renegadetribune--2020-08-26--Gates and Big Tech “Reimagine” Post-Human Education: The “New Normal” is A.I. Data-Mining for “Socia

Gates and Big Tech “Reimagine” Post-Human Education: The “New Normal” is A.I. Data-Mining for “Social Credit”

Note : This article first appeared in the July edition of the Counter Markets newsletter .
In 1982 , Special Advisor to the Department of Education ’ s Office of Research and Improvement , Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt , blew the whistle on Project BEST ( Better Education Skills through Technology ) .
A sub-project of President Ronald Reagan ’ s Private Sector Initiative , Project BEST was a plan to corporatize the American education system through public-private partnerships with Big Tech companies which replace human teachers with Skinnerian “ teaching machines ” programmed with psychological conditioning algorithms that train students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Now , almost fifty years later , the next phase of Project BEST is being rammed through under the duress of COVID-19 lockdown , which has forced the entire US education system to shut down brick-and-mortar classrooms with human teachers in order to convert to virtual schools that deliver online instruction through “ adaptive learning ” software ( the modern digitalized version of the “ Skinner box ” teaching computers engineered for Project BEST ) and “ socio-emotional learning ( SEL ) ” biofeedback wearables ( devices that data-mine students ’ “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
While teachers and students are held virtual hostage during COVID lockdown , “ Disaster Capitalists ” are using the “ Shock Doctrine ” of “ Creative Destruction ” to exploit the crisis by deregulating the new federal rules for “ Distance Learning and Innovation ” ( 85 FR 18638 ) , which relax the oversight requirements for “ adaptive learning ” systems of “ artificial intelligence , ” such as Knewton and Clever , which are both funded by Bilderberger Peter Thiel : the speech writer for former US Secretary of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charge of Project BEST .
At the same time , emergency COVID funds are being dished out by the current Secretary of Ed , Betsy DeVos , as the Department of Ed is paying out federal CARES Act aid to finance school districts in their efforts to “ upgrade ” their “ technology infrastructure ” with adaptive-learning AI and SEL data-mining that can be facilitated through virtual charter-schooling corporations , such as K12 Inc. , which was set up by Bennett and funded by DeVos .
Fueled by this windfall of CARES stimulus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on May 5th his emergency COVID plans to “ Build Back Better ” through a partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Bilderberger Eric Schmidt , who is “ Technical Advisor ” of Alphabet Inc. , which is Google ’ s parent company .
This partnership between the State of New York , the Technical Advisor of Google ’ s parent company , and the Gates Foundation is called “ Reimagine Education ” : the same subtitle that Secretary DeVos has given to a special CARES competition called “ Reimagine Workforce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cuomo ’ s announcement to “ Reimagine Education , ” the corporate media has published no further reports detailing any specifics of this public-private educational partnership between New York , the Gates Foundation , and Alphabet ’ s CEO .
But a review of the Gates Foundation ’ s educational grants over the months during COVID lockdown indicate that New York ’ s “ Reimagine ” partnership will “ Build Back Better ” by implementing Big Data platforms that aggregate adaptive-learning algorithms and SEL biometrics from the entire student body in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the purposes of prescribing students into workforce job castes through virtual “ career pathways ” curriculums regimented by a technocratically planned economy .
Looking into grantees in the Gates Foundation ’ s “ Grants ” database , it appears that Gates contracts with the New York non-profit InnovateEDU , which partners with Google , are a key pillar of the Reimagine Education revolution being pushed by Gates , Cuomo , and Schmidt .
In the months of April and May during COVID lockdown , the Gates Foundation paid out two grants to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ developed a “ Data Extraction Tool for Google Classroom During COVID-19.
” By aggregating all student and teacher data collected through “ Google Classroom Connector , ” InnovateEDU ’ s “ Data Extraction Tool ” links up with Google ’ s “ BigQuery ” in order to centralize and streamline data-mining of student-learning metrics , including cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional algorithms , which can track students into career-pathways programmed to fill job quotas in a planned economy .
Funded by a total of $ 2,297,584 in Gates Foundation grants , InnovateEDU describes itself on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York-based InnvoateEDU self-describes its mission with the slogan “ re-imagine .
.
.
education , ” which echoes the title of Governor Cuomo ’ s Reimagine Education partnership the Gates Foundation and Alphabet ’ s Technical Advisor , Eric Schmidt , who was also the former CEO of Google .
The Brooklyn-based InnovateEDU , which “ partners with innovation-friendly New York City public schools , ” is jockeying to “ help ” with COVID “ distance learning ” by “ personalizing ” student edu-conditioning through “ next generation learning models and tools ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. where Schmidt is currently CEO .
A press release from InnovateEDU announces that its contract with Google sets up a “ free , open-source Google Classroom Connector to any school or district that utilizes G Suite for Education.
” The PR Newswire press release , which is titled “ InnovateEDU Develops Free , Open-Source Data Extraction Tool for Google Classroom During COVID-19 , ” states that , Once a school or district runs the Google Classroom Connector in their Google Cloud environment , they will be able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Google Classroom data to one place in BigQuery ; • Gain access to a variety of Google Classroom data ranging from percentage of students completing assignments or the number of classes that have been created ; • Copy and use InnovateEDU ’ s Google Classroom report templates in their own Data Studio instance ; and • Maintain data securely in their district ’ s Google Cloud environment and allows administrators and teachers to gain meaningful insights into Google Classroom .
To simplify , this corporate partnership between Google and InnovateEDU aggregates Google Classroom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their teaching and learning metrics into the BigQuery database , which can be data-mined by school administrators and their public-private ed-tech partners in order to improve learning outcomes by “ personalizing ” digital lessons , including competency-based workforce-conditioning lessons tailored to students ’ unique cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional psychometrics .
In sum , five days before ( April 30th ) and then seven days after ( May 12th ) New York ’ s Governor Cuomo announced his Reimagine Education partnership with Alphabet ’ s Eric Schmidt and the Gates Foundation ( May 5th ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which “ reimagine [ s ] .
.
.
education , ” received two grants from the Gates Foundation .
Six days later ( May 18th ) , InnovateEDU announced its mission to help COVID “ distance learning ” through its new BigQuery data-mining partnership with Google : a subsidiary of Schmidt ’ s Alphabet Inc. Google Wants to Send Your Kids Socio-Emotional “ Wellness Checks ” to Data-Mine Their “ Mental Health ” About two weeks before Cuomo announced New York ’ s Reimagine partnership with Schmidt and Gates , Google published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Check in on Emotional Well-Being During Distance Learning , ” which promotes the use of various Google platforms to facilitate “ social emotional learning ” to help students with the added stresses of COVID lockdown .
The author of the Google Keyword article , Alicia Salmeron , who is a member of the Google for Education Team , encourages teachers to utilize Google ’ s G Suite for Education ( GSFE ) to “ [ c ] reate emotional check-in opportunities ” by With the help of InnovatEDU ’ s BigQuery partnership @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Google ’ s GSFE platforms can be aggregated and data-mined to improve “ personalized ” SEL lessons that are aligned with standardized SEL “ competencies ” regimented by the Collaborative for Academic , Social , and Emotional Learning ( CASEL ) , which is endorsed by Google .
It should be noted here that GSFE , formerly known as Google Apps for Education ( GAFE ) , was sued by University of California-Berkley students , along with hundreds of class-action litigants from twenty-one other states , because GAFE allegedly excavated their student emails @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & D .
Education Week reports that , With so many lawsuits filed against Google for its illegal data-mining of GAFE/GSFE apps , how will InnovateEDU ’ s partnership with BigQuery be used to ramp up Google ’ s dragnet practices of tracking and selling student data , including socioemotional-learning metrics , to third parties ?
In the meantime , during the COVID lockdown , the Gates Foundation has issued a $ 213,640 grant to the Fund for the City of New York “ to support research around the relationship between growth in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” This Gates grant bankrolls the City of New York to finance competency-based SEL , which is streamlined by Google through the use of GSFE apps that are data-mined by BigQuery linked to the New York-based InnovateEDU , which is funded by the Gates Foundation .
From inBloom to Learnsphere to BigQuery .
.
.
from Big Data to Big Brother This BigQuery datahub , which compiles InnovateEDU ’ s Google Classroom data into a single digital platform , is essentially akin to the Learnsphere database that is modeled after the defunct inBloom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ World Order : The Technocratic Globalization of Corporatized Education , I document how Learnsphere , like its inBloom predecessor , is a massive public-private repository that aggregates data , such as students ’ cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional “ learning analytics , ” from schools across the globe in order to build better e-learning products through “ machine learning ” and “ deep learning ” algorithms engineered for the purposes of evolving artificial intelligence for ed-tech .
Originally called the Shared Learning Collaborative , inBloom was created with funding from the Gates Foundation and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of which are currently financing InnovateEDU .
From 2011 to 2014 , inBloom partnered with the New York City School District to tabulate copious student data through an operating system from the NewsCorp subsidiary Wireless Generation , which then aggregated these student data in a web cloud managed by the Amazon Corporation , which has also built a similar web-based computing cloud that streamlines data dossiers for the Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ) .
In 2014 , after fighting against testimony from the Electronic Privacy Information Center ( EPIC ) , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York State Supreme Court , inBloom caved in to mounting public backlash against its third-party data-sharing practices as it terminated all of its contracts and shut down all operations .
Picking up where inBloom left off , a $ 5 million grant from the federal government through the National Science Foundation was dispersed to Carnegie Mellon University for the purposes of launching Learnsphere , a not-for-profit “ distributed ” repository for digitally sharing student data with third parties including for-profit vendors .
Learnsphere ’ s “ distributed infrastructure ” consists of several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data repository [ that ] contains datasets from secondary school interactions with an online tutoring system , in many cases as part of online experiments of what learning works best.
” To simplify , Learnsphere ’ s “ Data Mining Workbench ” aggregates student data so that “ learning scientists ” can evolve AI ed-tech through a “ machine-learning tool ” that scans “ learning analytics ” from “ behavior categories , ” such as cognitive-behavioral stimulus-response algorithms and socioemotional-biofeedback algorithms that track “ unresponsiveness , off-task conversation , help avoidance , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LearnLab DataShops , the “ learning scientists ” who are eligible to access Learnsphere ’ s digital edu-conditioning databanks include “ Educational data miner [ s ] , ” such as “ Computer scientist [ s ] , Psychometrician [ s ] , [ and ] Learning analytics researcher [ s ] ” ; “ Course developer [ s ] [ and ] Educational technology researcher [ s ] , ” such as “ ITS/AIED researcher [ s ] [ and ] User modeling researcher [ s ] ” ; and “ Psychologist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Cognitive scientist [ s ] [ and ] Educational psychologist [ s ] .
” In brief , Learnsphere ’ s distributed databases are collated so that “ learning engineers ” can synthesize massive pools of students ’ psychological data for the purposes of evolving adaptive-learning and SEL-biofeedback algorithms to build artificial intelligence for ed-tech .
Like Learnsphere and inBloom , InnovateEDU ’ s BigQuery partnership is a similar Big Data project geared to streamline and accelerate the evolution of socioemotional-biofeedback and cognitive-behavioral adaptive-learning algorithms for the purposes of progressively engineering “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” artificial intelligence designed by Big Tech companies that partner with Big Government to manage a techno-fascist planned economy .
It should be noted here that the Gates-funded InnovateEDU is also financed by the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation , the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation , the Silicon Valley Family Foundation , the New York Community Trust , and the New York City Department of Youth and Community Development .
In addition , the Co-Founder and Executive Director of InnovateEDU , Erin Mote , has It should also be noted that Mote “ leads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generation learning platform , student information system , and formative assessment engine that supports personalized learning.
” Mote ’ s colleague , Nicolle Beneventano , is InnovateEDU ’ s Project Manager for Cortex , which shares its own “ Ed-Fi operational data store ( ODS ) ” with Learnsphere ’ s Big Data repository .
In sum , between BigQuery and Cortex , InnovateEDU ’ s “ reimagine ” data-mining partnerships are expanding upon Learnsphere ’ s “ distributed infrastructure ” of Big Data analytics designed to evolve post-human AI ed-tech .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is part of its larger “ Disaster Capitalist ” mission to exploit COVID lockdown as an opportunity for “ Creative Destruction ” that will ram through the mass-institutionalization of “ disruptive technologies ” which “ destroy ” the tradition of human teachers in brick-and-mortar schoolrooms in order to “ create ” a new public-private industry of learning analytics engineered by communitarian partnerships between Big Tech and Big Government .
The partnership between Google and the Gates-financed InnovateEDU is a prime example of how the Reimagine Education campaign is fueled by a “ Disaster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Schumpeter ’ s economic principle of “ Creative Destruction ” by heavily subsidizing “ disruptive ” ed-tech that digitally automates school lessons through virtual classrooms which facilitate COVID “ distance learning ” by replacing human teachers and brick-and-mortar schoolhouses while the latter are forced to shut down due to COVID lockdown .
According to InnovateEDU ’ s company website , “ InnovateEDU is committed to massively disrupting [ my emphasis ] K-12 public education by focusing on the development of scalable tools and practices that leverage innovation , technology [ my emphasis ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ improve education for all students and close the achievement gap.
” By advancing “ technology ” to “ massively disrupt .
.
.
education ” for the purposes of “ leverag [ ing ] innovation , ” InnovateEDU is explicitly proclaiming its commitment to Schumpeter ’ s “ Creative Destruction ” economics .
And by exploiting the “ Shock Doctrine ” of COVID lockdown as an opportunity to partner with Google and the Gates Foundation to massively expand Big Data-mining through BigQuery , InnovateEDU is clearly exploiting “ Disaster Capitalist ” schemes to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its “ creative disruption ” of traditional schooling with technocratic AI learning analytics .
In brief , through partnerships with BigQuery and Cortex , the Gates-financed InnovateEDU is fulfilling its “ reimagination ” of education by expanding ed-tech data-tracking that “ massively disrupts ” traditional schooling by streamlining massive pools of cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional learning analytics to improve AI algorithms which will “ destroy ” traditional teacher feedback as new automated instructional algorithms are “ created ” to “ disrupt ” human teacher feedback with digital stimulus-response feedback programmed to condition students for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planned economy managed by “ human capital systems.
” In alignment with the Gates Foundation ’ s “ disruptive tech ” partnership with InnovateEDU , the Gates philanthropy has paid out $ 1,375,414 to the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation , which declares itself “ a nonprofit , nonpartisan think tank dedicated to improving the world through Disruptive Innovation … [ T ] he Institute offers a unique framework for understanding many of society ’ s most pressing issues including education , healthcare , and economic prosperity.
” In the fields of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Education , ” the Clayton Christensen thinktank promotes advancements in “ disruptive ” ed-tech “ Software and Hardware ” ( including “ adaptive learning ” courseware and other “ artificial intelligence ” programs ) .
The thinktank also advocates for “ disruptive innovation ” in K-12 and higher education through partnerships with “ For-Profit Providers ” on the cutting edge of “ Data & Assessment , ” “ Personalized and Blended Learning , ” “ Social-Emotional Learning ( SEL ) , ” “ Social Capital , ” “ Competency-Based Learning , ” and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during the COVID lockdown , three weeks after the announcement of the Gates-Schmidt-Cuomo collaboration to Reimagine Education , the Gates Foundation issued a special $ 294,914 grant to the Institute for Disruptive Innovation for the purposes of “ understand [ ing ] what motivates districts to adopt continuous improvement practices to improve outcomes that are predictive of post-secondary success.
” To sum up , the Gates Foundation ’ s partnerships with InnovateEDU and the Institute for Disruptive Innovation are illustrative of the Gates ’ philanthropy ’ s broader “ Disaster Capitalist ” enterprise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Destruction ” of the old schooling system in order to usher in a new techno-fascist system of AI edu-conditioning that Naomi Klein calls a “ Screen New Deal.
” Built on “ surveillance capitalism , ” what Klein labels as the “ Screen New Deal ” is nothing less than the next phase of Project BEST as the Gates Foundation bankrolls Reimagine Education partnerships with Big Tech corporations that deploy “ disruptive technologies ” for tracking students ’ learning analytics into psychological profiles which rank the students ’ cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional “ competence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” that determine their job placement in a digital workforce caste system .
The Gates Foundation ’ s Screen New Deal is not limited to the Reimagine Education initiative in the State of New York .
Indeed , the Gates Foundation ’ s “ Reimagine ” campaign is being mirrored by the US Department of Education , which has issued a national “ Reimagine Workforce Preparation ” competition that awards CARES stimulus money to schools applying for grants that pay for new “ career pathways ” curriculums facilitated by adaptive learning courseware and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Expanding the Screen New Deal agenda beyond the USA , the Gates Foundation has dumped out over a quarter billion dollars in grants to “ Reimagine ” educational institutions across the globe .
During the COVID-lockdown months from March 1st through June 2nd , the Gates Foundation poured out at least 203 grants totaling no less than $ 228,261,262 to “ Reimagine ” education systems across the globe .
These Gates grants financed corporate charter schools , public-private community schools , virtual/online edu-corporations , ed-tech companies , socioemotional-learning non-profits and universities on basically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grants set up public-private ed-tech infrastructures for “ social distance ” learning networks to be AI data-mined by Chinese-style “ Social Credit ” algorithms which score students ’ cognitive-behavioral , socio-emotional , and biological health metrics to determine the students ’ access to education , employment , healthcare , housing , transportation , and even due process .
• Post-Human AI Ed-Tech : More than 10 % of this quarter billion dollars was allocated “ for the advancement of post-human education through the technocratic digitalization of teaching and learning .
Specifically , $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in “ internet connectivity , ” “ ed-tech , ” “ instructional systems , ” “ virtual instruction , ” “ virtual tutoring , ” “ simulations , ” “ artificial intelligence , ” “ machine learning , ” and other digital “ tools ” and “ computer ” platforms to provide “ distance learning ” and “ blended learning ” that utilize “ data ” and “ algorithms ” to enable “ self-directed learning ” and “ personalize [ d ] learning ” for “ competency-based education.
” • Corporate-Fascist Workforce Planning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) has been allotted to finance the corporatization of education through public-private charter schools , including virtual charter schools and other “ school choice ” programs , including “ workforce development ” and “ economic planning ” projects , such as “ career pathways , ” “ cradle-to-career , ” and other “ school-to-work ” initiatives for “ lifelong learning.
” • COVID Tech Upgrades for “ Distance Learning ” and “ Contact Tracing ” : Another 24 % ( $ 56,404,599 ) is issued specifically for COVID expenses , including technology infrastructure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other “ social distancing ” procedures along with COVID “ surveillance ” for testing , tracking , and treatment .
It should be noted that an additional $ 119,284,137 ( 52 % ) are disseminated to “ Global Health ” projects at universities , such as “ human organ chip ” research and “ vaccine ” studies between Zheijiang University of China and GAVI ( the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations ) , which partners with Microsoft at the ID2020 Global Biometric Identification project : an international thinktank that promotes an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ microchip ” the whole planet .
With more than a quarter billion dollars dumped into a hi-tech concoction of post-human AI ed-tech that tracks psychometric and biometric data for workforce placement and contact tracing of COVID-19 , it is evident that the Gates Foundation ’ s technocratic stratagem to “ Reimagine ” global education is aiming to “ Build Back Better ” by setting up a global surveillance grid that institutes a worldwide system of dystopian “ Social Credit , ” which will utilize the “ internet of things ” to data-mine students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virtually dictate whether they get access to schools , jobs , hospitals , housing , transportation , and even due process .
Welcome to the School World Order .
John Klyczek has an MA in English and has taught college rhetoric and research argumentation for over eight years .
His literary scholarship concentrates on the history of global eugenics and Aldous Huxley ’ s dystopic novel , Brave New World .
He is the author of School World Order : The Technocratic Globalization of Corporatized Education ( TrineDay Books ) ; and he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Research on Globalization , OpEdNews , the Intrepid Report , the Dissident Voice , Blacklisted News , Activist Post , News With Views , The Saker , Rense News , David Icke News , Natural News , and the SGT Report .
He is also the Director of Writing and Editing at Black Freighter Productions ( BFP ) Books .
His website is schoolworldorder.info .

By John Klyczek
Note: This article first appeared in the July edition of the Counter Markets newsletter.
In 1982, Special Advisor to the Department of Education’s Office of Research and Improvement, Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, blew the whistle on Project BEST (Better Education Skills through Technology). A sub-project of President Ronald Reagan’s Private Sector Initiative, Project BEST was a plan to corporatize the American education system through public-private partnerships with Big Tech companies which replace human teachers with Skinnerian “teaching machines” programmed with psychological conditioning algorithms that train students for workforce placement in a planned economy.
Now, almost fifty years later, the next phase of Project BEST is being rammed through under the duress of COVID-19 lockdown, which has forced the entire US education system to shut down brick-and-mortar classrooms with human teachers in order to convert to virtual schools that deliver online instruction through “adaptive learning” software (the modern digitalized version of the “Skinner box” teaching computers engineered for Project BEST) and “socio-emotional learning (SEL)” biofeedback wearables (devices that data-mine students’ “stimulus-response” biometrics to implement Skinnerian operant-conditioning).
While teachers and students are held virtual hostage during COVID lockdown, “Disaster Capitalists” are using the “Shock Doctrine” of “Creative Destruction” to exploit the crisis by deregulating the new federal rules for “Distance Learning and Innovation” (85 FR 18638), which relax the oversight requirements for “adaptive learning” systems of “artificial intelligence,” such as Knewton and Clever, which are both funded by Bilderberger Peter Thiel: the speech writer for former US Secretary of Education Bill Bennet, who was in charge of Project BEST. At the same time, emergency COVID funds are being dished out by the current Secretary of Ed, Betsy DeVos, as the Department of Ed is paying out federal CARES Act aid to finance school districts in their efforts to “upgrade” their “technology infrastructure” with adaptive-learning AI and SEL data-mining that can be facilitated through virtual charter-schooling corporations, such as K12 Inc., which was set up by Bennett and funded by DeVos.
Fueled by this windfall of CARES stimulus, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced on May 5th his emergency COVID plans to “Build Back Better” through a partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Bilderberger Eric Schmidt, who is “Technical Advisor” of Alphabet Inc., which is Google’s parent company. This partnership between the State of New York, the Technical Advisor of Google’s parent company, and the Gates Foundation is called “Reimagine Education”: the same subtitle that Secretary DeVos has given to a special CARES competition called “Reimagine Workforce Preparation.”
After much public backlash following Cuomo’s announcement to “Reimagine Education,” the corporate media has published no further reports detailing any specifics of this public-private educational partnership between New York, the Gates Foundation, and Alphabet’s CEO. But a review of the Gates Foundation’s educational grants over the months during COVID lockdown indicate that New York’s “Reimagine” partnership will “Build Back Better” by implementing Big Data platforms that aggregate adaptive-learning algorithms and SEL biometrics from the entire student body in order to track such cognitive-behavioral and socioemotional data for the purposes of prescribing students into workforce job castes through virtual “career pathways” curriculums regimented by a technocratically planned economy.
Reimagine “Surveillance Capitalism” with InnovateEDU and Google Classroom
Looking into grantees in the Gates Foundation’s “Grants” database, it appears that Gates contracts with the New York non-profit InnovateEDU, which partners with Google, are a key pillar of the Reimagine Education revolution being pushed by Gates, Cuomo, and Schmidt. In the months of April and May during COVID lockdown, the Gates Foundation paid out two grants to the New York-based InnovateEDU, which has recently developed a “Data Extraction Tool for Google Classroom During COVID-19.” By aggregating all student and teacher data collected through “Google Classroom Connector,” InnovateEDU’s “Data Extraction Tool” links up with Google’s “BigQuery” in order to centralize and streamline data-mining of student-learning metrics, including cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional algorithms, which can track students into career-pathways programmed to fill job quotas in a planned economy.
Funded by a total of $2,297,584 in Gates Foundation grants, InnovateEDU describes itself on its website as
a Brooklyn-based [New York] non-profit whose mission is to eliminate the achievement gap by accelerating innovation in Common Core-aligned, next generation learning models and tools that serve, inform, and enhance teaching and learning. InnovateEDU convenes students, teachers, entrepreneurs, and designers to re-imagine [my emphasis] and reinvent education… We address trends in education, including: growth and use of technology and broadband infrastructure, advances in the learning sciences, [and] the societal drive toward personalization as an aspect of education innovation.
Notice that the New York-based InnvoateEDU self-describes its mission with the slogan “re-imagine . . . education,” which echoes the title of Governor Cuomo’s Reimagine Education partnership the Gates Foundation and Alphabet’s Technical Advisor, Eric Schmidt, who was also the former CEO of Google.
The Brooklyn-based InnovateEDU, which “partners with innovation-friendly New York City public schools,” is jockeying to “help” with COVID “distance learning” by “personalizing” student edu-conditioning through “next generation learning models and tools” facilitated by a corporate partnership with Google: a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. where Schmidt is currently CEO.
A press release from InnovateEDU announces that its contract with Google sets up a “free, open-source Google Classroom Connector to any school or district that utilizes G Suite for Education.” The PR Newswire press release, which is titled “InnovateEDU Develops Free, Open-Source Data Extraction Tool for Google Classroom During COVID-19,” states that,
Once a school or district runs the Google Classroom Connector in their Google Cloud environment, they will be able to:
Bring all of the Google Classroom data to one place in BigQuery;
Gain access to a variety of Google Classroom data ranging from percentage of students completing assignments or the number of classes that have been created;
Copy and use InnovateEDU’s Google Classroom report templates in their own Data Studio instance; and
Maintain data securely in their district’s Google Cloud environment and allows administrators and teachers to gain meaningful insights into Google Classroom.
To simplify, this corporate partnership between Google and InnovateEDU aggregates Google Classroom data from students and instructors by tabulating their teaching and learning metrics into the BigQuery database, which can be data-mined by school administrators and their public-private ed-tech partners in order to improve learning outcomes by “personalizing” digital lessons, including competency-based workforce-conditioning lessons tailored to students’ unique cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional psychometrics.
In sum, five days before (April 30th) and then seven days after (May 12th) New York’s Governor Cuomo announced his Reimagine Education partnership with Alphabet’s Eric Schmidt and the Gates Foundation (May 5th), New York’s InnovateEDU, which “reimagine[s] . . . education,” received two grants from the Gates Foundation. Six days later (May 18th), InnovateEDU announced its mission to help COVID “distance learning” through its new BigQuery data-mining partnership with Google: a subsidiary of Schmidt’s Alphabet Inc.
Google Wants to Send Your Kids Socio-Emotional “Wellness Checks” to Data-Mine Their “Mental Health”
About two weeks before Cuomo announced New York’s Reimagine partnership with Schmidt and Gates, Google published an article on its Keyword blog titled “Check in on Emotional Well-Being During Distance Learning,” which promotes the use of various Google platforms to facilitate “social emotional learning” to help students with the added stresses of COVID lockdown. The author of the Google Keyword article, Alicia Salmeron, who is a member of the Google for Education Team, encourages teachers to utilize Google’s G Suite for Education (GSFE) to “[c]reate emotional check-in opportunities” by
[u]s[ing] Google Forms to reach out to students with an emotional-health questionnaire … The responses, which are collected in a Google Sheet, can guide teachers in identifying which students need more support. Encouraging students to write out their emotions is a good tool for allowing students to become self-aware about what they’re feeling and why … Teachers can use Google Classroom to send wellness reminders to students—everything from a quick message like “Take a quick movement break!” to sharing a mindfulness activity from YouTube.
With the help of InnovatEDU’s BigQuery partnership, all student socioemotional data recorded on Google’s GSFE platforms can be aggregated and data-mined to improve “personalized” SEL lessons that are aligned with standardized SEL “competencies” regimented by the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL), which is endorsed by Google.
It should be noted here that GSFE, formerly known as Google Apps for Education (GAFE), was sued by University of California-Berkley students, along with hundreds of class-action litigants from twenty-one other states, because GAFE allegedly excavated their student emails to extract data for noneducational market R&D. Education Week reports that,
[i]n 2014, during a federal class-action lawsuit that was ultimately settled, Google acknowledged to Education Week that it inappropriately ‘scanned and indexed’ the email messages of millions of students using the service. Google officials say the company has since stopped that practice.” Nonetheless, Google’s GSFE has also come under fire from another lawsuit filed by former Mississippi State Attorney General, Jim Hood, who publicly stated that, “[t]hrough this lawsuit, we want to know the extent of Google’s data mining and marketing of student information to third parties . . . I don’t think there could be any motivation other than greed for a company to deliberately keep secret how it collects and uses student information.
With so many lawsuits filed against Google for its illegal data-mining of GAFE/GSFE apps, how will InnovateEDU’s partnership with BigQuery be used to ramp up Google’s dragnet practices of tracking and selling student data, including socioemotional-learning metrics, to third parties?
In the meantime, during the COVID lockdown, the Gates Foundation has issued a $213,640 grant to the Fund for the City of New York “to support research around the relationship between growth in SEL competencies and growth in academic outcomes.” This Gates grant bankrolls the City of New York to finance competency-based SEL, which is streamlined by Google through the use of GSFE apps that are data-mined by BigQuery linked to the New York-based InnovateEDU, which is funded by the Gates Foundation.
From inBloom to Learnsphere to BigQuery . . . from Big Data to Big Brother
This BigQuery datahub, which compiles InnovateEDU’s Google Classroom data into a single digital platform, is essentially akin to the Learnsphere database that is modeled after the defunct inBloom data-cloud. In my book, School World Order: The Technocratic Globalization of Corporatized Education, I document how Learnsphere, like its inBloom predecessor, is a massive public-private repository that aggregates data, such as students’ cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional “learning analytics,” from schools across the globe in order to build better e-learning products through “machine learning” and “deep learning” algorithms engineered for the purposes of evolving artificial intelligence for ed-tech.
Originally called the Shared Learning Collaborative, inBloom was created with funding from the Gates Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation of New York, both of which are currently financing InnovateEDU. From 2011 to 2014, inBloom partnered with the New York City School District to tabulate copious student data through an operating system from the NewsCorp subsidiary Wireless Generation, which then aggregated these student data in a web cloud managed by the Amazon Corporation, which has also built a similar web-based computing cloud that streamlines data dossiers for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
In 2014, after fighting against testimony from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), and after battling a lawsuit filed with the New York State Supreme Court, inBloom caved in to mounting public backlash against its third-party data-sharing practices as it terminated all of its contracts and shut down all operations.
Picking up where inBloom left off, a $5 million grant from the federal government through the National Science Foundation was dispersed to Carnegie Mellon University for the purposes of launching Learnsphere, a not-for-profit “distributed” repository for digitally sharing student data with third parties including for-profit vendors. Learnsphere’s “distributed infrastructure” consists of several interconnected datahubs, including an “ASSISTments data repository [that] contains datasets from secondary school interactions with an online tutoring system, in many cases as part of online experiments of what learning works best.”
In addition, Learnsphere data-miners can utilize
[t]he Educational Data Mining Workbench [which] support[s] learning scientists to perform a number of analytic tasks including 1) define and modify behavior categories of interest (e.g., gaming, unresponsiveness, off-task conversation, help avoidance), 2) label previously collected educational log data with the categories of interest, 3) validate inter-rater reliability between multiple labelers of the same educational log data corpus, and 4) provide support for running the labeled data through a machine-learning tool, such as WEKA or RapidMine.
To simplify, Learnsphere’s “Data Mining Workbench” aggregates student data so that “learning scientists” can evolve AI ed-tech through a “machine-learning tool” that scans “learning analytics” from “behavior categories,” such as cognitive-behavioral stimulus-response algorithms and socioemotional-biofeedback algorithms that track “unresponsiveness, off-task conversation, help avoidance,” etc.
According to Learnsphere’s LearnLab DataShops, the “learning scientists” who are eligible to access Learnsphere’s digital edu-conditioning databanks include “Educational data miner[s],” such as “Computer scientist[s], Psychometrician[s], [and] Learning analytics researcher[s]”; “Course developer[s] [and] Educational technology researcher[s],” such as “ITS/AIED researcher[s] [and] User modeling researcher[s]”; and “Psychologist[s],” such as “Cognitive scientist[s] [and] Educational psychologist[s].”
In brief, Learnsphere’s distributed databases are collated so that “learning engineers” can synthesize massive pools of students’ psychological data for the purposes of evolving adaptive-learning and SEL-biofeedback algorithms to build artificial intelligence for ed-tech.
Like Learnsphere and inBloom, InnovateEDU’s BigQuery partnership is a similar Big Data project geared to streamline and accelerate the evolution of socioemotional-biofeedback and cognitive-behavioral adaptive-learning algorithms for the purposes of progressively engineering “learning analytics” delivered through “post-human” artificial intelligence designed by Big Tech companies that partner with Big Government to manage a techno-fascist planned economy. It should be noted here that the Gates-funded InnovateEDU is also financed by the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation, the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation, the Silicon Valley Family Foundation, the New York Community Trust, and the New York City Department of Youth and Community Development.
In addition, the Co-Founder and Executive Director of InnovateEDU, Erin Mote, has
work[ed] with Intel, Cisco, Google and HP. Erin has served in an advisory capacity to the White House/OSTP’s US Ignite Initiative, the President’s Global Development Innovation Policy, the State Department’s TechCamp program, and the Obama Administration’s intra-agency process for Rio 2.0 and Rio+20. Erin served as the founding Chief of Party for the USAID Global Broadband and Innovations Alliance – a $19.5 million global technology expansion project.
It should also be noted that Mote “leads the development of Cortex, a next generation learning platform, student information system, and formative assessment engine that supports personalized learning.” Mote’s colleague, Nicolle Beneventano, is InnovateEDU’s Project Manager for Cortex, which shares its own “Ed-Fi operational data store (ODS)” with Learnsphere’s Big Data repository.
In sum, between BigQuery and Cortex, InnovateEDU’s “reimagine” data-mining partnerships are expanding upon Learnsphere’s “distributed infrastructure” of Big Data analytics designed to evolve post-human AI ed-tech.
“Disrupting” Class with “Creative Destruction”
The Gates Foundation’s Reimagine Education initiative is part of its larger “Disaster Capitalist” mission to exploit COVID lockdown as an opportunity for “Creative Destruction” that will ram through the mass-institutionalization of “disruptive technologies” which “destroy” the tradition of human teachers in brick-and-mortar schoolrooms in order to “create” a new public-private industry of learning analytics engineered by communitarian partnerships between Big Tech and Big Government.
The partnership between Google and the Gates-financed InnovateEDU is a prime example of how the Reimagine Education campaign is fueled by a “Disaster Capitalist” stratagem to capitalize on Joseph Schumpeter’s economic principle of “Creative Destruction” by heavily subsidizing “disruptive” ed-tech that digitally automates school lessons through virtual classrooms which facilitate COVID “distance learning” by replacing human teachers and brick-and-mortar schoolhouses while the latter are forced to shut down due to COVID lockdown. According to InnovateEDU’s company website, “InnovateEDU is committed to massively disrupting [my emphasis] K-12 public education by focusing on the development of scalable tools and practices that leverage innovation, technology [my emphasis], and new human capital systems to improve education for all students and close the achievement gap.”
By advancing “technology” to “massively disrupt . . . education” for the purposes of “leverag[ing] innovation,” InnovateEDU is explicitly proclaiming its commitment to Schumpeter’s “Creative Destruction” economics. And by exploiting the “Shock Doctrine” of COVID lockdown as an opportunity to partner with Google and the Gates Foundation to massively expand Big Data-mining through BigQuery, InnovateEDU is clearly exploiting “Disaster Capitalist” schemes to “Build Back Better” by enhancing its “creative disruption” of traditional schooling with technocratic AI learning analytics.
In brief, through partnerships with BigQuery and Cortex, the Gates-financed InnovateEDU is fulfilling its “reimagination” of education by expanding ed-tech data-tracking that “massively disrupts” traditional schooling by streamlining massive pools of cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional learning analytics to improve AI algorithms which will “destroy” traditional teacher feedback as new automated instructional algorithms are “created” to “disrupt” human teacher feedback with digital stimulus-response feedback programmed to condition students for workforce “competence” in a techno-fascist planned economy managed by “human capital systems.”
In alignment with the Gates Foundation’s “disruptive tech” partnership with InnovateEDU, the Gates philanthropy has paid out $1,375,414 to the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation, which declares itself “a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank dedicated to improving the world through Disruptive Innovation … [T]he Institute offers a unique framework for understanding many of society’s most pressing issues including education, healthcare, and economic prosperity.”
In the fields of “K-12 Education” and “Higher Education,” the Clayton Christensen thinktank promotes advancements in “disruptive” ed-tech “Software and Hardware” (including “adaptive learning” courseware and other “artificial intelligence” programs). The thinktank also advocates for “disruptive innovation” in K-12 and higher education through partnerships with “For-Profit Providers” on the cutting edge of “Data & Assessment,” “Personalized and Blended Learning,” “Social-Emotional Learning (SEL),” “Social Capital,” “Competency-Based Learning,” and “Workforce Readiness.”
On May 27th during the COVID lockdown, three weeks after the announcement of the Gates-Schmidt-Cuomo collaboration to Reimagine Education, the Gates Foundation issued a special $294,914 grant to the Institute for Disruptive Innovation for the purposes of “understand[ing] what motivates districts to adopt continuous improvement practices to improve outcomes that are predictive of post-secondary success.”
To sum up, the Gates Foundation’s partnerships with InnovateEDU and the Institute for Disruptive Innovation are illustrative of the Gates’ philanthropy’s broader “Disaster Capitalist” enterprise, which is stage-managing the “Creative Destruction” of the old schooling system in order to usher in a new techno-fascist system of AI edu-conditioning that Naomi Klein calls a “Screen New Deal.” Built on “surveillance capitalism,” what Klein labels as the “Screen New Deal” is nothing less than the next phase of Project BEST as the Gates Foundation bankrolls Reimagine Education partnerships with Big Tech corporations that deploy “disruptive technologies” for tracking students’ learning analytics into psychological profiles which rank the students’ cognitive-behavioral and socio-emotional “competence” algorithms into “Social Credit Scores” that determine their job placement in a digital workforce caste system.
Reimagine a Global “Screen New Deal”: Build Back a Better “School World Order”
The Gates Foundation’s Screen New Deal is not limited to the Reimagine Education initiative in the State of New York. Indeed, the Gates Foundation’s “Reimagine” campaign is being mirrored by the US Department of Education, which has issued a national “Reimagine Workforce Preparation” competition that awards CARES stimulus money to schools applying for grants that pay for new “career pathways” curriculums facilitated by adaptive learning courseware and other virtual e-learning management systems online. Expanding the Screen New Deal agenda beyond the USA, the Gates Foundation has dumped out over a quarter billion dollars in grants to “Reimagine” educational institutions across the globe.
During the COVID-lockdown months from March 1st through June 2nd, the Gates Foundation poured out at least 203 grants totaling no less than $228,261,262 to “Reimagine” education systems across the globe. These Gates grants financed corporate charter schools, public-private community schools, virtual/online edu-corporations, ed-tech companies, socioemotional-learning non-profits and universities on basically every continent. Altogether, these combined grants set up public-private ed-tech infrastructures for “social distance” learning networks to be AI data-mined by Chinese-style “Social Credit” algorithms which score students’ cognitive-behavioral, socio-emotional, and biological health metrics to determine the students’ access to education, employment, healthcare, housing, transportation, and even due process.
Post-Human AI Ed-Tech: More than 10% of this quarter billion dollars was allocated “for the advancement of post-human education through the technocratic digitalization of teaching and learning. Specifically, $29,639,942 was assigned to pay for improvements in “internet connectivity,” “ed-tech,” “instructional systems,” “virtual instruction,” “virtual tutoring,” “simulations,” “artificial intelligence,” “machine learning,” and other digital “tools” and “computer” platforms to provide “distance learning” and “blended learning” that utilize “data” and “algorithms” to enable “self-directed learning” and “personalize[d] learning” for “competency-based education.”
More than 10% of this quarter billion dollars was allocated “for the advancement of post-human education through the technocratic digitalization of teaching and learning. Specifically, $29,639,942 was assigned to pay for improvements in “internet connectivity,” “ed-tech,” “instructional systems,” “virtual instruction,” “virtual tutoring,” “simulations,” “artificial intelligence,” “machine learning,” and other digital “tools” and “computer” platforms to provide “distance learning” and “blended learning” that utilize “data” and “algorithms” to enable “self-directed learning” and “personalize[d] learning” for “competency-based education.” Corporate-Fascist Workforce Planning: Another 9.8% ($22,523,954) has been allotted to finance the corporatization of education through public-private charter schools, including virtual charter schools and other “school choice” programs, including “workforce development” and “economic planning” projects, such as “career pathways,” “cradle-to-career,” and other “school-to-work” initiatives for “lifelong learning.”
Another 9.8% ($22,523,954) has been allotted to finance the corporatization of education through public-private charter schools, including virtual charter schools and other “school choice” programs, including “workforce development” and “economic planning” projects, such as “career pathways,” “cradle-to-career,” and other “school-to-work” initiatives for “lifelong learning.” COVID Tech Upgrades for “Distance Learning” and “Contact Tracing”: Another 24% ($56,404,599) is issued specifically for COVID expenses, including technology infrastructure upgrades to facilitate “distance learning” and other “social distancing” procedures along with COVID “surveillance” for testing, tracking, and treatment. It should be noted that an additional $119,284,137 (52%) are disseminated to “Global Health” projects at universities, such as “human organ chip” research and “vaccine” studies between Zheijiang University of China and GAVI (the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations), which partners with Microsoft at the ID2020 Global Biometric Identification project: an international thinktank that promotes an Orwellian version of blockchain technologies to “microchip” the whole planet.
With more than a quarter billion dollars dumped into a hi-tech concoction of post-human AI ed-tech that tracks psychometric and biometric data for workforce placement and contact tracing of COVID-19, it is evident that the Gates Foundation’s technocratic stratagem to “Reimagine” global education is aiming to “Build Back Better” by setting up a global surveillance grid that institutes a worldwide system of dystopian “Social Credit,” which will utilize the “internet of things” to data-mine students’ digital psychological profiles in order to virtually dictate whether they get access to schools, jobs, hospitals, housing, transportation, and even due process.
Welcome to the School World Order.
John Klyczek has an MA in English and has taught college rhetoric and research argumentation for over eight years. His literary scholarship concentrates on the history of global eugenics and Aldous Huxley’s dystopic novel, Brave New World. He is the author of School World Order: The Technocratic Globalization of Corporatized Education (TrineDay Books); and he is a contributor to the Centre for Research on Globalization, OpEdNews, the Intrepid Report, the Dissident Voice, Blacklisted News, Activist Post, News With Views, The Saker, Rense News, David Icke News, Natural News, and the SGT Report. He is also the Director of Writing and Editing at Black Freighter Productions (BFP) Books. His website is schoolworldorder.info.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-08-28--New Law OKs “Removal of Children” – South Australian Laws Greenlight Massive State Oppression

COVID-19 has been the perfect excuse for governments around the world to implement tyrannical new laws , and South Australia @ @ @ @ @ state oppression .

COVID-19 has been the perfect excuse for governments around the world to implement tyrannical new laws, and South Australia is at the forefront of state oppression.


renegadetribune--2020-08-28--Who Were Kyle Rittenhouse’s Three Shooting Victims In Kenosha, WI?

The latest US destruction and carnage that centered in Kenosha , Wisconsin after the police shooting of Jacob Blake is the current story taking up all the headlines .
Renegade Tribune has covered this story in its detailed article “ Civil War Spreading : Streets of Kenosha , Wisconsin Turn Into Battlefield.
” One of the main stories coming out of this chaos is about the three shootings by 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse .
While I do not defend Rittenhouse ’ s actions for putting himself into this situation , it is easy to see that the Jewish media will use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abuses against all White people , branding all White people with the terms vigilantism , domestic terrorism , etc.
, while at the same time defending the indefensible actions of the rioters and looters .
Here is what is currently being reported about Kyle Rittenhouse from an INSIDER article : Kyle Rittenhouse , 17 , was arrested Wednesday in connection with the shooting of three people — two of whom have died — during protests in Kenosha , Wisconsin , on Tuesday night , The New York Times and USA Today reported .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and is said to have crossed state lines to stand guard outside businesses during unrest stemming from the police shooting of Jacob Blake days earlier .
He was taken into custody and will be charged with first-degree intentional homicide , USA Today ’ s Nick Penzenstadler tweeted .
Of course to stir up even more trouble the Jewish media is reporting that looking at Rittenhouse ’ s facebook posts he was shown to be obsessed with Blue Lives Matter and that he appeared “ on edge ” before shots rang out .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ down and attacked by a bunch of rioting thugs you might be on edge too .
It so fits their narrative to report that he was obsessed with Blue Lives Matter .
Next they will be reporting that they ’ ve uncovered his written manifesto .
But what about his three “ innocent ” victims , two who were killed and the third maimed .
Who were these “ martyrs ” for the cause of BLM ?
We learn about the first victim , who died from being shot in the head , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Joseph Rosenbaum was reported by local media to have been one of the two men killed in the Tuesday shooting initiated by teenager Kyle Rittenhouse during protests in Kenosha .
Rosenbaum was identified as a registered sex offender , convicted in Arizona for “ sexual conduct with a minor ” , according to Wisconsin sex offender registry .
The next of Rittenhouse ’ s shooting victims who died from his wound was Anthony Huber .
He is now being painted as just a wonderful partner , father and semi-pro skateboarder .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help Rittenhouse and not trying to bash Rittenhouse ’ s head in with his skateboard .
See the following from a heavy article : Here are some other photos of Anthony Huber from the Wisconsin Department of Corrections : And here is his arrest record : And what about Rittenhouse ’ s third shooting victim who practically had one of his arms shot off ?
This comes from a RedState article : Finally , we have Gaige “ Lefty ” Grosskreutz .
Grosskreutz has a pistol in his hand during the confrontation and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he was LARPing as a medic .
He was a convicted felon ( burglary ) — some of the terror sympathizers are claiming his convictions for burglary was merely a misdemeanor , but that remains to be seen — and is not allowed to possess any weapon but appears to have been carrying a concealed semiautomatic pistol .
He ’ s also a member of the anarchist group “ People ’ s Revolution Movement.
” Here ’ s another question .
What was Grosskreutz carrying in those packs on his front and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m sure it was just “ medical supplies ” for his LARPing gig .
I guess he ’ s really earned his moniker “ Lefty ” from now on .
There is a lot of the stink of a government psyop around this whole event .
It would be interesting to know if one or all of these felons were part of the early release programs foisted upon the public by the ZOG politicians during the “ plandemic.
” It ’ s easy to see that both the riots and the “ plandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same plan for a Jewish globalist takeover .
Nevertheless , we all should take this as a warning and be prepared .
Groups of felons and gang members are most likely now gathering together as part of these riots masquerading as “ peaceful protests.
” If this is not stopped , groups of these violent criminals will continue to grow , form up as a pseudo guerrilla army and begin to fan out into the suburban and rural areas .
Now and in the long run they will continue to be covertly funded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overwhelm the ignorant and unprepared populace .
These are not antifa soy-boys and they definitely were not black .

The latest US destruction and carnage that centered in Kenosha, Wisconsin after the police shooting of Jacob Blake is the current story taking up all the headlines. Renegade Tribune has covered this story in its detailed article “Civil War Spreading: Streets of Kenosha, Wisconsin Turn Into Battlefield.” One of the main stories coming out of this chaos is about the three shootings by 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse. While I do not defend Rittenhouse’s actions for putting himself into this situation, it is easy to see that the Jewish media will use him and his actions to perpetrate further abuses against all White people, branding all White people with the terms vigilantism, domestic terrorism, etc., while at the same time defending the indefensible actions of the rioters and looters.
Here is what is currently being reported about Kyle Rittenhouse from an INSIDER article:
Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was arrested Wednesday in connection with the shooting of three people — two of whom have died — during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Tuesday night, The New York Times and USA Today reported. The teenager is from Antioch, Illinois, and is said to have crossed state lines to stand guard outside businesses during unrest stemming from the police shooting of Jacob Blake days earlier. He was taken into custody and will be charged with first-degree intentional homicide, USA Today’s Nick Penzenstadler tweeted.
Of course to stir up even more trouble the Jewish media is reporting that looking at Rittenhouse’s facebook posts he was shown to be obsessed with Blue Lives Matter and that he appeared “on edge” before shots rang out. Yes, if you were being chased down and attacked by a bunch of rioting thugs you might be on edge too. It so fits their narrative to report that he was obsessed with Blue Lives Matter. Next they will be reporting that they’ve uncovered his written manifesto.
But what about his three “innocent” victims, two who were killed and the third maimed. Who were these “martyrs” for the cause of BLM?
We learn about the first victim, who died from being shot in the head, from an RT article.
One of the men killed in the shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin was identified by online journalists as a convicted child molester. A video from the night of the incident shows him provoking someone to shoot him.
The 36-year-old Joseph Rosenbaum was reported by local media to have been one of the two men killed in the Tuesday shooting initiated by teenager Kyle Rittenhouse during protests in Kenosha. Rosenbaum was identified as a registered sex offender, convicted in Arizona for “sexual conduct with a minor”, according to Wisconsin sex offender registry. The next of Rittenhouse’s shooting victims who died from his wound was Anthony Huber. He is now being painted as just a wonderful partner, father and semi-pro skateboarder. I’m sure he was just trying to help Rittenhouse and not trying to bash Rittenhouse’s head in with his skateboard. See the following from a heavy article: Here are some other photos of Anthony Huber from the Wisconsin Department of Corrections: And here is his arrest record: And what about Rittenhouse’s third shooting victim who practically had one of his arms shot off? This comes from a RedState article: Finally, we have Gaige “Lefty” Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz has a pistol in his hand during the confrontation and was shot in the arm. Ironically, he was LARPing as a medic. He was a convicted felon (burglary) — some of the terror sympathizers are claiming his convictions for burglary was merely a misdemeanor, but that remains to be seen — and is not allowed to possess any weapon but appears to have been carrying a concealed semiautomatic pistol. He’s also a member of the anarchist group “People’s Revolution Movement.” Such a sweet guy. Here’s another question. What was Grosskreutz carrying in those packs on his front and back? Oh yes, I’m sure it was just “medical supplies” for his LARPing gig. I guess he’s really earned his moniker “Lefty” from now on. There is a lot of the stink of a government psyop around this whole event. It would be interesting to know if one or all of these felons were part of the early release programs foisted upon the public by the ZOG politicians during the “plandemic.” It’s easy to see that both the riots and the “plandemic” are just two parts of the same plan for a Jewish globalist takeover. Nevertheless, we all should take this as a warning and be prepared. Groups of felons and gang members are most likely now gathering together as part of these riots masquerading as “peaceful protests.” If this is not stopped, groups of these violent criminals will continue to grow, form up as a pseudo guerrilla army and begin to fan out into the suburban and rural areas. Now and in the long run they will continue to be covertly funded and provided military weaponry in order to overwhelm the ignorant and unprepared populace. These are not antifa soy-boys and they definitely were not black.
Share now!


renegadetribune--2020-08-27--First Gassing at Auschwitz: Rebuttal to Joachim Neander

Joachim Neander claims that he is able to give the name of two prisoners who were gassed at Auschwitz .
He notes that the “ Bunkerbuch ” on 5 September 1941 has recorded the death of three detainees , Fritz Renner , Bruno Grosman and Roman Drost , of which the first two are Germans .
Since « they all died the same day when the first mass gassing was carried out in the basement of Block 11 ( date Sep 5 , 1941 , according to reports that , shortly after the event , reached the Polish Government-in-Exile in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were gassed .
He adds that « Carlo Mattogno does neither take into consideration the “ Bunker ” ledger nor the Rögner report nor the accounts of the Polish prisoners who were involved in the September 5 , 1941 , “ action ” » .
[ 1 ] « For the scientific historian , the testimony is not really history , but an object of history .
A testimony does not have much weight , and weighs still less if not confirmed by a genuine document .
The postulate of historical science thus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no document ( s ) , no verified fact.
» [ 2 ] A testimony , if not supported by a document , is worthless from the historical point of view , regardless of the notion of “ converging testimonies ” , as is shown by the example of the “ converging ” testimonial evidence for the Auschwitz 4 million victim figure .
However , in this case , as I have demonstrated in my study Auschwitz : The First Gassing .
Rumor and Reality the testimonies are not only not supported by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contradictory on all essential points , namely : • None on the location of the first gassing , • None on the duration of the first gassing , • None on the date of the first gassing , • None on the hour of the first gassing , • None on the preparations for the first gassing , • None on the physician present at the first gassing , • None on the perpetrator of the first gassing , • None on the nature of the victims of the first gassing , • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the first gassing , • None on the persons who removed the corpses , • None on the beginning of the removal of the corpses , • None on the duration of the removal of the corpses , • None on the fate of the corpses removed , • None on the technique of the gassing , • None on the duration of the agony of the victims , • None on the number of Zyklon B cans used for the gassing .
[ 3 ] The interpretation made by Joachim Neander @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 ) He arbitrarily chooses the date September 5 , 1941 among the various contradictory dates given by the self-styled “ eyewitnesses ” : Others – Henry Storch : spring of 1941 ; Maximilian Grabner : beginning of 1941 ; Hans Aumeier : November or December 1942 .
Among these datings he chooses the one mentioned in « reports that , shortly after the event , reached the Polish Government-in-Exile in London » and which were published in the Polish Forthnightly Review on 1 July 1942 .
But why should this date be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Czech , in her Kalendarium , has explicitly stated 3 September 1941 as the starting date of the alleged gassings .
Why is this date unreliable according to Joachim Neander ?
The answer to this is simple and brings us to the second reason .
2 ) It is true that these three prisoners were listed as dead in the “ Bunkerbuch ” on 5 September 1941 , but it is also true that they were locked up there the same day .
Now , according to Danuta Czech , the “ first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ended the day after that with the death of all the victims ; on 5 September there was thus no “ gassing ” but only an evacuation of the bodies .
Neander knows the Kalendarium , since he drew from it ( the entry for 6 September 1941 ) the information regarding the three prisoners confined in the Bunker .
[ 4 ] In addition , his statement that « Carlo Mattogno does neither take into consideration the “ Bunker ” ledger » is false , since I have written on the matter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not provide us with any information regarding the alleged homicidal gassing of September 3-5 , 1941 .
On September 5 , three detainees are registered as having entered : Fritz Renner ( ID 11179 ) , Bruno Grosmann ( ID 15083 ) , and Roman Drost ( ID 10992 ) .
They die on the same day ( in the register of the Bunker , next to their names , there is the note “ ver.
” [ storben ] = deceased ) .
On September 5 , the civilian Ladisław Maślak , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10 , is also entered as having died .
The cause of death is not indicated for these four detainees » .
[ 5 ] In this context Adolf Rögner ’ s statement that « in the prison , there were still 2 Germans , they were not released … The 1st Camp Physician had told them they would be released early if they agreed to participate in a short treatment » .
has no value .
It can not refer to the two German prisoners mentioned above , because they entered the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1941 and died there the same day – what sense does it then make that « there were still 2 Germans , they were not released » ?
Moreover , in the brief quote made by Neander , Rögner does not indicate the names of the detainees nor the date .
He therefore does not have any indication that it refers to Fritz Renner and Bruno Grosman in relation to 5 September 1941 .
Equally untrue is the statement that I did not mention « the accounts of the Polish prisoners who were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ action ” » .
In this regard I have gathered , from all available sources , over forty such accounts , a number vastly superior to that given by Danuta Czech .
[ 6 ] • None there is no evidence that the 11 in Auschwitz was ever used for a homicidal gassing ; • None the dating 5 September 1941 for the alleged event is merely one of the conflicting dates provided by the witness accounts ; therefore the deaths of Fritz Renner and Bruno Grosman in the Bunker on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anything and the two can not be considered as “ gassed .
”

By Carlo Mattogno
Published: 2010-02-08
Joachim Neander claims that he is able to give the name of two prisoners who were gassed at Auschwitz. He notes that the “Bunkerbuch” on 5 September 1941 has recorded the death of three detainees, Fritz Renner, Bruno Grosman and Roman Drost, of which the first two are Germans. Since «they all died the same day when the first mass gassing was carried out in the basement of Block 11 (date Sep 5, 1941, according to reports that, shortly after the event, reached the Polish Government-in-Exile in London)» this shows that they were gassed. He adds that «Carlo Mattogno does neither take into consideration the “Bunker” ledger nor the Rögner report nor the accounts of the Polish prisoners who were involved in the September 5, 1941, “action”».[1]
The French historian Jacques Baynac has written:
«For the scientific historian, the testimony is not really history, but an object of history. A testimony does not have much weight, and weighs still less if not confirmed by a genuine document. The postulate of historical science thus is, to put it bluntly: no document(s), no verified fact.»[2]
A testimony, if not supported by a document, is worthless from the historical point of view, regardless of the notion of “converging testimonies”, as is shown by the example of the “converging” testimonial evidence for the Auschwitz 4 million victim figure.
However, in this case, as I have demonstrated in my study Auschwitz: The First Gassing. Rumor and Reality the testimonies are not only not supported by any documents, but all are moreover contradictory on all essential points, namely:
on the location of the first gassing,
on the duration of the first gassing,
on the date of the first gassing,
on the hour of the first gassing,
on the preparations for the first gassing,
on the physician present at the first gassing,
on the perpetrator of the first gassing,
on the nature of the victims of the first gassing,
on the number of the victims of the first gassing,
on the persons who removed the corpses,
on the beginning of the removal of the corpses,
on the duration of the removal of the corpses,
on the fate of the corpses removed,
on the technique of the gassing,
on the duration of the agony of the victims,
on the number of Zyklon B cans used for the gassing.[3]
The interpretation made by Joachim Neander is completely unfounded for two reasons:
1) He arbitrarily chooses the date September 5, 1941 among the various contradictory dates given by the self-styled “eyewitnesses”:
Michał Kula: 14-15 August 1941
Zbigniew Baranowski: 15 August 1941
Walter Petzold: 9 October 1941;
Others – Henry Storch: spring of 1941; Maximilian Grabner: beginning of 1941; Hans Aumeier: November or December 1942.
Among these datings he chooses the one mentioned in «reports that, shortly after the event, reached the Polish Government-in-Exile in London» and which were published in the Polish Forthnightly Review on 1 July 1942. But why should this date be more reliable than the others? Danuta Czech, in her Kalendarium, has explicitly stated 3 September 1941 as the starting date of the alleged gassings. Why is this date unreliable according to Joachim Neander? The answer to this is simple and brings us to the second reason.
2) It is true that these three prisoners were listed as dead in the “Bunkerbuch” on 5 September 1941, but it is also true that they were locked up there the same day. Now, according to Danuta Czech, the “first gassing” began on 3 September and ended the day after that with the death of all the victims; on 5 September there was thus no “gassing” but only an evacuation of the bodies. Neander knows the Kalendarium, since he drew from it (the entry for 6 September 1941) the information regarding the three prisoners confined in the Bunker.[4] In addition, his statement that «Carlo Mattogno does neither take into consideration the “Bunker” ledger» is false, since I have written on the matter:
«The “Bunkerbuch” does not provide us with any information regarding the alleged homicidal gassing of September 3-5, 1941. On September 5, three detainees are registered as having entered: Fritz Renner (ID 11179), Bruno Grosmann (ID 15083), and Roman Drost (ID 10992). They die on the same day (in the register of the Bunker, next to their names, there is the note “ver.”[storben] = deceased). On September 5, the civilian Ladisław Maślak, who had entered the Bunker on August 10, is also entered as having died. The cause of death is not indicated for these four detainees».[5]
In this context Adolf Rögner’s statement that
«in the prison, there were still 2 Germans, they were not released … The 1st Camp Physician had told them they would be released early if they agreed to participate in a short treatment».
has no value. It can not refer to the two German prisoners mentioned above, because they entered the Bunker of Block 11 on 5 September 1941 and died there the same day – what sense does it then make that «there were still 2 Germans, they were not released»? Moreover, in the brief quote made by Neander, Rögner does not indicate the names of the detainees nor the date. He therefore does not have any indication that it refers to Fritz Renner and Bruno Grosman in relation to 5 September 1941.
Equally untrue is the statement that I did not mention «the accounts of the Polish prisoners who were involved in the September 5, 1941, “action”». In this regard I have gathered, from all available sources, over forty such accounts, a number vastly superior to that given by Danuta Czech.[6]
In conclusion:
there is no evidence that the Bunker of Block 11 in Auschwitz was ever used for a homicidal gassing;
the dating 5 September 1941 for the alleged event is merely one of the conflicting dates provided by the witness accounts;
therefore the deaths of Fritz Renner and Bruno Grosman in the Bunker on September 5, 1941 does not prove anything and the two can not be considered as “gassed.”
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-08-28--First Gassing at Auschwitz: Rebuttal to Joachim Neander


Hera

By Jane Harrison From Myths of Greece and Rome [ 1928 ] We pass to Hera , wife of Zeus .
At first Hera seems all wife , the great typical bride , and the sacred marriage of Zeus and Hera seems the prototype of human wedlock .
So Homer , no doubt , intended us to think , but , if this is really the case what means the ceaseless , turbulent , hostility between Zeus and Hera , the unending , unseemly strife between the Father of gods and men and the woman whom he can not even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mistress really made by the Greek housewife even of the Homeric days in her own image ?
Moreover , at Olympia , where , in historic days , Zeus ruled supreme , Hera had her ancient separate sanctuary , the Heraion , the building of which long predated that of Zeus .
At Argos , too , there was an ancient Heraion sacred to the ox-eyed goddess .
In Thessaly , in the ancient Argonautic legend , Hera is queen and patron of the hero Jason .
Of Zeus we hear nothing .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ answer is clear enough : Hera has been forcibly married , she is an ancient Pelasgian divinity , and when Zeus , the god of the immigrant Achaians , conquers her land , he marries the native princess .
But she is never really subject to him .
She leaves a wife ’ s submission to the shadowy double of Zeus , Dione .
In a word , the unseemly squabblings between Zeus and Hera are the outcome , not of conjugal jealousy , but of racial rivalry .
Hera remains always the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but never really subdued by the alien conqueror .
Hera , then , was Queen in Greece long before the coming of the Achaian Zeus .
In those early Pelasgian days , who and what was she ?
Her name tells us .
Hera is Yār-a , the year .
Hera is the spirit of the year , the daimon who brings the fruits of the year in their season .
As such she has a threefold seasonal aspect .
As Stymphalos , in remote Arcadia , Pausanias tells us , Hera had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet a girl she was called Child or Maiden , when married she was called Fullgrown , and , separated from her husband , she was called Chera , the desolate one , the Widow .
She reflects , then , the three stages of a woman ’ s life , but she reflects also the three seasons , for in antiquity the seasons were three , not four : spring , summer , winter ; summer and autumn being regarded together as one season of fruit bearing .
In the spring she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and autumn she is Fullgrown , and in winter she is a Widow .
Her winter desolation reminds us of the mourning of Demeter .
This three-seasoned year is dependent on the earlier moon calendar , with its waxing , full , and waning moon .
Of all this nature-aspect of Hera as goddess of the seasons there is in Homer little trace , she has become wholly a human queen .
Once only , and that in very beautiful fashion , does the old nature-aspect break through .
Zeus the Cloud-gatherer is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ida , and Hera , clad in all her splendour and girt with the cestus of Aphrodite , approaches him .
“ And as he saw her , love come over his deep heart.
” He cast about her a great golden cloud and clasped her as his bride within his arms .
“ And beneath them the divine earth sent forth fresh , new grass , and dewy lotus and crocus and hyacinth , thick and soft that raised them aloft from the ground .
Therein they lay , and were clad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whence fell drops of glittering dew.
” Here manifestly we have the sacred marriage which wakens anew the blossoming earth in a magical spring .
Hebe , it may here be noted , the cup-bearer of Olympus , and the daughter of Hera , is but her younger aspect as maiden .

By Jane Harrison
From Myths of Greece and Rome [1928]
We pass to Hera, wife of Zeus. At first Hera seems all wife, the great typical bride, and the sacred marriage of Zeus and Hera seems the prototype of human wedlock. So Homer, no doubt, intended us to think, but, if this is really the case what means the ceaseless, turbulent, hostility between Zeus and Hera, the unending, unseemly strife between the Father of gods and men and the woman whom he cannot even beat into submission? Is this tyrannous mistress really made by the Greek housewife even of the Homeric days in her own image? Moreover, at Olympia, where, in historic days, Zeus ruled supreme, Hera had her ancient separate sanctuary, the Heraion, the building of which long predated that of Zeus. At Argos, too, there was an ancient Heraion sacred to the ox-eyed goddess. In Thessaly, in the ancient Argonautic legend, Hera is queen and patron of the hero Jason. Of Zeus we hear nothing. What does it all mean? The answer is clear enough: Hera has been forcibly married, she is an ancient Pelasgian divinity, and when Zeus, the god of the immigrant Achaians, conquers her land, he marries the native princess. But she is never really subject to him. She leaves a wife’s submission to the shadowy double of Zeus, Dione. In a word, the unseemly squabblings between Zeus and Hera are the outcome, not of conjugal jealousy, but of racial rivalry. Hera remains always the turbulent, native princess, coerced, but never really subdued by the alien conqueror.
Hera, then, was Queen in Greece long before the coming of the Achaian Zeus. In those early Pelasgian days, who and what was she? Her name tells us. Hera is Yār-a, the year. Hera is the spirit of the year, the daimon who brings the fruits of the year in their season. As such she has a threefold seasonal aspect. As Stymphalos, in remote Arcadia, Pausanias tells us, Hera had three sanctuaries and three surnames. While yet a girl she was called Child or Maiden, when married she was called Fullgrown, and, separated from her husband, she was called Chera, the desolate one, the Widow. She reflects, then, the three stages of a woman’s life, but she reflects also the three seasons, for in antiquity the seasons were three, not four: spring, summer, winter; summer and autumn being regarded together as one season of fruit bearing. In the spring she is Child or Maiden, in summer and autumn she is Fullgrown, and in winter she is a Widow. Her winter desolation reminds us of the mourning of Demeter. This three-seasoned year is dependent on the earlier moon calendar, with its waxing, full, and waning moon.
Of all this nature-aspect of Hera as goddess of the seasons there is in Homer little trace, she has become wholly a human queen. Once only, and that in very beautiful fashion, does the old nature-aspect break through. Zeus the Cloud-gatherer is seated on the topmost peak of Mount Ida, and Hera, clad in all her splendour and girt with the cestus of Aphrodite, approaches him. “And as he saw her, love come over his deep heart.” He cast about her a great golden cloud and clasped her as his bride within his arms. “And beneath them the divine earth sent forth fresh, new grass, and dewy lotus and crocus and hyacinth, thick and soft that raised them aloft from the ground. Therein they lay, and were clad on with a fair golden cloud, whence fell drops of glittering dew.” Here manifestly we have the sacred marriage which wakens anew the blossoming earth in a magical spring. Hebe, it may here be noted, the cup-bearer of Olympus, and the daughter of Hera, is but her younger aspect as maiden.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-08-28--White Family Destroyed as Black Man Brutally Murders Young Woman and Her Step-Father

It appears that a Black man crashed with a car and then proceeded to murder a young White woman and her step-father in cold-blood .
Charles Nicholas Wall , 45 , and Laura Ashley Anderson , 21 were killed , while another person was injured .
This took place in Georgetown , South Carolina .
You won ’ t be seeing the face of the victims next to the face of the killer in most media reports , but you probably won ’ t be seeing about this story at all .
Ty Sheem Ha Sheem Walters III , 23 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in connection to a shooting reported at the intersection of Indian Hut Road and Highmarket Street after 5 p.m. Monday , authorities said .
Kimberly Wall , mother and wife of the victims , wrote : Just imagine if the races were reversed .
There would be social movements and riots .
It would be international news .
Instead it ’ s just another passing local news story , which has become all too common these days .
This is what happens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White lives don ’ t matter to the jewish press and politicians .

It appears that a Black man crashed with a car and then proceeded to murder a young White woman and her step-father in cold-blood. Charles Nicholas Wall, 45, and Laura Ashley Anderson, 21 were killed, while another person was injured. This took place in Georgetown, South Carolina. You won’t be seeing the face of the victims next to the face of the killer in most media reports, but you probably won’t be seeing about this story at all.
According to Georgetown Times:
Ty Sheem Ha Sheem Walters III, 23, of Moncks Corner, is charged with two counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in connection to a shooting reported at the intersection of Indian Hut Road and Highmarket Street after 5 p.m. Monday, authorities said.
Kimberly Wall, mother and wife of the victims, wrote:
I’m devastated. Heartbroken. Confused. Angry. I don’t understand. Who shoots innocent people? Thank you for all the texts, phone calls, and messages. I am overwhelmed. Please know I appreciate the outpouring of love.”
Just imagine if the races were reversed. There would be social movements and riots. It would be international news. Instead it’s just another passing local news story, which has become all too common these days. This is what happens when a people is being genocided.
White lives don’t matter to the jewish press and politicians.
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-08-28--After Hundreds of Thousands Rally Against Pandemic Measures, Berlin Bans Covid Protests

Earlier this we reported on a major protest in Berlin against Covid-19 mandates , which many feel are infringing upon basic civil rights .
Mainstream media reports had the number of participants pegged at around 20,000 , while independent sources said the number was easily over one million , potentially up to 1.3 million .
Furthermore , the mainstream media news coverage of the event went out of the way to demonize and pigeonhole all of the participants as ‘ far-right ’ extremists and such , effectively demonizing them .
Photos and first-hand accounts of the event show people from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coming together to end the lockdown , the Draconian mandates , and get back to work .
Several more protests have been planned ; however , Berlin just decided to ban protests and events which speak out against the CV-19 measures .
In further developments , organizers canceled plans for a large concert with Bryan Adams in Duesseldorf on Sept. 4 , while in Berlin authorities banned several protests planned for the weekend against coronavirus pandemic measures .
Officials said that those protesting would likely have breached rules on social distancing designed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Germany has seen an upswing in new confirmed cases in recent weeks , and the government is considering whether to impose fresh restrictions again .
Authorities in the capital cited a rally against COVID-19 restrictions on Aug. 1 during which participants ignored mask-wearing and distancing rules and other conditions imposed on the protest .
[ Source ] Andreas Geisel , the Berlin interior senator commented on the banning of such protests , and is quoted by Reuters : About 20,000 people , including libertarians , constitutional loyalists , far-right supporters and anti-vaccination activists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Geisel said the organizers of that protest had deliberately broken rules they had previously agreed with police , including wearing masks and maintaining social distancing .
“ Such behaviour is not acceptable .
The state can not be given the runaround , ” he said , adding he did not want Berlin to be a stage for conspiracy theorists and right-wing extremists.
” [ Source ] Again , a leading politician suggests that being opposed to lockdowns and severe Covid measures is not only a political issue , but one only championed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incredibly dangerous in a world that is sliding faster than ever into global tyranny .
Isaac Davis is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com .
He is an outspoken advocate of liberty and of a voluntary society .
He is an avid reader of history and passionate about becoming self-sufficient to break free of the control matrix .
Follow him on Facebook , here .
This article ( After Hundreds of Thousands Rally Against Pandemic Measures , Berlin Bans Covid Protests ) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Isaac Davis and WakingTimes.com .
It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution , author bio , and this copyright statement .

By Isaac Davis
Earlier this we reported on a major protest in Berlin against Covid-19 mandates, which many feel are infringing upon basic civil rights. Mainstream media reports had the number of participants pegged at around 20,000, while independent sources said the number was easily over one million, potentially up to 1.3 million.
Furthermore, the mainstream media news coverage of the event went out of the way to demonize and pigeonhole all of the participants as ‘far-right’ extremists and such, effectively demonizing them. Photos and first-hand accounts of the event show people from all walks of life, however, coming together to end the lockdown, the Draconian mandates, and get back to work.
Several more protests have been planned; however, Berlin just decided to ban protests and events which speak out against the CV-19 measures.
In further developments, organizers canceled plans for a large concert with Bryan Adams in Duesseldorf on Sept. 4, while in Berlin authorities banned several protests planned for the weekend against coronavirus pandemic measures. Officials said that those protesting would likely have breached rules on social distancing designed to stop the spread of the virus. Germany has seen an upswing in new confirmed cases in recent weeks, and the government is considering whether to impose fresh restrictions again. Authorities in the capital cited a rally against COVID-19 restrictions on Aug. 1 during which participants ignored mask-wearing and distancing rules and other conditions imposed on the protest. [Source]
Andreas Geisel, the Berlin interior senator commented on the banning of such protests, and is quoted by Reuters:
About 20,000 people, including libertarians, constitutional loyalists, far-right supporters and anti-vaccination activists, marched in Berlin on Aug. 1. Geisel said the organizers of that protest had deliberately broken rules they had previously agreed with police, including wearing masks and maintaining social distancing. “Such behaviour is not acceptable. The state cannot be given the runaround,” he said, adding he did not want Berlin to be a stage for conspiracy theorists and right-wing extremists.” [Source]
Again, a leading politician suggests that being opposed to lockdowns and severe Covid measures is not only a political issue, but one only championed by ‘extremists.’ Such rhetoric is incredibly dangerous in a world that is sliding faster than ever into global tyranny.
Isaac Davis is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com. He is an outspoken advocate of liberty and of a voluntary society. He is an avid reader of history and passionate about becoming self-sufficient to break free of the control matrix. Follow him on Facebook, here.
This article (After Hundreds of Thousands Rally Against Pandemic Measures, Berlin Bans Covid Protests) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Isaac Davis and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt