russia-insider--2020-05-05--The Suppressed History of Jewish Red Terror in Europe and Russia After WW1

“ To overcome our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism .
We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia ’ s population .
As for the rest , we have nothing to say to them .
They must be annihilated.
” — Grigory Zinoviev ( aka Hirsch Apfelbaum ) , 1918 With the latest series of events involving police yokelism and the false Hegelian race and political dialectic , we must remember that one of the agendas of the Crime Syndicate is to bring police under centralized , national control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law enforcement look like bumpkins , not up to the job .
This would be akin to the Soviet Cheka running all police .
This will be unmitigated hell .
For some curious reason , Hollywood and the media scarcely pays the slightest attention to the history of the Bolshevik Red Terror .
You won ’ t get much of the story on History Channel either .
One would never guess that 40 million ethnic Russians and Ukrainians were murdered by thugs and goons over two decades starting in 1918 .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goes along way toward explaining the 1920s so-called Fascist or Nationalist counter-reaction and widespread “ anti-semitism ” throughout Europe .
The destabilized populations of Europe post WWI were naturally terrified of Trotskyite ( Leon Trotsky , aka Lev Davidovich Bronstein ) red terrorists .
Bolshevism , Red Terror and Judaism were conflated as the same thing in most Europeans ’ minds of the post WW I era .
“ Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.
” – Rabbi Stephen S. Wise , in the American Bulletin of May 15 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Jewish revolution ” – The Maccabean ( New York ) , Nov. 1905 , p , 250 “ Jewry is the mother of Marxism.
” – Le Droit de Vivre , May 12 , 1936 “ Judaism is Marxism , communism ” – Harry Waton , A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites ( New York : Committee for the Preservation of the Jews , 1939 ) , p. 64 “ The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.
” – Harry Waton , A Program for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( New York : Committee for the Preservation of the Jews , 1939 ) , p. 143 “ We Jews can not be called upon to denounce Communism.
” – The American Hebrew ( New York ) , February 3 , 1939 , p. 11 “ It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.
” -Leon Dennen , in The Menorah Journal ( New York ) July-September 1932 , p. 106 “ That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking , of Jewish discontent , of Jewish effort to reconstruct.
” – The American Hebrew , September 10 , 1920 “ The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism ” -Dr. Oscar Levy , in George Pitt-Rivers , The World Significance of the Russian Revolution ( Oxford , 1920 ) , p. ix “ The Jews [ have been ] furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders ” -The Jewish World ( London ) , April 16 , 1919 , p. 11 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ part in the Bolshevist movement ” -The American Hebrew ( New York ) , November 18 , 1927 , p. 20 “ Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.
” -Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky , in The Menorah Journal ( New York ) , July 1928 , p. 37 “ Among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race….Trotsky ( Russia ) , Bela Kun ( Hungary ) , Rosa Luxemburg ( Germany ) , and Emma Goldman ( United States ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development , of envious malevolence and impossible equality , has been steady growing….with the exception of Lenin , the majority of leading figures are Jews.
” – Winston Churchill in Illustrated Sunday Herald , February 8 , 1920 Here Vladimir Putin explains that 80-85 % of Bolsheviks were Jewish .
Indeed , beyond the capture of Russia , these Jewish hostile elites either briefly seized control or held regional power in countries like Hungary and Germany from 1919 to 1920 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 78 % of its members were Jewish in the 1920s .
Between March and August 1919 , Bolsheviks under Bela Kuhn ( aka Moritz Cohen ) managed to take over in Hungary and murdered tens of thousands people before Admiral Miklos Horthy ( labelled a “ fascist ” ) with the aid of Romania threw them off .
More details about Red Terror can be scrutinized here .
Red Terror in Russia was largely carried out by the Cheka and its successor , the NKVD .
The Cheka published it ’ s kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In 1918-19 the toll was 1.7 million .
According to official Soviet report from 1922 , 1,695,904 were exterminated between January , 1921 and April , 1922 .
Many were charged with “ anti-social thinking.
” The Bolsheviks set up a whole cottage gaslighting industry around this accusation .
The requisition of food terror associated with the Bolshevik Cheka resulted in a major famine in 1921-1923 .
The New York Slimes reporter Walter Duranty engaged in a massive cover up of these crimes .
Who exactly were these executioners ?
Immediately after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government .
Lenin ’ s first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins .
Under Lenin , Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution , including its dirtiest work .
Despite the Communists ’ vows to eradicate anti-Semitism , it spread rapidly after the Revolution — partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration , as well as in the traumatic , inhuman Sovietization drives that followed .
Historian Salo Baron has noted that an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new Bolshevik secret police , the Cheka .
Many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators .
The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin ’ s dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev , a loquacious , mean-spirited , curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds .
Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro wrote , “ Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with , and possibly shot by , a Jewish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American professor of Russian history , writes that in Ukraine , “ Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents.
” This bloody period wound down in 1937 , when Stalin ordered , “ Clean out the synagogue ” , and then purged and executed numerous Jewish operatives .
Of course , the 1937-1938 purges are well covered by historians but never within its context .
However as WW II approached Jews made a major come back as a source of stiff resistance to the Axis attack .
In 1941 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Baltic States , those peoples conducted payback on the Jewish population without the Germans so much as lifting a finger : Above is an example of the Chekas ’ “ Red Terror ” garb : brown leather coats or butcher aprons with leather boots , suitable for cleaning off and wiping up blood .
These goons used knifes and revolvers on their victims .
They also loved to torture and rape .
The taking of hostages was common .
The last vision in life for millions was being confronted by a monster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only were millions of ethnic Russians victimized , but the blame for these crimes was solely pinned on them .
An example of the graphic killing operation is shown below in a clip from the 1992 Russian film The Chekist .
”

“To overcome our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia’s population. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.” — Grigory Zinoviev (aka Hirsch Apfelbaum), 1918
With the latest series of events involving police yokelism and the false Hegelian race and political dialectic, we must remember that one of the agendas of the Crime Syndicate is to bring police under centralized, national control. They do this by making local law enforcement look like bumpkins, not up to the job. This would be akin to the Soviet Cheka running all police. This will be unmitigated hell.
For some curious reason, Hollywood and the media scarcely pays the slightest attention to the history of the Bolshevik Red Terror. You won’t get much of the story on History Channel either. One would never guess that 40 million ethnic Russians and Ukrainians were murdered by thugs and goons over two decades starting in 1918.
This is suppressed and hidden history, but it goes along way toward explaining the 1920s so-called Fascist or Nationalist counter-reaction and widespread “anti-semitism” throughout Europe. The destabilized populations of Europe post WWI were naturally terrified of Trotskyite (Leon Trotsky, aka Lev Davidovich Bronstein) red terrorists. Bolshevism, Red Terror and Judaism were conflated as the same thing in most Europeans’ minds of the post WW I era.
“Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.”– Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935
“The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”– The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250
“Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”– Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936
“Judaism is Marxism, communism” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64
“The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143
“We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.” – The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11
“It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.” -Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106
“That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.” – The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920
“The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism” -Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix
“The Jews [have been] furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders” -The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11
“Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement” -The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20
“Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.” -Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37
“Among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race….Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany ), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steady growing….with the exception of Lenin, the majority of leading figures are Jews.” – Winston Churchill in Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920
Here Vladimir Putin explains that 80-85% of Bolsheviks were Jewish.
Indeed, beyond the capture of Russia, these Jewish hostile elites either briefly seized control or held regional power in countries like Hungary and Germany from 1919 to 1920.
Among Germany’s Communist Party, 78% of its members were Jewish in the 1920s. Between March and August 1919, Bolsheviks under Bela Kuhn (aka Moritz Cohen) managed to take over in Hungary and murdered tens of thousands people before Admiral Miklos Horthy (labelled a “fascist”) with the aid of Romania threw them off. More details about Red Terror can be scrutinized here.
Red Terror in Russia was largely carried out by the Cheka and its successor, the NKVD. The Cheka published it’s kill list in it’s own publication. In 1918-19 the toll was 1.7 million. According to official Soviet report from 1922, 1,695,904 were exterminated between January, 1921 and April, 1922. Many were charged with “anti-social thinking.” The Bolsheviks set up a whole cottage gaslighting industry around this accusation.
The requisition of food terror associated with the Bolshevik Cheka resulted in a major famine in 1921-1923.
The New York Slimes reporter Walter Duranty engaged in a massive cover up of these crimes.
Who exactly were these executioners?
Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:
Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin’s first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins. Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists’ vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution — partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka. Many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators. The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin’s dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds.
Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro wrote, “Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator.”
W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history, writes that in Ukraine, “Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents.”
This bloody period wound down in 1937, when Stalin ordered, “Clean out the synagogue”, and then purged and executed numerous Jewish operatives. Of course, the 1937-1938 purges are well covered by historians but never within its context. However as WW II approached Jews made a major come back as a source of stiff resistance to the Axis attack. In 1941, when Germany moved into Ukraine and the Baltic States, those peoples conducted payback on the Jewish population without the Germans so much as lifting a finger:
An official Report of the Reich Security Main Office documented the Lvov massacre as follows: ‘During the first hours after the departure of the Bolshevik Army, the Ukrainian population took praiseworthy action against the Jews … About 7,000 Jews were seized and shot by the Ukrainian police in retribution for inhuman acts of cruelty [at Brygidki and the other prisons] …” (dated 16 July 1941
Above is an example of the Chekas’ “Red Terror” garb: brown leather coats or butcher aprons with leather boots, suitable for cleaning off and wiping up blood. These goons used knifes and revolvers on their victims. They also loved to torture and rape. The taking of hostages was common.
The last vision in life for millions was being confronted by a monster dressed in this lovely outfit. Not only were millions of ethnic Russians victimized, but the blame for these crimes was solely pinned on them.
An example of the graphic killing operation is shown below in a clip from the 1992 Russian film The Chekist.”


russia-insider--2020-05-05--Influential Neocon, Jewish-Funded Think Tanks Are Using COVID To Push War with Iran (AEI, FDD)

Amid an unprecedented global crisis , the self-declared “ guardians of order ” see an opening to push for more war , death and destruction .
Since the global Covid-19 pandemic began , a cluster of U.S. think tanks has been aggressively lobbying the Trump administration to escalate militarily toward Iran and tighten U.S. sanctions .
This push has come despite warnings that such sanctions are worsening the death toll of Iran ’ s outbreak , which is one of the worst in the world .
The think tanks leading this effort—the Foundation for Defense of Democracies ( FDD ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ —have cranked out non-stop statements , research documents , videos and media appearances since the crisis began .
They are not shouting into the wind , but speaking directly to an administration that has proven willing to act upon their words .
In the 47 days since March 11 , when the World Health Organization declared Covid-19 a global pandemic , the FDD has posted 56 articles , podcast interviews and videos on its website which either demonize Iran as a uniquely bad actor or urge the United States to take a confrontational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ steady stream of anti-Iran invectives is not new , the insistence that the Covid-19 crisis builds their case is .
One piece from April 14 , for example , argues that the crisis strengthens the case for “ regime change , ” because it will diminish “ the regime ’ s credibility even further and add fuel to the outrage and anger that have been building for years.
” The unproven theory that mass suffering will accelerate an uprising against the government has long been used to justify a host of punishing U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sanctions—a form of collective punishment has only unleashed poverty and premature death upon ordinary people .
Yet , throughout the crisis , the FDD has published a flurry of materials arguing that the United States must not let up sanctions during the pandemic .
The organization is funded by pro-Israel billionaires and started out in 2001 as an explicitly pro-Israel organization called EMET ( Hebrew for truth ) .
Since the pandemic began , it has published written and video posts that include : “ Tehran Can Afford to Fight Covid-19 Even Without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Is Absolutely No Excuse To Lift Sanctions on Iran ” and “ Humanitarian channels to Iran continue to be wide open.
” In a March 27 video , Mark Dubowitz , the chief executive of FDD , released a video arguing that “ the Iranian people know that this is the wrong time to give sanctions relief.
” In fact , doctors in Iran have been begging the Trump administration for relief from sanctions , which are cutting off critical medical supplies , like ventilators , leading to an increase in Covid-19 deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paper , they are rendered largely meaningless by a difficult-to-navigate web of sanctions , as well as threats and intimidation from the Trump administration , which have scared global banks and firms from doing business with Iran .
Researchers were warning that sanctions were causing a shortage in medical supplies before the outbreak began : As Human Rights Watch said on April 6 , “ these exemptions have failed to offset the strong reluctance of U.S. and European companies and banks to risk incurring sanctions and legal action by exporting or financing exempted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Iranian-American community organizer with the No War Campaign , told In These Times that the FDD ’ s role is “ wildly ruinous—there 's no nicer way to put it.
” According to Katebi , “ You 'd think a humanitarian crisis would be a time when war hawks pause rather than ramp up their project .
It is telling what their goal is .
With all their talk about wanting to help the Iranain people , it ’ s very clear it 's quite the contrary.
” Amid calls for sanctions relief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in more , with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issuing a statement on March 18 announcing a new round of sanctions that “ will deprive the regime of critical income from its petrochemical industry and further Iran ’ s economic and diplomatic isolation.
” This was soon followed by the Trump administration ’ s intervention to block an emergency $ 5 billion loan to Iran from the International Monetary Fund ( a position the FDD also supported ) .
But this did not satisfy the FDD .
On April 23 , a group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signed a letter to Trump urging his administration to “ double down on the maximum pressure campaign.
” Of the 50 people who signed , 22 were from the FDD , according to a report in the conservative publication The National Interest .
Cavan Kharrazian , international program researcher for the Center for Economic and Policy Research , told In These Times , “ Their letter echoes the State Department 's categorically false line that these broad economic sanctions have no humanitarian effects .
Despite claiming that their ‘ hearts go out ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contribute to an extremely dangerous foreign policy that harms millions of ordinary Iranians and pushes us closer to escalating military conflict.
” This danger is underscored by Trump ’ s April 22 claim that , “ I have instructed the United States Navy to shoot down and destroy any and all Iranian gunboats if they harass our ships at sea ” —a reference to the U.S. Navy 's Fifth Fleet in the Persian Gulf .
One of the signatories is the FDD ’ s senior advisor Richard Goldberg , who worked in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was also at the FDD .
When serving as Trump ’ s national security advisor , John Bolton created a job just for Goldberg : “ director for countering Iran ’ s weapons of mass destruction.
” As Bloomberg reports , “ The goal was to counter what Bolton saw as a desire at the departments of State and Treasury to weaken the ‘ maximum pressure ’ campaign against Iran.
” While Goldberg served on the National Security Council , he remained on the salary of the FDD .
Goldberg ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a close relationship between the FDD and the Trump administration .
When Iran declared in August 2019 that it was imposing sanctions on the FDD and Dubowitz for “ unilateral and illegal economic terrorism , ” Pompeo came to the think tank ’ s defense .
“ The U.S. does not take these threats lightly , and will hold the regime and its ‘ apparatuses ’ to account , ” he tweeted .
On April 17 , Juan Zarate , Chairman of the FDD ’ s “ Center on Economic and Financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , organized by the Center for a New American Security ( CNAS ) , alongside Andrea Gacki , director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control for the U.S. Department of the Treasury , where he argued in favor of U.S. sanctions .
Among the FDD ’ s biggest funders is billionaire and Home Depot co-founder Bernard Marcus , who was one of Trump ’ s largest donors in 2016 and has been clear about his fervent belief that “ Iran is the devil , ” as Eli Clifton reported .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public opinion , FDD CEO Mark Dubowitz is continually quoted in major publication pieces on Iran , such as the New York Times , and FDD staff members routinely host or sit on panels throughout the beltway regarding Iran .
Additionally , their 'experts ' have regularly testified in Congress on foreign policy towards Iran.
” But perhaps the clearest sign of influence is how closely the Trump administration ’ s rhetoric mirrors that of the FDD .
On April 6 , the State Department published a fact sheet titled “ Iran 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ screedy document is worth comparing with an FDD memo published the day before : the overlap in messaging , historical examples , and specific data cited is striking .
As Kharrazian notes , this is not an isolated case : “ If you read the statements coming from Trump 's State Department on Iran and the 'maximum pressure ' campaign , they appear almost completely ideologically aligned with these think-tanks ' own positions and talking points , especially during the Covid-19 crisis.
” FDD is not alone in its campaign .
The AEI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foundations , as well as corporations such as ExxonMobil , has launched a campaign to counter activists who are calling for sanctions relief .
Yasmine Taeb , senior policy counsel at Demand Progress , tells In These Times , “ FDD and AEI have always pushed for policies aimed at war .
FDD led the charge against the Iran nuclear deal under Obama , and it opposes U.S. diplomacy with Iran on principle : It sees any U.S. relationship with Iran as coming at the expense of the U.S. relationship with Israel , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporting escalation for the sake of escalation.
” “ The difference between the FDD and AEI today is that the AEI is a prominent conservative organization that supported Bush ’ s march to war in Iraq in 2003 , ” she continues .
“ It is not leading the charge for war with Iran today : The FDD is playing the role that the AEI played in the lead-up to the Iraq War.
” Notably , AEI ’ s board of trustees includes former Vice President Dick Cheney alongside and a number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , former CEO and chairman of Motorola .
While the AEI might not be playing as large a role as the FDD , it also is not silent .
On March 20 , 26 progressive organizations released a statement asking “ President Trump , Sec .
Mnuchin , and Sec .
Pompeo to loosen the administration 's crippling sanctions regime on Iran for 120 days in order to aid the Iranian people ’ s fight against the virus.
” AEI responded with a press effort to oppose that effort .
On March 24 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blasted the letter in an op-ed in the Washington Examiner titled , “ Don ’ t lift Iran sanctions , not even for the coronavirus.
” Then , on March 25 , AEI senior fellow Danielle Pletka wrote an op-ed in The Dispatch titled , “ Sorry , now is not the time to lift sanctions on Iran.
” That piece also responds to the letter from 26 organizations calling for sanctions to be lifted .
In late March , Sen. Bernie Sanders , Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar and others circulated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Iran ( that letter would be publicly released on March 31 with 34 congressional signatures ) .
On March 25 , Rubin wrote an article for The National Interest titled “ Sorry , AOC : Donald Trump can ’ t give Iran a sanctions pass for coronavirus.
” Nahid Soltanzadeh is a digital campaigner for the Muslim grassroots organization MPower Change , which is part of the # EndCOVIDSanctions coalition that released a March 31 letter applauding those members of Congress who spoke out against U.S. sanctions .
They said that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to increase sanctions “ is enraging and only enables the Office of Foreign Assets Control to continue letting Iranians die from Covid-19.
” Soltanzadeh underscored , “ They create an environment where OFAC can escape accountability to the U.S. public or Congress—both of which are overwhelmingly demanding a temporary lift on Iran sanctions.
” Katebi says the AEI ’ s campaign is a sign of the effectiveness of sanctions opponents : “ For them to be going so strong , it 's only because they 're seeing the work and impact we 've @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FDD , AEI ’ s support for sanctions stems from a larger push towards military escalation .
On April 10 , Gary Schmitt , “ resident scholar in strategic studies and American institutions ” for AEI , wrote a piece in The American Interest titled , “ Don ’ t slash the defense budget to pay for Covid-19.
” He argued that any cuts would pose a security threat to the United States , in part because “ Russia , China , and Iran have become more aggressive and more potent adversaries.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pollack , a resident scholar at AEI , echoed FDD in speculating on whether the mass suffering caused by Covid-19 could hasten the regime ’ s end : “ While Covid-19 seems unlikely to be the trigger for the fall of the Islamic Republic , when the regime ’ s history is finally written , it may very well be that we will look back on this crisis and say that it helped hasten its end.
” Notably , Pollack was a major pusher of the Iraq war , who was cited by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a reason the latter supported that war .
Meanwhile , some at AEI are making the case that “ bad actors ” like Iran will try to take advantage of the crisis , so the United States should too .
Hal Brands , resident scholar for AEI , wrote an article for Bloomberg opinion on April 20 titled , “ The world ’ s bad actors see coronavirus as an opportunity.
” He wrote , “ There will always be predatory actors looking to exploit weakness and disorder , even if that disorder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guardians of order are absent , the balance will be broken , and the results will not be pretty.
” Amid an unprecedented global crisis , the self-declared “ guardians of order ” see an opening to push for more war , death and destruction .
In the words of Taeb from Demand Progress , “ It 's pretty disgusting , because we 're talking about a global pandemic that has claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people .
We 're talking about innocent people dying.
” Ambi Colón Nuñez and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Sarah Lazare is web editor at In These Times .
She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept , The Nation , and Tom Dispatch .
She tweets at @ sarahlazare .

(L-R) Heather Conley ofCenter for Strategic and International Studies; Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia; Steven Hall, former U.S. CIA chief of Russia operations; and Eric Lorber, director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, testify during a House Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on March 28, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Amid an unprecedented global crisis, the self-declared “guardians of order” see an opening to push for more war, death and destruction.
Since the global Covid-19 pandemic began, a cluster of U.S. think tanks has been aggressively lobbying the Trump administration to escalate militarily toward Iran and tighten U.S. sanctions. This push has come despite warnings that such sanctions are worsening the death toll of Iran’s outbreak, which is one of the worst in the world. The think tanks leading this effort—the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) and American Enterprise Institute (AEI)—have cranked out non-stop statements, research documents, videos and media appearances since the crisis began. They are not shouting into the wind, but speaking directly to an administration that has proven willing to act upon their words.
In the 47 days since March 11, when the World Health Organization declared Covid-19 a global pandemic, the FDD has posted 56 articles, podcast interviews and videos on its website which either demonize Iran as a uniquely bad actor or urge the United States to take a confrontational posture towards the country. While the steady stream of anti-Iran invectives is not new, the insistence that the Covid-19 crisis builds their case is. One piece from April 14, for example, argues that the crisis strengthens the case for “regime change,” because it will diminish “the regime’s credibility even further and add fuel to the outrage and anger that have been building for years.” The unproven theory that mass suffering will accelerate an uprising against the government has long been used to justify a host of punishing U.S. policies against the Iranian people, including sanctions—a form of collective punishment has only unleashed poverty and premature death upon ordinary people.
Yet, throughout the crisis, the FDD has published a flurry of materials arguing that the United States must not let up sanctions during the pandemic. The organization is funded by pro-Israel billionaires and started out in 2001 as an explicitly pro-Israel organization called EMET (Hebrew for truth). Since the pandemic began, it has published written and video posts that include: “Tehran Can Afford to Fight Covid-19 Even Without Sanctions Relief,” “The Coronavirus Is Absolutely No Excuse To Lift Sanctions on Iran” and “Humanitarian channels to Iran continue to be wide open.” In a March 27 video, Mark Dubowitz, the chief executive of FDD, released a video arguing that “the Iranian people know that this is the wrong time to give sanctions relief.”
In fact, doctors in Iran have been begging the Trump administration for relief from sanctions, which are cutting off critical medical supplies, like ventilators, leading to an increase in Covid-19 deaths. While humanitarian exemptions technically exist on paper, they are rendered largely meaningless by a difficult-to-navigate web of sanctions, as well as threats and intimidation from the Trump administration, which have scared global banks and firms from doing business with Iran. Researchers were warning that sanctions were causing a shortage in medical supplies before the outbreak began: As Human Rights Watch said on April 6, “these exemptions have failed to offset the strong reluctance of U.S. and European companies and banks to risk incurring sanctions and legal action by exporting or financing exempted humanitarian goods.”
Hoda Katebi, an Iranian-American community organizer with the No War Campaign, told In These Times that the FDD’s role is “wildly ruinous—there's no nicer way to put it.” According to Katebi, “You'd think a humanitarian crisis would be a time when war hawks pause rather than ramp up their project. It is telling what their goal is. With all their talk about wanting to help the Iranain people, it’s very clear it's quite the contrary.”
Amid calls for sanctions relief, the Trump administration has only dug in more, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issuing a statement on March 18 announcing a new round of sanctions that “will deprive the regime of critical income from its petrochemical industry and further Iran’s economic and diplomatic isolation.” This was soon followed by the Trump administration’s intervention to block an emergency $5 billion loan to Iran from the International Monetary Fund (a position the FDD also supported). But this did not satisfy the FDD. On April 23, a group of “experts and formal officials” signed a letter to Trump urging his administration to “double down on the maximum pressure campaign.” Of the 50 people who signed, 22 were from the FDD, according to a report in the conservative publication The National Interest.
Cavan Kharrazian, international program researcher for the Center for Economic and Policy Research, told In These Times, “Their letter echoes the State Department's categorically false line that these broad economic sanctions have no humanitarian effects. Despite claiming that their ‘hearts go out’ to the Iranian people, they actively contribute to an extremely dangerous foreign policy that harms millions of ordinary Iranians and pushes us closer to escalating military conflict.” This danger is underscored by Trump’s April 22 claim that, “I have instructed the United States Navy to shoot down and destroy any and all Iranian gunboats if they harass our ships at sea”—a reference to the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet in the Persian Gulf.
One of the signatories is the FDD’s senior advisor Richard Goldberg, who worked in the Trump administration from 2019 to 2020 while he was also at the FDD. When serving as Trump’s national security advisor, John Bolton created a job just for Goldberg: “director for countering Iran’s weapons of mass destruction.” As Bloomberg reports, “The goal was to counter what Bolton saw as a desire at the departments of State and Treasury to weaken the ‘maximum pressure’ campaign against Iran.” While Goldberg served on the National Security Council, he remained on the salary of the FDD.
Goldberg’s double role is not the only evidence of a close relationship between the FDD and the Trump administration. When Iran declared in August 2019 that it was imposing sanctions on the FDD and Dubowitz for “unilateral and illegal economic terrorism,” Pompeo came to the think tank’s defense. “The U.S. does not take these threats lightly, and will hold the regime and its ‘apparatuses’ to account,” he tweeted. On April 17, Juan Zarate, Chairman of the FDD’s “Center on Economic and Financial Power,” appeared on a roundtable, organized by the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), alongside Andrea Gacki, director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, where he argued in favor of U.S. sanctions. Among the FDD’s biggest funders is billionaire and Home Depot co-founder Bernard Marcus, who was one of Trump’s largest donors in 2016 and has been clear about his fervent belief that “Iran is the devil,” as Eli Clifton reported.
According to Kharrazian, “In the realm of public opinion, FDD CEO Mark Dubowitz is continually quoted in major publication pieces on Iran, such as the New York Times, and FDD staff members routinely host or sit on panels throughout the beltway regarding Iran. Additionally, their 'experts' have regularly testified in Congress on foreign policy towards Iran.”
But perhaps the clearest sign of influence is how closely the Trump administration’s rhetoric mirrors that of the FDD. On April 6, the State Department published a fact sheet titled “Iran's Sanctions Relief Scam.” This bizarre, screedy document is worth comparing with an FDD memo published the day before: the overlap in messaging, historical examples, and specific data cited is striking. As Kharrazian notes, this is not an isolated case: “If you read the statements coming from Trump's State Department on Iran and the 'maximum pressure' campaign, they appear almost completely ideologically aligned with these think-tanks' own positions and talking points, especially during the Covid-19 crisis.”
FDD is not alone in its campaign. The AEI, which has received millions from Koch foundations, as well as corporations such as ExxonMobil, has launched a campaign to counter activists who are calling for sanctions relief. Yasmine Taeb, senior policy counsel at Demand Progress, tells In These Times, “FDD and AEI have always pushed for policies aimed at war. FDD led the charge against the Iran nuclear deal under Obama, and it opposes U.S. diplomacy with Iran on principle: It sees any U.S. relationship with Iran as coming at the expense of the U.S. relationship with Israel, and it has a track record of supporting escalation for the sake of escalation.”
“The difference between the FDD and AEI today is that the AEI is a prominent conservative organization that supported Bush’s march to war in Iraq in 2003,” she continues. “It is not leading the charge for war with Iran today: The FDD is playing the role that the AEI played in the lead-up to the Iraq War.” Notably, AEI’s board of trustees includes former Vice President Dick Cheney alongside and a number of corporate leaders, including Christopher B. Galvin, former CEO and chairman of Motorola.
While the AEI might not be playing as large a role as the FDD, it also is not silent. On March 20, 26 progressive organizations released a statement asking “President Trump, Sec. Mnuchin, and Sec. Pompeo to loosen the administration's crippling sanctions regime on Iran for 120 days in order to aid the Iranian people’s fight against the virus.” AEI responded with a press effort to oppose that effort. On March 24, AEI resident scholar Michael Rubin directly blasted the letter in an op-ed in the Washington Examiner titled, “Don’t lift Iran sanctions, not even for the coronavirus.”
Then, on March 25, AEI senior fellow Danielle Pletka wrote an op-ed in The Dispatch titled, “Sorry, now is not the time to lift sanctions on Iran.” That piece also responds to the letter from 26 organizations calling for sanctions to be lifted. In late March, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar and others circulated a letter calling for immediate sanctions relief for Iran (that letter would be publicly released on March 31 with 34 congressional signatures). On March 25, Rubin wrote an article for The National Interest titled “Sorry, AOC: Donald Trump can’t give Iran a sanctions pass for coronavirus.”
Nahid Soltanzadeh is a digital campaigner for the Muslim grassroots organization MPower Change, which is part of the #EndCOVIDSanctions coalition that released a March 31 letter applauding those members of Congress who spoke out against U.S. sanctions. They said that the push by both the AEI and FDD to increase sanctions “is enraging and only enables the Office of Foreign Assets Control to continue letting Iranians die from Covid-19.” Soltanzadeh underscored, “They create an environment where OFAC can escape accountability to the U.S. public or Congress—both of which are overwhelmingly demanding a temporary lift on Iran sanctions.”
Katebi says the AEI’s campaign is a sign of the effectiveness of sanctions opponents: “For them to be going so strong, it's only because they're seeing the work and impact we've been having as a campaign.”
Like the FDD, AEI’s support for sanctions stems from a larger push towards military escalation. On April 10, Gary Schmitt, “resident scholar in strategic studies and American institutions” for AEI, wrote a piece in The American Interest titled, “Don’t slash the defense budget to pay for Covid-19.” He argued that any cuts would pose a security threat to the United States, in part because “Russia, China, and Iran have become more aggressive and more potent adversaries.” On April 2, Kenneth M. Pollack, a resident scholar at AEI, echoed FDD in speculating on whether the mass suffering caused by Covid-19 could hasten the regime’s end: “While Covid-19 seems unlikely to be the trigger for the fall of the Islamic Republic, when the regime’s history is finally written, it may very well be that we will look back on this crisis and say that it helped hasten its end.” Notably, Pollack was a major pusher of the Iraq war, who was cited by New York Times columnist Bill Keller as a reason the latter supported that war.
Meanwhile, some at AEI are making the case that “bad actors” like Iran will try to take advantage of the crisis, so the United States should too. Hal Brands, resident scholar for AEI, wrote an article for Bloomberg opinion on April 20 titled, “The world’s bad actors see coronavirus as an opportunity.” He wrote, “There will always be predatory actors looking to exploit weakness and disorder, even if that disorder affects them as well. If the guardians of order are absent, the balance will be broken, and the results will not be pretty.”
Amid an unprecedented global crisis, the self-declared “guardians of order” see an opening to push for more war, death and destruction. In the words of Taeb from Demand Progress, “It's pretty disgusting, because we're talking about a global pandemic that has claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. We're talking about innocent people dying.”
Ambi Colón Nuñez and Juan Caicedo contributed research to this report.
Sarah Lazare is web editor at In These Times. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch. She tweets at @sarahlazare.


russia-insider--2020-05-05--Moscow's Wealthiest Suburb, a Graveyard of Ridiculous, Tacky, Decaying Mansions No One Wants To Buy

Moscow's Wealthiest Suburb, a Graveyard of Ridiculous, Tacky, Decaying Mansions No One Wants To Buy (Russian TV News)

Moscow 's richest neighborhood of Rublyovka used to be the haunt of the new billionaire class .
Now its a hopeless hodgepodge of disastrous mega-mansions that are falling apart , a complete disaster .
Rubylovka - there is no such territorial unit on the map of the capital region ( Moscow ) , but the fame of this piece of land near Moscow is far beyond the country 's borders .
Back in the early 2000 's , one of the estates on Rubylovka was one of the five most expensive houses in the world .
And this , of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of those they are vainly trying to sell today .
One of the houses was put up , according to the criteria of Rubylovka , at a bargain price : 1.5 thousand square meters are sold for 1 billion , 200 million rubles ( 1.6 million dollars ) .
In addition , all bronze deer , bears , crystal candelabra , expensive furniture , and even Rolls-Royce are included , just pick them up .
But there is no buyer - the house is outdated morally and physically .
`` Now it 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economical .
The area is usually 500 - 700 square meters .
If the house has four bedrooms , then it needs at least three bathrooms , but earlier , in older houses , there was only one.
`` According to real estate agents , almost 80 % of housing near the Rublevo-Uspensky highway does not meet modern requirements .
Designers can not define the style of many houses ; their architectural designs are absurd .
This house is also for sale , it occupies the entire plot of land .
`` This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is valued at half a million dollars .
From your backyard , you can only see sky and a fence . ''
Old-timers like Sergey remember Zhukovka when it was still a village , and in the place of the luxury-level shopping center , there was a post office , and next to it was a general store where they sold sprats in tomato sauce .
`` There was nothing , just quiet and peace . ''
`` What did they sell in the general store ? ''
`` Now you can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think you will not be able to find these products here . ''
Everything changed in the early 90 's when monumental buildings began to appear next to village houses and modest , by today 's standards , cottages of distinguished scientists .
Their construction was controlled by men of the strong physique with massive chains around their necks and in jackets of the color of bricks .
They were mainly inspired by low-class poetry that was easily understandable and for the malice of the day .
They stopped shooting .
Then the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They went abroad , they saw the Louvre and the Versailles .
The architect Amalia recalls the orders that came from those who wished to settle on Rubylovka .
`` They asked , for example , a copy of the Paris Rodin Museum , just a bit smaller .
Around 3 times smaller .
They are already fixed proportions !
We can not take it and squeeze it .
Why not ?
Let 's squeeze it and pull on this facade.
`` The architectural race began to be insane , as well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There were parties almost every day .
`` I was amazed when I was performing in one of the palaces , and there was a barman who had a pemanent job there .
That was the latest fashion trend . ''
Columns are a must , and one must have more than his neighbor .
An area of 5 thousand square meters was designed for a family of three .
Some rooms have not been visited for years .
The inhabitants of Rubylovka implemented their vision of beauty by enriching the building @ @ @ @ @ @ @ combined the incompatible .
`` Police could live next to some prominent bandits , and they were chasing each other , but not there ... '' Today , in this reservation for millionaires , a new trend is to collect money .
It is impossible to bring the estates built in the 90 's to new realities .
In addition , the buyer became interested in village fees and home maintenance .
`` Gas , electricity is a big expense .
No less than 2 cleaning ladies because one cleaning lady can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not realistic , you need to be a robot to do it.
`` It 's the same , neighbors living in compact homes , the inhabitant living for 17 years do not understand them .
`` I could n't live in such a 'box ' of a home .
Look at our copper roof , everything is copper , neighbors are jealous . ''
Land for construction is almost not allocated in a prestigious area near Moscow .
Rubylovka is built up with palaces , like Rio with favelas .
The discounts on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they reach up to 50 percent , only there are not buyers - it is too expensive to free the site from construction waste after breaking a luxurious and useless palace .
Thus , in the Rubylovka karaoke bar the main hit is like before Vladimirovsk central ( a famous song about jail time ) .

Moscow's richest neighborhood of Rublyovka used to be the haunt of the new billionaire class.
Now its a hopeless hodgepodge of disastrous mega-mansions that are falling apart, a complete disaster.
Transcript below.
Transcript:
Rubylovka - there is no such territorial unit on the map of the capital region (Moscow), but the fame of this piece of land near Moscow is far beyond the country's borders.
Back in the early 2000's, one of the estates on Rubylovka was one of the five most expensive houses in the world.
And this, of course, was a palace, one of those they are vainly trying to sell today.
One of the houses was put up, according to the criteria of Rubylovka, at a bargain price: 1.5 thousand square meters are sold for 1 billion, 200 million rubles (1.6 million dollars). In addition, all bronze deer, bears, crystal candelabra, expensive furniture, and even Rolls-Royce are included, just pick them up.
But there is no buyer - the house is outdated morally and physically.
"Now it's more about being practical, ergonomic, economical. The area is usually 500 - 700 square meters. If the house has four bedrooms, then it needs at least three bathrooms, but earlier, in older houses, there was only one. "
According to real estate agents, almost 80% of housing near the Rublevo-Uspensky highway does not meet modern requirements. Designers cannot define the style of many houses; their architectural designs are absurd.
This house is also for sale, it occupies the entire plot of land.
"This is also very strange for housing that is valued at half a million dollars. From your backyard, you can only see sky and a fence."
Old-timers like Sergey remember Zhukovka when it was still a village, and in the place of the luxury-level shopping center, there was a post office, and next to it was a general store where they sold sprats in tomato sauce.
"There was nothing, just quiet and peace."
"What did they sell in the general store?"
"Fish in tomato sauce, 'tourist breakfast', macaroni, caramel..."
"Now you cannot find the same?"
"I think you will not be able to find these products here."
Everything changed in the early 90's when monumental buildings began to appear next to village houses and modest, by today's standards, cottages of distinguished scientists. Their construction was controlled by men of the strong physique with massive chains around their necks and in jackets of the color of bricks. They were mainly inspired by low-class poetry that was easily understandable and for the malice of the day.
"Don't shoot each other..."
They stopped shooting. Then the 'rasberry jackets' remained only in folklore. They went abroad, they saw the Louvre and the Versailles.
The architect Amalia recalls the orders that came from those who wished to settle on Rubylovka.
"They asked, for example, a copy of the Paris Rodin Museum, just a bit smaller. Around 3 times smaller.
They are already fixed proportions! We cannot take it and squeeze it.
Why not? Let's squeeze it and pull on this facade. "
The architectural race began to be insane, as well as the fantasies of the new owners. There were parties almost every day.
"I was amazed when I was performing in one of the palaces, and there was a barman who had a pemanent job there. That was the latest fashion trend."
Columns are a must, and one must have more than his neighbor. An area of 5 thousand square meters was designed for a family of three. Some rooms have not been visited for years.
The inhabitants of Rubylovka implemented their vision of beauty by enriching the building materials market. This competition for luxury combined the incompatible.
"Police could live next to some prominent bandits, and they were chasing each other, but not there..."
Today, in this reservation for millionaires, a new trend is to collect money.
It is impossible to bring the estates built in the 90's to new realities. In addition, the buyer became interested in village fees and home maintenance.
Singer Alena Kravec doesn't give up on fashion.
"Gas, electricity is a big expense. No less than 2 cleaning ladies because one cleaning lady cannot manage to clean everything. It's not realistic, you need to be a robot to do it. "
It's the same, neighbors living in compact homes, the inhabitant living for 17 years do not understand them.
"I couldn't live in such a 'box' of a home. Look at our copper roof, everything is copper, neighbors are jealous."
Land for construction is almost not allocated in a prestigious area near Moscow. Rubylovka is built up with palaces, like Rio with favelas.
The discounts on the sale of estates are crazy, they reach up to 50 percent, only there are not buyers - it is too expensive to free the site from construction waste after breaking a luxurious and useless palace.
Thus, in the Rubylovka karaoke bar the main hit is like before Vladimirovsk central (a famous song about jail time).


russia-insider--2020-05-05--Israeli Historian Discovers '6 Million' Holocaust Figure Was Invented at Zionist Conference In 1944

Boston University 's director of the Elie Wiesel archive , Bar-Ilan University ’ s Institute of Holocaust Research historian Joel Rappel has discovered the origin of the infamous `` 6,000,000 '' number : a 1944 meeting of Zionist pioneering organizations in what is now known as the state of Israel .
For years , supporters of the Holocaust narrative have held that the number first appeared at the Nuremberg trials using highly discredited testimony by Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoss .
The 6,000,000 figure was again repeated by Adolf Eichmann , who was kidnapped by the Mossad and forced to participate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Israel .
According to documents in the Central Zionist Archive , the first mention of the 6 million claim was at a meeting of high ranking Zionist political figures in Palestine on January 19th , 1944 -- more than a year before the war in Europe ended and a census could be taken , and a year before the Red Army entered Auschwitz .
Rappel names Eliezer Unger , a Polish-Jew who helped lead the Hashomer Hadati religious Zionist youth organization , as the major figure in developing the count of Jews @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have escaped from his Polish ghetto through Eastern Europe .
After arriving in Palestine , he stated his intention `` to shock the entire world , all of humanity and our brothers the Children of Israel in particular.
” Unger had no evidence for what he was saying , but he did not believe Rabbi Stephen Wise 's assertions in the international media in 1943 of 2 million Jews being killed was making enough of an impact .
After Unger met with the Jewish groups and got them all on the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few days later that for the first time put the 6 million figure on the record , preceding German military leaders tortured into making confessions after the war .
It does n't appear that Unger mentioned anything about homicidal gas chambers .
The Haaretz article ends the revelation by quoting Eichmann 's chief prosecutor Gideon Hausner , who on the 6 million number stated : `` In the consciousness of the nation the number 6 million has become sanctified .
It ’ s not so simple to prove that .
We did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ document , but it became sanctified.
” In other words , it 's a lie .
After decades of killing , imprisoning , firebombing and bankrupting Holocaust revisionists , it seems that the Jewish community is now being forced to recalibrate their narrative and give more and more ground .
That they are now beginning to concede that the `` 6 million '' is nothing more than Zionist propaganda is a major blow to the myth .

Boston University's director of the Elie Wiesel archive, Bar-Ilan University’s Institute of Holocaust Research historian Joel Rappel has discovered the origin of the infamous "6,000,000" number: a 1944 meeting of Zionist pioneering organizations in what is now known as the state of Israel.
For years, supporters of the Holocaust narrative have held that the number first appeared at the Nuremberg trials using highly discredited testimony by Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoss. The 6,000,000 figure was again repeated by Adolf Eichmann, who was kidnapped by the Mossad and forced to participate in an internationally televised 1962 show trial in Israel.
According to documents in the Central Zionist Archive, the first mention of the 6 million claim was at a meeting of high ranking Zionist political figures in Palestine on January 19th, 1944 -- more than a year before the war in Europe ended and a census could be taken, and a year before the Red Army entered Auschwitz.
Rappel names Eliezer Unger, a Polish-Jew who helped lead the Hashomer Hadati religious Zionist youth organization, as the major figure in developing the count of Jews killed by the Nazis. Unger claimed to have escaped from his Polish ghetto through Eastern Europe. After arriving in Palestine, he stated his intention "to shock the entire world, all of humanity and our brothers the Children of Israel in particular.” Unger had no evidence for what he was saying, but he did not believe Rabbi Stephen Wise's assertions in the international media in 1943 of 2 million Jews being killed was making enough of an impact.
After Unger met with the Jewish groups and got them all on the same page, Haaretz published a small article a few days later that for the first time put the 6 million figure on the record, preceding German military leaders tortured into making confessions after the war. It doesn't appear that Unger mentioned anything about homicidal gas chambers.
The Haaretz article ends the revelation by quoting Eichmann's chief prosecutor Gideon Hausner, who on the 6 million number stated: "In the consciousness of the nation the number 6 million has become sanctified. It’s not so simple to prove that. We did not use this number in any official document, but it became sanctified.” In other words, it's a lie.
After decades of killing, imprisoning, firebombing and bankrupting Holocaust revisionists, it seems that the Jewish community is now being forced to recalibrate their narrative and give more and more ground. That they are now beginning to concede that the "6 million" is nothing more than Zionist propaganda is a major blow to the myth.


russia-insider--2020-05-05--Obnoxious BBC Smart-Ass Spouts Neocon Gibberish at China's UK Ambassador, Who Hits Back Hard (Hardta

Obnoxious BBC Smart-Ass Spouts Neocon Gibberish at China's UK Ambassador, Who Hits Back Hard (Hardtalk Interview)

If you want to understand why Chinese ( and by extension , Russian ) relations with countries who are dominated @ @ @ @ @ first and foremost the US and UK ) and their toadies in the media , @ @ @ @ @ you would do well to watch this 25 minute interview .
The media toadie in @ @ @ @ @ is hell bent on getting the wonderfully polite and tactful UK Ambassador , Liu Xiaoming @ @ @ @ @ is guilty , guilty , guilty , and had better pay for its evil crimes @ @ @ @ @ in the process .
Liu holds his own .
Entertaining TV .

× Disabling adblock
Disabling adblock for a specific site just takes a couple of clicks.
Usually it is as simple as clicking on the adblock icon in your browser, and choosing the ‘disable on this page or domain’ option.
If that doesn’t work this wikihow article gives more detail: https://www.wikihow.com/Disable-AdBlock
Thank you for your support!


russia-insider--2020-05-06--The Suppressed History of Jewish Red Terror in Europe and Russia After WW1


russia-insider--2020-05-06--Israeli Historian Discovers '6 Million' Holocaust Figure Was Invented at Zionist Conference In 1944