renegadetribune--2020-12-13--Ben & Jerry’s Unveils Super-Woke Kaepernick Ice Cream “To Dismantle Systems Of Oppression”

Ice cream brand Ben & Jerry ’ s has dived deeper into woke capitalism by partnering with social activist Colin Kaepernick to market a frozen dessert treat that promotes racial activism .
The former NFL star was honored Thursday by the Vermont ice-cream maker that has long promoted its activism – on climate change , LGBTQ rights , GMO labeling , and even demanding that the UK accept more illegal boat migrants , with a new flavor called “ Change the Whirled , ” which is a vegan ice cream blended with caramel and cookies , expected to hit store @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is touted as “ the flavor that ’ s supporting the fight to dismantle systems of oppression and empower black and brown people.
” The packaging for the social justice ice cream features Kaepernick ’ s illustration , with a catchy slogan that reads “ I know my rights.
” In a press release , Kaepernick said that he ’ s “ honored to partner with Ben & Jerry ’ s on Change the Whirled.
” He continued : “ Their commitment to challenging the anti-Black roots of policing in the United States @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Black and Brown communities .
My hope is that this partnership will amplify calls to defund and abolish the police and to invest in futures that can make us safer , healthier , and truly free.
” Kaepernick also said the venture will “ serve up joy on the journey to justice.
” A portion of the proceeds from each pint sold will be transferred to his Know Your Rights Camp Foundation .
As we noted above , Ben & Jerry ’ s has been woke for years .
So it comes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been a target of boycott campaigns because of such actions as calling for the release of an alleged cop killer and using flavor names deemed offensive by conservatives , ” said RT News .
Conservatives took to social media Thursday after it was made public that new social justice ice cream would hit store shelves next year .
One Conservatives tweeted : “ You know what to do , Patriots … Time to boycott Ben & Jerry ’ s. ” And the tweet of the day : “ Ahhh yes .
Social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ racism everywhere .
Smh ” Will they be next to go broke after going woke ?
This article originally appeared on Zero Hedge .

By Tyler Durden
Ice cream brand Ben & Jerry’s has dived deeper into woke capitalism by partnering with social activist Colin Kaepernick to market a frozen dessert treat that promotes racial activism.
The former NFL star was honored Thursday by the Vermont ice-cream maker that has long promoted its activism – on climate change, LGBTQ rights, GMO labeling, and even demanding that the UK accept more illegal boat migrants, with a new flavor called “Change the Whirled,” which is a vegan ice cream blended with caramel and cookies, expected to hit store shelves in 2021.
We’ve teamed up with @Kaepernick7! Introducing Change the Whirled Non-Dairy, the flavor that's supporting the fight to dismantle systems of oppression and empower Black and Brown people. Coming to freezers in 2021! Learn more: https://t.co/7c0Se2vut4 pic.twitter.com/LY90ObEwCj — Ben & Jerry's (@benandjerrys) December 10, 2020
Change the Whirled is touted as “the flavor that’s supporting the fight to dismantle systems of oppression and empower black and brown people.”
The packaging for the social justice ice cream features Kaepernick’s illustration, with a catchy slogan that reads “I know my rights.”
In a press release, Kaepernick said that he’s “honored to partner with Ben & Jerry’s on Change the Whirled.”
He continued: “Their commitment to challenging the anti-Black roots of policing in the United States demonstrates a material concern for the wellbeing of Black and Brown communities. My hope is that this partnership will amplify calls to defund and abolish the police and to invest in futures that can make us safer, healthier, and truly free.”
Kaepernick also said the venture will “serve up joy on the journey to justice.” A portion of the proceeds from each pint sold will be transferred to his Know Your Rights Camp Foundation.
As we noted above, Ben & Jerry’s has been woke for years. So it comes as no surprise “the company itself has been a target of boycott campaigns because of such actions as calling for the release of an alleged cop killer and using flavor names deemed offensive by conservatives,” said RT News.
Conservatives took to social media Thursday after it was made public that new social justice ice cream would hit store shelves next year.
“This is where we’re now at in America,” sports journalist David Hookstead tweeted. “If you refuse to stand for the anthem, are terrible at playing quarterback and lose your job, you get honored with a non-dairy and vegan dessert.”
Ben & Jerry's is releasing a new flavor in honor of Colin Kaepernick. This is where we're now at in America. If you refuse to stand for the anthem, are terrible at playign quarterback and lose your job, you get honored with a "non-dairy" and "vegan" dessert. pic.twitter.com/50yn43TfyQ — David Hookstead (@dhookstead) December 10, 2020
One Conservatives tweeted: “You know what to do, Patriots … Time to boycott Ben & Jerry’s.”
And the tweet of the day: “Ahhh yes. Social Justice ice cream. That should fix racism everywhere. Smh”
Ahhh yes. Social Justice ice cream. That should fix racism everywhere. Smh — BlueCordDevil (@BenRo62320277) December 10, 2020
Will they be next to go broke after going woke?
This article originally appeared on Zero Hedge.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-12-13--People Are Getting Sick Because of Masks, Not Despite Them!

This sick situation was all by design .
The world rulers fabricated a pandemic and then got people so scared and worn down that they accepted mask mandates .
Now people are wearing masks at work , driving in their cars , riding on their bikes , walking down the street , shopping at supermarkets , and even at their homes .
This idiocy is unprecedented in world history .
Never before have so many people smothered themselves for most of their waking lives , even though real science indicates the ineffectiveness of masks in stopping disease .
Yet they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face coverings for years !
I have extensively covered how these masks are causing serious damage by restricting oxygen intake .
Regardless of what “ fact checkers ” do to “ debunk ” this , the oxygen deprivation caused by wearing masks is obvious and easily provable , as I did with my candle experiment .
Lack of oxygen causes people to get headaches , think less clearly , and become sick much more easily .
This is not the whole story , though .
Almost everyone you see out wearing masks is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as is done in clinical settings .
They do not use proper procedures to put on and take off their masks , and they re-use the same masks all day long , making them breeding grounds for harmful bacteria .
Even in hospitals , masks become quickly contaminated with bacteria .
One of the bacterial infections caused by masks results in a serious rash .
Another serious problem is that wearing masks can lead to bacterial pneumonia , with symptoms very similar to those of this alleged “ novel ” coronavirus .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ what caused the massive amount of deaths seen with the 1918 “ Spanish ” flu , since even Fauci admits that bacterial pneumonia was a big killer during that pandemic , though he did not link it to mask wearing .
He did not connect the dots that need to be connected to see the bigger picture .
Everything in this article is disputed by “ mainstream ” sources , but it is simply common sense .
Humans are not designed to be breathing through fabric all day every day .
With every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a contaminated piece of fabric .
With every exhalation , the things that the body is trying to get rid of are trapped and some of them are brought back into the body .
We can not just go along to get along regarding mandatory masks .
It will be the death of us .

This sick situation was all by design. The world rulers fabricated a pandemic and then got people so scared and worn down that they accepted mask mandates. Now people are wearing masks at work, driving in their cars, riding on their bikes, walking down the street, shopping at supermarkets, and even at their homes. This idiocy is unprecedented in world history. Never before have so many people smothered themselves for most of their waking lives, even though real science indicates the ineffectiveness of masks in stopping disease.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/masks-are-neither-effective-nor-safe-a-summary-of-the-science/
Yet they want us wearing these oppressive and unhealthy face coverings for years!
http://www.renegadetribune.com/expert-from-johns-hopkins-says-americans-will-be-wearing-masks-for-years/
I have extensively covered how these masks are causing serious damage by restricting oxygen intake. Regardless of what “fact checkers” do to “debunk” this, the oxygen deprivation caused by wearing masks is obvious and easily provable, as I did with my candle experiment.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/they-are-trying-to-smother-our-spirit/
Lack of oxygen causes people to get headaches, think less clearly, and become sick much more easily.
This is not the whole story, though. Almost everyone you see out wearing masks is not doing so in a sterile fashion, as is done in clinical settings. They do not use proper procedures to put on and take off their masks, and they re-use the same masks all day long, making them breeding grounds for harmful bacteria. Even in hospitals, masks become quickly contaminated with bacteria.
One of the bacterial infections caused by masks results in a serious rash.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/masks-are-causing-serious-health-problems/
Another serious problem is that wearing masks can lead to bacterial pneumonia, with symptoms very similar to those of this alleged “novel” coronavirus. Mask wearing could very well have been what caused the massive amount of deaths seen with the 1918 “Spanish” flu, since even Fauci admits that bacterial pneumonia was a big killer during that pandemic, though he did not link it to mask wearing. He did not connect the dots that need to be connected to see the bigger picture.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/death-by-mask-mask-wearing-bacterial-pneumonia-infections-and-the-1918-flu/
Everything in this article is disputed by “mainstream” sources, but it is simply common sense. Humans are not designed to be breathing through fabric all day every day. With every inhalation, the air is filtered through a contaminated piece of fabric. With every exhalation, the things that the body is trying to get rid of are trapped and some of them are brought back into the body.
We cannot just go along to get along regarding mandatory masks. It will be the death of us.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-12-14--BillGates Says We Should Be Prepared for Life to Not Return to Normal “Even Through 2022”

.
@ BillGates on Covid : `` Even through 2022 ” we should be prepared for life to not return @ @ @ @ @ “ sadly '' it ’ s `` appropriate ” for bars and restaurants to close @ @ @ @ @ to six months '' pic.twitter.com/cmDD8pv3XR

Hey guys, if we all take the shots, keep our masks up, stop working, and stay away from loved ones, we might get out of this all by 2023! Just do what you’re told, okay?
.@BillGates on Covid: "Even through 2022” we should be prepared for life to not return to “normal”
Says “sadly" it’s "appropriate” for bars and restaurants to close over the next "four to six months" pic.twitter.com/cmDD8pv3XR
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 13, 2020


renegadetribune--2020-12-14--Cambridge Study: Lockdown ‘Substantially’ Deteriorated Children’s Mental Health

Renegade Editor ’ s Note : This article does not make it clear that no child ever should receive the COVID vaccine , even if it means they can come out of lockdown .
Hopefully you guys realize by now that re-posting an article does not entail endorsement of the contents or creator .
( FEE ) A new study by researchers at the University of Cambridge finds that the government-imposed lockdowns in response to the coronavirus pandemic cause significant harm to children ’ s mental health .
The study , published this week in the Archives of Disease in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kind to analyze data on younger children ’ s mental health before and during the first lockdown in the United Kingdom last spring .
Following 168 children between the ages of 7 ½ and 11 ½ , the researchers conclude : “ During the UK lockdown , children ’ s depression symptoms have increased substantially , relative to before lockdown .
The scale of this effect has direct relevance for the continuation of different elements of lockdown policy , such as complete or partial school closures.
” They continue : “ Specifically , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ratings of depression , with a medium-to-large effect size .
Our findings emphasise the need to incorporate the potential impact of lock-down on child mental health in planning the ongoing response to the global pandemic and the recovery from it.
” Other studies linking declining mental health with lockdown policies have emerged for adolescents and young adults in recent months , but children were not typically represented .
For example , the CDC reported in August that 1 in 4 individuals ages 18-24 contemplated suicide during the spring lockdowns , and a recent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in young adults .
Adolescent mental health has been hit particularly hard by the lockdowns and related social distancing policies .
For example , a 16-year-old boy from Brunswick , Maine took his life last week after leaving a note saying that he felt locked in his house during the pandemic and separated from friends due to remote learning .
The new University of Cambridge paper is the first longitudinal study to trace the mental health effects of lockdowns and social isolation on younger children , finding that their mental health is similarly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article this week in the New York Times acknowledged the loneliness that children feel this year , but echoed a sense of inevitability .
Describing the experience of a two-year-old who , upon encountering others , says “ Uh-Oh .
People , ” the Times explains that “ she ’ s part of a generation living in a particular new type of bubble — one without other children .
They are the Toddlers of Covid-19 .
Gone for her and many peers are the play dates , music classes , birthday parties , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ side-by-side flyby on adjacent swing sets.
” While the Times rightly points out that the most important relationships for toddlers are with their parents , the widespread acceptance of peer isolation of children during the past 10 months is unsettling .
Keeping children away from sandboxes and swing sets , or depriving them of small birthday parties and playdates , is doing more harm than good—particularly where children are mostly spared from the worst effects of COVID-19 and their risk of dying from COVID-19 is , thankfully , extremely low .
By contrast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic policies and practices that deprive young people of social connection is disturbingly high .
Ellen Townsend is a psychology professor at the University of Nottingham who has been speaking out about the harmful consequences of lockdowns and mass testing policies that are especially damaging to youth during the pandemic .
Townsend , along with several colleagues , launched a website to try to influence policymakers away from damaging lockdowns and mass testing protocols .
“ I am deeply concerned about the long-term impact on our children and young people both of lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ play is vital for healthy development from tots to teens , ” Townsend told me a recent interview .
“ Living in a constant state of threat will have impacts on mental health and development also .
I think mass testing will exacerbate this fear .
Mass testing will perpetuate restrictive measures – this is a scientifically unsound and unethical screening program .
Lockdowns are a disaster for the young and the disadvantaged.
” Townsend adds that these lockdown harms are not only temporary during the pandemic .
They can have lasting effects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being felt more acutely by young people than older people in this crisis .
The mental health impacts of loneliness can last for up to 9 years , ” she says .
What Can Parents Do ?
The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that COVID-19 vaccine trials for children are beginning , but noted that vaccines will likely not be ready for children by the start of the 2021/2022 academic year .
That could mean many more months of isolation for children unless parents push back against lockdowns , school closures , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ young people most of all .
Stanford ’ s Jay Bhattacharya , one of the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration that advocates a “ Focused Protection ” approach to the pandemic response , wrote recently : “ In effect , what we ’ ve been doing is requiring young people to bear the burden of controlling a disease from which they face little to no risk .
This is entirely backward from the right approach.
” In addition to resisting new and ongoing lockdown policies , parents can also take the lead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social interaction .
Whether by forming “ pods ” with other families to encourage safe socializing , encouraging teens to take a walk with their friends , or prioritizing sandbox play with other toddlers , parents can help to protect their children ’ s mental health and well-being in the months to come .

Renegade Editor’s Note: This article does not make it clear that no child ever should receive the COVID vaccine, even if it means they can come out of lockdown. Hopefully you guys realize by now that re-posting an article does not entail endorsement of the contents or creator.
By Kerry McDonald
(FEE) A new study by researchers at the University of Cambridge finds that the government-imposed lockdowns in response to the coronavirus pandemic cause significant harm to children’s mental health. The study, published this week in the Archives of Disease in Childhood, was the first of its kind to analyze data on younger children’s mental health before and during the first lockdown in the United Kingdom last spring.
Following 168 children between the ages of 7 ½ and 11 ½, the researchers conclude: “During the UK lockdown, children’s depression symptoms have increased substantially, relative to before lockdown. The scale of this effect has direct relevance for the continuation of different elements of lockdown policy, such as complete or partial school closures.”
They continue: “Specifically, we observed a statistically significant increase in ratings of depression, with a medium-to-large effect size. Our findings emphasise the need to incorporate the potential impact of lock-down on child mental health in planning the ongoing response to the global pandemic and the recovery from it.”
Lockdowns and Declining Youth Mental Health
Other studies linking declining mental health with lockdown policies have emerged for adolescents and young adults in recent months, but children were not typically represented. For example, the CDC reported in August that 1 in 4 individuals ages 18-24 contemplated suicide during the spring lockdowns, and a recent Harvard study found startling rates of depression in young adults. Adolescent mental health has been hit particularly hard by the lockdowns and related social distancing policies. For example, a 16-year-old boy from Brunswick, Maine took his life last week after leaving a note saying that he felt locked in his house during the pandemic and separated from friends due to remote learning.
The new University of Cambridge paper is the first longitudinal study to trace the mental health effects of lockdowns and social isolation on younger children, finding that their mental health is similarly deteriorating during the pandemic response.
An article this week in the New York Times acknowledged the loneliness that children feel this year, but echoed a sense of inevitability. Describing the experience of a two-year-old who, upon encountering others, says “Uh-Oh. People,” the Times explains that “she’s part of a generation living in a particular new type of bubble — one without other children. They are the Toddlers of Covid-19. Gone for her and many peers are the play dates, music classes, birthday parties, the serendipity of the sandbox or the side-by-side flyby on adjacent swing sets.”
"Alice McGraw, 2 yrs old, was walking with her parents in Lake Tahoe this summer when another family appeared, heading in their direction. The little girl stopped.
'Uh-oh,' she said and pointed: 'People.'” This isn't going to end well, folks. @mrichtel:https://t.co/eRSzZ7AUQv — Alec MacGillis (@AlecMacGillis) December 10, 2020
While the Times rightly points out that the most important relationships for toddlers are with their parents, the widespread acceptance of peer isolation of children during the past 10 months is unsettling. Keeping children away from sandboxes and swing sets, or depriving them of small birthday parties and playdates, is doing more harm than good—particularly where children are mostly spared from the worst effects of COVID-19 and their risk of dying from COVID-19 is, thankfully, extremely low. By contrast, the harm of lockdowns and other pandemic policies and practices that deprive young people of social connection is disturbingly high.
Ellen Townsend is a psychology professor at the University of Nottingham who has been speaking out about the harmful consequences of lockdowns and mass testing policies that are especially damaging to youth during the pandemic. Townsend, along with several colleagues, launched a website to try to influence policymakers away from damaging lockdowns and mass testing protocols.
“I am deeply concerned about the long-term impact on our children and young people both of lockdowns and mass testing. Face-to-face interaction and play is vital for healthy development from tots to teens,” Townsend told me a recent interview. “Living in a constant state of threat will have impacts on mental health and development also. I think mass testing will exacerbate this fear. Mass testing will perpetuate restrictive measures – this is a scientifically unsound and unethical screening program. Lockdowns are a disaster for the young and the disadvantaged.” Townsend adds that these lockdown harms are not only temporary during the pandemic. They can have lasting effects. “We know that loneliness is being felt more acutely by young people than older people in this crisis. The mental health impacts of loneliness can last for up to 9 years,” she says. What Can Parents Do? The Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that COVID-19 vaccine trials for children are beginning, but noted that vaccines will likely not be ready for children by the start of the 2021/2022 academic year. That could mean many more months of isolation for children unless parents push back against lockdowns, school closures, and related coercive policies that are harming young people most of all. Stanford’s Jay Bhattacharya, one of the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration that advocates a “Focused Protection” approach to the pandemic response, wrote recently: “In effect, what we’ve been doing is requiring young people to bear the burden of controlling a disease from which they face little to no risk. This is entirely backward from the right approach.” In addition to resisting new and ongoing lockdown policies, parents can also take the lead in ensuring that their children have crucial social interaction. Whether by forming “pods” with other families to encourage safe socializing, encouraging teens to take a walk with their friends, or prioritizing sandbox play with other toddlers, parents can help to protect their children’s mental health and well-being in the months to come.
Kerry McDonald is a Senior Education Fellow at FEE and author of Unschooled: Raising Curious, Well-Educated Children Outside the Conventional Classroom (Chicago Review Press, 2019). She is also an adjunct scholar at The Cato Institute and a regular Forbes contributor. Kerry has a B.A. in economics from Bowdoin College and an M.Ed. in education policy from Harvard University. She lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts with her husband and four children. You can sign up for her weekly newsletter on parenting and education here.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-12-14--Austrian MP Tests Cola for COVID In Front of Parliament – It Tests Positive

Michael Schnedlitz shows what a fraud the whole casedemic really is by testing cola for COVID in front of the @ @ @ @ @ like when the president of Tanzania tested a bunch of things for COVID earlier this @ @

Michael Schnedlitz shows what a fraud the whole casedemic really is by testing cola for COVID in front of the Austrian parliament.
Bitchute link
This is like when the president of Tanzania tested a bunch of things for COVID earlier this year.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-12-14--Canada Creates A Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Before COVID Vaccine Rollout

What Happened : The Canadian government has announced that it ’ s implementing a pan-Canadian no-fault vaccine injury support program for all Health Canada approved vaccines .
According to the government , the program “ will ensure that all Canadians have to have fair access to support in the rare event that they experience an adverse reaction to a vaccine .
This program will also bring Canada in line with its G7 counterparts with similar programs , and ensure the country remains competitive in accessing new vaccines as they become available.
” This means that people who are vaccinated to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for any other disease and experience an adverse event or injury after the immunization , will be eligible for compensation.The Canadian government has announced that it ’ s implementing a pan-Canadian no-fault vaccine injury support program for all Health Canada approved vaccines .
This program is a “ no-fault ” program , meaning the vaccine manufacturer ( pharmaceutical company ) nor the government will be held liable for the vaccine injury .
It ’ s is similar to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created by the United States in 1986 , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaccine Injury Compensation Program .
The program has paid approximately $ 4 billion to families of vaccine injured children , while shielding pharmaceutical companies from any wrongdoing .
The funds come from taxpayer money .
Health Canada claims that they approve vaccines after reviewing scientific evidence that shows the benefits outweigh the risks .
According to Health Minister Patty Hajdu , “ Canadians can have confidence in the rigour of the vaccine approvals system , however , in the rare event that a person experiences an adverse reaction , this program will help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The federal government also says that the chances of someone experiencing a truly serious adverse reaction after vaccination are “ extremely rare – less than one in a million.
” This is a comforting thought , but no statistics or data were given to back up this claim , and it ’ s also a claim that ’ s made by the Centres For Disease Control ( CDC ) in the United States with no evidence provided either .
These claims have been heavily debated by many .
For example , an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Agency for Health Care Research found that 1 in every 39 vaccines in the United States cause injury , which is a shocking comparison to the 1 in every million claim .
The main doctors involved with the study were Michael Klompas , M.D .
and Lazarus , Ross , MBBS , MPH , MMed , GDCompSci .
Klompas is a Professor of Population Medicine at Harvard Medical School , and Lazarus was a Harvard Medical School professor for 11 years , and was a professor there during this pilot study .
Preliminary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ October 2009 on 715,000 patients , and 1.4 million doses ( of 45 different vaccines ) were given to 376,452 individuals .
Of these doses , 35,570 possible reactions ( 2.6 percent of vaccinations ) were identified .
This is an average of 890 possible events , an average of 1.3 events per clinician , per month .
This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference .
If we look at examples from individual vaccines themselves , there is also some confusion .
For example , according to a MedAlerts search of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( VAERS ) database as of 2/5/19 , the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles , mumps , and rubella vaccines alone was : 93,929 adverse events , 1,810 disabilities , 6,902 hospitalizations , and 463 deaths .
What is even more disturbing about these numbers is that VAERS is a voluntary and passive reporting system that has been found to only capture 1 % of adverse events .
Why This Is Important : Information about vaccines is important especially in a time where , at least it seems , vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for some people to work , travel , go to a concert or the cinema and more .
A lot of people are asking if this is justified , as it is not blatant mandatory vaccination measures , but rather a way of mandating a vaccine in another form that will take away some of the rights and freedoms that people were used to prior to the pandemic .
There are a number of concerns many doctors and scientists are raising about vaccines , and have been raising about vaccines for quite some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I recently wrote about , out of many .
It ’ s no secret that vaccine hesitancy is at an all time high , even among many physicians and scientists .
This has actually been observed for a while .
For example , one study published in the journal EbioMedicine in 2013 outlines this point , and it ’ s one of many to do so .
At a 2019 conference on vaccines put on by the World Health Organization this fact was emphasized by Professor Heidi Larson , a Professor of Anthropology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the Vaccine Confidence Project .
According to her .
The point is that there is information on both sides of the coin , information that sometimes completely contradicts what we often hear from mainstream media .
The strange thing is that the points made by vaccine safety advocates and informed-consent supporters remain completely unacknowledged by mainstream media , and as a result a large portion of people are completely unaware of these concerns .
Why does mainstream media always use terms like “ anti-vax conspiracy theorists ” and ridicule ?
A paper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Justice and Social democracy titled , “ Immunity and Impunity : Corruption in the State Pharma Nexus ” by Professor Paddy Rawlinson from Western Sydney University may provide the explanation .
Critical criminology repeatedly has drawn attention to the state-corporate nexus as a site of corruption and other forms of criminality , a scenario exacerbated by the intensification of neoliberalism in areas such as health .
The state-pharmaceutical relationship , which increasingly influences health policy , is no exception .
That is especially so when pharmaceutical products such as vaccines , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandated in direct violation of the principle of informed consent .
Such policies have provoked suspicion and dissent as critics question the integrity of the state-pharma alliance and its impact on vaccine safety .
However , rather than encouraging open debate , draconian modes of governance have been implemented to repress and silence any form of criticism , thereby protecting the activities of the state and pharmaceutical industry from independent scrutiny .
The article examines this relationship in the context of recent legislation in Australia to intensify its mandatory regime around vaccines .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of speech , and to systematically excoriate those who criticise or dissent from mandatory vaccine programs , function as a corrupting process and , by extension , serve to provoke the notion that corruption does indeed exist within the state-pharma alliance .
The Takeaway : Do we really want to live in a world where we give so much power to a small group of people and governments who can decide what we can and can ’ t do based on whether or not we take a vaccine ?
Where will we draw @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedom of choice a priority here , especially for such a low mortality virus ?
Why are so many doctors and scientists who oppose these measures being censored and unacknowledged ?
We see this with The Great Barrington Declaration with regards to lockdown measures .
Why is science being censored ?
Over the last few months , I have seen academic articles and op-eds by professors retracted or labeled “ fake news ” by social media platforms .
Often , no explanation is provided .
I am concerned about this heavy-handedness and , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vinay Prasad , MD , MPH COVID-19 , just like 9/11 , is forcing more people to ask questions about how our world really operates and whether or not governments actually execute the will of the people .
At the end of the day we have to ask , why are controversial topics so poorly covered and ridiculed by mainstream media ?
Why do so many of us have so much trouble looking at new information , especially information that contradicts what we believe and have been made to believe ?
Why do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Why do we accept the invitation to fight ?
Will our sense-making be much easier and effective if we are clam , centered within self , clearer of our own bias ’ and more open to communicating with empathy ?
Perhaps it ’ s time we do that ?

By
What Happened: The Canadian government has announced that it’s implementing a pan-Canadian no-fault vaccine injury support program for all Health Canada approved vaccines. According to the government, the program “will ensure that all Canadians have to have fair access to support in the rare event that they experience an adverse reaction to a vaccine. This program will also bring Canada in line with its G7 counterparts with similar programs, and ensure the country remains competitive in accessing new vaccines as they become available.”
This means that people who are vaccinated to protect themselves against COVID-19, or vaccinated for any other disease and experience an adverse event or injury after the immunization, will be eligible for compensation.The Canadian government has announced that it’s implementing a pan-Canadian no-fault vaccine injury support program for all Health Canada approved vaccines.
This program is a “no-fault” program, meaning the vaccine manufacturer (pharmaceutical company) nor the government will be held liable for the vaccine injury. It’s is similar to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created by the United States in 1986, which is now referred to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The program has paid approximately $4 billion to families of vaccine injured children, while shielding pharmaceutical companies from any wrongdoing. The funds come from taxpayer money.
Health Canada claims that they approve vaccines after reviewing scientific evidence that shows the benefits outweigh the risks. According to Health Minister Patty Hajdu, “Canadians can have confidence in the rigour of the vaccine approvals system, however, in the rare event that a person experiences an adverse reaction, this program will help ensure they get the support they need.”
The federal government also says that the chances of someone experiencing a truly serious adverse reaction after vaccination are “extremely rare – less than one in a million.”
This is a comforting thought, but no statistics or data were given to back up this claim, and it’s also a claim that’s made by the Centres For Disease Control (CDC) in the United States with no evidence provided either. These claims have been heavily debated by many. For example, an HHS pilot study conducted by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research found that 1 in every 39 vaccines in the United States cause injury, which is a shocking comparison to the 1 in every million claim.
The main doctors involved with the study were Michael Klompas, M.D. and Lazarus, Ross, MBBS, MPH, MMed, GDCompSci.
Klompas is a Professor of Population Medicine at Harvard Medical School, and Lazarus was a Harvard Medical School professor for 11 years, and was a professor there during this pilot study.
Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.
If we look at examples from individual vaccines themselves, there is also some confusion. For example, according to a MedAlerts search of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. What is even more disturbing about these numbers is that VAERS is a voluntary and passive reporting system that has been found to only capture 1% of adverse events.
Why This Is Important: Information about vaccines is important especially in a time where, at least it seems, vaccines are going to be mandatory in order for some people to work, travel, go to a concert or the cinema and more. A lot of people are asking if this is justified, as it is not blatant mandatory vaccination measures, but rather a way of mandating a vaccine in another form that will take away some of the rights and freedoms that people were used to prior to the pandemic.
There are a number of concerns many doctors and scientists are raising about vaccines, and have been raising about vaccines for quite some time. Here’s one example I recently wrote about, out of many.
It’s no secret that vaccine hesitancy is at an all time high, even among many physicians and scientists. This has actually been observed for a while. For example, one study published in the journal EbioMedicine in 2013 outlines this point, and it’s one of many to do so.
At a 2019 conference on vaccines put on by the World Health Organization this fact was emphasized by Professor Heidi Larson, a Professor of Anthropology and the Risk and Decision Scientist Director at the Vaccine Confidence Project.
According to her.
The other thing that’s a trend, and an issue, is not just confidence in providers but confidence of health care providers, we have a very wobbly health professional frontline that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines. That’s a huge problem, because to this day any study I’ve seen… still, the most trusted person on any study I’ve seen globally is the health care provider…
The point is that there is information on both sides of the coin, information that sometimes completely contradicts what we often hear from mainstream media. The strange thing is that the points made by vaccine safety advocates and informed-consent supporters remain completely unacknowledged by mainstream media, and as a result a large portion of people are completely unaware of these concerns.
Why does mainstream media always use terms like “anti-vax conspiracy theorists” and ridicule?
A paper published in the International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social democracy titled, “Immunity and Impunity: Corruption in the State Pharma Nexus” by Professor Paddy Rawlinson from Western Sydney University may provide the explanation.


renegadetribune--2020-12-14--Bill Gates Says We Should Be Prepared for Life to Not Return to Normal “Even Through 2022”


renegadetribune--2020-12-15--The Real Dangers of Anti-White Extremism

We are told by the highest levels of government and mass media that White extremism presents an existential threat to @ @ @ @ @ has been inverted .

We are told by the highest levels of government and mass media that White extremism presents an existential threat to the world, but everything has been inverted.