australiannationalreview--2020-08-13--THEY TELL ME AGENDA 21 IS NO LONGER A THREAT. WANNA BET?

THEY TELL ME AGENDA 21 IS NO LONGER A THREAT .
WAN NA BET ?
Every day , in meetings at all levels of government , representatives of Non-Governmental Organizations ( NGOs ) , planning groups , and federal agents surround elected representatives and insist that their policies have nothing to do with international agendas .
They regularly publish reports and rail against anyone even mentioning the names Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030 .
“ No , no , no , ” they insist .
“ Those people are just crazy conspiracy theorists .
Ours is just a local plan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ often puzzled .
Issues and policies suddenly appear in front of them with sample , ready-made legislation .
And then the unending pressure begins for them to pass it .
There is confusion , uncertainty , and then comes the herd mentality to pass legislation .
And it ’ s passed without knowledge of its origins , its purpose , and especially a lack of understanding of its consequences .
“ Just do it , ” goes the mantra .
Everyone else is doing it !
What most of these legislators fail to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this legislation has with a much larger agenda .
Most legislation interconnects with other pieces and parts contained in other bills .
Like the children ’ s song goes… ” the toe bone ’ s connected to the ankle bone… ” And it ’ s done so well , placed in innocent-sounding , positive double-speak , so that most elected representatives will argue vigorously that they passed no such global policy .
And most of all , they will answer , Agenda 21 , never heard of it .
Just local .
Just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ let me show you how it works and how the toe bone gets connected to the ankle bone ending up with the Frankenstein monster .
Here are six issues that are rarely connected to Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development ( especially when we are assured that Agenda 21 has nothing to do with local , state , or federal government policy ) .
However , these seemingly unrelated policies , once implemented , help enforce the stated Agenda 21 goal of “ reorganizing human society.
” Issue 1 : Global Warming/Climate Change .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ true scientific community that proponents have become almost hysterical in their continued attempts to enforce Climate Change policy .
Some proponents have even called for legal action against “ deniers.
” Why don ’ t they ever just question if their science is sound ?
Wouldn ’ t that be an honest action of a real scientist ?
They instead use great energy to attack any scientist who does dare ask questions or finds data contrary to the “ official ” line .
Why is it so vitally important that they continue to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say the least , questionable ?
It ’ s because all of Agenda 21/Sustainable Development policy is built on the premise that man is destroying the Earth .
Climate Change is their “ proof.
” To eliminate that premise is to remove all credibility and purpose for their entire agenda .
They are willing to go to any length , even lies , to keep the climate change foot on our throats .
On the local level this translates into planning policy that controls energy use and the efforts to cut down on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the building of expensive light rail train systems and bike paths and installation of smart meters , etc .
But don ’ t take my word for it .
I ’ ll let them speak for themselves : “ No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.
” Christine Stewart ( Former Canadian Minister of the Environment ) “ We ’ ve got to ride this global warming issue .
Even if the theory of global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.
” Timothy Wirth ( President , UN Foundation ) “ It doesn ’ t matter what is true .
It only matters what people believe is true.
” Paul Watson ( Co-Founder of Green Peace . )
Climate Change is the desperately needed excuse for Agenda 21 .
Issue 2 : Fear of over population is the central driving force behind nearly every Sustainable policy initiative .
It ’ s the real force behind Stack and Pack Smart Growth cities .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ populations are actually going down .
The only real growth in the US population in recent years has been from immigration , legal or otherwise .
Open border immigration policy is actually implementation of Agenda 21 as part of the drive to destroy national sovereignty and “ nation states.
” Environmentalists insist that the borders must be open to allow as many to immigrate here as possible .
They argue that the U.S. has a greater ability to control and protect the environment than do third world countries .
That ’ s because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our nation ’ s industry through massive environmental regulations .
So , bring ‘ em all here !
In the face of their fear of overpopulation , however , studies have shown that there is no world-wide over population crisis .
In fact one study insists that we could put the entire population of the world in an area the size of Texas with a population density of Paris , France .
Over population , and its accompanying environmental degradation , is a problem primarily in countries where the poor are deprived by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that refuse to legalize private property ownership for the masses , for example , are a primary reason for growing poverty .
Meanwhile , Sustainablists work to keep these nations from developing .
thereby keeping them poor .
Green regulations stop the building of infrastructure .
They panic at the idea of increased energy use in developing nations .
Instead of working to solve the real problems – the root of poverty- they exploit the excuse of over-population and advocate enforcing polices to drastically reduce populations .
China ’ s brutal one child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become their model .
Do you think I ’ m joking ?
Then consider these quotes from the Sustainablists : “ Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society , unless the parents hold a government license .
All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals , the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.
” David Brower ( Sierra Club ) “ A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion .
At a more frugal European @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billion would be possible.
” United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment .
A massively reduced population is he only way Agenda 21 could ever work .
Issue 3 : The destruction of the free market system .
We have heard statement after statement from the UN ; from members of Congress ; the news media ; and from Hollywood , all deriding the free market system as evil , corrupt , and a tool of the rich to hold down the poor .
So now , after deciding that the poor are expendable for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the planners are worried about them – if it leads to the Sustainabilists ’ ability to raid our bank accounts .
So are they really worried about protecting the environment – or are they actually honoring the tactics of Jesse James ?
Redistribution of wealth is behind every policy that comes out of the UN , and now every level of American government as well .
The EPA has been used as the attack dog to shut down entire industries like coal .
It has become very difficult to operate a manufacturing business @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to start a new small family-owned company as well .
Environmental protection is nearly always the excuse .
A few years ago , radical greens , wielding torches , demonstrated outside the home of the head of the Keystone pipeline company .
Now , similar radicals are burning , looting , and destroying private businesses at will .
Free enterprise has been labeled racist , selfish , and oppressive .
At the UN ’ s Rio + 20 Summit held in 2012 , the idea of “ Zero Economic Growth ” was advocated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That means no new development , nor new ideas or innovations , because such things disrupt their plans for a well-ordered society .
It was stated that even the building of new roads upsets the status quo and disrupts a well ordered society .
Such idiotic ideas are the driving force behind Sustainable Development .
Images of the deathly superstitions leading to burnings at the stake during the Dark Ages come to mind .
Yet , consider “ local ” planning programs that cut off access roads , and , again , discourage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and communities die .
Dams are torn down and farmers disappear .
Universal income , in which everyone receives the same amount from the government without producing anything , is an idea that is growing with each new emergency and lock-down the government creates .
It ’ s all Zero Economic Growth in the making .
But of course , each such program is defended as “ just local.
” Again , not my words .
Let them tell you themselves : “ We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reclaim the roads and plowed lands , halt dam construction , tear down existing dams , free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land.
” Dave Foreman , ( Earth First ) .
“ Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty , reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control ” Professor Maurice King ( Population Control Advocate ) “ We believe planning should be a tool for allocating resources…and eliminating the great inequalities of wealth and power in our society… because the free market @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Plannersnetwork.org Statement of Principles .
The American Planning Association is a member and supporter of these principles .
Free Enterprise must be stopped under Agenda 21 .
Issue 4 : Cheap Energy is the enemy of the Earth .
To the average person the drive to block any ability to obtain cheap energy makes no sense .
People are hurting economically .
Jobs are lost .
Energy costs are skyrocketing .
Yet , any attempt to drill oil , fracking of shale gas , and mining coal are all vigorously blocked by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government spends billions of dollars on “ alternative energy ” such as wind and solar , which provides less than 3 % of our energy needs .
Why ?
What is the motivation to put such shackles on the US economic engine ?
The mantra is that energy use drives up CO2 emissions and accelerates global warming .
That ’ s the excuse necessary to “ harmonize ” the US into the socialist , Sustainable global noose .
As fracking and new roll-backs on energy regulations have resulted in lower costs , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , many state and local governments are reversing the cost savings by increasing taxes on gas to keep costs high .
Lower gas prices mean people may drive more , and that goes against all Sustainable policy based on global warming .
So it must be stopped .
Then , as the prices rise from the tax increases , the “ planners ” will insist that the only solution is to enforce the building of expensive public transportation .
That , of course , is the real end game .
According to some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ energy goes beyond environmental protection , as sound economics will show that energy availability helps build opportunity and freedom of action for individuals , and removes them from the rolls of the dependent – the opposite goal of sustainable policy .
Again , here are their words : “ Giving society cheap , abundant energy is the worst thing that could ever happen to the planet.
” Prof. Paul Ehrlich ( Professor of Population Studies , Stanford University ) .
“ Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for us to discover a source of clean , cheap , abundant energy , because of what we might do with it.
” Amory Lovins ( Rocky Mountain Institute ) .
“ The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.
” Jeremy Rifkin ( Greenhouse Crisis Foundation ) .
How can we ever enact Agenda 21 if people are free to move bout on their own ?
Issue 5 : Common Core .
Many people see the reorganization of the public school issue as separate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not .
Those who are promoting what they call the Agenda for the 21st Century understand that it is going to be a long drawn out process .
To “ reform ” a nation created on the ideals of limited government , free enterprise , and individual liberty , turning it into one that unquestioningly accepts government top-down control will take time and a determined effort .
There ’ s no room in a Sustainablist society for those who believe that we were born with our rights and that government ’ s job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s selfish !
The sustainable system says government will grant us our rights so we ’ re all equal .
To enforce such a radical turn-around of our society requires that the children be indoctrinated to accept it .
The effort started in earnest in the 1990s under the Clinton Administration through the massive growth of the Department of Education in such programs as Goals 2000 , School To Work , and Workforce Development Boards .
The original American education system effectively provided an overall academic education from which students could choose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Today , the new curriculum has morphed into what is called Common Core .
It ’ s a State- run central curriculum that revamps schools into little more than job training and indoctrination centers .
Because , you see , today ’ s public education system is also designed to strip the children of their attitudes , values , and beliefs that parents may have instilled , and indoctrinate them into accepting global values – global citizenship , and a global economy based on the sustainable agenda .
Little of American civics and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ classroom .
But text books contain whole chapters on the Five Pillars of Islam , while ignoring the 10 Commandments of Christianity .
The children are fed an unending diet of the evils of capitalism ; the selfishness of individualism , and the social justice of redistribution of wealth .
It punishes students for possessing individuality and is designed to eliminate such natural human tendencies .
That is the “ common ” in Common Core .
Common values , common goals , common future .
Don ’ t rock the boat of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the nationally dictated curriculum necessary for the acceptance and implementation of Agenda 21 .
Of course , we still elect local school boards , pretending they have some say over the curriculum .
It makes us all feel safer for our children .
How , then do we explain the surge of Bernie Sanders and the Tsunami of Socialism ?
Well , today nearly every adult up to the age of 40 has gone thought this indoctrination , trained to accept a future chosen for them by someone else .
The education system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ letter to Hillary Clinton from Marc Tucker of the National Center on Education and the Economy in November , 1992 , immediately after Bill .
Clinton was elected President .
Said Tucker : “ First , a vision of the kind of national – not federal – human resources development system the nation could have .
This is interwoven with a new approach to governing that should inform that vision .
What is essential is that we create a seamless web of opportunities to develop one ’ s skills that literally extends from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system for everyone… ” coordinated by “ a system of labor market boards at the local , state , and federal levels ” where curriculum and “ job matching ” will be handled by counselors “ accessing the integrated computer-based program.
” To enforce Agenda 21 we must transform our citizens in to global village idiots .
Issue 6 : Healthcare .
How is healthcare connected to Agenda 21 ?
Simply Google “ Sustainable Medicine ” and you will find more than 5,850,000 English language references to the subject .
Read through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nearly every provision of Obamacare .
An expert on Sustainable Medicine , the late Dr. Madeleine Cosman , put it this way : “ Sustainable Medicine + Sustainable Development = Duty to Die.
” Sustainable medicine makes decisions through visioning councils that determine what shall be done , or not done , to each body in its group in its native habitat .
Sustainable medicine experts do not refer to citizens in sovereign nations , but to “ humans ” in their “ settlements.
” Sustainable medicine is the pivot around which all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 of the Rio Declaration that introduced Agenda 21 is that all humans must live in harmony with nature .
The translation means rationing healthcare , low technology for health-care treatment and emphasis on medical care not cure .
And that , of course , will lead to population reduction , as called for in Agenda 21 .
These are the issues that are not usually discussed or connected to Agenda 21 .
Yet they are being implemented , step by step , by local planners in policies that are approved by befuddled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ driven through pressure from private NGO groups and funded by federal grants .
That ’ s how it ’ s done , constantly driven with each innocent-sounding idea .
Then , without warning , Frankenstein rises from behind the smokescreen , toe bones and anklebones fully operational .
Americans must understand and connect these dots to everyday issues so they can clearly see the root and long term goals of these policies that are affecting our personal lives .
Elected representatives at every level of government must come to understand that legislative actions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Agenda 21 is the “ common core ” and it has already invaded every level of our society .
Our battle cry must be to stop this monster or watch freedom perish .

THEY TELL ME AGENDA 21 IS NO LONGER A THREAT. WANNA BET?
By Tom DeWeese
Every day, in meetings at all levels of government, representatives of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), planning groups, and federal agents surround elected representatives and insist that their policies have nothing to do with international agendas. They regularly publish reports and rail against anyone even mentioning the names Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030. “No, no, no,” they insist. “Those people are just crazy conspiracy theorists. Ours is just a local plan for this community.”
Elected Representatives are often puzzled. Issues and policies suddenly appear in front of them with sample, ready-made legislation. And then the unending pressure begins for them to pass it. There is confusion, uncertainty, and then comes the herd mentality to pass legislation. And it’s passed without knowledge of its origins, its purpose, and especially a lack of understanding of its consequences. “Just do it,” goes the mantra. Everyone else is doing it!
What most of these legislators fail to understand is the direct relationship much of this legislation has with a much larger agenda. Most legislation interconnects with other pieces and parts contained in other bills. Like the children’s song goes…”the toe bone’s connected to the ankle bone…” And it’s done so well, placed in innocent-sounding, positive double-speak, so that most elected representatives will argue vigorously that they passed no such global policy. And most of all, they will answer, Agenda 21, never heard of it. Just local. Just local. Just local.
Well, let me show you how it works and how the toe bone gets connected to the ankle bone ending up with the Frankenstein monster. Here are six issues that are rarely connected to Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development (especially when we are assured that Agenda 21 has nothing to do with local, state, or federal government policy). However, these seemingly unrelated policies, once implemented, help enforce the stated Agenda 21 goal of “reorganizing human society.”
Issue 1: Global Warming/Climate Change. It has been so discredited in the true scientific community that proponents have become almost hysterical in their continued attempts to enforce Climate Change policy. Some proponents have even called for legal action against “deniers.” Why don’t they ever just question if their science is sound? Wouldn’t that be an honest action of a real scientist? They instead use great energy to attack any scientist who does dare ask questions or finds data contrary to the “official” line. Why is it so vitally important that they continue to promote something that clearly is, to say the least, questionable?
It’s because all of Agenda 21/Sustainable Development policy is built on the premise that man is destroying the Earth. Climate Change is their “proof.” To eliminate that premise is to remove all credibility and purpose for their entire agenda. They are willing to go to any length, even lies, to keep the climate change foot on our throats.
On the local level this translates into planning policy that controls energy use and the efforts to cut down on the use of cars, enforcement of the building of expensive light rail train systems and bike paths and installation of smart meters, etc.
But don’t take my word for it. I’ll let them speak for themselves:
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” Christine Stewart (Former Canadian Minister of the Environment)
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” Timothy Wirth (President, UN Foundation)
“It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true.” Paul Watson (Co-Founder of Green Peace.)
Climate Change is the desperately needed excuse for Agenda 21.
Issue 2: Fear of over population is the central driving force behind nearly every Sustainable policy initiative. It’s the real force behind Stack and Pack Smart Growth cities.
The fact is, in developed nations, populations are actually going down. The only real growth in the US population in recent years has been from immigration, legal or otherwise. Open border immigration policy is actually implementation of Agenda 21 as part of the drive to destroy national sovereignty and “nation states.”
Environmentalists insist that the borders must be open to allow as many to immigrate here as possible. They argue that the U.S. has a greater ability to control and protect the environment than do third world countries. That’s because the Greens already have a stranglehold over our nation’s industry through massive environmental regulations. So, bring ‘em all here!
In the face of their fear of overpopulation, however, studies have shown that there is no world-wide over population crisis. In fact one study insists that we could put the entire population of the world in an area the size of Texas with a population density of Paris, France. Over population, and its accompanying environmental degradation, is a problem primarily in countries where the poor are deprived by government to improve their conditions. Nations that refuse to legalize private property ownership for the masses, for example, are a primary reason for growing poverty.
Meanwhile, Sustainablists work to keep these nations from developing. thereby keeping them poor. Green regulations stop the building of infrastructure. They panic at the idea of increased energy use in developing nations. Instead of working to solve the real problems – the root of poverty- they exploit the excuse of over-population and advocate enforcing polices to drastically reduce populations. China’s brutal one child policy of forced abortions and sterilization has become their model.
Do you think I’m joking? Then consider these quotes from the Sustainablists:
“Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” David Brower (Sierra Club)
“A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At a more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment.
A massively reduced population is he only way Agenda 21 could ever work.
Issue 3: The destruction of the free market system. We have heard statement after statement from the UN; from members of Congress; the news media; and from Hollywood, all deriding the free market system as evil, corrupt, and a tool of the rich to hold down the poor. So now, after deciding that the poor are expendable for the sake of stopping overpopulation, suddenly the planners are worried about them – if it leads to the Sustainabilists’ ability to raid our bank accounts. So are they really worried about protecting the environment – or are they actually honoring the tactics of Jesse James?
Redistribution of wealth is behind every policy that comes out of the UN, and now every level of American government as well. The EPA has been used as the attack dog to shut down entire industries like coal. It has become very difficult to operate a manufacturing business in the US, and nearly impossible to start a new small family-owned company as well. Environmental protection is nearly always the excuse. A few years ago, radical greens, wielding torches, demonstrated outside the home of the head of the Keystone pipeline company. Now, similar radicals are burning, looting, and destroying private businesses at will. Free enterprise has been labeled racist, selfish, and oppressive.
At the UN’s Rio + 20 Summit held in 2012, the idea of “Zero Economic Growth” was advocated – just to keep things fair. That means no new development, nor new ideas or innovations, because such things disrupt their plans for a well-ordered society. It was stated that even the building of new roads upsets the status quo and disrupts a well ordered society. Such idiotic ideas are the driving force behind Sustainable Development. Images of the deathly superstitions leading to burnings at the stake during the Dark Ages come to mind.
Yet, consider “local” planning programs that cut off access roads, and, again, discourage cars. The timber industry is killed and communities die. Dams are torn down and farmers disappear. Universal income, in which everyone receives the same amount from the government without producing anything, is an idea that is growing with each new emergency and lock-down the government creates. It’s all Zero Economic Growth in the making. But of course, each such program is defended as “just local.”
Again, not my words. Let them tell you themselves:
“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects. We must reclaim the roads and plowed lands, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of acres of presently settled land.” Dave Foreman, (Earth First).
“Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control” Professor Maurice King (Population Control Advocate)
“We believe planning should be a tool for allocating resources…and eliminating the great inequalities of wealth and power in our society… because the free market has proven itself incapable of doing this.” Plannersnetwork.org Statement of Principles. The American Planning Association is a member and supporter of these principles.
Free Enterprise must be stopped under Agenda 21.
Issue 4: Cheap Energy is the enemy of the Earth. To the average person the drive to block any ability to obtain cheap energy makes no sense. People are hurting economically. Jobs are lost. Energy costs are skyrocketing. Yet, any attempt to drill oil, fracking of shale gas, and mining coal are all vigorously blocked by government and green policy. Meanwhile, the government spends billions of dollars on “alternative energy” such as wind and solar, which provides less than 3% of our energy needs. Why? What is the motivation to put such shackles on the US economic engine? The mantra is that energy use drives up CO2 emissions and accelerates global warming. That’s the excuse necessary to “harmonize” the US into the socialist, Sustainable global noose.
As fracking and new roll-backs on energy regulations have resulted in lower costs, giving consumers a break at the pumps, many state and local governments are reversing the cost savings by increasing taxes on gas to keep costs high. Lower gas prices mean people may drive more, and that goes against all Sustainable policy based on global warming. So it must be stopped. Then, as the prices rise from the tax increases, the “planners” will insist that the only solution is to enforce the building of expensive public transportation. That, of course, is the real end game.
According to some anti-energy advocates, the fear of cheap energy goes beyond environmental protection, as sound economics will show that energy availability helps build opportunity and freedom of action for individuals, and removes them from the rolls of the dependent – the opposite goal of sustainable policy. Again, here are their words:
“Giving society cheap, abundant energy is the worst thing that could ever happen to the planet.” Prof. Paul Ehrlich (Professor of Population Studies, Stanford University).
“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.” Amory Lovins (Rocky Mountain Institute).
“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.” Jeremy Rifkin (Greenhouse Crisis Foundation).
How can we ever enact Agenda 21 if people are free to move bout on their own?
Issue 5: Common Core. Many people see the reorganization of the public school issue as separate from Agenda 21. It’s not. Those who are promoting what they call the Agenda for the 21st Century understand that it is going to be a long drawn out process. To “reform” a nation created on the ideals of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty, turning it into one that unquestioningly accepts government top-down control will take time and a determined effort. There’s no room in a Sustainablist society for those who believe that we were born with our rights and that government’s job is to protect those rights. That’s selfish! The sustainable system says government will grant us our rights so we’re all equal.
To enforce such a radical turn-around of our society requires that the children be indoctrinated to accept it. The effort started in earnest in the 1990s under the Clinton Administration through the massive growth of the Department of Education in such programs as Goals 2000, School To Work, and Workforce Development Boards.
The original American education system effectively provided an overall academic education from which students could choose their own futures. No longer. Today, the new curriculum has morphed into what is called Common Core. It’s a State- run central curriculum that revamps schools into little more than job training and indoctrination centers.
Because, you see, today’s public education system is also designed to strip the children of their attitudes, values, and beliefs that parents may have instilled, and indoctrinate them into accepting global values – global citizenship, and a global economy based on the sustainable agenda. Little of American civics and history are taught in today’s classroom. But text books contain whole chapters on the Five Pillars of Islam, while ignoring the 10 Commandments of Christianity. The children are fed an unending diet of the evils of capitalism; the selfishness of individualism, and the social justice of redistribution of wealth. It punishes students for possessing individuality and is designed to eliminate such natural human tendencies. That is the “common” in Common Core. Common values, common goals, common future. Don’t rock the boat of a well ordered society.
Common Core is the nationally dictated curriculum necessary for the acceptance and implementation of Agenda 21. Of course, we still elect local school boards, pretending they have some say over the curriculum. It makes us all feel safer for our children. How, then do we explain the surge of Bernie Sanders and the Tsunami of Socialism? Well, today nearly every adult up to the age of 40 has gone thought this indoctrination, trained to accept a future chosen for them by someone else.
The education system was fully outlined in a very detailed letter to Hillary Clinton from Marc Tucker of the National Center on Education and the Economy in November, 1992, immediately after Bill. Clinton was elected President.
Said Tucker: “First, a vision of the kind of national – not federal – human resources development system the nation could have. This is interwoven with a new approach to governing that should inform that vision. What is essential is that we create a seamless web of opportunities to develop one’s skills that literally extends from cradle to grave and is the same system for everyone…” coordinated by “a system of labor market boards at the local, state, and federal levels” where curriculum and “job matching” will be handled by counselors “accessing the integrated computer-based program.”
To enforce Agenda 21 we must transform our citizens in to global village idiots.
Issue 6: Healthcare. How is healthcare connected to Agenda 21? Simply Google “Sustainable Medicine” and you will find more than 5,850,000 English language references to the subject. Read through the ideas expressed there and you will find nearly every provision of Obamacare.
An expert on Sustainable Medicine, the late Dr. Madeleine Cosman, put it this way: “Sustainable Medicine + Sustainable Development = Duty to Die.” Sustainable medicine makes decisions through visioning councils that determine what shall be done, or not done, to each body in its group in its native habitat. Sustainable medicine experts do not refer to citizens in sovereign nations, but to “humans” in their “settlements.” Sustainable medicine is the pivot around which all other Sustainable Development revolves. Principle #1 of the Rio Declaration that introduced Agenda 21 is that all humans must live in harmony with nature. The translation means rationing healthcare, low technology for health-care treatment and emphasis on medical care not cure. And that, of course, will lead to population reduction, as called for in Agenda 21.
These are the issues that are not usually discussed or connected to Agenda 21. Yet they are being implemented, step by step, by local planners in policies that are approved by befuddled elected representatives. It’s all driven through pressure from private NGO groups and funded by federal grants. That’s how it’s done, constantly driven with each innocent-sounding idea. Then, without warning, Frankenstein rises from behind the smokescreen, toe bones and anklebones fully operational.
Americans must understand and connect these dots to everyday issues so they can clearly see the root and long term goals of these policies that are affecting our personal lives. Elected representatives at every level of government must come to understand that legislative actions have consequences far beyond their understanding. Agenda 21 is the “common core” and it has already invaded every level of our society. Our battle cry must be to stop this monster or watch freedom perish.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-13--Former Victorian Premier discussing Daniel Andrews and China

Jeff Kennett breaks down the ramifications of the Belt and Roads project for Australia .
Kennett says Andrews has signed @ @ @ @ @ weakens our future .
He says Andrews did not need to further deepen our good @ @ @ @ @ doing so , he has sold our soul for no purpose .
Kennett adds Andrews @ @ @ @ @ that he is misleading us .
That Andrews is massively increasing our debt and leaves @ @ @ @ @ s political expansion .
Kennett says Andrews should table the agreement in Parliament .
Kennett @ @ @ @ @ risk from China by winding this deal back

Former Victorian Premier discussing Daniel Andrews and China.
By Jennifer Barham-Floreani
Jeff Kennett breaks down the ramifications of the Belt and Roads project for Australia. Kennett says Andrews has signed an agreement with China that weakens our future. He says Andrews did not need to further deepen our good relations with China and in doing so, he has sold our soul for no purpose.
Kennett adds Andrews is not being honest, that he is misleading us. That Andrews is massively increasing our debt and leaves us vulnerable to China’s political expansion.
Kennett says Andrews should table the agreement in Parliament. Kennett says we are not at risk from China by winding this deal back


australiannationalreview--2020-08-13--Channel 7 BUSTED for Fake News in Melbourne

7NEWS Melbourne just got busted producing fake news about the current COVID-19 situation in Melbourne .
Instead of taking responsibility @ @ @ @ @ they TRIED to SCRUB it from the internet .

URGENT: JUST 7 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...


australiannationalreview--2020-08-13--“Mounting Evidence” Suggests COVID Not As Deadly as Thought. Did the Experts Fail Again?

“ Mounting Evidence ” Suggests COVID Not As Deadly as Thought .
Did the Experts Fail Again ?
In April 2005 , Charles Duelfer , the CIA ’ s top weapons inspector in Iraq , admitted in the CIA ’ s final report that after an extensive search , no weapons of mass destruction could be found .
“ After more than 18 months , the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted , ” wrote Duelfer , the leader of the Iraq Survey Group .
“ As matters now stand , the WMD investigation has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s generally accepted that the presence of WMD was the primary basis for the Iraq War .
Naturally , the absence of such weapons shook the world .
The media blamed the politicians , the politicians blamed US intel , and the intelligence actors involved mostly defended their work .
The official word , chronicled in the Robb-Silberman report , concluded that “ the Intelligence Community didn ’ t adequately explain just how little good intelligence it had—or how much its assessments were driven by assumptions and inferences rather than concrete @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is arguably the greatest expert “ fail ” in generations .
The holy triumvirate—lawmakers , bureaucrats , and media—all failed to sniff out the truth .
If any of them had , a war that cost trillions of dollars and claimed the lives of 100,000-200,000 people likely could have been avoided .
It would be difficult to surpass the Iraq blunder , but emerging evidence on COVID-19 suggests the experts—again : lawmakers , bureaucrats , and media—may have subjected us to a blunder of equally disastrous proportions .
A new NPR report suggests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been reached on a flawed premise .
Mounting evidence suggests the coronavirus is more common and less deadly than it first appeared .
The evidence comes from tests that detect antibodies to the coronavirus in a person ’ s blood rather than the virus itself .
The tests are finding large numbers of people in the US who were infected but never became seriously ill. And when these mild infections are included in coronavirus statistics , the virus appears less dangerous .
“ The current best estimates for the infection fatality risk are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” says Caitlin Rivers , an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security .
That ’ s in contrast with death rates of 5 % or more based on calculations that included only people who got sick enough to be diagnosed with tests that detect the presence of virus in a person ’ s body .
Many people will recall the fatality risk debate that took place prior to and in the early stages of the lockdowns .
There was much discussion over how deadly the virus was and what the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ The public is behaving as if this epidemic is the next Spanish flu , which is frankly understandable given that initial reports have staked COVID-19 mortality at about 2–3 percent , quite similar to the 1918 pandemic that killed tens of millions of people , ” Jeremy Samuel Faust an emergency medicine physician and an instructor at Harvard Medical School , wrote in Slate .
“ Allow me to be the bearer of good news .
These frightening numbers are unlikely to hold.
” Similarly , on March 5 vaccine expert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Maurice R. Hilleman Chair of Vaccinology at the University of Pennsylvania , told Factcheck.org that he believed that the World Health Organization ’ s 3.4 percent fatality rate figure was too high , suggesting it was well below 1 percent .
“ We ’ re more the victim of fear than the virus , ” Offit said , adding that the world was witnessing a “ wild overreaction ” to the disease .
Voices like those of Faust and Offit were quickly drowned out , however .
The 24-hour news cycle fanned collective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being done .
Runs on toilet paper and masks ensued .
Neil Ferguson , professor of mathematical biology at Imperial College London , predicted millions would die in the “ best-case scenario.
” Following the example of China , one of the most authoritarian regimes in the world , most of the developed world was placed in indefinite lockdown by their own governments .
The social and economic costs of the lockdowns soon became apparent .
The US alone has seen 40 million jobs lost , many of which aren ’ t coming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thousands of businesses have already been wiped away .
The federal debt has surged to $ 26 trillion .
Unfortunately , the COVID disaster and the aforementioned Iraq War fit a familiar pattern .
As the historian Paul Johnson has observed , most of the worst events of the 20th century were perpetrated by experts who used collective power to shape world events in a direction they believed was beneficial .
“ One of the principal lessons of our tragic century , which has seen so many millions of innocent lives sacrificed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is—beware intellectuals , ” Johnson wrote in The Intellectuals .
“ Not merely should they be kept away from the levers of power , they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.
” Nobody denies the immense cost of the lockdowns , but what was gained by them remains a subject of contention .
A May report from JP Morgan , as well as other evidence , suggests the lockdowns had little to no impact on the spread of COVID-19 .
Marko Kolanovic , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pointed out that a majority of nations saw declines in infection rates after the lockdowns were lifted .
“ Unlike rigorous testing of new drugs , lockdowns were administered with little consideration that they might not only cause economic devastation but potentially more deaths than Covid-19 itself , ” Kolanoviche said .
Similarly , a Bloomberg analysis in May found “ little correlation between the severity of a nation ’ s restrictions and whether it managed to curb excess fatalities.
” Meanwhile , Norway ’ s top health official recently stated that lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus .
On the other hand , the Washington Post this week cited studies claiming the lockdown orders prevented hundreds of millions of COVID-19 infections and saved millions of lives .
These findings come with caveats , however .
First , one of the studies was submitted on March 22—well before the vast majority of COVID cases had even occurred .
The other study was conducted by researchers at the Imperial College of London , the same school from which Ferguson hailed .
( He has since resigned after it was discovered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ helped design by allowing his married lover to come to his home . )
Ferguson , who in 2005 said up to 200 million might die from bird flu ( about 100 did ) , was asked by The New York Times in March what the best-case scenario was for the US during the COVID pandemic .
As of June 10 , Ferguson is off by about a factor of ten .
Why we should continue to listen to schools that have already proven to be so disastrously wrong is anyone ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ story comes to mind .
In 2003 , state actors led the world into a bloody , years-long struggle in Iraq to protect the world from nuclear weapons that didn ’ t exist—only to eventually learn how little US intel experts actually knew about Iraq ’ s nuclear capabilities .
In 2020 , central planners from around the world decided to shut down the global economy to protect people from an invisible , highly contagious virus that will result in no or mild symptoms for up to 90 percent of its carriers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ hard to learn .

“Mounting Evidence” Suggests COVID Not As Deadly as Thought. Did the Experts Fail Again?
By Jon Miltimore
In April 2005, Charles Duelfer, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq, admitted in the CIA’s final report that after an extensive search, no weapons of mass destruction could be found.
“After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,” wrote Duelfer, the leader of the Iraq Survey Group. “As matters now stand, the WMD investigation has gone as far as feasible.”
Today it’s generally accepted that the presence of WMD was the primary basis for the Iraq War. Naturally, the absence of such weapons shook the world. The media blamed the politicians, the politicians blamed US intel, and the intelligence actors involved mostly defended their work.
The official word, chronicled in the Robb-Silberman report, concluded that “the Intelligence Community didn’t adequately explain just how little good intelligence it had—or how much its assessments were driven by assumptions and inferences rather than concrete evidence.”
The Iraq War WMD debacle is arguably the greatest expert “fail” in generations. The holy triumvirate—lawmakers, bureaucrats, and media—all failed to sniff out the truth. If any of them had, a war that cost trillions of dollars and claimed the lives of 100,000-200,000 people likely could have been avoided.
It would be difficult to surpass the Iraq blunder, but emerging evidence on COVID-19 suggests the experts—again: lawmakers, bureaucrats, and media—may have subjected us to a blunder of equally disastrous proportions.
A new NPR report suggests the global response to COVID-19 may have been reached on a flawed premise.
Mounting evidence suggests the coronavirus is more common and less deadly than it first appeared. The evidence comes from tests that detect antibodies to the coronavirus in a person’s blood rather than the virus itself. The tests are finding large numbers of people in the US who were infected but never became seriously ill. And when these mild infections are included in coronavirus statistics, the virus appears less dangerous. “The current best estimates for the infection fatality risk are between 0.5% and 1%,” says Caitlin Rivers, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. That’s in contrast with death rates of 5% or more based on calculations that included only people who got sick enough to be diagnosed with tests that detect the presence of virus in a person’s body.
Many people will recall the fatality risk debate that took place prior to and in the early stages of the lockdowns. There was much discussion over how deadly the virus was and what the collective response to the virus should be.
Some voices exercised caution.
“The public is behaving as if this epidemic is the next Spanish flu, which is frankly understandable given that initial reports have staked COVID-19 mortality at about 2–3 percent, quite similar to the 1918 pandemic that killed tens of millions of people,” Jeremy Samuel Faust an emergency medicine physician and an instructor at Harvard Medical School, wrote in Slate. “Allow me to be the bearer of good news. These frightening numbers are unlikely to hold.”
Similarly, on March 5 vaccine expert Paul A. Offit, who holds the Maurice R. Hilleman Chair of Vaccinology at the University of Pennsylvania, told Factcheck.org that he believed that the World Health Organization’s 3.4 percent fatality rate figure was too high, suggesting it was well below 1 percent.
“We’re more the victim of fear than the virus,” Offit said, adding that the world was witnessing a “wild overreaction” to the disease.
Voices like those of Faust and Offit were quickly drowned out, however. The 24-hour news cycle fanned collective fear and outrage that more was not being done. Runs on toilet paper and masks ensued. Neil Ferguson, professor of mathematical biology at Imperial College London, predicted millions would die in the “best-case scenario.”
Following the example of China, one of the most authoritarian regimes in the world, most of the developed world was placed in indefinite lockdown by their own governments.
The social and economic costs of the lockdowns soon became apparent. The US alone has seen 40 million jobs lost, many of which aren’t coming back. Recession looms. Hundreds of thousands of businesses have already been wiped away. The federal debt has surged to $26 trillion.
Unfortunately, the COVID disaster and the aforementioned Iraq War fit a familiar pattern. As the historian Paul Johnson has observed, most of the worst events of the 20th century were perpetrated by experts who used collective power to shape world events in a direction they believed was beneficial.
“One of the principal lessons of our tragic century, which has seen so many millions of innocent lives sacrificed in schemes to improve the lot of humanity, is—beware intellectuals,” Johnson wrote in The Intellectuals. “Not merely should they be kept away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.”
Nobody denies the immense cost of the lockdowns, but what was gained by them remains a subject of contention.
A May report from JP Morgan, as well as other evidence, suggests the lockdowns had little to no impact on the spread of COVID-19.
Marko Kolanovic, a physicist and strategist for JP Morgan, pointed out that a majority of nations saw declines in infection rates after the lockdowns were lifted.
“Unlike rigorous testing of new drugs, lockdowns were administered with little consideration that they might not only cause economic devastation but potentially more deaths than Covid-19 itself,” Kolanoviche said.
Similarly, a Bloomberg analysis in May found “little correlation between the severity of a nation’s restrictions and whether it managed to curb excess fatalities.” Meanwhile, Norway’s top health official recently stated that lockdowns were not a necessary step to tame the virus.
On the other hand, the Washington Post this week cited studies claiming the lockdown orders prevented hundreds of millions of COVID-19 infections and saved millions of lives.
These findings come with caveats, however. First, one of the studies was submitted on March 22—well before the vast majority of COVID cases had even occurred. The other study was conducted by researchers at the Imperial College of London, the same school from which Ferguson hailed. (He has since resigned after it was discovered that he broke the lockdown protocol he helped design by allowing his married lover to come to his home.)
Ferguson, who in 2005 said up to 200 million might die from bird flu (about 100 did), was asked by The New York Times in March what the best-case scenario was for the US during the COVID pandemic.
“About 1.1 million deaths,” he responded.
As of June 10, Ferguson is off by about a factor of ten. Why we should continue to listen to schools that have already proven to be so disastrously wrong is anyone’s guess. The “chicken little” story comes to mind.
In 2003, state actors led the world into a bloody, years-long struggle in Iraq to protect the world from nuclear weapons that didn’t exist—only to eventually learn how little US intel experts actually knew about Iraq’s nuclear capabilities.
In 2020, central planners from around the world decided to shut down the global economy to protect people from an invisible, highly contagious virus that will result in no or mild symptoms for up to 90 percent of its carriers.
Some lessons, it seems, are hard to learn.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-13--If you’re thinking this vaccine might not be so bad you better watch this. AGENDA 2021 Forced Vaccin

If you ’ re thinking this vaccine might not be so bad you better watch this .
AGENDA 2021 Forced @ @ @ @ @ TO MANDATORY VACCINATIONS

If you’re thinking this vaccine might not be so bad you better watch this. AGENDA 2021 Forced Vaccination.
By Roz Wright
STOP SAY NO
TO MANDATORY VACCINATIONS


australiannationalreview--2020-08-13--Russia becomes the first country to approve a COVID-19 vaccine, says Putin

Russia becomes the first country to approve a COVID-19 vaccine , says Putin .
President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday that Russia had become the first country in the world to grant regulatory approval to a COVID-19 vaccine after less than two months of human testing , a move hailed by Moscow as evidence of its scientific prowess .
The development paves the way for the mass inoculation of the Russian population , even as the final stage of clinical trials to test safety and efficacy continue .
The speed at which Russia is moving to roll out its vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ race for an effective product , but has stirred concerns that it may be putting national prestige before sound science and safety .
Speaking at a government meeting on state television , Putin said the vaccine , developed by Moscow ’ s Gamaleya Institute , was safe and that it had even been administered to one of his daughters .
“ I know that it works quite effectively , forms strong immunity , and I repeat , it has passed all the needed checks , ” said Putin .
He said he hoped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine .
Its approval by the health ministry foreshadows the start of a larger trial involving thousands of participants , commonly known as a Phase III trial .
Such trials , which require a certain rate of participants catching the virus to observe the vaccine ’ s effect , are normally considered essential precursors for a vaccine to receive regulatory approval .
Regulators around the world have insisted that the rush to develop COVID-19 vaccines will not compromise safety .
But recent surveys show growing public distrust in governments ’ efforts to rapidly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ workers treating COVID-19 patients will be offered the chance of volunteering to be vaccinated soon after the vaccine ’ s approval , a source told Reuters last month .
More than 100 possible vaccines are being developed around the world to try to stop the COVID-19 pandemic .
At least four are in final Phase III human trials , according to WHO data .

Russia becomes the first country to approve a COVID-19 vaccine, says Putin.
By REUTERS
President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday that Russia had become the first country in the world to grant regulatory approval to a COVID-19 vaccine after less than two months of human testing, a move hailed by Moscow as evidence of its scientific prowess.
The development paves the way for the mass inoculation of the Russian population, even as the final stage of clinical trials to test safety and efficacy continue.
The speed at which Russia is moving to roll out its vaccine highlights its determination to win the global race for an effective product, but has stirred concerns that it may be putting national prestige before sound science and safety.
Speaking at a government meeting on state television, Putin said the vaccine, developed by Moscow’s Gamaleya Institute, was safe and that it had even been administered to one of his daughters.
“I know that it works quite effectively, forms strong immunity, and I repeat, it has passed all the needed checks,” said Putin.
He said he hoped the country would soon start mass-producing the vaccine.
Its approval by the health ministry foreshadows the start of a larger trial involving thousands of participants, commonly known as a Phase III trial.
Such trials, which require a certain rate of participants catching the virus to observe the vaccine’s effect, are normally considered essential precursors for a vaccine to receive regulatory approval.
Regulators around the world have insisted that the rush to develop COVID-19 vaccines will not compromise safety. But recent surveys show growing public distrust in governments’ efforts to rapidly produce such a vaccine.
Russian health workers treating COVID-19 patients will be offered the chance of volunteering to be vaccinated soon after the vaccine’s approval, a source told Reuters last month.
More than 100 possible vaccines are being developed around the world to try to stop the COVID-19 pandemic. At least four are in final Phase III human trials, according to WHO data.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--SURRENDER: VICTORIA POLICE RAISE THE FLAG OF COMMUNIST CHINA

No need for communist China to invade .
Victoria ’ s police have already raised the dictatorship ’ s flag @ @ @ @ @ a heavily Chinese suburb .
And guess who came to cut the cake to celebrate @ @ @ @ @ ?
Why , it ’ s Gladys Liu , the Liberal MP tied to China @ @ @ @ @ My editorial from The Bolt Report .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--Coronavirus death toll in England revised down by more than 5,000

Coronavirus death toll in England revised down by more than 5,000 .
The coronavirus death toll in England is to be revised down by more than 5,000 following concerns that over one in 10 fatalities should not have been included in the official figure .
The government announced a new UK-wide standard for how it records the official toll on Wednesday after it came to light that thousands of people in England who may have recovered from the virus before they died were still counted in the headline number .
The changes means 5,377 deaths will no longer be included @ @ @ @ @ @ @ England , resulting in a decrease in the UK total from 46,706 to 41,329 – a reduction of 11.5 % .
From now on the official government death toll will only include people who died within 28 days of testing positive for the virus , a change that brings England into line with other parts of the UK .
Previously deaths in England were included for anyone who had died following a positive coronavirus test at any point .
The government ’ s analysis of the data found 96 % of deaths occurred @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the death certificate , while 88 % of deaths occurred within 28 days of a positive test .
Daily death toll announcements were suspended in mid-July after the health secretary , Matt Hancock , announced a review of the deaths included in the government ’ s figure .
At the time , Hancock claimed the Public Health England figures were overstating the Covid-19 death toll .
There is a discrepancy between the Office for National Statistics ( ONS ) figures , which counts fatalities where Covid-19 is mentioned on the death certificate and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the PHE data , which covers deaths in hospitals or those linked to a positive Covid test .
The official PHE figures are still likely to be a significant undercount of the true death toll .
Coronavirus deaths registered by the ONS are almost a third higher than the government figure .
The new PHE figures , which cover the period to 12 August , report the death toll as 36,695 for England , while the ONS reported 49,183 that occurred by 31 July 2020 but were registered by 8 August .
However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are counted , experts have cautioned against relying solely on Covid-19 death statistics .
Excess deaths , which compares the number of deaths in a given week with the five-year average , are widely understood to be the “ gold standard ” in measuring the impact of coronavirus .
The UK has one of the highest excess death tolls in Europe .
The total number of excess deaths exceeded 65,000 across the UK between the first coronavirus deaths being recorded in mid-March and late June .
Prof David Spiegelhalter at Cambridge University ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a complex area and there is no truly ‘ correct ’ count … My real concern is with communication to the media and the public .
“ PHE have been consistently poor in clarifying both who is included as a Covid death and the inevitable delays in reporting , and their dashboard has given the strong impression that the daily count is the actual number of deaths the day before .
“ This in turn has influenced how the number is reported by the media , and is deeply misleading at this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported and the actual daily counts can be very different .
I desperately hope that PHE can do more to prevent misinterpretation , but they have got themselves into a difficult situation in adding even more complexity to the multiplicity of Covid death statistics.
” Keith Neal , an emeritus professor in the epidemiology of infectious diseases at the University of Nottingham , said the measures were sensible and brought England into line with the rest of the UK .
“ The previous measure of always being a Covid-19 death even if recovered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the number of recovered patients , particularly the very old and those with severe underlying conditions are now dying from these conditions and not Covid-19 .
“ These non Covid-19 deaths in survivors would become an ever increasing percentage of the England Covid-19 deaths being reported .
It had become essentially useless for epidemiological monitoring .
”

Coronavirus death toll in England revised down by more than 5,000.
By Pamela Duncan, Caelainn Barr and Niamh McIntyre
The coronavirus death toll in England is to be revised down by more than 5,000 following concerns that over one in 10 fatalities should not have been included in the official figure.
The government announced a new UK-wide standard for how it records the official toll on Wednesday after it came to light that thousands of people in England who may have recovered from the virus before they died were still counted in the headline number.
The changes means 5,377 deaths will no longer be included in the official total from Public Health England, resulting in a decrease in the UK total from 46,706 to 41,329 – a reduction of 11.5%.
From now on the official government death toll will only include people who died within 28 days of testing positive for the virus, a change that brings England into line with other parts of the UK. Previously deaths in England were included for anyone who had died following a positive coronavirus test at any point.
The government’s analysis of the data found 96% of deaths occurred within 60 days or had Covid-19 on the death certificate, while 88% of deaths occurred within 28 days of a positive test.
Daily death toll announcements were suspended in mid-July after the health secretary, Matt Hancock, announced a review of the deaths included in the government’s figure.
At the time, Hancock claimed the Public Health England figures were overstating the Covid-19 death toll.
There is a discrepancy between the Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures, which counts fatalities where Covid-19 is mentioned on the death certificate and include deaths in all settings, and the PHE data, which covers deaths in hospitals or those linked to a positive Covid test.
The official PHE figures are still likely to be a significant undercount of the true death toll. Coronavirus deaths registered by the ONS are almost a third higher than the government figure.
The new PHE figures, which cover the period to 12 August, report the death toll as 36,695 for England, while the ONS reported 49,183 that occurred by 31 July 2020 but were registered by 8 August.
However, due to differences in how deaths are counted, experts have cautioned against relying solely on Covid-19 death statistics. Excess deaths, which compares the number of deaths in a given week with the five-year average, are widely understood to be the “gold standard” in measuring the impact of coronavirus.
The UK has one of the highest excess death tolls in Europe. The total number of excess deaths exceeded 65,000 across the UK between the first coronavirus deaths being recorded in mid-March and late June.
Prof David Spiegelhalter at Cambridge University’s Statistical Laboratory said: “This is a complex area and there is no truly ‘correct’ count … My real concern is with communication to the media and the public.
“PHE have been consistently poor in clarifying both who is included as a Covid death and the inevitable delays in reporting, and their dashboard has given the strong impression that the daily count is the actual number of deaths the day before.
“This in turn has influenced how the number is reported by the media, and is deeply misleading at this stage of the epidemic, when the reported and the actual daily counts can be very different. I desperately hope that PHE can do more to prevent misinterpretation, but they have got themselves into a difficult situation in adding even more complexity to the multiplicity of Covid death statistics.”
Keith Neal, an emeritus professor in the epidemiology of infectious diseases at the University of Nottingham, said the measures were sensible and brought England into line with the rest of the UK.
“The previous measure of always being a Covid-19 death even if recovered was unscientific. As Covid-19 deaths fall the number of recovered patients, particularly the very old and those with severe underlying conditions are now dying from these conditions and not Covid-19.
“These non Covid-19 deaths in survivors would become an ever increasing percentage of the England Covid-19 deaths being reported. It had become essentially useless for epidemiological monitoring.”


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--ANR Founder Interview about $1 million Coronavirus challenge to the Australian Media and Government

ANR Founder Interview about $ 1 million Coronavirus challenge to the Australian Media and Government to show independent proof they @ @ @ @ @ the inflated COVID deaths .
Interview about my $ 1 million Coronavirus challenge to the @ @ @ @ @ show independent proof they aren ’ t lying about the inflated Covid deaths .
And @ @ @ @ @ not one politician or journalists willing to show proof of the Covid death tally let @ @ @ @ @ .

ANR Founder Interview about $1 million Coronavirus challenge to the Australian Media and Government to show independent proof they aren’t lying about the inflated COVID deaths.
By Jamie McIntyre
Interview about my $1 million Coronavirus challenge to the Australian Media and Government to show independent proof they aren’t lying about the inflated Covid deaths.
And yet 3 days later still not one politician or journalists willing to show proof of the Covid death tally let alone the daily case tally.
Www.australiannationalreview.com
Original source: https://www.facebook.com/100001092086344/posts/3284603831585987/?d=n


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--ROBERT DINERO EXPOSED PEDOPHILIA ENABLER SEX TRAFFICKING

By Enemy Of The Deepstate


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--Still want a CV-19 vaccine after seeing this?

Still want a CV-19 vaccine after seeing this ?


Fauci exposed

Australian National Review ’ s community of readers and following is stronger than ever .
However , advertising revenues across @ @ @ @ @ especially without a paywall .
Will you help us remain a force for good and @ @ @ @ @ government and industry ?
We want to continue on our mission to enforce a free @ @ @ @ @ day and age where mainstream media and big corporations are going all out to suppress @ @ @ @ @ without supporters donations we can ’ t fund ANR .
By supporting The Australian National @ @ @ @ @ can afford , you can help us ensure that everyone is informed of the truth @ @ @ @ @ press for years to come .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--Fauci exposed in Senate Hearing

Fauci exposed in Senate Hearing


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--Anti Government groups claim the Victorian Government is illegitimate


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--NZ has effectively been taken over

NZ has effectively been taken over

NZ has effectively been taken over .
What is this ?
So January documents say August lockdown is planned for @ @ @


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--China ranks ‘good’ and ‘bad’ citizens with ‘social credit’ system

In China , where millions of people have their faces scanned on a daily basis , authorities are developing a @ @ @ @ @ system .
Citizens ’ behavior is monitored and scrutinised – they are given scores and @ @ @ @ @ by the government .
“ Model ” citizens enjoy perks such as reduced bus fares @ @ @ @ @ scores lose certain rights and are blacklisted .


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--BILL GATES… LIAR, MURDERER, NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN A COURT OF LAW

BILL GATES… LIAR , MURDERER , NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN A COURT OF LAW .
“ Vaccines , for Bill Gates , are strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses ( including Microsoft ’ s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise ) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism .
Gates ’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans .
Promising to eradicate Polio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control of India ‘ s National Advisory Board ( NAB ) and mandated 50 polio vaccines ( up from 5 ) to every child before age 5 .
Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017 .
In 2017 , the Indian Government dialed back Gates ’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB .
Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously .
In 2017 , the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Gates ’ Vaccine Program .
The most frightening epidemics in Congo , the Philippines , and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates ’ vaccines .
By 2018 , ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates ’ vaccines .
In 2014 , the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines , developed by GSK and Merck , on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces .
Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects , including autoimmune and fertility disorders .
Seven died .
Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ girls into the trial , bullying parents , forging consent forms , and refusing medical care to the injured girls .
The case is now in the country ’ s Supreme Court .
In 2010 , the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK ’ s experimental malaria vaccine , killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis , seizure , and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children .
During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa , Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
South African newspapers complained , “ We are guinea pigs for drug makers.
” Nelson Mandela ’ s former Senior Economist , Professor Patrick Bond , describes Gates ’ philanthropic practices as “ ruthless ” and immoral ” .
In 2010 , Gates committed $ 10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population , in part , through new vaccines .
A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “ could reduce population ” .
In 2014 , Kenya ’ s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a phony “ tetanus ” vaccine campaign .
Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested .
After denying the charges , WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade .
Similar accusations came from Tanzania , Nicaragua , Mexico , and the Philippines .
A 2017 study ( Morgensen et.Al.2017 ) showed that WHO ’ s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent .
Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children .
Gates and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually .
Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO ’ s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases ; clean water , hygiene , nutrition and economic development .
They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe .
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO , UNICEF , GAVI and PATH , Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of pharmaceutical – industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda , develop fraudulent studies , conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates ’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance .
In these recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances , Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.
” Keep AWAY from vaccines .
Those in the know have been trying to warn people for years – now it ’ s coming from an ‘ important @ @ @ @ @ @ @

BILL GATES… LIAR, MURDERER, NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN A COURT OF LAW.
By Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.
Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017.
In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously.
In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program.
The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.
In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died.
Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children.
During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers.”
Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless” and immoral”.
In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”.
In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign.
Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested.
After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.
Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children.
Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually. Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development.
They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe.
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical – industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance.
In these recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.”
Keep AWAY from vaccines.
Those in the know have been trying to warn people for years – now it’s coming from an ‘important’ person maybe people will listen.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--Pt. 2 American Patriots vs The New world Order 2020 will decide the world’s fate…

Pt .
2 American Patriots vs The New world Order 2020 will decide the world ’ s fate…


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. ON THE REALITY OF OUR TIME

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. ON THE REALITY OF OUR TIME .
“ Every part of our lives will be subject to control .
This virus is about training us for submission , training us to do what we ’ re told .
To not go to the beach unless we ’ re told , to not kiss our girlfriend without their permission .
They ’ re turning us into production units and consuming entities .
They are going to rob us not only of our democracy and our liberties but our souls .
They are going to inject us with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re going to charge us for the diseases they give us .
They are going to control every part of our lives .
What we are doing at Children ’ s Health Defense is using the last instruments of democracy we have left – the Courts – to fight them .
“ We are in the last battle .
We are in the apocalypse .
We are fighting for the salvation of humanity .
We all knew this was coming , though I never believed it would come in my lifetime .
@ @ @ @ @ @

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. ON THE REALITY OF OUR TIME.
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
“Every part of our lives will be subject to control. This virus is about training us for submission, training us to do what we’re told. To not go to the beach unless we’re told, to not kiss our girlfriend without their permission. They’re turning us into production units and consuming entities. They are going to rob us not only of our democracy and our liberties but our souls. They are going to inject us with the medicines they want, and they’re going to charge us for the diseases they give us. They are going to control every part of our lives. What we are doing at Children’s Health Defense is using the last instruments of democracy we have left – the Courts – to fight them. “We are in the last battle. We are in the apocalypse. We are fighting for the salvation of humanity. We all knew this was coming, though I never believed it would come in my lifetime. But here it is.”


australiannationalreview--2020-08-14--Government will send all confirmed COVID – 19 community cases to quarantine facilities – Related con

Government will send all confirmed COVID – 19 community cases to quarantine facilities – Related concerns .
Here are my concerns : – People are inherently good law abiding citizens and do the right thing ( 99 % of society….there ’ s like 3 assholes who seem to get around a lot ) – The virus spreads like the flu … .
– People with symptoms will now be taken away to a quarantine facility away from their loved ones and in isolation and without their “ stuff ” …… this leads to mental health issues… .
– There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it are treated or lack of treatment by carers in the aged care homes .
– 67 % of Australians are considered unhealthy ( Department of Health Stat ) – Unhealthy people are more susceptible to health issues – Police have been given extra powers to enter Homes without a warrant – what happens when someone has the flu , their neighbors report them to the police ( it ’ s happening in my own street ) and with the below article they could be dragged out of the home and taken to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of time ( 2 weeks plus reinfection ) – The Tests are very in accurate … .
lots of countries are now winding back their results because of this revelation – There is no stoping Covid….. it is a here to stay and will spread and resurgence is imminent and is now part of our lives… – A Vacc1ne is a while away and there is a 75 % distrust amongst the population regarding a rushed “ cure ” – To those who say lockdown is not the answer , what is ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be dragged out of the home , What ’ s next ?

Government will send all confirmed COVID – 19 community cases to quarantine facilities – Related concerns.
By Johann Nogueira
Here are my concerns:
– People are getting CV (99.6% recover)
– People are inherently good law abiding citizens and do the right thing (99% of society….there’s like 3 assholes who seem to get around a lot)
– The virus spreads like the flu ….
– People with symptoms will now be taken away to a quarantine facility away from their loved ones and in isolation and without their “stuff” …… this leads to mental health issues….
– There are reports of how people who do have it are treated or lack of treatment by carers in the aged care homes.
– 67% of Australians are considered unhealthy (Department of Health Stat)
– Unhealthy people are more susceptible to health issues
– Police have been given extra powers to enter Homes without a warrant
– what happens when someone has the flu, their neighbors report them to the police (it’s happening in my own street) and with the below article they could be dragged out of the home and taken to a quarantine facility for an unknown amount of time (2 weeks plus reinfection)
– The Tests are very in accurate …. lots of countries are now winding back their results because of this revelation
– There is no stoping Covid….. it is a here to stay and will spread and resurgence is imminent and is now part of our lives…
– A Vacc1ne is a while away and there is a 75% distrust amongst the population regarding a rushed “cure”
– To those who say lockdown is not the answer, what is?
– If we allow our loved ones to be dragged out of the home, What’s next?


australiannationalreview--2020-08-15--Welcome to AI Tracking You for the Greater Good!

Welcome to AI Tracking You for the Greater Good !
We are now in a police state system and are in Phase 2 of its implementation .
Trump signed in F•I•V•E•G • installments and/or funding as did my governor , Laura Kelly of Kansas , because , since everyone is working from home everyone need access to technology , right ?
They are doing it all for our good !
( They are linking us to a authoritarian government and technology will track us ) .
  I ’ ve never broached this directly but I will now-there are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ F•I•V•E•G • and how it ’ s radiation affects are EXACTLY the same as C•O•V•I•D • and these studies are being removed from the internet .
  C•O•V•I•D • is not a real illness .
Read that .
  C•O•V•I•D • is not real .
  Are people dying ?
  Yes , they ’ re dying from SARS , old age , suicide , cancer , heart disease , diabetes , radiation effects , but no one is dying of the disease of C•O•V•I•D because it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus that is actually what ’ s causing these illnesses .
  The reason they are teaching us to stay 6 feet apart is not for reduction of transmission , it ’ s so we can be tracked by an AI system .
  When Five •J•E•E • is turned on and fully goes onto a grid we will see many , many more die but it ’ s going to be from radiation poisoning but will be blamed on C•O•V•I•D..   And while some still sleep , this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Welcome to AI Tracking You for the Greater Good!
By ALI ZECK
We are now in a police state system and are in Phase 2 of its implementation. Trump signed in F•I•V•E•G• installments and/or funding as did my governor, Laura Kelly of Kansas, because, since everyone is working from home everyone need access to technology, right? They are doing it all for our good! (They are linking us to a authoritarian government and technology will track us).

I’ve never broached this directly but I will now-there are hundreds of studies on the dangers of F•I•V•E•G• and how it’s radiation affects are EXACTLY the same as C•O•V•I•D• and these studies are being removed from the internet.

C•O•V•I•D• is not a real illness. Read that.

C•O•V•I•D• is not real.

Are people dying?

Yes, they’re dying from SARS, old age, suicide, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, radiation effects, but no one is dying of the disease of C•O•V•I•D because it’s never been identified or isolated as a virus that is actually what’s causing these illnesses.

The reason they are teaching us to stay 6 feet apart is not for reduction of transmission, it’s so we can be tracked by an AI system.

When Five •J•E•E• is turned on and fully goes onto a grid we will see many, many more die but it’s going to be from radiation poisoning but will be blamed on C•O•V•I•D..

And while some still sleep, this is what’s really going down.


australiannationalreview--2020-08-15--Melbourne Bachelor TV contestant Nadine Kodsi shares how Melbourne Police stalked her over excessive

Melbourne Bachelor TV contestant Nadine Kodsi shares how Melbourne Police stalked her over excessive Coronavirus lockdowns .
I was followed @ @ @ @ @ an undercover police officer , it was 10 to 8 .
He stood outside my @ @ @ @ @ the issue was having been in my driveway already .
He then accused me of @ @ @ @ @ road , which he never pulled me over for , and then when I asked @ @ @ @ @ where I was speeding , he couldn ’ t .
Provide it and said I @ @ @ @ @ , then said I failed to indicate .
I stood there filming and talking to @ @ @ @ @ , he asked for my details I refused and went to arrest me in the @ @ @ @ @ I said why you even want my details for doing nothing wrong .
He then @ @ @ @ @ get a fine in the mail and one for also being past the curfew time @ @ @ @ @ to him !
The corruption has gone beyond .

Melbourne Bachelor TV contestant Nadine Kodsi shares how Melbourne Police stalked her over excessive Coronavirus lockdowns.
By Staff Reporter
I was followed home the other day by an undercover police officer, it was 10 to 8.
He stood outside my house. I asked what the issue was having been in my driveway already. He then accused me of speeding 5 mins down the road, which he never pulled me over for, and then when I asked him to show me proof where I was speeding, he couldn’t. Provide it and said I never said you were speeding, then said I failed to indicate. I stood there filming and talking to him for over 10 mins, he asked for my details I refused and went to arrest me in the most aggressive way possible. I said why you even want my details for doing nothing wrong. He then proceeded to say I would get a fine in the mail and one for also being past the curfew time because I stood outside talking to him! The corruption has gone beyond.