renegadetribune--2020-05-04--The Four Million Figure of Auschwitz: Origin, Revisions and Consequences – Part 1 & 2

I .
Thrust to the Roots of Soviet Propaganda • The Origin of the Propaganda Figure of Four Million The propaganda story of the alleged four million Auschwitz victims appeared first in the Pravda of May 7 , 1945 , as is generally known , and it received its official blessing at the Nuremberg trial during the court session on February 19 , 1946 , thanks to the Soviet prosecutor Smirnow .
But far less known is the origin of this story .
Within the framework of the investigations in Auschwitz between February 14 and March 8 , 1945 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ engineers , the Polish citizen Dawidowski and the Soviet citizens Dolinski , Lavrushins and Shuer , prepared an expert report about the “ gas chambers ” and crematoria of Auschwitz-Birkenau .
In it is a short “ Appendix 1 ” with the title “ Calculations for determining the Number of Persons liquidated by the Germans in the Camp Auschwitz ” .
On these three pages we find the genesis of the four million number .
The “ expert report ” starts with the following premises : “ Based on the investigated material it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by carefully removing the traces of their crimes and misdeeds , destroyed all documents which would have made it possible to determine more or less accurately the number murdered by Hitler ’ s butchers in the camp .
Thus , the Germans removed , as an example , the documentation about the arrival of railroad transports carrying people ; they destroyed the documentation about the quantities of women ’ s hair , eye glasses and dresses , as well as other evidence , which would have made it possible to determine , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of persons that perished in this camp .
Nevertheless , we think that it is possible to perform a calculation which would permit us to determine the order of magnitude of the extermination of camp inmates by the Germans.
” Because they didn ’ t have any documents , the Polish-Soviet ‘ experts ’ used a completely unreliable method of calculation – the counting of the cremated corpses in the crematoria of Auschwitz – and made additionally grotesque exaggerations .
First they divided the time of operation of these installations into three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the crematorium and the gas chambers 1 and 2 were in operation as well as the pyres located next to them .
During the second period the crematoria II , III , IV and V [ were in operation ] .
During the third period the crematoria II , III , IV and V as well as the gas chamber 2 and the pyres next to it [ were in operation ] .
” All calculations about the cremations in ovens are based on the presumption that 9,000 corpses per month were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crematoria of Birkenau had the following monthly cremation capacities : This cremation capacity corresponds to 9,000 corpses daily ( 3,000 each for crematorium II and III , 1,500 each daily for crematorium IV and V ) and is in reality eight times higher than the theoretical maximum capacity of these installations !
The ‘ experts ’ inexplicably determined a capacity for crematorium I which is exaggerated by a factor of only two .
From this it follows that the alleged hourly cremation capacity of a two-muffle oven ( two corpses per hour ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a three-muffle oven as well as an eight-muffle oven ( eight corpses per hour ) .
This is absurd , because the two-muffle ovens were not only not inferior to the ovens of Birkenau , but actually superior .
The ‘ experts ’ calculated the number of the cremated bodies during the third period based on the following factors : 270,000 = monthly number of cremations in the crematoria of Birkenau ; 6 = Number of months the crematoria were in operation ; For the second period of thirteen months the ‘ experts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so that their calculation appears as follows : ( 270,000 × 13 ) × 0.5 = 1,755,000 corpses ; this number is rounded down to 1,750,000 .
Also for the first period of fourteen months , during which only the crematorium I was in operation , the ‘ experts ’ decided an utilization factor of 0.5 and came thus to : Accordingly the total number of corpses cremated in the crematoria as per commission during these three periods amounted to 3,263,000 .
For the “ gas chamber 2 ” , the so-called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supposed to be in operation for six months during the third period , the ‘ experts ’ determined a daily killing capacity of 3,000 people , or 90,000 per month .
They assumed an utilization factor of 0.5 , which according to them will result in a the total number of the murdered in that location of According to the ‘ experts , ’ the “ gas chamber 1 , ” i.e.
, the so-called ‘ Bunker 1 , ’ was in operation during the first period for fourteen months and had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 150,000 per month .
Using a utilization factor of 0.25 the ‘ experts ’ therefore calculated ( 150,000 × 14 ) × 0.25 = 525,000 dead .
Under these presuppositions , the number of gassed in both ‘ bunkers ’ and then on pyres cremated would have resulted in 795,000 .
Adding this number to the murdered and cremated in the crematoria results in a number of 4,058,000 , which was rounded off by the ‘ experts ’ to 4,000,000 .
• The Arrangements between ‘ Experts ’ and ‘ Witnesses ’ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ words about the evidently outrageous character of this statistical method , which is based on gigantic exaggerations of the cremation capacity as well as on totally arbitrary utilization coefficients .
It has to be emphasized that the testimonies of ‘ eyewitnesses ’ fit seamlessly into the framework of propaganda claims .
This ‘ expert report ’ as well as the ‘ eyewitness reports ’ support each other , which suggests that the witnesses were without any doubt instructed by the ‘ experts ’ before they made their statements .
It is a fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ witnesses as well as the ‘ experts ’ made intrinsically incorrect statements .
I am thinking primarily about the capacity of the crematoria as postulated by both .
Henryk Tauber , plainly the key witness , was questioned by the Soviets on February 27 and 28 , 1945 .
He maintained that the two-muffle ovens of crematorium I operated at a muffle temperature between 1,200 to 1,500 degrees Celsius , which is absolutely absurd .
He further testified that within 20 to 25 minutes four to five corpses were cremated in one muffle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crematoria II and III – technically an impossibility .
Finally , he testified that in the crematoria II and III 3,000 corpses were cremated per day , which corresponds exactly to the number as stated by the Polish-Soviet ‘ experts ’ .
A coincidence ?
Certainly not , because the statements with regards to the functioning of the cremation ovens as made by Tauber and the ‘ experts ’ are practically identical .
The ‘ experts ’ started from the hypothesis that three to five corpses were cremated in the three-muffle ovens at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 30 minutes , and in an eight-muffle oven the cremation of a corresponding number of corpses lasted 30 to 40 minutes .
Any engineer , even having only a cursory knowledge of thermo-dynamics , would laugh at such nonsense .
The Polish-Soviet engineers , however , maintained with all their know-how that their statements were of scientific value !
Any engineer with basic thermo-dynamic knowledge would dismiss as incompetent any witness coming up with such silliness , but the Polish-Soviet engineers were primarily the willing tools of Soviet propaganda , and at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fashion .
The Soviet-Polish commission , which inspected Majdanek in August 1944 , ‘ calculated ’ a number of 1,380,000 victims for that camp ; but in May of 1945 , it was necessary that Auschwitz should horrify the world , and for this a number of victims was needed that would exceed the one claimed for Majdanek – four million to be exact !
Half a year earlier , in August 1944 , other Soviet ‘ experts ’ , the engineers Krause , Telyaner , and Grigorev , prepared an ‘ expert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concentration camp Majdanek , which were constructed by the company H. Kori .
In this report , among others a “ schematic diagram for the determination of the cremation time of the corpses in different cremation ovens at different temperatures ” was included .
According to its authors , this diagram was based on operating temperatures measured for civilian ovens of the models Klingenstierna , Siemens , and Schneider .
According to this , the cremation time at an operating temperature of 800°C was two hours , which is not below but actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the diagram , the cremation of a corpse at an operating temperature of 1000°C – the temperature at those gigantic “ hot air cremation ovens ” – lasted 60 minutes , at 1200°C 50 minutes , at 1300°C 45 minutes , at 1400°C 30 minutes , and at 1500°C 15 minutes .
The temperature inside the muffle of ovens for civilians could actually reach only a maximum of 1100°C , and this for a few minutes only .
Engineer Richard Kessler , one of the best-known German specialists in the area of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Operating temperatures of 1200 to 1500ºC , as they are frequently mentioned in reports about the operation of crematoria , [ … ] are probably only erroneously estimated but not measured temperatures .
At these temperatures , the bones and the fireclay soften and weld together .
The most practical operating temperatures lie between 850 and 900ºC , according to tests in Dessau.
” It is therefore clear that the Soviet ‘ specialists ’ who dealt with Auschwitz based their absurdly short cremation times of Topf ovens of 20 to 40 minutes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such cremation times could be reached at temperatures between 1200 and 1500°C .
From this it follows easily that Henryk Tauber ’ s depositions , claiming that the ovens had an operating temperature between 1200 to 1500°C , were nothing else than the attempt to explain the claimed , impossibly short cremation times .
The only logical conclusion is that these temperatures – as well as the alleged cremation times – were directly or indirectly given to Tauber by the ‘ experts ’ themselves !
Later , on May 24 , 1945 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these questions ) , when questioned by the Polish judge Jan Sehn , testified that the operating temperature of the ovens was between 1000 to 1200 degrees Celsius , but maintained his untenable assertions about the cremation capacity and expressively mentioned the Soviet figure of four million victims !
Tauber did not even understand that he contradicted himself with this , because according to the diagram mentioned , the cremation of a corpse at these temperatures lasts an average of 75 minutes !
• The Reason and Meaning of Franciszek Piper ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ propaganda figure of four million Auschwitz victims , as propagated by the Soviets , was chiselled into the memorial plaques , which were erected not far from crematoria II and III of Birkenau as an ‘ eternal ’ warning for posterity .
Until 1990 , the plaques announced that four million people were murdered there by the “ Nazis.
” In that year – the Soviet system had just collapsed – the Auschwitz museum undertook a revision of the number of victims : Franciszek Piper , head of the historical department of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 1.5 million .
Following this , the inscriptions on the memorial plaques were removed .
Several years later , new plaques with the following text were installed : “ May this place be a cry of despair and a warning to mankind .
Here the ‘ Nazis ’ murdered about one and a half million men , women and children .
Most of them were jews from different countries of Europe .
Auschwitz-Birkenau 1940-1945.
” In 1991 , F. Piper wrote a long article about the number of victims of the camp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of another detailed study ; in this article , he no longer spoke of 1,500,000 , but only of 1,100,000 dead .
In the following year , this study was indeed published in the form of a small book , and again two years later , in 1993 , Piper published the ‘ definite ’ version of his study under the title The Number of Victims in Auschwitz .
On what fragile foundation this new figure of 1.1 million is based and to what new revisions it was subjected during the last decade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was it possible that the Soviet propaganda figure of four million could stay valid in Auschwitz itself up to the year 1990 ?
F. Piper wrote about this as follows : “ The number of four million victims was spread in the literature by Jan Sehn , who in 1945 and 1946 was head of the Polish commission for the investigation of crimes in Auschwitz .
This number was mentioned in many publications in Poland ( Auschwitz State Museum , Main Commission for the Investigation of ‘ Nazi ’ Crimes in Poland ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ former communist East Germany ] .
However , this number of three to four million did not find greater resonance in publications of the West , regardless of the known testimony of Höß in Nuremberg .
One of the first researchers who questioned this high , estimated number of victims in Auschwitz was the British historian Gerald Reitlinger .
In his elaborate study on the destruction of the jews during World War II , he wrote that in Auschwitz ‘ considerably less than a million people ’ died ; of these about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ murdered immediately after their arrival at the camp , and an unknown number of about 300,000 registered prisoners , who were no longer there on the day of liberation ; the majority of them were jews.
” In reality , the propaganda figure of four million had been dictated by the Soviets and was maintained by the communist world for pure self-interest .
The West , however , generally accepted the lapidary judgment of G. Reitlinger : “ The world became suspicious about such ‘ estimates , ’ and the round figure of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ examination.
” The Polish judge Jan Sehn was actually more Soviet than the Soviets themselves : In the known summary of conclusions of his investigation of the year 1946 , which became the foundation of the indictment against Rudolf Höß the following year , he wrote of even five million victims ( “ pięciu milionów “ ) !
• None Sehn knew very well that the Soviet four million figure was an obvious lie .
During his investigations prior to the Höß trial , he thoroughly reviewed the so-called transport lists .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prepared secretly by inmates who were employed by the political department of the camp .
In one protocol dated “ Cracow , December 16 , 1945 ” , Sehn transcribed and analyzed these lists ; they included : • None 2,377 transports with male prisoners arrived between May 20 , 1940 , and September 18 , 1944 .
The arrivals were assigned the registration numbers 1-199,531 .
• None 1,046 transports with female prisoners arrived between February 26 , 1942 , and March 26 , 1944 .
These prisoners received the numbers 1-75,697 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12 and August 1944 ( registration numbers A-1/A-20,000 ) .
• None 60 transports with male jews arrived between July 31 and September 21 , 1944 , ordered by the RSHA ( registration numbers B-1/B-10,481 ) .
• None 90 transports with female jews arrived between May 15 and September 20 , 1944 , ordered by the RSHA ( registration numbers A-1/A-25,378 ) .
• None 171 transports with prisoners for re-education arrived between October 21 , 1941 , and September 20 , 1944 ( registration numbers E/1/E-9,339 ) .
Although these lists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to determine roughly the order of magnitude of prisoners that arrived in Auschwitz .
In fact , they also serve as the basis for the Auschwitz Chronicle by Danuta Czech published in the German language between 1959 and 1964 .
As is generally known , the “ French ” -jewish historian Georges Wellers wrote an article in 1983 about the number of victims of Auschwitz , which is also based on the study by D. Czech .
Wellers came to the conclusion that 1,613,455 people were deported to Auschwitz , of which 1,334,700 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ full of mistakes ( which I pointed out in a separate study ) , his writing dealt a deathblow to the four million fairy tale .
Why did the Auschwitz-Museum defend the four million figure until 1990 , although the study , which formed the basis for their revision , existed since 1964 ?
F. Piper gave the following explanation : “ The state-run Auschwitz museum in Oświęcim [ Polish name of Auschwitz ] started relatively late in the seventies to research the problem of the number of victims .
At that time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results and neither confirmed nor questioned the numbers of the Soviet and Polish investigating authorities.
” As already noted , this is completely wrong , because the primary instrument of the propagandistic four million figure – D. Czech ’ s Kalendarium – was created by the Auschwitz-Museum itself , and this refutes that figure categorically , as G. Wellers proved later , regardless of his own mistakes .
And although the Kalendarium , as already mentioned , existed since 1964 , F. Piper wrote the following in 1978 in a French book , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published by the Auschwitz museum addressing the general history of the camp ( chapter “ extermination ” ) : “ In the barely five years of the existence of the camp , about 4,000,000 people perished as the consequence of diseases and executions as well as from mass murders in the gas chambers.
” • None Piper states that he started working on the number of victims of Auschwitz in 1980 and came to preliminary conclusions in 1986 , but can one seriously believe that a researcher , who has been employed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since 1965 and is its manager today , took the Soviet four-million legend at face value ?
Should this really be the case , it would be proof of a tragic blindness , unworthy of a history researcher .
But if it is not so , as I assume , then it is proof of indecent political and ideological opportunism , also not befitting of a history researcher .
It should also be mentioned that the so-called memoirs of the first Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höß were first published in Poland , and that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ half million victims ; he claims that Eichmann gave him this figure .
Höß lists the “ largest actions ” , from which a total of 1,130,000 deportees derives ; this would have been one more reason for the Auschwitz museum as well as F. Piper to check the four million figure .
In 1990 , after the collapse of the communist regime in Poland , F. Piper made use of the favorable hour to ban the thoroughly discredited old figure into history ’ s scrap heap : he pretends now to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a major revision and therefore deserves the attention of the historians !
• The Consequences of Giving Up the Propaganda Figure of Four Million Whoever thinks that the propaganda figure of four million can be dropped without punishment deceives himself completely .
This figure is closely connected with the thesis of mass extermination in Auschwitz and can not be thrown overboard without bringing the whole artificial building into sway .
Regardless of the futile efforts of Jean-Claude Pressac to prove this thesis of mass extermination by documents , it is up to this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eye witnesses , and Pressac himself had to make use of those when he tried to describe the first alleged homicidal gassing in crematorium II of Birkenau .
As already said , the witness testimonies and the four million figure were intimately woven together right from the start , in a way that the refutation of the witness testimonies would have been equivalent to a refutation of this figure and vice versa ; at the same time , the entire thesis of mass extermination in Auschwitz would become untenable .
Today , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the table , the official history has in fact taken this irreversible path to refute the orthodox Auschwitz version .
The investigation of the actual capacity of the cremation ovens of Auschwitz causes the inevitable breakdown of the thesis of mass extermination of human beings in Auschwitz , because the most important witnesses , whose testimonies are necessary to support this thesis , have in the meantime been exposed as vulgar deceivers .
Without fear of refutation , it can be said today that not a single one of the key witnesses – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” – ever told the truth about the cremation ovens ; they all lied shamelessly without exception .
They lied in order to reinforce the thesis of mass extermination .
But if they lied in this key point , then what credibility can their testimonies have regarding the ‘ gassings ’ of humans ?
An honest dispute of this question has to result necessarily in a radical reduction of the number of people allegedly ‘ gassed , ’ and the article published by Fritjof Meyer in the spring of 2002 , further reducing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a writing on the wall for the official historiography .
This is of course only valid for those researchers who posses a minimum of honesty and critical spirit , and certainly not for the Auschwitz-museum : although its historians have abandoned the four million figure , they still quote the thermo-dynamically ridiculous testimonies of ‘ eye witnesses ’ as serious sources and could not care less about the obvious contradictions resulting from this .
In this sense , F. Piper was not ashamed to write the following as late as 1994 : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Office to Group C of June 24 , 1943 , states that the capacity of crematorium I was 340 bodies , 1,440 each for crematoria II and III as well as 768 each for crematoria IV and V. Thus , the five crematoria could cremate 4,765 bodies daily .
This estimate agrees with the descriptions of the capacity of a five muffle crematorium for POW ’ s , according to which two bodies could be cremated within 30 minutes .
However , crematorium I was shut down in the following month , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their attempt to increase the cremation capacity of the ovens , the camp administration recommended to cut down the cremation time to 20 minutes and to triple the number of corpses , depending on the size of the bodies .
As a result , the capacity of the crematoria could almost be doubled and went up to 8,000 corpses within 24 hours , as an inmate of the Sonderkommando , Feinsilber , testifies.
” Thus this ‘ critical spirit ’ of the Auschwitz museum , who reduced the number of victims of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ invented a cremation capacity , which was eight times above the actual capacity !
F. Piper of course knows exactly that the credibility of his ‘ eyewitnesses ’ goes down the drain if he would state the true capacity of the ovens , and this would also render all the allegations about homicidal gassings from these same witnesses untrustworthy .
This is the reason why the Auschwitz museum is and continues to be an authority on superstition and prefers fairy tales of ‘ eyewitnesses ’ over science .
II .
Franciszek Piper and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the previous chapter “ Thrust to the Roots of Soviet Propaganda ” I described how Franciszek Piper , head of the history department at the Auschwitz Museum , let himself always be guided by political and ideological opportunism .
During the time of the communist regime he accepted the four million figure faithfully and blindly according to the party instructions , but as soon as the regime broke down he freed himself from the rubble of the Soviet propaganda and published a pretentious ‘ scientific ’ piece with the title The Number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ highly regarded by official historians .
In the following article I shall show what its real value is .
Piper investigates the extent of the jewish transportations to Auschwitz from the various countries and summarizes the results in tables , in which he enumerates the corresponding transports ( p. 182-198 ) .
On page 199 he then represents the final result of his summaries .
In this section the veracity of these conclusions will be checked in detail .
Number of deportees : 438,000 ( p. 182 and 199 ) .
A total @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country between May and July 1944 ; of these , however , at the most 398,400 arrived in Auschwitz according to current knowledge .
Therefore , the number quoted by F. Piper is too high by 39,600 .
Number of deportees : 300,000 ( p. 183-186 and 199 ) .
F. Piper notes for the time from May to August 1942 the following – allegedly all gassed – transports from Polish ghettos : These transports are pure inventions ; there is not the trace of an indication of these in the existing documentation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Czech can not furnish the slightest proof for the reality of these transports .
The transports marked by me with a “ G ” are mentioned in the well-known Atlas of the “ British ” -jewish historian Martin Gilbert , a study without any sources , which therefore has no historical value at all , because it is impossible to separate reality from fantasy .
Information about the alleged transport of 1000 jews from Grodno in November 1942 ( Piper does not give the exact date ) , supposedly all gassed right after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Czech ’ s Kalendarium ; the same is true for the transport of 1000 jews from Bialystok of November 8 , 1942 .
For both transports D. Czech quotes the diary of Dr. Johannes Kremer as a source : “ This is the 12th Sonderaktion , in which Dr. Kremer participates .
( Auschwitz in den Augen der SS , op .
cit .
Diary Kremers , p. 232 ) .
” “ This is the 13th Sonderaktion , in which Dr. Kremer participates .
( Auschwitz in den Augen der SS , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ p. 232 ) .
” However , the source quoted by D. Czech refutes her own claim : the corresponding part from Dr. Kremer ’ s diary as printed in the 1997 edition of Auschwitz in den Augen der SS actually read as follows : “ November 8 , 1942 .
Participated tonight in 2 Sonderaktionen in rainy gray fall weather ( 12. and 13 . )
” Dr. Kremer neither mentions the arrival of those two transports nor the number of admissions , and both cases are therefore pure inventions by D. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well as Danuta Czech explain themselves ( ! )
: “ jews from the concentration camp Lublin ( Majdanek ) arrived .
25 men were assigned as inmates to the camp ; the others ( number unknown ) were gassed ” .
In other words : D. Czech never had in her possession any proof for the arrival of the two mentioned transports in Auschwitz , and therefore these are to be categorized as pure inventions .
The same is true for the transport of 2,500 jews from Chrzanów on February 18 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quotes Gilbert ’ s Atlas .
The transport with 4,000 jews from Łomża of January 14 , 1943 is not even listed in D. Czech ’ s Kalendarium .
The same for the transports with 1,000 jews from Czestochowa on June 25 , 1943 , with 5,000 jews from Tarnów on September 2 , 1943 , with 3,500 jews from Przemyśl on September 2 , 1943 , with 1,000 jews from Rzeszów in November 1943 , with 600 jews from Borysław on March 28 , 1844 , as well as finally with 700 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1944 .
Thus , the second group of transports comprises a further 20,300 fictitious deportees .
An even more characteristic example for F. Piper ’ s methods is the case of Lodz .
The subtotal of his table about transports of “ Polish ” jews to Auschwitz is 225,464 deportees .
This table lists , among others , 11 transports from the ghetto of Lodz , to which F. Piper assigns an – incomplete – number of 4,818 deportees .
He then adds further 55,000 to 65,000 jews sent to Auschwitz from this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrives thus at the already mentioned total number of 300,000 jewish deportees who arrived from Poland .
However , subtracting the subtotal from the overall total results in ( 300,000 – 225,464 = ) 74,536 deportees .
To these the 4,818 , which were already included in the table , have to be added , which results in 79,354 jews who were sent to Auschwitz from Lodz , but Piper specifies their number between 60,000 to 70,000 , so that the resulting number from his table is 9,354 higher than the maximum number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not decisive ; the reality actually looks quite different .
As I described in my article “ The Evacuation of the Ghettos of Lodz and the Deportations to Auschwitz ( August 1944 ) ” , the number of the jews sent from Lodz to Auschwitz is approximately 22,5000 , which shows that F. Piper pulled a further 56,854 deportees out of his hat .
In summary , the number of the Piper ’ s fictitious jewish arrivals from Poland is therefore ( 35,130 + 20,300 + 56,854 = ) about 112,300 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the known documentation of Serge Klarsfeld , in which the number of the “ French ” jews deported to Auschwitz is listed as 68,921 .
However , F. Piper did not consider the jews , which were selected in Kosel , whose number according to Klarsfeld was between 3,056 and 4,000 ( so we can use a average of 3,500 ) .
Therefore the number of jews who arrived in Auschwitz is about ( 68,921 – 3,500 ) = ) 65,400 , and the number listed by Piper is too high by ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Number of deportees : 60,085 ( rounded to 60,000 ) ( p .
189f. )
.
In this case as well , Piper ignores the jews who were sorted out in Kosel , numbered by the Dutch Red Cross at 3,540 .
Number of deportees : 54,533 ( rounded to 55,000 ) ( p. 191 an 199 ) .
In the corresponding table , a transport with 2,500 jews is listed , which arrived on August 16 , 1944 , from the Island Rhodos .
But the same transport also appears in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ date of arrival is here July 23 , 1944 , and the number of deportees is listed as 1,805 .
As the Italian historian Liliana Picciotto Fargion explains , a transport with 1,820 “ Italian ” jews left the Dodekanes ( Rhodos and Koo ) on July 23 , 1944 , made an intermediate stop in Athens on August 3 , and arrived in Auschwitz on August 16 .
F. Piper counts it , as we have seen , twice and gives a different number in each case .
This transport has to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that time those islands were Italian territory , and the number of deported jews from Greece has to be reduced by 2,500 .
Number of deportees : 46,099 ( rounded to 46,000 ) ( p. 192 ) .
According to the memorial book of the ghetto Theresienstadt , 43,454 jews were transferred to Auschwitz between 1942 and 1944 , so that Piper ’ s number is too high by approximately 3,400 .
Number of the deportees : 10,000 ( p. 196 and 199 ) .
For the transports from Zagreb on May 7 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counts a total of 4,000 deportees , while D. Czech tallies these to 2,000 .
This means that F. Piper had 2,000 deportees up his sleeve .
Number of deportees : 24,906 ( rounded up to 25,000 , p. 197 and 199 ) .
Piper ’ s source is a book by Maxim Steinberg , which actually mentions 24,906 jews deported from Belgium to Auschwitz , but also mentions that 1,380 of these were sorted out in Kosel .
Therefore , Piper lists an excess of approximately 1,400 deportees .
Number of deportees @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( p .
109f . )
5,951 jews were sent from Italy to Auschwitz , to which 1,820 jews from the islands Rhodos and Koo ( Dodekanes ) have to be added .
Therefore the total is 7,711 and Piper ’ s number is too low by 300 .
Piper simply lists here the number without specifying the origin and number of transports .
According to D. Czech ’ s Kalendarium the number of deported under this category is about 12,500 , to which 7,500 jewess are to be added who arrived from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well as 1,400 jews who also came from Plaszow on May 14 , 1944 .
This results in a total of 21,400 .
Under these circumstances , Piper ’ s number is too high by 12,600 .
In summary : F. Piper invented at least 180,600 jews allegedly deported to Auschwitz .
Thus , 180,600 have to be subtracted from his total number of 1,095,190 jewish deportees as listed in his table 28 on p. 199 , and the actual total is about 914,600 , of which about 205,000 were registered ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Registered , Non-Registered ( Accommodated in the Birkenau Transfer Camp ) as well as of Allegedly Gassed Deportees .
On p. 102 , F. Piper includes a table , which indicates that a total of 400,207 prisoners were registered in Auschwitz .
On p. 118 is another table with numbers assigned to the prisoners , according to D. Czech ’ s Kalendarium .
The listed total number – 390,500 – does not include the estimated 11,000 ( 11,186 ) re-education prisoners , so that the actual total number of the registered is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the numbers of the surviving inmates , as furnished by F. Piper : Adding in the re-education prisoners to this results in a total of 198,142 survivors .
According to Piper , the “ 25,000 non-registered prisoners who were transferred to other concentration camps after a brief stay in the KL Auschwitz ” ( p .
163f . )
, have to be added to this total .
This would therefore yield a total of about 223,000 survivors .
Under these circumstances , the number of dead according to Piper would be ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but Piper rounds it up to a total of 1,100,000 .
The total number of 1,300,000 deportees to Auschwitz as listed by F. Piper includes also groups of non-jews , which were – according to his allegations – murdered in the camp without registration : 3,000 Soviet POWs , 1,700 gypsies , 10,000 Poles ( p .
149f . )
, which is a total of 14,700 , rounded up to 15,000 ( p. 200 ) .
With the exception of a few dozen Poles , however , there is absolutely no documentary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these allegedly non-registered killed can be banned into the realm of fantasy as well .
The number of the non-registered admitted to the Birkenau transfer camp is considerably higher than F. Piper admits .
To this category belong at least 79,200 “ Hungarian ” jews and about 19,400 jews from Lodz .
On October 2 , 1944 , there were 17,251 jewesses still in the transfer camp who were then included with the camp population without being assigned a registration number .
The number of inmates who did not receive such a number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confirmed the probability of this number when he wrote : “ Between May and October 1944 , several tens of thousands , most probably up to one hundred thousand jewish prisoners went through the Birkenau camp without registration ” .
And finally F. Piper considerably underestimates the number of the jews who were transferred out of Auschwitz in 1944 as well as in early 1945 , because in reality this number was not less than 192,300 prior to January 17 , 1945 .
At that time , there were still 67,000 prisoners in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were transferred and 8,500 remained .
For this period , F. Piper calculates 21,000 dead .
Since the – incomplete – documentation begins on July 29 , 1941 ( death certificate No .
1 of the inmate Peter Pakosch ) , F. Piper relies for his calculations on the difference between the numbers of registered inmates on one hand and those who were actually present , escaped , or had been dismissed on the other hand .
A more exact calculation , which I will publish later , results in 19,500 victims during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s .
• None Piper says that the highest registration number , which appears in the ( incomplete ) last “ Sterbebuch ” ( death book ) of 1942 , is 45,616 .
It was assigned to the female inmate Erna Haubenstock on December 31 of that year , but the document shows that this woman died on December 23 .
Since this “ Sterbebuch ” listed as an average 128 deaths per day , it stands to reason , according to F. Piper , that until December 31 1,000 more prisoners @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dead according to the death books therefore is about 47,000 ( p. 156 ) .
The highest registration number of a dead inmate is 47,020 ( jewish inmate Jacques Caufman ) .
Not included in this number are 1,427 Soviet POWs who perished in 1942 , whose death is separately listed in the “ Totenbuch ” ( book of the dead ) .
• None Piper finally asks , whether this number is accurate , and negates it with the following argument : From the opening of the camp until December 31 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ registered .
Of these , 29,630 were still in the camp on January 1 , 1943 , and therefore about ( 126,000 – 29,630 = ) 96,500 were missing .
Of these , some 23,500 disappeared in the two previous years 1940 and 1941 , and in 1942 , 2,916 were transferred to other camps ; 48 had escaped and 997 were discharged .
Under these circumstances , Piper calculates that a total of about ( 96,500 – 23,500 – 2,916 -48 – 997 = ) 69,000 prisoners died in the year 1942 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the “ Sterbebücher.
” To explain this alleged difference , F. Piper refers to a former Auschwitz inmate Klari Weiß , who worked in the political department of the camp : “ Because of my access to the files I can estimate that there were about 48,000 natural deaths in the camp in 1942 .
The natural deaths of jews were not listed in 1943 , however , the files of about 35,000 deaths of non-jews were kept .
The number of natural deaths of non-jews in 1944 were about 30,000 ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ underlines that Klari Weiß talks only about “ natural deceases ; ” he therefore calculates an additional 22,000 “ ‘ not natural ’ deceases – these inmates were killed in the gas chambers and with phenol injections.
” ( p. 158 ) • None Piper ’ s calculations , however , are basically worthless , because it has to be shown first that two different books were kept for the deaths , an official book – the “ Sterbebücher ” for the registered inmates – as well as an unofficial book for those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There are no documentary traces of the latter ; there is not a single example of a decease other than those officially listed in all the documents about mortalities in Auschwitz – the “ Leichenhallenbuch ” ( morgue book , 13,526 deceases ) , the “ Stärkebuch ” ( number of inmates book , 22,168 deceases ) as well as death certificates ( 4,839 deceases ) .
This information is on p. 155 of F. Piper .
On the contrary : As Thomas Grotum and Jan Parcer emphasize , the “ Sterbebücher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths , like those 67 inmates who were “ shot during an escape.
” The two authors even explained : “ Most death causes , as can be found in the death entries , were feigned .
In order to cover up the true circumstances of the deaths of the Auschwitz inmates the clerks had instructions to choose possible reasons for the deaths from a prepared list.
” In the following they add : “ Among the 68,864 death entries are 2,727 , where ‘ sudden heart failure ’ is mentioned as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these cases it can be shown that these were unnatural death causes.
” Thus , according to T. Grotum and J. Parcer , the ‘ non-natural ’ deceases were listed in the death books , either explicitly or implicitly , with false entries for the cause of death .
On the other hand , the number of examples mentioned by them is so small that their allegation that “ most causes of death ” were false is not justified .
It can be assumed that , if manipulations occurred , they were initiated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bureaucratic routine , which was laid down in the regulations for the concentration camps in 1941 .
According to it , the following documents had to be prepared in duplicate “ in cases of unnatural deceases and suicides : ” 1 Funeral certificate of the SS- and police court 1 Termination certificate of the SS- and police court .
It may be that the individuals responsible in some cases thought that it would be easier to bypass the bothersome bureaucratic paperwork and to list a false cause of death instead .
In view @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Piper has to be discarded as being unsound .
Because , as is common knowledge , the documentation about Auschwitz is incomplete , there is no reason to assume that the numbers of transferred , escaped , and released prisoners are complete , as they are listed by F. Piper with reference to D. Czech ’ s Kalendarium .
For example : D. Czech listed less than half of the actual transfers from Auschwitz to other camps for the year 1944 .
For this reason , the exact opposite of F. Piper ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths were entered into the death books , the missing 22,000 inmates did not die in the camp but belong to the other three categories , mainly of course the one of transfers .
• None Piper indicates that the highest registration number in the last death book of the year 1943 is 36,991 and was assigned to the inmate Zelik Gieclik , who died on December 18 .
Because the average daily mortality during that period was about 105 , 1,400 further inmates can be assumed to have died until December 31 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deceased for 1943 is to be estimated at over 38,000 ( p. 160 ) .
However , this calculation is erroneous : While the last death book of the year 1942 ( No .
31 ) only partly survived , this is not the case for the last death book of 1943 ( No .
25 ) ; this one is complete , and the apparent discrepancy is because the numbering of the registrations was not handled in strict chronological order .
The relevant death book actually covers the period until December 31 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number of a deceased is 36,983 ; the dead is the inmate Stanislaw Domanski .
• None Piper refers a second time to Klari Weiß , who according to him said “ that the deaths of jewish inmates in 1943 were no longer registered , even in case of a ‘ natural ’ death ( certainly not even death certificates were prepared in these cases ) .
As Klari Weiß reports , the result of her evidence is that in 1943 a total of 35,000 non-jews died.
” ( p. 160 ) However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by documents in any way either , and F. Piper ’ s hypothesis that jewish inmates who died a natural ( or unnatural ) death could have disappeared without a death certificate ( or with a falsified entry of the cause of death ) from the camp ’ s population , is simply wrong .
• None Piper again took refuge in an awkward method of calculation in order to account for the difference between the number of dead as claimed by him and those listed in the death books .
He emphasizes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until the end of 1943 , of which 85,298 were still in the camp on December 31 , 1943 , so that ca .
197,000 inmates were missing .
Of these , he writes , about 96,500 disappeared in the previous years ( 1940 to 1942 ) .
In 1943 , 19,859 prisoners were transferred to other camps and 139 escaped , so that the number of perished inmates in that year ( 197,000 – 96,500 – 19,859 – 139 = ) is about 80,500 ( p .
160ff . )
, which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number .
In reality , it is likely that most of these inmates were transferred to other camps .
• None Piper maintains that no document at all exists today about the mortality in Auschwitz for this year , but D. Czech ’ s states that “ in the year 1944 about 30,000 registered inmates were killed ” ( p. 162 ) .
In order to determine the number of victims for 1944 , Piper uses the following method of calculation : The total number of registered prisoners in the camp of Auschwitz @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these 197,000 disappeared from the camp population prior to the end of 1943 .
Of the remaining 203,000 , 163,000 were transferred or evacuated , 300 escaped , about 500 were released and about 8,000 were liberated by the Soviets .
Under these circumstances , argues F. Piper , the number of perished inmates in 1944 were to be estimated at ( 203,000 – 163,000 – 300 – 500 – 8000 = ) 30,000 ( p. 163 ; 31,200 would be correct ) .
He states “ that the number of 30,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and those who died of a ‘ natural ’ death as well as killed inmates.
” ( p. 163 ) On the other hand , Klari Weiß explains that “ the number 30,000 refers only to non-jews and only to inmates who died of a ‘ natural ’ death.
” In order to explain this contradiction , F. Piper resorts to the idea of a general falsification of the “ Sterbefalldokumentation ” ( death case documentation ) , allegedly used by the SS for reasons of camouflage .
This ‘ explanation ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is true that in 1944 a total of 30,000 prisoners perished , and if it is further correct that in the same year 30,000 inmates were gassed , it has to be concluded that in 1944 not a single inmate died of a natural cause , which of course is radically impossible .
Furthermore , F. Piper almost criminally underestimates the number of those who were transferred or evacuated from Auschwitz .
Because if the approximately 8,500 inmates , who stayed in the camp until the Red Army arrived , are allowed for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and definitely not just 188,888 ( 163,000 registered as well as 25,000 non-registered ) .
A correct calculation of the number of dead for 1944 is as follows : The population of the camp on December 31 , 1943 , was 85,298 .
114,500 inmates were registered in 1944 , while 98,600 went through the transfer camp in Birkenau .
During that year , at least 250,800 prisoners were transferred or evacuated , 300 escaped , and ca .
8,500 stayed in the camp until the end .
Of these , 536 died @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Soviets .
Under these circumstances , the number of those who died in the camp can not have been higher than about ( 298 + 114,500 + 98,600 ] – 800 + 300 + 500 + 8,500 ] = ) ca .
38,500 .
The order of magnitude of this number is in agreement with the one mentioned by Klari Weiß .
The numbers of Klari Weiß agree , by the way , quite well with those documented , thus they can be considered reliable .
Incorrect , of course , are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the deceased should be listed .
The reason for her incorrect statements in this respect can be understood easily .
In the verdict of the Höß trial , the allegation was arbitrarily made that 300,000 registered inmates died or were killed in Auschwitz , so that Klari Weiß could , of course , not testify during the later Cracow trial against the camp personal that ‘ only ’ as many inmates died as were registered in the death books ; she had to maintain that there were additional cases of death besides those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the number of 340,000 dead among the registered inmates , a figure frequently mentioned in the Auschwitz-literature , is based “ on an erroneous interpretation of the number mentioned by Sehn , which covers the transferred inmates in Auschwitz as well in other concentration camps ” ( p. 164 ) Although it is true that the Polish judge Jan Sehn wrote : “ More than 400,000 inmates , listed in different registration series , arrived in the camp Auschwitz .
Of these , 340,000 died in Auschwitz and other camps , to which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statement is interpreted wrongly , than nobody else is responsible for this than F. Piper , since he himself claimed in 1978 that “ about 340,000 of the registered inmates – men , women and children ” died or were killed in Auschwitz .
What has been explained so far permits one to come to the following ( preliminary ) conclusions : • None The number of deportees to Auschwitz is about 1,111,100 ; of these 914,600 were jews and 196,500 non-jews .
• None About 401,500 prisoners were registered in the camp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the rest non-jews .
• None The number of jews who were assigned to the “ Durchgangslager ” ( transfer camp ) of Birkenau and then transferred to other camps is not less than 98,600 .
• None At least 250,800 prisoners were transferred or evacuated in 1944 as well as in January 1945 .
• None The number of those who perished in Auschwitz is about 135,000 .
The breakdown of the deceased for the various years is listed in the following table : • None The total number of released @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as inmates liberated by the Soviets is at least ( 500 + 98,600 ] – 135,500 ] = ) 364,600 .
• None The difference between these numbers and the total number of the deportees to Auschwitz is a maximum of ( 1,111,100 – 364,600 – 135,500 = ) about 611,000 , or 55 % .
According to official history , these are the ‘ non-registered gassed.
’ • None A total of not less than 500,100 prisoners were admitted to the camp , of these ca .
401,500 were registered and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transfer section of Birkenau .
• The Fate of the Missing jews It is hardly necessary to emphasize that neither F. Piper nor any other historian has ever furnished even a trace of evidence for the gassing of the non-registered inmates , who are by and large probably identical with those unable to work .
On the other hand , it can be proven without any doubt that two of the most widely exploited alleged gassings – the one of the Birkenau gypsy camp in Birkenau ( 2,897 inmates ) as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Lodz ( 66,900 inmates ) – were actually historiographic falsifications .
Not a single one of the other alleged gassings can be backed up with documents .
It is furthermore a fact that until 1989 , official historiography considered at least 79,200 non-registered “ Hungarian ” jews , who were assigned to the transfer camp , as ‘ gassed.
’ F. Piper , however , still counts ( 79,200 – 25,000 = ) 54,200 of them as gassed !
As far as the fate of the 611,000 missing jews is concerned , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were deported further to the east .
Reichsminister Albert Speer talked about this in this connection with specific reference to Auschwitz in an important document of the “ Ostwanderung ” ( eastward migration ) .
• Meaning and Importance of Jean-Claude Pressac ’ s and Fritjof Meyer ’ s Revisions as well as Future Revisions In the first part of this article , I emphasize that an investigation of the number of victims of Auschwitz from a technical point of view must necessarily lead to a radical reduction of those allegedly ‘ gassed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accepted number of 1.1 million victims , as published by F. Piper , will doubtlessly be thrown into the garbage can of history very soon , as happened to the Soviet propaganda number of four million .
In fact , Piper ’ s number and the number accepted by official history were already drastically reduced by Jean-Claude Pressac and Fritjof Meyer .
These reductions are without question a direct consequence of revisionist research .
Jean-Claude Pressac starts with 667,200-747,200 jews who were sent to Auschwitz ; he lists the number of dead among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including 15,000 Soviet POW ’ s and 20,000 gypsies ) and believes that there were 470,000 to 550,000 non-registered jewish gassed .
For his calculations , Pressac refers to the study of F. Piper but reduces the number of admitted jews from Poland and Hungary as well as the number of deaths among registered inmates .
Regarding Poland , he believes that the number of assumed passengers riding on each individual train was exaggerated and reduces the total number from 300,000 to 150,000 .
He bases this mainly on the relation between those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % ) and those who are unable to work ( 65 to 79 % ) ; according to this , there were 50,000 employable ( registered ) “ Polish ” jews against 150,000 non-employable ( non-registered ) .
However , in the case of deportations from Bendsburg and Sosnowitz , Pressac used a revisionist argument : He emphasizes that , according to D. Czech ’ s Kalendarium , 23,714 ‘ non-employable ’ jews were sent to Auschwitz in the beginning of August 1943 within six days , in addition to one transport from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all these jews were really gassed , then the number of daily gassed would have been in the average 4,000 .
Pressac believes that the operating crematoria at that time – Krema I , III and V – had a daily cremation capacity of 1,750 corpses , and that this was reduced to 1,500 after shutting down Krema I at the end of July 1943 .
Thus , according to Pressac , the cremation of such a large number of corpses was impossible ; he continues : “ It appears that the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3000 ) -poorly estimated by the eye witnesses – was doubled.
” Although Pressac uses an untenably high cremation capacity ( the actual maximal capacity of crematoria III and V together was about 460 corpses per day ) , he uses a typical revisionist , technical argument and therefore abandons the testimonies of the witnesses as unreliable .
In the case of jewish transports from Hungary , Pressac made use of one of my arguments , which I had already made a long time ago ; this was based upon a problem , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time but could be explained subsequently .
Pressac accepts the number of about 438,000 deported “ Hungarian ” jews between May and July 1944 , but he thinks that only between 160,000 and 240,000 of these actually arrived in Auschwitz .
He can unfortunately not explain where the remaining 198,000 to 278,000 went .
Regarding the number of deaths among registered inmates , Pressac accepts for 1942 and 1943 the data of the death books , uses for 1944 the numbers of Klari Weiß , and determines for the period from January 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – certainly too high – of 1,500 dead , and posits for the period from May 1940 to the end of 1941 a number of victims of 11,988 .
He adds to this 15,000 Soviet POW ’ s and 20,000 gypsies and arrives at a total of 161,000 dead .
Since the number deceased among the gypsies is already included in the death books , 20,000 have to be deducted from Pressac ’ s total , resulting in a total of 141,000 dead , which is approximately identical with the figure I quoted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the revision undertaken by Pressac is primarily the number of the “ Hungarian ” jews sent to Auschwitz .
( That the number of deported “ Hungarian ” jews quoted by Piper is actually very inflated can be assumed as certain ) .
There is no doubt that several transports with “ Hungarian ” jews were sent to Austria ( Straßhof and Gänserndorf ) , to Bergen-Belsen , to Latvia and to Estonia ; further transports did probably arrive in Plaszow and Cracow without an intermediate stop in Auschwitz .
Still , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the numbers as listed by Pressac can not be proven with documents .
From a statistical point of view , future additional revisions of the deportees to Auschwitz will depend first of all on new findings about the deportations of “ Hungarian ” jews to other places than Auschwitz .
In May 2002 , Fritjof Meyer revised the number of victims even more radically than Pressac , and not only with reference to the new reduction of the number ( he mentions 510,000 perished inmates in Auschwitz , of these 356,000 allegedly gassed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the method .
Meyer ’ s procedure is barely veiled revisionism .
He approaches his issue not from a statistical , but from a technical point of view : His drastic reduction of the number of victims as quoted by Piper is based primarily on technical criteria , namely the capacity of the cremation ovens of Auschwitz-Birkenau .
I indicated in an earlier article that Meyer ’ s choosing of this criterion is unassailable , but he uses it incorrectly , because the technical data , which he accepts is not in accordance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dealt two deadly blows to official historiography , first by accepting the technical method of revisionists , concluding from it that no historic basis exists for the thesis of mass gassings , and second because any reduction of the number of Auschwitz victims lower than the number of missing inmates means de facto that a corresponding number of non-employable inmates were transferred from Auschwitz to other places .
By using the number of 356,000 gassed jews in Auschwitz , as quoted by F. Meyer , one arrives at the conclusion that ( 611,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left the camp alive and were transferred somewhere else .
In this case , Auschwitz certainly could not have functioned as an extermination camp for all non-employable jews deported to this camp , and this key argument of the official history collapses in itself .

By Carlo Mattogno
Published 2003-11-01
I. Thrust to the Roots of Soviet Propaganda
The Origin of the Propaganda Figure of Four Million
The propaganda story of the alleged four million Auschwitz victims appeared first in the Pravda of May 7, 1945, as is generally known, and it received its official blessing at the Nuremberg trial during the court session on February 19, 1946, thanks to the Soviet prosecutor Smirnow. But far less known is the origin of this story.
Within the framework of the investigations in Auschwitz between February 14 and March 8, 1945, by a Soviet investigation commission, four engineers, the Polish citizen Dawidowski and the Soviet citizens Dolinski, Lavrushins and Shuer, prepared an expert report about the “gas chambers” and crematoria of Auschwitz-Birkenau. In it is a short “Appendix 1” with the title “Calculations for determining the Number of Persons liquidated by the Germans in the Camp Auschwitz”. On these three pages we find the genesis of the four million number. The “expert report” starts with the following premises:
“Based on the investigated material it can be determined that the Germans, by carefully removing the traces of their crimes and misdeeds, destroyed all documents which would have made it possible to determine more or less accurately the number murdered by Hitler’s butchers in the camp.
Thus, the Germans removed, as an example, the documentation about the arrival of railroad transports carrying people; they destroyed the documentation about the quantities of women’s hair, eye glasses and dresses, as well as other evidence, which would have made it possible to determine, with the help of statistical calculations, the number of persons that perished in this camp.
Nevertheless, we think that it is possible to perform a calculation which would permit us to determine the order of magnitude of the extermination of camp inmates by the Germans.”
Because they didn’t have any documents, the Polish-Soviet ‘experts’ used a completely unreliable method of calculation – the counting of the cremated corpses in the crematoria of Auschwitz – and made additionally grotesque exaggerations.
First they divided the time of operation of these installations into three periods:
First period: Beginning of 1941[sic! Correct: 1942] to March 1943; duration 14 months. Second period: March 1943 to May 1944; duration 13 months. Third period: May to October 1944; duration 6 months.
I quote:
“During the first period, the crematorium and the gas chambers 1 and 2 were in operation as well as the pyres located next to them. During the second period the crematoria II, III, IV and V [were in operation]. During the third period the crematoria II, III, IV and V as well as the gas chamber 2 and the pyres next to it [were in operation].”
All calculations about the cremations in ovens are based on the presumption that 9,000 corpses per month were cremated in Auschwitz I, while the crematoria of Birkenau had the following monthly cremation capacities:
Crematorium II: 90,000 Crematorium III: 90,000 Crematorium IV: 45,000 Crematorium V: 45,000 Total: 270,000 corpses per month
This cremation capacity corresponds to 9,000 corpses daily (3,000 each for crematorium II and III, 1,500 each daily for crematorium IV and V) and is in reality eight times higher than the theoretical maximum capacity of these installations!
The ‘experts’ inexplicably determined a capacity for crematorium I which is exaggerated by a factor of only two. From this it follows that the alleged hourly cremation capacity of a two-muffle oven (two corpses per hour) would have been four times less than a three-muffle oven as well as an eight-muffle oven (eight corpses per hour). This is absurd, because the two-muffle ovens were not only not inferior to the ovens of Birkenau, but actually superior.
The ‘experts’ calculated the number of the cremated bodies during the third period based on the following factors:
270,000 = monthly number of cremations in the crematoria of Birkenau;
6 = Number of months the crematoria were in operation;
0.9 = Utilization factor of the crematoria;
Therefore: (270,000 × 6) × 0.9 = 1,450,000 dead.
For the second period of thirteen months the ‘experts’ assume a utilization factor of 0.5, so that their calculation appears as follows:
(270,000 × 13) × 0.5 = 1,755,000 corpses; this number is rounded down to 1,750,000.
Also for the first period of fourteen months, during which only the crematorium I was in operation, the ‘experts’ decided an utilization factor of 0.5 and came thus to:
(9,000 × 14) × 0.5 = 63,000 dead.
Accordingly the total number of corpses cremated in the crematoria as per commission during these three periods amounted to 3,263,000.
For the “gas chamber 2”, the so-called ‘Bunker 2,’ which was supposed to be in operation for six months during the third period, the ‘experts’ determined a daily killing capacity of 3,000 people, or 90,000 per month. They assumed an utilization factor of 0.5, which according to them will result in a the total number of the murdered in that location of
(90,000 × 6) × 0.5 = 270,000.
According to the ‘experts,’ the “gas chamber 1,” i.e., the so-called ‘Bunker 1,’ was in operation during the first period for fourteen months and had a killing capacity of 5,000 per day or 150,000 per month. Using a utilization factor of 0.25 the ‘experts’ therefore calculated (150,000 × 14) × 0.25 = 525,000 dead.
Under these presuppositions, the number of gassed in both ‘bunkers’ and then on pyres cremated would have resulted in 795,000. Adding this number to the murdered and cremated in the crematoria results in a number of 4,058,000, which was rounded off by the ‘experts’ to 4,000,000.
The Arrangements between ‘Experts’ and ‘Witnesses’
It is not necessary to unleash too many words about the evidently outrageous character of this statistical method, which is based on gigantic exaggerations of the cremation capacity as well as on totally arbitrary utilization coefficients.
It has to be emphasized that the testimonies of ‘eyewitnesses’ fit seamlessly into the framework of propaganda claims. This ‘expert report’ as well as the ‘eyewitness reports’ support each other, which suggests that the witnesses were without any doubt instructed by the ‘experts’ before they made their statements. It is a fact, in any case, that the witnesses as well as the ‘experts’ made intrinsically incorrect statements. I am thinking primarily about the capacity of the crematoria as postulated by both.
Henryk Tauber, plainly the key witness, was questioned by the Soviets on February 27 and 28, 1945. He maintained that the two-muffle ovens of crematorium I operated at a muffle temperature between 1,200 to 1,500 degrees Celsius, which is absolutely absurd. He further testified that within 20 to 25 minutes four to five corpses were cremated in one muffle in the five three-muffle ovens of the crematoria II and III – technically an impossibility. Finally, he testified that in the crematoria II and III 3,000 corpses were cremated per day, which corresponds exactly to the number as stated by the Polish-Soviet ‘experts’.
A coincidence? Certainly not, because the statements with regards to the functioning of the cremation ovens as made by Tauber and the ‘experts’ are practically identical. The ‘experts’ started from the hypothesis that three to five corpses were cremated in the three-muffle ovens at the same time, which took 20 to 30 minutes, and in an eight-muffle oven the cremation of a corresponding number of corpses lasted 30 to 40 minutes.
Any engineer, even having only a cursory knowledge of thermo-dynamics, would laugh at such nonsense. The Polish-Soviet engineers, however, maintained with all their know-how that their statements were of scientific value! Any engineer with basic thermo-dynamic knowledge would dismiss as incompetent any witness coming up with such silliness, but the Polish-Soviet engineers were primarily the willing tools of Soviet propaganda, and at that time crude propaganda was in great fashion.
The Soviet-Polish commission, which inspected Majdanek in August 1944, ‘calculated’ a number of 1,380,000 victims for that camp; but in May of 1945, it was necessary that Auschwitz should horrify the world, and for this a number of victims was needed that would exceed the one claimed for Majdanek – four million to be exact!
Half a year earlier, in August 1944, other Soviet ‘experts’, the engineers Krause, Telyaner, and Grigorev, prepared an ‘expert report’ about the cremation ovens of concentration camp Majdanek, which were constructed by the company H. Kori. In this report, among others a “schematic diagram for the determination of the cremation time of the corpses in different cremation ovens at different temperatures” was included. According to its authors, this diagram was based on operating temperatures measured for civilian ovens of the models Klingenstierna, Siemens, and Schneider. According to this, the cremation time at an operating temperature of 800°C was two hours, which is not below but actually above the actual time required. According to the diagram, the cremation of a corpse at an operating temperature of 1000°C – the temperature at those gigantic “hot air cremation ovens” – lasted 60 minutes, at 1200°C 50 minutes, at 1300°C 45 minutes, at 1400°C 30 minutes, and at 1500°C 15 minutes. The temperature inside the muffle of ovens for civilians could actually reach only a maximum of 1100°C, and this for a few minutes only. Engineer Richard Kessler, one of the best-known German specialists in the area of cremation, said in this regard:
“Operating temperatures of 1200 to 1500ºC, as they are frequently mentioned in reports about the operation of crematoria, […] are probably only erroneously estimated but not measured temperatures. At these temperatures, the bones and the fireclay soften and weld together. The most practical operating temperatures lie between 850 and 900ºC, according to tests in Dessau.”
It is therefore clear that the Soviet ‘specialists’ who dealt with Auschwitz based their absurdly short cremation times of Topf ovens of 20 to 40 minutes on this diagram, according to which such cremation times could be reached at temperatures between 1200 and 1500°C.
From this it follows easily that Henryk Tauber’s depositions, claiming that the ovens had an operating temperature between 1200 to 1500°C, were nothing else than the attempt to explain the claimed, impossibly short cremation times. The only logical conclusion is that these temperatures – as well as the alleged cremation times – were directly or indirectly given to Tauber by the ‘experts’ themselves!
Later, on May 24, 1945, Tauber (who understood very little of these questions), when questioned by the Polish judge Jan Sehn, testified that the operating temperature of the ovens was between 1000 to 1200 degrees Celsius, but maintained his untenable assertions about the cremation capacity and expressively mentioned the Soviet figure of four million victims! Tauber did not even understand that he contradicted himself with this, because according to the diagram mentioned, the cremation of a corpse at these temperatures lasts an average of 75 minutes!
The Reason and Meaning of Franciszek Piper’s Revision
It is generally known that the propaganda figure of four million Auschwitz victims, as propagated by the Soviets, was chiselled into the memorial plaques, which were erected not far from crematoria II and III of Birkenau as an ‘eternal’ warning for posterity. Until 1990, the plaques announced that four million people were murdered there by the “Nazis.” In that year – the Soviet system had just collapsed – the Auschwitz museum undertook a revision of the number of victims: Franciszek Piper, head of the historical department of the museum, established a new propaganda figure of 1.5 million. Following this, the inscriptions on the memorial plaques were removed. Several years later, new plaques with the following text were installed:
“May this place be a cry of despair and a warning to mankind. Here the ‘Nazis’ murdered about one and a half million men, women and children. Most of them were jews from different countries of Europe. Auschwitz-Birkenau 1940-1945.”
In 1991, F. Piper wrote a long article about the number of victims of the camp, in which he announced the publication of another detailed study; in this article, he no longer spoke of 1,500,000, but only of 1,100,000 dead. In the following year, this study was indeed published in the form of a small book, and again two years later, in 1993, Piper published the ‘definite’ version of his study under the title The Number of Victims in Auschwitz.
On what fragile foundation this new figure of 1.1 million is based and to what new revisions it was subjected during the last decade, is well known. But how was it possible that the Soviet propaganda figure of four million could stay valid in Auschwitz itself up to the year 1990? F. Piper wrote about this as follows:
“The number of four million victims was spread in the literature by Jan Sehn, who in 1945 and 1946 was head of the Polish commission for the investigation of crimes in Auschwitz. This number was mentioned in many publications in Poland (Auschwitz State Museum, Main Commission for the Investigation of ‘Nazi’ Crimes in Poland), in Czecho-Slovakia and in the GDR [former communist East Germany]. However, this number of three to four million did not find greater resonance in publications of the West, regardless of the known testimony of Höß in Nuremberg. One of the first researchers who questioned this high, estimated number of victims in Auschwitz was the British historian Gerald Reitlinger. In his elaborate study on the destruction of the jews during World War II, he wrote that in Auschwitz ‘considerably less than a million people’ died; of these about 550,000 to 600,000 were jews who were murdered immediately after their arrival at the camp, and an unknown number of about 300,000 registered prisoners, who were no longer there on the day of liberation; the majority of them were jews.”
In reality, the propaganda figure of four million had been dictated by the Soviets and was maintained by the communist world for pure self-interest. The West, however, generally accepted the lapidary judgment of G. Reitlinger:
“The world became suspicious about such ‘estimates,’ and the round figure of 4 million cannot withstand a serious examination.”
The Polish judge Jan Sehn was actually more Soviet than the Soviets themselves: In the known summary of conclusions of his investigation of the year 1946, which became the foundation of the indictment against Rudolf Höß the following year, he wrote of even five million victims (“pięciu milionów“)!
Sehn knew very well that the Soviet four million figure was an obvious lie. During his investigations prior to the Höß trial, he thoroughly reviewed the so-called transport lists. These were simplified transcripts of the original documents prepared secretly by inmates who were employed by the political department of the camp. In one protocol dated “Cracow, December 16, 1945”, Sehn transcribed and analyzed these lists; they included:
2,377 transports with male prisoners arrived between May 20, 1940, and September 18, 1944. The arrivals were assigned the registration numbers 1-199,531. 1,046 transports with female prisoners arrived between February 26, 1942, and March 26, 1944. These prisoners received the numbers 1-75,697. 78 male transports ordered by the RSHA ( Reichssicherheitshauptamt ) arrived between May 12 and August 1944 (registration numbers A-1/A-20,000). 60 transports with male jews arrived between July 31 and September 21, 1944, ordered by the RSHA (registration numbers B-1/B-10,481). 90 transports with female jews arrived between May 15 and September 20, 1944, ordered by the RSHA (registration numbers A-1/A-25,378). 171 transports with prisoners for re-education arrived between October 21, 1941, and September 20, 1944 (registration numbers E/1/E-9,339).
Although these lists are not complete, they allow us to determine roughly the order of magnitude of prisoners that arrived in Auschwitz. In fact, they also serve as the basis for the Auschwitz Chronicle by Danuta Czech published in the German language between 1959 and 1964.
As is generally known, the “French”-jewish historian Georges Wellers wrote an article in 1983 about the number of victims of Auschwitz, which is also based on the study by D. Czech. Wellers came to the conclusion that 1,613,455 people were deported to Auschwitz, of which 1,334,700 were killed. Although his calculations are full of mistakes (which I pointed out in a separate study), his writing dealt a deathblow to the four million fairy tale. Why did the Auschwitz-Museum defend the four million figure until 1990, although the study, which formed the basis for their revision, existed since 1964? F. Piper gave the following explanation:
“The state-run Auschwitz museum in Oświęcim [Polish name of Auschwitz] started relatively late in the seventies to research the problem of the number of victims. At that time, the research did not give clear results and neither confirmed nor questioned the numbers of the Soviet and Polish investigating authorities.”
As already noted, this is completely wrong, because the primary instrument of the propagandistic four million figure – D. Czech’s Kalendarium – was created by the Auschwitz-Museum itself, and this refutes that figure categorically, as G. Wellers proved later, regardless of his own mistakes. And although the Kalendarium, as already mentioned, existed since 1964, F. Piper wrote the following in 1978 in a French book, which was one of the first books published by the Auschwitz museum addressing the general history of the camp (chapter “extermination”):
“In the barely five years of the existence of the camp, about 4,000,000 people perished as the consequence of diseases and executions as well as from mass murders in the gas chambers.”
Piper states that he started working on the number of victims of Auschwitz in 1980 and came to preliminary conclusions in 1986, but can one seriously believe that a researcher, who has been employed by the historical department of the Auschwitz museum since 1965 and is its manager today, took the Soviet four-million legend at face value? Should this really be the case, it would be proof of a tragic blindness, unworthy of a history researcher. But if it is not so, as I assume, then it is proof of indecent political and ideological opportunism, also not befitting of a history researcher.
It should also be mentioned that the so-called memoirs of the first Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höß were first published in Poland, and that Höß speaks therein of two and a half million victims; he claims that Eichmann gave him this figure. Höß lists the “largest actions”, from which a total of 1,130,000 deportees derives; this would have been one more reason for the Auschwitz museum as well as F. Piper to check the four million figure.
In 1990, after the collapse of the communist regime in Poland, F. Piper made use of the favorable hour to ban the thoroughly discredited old figure into history’s scrap heap: he pretends now to be a free and critical spirit who undertook a major revision and therefore deserves the attention of the historians!
The Consequences of Giving Up the Propaganda Figure of Four Million
Whoever thinks that the propaganda figure of four million can be dropped without punishment deceives himself completely. This figure is closely connected with the thesis of mass extermination in Auschwitz and cannot be thrown overboard without bringing the whole artificial building into sway. Regardless of the futile efforts of Jean-Claude Pressac to prove this thesis of mass extermination by documents, it is up to this day based exclusively on statements of alleged eye witnesses, and Pressac himself had to make use of those when he tried to describe the first alleged homicidal gassing in crematorium II of Birkenau.
As already said, the witness testimonies and the four million figure were intimately woven together right from the start, in a way that the refutation of the witness testimonies would have been equivalent to a refutation of this figure and vice versa; at the same time, the entire thesis of mass extermination in Auschwitz would become untenable.
Today, as the four million figure is finally off the table, the official history has in fact taken this irreversible path to refute the orthodox Auschwitz version. The investigation of the actual capacity of the cremation ovens of Auschwitz causes the inevitable breakdown of the thesis of mass extermination of human beings in Auschwitz, because the most important witnesses, whose testimonies are necessary to support this thesis, have in the meantime been exposed as vulgar deceivers. Without fear of refutation, it can be said today that not a single one of the key witnesses – the members of the so-called “Sonderkommando” – ever told the truth about the cremation ovens; they all lied shamelessly without exception. They lied in order to reinforce the thesis of mass extermination.
But if they lied in this key point, then what credibility can their testimonies have regarding the ‘gassings’ of humans?
An honest dispute of this question has to result necessarily in a radical reduction of the number of people allegedly ‘gassed,’ and the article published by Fritjof Meyer in the spring of 2002, further reducing the number of victims in Auschwitz, is a writing on the wall for the official historiography.
This is of course only valid for those researchers who posses a minimum of honesty and critical spirit, and certainly not for the Auschwitz-museum: although its historians have abandoned the four million figure, they still quote the thermo-dynamically ridiculous testimonies of ‘eye witnesses’ as serious sources and could not care less about the obvious contradictions resulting from this.
In this sense, F. Piper was not ashamed to write the following as late as 1994:
“A letter of the Central Construction Office to Group C of June 24, 1943, states that the capacity of crematorium I was 340 bodies, 1,440 each for crematoria II and III as well as 768 each for crematoria IV and V. Thus, the five crematoria could cremate 4,765 bodies daily. This estimate agrees with the descriptions of the capacity of a five muffle crematorium for POW’s, according to which two bodies could be cremated within 30 minutes. However, crematorium I was shut down in the following month, which reduced the capacity to 4,515.
In their attempt to increase the cremation capacity of the ovens, the camp administration recommended to cut down the cremation time to 20 minutes and to triple the number of corpses, depending on the size of the bodies. As a result, the capacity of the crematoria could almost be doubled and went up to 8,000 corpses within 24 hours, as an inmate of the Sonderkommando, Feinsilber, testifies.”
Thus this ‘critical spirit’ of the Auschwitz museum, who reduced the number of victims of the camp to almost a quarter, opportunistically invented a cremation capacity, which was eight times above the actual capacity! F. Piper of course knows exactly that the credibility of his ‘eyewitnesses’ goes down the drain if he would state the true capacity of the ovens, and this would also render all the allegations about homicidal gassings from these same witnesses untrustworthy. This is the reason why the Auschwitz museum is and continues to be an authority on superstition and prefers fairy tales of ‘eyewitnesses’ over science.
II. Franciszek Piper and The Number of Victims of Auschwitz
Introduction
In the previous chapter “Thrust to the Roots of Soviet Propaganda” I described how Franciszek Piper, head of the history department at the Auschwitz Museum, let himself always be guided by political and ideological opportunism. During the time of the communist regime he accepted the four million figure faithfully and blindly according to the party instructions, but as soon as the regime broke down he freed himself from the rubble of the Soviet propaganda and published a pretentious ‘scientific’ piece with the title The Number of Victims of Auschwitz. This study was highly regarded by official historians. In the following article I shall show what its real value is.
The Number of Deported jews
Piper investigates the extent of the jewish transportations to Auschwitz from the various countries and summarizes the results in tables, in which he enumerates the corresponding transports (p. 182-198). On page 199 he then represents the final result of his summaries.
In this section the veracity of these conclusions will be checked in detail.
2.1. Hungary
Number of deportees: 438,000 (p. 182 and 199). A total of 437,402 jews were deported from this country between May and July 1944; of these, however, at the most 398,400 arrived in Auschwitz according to current knowledge. Therefore, the number quoted by F. Piper is too high by 39,600.
2.2 Poland
Number of deportees: 300,000 (p. 183-186 and 199). F. Piper notes for the time from May to August 1942 the following – allegedly all gassed – transports from Polish ghettos:
Date of Arrival Place of Origin Deportees May 5, 1942 Dąbrowa Górnica 630 G May 12, 1942 Sosnowiec 1,500 May 1942 Zawiercie 2,000 May 1942 Będzin 2,000 June 17, 1942 Sosnowiec 1,000 June 20, 1942 Sosnowiec 2,000 June 1942 Biesko-Biała 5,000 G June 1942 Olkusz 3,000 G June 1942 Krzepice 1,000 G June 1942 Chrzanów 4,000 G August 1-3, 1942 Będzin 5,000 G August 15, 1942 Sosnowiec 2,000 August 16, 1942 Sosnowiec 2,000 August 17, 1942 Sosnowiec 2,000 August 18, 1942 Sosnowiec 2,000 Total 13,000
These transports are pure inventions; there is not the trace of an indication of these in the existing documentation, and in her Auschwitz Kalendarium Danuta Czech cannot furnish the slightest proof for the reality of these transports. The transports marked by me with a “G” are mentioned in the well-known Atlas of the “British”-jewish historian Martin Gilbert, a study without any sources, which therefore has no historical value at all, because it is impossible to separate reality from fantasy.
Information about the alleged transport of 1000 jews from Grodno in November 1942 (Piper does not give the exact date), supposedly all gassed right after their arrival, is taken from D. Czech’s Kalendarium; the same is true for the transport of 1000 jews from Bialystok of November 8, 1942. For both transports D. Czech quotes the diary of Dr. Johannes Kremer as a source:
“This is the 12th Sonderaktion, in which Dr. Kremer participates. (Auschwitz in den Augen der SS, op. cit. Diary Kremers, p. 232).”
“This is the 13th Sonderaktion, in which Dr. Kremer participates. (Auschwitz in den Augen der SS, op. cit. Diary Kremers, p. 232).”
However, the source quoted by D. Czech refutes her own claim: the corresponding part from Dr. Kremer’s diary as printed in the 1997 edition of Auschwitz in den Augen der SS actually read as follows:
“November 8, 1942. Participated tonight in 2 Sonderaktionen in rainy gray fall weather (12. and 13.)”
Dr. Kremer neither mentions the arrival of those two transports nor the number of admissions, and both cases are therefore pure inventions by D. Czech.
In a footnote Jadwiga Bezwińska as well as Danuta Czech explain themselves (!):
“jews from the concentration camp Lublin (Majdanek) arrived. 25 men were assigned as inmates to the camp; the others (number unknown) were gassed”.
In other words: D. Czech never had in her possession any proof for the arrival of the two mentioned transports in Auschwitz, and therefore these are to be categorized as pure inventions. The same is true for the transport of 2,500 jews from Chrzanów on February 18, 1943, for which Pipers again quotes Gilbert’s Atlas.
The transport with 4,000 jews from Łomża of January 14, 1943 is not even listed in D. Czech’s Kalendarium. The same for the transports with 1,000 jews from Czestochowa on June 25, 1943, with 5,000 jews from Tarnów on September 2, 1943, with 3,500 jews from Przemyśl on September 2, 1943, with 1,000 jews from Rzeszów in November 1943, with 600 jews from Borysław on March 28, 1844, as well as finally with 700 jews from Borysław on June 22, 1944.
Thus, the second group of transports comprises a further 20,300 fictitious deportees.
An even more characteristic example for F. Piper’s methods is the case of Lodz. The subtotal of his table about transports of “Polish” jews to Auschwitz is 225,464 deportees. This table lists, among others, 11 transports from the ghetto of Lodz, to which F. Piper assigns an – incomplete – number of 4,818 deportees. He then adds further 55,000 to 65,000 jews sent to Auschwitz from this ghetto for August and September 1944 and arrives thus at the already mentioned total number of 300,000 jewish deportees who arrived from Poland.
However, subtracting the subtotal from the overall total results in (300,000 – 225,464 =) 74,536 deportees. To these the 4,818, which were already included in the table, have to be added, which results in 79,354 jews who were sent to Auschwitz from Lodz, but Piper specifies their number between 60,000 to 70,000, so that the resulting number from his table is 9,354 higher than the maximum number stated by himself. But this difference is not decisive; the reality actually looks quite different. As I described in my article “The Evacuation of the Ghettos of Lodz and the Deportations to Auschwitz (August 1944)”, the number of the jews sent from Lodz to Auschwitz is approximately 22,5000, which shows that F. Piper pulled a further 56,854 deportees out of his hat.
In summary, the number of the Piper’s fictitious jewish arrivals from Poland is therefore (35,130 + 20,300 + 56,854 =) about 112,300.
2.3 France
Number of deportees: 69,114 (rounded to 69,000) (p. 187f.).
Piper’s source for this is the known documentation of Serge Klarsfeld, in which the number of the “French” jews deported to Auschwitz is listed as 68,921. However, F. Piper did not consider the jews, which were selected in Kosel, whose number according to Klarsfeld was between 3,056 and 4,000 (so we can use a average of 3,500). Therefore the number of jews who arrived in Auschwitz is about (68,921 – 3,500) =) 65,400, and the number listed by Piper is too high by (69,000 – 65,400 =) 3,600.
2.4 Holland
Number of deportees: 60,085 (rounded to 60,000) (p. 189f.). In this case as well, Piper ignores the jews who were sorted out in Kosel, numbered by the Dutch Red Cross at 3,540.
2.5 Greece
Number of deportees: 54,533 (rounded to 55,000) (p. 191 an 199). In the corresponding table, a transport with 2,500 jews is listed, which arrived on August 16, 1944, from the Island Rhodos. But the same transport also appears in the table for Italy, except that the date of arrival is here July 23, 1944, and the number of deportees is listed as 1,805. As the Italian historian Liliana Picciotto Fargion explains, a transport with 1,820 “Italian” jews left the Dodekanes (Rhodos and Koo) on July 23, 1944, made an intermediate stop in Athens on August 3, and arrived in Auschwitz on August 16. F. Piper counts it, as we have seen, twice and gives a different number in each case. This transport has to be counted under Italy, since at that time those islands were Italian territory, and the number of deported jews from Greece has to be reduced by 2,500.
2.6 Theresienstadt
Number of deportees: 46,099 (rounded to 46,000) (p. 192). According to the memorial book of the ghetto Theresienstadt, 43,454 jews were transferred to Auschwitz between 1942 and 1944, so that Piper’s number is too high by approximately 3,400.
2.7 Yugoslavia
Number of the deportees: 10,000 (p. 196 and 199). For the transports from Zagreb on May 7 and 13, 1943, F. Piper counts a total of 4,000 deportees, while D. Czech tallies these to 2,000. This means that F. Piper had 2,000 deportees up his sleeve.
2.8 Belgium
Number of deportees: 24,906 (rounded up to 25,000, p. 197 and 199). Piper’s source is a book by Maxim Steinberg, which actually mentions 24,906 jews deported from Belgium to Auschwitz, but also mentions that 1,380 of these were sorted out in Kosel. Therefore, Piper lists an excess of approximately 1,400 deportees.
2.9 Italy
Number of deportees: 7,422 (rounded to 7,500) (p. 109f.) 5,951 jews were sent from Italy to Auschwitz, to which 1,820 jews from the islands Rhodos and Koo (Dodekanes) have to be added. Therefore the total is 7,711 and Piper’s number is too low by 300.
2.10 Concentration Camps, Auxiliary Camps and other Places
Number of deportees: 34,000 (p. 199).
Piper simply lists here the number without specifying the origin and number of transports. According to D. Czech’s Kalendarium the number of deported under this category is about 12,500, to which 7,500 jewess are to be added who arrived from Plaszow on August 6, 1944, as well as 1,400 jews who also came from Plaszow on May 14, 1944. This results in a total of 21,400. Under these circumstances, Piper’s number is too high by 12,600.
2.11 Summary
In summary: F. Piper invented at least 180,600 jews allegedly deported to Auschwitz. Thus, 180,600 have to be subtracted from his total number of 1,095,190 jewish deportees as listed in his table 28 on p. 199, and the actual total is about 914,600, of which about 205,000 were registered (p. 103).
The Number of Registered, Non-Registered (Accommodated in the Birkenau Transfer Camp) as well as of Allegedly Gassed Deportees.
On p. 102, F. Piper includes a table, which indicates that a total of 400,207 prisoners were registered in Auschwitz. On p. 118 is another table with numbers assigned to the prisoners, according to D. Czech’s Kalendarium. The listed total number – 390,500 – does not include the estimated 11,000 (11,186) re-education prisoners, so that the actual total number of the registered is about 401,500. The following table summarizes the numbers of the surviving inmates, as furnished by F. Piper:
Year Transferred Released Escaped Liberated p. 1940 92 ? 3 152 1941 2,282 ? 6 154 1942 2,916 997 48 156 1943 19,859 0 139 160 1944/1945 163,000 500 300 8,000 163 Total 188,149 1,497 496 8,000
Adding in the re-education prisoners to this results in a total of 198,142 survivors. According to Piper, the “25,000 non-registered prisoners who were transferred to other concentration camps after a brief stay in the KL Auschwitz” (p. 163f.), have to be added to this total. This would therefore yield a total of about 223,000 survivors. Under these circumstances, the number of dead according to Piper would be (1,300,000 – 223,000 =) 1,077,000, but Piper rounds it up to a total of 1,100,000.
The total number of 1,300,000 deportees to Auschwitz as listed by F. Piper includes also groups of non-jews, which were – according to his allegations – murdered in the camp without registration: 3,000 Soviet POWs, 1,700 gypsies, 10,000 Poles (p. 149f.), which is a total of 14,700, rounded up to 15,000 (p. 200). With the exception of a few dozen Poles, however, there is absolutely no documentary evidence for these allegations, so that these allegedly non-registered killed can be banned into the realm of fantasy as well.
The number of the non-registered admitted to the Birkenau transfer camp is considerably higher than F. Piper admits. To this category belong at least 79,200 “Hungarian” jews and about 19,400 jews from Lodz. On October 2, 1944, there were 17,251 jewesses still in the transfer camp who were then included with the camp population without being assigned a registration number. The number of inmates who did not receive such a number was at least 98,600. Andrzej Strzelecki confirmed the probability of this number when he wrote:
“Between May and October 1944, several tens of thousands, most probably up to one hundred thousand jewish prisoners went through the Birkenau camp without registration”.
And finally F. Piper considerably underestimates the number of the jews who were transferred out of Auschwitz in 1944 as well as in early 1945, because in reality this number was not less than 192,300 prior to January 17, 1945. At that time, there were still 67,000 prisoners in the camp; about 58,500 of them were transferred and 8,500 remained.
The Number of Dead (Registered Inmates)
4.1. 1940-1941
For this period, F. Piper calculates 21,000 dead. Since the – incomplete – documentation begins on July 29, 1941 (death certificate No. 1 of the inmate Peter Pakosch), F. Piper relies for his calculations on the difference between the numbers of registered inmates on one hand and those who were actually present, escaped, or had been dismissed on the other hand. A more exact calculation, which I will publish later, results in 19,500 victims during this period, including the Soviet POW’s.
4.2. 1942
Piper says that the highest registration number, which appears in the (incomplete) last “Sterbebuch” (death book) of 1942, is 45,616. It was assigned to the female inmate Erna Haubenstock on December 31 of that year, but the document shows that this woman died on December 23. Since this “Sterbebuch” listed as an average 128 deaths per day, it stands to reason, according to F. Piper, that until December 31 1,000 more prisoners died and that the total number of dead according to the death books therefore is about 47,000 (p. 156). The highest registration number of a dead inmate is 47,020 (jewish inmate Jacques Caufman). Not included in this number are 1,427 Soviet POWs who perished in 1942, whose death is separately listed in the “Totenbuch” (book of the dead). Piper finally asks, whether this number is accurate, and negates it with the following argument:
From the opening of the camp until December 31, 1942, ca. 126,000 inmates were registered. Of these, 29,630 were still in the camp on January 1, 1943, and therefore about (126,000 – 29,630 =) 96,500 were missing. Of these, some 23,500 disappeared in the two previous years 1940 and 1941, and in 1942, 2,916 were transferred to other camps; 48 had escaped and 997 were discharged. Under these circumstances, Piper calculates that a total of about (96,500 – 23,500 – 2,916 -48 – 997 =) 69,000 prisoners died in the year 1942, about 22,000 more than were listed in the “Sterbebücher.”
To explain this alleged difference, F. Piper refers to a former Auschwitz inmate Klari Weiß, who worked in the political department of the camp:
“Because of my access to the files I can estimate that there were about 48,000 natural deaths in the camp in 1942. The natural deaths of jews were not listed in 1943, however, the files of about 35,000 deaths of non-jews were kept. The number of natural deaths of non-jews in 1944 were about 30,000” (p. 227)
Piper underlines that Klari Weiß talks only about “natural deceases;” he therefore calculates an additional 22,000
“‘not natural’ deceases – these inmates were killed in the gas chambers and with phenol injections.” (p. 158)
Piper’s calculations, however, are basically worthless, because it has to be shown first that two different books were kept for the deaths, an official book – the “Sterbebücher” for the registered inmates – as well as an unofficial book for those who died an ‘non-natural’ death. There are no documentary traces of the latter; there is not a single example of a decease other than those officially listed in all the documents about mortalities in Auschwitz – the “Leichenhallenbuch” (morgue book, 13,526 deceases), the “Stärkebuch” (number of inmates book, 22,168 deceases) as well as death certificates (4,839 deceases). This information is on p. 155 of F. Piper. On the contrary: As Thomas Grotum and Jan Parcer emphasize, the “Sterbebücher” include indications about ‘non-natural’ deaths, like those 67 inmates who were “shot during an escape.” The two authors even explained:
“Most death causes, as can be found in the death entries, were feigned. In order to cover up the true circumstances of the deaths of the Auschwitz inmates the clerks had instructions to choose possible reasons for the deaths from a prepared list.”
In the following they add:
“Among the 68,864 death entries are 2,727, where ‘sudden heart failure’ is mentioned as the cause for death. In several of these cases it can be shown that these were unnatural death causes.”
Thus, according to T. Grotum and J. Parcer, the ‘non-natural’ deceases were listed in the death books, either explicitly or implicitly, with false entries for the cause of death. On the other hand, the number of examples mentioned by them is so small that their allegation that “most causes of death” were false is not justified. It can be assumed that, if manipulations occurred, they were initiated by the desire to bypass the rigid bureaucratic routine, which was laid down in the regulations for the concentration camps in 1941. According to it, the following documents had to be prepared in duplicate “in cases of unnatural deceases and suicides:”
1 Interrogation protocol of the witnesses
1 Report for the commandant
1 Death certificate by the doctor
1 Autopsy report
1 Funeral certificate of the SS- and police court
1 Termination certificate of the SS- and police court.
It may be that the individuals responsible in some cases thought that it would be easier to bypass the bothersome bureaucratic paperwork and to list a false cause of death instead.
In view of these facts the thesis of F. Piper has to be discarded as being unsound. Because, as is common knowledge, the documentation about Auschwitz is incomplete, there is no reason to assume that the numbers of transferred, escaped, and released prisoners are complete, as they are listed by F. Piper with reference to D. Czech’s Kalendarium. For example: D. Czech listed less than half of the actual transfers from Auschwitz to other camps for the year 1944.
For this reason, the exact opposite of F. Piper’s assertion is true: Because all deaths were entered into the death books, the missing 22,000 inmates did not die in the camp but belong to the other three categories, mainly of course the one of transfers.
4.3. 1943
Piper indicates that the highest registration number in the last death book of the year 1943 is 36,991 and was assigned to the inmate Zelik Gieclik, who died on December 18. Because the average daily mortality during that period was about 105, 1,400 further inmates can be assumed to have died until December 31, so that the total number of deceased for 1943 is to be estimated at over 38,000 (p. 160).
However, this calculation is erroneous: While the last death book of the year 1942 (No. 31) only partly survived, this is not the case for the last death book of 1943 (No. 25); this one is complete, and the apparent discrepancy is because the numbering of the registrations was not handled in strict chronological order. The relevant death book actually covers the period until December 31, 1943, and the highest listed number of a deceased is 36,983; the dead is the inmate Stanislaw Domanski.
Piper refers a second time to Klari Weiß, who according to him said
“that the deaths of jewish inmates in 1943 were no longer registered, even in case of a ‘natural’ death (certainly not even death certificates were prepared in these cases). As Klari Weiß reports, the result of her evidence is that in 1943 a total of 35,000 non-jews died.” (p. 160)
However, this allegation cannot be backed by documents in any way either, and F. Piper’s hypothesis that jewish inmates who died a natural (or unnatural) death could have disappeared without a death certificate (or with a falsified entry of the cause of death) from the camp’s population, is simply wrong.
Piper again took refuge in an awkward method of calculation in order to account for the difference between the number of dead as claimed by him and those listed in the death books. He emphasizes that ca. 282,000 prisoners were registered until the end of 1943, of which 85,298 were still in the camp on December 31, 1943, so that ca. 197,000 inmates were missing. Of these, he writes, about 96,500 disappeared in the previous years (1940 to 1942). In 1943, 19,859 prisoners were transferred to other camps and 139 escaped, so that the number of perished inmates in that year (197,000 – 96,500 – 19,859 – 139 =) is about 80,500 (p. 160ff.), which would be some 43,500 above the documented number. In reality, it is likely that most of these inmates were transferred to other camps.
4.4. 1944 (-1945)
Piper maintains that no document at all exists today about the mortality in Auschwitz for this year, but D. Czech’s Kalendarium states that “in the year 1944 about 30,000 registered inmates were killed” (p. 162). In order to determine the number of victims for 1944, Piper uses the following method of calculation:
The total number of registered prisoners in the camp of Auschwitz since its existence is about 400,200, of these 197,000 disappeared from the camp population prior to the end of 1943. Of the remaining 203,000, 163,000 were transferred or evacuated, 300 escaped, about 500 were released and about 8,000 were liberated by the Soviets. Under these circumstances, argues F. Piper, the number of perished inmates in 1944 were to be estimated at (203,000 – 163,000 – 300 – 500 – 8000 =) 30,000 (p. 163; 31,200 would be correct). He states
“that the number of 30,000 deaths includes jews as well as non-jews, and those who died of a ‘natural’ death as well as killed inmates.” (p. 163)
On the other hand, Klari Weiß explains that
“the number 30,000 refers only to non-jews and only to inmates who died of a ‘natural’ death.”
In order to explain this contradiction, F. Piper resorts to the idea of a general falsification of the “Sterbefalldokumentation” (death case documentation), allegedly used by the SS for reasons of camouflage. This ‘explanation’ is simply nonsense, because if it is true that in 1944 a total of 30,000 prisoners perished, and if it is further correct that in the same year 30,000 inmates were gassed, it has to be concluded that in 1944 not a single inmate died of a natural cause, which of course is radically impossible.
Furthermore, F. Piper almost criminally underestimates the number of those who were transferred or evacuated from Auschwitz. Because if the approximately 8,500 inmates, who stayed in the camp until the Red Army arrived, are allowed for, the actual number is about 250,000 and definitely not just 188,888 (163,000 registered as well as 25,000 non-registered).
A correct calculation of the number of dead for 1944 is as follows:
The population of the camp on December 31, 1943, was 85,298. 114,500 inmates were registered in 1944, while 98,600 went through the transfer camp in Birkenau. During that year, at least 250,800 prisoners were transferred or evacuated, 300 escaped, and ca. 8,500 stayed in the camp until the end. Of these, 536 died, and their corpses were autopsied by the Soviets. Under these circumstances, the number of those who died in the camp cannot have been higher than about (298 + 114,500 + 98,600] – 800 + 300 + 500 + 8,500] =) ca. 38,500.
The order of magnitude of this number is in agreement with the one mentioned by Klari Weiß. The numbers of Klari Weiß agree, by the way, quite well with those documented, thus they can be considered reliable. Incorrect, of course, are her statements about the categories to which the deceased should be listed. The reason for her incorrect statements in this respect can be understood easily. In the verdict of the Höß trial, the allegation was arbitrarily made that 300,000 registered inmates died or were killed in Auschwitz, so that Klari Weiß could, of course, not testify during the later Cracow trial against the camp personal that ‘only’ as many inmates died as were registered in the death books; she had to maintain that there were additional cases of death besides those registered.
Piper explains that the number of 340,000 dead among the registered inmates, a figure frequently mentioned in the Auschwitz-literature, is based
“on an erroneous interpretation of the number mentioned by Sehn, which covers the transferred inmates in Auschwitz as well in other concentration camps” (p. 164)
Although it is true that the Polish judge Jan Sehn wrote:
“More than 400,000 inmates, listed in different registration series, arrived in the camp Auschwitz. Of these, 340,000 died in Auschwitz and other camps, to which they were transferred.”
But if this statement is interpreted wrongly, than nobody else is responsible for this than F. Piper, since he himself claimed in 1978 that “about 340,000 of the registered inmates – men, women and children” died or were killed in Auschwitz.
Conclusions
What has been explained so far permits one to come to the following (preliminary) conclusions:
The number of deportees to Auschwitz is about 1,111,100; of these 914,600 were jews and 196,500 non-jews. About 401,500 prisoners were registered in the camp; of these about 205,000 were jews, the rest non-jews. The number of jews who were assigned to the “Durchgangslager” (transfer camp) of Birkenau and then transferred to other camps is not less than 98,600. At least 250,800 prisoners were transferred or evacuated in 1944 as well as in January 1945. The number of those who perished in Auschwitz is about 135,000. The breakdown of the deceased for the various years is listed in the following table:
1940-1941 19,500 1942 48,500 (48,447) 1943 37,000 (36,991) 1944 30,000 1945 500 (536) Total 135,500
The total number of released, escaped, and transferred inmates as well as inmates liberated by the Soviets is at least (500 + 98,600] – 135,500] =) 364,600. The difference between these numbers and the total number of the deportees to Auschwitz is a maximum of (1,111,100 – 364,600 – 135,500 =) about 611,000, or 55%. According to official history, these are the ‘non-registered gassed.’ A total of not less than 500,100 prisoners were admitted to the camp, of these ca. 401,500 were registered and ca. 98,600 were quartered in the transfer section of Birkenau.
The Fate of the Missing jews
It is hardly necessary to emphasize that neither F. Piper nor any other historian has ever furnished even a trace of evidence for the gassing of the non-registered inmates, who are by and large probably identical with those unable to work. On the other hand, it can be proven without any doubt that two of the most widely exploited alleged gassings – the one of the Birkenau gypsy camp in Birkenau (2,897 inmates) as well as those of the inmates of the ghettos of Lodz (66,900 inmates) – were actually historiographic falsifications. Not a single one of the other alleged gassings can be backed up with documents.
It is furthermore a fact that until 1989, official historiography considered at least 79,200 non-registered “Hungarian” jews, who were assigned to the transfer camp, as ‘gassed.’ F. Piper, however, still counts (79,200 – 25,000 =) 54,200 of them as gassed!
As far as the fate of the 611,000 missing jews is concerned, there are various documents indicating that they were deported further to the east. Reichsminister Albert Speer talked about this in this connection with specific reference to Auschwitz in an important document of the “Ostwanderung” (eastward migration).
Meaning and Importance of Jean-Claude Pressac’s and Fritjof Meyer’s Revisions as well as Future Revisions
In the first part of this article, I emphasize that an investigation of the number of victims of Auschwitz from a technical point of view must necessarily lead to a radical reduction of those allegedly ‘gassed’ in that camp. The currently accepted number of 1.1 million victims, as published by F. Piper, will doubtlessly be thrown into the garbage can of history very soon, as happened to the Soviet propaganda number of four million.
In fact, Piper’s number and the number accepted by official history were already drastically reduced by Jean-Claude Pressac and Fritjof Meyer. These reductions are without question a direct consequence of revisionist research.
Jean-Claude Pressac starts with 667,200-747,200 jews who were sent to Auschwitz; he lists the number of dead among the registered camp inmates as 161,000 (including 15,000 Soviet POW’s and 20,000 gypsies) and believes that there were 470,000 to 550,000 non-registered jewish gassed.
For his calculations, Pressac refers to the study of F. Piper but reduces the number of admitted jews from Poland and Hungary as well as the number of deaths among registered inmates. Regarding Poland, he believes that the number of assumed passengers riding on each individual train was exaggerated and reduces the total number from 300,000 to 150,000. He bases this mainly on the relation between those who can work (30 to 35 %) and those who are unable to work (65 to 79%); according to this, there were 50,000 employable (registered) “Polish” jews against 150,000 non-employable (non-registered). However, in the case of deportations from Bendsburg and Sosnowitz, Pressac used a revisionist argument: He emphasizes that, according to D. Czech’s Kalendarium, 23,714 ‘non-employable’ jews were sent to Auschwitz in the beginning of August 1943 within six days, in addition to one transport from France and one from Belgium. If all these jews were really gassed, then the number of daily gassed would have been in the average 4,000. Pressac believes that the operating crematoria at that time – Krema I, III and V – had a daily cremation capacity of 1,750 corpses, and that this was reduced to 1,500 after shutting down Krema I at the end of July 1943. Thus, according to Pressac, the cremation of such a large number of corpses was impossible; he continues:
“It appears that the number of jews per transport (2000 to 3000) -poorly estimated by the eye witnesses – was doubled.”
Although Pressac uses an untenably high cremation capacity (the actual maximal capacity of crematoria III and V together was about 460 corpses per day), he uses a typical revisionist, technical argument and therefore abandons the testimonies of the witnesses as unreliable.
In the case of jewish transports from Hungary, Pressac made use of one of my arguments, which I had already made a long time ago; this was based upon a problem, which could not be solved at that time but could be explained subsequently.
Pressac accepts the number of about 438,000 deported “Hungarian” jews between May and July 1944, but he thinks that only between 160,000 and 240,000 of these actually arrived in Auschwitz. He can unfortunately not explain where the remaining 198,000 to 278,000 went.
Regarding the number of deaths among registered inmates, Pressac accepts for 1942 and 1943 the data of the death books, uses for 1944 the numbers of Klari Weiß, and determines for the period from January 1 to 18, 1945, a number – certainly too high – of 1,500 dead, and posits for the period from May 1940 to the end of 1941 a number of victims of 11,988. He adds to this 15,000 Soviet POW’s and 20,000 gypsies and arrives at a total of 161,000 dead. Since the number deceased among the gypsies is already included in the death books, 20,000 have to be deducted from Pressac’s total, resulting in a total of 141,000 dead, which is approximately identical with the figure I quoted in this article.
The weak point of the revision undertaken by Pressac is primarily the number of the “Hungarian” jews sent to Auschwitz. (That the number of deported “Hungarian” jews quoted by Piper is actually very inflated can be assumed as certain). There is no doubt that several transports with “Hungarian” jews were sent to Austria (Straßhof and Gänserndorf), to Bergen-Belsen, to Latvia and to Estonia; further transports did probably arrive in Plaszow and Cracow without an intermediate stop in Auschwitz. Still, according to today’s knowledge, the numbers as listed by Pressac cannot be proven with documents.
From a statistical point of view, future additional revisions of the deportees to Auschwitz will depend first of all on new findings about the deportations of “Hungarian” jews to other places than Auschwitz.
In May 2002, Fritjof Meyer revised the number of victims even more radically than Pressac, and not only with reference to the new reduction of the number (he mentions 510,000 perished inmates in Auschwitz, of these 356,000 allegedly gassed), but especially with regards to the method.
Meyer’s procedure is barely veiled revisionism. He approaches his issue not from a statistical, but from a technical point of view: His drastic reduction of the number of victims as quoted by Piper is based primarily on technical criteria, namely the capacity of the cremation ovens of Auschwitz-Birkenau. I indicated in an earlier article that Meyer’s choosing of this criterion is unassailable, but he uses it incorrectly, because the technical data, which he accepts is not in accordance with reality. Nevertheless, F. Meyer dealt two deadly blows to official historiography, first by accepting the technical method of revisionists, concluding from it that no historic basis exists for the thesis of mass gassings, and second because any reduction of the number of Auschwitz victims lower than the number of missing inmates means de facto that a corresponding number of non-employable inmates were transferred from Auschwitz to other places.
By using the number of 356,000 gassed jews in Auschwitz, as quoted by F. Meyer, one arrives at the conclusion that (611,000 – 356,000 =) 255,000 non-employable jews left the camp alive and were transferred somewhere else. In this case, Auschwitz certainly could not have functioned as an extermination camp for all non-employable jews deported to this camp, and this key argument of the official history collapses in itself.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician