renegadetribune--2020-05-18--Trump DOJ Wants More Tools To Take Your Guns After Arming Police with Military Weapons Years Ago

The Trump Department of Justice is asking Congress for more enforcement resources for guns , amid surging sales in firearms in the last past couple months due to the CV pandemic .
These measures include confiscating guns from people who shouldn ’ t legally be able to own them according to the DOJ .
If a background check is still ongoing and unresolved after three days , the gun buyer is allowed to take the weapon home .
However , if the NICS system concludes that someone has taken a weapon home who shouldn ’ t have been able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go retrieve it .
This creates a massive problem since recently gun sales have surged .
Alone the FBI ran more than 2.9 million background checks in April 2020 , the most April background checks since 1999 according to its website .
Then in March , it ran a whopping 3.7 million background checks — the most in any month since November 1998 , when the FBI originally launched the NICS program , according to the FBI .
Meanwhile , the Trump government repealed a ban on selling police military weapons in 2017 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The repealed law lifted a 2015 military weapons ban by his predecessor former President Barack Obama .
The order effectively banned armored vehicles and large-caliber weapons from being acquired by local police departments across the nation , which effectively declares war on America ’ s streets .
Obama ’ s Executive order 13688 banned the use of Defense Department armored vehicles , bayonets , grenade launchers , camouflage uniforms , and large-caliber weapons and ammunition from America ’ s law enforcement .
With that act now repealed , Trump is allowing weapons made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United States – weapons that are designed to kill .
That ’ s not all the order prohibited ; the purchase of weaponized aircraft such as drones , manned aircraft , armored and tactical vehicles command and control vehicles and more , according to Popular Mechanics .
Congress enacted the National Defense Authorization Act in 1990 , then called the 1208 program .
In 1997 , Congress replaced Section 1208 of the NDAA with Section 1033 , which allowed the Pentagon to give their excess equipment to police fighting the war on drugs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counterterrorism to the bill , opening up a new list of equipment to be used by the police for whatever reason they saw fit under the 1033 program .
The issue is what makes someone ineligible to own/purchase a firearm for protection ?
At least a partial answer can be found in 2017 , when the U.S. government increased its physical and digital surveillance of “ homegrown violent extremists ” mentioned in the Department of Defense ’ s manual .
The change was actually announced under the Obama administration but carried on to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forms of monitoring of U.S. persons without a court-issued warrant , a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment , Activist Post reported .
Obama ’ s DHS didn ’ t hesitate to call those who believe in conspiracy theories potential right-wing terrorists , stating the following points might make someone a terrorist in a study by the University of Maryland , which was funded in part by the Department of Homeland Security .
• Americans who “ are fiercely nationalistic , as opposed to universal and international in orientation ” • Americans who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” • Americans who are “ reverent of individual liberty ( especially their right to own guns and be free of taxes ) ” • Americans exhibiting a belief in “ conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty and a belief that one ’ s personal and/or national way of life is under attack ” Specifically listing Americans who love liberty as terrorists , noting that two subgroups of “ right-wing extremism ” were identified as “ gun rights ” and “ tax protest , ” according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the leadership under them inside agencies only sees a shift by the replacing of the heads of the agencies .
However , policies and stigmas inside stick with those in the intelligence community .
In fact , Trump ’ s government , U.S. National Counterintelligence and Security Center ( NCSC ) stressed in its latest report that hacktivists and “ public disclosure organizations ” like WikiLeaks pose a “ significant threat ” similar to that of the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda terrorists , as well as Russia , Iran , and China .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ these are the types of people the government would seek to try to prevent from owning a firearm ; that , and presumably those with mental health issues .
However , Trump himself signed a law making it easier for mentally ill persons to obtain a gun in 2017 .
Then two years later , two days before the House passed sweeping gun legislation that would enable stronger universal background checks for most gun purchases , Trump threatened a presidential veto on the legislation if it passed Congress .
It is hard to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it comes to the Second Amendment , although with the DOJ asking Congress for “ more enforcement resources , ” one has to wonder who they deem “ unfit ” to own a firearm .
Further being flooded with purchasers of weapons , retrieving some of those guns would be a long drawn-out process due to the influx of buyers , as the FBI documented with its background checks surpassing most times in recent history .
Since 9/11 , police departments across the country have been able to acquire U.S. military equipment that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that banned equipment can now be used likely in a riot type scenario including drones , all while U.S. citizens who are deemed not eligible to own firearms are being threatened with seizure by the feds .
Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post , where this article first appeared .

By Aaron Kesel
The Trump Department of Justice is asking Congress for more enforcement resources for guns, amid surging sales in firearms in the last past couple months due to the CV pandemic. These measures include confiscating guns from people who shouldn’t legally be able to own them according to the DOJ.
Yahoo News reports:
In recent outreach to Capitol Hill, DOJ made two requests related to the spike in gun purchases, according to two sources with knowledge of those asks. First, the department asked for funding to help the FBI hire more staff to keep up with the growing number of background checks and appeal requests going through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. The bureau runs that system, which handles background checks on millions of gun buyers every year.
Yahoo further reports:
The department also asked for more resources and personnel for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to deal with firearm retrievals and other field work related to delayed denials, according to the two sources. The term “delayed denials” refers to situations in which people buy weapons and take them home before the NICS system can flag those buyers as ineligible to own guns.
If a background check is still ongoing and unresolved after three days, the gun buyer is allowed to take the weapon home. However, if the NICS system concludes that someone has taken a weapon home who shouldn’t have been able to, then agents from ATF have to go retrieve it.
This creates a massive problem since recently gun sales have surged. Alone the FBI ran more than 2.9 million background checks in April 2020, the most April background checks since 1999 according to its website. Then in March, it ran a whopping 3.7 million background checks — the most in any month since November 1998, when the FBI originally launched the NICS program, according to the FBI.
Meanwhile, the Trump government repealed a ban on selling police military weapons in 2017, as Activist Post previously reported. The repealed law lifted a 2015 military weapons ban by his predecessor former President Barack Obama. The order effectively banned armored vehicles and large-caliber weapons from being acquired by local police departments across the nation, which effectively declares war on America’s streets.
Obama’s Executive order 13688 banned the use of Defense Department armored vehicles, bayonets, grenade launchers, camouflage uniforms, and large-caliber weapons and ammunition from America’s law enforcement. With that act now repealed, Trump is allowing weapons made for war onto the streets of the United States – weapons that are designed to kill.
That’s not all the order prohibited; the purchase of weaponized aircraft such as drones, manned aircraft, armored and tactical vehicles command and control vehicles and more, according to Popular Mechanics.
Congress enacted the National Defense Authorization Act in 1990, then called the 1208 program. In 1997, Congress replaced Section 1208 of the NDAA with Section 1033, which allowed the Pentagon to give their excess equipment to police fighting the war on drugs. They further added a section about counterterrorism to the bill, opening up a new list of equipment to be used by the police for whatever reason they saw fit under the 1033 program.
The issue is what makes someone ineligible to own/purchase a firearm for protection? At least a partial answer can be found in 2017, when the U.S. government increased its physical and digital surveillance of “homegrown violent extremists” mentioned in the Department of Defense’s manual.
The change was actually announced under the Obama administration but carried on to the Trump administration. This allows some forms of monitoring of U.S. persons without a court-issued warrant, a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment, Activist Post reported.
Obama’s DHS didn’t hesitate to call those who believe in conspiracy theories potential right-wing terrorists, stating the following points might make someone a terrorist in a study by the University of Maryland, which was funded in part by the Department of Homeland Security.
Americans who “are fiercely nationalistic, as opposed to universal and international in orientation”
Americans considering themselves “anti-global”
Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
Americans who are “reverent of individual liberty (especially their right to own guns and be free of taxes)”
Americans exhibiting a belief in “conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty and a belief that one’s personal and/or national way of life is under attack”
Specifically listing Americans who love liberty as terrorists, noting that two subgroups of “right-wing extremism” were identified as “gun rights” and “tax protest,” according to PJ Media.
While presidents change, the leadership under them inside agencies only sees a shift by the replacing of the heads of the agencies. However, policies and stigmas inside stick with those in the intelligence community. In fact, Trump’s government, U.S. National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) stressed in its latest report that hacktivists and “public disclosure organizations” like WikiLeaks pose a “significant threat” similar to that of the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda terrorists, as well as Russia, Iran, and China.
It’s just a guess but these are the types of people the government would seek to try to prevent from owning a firearm; that, and presumably those with mental health issues. However, Trump himself signed a law making it easier for mentally ill persons to obtain a gun in 2017. Then two years later, two days before the House passed sweeping gun legislation that would enable stronger universal background checks for most gun purchases, Trump threatened a presidential veto on the legislation if it passed Congress.
It is hard to tell where this administration currently stands when it comes to the Second Amendment, although with the DOJ asking Congress for “more enforcement resources,” one has to wonder who they deem “unfit” to own a firearm. Further being flooded with purchasers of weapons, retrieving some of those guns would be a long drawn-out process due to the influx of buyers, as the FBI documented with its background checks surpassing most times in recent history.
Since 9/11, police departments across the country have been able to acquire U.S. military equipment that was temporarily banned under Obama. All that banned equipment can now be used likely in a riot type scenario including drones, all while U.S. citizens who are deemed not eligible to own firearms are being threatened with seizure by the feds.
**By [@An0nkn0wledge](https://hive.blog/@an0nkn0wledge)**
Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post, where this article first appeared.
Image: SHTFplan.com
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-05-17--Herbert von Karajan – Maestro for the Screen

Herbert von Karajan debuted in Salzburg in 1929 and then joined the NSDAP in 1933 , becoming a favorite conductor @ @ @ @ @ had even more success after the war .
This documentary has a good deal of @ @ @ @ @ take it all with a grain of salt .

Herbert von Karajan debuted in Salzburg in 1929 and then joined the NSDAP in 1933, becoming a favorite conductor in the Reich, and had even more success after the war. This documentary has a good deal of bias against Karajan, so take it all with a grain of salt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgKW8wWlYT4
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-05-17--The Cremation Furnaces of Auschwitz: A Technical and Historical Study

The problem of the cremations at Auschwitz – one of the most important and still unresolved questions in the orthodox historiography of that camp – started to come out of the general hysteria to which it had been relegated for decades and to take on some scientific qualities only in 1989 , thanks to Jean-Claude Pressac ( Pressac 1989 ) .
The merits of the French researcher , however , stopped there : while he did indeed try to approach the problem from a scientific standpoint , his argumentative procedure and his conclusions make a rigorous scientific treatment of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Mattogno 2010 , esp .
chapter 9 ) ; his severe lack of technical training shows through also in his second work on Auschwitz ( Pressac 1993 ; cf .
Mattogno 2011 ) .
This deficiency has become even more serious , because now that Pressac is no longer with us , the problem of the Auschwitz cremations has relapsed into the propagandistic hysteria of the immediate post-war years , as is highlight by a number of pseudo-scientific works on the issue : ➢ The first case in point is Robert Jan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( van Pelt 2002 ) , which I have dealt with thoroughly elsewhere ( Mattogno 2010 , esp .
chapter 12 ) .
➢ The collective work by Assmann et al .
of the same year about the Topf company , which had supplied the cremation furnaces for Auschwitz , is absolutely devoid of any technical and scientific character and supplies no new information on the Topf furnaces at Auschwitz ( Assmann/Hiddemann/Schwarzenberger 2002 ) .
➢ The recent Encyclopedia of Cremation ( Davies/Mates 2005 ) , though claiming to be scientific , devotes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ page ( p. 66 ) which is based on the works of Danuta Czech , Franciszek Piper and JeanClaude Pressac !
➢ Just as inconsistent are the pages which Norbert Fischer devoted to Auschwitz and the other German concentration camps in a text on cremations in Germany ( Fischer 1996 , ch .
5.3b , pp .
260-265 ) .
The only really substantial source is the website on Topf , which provides various significant documents ( www.TopfundSoehne.de ) .
Personally , I started to become generally involved in the study of cremations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ following year brought the onset of the valuable cooperation with Franco Deana , doctor of engineering , which was essential for the technical foundation of this study .
In the intensive correspondence that ensued , he has always been a rich source of explanations and of technical arguments for the many points of discussion .
His name must therefore stand on the front page of this work , together with that of the author .
Sadly , Franco Deana passed away in 2005 .
Just as precious has been the support of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away already in 1991 .
Thanks to him , as well as others , I was able to visit , for the first time , the camps of Buchenwald , Dachau , Mauthausen and Gusen .
Initially my studies centered upon such technical problems as the duration of the cremation process and the corresponding requirements for fuel .
The publication of Pressac ’ s first book in 1989 prompted me to widen the perspective of my approach and to include the historical context as well .
When the work had been completed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book , brought to light the enormous amount of documentary evidence concerning the Auschwitz crematoria that had been preserved in the Moscow archives of Viborgskaya .
An update of my study on the basis of the new documents that Pressac had identified ( some of which I had already seen as copies in the Auschwitz Museum ’ s archive ) appeared a year later ( Gauss 1994 , pp .
281-320 ) .
In 1995 , together with Jürgen Graf and the late Russell Granata , I was able to view , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some 88,200 pages of documents stemming from the Auschwitz Central Construction Office ( Zentralbauleitung ) .
The collection contains a massive correspondence between that office and the Topf & Söhne Company of Erfurt , which had built the Auschwitz cremation furnaces .
In 1997 and 1998 I found further important documents in Poland and Holland .
In the spring of 1999 I visited , among many other sites , the Museum and the crematorium at Terezín ( Theresienstadt ) , which both turned out to be of considerable importance for the purposes of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the summer of that year I examined the files kept in the municipal archives of the city of Erfurt which , since 5 August 1996 , has been preserving a highly informative documentation on all the activities of the Topf Co. , not limited to the mere question of crematoria .
An overview of this documentation was published as an article in 2000 ( Gauss 2000 , pp .
373-412 ; Rudolf 2003 , ditto ) and a more extensive summary followed in 2009 ( Mattogno 2009 , pp .
210-294 ; English @ @ @ @ @ @ @ passage of time , the initial scope of the study broadened considerably , both into the historical domain and into the field of technology , and a publication in separate volumes thus became necessary : one for the text as such ( the present Part 1 ) and the two others for the corresponding voluminous documents ( Part 2 , in black & white ) and the photographs ( Part 3 , in color ) .
Various difficulties and obstacles have delayed the publication of this study until today .
In the meantime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ search for and collect more sources and documents .
The cremation furnaces of Auschwitz , fired by means of coke-fed gasifiers , constituted a development – or rather a simplification – of the civilian types ; however ( as I found out in the early stages of my work ) it is difficult to locate detailed information on these furnaces even in the specialized literature .
I therefore decided to place , at the head of the specific topic of the present study , a rigorous introductory treatment of those furnaces as Section @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Furthermore , in view of the fact that cremation furnaces are , fundamentally speaking , nothing but combustion devices , I felt that it would be helpful for the reader to become , on the one hand , acquainted with the general principles of combustion technology and the chemical processes a cremation furnace with a coke-fed gasifier , supplemented by a detailed description of its structure and its operation .
In this way the reader will come to a better understanding of cremation technology , and a better ability to evaluate the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which come into play during a cremation , and on the other hand with the theoretical and structural principles of a cremation furnace with a coke-fed gasifier , supplemented by a detailed description of its structure and its operation .
In this way the reader will come to a better understanding of cremation technology , and a better ability to evaluate the Holocaust accounts of cremations at Auschwitz .
Finally , as the Auschwitz cremation furnaces were products of the technology of their era , I felt that it would be useful to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cremation in modern times with a particular emphasis on furnaces with coke-fed gasifiers such as those at Auschwitz , but without leaving aside systems based on other energy sources – gas , naphtha ( oil ) or electricity .
In this way the reader can appreciate the technological development of these combustion devices from the latter decades of the 19th century through the Second World War , with all the technical problems which had to be solved .
This historical presentation of cremation furnaces is complemented by a parallel study of devices for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( in connection with wars or epidemics ) and finds its conclusion in a brief analysis of the cremation furnaces of today .
The scientific cremation experiments carried out in Germany ( and in Switzerland ) at the end of the 1920s provide us with a solid experimental basis for tackling and resolving the essential questions of the duration and the corresponding fuel consumption for a cremation in a cremation furnace with a coke-fed gasifier ; these aspects will be analyzed in detail in two specific chapters .
Aiming for a comprehensive presentation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I have not neglected the legal and statistical aspects of cremation , especially for the case of Germany .
The above topics are presented in Section I of the present volume ; by their very nature , these topics extend into the present , therefore the treatment of the problems will often refer to our day and age , especially when it comes to the description of the various devices .
In Section II , I have primarily outlined the activities of the Topf company in the field of the design and construction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devices , describing in detail the structure and the operation of the various types of Topf cremation furnaces , heated by means of coke , gas or electricity .
I have also presented the numerous patents ( and patent applications ) granted , acquired or filed between the 1920s and the 1950s .
After this general introduction concerning the Topf line of cremation furnaces for civilian use , I have taken up the cremation devices which the company supplied or designed for the concentration camps , starting with those for Dachau and Gusen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
cremation chambers , heated with oil ( naphtha ) and later converted to coke ) .
At this point we enter the core topic of the present work , which begins with a documented history of the construction of cremation furnaces at AuschwitzBirkenau .
It is followed by a detailed technical description of the structure and the operation of these devices – the furnaces with two , three and eight muffles – and a survey of the Topf projects for mass incineration in that camp .
The three fundamental questions – the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capacity of the furnaces and the fuel consumption – will then be treated for the Topf cremation furnaces at Auschwitz-Birkenau in a scientifically rigorous fashion on the basis of a wide variety of documents .
For the determination of the duration of the cremation process , I have based myself primarily on experimental data , in particular those resulting from the cremation experiments with a coke-fired furnace undertaken by the engineer R. Kessler in Germany at the end of the 1920s and those stemming from the experiments with a gas-fired furnace done by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1970s , as well as on the detailed description of 15 cremations carried out in a modern gasfired furnace as part of a study in forensic medicine .
I have also taken into account a large portion of a list of cremations at Gusen and the nearly complete list of cremations at the Westerbork crematorium .
The name lists of cremations in the Terezín ( Theresienstadt ) crematorium ( a vast sampling of 717 cremations carried out between 3 October and 15 November 1943 , over 41 days of operation ) furnish us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ account inasmuch as the average duration resulting for these cases constitutes the lower documented limit that could be achieved in the cremation devices of that period .
The result of the study – that the average duration of the cremation process was one hour – is confirmed also by the statements given by the Topf engineer Kurt Prüfer , the designer of the furnaces with three and with eight muffles , and by Karl Schultze , who had designed and built the blower for the former .
The section dealing with the capacity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preliminary evaluation of the limits to the continuous operation of the devices ( imposed by the unavoidable formation and the necessary removal of slag from the hearth ) and to the loading of the muffles , i.e .
an evaluation of the possibility of burning simultaneously , in a useful manner , more than one corpse in one muffle .
This possibility is ruled out on the basis of experimental data ( tests run in the crematoria at Westerbork and Gusen , as well as in slaughterhouses ) .
The Topf furnaces at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and attempts at extending their technical limits provided no advantage with respect to the economy of the cremation .
The Polish and Soviet expert reports on the coke-fired cremation furnaces of the Lublin-Majdanek , Sachsenhausen and Stutthof concentration camps , which are presented here for the first time in English translation and with their propagandistic embellishments removed , supply us with an indirect confirmation of this view .
In the present treatise I have not limited myself to the mere verification of numerical data , but I have also examined the historical question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the construction of the crematoria furnaces at Auschwitz-Birkenau .
The heat balance – i.e .
the calculation of the coke consumption of the furnaces – is based on a sound experimental footing : the consumption of the Topf doublemuffle furnace in the crematorium at Gusen with its average consumption of 30.6 kg of coke for 677 individual cremations .
Compared to my summary of 1994 ( Gauss 1994 pp .
281-320 ) , the heat balance presented today has a foundation which is methodically superior : whereas the former was based on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Gusen furnace , the balance offered here analyzes and explains those very data which constitute the departure point of the calculation ; this has led to results diverging from those previously published , but to an almost insignificant degree ( the standard deviation is less than 8 % ) .
The calculation takes into account the technical data concerning coke , the furnaces ( with a detailed computation of the hourly heat loss by radiation and conduction of the Gusen furnace and of the double- and triple-muffle furnaces at Auschwitz-Birkenau ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into three types : normal , average and lean .
The fuel consumption ( including total combustion air , theoretical air consumption and excess air ) is derived for each type of furnace and for each type of corpse .
The analysis of the thermal balance of the Auschwitz-Birkenau furnaces , moreover , evidences a design error for the triple muffle furnace , on account of which the combustion gases fed to or forming in the central muffle did not have enough dwell time to burn completely but were sucked up by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flue ducts .
This phenomenon caused serious damage to the refractory lining of the flue ducts and of the chimney of Crematorium II at Birkenau in March 1943 .
But could this surge of flames also show on the outside and produce the phenomenon of flaming chimneys ?
On the basis of calculations , these flames should have exhausted themselves within the smoke ducts of the crematoria .
However , in order to verify this experimentally , I have conducted two experiments with animal grease in a simple furnace I built for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out the theoretical data .
For a better judgment regarding the Topf cremation furnaces at AuschwitzBirkenau I have also made an extensive analysis of the oil- and coke-fired furnaces supplied to the concentration camps by Topf ’ s major competitor , the Hans Kori Co. of Berlin , as well as those installed at the Terezín camp by Ignis-Hüttenbau Co. , undoubtedly the most efficient devices built anywhere in Europe in the 1940s .
The final problem dealt with in Section II concerns the legal dispositions regarding the cremations in the concentration camps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use there with those requirements .
In that context , I have quoted in extenso the important “ Decree concerning the conduct of cremations in the crematorium of the Sachsenhausen concentration camp ” issued by Himmler on 28 February 1940 , showing that – initially at least – the customary use of coffins and urns for the ashes was the rule .
To make the text more easily readable , I have added an Appendix which contains the long lists of cremation statistics for Westerbork and Terezín ( altogether 41 tables ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Topf Co. at Auschwitz-Birkenau , and a list of the patents as well as patent applications and patent descriptions of the Topf Co. As the translation of German technical terms in the field of furnace technology sometimes presents difficulties even for persons fluent in the language , I have added a glossary , which also contains the essential explanations .
As far as the administrative terms which appear in this work are concerned , I refer the reader to the glossary of my study on the Central Construction Office at Auschwitz ( Mattogno @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The present work is strictly based on unimpeachable primary sources .
Published sources are listed in the bibliography , whereas the documentary references are given in the footnotes .
I have , above all , brought together the German historical and technical literature which exists on this subject , supplementing it with the patents concerning civilian systems to the extent that such documents still exist ( many have been lost on account of Allied air raids ) .
At the same time I have been in touch with various manufacturers of cremation equipment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Italy and France .
For a better understanding of the functioning of the Topf and the Kori systems , I have studied the available German documents , especially those of the Central Construction Office at Auschwitz as well as other documents preserved in various European archives .
As a result , Part 2 of this study contains 300 documents , many of which heretofore unpublished or unknown even to specialists .
The first 109 documents concern civilian cremation systems , nos .
110 through 162 refer to the civilian activities of the Topf @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through 300 , finally , we have a selection of the most important documents regarding the Topf cremation systems at Mauthausen , Gusen , Buchenwald and Auschwitz-Birkenau ( plans , drawings , proposals , cost estimates , shipping documents , invoices , operating instructions , diagrams etc . )
, regarding the Kori systems in the camps mentioned ( especially original drawings and very detailed drawings prepared by the Soviet experts ) , regarding technical and administrative questions , and on the bureaucratic formalities for cremations in the concentration camps .
In addition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also inspected and taken photos of devices still existing in German concentration camps at : ➢ Auschwitz : 2 double-muffle Topf furnaces poorly rebuilt by the Poles ; the mobile oil-fired Kori furnace ; ➢ Buchenwald : 2 coke-fired triple-muffle Topf furnaces ( one adapted for optional use with oil ) identical to those installed in Crematoria II and III at Birkenau ; ➢ Mauthausen : 1 double-muffle coke-fired furnace identical to the 3 doublemuffle furnaces installed at Crematorium 1 of the Auschwitz main camp : 1 coke-fired Kori furnace ; In Part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illustrated the description of these devices with 370 photos – most of them in color – divided into twelve sections , each one corresponding to a specific device .
This collection contains illustrations of devices heretofore unknown ( the furnaces of the Terezín crematorium Photos 345-362 ) or unfamiliar even to specialists , such as the photos of the furnaces at Gusen ( Photos 1-35 ) , Gross-Rosen ( Photos 332-334 ) , Stutthof ( Photos 270-284 and 328f . )
, as well as Lublin-Majdanek ( Photos 285-327 ) .
However , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constitute a relevant contribution inasmuch as they depict , for the first time , the essential components of these units , which is indispensable for an understanding of their structure and their way of operation .
Although intended mainly for the specialist , this three-volume study will also allow the interested layman to become acquainted with the problems treated here ; even though he may not have the specific prerequisites in this field , he will thus be given all the tools needed for a verification of the soundness of the conclusions drawn @

By Carlo Mattogno
Preface
The problem of the cremations at Auschwitz – one of the most important and still unresolved questions in the orthodox historiography of that camp – started to come out of the general hysteria to which it had been relegated for decades and to take on some scientific qualities only in 1989, thanks to Jean-Claude Pressac (Pressac 1989). The merits of the French researcher, however, stopped there: while he did indeed try to approach the problem from a scientific standpoint, his argumentative procedure and his conclusions make a rigorous scientific treatment of the matter all the more pressing (cf. Mattogno 2010, esp. chapter 9); his severe lack of technical training shows through also in his second work on Auschwitz (Pressac 1993; cf. Mattogno 2011).
This deficiency has become even more serious, because now that Pressac is no longer with us, the problem of the Auschwitz cremations has relapsed into the propagandistic hysteria of the immediate post-war years, as is highlight by a number of pseudo-scientific works on the issue:
➢ The first case in point is Robert Jan van Pelt’s study on Auschwitz (van Pelt 2002), which I have dealt with thoroughly elsewhere (Mattogno 2010, esp. chapter 12).
➢ The collective work by Assmann et al. of the same year about the Topf company, which had supplied the cremation furnaces for Auschwitz, is absolutely devoid of any technical and scientific character and supplies no new information on the Topf furnaces at Auschwitz (Assmann/Hiddemann/Schwarzenberger 2002).
➢ The recent Encyclopedia of Cremation (Davies/Mates 2005), though claiming to be scientific, devotes to “Auschwitz” one purely propagandistic page (p. 66) which is based on the works of Danuta Czech, Franciszek Piper and JeanClaude Pressac!
➢ Just as inconsistent are the pages which Norbert Fischer devoted to Auschwitz and the other German concentration camps in a text on cremations in Germany (Fischer 1996, ch. 5.3b, pp. 260-265).
The only really substantial source is the website on Topf, which provides various significant documents (www.TopfundSoehne.de).
Personally, I started to become generally involved in the study of cremations in the summer of 1987. The following year brought the onset of the valuable cooperation with Franco Deana, doctor of engineering, which was essential for the technical foundation of this study. In the intensive correspondence that ensued, he has always been a rich source of explanations and of technical arguments for the many points of discussion. His name must therefore stand on the front page of this work, together with that of the author. Sadly, Franco Deana passed away in 2005. Just as precious has been the support of the German engineer H.N. who unfortunately passed away already in 1991. Thanks to him, as well as others, I was able to visit, for the first time, the camps of Buchenwald, Dachau, Mauthausen and Gusen.
Initially my studies centered upon such technical problems as the duration of the cremation process and the corresponding requirements for fuel. The publication of Pressac’s first book in 1989 prompted me to widen the perspective of my approach and to include the historical context as well.
When the work had been completed in 1993, Pressac, in his second book, brought to light the enormous amount of documentary evidence concerning the Auschwitz crematoria that had been preserved in the Moscow archives of Viborgskaya. An update of my study on the basis of the new documents that Pressac had identified (some of which I had already seen as copies in the Auschwitz Museum’s archive) appeared a year later (Gauss 1994, pp. 281-320).
In 1995, together with Jürgen Graf and the late Russell Granata, I was able to view, in the Moscow archives, the collection of some 88,200 pages of documents stemming from the Auschwitz Central Construction Office (Zentralbauleitung). The collection contains a massive correspondence between that office and the Topf & Söhne Company of Erfurt, which had built the Auschwitz cremation furnaces. In 1997 and 1998 I found further important documents in Poland and Holland. In the spring of 1999 I visited, among many other sites, the Museum and the crematorium at Terezín (Theresienstadt), which both turned out to be of considerable importance for the purposes of the problem dealt with here. During the summer of that year I examined the files kept in the municipal archives of the city of Erfurt which, since 5 August 1996, has been preserving a highly informative documentation on all the activities of the Topf Co., not limited to the mere question of crematoria. An overview of this documentation was published as an article in 2000 (Gauss 2000, pp. 373-412; Rudolf 2003, ditto) and a more extensive summary followed in 2009 (Mattogno 2009, pp. 210-294; English 2010, 229-320).
With the passage of time, the initial scope of the study broadened considerably, both into the historical domain and into the field of technology, and a publication in separate volumes thus became necessary: one for the text as such (the present Part 1) and the two others for the corresponding voluminous documents (Part 2, in black & white) and the photographs (Part 3, in color).
Various difficulties and obstacles have delayed the publication of this study until today. In the meantime, though, I have continued to search for and collect more sources and documents.
The cremation furnaces of Auschwitz, fired by means of coke-fed gasifiers, constituted a development – or rather a simplification – of the civilian types; however (as I found out in the early stages of my work) it is difficult to locate detailed information on these furnaces even in the specialized literature. I therefore decided to place, at the head of the specific topic of the present study, a rigorous introductory treatment of those furnaces as Section I of Part 1 of this study.
Furthermore, in view of the fact that cremation furnaces are, fundamentally speaking, nothing but combustion devices, I felt that it would be helpful for the reader to become, on the one hand, acquainted with the general principles of combustion technology and the chemical processes a cremation furnace with a coke-fed gasifier, supplemented by a detailed description of its structure and its operation. In this way the reader will come to a better understanding of cremation technology, and a better ability to evaluate the Holocaust accounts of cremations at Auschwitz. which come into play during a cremation, and on the other hand with the theoretical and structural principles of a cremation furnace with a coke-fed gasifier, supplemented by a detailed description of its structure and its operation. In this way the reader will come to a better understanding of cremation technology, and a better ability to evaluate the Holocaust accounts of cremations at Auschwitz.
Finally, as the Auschwitz cremation furnaces were products of the technology of their era, I felt that it would be useful to present an overview of the history of cremation in modern times with a particular emphasis on furnaces with coke-fed gasifiers such as those at Auschwitz, but without leaving aside systems based on other energy sources – gas, naphtha (oil) or electricity. In this way the reader can appreciate the technological development of these combustion devices from the latter decades of the 19th century through the Second World War, with all the technical problems which had to be solved. This historical presentation of cremation furnaces is complemented by a parallel study of devices for mass cremations for sanitary and hygienic reasons (in connection with wars or epidemics) and finds its conclusion in a brief analysis of the cremation furnaces of today.
The scientific cremation experiments carried out in Germany (and in Switzerland) at the end of the 1920s provide us with a solid experimental basis for tackling and resolving the essential questions of the duration and the corresponding fuel consumption for a cremation in a cremation furnace with a coke-fed gasifier; these aspects will be analyzed in detail in two specific chapters. Aiming for a comprehensive presentation of the subject of this book, I have not neglected the legal and statistical aspects of cremation, especially for the case of Germany. The above topics are presented in Section I of the present volume; by their very nature, these topics extend into the present, therefore the treatment of the problems will often refer to our day and age, especially when it comes to the description of the various devices.
In Section II, I have primarily outlined the activities of the Topf company in the field of the design and construction of civilian cremation furnaces and other combustion devices, describing in detail the structure and the operation of the various types of Topf cremation furnaces, heated by means of coke, gas or electricity. I have also presented the numerous patents (and patent applications) granted, acquired or filed between the 1920s and the 1950s.
After this general introduction concerning the Topf line of cremation furnaces for civilian use, I have taken up the cremation devices which the company supplied or designed for the concentration camps, starting with those for Dachau and Gusen (furnaces with two muffles, i.e. cremation chambers, heated with oil (naphtha) and later converted to coke).
At this point we enter the core topic of the present work, which begins with a documented history of the construction of cremation furnaces at AuschwitzBirkenau. It is followed by a detailed technical description of the structure and the operation of these devices – the furnaces with two, three and eight muffles – and a survey of the Topf projects for mass incineration in that camp. The three fundamental questions – the duration of the cremation process, the capacity of the furnaces and the fuel consumption – will then be treated for the Topf cremation furnaces at Auschwitz-Birkenau in a scientifically rigorous fashion on the basis of a wide variety of documents.
For the determination of the duration of the cremation process, I have based myself primarily on experimental data, in particular those resulting from the cremation experiments with a coke-fired furnace undertaken by the engineer R. Kessler in Germany at the end of the 1920s and those stemming from the experiments with a gas-fired furnace done by Dr. E. Jones in England in the 1970s, as well as on the detailed description of 15 cremations carried out in a modern gasfired furnace as part of a study in forensic medicine.
I have also taken into account a large portion of a list of cremations at Gusen and the nearly complete list of cremations at the Westerbork crematorium. The name lists of cremations in the Terezín (Theresienstadt) crematorium (a vast sampling of 717 cremations carried out between 3 October and 15 November 1943, over 41 days of operation) furnish us, moreover, with a very useful account inasmuch as the average duration resulting for these cases constitutes the lower documented limit that could be achieved in the cremation devices of that period.
The result of the study – that the average duration of the cremation process was one hour – is confirmed also by the statements given by the Topf engineer Kurt Prüfer, the designer of the furnaces with three and with eight muffles, and by Karl Schultze, who had designed and built the blower for the former.
The section dealing with the capacity of the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau contains a preliminary evaluation of the limits to the continuous operation of the devices (imposed by the unavoidable formation and the necessary removal of slag from the hearth) and to the loading of the muffles, i.e. an evaluation of the possibility of burning simultaneously, in a useful manner, more than one corpse in one muffle. This possibility is ruled out on the basis of experimental data (tests run in the crematoria at Westerbork and Gusen, as well as in slaughterhouses).
The Topf furnaces at Auschwitz-Birkenau were designed for individual cremations, and attempts at extending their technical limits provided no advantage with respect to the economy of the cremation. The Polish and Soviet expert reports on the coke-fired cremation furnaces of the Lublin-Majdanek, Sachsenhausen and Stutthof concentration camps, which are presented here for the first time in English translation and with their propagandistic embellishments removed, supply us with an indirect confirmation of this view.
In the present treatise I have not limited myself to the mere verification of numerical data, but I have also examined the historical question of the purpose of the design and the construction of the crematoria furnaces at Auschwitz-Birkenau.
The heat balance – i.e. the calculation of the coke consumption of the furnaces – is based on a sound experimental footing: the consumption of the Topf doublemuffle furnace in the crematorium at Gusen with its average consumption of 30.6 kg of coke for 677 individual cremations. Compared to my summary of 1994 (Gauss 1994 pp. 281-320), the heat balance presented today has a foundation which is methodically superior: whereas the former was based on a theoretical calculation corrected for the experimental data of the Gusen furnace, the balance offered here analyzes and explains those very data which constitute the departure point of the calculation; this has led to results diverging from those previously published, but to an almost insignificant degree (the standard deviation is less than 8%).
The calculation takes into account the technical data concerning coke, the furnaces (with a detailed computation of the hourly heat loss by radiation and conduction of the Gusen furnace and of the double- and triple-muffle furnaces at Auschwitz-Birkenau) and the corpses, which are divided into three types: normal, average and lean. The fuel consumption (including total combustion air, theoretical air consumption and excess air) is derived for each type of furnace and for each type of corpse.
The analysis of the thermal balance of the Auschwitz-Birkenau furnaces, moreover, evidences a design error for the triple muffle furnace, on account of which the combustion gases fed to or forming in the central muffle did not have enough dwell time to burn completely but were sucked up by the chimney draft and finished burning in the flue ducts. This phenomenon caused serious damage to the refractory lining of the flue ducts and of the chimney of Crematorium II at Birkenau in March 1943.
But could this surge of flames also show on the outside and produce the phenomenon of flaming chimneys? On the basis of calculations, these flames should have exhausted themselves within the smoke ducts of the crematoria. However, in order to verify this experimentally, I have conducted two experiments with animal grease in a simple furnace I built for the purpose. The experimental results fully bore out the theoretical data.
For a better judgment regarding the Topf cremation furnaces at AuschwitzBirkenau I have also made an extensive analysis of the oil- and coke-fired furnaces supplied to the concentration camps by Topf’s major competitor, the Hans Kori Co. of Berlin, as well as those installed at the Terezín camp by Ignis-Hüttenbau Co., undoubtedly the most efficient devices built anywhere in Europe in the 1940s.
The final problem dealt with in Section II concerns the legal dispositions regarding the cremations in the concentration camps and the compatibility of the furnaces in use there with those requirements. In that context, I have quoted in extenso the important “Decree concerning the conduct of cremations in the crematorium of the Sachsenhausen concentration camp” issued by Himmler on 28 February 1940, showing that – initially at least – the customary use of coffins and urns for the ashes was the rule.
To make the text more easily readable, I have added an Appendix which contains the long lists of cremation statistics for Westerbork and Terezín (altogether 41 tables), a synopsis of the activities of the Topf Co. at Auschwitz-Birkenau, and a list of the patents as well as patent applications and patent descriptions of the Topf Co.
As the translation of German technical terms in the field of furnace technology sometimes presents difficulties even for persons fluent in the language, I have added a glossary, which also contains the essential explanations. As far as the administrative terms which appear in this work are concerned, I refer the reader to the glossary of my study on the Central Construction Office at Auschwitz (Mattogno 2005, pp. 163-172).
The present work is strictly based on unimpeachable primary sources. Published sources are listed in the bibliography, whereas the documentary references are given in the footnotes.
I have, above all, brought together the German historical and technical literature which exists on this subject, supplementing it with the patents concerning civilian systems to the extent that such documents still exist (many have been lost on account of Allied air raids). At the same time I have been in touch with various manufacturers of cremation equipment and have personally visited several crematoria in Italy and France.
For a better understanding of the functioning of the Topf and the Kori systems, I have studied the available German documents, especially those of the Central Construction Office at Auschwitz as well as other documents preserved in various European archives. As a result, Part 2 of this study contains 300 documents, many of which heretofore unpublished or unknown even to specialists. The first 109 documents concern civilian cremation systems, nos. 110 through 162 refer to the civilian activities of the Topf Co., and under nos. 163 through 300, finally, we have a selection of the most important documents regarding the Topf cremation systems at Mauthausen, Gusen, Buchenwald and Auschwitz-Birkenau (plans, drawings, proposals, cost estimates, shipping documents, invoices, operating instructions, diagrams etc.), regarding the Kori systems in the camps mentioned (especially original drawings and very detailed drawings prepared by the Soviet experts), regarding technical and administrative questions, and on the bureaucratic formalities for cremations in the concentration camps.
In addition to my archival studies, I have also inspected and taken photos of devices still existing in German concentration camps at:
➢ Auschwitz: 2 double-muffle Topf furnaces poorly rebuilt by the Poles; the mobile oil-fired Kori furnace;
➢ Buchenwald: 2 coke-fired triple-muffle Topf furnaces (one adapted for optional use with oil) identical to those installed in Crematoria II and III at Birkenau;
➢ Dachau: 1 double-muffle coke-fired Topf furnace, originally a mobile furnace fired with oil; 4 coke-fired Kori furnaces;
➢ Gusen: 1 double-muffle coke-fired Topf furnace, originally a mobile furnace fired with oil;
➢ Mauthausen: 1 double-muffle coke-fired furnace identical to the 3 doublemuffle furnaces installed at Crematorium 1 of the Auschwitz main camp: 1 coke-fired Kori furnace;
➢ Gross-Rosen: 1 mobile oil-fired Kori furnace: ➢ Lublin: 5 coke-fired Kori furnaces; 1 mobile naphtha-fired Kori furnace;
➢ Stutthof: 2 coke-fired Kori furnaces; 1 mobile oil-fired Kori furnace;
➢ Terezín: 4 stationary oil-fired Ignis-Hüttenbau furnaces.
In Part 3 of this work I have extensively illustrated the description of these devices with 370 photos – most of them in color – divided into twelve sections, each one corresponding to a specific device. This collection contains illustrations of devices heretofore unknown (the furnaces of the Terezín crematorium Photos 345-362) or unfamiliar even to specialists, such as the photos of the furnaces at Gusen (Photos 1-35), Gross-Rosen (Photos 332-334), Stutthof (Photos 270-284 and 328f.), as well as Lublin-Majdanek (Photos 285-327). However, even the photos of the well-known devices constitute a relevant contribution inasmuch as they depict, for the first time, the essential components of these units, which is indispensable for an understanding of their structure and their way of operation.
Although intended mainly for the specialist, this three-volume study will also allow the interested layman to become acquainted with the problems treated here; even though he may not have the specific prerequisites in this field, he will thus be given all the tools needed for a verification of the soundness of the conclusions drawn.
Carlo Mattogno
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-05-17--Vladimir Putin Supports Forced Vaccination of Children

Now that the alt-right , led by Richard Spencer , has come out as rabidly pro-vaxx ( in light of the latest coronavirus hoax ) , it ’ s about time to remind ourselves what Putin ’ s own views on the matter are .
Many of the individuals who lead the alt-right are Russian assets , and as such , it should come as no surprise that they are as supportive of society-wide vaccination as the Kremlin is .
Here is an excerpt from a discussion between Russian vaccination-pushers and the Russian President : Y. Lobzin : Unfortunately , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trend .
I do not know who promotes it , where it comes from , because we have a lot of resistance against vaccinations , so if it was regulated on a national scale , it would be great .
Y. Zhulev : Yes .
Mr. President , we , as the patient community , do oppose these trends .
Y. Zhulev : When parents refuse to vaccinate their children .
They endanger the lives of their children .
V. Putin : You raised a very important issue .
They endanger the lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children at a school or kindergarten .
We badly need the interaction between specialists and public organisations .
Some administrative decisions may also be adopted .
Translation : Putin seeks to force parents to vaccinate their children using “ administrative measures.
” By no means was it the first time that Putin has come out as passionately pro-vaxx .
On an earlier occasion , Putin divulged that he personally gets the seasonal flu shots each and every year : V. Korableva : We have an interesting SMS on just this subject : which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or locally made ?
V. Putin : If it comes to that , it ’ s usually a case of catching a cold or something , and I make sure I get my vaccinations in time , before the flu season starts .
“ I make sure I get my vaccinations in time ” should be the new motto of Richard Spencer .
As expected , the totalitarian Russian government also looks to ban all rational discussion of vaccines : Fines for Promotion of Vaccination Refusal – The Russian Ministry of Health wants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for refusal of vaccination .
This was reported by Deputy Minister of Health Tatiana Yakovleva .
The ministry plans to amend the laws ” On information , information technologies and information security ” , ” On mass media ” and ” On immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases ” and the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation .
The legislative initiative , which Yakovleva stated , is not the first on the subject of vaccinations .
Former Minister of Healthcare of Tatarstan , now State Duma Deputy Ayrat Farrakhov has advanced the proposal ( the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Realnoe Vremya ) to oblige the authorities to report annually on vaccination to end the fake news that the anti-vaccination movement spreads .
Anyone who claims that Russia is “ an enemy of ZOG ” is a liar .
Russia is part and parcel of the global ZOG system .
It is interesting to note that everyone from Andrew Anglin ( whose mother just-so-happens to work at the Columbus Children ’ s Hospital in Ohio ) to Richard Spencer has been keeping mum on all of that , as if Russia “ can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why .
Another news item not reported by the shill-media is Russia ’ s vast vaccination campaign against measles .
Here ’ s what a recent resolution calls for : To prepare for the expanded immunization campaign and reduce the number of people resisting immunization , the resolution calls for reassessing the validity of medical waivers to vaccination that people present .
These measures were to be implemented by March 25 , 2019 .
Additionally , the resolution prescribes identification of vulnerable segments of the population ( both children and adults ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ permanent residency , refugees , internally displaced people , migrants , and those who did not receive scheduled vaccinations and who do not have immunity to measles .
Rospotrebnadzor will oversee the implementation of the immunization campaign and provide for proper transportation and storage of vaccines .
Yes , Russia sought to “ reduce the number of people resisting immunization , ” and so do all of its alt-right assets , such as Richard Spencer , seek to legitimize the mass involuntary vaccination of the American population .
The more one observes these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Spencer et al .
are the agents of foreign Zionist countries like Russia and Israel .
Vladimir Putin also mobilized the Russian army against the latest coronavirus hoax : Now it is obvious why the totally compromised alt-right is all aboard and in line with the vaccination agenda ; it ’ s because both Benjamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin are calling the shots , if you pardon the pun .
We can see what you ’ re up to , Spencer .

Now that the alt-right, led by Richard Spencer, has come out as rabidly pro-vaxx (in light of the latest coronavirus hoax), it’s about time to remind ourselves what Putin’s own views on the matter are. Many of the individuals who lead the alt-right are Russian assets, and as such, it should come as no surprise that they are as supportive of society-wide vaccination as the Kremlin is.
Here is an excerpt from a discussion between Russian vaccination-pushers and the Russian President:
Y. Lobzin: Unfortunately, Mr. President, there is an anti-vaccine trend. I do not know who promotes it, where it comes from, because we have a lot of resistance against vaccinations, so if it was regulated on a national scale, it would be great. Y. Zhulev: Yes. Mr. President, we, as the patient community, do oppose these trends. V. Putin: Which trends? Y. Zhulev: When parents refuse to vaccinate their children. They endanger the lives of their children. V. Putin: You raised a very important issue. They endanger the lives of their own children and also other children at a school or kindergarten. We badly need the interaction between specialists and public organisations. Some administrative decisions may also be adopted.
Translation: Putin seeks to force parents to vaccinate their children using “administrative measures.”
By no means was it the first time that Putin has come out as passionately pro-vaxx. On an earlier occasion, Putin divulged that he personally gets the seasonal flu shots each and every year:
V. Korableva: We have an interesting SMS on just this subject: which medicines does the President take, imported or locally made? V. Putin: If it comes to that, it’s usually a case of catching a cold or something, and I make sure I get my vaccinations in time, before the flu season starts.
“I make sure I get my vaccinations in time” should be the new motto of Richard Spencer.
As expected, the totalitarian Russian government also looks to ban all rational discussion of vaccines:
Fines for Promotion of Vaccination Refusal – The Russian Ministry of Health wants to fine the media and bloggers calling for refusal of vaccination. This was reported by Deputy Minister of Health Tatiana Yakovleva. The ministry plans to amend the laws ”On information, information technologies and information security”, ”On mass media” and ”On immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases” and the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. The legislative initiative, which Yakovleva stated, is not the first on the subject of vaccinations. Former Minister of Healthcare of Tatarstan, now State Duma Deputy Ayrat Farrakhov has advanced the proposal (the text of the bill is available to Realnoe Vremya) to oblige the authorities to report annually on vaccination to end the fake news that the anti-vaccination movement spreads.
Anyone who claims that Russia is “an enemy of ZOG” is a liar. Russia is part and parcel of the global ZOG system. It is interesting to note that everyone from Andrew Anglin (whose mother just-so-happens to work at the Columbus Children’s Hospital in Ohio) to Richard Spencer has been keeping mum on all of that, as if Russia “can do no wrong.” Gotta wonder why.
Another news item not reported by the shill-media is Russia’s vast vaccination campaign against measles. Here’s what a recent resolution calls for:
To prepare for the expanded immunization campaign and reduce the number of people resisting immunization, the resolution calls for reassessing the validity of medical waivers to vaccination that people present. These measures were to be implemented by March 25, 2019. Additionally, the resolution prescribes identification of vulnerable segments of the population (both children and adults), people leading nomadic lifestyles and/or those without permanent residency, refugees, internally displaced people, migrants, and those who did not receive scheduled vaccinations and who do not have immunity to measles. Rospotrebnadzor will oversee the implementation of the immunization campaign and provide for proper transportation and storage of vaccines.
Yes, Russia sought to “reduce the number of people resisting immunization,” and so do all of its alt-right assets, such as Richard Spencer, seek to legitimize the mass involuntary vaccination of the American population. The more one observes these facts, the more obvious it becomes that Spencer et al. are the agents of foreign Zionist countries like Russia and Israel.
Vladimir Putin also mobilized the Russian army against the latest coronavirus hoax:
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday called on the country’s Defense Ministry to engage in the fight against coronavirus. In a video conference with government officials, Putin said the Russian military should replicate measures other countries have adopted to stem the spread of the virus.
Now it is obvious why the totally compromised alt-right is all aboard and in line with the vaccination agenda; it’s because both Benjamin Netanyahu and Vladimir Putin are calling the shots, if you pardon the pun.
We can see what you’re up to, Spencer.
Share now!
Author: Odin's Intelligence Agency. Odin's Intelligence Agency.


renegadetribune--2020-05-17--Buy New Fashion Masks!

Buy New Fashion Masks!

Seeing Jake Morphonios from Blackstone Intelligence hocking masks to his audience inspired us to partner with a fashion designer to @ @ @ @ @

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-05-19--The Art Nouveau Goddesses of Louis Théophile Hingre

Art Nouveau was an artistic decorative style for architecture and applied arts which was mostly popular between 1890 and 1910 .
It became known , depending on the European country , by different names : Jugendstil in Germany and Scandinavia , Stile Liberty in Italy , Modernismo in Spain , Nieuwe Kunst in the Netherlands , Secession in Austria-Hungary , Szecesszió in Hungary , Arte Nova in Portugal , Modern in Russia , and curiously enough , Tiffany Style in the United States , etc .
In Britain it was initially known as Modern Style ( not to be confused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Modern architecture ” ) though nowadays the French denomination is the one commonly used .
The style was a reaction against the academic art , eclecticism and historicism of 19th century architecture and decoration .
It was often inspired by natural forms such as the sinuous curves of plants and flowers depicted with a sense of dynamism and movement .
By 1914 , with the beginning of WWI , Art Nouveau became somewhat passé , giving way in the 1920s to what became the dominant architectural and decorative art style known as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way to “ Modernism ” as we know it .
In spite of this , Art Nouveau survived throughout the 20th Century up to this day .
This artistic style spread all over the Continent ( and beyond ) and was adopted by many artists regardless of their political views .
So much so that Franz Stassen was still using such graphic motives during the Reich .
Also Fidus showed very strong Art Nouveau leanings in his work .
It is well-known that Art Nouveau was “ resurrected ” during the so-called “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I suppose as part of the “ Archaic Revival ” agenda… but that is another story .
In more recent times , to name a few examples , the works of people such as Jim Fitzpatrick , Roger Dean and Jonathon Earl Bowser show a not-so-distant Art Nouveau influence as well ( but that is open to debate ) .
As for the French artist that I am presenting is concerned I leave his biography here , extracted from the only source I have found available online ( i.e .
wikipedia ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friends in the political arena ( which brought him some problems with the authorities of the time plus two temporary exiles from his country ) , but his artistic Alfons Mucha ’ s inspired output was pretty much impressive as the picture-gallery below clearly shows .
Louis Théophile Hingre ( also known as Théophile Hingre ) was a French painter , sculptor , engraver , illustrator and poster artist .
He was born on 19 November 1832 in Écouen , where he also died , in 1911 .
His specialty was sculptures of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was apprenticed in Paris to the studio of Henri Louis Gervais and Adrien Possot to learn the ornamental sculpture and manufacture of bronzes .
His apprenticeship continued until he was 25 .
In 1851 , at the age of 19 , he married Louise Dailly .
They would go on to have four children , Maximilien , Clémentine , Marguerite and finally Leon , who would also go on to be a painter , forging his career in England .
During Hingre ’ s career , he was a respected member of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the artistic jury of his department ( d ’ État de la Seine ) from 1896 till 1906 , an officer of the Academy of Arts from 1899 and a public teacher of the arts from 1908 .
A republican by political orientation , he was close to Louis Blanc , having met him during the 1848 revolution .
He made sculptures for republican banquets , photographs of which remain , although the works themselves are lost .
Because of his political activism , Hingre twice had to flee to England , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1858 .
While in England , he worked in Birmingham as the ornamental sculptor of Elkington & Co .
It was during this employment that he first began to sculpt animals .
His first works were horse racing trophies .
He first exhibited at the Salon in 1860 , despite his British exile .
He continued to work for Elkington & Co until he returned to France .
In 1869 , after his return to France , he lived in Paris .
There he regularly took part in the competitions of the ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exhibited almost yearly at the Salon until he was 78 .
He presented 45 works in the years 1860 to 1910 .
He was also a member of many goldsmiths organisations .
He won a gold medal at the 1878 International Workers Collective Exhibition , and collaborated on works that obtained medals at the 1878 and 1890 Universal Expositions .
His admiration for Alfons Mucha , and his reputation as a poster artist , led to him being hired to produce Art Nouveau style posters for the Violet perfume house .
At the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12 November 1911 at the house of his daughter Clémentine in Écouen .
A street in Écouen is named for him .
An example of Hingre ’ s work can be found at the Victoria and Albert Museum , where a poster he designed for Theophile Roederer champagne can be seen .
Last month , April 20th , I released my new album entitled “ Music Against Time ” .
You can check it out HERE if interested .
Available to listen for free .

Art Nouveau never died
Art Nouveau was an artistic decorative style for architecture and applied arts which was mostly popular between 1890 and 1910. It became known, depending on the European country, by different names: Jugendstil in Germany and Scandinavia, Stile Liberty in Italy, Modernismo in Spain, Nieuwe Kunst in the Netherlands, Secession in Austria-Hungary, Szecesszió in Hungary, Arte Nova in Portugal, Modern in Russia, and curiously enough, Tiffany Style in the United States, etc. In Britain it was initially known as Modern Style (not to be confused with “Modernism” and its spawn “Modern architecture”) though nowadays the French denomination is the one commonly used. The style was a reaction against the academic art, eclecticism and historicism of 19th century architecture and decoration. It was often inspired by natural forms such as the sinuous curves of plants and flowers depicted with a sense of dynamism and movement.
By 1914, with the beginning of WWI, Art Nouveau became somewhat passé, giving way in the 1920s to what became the dominant architectural and decorative art style known as Art Deco, which likewise, gave way to “Modernism” as we know it.
In spite of this, Art Nouveau survived throughout the 20th Century up to this day. This artistic style spread all over the Continent (and beyond) and was adopted by many artists regardless of their political views. So much so that Franz Stassen was still using such graphic motives during the Reich. Also Fidus showed very strong Art Nouveau leanings in his work. It is well-known that Art Nouveau was “resurrected” during the so-called “counter-cultural era” of the late 1960s, I suppose as part of the “Archaic Revival” agenda… but that is another story.
In more recent times, to name a few examples, the works of people such as Jim Fitzpatrick, Roger Dean and Jonathon Earl Bowser show a not-so-distant Art Nouveau influence as well (but that is open to debate).
As for the French artist that I am presenting is concerned I leave his biography here, extracted from the only source I have found available online (i.e. wikipedia). Hingre seemed to have some dubious friends in the political arena (which brought him some problems with the authorities of the time plus two temporary exiles from his country), but his artistic Alfons Mucha’s inspired output was pretty much impressive as the picture-gallery below clearly shows.
Biography
Louis Théophile Hingre (also known as Théophile Hingre) was a French painter, sculptor, engraver, illustrator and poster artist. He was born on 19 November 1832 in Écouen, where he also died, in 1911. His specialty was sculptures of animals.
At the age of 12 he was apprenticed in Paris to the studio of Henri Louis Gervais and Adrien Possot to learn the ornamental sculpture and manufacture of bronzes. His apprenticeship continued until he was 25. In 1851, at the age of 19, he married Louise Dailly. They would go on to have four children, Maximilien, Clémentine, Marguerite and finally Leon, who would also go on to be a painter, forging his career in England.
During Hingre’s career, he was a respected member of artistic society, he was a member of the artistic jury of his department (d’État de la Seine) from 1896 till 1906, an officer of the Academy of Arts from 1899 and a public teacher of the arts from 1908. A republican by political orientation, he was close to Louis Blanc, having met him during the 1848 revolution. He made sculptures for republican banquets, photographs of which remain, although the works themselves are lost.
Because of his political activism, Hingre twice had to flee to England, once in 1848, and once in 1858. While in England, he worked in Birmingham as the ornamental sculptor of Elkington & Co. It was during this employment that he first began to sculpt animals. His first works were horse racing trophies. He first exhibited at the Salon in 1860, despite his British exile. He continued to work for Elkington & Co until he returned to France. In 1869, after his return to France, he lived in Paris. There he regularly took part in the competitions of the ‘Union centrale des arts décoratifs’ and exhibited almost yearly at the Salon until he was 78. He presented 45 works in the years 1860 to 1910. He was also a member of many goldsmiths organisations. He won a gold medal at the 1878 International Workers Collective Exhibition, and collaborated on works that obtained medals at the 1878 and 1890 Universal Expositions.
His admiration for Alfons Mucha, and his reputation as a poster artist, led to him being hired to produce Art Nouveau style posters for the Violet perfume house. At the age of 79, he died on 12 November 1911 at the house of his daughter Clémentine in Écouen. A street in Écouen is named for him.
An example of Hingre’s work can be found at the Victoria and Albert Museum, where a poster he designed for Theophile Roederer champagne can be seen.
Illustrations and graphics
'Magasin de Papiers Peints Charpentier-Deny' advertisement (1890) 'Parfumerie Violet' advertisement (1900) 'Champagne Theophile Roederer & Company' advertisement (1897) 'Encres D'Imprimere - La Flèche Bréham' advertisement by Louis Théophile Hingre 'Breger & Javal' advertisement (1900) 'Chocolat Carpentier Confiserie Universelle' advertisement by Louis Théophile Hingre 'Breger & Javal Gravers et Imprimevrs' advertisement (1899) 'Catalogue Pochette Couesnon & Company' advertisement 'Pallas Athena' by Louis Théophile Hingre 'Amor, Poema Original de Salvador Carrera' poster by Louis-Théophile Hingre 'Nouvelles Galeries' add by Louis Théophile Hingre 'Théophile Roederer & Cº Maison Fondée en 1864 Champagne' advertisement by Louis Théophile Hingre 'The Anunciation' (study) by Louis Théophile Hingre 'Papier et Cigarettes advertisement' by Louis Théophile Hingre 'Encres Antoine advertisement' by Louis Théophile Hingre Poster for Omega Bicycles, Henri Thiriet (1897) 'Pneu Velo Michelin' (1911) 'Vögel und Blumen' by Louis Théophile Hingre
Sculptures
'Seated Cat' by Louis Théophile Hingre 'Cockerel' sculpture by Louis Theophile Hingre
Last month, April 20th, I released my new album entitled “Music Against Time”. You can check it out HERE if interested. Available to listen for free.
Share now!
Author: J. Belenger J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. Twitter Facebook