renegadetribune--2020-06-16--Study Finds That Sunscreen Ingredients Enters Into Your Blood Stream Every Time You Put It On

Collective Evolution has been creating awareness about the potential dangers of sunscreen since the beginning of 2009 .
When we started to , despite presenting credible peer-reviewed scientific publications and interviews with doctors and scientists , many simply thought this wasn ’ t true .
The idea that our federal health regulatory agencies are really looking out for our health and the idea that we can put absolute trust into these agencies as well as the products that they approve are no longer valid .
Enormous amounts of corruption have been exposed over the past decade , which goes to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on ourselves , utilize our critical thinking , and do our own research instead of allowing government authoritative bodies to do it for us .
Sunscreen , and the entire cosmetics industry for that matter , is a great example of how a lack of oversight exists when it comes to the approval of these products .
How were they ever approved and marketed as safe ?
A new study published Monday in the peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA found that several active ingredients in different sunscreens enter the bloodstream at levels that far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without a government safety inspection .
The study used 4 commercially available sunscreens , which all resulted in plasma concentrations that exceeded the safety levels established by the FDA .
These safety levels themselves should also be questioned , as any amount of toxic chemicals is not really safe in the body , even in trace amounts .
The study also points out that it ’ s questionable that the FDA waved “ some nonclinical toxicology studies for sunscreens.
” Clearly more are needed .
The study concluded that “ the systemic absorption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ further studies to determine the clinical significance of these findings , ” although , strangely , it did mention that the results “ do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen.
” It ’ s odd that the authors would state that , perhaps they did so because it ’ s a study that was conducted by the FDA ?
You would think that “ plasma concentrations ” that exceed safety levels would have the authors urging individuals to seek out less harmful sunscreen products , since these are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The big takeaway here is that , what goes on your skin goes into your skin , and it doesn ’ t take long .
The study mentioned observed chemicals seep into the bloodstream via sunscreen in just 24 hours .
It ’ s interesting how this particular study caught the attention of the mainstream , when numerous studies have shown the same thing .
For example , a study led by researchers at UC Berkeley and Clinica de Salud del Valle Salinas demonstrated how taking even a short break from various cosmetics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ products can lead to a substantial drop in the levels of hormone-disrupting chemicals present within the body .
( source ) After just a three-day trial with the girls using only the lower-chemical products , urine samples showed a significant drop in the level of chemicals in the body .
Methyl and propyl parabens , commonly used as preservatives in cosmetics , dropped 44 % and 45 % , respectively , and metabolites of diethyl phthalate , used often in perfumes , dropped by 27 % , and both triclosan and benzophenone-3 fell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As far back as 2004 , a study conducted at the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Manitoba , Canada , sought to develop a method for quantifying common sunscreen agents .
Results demonstrated a significant penetration of all sunscreen agents into the skin , meaning all of these chemicals are entering multiple tissues within the body .
( source ) What type of chemicals are we talking about ?
Oxybenzone is present in multiple popular sunscreens , for example .
There are multiple studies that have outlined the dangers of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to several ailments .
For example , a study out of the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology from the University of Zurich determined that oxybenzone may also mimic the effects of estrogen in the body and promote the growth of cancer cells .
Prompted by multiple studies , a study out of the Queensland Cancer Fund Laboratories at the Queensland Institute of Medical Research in Australia recognized the significance of systemic absorption of sunscreens .
Researchers discovered that oxybenzone inhibited cell growth and DNA synthesis and retarded cycle progression in the first of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They determined that sunscreen causes mitochondrial stress and changes in drug uptake in certain cell lines .
These are a few of multiple examples , and it ’ s only for one chemical out of the multiple hormone disrupting , harmful chemicals found within sunscreen .
Furthermore , various studies have shown that sunscreen ingredients , like oxybenzone , actually increase the absorption of other harmful chemicals , like herbicides , which we are constantly exposed to as well .
Again , the main point here is that what you put on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you ’ re putting on sunscreen , or make-up , and you read all of the ingredients , all of those ingredients are also entering into your bloodstream .
Are we really supposed to avoid the sun ?
It doesn ’ t seem too natural , as it provides us with an enormous amount of nourishment .
Not just us , but all life on Earth .
Was fear of the sun simply used as a marketing tactic to avoid it and sell these products ?
Sure , sunburns are bad and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure is not bad for you .
We burn because our skin is not used to so much sun exposure , as we now live unnatural lives out of the sun .
When we all of a sudden spend more time outdoors , our skin doesn ’ t have the time to adjust , and so it burns .
If you want to wear sunscreen , the answer is simple : Seek out sunscreen products without harmful chemicals .
Go to a natural health store , do your own research , look online @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and perhaps slowly begin to spend more time outside so your skin adjusts and becomes less prone to burning .
Should we really be spending more time in the sun ?
According to a study published in the Journal of Internal Medicine , the life expectancy of people that avoided sun exposure was reduced by about 2 years compared to those who regularly sun bathed .
The study even pointed out that nonsmokers who stayed out of the sun had a life expectancy similar to smokers who had the highest level of sun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study , the researchers looked at data from 29,518 Swedish women .
The women were 25-64 years of age at the start of the study .
The study was originally designed to evaluate the rate of melanoma , a type of skin cancer , so sun exposure was one of the variables that was being examined .
The results showed that women who regularly sun bathed lived longer because they had a lower rate of death , cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) , and deaths that were not due to cancer or CVD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure .
However , these women did have a higher rate of death due to cancer , which was in part because they lived longer .
Because nonsmokers who avoided sun exposure had a life expectancy similar to smokers in the highest sun exposure group , the researchers concluded that avoidance of sun exposure is a risk factor for death of a similar magnitude as smoking .
This isn ’ t a big surprise , as the sun gives us vitamin D , which plays a huge role in our overall health , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strength , organ function , blood pressure , bone health , and our immune system .
We need sun exposure , and if we are putting on sunscreen every time we are out in the sun as a result of fear propaganda , we are not getting all of those health benefits .
Please understand that this list of important benefits represents a fraction of the many ways in which vitamin D helps optimize your health .
And , although you can obtain vitamin D from natural food sources , experts agree on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the best way to get your vitamin D. The so-called experts who advise you to avoid all sunlight and religiously apply sunscreen are actually encouraging you to increase your risk of cancer , not lower it .
There are so many more studies that back up the information shared in this article .
One study revealed that melanoma patients who had higher levels of sun exposure were less likely to die than other melanoma patients , and patients who already had melanoma and got a lot of sun exposure were prone to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are more prominent causes of skin cancer than the sun ?
An Italian study , published in the European Journal of Cancer in June 2008 , also confirms and supports earlier studies showing improved survival rates in melanoma patients who were exposed to sunlight more frequently in the time before their melanoma was diagnosed .
This suggests sunlight can actually help skin cancer .
Let ’ s be clear , healthy sun exposure may not cause skin cancer , but a bad sunburn and unhealthy exposure can .
We do need shade , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sun may be natural and not as dangerous as it ’ s been made out to be .
You can also cover up with clothes , which is more effective than sunscreen as it doesn ’ t block 100 percent of UV rays .
Many natural oils have also been shown to have SPF protection , so you could do some more research on this if you ’ re interested .
Below is a video of Dr. Elizabeth Plourde , a licensed Clinical Laboratory Scientist who also has degrees in Biological Science and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ California State University , Pepperdine University and San Diego Univeristy for Integrative Studies .
Currenty , Dr. Plourde uses her experience in her fields of study as well has her work in medical laboratories to focus attention on the hazards of sunscreen , among other things .
A lot of fear has been pumped into the population , to the point where people are terrified to go out into the sun without putting on sunscreen every single time .
We are now only starting to understand the long term health consequences of such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of many environmental causes contributing to several age-related diseases .
Don ’ t be too scared — it ’ s not like you ’ ll develop cancer or a hormone disrupting disease after using conventional sunscreen once .
This requires long-term exposure to these chemicals , which is in part why so many people don ’ t care about what they put on their bodies .
At the end of the day , there are other things you can do , but just know that sunlight is really nothing to fear .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ amounts , and given the amount of time we spend indoors , the more sunlight we are exposed to the better .

By
Collective Evolution has been creating awareness about the potential dangers of sunscreen since the beginning of 2009. When we started to, despite presenting credible peer-reviewed scientific publications and interviews with doctors and scientists, many simply thought this wasn’t true. The idea that our federal health regulatory agencies are really looking out for our health and the idea that we can put absolute trust into these agencies as well as the products that they approve are no longer valid. Enormous amounts of corruption have been exposed over the past decade, which goes to show that we really need to rely on ourselves, utilize our critical thinking, and do our own research instead of allowing government authoritative bodies to do it for us.
Sunscreen, and the entire cosmetics industry for that matter, is a great example of how a lack of oversight exists when it comes to the approval of these products. How were they ever approved and marketed as safe?
A new study published Monday in the peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA found that several active ingredients in different sunscreens enter the bloodstream at levels that far exceed the FDA’s recommended threshold without a government safety inspection.
The study used 4 commercially available sunscreens, which all resulted in plasma concentrations that exceeded the safety levels established by the FDA. These safety levels themselves should also be questioned, as any amount of toxic chemicals is not really safe in the body, even in trace amounts. The study also points out that it’s questionable that the FDA waved “some nonclinical toxicology studies for sunscreens.” Clearly more are needed. The study concluded that “the systemic absorption of sunscreen ingredients supports the need for further studies to determine the clinical significance of these findings,” although, strangely, it did mention that the results “do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen.”
It’s odd that the authors would state that, perhaps they did so because it’s a study that was conducted by the FDA? You would think that “plasma concentrations” that exceed safety levels would have the authors urging individuals to seek out less harmful sunscreen products, since these are available at multiple natural health stores.
The big takeaway here is that, what goes on your skin goes into your skin, and it doesn’t take long. The study mentioned observed chemicals seep into the bloodstream via sunscreen in just 24 hours.
It’s interesting how this particular study caught the attention of the mainstream, when numerous studies have shown the same thing. For example, a study led by researchers at UC Berkeley and Clinica de Salud del Valle Salinas demonstrated how taking even a short break from various cosmetics, shampoos, and other personal care products can lead to a substantial drop in the levels of hormone-disrupting chemicals present within the body. (source)
After just a three-day trial with the girls using only the lower-chemical products, urine samples showed a significant drop in the level of chemicals in the body. Methyl and propyl parabens, commonly used as preservatives in cosmetics, dropped 44% and 45%, respectively, and metabolites of diethyl phthalate, used often in perfumes, dropped by 27%, and both triclosan and benzophenone-3 fell 36%.
Pretty, crazy, isn’t it?
Back to sunscreen! As far back as 2004, a study conducted at the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Manitoba, Canada, sought to develop a method for quantifying common sunscreen agents. Results demonstrated a significant penetration of all sunscreen agents into the skin, meaning all of these chemicals are entering multiple tissues within the body. (source)
What type of chemicals are we talking about? Oxybenzone is present in multiple popular sunscreens, for example. There are multiple studies that have outlined the dangers of this chemical, as it’s linked to several ailments. For example, a study out of the Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology from the University of Zurich determined that oxybenzone may also mimic the effects of estrogen in the body and promote the growth of cancer cells.
Prompted by multiple studies, a study out of the Queensland Cancer Fund Laboratories at the Queensland Institute of Medical Research in Australia recognized the significance of systemic absorption of sunscreens. Researchers discovered that oxybenzone inhibited cell growth and DNA synthesis and retarded cycle progression in the first of the four phases of the cell cycle. They determined that sunscreen causes mitochondrial stress and changes in drug uptake in certain cell lines.
These are a few of multiple examples, and it’s only for one chemical out of the multiple hormone disrupting, harmful chemicals found within sunscreen.
Furthermore, various studies have shown that sunscreen ingredients, like oxybenzone, actually increase the absorption of other harmful chemicals, like herbicides, which we are constantly exposed to as well.
Agricultural workers are encouraged to use sunscreen to decrease the risk of UV-related skin cancer. Our previous studies have shown certain commercial sunscreens to be penetration enhancers. The focus of this project is to determine whether active ingredients in sunscreen formulations (i.e., the UV absorbing components and insect repellants for the sunscreen/bug repellant combinations) also act as dermal penetration enhancers for herbicides in vitro. Additional studies demonstrated that the penetration enhancement seen across hairless mouse skin also occurred with human skin. Thus, the active ingredients of sunscreen formulations enhance dermal penetration of the moderately lipophilic herbicide 2,4-D. (source)
Again, the main point here is that what you put on your body goes into your body. If you’re putting on sunscreen, or make-up, and you read all of the ingredients, all of those ingredients are also entering into your bloodstream.
So, What’s The Solution?
Are we really supposed to avoid the sun? It doesn’t seem too natural, as it provides us with an enormous amount of nourishment. Not just us, but all life on Earth. Was fear of the sun simply used as a marketing tactic to avoid it and sell these products? Sure, sunburns are bad and can cause cancer, but simple sun exposure is not bad for you. We burn because our skin is not used to so much sun exposure, as we now live unnatural lives out of the sun. When we all of a sudden spend more time outdoors, our skin doesn’t have the time to adjust, and so it burns.
If you want to wear sunscreen, the answer is simple: Seek out sunscreen products without harmful chemicals. Go to a natural health store, do your own research, look online, seek out natural alternative products, and perhaps slowly begin to spend more time outside so your skin adjusts and becomes less prone to burning.
Should we really be spending more time in the sun? According to a study published in the Journal of Internal Medicine, the life expectancy of people that avoided sun exposure was reduced by about 2 years compared to those who regularly sun bathed. The study even pointed out that nonsmokers who stayed out of the sun had a life expectancy similar to smokers who had the highest level of sun exposure. (source)
In the study, the researchers looked at data from 29,518 Swedish women. The women were 25-64 years of age at the start of the study. The study was originally designed to evaluate the rate of melanoma, a type of skin cancer, so sun exposure was one of the variables that was being examined.
The results showed that women who regularly sun bathed lived longer because they had a lower rate of death, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and deaths that were not due to cancer or CVD as compared to those who avoided sun exposure. However, these women did have a higher rate of death due to cancer, which was in part because they lived longer.
Because nonsmokers who avoided sun exposure had a life expectancy similar to smokers in the highest sun exposure group, the researchers concluded that avoidance of sun exposure is a risk factor for death of a similar magnitude as smoking.
This isn’t a big surprise, as the sun gives us vitamin D, which plays a huge role in our overall health, especially when it comes to our cardiovascular strength, organ function, blood pressure, bone health, and our immune system. We need sun exposure, and if we are putting on sunscreen every time we are out in the sun as a result of fear propaganda, we are not getting all of those health benefits. Please understand that this list of important benefits represents a fraction of the many ways in which vitamin D helps optimize your health. And, although you can obtain vitamin D from natural food sources, experts agree on one thing: Sunlight is by far the best way to get your vitamin D. The so-called experts who advise you to avoid all sunlight and religiously apply sunscreen are actually encouraging you to increase your risk of cancer, not lower it.
A huge and growing amount of research has now shown that avoiding sun exposure has created an epidemic of vitamin D deficiency. Current estimates are that at least 50% of the general population and 80% in infants are deficient in vitamin D. Low levels of D3 are now known to play a major role in the development in many of the chronic degenerative diseases. In fact, vitamin D deficiency may be the most common medical condition in the world and vitamin D supplementation may be the most cost effective strategy in improving health, reducing disease, and living longer. Those deficient in vitamin D have twice the rate of death and a doubling of risk for many diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, asthma and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis. – Dr. Michael Murray (source)
There are so many more studies that back up the information shared in this article. One study revealed that melanoma patients who had higher levels of sun exposure were less likely to die than other melanoma patients, and patients who already had melanoma and got a lot of sun exposure were prone to a less aggressive tumor type. Perhaps there are more prominent causes of skin cancer than the sun?
An Italian study, published in the European Journal of Cancer in June 2008, also confirms and supports earlier studies showing improved survival rates in melanoma patients who were exposed to sunlight more frequently in the time before their melanoma was diagnosed.
This suggests sunlight can actually help skin cancer.
Let’s be clear, healthy sun exposure may not cause skin cancer, but a bad sunburn and unhealthy exposure can. We do need shade, but spending a day out in the sun may be natural and not as dangerous as it’s been made out to be. You can also cover up with clothes, which is more effective than sunscreen as it doesn’t block 100 percent of UV rays.
Many natural oils have also been shown to have SPF protection, so you could do some more research on this if you’re interested.
Below is a video of Dr. Elizabeth Plourde, a licensed Clinical Laboratory Scientist who also has degrees in Biological Science and Psychology. Dr. Plourde has degrees from California State University, Pepperdine University and San Diego Univeristy for Integrative Studies. Currenty, Dr. Plourde uses her experience in her fields of study as well has her work in medical laboratories to focus attention on the hazards of sunscreen, among other things.
The Takeaway
A lot of fear has been pumped into the population, to the point where people are terrified to go out into the sun without putting on sunscreen every single time. We are now only starting to understand the long term health consequences of such a practice, and this could be one of many environmental causes contributing to several age-related diseases. Don’t be too scared — it’s not like you’ll develop cancer or a hormone disrupting disease after using conventional sunscreen once. This requires long-term exposure to these chemicals, which is in part why so many people don’t care about what they put on their bodies.
At the end of the day, there are other things you can do, but just know that sunlight is really nothing to fear. It’s very healthy in appropriate amounts, and given the amount of time we spend indoors, the more sunlight we are exposed to the better.
This article originally appeared on Collective Evolution.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-06-16--Former Defense Secretary William Cohen: “Nationalism is Confined to a Specific Group of People and T

Former Defense Secretary William Cohen: “Nationalism is Confined to a Specific Group of People and That’s White People”

Just your daily dose of anti-Whitism coming from a jew who used to be in charge of the defense of @ @ @ @ @ Nationalism is confined to a specific group of people and that ’ s white people @ @ @ @ @ Secretary William Cohen pic.twitter.com/6gjITCNzHJ

Just your daily dose of anti-Whitism coming from a jew who used to be in charge of the defense of the United States.


renegadetribune--2020-06-16--J.S. Bach: 6 Suites for Cello Solo

J.S. Bach: 6 Suites for Cello Solo

About this album : In May 2014 the Hungarian cellist István Várdai performed three Bach Suites at an unusual venue in New York : not the storied glamour of Carnegie Hall or the hip 92st St Y , but the Board of Officers Room in the recently renovated Armory on Park Avenue , a room no less redolent of distinguished history : to which he made his own distinguished contribution according to the New York Times , with a recital which concluded with a ‘ superb ’ performance of the Sixth Suite .
Bach ’ s iconic solo suites form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the ultimate challenge and a Mount Everest every young and aspiring cellist has to climb , no matter how often that has already been done .
Young Hungarian cellist István Várdai is winner of the Geneva Competition , 3rd prize Tchaikovsky Competition 2007 and first prize winner of the prestigious ARD competition in 2014 .
He embarked on a successful international career , having played with Mikhael Pletnev , Adám Fischer , Zoltán Kocsis , and chamber music partner of Gidon Kremer , Mischa Maisky , Elisabeth Leonskaja , Andras Schiff , @ @ @ @ @ @

About this album: In May 2014 the Hungarian cellist István Várdai performed three Bach Suites at an unusual venue in New York: not the storied glamour of Carnegie Hall or the hip 92st St Y, but the Board of Officers Room in the recently renovated Armory on Park Avenue, a room no less redolent of distinguished history: to which he made his own distinguished contribution according to the New York Times, with a recital which concluded with a ‘superb’ performance of the Sixth Suite. Bach’s iconic solo suites form the pinnacle of the entire cello repertoire, the ultimate challenge and a Mount Everest every young and aspiring cellist has to climb, no matter how often that has already been done.
Young Hungarian cellist István Várdai is winner of the Geneva Competition, 3rd prize Tchaikovsky Competition 2007 and first prize winner of the prestigious ARD competition in 2014. He embarked on a successful international career, having played with Mikhael Pletnev, Adám Fischer, Zoltán Kocsis, and chamber music partner of Gidon Kremer, Mischa Maisky, Elisabeth Leonskaja, Andras Schiff, Klára Würtz and many others.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-06-16--VIDEO: Rioters Tearing Down Statue Chase Man Down And Attack Him, Man Shoots Assailant in Self-Defen

VIDEO: Rioters Tearing Down Statue Chase Man Down And Attack Him, Man Shoots Assailant in Self-Defense

A violent mob of rioters tearing down a statue in Albuquerque , New Mexico on Monday were filmed chasing a man down in the streets and attacking him with fists and a skateboard only for the man to shoot one in self-defense .
The media and Twitterati were reporting the story as a “ white supremacist ” attack on “ peaceful protesters ” but their narrative collapse after video surfaced showing the lynch mob chased the man down , pummeled him , threw him to the ground and bashed him with a skateboard .
The man only then fired back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man was trying to protect the statue and could have been part of a patriot group called the New Mexico Civil Guard .
Democratic New Mexico Governor Michelle Grisham issued a statement after the above video had surfaced where she sided with the mob , convicted the patriot group without evidence or a trial , neglected to mention that the rioters were tearing down a statue and said she ’ s “ praying ” for the attacker and suggested it doesn ’ t matter who “ strike [ d ] first.
” Although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ situation , I am horrified and disgusted beyond words by the reports of violence at a protest Monday night in Albuquerque .
The heavily armed individuals who flaunted themselves at the protest , calling themselves a “ civil guard , ” were there for one reason : To menace protesters , to present an unsanctioned show of unregulated force .
To menace the people of New Mexico with weaponry – with an implicit threat of violence – is on its face unacceptable ; that violence did indeed occur is unspeakable .
I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in touch with local officials ; the individual who was injured is in my prayers , and I am thinking of their family and friends .
Let me clear : There is absolutely no space in New Mexico for any violent would-be ‘ militia ’ seeking to terrorize New Mexicans ; and there is no space for violence of any kind on our streets and in our communities , or for any sort of escalation of reckless , violent rhetoric , no matter who strikes first .
The instigators this evening will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and they will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law .
[ Emphasis added ] The law-abiding defending a piece of American history will be treated like criminals while the actual criminals tearing down a piece of American history and violently attacking anyone who stands in their way will be hailed as saints .

By Chris Menahan
A violent mob of rioters tearing down a statue in Albuquerque, New Mexico on Monday were filmed chasing a man down in the streets and attacking him with fists and a skateboard only for the man to shoot one in self-defense.
The media and Twitterati were reporting the story as a “white supremacist” attack on “peaceful protesters” but their narrative collapse after video surfaced showing the lynch mob chased the man down, pummeled him, threw him to the ground and bashed him with a skateboard.
The man only then fired back in self-defense.
We just obtained video of the shooting. pic.twitter.com/yjB6NHdKe2 — Megan Abundis (@meganrabundis) June 16, 2020
Unconfirmed reports claimed the man was trying to protect the statue and could have been part of a patriot group called the New Mexico Civil Guard.
Democratic New Mexico Governor Michelle Grisham issued a statement after the above video had surfaced where she sided with the mob, convicted the patriot group without evidence or a trial, neglected to mention that the rioters were tearing down a statue and said she’s “praying” for the attacker and suggested it doesn’t matter who “strike[d] first.”
My statement on the “militia” and violence in Albuquerque tonight: pic.twitter.com/BZISvyau3k — Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham (@GovMLG) June 16, 2020
Grisham’s full statement reads:
Although we are still learning more about the situation, I am horrified and disgusted beyond words by the reports of violence at a protest Monday night in Albuquerque. The heavily armed individuals who flaunted themselves at the protest, calling themselves a “civil guard,” were there for one reason: To menace protesters, to present an unsanctioned show of unregulated force. To menace the people of New Mexico with weaponry – with an implicit threat of violence – is on its face unacceptable; that violence did indeed occur is unspeakable. I am monitoring the situation; my administration is in touch with local officials; the individual who was injured is in my prayers, and I am thinking of their family and friends. Let me clear: There is absolutely no space in New Mexico for any violent would-be ‘militia’ seeking to terrorize New Mexicans; and there is no space for violence of any kind on our streets and in our communities, or for any sort of escalation of reckless, violent rhetoric, no matter who strikes first. The instigators this evening will be rooted out, they will be investigated, and they will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. [Emphasis added]
The law-abiding defending a piece of American history will be treated like criminals while the actual criminals tearing down a piece of American history and violently attacking anyone who stands in their way will be hailed as saints.
Absolutely disgraceful.
This article originally appeared on Information Liberation.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-06-17--Sudetenland: The jewish Ethnic Cleansing of Sudeten and Carpathia

“ Sudeten ” refers to a mountain range 200 miles long and 20 to 40 miles wide , covering the north of Bohemia and Moravia as well as part of Sudeten Silesia .
Germans inhabited this “ Czech ” territory well before Slavic tribes arrived around 500 AD , although major German settlement in the Sudeten began during the reign of King Premysl Otakar II in the 13th century when the area was largely uninhabited and heavily forested .
For centuries , Czechs were but a very small minority here .
Sudeten German civilians , on the basis of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were not personally responsible for the suffering of the Czech people , were held accountable for all wartime Czech suffering by means of collective guilt .
Hence , to this day their expulsion and the severe hardships which more than 3,000,000 people endured , the loss of everything they possessed and the vicious cruelty inflicted upon them in one of the largest forced population transfers in history , is viewed by some , including the majority of Czechs , as fully justified and even commendable .
The unique Sudeten and Carpathian German communities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jewish led Czech government has never made any admission of guilt for their role in this horrendous , flagrant human rights violation .
Indeed , the “ Beneš Decrees ” that granted immunity to Czech citizens for expelling Germans and confiscating their property without compensation is still on the books , and legally the rape , theft or even murder of a German adult or child is technically legal under the law .
The jews artificially built Second Czechoslovak “ Republic ” was abetted by foreign assistance , support and endorsements which it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ substituted the once harmonious coexistence of the Czech , German , Slovak and Hungarian people with brutality , denial of basic human rights , theft and murder .
Benes was determined that his Czechoslovakia should not only keep its pre-war borders , but rid itself of its German minority , and after coming to power following the war , it did that with immense greed .
Greed was the strongest motive for all of the expulsions .
Benes constructed his decrees as early as 1940 during his exile , suggesting the expulsion of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confiscation of their property , a cold , merciless solution fully supported by both the jewish led Allies and the jewish Soviets .
The murder and expulsions began in earnest when the Benes “ reslovakization ” programs started in 1945 .
Women , children and old people paid the price .
All of the pent up rage at the war , the world or simply one ’ s personal misfortunes was directed at these civilian non-combatants in a gruesome , genocidal mix of punishments .
Already , in May of 1945 , Czech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local vigilantes violently drove hundreds of thousands of Germans from their homes and across the borders of devastated and occupied Germany and Austria , torturing and murdering many in what Czechs refer to as the “ wild transfer.
” The Czechoslovak army played a central role in the horrors .
General Zdeněk Novák issued an order to “ deport all Germans from territory within the historical borders ” citing the “ Ten Commandments for Czechoslovak Soldiers in the Border Regions ” which directed soldiers that “ The Germans have remained our irreconcilable enemies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Germans… Behave towards Germans like a victor… Be harsh to the Germans… German women and the Hitler Youth also bear the blame for the crimes of the Germans .
Deal with them too in an uncompromising way.
” On March 28 , 1946 , the provisional jewish Czech government formally mandated that all German civilians were to be collectively presumed guilty and stripped of their citizenship and their property .
This included the most barbarous persecution and oppression of minorities humanly imaginable : rape , deportations , expulsions , internments , kangaroo courts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forced labor camps .
Over three and a half million Sudeten Germans were brutally expelled from their homes and farms .
Even very old people much too frail to travel were evicted and forced into an early death .
Benes and company applied this ruthless policy to ethnic Hungarians as well .
The still valid Benes decree # 115 of May 8 , 1946 declared all deeds against Germans , down to the rape and murder of children , were “ justified acts of retribution ” that could not be prosecuted .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyone with a penchant for lust , murder , revenge or theft .
The only exceptions from expulsion were 244,000 ethnic German “ anti-fascists ” and other ethnic Germans absolutely crucial for industries stolen from Germans .
They were allowed to remain in Czechoslovakia and were worked as slaves for their Czech masters , but only as long as needed .
In 1946 , an estimated 1.3 million ethnic Germans were deported to the American zone of future West Germany and an estimated 800,000 were deported to the Soviet zone , later East @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right , which many of us have seen , shows train cars crammed full of Germans expelled from their homes , and was originally described by the government as : “ Freight trains full of refugees , 1946 .
Crowded freight train bound for the Ruhr region .
Background , double-decker train to Lübeck.
” The bombed-out Hamburg RR Station looms behind .
This photo was later cropped , retouched and widely distributed in 1981 with the caption : ( “ Nazi ” ) “ transports into ghettos and extermination camps.
” On @ @ @ @ @ @ @ branded with paint , being expelled .
Thousands of German civilians were interned in concentration camps where they were murdered by poisoning , intentional starvation and unchecked disease .
2,061 such camps existed in Czechoslovakia .
In the Mährisch-Ostrau camp around 350 people were tortured to death by early July 1945 .
Foreign observations and primary accounts document are rife with tales of Czech police looking the other way as guards physically and sexually abused German women in forced labor camps , often to such a brutal extent that thousands of women committed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time reported to the Central Committee in Moscow that the Czechs “ don ’ t kill them , but torment them like livestock .
The Czechs look at the Germans like cattle ” German civilians thrown into Czech concentration camps ranged in age from 4 to 80 and were crammed together in tents or shacks and slowly starved to death .
It is thought that approximately 10,000 people died in Bohemian and Moravian camps and prisons from 1945 to 1948 from murder , epidemics , starvation and general abuse .
One such notorious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Budweis was commanded in the years 1945-6 by Václav Hrneček who later fled Czechoslovakia and went to Bavaria where he was recognized by former German inmates of the camp and brought to trial before an American Court of the Allied High Commission for Germany .
He received an eight year sentence for his criminal and cruel camp , a virtual center of sadism .
Similar conditions were found in the internment camp near Kolín , where internees were raped , beaten and killed .
According to some estimates , approximately 10,000 people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prisons from 1945 to 1948 .
Some people were crammed in freight cars and shipped out , such as the cramped , thirsty transport of Sudeten Germans from Troppau in Czech Silesia that arrived in Berlin in August , 1945 .
After 18 hellish days of travel , only 1,350 out of 4,250 women , children and old people were still alive .
Many were forced to walk out .
Reduced to skin and bones , refugees were starving on the roadsides , with women , children and babies dead in the ditches @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a bombed-out , starving and already over-strained West Germany were regarded at times as unwanted foreigners .
They had to struggle to fit in and were lucky to get even menial jobs .
Likewise , local Carpathian Germans either fled or were killed in death camps such as Svaljava .
700 people from Theresienthal were taken for slave labor in Siberia , the last ones not being freed until 1969 .
At the end of 1946 , after “ evacuation , ” about 24,000 ethnic Germans still remained alive in Slovakia .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Slovakia ended in the late 1940s , the years of discrimination resulted in a quick and disparate assimilation .
The figures of Sudeten German deaths as a result of the ethnic cleansing process range from a ridiculously low Czech ( together with modern apologetic German ) estimates of 15,000 , which blurs the issue by distorting the true count , to the traditional standard figure of 270,000 ( i.e .
figure from the Sudetendeutsche Landsmannschaft ) which stood for almost half a century .
Likewise , figures from the Brünn death march @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to an unrealistic low today of 800 .
Of the several thousands who died in the process of ethnic cleansing , some sources state that 16,000 alone were documented as dying from direct violent deaths and 6,000 from “ suicides ’ ‘ during the expulsion , with thousands more died from hunger and illness as a consequence .
Like jewish Allied bombing mortality figures , they are constantly being revised downward and never readjusted as higher .
The Germanic villagers living for centuries along the sections of ancient salt routes through the present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and either murdered or exiled , their homes and farms brazenly stolen .
The place names of German villages and cities in these areas were all changed , and their histories subsequently stolen , erased or rewritten .
An example is the farming village of BoemishRoerhren , a centuries-old resting and watering place for salt trade horses going from Passau to Prachatitz to exchange salt for wheat and barley .
The village was laid out facing the morning sun against the mountain .
The Germans were brutally expelled in 1944 at sunrise .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Budějovice , ” the entire ethnic German population living in the city was forced to assemble .
Some were murdered outright , and the rest were forced into exile under horrible conditions , leaving their homes , farms and businesses behind .
Today , Budweis is part of the present day Czech Republic with its German heritage rewritten as Czech .
Even small hamlets were cleansed of their German histories .
For well over 700 years , German-speaking people had inhabited Zuckmantel , the birthplace of Franz Schubert ’ s mother Maria Vietz @ @ @ @ @ @ @ remnants of them were cruelly driven out at the end of World War Two between December and January of 1946 .
Their new Czech masters almost overnight , by gun point , issued the following directive upon banishing them : that the inhabitants must leave their houses “ completely furnished ; curtains , carpets , lamps , bed linen… with beds to be freshly made for 2 persons per home .
The luggage may not be packed in carpets and coats… .
Certified luggage for a person : 30 kg and 10 kg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be left in the home !
” These citizens were never repaid for the theft of their homes and properties .
Zuckmantel ( now “ Zlate Hory ” ) was the home of Schubert ’ s father , Franz Theodor Schubert .
He moved in 1783 from German-speaking Neudorf near Mährisch-Schönberg in the Sudetenland to Vienna .
There also were genocidal expulsions here after the war ’ s end .
The ethnic and cultural face of the whole land was changed , even in the smallest of villages and the most remote hilltop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population was expelled and replaced by Poles on the rugged northern Silesian side of the Riesenberg mountain range and by Czechs on the southern Bohemian side .
The brutal ethnic cleansing program innocuously termed a “ population exchange ” led to a decline of the cultural landscape , and in many large parts of the mountains , the meadows went to seed , settlements vanished and hundreds of traditional mountain houses , chapels and monuments decayed or were destroyed because they were German in origin .
“ Liberec will never again be Reichenberg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ German enemies , and we will do it so thoroughly that not the smallest place will remain where the German seed could grow once more .
We shall expel all the Germans , we shall confiscate their property , we shall de-nationalize not only the town but the whole area .
so that the victorious spirit of Slavdom shall permeate the country from the frontier range to the interior .
The government is determined to settle the question of the Germans uncompromisingly and unflinchingly .
We are aware that , in the West @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are at work .
But the government will not be misled or softened by any pressure , any campaigns , any libellous attacks .
It is for us a decisive and encouraging fact that the Soviet Union stands by us in the question of transferring the Germans , and that Marshal Stalin himself has the greatest possible understanding for our endeavors to get rid of the Germans .
We will not allow even some hundreds of thousands of Germans to remain in this country .
We do not want any Germans along our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form one integrally Slav territory with Poland and the Soviet Union.
” Kopecky , the Stalinist Minister of Propaganda in the Czech cabinet , stated in a speech at Reichenberg ( now “ Liberec ” ) on July 25 , 1945 .
And , Jan Masaryk , son of Czech founding president Tomáš Masaryk , boasted that the Czech nation was finally “ over with the Germans of Czechoslovakia… There is no possible way to get us to live under the same umbrella again.
” Gablonz an der Neiße in northern Bohemia was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Region and it had for centuries a large German majority , mainly glass blowers and glass workers .
After the Czech decree that all property belonging to the “ German Race ” be confiscated without compensation , many of the Germans who were expelled from Gablonz ( now “ Jablonec ” ) migrated near to the old Bavarian town of Kaufbeuren where they founded the township of Neugablonz .
That some Czechs , in the same manner as some Poles , Yugoslavians and others who in this manner acquired German properties , have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the ethnic killings and expulsions while demanding blood money from the German government for themselves as restitution and reparations , is unconscionable .
Regardless of whether ‘ only ’ 20,000 were killed in the expulsions or 250,000 , the fact remains that jewish led Czechoslovaks ultimately destroyed an entire ethnic community of more than 3,000,000 civilians which , by standards involving any other ethnic group other than Germans , would constitute genocide .
Budweiss and Gablonz , above .

The Sudetenland: Stolen Suffering
“Sudeten” refers to a mountain range 200 miles long and 20 to 40 miles wide, covering the north of Bohemia and Moravia as well as part of Sudeten Silesia. Germans inhabited this “Czech” territory well before Slavic tribes arrived around 500 AD, although major German settlement in the Sudeten began during the reign of King Premysl Otakar II in the 13th century when the area was largely uninhabited and heavily forested. For centuries, Czechs were but a very small minority here.
Sudeten German civilians, on the basis of their ethnic identity alone and although they themselves were not personally responsible for the suffering of the Czech people, were held accountable for all wartime Czech suffering by means of collective guilt. Hence, to this day their expulsion and the severe hardships which more than 3,000,000 people endured, the loss of everything they possessed and the vicious cruelty inflicted upon them in one of the largest forced population transfers in history, is viewed by some, including the majority of Czechs, as fully justified and even commendable.
The unique Sudeten and Carpathian German communities have vanished from the earth. The jewish led Czech government has never made any admission of guilt for their role in this horrendous, flagrant human rights violation. Indeed, the “Beneš Decrees” that granted immunity to Czech citizens for expelling Germans and confiscating their property without compensation is still on the books, and legally the rape, theft or even murder of a German adult or child is technically legal under the law.
The jews artificially built Second Czechoslovak “Republic” was abetted by foreign assistance, support and endorsements which it received despite the xenophobic Benes Decrees which substituted the once harmonious coexistence of the Czech, German, Slovak and Hungarian people with brutality, denial of basic human rights, theft and murder. Benes was determined that his Czechoslovakia should not only keep its pre-war borders, but rid itself of its German minority, and after coming to power following the war, it did that with immense greed. Greed was the strongest motive for all of the expulsions.
Benes constructed his decrees as early as 1940 during his exile, suggesting the expulsion of all ethnic Germans from Czechoslovakia and the confiscation of their property, a cold, merciless solution fully supported by both the jewish led Allies and the jewish Soviets. The murder and expulsions began in earnest when the Benes “reslovakization” programs started in 1945. Women, children and old people paid the price.
All of the pent up rage at the war, the world or simply one’s personal misfortunes was directed at these civilian non-combatants in a gruesome, genocidal mix of punishments. Already, in May of 1945, Czech paramilitaries, army units and gangs of local vigilantes violently drove hundreds of thousands of Germans from their homes and across the borders of devastated and occupied Germany and Austria, torturing and murdering many in what Czechs refer to as the “wild transfer.”
The Czechoslovak army played a central role in the horrors. General Zdeněk Novák issued an order to “deport all Germans from territory within the historical borders” citing the “Ten Commandments for Czechoslovak Soldiers in the Border Regions” which directed soldiers that “The Germans have remained our irreconcilable enemies. Do not cease to hate the Germans… Behave towards Germans like a victor… Be harsh to the Germans… German women and the Hitler Youth also bear the blame for the crimes of the Germans. Deal with them too in an uncompromising way.”
On March 28, 1946, the provisional jewish Czech government formally mandated that all German civilians were to be collectively presumed guilty and stripped of their citizenship and their property. This included the most barbarous persecution and oppression of minorities humanly imaginable: rape, deportations, expulsions, internments, kangaroo courts, confiscation of property and the use forced labor camps. Over three and a half million Sudeten Germans were brutally expelled from their homes and farms. Even very old people much too frail to travel were evicted and forced into an early death. Benes and company applied this ruthless policy to ethnic Hungarians as well.
The still valid Benes decree #115 of May 8, 1946 declared all deeds against Germans, down to the rape and murder of children, were “justified acts of retribution” that could not be prosecuted. This led to unfathomable and sadistic abuses by anyone with a penchant for lust, murder, revenge or theft.
The only exceptions from expulsion were 244,000 ethnic German “anti-fascists” and other ethnic Germans absolutely crucial for industries stolen from Germans. They were allowed to remain in Czechoslovakia and were worked as slaves for their Czech masters, but only as long as needed. In 1946, an estimated 1.3 million ethnic Germans were deported to the American zone of future West Germany and an estimated 800,000 were deported to the Soviet zone, later East Germany.
This famous photograph, above right, which many of us have seen, shows train cars crammed full of Germans expelled from their homes, and was originally described by the government as: “Freight trains full of refugees, 1946. Crowded freight train bound for the Ruhr region. Background, double-decker train to Lübeck.” The bombed-out Hamburg RR Station looms behind. This photo was later cropped, retouched and widely distributed in 1981 with the caption: (“Nazi”) “transports into ghettos and extermination camps.” On the left, Sudeten Germans, some branded with paint, being expelled.
Thousands of German civilians were interned in concentration camps where they were murdered by poisoning, intentional starvation and unchecked disease. 2,061 such camps existed in Czechoslovakia. In the Mährisch-Ostrau camp around 350 people were tortured to death by early July 1945.
Foreign observations and primary accounts document are rife with tales of Czech police looking the other way as guards physically and sexually abused German women in forced labor camps, often to such a brutal extent that thousands of women committed suicide. Even Soviet observers at the time reported to the Central Committee in Moscow that the Czechs “don’t kill them, but torment them like livestock. The Czechs look at the Germans like cattle”
German civilians thrown into Czech concentration camps ranged in age from 4 to 80 and were crammed together in tents or shacks and slowly starved to death. It is thought that approximately 10,000 people died in Bohemian and Moravian camps and prisons from 1945 to 1948 from murder, epidemics, starvation and general abuse. One such notorious concentration camps at the once German town of Budweis was commanded in the years 1945-6 by Václav Hrneček who later fled Czechoslovakia and went to Bavaria where he was recognized by former German inmates of the camp and brought to trial before an American Court of the Allied High Commission for Germany. He received an eight year sentence for his criminal and cruel camp, a virtual center of sadism. Similar conditions were found in the internment camp near Kolín, where internees were raped, beaten and killed. According to some estimates, approximately 10,000 people died in Bohemian and Moravian camps and prisons from 1945 to 1948.
Some people were crammed in freight cars and shipped out, such as the cramped, thirsty transport of Sudeten Germans from Troppau in Czech Silesia that arrived in Berlin in August, 1945. After 18 hellish days of travel, only 1,350 out of 4,250 women, children and old people were still alive.
Many were forced to walk out. Reduced to skin and bones, refugees were starving on the roadsides, with women, children and babies dead in the ditches. Those Germans who made it alive to a bombed-out, starving and already over-strained West Germany were regarded at times as unwanted foreigners. They had to struggle to fit in and were lucky to get even menial jobs.
Likewise, local Carpathian Germans either fled or were killed in death camps such as Svaljava. 700 people from Theresienthal were taken for slave labor in Siberia, the last ones not being freed until 1969. At the end of 1946, after “evacuation,” about 24,000 ethnic Germans still remained alive in Slovakia. Although most overt violence against German civilians in Slovakia ended in the late 1940s, the years of discrimination resulted in a quick and disparate assimilation.
The figures of Sudeten German deaths as a result of the ethnic cleansing process range from a ridiculously low Czech (together with modern apologetic German) estimates of 15,000, which blurs the issue by distorting the true count, to the traditional standard figure of 270,000 (i.e. figure from the Sudetendeutsche Landsmannschaft) which stood for almost half a century. Likewise, figures from the Brünn death march alone range an older figure of 20,000 to an unrealistic low today of 800. Of the several thousands who died in the process of ethnic cleansing, some sources state that 16,000 alone were documented as dying from direct violent deaths and 6,000 from “suicides’ ‘ during the expulsion, with thousands more died from hunger and illness as a consequence. Like jewish Allied bombing mortality figures, they are constantly being revised downward and never readjusted as higher.
The Germanic villagers living for centuries along the sections of ancient salt routes through the present day Czech Republic were all rounded up and either murdered or exiled, their homes and farms brazenly stolen. The place names of German villages and cities in these areas were all changed, and their histories subsequently stolen, erased or rewritten. An example is the farming village of BoemishRoerhren, a centuries-old resting and watering place for salt trade horses going from Passau to Prachatitz to exchange salt for wheat and barley. The village was laid out facing the morning sun against the mountain. The Germans were brutally expelled in 1944 at sunrise.
In 1945 Budweis, now “České Budějovice,” the entire ethnic German population living in the city was forced to assemble. Some were murdered outright, and the rest were forced into exile under horrible conditions, leaving their homes, farms and businesses behind. Today, Budweis is part of the present day Czech Republic with its German heritage rewritten as Czech.
Even small hamlets were cleansed of their German histories. For well over 700 years, German-speaking people had inhabited Zuckmantel, the birthplace of Franz Schubert’s mother Maria Vietz (1756-1812) until the very last remnants of them were cruelly driven out at the end of World War Two between December and January of 1946. Their new Czech masters almost overnight, by gun point, issued the following directive upon banishing them: that the inhabitants must leave their houses “completely furnished; curtains, carpets, lamps, bed linen… with beds to be freshly made for 2 persons per home. The luggage may not be packed in carpets and coats…. Certified luggage for a person : 30 kg and 10 kg hand baggage. All else is to be left in the home!”
These citizens were never repaid for the theft of their homes and properties. Zuckmantel (now “Zlate Hory”) was the home of Schubert’s father, Franz Theodor Schubert. He moved in 1783 from German-speaking Neudorf near Mährisch-Schönberg in the Sudetenland to Vienna. There also were genocidal expulsions here after the war’s end.
The ethnic and cultural face of the whole land was changed, even in the smallest of villages and the most remote hilltop hamlets. For example, the German population was expelled and replaced by Poles on the rugged northern Silesian side of the Riesenberg mountain range and by Czechs on the southern Bohemian side. The brutal ethnic cleansing program innocuously termed a “population exchange” led to a decline of the cultural landscape, and in many large parts of the mountains, the meadows went to seed, settlements vanished and hundreds of traditional mountain houses, chapels and monuments decayed or were destroyed because they were German in origin.
“Liberec will never again be Reichenberg. We will clear Liberec of the German enemies, and we will do it so thoroughly that not the smallest place will remain where the German seed could grow once more. We shall expel all the Germans, we shall confiscate their property, we shall de-nationalize not only the town but the whole area. so that the victorious spirit of Slavdom shall permeate the country from the frontier range to the interior. The government is determined to settle the question of the Germans uncompromisingly and unflinchingly. We are aware that, in the West, various reactionary protectors of the Germans are at work. But the government will not be misled or softened by any pressure, any campaigns, any libellous attacks. It is for us a decisive and encouraging fact that the Soviet Union stands by us in the question of transferring the Germans, and that Marshal Stalin himself has the greatest possible understanding for our endeavors to get rid of the Germans. We will not allow even some hundreds of thousands of Germans to remain in this country. We do not want any Germans along our north-western frontier, we want Czechoslovakia to form one integrally Slav territory with Poland and the Soviet Union.” Kopecky, the Stalinist Minister of Propaganda in the Czech cabinet, stated in a speech at Reichenberg (now “Liberec”) on July 25, 1945. And, Jan Masaryk, son of Czech founding president Tomáš Masaryk, boasted that the Czech nation was finally “over with the Germans of Czechoslovakia… There is no possible way to get us to live under the same umbrella again.”
Gablonz an der Neiße in northern Bohemia was the second largest town of the Reichenberg Region and it had for centuries a large German majority, mainly glass blowers and glass workers. After the Czech decree that all property belonging to the “German Race” be confiscated without compensation, many of the Germans who were expelled from Gablonz (now “Jablonec”) migrated near to the old Bavarian town of Kaufbeuren where they founded the township of Neugablonz.
That some Czechs, in the same manner as some Poles, Yugoslavians and others who in this manner acquired German properties, have literally buried evidence of their own complicity in the ethnic killings and expulsions while demanding blood money from the German government for themselves as restitution and reparations, is unconscionable. Regardless of whether ‘only’ 20,000 were killed in the expulsions or 250,000, the fact remains that jewish led Czechoslovaks ultimately destroyed an entire ethnic community of more than 3,000,000 civilians which, by standards involving any other ethnic group other than Germans, would constitute genocide. Budweiss and Gablonz, above.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-06-17--Statues Are Being Targeted for Spiritual Reasons

Many people seem to think that the destruction , defacement , and desecration of statues taking place across the White world right now is a somewhat new phenomenon , with purely political reasons , but it is not .
Zealots have been destroying statues for thousands of years .
They do so in order to fully conquer a people , destroy their spirit , erase history , and usher in a new way of religious thinking .
You know that when Christianity came into power it destroyed every statue it could lay its ignorant hands upon .
It defaced and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beautiful building ; it burned the manuscripts , both Greek and Latin ; it destroyed all the history , all the poetry , all the philosophy it could find , and reduced to ashes every library that it could reach with its torch .
And the result was , that the night of the Middle Ages fell upon the human race .
But by accident , by chance , by oversight , a few of the manuscripts escaped the fury of religious zeal ; and these manuscripts became the seed , the fruit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A few statues had been buried ; a few forms of beauty were dug from the earth that had protected them , and now the civilized world is filled with art , the walls are covered with paintings , and the niches filled with statuary .
A few manuscripts were found and deciphered .
The old languages were learned , and literature was again born .
A new day dawned upon mankind .
Every effort at mental improvement had been opposed by the church , and yet , the few things saved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few works of the ancient thinkers , a few forms wrought in stone .
produced a new civilization destined to overthrow and destroy the fabric of superstition .
Christians follow the same Torah as the jews and have taken to heart some of the jewish prohibitions against “ idolatry .
From Aish.com : While sculptors were busy for thousands of years honing their craft and producing works of great artistic merit , Jews took seriously the biblical prohibition important enough to be worthy of inclusion in the Decalogue .
Not only were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – for the obvious reason that one of the 13 basic principles of faith as enumerated by Maimonides is that the Almighty “ has no form of a body and is not corporeal ” – but Jews shied away from any representations of even our greatest leaders and heroes .
We have no idea what Abraham , Isaac or Jacob looked like – and no Torah observant artist ever dared to enlighten us .
It was Michelangelo who created the admittedly stunning statue of Moses that has captivated viewers for centuries .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if he were he almost certainly would ’ ve been reprimanded by the rabbis .
The Shulchan Aruch , the Code of Jewish Law , allows one to create two-dimensional paintings and images of the human body , as long as the entire body is not shown ( Yoreh Deah 141-142 ) and Rabbi Moses Isserles , known as the Rema , wrote that even a statue of man is permitted as long as it is not complete .
Today most traditional rabbinic authorities follow this ruling , sanctioning depictions of the human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sculpted bust or the armless Venus de Milo , one of most famous examples of ancient Greek sculpture .
But the full depiction of a human being is undisputedly forbidden .
Therefore most of the statues presently being protested for political reasons are objectionable because they transgress a biblical prohibition .
It is not just a drive to fulfill the will of “ God ” that motivates these destroyers , but also a belief that statues hold power , and the way to sever that power is by destroying or desecrating these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so many statues from Egypt have their noses removed , as this is a way to disconnect the spirit ( breath ) from the figure .
It appears that both Christians and radical reformers like Akhenaten took part in the desecration of Egyptian statues .
The Persians , who really introduced the world to the dualistic good vs. evil theology , were also recorded to have destroyed Egyptian artworks for religious reasons .
London J.R. Smith wrote in 1863 : The Persians , on their conquest of Egypt , in the year B.C @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Egyptians in their religious feelings , by killing the bull Apis , and by breaking to pieces the statues of the gods .
They afterwards made an earnest attempt to bring about some changes in the religion , and the chief was to abolish the worship of all statues and figures of the gods , and to introduce the more simple worship of the sun .

Many people seem to think that the destruction, defacement, and desecration of statues taking place across the White world right now is a somewhat new phenomenon, with purely political reasons, but it is not. Zealots have been destroying statues for thousands of years. They do so in order to fully conquer a people, destroy their spirit, erase history, and usher in a new way of religious thinking.
Robert Ingersoll said over 120 years ago:
You know that when Christianity came into power it destroyed every statue it could lay its ignorant hands upon. It defaced and obliterated every painting; it destroyed every beautiful building; it burned the manuscripts, both Greek and Latin; it destroyed all the history, all the poetry, all the philosophy it could find, and reduced to ashes every library that it could reach with its torch. And the result was, that the night of the Middle Ages fell upon the human race. But by accident, by chance, by oversight, a few of the manuscripts escaped the fury of religious zeal; and these manuscripts became the seed, the fruit of which is our civilization of to-day. A few statues had been buried; a few forms of beauty were dug from the earth that had protected them, and now the civilized world is filled with art, the walls are covered with paintings, and the niches filled with statuary. A few manuscripts were found and deciphered. The old languages were learned, and literature was again born. A new day dawned upon mankind. Every effort at mental improvement had been opposed by the church, and yet, the few things saved from the general wreck–a few poems, a few works of the ancient thinkers, a few forms wrought in stone. produced a new civilization destined to overthrow and destroy the fabric of superstition.
Christians follow the same Torah as the jews and have taken to heart some of the jewish prohibitions against “idolatry. From Aish.com:
While sculptors were busy for thousands of years honing their craft and producing works of great artistic merit, Jews took seriously the biblical prohibition important enough to be worthy of inclusion in the Decalogue. Not only were there no attempts to portray God himself – for the obvious reason that one of the 13 basic principles of faith as enumerated by Maimonides is that the Almighty “has no form of a body and is not corporeal” – but Jews shied away from any representations of even our greatest leaders and heroes. We have no idea what Abraham, Isaac or Jacob looked like – and no Torah observant artist ever dared to enlighten us. It was Michelangelo who created the admittedly stunning statue of Moses that has captivated viewers for centuries. But Michelangelo wasn’t Jewish, and if he were he almost certainly would’ve been reprimanded by the rabbis. The Shulchan Aruch, the Code of Jewish Law, allows one to create two-dimensional paintings and images of the human body, as long as the entire body is not shown (Yoreh Deah 141-142) and Rabbi Moses Isserles, known as the Rema, wrote that even a statue of man is permitted as long as it is not complete. Today most traditional rabbinic authorities follow this ruling, sanctioning depictions of the human body that are somehow incomplete such as a sculpted bust or the armless Venus de Milo, one of most famous examples of ancient Greek sculpture. But the full depiction of a human being is undisputedly forbidden. Therefore most of the statues presently being protested for political reasons are objectionable because they transgress a biblical prohibition.
It is not just a drive to fulfill the will of “God” that motivates these destroyers, but also a belief that statues hold power, and the way to sever that power is by destroying or desecrating these works of art. This is why so many statues from Egypt have their noses removed, as this is a way to disconnect the spirit (breath) from the figure. It appears that both Christians and radical reformers like Akhenaten took part in the desecration of Egyptian statues. The Persians, who really introduced the world to the dualistic good vs. evil theology, were also recorded to have destroyed Egyptian artworks for religious reasons. London J.R. Smith wrote in 1863:
The Persians, on their conquest of Egypt, in the year B.C. 523, began with insulting the Egyptians in their religious feelings, by killing the bull Apis, and by breaking to pieces the statues of the gods. They afterwards made an earnest attempt to bring about some changes in the religion, and the chief was to abolish the worship of all statues and figures of the gods, and to introduce the more simple worship of the sun.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-06-17--20 Million Schoolchildren Have Been Prescribed Psychiatric Drugs Known to Cause Suicidal Thoughts

A news article published in 2017 reported that , according to the latest data , a staggering 12.7 percent of all US citizens over the age of 12 were taking antidepressants .
Thrive Global , who reported these figures , stated that : In reality , more children are being prescribed these drugs than the public are aware of .
This fact was highlighted by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights ( ) in their film , Psychiatry : an Industry of Death .
They stated that currently around 20 million school children are being prescribed stimulants and psychotropic drugs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ especially when you consider that professionals worldwide have been linking the use of antidepressants to suicide , suicidal thoughts , and attempted suicide , for many years .
Studies Prove that Antidepressants Can Lead Patients to Die by Suicide In 2016 , in her article titled 7 Facts About Depression That Will Blow You Away , holistic women ’ s health psychiatrist , Kelly Brogan , M.D.
, stated that : Worryingly , Brogan highlighted the fact that the majority of prescriptions being written for antidepressants were actually being written by general practitioners @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expect .
She wrote that : In fact , according to Brogan , many individuals suffering with a physical condition can also display symptoms similar to those suffered by those patients with psychiatric disorders .
If this is correct , then young children may be diagnosed with mental illness when they are not mentally ill but physically sick .
If she is correct , then her paper is extremely worrying , as , according to research , children as young as one-year-old are being prescribed antidepressants .
In 2016 , it was reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NHS ) had been prescribing antidepressants to children for many years .
In a report written by Harry Cockburn , published by the Independent in 2016 , Cockburn stated that between January and May , the Tayside and Dundee National Health Service ( NHS ) , prescribed antidepressants to approximately 450 children under the age of 18 .
Furthermore , he continued with the extremely worrying statement that : This being said , should antidepressants be given to children under the age of 18 at all ?
Cockburn continued his article by revealing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discovered , we decided to ask leading child psychiatrist Dr. Sami Timimi what he believed was happening to our children .
Dr. Timimi is a Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist and Director of Medical Education in the National Health Service in Lincolnshire , Training Programme Director for East Midlands Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , and a Visiting Professor of Child Psychiatry and Mental Health Improvement at the University of Lincoln , UK .
In an exclusive interview , we asked Dr. Timimi whether or not he believed that young children should be prescribed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asked him whether or not there was a known link between antidepressants and suicide ?
He told us that : We asked him if , over the years , he had noticed a rise in the number of children being labelled as mentally ill. We asked him if he believed that too many children were being labelled as mentally ill .
Finally , we asked him what he believed were the alternatives to prescription drugs .
Given the fact that , according to Dr. Timimi and many others , there are many alternative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients before prescribing them antidepressants .
We need to ask ourselves why so many young children are being prescribed these drugs in the first place , especially since research indicates that they can cause some children to have suicidal thoughts .
Latest Research Once Again Links Antidepressants to Suicide In 2018 , S.Stübner et al , conducted a study carefully analysing paperwork collected from 81 psychiatric hospitals during the period from 1993 – 2014 .
The team documented all single cases of suicidal ideations or behavior that had been judged as adverse drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statistics could be seen by many to be somewhat limited , the team concluded that “ their findings supported the view that antidepressant drugs can , in rare cases trigger suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour.
” We believe that these statistics are extremely worrying , especially when you consider the fact that children as young one are being prescribed antidepressants .
However , according to evidence that we have uncovered , these links appear to have been known for many years , because , according to a special report published in 2006 by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FDA now require the manufacturers of antidepressants to highlight the potential risk of increased suicidality in children on their labels .
He stated that : Furthermore , in his report , which highlights the lengths that drug companies can go to conceal crucial evidence from the public , Breggin explained in detail how , after being asked to give evidence in a trial concerning the widely used antidepressant Paxil , he was “ empowered by the court to examine hundreds of cartons of drug company files contained in GlaxoSmith Klines ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He concluded his report by adding several sections of his full report , which he has stated , can be found on his website .
He stated that the sections that he had added to this report focused largely on Paxil-induced suicidality in adults .
Having read this report and his evidence , plus the evidence that we have highlighted in this article , leads us to conclude that too many young children are being prescribed dangerous , mind-altering drugs before their problems have been fully investigated .
For further research please read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Antidepressants and Other Psychotropic Drugs—

A news article published in 2017 reported that, according to the latest data, a staggering 12.7 percent of all US citizens over the age of 12 were taking antidepressants. Thrive Global, who reported these figures, stated that:
For many, antidepressants have been a long-term course of medication: 68 percent of people in the most recent survey said they’d been taking them for two or more years, and 25 percent had been taking them for more than a decade.”
In reality, more children are being prescribed these drugs than the public are aware of. This fact was highlighted by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights ( CCHR ) in their film, Psychiatry: an Industry of Death. They stated that currently around 20 million school children are being prescribed stimulants and psychotropic drugs.
https://www.cchr.org/videos/psychiatry-an-industry-of-death/introduction.html
This information is extremely worrying, especially when you consider that professionals worldwide have been linking the use of antidepressants to suicide, suicidal thoughts, and attempted suicide, for many years.
Studies Prove that Antidepressants Can Lead Patients to Die by Suicide
In 2016, in her article titled 7 Facts About Depression That Will Blow You Away, holistic women’s health psychiatrist, Kelly Brogan, M.D., stated that:
Despite what you’ve been led to believe, antidepressants have repeatedly been shown in long-term scientific studies to worsen the course of mental illness—to say nothing of the risks of liver damage, bleeding, weight gain, sexual dysfunction, and reduced cognitive function they entail. The dirtiest little secret of all is the fact that antidepressants are among the most difficult drugs to taper from, more so than alcohol and opiates. While you might call it “going through withdrawal,” we medical professionals have been instructed to call it “discontinuation syndrome,” which can be characterized by fiercely debilitating physical and psychological reactions. Moreover, antidepressants have a well-established history of causing violent side effects, including suicide and homicide. In fact, five of the top 10 most violence-inducing drugs have been found to be antidepressants.” (Emphasis added)
Worryingly, Brogan highlighted the fact that the majority of prescriptions being written for antidepressants were actually being written by general practitioners and not psychiatrists, as one would expect. She wrote that:
Seven percent of all visits to a primary care doctor end with an antidepressant and almost three-quarters of the prescriptions are written without a specific diagnosis. What’s more, when the Department of Mental Health at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health did its own examination into the prevalence of mental disorders, it found that most people who take antidepressants never meet the medical criteria for a bona fide diagnosis of major depression, and many who are given antidepressants for things like OCD, panic disorder, social phobia, and anxiety also don’t qualify as actually having these conditions.” (Emphasis added)
In fact, according to Brogan, many individuals suffering with a physical condition can also display symptoms similar to those suffered by those patients with psychiatric disorders. If this is correct, then young children may be diagnosed with mental illness when they are not mentally ill but physically sick.
She stated that:
Many different physical conditions create psychiatric symptoms but aren’t themselves “psychiatric.” Two prime examples: dysfunctioning thyroid and blood sugar chaos. We think (because our doctors think) that we need to “cure” the brain, but in reality we need to look at the whole body’s ecosystem: intestinal health, hormonal interactions, the immune system and autoimmune disorders, blood sugar balance, and toxicant exposure.” (Emphasis added)
Brogan concluded that:
Depression is a message and an opportunity It’s a sign for us to stop and figure out what’s causing our imbalance rather than just masking, suppressing, or rerouting the symptoms. It’s a chance to choose a new story, to engage in radical transformation, to say yes to a different life experience.”
If she is correct, then her paper is extremely worrying, as, according to research, children as young as one-year-old are being prescribed antidepressants.
One-Year-Old Prescribed Antidepressants
In 2016, it was reported that the Scottish National Health Service (NHS) had been prescribing antidepressants to children for many years.
In a report written by Harry Cockburn, published by the Independent in 2016, Cockburn stated that between January and May, the Tayside and Dundee National Health Service (NHS), prescribed antidepressants to approximately 450 children under the age of 18.
Furthermore, he continued with the extremely worrying statement that:
In 2014, the trust prescribed antidepressants to a one-year-old boy, according to figures obtained by the Dundee Evening Telegraph.” (Emphasis added)
Cockburn also stated that:
A spokesperson for NHS Tayside told the Evening Telegraph the drugs could be used to treat a number of different conditions beyond their most common use as a treatment for clinical depression.”
This being said, should antidepressants be given to children under the age of 18 at all? Cockburn continued his article by revealing that:
In January this year, the largest ever review of clinical study reports compiled by drug companies found teenagers were twice as likely to commit suicide if they were taking antidepressants.”
Concerned by what we had discovered, we decided to ask leading child psychiatrist Dr. Sami Timimi what he believed was happening to our children.
Dr. Timimi is a Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist and Director of Medical Education in the National Health Service in Lincolnshire, Training Programme Director for East Midlands Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and a Visiting Professor of Child Psychiatry and Mental Health Improvement at the University of Lincoln, UK.
In an exclusive interview, we asked Dr. Timimi whether or not he believed that young children should be prescribed antidepressants.
He replied:
I believe that they should not. Doctors prescribe them because they can and we deal with difficult situations, but this leads to massive overprescribing and creation of long-term patients on medications that, according to the research, have little to no advantage over a sugar pill (placebo) but come with a range of side effects and withdrawal problems.”
Given his reply, we asked him whether or not there was a known link between antidepressants and suicide?
He told us that:
You are about twice as likely to experience suicidal impulses and behaviours if you are prescribed an ‘antidepressants’ compared to placebo in under 18s.”
We asked him if, over the years, he had noticed a rise in the number of children being labelled as mentally ill.
He replied:
Yes, and it has accelerated in the last ten years or so (possibly in connection with post financial crash austerity putting greater pressures on families and schools and therefore young people).”
We asked him if he believed that too many children were being labelled as mentally ill.
He replied:
I reject the notion that what they have is a mental illness/disorder, as most of what we call this is simply understandable reactions to life events and family circumstances. No one has demonstrated that any neurological or genetic abnormalities are connected with any of the so-called diagnoses we make. I think this is an unhelpful way of thinking about distress or behavioural difference, as it assumes something is wrong with the internal working of the child, and often, by accident, leads to creating more long-term patients. To make progress in how we help those who experience mental distress/behavioural difference as youngsters, we must first dispense with unscientific notions such as psychiatric diagnosis/disorders.”
Finally, we asked him what he believed were the alternatives to prescription drugs.
He replied that:
Everything else you can think of, from the variety of therapies (family, group, systemic, individual) to lifestyle (diet, exercise etc.), to focus on routines and social functioning, to everyday stuff like hobbies and spending more time with friends, etc.”
Given the fact that, according to Dr. Timimi and many others, there are many alternative therapies that professionals could be offering their patients before prescribing them antidepressants. We need to ask ourselves why so many young children are being prescribed these drugs in the first place, especially since research indicates that they can cause some children to have suicidal thoughts.
Latest Research Once Again Links Antidepressants to Suicide
In 2018, S.Stübner et al, conducted a study carefully analysing paperwork collected from 81 psychiatric hospitals during the period from 1993 – 2014. The team documented all single cases of suicidal ideations or behavior that had been judged as adverse drug reactions to antidepressant drugs.
They stated that:
Among 219,635 adult hospitalized patients taking antidepressant drugs under surveillance, 83 cases of suicidal adverse drug reactions occurred (0.04%): 44 cases of suicidal ideation, 34 attempted suicides, and 5 committed suicides were documented. Restlessness was present in 42 patients, ego-dystonic intrusive suicidal thoughts or urges in 39 patients, impulsiveness in 22 patients, and psychosis in 7 patients. Almost all adverse drug reactions occurred shortly after beginning antidepressant drug medication or increasing the dosage. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors caused a higher incidence of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior as adverse drug reactions than noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants or tricyclic antidepressants, as did monotherapy consisting of one antidepressant drug, compared to combination treatments.”
Although their statistics could be seen by many to be somewhat limited, the team concluded that “their findings supported the view that antidepressant drugs can, in rare cases trigger suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour.”
The team stated that:
… Special clinical features (restlessness, ego-dystonic thoughts or urges, impulsiveness) may be considered as possible warning signs. A combination therapy might be preferable to antidepressant drug monotherapy when beginning treatment.”
We believe that these statistics are extremely worrying, especially when you consider the fact that children as young one are being prescribed antidepressants.
However, according to evidence that we have uncovered, these links appear to have been known for many years, because, according to a special report published in 2006 by medical expert Dr. Peter R. Breggin, the FDA now require the manufacturers of antidepressants to highlight the potential risk of increased suicidality in children on their labels. He stated that:
As of 2005, the FDA now require the drug manufacturers to place elaborate warnings on their labels concerning the potential of these drugs to cause stimulating effects, including agitation, anxiety, irritability, emotional lability, aggression, hostility, and mania. The labels must also include a warning about increased suicidality in children.”
Furthermore, in his report, which highlights the lengths that drug companies can go to conceal crucial evidence from the public, Breggin explained in detail how, after being asked to give evidence in a trial concerning the widely used antidepressant Paxil, he was “empowered by the court to examine hundreds of cartons of drug company files contained in GlaxoSmith Klines’s sealed record room.” He wrote:
These files included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) correspondence and all of the company’s worldwide clinical trials and adverse drug reports for Paxil. On July 21, 2001, my report in the form of an affidavit was sent to the judicial arbitrator in the case. It addressed GSK’s practices in the development and marketing of Paxil, and in particular its alleged withholding or manipulation of information about the drug’s dangerousness. Based on GSK’s proprietary files that have to this day never been made public, my report examined many factors, including (a) how quickly after the first dose can Paxil cause severe adverse reactions; (b) the actual rates of akathisia; (c) the actual risk of overstimulation causing agitation, irritability, and manic-like symptoms; (d) the actual rates of suicidality in adults; and (e) promotional claims made for the drug.”
He stated that:
The case against GSK was eventually “resolved” to the satisfaction of GSK and the Lacuzong family. GSK denied and continues to deny all of the allegations of negligence in developing and marketing Paxil. My impression is that a substantial amount of money was involved in the resolution of the case, although the amount was not disclosed. GSK at that time refused to unseal its records or to allow me to make public my findings, regardless of their significance for the FDA, medical profession, and public health.” (Emphasis added)
He concluded his report by adding several sections of his full report, which he has stated, can be found on his website. He stated that the sections that he had added to this report focused largely on Paxil-induced suicidality in adults.
Having read this report and his evidence, plus the evidence that we have highlighted in this article, leads us to conclude that too many young children are being prescribed dangerous, mind-altering drugs before their problems have been fully investigated.
For further research please read:
Psychiatric Drug Facts by Peter R. Breggin M.D. https://breggin.com/
CCHR: Exposing the Dangers of Antidepressants and Other Psychotropic Drugs—
Despite FDA/Psychiatric- Pharmaceutical Cover-Ups
Vested Interests Inventing “Chemical Imbalance” Theory to Sell Drugs https://files.ondemandhosting.info/data/www.cchr.org/files/Exposing_the_Dangers_of_Antidepressants_Despite_Cover-Ups.pdf
Seroxat Secrets https://seroxatsecrets.wordpress.com/