renegadetribune--2020-10-31--Jews are not Whites

Jews are not Whites

As the anti-white genocide starts digs in , now some Jews are claiming that they are in-fact not white , they are Ashkenazi Jews , descended Jews from the original Hebrews in the middle-east .
In these times of racial strife and blame of Whites as the sole cause of non-white suffering , the Jews are quickly asserting that they are in-fact NOT WHITE and are begging BLM and ANTIFA to not blame them , loot their stores , or riot in their neighborhoods because they claim that they are “ not the problem ” but rather they too suffered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that “ Whiteness ” is to take a supremacist position over the other races , including the Jews , who point to the Holocaust as the fact that they have been persecuted by the Gentiles ( White Non-Jews ) , treated as non-whites and not included in the gentile society .
They also claim that Whiteness is to uphold patriarchy and engage in systemic racism .
Though Jews in America have enjoyed what they call White Privilege , they claim that White antisemitism has greatly harmed their communities , and created injustices such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are victims just as the Negro is a victim , just as the Native American is a victim , and just as all non-whites are victims of the Gentiles .
We can no longer let others define us .
We need to start defining ourselves .
And the only way to do that is through learning about our ancestry , our genetics and our indigenous connection to the land , culture and language of Israel.
” - Jewish Journal Of course , the Jews blame the Gentiles for their ills and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they cry out , “ Not me ” and point the finger at the Non-Jew as the criminal .

I’m not white, I’m Jewish!” – Paul Kivel
As the anti-white genocide starts digs in, now some Jews are claiming that they are in-fact not white, they are Ashkenazi Jews, descended Jews from the original Hebrews in the middle-east.
Being white is not just a matter of identifying as white; it involves being treated as white.” – Kwame Anthony Appiah
In these times of racial strife and blame of Whites as the sole cause of non-white suffering, the Jews are quickly asserting that they are in-fact NOT WHITE and are begging BLM and ANTIFA to not blame them, loot their stores, or riot in their neighborhoods because they claim that they are “not the problem” but rather they too suffered under the Whites.
The Jews affirm that “Whiteness” is to take a supremacist position over the other races, including the Jews, who point to the Holocaust as the fact that they have been persecuted by the Gentiles (White Non-Jews), treated as non-whites and not included in the gentile society. They also claim that Whiteness is to uphold patriarchy and engage in systemic racism.
Though Jews in America have enjoyed what they call White Privilege, they claim that White antisemitism has greatly harmed their communities, and created injustices such as the Holocaust. They claim that they are victims just as the Negro is a victim, just as the Native American is a victim, and just as all non-whites are victims of the Gentiles.
We can no longer let others define us. We need to start defining ourselves. And the only way to do that is through learning about our ancestry, our genetics and our indigenous connection to the land, culture and language of Israel.”- Jewish Journal
Of course, the Jews blame the Gentiles for their ills and that of the world. Of course, they cry out, “Not me” and point the finger at the Non-Jew as the criminal.
Share now!
Author: Lassitor Steel Lassitor is a white male of Northern European descent who has studied far-eastern theology (Buddhism) and has doctorate recognition for his works on the subject of Zen Buddhism and religious meditation. He has written a lot about zen meditation, logic, critical thinking, and about cults and how they operate. Currently live in Las Vegas, Nevada USA Lassitor is a white male of Northern European descent who has studied far-eastern theology (Buddhism) and has doctorate recognition for his works on the subject of Zen Buddhism and religious meditation. He has written a lot about zen meditation, logic, critical thinking, and about cults and how they operate. Currently live in Las Vegas, Nevada USA


renegadetribune--2020-11-01--U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Fraud

U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Fraud

A standard air-raid shelter door is displayed at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum along with the claim that it is a casting of the door to a homicidal gassing chamber at the Majdanek concentration camp .
The peephole was supposed to be for monitoring the progress of killing with cyanide gas released from a common fumigation product called Zyklon B .
Those looking through it were sometimes said to do so to monitor and improve the efficiency of the killing system , but a more common charge is that it was done for sadistic personal pleasure .
Many are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so great that they derived great amusement and satisfaction from watching their death throes , as well as engaging in bizarre forms of harassment and torture , some of them quite fantastic , bordering on the supernatural .
There ’ s been a steady tendency for the claims to increase their variety and horrific detail with the passage of time , perhaps showing the dubious phenomenon of recovered memory enjoying its most productive period ever .
The realities of the myths that sprang from a thirst for vengeance and are sustained by it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a memorial industry and reparations in the billions of dollars that depend on it totally , are often very different .
At left : The door at the concentration camp Majdanek from which the USHMM made the replica which is now on display in Washington D.C. At right : The real function of the door and thousands more like it is shown in a widely distributed German ad for bomb-shelter doors and window covers , intended for military and civilian use .
Approximately 670,000+ German civilians were killed in the massive Allied terror-bombing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The door and window shutter ( Türen und Blenden ) on the right appear in an advertisement for equipment to outfit the thousands of air-raid shelters built across Germany and occupied territories , including the concentration camps .
( See : Technique and Operation of German Anti-Gas Shelters in World War II , by Samuel Crowell ) As noted in the Crowell article , and several more to come , it has recently been discovered that German air-raid shelters were required to also provide protection against gas attack .
With WWII coming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the horrors of gas warfare then were relatively fresh , and the Germans took more defensive measures than most since the conflict was sure to be played out again on European soil .
The peepholes in the doors were for safety purposes .
People inside wanted to be able to see conditions outside before exposing themselves to possible danger , and rescuers from outside had the same concern , plus wanting to make a quick evaluation without opening the door in order to save precious time ( seeing if everyone was dead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
Steadily , piece by piece , the sources of the myth are being exposed at an accelerating pace .
Camps inside the borders of Germany were available for inspection by many people after the war , and the adamant accusations of killing centers there made in 1945-46 were officially admitted to be false in 1960 .
Despite this , or perhaps because of it , show trials were held to reinforce the story in the public mind , particularly and most successfully in Germany , and another group of German veterans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and often quite unbelievable oral testimonies , as at the earlier kangaroo trials .
There , accusations that someone struck a prisoner were sufficient to result in a death sentence for participating in a conspiracy to commit crimes against humanity .
It was not necessary to prove that the person killed anyone , only that he or she played an active part in a sprawling system that did so .
Despite the fact that the false allegations about mass gassing chambers in Dachau and other German camps came from some of the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Treblinka and Madjanek , there was no call to question the now suspect testimony .
It was accepted as fully true with no hesitation .
But with the fall of the Soviet Union and the opening of many of its archives , fresh eyes and attitudes are actively seeking the truth of the matter and in the process finding truth to be a scarce commodity when atrocity charges are involved .
The now Religion of the Holocaust has defenders as fiercely immune to logic and a concern for truth as any fundamentalist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , at some point the burden of supporting the unsupportable will become too hard and too dangerous , and we predict that at that time the gas chamber canard will be quietly abandoned in favor of the real and documented wrongs of a lesser but still horrible magnitude .
Perhaps the Allied powers will one day own up to their own crimes , committed in an effort to grind the will of the German people into dust so that they would not pose a future threat to those who consider domination of world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possession .
Almost 15 million Germans were summarily expelled from their homelands that in some cases went back 700 years or more , cast into the harshest European winter in a century with only what they could grab and carry .
More than two million of them died of starvation , disease , and merciless attacks from those they encountered on their frozen paths of desperation .
It was a pogrom of a magnitude unmatched in recorded history , and not only have the victims never received any kind of compensation , their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a virulent anti-German bias that flourishes in the corridors of power .
The innocent souls of the German victims are surely as worthy of acknowledgement as any other group victimized , and the situation cries out for justice , for at least a chronicling of the truth .
That lot will fall to another generation , but this will be the one to force a public and honest re-examination of what really went on inside the German forced labor camps from 1940 to 1945 .
Any who feel threatened by truth or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the validity of their own positions than do their critics .
A remarkably sinister rendering of the air raid shelter door casting at the USHMM , found at their student outreach web offering [ http : //www.ushmm.org/misc-bin/add_goback/outreach/892-1.htm , but now moved or removed ; ed. ]
.
The caption there was : “ This casting of a door to the gas chamber in the Majdanek killing center , near Lublin , Poland , was commissioned by the United States Holocaust Museum in 1989 .
Majdanek functioned as a concentration camp , forced-labor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gas chamber in Majdanek was fitted with an airtight metal door .
It was bolted shut before gas entered the chamber inside .
SS guards could observe the killing process through peepholes in the upper center of the door.
” But , as can be seen from the ads and Crowell ’ s article , this is just one of thousands of such doors that were produced in an attempt to keep the people in Germany from being blasted into eternity by the relentless carpet-bombings .
NOTE : The original ads were black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contrast and easier viewing .

U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Fraud
USHMM displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek By David Thomas Published: 1997-07-12
A standard air-raid shelter door is displayed at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum along with the claim that it is a casting of the door to a homicidal gassing chamber at the Majdanek concentration camp. The peephole was supposed to be for monitoring the progress of killing with cyanide gas released from a common fumigation product called Zyklon B. Those looking through it were sometimes said to do so to monitor and improve the efficiency of the killing system, but a more common charge is that it was done for sadistic personal pleasure.
Many are convinced that German hatred for jews was so great that they derived great amusement and satisfaction from watching their death throes, as well as engaging in bizarre forms of harassment and torture, some of them quite fantastic, bordering on the supernatural. There’s been a steady tendency for the claims to increase their variety and horrific detail with the passage of time, perhaps showing the dubious phenomenon of recovered memory enjoying its most productive period ever.
The realities of the myths that sprang from a thirst for vengeance and are sustained by it still, with the added factor of a memorial industry and reparations in the billions of dollars that depend on it totally, are often very different.
At left: The door at the concentration camp Majdanek from which the USHMM made the replica which is now on display in Washington D.C.
At right: The real function of the door and thousands more like it is shown in a widely distributed German ad for bomb-shelter doors and window covers, intended for military and civilian use. Approximately 670,000+ German civilians were killed in the massive Allied terror-bombing campaign directed at population centers throughout Germany.
The door and window shutter (Türen und Blenden) on the right appear in an advertisement for equipment to outfit the thousands of air-raid shelters built across Germany and occupied territories, including the concentration camps. (See: Technique and Operation of German Anti-Gas Shelters in World War II , by Samuel Crowell) As noted in the Crowell article, and several more to come, it has recently been discovered that German air-raid shelters were required to also provide protection against gas attack. With WWII coming only 20 years after WWI, memory of the horrors of gas warfare then were relatively fresh, and the Germans took more defensive measures than most since the conflict was sure to be played out again on European soil.
The peepholes in the doors were for safety purposes. People inside wanted to be able to see conditions outside before exposing themselves to possible danger, and rescuers from outside had the same concern, plus wanting to make a quick evaluation without opening the door in order to save precious time (seeing if everyone was dead, or if no one was inside).
Steadily, piece by piece, the sources of the myth are being exposed at an accelerating pace. Camps inside the borders of Germany were available for inspection by many people after the war, and the adamant accusations of killing centers there made in 1945-46 were officially admitted to be false in 1960. Despite this, or perhaps because of it, show trials were held to reinforce the story in the public mind, particularly and most successfully in Germany, and another group of German veterans were convicted based on flimsy, contradictory and often quite unbelievable oral testimonies, as at the earlier kangaroo trials. There, accusations that someone struck a prisoner were sufficient to result in a death sentence for participating in a conspiracy to commit crimes against humanity. It was not necessary to prove that the person killed anyone, only that he or she played an active part in a sprawling system that did so. Despite the fact that the false allegations about mass gassing chambers in Dachau and other German camps came from some of the same sources that made similar charges about Auschwitz, Treblinka and Madjanek, there was no call to question the now suspect testimony. It was accepted as fully true with no hesitation.
But with the fall of the Soviet Union and the opening of many of its archives, fresh eyes and attitudes are actively seeking the truth of the matter and in the process finding truth to be a scarce commodity when atrocity charges are involved. The now Religion of the Holocaust has defenders as fiercely immune to logic and a concern for truth as any fundamentalist religion that has ever existed. Nevertheless, at some point the burden of supporting the unsupportable will become too hard and too dangerous, and we predict that at that time the gas chamber canard will be quietly abandoned in favor of the real and documented wrongs of a lesser but still horrible magnitude.
Perhaps the Allied powers will one day own up to their own crimes, committed in an effort to grind the will of the German people into dust so that they would not pose a future threat to those who consider domination of world trade and finance to be their exclusive possession. Almost 15 million Germans were summarily expelled from their homelands that in some cases went back 700 years or more, cast into the harshest European winter in a century with only what they could grab and carry. More than two million of them died of starvation, disease, and merciless attacks from those they encountered on their frozen paths of desperation. It was a pogrom of a magnitude unmatched in recorded history, and not only have the victims never received any kind of compensation, their story is known to very few because of a virulent anti-German bias that flourishes in the corridors of power. The innocent souls of the German victims are surely as worthy of acknowledgement as any other group victimized, and the situation cries out for justice, for at least a chronicling of the truth.
That lot will fall to another generation, but this will be the one to force a public and honest re-examination of what really went on inside the German forced labor camps from 1940 to 1945. Any who feel threatened by truth or the search for it say far more about the validity of their own positions than do their critics.
© 7/12/1997


renegadetribune--2020-11-01--Frank Walton’s British Landscapes

Frank Walton’s British Landscapes

FRANK WALTON was born in London on 10th July 1840 .
He was a landscape and coastal painter in both @ @ @ @ @ exhibited at the Royal Academy from 1862 until 1924 .
He was elected a full @ @ @ @ @ of Painters in Watercolour in 1882 , a full Member of the Royal Oil Painters @ @ @ @ @ its President in 1898 .
He was also elected an Honorary Membership of the Royal @ @ @ @ @ was a Member of the Royal Society of British Artists .
He exhibited 101 paintings @ @ @ @ @ 230 at the RI , 137 at the ROI , as well as numerous other @ @ @ @ @

From a cache of Antiques Atlas:
FRANK WALTON was born in London on 10th July 1840. He was a landscape and coastal painter in both oil and watercolour. He exhibited at the Royal Academy from 1862 until 1924. He was elected a full Member of the Royal Institute of Painters in Watercolour in 1882, a full Member of the Royal Oil Painters Institute in 1883 and became its President in 1898. He was also elected an Honorary Membership of the Royal Society of Miniature Painters and was a Member of the Royal Society of British Artists.
He exhibited 101 paintings at the Royal Academy, 230 at the RI, 137 at the ROI, as well as numerous other London and provincial galleries.


renegadetribune--2020-11-01--Congress Cranks Out Legislation for Israel: The Details

Congress has been cranking out legislation that bankrolls & benefits Israel at a remarkable pace during the current congressional session .
Here ’ s a rundown… To see how Senators have been voting view this detailed Scoreboard .
Since Israel ’ s founding in 1948 , it has received ( adjusting for inflation ) more than $ 252.7 billion from the U.S. – an amount that the majority of Americans consider excessive .
In spite of its consistent , long , documented history of frequent human rights violations ( often not reported in US media ) and discrimination , Congress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s victim ( read more about aid to Israel here and here ) .
The sheer quantity – and expense – of the advocacy work that our Congress has done on behalf of this pariah state are staggering : consider the hours spent in meetings , negotiation , research , and floor debates , the trips and calls to Israel , to name a few .
And while only a handful of the almost one hundred proposed bills will become law , our legislators will have spent their time ( and our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addressing American needs and concerns – especially in this time of pandemic , economic crisis , and civil unrest .
Plus , the legislation that is enacted inevitably cost Americans taxpayers massive amount of money .
Skim the partial list below to get a taste of what our legislators have been doing in the last two years on behalf of Israel ; for more detail , please read this , this , and this – commentary on the legislation we have provided throughout the congressional session .
Another useful tool is the congressional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These track all Israel-related legislation and who supported it in the current session .
LEGISLATION FOR MORE WEAPONS TO ISRAEL A study of military aid to Israel uncovers a bottomless pit that only starts with $ 3.3 billion per year ( recently changed from a “ maximum ” to a “ minimum ” amount of assistance ) , guaranteed for the next ten years .
Another $ 500 million is immediately added each year , specifically for Israel ’ s Iron Dome , a massive ( and expensive ) anti-missile defense weapon .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ expend an additional $ 9 million per day on behalf of Israel , making the combined total $ 19 million per day on behalf of Israel ( and this estimate may be low ) .
Iron Dome is used to counter small projectiles shot from Gaza , the main form of resistance coming from Palestinians in the Strip .
Rockets from Gaza have killed a total of 30 Israelis in the past twenty years , while Israeli airstrikes again Gaza have killed thousands of Palestinians .
S.3176 and H.R.1837 lay out the basic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year .
In addition , the legislation would give the President authority to provide Israel with unlimited weaponry and assistance if “ needed ” without prior authorization from Congress .
These bills also lay the groundwork for millions in new funding for various additional programs benefiting Israel ( which will be discussed below ) .
( Read more about some unscrupulous Congressional actions related to S.3176 . )
These bills defy the Leahy Laws , which clearly state that , “ when credible evidence of human rights violations exists , US aid must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Leahy Laws , read this . )
LEGISLATION ON US COLLABORATION WITH ISRAEL Collaboration with Israel ( i.e .
entangling us with a foreign pariah country ) is a recurring theme in Congress .
Below are several examples among many .
H.R.1459 endorses collaboration in security and law enforcement training between the US and Israel to “ promote security against terrorism , peaceful resolutions to community disputes , and the protection of spaces for civil society.
” American law enforcement personnel have received training from Israel for years – in spite of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ S.3775 seeks , in the words of Foundation for Defense of Democracies ( recognized as an arm of the Israel lobby ) reports that this bill seeks to create a “ permanent and dedicated forum ” for “ [ sharing ] intelligence-informed military capabilities.
” H.R.2488 and S.2309 and H.R.7148 seeks to bring the US and Israel together to collaborate on cybersecurity and defense technology , in spite of Israel ’ s history of spying on the US , infringing on the decisions of our President , and attacking an American Naval ship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US and “ Middle Eastern countries , such as Israel ” in developing hydropower technology – adding an irrelevant caveat that prioritizes countries with trade relationships with Israel .
H.R.7613 would set aside money for many American projects , including hurricane preparedness , clean energy .
Inexplicably , it includes millions for a “ US-Israel Cooperative Energy Center.
” S.3722 and H.R.6829 authorize funding for the US to collaborate with Israel in the development of health technologies , including COVID-19 .
Ironically , Israel has shut down or destroyed a number of Palestinian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a pandemic economic recovery bill , includes sections on safely returning Americans to work ; job creation ; retirement security ; safely returning kids to school ; COVID cures and treatment ; and miscellaneous .
Israel is embedded in this bill too .
Under “ COVID cures and treatment , ” the bill proposes $ 12 million over a three-year period to collaborate with Israel ( a tiny country funded by American taxpayers ) vis-a-vis the coronavirus .
H.R.5063 is legislation seeking to increase US-Israel collaboration on anti-drone weapons – specifically for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been targeting Iran for decades . )
The bill would bankroll Israel ’ s already lucrative development of cyberweapons , which would then be tested on Palestinians and sold around the world – including to human rights violators and enemies of the U.S. S.4522 seeks to authorize “ such sums as are necessary ” for a US-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund .
( Some Americans might wish this money to instead go to struggling American farmers . )
H.R.5605 proposes funding for a US-Israel PTSD Collaborative Research Program .
If Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many organizations that have reported on Israel ’ s victim-blaming and whitewashing of Palestinian suffering and extensive PTSD .
Vox reports that between 2005 and 2014 , 23 out of every 24 conflict-related deaths have been Palestinian .
Tragically , Palestinians ’ experiences would provide a more abundant field for PTSD research than Israelis ’ .
54 % of Gazan children who experienced heavy bombardment in the 2014 Israeli incursion known as Operation Protective Edge , suffer from severe PTSD .
( Fyi – Vastly more Palestinians are killed than Israelis . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been overlooked in all of these bills , Res.324 “ Recognizing the importance of the US-Israel economic relationship , ” makes a blanket statement “ encouraging new areas of cooperation ” ( and US money funneled to Israel ) .
S.852 , H.R.4009 , H.R.221 , H.Res.72 , H.Res.241 , S.Res.189 , H.Res.183 , H.R.943 , S.2085 , H.Res.782 , and H.Res.837 cover various angles of an important topic : anti-Semitism .
The issue turns a corner in each of these bills when they improperly equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antisemitism accusation is a “ trick ” to cover up Israeli crimes . )
The US staunchly defends Israel against all reproof , whether from the UN , journalists , or private citizens ( see BDS , below ) .
( For more , read this , this , this , and this . )
S.2132 is designed to put Palestine in an impossible situation : choosing between financial solvency and international legitimacy .
The bill would make the Palestinian government liable in potentially devastating lawsuits – unless it stops its quest for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ read about the bill here ) .
S.Res .
570 opposes the possible prosecution by the International Criminal Court of both Americans and Israelis validly accused of war crimes .
Instead of calling for due process , the bill calls for impunity and considers the ICC a foe .
( One of the few bills not on behalf of Israel , H.Res.855 points out that the US has never become a member of the ICC , and encourages it to do so . )
H.R.28 seeks to withhold aid from any country that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nations – referring specifically to the official American position of defending Israel ’ s atrocities .
H.Res.727 affirms US support for Israel ’ s “ right to defend itself from terrorist attacks ” and condemns Hamas rockets ( without condemning Israel for the violence that brought on resistance ) .
In the year before the resolution was introduced , four Israelis had been killed by rockets from Gaza ; Israeli snipers and airstrikes had in the same period killed over 150 Gazans .
H.R.2343 , the so-called “ Peace and Tolerance in Palestinian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failure of the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA to keep Palestinian textbooks free from incitement or intolerance toward Israeli Jews .
These allegations have persisted for years thanks to a faux , pro-Israel “ peace ” organization called the “ Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace ” ( more info here ) .
In fact , the opposite is true : Israeli textbooks consistently “ marginalize Palestinians , legitimize Israeli military action and reinforce Jewish-Israeli territorial identity.
” H.R.1850 , S.2680 , H.R.4411 , and H.Res.1131 all address the issue of terrorism – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different groups .
What Israel considers terrorism is , to Palestinians , resistance against illegal occupation ; what Israel considers military action , Palestinians see as state terrorism – consider this and this .
The most basic fact that these bills ignore is that while Israel ’ s 53-year occupation of Palestinian territories violates international law , resistance against that occupation is a protected right .
( They also ignore the way the state of Israel was established . )
The charge of Palestinian “ terrorism ” is problematic to say the least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weapons and the low number of Israeli victims , vs. Israel ’ s advanced military and the high number of Palestinian victims it creates ( read more about terrorism here and about Israel ’ s actions here ) .
Israel has been named an exporter of terrorism , as reported by Amnesty International .
Two of its first prime ministers had led terrorist groups .
Israeli human rights organization B ’ Tselem reports that , between 2000 and 2019 , Palestinian militants killed a total of 301 Israeli civilians , while Israeli security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not involved in hostilities .
S.4482 seeks to police the Arab world , hunting down governments that punish their citizens who engage in personal relationships with Israelis .
While the US wants to scold Arab countries for resentment toward Israel , it allows Israel to attack its Palestinian neighbors and violate their human rights daily .
H.R.7850 seeks to police Iran and the resistance groups that it may support .
The bill is part of the ongoing effort by Israel and its partisans to target Iran ( read more about Iran here and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ H.Res.1110 declare that the establishment of full diplomatic relations between the State of Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain are historic achievements , and encourage other Arab countries to follow suit , ignoring the issue of justice for Palestinians .
The normalization of relations with Arab countries gives Israel a veneer of legitimacy while giving them access to US-made weapons – and giving the US and Israel access to Arab money .
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was jubilant : “ Everyone can see the fruits of this peace accord .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Israel , hundreds of millions of shekels .
It ’ s already happening and it will happen even more.. ” More treaties are expected , bought and paid for by the US .
H.R.3723 addresses the issue of aiding drought-stricken areas of the US , and prioritizes projects that have worked with international partners “ such as the state of Israel.
” There is great irony in the idea of Israeli experts assisting with water projects in the US : is simple : Israel provides plenteous water to its Jewish residents for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegally on Palestinian land ) , but is perpetrating a water catastrophe in the Palestinian territories – refusing to provide water to some areas , selling it at exorbitant prices to others .
In Gaza , water is “ scarce and mostly unfit for human use.
” In several pieces of legislation – including H.Res.326 , H.Res .
518 , S.Res.234 , and S.567 – Congress attempts to impose decisions about land in Middle East countries ( some of the decisions contravene international law ) .
H.R.5595 , S.Res.120 , H.R.336 , H.Res.314 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extinguish the Boycott , Divest , and Sanction ( BDS ) movement , which puts nonviolent pressure on Israel to obey international law .
BDS patterns itself after the movement that aided in ending apartheid in South Africa , and “ upholds the simple principle that Palestinians are entitled to the same rights as the rest of humanity.
” Much has been written about BDS ( for example , read this and this ) .
S.Res.745 and H.Res.1173 honor “ the life , legacy , and example of former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death ” – a man whose life ’ s work has been whitewashed to erase atrocities against the Palestinian people .
H.R.7900 addresses the issue of organ donation in the US , and gives a shout-out to Israel for its “ exemplary ” program – although Spain ’ s is considered the best in the world , and Israel made improvements only to reform its reputation as a favorite destination for illegal organ trafficking .
S.3409 and H.R.6392 , S.919 , H.R.914 , H.R.336 , H.Res.12 , S.Res.153 , and H.Res.310 propose various @ @ @ @ @ @ @ APPEARS TO BE PRO-PALESTINE , BUT ISN ’ T S.Res.171 seeks to restore economic aid to the Palestinians without bringing an end to the programs that caused Palestinians to be in need of aid – thus enabling Israel to continue unchecked in its oppression .
H.R.3104 promotes “ joint economic development and finance ventures between Palestinian entrepreneurs and companies and those in the US and Israel.
” Rep. Chris Coons , one of the bill ’ s sponsors , explained , “ job creation is the best way to turn people away from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are the violent party , and that employment – not freedom or self-determination – is the solution .
H.R.8050 would prohibit the US government from recognizing Israel ’ s claim of sovereignty over parts of the West Bank , or assisting Israel with those efforts – because it violates international law .
The international community , many Israelis , and many staunch Israel partisans , agree .
H.R.2407 seeks to protect Palestinian children from incarceration and torture by Israel using US aid money .
It seeks not to end the practice , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Read more about the bill here . )
Although its language is mild and pro-child , the bill has been attacked aggressively by pro-Israel groups .
H.Res.496 , the only pro-boycott bill , supports the right of Americans to take part in a political practice long used by Americans across the political spectrum .
The bill does not mention Israel or Palestine – yet it has been denounced as “ anti-Semitic.
” If Americans Knew has checked every legislator ’ s voting record on every Israel-related bill since January 2019 , and reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you will make your voice heard in this election – and throughout the next congressional session – to bring accountability to our government vis-a-vis Israel , and to Israel vis-a-vis Palestine .
To view all the bills and Senators ’ /challengers ’ record see this : Kathryn Shihadah is staff writer for If Americans Knew .
She also writes for MintPress News and blogs at Palestine Home .

Congress has been cranking out legislation that bankrolls & benefits Israel at a remarkable pace during the current congressional session. Here’s a rundown…
To see how Senators have been voting view this detailed Scoreboard.
By Kathryn Shihadah
Since Israel’s founding in 1948, it has received (adjusting for inflation) more than $252.7 billion from the U.S. – an amount that the majority of Americans consider excessive. In spite of its consistent, long, documented history of frequent human rights violations (often not reported in US media) and discrimination, Congress seeks to reward Israel and chastise Israel’s victim (read more about aid to Israel here and here).
The sheer quantity – and expense – of the advocacy work that our Congress has done on behalf of this pariah state are staggering: consider the hours spent in meetings, negotiation, research, and floor debates, the trips and calls to Israel, to name a few.
And while only a handful of the almost one hundred proposed bills will become law, our legislators will have spent their time (and our money) on them, instead of addressing American needs and concerns – especially in this time of pandemic, economic crisis, and civil unrest. Plus, the legislation that is enacted inevitably cost Americans taxpayers massive amount of money.
Skim the partial list below to get a taste of what our legislators have been doing in the last two years on behalf of Israel; for more detail, please read this, this, and this – commentary on the legislation we have provided throughout the congressional session.
Another useful tool is the congressional scoreboards created by If Americans Knew. These track all Israel-related legislation and who supported it in the current session.
LEGISLATION FOR MORE WEAPONS TO ISRAEL
A study of military aid to Israel uncovers a bottomless pit that only starts with $3.3 billion per year (recently changed from a “maximum” to a “minimum” amount of assistance), guaranteed for the next ten years. Another $500 million is immediately added each year, specifically for Israel’s Iron Dome, a massive (and expensive) anti-missile defense weapon.
On top of this, some bills expend an additional $9 million per day on behalf of Israel, making the combined total $19 million per day on behalf of Israel (and this estimate may be low).
Iron Dome is used to counter small projectiles shot from Gaza, the main form of resistance coming from Palestinians in the Strip. Rockets from Gaza have killed a total of 30 Israelis in the past twenty years, while Israeli airstrikes again Gaza have killed thousands of Palestinians.
S.3176 and H.R.1837 lay out the basic premise for the $3.3 billion a year. In addition, the legislation would give the President authority to provide Israel with unlimited weaponry and assistance if “needed” without prior authorization from Congress.
These bills also lay the groundwork for millions in new funding for various additional programs benefiting Israel (which will be discussed below). (Read more about some unscrupulous Congressional actions related to S.3176.)
These bills defy the Leahy Laws, which clearly state that, “when credible evidence of human rights violations exists, US aid must stop.” (For more on the Leahy Laws, read this.)
Other military aid bills include S.4049, S.4474, H.R.8494, S.Res.669, H.R.7617, H.R.7608, and H.R.1795.
LEGISLATION ON US COLLABORATION WITH ISRAEL
Collaboration with Israel (i.e. entangling us with a foreign pariah country) is a recurring theme in Congress. Below are several examples among many.
H.R.1459 endorses collaboration in security and law enforcement training between the US and Israel to “promote security against terrorism, peaceful resolutions to community disputes, and the protection of spaces for civil society.”
American law enforcement personnel have received training from Israel for years – in spite of the brutality of its military and police.
S.3775 seeks, in the words of Foundation for Defense of Democracies (recognized as an arm of the Israel lobby) reports that this bill seeks to create a “permanent and dedicated forum” for “[sharing] intelligence-informed military capabilities.”
H.R.2488 and S.2309 and H.R.7148 seeks to bring the US and Israel together to collaborate on cybersecurity and defense technology, in spite of Israel’s history of spying on the US, infringing on the decisions of our President, and attacking an American Naval ship.
S.4228 stresses binational collaboration between the US and “Middle Eastern countries, such as Israel” in developing hydropower technology – adding an irrelevant caveat that prioritizes countries with trade relationships with Israel.
H.R.7613 would set aside money for many American projects, including hurricane preparedness, clean energy. Inexplicably, it includes millions for a “US-Israel Cooperative Energy Center.”
S.3722 and H.R.6829 authorize funding for the US to collaborate with Israel in the development of health technologies, including COVID-19. Ironically, Israel has shut down or destroyed a number of Palestinian COVID clinics in recent months.
S.4537, a pandemic economic recovery bill, includes sections on safely returning Americans to work; job creation; retirement security; safely returning kids to school; COVID cures and treatment; and miscellaneous. Israel is embedded in this bill too. Under “COVID cures and treatment,” the bill proposes $12 million over a three-year period to collaborate with Israel (a tiny country funded by American taxpayers) vis-a-vis the coronavirus.
H.R.5063 is legislation seeking to increase US-Israel collaboration on anti-drone weapons – specifically for use against Iran. (Israel has been targeting Iran for decades.) The bill would bankroll Israel’s already lucrative development of cyberweapons, which would then be tested on Palestinians and sold around the world – including to human rights violators and enemies of the U.S.
S.4522 seeks to authorize “such sums as are necessary” for a US-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund. (Some Americans might wish this money to instead go to struggling American farmers.)
H.R.5605 proposes funding for a US-Israel PTSD Collaborative Research Program. If Americans Knew and B’Tselem are among many organizations that have reported on Israel’s victim-blaming and whitewashing of Palestinian suffering and extensive PTSD.
Vox reports that between 2005 and 2014, 23 out of every 24 conflict-related deaths have been Palestinian. Tragically, Palestinians’ experiences would provide a more abundant field for PTSD research than Israelis’. 54% of Gazan children who experienced heavy bombardment in the 2014 Israeli incursion known as Operation Protective Edge, suffer from severe PTSD. (Fyi – Vastly more Palestinians are killed than Israelis.)
In case some potential areas of collaboration had been overlooked in all of these bills, Res.324 “Recognizing the importance of the US-Israel economic relationship,” makes a blanket statement “encouraging new areas of cooperation” (and US money funneled to Israel).
LEGISLATION ON ANTI-SEMITISM AND HOLOCAUST EDUCATION
S.852, H.R.4009, H.R.221, H.Res.72, H.Res.241, S.Res.189, H.Res.183, H.R.943, S.2085, H.Res.782, and H.Res.837 cover various angles of an important topic: anti-Semitism. The issue turns a corner in each of these bills when they improperly equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel (an Israeli official once explained that the antisemitism accusation is a “trick” to cover up Israeli crimes.) The US staunchly defends Israel against all reproof, whether from the UN, journalists, or private citizens (see BDS, below). (For more, read this, this, this, and this.)
LEGISLATION DEMONIZING ISRAEL’S ENEMIES, CONGRATULATING ITS “FRIENDS”
S.2132 is designed to put Palestine in an impossible situation: choosing between financial solvency and international legitimacy. The bill would make the Palestinian government liable in potentially devastating lawsuits – unless it stops its quest for justice and recognition in the world (read about the bill here).
S.Res. 570 opposes the possible prosecution by the International Criminal Court of both Americans and Israelis validly accused of war crimes. Instead of calling for due process, the bill calls for impunity and considers the ICC a foe. (One of the few bills not on behalf of Israel, H.Res.855 points out that the US has never become a member of the ICC, and encourages it to do so.)
H.R.28 seeks to withhold aid from any country that disagrees with the US at the United Nations – referring specifically to the official American position of defending Israel’s atrocities.
H.Res.727 affirms US support for Israel’s “right to defend itself from terrorist attacks” and condemns Hamas rockets (without condemning Israel for the violence that brought on resistance).
In the year before the resolution was introduced, four Israelis had been killed by rockets from Gaza; Israeli snipers and airstrikes had in the same period killed over 150 Gazans.
H.R.2343, the so-called “Peace and Tolerance in Palestinian Education Act,” addresses the alleged failure of the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA to keep Palestinian textbooks free from incitement or intolerance toward Israeli Jews.
These allegations have persisted for years thanks to a faux, pro-Israel “peace” organization called the “Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace” (more info here). In fact, the opposite is true: Israeli textbooks consistently “marginalize Palestinians, legitimize Israeli military action and reinforce Jewish-Israeli territorial identity.”
H.R.1850, S.2680, H.R.4411, and H.Res.1131 all address the issue of terrorism – a word that means different things to different groups. What Israel considers terrorism is, to Palestinians, resistance against illegal occupation; what Israel considers military action, Palestinians see as state terrorism – consider this and this.
The most basic fact that these bills ignore is that while Israel’s 53-year occupation of Palestinian territories violates international law, resistance against that occupation is a protected right. (They also ignore the way the state of Israel was established.)
The charge of Palestinian “terrorism” is problematic to say the least, given the relative impotence of Palestinian weapons and the low number of Israeli victims, vs. Israel’s advanced military and the high number of Palestinian victims it creates (read more about terrorism here and about Israel’s actions here).
Israel has been named an exporter of terrorism, as reported by Amnesty International. Two of its first prime ministers had led terrorist groups.
Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem reports that, between 2000 and 2019, Palestinian militants killed a total of 301 Israeli civilians, while Israeli security forces killed over 5,200 Palestinians who were not involved in hostilities.
S.4482 seeks to police the Arab world, hunting down governments that punish their citizens who engage in personal relationships with Israelis. While the US wants to scold Arab countries for resentment toward Israel, it allows Israel to attack its Palestinian neighbors and violate their human rights daily.
H.R.7850 seeks to police Iran and the resistance groups that it may support. The bill is part of the ongoing effort by Israel and its partisans to target Iran (read more about Iran here and here).
S.Res.709, S.Res.713, H.Res.1110 declare that the establishment of full diplomatic relations between the State of Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain are historic achievements, and encourage other Arab countries to follow suit, ignoring the issue of justice for Palestinians.
The normalization of relations with Arab countries gives Israel a veneer of legitimacy while giving them access to US-made weapons – and giving the US and Israel access to Arab money.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was jubilant: “Everyone can see the fruits of this peace accord. The UAE committed to bringing massive investments to Israel, hundreds of millions of shekels. It’s already happening and it will happen even more..”
More treaties are expected, bought and paid for by the US.
H.Res.138, H.Res.258, and S.Res.121also celebrate improving Arab-Israel relations.
MISCELLANEOUS PRO ISRAEL LEGISLATION
H.R.3723 addresses the issue of aiding drought-stricken areas of the US, and prioritizes projects that have worked with international partners “such as the state of Israel.”
There is great irony in the idea of Israeli experts assisting with water projects in the US: is simple: Israel provides plenteous water to its Jewish residents for free (including the 600,000 that live illegally on Palestinian land), but is perpetrating a water catastrophe in the Palestinian territories – refusing to provide water to some areas, selling it at exorbitant prices to others. In Gaza, water is “scarce and mostly unfit for human use.”
In several pieces of legislation – including H.Res.326, H.Res. 518, S.Res.234, and S.567 – Congress attempts to impose decisions about land in Middle East countries (some of the decisions contravene international law).
H.R.5595, S.Res.120, H.R.336, H.Res.314, H.Res.348, and H.Res.246 seek to extinguish the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement, which puts nonviolent pressure on Israel to obey international law. BDS patterns itself after the movement that aided in ending apartheid in South Africa, and “upholds the simple principle that Palestinians are entitled to the same rights as the rest of humanity.” Much has been written about BDS (for example, read this and this).
S.Res.745 and H.Res.1173 honor “the life, legacy, and example of former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on the 25th anniversary of his death” – a man whose life’s work has been whitewashed to erase atrocities against the Palestinian people.
H.R.7900 addresses the issue of organ donation in the US, and gives a shout-out to Israel for its “exemplary” program – although Spain’s is considered the best in the world, and Israel made improvements only to reform its reputation as a favorite destination for illegal organ trafficking.
S.3409 and H.R.6392, S.919, H.R.914, H.R.336, H.Res.12, S.Res.153, and H.Res.310 propose various other perks for Israel.
LEGISLATION THAT APPEARS TO BE PRO-PALESTINE, BUT ISN’T
S.Res.171 seeks to restore economic aid to the Palestinians without bringing an end to the programs that caused Palestinians to be in need of aid – thus enabling Israel to continue unchecked in its oppression.
H.R.3104 promotes “joint economic development and finance ventures between Palestinian entrepreneurs and companies and those in the US and Israel.” Rep. Chris Coons, one of the bill’s sponsors, explained, “job creation is the best way to turn people away from violence” – implying that unarmed Palestinians are the violent party, and that employment – not freedom or self-determination – is the solution.
PALESTINIAN RIGHTS RECOGNIZED
H.R.8050 would prohibit the US government from recognizing Israel’s claim of sovereignty over parts of the West Bank, or assisting Israel with those efforts – because it violates international law. The international community, many Israelis, and many staunch Israel partisans, agree.
H.R.2407 seeks to protect Palestinian children from incarceration and torture by Israel using US aid money. It seeks not to end the practice, but only American complicity in it. (Read more about the bill here.) Although its language is mild and pro-child, the bill has been attacked aggressively by pro-Israel groups.
H.Res.496, the only pro-boycott bill, supports the right of Americans to take part in a political practice long used by Americans across the political spectrum. The bill does not mention Israel or Palestine – yet it has been denounced as “anti-Semitic.”
If Americans Knew has checked every legislator’s voting record on every Israel-related bill since January 2019, and reported them for your information. We hope you will make your voice heard in this election – and throughout the next congressional session – to bring accountability to our government vis-a-vis Israel, and to Israel vis-a-vis Palestine.
To view all the bills and Senators’/challengers’ record see this:
Kathryn Shihadah is staff writer for If Americans Knew. She also writes for MintPress News and blogs at Palestine Home.


renegadetribune--2020-11-01--Songbird – Michael Bay Movie About Horrifying 4th Year of COVID Lockdown

Is this another case of “ predictive programming ” showing us exactly where we are headed ?
Something tells me @ @ @ @ @ ) ) ) is not trying to really warn us about government overreach .

Is this another case of "predictive programming" showing us exactly where we are headed? Something tells me mask-promoting (((Hollywood))) is not trying to really warn us about government overreach.


renegadetribune--2020-11-02--Sightseeing: A Postcard from Treblinka

Sightseeing: A Postcard from Treblinka

The following is a true account of my personal visit to the camp .
Certain names and dates have been changed to protect privacy .
All photos are my own .
Mid-summer , Warsaw .
Partly sunny , mild—a nice day to visit a death camp .
I had just finished with an academic conference in the suburbs of Warsaw , and had one free day ( a Tuesday ) before moving on to my next European engagement .
This was very fortunate , as I knew that the Treblinka concentration camp was only some 100 km away , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chance to see it in person .
My local Polish contacts were supportive , if slightly puzzled why an American professor of humanities would bother visiting a place “ with nothing there to see.
” But I insisted , and so they complied .
A Polish colleague , Lech , agreed to travel with me .
He had no car , so we booked a taxi—reasonably priced , considering the distance—and by 9:30 am we were on our way to Treblinka .
We would not be arriving as mere tourists .
Another colleague @ @ @ @ @ @ @ museum director Edward Kopowka .
He agreed to meet with us , show us the small museum , and then walk the camp grounds with us for two full hours .
Good luck for us , though perhaps not for him .
We made good time , arriving in Malkinia before 10:30 am , and only some 10 km from the camp .
But then a problem : the bridge over the Bug River was out of service .
We would have to go down to the next crossing at Leg Nurski , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work our way back to the camp .
This little detour threw our Warsaw-based cabbie for a loop , and with signage virtually nonexistent , I knew we were in a bit of a fix .
So we crossed the river , worked our way down to Kosow Lacki , stopped two or three times for directions , drove up past Wolka Okraglik , and on to the entrance of the camp—after 45 extra minutes .
But we were there .
We drove right in—no gate , no guard , no entrance fee—and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lot , a relief ; no Auschwitz-style Disneyland here .
Lech and I walked over to the small museum ( Photo 1 ) .
Edward was in his office , ready to see us .
He was a clean-cut fellow , probably in his late 40s , and seemed happy to have us .
Lech introduced us ( in Polish ) , and I immediately learned that Edward “ spoke no English.
” Lech would have to translate back and forth—a bit of an inconvenience , I thought , and strange for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with many visitors .
But here I was the foreigner , so I couldn ’ t much complain .
Inside the museum we viewed a large wall map , showing both the labor portion of the camp ( Treblinka I ) , and the “ extermination ” zone , Treblinka II—see Photo 2 .
We were presently located at the far right , near the parking “ P ” , with the museum marked “ M ” .
Edward then introduced to us—with Lech patiently translating—a large scale model of the extermination camp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the standard extermination process : the arriving train cars , the separation by sexes , the “ tube ” pathway to the gas chambers , and then the gassing itself—with diesel engine exhaust .
Not being your typical ignorant tourist , I asked if diesel exhaust had enough carbon monoxide to efficiently kill masses of people .
Edward ’ s answer : the Germans used “ dirty fuel ” !
This was a new one for me ; I am unaware of any witness or perpetrator describing the deliberate use of contaminated diesel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , nor do I know if it would even work .
But it was an interesting response .
Evidently he knew that ordinary diesel exhaust can not kill masses of people , so the story had to be modified .
But who am I to challenge the director of the Treblinka museum himself ?
Edward then explained that a total of 912,000 people were killed over the brief , 11-month lifetime of the camp .
In fact this is precisely the figure offered by Manfred Burba in his 1995 German book , Treblinka @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other “ expert ” estimates—including van Pelt ’ s 750,000 , Hilberg ’ s 800,000 , Arad ’ s 870,000 , or Benz ’ s 974,000—he did not say .
Of the 912,000 , the first 700,000 were initially buried in mass graves , he said , and then later exhumed for cremation on open-air pyres—the usual story , but rife with problems .
He pointedly did not discuss the time frame , so I asked ( knowing already ) if all 700,000 were buried first , prior to exhumation .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ So I asked : where exactly were these 700,000 bodies buried ?
He pointed to a few areas marked “ mass grave ” on the model .
And how much space did they require ?
A lot , he said .
How deep were the graves ?
, I asked .
Eight meters—some 26 feet , a very impressive hole .
Isn ’ t there a ground water problem here , I asked , being a flat landscape so close to the Bug river ?
Not a concern , Edward replied ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deep .
No problems here !
We then proceeded to walk to the extermination camp .
One quickly notices that many things about the camp are “ symbolic ” : symbolic camp entrance ( Photo 4 ) , symbolic fence ( Photo 5 ) , symbolic railroad tracks ( Photo 6 ) .
Necessary , Edward says , because the “ Nazis ” obliterated every trace of the original camp .
How convenient , I thought to myself .
Along the way we passed a large map of the camp area ( Photo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resemblance to the present memorial layout , and it was nearly impossible to locate the various “ symbolic ” markers that we had seen .
But perhaps it was just as well—fewer difficult questions to answer this way .
Soon enough we arrived at the pathway ( the symbolic “ tube ” ) that led to the famous central monument : a toadstool-like monolith located at the very spot of the alleged gas chambers ( Photo 8 ) .
Here we were , at the heart of Treblinka , the site of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Holocaust : of the 912,000 victims , 837,000 were killed in just six months of 1942 , according to the camp ’ s ( and Burba ’ s ) “ official ” tally .
( The remaining 75,000 died in 1943 . )
This works out to nearly 140,000 per month , 35,000 per week , or 5,000 per day , every day , rain or shine , for six months .
Not even Auschwitz during the alleged Hungarian massacre could match this rate .
Surprisingly , gassing that many people per day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ view .
Treblinka had , for most of its existence , 10 chambers with a combined capacity of nearly 40,000 gassings per day ; 5,000 would have been a walk in the park .
Corpse disposal , on the other hand , would have been a nightmare .
Burying the first 700,000 victims would have required astoundingly huge graves .
If we accept Arad ’ s claim of four such graves , each would have had to be something like 15 x 120 meters in area , and 8 meters deep ( as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those bodies .
Combined , this is an area equivalent to 1.4 times as large as a professional American football field , and 26 feet deep .
( And where did they put all that dirt , by the way ? )
Upon dumping the bodies for nine months , the Germans then , allegedly , covered the whole mess up—just in time to change their minds and decide to burn them all .
So they uncovered the graves , dredged up 700,000 rotting , decaying corpses , and dragged them over to…a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Down to pure ash , down to nothing .
In the open air .
Using wood logs .
I asked Edward where this miracle happened .
He walked us over to the “ symbolic ” pit where the Germans had constructed grills of elevated railway rails , on which they could stack the corpses—see Photos 9 and 10 .
Wood was placed underneath , ignited , and the bodies all but vaporized .
And not only did they have the 700,000 exhumed corpses , but they also had to contend with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bodies that were still being gassed—at a rate of 5,000 per day .
All 912,000 bodies , reduced to ash , in the very spot we were standing .
And they did this in just 16 weeks , according to the experts—more than 8,000 per day , every day .
Those Germans were brilliant indeed , and efficient .
Where is the ash ?
, I asked .
It ’ s still in the ground , said Edward .
He reached down , scraped around in the dirt with his hand , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He handed me 5 or 6 bits of something that certainly looked like ash : two were black ( wood ash ? )
, one was grey , and two white—bone fragments , perhaps ?
I was quite impressed : here in my hand were the likely remains of actual Treblinka victims .
I stuffed the bits of ash in my pocket .
I have them still .
During our discussion the question of excavations arose .
On the traditional view , the ash was reburied in the graves that held the bodies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ literally tons of it remaining .
But as we know , there have been no attempts to unearth evidence of mass graves , or to measure or quantify ashes or human remains—not one single attempt , in nearly 70 years .
It is almost as if the powers that be did not want to confirm the truth .
Perhaps they suspected , in the back of their minds , that the conventional story line would not hold up .
So , I was quite surprised to hear that a team from Birmingham University @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a non-invasive study of the mass graves , using a ground-penetrating radar .
I made a note to myself to follow the progress of this very interesting development .
Our time about up , we walked on back to the museum .
Along the way we stopped at a little gift-shop kiosk and purchased two small books : a photo album titled Treblinka : The Stones Are Silent ( 2007 ) and a historical overview , Treblinka II – The Death Camp ( 2007 ) .
The latter reiterated that “ around 900,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it included a surprising statistic : “ one third of the deportees were dead or on the verge of death when they reached [ the camp ] ” ( p. 9 ) .
This was a shock : something like 200,000 or 250,000 of the Treblinka victims were dead on arrival ?
I am unaware of this estimate in any conventional academic work ; it would significantly alter the whole story .
The book also mentions the 10 gas chambers , each of 16 square meters in area , which could collectively gas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time ” ( p. 13 ) .
So : 500 victims per room , which works out to 31 persons per square meter of area .
Evidently the authors count on the reader being incapable of basic math—otherwise they wouldn ’ t put forth this obvious nonsense .
Such was my day in Treblinka .
Back in the parking lot , our cabbie was waiting—arising from a little nap .
His time might have been better spent .
Heading back to Warsaw we took “ the direct route , ” meaning , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , two hungry hours later , we arrived back at our hotel .
Quite a day .
I wouldn ’ t have missed it for the world .
: For a long time after my visit , I heard nothing at all about any Birmingham study of the camp using ground-penetrating radar .
I was disappointed , but not surprised .
Then to my astonishment , just one week ago , came a blazing headline in the British paper The Daily Mail : “ British archaeologist destroys Holocaust deniers ’ argument with mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ January 2012 ) .
The short article reads , in part : A British forensic archaeologist has unearthed fresh evidence to prove the existence of mass graves at the “ Nazi ” death camp Treblinka—scuppering the claims of Holocaust deniers who say it was merely a transit camp .
… Forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls has now undertaken the first coordinated scientific attempt to locate the graves .
Ms. Colls is quoted as follows : “ I ’ ve identified a number of buried pits using geophysical techniques .
These are considerable in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in particular is 26 by 17 meters.
” This is the full extent of the details that we are offered—a very strong sign that Ms. Colls did not , in fact , “ destroy ” the revisionists ’ arguments .
The presumably largest grave is 26 by 17 meters , or 442 square meters in area .
Recall above where I noted that the orthodox story requires a total grave area of roughly 7200 square meters .
So Ms. Colls ’ s one large grave is about 6 % of the necessary area @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a number ” of graves , but unless this was something like 30 or 40 , she is far short of the mark .
More likely , of course , the “ number ” was quite small , or we would surely have been given specifics .
I would further add that , on the revisionist thesis , many thousands of people did indeed die in the camp , of various causes .
A high-volume transit camp would have received thousands of incoming dead ( recall the “ one third ” statistic above @ @ @ @ @ @ @ died of disease and , yes , execution ( likely by bullet ) at the camp .
So it is fully expected that mass graves exist in the camp .
But the anticipated number of victims is much smaller—perhaps 10 % of those claimed .
Thus we might expect to see a total grave volume of around 10,000 to 12,000 cubic meters , rather than the 120,000 required by the conventional account .
So what grave volume did Ms. Colls find ?
BBC Radio 4 ran a 30-minute exclusive story on this event @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several times , but offered very few additional details .
She confirmed that a “ number ” of graves were found , with the largest as mentioned above .
But of course , we also need to know how deep they are .
The newspaper article quoted her as saying they were “ very deep.
” But it turns out that her high-tech ground-scanning system can not record the depth !
All she knows is that the graves are “ at least 4 meters deep ” —evidently the scanning limit of her system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of either blinding incompetence , or willful neglect .
Any serious attempt to understand the graves would have obviously recorded their depth , at least to the full 8 meters claimed by Edward Kopowka .
As it is , and for all she knows , the graves may indeed be no more than 4 meters deep—in which case , her large “ 26 x 17 ” grave is a mere 3 % of the needed size .
Colls added one further fact on the radio program : the “ main area ” for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chambers , showed evidence of “ five graves in a row.
” And all five , presumably , are significantly smaller than her largest .
This again suggests that she has found only a small fraction of the necessary grave area .
The conventional story , and the 700,000 buried corpses , may well have been fatally undermined by this latest discovery .
But we won ’ t know until we see the details of her report—if they ever reach the light of day .
Lacking the details , it ’ s hard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signs point in one direction .
They imply that , as at Belzec , ground surveys provide far more support for the revisionist thesis than the traditional one .
Things are looking up ; the truth is at hand .

A Postcard from Treblinka
By Thomas Dalton Published: 2012-04-01
The following is a true account of my personal visit to the camp. Certain names and dates have been changed to protect privacy. All photos are my own.
Mid-summer, Warsaw. Partly sunny, mild—a nice day to visit a death camp. I had just finished with an academic conference in the suburbs of Warsaw, and had one free day (a Tuesday) before moving on to my next European engagement. This was very fortunate, as I knew that the Treblinka concentration camp was only some 100 km away, and I was very much hoping for a chance to see it in person. My local Polish contacts were supportive, if slightly puzzled why an American professor of humanities would bother visiting a place “with nothing there to see.” But I insisted, and so they complied. A Polish colleague, Lech, agreed to travel with me. He had no car, so we booked a taxi—reasonably priced, considering the distance—and by 9:30 am we were on our way to Treblinka.
We would not be arriving as mere tourists. Another colleague previously contacted the camp and spoke with museum director Edward Kopowka. He agreed to meet with us, show us the small museum, and then walk the camp grounds with us for two full hours. Good luck for us, though perhaps not for him.
We made good time, arriving in Malkinia before 10:30 am, and only some 10 km from the camp. But then a problem: the bridge over the Bug River was out of service. We would have to go down to the next crossing at Leg Nurski, about 20 km away, and then work our way back to the camp. This little detour threw our Warsaw-based cabbie for a loop, and with signage virtually nonexistent, I knew we were in a bit of a fix. So we crossed the river, worked our way down to Kosow Lacki, stopped two or three times for directions, drove up past Wolka Okraglik, and on to the entrance of the camp—after 45 extra minutes. But we were there. We drove right in—no gate, no guard, no entrance fee—and parked. Only two other cars in the lot, a relief; no Auschwitz-style Disneyland here.
Lech and I walked over to the small museum (Photo 1). Edward was in his office, ready to see us. He was a clean-cut fellow, probably in his late 40s, and seemed happy to have us. Lech introduced us (in Polish), and I immediately learned that Edward “spoke no English.” Lech would have to translate back and forth—a bit of an inconvenience, I thought, and strange for someone whose job it is to interact with many visitors. But here I was the foreigner, so I couldn’t much complain.
Photo 1: Treblinka museum.
Inside the museum we viewed a large wall map, showing both the labor portion of the camp (Treblinka I), and the “extermination” zone, Treblinka II—see Photo 2. We were presently located at the far right, near the parking “P”, with the museum marked “M”.
Photo 2: Camp layout.
Edward then introduced to us—with Lech patiently translating—a large scale model of the extermination camp (Photo 3). Edward explained the standard extermination process: the arriving train cars, the separation by sexes, the “tube” pathway to the gas chambers, and then the gassing itself—with diesel engine exhaust. Not being your typical ignorant tourist, I asked if diesel exhaust had enough carbon monoxide to efficiently kill masses of people. Edward’s answer: the Germans used “dirty fuel”! This was a new one for me; I am unaware of any witness or perpetrator describing the deliberate use of contaminated diesel fuel in order to increase CO content, nor do I know if it would even work. But it was an interesting response. Evidently he knew that ordinary diesel exhaust cannot kill masses of people, so the story had to be modified. But who am I to challenge the director of the Treblinka museum himself?
Photo 3: Scale model of extermination camp.
Edward then explained that a total of 912,000 people were killed over the brief, 11-month lifetime of the camp. In fact this is precisely the figure offered by Manfred Burba in his 1995 German book, Treblinka. Why Edward preferred this number over the other “expert” estimates—including van Pelt’s 750,000, Hilberg’s 800,000, Arad’s 870,000, or Benz’s 974,000—he did not say.
Of the 912,000, the first 700,000 were initially buried in mass graves, he said, and then later exhumed for cremation on open-air pyres—the usual story, but rife with problems. He pointedly did not discuss the time frame, so I asked (knowing already) if all 700,000 were buried first, prior to exhumation. He hesitated, but finally answered ‘yes.’ So I asked: where exactly were these 700,000 bodies buried? He pointed to a few areas marked “mass grave” on the model. And how much space did they require? A lot, he said. How deep were the graves?, I asked. Eight meters—some 26 feet, a very impressive hole. Isn’t there a ground water problem here, I asked, being a flat landscape so close to the Bug river? Not a concern, Edward replied; the water table is some 10 meters deep. No problems here!
We then proceeded to walk to the extermination camp. One quickly notices that many things about the camp are “symbolic”: symbolic camp entrance (Photo 4), symbolic fence (Photo 5), symbolic railroad tracks (Photo 6). Necessary, Edward says, because the “Nazis” obliterated every trace of the original camp. How convenient, I thought to myself.
Photo 4: Symbolic camp entrance.
Photo 5: Symbolic camp fence.
Photo 6: Symbolic railroad tracks.
Along the way we passed a large map of the camp area (Photo 7). Unfortunately it bore little resemblance to the present memorial layout, and it was nearly impossible to locate the various “symbolic” markers that we had seen. But perhaps it was just as well—fewer difficult questions to answer this way.
Photo 7: Camp layout.
Soon enough we arrived at the pathway (the symbolic “tube”) that led to the famous central monument: a toadstool-like monolith located at the very spot of the alleged gas chambers (Photo 8). Here we were, at the heart of Treblinka, the site of the most horrendous kill rate of the entire Holocaust: of the 912,000 victims, 837,000 were killed in just six months of 1942, according to the camp’s (and Burba’s) “official” tally. (The remaining 75,000 died in 1943.) This works out to nearly 140,000 per month, 35,000 per week, or 5,000 per day, every day, rain or shine, for six months. Not even Auschwitz during the alleged Hungarian massacre could match this rate.
Photo 8: Central monument, marking the gas chambers.
Surprisingly, gassing that many people per day was no problem, on the traditional view. Treblinka had, for most of its existence, 10 chambers with a combined capacity of nearly 40,000 gassings per day; 5,000 would have been a walk in the park. Corpse disposal, on the other hand, would have been a nightmare. Burying the first 700,000 victims would have required astoundingly huge graves. If we accept Arad’s claim of four such graves, each would have had to be something like 15 x 120 meters in area, and 8 meters deep (as Edward claimed), to hold all those bodies. Combined, this is an area equivalent to 1.4 times as large as a professional American football field, and 26 feet deep. (And where did they put all that dirt, by the way?) Upon dumping the bodies for nine months, the Germans then, allegedly, covered the whole mess up—just in time to change their minds and decide to burn them all.
So they uncovered the graves, dredged up 700,000 rotting, decaying corpses, and dragged them over to…a fire pit. To burn them all. Down to pure ash, down to nothing. In the open air. Using wood logs. I asked Edward where this miracle happened. He walked us over to the “symbolic” pit where the Germans had constructed grills of elevated railway rails, on which they could stack the corpses—see Photos 9 and 10. Wood was placed underneath, ignited, and the bodies all but vaporized. And not only did they have the 700,000 exhumed corpses, but they also had to contend with the ongoing supply of 212,000 “fresh” bodies that were still being gassed—at a rate of 5,000 per day. All 912,000 bodies, reduced to ash, in the very spot we were standing. And they did this in just 16 weeks, according to the experts—more than 8,000 per day, every day. Those Germans were brilliant indeed, and efficient.
Photo 9: Symbolic cremation pit.
Photo 10: Edward Kopowka, at the ash pit.
Where is the ash?, I asked. It’s still in the ground, said Edward. He reached down, scraped around in the dirt with his hand, and said, “Here is some.” He handed me 5 or 6 bits of something that certainly looked like ash: two were black (wood ash?), one was grey, and two white—bone fragments, perhaps? I was quite impressed: here in my hand were the likely remains of actual Treblinka victims. I stuffed the bits of ash in my pocket. I have them still.
During our discussion the question of excavations arose. On the traditional view, the ash was reburied in the graves that held the bodies; even today, there would be literally tons of it remaining. But as we know, there have been no attempts to unearth evidence of mass graves, or to measure or quantify ashes or human remains—not one single attempt, in nearly 70 years. It is almost as if the powers that be did not want to confirm the truth. Perhaps they suspected, in the back of their minds, that the conventional story line would not hold up. So, I was quite surprised to hear that a team from Birmingham University (UK) was preparing to conduct a non-invasive study of the mass graves, using a ground-penetrating radar. I made a note to myself to follow the progress of this very interesting development.
Our time about up, we walked on back to the museum. Along the way we stopped at a little gift-shop kiosk and purchased two small books: a photo album titled Treblinka: The Stones Are Silent (2007) and a historical overview, Treblinka II – The Death Camp (2007). The latter reiterated that “around 900,000” jews were killed there, but it included a surprising statistic: “one third of the deportees were dead or on the verge of death when they reached [the camp]” (p. 9). This was a shock: something like 200,000 or 250,000 of the Treblinka victims were dead on arrival? I am unaware of this estimate in any conventional academic work; it would significantly alter the whole story.
The book also mentions the 10 gas chambers, each of 16 square meters in area, which could collectively gas “up to 5000 victims at a time” (p. 13). So: 500 victims per room, which works out to 31 persons per square meter of area. Evidently the authors count on the reader being incapable of basic math—otherwise they wouldn’t put forth this obvious nonsense.
Such was my day in Treblinka. Back in the parking lot, our cabbie was waiting—arising from a little nap. His time might have been better spent. Heading back to Warsaw we took “the direct route,” meaning, we got lost three more times. Finally, two hungry hours later, we arrived back at our hotel. Quite a day. I wouldn’t have missed it for the world.
Postscript : For a long time after my visit, I heard nothing at all about any Birmingham study of the camp using ground-penetrating radar. I was disappointed, but not surprised. Then to my astonishment, just one week ago, came a blazing headline in the British paper The Daily Mail: “British archaeologist destroys Holocaust deniers’ argument with mass grave find at Treblinka” (18 January 2012). The short article reads, in part:
A British forensic archaeologist has unearthed fresh evidence to prove the existence of mass graves at the “Nazi” death camp Treblinka—scuppering the claims of Holocaust deniers who say it was merely a transit camp. … Forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls has now undertaken the first coordinated scientific attempt to locate the graves.
Ms. Colls is quoted as follows: “I’ve identified a number of buried pits using geophysical techniques. These are considerable in size, and very deep, one in particular is 26 by 17 meters.” This is the full extent of the details that we are offered—a very strong sign that Ms. Colls did not, in fact, “destroy” the revisionists’ arguments. The presumably largest grave is 26 by 17 meters, or 442 square meters in area. Recall above where I noted that the orthodox story requires a total grave area of roughly 7200 square meters. So Ms. Colls’s one large grave is about 6% of the necessary area. She claims to have found “a number” of graves, but unless this was something like 30 or 40, she is far short of the mark. More likely, of course, the “number” was quite small, or we would surely have been given specifics.
I would further add that, on the revisionist thesis, many thousands of people did indeed die in the camp, of various causes. A high-volume transit camp would have received thousands of incoming dead (recall the “one third” statistic above), and many more would have died of disease and, yes, execution (likely by bullet) at the camp. So it is fully expected that mass graves exist in the camp. But the anticipated number of victims is much smaller—perhaps 10% of those claimed. Thus we might expect to see a total grave volume of around 10,000 to 12,000 cubic meters, rather than the 120,000 required by the conventional account.
So what grave volume did Ms. Colls find? BBC Radio 4 ran a 30-minute exclusive story on this event, on January 23. She spoke several times, but offered very few additional details. She confirmed that a “number” of graves were found, with the largest as mentioned above. But of course, we also need to know how deep they are. The newspaper article quoted her as saying they were “very deep.” But it turns out that her high-tech ground-scanning system cannot record the depth! All she knows is that the graves are “at least 4 meters deep”—evidently the scanning limit of her system. Unbelievable. This is a case of either blinding incompetence, or willful neglect. Any serious attempt to understand the graves would have obviously recorded their depth, at least to the full 8 meters claimed by Edward Kopowka. As it is, and for all she knows, the graves may indeed be no more than 4 meters deep—in which case, her large “26 x 17” grave is a mere 3% of the needed size.
Colls added one further fact on the radio program: the “main area” for graves, right behind the presumed gas chambers, showed evidence of “five graves in a row.” And all five, presumably, are significantly smaller than her largest. This again suggests that she has found only a small fraction of the necessary grave area. The conventional story, and the 700,000 buried corpses, may well have been fatally undermined by this latest discovery. But we won’t know until we see the details of her report—if they ever reach the light of day.
Lacking the details, it’s hard to draw firm conclusions. But all signs point in one direction. They imply that, as at Belzec, ground surveys provide far more support for the revisionist thesis than the traditional one. Things are looking up; the truth is at hand.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


Black LIES Matter

There is no one in the whole entire mass media who is willing to speak about the truth regarding black @ @ @ @

People take part in a Black Lives Matter protest in Trafalgar Square, London, following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, US, this week which has seen a police officer charged with third-degree murder. PA Photo. Picture date: Sunday May 31, 2020. See PA story PROTEST BlackLivesMatter. Photo credit should read: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire