consciouslifenews--2020-11-17--Wig Or Weave? Which Is Better For You?

Wig Or Weave? Which Is Better For You?

If you are the type of girl who doesn ’ t like to spend a lot of time making your hair every day , then using a hair extension is a good idea .
The extensions help make your hair look gorgeous , and whether it is a causal day outing or a special occasion , and a hair extension can never go wrong .
Hair extensions can help achieve the look you want , but many girls are curious about whether a wig or weave is better for them ?
In this article , we will guide you the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wearing a weave can help you to protect your hair from getting damaged .
You can change your hairstyle instantly and can make it long or short according to your desire .
100 % human hair weave give extra protection to your hair , and you don ’ t have to heat them using hair straightening tools .
They are also an excellent choice for all the girls who work out every day .
If you don ’ t apply weave carefully , then it can lead to hair loss .
People who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hair , so it is essential to learn how to do it the right way .
Weave can also cost you a lot of money as it is expensive .
They can also be hard to maintain , and you need to go through various procedures to protect and maintain your hair while wearing a weave .
If you use a hair weave made with inferior quality hair , it might get tangles with your hair and make your hair unnatural .
If you like to change your hairstyles and colors often , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choice .
You don ’ t have to sit in the salons for long hours to change your hair color .
Wearing a weave can also be a long commitment , so it is best to wear a wig instead of a weave if you like to change your hair color often .
Beautyforever best wigs are also easy to maintain , so if you want easy maintenance of your hair , then choosing a wig over a weave is a better choice for you .
Synthetic wigs are not long-lasting , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it will cost you a lot of money .
If your wig isn ’ t custom made , then it might look unnatural and unreal .
It is better to go for a custom wig , and customized wigs might be pretty expensive .
Wigs also might not be suitable to wear in the summer season .
How much does a wig cost ?
Hair wigs can be expensive , and if you are buying a high quality and natural-looking wig , it can cost you around $ 1000 to $ 4300 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ depend on the texture , length , and construction of the wig .
How much does a weave cost ?
If you want to buy a fantastic weave , it will cost you around $ 200 to $ 600 .
If you get it applied from a professional , it can cost you a little more money over the weave price .

If you are the type of girl who doesn’t like to spend a lot of time making your hair every day, then using a hair extension is a good idea. The extensions help make your hair look gorgeous, and whether it is a causal day outing or a special occasion, and a hair extension can never go wrong. Hair extensions can help achieve the look you want, but many girls are curious about whether a wig or weave is better for them? In this article, we will guide you the best about hair wigs and weaves.
Pros of wearing a weave
Wearing a weave can help you to protect your hair from getting damaged. You can change your hairstyle instantly and can make it long or short according to your desire. 100% human hair weave give extra protection to your hair, and you don’t have to heat them using hair straightening tools. They are also an excellent choice for all the girls who work out every day.
Cons of wearing a weave
If you don’t apply weave carefully, then it can lead to hair loss. People who tightly braid their hair can damage your hair, so it is essential to learn how to do it the right way. Weave can also cost you a lot of money as it is expensive. They can also be hard to maintain, and you need to go through various procedures to protect and maintain your hair while wearing a weave. If you use a hair weave made with inferior quality hair, it might get tangles with your hair and make your hair unnatural.
Pros of wearing a wig
If you like to change your hairstyles and colors often, then wearing a wig is the best choice. You don’t have to sit in the salons for long hours to change your hair color. Wearing a weave can also be a long commitment, so it is best to wear a wig instead of a weave if you like to change your hair color often. Beautyforever best wigs are also easy to maintain, so if you want easy maintenance of your hair, then choosing a wig over a weave is a better choice for you.
Cons of a wig
Synthetic wigs are not long-lasting, and if you buy a human hair wig, it will cost you a lot of money. If your wig isn’t custom made, then it might look unnatural and unreal. It is better to go for a custom wig, and customized wigs might be pretty expensive. Wigs also might not be suitable to wear in the summer season.
How much does a wig cost?
Hair wigs can be expensive, and if you are buying a high quality and natural-looking wig, it can cost you around $1000 to $4300. The price of the wig will depend on the texture, length, and construction of the wig.
How much does a weave cost?
If you want to buy a fantastic weave, it will cost you around $200 to $600. If you get it applied from a professional, it can cost you a little more money over the weave price.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-18--Foolproof Formula for Your Best Possible Life

FAIR USE NOTICE .
Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues , human rights , economic and political democracy , and issues of social justice .
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use ' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news reporting , teaching , scholarship , and research .
If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use ' ... you must obtain permission from the copyright owner .
And , if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed , let us know via the `` Contact Us '' link at the top of the site , and we will promptly remove it .
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for professional advice of any kind .
Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material .
Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms .
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors .
No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied .

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-18--Ichigo Ichie: The Art of Living Every Moment

We wake up with thoughts of the past or the future .
We are busy coping with yesterday ’ s stuff while preparing for tomorrow .
But when do we make time for today ?
Well , the Japanese people have the philosophy of Ichigo Ichie .
It translates to “ once , a meeting ” and also “ at this moment , an opportunity .
This Japanese philosophy for a zen life explains to us the value of the present moment .
Every moment , every experience is unique , and once it slips away from us , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again .
So why not make the most of every moment while we are aware of it ?
Cultivating Ichigo Ichie is a great way to rejoice in every experience .
It tells us to pay attention to the present moment instead of worrying about the past or the future .
The greater your awareness of the present , the more fulfilled and happier you will feel .
Here are 10 principles of Ichigo Ichie that sum up the Japanese art of happiness : Don ’ t postpone your happiness .
While we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no two opportunities are the same .
Each moment is unique and deserves to be lived so as well .
Your life is a collection of these moments , so the more you can grab , the happier you will be !
Live each day to the fullest because you won ’ t be experiencing the same day twice .
Live each moment as it will happen only once in your life .
Ichigo Ichie makes you aware that each encounter is a unique opportunity , and the next one is not guaranteed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about your future or your past from time to time , dwelling on either of those is not going to help your present .
Accept that you can not change your past , you can only learn from it .
Acknowledge that worrying about the future won ’ t make it any better .
So why waste your precious present worrying about those ?
Only in the present do you have the gift of life , the gift of possibilities .
Anything can happen in this zen life !
4 .
Do something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same thing again and again won ’ t bring you different results .
Ichigo Ichie lets you make each moment unforgettable when you give yourself away .
Let something new and wonderful blossom within with each new experience .
Push aside all your worries as you seek happiness with meditation .
Sit down in a quiet place and simply observe life .
Every time you step away from the hustle and bustle of life , you give your mind and body a chance to breathe in and relax .
And that is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural senses of touch , sight , hearing , smell , and taste allows us to better experience the richness of perception .
The more aware you are , the more you focus on positivity .
The more mindful you are , the more you notice how other people react .
And that lets you be more empathic .
7 .
Are they all coincidences ?
Like Master Oogway had said , there are no accidents .
There is only the present .
So notice each coincidence around you .
What you feel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sign from the universe .
The invisible threads of reality are there to guide us in our daily lives , but first , we need to learn the signs .
Why do humans postpone their own happiness ?
When will we be happy in the present moment ?
Why will it take a planned holiday where you get to feel happiness only in a limited number of days ?
Appreciate life and all those you have in your life every day .
Stop waiting for special occasions- make every moment special .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tone of our lives .
One of the best gifts we have is the power of transformation .
We can change and evolve as many times as we want .
If you feel like your life is not aligned with the philosophy of Ichigo Ichie , what is stopping you from changing it all ?
Get up and bring the changes necessary !
Go out and hunt those special moments .
They won ’ t be presented to you on a platter .
The more you practice , the greater your joys @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to seek happiness .
Hector Garcia and Francesc Miralles ’ “ The Book of Ichigo Ichie , ” tells us how to master mindfulness and the art of happiness .
We get so busy at times that we even forget to breathe .
It reminds us to pause and appreciate the present .
Are you ready to make the most of your life ?

By Mayukh Saha | Truth Theory
We wake up with thoughts of the past or the future. We are busy coping with yesterday’s stuff while preparing for tomorrow. But when do we make time for today? Well, the Japanese people have the philosophy of Ichigo Ichie. It translates to “once, a meeting” and also “at this moment, an opportunity.
This Japanese philosophy for a zen life explains to us the value of the present moment. Every moment, every experience is unique, and once it slips away from us, we will never get to live that moment again. So why not make the most of every moment while we are aware of it?
Cultivating Ichigo Ichie is a great way to rejoice in every experience. It tells us to pay attention to the present moment instead of worrying about the past or the future. The greater your awareness of the present, the more fulfilled and happier you will feel.
Here are 10 principles of Ichigo Ichie that sum up the Japanese art of happiness:
1. Embrace every moment with Ichigo Ichie
Don’t postpone your happiness. While we have many opportunities throughout our lives, no two opportunities are the same. Each moment is unique and deserves to be lived so as well. Your life is a collection of these moments, so the more you can grab, the happier you will be!
2. Once in a lifetime
Live each day to the fullest because you won’t be experiencing the same day twice. Live each moment as it will happen only once in your life. Ichigo Ichie makes you aware that each encounter is a unique opportunity, and the next one is not guaranteed.
3. Live in the present
While it is alright to think about your future or your past from time to time, dwelling on either of those is not going to help your present. Accept that you cannot change your past, you can only learn from it. Acknowledge that worrying about the future won’t make it any better. So why waste your precious present worrying about those? Only in the present do you have the gift of life, the gift of possibilities. Anything can happen in this zen life!
4. Do something you have never done before
Doing the same thing again and again won’t bring you different results. Ichigo Ichie lets you make each moment unforgettable when you give yourself away. Let something new and wonderful blossom within with each new experience.
5. Seated meditation
Push aside all your worries as you seek happiness with meditation. Sit down in a quiet place and simply observe life. Every time you step away from the hustle and bustle of life, you give your mind and body a chance to breathe in and relax. And that is the art of happiness.
6. Ichigo Ichie and mindfulness
Aligning with our natural senses of touch, sight, hearing, smell, and taste allows us to better experience the richness of perception. The more aware you are, the more you focus on positivity. The more mindful you are, the more you notice how other people react. And that lets you be more empathic.
7. Are they all coincidences?
Like Master Oogway had said, there are no accidents. There is only the present. So notice each coincidence around you. What you feel is an accidental encounter is indeed a sign from the universe. The invisible threads of reality are there to guide us in our daily lives, but first, we need to learn the signs.
8. Every gathering is a party
Why do humans postpone their own happiness? When will we be happy in the present moment? Why will it take a planned holiday where you get to feel happiness only in a limited number of days? Appreciate life and all those you have in your life every day. Stop waiting for special occasions- make every moment special. It is the shift of mindset that sets the tone of our lives.
9. Be the change
One of the best gifts we have is the power of transformation. We can change and evolve as many times as we want. If you feel like your life is not aligned with the philosophy of Ichigo Ichie, what is stopping you from changing it all? Get up and bring the changes necessary!
10. Collect your moments
Go out and hunt those special moments. They won’t be presented to you on a platter. The more you practice, the greater your joys. Find abundance through your own efforts to seek happiness.
Hector Garcia and Francesc Miralles’ “The Book of Ichigo Ichie,” tells us how to master mindfulness and the art of happiness. We get so busy at times that we even forget to breathe. It reminds us to pause and appreciate the present. Are you ready to make the most of your life?
By Mayukh Saha


consciouslifenews--2020-11-18--Former Vatican Insider Says “The Great Reset” Will Be Used to “Drastically Limit” Human Freedom

• The Facts : The former Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State , Carlo Maria Viganò , wrote a second letter to Donald Trump concerning the “ The Great Reset ” initiative , expressing that it 's being used to take away our rights and freedoms • Reflect On : Why are certain narratives that have substantial evidence and concerns behind them always ignored by mainstream media ?
Why are they constantly ridiculed and deemed a “ conspiracy theory ” ?
The Great Reset is an initiative created by the World Economic Forum .
The House of Windsor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nations ( UN ) are prime executive co-producers of the plan , and top sponsors include BP , Mastercard , and Microsoft .
According to them : There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis .
To improve the state of the world , the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset Initiative .
They go on to explain all of the disruptions we are facing in our current COVID climate are : “ changing the traditional context for decision @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and contradictions of multiple systems – from health and finance to energy , environment , and education – are more exposed than ever amidst a global context of concern for lives , livelihoods and the planet.
” This ‘ Great Reset ’ plan has come under fire by many , seeing it as an initiative under the guise of goodwill to maintain and empower , as Dr. Vandana Shiva calls it , “ a corporate extraction machine and the private ownership of life.
” What Happened : The former Apostolic Nuncio to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Viganò previously served as Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State has also raised concerns .
A few months ago he wrote a letter to President Donald Trump bringing up what he called the “ deep state , ” as well as the idea that the COVID pandemic has been one giant “ social engineering experiment.
” He recently penned another letter to Trump , this time it was about The Great Reset : A global plan called the Great Reset is underway .
Its architect is a global élite that wants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations .
In several nations this plan has already been approved and financed ; in others , it is still in an early stage .
Behind the world leaders who are the accomplices and executors of this infernal project , there are unscrupulous characters who finance the World Economic Forum and Event 201 , promoting their agenda .
The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures , hidden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ income and canceling the individual debt .
The price of these concessions from the International Monetary Fund will be the renunciation of private property and adherence to a program of vaccination against Covid-19 and Covid-21 promoted by Bill Gates with the collaboration of the main pharmaceutical groups .
Beyond the enormous economic interests that motivate the promoters of the Great Reset , the imposition of the vaccination will be accompanied by the requirement of a health passport and a digital ID , with the consequent contact tracing of the population of the entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these measures will be confined in detention camps or placed under house arrest , and all their assets will be confiscated .
You can access and read the entire letter here .
According to Ellen Brown , an attorney , and chair of the Public Banking Institute : “ No country will be allowed to opt-out because it would be endangering the rest…Who is behind the Great Reset and what it really entails are major questions that need their own article , but suffice it to say here that to escape the trap @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a mass awakening to what is really going on and collective resistance to it while there is still time .
There are hopeful signs that this is happening , including massive protests against economic shutdowns and restrictions , particularly in Europe ; a rash of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the lockdowns and of police power overreach ; and a flood of alternative media exposés despite widespread censorship .
Life as we know it will change .
We need to ensure that it changes in ways that serve the people and the productive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hard-won personal freedoms.
” Why This Matters : Perspectives like this are often deemed as “ conspiracy theories ” by the mainstream , and many onlookers follow suit to this cultural explanation .
But is this not worth discussing on a larger level ?
I recently wrote an article diving deep as to why such thoughts regarding The Great Rest and a “ New World Order ” are far from a conspiracy theory and are worthy of legitimate discussion : “ COVID-19 : A Precursor To A ‘ New World Order ?
’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feels as though it is time we must pull ourselves out of this adolescent , dismissive culture when it comes to these ideas , and begin looking at what they truly are .
My invitation here is , why are these topics not more widely discussed and critiqued ?
Why have they always deemed a conspiracy theory and constantly ridiculed ?
Sure , there may be aspects of the population that will agree with The Great Reset the way it is being presented , and it ’ s important to empathize with these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are coming from , and why they feel that way .
But , it ’ s just as important for these people to empathize with the thoughts shared in this article , and the one linked above , to understand where another huge aspect of this population is coming from and why they feel more authoritarian control is not necessarily the incredible future humanity is capable of .
Only then can we start understanding one another and start having real discussions .
This is far better than constantly being divided all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if we are constantly arguing with each other and believing those with opposing viewpoints are incapable of reasoning and examining evidence , we are not going to get anywhere .
Nobody is stupid .
It doesn ’ t matter so much whether or not we agree that something like The Great Reset is a planned conspiracy , it ’ s more important to deeply ask : is this the world we truly want to create ?
Is this what we are limited to creating , and if not , what holds us back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a collective to come together and do something ?
If we don ’ t want people who don ’ t truly represent us to have tremendous amounts of power , then we have to wake up and realize that it ’ s not them who has to change , it ’ s us .
If you ’ re feeling called to become a more effective change-maker in this critical time , consider becoming a member of CETV where this is the main focus of our conversations , original shows , and courses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dark moment of shame for the United States , Carlo Maria Viganò , corporate influence threatens human rights , featured , human rights , human rights abuse , the great reset , the Great Reset movement , The House of Windsor , The United Nations , The Vatican , Vatican City State , Vatican insider , World Economic Forum

By Arjun Walia | Collective Evolution
In Brief
The Facts:The former Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State, Carlo Maria Viganò, wrote a second letter to Donald Trump concerning the “The Great Reset” initiative, expressing that it's being used to take away our rights and freedoms
Reflect On:Why are certain narratives that have substantial evidence and concerns behind them always ignored by mainstream media? Why are they constantly ridiculed and deemed a “conspiracy theory”?
The Great Reset is an initiative created by the World Economic Forum. The House of Windsor (Royal Family) and the United Nations (UN) are prime executive co-producers of the plan, and top sponsors include BP, Mastercard, and Microsoft. According to them:
There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset Initiative.
They go on to explain all of the disruptions we are facing in our current COVID climate are:
“changing the traditional context for decision making. The inconsistencies, inadequacies, and contradictions of multiple systems – from health and finance to energy, environment, and education – are more exposed than ever amidst a global context of concern for lives, livelihoods and the planet.”
This ‘Great Reset’ plan has come under fire by many, seeing it as an initiative under the guise of goodwill to maintain and empower, as Dr. Vandana Shiva calls it, “a corporate extraction machine and the private ownership of life.”
What Happened: The former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America, Carlo Maria Viganò previously served as Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State has also raised concerns.
A few months ago he wrote a letter to President Donald Trump bringing up what he called the “deep state,” as well as the idea that the COVID pandemic has been one giant “social engineering experiment.”
He recently penned another letter to Trump, this time it was about The Great Reset:
A global plan called the Great Reset is underway. Its architect is a global élite that wants to subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations. In several nations this plan has already been approved and financed; in others, it is still in an early stage. Behind the world leaders who are the accomplices and executors of this infernal project, there are unscrupulous characters who finance the World Economic Forum and Event 201, promoting their agenda.
The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and canceling the individual debt. The price of these concessions from the International Monetary Fund will be the renunciation of private property and adherence to a program of vaccination against Covid-19 and Covid-21 promoted by Bill Gates with the collaboration of the main pharmaceutical groups. Beyond the enormous economic interests that motivate the promoters of the Great Reset, the imposition of the vaccination will be accompanied by the requirement of a health passport and a digital ID, with the consequent contact tracing of the population of the entire world. Those who do not accept these measures will be confined in detention camps or placed under house arrest, and all their assets will be confiscated.
You can access and read the entire letter here.
According to Ellen Brown, an attorney, and chair of the Public Banking Institute:
“No country will be allowed to opt-out because it would be endangering the rest…Who is behind the Great Reset and what it really entails are major questions that need their own article, but suffice it to say here that to escape the trap of the globalist agenda, we need a mass awakening to what is really going on and collective resistance to it while there is still time. There are hopeful signs that this is happening, including massive protests against economic shutdowns and restrictions, particularly in Europe; a rash of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the lockdowns and of police power overreach; and a flood of alternative media exposés despite widespread censorship.
Life as we know it will change. We need to ensure that it changes in ways that serve the people and the productive economy while preserving our national sovereignty and hard-won personal freedoms.”
Why This Matters: Perspectives like this are often deemed as “conspiracy theories” by the mainstream, and many onlookers follow suit to this cultural explanation. But is this not worth discussing on a larger level? I recently wrote an article diving deep as to why such thoughts regarding The Great Rest and a “New World Order” are far from a conspiracy theory and are worthy of legitimate discussion: “COVID-19: A Precursor To A ‘New World Order?’ aka “The Great Reset.“
It feels as though it is time we must pull ourselves out of this adolescent, dismissive culture when it comes to these ideas, and begin looking at what they truly are.
My invitation here is, why are these topics not more widely discussed and critiqued? Why have they always deemed a conspiracy theory and constantly ridiculed? Sure, there may be aspects of the population that will agree with The Great Reset the way it is being presented, and it’s important to empathize with these individuals because we need to understand where they are coming from, and why they feel that way. But, it’s just as important for these people to empathize with the thoughts shared in this article, and the one linked above, to understand where another huge aspect of this population is coming from and why they feel more authoritarian control is not necessarily the incredible future humanity is capable of.
Only then can we start understanding one another and start having real discussions. This is far better than constantly being divided all the time. One thing is for certain if we are constantly arguing with each other and believing those with opposing viewpoints are incapable of reasoning and examining evidence, we are not going to get anywhere. Nobody is stupid.
It doesn’t matter so much whether or not we agree that something like The Great Reset is a planned conspiracy, it’s more important to deeply ask: is this the world we truly want to create? Is this what we are limited to creating, and if not, what holds us back? What power would we have if as a collective to come together and do something?
If we don’t want people who don’t truly represent us to have tremendous amounts of power, then we have to wake up and realize that it’s not them who has to change, it’s us.
If you’re feeling called to become a more effective change-maker in this critical time, consider becoming a member of CETV where this is the main focus of our conversations, original shows, and courses.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-18--Morning Inspiration: Finding Your Path and Purpose (Motivational Video)

There 's a new way of being and that is by searching and extending your knowledge .
In this way @ @ @ @ @ of yourself and your surroundings .
In this way , you can find your true @ @ @ @ @ you know that you are on your path ?
Because it disappears , that 's @ @ @ @ @ do you know that you are really doing something radical because you ca n't see @ @ @ @ @ that 's how you know.
” “ What is this thing called your essence and @ @ @ @ @ ” Tags : `` featured , doing something radical , featured , finding your path @ @ @ @ @ , how to reach your goals , the path to your destiny

Source: Mulligan Brothers MOTIVATION
There's a new way of being and that is by searching and extending your knowledge. In this way, you become more aware of yourself and your surroundings. In this way, you can find your true path.
“How do you know that you are on your path? Because it disappears, that's how you know. How do you know that you are really doing something radical because you can't see where you're going, that's how you know.”
“What is this thing called your essence and where does it go?”
Watch and be motivated today!!


consciouslifenews--2020-11-18--Cyber War Declared in U.S. and UK to Quash Vaccine Hesitancy as Nations Prepare for Mass Inoculation

Cyber War Declared in U.S. and UK to Quash Vaccine Hesitancy as Nations Prepare for Mass Inoculations

The U.K. newspaper The Times reported that the U.K. ’ s GCHQ “ has begun an offensive cyber-operation to disrupt anti-vaccine propaganda being spread by hostile states ” and “ is using a toolkit developed to tackle disinformation and recruitment material peddled by Islamic State ” to do so .
In addition , the U.K. government has ordered the British military ’ s 77th Brigade , which specializes in “ information warfare , ” to launch an online campaign to counter “ deceptive narratives ” about COVID-19 vaccine candidates .
The newly announced GCHQ “ cyberwar ” will not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will also seek to “ disrupt the operations of the cyber-actors responsible for it , including encrypting their data so they can not access it and blocking their communications with each other.
” The effort will also involve GCHQ reaching out to other countries in the “ Five Eyes ” alliance ( U.S. , Australia , New Zealand , and Canada ) to alert their partner agencies in those countries to target such “ propaganda ” sites hosted within their borders .
The Times stated that “ the government regards tackling false information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the prospect of a reliable vaccine against the coronavirus draws closer , ” suggesting that efforts will continue to ramp up as a vaccine candidate gets closer to approval .
It seems that , from the perspective of the U.K. national-security state , those who question corruption in the pharmaceutical industry and its possible impact on the leading experimental COVID-19 vaccine candidates ( all of which use experimental vaccine technologies that have never before been approved for human use ) should be targeted with tools originally designed to combat terrorist propaganda .
While @ @ @ @ @ @ @ target content “ that originated only from state adversaries ” and would not target the sites of “ ordinary citizens , ” the newspaper suggested that the effort would rely on the U.S. government for determining whether or not a site is part of a “ foreign disinformation ” operation .
This is highly troubling given that the U.S. recently seized the domains of many sites , including the American Herald Tribune , which it erroneously labeled as “ Iranian propaganda , ” despite its editor in chief , Anthony Hall , being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made this claim about the American Herald Tribune after the cybersecurity firm FireEye , a U.S. government contractor stated that it had “ moderate confidence ” that the site had been “ founded in Iran.
” In addition , the fact that GCHQ has alleged that most of the sites it plans to target are “ linked to Moscow ” gives further cause for concern given that the U.K. government was caught funding the Institute for Statecraft ’ s Integrity Initiative , which falsely labeled critics of the U.K. government ’ s actions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Syria conflict as being related to “ Russian disinformation ” campaigns .
Given this precedent , it is certainly plausible that GCHQ could take the word of either an allied government , a government contractor or perhaps even an allied media organization such as Bellingcat or the Atlantic Council ’ s DFRLab that a given site is “ foreign propaganda ” in order to launch a cyber offensive against it .
Such concerns are only amplified when one of the main government sources for The Times article bluntly stated that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antivaxers [ sic ] online and on social media .
There are ways they have used to monitor and disrupt terrorist propaganda , ” which suggests that the targets of GCHQ ’ s new cyberwar will , in fact , be determined by the content itself rather than their suspected “ foreign ” origin .
The “ foreign ” aspect instead appears to be a means of evading the prohibition in GCHQ ’ s operational mandate on targeting the speech or websites of ordinary citizens .
This larger pivot toward treating alleged “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” has been ongoing for much of this year , spearheaded in part by Imran Ahmed , the CEO of the U.K.-based Center for Countering Digital Hate , a member of the U.K. government ’ s Steering Committee on Countering Extremism Pilot Task Force , which is part of the U.K. government ’ s Commission for Countering Extremism .
Ahmed told the U.K. newspaper The Independent in July that “ I would go beyond calling anti-vaxxers conspiracy theorists to say they are an extremist group that poses a national security risk.
” He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been exposed to one type of conspiracy it ’ s easy to lead them down a path where they embrace more radical world views that can lead to violent extremism , ” thereby implying that “ anti-vaxxers ” might engage in acts of violent extremism .
Among the websites cited by Ahmed ’ s organization as promoting such “ extremism ” that poses a “ national security risk ” were Children ’ s Health Defense , the National Vaccine Information Center , Informed Consent Action Network , and Mercola.com , among others .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. intelligence — whose GCHQ equivalent , the National Security Agency ( NSA ) , will take part in the newly announced “ cyberwar ” — argued in a research paper published just months before the onset of the COVID-19 crisis that “ the U.S. ‘ anti-vaxxer ’ movement would pose a threat to national security in the event of a ‘ pandemic with a novel organism.
’ ” InfraGard , “ a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and members of the private sector , ” warned in the paper published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ movement would also be connected with ‘ social media misinformation and propaganda campaigns ’ orchestrated by the Russian government , ” as cited by The Guardian .
The InfraGard paper further claimed that prominent “ anti-vaxxers ” are aligned “ with other conspiracy movements including the far-right …and social media misinformation and propaganda campaigns by many foreign and domestic actors .
Included among these actors is the Internet Research Agency , the Russian government-aligned organization.
” An article published just last month by the Washington Post argued that “ vaccine hesitancy is mixing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American conspiracy theories , including Qanon , ” which the FBI named a potential domestic terror threat last year .
The article quoted Peter Hotez , dean of the School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston , as saying “ The U.S. anti-vaccination movement is globalizing and it ’ s going toward more-extremist tendencies.
” It is worth pointing out that many so-called “ anti-vaxxers ” are actually critics of the pharmaceutical industry and are not necessarily opposed to vaccines in and of themselves , making the labels “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Given that many pharmaceutical giants involved in making COVID-19 vaccines donate heavily to politicians in both countries and have been involved in numerous safety scandals , using state intelligence agencies to wage cyberwar against sites that investigate such concerns is not only troubling for the future of journalism but it suggests that the U.K. is taking a dangerous leap toward becoming a country that uses its state powers to treat the enemies of corporations as enemies of the state .
In early October , the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Special Operations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ multimillion-dollar contract to the U.S.-based “ machine intelligence ” company Primer .
Per the press release , “ Primer will develop the first-ever machine learning platform to automatically identify and assess suspected disinformation [ emphasis added ] .
The primer will also enhance its natural language processing platform to automatically analyze tactical events to provide commanders with unprecedented insight as events unfold in near real-time.
” According to Primer , the company “ builds software machines that read and write in English , Russian , and Chinese to automatically unearth trends and patterns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their work “ supports the mission of the intelligence community and broader DOD by automating reading and research tasks to enhance the speed and quality of decision-making.
” In other words , Primer is developing an algorithm that would allow the national-security state to outsource many military and intelligence analyst positions to AI .
In fact , the company openly admits this , stating that their current effort “ will automate the work typically done by dozens of analysts in a security operations center to ingest all of the data relevant to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it into a unified user interface.
” Primer ’ s ultimate goal is to use their AI to entirely automate the shaping of public perceptions and become the arbiter of “ truth , ” as defined by the state .
Primer ’ s founder , Sean Gourley , who previously created AI programs for the military to track “ insurgency ” in post-invasion Iraq , asserted in an April blog post that “ computational warfare and disinformation campaigns will , in 2020 , become a more serious threat than physical war , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we deploy to fight them.
” In that same post , Gourley argued for the creation of a “ Manhattan Project for truth ” that would create a publicly available Wikipedia-style database built off of “ knowledge bases [ that ] already exist inside many countries ’ intelligence agencies for national security purposes.
” Gourley then wrote that “ this effort would be ultimately about building and enhancing our collective intelligence and establishing a baseline for what ’ s true or not ” as established by intelligence agencies .
He concludes his blog @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we will begin to weaponize truth.
” Notably , on Nov. 9 , the same day that GCHQ announced its plans to target “ anti-vaccine propaganda , ” the U.S. website NextGov reported that Primer ’ s Pentagon-funded effort had turned its attention specifically to “ COVID-19 related disinformation.
” According to Primer ’ s director of science , John Bohannon , “ Primer will be integrating bot detection , synthetic text detection , and unstructured textual claims analysis capabilities into our existing artificial intelligence platform currently in use with DOD … @ @ @ @ @ @ @ platform to effectively counter COVID-19-related disinformation in near-real-time.
” Bohannon , who previously worked as a mainstream journalist embedded with NATO forces in Afghanistan , also told NextGov that Primer ’ s new COVID-19–focused effort “ automatically classifies documents into one of 10 categories to enable the detection of the impact of COVID ” on areas such as “ business , science and technology , employment , the global economy , and elections.
” The final product is expected to be delivered to the Pentagon in the second quarter of next year .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is deeply linked to the national-security state it is designed to protect by “ weaponizing truth.
” Primer proudly promotes itself as having more than 15 percent of its staff hailing from the U.S. intelligence community or military .
The director of the company ’ s National Security Group is Brian Raymond , a former CIA intelligence officer who served as the Director for Iraq on the U.S. National Security Council after leaving the agency .
The company also recently added several prominent national-security officials to its board including : • Retired Gen. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all U.S. and NATO Special Operations Forces in Afghanistan and is the former commander of both U.S. Special Operations Command and Joint Special Operations Command ( JSOC ) .
• Retired Lt. Gen. VeraLinn Jamieson , the former deputy chief of staff for Air Force Intelligence , Surveillance , and Reconnaissance who led the Air Force ’ s intelligence and cyber forces .
She also personally developed “ strategic partnerships ” between the Air Force and Microsoft , Amazon , Google , and IBM in order “ to accelerate the Air Force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ McGurk , one of the “ chief architects ” of the Iraq War “ surge , ” alongside the notorious Kagan family , as NSC Director for Iraq , and then as special assistant to the president and senior director for Iraq and Afghanistan during the Bush administration .
Under Obama and during part of the Trump administration , McGurk was the special presidential envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS at the State Department , helping to manage the “ dirty war ” waged by the U.S. , the U.K. , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addition to those recent board hires , Primer brought on Sue Gordon , the former principal deputy director of National Intelligence , as a strategic adviser .
Gordon previously “ drove partnerships within the U.S. Intelligence Community and provided advice to the National Security Council in her role as deputy director of national intelligence ” and had a twenty-seven-year career at the CIA .
The deep links are unsurprising , given that Primer is financially backed by the CIA ’ s venture-capital arm In-Q-Tel and the venture-capital arm of billionaire Mike Bloomberg , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest by the U.S. and U.K. national-security states toward COVID-19 “ disinformation , ” particularly as it relates to upcoming COVID-19 vaccination campaigns , is intimately related to the media-engagement strategy of the U.S. government ’ s Operation Warp Speed .
Officially a “ public-private partnership , ” Operation Warp Speed , which has the goal of vaccinating 300 million Americans by next January , is dominated by the U.S. military and also involves several U.S. intelligence agencies , including the NSA and the Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oracle , and Palantir .
Several reports published in The Last American Vagabond by this author and journalist Derrick Broze have revealed the extreme secrecy of the operation , its numerous conflicts of interest , and its deep ties to Silicon Valley and Orwellian technocratic initiatives .
Warp Speed ’ s official guidance discusses at length its phased plan for engaging the public and addressing issues of “ vaccine hesitancy.
” According to the Warp Speed document entitled “ From the Factory to the Frontlines , ” “ strategic communications and public messaging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines , requiring a saturation of messaging across the national media.
” It also states that “ working with established partners — especially those that are trusted sources for target audiences — is critical to advancing public understanding of , access to , and acceptance of eventual vaccines ” and that “ identifying the right messages to promote vaccine confidence , countering misinformation , and targeting outreach to vulnerable and at-risk populations will be necessary to achieve high coverage.
” The document also notes that Warp Speed will employ the CDC ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The third pillar of that strategy is entitled “ Stop Myths ” and has as the main focus “ establish [ ing ] partnerships to contain the spread of misinformation ” as well as “ work [ ing ] with local partners and trusted messengers to improve confidence in vaccines.
” Though that particular Warp Speed document is short on specifics , the CDC ’ s COVID-19 Vaccination Program Interim Playbook contains additional information .
It states that Operation Warp Speed will “ engage and use a wide range of partners , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ channels to achieve communication goals , understanding that channel preferences and credible sources vary among audiences and people at higher risk for severe illness and critical populations , and channels vary in their capacity to achieve different communication objectives.
” It states that it will focus its efforts in this regard on “ traditional media channels ” ( print , radio , and TV ) as well as “ digital media ” ( internet , social media , and text messaging ) .
The CDC document further reveals that the “ public messaging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and address “ vaccine hesitancy ” is divided into four phases and adds that the overall communication strategy of Warp Speed “ should be timely and applicable for the current phase of the COVID-19 Vaccination program.
” • Before a vaccine is available .
• The vaccine is available in limited supply for certain populations of early focus .
• The vaccine is increasingly available for other critical populations and the general public .
• The vaccine is widely available .
Given that the COVID-19 vaccine candidate produced by Pfizer is expected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ November , it appears that the U.S. national-security state , which is essentially running Operation Warp Speed , along with “ trusted messengers ” in mass media , is preparing to enter the second phase of its communications strategy , one in which news organizations and journalists who raise legitimate concerns about Warp Speed will be de-platformed to make way for the “ required ” saturation of pro-vaccine messaging across the English-speaking media landscape .

By Whitney Webb | The Defender
In just the past week, the national-security states of the U.S. and UK have discreetly let it be known that the cyber tools and online tactics previously designed for use in the post-9/11 “war on terror” are now being repurposed for use against information sources promoting “vaccine hesitancy” and information related to COVID-19 that runs counter to their state narratives.
A new cyber offensive was launched on Monday by the U.K.’s signal intelligence agency, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), which seeks to target websites that publish content deemed to be “propaganda” that raises concerns regarding state-sponsored COVID-19 vaccine development and the multinational pharmaceutical corporations involved.
Similar efforts are underway in the U.S., with the U.S. military recently funding a CIA-backed firm — stuffed with former counterterrorism officials who were behind the occupation of Iraq and the rise of the so-called Islamic State — to develop an AI algorithm aimed specifically at new websites promoting “suspected” disinformation related to the COVID-19 crisis and the U.S. military-led COVID-19 vaccination effort known as Operation Warp Speed.
Both countries are preparing to silence independent journalists who raise legitimate concerns over pharmaceutical industry corruption or the extreme secrecy surrounding state-sponsored COVID-19 vaccination efforts, now that Pfizer’s vaccine candidate is slated to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by month’s end.
Pfizer’s history of being fined billions for illegal marketing and for bribing government officials to help them cover up an illegal drug trial that killed eleven children (among other crimes) has gone unmentioned by most mass media outlets, which instead have celebrated the apparently imminent approval of the company’s COVID vaccine without questioning the company’s history or that the mRNA technology used in the vaccine has sped through normal safety trial protocols and has never been approved for human use. Also unmentioned is that the head of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Patrizia Cavazzoni, is the former Pfizer vice president for product safety who covered up the connection of one of its products to birth defects.
Essentially, the power of the state is being wielded like never before to police online speech and to deplatform news websites to protect the interests of powerful corporations like Pfizer and other scandal-ridden pharmaceutical giants as well as the interests of the U.S. and U.K. national-security states, which themselves are intimately involved in the COVID-19 vaccination endeavor.
U.K. intelligence’s new cyberwar targeting “anti-vaccine propaganda”
The U.K. newspaper The Times reported that the U.K.’s GCHQ “has begun an offensive cyber-operation to disrupt anti-vaccine propaganda being spread by hostile states” and “is using a toolkit developed to tackle disinformation and recruitment material peddled by Islamic State” to do so. In addition, the U.K. government has ordered the British military’s 77th Brigade, which specializes in “information warfare,” to launch an online campaign to counter “deceptive narratives” about COVID-19 vaccine candidates.
The newly announced GCHQ “cyberwar” will not only take down “anti-vaccine propaganda” but will also seek to “disrupt the operations of the cyber-actors responsible for it, including encrypting their data so they cannot access it and blocking their communications with each other.” The effort will also involve GCHQ reaching out to other countries in the “Five Eyes” alliance (U.S., Australia, New Zealand, and Canada) to alert their partner agencies in those countries to target such “propaganda” sites hosted within their borders.
The Times stated that “the government regards tackling false information about inoculation as a rising priority as the prospect of a reliable vaccine against the coronavirus draws closer,” suggesting that efforts will continue to ramp up as a vaccine candidate gets closer to approval.
It seems that, from the perspective of the U.K. national-security state, those who question corruption in the pharmaceutical industry and its possible impact on the leading experimental COVID-19 vaccine candidates (all of which use experimental vaccine technologies that have never before been approved for human use) should be targeted with tools originally designed to combat terrorist propaganda.
While The Times asserted that the effort would target content “that originated only from state adversaries” and would not target the sites of “ordinary citizens,” the newspaper suggested that the effort would rely on the U.S. government for determining whether or not a site is part of a “foreign disinformation” operation.
This is highly troubling given that the U.S. recently seized the domains of many sites, including the American Herald Tribune, which it erroneously labeled as “Iranian propaganda,” despite its editor in chief, Anthony Hall, being based in Canada. The U.S. government made this claim about the American Herald Tribune after the cybersecurity firm FireEye, a U.S. government contractor stated that it had “moderate confidence” that the site had been “founded in Iran.”
In addition, the fact that GCHQ has alleged that most of the sites it plans to target are “linked to Moscow” gives further cause for concern given that the U.K. government was caught funding the Institute for Statecraft’s Integrity Initiative, which falsely labeled critics of the U.K. government’s actions as well as its narratives with respect to the Syria conflict as being related to “Russian disinformation” campaigns.
Given this precedent, it is certainly plausible that GCHQ could take the word of either an allied government, a government contractor or perhaps even an allied media organization such as Bellingcat or the Atlantic Council’s DFRLab that a given site is “foreign propaganda” in order to launch a cyber offensive against it. Such concerns are only amplified when one of the main government sources for The Times article bluntly stated that “GCHQ has been told to take out antivaxers [sic] online and on social media. There are ways they have used to monitor and disrupt terrorist propaganda,” which suggests that the targets of GCHQ’s new cyberwar will, in fact, be determined by the content itself rather than their suspected “foreign” origin. The “foreign” aspect instead appears to be a means of evading the prohibition in GCHQ’s operational mandate on targeting the speech or websites of ordinary citizens.
This larger pivot toward treating alleged “anti-vaxxers” as “national security threats” has been ongoing for much of this year, spearheaded in part by Imran Ahmed, the CEO of the U.K.-based Center for Countering Digital Hate, a member of the U.K. government’s Steering Committee on Countering Extremism Pilot Task Force, which is part of the U.K. government’s Commission for Countering Extremism.
Ahmed told the U.K. newspaper The Independent in July that “I would go beyond calling anti-vaxxers conspiracy theorists to say they are an extremist group that poses a national security risk.” He then stated that “once someone has been exposed to one type of conspiracy it’s easy to lead them down a path where they embrace more radical world views that can lead to violent extremism,” thereby implying that “anti-vaxxers” might engage in acts of violent extremism. Among the websites cited by Ahmed’s organization as promoting such “extremism” that poses a “national security risk” were Children’s Health Defense, the National Vaccine Information Center, Informed Consent Action Network, and Mercola.com, among others.
Similarly, a think tank tied to U.S. intelligence — whose GCHQ equivalent, the National Security Agency (NSA), will take part in the newly announced “cyberwar ”— argued in a research paper published just months before the onset of the COVID-19 crisis that “the U.S. ‘anti-vaxxer’ movement would pose a threat to national security in the event of a ‘pandemic with a novel organism.’”
InfraGard, “a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and members of the private sector,” warned in the paper published last June that “the U.S. anti-vaccine movement would also be connected with ‘social media misinformation and propaganda campaigns’ orchestrated by the Russian government,” as cited by The Guardian. The InfraGard paper further claimed that prominent “anti-vaxxers” are aligned “with other conspiracy movements including the far-right …and social media misinformation and propaganda campaigns by many foreign and domestic actors. Included among these actors is the Internet Research Agency, the Russian government-aligned organization.”
An article published just last month by the Washington Post argued that “vaccine hesitancy is mixing with coronavirus denial and merging with far-right American conspiracy theories, including Qanon,” which the FBI named a potential domestic terror threat last year. The article quoted Peter Hotez, dean of the School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, as saying “The U.S. anti-vaccination movement is globalizing and it’s going toward more-extremist tendencies.”
It is worth pointing out that many so-called “anti-vaxxers” are actually critics of the pharmaceutical industry and are not necessarily opposed to vaccines in and of themselves, making the labels “anti-vaxxer” and “anti-vaccine” misleading. Given that many pharmaceutical giants involved in making COVID-19 vaccines donate heavily to politicians in both countries and have been involved in numerous safety scandals, using state intelligence agencies to wage cyberwar against sites that investigate such concerns is not only troubling for the future of journalism but it suggests that the U.K. is taking a dangerous leap toward becoming a country that uses its state powers to treat the enemies of corporations as enemies of the state.
A CIA-backed firm “weaponizing truth” with AI
In early October, the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Special Operations Command announced that they had awarded a multimillion-dollar contract to the U.S.-based “machine intelligence” company Primer. Per the press release, “Primer will develop the first-ever machine learning platform to automatically identify and assess suspected disinformation [emphasis added]. The primer will also enhance its natural language processing platform to automatically analyze tactical events to provide commanders with unprecedented insight as events unfold in near real-time.”
According to Primer, the company “builds software machines that read and write in English, Russian, and Chinese to automatically unearth trends and patterns across large volumes of data,” and their work “supports the mission of the intelligence community and broader DOD by automating reading and research tasks to enhance the speed and quality of decision-making.” In other words, Primer is developing an algorithm that would allow the national-security state to outsource many military and intelligence analyst positions to AI. In fact, the company openly admits this, stating that their current effort “will automate the work typically done by dozens of analysts in a security operations center to ingest all of the data relevant to an event as it happens and funnel it into a unified user interface.”
Primer’s ultimate goal is to use their AI to entirely automate the shaping of public perceptions and become the arbiter of “truth,” as defined by the state. Primer’s founder, Sean Gourley, who previously created AI programs for the military to track “insurgency” in post-invasion Iraq, asserted in an April blog post that “computational warfare and disinformation campaigns will, in 2020, become a more serious threat than physical war, and we will have to rethink the weapons we deploy to fight them.”
In that same post, Gourley argued for the creation of a “Manhattan Project for truth” that would create a publicly available Wikipedia-style database built off of “knowledge bases [that] already exist inside many countries’ intelligence agencies for national security purposes.” Gourley then wrote that “this effort would be ultimately about building and enhancing our collective intelligence and establishing a baseline for what’s true or not” as established by intelligence agencies. He concludes his blog post by stating that “in 2020, we will begin to weaponize truth.”
Notably, on Nov. 9, the same day that GCHQ announced its plans to target “anti-vaccine propaganda,” the U.S. website NextGov reported that Primer’s Pentagon-funded effort had turned its attention specifically to “COVID-19 related disinformation.” According to Primer’s director of science, John Bohannon, “Primer will be integrating bot detection, synthetic text detection, and unstructured textual claims analysis capabilities into our existing artificial intelligence platform currently in use with DOD … This will create the first unified mission-ready platform to effectively counter COVID-19-related disinformation in near-real-time.”
Bohannon, who previously worked as a mainstream journalist embedded with NATO forces in Afghanistan, also told NextGov that Primer’s new COVID-19–focused effort “automatically classifies documents into one of 10 categories to enable the detection of the impact of COVID” on areas such as “business, science and technology, employment, the global economy, and elections.” The final product is expected to be delivered to the Pentagon in the second quarter of next year.
Though a so-called private company, Primer is deeply linked to the national-security state it is designed to protect by “weaponizing truth.” Primer proudly promotes itself as having more than 15 percent of its staff hailing from the U.S. intelligence community or military. The director of the company’s National Security Group is Brian Raymond, a former CIA intelligence officer who served as the Director for Iraq on the U.S. National Security Council after leaving the agency.
The company also recently added several prominent national-security officials to its board including:
Retired Gen. Raymond Thomas, who led the command of all U.S. and NATO Special Operations Forces in Afghanistan and is the former commander of both U.S. Special Operations Command and Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC).
Retired Lt. Gen. VeraLinn Jamieson, the former deputy chief of staff for Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance who led the Air Force’s intelligence and cyber forces. She also personally developed “strategic partnerships” between the Air Force and Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and IBM in order “to accelerate the Air Force’s digital transformation.”
Brett McGurk, one of the “chief architects” of the Iraq War “surge,” alongside the notorious Kagan family, as NSC Director for Iraq, and then as special assistant to the president and senior director for Iraq and Afghanistan during the Bush administration. Under Obama and during part of the Trump administration, McGurk was the special presidential envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS at the State Department, helping to manage the “dirty war” waged by the U.S., the U.K., and other allies against Syria.
In addition to those recent board hires, Primer brought on Sue Gordon, the former principal deputy director of National Intelligence, as a strategic adviser. Gordon previously “drove partnerships within the U.S. Intelligence Community and provided advice to the National Security Council in her role as deputy director of national intelligence” and had a twenty-seven-year career at the CIA. The deep links are unsurprising, given that Primer is financially backed by the CIA’s venture-capital arm In-Q-Tel and the venture-capital arm of billionaire Mike Bloomberg, Bloomberg Beta.
Operation Warp Speed’s disinformation blitzkrieg
The rapid increase in interest by the U.S. and U.K. national-security states toward COVID-19 “disinformation,” particularly as it relates to upcoming COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, is intimately related to the media-engagement strategy of the U.S. government’s Operation Warp Speed.
Officially a “public-private partnership,” Operation Warp Speed, which has the goal of vaccinating 300 million Americans by next January, is dominated by the U.S. military and also involves several U.S. intelligence agencies, including the NSA and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as well as intelligence-linked tech giants Google, Oracle, and Palantir. Several reports published in The Last American Vagabond by this author and journalist Derrick Broze have revealed the extreme secrecy of the operation, its numerous conflicts of interest, and its deep ties to Silicon Valley and Orwellian technocratic initiatives.
Warp Speed’s official guidance discusses at length its phased plan for engaging the public and addressing issues of “vaccine hesitancy.” According to the Warp Speed document entitled “From the Factory to the Frontlines,” “strategic communications and public messaging are critical to ensure maximum acceptance of vaccines, requiring a saturation of messaging across the national media.” It also states that “working with established partners — especially those that are trusted sources for target audiences — is critical to advancing public understanding of, access to, and acceptance of eventual vaccines” and that “identifying the right messages to promote vaccine confidence, countering misinformation, and targeting outreach to vulnerable and at-risk populations will be necessary to achieve high coverage.”
The document also notes that Warp Speed will employ the CDC’s three-pronged strategic framework for its communications effort. The third pillar of that strategy is entitled “Stop Myths” and has as the main focus “establish[ing] partnerships to contain the spread of misinformation” as well as “work[ing] with local partners and trusted messengers to improve confidence in vaccines.”
Though that particular Warp Speed document is short on specifics, the CDC’s COVID-19 Vaccination Program Interim Playbook contains additional information. It states that Operation Warp Speed will “engage and use a wide range of partners, collaborations, and communication and news media channels to achieve communication goals, understanding that channel preferences and credible sources vary among audiences and people at higher risk for severe illness and critical populations, and channels vary in their capacity to achieve different communication objectives.” It states that it will focus its efforts in this regard on “traditional media channels” (print, radio, and TV) as well as “digital media” (internet, social media, and text messaging).
The CDC document further reveals that the “public messaging” campaign to “promote vaccine uptake” and address “vaccine hesitancy” is divided into four phases and adds that the overall communication strategy of Warp Speed “should be timely and applicable for the current phase of the COVID-19 Vaccination program.”
Those phases are:
Before a vaccine is available.
The vaccine is available in limited supply for certain populations of early focus.
The vaccine is increasingly available for other critical populations and the general public.
The vaccine is widely available.
Given that the COVID-19 vaccine candidate produced by Pfizer is expected to be approved by the end of November, it appears that the U.S. national-security state, which is essentially running Operation Warp Speed, along with “trusted messengers” in mass media, is preparing to enter the second phase of its communications strategy, one in which news organizations and journalists who raise legitimate concerns about Warp Speed will be de-platformed to make way for the “required” saturation of pro-vaccine messaging across the English-speaking media landscape.
Published with permission from Unlimited Hangout.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-18--Pfizer Vaccine 90% Effective Claim Unsubstantiated by Peer-Review Journals and World Health Organiza

Pfizer Vaccine 90% Effective Claim Unsubstantiated by Peer-Review Journals and World Health Organization

It won ’ t have escaped you that the airwaves are currently booming with news from an interim report of the Phase 3 trial on the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccine , snappily named BNT162b2 .
It ’ s one of 48 vaccines under clinical evaluation that aims to protect against COVID-19 .
The primary source of the news , headlined by a “ 90 % effective ” claim , isn ’ t a peer-reviewed journal article .
Nor is it the World Health Organization ( WHO ) .
Rather , it ’ s a media release issued on Monday by Pfizer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ young German biotech company BioNTech , that developed the vaccine .
The news that the vaccine has been shown to be “ 90 % effective ” has sent Pfizer stocks flying , and caused the company ’ s recently appointed , ex-veterinarian chairman , Dr. Albert Bourla , to sell off 62 % of his personal stock in Pfizer .
The share sale was apparently tripped by an automated system set up in August when the share value hit a given price .
Pfizer was conspicuous , given its position as one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in excluding itself from the U.S. government Operation Warp Speed .
The downside for Pfizer was that it didn ’ t benefit from the U.S. government ( = taxpayer ) funding support that the likes of Moderna , Johnson & Johnson , and Astra-Zeneca have been privy to .
But don ’ t feel too bad , BioNTech received funding from the German government .
The plus side for Pfizer was that it didn ’ t need to be dictated to by others , and it didn ’ t need to data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a shared , Operation Warp Speed data monitoring committee .
Remember this as you read on .
So , what do the headlines really mean ?
Here ’ s the first problem .
We only have a press release to go on .
At ANH , we ’ re always keen to get to primary data sources so we had to look further .
The press release refers to an interim report on the Phase 3 trial by an “ external , independent Data Monitoring Committee ( DMC ) ” .
An article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pfizer ’ s DMC is anything but independent .
The anonymity of its 5 members also makes it anything but transparent .
We weren ’ t going to give up looking for the interim report given widespread calls , such as that in a September editorial in one of the world ’ s most influential journals , Nature , which argued : “ COVID vaccine confidence requires radical transparency ” .
We ’ d seen the protocol , but if better-than-expected interim primary outcomes were going to be cited , we had to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data behind the results available .
The first place we went hunting for the interim report was the WHO “ Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines ” page , that incidentally “ disclaims any and all liability or responsibility whatsoever for any death , disability , injury , suffering , loss , damage or other prejudice of any kind that may arise from or in connection with the procurement , distribution or use of any product included in any of these landscape documents ” .
Alas , while the WHO page was updated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there .
What you will find there is the now outdated trial design for the vaccine as a link to the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov portal .
But no interim study results .
A Google search using the terms ‘ “ Data Monitoring Committee ” BNT162b2 BioNTech Pfizer ’ and similar didn ’ t make it magically appear either , just lots of references to the “ 90 % effectiveness ” claim across a plethora of media channels .
Suffice to say , I think we can confirm that there are no supporting data for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ release .
The key pieces of information that fall out of it are as follows : • The claim in its full glory : “ more than 90 % effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2.
” • A link to an updated study design ( protocol ) which presumably replaces the one listed on ClinicalTrials.gov .
• 43,538 participants enrolled to-date ( 89 % of which have received the second dose ) • 42 % of participants have “ ethnically diverse backgrounds ” ( which begs the question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % ; surely not Caucasian ?
But probably . )
• 94 people out of the 43,538 participants ( i.e .
just 0.2 % ) have contracted COVID-19 so far , these being split between the vaccinated and placebo groups , the split not being reported .
• “ No serious safety concerns have been observed ” — which does not mean moderate or severe adverse reactions have not been observed .
Two months of safety data will be available at the time Pfizer applies for Emergency Use Authorization with the U.S. Food @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • The clearest statements of all appear in the disclosure notice and commentary on forward-looking statements at the end of the release that appears to be directed at the stock market .
They effectively abrogate Pfizer and BioNTech of any responsibility for the performance of the final product , especially in relation to effectiveness , safety or supply .
The lawyers are clearly being attentive to their clients given the world ’ s eyes are on them .
What can we make of this ?
In terms of the key statement on effectiveness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10 % of the infected group of 94 were infected .
If you round that up to 10 people , a 90 % claim that would make it 9 out of 10 were able to prevent infection post-vaccination .
Not a lot of people potentially — which is why Pfizer and BioNTech should have been clear about numbers because 60 is a lot different from 10 .
But , remember that the press release states “ over 90 % ” ?
Dialing in the inner Sherlock Holmes , just 11 of the infected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these exhibiting immunogenicity as per predetermined trial endpoints would do it ( 9 divided by 10 gives 90.9 % ) .
But for this interim endpoint , the protocol lists primary and secondary endpoints for effectiveness — principally the prevention of COVID-19 symptoms in those showing evidence of infection ( by nucleic acid amplification tests [ NAAT ] ) , as well as secondary ones — the development of various serological ( antibody ) results such as neutralizing antibody titers , S1-binding IgG and/or RBD-binding IgG levels , N-binding antibody .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And for how long ( too soon for that of course ) ?
What else would we need to know to understand better the BioNTech/Pfizer interim result ?
Key information that hasn ’ t yet been put into the public domain and could have accompanied the interim release includes : • The number of people in the vaccinated or placebo groups who were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 .
• The demography ( age , gender , ethnicity , etc ) of those who were infected and how many of these represent the most vulnerable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with comorbidities .
• On what particular outcome parameters were the effectiveness determined ?
Was it , for example , based on lack of COVID-19 disease symptoms combined with elevated antibody responses , and if so which ones ?
• How serious was the manifestation of COVID-19 disease in the equivalent vaccinated and placebo groups ( i.e.
, similar ages , gender , ethnicity , and underlying disease pattern ) ?
• What is the composition of the placebo that is being delivered to 50 % of the 44,000-strong study population ?
Does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mRNA that encodes for the full-length spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 ?
• What was the response of the cell-mediated ( T cell ) side of the adaptive immune system ( which are not included in the endpoints according to the trial protocol ) ?
The October publication of the Phase 1 results in the New England Journal of Medicine indicated it was the sister vaccine , BNT162b1 , that produced a strong T-cell response but this was dropped as the vaccine-induced some serious adverse reactions .
• What was the nature , severity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BNT162b2 reported until now in the Phase 3 trial ?
• How long will immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 persist in different people ?
There are also many unknowns that may well remain unknown .
Top of my list would be these two : • The possibility that some of the NAAT-confirmed cases involve infection with other human coronaviruses and it is these non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses that have triggered the measured immunogenicity and the NAAT results are either false positives or the result of SARS-CoV-2 viral fragments .
• The presence of non-replicable viral fragments of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ triggered immunogenic reactions so the infection could not anyway have occurred .
As so appropriately put by Peter Doshi , an associated editor of the BMJ and also an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , “ The lack of data is very concerning … All we have right now is a headline by Pfizer.
” What shall we make of it ?
I ’ ve taken you through my thoughts triggered by the press release .
You can see it ’ s led to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s raised more questions than it ’ s answered .
But let me distill my views down to the following : • In my view , it ’ s misleading , far too premature , and disingenuous for Pfizer to be telling the world that the trial has demonstrated 90 % effectiveness so far because most people will assume that that means , regardless of age , health status , ethnicity , or underlying conditions , if they get vaccinated with an emergency approved vaccine that has undergone just 2 months of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a 10 % chance of getting seriously ill if they become infected — and it will be safe .
There are insufficient data to support either outcome .
• It ’ s difficult to judge the effectiveness claim against what your chances might be if you remain unvaccinated .
But if you ’ re healthy and under 75-years-old , the chances of the serious disease are very low , probably much less than 10 % following infection .
But accurate estimates still can not be made because we continue to be blind to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infected , and therefore , also to the true rate of serious disease and mortality among those infected .
What we are also aware of are big variations in estimates of the number who are likely asymptomatic ( infected but without symptoms ) .
• Nothing can be said about the risk of harm from vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 such as triggering autoimmune conditions as the trials need to run their course and most of these kinds of problems are generally not picked up until years after the product is first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a normal 6-year development program .
Two months of post-vaccination adverse event reporting just doesn ’ t cut it if you want a proper handle on safety .
• If this vaccine fails to be effective a few months after its second doses have been administered , is there going to be a justification made for its mass roll-out , given the huge economic cost to society , the risk of harms , and the fact that healthy people seem to tolerate SARS-CoV-2 more than adequately ?
Remember , it was the alternate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found to enhance the T-cell response more , but had an unacceptable safety profile so was dropped .
• Where is the risk-cost-benefit analysis by governments showing that rollout is both necessary and justified ?
• Disturbingly , this announcement , and the lack of data associated with the press release , demonstrates that Pfizer and BioNTech have an incapacity for real and meaningful transparency .
This leads to one central question : Can the public truly afford to trust vaccine companies who deliberately withhold information and data and have preyed on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , while , at the same time , reaping the rewards from the stock market that has responded to a premature and unsupported announcement ?
Call me a conspiracy theorist , if you like , for asking this question .
Published with permission from Alliance for Natural Health International .

By Rob Verkerk Ph.D. | The Defender
It won’t have escaped you that the airwaves are currently booming with news from an interim report of the Phase 3 trial on the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccine, snappily named BNT162b2. It’s one of 48 vaccines under clinical evaluation that aims to protect against COVID-19. The primary source of the news, headlined by a “90% effective” claim, isn’t a peer-reviewed journal article. Nor is it the World Health Organization (WHO). Rather, it’s a media release issued on Monday by Pfizer, the commercial partner linked to the young German biotech company BioNTech, that developed the vaccine.
The news that the vaccine has been shown to be “90% effective” has sent Pfizer stocks flying, and caused the company’s recently appointed, ex-veterinarian chairman, Dr. Albert Bourla, to sell off 62% of his personal stock in Pfizer. The share sale was apparently tripped by an automated system set up in August when the share value hit a given price.
Chasing rainbows
Pfizer was conspicuous, given its position as one of the largest drug companies in the world, in excluding itself from the U.S. government Operation Warp Speed. The downside for Pfizer was that it didn’t benefit from the U.S. government (= taxpayer) funding support that the likes of Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and Astra-Zeneca have been privy to. But don’t feel too bad, BioNTech received funding from the German government. The plus side for Pfizer was that it didn’t need to be dictated to by others, and it didn’t need to data share or have its data analyzed by a shared, Operation Warp Speed data monitoring committee. Remember this as you read on.
So, what do the headlines really mean? Here’s the first problem. We only have a press release to go on. At ANH, we’re always keen to get to primary data sources so we had to look further. The press release refers to an interim report on the Phase 3 trial by an “external, independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)”. An article by the Kaiser Family Foundation suggests that Pfizer’s DMC is anything but independent. The anonymity of its 5 members also makes it anything but transparent.
We weren’t going to give up looking for the interim report given widespread calls, such as that in a September editorial in one of the world’s most influential journals, Nature, which argued: “COVID vaccine confidence requires radical transparency”.
We’d seen the protocol, but if better-than-expected interim primary outcomes were going to be cited, we had to assume Pfizer or BioNTech would make the data behind the results available. The first place we went hunting for the interim report was the WHO “Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines” page, that incidentally “disclaims any and all liability or responsibility whatsoever for any death, disability, injury, suffering, loss, damage or other prejudice of any kind that may arise from or in connection with the procurement, distribution or use of any product included in any of these landscape documents”.
Alas, while the WHO page was updated yesterday, the report isn’t there. What you will find there is the now outdated trial design for the vaccine as a link to the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov portal. But no interim study results. A Google search using the terms ‘“Data Monitoring Committee” BNT162b2 BioNTech Pfizer’ and similar didn’t make it magically appear either, just lots of references to the “90% effectiveness” claim across a plethora of media channels. Suffice to say, I think we can confirm that there are no supporting data for the claim.
What we’ve been told
Back to the press release. The key pieces of information that fall out of it are as follows:
The claim in its full glory: “more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2.”
A link to an updated study design (protocol) which presumably replaces the one listed on ClinicalTrials.gov.
43,538 participants enrolled to-date (89% of which have received the second dose)
42% of participants have “ethnically diverse backgrounds” (which begs the question of what ethnicity is the non-diverse 58%; surely not Caucasian? But probably.)
94 people out of the 43,538 participants (i.e. just 0.2%) have contracted COVID-19 so far, these being split between the vaccinated and placebo groups, the split not being reported.
“No serious safety concerns have been observed” — which does not mean moderate or severe adverse reactions have not been observed. Two months of safety data will be available at the time Pfizer applies for Emergency Use Authorization with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The clearest statements of all appear in the disclosure notice and commentary on forward-looking statements at the end of the release that appears to be directed at the stock market. They effectively abrogate Pfizer and BioNTech of any responsibility for the performance of the final product, especially in relation to effectiveness, safety or supply. The lawyers are clearly being attentive to their clients given the world’s eyes are on them.
What can we make of this?
In terms of the key statement on effectiveness, let’s say that just 10% of the infected group of 94 were infected. If you round that up to 10 people, a 90% claim that would make it 9 out of 10 were able to prevent infection post-vaccination. Not a lot of people potentially — which is why Pfizer and BioNTech should have been clear about numbers because 60 is a lot different from 10. But, remember that the press release states “over 90%”? Dialing in the inner Sherlock Holmes, just 11 of the infected group also being vaccinated, with 10 of these exhibiting immunogenicity as per predetermined trial endpoints would do it (9 divided by 10 gives 90.9%).
But for this interim endpoint, the protocol lists primary and secondary endpoints for effectiveness — principally the prevention of COVID-19 symptoms in those showing evidence of infection (by nucleic acid amplification tests [NAAT]), as well as secondary ones — the development of various serological (antibody) results such as neutralizing antibody titers, S1-binding IgG and/or RBD-binding IgG levels, N-binding antibody. But which ones and by how much? And for how long (too soon for that of course)?
What else would we need to know to understand better the BioNTech/Pfizer interim result? Key information that hasn’t yet been put into the public domain and could have accompanied the interim release includes:
The number of people in the vaccinated or placebo groups who were exposed to SARS-CoV-2.
The demography (age, gender, ethnicity, etc) of those who were infected and how many of these represent the most vulnerable groups i.e., the elderly or those with comorbidities.
On what particular outcome parameters were the effectiveness determined? Was it, for example, based on lack of COVID-19 disease symptoms combined with elevated antibody responses, and if so which ones?
How serious was the manifestation of COVID-19 disease in the equivalent vaccinated and placebo groups (i.e., similar ages, gender, ethnicity, and underlying disease pattern)?
What is the composition of the placebo that is being delivered to 50% of the 44,000-strong study population? Does it include the lipid nanoparticle minus the mRNA that encodes for the full-length spike protein of SARS-CoV-2?
What was the response of the cell-mediated (T cell) side of the adaptive immune system (which are not included in the endpoints according to the trial protocol)? The October publication of the Phase 1 results in the New England Journal of Medicine indicated it was the sister vaccine, BNT162b1, that produced a strong T-cell response but this was dropped as the vaccine-induced some serious adverse reactions.
What was the nature, severity, and extent of adverse events to BNT162b2 reported until now in the Phase 3 trial?
How long will immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 persist in different people?
Unknowns
There are also many unknowns that may well remain unknown. Top of my list would be these two:
The possibility that some of the NAAT-confirmed cases involve infection with other human coronaviruses and it is these non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses that have triggered the measured immunogenicity and the NAAT results are either false positives or the result of SARS-CoV-2 viral fragments.
The presence of non-replicable viral fragments of (‘dead’) SARS-CoV2 has triggered immunogenic reactions so the infection could not anyway have occurred.
As transparent as a not-quite-black box
As so appropriately put by Peter Doshi, an associated editor of the BMJ and also an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, “The lack of data is very concerning … All we have right now is a headline by Pfizer.”
What shall we make of it?
I’ve taken you through my thoughts triggered by the press release. You can see it’s led to a number of dead ends and it’s raised more questions than it’s answered. But let me distill my views down to the following:
In my view, it’s misleading, far too premature, and disingenuous for Pfizer to be telling the world that the trial has demonstrated 90% effectiveness so far because most people will assume that that means, regardless of age, health status, ethnicity, or underlying conditions, if they get vaccinated with an emergency approved vaccine that has undergone just 2 months of safety evaluation, they will have only a 10% chance of getting seriously ill if they become infected — and it will be safe. There are insufficient data to support either outcome.
It’s difficult to judge the effectiveness claim against what your chances might be if you remain unvaccinated. But if you’re healthy and under 75-years-old, the chances of the serious disease are very low, probably much less than 10% following infection. But accurate estimates still cannot be made because we continue to be blind to the number of people who have been infected, and therefore, also to the true rate of serious disease and mortality among those infected. What we are also aware of are big variations in estimates of the number who are likely asymptomatic (infected but without symptoms).
Nothing can be said about the risk of harm from vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 such as triggering autoimmune conditions as the trials need to run their course and most of these kinds of problems are generally not picked up until years after the product is first marketed. And that’s assuming a normal 6-year development program. Two months of post-vaccination adverse event reporting just doesn’t cut it if you want a proper handle on safety.
If this vaccine fails to be effective a few months after its second doses have been administered, is there going to be a justification made for its mass roll-out, given the huge economic cost to society, the risk of harms, and the fact that healthy people seem to tolerate SARS-CoV-2 more than adequately? Remember, it was the alternate BioNTech vaccine, BNT162b1, that was found to enhance the T-cell response more, but had an unacceptable safety profile so was dropped.
Where is the risk-cost-benefit analysis by governments showing that rollout is both necessary and justified?
Disturbingly, this announcement, and the lack of data associated with the press release, demonstrates that Pfizer and BioNTech have an incapacity for real and meaningful transparency.
This leads to one central question: Can the public truly afford to trust vaccine companies who deliberately withhold information and data and have preyed on the public’s desperation to escape lockdowns, while, at the same time, reaping the rewards from the stock market that has responded to a premature and unsupported announcement?
Call me a conspiracy theorist, if you like, for asking this question.
Published with permission from Alliance for Natural Health International.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-18--How To Use Social Media For Your Business

It is fair to say that .
After all , the , with the majority of this time being spent on websites such as Facebook , Instagram , and Twitter .
While many people use social media to keep up to date with their friends and family , it can also be used effectively as a business tool , helping you grow and develop your brand whilst increasing profits .
With that in mind , here are some top tips on how to best use social media to promote your company and work .
One of the most important things @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presence is the image you want to represent .
How you design your posts ( the written content and accompanying pictures/graphics ) , should match your brand perfectly .
Try to stick to the colors featured in your logo , or use a set filter over photographs so that they all look similar .
When you follow these steps , clients will be more drawn towards your socials as they look well thought out and professional .
As a result , they are more likely to follow the account and make a purchase @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has , the more likely you are to succeed financially .
One way to increase a presence is to be consistent within your posting .
You should not post more than once a day ( except for Instagram stories ) and you should try to stick to a regular posting schedule .
When you are inactive , you are likely to lose followers .
Plan for the kind of content you want to produce and schedule to go out ahead of time .
The best way to understand whether or not your social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ investing in .
Software , provided by companies such as VisualVistor , will allow you to find out more about your clients .
Whenever they open your website , phone your hotline , or make a purchase – you will be able to find out where they found out about your company or what links they have clicked on .
This means you can find out which of your social media pages has the best outreach/is bringing you the most traffic .
As a result , you can adjust your spending accordingly – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attention to drive sales even further .
Marketing software also allows you to share customer reviews on your website or socials with just a click of a button .
This is a great way of boosting your online presence and can draw in clients , especially if the reviews are particularly positive .
Taking on feedback from your customers is also a great way to build trust with your customers it shows that you value their thoughts/opinions .
When a customer or potential customer feels valued , they are more likely to make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the future .
Therefore , you must use your social media to show your clients how much you value them .
This can be as simple as replying to/liking comments or any tagged photographs , or uploading opinion polls for them to answer onto your stories .
Staying connected with customers , especially during this time , is vital in succeeding in a technological world .

Photo by Merakist on Unsplash
It is fair to say that social media has changed the modern world . After all, the average person spends 144 minutes a day online , with the majority of this time being spent on websites such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. While many people use social media to keep up to date with their friends and family, it can also be used effectively as a business tool, helping you grow and develop your brand whilst increasing profits. With that in mind, here are some top tips on how to best use social media to promote your company and work.
Build a brand
One of the most important things to consider when cultivating your social media presence is the image you want to represent. How you design your posts (the written content and accompanying pictures/graphics), should match your brand perfectly. Try to stick to the colors featured in your logo, or use a set filter over photographs so that they all look similar. When you follow these steps, clients will be more drawn towards your socials as they look well thought out and professional. As a result, they are more likely to follow the account and make a purchase.
Be consistent
The stronger online presence your brand has, the more likely you are to succeed financially. One way to increase a presence is to be consistent within your posting. You should not post more than once a day (except for Instagram stories) and you should try to stick to a regular posting schedule. When you are inactive, you are likely to lose followers. Plan for the kind of content you want to produce and schedule to go out ahead of time.
Pay attention to analytics
The best way to understand whether or not your social media marketing campaign is working is through investing in marketing software . Software, provided by companies such as VisualVistor, will allow you to find out more about your clients. Whenever they open your website, phone your hotline, or make a purchase – you will be able to find out where they found out about your company or what links they have clicked on. This means you can find out which of your social media pages has the best outreach/is bringing you the most traffic. As a result, you can adjust your spending accordingly – promoting the pages which get the most attention to drive sales even further.
Post Reviews
Marketing software also allows you to share customer reviews on your website or socials with just a click of a button. This is a great way of boosting your online presence and can draw in clients, especially if the reviews are particularly positive. Taking on feedback from your customers is also a great way to build trust with your customers it shows that you value their thoughts/opinions.
Interact with customers
When a customer or potential customer feels valued, they are more likely to make a purchaser or consider the brand again in the future. Therefore, you must use your social media to show your clients how much you value them. This can be as simple as replying to/liking comments or any tagged photographs, or uploading opinion polls for them to answer onto your stories. Staying connected with customers, especially during this time, is vital in succeeding in a technological world.