russia-insider--2020-06-09--RIP Jon Hellevig, Economist and Long Time 'Russia Insider' Author and Friend

Jon was a fan of Russia Insider from day one and contributed great articles and advice over the years .
His economic analyses of Russia were invaluable , seeking to debunk the relentless slander of the mainstream media with real facts and statistics proving that Russia was doing much better than people thought .
You can see the archive of his many of dozens of articles here , going back to the Fall of 2014 when Russia Insider was launched .
Over the years he became a trusted friend in Moscow .
He was a great man , and will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jon , you are , no doubt , in a better place now .
Below are reports on Jon 's passing from around the alt-media .
From the Editor of Anti-Empire : I chatted with Jon just weeks before he would pass away .
He submitted a story for the site , and I created an account for him so he could do so even more easily in the future , but it was not to be as he was unexpectedly taken away from us almost right after .
I read his in-depth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and probably you did too , perhaps the reproductions I posted to Russia Insider when I was there , and since then to this site .
He was a great friend of the Russian people and invaluable to the Russian-watching community for his knowledge , energy and instincts alike He was optimistic and passionate about Russia ’ s fortunes , and in his last days he was upset and nervous that Russia had committed a great error in opting for a lockdown , but he comforted himself with his analysis that Russia nonetheless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on itself as some of the countries .
Rest in peace , Jon , you are missed .
Jon Hellevig , a well-known and respected lawyer , economics expert and policy commentator on many continents , died in his hometown of Moscow on May 26 , 2020 .
It is our sad duty to inform the audience that international expert , political commentator , author , journalist and a philosopher Jon Hellevig , died of a seizure 26th May 2020 in his Hometown Moscow .
Jon Hellevig had sought treatment for heart complications @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t fallen ill. Jon Hellevig was a prominent thinker , financial expert , journalist and philosopher .
He was an internationally influential Finn who appeared as a commentator , e.g .
In the Chinese and Russian media , and had a wide circle of friends on all continents .
The proverb “ no one is a prophet in his own country ” is well suited to Hellevig .
Jon mourned the departure of Ilja Janitskin , who died on February 7 , 2020 .
At the news of his death , Hellevig @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ilja and linked the attached video to it .
UMV magazine takes part in the grief of Joni and Ilja ’ s relatives .
Jon and Ilja had to suffer to keep the word free .
Thanks to them , there is still freedom of speech .
Jon and Ilja are now together , on the better side and watching us .
Let us be worthy of them !
Jon Hellevig was born in Helsinki , Finland , February 26th 1962 .
Shortly before his death he complained of heart complications and went @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he did not have a corona infection , despite the pandemic .
Jon was a remarkable multi-talented Finn and a political thinker who had friends and colleagues in all Continents .
The proverb “ no one is a prophet in their own land ” fits him well .
He defended human rights and freedom of speech .
When the persecuted Finnish editor Ilya Janitskin died on February 7h 2020 , Jon mourned and posted this poem and video .
Unfortunately , Jon soon followed him .
We send our Deepest condolences to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jon and Ilya suffered for our freedom of speech and both died after Cruel political persecution by Finnish authorities .
Jon and Ilya sacrificed their most precious , their lives , to defend our freedom of speech .
Let us and our children always remember them and let us be worthy of them !
When our friend The Saker asked if either Intibah or I would like to write a necrologue for Jon Hellevig , we both felt we couldn ’ t give the request enough justice , because we didn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decided to take the lead here and write it in my name , with Intibah ’ s help , I realized that I knew Jon enough to honour his legacy by relaying my short sad and sweet experience with him to my readers .
Jon was initially a Facebook friend whom we ‘ met ’ over the fight for Syria ’ s sovereignty and independence .
When Intibah and I decided to visit Moscow in the spring of 2015 , arrangements were made to meet in the flesh .
And after a long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a taxi trip to the hotel , Intibah noticed him sitting in the lobby waiting for us .
As he stood up to shake our hands , I felt dwarfed by this imposing gentle giant as my height could hardly reach his shoulder , and quickly , we took our luggage to the room , put a band aid on our flight fatigue , and went out with him for a walk around central Moscow .
We had a wonderful evening together and he insisted to pay for dinner .
Jon was excited @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was the first real warm spring day in Moscow .
The traditional Russian winter lockdown locked up his free spirit and made him feel imprisoned in a cage , as he put it .
He loved spring and what it symbolizes , because Jon was full of life , full of ideas , positivity , and wishes for a better world .
The last thing I imagined back then was that only five years later I would be sitting down writing his eulogy .
In writing this , I don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a dear friend , but I also want to express the grief I feel , as this may help me self-heal and fill that deep sinking hole that his untimely death has created in my heart and soul .
For more than the five years since we met in the flesh , Jon was my mentor even though he was seven years my junior .
I looked up to his vast knowledge and wisdom at many levels .
He was a deep thinker with an amazing intellect , and extremely good with numbers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real economics of the world .
He was also Intibah ’ s mentor on ‘ forensics ’ .
Intibah ’ s unofficial professional title is the ‘ forensic journalist ’ , and she and Jon worked together on many ’ investigations ’ .
Jon loathed injustice , spoke strongly , fearlessly and vehemently against oppressors of all sizes .
He spoke so openly that he lost many ‘ friends ’ along the way because diplomacy was not a forté with which he was blessed .
Quite the contrary in fact , if he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him stupid , moron , idiot , and he did not shy away from using more colourful language , and often made me laugh as he did ; and this was because when he resorted to such language , it was justified and in him doing so , he expressed my angry side that I often keep the lid on .
He loved Russia .
He adored Russia and chose it to be his home even though he was Finnish .
He travelled extensively in Russia whilst he lived in Moscow , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ especially Sochi .
He made many trips to Donbas to see what was happening on the ground with his own eyes .
And a few years ago , he met another great friend in India , Arun Shrivastava .
Sadly , Arun passed away not long after leaving behind an important manuscript he wrote on the role of nefarious NGO ’ s .
Intibah and I worked with Jon trying to salvage his work and have it published , but the single original copy of that work instead reached the hands of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have it translated to many languages and published .
In hindsight , all he actually wanted to do was to put his filthy hands on it and make sure it never sees the light .
That was such a disappointment for Jon and us .
It is such a travesty that Arun ’ s work was confiscated by that slime of a human… I seem to be picking up some of Jon ’ s vocabulary already .
This year , sweet Jon did not get his spring .
The COVID-19 lockdown locked up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into deep and agonizing depression .
For many people , this is something they can tolerate , but not for a soul that thrives on light and freedom .
The flower was not allowed to blossom .
Flowers do not grow in the dark .
Jon was no stranger to depression , and before his heart stopped , Intibah and I felt from his writings that he wasn ’ t well .
We spoke to him on the 17th of May for over an hour .
He was touched to hear our voices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him and loved him .
His pain was impossible to hide , but so was his hope and intention to come and visit us soon when this kerfuffle was over .
In the conversation , he made reference to similarities between himself and Kafka .
I didn ’ t know much about Kafka and I am not going to pretend to be an instant expert on him after a quick Google job .
But that analogy reminded me of my mother who lived the pain and suffering of French poet Lamartine for her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , how can one forget Edgar Allan Poe ?
Such is the case of gentle souls .
We were planning to speak to him again , but didn ’ t want to inundate him with calls enough to make him feel we were worried and raise his concern .
In hindsight , we wish we did .
We still don ’ t know where and when Jon ’ s body was ‘ discovered ’ as he lived alone .
What we do know is that he died on the 26th of May of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 58 with still so much to give .
It is such a tragedy to realize that dear Jon was an inadvertent victim of COVID-19 .
The lockdown stifled his free spirit , and his heart gave up , because Jon lived up to his principles in every part of his body and mind .
Pretence was not in his dictionary .
Jon my friend , forgive me for I can not attend your funeral , but with these words , I let you rest in peace .
Farewell .

Jon was a fan of Russia Insider from day one and contributed great articles and advice over the years. His economic analyses of Russia were invaluable, seeking to debunk the relentless slander of the mainstream media with real facts and statistics proving that Russia was doing much better than people thought.
You can see the archive of his many of dozens of articles here, going back to the Fall of 2014 when Russia Insider was launched. Over the years he became a trusted friend in Moscow. He was a great man, and will be missed.
Fly with the angels Jon, you are, no doubt, in a better place now.
Below are reports on Jon's passing from around the alt-media.
He was optimistic and passionate about Russia’s fortunes, and in his last days he was upset and nervous that Russia had committed a great error in opting for a lockdown, but he comforted himself with his analysis that Russia nonetheless did not inflict as much lockdown damage on itself as some of the countries.
I read his in-depth economic analyses on Russia for years, and probably you did too, perhaps the reproductions I posted to Russia Insider when I was there, and since then to this site.
From the Editor of Anti-Empire: I chatted with Jon just weeks before he would pass away. He submitted a story for the site , and I created an account for him so he could do so even more easily in the future, but it was not to be as he was unexpectedly taken away from us almost right after.
We send our Deepest condolences to the relatives of both Jon and Ilya. Jon and Ilya suffered for our freedom of speech and both died after Cruel political persecution by Finnish authorities. Jon and Ilya sacrificed their most precious, their lives, to defend our freedom of speech. Let us and our children always remember them and let us be worthy of them!
Jon was a remarkable multi-talented Finn and a political thinker who had friends and colleagues in all Continents. The proverb “no one is a prophet in their own land” fits him well. He defended human rights and freedom of speech.
Jon Hellevig was born in Helsinki, Finland, February 26th 1962. Shortly before his death he complained of heart complications and went to see a doctor. However, he did not have a corona infection, despite the pandemic.
UMV magazine takes part in the grief of Joni and Ilja’s relatives. Jon and Ilja had to suffer to keep the word free. Thanks to them, there is still freedom of speech. Jon and Ilja are now together, on the better side and watching us. Let us be worthy of them!
Jon mourned the departure of Ilja Janitskin, who died on February 7, 2020 . At the news of his death, Hellevig published the following poem in memory of Ilja and linked the attached video to it.
Jon Hellevig was a prominent thinker, financial expert, journalist and philosopher. He was an internationally influential Finn who appeared as a commentator, e.g. In the Chinese and Russian media, and had a wide circle of friends on all continents. The proverb “no one is a prophet in his own country” is well suited to Hellevig.
When our friend The Saker asked if either Intibah or I would like to write a necrologue for Jon Hellevig, we both felt we couldn’t give the request enough justice, because we didn’t know Jon enough. But as I decided to take the lead here and write it in my name, with Intibah’s help, I realized that I knew Jon enough to honour his legacy by relaying my short sad and sweet experience with him to my readers.
Jon was initially a Facebook friend whom we ‘met’ over the fight for Syria’s sovereignty and independence. When Intibah and I decided to visit Moscow in the spring of 2015, arrangements were made to meet in the flesh. And after a long and tedious flight from Hong Kong and a taxi trip to the hotel, Intibah noticed him sitting in the lobby waiting for us.
As he stood up to shake our hands, I felt dwarfed by this imposing gentle giant as my height could hardly reach his shoulder, and quickly, we took our luggage to the room, put a band aid on our flight fatigue, and went out with him for a walk around central Moscow. We had a wonderful evening together and he insisted to pay for dinner.
Jon was excited not only to see us, but it was the first real warm spring day in Moscow. The traditional Russian winter lockdown locked up his free spirit and made him feel imprisoned in a cage, as he put it. He loved spring and what it symbolizes, because Jon was full of life, full of ideas, positivity, and wishes for a better world.
The last thing I imagined back then was that only five years later I would be sitting down writing his eulogy.
In writing this, I don’t only want to mark my respect to a dear friend, but I also want to express the grief I feel, as this may help me self-heal and fill that deep sinking hole that his untimely death has created in my heart and soul.
For more than the five years since we met in the flesh, Jon was my mentor even though he was seven years my junior. I looked up to his vast knowledge and wisdom at many levels. He was a deep thinker with an amazing intellect, and extremely good with numbers when it came to economics; the real economics of the world. He was also Intibah’s mentor on ‘forensics’. Intibah’s unofficial professional title is the ‘forensic journalist’, and she and Jon worked together on many ’investigations’.
Jon loathed injustice, spoke strongly, fearlessly and vehemently against oppressors of all sizes. He spoke so openly that he lost many ‘friends’ along the way because diplomacy was not a forté with which he was blessed. Quite the contrary in fact, if he thought one was stupid; he called him stupid, moron, idiot, and he did not shy away from using more colourful language, and often made me laugh as he did; and this was because when he resorted to such language, it was justified and in him doing so, he expressed my angry side that I often keep the lid on.
He loved Russia. He adored Russia and chose it to be his home even though he was Finnish. He travelled extensively in Russia whilst he lived in Moscow, he absolutely loved the Black Sea region; especially Sochi. He made many trips to Donbas to see what was happening on the ground with his own eyes. And a few years ago, he met another great friend in India, Arun Shrivastava. Sadly, Arun passed away not long after leaving behind an important manuscript he wrote on the role of nefarious NGO’s. Intibah and I worked with Jon trying to salvage his work and have it published, but the single original copy of that work instead reached the hands of a former ‘friend’ who promised to have it translated to many languages and published. In hindsight, all he actually wanted to do was to put his filthy hands on it and make sure it never sees the light. That was such a disappointment for Jon and us. It is such a travesty that Arun’s work was confiscated by that slime of a human… I seem to be picking up some of Jon’s vocabulary already.
This year, sweet Jon did not get his spring. The COVID-19 lockdown locked up his heart and mind and sent him into deep and agonizing depression. For many people, this is something they can tolerate, but not for a soul that thrives on light and freedom. The flower was not allowed to blossom. Flowers do not grow in the dark.
Jon was no stranger to depression, and before his heart stopped, Intibah and I felt from his writings that he wasn’t well. We spoke to him on the 17th of May for over an hour. He was touched to hear our voices and to know that we cared for him and loved him. His pain was impossible to hide, but so was his hope and intention to come and visit us soon when this kerfuffle was over.
In the conversation, he made reference to similarities between himself and Kafka. I didn’t know much about Kafka and I am not going to pretend to be an instant expert on him after a quick Google job. But that analogy reminded me of my mother who lived the pain and suffering of French poet Lamartine for her entire life. And speaking of Lamartine, how can one forget Edgar Allan Poe? Such is the case of gentle souls.
We were planning to speak to him again, but didn’t want to inundate him with calls enough to make him feel we were worried and raise his concern. In hindsight, we wish we did.
We still don’t know where and when Jon’s body was ‘discovered’ as he lived alone. What we do know is that he died on the 26th of May of a heart attack at the prime age of 58 with still so much to give.
It is such a tragedy to realize that dear Jon was an inadvertent victim of COVID-19. The lockdown stifled his free spirit, and his heart gave up, because Jon lived up to his principles in every part of his body and mind. Pretence was not in his dictionary.
Jon my friend, forgive me for I cannot attend your funeral, but with these words, I let you rest in peace. Farewell.
Source: The Saker


russia-insider--2020-06-10--Some Top Russian Liberals Are Wary of an Alliance With China - They Are Wrong

If there were a Russian version of the website PropOrNot , Academician Alexei Arbatov could find himself listed there as “ American agent/dupe.
” Arbatov directs the International Security Center of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences .
He demonstrates his Washington leanings by his recommendation that Russia avoid a strategic alliance with China .
This , of course , is a Washington position .
It seems curious coming from a Russian security expert at a time when US foreign policy is dominated by neoconservatives who are hostile to both Russia and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to American hegemony .
Washington demonizes both Russia and China , imposes sanctions and threats , conducts aggressive military maneuvers in the spheres of influence of both countries , dismisses the Russian president as “ the new Hitler , ” threatens China with a trade war , and blames China for the coronavirus and threatens to make China pay for it .
Confronted by such a hostile and unreasonable power as the US presents itself to be , a strategic alliance between Russia and China seems to be precisely what is required in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intentions .
With the American organized and financed Hong Kong riots and efforts to destabilize a Chinese province and with the neoconservatives ’ intention of overthrowing the Iranian government and sending jihadists into the Russian Federation , Washington has demonstrated its intention to destabilize first one country and then the other .
A common front evidenced by a strategic alliance would represent power greater than Washington and prevent Washington miscalculations that could lead to the outbreak of war .
Why is Arbatov opposed to such a desirable result ?
Why does he want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from China ?
Does he trust Washington more than China ?
He gives this answer : A half century ago the Soviet Union “ officially proclaimed in its program that China was the greatest threat to the world .
We can not go back and forth between extremes , from China being the world ’ s greatest threat to it being our strategic ally or partner .
One can not play with such concepts .
A strategic ally is when you are ready to send your soldiers to fight for the interests of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am confident that we don ’ t have and will not have such a situation with China.
” What strategic sense does it make for Arbatov to use a minor conflict of a half century ago between China and a government and country that no longer exist to discourage a strategic alliance that would prevent a much more serious conflict today ?
One possible answer is that some Russians , despite Washington ’ s demonstrated aggressive intentions toward Russia , are more enamored of America than they are of China .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s greatest threat .
Arbatov is not alone in his view .
A number of Russian experts believe that Russia should not get too close to China whose economic position they believe is stronger than Russia ’ s .
They fear that a close relationship would result in Russia becoming a servant of China ’ s , with the Russian economy being limited to being a source of natural resources .
Russia ’ s experts should remember that it is Washington ’ s plan to limit the Russian economy to the export @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Europe .
Do the experts who are discouraging alliance with China prefer for Russia to be Washington ’ s servant ?
The prevention of a strategic alliance between Russia and China is essential to US hegemony .
Russians should avoid being manipulated into a fear of China that exposes them to the danger of being Washington ’ s servant .
A strategic alliance is the best way for Russia and China to protect themselves from Washington ’ s machinations .
It makes sense for Russia , threatened as it is by Washington , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other countries .
Russia ’ s concession to Norway in the Barents Sea , to China over an island in the Amur River , and consideration of Japan ’ s request for the return of the Kuril Islands are marks of thoughtful diplomacy .
Whatever the basis for Russian distrust of China , it makes less sense for Russia to trust Washington , which continues to prepare the path for war by dismantling the last remaining agreements put in place to ensure peace .
Nothing is more important to Russia and China , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solid alliance between Russia and China .
This is the best way for the two countries to protect their sovereignty and perhaps the only way of preventing the drive for American hegemony from resulting in nuclear war .
If Russians can not understand this , they are doomed along with the rest of us .

If there were a Russian version of the website PropOrNot, Academician Alexei Arbatov could find himself listed there as “American agent/dupe.”
Arbatov directs the International Security Center of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He demonstrates his Washington leanings by his recommendation that Russia avoid a strategic alliance with China. This, of course, is a Washington position. It seems curious coming from a Russian security expert at a time when US foreign policy is dominated by neoconservatives who are hostile to both Russia and China because the two countries are obstacles to American hegemony.
Arbatov is the typical Russian liberal, aping what the neocons in the West are pushing. He is the son of the famous Soviet American expert and foreign policy heavy, Georgy Arbatov. Like many Russian liberals, Alexei is a child of privilege.
Washington demonizes both Russia and China, imposes sanctions and threats, conducts aggressive military maneuvers in the spheres of influence of both countries, dismisses the Russian president as “the new Hitler,” threatens China with a trade war, and blames China for the coronavirus and threatens to make China pay for it.
Confronted by such a hostile and unreasonable power as the US presents itself to be, a strategic alliance between Russia and China seems to be precisely what is required in order to deter Washington from its hostile intentions. With the American organized and financed Hong Kong riots and efforts to destabilize a Chinese province and with the neoconservatives’ intention of overthrowing the Iranian government and sending jihadists into the Russian Federation, Washington has demonstrated its intention to destabilize first one country and then the other. A common front evidenced by a strategic alliance would represent power greater than Washington and prevent Washington miscalculations that could lead to the outbreak of war.
Why is Arbatov opposed to such a desirable result? Why does he want Russia “to keep its distance” from China? Does he trust Washington more than China?
He gives this answer: A half century ago the Soviet Union “officially proclaimed in its program that China was the greatest threat to the world. We cannot go back and forth between extremes, from China being the world’s greatest threat to it being our strategic ally or partner. One cannot play with such concepts. A strategic ally is when you are ready to send your soldiers to fight for the interests of your ally, and vice versa. I am confident that we don’t have and will not have such a situation with China.”
What strategic sense does it make for Arbatov to use a minor conflict of a half century ago between China and a government and country that no longer exist to discourage a strategic alliance that would prevent a much more serious conflict today? One possible answer is that some Russians, despite Washington’s demonstrated aggressive intentions toward Russia, are more enamored of America than they are of China. The romanticism of the Atlanticist Integrationists remains Russia’s greatest threat.
Arbatov is not alone in his view. A number of Russian experts believe that Russia should not get too close to China whose economic position they believe is stronger than Russia’s. They fear that a close relationship would result in Russia becoming a servant of China’s, with the Russian economy being limited to being a source of natural resources.
Russia’s experts should remember that it is Washington’s plan to limit the Russian economy to the export of raw materials except for energy to Europe. Do the experts who are discouraging alliance with China prefer for Russia to be Washington’s servant? The prevention of a strategic alliance between Russia and China is essential to US hegemony. Russians should avoid being manipulated into a fear of China that exposes them to the danger of being Washington’s servant. A strategic alliance is the best way for Russia and China to protect themselves from Washington’s machinations.
It makes sense for Russia, threatened as it is by Washington, to make friends and build bridges to other countries. Russia’s concession to Norway in the Barents Sea, to China over an island in the Amur River, and consideration of Japan’s request for the return of the Kuril Islands are marks of thoughtful diplomacy. Whatever the basis for Russian distrust of China, it makes less sense for Russia to trust Washington, which continues to prepare the path for war by dismantling the last remaining agreements put in place to ensure peace. Nothing is more important to Russia and China, and to world peace, than a solid alliance between Russia and China. This is the best way for the two countries to protect their sovereignty and perhaps the only way of preventing the drive for American hegemony from resulting in nuclear war. If Russians cannot understand this, they are doomed along with the rest of us.


russia-insider--2020-06-10--FBI Launches Open Attack on Alternative Media Outlets Challenging US Foreign Policy

Under FBI orders , Facebook and Google removed American Herald Tribune , an alternative site that publishes US and European writers critical of US foreign policy .
The bureau ’ s justification for the removal was dubious , and it sets a troubling precedent for other critical outlets .
The FBI has publicly justified its suppression of dissenting online views about US foreign policy if a media outlet can be somehow linked to one of its adversaries .
The Bureau ’ s justification followed a series of instances in which Silicon Valley social media platforms banned accounts following consultations with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case in 2018 , the FBI encouraged Facebook , Instagram and Google to remove or restrict ads on the American Herald Tribune ( AHT ) , an online journal that published critical opinion articles on US policy toward Iran and the Middle East .
The bureau has never offered a clear rationale , however , despite its private discussions with Facebook on the ban .
The FBI ’ s first step toward intervening against dissenting views on social media took place in October 2017 with the creation of a Foreign Influence Task Force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Counterintelligence Division .
Next , the FBI defined any effort by states designated by the Department of Defense as major adversaries ( Russia , China , Iran and North Korea ) to influence American public opinion as a threat to US national security .
In February 2020 , the FBI defined that threat in much more specific terms and implied that it would act against any online media outlet that was found to fall within its ambit .
At a conference on election security on February 24 , David K. Porter , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Foreign Influence Task Force , defined what the FBI described as “ malign foreign influence activity ” as “ actions by a foreign power to influence U.S. policy , distort political sentiment and public discourse.
” Porter described “ information confrontation ” as a force “ designed to undermine public confidence in the credibility of free and independent news media.
” Those who practice this dark craft , he said , seek to “ push consumers to alternative news sources , ” where “ it ’ s much easier to introduce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubt and confusion about the true narratives by exploiting the media landscape to introduce conflicting story lines.
” “ Information confrontation ” , however , is simply the literal Russian translation of the term “ information warfare.
” Its use by the FTIF appears to be aimed merely at justifying an FBI role in seeking to suppress what it calls “ alternative news sources ” under any set of circumstances it can justify .
While expressing his intention to target alternative media , Porter simultaneously denied that the FBI was concerned about censoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ doesn ’ t go around chasing content .
We don ’ t focus on what the actors say.
” Instead , he insisted that “ attribution is key , ” suggesting that the FTIF was only interested in finding hidden foreign government actors at work .
Thus the question of “ attribution ” has become the FBI ’ s key lever for censoring alternative media that publishes critical content on U.S. foreign policy , or which attacks mainstream and corporate media narratives .
If an outlet can be somehow linked to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ platforms is fair game for the feds .
In 2018 , Facebook deleted the Facebook page of the American Herald Tribune ( AHT ) , a website that publishes commentary from an array of notable authors who are harshly critical of U.S. foreign policy .
Gmail , which is run by Google , quickly followed suit by removing ads linked to the outlet , while the Facebook-owned Instagram scrubbed AHT ’ s account altogether .
Tribune editor Anthony Hall reported at the time that the removals occurred at the end of August 2018 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the move by Facebook .
Nor was it reported by the corporate news media until January 2020 , when CNN elicited a confirmation from a Facebook spokesman that it had indeed done so in 2018 .
Furthermore , the FBI was advising Facebook on both Iranian and Russian sites that were banned during that same period of a few days .
As Facebook ’ s chief security officer Alex Stamos noted on July 21 , 2018 , “ We have proactively reported our technical findings to US law enforcement , because they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and may in time be in a position to provide public attribution.
” On August 2 , a few days following the removal of AHT and two weeks after hundreds of Russian and Iranian Pages had been removed by Facebook , FBI Director Christopher Wray told reporters at a White House briefing that FBI officials had “ met with top social media and technology companies several times ” during the year , “ providing actionable intelligence to better enable them to address abuse of their platforms by foreign actors.
” He remarked that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indicators and account information so they can better monitor their own platforms.
” Cybersecurity firm FireEye , which boasts that it has contracts to support “ nearly every department in the United States government , ” and which has been used by Department of Homeland Security as a primary source of “ threat intelligence , ” also influenced Facebook ’ s crackdown on the Tribune .
CNN cited an unnamed official of FireEye stating that the company had “ assessed ” with “ moderate confidence ” that the AHT ’ s website was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a larger influence operation.
” The CNN author was evidently unaware that in U.S. intelligence parlance “ moderate confidence ” suggests a near-total absence of genuine conviction .
As the 2011 official “ consumer ’ s guide ” to US intelligence explained , the term “ moderate confidence ” generally indicates that either there are still differences of view in the intelligence community on the issue or that the judgment ” is credible and plausible but not sufficiently corroborated to warrant higher level of confidence.
” CNN also quoted FireEye official Lee @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , both technical and behavioral ” showed that American Herald Tribune was part of the larger influence operation .
The CNN story linked to a study published by FireEye featuring a “ map ” showing how Iranian-related media were allegedly linked to one another , primarily by similarities in content .
But CNN apparently hadn ’ t bothered to read the study , which did not once mention the American Herald Tribune .
Finally , the CNN piece cited a 2018 tweet by Daily Beast contributor Josh Russell which it said provided “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s alleged links to Iran.
” In fact , his tweet merely documented the AHT ’ s sharing of an internet hosting service with another pro-Iran site “ at some point in time.
” Investigators familiar with the problem know that two websites using the same hosting service , especially over a period of years , is not a reliable indicator of a coherent organizational connection .
CNN did find evidence of deception over the registration of the AHT .
The outlet ’ s editor , Anthony Hall , continues to give the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journalists and others ( including this writer ) , are contributors , despite the fact that their articles have been republished from other sources without permission .
However , AHT has one characteristic that differentiates it from the others that have been kicked off Facebook : The American and European authors who have appeared in its pages are all real and are advancing their own authentic views .
Some are sympathetic to the Islamic Republic , but others are simply angry about U.S. policies : Some are Libertarian anti-interventionists ; others are supporters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conspiracy theories .
One notable independent contributor to AHT is Philip Giraldi , an 18-year veteran of the CIA ’ s Clandestine Service and and an articulate critic of US wars in the Middle East and of Israeli influence on American policy and politics .
From its inception in 2015 , the AHT has been edited by Anthony Hall , Professor Emeritus at University of Lethbridge in Alberta , Canada .
In announcing yet another takedown of Iranian Pages in October 2018 , Facebook ’ s Gleicher declared that “ coordinated inauthentic behavior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ create networks of accounts to mislead others about who they are what they ’ re doing.
” That certainly doesn ’ t apply to those who provided the content for the American Herald Tribune .
Thus the takedown of the publication by Facebook , with FBI and FireEye encouragement represents a disturbing precedent for future actions against individuals who criticize US foreign policy and outlets that attack corporate media narratives .
Shelby Pierson , the CIA official appointed by then director of national intelligence in July 2019 to chair the inter-agency “ Election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to hint at differences in the criteria employed by his agency and the FBI on foreign and alternative media .
In an interview with former acting CIA Director Michael Morrell in February , Pierson said , “ [ P ] articularly on the [ foreign ] influence side of the house , when you ’ re talking about blended content with First Amendment-protected speech…against the backdrop of a political paradigm and you ’ re involving yourself in those activities , I think that makes it more complicated ” ( emphasis added ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s methods of online media suppression , she added that the position in question “ doesn ’ t have the same unanimity that we have in the counterterrorism context.
” Gareth Porter is an independent investigative journalist who has covered national security policy since 2005 and was the recipient of Gellhorn Prize for Journalism in 2012 .
His most recent book is The CIA Insider ’ s Guide to the Iran Crisis co-authored with John Kiriakou , just published in February .

Under FBI orders, Facebook and Google removed American Herald Tribune, an alternative site that publishes US and European writers critical of US foreign policy. The bureau’s justification for the removal was dubious, and it sets a troubling precedent for other critical outlets.
The FBI has publicly justified its suppression of dissenting online views about US foreign policy if a media outlet can be somehow linked to one of its adversaries. The Bureau’s justification followed a series of instances in which Silicon Valley social media platforms banned accounts following consultations with the FBI.
In a particularly notable case in 2018, the FBI encouraged Facebook, Instagram and Google to remove or restrict ads on the American Herald Tribune (AHT), an online journal that published critical opinion articles on US policy toward Iran and the Middle East. The bureau has never offered a clear rationale, however, despite its private discussions with Facebook on the ban.
The FBI’s first step toward intervening against dissenting views on social media took place in October 2017 with the creation of a Foreign Influence Task Force (FTIF) in the bureau’s Counterintelligence Division. Next, the FBI defined any effort by states designated by the Department of Defense as major adversaries (Russia, China, Iran and North Korea) to influence American public opinion as a threat to US national security.
In February 2020, the FBI defined that threat in much more specific terms and implied that it would act against any online media outlet that was found to fall within its ambit. At a conference on election security on February 24, David K. Porter, who identified himself as Assistant Section Chief of the Foreign Influence Task Force, defined what the FBI described as “malign foreign influence activity” as “actions by a foreign power to influence U.S. policy, distort political sentiment and public discourse.”
Porter described “information confrontation” as a force “designed to undermine public confidence in the credibility of free and independent news media.” Those who practice this dark craft, he said, seek to “push consumers to alternative news sources,” where “it’s much easier to introduce false narratives” and thus “sow doubt and confusion about the true narratives by exploiting the media landscape to introduce conflicting story lines.”
“Information confrontation”, however, is simply the literal Russian translation of the term “information warfare.” Its use by the FTIF appears to be aimed merely at justifying an FBI role in seeking to suppress what it calls “alternative news sources” under any set of circumstances it can justify.
While expressing his intention to target alternative media, Porter simultaneously denied that the FBI was concerned about censoring media. The FITF, he said “doesn’t go around chasing content. We don’t focus on what the actors say.” Instead, he insisted that “attribution is key,” suggesting that the FTIF was only interested in finding hidden foreign government actors at work.
Thus the question of “attribution” has become the FBI’s key lever for censoring alternative media that publishes critical content on U.S. foreign policy, or which attacks mainstream and corporate media narratives. If an outlet can be somehow linked to a foreign adversary, removing it from online platforms is fair game for the feds.
The strange disappearance of American Herald Tribune
In 2018, Facebook deleted the Facebook page of the American Herald Tribune (AHT), a website that publishes commentary from an array of notable authors who are harshly critical of U.S. foreign policy. Gmail, which is run by Google, quickly followed suit by removing ads linked to the outlet, while the Facebook-owned Instagram scrubbed AHT’s account altogether.
Tribune editor Anthony Hall reported at the time that the removals occurred at the end of August 2018, but there was no announcement of the move by Facebook. Nor was it reported by the corporate news media until January 2020, when CNN elicited a confirmation from a Facebook spokesman that it had indeed done so in 2018. Furthermore, the FBI was advising Facebook on both Iranian and Russian sites that were banned during that same period of a few days. As Facebook’s chief security officer Alex Stamos noted on July 21, 2018, “We have proactively reported our technical findings to US law enforcement, because they have much more information than we do, and may in time be in a position to provide public attribution.”
On August 2, a few days following the removal of AHT and two weeks after hundreds of Russian and Iranian Pages had been removed by Facebook, FBI Director Christopher Wray told reporters at a White House briefing that FBI officials had “met with top social media and technology companies several times” during the year, “providing actionable intelligence to better enable them to address abuse of their platforms by foreign actors.” He remarked that FBI officials had “shared specific threat indicators and account information so they can better monitor their own platforms.”
Cybersecurity firm FireEye, which boasts that it has contracts to support “nearly every department in the United States government,” and which has been used by Department of Homeland Security as a primary source of “threat intelligence,” also influenced Facebook’s crackdown on the Tribune. CNN cited an unnamed official of FireEye stating that the company had “assessed” with “moderate confidence” that the AHT’s website was founded in Iran and was “part of a larger influence operation.”
The CNN author was evidently unaware that in U.S. intelligence parlance “moderate confidence” suggests a near-total absence of genuine conviction. As the 2011 official “consumer’s guide” to US intelligence explained, the term “moderate confidence” generally indicates that either there are still differences of view in the intelligence community on the issue or that the judgment ”is credible and plausible but not sufficiently corroborated to warrant higher level of confidence.”
CNN also quoted FireEye official Lee Foster’s claim that “indicators, both technical and behavioral” showed that American Herald Tribune was part of the larger influence operation. The CNN story linked to a study published by FireEye featuring a “map” showing how Iranian-related media were allegedly linked to one another, primarily by similarities in content. But CNN apparently hadn’t bothered to read the study, which did not once mention the American Herald Tribune.
Finally, the CNN piece cited a 2018 tweet by Daily Beast contributor Josh Russell which it said provided “further evidence supporting American Herald Tribune’s alleged links to Iran.” In fact, his tweet merely documented the AHT’s sharing of an internet hosting service with another pro-Iran site “at some point in time.” Investigators familiar with the problem know that two websites using the same hosting service, especially over a period of years, is not a reliable indicator of a coherent organizational connection.
CNN did find evidence of deception over the registration of the AHT. The outlet’s editor, Anthony Hall, continues to give the false impression that a large number of journalists and others (including this writer), are contributors, despite the fact that their articles have been republished from other sources without permission.
However, AHT has one characteristic that differentiates it from the others that have been kicked off Facebook: The American and European authors who have appeared in its pages are all real and are advancing their own authentic views. Some are sympathetic to the Islamic Republic, but others are simply angry about U.S. policies: Some are Libertarian anti-interventionists; others are supporters of the 9/11 Truth movement or other conspiracy theories.
One notable independent contributor to AHT is Philip Giraldi, an 18-year veteran of the CIA’s Clandestine Service and and an articulate critic of US wars in the Middle East and of Israeli influence on American policy and politics. From its inception in 2015, the AHT has been edited by Anthony Hall, Professor Emeritus at University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada.
In announcing yet another takedown of Iranian Pages in October 2018, Facebook’s Gleicher declared that “coordinated inauthentic behavior” occurs when “people or organizations create networks of accounts to mislead others about who they are what they’re doing.” That certainly doesn’t apply to those who provided the content for the American Herald Tribune.
Thus the takedown of the publication by Facebook, with FBI and FireEye encouragement represents a disturbing precedent for future actions against individuals who criticize US foreign policy and outlets that attack corporate media narratives.
Shelby Pierson, the CIA official appointed by then director of national intelligence in July 2019 to chair the inter-agency “Election Executive and Leadership Board,” appeared to hint at differences in the criteria employed by his agency and the FBI on foreign and alternative media.
In an interview with former acting CIA Director Michael Morrell in February, Pierson said, “[P]articularly on the [foreign] influence side of the house, when you’re talking about blended content with First Amendment-protected speech…against the backdrop of a political paradigm and you’re involving yourself in those activities, I think that makes it more complicated” (emphasis added).
Further emphasizing the uncertainty surrounding the FBI’s methods of online media suppression, she added that the position in question “doesn’t have the same unanimity that we have in the counterterrorism context.”
Gareth Porter is an independent investigative journalist who has covered national security policy since 2005 and was the recipient of Gellhorn Prize for Journalism in 2012. His most recent book is The CIA Insider’s Guide to the Iran Crisis co-authored with John Kiriakou, just published in February.


russia-insider--2020-06-10--We Must Dismantle Jewish Supremacy - Silence Is Not an Option

ON 2 June 2020 , Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield — the two notorious Jews of “ Ben & Jerry ’ s Ice Cream ” — released a formal corporate statement entitled “ We must dismantle white supremacy ” ( here ) .
This appalling , duplicitous , and hypocritical bit of anti-White propaganda expresses their “ outrage ” at the deaths of George Floyd and other Blacks , as a result of the “ toxic seeds planted on the shores of our country in Jamestown in 1619 , ” when the first ( Jewish-traded ) slaves arrived in North @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , are “ perpetuated by a culture of white supremacy.
” Floyd ’ s demise “ was the predictable consequence of a racist and prejudiced [ American ] system and culture.
” Now they urge Americans “ to take concrete steps to dismantle white supremacy in all its forms , ” calling for four specific actions : 1 ) Trump must “ disavow white supremacists and nationalist groups ” and must “ commit our nation to a formal process of healing and reconciliation ” ; 2 ) Congress must formally create an anti-discrimination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actions ; 3 ) a “ national task force ” must be created to pass laws “ ending racial violence and increasing police accountability ” ; and 4 ) the Dept of Justice must “ reinvigorate ” its Civil Rights Division .
The horror of White supremacy will only end , they conclude , when “ white America is willing to collectively acknowledge its privilege , take responsibility… and commit to creating a future steeped in justice.
” So , the moral here is that Floyd ’ s death , and the deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reason over the past 400 years , is a result of White supremacy and White racism , for which all ( White ) Americans must make amends .
The fact that many of these Blacks died at the hands of non-Whites is apparently irrelevant , as are the facts behind the unique circumstances of every individual death .
Rather than simply state that any criminal action , by anyone of any color , should be treated fairly under the law , the Ice Cream Jews use the present situation to slander and threaten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There are specific reasons why they do this .
First , it is well-known that Jews are more comfortable and more effective at controlling and manipulating diverse , multiracial , and multicultural societies , than ones which are largely homogenous — and especially which are largely White .
Jews succeed much more easily where they are one of many ethnic minorities .
In such cases , they can work hard for “ minority justice , ” all while accruing the lion ’ s share of benefit for themselves .
Second , Jews fear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because Whites are their most formidable opponents in the struggle for social control .
Thus , any actions to protect , defend , and increase the numbers of non-Whites work to their benefit .
More non-Whites mean more exploitable social crises , more interracial dating , mating , and the consequent miscegenation , more crime , and therefore more decay of the hated White civilization .
Third , as a propaganda effort , such “ calls ” warp and confuse the public mind , causing many weak-minded people — and unfortunately many weak-minded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and an anti-White stance are the morally superior positions .
Jews thereby both draw in other non-Whites to their cause and they encourage Whites to work against their own interests and against their own well-being .
And with the full force of media , government , and academia behind them , they frequently succeed .
We need only watch the evening news these days to see the result .
Apart from the duplicitous and self-serving nature of such a statement , there is a vast truth here that is covered over and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discussed .
This is the reality of the American situation , which is a condition of Jewish supremacy .
This Jewish supremacy , furthermore , is the root cause of many social ills in this country , and is the cause of uncounted suffering here and around the world .
It is this very Jewish supremacy which must be addressed , exposed , and destroyed , if we are to get to a better state of affairs in this country .
I haven ’ t the space here to provide an elaboration , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrate the extent of this problem , and to outline a solution .
First , let there be no doubt : From its beginning , the United States was a White nation .
From the start , every Founding Father , and every citizen , were White .
Some 1 million Blacks lived here , but they were of course slaves with no civil standing .
And the few thousand Jews — most of whom were petty shopkeepers , bankers , or slave-traders — exercised little direct influence .
There were no “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of .
Under such conditions , America flourished .
Our nation began to unravel in the mid-1800s , first with giving civil rights and then citizenship to all Blacks — and indeed , to anyone born on US soil .
This “ birthright citizenship ” of the 14th Amendment ( 1868 ) was a catastrophic development in our history , and we have been paying the price ever since .
Suddenly , some 6 million Blacks , representing around 18 % of the nation , became citizens .
It was a burden , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other substantial minorities , America could still progress .
Things further decayed from the late 1800s onward , as the Jewish population boomed : from 250,000 in 1880 to 1.5 million in 1900 .
By 1910 , Jews were able to exert considerable influence on Congress — witness the 1911 abrogation of the US-Russia Trade Treaty , which served only to promote Jewish interests .
From that point on , Jewish “ supremacy ” in American society accelerated .
Jews had a prominent hand in US involvement in both World Warsi — drawing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compelling interest in the conflicts .
Jews — led by New York congressman Emanuel Celler — pushed the Johnson administration to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , which was another milestone in American decay .
At the same time , they drove American involvement in the Vietnam War , ensuring that many White Americans would die .
After the 1967 War in the Middle East , the American Jewish Lobby assumed a dominant role in society and government that it has never relinquished .
When naïve Whites or other non-Jews are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supremacism , their first instinct is to deny it .
They will deny that Jews “ run the media ” or “ control the government.
” And yet , a few facts easily dispel those mistaken notions .
Take the media .
There are currently five major media conglomerates , and each one is owned or run by Jews : ABC/Disney ( Alan Horn , Ben Sherwood , Alan Braverman , Lowell Singer , Alan Bergman ) , Warner/CNN ( John Stankey , David Levy , Jeff Zucker , Doug Shapiro , Ann @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Bonnie Hammer , Noah Oppenheim , Ron Meyer ) , 21st Century Fox ( Murdoch family ) , and CBS/Viacom ( Shari Redstone , David Nevins , Susan Zirinsky , David Stapf ) .
American entertainment and American news programming are unquestionably Jewish-oriented , and serve Jewish interests .
Or consider politics .
The Jewish Lobby , AIPAC , is the dominant lobby in Washington , rivalling even the NRA and the AARP .
Jewish donors give between 25 % ( Republicans ) and 60 % ( Democrats ) of all political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy of their choosing .
For his part , President Trump is badly entangled with Jews , both through his son-in-law Jared Kushner , and through his many Jewish allies.ii And we must remind ourselves that of nine Supreme Court justices , three ( 33 % ) are Jews — Ginsburg , Kagan , and Breyer .
Other areas of society are likewise dominated , such as high tech .
Jews run Facebook ( Zuckerberg and Sandberg ) , Google ( Page and Brin ) , Oracle ( Ellison and Catz ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And they play a critical role in the vast system of technological surveillance.iii Once we have established the facts of Jewish supremacy , the next typical response is : “ So what ?
” The reply to this is simple : Americans are virtual slaves to Jewish interests , and are allowing themselves to be brainwashed , degraded , and deceived in the process .
Literally trillions of dollars are being diverted to Jews and their institutions , primarily from the pockets of hard-working Whites .
And primarily White soldiers are fighting and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in order to make the world safe for Israel and Jews globally .
The costs to society could scarcely be higher .
Jewish supremacy must end , now .
Here , then , is my declaration : Silence Is Not an Option The present chaos among American cities , and throughout American society at large , is neither surprising nor unexpected .
In fact , it was absolutely predictable and inevitable .
In the history of humanity , there has never been a stable and successful multiracial , multicultural nation .
In fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of social decay , decline , and collapse .
This was true for ancient Babylon , it was true for the Roman Empire , it was true for Austria-Hungary , it was true for the Soviet Union .
And it will be true for America .
Disease , economic upheaval , political corruption , social unrest , crime , moral decay — all these are inevitable in the present-day United States .
The current fuss over George Floyd is a smokescreen .
Floyd was a petty criminal caught passing fake $ 20 bills @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stoned , and was likely driving that way .
Through an unfortunate series of events , he ended up dead , but there are far worse tragedies happening in this nation on a daily basis .
And top of the list is Jewish supremacy — that unspoken scourge upon civilized humanity .
Virtually every major social , political , and economic problem faced by this nation is driven , at root , by Jewish supremacy — by the policies and dictates of wealthy and influential American Jews in government , media , commerce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control every major American media corporation .
They give 25 % to 50 % of all political donation funds , and hence are able to buy politicians ; the Jewish Lobby , headed by AIPAC , dictates much of federal legislation , and has the power to destroy any politician who fails to bow down .
And their wealth is astonishing ; Jews constitute over half of the richest 50 Americans , and between a third and a half of the top 500 .
The 6 million American Jews own or control , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The facts of Jewish supremacy can not be denied .
As such , Jews must assume primary responsibility for the many failings of American society — the economic exploitation of workers , the rampant drug abuse and addiction , the moral corruption of TV and cinema , the wanton manipulation and distortion of news media , the trillions of dollars spent on foreign wars for Jewish and Israeli benefit , and the large and growing presence of non-Whites in our nation .
Such things are the poisonous fruit of the toxic seeds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shores over 400 years ago .
We — White Americans — must tackle these many problems , but we also must embark upon the more complicated work of delivering justice to all those harmed by Jewish supremacy in America , especially in the past 100 years .
Today , there is an urgent need to take concrete steps to dismantle Jewish supremacy in all its forms .
To this end , I call for six actions : First , educate : There is vast public ignorance on Jewish supremacy .
Likewise , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Jewish malfeasance and misanthropy , of Jewish contempt and hatred for all non-Jews.iv The facts are undeniable ; they need to be widely disseminated .
Second , identify : Prominent Jews often escape public notice because they are not obvious , and they are not outed .
Religious ( orthodox ) Jews are relatively easy to spot , but the many secular Jews are not .
Jews in media , government , business , and academia need to be called out ; as the Black apologists like to exclaim , we must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , those with Jewish spouses or children must be named and outed .
It is intolerable that they circulate largely unnoticed .
Third , isolate : We need to sanction and boycott all Jewish-dominated institutions .
We must stop patronizing their corporations , their media , their technology , their universities .
This action is consistent with the Boycott , Divestment , and Sanction ( BDS ) policy against Israel ; similar actions need to be taken against all Jewish-owned or -controlled entities .
Simultaneously , we need to create and support local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , quota : Jewish overrepresentation in all fields must be circumscribed by specific quotas .
At least initially , we must limit Jewish representation to their proportion of the US population ; currently , the figure is around two percent .
Thus , Jews must immediately be restricted to 2 % of Congressmen , 2 % of tech executives , 2 % of Hollywood producers and directors , 2 % of university instructors .
And , most vitally , Jews must be restricted to just 2 % of the total private wealth in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ massive confiscation and redistribution of Jewish wealth — much of it ill-gotten in the first place .
This is only fair , and any claims to the contrary can only be deemed ‘ racist.
’ Fifth , penalize : American Jews must pay , literally , for their many crimes against humanity .
As noted above , asset confiscation is a start .
If American Jews own or control $ 50 trillion , but their ‘ fair share ’ is , say , $ 2 trillion , then we need immediate confiscation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Additionally , we need to reestablish the ancient idea of a “ Jew tax , ” something implemented by the Romans after the Jewish rebellion in Jerusalem in the year 70 .
Jewish income must be subject to a considerable tax — perhaps a flat rate of 50 % on all incomes — in order to restrict their ability to regain wealth .
Sixth , evacuate : The ultimate goal , as many prominent thinkers have realized over the centuries , is to rid the nation of its Jews .
The pernicious and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be solved in no other way .
History has proven that wherever Jews accumulate in more than a fraction of a percent of a populace , they begin to exert a corrupting influence .
They can not be restrained , they can not be civilized , they can not be taught .
This is a sad but eternal fact of the Jewish people .
Therefore , any nation that hopes to prosper and thrive must banish them .
Voluntarily or forcefully , slowly or quickly — out they must go .
Away to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Once Jewish supremacy and Jewish power have been destroyed in America , other problems — with Blacks , with Hispanics , with Asians — can begin to be addressed .
Here too , we will need a process of education , of isolation , of penalty , and ultimately of repatriation .
Multiracial America will cease being multiracial , or else it will cease to exist .
Unless and until White America is willing to collectively acknowledge its responsibility for its own well-being , and to acknowledge the fundamental role of Jewish supremacy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , our problems will never end .
We must use this moment to turn the tide against the Jews , to reclaim our country , and to secure , for the first time in many decades , a vastly brighter future .
Thomas Dalton , PhD , is the author or editor of many books and articles pertaining to White interests , National Socialism , anti-Judaism , and Holocaust revisionism .
Among these are his popular work Debating the Holocaust , and his new translation of Mein Kampf .
For more details , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the Cosmotheist book store , and also see his personal Web site www.thomasdaltonphd.com .
i .
See my book “ The Jewish Hand in the World Wars ” ( 2019 ) .
iii .
See , for example , Whitney Webb ’ s article “ How the CIA , Mossad , and ‘ the Epstein Network ’ are Exploiting Mass Shootings ” ( here ) .
v. We can only imagine the economic benefits that such a windfall would bring .

ON 2 June 2020, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield — the two notorious Jews of “Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream” — released a formal corporate statement entitled “We must dismantle white supremacy” (here). This appalling, duplicitous, and hypocritical bit of anti-White propaganda expresses their “outrage” at the deaths of George Floyd and other Blacks, as a result of the “toxic seeds planted on the shores of our country in Jamestown in 1619,” when the first (Jewish-traded) slaves arrived in North America. Such deaths, they claim, are “perpetuated by a culture of white supremacy.” Floyd’s demise “was the predictable consequence of a racist and prejudiced [American] system and culture.”
Now they urge Americans “to take concrete steps to dismantle white supremacy in all its forms,” calling for four specific actions: 1) Trump must “disavow white supremacists and nationalist groups” and must “commit our nation to a formal process of healing and reconciliation”; 2) Congress must formally create an anti-discrimination commission to study the situation and recommend actions; 3) a “national task force” must be created to pass laws “ending racial violence and increasing police accountability”; and 4) the Dept of Justice must “reinvigorate” its Civil Rights Division.
The horror of White supremacy will only end, they conclude, when “white America is willing to collectively acknowledge its privilege, take responsibility… and commit to creating a future steeped in justice.” So, the moral here is that Floyd’s death, and the deaths of virtually any Black for virtually any reason over the past 400 years, is a result of White supremacy and White racism, for which all (White) Americans must make amends. The fact that many of these Blacks died at the hands of non-Whites is apparently irrelevant, as are the facts behind the unique circumstances of every individual death. Rather than simply state that any criminal action, by anyone of any color, should be treated fairly under the law, the Ice Cream Jews use the present situation to slander and threaten the entire race of White Americans.
There are specific reasons why they do this. First, it is well-known that Jews are more comfortable and more effective at controlling and manipulating diverse, multiracial, and multicultural societies, than ones which are largely homogenous — and especially which are largely White. Jews succeed much more easily where they are one of many ethnic minorities. In such cases, they can work hard for “minority justice,” all while accruing the lion’s share of benefit for themselves. Second, Jews fear White societies more than any other — because Whites are their most formidable opponents in the struggle for social control. Thus, any actions to protect, defend, and increase the numbers of non-Whites work to their benefit. More non-Whites mean more exploitable social crises, more interracial dating, mating, and the consequent miscegenation, more crime, and therefore more decay of the hated White civilization. Third, as a propaganda effort, such “calls” warp and confuse the public mind, causing many weak-minded people — and unfortunately many weak-minded Whites — to assume that “anti-racism” and an anti-White stance are the morally superior positions. Jews thereby both draw in other non-Whites to their cause and they encourage Whites to work against their own interests and against their own well-being. And with the full force of media, government, and academia behind them, they frequently succeed. We need only watch the evening news these days to see the result.
Apart from the duplicitous and self-serving nature of such a statement, there is a vast truth here that is covered over and safely stashed away, never to be discussed. This is the reality of the American situation, which is a condition of Jewish supremacy. This Jewish supremacy, furthermore, is the root cause of many social ills in this country, and is the cause of uncounted suffering here and around the world. It is this very Jewish supremacy which must be addressed, exposed, and destroyed, if we are to get to a better state of affairs in this country.
I haven’t the space here to provide an elaboration, but a few words are necessary to demonstrate the extent of this problem, and to outline a solution. First, let there be no doubt: From its beginning, the United States was a White nation. From the start, every Founding Father, and every citizen, were White. Some 1 million Blacks lived here, but they were of course slaves with no civil standing. And the few thousand Jews — most of whom were petty shopkeepers, bankers, or slave-traders — exercised little direct influence. There were no “Hispanics” and no Asians to speak of. Under such conditions, America flourished.
Our nation began to unravel in the mid-1800s, first with giving civil rights and then citizenship to all Blacks — and indeed, to anyone born on US soil. This “birthright citizenship” of the 14th Amendment (1868) was a catastrophic development in our history, and we have been paying the price ever since. Suddenly, some 6 million Blacks, representing around 18% of the nation, became citizens. It was a burden, to be sure, but with no other substantial minorities, America could still progress.
Things further decayed from the late 1800s onward, as the Jewish population boomed: from 250,000 in 1880 to 1.5 million in 1900. By 1910, Jews were able to exert considerable influence on Congress — witness the 1911 abrogation of the US-Russia Trade Treaty, which served only to promote Jewish interests. From that point on, Jewish “supremacy” in American society accelerated. Jews had a prominent hand in US involvement in both World Warsi — drawing in our nation when we had no compelling interest in the conflicts. Jews — led by New York congressman Emanuel Celler — pushed the Johnson administration to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was another milestone in American decay. At the same time, they drove American involvement in the Vietnam War, ensuring that many White Americans would die. After the 1967 War in the Middle East, the American Jewish Lobby assumed a dominant role in society and government that it has never relinquished.
When naïve Whites or other non-Jews are first confronted with the concept of Jewish supremacism, their first instinct is to deny it. They will deny that Jews “run the media” or “control the government.” And yet, a few facts easily dispel those mistaken notions. Take the media. There are currently five major media conglomerates, and each one is owned or run by Jews: ABC/Disney (Alan Horn, Ben Sherwood, Alan Braverman, Lowell Singer, Alan Bergman), Warner/CNN(John Stankey, David Levy, Jeff Zucker, Doug Shapiro, Ann Sarnoff), NBC/Universal (Robert Greenblatt, Bonnie Hammer, Noah Oppenheim, Ron Meyer), 21st Century Fox (Murdoch family), and CBS/Viacom (Shari Redstone, David Nevins, Susan Zirinsky, David Stapf). American entertainment and American news programming are unquestionably Jewish-oriented, and serve Jewish interests.
Or consider politics. The Jewish Lobby, AIPAC, is the dominant lobby in Washington, rivalling even the NRA and the AARP. Jewish donors give between 25% (Republicans) and 60% (Democrats) of all political funds, and thus can virtually dictate policy of their choosing. For his part, President Trump is badly entangled with Jews, both through his son-in-law Jared Kushner, and through his many Jewish allies.ii And we must remind ourselves that of nine Supreme Court justices, three (33%) are Jews — Ginsburg, Kagan, and Breyer.
Other areas of society are likewise dominated, such as high tech. Jews run Facebook (Zuckerberg and Sandberg), Google (Page and Brin), Oracle (Ellison and Catz), and Dell Computer (Dell). And they play a critical role in the vast system of technological surveillance.iii
Once we have established the facts of Jewish supremacy, the next typical response is: “So what?” The reply to this is simple: Americans are virtual slaves to Jewish interests, and are allowing themselves to be brainwashed, degraded, and deceived in the process. Literally trillions of dollars are being diverted to Jews and their institutions, primarily from the pockets of hard-working Whites. And primarily White soldiers are fighting and dying in the American military, simply in order to make the world safe for Israel and Jews globally. The costs to society could scarcely be higher. Jewish supremacy must end, now.
Here, then, is my declaration:
WE MUST DISMANTLE JEWISH SUPREMACY
Silence Is Not an Option
The present chaos among American cities, and throughout American society at large, is neither surprising nor unexpected. In fact, it was absolutely predictable and inevitable. In the history of humanity, there has never been a stable and successful multiracial, multicultural nation. In fact, such things were always the precursors of social decay, decline, and collapse. This was true for ancient Babylon, it was true for the Roman Empire, it was true for Austria-Hungary, it was true for the Soviet Union. And it will be true for America. Disease, economic upheaval, political corruption, social unrest, crime, moral decay — all these are inevitable in the present-day United States.
The current fuss over George Floyd is a smokescreen. Floyd was a petty criminal caught passing fake $20 bills; he was also apparently drunk or stoned, and was likely driving that way. Through an unfortunate series of events, he ended up dead, but there are far worse tragedies happening in this nation on a daily basis. And top of the list is Jewish supremacy — that unspoken scourge upon civilized humanity.
Virtually every major social, political, and economic problem faced by this nation is driven, at root, by Jewish supremacy — by the policies and dictates of wealthy and influential American Jews in government, media, commerce, and academia. Jews dominate or control every major American media corporation. They give 25% to 50% of all political donation funds, and hence are able to buy politicians; the Jewish Lobby, headed by AIPAC, dictates much of federal legislation, and has the power to destroy any politician who fails to bow down. And their wealth is astonishing; Jews constitute over half of the richest 50 Americans, and between a third and a half of the top 500. The 6 million American Jews own or control, in total, around $50 trillion. The facts of Jewish supremacy cannot be denied.
As such, Jews must assume primary responsibility for the many failings of American society — the economic exploitation of workers, the rampant drug abuse and addiction, the moral corruption of TV and cinema, the wanton manipulation and distortion of news media, the trillions of dollars spent on foreign wars for Jewish and Israeli benefit, and the large and growing presence of non-Whites in our nation. Such things are the poisonous fruit of the toxic seeds of Judaism that were planted on our shores over 400 years ago. We — White Americans — must tackle these many problems, but we also must embark upon the more complicated work of delivering justice to all those harmed by Jewish supremacy in America, especially in the past 100 years. Today, there is an urgent need to take concrete steps to dismantle Jewish supremacy in all its forms. To this end, I call for six actions:
First, educate: There is vast public ignorance on Jewish supremacy. Likewise, there is vast ignorance on the thousand-year history of Jewish malfeasance and misanthropy, of Jewish contempt and hatred for all non-Jews.iv The facts are undeniable; they need to be widely disseminated.
Second, identify: Prominent Jews often escape public notice because they are not obvious, and they are not outed. Religious (orthodox) Jews are relatively easy to spot, but the many secular Jews are not. Jews in media, government, business, and academia need to be called out; as the Black apologists like to exclaim, we must say their names. Jews, half-Jews, those with Jewish spouses or children must be named and outed. It is intolerable that they circulate largely unnoticed.
Third, isolate: We need to sanction and boycott all Jewish-dominated institutions. We must stop patronizing their corporations, their media, their technology, their universities. This action is consistent with the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction (BDS) policy against Israel; similar actions need to be taken against all Jewish-owned or -controlled entities. Simultaneously, we need to create and support local, White-owned and operated organizations.
Fourth, quota: Jewish overrepresentation in all fields must be circumscribed by specific quotas. At least initially, we must limit Jewish representation to their proportion of the US population; currently, the figure is around two percent. Thus, Jews must immediately be restricted to 2% of Congressmen, 2% of tech executives, 2% of Hollywood producers and directors, 2% of university instructors. And, most vitally, Jews must be restricted to just 2% of the total private wealth in the US; this will entail a massive confiscation and redistribution of Jewish wealth — much of it ill-gotten in the first place. This is only fair, and any claims to the contrary can only be deemed ‘racist.’
Fifth, penalize: American Jews must pay, literally, for their many crimes against humanity. As noted above, asset confiscation is a start. If American Jews own or control $50 trillion, but their ‘fair share’ is, say, $2 trillion, then we need immediate confiscation of some $48 trillion in Jewish assets.v Additionally, we need to reestablish the ancient idea of a “Jew tax,” something implemented by the Romans after the Jewish rebellion in Jerusalem in the year 70. Jewish income must be subject to a considerable tax — perhaps a flat rate of 50% on all incomes — in order to restrict their ability to regain wealth.
Sixth, evacuate: The ultimate goal, as many prominent thinkers have realized over the centuries, is to rid the nation of its Jews. The pernicious and endemic character of Jewish corruption can truly be solved in no other way. History has proven that wherever Jews accumulate in more than a fraction of a percent of a populace, they begin to exert a corrupting influence. They cannot be restrained, they cannot be civilized, they cannot be taught. This is a sad but eternal fact of the Jewish people. Therefore, any nation that hopes to prosper and thrive must banish them. Voluntarily or forcefully, slowly or quickly — out they must go. Away to Israel, to their native homeland.
Once Jewish supremacy and Jewish power have been destroyed in America, other problems — with Blacks, with Hispanics, with Asians — can begin to be addressed. Here too, we will need a process of education, of isolation, of penalty, and ultimately of repatriation. Multiracial America will cease being multiracial, or else it will cease to exist.
Unless and until White America is willing to collectively acknowledge its responsibility for its own well-being, and to acknowledge the fundamental role of Jewish supremacy in the many crises of our nation, our problems will never end. We must use this moment to turn the tide against the Jews, to reclaim our country, and to secure, for the first time in many decades, a vastly brighter future.
* * *
Thomas Dalton, PhD, is the author or editor of many books and articles pertaining to White interests, National Socialism, anti-Judaism, and Holocaust revisionism. Among these are his popular work Debating the Holocaust, and his new translation of Mein Kampf. For more details, see the listing of his books available at the Cosmotheist book store, and also see his personal Web site www.thomasdaltonphd.com.
Notes
i. See my book “The Jewish Hand in the World Wars” (2019).
ii. Including Lew Eisenberg, Sheldon Adelson, Mel Sembler, Ron Weiser, Steve Wynn, Elliot Broidy, Laurie Perlmutter, Gail Icahn, Avi Berkowitz, Michael Cohen, Gary Cohn, Reed Cordish, Boris Epshteyn, David Friedman, Jason Greenblatt, Larry Kudlow, Stephen Miller, Steven Mnuchin, David Shulkin, and Allen Weisselberg
iii. See, for example, Whitney Webb’s article “How the CIA, Mossad, and ‘the Epstein Network’ are Exploiting Mass Shootings” (here).
iv. See my book “Eternal Strangers” (2020).
v. We can only imagine the economic benefits that such a windfall would bring.