renegadetribune--2020-05-31--The Holocaust Is Not Just A Lie, It Is A Crime

It is a crime because it not only justifies innumerable other crimes , but because it creates a huge mass of hatred , which in turn contains the potential for new crimes .
People whose souls have been drenched in the hatred of the Holocaust Lie must be counted among its victims .
This includes the millions of twelve to fifteen-year old school children dragged through the memorials of former concentration camps , often weeping uncontrollably at the atrocity stories and lies vomited up at them .
How much suffering , how much heartbreak , how many tragedies are due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this hair-raising Lie of the Century , which the jews invented , crammed down our throats , and have defended tooth and nail , with fines , with abuse , with imprisonment , for over half a century ?
It is painful to think of the thousands , indeed tens of thousands , of people who have been humiliated , persecuted , imprisoned , or even executed in the name of this shameless swindle .
It is pathetic to see the once-great German people , having lost its pride , its sense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such an extent that it no longer dares to defend itself against a flood of slander and is too ashamed to look itself in the face .
One single mention of the “ gas chambers ” , the extermination of the jews , was enough to justify purging entire cities and provinces of their German population .
Almost 17 million people were driven from their homes between 1944 and 1948 in an unbroken series of atrocities during which over two million died .
“ After what they did to the jews , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the classical justification .
It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over the world watching Marvin Chomsky , Claude Lanzmann , Steven Spielberg and all the others — Holocaust , Shoa , Schindler ’ s List , etc .
— in the cinemas , on television — and taking it all seriously .
The jews invented a story which they ’ ve called the Shoa or the Holocaust , and which they now claim is the history of their people .
The Holocaust money-making machine has brought @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can no longer live without it .
But they made one fatal error : the Holocaust swindle is so endlessly absurd that its inventors can only take refuge in a suicide charge ; having lost all sense of proportion , they have gone too far and will soon come crashing down .
To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an impossibility in the long run , despite all manner of repression .
From minor explanations to wholesale re-writing , including whole new “ Revised Versions ” , the profiteers of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ greater numbers of contradictions ; the fables of today contradict the fables told yesterday ; the defenders of the official version of history are being compelled to make so many concessions that more and more people are starting to wonder about it all .
Doubts expressed in private conversation no longer shock as much as they did a few years ago ; it is getting easier for revisionists to gain a hearing .
In brief : for the exterminationists , the time is running out .
Increasingly hysterical repression is an unmistakable sign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sign of weakness .
Instead of listening to the discussion , they simply grab for a truncheon .
But how long can they get away with it ?
The revisionists must not hope for quick victory ; it will not come overnight .
They should remember the wisdom expressed in the phrase from the Czech philosopher , Karel Capek , who said : “ Truth must be smuggled .
It must be distributed in small doses .
A drop here , a drop there — until people get used to it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without hindrance , we would like to close with an optimistic message .
We wish to make the following appeal : All of you , all friends of the truth , both known and unknown , from many European countries , those who , like Günter Deckert and Gottfried Küssel , sit in German and Austrian prisons for “ denying the existence of the gas chambers , ” or who have been compelled to go into exile like Remer and Rudolf , all persecuted revisionists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ courage , since your struggle against state-ordained lies is not in vain .
Your courage , the sacrifice of a few , will help to free entire nations and peoples , including the German and Russian peoples — from the darkness which has so long covered them .

By Jürgen Graf
Published 1997
It is a crime because it not only justifies innumerable other crimes, but because it creates a huge mass of hatred, which in turn contains the potential for new crimes.
People whose souls have been drenched in the hatred of the Holocaust Lie must be counted among its victims. This includes the millions of twelve to fifteen-year old school children dragged through the memorials of former concentration camps, often weeping uncontrollably at the atrocity stories and lies vomited up at them.
How much suffering, how much heartbreak, how many tragedies are due to the so called “Holocaust”, this hair-raising Lie of the Century, which the jews invented, crammed down our throats, and have defended tooth and nail, with fines, with abuse, with imprisonment, for over half a century?
It is painful to think of the thousands, indeed tens of thousands, of people who have been humiliated, persecuted, imprisoned, or even executed in the name of this shameless swindle.
It is pathetic to see the once-great German people, having lost its pride, its sense of direction, its self-respect, to such an extent that it no longer dares to defend itself against a flood of slander and is too ashamed to look itself in the face.
One single mention of the “gas chambers”, the extermination of the jews, was enough to justify purging entire cities and provinces of their German population. Almost 17 million people were driven from their homes between 1944 and 1948 in an unbroken series of atrocities during which over two million died.
“After what they did to the jews, they had it coming to them,” is the classical justification.
It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over the world watching Marvin Chomsky, Claude Lanzmann, Steven Spielberg and all the others — Holocaust, Shoa, Schindler’s List, etc. — in the cinemas, on television — and taking it all seriously.
The jews invented a story which they’ve called the Shoa or the Holocaust, and which they now claim is the history of their people.
The Holocaust money-making machine has brought them such tremendous advantages, that they can no longer live without it. But they made one fatal error: the Holocaust swindle is so endlessly absurd that its inventors can only take refuge in a suicide charge; having lost all sense of proportion, they have gone too far and will soon come crashing down.
To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an impossibility in the long run, despite all manner of repression.
From minor explanations to wholesale re-writing, including whole new “Revised Versions”, the profiteers of the myth continue to entangle themselves in increasingly greater numbers of contradictions; the fables of today contradict the fables told yesterday; the defenders of the official version of history are being compelled to make so many concessions that more and more people are starting to wonder about it all.
Doubts expressed in private conversation no longer shock as much as they did a few years ago; it is getting easier for revisionists to gain a hearing.
In brief: for the exterminationists, the time is running out. Increasingly hysterical repression is an unmistakable sign of growing panic.
It is also a sign of weakness.
Instead of listening to the discussion, they simply grab for a truncheon. But how long can they get away with it?
The revisionists must not hope for quick victory; it will not come overnight. They should remember the wisdom expressed in the phrase from the Czech philosopher, Karel Capek, who said:
“Truth must be smuggled. It must be distributed in small doses. A drop here, a drop there — until people get used to it. Not all at once.”
At a time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without hindrance, we would like to close with an optimistic message. We wish to make the following appeal:
All of you, all friends of the truth, both known and unknown, from many European countries, those who, like Günter Deckert and Gottfried Küssel, sit in German and Austrian prisons for “denying the existence of the gas chambers,” or who have been compelled to go into exile like Remer and Rudolf, all persecuted revisionists and nationalists — do not lose your courage, since your struggle against state-ordained lies is not in vain.
Your courage, the sacrifice of a few, will help to free entire nations and peoples, including the German and Russian peoples — from the darkness which has so long covered them.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


The Usurer God

Renegade Editor ’ s Note : This is a fictional story , but it sounds oddly familiar , doesn ’ t it ?
By Lord Dunsany From Time and the Gods [ 1905 ] The men of Zonu hold that Yahn is God , who sits as a usurer behind a heap of little lustrous gems and ever clutches at them with both his arms .
Scarce larger than a drop of water are the gleaming jewels that lie under the grasping talons of Yahn , and every jewel is a life .
Men tell in Zonu that the earth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and on it no life stirred .
Then Yahn lured to him shadows whose home was beyond the Rim , who knew little of joys and nought of any sorrow , whose place was beyond the Rim before the birth of Time .
These Yahn lured to him and showed them his heap of gems ; and in the jewels there was light , and green fields glistened in them , and there were glimpses of blue sky and little streams , and very faintly little gardens showed that flowered in orchard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the heaven , and some showed the arch of the sky with a waste plain drawn across it , with grasses bent in the wind and never aught but the plain .
But the gems that changed the most had in their centre the ever changing sea .
Then the shadows gazed into the Lives and saw the green fields and the sea and earth and the gardens of earth .
And Yahn said : “ I will loan you each a Life , and you may do your work with it upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ each a shadow for his servant in green fields and in gardens , only for these things you shall polish these Lives with experience and cut their edges with your griefs , and in the end shall return them again to me.
” And thereto the shadows consented , that they might have gleaming Lives and have shadows for their servants , and this thing became the Law .
But the shadows , each with his Life , departed and came to Zonu and to other lands , and there with experience they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cut them with human griefs until they gleamed anew .
And ever they found new scenes to gleam within these Lives , and cities and sails and men shone in them where there had been before only green fields and sea , and ever Yahn the usurer cried out to remind them of their bargain .
When men added to their Lives scenes that were pleasant to Yahn , then was Yahn silent , but when they added scenes that pleased not the eyes of Yahn , then did he take a toll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Law .
But men forgot the usurer , and there arose some claiming to be wise in the Law , who said that after their labour , which they wrought upon their Lives , was done , those Lives should be theirs to possess ; so men took comfort from their toil and labour and the grinding and cutting of their griefs .
But as their Lives began to shine with experience of many things , the thumb and forefinger of Yahn would suddenly close upon a Life , and the man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Rim the shadows say : “ We have greatly laboured for Yahn , and have gathered griefs in the world , and caused his Lives to shine , and Yahn doeth nought for us .
Far better had we stayed where no cares are , floating beyond the Rim.
” And there the shadows fear lest ever again they be lured by specious promises to suffer usury at the hands of Yahn , who is overskilled in Law .
Only Yahn sits and smiles , watching his hoard increase in preciousness , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shadows whom he hath lured from their quiet to toil in the form of men .
And ever Yahn lures more shadows and sends them to brighten his Lives , sending the old Lives out again to make them brighter still ; and sometimes he gives to a shadow a Life that was once a king ’ s and sendeth him with it down to the earth to play the part of a beggar , or sometimes he sendeth a beggar ’ s Life to play the part of a king .
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been promised by those that claim to be wise in the Law that their Lives which they have toiled at shall be theirs to possess for ever , yet the men of Zonu fear that Yahn is greater and overskilled in the Law .
Moreover it hath been said that Time will bring the hour when the wealth of Yahn shall be such as his dreams have lusted for .
Then shall Yahn leave the earth at rest and trouble the shadows no more , but sit and gloat with his unseemly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for his soul is a usurer ’ s soul .
But others say , and they swear that this is true , that there are gods of Old , who be far greater than Yahn , who made the Law wherein Yahn is overskilled , and who will one day drive a bargain with him that shall be too hard for Yahn .
Then Yahn shall wander away , a mean forgotten god , and perchance in some forsaken land shall haggle with the rain for a drop of water to drink , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s soul .
And the Lives—who knoweth the gods of Old or what Their will shall be ?

Renegade Editor’s Note: This is a fictional story, but it sounds oddly familiar, doesn’t it?
By Lord Dunsany
From Time and the Gods [1905]
The men of Zonu hold that Yahn is God, who sits as a usurer behind a heap of little lustrous gems and ever clutches at them with both his arms. Scarce larger than a drop of water are the gleaming jewels that lie under the grasping talons of Yahn, and every jewel is a life. Men tell in Zonu that the earth was empty when Yahn devised his plan, and on it no life stirred. Then Yahn lured to him shadows whose home was beyond the Rim, who knew little of joys and nought of any sorrow, whose place was beyond the Rim before the birth of Time. These Yahn lured to him and showed them his heap of gems; and in the jewels there was light, and green fields glistened in them, and there were glimpses of blue sky and little streams, and very faintly little gardens showed that flowered in orchard lands. And some showed winds in the heaven, and some showed the arch of the sky with a waste plain drawn across it, with grasses bent in the wind and never aught but the plain. But the gems that changed the most had in their centre the ever changing sea. Then the shadows gazed into the Lives and saw the green fields and the sea and earth and the gardens of earth. And Yahn said: “I will loan you each a Life, and you may do your work with it upon the Scheme of Things, and have each a shadow for his servant in green fields and in gardens, only for these things you shall polish these Lives with experience and cut their edges with your griefs, and in the end shall return them again to me.”
And thereto the shadows consented, that they might have gleaming Lives and have shadows for their servants, and this thing became the Law. But the shadows, each with his Life, departed and came to Zonu and to other lands, and there with experience they polished the Lives of Yahn, and cut them with human griefs until they gleamed anew. And ever they found new scenes to gleam within these Lives, and cities and sails and men shone in them where there had been before only green fields and sea, and ever Yahn the usurer cried out to remind them of their bargain. When men added to their Lives scenes that were pleasant to Yahn, then was Yahn silent, but when they added scenes that pleased not the eyes of Yahn, then did he take a toll of sorrow from them because it was the Law.
But men forgot the usurer, and there arose some claiming to be wise in the Law, who said that after their labour, which they wrought upon their Lives, was done, those Lives should be theirs to possess; so men took comfort from their toil and labour and the grinding and cutting of their griefs. But as their Lives began to shine with experience of many things, the thumb and forefinger of Yahn would suddenly close upon a Life, and the man became a shadow. But away beyond the Rim the shadows say:
“We have greatly laboured for Yahn, and have gathered griefs in the world, and caused his Lives to shine, and Yahn doeth nought for us. Far better had we stayed where no cares are, floating beyond the Rim.”
And there the shadows fear lest ever again they be lured by specious promises to suffer usury at the hands of Yahn, who is overskilled in Law. Only Yahn sits and smiles, watching his hoard increase in preciousness, and hath no pity for the poor shadows whom he hath lured from their quiet to toil in the form of men.
And ever Yahn lures more shadows and sends them to brighten his Lives, sending the old Lives out again to make them brighter still; and sometimes he gives to a shadow a Life that was once a king’s and sendeth him with it down to the earth to play the part of a beggar, or sometimes he sendeth a beggar’s Life to play the part of a king. What careth Yahn?
The men of Zonu have been promised by those that claim to be wise in the Law that their Lives which they have toiled at shall be theirs to possess for ever, yet the men of Zonu fear that Yahn is greater and overskilled in the Law. Moreover it hath been said that Time will bring the hour when the wealth of Yahn shall be such as his dreams have lusted for. Then shall Yahn leave the earth at rest and trouble the shadows no more, but sit and gloat with his unseemly face over his hoard of Lives, for his soul is a usurer’s soul. But others say, and they swear that this is true, that there are gods of Old, who be far greater than Yahn, who made the Law wherein Yahn is overskilled, and who will one day drive a bargain with him that shall be too hard for Yahn. Then Yahn shall wander away, a mean forgotten god, and perchance in some forsaken land shall haggle with the rain for a drop of water to drink, for his soul is a usurer’s soul. And the Lives—who knoweth the gods of Old or what Their will shall be?
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-05-31--New Study Links Brain Tumors to Power Lines Exposure

It may seem like warnings have only been cited about the many health risks associated with exposure to sources of wireless radiation ( i.e .
5G , Bluetooth , cell phone and WiFi radiation ) .
However , there have been warnings about exposure risks from additional sources of Electromagnetic Radiation ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) for many years as well .
This includes power lines .
Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for reporting about a new study that determined a link between power lines and brain tumors , as well as including additional research that proves harm from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published a new study entitled “ Residential proximity to power lines and risk of brain tumor in the general population ” which found an increased risk of brain tumors was associated with living near power lines .
Powerlines are a source of residential exposure to magnetic field electromagnetic radiation ( EMF ) and repeated research studies for decades have associated magnetic field power-line frequency ELF-EMF from power lines to a type of childhood leukemia .
In 2001 the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that exposure to power-line frequency ELF-EMF is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based largely evidence of an increased risk for childhood leukemias with residential exposure .
Kaiser Permanente researchers have published several studies linking pregnant women ’ s exposure to magnetic field electromagnetic fields to not only increased miscarriage and but also increased ADHD , obesity and asthma in the woman ’ s prenatally exposed children .
Two published studies by the Ramazzini Institute “ Carcinogenic Synergism of S-50 Hz MF Plus Formaldehyde in Rats ” ( 2016 ) and “ Life-span exposure to sinusoidal-50 Hz magnetic field and acute low-dose γ radiation induce carcinogenic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) found that ELF exposed rats had statistically significant increased incidence of several type of malignant tumors when combined with a known carcinogen .
Over a dozen countries already have some level of protective policy in place regarding this type of electromagnetic radiation .
The countries of Croatia , Finland , France , Israel , Italy , Netherlands , Norway , Slovenia , Switzerland , Germany , Spain , Belgium ( Wallonia , Flanders ) Denmark , Liechtenstein , Luxemburg , Lithuania , Poland have a magnetic field radiation limit for “ sensitive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Sensitive areas are generally defined as areas where children live and play such as schools , kindergartens or recreation areas .
Sometimes the definition includes hospitals and residential areas .
These countries ’ magnetic field EMF limits are 3 or 4 milligauss , the level of milligauss associated with childhood leukemia in repeated published studies .
However ICNIRP recommends a residential magnetic field exposure limit of 2,000 milligauss ( mG ) and an occupational exposure limit of 10,000 mG .
The United States has no limit on legal levels of milligauss electromagnetic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Education enacted a regulation to require minimum distances between new schools and the edge of a transmission line “ right-of-way.
” Environmental Health Trust has resources on how to reduce magnetic field EMFs HERE .
In this study , ELF-MF exposure was estimated from power line location and exposure to power lines was assessed by a lifetime geographical index .
Camille Carles , Yolande Esquirol , Maxime Turuban , Clément Piel , Lucile Migault , Camille Pouchieu , Ghislaine Bouvier , Pascale Fabbro-Peray , Pierre Lebailly , Isabelle Baldi , Residential proximity to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the general population , Environmental Research , Volume 185 , 2020 , 109473 , ISSN 0013-9351 , https : //doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109473 .
Despite this study ’ s limitations , our results strongly suggest that the risk of brain tumor , and particularly gliomas could be associated with residential ELF-MF exposure estimated by proximity of power lines , as several previous studies have already pointed out.
” • “ Our main results are consistent with previous studies on environmental exposure to ELF-MF and brain tumors ( Marcilio et al.
, 2011 ; Baldi et @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 2013 ) although the risk levels found in our study are higher.
” • “ We observed significant association for the highest exposure to cumulative duration at less than 50 m to any line and high voltage lines but not for very high voltage lines… ” • “ 3.3.1 .
All brain tumors ( Table 4 ) Concerning the cumulative duration at less than 50 m from any power line , a significant association was observed with brain tumors for people exposed for 15 years ( OR 4.33 , 95 % CI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever exposed or exposed for 5 and 10 years.
” • “ We observed some significant positive associations between cumulative duration at less than 50 m to any line for exposure above 15 years and brain tumors ( OR 4.33 , 95 % CI 1.11–16.9 ) and meningioma ( OR 8.53 , 95 % CI 1.48–49.17 ) .
Gliomas were also significantly associated with cumulative duration at less than 50 m but only for ever/never exposure to any line ( OR 3.23 , 95 % CI 1.33–7.82 ) and high voltage lines ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
No association was found between brain tumors , gliomas or meningiomas and cumulative duration in exposure corridors.
” Another source of harmful “ Electrosmog ” : digital and wireless electric , gas , and water “ Smart ” Meters .
Since tens of millions have been installed worldwide , it ’ s likely that they have been installed on your home and throughout your community even if your utility company doesn ’ t refer to them as “ Smart.
” Utility customers and even elected officials have opposed their installation since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years ago .
Opposition to these problematic meters continues to increase worldwide due to the many issues associated with them ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ) including fires and explosions ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
Activist Post reports regularly about sources of “ Electrosmog ” .
For more information visit our archives and the following websites :

It may seem like warnings have only been cited about the many health risks associated with exposure to sources of wireless radiation (i.e. 5G, Bluetooth, cell phone and WiFi radiation). However, there have been warnings about exposure risks from additional sources of Electromagnetic Radiation (aka “Electrosmog”) for many years as well. This includes power lines.
Thanks to Environmental Health Trust for reporting about a new study that determined a link between power lines and brain tumors, as well as including additional research that proves harm from exposure.
The journal Environmental Research has published a new study entitled “Residential proximity to power lines and risk of brain tumor in the general population” which found an increased risk of brain tumors was associated with living near power lines. Powerlines are a source of residential exposure to magnetic field electromagnetic radiation (EMF) and repeated research studies for decades have associated magnetic field power-line frequency ELF-EMF from power lines to a type of childhood leukemia.
In 2001 the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that exposure to power-line frequency ELF-EMF is a “possible” human carcinogen- a decision based largely evidence of an increased risk for childhood leukemias with residential exposure .
Kaiser Permanente researchers have published several studies linking pregnant women’s exposure to magnetic field electromagnetic fields to not only increased miscarriage and but also increased ADHD, obesity and asthma in the woman’s prenatally exposed children.
Two published studies by the Ramazzini Institute “Carcinogenic Synergism of S-50 Hz MF Plus Formaldehyde in Rats” (2016) and “Life-span exposure to sinusoidal-50 Hz magnetic field and acute low-dose γ radiation induce carcinogenic effects in Sprague-Dawley rats” (2016) found that ELF exposed rats had statistically significant increased incidence of several type of malignant tumors when combined with a known carcinogen.
Over a dozen countries already have some level of protective policy in place regarding this type of electromagnetic radiation. The countries of Croatia, Finland, France, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, Belgium (Wallonia, Flanders) Denmark, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Lithuania, Poland have a magnetic field radiation limit for “sensitive areas” far far lower than ICNIRP. Sensitive areas are generally defined as areas where children live and play such as schools, kindergartens or recreation areas. Sometimes the definition includes hospitals and residential areas. These countries’ magnetic field EMF limits are 3 or 4 milligauss, the level of milligauss associated with childhood leukemia in repeated published studies. However ICNIRP recommends a residential magnetic field exposure limit of 2,000 milligauss (mG) and an occupational exposure limit of 10,000 mG.
The United States has no limit on legal levels of milligauss electromagnetic radiation. However the California Department of Education enacted a regulation to require minimum distances between new schools and the edge of a transmission line “right-of-way.”
Environmental Health Trust has resources on how to reduce magnetic field EMFs HERE.
In this study, ELF-MF exposure was estimated from power line location and exposure to power lines was assessed by a lifetime geographical index.
Camille Carles, Yolande Esquirol, Maxime Turuban, Clément Piel, Lucile Migault, Camille Pouchieu, Ghislaine Bouvier, Pascale Fabbro-Peray, Pierre Lebailly, Isabelle Baldi, Residential proximity to power lines and risk of brain tumor in the general population, Environmental Research, Volume 185, 2020, 109473, ISSN 0013-9351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109473.
Excerpts from the study;
Despite this study’s limitations, our results strongly suggest that the risk of brain tumor, and particularly gliomas could be associated with residential ELF-MF exposure estimated by proximity of power lines, as several previous studies have already pointed out.”
“Our main results are consistent with previous studies on environmental exposure to ELF-MF and brain tumors (Marcilio et al., 2011; Baldi et al., 2011; Elliott et al., 2013) although the risk levels found in our study are higher.”
“We observed significant association for the highest exposure to cumulative duration at less than 50 m to any line and high voltage lines but not for very high voltage lines…”
“3.3.1. All brain tumors (Table 4) Concerning the cumulative duration at less than 50 m from any power line, a significant association was observed with brain tumors for people exposed for 15 years (OR 4.33, 95%CI 1.11–16.9), but not for people ever exposed or exposed for 5 and 10 years.”
“We observed some significant positive associations between cumulative duration at less than 50 m to any line for exposure above 15 years and brain tumors (OR 4.33, 95%CI 1.11–16.9) and meningioma (OR 8.53, 95%CI 1.48–49.17). Gliomas were also significantly associated with cumulative duration at less than 50 m but only for ever/never exposure to any line (OR 3.23, 95%CI 1.33–7.82) and high voltage lines (OR 4.96, 95%CI 1.56–15.77). No association was found between brain tumors, gliomas or meningiomas and cumulative duration in exposure corridors.”
Another source of harmful “Electrosmog”: digital and wireless electric, gas, and water “Smart” Meters. Since tens of millions have been installed worldwide, it’s likely that they have been installed on your home and throughout your community even if your utility company doesn’t refer to them as “Smart.” Utility customers and even elected officials have opposed their installation since they started being “rolled out” years ago. Opposition to these problematic meters continues to increase worldwide due to the many issues associated with them (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) including fires and explosions (see 1, 2, 3).
Activist Post reports regularly about sources of “Electrosmog”. For more information visit our archives and the following websites:
Source: Activist Post
Image: Pixabay
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-05-31--Black Society or White Society?

Black Society or White Society?

Remember all that talk about how much we are enriched by having Black people living all around us ?
I @ @ @ @ @ are feeling right now .

Remember all that talk about how much we are enriched by having Black people living all around us? I wonder how enriched city dwellers are feeling right now.


renegadetribune--2020-05-31--Trump’s Executive Order On Social Media Opens the Door To Bigger Government Regulation Tyranny

U.S. President Donald Trump ’ s executive order weaponizes Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act against social media companies , the provision that is often used to protect against being legally responsible for what users post on their networks .
There is no doubt in anyone ’ s mind that Twitter , Facebook , and YouTube — more appropriately named BIG social — is censoring users .
However , the solution of more government regulation is a door now being opened into much harsher conditions for users under the guise of protecting free speech .
Trump signed an executive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter called two of his tweets “ potentially misleading , ” in a fact check .
Speaking from the Oval Office ahead of signing the historic order , Trump said the move was to “ defend free speech from one of the gravest dangers it has faced in American history.
” “ A small handful of social media monopolies controls a vast portion of all public and private communications in the United States , ” he stated , “ They ’ ve had unchecked power to censor , restrict , edit , shape @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form of communication between private citizens and large public audiences.
” Handing power over to the government to police social media networks won ’ t fix the problem of censorship , it will enable it even more .
There are also legal challenges to a proposal to use Section 230 against corporations .
In essence , this is an attempt to do something similar to what the EARN IT Act being put through Congress is attempting to do , weaponizing section 230 of the Communications Decency Act .
Section 230 is a 1996 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for content created or shared by their users .
As Activist Post previously reported , Congress is seeking to ban companies from using end-to-end encryption and impose penalties for businesses that use it .
Barr , Sen. Lindsey Graham ( R-SC ) , and Sen .
Senator Richard Blumenthal ( D-CT ) are targeting encryption with a new draft bill called the “ Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies ( or EARN IT ) Act.
” The act would modify the Communications Decency Act ’ s Section 230 to make companies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawsuits over child abuse and exploitation if they don ’ t follow practices set by a national commission , according to Engadget .
Although , many say Trump ’ s recent executive order may be unconstitutional because it risks infringing on the First Amendment rights of private companies , and because it attempts to circumvent the two other branches of government : the courts and Congress .
The Senator who was the lead legislative body behind Section 230 also chimed in .
Under the order , the Commerce Department would ask the Federal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a company ’ s conduct might violate the good faith provisions of Section 230 with the goal of making it easier to sue tech companies .
Further , the order would direct the Federal Trade Commission to report on complaints about political bias collected by the White House and to consider bringing federal lawsuits against companies accused of violating the administration ’ s interpretation of Section 230 .
However , Wired reports that Trump has little power over how social media companies operate and that the order is just for show .
Let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the way : As a legal matter , that last part is nonsense .
The FCC has little to no power over the meaning of Section 230 , because the law itself is extremely clear .
Passed in 1996 , it was designed to solve a problem that plagued web forums in the early years of the internet .
According to the prevailing legal doctrine at the time , a site was not liable for content posted by its users ; for legal purposes , it qualified as a “ distributor , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any type of content moderation , however , exposed a site to publisher liability .
This created a powerful incentive to allow a free-for-all devoid of even the most minimal standards around things like obscenity , racism , and libel .
Section 230 addressed that problem by letting websites keep their immunity and moderate user content as they see fit , “ whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.
” In other words , the law gives website operators essentially free rein to decide what kind of speech is allowed on their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re not using those powers in ways that violate their own terms of service or are otherwise fraudulent .
That broad mandate doesn ’ t leave much room for Trump or the FCC to play around .
The EFF also criticizes the order stating its a violation of the First Amendment ; and if the draft order is the same final order which it appears to be , then it won ’ t survive the courts .
“ The good news is that , assuming the final order looks like the draft we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t survive judicial scrutiny .
To see why , let ’ s take a deeper look at its incorrect reading of Section 230 ( 47 U.S.C .
§ 230 ) and how the order violates the First Amendment , ” the EFF wrote .
The provisions regarding the FTC could raise additional legal questions , as the FTC is an independent agency that does not take orders from the President nor has the authority to repeal Section 230 , which would have to go through Congress .
Others argue that the order isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work because it is about intimidation , Insider reported .
Nonetheless , Trump ’ s administration appears to be ready for that fight and is looking to rescind Section 230 protections .
Just as Barr doesn ’ t realize what is at stake when it comes to encryption , only seeing the dark side of things .
If Section 230 were to be revoked it could harm more than just social media , putting other online businesses like Airbnb , Google , Tripadvisor and many others in the cross hairs as well , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ video of Trump signing the landmark executive order that will give big government more power than ever over social media .
The next step is challenging this executive order in court ; because if it passes , this could be the first door opened to more regulation and in turn the beginning of the death of a free and open internet .
Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post , where this article first appeared .

By Aaron Kesel
U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order weaponizes Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act against social media companies, the provision that is often used to protect against being legally responsible for what users post on their networks.
There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube — more appropriately named BIG social — is censoring users. However, the solution of more government regulation is a door now being opened into much harsher conditions for users under the guise of protecting free speech.
Trump signed an executive order targeting social media companies days after Twitter called two of his tweets “potentially misleading,” in a fact check.
Speaking from the Oval Office ahead of signing the historic order, Trump said the move was to “defend free speech from one of the gravest dangers it has faced in American history.”
“A small handful of social media monopolies controls a vast portion of all public and private communications in the United States,” he stated, “They’ve had unchecked power to censor, restrict, edit, shape, hide, alter, virtually any form of communication between private citizens and large public audiences.”
Handing power over to the government to police social media networks won’t fix the problem of censorship, it will enable it even more. There are also legal challenges to a proposal to use Section 230 against corporations. In essence, this is an attempt to do something similar to what the EARN IT Act being put through Congress is attempting to do, weaponizing section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Section 230 is a 1996 law that shields online platforms from liability for content created or shared by their users.
As Activist Post previously reported, Congress is seeking to ban companies from using end-to-end encryption and impose penalties for businesses that use it. Barr, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Sen. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) are targeting encryption with a new draft bill called the “Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies (or EARN IT) Act.” The act would modify the Communications Decency Act’s Section 230 to make companies liable in state criminal cases and civil lawsuits over child abuse and exploitation if they don’t follow practices set by a national commission, according to Engadget.
Although, many say Trump’s recent executive order may be unconstitutional because it risks infringing on the First Amendment rights of private companies, and because it attempts to circumvent the two other branches of government: the courts and Congress.
“Trump has no authority to rewrite a congressional statute with an executive order imposing a flawed interpretation of Section 230. Section 230 incentivizes platforms to host all sorts of content without fear of being held liable for it. It enables speech, not censorship,” Kate Ruane, senior legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union said.
The Senator who was the lead legislative body behind Section 230 also chimed in.
Trump is trying to steal for himself the power of the courts and Congress to rewrite decades of settled law,” said Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the architect of the legislation that the order seeks to reinterpret. “He decides what’s legal based on what’s in his interest.
Under the order, the Commerce Department would ask the Federal Communications Commission for new regulations clarifying when a company’s conduct might violate the good faith provisions of Section 230 with the goal of making it easier to sue tech companies.
Further, the order would direct the Federal Trade Commission to report on complaints about political bias collected by the White House and to consider bringing federal lawsuits against companies accused of violating the administration’s interpretation of Section 230.
However, Wired reports that Trump has little power over how social media companies operate and that the order is just for show.
Let’s get one thing out of the way: As a legal matter, that last part is nonsense. The FCC has little to no power over the meaning of Section 230, because the law itself is extremely clear. Passed in 1996, it was designed to solve a problem that plagued web forums in the early years of the internet. According to the prevailing legal doctrine at the time, a site was not liable for content posted by its users; for legal purposes, it qualified as a “distributor,” rather than a “publisher.” Imposing any type of content moderation, however, exposed a site to publisher liability. This created a powerful incentive to allow a free-for-all devoid of even the most minimal standards around things like obscenity, racism, and libel. Section 230 addressed that problem by letting websites keep their immunity and moderate user content as they see fit, “whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.” In other words, the law gives website operators essentially free rein to decide what kind of speech is allowed on their platforms, as long as they’re not using those powers in ways that violate their own terms of service or are otherwise fraudulent. That broad mandate doesn’t leave much room for Trump or the FCC to play around.
The EFF also criticizes the order stating its a violation of the First Amendment; and if the draft order is the same final order which it appears to be, then it won’t survive the courts.
“The good news is that, assuming the final order looks like the draft we reviewed on Wednesday, it won’t survive judicial scrutiny. To see why, let’s take a deeper look at its incorrect reading of Section 230 (47 U.S.C. § 230) and how the order violates the First Amendment,” the EFF wrote.
The provisions regarding the FTC could raise additional legal questions, as the FTC is an independent agency that does not take orders from the President nor has the authority to repeal Section 230, which would have to go through Congress.
Others argue that the order isn’t crazy and it will probably work because it is about intimidation, Insider reported.
Trump does occupy the “bully pulpit,” and he does have the ability to bully the Justice Department, FCC, and Congress, perhaps enough to get them to change how they enforce the law, or even change the law itself. Trump also has the ability to bully the social-media companies. And if Trump has demonstrated anything over the past three years, it is that he is an expert at effective bullying.
Nonetheless, Trump’s administration appears to be ready for that fight and is looking to rescind Section 230 protections.
“One of the things that I found has the broadest bipartisan support these days is the feeling that this provision, Section 230, has been stretched way beyond its original intention, and people feel that on both sides of the aisle,” DOJ head William Barr said.
Just as Barr doesn’t realize what is at stake when it comes to encryption, only seeing the dark side of things. If Section 230 were to be revoked it could harm more than just social media, putting other online businesses like Airbnb, Google, Tripadvisor and many others in the cross hairs as well, Skift reports.
Here’s a video of Trump signing the landmark executive order that will give big government more power than ever over social media. The next step is challenging this executive order in court; because if it passes, this could be the first door opened to more regulation and in turn the beginning of the death of a free and open internet.
**By [@An0nkn0wledge](https://hive.blog/@an0nkn0wledge)**
Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post, where this article first appeared.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-06-01--jew Boy Caught Paying Off and Directing BLM Rioters

Is this one of the “ White supremacists ” inciting the violence who we ’ ve been hearing so much @ @ @ @ @ yet another Bolshevik jew ?

Is this one of the "White supremacists" inciting the violence who we've been hearing so much about? Or is it yet another Bolshevik jew?


renegadetribune--2020-06-01--Holocaust Beliefs Since 1945

Holocaust Beliefs Since 1945

For a half century , all of humanity knew , or thought it knew , that something uniquely cruel took place during WWII , when Germany was fighting nearly every other major country in the world .
Of course , it is true that atrocities were in fact committed during the war — atrocities which were unprecedented in their degree of unique cruelty .
These atrocities were as follows : – The merciless , systematic terror bombing by the Western Allies [ jews ] of German and Japanese cities .
For the first time in the history of the civilized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without pretense to kill or maim the greatest possible number of human beings , including the elderly , women and children , without any military justification , and to destroy as many cultural monuments as possible .
At Dresden , in February 1945 , when the war was all but over , 250,000 ( ++ ) human beings were burned alive or buried under the ruins of their houses in a single night .
In August of the same year , the US dropped the atomic bombs on a Japan which was already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ murder of prisoners of war .
In this unique atrocity , the Allies deliberately allowed enormous numbers of prisoners of war to starve to death or to die of exhaustion .
It is recognized that 1.5 million German prisoners in the USSR died this way .
That the Western democracies cold-bloodedly permitted at least 800,000 , possibly more than a million , prisoners of war to die of hunger , was hushed up in shame for decades , and first came to light through the research of the courageous historian James Bacque ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history , far exceeding anything occurring in past centuries .
Between 1944 and 1949 , approximately 15 million Germans were driven from the homes in which their ancestors had lived peacefully for many generations , and were thrown onto the roads under conditions so inhumane that Europe had not seen the like since the Thirty Years War .
These mass expulsions — unique in their cruelty — caused two million deaths from cold , exhaustion , starvation , and deliberate massacres .
And yet — all these horrors are hardly even noticed when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When people talk of THE unique crime of the century — a crime which staggers the imagination — we immediately sense that we are about to hear — once again — of the German genocide of the jews .
There is only group with victim status : the Six Million There is only one scene of any crime : Auschwitz There is only one group of unique criminals : the “ Nazis ” There is only one new , horrifying weapon : the “ gas chambers ” .
These concepts are deeply anchored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; they are drummed into our brains , on television , radio , and the press almost daily ; they appear in all the history books , at least in the Western world .
These four concepts — Six Million , Auschwitz , “ Nazis , ” and Gas Chambers — are the concrete symbol of Absolute Evil in the minds of all humanity .
And since every decent person must naturally abhor Evil , innumerable numbers of decent people therefore believe themselves morally compelled to hate , or at least to mistrust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ responsible for this unique crime — the German people , who were , at that time , almost 100 % in favour of Hitler and the National Socialist government , a fact which is beyond dispute .
It appears no less logical that the victims of this absolute evil , the jews , should , by the same logic , be treated with the greatest possible sympathy and respect .
Of course , this includes the decency of refraining from asking for any proof of their unspeakable suffering — these people who are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have suffered so unspeakably .
Every decent human being must listen with the greatest solemnity , the profoundest grief , and without the slightest questioning , to all the details of the monstrous tale of the assembly-line extermination of an entire people , then cry out in righteous indignation : Never Again !
This assembly-line style extermination of human beings is commonly known as the “ Holocaust ” , from the Greek word for “ sacrifice by fire ” ( holos = entirely ; kaein = to burn ) .
Another term , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which is preferred by jews , is “ Shoa ” ( Hebrew for “ catastrophe ” ) .
The terms “ Holocaust ” and “ Shoa ” are an indictment of the German people and its ruling government from 1933 to 1945 , an indictment which , in terms of severity , has never been made against any other people or government at any time in history .
This indictment runs as follows : In the midst of the 20th century , in the heart of Europe , the Germans , over a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ autumn of 1941 until the autumn of 1944 ) , murdered five to six million jewish men , women , and children , almost unnoticed by the world .
This genocide is said to have been carried out based on a diabolical plan , carefully hatched by the NS government .
The majority of the victims — from slightly less than three million to more than five million , depending on which historian you believe — were killed with a previously unknown weapon , i.e.
, gas chambers ( with gas vans playing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are supposed to have taken place in six extermination camps located on Polish territory , namely Auschwitz , Majdanek , Sobibor , Treblinka , and Chelmno .
The last mentioned camp used gas vans ; the five others used stationary gas chambers .
Some of the bodies were burned in crematoria , and some in the open , leaving not a rack behind .
The Germans also liquidated between one and two million jews in Russia , some of them in gas vans , some by mass shooting .
These massacres were committed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ Einsatzgruppen ” .
After that come another half million or more jews who are said to have died in ghettos and work camps from mistreatment , malnutrition , and exhaustion .
These are , of course , included among the number of jewish victims , almost Six Million — ( three to five million or more gassed in the six death camps , plus one to two million shot in Russia or murdered in gas vans ; plus at least half a million more , from more or less “ natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not the result of a deliberate policy of extermination ; non-jewish prisoners also died in great numbers for the same reasons .
Although these jews can not really be included as “ Holocaust victims ” , they are included among them for the sake of simplicity .
Morally , according to half a century of deafening media propaganda , the Holocaust can not be equated with any other atrocity in history .
Stalin may have killed tens of millions more than Hitler , but he never ordered an entire race wiped out without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individual cases .
The Germans didn ’ t commit the Holocaust because they considered the jews a real or potential threat , but solely and merely because the victims were jews .
The Germans , according to their accusers , exterminated an entire people out of pure RACIAL HATRED .
This racial hatred was the reason why they killed not just the men , the fighting-fit , but the elderly , women and children , including the newborn — everyone who could be called a “ jew ” .
Compared to the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nazi ’ crimes ” pale into insignificance !
In addition to the genocide of the jews , the Third Reich is accused of other gigantic crimes .
For example , the claim is sometimes made in the media that the National Socialists killed three million non-jewish Poles .
The unprejudiced observer will perhaps wonder as to the circumstances under which so many Poles are said to have been killed .
Between the end of the short German-Polish war of September 1939 and the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto of 1944 , which cost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course , attacks by the Resistance resulting in German reprisals , but there was no large-scale conflict .
There is no allegation of any mass-extermination of non-jewish Poles in the camps .
How are the three million Poles supposed to have been killed ?
No Western historian has ever made a serious attempt to establish the figure .
25 Claims of the alleged 500,000 gypsies exterminated by the Germans are heard with incomparably greater frequency than the claims of the three million non-jewish Poles .
With regards to the extermination of the gypsies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ praised to the skies by the media , states as follows : “ After 1941 , the gypsies in the occupied territories were exterminated just as systematically as the jews who lived there .
This mass murder has… hardly ever been researched in detail since that time .
People didn ’ t talk about it when it was going on ; even today , people don ’ t know much about it , except that it took place .
Documents are rare .
Estimates of the number of victims range up to 500,000.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ genocide of the gypsies has hardly been ever researched and the documents are “ rare ” ( i.e.
, there aren ’ t any ) , but we still know that the extermination took place !
That this slaughter is the purest fantasy , has been proven by Udo Walendy in great detail .
The edition of Walendy ’ s periodical Historische Tatsachen which discussed this topic was prohibited , although the authorities could not point to a single sentence in it which was not true .
The alleged genocide of the gypsies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deeply as the jewish Holocaust .
In monuments to the “ Nazi ” victims , the “ Sinti und Roma ” — the politically correct expression for the gypsies — appear as “ also rans ” at best .
The gypsies themselves , of course , make energetic attempts to obtain compensation from Bonn , but the sums obtained thus far have been monetarily insignificant ; this is doubtlessly due to the general lack of political and economic clout possessed by gypsies .
In early 1997 , the historical researchers threw in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ February 1997 ( p. 7 ) , in particular , reports , with reference to the historian Michael Zimmerman : “ Only after a thorough study of the documents was it discovered that the number of murdered Sinti und Roma was significantly lower than the figure current in the media : 50,000 instead of 500,000.
” Please don ’ t get the idea that the figure of 500,000 exterminated gypsies was invented and peddled by lie-historians , lie-politicians , and the lie-media for fifty years , without the slightest proof ; instead , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spontaneous generation , after which it merely became “ current in the media ” !
Regardless of this admission from the historians themselves , the mythical 500,000 murdered gypsies will no doubt continue to stalk the pages of the tabloids of the future as they did in the past — like ghosts .
( That the new figure of 50,000 murdered Sinti and Roma announced by “ historical researchers ” lacks even the slightest trace of proof , goes without saying . )
That there were medical experiments in the NS concentration camps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not our intention to justify them .
But the Eastern and Western conquerors of Germany have not the slightest right to become indignant about the matter , because they who live in glass houses should not throw stones .
As shown in detail in the French newspaper Nouvelle Vision , the Soviets as well as the Americans also carried out medical experiments on human beings , to an incomparably greater degree than the National Socialists .
The following are only three examples : – In Kazakhstan in the USSR , the Soviets set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 800 villages were affected by the radioactive fallout .
In many cases , the villagers were forbidden to enter their houses at the time of the blast , allegedly due to the danger of collapsing buildings ; in reality , this order was given to test the effects of radioactivity on the victims .
According to the Ministry of Health of Kazakhstan , the life expectancy in the affected areas is now 15 years lower than the national average ; – Radioactive experiments were carried out on human beings in the USA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US authorities admitted that , in Tennessee in the 1940s , 700 pregnant women were prescribed radioactive pills , exposing the fetus to radioactive radiation .
Many children born to mothers involved in these experiments died prematurely of cancer .
Other radioactive experiments on human beings were performed in Oregon in 1963 ; – In 1954 , the first oral contraceptive developed in the USA was not tested on American women , but on Puerto Ricans instead .
Since animal experimentation had already proven the pill ’ s carcinogenic effects , researchers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the women involved , and therefore chose foreigners as test subjects .
Many more examples could be cited .
Between 50,000 and 100,000 severely ill patients were killed in Germany after the autumn of 1939 in the context of the euthanasia programme permitting the killing of physically and psychically incurably ill .
The euthanasia programme was stopped as the result of protests from the Catholic Bishop Galen and the Evangelical Bishop Wurm .
Opinion differs as to the justification for euthanasia .
Strict christians — particularly , Fundamentalists — reject it on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ considered holy and sacrosanct .
Other well-meaning people advocate euthanasia on the grounds that incurably ill patients can only suffer , constituting a burden to themselves and their loved ones , and that such a life is unworthy of human beings , a life no longer worth living .
We do not wish to take a position on the matter , but we wish to point out the following : – Hundreds of thousands of healthy children are aborted on “ social grounds ” in the “ democracies ” every year , i.e.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s womb , either chopped to bits or killed with corrosive solutions or acids .
Is this any more humane than the painless killing of much smaller numbers of the incurably ill in the Third Reich ?
– Both passive euthanasia ( failing to take measures to prolong life ) and active euthanasia ( killing the sick ) are gaining increasingly greater numbers of adherents every day .
The world ’ s best known advocate of euthanasia is the “ Australian ” jew , Singer .
Particularly to the forefront in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antifascist ” country in the world : Holland .
To sum up : the criticisms made above are insufficient to justify any criminalization of the National Socialist system , not to mention the German people as a whole .
Nor do the murder of the “ three million non-jewish Poles ” and the “ 500,000 gypsies ” suffice either , because these huge massacres are pure products of the imagination .
“ Medical experiments on human beings ” are insufficient , since the Soviets and Americans carried out similar practices on a much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because it is officially tolerated in several European countries today — not to mention the fact that it is surely much less heinous than aborting millions of healthy children , even if we consider euthanasia a crime .
Claude Lanzmann , producer of the nine-and-one-half hour film Shoa , has made the following incredibly revealing statement : “ If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history , if it goes beyond the ‘ banality of evil ’ , then Christianity totters on its foundations .
Christ is the Son of God @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the humanly endurable , where he endured the cruelest suffering… If Auschwitz is true , then there is a human suffering which simply can not be compared with that of Christ… In this case , Christ is false , and salvation will not come from Him… If the pain of Auschwitz is much more extreme than that of the Apocalypse , much more horrifying than that described by John in the Apocalypse ( since the Apocalypse can be described as , and even resembles , a huge , Hollywood-style spectacular , while Auschwitz @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Book of the Apocalypse is false , and the Gospels are false , too .
Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ.
” One could hardly provide a more drastic demonstration that , for increasingly greater numbers of jews , the Holocaust has become a genuine religion .
Perhaps two jews out of three jews believe in God , but 99.9 % of them believe in the gas chambers .
If this murky religion were restricted to jews , that would be their own affair ; basically , it would be their problem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasingly shameless attempts have been made in recent years to force this jewish Holocaust religion upon non-jews by criminal law .
If “ Auschwitz ” is true , salvation will not come from Christ , says Lanzmann — so where is it going to come from , then ?
Quite obviously from the jews , who have now been transubstantiated into a sort of collective Messiah because of Auschwitz !
The 28 arch-enemy of the new collective Messiah is therefore the “ National Socialist regime of the gas chambers and the Holocaust ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The ever-growing numbers of Holocaust memorials are quite obviously part of this religious — or rather pseudo-religious — framework .
“ Doubting the Holocaust ” ( the official version of the Holocaust , that is ) has , in the meantime , been made punishable by criminal prosecution in several countries , so that the picture is now complete : as a religious dogma , the Holocaust must remain exempt from all scientific research and be taken on faith ( or else ) .
The Swiss writer Arthur Vogt has described the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ First principle of faith : the Germans , as a race of criminals , have been cursed with eternal shame… Even their descendants bear the mark of Cain , merely because they are German… Second principle : There is only one salvation from this terrible guilt , and that is : constant acknowledgement and remorse for the crime .
That is the reason for all the memorials and anniversaries… The Holocaust religion recognizes good works : this is why the German government must support the construction of Israel with billions of marks in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is performed by young Germans — for example , through the activities of the ‘ Symbol of Reconciliation ’ — through taking care of the elderly in Israel or rebuilding crumbling walls at Auschwitz .
“ So much money and effort have been invested in the Holocaust religion , and continue to be invested in it , that if the factual basis for it were found to be erroneous , it would be an incredible shock .
Yet it is the basis of the founding myth of Israel ( and the BRD ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ element in the identity of the jews today , both believers and non-believers .
To point out the existence of contradictions and errors in the so-called “ evidence ” is heresy… The Holocaust religion also has its heretics , whom it persecutes mercilessly .
These are the revisionists , who dare to question the established version of history .
They are slandered and persecuted all over the world , under the influence of powerful Zionist groups.
” Why nearly everybody believes in the Holocaust No doubt the overwhelming majority of human beings , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe in the official version of the Holocaust for reasons which at first glance appear entirely plausible : First , it seems entirely inconceivable that the media as a whole would be able to spread a story like that for over 50 years unless there was some truth in the story , at least very generally .
The average citizen , of course , can still imagine that the numbers of victims may have been exaggerated ; but the notion that the gas chamber story , taken as a whole , could be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far too monstrous to consider .
In addition , the correctness of the official version of the Holocaust appears confirmed by three factors : – the general disappearance of the jews from several former German-ruled countries , particularly Poland , where three million jews are acknowledged to have lived in the early 1930s , but where only a few tens of thousands live today , according to official statistics .
So if they weren ’ t exterminated , is the question , where did they go ?
We will only examine the demographic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of our study ; for the moment , we will consider only one single argument in reply : at the end of WWII , there were approximately 12 million Germans in the areas east of the Oder and Neisse .
There are only between one and two million there today .
Does that really mean that 10 to 11 million Germans in the Eastern territories were exterminated ?
Of course , the answer is no ; some of them died during the violence of the expulsion , of course , but most of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the war .
According to this logic , then , the general disappearance of “ Polish ” jewry is no proof that most of the jews in these territories were exterminated .
They could have escaped or emigrated .
– The alleged “ innumerable eyewitness testimonies ” .
“ It may well be ” , people cry in profound indignation , “ that a few witnesses may have lied or exaggerated the horrors of the Holocaust , but all of them ?
It ’ s unthinkable !
” This argument is based upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ witnesses to the extermination of the jews in the gas chambers than is commonly assumed .
Anyone who consults the standard literature will soon note that , basically , only a handful of witnesses are quoted : Gerstein , Höss , Broad , Vrba , Mueller , Bendel , Lengyel , Tauber , Nyiszli , and a few more .
Since there are no forensic or documentary proofs for the mass killings in the gas chambers — as we shall soon show in detail — the entire Holocaust allegation basically stands or falls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ standard eyewitnesses .
The great majority of the alleged “ innumerable witnesses ” only heard of the gas chambers second or third hand ; – The photos and films .
It is quite true that there are authentic photographs of piles of corpses and living skeletons from German concentration camps ; these photographs were taken after their liberation by Allied troops .
But they are no proof of any systematic “ extermination of the jews ” , since even the official version of the story does not dispute the fact that these dead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ starvation and epidemic disease during the chaotic last few months of the war .
In addition to these authentic photos , there are a number of grossly falsified photos , which have been distributed widely for decades .
Udo Walendy has helped prove their inauthenticity .
These manipulations in themselves , of course , are insufficient to prove that “ there wasn ’ t any Holocaust ” ; but they should awaken our suspicion .
Why must one have recourse to such primitive trickery if great quantities of unimpeachable evidence are available ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ myself in the movies and on television ” can only be the product of a very feeble mind .
All the films of the genocide of the jews , from Holocaust to Shoa to Schindler ’ s List , were produced long after the war ; that they lack any probative value is a matter of course .
It ’ s no accident that a miserable botch job like Schindler ’ s List was cooked up in black-and-white .
This was done to create a false impression of authenticity for historically naive cinema-goers @

By Jürgen Graf
Published 1997
For a half century, all of humanity knew, or thought it knew, that something uniquely cruel took place during WWII, when Germany was fighting nearly every other major country in the world.
Of course, it is true that atrocities were in fact committed during the war — atrocities which were unprecedented in their degree of unique cruelty. These atrocities were as follows:
– The merciless, systematic terror bombing by the Western Allies [jews] of German and Japanese cities. For the first time in the history of the civilized world, a belligerent sought openly and without pretense to kill or maim the greatest possible number of human beings, including the elderly, women and children, without any military justification, and to destroy as many cultural monuments as possible. At Dresden, in February 1945, when the war was all but over, 250,000(++) human beings were burned alive or buried under the ruins of their houses in a single night. In August of the same year, the US dropped the atomic bombs on a Japan which was already prepared to capitulate;
– The mass murder of prisoners of war. In this unique atrocity, the Allies deliberately allowed enormous numbers of prisoners of war to starve to death or to die of exhaustion. It is recognized that 1.5 million German prisoners in the USSR died this way. That the Western democracies cold-bloodedly permitted at least 800,000, possibly more than a million, prisoners of war to die of hunger, was hushed up in shame for decades, and first came to light through the research of the courageous historian James Bacque;
– The greatest mass expulsion in human history, far exceeding anything occurring in past centuries. Between 1944 and 1949, approximately 15 million Germans were driven from the homes in which their ancestors had lived peacefully for many generations, and were thrown onto the roads under conditions so inhumane that Europe had not seen the like since the Thirty Years War. These mass expulsions — unique in their cruelty — caused two million deaths from cold, exhaustion, starvation, and deliberate massacres.
And yet — all these horrors are hardly even noticed when there is talk of WWII atrocities. When people talk of THE unique crime of the century — a crime which staggers the imagination — we immediately sense that we are about to hear — once again — of the German genocide of the jews.
There is only group with victim status: the Six Million
There is only one scene of any crime: Auschwitz
There is only one group of unique criminals: the “Nazis”
There is only one new, horrifying weapon: the “gas chambers”.
These concepts are deeply anchored in the sub-consciousness of all of humanity; they are drummed into our brains, on television, radio, and the press almost daily; they appear in all the history books, at least in the Western world.
These four concepts — Six Million, Auschwitz, “Nazis,” and Gas Chambers — are the concrete symbol of Absolute Evil in the minds of all humanity. And since every decent person must naturally abhor Evil, innumerable numbers of decent people therefore believe themselves morally compelled to hate, or at least to mistrust, the nationality of people who were responsible for this unique crime — the German people, who were, at that time, almost 100% in favour of Hitler and the National Socialist government, a fact which is beyond dispute.
It appears no less logical that the victims of this absolute evil, the jews, should, by the same logic, be treated with the greatest possible sympathy and respect. Of course, this includes the decency of refraining from asking for any proof of their unspeakable suffering — these people who are so deserving of our sympathy, who have suffered so unspeakably. Every decent human being must listen with the greatest solemnity, the profoundest grief, and without the slightest questioning, to all the details of the monstrous tale of the assembly-line extermination of an entire people, then cry out in righteous indignation: Never Again!
This assembly-line style extermination of human beings is commonly known as the “Holocaust”, from the Greek word for “sacrifice by fire” (holos = entirely; kaein = to burn). Another term, which is less commonly used, but which is preferred by jews, is “Shoa” (Hebrew for “catastrophe”).
The terms “Holocaust” and “Shoa” are an indictment of the German people and its ruling government from 1933 to 1945, an indictment which, in terms of severity, has never been made against any other people or government at any time in history.
This indictment runs as follows:
In the midst of the 20th century, in the heart of Europe, the Germans, over a period of three years (from the autumn of 1941 until the autumn of 1944), murdered five to six million jewish men, women, and children, almost unnoticed by the world. This genocide is said to have been carried out based on a diabolical plan, carefully hatched by the NS government. The majority of the victims — from slightly less than three million to more than five million, depending on which historian you believe — were killed with a previously unknown weapon, i.e., gas chambers (with gas vans playing second fiddle). These mass murders are supposed to have taken place in six extermination camps located on Polish territory, namely Auschwitz, Majdanek, Sobibor, Treblinka, and Chelmno. The last mentioned camp used gas vans; the five others used stationary gas chambers. Some of the bodies were burned in crematoria, and some in the open, leaving not a rack behind.
The Germans also liquidated between one and two million jews in Russia, some of them in gas vans, some by mass shooting. These massacres were committed mostly by a special murder squad, the “Einsatzgruppen”.
After that come another half million or more jews who are said to have died in ghettos and work camps from mistreatment, malnutrition, and exhaustion. These are, of course, included among the number of jewish victims, almost Six Million — (three to five million or more gassed in the six death camps, plus one to two million shot in Russia or murdered in gas vans; plus at least half a million more, from more or less “natural causes”) — but who were not the result of a deliberate policy of extermination; non-jewish prisoners also died in great numbers for the same reasons. Although these jews cannot really be included as “Holocaust victims”, they are included among them for the sake of simplicity.
Morally, according to half a century of deafening media propaganda, the Holocaust cannot be equated with any other atrocity in history. Stalin may have killed tens of millions more than Hitler, but he never ordered an entire race wiped out without a trace, without any examination of individual cases. The Germans didn’t commit the Holocaust because they considered the jews a real or potential threat, but solely and merely because the victims were jews. The Germans, according to their accusers, exterminated an entire people out of pure RACIAL HATRED. This racial hatred was the reason why they killed not just the men, the fighting-fit, but the elderly, women and children, including the newborn — everyone who could be called a “jew”.
Compared to the “Holocaust”, all other “’Nazi’ crimes” pale into insignificance!
a) “The three million non-jewish Poles”
In addition to the genocide of the jews, the Third Reich is accused of other gigantic crimes.
For example, the claim is sometimes made in the media that the National Socialists killed three million non-jewish Poles. The unprejudiced observer will perhaps wonder as to the circumstances under which so many Poles are said to have been killed. Between the end of the short German-Polish war of September 1939 and the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto of 1944, which cost 180,000 victims, there were, of course, attacks by the Resistance resulting in German reprisals, but there was no large-scale conflict. There is no allegation of any mass-extermination of non-jewish Poles in the camps. How are the three million Poles supposed to have been killed? No Western historian has ever made a serious attempt to establish the figure. 25
b) “The 500,000 gypsies”
Claims of the alleged 500,000 gypsies exterminated by the Germans are heard with incomparably greater frequency than the claims of the three million non-jewish Poles. With regards to the extermination of the gypsies, Sebastien Haffner, in a book praised to the skies by the media, states as follows:
“After 1941, the gypsies in the occupied territories were exterminated just as systematically as the jews who lived there. This mass murder has… hardly ever been researched in detail since that time. People didn’t talk about it when it was going on; even today, people don’t know much about it, except that it took place. Documents are rare. Estimates of the number of victims range up to 500,000.”
According to the above, the genocide of the gypsies has hardly been ever researched and the documents are “rare” (i.e., there aren’t any), but we still know that the extermination took place!
That this slaughter is the purest fantasy, has been proven by Udo Walendy in great detail. The edition of Walendy’s periodical Historische Tatsachen which discussed this topic was prohibited, although the authorities could not point to a single sentence in it which was not true.
The alleged genocide of the gypsies has not penetrated the public consciousness as deeply as the jewish Holocaust. In monuments to the “Nazi” victims, the “Sinti und Roma” — the politically correct expression for the gypsies — appear as “also rans” at best. The gypsies themselves, of course, make energetic attempts to obtain compensation from Bonn, but the sums obtained thus far have been monetarily insignificant; this is doubtlessly due to the general lack of political and economic clout possessed by gypsies.
In early 1997, the historical researchers threw in the towel. The Frankfurter Rundschau of 13 February 1997 (p. 7), in particular, reports, with reference to the historian Michael Zimmerman:
“Only after a thorough study of the documents was it discovered that the number of murdered Sinti und Roma was significantly lower than the figure current in the media: 50,000 instead of 500,000.”
Please don’t get the idea that the figure of 500,000 exterminated gypsies was invented and peddled by lie-historians, lie-politicians, and the lie-media for fifty years, without the slightest proof; instead, it arose spontaneously, a product of spontaneous generation, after which it merely became “current in the media”! Regardless of this admission from the historians themselves, the mythical 500,000 murdered gypsies will no doubt continue to stalk the pages of the tabloids of the future as they did in the past — like ghosts. (That the new figure of 50,000 murdered Sinti and Roma announced by “historical researchers” lacks even the slightest trace of proof, goes without saying.)
c) Medical experiments on human beings
That there were medical experiments in the NS concentration camps, is undisputed, and it is not our intention to justify them. But the Eastern and Western conquerors of Germany have not the slightest right to become indignant about the matter, because they who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
As shown in detail in the French newspaper Nouvelle Vision, the Soviets as well as the Americans also carried out medical experiments on human beings, to an incomparably greater degree than the National Socialists. The following are only three examples:
– In Kazakhstan in the USSR , the Soviets set off 446 atomic bombs. A total of 800 villages were affected by the radioactive fallout. In many cases, the villagers were forbidden to enter their houses at the time of the blast, allegedly due to the danger of collapsing buildings; in reality, this order was given to test the effects of radioactivity on the victims. According to the Ministry of Health of Kazakhstan, the life expectancy in the affected areas is now 15 years lower than the national average;
– Radioactive experiments were carried out on human beings in the USA as well. In December 1993, the US authorities admitted that, in Tennessee in the 1940s, 700 pregnant women were prescribed radioactive pills, exposing the fetus to radioactive radiation. Many children born to mothers involved in these experiments died prematurely of cancer. Other radioactive experiments on human beings were performed in Oregon in 1963;
– In 1954, the first oral contraceptive developed in the USA was not tested on American women, but on Puerto Ricans instead. Since animal experimentation had already proven the pill’s carcinogenic effects, researchers were well aware of the dangers to the women involved, and therefore chose foreigners as test subjects.
Many more examples could be cited.
d) Euthanasia
Between 50,000 and 100,000 severely ill patients were killed in Germany after the autumn of 1939 in the context of the euthanasia programme permitting the killing of physically and psychically incurably ill. The euthanasia programme was stopped as the result of protests from the Catholic Bishop Galen and the Evangelical Bishop Wurm.
Opinion differs as to the justification for euthanasia. Strict christians — particularly, Fundamentalists — reject it on the grounds that human life is to be considered holy and sacrosanct. Other well-meaning people advocate euthanasia on the grounds that incurably ill patients can only suffer, constituting a burden to themselves and their loved ones, and that such a life is unworthy of human beings, a life no longer worth living. We do not wish to take a position on the matter, but we wish to point out the following:
– Hundreds of thousands of healthy children are aborted on “social grounds” in the “democracies” every year, i.e., they are killed in their mother’s womb, either chopped to bits or killed with corrosive solutions or acids. Is this any more humane than the painless killing of much smaller numbers of the incurably ill in the Third Reich?
– Both passive euthanasia (failing to take measures to prolong life) and active euthanasia (killing the sick) are gaining increasingly greater numbers of adherents every day. The world’s best known advocate of euthanasia is the “Australian” jew, Singer. Particularly to the forefront in the legalization of euthanasia is the most “antifascist” country in the world: Holland.
To sum up: the criticisms made above are insufficient to justify any criminalization of the National Socialist system, not to mention the German people as a whole. Nor do the murder of the “three million non-jewish Poles” and the “500,000 gypsies” suffice either, because these huge massacres are pure products of the imagination. “Medical experiments on human beings” are insufficient, since the Soviets and Americans carried out similar practices on a much larger scale. Euthanasia is insufficient, because it is officially tolerated in several European countries today — not to mention the fact that it is surely much less heinous than aborting millions of healthy children, even if we consider euthanasia a crime.
The Holocaust as a religion
Claude Lanzmann, producer of the nine-and-one-half hour film Shoa, has made the following incredibly revealing statement :
“If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, if it goes beyond the ‘banality of evil’, then Christianity totters on its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who went to the end of the humanly endurable, where he endured the cruelest suffering… If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human suffering which simply cannot be compared with that of Christ… In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from Him… If the pain of Auschwitz is much more extreme than that of the Apocalypse, much more horrifying than that described by John in the Apocalypse (since the Apocalypse can be described as, and even resembles, a huge, Hollywood-style spectacular, while Auschwitz is inexpressible and undescribable), then the Book of the Apocalypse is false, and the Gospels are false, too. Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ.”
One could hardly provide a more drastic demonstration that, for increasingly greater numbers of jews, the Holocaust has become a genuine religion. Perhaps two jews out of three jews believe in God, but 99.9% of them believe in the gas chambers. If this murky religion were restricted to jews, that would be their own affair; basically, it would be their problem, not ours; yet ominously, increasingly shameless attempts have been made in recent years to force this jewish Holocaust religion upon non-jews by criminal law.
If “Auschwitz” is true, salvation will not come from Christ, says Lanzmann — so where is it going to come from, then? Quite obviously from the jews, who have now been transubstantiated into a sort of collective Messiah because of Auschwitz! The 28 arch-enemy of the new collective Messiah is therefore the “National Socialist regime of the gas chambers and the Holocaust” — the incorporation of Absolute Evil.
The ever-growing numbers of Holocaust memorials are quite obviously part of this religious — or rather pseudo-religious — framework. “Doubting the Holocaust” (the official version of the Holocaust, that is) has, in the meantime, been made punishable by criminal prosecution in several countries, so that the picture is now complete: as a religious dogma, the Holocaust must remain exempt from all scientific research and be taken on faith (or else).
The Swiss writer Arthur Vogt has described the “Holocaust religion” very perceptively:
“First principle of faith: the Germans, as a race of criminals, have been cursed with eternal shame… Even their descendants bear the mark of Cain, merely because they are German… Second principle: There is only one salvation from this terrible guilt, and that is: constant acknowledgement and remorse for the crime. That is the reason for all the memorials and anniversaries… The Holocaust religion recognizes good works: this is why the German government must support the construction of Israel with billions of marks in so-called ‘reparations’. Personal atonement is performed by young Germans — for example, through the activities of the ‘Symbol of Reconciliation’ — through taking care of the elderly in Israel or rebuilding crumbling walls at Auschwitz.
“So much money and effort have been invested in the Holocaust religion, and continue to be invested in it, that if the factual basis for it were found to be erroneous, it would be an incredible shock. Yet it is the basis of the founding myth of Israel (and the BRD); it is the most important founding element in the identity of the jews today, both believers and non-believers. To point out the existence of contradictions and errors in the so-called “evidence” is heresy… The Holocaust religion also has its heretics, whom it persecutes mercilessly. These are the revisionists, who dare to question the established version of history. They are slandered and persecuted all over the world, under the influence of powerful Zionist groups.”
Why nearly everybody believes in the Holocaust
No doubt the overwhelming majority of human beings, at least in the Western states, believe in the official version of the Holocaust for reasons which at first glance appear entirely plausible:
First, it seems entirely inconceivable that the media as a whole would be able to spread a story like that for over 50 years unless there was some truth in the story, at least very generally. The average citizen, of course, can still imagine that the numbers of victims may have been exaggerated; but the notion that the gas chamber story, taken as a whole, could be purely a product of fantasy, is far too monstrous to consider. In addition, the correctness of the official version of the Holocaust appears confirmed by three factors:
– the general disappearance of the jews from several former German-ruled countries, particularly Poland, where three million jews are acknowledged to have lived in the early 1930s, but where only a few tens of thousands live today, according to official statistics. So if they weren’t exterminated, is the question, where did they go?
We will only examine the demographic aspect of the question at the end of our study; for the moment, we will consider only one single argument in reply: at the end of WWII, there were approximately 12 million Germans in the areas east of the Oder and Neisse. There are only between one and two million there today. Does that really mean that 10 to 11 million Germans in the Eastern territories were exterminated? Of course, the answer is no; some of them died during the violence of the expulsion, of course, but most of them escaped to the West and survived the war. According to this logic, then, the general disappearance of “Polish” jewry is no proof that most of the jews in these territories were exterminated. They could have escaped or emigrated.
– The alleged “innumerable eyewitness testimonies”. “It may well be”, people cry in profound indignation, “that a few witnesses may have lied or exaggerated the horrors of the Holocaust, but all of them? It’s unthinkable!” This argument is based upon a misunderstanding. There are far fewer witnesses to the extermination of the jews in the gas chambers than is commonly assumed. Anyone who consults the standard literature will soon note that, basically, only a handful of witnesses are quoted: Gerstein, Höss, Broad, Vrba, Mueller, Bendel, Lengyel, Tauber, Nyiszli, and a few more. Since there are no forensic or documentary proofs for the mass killings in the gas chambers — as we shall soon show in detail — the entire Holocaust allegation basically stands or falls with the testimony of perhaps two dozen standard eyewitnesses. The great majority of the alleged “innumerable witnesses” only heard of the gas chambers second or third hand;
– The photos and films. It is quite true that there are authentic photographs of piles of corpses and living skeletons from German concentration camps; these photographs were taken after their liberation by Allied troops. But they are no proof of any systematic “extermination of the jews”, since even the official version of the story does not dispute the fact that these dead and dying men were the victims of starvation and epidemic disease during the chaotic last few months of the war.
In addition to these authentic photos, there are a number of grossly falsified photos, which have been distributed widely for decades. Udo Walendy has helped prove their inauthenticity.
These manipulations in themselves, of course, are insufficient to prove that “there wasn’t any Holocaust”; but they should awaken our suspicion. Why must one have recourse to such primitive trickery if great quantities of unimpeachable evidence are available?
The argument “But I saw it myself in the movies and on television” can only be the product of a very feeble mind. All the films of the genocide of the jews, from Holocaust to Shoa to Schindler’s List, were produced long after the war; that they lack any probative value is a matter of course. It’s no accident that a miserable botch job like Schindler’s List was cooked up in black-and-white. This was done to create a false impression of authenticity for historically naive cinema-goers.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-06-01--Vermeer: Master of Light

Vermeer: Master of Light

Thanks for being a reader of this site .
Your contributions make this all possible .
You can send support @ @ @ @ @ PO Box 1052 , Sorrento FL 32776 .
Bitcoin address : 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt