renegadetribune--2020-04-24--The Future of a Free Humanity Depends on Our Actions Today

One of the unfortunate aspects of the human experience is our seeming inability to understand the importance of world events while we are living through them .
Hindsight is 20/20 , we are told—a phrase meant to indicate “ things are obvious that were not obvious from the outset ; one is able to evaluate past choices more clearly than at the time of the choice.
” This is why some people look upon the time before their birth or previous generations as stories from a distant past with little relation to our current reality .
Extremely impactful events from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last century , can appear both monumentally important , yet also detached from daily reality .
I fear that while many people understand the obvious magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic , there are far less people who recognize the truly historic nature of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic .
The governments of the world and the official “ authoritative ” sources are doing what every experienced politician does best : never let a good crisis go to waste .
Understandably , the world has been focused on surviving a pandemic , social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the proponents of mass surveillance and increased state power have been scoring major gains while we are occupied .
Let ’ s take a brief look at some of what has transpired in recent months .
The roll out of the 5th Generation of telecommunications technology aka 5G progressed even further on the legislative side with President Trump recently signing two bills which are aimed at securing America ’ s 5G infrastructure .
Although the two bills , the Secure 5G and Beyond Act and the Broadband Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability Act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 5G roll out , they are another step in the expansion of the technology .
The promises of faster downloads and virtual reality gadgets should be dismissed and 5G should be seen for what it truly is : the backbone to the digital “ smart ” surveillance grid also known as the Internet of Things .
Another area where the surveillance state is expanding relates more directly to the fight against COVID-19 .
Specifically , the $ 2 trillion stimulus package that was signed by Donald Trump , and supported by both @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the criminal Federal Reserve , allocates funding for telehealth and telemedicine services which will surely be powered by a 5G Smart Grid , and creates a fund for development of vaccines .
The stimulus package also expands the powers of the The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) .
Business Insider described the situation with the title , The CDC would set up a coronavirus ‘ surveillance and data collection system ’ as part of the Senate ’ s $ 2 trillion stimulus bill , an exploration of new surveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the name of fighting the virus .
“ Of the funding allocated to the CDC , the bill sets aside at least $ 500 million for public health data surveillance and modernizing the analytics infrastructure .
The CDC must report on the development of a “ surveillance and data collection system ” within the next 30 days , ” Business Insider reported on the CARES Act .
“ While it ’ s not clear what form that surveillance system will take , the federal government has reportedly expressed interest in aggregating data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and smartphone use to monitor movement patterns.
” The fight against COVID-19 has also lead to politicians and media pundits calling for the introduction or expansion of different forms of surveillance as weapons in the fight against coronavirus .
Rolling Stone described a power grab by the Department of Justice with DOJ Wants to Suspend Certain Constitutional Rights During Coronavirus Emergency , while Forbes wrote Coronavirus Could Infect Privacy And Civil Liberties Forever .
Even VICE called out the politricks with their blunt title COVID-19 Could Provide Cover for Domestic Surveillance Expansion .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ more surveillance and violations of civil liberties there have also been attempts to completely erode protections offered by encrypted messaging and email platforms .
According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation , the EARN IT Act of 2020 would “ strip Section 230 protections away from any website that doesn ’ t follow a list of best practices , ” meaning those sites can be sued into bankruptcy .
The “ best practices ” list will be created by a government commission , headed by Attorney General Barr , who has made it very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ encryption , and guarantee law enforcement “ legal access ” to every digital message .
The bill was heavily debated in early March but has since stalled , however , we should remain vigilant and not allow ourselves to be distracted by the constant focus on COVID-19 .
It should be noted that the bill was introduced with bipartisan support from Senators Lindsey Graham ( R-SC ) and Richard Blumenthal ( D-CT ) .
The aforementioned topics are just the tip of the iceberg .
In the last 4 months since this pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seen the following : • discussion of immunity passports , certificates , or badges in order to travel or go back to work • door-to-door searches and checkpoints looking for the potentially infected • discussion of vaccinations for 7 billion people before returning to “ normal ” • QR Codes to determine an individuals rating and immunity • beating of citizens in India ( and other civil rights abuses ) • mass spraying of people with disinfectant ( and here ) • fever detecting surveillance drones , some which scold people for being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1 , 2 ) that conflicts with the official statements of the World Health Organization • a consistent push in the media for a “ new normal ” which might include elements of all of the above As noted above , it ’ s often difficult to understand the importance of a moment in time in the grand scheme of human history .
Sure , we understand that this pandemic is carving a new path for our species , especially in regards to medicine and health , but what of the obvious attempts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seize even more power ?
And when I say authoritarian , I am not speaking only of China or a distant far off nation in the “ third world ” , I am also speaking of the United States , the UK , France , Italy , Spain , etc .
We are witnessing another brick in the wall that will entrap the free people of the world in a Technocratic State where biometrics , facial recognition , immunity passports , drones flying overhead , and mass censorship are the new normal in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the world are making their move and they are using the cover of COVID-19 to implement their vision .
The only way we will make it out of this precarious situation is to continue to educate our loved ones and community .
We can not simply stay in our “ woke ” bubbles and preach to the choir .
We appear to have an increasingly limited window of time to reach the masses and we must take the opportunity or risk failing to achieve a truly awakened humanity .
Please make an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , family , and other people you may be interacting with online .
Together we can change the story that is unfolding in front of our eyes .
We can create a better world .
However , it will not happen without an immense effort and cooperation the likes of which we have never seen .
This is the greatest task of our generation—no matter what your age or date of birth—it ’ s our time to shift the path of humanity and do what is necessary to protect the coming generations .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on our actions today .

By Derrick Broze
One of the unfortunate aspects of the human experience is our seeming inability to understand the importance of world events while we are living through them.
Hindsight is 20/20, we are told—a phrase meant to indicate “things are obvious that were not obvious from the outset; one is able to evaluate past choices more clearly than at the time of the choice.”
This is why some people look upon the time before their birth or previous generations as stories from a distant past with little relation to our current reality. Extremely impactful events from the last decade, let alone the last century, can appear both monumentally important, yet also detached from daily reality.
I fear that while many people understand the obvious magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic, there are far less people who recognize the truly historic nature of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The governments of the world and the official “authoritative” sources are doing what every experienced politician does best: never let a good crisis go to waste.
Understandably, the world has been focused on surviving a pandemic, social distancing, and quarantines. However, the proponents of mass surveillance and increased state power have been scoring major gains while we are occupied. Let’s take a brief look at some of what has transpired in recent months.
The roll out of the 5th Generation of telecommunications technology aka 5G progressed even further on the legislative side with President Trump recently signing two bills which are aimed at securing America’s 5G infrastructure. Although the two bills, the Secure 5G and Beyond Act and the Broadband Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability Act, don’t explicitly speed up the 5G roll out, they are another step in the expansion of the technology. The promises of faster downloads and virtual reality gadgets should be dismissed and 5G should be seen for what it truly is: the backbone to the digital “smart” surveillance grid also known as the Internet of Things.
Another area where the surveillance state is expanding relates more directly to the fight against COVID-19. Specifically, the $2 trillion stimulus package that was signed by Donald Trump, and supported by both parties, includes billions of dollars to the criminal Federal Reserve, allocates funding for telehealth and telemedicine services which will surely be powered by a 5G Smart Grid, and creates a fund for development of vaccines. The stimulus package also expands the powers of the The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Business Insider described the situation with the title, The CDC would set up a coronavirus ‘surveillance and data collection system’ as part of the Senate’s $2 trillion stimulus bill, an exploration of new surveillance powers to be granted to the CDC in the name of fighting the virus.
“Of the funding allocated to the CDC, the bill sets aside at least $500 million for public health data surveillance and modernizing the analytics infrastructure. The CDC must report on the development of a “surveillance and data collection system” within the next 30 days,” Business Insider reported on the CARES Act. “While it’s not clear what form that surveillance system will take, the federal government has reportedly expressed interest in aggregating data that can be gleaned from tech platforms and smartphone use to monitor movement patterns.”
The fight against COVID-19 has also lead to politicians and media pundits calling for the introduction or expansion of different forms of surveillance as weapons in the fight against coronavirus. Rolling Stone described a power grab by the Department of Justice with DOJ Wants to Suspend Certain Constitutional Rights During Coronavirus Emergency, while Forbes wrote Coronavirus Could Infect Privacy And Civil Liberties Forever. Even VICE called out the politricks with their blunt title COVID-19 Could Provide Cover for Domestic Surveillance Expansion.
Amidst these headlines discussing the calls for more surveillance and violations of civil liberties there have also been attempts to completely erode protections offered by encrypted messaging and email platforms. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the EARN IT Act of 2020 would “strip Section 230 protections away from any website that doesn’t follow a list of best practices,” meaning those sites can be sued into bankruptcy. The “best practices” list will be created by a government commission, headed by Attorney General Barr, who has made it very clear that he would like to ban encryption, and guarantee law enforcement “legal access” to every digital message. The bill was heavily debated in early March but has since stalled, however, we should remain vigilant and not allow ourselves to be distracted by the constant focus on COVID-19. It should be noted that the bill was introduced with bipartisan support from Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT).
The aforementioned topics are just the tip of the iceberg.
In the last 4 months since this pandemic has swept around the world we have seen the following:
As noted above, it’s often difficult to understand the importance of a moment in time in the grand scheme of human history. Sure, we understand that this pandemic is carving a new path for our species, especially in regards to medicine and health, but what of the obvious attempts by authoritarian governments of the world to seize even more power? And when I say authoritarian, I am not speaking only of China or a distant far off nation in the “third world”, I am also speaking of the United States, the UK, France, Italy, Spain, etc.
We are witnessing another brick in the wall that will entrap the free people of the world in a Technocratic State where biometrics, facial recognition, immunity passports, drones flying overhead, and mass censorship are the new normal in the new world order. The tyrants of the world are making their move and they are using the cover of COVID-19 to implement their vision. The only way we will make it out of this precarious situation is to continue to educate our loved ones and community.
We cannot simply stay in our “woke” bubbles and preach to the choir. We appear to have an increasingly limited window of time to reach the masses and we must take the opportunity or risk failing to achieve a truly awakened humanity. Please make an honest effort to communicate with your friends, family, and other people you may be interacting with online.
Together we can change the story that is unfolding in front of our eyes. We can create a better world. However, it will not happen without an immense effort and cooperation the likes of which we have never seen. This is the greatest task of our generation—no matter what your age or date of birth—it’s our time to shift the path of humanity and do what is necessary to protect the coming generations.
The future of a free humanity depends on our actions today.
By Derrick Broze | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-04-25--The Real Case for Auschwitz: Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving Trial Critically Reviewed

Between January 11 and April 11 , 2000 , a lawsuit proceeded before the Royal Court of Justice in London as a result of David Irving having sued Deborah Lipstadt and the publishing house Penguin Books Ltd. for libel .
It ended with the dismissal of the British historian ’ s claims .
Robert Jan van Pelt had been entrusted by the defense team with the preparation of an “ expert opinion ” which he presented in 1999 .
It became known as the “ The Pelt Report.
” The author later rewrote it together with his affidavit for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it in the form of a book , The Case for Auschwitz , which became the new reference work of orthodox Holocaust historiography in this field .
In doing so , van Pelt succeeded Jean-Claude Pressac who by that time had become an uncontrollable maverick dealing official historiography blow upon blow .
Pressac was therefore consigned to what might be labeled historiographic purgatory , halfway between the revisionists ’ hell and the paradise of the Holocaust faithful .
This historiographic interdict weighed upon him until he died on July 23 , 2003 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which had previously praised him to the skies .
The irony of fate would have it that on his death he was eulogized only by his erstwhile opponents .
The post of the world-wide authority on Auschwitz had thus to be filled by a trustworthy person who would promote Pressac ’ s purified theses without the latter ’ s annoying spirit of criticism and bring about a new metaphysical vision of Auschwitz , immutable and definitive this time – van Pelt , in short .
“ The Pelt Report ” and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is essentially a plundering of Pressac ’ s work , but the man himself is never mentioned as the source of the arguments which van Pelt has hijacked .
The entire work rests upon two main pillars : the corpus of “ criminal traces ” assembled by Pressac , and the testimonies of the witnesses , which center , in turn , on the declarations made by Henryk Tauber ( see Chapter 10 ) , a former detainee and member of the so-called Sonderkommando .
Van Pelt presents them as having “ the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pressac ’ s analysis of these declarations his own .
Van Pelt , however , has greatly inflated Tauber ’ s significance , making him the mainstay of his argumentation , the touchstone of all sources to the point where he even uses his own documents to bolster the “ plausibility ” of Tauber ’ s declarations .
This is true as well for the other testimonies which cluster around Tauber ’ s statements for the sole purpose of “ confirming ” them .
It is easy to see why van Pelt does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constituted the seemingly unassailable basis of orthodox Holocaust historiography as far as cremations and homicidal gassings at Auschwitz are concerned – from 1945 to 1993 , from Jan Sehn to Pressac .
Pressac ’ s own “ criminal traces ” rely tacitly or explicitly on Tauber ’ s assertions and merely constitute , as it were , their ( utterly baseless ) documentary rendition .
Van Pelt ’ s strategy has another , more important motive : he had to deal with technical problems in the field of cremation and cremation furnaces with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so he blindly followed Tauber ’ s statements .
By accepting the absurdities uttered by this witness , however , and by making them the basis of his own reasoning , van Pelt has adopted a chain of reasoning which renders his entire argument specious .
The radical refutation of van Pelt ’ s argumentation therefore requires three specific approaches : one concerning the “ criminal traces , ” another concerning the cremations and cremation furnaces , and a third concerning Tauber ’ s testimony .
They will constitute the first , second @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work , respectively .
Compared to Pressac , van Pelt has introduced a new paradigm or rather a new designation for a paradigm , the “ convergence of evidence ” – a paradigm which Pressac had already utilized without giving it a specific name .
It consists in the contemplation of allegedly independent documents and testimonies in an effort to show that everything “ converges ” to confirm the thesis of an extermination .
Part Four examines the practical application of this paradigm by van Pelt and lays bare the serious technical and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Part Five finally analyzes in detail the origins of the alleged convergence of testimonies .
This book constitutes the first complete and radical dismantling of the intrinsically false argumentative structure and of the spearhead of orthodox Holocaust historiography about Auschwitz by demonstrating , on the one hand , that Pressac ’ s “ criminal traces ” have no value as evidence and , on the other , by documenting the fact that van Pelt ’ s “ convergence of proof ” is purely void of argumentative meaning .
As against this , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ converging set of evidentiary elements which show that the orthodox Holocaust thesis regarding the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz is historically , documentarily and technically unfounded .
Jean-Claude Pressac may rightly be called the founder of orthodox Holocaust historiography on the subject of Auschwitz , which previously had functioned without documentation and without any method .
He himself called the “ traditional ” treatment of the subject “ a history based for the most part on testimonies , assembled according to the mood of the moment , truncated to fit an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ German documents of uneven value and without any connection with one another.
” ( 1989 , p. 264 ) He applied a new historiographic method which , at least in its intentions , slighted testimony in favor of documentary material .
Actually , though , he again relied on testimony to retrace the history of the alleged initial installations for homicidal gassings , which are said to have preceded those of the Birkenau Crematoria .
His chapters on the gassings in Crematorium I ( ibid.
, pp .
123-159 ) and in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ibid.
, pp .
161-182 ) are , in fact , exclusively based on testimony .
The new method was actually applied solely to the Birkenau Crematoria .
Whereas Pressac should have been able to discover proof of the planning , construction and use of the alleged homicidal gas chambers in those installations , in the pertinent documentation preserved at the Auschwitz Museum , he found no proof of any kind .
He was merely able to identify some “ criminal traces ” which somehow , by their number and their presumed convergence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Later on , in the early 1990s , when he was able to peruse the enormous trove of documents secured by the Soviets at Auschwitz and held in Moscow , Pressac wrote a new book in which he succeeded in adding nothing but a few more circumstantial indicators to his existing collection ( Pressac 1993 ) .
But at precisely that point Pressac ’ s historiographic fortunes started to decline .
Van Pelt ’ s assault began the following year , when his name was inexplicably added to Pressac ’ s in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book ( Pressac/van Pelt 1994 ) .
It continued in 1996 , when van Pelt appropriated Pressac ’ s “ criminal traces ” as his own in a book he wrote with Debórah Dwork ( Dwork/van Pelt 1996 ) , and culminated in 2000 at the Irving Lipstadt Trial .
By 2002 the expropriation was complete .
The Case for Auschwitz presents a full-fledged rehash of Pressac ’ s “ criminal traces , ” which now constitute the framework of orthodox Holocaust historiography concerning Auschwitz .
Whereas Pressac was an investigator , van @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a much weaker critical bent and much less-gifted for historical and documental analyses .
His reassessment of the “ criminal traces ” represents a simpler way of spreading Pressac ’ s theses and does not take into account their complexity and variations .
Hence , replying directly to van Pelt ’ s purloined arguments makes no sense .
Various revisionist scholars have examined Pressac ’ s theses ( see in particular Verbeke ; English as Rudolf 2016c ) , but until now there has been no systematic and comprehensive assessment of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criminal traces , ” an analysis which would , at the same time , confer a new character to van Pelt ’ s comments .
The problem of the cremations at Auschwitz – one of the most important and still unresolved questions in the historiography of that camp – had started to come out of the general hysteria , into which it had been relegated for decades , and had started to take on some scientific connotations only in 1989 , thanks to Jean-Claude Pressac .
The merits of the French researcher end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indeed try to approach the problem from a scientific standpoint , his argumentative procedure and his conclusions show his crippling lack of technical training , which I shall discuss in Chapter 9 .
A rigorous scientific treatment of the matter became an urgent need .
Since the early 1990s I have been working on such an opus , assisted by engineer Dr. Franco Deana .
The English translation titled The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz : A Technical and Historical Study finally appeared in 2015.355 In the context of the present study , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lines .
This issue is important because , since the turn of the millennium , the problem of the Auschwitz cremations has relapsed into the propagandistic hysteria of the immediate post-war years .
As I have explained above , the question of the cremation furnaces of Auschwitz-Birkenau is one of the three pillars which support the entire argumentative structure of van Pelt ’ s book .
One could even go so far as to say that it is the most important pillar , because the reliability of the witness testimonies is closely linked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ respect of the cremation furnaces .
If the latter breaks down , the “ convergence of proof ” between witnesses and documents necessarily follows , and thus van Pelt ’ s entire argumentative structure collapses .
The problem is hence of prime importance .
I will therefore offer the reader in the present part of this book first and foremost a synthesis of the conclusions of the work in question and of an article I wrote on the Auschwitz furnaces ( 1994b , updated in Rudolf 2000 and 2003 ) with its major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ modifications to the final results of my study of cremation .
The first version of said article has been criticized by a certain John C. Zimmerman in a text entitled Body Disposal at Auschwitz : The End of Holocaust Denial , which appeared on a website in 1999 and was partly incorporated into his book a year later .
My reply to Zimmerman ’ s historically wrong and technically nonsensical arguments has been ignored by him so far ( Mattogno 2017c ) .
Henryk Tauber was one of the most important witnesses during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Warsaw , March 11 through 19 , 1947 .
However , for unknown reasons he did not participate directly in the debates and did not even testify during the trial of the camp garrison , which later took place at Cracow from November 25 to December 16 , 1947 .
His testimony , as attached to the proceedings of the Höss Trial , consisted of the minutes of a deposition which Tauber had made before the Investigating Judge Sehn on May 24 , 1945 ( Tauber 1945b ) .
This testimony became @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the alleged method of extermination which the tribunal established ; it was taken over as such by the incipient Polish historiography for its historical representation of the events .
Tauber ’ s testimony remained unknown for decades in Western historiography , until Pressac rediscovered it in 1989 in the records of the Höss Trial .
In his voluminous work on Auschwitz , the French historian presented , in fact , a full translation into English together with his own detailed comments ( 1989 hereafter , if not stated otherwise , pp .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is somewhat questionable , came from his own adaptation of two French versions prepared for him by Dorota Ryszka on one hand and Adam Rutkowski on the other ( p. 481 ) .
For that reason , I have used my own translation of the Polish text into Italian ( translated into English for the purposes of this book ) .
Pressac held Tauber in high esteem , calling him “ an exceptional witness , ” “ being 95 % historically reliable ” ( pp .
380 , 481 ) and stated ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the exceptional validity of his testimony is how well it corresponds with the historical material available now that was not available in May 1945.
” Pressac ’ s assessment left its imprint on all later elements of orthodox Holocaust historiography , which lost no time in spreading Tauber ’ s testimony .
In 1995 Piper incorporated it in its original language into the five-volume history of the camp , later translated into German and English ( Długoborski/Piper 1995 , Vol .
III , pp .
189-208 ) .
Van Pelt propounds on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arrogance and ignorance .
He labels opposing works “ an insult to the intellect ” ( p. 69 ) and maligns its alleged incapacity to present a historiographic alternative ( p. 318 ) : “ The negationists claim to be revisionist historians , but they have yet to produce a history that offers a credible , ‘ revised ’ explanation of the events in question.
” This is exactly what I have done in the present work as well as in the numerous studies mentioned herein .
Many of them had appeared prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some even in English .
Still , while van Pelt discusses the theses of all other revisionists who have ever written a few pages on the subject of Auschwitz , he never discusses any of my various studies with even a single word either in “ The Pelt Report ” or in The Case for Auschwitz .
His neglect is obviously intentional .
In October of 1999 , as stated in Subchapter 8.1 above , John C. Zimmerman published a critique of the English-language internet version of my article “ The Crematoria Ovens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
I replied to his unfounded accusations with the article “ John C. Zimmerman and ‘ Body Disposal at Auschwitz ’ : Preliminary Observations , ” in which I documented Zimmerman ’ s historical , technical and documental incompetence as well as his glaring bad faith .
After my reply he wrote another even sillier article “ My Response to Carlo Mattogno.
” I immediately wrote a long and detailed response – “ Supplementary Response to John C. Zimmerman on his ‘ Body disposal at Auschwitz ’ ” – in which I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s claims .
This reply was posted on the web in the year 2000 .
John C. Zimmerman has kept quiet ever since .
He did publish a book in the same year with a number of critical remarks leveled against me , but this was simply a rehash of the historical and technical hot air of his previous articles .
In spite of this , in a later study I refuted his fanciful analyses of the Birkenau aerial photographs he showed ( 2016d , pp .
50-79 ) .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to oppose anything to my final reply , and his silence reflects an unconditional surrender on his part , an admission that his arguments were unfounded and unsustainable , and remain so .
We must remember that this Zimmerman was one of van Pelt ’ s advisors .
In view of the fact that the problem of the cremations has a fundamental significance within van Pelt ’ s domain of an alleged “ convergence of evidence , ” as I already underlined , can one seriously believe that the two men did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clearly , they must have come to the conclusion that it was safer not to deal with any questions which they could not handle and which would have threatened to topple van Pelt ’ s already shaky system of proof .
And for the same reason they felt that it would be preferable not to deal at all with any of my studies .
In order not to mention me , van Pelt even refrained from citing my three detailed articles exposing Samuel Crowell ’ s thesis as mistaken , according to which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ point to the design and construction of air raid shelters in the crematoria of Birkenau ( 1999 , 2000b , 2001b ) .
Crowell ’ s thesis was so important to van Pelt that he dedicated thirteen pages to its discussion in an attempt to refute it .
A reference to my articles would have saved him a lot of ink ; but no , he had to avoid Mattogno like the plague .
Ignoring scholarly works of central importance to an issue , though , is firstrate evidence for unscientific behavior , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as scientifically worthless already for that reason .
The accusation launched by van Pelt against revisionists in general , hence also against me , can therefore easily be deflected : his study of Auschwitz has no scientific and historiographic value , – because it ignores works of crucial importance ; – because it does not even mention essential opposing views and arguments ; – because it fails to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means ; – because it is highly inconsistent ; – because it uses deceptive methods ; – because it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; – because it reveals a decidedly threadbare knowledge of the camp ’ s history ; – because it distorts all sources to serve the alleged “ extermination ” aspects of Auschwitz ; – and because even regarding the claimed “ extermination ” aspects it exhibits an incomplete and superficial grasp of the subject .
The Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work ; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources .

By Carlo Mattogno
Author’s Preface
Between January 11 and April 11, 2000, a lawsuit proceeded before the Royal Court of Justice in London as a result of David Irving having sued Deborah Lipstadt and the publishing house Penguin Books Ltd. for libel. It ended with the dismissal of the British historian’s claims. Robert Jan van Pelt had been entrusted by the defense team with the preparation of an “expert opinion” which he presented in 1999. It became known as the “The Pelt Report.” The author later rewrote it together with his affidavit for the appeal procedure, and in 2002 published it in the form of a book, The Case for Auschwitz, which became the new reference work of orthodox Holocaust historiography in this field.
In doing so, van Pelt succeeded Jean-Claude Pressac who by that time had become an uncontrollable maverick dealing official historiography blow upon blow. Pressac was therefore consigned to what might be labeled historiographic purgatory, halfway between the revisionists’ hell and the paradise of the Holocaust faithful. This historiographic interdict weighed upon him until he died on July 23, 2003, to the total silence of the media, which had previously praised him to the skies. The irony of fate would have it that on his death he was eulogized only by his erstwhile opponents.
The post of the world-wide authority on Auschwitz had thus to be filled by a trustworthy person who would promote Pressac’s purified theses without the latter’s annoying spirit of criticism and bring about a new metaphysical vision of Auschwitz, immutable and definitive this time – van Pelt, in short.
“The Pelt Report” and the book which resulted from it constitute what is essentially a plundering of Pressac’s work, but the man himself is never mentioned as the source of the arguments which van Pelt has hijacked. The entire work rests upon two main pillars: the corpus of “criminal traces” assembled by Pressac, and the testimonies of the witnesses, which center, in turn, on the declarations made by Henryk Tauber (see Chapter 10), a former detainee and member of the so-called Sonderkommando. Van Pelt presents them as having “the highest evidentiary value,” and makes Pressac’s analysis of these declarations his own. Van Pelt, however, has greatly inflated Tauber’s significance, making him the mainstay of his argumentation, the touchstone of all sources to the point where he even uses his own documents to bolster the “plausibility” of Tauber’s declarations. This is true as well for the other testimonies which cluster around Tauber’s statements for the sole purpose of “confirming” them.
It is easy to see why van Pelt does this. Tauber’s testimonies have constituted the seemingly unassailable basis of orthodox Holocaust historiography as far as cremations and homicidal gassings at Auschwitz are concerned – from 1945 to 1993, from Jan Sehn to Pressac. Pressac’s own “criminal traces” rely tacitly or explicitly on Tauber’s assertions and merely constitute, as it were, their (utterly baseless) documentary rendition.
Van Pelt’s strategy has another, more important motive: he had to deal with technical problems in the field of cremation and cremation furnaces with which he was entirely unfamiliar, and so he blindly followed Tauber’s statements. By accepting the absurdities uttered by this witness, however, and by making them the basis of his own reasoning, van Pelt has adopted a chain of reasoning which renders his entire argument specious.
The radical refutation of van Pelt’s argumentation therefore requires three specific approaches: one concerning the “criminal traces,” another concerning the cremations and cremation furnaces, and a third concerning Tauber’s testimony. They will constitute the first, second, and third part of the present work, respectively.
Compared to Pressac, van Pelt has introduced a new paradigm or rather a new designation for a paradigm, the “convergence of evidence” – a paradigm which Pressac had already utilized without giving it a specific name. It consists in the contemplation of allegedly independent documents and testimonies in an effort to show that everything “converges” to confirm the thesis of an extermination. Part Four examines the practical application of this paradigm by van Pelt and lays bare the serious technical and historical falsities that flow from it. Part Five finally analyzes in detail the origins of the alleged convergence of testimonies.
This book constitutes the first complete and radical dismantling of the intrinsically false argumentative structure and of the spearhead of orthodox Holocaust historiography about Auschwitz by demonstrating, on the one hand, that Pressac’s “criminal traces” have no value as evidence and, on the other, by documenting the fact that van Pelt’s “convergence of proof” is purely void of argumentative meaning.
As against this, the present work furnishes a coherent and actually converging set of evidentiary elements which show that the orthodox Holocaust thesis regarding the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz is historically, documentarily and technically unfounded.
Introduction
Jean-Claude Pressac may rightly be called the founder of orthodox Holocaust historiography on the subject of Auschwitz, which previously had functioned without documentation and without any method. He himself called the “traditional” treatment of the subject “a history based for the most part on testimonies, assembled according to the mood of the moment, truncated to fit an arbitrary truth and sprinkled with a few German documents of uneven value and without any connection with one another.” (1989, p. 264)
He applied a new historiographic method which, at least in its intentions, slighted testimony in favor of documentary material. Actually, though, he again relied on testimony to retrace the history of the alleged initial installations for homicidal gassings, which are said to have preceded those of the Birkenau Crematoria. His chapters on the gassings in Crematorium I (ibid., pp. 123-159) and in the so-called “bunkers” of Birkenau (ibid., pp. 161-182) are, in fact, exclusively based on testimony.
The new method was actually applied solely to the Birkenau Crematoria. Whereas Pressac should have been able to discover proof of the planning, construction and use of the alleged homicidal gas chambers in those installations, in the pertinent documentation preserved at the Auschwitz Museum, he found no proof of any kind. He was merely able to identify some “criminal traces” which somehow, by their number and their presumed convergence, had to fill the void.
Later on, in the early 1990s, when he was able to peruse the enormous trove of documents secured by the Soviets at Auschwitz and held in Moscow, Pressac wrote a new book in which he succeeded in adding nothing but a few more circumstantial indicators to his existing collection (Pressac 1993). But at precisely that point Pressac’s historiographic fortunes started to decline.
Van Pelt’s assault began the following year, when his name was inexplicably added to Pressac’s in a massively abridged English translation of the above book (Pressac/van Pelt 1994). It continued in 1996, when van Pelt appropriated Pressac’s “criminal traces” as his own in a book he wrote with Debórah Dwork (Dwork/van Pelt 1996), and culminated in 2000 at the Irving Lipstadt Trial. By 2002 the expropriation was complete. The Case for Auschwitz presents a full-fledged rehash of Pressac’s “criminal traces,” which now constitute the framework of orthodox Holocaust historiography concerning Auschwitz.
Whereas Pressac was an investigator, van Pelt is first and foremost a compiler with a much weaker critical bent and much less-gifted for historical and documental analyses. His reassessment of the “criminal traces” represents a simpler way of spreading Pressac’s theses and does not take into account their complexity and variations. Hence, replying directly to van Pelt’s purloined arguments makes no sense. Various revisionist scholars have examined Pressac’s theses (see in particular Verbeke; English as Rudolf 2016c), but until now there has been no systematic and comprehensive assessment of the value and the significance of the “criminal traces,” an analysis which would, at the same time, confer a new character to van Pelt’s comments.
The problem of the cremations at Auschwitz – one of the most important and still unresolved questions in the historiography of that camp – had started to come out of the general hysteria, into which it had been relegated for decades, and had started to take on some scientific connotations only in 1989, thanks to Jean-Claude Pressac. The merits of the French researcher end there, however: while he did indeed try to approach the problem from a scientific standpoint, his argumentative procedure and his conclusions show his crippling lack of technical training, which I shall discuss in Chapter 9. A rigorous scientific treatment of the matter became an urgent need.
Since the early 1990s I have been working on such an opus, assisted by engineer Dr. Franco Deana. The English translation titled The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz: A Technical and Historical Study finally appeared in 2015.355 In the context of the present study, this exhaustive study is presented in its main lines. This issue is important because, since the turn of the millennium, the problem of the Auschwitz cremations has relapsed into the propagandistic hysteria of the immediate post-war years.
As I have explained above, the question of the cremation furnaces of Auschwitz-Birkenau is one of the three pillars which support the entire argumentative structure of van Pelt’s book. One could even go so far as to say that it is the most important pillar, because the reliability of the witness testimonies is closely linked to the reliability of their statements in respect of the cremation furnaces. If the latter breaks down, the “convergence of proof” between witnesses and documents necessarily follows, and thus van Pelt’s entire argumentative structure collapses.
The problem is hence of prime importance. I will therefore offer the reader in the present part of this book first and foremost a synthesis of the conclusions of the work in question and of an article I wrote on the Auschwitz furnaces (1994b, updated in Rudolf 2000 and 2003) with its major historiographic implications, adjusted here with minor modifications to the final results of my study of cremation. The first version of said article has been criticized by a certain John C. Zimmerman in a text entitled Body Disposal at Auschwitz: The End of Holocaust Denial, which appeared on a website in 1999 and was partly incorporated into his book a year later. My reply to Zimmerman’s historically wrong and technically nonsensical arguments has been ignored by him so far (Mattogno 2017c).
Henryk Tauber was one of the most important witnesses during the famous Polish trial of Rudolf Höss at Warsaw, March 11 through 19, 1947. However, for unknown reasons he did not participate directly in the debates and did not even testify during the trial of the camp garrison, which later took place at Cracow from November 25 to December 16, 1947. His testimony, as attached to the proceedings of the Höss Trial, consisted of the minutes of a deposition which Tauber had made before the Investigating Judge Sehn on May 24, 1945 (Tauber 1945b). This testimony became the essential basis of the judicial reconstruction of the alleged method of extermination which the tribunal established; it was taken over as such by the incipient Polish historiography for its historical representation of the events.
Tauber’s testimony remained unknown for decades in Western historiography, until Pressac rediscovered it in 1989 in the records of the Höss Trial. In his voluminous work on Auschwitz, the French historian presented, in fact, a full translation into English together with his own detailed comments (1989 hereafter, if not stated otherwise, pp. 481-505). This translation, which is somewhat questionable, came from his own adaptation of two French versions prepared for him by Dorota Ryszka on one hand and Adam Rutkowski on the other (p. 481). For that reason, I have used my own translation of the Polish text into Italian (translated into English for the purposes of this book).
Pressac held Tauber in high esteem, calling him “an exceptional witness,” “being 95% historically reliable” (pp. 380, 481) and stated (p. 502):
“The proof of the exceptional validity of his testimony is how well it corresponds with the historical material available now that was not available in May 1945.”
Pressac’s assessment left its imprint on all later elements of orthodox Holocaust historiography, which lost no time in spreading Tauber’s testimony. In 1995 Piper incorporated it in its original language into the five-volume history of the camp, later translated into German and English (Długoborski/Piper 1995, Vol. III, pp. 189-208).
Conclusion
Van Pelt propounds on the subject of historical revisionism with great arrogance and ignorance. He labels opposing works “an insult to the intellect” (p. 69) and maligns its alleged incapacity to present a historiographic alternative (p. 318):
“The negationists claim to be revisionist historians, but they have yet to produce a history that offers a credible, ‘revised’ explanation of the events in question.”
This is exactly what I have done in the present work as well as in the numerous studies mentioned herein. Many of them had appeared prior to “The Pelt Report,” some even in English. Still, while van Pelt discusses the theses of all other revisionists who have ever written a few pages on the subject of Auschwitz, he never discusses any of my various studies with even a single word either in “The Pelt Report” or in The Case for Auschwitz. His neglect is obviously intentional.
In October of 1999, as stated in Subchapter 8.1 above, John C. Zimmerman published a critique of the English-language internet version of my article “The Crematoria Ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau” (1994b). I replied to his unfounded accusations with the article “John C. Zimmerman and ‘Body Disposal at Auschwitz’: Preliminary Observations,” in which I documented Zimmerman’s historical, technical and documental incompetence as well as his glaring bad faith. After my reply he wrote another even sillier article “My Response to Carlo Mattogno.” I immediately wrote a long and detailed response – “Supplementary Response to John C. Zimmerman on his ‘Body disposal at Auschwitz’” – in which I dismantled one by one all of Zimmerman’s claims. This reply was posted on the web in the year 2000. John C. Zimmerman has kept quiet ever since. He did publish a book in the same year with a number of critical remarks leveled against me, but this was simply a rehash of the historical and technical hot air of his previous articles. In spite of this, in a later study I refuted his fanciful analyses of the Birkenau aerial photographs he showed (2016d, pp. 50-79). It is a fact that Zimmerman has been unable to oppose anything to my final reply, and his silence reflects an unconditional surrender on his part, an admission that his arguments were unfounded and unsustainable, and remain so.
We must remember that this Zimmerman was one of van Pelt’s advisors. In view of the fact that the problem of the cremations has a fundamental significance within van Pelt’s domain of an alleged “convergence of evidence,” as I already underlined, can one seriously believe that the two men did not discuss at length my above article?
Clearly, they must have come to the conclusion that it was safer not to deal with any questions which they could not handle and which would have threatened to topple van Pelt’s already shaky system of proof. And for the same reason they felt that it would be preferable not to deal at all with any of my studies.
In order not to mention me, van Pelt even refrained from citing my three detailed articles exposing Samuel Crowell’s thesis as mistaken, according to which Pressac’s “criminal traces” point to the design and construction of air raid shelters in the crematoria of Birkenau (1999, 2000b, 2001b). Crowell’s thesis was so important to van Pelt that he dedicated thirteen pages to its discussion in an attempt to refute it. A reference to my articles would have saved him a lot of ink; but no, he had to avoid Mattogno like the plague.
Ignoring scholarly works of central importance to an issue, though, is firstrate evidence for unscientific behavior, which exposes van Pelt’s work as scientifically worthless already for that reason.
The accusation launched by van Pelt against revisionists in general, hence also against me, can therefore easily be deflected: his study of Auschwitz has no scientific and historiographic value,
– because it ignores works of crucial importance;
– because it does not even mention essential opposing views and arguments;
– because it fails to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means;
– because it is highly inconsistent; – because it uses deceptive methods;
– because it presents conflicting sources without due source criticism;
– because it reveals a decidedly threadbare knowledge of the camp’s history;
– because it distorts all sources to serve the alleged “extermination” aspects of Auschwitz;
– and because even regarding the claimed “extermination” aspects it exhibits an incomplete and superficial grasp of the subject.
The Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-04-25--The European Folk Soul Awakens

The European Folk Soul Awakens

Note : This article was sourced from The Noble Protagonist ’ s 1,100 page E-book , “ The Battle to preserve Western Civilization ( European Folk Soul vs. Jewish Supremacy ) .
Free E-Book available at : https : //archive.org/details/ @ nobleprotagonist Warning : The fundamentals of National Socialism are in accord with the Laws of Nature .
The European Folk Soul exists in accord with the Laws of Nature .
Beware of pro-White individuals or groups that use “ folkish ” terms to promote their personal agendas but avoid the elephant in the room , which is Hitler and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ battle to save Europe and Western Civilization from International Jewry , under the banner of National Socialism .
Controlled Opposition exists primarily to divert Whites from understanding the fundamentals of National Socialism .
http : //www.renegadetribune.com/national-socialism-the-fundamentals-part-1/ “ The Myth of Blood ” is the awakening of the European Folk Soul .
The European race is the external side of a soul .
To awaken the racial soul of Europeans , and bring it to life , means to recognize its highest value and its potential high achievement .
In all fields of human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our century ; to create a new human type out of a new view of life .
Thus , a new paradigm !
This Myth of Blood is our Blood Memory !
Within our blood , there exists a DNA source-code that holds our genetic ancestral memories intact .
Within our blood , our tribal knowledge , history & spiritual folk traditions are remembered .
Within our blood , our ancestral spirit is alive !
We must protect this blood and the Myth contained within it , at all costs .
The acts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interracial marriage and dysgenics , destroy the Myth of the Blood , our Blood Memory , our DNA source-code .
This creates racial-chaos !
The protection & veneration for European blood does not imply contempt for other races , but on the contrary , racial respect .
Since human races , as the core of nations , are created by nature , the very respect for nature itself demands respect for such creations .
The recognition of “ race-reality ” , the existence of a race , racial inequality & biodiversity , means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preserve certain definite characteristics that are unique to their race .
This is recognized the law of nature , not a law made by man .
Races have basic traits & possibilities .
They are realities resulting from political fate , language and nature .
This means that nowhere in our historical life is a race identical with a people .
The act of becoming a people is a long , rather mysterious process in which inner attitude , outward pressure and spiritual desire gradually begin to form the picture of a unified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ highest ideal for its own society .
If this race , through conquest or migration loses its ( demographic ) majority rule , and is infiltrated by foreign blood ( race mixing ) & ideas , then that society & civilization will be changed or overthrown .
History repeats itself !
Racial-chaos has been a common recurrence throughout time .
It is a historical truth that those who form the majority of the population , in any territory , will ultimately end up determining the nature of that society .
This is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how technologically proficient , no matter how militarily capable , no matter how determined , no racial group in the minority can indefinitely resist the power of demographics .
Homogeneity is the key to survival !
Heroism is basic to the character of the European peoples , originating from its Pagan past .
Their ancient understandings led to their greatest achievements .
They recognized that nature was not to be mastered by magic , or by intellectual schemes , but only by the most conscientious study of nature .
Because the ancient Europeans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a high reverence for the spiritual aspects of the Sun , it enabled him to discover the rule of natural law upon the earth .
Perhaps , it was precisely this very profound feeling that enabled them to shape the patterns of science and to evolve symbolic ideas , like the Swastika Sun symbol , which alone afforded the European peoples tools to closely approach the eternal flux of nature , despite the intermittence ( intermission ) of a continually formative consciousness .
In heroic conduct , whether of warriors , philosophers or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people , see what is of essential nature , and we know that all heroism groups itself around a supreme value .
This has always been the idea of honor , both spiritually & mentally .
But the idea of honor is involved in a war of soul & spirit against the values represented by foreign races or the product of miscegenation , the offspring of racial chaos .
European people , true to the roots and the Myth of Blood , determined by the concept of honor , would assert that someone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the name of condescending love & mercy , but in the name of justice & duty .
This would have had as consequence not a subservient humility , but an inward honesty , not the breaking of personality , but its strengthening .
That is , the reawakening of the consciousness of honor .
To this context belongs pity , of which the Christian church represents , and that has appeared the form of “ humanitarianism “ , which is promoted by International Jewry .
The loss of honor , central to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the greatest desolation of the White race in the face of open borders & political correctness .
White Genocide is the result !
From the coercive Christian dogma of unrestricted love & equality ( “ human rights ” ) of all mankind , hypocritically pushed by the levers of Jewish Supremacy , White society has virtually developed as a protector of the inferior , the sick , crippled , criminal and the rotten .
This dogma has become a doctrine that decomposes all commandments of life , including the life forms of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come into conflict with nature and has brought on her vengeance .
A nation whose is represented at its core by honor & duty , would not preserve the corrupt & criminal , but eliminate them through deportation or repatriation .
A White social & state community , welded together by honor & duty , must out of justice separate those racially & spiritually unfit for our traditional European forms of life .
Honor must be the highest value of all actions , and the protection of the White race must be given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of one who is detached from “ humanitarianism ” , who strives to obtain god-like divinity through heroic acts of bravery , one who is free , beautiful , and has a noble soul , all the traditional highest church values appear to be of a second and third rank .
Love , humility , compassion , prayer , good works , mercy , repentance ; all these are good & useful but only under the condition that they strengthen the power of the soul , elevate it , make it become more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , then all these virtues become useless , even harmful ; as is the case with today ’ s pathological altruism of the European Union .
This spirit of heroism & adventure has sent European explorers all over the globe .
They were not mere innovators , but discoverers in the real sense .
They reshaped the chaos of what they found into an ordered world .
These brave explorers visited remote continents , cold polar-regions , tropical forests , bare steppes , the remote seas , inaccessible rivers , lakes and high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explorers found freedom of soul by serving the interests of the European Folk Soul eternal quest for achievement .
Forward progress !
The freedom of soul is a value in itself .
Church values merely signify something in relation to a moment outside them , be it god , soul , or the creature .
The nobility of the self-reliant soul is the highest of all values .
Man must serve the cause of the noble soul alone .
The idea of freedom is inconceivable without honor just as honor is without freedom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to their European Folk Soul , believe deeply in an eternal law of nature , which they are manifestly linked to .
They do not despise nature , or try to have mastery over it , but accepts nature as the symbol of something supernatural .
White people , who are true to their European Folk Soul , feel in their heart the value & dignity of “ personality ” .
They are filled with a conscious intuition of it , knowing that it must be felt as well as known .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ personality ” .
They are driven by a vital feeling , by the greatest activity of soul , to observe , investigate and fathom his fellow men and the surrounding environment .
Therefore , they collectively have understood history as the development of a people ’ s “ personality ” .
The motivating force of International Jewry is always material gain .
The motivating force for the White race is the expression of an inner essence , in a development of soul , without earthly purpose .
Thus , the actions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spiritual activity .
By following this , they really live here on earth to serve a higher purpose .
White people attribute a dignity to action which alone can lead them to knowledge of themselves .
Goethe ( German writer ) accepts suffering ; even sees it as necessary & elevating ; “ Whoever can not despair ; should not live.
” Note : Goethe had a special connection with Nature , something which allowed him to discover many secrets of his society .
He recognized the problem of fiat money , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would soon bring ; he was an anti-Semite and some kind of pagan who worshiped Nature .
Meister Eckhart ( German philosopher ) frequently found soul expanding bliss in one single moment .
In the experience of a creative deed ; the whole of suffering is made worthwhile and thus overcome .
Nations originate , not by physical breeding , but by undergoing common historical events .
Through their suffering & struggles they are subjected to the rule of providence .
Therefore , true nations are of divine appointment .
They are created @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calling of their gods & goddesses .
This is their mission !
In doing so , their nation may dip into the well , which gives eternal youth .
To always serve this assigned mission means to acquire higher purposes , and with them a higher life .
On Mount Zion , a restless & strong dream was cultivated for centuries , the dream of gold , of power , of lies and hatred .
This dream drove the International Jewry around the entire world .
This Jewish dream is the bearer of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even today among us .
This dream of complete world domination is almost a reality , after many aborted attempts .
Many Whites today have ceased to search for their own dream , and because of this , they have lost their dream .
Whites , as a whole , are now experiencing the dream of International Jewry .
The battle of the European Folk Soul to preserve Western Civilization must put the dream of these Jews to eternal rest .
The present-day battle to preserve Western Civilization is essentially a battle for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Myth of Blood .
This awakening is the organic counter-movement against the racial-chaos promoted by Jewish Supremacy .
The European Folk Soul awakens !
The many Pagan faiths of native Europe has far more in common the nature-based spirituality of American Indians than the “ universalist ” religion of Christianity .
The Pagan faiths are for the European folk .
They reflect the “ Myth of Blood ” of indigenous European peoples .
After the fall of Western Rome , in order for Christianity gain foothold & acceptance in Europe , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of native Pagan peoples and the cutting down their sacred holy sites , including holy trees , took place in accordance with the foreign Abrahamic law of the Bible .
Despite these many atrocities , the European Christian Church eventually adopted many Pagan beliefs , spiritual symbols and traditions into their faith , which made their “ religion ” somewhat palatable to the native European .
The Protestant reformation , beginning in 1517 , brought further mass genocide , on a mass scale , to native Europeans .
The nature-based , Pagan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people .
It is a deep identification , a way of relating to the Holy , an expression of the European Folk Soul .
From this faith , we know that we are not born out of sin , we have free will , and life is good .
We are free to shape our lives to the extent allowed by our skill , courage and might .
We do not need salvation ; all we need is the freedom to face our lives with courage & honor .
We are connected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are a part of us !
We are also linked to all our living kin , the greater European family .
We are connected to Nature and subject to its laws .
Morality arises from the dignity & honor of the noble-minded man & woman .
We do not fear the Holy Powers ; rather we share a community & fellowship with the Divine .
The Holy Powers , our connection to the forces ( gods & goddesses ) behind Creation , encourage us to grow & advance to higher levels .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Divine , and ourselves in everyday life .
The native pagan faith is all about roots , connections and coming home to the European motherland in person or in spirit .
The European Folk Soul awakens !
French philosopher , Alain de Benoist , has rightly noticed , in “ The Way to be Pagans ” , that Europe could not and will not return to Paganism , but rather that Paganism was inevitably returning to Europe .
Paganism , aka Native European Spirituality , which is not a religion but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ returning to Europe long before the 20th Century , long before Nietzsche & Wagner .
Benoist noticed that its return can be traced as far back as the days of the Renaissance and can be found in those magnificent paintings rich in infatuation and love with the Aryan mythos of Hellas , and thereby with the Ancient Pagan soul of Europe .
Perhaps most modern historians have not taken notice of that evolution of Heathen creativity , but Christian priests have long ago manifested their concern , or , maybe , fear .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Monsignor Dupanloup , in 1852 , “ The Renaissance was the resurrection , the cult , the fanatical adoration of Paganism with all its literary , artistic , philosophical , moral and religious idols.
” Today , the ancient gods & goddesses of Europe are enjoying a heroic , long awaited return .
They belong to Europe and only Europe .
They have witnessed our rise to conquest , then our decay , and now they are watching us as we struggle to recover our eternal values , our Blood Memory , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Folk Soul awakens !
Note : The “ Quickening ” describes the observed phenomenon of accelerating changes in consciousness , technological advancement , spirituality and perhaps even physical causality .
The Aryan Awakening , the awakening of the European Folk Soul , the return of Paganism are signs of the “ Quickening ” , which is signaling the end of a cyclical age and the “ Eternal Return ” .

Note: This article was sourced from The Noble Protagonist’s 1,100 page E-book, “The Battle to preserve Western Civilization (European Folk Soul vs. Jewish Supremacy). Free E-Book available at: https://archive.org/details/@nobleprotagonist
Warning: The fundamentals of National Socialism are in accord with the Laws of Nature. The European Folk Soul exists in accord with the Laws of Nature. Beware of pro-White individuals or groups that use “folkish” terms to promote their personal agendas but avoid the elephant in the room, which is Hitler and the Third Reich who fought an epic battle to save Europe and Western Civilization from International Jewry, under the banner of National Socialism. Controlled Opposition exists primarily to divert Whites from understanding the fundamentals of National Socialism. http://www.renegadetribune.com/national-socialism-the-fundamentals-part-1/
THE MYTH OF BLOOD
Never forget that the holiest right in this world is the right to land which one wishes to cultivate oneself, and the holiest sacrifice is the blood which one pours forth for this land!” -Hitler History and the task of the future no longer signify the struggle of class against class, or the conflict between one church dogma and another, but the settlement between blood & blood, race & race, Folk & Folk.” -Alfred Rosenberg
“The Myth of Blood” is the awakening of the European Folk Soul. The European race is the external side of a soul. To awaken the racial soul of Europeans, and bring it to life, means to recognize its highest value and its potential high achievement. In all fields of human activity! That is the task of our century; to create a new human type out of a new view of life. Thus, a new paradigm!
This Myth of Blood is our Blood Memory! Within our blood, there exists a DNA source-code that holds our genetic ancestral memories intact. Within our blood, our tribal knowledge, history & spiritual folk traditions are remembered. Within our blood, our ancestral spirit is alive! We must protect this blood and the Myth contained within it, at all costs.
The acts of race mixing (miscegenation), interracial marriage and dysgenics, destroy the Myth of the Blood, our Blood Memory, our DNA source-code. This creates racial-chaos!
The protection & veneration for European blood does not imply contempt for other races, but on the contrary, racial respect. Since human races, as the core of nations, are created by nature, the very respect for nature itself demands respect for such creations.
These forces of race, soul and nature are the eternal prerequisites of existence and life, from which culture, belief, art, and so on, result as spiritual being.” -Alfred Rosenberg
The recognition of “race-reality”, the existence of a race, racial inequality & biodiversity, means that individuals from each race inherit & preserve certain definite characteristics that are unique to their race. This is recognized the law of nature, not a law made by man.
Races have basic traits & possibilities. They are realities resulting from political fate, language and nature. This means that nowhere in our historical life is a race identical with a people. The act of becoming a people is a long, rather mysterious process in which inner attitude, outward pressure and spiritual desire gradually begin to form the picture of a unified culture.
Every race cultivates its own highest ideal for its own society. If this race, through conquest or migration loses its (demographic) majority rule, and is infiltrated by foreign blood (race mixing) & ideas, then that society & civilization will be changed or overthrown. History repeats itself! Racial-chaos has been a common recurrence throughout time.
It is a historical truth that those who form the majority of the population, in any territory, will ultimately end up determining the nature of that society. This is an iron law of demographics! No matter how technologically proficient, no matter how militarily capable, no matter how determined, no racial group in the minority can indefinitely resist the power of demographics. Homogeneity is the key to survival!
History is a function of Race!” -Arthur Kemp
Heroism is basic to the character of the European peoples, originating from its Pagan past. Their ancient understandings led to their greatest achievements. They recognized that nature was not to be mastered by magic, or by intellectual schemes, but only by the most conscientious study of nature.
I have alluded from the beginning to the knightly concept of honor. It confronts us in all legal documents of Germanic men through all times as the eternal Myth of the Nordic race soul. The capacity to sacrifice his life for the idea of honor is regarded by the Icelandic Sagas as the essence of the Nordic man. This spiritual property was protected despite the sacrifice of all other possessions.” -Alfred Rosenberg
Because the ancient Europeans peoples engaged in Sun worship, held a high reverence for the spiritual aspects of the Sun, it enabled him to discover the rule of natural law upon the earth. Perhaps, it was precisely this very profound feeling that enabled them to shape the patterns of science and to evolve symbolic ideas, like the Swastika Sun symbol, which alone afforded the European peoples tools to closely approach the eternal flux of nature, despite the intermittence (intermission) of a continually formative consciousness.
The Myth of Blood; under the sign of the Swastika!” -Alfred Rosenberg
In heroic conduct, whether of warriors, philosophers or scientists, we, as ancient Indo-European people, see what is of essential nature, and we know that all heroism groups itself around a supreme value. This has always been the idea of honor, both spiritually & mentally. But the idea of honor is involved in a war of soul & spirit against the values represented by foreign races or the product of miscegenation, the offspring of racial chaos.
Without honor, one has no right to life. A nation that has pawned its honor has pawned its bread. Honor is the foundation of any people’s community. Losing our honor is the true cause of the loss of our freedom.” -Goebbels
European people, true to the roots and the Myth of Blood, determined by the concept of honor, would assert that someone in need should be supported, not in the name of condescending love & mercy, but in the name of justice & duty. This would have had as consequence not a subservient humility, but an inward honesty, not the breaking of personality, but its strengthening. That is, the reawakening of the consciousness of honor.
To this context belongs pity, of which the Christian church represents, and that has appeared the form of “humanitarianism“, which is promoted by International Jewry. The loss of honor, central to the Myth of Blood, led to the greatest desolation of the White race in the face of open borders & political correctness. White Genocide is the result!
From the coercive Christian dogma of unrestricted love & equality (“human rights”) of all mankind, hypocritically pushed by the levers of Jewish Supremacy, White society has virtually developed as a protector of the inferior, the sick, crippled, criminal and the rotten.
Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.” -Emma Lazarus (Jew) [Fundraising sonnet for the Statue of Liberty]
This dogma has become a doctrine that decomposes all commandments of life, including the life forms of people and the state. The result has come into conflict with nature and has brought on her vengeance.
A nation whose is represented at its core by honor & duty, would not preserve the corrupt & criminal, but eliminate them through deportation or repatriation.
A White social & state community, welded together by honor & duty, must out of justice separate those racially & spiritually unfit for our traditional European forms of life. Honor must be the highest value of all actions, and the protection of the White race must be given prime importance.
Seen from the standpoint of one who is detached from “humanitarianism”, who strives to obtain god-like divinity through heroic acts of bravery, one who is free, beautiful, and has a noble soul, all the traditional highest church values appear to be of a second and third rank. Love, humility, compassion, prayer, good works, mercy, repentance; all these are good & useful but only under the condition that they strengthen the power of the soul, elevate it, make it become more like god. If they do not, then all these virtues become useless, even harmful; as is the case with today’s pathological altruism of the European Union.
Possessions pass away. Relatives die. You yourself will die as they. One thing I know that lives forever; the famous (heroic) deeds of the dead.” -The Havamal, book of Viking wisdom
This spirit of heroism & adventure has sent European explorers all over the globe. They were not mere innovators, but discoverers in the real sense. They reshaped the chaos of what they found into an ordered world. These brave explorers visited remote continents, cold polar-regions, tropical forests, bare steppes, the remote seas, inaccessible rivers, lakes and high mountains. In this manner, these explorers found freedom of soul by serving the interests of the European Folk Soul eternal quest for achievement. Forward progress!
The freedom of soul is a value in itself. Church values merely signify something in relation to a moment outside them, be it god, soul, or the creature. The nobility of the self-reliant soul is the highest of all values. Man must serve the cause of the noble soul alone. The idea of freedom is inconceivable without honor just as honor is without freedom.
White people, who are true to their European Folk Soul, believe deeply in an eternal law of nature, which they are manifestly linked to. They do not despise nature, or try to have mastery over it, but accepts nature as the symbol of something supernatural.
Good without honor cannot be regarded as a good; and a body without honor, one is rightly accustomed to hold for dead. According to Germanic concepts, only that man possessing law has unassailable honor. After 1918, the man who possessed most money had law even if he was a scoundrel.” -Alfred Rosenberg
White people, who are true to their European Folk Soul, feel in their heart the value & dignity of “personality”. They are filled with a conscious intuition of it, knowing that it must be felt as well as known. They instinctively feel the eternity & immortality of “personality”. They are driven by a vital feeling, by the greatest activity of soul, to observe, investigate and fathom his fellow men and the surrounding environment. Therefore, they collectively have understood history as the development of a people’s “personality”.
The motivating force of International Jewry is always material gain. The motivating force for the White race is the expression of an inner essence, in a development of soul, without earthly purpose. Thus, the actions of the White races are a form of spiritual activity. By following this, they really live here on earth to serve a higher purpose. White people attribute a dignity to action which alone can lead them to knowledge of themselves.
Goethe (German writer) accepts suffering; even sees it as necessary & elevating; “Whoever cannot despair; should not live.”
Note: Goethe had a special connection with Nature, something which allowed him to discover many secrets of his society. He recognized the problem of fiat money, and guessed the evils that the industrial revolution would soon bring; he was an anti-Semite and some kind of pagan who worshiped Nature.
Meister Eckhart (German philosopher) frequently found soul expanding bliss in one single moment. In the experience of a creative deed; the whole of suffering is made worthwhile and thus overcome.
The warrior is the first announcer of faith. The weak builds himself ladders to heaven with which he hopes to be able to escape the world of deed.” -Kurt Eggers, Waffen-SS
Nations originate, not by physical breeding, but by undergoing common historical events. Through their suffering & struggles they are subjected to the rule of providence. Therefore, true nations are of divine appointment. They are created to recognize, ever anew, the calling of their gods & goddesses. This is their mission! In doing so, their nation may dip into the well, which gives eternal youth. To always serve this assigned mission means to acquire higher purposes, and with them a higher life.
Only in the midst of battles was the German Myth awakened.” -Alfred Rosenberg
On Mount Zion, a restless & strong dream was cultivated for centuries, the dream of gold, of power, of lies and hatred. This dream drove the International Jewry around the entire world. This Jewish dream is the bearer of evil lives and weaver of visions, even today among us. This dream of complete world domination is almost a reality, after many aborted attempts.
Many Whites today have ceased to search for their own dream, and because of this, they have lost their dream. Whites, as a whole, are now experiencing the dream of International Jewry. The battle of the European Folk Soul to preserve Western Civilization must put the dream of these Jews to eternal rest.
The individual is nothing. The folk, the race, is everything.” -SS
The present-day battle to preserve Western Civilization is essentially a battle for Whites to reclaim their Blood Memory, the Myth of Blood. This awakening is the organic counter-movement against the racial-chaos promoted by Jewish Supremacy. The European Folk Soul awakens!
Blood carries within it the sum total of all that has gone before, all that is and all that can be. Blood is eternal; it is the timeless landscape through which the story of our kin is told.” -Anonymous commenter Blood is greater than gold, a dirt clod (soil) is greater than a stock portfolio, honor is greater than the highest dividend, the folk stands taller than the sum of its business-transactions.” -Alfred Rosenberg The highest to which a man can attain is a heroic course of life.” -Schopenhauer
THE NATIVE EUROPEAN SPIRITUALITY
The German people are not marked by original sin, but by original nobility.” -Alfred Rosenberg In their day, faith grew from the blood and it was knowledge. Today it must be learned, for it is an alien faith.” -Wulf Sorensen (Himmler) Can one understand why these men (the Goths) laughed when they heard those commandments, which demanded that they not commit acts they never would have dreamed of committing? Can one understand that they raised their swords in wrath when the monks told them that they were ‘born in sin’?… Cannot one understand the unspeakable contempt with which these noble men regarded those (monks) who promised them a reward in heaven for abstaining from doing things which, according to their own nature, were beneath the dignity even of animals?… To such men the commandments were brought; men infinitely superior in human dignity and morality than the monks who brought them. For countless generations they had lived far above the moral plateau on which the commandments from Sinai then operated. Thousands of years before the time of the “Christ” the monks claimed to represent, our ancestors had sown the seeds of culture & civilization throughout the world on their fruitful voyages and wanderings.” -Wulf Sorensen (Himmler)
The many Pagan faiths of native Europe has far more in common the nature-based spirituality of American Indians than the “universalist” religion of Christianity. The Pagan faiths are for the European folk. They reflect the “Myth of Blood” of indigenous European peoples.
After the fall of Western Rome, in order for Christianity gain foothold & acceptance in Europe, a mass genocide, on a mass scale, of native Pagan peoples and the cutting down their sacred holy sites, including holy trees, took place in accordance with the foreign Abrahamic law of the Bible. Despite these many atrocities, the European Christian Church eventually adopted many Pagan beliefs, spiritual symbols and traditions into their faith, which made their “religion” somewhat palatable to the native European.
The Protestant reformation, beginning in 1517, brought further mass genocide, on a mass scale, to native Europeans.
The nature-based, Pagan faiths of native Europe is the way of people. It is a deep identification, a way of relating to the Holy, an expression of the European Folk Soul. From this faith, we know that we are not born out of sin, we have free will, and life is good. We are free to shape our lives to the extent allowed by our skill, courage and might. We do not need salvation; all we need is the freedom to face our lives with courage & honor. We are connected to all of our ancestors. They are a part of us!
We are also linked to all our living kin, the greater European family. We are connected to Nature and subject to its laws. Morality arises from the dignity & honor of the noble-minded man & woman. We do not fear the Holy Powers; rather we share a community & fellowship with the Divine.
The Holy Powers, our connection to the forces (gods & goddesses) behind Creation, encourage us to grow & advance to higher levels. We honor them! We honor our ancestors, the Divine, and ourselves in everyday life. The native pagan faith is all about roots, connections and coming home to the European motherland in person or in spirit. The European Folk Soul awakens!
NATIVE EUROPEAN SPIRITUALITY RETURNS TO EUROPE
The wisdom of a thousand generations slumbers in you. Waken it and you have found the key which will open the doors of your truest aspirations. Only he who esteems himself is worthy of being a man. Only he is a man who bears the living past and future in himself, for only he is able to stand above the present hour. And only he who is master of the present is successful; he alone is fulfilled. As only in fulfillment is divinity. Thus sayeth the Voice of our Ancestors.” -Wulf Sorensen (Himmler)
French philosopher, Alain de Benoist, has rightly noticed, in “The Way to be Pagans”, that Europe could not and will not return to Paganism, but rather that Paganism was inevitably returning to Europe.
Paganism, aka Native European Spirituality, which is not a religion but a way of life, has been returning to Europe long before the 20th Century, long before Nietzsche & Wagner. Benoist noticed that its return can be traced as far back as the days of the Renaissance and can be found in those magnificent paintings rich in infatuation and love with the Aryan mythos of Hellas, and thereby with the Ancient Pagan soul of Europe.
Perhaps most modern historians have not taken notice of that evolution of Heathen creativity, but Christian priests have long ago manifested their concern, or, maybe, fear. Abbot J. Gamme wrote in his letter to Monsignor Dupanloup, in 1852, “The Renaissance was the resurrection, the cult, the fanatical adoration of Paganism with all its literary, artistic, philosophical, moral and religious idols.”
Today, the ancient gods & goddesses of Europe are enjoying a heroic, long awaited return. They belong to Europe and only Europe. They have witnessed our rise to conquest, then our decay, and now they are watching us as we struggle to recover our eternal values, our Blood Memory, the Myth of Blood. The European Folk Soul awakens!
Note: The “Quickening” describes the observed phenomenon of accelerating changes in consciousness, technological advancement, spirituality and perhaps even physical causality. The Aryan Awakening, the awakening of the European Folk Soul, the return of Paganism are signs of the “Quickening”, which is signaling the end of a cyclical age and the “Eternal Return”.
Battle for the West (Website): http://www.battleforthewest.com/
Battle for the West (BitChute): https://www.bitchute.com/channel/65cDI4QdHali/
Share now!
Author: DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse. DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse.