consciouslifenews--2020-07-24--3 Myths About Astrology You Should Stop Believing

Astrology has had a recent upsurge in popularity , and more people have some information about it then ever before .
While this is a positive development , there is a downside .
The downside is that there is also a lot of misinformation as well .
In this article , we will address 3 common myths about astrology that you should stop believing .
1 ) Astrologers are using the wrong zodiac For most of human history , astrology and astronomy were combined .
When Ancient people studied and measured the orbits of the planets and the stars , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meaning .
To them , the movements of the planets and the stars represented spiritual forces and gave signals and signs concerning the will of gods and goddesses .
Ancient astronomers/astrologers tracked the sky with great precision and detail , and many of the foundations of modern astronomy are based on the work of the Ancients , particularly the Ancient Greeks .
Sadly , in the Enlightenment , the disciplines of astrology and astronomy split , and astronomers began to have contempt and animosity towards astrologers .
In attempting to dispute astrology , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ astrologers are using the wrong zodiac .
The basis for this myth is as follows .
The constellations of the zodiac are made up of what are known as “ fixed stars.
” Despite the name , fixed stars are not completely fixed .
There is a phenomenon known as “ precession of the equinoxes , ” which is caused by a slight wobble in the Earth ’ s rotation that makes the fixed stars move ever so slowly .
This means that the constellations along the ecliptic , known as the zodiac @ @ @ @ @ @ @ known since at least the 2nd Century B.C.E .
In the Hellenistic Era , the constellation Aries was rising in the sky at dawn on the Spring Equinox .
Currently , according to most astrologers and astronomers , the constellation Pisces is rising at the Spring Equinox .
Sometime in the future , it will be the sign Aquarius .
This is the astrological meaning of the Age of Aquarius .
This leaves astrologers with a dilemma .
Should the sky be divided by the actual constellations , which drift from alignment with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fixed division that stays consistent with the seasons ?
Western Astrology made the decision to use a fixed division of the sky that stays aligned with the seasons .
This is known as the Tropical Zodiac .
In this zodiac , 0° Aries is the place of the Sun at the Spring Equinox , and the sky is divided into twelve equal parts which are named for the rest of the signs of the zodiac .
Vedic Astrology made the opposite decision and kept its zodiac consistent with the constellations , without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This zodiac is known as the Sidereal Zodiac .
While there are debates among astrologers as to which zodiac to use , the Tropical and Sidereal Zodiacs both have long pedigrees and give accurate results within their respective systems .
2 ) There is a newly discovered 13th Sign of the Zodiac On a similar note , from time to time , another myth spreads through the news .
This myth is that scientists have discovered a 13th sign in the zodiac and that we all must change the sign we think we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ named Ophiuchus , and it is not a new discovery at all .
It partially intersects the ecliptic between the constellations Scorpio and Sagittarius .
Ophiuchus has been known since at least the time of the Ancient Babylonians , and probably before .
Ancient astronomers/astrologers purposely did not include it in their system .
As discussed above , most Western astrologers use the Tropical Zodiac based on the seasons rather than the actual constellations , and so a “ new ” constellation is irrelevant to the system in any case .
Even if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the actual constellations , there is no need to include Ophiuchus .
While the stars are universal , the constellations are not .
Constellations are groupings of stars and are determined by the priests , astrologers , and astronomers of each culture .
For example , Ancient Chinese astrology divided the ecliptic into what are known as Lunar Mansions , and some forms of astrology , including Vedic Astrology , continue to use various forms of Lunar Mansions to this day .
Therefore , it is a choice of astrologers as to how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mainstream astrologers choose to trust one of the divisions made by the Ancients .
There may be some astrologers who do choose to incorporate Ophiuchus , but these astrologers are in the vast minority in the field .
Most people first learn about astrology through their Sun Signs .
Your Sun Sign is the sign , or division of the sky , that the Sun was in when you were born .
Many places such as Numerology Sign give information on astrology based on your Sun Sign .
One reason for this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Sun Sign .
All you need to know is your birthday .
Another reason is that the Sun represents who we are on a very deep level , so almost everyone will have some traits of their Sun Sign .
On the other hand , people are much more complicated than that , and few people resonate with their Sun Sign perfectly .
To get a complete picture of a person , astrologers will cast what is known as a Natal Chart , which is a map of the entire sky @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s first breath .
This chart is complicated , and it contains varied and sometimes contradictory information .
Professional astrologers spend years and even decades learning to weigh and interpret the information in a Natal Chart in a meaningful way .
If you do not want to see a professional astrologer , and if you do not want to spend decades learning the craft , there is a quick and easy way to get a more detailed picture of your personality than your Sun Sign alone can provide .
This may be especially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has you baffled .
The first thing you need to do is to find your time and place of birth .
Usually , this will be listed on your birth certificate , but if it is not , you may have to ask someone who would know , like your mother .
Using this information , you can find websites such as Terry Nazon , which will cast your Natal Chart for free .
For this purpose , determine the signs of Sun , Moon , and Ascendant .
When you are reading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all three of these .
The order you should read them depends on whether you were born during the day or at night .
If you were born during the day , read the descriptions in the following order : 1 ) Sun Sign , 2 ) Ascendant , and 3 ) Moon Sign .
If you were born at night , read in this order : 1 ) Moon Sign , 2 ) Ascendant , and 3 ) Sun Sign .
This will give you a fuller sense of your personality and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In this article , we have looked at 3 common myths of astrology .
These myths are that astrologers are using the wrong zodiac , that there is a newly discovered 13th sign , and that Sun Sign descriptions will perfectly match your personality .
These myths are not true , and we have given you better and more accurate information to rely upon instead .

Astrology has had a recent upsurge in popularity, and more people have some information about it then ever before. While this is a positive development, there is a downside. The downside is that there is also a lot of misinformation as well. In this article, we will address 3 common myths about astrology that you should stop believing.
1) Astrologers are using the wrong zodiac
For most of human history, astrology and astronomy were combined. When Ancient people studied and measured the orbits of the planets and the stars, they were doing so to look for meaning. To them, the movements of the planets and the stars represented spiritual forces and gave signals and signs concerning the will of gods and goddesses. Ancient astronomers/astrologers tracked the sky with great precision and detail, and many of the foundations of modern astronomy are based on the work of the Ancients, particularly the Ancient Greeks.
Sadly, in the Enlightenment, the disciplines of astrology and astronomy split, and astronomers began to have contempt and animosity towards astrologers. In attempting to dispute astrology, some astronomers have spread a myth that astrologers are using the wrong zodiac. The basis for this myth is as follows.
The constellations of the zodiac are made up of what are known as “fixed stars.” Despite the name, fixed stars are not completely fixed. There is a phenomenon known as “precession of the equinoxes,” which is caused by a slight wobble in the Earth’s rotation that makes the fixed stars move ever so slowly. This means that the constellations along the ecliptic, known as the zodiac, also move. This has been known since at least the 2nd Century B.C.E.
In the Hellenistic Era, the constellation Aries was rising in the sky at dawn on the Spring Equinox. Currently, according to most astrologers and astronomers, the constellation Pisces is rising at the Spring Equinox. Sometime in the future, it will be the sign Aquarius. This is the astrological meaning of the Age of Aquarius. This leaves astrologers with a dilemma. Should the sky be divided by the actual constellations, which drift from alignment with the seasons, or should there be a fixed division that stays consistent with the seasons?
Western Astrology made the decision to use a fixed division of the sky that stays aligned with the seasons. This is known as the Tropical Zodiac. In this zodiac, 0° Aries is the place of the Sun at the Spring Equinox, and the sky is divided into twelve equal parts which are named for the rest of the signs of the zodiac. Vedic Astrology made the opposite decision and kept its zodiac consistent with the constellations, without worrying about alignment with the seasons. This zodiac is known as the Sidereal Zodiac.
While there are debates among astrologers as to which zodiac to use, the Tropical and Sidereal Zodiacs both have long pedigrees and give accurate results within their respective systems.
2) There is a newly discovered 13th Sign of the Zodiac
On a similar note, from time to time, another myth spreads through the news. This myth is that scientists have discovered a 13th sign in the zodiac and that we all must change the sign we think we are.
The constellation in question is named Ophiuchus, and it is not a new discovery at all. It partially intersects the ecliptic between the constellations Scorpio and Sagittarius. Ophiuchus has been known since at least the time of the Ancient Babylonians, and probably before. Ancient astronomers/astrologers purposely did not include it in their system. As discussed above, most Western astrologers use the Tropical Zodiac based on the seasons rather than the actual constellations, and so a “new” constellation is irrelevant to the system in any case.
Even if one using the Sidereal Zodiac based on the actual constellations, there is no need to include Ophiuchus. While the stars are universal, the constellations are not. Constellations are groupings of stars and are determined by the priests, astrologers, and astronomers of each culture. For example, Ancient Chinese astrology divided the ecliptic into what are known as Lunar Mansions, and some forms of astrology, including Vedic Astrology, continue to use various forms of Lunar Mansions to this day. Therefore, it is a choice of astrologers as to how to divide the sky, and most mainstream astrologers choose to trust one of the divisions made by the Ancients.
There may be some astrologers who do choose to incorporate Ophiuchus, but these astrologers are in the vast minority in the field.
3) A Sun Sign description should match your personality perfectly
Most people first learn about astrology through their Sun Signs. Your Sun Sign is the sign, or division of the sky, that the Sun was in when you were born. Many places such as Numerology Sign give information on astrology based on your Sun Sign. One reason for this is that it is easy to determine one’s Sun Sign. All you need to know is your birthday. Another reason is that the Sun represents who we are on a very deep level, so almost everyone will have some traits of their Sun Sign.
On the other hand, people are much more complicated than that, and few people resonate with their Sun Sign perfectly. To get a complete picture of a person, astrologers will cast what is known as a Natal Chart, which is a map of the entire sky at the time of that person’s first breath. This chart is complicated, and it contains varied and sometimes contradictory information. Professional astrologers spend years and even decades learning to weigh and interpret the information in a Natal Chart in a meaningful way.
If you do not want to see a professional astrologer, and if you do not want to spend decades learning the craft, there is a quick and easy way to get a more detailed picture of your personality than your Sun Sign alone can provide. This may be especially helpful to you if your Sun Sign has you baffled. The first thing you need to do is to find your time and place of birth. Usually, this will be listed on your birth certificate, but if it is not, you may have to ask someone who would know, like your mother. Using this information, you can find websites such as Terry Nazon, which will cast your Natal Chart for free.
For this purpose, determine the signs of Sun, Moon, and Ascendant. When you are reading Sun Sign descriptions, you should read all three of these. The order you should read them depends on whether you were born during the day or at night. If you were born during the day, read the descriptions in the following order: 1) Sun Sign, 2) Ascendant, and 3) Moon Sign. If you were born at night, read in this order: 1) Moon Sign, 2) Ascendant, and 3) Sun Sign. This will give you a fuller sense of your personality and character than your Sun Sign alone.
In this article, we have looked at 3 common myths of astrology. These myths are that astrologers are using the wrong zodiac, that there is a newly discovered 13th sign, and that Sun Sign descriptions will perfectly match your personality. These myths are not true, and we have given you better and more accurate information to rely upon instead.


consciouslifenews--2020-07-24--New Technique to Capture Carbon Dioxide Could Greatly Reduce Power Plant Greenhouse Gases

A big advance in carbon capture technology could provide an efficient and inexpensive way for natural gas power plants to remove carbon dioxide from their flue emissions , a necessary step in reducing greenhouse gas emissions to slow global warming and climate change .
Developed by researchers at the University of California , Berkeley , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and ExxonMobil , the new technique uses a highly porous material called a metal-organic framework , or MOF , modified with nitrogen-containing amine molecules to capture the CO and low-temperature steam to flush out the CO for other uses or to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the technique showed six times the greater capacity for removing CO from flue gas than current amine-based technology , and it was highly selective , capturing more than 90 % of the CO emitted .
The process uses low-temperature steam to regenerate the MOF for repeated use , meaning less energy is required for carbon capture .
“ For CO capture , steam stripping—where you use direct contact with steam to take off the CO —has been a sort of holy grail for the field .
It is rightly seen as the cheapest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ senior researcher Jeffrey Long , UC Berkeley professor of chemistry and of chemical and biomolecular engineering and senior faculty scientist at Berkeley Lab .
“ These materials , at least from the experiments we have done so far , look very promising.
” Because there 's little market for most captured CO , power plants would likely pump most of it back into the ground , or sequester it , where it would ideally turn into rock .
The cost of scrubbing the emissions would have to be facilitated by government policies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tax , to incentivize CO capture and sequestration , something many countries have already implemented .
The work was funded by ExxonMobil , which is working with both the Berkeley group and Long 's start-up , Mosaic Materials Inc. , to develop , scale-up , and test processes for stripping CO from emissions .
Long is the senior author of a paper describing the new technique that will appear in the July 24 issue of the journal Science .
“ We were able to take the initial discovery and , through research and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lab experiments has shown the potential to not only capture CO under the extreme conditions present in flue gas emissions from natural gas power plants but to do so with no loss in selectivity , ” said co-author Simon Weston , senior research associate and the project lead at ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co. “ We have shown that these new materials can then be regenerated with low-grade steam for repeated use , providing a pathway for a viable solution for carbon capture at scale.
” Carbon dioxide emissions by fossil fuel-burning vehicles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ account for an estimated 65 % of the greenhouse gases driving climate change , which has already increased Earth 's average temperature by 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit ( 1 degree Celsius ) since the 19th century .
Without a decrease in these emissions , climate scientists predict ever hotter temperatures , more erratic and violent storms , several feet of sea-level rise and resulting droughts , floods , fires , famine , and conflict .
“ In reality , of the kinds of things that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says we need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CO capture is a huge part , ” Long said .
“ We do n't have a use for most of the CO that we need to stop emitting , but we have to do it.
” Power plants strip CO from flue emissions today by bubbling flue gases through organic amines in water , which bind and extract the carbon dioxide .
The liquid is then heated to 120-150 C ( 250-300 F ) to release the CO gas , after which the liquids are reused .
The entire process consumes about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sequestering the captured CO underground costs an additional , though small , a fraction of that .
Six years ago , Long and his group in UC Berkeley 's Center for Gas Separations , which is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy , discovered a chemically modified MOF that readily captures CO from concentrated power plant flue emissions , potentially reducing the capture cost by half .
They added diamine molecules to a magnesium-based MOF to catalyze the formation of polymer chains of CO that could then be purged by flushing with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Because MOFs are very porous , in this case like a honeycomb , an amount the weight of a paper clip has an internal surface area equal to that of a football field , all available for adsorbing gases .
A major advantage of the amine-appended MOFs is that the amines can be tweaked to capture CO at different concentrations , ranging from 12 % to 15 % typical of coal plant emissions to the 4 % typical of natural gas plants , or even the much lower concentrations in ambient air .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ directs , was created to make this technique available widely to power and industrial plants .
But the 180 C stream of water and CO needed to flush the captured CO eventually drives off the diamine molecules , shortening the life of the material .
The new version uses four amine molecules—a tetraamine—that is much more stable at high temperatures and in the presence of steam .
“ The tetraamines are so strongly bound within the MOF that we can use a very concentrated stream of water vapor with zero CO , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adsorbents , the steam would start destroying the material , ” Long said .
They showed that direct contact with steam at 110-120 C—a bit above the boiling point of water—works well to flush out the CO .
Steam at that temperature is readily available in natural gas power plants , whereas the 180 C CO -water mix required to regenerate the earlier modified MOF necessitated heating , which wastes energy .
When Long , Weston and their colleagues first thought about replacing diamines with tougher tetraamines , it seemed like a long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diamine-containing MOFs suggested that there could be ways of connecting two diamines to form a tetraamine while preserving the ability of the material to polymerize CO .
When UC Berkeley graduate student Eugene Kim , the paper 's first author , chemically created the tetraamine-appended MOF , it outperformed the diamine-appended MOF on the first try .
The researchers subsequently studied the structure of the modified MOF using Berkeley Lab 's Advanced Light Source , revealing that the CO polymers that line the pores of the MOF are actually linked by the tetraamines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the rungs .
First-principles density functional theory calculations using the Cori supercomputer in Berkeley Lab 's National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center ( NERSC ) , computing resources at the Molecular Foundry and resources provided by the campus 's Berkeley Research Computing program confirmed this remarkable structure that Long 's team had initially envisioned .
“ I have been doing research at Cal for 23 years now , and this is one of those times where you have what seemed like a crazy idea , and it just worked right away , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kim , and Weston are Joseph Falkowski from ExxonMobil ; Rebecca Siegelman , Henry Jiang , Alexander Forse , Jeffrey Martell , Phillip Milner , Jeffrey Reimer and Jeffrey Neaton from UC Berkeley ; and Jung-Hoon Lee from Berkeley Lab .
Neaton and Reimer also are faculty senior scientists at Berkeley Lab .

By | Phys.org
A big advance in carbon capture technology could provide an efficient and inexpensive way for natural gas power plants to remove carbon dioxide from their flue emissions, a necessary step in reducing greenhouse gas emissions to slow global warming and climate change.
Developed by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and ExxonMobil, the new technique uses a highly porous material called a metal-organic framework, or MOF, modified with nitrogen-containing amine molecules to capture the CO 2 and low-temperature steam to flush out the CO 2 for other uses or to sequester it underground.
In experiments, the technique showed six times the greater capacity for removing CO 2 from flue gas than current amine-based technology, and it was highly selective, capturing more than 90% of the CO 2 emitted. The process uses low-temperature steam to regenerate the MOF for repeated use, meaning less energy is required for carbon capture.
“For CO 2 capture, steam stripping—where you use direct contact with steam to take off the CO 2 —has been a sort of holy grail for the field. It is rightly seen as the cheapest way to do it,” said senior researcher Jeffrey Long, UC Berkeley professor of chemistry and of chemical and biomolecular engineering and senior faculty scientist at Berkeley Lab. “These materials, at least from the experiments we have done so far, look very promising.”
Because there's little market for most captured CO 2 , power plants would likely pump most of it back into the ground, or sequester it, where it would ideally turn into rock. The cost of scrubbing the emissions would have to be facilitated by government policies, such as carbon trading or a carbon tax, to incentivize CO 2 capture and sequestration, something many countries have already implemented.
The work was funded by ExxonMobil, which is working with both the Berkeley group and Long's start-up, Mosaic Materials Inc., to develop, scale-up, and test processes for stripping CO 2 from emissions.
Long is the senior author of a paper describing the new technique that will appear in the July 24 issue of the journal Science.
“We were able to take the initial discovery and, through research and testing, derive a material that in lab experiments has shown the potential to not only capture CO 2 under the extreme conditions present in flue gas emissions from natural gas power plants but to do so with no loss in selectivity,” said co-author Simon Weston, senior research associate and the project lead at ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co. “We have shown that these new materials can then be regenerated with low-grade steam for repeated use, providing a pathway for a viable solution for carbon capture at scale.”
Carbon dioxide emissions by fossil fuel-burning vehicles, electricity generating plants, and industry account for an estimated 65% of the greenhouse gases driving climate change, which has already increased Earth's average temperature by 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) since the 19th century. Without a decrease in these emissions, climate scientists predict ever hotter temperatures, more erratic and violent storms, several feet of sea-level rise and resulting droughts, floods, fires, famine, and conflict.
“In reality, of the kinds of things that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says we need to do to control global warming, CO 2 capture is a huge part,” Long said. “We don't have a use for most of the CO 2 that we need to stop emitting, but we have to do it.”
Stripping
Power plants strip CO 2 from flue emissions today by bubbling flue gases through organic amines in water, which bind and extract the carbon dioxide. The liquid is then heated to 120-150 C (250-300 F) to release the CO 2 gas, after which the liquids are reused. The entire process consumes about 30% of the power generated. Sequestering the captured CO 2 underground costs an additional, though small, a fraction of that.
Six years ago, Long and his group in UC Berkeley's Center for Gas Separations, which is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, discovered a chemically modified MOF that readily captures CO 2 from concentrated power plant flue emissions, potentially reducing the capture cost by half. They added diamine molecules to a magnesium-based MOF to catalyze the formation of polymer chains of CO 2 that could then be purged by flushing with a humid stream of carbon dioxide.
Because MOFs are very porous, in this case like a honeycomb, an amount the weight of a paper clip has an internal surface area equal to that of a football field, all available for adsorbing gases.
A major advantage of the amine-appended MOFs is that the amines can be tweaked to capture CO 2 at different concentrations, ranging from 12% to 15% typical of coal plant emissions to the 4% typical of natural gas plants, or even the much lower concentrations in ambient air. Mosaic Materials, which Long co-founded and directs, was created to make this technique available widely to power and industrial plants.
But the 180 C stream of water and CO 2 needed to flush the captured CO 2 eventually drives off the diamine molecules, shortening the life of the material. The new version uses four amine molecules—a tetraamine—that is much more stable at high temperatures and in the presence of steam.
“The tetraamines are so strongly bound within the MOF that we can use a very concentrated stream of water vapor with zero CO 2 , and if you tried that with the previous adsorbents, the steam would start destroying the material,” Long said.
They showed that direct contact with steam at 110-120 C—a bit above the boiling point of water—works well to flush out the CO 2 . Steam at that temperature is readily available in natural gas power plants, whereas the 180 C CO 2 -water mix required to regenerate the earlier modified MOF necessitated heating, which wastes energy.
When Long, Weston and their colleagues first thought about replacing diamines with tougher tetraamines, it seemed like a long shot. But crystal structures of the diamine-containing MOFs suggested that there could be ways of connecting two diamines to form a tetraamine while preserving the ability of the material to polymerize CO 2 . When UC Berkeley graduate student Eugene Kim, the paper's first author, chemically created the tetraamine-appended MOF, it outperformed the diamine-appended MOF on the first try.
The researchers subsequently studied the structure of the modified MOF using Berkeley Lab's Advanced Light Source, revealing that the CO 2 polymers that line the pores of the MOF are actually linked by the tetraamines, like a ladder with tetraamines as the rungs. First-principles density functional theory calculations using the Cori supercomputer in Berkeley Lab's National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), computing resources at the Molecular Foundry and resources provided by the campus's Berkeley Research Computing program confirmed this remarkable structure that Long's team had initially envisioned.
“I have been doing research at Cal for 23 years now, and this is one of those times where you have what seemed like a crazy idea, and it just worked right away,” Long said.
Co-authors with Long, Kim, and Weston are Joseph Falkowski from ExxonMobil; Rebecca Siegelman, Henry Jiang, Alexander Forse, Jeffrey Martell, Phillip Milner, Jeffrey Reimer and Jeffrey Neaton from UC Berkeley; and Jung-Hoon Lee from Berkeley Lab. Neaton and Reimer also are faculty senior scientists at Berkeley Lab.


consciouslifenews--2020-07-24--Eight Keys to Bridging Our Differences

Eight Keys to Bridging Our Differences

The two of us would like to think we are .
After all , over the past two years , we ’ ve helped to lead the Greater Good Science Center ’ s Bridging Differences initiative , which has been exploring the keys to positive dialogue and understanding across lines of race , religion , political ideology , and more .
Yet this work has raised some challenging questions for us .
Does “ bridging differences ” mean that we paper over social injustice in pursuit of social harmony ?
Does it require us to sacrifice our ideals in order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Or to accommodate views or behavior that we find abhorrent ?
These questions have taken on even greater urgency over the past several months , as the COVID-19 pandemic has forced a reckoning with systemic racism in this country and all of the inequities that follow from it .
Calls to “ bridge differences ” at this moment can seem to gloss over centuries of discrimination and oppression , pushing for reconciliation before fully acknowledging and addressing the experiences of African Americans .
That ’ s one big reason—among many—why we think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bridging differences actually entails .
In reviewing years of research on the topic , and through conversations with some of the leading voices in the field , we have surfaced eight key principles to help explain what we think bridging differences is—and is not—all about .
First off , it ’ s important to stress that bridge-building does not mean that you always agree with another person or even find common ground with them .
In fact , you might disagree with them vehemently .
But the key is that you don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reduce them to a caricature or see them as somehow less worthy of health and happiness than you are .
Indeed , bridging starts from recognizing that another person or group has their own human needs , tastes , values , goals , and worldview , just as you do .
Without that basic recognition of your shared humanity , constructive dialogue—to say nothing of problem-solving—is unlikely to happen .
“ A lot of bridging happens because someone feels like they ’ ve been heard , ” says John a. Powell , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UC Berkeley ’ s Othering and Belonging Institute .
“ It means a lot to be seen , heard , and understood .
.
.
it ’ s very close to being loved.
” By contrast , research by Emile Bruneau and Nour Kteily suggests that dehumanizing a member of another group is strongly associated with feelings of hostility and aggression toward that group—these are the types of feelings that “ feed cycles of intergroup violence , ” write Bruneau and Kteily .
Another study found that people who dehumanize their political opponents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and even prefer greater social distance from them—in effect , the opposite of bridging .
2 .
Bridging is not about persuasion ; it ’ s about understanding The true goal of bridging differences is not to convince the other person of your viewpoint—or even necessarily to build consensus .
“ Bridging work is not a sneaky way to convert people to your ideological position , ” says Reverend Jennifer Bailey , founder of the Faith Matters Network and co-founder of The People ’ s Supper , which brings people together over dinner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the heart of bridging work lies in trying to understand someone else ’ s perspective .
While you might not share their views , you don ’ t dismiss them ; you dig deeper to try to appreciate where those views came from .
This often requires asking questions and being willing to suspend judgment .
The benefits of this type of perspective-taking are profound : One study , led by UCLA researcher Margaret Shih , suggests that when a member of one ethnic group tries to see the world through the eyes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report liking members of that group more and are more likely to help them out .
Other research suggests that perspective-taking reduces knee-jerk racial biases .
It ’ s worth noting , though , that research by Bruneau has found that when there are power imbalances between two groups , it ’ s more valuable for someone from the lower-power group to their perspective rather than to try to take the other person ’ s .
The term “ bridging ” can often seem synonymous with compromise .
To bridge your differences with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you need to give up your own closely held beliefs .
“ Today in the national media , the notion of structural , systemic change is offered up in contrast to being ‘ bipartisan , ’ ” said Steven Olikara , the founder and president of the Millennial Action Project ( MAP ) , at a recent GGSC event on Bridging Differences .
In other words , if you want to build political bridges , you can ’ t expect to stray too far from the status quo .
But instead , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politicians from the political left and right , Olikara has found that the bridgers are the ones who get stuff done—even effecting changes that some people thought were too ambitious , such as ending partisan gerrymandering in Ohio .
“ So that ’ s an example where we had a radical idea about structural , systemic change , ” says Olikara , “ but we used [ Rev .
Dr. Martin Luther ] King ’ s methodology of building bridges with not just people in the moderate center but from across the political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we had enough support for it to ultimately pass.
” 4 .
Bridging involves inner work , not just action When we think about bridging differences , we usually think about grand gestures or breakthrough conversations .
But the truth is that much of the work happens before those events ever take place .
To make them possible , we often need to cultivate the right mindsets and psychological approach—and that ’ s something we can ( or must ) do outside of our interactions with other people .
That ’ s why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Bridging Differences Playbook is devoted to skills—skills you can practice on your own , to build your capacity for more positive interactions with other people and across groups .
For instance , research has indicated that practicing mindfulness can actually reduce biased attitudes and behavior against members of a different group .
To bridge differences , you usually need to accept that you don ’ t have all the answers or own a monopoly on the truth—an outlook that researchers refer to as “ intellectual humility.
” This is especially important because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different cultures or communities .
You probably won ’ t get very far in your bridge-building efforts if you presume that your own tradition or story is definitely the right one .
This is true whether you ’ re talking about major historical events or your own family ’ s history : You need to recognize that your narrative isn ’ t the only one that matters .
In fact , research has found that when people with strong religious beliefs were confronted by doctrines from another religion , those who were lower @ @ @ @ @ @ @ favor of their own religious beliefs , and more vehemently against the other religion ’ s beliefs , than did people higher in intellectual humility .
The more humble folks showed greater openness to other people ’ s views and experiences .
6 .
Bridging is sometimes about small shifts over time While bridging differences might involve trying to overcome a history of conflicts—interpersonal or political—or forging an alliance between once-opposing groups to work toward a common goal , it sometimes centers on more modest shifts .
That can mean just setting an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the line .
“ Bridging is sometimes just putting a flag in your land that says , ‘ I ’ m working on it , ’ ” says Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton , a professor of psychology at UC Berkeley and a faculty advisor to the Greater Good Science Center .
“ Sometimes that ’ s the job of the person who bridges , to make small incremental changes.
” In that vein , Powell talks about “ short ” and “ long ” bridges ; the psychological and emotional distance someone needs to travel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ With a short bridge , for instance , two people might both believe in climate change but have different approaches on how to address it .
Then there are cases where the distance between two people might feel greater and more challenging to overcome .
One person might be a climate change activist while the other might deny climate change altogether .
Traversing these longer bridges requires an investment of more time and trust .
There ’ s more at stake , too .
While crossing a long bridge is an ambitious and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ underestimate the significance , and even the challenges , of crossing some smaller bridges , as well .
Indeed , crossing those short bridges can be good practice for ultimately crossing the longer ones .
7 .
Bridging is not without risk Bridging often involves taking risks and exposing vulnerability .
You may risk having your overtures rejected , and you may often need to express feelings of hurt , anger , or disappointment .
“ The first person takes the greatest risk , but once that happens , others are likely to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Perhaps most of all , when you truly try to hear someone else ’ s views , you risk being changed or influenced by what you hear .
“ That willingness to be transformed is also a necessary part to do authentic bridging work , ” says Bailey .
“ I don ’ t think you can walk away from a bridging scenario , particularly when you ’ re bridging differences , and remain exactly the same.
” 8 .
Not everyone should bridge Partly because of those risks , it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or should be a Bridge Builder , or feel compelled to build bridges in every situation .
The work of bridging should not be done by demand .
It ’ s ethically dubious—and , research suggests , often counterproductive—to ask people to bridge differences when they ’ re being discriminated against or otherwise denied social power .
Before they ’ re ready to bridge , some must heal from personal trauma .
And it can be psychologically harmful , not to mention physically dangerous , to try to forge a connection with someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or threatens you with violence .
As we ’ ve suggested above , bridge building shouldn ’ t be used as a tool of persuasion or coercion , especially not to consolidate power in order to attack or oppress others .
It ’ s about expanding one ’ s sense of commonality with others , not about constricting them to adopt your worldview .
There ’ s one final point we should stress about bridge-building : As well-intentioned as we may be , trying to bridge differences often won ’ t lead to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least not at first .
It is a deeply human process , and we ’ ll often make mistakes along the way .
It ’ s critical to remember to be compassionate toward ourselves and others when we encounter setbacks .
“ You don ’ t have to resolve every conflict , ” Mendoza-Denton says .
“ And you don ’ t have to have every answer.
” Tags : `` featured , bridging differences , bridging our differences , featured , keys to bridging our differences

By Scott Shigeoka, Jason Marsh | Greater Good Magazine
Are you a Bridger?
The two of us would like to think we are. After all, over the past two years, we’ve helped to lead the Greater Good Science Center’s Bridging Differences initiative, which has been exploring the keys to positive dialogue and understanding across lines of race, religion, political ideology, and more.
Yet this work has raised some challenging questions for us. Does “bridging differences” mean that we paper over social injustice in pursuit of social harmony? Does it require us to sacrifice our ideals in order to always find common ground with others? Or to accommodate views or behavior that we find abhorrent?
These questions have taken on even greater urgency over the past several months, as the COVID-19 pandemic has forced a reckoning with systemic racism in this country and all of the inequities that follow from it. Calls to “bridge differences” at this moment can seem to gloss over centuries of discrimination and oppression, pushing for reconciliation before fully acknowledging and addressing the experiences of African Americans.
That’s one big reason—among many—why we think it’s important to clarify what bridging differences actually entails. In reviewing years of research on the topic, and through conversations with some of the leading voices in the field, we have surfaced eight key principles to help explain what we think bridging differences is—and is not—all about.
1. Bridging starts with a recognition of common humanity
First off, it’s important to stress that bridge-building does not mean that you always agree with another person or even find common ground with them. In fact, you might disagree with them vehemently. But the key is that you don’t dehumanize them in the process—you never reduce them to a caricature or see them as somehow less worthy of health and happiness than you are.
Indeed, bridging starts from recognizing that another person or group has their own human needs, tastes, values, goals, and worldview, just as you do. Without that basic recognition of your shared humanity, constructive dialogue—to say nothing of problem-solving—is unlikely to happen.
“A lot of bridging happens because someone feels like they’ve been heard,” says John a. Powell, a civil rights expert and the director of UC Berkeley’s Othering and Belonging Institute. “It means a lot to be seen, heard, and understood . . . it’s very close to being loved.”
By contrast, research by Emile Bruneau and Nour Kteily suggests that dehumanizing a member of another group is strongly associated with feelings of hostility and aggression toward that group—these are the types of feelings that “feed cycles of intergroup violence,” write Bruneau and Kteily. Another study found that people who dehumanize their political opponents see greater moral differences between their groups and even prefer greater social distance from them—in effect, the opposite of bridging.
2. Bridging is not about persuasion; it’s about understanding
The true goal of bridging differences is not to convince the other person of your viewpoint—or even necessarily to build consensus.
“Bridging work is not a sneaky way to convert people to your ideological position,” says Reverend Jennifer Bailey, founder of the Faith Matters Network and co-founder of The People’s Supper, which brings people together over dinner to broach challenging topics.
Instead, the heart of bridging work lies in trying to understand someone else’s perspective. While you might not share their views, you don’t dismiss them; you dig deeper to try to appreciate where those views came from. This often requires asking questions and being willing to suspend judgment.
The benefits of this type of perspective-taking are profound: One study, led by UCLA researcher Margaret Shih, suggests that when a member of one ethnic group tries to see the world through the eyes of someone of different ethnicity, they report liking members of that group more and are more likely to help them out. Other research suggests that perspective-taking reduces knee-jerk racial biases.
It’s worth noting, though, that research by Bruneau has found that when there are power imbalances between two groups, it’s more valuable for someone from the lower-power group to give their perspective rather than to try to take the other person’s.
3. Bridging doesn’t require abandoning your beliefs or values
The term “bridging” can often seem synonymous with compromise. To bridge your differences with someone else, the thinking goes, you need to give up your own closely held beliefs.
“Today in the national media, the notion of structural, systemic change is offered up in contrast to being ‘bipartisan,’” said Steven Olikara, the founder and president of the Millennial Action Project (MAP), at a recent GGSC event on Bridging Differences. In other words, if you want to build political bridges, you can’t expect to stray too far from the status quo.
But instead, in MAP’s solutions-oriented work with young politicians from the political left and right, Olikara has found that the bridgers are the ones who get stuff done—even effecting changes that some people thought were too ambitious, such as ending partisan gerrymandering in Ohio.
“So that’s an example where we had a radical idea about structural, systemic change,” says Olikara, “but we used [Rev. Dr. Martin Luther] King’s methodology of building bridges with not just people in the moderate center but from across the political spectrum, and that’s how we had enough support for it to ultimately pass.”
4. Bridging involves inner work, not just action
When we think about bridging differences, we usually think about grand gestures or breakthrough conversations. But the truth is that much of the work happens before those events ever take place. To make them possible, we often need to cultivate the right mindsets and psychological approach—and that’s something we can (or must) do outside of our interactions with other people.
That’s why a substantial portion of the GGSC’s Bridging Differences Playbook is devoted to intrapersonal skills—skills you can practice on your own, to build your capacity for more positive interactions with other people and across groups.
For instance, research has indicated that practicing mindfulness can actually reduce biased attitudes and behavior against members of a different group.
5. Bridging requires modesty and humility
To bridge differences, you usually need to accept that you don’t have all the answers or own a monopoly on the truth—an outlook that researchers refer to as “intellectual humility.”
This is especially important because bridging often involves contact between people from different cultures or communities. You probably won’t get very far in your bridge-building efforts if you presume that your own tradition or story is definitely the right one. This is true whether you’re talking about major historical events or your own family’s history: You need to recognize that your narrative isn’t the only one that matters.
In fact, research has found that when people with strong religious beliefs were confronted by doctrines from another religion, those who were lower in intellectual humility argued more vehemently in favor of their own religious beliefs, and more vehemently against the other religion’s beliefs, than did people higher in intellectual humility. The more humble folks showed greater openness to other people’s views and experiences.
6. Bridging is sometimes about small shifts over time
While bridging differences might involve trying to overcome a history of conflicts—interpersonal or political—or forging an alliance between once-opposing groups to work toward a common goal, it sometimes centers on more modest shifts. That can mean just setting an intention or an openness to change down the line.
“Bridging is sometimes just putting a flag in your land that says, ‘I’m working on it,’” says Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton, a professor of psychology at UC Berkeley and a faculty advisor to the Greater Good Science Center. “Sometimes that’s the job of the person who bridges, to make small incremental changes.”
In that vein, Powell talks about “short” and “long” bridges; the psychological and emotional distance someone needs to travel determines the length of the bridge.
With a short bridge, for instance, two people might both believe in climate change but have different approaches on how to address it.
Then there are cases where the distance between two people might feel greater and more challenging to overcome. One person might be a climate change activist while the other might deny climate change altogether. Traversing these longer bridges requires an investment of more time and trust. There’s more at stake, too.
While crossing a long bridge is an ambitious and worthwhile goal, we shouldn’t underestimate the significance, and even the challenges, of crossing some smaller bridges, as well. Indeed, crossing those short bridges can be good practice for ultimately crossing the longer ones.
7. Bridging is not without risk
Bridging often involves taking risks and exposing vulnerability. You may risk having your overtures rejected, and you may often need to express feelings of hurt, anger, or disappointment.
“The first person takes the greatest risk, but once that happens, others are likely to follow suit,” says Powell.
Perhaps most of all, when you truly try to hear someone else’s views, you risk being changed or influenced by what you hear.
“That willingness to be transformed is also a necessary part to do authentic bridging work,” says Bailey. “I don’t think you can walk away from a bridging scenario, particularly when you’re bridging differences, and remain exactly the same.”
8. Not everyone should bridge
Partly because of those risks, it’s important to recognize that not everyone can or should be a Bridge Builder, or feel compelled to build bridges in every situation. The work of bridging should not be done by demand.
It’s ethically dubious—and, research suggests, often counterproductive—to ask people to bridge differences when they’re being discriminated against or otherwise denied social power. Before they’re ready to bridge, some must heal from personal trauma. And it can be psychologically harmful, not to mention physically dangerous, to try to forge a connection with someone who fundamentally denies your right to exist or threatens you with violence.
As we’ve suggested above, bridge building shouldn’t be used as a tool of persuasion or coercion, especially not to consolidate power in order to attack or oppress others. It’s about expanding one’s sense of commonality with others, not about constricting them to adopt your worldview.
There’s one final point we should stress about bridge-building: As well-intentioned as we may be, trying to bridge differences often won’t lead to the outcomes we hope for, at least not at first. It is a deeply human process, and we’ll often make mistakes along the way. It’s critical to remember to be compassionate toward ourselves and others when we encounter setbacks.
“You don’t have to resolve every conflict,” Mendoza-Denton says. “And you don’t have to have every answer.”
About the Authors
Scott Shigeoka Scott Keoni Shigeoka is a storyteller and entrepreneur. He is the Bridging Differences fellow for UC Berkeley’s Greater Good Science Center and led the development of the Bridging Differences Playbook.


consciouslifenews--2020-07-24--CDC Guidelines for Going Back to School in 2020

Children rarely become infected and are far less likely to spread the infection than adults .
Scientific evidence also conclusively proves masks do not prevent infection or spread of viruses Some of the basic recommendations found in the CDC and AAP guidelines include physical distancing on buses and on school grounds , wearing face masks , screening for symptoms , augmented hygiene and disinfection routines , and signage and broadcasts reminding students of disease prevention strategies Many parents wonder whether the guidelines themselves may do far more harm than good in the long term , as they both unnecessarily frighten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AAP and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have issued guidelines for the “ safe reopening ” of schools According to the American Academy of Pediatrics ( AAP ) , the academic , physical and mental benefits of returning children to school for in-person learning outweigh the potential health risks of COVID-19 According to the American Academy of Pediatrics ( AAP ) , the academic , physical , and mental benefits of returning children to school for in-person learning outweigh the potential health risks of COVID-19 .
To that end , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ safe reopening ” of schools .
However , many parents wonder whether the guidelines themselves may do far more harm than good in the long term .
One parent outlines her concerns in the video above .
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has also issued school reopening guidelines1 in anticipation of nationwide reopening .
Unicef2 also supports students ’ re-entry into schools , noting that reopenings should “ be consistent with each country ’ s overall COVID-19 health response to protect students , staff , teachers , and their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s guidance for school re-entry:3,4 AAP points out that , unlike the influenza virus , SARS-CoV-2 does not appear to spread easily among children and teens .
Indeed , studies from the U.S.,5 Israel6 and the Netherlands7 have demonstrated that children are far less likely to become infected than adults , and far less likely than adults to transmit the virus to others .
In one such study,8 children accounted for just 13 % of transmissions within households .
Other found9 children under the age of 4 were 47 % less likely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to adults in the same household .
July 2020 study10 looking at COVID-19 in children and the dynamics of infection within families found only 0.9 % of COVID-19-positive patients were under the age of 16 , and in just 8 % of cases did a child within the household develop symptoms before an adult .
Science Daily11 also cites a number of other studies confirming the theory that children are rare disease vectors when it comes to COVID-19 : Originally , school closings were based on the premise that the virus responsible for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but since it doesn ’ t , returning children to school is unlikely to pose a significant risk to health .
As mentioned , the CDC has also issued guidelines13 for the re-opening of schools .
While the CDC and AAP guidelines are very similar , the AAP ’ s restrictions tend to be a bit more flexible .
For example , while both call for social distancing with 6 feet between each student at all times , the AAP concedes that this may not always be feasible , and if not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ students wear face masks and are asymptomatic .
Still , as noted in the featured video , students are likely to be just as scared as having to follow COVID-19 prevention guidelines as they are staying at home .
While the exact measures vary depending on the age of the students , some of the basic recommendations found in the CDC and AAP guidelines include:14,15,16,17 • Physical distancing — Students must sit apart on the school bus ; desks must be spaced 6 feet apart and face in the same direction ; floor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the teacher ’ s desk and other areas where lines are formed ; plexiglass barriers will be used in workspaces where physical distancing can not be achieved ; congregation in shared spaces , including playgrounds and cafeterias , is to be discouraged for students and teachers alike ; hallways are to be trafficked in one way only to minimize face to face interaction ; students may not share school supplies ; nonessential visitors , including parents , are discouraged from entering the school , and field trips are to be replaced with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Teachers and students are to wear face coverings at all times .
• Symptom screening — Symptom screening such as temperature checks should ideally be made by parents before dropping the child off at the bus stop or at school .
Staff or students with a temperature above 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit will not be permitted in school .
• Disinfection — Hand hygiene , use of disinfectant , and regular cleaning of surfaces must be adhered to .
• Signage and broadcasts — Signs are to be posted in various areas , such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures to minimize the spread of pathogens , and announcements are to be broadcast over loudspeakers and/or video screens informing students of the same .
As noted in the featured video , these guidelines amount to “ institutionalized isolation ” and fear-mongering that can cause significant emotional and mental harm to children , especially if implemented for weeks or months on end .
Humans need physical contact and social face-to-face interactions , and this is particularly true for children .
At best , these remedies will lead to the creation of a generation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it may stunt their ability to function normally in social situations altogether .
Choices Vary Depending on Where You Live While the AAP and CDC are calling for the reopening of most schools nationwide , parents may face a variety of choices , depending on where they live .
As reported by USA Today:18 In June 12 , 2020 , article19,20 in The New York Times , epidemiologists weighed in on the decision to send children back to school .
Of the 304 epidemiologists that replied to the New York Times ’ survey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said they were ready to send their children back to school somewhere between now and this fall .
Costs May Have Catastrophic Consequences for School Systems On top of everything else , there are financial dilemmas to address .
As noted in a July 9 , 2020 , New York Times article,21,22 school budgets that are already stretched thin are facing million-dollar expenditures if they are to comply with school opening guidelines : As reported by U.S. News,23 some school systems are already feeling the economic pain from the shutdown .
Both state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many areas , some projected to be as high as 25 % , due to lost revenue .
In Massachusetts , 2,000 teachers have already been laid off due to budget cuts , and the National Education Association estimates upward of 700,000 teachers may lose their jobs over the next two years .
Some states are also seeing skyrocketing homeschooling submissions , which further threatens schools ’ funding .
In North Carolina , the online system for filing a Notice of Intent to Establish a Home School temporarily crashed24 due to the influx @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a July 7 , 2020 , report by Life Site.25 I personally find this very encouraging as most educational systems in the U.S. leave much to be desired .
While it certainly is an additional challenge for parents , I am convinced most children will be far better off homeschooled .
Last but certainly not least , many parents worry the wearing of face masks might jeopardize the health of their child by restricting oxygen flow and allowing for the buildup of carbon dioxide with each exhale .
There may indeed be something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s something that none of the health authorities have addressed .
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ( OSHA ) , which is part of the U.S. Department of Labor , requires the oxygen level in a working atmosphere to be above 19.5 % .
Anything below that is considered hazardous to health .
In the video above , which , of course , was banned and removed from YouTube , Del Bigtree shows a video of a man demonstrating how the oxygen concentration — when wearing a surgical mask — can easily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bigtree then conducts a simple carbon dioxide test with his 11-year-old son to check the air quality behind a variety of masks.26 Using a testing device that measures carbon dioxide concentrations in ambient air , Bigtree checks the carbon dioxide concentration behind his son ’ s mask .
With an N95 mask on , the carbon dioxide level spikes above 8,480 parts per million ( ppm ) within seconds .
Above 5,000 ppm , OSHA warns that “ toxicity or oxygen deprivation could occur.
” Carbon dioxide levels between 2,000 ppm and 5,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , poor concentration , loss of attention , increased heart rate , and slight nausea .
The maximum permissible daily exposure limit is 5,000 ppm .
Wearing a standard surgical mask , carbon dioxide levels again reached above 8,000 ppm , although it took longer .
Shockingly , wearing a cloth bandana resulted in carbon dioxide buildup near the nose and mouth exceeding 8,000 ppm .
Even wearing a clear plastic face shield ( without a mask ) resulted in carbon dioxide levels in the 1,500-ppm range , which is associated with drowsiness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ No Scientific Basis for Most of These Measures Unfortunately , many have been swept up in the mainstream media fearmongering that has bombarded us daily for several months , and when government and health officials encourage shaming and reporting those who refuse to succumb to irrationality , it only worsens matters .
The scientific evidence is clear on several points , however .
We now know children are not significant vectors of disease , even when they ’ re infected .
Children are also at virtually zero risks of death when they develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infection mortality rate is now down to a median of about 0.25 % .27 As Stanford University 's disease prevention chairman Dr. John Ioannidis noted in a June 27 , 2020 , interview with Greek Reporter:28,29,30 And , as testing continues , and more people are found to be asymptomatic yet positive , these mortality rates will be driven down even further .
Science also conclusively shows that masks do not protect the wearer against viral infection and do not prevent its spread to others .
This evidence was clearly laid out in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He did a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on masks , concentrating on evidence showing masks can reduce infection risk , especially viral respiratory diseases : Third , we also now know that COVID-19 has not been the devastating pandemic killer it ’ s been made out to be .
When looking at all-cause mortality from year to year , Rancourt found the pandemic has not led to a significant increase in deaths compared to the same time frame in previous years .
To understand why all-cause mortality statistics are crucial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , please review my interview with Rancourt .
Clearly , I ’ m not going to tell you what to do with your children .
The choice to send your children back to school will have to be a personal one .
All I will suggest is to look at some of the statistics and scientific evidence brought forth in this article .
Look up the references , read the studies .
Try to really understand the data .
Chances are , armed with science rather than mainstream media reports , you ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choice , and feel confident in doing so .

By Dr. Joseph Mercola | mercola.com
Children rarely become infected and are far less likely to spread the infection than adults. Scientific evidence also conclusively proves masks do not prevent infection or spread of viruses
Some of the basic recommendations found in the CDC and AAP guidelines include physical distancing on buses and on school grounds, wearing face masks, screening for symptoms, augmented hygiene and disinfection routines, and signage and broadcasts reminding students of disease prevention strategies
Many parents wonder whether the guidelines themselves may do far more harm than good in the long term, as they both unnecessarily frighten and isolate children from natural interactions
The AAP and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have issued guidelines for the “safe reopening” of schools
According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the academic, physical and mental benefits of returning children to school for in-person learning outweigh the potential health risks of COVID-19
According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the academic, physical, and mental benefits of returning children to school for in-person learning outweigh the potential health risks of COVID-19.
To that end, the AAP has issued guidelines for the “safe reopening” of schools. However, many parents wonder whether the guidelines themselves may do far more harm than good in the long term. One parent outlines her concerns in the video above.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has also issued school reopening guidelines1 in anticipation of nationwide reopening. Unicef2 also supports students’ re-entry into schools, noting that reopenings should “be consistent with each country’s overall COVID-19 health response to protect students, staff, teachers, and their families.”
American Academy of Pediatrics Calls for School Reopenings
As noted in the AAP’s guidance for school re-entry:3,4
“The importance of in-person learning is well-documented, and there is already evidence of the negative impacts on children because of school closures in the spring of 2020.
Lengthy time away from school and associated interruption of supportive services often results in social isolation, making it difficult for schools to identify and address important learning deficits as well as child and adolescent physical or sexual abuse, substance use, depression, and suicidal ideation.
This, in turn, places children and adolescents at considerable risk of morbidity and, in some cases, mortality. Beyond the educational impact and social impact of school closures, there has been substantial impact on food security and physical activity for children and families.”
Children Rarely Transmit COVID-19
AAP points out that, unlike the influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2 does not appear to spread easily among children and teens. Indeed, studies from the U.S.,5 Israel6 and the Netherlands7 have demonstrated that children are far less likely to become infected than adults, and far less likely than adults to transmit the virus to others.
In one such study,8 children accounted for just 13% of transmissions within households. Other found9 children under the age of 4 were 47% less likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to adults in the same household.
July 2020 study10 looking at COVID-19 in children and the dynamics of infection within families found only 0.9% of COVID-19-positive patients were under the age of 16, and in just 8% of cases did a child within the household develop symptoms before an adult. Science Daily11 also cites a number of other studies confirming the theory that children are rare disease vectors when it comes to COVID-19:
“In a French study, a boy with Covid-19 exposed over 80 classmates at three schools to the disease. None contracted it. Transmission of other respiratory diseases, including influenza transmission, was common at the schools.
In a study in New South Wales, nine infected students and nine staff across 15 schools exposed a total of 735 students and 128 staff to Covid-19. Only two secondary infections resulted, one transmitted by an adult to a child.
‘The data are striking,’ said Dr. [William V.] Raszka. ‘The key takeaway is that children are not driving the pandemic. After six months, we have a wealth of accumulating data showing that children are less likely to become infected and seem less infectious; it is congregating adults who aren't following safety protocols who are responsible for driving the upward curve.’”
Originally, school closings were based on the premise that the virus responsible for COVID-19 would behave like other respiratory viruses, but since it doesn’t, returning children to school is unlikely to pose a significant risk to health.
“ … the preponderance of evidence indicates that children and adolescents are less likely to be symptomatic and less likely to have severe disease resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, children may be less likely to become infected and to spread infection,” AAP notes,12 adding that:
“Policies to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 within schools must be balanced with the known harms to children, adolescents, families, and the community by keeping children at home.”
Guidelines Promote ‘Institutionalized Isolation’
As mentioned, the CDC has also issued guidelines13 for the re-opening of schools. While the CDC and AAP guidelines are very similar, the AAP’s restrictions tend to be a bit more flexible.
For example, while both call for social distancing with 6 feet between each student at all times, the AAP concedes that this may not always be feasible, and if not, spacing can be 3 feet if students wear face masks and are asymptomatic. Still, as noted in the featured video, students are likely to be just as scared as having to follow COVID-19 prevention guidelines as they are staying at home.
While the exact measures vary depending on the age of the students, some of the basic recommendations found in the CDC and AAP guidelines include:14,15,16,17
Physical distancing — Students must sit apart on the school bus; desks must be spaced 6 feet apart and face in the same direction; floor markings will indicate “safe distancing” from the teacher’s desk and other areas where lines are formed; plexiglass barriers will be used in workspaces where physical distancing cannot be achieved; congregation in shared spaces, including playgrounds and cafeterias, is to be discouraged for students and teachers alike; hallways are to be trafficked in one way only to minimize face to face interaction; students may not share school supplies; nonessential visitors, including parents, are discouraged from entering the school, and field trips are to be replaced with virtual events.
Students must sit apart on the school bus; desks must be spaced 6 feet apart and face in the same direction; floor markings will indicate “safe distancing” from the teacher’s desk and other areas where lines are formed; plexiglass barriers will be used in workspaces where physical distancing cannot be achieved; congregation in shared spaces, including playgrounds and cafeterias, is to be discouraged for students and teachers alike; hallways are to be trafficked in one way only to minimize face to face interaction; students may not share school supplies; nonessential visitors, including parents, are discouraged from entering the school, and field trips are to be replaced with virtual events. Face covering — Teachers and students are to wear face coverings at all times.
Teachers and students are to wear face coverings at all times. Symptom screening — Symptom screening such as temperature checks should ideally be made by parents before dropping the child off at the bus stop or at school. Staff or students with a temperature above 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit will not be permitted in school.
Symptom screening such as temperature checks should ideally be made by parents before dropping the child off at the bus stop or at school. Staff or students with a temperature above 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit will not be permitted in school. Disinfection — Hand hygiene, use of disinfectant, and regular cleaning of surfaces must be adhered to.
Hand hygiene, use of disinfectant, and regular cleaning of surfaces must be adhered to. Signage and broadcasts — Signs are to be posted in various areas, such as entrances and bathrooms, promoting protective measures to minimize the spread of pathogens, and announcements are to be broadcast over loudspeakers and/or video screens informing students of the same.
As noted in the featured video, these guidelines amount to “institutionalized isolation” and fear-mongering that can cause significant emotional and mental harm to children, especially if implemented for weeks or months on end.
Humans need physical contact and social face-to-face interactions, and this is particularly true for children. At best, these remedies will lead to the creation of a generation of fearful germophobes. At worst, it may stunt their ability to function normally in social situations altogether.
Choices Vary Depending on Where You Live
While the AAP and CDC are calling for the reopening of most schools nationwide, parents may face a variety of choices, depending on where they live. As reported by USA Today:18
“In just two examples, the Nashville, Tennessee public school system recently offered parents a choice between sending their children back to school full time or keeping them at home for online classes, while Fairfax County, Virginia public schools are making families choose between fully online schooling or a ‘hybrid’ that combines in-person and remote instruction.”
In June 12, 2020, article19,20 in The New York Times, epidemiologists weighed in on the decision to send children back to school. Of the 304 epidemiologists that replied to the New York Times’ survey, a majority — 70% — said they were ready to send their children back to school somewhere between now and this fall.
Costs May Have Catastrophic Consequences for School Systems
On top of everything else, there are financial dilemmas to address. As noted in a July 9, 2020, New York Times article,21,22 school budgets that are already stretched thin are facing million-dollar expenditures if they are to comply with school opening guidelines:
“Bus monitors to screen students for symptoms in Marietta, Ga.: $640,000. Protective gear and classroom cleaning equipment for a small district in rural Michigan: $100,000. Disinfecting school buildings and hiring extra nurses and educators in San Diego: $90 million …
Exactly how much money the nation’s schools need to reopen is a matter of debate, complicated by the conflicting, sometimes shifting advice and guidelines that administrators have received from government agencies and medical authorities …
Regardless of which recommendations are followed, reopening schools will require changes. An average-size district of 3,700 students can expect $1.8 million in pandemic-related costs for 2020-21, representing 3 to 4 percent of a typical annual budget, according to an estimate from AASA, the School Superintendents Association …
But some experts have suggested that much of what schools are planning for the fall, such as checking students’ symptoms before they board buses or enter schools, is unnecessary, akin to the type of ‘security theater’ Americans became accustomed to after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 — reassuring, but often providing only superficial protection.”
As reported by U.S. News,23 some school systems are already feeling the economic pain from the shutdown. Both state and local budget cuts are expected in many areas, some projected to be as high as 25%, due to lost revenue.
In Massachusetts, 2,000 teachers have already been laid off due to budget cuts, and the National Education Association estimates upward of 700,000 teachers may lose their jobs over the next two years.
Some states are also seeing skyrocketing homeschooling submissions, which further threatens schools’ funding. In North Carolina, the online system for filing a Notice of Intent to Establish a Home School temporarily crashed24 due to the influx of NOIs being filed, according to a July 7, 2020, report by Life Site.25
I personally find this very encouraging as most educational systems in the U.S. leave much to be desired. While it certainly is an additional challenge for parents, I am convinced most children will be far better off homeschooled.
Mask Test Reveals Hazardous Carbon Dioxide Levels
Last but certainly not least, many parents worry the wearing of face masks might jeopardize the health of their child by restricting oxygen flow and allowing for the buildup of carbon dioxide with each exhale. There may indeed be something to this concern, and it’s something that none of the health authorities have addressed.
With an N95 mask on, the carbon dioxide level spikes above 8,480 parts per million (ppm) within seconds. Above 5,000 ppm, OSHA warns that “toxicity or oxygen deprivation could occur.”
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which is part of the U.S. Department of Labor, requires the oxygen level in a working atmosphere to be above 19.5%. Anything below that is considered hazardous to health.
In the video above, which, of course, was banned and removed from YouTube, Del Bigtree shows a video of a man demonstrating how the oxygen concentration — when wearing a surgical mask — can easily drop below OSHA air quality standards.
Bigtree then conducts a simple carbon dioxide test with his 11-year-old son to check the air quality behind a variety of masks.26 Using a testing device that measures carbon dioxide concentrations in ambient air, Bigtree checks the carbon dioxide concentration behind his son’s mask.
With an N95 mask on, the carbon dioxide level spikes above 8,480 parts per million (ppm) within seconds. Above 5,000 ppm, OSHA warns that “toxicity or oxygen deprivation could occur.”
Carbon dioxide levels between 2,000 ppm and 5,000 ppm are associated with headaches, sleepiness, poor concentration, loss of attention, increased heart rate, and slight nausea. The maximum permissible daily exposure limit is 5,000 ppm.
Wearing a standard surgical mask, carbon dioxide levels again reached above 8,000 ppm, although it took longer. Shockingly, wearing a cloth bandana resulted in carbon dioxide buildup near the nose and mouth exceeding 8,000 ppm.
Even wearing a clear plastic face shield (without a mask) resulted in carbon dioxide levels in the 1,500-ppm range, which is associated with drowsiness and poor air quality.
There Is No Scientific Basis for Most of These Measures
Unfortunately, many have been swept up in the mainstream media fearmongering that has bombarded us daily for several months, and when government and health officials encourage shaming and reporting those who refuse to succumb to irrationality, it only worsens matters.
The scientific evidence is clear on several points, however. We now know children are not significant vectors of disease, even when they’re infected. Children are also at virtually zero risks of death when they develop symptoms.
Even among adults, the infection mortality rate is now down to a median of about 0.25%.27 As Stanford University's disease prevention chairman Dr. John Ioannidis noted in a June 27, 2020, interview with Greek Reporter:28,29,30
“For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%. For 45 to 70, it is probably about 0.05-0.3%. For those above 70, it escalates substantially, to 1% or higher for those over 85.”
And, as testing continues, and more people are found to be asymptomatic yet positive, these mortality rates will be driven down even further. Science also conclusively shows that masks do not protect the wearer against viral infection and do not prevent its spread to others.
This evidence was clearly laid out in my interview with Denis Rancourt, Ph.D. He did a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on masks, concentrating on evidence showing masks can reduce infection risk, especially viral respiratory diseases:
“What I found when I looked at all the randomized controlled trials31,32 with verified outcome, meaning you actually measure whether or not the person was infected … NONE of these well-designed studies that are intended to remove observational bias … found there was a statistically significant advantage of wearing a mask versus not wearing a mask.
Likewise, there was no detectable difference between respirators and surgical masks. That to me was a clear sign that the science was telling us they could not detect a positive utility of masks in this application.
We're talking many really [high-]quality trials. What this means — and this is very important — is that if there was any significant advantage to wearing a mask to reduce this [infection] risk, then you would have detected that in at least one of these trials, [yet] there's no sign of it.
That to me is a firm scientific conclusion: There is no evidence that masks are of any utility either preventing the aerosol particles from coming out or from going in. You're not helping the people around you by wearing a mask, and you're not helping yourself preventing the disease by wearing a mask.”
Third, we also now know that COVID-19 has not been the devastating pandemic killer it’s been made out to be. When looking at all-cause mortality from year to year, Rancourt found the pandemic has not led to a significant increase in deaths compared to the same time frame in previous years. To understand why all-cause mortality statistics are crucial for understanding the impact of this pandemic, please review my interview with Rancourt.
Clearly, I’m not going to tell you what to do with your children. The choice to send your children back to school will have to be a personal one. All I will suggest is to look at some of the statistics and scientific evidence brought forth in this article.
Look up the references, read the studies. Try to really understand the data. Chances are, armed with science rather than mainstream media reports, you’ll be better equipped to make your choice, and feel confident in doing so.


consciouslifenews--2020-07-24--Morning Inspiration: Have A True Vision For Who You Really Are (Motivational Video)

Look at yourself and face the fears , doubts and uncertainties in your life .
Once you have dealt with @ @ @ @ @ that you can do better and overcome .
Do n't let your doubts of what @ @ @ @ @ of what can be .
“ When you do n't have a true appreciation and @ @ @ @ @ and you allow yourself to be immobilized by fear , what happens in the process @ @ @ @ @ abuse yourself .
You begin to sabotage your life .
You begin to sabotage your @ @ @ @ @ unconsciously work against yourself.
” Les Brown Tags : `` featured , doing impossible things @ @ @ @ @ true vision , how to face failure , how to face fears , what you @ @

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.


consciouslifenews--2020-07-24--Contact Lenses vs LASIK in Singapore – Which one should I choose?

We prefer the convenience clear vision can give us , but we weren ’ t all blessed with the gift of 20/20 vision .
In fact , at least a whopping 80 % of the Singapore population is myopic .
[ 1 ] Of course , we can always turn to borrowed vision – by relying on our clunky spectacles or the seemingly god-send contact lenses to regain our vision .
Technology also offers the permanent solution to our less-than-perfect-vision woes in the form of LASIK ( laser eye surgery ) .
Weighing the risks of contact lenses vs LASIK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do LASIK in Singapore .
You might be thinking , after all , LASIK is a surgery – so it ’ s got to be more dangerous than contact lenses , right ?
This may not necessarily be true !
In fact , it has been found that the risks of wearing contact lenses may ‘ snowball ’ over time , far outweighing the danger of LASIK .
[ 2 ] The complications of the surgery mostly occur over a brief period of time – such as post-surgery eye infection , corneal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Given the current technology level , LASIK is a safe and trustworthy procedure in the majority of cases .
Needless to say , this risk can be mitigated by applying the prescribed eye drops and carefully following your eye surgeon ’ s instructions post-surgery .
However , putting on your lenses over the long-term is potentially risky and the risk accumulates over the long-term .
What dangers could contact lenses possibly pose ?
One of the most serious complications could possibly be bacterial keratitis , which may end up in near-blindness in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risks are even greater with the improper use of contact lenses – such as sleeping in them and not washing your hands prior .
Travelling can be a hassle with contact lenses .
LASIK makes your travels more convenient and fun !
After LASIK , gone are the days when you would have to rely on your contact lenses .
You can officially cross off contact lens solutions , contact lens casing and spectacles from your packing list !
You can save that luggage space for your overseas hauls instead !
If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , imagine how convenient mountain hiking would be without your contacts !
Finally , you can travel light and save the trouble of putting on your contacts every morning .
Enjoy the breath-taking sceneries with your naked eye after LASIK !
LASIK is a one-time investment .
Whereas , you may need to spend more over the long run if you are wearing contact lenses .
You may feel the pinch if you were to fork out the one-time cost of LASIK in Singapore .
However , if you were to calculate your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dailies ) , you would be surprised that it is much more expensive over the long run !
[ 3 ] If you are wearing both glasses & contact lenses , add on the cost of spectacles to that amount as well !
P.S .
Many LASIK clinics in Singapore even offer 6 or 12 months installment plans when you make payment using your Singapore issued credit cards .
[ 1 ] Seet B , Wong TY , Tan DTH , et al ( 2001 ) .
Myopia in Singapore : taking a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ophthalmology .
85:521-526 [ 3 ] Seet J .
( 2018 ) .
The Ultimate Comparison : Is Lasik Worth The Money , from https : //blog.seedly.sg/the-ultimate-comparison-is-lasik-worth-the-money/

We prefer the convenience clear vision can give us, but we weren’t all blessed with the gift of 20/20 vision. In fact, at least a whopping 80% of the Singapore population is myopic. [1]
Of course, we can always turn to borrowed vision – by relying on our clunky spectacles or the seemingly god-send contact lenses to regain our vision. Technology also offers the permanent solution to our less-than-perfect-vision woes in the form of LASIK (laser eye surgery).
Weighing the risks of contact lenses vs LASIK
For those of you who are thinking to do LASIK in Singapore. You might be thinking, after all, LASIK is a surgery – so it’s got to be more dangerous than contact lenses, right? This may not necessarily be true! In fact, it has been found that the risks of wearing contact lenses may ‘snowball’ over time, far outweighing the danger of LASIK. [2]
The complications of the surgery mostly occur over a brief period of time – such as post-surgery eye infection, corneal haze, haloes, glares, etc. Given the current technology level, LASIK is a safe and trustworthy procedure in the majority of cases. Needless to say, this risk can be mitigated by applying the prescribed eye drops and carefully following your eye surgeon’s instructions post-surgery.
However, putting on your lenses over the long-term is potentially risky and the risk accumulates over the long-term. What dangers could contact lenses possibly pose? One of the most serious complications could possibly be bacterial keratitis, which may end up in near-blindness in 5% of the cases. The risks are even greater with the improper use of contact lenses – such as sleeping in them and not washing your hands prior.
Travelling can be a hassle with contact lenses. LASIK makes your travels more convenient and fun!
After LASIK, gone are the days when you would have to rely on your contact lenses. You can officially cross off contact lens solutions, contact lens casing and spectacles from your packing list! You can save that luggage space for your overseas hauls instead!
If you are a lover of the great outdoors, imagine how convenient mountain hiking would be without your contacts! Finally, you can travel light and save the trouble of putting on your contacts every morning. Enjoy the breath-taking sceneries with your naked eye after LASIK!
LASIK is a one-time investment. Whereas, you may need to spend more over the long run if you are wearing contact lenses.
You may feel the pinch if you were to fork out the one-time cost of LASIK in Singapore. However, if you were to calculate your spending on contact lenses (especially the dailies), you would be surprised that it is much more expensive over the long run! [3] If you are wearing both glasses & contact lenses, add on the cost of spectacles to that amount as well!
Estimated spending over a period of 10 years:
LASIK: $3,600 – $6,000
Contact Lenses: $7,000 – $10,000
Spectacles: $1,500 – $5,000
P.S. Many LASIK clinics in Singapore even offer 6 or 12 months installment plans when you make payment using your Singapore issued credit cards.
References:
[1] Seet B, Wong TY, Tan DTH, et al (2001). Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 85:521-526
[2] Mathers WD, Fraunfelder FW, Rich LF (2006). Risk of Lasik Surgery vs Contact Lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 124(10):1510–1511. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.10.1510-b
[3] Seet J. (2018). The Ultimate Comparison: Is Lasik Worth The Money, from https://blog.seedly.sg/the-ultimate-comparison-is-lasik-worth-the-money/


consciouslifenews--2020-07-27--Is Your Third Eye Money Lens Healthy?

Is Your Third Eye Money Lens Healthy?

This is part of a series I shot with The Mindful Millionaire author , Leisa Peterson .
In this video ( # 6 ) we ’ re looking at the core belief of the third eye chakra and how it affects your prosperity .
If you haven ’ t seen the other videos of this series , please check them out here : Your third eye chakra is your highest chakra .
Its Sanskrit name is “ ajna ” which means “ command.
” And it ’ s like the command center of your body .
The consciousness here is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pingala ) and feminine ( Ida ) energy channels move up your chakras and unite at the third eye .
In other words , the duality of your chakra energies come into unity here .
This creates a feeling of equanimity , connection , and feminine wisdom .
So it shouldn ’ t be surprising that after years of working with financial clients , Leisa Peterson has come to see the Third Eye financial perspective as the .
It ’ s here that you experience your “ enoughness ” — or not-enoughness — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The latter is a quality of the personality self .
Enoughness goes beyond feeling worthy or not worthy .
So what does it look like when you deal with money from an overactive third eye chakra ?
According to Leisa , it leads to far too much reliance on spiritual tools like intuition , synchronicities , and crystal balls when making financial decisions .
This means logic , statistics , and other real-world aspects like research get left in the dust .
And of course , an underactive third eye chakra leads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reliance on numbers , trends , and the logic of all that .
And this leaves little or no room for your intuition , synchronicities , and your heart ’ s deepest desires .
The key is to balance these two .
You want to tap into your intuition and deepest integrity in regard to your financial life while also doing your research , listening to real-world advice , and keeping both feet firmly on the ground .
Where do you fall in the spectrum ?
Just feeling into this question and bringing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heal and balance your integrative money lens .
And if you want to do some healing work on your third eye chakra , here are a bunch of videos for that .
May your week be full of financial ahas and expanded prosperity !
Much love and many blessings , For super easy ( and beautiful ! )
chakra healing , try my Chakra Boosters Healing Tattoos .
I created them because getting a real root chakra tattoo positively shifted my whole life and I want the same for you — without the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Discover your personal Chakra Abundance Type FREE here .
To stay connected and inspired , Visit my Chakra Boosters Facebook and catch new videos EVERY TUESDAY on my Chakra Boosters Youtube channel .
xoxo Tags : `` featured , featured , heal third eye chakra , healthy third eye money lens , Leisa Peterson , Leisa Peterson on third eye , Leisa Peterson on third eye money lens , third eye money lens , third-eye chakra , Vicki Howie , Vicki Howie on third eye chakra , Vickie Howie on third eye money @

This is part of a series I shot with The Mindful Millionaire author, Leisa Peterson. In this video (#6) we’re looking at the core belief of the third eye chakra and how it affects your prosperity.
If you haven’t seen the other videos of this series, please check them out here:
ROOT CHAKRA MONEY LENS
SACRAL CHAKRA MONEY LENS
SOLAR PLEXUS CHAKRA MONEY LENS
HEART CHAKRA MONEY LENS
THROAT CHAKRA MONEY LENS
Your third eye chakra is your highest embodied chakra. Its Sanskrit name is “ajna” which means “command.” And it’s like the command center of your body. The consciousness here is full and wise. Your masculine (Pingala) and feminine (Ida) energy channels move up your chakras and unite at the third eye.
In other words, the duality of your chakra energies come into unity here. This creates a feeling of equanimity, connection, and feminine wisdom.
So it shouldn’t be surprising that after years of working with financial clients, Leisa Peterson has come to see the Third Eye financial perspective as the integrative lens.
It’s here that you experience your “enoughness” — or not-enoughness — financially.
Enoughness is different than worthiness. The latter is a quality of the personality self. Enoughness goes beyond feeling worthy or not worthy.
Overactive Third Eye Chakra Money Lens
So what does it look like when you deal with money from an overactive third eye chakra?
According to Leisa, it leads to far too much reliance on spiritual tools like intuition, synchronicities, and crystal balls when making financial decisions. This means logic, statistics, and other real-world aspects like research get left in the dust.
Underactive Third Eye Chakra Money Lens
And of course, an underactive third eye chakra leads to the opposite — far too much reliance on numbers, trends, and the logic of all that. And this leaves little or no room for your intuition, synchronicities, and your heart’s deepest desires.
The key is to balance these two. You want to tap into your intuition and deepest integrity in regard to your financial life while also doing your research, listening to real-world advice, and keeping both feet firmly on the ground.
Where do you fall in the spectrum?
Just feeling into this question and bringing honest awareness to it will begin to heal and balance your integrative money lens.
And if you want to do some healing work on your third eye chakra, here are a bunch of videos for that.
May your week be full of financial ahas and expanded prosperity!
Much love and many blessings,
For super easy (and beautiful!) chakra healing, try my Chakra Boosters Healing Tattoos. I created them because getting a real root chakra tattoo positively shifted my whole life and I want the same for you — without the permanent part! Want more prosperity? Discover your personal Chakra Abundance Type FREE here. To stay connected and inspired, Visit my Chakra Boosters Facebook and catch new videos EVERY TUESDAY on my Chakra Boosters Youtube channel. xoxo


consciouslifenews--2020-07-27--Extreme Off-Grid Living in a 4 Season Tent & Tiny Truck Camper

Brian Galyon has been living off the grid full-time with his dog Sierra since 2015 .
In the summer he @ @ @ @ @ a 4×4 Toyota Tacoma pickup truck with a DIY slide-out extension , and in the @ @ @ @ @ Big Horn III outfitter-style tent with a wood stove .
At the start of his @ @ @ @ @ odd-jobs as a ranch hand , landscaping , and doing trail work , but now @ @ @ @ @ a digital nomad with his YouTube channel , Off-Grid Backcountry Adventures .