renegadetribune--2020-03-01--What’s in Children’s Drinking Water? Far Too Often, Something Neurotoxic

Hollywood seems to love a good David versus corporate Goliath tale , and the stories it brings to the silver screen not infrequently revolve around real-life contamination of community water .
Twenty years ago , the film Erin Brockovich called attention to a cancer-causing chemical dumped in a California community by Pacific Gas & Electric , while the recent film Dark Waters focuses on DuPont ’ s contamination of a West Virginia town ’ s water with the chemical PFOA ( perfluorooctanoic acid ) .
Outside of Tinseltown , occurrences such as the 2014 lead debacle in Flint , Michigan—and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s cognition and behavior—have helped ensure that water-quality-related incidents continue to get occasional media attention .
PFOA belongs to a wider family of chemicals called PFAS ( per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ) .
The scientific evidence clearly indicates that drinking water contaminants such as PFAS , lead and many others—as well as the fluoride that , incredibly , is intentionally added to drinking water—are not doing anyone any good .
However , these exposures are of particular concern for children .
This is because growing children drink more water than adults ( per @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exquisitely vulnerable to adverse developmental effects .
As the Environmental Working Group ( EWG ) points out , “ A baby fed exclusively powdered formula mixed with tap water drinks the most water for its small size of any age group ” ; in this scenario , tap water may represent up to 85 % of a formula-fed baby ’ s diet .
Water systems in many of the nation ’ s largest cities routinely violate Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) safety standards for drinking water .
This observation was confirmed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from close to 50,000 water companies and utilities nationwide ( 2010-2015 ) , which found over 250 tap water contaminants and identified studies linking many of these chemicals to cancer ; brain and nervous system damage ; fetal toxicity ; impaired fertility ; and hormone disruption .
EWG concluded that millions of American children are exposed to unsafe levels of contaminants in municipal water supplies ( with an unknown number of children exposed via unmonitored private wells ) —and in this context , even “ a passing grade from the federal government ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in manufacturing and consumer products , are one of the more well-documented and worrisome drinking water contaminants .
Environmental groups have dubbed PFAS “ forever chemicals ” because they resist degradation and build up in the blood and organs .
Although other routes of exposure ( such as food , house dust and indoor air ) are also significant , the chemicals ’ “ extremely durable ” and water-soluble properties have facilitated widespread PFAS infiltration of community water supplies and private wells around the world , even in the most remote areas .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ tap water have increased significantly since the late 1980s .
Research shows that virtually everyone on the planet now harbors PFAS in their bloodstream .
One nationally representative U.S. study detected the compounds in the blood of 99 % of American adults and adolescents age 12 and up .
Although some countries have banned or begun to phase out certain PFAS compounds , the chemicals ’ propensity to bioaccumulate—and the continued or increased use of other PFAS compounds—means that the PFAS body burden remains high .
For children , the implications of PFAS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ range of potential effects that may begin in utero and continue into adulthood .
Possible adverse outcomes include : • Effects on levels of sex hormones and insulin-like growth factor 1 , both of which play a critical role in growth and sexual maturation Lead is another persistent substance that lingers without breaking down .
Although the U.S. banned lead-based paints in the late 1970s and leaded gasoline in the mid-1990s , lead components of water delivery systems continue to constitute an environmental and health disaster .
Government toxicologists describe lead as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system , ” and especially the developing brain .
There is no safe threshold for lead exposure .
In 2016 , a USA Today analysis of EPA data found that the agency had detected lead levels in excess of EPA standards in almost 2,000 community water systems from all 50 states , with over a third displaying levels “ more than double the EPA ’ s action level limit ” and many rivaling or exceeding the alarming levels detected in Flint , Michigan .
Some of the highest lead levels were at schools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the “ stunning ” level of lead in the water met the EPA ’ s threshold for hazardous waste .
Moreover , drinking water contamination with brain-damaging lead had often persisted for months or years without redress , and almost one in ten water systems had never notified the public .
Among its many dangerous properties , lead can pass through the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to various regions of the brain linked to neurologic disorders .
In the aftermath of the lead poisoning of Flint ’ s water supply , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proficiency in exposed children , and the proportion of students qualifying for special education services nearly doubled .
A veteran teacher in the Flint school system stated , “ We have a school district where all that ’ s left are damaged kids who are being exposed to other damaged kids , and it ’ s causing more damage , ” while a Flint superintendent reported that the schools “ were bracing for an ‘ evolving , educational emergency.
’ ” Even more concerning , a Reuters analysis later showed that Flint is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s most dangerous “ lead hotspots ” ; Reuters found “ nearly 3,000 areas with recently recorded lead poisoning rates at least double those in Flint during the peak of that city ’ s contamination crisis , ” with blood lead levels at least four times higher than Flint ’ s in more than a third of those communities .
Fluoride stands apart from other water contaminants in that water systems add it to drinking water on purpose .
More Americans drink fluoridated water than in all other countries combined .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an avalanche of evidence that the chemical—an industrial waste product—is lowering IQ and that fluoride produces neurodevelopmental toxicity “ comparable to the effects of lead.
” In addition to effects on cognition , studies have linked fluoride to behavioral symptoms of inattention and diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) as well as to numerous health risks , including an increased risk of bone cancer .
The authors of studies highlighting fluoride ’ s effects on IQ are particularly concerned about the developmental impact of systemic fluoride ingestion and advise pregnant women not to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Pregnancy and Fluoride Do Not Mix , cites hundreds of studies linking fluoride to premature birth ( pointing out that rates of premature birth are “ unusually high ” in the U.S. ) as well as preeclampsia , impaired neurological development and autism .
The ostensible rationale for U.S. water fluoridation—prevention of tooth decay—does not hold up to scrutiny , because tooth decay rates have been steadily declining in countries that have never practiced water fluoridation .
In light of the growing awareness that chemicals can exert greater effects in combination with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s finding that U.S. tap water contains at least 250 contaminants is hardly reassuring .
Studies suggest , for example , that chemicals not found to be cancer-causing on their own “ might act together to promote the process of carcinogenesis.
” Although scientists still tend to study one chemical at a time , there are calls to “ elucidate and define combinatory actions , ” with an entire scientific journal now dedicated to considering “ different dose and effect levels , .
.
.
optimal combination ratios or sequences and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addition , EWG researchers are calling for “ a shift towards aggregate and cumulative assessment of chemical contaminants , ” particularly for drinking water .
Applying a “ cumulative cancer risk framework ” to drinking water data , they reported in 2019 that the national attributable cancer risk due to tap water contaminants was two orders of magnitude higher than the benchmark risk level used by the EPA and other regulatory agencies .
Stated another way , for the 86 % of the U.S. population served by community water systems , tap water @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ equivalent to 4 lifetime cancer cases per 10,000 people ” rather than one case per million .
The researchers also noted that their estimate is likely to be conservative due to missing data for many contaminants that are either unmonitored , infrequently monitored or out of compliance with monitoring and reporting requirements .
Back in 1996 , the Food Quality Protection Act established a requirement that the EPA “ set allowable levels for pesticides in a way that would ‘ ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ” ; the Act also stipulated an additional tenfold margin of safety “ to account for pre- and postnatal toxicity.
” A subsequent analysis found that the EPA had failed to apply the additional margin of safety for the majority of pesticides reviewed .
Unfortunately , the same phenomenon seems to hold true for drinking water contaminants .
One of the important conclusions drawn by EWG and others is that mere compliance with national drinking water standards is far from a guarantee that contaminant levels are safe , especially for children .

Hollywood seems to love a good David versus corporate Goliath tale, and the stories it brings to the silver screen not infrequently revolve around real-life contamination of community water. Twenty years ago, the film Erin Brockovich called attention to a cancer-causing chemical dumped in a California community by Pacific Gas & Electric, while the recent film Dark Waters focuses on DuPont’s contamination of a West Virginia town’s water with the chemical PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid). Outside of Tinseltown, occurrences such as the 2014 lead debacle in Flint, Michigan—and especially its dramatic impact on children’s cognition and behavior—have helped ensure that water-quality-related incidents continue to get occasional media attention.
PFOA belongs to a wider family of chemicals called PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). The scientific evidence clearly indicates that drinking water contaminants such as PFAS, lead and many others—as well as the fluoride that, incredibly, is intentionally added to drinking water—are not doing anyone any good. However, these exposures are of particular concern for children. This is because growing children drink more water than adults (per pound of body weight) and are exquisitely vulnerable to adverse developmental effects. As the Environmental Working Group (EWG) points out, “A baby fed exclusively powdered formula mixed with tap water drinks the most water for its small size of any age group”; in this scenario, tap water may represent up to 85% of a formula-fed baby’s diet.
Water systems in many of the nation’s largest cities routinely violate Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) safety standards for drinking water. This observation was confirmed in a comprehensive EWG review of reports collected from close to 50,000 water companies and utilities nationwide (2010-2015), which found over 250 tap water contaminants and identified studies linking many of these chemicals to cancer; brain and nervous system damage; fetal toxicity; impaired fertility; and hormone disruption. EWG concluded that millions of American children are exposed to unsafe levels of contaminants in municipal water supplies (with an unknown number of children exposed via unmonitored private wells)—and in this context, even “a passing grade from the federal government” means little.
… the chemicals’ extremely durable and water-soluble properties have facilitated widespread PFAS infiltration of community water supplies and private wells around the world, even in the most remote areas.
Pervasive PFAS
PFAS, extensively used in manufacturing and consumer products, are one of the more well-documented and worrisome drinking water contaminants. Environmental groups have dubbed PFAS “forever chemicals” because they resist degradation and build up in the blood and organs. Although other routes of exposure (such as food, house dust and indoor air) are also significant, the chemicals’ “extremely durable” and water-soluble properties have facilitated widespread PFAS infiltration of community water supplies and private wells around the world, even in the most remote areas. In the U.S., PFAS levels in tap water have increased significantly since the late 1980s.
Research shows that virtually everyone on the planet now harbors PFAS in their bloodstream. One nationally representative U.S. study detected the compounds in the blood of 99% of American adults and adolescents age 12 and up. Although some countries have banned or begun to phase out certain PFAS compounds, the chemicals’ propensity to bioaccumulate—and the continued or increased use of other PFAS compounds—means that the PFAS body burden remains high.
For children, the implications of PFAS exposure are profound, with a wide range of potential effects that may begin in utero and continue into adulthood. Possible adverse outcomes include:
[A] USA Today analysis of EPA data found that the agency had detected lead levels in excess of EPA standards in almost 2,000 community water systems from all 50 states, with over a third displaying levels more than double the EPA’s action level limit …
Lingering Lead
Lead is another persistent substance that lingers without breaking down. Although the U.S. banned lead-based paints in the late 1970s and leaded gasoline in the mid-1990s, lead components of water delivery systems continue to constitute an environmental and health disaster. Government toxicologists describe lead as a “systemic toxicant affecting virtually every organ system,” and especially the developing brain. There is no safe threshold for lead exposure.
In 2016, a USA Today analysis of EPA data found that the agency had detected lead levels in excess of EPA standards in almost 2,000 community water systems from all 50 states, with over a third displaying levels “more than double the EPA’s action level limit” and many rivaling or exceeding the alarming levels detected in Flint, Michigan. Some of the highest lead levels were at schools and day care centers—in one elementary school, the “stunning” level of lead in the water met the EPA’s threshold for hazardous waste. Moreover, drinking water contamination with brain-damaging lead had often persisted for months or years without redress, and almost one in ten water systems had never notified the public.
Among its many dangerous properties, lead can pass through the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to various regions of the brain linked to neurologic disorders. In the aftermath of the lead poisoning of Flint’s water supply, the city observed a decline in reading proficiency in exposed children, and the proportion of students qualifying for special education services nearly doubled. A veteran teacher in the Flint school system stated, “We have a school district where all that’s left are damaged kids who are being exposed to other damaged kids, and it’s causing more damage,” while a Flint superintendent reported that the schools “were bracing for an ‘evolving, educational emergency.’” Even more concerning, a Reuters analysis later showed that Flint is far from being one of the nation’s most dangerous “lead hotspots”; Reuters found “nearly 3,000 areas with recently recorded lead poisoning rates at least double those in Flint during the peak of that city’s contamination crisis,” with blood lead levels at least four times higher than Flint’s in more than a third of those communities.
This CDC-endorsed practice has persisted for decades despite an avalanche of evidence that the chemical—an industrial waste product—is lowering IQ and that fluoride produces neurodevelopmental toxicity comparable to the effects of lead.
Flagrantly unjustifiable fluoride
Fluoride stands apart from other water contaminants in that water systems add it to drinking water on purpose. More Americans drink fluoridated water than in all other countries combined. This CDC-endorsed practice has persisted for decades despite an avalanche of evidence that the chemical—an industrial waste product—is lowering IQ and that fluoride produces neurodevelopmental toxicity “comparable to the effects of lead.” In addition to effects on cognition, studies have linked fluoride to behavioral symptoms of inattention and diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as to numerous health risks, including an increased risk of bone cancer.
The authors of studies highlighting fluoride’s effects on IQ are particularly concerned about the developmental impact of systemic fluoride ingestion and advise pregnant women not to drink fluoridated water. The 2017 book, Pregnancy and Fluoride Do Not Mix, cites hundreds of studies linking fluoride to premature birth (pointing out that rates of premature birth are “unusually high” in the U.S.) as well as preeclampsia, impaired neurological development and autism. The ostensible rationale for U.S. water fluoridation—prevention of tooth decay—does not hold up to scrutiny, because tooth decay rates have been steadily declining in countries that have never practiced water fluoridation.
…mere compliance with national drinking water standards is far from a guarantee that contaminant levels are safe, especially for children.
Chemicals in combination
In light of the growing awareness that chemicals can exert greater effects in combination with other chemicals—a principle known as synergy—the EWG’s finding that U.S. tap water contains at least 250 contaminants is hardly reassuring. Studies suggest, for example, that chemicals not found to be cancer-causing on their own “might act together to promote the process of carcinogenesis.” Although scientists still tend to study one chemical at a time, there are calls to “elucidate and define combinatory actions,” with an entire scientific journal now dedicated to considering “different dose and effect levels, . . . optimal combination ratios or sequences and the prevention of potential adverse events.”
In addition, EWG researchers are calling for “a shift towards aggregate and cumulative assessment of chemical contaminants,” particularly for drinking water. Applying a “cumulative cancer risk framework” to drinking water data, they reported in 2019 that the national attributable cancer risk due to tap water contaminants was two orders of magnitude higher than the benchmark risk level used by the EPA and other regulatory agencies. Stated another way, for the 86% of the U.S. population served by community water systems, tap water contaminants accounted for a cumulative lifetime risk “equivalent to 4 lifetime cancer cases per 10,000 people” rather than one case per million. The researchers also noted that their estimate is likely to be conservative due to missing data for many contaminants that are either unmonitored, infrequently monitored or out of compliance with monitoring and reporting requirements.
Back in 1996, the Food Quality Protection Act established a requirement that the EPA “set allowable levels for pesticides in a way that would ‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure’”; the Act also stipulated an additional tenfold margin of safety “to account for pre- and postnatal toxicity.” A subsequent analysis found that the EPA had failed to apply the additional margin of safety for the majority of pesticides reviewed. Unfortunately, the same phenomenon seems to hold true for drinking water contaminants. One of the important conclusions drawn by EWG and others is that mere compliance with national drinking water standards is far from a guarantee that contaminant levels are safe, especially for children.
This article originally appeared on Children’s Health Defense.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-02--It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt4

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt4

Note- “ IT ’ S A HOLOHOAX ( don ’ t be fooled ) ” are series of blog posts that thoroughly expose the Jewish Holocaust lie .
There were “ Nazi Death Camps ” and “ Nazi Gas Chambers ” .
You have been fooled !
This is your opportunity to break free of the mind control you have been taught in school and in the media .
You have been deceived !
We all have… but never again .
It has been said that it is easier to believe a lie one has heard a hundred times , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before .
We have heard 6 million lies about the “ Holocaust ” .
The truth about the Holohoax has been hidden .
Read below to uncover the cover-up !
Note : This blog series is derived from “ Did Six Million Really Die ?
” book by Richard E. Harwood ( 1974 ) with many additional sources , originally presented in DJ Noble Protagonist ’ s E-book ( The Battle to preserve Western Civilization ) : https : //archive.org/details/ @ nobleprotagonist Holocaust ( Holohoax ) survivors report that at least 700,000 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , people primarily of Jewish faith were murdered in the Treblinka camp , located in Eastern Poland , between the summers of 1942 and 1943 .
Their bodies were alleged to have been buried in mass graves .
Various murder weapons are claimed , yet no forensic evidence provided to have been used ; mobile or stationary gas chambers , quicklime , hot steam , high voltage electricity , machine guns , vacuum chambers , chlorine gas , Zyklon B and diesel exhaust gas .
The “ eyewitness ” testimony & accounts that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group of camps , are completely contradictory of each other .
The witness claims diverge so widely ; not only where the numbers of victims are concerned , but also with respect to the alleged methods of killing , about the way the bodies and evidence were eliminated , and about the location , size , form and equipment of the alleged extermination camp , that it is impossible to cull a plausible overall account .
No evidence of victims has ever surfaced .
The elimination of victims without a trace is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the Holocaust ( Holohoax ) in general .
Elimination without a trace is the prerequisite for an arbitrary number of victims .
This is how the numbers of victims alleged for Treblinka come to vary from 700,000 to 3 million , a phenomenon that also appears in other Holohoax-related cases .
The technically unrealistic claims regarding the mass murder of human beings are compounded by the utterly unbelievable accounts of the removal of bodies without any trace .
Millions of dead can not simply vanish into thin air .
A detailed forensic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sophisticated electronic ground radar , has found “ no evidence ” of mass graves there .
For six days in October 1999 , an Australian forensics team headed by Richard Krege , a qualified electronics engineer , carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland .
According to Krege , “ Historians say that the bodies were exhumed & cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp ’ s use in 1943 , but we found no indication that any mass graves ever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1944 of the Treblinka camp also cast serious doubts on the widely accepted Holohoax story that Treblinka was a mass extermination center .
Discovered in 1989 in the National Archives in Washington , D.C. , these photographs corroborate other evidence indicating that Treblinka was actually a transit camp .
The photographs indicate that Treblinka was an extremely small camp .
The camp ’ s burial area is too small to contain the hundreds of thousands of bodies supposedly buried there .
Treblinka was not particularly well guarded or isolated .
The aerial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planted & cultivated crops were directly adjacent to the camp perimeter , and were cultivated right up to the edge of the camp .
John C. Ball , a geologist with experience interpreting aerial photographs , has reviewed the wartime aerial photos taken of Treblinka , Belzec and Sobibor .
Ball concludes , “ To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at ‘ any location ’ in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two .
Further , air photo analysis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ had intended , at whatever time , to keep events , in the alleged extermination camps , secret.
” Walter Luftl , a court-recognized expert engineer who headed a large engineering firm in Vienna , concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with diesel engines & gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation .
Luftl stated , “ The laws of nature apply both to Nazis and anti-Fascists .
Nobody can be killed with ‘ diesel exhaust gas ’ in the manner described ( in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is no compelling evidence that the Aktion Reinhardt camps , of Bełzec , Sobibor and Treblinka , were extermination centers in which Jews were systematically put to death .
The Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps rather than extermination camps .
The demographic studies , the numerous statements from Heinrich Himmler , the reports of transfers of Jews from the Aktion Reinhardt camps to Auschwitz & Majdanek , the lack of credible forensic evidence that mass exterminations occurred at the camps , the photographic and engineering evidence , the impossibility of disposing of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ period of time , the relative lack of secrecy & security in the camps , and the small size of the areas where the bodies were supposedly buried all indicate that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps .
In 1941 , British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “ Enigma ” code , with the probable secret assistance of traitors within the German aristocratic class .
This undermined the German war effort , but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the National Socialist concentration camp system .
Between January 1942 and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted & decrypted .
To keep the Holohoax going , historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to “ arrivals ” , “ departures ” , recorded deaths and other events at these camps .
The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted “ Enigma ” code data seriously contradicts , even refutes , the orthodox “ Holocaust ” ( Holohoax ) narrative .
The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder & racial genocide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the Germans were determined , even desperate , to reduce the death rate in their work camps , which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics .
Note : Operation Ultra was the codename for the British cryptologists efforts at Bletchley Park to intercept & break German coded messages .
While Ultra initially was the cryptonym for the project to break the German Enigma machine , the code name came to represent all British efforts to break high-level German radio codes during World War 2 .
Note : In 1943 , the British @ @ @ @ @ @ @ naval activities .
Steven Spielberg ’ s mendacious ( lying ) anti-German libel , “ Schindler ’ s List , ” is based upon a novel , a work of fiction , titled in its first edition , “ Schindler ’ s Ark ” , by the Australian writer , Thomas Keneally .
Keneally ’ s work is riddled with errors and “ Holocaust ” extermination narratives .
There are certain aspects of Keneally ’ s book that Spielberg omitted from the movie .
Keneally mentioned that Schindler worked for the powerful Hungarian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this information be found in the “ Schindler ’ s List ” movie , because in 1944 , Kastner helped Eichmann deport hundreds of thousands of Jews to Auschwitz , in return for favorable treatment for Kastner ’ s Zionist cronies .
The fact of high level cooperation between National Socialists & Zionists was too embarrassing to be included in Spielberg ’ s pro-Zionist film .
There are many instances of attempts by the German military to secure humane conditions within the concentration camps .
For example , in 1943 , SS Judge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( SS-HAG ) was assigned to investigate and prosecute brutality at Buchenwald .
Morgen was so successful in correcting conditions there that Heinrich Himmler gave him an expanded staff and unlimited investigative authority in the camps .
Morgen ’ s next target of inquiry was Krakau-Plaszow and its commandant , Amon Goeth , the arch-fiend of Speilberg ’ s film .
In “ Schindler ’ s List ” , Morgen ’ s entire investigation of Goeth was reduced to a scene in which fleeting reference is made to Goeth having his books “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Steven Spielberg intentionally withheld from his gullible audience is that in September of 1944 , Goeth was arrested by the Central Office of the SS Judiciary and imprisoned on charges of theft and the murder of concentration camp inmates .
Spielberg was certainly aware of this fact , since the arrest is mentioned in Chapter 31 of Keneally ’ s book , upon which the movie is allegedly based .
Spielberg whitewashes the guilt of the Ordnungdienst ( OD ) , the Jewish ghetto police , who worked for the National Socialists .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Germans control Jewish crowds , their main role in the movie is that of bystanders & traffic monitors .
In real life however , many OD were ruthless killers .
Toward the end of the movie , Schindler is shown being presented with an inscribed gold ring by the Jews he rescued .
We are told that the inscription is from the Talmud , “ He who saves a single life , saves the entire world.
” The saying has a nice , warm , humanistic tenor , but that ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actual Talmud verse states , “ Whosoever preserves a single soul ( a Jew ) of Israel , Scripture ascribes to him as if he had preserved a complete world ” ( Tractate Sanhedrin 37a ) .
The Talmud only praises the saving of Jewish lives .
In Spielberg ’ s non-stop Hollywood deception , even the documented contents of sacred Jewish texts are falsified .
Much has been made of the supposed “ conciliatory nature ” of Schindler ’ s List because it shows exactly two Germans , the Schindler couple , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ member of the German military as either a monster or a homicidal robot .
The perpetuation of this false stereotype constitutes “ hate ” propaganda , and is anti-White .
“ Schindler ’ s List ” is more sophisticated than other “ Holocaust ” propaganda films , having been crafted by the most successful director in Hollywood , who is clever enough to give his villains some characteristics of self-doubt , complaint and fatigue .
But the film is nonetheless historically fraudulent .
It is fiction !
This film has been shown in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ West and is portrayed as historically accurate .
This is pure Zionist-occupied government propaganda that needs to be debunked and thrown in the garbage , along with other anti-White Hollywood trash , like Inglourious Basterds & Django Unchained .
Of the many Jewish ( fictional ) memoirs that present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism , the most celebrated is undoubtedly the Anne Frank Diary and the truth concerning this book provides insight into how a propaganda legend is fabricated and cashed in .
Tucked away on pages @ @ @ @ @ @ @ issue of Der Spiegel , a weekly German news magazine comparable to Time or Newsweek , was a news item of considerable significance .
A scientific analysis of the manuscript purported to be the original diary of Anne Frank , a Jewish girl who died in a German concentration camp during the Second World War , has revealed that the manuscript could not have been written before 1951 , six years after the end of the war .
The exposure of the Anne Frank forgery is important because of the sheer magnitude of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has played in underpinning the entire Jewish scenario of the war .
What is known as a fact is that Otto Frank , a Jewish merchant , formerly of Frankfurt , who had been arrested in the Netherlands and interned in the Auschwitz concentration camp during the war , began visiting publishers in 1946 with what he claimed was a diary written by his young daughter during the time the Frank family was hiding from the German police in occupied Holland .
The girl later perished at Auschwitz , Frank said .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and homely little anecdotes , was exactly what the Jewish “ Holocaust ” propagandists were looking for , in order to generate tearfully sentimental & emotion-laden sympathy for the “ persecuted ” Jews , as typified by Anne Frank , and generate hatred against the wicked Germans , who had killed her and “ Six Million ” other Jews .
Otto Frank cashed in on the diary in a big way .
Not only did he find a publisher , but he found people hot to buy stage & film rights as well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form , the diary had been translated into a score of languages and printed in millions of copies , from all of which Frank received royalties .
The English version alone , under the title “ Anne Frank : The Diary of a Young Girl ” , has sold more than 4,000,000 copies to date .
A television dramatization based on the diary was aired in the United States as well .
Almost from the beginning there were charges that the diary was a hoax .
Some of these charges were based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ editions of the diary in book form ; it was clear that the text had been heavily edited to help it sell well in different international markets .
Other charges were based on internal inconsistencies and credulity-straining elements in the diary itself .
Otto Frank was sued by a New York scriptwriter , Meyer Levin , who claimed that Frank had taken large portions of a script that he had written and had not paid Levin for his work .
The court ordered Frank to pay Levin $ 50,000 .
One can easily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how much , if any , of the content of the various Anne Frank books , films , and plays in circulation was actually written by a little Jewish girl named Anne Frank .
When Hamburg pensioner , Ernst Roemer , age 76 , began spreading the accusation that Otto Frank had himself written what he was passing off as his dead daughter ’ s diary , Frank sued him .
As usual , the German court upheld the authenticity of the diary .
Handwriting experts testified that the entire diary , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ written by the same hand , and that hand was Anne Frank ’ s .
Roemer appealed the court ’ s decision against him , and more handwriting experts were called in .
Their conclusion was the same ; everything in the diary was in the same handwriting ; there was no forgery .
Roemer appealed again , and this time the court asked for the technical services of the Federal Criminal Office , the Bundeskriminalamt , which carried out a careful analysis of the original manuscript of the diary with microscope & @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authenticity , and determine when it was written .
The report of the technical experts was given to the court and it contained a bombshell ; large portions of the alleged “ diary ” were written in ballpoint pen ink , which was not manufactured prior to 1951 .
Were it not for the previous testimony of the handwriting experts that the entire diary , including the portions written with ballpoint pen , is in the same hand , the father might have claimed that he only “ edited ” his daughter ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here and there .
But the evidence was quite unambiguous .
It is now quite clear that Otto finished up the “ original ” of the diary after he had found a publisher in 1946 .
At that time , his original was nothing more than some rough notes and an idea in his head , which seemed to have prospects for making him a lot of money with little effort .
First a typescript for the publisher , and then , as sales of the book began to mount , a completed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubters .
Just after the report of the Federal Criminal Office was given to the court , Otto Frank conveniently died , before he could be asked a number of very interesting questions .
Meanwhile , the worldwide Jewish propaganda apparatus has continued its promotion of the Anne Frank myth as if nothing had happened .
Der Spiegel seems to be the only mass-circulation news periodical to have exposed the fraud to date .
QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ASKED In his book , “ Adolf Hitler ” , the author , Colin Cross @ @ @ @ @ @ @ usual to the many problems of this period of history , observed astutely that “ the shuffling of millions of Jews around Europe and murdering them , in a time of desperate war emergency , was useless from any rational point of view.
” Is it likely , that , at the height of the war , when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts , they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses ?
To have conveyed three or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities , which were already strained to the limit supporting the far-flung Russian front .
To have transported the mythical Six Million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps , and to have housed , clothed and fed them there , would simply have paralyzed their military operations .
There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk .
On the other hand , the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have been registered there , to Auschwitz in the course of the war , at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied to assist the war effort .
In fact , of the 3 million Jewish people living in German-occupied Europe , it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time , and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000 .
Per the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross , whole Jewish populations , such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in camps , while others were placed in community ghettos like Theresienstadt .
Moreover , from Western Europe deportations were far fewer .
Another question that must also be asked is how can millions of Jewish people be eliminated without a trace in six months ?
Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret ?
These are the kind of questions that the critical , thinking person should ask .
And he will soon discover that not only the statistical & documentary evidence known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million .
Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them , the nature & conditions of Germany ’ s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible .

Note- “IT’S A HOLOHOAX (don’t be fooled)” are series of blog posts that thoroughly expose the Jewish Holocaust lie. There were no “Nazi Death Camps” and no “Nazi Gas Chambers”. You have been fooled! This is your opportunity to break free of the mind control you have been taught in school and in the media. You have been deceived! We all have… but never again.
It has been said that it is easier to believe a lie one has heard a hundred times, than a truth one has never heard before. We have heard 6 million lies about the “Holocaust”. The truth about the Holohoax has been hidden. Read below to uncover the cover-up!
Note: This blog series is derived from “Did Six Million Really Die?” book by Richard E. Harwood (1974) with many additional sources, originally presented in DJ Noble Protagonist’s E-book (The Battle to preserve Western Civilization): https://archive.org/details/@nobleprotagonist
Note: Core reference material: https://holocausthandbooks.com/
Also in German: http://holocausthandbuecher.com/
TREBLINKA WAS A TRANSIT CAMP
Holocaust (Holohoax) survivors report that at least 700,000, and perhaps as many as three million, people primarily of Jewish faith were murdered in the Treblinka camp, located in Eastern Poland, between the summers of 1942 and 1943. Their bodies were alleged to have been buried in mass graves.
Various murder weapons are claimed, yet no forensic evidence provided to have been used; mobile or stationary gas chambers, quicklime, hot steam, high voltage electricity, machine guns, vacuum chambers, chlorine gas, Zyklon B and diesel exhaust gas.
The “eyewitness” testimony & accounts that exist, in regard to the Treblinka group of camps, are completely contradictory of each other. The witness claims diverge so widely; not only where the numbers of victims are concerned, but also with respect to the alleged methods of killing, about the way the bodies and evidence were eliminated, and about the location, size, form and equipment of the alleged extermination camp, that it is impossible to cull a plausible overall account.
No evidence of victims has ever surfaced. The elimination of victims without a trace is a vital link in the chain of evidence for the Holocaust (Holohoax) in general. Elimination without a trace is the prerequisite for an arbitrary number of victims. This is how the numbers of victims alleged for Treblinka come to vary from 700,000 to 3 million, a phenomenon that also appears in other Holohoax-related cases.
The technically unrealistic claims regarding the mass murder of human beings are compounded by the utterly unbelievable accounts of the removal of bodies without any trace. Millions of dead cannot simply vanish into thin air.
A detailed forensic examination of the Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, has found “no evidence” of mass graves there. For six days in October 1999, an Australian forensics team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland.
According to Krege, “Historians say that the bodies were exhumed & cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp’s use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed.”
German aerial reconnaissance photographs taken in 1944 of the Treblinka camp also cast serious doubts on the widely accepted Holohoax story that Treblinka was a mass extermination center. Discovered in 1989 in the National Archives in Washington, D.C., these photographs corroborate other evidence indicating that Treblinka was actually a transit camp.
The photographs indicate that Treblinka was an extremely small camp. The camp’s burial area is too small to contain the hundreds of thousands of bodies supposedly buried there. Treblinka was not particularly well guarded or isolated. The aerial photographs show that fields where Polish farmers planted & cultivated crops were directly adjacent to the camp perimeter, and were cultivated right up to the edge of the camp.
John C. Ball, a geologist with experience interpreting aerial photographs, has reviewed the wartime aerial photos taken of Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor. Ball concludes, “To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at ‘any location’ in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two. Further, air photo analysis refutes the claim that the ‘Nazis’ had intended, at whatever time, to keep events, in the alleged extermination camps, secret.”
Walter Luftl, a court-recognized expert engineer who headed a large engineering firm in Vienna, concludes in his report that the stories of gas chambers with diesel engines & gas vans at places such as Treblinka can only be disinformation. Luftl stated, “The laws of nature apply both to Nazis and anti-Fascists. Nobody can be killed with ‘diesel exhaust gas’ in the manner described (in the Holocaust literature).”
There is no compelling evidence that the Aktion Reinhardt camps, of Bełzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, were extermination centers in which Jews were systematically put to death.
The Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps rather than extermination camps. The demographic studies, the numerous statements from Heinrich Himmler, the reports of transfers of Jews from the Aktion Reinhardt camps to Auschwitz & Majdanek, the lack of credible forensic evidence that mass exterminations occurred at the camps, the photographic and engineering evidence, the impossibility of disposing of so many bodies in such a short period of time, the relative lack of secrecy & security in the camps, and the small size of the areas where the bodies were supposedly buried all indicate that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps.
“ENIGMA” CODE CRACKED
In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” code, with the probable secret assistance of traitors within the German aristocratic class. This undermined the German war effort, but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the National Socialist concentration camp system.
Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted & decrypted. To keep the Holohoax going, historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to “arrivals”, “departures”, recorded deaths and other events at these camps.
The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted “Enigma” code data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox “Holocaust” (Holohoax) narrative. The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder & racial genocide. Quite the opposite; it reveals that the Germans were determined, even desperate, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics.
Note: Operation Ultra was the codename for the British cryptologists efforts at Bletchley Park to intercept & break German coded messages. While Ultra initially was the cryptonym for the project to break the German Enigma machine, the code name came to represent all British efforts to break high-level German radio codes during World War 2.
Note: In 1943, the British finally cracked the code to access German naval activities.
SCHINDLER’S LIST IS FICTION
Steven Spielberg’s mendacious (lying) anti-German libel, “Schindler’s List,” is based upon a novel, a work of fiction, titled in its first edition, “Schindler’s Ark”, by the Australian writer, Thomas Keneally. Keneally’s work is riddled with errors and “Holocaust” extermination narratives. There are certain aspects of Keneally’s book that Spielberg omitted from the movie. Keneally mentioned that Schindler worked for the powerful Hungarian Jew, Rudolf Kastner.
Nowhere will this information be found in the “Schindler’s List” movie, because in 1944, Kastner helped Eichmann deport hundreds of thousands of Jews to Auschwitz, in return for favorable treatment for Kastner’s Zionist cronies. The fact of high level cooperation between National Socialists & Zionists was too embarrassing to be included in Spielberg’s pro-Zionist film.
There are many instances of attempts by the German military to secure humane conditions within the concentration camps.
For example, in 1943, SS Judge Konrad Morgen of the Haupt Amt Gericht (SS-HAG) was assigned to investigate and prosecute brutality at Buchenwald. Morgen was so successful in correcting conditions there that Heinrich Himmler gave him an expanded staff and unlimited investigative authority in the camps. Morgen’s next target of inquiry was Krakau-Plaszow and its commandant, Amon Goeth, the arch-fiend of Speilberg’s film.
In “Schindler’s List”, Morgen’s entire investigation of Goeth was reduced to a scene in which fleeting reference is made to Goeth having his books “audited”.
The crucial truth that Steven Spielberg intentionally withheld from his gullible audience is that in September of 1944, Goeth was arrested by the Central Office of the SS Judiciary and imprisoned on charges of theft and the murder of concentration camp inmates. Spielberg was certainly aware of this fact, since the arrest is mentioned in Chapter 31 of Keneally’s book, upon which the movie is allegedly based.
Spielberg whitewashes the guilt of the Ordnungdienst (OD), the Jewish ghetto police, who worked for the National Socialists. Though occasionally shown taking bribes and helping the Germans control Jewish crowds, their main role in the movie is that of bystanders & traffic monitors. In real life however, many OD were ruthless killers.
Toward the end of the movie, Schindler is shown being presented with an inscribed gold ring by the Jews he rescued. We are told that the inscription is from the Talmud, “He who saves a single life, saves the entire world.” The saying has a nice, warm, humanistic tenor, but that’s not what the Talmud says.
The actual Talmud verse states, “Whosoever preserves a single soul (a Jew) of Israel, Scripture ascribes to him as if he had preserved a complete world” (Tractate Sanhedrin 37a). The Talmud only praises the saving of Jewish lives. In Spielberg’s non-stop Hollywood deception, even the documented contents of sacred Jewish texts are falsified.
Much has been made of the supposed “conciliatory nature” of Schindler’s List because it shows exactly two Germans, the Schindler couple, acting decently. However it depicts every member of the German military as either a monster or a homicidal robot. The perpetuation of this false stereotype constitutes “hate” propaganda, and is anti-White.
“Schindler’s List” is more sophisticated than other “Holocaust” propaganda films, having been crafted by the most successful director in Hollywood, who is clever enough to give his villains some characteristics of self-doubt, complaint and fatigue. But the film is nonetheless historically fraudulent. It is fiction!
This film has been shown in many children’s classrooms in the West and is portrayed as historically accurate. This is pure Zionist-occupied government propaganda that needs to be debunked and thrown in the garbage, along with other anti-White Hollywood trash, like Inglourious Basterds & Django Unchained.
ANNE FRANK BEST-SELLER IS A FRAUD
Of the many Jewish (fictional) memoirs that present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly the Anne Frank Diary and the truth concerning this book provides insight into how a propaganda legend is fabricated and cashed in.
Tucked away on pages 119 and 122 of the October 6th issue of Der Spiegel, a weekly German news magazine comparable to Time or Newsweek, was a news item of considerable significance. A scientific analysis of the manuscript purported to be the original diary of Anne Frank, a Jewish girl who died in a German concentration camp during the Second World War, has revealed that the manuscript could not have been written before 1951, six years after the end of the war.
The exposure of the Anne Frank forgery is important because of the sheer magnitude of the fraud and the key role it has played in underpinning the entire Jewish scenario of the war. What is known as a fact is that Otto Frank, a Jewish merchant, formerly of Frankfurt, who had been arrested in the Netherlands and interned in the Auschwitz concentration camp during the war, began visiting publishers in 1946 with what he claimed was a diary written by his young daughter during the time the Frank family was hiding from the German police in occupied Holland. The girl later perished at Auschwitz, Frank said.
The diary, filled with touching adolescent reveries and homely little anecdotes, was exactly what the Jewish “Holocaust” propagandists were looking for, in order to generate tearfully sentimental & emotion-laden sympathy for the “persecuted” Jews, as typified by Anne Frank, and generate hatred against the wicked Germans, who had killed her and “Six Million” other Jews.
Otto Frank cashed in on the diary in a big way. Not only did he find a publisher, but he found people hot to buy stage & film rights as well. Shortly after its appearance in book form, the diary had been translated into a score of languages and printed in millions of copies, from all of which Frank received royalties. The English version alone, under the title “Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl”, has sold more than 4,000,000 copies to date. A television dramatization based on the diary was aired in the United States as well.
Almost from the beginning there were charges that the diary was a hoax. Some of these charges were based on the gross inconsistencies between various translations & editions of the diary in book form; it was clear that the text had been heavily edited to help it sell well in different international markets. Other charges were based on internal inconsistencies and credulity-straining elements in the diary itself.
Otto Frank was sued by a New York scriptwriter, Meyer Levin, who claimed that Frank had taken large portions of a script that he had written and had not paid Levin for his work. The court ordered Frank to pay Levin $50,000. One can easily understand why some observers began to wonder how much, if any, of the content of the various Anne Frank books, films, and plays in circulation was actually written by a little Jewish girl named Anne Frank.
When Hamburg pensioner, Ernst Roemer, age 76, began spreading the accusation that Otto Frank had himself written what he was passing off as his dead daughter’s diary, Frank sued him. As usual, the German court upheld the authenticity of the diary. Handwriting experts testified that the entire diary, including loose notes & insertions, had been written by the same hand, and that hand was Anne Frank’s.
Roemer appealed the court’s decision against him, and more handwriting experts were called in. Their conclusion was the same; everything in the diary was in the same handwriting; there was no forgery.
Roemer appealed again, and this time the court asked for the technical services of the Federal Criminal Office, the Bundeskriminalamt, which carried out a careful analysis of the original manuscript of the diary with microscope & ultraviolet illumination in order to confirm its authenticity, and determine when it was written.
The report of the technical experts was given to the court and it contained a bombshell; large portions of the alleged “diary” were written in ballpoint pen ink, which was not manufactured prior to 1951.
Were it not for the previous testimony of the handwriting experts that the entire diary, including the portions written with ballpoint pen, is in the same hand, the father might have claimed that he only “edited” his daughter’s work, “clarifying” passages here and there. But the evidence was quite unambiguous.
It is now quite clear that Otto finished up the “original” of the diary after he had found a publisher in 1946. At that time, his original was nothing more than some rough notes and an idea in his head, which seemed to have prospects for making him a lot of money with little effort. First a typescript for the publisher, and then, as sales of the book began to mount, a completed handwritten “original” to show to doubters.
Just after the report of the Federal Criminal Office was given to the court, Otto Frank conveniently died, before he could be asked a number of very interesting questions. Meanwhile, the worldwide Jewish propaganda apparatus has continued its promotion of the Anne Frank myth as if nothing had happened. Der Spiegel seems to be the only mass-circulation news periodical to have exposed the fraud to date.
QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ASKED
In his book, “Adolf Hitler”, the author, Colin Cross, who brought more intelligence than is usual to the many problems of this period of history, observed astutely that “the shuffling of millions of Jews around Europe and murdering them, in a time of desperate war emergency, was useless from any rational point of view.”
Is it likely, that, at the height of the war, when the Germans were fighting a desperate battle for survival on two fronts, they would have conveyed millions of Jews for miles to supposedly elaborate and costly slaughter houses? To have conveyed three or four million Jews to Auschwitz alone would have placed an insuperable burden upon German transportation facilities, which were already strained to the limit supporting the far-flung Russian front. To have transported the mythical Six Million Jews and countless numbers of other nationalities to internment camps, and to have housed, clothed and fed them there, would simply have paralyzed their military operations. There is no reason to suppose that the efficient Germans would have put their military fortunes at such risk.
On the other hand, the transportation of a reasonable 363,000 prisoners, the number officially known by the Germans to have been registered there, to Auschwitz in the course of the war, at least makes sense in terms of the compulsory labor they supplied to assist the war effort. In fact, of the 3 million Jewish people living in German-occupied Europe, it is certain that no more than two million were ever interned at one time, and it is probable that the number was much closer to 1,500,000.
Per the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross, whole Jewish populations, such as that of Slovakia, avoided detention in camps, while others were placed in community ghettos like Theresienstadt. Moreover, from Western Europe deportations were far fewer.
Another question that must also be asked is how can millions of Jewish people be eliminated without a trace in six months? Could such enormous gatherings of Jews and executions on such a vast scale have been kept secret? These are the kind of questions that the critical, thinking person should ask. And he will soon discover that not only the statistical & documentary evidence known to Holocaust revisionists, but simple logistics combine to discredit the legend of the Six Million.
Although it was impossible for millions to have been murdered in them, the nature & conditions of Germany’s concentration camps have been vastly exaggerated to make the claim plausible.
Share now!
Author: DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse. DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse.


Welcome to Illumicorp

If this video at least hinted that the new world order is really a jew world order , it would @ @ @ @ @ still does summarize the agenda , though .

If this video at least hinted that the new world order is really a jew world order, it would be pretty great. It still does summarize the agenda, though.


Vivaldi Cello Concertos

Vivaldi left 27 concertos for cello , string orchestra and basso continuo .
Seven of these , three of them in the earliest datable manuscript versions , were preserved in the library of an amateur cellist , Count Rudolf Franz Erwein von Schönborn , at Wiesentheid .
Three of the concertos were copied by Johann Philipp Homeck , in the service of the brother of Count Rudolf and in Venice during the winter of 1708-1709 .
Other music was bought from Venice through the agency of Regaznig , representative of the Elector of Mainz , uncle of the Schönborns , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Other concertos are in the collection of the Turin Biblioteca Nazionale , with one , RV 404 , from Schwerin in the Mecklenburgische Landesbibliothek .
Vivaldi ’ s concertos follow a general pattern .
A first movement Allegro , in which a ritornello punctuates the entries of the solo instrument , is followed by a slow movement , an aria for the solo instrument , sometimes accompanied only by basso continuo and sometimes with the fuller participation of the string orchestra .
The last movement , again an Allegro , can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may be some variety in the form that the ritornello takes .
The Concerto in F major , RV 412 , follows this pattern , its bold tutti opening unison leading to a solo entry with a figure based on the arpeggio .
The whole orchestra is employed in the D minor Larghetto , with its solo triplet figuration , while the final Allegro , after a tutti opening , allows the cello characteristic material .
The arpeggio again provides a basis for the first solo entry in the Concerto in A minor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ followed by a C major aria Andante , where the soloist again has triplet figuration .
A novel tremolo effect is provided by the second violin , doubling the first in the final Allegro , before the cello enters , with its exploration of the higher registers of the instrument .
The Concerto in D major , RV 404 , allows the violins to enter in imitation in the first movement , before the entry of the soloist with basso continuo accompaniment .
The principle of imitation is continued in the other orchestral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aria ends with a cadence on A major , leading directly to the final Allegro vivace with its fugal string entries and interplay in solo passages between the cello and the first violin .
Characteristic Baroque sequences mark the opening of the Concerto in C major , RV 399 , which goes on to an A minor Largo , an aria with basso continuo , before the final Allegro , with its contrasted dynamic effects .
There is an emphatic opening and equally emphatic first solo entry in the Concerto in D minor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in which the cello emerges in G minor , with triplet figuration and a final Minuet to that is broadly tripartite in structure , preserving something of the form of the title .
Dialogue between first and second violin distinguishes the ritornello of the Concerto in C major , RV 398 , with its increasingly elaborate solo entries .
There is an A minor aria Largo and a final movement that allows the solo cello triplet figuration and more varied rhythms in later entries .
In the Concerto in F major , RV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violin is echoed by the soloist .
The second movement , in B flat major , is in the form of an aria for the soloist , who is allowed some freedom ( solo a piacimento ) and the mood is interrupted by a vigorous tutti , a prelude to further rhythmic variety in the solo writing .
Antonio Vivaldi : Concerto for Cello , Strings and Basso continuo in D major , RV 404 / RV Anh .
145 live performed by Cuore Barocco ( Cello solo – Tomáš Kardoš ) Vivaldi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ G Minor RV 531 , with soloists William Skeen and Tanya Tomkins

Vivaldi left 27 concertos for cello, string orchestra and basso continuo. Seven of these, three of them in the earliest datable manuscript versions, were preserved in the library of an amateur cellist, Count Rudolf Franz Erwein von Schönborn, at Wiesentheid. Three of the concertos were copied by Johann Philipp Homeck, in the service of the brother of Count Rudolf and in Venice during the winter of 1708-1709. Other music was bought from Venice through the agency of Regaznig, representative of the Elector of Mainz, uncle of the Schönborns, in Venice, between 1708 and 1713. Other concertos are in the collection of the Turin Biblioteca Nazionale, with one, RV 404, from Schwerin in the Mecklenburgische Landesbibliothek.
Vivaldi’s concertos follow a general pattern. A first movement Allegro, in which a ritornello punctuates the entries of the solo instrument, is followed by a slow movement, an aria for the solo instrument, sometimes accompanied only by basso continuo and sometimes with the fuller participation of the string orchestra. The last movement, again an Allegro, can be in duple or triple metre and there may be some variety in the form that the ritornello takes. The Concerto in F major, RV 412, follows this pattern, its bold tutti opening unison leading to a solo entry with a figure based on the arpeggio. The whole orchestra is employed in the D minor Larghetto, with its solo triplet figuration, while the final Allegro, after a tutti opening, allows the cello characteristic material. The arpeggio again provides a basis for the first solo entry in the Concerto in A minor, RV 419, its opening Allegro followed by a C major aria Andante, where the soloist again has triplet figuration. A novel tremolo effect is provided by the second violin, doubling the first in the final Allegro, before the cello enters, with its exploration of the higher registers of the instrument.
The Concerto in D major, RV 404, allows the violins to enter in imitation in the first movement, before the entry of the soloist with basso continuo accompaniment. The principle of imitation is continued in the other orchestral ritornello entries. An Affettuoso D major aria ends with a cadence on A major, leading directly to the final Allegro vivace with its fugal string entries and interplay in solo passages between the cello and the first violin.
Characteristic Baroque sequences mark the opening of the Concerto in C major, RV 399, which goes on to an A minor Largo, an aria with basso continuo, before the final Allegro, with its contrasted dynamic effects. There is an emphatic opening and equally emphatic first solo entry in the Concerto in D minor, RV 406, with an Andante in which the cello emerges in G minor, with triplet figuration and a final Minuet to that is broadly tripartite in structure, preserving something of the form of the title.
Dialogue between first and second violin distinguishes the ritornello of the Concerto in C major, RV 398, with its increasingly elaborate solo entries. There is an A minor aria Largo and a final movement that allows the solo cello triplet figuration and more varied rhythms in later entries. In the Concerto in F major, RV 410, the syncopation of the first violin is echoed by the soloist. The second movement, in B flat major, is in the form of an aria for the soloist, who is allowed some freedom (solo a piacimento) and the mood is interrupted by a vigorous tutti, a prelude to further rhythmic variety in the solo writing.
Antonio Vivaldi: Concerto for Cello, Strings and Basso continuo in D major, RV 404 / RV Anh. 145 live performed by Cuore Barocco (Cello solo – Tomáš Kardoš)
Vivaldi – Cello Concerto D minor RV 407 – Ewa Witzcak, cello
Vivaldi’s Concerto for two cellos in G Minor RV 531, with soloists William Skeen and Tanya Tomkins
Vivaldi: Complete Cello Concertos
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-03-02--New Study Shows Drinking Dairy Milk Could Increase Risk of Breast Cancer

Drinking dairy milk may be a contributing factor in having an increased risk of developing breast cancer , according to a new study conducted by researchers at Loma Linda University Health .
Researchers published the controversial study this week in the Oxford International Journal Of Epidemiology .
They looked at the dairy intake of 53,000 American women and found that higher intakes of diary milk were associated with greater risks of developing breast cancer .
The average age of participants in the study was 57 years old .
Women are typically diagnosed with breast cancer in their 40s and 50s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chance of being diagnosed with breast cancer then younger women .
The national rate of breast cancer in the U.S. is 13 percent .
It is believed that about one in eight women will contract the cancer .
The rate of breast cancer frequency in the study was lower than the national average .
The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute and the World Cancer Research Fund as a part of a health study exploring the links between lifestyle , diet , and disease .
According to the study , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breast cancer—but not causation .
The scientists found that consuming as little as a third of a cup of milk a day was associated with a 30 percent increase in the risk of breast cancer .
For women who drink two to three cups of diary milk per day , the study proclaimed the associated risk of developing breast cancer rose to more than 70 percent .
The study found no significant difference in comparing full fat to non-fat milk .
However , the researchers did not take into account other risk factors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ethnicity , family history , and genetics .
The study was also done via questionnaire and analysis through a database rather than through independent testing , which may skew the results .
In other words , the study is not fully conclusive and more testing is needed .
However , the researchers are warning that “ current guidelines for dairy milk consumption could be viewed with some caution.
” Since there was no independent testing conducted , it is unknown if there is a connection or not .
According to American biochemist Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of the most harmful foods consumed by humans , and he has the scientific research to back up his claim .
Campbell has been warning people for years that milk “ turns on cancer ” and that it “ leeches calcium from your bones.
” Dr. Campbell is known for his influential book The China Study : The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted And the Startling Implications for Diet , Weight Loss , And Long-term Health .
The book , based on a 20-year long study conducted by the Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the University of Oxford , documents serious negative implications of consuming milk .
According to Campbell , the main protein found in cow ’ s milk is called casein and is a serious carcinogen that can have major consequences for public health in America and around the world .
Campbell says that milk actually makes bones weaker by leaching calcium from them .
One thing animal protein does is trigger metabolic acidosis .
This happens when the body produces too much acid and becomes very acidic , which can be caused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of casein found in animal protein .
Casein makes up almost 90 percent of the protein in a cow ’ s milk .
When the body experiences this type of acidosis , it actually forces the body to compensate by leaching calcium from the bones to help neutralize the increased acidity .
Over time , all of this can have severe and detrimental effects on bone health , and studies have shown this , ” Katherine S. Pollard , a PhD at the University of California , San Francisco , said in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as Dr. Campbell states , is that the consumption of casein protein creates an acidic condition in the body , known as metabolic acidosis , which is widely perceived to be a primary driver of a litany of diseases and poor health conditions and has even been called a precursor to cancer .
A previous study of men suggested dairy products might increase a male ’ s risk of developing prostate cancer by 30 to 50 percent .
Last year TMU reported that a trial showed that human breast milk may do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ within called Alpha1H .
This chemical helps break tumors up into smaller fragments which the body can then rid itself of via urine .
So what ’ s a milk lover to do ?
There are many alternatives on the market for daily milk .
Milk doesn ’ t just come from cows .
Alternative milks , including those made from coconuts , almonds , oats , flax , and more are readily available in stores and are very easy to make yourself .
Often these milks provide even more nutrients than cow @ @ @ @

By Aaron Kesel, The Mind Unleashed
Drinking dairy milk may be a contributing factor in having an increased risk of developing breast cancer, according to a new study conducted by researchers at Loma Linda University Health.
Researchers published the controversial study this week in the Oxford International Journal Of Epidemiology. They looked at the dairy intake of 53,000 American women and found that higher intakes of diary milk were associated with greater risks of developing breast cancer. The average age of participants in the study was 57 years old.
Women are typically diagnosed with breast cancer in their 40s and 50s, therefore those women had a higher chance of being diagnosed with breast cancer then younger women.
The national rate of breast cancer in the U.S. is 13 percent. It is believed that about one in eight women will contract the cancer. The rate of breast cancer frequency in the study was lower than the national average.
The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute and the World Cancer Research Fund as a part of a health study exploring the links between lifestyle, diet, and disease.
According to the study, there is an association between milk consumption and breast cancer—but not causation.
The scientists found that consuming as little as a third of a cup of milk a day was associated with a 30 percent increase in the risk of breast cancer. For women who drink two to three cups of diary milk per day, the study proclaimed the associated risk of developing breast cancer rose to more than 70 percent.
The study found no significant difference in comparing full fat to non-fat milk.
However, the researchers did not take into account other risk factors for breast cancer, including environment, ethnicity, family history, and genetics. The study was also done via questionnaire and analysis through a database rather than through independent testing, which may skew the results. In other words, the study is not fully conclusive and more testing is needed. However, the researchers are warning that “current guidelines for dairy milk consumption could be viewed with some caution.”
Since there was no independent testing conducted, it is unknown if there is a connection or not.
According to American biochemist Dr. T. Colin Campbell, daily milk is one of the most harmful foods consumed by humans, and he has the scientific research to back up his claim. Campbell has been warning people for years that milk “turns on cancer” and that it “leeches calcium from your bones.” Dr. Campbell is known for his influential book The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted And the Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss, And Long-term Health. The book, based on a 20-year long study conducted by the Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Cornell University, and the University of Oxford, documents serious negative implications of consuming milk.
According to Campbell, the main protein found in cow’s milk is called casein and is a serious carcinogen that can have major consequences for public health in America and around the world.
Casein is the most relevant chemical carcinogen ever identified, make no mistake about it.” – Dr. Colin Campbell
Campbell says that milk actually makes bones weaker by leaching calcium from them.
One thing animal protein does is trigger metabolic acidosis. This happens when the body produces too much acid and becomes very acidic, which can be caused by multiple things, including the absorption of casein found in animal protein. Casein makes up almost 90 percent of the protein in a cow’s milk. When the body experiences this type of acidosis, it actually forces the body to compensate by leaching calcium from the bones to help neutralize the increased acidity. Over time, all of this can have severe and detrimental effects on bone health, and studies have shown this,” Katherine S. Pollard, a PhD at the University of California, San Francisco, said in a lecture.
The primary reason for this, as Dr. Campbell states, is that the consumption of casein protein creates an acidic condition in the body, known as metabolic acidosis, which is widely perceived to be a primary driver of a litany of diseases and poor health conditions and has even been called a precursor to cancer.
A previous study of men suggested dairy products might increase a male’s risk of developing prostate cancer by 30 to 50 percent.
Last year TMU reported that a trial showed that human breast milk may do the opposite due to a chemical contained within called Alpha1H. This chemical helps break tumors up into smaller fragments which the body can then rid itself of via urine.
So what’s a milk lover to do? There are many alternatives on the market for daily milk. Milk doesn’t just come from cows. Alternative milks, including those made from coconuts, almonds, oats, flax, and more are readily available in stores and are very easy to make yourself. Often these milks provide even more nutrients than cow milk does too.
By Aaron Kesel | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-02--Verizon Warns AGAIN About Personal Injury and Death Lawsuits from Wireless Radiation Health Effects

Straight from the horse ’ s mouth !
Thanks to 5G Crisis for including this information – as well as the link – on their website .
When the wireless companies themselves admit that their products could pose significant dangers to the public , you know we have a problem on our hands .
In its annual SEC 10-K filing published on February 21st , 2020 , Verizon announced to its shareholders the following : “ We are subject to a significant amount of litigation , which could require us to pay significant damages or settlements…In addition , our wireless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio frequency transmitters .
We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits .
In addition , we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.
” Read the full report ( See page 17 ) The New England Patriots may be interested in this because in November Verizon turned on 5G in their football stadium and the team ’ s captain reported that he had never seen so much illness among players .
In fact , Verizon has turned 5G @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Cleveland , Ohio school .
It ’ s not just about 5G , though ; and all telecoms are aware of this .
Decades of research has already determined that exposure to all sources of Electromagnetic Radiation ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) – including cell phone radiation and WiFi – reduces immunity and causes other symptoms and health problems in addition to increasing cancer risk .
American Academy of Pediatrics and other health experts have also warned that children are more vulnerable to harm from exposure .
In fact , there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of wireless radiation that has been determined for kids or pregnant women .
Activist Post reports regularly about exposure to wireless radiation and other sources of “ Electrosmog ” .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites .

Straight from the horse’s mouth! Thanks to 5G Crisis for including this information – as well as the link – on their website.
When the wireless companies themselves admit that their products could pose significant dangers to the public, you know we have a problem on our hands.
In its annual SEC 10-K filing published on February 21st, 2020, Verizon announced to its shareholders the following: “We are subject to a significant amount of litigation, which could require us to pay significant damages or settlements…In addition, our wireless business also faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio frequency transmitters. We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.” Read the full report here. (See page 17)
The New England Patriots may be interested in this because in November Verizon turned on 5G in their football stadium and the team’s captain reported that he had never seen so much illness among players. In fact, Verizon has turned 5G on all across the U.S. including at a Cleveland, Ohio school.
It’s not just about 5G, though; and all telecoms are aware of this. Decades of research has already determined that exposure to all sources of Electromagnetic Radiation (aka “Electrosmog”) – including cell phone radiation and WiFi – reduces immunity and causes other symptoms and health problems in addition to increasing cancer risk. American Academy of Pediatrics and other health experts have also warned that children are more vulnerable to harm from exposure. In fact, there is still no “safe” level of wireless radiation that has been determined for kids or pregnant women.
Activist Post reports regularly about exposure to wireless radiation and other sources of “Electrosmog”. For more information visit our archives and the following websites.
This article originally appeared on Activist Post.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-02--Black Pigeon Speaks: “I Have Seen the Camps, I Have Never Nor Will I Ever Deny the Holocaust”

So many people bought into the BS this guy was spewing about “ women destroy civilization ” even though it @ @ @ @ @ is a jew deflecting blame from his tribe .
This guy looks like a young @ @ @ @ @ out loud .
Full vid from his channel ( still up on jewtube )

So many people bought into the BS this guy was spewing about “women destroy civilization” even though it should have been obvious he is a jew deflecting blame from his tribe. This guy looks like a young Ezra Levant, for crying out loud.
395 views
Full vid from his channel (still up on jewtube)
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-03--Geek Fandom Is Angry — Should We Tell Them It’s The Jews?

I ’ ve been a life-long Science Fiction reader and a fan of the Star Trek franchise , lesser the Star Wars franchise .
As a child I read DC comics and occasionally picked up the British Dr. Who series when it aired on PBS .
I have watched many of the recent Science Fiction and super hero movies , often coming away disappointed with the weak storylines and the preachy themes of identity politics and anti-White agendas .
Now we all know that the origins of much of the Science Fiction entertainment media has come from the minds of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Jewish influence was more subtle and the stories depicted were often entertaining .
Such entertainment was always a form of brief escapism from a much more somber reality .
While the special effects were often sub-par by today ’ s standards , I still think some of the best Science Fiction stories and movies were produced in the 60s and 70s .
Now that the Jews have smugly taken control of every aspect of our society they no longer see the need to be subtle in what they produce for the big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
You can not avoid the various themes of miscegenation , radical feminism , anti-Whiteism , anti-heterosexuality and just over-the-top White cultural debasement .
This is just one aspect of in-your-face Jewish supremacist White genocide .
Recently , the comic book industry ( under the umbrella of the same Jewish controlled entertainment corporations ) , Hollywood and the BBC have been releasing new material based upon well-established Science Fiction franchises .
Geeks and fandom have not been pleased with the new incarnations .
Examples would be the CBS All Access Star Trek Discovery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the last three Disney Star Wars movies , BBC ’ s Dr. Who , CW network ’ s Batwoman ( or what the fan critics refer to as Batwahman ) , Paramount ’ s Terminator : Dark Fate movie , Marvel ’ s Captain Marvel movie the DC Harley Quinn : Birds of Prey movie , etc .
I haven ’ t read comic books since I was a child and I have not bothered to watch any of the above films or television series except the first movie in the last Star @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I have been following some of the critics of these releases on YouTube .
These lifelong fans of various Science Fiction franchises are not afraid to voice their disdain for what they call ‘ Woke ’ entertainment and many have banded together to form what they call ‘ The Fandom Menace.
’ There is a defacto verbal Twitter and media war going on between the fans and those controlling the entertainment media .
Now , just who could be the ones controlling the ( kosher ) entertainment media ?
While these critics are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today ’ s entertainment , since it is in effect destroying what is called the canon ( often over several decades worth ) of various Science Fiction franchises ( by what they call ret-conning ) , the light has not yet dawned on them that this is part of the Jewish supremacist plan .
Right now they think the solution is to punish these producers of dreck by withholding fan funds from ‘ Woke ’ creations , thus causing lost sales , falling ratings and film box-office duds .
But , with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money really matter over the message the Jews want conveyed in their productions ?
Here ’ s a couple of interesting questions ; what happens to a mostly White male segment of the population when its bread-and-circuses gets taken away and what will happen if this same population ever figures out it is the Jews doing the taking ?
If overall trends continue we all may be forced someday into becoming more than just keyboard warriors .
As an example I include here a recent video from a British critic ; there are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the video he says “ They ’ re going to keep on doing this until it ’ s ash.
” No , the Jews are going to keep on doing everything they ’ re doing until all White people are ash , unless we bring an end to their agenda .

I’ve been a life-long Science Fiction reader and a fan of the Star Trek franchise, lesser the Star Wars franchise. As a child I read DC comics and occasionally picked up the British Dr. Who series when it aired on PBS. I have watched many of the recent Science Fiction and super hero movies, often coming away disappointed with the weak storylines and the preachy themes of identity politics and anti-White agendas.
Now we all know that the origins of much of the Science Fiction entertainment media has come from the minds of Jewish creators, but in the past the Jewish influence was more subtle and the stories depicted were often entertaining. Such entertainment was always a form of brief escapism from a much more somber reality. While the special effects were often sub-par by today’s standards, I still think some of the best Science Fiction stories and movies were produced in the 60s and 70s.
Now that the Jews have smugly taken control of every aspect of our society they no longer see the need to be subtle in what they produce for the big and small screen and within comic books. You cannot avoid the various themes of miscegenation, radical feminism, anti-Whiteism, anti-heterosexuality and just over-the-top White cultural debasement. This is just one aspect of in-your-face Jewish supremacist White genocide.
Recently, the comic book industry (under the umbrella of the same Jewish controlled entertainment corporations), Hollywood and the BBC have been releasing new material based upon well-established Science Fiction franchises. Geeks and fandom have not been pleased with the new incarnations. Examples would be the CBS All Access Star Trek Discovery and Star Trek: Picard series, the last three Disney Star Wars movies, BBC’s Dr. Who, CW network’s Batwoman (or what the fan critics refer to as Batwahman), Paramount’s Terminator: Dark Fate movie, Marvel’s Captain Marvel movie the DC Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey movie, etc.
I haven’t read comic books since I was a child and I have not bothered to watch any of the above films or television series except the first movie in the last Star Wars trilogy and Captain Marvel, but I have been following some of the critics of these releases on YouTube. These lifelong fans of various Science Fiction franchises are not afraid to voice their disdain for what they call ‘Woke’ entertainment and many have banded together to form what they call ‘The Fandom Menace.’ There is a defacto verbal Twitter and media war going on between the fans and those controlling the entertainment media. Now, just who could be the ones controlling the (kosher) entertainment media?
While these critics are very vocal about what is wrong with today’s entertainment, since it is in effect destroying what is called the canon (often over several decades worth) of various Science Fiction franchises (by what they call ret-conning), the light has not yet dawned on them that this is part of the Jewish supremacist plan. Right now they think the solution is to punish these producers of dreck by withholding fan funds from ‘Woke’ creations, thus causing lost sales, falling ratings and film box-office duds. But, with the currency under complete Jewish control, does money really matter over the message the Jews want conveyed in their productions?
Here’s a couple of interesting questions; what happens to a mostly White male segment of the population when its bread-and-circuses gets taken away and what will happen if this same population ever figures out it is the Jews doing the taking? If overall trends continue we all may be forced someday into becoming more than just keyboard warriors.
As an example I include here a recent video from a British critic; there are many others.
At the end of the video he says “They’re going to keep on doing this until it’s ash.” No, the Jews are going to keep on doing everything they’re doing until all White people are ash, unless we bring an end to their agenda.
Share now!