renegadetribune--2020-11-30--Soul of The Forest: The Symbolist Art of by Edgard Maxence

According to official sources “ symbolism ” was a late nineteenth-century art movement that advocated the expression of an idea over the realistic description of the natural world through the use of metaphorical imagery .
This movement made its expression through literature and poetry but also through other disciplines such as music , theatre , and of course , fine art .
More a philosophy than an actual style of art , symbolism in painting influenced the contemporary Art Nouveau style and Les Nabis .
Edgard Maxence ( also spelled ‘ Edgar Maxence ’ ) was a clear example of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ marked by a subtle mystical symbolism , influenced by the English Pre-Raphaelites .
Some of his paintings in the gallery below might look quite familiar since Maxence made quite a name for himself at some point .
Among some of my favourite works of his I can mention Edelweiss , Ethereal , Soul of The Forest , Young Woman with Swans , and Rosa Mística the latter , in spite of being a proverbial religious painting , shows Maxence ’ s symbolist tendencies at their best .
The biography next is the best @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on this particular painter , unfortunately it does not provide any details on Maxence ’ s death or place of burial ( He died in La Bernerie-en-Retz , France , in 1954 according to wikipedia ) and its grammar needs just a little bit of improvement .
Regardless I hope people here appreciate Edgard Maxence ’ s art as much as I do .
As usual comments will be welcomed .
Edgard Maxence was born in Nantes in 1871 in a family of landowners .
Nothing predestined him to become an artist .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the cultural environment of Nantes helped him to choose an artistic career .
During his schooling at the Externat des Enfants Nantais , he followed the drawing lessons of Abbot Sotta ( the first master of Elie Delaunay ) who certainly was at the beginning of his artistic vocation .
In 1891 , Maxence was a successful candidate at the School of Fine Arts in Paris .
He first went to Elie Delaunay ’ s studio , and after to Gustave Moreau ’ s .
The meeting between Maxence and Moreau was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stayed in his master ’ s studio until 1896 , and remained faithful to his teaching all along his life .
Maxence ’ s studies at the Fine Arts School were brilliant : in 1893 he obtained the prize of “ Premier Logiste ” and won the first prize for expression faces in 1894 .
Despite these prizes , he was eliminated from the first round of the 1895 ’ s Prix de Rome .
This failure certainly determined his future artistic way .
When he was a young painter , Maxence distinguished @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Since 1893 , he regularly exhibited at the Salon of French Artists and took part at the Salon of Rose-Croix between 1895 and 1897 .
His paintings were very attached with the Symbolist movement to whom he took his subjects .
He was inspired by the Breton legends , ambiguous and dark subjects , dreamy processions .
He was simultaneously fed by his Christian traditions and his Celtic influences .
His palette was varied : he used garnet-colored , emerald green , muffled yellow .
He also used very varied mediums , either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to time both together .
The tempera , piece of gold , gouache and charcoal gave a singular appearance to his art works and accentuated the primitive appearance of his mystic scenes , despite of the realistic treatment of the faces .
In 1900 , he was awarded with a gold medal at the Word Fair and gained the Legion of Honour .
After WWI , he decided to turn towards more lucrative subjects .
Then he continued a brilliant career of social portraits painter , creating some still lifes and landscape paintings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ honour , he was promoted Officer in 1927 ; he was elected at the Institut in 1924 in lieu of the painter Fernand Cormon .
The Soul of the Spring perfectly illustrates the main features of Maxence ’ s art .
With an outstandingly symbolic subject , the painting shows the usual bright colors of the painter .
The celtic influence emphasizes the mysticism of this work .
Sources : Literary Theory and Criticism website , The Guardian , Galerie Ary Jan , Musée d ’ Orsay , and wikipedia .

According to official sources “symbolism” was a late nineteenth-century art movement that advocated the expression of an idea over the realistic description of the natural world through the use of metaphorical imagery. This movement made its expression through literature and poetry but also through other disciplines such as music, theatre, and of course, fine art. More a philosophy than an actual style of art, symbolism in painting influenced the contemporary Art Nouveau style and Les Nabis.
Edgard Maxence (also spelled ‘Edgar Maxence’) was a clear example of this artistic philosophy. His art was marked by a subtle mystical symbolism, influenced by the English Pre-Raphaelites.
Some of his paintings in the gallery below might look quite familiar since Maxence made quite a name for himself at some point. Among some of my favourite works of his I can mention Edelweiss, Ethereal, Soul of The Forest, Young Woman with Swans, and Rosa Mística the latter, in spite of being a proverbial religious painting, shows Maxence’s symbolist tendencies at their best.
The biography next is the best source of information that I have found on this particular painter, unfortunately it does not provide any details on Maxence’s death or place of burial (He died in La Bernerie-en-Retz, France, in 1954 according to wikipedia) and its grammar needs just a little bit of improvement. Regardless I hope people here appreciate Edgard Maxence’s art as much as I do. As usual comments will be welcomed.
Biography of Edgard Maxence by Galerie Ary Jan
Edgard Maxence was born in Nantes in 1871 in a family of landowners. Nothing predestined him to become an artist. But his mother, Estelle Boquien, with the cultural environment of Nantes helped him to choose an artistic career. During his schooling at the Externat des Enfants Nantais, he followed the drawing lessons of Abbot Sotta (the first master of Elie Delaunay) who certainly was at the beginning of his artistic vocation.
In 1891, Maxence was a successful candidate at the School of Fine Arts in Paris. He first went to Elie Delaunay’s studio, and after to Gustave Moreau’s. The meeting between Maxence and Moreau was absolutely decisive for the young artist who stayed in his master’s studio until 1896, and remained faithful to his teaching all along his life.
Maxence’s studies at the Fine Arts School were brilliant: in 1893 he obtained the prize of “Premier Logiste” and won the first prize for expression faces in 1894. Despite these prizes, he was eliminated from the first round of the 1895’s Prix de Rome. This failure certainly determined his future artistic way.
When he was a young painter, Maxence distinguished himself by his taste for portraits. Since 1893, he regularly exhibited at the Salon of French Artists and took part at the Salon of Rose-Croix between 1895 and 1897. His paintings were very attached with the Symbolist movement to whom he took his subjects. He was inspired by the Breton legends, ambiguous and dark subjects, dreamy processions. He was simultaneously fed by his Christian traditions and his Celtic influences.
His palette was varied: he used garnet-colored, emerald green, muffled yellow. He also used very varied mediums, either oil, either wax, from time to time both together. The tempera, piece of gold, gouache and charcoal gave a singular appearance to his art works and accentuated the primitive appearance of his mystic scenes, despite of the realistic treatment of the faces.
In 1900, he was awarded with a gold medal at the Word Fair and gained the Legion of Honour. After WWI, he decided to turn towards more lucrative subjects. Then he continued a brilliant career of social portraits painter, creating some still lifes and landscape paintings too. Chevalier of the Legion of honour, he was promoted Officer in 1927; he was elected at the Institut in 1924 in lieu of the painter Fernand Cormon.
The Soul of the Spring perfectly illustrates the main features of Maxence’s art. With an outstandingly symbolic subject, the painting shows the usual bright colors of the painter. The celtic influence emphasizes the mysticism of this work.
Sources: Literary Theory and Criticism website, The Guardian, Galerie Ary Jan, Musée d’Orsay, and wikipedia.
BUY ME A VIRTUAL COFFEE
'Ethereal' by Edgar Maxence 'Bacchante' or 'Autumn' by Edgar Maxence 'Edelweiss' by Edgar Maxence 'Annonciation' by Edgar Maxence 'Jeune Femme À La Coiffe Devant La Mer' (1902) by Edgar Maxence 'Ève' (1901) by Edgar Maxence 'Faunesse Entouree De Fleurs' by Edgar Maxence 'Femme En Meditation Dans Un Paysage' by Edgar Maxence 'Femme Libellule' (1910) by Edgar Maxence 'La Femme À L'Orchidée' (1900) by Edgar Maxence 'Young Lady In Profile Reading' (1871) by Edgar Maxence 'Young Pensive Woman' (1900) by Edgar Maxence 'Young Woman with Swans' by Edgar Maxence 'Reverie' by Edgar Maxence 'Junne' by Edgar Maxence 'La Légende Bretonne' (The Legend of Brittany) (1906) by Edgar Maxence 'Peacock Profile' (c.1896) by Edgar Maxence 'Portrait de Femme avec Collier de Perles' (1901) by Edgar Maxence 'Portrait D'enfant' (1900) by Edgar Maxence 'Portrait of A Lady' by Edgar Maxence 'Les Choristes' by Edgar Maxence 'Portrait De Jeune Fille' (ca. 1900) by Edgar Maxence 'Portrait De Jeune Femme' (c.1895) by Edgar Maxence 'Portrait De Femme À La Couronne De Fleurs' (1906) by Edgar Maxence 'Rosa Mística' (1918) by Edgar Maxence 'Soul of The Forest' (1898) by Edgar Maxence 'Lame De La Source' a.k.a. 'The Soul of the Spring' by Edgar Maxence 'The Snow Queen' by Edgar Maxence 'Serenity' (1912) by Edgar Maxence 'The Book of Peace' (1913) by Edgard Maxence Untitled - Property from a private collection, sold in 1983. Art by Edgar Maxence 'Siren' (1902) by Edgar Maxence 'Les Âmes Au Bord Du Styx' by Edgar Maxence 'Priere De Remettre A Lourdes' (1899) by Edgard Maxence 'Portrait de Femme' by Edgar Maxence 'The Angel' by Edgar Maxence Woman at the center looking rather suspicious: 'Les Fleurs Du Lac' (1900) by Edgar Maxence 'Les Fleurs Du Lac' (1900) (detail) by Edgar Maxence 'Le Recueillement' (Contemplation) (c.1905) by Edgar Maxence 'Primavera' (1915) by Edgar Maxence 'The Book of Peace' (Le Livre De Paix) (1913) by Edgar Maxence 'The Hour of Peace' (L'Heure De La Paix) by Edgar Maxence 'St. Joan of Arc praying' by Edgar Maxence 'Untitled' by Edgar Maxence Evocative: 'Portrait of a Girl with Iris Flowers' (1948) by Edgard Maxence
Share now!
Author: J. Belenger J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. J.Belenger (pronounced with a hard 'G') is a musician, composer and experienced graphic artist. He participated in the soundtrack for the documentary ‘Hellstorm’, directed by Kyle Hunt, in 2015. He has also collaborated extensively with Justice 4 Germans in the past. Twitter Facebook


renegadetribune--2020-11-30--The Other Holohoax ‘Extermination Camps’

After disposing of the core of the Holocaust lie — the Auschwitz lie — we can deal with the other five “ extermination camps ” .
Not so much has been written about them , so a considerably shorter discussion will suffice .
Majdanek , according to most Holocaust historians , was a combination work and extermination camp , and to this extent comparable to Auschwitz .
By contrast , Chelmno , Sobibor , Treblinka and Belzec are all alleged to have been pure “ death factories ” .
These camps are supposed to have been dismantled by the Germans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end of the war , and all evidence destroyed .
This is supposed to be why there are documents : the Germans destroyed them !
Let us run through the list very briefly .
Majdanek , a large work camp , lay immediately on the edge of the city of Lublin , after which it was named ; the name “ Majdanek ” was initially used only by the Poles .
The figures of murdered jews quoted for Majdanek fluctuate between 50,000 and 1.38 million ( 1 ) .
A few Holocaust writers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2 ) and Wolfgang Benz ( 3 ) do not even consider it an extermination camp .
In fact , the gas chambers there are only defended in a lukewarm manner .
That the premises still shown to tourists as “ gas chambers ” today were nothing of the kind , has been irrefutably shown by Germar Rudolf ( 4 ) .
The camp is really not worth wasting much of our time .
At Chelmno , in western Poland , 1.35 million jews are supposed to have been murdered , according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , p. 398 ) ; 400,000 according to Claude Lanzmann ( 5 ) ; 300,000 according to Wolfgang Scheffler ( 6 ) ; 150,000 according to Raul Hilberg ( 7 ) .
That none of the authors makes even the slightest attempt to prove the figures cited , is quite normal practice .
In Chelmno , the murders are supposed to have been carried out exclusively by means of “ gas vans ” .
The whole extermination camp stands and falls with the existence or non-existence of the gas vans .
The evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next chapter .
Sobibor is mentioned in a short exchange of correspondence between Heinrich Himmler and the Inspector of Concentration Camps , Richard Gluecks from 1943 .
Gluecks suggested converting Sobibor into a “ concentration camp ” .
Himmler rejected this suggestion on 5 July 1943 ( 8 ) .
So what kind of camp was it ?
The exterminationists say it was an extermination camp .
The number of victims is generally estimated at 200,000 to 250,000 victims .
With regards to the murder weapon , it took decades for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which one it was .
One of the eyewitnesses , a “ Soviet ” jew named Alexander Pechersky , described the mass murders as follows ( 9 ) : “ At first glance , as one entered , it like a normal shower : hot and cold taps for running water , wash basins… as soon as everyone was inside , the doors slammed shut with a loud noise .
Out of holes in the ceiling , a heavy , blackish substance poured down in spiral shapes… ” To drown out the pitiful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Sobibor kept a flock of geese [ ! ]
which were made to quack ( or whatever noise it is that is made by geese ) , very loudly , whenever the blackish substance was introduced ( 10 ) .
Historians were not too hot on this version , so they soon changed it into a gas chamber yarn .
According to Poliakov , the murder weapon was a Diesel motor ( 11 ) ; Hilberg replaced the Diesel motor with a gasoline motor ( 12 ) ; the Enzyklopaedie des Holocaust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by declaring that the murder weapon was a Diesel motor , and that settles it ( 13 ) .
Sobibor and Chelmno play quite a subordinate role in Holocaust propaganda .
The names are often unknown , even to people familiar with contemporary history .
600,000 jews are supposed to have been murdered in Belzec between March and December 1942 .
According to which “ historian ” you read , between one and five Jews survived the camp ( 14 ) , so that the monstrous “ Nazi ” machine proved itself especially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the mass murders at Belzec is naturally Kurt Gerstein , who , it will be remembered , reported 20 – 25 million gassing victims , 35 – 40 m high piles of shoes and underwear , and 28 – 32 gas chamber inmates per square metre .
Apart from Gerstein , there is only one “ witness ” to the gas chamber , a “ Polish ” jew named Rudolf Reder , who is supposed to be one of the one to five survivors of the camp .
Reder , however , spoke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 15 ) .
For decades , the murder weapon at Belzec was supposed to have been a Diesel motor .
During the initial development phase of the Holocaust yarn , nevertheless , all sorts of imaginable variants on this tale were current , ranging from Dr. Stefan Szende ’ s submergible platforms to Jan Karski ’ s quicklime cars , and even an electrical oven mentioned by Abraham Silberschein ( 16 ) .
All these tales have since disappeared into the rubbish bin of history .
For the largest of the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ throw numbers around ranging from 750,000 to 3,000,000 .
At the Jerusalem trial of John Demjanjuk ( 17 ) , there was talk of 875,000 .
According to the classic book Die Hoelle von Treblinka by the “ Soviet ” jew Vassily Grossman ( 18 ) , the following methods of murder were used : – suffocation of the victims by pumping air out of the death chambers .
This technically quite impossible horror story — the chambers would have collapsed due to the underpressure — immediately disappeared from the arsenal of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with hot steam .
This variant was decided upon by the Nuremberg tribunal on 14 December 1945 ( Nuremberg Document PS-3311 ) ; – killing them with Diesel exhaust gas .
This variant pushed the others off the stage of history .
In February 1946 , a jew named Samuel Rajzman testified at Nuremberg that , in Treblinka , there were three , later , however , another ten additional gas chambers ( Nuremberg trial transcript IMT VIII p. 361 , German text ) .
Since then , the exterminationists no longer wish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chambers ” ( also described at Nuremberg three months earlier ) , or the air-pumping vacuum chambers , or the chlorine executions and assembly line shootings at Treblinka , of which there was some talk for a while ( 19 ) .
As at Chelmno , Sobibor and Belzec , the bodies at Treblinka are supposed to have been buried in mass graves , but dug up in 1943 and cremated without a trace under the open sky .
The Israeli “ specialist ” Y. Arad reported ( 20 ) .
“ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the bodies burnt well , even without additional fuel.
” This method is supposed to have been developed by a technically ingenious SS man by the name of Herbert Floss , who is said to have discovered that old bodies of fat women burnt best .
He then used these ideally combustible cadavers as fuel for the others ( 21 ) .
It is unfortunate that this efficient method of corpse destruction has not yet been discovered by the inhabitants of the Indian sub-continent , who have chopped down a large part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Perhaps the reason for it is that bodies only burn by themselves under the SS system of hatred and violence ; under “ free-democratic ” conditions , they just won ’ t burn by themselves , due to their high water content ( over 60 % ) .
According to documentation drawn up during the war by jewish groups , there were 10 gas chambers in Treblinka , which could hold a total of 6,000 men at a time .
The path to these death chambers was surrounded by hedges and only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which means , that only two men could march side by side .
Assuming an interval of half a metre between every person marching and the person in front , this would mean a line of people waiting 2 kilometres long !
According to Adelbert Rueckerl , the former director of the Ludwigsburg Central Office for the Prosecution of NS Crimes , there were only 35 to 40 SS men employed at Treblinka ( 23 ) , which means that each SS man was responsible for at least 150 jews !
Fortunately , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of running away or overpowering the pair of SS men , they marched , according to a witness at the Dusseldorf Treblinka Trial , “ naked and meekly into the gas chamber ” ( 24 ) .
During the Jerusalem trial against John Demjanjuk , Treblinka returned to the spotlight of the world ’ s attention .
Demjanjuk , a US citizen of Ukranian-origin and automobile worker , was extradited from the United States in violation of all democratic procedures to Israel , where he was hauled before the court as “ Ivan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of thousands at Treblinka .
Five jewish “ eyewitnesses ” swore they had seen him pushing jews into the gas chambers after cutting off their ears , cutting women ’ s breasts off with a sword , and cutting open the stomachs of pregnant women with a sword .
Demjanjuk was first sentenced to death , but was acquitted on appeal for lack of proof , and released in September 1993 ; once again proving the “ credibility ” of such eyewitnesses ( 25 ) .
The alleged murder weapon in the four @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , has been studied chiefly by the German-American engineer Friedrich Paul Berg ( 26 ) .
Berg clearly shows the technical absurdity of the Diesel motor legend : It is , of course , not impossible , as some revisionists have erroneously reported , to kill people with Diesel exhaust , but it is tedious and considerably inefficient , because these exhaust gases are very poorly suited as murder weapons due to their high oxygen and very low carbon monoxide content .
While a gasoline motor can easily produce exhaust with a carbon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a Diesel motor can not even produce a carbon monoxide concentration of one percent , even if the motor is incorrectly adjusted to increase the carbon monoxide content .
Ironically , the introduction of Diesel exhaust gases into a chamber cram-packed with people would only prolong the death struggle of the victims , since these gases contain an oxygen content of approximately 16 % , which is sufficient for survival .
Instead of introducing the exhaust gas , the executioners could have simply allowed them to suffocate .
In any case , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breathed up before the carbon monoxide took effect !
Any gasoline motor , not to mention the gas generators already mentioned elsewhere , would have been incomparably more efficient as a murder weapon than a Diesel .
Exactly like the Zyklon B story , the Diesel story was quite obviously invented by technical morons — to the detriment of the exterminationists , since the Diesel motor story is in the history books , and there ’ s no way to make it disappear .
The manner in whch the bodies at Treblinka were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detail by the certified engineer Arnulf Neumaier ( 27 ) .
Neumaier assumes 875,000 bodies , the figure given at the Demjanjuk Trial .
For Belzec and Sobibor , where the cremations are supposed to have taken place on the same model , the number of victims mentioned in the following must be reduced correspondingly .
To burn 875,000 bodies in the open would have required at least 200 kg wood per corpse , i.e.
, a total of 195,000 tons .
This is equivalent to a forest 6.4 km long and 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which are supposed to have lasted from early March until late August 1943 , would have required 2,800 wood cutters per day , assuming that it takes one man to cut down one tree , cut the branches off , and saw it up .
According to Holocaust literature , there were only 500 “ working jews ” in total at the camp , only 25 of whom , according to a Holocaust survivor named Richard Glazar , were on wood-cutting detail , i.e.
, less than 1 1/2 % of the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ size does not , and did not , exist in the vicinity of Treblinka ; the transport of 195,000 tons of wood to the camp would certainly have been noted in the records of the Reichsbahn , if the wood had been brought from someplace else .
Further , the 875,000 bodies would have left 2,900 tons of ashes in addition to 1,000 tons of wood ash .
These ashes would have contained millions of unburnt pieces of bone , in addition to 20 to 30 million teeth — even if we assume @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one tooth on average .
If the Soviets and the Poles had found only a fraction of these ashes , bones , and teeth , they would have drummed an international commission together with a huge blare of propaganda , and the entire world would have been presented with the proof of German bestiality .
So why didn ’ t they ?
What were the “ pure extermination camps ” in reality ?
Quite undisputedly , hundreds of thousands of jews were deported to Treblinka after the defeat of the revolt in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of camp was Treblinka ?
Revisionists assume that it was a transit camp .
It couldn ’ t have been an extermination camp in which the arriving jews were gassed and burned , because of the technical impossibility of mass gassings with carbon monoxide and cremations using the methods described , quite apart from the fact that the “ eyewitness testimony ” as to the properties of the camp are not in accordance with the air photos .
Nor was it a work camp , since it was much too small to hold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We are speaking here of the “ extermination camp ” , also called Treblinka 2 .
Hardly three kilometers away lay so-called Treblinka 1 , which was quite undisputedly a work camp , and has never played any role in the holocaust literature . )
The transit camp theory is also supported by the fact that Jews are known to have been deported from Treblinka to other camps .
Holocaust literature even mentions Jews who were transferred from Treblinka to Majdanek ( 29 ) .
Why all these unnecessary transports from one “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Treblinka served as a transit camp on the way to settlements located further east in the Baltic and White Russia ) ; the existence of these settlements is admited even by authors like Reitlinger and Hilberg .
In our view , Sobibor and Belzec were transit camps , too ; this is supported , among other things , by their location in the outermost east of the General Gouvernement .
A clue to this possibility , with regards to Belzec , is furnished by a German document dated 17 March 1942 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the border and were not to come back ” ( 30 ) .
Chelmno was presumably a transit camp , too , and was located in the Warthegau ; according to the Korherr report , many Jews were transferred from this area to the Eastern regions .
Did the Germans destroy the documents relating to these camps , as stated in Holocaust literature ?
We can not exclude this possibility .
But if so , why did they carelessly leave all the documentation from Auschwitz and Majdanek just lying around to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to us that the documents were either destroyed by the Soviets or the Poles , or that they were stored in a safe place because they contradicted the extermination legend .
Some interesting revelations may be expected over the coming years .
1 ) The first number is named by Lucy Dawidowicz ( p. 191 ) and the second by Raul Hilberg ( p. 956 ) .
14 ) Compare , in this regard , the comments on Belzec in the next chapter ( Six Million Miracles ) .
15 ) Reder ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) was summarized in Carlo Mattogno in Il rapporto Gerstein .
Anatomia di un falso ( Sentinella d ’ Italia , 1985 , p. 129 ff ) .
16 ) Compare , in this regard , our book Der Holocaust auf dem Prufstand , 1992 , p. 47 , ff .
17 ) On the Demjanjuk trial , see Rullmann .
22 ) See , in this regard , Neumaier in Gauss , Grundlagen…

Holocaust or Hoax?
The Other Extermination Camps
by Jürgen Graf
Preliminary remarks
After disposing of the core of the Holocaust lie — the Auschwitz lie — we can deal with the other five “extermination camps”. Not so much has been written about them, so a considerably shorter discussion will suffice.
Majdanek, according to most Holocaust historians, was a combination work and extermination camp, and to this extent comparable to Auschwitz. By contrast, Chelmno, Sobibor, Treblinka and Belzec are all alleged to have been pure “death factories”. These camps are supposed to have been dismantled by the Germans without a trace, even before the end of the war, and all evidence destroyed. This is supposed to be why there are documents: the Germans destroyed them!
Let us run through the list very briefly.
Majdanek
Majdanek, a large work camp, lay immediately on the edge of the city of Lublin, after which it was named; the name “Majdanek” was initially used only by the Poles.
The figures of murdered jews quoted for Majdanek fluctuate between 50,000 and 1.38 million (1). A few Holocaust writers, for example, Gerald Reitlinger (2) and Wolfgang Benz (3) do not even consider it an extermination camp. In fact, the gas chambers there are only defended in a lukewarm manner. That the premises still shown to tourists as “gas chambers” today were nothing of the kind, has been irrefutably shown by Germar Rudolf (4). The camp is really not worth wasting much of our time.
Chelmno
At Chelmno, in western Poland, 1.35 million jews are supposed to have been murdered, according to the jewish Year book (volume 47, p. 398); 400,000 according to Claude Lanzmann (5); 300,000 according to Wolfgang Scheffler (6); 150,000 according to Raul Hilberg (7). That none of the authors makes even the slightest attempt to prove the figures cited, is quite normal practice.
In Chelmno, the murders are supposed to have been carried out exclusively by means of “gas vans”. The whole extermination camp stands and falls with the existence or non-existence of the gas vans. The evidence for their existence will be discussed in the next chapter.
Sobibor
Sobibor is mentioned in a short exchange of correspondence between Heinrich Himmler and the Inspector of Concentration Camps, Richard Gluecks from 1943. Gluecks suggested converting Sobibor into a “concentration camp”. Himmler rejected this suggestion on 5 July 1943 (8). So what kind of camp was it? The exterminationists say it was an extermination camp. The number of victims is generally estimated at 200,000 to 250,000 victims. With regards to the murder weapon, it took decades for the ruling cliques in the world to decide which one it was. One of the eyewitnesses, a “Soviet” jew named Alexander Pechersky, described the mass murders as follows (9):
“At first glance, as one entered, it like a normal shower: hot and cold taps for running water, wash basins… as soon as everyone was inside, the doors slammed shut with a loud noise. Out of holes in the ceiling, a heavy, blackish substance poured down in spiral shapes…”
To drown out the pitiful cries of the victims, the Germans at Sobibor kept a flock of geese [!] which were made to quack (or whatever noise it is that is made by geese), very loudly, whenever the blackish substance was introduced (10). Historians were not too hot on this version, so they soon changed it into a gas chamber yarn. According to Poliakov, the murder weapon was a Diesel motor (11); Hilberg replaced the Diesel motor with a gasoline motor (12); the Enzyklopaedie des Holocaust finally put an end to the debate by declaring that the murder weapon was a Diesel motor, and that settles it (13).
Sobibor and Chelmno play quite a subordinate role in Holocaust propaganda. The names are often unknown, even to people familiar with contemporary history.
Belzec
600,000 jews are supposed to have been murdered in Belzec between March and December 1942. According to which “historian” you read, between one and five Jews survived the camp (14), so that the monstrous “Nazi” machine proved itself especially efficient at Belzec. Star witness for the mass murders at Belzec is naturally Kurt Gerstein, who, it will be remembered, reported 20 – 25 million gassing victims, 35 – 40 m high piles of shoes and underwear, and 28 – 32 gas chamber inmates per square metre. Apart from Gerstein, there is only one “witness” to the gas chamber, a “Polish” jew named Rudolf Reder, who is supposed to be one of the one to five survivors of the camp. Reder, however, spoke of three million gassing victims at Belzec (15).
For decades, the murder weapon at Belzec was supposed to have been a Diesel motor. During the initial development phase of the Holocaust yarn, nevertheless, all sorts of imaginable variants on this tale were current, ranging from Dr. Stefan Szende’s submergible platforms to Jan Karski’s quicklime cars, and even an electrical oven mentioned by Abraham Silberschein (16). All these tales have since disappeared into the rubbish bin of history.
Treblinka
For the largest of the “pure extermination camps”, the exterminationists throw numbers around ranging from 750,000 to 3,000,000. At the Jerusalem trial of John Demjanjuk (17), there was talk of 875,000.
According to the classic book Die Hoelle von Treblinka by the “Soviet” jew Vassily Grossman (18), the following methods of murder were used:
– suffocation of the victims by pumping air out of the death chambers. This technically quite impossible horror story — the chambers would have collapsed due to the underpressure — immediately disappeared from the arsenal of the Holocaust propagandists;
– baking the victims with hot steam. This variant was decided upon by the Nuremberg tribunal on 14 December 1945 (Nuremberg Document PS-3311);
– killing them with Diesel exhaust gas. This variant pushed the others off the stage of history. In February 1946, a jew named Samuel Rajzman testified at Nuremberg that, in Treblinka, there were three, later, however, another ten additional gas chambers (Nuremberg trial transcript IMT VIII p. 361, German text). Since then, the exterminationists no longer wish to hear anything about the “steam chambers” (also described at Nuremberg three months earlier), or the air-pumping vacuum chambers, or the chlorine executions and assembly line shootings at Treblinka, of which there was some talk for a while (19).
As at Chelmno, Sobibor and Belzec, the bodies at Treblinka are supposed to have been buried in mass graves, but dug up in 1943 and cremated without a trace under the open sky. The Israeli “specialist” Y. Arad reported (20).
“The men responsible for the cremations noted immediately that the bodies burnt well, even without additional fuel.”
This method is supposed to have been developed by a technically ingenious SS man by the name of Herbert Floss, who is said to have discovered that old bodies of fat women burnt best. He then used these ideally combustible cadavers as fuel for the others (21). It is unfortunate that this efficient method of corpse destruction has not yet been discovered by the inhabitants of the Indian sub-continent, who have chopped down a large part of their forests just to burn corpses. Perhaps the reason for it is that bodies only burn by themselves under the SS system of hatred and violence; under “free-democratic” conditions, they just won’t burn by themselves, due to their high water content (over 60%).
According to documentation drawn up during the war by jewish groups, there were 10 gas chambers in Treblinka, which could hold a total of 6,000 men at a time. The path to these death chambers was surrounded by hedges and only 1.5 m wide (22), which means, that only two men could march side by side. Assuming an interval of half a metre between every person marching and the person in front, this would mean a line of people waiting 2 kilometres long! According to Adelbert Rueckerl, the former director of the Ludwigsburg Central Office for the Prosecution of NS Crimes, there were only 35 to 40 SS men employed at Treblinka (23), which means that each SS man was responsible for at least 150 jews! Fortunately, the jews proved unusually cooperative; instead of running away or overpowering the pair of SS men, they marched, according to a witness at the Dusseldorf Treblinka Trial, “naked and meekly into the gas chamber” (24).
During the Jerusalem trial against John Demjanjuk, Treblinka returned to the spotlight of the world’s attention. Demjanjuk, a US citizen of Ukranian-origin and automobile worker, was extradited from the United States in violation of all democratic procedures to Israel, where he was hauled before the court as “Ivan the Terrible”, murderer of hundreds of thousands at Treblinka. Five jewish “eyewitnesses” swore they had seen him pushing jews into the gas chambers after cutting off their ears, cutting women’s breasts off with a sword, and cutting open the stomachs of pregnant women with a sword. Demjanjuk was first sentenced to death, but was acquitted on appeal for lack of proof, and released in September 1993; once again proving the “credibility” of such eyewitnesses (25).
The scientific studies
a) Friedrich Paul Berg’s study of the murder weapon
The alleged murder weapon in the four pure extermination camps, the Diesel motor, has been studied chiefly by the German-American engineer Friedrich Paul Berg (26). Berg clearly shows the technical absurdity of the Diesel motor legend:
It is, of course, not impossible, as some revisionists have erroneously reported, to kill people with Diesel exhaust, but it is tedious and considerably inefficient, because these exhaust gases are very poorly suited as murder weapons due to their high oxygen and very low carbon monoxide content. While a gasoline motor can easily produce exhaust with a carbon monoxide content of seven percent or more, a Diesel motor cannot even produce a carbon monoxide concentration of one percent, even if the motor is incorrectly adjusted to increase the carbon monoxide content. Ironically, the introduction of Diesel exhaust gases into a chamber cram-packed with people would only prolong the death struggle of the victims, since these gases contain an oxygen content of approximately 16%, which is sufficient for survival. Instead of introducing the exhaust gas, the executioners could have simply allowed them to suffocate. In any case, all the available oxygen would have been breathed up before the carbon monoxide took effect!
Any gasoline motor, not to mention the gas generators already mentioned elsewhere, would have been incomparably more efficient as a murder weapon than a Diesel.
Exactly like the Zyklon B story, the Diesel story was quite obviously invented by technical morons — to the detriment of the exterminationists, since the Diesel motor story is in the history books, and there’s no way to make it disappear.
b) Arnulf Neumaier’s study of the cremations
The manner in whch the bodies at Treblinka were allegedly disposed of has been studied in detail by the certified engineer Arnulf Neumaier (27). Neumaier assumes 875,000 bodies, the figure given at the Demjanjuk Trial. For Belzec and Sobibor, where the cremations are supposed to have taken place on the same model, the number of victims mentioned in the following must be reduced correspondingly.
To burn 875,000 bodies in the open would have required at least 200 kg wood per corpse, i.e., a total of 195,000 tons. This is equivalent to a forest 6.4 km long and 1 km wide. The cremation actions, which are supposed to have lasted from early March until late August 1943, would have required 2,800 wood cutters per day, assuming that it takes one man to cut down one tree, cut the branches off, and saw it up. According to Holocaust literature, there were only 500 “working jews” in total at the camp, only 25 of whom, according to a Holocaust survivor named Richard Glazar, were on wood-cutting detail, i.e., less than 1 1/2% of the number required. Deforested terrain of the corresponding size does not, and did not, exist in the vicinity of Treblinka; the transport of 195,000 tons of wood to the camp would certainly have been noted in the records of the Reichsbahn, if the wood had been brought from someplace else.
Further, the 875,000 bodies would have left 2,900 tons of ashes in addition to 1,000 tons of wood ash. These ashes would have contained millions of unburnt pieces of bone, in addition to 20 to 30 million teeth — even if we assume that each of the 875,000 victims lacked one tooth on average. If the Soviets and the Poles had found only a fraction of these ashes, bones, and teeth, they would have drummed an international commission together with a huge blare of propaganda, and the entire world would have been presented with the proof of German bestiality. So why didn’t they?
What were the “pure extermination camps” in reality?
Quite undisputedly, hundreds of thousands of jews were deported to Treblinka after the defeat of the revolt in the Warsaw Ghetto revolt alone. What kind of camp was Treblinka?
Revisionists assume that it was a transit camp. It couldn’t have been an extermination camp in which the arriving jews were gassed and burned, because of the technical impossibility of mass gassings with carbon monoxide and cremations using the methods described, quite apart from the fact that the “eyewitness testimony” as to the properties of the camp are not in accordance with the air photos. Nor was it a work camp, since it was much too small to hold to these masses of people. (We are speaking here of the “extermination camp”, also called Treblinka 2. Hardly three kilometers away lay so-called Treblinka 1, which was quite undisputedly a work camp, and has never played any role in the holocaust literature.)
The transit camp theory is also supported by the fact that Jews are known to have been deported from Treblinka to other camps. Holocaust literature even mentions Jews who were transferred from Treblinka to Majdanek (29). Why all these unnecessary transports from one “extermination camp” to another?
Presumably, Treblinka served as a transit camp on the way to settlements located further east in the Baltic and White Russia); the existence of these settlements is admited even by authors like Reitlinger and Hilberg.
In our view, Sobibor and Belzec were transit camps, too; this is supported, among other things, by their location in the outermost east of the General Gouvernement. A clue to this possibility, with regards to Belzec, is furnished by a German document dated 17 March 1942, stating that the jews “were sent over the border and were not to come back” (30).
Chelmno was presumably a transit camp, too, and was located in the Warthegau; according to the Korherr report, many Jews were transferred from this area to the Eastern regions.
Did the Germans destroy the documents relating to these camps, as stated in Holocaust literature? We cannot exclude this possibility. But if so, why did they carelessly leave all the documentation from Auschwitz and Majdanek just lying around to be captured? It seems much more probable to us that the documents were either destroyed by the Soviets or the Poles, or that they were stored in a safe place because they contradicted the extermination legend. Some interesting revelations may be expected over the coming years.
Notes:
1) The first number is named by Lucy Dawidowicz (p. 191) and the second by Raul Hilberg (p. 956).
2) Reitlinger, p. 512.
3) Wolfgang Benz, (publisher), Dimension des Voelkermords, R. Oldenburg, 1991, p. 470.
4) Rudof In Gauss, Grundlagen… p. 276 ff.
5) Claude Lanzmann, Shoa, dtv, 1988, p. 17.
6) Wolfgang Scheffler, Judenverfolgung im Dritten Reich, Colloquium, 1964, p. 40.
7) Hilberg, p. 956.
8) Nuremberg document NO-482.
9) Alexander Pechersky, La rivolta di Sobibor, in Yuri Suhl, Ed essi si ribellarono, Milan, 1969, p. 31.
10) ibid.
11) Leon Poliakov, Breviare de la Haine, Editions complexe, Paris, 1986, p. 224.
12) Hilberg, p. 941.
13) Enzyklopaedie des Holocaust, p. 1496.
14) Compare, in this regard, the comments on Belzec in the next chapter (Six Million Miracles).
15) Reder’s book Belzec (Krakau, 1946) was summarized in Carlo Mattogno in Il rapporto Gerstein. Anatomia di un falso (Sentinella d’Italia, 1985, p. 129 ff).
16) Compare, in this regard, our book Der Holocaust auf dem Prufstand, 1992, p. 47, ff.
17) On the Demjanjuk trial, see Rullmann.
18) Vassili Grossmann, Die Hoelle von Treblinka, Verlag fuer fremdsprachige Literatur, Moscow, 1946, excerpts quoted in number 44 of Historische Tatsachen.,
19) Arnulf Neumaier in Gauss, Grundlagen… op. cit.
20) Yitzhak Arad, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka. The Operation Reinhard Death Camps, University Press, Bloomington USA, 1987, p. 174.
21) Jean-Francois Steiner, Treblinka, Die Revolte eines Vernichtungslagers, Gerhard Stalling Verlag, 1966, p. 294 ff.
22) See, in this regard, Neumaier in Gauss, Grundlagen…
23) Adalbert Rueckerl, Nationalsoczialistische Vernichtungslager im Spiegel deutscher Strafprozesse, dtv, 1977, p. 206.
24) FAZ, 2 April 1965.
25) Hans Peter Rullmann, Der Fall Demjanjuk, Verlag fuer ganzheitliche Forschung und Kultur, Vioel, 1987.
26) Friedrich Paul Berg in Gauss, Grundlagen…
27) See note 22.
28) Richard Glazar, Die Falle mit dem gruenen Zaun, Fischer, 1992, p. 126.
29) Alexander Donat (publisher), The Death Camp Treblinka, Holocaust Library, New York, 1979, p. 24.
30) Reuter-Memorandum of 17 March 1942, published by Helmut Schwege, Kennzeichen J, Berlin (Ost), 1966, p. 243.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-11-30--Over Half of Young American Adults Now Live With Their Parents

In the last few decades , young adults have faced harsh economic realities – from the financial crisis in 2008 to this year ’ s global pandemic , both triggering catastrophic losses in jobs and financial stability .
And while the widespread effects of COVID-19 have yet to be fully captured , Visual Capitalist ’ s Aran Ali notes that young adults are already now living with their parents to a greater degree than witnessed in 120 years – surpassing even the Depression-era generation .
Young adults today are categorized as either late Millennials and Gen-Zers .
For them , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the list of financial hardships they ’ ve been up against , such as a precarious job market and the rising cost of living .
Failure to Launch : But Why ?
There are a few possible factors that could explain the increase in young adults living with their parents .
1 .
The lackluster job market The barista or server with multiple degrees has become a common portrayal of the struggling millennial .
Despite the less than rosy outcomes , it has not been for want of trying .
Younger people today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history .
Unfortunately , a degree does not map out a path to success the way it did for prior generations .
2 .
Tying the knot later Today , people get married nearly a decade later than prior historical averages , and many young adults are opting to stay with their parents until they tie the knot .
It ’ s also worth noting that as time goes on , young adults are getting married at lower rates than in the past .

By Tyler Durden
In the last few decades, young adults have faced harsh economic realities – from the financial crisis in 2008 to this year’s global pandemic, both triggering catastrophic losses in jobs and financial stability.
And while the widespread effects of COVID-19 have yet to be fully captured, Visual Capitalist’s Aran Ali notes that young adults are already now living with their parents to a greater degree than witnessed in 120 years – surpassing even the Depression-era generation.
Young adults today are categorized as either late Millennials and Gen-Zers. For them, COVID-19 has just been another addition to the list of financial hardships they’ve been up against, such as a precarious job market and the rising cost of living.
Source: Pew Research Center
Failure to Launch: But Why?
There are a few possible factors that could explain the increase in young adults living with their parents.
1. The lackluster job market
The barista or server with multiple degrees has become a common portrayal of the struggling millennial. Despite the less than rosy outcomes, it has not been for want of trying. Younger people today are actually the most educated generation in history. Unfortunately, a degree does not map out a path to success the way it did for prior generations.
2. Tying the knot later
Today, people get married nearly a decade later than prior historical averages, and many young adults are opting to stay with their parents until they tie the knot. It’s also worth noting that as time goes on, young adults are getting married at lower rates than in the past.
Top image: Pixabay
Source: Zero Hedge
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-30--BJJ vs. Kidnapper – What Really Happened in the Viral Video?

I disagree with the whole “ love your enemy ” nonsense at the end .
I am using this to @ @ @ @ @ a threat without potentially catching a charge and ending up in jail .

I disagree with the whole "love your enemy" nonsense at the end. I am using this to demonstrate how one can subdue a threat without potentially catching a charge and ending up in jail.


renegadetribune--2020-12-01--Tony Blinken Replaces Mike Pompeo

Tony Blinken Replaces Mike Pompeo

I for one am getting really excited by the staff that Honest Joe Biden is pulling together for the White House .
When I first heard the name Tony Blinken during the Obama kleptocracy I assumed that he was one of those Ivy League lawyer types that proliferate in Washington , likely affiliated with the firm of Winken , Blinken and Nod , which we all know to be in partnership with Dewey , Cheatem and Howe .
But I was wrong .
He actually was affiliated to a much bigger fraternity , which one might call Zionists in government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ educated , always polite Jewish boys and sometimes girls who have self-designated as foreign policy experts and who work their way up through the various levels of power that might lead to the most coveted positions at the top in the state department and national security apparatus .
Blinken was one such striver , and I began to feel the pricking in my thumbs that was telling me that something evil this way was coming when he was mentioned now and again as a former close adviser to the already beatified Barack Obama @ @ @ @ @ @ @ observed with approval that he had more recently been briefing Joe Biden , particularly about Israel and the Middle East .
In an interview in the Times of Israel Blinken confirmed Biden ’ s position on possibly reducing aid to Israel if the Jewish state were to do things that damaged U.S. interests .
Blinken “ …reiterated Biden ’ s position that he would not condition aid to Israel .
He [ Biden ] is resolutely opposed to it .
He would not tie military assistance to Israel to any political decisions it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of withholding aid is itself moot as Israel does nothing but “ do things ” that damage U.S. interests , knowing that no president or the Congress would dare to turn off the money tap , but it is an interesting unambiguous admission from Blinken that both he and Joe Biden put Israeli interests ahead of those of the United States .
Blinken ’ s personal view of unfettered support for Israel allegedly derives from his stepfather having claimed to be a survivor of the so-called holocaust , a tale that he invoked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ November 24th .
The Times interview concludes with Blinken asserting that “ One of the things that ’ s really shaped the vice president ’ s… career-long support for Israel and its security is the lesson of the Holocaust .
He believes strongly that a secure Jewish homeland in Israel is the single best guarantee to ensure that never again will the Jewish people be threatened with destruction.
” The indefatigable Israel-firster Tony Blinken has also served as a “ conduit ” to those in government for Israel advocacy groups like the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And now that we have Tony Blinken as Secretary of State Designate the door will soon be wide open to the Israel Lobby .
If you need to know more about what Tony Blinken is all about you only have to look at his friends and his track record .
Israel was inevitably quick off the mark in saluting the appointment , both in its media and through its mouthpieces in the United States .
Stalwart Canadian Zionist Mark Dubowitz , who heads the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies ( FDD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ part of a “ …superb national security team .
The country will be very fortunate to have them in public service.
” The signal from FDD is particularly important as the organization is directed by the Israeli Embassy in Washington .
FDD is the leading neoconservative bastion seeking a war with Iran , Israel ’ s bête noir .
Its Leadership Council has featured former CIA Director James Woolsey , Senator Joe Lieberman , and Bill Kristol .
Its advisors and experts are mostly Jewish and most of its funding comes from Jewish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposed how FDD and other Lobby groups work directly with the Israeli government , collecting information on U.S. citizens , spying on legal organizations , and both planning and executing disinformation at Israeli direction , making it an Israeli agent by the definition of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 ( FARA ) .
Unfortunately , the Department of Justice has never sought to compel FDD to register under FARA .
In fact , the U.S. government has never compelled any part of the vast and powerful Israel Lobby to register .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a JD from Columbia who has never served in the U.S. military , is inevitably a chicken-hawk because that is what America ’ s Zionists and their political neocon wing are made of .
It is a phenomenon that has often been noted .
In 2017 , Israel ’ s Deputy Prime Minister Tzipi Hotovely called out American Jews as “ people that never send their children to fight for their country , most of the Jews don ’ t have children serving as soldiers , going to the Marines , going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them are having quite convenient lives… ” Of 1,300,000 active duty personnel in the U.S. armed forces , only 4,515 are Jewish .
This is how it works : instead of actually fighting in the wars you are promoting , you have your tax-exempt “ educational foundations ” pour tons of money into a project to go to war and corrupt the politicians to issue the necessary orders so unemployed kids from Arkansas and North Dakota can go off and die for Israel .
You yourself remain safe at home , free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threatens the world through its “ meddling ” in the Middle East .
And , of course , about how the dumbass Palestinians have failed to accept the hand of Israel offered in peace .
That is what Tony ’ s record demonstrates .
Blinken has come a long way with Biden , all the way back to the Clinton Administration .
And he has always been there for the Jewish state .
During the Obama Administration when relations with Israel were often strained , Blinken was the contact point for “ Jewish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the White House at the time who weren ’ t as sympathetic to Israel ’ s position.
” Dennis Ross , often described as Israel ’ s lawyer , praises him for having “ …an instinctive emotional attachment to Israel , ” referring to Blinken ’ s frequently cited Jewish and refugee roots .
Other media reporting indicates that “ Blinken was a top aide to Biden when the then-Senator voted to authorize the U.S. invasion of Iraq , and Blinken helped Biden develop a proposal to partition Iraq into three separate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As deputy national security adviser , Blinken supported the disastrous military intervention in Libya in 2011 , and in 2018 he helped launch WestExec Advisors , a  ‘ strategic advisory firm ’ that is secretive about its clients , along with other Obama administration alumni like Michèle Flournoy .
Jonathan Guyer writes in The American Prospect ,  ‘ I learned that Blinken and Flournoy used their networks to build a large client base at the intersection of tech and defense .
An Israeli surveillance startup turned to them .
So @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beyond the intersection of government policy and personal profit exhibited by Blinken , the Washington Post in 2013 described Blinken as “ [ o ] ne of the government ’ s key players in drafting Syria policy ” and he recalled that “ This is a little bit personal to me , and any of us — and I start with myself — who had any responsibility for our Syria policy in the last administration has to acknowledge that we failed .
Not for want of trying , but we failed.
” What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s legitimate government and turning the country over to the terrorist linked groups that he and Hillary and Obama were supporting .
The Democrats are particularly good at coming up with secretaries of state that one would like to forget , and that is saying quite a lot given the recent appointees by the Republicans .
One recalls immediately the big-hearted Madeleine Albright , who found the killing of 500,000 Iraqi children by sanctions “ worth it , ” or Hillary Clinton , who laughed out loud as she recalled the death of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bayonet inserted up his anus .
Clinton , who more than anyone launched the war against Africa ’ s most developed nation , paraphrased Julius Caesar , who , upon returning from a rapid victory in Asia during the Rome ’ s Second Civil war , described the event as “ Veni , vidi , vici , ” in English “ I came , I saw , I conquered.
” For the laughing Hillary it was “ I came , I saw , he died !
” The anarchy in Libya persists to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killing of four U.S. Embassy employees in Benghazi in 2012 , with Hillary and Susan Rice at the helm .
It is generally believed that both Clinton and Rice might well have senior positions in the incoming Biden Administration .
But back to Blinken .
Israel loved the way the Trump Administration showered favors upon it , nearly always without any quid pro quo .
But for all his Dispensationalist fervor , salesmen like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were little more than goys who had been seduced by the myth of Israel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have described it , little more than “ useful idiots , ” which is allegedly an expression that certain Israeli politicians have used to describe their passionate Christian Zionist supporters in the U.S. Now , with Blinken , the Israeli hard liners will have the “ real thing , ” a convincing Jewish boy who fatuously describes an apartheid Israel as “ the anchor and foundation for democracy in the region.
” Tony believes in the Zionist cause and will do the Jewish state ’ s bidding with a malleable Joe Biden .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is always Kamala Harris , who is married to a Jewish lawyer lobbyist .
Win-win either way .
Even though it ’ s early days , Blinken joins a number of other American Jews already tagged for senior positions , including Alejandro Mayorkas , the nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security who is a Latino Jew .
Ron Klain , Biden ’ s Chief of Staff and Janet Yellen , his pick for Treasury Secretary , are also Jewish .
The liberal Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports how “ Having Jewish men and women @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it ’ s barely even a talking point… ” before observing that “ The fact that some of President-elect Joe Biden ’ s top cabinet picks are Jewish should be a source of pride for the community… ‘ These people are being chosen because they ’ re incredibly competent , because they ’ re incredibly talented , because they ’ re incredibly experienced , ’ Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt told Haaretz in a phone interview.
” Indeed , if one believes Greenblatt pressure from the Israel Lobby , the media and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Jewish mafia inside the government itself have nothing to do with it .
Philip M. Giraldi , Ph.D. , is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest , a 501 ( c ) 3 tax deductible educational foundation ( Federal ID Number # 52-1739023 ) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East .
Website is https : //councilforthenationalinterest.org , address is P.O .
Box 2157 , Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform @ cnionline.org .

By Philip Giraldi
I for one am getting really excited by the staff that Honest Joe Biden is pulling together for the White House. When I first heard the name Tony Blinken during the Obama kleptocracy I assumed that he was one of those Ivy League lawyer types that proliferate in Washington, likely affiliated with the firm of Winken, Blinken and Nod, which we all know to be in partnership with Dewey, Cheatem and Howe. But I was wrong. He actually was affiliated to a much bigger fraternity, which one might call Zionists in government. You know, those nice well educated, always polite Jewish boys and sometimes girls who have self-designated as foreign policy experts and who work their way up through the various levels of power that might lead to the most coveted positions at the top in the state department and national security apparatus. Blinken was one such striver, and I began to feel the pricking in my thumbs that was telling me that something evil this way was coming when he was mentioned now and again as a former close adviser to the already beatified Barack Obama. And some in the media had observed with approval that he had more recently been briefing Joe Biden, particularly about Israel and the Middle East.
In an interview in the Times of Israel Blinken confirmed Biden’s position on possibly reducing aid to Israel if the Jewish state were to do things that damaged U.S. interests. Blinken “…reiterated Biden’s position that he would not condition aid to Israel. He [Biden] is resolutely opposed to it. He would not tie military assistance to Israel to any political decisions it makes, full stop.”
The question of withholding aid is itself moot as Israel does nothing but “do things” that damage U.S. interests, knowing that no president or the Congress would dare to turn off the money tap, but it is an interesting unambiguous admission from Blinken that both he and Joe Biden put Israeli interests ahead of those of the United States.
Blinken’s personal view of unfettered support for Israel allegedly derives from his stepfather having claimed to be a survivor of the so-called holocaust, a tale that he invoked several times during his acceptance speech on November 24th. The Times interview concludes with Blinken asserting that “One of the things that’s really shaped the vice president’s… career-long support for Israel and its security is the lesson of the Holocaust. He believes strongly that a secure Jewish homeland in Israel is the single best guarantee to ensure that never again will the Jewish people be threatened with destruction.”
The indefatigable Israel-firster Tony Blinken has also served as a “conduit” to those in government for Israel advocacy groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). And now that we have Tony Blinken as Secretary of State Designate the door will soon be wide open to the Israel Lobby.
If you need to know more about what Tony Blinken is all about you only have to look at his friends and his track record. Israel was inevitably quick off the mark in saluting the appointment, both in its media and through its mouthpieces in the United States. Stalwart Canadian Zionist Mark Dubowitz, who heads the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), tweeted that Blinken would be part of a “…superb national security team. The country will be very fortunate to have them in public service.”
The signal from FDD is particularly important as the organization is directed by the Israeli Embassy in Washington. FDD is the leading neoconservative bastion seeking a war with Iran, Israel’s bête noir. Its Leadership Council has featured former CIA Director James Woolsey, Senator Joe Lieberman, and Bill Kristol. Its advisors and experts are mostly Jewish and most of its funding comes from Jewish oligarchs.
A recent expose by al-Jazeera exposed how FDD and other Lobby groups work directly with the Israeli government, collecting information on U.S. citizens, spying on legal organizations, and both planning and executing disinformation at Israeli direction, making it an Israeli agent by the definition of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (FARA). Unfortunately, the Department of Justice has never sought to compel FDD to register under FARA. In fact, the U.S. government has never compelled any part of the vast and powerful Israel Lobby to register.
Tony, inevitably a Harvard graduate plus a JD from Columbia who has never served in the U.S. military, is inevitably a chicken-hawk because that is what America’s Zionists and their political neocon wing are made of. It is a phenomenon that has often been noted. In 2017, Israel’s Deputy Prime Minister Tzipi Hotovely called out American Jews as “people that never send their children to fight for their country, most of the Jews don’t have children serving as soldiers, going to the Marines, going to Afghanistan, or to Iraq. Most of them are having quite convenient lives…” Of 1,300,000 active duty personnel in the U.S. armed forces, only 4,515 are Jewish.
This is how it works: instead of actually fighting in the wars you are promoting, you have your tax-exempt “educational foundations” pour tons of money into a project to go to war and corrupt the politicians to issue the necessary orders so unemployed kids from Arkansas and North Dakota can go off and die for Israel. You yourself remain safe at home, free to deliver bellicose speeches about how Iran threatens the world through its “meddling” in the Middle East. And, of course, about how the dumbass Palestinians have failed to accept the hand of Israel offered in peace.
That is what Tony’s record demonstrates. Blinken has come a long way with Biden, all the way back to the Clinton Administration. And he has always been there for the Jewish state. During the Obama Administration when relations with Israel were often strained, Blinken was the contact point for “Jewish leaders [differentiating] him from others in the White House at the time who weren’t as sympathetic to Israel’s position.” Dennis Ross, often described as Israel’s lawyer, praises him for having “…an instinctive emotional attachment to Israel,” referring to Blinken’s frequently cited Jewish and refugee roots.
Other media reporting indicates that “Blinken was a top aide to Biden when the then-Senator voted to authorize the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and Blinken helped Biden develop a proposal to partition Iraq into three separate regions based on ethnic and sectarian identity. As deputy national security adviser, Blinken supported the disastrous military intervention in Libya in 2011, and in 2018 he helped launch WestExec Advisors, a ‘strategic advisory firm’ that is secretive about its clients, along with other Obama administration alumni like Michèle Flournoy. Jonathan Guyer writes in The American Prospect, ‘I learned that Blinken and Flournoy used their networks to build a large client base at the intersection of tech and defense. An Israeli surveillance startup turned to them. So did a major U.S. defense company.”
Beyond the intersection of government policy and personal profit exhibited by Blinken, the Washington Post in 2013 described Blinken as “[o]ne of the government’s key players in drafting Syria policy” and he recalled that “This is a little bit personal to me, and any of us — and I start with myself — who had any responsibility for our Syria policy in the last administration has to acknowledge that we failed. Not for want of trying, but we failed.” What Tony failed at was overthrowing Syria’s legitimate government and turning the country over to the terrorist linked groups that he and Hillary and Obama were supporting.
The Democrats are particularly good at coming up with secretaries of state that one would like to forget, and that is saying quite a lot given the recent appointees by the Republicans. One recalls immediately the big-hearted Madeleine Albright, who found the killing of 500,000 Iraqi children by sanctions “worth it,” or Hillary Clinton, who laughed out loud as she recalled the death of Libya ruler Muammar Ghaddafi by having a bayonet inserted up his anus. Clinton, who more than anyone launched the war against Africa’s most developed nation, paraphrased Julius Caesar, who, upon returning from a rapid victory in Asia during the Rome’s Second Civil war, described the event as “Veni, vidi, vici,” in English “I came, I saw, I conquered.” For the laughing Hillary it was “I came, I saw, he died!” The anarchy in Libya persists to this day and it included the payback killing of four U.S. Embassy employees in Benghazi in 2012, with Hillary and Susan Rice at the helm. It is generally believed that both Clinton and Rice might well have senior positions in the incoming Biden Administration.
But back to Blinken. Israel loved the way the Trump Administration showered favors upon it, nearly always without any quid pro quo. But for all his Dispensationalist fervor, salesmen like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were little more than goys who had been seduced by the myth of Israel. They were, as Lenin would have described it, little more than “useful idiots,” which is allegedly an expression that certain Israeli politicians have used to describe their passionate Christian Zionist supporters in the U.S. Now, with Blinken, the Israeli hard liners will have the “real thing,” a convincing Jewish boy who fatuously describes an apartheid Israel as “the anchor and foundation for democracy in the region.” Tony believes in the Zionist cause and will do the Jewish state’s bidding with a malleable Joe Biden. And if Joe should go, there is always Kamala Harris, who is married to a Jewish lawyer lobbyist. Win-win either way.
Even though it’s early days, Blinken joins a number of other American Jews already tagged for senior positions, including Alejandro Mayorkas, the nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security who is a Latino Jew. Ron Klain, Biden’s Chief of Staff and Janet Yellen, his pick for Treasury Secretary, are also Jewish. The liberal Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports how “Having Jewish men and women in prominent government positions is so standard that it’s barely even a talking point…” before observing that “The fact that some of President-elect Joe Biden’s top cabinet picks are Jewish should be a source of pride for the community…‘These people are being chosen because they’re incredibly competent, because they’re incredibly talented, because they’re incredibly experienced,’ Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt told Haaretz in a phone interview.” Indeed, if one believes Greenblatt pressure from the Israel Lobby, the media and billionaire donors as well as networking by the Jewish mafia inside the government itself have nothing to do with it.
Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is https://councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform@cnionline.org.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


Christmas Masking

From an article by Mr. T. M. Fallow in The Antiquary , May , 1895 .
We have already seen a good deal of masking in connection with St. Nicholas , Knecht Ruprecht , and other figures of the German Christmas ; we may next give some attention to English customs of the same sort during the Twelve Days , and then pass on to the strange burlesque ceremonies of the Feast of Fools and the Boy Bishop , ceremonies which show an intrusion of pagan mummery into the sanctuary itself .
The custom of Christmas masking , “ mumming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be traced at the English court as early as the reign of Edward III .
It is in all probability connected with that wearing of beasts ’ heads and skins of which we have already noted various examples—its origin in folk-custom seems to have been the coming of a band of worshippers clad in this uncouth but auspicious garb to bring good luck to a house .
The most direct English survival is found in the village mummers who still call themselves “ guisers ” or “ geese-dancers ” and claim the right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be dealt with shortly , after a consideration of more courtly customs of the same kind .
In the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries the English court masque reached its greatest developments ; the fundamental idea was then generally overlaid with splendid trappings , the dresses and the arrangements were often extremely elaborate , and the introduction of dialogued speech made these “ disguises ” regular dramatic performances .
A notable example is Ben Jonson ’ s “ Masque of Christmas.
” 14-2 Shakespeare , however , gives us in “ Henry VIII.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ impromptu form : the king and a party dressed up as shepherds break in upon a banquet of Wolsey ’ s .
In this volume we are more concerned with the popular Christmas than with the festivities of kings and courts and grandees .
Mention must , however , be made of a personage who played an important part in the Christmas of the Tudor court and appeared also in colleges , Inns of Court , and the houses of the nobility—the “ Lord of Misrule.
” He was annually elected to preside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of courtiers , and was surrounded by elaborate ceremonial .
He seems to be the equivalent and was probably the direct descendant of the “ Abbot ” or “ Bishop ” of the Feast of Fools , who will be noticed later in this chapter .
Sometimes indeed he is actually called “ Abbot of Misrule.
” A parallel to him is the Twelfth Night “ king , ” and he appears to be a courtly example of the temporary monarch of folk-custom , though his name is sometimes extended to “ kings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by court or gentry but by the common people .
The “ Lord of Misrule ” was among the relics of paganism most violently attacked by Puritan writers like Stubbes and Prynne , and the Great Rebellion seems to have been the death of him .

From an article by Mr. T. M. Fallow in The Antiquary, May, 1895.
We have already seen a good deal of masking in connection with St. Nicholas, Knecht Ruprecht, and other figures of the German Christmas; we may next give some attention to English customs of the same sort during the Twelve Days, and then pass on to the strange burlesque ceremonies of the Feast of Fools and the Boy Bishop, ceremonies which show an intrusion of pagan mummery into the sanctuary itself.
The custom of Christmas masking, “mumming,” or “disguising” can be traced at the English court as early as the reign of Edward III. It is in all probability connected with that wearing of beasts’ heads and skins of which we have already noted various examples—its origin in folk-custom seems to have been the coming of a band of worshippers clad in this uncouth but auspicious garb to bring good luck to a house. The most direct English survival is found in the village mummers who still call themselves “guisers” or “geese-dancers” and claim the right to enter every house. These will be dealt with shortly, after a consideration of more courtly customs of the same kind.
In the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries the English court masque reached its greatest developments; the fundamental idea was then generally overlaid with splendid trappings, the dresses and the arrangements were often extremely elaborate, and the introduction of dialogued speech made these “disguises” regular dramatic performances. A notable example is Ben Jonson’s “Masque of Christmas.” 14-2 Shakespeare, however, gives us in “Henry VIII.” 14-3 an example of a simpler impromptu form: the king and a party dressed up as shepherds break in upon a banquet of Wolsey’s.
In this volume we are more concerned with the popular Christmas than with the festivities of kings and courts and grandees. Mention must, however, be made of a personage who played an important part in the Christmas of the Tudor court and appeared also in colleges, Inns of Court, and the houses of the nobility—the “Lord of Misrule.” He was annually elected to preside over the revels, had a retinue of courtiers, and was surrounded by elaborate ceremonial. He seems to be the equivalent and was probably the direct descendant of the “Abbot” or “Bishop” of the Feast of Fools, who will be noticed later in this chapter. Sometimes indeed he is actually called “Abbot of Misrule.” A parallel to him is the Twelfth Night “king,” and he appears to be a courtly example of the temporary monarch of folk-custom, though his name is sometimes extended to “kings” of quite vulgar origin elected not by court or gentry but by the common people. The “Lord of Misrule” was among the relics of paganism most violently attacked by Puritan writers like Stubbes and Prynne, and the Great Rebellion seems to have been the death of him.
Read the whole article.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-12-01--Hebrew Hasbara: Is Communism jewish?

Hebrew Hasbara: Is Communism jewish?

Why did Russian jews support the Bolshevik revolution ?
Professor Glenn Dynner explains .

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


The Vaccinator

This a fun little parody of a Prodigy song , featuring our good old buddy Bill Gates and his plot @ @ @ @ @ vaccines .


renegadetribune--2020-12-02--Tim Pool and Luke Rudkowski Gush Over Heshy Tischler, Brooklyn’s Orthodox jewish Activist

Heshy Tischler is an Orthodox jew who has made his opposition to the COVID-19 lockdown of his community very public @ @ @ @ @ great PR to make him and his fellow tribesmen seem like great freedom fighters against @ @ @ @ @ Pool interviewing Teshy about his “ HUGE win.
” And here is Luke Rudkowski of @ @ @ @ @ later that same day .
This is obviously an orchestrated PR campaign .
It follows @ @ @ @ @ sending $ 15k to a Brooklyn synagogue .

Heshy Tischler is an Orthodox jew who has made his opposition to the COVID-19 lockdown of his community very public. Now there is some great PR to make him and his fellow tribesmen seem like great freedom fighters against tyranny.
Here is Tim Pool interviewing Teshy about his “HUGE win.”
Bitchute link
And here is Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change interviewing Heshy later that same day.
Bitchute link
This is obviously an orchestrated PR campaign. It follows on the heels of TruNews sending $15k to a Brooklyn synagogue.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/trunews-sends-15000-of-their-donors-money-to-brooklyn-synagogue/
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt