consciouslifenews--2020-10-31--Morning Inspiration: What Doesn’t Kill You Makes You Stronger (Motivational Video)

Throughout life you will face various challenges and obstacles .
The key to overcoming them is to realize they are @ @ @ @ @ and that you can face them , learn from them and grow .
“ You @ @ @ @ @ it makes you grow and it makes you stronger .
So what does n't kill @ @ @ @ @ And this is something that will make me stronger .
We can either run from @ @ @ @ @ our adversity head on , and conquer it and that 's what I plan to @ @ @ @ @ it , I 'll take it on the chin and I 'll carry on , @ @ @ @ @ McGregor Tags : `` featured , Conor McGregor , featured , how to grow during @ @ @ @ @ adversity , how to overcome challenges , morning inspiration

“You should celebrate all adversity because it makes you grow and it makes you stronger. So what doesn't kill you makes you stronger. And this is something that will make me stronger. We can either run from adversity or we can face our adversity head on, and conquer it and that's what I plan to do. I'll face it, I'll take it on the chin and I'll carry on, I'll learn.” Conor McGregor
FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-01--Science Confirms Edgar Cayce’s Writings of Ancient Events

FAIR USE NOTICE .
Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner .
We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues , human rights , economic and political democracy , and issues of social justice .
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use ' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news reporting , teaching , scholarship , and research .
If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use ' ... you must obtain permission from the copyright owner .
And , if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed , let us know via the `` Contact Us '' link at the top of the site , and we will promptly remove it .
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for professional advice of any kind .
Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material .
Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms .
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors .
No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied .

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the articles on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.
The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.
Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-01--Humpbacks Might Be the Superheroes of the Sea


consciouslifenews--2020-11-01--Why COVID-19 Is Not the 3rd Leading Cause of Death

Medical treatments showing significant promise have also been censored and even barred from use based on falsified and seriously flawed studies , thereby raising the death toll According to the CDC , only 6 % of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate Many who died from COVID-19 were victims of medical error .
As of May 2020 , 42 % of all COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. had also occurred in nursing homes , primarily in states where governors had forced long-term care facilities to accept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mistake Research shows anywhere from 250,000 to 440,000 Americans die each year from preventable medical errors , far more than COVID-19 , especially if you exclude those with comorbidities .
While unrecognized , medical errors have , for many years , been the third leading cause of death According to Dr. Thomas Frieden , former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , COVID-19 is the third leading cause of death in the U.S. , having killed 170,000 of the 5.4 million Americans who had tested positive as of August @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , COVID-19 is now the third leading cause of death in the U.S. , killing more Americans than “ accidents , injuries , lung disease , diabetes , Alzheimer 's and many , many other causes.
” 1,2 This claim is said to be based on data from Johns Hopkins University which , at the time Frieden made that statement in August 2020 , reported that about 170,000 of the 5.4 million Americans who had tested positive had died.3 At the time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the U.S. has recorded 7,916,099 positive tests and 216,872 COVID-19-related deaths .
There are many reasons not to panic over Frieden 's claim .
I 'll review mortality statistics in just a moment but , first , I want to highlight a leading cause of death that continues to be swept under the proverbial rug , namely medical errors , because medical errors also play a role in the death toll attributed to COVID-19 .
In 2016 , a Johns Hopkins study5,6 found more than 250,000 Americans die each year from preventable medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ third leading cause of death in the U.S .
I reported these findings in “ Medical Errors : Still the Third Leading Cause of Death.
” In 2017 , medical mistakes were found to affect 1 in 5 people .
Common examples of medical mistakes included receiving the wrong medication , having the wrong procedure done , waking up during surgery , or acquiring a hospital-related infection .
Another research7 has estimated the number of Americans dying from medical mistakes may actually be as high as 440,000 .
The reason for the discrepancy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are rarely noted on death certificates , and death certificates are what the CDC relies on to compile its death statistics .
As a result , the severity of the problem goes unnoticed .
Either way , whether it 's 250,000 or 440,000 , medical errors still claim more lives than COVID-19 has , and it does so on an annual basis .
We also need to remember that a large portion of those who died from COVID-19 were in fact victims of medical errors .
As I reported in “ Nurse on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and “ Frontline Nurse Speaks Out About Lethal Protocols , ” Elmhurst Hospital Center in Queens , New York — which was “ the epicenter of the epicenter ” of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. — grossly mistreated COVID-19 patients , causing their death.8 According to Army trained nurse , Erin Olszewski , who worked at Elmhurst during the height of the pandemic , hospital administrators and doctors made a long list of errors , most egregious of which was to place all COVID-19 patients , including those merely suspected of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than less invasive oxygen administration .
During her time there , most patients who entered the hospital wound up being treated for COVID-19 , whether they tested positive or not , and only one patient survived .
The hospital also failed to segregate COVID-positive and COVID-negative patients , thereby ensuring the maximum spread of the disease among noninfected patients coming in with other health problems .
By ventilating COVID-19-negative patients , the hospital artificially inflated the caseload and death rate .
Disturbingly , financial incentives appear to have been at play .
According @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 29,000 extra for a COVID-19 patient receiving ventilation , over and above other treatments .
In August 2020 , CDC director Robert Redfield admitted that hospital incentives likely elevated hospitalization rates and death toll statistics around the country .
Another major error that drove up the death toll was state leadership 's decision to place infected patients into nursing homes , against federal guidelines.9 According to an analysis10,11 by the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity , which included data reported by May 22 , 2020 , an average of 42 % of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ occurred in nursing homes , assisted living , and other long-term care facilities .
This is extraordinary , considering this group accounts for just 0.62 % of the population .
By and large , nursing homes are ill-equipped to care for COVID-19 infected patients.12 While they 're set up to care for elderly patients — whether they are generally healthy or have chronic health problems — these facilities are rarely equipped to quarantine and care for people with highly infectious diseases .
It 's logical to assume that comingling infected patients with noninfected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in exaggerated death rates , as the elderly are far more prone to die from any infection , including the common cold .
We also learned , early on , that the elderly were disproportionately vulnerable to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection .
Yet ordering infected patients into nursing homes with the most vulnerable population of all is exactly what several Democrat governors decided to do , including New York Gov .
Andrew Cuomo,13 Pennsylvania Gov .
Tom Wolf , New Jersey Gov .
Phil Murphy , Michigan Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer , and California @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an investigation14 June 16 , 2020 , comparing a New York nursing home that followed Cuomo 's misguided order with one that refused , opting to follow the federal guidelines instead .
The difference was stark .
By June 18 , the Diamond Hill nursing home — which followed Cuomo 's directive — had lost 18 residents to COVID-19 , thanks to lack of isolation and inadequate infection control .
Half the staff ( about 50 people ) and 58 patients were infected and fell ill .
In comparison , Van Rensselaer Manor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same county as Diamond Hill , which refused to follow the state 's directive and did not admit any patient suspected of having COVID-19 , did not have a single COVID-19 death .
A similar trend has been observed in other areas .
If it were n't for systematic medical mistreatment at certain hospitals and incomprehensible decision-making by a handful of state governors , the COVID-19 death toll may well have been negligible .
We should also remember that a ) the vast majority of people died with SARS-CoV-2 infection , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatments showing significant promise have been savagely censored and even barred from use based on falsified and seriously flawed studies .
According to groundbreaking data15 released by the CDC on August 26 , 2020 , only 6 % of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate .
Six percent of 201,141 ( the total death toll reported by the CDC as of October 14 , 2020 ) is 12,068 .
In other words , SARS-CoV-2 infection was directly responsible for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals .
The remaining 94 % had an average of 2.6 health conditions that contributed to their deaths .
When you add all of these factors together — the wanton mismanagement of the infection in hotspots such as New York , the decision to send infected patients into nursing homes , the fact that few healthy people died from the infection and that potential medical treatments have been and still are actively suppressed — it kind of starts to look like a manufactured crisis .
Infection Fatality on Par With the Flu While @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 is the third leading cause of death , and Scientific American is calling the claim that its fatality is on par with the flu “ fake news , ” 16 I would call your attention to research looking at the fatality ratio for the average person , excluding those residing in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities .
The September 2 , 2020 , article17 in Annals of Internal Medicine points out that , because many who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 remain asymptomatic it 's very difficult to estimate the true @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rates based on confirmed “ cases ” ( meaning positive tests ) you end up overestimating the infection fatality ratio .
As explained by the authors:18 The estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza listed in this paper is 0.8 % .
Other sources put it a little higher .
In either case , according to this paper , the only people for whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is more dangerous than influenza are those over the age of 60 .
All others have a lower risk of dying from COVID-19 than they have of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way , if you 're under the age of 60 , your chance of dying from the flu is greater than your chance of dying from COVID-19 .
White House coronavirus task force coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx also confirmed this far lower than typically reported mortality rate when she , in mid-August 2020 , stated that it “ becomes more and more difficult ” to get people to comply with mask rules “ when people start to realize that 99 % of us are going to be fine.
” 19 In addition to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the flu ( again for the average person under the age of 60 ) : • Data , shows the overall all-cause mortality has remained steady during 2020 and does n't veer from the norm .
In other words , COVID-19 has not killed off more of the population than would have died in any given year anyway • Several studies , , , , , , , also suggest immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection is far more widespread than anyone imagined • The threshold for herd immunity appears to be far lower than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported by British Sky News,35 October 7 , 2020 , respected scientists are now calling for a herd immunity approach to the pandemic , meaning governments should allow people who are not at a significant risk of serious COVID-19 illness to go back to normal life .
As of October 18 , 2020 , The Great Barrington Declaration36 had been signed by 10,601 medical and public health scientists and 29,296 medical practitioners.37 At this stage in the game , there 's plenty of cause for optimism .
In addition to data showing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ initially suspected , we now have a number of safe and effective treatments .
Two that I would place toward the top of the list are : Lastly , there 's overwhelming evidence showing that those with adequate vitamin D levels are far less likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 , less likely to develop symptoms if infected , and less likely to suffer complications , serious illness , or death .
Overall , optimizing your vitamin D level appears to be a foundational strategy to minimize your risk .
To learn more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ StopCOVIDCold.com .
There , you can also find a quick COVID-19 risk quiz to help you assess your general risk .

By Dr. Joseph Mercola | mercola.com
Medical treatments showing significant promise have also been censored and even barred from use based on falsified and seriously flawed studies, thereby raising the death toll
According to the CDC, only 6% of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate
Many who died from COVID-19 were victims of medical error. As of May 2020, 42% of all COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. had also occurred in nursing homes, primarily in states where governors had forced long-term care facilities to accept infected patients, which is yet another mistake
Research shows anywhere from 250,000 to 440,000 Americans die each year from preventable medical errors, far more than COVID-19, especially if you exclude those with comorbidities. While unrecognized, medical errors have, for many years, been the third leading cause of death
According to Dr. Thomas Frieden, former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 is the third leading cause of death in the U.S., having killed 170,000 of the 5.4 million Americans who had tested positive as of August 2020
According to Dr. Thomas Frieden, former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 is now the third leading cause of death in the U.S., killing more Americans than “accidents, injuries, lung disease, diabetes, Alzheimer's and many, many other causes.”1,2
This claim is said to be based on data from Johns Hopkins University which, at the time Frieden made that statement in August 2020, reported that about 170,000 of the 5.4 million Americans who had tested positive had died.3 At the time of this writing, Johns Hopkins reports4 the U.S. has recorded 7,916,099 positive tests and 216,872 COVID-19-related deaths.
Medical Errors Dwarf COVID-19 Concerns
There are many reasons not to panic over Frieden's claim. I'll review mortality statistics in just a moment but, first, I want to highlight a leading cause of death that continues to be swept under the proverbial rug, namely medical errors, because medical errors also play a role in the death toll attributed to COVID-19.
In 2016, a Johns Hopkins study5,6 found more than 250,000 Americans die each year from preventable medical errors, effectively making modern medicine the third leading cause of death in the U.S. I reported these findings in “Medical Errors: Still the Third Leading Cause of Death.”
In 2017, medical mistakes were found to affect 1 in 5 people. Common examples of medical mistakes included receiving the wrong medication, having the wrong procedure done, waking up during surgery, or acquiring a hospital-related infection.
Another research7 has estimated the number of Americans dying from medical mistakes may actually be as high as 440,000. The reason for the discrepancy in the numbers is because medical errors are rarely noted on death certificates, and death certificates are what the CDC relies on to compile its death statistics.
As a result, the severity of the problem goes unnoticed. Either way, whether it's 250,000 or 440,000, medical errors still claim more lives than COVID-19 has, and it does so on an annual basis.
Medical Errors Responsible for Most COVID-19 Deaths
We also need to remember that a large portion of those who died from COVID-19 were in fact victims of medical errors. As I reported in “Nurse on the Frontlines of COVID-19 Shares Her Experience” and “Frontline Nurse Speaks Out About Lethal Protocols,” Elmhurst Hospital Center in Queens, New York — which was “the epicenter of the epicenter” of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. — grossly mistreated COVID-19 patients, causing their death.8
According to Army trained nurse, Erin Olszewski, who worked at Elmhurst during the height of the pandemic, hospital administrators and doctors made a long list of errors, most egregious of which was to place all COVID-19 patients, including those merely suspected of having COVID-19, on mechanical ventilation rather than less invasive oxygen administration.
During her time there, most patients who entered the hospital wound up being treated for COVID-19, whether they tested positive or not, and only one patient survived. The hospital also failed to segregate COVID-positive and COVID-negative patients, thereby ensuring the maximum spread of the disease among noninfected patients coming in with other health problems.
By ventilating COVID-19-negative patients, the hospital artificially inflated the caseload and death rate. Disturbingly, financial incentives appear to have been at play. According to Olszewski, the hospital received $29,000 extra for a COVID-19 patient receiving ventilation, over and above other treatments. In August 2020, CDC director Robert Redfield admitted that hospital incentives likely elevated hospitalization rates and death toll statistics around the country.
Irresponsible State Leadership Caused Many COVID-19 Deaths
Another major error that drove up the death toll was state leadership's decision to place infected patients into nursing homes, against federal guidelines.9 According to an analysis10,11 by the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, which included data reported by May 22, 2020, an average of 42% of all COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. had occurred in nursing homes, assisted living, and other long-term care facilities.
This is extraordinary, considering this group accounts for just 0.62% of the population. By and large, nursing homes are ill-equipped to care for COVID-19 infected patients.12 While they're set up to care for elderly patients — whether they are generally healthy or have chronic health problems — these facilities are rarely equipped to quarantine and care for people with highly infectious diseases.
It's logical to assume that comingling infected patients with noninfected ones in a nursing home would result in exaggerated death rates, as the elderly are far more prone to die from any infection, including the common cold. We also learned, early on, that the elderly were disproportionately vulnerable to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Yet ordering infected patients into nursing homes with the most vulnerable population of all is exactly what several Democrat governors decided to do, including New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo,13 Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom.
ProPublica published an investigation14 June 16, 2020, comparing a New York nursing home that followed Cuomo's misguided order with one that refused, opting to follow the federal guidelines instead. The difference was stark.
By June 18, the Diamond Hill nursing home — which followed Cuomo's directive — had lost 18 residents to COVID-19, thanks to lack of isolation and inadequate infection control. Half the staff (about 50 people) and 58 patients were infected and fell ill.
In comparison, Van Rensselaer Manor, a 320-bed nursing home located in the same county as Diamond Hill, which refused to follow the state's directive and did not admit any patient suspected of having COVID-19, did not have a single COVID-19 death. A similar trend has been observed in other areas.
If it weren't for systematic medical mistreatment at certain hospitals and incomprehensible decision-making by a handful of state governors, the COVID-19 death toll may well have been negligible.
Other Considerations When Evaluating COVID-19 Death Toll
We should also remember that a) the vast majority of people died with SARS-CoV-2 infection, not from it, and b) medical treatments showing significant promise have been savagely censored and even barred from use based on falsified and seriously flawed studies.
According to groundbreaking data15 released by the CDC on August 26, 2020, only 6% of the total COVID-19-related deaths in the U.S. had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate.
Six percent of 201,141 (the total death toll reported by the CDC as of October 14, 2020) is 12,068. In other words, SARS-CoV-2 infection was directly responsible for just over 12,000 deaths of otherwise healthy individuals. The remaining 94% had an average of 2.6 health conditions that contributed to their deaths.
When you add all of these factors together — the wanton mismanagement of the infection in hotspots such as New York, the decision to send infected patients into nursing homes, the fact that few healthy people died from the infection and that potential medical treatments have been and still are actively suppressed — it kind of starts to look like a manufactured crisis.
Infection Fatality on Par With the Flu
While Frieden is now stoking fears by claiming COVID-19 is the third leading cause of death, and Scientific American is calling the claim that its fatality is on par with the flu “fake news,”16 I would call your attention to research looking at the fatality ratio for the average person, excluding those residing in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.
The overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality ratio [for COVID-19] was 0.26% … persons younger than 40 years had an infection fatality ratio of 0.01%; those aged 60 or older had an infection fatality ratio of 1.71%. ~ Annals of Internal Medicine September 2, 2020
The September 2, 2020, article17 in Annals of Internal Medicine points out that, because many who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 remain asymptomatic it's very difficult to estimate the true infection rate, and when calculating mortality rates based on confirmed “cases” (meaning positive tests) you end up overestimating the infection fatality ratio. As explained by the authors:18
“To calculate a true infection fatality ratio, population prevalence data are needed from large geographic areas where reliable death data also exist … We combined prevalence estimates from a statewide random sample with Indiana vital statistics data of confirmed COVID-19 deaths.
In brief, our stratified random sample consisted of state residents aged 12 years and older. Known decedents and incarcerated persons were excluded. Because nursing homes were limiting residents' ability to leave and re-enter the facilities, their participation was unlikely.
Participants were tested from 25 April to 29 April 2020 for active viral infection and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which would indicate prior infection … We calculated the IFR by age, race, sex, and ethnicity on the basis of the cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 deaths as of 29 April 2020, divided by the number of infections.
Although nursing home residents were not tested, they represented 54.9% of Indiana's deaths. Thus, we excluded nursing home residents from all calculations (that is, deaths and infections).
To account for all infections, we added the number of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the testing period and noninstitutionalized COVID-19 deaths into the denominator …
Our random-sample study estimated 187,802 cumulative infections, to which 180 hospitalizations were added. The average age among all COVID-19 decedents was 76.9 years.
The overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality ratio was 0.26% … Persons younger than 40 years had an infection fatality ratio of 0.01%; those aged 60 or older had an infection fatality ratio of 1.71%.”
The estimated infection fatality rate for seasonal influenza listed in this paper is 0.8%. Other sources put it a little higher. In either case, according to this paper, the only people for whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is more dangerous than influenza are those over the age of 60.
All others have a lower risk of dying from COVID-19 than they have of dying from the flu. Put another way, if you're under the age of 60, your chance of dying from the flu is greater than your chance of dying from COVID-19.
White House coronavirus task force coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx also confirmed this far lower than typically reported mortality rate when she, in mid-August 2020, stated that it “becomes more and more difficult” to get people to comply with mask rules “when people start to realize that 99% of us are going to be fine.”19
In addition to COVID-19 having a lethality on par with the flu (again for the average person under the age of 60):
Data 20 , 21 shows the overall all-cause mortality has remained steady during 2020 and doesn't veer from the norm. In other words, COVID-19 has not killed off more of the population than would have died in any given year anyway
shows the overall all-cause mortality has remained steady during 2020 and doesn't veer from the norm. In other words, COVID-19 has not killed off more of the population than would have died in any given year anyway Several studies 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 also suggest immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection is far more widespread than anyone imagined
also suggest immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection is far more widespread than anyone imagined The threshold for herd immunity appears to be far lower than previously estimated 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34
As reported by British Sky News,35 October 7, 2020, respected scientists are now calling for a herd immunity approach to the pandemic, meaning governments should allow people who are not at a significant risk of serious COVID-19 illness to go back to normal life. As of October 18, 2020, The Great Barrington Declaration36 had been signed by 10,601 medical and public health scientists and 29,296 medical practitioners.37
Effective Treatment Protocols
At this stage in the game, there's plenty of cause for optimism. In addition to data showing, COVID-19 is nowhere near as lethal as initially suspected, we now have a number of safe and effective treatments. Two that I would place toward the top of the list are:
•Nebulized hydrogen peroxide (see video above) — This is a home remedy I recommend everyone familiarize themselves with, as in many cases it can improve symptoms within mere hours. It's even been shown to be effective in the later stages of the illness. Dr. David Brownstein, who has successfully treated over 100 COVID-19 patients with nebulized hydrogen peroxide, published a case paper38 about this treatment in the July 2020 issue of Science, Public Health Policy, and The Law. He also discusses its benefits in a recent interview I did with him. I review some of the basic science of how hydrogen peroxide works, as well as some of the studies assessing its therapeutic potential, in my April 2020 article “Could Hydrogen Peroxide Treat Coronavirus?” •The MATH+ Protocol, developed by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group39 (FLCCC) — There are now MATH+ protocols40 for prophylaxis, mild symptoms that can be treated at home, and a full clinical in-hospital critical care protocol. The group has issued several updates since April 2020, so be sure to download the latest versions from the Eastern Virginia Medical School COVID Care for Clinicians site.41
Lastly, there's overwhelming evidence showing that those with adequate vitamin D levels are far less likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2, less likely to develop symptoms if infected, and less likely to suffer complications, serious illness, or death.
Overall, optimizing your vitamin D level appears to be a foundational strategy to minimize your risk. To learn more, download my vitamin D report from StopCOVIDCold.com. There, you can also find a quick COVID-19 risk quiz to help you assess your general risk.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-01--Tech Giants Google, Oracle to Monitor Americans Who Get COVID-19 Vaccine

Last week , a rare media interview was given by the Trump administration ’ s “ Vaccine Czar ” offered a brief glimpse into the inner workings of the extremely secretive Operation Warp Speed ( OWS ) , the Trump administration ’ s “ public-private partnership ” for delivering a COVID-19 vaccine to 300 million Americans by next January .
What was revealed should deeply unsettle all Americans .
During an interview with the Wall Street Journal published last Friday , the “ captain ” of OWS , career Big Pharma executive Moncef Slaoui , confirmed that the millions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project ’ s COVID-19 vaccine will be monitored via “ incredibly precise … tracking systems ” that will “ ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects.
” Slaoui also noted that tech giants Google and Oracle have been contracted as part of this “ tracking system ” but did not specify their exact roles beyond helping to “ collect and track vaccine data.
” The day before the Wall Street Journal interview was published , the New York Times published a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to this “ tracking system ” as a “ very active pharmacovigilance surveillance system.
” During a previous interview with the journal Science in early September , Slaoui had referred to this system only as “ a very active pharmacovigilance system ” that would “ make sure that when the vaccines are introduced that we ’ ll absolutely continue to assess their safety.
” Slaoui has only recently tacked on the words “ tracking ” and “ surveillance ” to his description of this system during his relatively rare media interviews .
While @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system , ” the few official documents from OWS that have been publicly released offer some details about what this system may look like and how long it is expected to “ track ” the vital signs and whereabouts of Americans who receive a Warp Speed vaccine .
Two official OWS documents released in mid-September state that vaccine recipients — expected to include a majority of the U.S. population — would be monitored for twenty-four months after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine is administered and that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system.
” In the OWS document entitled “ From the Factory to the Frontlines , ” the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) and the Department of Defense ( DOD ) stated that , because Warp Speed vaccine candidates use new unlicensed vaccine production methods that “ have limited previous data on safety in humans … the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance and Phase 4 ( post-licensure ) clinical trials.
” The key objective of pharmacovigilance is to determine each vaccine ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efficacy , and to discover any infrequent and rare side effects not identified in clinical trials .
OWS will also use pharmacovigilance analytics , which serves as one of the instruments for the continuous monitoring of pharmacovigilance data .
Robust analytical tools will be used to leverage large amounts of data and the benefits of using such data across the value chain , including regulatory obligations .
In addition , Moncef Slaoui and OWS ’ s vaccine coordinator , Matt Hepburn , formerly a program manager at the Pentagon ’ s controversial Defense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine that stated that “ because some technologies have limited previous data on safety in humans , the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance strategies.
” The use of pharmacovigilance on those who receive the vaccine is also mentioned in the official Warp Speed “ infographic , ” which states that monitoring will be done in cooperation with the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and the Centers for Disease Control and Protection ( CDC ) and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adverse effects.
” In a separate part of that same document , OWS describes one of its “ four key tenets ” as “ traceability , ” which has three goals : to “ confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location ( private/public ) ” ; to send a “ reminder to return for the second dose ” ; and to “ administer the correct second dose.
” Regarding a COVID-19 vaccine requiring more than one dose , a CDC document associated with OWS states : For most COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , separated by 21 or 28 days , will be needed .
Because different COVID-19 vaccine products will not be interchangeable , a vaccine recipient ’ s second dose must be from the same manufacturer as their first dose .
Second-dose reminders for vaccine recipients will be critical to ensure compliance with vaccine dosing intervals and achieve optimal vaccine effectiveness .
The CDC document also references a document published in August by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security , associated with the Event 201 and Dark Winter simulations , as informing its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paper , which counts Dark Winter co-organizer Thomas Inglesby as one of its authors , argues that existing “ passive reporting ” systems managed by the CDC and FDA should be retooled to create “ an active safety surveillance system directed by the CDC that monitors all [ COVID-19 ] vaccine recipients — perhaps by short message service or other electronic mechanisms.
” Despite the claims in these documents that the “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system ” would intimately involve the FDA , top FDA officials stated in September that they were barred from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could not explain the operation ’ s organization or when or with what frequency its leadership meets .
The FDA officials did state , however , that they “ are still allowed to interact with companies developing products for OWS , ” STAT reported .
In addition , the FDA has apparently “ set up a firewall between the vast majority of staff and the initiative [ Operation Warp Speed ] ” that appears to drastically limit the number of FDA officials with any knowledge of or involvement in Warp Speed .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Drug Evaluation and Research , Janet Woodcock , is the only FDA official listed as having any direct involvement in OWS and appears to be personally managing this “ firewall ” at the FDA .
Woodcock describes herself as a long-time advocate for the use of “ big data ” in the evaluation of drug and vaccine safety and has been intimately involved in FDA precursors to the coming Warp Speed “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system ” known as Sentinel and PRISM , both of which are discussed later in this report .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of absence from her role as the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , which allows her to focus her complete attention on overseeing aspects of OWS on behalf of the FDA ’ s Office of the Commissioner .
Her temporary replacement at the FDA , Patrizia Cavazzoni , is “ very aligned with Janet and where the agency is going , ” according to media reports .
Cavazzoni is a former executive at Pfizer , one of the companies producing a vaccine for OWS .
That vaccine is set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as 12 years old .
The extreme secrecy of OWS has affected not only the FDA but also the CDC , as a CDC expert panel normally involved in developing the government ’ s vaccine distribution strategies was “ stonewalled ” by Matt Hepburn , OWS ’ s vaccine coordinator , who bluntly refused to answer several of the panel ’ s “ pointed questions ” about the highly secretive operation .
While Moncef Slaoui and Warp Speed documents provide few details regarding what this “ tracking system ” would entail , Slaoui @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Wall Street Journal that tech giants Google and Oracle had been contracted to “ collect and track vaccine data ” as part of this system .
Neither Google nor Oracle , however , has announced receipt of a contract related to OWS , and the DOD and HHS , similarly , have yet to announce the awarding of any Warp Speed contract to either Google or Oracle .
In addition , searches on the U.S. government ’ s Federal Register and on the official website for federally awarded contracts came up empty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oracle that would apply to any such “ pharmacovigilance ” system or any other aspect of Operation Warp Speed .
Given my previous reporting on the use of a nongovernment intermediary for awarding OWS contracts to vaccine companies , it seems likely that Warp Speed contracts awarded to Google and Oracle were made using a similar mechanism .
In an Oct. 6 report for The Last American Vagabond , I noted that $ 6 billion in Warp Speed contracts awarded to vaccine companies were made through Advanced Technology International ( ATI ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the military and surveillance technology companies and whose parent company has strong ties to the CIA and the 2001 Dark Winter simulation .
HHS , which is supposedly overseeing OWS , claimed to have “ no record ” of at least one of those contracts .
Only one Warp Speed vaccine contract , which did not involve ATI and was awarded directly by HHS ’ s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority , was recently obtained by KEI Online .
Major parts of the contract , however , including the section on intellectual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entirety .
If the Warp Speed contracts that have been awarded to Google and Oracle are anything like the Warp Speed contracts awarded to most of its participating vaccine companies , then those contracts grant those companies diminished federal oversight and exemptions from federal laws and regulations designed to protect taxpayer interests in the pursuit of the work stipulated in the contract .
It also makes them essentially immune to Freedom of Information Act requests .
Yet , in contrast to the unacknowledged Google and Oracle contracts , vaccine companies have publicly disclosed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not the terms or details of those contracts .
This suggests that Google and Oracle contracts are even more secretive .
A major conflict of interest worth noting is Google ’ s ownership of YouTube , which recently banned on its massive multimedia platform all “ misinformation ” related to concerns about a future COVID-19 vaccine .
With Google now formally part of OWS , it seems likely that any concerns about OWS ’ s extreme secrecy and the conflicts of interest of many of its members ( particularly Moncef Slaoui and Matt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerns about Warp Speed vaccine safety , allocation and/or distribution , may be labeled “ COVID-19 vaccine misinformation ” and removed from YouTube .
From the NSA to the FDA : the new PRISM Though the nature of this coming surveillance system for COVID-19 vaccine recipients has yet to be fully detailed by Warp Speed or the tech companies the operation has contracted , OWS documents and existing infrastructure at the FDA offer a clue as to what this system could entail .
For instance , the Warp Speed document “ From the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pharmacovigilance system will be a new system created exclusively for OWS that will be “ buil [ t ] off of existing IT [ information technology ] infrastructure ” and will fill any “ gaps with new IT solutions.
” It then notes that “ the COVID-19 vaccination program requires significant enhancement of the IT that will support enhancements and data exchange that are critical for a multi-dose candidate to ensure proper administration of a potential second dose.
” The document also states that all data related to the OWS vaccine distribution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common IT infrastructure that will support analysis and reporting , ” adding that this “ IT infrastructure will support partners with a broad range of tools for record-keeping , data on who is being vaccinated , and reminders for second doses.
” Though some Warp Speed documents hint as to the existing IT systems that will serve as the foundation for this new tracking system , arguably the most likely candidate is the FDA-managed Sentinel Initiative , which was established in 2009 during the H1N1 Swine flu pandemic .
Like OWS itself , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FDA , private business , and academia .
According to its website , Sentinel ’ s “ main goal is to improve how FDA evaluates the safety and performance of medical products ” through big data , with an additional focus on “ learning more about potential side effects.
” Media reports describe Sentinel as “ an electronic surveillance system that aggregates data from electronic medical records , claims , and registries that voluntarily participate and allows the agency to track the safety of marketed drugs , biologics , and medical devices.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ proponents at the FDA is Janet Woodcock , who has aggressively worked to expand the program as director of the FDA ’ s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , with a focus on Sentinel ’ s use in “ post-market effectiveness studies.
” As previously mentioned , Woodcock is the only FDA official listed among the ninety or so “ leaders ” of OWS , most of whom are part of the U.S. military and lack any health-care or vaccine-production experience .
Woodcock ’ s temporary replacement at the FDA , Patrizia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ efforts to expand Sentinel .
STAT reported earlier this year that Cavazzoni previously “ served on the sterling committee of I-MEDS , an FDA-industry partnership which allows drug makers to pay for use of the FDA ’ s real-world data system known as Sentinel to complete certain safety studies more quickly.
” Sentinel has a series of “ collaborating partners ” that “ provide healthcare data and scientific , technical , and organizational expertise ” to the initiative .
These collaborating partners include intelligence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton , tech giant IBM , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Aetna and Blue Cross Blue Shield , among many others .
In addition , Sentinel ’ s Innovation Center , which it describes as the program ’ s “ testbed to identify , develop , and evaluate innovative methods , ” is partnered with Amazon , General Dynamics , and Microsoft .
Sentinel also has a Community Building and Outreach Center , which is managed by Deloitte consulting , one of the largest consultancy firms in the world that are known for seeking to fill its ranks with former CIA officials .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ program aimed at monitoring vaccine effectiveness is known as the Post-licensure Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring Program , better known as PRISM .
Sentinel ’ s PRISM was “ developed to monitor vaccine safety , but [ to date ] has never been used to assess vaccine effectiveness.
” PRISM was initially launched alongside the Sentinel Initiative itself is 2009 “ in response to the need to monitor the safety of the H1N1 influenza vaccine ” after it was licensed , marketed , and administered .
Yet , as previously mentioned , PRISM has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effectiveness of any vaccine while quietly expanding for nearly a decade , which implies that the stakeholders in the Sentinel Initiative have a plan to implement this “ safety surveillance system ” at some point .
The name PRISM may remind readers of the National Security Agency ( NSA ) program of the same name that became well known throughout the United States following the Edward Snowden revelations .
Given this association , it is worth noting that the NSA , as well as the Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Speed and appear to be playing a role in the development of Warp Speed ’ s “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system.
” The addition of the NSA and the DHS to the initiative , of course , greatly increases the involvement of U.S. intelligence agencies in the operation , which itself is “ dominated ” by the military and sorely lacking in civilian public health officials .
CyberScoop first reported in early September that members of the NSA ’ s Cybersecurity Directorate were involved in OWS , with their role — as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as offering “ cybersecurity advice ” to the initiative .
However , the NSA and DHS are also offering “ guidance ” and “ services ” to both the other federal agencies involved in Warp Speed as well as OWS contractors , which now include Google and Oracle .
Google is well known for its cozy relationship with the NSA , including its PRISM program , and they have also backed NSA-supported legislation that would make it easier to surveil Americans without a warrant .
Similarly , Oracle is a longtime NSA contractor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dating back to its earliest days as a company , not unlike Google .
Notably , Oracle and Google remain locked in a major legal battle over copyright issues that are set to be heard by the Supreme Court in the coming weeks and is expected to have major ramifications for the tech industry .
In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks , the U.S. military attempted to institute a surveillance program so invasive that Congress defunded it just months after its creation due to public outrage .
Known as Total Information Awareness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to develop an all-seeing surveillance apparatus managed by the Pentagon ’ s DARPA and officially argued that invasive surveillance of the entire U.S. population was necessary to prevent terrorist attacks , bioterrorism events , and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks before they could take place .
Before it was disbanded , TIA sought to collect Americans ’ medical records ; fingerprints ; gait , facial , and iris biometric data ; drug prescriptions ; and even DNA in addition to citizens ’ financial , travel , and media-consumption habits .
TIA , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partnership ” managed by the DOD and partnered with the NSA , the CIA , and other intelligence agencies as well as the private sector and academia .
Also like Warp Speed , TIA officially justified its invasive surveillance goals by claiming that its initiatives would rescue Americans from the “ invisible enemy ” of faceless terrorists abroad and ensure citizens ’ safety , security , and health .
Today , Warp Speed officially takes aim at a new type of “ invisible enemy ” — a microbe invisible to the naked human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the public pushback against TIA was fierce .
The American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) claimed at the time that the surveillance effort would “ kill privacy in America ” because “ every aspect of our lives would be cataloged , ” while mainstream media outlets warned that TIA was “ fighting terror by terrifying U.S. citizens.
” Despite Congress officially defunding the program , it later emerged that TIA was never actually shut down , with its various programs having been covertly divided among the web of military and intelligence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state .
Unlike in years past , TIA ’ s apparent successor , OWS , has received no pushback from mainstream media outlets or advocacy organizations , with many of these same entities now placing blind faith in the secretive initiative and lionizing it as the “ only way ” to resolve the COVID-19 pandemic crisis .
The national security state has carefully learned from and studied its past failures , while many Americans , in contrast , continue to place their trust in the very agencies and government entities that have lied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and maimed countless civilians abroad , produced a series of failed states in order to plunder their resources , and are currently facilitating the pillaging of the American economy by Wall Street and the Federal Reserve under the guise of “ relief.
” Allowing these same entities to surveil and track a majority of Americans and to use the country ’ s population as guinea pigs for unlicensed , understudied , and experimental vaccine technologies is a clear recipe for disaster .
At the same time , it would also enable a surveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stand to lose not only their few remaining civil liberties but even sovereignty over their own bodies .
The total-surveillance agenda that began with TIA and that has been resurrected through Warp Speed predated COVID-19 by decades .
Its architects and proponents have worked to justify these extreme and invasive surveillance programs by marketing this agenda as the “ solution ” to whatever Americans are most afraid of at any given time .
It has very little to do with “ public health ” and everything to do with total control .
Published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

By Whitney Webb | Children's Health Defense
Last week, a rare media interview was given by the Trump administration’s “Vaccine Czar” offered a brief glimpse into the inner workings of the extremely secretive Operation Warp Speed (OWS), the Trump administration’s “public-private partnership” for delivering a COVID-19 vaccine to 300 million Americans by next January. What was revealed should deeply unsettle all Americans.
During an interview with the Wall Street Journal published last Friday, the “captain” of OWS, career Big Pharma executive Moncef Slaoui, confirmed that the millions of Americans who are set to receive the project’s COVID-19 vaccine will be monitored via “incredibly precise … tracking systems” that will “ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects.” Slaoui also noted that tech giants Google and Oracle have been contracted as part of this “tracking system” but did not specify their exact roles beyond helping to “collect and track vaccine data.”
The day before the Wall Street Journal interview was published, the New York Times published a separate interview with Slaoui where he referred to this “tracking system” as a “very active pharmacovigilance surveillance system.” During a previous interview with the journal Science in early September, Slaoui had referred to this system only as “a very active pharmacovigilance system” that would “make sure that when the vaccines are introduced that we’ll absolutely continue to assess their safety.” Slaoui has only recently tacked on the words “tracking” and “surveillance” to his description of this system during his relatively rare media interviews.
While Slaoui himself was short on specifics regarding this “pharmacovigilance surveillance system,” the few official documents from OWS that have been publicly released offer some details about what this system may look like and how long it is expected to “track” the vital signs and whereabouts of Americans who receive a Warp Speed vaccine.
The pharmacovigilantes
Two official OWS documents released in mid-September state that vaccine recipients — expected to include a majority of the U.S. population — would be monitored for twenty-four months after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine is administered and that this would be done by a “pharmacovigilance system.”
In the OWS document entitled “From the Factory to the Frontlines,” the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Defense (DOD) stated that, because Warp Speed vaccine candidates use new unlicensed vaccine production methods that “have limited previous data on safety in humans … the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance and Phase 4 (post-licensure) clinical trials.”
It continues:
The key objective of pharmacovigilance is to determine each vaccine’s performance in real-life scenarios, to study efficacy, and to discover any infrequent and rare side effects not identified in clinical trials. OWS will also use pharmacovigilance analytics, which serves as one of the instruments for the continuous monitoring of pharmacovigilance data. Robust analytical tools will be used to leverage large amounts of data and the benefits of using such data across the value chain, including regulatory obligations.
In addition, Moncef Slaoui and OWS’s vaccine coordinator, Matt Hepburn, formerly a program manager at the Pentagon’s controversial Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, had previously published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine that stated that “because some technologies have limited previous data on safety in humans, the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance strategies.”
The use of pharmacovigilance on those who receive the vaccine is also mentioned in the official Warp Speed “infographic,” which states that monitoring will be done in cooperation with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC) and will involve “24-month post-trial monitoring for adverse effects.”
In a separate part of that same document, OWS describes one of its “four key tenets” as “traceability,” which has three goals: to “confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location (private/public)”; to send a “reminder to return for the second dose”; and to “administer the correct second dose.”
Regarding a COVID-19 vaccine requiring more than one dose, a CDC document associated with OWS states:
For most COVID-19 vaccine products, two doses of vaccine, separated by 21 or 28 days, will be needed. Because different COVID-19 vaccine products will not be interchangeable, a vaccine recipient’s second dose must be from the same manufacturer as their first dose. Second-dose reminders for vaccine recipients will be critical to ensure compliance with vaccine dosing intervals and achieve optimal vaccine effectiveness.
The CDC document also references a document published in August by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, associated with the Event 201 and Dark Winter simulations, as informing its COVID-19 vaccination strategy. The Johns Hopkins paper, which counts Dark Winter co-organizer Thomas Inglesby as one of its authors, argues that existing “passive reporting” systems managed by the CDC and FDA should be retooled to create “an active safety surveillance system directed by the CDC that monitors all [COVID-19] vaccine recipients — perhaps by short message service or other electronic mechanisms.”
Despite the claims in these documents that the “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” would intimately involve the FDA, top FDA officials stated in September that they were barred from attending OWS meetings and told reporters they could not explain the operation’s organization or when or with what frequency its leadership meets. The FDA officials did state, however, that they “are still allowed to interact with companies developing products for OWS,” STAT reported.
In addition, the FDA has apparently “set up a firewall between the vast majority of staff and the initiative [Operation Warp Speed]” that appears to drastically limit the number of FDA officials with any knowledge of or involvement in Warp Speed. The FDA’s director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Janet Woodcock, is the only FDA official listed as having any direct involvement in OWS and appears to be personally managing this “firewall” at the FDA. Woodcock describes herself as a long-time advocate for the use of “big data” in the evaluation of drug and vaccine safety and has been intimately involved in FDA precursors to the coming Warp Speed “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” known as Sentinel and PRISM, both of which are discussed later in this report.
Woodcock is currently on a temporary leave of absence from her role as the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, which allows her to focus her complete attention on overseeing aspects of OWS on behalf of the FDA’s Office of the Commissioner. Her temporary replacement at the FDA, Patrizia Cavazzoni, is “very aligned with Janet and where the agency is going,” according to media reports. Cavazzoni is a former executive at Pfizer, one of the companies producing a vaccine for OWS. That vaccine is set to begin testing in children as young as 12 years old.
The extreme secrecy of OWS has affected not only the FDA but also the CDC, as a CDC expert panel normally involved in developing the government’s vaccine distribution strategies was “stonewalled” by Matt Hepburn, OWS’s vaccine coordinator, who bluntly refused to answer several of the panel’s “pointed questions” about the highly secretive operation.
More secret contracts
While Moncef Slaoui and Warp Speed documents provide few details regarding what this “tracking system” would entail, Slaoui did note in his recent interview with the Wall Street Journal that tech giants Google and Oracle had been contracted to “collect and track vaccine data” as part of this system. Neither Google nor Oracle, however, has announced receipt of a contract related to OWS, and the DOD and HHS, similarly, have yet to announce the awarding of any Warp Speed contract to either Google or Oracle. In addition, searches on the U.S. government’s Federal Register and on the official website for federally awarded contracts came up empty for any contract awarded to Google or Oracle that would apply to any such “pharmacovigilance” system or any other aspect of Operation Warp Speed.
Given my previous reporting on the use of a nongovernment intermediary for awarding OWS contracts to vaccine companies, it seems likely that Warp Speed contracts awarded to Google and Oracle were made using a similar mechanism. In an Oct. 6 report for The Last American Vagabond, I noted that $6 billion in Warp Speed contracts awarded to vaccine companies were made through Advanced Technology International (ATI), a government contractor that works mainly with the military and surveillance technology companies and whose parent company has strong ties to the CIA and the 2001 Dark Winter simulation. HHS, which is supposedly overseeing OWS, claimed to have “no record” of at least one of those contracts. Only one Warp Speed vaccine contract, which did not involve ATI and was awarded directly by HHS’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, was recently obtained by KEI Online. Major parts of the contract, however, including the section on intellectual property rights, were redacted in their entirety.
If the Warp Speed contracts that have been awarded to Google and Oracle are anything like the Warp Speed contracts awarded to most of its participating vaccine companies, then those contracts grant those companies diminished federal oversight and exemptions from federal laws and regulations designed to protect taxpayer interests in the pursuit of the work stipulated in the contract. It also makes them essentially immune to Freedom of Information Act requests. Yet, in contrast to the unacknowledged Google and Oracle contracts, vaccine companies have publicly disclosed that they received OWS contracts, just not the terms or details of those contracts. This suggests that Google and Oracle contracts are even more secretive.
A major conflict of interest worth noting is Google’s ownership of YouTube, which recently banned on its massive multimedia platform all “misinformation” related to concerns about a future COVID-19 vaccine. With Google now formally part of OWS, it seems likely that any concerns about OWS’s extreme secrecy and the conflicts of interest of many of its members (particularly Moncef Slaoui and Matt Hepburn), as well as any concerns about Warp Speed vaccine safety, allocation and/or distribution, may be labeled “COVID-19 vaccine misinformation” and removed from YouTube.
From the NSA to the FDA: the new PRISM
Though the nature of this coming surveillance system for COVID-19 vaccine recipients has yet to be fully detailed by Warp Speed or the tech companies the operation has contracted, OWS documents and existing infrastructure at the FDA offer a clue as to what this system could entail.
For instance, the Warp Speed document “From the Factory to the Frontlines” notes that the pharmacovigilance system will be a new system created exclusively for OWS that will be “buil[t] off of existing IT [information technology] infrastructure” and will fill any “gaps with new IT solutions.” It then notes that “the COVID-19 vaccination program requires significant enhancement of the IT that will support enhancements and data exchange that are critical for a multi-dose candidate to ensure proper administration of a potential second dose.” The document also states that all data related to the OWS vaccine distribution effort “will be reported into a common IT infrastructure that will support analysis and reporting,” adding that this “IT infrastructure will support partners with a broad range of tools for record-keeping, data on who is being vaccinated, and reminders for second doses.”
Though some Warp Speed documents hint as to the existing IT systems that will serve as the foundation for this new tracking system, arguably the most likely candidate is the FDA-managed Sentinel Initiative, which was established in 2009 during the H1N1 Swine flu pandemic. Like OWS itself, Sentinel is a public-private partnership and involves the FDA, private business, and academia.
According to its website, Sentinel’s “main goal is to improve how FDA evaluates the safety and performance of medical products” through big data, with an additional focus on “learning more about potential side effects.” Media reports describe Sentinel as “an electronic surveillance system that aggregates data from electronic medical records, claims, and registries that voluntarily participate and allows the agency to track the safety of marketed drugs, biologics, and medical devices.”
One of Sentinel’s main proponents at the FDA is Janet Woodcock, who has aggressively worked to expand the program as director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, with a focus on Sentinel’s use in “post-market effectiveness studies.” As previously mentioned, Woodcock is the only FDA official listed among the ninety or so “leaders” of OWS, most of whom are part of the U.S. military and lack any health-care or vaccine-production experience.
Woodcock’s temporary replacement at the FDA, Patrizia Cavazzoni, is also very active in efforts to expand Sentinel. STAT reported earlier this year that Cavazzoni previously “served on the sterling committee of I-MEDS, an FDA-industry partnership which allows drug makers to pay for use of the FDA’s real-world data system known as Sentinel to complete certain safety studies more quickly.”
Sentinel has a series of “collaborating partners” that “provide healthcare data and scientific, technical, and organizational expertise” to the initiative. These collaborating partners include intelligence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, tech giant IBM, and major U.S. health insurance companies such as Aetna and Blue Cross Blue Shield, among many others. In addition, Sentinel’s Innovation Center, which it describes as the program’s “testbed to identify, develop, and evaluate innovative methods,” is partnered with Amazon, General Dynamics, and Microsoft. Sentinel also has a Community Building and Outreach Center, which is managed by Deloitte consulting, one of the largest consultancy firms in the world that are known for seeking to fill its ranks with former CIA officials.
The Sentinel system’s specific surveillance program aimed at monitoring vaccine effectiveness is known as the Post-licensure Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring Program, better known as PRISM. Sentinel’s PRISM was “developed to monitor vaccine safety, but [to date] has never been used to assess vaccine effectiveness.” PRISM was initially launched alongside the Sentinel Initiative itself is 2009 “in response to the need to monitor the safety of the H1N1 influenza vaccine” after it was licensed, marketed, and administered. Yet, as previously mentioned, PRISM has yet to be used to assess the effectiveness of any vaccine while quietly expanding for nearly a decade, which implies that the stakeholders in the Sentinel Initiative have a plan to implement this “safety surveillance system” at some point.
The name PRISM may remind readers of the National Security Agency (NSA) program of the same name that became well known throughout the United States following the Edward Snowden revelations. Given this association, it is worth noting that the NSA, as well as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), are now officially part of Operation Warp Speed and appear to be playing a role in the development of Warp Speed’s “pharmacovigilance surveillance system.” The addition of the NSA and the DHS to the initiative, of course, greatly increases the involvement of U.S. intelligence agencies in the operation, which itself is “dominated” by the military and sorely lacking in civilian public health officials.
CyberScoop first reported in early September that members of the NSA’s Cybersecurity Directorate were involved in OWS, with their role — as well as that of DHS — being framed mainly as offering “cybersecurity advice” to the initiative. However, the NSA and DHS are also offering “guidance” and “services” to both the other federal agencies involved in Warp Speed as well as OWS contractors, which now include Google and Oracle.
Google is well known for its cozy relationship with the NSA, including its PRISM program, and they have also backed NSA-supported legislation that would make it easier to surveil Americans without a warrant. Similarly, Oracle is a longtime NSA contractor and also has ties to the CIA dating back to its earliest days as a company, not unlike Google. Notably, Oracle and Google remain locked in a major legal battle over copyright issues that are set to be heard by the Supreme Court in the coming weeks and is expected to have major ramifications for the tech industry.
The public health panopticon
In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. military attempted to institute a surveillance program so invasive that Congress defunded it just months after its creation due to public outrage. Known as Total Information Awareness (TIA), the program sought to develop an all-seeing surveillance apparatus managed by the Pentagon’s DARPA and officially argued that invasive surveillance of the entire U.S. population was necessary to prevent terrorist attacks, bioterrorism events, and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks before they could take place.
Before it was disbanded, TIA sought to collect Americans’ medical records; fingerprints; gait, facial, and iris biometric data; drug prescriptions; and even DNA in addition to citizens’ financial, travel, and media-consumption habits. TIA, not unlike OWS, was a “public-private partnership” managed by the DOD and partnered with the NSA, the CIA, and other intelligence agencies as well as the private sector and academia.
Also like Warp Speed, TIA officially justified its invasive surveillance goals by claiming that its initiatives would rescue Americans from the “invisible enemy” of faceless terrorists abroad and ensure citizens’ safety, security, and health. Today, Warp Speed officially takes aim at a new type of “invisible enemy” — a microbe invisible to the naked human eye.
In the years after 9/11, the public pushback against TIA was fierce. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) claimed at the time that the surveillance effort would “kill privacy in America” because “every aspect of our lives would be cataloged,” while mainstream media outlets warned that TIA was “fighting terror by terrifying U.S. citizens.” Despite Congress officially defunding the program, it later emerged that TIA was never actually shut down, with its various programs having been covertly divided among the web of military and intelligence agencies that comprise the U.S. national security state.
Unlike in years past, TIA’s apparent successor, OWS, has received no pushback from mainstream media outlets or advocacy organizations, with many of these same entities now placing blind faith in the secretive initiative and lionizing it as the “only way” to resolve the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.
The national security state has carefully learned from and studied its past failures, while many Americans, in contrast, continue to place their trust in the very agencies and government entities that have lied the country into multiple wars, tortured and maimed countless civilians abroad, produced a series of failed states in order to plunder their resources, and are currently facilitating the pillaging of the American economy by Wall Street and the Federal Reserve under the guise of “relief.”
Allowing these same entities to surveil and track a majority of Americans and to use the country’s population as guinea pigs for unlicensed, understudied, and experimental vaccine technologies is a clear recipe for disaster. At the same time, it would also enable a surveillance panopticon so dystopian and far-reaching that Americans stand to lose not only their few remaining civil liberties but even sovereignty over their own bodies.
The total-surveillance agenda that began with TIA and that has been resurrected through Warp Speed predated COVID-19 by decades. Its architects and proponents have worked to justify these extreme and invasive surveillance programs by marketing this agenda as the “solution” to whatever Americans are most afraid of at any given time. It has very little to do with “public health” and everything to do with total control.
Published with permission by The Last American Vagabond.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-01--Tech That Can Help to Keep Your Family Safe

When you have a family , you want to keep them as safe as possible at all times .
This is completely understandable .
In fact , there ’ s so much demand for safety that an entire industry has developed around products and services that can help you to protect your loved ones .
Here are just a few different pieces of tech that can help to keep everyone as safe and sound as possible !
Seeing your kids head out into the world on their own and without you can be a big step in any parent ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to having your kid with you all the time , or resting assured that they are in school , with a childminder or in another setting with adult supervision .
But at some point , your child is going to reach their teen years and will want to spend time away from the house , with their friends and without you .
A good way to ease worries and ensure that you know they ’ re safe and sound at all times is to provide them with a phone that can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can keep in touch , they can reach out if they need help and you can familiarise yourself with if you are worried about their whereabouts .
Your home should be your safe haven and your family should feel safe and protected while they are inside it .
A great piece of tech that can promote safety and provide comfort is .
CCTV stands for “ closed circuit television ” and is a form of surveillance camera system that has become commonly used by many different people .
Chances are you ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in stores and other establishments .
But you can also now get home CCTV systems which can be attached to the exterior of your property and protect your home in the same way that similar cameras protect public spaces and private businesses .
CCTV can be used to prevent people from attempting to break into your home .
It can be used to prevent people from defacing your property – smashing windows , graffiti-ing , damaging vehicles or causing other trouble .
When people are aware that they are being recorded , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crime .
If anyone does commit a crime around your home , you ’ ll have footage to help identify them and prosecute them .
are essentially alarm systems that will trigger if someone enters your property while the alarm is set .
The alarm will make a loud noise and cause trespassers to flee .
They can even be fitted with settings that contact the police and local authorities when they ’ re triggered .
These are just a few different pieces of tech that can really help you when it comes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safe .
Each is a great investment that will prove more than worth the money !

When you have a family, you want to keep them as safe as possible at all times. This is completely understandable. In fact, there’s so much demand for safety that an entire industry has developed around products and services that can help you to protect your loved ones. Here are just a few different pieces of tech that can help to keep everyone as safe and sound as possible!
Phone Tracking
Seeing your kids head out into the world on their own and without you can be a big step in any parent’s life. You’ll be used to having your kid with you all the time, or resting assured that they are in school, with a childminder or in another setting with adult supervision. But at some point, your child is going to reach their teen years and will want to spend time away from the house, with their friends and without you. A good way to ease worries and ensure that you know they’re safe and sound at all times is to provide them with a phone that can be tracked and monitored. This way you can keep in touch, they can reach out if they need help and you can familiarise yourself with locating an iPhone if you are worried about their whereabouts.
CCTV
Your home should be your safe haven and your family should feel safe and protected while they are inside it. A great piece of tech that can promote safety and provide comfort is CCTV . CCTV stands for “closed circuit television” and is a form of surveillance camera system that has become commonly used by many different people. Chances are you’ve seen CCTV cameras in public spaces and in stores and other establishments. But you can also now get home CCTV systems which can be attached to the exterior of your property and protect your home in the same way that similar cameras protect public spaces and private businesses. CCTV can be used to prevent people from attempting to break into your home. It can be used to prevent people from defacing your property – smashing windows, graffiti-ing, damaging vehicles or causing other trouble. When people are aware that they are being recorded, they are much less likely to commit a crime. If anyone does commit a crime around your home, you’ll have footage to help identify them and prosecute them.
Home Security Systems
Home security systems are essentially alarm systems that will trigger if someone enters your property while the alarm is set. The alarm will make a loud noise and cause trespassers to flee. They can even be fitted with settings that contact the police and local authorities when they’re triggered.
These are just a few different pieces of tech that can really help you when it comes to helping you to keep your family safe. Each is a great investment that will prove more than worth the money!


consciouslifenews--2020-11-01--Marketing Your Business During Election Fever

Election fever is finally in full swing and that comes with a volley of advertising strategies that could overwhelm the ordinary American citizen .
While the frontrunners in the race have massive budgets to run their campaigns , the marketing strategies they usually employ actually offer good lessons for both large and small businesses .
If candidates can employ these methods to win entire presidential elections , just imagine what these tactics can do for your business .
All candidates normally start by knocking on people ’ s doors to introduce themselves to the electorate .
As they scale up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , opinion pieces on leading publications , news spots , national debates , and caucuses .
Direct personal interactions with the community help to foster credibility for the candidates and the same case applies for businesses .
As a business owner , you should make an effort to participate in local events , trade shows , and other events that give you the opportunity to put a face to your business ’ s name .
Such events will also give you the opportunity to expand your network , generate leads , boost your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your store or website .
Position Yourself for the Massive Spending Even before 2020 was here , analysts had long predicted that expenditure on political advertisements would hit new record highs , surging by billions above the previous presidential election period .
With politicians and political parties splashing all these billions , there has to be something in it for your business .
If you ’ re running a small business like a restaurant in your local area , don ’ t be surprised when political campaigners approach you and request for space @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or if you ’ d be interested in displaying their campaign signage , like yard signs , in front of your business as for form of support .
They might even want to pay you to have their campaign material in your premises if you ’ re located in a high traffic zone .
Each presidential election period comes with a displacement of billions of dollars of advertisement spots by campaigners , political action committees , and politicians .
While certain social media platforms will place restrictions on political advertisements , radio TV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the Federal Communications Commission .
This can result in TV and radio stations filling their schedules with more political advertisement spots than the stations would otherwise prefer to broadcast .
With so much advertisement noise , and billions of dollars in ad spots being inaccessible to non-political marketers , the rivalry for the few available premium ad spots becomes as competitive and outrageous as Super Bowl commercials .
Find a Way Out of the Election Lethargy Before you totally give up , contemplate the fact that content marketing always offers a higher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain segments of marketers and tactics .
Besides that , there ’ s always more pressure to generate higher quality content in order to stand out from all the chaotic election noise .
Content targeted toward organic and inbound channels will definitely stand a better chance of bypassing the political hullabaloo and the costly paid channels .
The bright side of it is that people feeling the lethargy of the election cycle will undoubtedly be actively looking for everything from funny memes and other entertainment , to your engaging and brilliantly marketed content @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t realize that they also have the same means and tools to execute similar strategies to those employed by presidential candidates .
You can set aside resources from your business to participate in events , position yourself for the massive ad spending by political parties , choose the right marketing channels , and create awesome content to stay ahead of your competition .
If candidates can win elections using these tactics , then your business can surely use them to its advantage too .

By Dan Kihato
Election fever is finally in full swing and that comes with a volley of advertising strategies that could overwhelm the ordinary American citizen. While the frontrunners in the race have massive budgets to run their campaigns, the marketing strategies they usually employ actually offer good lessons for both large and small businesses. If candidates can employ these methods to win entire presidential elections, just imagine what these tactics can do for your business.
Get Involved in Events
All candidates normally start by knocking on people’s doors to introduce themselves to the electorate. As they scale up, they proceed to hosting town halls, opinion pieces on leading publications, news spots, national debates, and caucuses. Direct personal interactions with the community help to foster credibility for the candidates and the same case applies for businesses. As a business owner, you should make an effort to participate in local events, trade shows, and other events that give you the opportunity to put a face to your business’s name. Such events will also give you the opportunity to expand your network, generate leads, boost your brand awareness, and funnel clients to your store or website.
Position Yourself for the Massive Spending
Even before 2020 was here, analysts had long predicted that expenditure on political advertisements would hit new record highs, surging by billions above the previous presidential election period. With politicians and political parties splashing all these billions, there has to be something in it for your business. If you’re running a small business like a restaurant in your local area, don’t be surprised when political campaigners approach you and request for space to distribute their political campaign flyers from your premises, or if you’d be interested in displaying their campaign signage, like yard signs, in front of your business as for form of support. They might even want to pay you to have their campaign material in your premises if you’re located in a high traffic zone.
Prepare for Unprecedented Levels of Ad Displacement
Each presidential election period comes with a displacement of billions of dollars of advertisement spots by campaigners, political action committees, and politicians. While certain social media platforms will place restrictions on political advertisements, radio TV stations must adhere to the guidelines established by the Federal Communications Commission. This can result in TV and radio stations filling their schedules with more political advertisement spots than the stations would otherwise prefer to broadcast. With so much advertisement noise, and billions of dollars in ad spots being inaccessible to non-political marketers, the rivalry for the few available premium ad spots becomes as competitive and outrageous as Super Bowl commercials.
Find a Way Out of the Election Lethargy
Before you totally give up, contemplate the fact that content marketing always offers a higher return on investment as an option for certain segments of marketers and tactics. Besides that, there’s always more pressure to generate higher quality content in order to stand out from all the chaotic election noise.
Content targeted toward organic and inbound channels will definitely stand a better chance of bypassing the political hullabaloo and the costly paid channels. The bright side of it is that people feeling the lethargy of the election cycle will undoubtedly be actively looking for everything from funny memes and other entertainment, to your engaging and brilliantly marketed content.
In summary, small businesses don’t realize that they also have the same means and tools to execute similar strategies to those employed by presidential candidates. You can set aside resources from your business to participate in events, position yourself for the massive ad spending by political parties, choose the right marketing channels, and create awesome content to stay ahead of your competition. If candidates can win elections using these tactics, then your business can surely use them to its advantage too.


consciouslifenews--2020-11-01--Your Horoscope and Astrology Overview for November 02-08, 2020

The above video contains an astrological overview for the week of 2nd November 2020 .
To get this week 's video horoscope for your specific zodiac sign , click on the link corresponding to your sign : Mercury does indeed go direct in Libra on Tuesday , something we can all celebrate but important to remember , that the journey of the retrograde began in the sign of Scorpio , mid October , but the shadow period began on the 27th September .
Then Mercury reversed into Libra on the 28th of October , goes forwards this week but does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nor emerge from Shadow until the 19th of November .
Notice a theme through this whole situation ?
Poor testing regimes , muddled and mixed messaging from Governments regarding safeguarding , conspiracy theories taking even greater hold , chaotic changing travel rules = increase in Covid infections .
And even though Mercury goes forwards it remains in a tense right angle to Saturn in the authoritative Capricorn and see rules tightening .
This will see libertarians assert that Governments are being overbearing and anti democratic , the quieter majority will be fed up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to protect .
Track and Trace in the UK has been a miserable failure , another Mercury influenced issue , and this has been the third Water Sign Retrograde ( with some Air Gemini and now Libra component ) of the year , which has lead to a confusion , wild claims of efficacy followed by obvious failures .
With Jupiter tightly close to Pluto all week , death rates will likely remain high , but the damage has been done further back by Mars ' tense right angle to the posse in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which continues to next week .
This has seen many people reckless , defiant , rebellious .
Well , now we have the outcome for all of that .
The thing that defines Covid is not the death rate which is of course shocking but just how infectious it is .
With my Rheumatoid Arthritis we have had to be really careful , but folks have cast me dumbfounded looks that I would wear a mask .
That has been such a lot of personal attitudes that have driven it 's spread @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easily it spreads .
BUT there is hope at the end of this week , and this latest stage of this pandemic , and it comes in the guise of the Sun 's Trine to Neptune , which encourages us to be as caring as possible to those who are less fortunate .
Isolation remains the biggest threat to person-kind with our without Covid so the more we can stay in touch the better .
For more information on how this will pan or your zodiac sign or to watch your zodiac sign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Free Daily , Weekly and Monthly Horoscopes Conscious Life News Astrologer Patrick Arundell has been a professional Astrologer since 1993 .
Patrick has a real passion for astrology and sees it as a tool which can help any person to gain greater personal awareness , to better guide their life moves .
Patrick is a member of the Astrological Association of Great Britain and his work appears on websites and in magazines and newspapers , globally .
Enjoy Patrick ’ s forecasts every day on CLN .
Learn more about Patrick http : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Horoscope Reports based on your Time , if known , Date and Place of Birth here https : //www.patrickarundell.com/personal-horoscope-reports/

By Patrick Arundell | PatrickArundell.com
The above video contains an astrological overview for the week of 2nd November 2020.
To get this week's video horoscope for your specific zodiac sign, click on the link corresponding to your sign:
Mercury does indeed go direct in Libra on Tuesday, something we can all celebrate but important to remember, that the journey of the retrograde began in the sign of Scorpio, mid October, but the shadow period began on the 27th September. Then Mercury reversed into Libra on the 28th of October, goes forwards this week but doesn't return to Scorpio until next week nor emerge from Shadow until the 19th of November.
Notice a theme through this whole situation? Poor testing regimes, muddled and mixed messaging from Governments regarding safeguarding, conspiracy theories taking even greater hold, chaotic changing travel rules = increase in Covid infections.
And even though Mercury goes forwards it remains in a tense right angle to Saturn in the authoritative Capricorn and see rules tightening. This will see libertarians assert that Governments are being overbearing and anti democratic, the quieter majority will be fed up, but grudgingly accepting of the need to protect. Track and Trace in the UK has been a miserable failure, another Mercury influenced issue, and this has been the third Water Sign Retrograde (with some Air Gemini and now Libra component) of the year, which has lead to a confusion, wild claims of efficacy followed by obvious failures.
With Jupiter tightly close to Pluto all week, death rates will likely remain high, but the damage has been done further back by Mars' tense right angle to the posse in Capricorn, and it's own Retrograde, which continues to next week. This has seen many people reckless, defiant, rebellious. Well, now we have the outcome for all of that. The thing that defines Covid is not the death rate which is of course shocking but just how infectious it is. With my Rheumatoid Arthritis we have had to be really careful, but folks have cast me dumbfounded looks that I would wear a mask. That has been such a lot of personal attitudes that have driven it's spread, with a fantastic naivety of how easily it spreads.
BUT there is hope at the end of this week, and this latest stage of this pandemic, and it comes in the guise of the Sun's Trine to Neptune, which encourages us to be as caring as possible to those who are less fortunate. Isolation remains the biggest threat to person-kind with our without Covid so the more we can stay in touch the better. For more information on how this will pan or your zodiac sign or to watch your zodiac sign Weekly Video forecast or join me at Free Daily, Weekly and Monthly Horoscopes
Conscious Life News Astrologer Patrick Arundell has been a professional Astrologer since 1993. Patrick has a real passion for astrology and sees it as a tool which can help any person to gain greater personal awareness, to better guide their life moves. Patrick is a member of the Astrological Association of Great Britain and his work appears on websites and in magazines and newspapers, globally. Enjoy Patrick’s forecasts every day on CLN. Learn more about Patrick http://www.patrickarundell.com or order one of his Personal Horoscope Reports based on your Time, if known, Date and Place of Birth here https://www.patrickarundell.com/personal-horoscope-reports/