renegadetribune--2020-11-13--Berries: A Top Anti-Diabetes Food

Berries: A Top Anti-Diabetes Food

Berries aren ’ t called superfoods for nothing .
A review covering 336 scientific articles on these fruits has shown that berry consumption can go a long way in preventing and managing Type 2 diabetes and its complications From the hunter-gatherers of ancient times to modern humans , berries hold incredible health benefits that only get further proven and respected over time .
Coming in different varieties and forms like raw , frozen and dried , these compact and versatile fruits can be easily incorporated into your diet year round .
Berries are chock-full of antioxidants , which are substances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inflammation , aging and the development of diseases such as heart disease and cancer .
[ i ] They are deemed “ promising functional fruits ” for their distinct therapeutic contents of anthocyanins , flavonoids , flavanols , alkaloids , organic acids and more — polyphenols that may be beneficial for oxidative stress , obesity , high blood pressure and diabetes .
[ ii ] In studies , polyphenols along with other berry components such as fiber and micronutrients have been linked with better cardiovascular health .
[ iii ] Each type of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” from cranberry ’ s efficacy in treating and preventing urinary tract infections to strawberry ’ s outstanding vitamin C content to black currant ’ s support for brain power and efficacy against rheumatoid arthritis .
An August 2020 review discussed how consuming berries can prevent diabetes and its complications .
[ iv ] Analyzing the differences in glucose and insulin levels after food intake in diabetic subjects , the reviewed studies found that consuming berries can be a reliable method to prevent and manage hyperglycemic and hyperlipidemic states .
The researchers examined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2 diabetes by searching various scientific databases using keywords such as “ berry consumption and diabetes , ” “ berries and high-glycemic diets ” and individual berry names .
This yielded 336 articles deemed relevant for the review .
Various berries have been probed for their potential diabetes benefits , including blueberries , bilberries , cranberries , raspberries , mulberries , lingonberries , blackberries , strawberries , goji berries , acai berries , chokeberries , black currants and maqui berries .
The review showed berries ’ various mechanisms of action against diabetes , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ glucose uptake and metabolism as well as inhibited weight gain and pro-inflammatory responses • Berry intake led to improvements in insulin sensitivity and lowering glucose The primary potential health-promoting bioactive compounds in berries include the following : What will it take to obtain the healthful effects ?
According to the reviewed papers , the daily recommended dose of whole berry varies from 200 to 400 grams ( 0.875 to 1.69 cups ) of berries for a 70-kilogram ( 154 pound ) middle-aged person .
It ’ s fairly established in studies that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after a meal if berries are consumed as well .
A Finnish study among healthy women found that adding berries to white and rye bread significantly reduced the post-meal insulin spike .
Strawberries , bilberries , lingonberries and chokeberries were considered effective .
[ v ] Berries work their wonder not just on diabetes but also on a wealth of other health issues : • Hair loss — Antioxidant-rich and anti-inflammatory foods may help reverse hair loss suffered by both men and women .
Some of those with the highest antioxidant potential include @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currants , blackberries , cranberries , crowberries , goji berries , strawberries and red sour berries .
[ vi ] • Anti-aging and improved brain health — An analysis of data on berry intake showed that mental decline slowed for women over age 70 who regularly consumed strawberries or blueberries .
[ vii ] Subjects who had greater intakes of the berries had slower mental decline , with the estimated effects translating to a delay in cognitive aging by about 1.5 to 2.5 years .
• Cardiovascular wellness — A study published in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & Dietetics involving postmenopausal women concluded that eating 22 g of blueberry powder every day for eight weeks reduced blood pressure and arterial stiffness .
[ viii ] This was likely due to increased nitric oxide production .
• Oral cancer and colorectal cancer — Animal studies have suggested that black raspberries may inhibit the growth of oral cancers .
[ ix ] In a study on patients with biopsy-confirmed oral squamous cell carcinomas , researchers confirmed that the fruit may be effective for oral cancer chemoprevention , reducing adverse gene expression of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ help colorectal cancer patients including by altering amino acid metabolism , energy and lipid metabolism .
[ x ] • Breast cancer — Previous studies have associated a high intake of fruit during adolescence with a lower risk of breast cancer .
[ xi ] In separate research , anticancer activity and lack of toxicity against normal cells indicate a chemopreventive potential of Goji berries in breast cancer treatment .
[ xii ] Find almost 1,000 abstracts about berries in the GreenMedInfo.com database to guide you in studying the nearly endless benefits of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ ii ] Hameed A et al “ Select Polyphenol-Rich Berry Consumption to Defer or Deter Diabetes and Diabetes-Related Complication ” Nutrients .
2020 Aug 21 ; 12 ( 9 ) .
Epub 2020 Aug 21 .
[ iv ] Hameed A et al “ Select Polyphenol-Rich Berry Consumption to Defer or Deter Diabetes and Diabetes-Related Complication ” Nutrients .
2020 Aug 21 ; 12 ( 9 ) .
Epub 2020 Aug 21 .
[ v ] Törrönen R et al “ Berries reduce postprandial insulin responses to wheat and rye breads in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Apr ; 143 ( 4 ) :430-6 .
Epub 2013 Jan 30 .
[ vi ] Carlsen , M. et al “ The total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods , beverages , spices , herbs and supplements used worldwide ” Nutr J .
9 ( 3 ) , doi : 10.1186/1475-2891-9-3 [ vii ] Elizabeth E Devore et al “ Dietary intakes of berries and flavonoids in relation to cognitive decline ” Ann Neurol .
2012 Jul ; 72 ( 1 ) :135-43 .
Epub 2012 Apr 26 .
[ viii @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Blueberry Consumption Improves Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Postmenopausal Women with Pre- and Stage 1-Hypertension : A Randomized , Double-Blind , Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial ” J Acad Nutr Diet .
2015 March ; 115 ( 3 ) :369-377 [ ix ] Knobloch T et al “ Suppression of pro-inflammatory and pro-survival biomarkers in oral cancer patients consuming a black raspberry phytochemical-rich troche ” Cancer Prev Res ( Phila ) .
2015 Dec 23 .
Epub 2015 Dec 23 .
[ x ] Pan Pan et al “ Beneficial Regulation of Metabolic Profiles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Patients ” Cancer Prev Res ( Phila ) .
2015 Aug ; 8 ( 8 ) :743-50 .
Epub 2015 Jun 8 .
[ xi ] Farvid M et al “ Fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescence and early adulthood and risk of breast cancer : population based cohort study ” BMJ .
2016 ; 353 : i2343 .
Epub 2016 May 11 .
[ xii ] Wawruszak A et al “ Anticancer effect of ethanol Lycium barbarum ( Goji berry ) extract on human breast cancer T47D cell line ” Nat Prod @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2015 Nov 2 .

Berries aren’t called superfoods for nothing. A review covering 336 scientific articles on these fruits has shown that berry consumption can go a long way in preventing and managing Type 2 diabetes and its complications
From the hunter-gatherers of ancient times to modern humans, berries hold incredible health benefits that only get further proven and respected over time. Coming in different varieties and forms like raw, frozen and dried, these compact and versatile fruits can be easily incorporated into your diet year round.
Berries are chock-full of antioxidants, which are substances that help prevent the oxidation associated with inflammation, aging and the development of diseases such as heart disease and cancer.[i]
They are deemed “promising functional fruits” for their distinct therapeutic contents of anthocyanins, flavonoids, flavanols, alkaloids, organic acids and more — polyphenols that may be beneficial for oxidative stress, obesity, high blood pressure and diabetes.[ii]
In studies, polyphenols along with other berry components such as fiber and micronutrients have been linked with better cardiovascular health.[iii] Each type of berry has its specific “superpower,” from cranberry’s efficacy in treating and preventing urinary tract infections to strawberry’s outstanding vitamin C content to black currant’s support for brain power and efficacy against rheumatoid arthritis.
Polyphenol-Rich Berries Deter Diabetes and Its Complications
An August 2020 review discussed how consuming berries can prevent diabetes and its complications.[iv] Analyzing the differences in glucose and insulin levels after food intake in diabetic subjects, the reviewed studies found that consuming berries can be a reliable method to prevent and manage hyperglycemic and hyperlipidemic states.
The researchers examined berry consumption and the management of Type 2 diabetes by searching various scientific databases using keywords such as “berry consumption and diabetes,” “berries and high-glycemic diets” and individual berry names. This yielded 336 articles deemed relevant for the review.
Various berries have been probed for their potential diabetes benefits, including blueberries, bilberries, cranberries, raspberries, mulberries, lingonberries, blackberries, strawberries, goji berries, acai berries, chokeberries, black currants and maqui berries. The review showed berries’ various mechanisms of action against diabetes, including the following:
Anthocyanins promoted glucose uptake and metabolism as well as inhibited weight gain and pro-inflammatory responses
Berry intake led to improvements in insulin sensitivity and lowering glucose
Berry consumption favorably altered gut microflora, thus assisting in diabetes management
The primary potential health-promoting bioactive compounds in berries include the following:
Glycosides Glucosides Catechins Epicatechins Quercetin Myricetin Flavanolds Flavonols Caffeic acids Phenolic acids Polysaccharides
What will it take to obtain the healthful effects? According to the reviewed papers, the daily recommended dose of whole berry varies from 200 to 400 grams (0.875 to 1.69 cups) of berries for a 70-kilogram (154 pound) middle-aged person.
It’s fairly established in studies that the body needs less insulin for sugar balance after a meal if berries are consumed as well. A Finnish study among healthy women found that adding berries to white and rye bread significantly reduced the post-meal insulin spike. Strawberries, bilberries, lingonberries and chokeberries were considered effective.[v]
Other Berry Benefits Worth Noting
Berries work their wonder not just on diabetes but also on a wealth of other health issues:
Hair loss — Antioxidant-rich and anti-inflammatory foods may help reverse hair loss suffered by both men and women. Some of those with the highest antioxidant potential include Indian gooseberry, bilberries, fresh black currants, blackberries, cranberries, crowberries, goji berries, strawberries and red sour berries. [vi]
Antioxidant-rich and anti-inflammatory foods may help suffered by both men and women. Some of those with the highest antioxidant potential include Indian gooseberry, bilberries, fresh black currants, blackberries, cranberries, crowberries, goji berries, strawberries and red sour berries. Anti-aging and improved brain health — An analysis of data on berry intake showed that mental decline slowed for women over age 70 who regularly consumed strawberries or blueberries. [vii] Subjects who had greater intakes of the berries had slower mental decline, with the estimated effects translating to a delay in cognitive aging by about 1.5 to 2.5 years.
— An analysis of data on berry intake showed that mental decline slowed for women over age 70 who regularly consumed strawberries or blueberries. Subjects who had greater intakes of the berries had slower mental decline, with the estimated effects translating to a delay in cognitive aging by about 1.5 to 2.5 years. Cardiovascular wellness — A study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics involving postmenopausal women concluded that eating 22 g of blueberry powder every day for eight weeks reduced blood pressure and arterial stiffness. [viii] This was likely due to increased nitric oxide production.
— A study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics involving postmenopausal women concluded that eating 22 g of blueberry powder every day for eight weeks reduced blood pressure and arterial stiffness. This was likely due to increased nitric oxide production. Oral cancer and colorectal cancer — Animal studies have suggested that black raspberries may inhibit the growth of oral cancers. [ix] In a study on patients with biopsy-confirmed oral squamous cell carcinomas , researchers confirmed that the fruit may be effective for oral cancer chemoprevention, reducing adverse gene expression of the condition. Black raspberry may also help colorectal cancer patients including by altering amino acid metabolism, energy and lipid metabolism. [x]
— Animal studies have suggested that black raspberries may inhibit the growth of oral cancers. In a study on patients with biopsy-confirmed , researchers confirmed that the fruit may be effective for oral cancer chemoprevention, reducing adverse gene expression of the condition. Black raspberry may also help patients including by altering amino acid metabolism, energy and lipid metabolism. Breast cancer — Previous studies have associated a high intake of fruit during adolescence with a lower risk of breast cancer.[xi] In separate research, anticancer activity and lack of toxicity against normal cells indicate a chemopreventive potential of Goji berries in breast cancer treatment.[xii]
Find almost 1,000 abstracts about berries in the GreenMedInfo.com database to guide you in studying the nearly endless benefits of berries across various areas of well-being.
References
[i] Gropper S et al. Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism. 4th Ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth; 2005.
[ii] Hameed A et al “Select Polyphenol-Rich Berry Consumption to Defer or Deter Diabetes and Diabetes-Related Complication” Nutrients. 2020 Aug 21 ;12(9). Epub 2020 Aug 21.
[iii] Basu A et al “Berries: emerging impact on cardiovascular health” Nutr Rev. 2010 Mar; 68(3): 168–177.
[iv] Hameed A et al “Select Polyphenol-Rich Berry Consumption to Defer or Deter Diabetes and Diabetes-Related Complication” Nutrients. 2020 Aug 21 ;12(9). Epub 2020 Aug 21.
[v] Törrönen R et al “Berries reduce postprandial insulin responses to wheat and rye breads in healthy women” J Nutr. 2013 Apr ;143(4):430-6. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
[vi] Carlsen, M. et al “The total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods, beverages, spices, herbs and supplements used worldwide” Nutr J. 9(3), doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-3
[vii] Elizabeth E Devore et al “Dietary intakes of berries and flavonoids in relation to cognitive decline” Ann Neurol. 2012 Jul ;72(1):135-43. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
[viii] Johnson SA et al “Daily Blueberry Consumption Improves Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Postmenopausal Women with Pre- and Stage 1-Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial” J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 March;115(3):369-377
[ix] Knobloch T et al “Suppression of pro-inflammatory and pro-survival biomarkers in oral cancer patients consuming a black raspberry phytochemical-rich troche” Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015 Dec 23. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
[x] Pan Pan et al “Beneficial Regulation of Metabolic Profiles by Black Raspberries in Human Colorectal Cancer Patients” Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015 Aug ;8(8):743-50. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
[xi] Farvid M et al “Fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescence and early adulthood and risk of breast cancer: population based cohort study” BMJ. 2016 ;353:i2343. Epub 2016 May 11.
[xii] Wawruszak A et al “Anticancer effect of ethanol Lycium barbarum (Goji berry) extract on human breast cancer T47D cell line” Nat Prod Res. 2015 Nov 2:1-4. Epub 2015 Nov 2.


renegadetribune--2020-11-14--Ticketmaster Plans To Require Negative COVID Test Or Proof Of Vaccine When Events Resume

We ’ ve all been confused and unsure of what ‘ the new normal ’ will look like .
Heck , why are we even talking about a new normal in the context of more centralized power and control ?
What about a new normal in a world where humanity can truly thrive ?
Is this not worthy of a conversation ?
Nonetheless , the mainstream plan for ‘ new normal ’ is becoming clear , and it ’ s precisely what we ’ ve been projecting would happen .
What Happened : Ticketmaster is looking at requiring event-goers to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or proof of COVID-19 vaccine if they wish to attend concerts and other events when they resume again .
“ We ’ re already seeing many third-party health care providers prepare to handle the vetting — whether that is getting a vaccine , taking a test , or other methods of review and approval – which could then be linked via a digital ticket so everyone entering the event is verified , ” Ticketmaster president Mark Yovich told Billboard .
If events begin again in 2021 , to attend an event , one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proof they ’ ve been vaccinated .
Or they can provide proof that they ’ ve had a negative coronavirus test within 24 to 72 hours prior to the start of the event .
Ticketmaster would not retain nor have access to personal health records .
The system and infrastructure to pull this off are still in the works , but the goal is no on-site testing .
According to the Billboard article : Once the test was complete , the fan would instruct the lab to deliver the results to their health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If the tests were negative , or the fan was vaccinated , the health pass company would verify the attendee ’ s COVID-19 status to Ticketmaster , which would then issue the fan the credentials needed to access the event .

By
We’ve all been confused and unsure of what ‘the new normal’ will look like. Heck, why are we even talking about a new normal in the context of more centralized power and control? What about a new normal in a world where humanity can truly thrive? Is this not worthy of a conversation? Nonetheless, the mainstream plan for ‘new normal’ is becoming clear, and it’s precisely what we’ve been projecting would happen.
What Happened: Ticketmaster is looking at requiring event-goers to have proof of a negative coronavirus test or proof of COVID-19 vaccine if they wish to attend concerts and other events when they resume again.
“We’re already seeing many third-party health care providers prepare to handle the vetting — whether that is getting a vaccine, taking a test, or other methods of review and approval – which could then be linked via a digital ticket so everyone entering the event is verified,” Ticketmaster president Mark Yovich told Billboard.
Exclusive: How Ticketmaster plans to check your vaccine status for concerts https://t.co/A0wEC1uxbO — billboard (@billboard) November 11, 2020
If events begin again in 2021, to attend an event, one would purchase a ticket and then provide proof they’ve been vaccinated. Or they can provide proof that they’ve had a negative coronavirus test within 24 to 72 hours prior to the start of the event. Ticketmaster would not retain nor have access to personal health records. The system and infrastructure to pull this off are still in the works, but the goal is no on-site testing.
According to the Billboard article:
Once the test was complete, the fan would instruct the lab to deliver the results to their health pass company, like CLEAR or IBM. If the tests were negative, or the fan was vaccinated, the health pass company would verify the attendee’s COVID-19 status to Ticketmaster, which would then issue the fan the credentials needed to access the event.
… read the rest
This article originally appeared on Collective Evolution.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-14--Grandparents Get to Hug Their Grandchildren With Retarded “Hugging Station”

This is so retarded , but also sinister .
The jews and their lackeys have been able to convince people @ @ @ @ @ protect grandparents is to hug them through a plastic sheet .

This is so retarded, but also sinister. The jews and their lackeys have been able to convince people that the only way to protect grandparents is to hug them through a plastic sheet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgDA2H7d0Gw
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-14--jewish Sexologist Dr John Money Normalizes and Justifies Bestiality for ‘Goyim’

Jew Dr John Shekel is most infamous for his botched circumcision on a young boy .
He manipulated his victim @ @ @ @ @ mother into believing he was actually a woman ; the young boy committed suicide .
@ @ @ @ @ praised by the jewish media as a massive figure in the jewish orchestrated transgender movement @ @ @ @ @ see Dr John money discuss how fucking animals is perfectly normal , just a taboo @ @ @ @ @ The jewish talmud tells the jewish race that only jewish people are considered humans , @ @ @ @ @ “ goyim ” ( cattle ) are not human .
This is his last tel-avivision @ @ @ @ @ .

From Parthian Tactics
Jew Dr John Shekel is most infamous for his botched circumcision on a young boy. He manipulated his victim and the boy’s mother into believing he was actually a woman; the young boy committed suicide. jew Dr John shekels is praised by the jewish media as a massive figure in the jewish orchestrated transgender movement.
In this clip we see Dr John money discuss how fucking animals is perfectly normal, just a taboo form of street sex. The jewish talmud tells the jewish race that only jewish people are considered humans, to Dr Shekels, we “goyim” (cattle) are not human. This is his last tel-avivision appearance before his timely death.
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-14--Less Than Half Of Americans Likely To Comply With New COVID Lockdown: Gallup Poll

Earlier we featured the worrisome prospect of a second national coronavirus lockdown under a future Biden administration , considering the latest scientist to join Joe Biden ’ s “ special coronavirus transition advisory team ” is calling for just that .
Dr. Michael Osterholm , who serves as director of the Center of Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota , now one of Biden ’ s coronavirus task force doctors , told Yahoo News the following on Wednesday : “ We could pay for a package right now to cover all of the lost wages for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then we could lockdown for 4 to 6 weeks.
” But we know that ’ s unlikely to go well based on the latest polling data , as it appears the majority of Americans would not conform to such new stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions : Americans are less likely to comply with another coronavirus lockdown than they were in the spring , with fewer than half saying in a new poll that they ’ re very likely to stay home this time around , according to a new Gallup Poll released as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Here ’ s the data , according to Gallup , based on the poll taken between Oct.19 and Nov.1 : • 49 % say they ’ re “ very likely ” to stay home for a month if mandated , down from 67 % who said they would in the spring .
• 18 % said they were “ somewhat likely ” to comply .
• One-third said they would be “ unlikely ” to comply with new lockdown orders .
• This despite 61 % saying they believe the situation is getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who said they ’ d be unlikely to comply is double the rate seen from polls in the spring .
However , it appears more Americans are intentional about social distancing measures , including wearing masks , compared to in the spring .
As Newsmax summarizes of the numbers : “ Meanwhile , the number of people who are wearing masks has gone up sharply.
” The report states “ Only about half of Americans reported in April that they were wearing masks , just after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % reported they wear masks , after the number went up to 92 % in July .
”

By Tyler Durden
Earlier we featured the worrisome prospect of a second national coronavirus lockdown under a future Biden administration, considering the latest scientist to join Joe Biden’s “special coronavirus transition advisory team” is calling for just that.
Dr. Michael Osterholm, who serves as director of the Center of Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, now one of Biden’s coronavirus task force doctors, told Yahoo News the following on Wednesday: “We could pay for a package right now to cover all of the lost wages for individual workers… if we did that, then we could lockdown for 4 to 6 weeks.”
But we know that’s unlikely to go well based on the latest polling data, as it appears the majority of Americans would not conform to such new stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions:
Americans are less likely to comply with another coronavirus lockdown than they were in the spring, with fewer than half saying in a new poll that they’re very likely to stay home this time around, according to a new Gallup Poll released as record numbers of cases skyrocket nationwide.
Here’s the data, according to Gallup, based on the poll taken between Oct.19 and Nov.1:
49% say they’re “very likely” to stay home for a month if mandated, down from 67% who said they would in the spring .
for a month if mandated, . 18% said they were “somewhat likely” to comply.
One-third said they would be “unlikely” to comply with new lockdown orders.
This despite 61% saying they believe the situation is getting worse.
The number of respondents who said they’d be unlikely to comply is double the rate seen from polls in the spring.
However, it appears more Americans are intentional about social distancing measures, including wearing masks, compared to in the spring.
One of Biden's new coronavirus task force doctors floating the idea of a 4-6 week lockdown: “We could pay for a package right now to cover all of the lost wages for individual workers … if we did that, then we could lockdown for 4 to 6 weeks."pic.twitter.com/zNmuQvPpIJ — Zack Guzmán (@zGuz) November 11, 2020
As Newsmax summarizes of the numbers: “Meanwhile, the number of people who are wearing masks has gone up sharply.”
The report states “Only about half of Americans reported in April that they were wearing masks, just after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggested wearing them. Now, 88% reported they wear masks, after the number went up to 92% in July.”
Source: Zero Hedge
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-14--It Is Maddening to See White People Complaining About “Nazi” Lockdowns

Now do not get me wrong , I love seeing White people ( and all people ) getting fed up with the draconian lockdowns , but I just can not stand how the kosher controllers are being compared to the “ Nazis.
” Nothing we are seeing is even remotely close to anything the National Socialists did .
It is only through a lifetime of consuming jewish media that anyone could even believe that the tyranny of today could be associated with the swastika .
I see it everywhere .
We are told that the latest machinations of the jew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or more specifically , the brownshirts , the gestapo , or the SS concentration camp guards .
Sure , some of the people spouting this crap are paid disinformation agents ( I could name quite a few ) , but many are just White people who have grown up drinking poison and now it has severely affected their brains .
They might be awake to a certain extent , but as long as they still believe the jewish lies about WWII and think that Trump is really trying to save us , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ By kvetching about “ Nazis , ” White people are siding with their tormentors against the people who launched the last large-scale effort to free the world of the international jewish terrorists .
After the “ Nazis ” were defeated , White people were flooded with immigrants , taught to hate themselves , brainwashed to worship jews , and softened up for the institution of worldwide Communism .
What we need to do is counter their comparisons with more accurate ones .
This is why at the start of this insanity I proposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could also reference gulags instead of concentration camps and Communist ( also jewish Bolshevik or Soviet ) instead of “ Nazi.
” Do not be afraid to correct someone who is spouting jewish lies for who is to blame .
Hopefully this would help the reality of the situation sink in for the average indoctrinated White person .
jewish lockdowns can only be stopped by recognizing the culprits .

Now do not get me wrong, I love seeing White people (and all people) getting fed up with the draconian lockdowns, but I just cannot stand how the kosher controllers are being compared to the “Nazis.” Nothing we are seeing is even remotely close to anything the National Socialists did. It is only through a lifetime of consuming jewish media that anyone could even believe that the tyranny of today could be associated with the swastika.
I see it everywhere. We are told that the latest machinations of the jew world order are just like the Nazis, or more specifically, the brownshirts, the gestapo, or the SS concentration camp guards. Sure, some of the people spouting this crap are paid disinformation agents (I could name quite a few), but many are just White people who have grown up drinking poison and now it has severely affected their brains. They might be awake to a certain extent, but as long as they still believe the jewish lies about WWII and think that Trump is really trying to save us, they are not on our side.
By kvetching about “Nazis,” White people are siding with their tormentors against the people who launched the last large-scale effort to free the world of the international jewish terrorists. After the “Nazis” were defeated, White people were flooded with immigrants, taught to hate themselves, brainwashed to worship jews, and softened up for the institution of worldwide Communism.
What we need to do is counter their comparisons with more accurate ones. This is why at the start of this insanity I proposed calling the COVID police Neo-Stazis.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/neo-stasi-terrorists-must-be-stopped/
We could also reference gulags instead of concentration camps and Communist (also jewish Bolshevik or Soviet) instead of “Nazi.” Do not be afraid to correct someone who is spouting jewish lies for who is to blame. Hopefully this would help the reality of the situation sink in for the average indoctrinated White person.
jewish lockdowns can only be stopped by recognizing the culprits.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-11-16--Nobody Denied It Happened?

Nobody Denied It Happened?

Hello everyone .
Last year Professor Deborah Lipstadt gave a lecture about Holocaust denial at the University of Oxford .
There she stated : There are many , many people in fact who are under the same impression ; they are quite certain that during the trials all the Nazis fell to their knees exclaiming “ We did it !
” .
But is this true ?
In order to find out we will have a look at several Nazi testimonies from the International Military Tribunal ( IMT ) and Nuremberg Military Tribunal ( NMT ) transcripts regarding the alleged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you will never find in history books .
Now we turn to the Chief of the Reich Chancellery Hans Lammers ( v. 11 , pp .
50-53 ) : LAMMERS : Yes , I know a great deal about that .
The final solution of the Jewish question became known to me for the first time in 1942 .
That is when I heard that the Führer supposedly , through Göring , had given an order to the SS Obergruppenführer Heydrich to achieve a solution of the Jewish question .
I did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and consequently , since this did not come within my jurisdiction , at the beginning I took a negative attitude , but then as I wanted to know something I , of course , had to contact Himmler .
I asked him what was really meant by the idea of the final solution of the Jewish question .
Himmler replied that he had received the order from the Führer to bring about the final solution of the Jewish problem – or rather Heydrich and his successor had that order – and that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Jews were to be evacuated from Germany .
With that statement I was satisfied for the time and waited for further developments , since I assumed that I would now in some way – I really had no jurisdiction here – I would obtain some information from Heydrich or his successor , Kaltenbrunner .
Since nothing did come I wanted to inform myself about this , and back in 1942 I announced a report to the Führer , whereupon the Führer told me that it was true that he had given Himmler @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not want any further discussion about this Jewish question during the war .
[ … ] In the meantime I once more turned to Herr Himmler .
He was of the opinion that it was necessary to discuss this question since a number of problems would have to be solved , particularly since the intention of achieving a final solution of the Jewish question would probably extend to persons of mixed blood , first grade , and would also extend to the so-called “ privileged ” marriages , that is to say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Aryan whereas the other party was Jewish .
The Führer stated once more that he did not wish to have a report on it but that he had no objections to consultation on these problems .
That some evacuations had taken place in the meantime had become known to me .
At that time , at any rate , not the slightest thing was known , about the killing of Jews ; if crass individual cases came up , I always addressed myself to Himmler and he was always very willing to settle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in 1943 , rumors cropped up that Jews were being killed .
I had no jurisdiction in this field ; it was merely that I occasionally received complaints and on the basis of these complaints I investigated the rumors .
But , as far as I could tell , at any rate , these rumors always proved to be only rumors .
Every one said he had heard it from somebody else and nobody wanted to make a definite statement .
I am , in fact , of the opinion that these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and that the people just did not want to say from where they had the information .
That caused me once more to undertake an investigation of this matter .
First of all , since I , for my part , could not initiate investigations of matters under Himmler ’ s jurisdiction , I addressed myself to Himmler once again .
Himmler denied any legal killings and told me , with reference to the order from the Führer , that it was his duty to evacuate the Jews and that during such evacuations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people , of course there were cases of death , there were accidents , there were attacks by enemy aircraft .
He added too , that there were revolts , which of course he had to suppress severely and with bloodshed , as a warning .
For the rest , he said that these people were being accommodated in camps in the East .
He brought out a lot of pictures and albums and showed me the work that was being done in these camps by the Jews and how they worked for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , tailors shops , and so forth .
He told me : Lammers also testified at the Ministries Case ( NMT , v. 13 ) .
Asked again about the Final Solution he affirmed ( pp .
419-421 ) : A .
Only in the year 1943 did such rumors come to my knowledge and this happened through private conversations and through a few anonymous and pseudonymous letters .
But for me these rumors remained rumors .
I looked into them .
However , I never succeeded in ascertaining anything positive regarding the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bringing me such rumors never wished to stand their ground and withdrew when I tried to pin them down to their statements .
It always turned out that they would name their informants or did not wish to and that they themselves were not eyewitnesses .
I myself always had the impression that such rumors rested solely on the listening to foreign radios which was strictly forbidden and punishable and in the last analysis no one wished to confess this activity .
So far as I looked into letters that were actually signed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pseudonymous letters , and so far as I wished to pin any individual down to an actual deposition of facts , that never came about because the persons did not wish to stick to their stories and could produce no actual recounting of facts , and were themselves not eyewitnesses .
[ … ] Minister of Finance Schwerin von Krosigk and Secretary of the Foreign Office Ernst von Weizsäcker were also examined during that trial .
On the Final Solution , von Krosigk stated ( p. 406 ) : We return to Nuremberg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IMT , v. 12 , p. 374 ) : Next , Chief of the Wehrmacht Alfred Jodl ( v. 15 , p. 332 ) : So here is the question : Is Dr. Deborah Lipstadt aware of all this ?
If yes , then she is deliberately misleading the public .
If not , she is just an ignoramus who should probably stick to giving lectures on making birthday cakes .

Hello everyone. Last year Professor Deborah Lipstadt gave a lecture about Holocaust denial at the University of Oxford. There she stated:
“In not one war-crimes trial since the end of World War Two has a perpetrator of any nationality ever said it didn’t happen.” (1:55)
There are many, many people in fact who are under the same impression; they are quite certain that during the trials all the Nazis fell to their knees exclaiming “We did it!”. But is this true?
In order to find out we will have a look at several Nazi testimonies from the International Military Tribunal (IMT) and Nuremberg Military Tribunal (NMT) transcripts regarding the alleged attempt to exterminate the Jews – testimonies you will never find in history books.
We begin with Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel (IMT, v. 10, p. 594, 598):
“DR. LATERNSER: Do you know whether the higher military commanders at any time were informed of the intention of Hitler or Himmler to kill the Jews?
KEITEL: According to my opinion, that was not the case, since I personally was not informed either. […]
DR. HORN: In connection with the testimony by General Lahousen, I want to ask you one question. At the time of the Polish campaign, was there a directive or an order by Hitler to exterminate the Jews in the Polish Ukraine?
KEITEL: I cannot recall any such things. I know only that during the occupation of Poland – that is after the occupation – the problem of the Polish Jews played a part. In that connection I also put a question once to Hitler to which, I believe, he answered that that area was well suited for settling the Jews there. I do not know or remember anything else.”
We continue with Reichskommissar Arthur Seyss-Inquart (v. 16, p. 19):
“DR. HAENSEL: You said in your interrogation that a decree of Heydrich’s caused you to have Jews transported from Holland. Did you see Hitler’s decree to Heydrich?
SEYSS-INQUART: I think so – a decree from Hitler to Heydrich alone would not have been for Heydrich.
DR. HAENSEL: You picture the situation as if Heydrich had told you that he had this decree.
SEYSS-INQUART: Yes, he told me that, and a few weeks later he sent me this decree.
DR. HAENSEL: Was it in writing?
SEYSS-INQUART: Yes, it was in writing.
DR. HAENSEL: And what did the decree say?
SEYSS-INQUART: That he had complete charge of the final solution of the Jewish question as well as other matters dealing therewith.
DR. HAENSEL: And when was this? 1941? 1940?
SEYSS-INQUART: It was at about the time when the evacuations started. That was in 1942.
DR. HAENSEL: That must be wrong. It was 1941, not later.
SEYSS-INQUART: Perhaps he showed me the decree later. I do not know the date of the decree.
DR. HAENSEL: That must be the case. But this decree, you said, was conceived in general terms?
SEYSS-INQUART: General terms.
DR. HAENSEL: It could be interpreted one way or another? I mean, you know…
SEYSS-INQUART: Yes, I had the impression that in the occupied territories Heydrich was to carry through the evacuation, and at that time I was not quite sure whether that was to be a final evacuation – which, however, was possible. The most extreme possibility was that the Jews would be collected in camps and after the end of the war settled somewhere.
DR. HAENSEL: I beg your pardon, Witness, the most extreme possibility would certainly be that the Jews would be destroyed, is that not so?
SEYSS-INQUART: I am speaking of the most extreme possibility which I thought of at the time.”
He also added (p. 20):
“DR. HAENSEL: Before 1943 did you discuss these problems with Hitler?
SEYSS-INQUART: I was merely present when Hitler talked about these problems. It was always along this line, to eliminate the Jews from the German population and to send them somewhere abroad.
DR. HAENSEL: But there was no talk at all about destruction of the Jews?
SEYSS-INQUART: Never.”
Now we turn to the Chief of the Reich Chancellery Hans Lammers (v. 11, pp. 50-53):
“DR. THOMA: I have only one more question. Did you know anything regarding the fact that Hitler had decided to solve the Jewish question by the final solution, that is, by the annihilation of the Jews?
LAMMERS: Yes, I know a great deal about that. The final solution of the Jewish question became known to me for the first time in 1942. That is when I heard that the Führer supposedly, through Göring, had given an order to the SS Obergruppenführer Heydrich to achieve a solution of the Jewish question. I did not know the exact contents of that order and consequently, since this did not come within my jurisdiction, at the beginning I took a negative attitude, but then as I wanted to know something I, of course, had to contact Himmler. I asked him what was really meant by the idea of the final solution of the Jewish question. Himmler replied that he had received the order from the Führer to bring about the final solution of the Jewish problem – or rather Heydrich and his successor had that order – and that the main point of the order was that the Jews were to be evacuated from Germany. With that statement I was satisfied for the time and waited for further developments, since I assumed that I would now in some way – I really had no jurisdiction here – I would obtain some information from Heydrich or his successor, Kaltenbrunner. Since nothing did come I wanted to inform myself about this, and back in 1942 I announced a report to the Führer, whereupon the Führer told me that it was true that he had given Himmler the order for evacuation but that he did not want any further discussion about this Jewish question during the war. […]
In the meantime I once more turned to Herr Himmler. He was of the opinion that it was necessary to discuss this question since a number of problems would have to be solved, particularly since the intention of achieving a final solution of the Jewish question would probably extend to persons of mixed blood, first grade, and would also extend to the so-called “privileged” marriages, that is to say, marriages where only one party was Aryan whereas the other party was Jewish. The Führer stated once more that he did not wish to have a report on it but that he had no objections to consultation on these problems. That some evacuations had taken place in the meantime had become known to me. At that time, at any rate, not the slightest thing was known, about the killing of Jews; if crass individual cases came up, I always addressed myself to Himmler and he was always very willing to settle these individual cases. Finally, however, in 1943, rumors cropped up that Jews were being killed. I had no jurisdiction in this field; it was merely that I occasionally received complaints and on the basis of these complaints I investigated the rumors. But, as far as I could tell, at any rate, these rumors always proved to be only rumors. Every one said he had heard it from somebody else and nobody wanted to make a definite statement. I am, in fact, of the opinion that these rumors were based mostly on foreign broadcasts and that the people just did not want to say from where they had the information. That caused me once more to undertake an investigation of this matter. First of all, since I, for my part, could not initiate investigations of matters under Himmler’s jurisdiction, I addressed myself to Himmler once again. Himmler denied any legal killings and told me, with reference to the order from the Führer, that it was his duty to evacuate the Jews and that during such evacuations, which also involved old and sick people, of course there were cases of death, there were accidents, there were attacks by enemy aircraft. He added too, that there were revolts, which of course he had to suppress severely and with bloodshed, as a warning. For the rest, he said that these people were being accommodated in camps in the East. He brought out a lot of pictures and albums and showed me the work that was being done in these camps by the Jews and how they worked for the war needs, the shoemakers shops, tailors shops, and so forth. He told me:
“This is the order of the Führer; if you believe that you have to take action against it then tell the Führer and tell me the names of the people who have made these reports to you.”
Of course, I could not tell him the names, first of all because they did not want to be named, and secondly, they only knew these things from hearsay, so as I said, I could not have given him any definite material at all. Nevertheless, I once again reported this matter to the Führer, and on this occasion he gave me exactly the same reply which I had been given by Himmler. He said, “I shall later on decide where these Jews will be taken and in the meantime they are being cared for there.” […]
DR. THOMA: But, Witness, please be quite brief. I am now putting this question to you: Did Himmler ever tell you that the final solution of the Jewish problem would take place through the extermination of the Jews?
LAMMERS: That was never mentioned. He talked only about evacuation.
DR. THOMA: He talked only about evacuation?
LAMMERS: Yes, only about evacuation.
DR. THOMA: When did you hear that these 5 million Jews had been exterminated?
LAMMERS: I heard of that here a while ago.”
And later (p. 115):
“MAJOR JONES: Are you, as the head of the Reich Chancellery, the man who knew all the secrets of the Third Reich, saying to this Tribunal that you had no knowledge of the murder of millions and millions who were murdered under the Nazi regime?
LAMMERS: I mean to say that I knew nothing about it until the moment of the collapse, that is, the end of April 1945 or the beginning of May, when I heard such reports from foreign broadcasting stations. I did not believe them at the time, and only later on I found further material here, in the newspapers. If we are speaking now of the elimination of a harmful influence that is far from meaning annihilation. The Führer did not say a word about murder; no mention was ever made of such a plan.”
Lammers also testified at the Ministries Case (NMT, v. 13). Asked again about the Final Solution he affirmed (pp. 419-421):
“Q. Witness, I must return to the killings of Jews. You stated that you had no knowledge of that. But I must nevertheless ask you, didn’t you at least hear rumors of such killings of Jews, and what did you undertake on hearing them?
A. Only in the year 1943 did such rumors come to my knowledge and this happened through private conversations and through a few anonymous and pseudonymous letters. But for me these rumors remained rumors. I looked into them. However, I never succeeded in ascertaining anything positive regarding the truth of such alleged facts. People bringing me such rumors never wished to stand their ground and withdrew when I tried to pin them down to their statements. It always turned out that they would name their informants or did not wish to and that they themselves were not eyewitnesses. I myself always had the impression that such rumors rested solely on the listening to foreign radios which was strictly forbidden and punishable and in the last analysis no one wished to confess this activity. So far as I looked into letters that were actually signed, I found out that these were pseudonymous letters, and so far as I wished to pin any individual down to an actual deposition of facts, that never came about because the persons did not wish to stick to their stories and could produce no actual recounting of facts, and were themselves not eyewitnesses. […]
Q. In what then did the problem of the final solution consist so far as you understood that term at that time and I emphasize your understanding of the term at that time?
A. The solution was to lie in the evacuation of full-blooded Jews, and secondly, a regulation of some sort concerning the privileged Jews and the half-Jews.
Q. Witness, on the basis of the minutes of the three meetings of 20 January 1942, 6 March 1942, and 27 October 1942 put in by the prosecution, are you stilI of the opinion that no program for exterminating the Jews was ever set up and that, secondly, with regard to including half-Jews and privileged Jews in the evacuation or other measures, no program was set up?
A. Yes. I am of that opinion. At least this program never came to my attention. The program cannot have been set up.”
Minister of Finance Schwerin von Krosigk and Secretary of the Foreign Office Ernst von Weizsäcker were also examined during that trial. On the Final Solution, von Krosigk stated (p. 406):
“Q. With reference to the problem of the treatment of the Jews I have one more question. These matters have been repeatedly discussed here. I would only like to hear your personal attitude. What did you know about the so-called Final Solution [Endloesung] of the Jewish Question?
A. I cannot remember ever having heard the term at all before the collapse. At any rate I was not aware of any physical extermination as a solution of the Jewish question.
Q. The prosecution naturally says that many people in Germany knew it and asks why you, as a minister, did not know it. Is it possible for you to explain that?
A. Of course it could not remain hidden from me that in wartime Jews were evacuated from Germany. All the less since the property they left behind them was transferred to my financial authority for administration and evaluation. But as far as a plan, the execution of such a plan went, that this evacuation was to lead to extermination, that is something of which I never heard anything at all. When I asked I was always told that these measures were equivalent to the internment of enemy nationals in wartime for security reasons.
Q. At that time were you ever given the name of a place where they were taken?
A. The East was mentioned quite generally. I only heard one name. That was Theresienstadt. That was given to me as a place which had been evacuated by other inhabitants and made available for the settlement of German Jews.”
And von Weizsäcker (p. 437):
“Q. Were you kept currently informed about what was happening to the Jews and what extent the extermination [Vernichtung] had assumed?
A. From the very beginning I considered many atrocious actions possible, but my imagination did not suffice to picture what I actually learned after the collapse.
Q. Didn’t you know of the plan of the so-called Final Solution [Endloesung], I mean the plan regarding the final extermination of all the Jews who were reported to the East?
A. This plan was completely unknown to me.”
We return to Nuremberg with the testimony of Julius Streicher (IMT, v. 12, p. 374):
“LT. COL. GRIFFITH-JONES: We will go on. Now, I just want to put one or two further articles of your own to you. You remember what I am suggesting, that you are inciting the German people to murder. We know now that at least you had read one article in the Israelitisches Wochenblatt where murder is mentioned. I just want to see what you go on to publish in your own paper after that date. Would you look at Page 47-A. This is an article by yourself on 6 January 1944. This is after you had been living on your estate for some time.
“After the National Socialist uprising in Germany, a development began in Europe, too, from which one can expect that it will free this continent for all time of the Jewish disintegrator and exploiter of nations; and, over and above this, that the German example will, after a victorious termination of the second World War, bring about the destruction of the Jewish world tormentor on the other continents as well.”
What example was the German nation setting to the other nations of the world? What example do you mean there?
STREICHER: This article corroborates what I have been saying all along. I spoke of an international solution of the Jewish question. I was convinced that if Germany had won this war or had been victorious over Bolshevism, then the world would have agreed that an understanding should be reached with the other nations for an international solution of the Jewish question. If I wrote here about destruction, it is not to be understood as destruction by mass killing; as I have said, that is an expression; I have to point out that I do not believe that Erich Kauffmann[1] really wanted to kill the German people by sterilization, but he wrote it, and we sometimes wrote in the same manner, echoing the sounds that we heard in the other camp.
LT. COL. GRIFFITH-JONES: You have not yet told us what is this international solution that you are advocating by talking about extermination; if it is not murder, what is it? What is the solution?
STREICHER: I have already said that I founded the Anti-Semitic Union, and through this Anti-Semitic Union we wanted to create movements among the nations which should, above and beyond governments, act in such a way that an international possibility would be created, such as has been represented today here in this Trial – thus I conceived it, to form an international congress center which would solve the Jewish question by the creation of a Jewish state and thereby destroy the power of the Jews within the nations.
LT. COL. GRIFFITH-JONES: That is your answer – that you were advocating a Jewish state? Is that all that this comes to? Is it simply that you were advocating a Jewish national home? Is that what you have been talking about in all these extracts that we have read? Is that the solution which you are advocating?
STREICHER: Well, I do not know what you want with that question. Of course, that is the solution.
LT. COL. GRIFFITH-JONES: Very well. Let us just go on now. Turn to Page 48-A now, will you? This is 24 January 1944, “Whoever does what a Jew does is a scoundrel, a criminal, and he who repeats and wishes to copy him deserves the same fate – annihilation, death.”
Are you still advocating a national Jewish home?
STREICHER: Yes, that has nothing to do with the big political plan. If you take every statement by a writer, every statement from a daily newspaper, as an example, and want to prove a political aim by it, then you miss the point. You have to distinguish between a newspaper article and a great political aim.”
Next, Chief of the Wehrmacht Alfred Jodl (v. 15, p. 332):
“DR. EXNER: As we are just talking of the Jews, will you tell the Court what you knew about the extermination of Jews? I remind you that you are under oath.
JODL: I know just how improbable these explanations sound, but very often the improbable is true and the probable untrue. I can only say, fully conscious of my responsibility, that I never heard, either by hint or by written or spoken word, of an extermination of Jews. On one single occasion I had doubts, and that was when Himmler spoke about the revolt in the Jewish Ghetto. I did not quite believe in this heroic fight; but Himmler immediately supplied photographs showing the concrete dugouts which had been built there, and he said, “Not only the Jews but also Polish Nationalists have taken refuge there and they are offering bitter resistance”. And with that he removed my suspicions.
THE PRESIDENT: Are you speaking of Warsaw? What example was the German nation setting to the other nations of the world? What example do you mean there?
JODL: I am speaking of the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto of which I heard through a personal report from Himmler given in our presence, in the presence of soldiers at the Fuehrer’s headquarters. Himmler spoke only of an uprising and of bitter fighting. As far as the activities of the Police are concerned, of the so-called action groups, Einsatzgruppen and Einsatzkommandos – a conception, incidentally, of which I first heard here in detail – there was never any explanation through the Fuehrer himself other than that these police units were necessary to quell uprisings, rebellions, and partisan actions before they grew into a menace. This was not a task for the Armed Forces, but for the Police, and for that reason the Police had to enter the operational areas of the Army. I have never had any private information on the extermination of the Jews; and on my word, as sure as I am sitting here, I heard all these things for the first time after the end of the war.”
We continue with Alfred Rosenberg (v. 22, p. 382):
“The thought of a physical annihilation of Slavs and Jews, that is to say, the actual murder of entire peoples, has never entered my mind and I most certainly did not advocate it in any way. I was of the opinion that the existing Jewish question would have to be solved by the creation of a minority right, by emigration, or by settling the Jews in a national territory over a ten-year period of time. The White Paper of the British Government of 24 July 1946 shows how historical developments can bring about measures which were never previously planned.”
And finally, Reich Marshal Hermann Goering (v. 9, p. 619):
“SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: You heard what I read to you about Hitler, what he said to Horthy and what Ribbentrop said, that the Jews must be exterminated or taken to concentration camps. Hitler said the Jews must either work or be shot. That was in April 1943. Do you still say that neither Hitler nor you knew of this policy to exterminate the Jews?
GOERING: For the correctness of the document.
SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Will you please answer my question. Do you still say neither Hitler nor you knew of the policy to exterminate the Jews?
GOERING: As far as Hitler is concerned, I have said I do not think so. As far as I am concerned, I have said that I did not know, even approximately, to what extent these things were taking place.
SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: You did not know to what degree, but you knew there was a policy that aimed at the extermination of the Jews?
GOERING: No, a policy of emigration, not liquidation of the Jews. I knew only that there had been isolated cases of such perpetrations.”
So here is the question: Is Dr. Deborah Lipstadt aware of all this? If yes, then she is deliberately misleading the public. If not, she is just an ignoramus who should probably stick to giving lectures on making birthday cakes.


renegadetribune--2020-11-16--Holohoax Tales – Fonzie’s Dad Smuggled Jewellery Covered in Chocolate

Henry Winkler AKA Fonzie from the tv series Happy Days describes how his father escaped to a new life in @ @ @ @ @ in chocolate .
His father pawned the jewellery and started a business…when he went back @ @ @ @ @ he bought back the same jewellery .

Henry Winkler AKA Fonzie from the tv series Happy Days describes how his father escaped to a new life in America by smuggling jewellery covered in chocolate. His father pawned the jewellery and started a business…when he went back to the shop years later he bought back the same jewellery.
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-16--Israel Lobby’s Latest Way to Extort Money from US Taxpayers

New bill would give Israel a veto over US arms sales… Cumulative US aid to Israel is three times the amount the US spent to rebuild Europe after WWII under the Marshall Plan… an Israel lobby group proposes that the US explode its already ballooning deficit even further by advancing cash to Israel under a new “ Deferred Payment Plan ” … Israel is the leading state sponsor of nuclear proliferation… a 1994 paper speculated that Israel ’ s nuclear weapons might drive regional rivals to develop their own nukes to balance Israel ’ s nuclear arsenal… The Israeli study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s nuclear weapons was “ at odds with articulated US positions on nuclear nonproliferation… ” By Grant F. Smith , text reposted from Antiwar.com ( photos and videos added by IAK ) The United Arab Emirates bid to purchase F-35 multirole stealth aircraft caused a firestorm among Israel lobby operatives , pundits , and congressional fellow travelers .
They say the US has an obligation to maintain Israel ’ s “ Qualitative Military Edge ” ( QME ) if not Israel ’ s “ Qualitative AND Quantitative Military Edge.
” QME is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conceived to assess and counter the Warsaw Pact ’ s numerical troop advantage over US and allied forces stationed in Europe .
The US was thought to need a qualitative advantage in military systems in order to counter the imbalance .
Israel began insisting on QME for itself during the tumultuous debate surrounding the Reagan administration ’ s sale of advance airborne radar systems ( AWACs ) to Saudi Arabia .
Israel argued to protect its QME any such sale required additional and more advanced arms for Israel .
Today , as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ successfully coerced to establish ties with Israel [ see this ] , someday those countries could stop obeying US marching orders and respond to popular demands for change , like Egypt during the Arab Spring.That is a problem , according to pro-Israel thinkers .
Bill would give Israel veto over US arms sales Their latest solution for maintaining Israeli QME , therefore , involves giving Israel veto power over such US arms sales .
The legislative solution introduced by Representative Brad Schneider ( D-IL ) and supported by the American Israel Public Affairs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Guaranteeing Israel ’ s QME Act of 2020.
” The bill proposes amending the Arms Export Control Act by requiring the president to consult with the Israeli government before proceeding with any such sales .
The president would then have to submit a report card to Congress on the degree to which Israel ’ s “ Qualitative Military Edge ” might be impacted .
The AECA was already amended in 2008 and 2012 to require certifications that any sales would not “ adversely affect ” Israel ’ s military edge .
But it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Arms Export Control Act and presidential certifications as vehicles for inserting Israeli oversight into the US decision chain .
After Israel ’ s illegal 1960s diversion of US weapons-grade uranium from the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation ( NUMEC ) in Pennsylvania , Senators Symington and Glenn passed mid-1970s amendments to the Foreign Assistance Act .
They banned US economic and military assistance , export credits , and US support to countries that deliver or receive , acquire or transfer nuclear enrichment technology when such countries do not comply with International Atomic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then , Israel has continued to be the Middle East ’ s leading state sponsor of nuclear proliferation due to its incessant top-to-bottom illicit trafficking in nuclear weapons-related materials , know-how , and technology from the US .
Israel proliferated to regimes such as apartheid South Africa .
Symington & Glenn now reside in the Arms Export Control Act and require the president to notify Congress of any proposed US foreign aid to a known rogue nuclear state .
Clinton , Bush , Obama & Trump secretly said they would violate law Rather @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last four Presidents instead caved into Israeli and its US lobby ’ s pressure not to uphold that particular section of the AECA .
Presidents Clinton , Bush , Obama , and Trump instead executed secret letters promising not to do so as reported by Adam Entous in The New Yorker .
The National Archives refuses to release two of these letters .
After a successful lawsuit was filed in 2011 to release damning US government information about Israel ’ s nuclear weapons production facilities , President Barack Obama even passed a 2012 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ releases .
That has limited any informed debate about Israel , nonproliferation , and related policies such as QME .
Other legislation promoted by AIPAC , such as sections within S.2583 , now mandate that the US withhold IAEA funding if the leading state sponsor of Middle East nuclear proliferation is ever “ denied its right to participate in the Agency.
” $ 295 billion to Israel , and more to come… Publicly known cumulative US foreign assistance ( excluding intelligence support and other covert funding ) to Israel is on track to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That is three times the amount spent to rebuild Europe after WWII under the Marshall Plan .
Some $ 253 billion ( 86 % ) has been delivered since Symington and Glenn became law , while $ 116 billion has been delivered after presidents Clinton through Trump signed secret letters promising to subvert the AECA .
Analytical output from pro-Israel think tanks such as the Foundation for Defense of Democracies ( FDD ) [ info on FDD here ] outline even additional solutions beyond the Schneider bill – by showering more “ free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US taxpayer money for Israel to purchase Israeli weapons systems .
The US should also further explode its already ballooning deficit by advancing cash to Israel under a new “ Deferred Payment Plan ” for Israel to tap future “ allocations ” from the current $ 38 billion MOU and even “ future MOU ’ s , ” says FDD .
US loss of legitimacy because of Israel Things were not always this upside down .
A quarter-century ago serious analysis about the so-called “ QME ” centered on the core issue of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nuclear weapons .
The 1994 Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies paper “ Israel ’ s Deterrence Strategy Revisited ” performed an analysis of the impact Israel ’ s undeclared nuclear arsenal had on deterrence .
It even speculated that Israel ’ s nuclear weapons might drive regional rivals to develop their own nukes or seek long-range missiles with chemical weapons to “ balance ” Israel ’ s nuclear arsenal .
The study also admitted that US silence on Israel ’ s nuclear weapons was “ at odds with articulated US positions on nuclear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For a long time , the US has had little legitimacy in global nonproliferation circles largely because of Israel .
Lobby scam to fund billions more to Israel Today “ QME ” has become just another Israel lobby scam for extorting American taxpayers .
It requires Americans to fund billions in freebies to Israel for every US sale of advanced weapons systems to wealthy autocratic regimes in the Middle East .
It is preconditioned on undermining nuclear non-proliferation .
Americans would be much better served by the cancellation of all US arms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ giveaways , enforcing Symington and Glenn , and restarting long-dormant direct US diplomatic engagement with regional bogeymen such as Iran and Syria .
A serious conversation about the Middle East nuclear proliferation – and Israel ’ s central role – is similarly long overdue .
Grant F. Smith is the director of the Institute for Research : Middle Eastern Policy in Washington which is co-organizer of 2021 Transcending the Israel Lobby at Home and Abroad conference at the National Press Club and 2020 IsraelLobbyConEXTRA !
Schneider is a life long Israel advocate .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ himself on using his position in Congress to advocate for the Jewish State .

New bill would give Israel a veto over US arms sales… Cumulative US aid to Israel is three times the amount the US spent to rebuild Europe after WWII under the Marshall Plan… an Israel lobby group proposes that the US explode its already ballooning deficit even further by advancing cash to Israel under a new “Deferred Payment Plan”…
Israel is the leading state sponsor of nuclear proliferation… a 1994 paper speculated that Israel’s nuclear weapons might drive regional rivals to develop their own nukes to balance Israel’s nuclear arsenal… The Israeli study also admitted that US silence on Israel’s nuclear weapons was “at odds with articulated US positions on nuclear nonproliferation…”
By Grant F. Smith, text reposted from Antiwar.com (photos and videos added by IAK)
The United Arab Emirates bid to purchase F-35 multirole stealth aircraft caused a firestorm among Israel lobby operatives, pundits, and congressional fellow travelers. They say the US has an obligation to maintain Israel’s “Qualitative Military Edge” (QME) if not Israel’s “Qualitative AND Quantitative Military Edge.”
QME is a doctrine that US war planners originally conceived to assess and counter the Warsaw Pact’s numerical troop advantage over US and allied forces stationed in Europe. The US was thought to need a qualitative advantage in military systems in order to counter the imbalance.
Israel began insisting on QME for itself during the tumultuous debate surrounding the Reagan administration’s sale of advance airborne radar systems (AWACs) to Saudi Arabia. Israel argued to protect its QME any such sale required additional and more advanced arms for Israel.
Today, as the US offers additional advanced weapons to regimes successfully coerced to establish ties with Israel [see this], someday those countries could stop obeying US marching orders and respond to popular demands for change, like Egypt during the Arab Spring.That is a problem, according to pro-Israel thinkers.
Bill would give Israel veto over US arms sales
Their latest solution for maintaining Israeli QME, therefore, involves giving Israel veto power over such US arms sales. The legislative solution introduced by Representative Brad Schneider (D-IL) and supported by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is the “Guaranteeing Israel’s QME Act of 2020.”
The bill proposes amending the Arms Export Control Act by requiring the president to consult with the Israeli government before proceeding with any such sales. The president would then have to submit a report card to Congress on the degree to which Israel’s “Qualitative Military Edge” might be impacted.
The AECA was already amended in 2008 and 2012 to require certifications that any sales would not “adversely affect” Israel’s military edge. But it is ironic that the Schneider bill employs the Arms Export Control Act and presidential certifications as vehicles for inserting Israeli oversight into the US decision chain.
After Israel’s illegal 1960s diversion of US weapons-grade uranium from the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) in Pennsylvania, Senators Symington and Glenn passed mid-1970s amendments to the Foreign Assistance Act.
They banned US economic and military assistance, export credits, and US support to countries that deliver or receive, acquire or transfer nuclear enrichment technology when such countries do not comply with International Atomic Energy Agency regulations and inspections.
Israel leading state sponsor of nuclear proliferation
Since then, Israel has continued to be the Middle East’s leading state sponsor of nuclear proliferation due to its incessant top-to-bottom illicit trafficking in nuclear weapons-related materials, know-how, and technology from the US. Israel proliferated to regimes such as apartheid South Africa.
Symington & Glenn now reside in the Arms Export Control Act and require the president to notify Congress of any proposed US foreign aid to a known rogue nuclear state.
Clinton, Bush, Obama & Trump secretly said they would violate law
Rather than comply with the law, the last four Presidents instead caved into Israeli and its US lobby’s pressure not to uphold that particular section of the AECA.
Presidents Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump instead executed secret letters promising not to do so as reported by Adam Entous in The New Yorker. The National Archives refuses to release two of these letters.
After a successful lawsuit was filed in 2011 to release damning US government information about Israel’s nuclear weapons production facilities, President Barack Obama even passed a 2012 gag order called WNP-136 forbidding any further releases. That has limited any informed debate about Israel, nonproliferation, and related policies such as QME.
Other legislation promoted by AIPAC, such as sections within S.2583, now mandate that the US withhold IAEA funding if the leading state sponsor of Middle East nuclear proliferation is ever “denied its right to participate in the Agency.”
$295 billion to Israel, and more to come…
Publicly known cumulative US foreign assistance (excluding intelligence support and other covert funding) to Israel is on track to reach $295 billion in 2020. That is three times the amount spent to rebuild Europe after WWII under the Marshall Plan.
Some $253 billion (86%) has been delivered since Symington and Glenn became law, while $116 billion has been delivered after presidents Clinton through Trump signed secret letters promising to subvert the AECA.
Analytical output from pro-Israel think tanks such as the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) [info on FDD here] outline even additional solutions beyond the Schneider bill – by showering more “free” US weapons on Israel and more US taxpayer money for Israel to purchase Israeli weapons systems.
The US should also further explode its already ballooning deficit by advancing cash to Israel under a new “Deferred Payment Plan” for Israel to tap future “allocations” from the current $38 billion MOU and even “future MOU’s,” says FDD.
US loss of legitimacy because of Israel
Things were not always this upside down.
A quarter-century ago serious analysis about the so-called “QME” centered on the core issue of deterrence necessarily factored in Israel’s nuclear weapons. The 1994 Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies paper “Israel’s Deterrence Strategy Revisited” performed an analysis of the impact Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal had on deterrence.
It even speculated that Israel’s nuclear weapons might drive regional rivals to develop their own nukes or seek long-range missiles with chemical weapons to “balance” Israel’s nuclear arsenal.
The study also admitted that US silence on Israel’s nuclear weapons was “at odds with articulated US positions on nuclear nonproliferation.” This last point is poignant. For a long time, the US has had little legitimacy in global nonproliferation circles largely because of Israel.
Lobby scam to fund billions more to Israel
Today “QME” has become just another Israel lobby scam for extorting American taxpayers.
It requires Americans to fund billions in freebies to Israel for every US sale of advanced weapons systems to wealthy autocratic regimes in the Middle East. It is preconditioned on undermining nuclear non-proliferation.
Americans would be much better served by the cancellation of all US arms sales to the region including the Israel giveaways, enforcing Symington and Glenn, and restarting long-dormant direct US diplomatic engagement with regional bogeymen such as Iran and Syria. A serious conversation about the Middle East nuclear proliferation – and Israel’s central role – is similarly long overdue.
Grant F. Smith is the director of the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy in Washington which is co-organizer of 2021 Transcending the Israel Lobby at Home and Abroad conference at the National Press Club and 2020 IsraelLobbyConEXTRA!
Addendum on Brad Schneider
Schneider is a life long Israel advocate. He has lived in Israel and prides himself on using his position in Congress to advocate for the Jewish State.


renegadetribune--2020-11-16--Encoding the Fibonacci Sequence Into Music

This muscician made a piano piece from the Fibonacci Sequence by assigning numbers to the E major scale .
It @ @ @ @ @ nice .

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-16--Dr. Fauci Warns US Likely To Cancel Christmas, Hints That Masks & Social Distancing Are Here To Stay

Across the US , millions of Americans are planning on scaled-back Thanksgiving dinners , with only members of their immediate family “ bubbles ” invited .
Mayors of some of America ’ s large cities , along with the governors of California , Oregon and Washington State , have asked residents to limit travel over the holidays .
As angst about the spoiled Thanksgiving holiday simmers , Dr. Anthony Fauci acknowledged Sunday during an appearance on CNN ’ s “ State of the Union ” that American families should probably prepare to skip Christmas dinner , too .
While Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and assured the American public that the FDA ’ s first vaccine emergency-use authorization could be handed down within days , he cautioned during Sunday ’ s interview that people should continue to wear masks and observe social distancing even after they ’ ve been vaccinated .
It ’ s just the latest unsettling hint that social distancing requirements could be here to stay .
I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you ’ ve been vaccinated , ” Fauci said during an appearance on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Because even though for the general population it might be 90 % to 95 % effective , you don ’ t necessarily know for you how effective it is.
” Later in the interview , Dr. Fauci agreed , with some trepidation , with Jake Tapper ’ s assessment that Christmas “ is probably not going to be possible.
” Dr. Fauci responded that people “ can ’ t abandon fundamental public health measures ” until the vaccine has been somewhat widely distributed .
That might not be until the second @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As the interview turned toward the “ models ” calling for massive numbers of COVID-19 deaths over the winter , Dr. Fauci claimed that calls for another 200,000 deaths in the US over the coming 4 months ( a rate many times higher than where we are currently ) could come to pass if people don ’ t obey new COVID-19 restrictions ( exactly what he said last time ) .
At this time , Dr. Fauci said that while a national lockdown doesn ’ t seem to be imminent , if the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be possible .
Finally , Dr. Fauci also discussed the importance of making sure the vaccines appear safe , an issue we touched upon earlier today .

By Tyler Durden
Across the US, millions of Americans are planning on scaled-back Thanksgiving dinners, with only members of their immediate family “bubbles” invited. Mayors of some of America’s large cities, along with the governors of California, Oregon and Washington State, have asked residents to limit travel over the holidays.
As angst about the spoiled Thanksgiving holiday simmers, Dr. Anthony Fauci acknowledged Sunday during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” that American families should probably prepare to skip Christmas dinner, too.
While Dr. Fauci has repeatedly praised Pfizer and Moderna, and assured the American public that the FDA’s first vaccine emergency-use authorization could be handed down within days, he cautioned during Sunday’s interview that people should continue to wear masks and observe social distancing even after they’ve been vaccinated.
It’s just the latest unsettling hint that social distancing requirements could be here to stay.
I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you’ve been vaccinated,” Fauci said during an appearance on CNN’s State of the Union. “Because even though for the general population it might be 90% to 95% effective, you don’t necessarily know for you how effective it is.”
Later in the interview, Dr. Fauci agreed, with some trepidation, with Jake Tapper’s assessment that Christmas “is probably not going to be possible.”
CNN's Jake Tapper this morning: "Christmas is probably not gonna be possible." pic.twitter.com/z56ifNCr3G — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 15, 2020
Dr. Fauci responded that people “can’t abandon fundamental public health measures” until the vaccine has been somewhat widely distributed. That might not be until the second or third quarter of next year.
As the interview turned toward the “models” calling for massive numbers of COVID-19 deaths over the winter, Dr. Fauci claimed that calls for another 200,000 deaths in the US over the coming 4 months (a rate many times higher than where we are currently) could come to pass if people don’t obey new COVID-19 restrictions (exactly what he said last time). At this time, Dr. Fauci said that while a national lockdown doesn’t seem to be imminent, if the situation continues to worsen, anything might be possible.
Watch the full interview below:
"There is light at the end of the tunnel. Help is coming and that should…motivate people to just say, 'We're going to double down and do this uniformly.' Those are the tools we have."
– Dr. Anthony Fauci on wearing masks and social distancing while awaiting a Covid-19 vaccine. pic.twitter.com/BEzMJBeo5o — State of the Union (@CNNSotu) November 15, 2020
Finally, Dr. Fauci also discussed the importance of making sure the vaccines appear safe, an issue we touched upon earlier today.
Source: Zero Hedge
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt