimum age of sexual activity being two. A two year old child, a baby in fact. This has been deemed the suitable age of a child, for a paedophile to begin a sexual relationship with. Seeing content like this in black and white, along with the justifications that are offered are sickening. That any individual would even try attempt to intellectualise these actions, makes you realise these are considerably disturbed people.
It’s not just the recommended age for sexual activity that is breath-taking. There is plenty of encouragement for mothers and fathers to incestualise their relationship with their children. However this particular group of paedophiles appear to favour heterosexual, rather than homosexual interaction with children. They go so far as to cast their lot against such action as being immoral.
Advice for Paedophiles on touching children
Advice is afforded on every possible topic a paedophile might need. How to first make an approach and introduction to a child. The techniques used to develop and build a relationship. What to do when you explore a child’s genitals. How to teach a child to explore the sexual predator’s genitals. There are techniques on how to get access to a child through single parents. It is recommended single parents who are unattractive, or fat are the best option. These individuals will be lonely, have a lower self-esteem, and will be grateful of the attention. They are also less likely to end a relationship, even if the abuse is discovered according to the handbook. A relationship with a single parent can be used to hide in plain sight. While the children are sexually abused in their own home.
Single Parents Targeted
The children of single parents, those from broken homes, or those from a poorer socioeconomic background are considered the lowest hanging fruit. These children will actively seek out a strong parental role, something that might be absent in their lives. This makes them more vulnerable prone to manipulation. Therefore easier to build a strong relationship with, by offering something children believe is absent from their lives. This narrows the range of children sexual predator has to approach, which gives them a voracious advantage.
Advice is offered on how to get access to children through extended family without raising suspicion. Even making an effort to babysit children and the advantages this offers, having time to sexually abuse a child, makes you realise how genuinely vulnerable children are. Yet the document does not end there. How to become involved with children in a day care environment, in schools, sporting clubs, or even in the outdoors. This show the lengths paedophiles will go to get access to a child. All of this is justified by the sentiment, the love between an adult and a child is as real, as that between an adult and another adult.
Children are Sexual Creatures
Bold abhorrent statements are made, that children are sexually available. They are sexual creatures, who crave the same sexual experiences as adults. There is even an example of a male paedophile sexually abusing a child using each of the specific methods set out in the document. An example of how any want to be child lover should behave and engage with children in order to get a successful outcome.
Secrecy
What immediately jumps out, is how much paedophiles depend and rely on creating a world of utter secrecy with the child. They need to bring the child to a place psychologically, where the child believes the relationship is something special and magical. Something nobody other than the abuser and the victim will only ever be ever to understand. The manipulation of a child is broken down in to a simple step by step process.
Each step along the way is tactical grooming. Each step builds on the last to break down the child’s inhibitions and promote more trust between the abuser and victim. Throughout, the need to ensure the child’s silence and secrecy is imperative. Code words are even used in the event that the child attempts to explain what has happened to them. Leaving parents confused and not fully understanding what the child is attempting to say.
Child Love
This is only a brief outline of what paedophiles are sharing with each other in this one document. Terms such as ‘Child Love’ and ‘Minor Attracted Persons’, are something we all need to give serious consideration to. Attempts to get access to children online and off, have a very clear and successful methodology. This guide, while abhorrent gives an insight in to the mind of a paedophile. It clearly shows a complete disconnect between their drive to engage in the sexual abuse and exploitation of children, and the life-long harm it causes.
It is estimated that one in every four children are victims of child sexual abuse. That’s a considerable amount of children. The online world has provided a means to further exasperate that statistic. Unfortunately, it can take up to 22 years for a victim of child sexual abuse to come forward. We need to ensure we do everything possible to protect children from being exposed to a paedophile in the real, or online world. Online sexual predators have taken advantage of COVID19. We know that there here has been an explosion in the number of children targeted online. How bad of an attack will only be identified in time to come.
Highly Organised
From the level of insight afforded by their own literature. From the attempts to rebrand paedophilia as an alternative sexual preference, it is evident that there is a high level of organisation. Children are genuinely at serious risk of harm online, if we can’t get parents on board with us. Children can’t be expected to have the ability to deal with this danger alone. This whole guidebook sets out in detail, how easy it is for a paedophile to turn a child, in their favour. It shows how unprepared children are when a sexual predator, offers what the child believes is absent from their own lives.
The internet has afforded online sexual predators an advantage. It favours them, through the unlimited access to children. Predators can hide in the darkness of anonymity. Can pretend to be who they are not. They can profile a child to assess their weakness. Have the ability to identify whether a parent is active in the child’s life. It’s is known they also to conduct a risk assessment to see if they will get caught. These are significant advantages over a child and parent.
Parents must protect their children
However, parents have the means and methods to protect their children. But parents have to consciously decide to make an effort. Not a half-hearted attempt. Parents need to be vigilant and fully cognisant that there is a very high chance that an online sexual predator will at some point make contact with their child. In fact, there is every likelihood that multiple online sexual predators will make contact with them. Unless you are part of your child’s online life, have ensured every precaution, such as monitoring and restrictions are in place, then they are at risk.
The images of the children were taken from the handbook. If you recognise any of these children please contact your local police authority immediately. There is every possibility that these children themselves may be victims of a sexual predator. Their safety should be a priority for us all. Hopefully, somebody will recognise them. Finally, we would ask all parents to step up and do everything you possibly can to protect your children online.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-27--Coronavirus: Face masks could increase risk of infection, medical chief warns

Members of the public could be putting themselves more at risk from contracting coronavirus by wearing face masks , one of England ’ s most senior doctors has warned .
Jenny Harries , deputy chief medical officer , said the masks could “ actually trap the virus ” and cause the person wearing it to breathe it in .
“ For the average member of the public walking down a street , it is not a good idea ” to wear a face mask in the hope of preventing infection , she added .
Sales of the masks have sky-rocketed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ retailers including Boots and Amazon selling out of the products before the virus had even taken hold in the UK .
“ Or they will be out and they haven ’ t washed their hands , they will have a cup of coffee somewhere , they half hook it off , they wipe something over it .
“ In fact , you can actually trap the virus in the mask and start breathing it in.
” Asked if people are putting themselves more at risk by wearing masks , Dr Harries added : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people can adversely put themselves at more risk than less.
” Asked about their effectiveness , Dr Harries told BBC News : “ What tends to happen is people will have one mask .
They won ’ t wear it all the time , they will take it off when they get home , they will put it down on a surface they haven ’ t cleaned .
However , she said those who are advised to wear one by healthcare workers should follow their guidance .
Demand for face masks in China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exceeded 200 million a day in January , prompting manufacturers to cancel staff leave and increase wages to ramp up production .
But Jake Dunning , head of emerging infections and zoonoses [ infectious disease spread between humans and animals ] at Public Health England , told The Independent there was “ very little evidence of a widespread benefit ” from wearing them .
“ Face masks must be worn correctly , changed frequently , removed properly , disposed of safely and used in combination with good universal hygiene behaviour in order for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ added .

Coronavirus: Face masks could increase risk of infection, medical chief warns.
By Chris Baynes
Members of the public could be putting themselves more at risk from contracting coronavirus by wearing face masks, one of England’s most senior doctors has warned.
Jenny Harries, deputy chief medical officer, said the masks could “actually trap the virus” and cause the person wearing it to breathe it in.
“For the average member of the public walking down a street, it is not a good idea” to wear a face mask in the hope of preventing infection, she added.
Sales of the masks have sky-rocketed since the Covid-19 outbreak began, with retailers including Boots and Amazon selling out of the products before the virus had even taken hold in the UK.
“Or they will be out and they haven’t washed their hands, they will have a cup of coffee somewhere, they half hook it off, they wipe something over it.
“In fact, you can actually trap the virus in the mask and start breathing it in.”
Asked if people are putting themselves more at risk by wearing masks, Dr Harries added: “Because of these behavioural issues, people can adversely put themselves at more risk than less.”
Asked about their effectiveness, Dr Harries told BBC News: “What tends to happen is people will have one mask. They won’t wear it all the time, they will take it off when they get home, they will put it down on a surface they haven’t cleaned.
However, she said those who are advised to wear one by healthcare workers should follow their guidance.
Demand for face masks in China, where the coronavirus outbreak began, exceeded 200 million a day in January, prompting manufacturers to cancel staff leave and increase wages to ramp up production.
But Jake Dunning, head of emerging infections and zoonoses [infectious disease spread between humans and animals] at Public Health England, told The Independent there was “very little evidence of a widespread benefit” from wearing them.
“Face masks must be worn correctly, changed frequently, removed properly, disposed of safely and used in combination with good universal hygiene behaviour in order for them to be effective,” he added.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-27--Melbourne making International news over its “police state”