renegadetribune--2020-07-05--The Thin Internal Walls of Krematorium I at Auschwitz

The Thin Internal Walls of Krematorium I at Auschwitz The room inside the old crematorium of the Auschwitz Main Camp that was a morgue according to original war-time plans is said to have been used as a homicidal gas chamber between late 1941/early 1942 and the first half of 1943 .
It would seem that operating a homicidal gas chamber requires the installation of gas-tight , panic-proof doors to keep both the poisonous fumes and the victims safely inside .
While there is no evidence in the extant documentation pointing to the existence of any such doors , orthodox historiography @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doors were in fact in place .
A closer scrutiny of war-time blueprints reveals that the walls of this morgue which must have supported these doors were extremely thin , hence unable to support the installation of massive steel doors .
The Impetus of this Paper On November 20,2019 , I received the following email : “ Hello , my name is Federico Bussone , I ’ m from Italy .
I think I have discovered an important weak point in the mainstream official story of the Auschwitz Main Camp crematorium .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ point has never been highlighted by any revisionist , and so I would like to share with you my ‘ discovery.
’ We have to look at the original blueprint of the Crematorium I of April 10 1942 ( but also the one from November 30 1940 ) .
In both these plans , the wall of the left ( short ) side of the alleged gas chamber , that is , the wall with the entrance door , is REALLY THIN , it probably measures no more than 15 centimetres .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such a partition could only have served as a dividing wall .
It could have never withstand the stresses produced by the opening and closing of a heavy steel door .
Let alone the blows and the pressure towards the outside exerted by the panicked prisoners .
I would like to emphasize that this type of wall , built of small solid bricks bound by mortar , became quite resistant only when built in a double row .
In a single row , as it is in our case , it can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a single worker , for example during house renovation .
It seems to me that this important fact has not been grasped so far .
For example , the 3D models by Eric Hunt have the same ( greater ) thickness for all walls .
The same for other drawings I have found in revisionist publications etc .
I hope this mail will be helpful !
After the former Polish military barracks south of the Polish city of Oswiecim had been converted into a concentration camp by German authorities following the Polish defeat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bunker on the grounds of that camp was converted into a crematorium for the incineration of the remains of deceased or executed inmates .
In war-time and post-war literature , this building is alternately referred to as either the old crematorium or Crematorium I .
The morgue of this facility is said to have been converted into a homicidal gas chamber subsequent to an initial test gassing conducted in the camp ’ s gaol in September of 1941 .
This was asserted already two months prior to the end of World War Two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which stated the following about this in its report : “ In early 1941 , a crematorium , designated as Crematorium # 1 , was started up in the Auschwitz camp .
[ … ] Next to this crematorium there was a gas chamber , which had , at either end , gas-tight doors with peep-holes and in the ceiling four openings with hermetic closures through which the ‘ Zyklon ’ for the killing of the persons was thrown .
Crematorium I operated until March 1943 and existed in that form for two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Polish show trial against former Auschwitz camp commandant Rudolf Höss , Polish engineer Dr. Roman Dawidowski compiled an expert report on evidence supporting homicidal gassing claims at Auschwitz , where we read on this topic : “ One now [ in late 1941 ] began to poison people regularly with Zyklon B and to use for that purpose the Leichenhalle ( morgue ) of Crematorium I [ … ] .
This chamber [ … ] on both sides had a gas-tight door.
” Jan Sehn , the Polish judge who led the investigation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trials against former members of the German Auschwitz camp staff , wrote the following about this in his 1960 book on Auschwitz : “ The mortuary ( Leichenkeller ) of the first Oswiecim crematorium [ … ] was fitted with two gas-proof doors.
” Claims about gas-tight doors in that morgue originate from witness testimony .
Among them is Stanisław Jankowski , who stated regarding the doors in that room in a deposition October 3 , 1980 : “ The two thick wooden doors of the room , one in the side wall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , had been made gas-tight.
” The post-war autobiography by Rudolf Höss , written while in Polish custody awaiting his execution , contains little information about the doors of this alleged gas chamber , only that they must have been very sturdy , because : “ When the powder [ sic ; Zyklon B ] was thrown in [ to the gas chamber ] , there were cries of ‘ Gas !
’ , then a great bellowing , and the trapped prisoners [ Russian PoWs to be gassed ] hurled themselves against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ held.
” Höss moreover speaks repeatedly of the doors being “ screwed ” shut , which points to a door with massive steel fixtures not found on usual doors .
In his post-war declaration writing in the summer of 1945 , former SS man Pery Broad was a little more specific about the doors of this claimed homicidal gas chamber , making it clear that this was a heavy , gas-tight , panic-proof door : “ Suddenly the door was closed .
It had been made tight with rubber and secured with iron @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bolts being secured .
They were screwed to with screws , making the door air-tight .
A deadly , paralysing terror spread among the victims .
They started to beat upon the door , in helpless rage and despair they hammered with their fists upon it.
” While interrogated in preparation of the first Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial , defendant Hans Stark made the following statements in his deposition about the doors of that room : “ As early as the autumn of 1941 gassings were carried out in a room of the small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for that purpose .
It could take in some 200–250 people , was higher than a normal living room , had no windows , and only one door that had been made [ gas ] tight and had a lock like the door of an air-raid shelter.
” In the fall of 1944 , the section of the old crematorium that contained the morgue , the washroom and the laying-out/dissecting room was converted into an air-raid shelter for the SS .
For this purpose , the former interior walls of that section as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the furnace room were changed – I will address this in more detail later – and probably also the doors , as documentation indicates that the shelter ’ s interior doors were of a “ simple ” nature , hence neither gas-tight nor fragment-proof , as was initially foreseen , nor panic-proof , as would have been required for homicidal purposes .
Illustration 1 : Sign posted outside the old crematorium at the former Auschwitz Main Camp juxtaposing the situation before the building ’ s conversion to an air-raid shelter ( left ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In 1947 , the freshly established Polish Auschwitz-Museum authorities restructured the building , among other things by removing some of the former air-raid shelter ’ s internal walls .
By so doing they tried to recreate the state as it was before the conversion of this facility to an air-raid shelter .
During that process , a number of mistakes were made , among them the removal of a wall which did exist in the pre-shelter era , separating the alleged gas chamber from the adjacent washroom .
Only one internal wall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the washroom from the laying-out/dissecting room .
To this very day , this wall has a “ simple interior wall ” as installed during the conversion to an air-raid shelter .
Only after the collapse of the Communist Eastern Bloc did the Polish Auschwitz authorities start to acknowledge the fact that the facility as presented to visitors today is not an accurate “ reconstruction ” of the former alleged gas chamber , although the tour guides kept misrepresenting it to visitors .
A sign hinting at a few of the inaccuracies of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only in the early 2000s , see Illustration 1 .
The wall originally separating the morgue ( or “ gas chamber ” , marked “ c ” on the plans ) from the washroom ( marked “ b ” on the plans ) is missing today .
Starting from the assumption , caused by the Auschwitz Museum ’ s decade-long misrepresentation , that today ’ s state of the building is an accurate reconstruction of the situation during the war when homicidal gassing are said to have occurred , revisionists highlighted the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lack thereof ) in the claimed gas chamber would never have allowed the claimed mass murder .
For instance , Swedish eccentric revisionist Ditlieb Felderer wrote in 1980 : “ The doorposts [ of the door separating the alleged gas chamber from the former laying-out/dissecting room ] are made of wood , and the door itself is made of wood and glass .
The handle and lock are so weak that they keep falling apart .
The door opens inwards , into the ‘ gas chamber.
’ When we asked Mr. T. Szymanski @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , how it was that the gassees did not just smash the window in this door and escape , he advised us that he had never investigated this door so he could not give us a definite answer !
” Illustration 2 Below : Gas-tight steel door , type “ air-raid shelter ” , offered to the Auschwitz Camp , but never delivered .
Illustration 3 Above : One of the eight wedge locks of a gas-tight steel door , type “ air-raid shelter ” , offered to the Auschwitz Camp , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ levers into the lock position could rightly be called “ screwed shut ” .
The famous 1988 Leuchter Report acknowledged that the current state of the building is not original , “ since one wall had been removed , ” and therefore did not make any statement about the door currently visible .
However , at the end of a 1994 article , revisionist Robert Faurisson , ghostwriter of the Leuchter Report , added two images comparing the massive steel door of a US execution gas chamber with the flimsy wooden door with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the old crematorium since the wall from the morgue to the washroom had been knocked down in 1947 .
The caption to the image showing that door reads : “ One of the three doors of an alleged NS gas chamber for the execution of hundreds of persons at once with Zyklon B ( hydrogen cyanide ) ( Krematorium I , Auschwitz , Poland , beginning of the 40 ’ s ) .
” The same illustration with the same misleading caption can be found in the 2000 and 2003 English editions , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ edition .
It is misleading , because it was well known by the time these books were published that this door was never part of a homicidal gas chamber , even if the Auschwitz tour guides were still claiming this in the 1990s and early 2000s , and some may still be doing it today .
In 2005 , the English translation of Carlo Mattogno ’ s monograph on Krematorium I was published .
While it contains most of the witness testimony quoted earlier and goes into some detail about the various restructurings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not specifically address the question of the doors presumably installed in that building ’ s morgue while allegedly used for homicidal purposes .
The same year also saw the first English ( and 2nd German ) edition of my Lectures on the Holocaust , where I briefly addressed the issue of access doors to the morgue , albeit with a focus on the swing door between the morgue and the furnace room , shown on several war-time floor plans .
The same emphasis on that swing door , with much more detail , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s introductory contribution to C. Mattogno ’ s 2016 book Curated Lies .
While this proves that the blueprints do not reflect any outfitting of the morgue for homicidal purposes , it can be argued that such secrecy was in fact intentional , meaning that the floor plans were simply not updated in this regard , in particular regarding the swing door , in order to conceal the criminal changes made .
In a long 1998 article , German architect Willy Wallwey , writing under the pen names of Hans Jürgen Nowak and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documentation accessible in various Moscow archives reveals about gas-tight doors offered to , delivered to and installed in the various buildings at Auschwitz .
Wallwey concluded that the Auschwitz camp authorities did indeed request cost estimates for sturdy , gas-tight , and probably also panic-proof steel doors , but they were never delivered .
These doors even had so-called wedge locks used to close them in an air-tight fashion , a closing mechanism that could be called “ screwing ” the doors shut as described by witnesses , see Illustration 3 .
Illustration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I made of wood with a thin sheet metal cover , probably built by inmates in the camp ’ s workshop .
Illustration 5 : Blueprint of the wall anchor for a frame of a sturdy , gas-tight steel door .
The two existing air-raid-shelter doors made for Krematorium I in 1944 during the building ’ s conversion to an air-raid shelter are made of wooden planks covered by thin sheet metal , see Illustration 4 .
Although these doors were probably built by the local inmate workshop , so far no documentation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proves that not everything that was constructed at the Auschwitz Camp left a trace in the documental record , or if it did , that it has survived .
Hence , it is conceivable that sturdy gas-tight doors similar to those shown in Illustrations 2f .
were in fact delivered to Auschwitz and were subsequently installed there without leaving a documental trace .
While it can not be ruled out that panic-proof , gas-tight steel doors were indeed delivered to Auschwitz and may have been installed elsewhere , it can be ruled out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that any such door could have been installed in the relevant door openings of the morgue of Krematorium I .
First , we need to be aware that the frame of a massive wooden or even a steel door designed to withstand a panicking crowd needs to be anchored firmly in the wall .
Illustration 5 shows a hoop steel anchor with a so-called dovetail going some 14 cm ( 5.5 inches ) into the wall.22 Needless to say , the wall itself had to be considerably thicker than 14 cm .
Illustration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adjacent walls , rotated by 90° , with grey circles added to highlight the walls ’ width of 15 cm .
Turning to the war-time floor plans of this morgue , we see that the wall separating the morgue from the adjacent washroom and the wall separating it from the furnace room were both very thin : 15 cm , which is the width of a standard brick plus some plaster on both sides of it ( see Illustration 6 ) .
Hence , these walls consisted only of one row of bricks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ morgue from the furnace room consisted of two such walls with a gap of some 30 cm in between ( for thermal insulation ) .
It is not possible to set a steel anchor into bricks .
In such a case , bricks have to be removed , and then the anchor placed into a block of cement/concrete .
However , since these walls consisted only of one row of bricks – unless they consisted only of a wooden framework of 2-by-5s plus some boards , in which case we need no longer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to place an anchor embedded in cement in its stead would have left this chunk of cement held in place by nothing more than the bricks on top and at the bottom of it .
Such a chunk would have become loose very quickly .
Any forceful shaking of the door would have dislodged those anchors , bent the frame , and made the frame including the door fall out of the wall sooner or later .
In other words , the meager thickness of these walls proves that no sturdy , panic-proof @ @ @ @ @ @ @ installed in them .
The only option left for the traditionalists is to claim that these walls were reinforced to a much thicker width at the very moment the morgue is said to have been converted into a homicidal gas chamber , meaning in September 1941 .
Yet no evidence exists for this neither in the documental record nor in witness testimonies known to me .
As the late Dr. Robert Faurisson put it aptly :

The Thin Internal Walls of Krematorium I at Auschwitz
A Small Detail with Far-reaching Consequences
Germar Rudolf
Published: 2020-06-05
Abstract
The room inside the old crematorium of the Auschwitz Main Camp that was a morgue according to original war-time plans is said to have been used as a homicidal gas chamber between late 1941/early 1942 and the first half of 1943. It would seem that operating a homicidal gas chamber requires the installation of gas-tight, panic-proof doors to keep both the poisonous fumes and the victims safely inside. While there is no evidence in the extant documentation pointing to the existence of any such doors, orthodox historiography points to witness testimony indicating that such doors were in fact in place. A closer scrutiny of war-time blueprints reveals that the walls of this morgue which must have supported these doors were extremely thin, hence unable to support the installation of massive steel doors.
The Impetus of this Paper
On November 20,2019, I received the following email:
“Hello, my name is Federico Bussone, I’m from Italy. I think I have discovered an important weak point in the mainstream official story of the Auschwitz Main Camp crematorium. As far as I know, this weak point has never been highlighted by any revisionist, and so I would like to share with you my ‘discovery.’
We have to look at the original blueprint of the Crematorium I of April 10 1942 (but also the one from November 30 1940).
In both these plans, the wall of the left (short) side of the alleged gas chamber, that is, the wall with the entrance door, is REALLY THIN, it probably measures no more than 15 centimetres. As an architect, I understand well that such a partition could only have served as a dividing wall. It could have never withstand the stresses produced by the opening and closing of a heavy steel door. Let alone the blows and the pressure towards the outside exerted by the panicked prisoners.
I would like to emphasize that this type of wall, built of small solid bricks bound by mortar, became quite resistant only when built in a double row. In a single row, as it is in our case, it can be easily demolished with a little sledgehammer by a single worker, for example during house renovation.
It seems to me that this important fact has not been grasped so far. For example, the 3D models by Eric Hunt have the same (greater) thickness for all walls. The same for other drawings I have found in revisionist publications etc.
I hope this mail will be helpful!
Best regards.
Federico”
The Orthodox Narrative
After the former Polish military barracks south of the Polish city of Oswiecim had been converted into a concentration camp by German authorities following the Polish defeat in September 1939, the old munitions bunker on the grounds of that camp was converted into a crematorium for the incineration of the remains of deceased or executed inmates. In war-time and post-war literature, this building is alternately referred to as either the old crematorium or Crematorium I. The morgue of this facility is said to have been converted into a homicidal gas chamber subsequent to an initial test gassing conducted in the camp’s gaol in September of 1941. This was asserted already two months prior to the end of World War Two by a combined Polish-Soviet investigative commission, which stated the following about this in its report:
“In early 1941, a crematorium, designated as Crematorium #1, was started up in the Auschwitz camp. […] Next to this crematorium there was a gas chamber, which had, at either end, gas-tight doors with peep-holes and in the ceiling four openings with hermetic closures through which the ‘Zyklon’ for the killing of the persons was thrown. Crematorium I operated until March 1943 and existed in that form for two years.”
In preparation for the 1947 Polish show trial against former Auschwitz camp commandant Rudolf Höss, Polish engineer Dr. Roman Dawidowski compiled an expert report on evidence supporting homicidal gassing claims at Auschwitz, where we read on this topic:
“One now [in late 1941] began to poison people regularly with Zyklon B and to use for that purpose the Leichenhalle (morgue) of Crematorium I […]. This chamber […] on both sides had a gas-tight door.”
Jan Sehn, the Polish judge who led the investigation leading up to the Polish post-war show trials against former members of the German Auschwitz camp staff, wrote the following about this in his 1960 book on Auschwitz:
“The mortuary (Leichenkeller) of the first Oswiecim crematorium […] was fitted with two gas-proof doors.”
Claims about gas-tight doors in that morgue originate from witness testimony. Among them is Stanisław Jankowski, who stated regarding the doors in that room in a deposition October 3, 1980:
“The two thick wooden doors of the room, one in the side wall, the other in the end wall, had been made gas-tight.”
The post-war autobiography by Rudolf Höss, written while in Polish custody awaiting his execution, contains little information about the doors of this alleged gas chamber, only that they must have been very sturdy, because:
“When the powder [sic; Zyklon B] was thrown in [to the gas chamber], there were cries of ‘Gas!’, then a great bellowing, and the trapped prisoners [Russian PoWs to be gassed] hurled themselves against both the doors. But the doors held.”
Höss moreover speaks repeatedly of the doors being “screwed” shut, which points to a door with massive steel fixtures not found on usual doors.
In his post-war declaration writing in the summer of 1945, former SS man Pery Broad was a little more specific about the doors of this claimed homicidal gas chamber, making it clear that this was a heavy, gas-tight, panic-proof door:
“Suddenly the door was closed. It had been made tight with rubber and secured with iron fittings. Those inside heard the heavy bolts being secured. They were screwed to with screws, making the door air-tight. A deadly, paralysing terror spread among the victims. They started to beat upon the door, in helpless rage and despair they hammered with their fists upon it.”
While interrogated in preparation of the first Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, defendant Hans Stark made the following statements in his deposition about the doors of that room:
“As early as the autumn of 1941 gassings were carried out in a room of the small crematorium, the room having been fitted for that purpose. It could take in some 200–250 people, was higher than a normal living room, had no windows, and only one door that had been made [gas] tight and had a lock like the door of an air-raid shelter.”
The Current Material Situation
In the fall of 1944, the section of the old crematorium that contained the morgue, the washroom and the laying-out/dissecting room was converted into an air-raid shelter for the SS. For this purpose, the former interior walls of that section as well as the walls separating it from the furnace room were changed – I will address this in more detail later – and probably also the doors, as documentation indicates that the shelter’s interior doors were of a “simple” nature, hence neither gas-tight nor fragment-proof, as was initially foreseen, nor panic-proof, as would have been required for homicidal purposes.
Illustration 1: Sign posted outside the old crematorium at the former Auschwitz Main Camp juxtaposing the situation before the building’s conversion to an air-raid shelter (left) to the current situation (right).
In 1947, the freshly established Polish Auschwitz-Museum authorities restructured the building, among other things by removing some of the former air-raid shelter’s internal walls. By so doing they tried to recreate the state as it was before the conversion of this facility to an air-raid shelter. During that process, a number of mistakes were made, among them the removal of a wall which did exist in the pre-shelter era, separating the alleged gas chamber from the adjacent washroom. Only one internal wall was left, which used to separate the washroom from the laying-out/dissecting room. To this very day, this wall has a “simple interior wall” as installed during the conversion to an air-raid shelter.
Only after the collapse of the Communist Eastern Bloc did the Polish Auschwitz authorities start to acknowledge the fact that the facility as presented to visitors today is not an accurate “reconstruction” of the former alleged gas chamber, although the tour guides kept misrepresenting it to visitors. A sign hinting at a few of the inaccuracies of this botched reconstruction was installed near that building only in the early 2000s, see Illustration 1. The wall originally separating the morgue (or “gas chamber”, marked “c” on the plans) from the washroom (marked “b” on the plans) is missing today.
The Revisionist Position
Starting from the assumption, caused by the Auschwitz Museum’s decade-long misrepresentation, that today’s state of the building is an accurate reconstruction of the situation during the war when homicidal gassing are said to have occurred, revisionists highlighted the fact that the extant doors (or the lack thereof) in the claimed gas chamber would never have allowed the claimed mass murder. For instance, Swedish eccentric revisionist Ditlieb Felderer wrote in 1980:
“The doorposts [of the door separating the alleged gas chamber from the former laying-out/dissecting room] are made of wood, and the door itself is made of wood and glass. The handle and lock are so weak that they keep falling apart. The door opens inwards, into the ‘gas chamber.’ When we asked Mr. T. Szymanski, the (now retired) curator, how it was that the gassees did not just smash the window in this door and escape, he advised us that he had never investigated this door so he could not give us a definite answer!”
Illustration 2 Below: Gas-tight steel door, type “air-raid shelter”, offered to the Auschwitz Camp, but never delivered.
Illustration 3 Above: One of the eight wedge locks of a gas-tight steel door, type “air-raid shelter”, offered to the Auschwitz Camp, but never delivered. The wedging of these levers into the lock position could rightly be called “screwed shut”.
The famous 1988 Leuchter Report acknowledged that the current state of the building is not original, “since one wall had been removed,” and therefore did not make any statement about the door currently visible. However, at the end of a 1994 article, revisionist Robert Faurisson, ghostwriter of the Leuchter Report, added two images comparing the massive steel door of a US execution gas chamber with the flimsy wooden door with window pane which has been visible in the old crematorium since the wall from the morgue to the washroom had been knocked down in 1947. The caption to the image showing that door reads:
“One of the three doors of an alleged NS gas chamber for the execution of hundreds of persons at once with Zyklon B (hydrogen cyanide) (Krematorium I, Auschwitz, Poland, beginning of the 40’s).”
The same illustration with the same misleading caption can be found in the 2000 and 2003 English editions, but has been removed in the 2019 edition. It is misleading, because it was well known by the time these books were published that this door was never part of a homicidal gas chamber, even if the Auschwitz tour guides were still claiming this in the 1990s and early 2000s, and some may still be doing it today.
In 2005, the English translation of Carlo Mattogno’s monograph on Krematorium I was published. While it contains most of the witness testimony quoted earlier and goes into some detail about the various restructurings this building went through, it does not specifically address the question of the doors presumably installed in that building’s morgue while allegedly used for homicidal purposes.
The same year also saw the first English (and 2nd German) edition of my Lectures on the Holocaust, where I briefly addressed the issue of access doors to the morgue, albeit with a focus on the swing door between the morgue and the furnace room, shown on several war-time floor plans. The same emphasis on that swing door, with much more detail, can be found in Eric Hunt’s introductory contribution to C. Mattogno’s 2016 book Curated Lies. While this proves that the blueprints do not reflect any outfitting of the morgue for homicidal purposes, it can be argued that such secrecy was in fact intentional, meaning that the floor plans were simply not updated in this regard, in particular regarding the swing door, in order to conceal the criminal changes made.
Extant Documentation
In a long 1998 article, German architect Willy Wallwey, writing under the pen names of Hans Jürgen Nowak and Werner Rademacher, summarized what the extant documentation accessible in various Moscow archives reveals about gas-tight doors offered to, delivered to and installed in the various buildings at Auschwitz. Wallwey concluded that the Auschwitz camp authorities did indeed request cost estimates for sturdy, gas-tight, and probably also panic-proof steel doors, but they were never delivered. These doors even had so-called wedge locks used to close them in an air-tight fashion, a closing mechanism that could be called “screwing” the doors shut as described by witnesses, see Illustration 3.
Illustration 4: Make-shift air-raid-shelter door of Krematorium I made of wood with a thin sheet metal cover, probably built by inmates in the camp’s workshop.
Illustration 5: Blueprint of the wall anchor for a frame of a sturdy, gas-tight steel door.
The two existing air-raid-shelter doors made for Krematorium I in 1944 during the building’s conversion to an air-raid shelter are made of wooden planks covered by thin sheet metal, see Illustration 4. Although these doors were probably built by the local inmate workshop, so far no documentation about them has been found. This proves that not everything that was constructed at the Auschwitz Camp left a trace in the documental record, or if it did, that it has survived. Hence, it is conceivable that sturdy gas-tight doors similar to those shown in Illustrations 2f. were in fact delivered to Auschwitz and were subsequently installed there without leaving a documental trace.
The Blueprints
While it cannot be ruled out that panic-proof, gas-tight steel doors were indeed delivered to Auschwitz and may have been installed elsewhere, it can be ruled out, based on war-time floor plans, that any such door could have been installed in the relevant door openings of the morgue of Krematorium I.
Illustration 6: Inventory plan of Krematorium I, dated April 10, 1942. RGVA, 502-2-146, p. 21.
First, we need to be aware that the frame of a massive wooden or even a steel door designed to withstand a panicking crowd needs to be anchored firmly in the wall. Illustration 5 shows a hoop steel anchor with a so-called dovetail going some 14 cm (5.5 inches) into the wall.22 Needless to say, the wall itself had to be considerably thicker than 14 cm.
Illustration 7: section enlargement of washroom with adjacent walls, rotated by 90°, with grey circles added to highlight the walls’ width of 15 cm.
Turning to the war-time floor plans of this morgue, we see that the wall separating the morgue from the adjacent washroom and the wall separating it from the furnace room were both very thin: 15 cm, which is the width of a standard brick plus some plaster on both sides of it (see Illustration 6). Hence, these walls consisted only of one row of bricks set lengthwise. The wall separating the morgue from the furnace room consisted of two such walls with a gap of some 30 cm in between (for thermal insulation).
It is not possible to set a steel anchor into bricks. In such a case, bricks have to be removed, and then the anchor placed into a block of cement/concrete. However, since these walls consisted only of one row of bricks – unless they consisted only of a wooden framework of 2-by-5s plus some boards, in which case we need no longer discuss this issue – removing a brick to place an anchor embedded in cement in its stead would have left this chunk of cement held in place by nothing more than the bricks on top and at the bottom of it. Such a chunk would have become loose very quickly. Any forceful shaking of the door would have dislodged those anchors, bent the frame, and made the frame including the door fall out of the wall sooner or later.
In other words, the meager thickness of these walls proves that no sturdy, panic-proof door of any kind could have been installed in them.
The only option left for the traditionalists is to claim that these walls were reinforced to a much thicker width at the very moment the morgue is said to have been converted into a homicidal gas chamber, meaning in September 1941. Yet no evidence exists for this neither in the documental record nor in witness testimonies known to me.
As the late Dr. Robert Faurisson put it aptly:
“No doors, no destruction.”
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-07-05--I Am Health Exempt From Wearing a Mask

I Am Health Exempt From Wearing a Mask

Any medical intervention must be shown to be safe ( i.e.
, does not cause harm ) and effective for FDA approval .
Masks have not been proven to be safe to wear or effective in preventing the spread of viral diseases .
While many states and local communities have put in place mask mandates , there is a lack of understanding of the risks and unintended consequences of the mask requirement. Wearing a mask is a choice .
Why would I choose to not wear a mask ?
• It may negatively impact my health by causing poor oxygenation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wearing a cloth mask may even increase the risk of infecting myself and others.a • Masks have not been proven to be effective in preventing the spread of COVID-19 .
Due to the particle size of the virus and the pore size of mask materials , wearing a mask is unlikely to protect me or protect others.b • The risk of an asymptomatic individual ( i.e.
, a healthy person ) infecting others appears to be very low .
I am aware that both the infection and complication rate of COVID-19 are no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandates are unconstitutional , and I maintain the freedom to choose how to protect my health in non-medical settings.d As mandating face masks can not be legally enforced , I have chosen to review the available evidence and trust my intuition , ultimately concluding that the potential medical and psychological harms of wearing a mask in public settings does not outweigh these risks .
Further details and references that support my rationale for declining to wear a mask : • a .
Wearing a mask negatively impacts my health • 1 .
May @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at or below 95 % ) or hypoxia  ( insufficient tissue oxygen levels ) as well as hypercapnia  ( elevation of blood carbon dioxide levels ) • a .
Symptoms include dizziness , shortness of breath , lack of energy , headache , sweating , irritability , rapid heartbeat , and chest pain • b .
A randomized clinical trial showed that in medical staff members aged 20-50 , wearing N95 masks resulted in hypoxemia and hypercapnia , reducing work efficiency and the ability to make correct decisions and causing headache @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • c. The brain is the most susceptible organ to hypoxia , and cognitive and visual function can be impaired when oxygen levels reach 85 % or below • d. Continued low oxygen levels may lead to cyanosis ( blue discoloration of nail beds , skin , and lips ) , which is considered an emergency because it can lead to life-threatening respiratory failure or cardiac arrest • e. Even if not life threatening , sustained low blood oxygenation levels and high carbon dioxide levels can deteriorate short term memory , damage eyesight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ damage neuronal connections 2,3 • f. Supporting the idea that hypoxia is a medical condition ,  Medicare will pay for oxygen therapy and oxygen equipment if blood oxygenation levels are below 88 % 1 • g. Referenced are several other peer-reviewed studies that have found evidence of masks causing hypoxia and/or hypercapnia5,6,7 • 2 .
May facilitate entry of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and other viruses to my brain8 • a .
The most likely way for a virus to enter the brain is via the olfactory nerves in your nostrils9 ; as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viruses , potentially allowing them to enter my olfactory nerves and travel to my brain 10,11 • 3 .
Homemade cloth masks , which are rarely washed after every use , may actually increase the transmission of COVID-19 and other bacterial and viral infections by trapping moisture or prompting behaviors like increased face and eye touching .
In fact , the January 2020 WHO guidance stated that “ Cloth ( e.g .
cotton or gauze ) masks are not recommended under any circumstance.
” 12 • a .
The most compelling evidence of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ controlled trial in which 1600 healthcare workers were divided into 3 groups ( medical masks , cloth masks , or a control group ) , and the rates of clinical respiratory illness and influenza-like illness ( ILI ) were compared after 4 weeks .
The rates of all infections were highest in the cloth mask arm- yes , higher than the control arm .
This study also concluded that 97 % of particles penetrate cloth masks , whereas 44 % penetrate medical masks.13 • b .
There is no proof that wearing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 • i .
Numerous randomized controlled trials have been conducted to determine if masks or respirators prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses , ultimately concluding that they do not work.14 , 15,16,17,18 • ii .
In the June 5 , 2020 guidance from the WHO,19 researchers compiled the filtration efficiency metrics of several types of non-medical ( i.e .
homemade ) cloth masks and found that none provided significant filtration .
• 1 .
For example , filtration efficiency of cotton ( from a T-shirt ) ranged from 5-26 % • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ handkerchief was 1.1 % • iii .
There is no evidence that asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers can infect others with the disease .
A May 2020 study tested 455 contacts of an asymptomatic patient , finding that zero contacts contracted COVID-19 from the patient who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.20 • c. The CDC , WHO , federal government , local governments , and various health agencies have provided conflicting and ever-changing guidance on the utility of healthy people wearing masks in non-medical settings .
Most recent guidance from the WHO ( June 5 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefits and harms of wearing masks • i .
Benefits include : reduced potential exposure risk from infected persons before they develop symptoms , reduced potential stigmatization of individuals wearing masks , making people feel that they can play a role in contributing to stopping spread of virus , and providing a source of income • 1 .
Harms/disadvantages include : potential increased risk of self-contamination due to the manipulation of a face mask and subsequently touching eyes with contaminated hands , potential headache and/or breathing difficulties , potential development of facial skin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • ii .
On March 2 , the US Surgeon General called for people to stop buying masks as they could increase a person ’ s risk of contracting COVID-19,22 a recommendation that he reversed on April 323 • d. Mandating masks is unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable • i .
On April 16 , 2020 , the White House released “ Guidelines for Opening Up America Again , ” in which individuals were advised to “ strongly consider using face coverings while in public ” 24 • 1 .
Executive orders issued by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that “ require ” the wearing of face masks are in direct conflict with federal guidance • ii .
As such , a Texas judge announced that Galveston County will not be mandating its citizens to wear face coverings in public , calling such decrees “ unconstitutional ” 25 • iii .
County , state , or town agencies lack the legal authority to create a mandate for citizens to wear masks and therefore shall be enjoined from enforcing such measures

Any medical intervention must be shown to be safe (i.e., does not cause harm) and effective for FDA approval. Masks have not been proven to be safe to wear or effective in preventing the spread of viral diseases.
While many states and local communities have put in place mask mandates, there is a lack of understanding of the risks and unintended consequences of the mask requirement.
Wearing a mask is a choice. Why would I choose to not wear a mask?
It may negatively impact my health  by causing poor oxygenation levels that can lead to hypoxemia. Wearing a cloth mask may even increase the risk of infecting myself and others. a
by causing poor oxygenation levels that can lead to hypoxemia. Wearing a cloth mask may even increase the risk of infecting myself and others. Masks have not been proven to be effective  in preventing the spread of COVID-19. Due to the particle size of the virus and the pore size of mask materials, wearing a mask is unlikely to protect me or protect others. b
in preventing the spread of COVID-19. Due to the particle size of the virus and the pore size of mask materials, wearing a mask is unlikely to protect me or protect others. The risk of an asymptomatic individual (i.e., a healthy person) infecting others appears to be very low. I  am aware that both the infection and complication rate of COVID-19 are no higher than the common flu. c
I am aware that both the infection and complication rate of COVID-19 are no higher than the common flu. Masks mandates are unconstitutional, and I maintain the freedom to choose how to protect my health in non-medical settings.d
As mandating face masks cannot be legally enforced, I have chosen to review the available evidence and trust my intuition, ultimately concluding that the potential medical and psychological harms of wearing a mask in public settings does not outweigh these risks.
Further details and references that support my rationale for declining to wear a mask:
a. Wearing a mask negatively impacts my health 1. May cause  hypoxemia (blood oxygen levels at or below 95%) or  hypoxia (insufficient tissue oxygen levels) as well as  hypercapnia (elevation of blood carbon dioxide levels) a. Symptoms include dizziness, shortness of breath, lack of energy, headache , sweating, irritability, rapid heartbeat, and chest pain b. A randomized clinical trial showed that in medical staff members aged 20-50, wearing N95 masks resulted in hypoxemia and hypercapnia , reducing work efficiency and the ability to make correct decisions and causing headache, dizziness, and shortness of breath 4  c. The brain is the most susceptible organ to hypoxia, and cognitive and visual function can be impaired when oxygen levels reach 85% or below d. Continued low oxygen levels may lead to cyanosis (blue discoloration of nail beds, skin, and lips),  which is considered an emergency because it can lead to life-threatening respiratory failure or cardiac arrest e. Even if not life threatening, sustained low blood oxygenation levels and high carbon dioxide levels can deteriorate short term memory, damage eyesight, weaken my heart muscle, and damage neuronal connections 2   , 3  f. Supporting the idea that hypoxia is a medical condition, Medicare will pay for oxygen therapy and oxygen equipment if blood oxygenation levels are below 88% 1  g. Referenced are  several other peer-reviewed studies that have found evidence of masks causing hypoxia and/or hypercapnia 5   , 6   , 7  2. May facilitate entry of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and other viruses to my brain 8  a. The most likely way for a virus to enter the brain is via the olfactory nerves in your nostrils 9   ; as such, wearing a mask traps exhaled viruses, potentially allowing them to enter my olfactory nerves and travel to my brain 10   , 11  3. Homemade cloth masks, which are rarely washed after every use, may actually increase the transmission of COVID-19 and other bacterial and viral infections by trapping moisture or prompting behaviors like increased face and eye touching. In fact, the January 2020 WHO guidance stated that “Cloth (e.g. cotton or gauze) masks are not recommended under any circumstance.” 12  a. The most compelling evidence of increased disease transmission comes from a randomized controlled trial in which 1600 healthcare workers were divided into 3 groups (medical masks, cloth masks, or a control group), and the rates of clinical respiratory illness and influenza-like illness (ILI) were compared after 4 weeks. The rates of all infections were highest in the cloth mask arm - yes, higher than the control arm. This study also concluded that 97% of particles penetrate cloth masks, whereas 44% penetrate medical masks. 13  b. There is no proof that wearing a mask protects me or protects others from becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 i. Numerous randomized controlled trials have been conducted to determine if masks or respirators prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses,  ultimately concluding that they do not work. 14   , 15   , 16   , 17   , 18  ii. In the June 5, 2020 guidance from the WHO, 19   researchers compiled the filtration efficiency metrics of several types of non-medical (i.e. homemade) cloth masks and found that none provided significant filtration. 1. For example, filtration efficiency of cotton (from a T-shirt) ranged from 5-26% a. Filtration efficiency of cotton from a handkerchief was 1.1% iii. There is no evidence that asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers can infect others with the disease. A May 2020 study tested 455 contacts of an asymptomatic patient, finding that  zero contacts contracted COVID-19 from the patient who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 . 20  c. The CDC, WHO, federal government, local governments, and various health agencies have provided conflicting and ever-changing guidance on the utility of healthy people wearing masks in non-medical settings. Most recent guidance from the WHO (June 5, 2020) 21   outlines the potential benefits and harms of wearing masks i. Benefits include: reduced potential exposure risk from infected persons before they develop symptoms, reduced potential stigmatization of individuals wearing masks, making people feel that they can play a role in contributing to stopping spread of virus, and providing a source of income 1. Harms/disadvantages include:  potential increased risk of self-contamination due to the manipulation of a face mask and subsequently touching eyes with contaminated hands, potential headache and/or breathing difficulties, potential development of facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis or worsening acne ii. On March 2, the US Surgeon General called for people to stop buying masks as they could increase a person’s risk of contracting COVID-19, 22   a recommendation that he reversed on April 3 23  d. Mandating masks is unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable i. On April 16, 2020, the White House released “Guidelines for Opening Up America Again,” in which individuals were advised to “strongly consider using face coverings while in public” 24  1. Executive orders issued by state, county, or town governments that “require” the wearing of face masks are in direct conflict with federal guidance ii. As such, a Texas judge announced that Galveston County will not be mandating its citizens to wear face coverings in public, calling such decrees “unconstitutional” 25  iii. County, state, or town agencies lack the legal authority to create a mandate for citizens to wear masks and therefore shall be enjoined from enforcing such measures
References
1. https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/Home-Oxygen-Therapy-Text-Only.pdf
2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18331781/
3. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-35797-3
4. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00173017
5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4647822/
6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/
7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159120303573
9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2543129/
10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094171/
11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32104915/
12. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330987/WHO-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isA1lowed=y
13. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32167245/
16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19797474/
17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/
18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20092668/
19. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak
20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219423/
21. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavrus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak
22. https://www.businessinsider.com/americans-dont-need-masks-pence-says-as-demand-increases-2020-2
23. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-18/
24. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Guidelines-for-Opening-Up-America-Again.pdf?mod=article_inline
25. https://www.newswars.com/texas-judge-mandatory-face-masks-laws-unconstitutional/


renegadetribune--2020-07-05--Why The Name Karen?

Why The Name Karen?

As you are well aware by now , the name Karen is under attack .
Was this a random choice of name to denigrate ?
I don ’ t think so .
What does the name Karen mean and where does it come from ?
The name Karen means Pure and is of Scandinavian origin .
Karen entered the English language from Danish , where it has been a short form of “ Katherine ” since medieval times .
It became popular in the English-speaking world in the 1940s .
The name Karen was one of the top 10 names @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during the 1950s and 1960s , peaking as the third most popular girl ’ s name in 1965 .
Karen is a Danish diminutive of Katherine , an English name derived from the Greek Aikaterine .
The etymology of Aikaterine is contested , but generally considered to have arisen from the Greek root katharos , meaning “ pure.
” Kaja is a related name , as it is another Danish variation of Katherine .
Karen , a sweet good-girl Danish import , was so popular during the baby boom ( Karen was Number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s locked firmly into fashion limbo today .
Karen is a variant of Katherine .
Katherine originates in Greek language and means “ chaste , pure ” .
It has been one of the most popular feminine given names over centuries and with various spellings all around the world .
Where did the Karen meme originate ?
Comedian Dane Cook , in a bit from 2005 , used “ Karen ” as the butt of a joke , as a placeholder for the friend no one actually liked .
The film ‘ Mean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year earlier in 2004 , contains the line : “ Oh my god , Karen , you can ’ t just ask people why they ’ re white.
” The Karen meme wouldn ’ t reach its final form until almost a decade later when the subreddit r/FuckYouKaren was created in 2017 , where it has amassed more than 600,000 members .
The page ’ s description says it ’ s “ dedicated to the hatred of Karen ” and its profile picture is of Kate Gosselin .
I ’ m speculating that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profile picture is because Gosselin and her ex-husband were divorced in 2009 , spawning more than 10 years of a custody battle over their kids and apparently “ Karens ” are ex-wives who wanted to take the kids in the divorce .
Karens also are evil anti-vaxxers who don ’ t want their babies being injected with neurotoxins .
Karen is also used to denigrate White women that refuse to wear contaminated face diapers a.k.a masks .
Karen is now any White woman who speaks her mind , tries to hold high standards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unwilling to put up with BS .
To see the video being referenced above , check it out here : I don ’ t think this is any accident .
They are attacking purity .

As you are well aware by now, the name Karen is under attack. Was this a random choice of name to denigrate? I don’t think so. What does the name Karen mean and where does it come from?
The name Karen means Pure and is of Scandinavian origin. Karen entered the English language from Danish, where it has been a short form of “Katherine” since medieval times. It became popular in the English-speaking world in the 1940s. The name Karen was one of the top 10 names for girls born in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s, peaking as the third most popular girl’s name in 1965. Karen is a Danish diminutive of Katherine, an English name derived from the Greek Aikaterine. The etymology of Aikaterine is contested, but generally considered to have arisen from the Greek root katharos, meaning “pure.” Kaja is a related name, as it is another Danish variation of Katherine. Karen, a sweet good-girl Danish import, was so popular during the baby boom (Karen was Number 3 in 1960) that it’s locked firmly into fashion limbo today. Karen is a variant of Katherine. Katherine originates in Greek language and means “chaste, pure”. It has been one of the most popular feminine given names over centuries and with various spellings all around the world.
Where did the Karen meme originate? Comedian Dane Cook, in a bit from 2005, used “Karen” as the butt of a joke, as a placeholder for the friend no one actually liked.
If you're Jewish I want to wish you a very Happy New Year!!!!
If you're not Jewish… hey… it's Wednesday night. — Dane Cook (@DaneCook) September 5, 2013
The film ‘Mean Girls’, which came out one year earlier in 2004, contains the line: “Oh my god, Karen, you can’t just ask people why they’re white.”
The Karen meme wouldn’t reach its final form until almost a decade later when the subreddit r/FuckYouKaren was created in 2017, where it has amassed more than 600,000 members. The page’s description says it’s “dedicated to the hatred of Karen” and its profile picture is of Kate Gosselin. I’m speculating that the reason they chose Gosselin as the profile picture is because Gosselin and her ex-husband were divorced in 2009, spawning more than 10 years of a custody battle over their kids and apparently “Karens” are ex-wives who wanted to take the kids in the divorce. Karens also are evil anti-vaxxers who don’t want their babies being injected with neurotoxins. Karen is also used to denigrate White women that refuse to wear contaminated face diapers a.k.a masks.
Karen is now any White woman who speaks her mind, tries to hold high standards for herself and others, and is unwilling to put up with BS.
To see the video being referenced above, check it out here:
http://www.renegadetribune.com/young-woman-destroys-the-racial-double-standards/
I don’t think this is any accident. They are attacking purity.
Share now!
Author: Sinead is a musician, writer, and thinker. Sinead is a musician, writer, and thinker.


renegadetribune--2020-07-05--Armed Black Militia Marches at Stone Mountain to Demand Its Destruction

The largest Confederate monument is carved into the side of Stone Mountain , measuring nine stories high and a football @ @ @ @ @ July 4th , an armed Black militia marched to demand its destruction and also intimidate @ @ @ @ @ reparations .
You can only imagine what would have been the fallout if the races @ @ @ @

The largest Confederate monument is carved into the side of Stone Mountain, measuring nine stories high and a football field in length. On July 4th, an armed Black militia marched to demand its destruction and also intimidate White drivers into giving them reparations. You can only imagine what would have been the fallout if the races had been reversed.
Bitchute link
In Stone Mountain, Georgia earlier today pic.twitter.com/F2Autd4YtI — Naomi (@naomiruta) July 4, 2020
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-07-05--Israel Defense Ministry Launches COVID-19 Voice Test for Americans

The Israeli Ministry of Defense has launched a project to analyze people ’ s voices and breathing patterns using artificial intelligence ( AI ) in order to determine if they have COVID-19 .
The software allegedly listens for detectable “ signs of distress , ” ostensibly from the respiratory effects of the virus .
A May 27 report in the Jerusalem Post stated that the research was already being conducted at several hospitals in Israel , where confirmed COVID-19 patients were asked to provide voice samples to be compared to those of a control group from the general population .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in June .
However , the study has now been expanded beyond Israel ’ s borders .
Over one million voice recordings are currently being collected in the United States through a mobile app developed by Massachusetts-based Vocalis Health , under the auspices of the Israeli government .
While growth in the biomarker sector is strong , the applications of voice biomarker technology lean heavily towards surveillance and language parsing , as opposed to diagnostic applications , which are virtually non-existent at the moment .
Vocal biometric data has already been making its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least two years .
Thousands of police departments across the United States , for instance , use a voice-recognition technology called “ Dragon Law Enforcement ” developed by Nuance Communications .
This same company has established a strong presence in the healthcare sector as well .
In 2018 , Nuance partnered with the healthcare software giant , Epic Systems , which is said to hold two-thirds of medical records in the U.S. , and its Dragon Medical speech recognition software is used by half a million clinicians throughout the country .
Epic and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several companies lurching into the freshly-minted Coronavirus tech marketplace along with at least 150 Israeli startups that began working on ideas relating to COVID-19 back in 2019 – many under the guise of healthcare .
But , their value as a medical diagnostic tool looks certain to be outweighed by its broader applications in burgeoning pre-crime law enforcement technologies that are now proliferating across the United States and the world .
Founded just weeks after U.S. intelligence agencies alerted the Israeli government about the threat posed by the novel coronavirus in November 2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ merger of two Israeli tech companies , Beyond Verbal and Healthymize .
Israeli life sciences venture fund Amoon raised the initial $ 9 million capital for the new company , which focuses on developing artificial intelligence and voice analysis applications for the health sector .
Vocalis Health CEO , Tal Wenderow , said he decided to make a $ 1.1 billion exit from his medical robotics company , Corindus in 2019 and pursue opportunities in “ health , voice , and AI ” after realizing “ the untapped sense of the human body @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good opportunity.
” The “ COVID-19 Voice Study ” initiated by the Israeli Ministry of Defense and actualized by Vocalis Health will seek 100,000 volunteers to conduct the research which is slated for completion by December 1 with an anticipated product release by the beginning of 2021 .
Vocalis Health ’ s AI-enabled research of the voice recordings in order to “ triage , screen and monitor COVID-19 virus ” will utilize a platform developed by NeuroLex Laboratories , Inc , called the Voiceome Study – the “ world ’ s largest clinical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health traits ” according to their Indiegogo campaign .
Eventually , Vocalis intends to use “ this technology as a population health screening tool that could be applied to vast quantities of data collected from call centers or devices ” .
NeuroLex founder and CEO , Jim Schwoebel claims voice biomarker technology is analogous to genetic code and can “ use machine learning models on speech features to infer health conditions.
” While voice biomarkers have been used to aid in the diagnosis of neurological disorders , such as Alzheimer ’ s , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which may manifest in voice patterns , the scientific validity of these being of any use in diagnosing specific viral infections is still an open question .
Along with finger tapping speed , sleep movements and walking , it is one of the forms of digital biomarkers under investigation in this nascent area of scientific inquiry and , as NeuroLex ’ s Chief Medical Officer , Dr. Hosseini Ghomi noted in 2019 , “ the field of digital biomarkers is still very fragmented because there are no standards for voice recording or an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Health used to bootstrap its app , Voiceome , also received funding from a venture capital firm with strong ties to Israel and the IDF through one of its partners , David Gussarsky , a former head of software development teams for the Israel Defense Forces and former IDF special ops commander , Tal Morgenstern .
The ubiquitous presence of Israeli defense interests versus health in this endeavor raises questions about the ultimate goal behind it .
Multiple difficulties are posed by the very literature and disclosures published on the COVID-19 Voice Study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most salient red flags is the consent form offered volunteers , which makes no mention of COVID-19 as one of the “ medical and behavioral health conditions ” they seek to identify .
It does , however , name the neurological conditions NeuroLex designed its algorithms to detect .
But , even these are completely undermined by Jim Schwoebel , himself , in the “ Risk and Challenges ” portion of the Indiegogo campaign where he reminds us of that if the proposed project doesn ’ t work , Voiceome “ can still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on machine learning models for medical questionnaires like PHQ-9 , a depression scoring model and UPDRS , a rating scale for Parkinson ’ s disease .

By Raul Diego
The Israeli Ministry of Defense has launched a project to analyze people’s voices and breathing patterns using artificial intelligence (AI) in order to determine if they have COVID-19. The software allegedly listens for detectable “signs of distress,” ostensibly from the respiratory effects of the virus. A May 27 report in the Jerusalem Post stated that the research was already being conducted at several hospitals in Israel, where confirmed COVID-19 patients were asked to provide voice samples to be compared to those of a control group from the general population.
Results from the research were expected sometime in June. However, the study has now been expanded beyond Israel’s borders. Over one million voice recordings are currently being collected in the United States through a mobile app developed by Massachusetts-based Vocalis Health, under the auspices of the Israeli government.
While growth in the biomarker sector is strong, the applications of voice biomarker technology lean heavily towards surveillance and language parsing, as opposed to diagnostic applications, which are virtually non-existent at the moment. Vocal biometric data has already been making its way into American law enforcement for at least two years.
Thousands of police departments across the United States, for instance, use a voice-recognition technology called “Dragon Law Enforcement” developed by Nuance Communications. This same company has established a strong presence in the healthcare sector as well. In 2018, Nuance partnered with the healthcare software giant, Epic Systems, which is said to hold two-thirds of medical records in the U.S., and its Dragon Medical speech recognition software is used by half a million clinicians throughout the country.
Epic and Nuance Communications are only a few of several companies lurching into the freshly-minted Coronavirus tech marketplace along with at least 150 Israeli startups that began working on ideas relating to COVID-19 back in 2019 – many under the guise of healthcare. But, their value as a medical diagnostic tool looks certain to be outweighed by its broader applications in burgeoning pre-crime law enforcement technologies that are now proliferating across the United States and the world.
Unproven Science
Founded just weeks after U.S. intelligence agencies alerted the Israeli government about the threat posed by the novel coronavirus in November 2019, the company was formed from the merger of two Israeli tech companies, Beyond Verbal and Healthymize. Israeli life sciences venture fund Amoon raised the initial $9 million capital for the new company, which focuses on developing artificial intelligence and voice analysis applications for the health sector.
Vocalis Health CEO, Tal Wenderow, said he decided to make a $1.1 billion exit from his medical robotics company, Corindus in 2019 and pursue opportunities in “health, voice, and AI” after realizing “the untapped sense of the human body” presented him with “a very good opportunity.” The “COVID-19 Voice Study” initiated by the Israeli Ministry of Defense and actualized by Vocalis Health will seek 100,000 volunteers to conduct the research which is slated for completion by December 1 with an anticipated product release by the beginning of 2021.
Vocalis Health’s AI-enabled research of the voice recordings in order to “triage, screen and monitor COVID-19 virus” will utilize a platform developed by NeuroLex Laboratories, Inc, called the Voiceome Study – the “world’s largest clinical study to collect voice information labeled with health traits” according to their Indiegogo campaign. Eventually, Vocalis intends to use “this technology as a population health screening tool that could be applied to vast quantities of data collected from call centers or devices”.
NeuroLex founder and CEO, Jim Schwoebel claims voice biomarker technology is analogous to genetic code and can “use machine learning models on speech features to infer health conditions.” While voice biomarkers have been used to aid in the diagnosis of neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and others, which may manifest in voice patterns, the scientific validity of these being of any use in diagnosing specific viral infections is still an open question. Along with finger tapping speed, sleep movements and walking, it is one of the forms of digital biomarkers under investigation in this nascent area of scientific inquiry and, as NeuroLex’s Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Hosseini Ghomi noted in 2019, “the field of digital biomarkers is still very fragmented because there are no standards for voice recording or an organizing force.”
A Dubious Proposition
The platform that Vocalis Health used to bootstrap its app, Voiceome, also received funding from a venture capital firm with strong ties to Israel and the IDF through one of its partners, David Gussarsky, a former head of software development teams for the Israel Defense Forces and former IDF special ops commander, Tal Morgenstern. The ubiquitous presence of Israeli defense interests versus health in this endeavor raises questions about the ultimate goal behind it.
Multiple difficulties are posed by the very literature and disclosures published on the COVID-19 Voice Study’s own site. Among the most salient red flags is the consent form offered volunteers, which makes no mention of COVID-19 as one of the “medical and behavioral health conditions” they seek to identify. It does, however, name the neurological conditions NeuroLex designed its algorithms to detect. But, even these are completely undermined by Jim Schwoebel, himself, in the “Risk and Challenges” portion of the Indiegogo campaign where he reminds us of that if the proposed project doesn’t work, Voiceome “can still provide […] relevant reports” on machine learning models for medical questionnaires like PHQ-9, a depression scoring model and UPDRS, a rating scale for Parkinson’s disease.
The “product,” which will eventually result from the study in January of 2021 according to their development timeline, is supposed to “alert about early symptoms and monitoring at home by only using a smart phone,” notifying authorities who can then implement the requisite measures based on unproven technology. Source: MintPress News Feature photo | Israeli medical personnel wearing protective gear checks identifications before a government COVID-19 test in Bnei Brak, Israel, March 31, 2020. Ariel Schalit | AP Raul Diego is a MintPress News Staff Writer, independent photojournalist, researcher, writer and documentary filmmaker.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-07-06--Black Woman Steals White Woman’s Dog and Viciously Assaults Her With It

Remember when Amy Cooper was walking her dog in Central Park when a Black man appeared to threaten their well-being ?
It was right before the George Floyd PsyOp hit .
Cooper got scared and called the police on the Black man .
She was called the Central Park Karen for her “ hysterical ” behavior and fired from her job for daring to call the police on an angry Black man who had it out for her and her dog .
Well , perhaps fearing for the safety of oneself and one ’ s dog around an angry Black @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emerged of a Black woman , perhaps “ protesting ” in the middle of a street , stealing a White woman ’ s dog , dangling it around in the air while it is strangulated by its collar , and swinging it at the owner , who tries desperately to get her poor pet back .
The cruelty seen her is unimaginable for most people .
This is not even close to being an isolated incident of black cruelty towards dogs .
During the recent rioting , some Black people stole a dog @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on live TV .
Seeing this kind of abuse really gets me angry .
I know White people abuse animals too ( what do you think animal agriculture entails ? )
, but there seems to be some kind of extra animosity between Blacks and dogs , or at least a complete lack of compassion with some of these people .
It starts young , too .
We also shouldn ’ t forget the famous case of Michael Vick , and how we just did not understand his “ cultural ” upbringing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dog fighting ring .

Remember when Amy Cooper was walking her dog in Central Park when a Black man appeared to threaten their well-being? It was right before the George Floyd PsyOp hit. Cooper got scared and called the police on the Black man. She was called the Central Park Karen for her “hysterical” behavior and fired from her job for daring to call the police on an angry Black man who had it out for her and her dog.
Well, perhaps fearing for the safety of oneself and one’s dog around an angry Black person is completely justified. Recent footage emerged of a Black woman, perhaps “protesting” in the middle of a street, stealing a White woman’s dog, dangling it around in the air while it is strangulated by its collar, and swinging it at the owner, who tries desperately to get her poor pet back. The cruelty seen her is unimaginable for most people.
Bitchute link
This is not even close to being an isolated incident of black cruelty towards dogs. During the recent rioting, some Black people stole a dog from a rescue yard and killed it on live TV.
Bitchute link
Seeing this kind of abuse really gets me angry. I know White people abuse animals too (what do you think animal agriculture entails?), but there seems to be some kind of extra animosity between Blacks and dogs, or at least a complete lack of compassion with some of these people. It starts young, too.
371 views
We also shouldn’t forget the famous case of Michael Vick, and how we just did not understand his “cultural” upbringing, which led him to run a massive dog fighting ring.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-07-06--Who Raped Untold Thousands of British Children?

While indigenous Brits get imprisoned for putting up stickers , non-White invaders who run child sex slavery gangs are protected @ @ @ @

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-07-06--Orphic Hymn to Justice

Orphic Hymn to Justice

THE piercing eye of Justice bright , I sing , Plac ’ d by the throne of heav ’ n @ @ @ @ @ Perceiving thence , with vision unconfin ’ d , The life and conduct of the @ @ @ @ @ revenge and punishment belong , Chastising ev ’ ry deed , unjust and wrong ; @ @ @ @ @ , dissimilars can join , And from th ’ equality of truth combine : For @ @ @ @ @ can inspire , When urging bad designs , with counsel dire , ‘ Tis thine @ @ @ @ @ the race Of lawless passions , and incentives base ; For thou art ever to @ @ @ @ @ , And hostile to the men of evil mind .
Come , all-propitious , and @ @ @ @ @ Fate ’ s predestin ’ d , final hour draws near .

THE piercing eye of Justice bright, I sing,
Plac’d by the throne of heav’n’s almighty king,
Perceiving thence, with vision unconfin’d,
The life and conduct of the human kind
To thee, revenge and punishment belong,
Chastising ev’ry deed, unjust and wrong;
Whose pow’r alone, dissimilars can join,
And from th’ equality of truth combine:
For all the ill, persuasion can inspire,
When urging bad designs, with counsel dire,
‘Tis thine alone to punish; with the race
Of lawless passions, and incentives base;
For thou art ever to the good inclin’d,
And hostile to the men of evil mind.
Come, all-propitious, and thy suppliant hear,
When Fate’s predestin’d, final hour draws near.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-07-06--Op-Ed: “No One Has Died From the Coronavirus”

A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent .
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization ( WHO ) a “ criminal medical organization ” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic .
Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association ( BPA ) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it ’ s currently “ impossible ” to create a vaccine against the virus .
He also revealed that European pathologists haven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specific for SARS-CoV-2 .
These stunning statements raise major questions , including about officials ’ and scientists ’ claims regarding the many vaccines they ’ re rushing into clinical trials around the world .
They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies ( which are beginning to be used to treat patients ) .
Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries ( some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate ) .
And they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK , US , and Canada .
Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8 , 2020 , European Society of Pathology ( ESP ) webinar on COVID-19 .
The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov , chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens ’ Rights in Sofia and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The video is on the BPA ’ s website , which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov ’ s main points .
We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English .
We then transcribed her translation .
The video is here and our English transcript is here .
Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found .
The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology .
This is done via immunohistochemistry , which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them .
After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they ’ re specific for , the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they ’ re bound to – are located .
Therefore , in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body , or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else .
It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘ conspiracy theorist.
’ After all many people believe they ’ re everywhere these days , spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues .
In addition , little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly .
Also , Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation .
He ’ s been a physician for 30 years .
He ’ s president of the BPA , a member of the ESP ’ s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia .
On top of that , there ’ s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying .
For example , the director of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there ’ s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19 ’ s lethality .
“ COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases , but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection , ” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April .
Adding in another interview : Also , one of us ( Rosemary ) and another journalist , Amory Devereux , documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease .
We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19 .
Nor has the virus has been isolated , reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness .
In addition , in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists , Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter , added to the evidence that “ the existence of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not fact.
” The pair also confirmed “ there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [ deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus ] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.
” Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that : Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus ( presenting as interstitial pneumonia ) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases .
Another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pointed to above , the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines , serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost .
In fact , there is no solid evidence the virus exists .
Dr. Alexov made still more important points .
For example , he noted that , in contrast to the seasonal influenza , SARS-CoV-2 hasn ’ t been proven to kill youth : Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people deemed to have died from COVID-19 .
As a result , reported Dr. Alexov , by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria .
Also , the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19 .
He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe , as well as in China , Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone : Drs .
Alexov and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns , combined with the emptying of hospitals ( ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients ) , halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments .
They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19 .
In addition , posited Dr. Alexov , as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians .
We emailed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why he believes it ’ s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.e He didn ’ t answer the questions directly .
Dr. Alexov instead responded : We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov ’ s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov ’ s revelations .
We followed up by telephone with two of them .
None responded .
Why didn ’ t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions ?
We doubt it ’ s due to lack of English proficiency .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on pathologists to follow the WHO ’ s directives and not speak out publicly .
( And , on top of that , pathology departments depend on governments for their funding . )
Nonetheless , pathologists like Drs .
Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection .
Perhaps that ’ s because pathologists ’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests , signs and symptoms .
And there is no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.
Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.
Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.
He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.
These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.
They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).
Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).
And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.
Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.
The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.
We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.
Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.
The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.
Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.
It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.
In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.
But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.
Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.
On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.
For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.
“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:
In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”
Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.
These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.
In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”
The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”
Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:
“the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”
He added that:
“What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”
Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.
Another revelation of his is that:
“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”
As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.
Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:
[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”
(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)
Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:
“the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”
Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.
Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.
“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”
He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:
“I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”
(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)
Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.
They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.
“We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”
In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.
“Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”
We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.e
He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:
We also emailed five of Dr. Alexov’s colleagues in the European Pathology Society asking them to confirm Dr. Alexov’s revelations. We followed up by telephone with two of them. None responded.
Why didn’t Dr. Alexov or his five colleagues answer our questions?
We doubt it’s due to lack of English proficiency.
It’s more likely because of the pressure on pathologists to follow the WHO’s directives and not speak out publicly. (And, on top of that, pathology departments depend on governments for their funding.)
Nonetheless, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.
Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.
Learn more at www.QuestioningCovid.com


renegadetribune--2020-07-06--jewish “Artist” Caitlin Cook Sings “White Babies Are the Ugliest Babies”

On her website she has this quote : Oh my goodness , you ’ re like a female Adam Sandler @ @ @ @ @ , and , like , you ’ re Jewish !
” – Drunk girl in @ @ @ @ @ someone being able to play shows and sing about how ugly jewish babies or black @ @ @ @ @ yet another genocidal jew .

On her website she has this quote:
Oh my goodness, you’re like a female Adam Sandler because your songs are hilarious, and, like, you’re Jewish!” – Drunk girl in Texas
Could you even imagine someone being able to play shows and sing about how ugly jewish babies or black babies are? This is yet another genocidal jew.
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt