renegadetribune--2020-04-15--The Best of Giuseppe Verdi

The Best of Giuseppe Verdi

Giuseppe Verdi was born in Italy in 1813 , prior to Italian unification .
Verdi produced many successful operas , @ @ @ @ @ and Aida , and became known for his skill in creating melody and his profound @ @ @ @ @ Additionally , his rejection of the traditional Italian opera for integrated scenes and unified acts @ @ @ @ @ died on January 27 , 1901 , in Milan , Italy .
[ Read the @ @ @ @

Giuseppe Verdi was born in Italy in 1813, prior to Italian unification. Verdi produced many successful operas, including La Traviata, Falstaff and Aida, and became known for his skill in creating melody and his profound use of theatrical effect. Additionally, his rejection of the traditional Italian opera for integrated scenes and unified acts earned him fame. Verdi died on January 27, 1901, in Milan, Italy. [Read the rest at Biography.com]
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-04-15--Inside the Gas Chambers: The Extermination of Mainstream Holocaust Historiography

In 2008 an international meeting of historians took place at Oranienburg , a northern suburb of Berlin , Germany .
Three years later , the papers presented there were published as a collection by Günter Morsch and Bertrand Perz ( and assisted by Astrid Ley ) under the title Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch Giftgas ( New Studies on the National Socialist Mass Killings by Poison Gas ) .
In his foreword , Thomas Krüger describes the contents and the structure of this book with the following words ( p. XII ) : “ This anthology summarizes new findings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the topic ‘ Mass murder by means of poison gas.
’ It describes the aims and structures of revisionist propaganda and presents suggestions and concepts for the treatment of revisionist denial.
” As early as 1983 , an anthology with the title Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas .
Eine Dokumentation had appeared , claiming to refute revisionism by way of scientific historical methods .
Still , in the introduction to the book being discussed here , Morsch and Perz are forced to admit that “ questions and denials did not decrease after the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( p. XV ) and that a new effort has thus become necessary .
The new work has six parts : • None “ Technical and pharmacological aspects and the significance of remainders.
” • None “ Poison gas as a means of genocide in gas vans and extermination camps.
” • None “ Murder by gas in the concentration camps located in the ‘ Altreich ’ at Mauthausen , Stutthof und Natzweiler.
” The significance of each contribution varies greatly .
Some of them are so unimportant and have so little to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meeting that they are hardly worth being discussed in any detail .
In the following analysis of the book I shall maintain the sequence in which the individual papers appear in the book .
From time to time , however , I will allow myself to assess as a group those articles which deal with the same topic .
For that reason , a discussion of the articles attacking revisionism , devoid of substance as they are , appears only towards the end of this present analysis .
The first article deserving attention @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entitled “ The lethal gases ” ( “ Die todbringenden Gase ” ; pp .
23-49 ) .
It deals with the various gases allegedly used for killing people in the National Socialist era .
The first three are well-known from Holocaust literature : Carbon monoxide which , as we are told , was allegedly applied in the euthanasia centers during the so-called “ Aktion 14f13 , ” in an experimental gas vans of “ Sonderkommando Lange , ” as well as in the Majdanek concentration camp .
Engine exhaust gases , said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ Aktion Reinhardt ” ( Bełżec , Chełmno , Sobibór , Treblinka ) .
Zyklon B , claimed to have been used for killing people at Auschwitz , Majdanek , Mauthausen , Stutthof and Ravensbrück ( as well as , maybe , Dachau ) .
No less than seven contributions are devoted to euthanasia centers .
They vary in significance .
I shall discuss them here as a group .
I should stress the point that the historical reality of the euthanasia of mental patients is not in doubt .
Still , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the following questions : • None What items of proof exist for the assertion that the euthanasia centers were equipped with homicidal gas chambers employing carbon monoxide ?
• None What items of proof permit the assertion that carbon monoxide in steel cylinders was used in the euthanasia centers ?
• None What items of proof allow establishing the Ludwigshafen branch of I.G .
Farben as the supplier of carbon monoxide in steel bottles to the euthanasia centers ?
• None In what manner did carbon monoxide become the selected killing instrument ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not irrelevant question concerns the crematorium furnaces allegedly installed at the euthanasia centers .
Is material or documentary evidence available for their existence ?
If so , which firms were the manufacturers ?
What type of fuel was used ?
How did they operate and what technical characteristics did they have ?
Most important however : what was their capacity ?
This latter question is relevant in connection with the number of persons killed , said to have exceeded 100 per day at some centers over a longer period of time ( p. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article “ Gas vans , from euthanasia to genocide ” ( “ Gaswagen .
Von der Euthanasie zum Genozid ” ; pp .
153-164 ) is nothing but a pale rehashing of his earlier study “ The development of the gas vans and the murder of the jews ” mentioned above ( “ Die Entwicklung der Gaswagen beim Mord an den juden ” ) , which I have already analyzed critically in an earlier book .
Even more than the first article , this one shows a blatant lack of critical judgment .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Aktion Reinhardt ” Let us now turn to the relationship between the euthanasia centers and the alleged extermination camps of “ Aktion Reinhardt.
” This topic is dealt with by Patricia Heberer in her article “ From “ Aktion TA ” to the mass murder of the “ European ” jews .
The transfer of the killer staff ” ( “ Von der ‘ Aktion T4 ’ zum Massenmord an den “ europäischen ” juden.
’ Der Transfer des Tötungspersonals ” ; pp .
165-175 ) .
Two topics dominate here : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ centers to the eastern camps of Bełżec , Treblinka and Majdanek , and the alleged relationship between the mysterious gas chambers at these centers and those of the three camps .
This second point is what mainly concerns us here .
Patricia Heberer believes that euthanasia had served “ in many ways as a technical model for the ‘ final solution , ’ ” whose planners had “ referred to the experience and the methods of ‘ Aktion T4 ’ ( p. 171 ) .
Patricia Heberer concludes that the men of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Poland with a thorough knowledge of the gassing procedure and the corpse incineration process ( p. 175 ) .
This thesis is a little adventurous .
We have heard that in the euthanasia centers crematoria were allegedly used for this purpose , and so one wonders about the experience the men of “ Aktion T4 ” may have had when it came to open-air incinerations as allegedly employed in the Bełżec , Sobibór and Treblinka camps .
What is much more important , however , is the question of the gas chambers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not supported by the sources , as the descriptions of witnesses relating to the gas chambers for euthanasia centers are radically different from the chambers allegedly used in the “ eastern extermination camps.
” In his article titled “ Mass killings through poison gas at the Chełmno camp ” ( “ Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Vernichtungslager Chełmno ” ; pp .
176-184 ) Peter Klein deals with the Chełmno camp ( German name : Kulmhof ) .
In line with the usual practice of orthodox Holocaust historiography , he begins his account @ @ @ @ @ @ @ July 1941 by SS-Sturmbannführer Rolf-Heinz Höppner , Head of the Security Service ’ s central district of Posen , and addressed to SS-Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann .
The letter reads i.a .
: “ All the Warthegau jews will be assembled in a camp for 300,000 jews which will be built in the form of barracks as close as possible to the railway line carrying coal and which contains equipment for industrial workers , tailors , cobblers and so on [ … ] This winter there is a danger that not all jews can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seriously consider whether the most humane solution is not to eliminate the jews by some substance with rapid effect insofar as they are unfit to work.
” Klein has to admit , however , that “ there is no written evidence for the conclusion that during this conversation the ‘ jewish question ’ too was on the agenda ” ( p. 177 ) .
This is a blatant understatement , for there are no written documents on the subject of this meeting .
The only evidence for the meeting to have taken place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ showing Hitler in conversation with Greiser ( footnote 4 on p. 177 ) !
It is truly breathtaking to what extent Klein loads this snapshot with interpretations .
Dieter Pohl ’ s article “ Mass killings with poison gas within the framework of ‘ Aktion Reinhardt ’ ” ( “ Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Rahmen der ‘ Aktion Reinhardt ’ ” ; pp .
185-196 ) is a real disappointment .
The author pretends to present an overview of the state of the art of Holocaust research on the camps at Bełżec , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a far cry from fulfilling his promise , as he limited himself to rehashing hackneyed assertions .
Early into his explanations , Dieter Pohl writes that the background of the “ mass murder ” has not been fully elucidated to this date ( “ nicht völlig durchleuchtet , ” p. 185 ) .
After summarizing very briefly the NS policy towards the jews in the General Government – the project of a “ Judenreservat ” ( jewish reservation ) in the District of Lublin , the plans for the removal of the jews @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as the role of the ghettos as transit stations for this expulsion – he comes up , as if by magic , with an alleged plan for the physical elimination of the jews ( p. 186 ) .
“ At roughly the same time , in September 1941 , the National Socialist leadership decided to carry out systematic mass murders also outside of the occupied Soviet territories , e.g .
in the Warthegau , the Polish part of the Province of Posen , but also in Serbia .
[ … ] It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ October 1941 , SS-Chief Heinrich Himmler ordered the SS and Police Leader in the District of Lublin , Odilo Globocnik , to organize such a murder action within the GG [ General Government ] .
” Regarding the hypothesized decision of a complete eradication of the jews , orthodox Holocaust historiography has begun in recent years to move away from a “ Führer order , ” and instead assumes a mere “ decision ” by Hitler , allegedly taken on 12 December 1941 .
The desperate attempts by orthodox Holocaust historians to finally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ date for the decision to “ eradicate the jews ” only continue to complicate the issue still further .
The anthology under discussion here contains two articles by Robert J. van Pelt : “ Auschwitz ” ( p. 196-218 ) and “ For want of a nail , or reflections on how history must not be rewritten ” ( “ Weil ein Nagel fehlte , oder Überlegungen , wie die Geschichte nicht umgeschrieben werden darf ” ; pp .
343- 354 ) .
It seems logical to discuss both contributions together .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We are dealing here with a polemic rather than a serious paper , which is revealed by its frequent use of inflammatory words ( several times van Pelt even refers to Clausewitz ! )
.
While the author apologizes for his “ military metaphors , ” he still considers that “ the fight against the denial of the Holocaust ” feels “ like a war ” and “ is conceived as a defensive battle ” ( p. 344 ) .
This introduction makes the reader believe that he witnesses a fight to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” but anyone reading the article carefully gets the impression of not observing a “ war , ” or at least a “ battle , ” but rather merely a desperate rear-guard skirmish .
The author ends his contribution by a somewhat shameless self-adulation .
• The Gas Chambers of the Majdanek Camp Tomasz Kranz , the director of the Majdanek memorial site and author of the chapter “ Mass killings with poison gas at the Majdanek concentration camp ” of the book discussed here ( “ Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Konzentrationslager Majdanek @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is very familiar with the German edition of the book about that camp written by Jürgen Graf and myself .
In a Polish article of 2005 , which was translated into German two years later , he summarizes our book as follows : “ In connection with the computation of the number of victims for Majdanek , we must mention a revisionist book in which the questions of the deportations and the mortality , along with other topics , take up considerable space .
The authors deny the gassings and the mass shootings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mortality in the camp was significant on account of the living conditions and typhoid epidemics .
Based on an analysis of the available death books , they estimate that a total of 42,200 detainees lost their lives at Majdanek.
” In his contribution to the anthology discussed here , Kranz no longer even mentions this book .
He probably was discouraged from doing so by the German editors .
Kranz begins by saying that Odilo Globocnik , head of the SS and police in the district of Lublin , had regarded the Lublin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and had included it into “ Aktion Reinhardt , ” which he had organized ( p. 219 ) .
As far as the “ use of poison gas for homicidal purposes ” is concerned , Kranz continues , the Majdanek camp was a special case ( p .
219f. )
.
“ Not only were two different gases used here as killing agents in gas chambers – the disinfestation agent Zyklon B ( HCN ) and carbon monoxide ( CO ) – but a gas van was used as well .
It would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facilities in this camp was due to the SSPF [ SS and Police Leader , i.e .
Globocnik ] in Lublin.
” Kranz believes that two “ anecdotes ” [ sic ! ]
indirectly point this out : the report by Kurt Gerstein and the deposition of the head of the camp ’ s technical department , Friedrich W. Ruppert ( p. 220 ) .
Unfortunately , these two “ sources ” are not only “ indirect ” but have no historical value either… • The Gas Chamber of the Mauthausen Camp The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here is dedicated to the alleged gas chambers said to have existed in some concentration camps on the territory of the German Reich proper as it existed at the time : Mauthausen , Sachsenhausen , Ravensbrück , Neuengamme , Stutthof and Natzweiler .
The series begins with a contribution by Bertrand Perz and Florian Freund and is entitled “ Killings by means of poison gas at the Mauthausen concentration camp ” ( “ Tötungen durch Giftgas im Konzentrationslager Mauthausen ” ; pp .
244-259 ) .
The two authors can hardly contain their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their camp , Mauthausen – apart from Auschwitz – was not only the camp where “ Zyklon B was systematically used for homicidal purposes for the first time , ” but that in this camp “ more detainees [ were killed ] by poison gas than in the other concentration camps on the Reich territory ” ( p. 244 ) .
These murders by Zyklon B are reported to have taken place in a gas chamber as well as in a gas van , and furthermore in another gas chamber in Hartheim castle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Perz and Florian Freund state that fortunately “ the body of source material for these killings [ … ] is relatively good in spite of the destruction of many documents by the SS ” ( p. 244 ) .
This is , however , nothing but hot air , because these sources stem solely from post-war trials .
• The Gas Chamber of the Sachsenhausen camp The article on this topic , written by Hajo Funke and bearing the title “ The ‘ gas chamber lie ’ in the revisionist propaganda in Germany @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gaskammerlüge ’ in der revisionistischen Propaganda in Deutschland und Österreich ” ; pp .
382-393 ) , is so pitiful that it is not really worthwhile discussing it in detail .
• The Gas Chamber of the Ravensbrück Camp At the beginning of his article “ The gas chamber in the Ravensbrück concentration camp , early 1945 ” ( “ Die Gaskammer im Konzentrationslager Ravensbrück Anfang 1945 ” ; pp .
277-287 ) , Bernard Strebel writes that the history of the investigations into the gas chamber at Ravensbrück was “ closely linked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
Strebel himself admits that the first “ denier ” ( the correct term would of course be contester or person to contest ) of this gas chamber was , ironically , not a revisionist but the French historian Olga Wormser-Migot , a woman of jewish descent ( ibid. )
.
The strangest aspect of this alleged gas chamber is that it is said to have gone into operation only “ in the final phase of the camp history ” ( ibid . )
or more precisely in February 1945 ( p. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ odd timing , the question as to who ordered the killing station to be built , why , and for what reason is of utmost importance .
It is easy to retrace the way in which the legend of the Ravensbrück gas chamber took shape .
Over the last few months of 1944 , the conditions prevailing in all the remaining camps had taken a catastrophic turn for the worse – not only because the epidemics raging there had gone completely out of control , but also on account of the ever worsening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of food , provoked by the collapse of the German infrastructure which had been completely destroyed by Allied bombing .
These consequences of the war led to the death of thousands of inmates .
The mortality in the camps was to reach its peak only after the end of the claimed program of mass extermination .
➢ At Buchenwald , no fewer than 12,595 out of the total of 32,878 deaths registered in the statistics of the infirmary occurred in the first three and a half months of 1945 ( as compared to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ! )
➢ At Dachau , 15,385 detainees , more than half of the total of 27,839 deaths registered there , died between the beginning of January and the end of April of 1945 ( as compared to 12,455 detainees who died in the earlier four years ! )
➢ At Mauthausen , a total of 86,026 deaths have been registered , 36,043 of which belong to the period of January through May 1945 .
➢ At Sachsenhausen , a total of 19,900 deaths were registered in the years of 1940 through 1945 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – occurred in the first four months of 1945 .
When British and American troops reached these camps , they considered the horrifying scenes they saw in the camps as a confirmation of the intensive propaganda they had been subjected to over the years .
They believed that the National Socialists had exterminated entire groups of people , jews in particular , and ascribed the extreme mortality to an intentional policy of killing the inmates , which , in their opinion , had also been accomplished by means of gas chambers .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is hardly worthwhile to look at Reimer Möllers ’ s article “ The two murder actions with Zyklon B at the Neuengamme concentration camp in 1942 , ” ( “ Die beiden ‘ Zyklon B ’ -Mordaktionen im Konzentrationslager Neuengamme 1942 ” ; pp .
288-293 ) .
The text merely testifies to the fact that the orthodox Neuengamme historians have the insane feeling that they should add a gas chamber to “ their ” camp as well .
• The Gas Chamber at the Stutthof Camp The Polish historian Józef Orski writes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detainees of the Stutthof camp by the poison gas Zyklon B ” ( “ Die Vernichtung von Häftlingen des Konzentrationslagers Stutthof durch das Giftgas Zyklon B ” ; pp .
294-303 ) about the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Stutthof .
As early as 1999 , Jürgen Graf and I had published a book about this camp in German,68 in which Orski ’ s arguments had already been comprehensively refuted .
His arguments are , in fact , nothing but a mere rehash of the arguments which the Polish Stutthof historians have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chamber at the Natzweiler Camp Florian Schmaltz , author of the article “ The gas chamber at the Natzweiler concentration camp ” ( “ Die Gaskammer im Konzentrationslager Natzweiler ” ; pp .
304-315 ) , believes that this gas chamber was “ an exception ” in that “ scientific-medical research into the use of chemical weapons for military use were being carried out there ” ( p. 304 ) .
Schmaltz believes instead that the gas chamber was needed “ solely for experiments with the gaseous pulmonary agent phosgene ” which Otto @ @ @ @ @ @ @ section of the medical department at the Reichsuniversität Straßburg had undertaken ( p. 314 ) .
According to a witness , these experiments involved “ exposing between 90 and 150 inmates to phosgene , 50 to 60 of whom died painfully by suffocation ” ( p. 310 ) .
Schmaltz notes that the gas chamber at Natzweiler was the only gas chamber in a German camp to have been equipped with “ measuring devices ” which “ permitted to measure the concentration of phosgene in order to determine the dosage of this life-threatening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
According to Schmaltz , this chamber was built between the autumn 1942 and April 1943 ( p. 309 ) .
The last part of the anthology discussed here exhibits a specifically antirevisionist tendency and claims to refute the revisionists .
This results already from the title “ The ‘ gas chamber lie ’ in the international revisionist propaganda ” ( “ Die ‘ Gaskammer-Lüge ’ in der internationalen revisionistischen Propaganda ” ) which is meant to discredit revisionist research as mere “ propaganda.
” The anthology Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Socialist Mass Killings by Poison Gas ) claims to refute revisionism .
In doing so , it repeats the orthodox Holocaust dogmas about the Holocaust as handed down by their predecessors and at once attempts to reinforce these dogmas by claiming to refute revisionism .
Both aspects are present in some of the articles , whereas towards its end the book specifically aims at confronting revisionism .
Let us first consider the second aspect , i.e .
the evidence that the authors of the book present to support the officially sanctioned version of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that in a number of cases they were able to use sources which were made available only recently , they have not succeeded in presenting a scientifically sound demonstration of their theses .
Instead of such a demonstration , they offer the credo of a new and dogmatic historiography which no longer has to be proved because , according to the unfathomable mysteries of this creed , everything has already been shown to be true .
Questions which are absolutely fundamental remain unanswered , for example the manner in which the alleged gas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ B evolved from the alleged carbon monoxide chambers in the euthanasia centers , or the genesis and the evolution of the “ gas vans ” of the first and the second generation .
Instead , the authors arbitrarily link fictitious events created by the congress participants , which are based exclusively on contradictory witness statements that have been cleaned of their most blatant absurdities .
Another fundamental problem which the participants of the Oranienburg meeting have not even touched upon is the mythical “ Führer order ” to eradicate the Jews .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – or shall we say , dogmatically – assumed .
The gas chambers , whose existence remains to be demonstrated , are said to have been used in order to carry out an industrialized genocide , but nobody can say who ordered it at what time and for what reason .
Just as unexplored is a third question of equal importance : the choice of the various killing methods allegedly employed when implementing such a policy .
In the euthanasia centers , carbon monoxide in steel cylinders is claimed to have been used @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reinhardt ” camps it was exhaust gas from gasoline and/or diesel engines ; in Auschwitz and a few other camps it was Zyklon B , as against gas vans in Chełmno , in Serbia and behind the Russian front ; and a hodge-podge of means is claimed for Majdanek .
In spite of all the frantic efforts of the authors of the anthology to come up with a virtual relationship between all these widely diverging killing methods , recurring to the German Institute of Forensic Investigation as a kind of deus ex machina @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meeting of concentration camp commanders at Sachsenhausen , the critical reader ends up having the impression that the implementation of the alleged genocide had been left to the discretion of the local SS staff who , though acting without overall coordination , were still linked by means of three different chains of command , which were all independent of one another .
These orthodox historians attempt to demonstrate a horrifying mass murder carried out in chemical slaughterhouses in spite of the total lack of documentary proof and , for many camps , even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This clearly demonstrates both their credulity and ideological blindness as well as their resounding disregard for elementary scientific principles .
Exemplary in this regard is the way in which they rely exclusively on witness statements which they have selected and cleaned of the most nonsensical passages .
Even those chapters which at least merit discussion are superficially and hastily written ; sources are often not indicated , with many cross-references among the authors , leading to a sterile vicious circle .
I have summarized the situation regarding the source material for the existence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ gas van ” in Table 8 .
If we are to believe Achim Trunk , the mythical gas vans caused no fewer than 500,000 victims altogether , 250,000 in the Soviet Union , 152,477 at Chełmno , and consequently 97,500 at all the other sites where they were reportedly used .
However , not a single such vehicle has ever been found or photographed .
I have already expressed myself clearly on the subject of the sparse documents relating to this matter .
Between 1,385,000 and 1,785,000 persons are reported to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Aktion Reinhardt , ” without any documentary or material evidence for such a claim .
These are the fragile foundation of the Holocaust religion !
The same is true for the alleged gas chambers at Ravensbrück and Neuengamme .
At Majdanek and Stutthof , buildings which obviously were delousing chambers are presented as homicidal gas chambers , even though any evidence to support such assertions is lacking .
The same goes for the corresponding localities at Mauthausen and Sachsenhausen .
In the case of Auschwitz , the situation is rather complex and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it separately below .
Here , too , there is a complete absence of documentary evidence for the existence of homicidal gas chambers , but at least we have more than a dozen alleged “ criminal traces ” ( an expression coined by J.-C. Pressac ) , although if investigated in their context , they have no probative value either .
Again , in the case of Auschwitz the orthodox Holocaust historians are unable to tell us who ordered the construction of these gas chambers , at what point in time and under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data regarding the alleged murders with Zyklon B at the Auschwitz main camp and the two “ Bunkers ” of Birkenau .
For the Birkenau crematoria II to V there are alleged “ criminal traces , ” but their number reflects in no way the alleged duration of the operation or the number of victims who allegedly perished in the gas chambers installed there .
( We must remember that van Pelt affirms that at least 550,000 persons were gassed in the crematoria II and III alone , p. 216 ) .
Each @ @ @ @ @ @ @ traces ” can be explained in a completely innocuous way .
All of them concern only the period of planning and erection of these crematoria .
Not a single one of these “ traces ” dates from the time these facilities were in operation ( whatever operation this might have been ) .
Moreover , van Pelt ’ s contribution is of an even poorer quality than the others and has little more to offer than unproven apodictic assertions and fanciful hypotheses .
Still , the last part of the anthology is its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The “ gas chamber lie ” in international revisionist propaganda ” ( “ Die ‘ Gaskammer-Lüge ’ in der internationalen revisionistischen Propaganda ” ) , and its objective is to refute revisionism .
Yet the authors have not a single argument to offer .
One can not but feel that it was written to fulfill an unpleasant duty – after all , one of the stated aims of the Oranienburg meeting was the refutation of revisionism , even though not a single one of the participants was in a position to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The editors may have felt the need to publish these latter contributions in an attempt to make the book more voluminous and thus give it a more impressive appearance .
The same goes for those articles which are so devoid of significance or that are unrelated to the meeting ’ s topic that I have felt no urge to discuss them .
When compared to the preceding work , “ ‘ Nazi ’ Mass Murder , ” the present volume offers hardly any new ideas .
Although many of the “ at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] published since 1983 ” have been considered ( p. XVII ) , the quality has in no way been improved , because the sources are mentioned haphazardly in footnotes and merely serve to hide the lack of watertight documentary or material evidence .
On balance , the results of the Oranienburg meeting are devastating for orthodox Holocaust historiography .
The meeting has not succeeded in presenting a documented and coherent analysis of the genesis of the alleged industrial homicidal gas chambers and has failed spectacularly in its attempt to refute revisionism .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ survive thanks to propaganda and government repression .
In conclusion I wish to point out the most important revisionist studies that have been published over the last two decades and which deal with various aspects of the “ National Socialist mass killings by poison gas.
” The better part of these studies is available in two or more languages .
To the extent that they exist in German or English , I shall merely refer to them and omit any other language editions .
If the participants of the Oranienburg meeting had sincerely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they would have had to take these studies into account and refute them , but , except for one or two instances , they have not even mentioned them .

By Carlo Mattogno
In 2008 an international meeting of historians took place at Oranienburg, a northern suburb of Berlin, Germany. Three years later, the papers presented there were published as a collection by Günter Morsch and Bertrand Perz (and assisted by Astrid Ley) under the title Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch Giftgas (New Studies on the National Socialist Mass Killings by Poison Gas). In his foreword, Thomas Krüger describes the contents and the structure of this book with the following words (p. XII):
“This anthology summarizes new findings resulting from the international scientific meeting devoted to the topic ‘Mass murder by means of poison gas.’ It describes the aims and structures of revisionist propaganda and presents suggestions and concepts for the treatment of revisionist denial.”
As early as 1983, an anthology with the title Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas. Eine Dokumentation had appeared, claiming to refute revisionism by way of scientific historical methods. Still, in the introduction to the book being discussed here, Morsch and Perz are forced to admit that “questions and denials did not decrease after the publication of the collection in 1983” (p. XV) and that a new effort has thus become necessary.
The new work has six parts:
“Mass killings by poison gas: Scientific appraisal and memory.” “Technical and pharmacological aspects and the significance of remainders.” “The killing institutions of Aktion ‘T4’.” “Poison gas as a means of genocide in gas vans and extermination camps.” “Murder by gas in the concentration camps located in the ‘Altreich’ at Mauthausen, Stutthof und Natzweiler.” “The ‘gas chamber lie’ in the international revisionist propaganda.”
The significance of each contribution varies greatly. Some of them are so unimportant and have so little to do with the objectives of the Oranienburg meeting that they are hardly worth being discussed in any detail.
In the following analysis of the book I shall maintain the sequence in which the individual papers appear in the book. From time to time, however, I will allow myself to assess as a group those articles which deal with the same topic. For that reason, a discussion of the articles attacking revisionism, devoid of substance as they are, appears only towards the end of this present analysis.
The Lethal Gases
The first article deserving attention was written by Achim Trunk and is entitled “The lethal gases” (“Die todbringenden Gase”; pp. 23-49). It deals with the various gases allegedly used for killing people in the National Socialist era. The first three are well-known from Holocaust literature:
Carbon monoxide which, as we are told, was allegedly applied in the euthanasia centers during the so-called “Aktion 14f13,” in an experimental gas vans of “Sonderkommando Lange,” as well as in the Majdanek concentration camp.
Engine exhaust gases, said to have been employed in the camps of “Aktion Reinhardt” (Bełżec, Chełmno, Sobibór, Treblinka).
Zyklon B, claimed to have been used for killing people at Auschwitz, Majdanek, Mauthausen, Stutthof and Ravensbrück (as well as, maybe, Dachau).
The Euthanasia Centers and “Aktion 14 f 13”
No less than seven contributions are devoted to euthanasia centers. They vary in significance. I shall discuss them here as a group.
I should stress the point that the historical reality of the euthanasia of mental patients is not in doubt. Still, I think it is legitimate to raise the following questions:
What items of proof exist for the assertion that the euthanasia centers were equipped with homicidal gas chambers employing carbon monoxide? What items of proof permit the assertion that carbon monoxide in steel cylinders was used in the euthanasia centers? What items of proof allow establishing the Ludwigshafen branch of I.G. Farben as the supplier of carbon monoxide in steel bottles to the euthanasia centers? In what manner did carbon monoxide become the selected killing instrument? A secondary, albeit certainly not irrelevant question concerns the crematorium furnaces allegedly installed at the euthanasia centers. Is material or documentary evidence available for their existence? If so, which firms were the manufacturers? What type of fuel was used? How did they operate and what technical characteristics did they have? Most important however: what was their capacity? This latter question is relevant in connection with the number of persons killed, said to have exceeded 100 per day at some centers over a longer period of time (p. 146).
The Gas Vans
Mathias Beer’s article “Gas vans, from euthanasia to genocide” (“Gaswagen. Von der Euthanasie zum Genozid”; pp. 153-164) is nothing but a pale rehashing of his earlier study “The development of the gas vans and the murder of the jews” mentioned above (“Die Entwicklung der Gaswagen beim Mord an den juden”), which I have already analyzed critically in an earlier book. Even more than the first article, this one shows a blatant lack of critical judgment.
From Euthanasia to the Camps of “Aktion Reinhardt”
Let us now turn to the relationship between the euthanasia centers and the alleged extermination camps of “Aktion Reinhardt.” This topic is dealt with by Patricia Heberer in her article “From “Aktion TA” to the mass murder of the “European” jews. The transfer of the killer staff” (“Von der ‘Aktion T4’ zum Massenmord an den “europäischen” juden.’ Der Transfer des Tötungspersonals”; pp. 165-175). Two topics dominate here: the transfer of personnel from the euthanasia centers to the eastern camps of Bełżec, Treblinka and Majdanek, and the alleged relationship between the mysterious gas chambers at these centers and those of the three camps. This second point is what mainly concerns us here.
Patricia Heberer believes that euthanasia had served “in many ways as a technical model for the ‘final solution,’” whose planners had “referred to the experience and the methods of ‘Aktion T4’ (p. 171).
Patricia Heberer concludes that the men of “Aktion T4” had arrived in occupied Poland with a thorough knowledge of the gassing procedure and the corpse incineration process (p. 175).
This thesis is a little adventurous. We have heard that in the euthanasia centers crematoria were allegedly used for this purpose, and so one wonders about the experience the men of “Aktion T4” may have had when it came to open-air incinerations as allegedly employed in the Bełżec, Sobibór and Treblinka camps. What is much more important, however, is the question of the gas chambers. Heberer’s “model” theory is not supported by the sources, as the descriptions of witnesses relating to the gas chambers for euthanasia centers are radically different from the chambers allegedly used in the “eastern extermination camps.”
The Chełmno Camp
In his article titled “Mass killings through poison gas at the Chełmno camp” (“Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Vernichtungslager Chełmno”; pp. 176-184) Peter Klein deals with the Chełmno camp (German name: Kulmhof). In line with the usual practice of orthodox Holocaust historiography, he begins his account with a letter allegedly written on 16 July 1941 by SS-Sturmbannführer Rolf-Heinz Höppner, Head of the Security Service’s central district of Posen, and addressed to SS-Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann. The letter reads i.a.:
“All the Warthegau jews will be assembled in a camp for 300,000 jews which will be built in the form of barracks as close as possible to the railway line carrying coal and which contains equipment for industrial workers, tailors, cobblers and so on […] This winter there is a danger that not all jews can be fed any longer. We must seriously consider whether the most humane solution is not to eliminate the jews by some substance with rapid effect insofar as they are unfit to work.”
Klein has to admit, however, that “there is no written evidence for the conclusion that during this conversation the ‘jewish question’ too was on the agenda” (p. 177). This is a blatant understatement, for there are no written documents on the subject of this meeting. The only evidence for the meeting to have taken place is a photograph dated 18 July 1941 showing Hitler in conversation with Greiser (footnote 4 on p. 177)! It is truly breathtaking to what extent Klein loads this snapshot with interpretations.
The Camps of “Aktion Reinhardt”
Dieter Pohl’s article “Mass killings with poison gas within the framework of ‘Aktion Reinhardt’” (“Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Rahmen der ‘Aktion Reinhardt’”; pp. 185-196) is a real disappointment. The author pretends to present an overview of the state of the art of Holocaust research on the camps at Bełżec, Sobibór and Treblinka, but he is a far cry from fulfilling his promise, as he limited himself to rehashing hackneyed assertions.
Early into his explanations, Dieter Pohl writes that the background of the “mass murder” has not been fully elucidated to this date (“nicht völlig durchleuchtet,” p. 185). After summarizing very briefly the NS policy towards the jews in the General Government – the project of a “Judenreservat” (jewish reservation) in the District of Lublin, the plans for the removal of the jews into the occupied Soviet territories, as well as the role of the ghettos as transit stations for this expulsion – he comes up, as if by magic, with an alleged plan for the physical elimination of the jews (p. 186).
“At roughly the same time, in September 1941, the National Socialist leadership decided to carry out systematic mass murders also outside of the occupied Soviet territories, e.g. in the Warthegau, the Polish part of the Province of Posen, but also in Serbia. […] It is most likely that, on 13 October 1941, SS-Chief Heinrich Himmler ordered the SS and Police Leader in the District of Lublin, Odilo Globocnik, to organize such a murder action within the GG [General Government].”
Regarding the hypothesized decision of a complete eradication of the jews, orthodox Holocaust historiography has begun in recent years to move away from a “Führer order,” and instead assumes a mere “decision” by Hitler, allegedly taken on 12 December 1941.
