renegadetribune--2020-10-29--EPA Approves Radioactive Waste Product in Road Construction

By ManaSota-88 , Inc. a 501.c3 Public Health and Environmental Organization If you live next to a road , will you be living next to a hazardous waste site ?
Unfortunately , this may be a reality for many , especially in Florida .
The Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) recently announced they will approve the use of phosphogypsum in road construction .
Phosphogypsum is the radioactive waste product left over from the production of fertilizer , and Florida has a lot of phosphogypsum .
ManaSota-88 is vigorously opposed to the use of phosphogypsum in roadbeds .
High radionuclide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ groundwater contamination and lack of state regulatory oversight are some of the many reasons why phosphogypsum should not be used in road construction .
EPA and other studies have determined that the use of radioactive phosphate gypsum wastes as building materials is unsafe and should not be done .
This decision reflects the EPA ’ s past concern that the radium bearing waste , if spread throughout the country , would present a public health threat that would continue for generations , given radium ’ s 1,630-year radioactive decay half-life .
However , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Andrew Wheeler , supports the phosphate industries attempt dispose of their waste by mixing it with concrete used for road construction .
The distribution of phosphogypsum will unnecessarily expose workers , the environment , and the general public to otherwise avoidable radiation exposure .
To allow the use of phosphogypsum as a construction material is the height of irresponsibility .
Allowing phosphogypsum to be used for road construction will open the regulatory door for the use of phosphogypsum in construction or agricultural applications .
The radioactive decay of this material will emit particles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unacceptable radiation levels in areas normally not having such problems .
To date , there have been no published scientific studies confirming that there is a “ safe ” industrial process to convert phosphogypsum for uses such as roads .
EPA ’ s exemption to their own radiation rule seems to be based more on EPA ’ s failure to reduce in the generation of toxic phosphogypsum rather than reducing the public health hazard posed by this material .
All uses of phosphogypsum can cause significant health risks .
In addition to high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also contains significant amounts of sulfur and various heavy metals such as arsenic , barium , cadmium , and lead .
Contaminated water and dissolved materials containing these toxins have the potential to seep from phosphogypsum used for construction purposes and pollute the underlying aquifer .
Phosphate companies have had more than 50 years to figure out a way to dispose of the radioactive gypsum wastes in an environmentally acceptable manner but have yet to do so .
Instead , the industry is producing tens of millions of tons of waste annually , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dumping operations .
ManaSota-88 does not believe the phosphate industry should be permitted to externalize the costs of their phosphogypsum waste disposal problem at the public ’ s expense .
The cost is too high .
EPA Approves Use of Phosphogypsum in Road Construction The U.S. produces approximately 20 % of the world ’ s phosphogypsum .
In countries where reuse is practiced – such as road building , construction material , fertilizer , and landfill cover – up to 20 % of annual phosphogypsum production is diverted from stacking to other uses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s request does not mean that phosphogypsum will become widespread in roads , it allows state and local governments to investigate the opportunity to use phosphogypsum in appropriate road construction projects .
Phosphogypsum is a byproduct material of phosphate fertilizer production .
It is regulated for the presence of radium-226 , a naturally occurring radioactive substance that produces radon gas , a hazardous air pollutant .
The Clean Air Act requires the disposal of phosphogypsum in stacks , except for limited agricultural and research uses .
The Clean Air Act also provides a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for other uses , and that the Assistant Administrator may approve such a request if the alternative uses fall below risk thresholds .

By ManaSota-88, Inc. a 501.c3 Public Health and Environmental Organization
Hazardous Waste Being Mixed into Roads
If you live next to a road, will you be living next to a hazardous waste site? Unfortunately, this may be a reality for many, especially in Florida.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced they will approve the use of phosphogypsum in road construction. Phosphogypsum is the radioactive waste product left over from the production of fertilizer, and Florida has a lot of phosphogypsum.
ManaSota-88 is vigorously opposed to the use of phosphogypsum in roadbeds. High radionuclide levels, increased health risks, increased groundwater contamination and lack of state regulatory oversight are some of the many reasons why phosphogypsum should not be used in road construction.
EPA and other studies have determined that the use of radioactive phosphate gypsum wastes as building materials is unsafe and should not be done. This decision reflects the EPA’s past concern that the radium bearing waste, if spread throughout the country, would present a public health threat that would continue for generations, given radium’s 1,630-year radioactive decay half-life. However, the current administrator of the EPA, Andrew Wheeler, supports the phosphate industries attempt dispose of their waste by mixing it with concrete used for road construction.
The distribution of phosphogypsum will unnecessarily expose workers, the environment, and the general public to otherwise avoidable radiation exposure.
To allow the use of phosphogypsum as a construction material is the height of irresponsibility. Allowing phosphogypsum to be used for road construction will open the regulatory door for the use of phosphogypsum in construction or agricultural applications. The radioactive decay of this material will emit particles that can cause increased cancer risks and unacceptable radiation levels in areas normally not having such problems.
To date, there have been no published scientific studies confirming that there is a “safe” industrial process to convert phosphogypsum for uses such as roads. EPA’s exemption to their own radiation rule seems to be based more on EPA’s failure to reduce in the generation of toxic phosphogypsum rather than reducing the public health hazard posed by this material. All uses of phosphogypsum can cause significant health risks.
In addition to high radium 226 levels, central Florida phosphogypsum also contains significant amounts of sulfur and various heavy metals such as arsenic, barium, cadmium, and lead. Contaminated water and dissolved materials containing these toxins have the potential to seep from phosphogypsum used for construction purposes and pollute the underlying aquifer.
Phosphate companies have had more than 50 years to figure out a way to dispose of the radioactive gypsum wastes in an environmentally acceptable manner but have yet to do so. Instead, the industry is producing tens of millions of tons of waste annually, and the industry continues to expand its dumping operations.
ManaSota-88 does not believe the phosphate industry should be permitted to externalize the costs of their phosphogypsum waste disposal problem at the public’s expense. The cost is too high.
EPA Approves Use of Phosphogypsum in Road Construction
Additional details from My Drink Water
The U.S. produces approximately 20% of the world’s phosphogypsum. In countries where reuse is practiced – such as road building, construction material, fertilizer, and landfill cover – up to 20% of annual phosphogypsum production is diverted from stacking to other uses. While the approval of TFI’s request does not mean that phosphogypsum will become widespread in roads, it allows state and local governments to investigate the opportunity to use phosphogypsum in appropriate road construction projects. Phosphogypsum is a byproduct material of phosphate fertilizer production. It is regulated for the presence of radium-226, a naturally occurring radioactive substance that produces radon gas, a hazardous air pollutant. The Clean Air Act requires the disposal of phosphogypsum in stacks, except for limited agricultural and research uses. The Clean Air Act also provides a procedure to request authorization to use phosphogypsum for other uses, and that the Assistant Administrator may approve such a request if the alternative uses fall below risk thresholds.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-10-29--What Is the “Dark Winter” Mentioned by Biden?

According to Wikipedia , “ Operation Dark Winter was the code name for a senior-level bio-terrorist attack simulation conducted from @ @ @ @ @ It was designed to carry out a mock version of a covert and widespread smallpox @ @ @ @ @ .
”

According to Wikipedia, “Operation Dark Winter was the code name for a senior-level bio-terrorist attack simulation conducted from June 22–23, 2001. It was designed to carry out a mock version of a covert and widespread smallpox attack on the United States.”
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-10-29--Scotland’s New Hate Crimes Bill Would Criminalize Conversations at Home

Now that Great Britain is in lockdown for the foreseeable future and people are forced to stay at home more than ever before , it is incumbent upon the government to ensure that homes in Scotland are free from “ hate.
” It could soon be illegal for a Scot to try to speak to his family at the dinner table about how jews run the media , children should not be pushed into transgenderism , and importing boatloads of blacks does not actually enrich a country .
The bill adds a crime of “ stirring up hate , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meaning that stirring up hate against the indigenous Scots would still be completely “ kosher.
” This new crime involves “ behaving in a threatening or abusive manner , or communicating threatening or abusive material to another person , ” and even just possessing “ inflammatory material.
” Who defines what “ stirring up hate ” actually is ?
Would possessing certain books in one ’ s home be considered “ inflammatory material ” ?
Will enslaved Scots really walk on eggshells in their own homes to avoid the scrutiny of the thought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bill would rely on citizens turning each other over to the neo-Stasi police for criminal speech , but with the new spying technology available , including Amazon Echo and all the smart phones , people may soon be monitored by an AI that is scanning every conversation for hate speech .
Remember also that people have the right , and I speak as somebody who has been often the target and the victim of hatred , be it racial or religious , that people have the right to live their life without having @ @ @ @ @ @ @ towards them .
Criminal law must protect people from that hatred.
” Yousaf made it clear that this bill would extend to journalists , writers and theater directors , who could be dragged to court if their professional work is determined to have stirred up any “ prejudice.
” Yousaf himself is prejudiced against the indigenous Scots , having previously complained that the vast majority of senior positions in Scotland authorities were filled with White people ( in a country that is 96 % White ) .
I am sure speaking out against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was deported back to the Middle East will be a criminal offense under this new bill .

Now that Great Britain is in lockdown for the foreseeable future and people are forced to stay at home more than ever before, it is incumbent upon the government to ensure that homes in Scotland are free from “hate.” It could soon be illegal for a Scot to try to speak to his family at the dinner table about how jews run the media, children should not be pushed into transgenderism, and importing boatloads of blacks does not actually enrich a country.
The Times reports:
Conversations over the dinner table that incite hatred must be prosecuted under Scotland’s hate crime law.”
The bill adds a crime of “stirring up hate,” which only applies to protected groups, meaning that stirring up hate against the indigenous Scots would still be completely “kosher.” This new crime involves “behaving in a threatening or abusive manner, or communicating threatening or abusive material to another person,” and even just possessing “inflammatory material.”
Who defines what “stirring up hate” actually is? Would possessing certain books in one’s home be considered “inflammatory material”? Will enslaved Scots really walk on eggshells in their own homes to avoid the scrutiny of the thought police?
I assume that this new bill would rely on citizens turning each other over to the neo-Stasi police for criminal speech, but with the new spying technology available, including Amazon Echo and all the smart phones, people may soon be monitored by an AI that is scanning every conversation for hate speech.
Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf stated:
Remember also that people have the right, and I speak as somebody who has been often the target and the victim of hatred, be it racial or religious, that people have the right to live their life without having that prejudice, that hatred, directed towards them. Criminal law must protect people from that hatred.”
Yousaf made it clear that this bill would extend to journalists, writers and theater directors, who could be dragged to court if their professional work is determined to have stirred up any “prejudice.”
Yousaf himself is prejudiced against the indigenous Scots, having previously complained that the vast majority of senior positions in Scotland authorities were filled with White people (in a country that is 96% White).
I am sure speaking out against this anti-White piece of garbage and wishing he was deported back to the Middle East will be a criminal offense under this new bill.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-10-30--Cartoon Network’s New ‘Anti-Racism’ PSA

Cartoon Network’s New ‘Anti-Racism’ PSA

This video is disturbing for many reasons .
It shows a White boy and Black boy holding hands going down @ @ @ @ @ that they want to get married when older .
Then another White boy breaks their @ @ @ @ @ that they can not married , not because sodomites can not be married , but @ @ @ @ @ marry Black people .
Then some three-eyed Black superheroine comes in and saves the day @ @ @ @ @ message about how this kind of “ hatred ” is actually very common and real @ @ @ @ @ ’ t ever see it in your life .
Just think about what this is @ @ @ @ @ , at the most overt level , it is teaching them that being race-mixing fudgepackers @ @ @ @ @ Gems say BE ANTI-RACIST !
You have to acknowledge racism to act against it .
@ @ @ @ @ , use your voice and privilege to help ✊🏿✊🏼✊🏾✊✊🏻✊🏽💖

This video is disturbing for many reasons. It shows a White boy and Black boy holding hands going down a slide together, saying that they want to get married when older. Then another White boy breaks their hands apart and tells them that they cannot married, not because sodomites cannot be married, but because White people cannot marry Black people. Then some three-eyed Black superheroine comes in and saves the day. Then there is a message about how this kind of “hatred” is actually very common and real, even if you don’t ever see it in your life.
Just think about what this is teaching our children. Well, at the most overt level, it is teaching them that being race-mixing fudgepackers is awesome.
From Cartoon Network:
The Crystal Gems say BE ANTI-RACIST! You have to acknowledge racism to act against it. Don’t be silent, use your voice and privilege to help ✊🏿✊🏼✊🏾✊✊🏻✊🏽💖
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-10-30--The Importance of Samhain in the Celtic Calendar

By Charles Squire From Celtic Myth and Legend [ 1905 ] Whatever may have been the exact meaning of the Celtic state worship , there seems to be no doubt that it centred around the four great days in the year which chronicle the rise , progress , and decline of the sun , and , therefore , of the fruits of the earth .
These were : Beltaine , which fell at the beginning of May ; Midsummer Day , marking the triumph of sunshine and vegetation ; the Feast of Lugh , when , in August , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been reached ; and the sad Samhain , when he bade farewell to power , and fell again for half a year under the sway of the evil forces of winter and darkness .
Of these great solar periods , the first and the last were , naturally , the most important .
The whole Celtic mythology seems to revolve upon them , as upon pivots .
It was on the day of Beltaine that Partholon and his people , the discoverers , and , indeed , the makers of Ireland , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and it was on the same day , three hundred years later , that they returned whence they came .
It was on Beltaine-day that the Gaelic gods , the Tuatha Dé Danann , and , after them , the Gaelic men , first set foot on Irish soil .
It was on the day of Samhain that the Fomors oppressed the people of Nemed with their terrible tax ; and it was again at Samhain that a later race of gods of light and life finally conquered those demons at the Battle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incident–and that was one added at a later time !
–happened upon any other than one of those two days ; it was upon Midsummer Day , one of the lesser solar points , that the people of the goddess Danu took Ireland from its inhabitants , the Fir Bolgs .
The mythology of Britain preserves the same root-idea as that of Ireland .
If anything uncanny took place , it was sure to be on May-day .
It was on “ the night of the first of May ” that Rhiannon lost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the infant Pryderi , as told in the first of the Mabinogion .
It was “ on every May-eve ” that the two dragons fought and shrieked in the reign of “ King ” Lludd .
It is on “ every first of May ” till the day of doom that Gwyn son of Nudd , fights with Gwyrthur son of Greidawl , for Lludd ’ s fair daughter , Creudylad .
And it was when she was “ a-maying ” in the woods and fields near Westminster that the same Gwyn , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sir Meliagraunce , captured Arthur ’ s queen , Guinevere .
The nature of the rites performed upon these days can be surmised from their pale survivals .
They are still celebrated by the descendants of the Celts , though it is probable that few of them know–or would even care to know–why May Day , St. John ’ s Day , Lammas , and Hallowe ’ en are times of ceremony .
The first–called “ Beltaine ” in Ireland , “ Bealtiunn ” in Scotland , “ Shenn da Boaldyn ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Galan-Mai ” ( the Calends of May ) in Wales–celebrates the waking of the earth from her winter sleep , and the renewal of warmth , life , and vegetation .
This is the meaning of the May-pole , now rarely seen in our streets , though Shakespeare tells us that in his time the festival was so eagerly anticipated that no one could sleep upon its eve .
At midnight the people rose , and , going to the nearest woods , tore down branches of trees , with which the sun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doors and windows decked for him .
They spent the day in dancing round the May-pole , with rude , rustic mirth , man joining with nature to celebrate the coming of summer .
The opposite to it was the day called “ Samhain ” in Ireland and Scotland , “ Sauin ” in Man , and “ Nos Galan-gaeof ” ( the Night of the Winter Calends ) in Wales .
This festival was a sad one : summer was over , and winter , with its short , sunless days and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand .
It was the beginning , too , of the ancient Celtic year , and omens for the future might be extorted from dark powers by uncanny rites .
It was the holiday of the dead and of all the more evil supernatural beings .
“ On November-eve ” , says a North Cardiganshire proverb , “ there is a bogy on every stile.
” The Scotch have even invented a special bogy–the Samhanach or goblin which comes out at Samhain .
The sun-god himself is said to have instituted the August @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s commemoration ) in Ireland , “ Lla Lluanys ” in Man , and “ Gwyl Awst ” ( August Feast ) in Wales ; and it was once of hardly less importance than Beltaine or Samhain .
It is noteworthy , too , that the first of August was a great day at Lyons–formerly called Lugudunum , the dún ( town ) of Lugus .
The mid-summer festival , on the other hand , has largely merged its mythological significance in the Christian Feast of St. John .
The characteristic features @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the original nature of the great pagan ceremonials of which they are the survivals and travesties .
In all of them , bonfires are lighted on the highest hills , and the hearth fires solemnly rekindled .
They form the excuse for much sport and jollity .
But there is yet something sinister in the air ; the “ fairies ” are active and abroad , and one must be careful to omit no prescribed rite , if one would avoid kindling their anger or falling into their power .
To some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a comparatively late period .
When Pennant wrote , in the eighteenth century , it was the custom on Beltaine-day in many Highland villages to offer libations and cakes not only to the “ spirits ” who were believed to be beneficial to the flocks and herds , but also to creatures like the fox , the eagle , and the hoodie-crow which so often molested them .
At Hallowe ’ en ( the Celtic Samhain ) the natives of the Hebrides used to pour libations of ale to a marine god @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sea-weed to the shore .
In honour , also , of such beings , curious rites were performed .
Maidens washed their faces in morning dew , with prayers for beauty .
They carried sprigs of the rowan , that mystic tree whose scarlet berries were the ambrosial food of the Tuatha Dé Danann .

By Charles Squire
From Celtic Myth and Legend [1905]
Whatever may have been the exact meaning of the Celtic state worship, there seems to be no doubt that it centred around the four great days in the year which chronicle the rise, progress, and decline of the sun, and, therefore, of the fruits of the earth. These were: Beltaine, which fell at the beginning of May; Midsummer Day, marking the triumph of sunshine and vegetation; the Feast of Lugh, when, in August, the turning-point of the sun’s course had been reached; and the sad Samhain, when he bade farewell to power, and fell again for half a year under the sway of the evil forces of winter and darkness.
Of these great solar periods, the first and the last were, naturally, the most important. The whole Celtic mythology seems to revolve upon them, as upon pivots. It was on the day of Beltaine that Partholon and his people, the discoverers, and, indeed, the makers of Ireland, arrived there from the other world, and it was on the same day, three hundred years later, that they returned whence they came. It was on Beltaine-day that the Gaelic gods, the Tuatha Dé Danann, and, after them, the Gaelic men, first set foot on Irish soil. It was on the day of Samhain that the Fomors oppressed the people of Nemed with their terrible tax; and it was again at Samhain that a later race of gods of light and life finally conquered those demons at the Battle of Moytura. Only one important mythological incident–and that was one added at a later time!–happened upon any other than one of those two days; it was upon Midsummer Day, one of the lesser solar points, that the people of the goddess Danu took Ireland from its inhabitants, the Fir Bolgs.
The mythology of Britain preserves the same root-idea as that of Ireland. If anything uncanny took place, it was sure to be on May-day. It was on “the night of the first of May” that Rhiannon lost, and Teirnyon Twryf Vliant found, the infant Pryderi, as told in the first of the Mabinogion. It was “on every May-eve” that the two dragons fought and shrieked in the reign of “King” Lludd. It is on “every first of May” till the day of doom that Gwyn son of Nudd, fights with Gwyrthur son of Greidawl, for Lludd’s fair daughter, Creudylad. And it was when she was “a-maying” in the woods and fields near Westminster that the same Gwyn, or Melwas, under his romance-name of Sir Meliagraunce, captured Arthur’s queen, Guinevere.
The nature of the rites performed upon these days can be surmised from their pale survivals. They are still celebrated by the descendants of the Celts, though it is probable that few of them know–or would even care to know–why May Day, St. John’s Day, Lammas, and Hallowe’en are times of ceremony. The first–called “Beltaine” in Ireland, “Bealtiunn” in Scotland, “Shenn da Boaldyn” in the Isle of Man, and “Galan-Mai” (the Calends of May) in Wales–celebrates the waking of the earth from her winter sleep, and the renewal of warmth, life, and vegetation. This is the meaning of the May-pole, now rarely seen in our streets, though Shakespeare tells us that in his time the festival was so eagerly anticipated that no one could sleep upon its eve. At midnight the people rose, and, going to the nearest woods, tore down branches of trees, with which the sun, when he rose, would find doors and windows decked for him. They spent the day in dancing round the May-pole, with rude, rustic mirth, man joining with nature to celebrate the coming of summer. The opposite to it was the day called “Samhain” in Ireland and Scotland, “Sauin” in Man, and “Nos Galan-gaeof” (the Night of the Winter Calends) in Wales. This festival was a sad one: summer was over, and winter, with its short, sunless days and long, dreary nights, was at hand. It was the beginning, too, of the ancient Celtic year, and omens for the future might be extorted from dark powers by uncanny rites. It was the holiday of the dead and of all the more evil supernatural beings. “On November-eve”, says a North Cardiganshire proverb, “there is a bogy on every stile.” The Scotch have even invented a special bogy–the Samhanach or goblin which comes out at Samhain.
The sun-god himself is said to have instituted the August festival called “Lugnassad” (Lugh’s commemoration) in Ireland, “Lla Lluanys” in Man, and “Gwyl Awst” (August Feast) in Wales; and it was once of hardly less importance than Beltaine or Samhain. It is noteworthy, too, that the first of August was a great day at Lyons–formerly called Lugudunum, the dún (town) of Lugus. The mid-summer festival, on the other hand, has largely merged its mythological significance in the Christian Feast of St. John.
The characteristic features of these festivals give certain proof of the original nature of the great pagan ceremonials of which they are the survivals and travesties. In all of them, bonfires are lighted on the highest hills, and the hearth fires solemnly rekindled. They form the excuse for much sport and jollity. But there is yet something sinister in the air; the “fairies” are active and abroad, and one must be careful to omit no prescribed rite, if one would avoid kindling their anger or falling into their power. To some of these still-half-believed-in nature-gods offerings were made down to a comparatively late period. When Pennant wrote, in the eighteenth century, it was the custom on Beltaine-day in many Highland villages to offer libations and cakes not only to the “spirits” who were believed to be beneficial to the flocks and herds, but also to creatures like the fox, the eagle, and the hoodie-crow which so often molested them. At Hallowe’en (the Celtic Samhain) the natives of the Hebrides used to pour libations of ale to a marine god called Shony, imploring him to send sea-weed to the shore. In honour, also, of such beings, curious rites were performed. Maidens washed their faces in morning dew, with prayers for beauty. They carried sprigs of the rowan, that mystic tree whose scarlet berries were the ambrosial food of the Tuatha Dé Danann.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-10-30--The Hyper-realistic Scandinavian Art of Carl Sundt-Hansen

As I read Sundt-Hansen ’ s biography I keep on wondering how an artist of such magnitude had to go through the financial troubles that he endured in his career to the point of him seemingly dying totally bankrupt and with cancer at the age of 66 , after having spent his final days in some neck of the woods in Norway living in a small cabin ( albeit in an idyllic place ) .
I gather that this man should be nowadays an icon in his native Norway regardless .
Whatever the case might be Carl Sundt-Hansen was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outstanding hyper-realistic precision , a feature with still provokes admiration to this day .
Here is his biography which I had put together thanks to information sources written in English but also in Norwegian ( Bokmål I presume ) .
Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen ( 30 January 1841 , Stavanger – 27 August 1907 , Stavanger ) was a Norwegian-Danish genre painter in the Romantic Nationalist style .
He adopted his mother ’ s maiden-name ( Sundt ) in 1878 .
As the eldest son an old family of wealthy merchants , young Carl @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business , but finally decided to turn it over to his younger 16-year-old brother Hans in order to join the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts in Copenhagen which by that time was directed by Frederik Ferdinand Helsted .
Sundt-Hansen ’ s father was interested in the arts as well and , at some point , he had helped young Carl establish a local theater in his hometown , so Hansen encountered little opposition from his family when he decided to move to the art academy in 1859 .
However Sundt-Hansen did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he shared lodging with one of his professors , but after some time he chafed under the strict oversight .
In spite of these issues Sundt-Hansen discovered his interest in folk life painting while living in Copenhagen .
About two years later Sundt-Hansen decided to travel to Düsseldorf to join the Kunstakademie there .
Although his fellow-countrymen , Adolph Tidemand and Hans Gude were teaching at the Kunstakademie Sundt-Hansen chose to study with Swiss folk painter Benjamin Vautier who nourished Hansen ’ s interest in folk life tradition even further .
Thus Carl @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needed , a direction he maintained for the most part of his artistic life .
In 1864 , he sent his first painting home , where it was shown at an exhibit by the Oslo Kunstforening and was well received .
In 1866 Carl Sundt-Hansen moved to Paris as he became very interested in Ernest Meissonier and Paul Delaroche ‘ s extremely precise and detailed historical genre paintings .
Hansen decided to perfect his own technique in the same direction , at the same time , he concentrated more on the psychological aspects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the demands of French Realism for truthfulness and honesty in the rendering of motifs .
The effort was really worth it ; when King Charles visited the Exposition Universelle in 1867 , he was so impressed by Hansen ’ s work that he awarded him the Order of Vasa .
In 1869 he moved to Oslo where he wanted to settle permanently .
His intention was to establish a studio in the city but the environment felt too narrow as the art market there was somewhat unpromising .
Hansen eventually decided to relocate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remained until 1882 .
Rumour has it that , at his arrival to the Swedish capital , Hansen was employed by the art-enthusiast King Carl XV , but the King unfortunately died the following year .
In 1882 an economic crisis precipitated by the Paris Bourse Crash forced Hansen ’ s family business in Stavanger to go bankrupt , as a consequence he was no longer financially independent .
In an attempt to improve his situation he moved from Stavanger , where he had frequented the highest social strata , and settled outside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place for many Norwegian and Danish artists .
However the income from his paintings was insufficient and , as he was a slow worker , he produced very little output .
By that time his brother Wilhelm was ruined and his wife , the artist Frida Hansen , had to be the family ’ s support .
Because of Hansen ’ s financial situation now became dependent on selling his works , he painted a number of motifs from the more idyllic and humorous aspects of folk life , such as Peasant Girl @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ s painting collection ) .
However , he did not let go of more serious themes , and in 1890 he painted A Funeral on Board ( National Gallery ) , the picture he himself kept for his main work .
It won the 2nd gold medal in Munich in 1891 and poet Holger Drachmann wrote a poem about it .
In 1889 , he became a Danish citizen and was admitted to the Royal Academy as a full member .
He lived in Copenhagen until 1896 but poor finances forced him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It was during that year when he settled in Valle in Setesdal ( Norway ) where he was surrounded by his beloved motives while living in a small cabin there .
In 1907 , he became ill with what was diagnosed as nicotine poisoning .
Nothing worked to improve his health , so he went to a hospital in Stavanger , where it was discovered that he had cancer .
For the last few months of his life , he lived in Stavanger with his brother , Hans .
No more details about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about his final resting place are given .

As I read Sundt-Hansen’s biography I keep on wondering how an artist of such magnitude had to go through the financial troubles that he endured in his career to the point of him seemingly dying totally bankrupt and with cancer at the age of 66, after having spent his final days in some neck of the woods in Norway living in a small cabin (albeit in an idyllic place). I gather that this man should be nowadays an icon in his native Norway regardless.
Whatever the case might be Carl Sundt-Hansen was a gifted artist who painted his works with outstanding hyper-realistic precision, a feature with still provokes admiration to this day. Here is his biography which I had put together thanks to information sources written in English but also in Norwegian (Bokmål I presume).
Biography
Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen (30 January 1841, Stavanger – 27 August 1907, Stavanger) was a Norwegian-Danish genre painter in the Romantic Nationalist style. He adopted his mother’s maiden-name (Sundt) in 1878.
As the eldest son an old family of wealthy merchants, young Carl was determined to take over the family business, but finally decided to turn it over to his younger 16-year-old brother Hans in order to join the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts in Copenhagen which by that time was directed by Frederik Ferdinand Helsted. Sundt-Hansen’s father was interested in the arts as well and, at some point, he had helped young Carl establish a local theater in his hometown, so Hansen encountered little opposition from his family when he decided to move to the art academy in 1859. However Sundt-Hansen did not like it there. At some point he shared lodging with one of his professors, but after some time he chafed under the strict oversight. In spite of these issues Sundt-Hansen discovered his interest in folk life painting while living in Copenhagen.
About two years later Sundt-Hansen decided to travel to Düsseldorf to join the Kunstakademie there. Although his fellow-countrymen, Adolph Tidemand and Hans Gude were teaching at the Kunstakademie Sundt-Hansen chose to study with Swiss folk painter Benjamin Vautier who nourished Hansen’s interest in folk life tradition even further. Thus Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen found the artistic direction he needed, a direction he maintained for the most part of his artistic life. In 1864, he sent his first painting home, where it was shown at an exhibit by the Oslo Kunstforening and was well received.
Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen portrayed Norwegian peasant life as truthfully and faithfully as possible in the most accurate and detailed way. His choice was predominantly figurative motifs with peasants and farm girls, both indoors and outdoors, often with only a single person pictured in solitary contemplation. – Translated from Norsk Kunstnerleksikon, I-IV, published 1982-86.
In 1866 Carl Sundt-Hansen moved to Paris as he became very interested in Ernest Meissonier and Paul Delaroche‘s extremely precise and detailed historical genre paintings. Hansen decided to perfect his own technique in the same direction, at the same time, he concentrated more on the psychological aspects of his portrayal of people influenced by the demands of French Realism for truthfulness and honesty in the rendering of motifs. The effort was really worth it; when King Charles visited the Exposition Universelle in 1867, he was so impressed by Hansen’s work that he awarded him the Order of Vasa.
In 1869 he moved to Oslo where he wanted to settle permanently. His intention was to establish a studio in the city but the environment felt too narrow as the art market there was somewhat unpromising. Hansen eventually decided to relocate to Stockholm in 1871, where he remained until 1882. Rumour has it that, at his arrival to the Swedish capital, Hansen was employed by the art-enthusiast King Carl XV, but the King unfortunately died the following year.
It was precisely in Stockholm where Hansen created some of his finest works. He concentrated on motifs that depicted people in emotionally charged situations and in scenes where man is confronted powerlessly with fate. Intimate and low-key, but at the same time psychologically profound. Anxiety and guilt, remorse and atonement, grief and death are depicted, with an almost photographic realism. – Translated from Norsk Kunstnerleksikon, I-IV, published 1982-86.
In 1882 an economic crisis precipitated by the Paris Bourse Crash forced Hansen’s family business in Stavanger to go bankrupt, as a consequence he was no longer financially independent. In an attempt to improve his situation he moved from Stavanger, where he had frequented the highest social strata, and settled outside Copenhagen where his home became a gathering place for many Norwegian and Danish artists. However the income from his paintings was insufficient and, as he was a slow worker, he produced very little output. By that time his brother Wilhelm was ruined and his wife, the artist Frida Hansen, had to be the family’s support.
Because of Hansen’s financial situation now became dependent on selling his works, he painted a number of motifs from the more idyllic and humorous aspects of folk life, such as Peasant Girl Playing Accordion (1884, Lillehammer City‘s painting collection). However, he did not let go of more serious themes, and in 1890 he painted A Funeral on Board (National Gallery), the picture he himself kept for his main work. It won the 2nd gold medal in Munich in 1891 and poet Holger Drachmann wrote a poem about it.
Sundt-Hansen’s technique meant he spent a very long time on each picture. To reduce the cost of models, he began in Copenhagen to photograph the main subjects and then paint directly after the photographs. There are many indications that he may also have developed a technique of transferring the photograph directly to the canvas, but the procedure is not known. – Translated from Norsk Kunstnerleksikon, I-IV, published 1982-86.
In 1889, he became a Danish citizen and was admitted to the Royal Academy as a full member. He lived in Copenhagen until 1896 but poor finances forced him to reduce his cost of living. It was during that year when he settled in Valle in Setesdal (Norway) where he was surrounded by his beloved motives while living in a small cabin there.
In 1907, he became ill with what was diagnosed as nicotine poisoning. Nothing worked to improve his health, so he went to a hospital in Stavanger, where it was discovered that he had cancer. For the last few months of his life, he lived in Stavanger with his brother, Hans. No more details about Hansen’s last days or even about his final resting place are given.
Sources: Le Prince Lointain, wikipedia and Norwegian Artist Lexicon.
BUY ME A COFFEE
'Såret' (1888) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Bondejente Spiller Trekkspill' (1884) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen Superb painting: 'Young Woman with Traditional Costume' (1887) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'I Lensmannsarresten' (Communion In Jail) (1875) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Etter Slagsmålet' (After The Fight) (1882) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Confrontation' by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'A Hardened Man' (1896) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'The Captain's Wife' (1895) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Portrait of a Man' (1902) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Self Portrait' by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Young Girl Praying' by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Young Woman Reading' (1880) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Landsbydoktoren' (1887) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Grace' (1900) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Saturday Proposal In Setesdal' (1880) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Liten Gutt' (1888) (Stavanger Kunstmuseum) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Old Farmer' (1862-64) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Sovende Jeger' (1889 - Nasjonalmuseet, Samlingen) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'En Begravelse Ombord' (Burial at Sea) (1890) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Setesdal Girl On Ski' by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'The Flagellation' (1896) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Young Boy' (1904) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Interiør fra Kvinnherrad' (1863) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen No bigger size. Shame: 'Pike Ved Vevstolen' by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'Setesdøl Med Pipe' (1990) by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen 'The Card Artist' by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen Popping out the picture frame: 'Setesdal Boy' by Carl Fredrik Sundt-Hansen
Share now!
Author: J. Belenger J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. Twitter Facebook


renegadetribune--2020-10-30--No Fun Allowed This Halloween by Order of the Flu World Order

Children love Halloween .
It is the one day they get to dress up and pretend to be something scary , ridiculous , or cute .
Of course they love getting the candy , which these days is not healthy for them at all , but I will overlook that at this point .
I personally have fond memories of meeting up with my friends on a chilly fall afternoon and getting ready to visit all the houses in the neighborhood before returning home to review my stash and watch some spooky Halloween movies .
Although the modern holiday , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is bereft of almost all its former meaning , it is still an essential part of growing up in America .
If nothing else , it is simply fun .
However , fun is not allowed in the Flu World Order , by order of our kosher controllers .
We need to be scared , depressed , socially distanced , and masked with PPE , not costume masks .
We have been warned for a month that Halloween this year needs to be seriously restricted .
Here is a Nashville news story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , offering “ alternatives ” for people to celebrate Halloween .
If you absolutely must trick or treat , you better put on those masks and carry a bottle of hand sanitizer !
Just consider what actually happens with trick-or-treating .
Children , who are essentially immune to the fake COVID-19 pandemic ( officially ) , get together and walk around outdoors , briefly visiting doorways , where adults hand out candy bars from a considerable distance .
Even if this fake pandemic was real , how would trick or treating be dangerous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ travel on candy bar wrappers ?
It sure is magical how these “ germs ” do not seem to exist when buying things at a Walmart or ordering them from Amazon , right ?
They are trying to condition us to believe that anything social and fun is now deadly , and so we need change our entire way of living and cultural customs to fit within the new normal of the flu world order .
I say to hell with them .
Let children have fun this Halloween .

Children love Halloween. It is the one day they get to dress up and pretend to be something scary, ridiculous, or cute. Of course they love getting the candy, which these days is not healthy for them at all, but I will overlook that at this point. I personally have fond memories of meeting up with my friends on a chilly fall afternoon and getting ready to visit all the houses in the neighborhood before returning home to review my stash and watch some spooky Halloween movies. Although the modern holiday, which was very important to the Celts, is bereft of almost all its former meaning, it is still an essential part of growing up in America. If nothing else, it is simply fun.
However, fun is not allowed in the Flu World Order, by order of our kosher controllers. We need to be scared, depressed, socially distanced, and masked with PPE, not costume masks. We have been warned for a month that Halloween this year needs to be seriously restricted.
CDC guidelines are discouraging trick or treating.
Here is a Nashville news story pushing real fear onto parents and children, offering “alternatives” for people to celebrate Halloween.
If you absolutely must trick or treat, you better put on those masks and carry a bottle of hand sanitizer!
Just consider what actually happens with trick-or-treating. Children, who are essentially immune to the fake COVID-19 pandemic (officially), get together and walk around outdoors, briefly visiting doorways, where adults hand out candy bars from a considerable distance. Even if this fake pandemic was real, how would trick or treating be dangerous at all? Because “germs” travel on candy bar wrappers? It sure is magical how these “germs” do not seem to exist when buying things at a Walmart or ordering them from Amazon, right?
They are trying to condition us to believe that anything social and fun is now deadly, and so we need change our entire way of living and cultural customs to fit within the new normal of the flu world order. I say to hell with them.
Let children have fun this Halloween.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-10-31--Good Goy Schwarze Says Blacks Must Fight ‘Anti-Semitism’ in the White Nationalist Movement

Eric Ward , Executive Director of Western States Center , kvetches about how anti-Semitic the White nationalist movement is and @ @ @ @ @ something about it .

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-10-31--Reexamining the “Gas Chamber” of Dachau

Reexamining the “Gas Chamber” of Dachau

Of the Dachau crematorium called “ Barrack X , ” one can read the following on the Web site of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum : “ There is no credible evidence that the gas chamber in Barrack X was used to murder human beings.
” [ 1 ] A strange situation indeed , given that the facility , built in late 1942 and completed by May 1943 , [ 2 ] allegedly contained a dedicated homicidal gas chamber of substantial size—about 39 square meters ( 425 square feet ) , sufficient to gas nearly 400 people at a time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would the Germans build such a dedicated facility , and then never use it ?
—not a single mass gassing , in nearly two years ?
[ 3 ] Is there perhaps another story here ?
And what can we learn from examining the facility today ?
The following study is the result of my personal visit to Dachau over a period of three days in mid-2011 .
All photos included below are my own .
Photo 1 shows the exterior of the crematorium building , with the external wall of the gas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ water downspout ) .
Photo 2 is the current floor plan .
In the immediate aftermath of the war , no doubt was expressed or entertained that the crematorium contained a homicidal chamber .
An official US Army report , issued within days of takeover of the camp , was unequivocal .
In Dachau the Germans conducted a “ systematic policy of extermination ” ( Perry 2000 : 14-15 ) —though today we know that no such thing ever occurred or was even planned .
There were “ a total of five gas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the largest disguised as a shower .
In it , 15 fake shower heads were installed , “ from which gas was then released ” ( p. 52 ) .
The Nuremberg Tribunal proceedings contain two important references , the first in the so-called Chavez Report , dated 7 May 1945 : Now , the showerheads no longer supply the deadly gas , but it emanates from the floor .
There is indeed a cellar room below the gas chamber , but we have no evidence at all that it was a ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such gas entered the room from below .
Today there are six floor vents in the room , and by all accounts they are , and have always been , actual water drains ( photo 3 ) .
This is logical , because the room was likely built from the start as an ordinary inmate shower facility .
Here we see an immediate contradiction with the first two reports : no gas from showerheads , no gassing through floor vents , but rather rows of overhead perforated pipes .
Also , the alleged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chamber ( room # 8 in Photo 2 ) is absurd ; there is no conceivable reason to run Zyklon gas , which is flammable , into a furnace room .
And the reported floor area of roughly 600 square feet—versus today ’ s figure of 425—is a significant overestimate .
Further confusion would come soon after the Chavez report , when , in an American investigation report of May 15 , it was stated that “ The supply of gas into the chamber was controlled by means of two valves on one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ let into the chamber through pipes terminating in perforated brass fixtures set into the ceiling.
” [ 4 ] No gas from the floor , no rows of perforated pipes , but now “ perforated brass fixtures.
” Today , incidentally , there is no evidence whatsoever of brass fixtures .
Significantly , the May 15 report also stated that “ the ceiling was some 10 feet in height.
” Today it is about 2.15 meters , or 6 feet 10 inches .
This is a huge discrepancy , and not attributable to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , after takeover by the Americans .
The second Nuremberg reference came in testimony by Dr. Franz Blaha , a Czech prisoner and four-year inmate .
He stated : A puzzle : Blaha claims the chamber was completed only in 1944 , but experts today insist that it was part of the original construction that began in 1942 .
The NYT reported on Blaha ’ s testimony in November 1945 , dramatically stating that he was “ assigned to work in the death chamber of the hospital ” —meaning , of course , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the creation of shrunken heads , and of skin made into “ gloves , lampshades , riding breeches , house-slippers , handbags ” and other items ( all such claims have since been completely discredited , putting Blaha ’ s credibility into serious doubt ) .
He also recalled “ the wholesale execution of Russian prisoners in a gas chamber… He declared that a quick death in the gas chamber had been meted out to the sick prisoners transferred to Dachau from other camps ” ( Nov. 17 , p. 7 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the alleged gassing atrocities .
For example , it reported statements by one Colonel Jaworski that “ jews had been ‘ ruthlessly wiped out ’ by hanging and firing squad and gas chambers at Dachau .
Frequently they were paraded into a gas chamber , told to strip for shower and then left to die when the gas was turned on ” ( 21 October , p. 11 ) —as if the gas chamber were like some household oven .
As one can imagine , questions eventually arose regarding the veracity of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] The first challenges appeared in 1950 , with Paul Rassinier ’ s book Le mensonge d ’ Ulysse , and Maurice Bardèche ’ s Nuremberg , both in French .
In 1954 , the German Ludwig Paulin published an article , “ The lie of the 238,000 : What happened in camp Dachau ?
, ” in which he disputed the existence of a gas chamber .
[ 6 ] Two months later , another article appeared in the same journal , pseudonymously written by American military attorney Stephen Pinter .
Pinter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ camps , including Dachau , without finding any credible evidence for homicidal gas chambers .
[ 7 ] In 1958 , Louis Marschalko published the book The World Conquerors .
He argues that , upon takeover by the Americans , captive Germans “ were ordered subsequently to build various additional buildings with the greatest possible speed ” ( p. 155 ) .
They constructed “ blood-pits ” and a “ hanging tree , ” and destroyed gardens and flowerbeds that might detract from the ‘ death camp ’ image .
Marschalko adds , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and reception halls had to be rebuilt so that they should appear like gas-chambers ” ( p. 156 ) .
In June of 1959 , Pinter spoke out again , publishing the follow statement in a letter to a Catholic periodical : Former inmate and Catholic bishop Johannes Neuhäusler claimed , in 1960 , that no gas chamber had ever been put into use at the camp .
[ 8 ] Two months later , orthodox German historian Martin Broszat issued a letter confirming that “ Neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gassed.
” [ 9 ] Admission of no gassing at the camp was an important milestone , but the much more serious charge of deliberate deception continued to appear .
In 1961 , the journal of the British National Party , Combat , published an article titled “ Jewish Deceit at Dachau ” : Indeed , the gas chamber ceiling today is 2.15 meters high , but the adjacent room height is 2.9 meters—a full 75 cm ( 30 inch ) differential .
Whoever lowered the ceiling and installed the ‘ fake showerheads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Today it appears as a poured concrete ceiling , smooth and white , into which someone roughly chiseled several funnel-shaped holes .
Of the 15 such holes , 13 have an open metal funnel , one is complete with perforated head , and the last is fully exposed—see Photos 4 , 5 , 6 .
In most cases one can see , faintly , evidence of rework to the ceiling after the ‘ shower heads ’ were installed—see Photo 7 .
By the 1960s , talk of mass killings in a “ Dachau @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hilberg ’ s magnum opus , Destruction of the European Jews , contains virtually no mention of such a gas chamber—either in his first ( 1961 ) edition or in his massive , 3-volume 2003 edition .
Paul Berben ’ s Dachau 1933-1945 : The Official History states flatly that “ the Dachau gas-chamber was never operated ” ( 1975 : 8 ) .
[ 10 ] Laqueur ( 2001 : 240 ) briefly discusses the Blaha testimony and his claim that “ several executions were carried out in the Dachau gas chamber.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ mantle of secrecy ” that surrounded Barrack X ( the crematorium ) and the fact that we have “ only one unequivocal testimony ” —that of Blaha—that therefore “ it is difficult to corroborate Blaha ’ s statements and say with certainty whether the Dachau gas chamber was ever used for its designed purpose.
” The most definitive recent study is Harold Marcuse ’ s Legacies of Dachau ( 2001 ) .
This 590-page book contains numerous details on the camp construction and history , and yet has scarcely a mention @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims , without evidence , that “ only trial gassings ” were conducted at the camp .
[ 11 ] He cites a 1960 exhibit in the crematorium that included a sign with a striking admission : “ This room would have been used as an undressing and waiting room if the gas chamber had worked ” ( p. 254 ) .
Marcuse dismisses this claim , stating , again without evidence , that it was in fact used “ on at least two groups of prisoners.
” He quickly adds that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gassings… ” Other recent works seem to completely overlook Dachau , as if it played no role whatsoever in the Holocaust .
Longerich ’ s authoritative Holocaust : The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews ( 2010 ) , for example , has only passing mention of the camp on three or four scattered pages ( out of 645 total ) , and no reference to a gas chamber there at all .
Even as late as 2003 , there was an official sign there stating : “ GAS CHAMBER : disguised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used as a gas chamber.
” Today there is one wall sign that says , “ This was the center of potential ( ! )
mass murder.
” Another sign states that the chamber “ was not used for mass murder .
Survivors have testified that the SS did , however , murder individual prisoners and small groups here using poison gas.
” [ 12 ] Evidently the story of a ‘ homicidal gas chamber ’ must be maintained at all costs .
There are other reasons to be suspicious , and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the official history .
Let ’ s return to the room itself .
Photo 8 shows the interior entrance door and the infamous “ Brausebad ” ( ‘ shower ’ ) sign , looking on through to the exterior exit door .
Both entrance and exit have similar , heavy , vault-like metal doors .
The entrance door is wedged in place against the floor and can not move , but the exit door swings freely .
The problem is that it does not close .
The following two photos ( 9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hits on the locking pin ; it can not close and can not seal ‘ gas tight ’ .
In fact the door is roughly half an inch too wide for the pin .
This is no minor adjustment .
The doorway was significantly altered since its original construction .
But we do not know when , or for what purpose .
It may have been as part of covert American alterations immediately after the war , or it could have simply reflected the general conversion of the camp to a ‘ memorial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1960s—it clearly would not do to have tourists locking each other in the room .
( But of course , with one door wedged open , this could not happen…another strange fact . )
During my visit I came prepared to do a unique bit of analysis : I brought along a hand-held wall metal detector .
[ 13 ] I can not claim any astounding new discoveries , but I did a fairly careful scan of all four interior walls and the ceiling .
The walls had virtually no metal at all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of three inches .
The ceiling , by contrast , showed extensive metal content , almost throughout the entire extent .
There was no evident pattern , just a more or less continuous positive reading .
This would suggest some kind of heavy wire mesh , perhaps associated with the poured concrete .
[ 14 ] It was not possible to detect the presence or absence of individual pipes in the ceiling .
Another feature of interest is the pair of “ Zyklon gassing ports.
” In the ( one ) exterior wall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 40 cm ) openings , with a heavy metal grating on the interior—see Photos 11 and 12 .
Allegedly , the Zyklon pellets were dumped into a chute on the exterior of the building ( Photo 13 ) and then either were trapped by the grill , or spilled through onto the floor .
The grill was there to prevent the victims from interfering with this process .
There are several problems with this set-up .
First , the chutes are welded open , so that no one can verify the closure , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the process is very crude—hardly better than just tossing an open Zyklon can into the room as the door is being slammed shut .
Third , the first few dead bodies could have easily blocked the grates , putting a quick end to the gassing process .
Then there is the problem of cleanup : How were the operators supposed to collect up those deadly Zyklon pellets , which would continue to emit gas for two hours or more , long after the victims were dead ?
To this we have no answer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inefficient scheme at best ; the poison gas would only slowly and unevenly diffuse into the room .
Better to employ some kind of heated , forced-air system that would quickly circulate the deadly gas .
And in fact , the Germans had precisely such a system—and only three rooms away .
Room # 1 ( see Photo 2 ) contains four actual Zyklon disinfesting chambers , with sophisticated dispensing systems .
Photo 14 shows the exterior of these chambers , and Photo 15 the machine for opening and retaining the pellets , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These rooms were very effective at delousing linens , clothing , and personal items , and thus preventing the spread of the deadly typhus disease .
[ 15 ] Evidently the Germans wanted to spare lives in the camp , not end them .
And one further oddity : The Zyklon chutes show clear signs of being installed after the original building construction .
In close-up views of the chutes , we can see that the concrete mortar is clearly different than that used for the remainder of the wall—finer quality , more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ See Photos 16 ( left chute ) , 17 ( right chute ) , and the detail in Photo 18 .
There would not be such a discrepancy in the construction material if the gas chamber and chutes were installed at the time of construction , as the experts insist to this day .
Evidently someone broke into the completed brick wall at a later date to install the chutes—perhaps at the direction of the occupying Americans .
While they were at it , someone , at some later date , significantly altered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Photo 19 , from the summer of 1944 , with Photo 1 , which I explicitly took from the same perspective .
The new chimney is significantly shorter , and thus , at the very least , someone removed the top 10 or 20 feet .
They also added some sort of white banding strips at two points .
There is no obvious explanation for this reconstruction .
Well-built brick chimneys survive for literally hundreds of years .
More riddles .
Finally there is a huge question mark around the piping and ductwork @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Various drawings and studies over the years indicate numerous changes , alterations , additions , and reconstructions—to the point where the present system is nonsensical .
A properly-designed chamber would be clear and simple : a single air duct connected at opposite ends of the room ( to recirculate the poison gas ) , an in-line air heater ( to improve gasification ) , a remote ( attic or backroom ) Zyklon introduction device , and a simple pair of inlet/outlet chimneys for cleansing the chamber of the deadly gas .
Instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an absurd , jury-rigged system of pipes , valves , and condensers , one that bears all the marks of a series of postwar constructions .
In all likelihood the room was designed and built as an actual shower , which was then reconstructed , with the lower ceiling , to meet American expectations of what a ‘ gas chamber ’ should look like .
One can imagine what visitors learn of all this when they see the camp today .
Entrance is free and there are no official guides , so various @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expert ’ guides .
However , when it comes to the crematorium ( Barrack X ) , there seems to be a set routine .
The group gathers outside the building as the guide briefly explains the ‘ assembly-line process ’ of undressing , gassing , cremating , etc .
He then sends them in at one end , and they pass through the several rooms of the building ( see again the floor plan in Photo 2 ) , emerging from the furnace room , where the guide is dutifully waiting .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ better to avoid any pointed and difficult questions that may arise .
Perhaps it was a coincidence , but in the several hours that I was in the chamber and building , not one guide entered the gas chamber .
Traditional historians would undoubtedly like to see the infamous Dachau gas chamber simply fade away .
Playing no role in the Holocaust , it serves no real purpose .
The many problems and inconsistencies make it more of an embarrassment than asset to the orthodox view .
And in truth it is more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to undermine major aspects of the entire Holocaust story .
A purpose-built gas chamber , right on German soil , sitting for two years…but ‘ never used ’ ?
So maybe all those other gas chambers in Poland were likewise ‘ never used ’ ?
All those indications of reconstruction , alteration , fraud…perhaps recurring in places like Auschwitz and Majdanek ?
[ 16 ] A complicit mass media , directed by the Sulzbergers , Pulitzers , Goldwyns , Cohns , and Selznicks of the world , happy to play along , unwilling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impartial investigation…could that happen today ?
And a situation rife with American lies to justify Allied war crimes and defend a tragic story of jewish suffering…what shall we make of that ?
Best not to ask too many questions .

Reexamining the “Gas Chamber” of Dachau
By Thomas Dalton Published: 2011-12-01
Of the Dachau crematorium called “Barrack X,” one can read the following on the Web site of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum: “There is no credible evidence that the gas chamber in Barrack X was used to murder human beings.”[1] A strange situation indeed, given that the facility, built in late 1942 and completed by May 1943,[2] allegedly contained a dedicated homicidal gas chamber of substantial size—about 39 square meters (425 square feet), sufficient to gas nearly 400 people at a time, on the traditional view. Why would the Germans build such a dedicated facility, and then never use it?—not a single mass gassing, in nearly two years?[3] Is there perhaps another story here? And what can we learn from examining the facility today?
The following study is the result of my personal visit to Dachau over a period of three days in mid-2011. All photos included below are my own. Photo 1 shows the exterior of the crematorium building, with the external wall of the gas chamber on the left (behind the water downspout). Photo 2 is the current floor plan.
Photo 1: Crematorium exterior (gas chamber area at left).
Photo 2: Crematorium floor plan (room 5 = gas chamber).
In the immediate aftermath of the war, no doubt was expressed or entertained that the crematorium contained a homicidal chamber. An official US Army report, issued within days of takeover of the camp, was unequivocal. In Dachau the Germans conducted a “systematic policy of extermination” (Perry 2000: 14-15)—though today we know that no such thing ever occurred or was even planned. There were “a total of five gas chambers” (p. 44), the largest disguised as a shower. In it, 15 fake shower heads were installed, “from which gas was then released” (p. 52).
The Nuremberg Tribunal proceedings contain two important references, the first in the so-called Chavez Report, dated 7 May 1945:
“The new [crematorium] building had a gas chamber for executions… The gas chamber was labeled ‘shower room’ over the entrance and was a large room with airtight doors and double-glassed lights, sealed and gas proof. The ceiling was studded with dummy shower heads. A small observation peephole, double-glassed and hermetically sealed, was used to observe the conditions of the victims. There were grates in the floor. Hydrogen cyanide was mixed in the room below, and rose into the gas chamber and out the top vents.”
Now, the showerheads no longer supply the deadly gas, but it emanates from the floor. There is indeed a cellar room below the gas chamber, but we have no evidence at all that it was a ‘Zyklon mixing room,’ or that such gas entered the room from below. Today there are six floor vents in the room, and by all accounts they are, and have always been, actual water drains (photo 3). This is logical, because the room was likely built from the start as an ordinary inmate shower facility.
Photo 3: Gas chamber floor.
American newspapers were quick to report the gruesome news. A visit by some prominent journalists on May 2, arranged by General Eisenhower, was reported in the New York Times:
“One of the worst death traps seen by the party was a gas chamber at Dachau disguised as a bathhouse. Mr. [Gideon] Seymour described it as a room about 30 by 20 feet square, with 25 rows of perforated pipes overhead. There were no water connections to the showers, but instead the pipes were supplied from the same gas pipes that led to the cremation chambers. … In the chamber walls, Mr. Seymour said, were small glass ‘peepholes’ through which the German guards could observe the dying agonies of the condemned.” (9 May 1945, p. 17)
Here we see an immediate contradiction with the first two reports: no gas from showerheads, no gassing through floor vents, but rather rows of overhead perforated pipes. Also, the alleged connection with the ductwork of the cremation chamber (room #8 in Photo 2) is absurd; there is no conceivable reason to run Zyklon gas, which is flammable, into a furnace room. And the reported floor area of roughly 600 square feet—versus today’s figure of 425—is a significant overestimate.
Further confusion would come soon after the Chavez report, when, in an American investigation report of May 15, it was stated that “The supply of gas into the chamber was controlled by means of two valves on one of the outer walls… The gas was let into the chamber through pipes terminating in perforated brass fixtures set into the ceiling.”[4] No gas from the floor, no rows of perforated pipes, but now “perforated brass fixtures.” Today, incidentally, there is no evidence whatsoever of brass fixtures. Significantly, the May 15 report also stated that “the ceiling was some 10 feet in height.” Today it is about 2.15 meters, or 6 feet 10 inches. This is a huge discrepancy, and not attributable to misjudgment; clearly the ceiling was lowered, after takeover by the Americans.
The second Nuremberg reference came in testimony by Dr. Franz Blaha, a Czech prisoner and four-year inmate. He stated:
“Many executions by gas or shootings or injections took place right in the camp. The gas chamber was completed in 1944, and I was called by Dr. Rascher to examine the first victims. Of the eight or nine persons in the chamber there were three still alive… Many prisoners were later killed in this way.”
A puzzle: Blaha claims the chamber was completed only in 1944, but experts today insist that it was part of the original construction that began in 1942. The NYT reported on Blaha’s testimony in November 1945, dramatically stating that he was “assigned to work in the death chamber of the hospital”—meaning, of course, the mortuary. Blaha told of decapitations and the creation of shrunken heads, and of skin made into “gloves, lampshades, riding breeches, house-slippers, handbags” and other items (all such claims have since been completely discredited, putting Blaha’s credibility into serious doubt). He also recalled “the wholesale execution of Russian prisoners in a gas chamber… He declared that a quick death in the gas chamber had been meted out to the sick prisoners transferred to Dachau from other camps” (Nov. 17, p. 7).
Meanwhile the NYT continued to report on the alleged gassing atrocities. For example, it reported statements by one Colonel Jaworski that “jews had been ‘ruthlessly wiped out’ by hanging and firing squad and gas chambers at Dachau. Frequently they were paraded into a gas chamber, told to strip for shower and then left to die when the gas was turned on” (21 October, p. 11)—as if the gas chamber were like some household oven.
As one can imagine, questions eventually arose regarding the veracity of these gas chamber reports.[5] The first challenges appeared in 1950, with Paul Rassinier’s book Le mensonge d’Ulysse, and Maurice Bardèche’s Nuremberg, both in French. In 1954, the German Ludwig Paulin published an article, “The lie of the 238,000: What happened in camp Dachau?,” in which he disputed the existence of a gas chamber.[6] Two months later, another article appeared in the same journal, pseudonymously written by American military attorney Stephen Pinter. Pinter claimed to have visited all the western camps, including Dachau, without finding any credible evidence for homicidal gas chambers.[7]
In 1958, Louis Marschalko published the book The World Conquerors. He argues that, upon takeover by the Americans, captive Germans “were ordered subsequently to build various additional buildings with the greatest possible speed” (p. 155). They constructed “blood-pits” and a “hanging tree,” and destroyed gardens and flowerbeds that might detract from the ‘death camp’ image. Marschalko adds, “The shower-baths, dressing rooms, and reception halls had to be rebuilt so that they should appear like gas-chambers” (p. 156).
In June of 1959, Pinter spoke out again, publishing the follow statement in a letter to a Catholic periodical:
“I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any of the other concentration camps in Germany.” (Our Sunday Visitor, June 14, p. 15)
Former inmate and Catholic bishop Johannes Neuhäusler claimed, in 1960, that no gas chamber had ever been put into use at the camp.[8] Two months later, orthodox German historian Martin Broszat issued a letter confirming that “Neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were jews or other prisoners gassed.”[9]
Admission of no gassing at the camp was an important milestone, but the much more serious charge of deliberate deception continued to appear. In 1961, the journal of the British National Party, Combat, published an article titled “Jewish Deceit at Dachau”:
“When Dachau fell into Western hands in 1945, it had to look the part, so…it was transformed into a showplace of horrors. … The camp had to have a gas chamber, so, since one did not exist, it was decided to pretend that the shower bath had been one. Previously it had flagstones to a height of about four feet [on the walls]. Similar flagstones were taken [from the adjacent room] and put above those in the shower bath, and a new lower ceiling was created at the top of this second row of flagstones, with iron funnels in it (the [fake] inlets for the gas).” (Combat, Jan/Feb 1961, issue #10, p. 4).
Indeed, the gas chamber ceiling today is 2.15 meters high, but the adjacent room height is 2.9 meters—a full 75 cm (30 inch) differential.
Whoever lowered the ceiling and installed the ‘fake showerheads’ did a remarkably crude job. Today it appears as a poured concrete ceiling, smooth and white, into which someone roughly chiseled several funnel-shaped holes. Of the 15 such holes, 13 have an open metal funnel, one is complete with perforated head, and the last is fully exposed—see Photos 4, 5, 6.
Photo 4: “Fake shower heads.”
Photo 5: Sole remaining intact head.
Photo 6: Missing funnel.
In most cases one can see, faintly, evidence of rework to the ceiling after the ‘shower heads’ were installed—see Photo 7.
Photo 7: Rework to ceiling around shower head.
By the 1960s, talk of mass killings in a “Dachau gas chamber” subsided significantly. Raul Hilberg’s magnum opus, Destruction of the European Jews, contains virtually no mention of such a gas chamber—either in his first (1961) edition or in his massive, 3-volume 2003 edition. Paul Berben’s Dachau 1933-1945: The Official History states flatly that “the Dachau gas-chamber was never operated” (1975: 8).[10] Laqueur (2001: 240) briefly discusses the Blaha testimony and his claim that “several executions were carried out in the Dachau gas chamber.” Laqueur concludes that, because of the “mantle of secrecy” that surrounded Barrack X (the crematorium) and the fact that we have “only one unequivocal testimony”—that of Blaha—that therefore “it is difficult to corroborate Blaha’s statements and say with certainty whether the Dachau gas chamber was ever used for its designed purpose.”
The most definitive recent study is Harold Marcuse’s Legacies of Dachau (2001). This 590-page book contains numerous details on the camp construction and history, and yet has scarcely a mention of the infamous gas chamber. He claims, without evidence, that “only trial gassings” were conducted at the camp.[11] He cites a 1960 exhibit in the crematorium that included a sign with a striking admission: “This room would have been used as an undressing and waiting room if the gas chamber had worked” (p. 254). Marcuse dismisses this claim, stating, again without evidence, that it was in fact used “on at least two groups of prisoners.” He quickly adds that “it was indeed never used for systematic gassings…”
Other recent works seem to completely overlook Dachau, as if it played no role whatsoever in the Holocaust. Longerich’s authoritative Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews (2010), for example, has only passing mention of the camp on three or four scattered pages (out of 645 total), and no reference to a gas chamber there at all.
Even as late as 2003, there was an official sign there stating: “GAS CHAMBER: disguised as a ‘shower room’—never used as a gas chamber.” Today there is one wall sign that says, “This was the center of potential (!) mass murder.” Another sign states that the chamber “was not used for mass murder. Survivors have testified that the SS did, however, murder individual prisoners and small groups here using poison gas.”[12] Evidently the story of a ‘homicidal gas chamber’ must be maintained at all costs.
* * * * *
There are other reasons to be suspicious, and other indications that something is not quite right with the official history. Let’s return to the room itself. Photo 8 shows the interior entrance door and the infamous “Brausebad” (‘shower’) sign, looking on through to the exterior exit door.
Photo 8: Entrance to gas chamber.
Both entrance and exit have similar, heavy, vault-like metal doors. The entrance door is wedged in place against the floor and cannot move, but the exit door swings freely. The problem is that it does not close. The following two photos (9 and 10) show that this door hits on the locking pin; it cannot close and cannot seal ‘gas tight’. In fact the door is roughly half an inch too wide for the pin. This is no minor adjustment. The doorway was significantly altered since its original construction. But we do not know when, or for what purpose. It may have been as part of covert American alterations immediately after the war, or it could have simply reflected the general conversion of the camp to a ‘memorial’ and tourist destination in the early 1960s—it clearly would not do to have tourists locking each other in the room. (But of course, with one door wedged open, this could not happen…another strange fact.)
Photo 9: Exit door obstruction.
Photo 10: Exit door obstruction.
During my visit I came prepared to do a unique bit of analysis: I brought along a hand-held wall metal detector.[13] I cannot claim any astounding new discoveries, but I did a fairly careful scan of all four interior walls and the ceiling. The walls had virtually no metal at all, at least to the scanning depth of three inches. The ceiling, by contrast, showed extensive metal content, almost throughout the entire extent. There was no evident pattern, just a more or less continuous positive reading. This would suggest some kind of heavy wire mesh, perhaps associated with the poured concrete.[14] It was not possible to detect the presence or absence of individual pipes in the ceiling.
Another feature of interest is the pair of “Zyklon gassing ports.” In the (one) exterior wall we find two large (70 x 40 cm) openings, with a heavy metal grating on the interior—see Photos 11 and 12. Allegedly, the Zyklon pellets were dumped into a chute on the exterior of the building (Photo 13) and then either were trapped by the grill, or spilled through onto the floor. The grill was there to prevent the victims from interfering with this process.
Photo 11: Two Zyklon ports.
Photo 12: Zyklon port and grill.
Photo 13: Two Zyklon chutes.
There are several problems with this set-up. First, the chutes are welded open, so that no one can verify the closure, air-tight seal, etc. Second, the process is very crude—hardly better than just tossing an open Zyklon can into the room as the door is being slammed shut. Third, the first few dead bodies could have easily blocked the grates, putting a quick end to the gassing process. Then there is the problem of cleanup: How were the operators supposed to collect up those deadly Zyklon pellets, which would continue to emit gas for two hours or more, long after the victims were dead? To this we have no answer.
Furthermore, it is a very inefficient scheme at best; the poison gas would only slowly and unevenly diffuse into the room. Better to employ some kind of heated, forced-air system that would quickly circulate the deadly gas. And in fact, the Germans had precisely such a system—and only three rooms away. Room #1 (see Photo 2) contains four actual Zyklon disinfesting chambers, with sophisticated dispensing systems. Photo 14 shows the exterior of these chambers, and Photo 15 the machine for opening and retaining the pellets, and forcing hot air through them. These rooms were very effective at delousing linens, clothing, and personal items, and thus preventing the spread of the deadly typhus disease.[15] Evidently the Germans wanted to spare lives in the camp, not end them.
Photo 14: Delousing chamber.
Photo 15: Hot-air fumigation device.
And one further oddity: The Zyklon chutes show clear signs of being installed after the original building construction. In close-up views of the chutes, we can see that the concrete mortar is clearly different than that used for the remainder of the wall—finer quality, more viscous, and of different composition. See Photos 16 (left chute), 17 (right chute), and the detail in Photo 18.
Photo 16: Left Zyklon chute.
Photo 17: Right Zyklon chute.
Photo 18: Mortar variation in right chute.
There would not be such a discrepancy in the construction material if the gas chamber and chutes were installed at the time of construction, as the experts insist to this day. Evidently someone broke into the completed brick wall at a later date to install the chutes—perhaps at the direction of the occupying Americans.
While they were at it, someone, at some later date, significantly altered the crematorium chimney. Compare the following Photo 19, from the summer of 1944, with Photo 1, which I explicitly took from the same perspective.
Photo 19: Crematorium in summer 1944.
The new chimney is significantly shorter, and thus, at the very least, someone removed the top 10 or 20 feet. They also added some sort of white banding strips at two points. There is no obvious explanation for this reconstruction. Well-built brick chimneys survive for literally hundreds of years. More riddles.
Finally there is a huge question mark around the piping and ductwork that runs above and behind the room. Various drawings and studies over the years indicate numerous changes, alterations, additions, and reconstructions—to the point where the present system is nonsensical. A properly-designed chamber would be clear and simple: a single air duct connected at opposite ends of the room (to recirculate the poison gas), an in-line air heater (to improve gasification), a remote (attic or backroom) Zyklon introduction device, and a simple pair of inlet/outlet chimneys for cleansing the chamber of the deadly gas. Instead we find, by all indications, an absurd, jury-rigged system of pipes, valves, and condensers, one that bears all the marks of a series of postwar constructions. In all likelihood the room was designed and built as an actual shower, which was then reconstructed, with the lower ceiling, to meet American expectations of what a ‘gas chamber’ should look like.
One can imagine what visitors learn of all this when they see the camp today. Entrance is free and there are no official guides, so various groups pass through with various self-appointed ‘expert’ guides. However, when it comes to the crematorium (Barrack X), there seems to be a set routine. The group gathers outside the building as the guide briefly explains the ‘assembly-line process’ of undressing, gassing, cremating, etc. He then sends them in at one end, and they pass through the several rooms of the building (see again the floor plan in Photo 2), emerging from the furnace room, where the guide is dutifully waiting. No guide accompanies the groups inside—all the better to avoid any pointed and difficult questions that may arise. Perhaps it was a coincidence, but in the several hours that I was in the chamber and building, not one guide entered the gas chamber.
Traditional historians would undoubtedly like to see the infamous Dachau gas chamber simply fade away. Playing no role in the Holocaust, it serves no real purpose. The many problems and inconsistencies make it more of an embarrassment than asset to the orthodox view. And in truth it is more than an embarrassment; such deception threatens to undermine major aspects of the entire Holocaust story. A purpose-built gas chamber, right on German soil, sitting for two years…but ‘never used’? So maybe all those other gas chambers in Poland were likewise ‘never used’? All those indications of reconstruction, alteration, fraud…perhaps recurring in places like Auschwitz and Majdanek?[16] A complicit mass media, directed by the Sulzbergers, Pulitzers, Goldwyns, Cohns, and Selznicks of the world, happy to play along, unwilling to ask tough questions or conduct an impartial investigation…could that happen today? And a situation rife with American lies to justify Allied war crimes and defend a tragic story of jewish suffering…what shall we make of that? Best not to ask too many questions.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-10-31--“Massive Traffic Jams” Across Paris As People Flee Ahead Of Second COVID Lockdown

On Wednesday , French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would enter a full lockdown from midnight on Thursday until @ @ @ @ @ to the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic .
With hours to go before the @ @ @ @ @ , videos have surfaced on Twitter , showing massive traffic jams of people trying to @ @ @ @ @ go into effect .
“ Traffic is barely moving in every direction as far as @ @ @ @ @ Lots of honking and frustrated drivers , ” said one Twitter user .
Using real-time @ @ @ @ @ , in fact , the videos posted by citizen journalists in Paris are accurate – @ @ @ @ @ of the city is in serious gridlock .
TomTom real-time data shows a massive spike @ @ @ @ @ the highest congestion so far this week , as lockdowns are only a few hours @ @ @ @ @ Paris ahead of lockdowns , it wouldn ’ t be shocking if anti-lockdown protests flared @ @ @ @ @ weekend .

By Tyler Durden
On Wednesday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would enter a full lockdown from midnight on Thursday until the end of November due to the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic.
With hours to go before the month-long national lockdown takes effect, videos have surfaced on Twitter, showing massive traffic jams of people trying to escape the city as lockdowns go into effect.
“Traffic is barely moving in every direction as far as the eye can see. Lots of honking and frustrated drivers,” said one Twitter user.
Incredible traffic jam in Paris as people try to leave the city before 9 pm curfew and before confinement begins at midnight. Traffic is barely moving in every direction as far as the eye can see. Lots of honking and frustrated drivers. pic.twitter.com/6Zn2HCxuPl — Michael E. Webber (@MichaelEWebber) October 29, 2020
Repeating in English – lots of traffic jams around #Paris tonight. Not clear but could be people leaving the capital before #LockDown2 kicks in. #France #confinement2 pic.twitter.com/UGa13x8JVe — S Kar-Gupta (@SKGLondonTown) October 29, 2020
Using real-time data to confirm, that, in fact, the videos posted by citizen journalists in Paris are accurate – TomTom traffic data shows much of the city is in serious gridlock.
TomTom real-time data shows a massive spike in Traffic Thursday night, the highest congestion so far this week, as lockdowns are only a few hours away.
While people flee Paris ahead of lockdowns, it wouldn’t be shocking if anti-lockdown protests flared up across the city this weekend.
Source: Zerohedge
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-10-31--Men Who Did Not Eat Meat Led the Last Real Resistance to the jew World Order

I am often told how I am doing a great disservice to our folk and our ‘ movement ’ by promoting a plant-based diet , which has worked so well for me .
The critics say that this diet is not traditional , it makes us weak , and it is what the NWO wants for all of us .
While I can acknowledge that many European people ( not all ) did eat some meat over the ages , that there are some weak vegans who do not eat good food ( just as there are weak and obese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ celebrities have been pushing ‘ veganism ’ , I still contend that by ditching meat and dairy , our people would be far better off .
I am not alone in the assertion that we would benefit greatly from no longer eating animals , as the leadership of the Third Reich also felt this way , long before it became fashionable .
Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian who planned to wean the German nation off of meat after the war , and saw a meatless future for the whole world .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said : Joseph Goebbels , who was not a vegetarian , wrote in his diary in 1942 : An extended chapter of our talk was devoted by the Führer to the vegetarian question .
He believes more than ever that meat-eating is harmful to humanity .
Of course he knows that during the war we can not completely upset our food system .
After the war , however , he intends to tackle this problem also .
Maybe he is right .
Certainly the arguments that he adduces in favor of his standpoint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the only NSDAP member to abstaining from consuming animal flesh .
Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess was also a committed vegetarian as was Reichsführer of the Schutzstaffel Heinrich Himmler , who wanted to completely ban the hunting of animals .
Abstaining from meat-eating was not only about human health , but also about eliminating the suffering of Earth ’ s animals , of which Hitler was so fond .
One of Hitler ’ s many objections to judeo-Christianity related to the distinction made between humans and the rest of the animals , which are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and souls .
Do you know that your Führer is a vegetarian , and that he does not eat meat because of his general attitude toward life and his love for the world of animals ?
Do you know that your Führer is an exemplary friend of animals , and even as a chancellor , he is not separated from the animals he has kept for years ?
…The Führer is an ardent opponent of any torture of animals , in particular vivisection , and has declared to terminate those conditions…thus fulfilling his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from continuous and nameless torments and pain .
Some of the first legislation put forth under the National Socialists related to animal welfare , such as the banning of vivisection , fox hunting , and other forms of animal cruelty .
In today ’ s world , caring about animals is seen to be a “ lefty ” issue , but it should really just be a human issue .
When you look into all of the research regarding the benefits of a whole foods plant-based diet , you find that not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it also greatly benefits us .
Going over all of this material would take an entire book and is not the point of this article , so I encourage you to do your own research if interested .
The next time you hear about how not eating animals is a jewish/NWO agenda , I hope you are able to see through the BS and realize that the last large-scale resistance to worldwide jewish power was led by vegetarians and ardent supporters of animal rights .

I am often told how I am doing a great disservice to our folk and our ‘movement’ by promoting a plant-based diet, which has worked so well for me. The critics say that this diet is not traditional, it makes us weak, and it is what the NWO wants for all of us. While I can acknowledge that many European people (not all) did eat some meat over the ages, that there are some weak vegans who do not eat good food (just as there are weak and obese meat eaters) and that some Hollywood celebrities have been pushing ‘veganism’, I still contend that by ditching meat and dairy, our people would be far better off.
I am not alone in the assertion that we would benefit greatly from no longer eating animals, as the leadership of the Third Reich also felt this way, long before it became fashionable. Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian who planned to wean the German nation off of meat after the war, and saw a meatless future for the whole world.
According to the Table Talks, in 1941 Hitler said:
One may regret living at a period when it’s impossible to form an idea of the shape the world of the future will assume. But there’s one thing I can predict to eaters of meat: the world of the future will be vegetarian.”
Joseph Goebbels, who was not a vegetarian, wrote in his diary in 1942:
An extended chapter of our talk was devoted by the Führer to the vegetarian question. He believes more than ever that meat-eating is harmful to humanity. Of course he knows that during the war we cannot completely upset our food system. After the war, however, he intends to tackle this problem also. Maybe he is right. Certainly the arguments that he adduces in favor of his standpoint are very compelling.
Hitler was not the only NSDAP member to abstaining from consuming animal flesh. Deputy Fuhrer Rudolf Hess was also a committed vegetarian as was Reichsführer of the Schutzstaffel Heinrich Himmler, who wanted to completely ban the hunting of animals.
Abstaining from meat-eating was not only about human health, but also about eliminating the suffering of Earth’s animals, of which Hitler was so fond. One of Hitler’s many objections to judeo-Christianity related to the distinction made between humans and the rest of the animals, which are seen to be creatures devoid of feelings and souls.
Neugeist/Die Weisse Fahne, a pro-NS children’s magazine reported :
Do you know that your Führer is a vegetarian, and that he does not eat meat because of his general attitude toward life and his love for the world of animals? Do you know that your Führer is an exemplary friend of animals, and even as a chancellor, he is not separated from the animals he has kept for years?…The Führer is an ardent opponent of any torture of animals, in particular vivisection, and has declared to terminate those conditions…thus fulfilling his role as the savior of animals, from continuous and nameless torments and pain.
Some of the first legislation put forth under the National Socialists related to animal welfare, such as the banning of vivisection, fox hunting, and other forms of animal cruelty.
In today’s world, caring about animals is seen to be a “lefty” issue, but it should really just be a human issue. When you look into all of the research regarding the benefits of a whole foods plant-based diet, you find that not only does it benefit our animal friends, but it also greatly benefits us. Going over all of this material would take an entire book and is not the point of this article, so I encourage you to do your own research if interested.
The next time you hear about how not eating animals is a jewish/NWO agenda, I hope you are able to see through the BS and realize that the last large-scale resistance to worldwide jewish power was led by vegetarians and ardent supporters of animal rights.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA