russia-insider--2020-06-16--FAKE Anti-Globalist: Trump Isn't Bringing Troops Home from Germany, He's Moving them to Poland to Go

FAKE Anti-Globalist: Trump Isn't Bringing Troops Home from Germany, He's Moving them to Poland to Goad Russia

This is right in line with the wall with Mexico he never intended to build , the anti- immigrant legistlation he never intended to pass , the Middle East wars he never intended to end .
Trump talked a good game to get himself elected , but he is owned by big Jewish money , and that explains everything .
According to American media , U.S. President Donald Trump plans to withdraw 9,500 American soldiers from Germany .
U.S. troop numbers in Germany will be reduced to about 25,000 at a time when Warsaw insists on the strengthening of American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for 35,000 foreign soldiers and 17,000 civilian workers , along with their families , to be in the European country .
Between 2012 and 2019 , Berlin allocated €480 million to all expenses related to hosting NATO soldiers in Germany .
This was almost exclusively for the Americans .
For 2019-2030 , another €650 million was allocated .
The claim that Germany is receiving American defense for free is completely untrue .
Even the withdrawal of nearly 10,000 American soldiers from Germany will not change anything significantly for the European country .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. presence in Germany is the Ramstein base .
The U.S. will never leave Ramstein as it is effectively an American enclave on German soil and is the center of military logistics and an important point to observe Eastern Europe .
In the end , the deployment of American troops is only part of the U.S. ’ long-term plans for Europe , which was once well explained by a Polish-American political scientist and political adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski .
Namely , the U.S. wants to control France , Germany , Poland and Ukraine as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presidency of Charles de Gaulle ( 1959-1969 ) , Washington has never been able to fully control Paris , especially since there are no U.S. military bases in France .
Germany however operated according to the American model and is one of its most loyal allies to progress U.S. interests in Europe .
Poland under conservative rule is strengthening its historical hostilities towards Russia , and to a lesser extent against Germany , too .
This makes Poland an ideal partner for the U.S. in Europe , and today , probably even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ukraine is always proving to be a willing agent of Washington against Russia .
Some German politicians in response to the withdrawal of some American soldiers are leading mass hysteria .
They want to win or buy Washington ’ s favor .
This is despite the fact that Germany from an economic perspective will benefit from the partial American withdrawal ; while on the other hand , Germany does not have its so-called security concerns weakened since the American soldiers will be placed just a few hundred kilometers away in Poland , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Kaliningrad .
From the point of view of security policy , Germany nevertheless remains dependent on the U.S. military and political establishment and can be caught up in American aggressions that it does not need to be involved in .
European emancipation in the field of security policy is only being pushed by the French and the status quo of American dominance is ardently defended by many other European countries , especially Poland .
Russia has already expressed its concerns that the potential relocation of American soldiers is directed against its country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foreign Affairs Maria Zakharova said “ as for the White House initiative mentioned earlier , it is also worrying because immediately there was a proposal to move American soldiers still stationed in Germany to neighboring Poland .
I would like to emphasize that the reconfiguration of the U.S. presence towards Russian borders will not only deepen the already high tension in the sphere of security on the continent , but will further complicate the prospects for the development of constructive dialogue between Russia and NATO in the military and political sphere.
” However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relocation of these American soldiers .
The Atlantic Council of Bulgaria is urging for the Balkan country ’ s government to not pass up the opportunity and advocates that they should ask the U.S. to relocate American soldiers from Germany to Bulgaria .
In a Facebook post , the Atlantic Council of Bulgaria argues that “ The urgent need to strengthen NATO 's southeastern flank , in the context of the violated balance of powers in the Black Sea in favor of the Russian Federation ” and “ a new generation of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Euro-Atlantic family and firmly determined to permanently interrupt Russian dependencies , which are still stumbling the development of the state , ” are reasons why the U.S. must relocate its troops to Bulgaria .
Whether these soldiers are relocated to Poland , or potentially even Bulgaria , the purpose is to strengthen countries that are willingly and wanting to oppose Russia .
Despite some German concerns that their security will be weakened , Ramstein base will remain the jewel of American military deployments in Europe .
Although some commentators believe the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. withdrawal from Europe , it is actually an escalation aimed at pressuring Russia .

This is right in line with the wall with Mexico he never intended to build, the anti- immigrant legistlation he never intended to pass, the Middle East wars he never intended to end. Trump talked a good game to get himself elected, but he is owned by big Jewish money, and that explains everything.
According to American media, U.S. President Donald Trump plans to withdraw 9,500 American soldiers from Germany. U.S. troop numbers in Germany will be reduced to about 25,000 at a time when Warsaw insists on the strengthening of American military presence in Poland.
Germany pays for 35,000 foreign soldiers and 17,000 civilian workers, along with their families, to be in the European country. Between 2012 and 2019, Berlin allocated €480 million to all expenses related to hosting NATO soldiers in Germany. This was almost exclusively for the Americans. For 2019-2030, another €650 million was allocated. The claim that Germany is receiving American defense for free is completely untrue.
Even the withdrawal of nearly 10,000 American soldiers from Germany will not change anything significantly for the European country. This is because the main heart of the U.S. presence in Germany is the Ramstein base. The U.S. will never leave Ramstein as it is effectively an American enclave on German soil and is the center of military logistics and an important point to observe Eastern Europe.
In the end, the deployment of American troops is only part of the U.S.’ long-term plans for Europe, which was once well explained by a Polish-American political scientist and political adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski. Namely, the U.S. wants to control France, Germany, Poland and Ukraine as they can collectively oppose Russia. Since the presidency of Charles de Gaulle (1959-1969), Washington has never been able to fully control Paris, especially since there are no U.S. military bases in France. Germany however operated according to the American model and is one of its most loyal allies to progress U.S. interests in Europe. Poland under conservative rule is strengthening its historical hostilities towards Russia, and to a lesser extent against Germany, too. This makes Poland an ideal partner for the U.S. in Europe, and today, probably even more so then Germany. Meanwhile, Ukraine is always proving to be a willing agent of Washington against Russia.
Some German politicians in response to the withdrawal of some American soldiers are leading mass hysteria. They want to win or buy Washington’s favor. This is despite the fact that Germany from an economic perspective will benefit from the partial American withdrawal; while on the other hand, Germany does not have its so-called security concerns weakened since the American soldiers will be placed just a few hundred kilometers away in Poland, which of course is to put further pressure against Kaliningrad.
From the point of view of security policy, Germany nevertheless remains dependent on the U.S. military and political establishment and can be caught up in American aggressions that it does not need to be involved in. European emancipation in the field of security policy is only being pushed by the French and the status quo of American dominance is ardently defended by many other European countries, especially Poland.
Russia has already expressed its concerns that the potential relocation of American soldiers is directed against its country. Spokeswoman for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Maria Zakharova said “as for the White House initiative mentioned earlier, it is also worrying because immediately there was a proposal to move American soldiers still stationed in Germany to neighboring Poland. I would like to emphasize that the reconfiguration of the U.S. presence towards Russian borders will not only deepen the already high tension in the sphere of security on the continent, but will further complicate the prospects for the development of constructive dialogue between Russia and NATO in the military and political sphere.”
However, Poland is facing competition for the relocation of these American soldiers. The Atlantic Council of Bulgaria is urging for the Balkan country’s government to not pass up the opportunity and advocates that they should ask the U.S. to relocate American soldiers from Germany to Bulgaria.
In a Facebook post, the Atlantic Council of Bulgaria argues that “The urgent need to strengthen NATO's southeastern flank, in the context of the violated balance of powers in the Black Sea in favor of the Russian Federation” and “a new generation of people who are permanently oriented towards the values of the Euro-Atlantic family and firmly determined to permanently interrupt Russian dependencies, which are still stumbling the development of the state,” are reasons why the U.S. must relocate its troops to Bulgaria.
Whether these soldiers are relocated to Poland, or potentially even Bulgaria, the purpose is to strengthen countries that are willingly and wanting to oppose Russia. Despite some German concerns that their security will be weakened, Ramstein base will remain the jewel of American military deployments in Europe. Although some commentators believe the American soldiers leaving Germany was a partial U.S. withdrawal from Europe, it is actually an escalation aimed at pressuring Russia.


russia-insider--2020-06-16--Putin Says Russia Will Soon Be Able to Counter 'Invincible' Hypersonic Weapons

The thing about hypersonic missiles is they are supposed to be impossible to defend against .
Since Russia began touting its experimental arsenal two years ago , the prospect of devastating weapons capable of traveling at Mach 5 , or at least a mile per second , has kept Pentagon generals up at night .
“ The hypersonic threat is real , it is not imagination , ” Air Force Lt. Gen. Samuel Greaves told a D.C. defense conference in 2018 .
“ Greaves comments come amid reports that assess Russia will be capable of fielding a hypersonic glide vehicle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defend against , by 2020 , ” a report at the time underscored alarmingly .
The `` indefensible '' super weapon ... but Russian President Vladimir Putin now says the Kremlin will soon have the technology to defend against it — this as more and more information has been slowly revealed concerning the US Department of Defense 's own multi-billion dollar hypersonics program .
Russian state media further said Putin referenced an emerging hypersonins 'arms race ' .
The Russian president said that Russia 's rivals will soon be `` surprised '' when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be able to `` combat them '' .
Putin 's words , as conveyed by RT , were paraphrased as follows : Other nations are hastily designing their own hypersonic weapons – but by the time they are acquired , the Russian military will have learned how to shield the country from them , President Vladimir Putin said .
The world ’ s leading military powers will eventually succeed in developing the ultra-fast weapons , President Vladimir Putin told Russia-1 TV .
Russia , meanwhile , which seems to be leading the race @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be caught off-guard once that happens , he pledged .
I think that we can pleasantly surprise our partners with the fact that when they get these weapons , we will have the means of combating them , with a high degree of probability .
Prior US intelligence reports predicted that Russia could possess battle-ready hypersonic weapons by mid-2020 ; however , at this point it seems unlikely given recent apparent major setbacks in Russia 's testing hypersonics .
Those prior reports also described `` a Russian weapon the U.S. is currently unable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previously undergone reported successful tests , namely the hypersonic glide missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead , dubbed Avangard .
Putin had previously called the Avangard `` invincible '' .
But assuming Putin 's newest remarks on hypersonics are anywhere near accurate — that Russia is close to being able to defend against hypersonic missiles — this would be a true game-changing advantage without parallel , whether it be China or America 's experimental programs .

The thing about hypersonic missiles is they are supposed to be impossible to defend against. Since Russia began touting its experimental arsenal two years ago, the prospect of devastating weapons capable of traveling at Mach 5, or at least a mile per second, has kept Pentagon generals up at night.
“The hypersonic threat is real, it is not imagination,” Air Force Lt. Gen. Samuel Greaves told a D.C. defense conference in 2018. “Greaves comments come amid reports that assess Russia will be capable of fielding a hypersonic glide vehicle, a weapon that no country can defend against, by 2020,” a report at the time underscored alarmingly.
The "indefensible" super weapon... but Russian President Vladimir Putin now says the Kremlin will soon have the technology to defend against it — this as more and more information has been slowly revealed concerning the US Department of Defense's own multi-billion dollar hypersonics program.
Putin made the new comments Sunday:
“It’s very likely that we will have means to combat hypersonic weapons by the time the world’s leading countries have such weapons,” he said according to the RIA news agency.
Russian state media further said Putin referenced an emerging hypersonins 'arms race'.
The Russian president said that Russia's rivals will soon be "surprised" when they learn the Russian armed forces will be able to "combat them". Putin's words, as conveyed by RT, were paraphrased as follows:
Other nations are hastily designing their own hypersonic weapons – but by the time they are acquired, the Russian military will have learned how to shield the country from them, President Vladimir Putin said. The world’s leading military powers will eventually succeed in developing the ultra-fast weapons, President Vladimir Putin told Russia-1 TV. Russia, meanwhile, which seems to be leading the race for hypersonic dominance, won’t be caught off-guard once that happens, he pledged. I think that we can pleasantly surprise our partners with the fact that when they get these weapons, we will have the means of combating them, with a high degree of probability.
Prior US intelligence reports predicted that Russia could possess battle-ready hypersonic weapons by mid-2020; however, at this point it seems unlikely given recent apparent major setbacks in Russia's testing hypersonics.
Those prior reports also described "a Russian weapon the U.S. is currently unable to defend against..." which has previously undergone reported successful tests, namely the hypersonic glide missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, dubbed Avangard. Putin had previously called the Avangard "invincible".
But assuming Putin's newest remarks on hypersonics are anywhere near accurate — that Russia is close to being able to defend against hypersonic missiles — this would be a true game-changing advantage without parallel, whether it be China or America's experimental programs.


russia-insider--2020-06-17--US Will Send Ukraine Another $250M in Weapons, Gear and Other Aid

The upcoming delivery will bring total counter-Russia aid to the Eastern European nation to $ 1.75 billion .
The Pentagon will send weapons and other military aid worth $ 250 million to Ukraine as part of the four-year-old Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative , or USAI , defense officials announced Thursday .
The aid includes counter-artillery radars , air surveillance systems , other tactical equipment , military medical treatment , cyber defenses , and “ strategic communications , ” according to a Thursday release by the Pentagon .
Intended to help Ukraine fight the Russia-backed forces that have occupied part of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2014 , the aid aims to “ enhance Ukraine ’ s defensive lethal capabilities and situational awareness in the maritime domain ” and “ counter Russian cyber offensive operations and misinformation.
” Past U.S. aid to Ukraine , which totals about $ 1.5 billion , has included : Javelin anti-tank missiles , retired Coast Guard cutters , unarmed drones , Harris radios , armored Humvees , and communications equipment .
The U.S. has also helped to train Ukrainian special forces .
The release said the new aid re-affirms the “ long-standing defense relationship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a critical partner on the front line of strategic competition with Russia .
The United States remains steadfast in its support for Ukraine ’ s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.
” Last year , misuse of the USAI funds led to the impeachment of President Donald Trump .
After the Office of Management and Budget withheld $ 214 million that Congress had appropriated through the initiative , Trump told his Ukrainian counterpart that the aid would be released only after certain key “ favors , ” including announcing an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ candidate Joe Biden .
Laura Cooper , U.S. defense undersecretary for Russia , Eurasia and Ukraine , testified that Ukraine had met various metrics for political reform and that the Defense Department supported the release of the aid .
The Government Accountability Office determined that the hold was a violation of the federal Impoundment Control Act .
• Patrick Tucker is technology editor for Defense One .
He ’ s also the author of The Naked Future : What Happens in a World That Anticipates Your Every Move ?
( Current , 2014 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ editor for The Futurist for nine years .
Tucker has written about emerging technology in Slate , ... FULL BIO

AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka
The upcoming delivery will bring total counter-Russia aid to the Eastern European nation to $1.75 billion.
The Pentagon will send weapons and other military aid worth $250 million to Ukraine as part of the four-year-old Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, or USAI, defense officials announced Thursday.
The aid includes counter-artillery radars, air surveillance systems, other tactical equipment, military medical treatment, cyber defenses, and “strategic communications,” according to a Thursday release by the Pentagon. Intended to help Ukraine fight the Russia-backed forces that have occupied part of the country’s eastern region since 2014, the aid aims to “enhance Ukraine’s defensive lethal capabilities and situational awareness in the maritime domain” and “counter Russian cyber offensive operations and misinformation.”
Past U.S. aid to Ukraine, which totals about $1.5 billion, has included: Javelin anti-tank missiles, retired Coast Guard cutters, unarmed drones, Harris radios, armored Humvees, and communications equipment. The U.S. has also helped to train Ukrainian special forces.
The release said the new aid re-affirms the “long-standing defense relationship between the United States and Ukraine – a critical partner on the front line of strategic competition with Russia. The United States remains steadfast in its support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.”
Last year, misuse of the USAI funds led to the impeachment of President Donald Trump. After the Office of Management and Budget withheld $214 million that Congress had appropriated through the initiative, Trump told his Ukrainian counterpart that the aid would be released only after certain key “favors,” including announcing an investigation into the family of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. Laura Cooper, U.S. defense undersecretary for Russia, Eurasia and Ukraine, testified that Ukraine had met various metrics for political reform and that the Defense Department supported the release of the aid. The Government Accountability Office determined that the hold was a violation of the federal Impoundment Control Act.


russia-insider--2020-06-17--Hitler Revealed How Today's Elites Castrate and Control Conservatives (Strike & Mike Podcast + Trans

Hitler Revealed How Today's Elites Castrate and Control Conservatives (Strike & Mike Podcast + Transcript)

strikeandmikecuckservative.mp3 transcript powered by Sonix—easily convert your audio to text with Sonix .
strikeandmikecuckservative.mp3 was automatically transcribed by Sonix with the latest audio-to-text algorithms .
This transcript may contain errors .
Sonix is the best audio automated transcription service in 2020 .
Our automated transcription algorithms works with many of the popular audio file formats .
What I was talking to you about the other day , Mike , urban whites , urban ethnic whites and rural whites need to get together and ignore the sensibilities of bourgeois upper middle class suburban whites .
OK. Because that is a Republican @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It 's not working .
OK. Urban whites have a very different experience and rural whites have a very different experience .
And frankly , they have more testosterone .
They have more testosterone .
They have stronger communities .
If you live in a suburb , you probably atomized .
You do n't have you do n't know who lives on your own street .
You do n't even know your name .
Everyone else in the homeo , you know who each other was trying to appeal to win over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He does not want to fight .
They do not want to fight .
I believe Hitler says that in Mein Kampf as well .
Oh yeah .
He says that bourgeois parties have absolutely no will .
They have no will to fight .
You need to get your audience there in some urban white little pockets of Philly , in Queens and fuck it all over the country .
Go to those pockets .
Those are the whites that you want to fight .
And they do n't give a flying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the neighbors are gon na think or whether the media calls them .
They do n't give a fuck because they understand what the stakes are .
Yeah , because I mean , it is funny reading Mein Kampf , how how much of it just supplies and just like slightly different shuffled circumstances put like the basic lessons apply .
And he talks about like the tactics of what , social social democracy .
But then he realized , of course , oh , these people are these people are Jews , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That 's that 's sort of when that realization hits some these acquires everything .
These people saying like subversive and disgusting and like tearing everything down .
They 're supposed to be fighting for workers , but all they 're doing is like tearing down everything decent .
And that 's what a leftist I know who 's reading Mein Kampf right now I 'm really impressed by was telling me this person was telling me that they were impressed because they were saying , like , you know , Hitler talks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instincts and use it for a subversive cause , like an anti soap .
Not subversive necessarily , but like a a more accurate word would be anti-social .
They they they use people 's goodwill , good instincts for really destructive shit that hurts the very people .
They also would be surprised to learn from reading it that Hitler has a great deal of sympathy .
Now , he 's not he does n't hide how sort of degraded certain elements of the working the laboring class in Vienna are .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ degenerate they 've become .
But he says , you know , these are there .
Again , it 's a very leftist thing , he says a product of their conditions .
And he 's like , we have to improve their conditions .
But , you know , the current easily the bourgeoisie party .
And he blames the bourgeoisie parties , which but we can understand that as conservatives , we democratically , mostly conservatives .
Yeah , right .
We can translate his what he calls bourgeoisie to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like they need to not ignore the social problem , because if they do it , these Jews that are pretending to care are going to destroy them .
And , of course , you know , he 's totally right .
And then , you know , it 's really funny how he also says this .
This is great .
So I 'm actually read this .
This is chapter two under the subheading Social Democratic tactics .
He says , In less than two years , I gained a clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of social democracy .
Now , that 's not social democracy as such .
That is the Jewish party leaders , Social Democratic Party and the Jewish social democratic press .
You 're not talking about like the idea of social democracy itself .
I recognize the infamous mental terrorism carried out against the bourgeoisie .
By that , you can read conservatives who are neither morally nor spiritual equipped to withstand such attacks .
The tactics of social democracy consisted in opening at a given signal , a veritable onslaught of lies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viewed as their strongest adversary until his nerves gave way .
And they sacrificed the man who was attacked simply in the hope of being allowed to live in peace .
But the fools never attained peace .
The same tactics are repeated again and again until the fear of those mad dogs paralyzes their victims .
Thus , it 's social democracy learned the value of strength , and for that reason , it attacks mostly those who are all the stronger nature , which is rare indeed .
On the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , more or less cautiously , according to the measure of his mental qualities .
They have less fear of a man of genius who lacks willpower than a vigorous character with mediocre intelligence .
So , yeah , think about that for a second .
Conservatives , drugs .
It 's your drugs .
All this has happened before .
It 's the same thing .
I mean , think about I mean , I was reading that I was like spankin the dispersals a much better translation than the one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confusing .
It can actually put you to sleep because it 's a little bit harder to follow the language .
And so you find yourself having done dumb thing all I read it two pages .
I do n't know what I read .
I just kind of , you know , that kind of thing .
But this one is engaging his guy .
Really Thomastown really translated it for a American reader of today .
It 's good .
I recommend people get it or find it online or somewhere @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And you really kind of .
You get it much better .
Also , maybe I 'm just in the mindset to read it more than when I just saw it as a task , to read it like , you know , several years ago .
But so , you know , it really is true that this is what they do .
They praise the weak and the strong people .
They viciously of a viciously attack until until until the conservatives themselves wo n't side with their own strong people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that that would be like us or other examples of some some examples that have cropped up here and there .
And then those people are like .
All right .
Well , this same word .
And then , you know , the then they say , oh , but this guy is great .
So good .
Like John McCain right now .
Yeah .
Like , that 's the kind of thing they 're talking about .
So base .
Right .
Shore .
That 's sad .
So so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bourgeois conservatives are like want I remember , you know , how people would complain and some of the boomer boomer baat .
Conservatives complain about how like rhinos .
Like rhinos .
The Republicans that want the approval of Democrats .
What they mean by that is the approval of the press .
And the press is controlled by Jews .
I mean , this is some missing oval 's and .
But they understate .
See the kind of the same phenomena happening Republicans are .
Oh , it 's not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jewish press that they 're competing for the favor of .
And so in order to do that , you have when get the approval of the Jewish press , you also have the purse strings .
Loosen up and you get more donations , you get more donors get more warm , you get a lead to being , you know , weak and not not actually stick up for anything .
We look at Ted Cruz .
I mean , I was shocked that Ted Cruz , Ted Cruz , Trey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as they were n't seen as rhinos .
Yeah .
They 're like the stronger types .
Yeah .
Those guys now sound exactly like blue haired SJW .
Automatically convert your audio files to text with Sonix .
Sonix is the best online , automated transcription service .
Sonix uses cutting-edge artificial intelligence to convert your mp3 files to text .
Sonix takes transcription to a whole new level .
Do you have a lot of background noise in your audio files ?
Here 's how you can remove background audio noise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audio content with Sonix .
Automated transcription can quickly transcribe your skype calls .
All of your remote meetings will be better indexed with a Sonix transcript .
Manual audio transcription is tedious and expensive .
Sonix converts audio to text in minutes , not hours .
Get the most out of your audio content with Sonix .
Lawyers need to transcribe their interviews , phone calls , and video recordings .
Most choose Sonix as their speech-to-text technology .
Sonix uses cutting-edge artificial intelligence to convert your mp3 files to text .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ software in 2020—it 's fast , easy , and affordable .
If you are looking for a great way to convert your audio to text , try Sonix today .

strikeandmikecuckservative.mp3 was automatically transcribed by Sonix with the latest audio-to-text algorithms. This transcript may contain errors. Sonix is the best audio automated transcription service in 2020. Our automated transcription algorithms works with many of the popular audio file formats.
What I was talking to you about the other day, Mike, urban whites, urban ethnic whites and rural whites need to get together and ignore the sensibilities of bourgeois upper middle class suburban whites. OK. Because that is a Republican coalition. And it's not working. It's not working. OK. Urban whites have a very different experience and rural whites have a very different experience. And frankly, they have more testosterone. They have more testosterone. They have stronger communities. If you live in a suburb, you probably atomized. You don't have you don't know who lives on your own street. You don't even know your name. Everyone else in the homeo, you know who each other was trying to appeal to win over the Bourgois. You get Bourgois. He does not want to fight. They do not want to fight. I believe Hitler says that in Mein Kampf as well. Oh yeah. He says that bourgeois parties have absolutely no will. They have no will to fight. You need to get your audience there in some urban white little pockets of Philly, in Queens and fuck it all over the country. Go to those pockets. Those are the whites that you want to fight. And they don't give a flying fuck about how it looks or what the neighbors are gonna think or whether the media calls them. They don't give a fuck because they understand what the stakes are.
Yeah, because I mean, it is funny reading Mein Kampf, how how much of it just supplies and just like slightly different shuffled circumstances put like the basic lessons apply. And he talks about like the tactics of what, social social democracy. But then he realized, of course, oh, these people are these people are Jews, the ones that are doing it. That's that's sort of when that realization hits some these acquires everything. These people saying like subversive and disgusting and like tearing everything down. They're supposed to be fighting for workers, but all they're doing is like tearing down everything decent.
And that's what a leftist I know who's reading Mein Kampf right now I'm really impressed by was telling me this person was telling me that they were impressed because they were saying, like, you know, Hitler talks about how they exploit people's egalitarian instincts and use it for a subversive cause, like an anti soap. Not subversive necessarily, but like a a more accurate word would be anti-social. They they they use people's goodwill, good instincts for really destructive shit that hurts the very people.
They also would be surprised to learn from reading it that Hitler has a great deal of sympathy. Now, he's not he doesn't hide how sort of degraded certain elements of the working the laboring class in Vienna are. He is open up front about how degenerate they've become. But he says, you know, these are there. Again, it's a very leftist thing, he says a product of their conditions. And he's like, we have to improve their conditions. But, you know, the current easily the bourgeoisie party. And he blames the bourgeoisie parties, which but we can understand that as conservatives, we democratically, mostly conservatives. Yeah, right. We can translate his what he calls bourgeoisie to be like the Conservative Party.
He's like they need to not ignore the social problem, because if they do it, these Jews that are pretending to care are going to destroy them. And, of course, you know, he's totally right. And then, you know, it's really funny how he also says this. This is great.
So I'm actually read this. This is chapter two under the subheading Social Democratic tactics. He says, In less than two years, I gained a clear understanding of the doctrine and operational technique of social democracy. Now, that's not social democracy as such. That is the Jewish party leaders, Social Democratic Party and the Jewish social democratic press. You're not talking about like the idea of social democracy itself. I recognize the infamous mental terrorism carried out against the bourgeoisie. By that, you can read conservatives who are neither morally nor spiritual equipped to withstand such attacks. The tactics of social democracy consisted in opening at a given signal, a veritable onslaught of lies and slanders against the man whom they viewed as their strongest adversary until his nerves gave way. And they sacrificed the man who was attacked simply in the hope of being allowed to live in peace. But the fools never attained peace. The same tactics are repeated again and again until the fear of those mad dogs paralyzes their victims. Thus, it's social democracy learned the value of strength, and for that reason, it attacks mostly those who are all the stronger nature, which is rare indeed. On the other hand, it praises every weakling among it, more or less cautiously, according to the measure of his mental qualities. They have less fear of a man of genius who lacks willpower than a vigorous character with mediocre intelligence.
So, yeah, think about that for a second. Conservatives, drugs. It's your drugs. All this has happened before.
It's the same thing. I mean, think about I mean, I was reading that I was like spankin the dispersals a much better translation than the one I read before, which is somewhat confusing. It can actually put you to sleep because it's a little bit harder to follow the language. And so you find yourself having done dumb thing all I read it two pages. I don't know what I read. I just kind of, you know, that kind of thing. But this one is engaging his guy.
Really Thomastown really translated it for a American reader of today. It's good. I recommend people get it or find it online or somewhere. That's a good translation. And you really kind of. You get it much better. Also, maybe I'm just in the mindset to read it more than when I just saw it as a task, to read it like, you know, several years ago. But so, you know, it really is true that this is what they do. They praise the weak and the strong people. They viciously of a viciously attack until until until the conservatives themselves won't side with their own strong people by people, you know, and that that would be like us or other examples of some some examples that have cropped up here and there.
And then those people are like. All right. Well, this same word.
And then, you know, the then they say, oh, but this guy is great. So good. Like John McCain right now. Yeah. Like, that's the kind of thing they're talking about. So base. Right. Shore. That's sad. So so I thought, well, these these bourgeois conservatives are like want I remember, you know, how people would complain and some of the boomer boomer baat. Conservatives complain about how like rhinos. Like rhinos. The Republicans that want the approval of Democrats. What they mean by that is the approval of the press. And the press is controlled by Jews. I mean, this is some missing oval's and. But they understate. See the kind of the same phenomena happening Republicans are. Oh, it's not liberals and Democrats. It's the Jewish press that they're competing for the favor of.
And so in order to do that, you have when get the approval of the Jewish press, you also have the purse strings.
Loosen up and you get more donations, you get more donors get more warm, you get a lead to being, you know, weak and not not actually stick up for anything.
We look at Ted Cruz. I mean, I was shocked that Ted Cruz, Ted Cruz, Trey Gowdy, your guys that were seen as they weren't seen as rhinos. Yeah. They're like the stronger types. Yeah. Those guys now sound exactly like blue haired SJW.
Sonix uses cutting-edge artificial intelligence to convert your mp3 files to text.
Sonix takes transcription to a whole new level. Do you have a lot of background noise in your audio files? Here's how you can remove background audio noise for free. Create and share better audio content with Sonix. Automated transcription can quickly transcribe your skype calls. All of your remote meetings will be better indexed with a Sonix transcript. Manual audio transcription is tedious and expensive. Sonix converts audio to text in minutes, not hours. Get the most out of your audio content with Sonix. Lawyers need to transcribe their interviews, phone calls, and video recordings. Most choose Sonix as their speech-to-text technology.
Sonix is the best online audio transcription software in 2020—it's fast, easy, and affordable.
If you are looking for a great way to convert your audio to text, try Sonix today.


russia-insider--2020-06-17--Cool Video of Russia's Newest Cutting Edge Submarine, the Supe-Quiet, Nuke Carrying 'Prince Vladimir

Cool Video of Russia's Newest Cutting Edge Submarine, the Supe-Quiet, Nuke Carrying 'Prince Vladimir'

Incidentally , these subs carrying the new generation of hypersonic missiles , make the entire US navy 's aircraft carrier fleet obsolete .
In a major conflict , they could be sunk within minutes .
The US , currently , has no defense against these weapons .
St. Andrew 's flag was hoisted on the Day of Russia on the strategic nuclear-powered submarine cruiser Prince Vladimir .
Today , he entered the combat structure of the Navy of Russia .
With 16 Bulava intercontinental missiles in the arsenal , the submarine will strengthen the nuclear shield of our country .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ project cruisers will become the basis of naval nuclear forces .
The first crew of the newest nuclear submarine , Prince Vladimir , was solemnly lined up on the deck on which the red carpet is spread .
The most exciting and solemn moment .
The commander raises the St. Andrew flag - the nuclear submarine missile cruiser K549 is included in the Russian Navy .
Russia has always been a great maritime power .
Only a few countries can afford to have a fleet and submarines .
And no country in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in speed , maneuverability , stealth and military power , the submarine cruiser will now further strengthen Russia 's nuclear shield .
At the end of the year , Prince Vladimir made a successful test launch of such a missile from an underwater position in the White Sea .
All the experience of world underwater shipbuilding was taken into account .
This is a unique ship with completely new technologies that will allow our fleet to be ahead of the rest .
Most of the characteristics of the submarine are strictly classified .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ submarine of the new advanced project `` Borey-A '' .
The submarine began to be built on Sevmash 8 years ago .
The laying ceremony was then attended by Vladimir Putin .
The submarine became the fourth in the so-called `` princely series '' .
According to tradition , such atomic submarine missile carriers are given the names of the rulers of Russia .
Currently , they are “ Vladimir Monomakh ” , “ Yuri Dolgoruky ” , “ Alexander Nevsky ” .
Now `` Prince Vladimir '' will guard the country 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and thelevel of automatisation , this is the most formidable weapon that the Navy has acquired over the past few years .
In the near future , the crew will begin to serve .
The ship became like a family to us .
The crew , myself , and submarine feel like one family .
Currently , four more submarines of this class are under construction , and in the next three years , the Russian Navy will receive more than 60 modern warships and submarines .

Incidentally, these subs carrying the new generation of hypersonic missiles, make the entire US navy's aircraft carrier fleet obsolete. In a major conflict, they could be sunk within minutes. The US, currently, has no defense against these weapons.
St. Andrew's flag was hoisted on the Day of Russia on the strategic nuclear-powered submarine cruiser Prince Vladimir.
Today, he entered the combat structure of the Navy of Russia.
With 16 Bulava intercontinental missiles in the arsenal, the submarine will strengthen the nuclear shield of our country.
And in the future, the Borey-A project cruisers will become the basis of naval nuclear forces.
Alexander Hristienko reports.
The first crew of the newest nuclear submarine, Prince Vladimir, was solemnly lined up on the deck on which the red carpet is spread.
The most exciting and solemn moment.
The commander raises the St. Andrew flag - the nuclear submarine missile cruiser K549 is included in the Russian Navy.
Russia has always been a great maritime power. Only a few countries can afford to have a fleet and submarines.
And no country in the world has such a submarine.
Unique in speed, maneuverability, stealth and military power, the submarine cruiser will now further strengthen Russia's nuclear shield.
Onboard are 16 Bulava ballistic missiles.
At the end of the year, Prince Vladimir made a successful test launch of such a missile from an underwater position in the White Sea.
All the experience of world underwater shipbuilding was taken into account.
This is a unique ship with completely new technologies that will allow our fleet to be ahead of the rest.
Most of the characteristics of the submarine are strictly classified.
"Prince Vladimir" is the lead submarine of the new advanced project "Borey-A".
The submarine began to be built on Sevmash 8 years ago.
The laying ceremony was then attended by Vladimir Putin.
The submarine became the fourth in the so-called "princely series".
According to tradition, such atomic submarine missile carriers are given the names of the rulers of Russia.
Currently, they are “Vladimir Monomakh”, “Yuri Dolgoruky”, “Alexander Nevsky”.
Now "Prince Vladimir" will guard the country's security.
This is a 4+ generation ship.
According to its technical possibilities and thelevel of automatisation, this is the most formidable weapon that the Navy has acquired over the past few years.
In the near future, the crew will begin to serve.
The ship became like a family to us.
The crew, myself, and submarine feel like one family.
Currently, four more submarines of this class are under construction, and in the next three years, the Russian Navy will receive more than 60 modern warships and submarines.


russia-insider--2020-06-17--The BBC's New Propaganda Film About the 'Salisbury Poisonings' Is a Pack of Lies Aimed at Russia

This is just the first of 3 series , head over to Murray 's blog , linked below , for highly entertaining critiques of parts 2 and 3 Shakespeare ’ s heirs at the BBC produced this deathless and entirely convincing line as the climax of the first episode of “ The Salisbury Poisonings ” , a three part piece of state propaganda on the Skripal saga , of which I watched Part 1 as it was broadcast last night .
The other two parts are to be broadcast today and tomorrow , which unusual scheduling reflects the importance our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the resilience of the great British nation under attack by devilish foreigners .
You can watch all three episodes now on BBC iPlayer , but personally I suffer from overactive antibodies to bullshit and need a break .
The line about Putin was delivered by salty , ex-British military Ross Cassidy , so of course was entirely convincing .
It may have been more so had he ever said it in public before this week , but there you are .
To judge by social media , an extraordinary proportion of the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I find myself unable to pretend that does not fill me with despair at the future of democracy .
That anybody could listen to the following dialogue without doubling up in laughter is completely beyond me .
I do not quite understand how the actors managed to speak it .
Aah yes , it was cold .
A factor those pesky Russians had overlooked , because of course it is never cold in Russia .
And everybody knows it is minus 40 inside Zizzis and inside the Bishops Mill pub .
Once the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only in the most extreme conditions could exterior temperature have any kind of effect at all .
Neither Sergei nor Yulia was anyway outdoors for any significant period after supposedly being poisoned by their door handle .
Many wildly improbable stories have been produced by the security services over the last three years to explain why this ultra deadly nerve agent did not kill the Skripals .
Interestingly enough , the BBC drama left out a detail which the Daily Mail alleged came from a security service briefing , that : Which is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is no more of a coincidence than the Chief Nurse of the British Army being right there when they first collapsed on a bench .
Yet in all the multiple attempts to explain the non-deadly deadly nerve agent , “ it was cold ” appears to be a new one .
It must have official approval , because all purpose security service shill , warmonger and chemical weapons expert , Lt Col Hamish De Bretton Gordon was listed in the credits as “ military advisor ” to this BBC production .
Let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wisdom , for nothing : when the state broadcaster starts to make propaganda videos that credit a “ military advisor ” , you are well on the way to fascism .
Perhaps wisely , Part One at least of the BBC Drama made no attempt at all to portray how the alleged poisoning happened .
How the Skripals went out that morning , caught widely on CCTV , to the cemetery according to this version , and then returned home without being caught coming back .
How while they were back in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , at midday in broad daylight on a very open estate , applied deadly nerve agent to the Skripals ’ door handle , apparently without the benefit of personal protective equipment , and without being seen by anybody .
How the Skripals then left again and contrived for both of them to touch the exterior door handle in closing the door .
How , with this incredibly toxic nerve agent on them , they were out for three and a half hours , fed the ducks , went to the pub and went @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both collapsing on a park bench .
How despite being different ages , sexes , body shapes and metabolisms they both collapsed , after this three hour plus delay , at exactly the same moment , so neither could call for help .
The BBC simply could not make a drama showing the purported actions that morning of the Skripals without it being blindingly obvious that the story is impossible .
Luckily for them , we live in such a haze of British Nationalist fervor that much of the population , especially the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , will simply overlook that .
The omission of the actual “ poisoning ” from “ The Salisbury Poisonings ” is apparently just an artistic decision .
All those events happened before the timeline of this BBC Drama started .
The BBC version started the moment people came to help the Skripals on the bench .
However it omitted that the very first person to see them and come to help was , by an incredible coincidence , the Chief Nurse of the British Army .
That the chief military nurse was on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would have thought the BBC would want to include it in their “ drama ” .
Apparently not .
Evidently another artistic decision .
The time from touching the door handle to the Skripals being attended by paramedics was about four hours .
That Naloxone is effective four hours after contact with an ultra deadly nerve agent is remarkable .
I do not want to under-represent the personal suffering of policeman Nick Bailey nor his family .
But he was shown in the drama as rubbing this “ deadliest synthetic substance ” directly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but then not getting seriously ill for at least another 24 hours .
Plainly all could not be what it seems .
The actual poisoning event , the specialist team coincidentally at the hospital and the Army Chief Nurse were not the only conspicuous omissions .
Also missing was Skripal ’ s MI6 handler and Salisbury neighbour Pablo Miller , who did not rate so much as a mention .
The other strange thing is that the drama constantly cut to newsreel coverage of actual events , but omitted the BBC ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Skripal event in those first three days , which were all presented by BBC Diplomatic Editor Mark Urban .
Now Mark Urban happens to have been in the Royal Tank Regiment with Skripal ’ s MI6 handler , Pablo Miller .
Not distantly , but joining the regiment together at the same rank in the same officer intake on the same day .
I do love a lot of good coincidences in a plot .
Mark Urban had also met frequently with Sergei Skripal in the year before the alleged attack , to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when Urban fronted the BBC ’ s Skripal coverage those first few days , he kept both those highly pertinent facts hidden from the public .
In fact he kept them hidden for four full months .
I wonder why Mark Urban ’ s lead BBC coverage was not included in the newsreel footage of this BBC re-enactment ?
There is much , much more that is wildly improbable about this gross propaganda product and I must save some scorn and some facts for the next two episodes .
Do read this quick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these ten questions has the BBC Drama addressed convincingly , and how many has it dodged or skated over ?
Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative , the 77th Brigade , Bellingcat , the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations , this blog has no source of state , corporate or institutional finance whatsoever .
It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article , but welcome the alternative voice , insider information and debate .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ gratefully received .

This is just the first of 3 series, head over to Murray's blog, linked below, for highly entertaining critiques of parts 2 and 3
"Putin's gonna get me!"
Shakespeare’s heirs at the BBC produced this deathless and entirely convincing line as the climax of the first episode of “The Salisbury Poisonings”, a three part piece of state propaganda on the Skripal saga, of which I watched Part 1 as it was broadcast last night. The other two parts are to be broadcast today and tomorrow, which unusual scheduling reflects the importance our masters place on this stirring tale of the resilience of the great British nation under attack by devilish foreigners. You can watch all three episodes now on BBC iPlayer, but personally I suffer from overactive antibodies to bullshit and need a break.
The line about Putin was delivered by salty, ex-British military Ross Cassidy, so of course was entirely convincing. It may have been more so had he ever said it in public before this week, but there you are.
To judge by social media, an extraordinary proportion of the public find the official narrative entirely convincing. I find myself unable to pretend that does not fill me with despair at the future of democracy. That anybody could listen to the following dialogue without doubling up in laughter is completely beyond me. I do not quite understand how the actors managed to speak it.
Porton Down Man: “And it’s one of the deadliest synthetic substances on earth. It’s so toxic that a spoonful, with the right delivery mechanism, could kill thousands”.
Heroic Public Health Lady: “But if it’s so toxic, how come the Skripals are still alive?”
Porton Down Man: “The paramedics assumed that they had overdosed on fentanyl so they gave them a shot of Naloxone, which happens to combat nerve agent toxicity. Plus, it was cold, further inhibiting the speed with which the substance took effect.”
Aah yes, it was cold. A factor those pesky Russians had overlooked, because of course it is never cold in Russia. And everybody knows it is minus 40 inside Zizzis and inside the Bishops Mill pub. Once the nerve agent has entered the body, only in the most extreme conditions could exterior temperature have any kind of effect at all. Neither Sergei nor Yulia was anyway outdoors for any significant period after supposedly being poisoned by their door handle.
Many wildly improbable stories have been produced by the security services over the last three years to explain why this ultra deadly nerve agent did not kill the Skripals. Interestingly enough, the BBC drama left out a detail which the Daily Mail alleged came from a security service briefing, that:
“Completely by chance, doctors with specialist chemical weapons training were on duty at the hospital when the victims were admitted. They treated Sergei and Yulia Skripal with an atropine (antidote) and other medicines approved by scientists from Porton Down, the government’s top secret scientific research laboratory”
Which is very believable, I suppose, because it is no more of a coincidence than the Chief Nurse of the British Army being right there when they first collapsed on a bench.
Yet in all the multiple attempts to explain the non-deadly deadly nerve agent, “it was cold” appears to be a new one. It must have official approval, because all purpose security service shill, warmonger and chemical weapons expert, Lt Col Hamish De Bretton Gordon was listed in the credits as “military advisor” to this BBC production.
Let me offer you this tiny smidgeon of wisdom, for nothing: when the state broadcaster starts to make propaganda videos that credit a “military advisor”, you are well on the way to fascism.
Perhaps wisely, Part One at least of the BBC Drama made no attempt at all to portray how the alleged poisoning happened. How the Skripals went out that morning, caught widely on CCTV, to the cemetery according to this version, and then returned home without being caught coming back. How while they were back in their house two Russian agents rocked up and, at midday in broad daylight on a very open estate, applied deadly nerve agent to the Skripals’ door handle, apparently without the benefit of personal protective equipment, and without being seen by anybody. How the Skripals then left again and contrived for both of them to touch the exterior door handle in closing the door. How, with this incredibly toxic nerve agent on them, they were out for three and a half hours, fed the ducks, went to the pub and went to Zizzis, eating heartily, before both collapsing on a park bench. How despite being different ages, sexes, body shapes and metabolisms they both collapsed, after this three hour plus delay, at exactly the same moment, so neither could call for help.
The BBC simply could not make a drama showing the purported actions that morning of the Skripals without it being blindingly obvious that the story is impossible. Luckily for them, we live in such a haze of British Nationalist fervor that much of the population, especially the mainstream media journalists and the Blairite warmongers, will simply overlook that. The omission of the actual “poisoning” from “The Salisbury Poisonings” is apparently just an artistic decision.
All those events happened before the timeline of this BBC Drama started. The BBC version started the moment people came to help the Skripals on the bench. However it omitted that the very first person to see them and come to help was, by an incredible coincidence, the Chief Nurse of the British Army. That the chief military nurse was on hand is such an amazing coincidence you would have thought the BBC would want to include it in their “drama”. Apparently not. Evidently another artistic decision.
The time from touching the door handle to the Skripals being attended by paramedics was about four hours. That Naloxone is effective four hours after contact with an ultra deadly nerve agent is remarkable.
I do not want to under-represent the personal suffering of policeman Nick Bailey nor his family. But he was shown in the drama as rubbing this “deadliest synthetic substance” directly into the soft tissues around his eye, but then not getting seriously ill for at least another 24 hours. Plainly all could not be what it seems.
The actual poisoning event, the specialist team coincidentally at the hospital and the Army Chief Nurse were not the only conspicuous omissions. Also missing was Skripal’s MI6 handler and Salisbury neighbour Pablo Miller, who did not rate so much as a mention. The other strange thing is that the drama constantly cut to newsreel coverage of actual events, but omitted the BBC’s own flagship news items on the Skripal event in those first three days, which were all presented by BBC Diplomatic Editor Mark Urban.
Now Mark Urban happens to have been in the Royal Tank Regiment with Skripal’s MI6 handler, Pablo Miller. Not distantly, but joining the regiment together at the same rank in the same officer intake on the same day. I do love a lot of good coincidences in a plot. Mark Urban had also met frequently with Sergei Skripal in the year before the alleged attack, to “research a book”. Yet when Urban fronted the BBC’s Skripal coverage those first few days, he kept both those highly pertinent facts hidden from the public. In fact he kept them hidden for four full months. I wonder why Mark Urban’s lead BBC coverage was not included in the newsreel footage of this BBC re-enactment?
There is much, much more that is wildly improbable about this gross propaganda product and I must save some scorn and some facts for the next two episodes. Do read this quick refresher in the meantime. How many of these ten questions has the BBC Drama addressed convincingly, and how many has it dodged or skated over?
Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.
Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.


russia-insider--2020-06-18--Scorched Earth in Syria - Washington's New Policy

While the world focuses on the battle with the SARS-CoV-2 virus , the situation in Syria grinds on with the United States playing the role of spoiler .
Let 's start with this excerpt from a recent Hudson Institute livestream event entitled `` Maximum Pressure on the Assad Regime For its Chemical Weapons Use and Other Atrocities `` .
In attendance , was Ambassador James Jeffery , Special Representative for Syria Engagement and Special Enjoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS .
When asked the following about Syria and America 's role in the nation : But the place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
I mean , we have no major economic interests , right ?
The Assad regime does not pose a direct threat to the United States and so on , but it ’ s at the crossroads of all these other issues .
So it ’ s hard to get the level of commitment right .
Because to a lot of people , it just doesn ’ t seem to make sense .
`` ... that ’ s why we are pursuing what we think is a smart policy , a very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specific goal , to go after ISIS .
Supporting military operations of other countries , in various ways , Turkey , Israel , in focusing on economic and diplomatic pressure .
Our military presence , while small is important to this whole overall calculation .
So we urge the Congress , the American people , the president to keep these forces on .
But again , this isn ’ t Afghanistan .
This isn ’ t Vietnam .
This isn ’ t a quagmire .
My job is to make it a quagmire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children affected around 91,800 children with another 865,300 experiencing micronutrient deficiencies .
Some regions were worse than others ; in the governorates of Aleppo , Idlib and Hama , 31.9 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months received a minimum acceptable diet .
This chronic food shortage has led the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations to assist Syria 's farmers to grow food as shown here : Obviously , it is very clear that Syrians are suffering even as the nine-year-long civil war winds down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two news items that did n't get widespread coverage in the West : , an American convoy was recently intercepted in Hasaka by the Syrian Arab Army and local men , the same part of the country where the recent crop fires took place : , an American convoy was recently intercepted in Hasaka by the Syrian Arab Army and local men , the same part of the country where the recent crop fires took place : According to SANA , an American convoy was recently intercepted in Hasaka by the Syrian Arab @ @ @ @ @ @ @ part of the country where the recent crop fires took place : The fact that Washington 's Special Representative for Syrian Engagement , James Jeffrey , has made it very clear that his goal in Syria is to create a `` Vietnam '' for Russia suggests that the recent reports from SANA regarding the burning of cereal crops is quite likely based on fact and that American forces could well have been behind the burning of much needed food .
Washington seems incapable of admitting that its nine year effort to rid the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colossal failure .
The US 's military sense of honor has been completely destroyed by the influence of Jewish thinking - now they are burning the fields of poor Syrian peasants

While the world focuses on the battle with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the situation in Syria grinds on with the United States playing the role of spoiler.
Let's start with this excerpt from a recent Hudson Institute livestream event entitled " Maximum Pressure on the Assad Regime For its Chemical Weapons Use and Other Atrocities ". In attendance, was Ambassador James Jeffery, Special Representative for Syria Engagement and Special Enjoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. When asked the following about Syria and America's role in the nation:
But the place itself, we have no interest in it. I mean, we have no major economic interests, right? The Assad regime does not pose a direct threat to the United States and so on, but it’s at the crossroads of all these other issues. So it’s hard to get the level of commitment right. Because to a lot of people, it just doesn’t seem to make sense.
... here is what Jeffrey had to say in response:
"...that’s why we are pursuing what we think is a smart policy, a very limited American military presence for a very specific goal, to go after ISIS. Supporting military operations of other countries, in various ways, Turkey, Israel, in focusing on economic and diplomatic pressure. Our military presence, while small is important to this whole overall calculation. So we urge the Congress, the American people, the president to keep these forces on. But again, this isn’t Afghanistan. This isn’t Vietnam. This isn’t a quagmire. My job is to make it a quagmire for the Russians.
Let's look at one of the key issues affecting Syrians, a shortage of food. According to the Food Security Information Network's 2020 Global Report on Food Crises , we find the following information about Syria's food insecurity:
Here is a map of Syria showing the geographic distribution of people in need of food security and agricultural assistance in 2019:
Acute malnutrition among children affected around 91,800 children with another 865,300 experiencing micronutrient deficiencies. Some regions were worse than others; in the governorates of Aleppo, Idlib and Hama, 31.9 percent of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months received a minimum acceptable diet.
This chronic food shortage has led the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations to assist Syria's farmers to grow food as shown here:
Obviously, it is very clear that Syrians are suffering even as the nine-year-long civil war winds down.


russia-insider--2020-06-18--'Elites' Control America by Dividing Her into Many Squabbling Factions - It's Deliberate (FTN Podcas

'Elites' Control America by Dividing Her into Many Squabbling Factions - It's Deliberate (FTN Podcast + Transcript)

y2mate.com - Divided Politics and Fractured Thinking_ How the System Achieves Immunity_4WAPN2_3FXs.mp3 transcript powered by Sonix—easily convert your audio to text with Sonix .
y2mate.com - Divided Politics and Fractured Thinking_ How the System Achieves Immunity_4WAPN2_3FXs.mp3 was automatically transcribed by Sonix with the latest audio-to-text algorithms .
This transcript may contain errors .
Sonix is the best audio automated transcription service in 2020 .
Our automated transcription algorithms works with many of the popular audio file formats .
Modern America was founded in 1945 , a modern America was founded with the end of this of of World War Two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ratified itself in 1965 with civil rights and the Immigration Act .
And that 's when when modern America , as we know it , came into being .
They want to make it so that that is where America where America started .
Full stop .
Right .
All of this this history pre the end of World War Two is n't convenient for them because there are a lot of things people can look back to , white people can look back to as being better times , as being , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that was more real , that was better for them .
A society created for them by people like them , heroes that looked like them , heroes they can relate to .
They need to smash all of that .
And and so , yeah , that 's that 's why they 're doing this .
And it 's not just , you know , we predicted it would be Jefferson and they 've done Jefferson .
And I saw Columbus .
The Columbus statue was beheaded .
But they 're going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like Cecil Rhodes Wright , who is a problematic figure in and of itself .
You know , from our perspective , who had his problems .
You know , they 're throwing his statue into the harbor .
They 're going after and , you know , in the UK , I saw they were throwing these statues of guys who were slave holders or something into the harbor .
But do you think the people doing that , like , knew who that guy was like ?
Oh , yeah .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ you know , big slave older .
Yeah .
Them in the river .
No , they saw a white face .
They saw a white man as a statue .
And they knew no matter what he did , no matter who he was , because he 's white , he gets thrown in the river , he gets around .
He 's he 's done .
He 's being replaced .
So that 's why they 're doing this .
I mean , they 're not targeting these people for specific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all white symbology .
That 's always been what this is about .
And the more it is allowed to continue , which it 's it seems like it 's going to be , hopefully the more people will will be able to see this and see that we were right when we were solving this .
It 's it and it 's also part of sort of a natural political cycle , too .
And it leads to a new normal .
Yes .
So it 's it 's not that .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Right .
We used to think there was a show we did a long time ago called A Pendulum 's and Machetes .
And we talked about how fake and gay the pendulum , because it 's like a thing the boomers say .
It 's like all the pendulum always swings back on the other direction .
Well , it 's simulated .
It swings , but it 's simulated because they ca n't ever let one side gain too much political power or allow it to get too much of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system is always advancing in a certain direction .
Right .
So it swings back and forth .
You know , for a while it gives it makes whites feel like they they have moral authority and they , you know , put all their copes and Donald Trump .
And then it 's where they they swing that door back shut and they swing it back to the other side and you 're going to have anti white shit for a while .
That 's just what they did .
They did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ George W. Bush was not in the way that Trump was at all , but that was back in the arts .
That was a time when people were deeply invested in defending America , being patriotic and , you know , taking down going after these terrorists and whatever else .
But then you got a lot of you know , then whites are getting a little bit too big for their britches .
And you had to have America is still a very racist country and it was time for healing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Barack Obama is supposed to heal the country .
And then you have Donald Trump come back and then it 's back and forth and they 're just gon na keep doing this .
But it 's all simulated .
The problem is the sort of casual observers of the political system that do n't understand how it works .
Think that that 's some sort of natural cycle .
But in reality , there have been a lot of people have written about this , that this sort of fake and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keep it going , is actually a very stable way to govern , because if you actually give people what they want .
If you actually give these tribal factions what they want , then you 're eventually just going to have war after war , after war , because you 're going to have especially in a country like America , because it 's gon na become a racial battle .
But instead , they just keep everybody divided .
Right .
In the 1960s with Finkelstein , the the strategy was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these two political parties that are not all that different now , though , that , you know , they 're not all that far away from each other .
They 're mostly white .
And we 're gon na do all this fucked up shit in 1965 with heart seller and civil rights and all kinds of other things we talked about on the show .
And then how do we keep these people from having a goy , Lasch ?
Right .
How are you going to have people from reform @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to start splitting them apart .
We have to divide them into conservatives and into liberals and make those people hate each other .
And then we 're gon na we 're gon na give black civil rights and do all this other shit that they did in the meantime .
And this system has just continued on and on and on and as the country has gotten browner .
And they 've pitted people against each other , now it 's capitalism versus socialism , and people fall for those traps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And they have you know , it 's ended up in this situation that we 're in now .
And it 's just a natural part of the political cycle .
Like you could almost have predicted that there was going to be a massive demoralization of whites coming very soon , because while you have a president who is n't going to deliver what those white people want and you have them being browbeaten on the other side , it 's a great way to collapse white support for any sort of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who tried to stand up and run in this kind of in this kind of a cycle .
I would immediately assume that that person is some sort of a pied piper because they want they want to give people hope again , too , for somebody running for office , some political office who is saying totally embrace rhetoric , and then they trot out all these supporters and then they smash them again .
So I 'd be highly skeptical .
But that 's not what they 're going to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no hope for any sort of political solution .
And they 're going to get they 're gon na get blacks very animated , which they have in all of the white allies of blacks , keep whites divided and they are going to get rid of Donald Trump .
And that 's that 's the plan .
And it 's like , you know , no skin off our back , except that you 're just going to get you 're gon na get a different flavor of of sort of Zionism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to be Ignat and it 's not gon na be anybody appealing to white interests .
And that 's that 's done .
That 's pretty much done .
And the lesson learned .
One more thing , because I know you 're trying to get in there is they are going to say , see Donald Trump 's nativism , that he was never going to deliver on Donald Trump 's racism .
That was n't real .
He was always a Jewish candidate .
Is a loser .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lost the election and see , this is why , because nobody wants white nationalism .
Nobody wants immigration .
Nobody wants any of these things that Donald Trump promised but never delivered on will leave that sort of those details to the side .
But the story will be that this strategy failed because there 's nothing wrong about Trump 's strategy .
It was a success .
People liked it was very popular .
He just did n't deliver on it .
There are things he could 've done better .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ without getting too sort of autistic about it .
It 's that they will make this as much about a demoralization of people who supported that ideal allergy , even though it was fake as well .
And that 's that 's also the purpose here .
That 's also why they 're doing this .
Yeah , and they have the ability to keep that demoralisation in place to run with four or eight or whatever years of biting if they choose .
And then in eight years , they can re-evaluate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Take stock of how far the demographic clock has ticked .
And if they feel they need to do another another , you know , gin up Whitey and bring him out into the open so we could smash him again .
They have a bench that they 're working on right now of candidates .
They could run and come out and have say it , have them say totally based things , have them say all lives matter , have them take the right tone on race and crime and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feel the need to , they can do this and , you know , read , rinse , rinse and repeat , do the same that they did in 2016 .
If they feel they need to , they might .
They might not .
But that 's in there in their .
And they never wanted Trump to be president , too .
This is something we 've talked about before as well , is he 's been sort of a jerk .
That interruption like this is this is inconvenient for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appealing to white interests .
They do n't like where this is going .
Finckel Finkelstein is dead .
He 's been dead for twenty seventeen .
They were already talking about how he had gone too far with the Soros and Auburn stuff .
That was already a bridge too far .
They were already getting criticism for that .
They did n't want to go any further .
Trump took it further just to get in , just to give Israel what it wants .
And sure , it yeah , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But this is the argument .
This is the argument .
It 's do we take what we can now and get as much land in our lifetimes as we can ?
Because you know that playing into Netanyahu 's thinking as well as can I get this stuff done under my legacy ?
Sure , I can think long term and think , yeah , you know , 300 years from now we have to accomplish what we can for the Jews .
Right .
But he wants to do it for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lot of what 's driving the dignitaries .
Like , I want this stuff .
Now , this is whether ghetto Jews , they want it now .
Let 's get all the pieces on the board .
Let 's do it now .
Whereas the people that want to do this in a more slow roll manner , I think their argument is we need to solve this problem with white people and then we 'll get what we want eventually anyway .
So you guys are sort of trying to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while there are still a lot of white people left and a lot of white people who still have a lot of these sentiments , the process is n't complete .
It 's still half baked .
And you guys are trying to do this now , so they do n't want to do that .
It 's also an interruption to a lot of the things that they 've been trying to do .
And it also moralized whites , if if not temporarily , the reason why Biden is such a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people do n't look at any Zucco .
Why is this befuddled old fool ?
Why is this a good thing ?
It 's like that 's actually the perfect play , because people wo n't take it seriously .
They 're gon na have somebody else running the show .
But on top of that , Biden is white and Biden .
We told you he was one of the people who voted to give Robert E. Lee citizenship back right in the Senate .
But he 's also done a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bill and all these other things that he 's done that when when when even the Democratic Party had to support law and order sort of interests and whatever .
He 's the perfect guy to be that white guy who has had a change of heart .
And it 's time to do things much differently .
And I was wrong about all these things that I used to believe in and now we 're gon na be doing .
It 's far more powerful than a non-white who may excite the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you know , whatever and whatever , blah , blah , blah .
But it also whets the appetite for , oh , you know , this is n't a white this is a white candidate .
It 's not who I wanted .
But you have the guy out there is somebody who 's sort of leading the charge for other whites to do the most cupped thing possible .
People will fall for that .
I 'm just lunchbox Joe , the working class guy .
I was wrong about all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to let blacks out of jail .
And , you know , I was wrong about , you know , being friends with segregationists .
I was wrong about just about everything and , you know , blah , blah , blah , blah , blah .
And it 's a white person is a much better avatar for that .
That 's why Jews do the fellow wipe it .
So he 's kind of it 's kind of an ingenious format in that way because there are n't other whites out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ once had shitty positions that a lot of people agree with in private .
Still to this day , law and order , segregation , everything .
He can be the guy that says , you know what , I was wrong about all that and save his legacy , be in there for one term and be done .
And then they put some non-white in there and kind of continue the process .
And there 's never gon na be a pendulum swinging back the other way .
There was n't @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other way in 2016 .
It was supposed to be Hillary and continue on and on and on forever .
And I 'm not saying Democrats good .
And Republicans , you know , all this stuff like that , people sort of fall for .
I 'm just telling you what they plan to do .
So , yeah , there you have .
Automatically convert your audio files to text with Sonix .
Sonix is the best online , automated transcription service .
Sonix uses cutting-edge artificial intelligence to convert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audio means a higher transcript accuracy rate .
Here are five reasons you should transcribe your podcast with Sonix .
Manual audio transcription is tedious and expensive .
Do you have a podcast ?
Here 's how to automatically transcribe your podcasts with Sonix .
Automated transcription is getting more accurate with each passing day .
Automated transcription can quickly transcribe your skype calls .
All of your remote meetings will be better indexed with a Sonix transcript .
More computing power makes audio-to-text faster and more efficient .
Quickly and accurately convert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sonix uses cutting-edge artificial intelligence to convert your mp3 files to text .
Sonix is the best online audio transcription software in 2020—it 's fast , easy , and affordable .
If you are looking for a great way to convert your audio to text , try Sonix today .

y2mate.com - Divided Politics and Fractured Thinking_ How the System Achieves Immunity_4WAPN2_3FXs.mp3 was automatically transcribed by Sonix with the latest audio-to-text algorithms. This transcript may contain errors. Sonix is the best audio automated transcription service in 2020. Our automated transcription algorithms works with many of the popular audio file formats.
Modern America was founded in 1945, a modern America was founded with the end of this of of World War Two and really came into its own really ratified itself in 1965 with civil rights and the Immigration Act. And that's when when modern America, as we know it, came into being. They want to make it so that that is where America where America started. Full stop. Right. All of this this history pre the end of World War Two isn't convenient for them because there are a lot of things people can look back to, white people can look back to as being better times, as being, you know, something something a society that was more real, that was better for them. A society created for them by people like them, heroes that looked like them, heroes they can relate to. They need to smash all of that. And and so, yeah, that's that's why they're doing this. And it's not just, you know, we predicted it would be Jefferson and they've done Jefferson. And I saw Columbus. The Columbus statue was beheaded. But they're going after. I mean, like people like Cecil Rhodes Wright, who is a problematic figure in and of itself.
You know, from our perspective, who had his problems. You know, they're throwing his statue into the harbor. They're going after and, you know, in the UK, I saw they were throwing these statues of guys who were slave holders or something into the harbor. But do you think the people doing that, like, knew who that guy was like? Oh, yeah. This guy from the 16th century, you know, big slave older. Yeah. Them in the river. No, they saw a white face. They saw a white man as a statue. And they knew no matter what he did, no matter who he was, because he's white, he gets thrown in the river, he gets around. He's he's done. He's being replaced. So that's why they're doing this. I mean, they're not targeting these people for specific ideological reasons. They want to remove all white symbology. That's always been what this is about. And the more it is allowed to continue, which it's it seems like it's going to be, hopefully the more people will will be able to see this and see that we were right when we were solving this.
It's it and it's also part of sort of a natural political cycle, too. And it leads to a new normal. Yes. So it's it's not that. But this is the simulated swinging pendulum. Right. We used to think there was a show we did a long time ago called A Pendulum's and Machetes. And we talked about how fake and gay the pendulum, because it's like a thing the boomers say. It's like all the pendulum always swings back on the other direction. Well, it's simulated. It swings, but it's simulated because they can't ever let one side gain too much political power or allow it to get too much of it what it wants. But the system is always advancing in a certain direction. Right. So it swings back and forth. You know, for a while it gives it makes whites feel like they they have moral authority and they, you know, put all their copes and Donald Trump. And then it's where they they swing that door back shut and they swing it back to the other side and you're going to have anti white shit for a while. That's just what they did. They did this. They did. Now, George W. Bush was not in the way that Trump was at all, but that was back in the arts.
That was a time when people were deeply invested in defending America, being patriotic and, you know, taking down going after these terrorists and whatever else. But then you got a lot of you know, then whites are getting a little bit too big for their britches. And you had to have America is still a very racist country and it was time for healing. We had to have Barack Obama. Barack Obama is supposed to heal the country. And then you have Donald Trump come back and then it's back and forth and they're just gonna keep doing this. But it's all simulated. The problem is the sort of casual observers of the political system that don't understand how it works. Think that that's some sort of natural cycle. But in reality, there have been a lot of people have written about this, that this sort of fake and gay political paradigm, if they can keep it going, is actually a very stable way to govern, because if you actually give people what they want. If you actually give these tribal factions what they want, then you're eventually just going to have war after war, after war, because you're going to have especially in a country like America, because it's gonna become a racial battle.
But instead, they just keep everybody divided. Right. In the 1960s with Finkelstein, the the strategy was, how are we going to take these two political parties that are not all that different now, though, that, you know, they're not all that far away from each other. They're mostly white. And we're gonna do all this fucked up shit in 1965 with heart seller and civil rights and all kinds of other things we talked about on the show. And then how do we keep these people from having a goy, Lasch? Right. How are you going to have people from reform reacting to this? Well, we have to start splitting them apart. We have to divide them into conservatives and into liberals and make those people hate each other. And then we're gonna we're gonna give black civil rights and do all this other shit that they did in the meantime. And this system has just continued on and on and on and as the country has gotten browner. And they've pitted people against each other, now it's capitalism versus socialism, and people fall for those traps over and over and over again. And they have you know, it's ended up in this situation that we're in now. And it's just a natural part of the political cycle. Like you could almost have predicted that there was going to be a massive demoralization of whites coming very soon, because while you have a president who isn't going to deliver what those white people want and you have them being browbeaten on the other side, it's a great way to collapse white support for any sort of candidate, because think of a candidate who tried to stand up and run in this kind of in this kind of a cycle.
I would immediately assume that that person is some sort of a pied piper because they want they want to give people hope again, too, for somebody running for office, some political office who is saying totally embrace rhetoric, and then they trot out all these supporters and then they smash them again. So I'd be highly skeptical. But that's not what they're going to do.
They're going to give whites no hope for any sort of political solution. And they're going to get they're gonna get blacks very animated, which they have in all of the white allies of blacks, keep whites divided and they are going to get rid of Donald Trump. And that's that's the plan. And it's like, you know, no skin off our back, except that you're just going to get you're gonna get a different flavor of of sort of Zionism Jewish advancement. It's just not going to be Ignat and it's not gonna be anybody appealing to white interests. And that's that's done. That's pretty much done. And the lesson learned.
One more thing, because I know you're trying to get in there is they are going to say, see Donald Trump's nativism, that he was never going to deliver on Donald Trump's racism. That wasn't real. He was always a Jewish candidate. Is a loser. This is not what people want. Donald Trump lost the election and see, this is why, because nobody wants white nationalism. Nobody wants immigration. Nobody wants any of these things that Donald Trump promised but never delivered on will leave that sort of those details to the side. But the story will be that this strategy failed because there's nothing wrong about Trump's strategy. It was a success. People liked it was very popular. He just didn't deliver on it. There are things he could've done better. But I think people get my point without getting too sort of autistic about it. It's that they will make this as much about a demoralization of people who supported that ideal allergy, even though it was fake as well. And that's that's also the purpose here. That's also why they're doing this.
Yeah, and they have the ability to keep that demoralisation in place to run with four or eight or whatever years of biting if they choose. And then in eight years, they can re-evaluate and take stock of where they are. Take stock of how far the demographic clock has ticked. And if they feel they need to do another another, you know, gin up Whitey and bring him out into the open so we could smash him again. They have a bench that they're working on right now of candidates. They could run and come out and have say it, have them say totally based things, have them say all lives matter, have them take the right tone on race and crime and immigration. And if they if they feel the need to, they can do this and, you know, read, rinse, rinse and repeat, do the same that they did in 2016. If they feel they need to, they might. They might not. But that's in there in their.
And they never wanted Trump to be president, too. This is something we've talked about before as well, is he's been sort of a jerk. That interruption like this is this is inconvenient for them. They didn't want somebody appealing to white interests. They don't like where this is going. Finckel Finkelstein is dead. He's been dead for twenty seventeen. They were already talking about how he had gone too far with the Soros and Auburn stuff. That was already a bridge too far. They were already getting criticism for that. They didn't want to go any further. Trump took it further just to get in, just to give Israel what it wants. And sure, it yeah, that's what they wanted anyway. But this is the argument. This is the argument. It's do we take what we can now and get as much land in our lifetimes as we can?
Because you know that playing into Netanyahu's thinking as well as can I get this stuff done under my legacy? Sure, I can think long term and think, yeah, you know, 300 years from now we have to accomplish what we can for the Jews. Right. But he wants to do it for himself. That's what it's a lot of what's driving the dignitaries. Like, I want this stuff. Now, this is whether ghetto Jews, they want it now. Let's get all the pieces on the board. Let's do it now. Whereas the people that want to do this in a more slow roll manner, I think their argument is we need to solve this problem with white people and then we'll get what we want eventually anyway. So you guys are sort of trying to do this and play a dangerous game while there are still a lot of white people left and a lot of white people who still have a lot of these sentiments, the process isn't complete. It's still half baked. And you guys are trying to do this now, so they don't want to do that. It's also an interruption to a lot of the things that they've been trying to do. And it also moralized whites, if if not temporarily, the reason why Biden is such a good candidate for them, even though people don't look at any Zucco. Why is this befuddled old fool? Why is this a good thing? It's like that's actually the perfect play, because people won't take it seriously. They're gonna have somebody else running the show. But on top of that, Biden is white and Biden. We told you he was one of the people who voted to give Robert E. Lee citizenship back right in the Senate. But he's also done a lot of other things, including the crime bill and all these other things that he's done that when when when even the Democratic Party had to support law and order sort of interests and whatever.
He's the perfect guy to be that white guy who has had a change of heart.
And it's time to do things much differently. And I was wrong about all these things that I used to believe in and now we're gonna be doing. It's far more powerful than a non-white who may excite the black base and come in and, you know, whatever and whatever, blah, blah, blah. But it also whets the appetite for, oh, you know, this isn't a white this is a white candidate. It's not who I wanted. But you have the guy out there is somebody who's sort of leading the charge for other whites to do the most cupped thing possible. People will fall for that. I'm just lunchbox Joe, the working class guy. I was wrong about all this law and order. We need to let blacks out of jail. And, you know, I was wrong about, you know, being friends with segregationists. I was wrong about just about everything and, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And it's a white person is a much better avatar for that. That's why Jews do the fellow wipe it. So he's kind of it's kind of an ingenious format in that way because there aren't other whites out there who can do that. Who once had shitty positions that a lot of people agree with in private. Still to this day, law and order, segregation, everything. He can be the guy that says, you know what, I was wrong about all that and save his legacy, be in there for one term and be done. And then they put some non-white in there and kind of continue the process. And there's never gonna be a pendulum swinging back the other way.
There wasn't supposed to be a pendulum swinging back the other way in 2016. It was supposed to be Hillary and continue on and on and on forever. And I'm not saying Democrats good. And Republicans, you know, all this stuff like that, people sort of fall for. I'm just telling you what they plan to do. So, yeah, there you have.
Sonix uses cutting-edge artificial intelligence to convert your mp3 files to text.
Better audio means a higher transcript accuracy rate. Here are five reasons you should transcribe your podcast with Sonix. Manual audio transcription is tedious and expensive. Do you have a podcast? Here's how to automatically transcribe your podcasts with Sonix. Automated transcription is getting more accurate with each passing day. Automated transcription can quickly transcribe your skype calls. All of your remote meetings will be better indexed with a Sonix transcript. More computing power makes audio-to-text faster and more efficient. Quickly and accurately convert your audio to text with Sonix.
Sonix is the best online audio transcription software in 2020—it's fast, easy, and affordable.
If you are looking for a great way to convert your audio to text, try Sonix today.