renegadetribune--2020-03-11--The Lies of Christopher Bjerknes, Part 2

This article will serve as a follow up piece to my first article debunking the lies of the huckster , Christopher Bjerknes .
However , this article will focus mainly on the debate the lying fraud Bjerknes had with Dennis Wise on Adam Greens show .
If any of you have not listened to that disaster of a debate , it might behoove you to do so just to get a glimpse of the arrogance and lies of Bjerknes , but be warned , it ’ s very hard to listen to .
I will give Adam Green due credit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sincerely hope to clear up some points that were missed , It was an opportunity for productive discussion but it seemed to have devolved into a disorganized mess .
Mainly because Bjerknes is an arrogant and petulant child that continued to yell , insult and hang up .
What was lost in translation can be clarified here .
This will be a rather lengthy article , and spans many diverse topics but should be interesting to those of you who are aware of Bjerknes lies .
A third installment after this one will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the debate .
In this article , we will journey down a list of bogus claims and distortions made by Bjerknes during his debate and astutely fact-check him so that we can all clearly see , Christopher Jon Bjerknes is an absolute liar , conman and huckster .
The first claim that Bjerknes the liar brought up was one Hjalmar Schact , the president of the Reichsbank , who he claimed was a Freemason working for the Zionist bankers .
This was allegedly , according to Bjerknes , part of the Zionist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What was NOT mentioned by the fraud Bjerknes , is what actually became of Hjalmar Schacht .
Not only was he DISMISSED from the Reichsbank by Adolf Hitler in 1939 and replaced by Walther Funk ( who then began implemented Gottfried Feders economic theory , something the Rothschild agent Schacht vehemently vetoed ) He was soon after ARRESTED and placed in a German concentration camp !
.
Lets examine this further , and you will instantly understand why the lying fraud Bjerknes made sure to leave this part out .
“ In 1939 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who had served in 1932 as deputy chairman of the NSDAP ’ s economic council under the chairmanship of Feder .
The replacement of Schacht by Funk working under the direction of Göring the head of the Four Year Plan , seems to be an indication that a transitional phase had been completed and that the Government was well aware of Schacht ’ s role as an agent for international capital .
Otto D. Tolischus , writing from Berlin for The New York Times , commented : “ Dr .
Schacht was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reached the limit in debt-making and currency-expansion , that any further expansion spelled danger to the economic system , for which he still considered himself responsible , and that the government would have to curtail its ambitions and confine itself to the nation ’ s means… No authoritative explanation of the new financial policy is available so far , but judging from hints in the highest quarters , the policy is likely to proceed about as follows : Expand the currency circulation only for current exchange demands and not for special purposes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and make private industry finance many tasks hitherto financed by the state , either directly or by prices on public orders , which have enabled industry to finance the expansion of new Four-Year Plan factories out of accumulated profits and reserves .
Create a non-interest bearing credit instrument with which the state , now having to share the capital market with private enterprise , will finance its own further orders in anticipation of increasing tax receipts from the resulting expansion of production .
In one respect therefore , Herr Funk presumably will continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ orders as did Dr. Schacht , but whereas Dr. Schacht did it with bills , loans , delivery certificates and other credit instruments , all of which cost between 4½ and 5 per cent interest per year , Herr Funk proposes doing it with non-interest-eating instruments .
How that is to be done is his secret , but the mere mention of interest-free credit instruments inevitably recalls the plan of Gottfried Feder which at one time fascinated Chancellor Hitler , but which Dr Schacht vetoed.
” As we see clearly , Bjerknes the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Schacht and his replacement with a true National Socialist economic theoretician to begin implementing non-interest bearing currency .
Bjerknes does not mention this because it does not fit his bogus narrative of “ Schacht was a Zionist banker controlling Hitler ” .
Soon after this , Hjalmar Schacht was involved in trying to help ASSASSINATE Hitler , and was soon arrested and imprisoned !
“ After the attempt on Hitler ’ s life on 20 July 1944 , Schacht was arrested on 23 July .
He was sent to Ravensbrück , then to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In late April 1945 he and about 140 other prominent inmates of Dachau were transferred to Tyrol by the SS , which left them there .
They were liberated by the Fifth U.S. Army on 5 May 1945 in Niederdorf , South Tyrol , Dolomites , Italy ” But wait , it gets even better : “ Schacht was said to be in contact with the German resistance as early as 1934 , though at that time he still believed the Nazi regime would follow his policies .
By 1938 , he was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the plans for a coup d ’ état against Hitler if he started a war against Czechoslovakia .
Goerdeler , his colleague in 1935–36 , was the civilian leader of resistance to Hitler .
Schacht talked frequently with Hans Gisevius , another resistance figure ; when resistance organizer Theodor Strünck ’ s house ( a frequent meeting place ) was bombed out , Schacht allowed Strünck and his wife to live in a villa he owned.
” So wait a minute , Bjerknes , why would Hjalmar Schacht be conspiring with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to overthrow Hitler if Hitler was allegedly a puppet ?
Explanation please !
Furthermore , we will examine Hjalmar Schachts own book “ The Magic of Money ” to understand what his true motives really were !
“ Schacht , with his connections in England and the United States , was bent on hindering Germany ’ s rearmament because he was disloyal .
He admitted this in his book , The Magic of Money ( 1967 ) .
An American diplomat , Donald R. Heath , wrote to Schacht in 1959 to inform @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his collaboration with the U.S. government during the war : “ I told [ American prosecutor Robert ] Jackson not only should you never have been brought before that tribunal but that you had consistently been working for the downfall of the Nazi regime .
I told him that I had been in touch with you consistently during the first part of the war and Under Secretary of State Wells through me , and that you had passed on to me information adverse to the Nazi cause… .
[ D. Heath quoted by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 1967 ) , p. 107 ] ” Clearly we see Hjalmar Schacht was acting as a covert saboteur on behalf of international finance , NOT Hitlers handler !
Perhaps the lying fraud Bjerknes would like to clarify why Hjalmar Schact was removed from the Reichsbank and replaced by a student of Feder , if Hitlers economic recovery was guided by Masonic bankers ?
Or perhaps the lying fraud Bjerknes can attempt to answer why Schacht was conspiring with the German resistance to overthrow Hitler if Schacht was allegedly Hitlers controller ?
Please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you shameless lying fraud , because inquiring minds want to know !
As an addition we will examine how after Hjalmar Schact was gone , Walther Funk began implementing a true anti-globalist finance economic plan .
“ Broadly , it seems that Feder ’ s ideas were being implemented .
The NSDAP broke the bondage of the international gold merchants .
Germany created an autarchic trading bloc both before and during the war , based on barter through a Reich clearing center .
Pegging national currencies to the Reichsmark resulted in immediate wage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bank for International Settlements Annual Report for 1940-1941 quoted finance spokesmen from Fascist Italy and the Third Reich : “ The development of clearings in Europe has given rise to certain fears with regard to the future position of gold as an element in the monetary structure .
It has since been noted that Germany has been able to finance rearmament and war with very slight gold reserves and that the foreign trade of Germany and Italy has been carried on largely on a clearing basis .
Hence the question is being asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ developed which will altogether dispense with the services of gold .
In authoritative statements made on this subject in Germany and Italy a distinction is drawn between different functions of gold .
The president of the German Reichsbank said in a speech on 26 July 1940 that “ in any case in the future gold will play no role as a basis of European currencies , for a currency is not dependent upon its cover but on the value which is given to it by the state , i.e .
by the economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ It is , ” he added , “ another matter whether gold should be regarded as a suitable medium for the settlement of debit balances between countries , but we shall never pursue a monetary policy which makes us in any way dependent upon gold , for it is impossible to tie oneself to a medium the value of which one can not determine oneself.
” This is an important aspect that Bjerknes the lying fraud addresses nowhere , the fact that Hitler implemented an interest free currency system to bypass the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Funk .
Bjerknes the lying fraud must avoid this pertinent issue because it flatly debunks his narrative as “ Hitler a communist working for the bankers ” .
For a further more in-depth breakdown of Hitlers economic system , the book “ Hitlers Revolution ” by Richard Tedor is a must read .
Moving onto the second lie spouted by the fraud Bjerknes during the interview was in reference to yet again the usual “ Zionist bankers funding Hitler ” claim .
In particular Bjerknes mentions two banks .
Kuhn , Loeb & @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this we will refer back to James Poole ’ s book “ Who Financed Hitler ” for reference .
The truth is much different than what the lying fraud Bjerknes claims.\ Montague Norman who was not Jewish , was the governor of the Bank of England for 24 years , was anti-France , disliked Jews immensely , was opposed to Versailles , and favored Germany due to his earlier studies there lent money to the NSDAP after 1933 .
However , the accusation that money was funneled from Baron Kurt von Schröder and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is NOT proven .
Schröder was a German partner in J. H. Stein .
A gentile Englishmen , who was anti-communist lent money , but no evidence exists to support the Kurt von Schröder and J.H .
Stein theory .
However Anthony Sutton who DOES support the Kurt von Schroder theory in his book “ Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler ” says the following ; “ Schröder had organized the banking firm of J. Henry Schröder in London and J. Henry Schröder Banking Corporation in New York… in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ funnelled to Heinrich Himmler ’ s SS organization in 1944 , while World War II was in progress and the United States was at war with Germany.
” First problem with that claim , Bjerknes says J.H .
Stein financed Hitlers early rise to power , not late war financing so the dates are confused .
Second problem , by 1944 Germany had already long since switched out its currency methods and no longer utilized gold as an exchange medium , so essentially any money “ transferred ” to Germany would have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ German bank .
Third problem , the entire weight of Suttons book “ Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler ” relies heavily and shoddy second-hand sources , particularly the Fritz Thyssen memoirs and “ Hitlers Secret Backers ” .
We will review the shoddiness of these sources as reviewed by Yale scholar Henry Ashby Turner , but first a little introduction to Mr. Turner : “ Turner , who spent 1954–1955 as a Fulbright scholar at the University of Munich and the University of Berlin , knew German and exhaustively examined original @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , trade associations , and the Nazi Party .
( Some of his scholarly work was written and published in German . )
Unsurprisingly for anyone who has read David Irving , Turner notes that the documentary sources he consulted had been ignored by other historians .
Mostly Turner cites original documents : “ Only in the case of impeccable scholarly editions have I relied on published versions of materials I originally used in archival form ” ( p. xv ) .
” Mr. Turner goes on to review Suttons sources ; Although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporter of Hitler , Turner was aware that his book I Paid Hitler ( 1941 ) is unreliable .
He calls it “ purported memoirs ” “ ghostwritten ” by the “ Hungarian ” Emery Reves .
( He does not reveal that Reves was actually a well-connected Jewish propagandist . )
Turner wrote a German paper on the subject , “ Fritz Thyssen und ‘ I Paid Hitler ’ , ” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 19 ( 1971 ) .
“ Antony C. Sutton ’ s “ Wall Street and the Rise of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bogus memoirs attributed to Thyssen , but other fraudulent “ authorities ” such as Jewish journalist Ladislas Farago .
His untenable thesis is the same as Leftists ’ and Jews ’ : “ The contribution made by American capitalism to German war preparations before 1940 can only be described as phenomenal ” — “ certainly crucial to German military capabilities.
” The final summation of Bjerknes lies and distortions ; an anti-communist English Gentile , Montague Norman donated money but their is zero evidence to support the J.H .
Stein theory , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theory have based their “ research ” on either ghost written anonymous authors or actual Jewish newspaper propagandists .
Kuhn , Loeb & Co. was Jacob Schiffs bank , the lying fraud Bjerknes knows very well the “ Schiff financed Hitler ” myth is baseless and long since debunked , so perhaps if Bjerknes uses the bank name “ Kuhn , Loeb & Co. ” he might be able to confuse and throw people off who were not familiar with the actual name of Jacob Schiffs banking firm .
But just for some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face , the reality was that Schiff and his Kuhn , Loeb & Co. were at the forefront for agitating for war against Hitler in a campaign literally entitled : “ Stop Hitler Now !
” “ Senator Rush D. Holt , a liberal pacifist , during the last session of the 76th Congress , exposed the oligarchs promoting belligerence against Germany .
Commenting on an influential committee , Defend America by Aiding the Allies , headed by newspaperman William Allen White , to agitate for war against Germany , or at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Britain , Senator Holt said the founders included “ eighteen prominent bankers.
” Among those present at its April 1940 founding were Henry L. Stimson , who had served as counsel for J. P. Morgan and senior Morgan partner Thomas W. Lamont .
The campaign began on June 10 , 1940 , with advertisements entitled “ Stop Hitler Now ” appearing in newspapers throughout the USA .
There was an allusion to the advertisements being paid for by “ a number of patriotic American citizens.
” On July 11 Senator Holt spoke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In my past article I addressed the Warburg myth being started by the Strasser brothers and Walter Stennes who attempted a coup against Hitler , as a means to separate Hitler from his base .
So we will not go over that again here .
However , we will begin debunking Bjerknes absurd claims regarding the Strasser brothers .
The first thing the lying fraud Bjerknes fails to mention about Otto and Gregor Strasser , is that they were actually far-leftists that were AGAINST Hitler and had allot to gain from spreading lies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refer to Mike Kings recent article on Veterans Today entitled “ Hate speech and Controversy Corner , Defense of Hitler ” ; This lie has been around for 100 years now – but only recently has been amplified to new levels .
What matters most is not which “ scholar ” or “ credible ” right-wing author has repeated it ; but rather , who started it .
The third-party “ hearsay ” originator of this classic “ projection ” smear was a supposedly “ right-wing ” English writer named Douglas Reed — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Nemesis : The Story of Otto Strasser ” — claims to have heard this from his hero — Otto Strasser himself .
Strasser was an early member of NSDAP ( so-called “ Nazis ” ) who , along with his brother Gregor Strasser , led a radical hard-left / anti-business faction of the Party which rivaled that of the pro-business , conservative Hitler faction .
Like the Bolsheviks of Russia , the radical leftist Strasser Brothers sought the nationalization of the German industry .
According to the Communist website , Spartacus Educational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) joined forces with his brother , Gregor Strasser , to establish the Berliner Arbeiter Zeitung , a left-wing newspaper , that advocated world revolution .
It also supported Lenin and the Bolshevik government in the Soviet Union.
” They were ultimately expelled from the NSDAP in 1930 .
During his exile from Germany , the traitor Otto Strasser showed his true colors by taking refuge in Czechoslovakia of the Communist Edward Benes , and later , France .
He agitated relentlessly against Germany during both peacetime and wartime – spewing filth at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( before 1938 ) , as well as a number of British , American and Canadian newspapers .
After the war , communist East Germany even invited Otto Strasser to come to live there !
When he died in 1974 , the New York Times obituary ( which was actually respectful ! )
compared his anti-business radicalism to that of Leon Trotsky !
This then is the type of human scum which Mr. Bjerknes and others must blindly rely upon — ( and through a third party , no less ! )
to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bolshevik.
” 1 .
The Strasser Brothers were essentially anti-business Leftists who wanted to head the NSDAP .
The logo of their traitorous faction actually resembles the Soviet Hammer & Sickle .
2 & 3 .
Slanderous projection and garbage hearsay !
Anti-Hitler English hack Douglas Reed told us that Leftist Otto Strasser once told him said that Hitler ( his rival ) belonged to a military unit headed by Bolsheviks after the first World War.
” The lying fraud Bjerknes claims that the Strasser brothers were “ exposing ” Hitler as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s why Hitler purged them in the night of the long knives , but the truth is actually the exact opposite !
the Strasser brothers themselves were the communists !
This is how the lying fraud Bjerknes twists the truth .
Furthermore , if Hitler really was a “ secret communist ” as Bjerknes claims , then he should have been getting along with the far left Strasser brothers just fine !
But instead , they were purged after a coup attempt against Hitler .
Again , referencing Mike Kings great piece refuting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in regards to the night of the long knives : “ When the NSDAP – via popular vote — finally came to power in 1933 , the militarily powerful and treasonous Strasser – Rohm faction plotted the violent overthrow of Hitler – a coup attempt which surely would have plunged a still very unstable Germany into a horrible and protracted civil war .
Under the proactive leadership of Hitler , Herman Goring , and Heinrich Himmler , the conspiracy was thwarted in 1934 by Operation Hummingbird ( hyped-up as the so-called “ Night @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fake News of Britain ) .
Gregor Strasser and Ernst Roehm — the homosexual leftist leader of the powerful paramilitary SA “ Storm Troopers / Brown Shirts ” — were executed .
Given the sympathetic coverage for the executed traitors of Germany in the British press , it seems more likely that Strasser and Roehm — were the British agents , not Hitler !
1 .
The evil Roehm / Strasser Leftist wing of the NSDAP plotted to overthrow the elected and popular government of Hitler , and plunge Germany into Civil War @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under their control to do it .
2 .
An honest headline in a western newspaper calls the event , properly a “ Storm Troop Coup Broken by Hitler.
” The lying fraud Bjerknes then goes on to claim that National Socialism was essentially the same as Marxist socialism and therefore indistinguishable from communism , or rather , the two are just derivatives of each other .
This is pure libertarian , Murray Rothbard tier-nonsense that caters to individuals with a very limited understanding of economics and socioeconomic philosophies .
First we will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Socialism and Marxian Socialism and then review NSDAP quotes on the subject to show how these ideologies are not at all similar , and Bjerknes is lying yet again .
Translated 2010 by Hadding Scott from the 16th ( 1940 ) edition of Politische Fibel by Hansjoerg Maennel.
” “ Purely economic thought rends the folk into many interest-groups ; purely political thought unites the nation .
National-Socialism therefore demands the precedence of politics over economics .
The economy should serve folk and state , not the reverse .
Only National-Socialism stands for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were the mortal enemies of every true socialism .
Marxism and socialism are not , as lying reactionaries claimed , the same thing .
Marxism is a betrayal of socialism .
The Jew Karl Marx , in the service of Jewry , falsified socialism ( cf .
chapter 11 ) .
National-Socialism likewise opposes the social-welfare rhetoric ( soziale Phrase ) of the liberal bourgeoisie .
“ Social ” ( in this sense ) is the attempt , motivated by pity or fear , to solve the Labor Question through alms .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the folk community by means of gifts , welfare-services , and charity .
This integration can not happen through a favor from above but only through a justified demand from below .
We are not “ social , ” but Socialists !
Welfare-services alone are not enough .
The prerequisite for the solution of the Labor Question is a change of opinion in the whole people .
The German Winter Aid Program ( Winterhilfswerk ) is not a handout for the needy ; rather it is a mighty sacrifice by the entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who are also for the most part Germany ’ s most loyal servants.
” Here we see National Socialism distinguishes itself from Marxism and communism by not embracing wealth redistribution nor keeping a dependent class of welfare recipients on a collectivized “ farm ” .
Furthermore , private property was NOT eliminated under National Socialism as it was under communism .
To say that National Socialism is just another form of communism , is laughably absurd .
Adolf Hitler : “ The German national intellects secretly whispered to each other again and again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only a variety of Marxism , perhaps even merely disguised Marxists or [ international ] Socialists .
For to this day these heads have not grasped the difference between socialism and Marxism.
” During the debate Bjerknes claimed the reason the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact happened was because Germany was “ collaborating ” with the Soviet Union to destroy Poland , because both sides ( including Germany ) are communists spreading communism .
No , Bjerknes you lying fraud , the actual truth is much different .
The temporary non-aggression pact with the Soviet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to stall a triple alliance from being formed against Germany .
It was openly being discussed in the media of the time .
The New York Times itself ran articles promoting the idea that the Soviet Union will be expected to “ join the fight ” against Germany after Britain does first .
Not to mention top globalist think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations giving positive reviews to Emil Ludwigs book “ A New Holy Alliance ” where he calls for a triple alliance against Germany to “ defeat fascism ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” which is just the mouthpiece of the Council on Foreign Relations wrote in April 1939 : “ The new alliance against Fascism , proposed by the famous biographer , is to include Britain , France and the United States , though other countries , like Russia , might join .
There is a chapter analyzing the German temperament and the German state , and one comparing Hitler and Mussolini , to the latter ’ s advantage.
” Do you really think Hitler was not aware of the plans to recreate the triple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bjerknes is why didn ’ t the West declare war on the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland like they declared war on Hitler ?
Seeing as how Britain and France had a mutual defense treaty to “ defend the sovereignty of Poland ” then the alliance should also have been activated against the USSR ?
This also ties into a point we will come back to later , where Bjerknes tries to peddle the old myth that Hitler was also a Rothschild British agent .
Which is interesting because in all the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who spread that myth , they can never explain why Britain continuously attacked Germany if he was allegedly their “ agent ” .
But I digress , we will come back to that at a later point .
The next issue we will cover is Hitler ’ s invasion of the Soviet Union .
The lying fraud Bjerknes claims the following ; The Soviet Union had NO plans to invade Europe and Hitler launched an insane attack against the Soviet Union for no reason other than to lose the war on purpose so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ communism into Europe ” and apparently Stalin knew this was going to happen and allowed it .
Ridiculous , right ?
We will refer to Viktor Suvorovs book ; “ The Chief Culprit ” but first , a quick glimpse at who Suvorov actually was ; “ From 1965 to 1968 , Suvorov finished the Frunze Kiev Red Banner Higher Military Command School .
In 1968 , he served in the 145th Motorized Rifles Regiment of the Carpathian Military District in Ukraine , participating in the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Volga Military District Headquarters , and later with the 808th Independent Army Reconnaissance Company ( Spetsnaz ) .
After attending the Military Diplomatic Academy from 1971 to 1974 , Suvorov joined the Soviet mission to the United Nations Office at Geneva , working undercover for the Soviet military intelligence service ( Glavnoye Razvedyvatel ’ noye Upravleniye ; GRU ) and achieving a rank of Captain.
” In his book , Suvorov claims that Stalin had extensive plans and buildup in place for an invasion of Europe .
Unlike the lying fraud Bjerknes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military Intelligence , had access to archival material and has far more credentials and knowledge in which to draw from .
His book was published by the Naval Institute Press .
Dennis Wise during his debate against the liar Bjerknes tried to mention this , but Bjerknes simply stated it was false ( with no evidence ) .
A few excerpts from Suvorovs book ; “ In the years 1937-1941 , the Soviet Army grew five-fold , from 1.1 million to 5.5 million… This huge increase in the size of the Soviet Army @ @ @ @ @ @ @ universal military draft in the Soviet Union on September 1 , 1939… Stalin knew when he established the draft that in two years , in the summer of 1941 , the Soviet Union must enter into a major war .
…less than one percent of the Soviet Union ’ s officers died in Stalin ’ s purge .
Soviet military commanders in 1941 were well-qualified to lead Stalin ’ s war of aggression against Europe .
“ Stalin ’ s plans for offensive war are also confirmed through his son .
During the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ June 1941 , Yakov Iosifovich Dzhugashvili , the son of Stalin , was taken prisoner by the Germans .
Stalin ’ s son was searched and questioned .
A letter from another officer dated June 11 , 1941 was found in his pockets stating : “ I am at the training camps .
I would like to be home by fall , but the planned walk to Berlin might hinder this.
” German intelligence officers asked Dzhugashvili to clarify the statement about the “ planned walk to Berlin.
” Stalin ’ s son @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Damn it !
” Obviously , the letter indicates that Soviet forces were planning to invade Germany later that year .
The evidence for Stalins planned attack on Europe is extensive , but Bjerknes must lie and deny this in order to paint his absurd picture that Hitler was a “ communist agent ” who invaded the USSR for no other reason than to “ lose the war on purpose to spread communism ” .
It is so absurd , historically incorrect and ignorant it is actually downright embarrassing Bjerknes would even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to continue with this ridiculous narrative maybe he should contact Viktor Suvorov himself and show Suvorov all the evidence he has ( of which Bjerknes has none ) to prove the Soviet Union was not about to invade Europe and that ex-Soviet military intelligence Suvorov is wrong , what a laugh that would be !
We will examine John Wear , author of “ Germany ’ s War ” and his assessment of the Soviet buildup ; “ Stalin ’ s more than 200 submarines and the rest of his navy were ineffective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was an attack fleet .
Stalin ’ s navy was built for aggressive war and could not be used effectively in a defensive war .
Entirely different ships with entirely different characteristics are needed for defense : submarine hunters , picket boats , minesweepers , and net-layers .
The armament of the Soviet ships was also designed exclusively for participation in a war of aggression .
While armed with powerful artillery , mine , and torpedo equipment , Soviet ships had quite weak anti-aircraft armament and defenses.
” “ Soviet generals had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crushing surprise attack against the enemy ’ s air bases that annihilated his aviation .
When Germany attacked first , the Soviet navy ’ s lack of anti-aircraft defenses was a major liability .
The Soviet war effort was also hurt by the fact that all of the navy ’ s reserves of shells , mines , torpedoes , and ship fuel had been transported to the German borders and were quickly seized by the Germans when they invaded the Soviet Union.
” John Wear then goes on to recount Suvorov ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Suvorov had been taught to notice strange occurrences , anomalies , and exceptions to the rules .
Suvorov noticed that no matter what happened in the Soviet Union , the government and media always tried to conceal the negative aspects and show the positive .
You could not find any negative news about the Soviet Union .
Everything was always fine , culture was flourishing , the quality of life was getting better and better , the Soviet Union would soon surpass the United States .
A magnitude 7.3 on the Richter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ashkhabad was not reported ; those who spoke about the earthquake were arrested and put into prison for spreading false rumors .
Even catastrophes such as the Chernobyl disaster were not reported .
After an international investigation exposed the Chernobyl disaster , the Soviets claimed that the Chernobyl accident was completely insignificant and no one should pay any attention to it .
Suvorov noticed one exception to these rules : June 22 , 1941 , the day Germany attacked the Soviet Union .
All Soviet sources talk about the blatant unpreparedness of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sources said that the Soviet Army had no good commanders , that Soviet tanks and airplanes were outdated , that the Soviet Union was totally unprepared for war , and that Stalin was stupid to have trusted Hitler .
Suvorov was taught by his intelligence training to look for incoherence .
He asked : Why was it that the Soviets , who would HIDE all other mistakes , accidents , and catastrophes , make such a tremendous effort to emphasize the mistakes of the Soviet Union in June 1941 ?
Suvorov soon realized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gone out of their way to hide any details that would enable an outsider to construct the reality of what was happening in the Soviet Union at the beginning of the German invasion .
Suvorov found a way to construct this reality .
While a student at the Academy , Suvorov wrote an independent research paper titled “ The Attack of Germany on the Soviet Union on June 22 , 1941.
” Suvorov explained his interest in the subject by saying to his professors that he wanted to study how Germany prepared for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this kind would never happen again .
The topic of Suvorov ’ s research was approved and he was given access to closed archives .
Suvorov was extra careful not to reveal the real interest of his research .
Suvorov discovered that the Soviet version of World War II history is a lie and that it conceals the Soviet Union ’ s responsibility for planning the start of the war .
The Red Army in June 1941 was the largest , best equipped army in the history of the world .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ border was frightful .
If Hitler had not invaded the Soviet Union on June 22 , 1941 , the Soviet Union would have easily taken over all of Europe .
German intelligence correctly saw the massive concentration of Soviet forces on the German border , but it did not see all of the Soviet military preparedness .
The real picture was much graver than Germany realized.
” Bjerknes claims Stalin knew about Hitlers impending invasion of the Soviet Union , Suvorov and John Wear remarks on this matter ; “ Suvorov has often @ @ @ @ @ @ @ separate independent espionage agencies working for him .
The total power of these agencies was colossal , and testimonies abound about the might of Stalin ’ s espionage .
These Soviet espionage services had penetrated into leading German military and political circles .
Soviet military intelligence managed to gain access in Germany to the most secret information from the highest levels of power .
Given these facts , the question is : Suvorov says that Hitler knew that it had become impossible to conceal his preparations to invade the Soviet Union .
Therefore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a way that Stalin could hear , “ “ Yes , I want to attack Stalin after I have finished the war in the west.
” The Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Soviet Armed Forces ( GRU ) also made extensive studies of all the economic , political , and military aspects of the situation and concluded that Germany could not win a war on two fronts .
The GRU concluded that Hitler would not begin a war in the east without first finishing the war in the west @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a detailed report to Stalin on March 20 , 1941 , which concluded that “ the earliest possible date on which operations against the USSR may begin is the moment following victory over England or after an honorable peace for Germany has been achieved.
” “ Yet on the eve of the German invasion , Soviet intelligence reported that preparations for invasion had not yet begun , and without these preparations it was impossible for Germany to begin the war .
Soviet intelligence believed , with good reason , that a country needed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One of the vital things Germany would need to fight the Soviet Union was sheepskin coats so that its troops could survive the Russian winter .
All GRU agents in Europe gathered and analyzed information on sheep in Europe , and on the main sheep-breeding centers and slaughterhouses .
As soon as Hitler decided to attack the Soviet Union , Soviet intelligence thought that Germany would order industry to begin producing millions of sheepskin coats .
This would be reflected in rising sheepskin prices , and sheepskin coats would be delivered to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were never delivered to any divisions of the German army .
Soviet intelligence also reasoned that the German army would have to use a new type of lubricating oil for its weaponry and motor fuel for its vehicles for the extremely cold Russian winters .
The lubricating oil Germany usually used would congeal in the frost , component parts would freeze together , and the weapons would not work .
The normal German motor fuel broke down into incombustible components in heavy frost .
The quantities and type of liquid fuels possessed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offensive operations in the Soviet Union .
Germany was not even conducting research in the field of creating frost-resistant fuels and oils .
The GRU closely followed many other indicators for warning signals of a German invasion .
German soldiers needed boots , warm underwear , sweaters , special tents , hats , heaters , skis , ski wax , masking robes , devices for heating water , and frost-resistant batteries .
The German army also needed tanks with broad caterpillar tracks , thousands of cars that could drive in poor road conditions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ army had none of these .
Outside of a great buildup of German troops on the Soviet border , Germany had made no preparations for war against the Soviet Union .
Since the German army had not taken reasonable actions to prepare for war , Stalin and his agents did not believe that Germany would invade the Soviet Union.
” This is a bit of an irony , as the lying fraud Bjerknes tried to claim Hitler intentionally didn ’ t give his soldiers winter equipment to “ lose the war on purpose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was because he simply had no time to do so , and was aware Soviet moles would pick up on the preparations .
This is clearly reflected in the fact that Stalins divisions were utterly unprepared and caught with their pants down when the German invasion began .
“ John Wear ; “ Germany ’ s War – The origins Aftermath and Atrocities of WW II ” Now that we have done a little bit of clarifying that the impending Soviet invasion was legitimate , we will move onto the next claim by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he stated that Hitler issued “ halt orders ” in Smolensk and divided his troops , thus implying an intentional delayed advance on Moscow because Hitler wanted to wait for the Soviets to regroup so he could “ lose the war on purpose.
” Bjerknes is playing armchair general here , a little bit of historical context is necessary .
Soviet Marshal Semyon K. Timoshenko was dispatched to Smolensk with 5 armies to block the German advance because Smolensk was seen as the final land bridge to Moscow .
Hitler was concerned that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surrounded Red Army forces close to the border in the Byelostok and Minsk pockets would be able escape , Hitler ordered the two generals Hoth and Guderian to slow their advance so the following German infantry which was over 60 miles behind the mechanized units could catch up and create a buffer zone to contain the surrounded Soviet troops .
Furthermore , the German supply lines were becoming seriously over stretched .
In essence , had the panzer units charged through Smolensk , they would have done so without infantry support for some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as general Guderian himself wrote .
This was the reason for the initial delay .
By July 10th , the 29th Motorized Division broke into Smolensk and began fighting the Soviet defenders inside the city .
General Heinz Guderians panzer corp moved East on to Yartsevo .
By July 16th the German 29th Motorized Division had fully captured Smolensk .
Interestingly enough , this is where Stalins son , Lieutenant Yakov Dzhugashvili was captured by German forces .
Bjerknes claimed Hitler ordered his divisions to “ halt ” at Smolensk and divert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” the advance to Moscow , but in fact what ACTUALLY happened was after CAPTURING Smolensk , Heinz Guderians 2nd panzer division moved directly East towards Yartsevo and proceeded to capture Yartsevo which is literally the next town on the road to Moscow !
.
What the hell is Bjerknes talking about ?
?
It was past Yartsevo that Army Group South made contact with the Soviet Fifth Army and problems began .
Bjerknes was a little confused and cant remember his facts right , thats okay , we will help him out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from an unexpected quarter when Hitler became concerned with the overall progress of the campaign .
The success of Army Group Center was not matched by Army Groups North and South , which were beginning to fall behind schedule in the face of determined Soviet resistance .
Especially bothersome for the Germans was the Soviet Fifth Army under Maj. Gen. Mikhail I. Potapov of the Southwestern Front .
This army established itself at the easternmost edges of the extensive wooded and swampy area known as the Pripyat Marshes .
Its location and active @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Army Group Center and the left flank of Army Group South .
To stabilize the situation on the far-flung wings of the invasion , Hitler effectively ordered Army Group Center to go on the defensive on July 31 , while turning Hoth ’ s panzer group north and Guderian ’ s south .
But first the German high command called for a two-week halt in order to refit and reinforce its frontline formations , particularly panzer and motorized divisions .
Without their panzer support , the infantry of Army Group Center conducted mainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with very minor panzer participation , the German Ninth Field Army successfully trapped and largely destroyed the Soviet Twenty-First Army in the area of Gomel and the Twenty-Eighth Army in the area of Roslavl in early August.
” Bjerknes claims this was Hitlers “ intentional sabotage ” of the war to avoid taking Moscow and allow the Soviets time to regroup , but what was actually happening was Army Group Center was getting ahead of Army groups North and South because of stiffened Soviet resistance on their flanks , Particularly the Soviet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , swampy terrain causing Army Group South delays which would have resulted in Army Group Center getting so far ahead that it would have created a POCKET that would have been easy for the Soviets to cut off and ENCIRCLE had they continued marching towards Moscow .
This is basic warfare strategy , progressively moving the unified front forwards without creating bulges and pockets .
Hoth and Guderians orders to “ split forces ” north and south was in actuality , an attempt to avoid getting caught in a pocket !
.
Bjerknes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a total buffoon .
Hitlers halt orders were to do the following ; 1 ) Stop Army Group Center from being overstretched , isolated , cut off and encircled .
If Hitler had gone with the Bjerknes ’ idiotic war strategy of sending Army Group Center full steam ahead towards Moscow while Army groups North and South were delayed in stiff Soviet resistance , then Army Group Center would have been easily outflanked , encircled , cut off from supplies and utterly destroyed causing the eastern front to collapse long before winter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it really would have looked like Hitler was trying to lose the war on purpose .
Folks , I am certainly no military historian , this is all a result of having just passively read these historical events .
The lying fraud Bjerknes basically counts on his victims not investigating any of this .
The final point we will come to on this topic , is in response to the lying fraud Bjerknes statement that Hitler “ slaughtered Slavs ” because he was a communist helping spread communism apparently .
Most of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s really what the guy said during the debate .
In my prior article I touched upon this and apparently need to reference it again .
First we will examine the ‘ Prague Manifesto ’ that is a joint German-Russian agreement as to what Russia was to look like after the overthrow and defeat of the communists .
Take a look at it , and tell me does this look like a communist plan cooked up by the communist Hitler trying to spread communism ?
“ As the basis for a new government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ places the following major principles : 1 ) The equality of all peoples of Russia and a real right for national development , self determination , self rule , and governmental independence .
2 ) The confirmation of a popular worker front , before which the interests of the government are subordinate to the goals of raising the well-being and development of the nation .
3 ) The preservation of peace and the establishment of peaceful relations with all nations of the world , an all round development of international collaboration .
4 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strengthening of the family and marriage .
A true equality for women .
5 ) The liquidation of forced labor and the granting to the laborers a real right to free labor which creates their material well-being , the confirmation of a wage for all types of labor in an amount that can support an appropriate standard of living .
6 ) The liquidation of collective farms , the free return of land to the private ownership of farmers .
The freedom to determine labor land usage .
The freedom to use the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the abolishment of forced requisitions , and the cancellation of all debts to the Soviet government .
7 ) The establishment of protected private labor ownership .
The reestablishment of trade , crafts , domestic industry , the granting of the right of private initiative and an opportunity for it to participate in the economic life of the nation .
8 ) Granting the intelligencia the opportunity to freely create for the well-being of their people .
9 ) Granting social justice and defense of laborers from any exploitation , regardless of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) The creation for all without exception the real right for free education , medical care , vacation , and senior welfare .
11 ) The destruction of the regime of terror and force .
Liquidation of forceful repopulations and mass exiles .
The establishment of a true freedom of religion , conscience , speech , assembly , press .
A guarantee of the protection of person , property , and home .
The equality of all before the law , the independence and clarity of the court .
12 ) The liberation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ return to the motherland from the jails and camps of all who were repressed for their battle against Bolshevism .
No revenge and persecution for those who stop their battle for Stalin and Bolshevism , regardless of whether this was done by necessity or by conviction .
13 ) The reestablishment of national property ruined during the war – cities , villages , factories , and plants at cost to the government .
14 ) Government support of invalids of the war and their families .
The destruction of Bolshevism is the uncompromised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia is certain that the united efforts of the peoples of Russia will find support amidst all free loving peoples of the world .
The Liberation Movement of the Peoples of Russia is a continuation of a many years long battle against Bolshevism , for freedom , peace , and fairness .
The successful completion of this battle is now provided for by : a ) The accumulation of greater experience than during that of the revolution of 1917. b ) The accumulation of growing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Liberation Army , the Ukrainian Liberation Forces , Cossack forces and national detachments c ) The accumulation of anti-Bolshevik armed forces in the Soviet rear .
d ) The accumulation of growing oppositional powers within the people , government apparatus , and army of the USSR.
” Why would Hitler even bother having this created if he hated Slavs and wanted to lose the war on purpose ?
Actually , here ’ s an even better question , why did Hitler allow 800,000 anti-communist Slavic Russians to join the Russian Liberation Army ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ reflect the actions of a man who ’ s trying to lose the war on purpose ?
You see , Bjerknes as usual has to leave out the fine details of history to reach his absurd conclusions .
A good video breaking down the magnitude of the Russian Liberation Army below with historical footage and speeches from the joint Russian-German communist liberation forces themselves ; We will conclude here , in the third installment we will address Bjerknes claims about why Hitler declared war on the United States , the Dunkirk incident , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other topics .
Stay tuned !
– Wears War “ Stalin ’ s Preparations For An Offensive War In The Summer of 1941 To Make Europe A Soviet-Communist Continent ” -Warfare History Network , “ Barbarossa and holding the line and Smolensk ”

This article will serve as a follow up piece to my first article debunking the lies of the huckster, Christopher Bjerknes. However, this article will focus mainly on the debate the lying fraud Bjerknes had with Dennis Wise on Adam Greens show. If any of you have not listened to that disaster of a debate, it might behoove you to do so just to get a glimpse of the arrogance and lies of Bjerknes, but be warned, it’s very hard to listen to. I will give Adam Green due credit for actually hosting this debate and I sincerely hope to clear up some points that were missed, It was an opportunity for productive discussion but it seemed to have devolved into a disorganized mess. Mainly because Bjerknes is an arrogant and petulant child that continued to yell, insult and hang up. What was lost in translation can be clarified here. This will be a rather lengthy article, and spans many diverse topics but should be interesting to those of you who are aware of Bjerknes lies. A third installment after this one will be needed to continue covering the material from the debate.
In this article, we will journey down a list of bogus claims and distortions made by Bjerknes during his debate and astutely fact-check him so that we can all clearly see, Christopher Jon Bjerknes is an absolute liar, conman and huckster.
The first claim that Bjerknes the liar brought up was one Hjalmar Schact, the president of the Reichsbank, who he claimed was a Freemason working for the Zionist bankers. This was allegedly, according to Bjerknes, part of the Zionist cabal “controlling Hitlers Germany”. What was NOT mentioned by the fraud Bjerknes, is what actually became of Hjalmar Schacht. Not only was he DISMISSED from the Reichsbank by Adolf Hitler in 1939 and replaced by Walther Funk (who then began implemented Gottfried Feders economic theory, something the Rothschild agent Schacht vehemently vetoed) He was soon after ARRESTED and placed in a German concentration camp!. Lets examine this further, and you will instantly understand why the lying fraud Bjerknes made sure to leave this part out.
“In 1939 Schacht was replaced by Dr. Walther Funk, who had served in 1932 as deputy chairman of the NSDAP’s economic council under the chairmanship of Feder. The replacement of Schacht by Funk working under the direction of Göring the head of the Four Year Plan, seems to be an indication that a transitional phase had been completed and that the Government was well aware of Schacht’s role as an agent for international capital. Otto D. Tolischus, writing from Berlin for The New York Times, commented:
“Dr. Schacht was ousted because he believed that Germany had reached the limit in debt-making and currency-expansion, that any further expansion spelled danger to the economic system, for which he still considered himself responsible, and that the government would have to curtail its ambitions and confine itself to the nation’s means…
No authoritative explanation of the new financial policy is available so far, but judging from hints in the highest quarters, the policy is likely to proceed about as follows:
Expand the currency circulation only for current exchange demands and not for special purposes.
Open the capital market for private industry and make private industry finance many tasks hitherto financed by the state, either directly or by prices on public orders, which have enabled industry to finance the expansion of new Four-Year Plan factories out of accumulated profits and reserves.
Create a non-interest bearing credit instrument with which the state, now having to share the capital market with private enterprise, will finance its own further orders in anticipation of increasing tax receipts from the resulting expansion of production.
In one respect therefore, Herr Funk presumably will continue ‘pre-financing’ the state’s orders as did Dr. Schacht, but whereas Dr. Schacht did it with bills, loans, delivery certificates and other credit instruments, all of which cost between 4½ and 5 per cent interest per year, Herr Funk proposes doing it with non-interest-eating instruments.
How that is to be done is his secret, but the mere mention of interest-free credit instruments inevitably recalls the plan of Gottfried Feder which at one time fascinated Chancellor Hitler, but which Dr Schacht vetoed.”
As we see clearly, Bjerknes the lying fraud avoids mentioning the sacking of Schacht and his replacement with a true National Socialist economic theoretician to begin implementing non-interest bearing currency. Bjerknes does not mention this because it does not fit his bogus narrative of “Schacht was a Zionist banker controlling Hitler”.
Soon after this, Hjalmar Schacht was involved in trying to help ASSASSINATE Hitler, and was soon arrested and imprisoned!
“After the attempt on Hitler’s life on 20 July 1944, Schacht was arrested on 23 July. He was sent to Ravensbrück, then to Flossenbürg, and finally to Dachau. In late April 1945 he and about 140 other prominent inmates of Dachau were transferred to Tyrol by the SS, which left them there. They were liberated by the Fifth U.S. Army on 5 May 1945 in Niederdorf, South Tyrol, Dolomites, Italy”
But wait, it gets even better:
“Schacht was said to be in contact with the German resistance as early as 1934, though at that time he still believed the Nazi regime would follow his policies. By 1938, he was disillusioned, and was an active participant in the plans for a coup d’état against Hitler if he started a war against Czechoslovakia. Goerdeler, his colleague in 1935–36, was the civilian leader of resistance to Hitler. Schacht talked frequently with Hans Gisevius, another resistance figure; when resistance organizer Theodor Strünck’s house (a frequent meeting place) was bombed out, Schacht allowed Strünck and his wife to live in a villa he owned.”
So wait a minute, Bjerknes, why would Hjalmar Schacht be conspiring with the German resistance so early (1934) to overthrow Hitler if Hitler was allegedly a puppet? Explanation please!
Furthermore, we will examine Hjalmar Schachts own book “The Magic of Money” to understand what his true motives really were!
“Schacht, with his connections in England and the United States, was bent on hindering Germany’s rearmament because he was disloyal. He admitted this in his book, The Magic of Money (1967).
An American diplomat, Donald R. Heath, wrote to Schacht in 1959 to inform him of how he had vouched for his collaboration with the U.S. government during the war:
“I told [American prosecutor Robert] Jackson not only should you never have been brought before that tribunal but that you had consistently been working for the downfall of the Nazi regime. I told him that I had been in touch with you consistently during the first part of the war and Under Secretary of State Wells through me, and that you had passed on to me information adverse to the Nazi cause…. [D. Heath quoted by H. Schacht, The Magic of Money (1967), p. 107]”
Clearly we see Hjalmar Schacht was acting as a covert saboteur on behalf of international finance, NOT Hitlers handler! Perhaps the lying fraud Bjerknes would like to clarify why Hjalmar Schact was removed from the Reichsbank and replaced by a student of Feder, if Hitlers economic recovery was guided by Masonic bankers? Or perhaps the lying fraud Bjerknes can attempt to answer why Schacht was conspiring with the German resistance to overthrow Hitler if Schacht was allegedly Hitlers controller? Please address this in your next interview, you shameless lying fraud, because inquiring minds want to know!
As an addition we will examine how after Hjalmar Schact was gone, Walther Funk began implementing a true anti-globalist finance economic plan.
“Broadly, it seems that Feder’s ideas were being implemented. The NSDAP broke the bondage of the international gold merchants. Germany created an autarchic trading bloc both before and during the war, based on barter through a Reich clearing center. Pegging national currencies to the Reichsmark resulted in immediate wage increases in the occupied states.”
The Bank for International Settlements Annual Report for 1940-1941 quoted finance spokesmen from Fascist Italy and the Third Reich:
“The development of clearings in Europe has given rise to certain fears with regard to the future position of gold as an element in the monetary structure. It has since been noted that Germany has been able to finance rearmament and war with very slight gold reserves and that the foreign trade of Germany and Italy has been carried on largely on a clearing basis. Hence the question is being asked whether a new monetary system is being developed which will altogether dispense with the services of gold.
In authoritative statements made on this subject in Germany and Italy a distinction is drawn between different functions of gold. The president of the German Reichsbank said in a speech on 26 July 1940 that “in any case in the future gold will play no role as a basis of European currencies, for a currency is not dependent upon its cover but on the value which is given to it by the state, i.e. by the economic order as regulated by the state.” “It is,” he added, “another matter whether gold should be regarded as a suitable medium for the settlement of debit balances between countries, but we shall never pursue a monetary policy which makes us in any way dependent upon gold, for it is impossible to tie oneself to a medium the value of which one cannot determine oneself.”
This is an important aspect that Bjerknes the lying fraud addresses nowhere, the fact that Hitler implemented an interest free currency system to bypass the international gold standard, particularly under Walther Funk. Bjerknes the lying fraud must avoid this pertinent issue because it flatly debunks his narrative as “Hitler a communist working for the bankers”. For a further more in-depth breakdown of Hitlers economic system, the book “Hitlers Revolution” by Richard Tedor is a must read.
(Former White House Chief of Staff and United States Secretary of the Treasury, James Baker in 1992, German magazine Der Spiegel.)
Moving onto the second lie spouted by the fraud Bjerknes during the interview was in reference to yet again the usual “Zionist bankers funding Hitler” claim. In particular Bjerknes mentions two banks. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and J.H. Stein. For this we will refer back to James Poole’s book “Who Financed Hitler” for reference. The truth is much different than what the lying fraud Bjerknes claims.\
Montague Norman who was not Jewish, was the governor of the Bank of England for 24 years, was anti-France, disliked Jews immensely, was opposed to Versailles, and favored Germany due to his earlier studies there lent money to the NSDAP after 1933. However, the accusation that money was funneled from Baron Kurt von Schröder and J. H. Stein and Company in 1932, is NOT proven. Schröder was a German partner in J. H. Stein.
A gentile Englishmen, who was anti-communist lent money, but no evidence exists to support the Kurt von Schröder and J.H. Stein theory. However Anthony Sutton who DOES support the Kurt von Schroder theory in his book “Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler” says the following;
“Schröder had organized the banking firm of J. Henry Schröder in London and J. Henry Schröder Banking Corporation in New York… in order to act as conduit for I.T.T. money funnelled to Heinrich Himmler’s SS organization in 1944, while World War II was in progress and the United States was at war with Germany.”
First problem with that claim, Bjerknes says J.H. Stein financed Hitlers early rise to power, not late war financing so the dates are confused. Second problem, by 1944 Germany had already long since switched out its currency methods and no longer utilized gold as an exchange medium, so essentially any money “transferred” to Germany would have been absolutely useless paper not compatible to the German bank. Third problem, the entire weight of Suttons book “Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler” relies heavily and shoddy second-hand sources, particularly the Fritz Thyssen memoirs and “Hitlers Secret Backers”. We will review the shoddiness of these sources as reviewed by Yale scholar Henry Ashby Turner, but first a little introduction to Mr. Turner:
“Turner, who spent 1954–1955 as a Fulbright scholar at the University of Munich and the University of Berlin, knew German and exhaustively examined original, unpublished records of large German corporations, trade associations, and the Nazi Party. (Some of his scholarly work was written and published in German.)
Unsurprisingly for anyone who has read David Irving, Turner notes that the documentary sources he consulted had been ignored by other historians. Mostly Turner cites original documents: “Only in the case of impeccable scholarly editions have I relied on published versions of materials I originally used in archival form” (p. xv).”
Mr. Turner goes on to review Suttons sources;
Although Fritz Thyssen was a rare big business supporter of Hitler, Turner was aware that his book I Paid Hitler (1941) is unreliable. He calls it “purported memoirs” “ghostwritten” by the “Hungarian” Emery Reves. (He does not reveal that Reves was actually a well-connected Jewish propagandist.) Turner wrote a German paper on the subject, “Fritz Thyssen und ‘I Paid Hitler’,” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 19 (1971).
“Antony C. Sutton’s “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler” relies heavily not only on the bogus memoirs attributed to Thyssen, but other fraudulent “authorities” such as Jewish journalist Ladislas Farago. His untenable thesis is the same as Leftists’ and Jews’: “The contribution made by American capitalism to German war preparations before 1940 can only be described as phenomenal”—“certainly crucial to German military capabilities.”
The final summation of Bjerknes lies and distortions; an anti-communist English Gentile, Montague Norman donated money but their is zero evidence to support the J.H. Stein theory, and those academics who do push this theory have based their “research” on either ghost written anonymous authors or actual Jewish newspaper propagandists. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was Jacob Schiffs bank, the lying fraud Bjerknes knows very well the “Schiff financed Hitler” myth is baseless and long since debunked, so perhaps if Bjerknes uses the bank name “Kuhn, Loeb & Co.” he might be able to confuse and throw people off who were not familiar with the actual name of Jacob Schiffs banking firm. But just for some laughs, to throw it in Bjerknes face, the reality was that Schiff and his Kuhn, Loeb & Co. were at the forefront for agitating for war against Hitler in a campaign literally entitled: “Stop Hitler Now!”
“Senator Rush D. Holt, a liberal pacifist, during the last session of the 76th Congress, exposed the oligarchs promoting belligerence against Germany. Commenting on an influential committee, Defend America by Aiding the Allies, headed by newspaperman William Allen White, to agitate for war against Germany, or at least “all aid short of war” to Britain, Senator Holt said the founders included “eighteen prominent bankers.” Among those present at its April 1940 founding were Henry L. Stimson, who had served as counsel for J. P. Morgan and senior Morgan partner Thomas W. Lamont. The campaign began on June 10, 1940, with advertisements entitled “Stop Hitler Now” appearing in newspapers throughout the USA. There was an allusion to the advertisements being paid for by “a number of patriotic American citizens.” On July 11 Senator Holt spoke to the Senate on the advertisement:
“You find it is not the little fellows who paid for this advertisement, “Stop Hitler Now!” … Listen to these banks. The directors of these banks, or the families of directors, paid for this advertisement. Who are they? No wonder they want Hitler stopped. Director of J. Pierpont Morgan & Co.; Director of Drexel & Co.; Director of Kuhn, Loeb Co., – Senators have heard that name before – Kuhn, Loeb & Co. international banking. No wonder Kuhn, Loeb & Co. helped finance such an advertisement. A Director of Lehman Bros., another international banking firm, helped pay for this “Stop Hitler” advisement, and a number of others.” “Rabid Tory Propagandists are Worst War Profiteers,” Weekly Roll-Call, January 25, 1941, p. 6; citing Chicago Daily Tribune, June 12, 1940.
In my past article I addressed the Warburg myth being started by the Strasser brothers and Walter Stennes who attempted a coup against Hitler, as a means to separate Hitler from his base. So we will not go over that again here. However, we will begin debunking Bjerknes absurd claims regarding the Strasser brothers.
The first thing the lying fraud Bjerknes fails to mention about Otto and Gregor Strasser, is that they were actually far-leftists that were AGAINST Hitler and had allot to gain from spreading lies and myths about him. We will refer to Mike Kings recent article on Veterans Today entitled “Hate speech and Controversy Corner, Defense of Hitler”;
“Baseless Claim #1:
Hitler Served in a Bavarian Communist Military Unit After World War I
This lie has been around for 100 years now – but only recently has been amplified to new levels. What matters most is not which “scholar” or “credible” right-wing author has repeated it; but rather, who started it.
The third-party “hearsay” originator of this classic “projection” smear was a supposedly “right-wing” English writer named Douglas Reed — who, in his 1940 book, “Nemesis: The Story of Otto Strasser” — claims to have heard this from his hero — Otto Strasser himself. Strasser was an early member of NSDAP (so-called “Nazis”) who, along with his brother Gregor Strasser, led a radical hard-left / anti-business faction of the Party which rivaled that of the pro-business, conservative Hitler faction. Like the Bolsheviks of Russia, the radical leftist Strasser Brothers sought the nationalization of the German industry. According to the Communist website, Spartacus Educational:
“In 1924 he (Strasser) joined forces with his brother, Gregor Strasser, to establish the Berliner Arbeiter Zeitung, a left-wing newspaper, that advocated world revolution. It also supported Lenin and the Bolshevik government in the Soviet Union.”
They were ultimately expelled from the NSDAP in 1930. During his exile from Germany, the traitor Otto Strasser showed his true colors by taking refuge in Czechoslovakia of the Communist Edward Benes, and later, France. He agitated relentlessly against Germany during both peacetime and wartime – spewing filth at Hitler’s Germany for Czechoslovakian radio (before 1938), as well as a number of British, American and Canadian newspapers. After the war, communist East Germany even invited Otto Strasser to come to live there! When he died in 1974, the New York Times obituary (which was actually respectful!) compared his anti-business radicalism to that of Leon Trotsky!
This then is the type of human scum which Mr. Bjerknes and others must blindly rely upon — (and through a third party, no less!) to make his case for “Hitler the Bolshevik.”
1. The Strasser Brothers were essentially anti-business Leftists who wanted to head the NSDAP. The logo of their traitorous faction actually resembles the Soviet Hammer & Sickle.
2 & 3. Slanderous projection and garbage hearsay! Anti-Hitler English hack Douglas Reed told us that Leftist Otto Strasser once told him said that Hitler (his rival) belonged to a military unit headed by Bolsheviks after the first World War.”
The lying fraud Bjerknes claims that the Strasser brothers were “exposing” Hitler as a “secret communist” and that’s why Hitler purged them in the night of the long knives, but the truth is actually the exact opposite! the Strasser brothers themselves were the communists! This is how the lying fraud Bjerknes twists the truth. Furthermore, if Hitler really was a “secret communist” as Bjerknes claims, then he should have been getting along with the far left Strasser brothers just fine! But instead, they were purged after a coup attempt against Hitler.
Again, referencing Mike Kings great piece refuting Bjerknes, he has this to say in regards to the night of the long knives:
“When the NSDAP – via popular vote — finally came to power in 1933, the militarily powerful and treasonous Strasser – Rohm faction plotted the violent overthrow of Hitler – a coup attempt which surely would have plunged a still very unstable Germany into a horrible and protracted civil war. Under the proactive leadership of Hitler, Herman Goring, and Heinrich Himmler, the conspiracy was thwarted in 1934 by Operation Hummingbird (hyped-up as the so-called “Night of the Long Knives” by the Fake News of Britain).
Gregor Strasser and Ernst Roehm — the homosexual leftist leader of the powerful paramilitary SA “Storm Troopers / Brown Shirts” — were executed. Given the sympathetic coverage for the executed traitors of Germany in the British press, it seems more likely that Strasser and Roehm — were the British agents, not Hitler!
1. The evil Roehm / Strasser Leftist wing of the NSDAP plotted to overthrow the elected and popular government of Hitler, and plunge Germany into Civil War — and they had enough armed manpower under their control to do it.
2. An honest headline in a western newspaper calls the event, properly a “Storm Troop Coup Broken by Hitler.”
The lying fraud Bjerknes then goes on to claim that National Socialism was essentially the same as Marxist socialism and therefore indistinguishable from communism, or rather, the two are just derivatives of each other. This is pure libertarian, Murray Rothbard tier-nonsense that caters to individuals with a very limited understanding of economics and socioeconomic philosophies.
First we will examine the actual economic differences between National Socialism and Marxian Socialism and then review NSDAP quotes on the subject to show how these ideologies are not at all similar, and Bjerknes is lying yet again.
“Chapter 5
Liberalism or Socialism
Translated 2010 by Hadding Scott from the 16th (1940) edition of Politische Fibel by Hansjoerg Maennel.”
“Purely economic thought rends the folk into many interest-groups; purely political thought unites the nation. National-Socialism therefore demands the precedence of politics over economics. The economy should serve folk and state, not the reverse.
Only National-Socialism stands for true socialism. Marxism and bourgeois patriotism were the mortal enemies of every true socialism. Marxism and socialism are not, as lying reactionaries claimed, the same thing. Marxism is a betrayal of socialism. The Jew Karl Marx, in the service of Jewry, falsified socialism (cf. chapter 11).
National-Socialism likewise opposes the social-welfare rhetoric (soziale Phrase) of the liberal bourgeoisie.
“Social” (in this sense) is the attempt, motivated by pity or fear, to solve the Labor Question through alms. But the working class can never be integrated into the folk community by means of gifts, welfare-services, and charity. This integration cannot happen through a favor from above but only through a justified demand from below. We are not “social,” but Socialists! Welfare-services alone are not enough. The prerequisite for the solution of the Labor Question is a change of opinion in the whole people. The German Winter Aid Program (Winterhilfswerk) is not a handout for the needy; rather it is a mighty sacrifice by the entire nation for the poorest folk comrades, who are also for the most part Germany’s most loyal servants.”
Here we see National Socialism distinguishes itself from Marxism and communism by not embracing wealth redistribution nor keeping a dependent class of welfare recipients on a collectivized “farm”. Furthermore, private property was NOT eliminated under National Socialism as it was under communism. To say that National Socialism is just another form of communism, is laughably absurd.
Adolf Hitler: “The German national intellects secretly whispered to each other again and again the suspicion that we were fundamentally also only a variety of Marxism, perhaps even merely disguised Marxists or [international] Socialists. For to this day these heads have not grasped the difference between socialism and Marxism.”
During the debate Bjerknes claimed the reason the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact happened was because Germany was “collaborating” with the Soviet Union to destroy Poland, because both sides (including Germany) are communists spreading communism. No, Bjerknes you lying fraud, the actual truth is much different. The temporary non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union was an attempt by Hitler, to stall a triple alliance from being formed against Germany. It was openly being discussed in the media of the time. The New York Times itself ran articles promoting the idea that the Soviet Union will be expected to “join the fight” against Germany after Britain does first. Not to mention top globalist think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations giving positive reviews to Emil Ludwigs book “A New Holy Alliance” where he calls for a triple alliance against Germany to “defeat fascism”.
The globalist “Foreign Affairs Quarterly” which is just the mouthpiece of the Council on Foreign Relations wrote in April 1939:
“The new alliance against Fascism, proposed by the famous biographer, is to include Britain, France and the United States, though other countries, like Russia, might join. There is a chapter analyzing the German temperament and the German state, and one comparing Hitler and Mussolini, to the latter’s advantage.”
Do you really think Hitler was not aware of the plans to recreate the triple alliance again? The better question for Bjerknes is why didn’t the West declare war on the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland like they declared war on Hitler? Seeing as how Britain and France had a mutual defense treaty to “defend the sovereignty of Poland” then the alliance should also have been activated against the USSR? This also ties into a point we will come back to later, where Bjerknes tries to peddle the old myth that Hitler was also a Rothschild British agent. Which is interesting because in all the debates I’ve had with people who spread that myth, they can never explain why Britain continuously attacked Germany if he was allegedly their “agent”. But I digress, we will come back to that at a later point.
The next issue we will cover is Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union. The lying fraud Bjerknes claims the following; The Soviet Union had NO plans to invade Europe and Hitler launched an insane attack against the Soviet Union for no reason other than to lose the war on purpose so the Soviet Union could then “spread communism into Europe” and apparently Stalin knew this was going to happen and allowed it. Ridiculous, right?
We will refer to Viktor Suvorovs book; “The Chief Culprit” but first, a quick glimpse at who Suvorov actually was;
“From 1965 to 1968, Suvorov finished the Frunze Kiev Red Banner Higher Military Command School. In 1968, he served in the 145th Motorized Rifles Regiment of the Carpathian Military District in Ukraine, participating in the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia. In 1970 and 1971, he served in the Volga Military District Headquarters, and later with the 808th Independent Army Reconnaissance Company (Spetsnaz). After attending the Military Diplomatic Academy from 1971 to 1974, Suvorov joined the Soviet mission to the United Nations Office at Geneva, working undercover for the Soviet military intelligence service (Glavnoye Razvedyvatel’noye Upravleniye; GRU) and achieving a rank of Captain.”
In his book, Suvorov claims that Stalin had extensive plans and buildup in place for an invasion of Europe. Unlike the lying fraud Bjerknes, Mr Suvorov actually WAS in Soviet military Intelligence, had access to archival material and has far more credentials and knowledge in which to draw from. His book was published by the Naval Institute Press. Dennis Wise during his debate against the liar Bjerknes tried to mention this, but Bjerknes simply stated it was false (with no evidence). A few excerpts from Suvorovs book;
“In the years 1937-1941, the Soviet Army grew five-fold, from 1.1 million to 5.5 million… This huge increase in the size of the Soviet Army was accomplished primarily by ratification of the universal military draft in the Soviet Union on September 1, 1939… Stalin knew when he established the draft that in two years, in the summer of 1941, the Soviet Union must enter into a major war. …less than one percent of the Soviet Union’s officers died in Stalin’s purge. Soviet military commanders in 1941 were well-qualified to lead Stalin’s war of aggression against Europe.
Suvorov, Viktor, The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II, Annapolis, Md.: Naval Institute Press, 2008, p. 94.”
“Stalin’s plans for offensive war are also confirmed through his son. During the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, Yakov Iosifovich Dzhugashvili, the son of Stalin, was taken prisoner by the Germans. Stalin’s son was searched and questioned. A letter from another officer dated June 11, 1941 was found in his pockets stating: “I am at the training camps. I would like to be home by fall, but the planned walk to Berlin might hinder this.” German intelligence officers asked Dzhugashvili to clarify the statement about the “planned walk to Berlin.” Stalin’s son read the letter and quietly muttered: “Damn it!” Obviously, the letter indicates that Soviet forces were planning to invade Germany later that year.
Suvorov, Viktor, The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II, Annapolis, Md: Naval Institute Press, 2008, p. 258.”
The evidence for Stalins planned attack on Europe is extensive, but Bjerknes must lie and deny this in order to paint his absurd picture that Hitler was a “communist agent” who invaded the USSR for no other reason than to “lose the war on purpose to spread communism”. It is so absurd, historically incorrect and ignorant it is actually downright embarrassing Bjerknes would even write such garbage. If Bjerknes wants to continue with this ridiculous narrative maybe he should contact Viktor Suvorov himself and show Suvorov all the evidence he has (of which Bjerknes has none) to prove the Soviet Union was not about to invade Europe and that ex-Soviet military intelligence Suvorov is wrong, what a laugh that would be!
We will examine John Wear, author of “Germany’s War” and his assessment of the Soviet buildup;
“Stalin’s more than 200 submarines and the rest of his navy were ineffective at the start of the war because it was an attack fleet. Stalin’s navy was built for aggressive war and could not be used effectively in a defensive war. Entirely different ships with entirely different characteristics are needed for defense: submarine hunters, picket boats, minesweepers, and net-layers. The armament of the Soviet ships was also designed exclusively for participation in a war of aggression. While armed with powerful artillery, mine, and torpedo equipment, Soviet ships had quite weak anti-aircraft armament and defenses.”
“Soviet generals had planned to begin the war with a crushing surprise attack against the enemy’s air bases that annihilated his aviation. When Germany attacked first, the Soviet navy’s lack of anti-aircraft defenses was a major liability. The Soviet war effort was also hurt by the fact that all of the navy’s reserves of shells, mines, torpedoes, and ship fuel had been transported to the German borders and were quickly seized by the Germans when they invaded the Soviet Union.”
John Wear then goes on to recount Suvorov’s studies at the Soviet Army Academy;
“Suvorov had been taught to notice strange occurrences, anomalies, and exceptions to the rules. Suvorov noticed that no matter what happened in the Soviet Union, the government and media always tried to conceal the negative aspects and show the positive. You could not find any negative news about the Soviet Union. Everything was always fine, culture was flourishing, the quality of life was getting better and better, the Soviet Union would soon surpass the United States. A magnitude 7.3 on the Richter scale earthquake that leveled the city of Ashkhabad was not reported; those who spoke about the earthquake were arrested and put into prison for spreading false rumors. Even catastrophes such as the Chernobyl disaster were not reported. After an international investigation exposed the Chernobyl disaster, the Soviets claimed that the Chernobyl accident was completely insignificant and no one should pay any attention to it.
Suvorov noticed one exception to these rules: June 22, 1941, the day Germany attacked the Soviet Union. All Soviet sources talk about the blatant unpreparedness of the Red Army for military action. Soviet sources said that the Soviet Army had no good commanders, that Soviet tanks and airplanes were outdated, that the Soviet Union was totally unprepared for war, and that Stalin was stupid to have trusted Hitler. Suvorov was taught by his intelligence training to look for incoherence. He asked: Why was it that the Soviets, who would HIDE all other mistakes, accidents, and catastrophes, make such a tremendous effort to emphasize the mistakes of the Soviet Union in June 1941?
Suvorov soon realized that Communist historians and propaganda masters had gone out of their way to hide any details that would enable an outsider to construct the reality of what was happening in the Soviet Union at the beginning of the German invasion. Suvorov found a way to construct this reality. While a student at the Academy, Suvorov wrote an independent research paper titled “The Attack of Germany on the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941.” Suvorov explained his interest in the subject by saying to his professors that he wanted to study how Germany prepared for the attack so that a horrible tragedy of this kind would never happen again. The topic of Suvorov’s research was approved and he was given access to closed archives. Suvorov was extra careful not to reveal the real interest of his research.
Suvorov discovered that the Soviet version of World War II history is a lie and that it conceals the Soviet Union’s responsibility for planning the start of the war. The Red Army in June 1941 was the largest, best equipped army in the history of the world. The concentration of Soviet troops on the German border was frightful. If Hitler had not invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Soviet Union would have easily taken over all of Europe. German intelligence correctly saw the massive concentration of Soviet forces on the German border, but it did not see all of the Soviet military preparedness. The real picture was much graver than Germany realized.”
Bjerknes claims Stalin knew about Hitlers impending invasion of the Soviet Union, Suvorov and John Wear remarks on this matter;
“Suvorov has often been asked:
“Why did Adolf Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union surprise Josef Stalin?”
“Stalin had three separate independent espionage agencies working for him. The total power of these agencies was colossal, and testimonies abound about the might of Stalin’s espionage. These Soviet espionage services had penetrated into leading German military and political circles. Soviet military intelligence managed to gain access in Germany to the most secret information from the highest levels of power. Given these facts, the question is:
“How could Hitler have surprised Stalin with his invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941?”
Suvorov says that Hitler knew that it had become impossible to conceal his preparations to invade the Soviet Union. Therefore, Hitler said in secret, in a way that Stalin could hear,
““Yes, I want to attack Stalin after I have finished the war in the west.”
The Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Soviet Armed Forces (GRU) also made extensive studies of all the economic, political, and military aspects of the situation and concluded that Germany could not win a war on two fronts. The GRU concluded that Hitler would not begin a war in the east without first finishing the war in the west. The head of the GRU submitted a detailed report to Stalin on March 20, 1941, which concluded that “the earliest possible date on which operations against the USSR may begin is the moment following victory over England or after an honorable peace for Germany has been achieved.”
John Wear writes;
“Yet on the eve of the German invasion, Soviet intelligence reported that preparations for invasion had not yet begun, and without these preparations it was impossible for Germany to begin the war.
Soviet intelligence believed, with good reason, that a country needed serious preparations to fight the Soviet Union. One of the vital things Germany would need to fight the Soviet Union was sheepskin coats so that its troops could survive the Russian winter. All GRU agents in Europe gathered and analyzed information on sheep in Europe, and on the main sheep-breeding centers and slaughterhouses. As soon as Hitler decided to attack the Soviet Union, Soviet intelligence thought that Germany would order industry to begin producing millions of sheepskin coats. This would be reflected in rising sheepskin prices, and sheepskin coats would be delivered to German divisions. However, sheepskin coats were never delivered to any divisions of the German army.
Soviet intelligence also reasoned that the German army would have to use a new type of lubricating oil for its weaponry and motor fuel for its vehicles for the extremely cold Russian winters. The lubricating oil Germany usually used would congeal in the frost, component parts would freeze together, and the weapons would not work. The normal German motor fuel broke down into incombustible components in heavy frost. The quantities and type of liquid fuels possessed by Germany were not sufficient to conduct deep offensive operations in the Soviet Union. Germany was not even conducting research in the field of creating frost-resistant fuels and oils.
The GRU closely followed many other indicators for warning signals of a German invasion. German soldiers needed boots, warm underwear, sweaters, special tents, hats, heaters, skis, ski wax, masking robes, devices for heating water, and frost-resistant batteries. The German army also needed tanks with broad caterpillar tracks, thousands of cars that could drive in poor road conditions, and so on. The German army had none of these. Outside of a great buildup of German troops on the Soviet border, Germany had made no preparations for war against the Soviet Union. Since the German army had not taken reasonable actions to prepare for war, Stalin and his agents did not believe that Germany would invade the Soviet Union.”
This is a bit of an irony, as the lying fraud Bjerknes tried to claim Hitler intentionally didn’t give his soldiers winter equipment to “lose the war on purpose” but in actual fact, it was because he simply had no time to do so, and was aware Soviet moles would pick up on the preparations.
This is clearly reflected in the fact that Stalins divisions were utterly unprepared and caught with their pants down when the German invasion began.
“John Wear; “Germany’s War – The origins Aftermath and Atrocities of WW II”
Now that we have done a little bit of clarifying that the impending Soviet invasion was legitimate, we will move onto the next claim by the lying fraud Bjerknes, in which he stated that Hitler issued “halt orders” in Smolensk and divided his troops, thus implying an intentional delayed advance on Moscow because Hitler wanted to wait for the Soviets to regroup so he could “lose the war on purpose.”
Bjerknes is playing armchair general here, a little bit of historical context is necessary. Soviet Marshal Semyon K. Timoshenko was dispatched to Smolensk with 5 armies to block the German advance because Smolensk was seen as the final land bridge to Moscow. Hitler was concerned that if the Blitzkrieg forward advance continued the surrounded Red Army forces close to the border in the Byelostok and Minsk pockets would be able escape, Hitler ordered the two generals Hoth and Guderian to slow their advance so the following German infantry which was over 60 miles behind the mechanized units could catch up and create a buffer zone to contain the surrounded Soviet troops. Furthermore, the German supply lines were becoming seriously over stretched. In essence, had the panzer units charged through Smolensk, they would have done so without infantry support for some “14 days” and delayed supplies, as general Guderian himself wrote. This was the reason for the initial delay.
By July 10th, the 29th Motorized Division broke into Smolensk and began fighting the Soviet defenders inside the city. General Heinz Guderians panzer corp moved East on to Yartsevo. By July 16th the German 29th Motorized Division had fully captured Smolensk. Interestingly enough, this is where Stalins son, Lieutenant Yakov Dzhugashvili was captured by German forces.
Generals Heinz Guderian (left) and Herman Hoth (right)
Bjerknes claimed Hitler ordered his divisions to “halt” at Smolensk and divert into different directions to allegedly “stall” the advance to Moscow, but in fact what ACTUALLY happened was after CAPTURING Smolensk, Heinz Guderians 2nd panzer division moved directly East towards Yartsevo and proceeded to capture Yartsevo which is literally the next town on the road to Moscow!. What the hell is Bjerknes talking about?? It was past Yartsevo that Army Group South made contact with the Soviet Fifth Army and problems began.
Bjerknes was a little confused and cant remember his facts right, thats okay, we will help him out.
“The Soviet forces received help from an unexpected quarter when Hitler became concerned with the overall progress of the campaign. The success of Army Group Center was not matched by Army Groups North and South, which were beginning to fall behind schedule in the face of determined Soviet resistance. Especially bothersome for the Germans was the Soviet Fifth Army under Maj. Gen. Mikhail I. Potapov of the Southwestern Front. This army established itself at the easternmost edges of the extensive wooded and swampy area known as the Pripyat Marshes. Its location and active operations threatened both the right flank of Army Group Center and the left flank of Army Group South.
To stabilize the situation on the far-flung wings of the invasion, Hitler effectively ordered Army Group Center to go on the defensive on July 31, while turning Hoth’s panzer group north and Guderian’s south. But first the German high command called for a two-week halt in order to refit and reinforce its frontline formations, particularly panzer and motorized divisions. Without their panzer support, the infantry of Army Group Center conducted mainly local operations of tactical scope. Still, with very minor panzer participation, the German Ninth Field Army successfully trapped and largely destroyed the Soviet Twenty-First Army in the area of Gomel and the Twenty-Eighth Army in the area of Roslavl in early August.”
Bjerknes claims this was Hitlers “intentional sabotage” of the war to avoid taking Moscow and allow the Soviets time to regroup, but what was actually happening was Army Group Center was getting ahead of Army groups North and South because of stiffened Soviet resistance on their flanks, Particularly the Soviet Fifth Army encamped in very difficult wooded, swampy terrain causing Army Group South delays which would have resulted in Army Group Center getting so far ahead that it would have created a POCKET that would have been easy for the Soviets to cut off and ENCIRCLE had they continued marching towards Moscow. This is basic warfare strategy, progressively moving the unified front forwards without creating bulges and pockets. Hoth and Guderians orders to “split forces” north and south was in actuality, an attempt to avoid getting caught in a pocket!. Bjerknes is either lying on purpose, or is a total buffoon. Hitlers halt orders were to do the following;
1) Stop Army Group Center from being overstretched, isolated, cut off and encircled.
2) Re-arm and resupply the 3 armies.
If Hitler had gone with the Bjerknes’ idiotic war strategy of sending Army Group Center full steam ahead towards Moscow while Army groups North and South were delayed in stiff Soviet resistance, then Army Group Center would have been easily outflanked, encircled, cut off from supplies and utterly destroyed causing the eastern front to collapse long before winter, which would have been so stupid it really would have looked like Hitler was trying to lose the war on purpose.
Folks, I am certainly no military historian, this is all a result of having just passively read these historical events. The lying fraud Bjerknes basically counts on his victims not investigating any of this.
The final point we will come to on this topic, is in response to the lying fraud Bjerknes statement that Hitler “slaughtered Slavs” because he was a communist helping spread communism apparently. Most of this hardly makes sense folks but that’s really what the guy said during the debate. In my prior article I touched upon this and apparently need to reference it again.
First we will examine the ‘Prague Manifesto’ that is a joint German-Russian agreement as to what Russia was to look like after the overthrow and defeat of the communists. Take a look at it, and tell me does this look like a communist plan cooked up by the communist Hitler trying to spread communism?
“As the basis for a new government for the peoples of Russia the committee places the following major principles:
1) The equality of all peoples of Russia and a real right for national development, self determination, self rule, and governmental independence.
2) The confirmation of a popular worker front, before which the interests of the government are subordinate to the goals of raising the well-being and development of the nation.
3) The preservation of peace and the establishment of peaceful relations with all nations of the world, an all round development of international collaboration.
4) Wide ranging government actions for the strengthening of the family and marriage. A true equality for women.
5) The liquidation of forced labor and the granting to the laborers a real right to free labor which creates their material well-being, the confirmation of a wage for all types of labor in an amount that can support an appropriate standard of living.
6) The liquidation of collective farms, the free return of land to the private ownership of farmers. The freedom to determine labor land usage. The freedom to use the products of one’s personal labor, the abolishment of forced requisitions, and the cancellation of all debts to the Soviet government.
7) The establishment of protected private labor ownership. The reestablishment of trade, crafts, domestic industry, the granting of the right of private initiative and an opportunity for it to participate in the economic life of the nation.
8) Granting the intelligencia the opportunity to freely create for the well-being of their people.
9)Granting social justice and defense of laborers from any exploitation, regardless of their origin and former activities.
10) The creation for all without exception the real right for free education, medical care, vacation, and senior welfare.
11) The destruction of the regime of terror and force. Liquidation of forceful repopulations and mass exiles. The establishment of a true freedom of religion, conscience, speech, assembly, press. A guarantee of the protection of person, property, and home. The equality of all before the law, the independence and clarity of the court.
12) The liberation of political opponents of Bolshevism and the return to the motherland from the jails and camps of all who were repressed for their battle against Bolshevism. No revenge and persecution for those who stop their battle for Stalin and Bolshevism, regardless of whether this was done by necessity or by conviction.
13) The reestablishment of national property ruined during the war – cities, villages, factories, and plants at cost to the government.
14) Government support of invalids of the war and their families.
The destruction of Bolshevism is the uncompromised aim of all progressive powers. The Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia is certain that the united efforts of the peoples of Russia will find support amidst all free loving peoples of the world.
The Liberation Movement of the Peoples of Russia is a continuation of a many years long battle against Bolshevism, for freedom, peace, and fairness. The successful completion of this battle is now provided for by:
a) The accumulation of greater experience than during that of the revolution of 1917.
b) The accumulation of growing and organized military forces – the Russian Liberation Army, the Ukrainian Liberation Forces, Cossack forces and national detachments
c) The accumulation of anti-Bolshevik armed forces in the Soviet rear.
d) The accumulation of growing oppositional powers within the people, government apparatus, and army of the USSR.”
Why would Hitler even bother having this created if he hated Slavs and wanted to lose the war on purpose? Actually, here’s an even better question, why did Hitler allow 800,000 anti-communist Slavic Russians to join the Russian Liberation Army? (ROA) And how does that reflect the actions of a man who’s trying to lose the war on purpose? You see, Bjerknes as usual has to leave out the fine details of history to reach his absurd conclusions.
A good video breaking down the magnitude of the Russian Liberation Army below with historical footage and speeches from the joint Russian-German communist liberation forces themselves;
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AnZwTlVpXE6u/
We will conclude here, in the third installment we will address Bjerknes claims about why Hitler declared war on the United States, the Dunkirk incident, Freemasonry, Kurt Eisner and many many other topics. Stay tuned!
Sources –
– John Wear – Germany’s War
– Wears War “Stalin’s Preparations For An Offensive War In The Summer of 1941 To Make Europe A Soviet-Communist Continent”
-Viktor Suvorov – “The Chief Culprit.”
-Warfare History Network, “Barbarossa and holding the line and Smolensk”
-National Vanguard – “What Kind of Socialism is National-Socialism?”
– National Vanguard – “Schacht and Hitler”
-Counter Currents – “Funding a Movement”
– CODOH – “The Myth of Big Business, Nazi Axis”
– Veterans Today/Mike King – “Hatespeech and Controversy Corner: Defense of Hitler”
Share now!
Author: Doug Thomas Sincere truth seeker just adding a piece to the puzzle. Sincere truth seeker just adding a piece to the puzzle.