The desperate attempts by orthodox Holocaust historians to finally nail down in a conclusive manner a date for the decision to “eradicate the jews” only continue to complicate the issue still further.
Van Pelt’s Auschwitz
The anthology under discussion here contains two articles by Robert J. van Pelt: “Auschwitz” (p. 196-218) and “For want of a nail, or reflections on how history must not be rewritten” (“Weil ein Nagel fehlte, oder Überlegungen, wie die Geschichte nicht umgeschrieben werden darf”; pp. 343- 354). It seems logical to discuss both contributions together. I shall start with the second one. We are dealing here with a polemic rather than a serious paper, which is revealed by its frequent use of inflammatory words (several times van Pelt even refers to Clausewitz!). While the author apologizes for his “military metaphors,” he still considers that “the fight against the denial of the Holocaust” feels “like a war” and “is conceived as a defensive battle” (p. 344).
This introduction makes the reader believe that he witnesses a fight to the finish against the revisionist “enemy,” but anyone reading the article carefully gets the impression of not observing a “war,” or at least a “battle,” but rather merely a desperate rear-guard skirmish. The author ends his contribution by a somewhat shameless self-adulation.
The Gas Chambers of the Majdanek Camp
Tomasz Kranz, the director of the Majdanek memorial site and author of the chapter “Mass killings with poison gas at the Majdanek concentration camp” of the book discussed here (“Massentötungen durch Giftgas im Konzentrationslager Majdanek”; pp. 219-227), is very familiar with the German edition of the book about that camp written by Jürgen Graf and myself. In a Polish article of 2005, which was translated into German two years later, he summarizes our book as follows:
“In connection with the computation of the number of victims for Majdanek, we must mention a revisionist book in which the questions of the deportations and the mortality, along with other topics, take up considerable space. The authors deny the gassings and the mass shootings of detainees but do admit that the mortality in the camp was significant on account of the living conditions and typhoid epidemics. Based on an analysis of the available death books, they estimate that a total of 42,200 detainees lost their lives at Majdanek.”
In his contribution to the anthology discussed here, Kranz no longer even mentions this book. He probably was discouraged from doing so by the German editors.
Kranz begins by saying that Odilo Globocnik, head of the SS and police in the district of Lublin, had regarded the Lublin concentration camp as “his own” and had included it into “Aktion Reinhardt,” which he had organized (p. 219). As far as the “use of poison gas for homicidal purposes” is concerned, Kranz continues, the Majdanek camp was a special case (p. 219f.).
“Not only were two different gases used here as killing agents in gas chambers – the disinfestation agent Zyklon B (HCN) and carbon monoxide (CO) – but a gas van was used as well. It would appear that the installation of the gassing facilities in this camp was due to the SSPF [SS and Police Leader, i.e. Globocnik] in Lublin.”
Kranz believes that two “anecdotes” [sic!] indirectly point this out: the report by Kurt Gerstein and the deposition of the head of the camp’s technical department, Friedrich W. Ruppert (p. 220). Unfortunately, these two “sources” are not only “indirect” but have no historical value either…
The Gas Chamber of the Mauthausen Camp
The fifth part of the book under scrutiny here is dedicated to the alleged gas chambers said to have existed in some concentration camps on the territory of the German Reich proper as it existed at the time: Mauthausen, Sachsenhausen, Ravensbrück, Neuengamme, Stutthof and Natzweiler.
The series begins with a contribution by Bertrand Perz and Florian Freund and is entitled “Killings by means of poison gas at the Mauthausen concentration camp” (“Tötungen durch Giftgas im Konzentrationslager Mauthausen”; pp. 244-259). The two authors can hardly contain their pride at being able to show that their camp, Mauthausen – apart from Auschwitz – was not only the camp where “Zyklon B was systematically used for homicidal purposes for the first time,” but that in this camp “more detainees [were killed] by poison gas than in the other concentration camps on the Reich territory” (p. 244). These murders by Zyklon B are reported to have taken place in a gas chamber as well as in a gas van, and furthermore in another gas chamber in Hartheim castle located not far from Mauthausen.
Bertrand Perz and Florian Freund state that fortunately “the body of source material for these killings […] is relatively good in spite of the destruction of many documents by the SS” (p. 244). This is, however, nothing but hot air, because these sources stem solely from post-war trials.
The Gas Chamber of the Sachsenhausen camp
The article on this topic, written by Hajo Funke and bearing the title “The ‘gas chamber lie’ in the revisionist propaganda in Germany and Austria” (“Die ‘Gaskammerlüge’ in der revisionistischen Propaganda in Deutschland und Österreich”; pp. 382-393), is so pitiful that it is not really worthwhile discussing it in detail.
The Gas Chamber of the Ravensbrück Camp
At the beginning of his article “The gas chamber in the Ravensbrück concentration camp, early 1945” (“Die Gaskammer im Konzentrationslager Ravensbrück Anfang 1945”; pp. 277-287), Bernard Strebel writes that the history of the investigations into the gas chamber at Ravensbrück was “closely linked with its denial” (p. 277). Strebel himself admits that the first “denier” (the correct term would of course be contester or person to contest) of this gas chamber was, ironically, not a revisionist but the French historian Olga Wormser-Migot, a woman of jewish descent (ibid.).
The strangest aspect of this alleged gas chamber is that it is said to have gone into operation only “in the final phase of the camp history” (ibid.) or more precisely in February 1945 (p. 282). In view of this odd timing, the question as to who ordered the killing station to be built, why, and for what reason is of utmost importance.
It is easy to retrace the way in which the legend of the Ravensbrück gas chamber took shape. Over the last few months of 1944, the conditions prevailing in all the remaining camps had taken a catastrophic turn for the worse – not only because the epidemics raging there had gone completely out of control, but also on account of the ever worsening hygienic and sanitary situation and the lack of food, provoked by the collapse of the German infrastructure which had been completely destroyed by Allied bombing. These consequences of the war led to the death of thousands of inmates. The mortality in the camps was to reach its peak only after the end of the claimed program of mass extermination.
A number of terse statistical data demonstrates this:
➢ At Buchenwald, no fewer than 12,595 out of the total of 32,878 deaths registered in the statistics of the infirmary occurred in the first three and a half months of 1945 (as compared to 20,283 deaths in the preceding six years!)
➢ At Dachau, 15,385 detainees, more than half of the total of 27,839 deaths registered there, died between the beginning of January and the end of April of 1945 (as compared to 12,455 detainees who died in the earlier four years!)
➢ At Mauthausen, a total of 86,026 deaths have been registered, 36,043 of which belong to the period of January through May 1945.
➢ At Sachsenhausen, a total of 19,900 deaths were registered in the years of 1940 through 1945; a quarter of them – 4,821 – occurred in the first four months of 1945.
When British and American troops reached these camps, they considered the horrifying scenes they saw in the camps as a confirmation of the intensive propaganda they had been subjected to over the years. They believed that the National Socialists had exterminated entire groups of people, jews in particular, and ascribed the extreme mortality to an intentional policy of killing the inmates, which, in their opinion, had also been accomplished by means of gas chambers.
The Gassings at the Neuengamme Camp
It is hardly worthwhile to look at Reimer Möllers’s article “The two murder actions with Zyklon B at the Neuengamme concentration camp in 1942,” (“Die beiden ‘Zyklon B’-Mordaktionen im Konzentrationslager Neuengamme 1942”; pp. 288-293). The text merely testifies to the fact that the orthodox Neuengamme historians have the insane feeling that they should add a gas chamber to “their” camp as well.
The Gas Chamber at the Stutthof Camp
The Polish historian Józef Orski writes in his article “The annihilation of detainees of the Stutthof camp by the poison gas Zyklon B” (“Die Vernichtung von Häftlingen des Konzentrationslagers Stutthof durch das Giftgas Zyklon B”; pp. 294-303) about the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Stutthof. As early as 1999, Jürgen Graf and I had published a book about this camp in German,68 in which Orski’s arguments had already been comprehensively refuted. His arguments are, in fact, nothing but a mere rehash of the arguments which the Polish Stutthof historians have been proffering for decades.
The Gas Chamber at the Natzweiler Camp
Florian Schmaltz, author of the article “The gas chamber at the Natzweiler concentration camp” (“Die Gaskammer im Konzentrationslager Natzweiler”; pp. 304-315), believes that this gas chamber was “an exception” in that “scientific-medical research into the use of chemical weapons for military use were being carried out there” (p. 304).
Schmaltz believes instead that the gas chamber was needed “solely for experiments with the gaseous pulmonary agent phosgene” which Otto Bickenbach, the head of the biological section of the medical department at the Reichsuniversität Straßburg had undertaken (p. 314). According to a witness, these experiments involved “exposing between 90 and 150 inmates to phosgene, 50 to 60 of whom died painfully by suffocation” (p. 310).
Schmaltz notes that the gas chamber at Natzweiler was the only gas chamber in a German camp to have been equipped with “measuring devices” which “permitted to measure the concentration of phosgene in order to determine the dosage of this life-threatening poison gas” (p. 314). According to Schmaltz, this chamber was built between the autumn 1942 and April 1943 (p. 309).
The Mysterious Gas Chamber at Dachau
The last part of the anthology discussed here exhibits a specifically antirevisionist tendency and claims to refute the revisionists. This results already from the title “The ‘gas chamber lie’ in the international revisionist propaganda” (“Die ‘Gaskammer-Lüge’ in der internationalen revisionistischen Propaganda”) which is meant to discredit revisionist research as mere “propaganda.”
Conclusion
The anthology Neue Studien zu nationalsozialistischen Massentötungen durch Giftgas (New Studies on the National Socialist Mass Killings by Poison Gas) claims to refute revisionism. In doing so, it repeats the orthodox Holocaust dogmas about the Holocaust as handed down by their predecessors and at once attempts to reinforce these dogmas by claiming to refute revisionism. Both aspects are present in some of the articles, whereas towards its end the book specifically aims at confronting revisionism.
Let us first consider the second aspect, i.e. the evidence that the authors of the book present to support the officially sanctioned version of history. In spite of the fact that in a number of cases they were able to use sources which were made available only recently, they have not succeeded in presenting a scientifically sound demonstration of their theses. Instead of such a demonstration, they offer the credo of a new and dogmatic historiography which no longer has to be proved because, according to the unfathomable mysteries of this creed, everything has already been shown to be true. Questions which are absolutely fundamental remain unanswered, for example the manner in which the alleged gas chambers using engine exhaust gases or Zyklon B evolved from the alleged carbon monoxide chambers in the euthanasia centers, or the genesis and the evolution of the “gas vans” of the first and the second generation. Instead, the authors arbitrarily link fictitious events created by the congress participants, which are based exclusively on contradictory witness statements that have been cleaned of their most blatant absurdities.
Another fundamental problem which the participants of the Oranienburg meeting have not even touched upon is the mythical “Führer order” to eradicate the Jews. The existence of such an order is tacitly – or shall we say, dogmatically – assumed. The gas chambers, whose existence remains to be demonstrated, are said to have been used in order to carry out an industrialized genocide, but nobody can say who ordered it at what time and for what reason.
Just as unexplored is a third question of equal importance: the choice of the various killing methods allegedly employed when implementing such a policy. In the euthanasia centers, carbon monoxide in steel cylinders is claimed to have been used; in some of the “Aktion Reinhardt” camps it was exhaust gas from gasoline and/or diesel engines; in Auschwitz and a few other camps it was Zyklon B, as against gas vans in Chełmno, in Serbia and behind the Russian front; and a hodge-podge of means is claimed for Majdanek. In spite of all the frantic efforts of the authors of the anthology to come up with a virtual relationship between all these widely diverging killing methods, recurring to the German Institute of Forensic Investigation as a kind of deus ex machina, or by conjuring up a fictitious meeting of concentration camp commanders at Sachsenhausen, the critical reader ends up having the impression that the implementation of the alleged genocide had been left to the discretion of the local SS staff who, though acting without overall coordination, were still linked by means of three different chains of command, which were all independent of one another.
These orthodox historians attempt to demonstrate a horrifying mass murder carried out in chemical slaughterhouses in spite of the total lack of documentary proof and, for many camps, even the lack of any circumstantial evidence. This clearly demonstrates both their credulity and ideological blindness as well as their resounding disregard for elementary scientific principles. Exemplary in this regard is the way in which they rely exclusively on witness statements which they have selected and cleaned of the most nonsensical passages.
Even those chapters which at least merit discussion are superficially and hastily written; sources are often not indicated, with many cross-references among the authors, leading to a sterile vicious circle.
I have summarized the situation regarding the source material for the existence of the alleged homicidal gas chambers and “gas van” in Table 8.
If we are to believe Achim Trunk, the mythical gas vans caused no fewer than 500,000 victims altogether, 250,000 in the Soviet Union, 152,477 at Chełmno, and consequently 97,500 at all the other sites where they were reportedly used. However, not a single such vehicle has ever been found or photographed. I have already expressed myself clearly on the subject of the sparse documents relating to this matter.
Between 1,385,000 and 1,785,000 persons are reported to have perished in the alleged gas chambers of “Aktion Reinhardt,” without any documentary or material evidence for such a claim. These are the fragile foundation of the Holocaust religion! The same is true for the alleged gas chambers at Ravensbrück and Neuengamme.
At Majdanek and Stutthof, buildings which obviously were delousing chambers are presented as homicidal gas chambers, even though any evidence to support such assertions is lacking. The same goes for the corresponding localities at Mauthausen and Sachsenhausen.
In the case of Auschwitz, the situation is rather complex and somewhat different. I will therefore discuss it separately below. Here, too, there is a complete absence of documentary evidence for the existence of homicidal gas chambers, but at least we have more than a dozen alleged “criminal traces” (an expression coined by J.-C. Pressac), although if investigated in their context, they have no probative value either.
Again, in the case of Auschwitz the orthodox Holocaust historians are unable to tell us who ordered the construction of these gas chambers, at what point in time and under what circumstances. Table 9 summarizes the data regarding the alleged murders with Zyklon B at the Auschwitz main camp and the two “Bunkers” of Birkenau.
For the Birkenau crematoria II to V there are alleged “criminal traces,” but their number reflects in no way the alleged duration of the operation or the number of victims who allegedly perished in the gas chambers installed there. (We must remember that van Pelt affirms that at least 550,000 persons were gassed in the crematoria II and III alone, p. 216). Each one of the 15 so-called “criminal traces” can be explained in a completely innocuous way. All of them concern only the period of planning and erection of these crematoria. Not a single one of these “traces” dates from the time these facilities were in operation (whatever operation this might have been). Moreover, van Pelt’s contribution is of an even poorer quality than the others and has little more to offer than unproven apodictic assertions and fanciful hypotheses.
Still, the last part of the anthology is its absolute nadir. It is pompously titled “The “gas chamber lie” in international revisionist propaganda” (“Die ‘Gaskammer-Lüge’ in der internationalen revisionistischen Propaganda”), and its objective is to refute revisionism. Yet the authors have not a single argument to offer. One cannot but feel that it was written to fulfill an unpleasant duty – after all, one of the stated aims of the Oranienburg meeting was the refutation of revisionism, even though not a single one of the participants was in a position to do so even in a rudimentary way. The editors may have felt the need to publish these latter contributions in an attempt to make the book more voluminous and thus give it a more impressive appearance. The same goes for those articles which are so devoid of significance or that are unrelated to the meeting’s topic that I have felt no urge to discuss them.
When compared to the preceding work, “‘Nazi’ Mass Murder,” the present volume offers hardly any new ideas. Although many of the “at least 60 pertinent articles and monographs […] published since 1983” have been considered (p. XVII), the quality has in no way been improved, because the sources are mentioned haphazardly in footnotes and merely serve to hide the lack of watertight documentary or material evidence.
On balance, the results of the Oranienburg meeting are devastating for orthodox Holocaust historiography. The meeting has not succeeded in presenting a documented and coherent analysis of the genesis of the alleged industrial homicidal gas chambers and has failed spectacularly in its attempt to refute revisionism. This kind of pseudo-scientific historiography can only survive thanks to propaganda and government repression.
In conclusion I wish to point out the most important revisionist studies that have been published over the last two decades and which deal with various aspects of the “National Socialist mass killings by poison gas.” The better part of these studies is available in two or more languages. To the extent that they exist in German or English, I shall merely refer to them and omit any other language editions.
If the participants of the Oranienburg meeting had sincerely wished to fulfill their duty as historians, they would have had to take these studies into account and refute them, but, except for one or two instances, they have not even mentioned them.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-04-15--Ken Copeland’s ‘Wind Of God’ Remix

Ken Copeland’s ‘Wind Of God’ Remix

You wan na know how to beat the coronavirus ?
Ken Copeland lets you know that faith in the lord @ @ @ @ @ troubled times .

You wanna know how to beat the coronavirus? Ken Copeland lets you know that faith in the lord will see us through these troubled times.


renegadetribune--2020-04-15--REX 84, FEMA, Corona, Martial Law, and The Actor in Chief

It appears that the “ state of emergency ” announced by Trump has changed the entire chain of command of @ @ @ @ @

President Trump, Vice President Pence and first lady Melania Trump visit the Federal Emergency Management Agency headquarters in Washington, D.C., on June 6. Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen and FEMA Administrator Brock Long are seated at right. This summer, DHS transferred nearly $10 million from FEMA to immigration authorities, according to a congressional document.


renegadetribune--2020-04-15--Conspiracy FACT: Why Do the WHO and CDC Require ZERO Virus Testing for “COVID DEATHS”?

Since my last personal note to you on April 8th , I received hundreds of powerfully affirmative responses .
I am not able to respond to them all , but know that I do make my best effort to read each and every one of them .
Clearly you want to know what ’ s going on , without it being watered down .
And like me , I think you realize the cost of inaction , or a lack of inquiry , may be far worse than the risks associated with openly questioning and even challenging the dominant narrative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consenting to house arrest , despite the fact that it violates many of our basic civil liberties ) .
I truly believe I am witnessing the beginning murmurs of a collective awakening — which may be the true silver lining of this plan-demic ( I ’ m just going to call it what it is from here on out ) .
I ’ d like to direct you to a colleague ’ s post on the 7 silver linings of the Pandemic if you need more encouragement .
Also , my beloved wife @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Why the Present Moment is an Opportunity .
For those who missed my last email , it ’ s now in article form after some of you asked to share it via social media : Let ’ s Get Real About This So-Called “ Plan-Demic ” .
Since then , we ’ ve seen a powerful tug-of-war between the “ doom-and-gloom ” spinners and those who are willing to speak up and against what is increasingly feeling like a theater of the absurd .
This is one reason why I derive great pleasure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — tragicomically accurate — on a metaphoric level .
This is the same CNN whose lead reported Anderson Cooper was a CIA intern and which is based in Atlanta , GA , where the CDC lives .
If you recall , on March 14th they published a highly dubious Imperial College fatality estimate as if it were fact , claiming that 1.7 million Americans would die if the entire country wasn ’ t locked down , and that the mandatory quarantine and social distancing measures ( not to mention the economic devastation this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last as long as 18-months “ until a vaccine is available.
” The lead author Fergusen later unapologetically retracted that estimate ( even though it had already adversely affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people ) .
This was the report that turned the at-the-time much more optimistic Trump , and the next day he bowed to the pressures of the deep state , i.e .
military-medical industrial establishment , locking the country down on March 15th , for the first 14-days .
CNN continues , daily , to catastrophize .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ highly inflammatory and dubious information from their daily Coronavirus email update : “ A new study modeled on Chinese data suggests that lockdowns can ’ t be fully relaxed until a vaccine is available — and warns that loosening restrictions could result in a second wave of infections in mid-summer .
And worrying new research from the Korean CDC indicates that the virus may “ reactivate ” in people previously cured of the illness , Bloomberg reports.
” The propaganda , however , can not account for the reality that the COVID-19 deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being clinically or virologically confirmed as anything more than “ suspected.
” Both the US health statistics agency and the World Health Organization have announced that the certification of “ deaths by COVID-19 ” require ZERO proof that a virus is the cause of death .
Yet , these “ fatalities ” are reported throughout the world ’ s media as true , without question .
And this is what media outlets like CNN ( and thousands like them , incidentally owned by the same 6 corporations ) use to fan the flames @ @ @ @ @ @ @ justify a highly destructive global lockdown that will likely cause millions to lose their lives due to the adverse socioeconomic and psychobiological adverse effects that will follow .
Listen to Dr. Scott Jensen describe how the CDC ’ s COVID-19 death reporting guidelines are essentially baseless , and how Dr. Fauci is calling anyone pointing out that the emperor has no clothes “ conspiracy theorists.
” They ’ ve got virtually nothing left in the way of credibility , so they resort to name-calling and dehumanization .
Ironically , the most consistent response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you about the plan-demic was that I should watch the world ’ s most controversial “ conspiracy theorist ” David Icke ’ s interview for London Real which was almost immediately removed by both Vimeo and Youtube .
Doesn ’ t the fact of its aggressive censorship make you want to watch it for that reason alone ?
Here it is for those who want to take the “ red pill ” : THE CORONAVIRUS CONSPIRACY : HOW COVID-19 WILL SEIZE YOUR RIGHTS & DESTROY OUR ECONOMY .
I don ’ t think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , given that so much of what he is speaking about is already happening , or is even being reported on in the mainstream media .
For instance , Bill Gates has been talking about the introduction of “ immunity certificates ” that would require we get a COVID vaccine to be able to leave our houses , go back to work , and travel .
There ’ s been plenty of lead up to this .
Gates has already been funding research into “ invisible ink tattoos that could be used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to him discuss his vision for you and I here on Youtube here .
A few months ago , this would have been written off as conspiracy theory .
Now it ’ s being boldly stated by self-appointed social engineers and world health planners such as Gates merely as “ what ’ s going to happen.
” Take what resonates from the Icke interview , and leave what doesn ’ t .
I ’ m certainly interested in hearing back from some of you to see how that landed .
A couple final @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to make some of you angry and even more concerned about what ’ s going on , I share it because I believe its important that we all know what the planners of this event want to happen next ( I ’ m absolutely not going to stand by it , and if you won ’ t either , please join Stand for Health Freedom where we are developing a campaign to fight for your freedoms ) .
Here ’ s a video of Dr. Mike Ryan , the WHO ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ May have to enter homes and remove family members.
” While this sounds outrageous and like a bad science fiction film , it is even more outrageous that hundreds of millions of people , around the world , are standing down in full compliance with whatever the authorities say should happen next .
The reality is that blind faith and compliance with the WHO ’ s and CDC ’ s plan-demic may very well result in the nightmarish scenario described by Dr. Ryan above .
The “ frog ” is already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unquestionably accepted the world over despite a significant body of evidence showing it can do great harm : 13 Studies Reveal How Social Distancing ( i.e .
Social Isolation ) Can Increase Mortality .
The reality is that independent epidemiological research on social distancing effectively reducing contagion-based morbidity and mortality is equivocal at best .
But the heat is slowly being turned up .
A practice now being mandated in cities around the United States ( and world ) , is the wearing of face masks .
My latest report FACE IT : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mask Wearing Doesn ’ t Exist ; The WHO Agrees sheds light on the reality that the WHO itself warns against the practice because it can make the problem worse .
And so , if the practice does not prove “ live saving ” results as widely claimed , then it is more accurate to view it as an almost cult-like fetish or muzzle , demonstrating to the world one ’ s unquestioning compliance in a form of full spectrum dominance this world has never before seen .
If we continue to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threatening those around us who don ’ t comply ) , without question , it is unlikely there will be resistance when other agendas are unleashed , such as a Chinese-style social credit system is rolled out , mandatory vaccination , a digital ID tied to vaccination status , a 5G enabled real time surveillance network , a global governance system that will preempt the rights of individual nations , and many others .
All , ostensibly , to “ save us from a virus , ” which truth be told , relative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as heart disease , diabetes , and cancer , and even seasonal flu , makes a cruel mockery of the actions taken thus far in the name of saving us from COVID .
Thanks for being part of this list and our community .
I ’ ll do my best to keep you informed , and I hope to launch the Regenerate Project community soon , where we will be focusing on resilience strategies and deep , evidence-based inspiration through the lens of the New Biophysics , in this trying time !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ or download the Audible version — so you ’ ll be ready to join me and can share your insights , questions and experiences !

Since my last personal note to you on April 8th, I received hundreds of powerfully affirmative responses. I am not able to respond to them all, but know that I do make my best effort to read each and every one of them.
Clearly you want to know what’s going on, without it being watered down. And like me, I think you realize the cost of inaction, or a lack of inquiry, may be far worse than the risks associated with openly questioning and even challenging the dominant narrative (so dominant that we are all consenting to house arrest, despite the fact that it violates many of our basic civil liberties).
I truly believe I am witnessing the beginning murmurs of a collective awakening — which may be the true silver lining of this plan-demic (I’m just going to call it what it is from here on out). I’d like to direct you to a colleague’s post on the 7 silver linings of the Pandemic if you need more encouragement. Also, my beloved wife Kelly Brogan’s new piece: Why the Present Moment is an Opportunity.
For those who missed my last email, it’s now in article form after some of you asked to share it via social media: Let’s Get Real About This So-Called “Plan-Demic”.
Since then, we’ve seen a powerful tug-of-war between the “doom-and-gloom” spinners and those who are willing to speak up and against what is increasingly feeling like a theater of the absurd. This is one reason why I derive great pleasure from the meme below, which is — tragicomically accurate — on a metaphoric level.
This is the same CNN whose lead reported Anderson Cooper was a CIA intern and which is based in Atlanta, GA, where the CDC lives.
If you recall, on March 14th they published a highly dubious Imperial College fatality estimate as if it were fact, claiming that 1.7 million Americans would die if the entire country wasn’t locked down, and that the mandatory quarantine and social distancing measures (not to mention the economic devastation this “health policy” wrought) could last as long as 18-months “until a vaccine is available.” The lead author Fergusen later unapologetically retracted that estimate (even though it had already adversely affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people). This was the report that turned the at-the-time much more optimistic Trump, and the next day he bowed to the pressures of the deep state, i.e. military-medical industrial establishment, locking the country down on March 15th, for the first 14-days. CNN continues, daily, to catastrophize. Here’s a new piece of highly inflammatory and dubious information from their daily Coronavirus email update:
“A new study modeled on Chinese data suggests that lockdowns can’t be fully relaxed until a vaccine is available — and warns that loosening restrictions could result in a second wave of infections in mid-summer. And worrying new research from the Korean CDC indicates that the virus may “reactivate” in people previously cured of the illness, Bloomberg reports.”
The propaganda, however, cannot account for the reality that the COVID-19 deaths being recorded around the world are not being clinically or virologically confirmed as anything more than “suspected.” Both the US health statistics agency and the World Health Organization have announced that the certification of “deaths by COVID-19” require ZERO proof that a virus is the cause of death. Yet, these “fatalities” are reported throughout the world’s media as true, without question. And this is what media outlets like CNN (and thousands like them, incidentally owned by the same 6 corporations) use to fan the flames of fear, hysteria, and ultimately justify a highly destructive global lockdown that will likely cause millions to lose their lives due to the adverse socioeconomic and psychobiological adverse effects that will follow.
Listen to Dr. Scott Jensen describe how the CDC’s COVID-19 death reporting guidelines are essentially baseless, and how Dr. Fauci is calling anyone pointing out that the emperor has no clothes “conspiracy theorists.” They’ve got virtually nothing left in the way of credibility, so they resort to name-calling and dehumanization.
Ironically, the most consistent response I had since my last email to you about the plan-demic was that I should watch the world’s most controversial “conspiracy theorist” David Icke’s interview for London Real which was almost immediately removed by both Vimeo and Youtube. Doesn’t the fact of its aggressive censorship make you want to watch it for that reason alone? Here it is for those who want to take the “red pill”: THE CORONAVIRUS CONSPIRACY: HOW COVID-19 WILL SEIZE YOUR RIGHTS & DESTROY OUR ECONOMY. I don’t think it will shock too many of you, given that so much of what he is speaking about is already happening, or is even being reported on in the mainstream media. For instance, Bill Gates has been talking about the introduction of “immunity certificates” that would require we get a COVID vaccine to be able to leave our houses, go back to work, and travel. There’s been plenty of lead up to this. Gates has already been funding research into “invisible ink tattoos that could be used to ID vaccinated kids.” You can listen to him discuss his vision for you and I here on Youtube here. A few months ago, this would have been written off as conspiracy theory. Now it’s being boldly stated by self-appointed social engineers and world health planners such as Gates merely as “what’s going to happen.” Take what resonates from the Icke interview, and leave what doesn’t. I’m certainly interested in hearing back from some of you to see how that landed.
A couple final things to consider. While this is going to make some of you angry and even more concerned about what’s going on, I share it because I believe its important that we all know what the planners of this event want to happen next (I’m absolutely not going to stand by it, and if you won’t either, please join Stand for Health Freedom where we are developing a campaign to fight for your freedoms). Here’s a video of Dr. Mike Ryan, the WHO’s Emergencies Program director, saying that they: “May have to enter homes and remove family members.” While this sounds outrageous and like a bad science fiction film, it is even more outrageous that hundreds of millions of people, around the world, are standing down in full compliance with whatever the authorities say should happen next.
The reality is that blind faith and compliance with the WHO’s and CDC’s plan-demic may very well result in the nightmarish scenario described by Dr. Ryan above. The “frog” is already boiling. Social distancing has already been unquestionably accepted the world over despite a significant body of evidence showing it can do great harm: 13 Studies Reveal How Social Distancing (i.e. Social Isolation) Can Increase Mortality. The reality is that independent epidemiological research on social distancing effectively reducing contagion-based morbidity and mortality is equivocal at best.
But the heat is slowly being turned up. A practice now being mandated in cities around the United States (and world), is the wearing of face masks. My latest report FACE IT: The Evidence Proving the Effectiveness of Community Mask Wearing Doesn’t Exist; The WHO Agrees sheds light on the reality that the WHO itself warns against the practice because it can make the problem worse. And so, if the practice does not prove “live saving” results as widely claimed, then it is more accurate to view it as an almost cult-like fetish or muzzle, demonstrating to the world one’s unquestioning compliance in a form of full spectrum dominance this world has never before seen.
If we continue to give up our rights (even shaming or threatening those around us who don’t comply), without question, it is unlikely there will be resistance when other agendas are unleashed, such as a Chinese-style social credit system is rolled out, mandatory vaccination, a digital ID tied to vaccination status, a 5G enabled real time surveillance network, a global governance system that will preempt the rights of individual nations, and many others. All, ostensibly, to “save us from a virus,” which truth be told, relative to the deaths from equally preventable causes such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer, and even seasonal flu, makes a cruel mockery of the actions taken thus far in the name of saving us from COVID.
Thanks for being part of this list and our community. I’ll do my best to keep you informed, and I hope to launch the Regenerate Project community soon, where we will be focusing on resilience strategies and deep, evidence-based inspiration through the lens of the New Biophysics, in this trying time! Grab your copy of my book — or download the Audible version — so you’ll be ready to join me and can share your insights, questions and experiences!


renegadetribune--2020-04-15--Documents Reveal Feds Are Excited To Create A Mass A.I. Surveillance Network

A FOIA request by the Electronic Privacy Information Center revealed how excited the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence ( NSCAI ) is about using CCTV cameras to create a national surveillance network .
The presentation discusses how the Chinese government profits from encouraging companies to use facial recognition on visitors and employees .
In America things are not all that different .
In the United States , the Feds encourage private companies like Clearview AI , Amazon Ring and Flock Safety to use facial recognition and automatic license plate readers to identify everyone .
Under the section “ State @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the presentation extols China ’ s smart city surveillance saying , “ it turns out that having streets carpeted with cameras is good infrastructure for smart cities as well.
” Americans do not need more government surveillance and we certainly do not need our smart cities carpeted with government surveillance devices .
The NSCAI says , “ mass surveillance is a killer application for deep learning .
As our government applies AI deep learning to things like CCTV cameras , cellphone locations , and license plate readers , a person ’ s entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will use deep learning to accurately guess where you work , eat , shop , sleep , worship and vacation .
Basically , mass surveillance is a killer application for knowing all there is to know about everyone .
Last week MLlive , revealed that a startup AI company co-founded by the University of Michigan is helping governments use CCTV cameras to monitor people for social distancing as indicated by a professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Michigan ( UM ) : Police in New York City use CCTV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1,000 for not social distancing .
While police in Florida set up checkpoints on highways and police in the United Kingdom use CCTV cameras to enforce stay-at-home orders .
Voxel51 uses their “ physical distancing index ” to track social distancing in major cities around the globe .
Voxel51 is tracking the impact of the coronavirus global pandemic on social behavior , using a metric we developed called the Voxel51 Physical Distancing Index ( PDI ) .
The PDI helps people understand how the coronavirus is changing human activity in real-time around the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ models and live video streams from some of the most visited streets in the world , the PDI captures the average amount of human activity and social distancing behaviors in major cities over time .
What worries me is how law enforcement might use Voxel51 to fine or arrest people for not observing government-mandated social distancing .
Despite what Voxel51 claims about anonymizing identifiable data , they are still collecting their data from public/government cameras .
A 2019 article in the Michigan News University of Michigan revealed that Voxel51 uses artificial intelligence to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I find it hard to believe that cities and governments would pay money to simply look at anonymized data .
Especially when Voxel51 ’ s business model is built around identifying people and objects on a mass-scale .
A perfect example of how the Feds view mass surveillance can best be summed up in the NSCAI presentation , “ American companies have a lot to gain by adopting ideas from Chinese companies.
” Every day , it seems Americans are being told we need more national surveillance programs to keep everyone safe .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone is only going to grow as the coronavirus grips the country .
It is our job to keep these surveillance programs from being implemented or risk becoming an authoritarian state like China .

By MassPrivateI
A FOIA request by the Electronic Privacy Information Center revealed how excited the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) is about using CCTV cameras to create a national surveillance network.
An NSCAI presentation titled “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview” discusses China’s facial recognition CCTV camera network in glowing terms.
When we talk about data resources, really the largest data source is the government.
The presentation discusses how the Chinese government profits from encouraging companies to use facial recognition on visitors and employees.
Now that these companies are operating at scale they are building a host of other services (e.g. facial recognition for office buildings, augmented reality).
In America things are not all that different.
In the United States, the Feds encourage private companies like Clearview AI, Amazon Ring and Flock Safety to use facial recognition and automatic license plate readers to identify everyone.
Under the section “State Datasets: Surveillance = Smart Cities” the presentation extols China’s smart city surveillance saying, “it turns out that having streets carpeted with cameras is good infrastructure for smart cities as well.”
Americans do not need more government surveillance and we certainly do not need our smart cities carpeted with government surveillance devices.
The NSCAI says, “mass surveillance is a killer application for deep learning.
As our government applies AI deep learning to things like CCTV cameras, cellphone locations, and license plate readers, a person’s entire life can be predicted.
Artificial intelligence will use deep learning to accurately guess where you work, eat, shop, sleep, worship and vacation. Basically, mass surveillance is a killer application for knowing all there is to know about everyone.
Last week MLlive, revealed that a startup AI company co-founded by the University of Michigan is helping governments use CCTV cameras to monitor people for social distancing as indicated by a professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Michigan (UM):
Two weeks ago, Corso said he and his team began tracking physical distancing at locations like Times Square in New York, Miami Beach, Abbey Road in London and the Ruthven Museums Building at UM.
Police in New York City use CCTV cameras to fine people up to $1,000 for not social distancing. While police in Florida set up checkpoints on highways and police in the United Kingdom use CCTV cameras to enforce stay-at-home orders.
Voxel51 uses their “physical distancing index” to track social distancing in major cities around the globe.
Voxel51 is tracking the impact of the coronavirus global pandemic on social behavior, using a metric we developed called the Voxel51 Physical Distancing Index (PDI). The PDI helps people understand how the coronavirus is changing human activity in real-time around the world. Using our cutting-edge computer vision models and live video streams from some of the most visited streets in the world, the PDI captures the average amount of human activity and social distancing behaviors in major cities over time.
What worries me is how law enforcement might use Voxel51 to fine or arrest people for not observing government-mandated social distancing.
Despite what Voxel51 claims about anonymizing identifiable data, they are still collecting their data from public/government cameras.
A 2019 article in the Michigan News University of Michigan revealed that Voxel51 uses artificial intelligence to identify and follow people and objects.
Voxel51 has set out to overcome those obstacles with their video analytics platform and open source software libraries that, together, enable state-of-the-art video recognition. It identifies and follows objects and actions in each clip. As co-founder Brian Moore says, We transform video into value.
I find it hard to believe that cities and governments would pay money to simply look at anonymized data. Especially when Voxel51’s business model is built around identifying people and objects on a mass-scale.
A perfect example of how the Feds view mass surveillance can best be summed up in the NSCAI presentation, “American companies have a lot to gain by adopting ideas from Chinese companies.”
Every day, it seems Americans are being told we need more national surveillance programs to keep everyone safe.
Our government’s obsession with monitoring everyone is only going to grow as the coronavirus grips the country. It is our job to keep these surveillance programs from being implemented or risk becoming an authoritarian state like China.
Source: MassPrivateI Blog
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-04-14--Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

This document was allegedly found July 7th , 1986 by a Boeing employee .
While I do not consider it @ @ @ @ @ of “ the elite , ” I do think it lays out their plan fairly @ @ @ @ @ merely a means to an end .
The means is knowledge .
The end is @ @ @ @ @ only one issue : Who will be the beneficiary ?

This document was allegedly found July 7th, 1986 by a Boeing employee. While I do not consider it to be a genuine document of “the elite,” I do think it lays out their plan fairly well.
All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Beyond this remains only one issue: Who will be the beneficiary?
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


Stalin’s Secret Police

Stalin ruled Eastern Europe by using state-sponsored terrorism , employing his secret police force to spy on , intimidate , @ @ @ @ @ to Communist control .
From “ Monster : A Portrait of Stalin in Blood ” @ @ @ @ @ 1991 Executive producer : Alexander Ivankin International producer : Maya Toidze Directed by : Alexander @

Stalin ruled Eastern Europe by using state-sponsored terrorism, employing his secret police force to spy on, intimidate, and murder any possible threat to Communist control.
From “Monster: A Portrait of Stalin in Blood” (5 part mini-series) 1991
Executive producer: Alexander Ivankin
International producer: Maya Toidze
Directed by: Alexander Ivankin
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt