renegadetribune--2020-03-17--Hitler Annexed the Sudetenland

Hitler Annexed the Sudetenland

Note : This article is sourced from Richard Tedor ’ s book , “ Hitler ’ s Revolution ” .
Noble has edited & condensed Tedor ’ s chapter ( European Diplomacy – Czechoslovakia ) on Hitler annexing the Sudetenland .
Tedor ’ s book has 270 pages of text , supplemented by over 1000 footnotes and a bibliography of over 200 authors , mostly German .
This book is still available on Amazon .
Secure a copy now before Jewry has it “ canceled ” .
https : //www.amazon.com/Hitlers-revolution-Richard-Tedor/dp/0988368226 For greater context , check out Kyle Hunt ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ //www.renegadebroadcasting.com/the-blitzkrieg-broadcast-w-kyle-hunt-4-11-14/ A few months after the Anschluss , Germany annexed the Sudetenland , the ethnic German territory lining the periphery of western Czechoslovakia .
The transfer of the region to German control provoked a serious war scare .
The controversy traced its origin to the 1919 Versailles system .
During World War 1 , Czechs served in the Austro-Hungarian army .
Immigrants in London & Paris established the Czech Committee on November 14th , 1915 .
Two Czechs in exile , Tomas Masaryk & Eduard Benes , won the Entente ’ s endorsement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carved from portions of the Hapsburg realm .
On October 18th , 1918 , Czechs in Paris and in the USA claimed Czechoslovakian independence .
The new country had three components .
Furthest east was Ruthenia , the population of which voluntarily joined Czechoslovakia .
In the center was Slovakia , and many Slovaks wanted independence or at least considerable autonomy .
The western part consisted of Bohemia & Moravia , where three million German Austrians dwelled with the Czechs .
These Germans wished to remain with Austria .
Masaryk & Benes enjoyed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Czechoslovakia .
Masaryk persuaded ( United States ) President Wilson to alter his 14 points , which promised each nationality of Austria-Hungary the opportunity for autonomous development , to exclude Germans .
Benes consciously underestimated the number of Sudeten Germans by nearly a million .
He falsely claimed that they were not a unified minority , but lived in settlements integrated with Czechs .
Rich in raw materials & industry , the border territory offered Czechoslovakia a topographical defensive barrier against Germany .
Benes based his deliberations more on economic & strategic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the German population .
Since the Paris peace conference continued until mid-1919 , the German provinces were technically still part of Austria when the Austrian republic held its first democratic election that February 16 .
The Sudeten Germans prepared ballots to participate .
The Czech army forcibly disrupted the arrangements .
On March 4 , thousands of Sudeten Germans organized peaceful demonstrations in their towns & villages to protest .
Czech soldiers fired into the unarmed crowds , killing 54 Germans , 20 of them women .
The Allies finalized a compact with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ promised the Allies that his country would “ give the Germans all rights they are entitled to… It will all in all be a very liberal regime.
” Denigrating the ethnic German population to “ immigrant ” status , the Czech government instituted a policy of “ rapid de-Germanizing ” in Bohemia and in the Sudetenland .
Prague transferred military garrisons , railroad personnel , civil servants , prison populations and even hospital patients in large numbers to these ethnic German areas to manipulate the census figures .
Czech officials tallied Czech transients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” seldom extended beyond two days .
Between 1923 and 1932 , the state conducted 8,972 legal proceedings against dissident members of ethnic minorities .
Defendants in sedition trials often included Sudeten Germans belonging to sports leagues , youth groups , singing societies , or backpacking clubs .
Prague established an immense “ border zone ” in which lived 85 percent of all Sudeten Germans , the entire Polish & Ruthenian populations , and 95 percent of the Hungarian colony .
It came under permanent martial law .
The army supervised the administration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public works , the telephone service and forestry .
Military authorities limited the civil liberties of citizens in the “ border zone , ” which comprised 56 percent of the entire country .
This did not prevent Benes from lauding Czechoslovakia as a “ lighthouse of democracy.
” Although during the first years of Hitler ’ s chancellorship , few among the German public were concerned with Czechoslovakia , for Hitler himself , the fate of the Sudetenland symbolized the tragedy of Germans under foreign rule .
The Sudeten people waged a dogged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maintain their German identity .
Hitler made it his personal mission to recover the Sudetenland .
He introduced the topic during the Reichstag speech on February 20th , 1938 .
“ As long as Germany was herself weak & defenseless , she had to simply accept the continuous persecution of German people along our borders… The interests of the German Reich also include the protection of those fellow Germans who are unable on their own , on our very frontier , to insure their right to basic human , political and ideological freedoms.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ attention to Czechoslovakia .
Geographically , the country resembled a spear point penetrating deeply into Reich ’ s territory .
This constituted a potential national security threat no responsible leader could ignore .
In January 1924 , Paris & Prague concluded a “ friendship pact ” containing a military clause .
This envisioned mutual general staff talks to prepare a joint defensive strategy in case of attack by a common enemy .
The signatories followed with a formal military treaty in October 1925 .
Benes replaced the 85-year old Masaryk as president of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ months before becoming president , Benes , as foreign minister , had concluded a military alliance with the Soviet Union .
The pact provided for significant Czech-Russian cooperation .
By the beginning of 1936 , the Czechs had completed 32 air fields sited near the German frontier as bases for the rapidly expanding Red Air Force .
They established depots to stockpile aviation fuel , aerial bombs and other war materiel .
The Red Army stationed troops in Bohemia & Moravia to undergo parachute training for a possible airborne assault against Germany .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ministry in Prague and to local command centers .
On February 12th , 1937 , the London Daily Mail reported that immediately after ratification of the Prague-Moscow pact , Russian flight officers inspected Czech air bases & fuel dumps for their air force .
Prague was a converging point for Communist immigrants who had fled Germany in 1933 , and Austria after the Anschluss .
Sir Orme Sargent , of the British Foreign Office , called Czechoslovakia a “ distribution center ” for Stalin ’ s Comintern propaganda against Germany .
With France @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military alliances since 1936 , the Fuhrer felt boxed in .
When he re-garrisoned the Rhineland on March 7 of that year , Benes offered France the support of the Czechoslovakian army for a joint invasion of Germany .
During the months to follow , it swelled to a force of 1,453,000 men .
The Austrian Anschluss encouraged the Sudeten German Party , the SdP .
Under the leadership of its founder , Konrad Henlein , it had already won 44 seats in the Czechoslovakian chamber of deputies and 23 in the senate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ At an SdP assembly in Carlsbad on April 25th , 1938 , Heinlein demanded autonomy for the ethnic German region .
With 90 percent of Sudeten voters behind him , he had sufficient influence to compel the Czechs to enter negotiations with his party .
Henlein & Karl Frank had met with Hitler on March 28 , but were unable to persuade the Fuhrer to pressure the Czechs .
Joachim von Ribbentrop told the two guests that it was not Germany ’ s task “ to offer individual suggestions as to what demands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Berlin instructed the German embassy in Prague to limit support of the SdP to private talks with Czechoslovakian statesmen , “ if the occasion presents itself.
” The allegation of post-war historians that at the meeting , Hitler ordered Henlein to impose impossible terms in order to provoke the Czechs , is without substance .
The British government monitored the escalating controversy .
The chiefs of staff from the Cabinet Committee on Foreign Policy came up with a report for the committee explaining that the British & French armies were too weak @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Italy and Japan in an expanding conflict over Czechoslovakia .
Chamberlain & Lord Halifax considered the military assessment “ an extremely melancholy document.
” Halifax summarized on April 27 , “ Neither we nor France were equipped for a war with Germany.
” France ’ s new Prime Minister , Eduard Daladier , visited London on April 28 to personally persuade Chamberlain to publicly guarantee English protection for Czechoslovakia .
His British colleague retorted that Benes has never treated the German minority in the territories he annexed in a liberal manner as promised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ England would never begin a war to prevent the nationalities of central Europe from expressing their will in a plebiscite ( direct vote ) .
That month , Hitler ordered General Wilhelm Keitel , chief of the Armed Forces Supreme Command ( OKW ) , to prepare a study on the possible invasion of Czechoslovakia .
He told Keitel that he did not at present intend to invade .
The guidelines , that Hitler furnished the OKW , emphasized that he would reject any scenario proposing a “ strategic surprise attack out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possibility of justification.
” The Fuhrer described “ an untenable situation for us should the major confrontation in the East with Bolshevism ever come… Czechoslovakia would then be the springboard for the Red Army and a landing place for its air force.
” On May 20 , Benes called up over 150,000 military reservists to active duty , claiming that the measure was necessary because of a secret mobilization of the German armed forces .
The French military envoy in Berlin cabled his government , saying that he saw no evidence of larger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two British army officers on his Berlin embassy staff on an extensive reconnaissance through the German border provinces of Saxony & Silesia .
He wrote later , “ They could discover no sign of unusual , or significant , Germany military activity , nor indeed could any of the military attaches of other foreign missions in Berlin , who were similarly engaged in scouring the country.
” Hitler , more or less , ignored Benes ’ provocation and took no action , military or otherwise .
The Jewish-controlled media in Paris , Prague @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ spurious allegations about German troop deployments .
They published stories about how the Fuhrer had massed his divisions to bluff the Czechs into submitting to his demands .
When Benes defiantly countered with his own partial mobilization , Hitler supposedly “ backed down ” and recalled his formations , a profound humiliation for a dictator who was “ incapable of acting on his own threats.
” His declarations regarding the Sudetenland were “ nothing but hot air.
” The May crisis impressed Hitler with how hostile the western democracies & Czechoslovakia were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ publicly reaffirmed its military obligation to the Czechs .
He concluded that a peaceful settlement of the Sudeten issue was unlikely .
Hitler still possessed a diplomatic trump ; democracy ’ s own arguments about human rights .
He publicly stated , “ What the Germans insist on is the right to self-determination that every other nation also possesses… I demand that the oppression of the three-and-a-half million Germans in Czechoslovakia stop , and that in its place the free right to self-determination step in.
” This was the Achilles heel ( weakness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A plebiscite ( direct vote ) for Sudetenland independence also had pitfalls .
Prague opposed the idea because the precedent would encourage the Slovaks , Hungarians , Poles and Ruthenians to demand one as well .
Since these minorities suffered under-representation in government , and from oppression , the result would likely dissolve Czechoslovakia .
The French statesman , Daladier , proposed a compromise .
Czechoslovakia would cede the Sudetenland to Germany without conducting a plebiscite .
In this way , the Czech state would remain reasonably intact .
Its importance to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , was that “ in any military operation there are wonderful possibilities for attacking Germany from Czechoslovak territory.
” French Aviation Minister , Pierre Cot , echoed this attitude .
He believed that France & England needed Czechoslovakia , “ because from this state the German economy and the German industry are most easily to be destroyed with bombs… Joint attacks of the French & Czech air forces can very quickly destroy all German production facilities.
” In August , Chamberlain proposed travelling to Germany to meet with Hitler to settle the Sudeten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from his host that Germany would take no military action during the negotiations .
On September 21 , Benes unconditionally acquiesced to the Sudetenland plebiscite proposal .
During September , Chamberlain visited Germany three times .
The first meeting with Hitler took place in Berchtesgaden on September 15 .
The session was cordial & constructive .
Chamberlain approved Hitler ’ s proposals for the Sudeten areas to be annexed .
In Berlin , the German monitoring station in the Reich ’ s Ministry of Aviation eavesdropped on a telephone conversation between Benes and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Undermining Daladier , Mandel told Benes , “ Paris & London have no right to dictate your attitude to you .
If your territory is violated , you should not wait a second to issue orders to your army to defend the homeland… If you fire the first shot in self defense , the cannons of France , Great Britain and also Soviet Russia will begin firing on their own.
” The Germans also intercepted communications between Prague and its London & Paris embassies .
The Benes government had instructed them to stall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in England and in France topple Chamberlain & Daladier .
On September 22 , Hitler conferred ( Munich Accord ) with Chamberlain at the Hotel Dresen in Bad Godesberg .
Reports of mounting unrest in the Sudetenland clouded the atmosphere .
Henlein had formed an ethnic German militia , numbering nearly 40,000 men , which skirmished with Czech soldiers & police .
The Czech government correspondingly implemented more repressive measures .
In 14 days , 120,000 Sudeten Germans crossed into the Reich to escape the violence .
Henlein appealed to Hitler to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to put an end to any more murders resulting from Czech fanaticism.
” Hitler demanded the right to militarily occupy the territory to be annexed in four days .
He cited mounting turmoil there as justification .
Chamberlain was taken aback and bitter haggling followed .
The tension pervaded the next night ’ s conference , until an orderly interrupted with news that Benes had just declared general mobilization .
Another 1.2 million Czech reservists were returning to active duty .
Hitler thereupon reassured his English guest that he would keep his promise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ despite this unheard-of provocation.
” This relaxed the atmosphere , and the discussion assumed a friendlier tone .
At Munich , on September 28 , Chamberlain , Hitler , Daladier , and Mussolini finalized details of the annexation of the Sudetenland which Prague had agreed to on the 21st .
The incorporation of the Sudetenland into Germany began on October 1st , 1938 .
Hitler reaped an accolade in the London Times on October 2 for his concessions , and for reducing military measures to “ solely a symbolic partial-occupation.
” Benes resigned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ improve relations with Prague .
There remained 378,000 ethnic Germans in portions of Bohemia-Moravia not annexed by the Reich .
Hitler ordered on October 3 that this minority , while nurturing its cultural heritage , was to relinquish political activity toward autonomy , or returning its lands to German sovereignty .
He met with the new Czech foreign minister , Frantisek Chvalkovsky , on the 14th .
Hitler urged him to help “ normalize relations in a friendly way.
” In November , the legal department of the German Foreign Office submitted a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Though Hitler postponed the matter until January 1939 , the initiative indicates his interest in working with Prague .
His first gesture to the new regime was a generous policy toward Czech residents of the annexed Sudetenland .
The ethnic German minority residing in Prague-controlled sections of Bohemia-Moravia experienced the resentment of the Czechs after their defeat at Munich .
Thousands of Germans lost their jobs .
Many were unnecessarily watched by the police .
The government denied them and their families unemployment benefits .
Czech health insurance companies refused claims for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ confronted Chvalkovsky on January 21st , 1939 , and warned that “ no Great Power can tolerate a smaller neighboring country representing a perpetual threat in its flank.
” He stressed once more the necessity of improving relations .
The Munich Accord , engineered by the western democracies to save Czechoslovakia , was ironically her death sentence .
Its precedent for self-determination encouraged the country ’ s other captive minorities to follow the example of the Sudeten Germans .
Most prominent among them were the Slovaks .
The Czech army & militia had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Masaryk failed to deliver on his promise of regional autonomy .
Nor were Slovaks equally represented in public administration .
Hitler wished to remain neutral in the friction dividing Czechs & Slovaks .
On November 19 , the Reich ’ s Foreign Office directed its mission in Prague to watch events with reserve .
The German press received instructions to maintain a non-partisan attitude in reporting on tensions in Slovakia .
Hitler ordered , “ For the time being , no political talks with the Slovaks are opportune.
” Prague lost its grip @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Slovaks & Ruthenians established regional parliaments ; a right finally conceded by the central government as a step toward autonomy .
Delegates used their influence & authority to steer the regions more toward independence .
The new Czech president , Dr. Emil Hacha , resorted to the usual hammer ( forceful ) methods .
On March 6 , he deployed troops in the Carpato-Ukraine , and he appointed General Lev Prchala , as their commander , minister of the interior and finance .
In Slovakia , Hacha dissolved the regional parliament @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , under martial law and jailed 60 Slovakian politicians .
Czech soldiers & police transferred to Pressburg .
Hacha faced mounting chaos and the threat of open rebellion .
He appealed to Dr. Joseph Tiso , whom the Slovaks had elected their prime minister , to help restore order .
On March 13 , Tiso visited Berlin to ask Hitler how he would react to a Slovakian declaration of independence .
The Fuhrer replied only that he has no interest in occupying Slovakia , since the land had never belonged to the German @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He proclaimed national independence in parliament the next day .
Fearing that the Hungarian army would invade and annex Slovakia , Tiso asked for German protection .
Hitler replied , “ I acknowledge the receipt of your telegram and hereby assume the security of the Slovakian state.
” On this day , March 14 , Czechoslovakia ceased to exist as a republic .
Hacha requested an audience with Hitler .
He & Chvalkovsky arrived in Berlin by train the night of the 14th .
Since taking office , both men had worked to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Benes ’ s remaining associates , the anti-German Jewish-controlled press , and a public attitude tainted by nearly 20 years of Czech chauvinism promoted by Benes had sabotaged their efforts .
Prior to meeting Hitler , Hacha told Ribbentrop that he had come to “ place the fate of the Czech state in the hands of the Fuhrer.
” During their subsequent conversation , Hitler told Hacha that he was sending the German army across the frontier the following day .
He had ordered the OKW to prepare the operation three days @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to order the Czech army not to resist .
“ In this case your people still have good prospects for the future .
I will guarantee them autonomy far beyond what they could ever have dreamed of in the time of Austria.
” Hacha duly relayed instructions to his army chief , General Jan Syrovy , to stand down .
The German troops , who entered Czech territory at 6:00 a.m. on March 15 , had orders forbidding them to fire their weapons .
Advanced elements of the German army occupied the Morava-Ostrava @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Warsaw was about to exploit the momentary turmoil in Czechoslovakia to militarily seize the center and hold it for Poland .
Local Czech residents understood the German initiative and offered no resistance .
The Polish government was angry with Hitler for this rebuff of its territorial ambitions .
The Germans mollified ( appeased ) the initial hostility of the Czech people , largely thanks to the efforts of the NSV , Germany ’ s national social welfare organization who distributed RM 7,000,000 worth of food to the distressed population , and handed out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ German military authorities also arranged for the prompt restocking of grocery & department stores .
The Germans entered a land with 148,000 unemployed .
Demobilization of the Czech army substantially increased the number .
The Reich ’ s Ministry of Labor established offices in the newly created Czech Protectorate to recruit out-of-work persons for German industry .
During the first month of the occupation , 15,000 people took advantage of the opportunity and found jobs .
Over the next few months , unemployment continued to decline , and in June , the Czech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Holland , and several other nations to boost commerce .
At no time during the 1939-1945 war did the Germans induct Czech nationals into their armed forces .
Their country remained virtually unscathed throughout the devastating world conflict .
Hacha and his new cabinet resumed control of the government on April 27th , 1939 .
Czech remained the official language .
Administrative responsibilities included the interior , education , agriculture , justice , transportation , culture , social services , and public works .
Germany managed foreign policy & finance .
On June @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all Czech political prisoners in the Sudetenland and in their own country .
The Germans maintained a permanent force of 5,000 police officers throughout the Protectorate to combat sabotage & Communist subversion .
The Czech population experienced more autonomy , civil liberty and absence of discrimination under German hegemony than Tomas Masaryk & Benes had accorded the Sudeten German , Slovak , and Hungarian minorities during the earlier years of the republic .
The Germans confiscated most Czech army artillery , and integrated it into their own armed forces .
German troops briefly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ depots near the frontier .
The vast quantity of war materiel substantiated Hitler ’ s protest that Czechoslovakia , in a coalition with other European powers , represented a threat to Germany .
Quartermaster General , Eduard Wagner , wrote his wife on March 30 that the quantity of combat artillery discovered in this small country was “ downright frightening.
” The inventory included 1,582 aircraft , 2,175 field guns , 468 tanks , 501 anti-aircraft guns , 785 mortars , 43,856 machine guns , over a million rifles , three million artillery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specialty items such as bridge building equipment & searchlights , plus over a billion rifle rounds for the infantry .
It consisted of up-to-date , well-designed weaponry .
Modern production facilities such as the Skoda plant were expansive enough to simultaneously fill defense contracts for the USSR .
Ribbentrop sent Dr. Friedrich Berber to Prague with a special research staff to peruse documents in the Czech diplomatic archives dating from March 1938 to March 1939 .
The team examined records “ related to the English & French approach to the Czech question.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , assessed both in Prague and a few months earlier in Vienna , Berber ’ s analysis concluded that London had systematically intervened “ in the politics of these countries ” in order to “ maintain their independence and weaken Germany.
” The records also revealed that the British “ have acted in the same manner regarding Poland , ” the report deduced .
Hitler concluded from the findings that “ England wants war.
” Be sure to check out The Noble Protagonist ’ s 1,100 page E-book , “ The Battle to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vs. Jewish Supremacy ) .
Free E-Book available at : https : //archive.org/details/ @ nobleprotagonist

Note: This article is sourced from Richard Tedor’s book, “Hitler’s Revolution”. Noble has edited & condensed Tedor’s chapter (European Diplomacy – Czechoslovakia) on Hitler annexing the Sudetenland. Tedor’s book has 270 pages of text, supplemented by over 1000 footnotes and a bibliography of over 200 authors, mostly German. This book is still available on Amazon. Secure a copy now before Jewry has it “canceled”. https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-revolution-Richard-Tedor/dp/0988368226
For greater context, check out Kyle Hunt’s interview with Richard Tedor: http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/the-blitzkrieg-broadcast-w-kyle-hunt-4-11-14/
HITLER ANNEXED THE SUDETENLAND
A few months after the Anschluss, Germany annexed the Sudetenland, the ethnic German territory lining the periphery of western Czechoslovakia. The transfer of the region to German control provoked a serious war scare. The controversy traced its origin to the 1919 Versailles system.
During World War 1, Czechs served in the Austro-Hungarian army. Immigrants in London & Paris established the Czech Committee on November 14th, 1915. Two Czechs in exile, Tomas Masaryk & Eduard Benes, won the Entente’s endorsement for a future Czechoslovak state to be carved from portions of the Hapsburg realm. On October 18th, 1918, Czechs in Paris and in the USA claimed Czechoslovakian independence.
The new country had three components. Furthest east was Ruthenia, the population of which voluntarily joined Czechoslovakia. In the center was Slovakia, and many Slovaks wanted independence or at least considerable autonomy. The western part consisted of Bohemia & Moravia, where three million German Austrians dwelled with the Czechs. These Germans wished to remain with Austria.
Masaryk & Benes enjoyed prevailing influence in fashioning the postwar structure of Czechoslovakia. Masaryk persuaded (United States) President Wilson to alter his 14 points, which promised each nationality of Austria-Hungary the opportunity for autonomous development, to exclude Germans. Benes consciously underestimated the number of Sudeten Germans by nearly a million. He falsely claimed that they were not a unified minority, but lived in settlements integrated with Czechs.
Rich in raw materials & industry, the border territory offered Czechoslovakia a topographical defensive barrier against Germany. Benes based his deliberations more on economic & strategic advantages than on the natural rights of the German population.
Since the Paris peace conference continued until mid-1919, the German provinces were technically still part of Austria when the Austrian republic held its first democratic election that February 16. The Sudeten Germans prepared ballots to participate. The Czech army forcibly disrupted the arrangements. On March 4, thousands of Sudeten Germans organized peaceful demonstrations in their towns & villages to protest. Czech soldiers fired into the unarmed crowds, killing 54 Germans, 20 of them women.
The Allies finalized a compact with Czechoslovakia formally recognizing her statehood. Benes promised the Allies that his country would “give the Germans all rights they are entitled to… It will all in all be a very liberal regime.”
Denigrating the ethnic German population to “immigrant” status, the Czech government instituted a policy of “rapid de-Germanizing” in Bohemia and in the Sudetenland.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
Denigrating the ethnic German population to “immigrant” status, the Czech government instituted a policy of “rapid de-Germanizing” in Bohemia and in the Sudetenland.
Prague transferred military garrisons, railroad personnel, civil servants, prison populations and even hospital patients in large numbers to these ethnic German areas to manipulate the census figures. Czech officials tallied Czech transients as residents, even though “residency” seldom extended beyond two days.
Between 1923 and 1932, the state conducted 8,972 legal proceedings against dissident members of ethnic minorities. Defendants in sedition trials often included Sudeten Germans belonging to sports leagues, youth groups, singing societies, or backpacking clubs.
Prague established an immense “border zone” in which lived 85 percent of all Sudeten Germans, the entire Polish & Ruthenian populations, and 95 percent of the Hungarian colony. It came under permanent martial law. The army supervised the administration of factories, major construction projects, public works, the telephone service and forestry. Military authorities limited the civil liberties of citizens in the “border zone,” which comprised 56 percent of the entire country. This did not prevent Benes from lauding Czechoslovakia as a “lighthouse of democracy.”
Although during the first years of Hitler’s chancellorship, few among the German public were concerned with Czechoslovakia, for Hitler himself, the fate of the Sudetenland symbolized the tragedy of Germans under foreign rule.
The Sudeten people waged a dogged (tenacious), solitary struggle to maintain their German identity. Hitler made it his personal mission to recover the Sudetenland.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
The Sudeten people waged a dogged (tenacious), solitary struggle to maintain their German identity. Hitler made it his personal mission to recover the Sudetenland.
He introduced the topic during the Reichstag speech on February 20th, 1938. “As long as Germany was herself weak & defenseless, she had to simply accept the continuous persecution of German people along our borders… The interests of the German Reich also include the protection of those fellow Germans who are unable on their own, on our very frontier, to insure their right to basic human, political and ideological freedoms.”
Another circumstance turned Hitler’s attention to Czechoslovakia. Geographically, the country resembled a spear point penetrating deeply into Reich’s territory. This constituted a potential national security threat no responsible leader could ignore.
In January 1924, Paris & Prague concluded a “friendship pact” containing a military clause. This envisioned mutual general staff talks to prepare a joint defensive strategy in case of attack by a common enemy. The signatories followed with a formal military treaty in October 1925.
Only months before becoming president, Benes, as foreign minister, had concluded a military alliance with the Soviet Union. The pact provided for significant Czech-Russian cooperation.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
Benes replaced the 85-year old Masaryk as president of the republic in December 1935. Only months before becoming president, Benes, as foreign minister, had concluded a military alliance with the Soviet Union. The pact provided for significant Czech-Russian cooperation.
By the beginning of 1936, the Czechs had completed 32 air fields sited near the German frontier as bases for the rapidly expanding Red Air Force. They established depots to stockpile aviation fuel, aerial bombs and other war materiel.
The Red Army stationed troops in Bohemia & Moravia to undergo parachute training for a possible airborne assault against Germany. It transferred officers to the Czechoslovakian War Ministry in Prague and to local command centers. On February 12th, 1937, the London Daily Mail reported that immediately after ratification of the Prague-Moscow pact, Russian flight officers inspected Czech air bases & fuel dumps for their air force.
Prague was a converging point for Communist immigrants who had fled Germany in 1933, and Austria after the Anschluss. Sir Orme Sargent, of the British Foreign Office, called Czechoslovakia a “distribution center” for Stalin’s Comintern propaganda against Germany.
With France, Czechoslovakia and the USSR connected by military alliances since 1936, the Fuhrer felt boxed in.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
With France, Czechoslovakia and the USSR connected by military alliances since 1936, the Fuhrer felt boxed in. When he re-garrisoned the Rhineland on March 7 of that year, Benes offered France the support of the Czechoslovakian army for a joint invasion of Germany. During the months to follow, it swelled to a force of 1,453,000 men.
The Austrian Anschluss encouraged the Sudeten German Party, the SdP. Under the leadership of its founder, Konrad Henlein, it had already won 44 seats in the Czechoslovakian chamber of deputies and 23 in the senate, in the May 1935 elections. At an SdP assembly in Carlsbad on April 25th, 1938, Heinlein demanded autonomy for the ethnic German region. With 90 percent of Sudeten voters behind him, he had sufficient influence to compel the Czechs to enter negotiations with his party.
Henlein & Karl Frank had met with Hitler on March 28, but were unable to persuade the Fuhrer to pressure the Czechs. Joachim von Ribbentrop told the two guests that it was not Germany’s task “to offer individual suggestions as to what demands should be made of the Czechoslovakian government.” Berlin instructed the German embassy in Prague to limit support of the SdP to private talks with Czechoslovakian statesmen, “if the occasion presents itself.” The allegation of post-war historians that at the meeting, Hitler ordered Henlein to impose impossible terms in order to provoke the Czechs, is without substance.
The British government monitored the escalating controversy. The chiefs of staff from the Cabinet Committee on Foreign Policy came up with a report for the committee explaining that the British & French armies were too weak to go to war against Germany, Italy and Japan in an expanding conflict over Czechoslovakia. Chamberlain & Lord Halifax considered the military assessment “an extremely melancholy document.” Halifax summarized on April 27, “Neither we nor France were equipped for a war with Germany.”
France’s new Prime Minister, Eduard Daladier, visited London on April 28 to personally persuade Chamberlain to publicly guarantee English protection for Czechoslovakia. His British colleague retorted that Benes has never treated the German minority in the territories he annexed in a liberal manner as promised. Chamberlain declared that the people of England would never begin a war to prevent the nationalities of central Europe from expressing their will in a plebiscite (direct vote).
Chamberlain declared that the people of England would never begin a war to prevent the (Sudetenland German) nationalities of central Europe from expressing their will in a plebiscite (direct vote).” -Hitler’s Revolution book
That month, Hitler ordered General Wilhelm Keitel, chief of the Armed Forces Supreme Command (OKW), to prepare a study on the possible invasion of Czechoslovakia. He told Keitel that he did not at present intend to invade.
The guidelines, that Hitler furnished the OKW, emphasized that he would reject any scenario proposing a “strategic surprise attack out of the clear sky without grounds, or possibility of justification.” The Fuhrer described “an untenable situation for us should the major confrontation in the East with Bolshevism ever come… Czechoslovakia would then be the springboard for the Red Army and a landing place for its air force.”
On May 20, Benes called up over 150,000 military reservists to active duty, claiming that the measure was necessary because of a secret mobilization of the German armed forces. The French military envoy in Berlin cabled his government, saying that he saw no evidence of larger troop movements. Ambassador Neville Henderson sent two British army officers on his Berlin embassy staff on an extensive reconnaissance through the German border provinces of Saxony & Silesia. He wrote later, “They could discover no sign of unusual, or significant, Germany military activity, nor indeed could any of the military attaches of other foreign missions in Berlin, who were similarly engaged in scouring the country.”
Hitler, more or less, ignored Benes’ provocation (secret mobilization) and took no action, military or otherwise.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
Hitler, more or less, ignored Benes’ provocation and took no action, military or otherwise. The Jewish-controlled media in Paris, Prague, London and New York accepted Benes’ spurious allegations about German troop deployments. They published stories about how the Fuhrer had massed his divisions to bluff the Czechs into submitting to his demands. When Benes defiantly countered with his own partial mobilization, Hitler supposedly “backed down” and recalled his formations, a profound humiliation for a dictator who was “incapable of acting on his own threats.” His declarations regarding the Sudetenland were “nothing but hot air.”
The May crisis impressed Hitler with how hostile the western democracies & Czechoslovakia were toward Germany. Even the USSR had publicly reaffirmed its military obligation to the Czechs. He concluded that a peaceful settlement of the Sudeten issue was unlikely.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
The May crisis impressed Hitler with how hostile the western democracies & Czechoslovakia were toward Germany. Even the USSR had publicly reaffirmed its military obligation to the Czechs. He concluded that a peaceful settlement of the Sudeten issue was unlikely.
Hitler still possessed a diplomatic trump; democracy’s own arguments about human rights.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
Hitler still possessed a diplomatic trump; democracy’s own arguments about human rights. He publicly stated, “What the Germans insist on is the right to self-determination that every other nation also possesses… I demand that the oppression of the three-and-a-half million Germans in Czechoslovakia stop, and that in its place the free right to self-determination step in.” This was the Achilles heel (weakness) of the Fuhrer’s adversaries.
A plebiscite (direct vote) for Sudetenland independence also had pitfalls. Prague opposed the idea because the precedent would encourage the Slovaks, Hungarians, Poles and Ruthenians to demand one as well. Since these minorities suffered under-representation in government, and from oppression, the result would likely dissolve Czechoslovakia.
The French statesman, Daladier, proposed a compromise. Czechoslovakia would cede the Sudetenland to Germany without conducting a plebiscite. In this way, the Czech state would remain reasonably intact. Its importance to France, as Daladier explained to Chamberlain, was that “in any military operation there are wonderful possibilities for attacking Germany from Czechoslovak territory.”
French Aviation Minister, Pierre Cot, echoed this attitude. He believed that France & England needed Czechoslovakia, “because from this state the German economy and the German industry are most easily to be destroyed with bombs… Joint attacks of the French & Czech air forces can very quickly destroy all German production facilities.”
In August, Chamberlain proposed travelling to Germany to meet with Hitler to settle the Sudeten question together. He elicited a promise from his host that Germany would take no military action during the negotiations. On September 21, Benes unconditionally acquiesced to the Sudetenland plebiscite proposal.
During September, Chamberlain visited Germany three times. The first meeting with Hitler took place in Berchtesgaden on September 15. The session was cordial & constructive. Chamberlain approved Hitler’s proposals for the Sudeten areas to be annexed.
In Berlin, the German monitoring station in the Reich’s Ministry of Aviation eavesdropped on a telephone conversation between Benes and French Colonial Minister, Georges Mandel. Undermining Daladier, Mandel told Benes, “Paris & London have no right to dictate your attitude to you. If your territory is violated, you should not wait a second to issue orders to your army to defend the homeland… If you fire the first shot in self defense, the cannons of France, Great Britain and also Soviet Russia will begin firing on their own.”
The Germans also intercepted communications between Prague and its London & Paris embassies. The Benes government had instructed them to stall for time until the “war parties” in England and in France topple Chamberlain & Daladier.
On September 22, Hitler conferred (Munich Accord) with Chamberlain at the Hotel Dresen in Bad Godesberg. Reports of mounting unrest in the Sudetenland clouded the atmosphere. Henlein had formed an ethnic German militia, numbering nearly 40,000 men, which skirmished with Czech soldiers & police. The Czech government correspondingly implemented more repressive measures. In 14 days, 120,000 Sudeten Germans crossed into the Reich to escape the violence. Henlein appealed to Hitler to send in the German army, “to put an end to any more murders resulting from Czech fanaticism.”
Hitler demanded the right to militarily occupy the territory to be annexed in four days. He cited mounting turmoil there as justification. Chamberlain was taken aback and bitter haggling followed. The tension pervaded the next night’s conference, until an orderly interrupted with news that Benes had just declared general mobilization. Another 1.2 million Czech reservists were returning to active duty. Hitler thereupon reassured his English guest that he would keep his promise to withhold any military response, “despite this unheard-of provocation.” This relaxed the atmosphere, and the discussion assumed a friendlier tone.
At Munich, on September 28, Chamberlain, Hitler, Daladier, and Mussolini finalized details of the annexation of the Sudetenland which Prague had agreed to on the 21st.
The incorporation of the Sudetenland into Germany began on October 1st, 1938. Hitler reaped an accolade in the London Times on October 2 for his concessions, and for reducing military measures to “solely a symbolic partial-occupation.”
Benes resigned. Once gone, Germany attempted to improve relations with Prague. There remained 378,000 ethnic Germans in portions of Bohemia-Moravia not annexed by the Reich. Hitler ordered on October 3 that this minority, while nurturing its cultural heritage, was to relinquish political activity toward autonomy, or returning its lands to German sovereignty. He met with the new Czech foreign minister, Frantisek Chvalkovsky, on the 14th. Hitler urged him to help “normalize relations in a friendly way.”
In November, the legal department of the German Foreign Office submitted a draft for a Czech-German friendship treaty. Though Hitler postponed the matter until January 1939, the initiative indicates his interest in working with Prague. His first gesture to the new regime was a generous policy toward Czech residents of the annexed Sudetenland.
The ethnic German minority residing in Prague-controlled sections of Bohemia-Moravia experienced the resentment of the Czechs after their defeat at Munich. Thousands of Germans lost their jobs. Many were unnecessarily watched by the police. The government denied them and their families unemployment benefits. Czech health insurance companies refused claims for the German university clinic in Prague.
Hitler confronted Chvalkovsky on January 21st, 1939, and warned that “no Great Power can tolerate a smaller neighboring country representing a perpetual threat in its flank.” He stressed once more the necessity of improving relations.
The Munich Accord, engineered by the western democracies to save Czechoslovakia, was ironically her death sentence. Its precedent for self-determination encouraged the country’s other captive minorities to follow the example of the Sudeten Germans.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
The Munich Accord, engineered by the western democracies to save Czechoslovakia, was ironically her death sentence. Its precedent for self-determination encouraged the country’s other captive minorities to follow the example of the Sudeten Germans. Most prominent among them were the Slovaks. The Czech army & militia had occupied their land in 1919. Tomas Masaryk failed to deliver on his promise of regional autonomy. Nor were Slovaks equally represented in public administration.
Hitler wished to remain neutral in the friction dividing Czechs & Slovaks. On November 19, the Reich’s Foreign Office directed its mission in Prague to watch events with reserve. The German press received instructions to maintain a non-partisan attitude in reporting on tensions in Slovakia. Hitler ordered, “For the time being, no political talks with the Slovaks are opportune.”
Prague lost its grip on the disaffected minorities. In October, the Slovaks & Ruthenians established regional parliaments; a right finally conceded by the central government as a step toward autonomy. Delegates used their influence & authority to steer the regions more toward independence.
The new Czech president, Dr. Emil Hacha, resorted to the usual hammer (forceful) methods. On March 6, he deployed troops in the Carpato-Ukraine, and he appointed General Lev Prchala, as their commander, minister of the interior and finance.
In Slovakia, Hacha dissolved the regional parliament. He placed the capital, Pressburg, under martial law and jailed 60 Slovakian politicians. Czech soldiers & police transferred to Pressburg. Hacha faced mounting chaos and the threat of open rebellion. He appealed to Dr. Joseph Tiso, whom the Slovaks had elected their prime minister, to help restore order.
On March 13, Tiso visited Berlin to ask Hitler how he would react to a Slovakian declaration of independence. The Fuhrer replied only that he has no interest in occupying Slovakia, since the land had never belonged to the German Reich.
Fearing that the Hungarian army would invade and annex Slovakia, (Slovak prime minister) Tiso asked for German protection. Hitler replied, ‘I acknowledge the receipt of your telegram and hereby assume the security of the Slovakian state.”’ -Hitler’s Revolution book
Tiso returned to Pressburg. He proclaimed national independence in parliament the next day. Fearing that the Hungarian army would invade and annex Slovakia, Tiso asked for German protection. Hitler replied, “I acknowledge the receipt of your telegram and hereby assume the security of the Slovakian state.” On this day, March 14, Czechoslovakia ceased to exist as a republic.
Hacha requested an audience with Hitler. He & Chvalkovsky arrived in Berlin by train the night of the 14th. Since taking office, both men had worked to improve relations with Germany. The machinations of Benes’s remaining associates, the anti-German Jewish-controlled press, and a public attitude tainted by nearly 20 years of Czech chauvinism promoted by Benes had sabotaged their efforts. Prior to meeting Hitler, Hacha told Ribbentrop that he had come to “place the fate of the Czech state in the hands of the Fuhrer.”
During their subsequent conversation, Hitler told Hacha that he was sending the German army across the frontier the following day. He had ordered the OKW to prepare the operation three days earlier. The Fuhrer advised his guests to order the Czech army not to resist. “In this case your people still have good prospects for the future. I will guarantee them autonomy far beyond what they could ever have dreamed of in the time of Austria.” Hacha duly relayed instructions to his army chief, General Jan Syrovy, to stand down. The German troops, who entered Czech territory at 6:00 a.m. on March 15, had orders forbidding them to fire their weapons.
Advanced elements of the German army occupied the Morava-Ostrava industrial complex near the Polish frontier. Warsaw was about to exploit the momentary turmoil in Czechoslovakia to militarily seize the center and hold it for Poland. Local Czech residents understood the German initiative and offered no resistance. The Polish government was angry with Hitler for this rebuff of its territorial ambitions.
The Germans mollified (appeased) the initial hostility of the Czech people, largely thanks to the efforts of the NSV, Germany’s national social welfare organization who distributed RM 7,000,000 worth of food to the distressed population, and handed out RM 5,000,000 worth of clothing. The German military authorities also arranged for the prompt restocking of grocery & department stores.
The Germans entered a land with 148,000 unemployed. Demobilization of the Czech army substantially increased the number. The Reich’s Ministry of Labor established offices in the newly created Czech Protectorate to recruit out-of-work persons for German industry. During the first month of the occupation, 15,000 people took advantage of the opportunity and found jobs. Over the next few months, unemployment continued to decline, and in June, the Czech government negotiated trade agreements with Norway, Holland, and several other nations to boost commerce.
At no time during the 1939-1945 war did the Germans induct Czech nationals into their armed forces. Their country remained virtually unscathed throughout the devastating world conflict.
Hacha and his new cabinet resumed control of the government on April 27th, 1939. Czech remained the official language. Administrative responsibilities included the interior, education, agriculture, justice, transportation, culture, social services, and public works. Germany managed foreign policy & finance.
The Czech population experienced more autonomy, civil liberty and absence of discrimination under German hegemony than Tomas Masaryk & Benes had accorded the Sudeten German, Slovak, and Hungarian minorities during the earlier years of the republic.” -Hitler’s Revolution book
On June 7, Hitler declared general amnesty for all Czech political prisoners in the Sudetenland and in their own country. The Germans maintained a permanent force of 5,000 police officers throughout the Protectorate to combat sabotage & Communist subversion. The Czech population experienced more autonomy, civil liberty and absence of discrimination under German hegemony than Tomas Masaryk & Benes had accorded the Sudeten German, Slovak, and Hungarian minorities during the earlier years of the republic.
The Germans confiscated most Czech army artillery, and integrated it into their own armed forces. German troops briefly entered Slovakian territory to empty Czech military depots near the frontier. The vast quantity of war materiel substantiated Hitler’s protest that Czechoslovakia, in a coalition with other European powers, represented a threat to Germany.
The vast quantity of war materiel substantiated Hitler’s protest that Czechoslovakia, in a coalition with other European powers, represented a threat to Germany.” -Hitler’s Revolution
Quartermaster General, Eduard Wagner, wrote his wife on March 30 that the quantity of combat artillery discovered in this small country was “downright frightening.” The inventory included 1,582 aircraft, 2,175 field guns, 468 tanks, 501 anti-aircraft guns, 785 mortars, 43,856 machine guns, over a million rifles, three million artillery rounds, a considerable array of military specialty items such as bridge building equipment & searchlights, plus over a billion rifle rounds for the infantry. It consisted of up-to-date, well-designed weaponry. Modern production facilities such as the Skoda plant were expansive enough to simultaneously fill defense contracts for the USSR.
Ribbentrop sent Dr. Friedrich Berber to Prague with a special research staff to peruse documents in the Czech diplomatic archives dating from March 1938 to March 1939. The team examined records “related to the English & French approach to the Czech question.” Based on an abundance of documentary evidence, assessed both in Prague and a few months earlier in Vienna, Berber’s analysis concluded that London had systematically intervened “in the politics of these countries” in order to “maintain their independence and weaken Germany.” The records also revealed that the British “have acted in the same manner regarding Poland,” the report deduced. Hitler concluded from the findings that “England wants war.”
Based on an abundance of documentary evidence… Hitler concluded from the findings that ‘England wants war.”’ -Hitler’s Revolution book
Be sure to check out The Noble Protagonist’s 1,100 page E-book, “The Battle to preserve Western Civilization (European Folk Soul vs. Jewish Supremacy). Free E-Book available at: https://archive.org/details/@nobleprotagonist
Battle for the West (Website): http://www.battleforthewest.com/
Battle for the West (BitChute): https://www.bitchute.com/channel/65cDI4QdHali/
Share now!
Author: DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse. DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse.


renegadetribune--2020-03-17--Don’t Catch the Moronavirus!

Don’t Catch the Moronavirus!

Moronavirus is an infectious disease mainly affecting dupes and low-IQ individuals who have lost critical thinking abilities .
It turns @ @ @ @ @ carriers of disinformation .
Moronavirus appears to be highly contagious .
It is being spread @ @ @ @ @ , and it is running rampant through both the mainstream and alternative media .
Due @ @ @ @ @ “ truthers ” on the internet who appear to have the disease , it appears @ @ @ @ @ an engineered weapon of a highly complex parasite , and it is being spread by @ @ @ @ @ .
• Believing the bullshit being spewed from jewish media • Cheering as ZOG shuts @ @ @ @ @ the medical and pharmaceutical industry to help us stay healthy .
• Waiting for Israel @ @ @ @ @ have been working on for years .
If you or a loved one catches the @ @ @ @ @ the face with the number of Americans who die from CORONAry disease every year .
@ @ @ @ @ work , but it ’ s worth a shot anyway .

Moronavirus is an infectious disease mainly affecting dupes and low-IQ individuals who have lost critical thinking abilities. It turns otherwise decent people into dangerous carriers of disinformation.
Moronavirus appears to be highly contagious. It is being spread over TV and internet communications, and it is running rampant through both the mainstream and alternative media. Due to the the number of “truthers” on the internet who appear to have the disease, it appears that the Moronavirus is actually an engineered weapon of a highly complex parasite, and it is being spread by the parasite’s drones.
Symptoms include:
Believing the bullshit being spewed from jewish media
Cheering as ZOG shuts down everything.
Advocating for “social distancing” and self-quarantining.
Chastising and shaming people who don’t agree.
Trusting the medical and pharmaceutical industry to help us stay healthy.
Waiting for Israel to release the vaccine they have been working on for years.
Thinking a surgical mask is a life saver.
Selective amnesia regarding recent “pandemics”.
If you or a loved one catches the Moronavirus, slap them across the face with the number of Americans who die from CORONAry disease every year. It probably won’t work, but it’s worth a shot anyway.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-03-17--St. Patrick’s Day Is Based On The Roman Celebration of Liberalia

In the ancient Roman world March 17th was a day for celebrating Liber Pater and getting really wasted .
Pater ’ s Day was not all that different than today ’ s Patrick ’ s Day .
In ancient Roman religion and mythology , Liber /ˈlaɪbər/ LY-bər , Latin : [ ˈliːbɛr ] ; “ the free one ” ) , also known as Liber Pater ( “ the free Father ” ) , was a god of viticulture and wine , fertility and freedom .
He was a patron deity of Rome ’ s plebeians and was part of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Liberalia ( March 17 ) became associated with free speech and the rights attached to coming of age .
His cult and functions were increasingly associated with Romanised forms of the Greek Dionysus/Bacchus , whose mythology he came to share .
( Wikipedia ) Apparently Liberalia was a phallic festival , in which a large mock penis was carried around .
St. Augustine , declaiming against the open obscenities of the Roman festival of the Liberalia , informs us that an enormous phallus was carried in a magnificent chariot into the middle of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ great ceremony , where the most respectable matron advanced and placed a garland of flowers “ on this obscene figure ; ” and this , he says : was done to appease the god , and “ to obtain an abundant harvest , and remove enchantments from the land.
” ( The Worship of the Generative Powers by Thomas Wright [ 1865 ] ) Let ’ s learn a little more about this festival .
The day was celebrated with ribald songs , processions of priests and elder priestesses – adorned with Ivy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hung on trees .
Young Roman boys were given a lucky charm by their parents called a bulla praetexta , generally made of gold or leather , which was hung around their necks to ward off evil spirits .
When boys reached puberty ( usually aged 14-16 ) this amulet would be removed and often placed on an altar dedicated to the Lares ( Deities protecting the household and family , image right shows a statue of one of the Lares holdng a cornucopia ) , together with either a lock of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his first shave .
Subsequently mothers ’ would retrieve them and keep them safe out of superstition , and they would be used for protection if the son was ever in public office or in a role involving any danger .
Later in the ceremony the rites of passsage would continue with the fathers ’ taking their sons to the Forum to be presented as adult citizens , now with full adult rites including eligibilty to vote ( if he met the statutory requirements of the time ) and the authority to wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as to marry .
( Harmony Healing ) Young boys were given “ lucky charms ” on this day ?
Hmm .
Priests and priestesses were adorned with ivy , which reminds me of the Irish shamrock .
Apparently Liberalia was all about getting really drunk , singing songs , and unashamedly engaging in sexual intercourse .
Having seen a number of St. Patrick ’ s Days in my life , I ’ d say this sounds like a match .
It is pretty interesting we have been unknowingly celebrating an ancient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It should also be mentioned that the Romans massacred millions of Celts before subjugating them .
Neither St. Patrick ’ s Day or Liber Pater ’ s Day have anything to do with the ancient spirituality of our people .
They were introduced by foreign powers and do nothing to further the Celtic people .
By the way , in Egypt the 17th day of the third month ( March 17th for us ) was the celebration of Osiris , believed to be the day he died .
He was the god @ @ @ @ @ @ @ depicted as being green .
Just a coincidence ?
I think not !

In the ancient Roman world March 17th was a day for celebrating Liber Pater and getting really wasted. Pater’s Day was not all that different than today’s Patrick’s Day.
In ancient Roman religion and mythology, Liber /ˈlaɪbər/ LY-bər, Latin: [ˈliːbɛr]; “the free one”), also known as Liber Pater (“the free Father”), was a god of viticulture and wine, fertility and freedom. He was a patron deity of Rome’s plebeians and was part of their Aventine Triad. His festival of Liberalia (March 17) became associated with free speech and the rights attached to coming of age. His cult and functions were increasingly associated with Romanised forms of the Greek Dionysus/Bacchus, whose mythology he came to share. (Wikipedia)
Apparently Liberalia was a phallic festival, in which a large mock penis was carried around.
St. Augustine, declaiming against the open obscenities of the Roman festival of the Liberalia, informs us that an enormous phallus was carried in a magnificent chariot into the middle of the public place of the town with great ceremony, where the most respectable matron advanced and placed a garland of flowers “on this obscene figure;” and this, he says: was done to appease the god, and “to obtain an abundant harvest, and remove enchantments from the land.” (The Worship of the Generative Powers by Thomas Wright [1865])
Let’s learn a little more about this festival.
The day was celebrated with ribald songs, processions of priests and elder priestesses – adorned with Ivy – and sacrifices, with masks being hung on trees. Young Roman boys were given a lucky charm by their parents called a bulla praetexta, generally made of gold or leather, which was hung around their necks to ward off evil spirits. When boys reached puberty (usually aged 14-16) this amulet would be removed and often placed on an altar dedicated to the Lares (Deities protecting the household and family, image right shows a statue of one of the Lares holdng a cornucopia), together with either a lock of the boy’s hair or stubble from his first shave. Subsequently mothers’ would retrieve them and keep them safe out of superstition, and they would be used for protection if the son was ever in public office or in a role involving any danger. Later in the ceremony the rites of passsage would continue with the fathers’ taking their sons to the Forum to be presented as adult citizens, now with full adult rites including eligibilty to vote (if he met the statutory requirements of the time) and the authority to wear the pure white adult toga, as well as to marry. (Harmony Healing)
Young boys were given “lucky charms” on this day? Hmm.
Priests and priestesses were adorned with ivy, which reminds me of the Irish shamrock.
Apparently Liberalia was all about getting really drunk, singing songs, and unashamedly engaging in sexual intercourse. Having seen a number of St. Patrick’s Days in my life, I’d say this sounds like a match.
It is pretty interesting we have been unknowingly celebrating an ancient Roman holiday and not even knowing it. It should also be mentioned that the Romans massacred millions of Celts before subjugating them.
Neither St. Patrick’s Day or Liber Pater’s Day have anything to do with the ancient spirituality of our people. They were introduced by foreign powers and do nothing to further the Celtic people.
By the way, in Egypt the 17th day of the third month (March 17th for us) was the celebration of Osiris, believed to be the day he died. He was the god of agriculture and beer, and always depicted as being green. Just a coincidence? I think not!
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-03-17--This Bank Bailout is Far Worse Than 2008, But No One Can Protest!

Do you guys remember back in 2008 when George W. Bush bailed out the “ too big to fail ” banks ?
CEOs and other top executives took huge bonuses while the working class of America suffered .
People were expected to shut up and take Bush ’ s pitiful “ stimulus ” check .
More money was “ injected ” during Obama ’ s reign , but most people did not comprehend the full-scale theft of the American people .
Most people think that the big bank bailout was the $ 700 billion that the treasury department used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in September of 2008 .
But this is a long way from the truth because the bailout is still ongoing .
The Special Inspector General for TARP summary of the bailout says that the total commitment of government is $ 16.8 trillion dollars with the $ 4.6 trillion already paid out .
Yes , it was trillions not billions and the banks are now larger and still too big to fail.
” ( Forbes , 2015 ) Some controlled opposition movements like Occupy Wall Street came into being in 2011 in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the struggling American people .
The demonstrations were quite popular for a significant amount of time , then everyone went home and nothing was really accomplished .
Trump ’ s administration has been flooding the banks with monetary aid and the recent $ 1.5 trillion is being heralded as a heroic move by some , as a way for Trump to try to shore up “ our ” economic woes , though some people can obviously see we are getting screwed here .
The financial collapse was not caused by a random @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ruling elite .
This is why so many CEOs jumped ship and liquidated their stocks at all time highs , a month before the stock market collapsed , leaving the average American with no work , a devalued dollar , and a destroyed retirement fund .
We ’ re not really supposed to focus on any of that because… WE ’ RE ALL GON NA DIE !
OMG , the Coronavirus is a pandemic !
“ Conveniently ” we are not even legally allowed to protest against the banking scam unfolding as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wall Street .
Hell , we can not even occupy anywhere other than our homes , since medical martial law is rapidly developing across the world .

Do you guys remember back in 2008 when George W. Bush bailed out the “too big to fail” banks?
President George W. Bush signed the $700 billion bank bailout bill on October 3, 2008. The official name was the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson had asked Congress to approve a $700 billion bailout to buy mortgage-backed securities that were in danger of defaulting. (The Balance)
CEOs and other top executives took huge bonuses while the working class of America suffered. People were expected to shut up and take Bush’s pitiful “stimulus” check.
More money was “injected” during Obama’s reign, but most people did not comprehend the full-scale theft of the American people.
Most people think that the big bank bailout was the $700 billion that the treasury department used to save the banks during the financial crash in September of 2008. But this is a long way from the truth because the bailout is still ongoing. The Special Inspector General for TARP summary of the bailout says that the total commitment of government is $16.8 trillion dollars with the $4.6 trillion already paid out. Yes, it was trillions not billions and the banks are now larger and still too big to fail.” (Forbes, 2015)
Some controlled opposition movements like Occupy Wall Street came into being in 2011 in order to channel and eventually diffuse the growing frustration of the struggling American people. The demonstrations were quite popular for a significant amount of time, then everyone went home and nothing was really accomplished.
Trump’s administration has been flooding the banks with monetary aid and the recent $1.5 trillion is being heralded as a heroic move by some, as a way for Trump to try to shore up “our” economic woes, though some people can obviously see we are getting screwed here.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/1-5-trillion-fed-injection-sparks-outrage-among-struggling-workers/
The financial collapse was not caused by a random coronavirus, but foreseen and engineered by the ruling elite. This is why so many CEOs jumped ship and liquidated their stocks at all time highs, a month before the stock market collapsed, leaving the average American with no work, a devalued dollar, and a destroyed retirement fund.
We’re not really supposed to focus on any of that because… WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE! OMG, the Coronavirus is a pandemic!
“Conveniently” we are not even legally allowed to protest against the banking scam unfolding as we speak. We cannot occupy Wall Street. Hell, we cannot even occupy anywhere other than our homes, since medical martial law is rapidly developing across the world.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-03-16--Special Treatment in Auschwitz: Origin and Meaning of a Term

In the anthology Nazi Mass Murder , Adalbert Rückerl writes of the meaning of the term “ special treatment ” : “ In all areas involving the physical extermination of people , the code word was ‘ special treatment ’ – Sonderbehandlung , sometimes shortened on the initials SB.
” It can not be disputed that in numerous documents of the Third Reich , the term “ special treatment ” is , in fact , synonymous with execution or liquidation , but this does not mean that the meaning of this term always and exclusively had this significance .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in which “ special treatment ” was by no means equivalent to killing , as well as those , in which the word described privileged treatment .
Moreover , we have at our disposal a great number of important documents , in which the expression “ special treatment ” ( as well as other alleged “ code words ” like “ special measures , ” “ special operation , ” or “ special unit ” ) exhibit an entire palette of varied meanings , which nonetheless refer to perfectly normal aspects of camp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ single instance indicate the murder of human beings .
These documents are for the most part unknown to researchers , and those already well known have been and are given distorted interpretations by the representatives of the official historiography .
In the present study these documents are made accessible to the reader and analyzed in their historical context , and cross-references are made .
In doing so , we show what the documents actually say and not what the “ decipherment ” and mechanistic interpretation of supposed “ code words ” allegedly reveal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” was by no means a “ code word , ” behind which the unspeakable was concealed , but rather a bureaucratic concept , which – depending on the context of its use – designated entirely different things , all the way from liquidation to preferred treatment .
This fact refutes the interpretation advocated by the official historiography , according to which “ special treatment ” is supposed to have always been synonymous with murder , with no ifs , ands , or buts .
The results of the present study of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in Auschwitz , it should be well understood , pertain solely to the theme dealt with here .
They do not extend to the existing uncontested documents – clearly not originating from Auschwitz – in which the term “ special treatment ” actually did refer to executions .
Yet even those documents can not alter in any way the validity of the conclusions presented here .
During the investigations leading to the two Polish Auschwitz trials conducted directly after the war , the term “ special treatment ” ( Sonderbehandlung ) as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as “ special operation ” ( Sonderaktion ) , “ special measure ” ( Sondermaßnahme ) etc.
, were systematically interpreted as “ code words ” for the gassing of human beings .
By the end of 1946 , the Główna Komisja badania zbrodni niemieckich w Polsce ( Chief Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes in Poland ) had developed the orthodox interpretation of this term that was gradually to become an unshakeable cornerstone of the orthodox narrative of Auschwitz .
Therefore , in order to deduce a criminal meaning from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sonder- ) , the Polish commission began its “ decoding ” with the assumption that homicidal gas chambers were located in the crematoria of Birkenau .
Later , the official historiography switched to the converse argument : Starting from the premise that a criminal meaning was inherent in these terms , it derived from this the existence of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz .
In this way , a pseudo-logical circular reasoning came into being which leads from expressions beginning with “ special ” to homicidal gas chambers , and returns back from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ special ” terms .
In this vicious circle orthodox historiography has been trapped for decades .
The term “ special unit ” ( Sonderkommando ) also belongs into that same “ logical ” framework .
Orthodox historians always used this term to refer exclusively to the staff of the crematoria in order to create the illusion that criminal activities took place in these facilities .
The opening of the Moscow Archives , despite the enormous mass of documents made accessible to researchers thereby , resulted only in insignificant corrections to the arguments developed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Jean Claude Pressac , who was the first to study the documents of the Central Construction Office of Auschwitz , emphatically maintained : “ The extraordinary abundance of materials that the Soviet Army brought back permits an almost seamless reconstruction of the criminals ’ inventiveness.
” and he adds that the documentation now available makes possible “ an historical reconstruction that does without oral or written eyewitness reports , which are ultimately fallible and become ever less accurate with time.
” But in Pressac ’ s “ historical reconstruction , ” his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proves to be without documentary basis .
In this respect , Pressac ’ s method manifests enormous deficiencies .
The same applies even more to Robert Jan van Pelt , author of a 438-page expert report dedicated to a large extent to the Auschwitz camp ( The Pelt Report ) .
It was submitted during the libel suit of British historian David Irving against Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books ( which ended on April 11 , 2000 , with Irving ’ s defeat ) .
This expert report was published as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and expanded form .
In it , van Pelt presented a sketchy reprise of Pressac ’ s theses , and with regard to the topic at hand , as well as with regard to many other issues , he remained well below the quality level of the French scholar ’ s exposition .
According to orthodox historiography , the beginning of special treatment in Auschwitz coincided with the first “ selection , ” which took place on July 4 , 1942 .
Under this date the Auschwitz Chronicle notes : “ For the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out a selection among the jews sent to the camp ; these are in an RSHA transport from Slovakia .
During the selection , 264 men from the transport are chosen as able-bodied and admitted to the camp as registered prisoners .
They receive Nos .
44727–44990 .
In addition , 108 women are selected and given Nos .
8389–8496 .
The rest of the people are taken to the bunker and killed with gas.
” This interpretation leads to another circular reasoning , since unregistered prisoners can be regarded as “ gassed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the existence of extermination facilities in the Bunkers of Birkenau , based upon mere eyewitness statements .
The new documentation mentioned by Pressac allows a complete picture to be drawn of the facilities in Auschwitz which were finished in the first half of 1942 , and it permits us to verify how well-founded claims about the homicidal function of these bunkers really are .
However , instead of undertaking this verification , Pressac uncritically parroted the interpretation promoted by orthodox historiography and even attempted to round it out by referring to a document @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” appears , but which has nothing to do with the so-called bunkers .
I shall examine this question more closely in Chapter 4 of Part One .
This is most certainly not the only weak point of Pressac ’ s method .
In his “ historical reconstruction , ” he never even attempted to study the great abundance of recently accessible documents in which expressions beginning with “ special ” occur .
Despite these serious weaknesses , Pressac was the most renowned representative of orthodox historiography concerning Auschwitz .
For this reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a starting point for my investigation .
In 2014 , the Auschwitz Museum published an important book containing 74 documents , many of which are pertinent to the present study and have previously been unknown or ignored .
I have dealt with this collection in detail in my book Curated Lies : The Auschwitz Museum ’ s Misrepresentations , Distortions and Deceptions , so where necessary , I will limit myself here to pointing out these new documents and referring to Curated Lies for further study .
The purpose of the present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hypothesis proposed by the Polish postwar commission , which was later generally appropriated by orthodox historiography , as well as the emendations made to it by Pressac .
The problem of mass gassing of jews in Auschwitz is not the immediate subject of this study , since answering the question of whether there were homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz is not the aim here , but rather whether or not expressions beginning with “ special ” refer to possibly existing homicidal gas chambers or to mass gassings .
Since the analysis I proposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem of the prisoners deported to Auschwitz , but not registered there , will merely be treated in passing , as I have discussed this topic in yet another dedicated study which in a way complements the present study .
After all , the documents cited in Chapters 1 and 7 of Part Two incontestably prove that in August and September of 1942 the jews deported to Auschwitz were shipped farther to the east and that one of their destinations was a camp in Russia .
The historical and documentary analysis presented in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the question raised at the beginning : The prefix “ special , ” which occurs in the documents examined , referred to various aspects of life in the Auschwitz camp : – the disinfestation and storage of personal effects taken from the prisoners ; – the delousing facility of Birkenau ( the Central Sauna ) ; – the Zyklon B deliveries , which were shipped for the purpose of disinfestation ; – the prisoners ’ hospital planned for Sector BIII of the Birkenau camp ; – the classification of those suitable for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instance did this prefix have a criminal meaning .
For this reason the “ deciphering ” performed by orthodox Holocaust historiography is historically and documentarily untenable .
Thus the vicious circle of the orthodox historians has been broken , and the claim that expressions in documents pertaining to the Auschwitz camp which contain the prefix “ special ” belonged to a “ code language ” concealing unspeakable atrocities is exposed for what it really is : a crude ploy meant to conjure up with mere words the kind of evidence that these historians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been quite unable to provide and in fact continue to be unable to provide .
The documentary collection The Beginnings of the Extermination of jews in KL Auschwitz in the Light of the Source Materials , published in 2014 by the Auschwitz Museum , contains the result of years of research by the historians at that museum , who carefully perused all the documents stored in their archive .
In a certain way , this work is an official confirmation for the fact that no document exists which in any way refers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Birkenau , to the alleged homicidal gas chambers of the crematoria , or in general to any form of killings of registered or unregistered inmates at Auschwitz .

By Carlo Mattogno
In the anthology Nazi Mass Murder, Adalbert Rückerl writes of the meaning of the term “special treatment”:
“In all areas involving the physical extermination of people, the code word was ‘special treatment’ – Sonderbehandlung, sometimes shortened on the initials SB.”
It cannot be disputed that in numerous documents of the Third Reich, the term “special treatment” is, in fact, synonymous with execution or liquidation, but this does not mean that the meaning of this term always and exclusively had this significance. We have available to us other documents, in which “special treatment” was by no means equivalent to killing, as well as those, in which the word described privileged treatment.
Moreover, we have at our disposal a great number of important documents, in which the expression “special treatment” (as well as other alleged “code words” like “special measures,” “special operation,” or “special unit”) exhibit an entire palette of varied meanings, which nonetheless refer to perfectly normal aspects of camp life in Auschwitz and which in no single instance indicate the murder of human beings. These documents are for the most part unknown to researchers, and those already well known have been and are given distorted interpretations by the representatives of the official historiography.
In the present study these documents are made accessible to the reader and analyzed in their historical context, and cross-references are made. In doing so, we show what the documents actually say and not what the “decipherment” and mechanistic interpretation of supposed “code words” allegedly reveal. In reality, “special treatment” was by no means a “code word,” behind which the unspeakable was concealed, but rather a bureaucratic concept, which – depending on the context of its use – designated entirely different things, all the way from liquidation to preferred treatment. This fact refutes the interpretation advocated by the official historiography, according to which “special treatment” is supposed to have always been synonymous with murder, with no ifs, ands, or buts.
The results of the present study of the origin and meaning of “special treatment” in Auschwitz, it should be well understood, pertain solely to the theme dealt with here. They do not extend to the existing uncontested documents – clearly not originating from Auschwitz – in which the term “special treatment” actually did refer to executions. Yet even those documents cannot alter in any way the validity of the conclusions presented here.
During the investigations leading to the two Polish Auschwitz trials conducted directly after the war, the term “special treatment” (Sonderbehandlung) as well as expressions related to it, such as “special operation” (Sonderaktion), “special measure” (Sondermaßnahme) etc., were systematically interpreted as “code words” for the gassing of human beings. By the end of 1946, the Główna Komisja badania zbrodni niemieckich w Polsce (Chief Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes in Poland) had developed the orthodox interpretation of this term that was gradually to become an unshakeable cornerstone of the orthodox narrative of Auschwitz.
Therefore, in order to deduce a criminal meaning from expressions beginning with “special” (Sonder-), the Polish commission began its “decoding” with the assumption that homicidal gas chambers were located in the crematoria of Birkenau. Later, the official historiography switched to the converse argument: Starting from the premise that a criminal meaning was inherent in these terms, it derived from this the existence of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. In this way, a pseudo-logical circular reasoning came into being which leads from expressions beginning with “special” to homicidal gas chambers, and returns back from these gas chambers to the pertinent “special” terms. In this vicious circle orthodox historiography has been trapped for decades. The term “special unit” (Sonderkommando) also belongs into that same “logical” framework. Orthodox historians always used this term to refer exclusively to the staff of the crematoria in order to create the illusion that criminal activities took place in these facilities.
The opening of the Moscow Archives, despite the enormous mass of documents made accessible to researchers thereby, resulted only in insignificant corrections to the arguments developed by the Poles right after the war. Jean Claude Pressac, who was the first to study the documents of the Central Construction Office of Auschwitz, emphatically maintained:
“The extraordinary abundance of materials that the Soviet Army brought back permits an almost seamless reconstruction of the criminals’ inventiveness.”
and he adds that the documentation now available makes possible
“an historical reconstruction that does without oral or written eyewitness reports, which are ultimately fallible and become ever less accurate with time.”
But in Pressac’s “historical reconstruction,” his interpretation of the special treatment in Auschwitz proves to be without documentary basis. In this respect, Pressac’s method manifests enormous deficiencies.
The same applies even more to Robert Jan van Pelt, author of a 438-page expert report dedicated to a large extent to the Auschwitz camp (The Pelt Report). It was submitted during the libel suit of British historian David Irving against Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books (which ended on April 11, 2000, with Irving’s defeat). This expert report was published as a book in 2002 in a revised and expanded form. In it, van Pelt presented a sketchy reprise of Pressac’s theses, and with regard to the topic at hand, as well as with regard to many other issues, he remained well below the quality level of the French scholar’s exposition.
According to orthodox historiography, the beginning of special treatment in Auschwitz coincided with the first “selection,” which took place on July 4, 1942. Under this date the Auschwitz Chronicle notes:
“For the first time, the camp administration carries out a selection among the jews sent to the camp; these are in an RSHA transport from Slovakia. During the selection, 264 men from the transport are chosen as able-bodied and admitted to the camp as registered prisoners. They receive Nos. 44727–44990. In addition, 108 women are selected and given Nos. 8389–8496. The rest of the people are taken to the bunker and killed with gas.”
This interpretation leads to another circular reasoning, since unregistered prisoners can be regarded as “gassed” only if one assumes a priori the existence of extermination facilities in the Bunkers of Birkenau, based upon mere eyewitness statements.
The new documentation mentioned by Pressac allows a complete picture to be drawn of the facilities in Auschwitz which were finished in the first half of 1942, and it permits us to verify how well-founded claims about the homicidal function of these bunkers really are. However, instead of undertaking this verification, Pressac uncritically parroted the interpretation promoted by orthodox historiography and even attempted to round it out by referring to a document in which the expression “special treatment” appears, but which has nothing to do with the so-called bunkers. I shall examine this question more closely in Chapter 4 of Part One.
This is most certainly not the only weak point of Pressac’s method. In his “historical reconstruction,” he never even attempted to study the great abundance of recently accessible documents in which expressions beginning with “special” occur. Despite these serious weaknesses, Pressac was the most renowned representative of orthodox historiography concerning Auschwitz. For this reason it seemed appropriate to take his conclusions as a starting point for my investigation.
In 2014, the Auschwitz Museum published an important book containing 74 documents, many of which are pertinent to the present study and have previously been unknown or ignored. I have dealt with this collection in detail in my book Curated Lies: The Auschwitz Museum’s Misrepresentations, Distortions and Deceptions, so where necessary, I will limit myself here to pointing out these new documents and referring to Curated Lies for further study.
The purpose of the present study is the documentary examination of the hypothesis proposed by the Polish postwar commission, which was later generally appropriated by orthodox historiography, as well as the emendations made to it by Pressac. The problem of mass gassing of jews in Auschwitz is not the immediate subject of this study, since answering the question of whether there were homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz is not the aim here, but rather whether or not expressions beginning with “special” refer to possibly existing homicidal gas chambers or to mass gassings.
Since the analysis I proposed is of a documentary nature, the problem of the prisoners deported to Auschwitz, but not registered there, will merely be treated in passing, as I have discussed this topic in yet another dedicated study which in a way complements the present study. After all, the documents cited in Chapters 1 and 7 of Part Two incontestably prove that in August and September of 1942 the jews deported to Auschwitz were shipped farther to the east and that one of their destinations was a camp in Russia.
The historical and documentary analysis presented in the present study enables a definitive answer to the question raised at the beginning: The prefix “special,” which occurs in the documents examined, referred to various aspects of life in the Auschwitz camp:
– the disinfestation and storage of personal effects taken from the prisoners;
– the delousing facility of Birkenau (the Central Sauna);
– the Zyklon B deliveries, which were shipped for the purpose of disinfestation;
– the prisoners’ hospital planned for Sector BIII of the Birkenau camp;
– the reception of deportees;
– the classification of those suitable for labor.
But in not a single instance did this prefix have a criminal meaning. For this reason the “deciphering” performed by orthodox Holocaust historiography is historically and documentarily untenable. Thus the vicious circle of the orthodox historians has been broken, and the claim that expressions in documents pertaining to the Auschwitz camp which contain the prefix “special” belonged to a “code language” concealing unspeakable atrocities is exposed for what it really is: a crude ploy meant to conjure up with mere words the kind of evidence that these historians should long since have provided, yet have been quite unable to provide and in fact continue to be unable to provide.
The documentary collection The Beginnings of the Extermination of jews in KL Auschwitz in the Light of the Source Materials, published in 2014 by the Auschwitz Museum, contains the result of years of research by the historians at that museum, who carefully perused all the documents stored in their archive. In a certain way, this work is an official confirmation for the fact that no document exists which in any way refers to the alleged gassing “bunkers” at Birkenau, to the alleged homicidal gas chambers of the crematoria, or in general to any form of killings of registered or unregistered inmates at Auschwitz.
file:///home/chronos/u-17202e3b10259cac245ef0fdffb1b575fcde4624/MyFiles/Downloads/Holohoax%20Handbooks/Vol10SpecialTreatmentInAuschwitz.pdf
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician