australiannationalreview--2020-05-02--COVID-19 Coronavirus: A Fake Pandemic? Who’s Behind It? Global Economic, Social and Geopolitical Des

COVID-19 Coronavirus: A Fake Pandemic? Who’s Behind It? Global Economic, Social and Geopolitical Destabilization

The media hype and disinformation campaign regarding the spread of the COVID-19 novel coronavirus have created a Worldwide atmosphere of fear and uncertainty following the launching of a global public health emergency by the WHO on January 30th .
The fear campaign is ongoing .
Panic and uncertainty .
National governments and the WHO are misleading the public .
“ About 84,000 people in at least 56 countries have been infected , and about 2,900 have died ” says the New York Times .
What they fail to mention is that 98 % of those cases of infection are in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5000 confirmed cases outside China .
( WHO , February 28 , 2020 ) While COVID-19 is a matter of Public Health concern , at the moment , there is no real pandemic outside Mainland China .
Look at the figures .
At the time of writing , the number of “ confirmed cases ” in the US was 64 .
A low number and the media is spreading panic .
Meanwhile , there are 15 Million Cases of Influenza in the USA .
The WHO has also reported 2,791 deaths of which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These figures confirm that the pandemic is largely limited to Mainland China .
Moreover , recent data suggests that the epidemic in China is firmly under control .
On February 21 , 2020 , China ’ s National Health Commission reported that 36.157 patients were designated as cured and discharged from hospital .
( see graph below ) .
Chinese reports confirm that people have received treatment and are recovering from the virus infection .
Concurrently , the number of infected patients is declining .
According to the National Medical Products Administration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , an anti-viral drug , “ as a treatment for coronavirus with minimal side effects ” .
The World Population is of the order of 7.8 billion .
The population of China is of the order of 1.4 billion .
The World population minus China is of the order of 6.4 billion .
4691 confirmed cases and 67 reported deaths ( outside China ) out of a population of 6.4 billion does not constitute a pandemic .
4691/6,4oo , ooo , ooo =0.00000073 = 0.000073 % 64 cases in the US which has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a pandemic .
( Feb 28 data ) : 64/330,000,000 = 0.00000019 = 0.000019 % Why the Propaganda ?
Racism directed against Ethnic Chinese A campaign against China was launched , a wave of racist sentiment against ethnic Chinese is ongoing largely led by the Western media .
And this phenomenon is happening all over the U.S .
US strategies consist in using COVID-19 to isolate China , despite the fact that the US economy is heavily dependent upon Chinese imports .
The short-term disruption of the Chinese economy is largely attributable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the channels of trade and transportation .
The WHO Global Public Health emergency is coupled with media disinformation and the freezing of air travel to China .
Spearheaded by media disinformation , there is another dimension .
Panic in the stock markets .
The Coronavirus fear has triggered the drop of financial markets Worldwide .
According to reports , roughly $ 6 trillion have been wiped off the value of stock markets Worldwide .
The decline in stock market values so far is of the order of “ 15 percent or more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( e.g .
of average Americans ) have occurred not to mention corporate failures and bankruptcies .
It ’ s a bonanza for institutional speculators including corporate hedge funds .
The financial meltdown has led to sizeable transfers of money wealth into the pockets of a handful of financial institutions .
In a bitter irony , analysts in chorus have casually linked the market collapse to the escalation of the coronavirus at a time when there was less than 64 confirmed cases in the US .
Was it Possible to “ Predict ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be naive to believe that the financial crisis was solely the consequence of spontaneous market forces , responding to the COVID-19 outbreak .
The market was carefully manipulated by powerful actors using speculative instruments in the market for derivatives , including “ short-selling ” .
Media disinformation on the “ escalation of the COVID-19 pandemic certainly played a role .
The unspoken objective is the concentration of Wealth .
It was a financial bonanza for those who had “ inside information ” or “ foreknowledge ” leading up to the WHO ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on January 30 .
Was there Foreknowledge of the COVID-19 ( nCoV-2019 ) Pandemic ?
And of its Likely impacts ?
On October 18 , 2019 , the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security , Baltimore undertook a carefully designed simulation of a coronavirus epidemic entitled nCoV-2019 .
In the Event 201 Simulation of a Coronavirus Pandemic , a 15 % collapse of financial markets had been “ simulated ” .
It was not “ predicted ” according to the organizers and sponsors of the event , which included the Bill and Melinda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Forum .
Corruption and The Role of the WHO And what motivated WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to declare the coronavirus nCoV-2019 as a “ Public Health Emergency of International Concern ( PHEIC ) ” on January 30 when the epidemic was largely confined to Mainland China ?
The evidence suggests that WHO Director-General Tedros was serving the interests of powerful corporate sponsors .
Together with the Davos World Economic Forum ( WEF ) The Gates Foundation were the sponsors of the October John Hopkins 2019 nCoV-2019 “ simulation exercise ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also chair the Global Fund to Fight AIDS , Tuberculosis and Malaria that was co-founded by the Gates Foundation .
The Global Fund has been riddled with fraud and corruption scandals .
A massive vaccine campaign has been ordered by the Director General of the WHO Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus .
Numerous pharmaceutical companies are already working on the development of a vaccine .
In this regard , it is worth recalling the WHO scam during the mandate of his predecessor Dr. Margaret Chan , who stated in relation to the 2009 H1N1 Swine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ H1N1 pandemic in 2009 .
It was a money making scam as revealed by the European Parliament .
What ’ s the Next Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic ?
Is it Fake or is it Real ?
• The propaganda campaign against China is not over .
• Neither is the “ fear pandemic ” outside China despite the exceedingly low number of “ confirmed cases ” .
• The financial crisis is ongoing , supported by media disinformation and financial meddling .
• If normal US-China trade ( and transportation ) relations fail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ Made in China ” consumer goods exported to America could be affected .
• This in turn could potentially trigger a major crisis in retail trade in the US , i.e “ Made in China ” commodities constitute a large share of monthly household consumption .
• From a public health point of view , there are favorable prospects for eliminating the COVID-19 in China .
Progress has already been reported .
• For the rest of the World ( which currently has approximately 3000 confirmed cases , 28 February 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with propaganda in favor of a Worldwide vaccination program .
• Without a fear campaign coupled with fake news , the incidence of COVID-19 would not have made the headlines .
• 43.3 percent of the “ confirmed cases ” in China are now categorized as “ recovered ” ( See graph above ) .
Western reports do not make the distinction between “ confirmed cases ” and “ confirmed infected cases ” .
It is the latter which is relevant .
The trend is towards recovery and decline of the “ confirmed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccination campaign ( referred to above ) was duly confirmed by Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on February 28 : Needless to say this WHO decision is another financial windfall for the Big Five Vaccine producers : GlaxoSmithKline , Novartis , Merck & Co. , Sanofi , Pfizer , which control 85 % of the vaccine market .
According to CNBC : ( emphasis added ) These companies have jumped into the race to combat the deadly coronavirus , working on vaccine or drug programs .
… Sanofi is teaming up with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the new virus , hoping its work on the 2003 SARS outbreak could speed up the process .
Merck ’ s vaccine business generated $ 8.4 billion of revenues in 2019 , the segment has been growing at an annual rate of 9 % since 2010 , according to Bernstein .
GlaxoSmithKline said this month it is partnering with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations [ CEPI ] for a vaccine program .
… CEPI was founded at the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) in 2017 .
Of significance , CEPI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , the Wellcome Trust ( A British Multibillion Humanitarian Foundation ) , and the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) .
The governments of Norway and India are members , largely providing funding to CEPI .
October 18 , 2019 : The B. and M. Gates Foundation and the WEF were partners in the John Hopkins National Security October 2019 nCoV-2019 Pandemic “ Simulation Exercise ” .
December 31 , 2019 China alerted WHO to several cases of “ unusual pneumonia ” in Wuhan , Hubei province @ @ @ @ @ @ @ announced they had identified a new virus , The novel virus was named by the WHO 2019-nCoV ( exactly the same name as the virus pertaining to the John Hopkins simulation exercise , with the exception of the placement of the date ) .
January 24 , 25 , 2020 : Meeting at Davos , under the auspices of CEPI which is also a WEF-Gates partnership , the development of a 2019 nCoV vaccine was announced .
( 2 weeks after the January 7 , 2020 announcement , and barely a week prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Worldwide Public Health emergency ) .
January 30th , 2020 , WHO Director General announces the “ Public Health Emergency of International Concern ( PHEIC ) .
And now a Worldwide vaccination campaign has been launched to curb the COVID-19 under the auspices of CEPI in partnership with GlaxoSmithKline .
While COVID-19 ( alias nCoV-2019 ) constitutes a multi-billion corporate bonanza for Big Pharma , it has also contributed to precipitating humanity into a dangerous and unfolding global process of economic , social and geopolitical destabilization .

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
The media hype and disinformation campaign regarding the spread of the COVID-19 novel coronavirus have created a Worldwide atmosphere of fear and uncertainty following the launching of a global public health emergency by the WHO on January 30th.
The fear campaign is ongoing. Panic and uncertainty. National governments and the WHO are misleading the public.
“About 84,000 people in at least 56 countries have been infected, and about 2,900 have died” says the New York Times. What they fail to mention is that 98% of those cases of infection are in Mainland China. There are less than 5000 confirmed cases outside China. (WHO, February 28, 2020)
While COVID-19 is a matter of Public Health concern, at the moment, there is no real pandemic outside Mainland China. Look at the figures.
At the time of writing, the number of “confirmed cases” in the US was 64.
A low number and the media is spreading panic.
Meanwhile, there are 15 Million Cases of Influenza in the USA.
The latest FluView surveillance from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that as of January 18, 2020, there have been 15 million cases of flu, 140,000 hospitalizations, and 8200 deaths in the US this influenza season. (emphasis added)
Data on the COVID-19 pandemic:
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported on February 28, 2020 83,652 confirmed cases of COV-19 of which 78,961 are in Mainland China. Outside China, there are 4691 “confirmed cases” (WHO, February 28, 2020, See table on right).
The WHO has also reported 2,791 deaths of which only 67 have occurred outside Mainland China.
These figures confirm that the pandemic is largely limited to Mainland China.
Moreover, recent data suggests that the epidemic in China is firmly under control. On February 21, 2020, China’s National Health Commission reported that 36.157 patients were designated as cured and discharged from hospital. (see graph below).
Chinese reports confirm that people have received treatment and are recovering from the virus infection. Concurrently, the number of infected patients is declining.
According to the National Medical Products Administration of China, hospitals are using Favilavir, an anti-viral drug, “as a treatment for coronavirus with minimal side effects”.
.
Lets Crunch the Numbers
The World Population is of the order of 7.8 billion.
The population of China is of the order of 1.4 billion.
The World population minus China is of the order of 6.4 billion.
4691 confirmed cases and 67 reported deaths (outside China) out of a population of 6.4 billion does not constitute a pandemic. 4691/6,4oo,ooo,ooo =0.00000073 = 0.000073 %
64 cases in the US which has a population of approximately 330 million is not a pandemic. (Feb 28 data): 64/330,000,000 = 0.00000019 = 0.000019 %
Why the Propaganda? Racism directed against Ethnic Chinese
A campaign against China was launched, a wave of racist sentiment against ethnic Chinese is ongoing largely led by the Western media.
The Economist reports that “The coronavirus spreads racism against—and among—ethnic Chinese”
Fear of covid-19 makes people behave badly, including some Chinese “Britain’s Chinese community faces racism over coronavirus outbreak” according to the SCMP “Chinese communities overseas are increasingly facing racist abuse and discrimination amid the coronavirus outbreak. Some ethnic Chinese people living in the UK say they experienced growing hostility because of the deadly virus that originated in China.”
And this phenomenon is happening all over the U.S.
Economic Warfare against China
US strategies consist in using COVID-19 to isolate China, despite the fact that the US economy is heavily dependent upon Chinese imports.
The short-term disruption of the Chinese economy is largely attributable to the (temporary) closing down of the channels of trade and transportation.
The WHO Global Public Health emergency is coupled with media disinformation and the freezing of air travel to China.
Panic on Wall Street
Spearheaded by media disinformation, there is another dimension. Panic in the stock markets.
The Coronavirus fear has triggered the drop of financial markets Worldwide.
According to reports, roughly $6 trillion have been wiped off the value of stock markets Worldwide. The decline in stock market values so far is of the order of “15 percent or more”.
Massive losses of personal savings (e.g. of average Americans) have occurred not to mention corporate failures and bankruptcies.
It’s a bonanza for institutional speculators including corporate hedge funds. The financial meltdown has led to sizeable transfers of money wealth into the pockets of a handful of financial institutions.
In a bitter irony, analysts in chorus have casually linked the market collapse to the escalation of the coronavirus at a time when there was less than 64 confirmed cases in the US.
It’s not surprising that the market went down because … the virus has gotten so expanded. … ‘
Was it Possible to “Predict” the February Financial Crash?
It would be naive to believe that the financial crisis was solely the consequence of spontaneous market forces, responding to the COVID-19 outbreak. The market was carefully manipulated by powerful actors using speculative instruments in the market for derivatives, including “short-selling”. Media disinformation on the “escalation of the COVID-19 pandemic certainly played a role.
The unspoken objective is the concentration of Wealth. It was a financial bonanza for those who had “inside information” or “foreknowledge” leading up to the WHO’s decision to declare a Worldwide public emergency on January 30.
Was there Foreknowledge of the COVID-19 (nCoV-2019) Pandemic? And of its Likely impacts?
On October 18, 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, Baltimore undertook a carefully designed simulation of a coronavirus epidemic entitled nCoV-2019.
In the Event 201 Simulation of a Coronavirus Pandemic, a 15% collapse of financial markets had been “simulated”. It was not “predicted” according to the organizers and sponsors of the event, which included the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well the World Economic Forum.
.
Screenshot, 201 A Global Pandemic Exercise
Corruption and The Role of the WHO
And what motivated WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to declare the coronavirus nCoV-2019 as a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)” on January 30 when the epidemic was largely confined to Mainland China?
The evidence suggests that WHO Director-General Tedros was serving the interests of powerful corporate sponsors.
According to F. William Engdahl , Tedros had established a long lasting relationship with the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation. He had close ties to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Together with the Davos World Economic Forum (WEF) The Gates Foundation were the sponsors of the October John Hopkins 2019 nCoV-2019 “simulation exercise”.
As health minister, Tedros would also chair the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria that was co-founded by the Gates Foundation. The Global Fund has been riddled with fraud and corruption scandals.
A massive vaccine campaign has been ordered by the Director General of the WHO Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Numerous pharmaceutical companies are already working on the development of a vaccine.
In this regard, it is worth recalling the WHO scam during the mandate of his predecessor Dr. Margaret Chan, who stated in relation to the 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic that:
“Vaccine makers could produce 4.9 billion pandemic flu shots per year in the best-case scenario”,Margaret Chan, Director-General, World Health Organization (WHO), quoted by Reuters, 21 July 2009, emphasis added)
There was no H1N1 pandemic in 2009. It was a money making scam as revealed by the European Parliament.
What’s the Next Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic? Is it Fake or is it Real?
The propaganda campaign against China is not over.
Neither is the “fear pandemic” outside China despite the exceedingly low number of “confirmed cases”.
The financial crisis is ongoing, supported by media disinformation and financial meddling.
If normal US-China trade (and transportation) relations fail to be duly restored, the shipping of “Made in China” consumer goods exported to America could be affected.
This in turn could potentially trigger a major crisis in retail trade in the US, i.e “Made in China” commodities constitute a large share of monthly household consumption.
From a public health point of view, there are favorable prospects for eliminating the COVID-19 in China. Progress has already been reported.
For the rest of the World (which currently has approximately 3000 confirmed cases, 28 February 2020 ) the COVID-19 pandemic is ongoing coupled with propaganda in favor of a Worldwide vaccination program.
Without a fear campaign coupled with fake news, the incidence of COVID-19 would not have made the headlines.
From a health/medical standpoint is a Worldwide vaccination required?
43.3 percent of the “confirmed cases” in China are now categorized as “recovered” (See graph above). Western reports do not make the distinction between “confirmed cases” and “confirmed infected cases”. It is the latter which is relevant. The trend is towards recovery and decline of the “confirmed infected cases”.
The massive WHO vaccination campaign (referred to above) was duly confirmed by Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on February 28:
“…work is also progressing on vaccines and therapeutics. More than 20 vaccines are in development globally, and several therapeutics are in clinical trials. We expect the first results in a few weeks” (emphasis added)
Needless to say this WHO decision is another financial windfall for the Big Five Vaccine producers: GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck & Co., Sanofi, Pfizer, which control 85% of the vaccine market. According to CNBC: (emphasis added)
These companies have jumped into the race to combat the deadly coronavirus, working on vaccine or drug programs. … Sanofi is teaming up with the U.S. government to develop a vaccine for the new virus, hoping its work on the 2003 SARS outbreak could speed up the process. Merck’s vaccine business generated $8.4 billion of revenues in 2019, the segment has been growing at an annual rate of 9% since 2010, according to Bernstein. GlaxoSmithKline said this month it is partnering with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations [CEPI] for a vaccine program. … CEPI was founded at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2017. Of significance, CEPI was founded in Davos in 2017 by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust (A British Multibillion Humanitarian Foundation), and the World Economic Forum (WEF). The governments of Norway and India are members, largely providing funding to CEPI. Timeline October 18, 2019: The B. and M. Gates Foundation and the WEF were partners in the John Hopkins National Security October 2019 nCoV-2019 Pandemic “Simulation Exercise”. December 31, 2019 China alerted WHO to several cases of “unusual pneumonia” in Wuhan, Hubei province. January 7, 2020 Chinese officials announced they had identified a new virus, The novel virus was named by the WHO 2019-nCoV (exactly the same name as the virus pertaining to the John Hopkins simulation exercise, with the exception of the placement of the date). January 24, 25, 2020: Meeting at Davos, under the auspices of CEPI which is also a WEF-Gates partnership, the development of a 2019 nCoV vaccine was announced. (2 weeks after the January 7, 2020 announcement, and barely a week prior to the launching of the WHO’s Worldwide Public Health emergency). January 30th, 2020, WHO Director General announces the “Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). And now a Worldwide vaccination campaign has been launched to curb the COVID-19 under the auspices of CEPI in partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. Concluding Remarks
While COVID-19 (alias nCoV-2019) constitutes a multi-billion corporate bonanza for Big Pharma, it has also contributed to precipitating humanity into a dangerous and unfolding global process of economic, social and geopolitical destabilization.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-02--Fluoride—Drinking Ourselves to Death?

Fluoride—Drinking Ourselves to Death?

There ’ s nothing like a glass of cool , clear water to quench your thirst !
But the next time you turn on the tap , you might want to question whether that water is in fact , too toxic to drink .
If your water is fluoridated , the answer is likely yes .
For decades , we have been told a lie ; a lie that has led to the deaths of millions of Americans and weakened the immune system of tens of millions more .
THIS LIE IS CALLED FLUORIDATION : The process of dripping fluoride @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we were told was a safe and effective method of protecting our teeth from decay , but realistically , it is a deception of monumental proportions .
Remember the enormous Bárðarbunga volcanic eruption in Iceland in 2014-2015 ?
Animals in southern Iceland were at risk of fluoride poisoning if they inhaled or ingested the ash from the eruption .
Fluoride poisoning can lead to internal bleeding , long-term bone damage and tooth loss , according to BBC News ( April 19 , 2010 ) : Most folks never “ connect the dots ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to a natural event , and the intentional poisoning of human beings through accumulated fluoride toxicity from daily exposure .
In the USA , the practice of adding sodium fluoride to your tap water began in the 1940 ’ s , but this wasn ’ t the first time fluoride had been added to the water supply .
USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before the UN-American Activity committees of Congress in the 1950 ’ s that in his post as USA-Soviet liaison officer ( 1930 ’ s ) , the Soviets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the water supplies in their concentration camps , to make the prisoners stupid , docile , and subservient.
” But isn ’ t fluoride good for your teeth ?
Contrary to popular opinion , fluoride doesn ’ t stop tooth decay at all and scientific studies have actually proven that fluoride causes dental fluorosis , brain damage , birth defects , and osteoporosis .
If you use fluoridated toothpaste , check the warning label on the tube ; it will shock you .
The following warning is required an all fluoridated toothpaste @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to the large number of calls to the Poison Control Centers for children who became acutely ill from ingested sodium fluoride : WARNING : Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age .
In case of accidental overdose , seek professional assistance or contact a poison control center immediately .
In his book , Fluoride , The Aging Factor , Dr. John Yiamouyiannis warns : In 1977 , epidemiological studies by Dr. Dean Burk , former head of the US National Cancer Institute ’ s cell chemistry section , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to about 10,000 cancer deaths yearly .
In 2005 , a study conducted at the Harvard School of DENTAL HEALTH found that there is a direct correlation between fluoride and osteosarcoma ( bone cancer ) in young boys .
Sodium fluoride inhibits enzyme activity , paralyzes white blood cells , and causes collagen to break down .
Enzymes , the immune system , and collagen are all fundamental in fighting cancer .
All in all , there are more than 500 peer-reviewed studies documenting the adverse effects of sodium fluoride ranging from cancer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two separate stories from of India revealed that children are being blinded and crippled partly as a result of fluoride being artificially added to their drinking water .
In the Indian village of Gaudiyan , well over half of the population has bone deformities , making them physically handicapped .
Children are born normally but after they consume fluoridated water , they begin to develop crippling defects in their hands and feet .
However , in a supercilious manner that would make the Medical Mafia proud , Indian government doctors have denied that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the disabilities and have refused to test the water , insisting such tests are “ not necessary.
” Meanwhile , in the village of Pavagada , children are going blind after being diagnosed with Lamellar Congenital cataract ( a condition wherein the eye lenses are damaged ) .
The local doctors attribute the child blindness to two factors—consanguineous marriages and the “ fluoride content ” of the water .
LINK In the 1920 ’ s , aluminum manufacturing , due largely to the flourishing canning industry , was booming .
But it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ waste , namely sodium fluoride .
The biggest dilemma was the cost to safely dispose of this hazardous waste , since it was extremely expensive .
A company in Pittsburgh , ALCOA , led by their founder and major stockholder , Andrew Mellon , had some “ revolutionary ” ideas of how to cut the costs of disposing of sodium fluoride .
Under EPA regulations , sodium fluoride was previously required to be disposed of in a landfill for toxic waste .
However , Mellon got himself appointed Secretary of the Treasury which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US Public Health Services ( PHS ) , and to make a long story short , without any studies , Mellon found a market for his toxic waste ( and the toxic waste of the soon to emerge nuclear industry ) —the municipal water supplies of the USA .
Under Mellon ’ s supervision , ALCOA-funded scientist Gerald J. Cox publicly declared that fluoride was good for your teeth , and in 1939 , he proposed that the USA should fluoridate its water reservoirs .
In essence , sodium fluoride was given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
not by a doctor , not by a dentist , but by a scientist who was working for the largest producer of fluoride in the entire country .
I ’ m not joking , that ’ s how it all started !
At that time , the ADA and AMA were not yet on the take and they were screaming at Congress to stop this toxic assault .
The Journal of the American Dental Association , in 1936 warned that “ fluoride at the 1 ppm ( part per million ) concentration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” In the 1940 ’ s , countless studies proved conclusively that fluoride is toxic , causes cancer , damages the immune system , causes brain damage , and damages internal organs .
But ALCOA , backed by the Military Industrial Complex , wanted a market for the waste created by the nuclear industry , promptly “ classified ” the incriminating results of each and every study .
They were bound and determined to make a profit from this toxic substance called sodium fluoride .
In 1947 , Oscar R. Ewing , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Federal Security Agency , a position that placed him in charge of the PHS .
Under Ewing , a national water fluoridation campaign began .
The public relations strategist for the water fluoridation campaign was none other than Sigmund Freud ’ s nephew Edwin L. Bernays , known as the “ Father of Spin.
” Bernays pioneered the application of his uncle ’ s theories to advertising and government “ half truths.
” In his book , Propaganda , Bernays argued that “ scientific manipulation of public opinion is the key.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ small number of persons pull the wires which control the public mind.
” His techniques were simple : Pretend there is some favorable research by using phrases like “ Numerous studies have shown… ” or “ Research has proven… ” or “ Scientific investigators have found… ” but then never really cite anything .
Say it long enough and loud enough , and eventually people will believe it .
If anyone doubts you , attack their character and/or their intellect .
Bernays never strayed from his fundamental axiom to “ control the masses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the best “ PR ” occurs when the people are unaware that they are being manipulated .
So , under Bernays ’ spell , the popular image of fluoride ( which at the time was being sold as bug and rat poison ) became that of a beneficial provider of gleaming smiles , absolutely safe , and good for children .
Any opponents were quickly and permanently engraved on the public mind as crackpots , quacks , and lunatics .
In 1950 , the government officially endorsed fluoridation , and today , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s reservoirs are fluoridated with almost 150,000 tons of sodium fluoride each and every year , despite the fact that it is a toxic waste and causes countless health problems .
Truth be told , fluoride is a hazardous-waste by-product from aluminum , fertilizer , and the nuclear industries .
But rather than paying to dispose of their hazardous waste , these companies are able to sell their waste to municipalities so they can drip it into our water and forcibly “ mass-medicate ” the entire population !
I leave you with this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carton : Until next time , may God bless you all .
This article was originally published in April 2015 and has been updated in February 2020 .

By Ty Bollinger
There’s nothing like a glass of cool, clear water to quench your thirst! But the next time you turn on the tap, you might want to question whether that water is in fact, too toxic to drink. If your water is fluoridated, the answer is likely yes. For decades, we have been told a lie; a lie that has led to the deaths of millions of Americans and weakened the immune system of tens of millions more. THIS LIE IS CALLED FLUORIDATION: The process of dripping fluoride into our municipal water supplies, which we were told was a safe and effective method of protecting our teeth from decay, but realistically, it is a deception of monumental proportions.
Remember the enormous Bárðarbunga volcanic eruption in Iceland in 2014-2015? Animals in southern Iceland were at risk of fluoride poisoning if they inhaled or ingested the ash from the eruption. Fluoride poisoning can lead to internal bleeding, long-term bone damage and tooth loss, according to BBC News (April 19, 2010):
The fluoride in the ash creates acid in the animals’ stomachs, corroding the intestines resulting in hemorrhages. It also binds with calcium in the bloodstream and after heavy exposure over a period of days makes bones frail and causes teeth to crumble.
Most folks never “connect the dots” between the tragic poisoning of these animals due to a natural event, and the intentional poisoning of human beings through accumulated fluoride toxicity from daily exposure.
In the USA, the practice of adding sodium fluoride to your tap water began in the 1940’s, but this wasn’t the first time fluoride had been added to the water supply. USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before the UN-American Activity committees of Congress in the 1950’s that in his post as USA-Soviet liaison officer (1930’s), the Soviets openly admitted to “using the fluoride in the water supplies in their concentration camps, to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient.”
But isn’t fluoride good for your teeth? Contrary to popular opinion, fluoride doesn’t stop tooth decay at all and scientific studies have actually proven that fluoride causes dental fluorosis, brain damage, birth defects, and osteoporosis. If you use fluoridated toothpaste, check the warning label on the tube; it will shock you. The following warning is required an all fluoridated toothpaste by the FDA since April of 1997 due to the large number of calls to the Poison Control Centers for children who became acutely ill from ingested sodium fluoride:
WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. In case of accidental overdose, seek professional assistance or contact a poison control center immediately.
In his book, Fluoride, The Aging Factor, Dr. John Yiamouyiannis warns:
Fluoride is a poison! . . . it has been used as a pesticide for mice, rats and other small pests. A 10-pound infant could be killed by 1/100 of an ounce and a 100-pound adult could be killed by 1/10 of an ounce of fluoride.
In 1977, epidemiological studies by Dr. Dean Burk, former head of the US National Cancer Institute’s cell chemistry section, and Yiamouyiannis reported that fluoridation is linked to about 10,000 cancer deaths yearly.
Fluoride causes more human cancer, and causes it faster, than any other chemical . . . more people have died in the last 30 years from cancer connected with fluoridation than all the military deaths in the entire history of the United States. —Dr. Dean Burk, Congressional Record, 21 July 1976.
In 2005, a study conducted at the Harvard School of DENTAL HEALTH found that there is a direct correlation between fluoride and osteosarcoma (bone cancer) in young boys. Sodium fluoride inhibits enzyme activity, paralyzes white blood cells, and causes collagen to break down. Enzymes, the immune system, and collagen are all fundamental in fighting cancer. All in all, there are more than 500 peer-reviewed studies documenting the adverse effects of sodium fluoride ranging from cancer to brain damage.
In 2010, two separate stories from of India revealed that children are being blinded and crippled partly as a result of fluoride being artificially added to their drinking water. In the Indian village of Gaudiyan, well over half of the population has bone deformities, making them physically handicapped. Children are born normally but after they consume fluoridated water, they begin to develop crippling defects in their hands and feet.
Due to the excess fluoride content in drinking water, dietary calcium is not absorbed in the body, causing disabilities and deformities. —Dr. Amit Shukla, neurophysician
However, in a supercilious manner that would make the Medical Mafia proud, Indian government doctors have denied that fluoridation of drinking water has any connection to the disabilities and have refused to test the water, insisting such tests are “not necessary.” Meanwhile, in the village of Pavagada, children are going blind after being diagnosed with Lamellar Congenital cataract (a condition wherein the eye lenses are damaged). The local doctors attribute the child blindness to two factors—consanguineous marriages and the “fluoride content” of the water. LINK
A Little History—How a Toxic Poison Became “Safe”
In the 1920’s, aluminum manufacturing, due largely to the flourishing canning industry, was booming. But it was also a big producer of toxic waste, namely sodium fluoride. The biggest dilemma was the cost to safely dispose of this hazardous waste, since it was extremely expensive. A company in Pittsburgh, ALCOA, led by their founder and major stockholder, Andrew Mellon, had some “revolutionary” ideas of how to cut the costs of disposing of sodium fluoride.
Under EPA regulations, sodium fluoride was previously required to be disposed of in a landfill for toxic waste. However, Mellon got himself appointed Secretary of the Treasury which at that time was in charge of the US Public Health Services (PHS), and to make a long story short, without any studies, Mellon found a market for his toxic waste (and the toxic waste of the soon to emerge nuclear industry)—the municipal water supplies of the USA.
Under Mellon’s supervision, ALCOA-funded scientist Gerald J. Cox publicly declared that fluoride was good for your teeth, and in 1939, he proposed that the USA should fluoridate its water reservoirs. In essence, sodium fluoride was given the “green light” . . . not by a doctor, not by a dentist, but by a scientist who was working for the largest producer of fluoride in the entire country. I’m not joking, that’s how it all started!
At that time, the ADA and AMA were not yet on the take and they were screaming at Congress to stop this toxic assault. The Journal of the American Dental Association, in 1936 warned that “fluoride at the 1 ppm (part per million) concentration is as toxic as arsenic and lead.” In the 1940’s, countless studies proved conclusively that fluoride is toxic, causes cancer, damages the immune system, causes brain damage, and damages internal organs. But ALCOA, backed by the Military Industrial Complex, wanted a market for the waste created by the nuclear industry, promptly “classified” the incriminating results of each and every study.
They were bound and determined to make a profit from this toxic substance called sodium fluoride. In 1947, Oscar R. Ewing, a long-time ALCOA lawyer, was appointed head of the Federal Security Agency, a position that placed him in charge of the PHS. Under Ewing, a national water fluoridation campaign began. The public relations strategist for the water fluoridation campaign was none other than Sigmund Freud’s nephew Edwin L. Bernays, known as the “Father of Spin.”
Bernays pioneered the application of his uncle’s theories to advertising and government “half truths.” In his book, Propaganda, Bernays argued that “scientific manipulation of public opinion is the key.” He stated, “A relatively small number of persons pull the wires which control the public mind.” His techniques were simple: Pretend there is some favorable research by using phrases like “Numerous studies have shown…” or “Research has proven…” or “Scientific investigators have found…” but then never really cite anything. Say it long enough and loud enough, and eventually people will believe it. If anyone doubts you, attack their character and/or their intellect.
Bernays never strayed from his fundamental axiom to “control the masses without their knowing it.” He believed that the best “PR” occurs when the people are unaware that they are being manipulated. So, under Bernays’ spell, the popular image of fluoride (which at the time was being sold as bug and rat poison) became that of a beneficial provider of gleaming smiles, absolutely safe, and good for children. Any opponents were quickly and permanently engraved on the public mind as crackpots, quacks, and lunatics. In 1950, the government officially endorsed fluoridation, and today, over 70% of the nation’s reservoirs are fluoridated with almost 150,000 tons of sodium fluoride each and every year, despite the fact that it is a toxic waste and causes countless health problems.
In Summary
Truth be told, fluoride is a hazardous-waste by-product from aluminum, fertilizer, and the nuclear industries. But rather than paying to dispose of their hazardous waste, these companies are able to sell their waste to municipalities so they can drip it into our water and forcibly “mass-medicate” the entire population!
I am appalled at the prospect of using water as a vehicle for drugs. Fluoride is a corrosive poison that will produce serious damaging effects on a long term basis. Any attempt to use water this way is deplorable. —Dr. Charles G. Heyd (past Presiden tof the AMA)
I leave you with this quote from EPA scientist, Dr. Robert Carton:
Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud in this century, if not of all time.
Until next time, may God bless you all.
==
This article was originally published in April 2015 and has been updated in February 2020.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-02--Aluminium Adjuvants in Vaccines: Missing Information

I have been researching human exposure to aluminium for over thirty-five years .
I am ( sometimes affectionately ) known as Mr Aluminium .
About ten years ago , I became interested in aluminium adjuvants and specifically how they help to potentiate the immune response in vaccination .
Funded initially by the Medical Research Council ( Nanotoxicity of Aluminium Adjuvants ) we set about testing dogma associated with their mechanism of action in vaccines .
We have recently reviewed this subject including our own research in the field .
There are , of course , more questions remaining than answers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nascent understanding of the mode of action of aluminium adjuvants .
It is clear that a vaccine including an aluminium adjuvant is an acute exposure to aluminium ( read paper ) .
The aluminium adjuvant initiates an inflammatory response in the immediate vicinity of the injection site .
Myriad infiltrating cells flood the damaged area and responding to the inflammation take up adjuvant and antigen into their cytoplasm ( Scientifi report ) though not necessarily as an adjuvant-antigen complex ( read report ) .
Adjuvant is transported to lymph glands ( read article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ macrophages ( read report ) and other histiocytes throughout the body including into the brain ( read article ) .
The latter , though demonstrated in an animal model ( read article ) remains to be proven in humans .
Vaccines that include an aluminium adjuvant are a source of aluminium to the rest of the body and this should be a concern .
This important and up to date information on aluminium adjuvants is missing from a vaccine safety information website hosted by the ( Why vaccination is safe and important ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the information given there is , at best , incorrect .
Example 1 .
‘ Adjuvants are added to vaccines in very small amounts , which have been shown to be safe.
’ There have not been any clinical trials designed and carried out to test the safety of aluminium adjuvants .
Not a single clinical safety trial for any vaccine that includes an aluminium adjuvant .
Vaccine manufacturers are not obliged to demonstrate the safety of aluminium adjuvants .
Indeed vaccine manufacturers invariably use aluminium adjuvants as placebos in vaccine efficacy trials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3Dihub ) .
Example 2 .
‘ There ’ s no evidence that the levels of aluminium we come across every day increase the risk of conditions like dementia or autism.
’ There may not be consensus that aluminium increases the risk of dementia but there is burgeoning scientific evidence that this is the case .
Recent research on aluminium in brain tissue in familial Alzheimer ’ s disease ( https : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X16303777 ) left very little doubt that aluminium , an accepted neurotoxin , contributes towards Alzheimer ’ s disease ( https @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the is at best incorrect and at worst misinformation .
While the evidence linking aluminium with autism remains preliminary the high content of aluminium in brain tissue in autism ( https : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763 ) should not be so easily , perhaps conveniently , discarded .
Example 3 ‘ The amount of aluminium used in killed vaccines is very , very small .
No harmful effects have been seen with vaccines that contain an aluminium-based adjuvant.
’ The myth that the aluminium content of a vaccine is miniscule has now been comprehensively refuted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X19304201 ) and this misleading information needs to be removed from all advice given to paediatricians and parents alike .
Similarly , the patient information leaflet provided with every vaccine lists all of the known harmful effects recorded for that vaccine .
Those responsible for administering vaccines are required by law to ask the recipient or recipient ’ s guardian to read the patient information leaflet so that they are aware of the possible harmful effects .
It is outrageous and wrong for advice to be so misleading to those they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all of my academic career trying to understand how human exposure to aluminium impacts upon our health .
Everything that I have learned about aluminium points towards it being a major health issue , today and if we carry on being complacent about our exposure , in the future .
We need to ensure that the information made available about the possible toxicity of aluminium in humans is wholly science based and as up to date as is possible .
We live in the ‘ Aluminium Age ’ and the modern world would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ However , it is time that we accept that aluminium is inimical to living processes and that we must only continue to use it when it has been proven to be both effective and safe .
This must include its complacent and misunderstood use in vaccines .

By Professor Chris Exley | PHARMACY/DRUGS
I have been researching human exposure to aluminium for over thirty-five years. I am (sometimes affectionately) known as Mr Aluminium. About ten years ago, I became interested in aluminium adjuvants and specifically how they help to potentiate the immune response in vaccination.
Funded initially by the Medical Research Council (Nanotoxicity of Aluminium Adjuvants) we set about testing dogma associated with their mechanism of action in vaccines. We have recently reviewed this subject including our own research in the field. There are, of course, more questions remaining than answers obtained but we do now have a nascent understanding of the mode of action of aluminium adjuvants.
It is clear that a vaccine including an aluminium adjuvant is an acute exposure to aluminium (read paper). The aluminium adjuvant initiates an inflammatory response in the immediate vicinity of the injection site. Myriad infiltrating cells flood the damaged area and responding to the inflammation take up adjuvant and antigen into their cytoplasm (Scientifi report) though not necessarily as an adjuvant-antigen complex (read report). Adjuvant is transported to lymph glands (read article) and may also be carried in macrophages (read report) and other histiocytes throughout the body including into the brain (read article). The latter, though demonstrated in an animal model (read article) remains to be proven in humans. Vaccines that include an aluminium adjuvant are a source of aluminium to the rest of the body and this should be a concern.
This important and up to date information on aluminium adjuvants is missing from a vaccine safety information website hosted by the NHS (Why vaccination is safe and important). Perhaps of equal importance is that the information given there is, at best, incorrect.
Example 1. ‘Adjuvants are added to vaccines in very small amounts, which have been shown to be safe.’
There have not been any clinical trials designed and carried out to test the safety of aluminium adjuvants. Not a single clinical safety trial for any vaccine that includes an aluminium adjuvant. Vaccine manufacturers are not obliged to demonstrate the safety of aluminium adjuvants. Indeed vaccine manufacturers invariably use aluminium adjuvants as placebos in vaccine efficacy trials (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X11013089?via%3Dihub).
Example 2. ‘There’s no evidence that the levels of aluminium we come across every day increase the risk of conditions like dementia or autism.’
There may not be consensus that aluminium increases the risk of dementia but there is burgeoning scientific evidence that this is the case. Recent research on aluminium in brain tissue in familial Alzheimer’s disease (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X16303777) left very little doubt that aluminium, an accepted neurotoxin, contributes towards Alzheimer’s disease (https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease-reports/adr170010). The advice given by the NHS is at best incorrect and at worst misinformation. While the evidence linking aluminium with autism remains preliminary the high content of aluminium in brain tissue in autism (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763) should not be so easily, perhaps conveniently, discarded.
Example 3 ‘The amount of aluminium used in killed vaccines is very, very small. No harmful effects have been seen with vaccines that contain an aluminium-based adjuvant.’
The myth that the aluminium content of a vaccine is miniscule has now been comprehensively refuted in the peer-reviewed scientific literature (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X19304201) and this misleading information needs to be removed from all advice given to paediatricians and parents alike. Similarly, the patient information leaflet provided with every vaccine lists all of the known harmful effects recorded for that vaccine. Those responsible for administering vaccines are required by law to ask the recipient or recipient’s guardian to read the patient information leaflet so that they are aware of the possible harmful effects. It is outrageous and wrong for NHS advice to be so misleading to those they are charged with protecting.
I have spent all of my academic career trying to understand how human exposure to aluminium impacts upon our health. Everything that I have learned about aluminium points towards it being a major health issue, today and if we carry on being complacent about our exposure, in the future. We need to ensure that the information made available about the possible toxicity of aluminium in humans is wholly science based and as up to date as is possible. We live in the ‘Aluminium Age’ and the modern world would be a lesser place without aluminium. However, it is time that we accept that aluminium is inimical to living processes and that we must only continue to use it when it has been proven to be both effective and safe. This must include its complacent and misunderstood use in vaccines.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-02--FCC approves $9.7 billion payment to free up satellite spectrum for 5G

The agency approves a controversial plan to speed up moving satellite providers off of valuable C-band spectrum .
The Federal Communications Commission voted along party lines Friday to move forward with a controversial plan to pay satellite companies to free up critical midband spectrum for 5G use .
The agency voted 3-2 to authorize the auction and specific bidding procedures .
Democrats on the commission agreed that more of the valuable midband spectrum is needed to make 5G a reality in the US , but they criticized the Republican-led agency for overstepping its authority in creating an auction that would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to satellite providers for moving off their spectrum early .
The so-called C-Band auction is the FCC ’ s latest move to free up more spectrum for 5G .
The agency has been under pressure to make available more so-called midband spectrum , which will be critical in the deployment of 5G because it ’ ll allow signals to travel over longer distances than the very-high-frequency spectrum the FCC has already auctioned off for 5G .
The plan calls for the FCC to pay satellite companies $ 3 billion to $ 5 billion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and moving to another frequency so the airwaves can be auctioned .
But the most controversial part of the plan is the $ 9.7 billion the FCC plans to pay satellite providers to accelerate their move off their C-Band spectrum .
After the plan was announced earlier this month , several Democrats in Congress objected to the incentive payments , warning they would lead to litigation and delay in the rollout of 5G service .
Democrats on the FCC , Commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Geoffrey Starks , argued Friday that the FCC has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cut of the proceeds to paying off foreign satellite companies .
Instead , they say the FCC is required by law to put this money into the US Treasury .
They argued that the nearly $ 10 billion in proceeds from the auction could be better used to help close the digital divide and boost emergency communications .
Specifically , Rosenworcel and Starks said the FCC can ’ t compensate satellite operators beyond what it costs them to relocate their service to another part of the spectrum band .
“ We force C-band @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billion to incumbent satellite operators over and above their relocation costs , ” Rosenworcel said .
“ There is no cite to any legal authority or precedent that allows us to do so.
” She said the FCC should wait for Congress to decide what , if any , accelerated payments should be made to satellite providers .
Some members of Congress are backing legislation to prevent payments to satellite providers .
Starks was also unhappy with the accelerated payment to satellite providers .
He said the FCC had overstepped its authority in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who “ might not even keep their end of the bargain.
” Still , he said he was glad it ’ s a public auction , and not a private one , which was a proposal pushed by satellite providers .
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said it was time to move forward in getting midband spectrum out in the market for 5G .
He also took swipes at his Democratic colleagues for their criticism .
“ There are some who argue that we should wait — indefinitely , ” Pai said .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ astounding that some making this criticism are the very same people who have previously complained that the agency isn ’ t moving quickly enough on midband spectrum.
” Negotiations over how much spectrum satellite companies would have to give up and how they ’ d transition their use of the spectrum has been going on for months .
All the while , the wireless industry has been pushing for this spectrum to be reallocated so it can be used to build their 5G networks .
The C-Band spectrum , which is in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crucial to the deployment of 5G .
Wireless carriers need a mix of wireless spectrum that consists of very-high-frequency spectrum , low-band spectrum and midband spectrum , like the C-Band spectrum , to deliver the coverage and speeds necessary to make 5G a reality .
C-Band is also valuable because it ’ s the same spectrum that several other countries around the world plan to use for 5G .
Twenty-three countries , including Australia , Germany , Finland , South Korea and the UK , have already auctioned or allocated C-Band spectrum for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expected to take place in December .

by Marguerite Reardon
The agency approves a controversial plan to speed up moving satellite providers off of valuable C-band spectrum.
The Federal Communications Commission voted along party lines Friday to move forward with a controversial plan to pay satellite companies to free up critical midband spectrum for 5G use. The agency voted 3-2 to authorize the auction and specific bidding procedures.
Democrats on the commission agreed that more of the valuable midband spectrum is needed to make 5G a reality in the US, but they criticized the Republican-led agency for overstepping its authority in creating an auction that would allocate billions of dollars in incentive payments to satellite providers for moving off their spectrum early.
The so-called C-Band auction is the FCC’s latest move to free up more spectrum for 5G. The agency has been under pressure to make available more so-called midband spectrum, which will be critical in the deployment of 5G because it’ll allow signals to travel over longer distances than the very-high-frequency spectrum the FCC has already auctioned off for 5G.
The plan calls for the FCC to pay satellite companies $3 billion to $5 billion in compensation for abandoning the C-Band spectrum and moving to another frequency so the airwaves can be auctioned. But the most controversial part of the plan is the $9.7 billion the FCC plans to pay satellite providers to accelerate their move off their C-Band spectrum.
The criticism
After the plan was announced earlier this month, several Democrats in Congress objected to the incentive payments, warning they would lead to litigation and delay in the rollout of 5G service. Democrats on the FCC, Commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Geoffrey Starks, argued Friday that the FCC has no authority to allocate such a big cut of the proceeds to paying off foreign satellite companies. Instead, they say the FCC is required by law to put this money into the US Treasury. They argued that the nearly $10 billion in proceeds from the auction could be better used to help close the digital divide and boost emergency communications.
Specifically, Rosenworcel and Starks said the FCC can’t compensate satellite operators beyond what it costs them to relocate their service to another part of the spectrum band.
“We force C-band auction winners to pay nearly $10 billion to incumbent satellite operators over and above their relocation costs,” Rosenworcel said. “There is no cite to any legal authority or precedent that allows us to do so.”
She said the FCC should wait for Congress to decide what, if any, accelerated payments should be made to satellite providers. Some members of Congress are backing legislation to prevent payments to satellite providers.
Starks was also unhappy with the accelerated payment to satellite providers. He said the FCC had overstepped its authority in committing to payments to foreign satellite companies who “might not even keep their end of the bargain.” Still, he said he was glad it’s a public auction, and not a private one, which was a proposal pushed by satellite providers.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said it was time to move forward in getting midband spectrum out in the market for 5G. He also took swipes at his Democratic colleagues for their criticism.
“There are some who argue that we should wait — indefinitely,” Pai said. “It’s at once amusing and astounding that some making this criticism are the very same people who have previously complained that the agency isn’t moving quickly enough on midband spectrum.”
A long and complicated process
Negotiations over how much spectrum satellite companies would have to give up and how they’d transition their use of the spectrum has been going on for months. All the while, the wireless industry has been pushing for this spectrum to be reallocated so it can be used to build their 5G networks.
The C-Band spectrum, which is in the 3.7GHz-4.2GHz range of frequencies, is considered crucial to the deployment of 5G. Wireless carriers need a mix of wireless spectrum that consists of very-high-frequency spectrum, low-band spectrum and midband spectrum, like the C-Band spectrum, to deliver the coverage and speeds necessary to make 5G a reality.
C-Band is also valuable because it’s the same spectrum that several other countries around the world plan to use for 5G. Twenty-three countries, including Australia, Germany, Finland, South Korea and the UK, have already auctioned or allocated C-Band spectrum for 5G mobile usage.
The auction is expected to take place in December.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--F.D.A. Warns 7 Companies to Stop Claiming Silver and Other Products Treat Coronavirus

The other companies did not immediately respond to a request for comment .
The Jim Bakker Show broadcasts an hourlong @ @ @ @ @ , hosted by the televangelists Jim and Lori Bakker .
In 1989 , Mr. Bakker @ @ @ @ @ in prison and fined $ 500,000 for fraud in connection with his TV ministry , @ @ @ @ @ years in prison and a halfway house .

The other companies did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Jim Bakker Show broadcasts an hourlong show of the same name, hosted by the televangelists Jim and Lori Bakker. In 1989, Mr. Bakker was sentenced to 45 years in prison and fined $500,000 for fraud in connection with his TV ministry, and he ultimately served five years in prison and a halfway house.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--Army signs agreement with drug giant Gilead on experimental COVID-19 treatment

U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command has signed an arrangement with Gilead Sciences to provide the company ’ s investigational coronavirus drug to U.S. troops confirmed to have the COVID-19 virus .
Gilead ’ s medication , remdesivir , was approved for clinical research in February by the Food and Drug Administration .
The medication , which initially was developed by the Foster City , California-based company to treat Ebola , has had some demonstrated success targeting coronaviruses , including Middle East Respiratory Syndrome , or MERS , and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , SARS .
The medicine , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for safety and effectiveness in two separate clinical trials in China and one by the National Institute of Allergy and Infection Diseases .
In the U.S. study , the first volunteer was an evacuee from the Diamond Princess cruise ship hospitalized with the illness at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha .
Under the agreement between Gilead and U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity , remdesivir will be provided to the Defense Department at no cost .
“ Together with our government and industry partners , we are progressing at almost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prevention products that will protect the citizens of the world and preserve the readiness and lethality of our service members , ” Army Brig .
Gen. Michael Talley , commanding general of USAMRDC and Fort Detrick , Maryland , said in a statement Tuesday .
Gilead Science Chief Medical Officer Dr. Merdad Parsey said last month the speed of remdesivir ’ s development “ reflects the pressing need for treatment options and the shared commitment ” of industry , government and health services “ to respond to this public health threat with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are developing treatments for the virus , but none are in clinical trials .
The COVID-19 coronavirus has infected nearly 650 people in the United States and killed 25 , while worldwide , the number of cases has passed 100,000 , including 3,281 deaths .
Private companies and federal researchers also are working to develop a vaccine against the coronavirus .
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command personnel are conducting animal studies for a vaccine they began developing in January shortly after the outbreak began @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine could be ready by next winter , should COVID-19 become a seasonal illness similar to the influenza virus .
“ We are trying a variety of medications and testing them in different scenarios so we hope that we will have some medical countermeasures available sooner ” than a vaccine , Air Force Brig .
Gen. Paul A. Friedrichs told reporters during a press conference Tuesday at the Pentagon .
The Department of Defense has at least 10 cases of COVID-19 : an active-duty service member and spouse who are quarantined in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ McChord , Washington : a Marine assigned to Quantico Marine Corps Base in Virginia ; an active-duty soldier in South Korea , a sailor in Italy , four additional family members and a contractor assigned to the Navy Bureau of Medicine in Falls Church , Virginia .

By
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command has signed an arrangement with Gilead Sciences to provide the company’s investigational coronavirus drug to U.S. troops confirmed to have the COVID-19 virus.
Gilead’s medication, remdesivir, was approved for clinical research in February by the Food and Drug Administration. The medication, which initially was developed by the Foster City, California-based company to treat Ebola, has had some demonstrated success targeting coronaviruses, including Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, or MERS, and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, SARS.
The medicine, given intravenously, is currently being tested for safety and effectiveness in two separate clinical trials in China and one by the National Institute of Allergy and Infection Diseases. In the U.S. study, the first volunteer was an evacuee from the Diamond Princess cruise ship hospitalized with the illness at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha.
Under the agreement between Gilead and U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity, remdesivir will be provided to the Defense Department at no cost.
“Together with our government and industry partners, we are progressing at almost revolutionary rates to deliver effective treatment and prevention products that will protect the citizens of the world and preserve the readiness and lethality of our service members,” Army Brig. Gen. Michael Talley, commanding general of USAMRDC and Fort Detrick, Maryland, said in a statement Tuesday.
Gilead Science Chief Medical Officer Dr. Merdad Parsey said last month the speed of remdesivir’s development “reflects the pressing need for treatment options and the shared commitment” of industry, government and health services “to respond to this public health threat with the highest urgency.”
Other companies besides Gilead are developing treatments for the virus, but none are in clinical trials. The COVID-19 coronavirus has infected nearly 650 people in the United States and killed 25, while worldwide, the number of cases has passed 100,000, including 3,281 deaths.
Private companies and federal researchers also are working to develop a vaccine against the coronavirus. Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command personnel are conducting animal studies for a vaccine they began developing in January shortly after the outbreak began in Wuhan, China.
Officials expect a vaccine could be ready by next winter, should COVID-19 become a seasonal illness similar to the influenza virus.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--NEW SAFETY CONCERNS RAISED ABOUT THE QUANTITIES OF ALUMINIUM IN CHILDHOOD VACCINES

Landmark FDA Paper on Aluminum Safety in Vaccines Has Crucial Math Error The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ( ATSDR ) , a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) , have raised concerns about the negative effects of aluminum exposure in humans .
Because some vaccines contain aluminum , the FDA published a paper in 2011 ( Mitkus et al . )
to address concerns about aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants .
The paper compared the aluminum exposure from vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oral aluminum determined by the ATSDR .
However , THIS STUDY INCORRECTLY BASED ITS CALCULATIONS on 0.78 % of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream rather than the value of 0.1 % used by the ATSDR in its computations .
As a result , THE FDA PAPER ASSUMED THAT NEARLY 8 ( 0.78 % /0.1 % ) TIMES MORE ALUMINIUM CAN SAFELY ENTER THE BLOODSTREAM , and this led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety limit .
Shockingly this could mean that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ babies is well above any safe limit .
Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) , an educational nonprofit organization dedicated to delivering data on infectious diseases and vaccines , posted a detailed description of this error today on ResearchGate .
Dr. Christopher Shaw , professor at the University of British Columbia , has performed numerous studies on the effects of injected aluminum on mice , and commented : “ We knew that the Mitkus et al .
paper modeling aluminum clearance had to be inaccurate since it was assuming that injected aluminum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of aluminum acquired through diet .
Now , in addition , we see that THEY DID THEIR MODELING BASED ON USING INCORRECT LEVELS OF ALUMINIUM ABSORPTION .
What is particularly striking is that despite all these errors , SINCE 2011 , Mitkus et al .
( This possibly heavily flawed paper ) IS USED BY CDC AND OTHER ENTITIES AS THE BASIS FOR CLAIMING THAT ALUMINIUM ADJUVANTS ARE SAFE ” Dr. Shira Miller , president of Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) , said , “ We posted the Mitkus 2011 erratum @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the attention of scientists and researchers who are interested in the safety of the quantities of injected aluminum found in childhood vaccines and would be in a position to further research the safety concern.
” I know of one dedicated scientist who is currently working to prove that this error in calculations of a safe amount of aluminium in vaccines is harming many people , I hope soon that they and others , can provide proof to immediately stop the production and use of any vaccine with aluminium .

By NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF
Landmark FDA Paper on Aluminum Safety in Vaccines Has Crucial Math Error
Physicians for Informed Consent Reports on ResearchGate
“NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. (PRWEB) March 6, 2020
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), have raised concerns about the negative effects of aluminum exposure in humans.
Because some vaccines contain aluminum, the FDA published a paper in 2011 (Mitkus et al.) to address concerns about aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants. The paper compared the aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants to a safety limit of oral aluminum determined by the ATSDR.
However, THIS STUDY INCORRECTLY BASED ITS CALCULATIONS on 0.78% of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream rather than the value of 0.1% used by the ATSDR in its computations.
As a result, THE FDA PAPER ASSUMED THAT NEARLY 8 (0.78%/0.1%) TIMES MORE ALUMINIUM CAN SAFELY ENTER THE BLOODSTREAM, and this led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety limit.
Shockingly this could mean that the aluminium injected daily into one day old babies is well above any safe limit.
Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), an educational nonprofit organization dedicated to delivering data on infectious diseases and vaccines, posted a detailed description of this error today on ResearchGate.
Dr. Christopher Shaw, professor at the University of British Columbia, has performed numerous studies on the effects of injected aluminum on mice, and commented:
“We knew that the Mitkus et al. paper modeling aluminum clearance had to be inaccurate since it was assuming that injected aluminum kinetics were the same as the kinetics of aluminum acquired through diet. Now, in addition, we see that THEY DID THEIR MODELING BASED ON USING INCORRECT LEVELS OF ALUMINIUM ABSORPTION.
What is particularly striking is that despite all these errors, SINCE 2011, Mitkus et al. (This possibly heavily flawed paper) IS USED BY CDC AND OTHER ENTITIES AS THE BASIS FOR CLAIMING THAT ALUMINIUM ADJUVANTS ARE SAFE”
Dr. Shira Miller, president of Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), said, “We posted the Mitkus 2011 erratum on ResearchGate in hopes of bringing it to the attention of scientists and researchers who are interested in the safety of the quantities of injected aluminum found in childhood vaccines and would be in a position to further research the safety concern.”
I know of one dedicated scientist who is currently working to prove that this error in calculations of a safe amount of aluminium in vaccines is harming many people, I hope soon that they and others, can provide proof to immediately stop the production and use of any vaccine with aluminium.
https://www.prweb.com/ releases/ physicians_for_informed_con sent_reports_on_researchga te_landmark_fda_paper_on_a luminum_safety_in_vaccines _has_crucial_math_error/ prweb16960398.htm


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--Doctors: Vaccines turn people’s immune systems against them

In some medical circles , it has long been suspected that vaccines are not the beneficial weapons against disease they are made out to be , at least not completely .
In fact , some find them harmful to human immune systems rather than universally constructive .
As reported by Natural Blaze , some top doctors think that vaccines can actually turn our immune systems against us .
Yehuda Shoenfeld , an Israeli clinician , has spent more than 30 years studying the human immune system and is now at the top of his game .
Indeed , he ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wrote many of the textbooks in his profession .
So , he knows of what he speaks .
Those textbooks include : The Mosaic of Autoimmunity , Autoantibodies , Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases , Infection and Autoimmunity , Cancer and Autoimmunity , as well as many others .
In fact , the complete list consists of 25 titles , with some of them serving as cornerstones of clinical practice .
Shoenfeld is so renowned in his field , in fact , that he ’ s been dubbed the “ Godfather of Autoimmunology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the immune system as it responds to a bevy of disease processes ranging from Type 1 diabetes to multiple sclerosis and cancers .
… [ S ] omething strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines — specifically , some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum — as a significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases [ Related : Stay current on vaccines and related information at Vaccines.news . ]
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , research has produced a larger body of evidence in this area of autoimmunology .
In the past five years , the evidence has really accelerated .
For example , a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research features Shoenfeld and colleagues issuing unprecedented guidelines identifying four categories of people who they say are most at risk of vaccine-induced autoimmunity .
The paper ’ s authors write that , “ on one hand , ” vaccines can prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity .
“ On the other hand , many reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines can indeed trigger autoimmunity , ” they note .
Autoimmune diseases that can be triggered after vaccination include lupus ( systemic lupus erythematosus SLE ) , arthritis , diabetes , thrombocytopenia .
Vasculitis Guillain-Barre syndrome , demyelinating disorders and others .
“ Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of ASIA , ” the wrote .
ASIA—Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants — which is also known as Shoenfeld ’ s syndrome — first appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunity about four years ago , Natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ catch-all term for a host of similar symptoms that include Chronic Fatigue Syndrome , which can result following exposure to an adjuvant ; an environmental element that includes common ingredients found in vaccines designed to stimulate the immune system .
[ RELATED : Stay current with all the latest disease research at Prevention.news . ]
Using ASIA as a standard , a large body of research has been gathered to help researchers begin to understand how environmental toxins , in particular the aluminum found in many vaccines , can trigger a severe autoimmune @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which can then lead to a pervasive autoimmune disease .
“ Throughout our lifetime the normal immune system walks a fine line between preserving normal immune reactions and developing autoimmune diseases , ” the paper says .
“ The healthy immune system is tolerant to self-antigens .
When self-tolerance is disturbed , dysregulation of the immune system follows , resulting in emergence of an autoimmune disease .
Vaccination is one of the conditions that may disturb this homeostasis in susceptible individuals , resulting in autoimmune phenomena and ASIA.
” As we reported in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found in vaccines is linked to Alzheimer ’ s disease , as well as other neurological conditions .
That ’ s important , considering that dementia and Alzheimer ’ s are now the leading causes of death around the world , surpassing even heart disease .

By JD Heyes
In some medical circles, it has long been suspected that vaccines are not the beneficial weapons against disease they are made out to be, at least not completely. In fact, some find them harmful to human immune systems rather than universally constructive.
As reported by Natural Blaze, some top doctors think that vaccines can actually turn our immune systems against us.
Yehuda Shoenfeld, an Israeli clinician, has spent more than 30 years studying the human immune system and is now at the top of his game. Indeed, he’s no quack or theorist; he wrote many of the textbooks in his profession. So, he knows of what he speaks.
Those textbooks include: The Mosaic of Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and Autoimmunity, as well as many others. In fact, the complete list consists of 25 titles, with some of them serving as cornerstones of clinical practice. Shoenfeld is so renowned in his field, in fact, that he’s been dubbed the “Godfather of Autoimmunology,” which is the study of the immune system as it responds to a bevy of disease processes ranging from Type 1 diabetes to multiple sclerosis and cancers.
Yet, as Natural Blaze notes:
…[S]omething strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines — specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum — as a significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases [Related: Stay current on vaccines and related information at Vaccines.news.]
In fact, over the past 15 years, research has produced a larger body of evidence in this area of autoimmunology. In the past five years, the evidence has really accelerated. For example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research features Shoenfeld and colleagues issuing unprecedented guidelines identifying four categories of people who they say are most at risk of vaccine-induced autoimmunity.
The paper’s authors write that, “on one hand,” vaccines can prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity. “On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can indeed trigger autoimmunity,” they note. Autoimmune diseases that can be triggered after vaccination include lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus SLE), arthritis, diabetes, thrombocytopenia. Vasculitis Guillain-Barre syndrome, demyelinating disorders and others.
“Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of ASIA,” the wrote.
ASIA—Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants — which is also known as Shoenfeld’s syndrome — first appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunity about four years ago, Natural Blaze reported. It’s a catch-all term for a host of similar symptoms that include Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, which can result following exposure to an adjuvant; an environmental element that includes common ingredients found in vaccines designed to stimulate the immune system. [RELATED: Stay current with all the latest disease research at Prevention.news.]
Using ASIA as a standard, a large body of research has been gathered to help researchers begin to understand how environmental toxins, in particular the aluminum found in many vaccines, can trigger a severe autoimmune response in those who are susceptible, which can then lead to a pervasive autoimmune disease.
“Throughout our lifetime the normal immune system walks a fine line between preserving normal immune reactions and developing autoimmune diseases,” the paper says. “The healthy immune system is tolerant to self-antigens. When self-tolerance is disturbed, dysregulation of the immune system follows, resulting in emergence of an autoimmune disease. Vaccination is one of the conditions that may disturb this homeostasis in susceptible individuals, resulting in autoimmune phenomena and ASIA.”
As we reported in 2016, studies have shown that aluminum found in vaccines is linked to Alzheimer’s disease, as well as other neurological conditions. That’s important, considering that dementia and Alzheimer’s are now the leading causes of death around the world, surpassing even heart disease.


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--The CDC can no longer claim they have proved vaccines do not cause autism

For over 2 decades the CDC has claimed that “ Vaccines Do Not Cause AUTISM ” .
It ’ s been headlined in newspapers , social media postings , written on chalkboards , and found plastered on too many websites to mention .
It ’ s been repeated so much that doctors and nurses use that phrase to bully patients into vaccines despite legitimate family history concerns .
Who came up with that CATCH PHRASE and more importantly , IS IT a scientific phrase ?
MEANING can the research support the claim that ALL vaccines individually , cumulatively , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Action Network ’ s released statement says , “ The CDC claims on its website that “ Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.
” Despite this claim , studies have found between 40 % and 70 % of parents with an autistic child continue to blame vaccines for their child ’ s autism , typically pointing to vaccines given during the first six months of life .
Vaccines given during the first six months of life , according to the CDC ’ s childhood vaccine schedule , include three doses each of DTaP , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , for a total of fifteen doses in these six months .
In the summer of 2019 , ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) request to the CDC for “ All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.
” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB , Hib , PCV13 and IPV , as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC failed to produce a single study in response to these FOIA requests .
ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court , where the CDC finally conceded , in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge , that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism .
In the stipulation , the CDC was only able to identify 20 studies : > One relating to MMR ( a vaccine ICAN did not challenge ) ; > Thirteen relating to thimerosal ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines ICAN queried ) ; > Five relating to both MMR and thimerosal ; and > One relating to antigen ( not a vaccine ) exposure .
On the CDC ’ s list of studies was a recent review by the Institute of Medicine ( IOM ) , paid for by the CDC , which conducted a comprehensive review for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism .
The result was that the IOM could not identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism .
“ When it comes to autism , vaccines are the one suspected culprit that the CDC claims to have exhaustively investigated , ” founder of ICAN , Del Bigtree explains , “ yet the CDC could not provide a single study to support that any of the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism .
“ The most recent data from CDC shows that 1 in 36 children born this year in the USA will develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a true epidemic .
If the CDC had spent the same resources studying vaccines and autism , as it did waging a media campaign against parents that claim vaccines caused their child ’ s autism , the world would be a better place for everyone.
” This is another of ICAN ’ s numerous victories again federal health agencies regarding vaccine safety .
Prior victories include : > HHS concedes it has not provided a single vaccine safety report to Congress as required by the Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccines in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
ICAN v. HHS , No .
18-cv-3215 ( S.D.N.Y . )
> The Federal Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) concedes that it does not have any clinical trials to support injecting the flu shot or Tdap vaccines into pregnant women .
ICAN v. FDA , No .
18-cv-11237 ( S.D.N.Y . )
> The National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) concedes that the Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines has not made a single recommendation for improving vaccine safety during the period at issue .
ICAN v. NIH , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ > The FDA , pursuant to a FOIA request from ICAN , eventually produced the clinical trials it relied upon to license the current MMR vaccine which revealed that these clinical trials had in total of less than 1,000 participants and far more adverse reactions than previously acknowledged.
” – Tennessee Health Alliance- The court stipulation and order can be found here : https : //www.icandecide.org/…/Stipulation-and-Order-Fully-Ex…

By ICAN-VS-CDC-LAWSUIT-PR
For over 2 decades the CDC has claimed that “Vaccines Do Not Cause AUTISM”. It’s been headlined in newspapers, social media postings, written on chalkboards, and found plastered on too many websites to mention. It’s been repeated so much that doctors and nurses use that phrase to bully patients into vaccines despite legitimate family history concerns.
Who came up with that CATCH PHRASE and more importantly, IS IT a scientific phrase?
MEANING can the research support the claim that ALL vaccines individually, cumulatively, and unequivocally meet that criteria?
Informed Consent Action Network’s released statement says, “The CDC claims on its website that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.” Despite this claim, studies have found between 40% and 70% of parents with an autistic child continue to blame vaccines for their child’s autism, typically pointing to vaccines given during the first six months of life.
Vaccines given during the first six months of life, according to the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule, include three doses each of DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, for a total of fifteen doses in these six months.
In the summer of 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC for “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.”
ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism.
Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single study in response to these FOIA requests.
ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.
In the stipulation, the CDC was only able to identify 20 studies:
> One relating to MMR (a vaccine ICAN did not challenge);
> Thirteen relating to thimerosal (an ingredient not in any of the vaccines ICAN queried);
> Five relating to both MMR and thimerosal; and
> One relating to antigen (not a vaccine) exposure.
On the CDC’s list of studies was a recent review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), paid for by the CDC, which conducted a comprehensive review for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism. The result was that the IOM could not identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism.
Instead, the only relevant study the IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism.
“When it comes to autism, vaccines are the one suspected culprit that the CDC claims to have exhaustively investigated,” founder of ICAN, Del Bigtree explains, “yet the CDC could not provide a single study to support that any of the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism.
“The most recent data from CDC shows that 1 in 36 children born this year in the USA will develop autism,” Bigtree says.11 “This is a true epidemic. If the CDC had spent the same resources studying vaccines and autism, as it did waging a media campaign against parents that claim vaccines caused their child’s autism, the world would be a better place for everyone.”
This is another of ICAN’s numerous victories again federal health agencies regarding vaccine safety.
Prior victories include:
> HHS concedes it has not provided a single vaccine safety report to Congress as required by the Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccines in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. ICAN v. HHS, No. 18-cv-3215 (S.D.N.Y.)
> The Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concedes that it does not have any clinical trials to support injecting the flu shot or Tdap vaccines into pregnant
women. ICAN v. FDA, No. 18-cv-11237 (S.D.N.Y.)
> The National Institutes of Health (NIH) concedes that the Task Force on Safer
Childhood Vaccines has not made a single recommendation for improving vaccine safety during the period at issue. ICAN v. NIH, No. 18-cv-2000 (S.D.N.Y.)
> The FDA, pursuant to a FOIA request from ICAN, eventually produced the clinical trials it relied upon to license the current MMR vaccine which revealed that these clinical trials had in total of less than 1,000 participants and far more adverse reactions than previously acknowledged.”
– Tennessee Health Alliance-
Sources:
https://www.icandecide.org/…/…/03/ICAN-VS-CDC-LAWSUIT-PR.pdf
ICAN’s initial court complaint can be found here:
https://www.icandecide.org/…/001-COMPLAINT-against-Centers-…
The court stipulation and order can be found here:
https://www.icandecide.org/…/Stipulation-and-Order-Fully-Ex…


australiannationalreview--2020-05-03--A new wave of 5G to hit Australia

A new wave of 5G to hit Australia

Australians will get an early taste of 5G ’ s full potential when Telstra launches the country ’ s first “ millimetre wave ” 5G customer trials mid-year , which will see boosted mobile broadband speeds and reduced peak hour network traffic jams .
Telstra and Optus ’ 5G rollouts are gradually extending across the country , with Vodafone scheduled to join them this month , but for all the hype so far we ’ ve only scratched the surface of 5G ’ s true potential .
These early 5G mobile networks run on similar wireless frequencies to the existing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is also designed to take advantage of the much higher 26GHz band – dubbed millimetre wave or “ mmWave ” – that delivers even faster speeds over short distances .
Along with faster speeds , mmWave also offers lower latency , making it well-suited to the new generation of services and devices that demand quick response times , such as self-driving cars .
“ More than four million people now pass through our 5G footprint and can access its benefits on any given day , ” says Telstra CEO Andy Penn .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capacity and the potential to deliver even faster speeds as well as lower latency will help power the next generation of devices and innovations.
” Along with providing 5G coverage to mobile phones , Optus is also using 5G to deliver fixed-wireless home broadband as a substitute for the NBN .
In the future , mmWave 5G might also be used by Australia ’ s telcos to deliver fixed-wireless home broadband , reliant on an outdoor antenna , with the ability to offer gigabit download speeds 10 times faster than the typical fibre @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consumer mmWave trails in the middle of this year , wide adoption is still several years away .
The 26GHz mmWave spectrum won ’ t be auctioned by Australia ’ s telecommunications regulator until next year , with Telstra bidding against rivals including Optus and the newly merged TPG/Vodafone .
Telstra ’ s first mmWave-compatible 5G device will be its upcoming Telstra 5G Wi-Fi Pro mobile hotspot , with smartphones to follow .
While most phone makers have released 5G-capable flagship handsets , with the notable exception of Apple , not all early @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 26GHz band is a step up from today ’ s mobile phone networks , health fears are unfounded and these bands have been safely used by radar and satellites for more than 50 years .
The science is clear and these 5G signals operate at far less than one per cent of maximum power levels considered safe for the general public , according to Australia ’ s radiation safety watchdog , Arpansa .
So far , Telstra has rolled out 5G coverage to selected areas in 32 major and regional cities around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it is also extending the reach of its 4G network as its 3G shutdown approaches in 2024 .
The 850MHz spectrum currently used for the 3G network , and before that 2G CDMA , will be repurposed to expand the 5G network .
In preparation for the 3G shutdown , Telstra and networking giant Ericsson have announced a world-first in doubling the range of a 4G LTE tower to 200 kilometres .
Requiring a software update rather than new hardware on mobile towers , the upgrade can eventually be rolled out across @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Telstra has committed to upgrading and expanding its 4G coverage over the next four years to a “ materially equivalent size and reach ” to its 3G footprint .
Currently , 0.3 per cent of Australia ’ s population has only 3G coverage .

Along with faster speeds, mmWave also offers lower latency, making it well-suited to the new generation of services and devices that demand quick response times, such as self-driving cars.
“More than four million people now pass through our 5G footprint and can access its benefits on any given day,” says Telstra CEO Andy Penn. “mmWave will supercharge 5G. Its higher capacity and the potential to deliver even faster speeds as well as lower latency will help power the next generation of devices and innovations.”
Along with providing 5G coverage to mobile phones, Optus is also using 5G to deliver fixed-wireless home broadband as a substitute for the NBN. In the future, mmWave 5G might also be used by Australia’s telcos to deliver fixed-wireless home broadband, reliant on an outdoor antenna, with the ability to offer gigabit download speeds 10 times faster than the typical fibre NBN connection. While Telstra will begin consumer mmWave trails in the middle of this year, wide adoption is still several years away. The 26GHz mmWave spectrum won’t be auctioned by Australia’s telecommunications regulator until next year, with Telstra bidding against rivals including Optus and the newly merged TPG/Vodafone.
Telstra’s first mmWave-compatible 5G device will be its upcoming Telstra 5G Wi-Fi Pro mobile hotspot, with smartphones to follow. While most phone makers have released 5G-capable flagship handsets, with the notable exception of Apple, not all early 5G devices support mmWave bands.