consciouslifenews--2020-12-20--A Quantum Experiment Suggests There’s No Such Thing As Objective Reality

Physicists have long suspected that quantum mechanics allows two observers to experience different , conflicting realities .
Now they ’ ve performed the first experiment that proves it .
Back in 1961 , the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Eugene Wigner outlined a thought experiment that demonstrated one of the lesser-known paradoxes of quantum mechanics .
The experiment shows how the strange nature of the universe allows two observers—say , Wigner and Wigner ’ s friend—to experience different realities .
Since then , physicists have used the “ Wigner ’ s Friend ” thought experiment to explore the nature of measurement and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exist .
That ’ s important because scientists carry out experiments to establish objective facts .
But if they experience different realities , the argument goes , how can they agree on what these facts might be ?
That ’ s provided some entertaining fodder for after-dinner conversation , but Wigner ’ s thought experiment has never been more than that—just a thought experiment .
Last year , however , physicists noticed that recent advances in quantum technologies have made it possible to reproduce the Wigner ’ s Friend test in a real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ought to be possible to create different realities and compare them in the lab to find out whether they can be reconciled .
And today , Massimiliano Proietti at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh and a few colleagues say they have performed this experiment for the first time : they have created different realities and compared them .
Their conclusion is that Wigner was correct—these realities can be made irreconcilable so that it is impossible to agree on objective facts about an experiment .
Wigner ’ s original thought experiment is straightforward in principle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ photon that , when measured , can have either a horizontal polarization or a vertical polarization .
But before the measurement , according to the laws of quantum mechanics , the photon exists in both polarization states at the same time—a so-called superposition .
Wigner imagined a friend in a different lab measuring the state of this photon and storing the result , while Wigner observed from afar .
Wigner has no information about his friend ’ s measurement and so is forced to assume that the photon and the measurement of it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outcomes of the experiment .
Wigner can even perform an experiment to determine whether this superposition exists or not .
This is a kind of interference experiment showing that the photon and the measurement are indeed in a superposition .
From Wigner ’ s point of view , this is a “ fact ” —the superposition exists .
And this fact suggests that a measurement can not have taken place .
But this is in stark contrast to the point of view of the friend , who has indeed measured the photon ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friend can even call Wigner and say the measurement has been done ( provided the outcome is not revealed ) .
So the two realities are at odds with each other .
“ This calls into question the objective status of the facts established by the two observers , ” say Proietti and co. That ’ s the theory , but last year Caslav Brukner , at the University of Vienna in Austria , came up with a way to re-create the Wigner ’ s Friend experiment in the lab by means of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the same time .
The breakthrough that Proietti and co have made is to carry this out .
“ In a state-of-the-art 6-photon experiment , we realize this extended Wigner ’ s friend scenario , ” they say .
They use these six entangled photons to create two alternate realities—one representing Wigner and one representing Wigner ’ s friend .
Wigner ’ s friend measures the polarization of a photon and stores the result .
Wigner then performs an interference measurement to determine if the measurement and the photon are in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ result .
It turns out that both realities can coexist even though they produce irreconcilable outcomes , just as Wigner predicted .
That raises some fascinating questions that are forcing physicists to reconsider the nature of reality .
The idea that observers can ultimately reconcile their measurements of some kind of fundamental reality is based on several assumptions .
The first is that universal facts actually exist and that observers can agree on them .
But there are other assumptions too .
One is that observers have the freedom to make whatever observations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the choices one observer make do not influence the choices other observers make—an assumption that physicists call locality .
If there is an objective reality that everyone can agree on , then these assumptions all hold .
But Proietti and co ’ s result suggests that objective reality does not exist .
In other words , the experiment suggests that one or more of the assumptions—the idea that there is a reality we can agree on , the idea that we have freedom of choice , or the idea of locality—must be wrong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way out for those hanging on to the conventional view of reality .
This is that there is some other loophole that the experimenters have overlooked .
Indeed , physicists have tried to close loopholes in similar experiments for years , although they concede that it may never be possible to close them all .
Nevertheless , the work has important implications for the work of scientists .
“ The scientific method relies on facts , established through repeated measurements and agreed upon universally , independently of who observed them , ” say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same paper , they undermine this idea , perhaps fatally .
The next step is to go further : to construct experiments creating increasingly bizarre alternate realities that can not be reconciled .
Where this will take us is anybody ’ s guess .
But Wigner , and his friend , would surely not be surprised .
Ref : arxiv.org/abs/1902.05080 : Experimental Rejection of Observer-Independence in the Quantum World Tags : `` featured , conflicting realities , featured , mysteries of quantum mechanics , objective reality , objective reality does n't exist , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , quantum mechanics consciousness , quantum mechanics.
, quantum physics , quantum physics and reality

| MIT Technology Review
Physicists have long suspected that quantum mechanics allows two observers to experience different, conflicting realities. Now they’ve performed the first experiment that proves it.
Back in 1961, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Eugene Wigner outlined a thought experiment that demonstrated one of the lesser-known paradoxes of quantum mechanics. The experiment shows how the strange nature of the universe allows two observers—say, Wigner and Wigner’s friend—to experience different realities.
Since then, physicists have used the “Wigner’s Friend” thought experiment to explore the nature of measurement and to argue over whether objective facts can exist. That’s important because scientists carry out experiments to establish objective facts. But if they experience different realities, the argument goes, how can they agree on what these facts might be?
That’s provided some entertaining fodder for after-dinner conversation, but Wigner’s thought experiment has never been more than that—just a thought experiment.
Last year, however, physicists noticed that recent advances in quantum technologies have made it possible to reproduce the Wigner’s Friend test in a real experiment. In other words, it ought to be possible to create different realities and compare them in the lab to find out whether they can be reconciled.
And today, Massimiliano Proietti at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh and a few colleagues say they have performed this experiment for the first time: they have created different realities and compared them. Their conclusion is that Wigner was correct—these realities can be made irreconcilable so that it is impossible to agree on objective facts about an experiment.
Wigner’s original thought experiment is straightforward in principle. It begins with a single polarized photon that, when measured, can have either a horizontal polarization or a vertical polarization. But before the measurement, according to the laws of quantum mechanics, the photon exists in both polarization states at the same time—a so-called superposition.
Wigner imagined a friend in a different lab measuring the state of this photon and storing the result, while Wigner observed from afar. Wigner has no information about his friend’s measurement and so is forced to assume that the photon and the measurement of it are in a superposition of all possible outcomes of the experiment.
Wigner can even perform an experiment to determine whether this superposition exists or not. This is a kind of interference experiment showing that the photon and the measurement are indeed in a superposition.
From Wigner’s point of view, this is a “fact”—the superposition exists. And this fact suggests that a measurement cannot have taken place.
But this is in stark contrast to the point of view of the friend, who has indeed measured the photon’s polarization and recorded it. The friend can even call Wigner and say the measurement has been done (provided the outcome is not revealed).
So the two realities are at odds with each other. “This calls into question the objective status of the facts established by the two observers,” say Proietti and co.
That’s the theory, but last year Caslav Brukner, at the University of Vienna in Austria, came up with a way to re-create the Wigner’s Friend experiment in the lab by means of techniques involving the entanglement of many particles at the same time.
The breakthrough that Proietti and co have made is to carry this out. “In a state-of-the-art 6-photon experiment, we realize this extended Wigner’s friend scenario,” they say.
They use these six entangled photons to create two alternate realities—one representing Wigner and one representing Wigner’s friend. Wigner’s friend measures the polarization of a photon and stores the result. Wigner then performs an interference measurement to determine if the measurement and the photon are in a superposition.
The experiment produces an unambiguous result. It turns out that both realities can coexist even though they produce irreconcilable outcomes, just as Wigner predicted.
That raises some fascinating questions that are forcing physicists to reconsider the nature of reality.
The idea that observers can ultimately reconcile their measurements of some kind of fundamental reality is based on several assumptions. The first is that universal facts actually exist and that observers can agree on them.
But there are other assumptions too. One is that observers have the freedom to make whatever observations they want. And another is that the choices one observer make do not influence the choices other observers make—an assumption that physicists call locality.
If there is an objective reality that everyone can agree on, then these assumptions all hold.
But Proietti and co’s result suggests that objective reality does not exist. In other words, the experiment suggests that one or more of the assumptions—the idea that there is a reality we can agree on, the idea that we have freedom of choice, or the idea of locality—must be wrong.
Of course, there is another way out for those hanging on to the conventional view of reality. This is that there is some other loophole that the experimenters have overlooked. Indeed, physicists have tried to close loopholes in similar experiments for years, although they concede that it may never be possible to close them all.
Nevertheless, the work has important implications for the work of scientists. “The scientific method relies on facts, established through repeated measurements and agreed upon universally, independently of who observed them,” say Proietti and co. And yet in the same paper, they undermine this idea, perhaps fatally.
The next step is to go further: to construct experiments creating increasingly bizarre alternate realities that cannot be reconciled. Where this will take us is anybody’s guess. But Wigner, and his friend, would surely not be surprised.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1902.05080 : Experimental Rejection of Observer-Independence in the Quantum World
By Emerging Technology from the arXiv


consciouslifenews--2020-12-20--PDFBear: Your Reliable Instant Solution To Edit PDF

In handling work or official documentation , it will always encounter vital files with confidential information .
Most of the time , the files get converted into their secured form .
In filing these documents through a computer , it will need a reliable application to protect it from any unauthorized access .
It is the main reason why these documents are in the form of PDF .
Once a file gets modified to this format , an encrypted password gets applied .
Moreover , the challenge comes when there is a need to revise details from the PDF file @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explored because of its assistance in finding solutions and processes to achieve these untimely edits .
Edit PDF File On The Go With the demand for office reports , it is often an encounter of untimely revisions .
With the past face growth of technology , there are already quick solutions to edit PDF files .
We appreciate this online editing tool from PDFBear because the need to change or add will be fast since it gets done online .
Once there is an assurance of a good working internet connection wherever places @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand , the editing process will go smoothly since the changes can get done directly using hand-carried tablets and smartphones .
And even access through computers in the available offices or internet cafe in the designated areas .
The Step By Step Process Of Easy Edit Never think twice to seek the help of this online tool from PDFBear in your editing challenge of various PDF files .
The ingenuity of this system possesses a process that is smart and fast , and easy to comprehend .
It is a great help to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intelligent technology .
The step by step procedure will start with uploading first the file that needs to get edited .
Then proceed with putting this uploaded file to the PDF editor .
It serves as the editing area where the process of revisions and alterations will commence .
While this is ongoing , the user can now put drawings , create shapes , or write additional text .
Once the adjustments are made feasible to the needed revisions , click the button “ Apply ” .
Make sure to review the changes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shapes to the documents before clicking this applied button .
After doing so , the file is now ready to be saved and downloaded .
The usual harshness we get from all instant demand for work presentations is to get no other option but comply .
There is no excuse not to get any work done , even major or minor revisions .
With the aid of a perfect online tool like PDFBear , it will lessen an area to worry or get the slightest stress in getting any work done .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with its promise of fast edit .
Once users can try this tool from PDFBear , they will realize that revisions can be as easy as one , two , three .
There is no need to go on the hassle of installing additional software or puzzling the mind with configuration .
The users ' privacy to the files they are uploading for revisions will always be the topmost priority of PDFBear .
This online tool makes sure that users are not given even a single opportunity to worry about their files getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that will hamper the work and entail a loss of confidence in this kind of online tool .
The system of PDFBear uses encryption of 256-SSL to make sure that files uploaded are secure and safe .
It gives an assurance that the entire process is solely under the strict security of PDFBear .
In this way , they assure its users that only them and no one can access the whole process .
Less Time Consuming Edit With The Cloud With PDFBear working efficiently in the cloud , the user gets assured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PDF Editor .
It can be accessed anytime and anywhere , providing to lessen the hassle of consuming extra time to update and download additional software .
The fast-faced demand of work output can be made smooth as silk as meeting the needed work updates .
We can never compromise the output productivity at work because of hindrances like time , space , and location .
The constant presence of an updated version of PDFBear to edit PDF files instantly online provides its users to get assured with a fast solution and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the challenge .

In handling work or official documentation, it will always encounter vital files with confidential information. Most of the time, the files get converted into their secured form. In filing these documents through a computer, it will need a reliable application to protect it from any unauthorized access.
It is the main reason why these documents are in the form of PDF. Once a file gets modified to this format, an encrypted password gets applied. Moreover, the challenge comes when there is a need to revise details from the PDF file format. The beauty of PDFBear gets explored because of its assistance in finding solutions and processes to achieve these untimely edits.
Edit PDF File On The Go
With the demand for office reports, it is often an encounter of untimely revisions. With the past face growth of technology, there are already quick solutions to edit PDF files. We appreciate this online editing tool from PDFBear because the need to change or add will be fast since it gets done online.
Once there is an assurance of a good working internet connection wherever places you go. With this support on hand, the editing process will go smoothly since the changes can get done directly using hand-carried tablets and smartphones. And even access through computers in the available offices or internet cafe in the designated areas.
The Step By Step Process Of Easy Edit
Never think twice to seek the help of this online tool from PDFBear in your editing challenge of various PDF files. The ingenuity of this system possesses a process that is smart and fast, and easy to comprehend. It is a great help to users who are not well-versed with this intelligent technology.
The step by step procedure will start with uploading first the file that needs to get edited. Then proceed with putting this uploaded file to the PDF editor. It serves as the editing area where the process of revisions and alterations will commence. While this is ongoing, the user can now put drawings, create shapes, or write additional text.
Once the adjustments are made feasible to the needed revisions, click the button “Apply”. Make sure to review the changes or additional text, drawings, and shapes to the documents before clicking this applied button. After doing so, the file is now ready to be saved and downloaded.
Assured Quick Edit Of PDF File
The usual harshness we get from all instant demand for work presentations is to get no other option but comply. There is no excuse not to get any work done, even major or minor revisions. With the aid of a perfect online tool like PDFBear, it will lessen an area to worry or get the slightest stress in getting any work done.
The instant requirement to comply is assured assisted with its promise of fast edit. Once users can try this tool from PDFBear, they will realize that revisions can be as easy as one, two, three. There is no need to go on the hassle of installing additional software or puzzling the mind with configuration.
100% Assurance Of Security
The users' privacy to the files they are uploading for revisions will always be the topmost priority of PDFBear. This online tool makes sure that users are not given even a single opportunity to worry about their files getting corrupted or any form of unauthorized access that will hamper the work and entail a loss of confidence in this kind of online tool.
The system of PDFBear uses encryption of 256-SSL to make sure that files uploaded are secure and safe. It gives an assurance that the entire process is solely under the strict security of PDFBear. In this way, they assure its users that only them and no one can access the whole process.
Less Time Consuming Edit With The Cloud
With PDFBear working efficiently in the cloud, the user gets assured of a highly updated version of its PDF Editor. It can be accessed anytime and anywhere, providing to lessen the hassle of consuming extra time to update and download additional software. The fast-faced demand of work output can be made smooth as silk as meeting the needed work updates.
Takeaway
We can never compromise the output productivity at work because of hindrances like time, space, and location. The constant presence of an updated version of PDFBear to edit PDF files instantly online provides its users to get assured with a fast solution and a reliable and accurate online tool to beat the challenge.


consciouslifenews--2020-12-21--Scientists Think They’ve Detected Radio Emissions from an Alien World

The astronomers behind the new research used a radio telescope in the Netherlands to study three different stars known to host exoplanets .
The researchers compared what they saw to observations of Jupiter , diluted as if being seen from a star system dozens of light-years away .
And the one-star system stood out : Tau Boötes , which contains at least one exoplanet .
If the detection holds up , it could open the door to better understanding the magnetic fields of exoplanets and therefore the exoplanets themselves , the researchers hope .
“ We present one of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the radio realm , ” Jake Turner , an astronomer at Cornell University and lead author of the new research , said in a statement .
“ We make the case for emission by the planet itself .
From the strength and polarization of the radio signal and the planet 's magnetic field , it is compatible with theoretical predictions.
” However , Turner and his colleagues are n't yet positive that the signal they detected really is coming from the planet , dubbed Tau Boötes b ; the researchers called for additional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about 51 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Boötes .
The new research actually began at Jupiter ; the researchers had previously studied that planet 's radio emissions and then tweaked those measurements to reflect the effect they expected closeness to the host star and distance from Earth would have had on their observations of an exoplanet .
Then , the scientists consulted observations made in 2016 and 2017 by the Low-Frequency Array ( LOFAR ) in the Netherlands .
In addition to the potential signal from Tau Boötes b , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ picked up a signal from the star Upsilon Andromedae or its planet , but that detection was even fainter than the one from Tau Boötes b .
The researchers are interested in detecting radio emissions from planets because such information may help scientists decipher what 's happening in the same worlds ' magnetic fields .
Those magnetic fields , in turn , influence conditions on the surface of the planet — Earth 's magnetic field protects the atmosphere that makes the world one we can survive , for example .
Such magnetic fields @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a world , like its structure and history .
But so far , studying those magnetic fields directly has been difficult for scientists to manage , despite the fact that nearly every planet in our solar system has had one at some point in its history .
Hence the interest in using radio emissions as an intermediate .
“ We learned from our own Jupiter what this kind of detection looks like , ” Turner said .
“ We went searching for it and we found it.
” But that 's just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end of it , he emphasized , since the radio emissions could still be coming from the stars or another source instead of the planet .
“ There remains some uncertainty that the detected radio signal is from the planet .
The need for follow-up observations is critical.
” By Meghan Bartels / Senior Writer , Space.com Meghan Bartels graduated from Georgetown University with a major in classics and a minor in biology .
After college , she worked at a small environmental book publisher , where she learned that writing about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use sentences that include both nouns and verbs .
She also enjoys learning about history , drinking tea , and cheering on the Georgetown men ’ s basketball team .
Tags : `` featured , alien contact , alien exoplanet , alien world , earth-like exoplanets , exoplanet clouds , featured , Hot Jupiter exoplanets , magnetic fields , message from an alien world , radio emissions from an alien world , radio telescope

The astronomers behind the new research used a radio telescope in the Netherlands to study three different stars known to host exoplanets. The researchers compared what they saw to observations of Jupiter, diluted as if being seen from a star system dozens of light-years away. And the one-star system stood out: Tau Boötes, which contains at least one exoplanet. If the detection holds up, it could open the door to better understanding the magnetic fields of exoplanets and therefore the exoplanets themselves, the researchers hope.
“We present one of the first hints of detecting an exoplanet in the radio realm,” Jake Turner, an astronomer at Cornell University and lead author of the new research, said in a statement. “We make the case for emission by the planet itself. From the strength and polarization of the radio signal and the planet's magnetic field, it is compatible with theoretical predictions.”
However, Turner and his colleagues aren't yet positive that the signal they detected really is coming from the planet, dubbed Tau Boötes b; the researchers called for additional observations of the system, which is about 51 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Boötes.
The new research actually began at Jupiter; the researchers had previously studied that planet's radio emissions and then tweaked those measurements to reflect the effect they expected closeness to the host star and distance from Earth would have had on their observations of an exoplanet.
Then, the scientists consulted observations made in 2016 and 2017 by the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR) in the Netherlands. In addition to the potential signal from Tau Boötes b, the researchers also report that they may have picked up a signal from the star Upsilon Andromedae or its planet, but that detection was even fainter than the one from Tau Boötes b.
The researchers are interested in detecting radio emissions from planets because such information may help scientists decipher what's happening in the same worlds' magnetic fields. Those magnetic fields, in turn, influence conditions on the surface of the planet — Earth's magnetic field protects the atmosphere that makes the world one we can survive, for example. Such magnetic fields can also tell scientists about other qualities of a world, like its structure and history.
But so far, studying those magnetic fields directly has been difficult for scientists to manage, despite the fact that nearly every planet in our solar system has had one at some point in its history. Hence the interest in using radio emissions as an intermediate.
“We learned from our own Jupiter what this kind of detection looks like,” Turner said. “We went searching for it and we found it.”
But that's just the beginning of the story, not the end of it, he emphasized, since the radio emissions could still be coming from the stars or another source instead of the planet. “There remains some uncertainty that the detected radio signal is from the planet. The need for follow-up observations is critical.”
By Meghan Bartels / Senior Writer, Space.com
Meghan Bartels graduated from Georgetown University with a major in classics and a minor in biology. After college, she worked at a small environmental book publisher, where she learned that writing about science is fun when you get to use sentences that include both nouns and verbs. She also enjoys learning about history, drinking tea, and cheering on the Georgetown men’s basketball team.
@meghanbartels


consciouslifenews--2020-12-21--Seeing Beauty in Everything | Eckhart Tolle Teachings

FAIR USE NOTICE .
Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues , human rights , economic and political democracy , and issues of social justice .
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use ' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news reporting , teaching , scholarship , and research .
If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use ' ... you must obtain permission from the copyright owner .
And , if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed , let us know via the `` Contact Us '' link at the top of the site , and we will promptly remove it .
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for professional advice of any kind .
Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material .
Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms .
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors .
No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied .

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.


consciouslifenews--2020-12-21--Christ Consciousness, The Hope for Humanity

As many celebrate or acknowledge the birth of the Christed One , Jesus .
May His words resonate within you .
“ I leave the gift of peace with you—my peace .
Not the kind of fragile peace given by the world , but my perfect peace .
Don ’ t yield to fear or be troubled in your hearts—instead , be courageous !
John 14:27 , PTP* In his human life , Jesus represented a Spirit , an Energy that is within all of humankind .
It lies dormant until personally activated .
The activation is by individual recognition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Sadly , the message of Jesus has been watered down from his original Aramaic .
As a very deep , rich language , it crosses the borders of the intellect straight into the heart .
Also , lost along the way was the Divine Feminine aspect of Christ consciousness .
As this was thwarted our minds became enslaved to systems and beliefs that would keep us weak and with a feeling of powerlessness .
The best part is , as Christed humans , that is humans that hold Christ consciousness within , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are champions winning and lovers loving .
We are beautiful beings shining light in dark places .
As we embody these truths we rise above the narrative of the day to fulfill our God given right of justice and good for ALL .
As compassionate beings we tear down judgement systems and victim mentalities by supporting what is true , right and honorable .
This is the hope we seek , we know and feel .
It is within us , waiting to be lit and shared .
May you be aware and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this is Christ Consciousness , the hope for humanity .
Peace be with you always .
❤Julia *TPT , The Passion Translation , uses transliterations from original Hebrew , Aramaic and Greek .
The purpose of the Passion Translation is to reintroduce the passion and fire of the Bible to the English reader .
It doesn ’ t merely convey the literal meaning of words .
It expresses God ’ s passion for people and his world by translating the original , life-changing message of God ’ s Word for modern readers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Counselor with an emphasis on the intersection of science and the sacred .
She writes from experiences and transformative understandings that have led her to an authentic and peaceful life .
She goes by these names : wife , daughter , grandmother , mother , sister , aunt , niece , cousin , and friend .
As home educator of her three children , she also developed/ran cafes , and maintained various leadership roles within her community .
Her greatest desire is to encourage others to live life fully .
Her passions are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and trail blazing .
She is happily married in Western North Carolina .

Many terms apply to a similar state. The resonance of a high frequency that impacts you and the world around you. Some may call it higher consciousness or Christ consciousness. At this time as we see and hear the words, Merry Christmas, remember Jesus lived a human life in the state of extremely high awareness and taught how we can do the same.
As many celebrate or acknowledge the birth of the Christed One, Jesus. May His words resonate within you.
“I leave the gift of peace with you—my peace. Not the kind of fragile peace given by the world, but my perfect peace. Don’t yield to fear or be troubled in your hearts—instead, be courageous! John 14:27, TPT*
In his human life, Jesus represented a Spirit, an Energy that is within all of humankind. It lies dormant until personally activated. The activation is by individual recognition, resulting in a great awakening within.
Sadly, the message of Jesus has been watered down from his original Aramaic. As a very deep, rich language, it crosses the borders of the intellect straight into the heart. Also, lost along the way was the Divine Feminine aspect of Christ consciousness. As this was thwarted our minds became enslaved to systems and beliefs that would keep us weak and with a feeling of powerlessness.
The best part is, as Christed humans, that is humans that hold Christ consciousness within, we are more than conquerors. We are champions winning and lovers loving. We are beautiful beings shining light in dark places. As we embody these truths we rise above the narrative of the day to fulfill our God given right of justice and good for ALL. As compassionate beings we tear down judgement systems and victim mentalities by supporting what is true, right and honorable.
This is the hope we seek, we know and feel. It is within us, waiting to be lit and shared. May you be aware and alive to Christ within you, for this is Christ Consciousness, the hope for humanity. Peace be with you always. ❤Julia
*TPT, The Passion Translation, uses transliterations from original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. The purpose of the Passion Translation is to reintroduce the passion and fire of the Bible to the English reader. It doesn’t merely convey the literal meaning of words. It expresses God’s passion for people and his world by translating the original, life-changing message of God’s Word for modern readers.
Julia Parsell is a Certified Holistic Health Counselor with an emphasis on the intersection of science and the sacred. She writes from experiences and transformative understandings that have led her to an authentic and peaceful life. She goes by these names: mother, grandmother, sister, aunt, niece, cousin, and friend. As home educator of her three children, she also developed/ran cafes, and maintained various leadership roles within her community. Her greatest desire is to encourage others to live life fully. Her passions are family, art creation, writing, and trail blazing. She loves her life in Western North Carolina.


consciouslifenews--2020-12-21--2020 Taught the World to have Gratitude for Love

When we look back on the past year , we will undoubtedly remember it as the “ year of the pandemic.
” And all the painful associations that we have had with 2020 will be relived again in stories told to future generations who are too young to recall the tragic loss of life , challenging periods of social isolation , and crushing poverty caused by COVID-19 .
In addition to all the world ’ s suffering , we will also remember this year for the utter lack of compassion exhibited by such world leaders as America ’ s Donald @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Johnson , and Brazil ’ s Jair Bolsonaro in response to the crisis .
We will also associate 2020 with long-standing racial tensions that boiled over , billionaires who turned record profits , and ballooning cases of mental health issues .
However , despite all the real pain that this pandemic has visited upon the world , this year in passing will also be remembered for something that many news outlets have overlooked altogether : a renewed gratitude for the power of love .
More now than in past years , the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a mystical force so profound that it can transform us from the inside out .
Something remarkable has begun to take root through our shared experience of isolation .
A growing realization that we truly need one another has transformed from a concept that we occasionally waxed poetic about before the pandemic , to a living truth that we have only now begun to discover within ourselves since .
In my own life , I have come to realize just how wildly peculiar it is that it literally took a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reach back out to dear friends with who I had lost touch .
In 2020 , I have reconnected with more people through the phone than in any other year I can recall .
The past year has had the effect of re-awakening a profound sense of gratitude for all the wonderful beings in my life .
The circumstances of the past year have also confirmed for me an important truth that the Christian mystic Thomas Merton wrote about in his contemplations on solitude : No man is an island .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everything that we westerners are taught to believe .
Particularly in nations like the United States , where the value of rugged individualism is extolled , the mere mention of our intrinsic connection threatens to dissolve the illusion of separateness that the fabric of this civilization is built upon .
To acknowledge that “ no man is an island ” is to admit that we really are our brothers and sisters ’ keepers .
Undoubtedly , a renewed awareness of this sacred soul connection we all share is the greatest gift that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day soon , the dust will settle , and we will be able to gather once more in song and dance , dine together again in proximity , and embrace complete strangers ( though in a cosmic sense are any of us even strangers ? )
with a handshake or hug .
When that day comes , let us remember those difficult moments when we struggled in isolation and dreamed of how wonderful it would be to reunite with beloved friends and family in person .
May we never again take the power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a writer , teacher , and speaker who lives in the beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina .
His forthcoming book , , will be published in February 2021 and will be available on Amazon .
You can connect with Forrest via email : forrestrivers4 @ gmail .
Tags : `` featured , coronavirus lessons , COVID-19 and Humanity ’ s Spiritual Awakening , COVID-19 pandemic , featured , gratitude for love , lessons from 2020 , lessons from COVID-19 , power of love , the secret power of love

By Forrest Rivers
When we look back on the past year, we will undoubtedly remember it as the “year of the pandemic.” And all the painful associations that we have had with 2020 will be relived again in stories told to future generations who are too young to recall the tragic loss of life, challenging periods of social isolation, and crushing poverty caused by COVID-19. In addition to all the world’s suffering, we will also remember this year for the utter lack of compassion exhibited by such world leaders as America’s Donald Trump, Great Britain’s Boris Johnson, and Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro in response to the crisis. We will also associate 2020 with long-standing racial tensions that boiled over, billionaires who turned record profits, and ballooning cases of mental health issues.
However, despite all the real pain that this pandemic has visited upon the world, this year in passing will also be remembered for something that many news outlets have overlooked altogether: a renewed gratitude for the power of love. More now than in past years, the world is beginning to reawaken to the spirit of a mystical force so profound that it can transform us from the inside out. Something remarkable has begun to take root through our shared experience of isolation. A growing realization that we truly need one another has transformed from a concept that we occasionally waxed poetic about before the pandemic, to a living truth that we have only now begun to discover within ourselves since.
In my own life, I have come to realize just how wildly peculiar it is that it literally took a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic for me to gather up the courage to reach back out to dear friends with who I had lost touch. In 2020, I have reconnected with more people through the phone than in any other year I can recall. The past year has had the effect of re-awakening a profound sense of gratitude for all the wonderful beings in my life. The circumstances of the past year have also confirmed for me an important truth that the Christian mystic Thomas Merton wrote about in his contemplations on solitude: No man is an island. This powerful realization, alone, contradicts almost everything that we westerners are taught to believe.
Particularly in nations like the United States, where the value of rugged individualism is extolled, the mere mention of our intrinsic connection threatens to dissolve the illusion of separateness that the fabric of this civilization is built upon. To acknowledge that “no man is an island” is to admit that we really are our brothers and sisters’ keepers. Undoubtedly, a renewed awareness of this sacred soul connection we all share is the greatest gift that this pandemic has bestowed on humanity. One day soon, the dust will settle, and we will be able to gather once more in song and dance, dine together again in proximity, and embrace complete strangers (though in a cosmic sense are any of us even strangers?) with a handshake or hug. When that day comes, let us remember those difficult moments when we struggled in isolation and dreamed of how wonderful it would be to reunite with beloved friends and family in person.
May we never again take the power of love for granted.
Om Shanti. (peace)
Forrest Rivers is a writer, teacher, and speaker who lives in the beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. His forthcoming book, COVID-19 and Humanity’s Spiritual Awakening, will be published in February 2021 and will be available on Amazon. You can connect with Forrest via email: forrestrivers4@gmail.


consciouslifenews--2020-12-21--COVID-19 Testing Scandal Deepens

COVID-19 Testing Scandal Deepens

The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists , not the viral isolate .
Missing genetic code was simply made up Florida recently became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests The tests have exceptionally high false result rates .
The higher the cycle threshold ( CT ) — i.e.
, the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive .
Beyond 34 cycles , your chance of a positive PCR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ zero PCR tests can not distinguish between “ live ” viruses and inactive ( noninfectious ) viral particles and therefore can not be used as a diagnostic tool .
They also can not confirm that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test can not rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal Positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction ( RT-PCR ) tests have been used as the justification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ locked down for the past nine months .
Not reliable hospitalization or death rates ; just positive PCR test numbers — a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness — are the triggers behind the shutdowns .
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal .
Why ?
Because we ’ re now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful , at least not when they ’ re used as they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tests Are the Wrong Tool to Assess Pandemic Threat We now know that PCR tests : 1.
Can not distinguish between “ live ” viruses and inactive ( noninfectious ) viral particles and therefore can not be used as a diagnostic tool — For this reason , it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a “ COVID-19 case.
” As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness1 lecture , featured in “ How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible , ” media and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflated “ cases ” or positive tests with the actual illness .
Medically speaking , a “ case ” refers to a sick person .
It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness .
Now all of a sudden , this well-established medical term , “ case , ” has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA .
As noted by Merritt , “ That is not epidemiology .
That ’ s a fraud.
” 2.
Can not confirm that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ symptoms as the test can not rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens .
3.Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of 2019-nCoV infection .
4.Have exceptionally high false result rates — The higher the cycle threshold ( CT ) — i.e.
, the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive .
While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable,2,3,4 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45 .
These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread ( pandemic ) infection when infection rates are in fact low .
The CT Is the Key to the Pandemic Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times , which results in healthy people testing “ positive ” for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks .
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended .
An April 2020 study6 in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100 % confirmed real positives , the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles .
Above 17 cycles , accuracy drops dramatically .
By the time you get to 33 cycles , the accuracy rate is a mere 20 % , meaning 80 % are false positives .
Beyond 34 cycles , your chance of a positive PCR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ zero , as illustrated in the following graph from that study.7 By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles , you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak , and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on .
Percentage of the positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients , according to Ct value ( plain line ) .
The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve .
More recently , a December 3 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies — all of which were published in 2020 — comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing .
They also looked at the timing of the test , and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results .
As reported by the authors : In other words , if you have symptoms of COVID-19 , by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms , the chances of you spreading it to others start to decline , and in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be infectious even if you still test positive .
This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. As noted by the authors:9 Live Virus Unlikely in Tests Using CT Above 24 According to The New York Times,10 researchers have been “ unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27 , ” and if the virus can not replicate , you will not get ill and are not infectious , so you can not spread it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ review11 confirms this .
Under the heading “ The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2 , ” 12 they point out that “ significantly lower ” CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients .
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24 .
What ’ s more , in order to produce a live virus culture , a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clarify , if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher , then you are likely to be infected and infectious .
However , if you do not have symptoms , yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher , then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you ’ re unlikely to carry any live virus .
In fact , provided you ’ re asymptomatic , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher .
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters .
According to the authors:13 Another scientific review14,15 that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv on September 29 , 2020 .
Fourteen studies were included in this review .
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80 % chance of getting an accurate PCR result .
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil .
Now , these are symptomatic people .
When you ’ re asymptomatic , your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent .
The graph below , from one of the studies16 included in the review ( Bullard et .
al . )
, illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious ( having @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used and the timing of the test .
As explained by the review authors:17 Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives , they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they ’ re reporting .
Fortunately , that ’ s about to change in Florida , which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests.18 The Florida Health Department issued the order on December 3 , 2020 , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reporting rule within seven days.19 This could prove quite interesting , especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold .
Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns .
In related news , an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled20,21 that the PCR test is “ not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2 ” and that “ a single positive PCR test can not be used as an effective diagnosis of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quarantine based on the results is unlawful.
” 22 The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty .
The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive .
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case , including a September 28 , 2020 , study23 in Clinical Infectious Diseases , which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resulting in a 97 % false-positive rate .
The court ruled that , based on the science presented , any PCR test using a CT over 25 is unreliable .
Fatal Errors Found in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine .
November 30 , 2020 , the scientific paper24 describing the workflow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection — which was quickly accepted as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world — was challenged25 by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to “ fatal errors.
” 26 The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten , Ph.D. , a German virologist , and Victor Corman , who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology .
According to Reiner Fuellmich,27 founding members of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee ( Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,28 or ACU ) ,29,30 Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax .
One of the key “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that they wrote it — and developed the PCR test — before there was any viral isolate available .
All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020 .
Interestingly , the paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted , which suggests it wasn ’ t even peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world .
Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett , Ph.D. , one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper ’ s retraction , who stated:31 The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a November 20 , 2020 , study32 in Nature Communications , which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases .
The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan , China , who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1 , 2020 .
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms .
Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19 , 107 tested positive a second time .
Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive ( either for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ live virus was found .
A number of experts have now come forward , calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing .
Aside from this testing data , there ’ s no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all .
While there is such a thing as COVID-19 , and people have and do die from it , there are no excess deaths due to it.33,34,35 In other words , the total mortality for 2020 is normal .
The pandemic has not killed more people than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from something , anything — anyway .
So , unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease , diabetes , cancer , the flu , or anything else , then there ’ s no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19 .
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world .
Fuellmich and his ACU legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for what you can do in the meantime , consider : •Turning off mainstream media news and turning to independent experts — Do the research .
Read through science .
•Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions — The more questions are asked , the more answers will come to light .
Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing , so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn ’ t a pandemic anymore .
•If you are a medical professional , especially if you ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , write an open letter to your government , urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts .
•Sign The Great Barrington Declaration,36 which calls for an end to lockdowns .
•Join a group so that you can have support .
Examples of groups formed to fight against government overreach include : ◦Us for Them , a group campaigning for reopening schools and protecting children ’ s rights in the U.K. ◦The Freedom to Breathe Agency , a U.S. team of attorneys , doctors , business owners , and parents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ liberty

By Dr. Joseph Mercola | mercola.com
The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists, not the viral isolate. Missing genetic code was simply made up
Florida recently became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests
The tests have exceptionally high false result rates. The higher the cycle threshold (CT) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test is a true positive shrink to zero
PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. They also cannot confirm that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal
Positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down for the past nine months. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers — a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness — are the triggers behind the shutdowns.
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal. Why? Because we’re now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they’re used as they have been so far.
Why PCR Tests Are the Wrong Tool to Assess Pandemic Threat
We now know that PCR tests:
1.Cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool — For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a “COVID-19 case.” As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness1 lecture, featured in “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible,” media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness. Medically speaking, a “case” refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, “case,” has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, “That is not epidemiology. That’s a fraud.” 2.Cannot confirm that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. 3.Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. 4.Have exceptionally high false result rates — The higher the cycle threshold (CT) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable,2,3,4 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40.5 Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.
The CT Is the Key to the Pandemic
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing “positive” for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test is a true positive shrink to zero.
An April 2020 study6 in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test is a true positive shrink to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study.7
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
Percentage of the positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
Scientific Review Confirms PCR Flaws
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review8 published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies — all of which were published in 2020 — comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing. They also looked at the timing of the test, and how symptom severity relates to PCR test results. As reported by the authors:
“The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (CT) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that CT values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture.
Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads …”
In other words, if you have symptoms of COVID-19, by Day 8 from the onset of symptoms, the chances of you spreading it to others start to decline, and in the days following, you are unlikely to be infectious even if you still test positive. This is particularly true if the PCR test is using a higher than ideal CT. As noted by the authors:9
“Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential.”
Live Virus Unlikely in Tests Using CT Above 24
According to The New York Times,10 researchers have been “unable to grow the coronavirus out of samples from volunteers whose PCR tests had CT values above 27,” and if the virus cannot replicate, you will not get ill and are not infectious, so you cannot spread it to others.
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review11 confirms this. Under the heading “The Relationship Between RT-PCR Results and Viral Culture of SARS-CoV-2,”12 they point out that “significantly lower” CTs were used in studies that correctly identified infectious patients.
Five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 24. What’s more, in order to produce a live virus culture, a patient whose PCR test used a CT at or above 35 had to be symptomatic.
So, to clarify, if you have symptoms of COVID-19 and test positive using a PCR test that was run at 35 amplification cycles or higher, then you are likely to be infected and infectious.
However, if you do not have symptoms, yet test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to others as you’re unlikely to carry any live virus. In fact, provided you’re asymptomatic, you’re unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher.
Timing of PCR Test Also Matters
The Clinical Infectious Diseases review also confirmed that the timing of the test matters. According to the authors:13
“… there appears to be a time window during which RNA detection is at its highest with low cycle threshold and higher possibility of culturing a live virus, with viral load and probability of growing live virus of SARS-CoV2 …
We propose that further work should be done on this with the aim of constructing an algorithm for integrating the results of PCR with other variables, to increase the effectiveness of detecting infectious patients.”
Another scientific review14,15 that looked into how the timing of the test influences results and your risk of being infectious was posted on the preprint server medRxiv on September 29, 2020. Fourteen studies were included in this review.
The data show that your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of COVID-19 symptom onset are only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result.
By Day 5 the accuracy shrinks considerably and by Day 8 the accuracy is nil. Now, these are symptomatic people. When you’re asymptomatic, your odds of a positive PCR test being accurate is virtually nonexistent.
The graph below, from one of the studies16 included in the review (Bullard et. al.), illustrates the probability of a patient being infectious (having live virus) based on the CT used and the timing of the test. As explained by the review authors:17
“The figure … shows how the probability of SARS-CoV-2 infectious virus is greater (the red bars) when the cycle threshold is lower (the blue line) and when symptoms to test time is shorter — beyond 8 days, no live virus was detected.”
Florida to Require Disclosure of CT Data
Even though health authorities know that high CTs result in high rates of false positives, they do not specify the CT used for the PCR tests they’re reporting. Fortunately, that’s about to change in Florida, which just became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests.18
The Florida Health Department issued the order on December 3, 2020, and labs must comply with the new mandatory reporting rule within seven days.19
This could prove quite interesting, especially if the state health department decides to invalidate positive results obtained from tests run above a certain amplification threshold. Time will tell exactly how this reporting requirement might influence pandemic response measures such as mask mandates and lockdowns.
Portugal Rules Quarantine Based on PCR Results Is Unlawful
In related news, an appeals court in Portugal recently ruled20,21 that the PCR test is “not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.” Therefore, “any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful.”22
The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty. The case was brought by four German tourists who had been forced to self-quarantine after one of them tested positive.
Several scientific studies were brought forth as evidence in this case, including a September 28, 2020, study23 in Clinical Infectious Diseases, which found that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false-positive rate. The court ruled that, based on the science presented, any PCR test using a CT over 25 is unreliable.
Fatal Errors Found in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based
The Portuguese appeals court is not alone in its critique of the PCR test being used as the sole criteria for quarantine. November 30, 2020, the scientific paper24 describing the workflow of how to use the PCR test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection — which was quickly accepted as the standard by the WHO and applied across the world — was challenged25 by 22 international scientists who demand that the paper be retracted due to “fatal errors.”26
The paper in question was written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., a German virologist, and Victor Corman, who heads a German working group on virus diagnostics and clinical virology. According to Reiner Fuellmich,27 founding members of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,28 or ACU),29,30 Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
One of the key “fatal errors” in the Corman-Drosten paper is that they wrote it — and developed the PCR test — before there was any viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
Interestingly, the paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted, which suggests it wasn’t even peer-reviewed before being embraced by the whole world. Undercover DC interviewed Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper’s retraction, who stated:31
“Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It’s like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
When Drosten developed the test, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence in a gene bank. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
In the fish market, it’s like giving you a few bones and saying ‘that’s your fish.’ It could be any fish … Listen, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a patient in it. It’s all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That’s what genetics is; it’s a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you’re missing some, what you think is EEE, so you put it in … This is basically a computer virus.
There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper … But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing. The PCR products of the amplification didn’t correspond to any viral isolate at that time. I call it ‘donut ring science.’ There is nothing at the center of it. It’s all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … where they said: ‘Here’s the viral isolate.’ Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who’d been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it’s all full of holes, the whole thing.”
No Viable Virus Found in Positive Cases
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study32 in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases. The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020.
A total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive a second time. Yet when they did virus cultures on these 407 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was found.
Expose the Fraud, End the Misery
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there’s no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it.33,34,35
In other words, the total mortality for 2020 is normal. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year — from something, anything — anyway. So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu, or anything else, then there’s no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19.
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. Fuellmich and his ACU legal team are leading that charge. As for what you can do in the meantime, consider:


consciouslifenews--2020-12-21--What Are the Benefits of Providing Your Employees With the Right Tools?

One of the most important elements of getting any job done is having the right tools to do it .
When you are an employer , one of your biggest responsibilities is to provide your team with the tools they need .
After all , the old saying goes that you ’ re only as good as your tools , so ensuring that your employees have what they need is clearly going to help both you and them massively .
Even if it means spending more money or taking more time out of the business to train your team how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worth it .
Read on to find out exactly what some of the benefits of providing your employees with the right tools are .
One of the major benefits of having the right tools in your workplace and ensuring that your team knows how to use them , is that it will make your business more efficient .
When your employees don ’ t have the right tools , they have to make do with what they do have , and this can lead to slower working and low productivity , especially if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get creative with aren ’ t even made for the job at hand .
By giving them the right tools , whether that ’ s large pieces of machinery like or a small piece of equipment like a specific kind of screwdriver , the workers can focus on what they are doing , and will get a lot more done .
As an employer , you have a responsibility to keep your employees safe .
By giving them the right tools for their work , you are fulfilling that duty and making your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extends beyond the tools themselves and also takes into account proper training so the equipment is used correctly , and PPE so that the employee can protect themselves where necessary .
Workplace injuries can be very expensive for businesses to deal with , but on top of the expense – and more pressing for many – is the fact that someone has been hurt .
Whether an employee , a member of the public , or a visitor to the workplace of some sort , if that accident could have been avoided by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use , then this is what must be done .
We did indeed mention earlier how it might cost more to buy the correct equipment for your employees , especially when you factor in the training needed to be safe around these tools .
However , in the long term providing your employees with the right equipment so they can do their jobs efficiently could be money-saving .
If someone is injured because their tools are incorrect , this will cost you more on .
If a job is not completed on time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this will lower your profits ( the same is true if you are producing lower quality work ) .
If your employees only do the bare minimum for you because they don ’ t feel you appreciate them or listen to them about what they need , you ’ ll be much less productive overall .
By providing the right tools , you can make your business much more successful , and make more money overall .

One of the most important elements of getting any job done is having the right tools to do it. When you are an employer, one of your biggest responsibilities is to provide your team with the tools they need. After all, the old saying goes that you’re only as good as your tools, so ensuring that your employees have what they need is clearly going to help both you and them massively.
Even if it means spending more money or taking more time out of the business to train your team how to use those tools, it is worth it. Read on to find out exactly what some of the benefits of providing your employees with the right tools are.
More Efficiency
One of the major benefits of having the right tools such as CNC precision machining in your workplace and ensuring that your team knows how to use them, is that it will make your business more efficient. When your employees don’t have the right tools, they have to make do with what they do have, and this can lead to slower working and low productivity, especially if the tools they are being forced to get creative with aren’t even made for the job at hand.
By giving them the right tools, whether that’s large pieces of machinery like conveyors or a small piece of equipment like a specific kind of screwdriver, the workers can focus on what they are doing, and will get a lot more done.
A Safer Workplace
As an employer, you have a responsibility to keep your employees safe. By giving them the right tools for their work, you are fulfilling that duty and making your workplace a much safer one. This extends beyond the tools themselves and also takes into account proper training so the equipment is used correctly, and PPE so that the employee can protect themselves where necessary.
Workplace injuries can be very expensive for businesses to deal with, but on top of the expense – and more pressing for many – is the fact that someone has been hurt. Whether an employee, a member of the public, or a visitor to the workplace of some sort, if that accident could have been avoided by giving your team the correct tools to use, then this is what must be done.
Money-Saving
We did indeed mention earlier how it might cost more to buy the correct equipment for your employees, especially when you factor in the training needed to be safe around these tools. However, in the long term providing your employees with the right equipment so they can do their jobs efficiently could be money-saving.
If someone is injured because their tools are incorrect, this will cost you more on your insurance premiums . If a job is not completed on time because the tools aren’t right, this will lower your profits (the same is true if you are producing lower quality work). If your employees only do the bare minimum for you because they don’t feel you appreciate them or listen to them about what they need, you’ll be much less productive overall.
By providing the right tools, you can make your business much more successful, and make more money overall.


consciouslifenews--2020-12-22--The Importance of Solitude and Meditation

“ Nature has neither core nor skin : she ’ s both at once outside and in.
” –Johann Wolfgang von Goethe “ A wise person is full of questions .
A dull person is full of answers.
” –Paulo Coelho “ Solitude is not an absence of energy or action , as some belief , but is rather a boon of wild provisions transmitted to us from the soul .
Purposeful solitude is both palliative and preventative .
It is used to prevent fatigue and weariness.
” –Clarissa Pinkola Estes Consider the double meaning of the word , signifying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of awe .
What is it about a door opening that so piques our curiosity ?
Is it the child inside us yearning for novelty and entertainment ?
Is it equal-parts fear and fascination ?
It ’ s almost as though we to be moved .
And in order to move , we must “ open the door ” into the ( the awe-inspiring , mesmerizing mystery ) .
With closed doors there is no view , there ’ s no movement , but for the same old static motions of old .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a chance for reanimation .
There is a new “ way ” to go , a new to juggle .
There is –hallelujah– something altogether new to be enchanted by .
Solitude as meditation is the preeminent psychological entrance , the perennial crossroads , the existential gap .
It can be an exponentially progressive spiral –a place where all roads begin and all roads end , where all doors open and all doors close .
In order to arrive there , all one needs is to be awake and alone enough to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Being alone in nature is important .
Nature deprivation is overly rampant in the everyday click and hum of modern-day life .
Solitude allows us to reconnect with the sacred .
We are free to leave behind the hare-brained ferocity of civilization with the tortoise-mind serenity of nature .
Just as we take the world into our bodies , in the form of food , should we not dive deep into the world and let it swallow us , in the form of solitude ?
In this way , through the two-way mirror @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world .
We eat the world for sustenance and then we balance the cycle by allowing the world to “ eat ” us in recompense .
This is the epitome of expiation ; the pinnacle of cosmic respect .
It is during meditation and solitude where we are free to face our shadow , our : “ black beast.
” It is here where we are allowed to wrestle with our doubt , with the arbitrariness of self .
The black beast is the hungry ghost inside us all .
But it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , an unconscious beast that just needs to be thrown a bone .
And it is up to us , and only us , to feed it .
In the process of “ feeding ” it , we discover that our fear dissipates .
The ghost becomes Casper-like , friendly , and championing us in our cause .
It becomes puppy-like and grows up to be our best friend , standing by our side until the end .
However , feeding the beast is no easy task .
For is it not when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billion blinking machines and distanced from the billion hollering mouths of men , that we feel the awesome weight of time upon our shoulders and the mercurial ache of loneliness in our heart ?
Indeed , but this is no time for self-pity .
This is a time to fill in the blind spot .
This is a time to embrace despair , rather than dally with minimalizing it and pigeonholing it into a subordinate emotion .
Our despair is paramount and must be allowed its space , lest we fool ourselves into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is in the act of embracing despair that we discover true hope .
Not a childish hope or an immature gamble , but rather a rediscovery of innocence in the face of death .
It is a mature gambol , allowing for the cosmos to be as it is : impermanent and thereby meaningful and beautiful .
“ Man , ” said Blaise Pascal , “ is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges as the infinity in which he is engulfed.
” But when we embrace our own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our third eye opens .
From this new we are able to see the nothingness for what it is , just as we are able to feel the infinity in which we are engulfed .
We realize that , out there in the “ great loneliness , ” though we are just a mere grain of sand in an endless desert , we give that desert meaning simply by perceiving it .
And suddenly we are not so small .
We are each of us a microcosm within a macrocosm .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can no more separate the micro from the macro than we can the human from the natural .
Both are needed to put the whole holistic .
If we live too long without giving recognition to our despair , to our eternal suffering , we risk turning our lives and our reality into a bureaucracy .
It is only in suffering our smallness that we can actualize our greatness and finally accept that our mere presence , albeit minuscule and a mere flash in the pan compared to the greater infinity , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cosmos .
Solitude and meditation , especially upon suffering and despair , turns the tables on the universe ; where instead of trying to possess our life , we are possessed by it .
Like Kierkegaard said , “ The pupil of possibility receives infinity.
” In our inert world , where spiritual disorientation and groundlessness prevail , we are crippled by the great crisis of modernity : disenchantment .
We try in vain to force-feed enchantment to each other , through television , sports , and movies .
Our disenchantment , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of entertainment , but rather a lack of self-permeability , a lack of connection with the cosmos .
We are so ecologically impoverished that we experience a deep sense of alienation ; not only within society but within our own skin .
Meditating on “ the great loneliness , ” is an escape from this disenchantment .
It is a kind of reprieve from the spiritually estranged clockwork of society , a place where we can lose ourselves so as to be reoriented and grounded with the cosmos .
In a sense , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lost can never truly be found .
Losing oneself in solitude is a means to the end of finding oneself in meditation .
Fools do not strive for self-discovery because they are too self-centered and believe that they have all the answers .
The wise do not strive for self-discovery because they already have it .
It ’ s only the people in between –the majority– that are vulnerable and lost , drowning in the daunting eternity of it all .
Meditating in solitude brings forth the gift of feeling lost .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can we ascend to a state of being “ found , ” to becoming , once again , enchanted .
Enchantment develops when we are , all-at-once , trumped by , and triumphant over , the greater cosmos .
And then lost and re-found and lost again in the continuing cycle of the human leitmotif .
It is exactly this sense of inner-lost-and-found –this balance of self-exploration and self-negation– that keeps us adventurous , curious , and open to the many vicissitudes of life .
Indeed , it is this that transforms us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plasticity , and a hunger for the unknown .
Meditation and solitude are “ entrances ” into this hunger for the unknown .
If allowed infinite transgression hunger for the unknown eventually actualizes itself in the concept of fallibilism , where essentially there are no answers because even if there were they could always be questioned , .
Ascending to a state of being found in the realization that all things are infinitely unfounded , and all the more joyous and enchanting because of that fact .
Gary ‘ Z ’ McGee , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is the author of and .
His works are inspired by the great philosophers of the ages and his wide awake view of the modern world .
Tags : `` featured , featured , health benefits of meditation , how to create peace with solitude , importance of meditation , importance of solitude , the importance of meditation , the importance of solitude

By Gary ‘Z’ McGee | Waking Times
“Nature has neither core nor skin: she’s both at once outside and in.” –Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
“A wise person is full of questions. A dull person is full of answers.” –Paulo Coelho
“Solitude is not an absence of energy or action, as some belief, but is rather a boon of wild provisions transmitted to us from the soul. Purposeful solitude is both palliative and preventative. It is used to prevent fatigue and weariness.” –Clarissa Pinkola Estes
Consider the double meaning of the word entrance, signifying an opening as well as a state of awe. What is it about a door opening that so piques our curiosity? Is it the child inside us yearning for novelty and entertainment? Is it equal-parts fear and fascination? It’s almost as though we need to be moved. And in order to move, we must “open the door” into the mysterium tremendum et fascinans (the awe-inspiring, mesmerizing mystery). With closed doors there is no view, there’s no movement, but for the same old static motions of old. With an entrance, however, there is a chance for reanimation. There is a new “way” to go, a new Tao to juggle. There is –hallelujah– something altogether new to be enchanted by.
Solitude as meditation is the preeminent psychological entrance, the perennial crossroads, the existential gap. It can be an exponentially progressive spiral –a place where all roads begin and all roads end, where all doors open and all doors close. In order to arrive there, all one needs is to be awake and alone enough to take in one’s surroundings. Being alone in nature is important. Nature deprivation is overly rampant in the everyday click and hum of modern-day life. Solitude allows us to reconnect with the sacred. We are free to leave behind the hare-brained ferocity of civilization with the tortoise-mind serenity of nature.
Just as we take the world into our bodies, in the form of food, should we not dive deep into the world and let it swallow us, in the form of solitude? In this way, through the two-way mirror of consumption, we become one with the world. We eat the world for sustenance and then we balance the cycle by allowing the world to “eat” us in recompense. This is the epitome of expiation; the pinnacle of cosmic respect.
“One of the least discussed issues of individuation is that as one shines light into the dark of the psyche as strongly as one can, the shadows, where the light is not, grow even darker.” –Clarissa Pinkola Estes
It is during meditation and solitude where we are free to face our shadow, our bête noire: “black beast.” It is here where we are allowed to wrestle with our doubt, with the arbitrariness of self. The black beast is the hungry ghost inside us all. But it is a ghost that must be fed, an unconscious beast that just needs to be thrown a bone. And it is up to us, and only us, to feed it. In the process of “feeding” it, we discover that our fear dissipates. The ghost becomes Casper-like, friendly, and championing us in our cause. It becomes puppy-like and grows up to be our best friend, standing by our side until the end.
However, feeding the beast is no easy task. For is it not when we are alone, away from the billion blinking machines and distanced from the billion hollering mouths of men, that we feel the awesome weight of time upon our shoulders and the mercurial ache of loneliness in our heart?
Indeed, but this is no time for self-pity. This is a time to fill in the blind spot. This is a time to embrace despair, rather than dally with minimalizing it and pigeonholing it into a subordinate emotion. Our despair is paramount and must be allowed its space, lest we fool ourselves into believing in false hope. Ironically, it is in the act of embracing despair that we discover true hope. Not a childish hope or an immature gamble, but rather a rediscovery of innocence in the face of death. It is a mature gambol, allowing for the cosmos to be as it is: impermanent and thereby meaningful and beautiful.
“Man,” said Blaise Pascal, “is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges as the infinity in which he is engulfed.” But when we embrace our own despair, through solitude and meditation, our third eye opens. From this new coign of vantage, we are able to see the nothingness for what it is, just as we are able to feel the infinity in which we are engulfed. We realize that, out there in the “great loneliness,” though we are just a mere grain of sand in an endless desert, we give that desert meaning simply by perceiving it. And suddenly we are not so small.
We are each of us a microcosm within a macrocosm. This is the great lesson of loneliness. We can no more separate the micro from the macro than we can the human from the natural. Both are needed to put the whole holistic. If we live too long without giving recognition to our despair, to our eternal suffering, we risk turning our lives and our reality into a bureaucracy. It is only in suffering our smallness that we can actualize our greatness and finally accept that our mere presence, albeit minuscule and a mere flash in the pan compared to the greater infinity, is a mighty catalyst for the evolution of the cosmos. Solitude and meditation, especially upon suffering and despair, turns the tables on the universe; where instead of trying to possess our life, we are possessed by it. Like Kierkegaard said, “The pupil of possibility receives infinity.”
“You exist, but do you live?” –graffito
In our inert world, where spiritual disorientation and groundlessness prevail, we are crippled by the great crisis of modernity: disenchantment. We try in vain to force-feed enchantment to each other, through television, sports, and movies. Our disenchantment, however, is not regarding a lack of entertainment, but rather a lack of self-permeability, a lack of connection with the cosmos. We are so ecologically impoverished that we experience a deep sense of alienation; not only within society but within our own skin. Meditating on “the great loneliness,” is an escape from this disenchantment. It is a kind of reprieve from the spiritually estranged clockwork of society, a place where we can lose ourselves so as to be reoriented and grounded with the cosmos.
In a sense, those who cannot really feel themselves lost can never truly be found. Losing oneself in solitude is a means to the end of finding oneself in meditation. Fools do not strive for self-discovery because they are too self-centered and believe that they have all the answers. The wise do not strive for self-discovery because they already have it. It’s only the people in between –the majority– that are vulnerable and lost, drowning in the daunting eternity of it all. Meditating in solitude brings forth the gift of feeling lost. It is a gift because only with it can we ascend to a state of being “found,” to becoming, once again, enchanted.
Enchantment develops when we are, all-at-once, trumped by, and triumphant over, the greater cosmos. And then lost and re-found and lost again in the continuing cycle of the human leitmotif. It is exactly this sense of inner-lost-and-found –this balance of self-exploration and self-negation– that keeps us adventurous, curious, and open to the many vicissitudes of life. Indeed, it is this that transforms us into autodidacts armed with open-mindedness, spiritual plasticity, and a hunger for the unknown.
Meditation and solitude are “entrances” into this hunger for the unknown. If allowed infinite transgression hunger for the unknown eventually actualizes itself in the concept of fallibilism, where essentially there are no answers because even if there were they could always be questioned, ad infinitum. Ascending to a state of being found in the realization that all things are infinitely unfounded, and all the more joyous and enchanting because of that fact.
About the Author
Gary ‘Z’ McGee, a former Navy Intelligence Specialist turned philosopher, is the author of Birthday Suit of God and The Looking Glass Man. His works are inspired by the great philosophers of the ages and his wide awake view of the modern world.