renegadetribune--2020-03-07--It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt6

It’s a HOLOHOAX (Don’t Be Fooled) Pt6

Note- “ IT ’ S A HOLOHOAX ( don ’ t be fooled ) ” are series of blog posts that thoroughly expose the Jewish Holocaust lie .
There were “ Nazi Death Camps ” and “ Nazi Gas Chambers ” .
You have been fooled !
This is your opportunity to break free of the mind control you have been taught in school and in the media .
You have been deceived !
We all have… but never again .
It has been said that it is easier to believe a lie one has heard a hundred times , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before .
We have heard 6 million lies about the “ Holocaust ” .
The truth about the Holohoax has been hidden .
Read below to uncover the cover-up !
Note : This blog series is derived from “ Did Six Million Really Die ?
” book by Richard E. Harwood ( 1974 ) with many additional sources , originally presented in DJ Noble Protagonist ’ s E-book ( The Battle to preserve Western Civilization ) : https : //archive.org/details/ @ nobleprotagonist When people talk about the millions of people being killed during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to forget that the cremation process is the most important part of the equation .
If the cremations didn ’ t keep up with the alleged deaths then testimonies of those “ survivors ” are thus invalid .
They indeed proved to be “ invalid ” .
It was a Holohoax !
Ivan Legace , a professional crematologist , testified , on April 5 & 6th , at the 1985 trial of Ernst Zundel , in Canada .
According to his testimony , which included detailing the cremation process , Legace explained… -The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the hottest , and therefore , the fastest crematory in operation in North America , with the capacity to cremate one adult human body in a minimum time of an hour and a half , under optimum circumstances .
Children took much less time to cremate simply because of their smaller size .
-The refractory tiles used on the floor of the ignition chamber tended to wear out very quickly , because of the wear and tear of the rollers , and because this was where the fuel ignited & burned .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ floor titles after only 250 cremations by using metal rollers .
Once the wear started it was extremely difficult to stop .
To repair the unit in such circumstances the operator had to cease operation of the retort , allow the machine 48 hours of cooling down time with the door fully open , and preferably with a fan flowing through the machine .
The bricks or tiling then had to be removed and new ones cemented .
The average life expectancy of floor refractory was 1,500 cremations .
The bricks of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rated for 3,000 cremations , while the bricks of the after-burn chamber were rated for roughly 2,000 cremations .
-The time to cremate a human being , the cremation cycle , took an average of two hours .
After the first cremation of the day was completed , the operator must let the retort cool-down for a minimum of one hour before beginning the second case .
After the second cremation , a cool-down period of at least two hours was required .
Even with cool-down times , Lagacé testified that cremations could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day , round the clock , day after day… The refractory will not tolerate it.
” -Factory recommendation for normal operation was a maximum of three cases per day in a normal eight hour work day .
No more than 50-60 cases should be processed in any month so that the refractory life was prolonged .
That was an average of 2 cases a day .
There was no way to speed up this process , Lagacé testified , without effecting the refractory brick and endangering the life of the operator .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the temperature would go out of control and probably exceed the 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit rated for the bricks .
This would cause excessive spalling , or flaking , of the bricks .
Secondly , the operator could not safely open a retort having an internal temperature of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit .
Lagacé emphasized the real dangers involved if the cool-down periods were not followed .
If an operator attempted to introduce a body into the retort when temperatures were still excessive , a “ flash ignition ” could occur whereby the body @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the retort .
In such a case , the operator would be engulfed in flames from the burning body and would be unable to close the door to the retort .
To put it simply , he said , “ You can basically walk away and watch your building burn down.
” -Lagacé testified that the plans for the Birkenau ( Auschwitz-Birkenau ) crematory indicated that it had been built to almost the exact specifications of the Bow Valley Crematorium .
In Lagacé ’ s opinion , the rate of burn of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but not more than his own unit in Calgary .
The only technology difference that Lagacé could see between his own crematory and those of Birkenau was the burner section .
Lagacé ’ s crematory used a natural gas burner while Birkenau used a stoking system with coal or something of a similar nature .
The technology of Lagacé ’ s crematory allowed him to shut the gas off for cooling .
Coal was very cumbersome in that regard , and this would affect the time limit , since the operator could not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
-Lagacé was shown a photograph of one of the Birkenau crematories taken during the war and asked if the units looked familiar to his own crematory .
Lagacé agreed that they were .
He indicated , however , that the Birkenau retorts had been built in units of three with common walls between them .
This would have eliminated the need for extra bricks , and been much easier & quicker to construct .
However , he noted , “ should one of these need to be maintained or need any repairs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the other two ( retorts ) attached to it , because you can ’ t have temperatures of 2,000 degrees radiating into an area where you ’ re working on another retort.
” Lagacé believed that this design would never be used in a modern crematory simply because , as a business , it could not afford to have a shutdown of three units if one broke down .
-Lagacé was asked to comment on the ( Jewish ) claims made by Raul Hilberg in “ The Destruction of the European Jews ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 46 retorts in the four crematories at Birkenau .
Hilberg claimed that the theoretical daily capacity of the four Birkenau crematoria was somewhat over 4,400 , but , with breakdowns & slowdowns , the practical limit was almost always lower .
Lagacé stated that this claim was “ preposterous ” and “ beyond the realm of reality.
” To claim that 46 retorts could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was “ ludicrous.
” Based on his own experience , Lagacé testified that it would only have been possible to cremate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Birkenau .
-Lagacé was asked to comment on the ( Jewish ) claims by Gerald Reitlinger & Olga Lengyel .
Reitlinger , who written one of the first Jewish-approved comprehensive histories of the “ Holocaust ” in 1953 , wrote that 6,000 people were cremated a day .
This would mean a total , by October 1944 , of over 5 million cremations .
Even more preposterous , Lengyel in her book , “ Five Chimneys ” , claiming to be a former Jewish inmate of Auschwitz , asserted that the camp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hour , or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift.
” Lengyel also alleges that , in addition , 8,000 people were burned every day in the “ death-pits ” , and that therefore , “ In round numbers , about 24,000 corpses were handled every day.
” This , of course , would mean a yearly rate of over 8.5 million .
Thus between March 1942 and October 1944 Auschwitz would finally have disposed of over 21 million people , six million more than the entire world Jewish population .
Lagacé testified that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1,000 bodies , the figures cited by Reitlinger & Lengyel were not realistic .
He testified , “ This doesn ’ t even begin to enter reality at all .
It ’ s just physically unrealistic.
” Lagacé said that even with present ( 1985 ) disaster plans , which provide for massive mobilization and the handling of large numbers of human remains , it would be “ unimaginable ” to cremate such numbers .
-Lagacé referred to the 1985 issue of a statistical sheet compiled yearly by the Cremation Association of North @ @ @ @ @ @ @ located on the continent and the number of cremations done annually .
The statistics indicated that in 1985 , there were a total of 338,370 bodies cremated in 931 crematories in North America .
In Canada alone , a total of 49,216 cremations were performed in 94 crematories .
-Lagacé testified that he had observed the results of burning people in the open in a case involving a homicide where the murderer had attempted to burn the remains of his victim with gasoline in an open area in the woods of northern Ontario @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so .
Human bodies did not burn completely in open spaces .
In 90 percent of the cases , it would be the epidermis , or the skin , that would be charred ; maybe perhaps the limbs would be burnt , but the torso was very difficult to cremate .
It took high temperatures over a prolonged period of time in order to fully cremate a human being .
Moreover , an open air burning would require far more fuel .
In a retort there was a controlled optimum atmosphere .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it was very difficult to concentrate all the heat into one area .
-Regarding the decomposition of corpses and handling of typhus-infected corpses , Lagacé described the procedures enforced by the Alberta government in the case of corpses infected with typhus .
If the body was buried , it had to be encased in a hermetically sealed container which would last over a prolonged period of time ; and only when the soil conditions allowed this , in order to avoid contamination of the water-table or underground streams .
Note : By @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ground water level at the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp , which had fallen at the beginning of the year , had risen again .
This is evident in a telegram from SS-Obersturmfuhrer , Werner Jothann , to Kammler , dated June 2 , 1944 .
Jothann refused approval , on hygienic grounds , for the use of 14 barracks located in Building Segment III of Birkenau Camp .
He said , “ The barracks are only partly covered , the terrain is marshy , and not leveled in any way .
There is a danger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the creation of other hotbeds of epidemics.
” Several thousand camp inmates did die in the chaotic final months of the war , due to disease & malnourishment .
Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen , Germany , the official International Red Cross ( IRC ) records reveal the actual Concentration Camps total death toll was 271,301 , which includes the Jews .
The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “ Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Switzerland , in 1948 .
This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications , “ Sur L ’ activite ’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 ” ( Geneva , 1946 ) & “ Inter Arma Caritas : The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War ” ( Geneva , 1947 ) .
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the Axis German camps .
They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Allied Russian camps ( gulags @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The German camps held both political prisoners and those convicted of crimes .
The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food , medicine and clothing to the prisoners .
Regarding the Theresienstadt camp , the International Committee of the Red Cross ( ICRC ) said , “ ” There were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries , was a relatively privileged ghetto… The Committee ’ s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt ( Terezin ) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich… These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy.
” The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu , of Fascist Rumania , where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation .
The aid then ceased and the Red Cross complained bitterly that it never succeeded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” .
The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “ liberation ” by the Russians .
The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation , when many of the internees were evacuated westward .
But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile .
However , food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such Axis camps as Buchenwald & Oranienburg .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war .
The ICRC reported , “ In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war , the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.
” The International Red Cross was quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased , due to the Allied bombing of German transportation , and in the interests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ March 15th , 1944 against “ the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies.
” In dealing with this comprehensive , three-volume Report , it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of “ gas chambers ” .
The original 1946 edition did not even talk of “ extermination ” or “ death camps ” , but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled ( pressured ) to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several , very vague cursory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ extermination camps ” .
However , no means ( proof ) of “ extermination ” is indicated .
It was a Holohoax !
In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a “ gas chamber ” .
It acknowledges that Jews , like many other wartime nationalities , suffered rigors & privations , but its complete silence on the subject of “ gassings ” is ample refutation of the “ Holocaust ” legend .
Volume III of the Report of the ICRC , Chapter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given to the Jewish section of the free population ” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps but remained , subject to certain restrictions , as part of the free civilian population .
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews in German-controlled territory avoid internment altogether , but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war , generally by way of Hungary , Rumania and Turkey .
Ironically , post-war Jewish emigration from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reich , as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation .
The ICRC reports , “ The Jews from Poland who , whilst in France , had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities , who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries.
” As future U.S. citizens , these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France @ @ @ @ @ @ @ European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities .
“ Until March 1944 , ” says the Red Cross Report , “ Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary.
” Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 , following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union , with a government more dependent on German authority , the emigration of Jews continued .
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “ to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emigration of Jews from Hungary ” .
The U.S. Government gave the ICRC a message stating that the Government of the United States “ now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave.
” The ICRC report demonstrates conclusively that throughout the war the camps were well administered .
The working inmates received a daily ration , even throughout 1943 and 1944 , of not less than 2,750 calories , which was more than double @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the years after 1945 .
The camp inmates were under regular medical care and those who became seriously ill were transferred to hospital .
All inmates , unlike those in Soviet camps , could receive parcels of food , clothing and pharmaceutical supplies from the Special Relief Division of the Red Cross .
SS Judge , Dr. Konrad Morgen , of the Reich Criminal Police Office , testified at Nuremberg that he discussed confidentially with hundreds of inmates the prevailing conditions in the camps .
He found few that were under-nourished except @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pace & achievement in compulsory labor by inmates was far lower than among German civilian workers .
The anti-National Socialist , Communist leader , Ernst Ruff , testified in his Nuremberg affidavit of April 18th , 1947 , that the treatment of prisoners on the work details and in the camp of Dachau remained humane .
The Polish underground leader , Jan Piechowiak , who was at Dachau from May 22 , 1940 until April 29 , 1945 , also testified that prisoners there received good treatment , and that the SS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disciplined ” .
Berta Schirotschin , who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war , testified that the working inmates , until the beginning of 1945 and despite increasing privation in Germany , received their customary second breakfast at 10 AM , every morning .
In general , hundreds of affidavits from Nuremberg testify to the humane conditions prevailing in concentration camps ; but emphasis was invariably laid on those which reflected badly on the German administration and could be used for propaganda purposes .
A study of the documents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their deportation & internment in prison camps tended to greatly exaggerate the rigors of their condition , whereas other nationals interned for political reasons , such as those cited above , generally presented a more balanced picture .
In many cases , prisoners , such as Charlotte Bormann , whose experiences did not accord with the picture presented at Nuremberg , were not permitted to testify .
Note : The Germans did “ not ” use fluoride in the drinking water at concentration camps , or other places during World War 2 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ myths floating around the Internet and repeated by half-truthers , like the Alex Jones show of InfoWars .
There is no proof !
Just another Holohoax !
Note : The stories of Dr. Mengele , named “ Angel of Death ” , and his murderous medical experiments relied primarily on the testimony & memoirs of one man & Jewish prisoner , Miklos Nyiszli .
There was actual no documentation or proof that Dr. Mengele or anyone in his charge murdered anyone .
The German “ Office of the Public Prosecutor ” conducted thorough @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and those found innocent were released ; those found guilty , as well as those deportees convicted of major crimes within the camps , were sentenced by military courts & executed .
In the Federal Archives of Koblenz there is a directive of January , 1943 , from Heinrich Himmler , regarding such executions , stressing that “ no brutality is to be allowed.
” Occasionally there was brutality , but such cases were immediately scrutinized by SS Judge , Dr. Konrad Morgen , of the Reich Criminal Police Office , whose job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ camps .
Morgen himself prosecuted commander Koch of Buchenwald in 1943 for excesses at his camp , a trial to which the German public was invited .
It is significant that Oswald Pohl , the administrator of the concentration camp system who was dealt with so harshly at Nuremberg , was in favor of the death penalty for Koch .
In fact , the SS court did sentence Koch to death but he was given the option of serving on the Russian front .
Before he could do this , however , Prince @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the district , carried out his execution .
This case is ample proof of the seriousness with which the SS regarded unnecessary brutality .
Several SS court actions of this kind were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses and more than 800 cases were investigated before 1945 .

Note- “IT’S A HOLOHOAX (don’t be fooled)” are series of blog posts that thoroughly expose the Jewish Holocaust lie. There were no “Nazi Death Camps” and no “Nazi Gas Chambers”. You have been fooled! This is your opportunity to break free of the mind control you have been taught in school and in the media. You have been deceived! We all have… but never again.
It has been said that it is easier to believe a lie one has heard a hundred times, than a truth one has never heard before. We have heard 6 million lies about the “Holocaust”. The truth about the Holohoax has been hidden. Read below to uncover the cover-up!
Note: This blog series is derived from “Did Six Million Really Die?” book by Richard E. Harwood (1974) with many additional sources, originally presented in DJ Noble Protagonist’s E-book (The Battle to preserve Western Civilization): https://archive.org/details/@nobleprotagonist
Note: Core reference material: https://holocausthandbooks.com/
Also in German: http://holocausthandbuecher.com/
THE TRUTH ABOUT CREMATIONS
When people talk about the millions of people being killed during the “Holocaust”, they seem to forget that the cremation process is the most important part of the equation. If the cremations didn’t keep up with the alleged deaths then testimonies of those “survivors” are thus invalid. They indeed proved to be “invalid”. It was a Holohoax!
Ivan Legace, a professional crematologist, testified, on April 5 & 6th, at the 1985 trial of Ernst Zundel, in Canada.
According to his testimony, which included detailing the cremation process, Legace explained…
-The Bow Valley Crematorium, his facility, was the hottest, and therefore, the fastest crematory in operation in North America, with the capacity to cremate one adult human body in a minimum time of an hour and a half, under optimum circumstances. Children took much less time to cremate simply because of their smaller size.
-The refractory tiles used on the floor of the ignition chamber tended to wear out very quickly, because of the wear and tear of the rollers, and because this was where the fuel ignited & burned. Lagacé, himself, had worn out floor titles after only 250 cremations by using metal rollers. Once the wear started it was extremely difficult to stop. To repair the unit in such circumstances the operator had to cease operation of the retort, allow the machine 48 hours of cooling down time with the door fully open, and preferably with a fan flowing through the machine. The bricks or tiling then had to be removed and new ones cemented.
The average life expectancy of floor refractory was 1,500 cremations. The bricks of the retort’s walls & ceilings were rated for 3,000 cremations, while the bricks of the after-burn chamber were rated for roughly 2,000 cremations.
-The time to cremate a human being, the cremation cycle, took an average of two hours. After the first cremation of the day was completed, the operator must let the retort cool-down for a minimum of one hour before beginning the second case. After the second cremation, a cool-down period of at least two hours was required.
Even with cool-down times, Lagacé testified that cremations could not be done “24 hours a day, round the clock, day after day… The refractory will not tolerate it.”
-Factory recommendation for normal operation was a maximum of three cases per day in a normal eight hour work day. No more than 50-60 cases should be processed in any month so that the refractory life was prolonged. That was an average of 2 cases a day.
There was no way to speed up this process, Lagacé testified, without effecting the refractory brick and endangering the life of the operator. If no cool-down period was allowed between cremations, the temperature would go out of control and probably exceed the 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit rated for the bricks. This would cause excessive spalling, or flaking, of the bricks. Secondly, the operator could not safely open a retort having an internal temperature of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
Lagacé emphasized the real dangers involved if the cool-down periods were not followed. If an operator attempted to introduce a body into the retort when temperatures were still excessive, a “flash ignition” could occur whereby the body would ignite before it was fully introduced into the retort. In such a case, the operator would be engulfed in flames from the burning body and would be unable to close the door to the retort. To put it simply, he said, “You can basically walk away and watch your building burn down.”
-Lagacé testified that the plans for the Birkenau (Auschwitz-Birkenau) crematory indicated that it had been built to almost the exact specifications of the Bow Valley Crematorium. In Lagacé’s opinion, the rate of burn of the Birkenau unit would be as efficient but not more than his own unit in Calgary.
The only technology difference that Lagacé could see between his own crematory and those of Birkenau was the burner section. Lagacé’s crematory used a natural gas burner while Birkenau used a stoking system with coal or something of a similar nature. The technology of Lagacé’s crematory allowed him to shut the gas off for cooling. Coal was very cumbersome in that regard, and this would affect the time limit, since the operator could not go through a cooling cycle as quickly.
-Lagacé was shown a photograph of one of the Birkenau crematories taken during the war and asked if the units looked familiar to his own crematory. Lagacé agreed that they were. He indicated, however, that the Birkenau retorts had been built in units of three with common walls between them. This would have eliminated the need for extra bricks, and been much easier & quicker to construct. However, he noted, “should one of these need to be maintained or need any repairs, it would necessitate the shutdown of the other two (retorts) attached to it, because you can’t have temperatures of 2,000 degrees radiating into an area where you’re working on another retort.”Lagacé believed that this design would never be used in a modern crematory simply because, as a business, it could not afford to have a shutdown of three units if one broke down.
-Lagacé was asked to comment on the (Jewish) claims made by Raul Hilberg in “The Destruction of the European Jews”, with respect to the capacities of the 46 retorts in the four crematories at Birkenau. Hilberg claimed that the theoretical daily capacity of the four Birkenau crematoria was somewhat over 4,400, but, with breakdowns & slowdowns, the practical limit was almost always lower.
Lagacé stated that this claim was “preposterous” and “beyond the realm of reality.” To claim that 46 retorts could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was “ludicrous.” Based on his own experience, Lagacé testified that it would only have been possible to cremate a maximum of 184 bodies a day at Birkenau.
-Lagacé was asked to comment on the (Jewish) claims by Gerald Reitlinger & Olga Lengyel.
Reitlinger, who written one of the first Jewish-approved comprehensive histories of the “Holocaust” in 1953, wrote that 6,000 people were cremated a day. This would mean a total, by October 1944, of over 5 million cremations.
Even more preposterous, Lengyel in her book, “Five Chimneys”, claiming to be a former Jewish inmate of Auschwitz, asserted that the camp cremated no less than “720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift.” Lengyel also alleges that, in addition, 8,000 people were burned every day in the “death-pits”, and that therefore, “In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled every day.” This, of course, would mean a yearly rate of over 8.5 million. Thus between March 1942 and October 1944 Auschwitz would finally have disposed of over 21 million people, six million more than the entire world Jewish population.
Lagacé testified that from his own experience in cremating approximately 1,000 bodies, the figures cited by Reitlinger & Lengyel were not realistic. He testified, “This doesn’t even begin to enter reality at all. It’s just physically unrealistic.”
Lagacé said that even with present (1985) disaster plans, which provide for massive mobilization and the handling of large numbers of human remains, it would be “unimaginable” to cremate such numbers.
-Lagacé referred to the 1985 issue of a statistical sheet compiled yearly by the Cremation Association of North America, showing the numbers of retorts located on the continent and the number of cremations done annually.
The statistics indicated that in 1985, there were a total of 338,370 bodies cremated in 931 crematories in North America. In Canada alone, a total of 49,216 cremations were performed in 94 crematories.
-Lagacé testified that he had observed the results of burning people in the open in a case involving a homicide where the murderer had attempted to burn the remains of his victim with gasoline in an open area in the woods of northern Ontario. He had been unable to do so. Human bodies did not burn completely in open spaces.
In 90 percent of the cases, it would be the epidermis, or the skin, that would be charred; maybe perhaps the limbs would be burnt, but the torso was very difficult to cremate. It took high temperatures over a prolonged period of time in order to fully cremate a human being. Moreover, an open air burning would require far more fuel. In a retort there was a controlled optimum atmosphere. In open air, heat constantly escaped so that it was very difficult to concentrate all the heat into one area.
-Regarding the decomposition of corpses and handling of typhus-infected corpses, Lagacé described the procedures enforced by the Alberta government in the case of corpses infected with typhus.
If the body was buried, it had to be encased in a hermetically sealed container which would last over a prolonged period of time; and only when the soil conditions allowed this, in order to avoid contamination of the water-table or underground streams.
Note: By the early summer of 1944, the ground water level at the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, which had fallen at the beginning of the year, had risen again. This is evident in a telegram from SS-Obersturmfuhrer, Werner Jothann, to Kammler, dated June 2, 1944. Jothann refused approval, on hygienic grounds, for the use of 14 barracks located in Building Segment III of Birkenau Camp. He said, “The barracks are only partly covered, the terrain is marshy, and not leveled in any way. There is a danger of pollution of the ground water and the creation of other hotbeds of epidemics.”
RED CROSS REPORT EXPOSES THE HOLOCAUST
Several thousand camp inmates did die in the chaotic final months of the war, due to disease & malnourishment.
Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the official International Red Cross (IRC) records reveal the actual Concentration Camps total death toll was 271,301, which includes the Jews.
The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War” published in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications, “Sur L’activite’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945” (Geneva, 1946) & “Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War” (Geneva, 1947).
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the Axis German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Allied Russian camps (gulags) which were extremely harsh & deadly.
The German camps held both political prisoners and those convicted of crimes. The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the prisoners.
Regarding the Theresienstadt camp, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said, “”There were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto… The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions… From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich… These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy.”
The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu, of Fascist Rumania, where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation.
The aid then ceased and the Red Cross complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia”. The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians.
The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.
However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such Axis camps as Buchenwald & Oranienburg.
One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war. The ICRC reported, “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.”
The International Red Cross was quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased, due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies.”
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of “gas chambers”.
The original 1946 edition did not even talk of “extermination” or “death camps”, but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled (pressured) to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very vague cursory references to “death camps” & “extermination camps”. However, no means (proof) of “extermination” is indicated. It was a Holohoax!
In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a “gas chamber”. It acknowledges that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigors & privations, but its complete silence on the subject of “gassings” is ample refutation of the “Holocaust” legend.
Volume III of the Report of the ICRC, Chapter 3, deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population.
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews in German-controlled territory avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation.
The ICRC reports, “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries.”
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary.” Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944, following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union, with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary”. The U.S. Government gave the ICRC a message stating that the Government of the United States “now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave.”
The ICRC report demonstrates conclusively that throughout the war the camps were well administered.
The working inmates received a daily ration, even throughout 1943 and 1944, of not less than 2,750 calories, which was more than double the average civilian ration in occupied Germany in the years after 1945.
The camp inmates were under regular medical care and those who became seriously ill were transferred to hospital. All inmates, unlike those in Soviet camps, could receive parcels of food, clothing and pharmaceutical supplies from the Special Relief Division of the Red Cross.
HUMAN CONDITIONS AT THE CAMPS
SS Judge, Dr. Konrad Morgen, of the Reich Criminal Police Office, testified at Nuremberg that he discussed confidentially with hundreds of inmates the prevailing conditions in the camps. He found few that were under-nourished except in the hospitals, and noted that the pace & achievement in compulsory labor by inmates was far lower than among German civilian workers.
The anti-National Socialist, Communist leader, Ernst Ruff, testified in his Nuremberg affidavit of April 18th, 1947, that the treatment of prisoners on the work details and in the camp of Dachau remained humane.
The Polish underground leader, Jan Piechowiak, who was at Dachau from May 22, 1940 until April 29, 1945, also testified that prisoners there received good treatment, and that the SS personnel at the camp were “well disciplined”.
Berta Schirotschin, who worked in the food service at Dachau throughout the war, testified that the working inmates, until the beginning of 1945 and despite increasing privation in Germany, received their customary second breakfast at 10 AM, every morning.
In general, hundreds of affidavits from Nuremberg testify to the humane conditions prevailing in concentration camps; but emphasis was invariably laid on those which reflected badly on the German administration and could be used for propaganda purposes.
A study of the documents also reveals that Jewish witnesses who resented their deportation & internment in prison camps tended to greatly exaggerate the rigors of their condition, whereas other nationals interned for political reasons, such as those cited above, generally presented a more balanced picture. In many cases, prisoners, such as Charlotte Bormann, whose experiences did not accord with the picture presented at Nuremberg, were not permitted to testify.
Note: The Germans did “not” use fluoride in the drinking water at concentration camps, or other places during World War 2. This is just one of the many myths floating around the Internet and repeated by half-truthers, like the Alex Jones show of InfoWars. There is no proof! Just another Holohoax!
Note: The stories of Dr. Mengele, named “Angel of Death”, and his murderous medical experiments relied primarily on the testimony & memoirs of one man & Jewish prisoner, Miklos Nyiszli. There was actual no documentation or proof that Dr. Mengele or anyone in his charge murdered anyone.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AT THE CAMPS
The German “Office of the Public Prosecutor” conducted thorough investigations into each case of criminal arrest and those found innocent were released; those found guilty, as well as those deportees convicted of major crimes within the camps, were sentenced by military courts & executed.
In the Federal Archives of Koblenz there is a directive of January, 1943, from Heinrich Himmler, regarding such executions, stressing that “no brutality is to be allowed.”
Occasionally there was brutality, but such cases were immediately scrutinized by SS Judge, Dr. Konrad Morgen, of the Reich Criminal Police Office, whose job was to investigate irregularities at the various camps. Morgen himself prosecuted commander Koch of Buchenwald in 1943 for excesses at his camp, a trial to which the German public was invited.
It is significant that Oswald Pohl, the administrator of the concentration camp system who was dealt with so harshly at Nuremberg, was in favor of the death penalty for Koch. In fact, the SS court did sentence Koch to death but he was given the option of serving on the Russian front. Before he could do this, however, Prince Waldeck, the leader of the SS in the district, carried out his execution.
This case is ample proof of the seriousness with which the SS regarded unnecessary brutality.
Several SS court actions of this kind were conducted in the camps during the war to prevent excesses and more than 800 cases were investigated before 1945.
Battle for the West (Website): http://www.battleforthewest.com/
Battle for the West (BitChute): https://www.bitchute.com/channel/65cDI4QdHali/
Share now!
Author: DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse. DJ Noble Protagonist (music producer) is a National Socialist & Norse Germanic Pagan of “Nordic” European ancestry, born in the U.S. He has a deep appreciation for ethnic cultures & folkways and has worked with indigenous medicine people (shamans), from many nations, on spiritual efforts to unite the Eagle & Condor (North & South). DJ Noble Protagonist is deeply embedded within the global Hip-Hop community and considers it his duty to fight White Genocide and act as a “Whistleblower” to educate the youth on historical truths that are intentionally being withheld from cross-cultural discourse.


renegadetribune--2020-03-07--The Health Benefits of Ashwagandha

The Health Benefits of Ashwagandha

I was recently introduced to the amazing benefits of ashwagandha root , also sometimes referred to as Indian Ginseng , and since then , have spent considerable time researching the health benefits of this herb .
These days we often hear about “ superfoods ” or “ miracle ” foods and herbs , and it seems every supplement claims to be the best one .
But can they all be the best ?
Ashawagandha just might be !
This herb can treat a wide array of ailments and assist our bodies with many vital functions .
This herb is an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your body tackle stress by lowering cortisol levels , managing fatigue and mental fog , and improving concentration .
These are all things that I have been struggling with , and inevitably what led me to try this herb in the first place .
Once I started taking it , I immediately noticed a difference in how my body was handling stress .
Really , there are too many benefits of ashwagandha to name , so here are just a few of the many it offers , backed by science .
1 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a very important herb in Ayurveda and has been used for over 3,000 years to relieve stress , increase energy levels , and improve concentration .
Ashwagandha has been shown to lower blood sugar levels in several studies .
A test tube study found that it increased insulin secretion and improved insulin sensitivity in muscle cells .
Human studies have shown its ability to reduce blood sugar levels in both diabetics and healthy individuals .
A small study — conducted on just six people with type 2 diabetes and six with high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for 30 days , and found it lowered fasting blood sugar levels just as much as an oral diabetes medication .
Cortisol , otherwise known as the stress hormone , is released in response to stress and low blood sugar .
For many people , cortisol levels become chronically elevated , which can lead to both high blood sugar levels and increased fat storage in the abdomen .
Multiple studies have shown that ashwagandha can help to reduce cortisol levels .
In a controlled study conducted on chronically stressed adults , the group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cortisol levels than the control group .
The group taking the highest dose of the supplement had an average of a 30 % reduction .
From my own experience , I have already noticed this effect , and have found that I no longer get stressed as easily or for as long .
5 .
It May Help Reduce Anxiety Because ashwagandha is best known for its ability to combat stress and bring about a calm , clear state of mind , it also can reduce anxiety levels as well .
One study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on 64 people with chronic stress , showed that those taking ashwagandha reported an average of 69 % reduction in anxiety and insomnia , compared to only 11 % in the placebo group .
And a six-week study showed that 88 % of people who took ashwagandha reported a reduction in their anxiety levels compared to 50 % from those who took a placebo .
6 .
It May Reduce Symptoms of Depression More research needs to be done to provide a solid case for this claim , but preliminary studies have shown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conducted on adults reporting high levels of stress showed that those who took 600 mg per day of ashwagandha reported an astounding 79 % reduction in severe depression .
The placebo group reported a 10 % increase .
7 .
It Can Boost Testosterone and Fertility in Men One study conducted on 75 infertile men showed an increase of sperm count and mobility on the group treated with ashwagandha .
Another study showed that the men who received ashawagandha for stress ended up experiencing higher levels of antioxidants and better sperm quality .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ 14 % of the men ’ s partners had become pregnant .
8 .
It Can Improve Memory and Brain Function Some studies on animals suggest that ashwagandha may reduce memory and brain function issues caused by a disease or injury .
This supplement promotes antioxidant activity and protects nerve cells from free radicals .
One study conducted on epileptic rats found a near complete reversal of spatial memory impairment after being given ashwagandha .
They believe this was a result from a reduction in oxidative stress .
Ashwagandha has been used traditionally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though more research needs to be done on humans to determine whether it does function in this capacity .
In one controlled study , however , researchers gave healthy men a 500 mg supplement daily and noticed significant improvements in their reaction time and task performance compared to men who received only a placebo .
In cases of hypothyroidism , ashwagandha can be used to stimulate the thyroid gland .
One study determined that daily supplementation could increase the secretion of thyroid hormones .
One study showed an increase of muscle mass and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ days of taking between 750-1250 mg of ashwagandha .
Another study showed that those taking the herb had significantly greater gains in muscle strength and size .
They also had more than double the reduction in body fat compared to the placebo group .
This study was relatively small , however , only conducted on 57 young males , so more research needs to be done .
There are many potential benefits to gain from supplementing with ashwagandha .
To determine if it ’ s right for you , be sure to talk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health food store , or your ayurvedic medicine practitioner , to find out the dosage best suited for you and your needs .

I was recently introduced to the amazing benefits of ashwagandha root, also sometimes referred to as Indian Ginseng, and since then, have spent considerable time researching the health benefits of this herb. These days we often hear about “superfoods” or “miracle” foods and herbs, and it seems every supplement claims to be the best one. But can they all be the best? Ashawagandha just might be! This herb can treat a wide array of ailments and assist our bodies with many vital functions.
This herb is an adaptogen, which means that it helps your body tackle stress by lowering cortisol levels, managing fatigue and mental fog, and improving concentration. These are all things that I have been struggling with, and inevitably what led me to try this herb in the first place. Once I started taking it, I immediately noticed a difference in how my body was handling stress.
Really, there are too many benefits of ashwagandha to name, so here are just a few of the many it offers, backed by science.
1. It Is an Ancient Medicinal Herb
Ashwagandha is a very important herb in Ayurveda and has been used for over 3,000 years to relieve stress, increase energy levels, and improve concentration.
2. It Can Reduce Blood Sugar Levels
Ashwagandha has been shown to lower blood sugar levels in several studies. A test tube study found that it increased insulin secretion and improved insulin sensitivity in muscle cells.
Human studies have shown its ability to reduce blood sugar levels in both diabetics and healthy individuals.
A small study — conducted on just six people with type 2 diabetes and six with high cholesterol — had participants supplementing with ashwagandha for 30 days, and found it lowered fasting blood sugar levels just as much as an oral diabetes medication.
3. It Can Reduce Cortisol Levels (Stress Hormone)
Cortisol, otherwise known as the stress hormone, is released in response to stress and low blood sugar. For many people, cortisol levels become chronically elevated, which can lead to both high blood sugar levels and increased fat storage in the abdomen.
Multiple studies have shown that ashwagandha can help to reduce cortisol levels.
In a controlled study conducted on chronically stressed adults, the group given ashwagandha saw significantly greater reductions in cortisol levels than the control group. The group taking the highest dose of the supplement had an average of a 30% reduction.
From my own experience, I have already noticed this effect, and have found that I no longer get stressed as easily or for as long.
5. It May Help Reduce Anxiety
Because ashwagandha is best known for its ability to combat stress and bring about a calm, clear state of mind, it also can reduce anxiety levels as well.
One study, conducted over a 60 day period on 64 people with chronic stress, showed that those taking ashwagandha reported an average of 69% reduction in anxiety and insomnia, compared to only 11% in the placebo group.
And a six-week study showed that 88% of people who took ashwagandha reported a reduction in their anxiety levels compared to 50% from those who took a placebo.
6. It May Reduce Symptoms of Depression
More research needs to be done to provide a solid case for this claim, but preliminary studies have shown promising results.
A controlled 60-day study conducted on adults reporting high levels of stress showed that those who took 600 mg per day of ashwagandha reported an astounding 79% reduction in severe depression. The placebo group reported a 10% increase.
7. It Can Boost Testosterone and Fertility in Men
One study conducted on 75 infertile men showed an increase of sperm count and mobility on the group treated with ashwagandha.
Another study showed that the men who received ashawagandha for stress ended up experiencing higher levels of antioxidants and better sperm quality. After only three months of treatment, 14% of the men’s partners had become pregnant.
8. It Can Improve Memory and Brain Function
Some studies on animals suggest that ashwagandha may reduce memory and brain function issues caused by a disease or injury. This supplement promotes antioxidant activity and protects nerve cells from free radicals.
One study conducted on epileptic rats found a near complete reversal of spatial memory impairment after being given ashwagandha. They believe this was a result from a reduction in oxidative stress.
Ashwagandha has been used traditionally in Ayurvedic medicine to boost memory, though more research needs to be done on humans to determine whether it does function in this capacity. In one controlled study, however, researchers gave healthy men a 500 mg supplement daily and noticed significant improvements in their reaction time and task performance compared to men who received only a placebo.
9. Stimulates the Thyroid Gland
In cases of hypothyroidism, ashwagandha can be used to stimulate the thyroid gland. One study determined that daily supplementation could increase the secretion of thyroid hormones.
10. Promotes Muscle Growth
One study showed an increase of muscle mass and a decrease in fat after just 30 days of taking between 750-1250 mg of ashwagandha.
Another study showed that those taking the herb had significantly greater gains in muscle strength and size. They also had more than double the reduction in body fat compared to the placebo group. This study was relatively small, however, only conducted on 57 young males, so more research needs to be done.
Conclusion
There are many potential benefits to gain from supplementing with ashwagandha. To determine if it’s right for you, be sure to talk to your supplement expert at your local health food store, or your ayurvedic medicine practitioner, to find out the dosage best suited for you and your needs.
This article originally appeared on Collective Evolution.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-07--Israeli Snipers Boast of Shooting Dozens in the Knees During Gaza Protests

( MEMO ) Israeli snipers who participated in the internationally-condemned crackdown on Palestinian protesters in the Gaza Strip have boasted of their actions in interviews with Haaretz .
“ I kept the casing of every round I fired , ” said one former sniper from the Golani infantry brigade .
“ I have them in my room .
So I don ’ t have to make an estimate – I know : 52 definite hits.
” Asked how this compared to others from his battalion , Eden ( not his real name ) replied : “ From the point of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most .
In my battalion they would say : ‘ Look , here comes the killer ’ .
” “ You have to understand that before we showed up , knees were the hardest thing to rack up .
There was a story about one sniper who had 11 knees all told , and people thought no one could outdo him .
And then I brought in seven-eight knees in one day .
Within a few hours , I almost broke his record.
” According to Haaretz , of dozens of snipers approached @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them now discharged from the military – agreed to be interviewed .
Eden boasted of breaking the “ knee record ” during the demonstration on 14 May 2018 .
“ On that day , our pair had the largest number of hits , 42 in all .
My locator wasn ’ t supposed to shoot , but I gave him a break , because we were getting close to the end of our stint , and he didn ’ t have knees , ” he told Haaretz .
“ In the end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that you did something , that you weren ’ t a sniper during exercises only .
So , after I had a few hits , I suggested to him that we switch .
He got around 28 knees there , I ’ d say.
” During Great Return March protests , the Israeli military authorised snipers to target so-called “ main inciters ” , a category which Haaretz noted is defined by “ quite vague ” criteria .
A Golani sniper squad commander claimed : “ It ’ s not so complicated to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ firing up [ the other protesters ] .
You identify him , for example , by the fact that he has his back to you and is facing the crowd .
In many cases , he ’ s also holding a megaphone.
” The snipers spoken to by the paper explained how the chain of command worked during the protests .
“ For every sniper there was a commander at a junior level [ a non-com ] , like me , and also a senior commander – a company commander or a deputy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ .
“ The superior officer would request authorisation to fire from the sector ’ s brigade commander .
He would get on the radio to him and ask : ‘ Can I add another knee for this afternoon ?
’ ” Another sniper , ‘ Daniel ’ , said procedures were more flexible in practice .
“ In general , you had to request authorisation for shooting from your superior officer and he requested authorisation from the company commander or the battalion commander.
” “ If it worked like it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than 10 seconds .
The commanders were not particularly stingy with shooting authorisations .
They would trust you when you said you had identified a justifiable target .
”

(MEMO) Israeli snipers who participated in the internationally-condemned crackdown on Palestinian protesters in the Gaza Strip have boasted of their actions in interviews with Haaretz.
“I kept the casing of every round I fired,” said one former sniper from the Golani infantry brigade. “I have them in my room. So I don’t have to make an estimate – I know: 52 definite hits.”
Asked how this compared to others from his battalion, Eden (not his real name) replied: “From the point of view of hits, I have the most. In my battalion they would say: ‘Look, here comes the killer’.”
“You have to understand that before we showed up, knees were the hardest thing to rack up. There was a story about one sniper who had 11 knees all told, and people thought no one could outdo him. And then I brought in seven-eight knees in one day. Within a few hours, I almost broke his record.”
According to Haaretz, of dozens of snipers approached by the newspaper, six – all of them now discharged from the military – agreed to be interviewed.
Eden boasted of breaking the “knee record” during the demonstration on 14 May 2018.
“On that day, our pair had the largest number of hits, 42 in all. My locator wasn’t supposed to shoot, but I gave him a break, because we were getting close to the end of our stint, and he didn’t have knees,” he told Haaretz.
READ: Israel cop filmed firing at Palestinian children through school gate
“In the end you want to leave with the feeling that you did something, that you weren’t a sniper during exercises only. So, after I had a few hits, I suggested to him that we switch. He got around 28 knees there, I’d say.”
During Great Return March protests, the Israeli military authorised snipers to target so-called “main inciters”, a category which Haaretz noted is defined by “quite vague” criteria.
A Golani sniper squad commander claimed: “It’s not so complicated to figure out who’s organizing and firing up [the other protesters]. You identify him, for example, by the fact that he has his back to you and is facing the crowd. In many cases, he’s also holding a megaphone.”
The snipers spoken to by the paper explained how the chain of command worked during the protests. “For every sniper there was a commander at a junior level [a non-com], like me, and also a senior commander – a company commander or a deputy company commander,” said ‘Amir’.
“The superior officer would request authorisation to fire from the sector’s brigade commander. He would get on the radio to him and ask: ‘Can I add another knee for this afternoon?’”
Another sniper, ‘Daniel’, said procedures were more flexible in practice. “In general, you had to request authorisation for shooting from your superior officer and he requested authorisation from the company commander or the battalion commander.”
“If it worked like it’s supposed to, it could take less than 10 seconds. The commanders were not particularly stingy with shooting authorisations. They would trust you when you said you had identified a justifiable target.”
This article originally appeared on Middle East Monitor.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-08--Post-Coronavirus Future? Injectable Biosensors, A.I. Virus Detection, Robots and a Cashless Society

As a result of the coronavirus , we are witnessing a push towards injectable sensors for virus detection , Orwellian surveillance , A.I .
and robots , as well as a call to quarantine U.S. fiat money coming out of China due to its potential to spread the virus .
Welcome to your new future under the coronavirus !
Whether you think the virus is a hoax ( I don ’ t ) or the reported figures are far more than what ’ s being said , the one thing that will affect us all is the “ solution ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem , reaction , solution ” paradigm .
That being said , these “ solutions ” will be jammed down our throats and suddenly become a new part of everyday society like it has all become in China .
In China , residents are now harassed by drones telling them to “ stay indoors , ” forced quarantines for some , as well as checkpoints for taking their temperatures around transportation stations such as airports and subway screenings .
And while that might seem like a good idea to stop the virus spreading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ignored that our freedoms and liberties are being sacrificed for those implementations .
But I digress , this is communist China were talking about which has essentially become a dictatorship in this writer ’ s opinion , requiring facial recognition to even use the internet , as Activist Post has reported .
However , what happens when that type of Orwellian society comes to the Western world ?
Well , the screening procedures happening in China may come to the U.S. sooner than you may think .
Next year , if the FDA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Profusa and backed by DARPA could help spot new infections weeks before symptoms begin to even show .
The sensor has two parts .
The first is a 3mm string of hydrogel .
Inserted under the skin via syringe , the string is fitted with a specially engineered molecule that changes color when the body begins to fight an infection .
The other part of the device is an electronic component attached to the skin .
The sensor then sends light through the skin , detects if the color change on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the wearer can send to a health care professional or website , etc .
While there are bad solutions like forcefully quarantining or testing people which will only induce more panic , Canadian artificial intelligence firm BlueDot for example warned about the new coronavirus days ahead of the official alerts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization .
This showcases that A.I .
can be used for good and can help humanity besides just being used for evil .
However , if combined with injectable biosensor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s probably not going to be used in the best way possible .
Another thing we are seeing in China where the coronavirus has still hit the worst , robots are being used more and more to deliver food , help those who sick in hospitals and other uses as Yahoo reports .
Although we should never blindly trust artificial intelligence , it could be used to help give us an edge or head start when it comes to potential pandemics/epidemics like COVID-19 is evolving into .
Further , as illustrated above , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dog — man ’ s best friend helping humanity in times of need .
Finally , the Federal Reserve has announced that it ’ s quarantining physical cash coming out of China .
As U Today notes , Bitcoin fixes the issue of a virus being transferred from contact with physical money .
But while cryptocurrency has largely benefited humanity — redistributing the wealth and allowing individuals to be their own banks — the danger lies in government fiat digital currencies .
Unfortunately , we may soon see several governments release fiat digital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transmission of coronavirus , as well as the stock market seemingly ready to implode .
You can check out Activist Post contributor Spiro Skouras ‘ s video on the coming death of physical cash as it relates to the coronavirus outbreak here .
Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post , where this article first appeared .
Support us at Patreon .
Follow us on Minds , Steemit , SoMee , BitChute , Facebook and Twitter .

By Aaron Kesel
As a result of the coronavirus, we are witnessing a push towards injectable sensors for virus detection, Orwellian surveillance, A.I. and robots, as well as a call to quarantine U.S. fiat money coming out of China due to its potential to spread the virus. Welcome to your new future under the coronavirus!
Whether you think the virus is a hoax (I don’t) or the reported figures are far more than what’s being said, the one thing that will affect us all is the “solution” in the grand scheme of the “problem, reaction, solution” paradigm. That being said, these “solutions” will be jammed down our throats and suddenly become a new part of everyday society like it has all become in China.
In China, residents are now harassed by drones telling them to “stay indoors,” forced quarantines for some, as well as checkpoints for taking their temperatures around transportation stations such as airports and subway screenings. And while that might seem like a good idea to stop the virus spreading, ultimately it can’t be ignored that our freedoms and liberties are being sacrificed for those implementations. But I digress, this is communist China were talking about which has essentially become a dictatorship in this writer’s opinion, requiring facial recognition to even use the internet, as Activist Post has reported.
However, what happens when that type of Orwellian society comes to the Western world?
Well, the screening procedures happening in China may come to the U.S. sooner than you may think. Next year, if the FDA approves it, a military biosensor designed by Profusa and backed by DARPA could help spot new infections weeks before symptoms begin to even show. The sensor has two parts. The first is a 3mm string of hydrogel. Inserted under the skin via syringe, the string is fitted with a specially engineered molecule that changes color when the body begins to fight an infection. The other part of the device is an electronic component attached to the skin. The sensor then sends light through the skin, detects if the color change on the string occurs, and generates a signal that the wearer can send to a health care professional or website, etc.
While there are bad solutions like forcefully quarantining or testing people which will only induce more panic, Canadian artificial intelligence firm BlueDot for example warned about the new coronavirus days ahead of the official alerts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. This showcases that A.I. can be used for good and can help humanity besides just being used for evil. However, if combined with injectable biosensor technology backed by DARPA, it’s probably not going to be used in the best way possible.
Another thing we are seeing in China where the coronavirus has still hit the worst, robots are being used more and more to deliver food, help those who sick in hospitals and other uses as Yahoo reports.
Although we should never blindly trust artificial intelligence, it could be used to help give us an edge or head start when it comes to potential pandemics/epidemics like COVID-19 is evolving into. Further, as illustrated above, those little droids can be like a dog — man’s best friend helping humanity in times of need.
Finally, the Federal Reserve has announced that it’s quarantining physical cash coming out of China. As U Today notes, Bitcoin fixes the issue of a virus being transferred from contact with physical money.
But while cryptocurrency has largely benefited humanity — redistributing the wealth and allowing individuals to be their own banks — the danger lies in government fiat digital currencies. Unfortunately, we may soon see several governments release fiat digital currencies due to the concern over the transmission of coronavirus, as well as the stock market seemingly ready to implode.
You can check out Activist Post contributor Spiro Skouras‘s video on the coming death of physical cash as it relates to the coronavirus outbreak here.
**By [@An0nkn0wledge](https://steemit.com/@an0nkn0wledge)**
Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post, where this article first appeared. Support us at Patreon. Follow us on Minds, Steemit, SoMee, BitChute, Facebook and Twitter.
Image: Pixabay
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-08--Auschwitz: The First Gassing – Rumor and Reality

The orthodox history of Auschwitz is known to be based on an order to exterminate the jews of Europe – allegedly sent by Hitler to Himmler in the spring of 1941 and from there to the Auschwitz camp commander Rudolf Höss .
This order is said to have materialized in the construction of the alleged extermination camp of Birkenau .
This order , according to the interpretation that has become canonical , was implemented progressively in four stages : • None In September 1941 the first experimental homicidal gassing was allegedly carried out at Auschwitz using Zyklon B , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” of the chemical weapon for the subsequent mass extermination .
• None At the beginning of 1942 the activity of homicidal gassing is said to have been transferred to the morgue of the crematorium at the Auschwitz Main Camp .
• None In the following months , two houses located outside the Birkenau camp were purportedly converted into homicidal gas chambers ( the so-called “ Bunkers ” ) and began the mass extermination of Jews and sick prisoners .
• None In March 1943 , finally , the extermination activities are claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crematoria of Birkenau , all allegedly equipped with gas chambers .
The first homicidal gassing in the Auschwitz concentration camp was allegedly carried out between September 3 and 5 , 1941 , in the basement of Building ( Block ) 13 .
This building was later named Block 11 because of an administrative change in the numbering of the buildings .
This first gassing is said to have been the starting point of the alleged mass extermination process at Auschwitz .
After having gone through the intermediate stages of the mortuary in Crematorium @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Camp ) and the so-called “ Bunkers ” at Birkenau , this claimed extermination process later led to the alleged homicidal gas chambers of the Birkenau Crematoria II through V. As such , the first homicidal gassing would therefore constitute the birth of the homicidal gas chambers and mark the “ official ” introduction of Zyklon B into the Auschwitz holocaust history .
Moreover , it would also constitute the archetype of the alleged “ selections ” of registered detainees in the camp hospitals for the “ gas chambers.
” The conclusion that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sources we have examined in this study is unambiguous : The first homicidal gassing at Auschwitz in the official reconstruction by Danuta Czech is based solely on contradictory statements of self-styled eyewitnesses and is discounted by the documents .
It therefore has no historical foundation .
The story was invented in October of 1941 by one of the centers for black propaganda within the secret resistance movement at Auschwitz , from the initial idea of an experimentation with undefined combat gases on human beings in an equally undefined “ Bunker ” or “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Auschwitz .
Only later , cued by the disinfestations with Zyklon B that became more and more widespread with the enlargement of the camp , did the propagandists introduce Zyklon B into their tales and place the first gassing in the basement of Block 11 .
The normal removal of corpses of registered detainees who had died in the camp from the Leichenhalle of Block 28 to the crematorium was used to progressively enrich the story .
In 1946 , Judge Jan Sehn , facing the task of historicizing the utterly contradictory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proceedings to be launched , invented the nucleus of the story , which included the canonical literary elements of the number of victims , the various phases of the gassing , but not its date .
In 1959 , Danuta Czech , in an even more daring manipulation of the sources , resurrected and augmented Jan Sehn ’ s story and drew from a mélange of diverging testimonies a purely fictitious “ convergence of proof ” and attributed to it a precise but completely invented date .
: The first gassing had now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” reveals the deceitful tricks used by the inventors of the legend of the first gassing at Auschwitz .
It also speaks volumes about the intellectual laziness of the orthodox Holocaust historians who uncritically accepted this legend and transmogrified it into an “ untouchable historical truth .
”

By Carlo Mattogno
The orthodox history of Auschwitz is known to be based on an order to exterminate the jews of Europe – allegedly sent by Hitler to Himmler in the spring of 1941 and from there to the Auschwitz camp commander Rudolf Höss. This order is said to have materialized in the construction of the alleged extermination camp of Birkenau. This order, according to the interpretation that has become canonical, was implemented progressively in four stages:
In September 1941 the first experimental homicidal gassing was allegedly carried out at Auschwitz using Zyklon B, which is said to represent the “discovery” of the chemical weapon for the subsequent mass extermination. At the beginning of 1942 the activity of homicidal gassing is said to have been transferred to the morgue of the crematorium at the Auschwitz Main Camp. In the following months, two houses located outside the Birkenau camp were purportedly converted into homicidal gas chambers (the so-called “Bunkers”) and began the mass extermination of Jews and sick prisoners. In March 1943, finally, the extermination activities are claimed to have been moved into the four crematoria of Birkenau, all allegedly equipped with gas chambers.
The first homicidal gassing in the Auschwitz concentration camp was allegedly carried out between September 3 and 5, 1941, in the basement of Building (Block) 13. This building was later named Block 11 because of an administrative change in the numbering of the buildings. This first gassing is said to have been the starting point of the alleged mass extermination process at Auschwitz. After having gone through the intermediate stages of the mortuary in Crematorium I of the Stammlager (Auschwitz Main Camp) and the so-called “Bunkers” at Birkenau, this claimed extermination process later led to the alleged homicidal gas chambers of the Birkenau Crematoria II through V. As such, the first homicidal gassing would therefore constitute the birth of the homicidal gas chambers and mark the “official” introduction of Zyklon B into the Auschwitz holocaust history. Moreover, it would also constitute the archetype of the alleged “selections” of registered detainees in the camp hospitals for the “gas chambers.”
The conclusion that emerges from the analyses of the available sources we have examined in this study is unambiguous: The first homicidal gassing at Auschwitz in the official reconstruction by Danuta Czech is based solely on contradictory statements of self-styled eyewitnesses and is discounted by the documents. It therefore has no historical foundation.
The story was invented in October of 1941 by one of the centers for black propaganda within the secret resistance movement at Auschwitz, from the initial idea of an experimentation with undefined combat gases on human beings in an equally undefined “Bunker” or “shelter” or “concrete building” at Auschwitz. Only later, cued by the disinfestations with Zyklon B that became more and more widespread with the enlargement of the camp, did the propagandists introduce Zyklon B into their tales and place the first gassing in the basement of Block 11. The normal removal of corpses of registered detainees who had died in the camp from the Leichenhalle of Block 28 to the crematorium was used to progressively enrich the story.
In 1946, Judge Jan Sehn, facing the task of historicizing the utterly contradictory accounts of the witnesses to enable judicial proceedings to be launched, invented the nucleus of the story, which included the canonical literary elements of the number of victims, the various phases of the gassing, but not its date. In 1959, Danuta Czech, in an even more daring manipulation of the sources, resurrected and augmented Jan Sehn’s story and drew from a mélange of diverging testimonies a purely fictitious “convergence of proof” and attributed to it a precise but completely invented date.: The first gassing had now become “history.”
This “history” reveals the deceitful tricks used by the inventors of the legend of the first gassing at Auschwitz. It also speaks volumes about the intellectual laziness of the orthodox Holocaust historians who uncritically accepted this legend and transmogrified it into an “untouchable historical truth.”
Pages 7, 8, 133
file:///home/chronos/u-17202e3b10259cac245ef0fdffb1b575fcde4624/MyFiles/Downloads/Holohoax%20Handbooks/Vol20AuschwitzThe%20FirstGassing.pdf
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-03-08--Forgotten French Painter Félix-Joseph Barrias

Félix-Joseph Barrias ( 13 September 1822 – 24 January 1907 ) was a French painter .
He was well known @ @ @ @ @ paintings on religious , historical or mythical subjects , but has now been largely forgotten @ @ @ @ @ his studio and went on to achieve fame include Edgar Degas , Gustave Achille Guillaumet @ @ @ @ @ Read the full bio ) Renegade Editor ’ s Note : I could really do @ @ @ @ @ ( aka jewish ) paintings of Barrias , but unfortunately many great artists painted themes @ @ @ @

Félix-Joseph Barrias (13 September 1822 – 24 January 1907) was a French painter. He was well known in his day for his paintings on religious, historical or mythical subjects, but has now been largely forgotten. Artists who trained in his studio and went on to achieve fame include Edgar Degas, Gustave Achille Guillaumet and Henri Pille. (Read the full bio)
Renegade Editor’s Note: I could really do without the “religious” (aka jewish) paintings of Barrias, but unfortunately many great artists painted themes from the Bible.
Death of Chopin Cincinnatus Receives the Deputies of the Senate Jacob Ignaz Hittorff Debarkment at the Port Eugène-Ernest Hillemacher A Gaul and His Daughter Imprisoned in Rome Annointing of David by Samuel Tiberius exiles Camille Desmoulins Olga de Pitray-Ségur Alchetron
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-08--More Coronavirus Censorship: Social Media Companies Partner With WHO

Social media companies have made the decision to partner with “ health authorities ” ( government officials like those who work for the CDC ) to combat “ misinformation ” about the coronavirus .
We all know what this means .
Under the mainstream media ’ s seemingly innocent words lies a rash of new censorship coming down the pipes .
Only the official narrative from those in the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will soon be allowed on social media .
Last week , the social media app TikTok , popular with youths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be partnering with the WHO in an effort to spread “ trusted health info ” on the novel coronavirus , or COVID-19 , in addition to best public health practices .
According to a report by ABC News , WHO posted its first TikTok on Friday .
“ COVID-19 outbreak has seen a massive ‘ infodemic ’ —an over-abundance of information—some accurate and some not—that makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it , ” the WHO told ABC News .
Therefore , WHO is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including TikTok , to help us reach the right audience ( the right community , the right age group , etc . )
, as well as to detect the spread of misinformation on the new coronavirus .
We understand that different platforms might have their specific audience , hence important to make trustworthy information available where people are looking for it .
So , in other words , WHO is asking TikTok to make sure their narrative infects the minds of the young adult and youth audience they are said to attract @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be deemed relevant to this outbreak .
The censorship surrounding this virus is ongoing , but it ’ s becoming obvious authorities are continuing to have problems completing the totalitarian squashing of free speech .
The Chinese have taken to using force to prevent information from getting out .
Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are supporting the “ authority ” on health too and ramming the official narrative down people ’ s throats .
“ We ’ re focused on making sure everyone can access credible and accurate information , ” Facebook CEO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ week .
“ If you search for coronavirus on Facebook , you ’ ll see a pop-up that directs you to the World Health Organization or your local health authority for the latest information.
” We all know this is elitist speak for “ you ’ ll read and hear what we want you to read and hear .
”

By Mac Slavo
Social media companies have made the decision to partner with “health authorities” (government officials like those who work for the CDC) to combat “misinformation” about the coronavirus. We all know what this means. Under the mainstream media’s seemingly innocent words lies a rash of new censorship coming down the pipes.
Only the official narrative from those in the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will soon be allowed on social media. Last week, the social media app TikTok, popular with youths and young adults, announced it would be partnering with the WHO in an effort to spread “trusted health info” on the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, in addition to best public health practices.
According to a report by ABC News, WHO posted its first TikTok on Friday.
we’ve teamed up with @WHO to get you the trusted health info you need pic.twitter.com/If0aqoj9VH — TikTok US (@tiktok_us) February 29, 2020
“COVID-19 outbreak has seen a massive ‘infodemic’—an over-abundance of information—some accurate and some not—that makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it,” the WHO told ABC News.
Therefore, WHO is working with various social media platforms, including TikTok, to help us reach the right audience (the right community, the right age group, etc.), as well as to detect the spread of misinformation on the new coronavirus. We understand that different platforms might have their specific audience, hence important to make trustworthy information available where people are looking for it.
So, in other words, WHO is asking TikTok to make sure their narrative infects the minds of the young adult and youth audience they are said to attract. Only the information from the WHO will be deemed relevant to this outbreak. The censorship surrounding this virus is ongoing, but it’s becoming obvious authorities are continuing to have problems completing the totalitarian squashing of free speech.
The Chinese have taken to using force to prevent information from getting out. Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are supporting the “authority” on health too and ramming the official narrative down people’s throats. “We’re focused on making sure everyone can access credible and accurate information,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement this week. “If you search for coronavirus on Facebook, you’ll see a pop-up that directs you to the World Health Organization or your local health authority for the latest information.”
We all know this is elitist speak for “you’ll read and hear what we want you to read and hear.”
Article source: SHTFPlan.com
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-03-09--Debunking the Bunkers of Auschwitz: Black Propaganda versus History

As I have emphasized in a previous work , the archives of the Auschwitz Central Construction Office , which were preserved in Moscow , allow us to reestablish a complete account of the buildings that were erected in Auschwitz during the first half of 1942 .
Yet neither Pressac nor Robert Jan van Pelt , the new orthodox ‘ expert ’ on Auschwitz , has searched those archives for documentary proof of the homicidal Birkenau ‘ Bunkers , ’ or , shall we say , none of them has found any evidence of their existence .
But common sense dictates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there would be documentary proof of their existence .
The present study , which relies for the most part on unpublished documents , fills this embarrassing gap in the orthodox historiography and supplies us with a solid answer to the question as to whether the alleged homicidal ‘ Bunkers ’ of Birkenau were a historical reality .
If ‘ Bunkers ’ 1 and 2 at Birkenau started functioning on March 20 or at the end of May 1942 , and on June 30 , 1942 , respectively , specific references to those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the documents cited – references such as “ Bunker , ” or “ Rotes Haus ” / “ Weißes Haus ” or some kind of ‘ code word.
’ A thorough examination of all entries in Tables 1 through 17 in the Appendix reveals , however , that not a single entry can even remotely be interpreted as referring to any of these ‘ Bunkers.
’ This clearly indicates that the Birkenau ‘ Bunkers ’ never existed as extermination installations .
For the members of the Auschwitz resistance , the idea of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the disinfestation buildings BWe 5a and 5b ; they projected these installations – showers , gas chambers , ventilation , lids for the ventilation openings – onto the alleged gassing installations , obviously with the appropriate adaptations and distortions , starting with the very term “ Degasungskammer.
” As for the number of the ‘ Bunkers ’ and the ‘ gas chambers ’ they contained , and , more generally , the number of the alleged victims , the Auschwitz propagandists had not yet come to a common decision , so that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This was clearly due to the fact that the various resistance groups then active – that of the Polish socialist party , that of the Union of Military Organizations , the Kampfgruppe Auschwitz , the group directed by Colonel Aleksander Stawarz , Captain Włodzimierz Koliński ’ s group , the one founded by Colonel Jan Karz , Roman Rybarski and Jan Mosdorf ’ s group 215 – spread their propaganda with minimum coordination , if any at all , and each one wanted to surpass the others with their own horrifying stories @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gas chambers ’ in the ‘ Bunkers ’ began to be disseminated in 1942 .
It was spread by various resistance groups in and around Auschwitz , although their respective reports contradicted one another .
These reports were based on the disinfestation plants BWe 5a and 5b .
If the presence of these installations is a necessary element , it is not sufficient to account for the birth of the propaganda story .
The connecting element that would focus the energies of the propagandists was still missing : the mass graves and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exhumed from mass graves , which went on day after day for months on end , struck the imagination of the detainees at Auschwitz , and it was this “ eternal fire ” which inspired the propaganda makers .
If thousands of corpses were burned outside the camp , there must have been mass extermination , and if there was mass extermination , the assumption seemed logical that there were also ‘ gas chambers , ’ equipped , of course , with the “ showers ” and installations similar to those in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That is the origin of the propaganda story of the Birkenau ‘ Bunkers.
’ The inevitable conclusion of this study is that the story of the gassing ‘ Bunkers ’ at Birkenau is a propaganda legend , lacking all foundation in reality .
Two fundamental historiographic consequences derive from this conclusion for any serious historian .
In contrast , the alleged ‘ Bunkers ’ had no designation and corresponded to no building site , and no document of the Central Construction Office contains even the least reference to them .
This means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never taken over by the Central Construction Office and were , therefore , never transformed into ‘ gas chambers .
As we have seen , the story of the Birkenau ‘ Bunkers ’ is a simple propaganda legend , contrived in 1942 by the Auschwitz resistance on the basis of actual events and real structures which , however , had nothing to do with the alleged mass extermination .
In the following years , the legend fed on new and varied literary embellishments .
This process continued even after Szlama Dragon had attempted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so that several dozen apparently ‘ independent ’ variations branched out from the original theme , agreeing only on one element : the existence of alleged homicidal gas chambers in one or more farmhouses outside of the Birkenau camp .
However , the “ convergence of evidence ” of these testimonies , as invoked by van Pelt , relied on a single imaginary and purely propagandistic element ; therefore , despite appearances , they can not regarded as independent either .
Thus , together with the ‘ Bunkers , ’ the methodical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

By Carlo Mattogno
As I have emphasized in a previous work, the archives of the Auschwitz Central Construction Office, which were preserved in Moscow, allow us to reestablish a complete account of the buildings that were erected in Auschwitz during the first half of 1942. Yet neither Pressac nor Robert Jan van Pelt, the new orthodox ‘expert’ on Auschwitz, has searched those archives for documentary proof of the homicidal Birkenau ‘Bunkers,’ or, shall we say, none of them has found any evidence of their existence. But common sense dictates that, if those installations actually existed, there would be documentary proof of their existence.
The present study, which relies for the most part on unpublished documents, fills this embarrassing gap in the orthodox historiography and supplies us with a solid answer to the question as to whether the alleged homicidal ‘Bunkers’ of Birkenau were a historical reality.
If ‘Bunkers’ 1 and 2 at Birkenau started functioning on March 20 or at the end of May 1942, and on June 30, 1942, respectively, specific references to those installations would necessarily have to appear in the documents cited – references such as “Bunker,” or “Rotes Haus” / “Weißes Haus” or some kind of ‘code word.’ A thorough examination of all entries in Tables 1 through 17 in the Appendix reveals, however, that not a single entry can even remotely be interpreted as referring to any of these ‘Bunkers.’ This clearly indicates that the Birkenau ‘Bunkers’ never existed as extermination installations.
For the members of the Auschwitz resistance, the idea of the ‘Bunkers’ was thus definitely inspired by the disinfestation buildings BWe 5a and 5b; they projected these installations – showers, gas chambers, ventilation, lids for the ventilation openings – onto the alleged gassing installations, obviously with the appropriate adaptations and distortions, starting with the very term “Degasungskammer.” As for the number of the ‘Bunkers’ and the ‘gas chambers’ they contained, and, more generally, the number of the alleged victims, the Auschwitz propagandists had not yet come to a common decision, so that their statements on these contradict each other. This was clearly due to the fact that the various resistance groups then active – that of the Polish socialist party, that of the Union of Military Organizations, the Kampfgruppe Auschwitz, the group directed by Colonel Aleksander Stawarz, Captain Włodzimierz Koliński’s group, the one founded by Colonel Jan Karz, Roman Rybarski and Jan Mosdorf’s group 215 – spread their propaganda with minimum coordination, if any at all, and each one wanted to surpass the others with their own horrifying stories.
The black propaganda about the ‘gas chambers’ in the ‘Bunkers’ began to be disseminated in 1942. It was spread by various resistance groups in and around Auschwitz, although their respective reports contradicted one another. These reports were based on the disinfestation plants BWe 5a and 5b. If the presence of these installations is a necessary element, it is not sufficient to account for the birth of the propaganda story. The connecting element that would focus the energies of the propagandists was still missing: the mass graves and the open-air cremations. The incineration of corpses exhumed from mass graves, which went on day after day for months on end, struck the imagination of the detainees at Auschwitz, and it was this “eternal fire” which inspired the propaganda makers. If thousands of corpses were burned outside the camp, there must have been mass extermination, and if there was mass extermination, the assumption seemed logical that there were also ‘gas chambers,’ equipped, of course, with the “showers” and installations similar to those in the gas chambers of BWe 5a and 5B.
That is the origin of the propaganda story of the Birkenau ‘Bunkers.’ The inevitable conclusion of this study is that the story of the gassing ‘Bunkers’ at Birkenau is a propaganda legend, lacking all foundation in reality. Two fundamental historiographic consequences derive from this conclusion for any serious historian.
In contrast, the alleged ‘Bunkers’ had no designation and corresponded to no building site, and no document of the Central Construction Office contains even the least reference to them. This means that the two existing Polish houses were never taken over by the Central Construction Office and were, therefore, never transformed into ‘gas chambers.
As we have seen, the story of the Birkenau ‘Bunkers’ is a simple propaganda legend, contrived in 1942 by the Auschwitz resistance on the basis of actual events and real structures which, however, had nothing to do with the alleged mass extermination.
In the following years, the legend fed on new and varied literary embellishments. This process continued even after Szlama Dragon had attempted to consolidate it into a unified version, so that several dozen apparently ‘independent’ variations branched out from the original theme, agreeing only on one element: the existence of alleged homicidal gas chambers in one or more farmhouses outside of the Birkenau camp. However, the “convergence of evidence” of these testimonies, as invoked by van Pelt, relied on a single imaginary and purely propagandistic element; therefore, despite appearances, they cannot regarded as independent either.
Thus, together with the ‘Bunkers,’ the methodical keystone of orthodox historiography collapses as well.
file:///home/chronos/u-17202e3b10259cac245ef0fdffb1b575fcde4624/MyFiles/Downloads/Holohoax%20Handbooks/Vol11DebunkingTheBunkersOfAuschwitz.pdf
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician