renegadetribune--2020-02-24--7 NWO Agendas Accompanying the Coronavirus Outbreak

• THE STORY : While the debate continues as to the true count of infected people due to the COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic , several sinister agendas are being pushed out .
• THE IMPLICATIONS : Is the coronavirus an opportunity or excuse for the authorities to roll out long-desired schemes of control and manipulation ?
While the coronavirus epidemic continues , with people debating on both sides whether it is being overplayed or underplayed , it is worthwhile pausing to consider what agendas – and I mean which NWO agendas – are being rolled out using the epidemic as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in my last article “ The Coronavirus 5G Connection and Coverup , ” with these kind of outbreaks , there is always a dual motivation for authorities : the motivation to hype and the motivation to downplay because both approaches serve the ruling class in different ways .
Deception is a hallmark of government , and clearly all the more so in an emergency , so it is always going to be hard to trust whatever news or stats are coming from official sources .
Regardless of the virus ’ true origins and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that there are several agendas being pushed as you read these words .
It ’ s the same old Hegelian dialectic strategy of problem-reaction-solution ; and whatever the reality is on a microbial level , the world ’ s population has the perception of a problem , so the ruling class has another opportunity to make their order out of chaos .
Below are 7 NWO agendas being carried out due to the coronavirus epidemic .
Quite a few of the speakers at the Event 201 simulation ( hosted by the Johns Hopkins @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ WEF ] and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ) spoke of the need for the centralized control of information during a pandemic , including one speaker Lavan Thiru ( described as a Monetary Authority of Singapore ) who mentioned “ a step up from the part of the government on enforcement actions against fake news.
” There were some who said Big Tech is a no longer a platform but a broadcaster and must be made to combat fake news .
Another speaker in typical fashion demonized conspiracy theories .
Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ event ( which came true 6 weeks later ) : The plan is to continue the censorship which Big Tech has been spearheading for years now , using the excuse of harmful “ fake news ” by claiming that the dissemination of false information during an emergency is a bigger problem than usual and must be stopped .
Here are some other quotes from the event : That last statement reveals yet again a dominant NWO agenda in so many arenas of life : narrative control .
The cashless agenda is a long-term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with transhumanism , i.e .
the digitization of everything in society , including things like money , information and life itself .
Power-hungry control freaks – the types of people that gravitate towards government – love the idea of a cashless society because then every single economic transaction can be traced , which allows authorities to build an even more complete picture of who you are so as stop any possible disobedience or revolution before it happens .
It also increases governmental revenue via taxation .
As this Activist Post article highlights , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forward the cashless agenda by claiming that paper money must now be taken out of circulation due to the possibility that it could contain traces of COVID-19 and therefore contribute to the spreading of the coronavirus .
Governments love martial law scenarios , because normal human rights are suspended .
Authoritarian China has been lauded by many globalists such as the late David Rockefeller as a model for the New World Order .
Some of the photos and videos coming out of China showing the police state there have been horrific .
Another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to see how much they can get away with under the banner of fighting the virus .
The coronavirus epidemic has provided a good excuse for governments round the world to introduce one of their favorite NWO agendas – mandatory vaccination .
The reason why this agenda is particularly so well liked is that it allows authorities access to the human body – and not just the citizen ’ s body , but his or her bloodstream too .
truthfully , we have no idea what is in that needle when it gets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be implanted in our bodies without our knowledge or consent .
Coincidentally ( or not ) , China passed a law on June 29th 2019 that rolled out a national mandatory vaccination program .
Coincidentally ( or not ) , the law went into effect on December 1st 2019 , just weeks before the coronavirus epidemic became a worldwide news story .
Here is the article : I also have to wonder about the implications when we have so-called experts like Ralph Baric who are pointing out that this coronavirus epidemic may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ story of the 10-year-old Chinese boy who had no symptoms but allegedly tested positive for COVID-19 ) .
This may be helpful information , but it also adds fuel to the mandatory vaccine fire , so to speak , because then the authorities claim that they have to vaccinate everyone to protect society due to all these possible hidden asymptomatic carriers that could pop up and infect everyone .
By extension , mandatory vaccination may also include DNA vaccines and microchipping ( see next ) .
As David Icke says , if Bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s bad for humanity .
NWO point-man Gates has been heavily pushing GMOs and vaccines for years ( including slipping up and admitting that vaccines contribute to population control ) ; he was part of Event 201 that simulated the coronavirus epidemic before it happened ; he “ didn ’ t have any business relationship or friendship with ” Jeffrey Epstein ; so now we have to ask how else this sold-out NWO frontman is benefiting from the virus .
Turns out the answer may be found in yet another globalist project @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is the human microchipping agenda , repackaged .
It sells itself as “ a trusted and reliable way ” to fulfill a “ fundamental and universal human right ” – safeguarding your identity both online and in the physical world .
This article reports : The ID2020 Alliance , as it ’ s being called , is a digital identity program that aims to “ leverage immunization ” as a means of inserting tiny microchips into people ’ s bodies .
In collaboration with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government of Bangladesh and various other “ partners in government , academia , and humanitarian relief , ” the ID2020 Alliance … wants all humans to be “ vaccinated ” with digital tracking chips that will create a seamless monitoring system for the New World Order to manage the populations of the world with ease .
While the ID2020 program ’ s testing grounds are primarily in the Third World , the group says it ’ s also now working with governments here in the United States to start microchipping people through vaccination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ example , the homeless population is now being exploited as a collective guinea pig for ID2020 ’ s microchip vaccination program , which the group claims will help to “ empower ” homeless people by supposedly giving them “ control ” over their personal identity data .
“ The City of Austin , ID2020 , and several other partners are working together with homeless people and the service providers who engage with them to develop a blockchain-enabled digital identity platform called MyPass to empower homeless people with their own identity data , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also jabbing refugees with its microchip vaccinations through two inaugural pilot programs known as iRespond and Everest .
Since Gates was obviously intimately involved in planning this outbreak and ensuring his companies have the patents and vaccines for the newly released virus , is he also planning on using the coronavirus epidemic to further promote ID2020 ?
6 .
Agenda 2030 : Wuhan Slated to be one of China ’ s Smart Cities A massive agenda involved in the coronavirus epidemic is the agenda of all agendas – UN Agenda 2030 , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Before the outbreak China had already planned which of its cities were going to be the ones slated to become the pilot Smart Cities .
Wuhan was one of them ( which makes sense why it was also the site of China ’ s 5G rollout as covered in my previous article ) .
See here : I don ’ t know if I would exactly classify this as a NWO agenda , but a race-based bioweapon is certainly a likely possibility here .
Consider that virtually all known deaths from the coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Only around 4 deaths outside of China have been reported – 1 in the Philippines on February 1st , 1 in Japan on February 13th and 2 in Iran on February 20th .
Lance Walton ( VDare.com ) has written several articles asking why no one is talking about it .
He points out how WHO ( World Health Organization ) Director-General Tedros Ahanom Ghebreyesus declared that he opposed travel bans .
ZeroHedge.com quoted him as saying that “ We reiterate our call to all countries not to impose restrictions that unnecessarily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Such restrictions can have the effect of increasing fear and stigma , with little public health benefit.
” If the virus doesn ’ t discriminate based on race , and just weakens or kills anyone , then the public health benefits of banning people would be great .
However , if the virus does indeed discriminate on race , and only targets East Asians , then the WHO head ’ s comments make sense .
This raises yet more questions : if the COVID-19 is a race-based bioweapon , who created it ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ they sneak it into China and release it ?
Conclusion : Coronavirus Epidemic Being Used to Push NWO Agendas Interestingly , the opening ceremony of the Military World Games in Wuhan declared a “ New World ” ( see image of a screenshot from the opening ceremony ) which suggests the phrase New World Order and also suggests societal transformation – yet another clue that this entire event was pre-planned .
Whatever the truth turns out to be about the origin of the virus itself , who created it , how it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dangerous as is hyped , there can be no doubt that the entire coronavirus epidemic phenomenon is being used to accelerate several NWO agendas in typical problem-reaction-solution style .
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com .
Makia is on Steemit and FB .

By Makia Freeman
THE STORY: While the debate continues as to the true count of infected people due to the COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic, several sinister agendas are being pushed out.
THE IMPLICATIONS: Is the coronavirus an opportunity or excuse for the authorities to roll out long-desired schemes of control and manipulation?
While the coronavirus epidemic continues, with people debating on both sides whether it is being overplayed or underplayed, it is worthwhile pausing to consider what agendas – and I mean which NWO agendas – are being rolled out using the epidemic as a cover or pretext.
As I covered in my last article “The Coronavirus 5G Connection and Coverup,” with these kind of outbreaks, there is always a dual motivation for authorities: the motivation to hype and the motivation to downplay because both approaches serve the ruling class in different ways. Deception is a hallmark of government, and clearly all the more so in an emergency, so it is always going to be hard to trust whatever news or stats are coming from official sources. Regardless of the virus’ true origins and virulence, we can say for sure that there are several agendas being pushed as you read these words. It’s the same old Hegelian dialectic strategy of problem-reaction-solution; and whatever the reality is on a microbial level, the world’s population has the perception of a problem, so the ruling class has another opportunity to make their order out of chaos. Below are 7 NWO agendas being carried out due to the coronavirus epidemic.
1. Centralized Control of Information, i.e. Censorship and Narrative Control
Quite a few of the speakers at the Event 201 simulation (hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center in partnership with World Economic Forum [WEF] and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) spoke of the need for the centralized control of information during a pandemic, including one speaker Lavan Thiru (described as a Monetary Authority of Singapore) who mentioned “a step up from the part of the government on enforcement actions against fake news.” There were some who said Big Tech is a no longer a platform but a broadcaster and must be made to combat fake news. Another speaker in typical fashion demonized conspiracy theories. Here is a quote directly from the simulation/make-believe event (which came true 6 weeks later):
Disinformation and misinformation are wreaking havoc … pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the … virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines, and have seen public faith in their products plummet. Unrest due to false rumors and divisive messaging is rising, and is exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall, and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions. National governments are considering or have already implemented a range of interventions to combat misinformation. Some governments have taken control of national access to the internet; others are censoring websites and social media content, and a small number have shut down internet access completely to prevent the flow of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.
The plan is to continue the censorship which Big Tech has been spearheading for years now, using the excuse of harmful “fake news” by claiming that the dissemination of false information during an emergency is a bigger problem than usual and must be stopped. Here are some other quotes from the event:
I do think that there needs to be sort-of an honest broker, a centralized command-and-control organization that really brings together the public-private sector, both on a global approach and also on a local approach … Yes, I agree, and I wanted to speak to the point about having the honest broker, and I think in this regard the United Nations fits the bill … It’s important that the UN and WHO remain very clear, but when they challenge governments directly, they often get into this issue of sovereignty, and so I think it’s really important not to have that as the only response … it’s really critical to remember soft power influence …
That last statement reveals yet again a dominant NWO agenda in so many arenas of life: narrative control.
2. The Cashless Agenda
The cashless agenda is a long-term NWO scheme that goes hand in hand with transhumanism, i.e. the digitization of everything in society, including things like money, information and life itself. Power-hungry control freaks – the types of people that gravitate towards government – love the idea of a cashless society because then every single economic transaction can be traced, which allows authorities to build an even more complete picture of who you are so as stop any possible disobedience or revolution before it happens. It also increases governmental revenue via taxation. As this Activist Post article highlights, China has jumped on the opportunity to forward the cashless agenda by claiming that paper money must now be taken out of circulation due to the possibility that it could contain traces of COVID-19 and therefore contribute to the spreading of the coronavirus.
3. Martial Law Quarantines
Governments love martial law scenarios, because normal human rights are suspended. Authoritarian China has been lauded by many globalists such as the late David Rockefeller as a model for the New World Order. Some of the photos and videos coming out of China showing the police state there have been horrific. Another crisis, another opportunity for the government to see how much they can get away with under the banner of fighting the virus.
4. Mandatory Vaccination
The coronavirus epidemic has provided a good excuse for governments round the world to introduce one of their favorite NWO agendas – mandatory vaccination. The reason why this agenda is particularly so well liked is that it allows authorities access to the human body – and not just the citizen’s body, but his or her bloodstream too. truthfully, we have no idea what is in that needle when it gets injected, so all sorts of things could be implanted in our bodies without our knowledge or consent.
Coincidentally (or not), China passed a law on June 29th 2019 that rolled out a national mandatory vaccination program. Coincidentally (or not), the law went into effect on December 1st 2019, just weeks before the coronavirus epidemic became a worldwide news story. Here is the article:
On June 29, 2019, the National People’s Congress Standing Committee of the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) adopted the PRC Law on Vaccine Administration (Vaccine Law). The official Xinhua news agency states that the Law provides for the “strictest” vaccine management with tough penalties in order to ensure the country’s vaccine safety … The Law mandates the launching of a national vaccine electronic tracking platform that integrates tracking information throughout the whole process of vaccine production, distribution, and use to ensure all vaccine products can be tracked and verified (art. 10). According to the Law, China is to implement a state immunization program, and residents living within the territory of China are legally obligated to be vaccinated with immunization program vaccines, which are provided by the government free of charge. Local governments and parents or other guardians of children must ensure that children be vaccinated with the immunization program vaccines … The Law will take effect on December 1, 2019.
I also have to wonder about the implications when we have so-called experts like Ralph Baric who are pointing out that this coronavirus epidemic may include asymptomatic carriers (as in this story of the 10-year-old Chinese boy who had no symptoms but allegedly tested positive for COVID-19). This may be helpful information, but it also adds fuel to the mandatory vaccine fire, so to speak, because then the authorities claim that they have to vaccinate everyone to protect society due to all these possible hidden asymptomatic carriers that could pop up and infect everyone. By extension, mandatory vaccination may also include DNA vaccines and microchipping (see next).
5. Bill Gates’ ID2020: Digital Identification via Microchipping
As David Icke says, if Bill Gates is involved in it, it’s bad for humanity. NWO point-man Gates has been heavily pushing GMOs and vaccines for years (including slipping up and admitting that vaccines contribute to population control); he was part of Event 201 that simulated the coronavirus epidemic before it happened; he “didn’t have any business relationship or friendship with” Jeffrey Epstein; so now we have to ask how else this sold-out NWO frontman is benefiting from the virus. Turns out the answer may be found in yet another globalist project Gates has been promoting: ID 2020. This is the human microchipping agenda, repackaged. It sells itself as “a trusted and reliable way” to fulfill a “fundamental and universal human right” – safeguarding your identity both online and in the physical world. This article reports:
The ID2020 Alliance, as it’s being called, is a digital identity program that aims to “leverage immunization” as a means of inserting tiny microchips into people’s bodies. In collaboration with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations, also known as GAVI, the government of Bangladesh and various other “partners in government, academia, and humanitarian relief,” the ID2020 Alliance … wants all humans to be “vaccinated” with digital tracking chips that will create a seamless monitoring system for the New World Order to manage the populations of the world with ease. While the ID2020 program’s testing grounds are primarily in the Third World, the group says it’s also now working with governments here in the United States to start microchipping people through vaccination. In Austin, Texas, for example, the homeless population is now being exploited as a collective guinea pig for ID2020’s microchip vaccination program, which the group claims will help to “empower” homeless people by supposedly giving them “control” over their personal identity data. “The City of Austin, ID2020, and several other partners are working together with homeless people and the service providers who engage with them to develop a blockchain-enabled digital identity platform called MyPass to empower homeless people with their own identity data,” writes Chris Burt for BiometricUpdate.com. ID2020 is also jabbing refugees with its microchip vaccinations through two inaugural pilot programs known as iRespond and Everest.
Since Gates was obviously intimately involved in planning this outbreak and ensuring his companies have the patents and vaccines for the newly released virus, is he also planning on using the coronavirus epidemic to further promote ID2020?
6. Agenda 2030: Wuhan Slated to be one of China’s Smart Cities
A massive agenda involved in the coronavirus epidemic is the agenda of all agendas – UN Agenda 2030, which involves Smart Cities. Guess what? Before the outbreak China had already planned which of its cities were going to be the ones slated to become the pilot Smart Cities. Wuhan was one of them (which makes sense why it was also the site of China’s 5G rollout as covered in my previous article). See here:
Wuhan Future City, located in eastern East Lake High-Tech Development Zone, is one of the four concentrated talent bases for major State-owned enterprises and the only “future science and technology town” approved by the State Council for central and western regions.
7. Is the Coronavirus Epidemic a Race-Based Bioweapon?
I don’t know if I would exactly classify this as a NWO agenda, but a race-based bioweapon is certainly a likely possibility here. Consider that virtually all known deaths from the coronavirus epidemic thus far have been in China. Only around 4 deaths outside of China have been reported – 1 in the Philippines on February 1st, 1 in Japan on February 13th and 2 in Iran on February 20th. Lance Walton (VDare.com) has written several articles asking why no one is talking about it. He points out how WHO (World Health Organization) Director-General Tedros Ahanom Ghebreyesus declared that he opposed travel bans. ZeroHedge.com quoted him as saying that “We reiterate our call to all countries not to impose restrictions that unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade. Such restrictions can have the effect of increasing fear and stigma, with little public health benefit.” If the virus doesn’t discriminate based on race, and just weakens or kills anyone, then the public health benefits of banning people would be great. However, if the virus does indeed discriminate on race, and only targets East Asians, then the WHO head’s comments make sense. This raises yet more questions: if the COVID-19 is a race-based bioweapon, who created it? The US? Israel? How did they sneak it into China and release it?
Conclusion: Coronavirus Epidemic Being Used to Push NWO Agendas
Interestingly, the opening ceremony of the Military World Games in Wuhan declared a “New World” (see image of a screenshot from the opening ceremony) which suggests the phrase New World Order and also suggests societal transformation – yet another clue that this entire event was pre-planned. Whatever the truth turns out to be about the origin of the virus itself, who created it, how it was released and whether it is really as dangerous as is hyped, there can be no doubt that the entire coronavirus epidemic phenomenon is being used to accelerate several NWO agendas in typical problem-reaction-solution style.
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and FB.
Sources:
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/coronavirus-5g-connection-coverup-vaccines-transhumanism/
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx8xKcQMTRs
*https://www.activistpost.com/2020/02/china-is-scrubbing-cash-notes-to-stop-virus-spreading-so-its-government-paper-money-wont-kill-you.html
*https://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/china-vaccine-law-passed/
*https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/china-10-year-old-boy-had-coronavirus-without-symptoms-1.1580296642401
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/bill-gates-vaccines-reduce-population-growth/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/epstein-saga-connects-almost-all-aspects-worldwide-conspiracy/
*https://id2020.org/
*https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-23-vaccines-used-global-biometric-identities-for-surveillance.html
*http://www.chinaopticsvalley.com/2018-09/12/c_64297.htm
*https://vdare.com/articles/still-no-non-east-asian-deaths-from-corona-but-cnn-s-sanjay-gupta-won-t-admit-it
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-02-28--Israeli Scientists Say They Will Have Coronavirus Vaccine “In A Few Weeks”

( ZH ) Yesterday , Dr. Anthony Fauci , the head of the CDC ’ s infectious disease unit , affirmed that even though Gilead and Moderna might be ready , or almost ready , for Phase 1 trials , the US likely won ’ t have a workable vaccine for another year to 18 months .
And on Thursday , a team of Israeli scientists one-upped the US , boasting that they could have a vaccine ready “ in a few weeks.
” According to a statement cited by the Jerusalem Post , a team of Israeli scientists are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine against the novel coronavirus , according to Israel ’ s Science and Technology Minister , Ofir Akunis .
If all goes as planned , the vaccine could be ready within a few weeks and available for human use in 90 days .
For four years , a team of scientists at MIGAL has been developing a vaccine to combat infectious bronchitis virus ( IBV ) , which causes a bronchial disease affecting poultry .
The effectiveness of the vaccine has been demonstrated during preclinical trials carried out at the Veterinary Institute .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ process for developing new vaccines that they expect will help facilitate a novel coronavirus vaccine in world-beating time .
Here ’ s how the team discovered their project would be useful for the coronavirus vaccine .
In preclinical trials , the team demonstrated that the oral vaccination induces high levels of specific anti-IBV antibodies , Katz said .
“ Let ’ s call it pure luck , ” he said .
“ We decided to choose coronavirus as a model for our system just as a proof of concept for our technology.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the novel coronavirus causing the current worldwide outbreak , the MIGAL researchers examined it and found that the poultry coronavirus has high genetic similarity to the human one , and that it uses the same infection mechanism , which increases the likelihood of achieving an effective human vaccine in a very short period of time , Katz said .
“ All we need to do is adjust the system to the new sequence , ” he said .
“ We are in the middle of this process , and hopefully in a few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our hands .
Yes , in a few weeks , if it all works , we would have a vaccine to prevent coronavirus.
” Akunis said his government has ‘ fast-tracked ’ all the approval processes for the vaccine to get it out as soon as possible .
MIGAL would be responsible for developing the new vaccine , but it would then have to go through a regulatory process , including clinical trials and large-scale production , Katz said .
Akunis said he has instructed his ministry ’ s director-general to fast-track all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the human vaccine to market as quickly as possible .
“ Given the urgent global need for a human coronavirus vaccine , we are doing everything we can to accelerate development , ” MIGAL CEO David Zigdon said .
The vaccine could “ achieve safety approval in 90 days , ” he said .
It will be an oral vaccine , making it particularly accessible to the general public , Zigdon said .
“ We are currently in intensive discussions with potential partners that can help accelerate the in-human trials phase and expedite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he said .
Israel has only confirmed a handful of cases among travelers who visited South Korea and Italy ( one case they confirmed on Thursday ) .
We wonder : If Israel does roll out a vaccine , will it share it with Iran ?
This article originally appeared on Zero Hedge .

Renegade Editor’s Note: How convenient. Thanks jews!
(ZH) Yesterday, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the CDC’s infectious disease unit, affirmed that even though Gilead and Moderna might be ready, or almost ready, for Phase 1 trials, the US likely won’t have a workable vaccine for another year to 18 months.
And on Thursday, a team of Israeli scientists one-upped the US, boasting that they could have a vaccine ready “in a few weeks.”
According to a statement cited by the Jerusalem Post, a team of Israeli scientists are on the cusp of developing the first vaccine against the novel coronavirus, according to Israel’s Science and Technology Minister, Ofir Akunis. If all goes as planned, the vaccine could be ready within a few weeks and available for human use in 90 days.
“Congratulations to MIGAL [The Galilee Research Institute] on this exciting breakthrough,” Akunis said. “I am confident there will be further rapid progress, enabling us to provide a needed response to the grave global COVID-19 threat,” Akunis said.
For four years, a team of scientists at MIGAL has been developing a vaccine to combat infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), which causes a bronchial disease affecting poultry. The effectiveness of the vaccine has been demonstrated during preclinical trials carried out at the Veterinary Institute.
During the process, they discovered a process for developing new vaccines that they expect will help facilitate a novel coronavirus vaccine in world-beating time.
“Our basic concept was to develop the technology and not specifically a vaccine for this kind or that kind of virus,” said Dr. Chen Katz, MIGAL’s biotechnology group leader. “The scientific framework for the vaccine is based on a new protein expression vector, which forms and secretes a chimeric soluble protein that delivers the viral antigen into mucosal tissues by self-activated endocytosis, causing the body to form antibodies against the virus.”
Here’s how the team discovered their project would be useful for the coronavirus vaccine.
In preclinical trials, the team demonstrated that the oral vaccination induces high levels of specific anti-IBV antibodies, Katz said. “Let’s call it pure luck,” he said. “We decided to choose coronavirus as a model for our system just as a proof of concept for our technology.” But after scientists sequenced the DNA of the novel coronavirus causing the current worldwide outbreak, the MIGAL researchers examined it and found that the poultry coronavirus has high genetic similarity to the human one, and that it uses the same infection mechanism, which increases the likelihood of achieving an effective human vaccine in a very short period of time, Katz said. “All we need to do is adjust the system to the new sequence,” he said. “We are in the middle of this process, and hopefully in a few weeks we will have the vaccine in our hands. Yes, in a few weeks, if it all works, we would have a vaccine to prevent coronavirus.”
Akunis said his government has ‘fast-tracked’ all the approval processes for the vaccine to get it out as soon as possible.
MIGAL would be responsible for developing the new vaccine, but it would then have to go through a regulatory process, including clinical trials and large-scale production, Katz said. Akunis said he has instructed his ministry’s director-general to fast-track all approval processes with the goal of bringing the human vaccine to market as quickly as possible. “Given the urgent global need for a human coronavirus vaccine, we are doing everything we can to accelerate development,” MIGAL CEO David Zigdon said. The vaccine could “achieve safety approval in 90 days,” he said. It will be an oral vaccine, making it particularly accessible to the general public, Zigdon said. “We are currently in intensive discussions with potential partners that can help accelerate the in-human trials phase and expedite completion of final-product development and regulatory activities,” he said.
Israel has only confirmed a handful of cases among travelers who visited South Korea and Italy (one case they confirmed on Thursday). We wonder: If Israel does roll out a vaccine, will it share it with Iran?
This article originally appeared on Zero Hedge.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-02-27--Ludwig Spohr – German Violinist, Conductor and Composer

Renegade Editor ’ s Note : Ludwig was recommended to me by someone via email .
If you have any favorite artists that have not been featured yet , send me a note .
Louis Spohr , original name Ludwig Spohr , ( born April 5 , 1784 , Brunswick , Brunswick [ Germany ] —died Oct. 22 , 1859 , Kassel , Hesse [ Germany ] ) , German violinist , composer , and conductor whose compositions illustrate an early aspect of the Romantic period in German music .
Spohr taught himself composition by studying the scores of Wolfgang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the leader of the Brunswick orchestra and in 1802 with Franz Eck , who took him on a tour of Russia .
He toured Italy with the great violin virtuoso Niccolò Paganini and in 1817 became conductor of the opera in Frankfurt am Main .
In 1820 Spohr made the first of his six tours of England .
He became court conductor at Kassel in 1821 .
In his later years his political radicalism incurred the displeasure of his patron , the elector of Hesse-Kassel , who pensioned him in 1857 .
Shortly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and was no longer able to play the violin .
( Bio from Britannica )

Renegade Editor’s Note: Ludwig was recommended to me by someone via email. If you have any favorite artists that have not been featured yet, send me a note.
Louis Spohr, original name Ludwig Spohr, (born April 5, 1784, Brunswick, Brunswick [Germany]—died Oct. 22, 1859, Kassel, Hesse [Germany]), German violinist, composer, and conductor whose compositions illustrate an early aspect of the Romantic period in German music.
Spohr taught himself composition by studying the scores of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. He studied violin with the leader of the Brunswick orchestra and in 1802 with Franz Eck, who took him on a tour of Russia. He toured Italy with the great violin virtuoso Niccolò Paganini and in 1817 became conductor of the opera in Frankfurt am Main. In 1820 Spohr made the first of his six tours of England. He became court conductor at Kassel in 1821. In his later years his political radicalism incurred the displeasure of his patron, the elector of Hesse-Kassel, who pensioned him in 1857. Shortly afterward, he broke his left arm and was no longer able to play the violin. (Bio from Britannica)
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-02-27--Magical Ed Mosberg Tells Mike Cuckabee About How He Escaped Certain Death Many Times

This guy really is amazing .
I love his outfit .
His delivery is impeccable .
His stories are gripping @ @ @ @ @ even better than Irene Zisblatt .
Anyone who questions him should be executed .

This guy really is amazing. I love his outfit. His delivery is impeccable. His stories are gripping. I think he is even better than Irene Zisblatt. Anyone who questions him should be executed.


renegadetribune--2020-02-27--Is Wall Street Behind the Delay in Declaring the Coronavirus Outbreak a “Pandemic”?

A little known specialized bond created in 2017 by the World Bank may hold the answer as to why U.S. and global health authorities have declined to label the global spread of the novel coronavirus a “ pandemic.
” Those bonds , now often referred to as “ pandemic bonds , ” were ostensibly intended to transfer the risk of potential pandemics in low-income nations to financial markets .
Yet , in light of the growing coronavirus outbreak , the investors who purchased those products could lose millions if global health authorities were to use that label in relation to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On Tuesday , federal health officials at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) announced that they are preparing for a “ potential pandemic ” of the novel coronavirus that first appeared in China late last year .
The World Health Organization ( WHO ) has stated that an estimated 80,000 worldwide have contracted the disease , most of them in China , while more than 2,700 have died .
However , some have argued that the CDC ’ s concerns about a likely pandemic have come too late and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ earlier .
For instance , in early February , Dr. Anthony Fauci , director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease , had told the New York Times that the novel coronavirus is “ very , very transmissible , and it almost certainly is going to be a pandemic , ” while former CDC director Dr. Thomas R. Frieden had echoed those concerns at the time , stating that it is “ increasingly unlikely that the virus can be contained.
” Despite those warnings , among many others , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus could spread throughout the United States .
Their Tuesday announcement riled markets , wiping out $ 1.7 trillion in stock market value in just two days .
The CDC ’ s warning has reportedly angered President Trump , who accused the agency of needlessly spooking financial markets .
Notably , WHO officials have taken an even more cautious approach than the CDC in their recent comments , stating that it is still “ too early ” to declare the coronavirus outbreak a “ pandemic ” while also asserting that “ it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do in preparing for a pandemic.
” The refusal to label the outbreak a pandemic is odd , since it refers to an epidemic or actively spreading disease that affects two or more regions worldwide .
This currently describes the geographical spread of the highly contagious novel coronavirus , which has now resulted in significant clusters of cases far from China , namely in Italy and Iran .
Countries closer to China , like South Korea , have also recently experienced an explosion in novel coronavirus infections .
It is possible that concerns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could upset global markets and lead to economic turmoil , similar to what happened to the U.S. stock market following the CDC announcement on Tuesday .
Though such concerns are valid , there is also evidence that a particular class of bonds issued by the World Bank that are closely related to official declarations of pandemics may also be responsible for having steered WHO and CDC officials away from using this term , even though the consequences of doing so could negatively impact global public health .
In June 2017 , the World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bonds ” that would be used to fund the previously created Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility ( PEF ) in the event of an officially-recognized ( i.e .
WHO-recognized ) pandemic .
They were essentially sold under the premise that those who invested in the bonds would lose their money if any of six deadly pandemics hit , including coronavirus .
Yet , if a pandemic did not occur before the bonds mature on July 15 , 2020 , investors would receive what they had originally paid for the bonds back in addition to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they recieve between the date of purchase and the bond ’ s maturation date .
The PEF , which these pandemic bonds fund , was created by the World Bank “ to channel surge funding to developing countries facing the risk of a pandemic ” and the creation of these so-called “ pandemic bonds ” was intended to transfer pandemic risk in low-income countries to global financial markets .
According to a World Bank press release on the launch of the bonds , WHO backed the World Bank ’ s initiative .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ these “ pandemic bonds ” than meets the eye .
For example , PEF has a “ unique financing structure [ that ] combines funding from the bonds issued today with over-the-counter derivatives that transfer pandemic outbreak risk to derivative counterparties.
” The World Bank asserted that this structure was used in order “ to attract a wider , more diverse set of investors.
” Critics , however , have called the unnecessarily convoluted system “ World-Bank-enabled looting ” that enriches intermediaries and investors instead of the funds intended targets , in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic .
These critics have asked why not merely give these funds to a body like the Contingency Fund for Emergencies at the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , where the funds could go directly to affected countries in need .
Notably , WHO determines if a pandemic meets the criteria that would see investors ’ money be funneled into PEF as opposed to their own pockets , which would take place if no pandemic is declared between now and when the bonds are set to mature this upcoming July .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the mechanism of “ pandemic bonds ” as follows : In 2017 , the World Bank issued $ 425 million in these “ pandemic bonds ” and the bond sale was reported to have been 200 percent oversubscribed , “ with investors eager to get their hands on the high-yield returns on offer , ” according to reports .
The premiums bondholders have received thus far were largely funded by the governments of Japan and Germany , who are also the top nation-state funders of WHO behind the United States and United Kingdom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bondholders are firms and individuals based in Europe .
Some analysts have argued that these pandemic bonds were never intended to aid low-income pandemic-stricken countries , but instead to enrich Wall Street investors .
For instance , American economic forecaster Martin Armstrong has called the World Bank ’ s pandemic bonds “ a giant gamble in the global financial casino ” and a “ scheme like no other , ” recently arguing that these bonds could present a “ a structured derivative time bomb ” that could upend financial markets if a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ went on to say that it is in WHO ’ s interest to declare the coronavirus outbreak a pandemic , but noted that , in doing so , they would cause bondholders to take significant losses .
Even establishment economists like former World Bank chief economist and Secretary of Treasury Larry Summers have criticized the World Bank ’ s program , dismissing the PEF as “ financial goofiness.
” Bodo Ellmers , the director of the Global Policy Forum ’ s sustainable development finance program , has similarly called pandemic bonds “ useless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked at the World Bank as an economist for over 30 years , said the program was “ designed to fail ” because the bonds were crafted in order “ to reduce the probability of payout.
” Economic and business analyst and host of the podcast “ Quoth the Raven ” Chris Irons told MintPress News that , with respect to the pandemic bonds , “ What ’ s important is to focus on who stands to benefit from this not being declared a pandemic , ” a difficult task given that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ publicly available .
Irons also noted that , in his opinion , “ WHO and the CDC have been caught a little flat-footed here ” and that some governments that fund WHO , particularly the Trump administration , appear “ more concerned with the stock market than giving people information that may be necessary and vital.
” He added that behind-closed-doors pressure on WHO by those who stand to lose financially from an official declaration of a pandemic would be “ unsurprising.
” As the coronavirus outbreak grows , concern has grown among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to countries affected by coronavirus will be triggered , despite the clear delay by WHO in declaring the outbreak as a pandemic .
While WHO could theoretically alter the criteria that would trigger payout and cause bondholders to lose big , some recent reports have claimed that bondholders are seeking to rid themselves of the bonds prior to their July maturation date .
German media outlet Deutsche-Welle noted that the trigger for the first class of pandemic bonds , valued at $ 225 million , would normally have already been met due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a “ developing country.
” However , WHO has said this does not meet said criterion because it does not consider China to be a developing country , even though the World Bank ’ s own criteria do consider China to be a developing country .
For the second and riskier category of pandemic bonds , those bonds are triggered when the disease in question crosses an international border and causes more than 20 deaths in the second country .
At the time of publication of this article , Iran has recorded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have triggered this second category of pandemic bonds , valued at $ 95 million .
Yet , WHO yet to comment on how this criterion for the second category bonds has been met .
The WHO ’ s decision to refuse to use the “ p-word ” may be the result of several factors , though the pandemic bonds loom large as a $ 425 million incentive for not doing so .
While avoiding the use of the term may please pandemic bondholders , it is set to have major negative consequences for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that early action against epidemic and pandemic outbreaks is widely considered to be an imperative .
Feature photo | A worker wearing a protective suit sprays disinfectant as a precaution against the coronavirus at a bus garage in Seoul , South Korea , Feb. 26 , 2020 .
Ahn Young-joon | AP Whitney Webb is a MintPress News journalist based in Chile .
She has contributed to several independent media outlets including Global Research , EcoWatch , the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire , among others .
She has made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2019 winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism .

By Whitney Webb
A little known specialized bond created in 2017 by the World Bank may hold the answer as to why U.S. and global health authorities have declined to label the global spread of the novel coronavirus a “pandemic.” Those bonds, now often referred to as “pandemic bonds,” were ostensibly intended to transfer the risk of potential pandemics in low-income nations to financial markets.
Yet, in light of the growing coronavirus outbreak, the investors who purchased those products could lose millions if global health authorities were to use that label in relation to the surge in global coronavirus cases.
On Tuesday, federal health officials at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that they are preparing for a “potential pandemic” of the novel coronavirus that first appeared in China late last year. The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that an estimated 80,000 worldwide have contracted the disease, most of them in China, while more than 2,700 have died.
However, some have argued that the CDC’s concerns about a likely pandemic have come too late and that action should have been taken much earlier. For instance, in early February, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, had told the New York Times that the novel coronavirus is “very, very transmissible, and it almost certainly is going to be a pandemic,” while former CDC director Dr. Thomas R. Frieden had echoed those concerns at the time, stating that it is “increasingly unlikely that the virus can be contained.”
Despite those warnings, among many others, the CDC waited to announce its concerns that the virus could spread throughout the United States. Their Tuesday announcement riled markets, wiping out $1.7 trillion in stock market value in just two days. The CDC’s warning has reportedly angered President Trump, who accused the agency of needlessly spooking financial markets.
Notably, WHO officials have taken an even more cautious approach than the CDC in their recent comments, stating that it is still “too early” to declare the coronavirus outbreak a “pandemic” while also asserting that “it is time to do everything you would do in preparing for a pandemic.”
The refusal to label the outbreak a pandemic is odd, since it refers to an epidemic or actively spreading disease that affects two or more regions worldwide. This currently describes the geographical spread of the highly contagious novel coronavirus, which has now resulted in significant clusters of cases far from China, namely in Italy and Iran. Countries closer to China, like South Korea, have also recently experienced an explosion in novel coronavirus infections.
It is possible that concerns over using the word “pandemic” could upset global markets and lead to economic turmoil, similar to what happened to the U.S. stock market following the CDC announcement on Tuesday. Though such concerns are valid, there is also evidence that a particular class of bonds issued by the World Bank that are closely related to official declarations of pandemics may also be responsible for having steered WHO and CDC officials away from using this term, even though the consequences of doing so could negatively impact global public health.
Pandemic Bonds: a “scheme like no other”
In June 2017, the World Bank announced the creation of “specialized bonds” that would be used to fund the previously created Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF) in the event of an officially-recognized (i.e. WHO-recognized) pandemic.
They were essentially sold under the premise that those who invested in the bonds would lose their money if any of six deadly pandemics hit, including coronavirus. Yet, if a pandemic did not occur before the bonds mature on July 15, 2020, investors would receive what they had originally paid for the bonds back in addition to interest and premium payments on those bonds that they recieve between the date of purchase and the bond’s maturation date.
The PEF, which these pandemic bonds fund, was created by the World Bank “to channel surge funding to developing countries facing the risk of a pandemic” and the creation of these so-called “pandemic bonds” was intended to transfer pandemic risk in low-income countries to global financial markets. According to a World Bank press release on the launch of the bonds, WHO backed the World Bank’s initiative.
However, there is much more to these “pandemic bonds” than meets the eye. For example, PEF has a “unique financing structure [that] combines funding from the bonds issued today with over-the-counter derivatives that transfer pandemic outbreak risk to derivative counterparties.” The World Bank asserted that this structure was used in order “to attract a wider, more diverse set of investors.”
Critics, however, have called the unnecessarily convoluted system “World-Bank-enabled looting” that enriches intermediaries and investors instead of the funds intended targets, in this case low-income countries struggling to fight a pandemic. These critics have asked why not merely give these funds to a body like the Contingency Fund for Emergencies at the World Health Organization (WHO), where the funds could go directly to affected countries in need.
Notably, WHO determines if a pandemic meets the criteria that would see investors’ money be funneled into PEF as opposed to their own pockets, which would take place if no pandemic is declared between now and when the bonds are set to mature this upcoming July.
In 2017, the news site Quartz described the mechanism of “pandemic bonds” as follows:
Investors buy the bonds and receive regular coupons payments in return. If there is an outbreak of disease, the investors don’t get their initial money back. There are two varieties of debt, both scheduled to mature in July 2020. The first bond raised $225 million and features an interest rate of around 7%. Payout on the bond is suspended if there is an outbreak of new influenza viruses or coronaviridae (SARS, MERS). The second, riskier bond raised $95 million at an interest rate of more than 11%. This bond keeps investors’ money if there is an outbreak of Filovirus, Coronavirus, Lassa Fever, Rift Valley Fever, and/or Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever. The World Bank also issued $105 million in swap derivatives that work in a similar way. (emphasis added)”
In 2017, the World Bank issued $425 million in these “pandemic bonds” and the bond sale was reported to have been 200 percent oversubscribed, “with investors eager to get their hands on the high-yield returns on offer,” according to reports. The premiums bondholders have received thus far were largely funded by the governments of Japan and Germany, who are also the top nation-state funders of WHO behind the United States and United Kingdom. Reports have claimed that most of the bondholders are firms and individuals based in Europe.
Some analysts have argued that these pandemic bonds were never intended to aid low-income pandemic-stricken countries, but instead to enrich Wall Street investors. For instance, American economic forecaster Martin Armstrong has called the World Bank’s pandemic bonds “a giant gamble in the global financial casino” and a “scheme like no other,” recently arguing that these bonds could present a “a structured derivative time bomb” that could upend financial markets if a pandemic is declared by WHO. Armstrong went on to say that it is in WHO’s interest to declare the coronavirus outbreak a pandemic, but noted that, in doing so, they would cause bondholders to take significant losses.
Even establishment economists like former World Bank chief economist and Secretary of Treasury Larry Summers have criticized the World Bank’s program, dismissing the PEF as “financial goofiness.” Bodo Ellmers, the director of the Global Policy Forum’s sustainable development finance program, has similarly called pandemic bonds “useless,” while Olga Jonas, who worked at the World Bank as an economist for over 30 years, said the program was “designed to fail” because the bonds were crafted in order “to reduce the probability of payout.”
Economic and business analyst and host of the podcast “Quoth the Raven” Chris Irons told MintPress News that, with respect to the pandemic bonds, “What’s important is to focus on who stands to benefit from this not being declared a pandemic,” a difficult task given that the identity of most bondholders are not currently publicly available.
Irons also noted that, in his opinion, “WHO and the CDC have been caught a little flat-footed here” and that some governments that fund WHO, particularly the Trump administration, appear “more concerned with the stock market than giving people information that may be necessary and vital.” He added that behind-closed-doors pressure on WHO by those who stand to lose financially from an official declaration of a pandemic would be “unsurprising.”
How to trigger a payout
As the coronavirus outbreak grows, concern has grown among those invested in pandemic bonds that payout to countries affected by coronavirus will be triggered, despite the clear delay by WHO in declaring the outbreak as a pandemic. While WHO could theoretically alter the criteria that would trigger payout and cause bondholders to lose big, some recent reports have claimed that bondholders are seeking to rid themselves of the bonds prior to their July maturation date.
German media outlet Deutsche-Welle noted that the trigger for the first class of pandemic bonds, valued at $225 million, would normally have already been met due to the criterion of more than 2,500 deaths in a “developing country.” However, WHO has said this does not meet said criterion because it does not consider China to be a developing country, even though the World Bank’s own criteria do consider China to be a developing country.
For the second and riskier category of pandemic bonds, those bonds are triggered when the disease in question crosses an international border and causes more than 20 deaths in the second country. At the time of publication of this article, Iran has recorded at least 50 deaths, which should have triggered this second category of pandemic bonds, valued at $95 million. Yet, WHO yet to comment on how this criterion for the second category bonds has been met.
The WHO’s decision to refuse to use the “p-word” may be the result of several factors, though the pandemic bonds loom large as a $425 million incentive for not doing so. While avoiding the use of the term may please pandemic bondholders, it is set to have major negative consequences for global public health, particularly given the fact that early action against epidemic and pandemic outbreaks is widely considered to be an imperative.
Feature photo | A worker wearing a protective suit sprays disinfectant as a precaution against the coronavirus at a bus garage in Seoul, South Korea, Feb. 26, 2020. Ahn Young-joon | AP
Whitney Webb is a MintPress News journalist based in Chile. She has contributed to several independent media outlets including Global Research, EcoWatch, the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others. She has made several radio and television appearances and is the 2019 winner of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-02-27--Germany Could Fine Social Media Firms up to €50,000,000 Over ‘Hate Speech’

“ The bill would require companies like Facebook and YouTube to report anti-Semitism , threats of violence and rape and @ @ @ @ @ the police… ”

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-02-27--New Survey Claims 148 Million Europeans Think a Secret jewish Cabal Runs the World

Smart people don ’ t think that jews run the world – they know it !
And is the cabal really that much of a secret ?
The Action and Protection League , based out of Hungary , commissioned a survey of 16,000 Europeans to study just how “ anti-semitic ” they have become .
1,000 people were interviewed from 16 different European countries , including Austria , Belgium , the Czech Republic , France , Germany , the United Kingdom and Poland .
The findings were presented at the European Jewish Association ’ s conference in Paris on Monday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these numbers are quite hopeful for our cause , we should never believe jewish surveys , especially when the goal is to show how the “ plague ” of “ anti-semitism ” has spread and needs to be stamped out through government action .
I quote the findings from the Daily Mail : Supposing that there are around 740 million Europeans , this would mean that 148 million people in Europe know the score .
They don ’ t ?
Why else would they have “ survivors ” out there kvetching endlessly and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Palestinian homes in “ skunk spray , ” bombing innocent Palestinians into oblivion ( including in schools and hospitals ) , sniping them for even coming close to the border of their ancestral homeland while unarmed , imprisoning and torturing children without any charges , forcing them to live in an open air concentration camp , etc.
, all while making “ goyim ” taxpayers foot the bill for the atrocities – how could anyone think this could engender hatred ?
While jews were being fed and clothed in camps like Auschwitz – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have a friendly soccer match with guards , and swim in the Olympic size swimming pool – Germans were being burned alive in firebombing campaigns across the countryside , and the rest of Europe was ravaged by the war , with tens of millions of soldiers and citizens losing their lives in a war instigated by jewish supremacists .
I ’ m sick of the lies of the Holocaust , which allows for jews to hide the facts about the horrors visited upon Europe in WW2 , as well as the atrocities that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like the Holodomor and red terror .
The “ goyim ” are starting to think we rule over them .
Let ’ s use our control of their governments to have their leaders crack down on them so they get this crazy idea that we control things out of their heads .
Do they really think that these measures will reduce the number of people who are averse to being ruled by jews ?
Perhaps fewer people will report their “ anti-semitic ” thoughts for a survey , since they don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their homes , murdering them for not loving their jewish overlords ( the penalty for “ anti-semitism ” in the Soviet Union was death ) , but these moves will assuredly lead to even more people knowing the truth .
Rabbi Menachem Margolin , chairman of the association , said : Margolin is admitting here that jews can bend the governments of Europe to their will , therefore proving the “ anti-semitic conspiracy theorists ” right .
The Daily Mail goes on to kvetch about how jews are feeling worried about all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to bend over backwards and give up even more of their rights to make them feel safer .

Smart people don’t think that jews run the world – they know it! And is the cabal really that much of a secret?
The Action and Protection League, based out of Hungary, commissioned a survey of 16,000 Europeans to study just how “anti-semitic” they have become. 1,000 people were interviewed from 16 different European countries, including Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Poland. The findings were presented at the European Jewish Association’s conference in Paris on Monday.
Just to be clear, although these numbers are quite hopeful for our cause, we should never believe jewish surveys, especially when the goal is to show how the “plague” of “anti-semitism” has spread and needs to be stamped out through government action.
I quote the findings from the Daily Mail:
A fifth of Europeans believe that a secretive Jewish cabal controls world politics and economics…
Supposing that there are around 740 million Europeans, this would mean that 148 million people in Europe know the score.
The same number also believe that Jews ‘exploit Holocaust victimhood for their own needs’
They don’t? Why else would they have “survivors” out there kvetching endlessly and demanding more reparations and legislation?
a quarter of respondents agreed with the statement: ‘Israel’s policies make me understand why some people hate Jews’.
Covering Palestinian homes in “skunk spray,” bombing innocent Palestinians into oblivion (including in schools and hospitals), sniping them for even coming close to the border of their ancestral homeland while unarmed, imprisoning and torturing children without any charges, forcing them to live in an open air concentration camp, etc., all while making “goyim” taxpayers foot the bill for the atrocities – how could anyone think this could engender hatred?
More than a third agreed with the assertion that ‘during World War II, people from our nation suffered as much as Jews.’
While jews were being fed and clothed in camps like Auschwitz – where they could put on plays, have a friendly soccer match with guards, and swim in the Olympic size swimming pool – Germans were being burned alive in firebombing campaigns across the countryside, and the rest of Europe was ravaged by the war, with tens of millions of soldiers and citizens losing their lives in a war instigated by jewish supremacists. I’m sick of the lies of the Holocaust, which allows for jews to hide the facts about the horrors visited upon Europe in WW2, as well as the atrocities that took place before by the jewish bolsheviks, like the Holodomor and red terror.
The European Jewish Association have now called on all European leaders to adopt its action plan to combat anti-Semitism.
The “goyim” are starting to think we rule over them. Let’s use our control of their governments to have their leaders crack down on them so they get this crazy idea that we control things out of their heads.
The plan includes adopting the the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of anti-Semitism… Other elements of the plan include appointing a special envoy on combating anti-Semitism; mandating schools include lessons on anti-Semitism; and legislating bans on anti-Semitic symbols in public, including Nazi imagery.
Do they really think that these measures will reduce the number of people who are averse to being ruled by jews? Perhaps fewer people will report their “anti-semitic” thoughts for a survey, since they don’t want the new NKVD barging into their homes, murdering them for not loving their jewish overlords (the penalty for “anti-semitism” in the Soviet Union was death), but these moves will assuredly lead to even more people knowing the truth.
Rabbi Menachem Margolin, chairman of the association, said:
We as Jewish communities cannot eradicate anti-Semitism on our own. After 20 years dealing with this subject, I’ve come to the understanding that no matter how many schools we visit, and no matter how many delegations we bring to Auschwitz, it’s all just a drop in the bucket. Therefore we realized that the way to fight anti-Semitism is to pass on the responsibility to European governments.”
Margolin is admitting here that jews can bend the governments of Europe to their will, therefore proving the “anti-semitic conspiracy theorists” right.
The Daily Mail goes on to kvetch about how jews are feeling worried about all the “hate” and so everyone needs to bend over backwards and give up even more of their rights to make them feel safer.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-02-27--Saudi Monarch Hosts Israeli Rabbi in Royal Palace

( MEMO ) A rabbi from Jerusalem met with King Salman Ibn Abdulaziz Al-Saud of Saudi Arabia in the royal palace in the capital Riyadh last week , marking the first time that such meeting has taken place in recent history .
The Saudi monarch hosted David Rosen , a rabbi born in Britain who moved to Israel a number of years ago to become the member of the Israeli Chief Rabbinate ’ s Commission for Interreligious Dialogue .
The meeting was held alongside figures representing other faith groups as part of a two-and-a-half-day visit to the Kingdom , during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ King Abdullah International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue ( KAICIID ) gathered .
Based in Vienna , the Centre was established eight years ago , but this was the first time that a Saudi monarch has actually invited the board to the palace .
Speaking to the Jerusalem Post , Rosen said , “ [ The King ] invoked the historical and authentic character of Islam as the openness of Islam that was shut down in recent times by political factors.
” He added that his visit does not create a new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reality , and it is testimony to a new openness in Saudi Arabia.
” This is not the first time that such an interfaith visit to Saudi Arabia has taken place , however , as Jerusalem-based Christian interfaith activist Joel C. Rosenberg visited Jeddah with a delegation of American Evangelical Christians last September .
Rosenberg praised Rosen ’ s trip and King Salman ’ s hosting of the group , saying : “ I think it ’ s enormously significant that the Saudis are continuing to pursue interfaith delegations and dialogue… The meeting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of particular significance , because as far as I know it ’ s the first time the king has met with one of these interfaith delegations.
” He pointed out that there is a long way to go , but these are very significant movements .
“ I hope that the Saudis will continue to build on them ; I believe they will.
” The meeting comes at a time when the Kingdom has been fostering ever-closer ties with Israel and the global Jewish community as part of its efforts to open itself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more “ moderate ” form of religion in the Gulf State .
It follows other such recent gestures , including the visit to Auschwitz by the secretary-general of the Muslim World League , Sheikh Mohammed Bin Abdul Karim Al-Issa , in January , and the visit of a US Jewish umbrella group to Saudi Arabia earlier this month .

(MEMO) A rabbi from Jerusalem met with King Salman Ibn Abdulaziz Al-Saud of Saudi Arabia in the royal palace in the capital Riyadh last week, marking the first time that such meeting has taken place in recent history. The Saudi monarch hosted David Rosen, a rabbi born in Britain who moved to Israel a number of years ago to become the member of the Israeli Chief Rabbinate’s Commission for Interreligious Dialogue.
The meeting was held alongside figures representing other faith groups as part of a two-and-a-half-day visit to the Kingdom, during which the board of directors of the King Abdullah International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue (KAICIID) gathered. Based in Vienna, the Centre was established eight years ago, but this was the first time that a Saudi monarch has actually invited the board to the palace.
Speaking to the Jerusalem Post, Rosen said, “[The King] invoked the historical and authentic character of Islam as the openness of Islam that was shut down in recent times by political factors.” He added that his visit does not create a new reality. “It reflects a new reality, and it is testimony to a new openness in Saudi Arabia.”
READ: Is Mohammad Bin Salman a Zionist?
This is not the first time that such an interfaith visit to Saudi Arabia has taken place, however, as Jerusalem-based Christian interfaith activist Joel C. Rosenberg visited Jeddah with a delegation of American Evangelical Christians last September. Rosenberg praised Rosen’s trip and King Salman’s hosting of the group, saying: “I think it’s enormously significant that the Saudis are continuing to pursue interfaith delegations and dialogue… The meeting between the rabbi and the king is of particular significance, because as far as I know it’s the first time the king has met with one of these interfaith delegations.”
He pointed out that there is a long way to go, but these are very significant movements. “I hope that the Saudis will continue to build on them; I believe they will.”
The meeting comes at a time when the Kingdom has been fostering ever-closer ties with Israel and the global Jewish community as part of its efforts to open itself up to the world and re-assert a more “moderate” form of religion in the Gulf State. It follows other such recent gestures, including the visit to Auschwitz by the secretary-general of the Muslim World League, Sheikh Mohammed Bin Abdul Karim Al-Issa, in January, and the visit of a US Jewish umbrella group to Saudi Arabia earlier this month.
This article originally appeared on Middle East Monitor.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-02-26--Binge Watching Is Associated With a 12 Percent Increased Risk of Inflammatory-Related Death

I ’ m sure that you hesitated before choosing to read this article , as most of us have been sucked into a binge watching marathon on more than one occasion ( myself included ) .
While it may seem like we ’ re buckling down to give ourselves a break , we may actually be hurting ourselves far more than we realize .
Sitting for prolonged periods of time has proven to be harmful to our bodies , especially for adults over 50 , and when you match lounging with television , you create a deadly combo .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , researchers examined more than 8,900 adults and found that each additional hour of TV viewing was associated with a 12 % increased risk of inflammatory-related death , and those who spent more than four hours a day watching TV were at an even higher risk .
This includes diabetes , respiratory , cognitive , and kidney diseases .
( source ) In general , watching television has proven to negatively impact mental health ; it alters your brain , lowers your attention span , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aggressive .
You don ’ t need to experience the “ trance-like ” state television can put us in , but I ’ m sure you ’ ve witnessed it before .
This trance occurs roughly 30 seconds after you start watching TV .
Your brain begins by producing alpha waves , leading to a light hypnotic state that makes the viewer less aware of their environment and more open to subtle messages — aka programming .
In the 1990s .
Dr. Teresa Belton , a visiting fellow at the University of East @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has on the imagination of 10-12 year old children , ultimately concluding that television negatively impacts their development : “ The ubiquity and ease of access to television and videos perhaps robs today ’ s children of the need to pursue their own thoughts and devise their own occupations , distracting them from inner processes and constantly demanding responses to external agendas , and suggests that this may have implications for the development of imaginative capacity.
” And these physical affects are becoming increasingly apparent .
Not only does it eventually lead to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the risk of creating inflammation in the body , you are susceptible to a host of diseases including kidney disease , diabetes , asthma , Alzheimer ’ s , and even depression .
Dr. Megan Grace is the lead investigator at the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute in Melbourne .
Between 1999 and 2000 , her team quizzed adult participants about their viewing habits via a questionnaire .
Again , this was before we had access to popular streaming websites like Netflix .
The participants were separated into three groups based on their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hours per day , greater than two hours but less than four hours , and more than four hours .
“ TV time was associated with increased risk of inflammatory-related mortality .
This is consistent with the hypothesis that high TV viewing may be associated with a chronic inflammatory state , ” the authors wrote .
They followed up with their participants 12 years later and found , of 909 deaths , 130 were inflammatory-related .
Of the inflammatory-related deaths , 21 were from diseases of the respiratory system and 18 of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between two to four hours of TV a day showed a 54 % higher risk of inflammatory-related death .
Additionally , people who watched more than four hours of TV a day doubled their risk of dying from an inflammatory disease compared to those who watched two hours .
In addition to cutting down the amount of time you spend sitting in front of the TV and sitting or lying down , you can help combat inflammation with a number of foods like avocados , berries , sweet potato , onions , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ginger , rosemary , and turmeric .

By
I’m sure that you hesitated before choosing to read this article, as most of us have been sucked into a binge watching marathon on more than one occasion (myself included). While it may seem like we’re buckling down to give ourselves a break, we may actually be hurting ourselves far more than we realize. Sitting for prolonged periods of time has proven to be harmful to our bodies, especially for adults over 50, and when you match lounging with television, you create a deadly combo.
In an Australian study published in the journal Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, researchers examined more than 8,900 adults and found that each additional hour of TV viewing was associated with a 12% increased risk of inflammatory-related death, and those who spent more than four hours a day watching TV were at an even higher risk. This includes diabetes, respiratory, cognitive, and kidney diseases. (source)
In general, watching television has proven to negatively impact mental health; it alters your brain, lowers your attention span, and has the potential to make you more aggressive. You don’t need to experience the “trance-like” state television can put us in, but I’m sure you’ve witnessed it before. This trance occurs roughly 30 seconds after you start watching TV. Your brain begins by producing alpha waves, leading to a light hypnotic state that makes the viewer less aware of their environment and more open to subtle messages — aka programming.
In the 1990s. Dr. Teresa Belton, a visiting fellow at the University of East Anglia, studied the effects that television has on the imagination of 10-12 year old children, ultimately concluding that television negatively impacts their development: “The ubiquity and ease of access to television and videos perhaps robs today’s children of the need to pursue their own thoughts and devise their own occupations, distracting them from inner processes and constantly demanding responses to external agendas, and suggests that this may have implications for the development of imaginative capacity.”
And these physical affects are becoming increasingly apparent. Not only does it eventually lead to immobility as you age, but with the risk of creating inflammation in the body, you are susceptible to a host of diseases including kidney disease, diabetes, asthma, Alzheimer’s, and even depression.
Dr. Megan Grace is the lead investigator at the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute in Melbourne. Between 1999 and 2000, her team quizzed adult participants about their viewing habits via a questionnaire. Again, this was before we had access to popular streaming websites like Netflix. The participants were separated into three groups based on their TV viewing habits: less than two hours per day, greater than two hours but less than four hours, and more than four hours.
“TV time was associated with increased risk of inflammatory-related mortality. This is consistent with the hypothesis that high TV viewing may be associated with a chronic inflammatory state,” the authors wrote.
They followed up with their participants 12 years later and found, of 909 deaths, 130 were inflammatory-related. Of the inflammatory-related deaths, 21 were from diseases of the respiratory system and 18 of the nervous system, and those who watched between two to four hours of TV a day showed a 54% higher risk of inflammatory-related death. Additionally, people who watched more than four hours of TV a day doubled their risk of dying from an inflammatory disease compared to those who watched two hours.
In addition to cutting down the amount of time you spend sitting in front of the TV and sitting or lying down, you can help combat inflammation with a number of foods like avocados, berries, sweet potato, onions, and watermelon, and herbs like, cloves, ginger, rosemary, and turmeric.
This article originally appeared on Collective Evolution.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt