renegadetribune--2020-12-06--Norsemen Reviving Viking/Pagan History, Traditions and Music

There are some Scandinavian men with JewTube channels that have interacted with each other to bring new light to the history , traditions and music of Viking/Pagan culture .
Of course they are meeting resistance from the usual culprits , but their positive message is spreading .
Bjorn Andreas Bull-Hansen has the greatest following and is a novelist , youtuber , blogger and Norseman .
Here is his short bio from his youtube channel : “ I ’ m a novelist from Norway and I have been fascinated by the Viking Age since childhood .
I like doing hands-on research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me connect with the characters in my novels .
Also , I just love the outdoors life .
Except being a novelist , I am also a traveler , father , bushcrafter , yachtsman , historic archer and bowmaker , and best friend to a lazy dog.
” Bjorn has several playlists on his channel that cover Vikings , politics , men ’ s mental health , survival and prepping , life coaching , etc.
, all from a Norseman ’ s point of view .
Bjorn ’ s JOMSVIKING fictional novels have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oddly not into English .
There is a petition , that I have signed , for those who would like to have his novels translated into English .
The JOMSVIKING series of historical novels are set to the latest decades of the Viking Age .
It is the saga of Thorstein and his family .
Another interesting Norwegian , Sturla , who is a historian and DNA researcher , has a fairly recent youtube channel called Viking Stories .
I include here Bjorn ’ s video interview with Sturla that took place in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sturla answers questions about his DNA research into the origins of Viking culture , including possible ancient Neanderthal and Celtic connections .
He also discusses how he was shunned from “ official ” academia due to the direction of his research not being considered “ acceptable ” due to modern academia ’ s Marxist leanings .
Unfortunately as of 4 December 2020 comes this video from Sturla .
Matthias is an American living in Germany .
The name of his channel is BerserkerGang2019 .
He describes himself as a hands on researcher , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He has met with Bjorn to help Bjorn in the construction of his Viking cabin .
Sturla interviewed Pär Hulkoff in October 2020 and talks about musical groups that are making connections to Viking/Pagan/Nordic roots .
Here are examples of the music performed by the groups mentioned in Sturla ’ s interview with Hulkoff .
One final video from Bjorn , that was originally taken down by JewTube , about positive masculinity juxtaposed against the attacks on White culture in general .

There are some Scandinavian men with JewTube channels that have interacted with each other to bring new light to the history, traditions and music of Viking/Pagan culture. Of course they are meeting resistance from the usual culprits, but their positive message is spreading.
Bjorn Andreas Bull-Hansen has the greatest following and is a novelist, youtuber, blogger and Norseman. Here is his short bio from his youtube channel:
“I’m a novelist from Norway and I have been fascinated by the Viking Age since childhood. I like doing hands-on research of the old ways – it helps me connect with the characters in my novels. Also, I just love the outdoors life. Except being a novelist, I am also a traveler, father, bushcrafter, yachtsman, historic archer and bowmaker, and best friend to a lazy dog.”
Bjorn has several playlists on his channel that cover Vikings, politics, men’s mental health, survival and prepping, life coaching, etc., all from a Norseman’s point of view.
Bjorn’s JOMSVIKING fictional novels have been translated into several languages, but oddly not into English. There is a petition, that I have signed, for those who would like to have his novels translated into English. The JOMSVIKING series of historical novels are set to the latest decades of the Viking Age. It is the saga of Thorstein and his family.
Another interesting Norwegian, Sturla, who is a historian and DNA researcher, has a fairly recent youtube channel called Viking Stories. I include here Bjorn’s video interview with Sturla that took place in January of 2020. In this video Sturla answers questions about his DNA research into the origins of Viking culture, including possible ancient Neanderthal and Celtic connections. He also discusses how he was shunned from “official” academia due to the direction of his research not being considered “acceptable” due to modern academia’s Marxist leanings.
Unfortunately as of 4 December 2020 comes this video from Sturla.
Matthias is an American living in Germany. The name of his channel is BerserkerGang2019. He describes himself as a hands on researcher, Viking age reenactor and historical blacksmith. He has met with Bjorn to help Bjorn in the construction of his Viking cabin.
I especially enjoyed watching Matt’s recent visit to Odin’s Tree.
https://youtu.be/TdXxphfFPks
Sturla interviewed Pär Hulkoff in October 2020 and talks about musical groups that are making connections to Viking/Pagan/Nordic roots.
Here are examples of the music performed by the groups mentioned in Sturla’s interview with Hulkoff.
One final video from Bjorn, that was originally taken down by JewTube, about positive masculinity juxtaposed against the attacks on White culture in general.
Share now!


renegadetribune--2020-12-07--Hypocrite Politicians Keep Getting Caught Breaking COVID-19 Rules, Here’s a List of Them

As COVID-19 cases continue to rise across the country , the government is responding the only way they know how — arbitrary rules backed by the threat of force .
Business owners who flout lockdowns have been arrested , beaten , jailed , and even family gatherings have been raided like they are child trafficking rings .
Despite brutal lockdowns , mandates , the complete destruction of the economy , and putting the police state on steroids , cases are still rising .
Every time they rise , the politicians take to their podiums and blame the citizens for not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ force is threatened and more arbitrary rules rolled out .
Despite the utterly horrifying effects of the lockdowns , politicians across the country keep forcing them on the citizens .
Why is that ?
Well , one of the reasons these politicians are just fine and dandy with putting millions of people out of business , sparking an epidemic of depression and suicide , and locking down their states is because it doesn ’ t really have an effect on their lives at all .
Regardless of what happened to the economy , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the president , has kept their job , and received their weekly taxpayer funded paychecks — all the while getting an extended vacation — some of them literally .
On top of the fact that these politicians and government workers all keep their jobs , many of them have been caught breaking the very dictates they doled out .
After all , hypocrisy is one of the key traits to being a successful politician .
The Free Thought Project has compiled a list of politicians who ’ ve been caught breaking their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many of them , this list is not complete , but should serve as a wake up call to those who think their ostensible leaders have their best interests in mind .
In the cases below , many of these politicians advocated for throwing people in cages for the very mandates they are caught violating .
Out of the gate , the Mayor of Chicago , Lori Lightfoot was one of the heavy handed local dictators who threatened to kidnap and cage people for violating her orders — unless of course , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdown and threatening jail for violators — even people who just wanted a haircut — Lightfoot was busted going to a salon to get an illegal haircut .
Lightfoot defended the decision by saying , “ I ’ m the public face of this city and you know , I ’ m a person who [ takes ] personal hygiene very seriously and I felt like I needed to have a haircut .
So I got a haircut.
” But that is not all .
In November , Lightfoot announced another “ stay-at-home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home except for essential reasons , stop allowing guests into their homes , even if they are family , avoid travel that is non-essential , and “ cancel traditional Thanksgiving plans , ” Lightfoot said on Twitter .
According to Lightfoot , you could not have a traditional Thanksgiving .
But if she wanted to go to the Joe Biden victory gathering , at which hundreds of people would be screaming and in close proximity , this is fine and dandy .
In New York , Governor Andrew Cuomo has been seen on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — which have gotten average citizens beaten and arrested .
He ’ s even been seen hugging people while maskless .
In California , Gov .
Gavin Newson was caught and exposed flouting his own ridiculous strictures on eating in restaurants — not putting his mask back on between bites ( yes , he really mandated this ) — while breaking the size limit on gatherings .
When he was caught dining at one of the world ’ s most expensive restaurants , he lied to the public and said the table was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outing his lies .
Louisiana Gov .
Jon Bel Edwards — while forcing bars to shutter across the state — was caught on video breaking the gathering size limit while simultaneously hiring a private bar company for a political fundraiser .
Even Gov .
Grisham in New Mexico — who is now forcing grocery stores to close — has been caught breaking her own rules .
During her mandated closure of non-essential businesses , she had a store open up so she could buy jewelry .
This list goes on and on and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been at the center of this entire debacle from day one — first telling Americans not to wear masks and then pushing for a nationwide mask mandate — is not free from this hypocrisy either .
After telling the nation to mask up , Fauci was seen at the MLB game between the Washington Nationals and the New York Yankees — not wearing his mask .
When word got out , Fauci went on the offensive and called those who criticized him for it , “ mischievous ” and claimed to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drinking water .
But the picture showed that wasn ’ t true , he had his phone in both hands — not a water .
In November , Austin , Texas Mayor Steve Adler issued guidelines telling people not to gather in groups of more than 10 .
Naturally , these rules did not apply to Adler who turned around and hosted a wedding and reception with 20 guests for his daughter at a trendy hotel near downtown .
Then , Adler issued a stay-at-home order , noting that “ We need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not the time to relax .
We are going to be looking really closely .
… We may have to close things down if we are not careful.
” Again , this did not apply Adler , who then boarded his private jet bound for Cabo San Lucas , Mexico , where they vacationed for a week at a family timeshare .
Naturally , Adler claimed he did nothing wrong by breaking his own rules .
In Philadelphia , indoor dining was banned as part of COVID-19 lockdowns , unless you ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Philly Mayor Jim Kenney dined indoors in Maryland , a widely circulated photograph shows , though indoor dining was prohibited in Philadelphia .
That is not all .
While Nancy Pelosi was caught in California getting an illegal haircut , Gov .
Ralph Northam was caught maskless at Virginia Beach .
He later apologized and said “ I was not prepared.
” Photos of a celebration for Carlo Scissura , head of the powerful construction trade organization New York Building Congress , show Democrat elites flouting COVID-19 restrictions .
According to the NY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Borough President Ingrid Lewis-Martin and former Brooklyn Democratic Party Chairman Frank Seddio .

By Matt Agorist
As COVID-19 cases continue to rise across the country, the government is responding the only way they know how — arbitrary rules backed by the threat of force. Business owners who flout lockdowns have been arrested, beaten, jailed, and even family gatherings have been raided like they are child trafficking rings.
Despite brutal lockdowns, mandates, the complete destruction of the economy, and putting the police state on steroids, cases are still rising. Every time they rise, the politicians take to their podiums and blame the citizens for not following their dictates close enough. More force is threatened and more arbitrary rules rolled out. Despite the utterly horrifying effects of the lockdowns, politicians across the country keep forcing them on the citizens. Why is that?
Well, one of the reasons these politicians are just fine and dandy with putting millions of people out of business, sparking an epidemic of depression and suicide, and locking down their states is because it doesn’t really have an effect on their lives at all. Regardless of what happened to the economy, every single government worker, from cops to the president, has kept their job, and received their weekly taxpayer funded paychecks — all the while getting an extended vacation — some of them literally.
On top of the fact that these politicians and government workers all keep their jobs, many of them have been caught breaking the very dictates they doled out. After all, hypocrisy is one of the key traits to being a successful politician.
The Free Thought Project has compiled a list of politicians who’ve been caught breaking their own rules. Because there are so many of them, this list is not complete, but should serve as a wake up call to those who think their ostensible leaders have their best interests in mind. In the cases below, many of these politicians advocated for throwing people in cages for the very mandates they are caught violating.
Out of the gate, the Mayor of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot was one of the heavy handed local dictators who threatened to kidnap and cage people for violating her orders — unless of course, that person is her.
After implementing a lockdown and threatening jail for violators — even people who just wanted a haircut — Lightfoot was busted going to a salon to get an illegal haircut.
Lightfoot defended the decision by saying, “I’m the public face of this city and you know, I’m a person who [takes] personal hygiene very seriously and I felt like I needed to have a haircut. So I got a haircut.”
Mayor Lightfoot Criticized After Post Shows Her Getting Haircut During Stay-At-Home Order https://t.co/JkluWJXgdN pic.twitter.com/8jyjReRdZQ — CBS Chicago (@cbschicago) April 7, 2020
But that is not all. In November, Lightfoot announced another “stay-at-home” order which mandated that Chicagoans remain home except for essential reasons, stop allowing guests into their homes, even if they are family, avoid travel that is non-essential, and “cancel traditional Thanksgiving plans,” Lightfoot said on Twitter.
– Stay home unless for essential reasons
– Stop having guests over—including family members you do not live with
– Avoid non-essential travel
– Cancel traditional Thanksgiving plans — Mayor Lori E. Lightfoot (@chicagosmayor) November 12, 2020
According to Lightfoot, you could not have a traditional Thanksgiving. But if she wanted to go to the Joe Biden victory gathering, at which hundreds of people would be screaming and in close proximity, this is fine and dandy.
In New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo has been seen on video and photographs disobeying his own orders — which have gotten average citizens beaten and arrested. He’s even been seen hugging people while maskless.
In California, Gov. Gavin Newson was caught and exposed flouting his own ridiculous strictures on eating in restaurants — not putting his mask back on between bites (yes, he really mandated this) — while breaking the size limit on gatherings. When he was caught dining at one of the world’s most expensive restaurants, he lied to the public and said the table was outside. But photos quickly surfaced, outing his lies.
Louisiana Gov. Jon Bel Edwards — while forcing bars to shutter across the state — was caught on video breaking the gathering size limit while simultaneously hiring a private bar company for a political fundraiser.
Even Gov. Grisham in New Mexico — who is now forcing grocery stores to close — has been caught breaking her own rules. During her mandated closure of non-essential businesses, she had a store open up so she could buy jewelry.
This list goes on and on and on.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has been at the center of this entire debacle from day one — first telling Americans not to wear masks and then pushing for a nationwide mask mandate — is not free from this hypocrisy either.
After telling the nation to mask up, Fauci was seen at the MLB game between the Washington Nationals and the New York Yankees — not wearing his mask. When word got out, Fauci went on the offensive and called those who criticized him for it, “mischievous” and claimed to have pulled down the mask because he was drinking water. But the picture showed that wasn’t true, he had his phone in both hands — not a water.
In November, Austin, Texas Mayor Steve Adler issued guidelines telling people not to gather in groups of more than 10. Naturally, these rules did not apply to Adler who turned around and hosted a wedding and reception with 20 guests for his daughter at a trendy hotel near downtown.
Then, Adler issued a stay-at-home order, noting that “We need to stay home if you can. This is not the time to relax. We are going to be looking really closely. … We may have to close things down if we are not careful.” Again, this did not apply Adler, who then boarded his private jet bound for Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, where they vacationed for a week at a family timeshare.
Naturally, Adler claimed he did nothing wrong by breaking his own rules.
In Philadelphia, indoor dining was banned as part of COVID-19 lockdowns, unless you’re the mayor. In August, Philly Mayor Jim Kenney dined indoors in Maryland, a widely circulated photograph shows, though indoor dining was prohibited in Philadelphia.
That is not all.
While Nancy Pelosi was caught in California getting an illegal haircut, Gov. Ralph Northam was caught maskless at Virginia Beach. He later apologized and said “I was not prepared.”
Photos of a celebration for Carlo Scissura, head of the powerful construction trade organization New York Building Congress, show Democrat elites flouting COVID-19 restrictions. According to the NY Daily News, attendees included Deputy Brooklyn Borough President Ingrid Lewis-Martin and former Brooklyn Democratic Party Chairman Frank Seddio.
In one image, about two dozen people are seen mingling with one another in an ornate dining area while celebrating Scissura’s 50th. Only two of them are visibly wearing masks. All of this was in spite of Gov. Cuomo’s orders limiting gathering to no more than 10 people and mask mandates. In November, the Mayor of Denver, Michael Hancock told citizens to “avoid travel.” Less than an hour later, this hypocrite boarded a flight to travel to his family for Thanksgiving. The hypocritical response by the government is not at all surprising as this is what government does — do as I say, not as I do. With political leaders flaunting their above the law status, it should come as no surprise that there is massive resistance to their mandates. In my time in the Marine Corps, I learned one very important lesson about leadership. Successful leaders do not create more docile followers, they create more leaders. Successful leaders also do not lead by barking orders and telling people what to do, they lead by example. If Americans followed the examples of the alleged “leaders” in the examples above, we’d have a nation of sheep begging for their corrupt overlords to tell them what to do next. Oh, wait. This article originally appeared on The Free Thought Project.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-12-07--The Making of the Auschwitz Myth: British Intercepts, Polish Underground Reports and Postwar Testimo

The Making of the Auschwitz Myth: British Intercepts, Polish Underground Reports and Postwar Testimonies

HOLOCAUST HANDBOOKS , Volume 41 : Carlo Mattogno : The Making of the Auschwitz Myth : Auschwitz in British Intercepts , Polish Underground Reports and Postwar Testimonies ( 1941-1947 ) .
On the Genesis and Development of the Gas Chamber Lore .
Translated from the Italian by Carlos W. Porter and Germar Rudolf The latest installment in the Holocaust Handbook series was just recently published , authored by the exceptional and foremost researcher on the jewish holocaust lie Carlo Mottogno .
Many studies have been dedicated over the decades to the question of what knowledge the Allies and the neutral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of alleged exterminations of jews by the Third Reich in general .
What did the Americans know ?
Or the British ?
Or the Holy See ?
What about the International Red Cross ?
1 On the “ terrible secret ” of Auschwitz , however , the literature is rather limited .
Except for an excursion by Martin Gilbert ( Gilbert 1984 ) , Western historians have only dealt with the question of why the railway lines leading to Auschwitz were not bombed by the Anglo-Americans.2 Several Polish historians , on the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Museum , have thoroughly expatiated ( from a perspective to be explained later ) on a topic which is also one of the focal points of the present study : the messages sent out of the camp by the Auschwitz Resistance.3 In this context , the greatest expert is undoubtedly Henryk Świebocki.4 The first resistance groups in Auschwitz were formed in the second half of 1940 and multiplied during subsequent years ( see Chapter 2.1 ) .
From the outside , they were assisted by the Polish resistance movement , which was fragmented @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to sabotaging the German occupational forces , they helped the camp inmates , providing them with food and medicine .
The main organizations operating in the Auschwitz region were the Union of Armed Struggle – National Army ( Związek Walki Zbrodnie – Armia Krajowa ) , the Peasants ’ Battalions ( Bataliony Chłopskie ) , the Polish Socialist Party ( Polska Partia Socjalistyczna ) , the Polish Workers ’ Party ( Polska Partia Robotnicza ) and the Relief Committee for Concentration Camp Inmates ( Komitet Pomoc Więźniom Obozowów Koncentracyjnych ) .
These organizations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Polish civilian workers who worked in the camp .
From the latter , they received messages and information which they forwarded to the Delegatura , which was the clandestine representation , in occupied Poland , of the Polish Government-in Exile in London .
The Delegatura was organized into twenty offices ; the fifth , called “ Department of Information and Press ” ( Departament Infomacji i Prasy ) , whose code name was “ Iskra , 600 PP , ” was in charge of collecting , processing and transmitting information from the camp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thoroughly investigated by Polish historians , but the fundamental problem remains : what did the prisoners really know about the alleged extermination of jews ?
And what really were their sources ?
This study aims to answer these questions .
After giving a background on the British intercepting and deciphering of encrypted German radio messages on Auschwitz ( Part 1 ) , we will explore and discuss the dubious reports of the camp resistance and of escaped prisoners that they issued until the end of 1944 ( Part 2 ) .
This allows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ developments of the story of the Auschwitz gas chambers .
The sources , mostly in Polish , were usually examined in the original text .
This is followed in Part 3 by an examination of testimonies made within roughly the first three years after the Soviets ’ arrival at Auschwitz , hence until and including 1947 ( with some necessary exceptions ) , which is the year in which the Warsaw trial against the former Auschwitz commander Rudolf Höss and the Krakow trial against the former Auschwitz camp garrison took place .
Both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gas chamber lore that is by and large still in vogue today .
In Chapter 3.1 , I will briefly illustrate Soviet contributions to the creation of the orthodox Auschwitz narrative shortly after they occupied the camp .
In the next five chapters , I will analyze early witness testimonies .
They are ordered in five categories of decreasing historiographical importance : 1 .
Eyewitness testimonies by Sonderkommando members who claim to have worked inside and around the gas chambers .
2 .
Testimonies by inmates who worked in the crematoria without being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Testimonies of prisoners who claim to have escaped a gassing .
4 .
Testimonies of prisoners who claim to have witnessed the gas chambers accidentally .
5 .
Testimonies of prisoners who claimed to have received information directly from Sonderkommando members .
Chapter 3.7 , “ Testimonies of Prisoners Reporting Camp Rumors , ” deals with the most important testimonies of this kind recorded in the immediate postwar period ( 1945-1947 ) .
These rumors developed among former Auschwitz inmates who found themselves outside the sphere of Soviet-Polish influence .
The immediate postwar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making these stories look like history rather than fantasy , a topic examined in Part 4 , while Part 5 , “ The Connivance of Orthodox Historians : Deceptions to Hide the Lies , ” exposes the vain attempts of some orthodox Holocaust historians to justify patently false witness statements at all costs .
The present study offers a very large collection of primary sources which includes a significant number of reports and testimonies unknown to mainstream Holocaust historiography .
It is now a well-known fact that the British , at the beginning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and deciphered German radio messages at the Government Communications and Cypher School at Bletchley Park .
Orthodox Holocaust historians who have dealt with this issue , given that they start from the a priori “ fact ” that mass murder of jews in gas chambers was carried out in Auschwitz , are mainly interested in how the British interpreted the decrypts , that is what they “ knew , ” often only to accuse them of complicit silence .
Unable to deny , however , that these decrypts contain not the slightest allusion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forced to fall back on the black propaganda spread lavishly first of all by the Polish government in exile in London , which these purpose-driven historians claim should have provided them with the interpretative key to the German messages .
It is truly painful to note the childish self-assurance of the vast majority of orthodox Holocaust historians , that the Auschwitz camp authorities , every moment of every day , thought of nothing else but exterminating jews .
In the documentation of the Central Construction Office , which contains some 120,000 pages , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pressac and other orthodox historians , contain “ criminal traces , ” hardly reach 0.0005 % .
This shows how absurd their claims are to find references to gas chambers and exterminations always and everywhere .
Since the decrypts are mute about mass exterminations , Breitman is forced to resort to Polish black propaganda , thereby disclosing that this was the true origin of the Auschwitz gas-chamber story .
One of the most-frequently recurring themes in the intercepted radio messages is that concerning the health situation in Auschwitz , in particular the typhus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Several intercepts deal with the most varied aspects of life in the camp ; these intercepts provide information which was previously unknown or which clarifies or supplements aspects already known .
My discussion of them here is based upon the topics referred to .
Therefore , the British intercepts do not provide the slightest clue in favor of the idea that an extermination by means of gas chambers was being perpetrated at Auschwitz .
This idea , as Breitman perfectly understood , came exclusively from Polish black propaganda , which will be the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study .
Richard Breitman ’ s claim that “ the Polish underground reports were an important complement to , and confirmation of , British signals intelligence ” ( Breitman 1998 , p. 116 ) is false and pretentious , as I have explained in Part One of the present study .
In fact , the British intercepts do not contain the slightest allusion to any extermination of jews , so that the reports of the Polish resistance are neither a “ complement ” nor a “ confirmation ” of those intercepts , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and myths .
To sum up , the Auschwitz resistance movement , through its dense network of connections , was closely monitoring all the nerve centers of the camp and had access to all the important documents , including the crematoria ’ s construction blueprints .
The civilian workers , most of them Polish , were another precious source of information , and at the same time a primary link to the outside world .
The escaped inmates and those who had been released represented another direct source of information for the Delegatura @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Auschwitz , and it is obvious that the SS ’ s policy of granting visits to the camp by civilians and of releasing and transferring inmates can not be reconciled with the story of a mass extermination camp whose “ terrible secret ” had to be covered up with the utmost secrecy .
From the very outset , the resistance movement was therefore in possession of all the information and had a wide range of opportunities when it came to exposing the “ reality ” or “ true ” version of history @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instead of doing so , it exclusively fabricated fantasies and myths .
This fact confirms that the presumed existence of homicidal gas chambers is not a hidden truth which came to light gradually , a shadow which gradually assumed the distinguishing marks of a projected “ reality , ” but is a creation of atrocity propaganda334 that gradually transformed itself into “ truth ” and “ reality.
” Unlike other Holocaust-related themes , this story failed to coalesce into a coherent , definitive version in the post-war period , and the version we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shameless manipulations by Danuta Czech ; in fact , she sets forth a forced and fictitious reconstruction of the presumed event by selecting the very few generic elements common to the testimonies , while ignoring that they contradict each other on all essential points ( see Mattogno 2016e ) .
It is now well-established that the description of Crematoria II and III supplied by Wetzler and Vrba – both in the text and the illustration – are completely invented , as shown by a simple comparison with the original blueprint ( Document 8 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Crematoria : 1. the furnace room had five furnaces instead of nine ; 2. each furnace had three muffles instead of four ; therefore , the total number of muffles was 15 rather than 36 ; 3. the furnaces were arranged in a straight line along the longitudinal axis of the furnace room and not grouped in a semi-circle around the chimney ; 4. the room later referred to as the victims ’ undressing room ( Morgue # 2 ) was located in the basement instead of the ground floor ; 5.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ chamber ( Morgue # 1 ) was not located on the ground floor , a little bit lower than the undressing room , but in the basement and on the same level as Morgue # 2 ; 6. the room referred to as the gas chamber was linked to the furnace room by a freight elevator rather than by rails .
According to the Current Orthodox Holocaust Narrative : 7. the gas chamber had four Zyklon-B apertures instead of three ; 8. the Zyklon-B openings were mere manholes sealed by cement ( or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; 9. the story of the distribution of towels and a piece of soap is a fairy-tale ; 10. the cremation capacity of a single muffle is in contradiction to the current orthodox claim : three bodies in an hour and a half as opposed to two bodies in half an hour ( Piper 2000 , p. 164 ) ; From the Technical Point of View : 11. the cremation capacity of 2,000 bodies in 24 hours for each of Crematorium II and III , and of 1,000 for each of Crematoria IV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ total , greatly exceeds reality ; 12. as I have noted earlier , the time required for the gassing victims to die – three minutes538 – is another absurdity which appears with a few variants in almost all the “ eyewitness testimonies.
” The Wetzler-Vrba Report is of capital importance in the foundations of Auschwitz propaganda .
Having established that both the description and the plan of Crematoria II/III of the report in question are pure fantasy , it follows that the story of the extermination of the jews in homicidal gas chambers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not originate from the inmates of the socalled “ Sonderkommando , ” but was cooked up without their contribution .
And this is the proof that the whole story , as crude black propaganda , was invented by the camp resistance movement without even talking to the inmates actually working in the crematoria !
The tale told by Wetzler and Vrba , although borrowing a few themes from the phantasmagorical propaganda stories propagated in the preceding Polish reports , constitutes something completely new when compared to any of these early reports , at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and precisely for this reason it is celebrated as a revelation of the “ truth ” – which implies that the preceding reports represented revelations of an “ un-truth , ” or , if one prefers , a lie .
The Report thus revived the fantastic themes of the gas chambers camouflaged as bathing installations ( Badeanstalt ) , with fake showerheads on the walls ( ! )
– originally , real showers were attached to the ceiling , from which the “ gas ” was emitted – and repeats the ridiculous story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a small piece of soap issued by two men clad in white coats , ” which means that over the course of the inaugural gassing of 8,000 jews from Krakow in March 1943,542 each of the two men in white coats distributed 4,000 towels and 4,000 small pieces of soap to 4,000 jews !
Starting in February 1945 , various manuscripts were found on the grounds surrounding the Birkenau crematoria , allegedly written by six self-proclaimed members of the “ Sonderkommando ” : Chaim Herman , Salmen Gradowski , Leib Langfus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and Marcel Nadsari .
These manuscripts also have a place within the framework of the present study , because it is important to be aware of what these inmates knew of the claimed extermination procedure .
This is an essential problem , usually underestimated by orthodox Holocaust historians , who are always merely in search of “ proof ” for the current version of the historical fairy tale of the gas chambers , yet are unwilling or incapable of an overall objective assessment of the manuscripts .
It should be noted that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ question do not really date back to pre-January 1945 , which is confirmed by telling evidence , as we will see .
The fact that the first manuscript was found in February 1945 does not necessarily mean that it was buried at the end of 1944 , as is claimed , and this is even more true for all the other manuscripts found in later years .
Thus , in the strict meaning of the word , there is no documentary proof of the existence of Salmen Gradowski , Leib Langfus and Salmen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unknown ( let alone the “ unknown author ” ) .
But that makes the problem too complicated , so in the following analysis , I shall simply assume the basic validity of the orthodox Holocaust claims regarding the manuscripts ’ authenticity .
What is most-striking about such manuscripts is the radically false tone appearing in all of them without exception : these documents are supposed to have been written by members of the “ Sonderkommando ” for posterity in order to inform the world of the horrors of the “ death factory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the “ Sonderkommando ” who wished to unveil the “ terrible secret ” of Auschwitz , one would expect adequate documentation , such as plans of the crematoria and gas chambers , with a description of the structure and functioning of the gas chambers , a description of the structure and functioning of the cremation furnaces , lists of the supplies of coke and wood for the furnaces , numerical lists of the Zyklon-B cans used for the gassings , labels from the cans , lists of the convoys of gassed jews @ @ @ @ @ @ @ numerical lists of cremated bodies , lists of names of members of the Sonderkommando with registration numbers , lists of names of SS personnel in the crematoria , lists of names and registration numbers of the “ Sonderkommando ” members .
None of this appears in any of the manuscripts , however.551 The information on the gas chambers and gassings are so vague and so limited that they not only do not provide any new knowledge in this regard , but , without any knowledge about the current narrative of homicidal gassings , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ example , none of the manuscripts even mentions Zyklon B or hydrogen cyanide !
An important aspect of the genesis of the current orthodox narrative of the gas chambers at Auschwitz , which is constantly neglected by orthodox Holocaust historians , is that which appears in the books published in the immediate postwar period in this regard by authors who were not exposed to the current Soviet version or who were only fragmentarily familiar with it .
In this chapter , I shall undertake an analysis of five books written in the years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ex-inmate , drawn up in the form of a historical chronicle , one by the Polish publicist Stefan Tadeusz Norwid , one by the Polish-Jewish historian Filip Friedman ; the remaining two are by ex-inmates from German concentration camps , Eugen Kogon and Benedikt Kautsky , which were also written as historical chronicles .
The history of the gas chambers was born from the distortion of the hygienic sanitary installations of the reception building , which included under one roof the planned presence of 19 fumigation chambers and a shower bath for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called Buildings 5a and 5b , which consisted of a hydrogen-cyanide fumigation chamber labeled “ gas chamber ” on the blueprints , a washroom and shower bath .
The extermination procedure is a simple parody of reality : the lethal showerheads exuding gas instead of water ( with the subsequent evolution of the alleged “ gas chambers ” into rooms disguised as “ shower baths ” ) , and the hair cut off the gassing victims are a misrepresentation of the real showers registered inmates had to take regularly , whose hair had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The extraction of any precious-metal fillings or teeth from the corpses of deceased registered inmates before their cremation , on the other hand , was standard procedure at least since 1942 .
Zyklon B was in common use in Auschwitz since at least July 1940 ( see Mattogno 2015 , p. 67 ) .
The fact that it does not appear as a “ weapon of crime ” in the reports of the resistance activists before the end of May 1944 ( which is inevitable , since it can not flow instead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear sign that they simply invented and spread mere fantasies and myths .
The story of the pyres or cremation pits was also a distortion of real events : that is , the open-air cremation of registered inmates – mostly victims of a raging typhus epidemic – whose bodies could not be cremated in the little crematorium at the Main Camp either because of its low cremation capacity , or due to the numerous interruptions caused by the need for repairs .
During the second half of 1942 , these surplus corpses were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outside the Birkenau Camp north of the future Crematorium V , but they had to be exhumed and cremated later , as they threatened to poison the area ’ s fresh-water supply .
Furthermore , there existed two small burning pits in the area north of Crematorium V in the spring-summer of 1944 ( though not concurrently ) , although it is unknown what was burned there .
These distortions were elaborated in multifarious versions by the various resistance groups at Auschwitz , who in this way invented fantastic stories without ever asking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ input .
These stories were disseminated inside and outside the camp , and every witness embroidered and enriched them , adding additional fantasies .
This explains the simultaneous presence of multiple contradictory versions , the discriminating factor being the transfer of the witness from Auschwitz before the arrival of the Soviets or their presence at the camp in January 1945 and the following months ; or alternatively , the ethnic group to which they belonged , as each group with their reciprocal contacts tended to harmonize a version in a certain manner .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the official “ truth , ” not because it was any more true than the others , but merely because the Soviet and Polish investigators and the witnesses under their Polish influence were able to “ calibrate ” their narrative based on materials and documents , pruning it of the most-absurd fairy tales along the way ; in other words , since the “ setting ” of this narrative ( in a cinematographic sense ) was real , the narrative itself was considered true .
There was never any “ terrible truth ” @ @ @

HOLOCAUST HANDBOOKS, Volume 41:
Carlo Mattogno:
The Making of the Auschwitz Myth:
Auschwitz in British Intercepts, Polish Underground Reports and Postwar
Testimonies (1941-1947). On the Genesis and Development of the Gas Chamber Lore.
Translated from the Italian by Carlos W. Porter and Germar Rudolf
The latest installment in the Holocaust Handbook series was just recently published, authored by the exceptional and foremost researcher on the jewish holocaust lie Carlo Mottogno.
https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1&page_id=41
Introduction
Many studies have been dedicated over the decades to the question of what knowledge the Allies and the neutral countries had during the Second World War of alleged exterminations of jews by the Third Reich in general. What did the Americans know? Or the British? Or the Holy See? What about the International Red Cross?1 On the “terrible secret” of Auschwitz, however, the literature is rather limited. Except for an excursion by Martin Gilbert (Gilbert 1984), Western historians have only dealt with the question of why the railway lines leading to Auschwitz were not bombed by the Anglo-Americans.2 Several Polish historians, on the other hand, especially those of the Auschwitz Museum, have thoroughly expatiated (from a perspective to be explained later) on a topic which is also one of the focal points of the present study: the messages sent out of the camp by the Auschwitz Resistance.3 In this context, the greatest expert is undoubtedly Henryk Świebocki.4
The first resistance groups in Auschwitz were formed in the second half of 1940 and multiplied during subsequent years (see Chapter 2.1). From the outside, they were assisted by the Polish resistance movement, which was fragmented into various competing organizations. In addition to sabotaging the German occupational forces, they helped the camp inmates, providing them with food and medicine. The main organizations operating in the Auschwitz region were the Union of Armed Struggle – National Army (Związek Walki Zbrodnie – Armia Krajowa), the Peasants’ Battalions (Bataliony Chłopskie), the Polish Socialist Party (Polska Partia Socjalistyczna), the Polish Workers’ Party (Polska Partia Robotnicza) and the Relief Committee for Concentration Camp Inmates (Komitet Pomoc Więźniom Obozowów Koncentracyjnych).
These organizations were in contact with Auschwitz detainees through Polish civilian workers who worked in the camp. From the latter, they received messages and information which they forwarded to the Delegatura, which was the clandestine representation, in occupied Poland, of the Polish Government-in Exile in London. The Delegatura was organized into twenty offices; the fifth, called “Department of Information and Press” (Departament Infomacji i Prasy), whose code name was “Iskra, 600 PP,” was in charge of collecting, processing and transmitting information from the camp to London.
These aspects have been thoroughly investigated by Polish historians, but the fundamental problem remains: what did the prisoners really know about the alleged extermination of jews? And what really were their sources?
This study aims to answer these questions. After giving a background on the British intercepting and deciphering of encrypted German radio messages on Auschwitz (Part 1), we will explore and discuss the dubious reports of the camp resistance and of escaped prisoners that they issued until the end of 1944 (Part 2). This allows us to reconstruct the origins and contrasting developments of the story of the Auschwitz gas chambers. The sources, mostly in
Polish, were usually examined in the original text.
This is followed in Part 3 by an examination of testimonies made within roughly the first three years after the Soviets’ arrival at Auschwitz, hence until and including 1947 (with some necessary exceptions), which is the year in which the Warsaw trial against the former Auschwitz commander Rudolf Höss and the Krakow trial against the former Auschwitz camp garrison took place. Both trials molded the final version of the gas chamber lore that is by and large still in vogue today.
In Chapter 3.1, I will briefly illustrate Soviet contributions to the creation of the orthodox Auschwitz narrative shortly after they occupied the camp. In the next five chapters, I will analyze early witness testimonies. They are ordered in five categories of decreasing historiographical importance:
1. Eyewitness testimonies by Sonderkommando members who claim to have
worked inside and around the gas chambers.
2. Testimonies by inmates who worked in the crematoria without being
members of the Sonderkommando.
3. Testimonies of prisoners who claim to have escaped a gassing.
4. Testimonies of prisoners who claim to have witnessed the gas chambers
accidentally.
5. Testimonies of prisoners who claimed to have received information directly from Sonderkommando members.
Chapter 3.7, “Testimonies of Prisoners Reporting Camp Rumors,” deals with the most important testimonies of this kind recorded in the immediate postwar period (1945-1947). These rumors developed among former Auschwitz inmates who found themselves outside the sphere of Soviet-Polish influence.
The immediate postwar years also saw the first attempts at making these stories look like history rather than fantasy, a topic examined in Part 4, while Part 5, “The Connivance of Orthodox Historians: Deceptions to Hide the Lies,” exposes the vain attempts of some orthodox Holocaust historians to justify patently false witness statements at all costs.
The present study offers a very large collection of primary sources which includes a significant number of reports and testimonies unknown to mainstream Holocaust historiography.
Excerpts
It is now a well-known fact that the British, at the beginning of the Second World War, intercepted and deciphered German radio messages at the Government Communications and Cypher School at Bletchley Park. Orthodox Holocaust historians who have dealt with this issue, given that they start from the a priori “fact” that mass murder of jews in gas chambers was carried out in Auschwitz, are mainly interested in how the British interpreted the decrypts, that is what they “knew,” often only to accuse them of complicit silence. Unable to deny, however, that these decrypts contain not the slightest allusion to any homicidal gassings, they are forced to fall back on the black propaganda spread lavishly first of all by the Polish government in exile in London, which these purpose-driven historians claim should have provided them with the interpretative key to the German messages.
It is truly painful to note the childish self-assurance of the vast majority of orthodox Holocaust historians, that the Auschwitz camp authorities, every moment of every day, thought of nothing else but exterminating jews. In the documentation of the Central Construction Office, which contains some 120,000 pages, the documents that, according to J.-C. Pressac and other orthodox historians, contain “criminal traces,” hardly reach 0.0005%. This shows how absurd their claims are to find references to gas chambers and exterminations always and everywhere.
Since the decrypts are mute about mass exterminations, Breitman is forced to resort to Polish black propaganda, thereby disclosing that this was the true origin of the Auschwitz gas-chamber story. One of the most-frequently recurring themes in the intercepted radio messages is that concerning the health situation in Auschwitz, in particular the typhus epidemics which repeatedly ravaged the camp.
Several intercepts deal with the most varied aspects of life in the camp; these intercepts provide information which was previously unknown or which clarifies or supplements aspects already known. My discussion of them here is based upon the topics referred to. Therefore, the British intercepts do not provide the slightest clue in favor of the idea that an extermination by means of gas chambers was being perpetrated at Auschwitz. This idea, as Breitman perfectly understood, came exclusively from Polish black propaganda, which will be the subject of the second part of this study.
Richard Breitman’s claim that “the Polish underground reports were an important complement to, and confirmation of, British signals intelligence” (Breitman 1998, p. 116) is false and pretentious, as I have explained in Part One of the present study. In fact, the British intercepts do not contain the slightest allusion to any extermination of jews, so that the reports of the Polish resistance are neither a “complement” nor a “confirmation” of those intercepts, but are the source of the above-mentioned fantasies and myths.
To sum up, the Auschwitz resistance movement, through its dense network of connections, was closely monitoring all the nerve centers of the camp and had access to all the important documents, including the crematoria’s construction blueprints. The civilian workers, most of them Polish, were another precious source of information, and at the same time a primary link to the outside world. The escaped inmates and those who had been released represented another direct source of information for the Delegatura.
In practice, everybody knew everything at Auschwitz, and it is obvious that the SS’s policy of granting visits to the camp by civilians and of releasing and transferring inmates cannot be reconciled with the story of a mass extermination camp whose “terrible secret” had to be covered up with the utmost secrecy.
From the very outset, the resistance movement was therefore in possession of all the information and had a wide range of opportunities when it came to exposing the “reality” or “true” version of history, including any mass gassings, but instead of doing so, it exclusively fabricated fantasies and myths. This fact confirms that the presumed existence of homicidal gas chambers is not a hidden truth which came to light gradually, a shadow which gradually assumed the distinguishing marks of a projected “reality,” but is a creation of atrocity propaganda334 that gradually transformed itself into “truth” and “reality.”
Unlike other Holocaust-related themes, this story failed to coalesce into a coherent, definitive version in the post-war period, and the version we encounter today is simply the fruit of shameless manipulations by Danuta Czech; in fact, she sets forth a forced and fictitious reconstruction of the presumed event by selecting the very few generic elements common to the testimonies, while ignoring that they contradict each other on all essential points (see Mattogno 2016e).
It is now well-established that the description of Crematoria II and III supplied by Wetzler and Vrba – both in the text and the illustration – are completely invented, as shown by a simple comparison with the original blueprint (Document 8).
According to the Plans of the Crematoria:
1. the furnace room had five furnaces instead of nine;
2. each furnace had three muffles instead of four; therefore, the total number of muffles was 15 rather than 36; 3. the furnaces were arranged in a straight line along the longitudinal axis of the furnace room and not grouped in a semi-circle around the chimney;
4. the room later referred to as the victims’ undressing room (Morgue #2) was located in the basement instead of the ground floor;
5. the room referred to as the gas chamber (Morgue #1) was not located on the ground floor, a little bit lower than the undressing room, but in the basement and on the same level as Morgue #2;
6. the room referred to as the gas chamber was linked to the furnace room by a freight elevator rather than by rails.
According to the Current Orthodox Holocaust Narrative:
7. the gas chamber had four Zyklon-B apertures instead of three;
8. the Zyklon-B openings were mere manholes sealed by cement (or wooden) covers, not hermetically-sealing hatches;
9. the story of the distribution of towels and a piece of soap is a fairy-tale;
10. the cremation capacity of a single muffle is in contradiction to the current orthodox claim: three bodies in an hour and a half as opposed to two bodies in half an hour (Piper 2000, p. 164);
From the Technical Point of View:
11. the cremation capacity of 2,000 bodies in 24 hours for each of Crematorium II and III, and of 1,000 for each of Crematoria IV and V, that is 6,000 in total, greatly exceeds reality;
12. as I have noted earlier, the time required for the gassing victims to die – three minutes538 – is another absurdity which appears with a few variants in almost all the “eyewitness testimonies.”
The Wetzler-Vrba Report is of capital importance in the foundations of Auschwitz propaganda. Having established that both the description and the plan of Crematoria II/III of the report in question are pure fantasy, it follows that the story of the extermination of the jews in homicidal gas chambers repeated by the Wetzler and Vrba did not originate from the inmates of the socalled “Sonderkommando,” but was cooked up without their contribution. And this is the proof that the whole story, as crude black propaganda, was invented by the camp resistance movement without even talking to the inmates actually working in the crematoria!
The tale told by Wetzler and Vrba, although borrowing a few themes from the phantasmagorical propaganda stories propagated in the preceding Polish reports, constitutes something completely new when compared to any of these early reports, at least with regard to the results, and precisely for this reason it is celebrated as a revelation of the “truth” – which implies that the preceding reports represented revelations of an “un-truth,” or, if one prefers, a lie.
The Report thus revived the fantastic themes of the gas chambers camouflaged as bathing installations (Badeanstalt), with fake showerheads on the walls (!) – originally, real showers were attached to the ceiling, from which the “gas” was emitted – and repeats the ridiculous story that “each person receives a towel and a small piece of soap issued by two men clad in white coats,” which means that over the course of the inaugural gassing of 8,000 jews from Krakow in March 1943,542 each of the two men in white coats distributed 4,000 towels and 4,000 small pieces of soap to 4,000 jews!
Starting in February 1945, various manuscripts were found on the grounds surrounding the Birkenau crematoria, allegedly written by six self-proclaimed members of the “Sonderkommando”: Chaim Herman, Salmen Gradowski, Leib Langfus, Salmen Lewental, an “unknown author” and Marcel Nadsari.
These manuscripts also have a place within the framework of the present study, because it is important to be aware of what these inmates knew of the claimed extermination procedure. This is an essential problem, usually underestimated by orthodox Holocaust historians, who are always merely in search of “proof” for the current version of the historical fairy tale of the gas chambers, yet are unwilling or incapable of an overall objective assessment of the manuscripts.
It should be noted that it is possible that the manuscripts in question do not really date back to pre-January 1945, which is confirmed by telling evidence, as we will see. The fact that the first manuscript was found in February 1945 does not necessarily mean that it was buried at the end of 1944, as is claimed, and this is even more true for all the other manuscripts found in later years. Thus, in the strict meaning of the word, there is no documentary proof of the existence of Salmen Gradowski, Leib Langfus and Salmen Lewental, whose registration numbers are also unknown (let alone the “unknown author”). But that makes the problem too complicated, so in the following analysis, I shall simply assume the basic validity of the orthodox Holocaust claims regarding the manuscripts’ authenticity.
What is most-striking about such manuscripts is the radically false tone appearing in all of them without exception: these documents are supposed to have been written by members of the “Sonderkommando” for posterity in order to inform the world of the horrors of the “death factory” of Birkenau.
Coming from members of the “Sonderkommando” who wished to unveil the “terrible secret” of Auschwitz, one would expect adequate documentation, such as plans of the crematoria and gas chambers, with a description of the structure and functioning of the gas chambers, a description of the structure and functioning of the cremation furnaces, lists of the supplies of coke and wood for the furnaces, numerical lists of the Zyklon-B cans used for the gassings, labels from the cans, lists of the convoys of gassed jews, numerical lists of gassed persons, numerical lists of cremated bodies, lists of names of members of the Sonderkommando with registration numbers, lists of names of SS personnel in the crematoria, lists of names and registration numbers of the “Sonderkommando” members.
None of this appears in any of the manuscripts, however.551 The information on the gas chambers and gassings are so vague and so limited that they not only do not provide any new knowledge in this regard, but, without any knowledge about the current narrative of homicidal gassings, they would be downright incomprehensible. For example, none of the manuscripts even mentions Zyklon B or hydrogen cyanide!
An important aspect of the genesis of the current orthodox narrative of the gas chambers at Auschwitz, which is constantly neglected by orthodox Holocaust historians, is that which appears in the books published in the immediate postwar period in this regard by authors who were not exposed to the current Soviet version or who were only fragmentarily familiar with it. In this chapter, I shall undertake an analysis of five books written in the years 1945 and 1946: one by an ex-inmate, drawn up in the form of a historical chronicle, one by the Polish publicist Stefan Tadeusz Norwid, one by the Polish-Jewish historian Filip Friedman; the remaining two are by ex-inmates from German concentration camps, Eugen Kogon and Benedikt Kautsky, which were also written as historical chronicles.
The history of the gas chambers was born from the distortion of the hygienic sanitary installations of the reception building, which included under one roof the planned presence of 19 fumigation chambers and a shower bath for the inmates, plus two mirror-symmetrical disinfestation facilities called Buildings 5a and 5b, which consisted of a hydrogen-cyanide fumigation chamber labeled “gas chamber” on the blueprints, a washroom and shower bath.
The extermination procedure is a simple parody of reality: the lethal showerheads exuding gas instead of water (with the subsequent evolution of the alleged “gas chambers” into rooms disguised as “shower baths”), and the hair cut off the gassing victims are a misrepresentation of the real showers registered inmates had to take regularly, whose hair had been cut previously for hygienic reasons.
The extraction of any precious-metal fillings or teeth from the corpses of deceased registered inmates before their cremation, on the other hand, was standard procedure at least since 1942.
Zyklon B was in common use in Auschwitz since at least July 1940 (see Mattogno 2015, p. 67). The fact that it does not appear as a “weapon of crime” in the reports of the resistance activists before the end of May 1944 (which is inevitable, since it cannot flow instead of water from showers!) is another clear sign that they simply invented and spread mere fantasies and myths.
The story of the pyres or cremation pits was also a distortion of real events: that is, the open-air cremation of registered inmates – mostly victims of a raging typhus epidemic – whose bodies could not be cremated in the little crematorium at the Main Camp either because of its low cremation capacity, or due to the numerous interruptions caused by the need for repairs. During the second half of 1942, these surplus corpses were temporarily buried in four long mass graves outside the Birkenau Camp north of the future Crematorium V, but they had to be exhumed and cremated later, as they threatened to poison the area’s fresh-water supply. Furthermore, there existed two small burning pits in the area north of Crematorium V in the spring-summer of 1944 (though not concurrently), although it is unknown what was burned there.
These distortions were elaborated in multifarious versions by the various resistance groups at Auschwitz, who in this way invented fantastic stories without ever asking the “Sonderkommando” members for any input. These stories were disseminated inside and outside the camp, and every witness embroidered and enriched them, adding additional fantasies. This explains the simultaneous presence of multiple contradictory versions, the discriminating factor being the transfer of the witness from Auschwitz before the arrival of the Soviets or their presence at the camp in January 1945 and the following months; or alternatively, the ethnic group to which they belonged, as each group with their reciprocal contacts tended to harmonize a version in a certain manner.
The judeo Soviet-Polish narrative became established as the official “truth,” not because it was any more true than the others, but merely because the Soviet and Polish investigators and the witnesses under their Polish influence were able to “calibrate” their narrative based on materials and documents, pruning it of the most-absurd fairy tales along the way; in other words, since the “setting” of this narrative (in a cinematographic sense) was real, the narrative itself was considered true.
There was never any “terrible truth” at Auschwitz.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-12-07--Max Röder’s Magical Landscapes

Max Röder’s Magical Landscapes

Max Röder ( 1866 – 1947 ) was a German landscape artist and architectural painter who spent much of his @ @ @ @ @ work has been compared to that of Arnold Böcklin , but there is much less @ @ @ @ @ The most I was able to find about him was through a translated Wikipedia page @ @ @ @ @ considered to be a representative of a classical , coloristic and impressionistic as well as @ @ @ @ @ knew how to give his landscapes a heroic , romantic and symbolist mood .
He @ @ @ @ @ villas in Rome and the Albanian Mountains .
He composed some landscapes freely from Italian @ @ @ @ @ as a view of Mount Etna from Augustaoff – he painted true to nature .
@ @ @ @ @ his works available online , but most of them are low quality , which is @ @ @ @ @ appears to be great detail within them .

Max Röder (1866 – 1947) was a German landscape artist and architectural painter who spent much of his life working Rome. His work has been compared to that of Arnold Böcklin, but there is much less available about Röder today. The most I was able to find about him was through a translated Wikipedia page.
[He] is considered to be a representative of a classical, coloristic and impressionistic as well as poetic landscape painting. He knew how to give his landscapes a heroic, romantic and symbolist mood. He preferred to create vedute of villas in Rome and the Albanian Mountains. He composed some landscapes freely from Italian models, others – such as a view of Mount Etna from Augustaoff – he painted true to nature.
There are a few of his works available online, but most of them are low quality, which is a shame, since there appears to be great detail within them.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-12-07--“Free” Shoes Are Reparations for Slavery and Oppression

This video was from back in October , but really just goes to show the kind of people who are @ @ @ @ @ by the jewish media monopoly .
It ’ s ridiculous how a guy stealing shoes @ @ @ @ @ “ stolen ” from him as he walks out .

This video was from back in October, but really just goes to show the kind of people who are being elevated in the spotlight by the jewish media monopoly. It’s ridiculous how a guy stealing shoes has a pair of shoes “stolen” from him as he walks out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxSezIlAZXQ
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-12-07--New Study Claims Vaccinated Children Appear To Be “Significantly Less Healthy” Than Unvaccinated

What Happened : A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health has , according to the authors , discovered that vaccinated children require far more healthcare than unvaccinated children .
At least that ’ s what they found from the group of children used to collect the data .
This type of study is interesting to see given the fact that studies comparing unvaccinated children to vaccinated children are lacking , there aren ’ t many of them .
These studies are , as the authors state , “ rarely conducted.
” The study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this practice are not , overall , less healthy than the vaccinated and that indeed the vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated.
” The data source for this study was all billing and medical records of Integrative Pediatrics , a private pediatric practice located in Portland , Oregon .
The study emphasizes the need for more research given the fact that , again , there is hardly any in this area .
They concur with Mawson et al.
, 2017 , who reported : “ Further research involving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children ’ s health ” and with Hooker and Miller 2020 , who wrote : “ Further study is necessary to understand the full spectrum of health effects associated with childhood vaccination ” .
These studies mentioned above also had similar findings .
According to the authors , Vaccines are widely regarded as safe and effective within the medical community and are an integral part of the current American medical system .
While the benefits of vaccination have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and nonspecific impact of vaccines on human health have not been well studied .
Most recently , it has been determined that variation exists in individual responses to vaccines , that differences exist in the safety profile of live and inactivated vaccines , and that simultaneous administration of live and inactivated vaccines may be associated with poor outcomes .
Studies have not been published that report on the total outcomes from vaccinations , or the increase or decrease in total infections in vaccinated individuals .
This is important because , although vaccinations in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disease , what else might they be doing not only on the short term , but in the long term ?
It ’ s also important to point out that in other cases , like the HPV vaccine , there is no evidence that they do protect against the target disease .
Another great example comes from a study published in 2017 that examined the introduction of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine ( DTP ) in an urban community in Guinea-Bissau in the early 1908s .
They found that the DTP vaccine was associated with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The authors state the following : This new study points out , Pre-licensure clinical trials for vaccines can not detect long-term outcomes since safety review periods following administration are typically 42 days or less .
Long-term vaccine safety science relies on post-market surveillance studies using databases such as the US Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ’ s ) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System ( VAERS ) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink .
VAERS is a passive reporting system in which , according @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 % of vaccine adverse events are reported.
” The Vaccine Safety Datalink ( VSD ) can , in principle , according to the Institute of Medicine ( IOM , 2013 ) , be used to compare outcomes of vaccines and unvaccinated children .
Based on the IOM ’ s recommendation , in 2016 , the CDC published a white paper ( CDC , 2016 ; Glanz et al.
, 2016 ) on studying the safety of their recommended pediatric vaccine schedule .
Unfortunately , to date , no studies have been published @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and unvaccinated children .
Below is one of many interesting graphs from the study .
The orange line represents the vaccinated children , and the blue one represents the unvaccinated .
For methods used , limitations , and more please refer to the study .
The parents that I work with in New York , that I see around the country are very concerned that their rights are being taken away , that their knowledge about the science is being pushed away by an agenda that only says , unvaccinated children are a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done in this country , appropriately , to address the health outcomes of children who are vaccinated versus the children who are unvaccinated .
I have been seeing families in my practice for over 20 years , that have opted out of vaccination , they are the healthiest children I ’ ve ever seen .
– Dr. Lawrence Palevsky , a NY licensed paediatrician Why This Is Important : Given the fact that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act ( NCVIA ) has paid out approximately $ 4 billion dollars to families of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in my opinion , some valid points here , especially against compulsory vaccinations .
Again , as mentioned above , VAERS only accounts for an estimated 1 percent of vaccine injuries , this one percent is what is recorded .
A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research ( AHCR ) found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury , a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million .
Take the MMR vaccine for example , if you search on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles , mumps , and rubella vaccines alone was : 93,929 adverse events , 1,810 disabilities , 6,902 hospitalizations , and 463 deaths .
Again , don ’ t forget about that 1 % figure cited in the study .
There are a number of legitimate concerns about vaccine safety that would require quite a long and very in-depth article , but I just wanted to let the reader know here briefly .
Aluminum for example , is another concern I ’ ve written quite a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasons as to why vaccine hesitancy is at an all time high , even among many physicians and scientists .
This has actually been observed for a while .
For example , one study published in the journal EbioMedicine in 2013 outlines this point , stating in the introduction : At a 2019 conference on vaccines put on by the World Health Organization this fact was emphasized by Professor Heidi Larson , a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project .
She is referenced , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authors in the study above .
At the conference , she emphasized that safety concerns among people and health professionals seem to be the biggest issue regarding vaccine hesitancy .
Is there not enough information here alone to warrant informed consent ?
I have a hard time understanding how someone who would take the new COVID-19 vaccine , for example , would be worried about me contracting the virus if they are protected ?
Why have we given governments the ability to mandate such actions ?
Why have we given them so much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how we want to live ?
Is this really how we want to live , is this really the kind of world we want to create ?
[ … ]

By
What Happened: A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health has, according to the authors, discovered that vaccinated children require far more healthcare than unvaccinated children. At least that’s what they found from the group of children used to collect the data.
This type of study is interesting to see given the fact that studies comparing unvaccinated children to vaccinated children are lacking, there aren’t many of them. These studies are, as the authors state, “rarely conducted.”
None of the post licensure-vaccine safety studies have included comparisons to groups completely unexposed to vaccines.
The study concludes that “the unvaccinated children in this practice are not, overall, less healthy than the vaccinated and that indeed the vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated.”
The data source for this study was all billing and medical records of Integrative Pediatrics, a private pediatric practice located in Portland, Oregon.
The study emphasizes the need for more research given the fact that, again, there is hardly any in this area. They concur with Mawson et al., 2017 , who reported: “Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health” and with Hooker and Miller 2020, who wrote: “Further study is necessary to understand the full spectrum of health effects associated with childhood vaccination”.
These studies mentioned above also had similar findings.
According to the authors,
Vaccines are widely regarded as safe and effective within the medical community and are an integral part of the current American medical system. While the benefits of vaccination have been estimated in numerous studies, negative and nonspecific impact of vaccines on human health have not been well studied. Most recently, it has been determined that variation exists in individual responses to vaccines, that differences exist in the safety profile of live and inactivated vaccines, and that simultaneous administration of live and inactivated vaccines may be associated with poor outcomes. Studies have not been published that report on the total outcomes from vaccinations, or the increase or decrease in total infections in vaccinated individuals.
This is important because, although vaccinations in some cases may protect against the target disease, what else might they be doing not only on the short term, but in the long term? It’s also important to point out that in other cases, like the HPV vaccine, there is no evidence that they do protect against the target disease.
Another great example comes from a study published in 2017 that examined the introduction of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP) in an urban community in Guinea-Bissau in the early 1908s. They found that the DTP vaccine was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. The authors state the following:
All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though (this) vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.
This new study points out,
Pre-licensure clinical trials for vaccines cannot detect long-term outcomes since safety review periods following administration are typically 42 days or less. Long-term vaccine safety science relies on post-market surveillance studies using databases such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC’s) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink. VAERS is a passive reporting system in which, according to Ross 2011 , “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) can, in principle, according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2013), be used to compare outcomes of vaccines and unvaccinated children. Based on the IOM’s recommendation, in 2016, the CDC published a white paper (CDC, 2016; Glanz et al., 2016) on studying the safety of their recommended pediatric vaccine schedule. Unfortunately, to date, no studies have been published comparing a diversity of outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Below is one of many interesting graphs from the study. The orange line represents the vaccinated children, and the blue one represents the unvaccinated.
For methods used, limitations, and more please refer to the study.
The parents that I work with in New York, that I see around the country are very concerned that their rights are being taken away, that their knowledge about the science is being pushed away by an agenda that only says, unvaccinated children are a problem. No study has every been done in this country, appropriately, to address the health outcomes of children who are vaccinated versus the children who are unvaccinated. I have been seeing families in my practice for over 20 years, that have opted out of vaccination, they are the healthiest children I’ve ever seen. – Dr. Lawrence Palevsky, a NY licensed paediatrician
Why This Is Important: Given the fact that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) has paid out approximately $4 billion dollars to families of vaccine injured children, there are clearly, in my opinion, some valid points here, especially against compulsory vaccinations. Again, as mentioned above, VAERS only accounts for an estimated 1 percent of vaccine injuries, this one percent is what is recorded.
A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million.
Take the MMR vaccine for example, if you search on VAERS, as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. Again, don’t forget about that 1% figure cited in the study.
There are a number of legitimate concerns about vaccine safety that would require quite a long and very in-depth article, but I just wanted to let the reader know here briefly. Aluminum for example, is another concern I’ve written quite a lot about.
These are a few reasons as to why vaccine hesitancy is at an all time high, even among many physicians and scientists. This has actually been observed for a while. For example, one study published in the journal EbioMedicine in 2013 outlines this point, stating in the introduction:
Over the past two decades several vaccine controversies have emerged in various countries, including France, inducing worries about severe adverse effects and eroding confidence in health authorities, experts and science. These two dimensions are at the core of vaccine hesitancy (VH) observed in the general population. VH is defined as delay in acceptance of vaccination, or refusal, or even acceptance with doubts about its safety and benefits, with all these behaviours and attitudes varying according to context , vaccine and personal profile, despite the availability of vaccine services VH presents a challenge to physicians who must address their patients’ concerns about vaccines and ensure satisfactory vaccination coverage.
At a 2019 conference on vaccines put on by the World Health Organization this fact was emphasized by Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project. She is referenced, as you can see, by the authors in the study above. At the conference, she emphasized that safety concerns among people and health professionals seem to be the biggest issue regarding vaccine hesitancy.
She also stated,
The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers, we have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem, because to this day any study I’ve seen… still, the most trusted person on any study I’ve seen globally is the health care provider…
Is there not enough information here alone to warrant informed consent? I have a hard time understanding how someone who would take the new COVID-19 vaccine, for example, would be worried about me contracting the virus if they are protected?
Why have we given governments the ability to mandate such actions? Why have we given them so much power to dictate what we do and how we want to live? Is this really how we want to live, is this really the kind of world we want to create? […]
This article originally appeared on Collective Evolution.