renegadetribune--2020-09-16--Ditlieb Felderer Explains Auschwitz

Ditlieb Felderer Explains Auschwitz

Ditlieb Felderer , 46 , first met Zündel in 1979 .
Both had an interest in what Felderer defined as the “ extermination theory , ” the belief that during the Second World War , in Poland , millions of people had been exterminated in gas chambers .
( 18-4225 ) Felderer ’ s interest in the subject had been aroused during his years as a researcher for the Jehovah ’ s Witness publication Awake !
, during which time he prepared a research paper for the Witnesses ’ governing body on the history of the Jehovah ’ s Witnesses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the sect were incarcerated in virtually every camp in Nazi Germany during the war and also in such countries as Canada because they refused to bear arms .
( 18-4225 to 4229 ) In the beginning , the Jehovah ’ s Witnesses claimed that 60,000 of their members were killed in the Nazi concentration camps .
Felderer ’ s research on the question , which took him to the headquarters of the Jehovah ’ s Witnesses in New York , as well as to archives in Toronto , Switzerland and Scandinavian countries , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far lower , and that only about 200 Jehovah ’ s Witnesses were killed .
Felderer ’ s research put him on a collision course with the sect ; the leadership in New York warned members that they were not allowed to speak to him .
In a subsequent Yearbook published by the Jehovah ’ s Witnesses , however , they conceded that only 203 people were killed during the war .
Felderer had told Zündel about this research .
( 18-4226 to 4229 ; 4645 ) In 1976 , Felderer received an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Six Million Really Die ?
by Richard Harwood from an anonymous sender .
Felderer , who was Swedish , could also read Danish , Norwegian , German , French and English .
As a result of reading the booklet , he decided to delve into the issue and visit all of the camps that he possibly could .
( 18-4230 , 4231 ) Felderer subsequently published a Swedish language edition of Did Six Million Really Die ?
in 1977 .
Under Swedish law , he was required to submit the booklet to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had a special department where publications were scanned to determine whether they were lawful .
No complaint or prosecution was ever brought against Felderer for the booklet .
It was mailed to all major newspapers in Sweden and schools and was still available in Sweden today .
( 18-4233 ) In total , he distributed about 10,000 copies in Swedish .
( 19-4620 ; Dog Verkligen Sex Miljoner ?
entered as Exhibit 74 , 18-4231 ) Felderer had never found anything substantially wrong with Did Six Million Really Die ?
.
He testified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had proven to be more true as the years progressed .
In 1974 , when the booklet was first published , it was believed there was a Hitler order .
Did Six Million Really Die ?
was the first publication Felderer saw which claimed otherwise .
The exterminationists had now moved to a position closer to that of the booklet .
( 19-4601 )

From CODOH
Ditlieb Felderer, 46, first met Zündel in 1979. Both had an interest in what Felderer defined as the “extermination theory,” the belief that during the Second World War, in Poland, millions of people had been exterminated in gas chambers. (18-4225)
Felderer’s interest in the subject had been aroused during his years as a researcher for the Jehovah’s Witness publication Awake!, during which time he prepared a research paper for the Witnesses’ governing body on the history of the Jehovah’s Witnesses during World War II. Members of the sect were incarcerated in virtually every camp in Nazi Germany during the war and also in such countries as Canada because they refused to bear arms. (18-4225 to 4229) In the beginning, the Jehovah’s Witnesses claimed that 60,000 of their members were killed in the Nazi concentration camps. Felderer’s research on the question, which took him to the headquarters of the Jehovah’s Witnesses in New York, as well as to archives in Toronto, Switzerland and Scandinavian countries, convinced him that the actual number was far lower, and that only about 200 Jehovah’s Witnesses were killed. Felderer’s research put him on a collision course with the sect; the leadership in New York warned members that they were not allowed to speak to him. In a subsequent Yearbook published by the Jehovah’s Witnesses, however, they conceded that only 203 people were killed during the war. Felderer had told Zündel about this research. (18-4226 to 4229; 4645)
In 1976, Felderer received an English language edition of the booklet Did Six Million Really Die? by Richard Harwood from an anonymous sender. Felderer, who was Swedish, could also read Danish, Norwegian, German, French and English. As a result of reading the booklet, he decided to delve into the issue and visit all of the camps that he possibly could. (18-4230, 4231)
Felderer subsequently published a Swedish language edition of Did Six Million Really Die? in 1977. Under Swedish law, he was required to submit the booklet to the Attorney General’s department, which had a special department where publications were scanned to determine whether they were lawful. No complaint or prosecution was ever brought against Felderer for the booklet. It was mailed to all major newspapers in Sweden and schools and was still available in Sweden today. (18-4233) In total, he distributed about 10,000 copies in Swedish. (19-4620; Dog Verkligen Sex Miljoner? entered as Exhibit 74, 18-4231)
Felderer had never found anything substantially wrong with Did Six Million Really Die?. He testified that, to the contrary, it had proven to be more true as the years progressed. In 1974, when the booklet was first published, it was believed there was a Hitler order. Did Six Million Really Die? was the first publication Felderer saw which claimed otherwise. The exterminationists had now moved to a position closer to that of the booklet. (19-4601)
Bitchute link


renegadetribune--2020-09-16--37% of Measles Cases Analyzed In The US In 2015 Were Caused By The MMR Vaccine

What Happened : A study published in 2017 in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology found that “ During the measles outbreak in California in 2015 , a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees .
Of the 194 measles sequences obtained in the United States in 2015 , 73 were identified as vaccine sequences… ” The authors developed a test that can identify measles vaccine strains rapidly in order to do this .
Why This Is Important : It ’ s important because this study begs the question , how often are measles outbreaks that cause quite a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coverage actually a result of the MMR vaccine itself ?
How often are people in these measles outbreaks analyzed and tested to determine whether they have contracted a wild type measles , or a vaccine strain measles ?
As far as I know there are no studies that have done this accept the one listed above that analyzed a 2015 outbreak .
It ’ s quite common that measles outbreak are largely blamed on the unvaccinated , and the well documented failure of the measles vaccine is never really mentioned nor known about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recommend them .
The failure of the measles vaccine has been well documented over the years .
As far back as 1994 , a paper published in JAME Internal Medicine titled “ Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination : Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons ” was one of many to highlight this point .
At the time of this study , only one measles vaccine was in circulation and as a result of its documented failure , federal health regulatory introduced a second dose requirement for children .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there are a number of examples .
The fact remains that we ’ ve seen measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations which begs the question , is the vaccine even effective ?
Does it even work ?
Are the antibodies that the vaccine provides children sufficient enough to prevent your child from contracting the measles ?
We already know that many healthy people do not respond to routine vaccinations ?
They are known as non-responders .
Up to 10 percent of healthy individuals fail to mount antibody levels to routine vaccines… ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Immunotherapeutics highlights this point .
This means in the United States , for 32,800,000 vaccines will simply not work .
Another study published in the highly authoritative Bulletin of the World Health Organization looked at recent measles occurrences throughout China and found that there were 707 measles outbreaks in the country recorded between 2009 and 2012 , with a steep upward trend in 2013 .
“ The number of measles cases reported in the first 10 months of 2013 – 26 443 – was three times the number reported in the whole of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since 2009 “ …the first dose of measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90 % of the target population.
” One would expect that with an increasing number of measles vaccinations there would be a decrease in measles occurrences .
Another example comes from a 2017 measles outbreak in vaccinated individuals in Israel—reported on by the CDC—where all but one patient had laboratory evidence of a “ previous immune response ” ( secondary vaccine failure ) , and the one patient who did not display such evidence reported having received two doses of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In addition , the index patient—the one who launched the chain of transmission—had received three doses of the measles-containing vaccine .
A study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases – whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization , New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene , the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases , and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) , Atlanta , GA – looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak , which showed that individuals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it ( secondary transmission ) .
The study concluded that “ measles may occur in vaccinated individuals , but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented.
” ( source ) If we go back in history a little bit : Barratta et al .
( 1970 ) investigated an outbreak in Florida from December 1968 to February 1969 and found little difference in the incidence of measles in vaccinated and unvaccinated children .
( source ) Robertson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that in 1985 and 1986 , 152 measles outbreaks in US school-age children occurred among persons who had previously received the measles vaccine .
“ Every 2-3 years , there is an upsurge of measles irrespective of vaccination compliance.
” ( source ) In 2010 , there were a number of children in Croatia who had contracted measles that were fully vaccinated ( source ) .
The interesting thing about this case was the fact that not only had they become infected with measles from the vaccine strain , rather than the normal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were also contagious .
According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987 , “ An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi , Texas , in the spring of 1985 , even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.
” They concluded that “ outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools , even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.
” ( source ) An article published in the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures , ” looked into an outbreak of 137 cases of measles in Montana .
School records indicated that 98.7 % of students were appropriately vaccinated , leading the researchers to conclude : “ This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.
” ( source ) Furthermore , let ’ s not forget that hundreds of children have died from the measles vaccine .
According to a MedAlerts search of the FDA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) database as of 2/5/19 , the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles , mumps , and rubella vaccines alone was : 93,929 adverse events , 1,810 disabilities , 6,902 hospitalizations , and 463 deaths .
What is even more disturbing about these numbers is that VAERS is a voluntary and passive reporting system that has been found to only capture 1 % of adverse events .
Another point to make regarding vaccine injury is that data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients , and 1.4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) were given to 376,452 individuals .
Of these doses , 35,570 possible reactions ( 2.6 percent of vaccinations ) were identified .
This is an average of 890 possible events , an average of 1.3 events per clinician , per month .
This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference .
This data comes 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research ( AHCR ) that found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury , a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that report and read more about it here .
Is The Vaccine More Dangerous Than The Measles ?
A Just Question : The Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) are a group of doctors and scientists from around the world who have come together to support informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures .
Their information is based on science .
Their mission is to deliver data on infectious diseases and vaccines , and to unite doctors , scientists , healthcare professionals , attorneys , and families who support voluntary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the public are able to evaluate the data on infectious diseases and vaccines objectively and voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination .
You can check out their directors , advisors , and founding members here .
On their website , they ’ ve put out some excellent downloadable PDF ’ s with regards to the MMR vaccine .
There are four of them that all present different points .
• MEASLES : What Parents Need To Know • MMR VACCINE : Is It Safer Than Measles ?
One of them deals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the measles vaccine ” and another one presents the information that has them questioning if the MMR vaccine is safer than the measles .
They point out that the chances of dying from measles and make many comparisons to the vaccine .
The PDF ’ s are well-sourced and laid out in an easy to read and understand type of manner , and quite detailed .
Their arguments are quite compelling , and it would be interesting to present this information to a physician on the opposite end of the spectrum in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So feel free to take a look at them if interested !
Below is the testimony of Dr. Brian Hooker , a long time biochemical engineer who has been researching this topic and publishing multiple peer-reviewed papers on it for decades.In the video , he drops some facts a lot of people simply don ’ t know because they are never acknowledged in the mainstream .
Even those who support mass vaccinations are usually completely unaware of these facts .
It was given at a public hearing in Washington State opposing mandatory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are quite a controversial topic , and vaccine hesitancy continues to increase among not only the global citizenry , but among doctors and physicians as well , which was also expressed at the recent World Health Organization vaccine summit .
You can read more about that here .
In today ’ s day and age , it ’ s important to ask ourselves if measures taken under the guise of goodwill are really necessary and good for us .
Take terrorism , for example , the idea that those who fund the problem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some cases create the problem then propose the solution of foreign infiltration , again , under the guise of goodwill .
So what were the real intentions , to stop the terrorists or to take over the country for natural resources and economic power and control ?
Are people capitalizing off of the coronavirus ?
Not just for profit but for control , like Edward Snowden mentioned ?
It ’ s also important to note that pharmaceutical companies hold tremendous lobbying power , even more so than big oil .
( source ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the right to decide for ourselves what goes into our body ?
Especially when there is a tremendous amount of flawed logic with the idea of mass vaccinations ?
Should we not have access to appropriate double blind placebo controlled safety studies ?
How come there are none for vaccines ?
Why are there massive ridicule campaigns against organizations , professionals and people who create awareness about vaccine safety ?
Is vaccine safety not in the best interests of everybody ?
Should we not be analyzing and questioning instead of simply believing ?
@ @ @

By
What Happened: A study published in 2017 in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology found that “During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees. Of the 194 measles sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences…” The authors developed a test that can identify measles vaccine strains rapidly in order to do this.
The new assay was able to detect RNA from five currently used vaccine strains, AIK-C, CAM-70, Edmonston-Zagreb, Moraten, and Shanghai-191. The MeVA RT-qPCR assay has been used successfully for measles surveillance in reference laboratories, and it could be readily deployed to national and subnational laboratories on a wide scale.
Why This Is Important: It’s important because this study begs the question, how often are measles outbreaks that cause quite a stir as a result of mainstream media coverage actually a result of the MMR vaccine itself? How often are people in these measles outbreaks analyzed and tested to determine whether they have contracted a wild type measles, or a vaccine strain measles? As far as I know there are no studies that have done this accept the one listed above that analyzed a 2015 outbreak. It’s quite common that measles outbreak are largely blamed on the unvaccinated, and the well documented failure of the measles vaccine is never really mentioned nor known about by the general public or doctors who recommend them.
The failure of the measles vaccine has been well documented over the years. As far back as 1994, a paper published in JAME Internal Medicine titled “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons” was one of many to highlight this point.
The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons. Because of the failure rate of the vaccine and the unique transmissibility of the measles virus, the currently available measles vaccine, used in a single-dose strategy, is unlikely to completely eliminate measles.
At the time of this study, only one measles vaccine was in circulation and as a result of its documented failure, federal health regulatory introduced a second dose requirement for children. This measure has also shown little success, there are a number of examples. The fact remains that we’ve seen measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations which begs the question, is the vaccine even effective? Does it even work? Are the antibodies that the vaccine provides children sufficient enough to prevent your child from contracting the measles?
We already know that many healthy people do not respond to routine vaccinations? They are known as non-responders. Up to 10 percent of healthy individuals fail to mount antibody levels to routine vaccines…” A study published in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics highlights this point.
While inadequacies of the vaccine (such as incomplete attenuation, incorrect immunisation route or schedule, or failures in delivery due to interruption of the cold chain) are reasons for vaccine failures that can be logistically overcome, host-related factors for non-responsiveness (associated with the immune and health status, age, or genetic factors) are more difficult to define and underlying mechanisms of vaccine failure are largely unexamined or unknown.”
This means in the United States, for 32,800,000 vaccines will simply not work.
While inadequacies of the vaccine (such as incomplete attenuation, incorrect immunisation route or schedule, or failures in delivery due to interruption of the cold chain) are reasons for vaccine failures that can be logistically overcome, host-related factors for non-responsiveness (associated with the immune and health status, age, or genetic factors) are more difficult to define and underlying mechanisms of vaccine failure are largely unexamined or unknown.”
Another study published in the highly authoritative Bulletin of the World Health Organization looked at recent measles occurrences throughout China and found that there were 707 measles outbreaks in the country recorded between 2009 and 2012, with a steep upward trend in 2013. “The number of measles cases reported in the first 10 months of 2013 – 26 443 – was three times the number reported in the whole of 2012.” This is odd considering that since 2009 “…the first dose of measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90% of the target population.” One would expect that with an increasing number of measles vaccinations there would be a decrease in measles occurrences.
Another example comes from a 2017 measles outbreak in vaccinated individuals in Israel—reported on by the CDC—where all but one patient had laboratory evidence of a “previous immune response” (secondary vaccine failure), and the one patient who did not display such evidence reported having received two doses of the vaccine (primary vaccine failure). In addition, the index patient—the one who launched the chain of transmission—had received three doses of the measles-containing vaccine.
A study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases – whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA – looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak, which showed that individuals with prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission). The study concluded that “measles may occur in vaccinated individuals, but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented.” (source)
“This is the first report of measles transmission from a twice vaccinated individual. The clinical presentation and laboratory data of the index were typical of measles in a naïve individual. Secondary cases had robust anamnestic antibody responses. No tertiary cases occurred despite numerous contacts. This outbreak underscores the need for thorough epidemiologic and laboratory investigation of suspected measles cases regardless of vaccination status.”
If we go back in history a little bit:
Barratta et al. (1970) investigated an outbreak in Florida from December 1968 to February 1969 and found little difference in the incidence of measles in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. (source)
Robertson et al. (1992) wrote that in 1985 and 1986, 152 measles outbreaks in US school-age children occurred among persons who had previously received the measles vaccine. “Every 2-3 years, there is an upsurge of measles irrespective of vaccination compliance.” (source)
In 2010, there were a number of children in Croatia who had contracted measles that were fully vaccinated (source). The interesting thing about this case was the fact that not only had they become infected with measles from the vaccine strain, rather than the normal “natural” strain, but they were also contagious.
According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, “An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.” They concluded that “outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.” (source)
An article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, “A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures,” looked into an outbreak of 137 cases of measles in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”(source)
Furthermore, let’s not forget that hundreds of children have died from the measles vaccine. According to a MedAlerts search of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. What is even more disturbing about these numbers is that VAERS is a voluntary and passive reporting system that has been found to only capture 1% of adverse events.
Another point to make regarding vaccine injury is that data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference. This data comes 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) that found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million. You can access that report and read more about it here.
Is The Vaccine More Dangerous Than The Measles? A Just Question: The Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) are a group of doctors and scientists from around the world who have come together to support informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures. Their information is based on science. Their mission is to deliver data on infectious diseases and vaccines, and to unite doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary vaccinations. Their vision is that doctors and the public are able to evaluate the data on infectious diseases and vaccines objectively and voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination.
You can check out their directors, advisors, and founding members here.
On their website, they’ve put out some excellent downloadable PDF’s with regards to the MMR vaccine. There are four of them that all present different points.
One of them deals with “what parents need to know about the measles vaccine” and another one presents the information that has them questioning if the MMR vaccine is safer than the measles. They point out that the chances of dying from measles and make many comparisons to the vaccine.
The PDF’s are well-sourced and laid out in an easy to read and understand type of manner, and quite detailed. Their arguments are quite compelling, and it would be interesting to present this information to a physician on the opposite end of the spectrum in order to hear or read their rebuttal. So feel free to take a look at them if interested!
Below is the testimony of Dr. Brian Hooker, a long time biochemical engineer who has been researching this topic and publishing multiple peer-reviewed papers on it for decades.In the video, he drops some facts a lot of people simply don’t know because they are never acknowledged in the mainstream. Even those who support mass vaccinations are usually completely unaware of these facts. It was given at a public hearing in Washington State opposing mandatory vaccination measures.
The Takeaway: Vaccinations are quite a controversial topic, and vaccine hesitancy continues to increase among not only the global citizenry, but among doctors and physicians as well, which was also expressed at the recent World Health Organization vaccine summit. You can read more about that here.
In today’s day and age, it’s important to ask ourselves if measures taken under the guise of goodwill are really necessary and good for us. Take terrorism, for example, the idea that those who fund the problem, arm the problem, and in some cases create the problem then propose the solution of foreign infiltration, again, under the guise of goodwill.
So what were the real intentions, to stop the terrorists or to take over the country for natural resources and economic power and control?
Are people capitalizing off of the coronavirus? Not just for profit but for control, like Edward Snowden mentioned?
It’s also important to note that pharmaceutical companies hold tremendous lobbying power, even more so than big oil. (source)
Ask yourself, should we not have the right to decide for ourselves what goes into our body? Especially when there is a tremendous amount of flawed logic with the idea of mass vaccinations? Should we not have access to appropriate double blind placebo controlled safety studies? How come there are none for vaccines?
Why are there massive ridicule campaigns against organizations, professionals and people who create awareness about vaccine safety? Is vaccine safety not in the best interests of everybody? Should we not be analyzing and questioning instead of simply believing? […]
This article originally appeared on Collective Evolution.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-09-18--University to Remove Murals from 1950s Because They Show Too Many White People

The University of Rhode Island has two folk-art murals that were painted in the 1950s by Dr. Arthur Sherman , an alumnus and veteran ( who would also teach at the university ) to honor those who had fought in the war from URI .
The murals depict students talking to each other and and traveling to campus in the era of the GI Bill .
These murals are in the school ’ s Memorial Union , but they are currently covered up and will soon be removed , all because some students did not “ feel comfortable ” sitting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ murals are “ predominately white , ” according to Kathy Collins , vice president of student affairs .
Collins cites the “ tragic murders ” of George Floyd , Breonna Taylor , and Jacob Blake as important reasons why the murals have to go .
I think we have to recognize the horrible incidents and the tragic murders of George Floyd , Breonna Taylor , and most recently Jacob Blake in Kenosha Wisconsin during this is heightened time and we as an institution have to look at the systems in place across this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we are today and representing the true diversity of URI today .
According to The College Fix , artist Arthur Sherman told CBS 12 that “ [ t ] ime goes by and things change , ” but his daughter , Pamela Sherman , does not seem as accepting of the change .
Pamela Sherman , his daughter , told CBS that university officials could preserve history while adding other artwork .
Pamela said the murals give URI an “ opportunity for them to capture a moment in time in their history ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the timeline of that history over the many generations.
” “ It ’ s an opportunity for the University of Rhode Island to embrace its history , it ’ s an opportunity for it to show a timeline , a progression and a change over decades and we never want to forget our past.
” Originally the University said that the murals could not be removed without damaging them and the walls , so they would be destroyed , but now URI says they are looking into ways of relocating them .
White @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now deemed unacceptable , since it makes some non-White feel uncomfortable .
It does not seem to matter if White people feel comfortable with having their history erased , their ancestors demonized , and their entire culture attacked on a daily basis .
Getting rid of murals that are “ too White ” is just one more aspect of White genocide , which has been accelerating at an alarming pace .
Tragically , if men like Sherman did not go to war to fight against “ the Nazis ” in WWII , ensuring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would not be in this position today .

The University of Rhode Island has two folk-art murals that were painted in the 1950s by Dr. Arthur Sherman, an alumnus and veteran (who would also teach at the university) to honor those who had fought in the war from URI. The murals depict students talking to each other and and traveling to campus in the era of the GI Bill. These murals are in the school’s Memorial Union, but they are currently covered up and will soon be removed, all because some students did not “feel comfortable” sitting near them because the people in the murals are “predominately white,” according to Kathy Collins, vice president of student affairs.
Collins cites the “tragic murders” of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Jacob Blake as important reasons why the murals have to go.
I think we have to recognize the horrible incidents and the tragic murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and most recently Jacob Blake in Kenosha Wisconsin during this is heightened time and we as an institution have to look at the systems in place across this institution that maybe are not representing who we are today and representing the true diversity of URI today.
According to The College Fix, artist Arthur Sherman told CBS 12 that “[t]ime goes by and things change,” but his daughter, Pamela Sherman, does not seem as accepting of the change.
Pamela Sherman, his daughter, told CBS that university officials could preserve history while adding other artwork. Pamela said the murals give URI an “opportunity for them to capture a moment in time in their history” and said the school should “maintain the timeline of that history over the many generations.” “It’s an opportunity for the University of Rhode Island to embrace its history, it’s an opportunity for it to show a timeline, a progression and a change over decades and we never want to forget our past.”
Originally the University said that the murals could not be removed without damaging them and the walls, so they would be destroyed, but now URI says they are looking into ways of relocating them.
White people even existing in historical paintings is now deemed unacceptable, since it makes some non-White feel uncomfortable. It does not seem to matter if White people feel comfortable with having their history erased, their ancestors demonized, and their entire culture attacked on a daily basis. Getting rid of murals that are “too White” is just one more aspect of White genocide, which has been accelerating at an alarming pace.
Tragically, if men like Sherman did not go to war to fight against “the Nazis” in WWII, ensuring the victory of world jewry, we would not be in this position today.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-09-18--Matterhorn Through The Mist: The Art of Felix Heuberger

Described by Swiss anatomist , physiologist and poet Albrecht von Haller ( 1732-1777 ) as ‘ an area of mythical purity ’ The Alps , with its amazing mountainous landscapes and lakes , have been a great inspiration for many artists over the centuries .
Adolf Hitler ( a painter himself ) had a lifelong romantic fascination with the Alps and by the 1930s established a home at Berghof , in the Obersalzberg region outside of Berchtesgaden .
One of the aforementioned artists was precisely Hitler ’ s Austrian fellow-countryman Felix Heuberger .
Felix Heuberger was a landscape painter whose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ magic realistic atmosphere .
Heuberger went through both world wars in Europe as a combatant .
He became a POW at the end of WWII , which did not prevent him from being able to return to his passion of landscape-painting soon after being released .
There is very little information about Heuberger available in English , so the sources I have used for the biography next come almost exclusively from German-speaking sites .
I hope you enjoy Felix Heuberger ’ s landscape paintings as much as I have enjoyed myself putting them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as per usual , will be welcomed .
Felix Heuberger ( March 7 , 1888 in Vienna – January 25 , 1968 in Hall in Tirol ) , also known by the full name of Felix Christof Stefan Heuberger , was an Austrian painter , etcher and engineer .
Felix Heuberger was born as the second son of the Austrian composer and music writer Richard Heuberger and his wife Johanna Herr .
His two siblings were the older brother Richard and the younger Grete .
Felix Heuberger ’ s became known as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ included landscapes with mountains , forests and lakes , often characterized by beautiful and atmospheric light .
Heuberger attended the Academic Gymnasium in Vienna after a carefree childhood .
He reported that “ he could not make friends with the language of Pericles ” , and so he moved to secondary school ; this marked the way to technical university .
He graduated with a civil engineering diploma in 1914 .
Soon after the outbreak of the First World War , he joined the Third Dragoon Regiment ( Dritten Dragoner-Regiment ) as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rider , he got to know the beauty of the Galician and Northern Italian plains during the war years after he had spent his childhood and youth in the Salzkammergut and the Tyrolean mountains during the summer season with his parents .
This laid the foundation for his deep love of nature .
During his studies at the Technical University in Vienna he met his future wife Christine Clanner von Engelshofen , whom he married shortly before the end of the First World War .
He experienced this as a cavalry officer on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the end of the war , the newly married man with his pronounced artistic ambitions -music also played a major role in his life- was faced with a difficult time choosing a career .
Felix Heuberger became known through the exhibition of his paintings in the Vienna Kunstlerhaus in 1919 , where he received excellent reviews .
Heuberger ’ s landscapes were shown in over twenty exhibitions in Austria , Germany , England and America .
After the Second World War , in which he took part as a reserve officer , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and created many beautiful pictures , some of which were inspired by southern landscape experiences .
Good graphic works , especially etchings and several portraits , are also part of his oeuvre .
But he was always most fascinated by the mood in the landscape : light and shadow , fog and clouds , the air that can be felt in contrast between foreground and background that so few artists can make tangible .
At the height of his career , on January 25 , 1968 , a sudden death took the brush @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few weeks before his 80th birthday .
The fact that he had succeeded in conjuring up the landscape of many people ’ s daily lives with his pictures became the best reward for his work .

Described by Swiss anatomist, physiologist and poet Albrecht von Haller (1732-1777) as ‘an area of mythical purity’ The Alps, with its amazing mountainous landscapes and lakes, have been a great inspiration for many artists over the centuries. Adolf Hitler (a painter himself) had a lifelong romantic fascination with the Alps and by the 1930s established a home at Berghof, in the Obersalzberg region outside of Berchtesgaden. One of the aforementioned artists was precisely Hitler’s Austrian fellow-countryman Felix Heuberger.
Felix Heuberger was a landscape painter whose pictures seemed to capture some kind of magic realistic atmosphere. Heuberger went through both world wars in Europe as a combatant. He became a POW at the end of WWII, which did not prevent him from being able to return to his passion of landscape-painting soon after being released. There is very little information about Heuberger available in English, so the sources I have used for the biography next come almost exclusively from German-speaking sites.
I hope you enjoy Felix Heuberger’s landscape paintings as much as I have enjoyed myself putting them together for the gallery below. Comments, as per usual, will be welcomed.
Biography
Felix Heuberger (March 7, 1888 in Vienna – January 25, 1968 in Hall in Tirol), also known by the full name of Felix Christof Stefan Heuberger, was an Austrian painter, etcher and engineer. Felix Heuberger was born as the second son of the Austrian composer and music writer Richard Heuberger and his wife Johanna Herr. His two siblings were the older brother Richard and the younger Grete. Felix Heuberger’s became known as a painter for his favoured subjects which included landscapes with mountains, forests and lakes, often characterized by beautiful and atmospheric light.
Heuberger attended the Academic Gymnasium in Vienna after a carefree childhood. He reported that “he could not make friends with the language of Pericles”, and so he moved to secondary school; this marked the way to technical university. He graduated with a civil engineering diploma in 1914. Soon after the outbreak of the First World War, he joined the Third Dragoon Regiment (Dritten Dragoner-Regiment) as a volunteer. As an officer and enthusiastic rider, he got to know the beauty of the Galician and Northern Italian plains during the war years after he had spent his childhood and youth in the Salzkammergut and the Tyrolean mountains during the summer season with his parents. This laid the foundation for his deep love of nature.
During his studies at the Technical University in Vienna he met his future wife Christine Clanner von Engelshofen, whom he married shortly before the end of the First World War. He experienced this as a cavalry officer on the southern and eastern fronts. At the end of the war, the newly married man with his pronounced artistic ambitions -music also played a major role in his life- was faced with a difficult time choosing a career.
As a painter Heuberger soon found his own personal style, which he described as “timelessly romantic”. For him, the mood of every landscape was essential since this is subject to constant change depending on the light.
Felix Heuberger became known through the exhibition of his paintings in the Vienna Kunstlerhaus in 1919, where he received excellent reviews. Heuberger’s landscapes were shown in over twenty exhibitions in Austria, Germany, England and America.
After the Second World War, in which he took part as a reserve officer, he returned from captivity to his work again and created many beautiful pictures, some of which were inspired by southern landscape experiences. Good graphic works, especially etchings and several portraits, are also part of his oeuvre. But he was always most fascinated by the mood in the landscape: light and shadow, fog and clouds, the air that can be felt in contrast between foreground and background that so few artists can make tangible.
At the height of his career, on January 25, 1968, a sudden death took the brush from Heuberger’s hand, just a few weeks before his 80th birthday. The fact that he had succeeded in conjuring up the landscape of many people’s daily lives with his pictures became the best reward for his work.
Sources: Arnot Gallery, Wikipedia (Deustch), Le Prince Lointain, and AlpinWiki (‘Der Bergsteiger’ 1973, volume 5, page 295).
Donate
'Abendstimmung Am See' (1930) by Felix Heuberger 'Ake In The Moonlight' (1930) by Felix Heuberger 'Berglandschaft An Einem See' by Felix Heuberger 'Blick Aufs Karwendelgebirge Um' (1930) by Felix Heuberger 'Bodenstein-Eibsee' (1928) by Felix Heuberger 'Der Schwarzsee Beim Wilden Kaiser' by Felix Heuberger 'In The Dolomites (Torre Di Brenta)' (1925) by Felix Heuberger 'Kalkkögel' (1931) by Felix Heuberger 'Kellerjoch Im Winter' (1935) by Felix Heuberger 'Larches In The Mist' by Felix Heuberger 'Larches In The Morning Light' by Felix Heuberger 'Meadow In Summer With Clouds Rising Behind The Peaks' by Felix Heuberger 'Morning On The Fuschl Lake' by Felix Heuberger 'Morning On The Fuschl Lake' by Felix Heuberger 'Mountains With Snowflakes' by Felix Heuberger 'Rising Mists (Matterhorn)' by Felix Heuberger 'The Lienz Dolomites From The East' (1930) by Felix Heuberger 'The Matterhorn' by Felix Heuberger 'The Rising Mists' by Felix Heuberger 'View Of Hohensalzburg Castle' by Felix Heuberger 'View of Klosterneuburg' (1934) by Felix Heuberger 'Schlossansicht Im Winter' by Felix Heuberger 'Winter Landscape' (1935) by Felix Heuberger
Share now!
Author: J. Belenger J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. Twitter Facebook


renegadetribune--2020-09-18--The Myth of Hitler’s “Jewish Grandfather”

The more enormous and preposterous a lie is , the quicker it captures the public ’ s imagination and is believed , and the harder it is to dispel .
It is one of the cruel ironies of history , though perhaps not an unexpected one , that having exposed and denounced the technique of the Big Lie to the world , Adolf Hitler himself became the subject of a whole slew of falsehoods and calumnies .
It is not our purpose here to investigate all of the Big Lies which have been propagated about Adolf Hitler , National Socialism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to focus on one of the most long-lived and pernicious of these lies : that Hitler was of partially Jewish ancestry .
There are a number of variations of the “ Hitler was part Jewish ” myth , which generally have two things in common : Most are based on the accusation that Hitler ’ s paternal grandfather was a Jew , and all are thoroughly discredited by the available documentary evidence .
That this charge is still repeated today is a testament to the enduring and burning hatred , which Adolf Hitler @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , even now , decades after his death .
At the same time , it is a classic example of the contempt for the truth which many anti-Hitler System historians display when discussing the National Socialist Era in Europe .
In point of fact , the Hitler family , including Adolf Hitler ’ s paternal grandfather , is one of unimpeachable Aryan lineage .
Through the records of births , deaths and marriages kept by the Roman Catholic Church , it is possible to trace Hitler ’ s forebears back hundreds of years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time immemorial in Upper Austria , was of solid German peasant stock , and Hitler ’ s immediate ancestors were all either small farmers or craftsmen .
( The notable exception to this , of course , was Hitler ’ s father , Alois Hitler , who was a commissioned official in the Austrian customs service . )
The spelling and pronunciation of the family name as “ Hitler ” is a fairly recent development .
Older versions include “ Huettler ” and “ Hiedler , ” the former being the original family @ @ @ @ @ @ @ derived .
[ 2 ] The sole irregularity in Hitler ’ s ancestry was the illegitimacy of his father .
Because he was born out of wedlock , Alois Hitler bore the maiden name of his mother , Maria Anna Schicklgruber , for a good portion of his life .
Even after his mother finally married his father , Johann Georg Hiedler , Alois retained the name Schicklgruber .
Not until he was 39 years old , did he reclaim his proper family name , which he spelled and pronounced in the manner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Hitler .
[ 3 ] Yet this illegitimacy in itself is not significant or even unusual .
As the anti-NS historian Bradley F. Smith notes in his well-researched and generally impartial book Adolf Hitler : His Family , Childhood and Youth [ 1967 ] : Unusual or not , the illegitimacy of Alois has served as a crucial factual base for those who seek to spread the falsehood that Hitler had a Jewish grandfather .
As anyone who has firsthand experience in the racialist movement knows , it is common practice for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to discredit up-and-coming anti-Jewish personalities by spreading spurious rumors that this or that leader is really a Jew , or a homosexual , or a communist , or a government agent .
Indeed , with slanders of this sort even some individuals within the racialist movement will attempt to undercut their political rivals .
Adolf Hitler was the target of such underhanded , contemptible opposition from within the Movement at least as early as July of 1921 .
A clique of NSDAP members who evidently felt that Hitler was not suited to lead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he was of Jewish ancestry .
As is always the case in stories concerning Hitler ’ s allegedly Jewish ancestors , these conspirators had absolutely no documentary evidence for their claims , and relied instead on false innuendo , unfounded suspicions , and ill will .
Their efforts culminated in the circulation of a leaflet by NSDAP member Ernst Ehrensperger , which read in part : Although this may have been the first effort to smear Hitler in this manner , it certainly was not the last .
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a number of variations of this tale , including versions that were often mutually contradictory .
The London Daily Mirror futilely tried to add some substance to this lie in October 1933 by publishing a photograph of a tombstone of a Polish Jew who had borne the same name as Hitler ’ s .
Two Jewish newspapers , Forward in the United States and Haynt in Poland , quickly took it upon themselves to spread this particular story further , the implication being that the deceased Jew was Hitler ’ s grandfather .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ born in 1832 , he was only five years older than Hitler ’ s father , which meant that he couldn ’ t have been the man who sired the illegitimate Alois — unless the Jew in Poland sired the Fuhrer ’ s father in Austria at age five .
Thus , the first “ Jewish grandfather ” story was laid to rest .
[ 6 ] The infamous anti-National Socialist propagandist Konrad Heiden , himself part-Jewish , also suggested in his venomous biographies of Hitler , published in 1932 and 1936 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Although these books were highly regarded in circles hostile to the Movement , this one lie was correctly deemed too unlikely to be taken seriously and was generally dismissed .
[ 7 ] Strangely enough , the most persistent version of the myth was not widely publicized until 1956 , long after the Fuehrer ’ s death , with the publication of Franz Jetzinger ’ s Hitler ’ s Jugend : Phantasien , Luegen und die Wahrheit [ Hitler ’ s Youth : Fantasies , Lies and the Truth ] , Whereas previous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of being part Jewish simply took the form of wild rumors which were as devoid of documentation as they were detached from reality , Jetzinger at least made some effort to back up his case .
Although it most assuredly was not his purpose in once again raising the “ Jewish grandfather ” allegation , Jetzinger performed in this way a valuable service to our Movement , for his accusation spurred other researchers on to determine once and for all the truth or falsity of the myth.What these researchers found , of course @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The German historian and biographer of Adolf Hitler , Werner Maser , who is somewhat less hysterical in his opposition to National Socialism and its founder than other anti-NS writers , discovered that : In other words , it is simply impossible that in 1836 , Adolf Hitler ’ s paternal grandmother , Maria Anna Schicklgruber , could have become pregnant by a Jew in Graz named Frankenberger , prior to giving birth to Alois Schicklgruber/Hitler , Adolf ’ s father , in 1837 .
Of course , the truth has seldom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rabid anti-Hitler writers , such as Jetzinger .
When , in 1956 , the German magazine Der Spiegel published the results of an investigation which were the same as Maser ’ s findings , Jetzinger was apparently unfazed .
Smith notes : It is impossible to ascertain today why Hans Frank told this unfounded and outrageous falsehood .
It is clear from the confused state of his biography [ 11 ] that he suffered a mental collapse from the strain of his imprisonment and the Nuremberg kangaroo-court proceedings .
One can only assume @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he related was the product of this psychological debility .
It is less clear why Jetzinger so uncritically accepted Frank ’ s story , especially after it was factually refuted by other anti-National Socialist historians .
And it is absolutely astounding that still other historians continue to this day to parrot such nonsense in the face of a wealth of solid evidence disproving it .
For example , the System historian Robert Waite , in a book published in 1977 ( some 21 years after the Spiegel investigation ) , relates Hans Frank @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paternal grandfather was Jewish , saying : Waite ’ s work , by the way , is entitled The Psychopathic God Adolf Hitler , the title indicating the level of historical objectivity which the author maintains throughout the book .
Others , while repeating Frank ’ s long-disproved charges , have been less enthusiastic about an unqualified acceptance of them .
Joachim Fest , in his biography of the Fuehrer , concedes that Frank ’ s story is “ exceedingly dubious ” and that “ recent research has further shaken the credibility of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ notion can scarcely stand investigation.
” [ 13 ] Having said this , however , Fest proceeds to speculate that Hitler himself may have believed Frank ’ s tall tale and that “ Frank ’ s findings [ sic ] forced Hitler to doubt his own descent.
” [ 14 ] It should come as no surprise that Fest produces zero evidence to back up this peculiar notion .
Perhaps the most widely read recent biography of the Fuehrer is John Toland ’ s Adolf Hitler [ 1976 ] .
Ignoring the investigations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Spiegel , Bradley and Maser , all of which were available to him , and spurning any personal research into the matter , Toland says that Alois Hitler ’ s father was He goes on to cite Jetzinger as one source for this story , remarking that Jetzinger ’ s book is “ generally accurate.
” It should be noted that Toland may have a personal psychological motive for wishing to believe the discredited “ Jewish grandfather ” tale : He himself is a race-mixer with a Japanese wife and thus may be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of racial integrity onto others .
Yet for all their scholarly dishonesty , Waite , Fest and Toland ( each of whom is at least nominally Aryan ) do not begin to approach the absurd claim made by the Jewish psychologist Walter Langer .
In The Mind of Adolf Hitler ( 1972 ) , he presents what is perhaps the most brazen and insulting version of the “ Jewish grandfather ” lie .
In this “ psycho-historical ” analysis of Hitler ’ s personality , Langer relates an account of Hitler ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was actually a member of the Rothschild family living in Vienna .
He does not offer a single piece of evidence or documentation to substantiate this remarkable claim , but instead lists “ several factors which seem to favor its possibility , ” including : In other words , Hitler was too intelligent and capable to have been descended from humble Aryan peasant stock and therefore must have been part Jewish .
What incredible arrogance !
We noted earlier that the very first people to spread the canard that the Fuehrer was Jewish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Movement .
Thus , it is sad but unsurprising that his present-day racialist critics have tried to breathe new life into this falsehood .
“ Direct Action , ” a Canadian racialist newsletter with National Bolshevik leanings , repeated the Hans Frank accusation in December 1980 .
[ 17 ] It further charged that SS leader Reinhard Heydrich was also one-quarter Jewish , and declared that one of the real reasons that the traitor Gregor Strasser was executed at the time of the Rohm putsch was that he had “ proof of all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not explain why Hans Frank was not executed by the SS , too , if he was also in possession of this elusive “ evidence.
” Lies die hard — especially , when they are deliberately propagated by scoundrels disguised as scholars or by those who have a political axe to grind .
And yet , sometimes real events lend an aura of credibility to that which is false .
The unfortunate attraction that National Socialism exerts over certain unstable , self-hating Jews and part-Jews is well known throughout the Movement .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , distorted parody of true National Socialism which has been labeled “ Hollywood Nazism.
” Since the revival of the Movement in the early 1960s , there have been a number of Jews who have so strongly identified with the Movement that they have concealed their racial ancestry and joined our ranks .
In at least three cases [ 19 ] , these sick individuals have risen to positions of media prominence before having their backgrounds exposed .
In the most notable of these instances , Frank Collin/Cohn , founder of the splinter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Party of America , was widely presented to the public by the media as the classic example of a “ Nazi ” leader who was secretly a Jew .
[ 20 ] This and similar cases only serve to reinforce the popular misconception that Hitler himself was of Jewish descent .
These tales are spread , of course , in the hope that they will somehow discredit Adolf Hitler , his Idea , and his Movement .
National Socialists take such accusations as an insult , and rightly so .
Still , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compliment .
In the case of great men , it is quite common for Jews and others to besmirch their Aryan pedigree or reputation , or claim Aryan accomplishments as their own .
Christopher Columbus was also Jewish , they would have us believe , and likewise Shakespeare was a homosexual , Beethoven a Negro and Thomas Jefferson a race-mixer .
When the Jews and their lackeys raise such preposterous allegations against Adolf Hitler , we may wax indignant outwardly , but inwardly we should smile .
We should smile because we know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and can be so proven .
But we should also smile because we know , as National Socialists , that the Fuehrer ’ s memory belong not only to his few faithful disciples today but ultimately to the entire Aryan race .
Despite the lies which are being fed to our people today , someday the truth will prevail and they will join with us in affirming that Hitler was right .
[ 2 ] For a good discussion of the Hitler family , and especially Adolf Hitler ’ s immediate antecedents , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : His Family , Childhood and Youth , chapters one and two , passim , Hoover Institution Publications , Stanford , California , 1967 .
[ 5 ] Werner Maser , Hitler : Legend , Myth and Reality , pp .
9-10 , Harper & Row , Publishers , Inc. , English translation , New York , 1971 .
[ 12 ] Robert G. L. Waite , The Psychopathic God Adolf Hitler , pp .
126-127 , Basic Books : Inc. , Publishers , New York,1977 .
[ 13 ] Joachim C. Fest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brace Jovanovich , Inc. , English translation by Richard and Clara Winston , New York , 1973 .
[ 16 ] Walter C. Langer , The Mind of Adolf Hitler .
The Secret Wartime Report , p. 113 , Basic Books , Inc. , New York , 1972 .
[ 19 ] Frank Collin/Cohn [ discussed here ] , Daniel Burros [ of the American Nazi Party , the National Renaissance Party and the Ku Klux Klan ] and Robert Burros [ of the National Renaissance Party-no relation to Daniel Burros ] .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ were the most prominent .

The more enormous and preposterous a lie is, the quicker it captures the public’s imagination and is believed, and the harder it is to dispel.
By Martin Kerr
[S]ince the great masses of people at the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather than purposely evil, and that, therefore, in view of the primitive simplicity of their minds, they fall more easily victim to a big lie than to a little one — since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads, and they will not be able to believe the possibility in others of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of the claims as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick.” – Mein Kampf [1]
It is one of the cruel ironies of history, though perhaps not an unexpected one, that having exposed and denounced the technique of the Big Lie to the world, Adolf Hitler himself became the subject of a whole slew of falsehoods and calumnies.
It is not our purpose here to investigate all of the Big Lies which have been propagated about Adolf Hitler, National Socialism and the Third Reich, but rather to focus on one of the most long-lived and pernicious of these lies: that Hitler was of partially Jewish ancestry.
There are a number of variations of the “Hitler was part Jewish” myth, which generally have two things in common: Most are based on the accusation that Hitler’s paternal grandfather was a Jew, and all are thoroughly discredited by the available documentary evidence. That this charge is still repeated today is a testament to the enduring and burning hatred, which Adolf Hitler’s enemies still harbor for him, even now, decades after his death. At the same time, it is a classic example of the contempt for the truth which many anti-Hitler System historians display when discussing the National Socialist Era in Europe.
In point of fact, the Hitler family, including Adolf Hitler’s paternal grandfather, is one of unimpeachable Aryan lineage. Through the records of births, deaths and marriages kept by the Roman Catholic Church, it is possible to trace Hitler’s forebears back hundreds of years.
The family, which lived since time immemorial in Upper Austria, was of solid German peasant stock, and Hitler’s immediate ancestors were all either small farmers or craftsmen. (The notable exception to this, of course, was Hitler’s father, Alois Hitler, who was a commissioned official in the Austrian customs service.) The spelling and pronunciation of the family name as “Hitler” is a fairly recent development. Older versions include “Huettler” and “Hiedler,” the former being the original family name from which the other forms were derived. [2]
The sole irregularity in Hitler’s ancestry was the illegitimacy of his father. Because he was born out of wedlock, Alois Hitler bore the maiden name of his mother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, for a good portion of his life. Even after his mother finally married his father, Johann Georg Hiedler, Alois retained the name Schicklgruber. Not until he was 39 years old, did he reclaim his proper family name, which he spelled and pronounced in the manner which the world has come to know: Hitler. [3]
Yet this illegitimacy in itself is not significant or even unusual. As the anti-NS historian Bradley F. Smith notes in his well-researched and generally impartial book Adolf Hitler: His Family, Childhood and Youth [1967]:
Although illegitimacy was frowned upon by the authorities, especially the Catholic Church, it was common in the Austrian countryside. In some districts, 40 percent of births were illegitimate. The figure for Lower Austria as late as 1903 was still 24 percent. An illegitimate child in a peasant household, therefore, was not an unusual phenomenon.” [4]
Unusual or not, the illegitimacy of Alois has served as a crucial factual base for those who seek to spread the falsehood that Hitler had a Jewish grandfather.
Early Smears
As anyone who has firsthand experience in the racialist movement knows, it is common practice for the Jews themselves to attempt on occasion to discredit up-and-coming anti-Jewish personalities by spreading spurious rumors that this or that leader is really a Jew, or a homosexual, or a communist, or a government agent. Indeed, with slanders of this sort even some individuals within the racialist movement will attempt to undercut their political rivals.
Adolf Hitler was the target of such underhanded, contemptible opposition from within the Movement at least as early as July of 1921. A clique of NSDAP members who evidently felt that Hitler was not suited to lead the Party began a whisper campaign that he was of Jewish ancestry.
As is always the case in stories concerning Hitler’s allegedly Jewish ancestors, these conspirators had absolutely no documentary evidence for their claims, and relied instead on false innuendo, unfounded suspicions, and ill will. Their efforts culminated in the circulation of a leaflet by NSDAP member Ernst Ehrensperger, which read in part:
Hitler believes the time has come to introduce disunity and dissension into our ranks at the behest of his shady backers, and thus promote the interests of Jewry and its henchmen And how is he conducting this struggle? Like a real Jew.” [5]
Although this may have been the first effort to smear Hitler in this manner, it certainly was not the last. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, those hostile to the Fuehrer propagated a number of variations of this tale, including versions that were often mutually contradictory. The London Daily Mirror futilely tried to add some substance to this lie in October 1933 by publishing a photograph of a tombstone of a Polish Jew who had borne the same name as Hitler’s. Two Jewish newspapers, Forward in the United States and Haynt in Poland, quickly took it upon themselves to spread this particular story further, the implication being that the deceased Jew was Hitler’s grandfather.
However, since this specific Jew was born in 1832, he was only five years older than Hitler’s father, which meant that he couldn’t have been the man who sired the illegitimate Alois — unless the Jew in Poland sired the Fuhrer’s father in Austria at age five.
Thus, the first “Jewish grandfather” story was laid to rest. [6]
The infamous anti-National Socialist propagandist Konrad Heiden, himself part-Jewish, also suggested in his venomous biographies of Hitler, published in 1932 and 1936, that Hitler was of Jewish descent. Although these books were highly regarded in circles hostile to the Movement, this one lie was correctly deemed too unlikely to be taken seriously and was generally dismissed. [7]
Hans Frank’s Big Lie Disproved
Strangely enough, the most persistent version of the myth was not widely publicized until 1956, long after the Fuehrer’s death, with the publication of Franz Jetzinger’s Hitler’s Jugend: Phantasien, Luegen und die Wahrheit [Hitler’s Youth: Fantasies, Lies and the Truth], Whereas previous attempts to stigmatize Hitler by accusing him of being part Jewish simply took the form of wild rumors which were as devoid of documentation as they were detached from reality, Jetzinger at least made some effort to back up his case.
Bradley Smith summarizes Jetzinger’s charges:
In the German edition of his book, Hitler’s Jugend (pp. 28-35), and especially in the later English abridgement, Hitler’s Youth (pp. 19-30), Jetzinger argues, with increasing enthusiasm, that Alois Hitler’s father was really a Jew from Graz by the name of Frankenberger. Jetzinger’s only source for these surprising contentions is Im Angesicht des Galgens (In the Face of the Gallows), written by Hans Frank, former Nazi lawyer and Governor General of Poland, while awaiting execution at Nuremberg. In a narrative studded with demonstrable errors — in part exposed by Jetzinger’s own research –– Frank states that towards the end of 1930 he went to Austria on Hitler’s orders to investigate a threat of exposure of an alleged Jewish ancestor of the Fuehrer. In Graz, Frank claims that he learned Alois’ mother had been employed by the Jewish family Frankenberger, that she had become pregnant while in their employ, and that the family paid her support money in later years on the assumption that the child’s father was the young Frankenberger. Frank’s narrative is vague and lacks confirming evidence. He claims letters were extant to support his story, but neither he nor anyone else has ever been able to produce them.” [8]
Although it most assuredly was not his purpose in once again raising the “Jewish grandfather” allegation, Jetzinger performed in this way a valuable service to our Movement, for his accusation spurred other researchers on to determine once and for all the truth or falsity of the myth.What these researchers found, of course, was that Hans Frank was lying.
The German historian and biographer of Adolf Hitler, Werner Maser, who is somewhat less hysterical in his opposition to National Socialism and its founder than other anti-NS writers, discovered that:
None of the Frankenbergers known to have lived in Graz could have been the father of Alois Schicklgruber, nor does there appear to be any trace of a German Jew bearing this name or any variant thereof in the nineteenth century. Indeed, from the end of the fifteenth century until a decade after Maria Anna Schicklgruber’s death, no Jews were residents of Graz. Under the terms of the treaty concluded on March 19, 1496 between Emperor Maximilian I and the Styrian towns, all Jews were to be expelled from the province by January 6, 1497… Not until 1781, in the reign of Joseph II, were they allowed to re-enter the Duchy of Styria and then only for a few weeks at a time, when they were admitted to the annual fairs in Graz, Klagenfurt, Laibach and Linz against the payment of a fixed sum. But as early as September 9, 1783, the rights of the Jews were again curtailed, a measure that was reinforced by further discriminatory regulations in 1797, 1823 and 1828. This situation remained unchanged until the beginning of the 1860s.” [9]
In other words, it is simply impossible that in 1836, Adolf Hitler’s paternal grandmother, Maria Anna Schicklgruber, could have become pregnant by a Jew in Graz named Frankenberger, prior to giving birth to Alois Schicklgruber/Hitler, Adolf’s father, in 1837.
Of course, the truth has seldom acted as a constraint on the more rabid anti-Hitler writers, such as Jetzinger. When, in 1956, the German magazine Der Spiegel published the results of an investigation which were the same as Maser’s findings, Jetzinger was apparently unfazed. Smith notes:
“In the English abridgement of his work, Jetzinger dismissed the Spiegel story, not by presenting new evidence, but by restating with increased emphasis that he believed Adolf Hitler’s paternal grandfather was Jewish.” [10]
It is impossible to ascertain today why Hans Frank told this unfounded and outrageous falsehood. It is clear from the confused state of his biography [11] that he suffered a mental collapse from the strain of his imprisonment and the Nuremberg kangaroo-court proceedings. One can only assume that the “Jewish grandfather” story he related was the product of this psychological debility.
It is less clear why Jetzinger so uncritically accepted Frank’s story, especially after it was factually refuted by other anti-National Socialist historians. And it is absolutely astounding that still other historians continue to this day to parrot such nonsense in the face of a wealth of solid evidence disproving it.
Anti-Hitler Writers Ignore the Evidence
For example, the System historian Robert Waite, in a book published in 1977 (some 21 years after the Spiegel investigation), relates Hans Frank’s assertion that Hitler’s paternal grandfather was Jewish, saying:
Despite Frank’s reputation as the ‘Butcher of Poland,’ there would seem to be reason for believing his story. He wrote his memoirs as a condemned man who had converted to Catholicism. He wrote, in part, to expiate his sins. He had no apparent reason to misrepresent Hitler or to invent the story.”
Waite’s work, by the way, is entitled The Psychopathic God Adolf Hitler, the title indicating the level of historical objectivity which the author maintains throughout the book.
Others, while repeating Frank’s long-disproved charges, have been less enthusiastic about an unqualified acceptance of them. Joachim Fest, in his biography of the Fuehrer, concedes that Frank’s story is “exceedingly dubious” and that “recent research has further shaken the credibility of his statement, so that the whole notion can scarcely stand investigation.” [13] Having said this, however, Fest proceeds to speculate that Hitler himself may have believed Frank’s tall tale and that “Frank’s findings [sic] forced Hitler to doubt his own descent.” [14] It should come as no surprise that Fest produces zero evidence to back up this peculiar notion.
Perhaps the most widely read recent biography of the Fuehrer is John Toland’s Adolf Hitler [1976]. Ignoring the investigations into Frank’s story by Der Spiegel, Bradley and Maser, all of which were available to him, and spurning any personal research into the matter, Toland says that Alois Hitler’s father was
probably a man from the neighborhood. There is a slight possibility that Hitler’s grandfather was a wealthy Jew named Frankenberger or Frankenreither; that Maria Anna had been a domestic in this Jewish household in Graz and the young son had gotten her pregnant. [15]
He goes on to cite Jetzinger as one source for this story, remarking that Jetzinger’s book is “generally accurate.” It should be noted that Toland may have a personal psychological motive for wishing to believe the discredited “Jewish grandfather” tale: He himself is a race-mixer with a Japanese wife and thus may be overly eager to project his own lack of racial integrity onto others.
Yet for all their scholarly dishonesty, Waite, Fest and Toland (each of whom is at least nominally Aryan) do not begin to approach the absurd claim made by the Jewish psychologist Walter Langer.
In The Mind of Adolf Hitler (1972), he presents what is perhaps the most brazen and insulting version of the “Jewish grandfather” lie. In this “psycho-historical” analysis of Hitler’s personality, Langer relates an account of Hitler’s ancestry which maintains that his paternal grandfather was actually a member of the Rothschild family living in Vienna. He does not offer a single piece of evidence or documentation to substantiate this remarkable claim, but instead lists “several factors which seem to favor its possibility,” including:
“The intelligence and behavior of Alois [Hitler’s father], as well as that of his two sons [Adolf and Alois, Jr.], is completely out of keeping with that usually found in Austrian peasant families. Such ambitiousness and extraordinary political intuition are more in keeping with the Rothschild tradition.” [16]
In other words, Hitler was too intelligent and capable to have been descended from humble Aryan peasant stock and therefore must have been part Jewish. What incredible arrogance!
We noted earlier that the very first people to spread the canard that the Fuehrer was Jewish were Hitler’s opponents within the Movement. Thus, it is sad but unsurprising that his present-day racialist critics have tried to breathe new life into this falsehood. “Direct Action,” a Canadian racialist newsletter with National Bolshevik leanings, repeated the Hans Frank accusation in December 1980. [17] It further charged that SS leader Reinhard Heydrich was also one-quarter Jewish, and declared that one of the real reasons that the traitor Gregor Strasser was executed at the time of the Rohm putsch was that he had “proof of all this.” [18] The newsletter does not explain why Hans Frank was not executed by the SS, too, if he was also in possession of this elusive “evidence.”
Lies Die Hard
Lies die hard — especially, when they are deliberately propagated by scoundrels disguised as scholars or by those who have a political axe to grind. And yet, sometimes real events lend an aura of credibility to that which is false.
The unfortunate attraction that National Socialism exerts over certain unstable, self-hating Jews and part-Jews is well known throughout the Movement. This is particularly true of the grotesque, distorted parody of true National Socialism which has been labeled “Hollywood Nazism.” Since the revival of the Movement in the early 1960s, there have been a number of Jews who have so strongly identified with the Movement that they have concealed their racial ancestry and joined our ranks. In at least three cases [19], these sick individuals have risen to positions of media prominence before having their backgrounds exposed.
In the most notable of these instances, Frank Collin/Cohn, founder of the splinter group which calls itself the National Socialist Party of America, was widely presented to the public by the media as the classic example of a “Nazi” leader who was secretly a Jew. [20]
This and similar cases only serve to reinforce the popular misconception that Hitler himself was of Jewish descent.
Insult or Compliment?
These tales are spread, of course, in the hope that they will somehow discredit Adolf Hitler, his Idea, and his Movement. National Socialists take such accusations as an insult, and rightly so.
Still, in a way, they are an unintended compliment. In the case of great men, it is quite common for Jews and others to besmirch their Aryan pedigree or reputation, or claim Aryan accomplishments as their own. Christopher Columbus was also Jewish, they would have us believe, and likewise Shakespeare was a homosexual, Beethoven a Negro and Thomas Jefferson a race-mixer. When the Jews and their lackeys raise such preposterous allegations against Adolf Hitler, we may wax indignant outwardly, but inwardly we should smile.
We should smile because we know that such accusations are totally false, and can be so proven. But we should also smile because we know, as National Socialists, that the Fuehrer’s memory belong not only to his few faithful disciples today but ultimately to the entire Aryan race. Despite the lies which are being fed to our people today, someday the truth will prevail and they will join with us in affirming that Hitler was right.
Endnotes
[1] Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, (Manheim translation) pp. 231-232.
[2] For a good discussion of the Hitler family, and especially Adolf Hitler’s immediate antecedents, see Bradley F. Smith, Adolf Hitler: His Family, Childhood and Youth, chapters one and two, passim, Hoover Institution Publications, Stanford, California, 1967.
[3] Ibid, p. 29.
[4] Ibid, p. 20.
[5] Werner Maser, Hitler: Legend, Myth and Reality, pp. 9-10, Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., English translation, New York, 1971.
[6] Ibid, p. 10.
[7] Ibid, p. 12.
[8] Smith, p. 157.
[9] Maser, p. 13. See also p. 351, f. 46.
[10] Smith, p. 159.
[11] Smith, p. 158.
[12] Robert G. L. Waite, The Psychopathic God Adolf Hitler, pp. 126-127, Basic Books: Inc., Publishers, New York,1977.
[13] Joachim C. Fest, Hitler, p. 15, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., English translation by Richard and Clara Winston, New York, 1973.
[14] Ibid.
[15] John Toland, Adolf Hitler, pp. 3-4, Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, New York, 1976.
[16] Walter C. Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler. The Secret Wartime Report, p. 113, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1972.
[17] “What Strasser Knew,” Direct Action, number 26, pp. 10-11, Toronto, Canada, December 1980.
[18] lbid, p. 11.
[19] Frank Collin/Cohn [discussed here], Daniel Burros [of the American Nazi Party, the National Renaissance Party and the Ku Klux Klan] and Robert Burros [of the National Renaissance Party-no relation to Daniel Burros]. There have been others, but these were the most prominent.
[20] “Immigration Records Prove Frank Collin is Jewish,” WHITE POWER, number 86, pp. 4-5, George Lincoln Rockwell Party, Inc., Arlington, Va., July-August 1978.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-09-18--Study Links Tylenol Consumption with Risk Taking

The psychological side effects of acetaminophen , aka Tylenol , continue to mount , with research showing users are more likely to make risky decisions .
When coupled with past research linking this supposedly safe pain reliever to blunted empathy and emotions , the widespread social effects on society could be immense Acetaminophen , commonly known by its brand name Tylenol , is one of the most commonly used medications worldwide — and research suggests it could be causing users to engage in more risky behaviors .
[ 1 ] In the U.S. alone , acetaminophen can be found in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and is taken by 23 % of — or 52 million — Americans each week .
[ 2 ] Many don ’ t think twice about popping a Tylenol or two to relieve a headache , reduce a fever or ease minor aches and pains or cold and allergy symptoms , but research continues to reveal that this supposedly “ safe ” pain reliever has more risks than many people realize .
Among them are surprising effects on psychological processes such as behavior and perception , including altering willingness to take risks .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a daily basis , even slight changes in risk-taking behaviors “ could have important effects on society , ” study co-author Baldwin Way , an associate professor of psychology at The Ohio State University , noted in a press release .
[ 3 ] Acetaminophen Makes People More Likely to Take Risks The study involved 189 college students , who took a standard recommended adult dosage of 1,000 milligrams ( mg ) of acetaminophen or a placebo .
They were then asked to rate the riskiness of activities such as bungee jumping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home alone at night in an unsafe area and starting a new career in your mid-30s .
Those under the influence of acetaminophen rated these activities as less risky than those who took a placebo .
“ Acetaminophen seems to make people feel less negative emotion when they consider risky activities — they just don ’ t feel as scared , ” Way said .
[ 4 ] In a second part of the study , 545 college students took part in a computer task intended to measure risk-taking behavior .
The students @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a balloon in order to earn money .
The bigger the balloon , the more money they would receive , but if the balloon got too big and burst , they would lose their money .
As in the first study , those who took acetaminophen took more risk , pumping the balloons more times and earning more burst balloons , than those who took a placebo .
“ If you ’ re risk-averse , you may pump a few times and then decide to cash out because you don ’ t want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money , ” Way said .
“ But for those who are on acetaminophen , as the balloon gets bigger , we believe they have less anxiety and less negative emotion about how big the balloon is getting and the possibility of it bursting.
” [ 5 ] It ’ s previously been suggested that those with increased risk-taking on these types of computer-simulated tasks may be more likely to engage in risky behaviors in real-life as well , including using drugs and alcohol , stealing and driving without a seatbelt .
[ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , acetaminophen has also been found to blunt both positive and negative emotions .
In this way , Way and colleagues revealed in 2015 that over-the-counter acetaminophen provides relief from “ pain and pleasures alike , ” essentially dampening users ’ ability to experience emotionally pleasurable sensations .
[ 7 ] The next year , in 2016 , Way and colleagues found acetaminophen to be an “ empathy killer , ” [ 8 ] as it reduced users ’ empathy in response to others ’ pain .
Because empathy plays an important role @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alterations in empathy could be having broad social side effects .
[ 9 ] In a 2019 study , Way and colleagues again compared acetaminophen to a “ social analgesic , ” stating that it blunts “ social pain ” by reducing the activity of the anterior insula and anterior cingulate brain regions , which are associated with emotional awareness and motivation .
[ 10 ] Even positive empathy was blunted by the drug .
When people were given 1,000 mg of acetaminophen , then read scenarios about uplifting experiences of other people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ empathic feelings directed toward others , once again suggesting that the widespread use of acetaminophen could be having a negative effect on prosocial behavior on a societal level .
[ 11 ] Acetaminophen has also been found to cause an “ inhibition of evaluative processing , ” [ 12 ] meaning it could alter your ability to make decisions and cause you to react slower or miss errors that you would spot otherwise .
[ 13 ] Acetaminophen Is ‘ Not Particularly Effective ’ or Safe Acetaminophen ’ s reputation as a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being called into question , and anyone who uses it should be aware that in addition to psychological effects , acetaminophen is linked to serious physical adverse effects .
GreenMedInfo.com has compiled 236 studies related to acetaminophen ’ s toxicity , and a European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy editorial concluded , “ We have considerable evidence that as well as not being particularly effective , neither is it particularly safe.
” [ 14 ] Some of the health risks linked to acetaminophen use include : [ 15 ] What ’ s more , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for treating back pain , “ practically ineffective ” for arthritis and “ in the least effective quartile of drugs ” for treating postoperative pain .
It ’ s also only modestly effective for migraines and tension-type headaches , while no evidence shows that it works to relieve pain related to cancer , menstrual cramps , rheumatoid arthritis or the neck .
[ 16 ] Considering its significant risks — including psychological risks that are only beginning to be understood and explored–and questionable effectiveness , it makes sense to try nontoxic , natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there are hundreds to choose from .

The psychological side effects of acetaminophen, aka Tylenol, continue to mount, with research showing users are more likely to make risky decisions. When coupled with past research linking this supposedly safe pain reliever to blunted empathy and emotions, the widespread social effects on society could be immense
Acetaminophen, commonly known by its brand name Tylenol, is one of the most commonly used medications worldwide — and research suggests it could be causing users to engage in more risky behaviors.[1] In the U.S. alone, acetaminophen can be found in more than 600 prescription and over-the-counter drugs and is taken by 23% of — or 52 million — Americans each week.[2]
Many don’t think twice about popping a Tylenol or two to relieve a headache, reduce a fever or ease minor aches and pains or cold and allergy symptoms, but research continues to reveal that this supposedly “safe” pain reliever has more risks than many people realize. Among them are surprising effects on psychological processes such as behavior and perception, including altering willingness to take risks.
Considering that so many people take acetaminophen on a daily basis, even slight changes in risk-taking behaviors “could have important effects on society,” study co-author Baldwin Way, an associate professor of psychology at The Ohio State University, noted in a press release.[3]
Acetaminophen Makes People More Likely to Take Risks
The study involved 189 college students, who took a standard recommended adult dosage of 1,000 milligrams (mg) of acetaminophen or a placebo. They were then asked to rate the riskiness of activities such as bungee jumping, taking a skydiving class, walking home alone at night in an unsafe area and starting a new career in your mid-30s.
Those under the influence of acetaminophen rated these activities as less risky than those who took a placebo. “Acetaminophen seems to make people feel less negative emotion when they consider risky activities — they just don’t feel as scared,” Way said.[4]
In a second part of the study, 545 college students took part in a computer task intended to measure risk-taking behavior. The students had to click a button to inflate a balloon in order to earn money. The bigger the balloon, the more money they would receive, but if the balloon got too big and burst, they would lose their money.
As in the first study, those who took acetaminophen took more risk, pumping the balloons more times and earning more burst balloons, than those who took a placebo. “If you’re risk-averse, you may pump a few times and then decide to cash out because you don’t want the balloon to burst and lose your money,” Way said. “But for those who are on acetaminophen, as the balloon gets bigger, we believe they have less anxiety and less negative emotion about how big the balloon is getting and the possibility of it bursting.”[5]
It’s previously been suggested that those with increased risk-taking on these types of computer-simulated tasks may be more likely to engage in risky behaviors in real-life as well, including using drugs and alcohol, stealing and driving without a seatbelt.[6]
Acetaminophen Blunts Empathy, Positive and Negative Emotions
While potentially increasing risky behaviors, acetaminophen has also been found to blunt both positive and negative emotions. In this way, Way and colleagues revealed in 2015 that over-the-counter acetaminophen provides relief from “pain and pleasures alike,” essentially dampening users’ ability to experience emotionally pleasurable sensations.[7]
The next year, in 2016, Way and colleagues found acetaminophen to be an “empathy killer,”[8] as it reduced users’ empathy in response to others’ pain. Because empathy plays an important role in prosocial and antisocial behaviors, acetaminophen-induced alterations in empathy could be having broad social side effects.[9]
In a 2019 study, Way and colleagues again compared acetaminophen to a “social analgesic,” stating that it blunts “social pain” by reducing the activity of the anterior insula and anterior cingulate brain regions, which are associated with emotional awareness and motivation.[10] Even positive empathy was blunted by the drug.
When people were given 1,000 mg of acetaminophen, then read scenarios about uplifting experiences of other people, the acetaminophen reduced personal pleasure and empathic feelings directed toward others, once again suggesting that the widespread use of acetaminophen could be having a negative effect on prosocial behavior on a societal level.[11]
Acetaminophen has also been found to cause an “inhibition of evaluative processing,”[12] meaning it could alter your ability to make decisions and cause you to react slower or miss errors that you would spot otherwise.[13]
Acetaminophen Is ‘Not Particularly Effective’ or Safe
Acetaminophen’s reputation as a “safe and effective” painkiller is increasingly being called into question, and anyone who uses it should be aware that in addition to psychological effects, acetaminophen is linked to serious physical adverse effects.
GreenMedInfo.com has compiled 236 studies related to acetaminophen’s toxicity, and a European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy editorial concluded, “We have considerable evidence that as well as not being particularly effective, neither is it particularly safe.”[14] Some of the health risks linked to acetaminophen use include:[15]
Increased mortality
Cardiovascular adverse events, including heart attack , stroke and fatal coronary artery disease
, and fatal Gastrointestinal adverse events, including gastroduodenal ulcers and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage Acute liver failure necessitating transplantation
failure necessitating transplantation Abnormal liver function
What’s more, acetaminophen has been shown to be ineffective for treating back pain, “practically ineffective” for arthritis and “in the least effective quartile of drugs” for treating postoperative pain. It’s also only modestly effective for migraines and tension-type headaches, while no evidence shows that it works to relieve pain related to cancer, menstrual cramps, rheumatoid arthritis or the neck.[16]
Considering its significant risks — including psychological risks that are only beginning to be understood and explored–and questionable effectiveness, it makes sense to try nontoxic, natural pain relief options first — of which there are hundreds to choose from.
References
[1] Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nsaa108, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa108, https://academic.oup.com/scan/advance-article/doi/10.1093/scan/nsaa108/5897711
[2] Consumer Healthcare Products Association, Acetaminophen https://www.chpa.org/Acetaminophen.aspx
[3] Ohio State News September 8, 2020 https://news.osu.edu/a-pain-reliever-that-alters-perceptions-of-risk/
[4] Ohio State News September 8, 2020 https://news.osu.edu/a-pain-reliever-that-alters-perceptions-of-risk/
[5] Ohio State News September 8, 2020 https://news.osu.edu/a-pain-reliever-that-alters-perceptions-of-risk/
[6] Ohio State News September 8, 2020 https://news.osu.edu/a-pain-reliever-that-alters-perceptions-of-risk/
[7] Psychological Science April 10, 2015 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797615570366
[8] Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Sep; 11(9): 1345-1353. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015806/
[9] Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Sep; 11(9): 1345-1353. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5015806/
[10] Front Psychol. 2019; 10: 538. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6455058/
[11] Front Psychol. 2019; 10: 538. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6455058/
[12] Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Volume 11, Issue 6, June 2016, Pages 899-906, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw023, https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/11/6/899/2224073
[13] Science Alert April 12, 2016 https://www.sciencealert.com/tylenol-may-make-it-harder-for-users-to-spot-errors-says-study
[14] European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy Volume 23, Issue 4 https://ejhp.bmj.com/content/23/4/187
[15] European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy Volume 23, Issue 4 https://ejhp.bmj.com/content/23/4/187
[16] European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy Volume 23, Issue 4 https://ejhp.bmj.com/content/23/4/187


renegadetribune--2020-09-18--jews Alarmed at the Amount of People Who Know The Truth About the Holocaust Hoax

jews have been kvetching for the past few days about the results of a recent survey , which shows them @ @ @ @ @ needed .

jews have been kvetching for the past few days about the results of a recent survey, which shows them that much more indoctrination is needed.