renegadetribune--2020-11-11--A Postcard from Auschwitz

A Postcard from Auschwitz

The following is a true account of my personal visit to the camp .
All photos are my own .
Krakow is a beautiful city in early summer , the stand-out among southern Polish cities .
Miraculously , the old city center survived both world wars unscathed .
The huge central square is a sight to behold , and with no less than three major universities , Krakow bristles with youthful energy .
Coming down by train from Warsaw , I was able to arrange a two-night stay before continuing on my way to Vienna .
As with most major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ must-see ” sites : St. Mary ’ s Basilica , Wawel Castle , the salt mines , and of course , Auschwitz .
In the background of Photo 4 is Block 24 , the building that housed the brothel and library for ( non-jewish ) inmates ; the main entrance is shown in Photo 5 .
Photo 6 shows a typical view in the camp , of barrack buildings and a guard tower .
So I went to one of the many tourist information offices around town and purchased a standard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The package , which included free pickup and return delivery to my hotel , cost 90 złoty , about $ 30—quite a deal .
My pick-up time was set ( 8:30 am ) , and the van would be at my hotel the next morning , for the “ 6-hour tour.
” Plenty of time to see the place , I thought , given that Oswieçim—the Polish name of Auschwitz—was only some 70 kilometers ( about 40 miles ) from Krakow .
The van dutifully arrived the next morning .
But I soon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the tour was not quite as expected .
The vehicle—a bit larger than I anticipated , more like a small bus—had a capacity of about 25 people .
I was one of the first in , and the driver proceeded to cover much of the city in order to pick up our remaining guests .
But between rush hour traffic , construction delays , and people slow getting out to the bus , a good hour went by before we were even ready to depart Krakow .
So my “ 6-hour tour @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And of course it would require another hour or so to return everyone ; in other words , I was really getting a “ 4-hour tour.
” Not sure that that counts as a “ day trip , ” but such is the life of a tourist in Poland .
( I ’ m no tour planner , but it seemed to me that , if everyone simply walked to the central tourist office and met the bus there , that we could have saved a couple hours… ) It turned out that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tour itself , and , in my suspicious mind , served an ulterior purpose .
But I come to that matter in due course .
There are three distinct and roughly parallel paths from Krakow to Oswieçim : the ( longer ) expressway route , and two cross-country routes via two-lane roads .
In good traffic , as I learned , all three take about one hour—a rather long time for a mere 40 miles .
But Poland has only two kinds of roads : expressways and two-lane roads , and the latter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for one of the scenic country rides .
As soon as we were clear of Krakow city , the driver pulled out a DVD and popped it into a dashboard player .
A small screen above us lit up : this was our complimentary 20-minute documentary about the camp ( in English ) .
No surprises here .
We were treated to the usual recounting of the “ extermination camp ” history , the appalling conditions , the emaciated inmates , the gas chambers , and the “ over one million ” jewish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to say .
The remainder of the trip was uneventful .
The forecasts called for rain that day , but supposedly not until later in the day ; with luck it would hold out for our visit .
Around 10:30 am—a good two hours after my pickup—we rolled into the town of Oswieçim .
It was a typical smallish European town , nicely maintained , with the usual amenities .
We drove only a few minutes through the town when , suddenly , we arrived at the main camp , Auschwitz I .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” is comprised of three primary facilities , and dozens of smaller sub-camps .
The original and main camp is Auschwitz I , also called the Stammlager .
It opened as a National Socialist camp in 1940 , but was originally built by the Polish army as a military barracks complex , apparently during World War I .
This camp allegedly had a single gas chamber , which we were about to see .
But the vast majority of the gassings are said to have occurred at Auschwitz II , known as Birkenau @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day .
The third facility , Auschwitz III ( Monowitz ) , was located some three kilometers from the town , and served as an industrial facility ; no mass murder is alleged to have happened there , and consequently it receives few tourists .
Knowing all this , I was still surprised at how integrated the main camp was into the town .
This , I think , is not the usual image we have : the dreaded “ Auschwitz death camp ” located in the heart of a civilian village .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ this , of course .
Its original function , as a Polish military camp , had nothing to hide .
And even as a German camp , when constructed in 1939 and 1940 , it was not originally intended , even on the traditional view , as an extermination camp .
The Germans were simply making good use of a captured military barracks .
Pulling into the parking lot , we were immediately confronted with a mass of vehicles : passenger cars , taxis , tour buses like our own , and full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The place was a frenzy of activity—see Photos 1 and 2 .
Our bus disembarked , we merged with another small group , and then were assigned a tour guide : a cheerful young woman with a good knowledge of English , and of the standard story she was scripted to present .
We pushed through the mob into the entrance building , past the gift shop , and on into a small alcove .
There we were given our headsets and radio receivers .
It is a rather high-tech affair : with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ multiple languages , the Poles gave the tour guide a radio voice transmitter ; each of us could then hear her speaking through our headsets .
Thus each group heard only their personal guide .
On the one hand , this was a clever and useful solution .
No confusing cross-talk , and even if you drifted away from the group , you could still hear your guide speaking loud and clear .
On the other hand , it had a noticeable ( and to me , suspicious ) side effect : questions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be heard by the group .
They were necessarily individual questions between you and the guide .
When I did this on a couple of occasions , she answered me personally , but shut off the transmitter .
No one else in the group heard either my questions , or the answers .
Very clever , I thought to myself .
Moving into the camp grounds , we immediately came upon the famous “ Arbeit Macht Frei ” sign— “ Work Makes You Free ” ( Photos 3 and 4 ) .
Our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the guide as she made stops in various barracks to tell us stories of the appalling conditions faced by the inmates .
The buildings were mostly empty .
Some contained walls of inmate photos ; others , simulated sleeping bunks .
One final barrack was set up rather as a standard museum .
It had exhibits displaying inmate suitcases , personal items , and hair ( cut from inmates as a precaution against lice ) .
One large glassed-in exhibit showed an apparent mound of “ thousands ” of shoes—though , as Germar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ displayed on an unseen elevated board , which is empty beneath .
This is the same trick that grocers use to display fruit , to give the illusion of a vast quantity .
The mound was not so vast after all .
At one point the guide mentioned the total Auschwitz death count as roughly 1 million jews and thousands of others .
I caught up to her and asked if the toll wasn ’ t previously claimed to be 4 million .
( Microphone off . )
Yes , she said , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1990s had confirmed the new , lower figure .
Any chance it would be lowered still in the future ?
, I asked .
Unlikely , she said .
By this time , people were beginning to talk among themselves about the as-yet-unseen gas chambers .
The guide then reminded us that , indeed , we were about to come to the gas chamber itself .
“ And oh , by the way , ” she added , “ most of the gassings were at Birkenau .
But we ’ ll see that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noon .
Finally we arrived at “ the ” gas chamber in the main camp , also called Krematorium # 1 ( or Krema 1 , for short ) .
It was a partially underground structure with a flat roof and sloping , grassy side walls with large trees—see Photo 7 .
Few statistics were given on the details of the gassings : no start or finish date ( in fact , February to November 1942 ) , no details on the gassing procedure ( Zyklon pellets thrown in through roof vents ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ allegedly gassed there ( about 20,000—a mere two percent of the claimed Auschwitz toll ) .
We could not enter via the “ inmate entrance , ” as this was blocked off ( Photo 8 ) , so we went around to the other side ( Photo 9 ) .
Upon entering the building , we were treated to what must have been the world ’ s shortest tour of a gas chamber .
We walked in , took a hard right turn into a small room , then a hard left into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a windowless , rectangular room , about 25 x 5 meters .
The guide said little more than “ this is the gas chamber , no photos please , ” and then she was off into the adjoining room with the cremation ovens .
Rebel that I am , and not wanting to miss an opportunity , I lagged behind the group and then snapped a quick photo ( # 10 ) .
But the guide was gone—no chance to ask about the many post-war modifications to the room ( chamber size , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about its history as a morgue and an air raid shelter .
No chance to ask how 800 to 1000 people were jammed into that room , nor how the deadly Zyklon pellets were collected up without killing the guards handling the dead bodies .
No chance to ask why the four Zyklon vents appeared to be added later than the original construction .
No chance to ask about French traditionalist Eric Conan ’ s claim that “ everything there is false.
” In the oven room ( Photo 11 ) , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ovens themselves— “ no photos please ” —and our guide was off .
No chance to ask why the reconstructed chimney was not attached to the ovens .
No chance to ask why the six cremation muffles , which could handle six bodies per hour , were such a capacity mismatch with a gas chamber that could kill 800 to 1000 at a shot .
Note : it would have taken roughly 150 hours—or more than 6 days working round the clock—to dispose of all the bodies from a single gassing .
Outside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more relaxed .
Now we have time for a break , for bathrooms , for a visit to the gift shop , she said .
“ Be out front at the bus at 12:30 , for the ride over to Birkenau.
” Finally , I thought—the highlight of the trip .
Again , the “ ride to Birkenau ” was surprising—all of about five minutes .
Out of the small village , across a field , and there we were , at the famous entrance building , complete with train tunnel ( Photo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was beginning to fail me ) .
There we were , at the site of the greatest mass killing in human history : 1.1 million people , the vast majority jews , killed over two years ( 1943 and 1944 ) , 90 percent of whom were gassed in the four crematoria .
I was very anxious to get inside and look around .
Then another surprise .
“ Because we are running late , ” said our guide ( “ late ” ? )
, “ we will only have time to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the barracks .
Unfortunately we won ’ t be able to see the gas chambers.
” What ?
!
You must be kidding me , lady !
No gas chambers ?
!
Like hell !
, I said to myself .
“ How much time do we have until the bus leaves ?
, ” I asked our guide .
“ About 25 minutes.
” “ I ’ m going to the gas chambers.
” “ Ok , ” she said as she headed off with the group .
I didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back to Krakow ; I was going to see the Birkenau gas chambers .
Inside the main gate , one sees the train tracks going out into the distance , to a dead end , and flanked by guard towers and a loading area ( Photo 13 ) .
Being familiar with the camp layout , I knew that the main objectives were Kremas 2 and 3 , and that they were straight ahead of me , at the end of the tracks , about 800 meters—almost half a mile—away .
Quick calculation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minutes , and 10 minutes back , leaving 5 minutes for the chambers—or I can run .
I ran .
So , after an earnest five-minute run , I could at last see the ruins of the infamous Krema 2—site of the single greatest death toll at Auschwitz : some 300,000 people , on the conventional view ( Photo 14 ) .
Across the way , its twin facility , Krema 3—site of another 275,000 gassings ( Photo 15 ) .
Both buildings were destroyed by the Germans upon abandoning the camp , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and important structures .
Standing there in front of the remains of both buildings , one gets a real sense of the improbability of the conventional story .
Each building had an almost completely underground chamber , roughly 30 x 7 meters , at right angles to the main building , which contained the cremation ovens .
On the revisionist view , this chamber was a morgue—a large , unventilated , but cool , place to store dead bodies ( many infectious ) until they could be cremated .
On the standard view @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place in which 2,000 people were collectively gassed in less than 20 minutes .
( Photo 16 ) shows the collapsed roof of the Krema 2 chamber as it exists today .
Now , imagine this : You are somehow able to pack 2,000 frightened , sick , angry people , wall to wall , into this underground room—a room with only a single narrow doorway from the main building .
You then kill them all by sprinkling pellets of Zyklon-B over their heads , through openings in the roof .
Now you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , steeped in poisonous gas , without killing yourself or your fellow workers .
No problem—if you could peel the roof off and scoop them out with a backhoe .
Lacking that option , it would be nearly impossible in any reasonable amount of time .
And yet the experts , like Francizek Piper , claim that it took only three or four hours .
Incredible—that they can make such claims , and no one ( except the few revisionists ) challenges them .
There are other stories in these remains .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deadly cyanide gas .
If the chambers were used on as many people as claimed , the remaining bricks should have detectable cyanide compounds still in them .
And yet none are to be found .
Another story is the search for the roof openings into which the Zyklon pellets were poured—supposedly four per chamber .
Krema 2 ’ s roof is sufficiently intact that we should be able to find evidence of these holes .
And yet they are not to be found—not one single indisputable hole .
But my time was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Krema 3 for a last shot or two ( Photo 17 ) , and then back to the bus .
The other two crematoria , Kremas 4 and 5 , were across the camp , a good 600 meters away , in the wrong direction ; they would have to wait for my next visit .
So too would the two “ bunkers , ” or small converted farm houses , that were allegedly used to pilot the Birkenau gassing project in 1942 .
Almost nothing remains of them , yet it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ locations—the sites of some 250,000 jewish gassings , it is said .
But now it ’ s time to go .
Heading back along the tracks toward that most infamous of buildings , I couldn ’ t resist pausing for one more shot ( Photo 18 ) .
I arrived back at the bus just as the crowd was loading up—perfect timing .
After an hour ride we returned to Krakow around 2:00 pm .
But rather than sitting it out for another hour circuit of the city as we returned my fellow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the first stop and walk home .
A good move .
I was back at my hotel for less than an hour when the skies unleashed a pounding rain .
So luck was with me after all , that day—my day in Auschwitz .

A Postcard from Auschwitz
By Thomas Dalton Published: 2012-07-01
The following is a true account of my personal visit to the camp. All photos are my own.
Krakow is a beautiful city in early summer, the stand-out among southern Polish cities. Miraculously, the old city center survived both world wars unscathed. The huge central square is a sight to behold, and with no less than three major universities, Krakow bristles with youthful energy. Coming down by train from Warsaw, I was able to arrange a two-night stay before continuing on my way to Vienna. As with most major European cities, one quickly learns of the “must-see” sites: St. Mary’s Basilica, Wawel Castle, the salt mines, and of course, Auschwitz.
Photo 1: Auschwitz parking lot
Photo 2: Auschwitz museum entrance
Photo 3: “Arbeit Macht Frei” Photo 4: “Arbeit Macht Frei”
In the background of Photo 4 is Block 24, the building that housed the brothel and library for (non-jewish) inmates; the main entrance is shown in Photo 5. Photo 6 shows a typical view in the camp, of barrack buildings and a guard tower.
Photo 5: Block 24 (brothel and library).
Photo 6: Walking through the Stammlager.
This being my first visit to Auschwitz, I decided to see it as a tourist would. This was not only easier (I was travelling alone), but allowed me to better understand the “official” portrayal of the camp and of events there. Auschwitz is the number one tourist destination in all of Poland; about 1.3 million visit the camp every year—coincidentally, about the same number as is alleged to have been killed there. The official guided tours dictate a particular image of the camp, and I was as interested in this image as the camp itself. I wanted to see what the public sees.
So I went to one of the many tourist information offices around town and purchased a standard “day trip” to Auschwitz. The package, which included free pickup and return delivery to my hotel, cost 90 złoty, about $30—quite a deal. My pick-up time was set (8:30 am), and the van would be at my hotel the next morning, for the “6-hour tour.” Plenty of time to see the place, I thought, given that Oswieçim—the Polish name of Auschwitz—was only some 70 kilometers (about 40 miles) from Krakow.
The van dutifully arrived the next morning. But I soon realized that, as at Auschwitz itself, the tour was not quite as expected. The vehicle—a bit larger than I anticipated, more like a small bus—had a capacity of about 25 people. I was one of the first in, and the driver proceeded to cover much of the city in order to pick up our remaining guests. But between rush hour traffic, construction delays, and people slow getting out to the bus, a good hour went by before we were even ready to depart Krakow. So my “6-hour tour” was now down to five. And of course it would require another hour or so to return everyone; in other words, I was really getting a “4-hour tour.” Not sure that that counts as a “day trip,” but such is the life of a tourist in Poland. (I’m no tour planner, but it seemed to me that, if everyone simply walked to the central tourist office and met the bus there, that we could have saved a couple hours…)
It turned out that this little time crunch would impact our tour itself, and, in my suspicious mind, served an ulterior purpose. But I come to that matter in due course.
There are three distinct and roughly parallel paths from Krakow to Oswieçim: the (longer) expressway route, and two cross-country routes via two-lane roads. In good traffic, as I learned, all three take about one hour—a rather long time for a mere 40 miles. But Poland has only two kinds of roads: expressways and two-lane roads, and the latter are painfully slow. Our driver opted for one of the scenic country rides.
As soon as we were clear of Krakow city, the driver pulled out a DVD and popped it into a dashboard player. A small screen above us lit up: this was our complimentary 20-minute documentary about the camp (in English). No surprises here. We were treated to the usual recounting of the “extermination camp” history, the appalling conditions, the emaciated inmates, the gas chambers, and the “over one million” jewish deaths. Horror awaits, it seemed to say.
The remainder of the trip was uneventful. The forecasts called for rain that day, but supposedly not until later in the day; with luck it would hold out for our visit. Around 10:30 am—a good two hours after my pickup—we rolled into the town of Oswieçim. It was a typical smallish European town, nicely maintained, with the usual amenities. We drove only a few minutes through the town when, suddenly, we arrived at the main camp, Auschwitz I. For those not familiar, “Auschwitz” is comprised of three primary facilities, and dozens of smaller sub-camps. The original and main camp is Auschwitz I, also called the Stammlager. It opened as a National Socialist camp in 1940, but was originally built by the Polish army as a military barracks complex, apparently during World War I. This camp allegedly had a single gas chamber, which we were about to see. But the vast majority of the gassings are said to have occurred at Auschwitz II, known as Birkenau. This would come later in the day. The third facility, Auschwitz III (Monowitz), was located some three kilometers from the town, and served as an industrial facility; no mass murder is alleged to have happened there, and consequently it receives few tourists.
Knowing all this, I was still surprised at how integrated the main camp was into the town. This, I think, is not the usual image we have: the dreaded “Auschwitz death camp” located in the heart of a civilian village. But we have a good explanation for this, of course. Its original function, as a Polish military camp, had nothing to hide. And even as a German camp, when constructed in 1939 and 1940, it was not originally intended, even on the traditional view, as an extermination camp. The Germans were simply making good use of a captured military barracks.
Pulling into the parking lot, we were immediately confronted with a mass of vehicles: passenger cars, taxis, tour buses like our own, and full size long-haul buses packed with people. The place was a frenzy of activity—see Photos 1 and 2. Our bus disembarked, we merged with another small group, and then were assigned a tour guide: a cheerful young woman with a good knowledge of English, and of the standard story she was scripted to present.
We pushed through the mob into the entrance building, past the gift shop, and on into a small alcove. There we were given our headsets and radio receivers. It is a rather high-tech affair: with all the commotion and simultaneous tours in multiple languages, the Poles gave the tour guide a radio voice transmitter; each of us could then hear her speaking through our headsets. Thus each group heard only their personal guide. On the one hand, this was a clever and useful solution. No confusing cross-talk, and even if you drifted away from the group, you could still hear your guide speaking loud and clear. On the other hand, it had a noticeable (and to me, suspicious) side effect: questions from individuals to the guide could not be heard by the group. They were necessarily individual questions between you and the guide. When I did this on a couple of occasions, she answered me personally, but shut off the transmitter. No one else in the group heard either my questions, or the answers. Very clever, I thought to myself.
Moving into the camp grounds, we immediately came upon the famous “Arbeit Macht Frei” sign—“Work Makes You Free” (Photos 3 and 4).
Our group wandered through the camp, following the guide as she made stops in various barracks to tell us stories of the appalling conditions faced by the inmates. The buildings were mostly empty. Some contained walls of inmate photos; others, simulated sleeping bunks. One final barrack was set up rather as a standard museum. It had exhibits displaying inmate suitcases, personal items, and hair (cut from inmates as a precaution against lice). One large glassed-in exhibit showed an apparent mound of “thousands” of shoes—though, as Germar Rudolf has noted, the mound is displayed on an unseen elevated board, which is empty beneath. This is the same trick that grocers use to display fruit, to give the illusion of a vast quantity. The mound was not so vast after all.
At one point the guide mentioned the total Auschwitz death count as roughly 1 million jews and thousands of others. I caught up to her and asked if the toll wasn’t previously claimed to be 4 million. (Microphone off.) Yes, she said, but better research in the 1980s and 1990s had confirmed the new, lower figure. Any chance it would be lowered still in the future?, I asked. Unlikely, she said.
By this time, people were beginning to talk among themselves about the as-yet-unseen gas chambers. The guide then reminded us that, indeed, we were about to come to the gas chamber itself. “And oh, by the way,” she added, “most of the gassings were at Birkenau. But we’ll see that later.” It was already approaching 12:00 noon.
Finally we arrived at “the” gas chamber in the main camp, also called Krematorium #1 (or Krema 1, for short). It was a partially underground structure with a flat roof and sloping, grassy side walls with large trees—see Photo 7. Few statistics were given on the details of the gassings: no start or finish date (in fact, February to November 1942), no details on the gassing procedure (Zyklon pellets thrown in through roof vents), and only rough numbers of jews allegedly gassed there (about 20,000—a mere two percent of the claimed Auschwitz toll). We could not enter via the “inmate entrance,” as this was blocked off (Photo 8), so we went around to the other side (Photo 9).
Photo 7: Alleged Gas Chamber (Krema 1)
Photo 8: “Inmate entrance”
Photo 9: Entering Krema 1.
Upon entering the building, we were treated to what must have been the world’s shortest tour of a gas chamber. We walked in, took a hard right turn into a small room, then a hard left into the gas chamber itself. It was a windowless, rectangular room, about 25 x 5 meters. The guide said little more than “this is the gas chamber, no photos please,” and then she was off into the adjoining room with the cremation ovens. Rebel that I am, and not wanting to miss an opportunity, I lagged behind the group and then snapped a quick photo (#10). But the guide was gone—no chance to ask about the many post-war modifications to the room (chamber size, door location, chimney), nor about its history as a morgue and an air raid shelter. No chance to ask how 800 to 1000 people were jammed into that room, nor how the deadly Zyklon pellets were collected up without killing the guards handling the dead bodies. No chance to ask why the four Zyklon vents appeared to be added later than the original construction. No chance to ask about French traditionalist Eric Conan’s claim that “everything there is false.”
Photo 10: Alleged Gas Chamber Krema 1
In the oven room (Photo 11), we had about one minute to view the ovens themselves—“no photos please”—and our guide was off. No chance to ask why the reconstructed chimney was not attached to the ovens. No chance to ask why the six cremation muffles, which could handle six bodies per hour, were such a capacity mismatch with a gas chamber that could kill 800 to 1000 at a shot. Note: it would have taken roughly 150 hours—or more than 6 days working round the clock—to dispose of all the bodies from a single gassing.
Photo 11: Krema 1 oven.
Outside again, our guide was suddenly much more relaxed. Now we have time for a break, for bathrooms, for a visit to the gift shop, she said. “Be out front at the bus at 12:30, for the ride over to Birkenau.” Finally, I thought—the highlight of the trip.
Again, the “ride to Birkenau” was surprising—all of about five minutes. Out of the small village, across a field, and there we were, at the famous entrance building, complete with train tunnel (Photo 12—a poor exposure, as my camera was beginning to fail me). There we were, at the site of the greatest mass killing in human history: 1.1 million people, the vast majority jews, killed over two years (1943 and 1944), 90 percent of whom were gassed in the four crematoria.
Photo 12: Birkenau main gate.
I was very anxious to get inside and look around. Then another surprise. “Because we are running late,” said our guide (“late”?), “we will only have time to see the main guard tower and one of the barracks. Unfortunately we won’t be able to see the gas chambers.” What?! You must be kidding me, lady! No gas chambers?! Like hell!, I said to myself. “How much time do we have until the bus leaves?,” I asked our guide. “About 25 minutes.” “I’m going to the gas chambers.” “Ok,” she said as she headed off with the group. I didn’t care if I had to walk back to Krakow; I was going to see the Birkenau gas chambers.
Inside the main gate, one sees the train tracks going out into the distance, to a dead end, and flanked by guard towers and a loading area (Photo 13). Being familiar with the camp layout, I knew that the main objectives were Kremas 2 and 3, and that they were straight ahead of me, at the end of the tracks, about 800 meters—almost half a mile—away. Quick calculation: I can walk there in 10 minutes, and 10 minutes back, leaving 5 minutes for the chambers—or I can run. I ran.
Photo 13: Train tracks heading to gas chambers.
So, after an earnest five-minute run, I could at last see the ruins of the infamous Krema 2—site of the single greatest death toll at Auschwitz: some 300,000 people, on the conventional view (Photo 14). Across the way, its twin facility, Krema 3—site of another 275,000 gassings (Photo 15). Both buildings were destroyed by the Germans upon abandoning the camp, though Krema 2 retains some very relevant and important structures.
Photo 14: Krema 2 ruins.
Photo 15: Krema 3 ruins.
Standing there in front of the remains of both buildings, one gets a real sense of the improbability of the conventional story. Each building had an almost completely underground chamber, roughly 30 x 7 meters, at right angles to the main building, which contained the cremation ovens. On the revisionist view, this chamber was a morgue—a large, unventilated, but cool, place to store dead bodies (many infectious) until they could be cremated. On the standard view, this room was the gas chamber—a place in which 2,000 people were collectively gassed in less than 20 minutes. (Photo 16) shows the collapsed roof of the Krema 2 chamber as it exists today.
Photo 16: Alleged Krema 2 gas chamber.
Now, imagine this: You are somehow able to pack 2,000 frightened, sick, angry people, wall to wall, into this underground room—a room with only a single narrow doorway from the main building. You then kill them all by sprinkling pellets of Zyklon-B over their heads, through openings in the roof. Now you have to quickly extract the dead bodies, steeped in poisonous gas, without killing yourself or your fellow workers. No problem—if you could peel the roof off and scoop them out with a backhoe. Lacking that option, it would be nearly impossible in any reasonable amount of time. And yet the experts, like Francizek Piper, claim that it took only three or four hours. Incredible—that they can make such claims, and no one (except the few revisionists) challenges them.
There are other stories in these remains. One is the search for residue of the deadly cyanide gas. If the chambers were used on as many people as claimed, the remaining bricks should have detectable cyanide compounds still in them. And yet none are to be found. Another story is the search for the roof openings into which the Zyklon pellets were poured—supposedly four per chamber. Krema 2’s roof is sufficiently intact that we should be able to find evidence of these holes. And yet they are not to be found—not one single indisputable hole.
But my time was running short. A quick dash over to Krema 3 for a last shot or two (Photo 17), and then back to the bus. The other two crematoria, Kremas 4 and 5, were across the camp, a good 600 meters away, in the wrong direction; they would have to wait for my next visit. So too would the two “bunkers,” or small converted farm houses, that were allegedly used to pilot the Birkenau gassing project in 1942. Almost nothing remains of them, yet it would be interesting to hunt down their locations—the sites of some 250,000 jewish gassings, it is said. But now it’s time to go. Heading back along the tracks toward that most infamous of buildings, I couldn’t resist pausing for one more shot (Photo 18).
Photo 17: Alleged Krema 3 gas chamber.
Photo 18: Birkenau main entrance.
I arrived back at the bus just as the crowd was loading up—perfect timing. After an hour ride we returned to Krakow around 2:00 pm. But rather than sitting it out for another hour circuit of the city as we returned my fellow riders, I opted to hop out at the first stop and walk home. A good move. I was back at my hotel for less than an hour when the skies unleashed a pounding rain. So luck was with me after all, that day—my day in Auschwitz.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-11-12--Josef Mengele – the Creation of a Myth

Josef Mengele – the Creation of a Myth

May I ask my dear reader whether he or she recognizes any of the following names : Unless you ’ re an expert in the field , you probably have no clue who these people are .
The only name I would recognize , if I were to turn off my expert knowledge , is Clauberg , and that only because that was the name of my high-school art teacher ( first name unknown ) .
All the men listed above were at some point or other SS physicians at the infamous Auschwitz Camp .
[ 1 ] I omitted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that for a good reason , because that name would give it all away : Why is it that we all recognize this one name , but have no idea about all the others ?
And with all , I am not just referring to any of us .
This all also includes Auschwitz survivors .
If we read or listen to the many testimonies of the thousands of Auschwitz survivors , there seems to have been only one evil person in that entire huge camp : Josef Mengele .
Almost every survivor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sending people either to the gas chambers or subjecting them to some cruel , senseless , torturous experiments .
Just as Auschwitz has become the symbol for the Holocaust in general , so does Mengele symbolize the evil of Auschwitz .
They are synonymous .
Why is that so ?
Most of the above-listed individuals were arrested after the war at some point and either committed suicide while incarcerated or were sentenced to death or to extended prison terms .
Mengele escaped .
He was never caught .
In 1985 , years after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exile , however , his former whereabouts were revealed , his remains eventually exhumed and identified .
[ 2 ] Mengele wasn ’ t the only Auschwitz physician who managed to escape , though .
Hans Wilhelm König was even better than Mengele .
König disappeared without leaving a trace .
But no one has ever heard that name , or have you ?
We get an idea what the basis of the “ Mengele Myth ” is if we listen to one of the most-determined “ Nazi ” hunters of the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hunting for Josef Mengele during the 1980s , he stumbled upon the remarkable fact that survivors immediately after the war did not describe Mengele as the same evil criminal as he was portrayed in the 1980s or even later .
Sifting through newsletters published right after the war by and for “ survivors , ” he came across the ( false ) news that Mengele had been arrested in early 1947 .
On that occasion , survivor newsletters asked their readers for incriminating testimonies against Mengele , and such testimonies were then even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : [ 3 ] Of course , memories are more accurate a short time after an alleged event than decades later , so the image survivors had of Mengele in 1947 was most certainly more accurate as well .
In 1986 , shortly after the hunt for Mengele had been over , the Czech-German historian Zdenek Zofka wrote these memorable lines about how Mengele had become the center of attention of the Holocaust Industry : [ 4 ] Zofka ’ s aim with his paper was an attempt to “ correct the image @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distorted and exorbitantly exaggerated by the sensational media.
” He admits that , when trying to assess the crimes allegedly committed by Mengele , there is basically no documentary evidence to rely on , and that relying on witness accounts in such an atmosphere of hysteria is problematic , to say the least .
He continuous by stating : “ All too often , it is impossible to be sure that their [ the witnesses ’ ] recollections really refer to Mengele at all .
It is all too often possible to show @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SS physicians .
Almost all the inmates state that they were selected by Mengele on the ramp [ to be sent to the gas chamber ] .
But camp physicians performed the selections in shifts ; Mengele performed no more selections than any of the others.
” ( ibid.
, p. 246 ) When assessing Mengele ’ s purported crimes , we have to distinguish three different sets : Let ’ s discuss all three of them here briefly , with reference to further reading for those who want to learn more .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ one first , because it can be dealt with rather swiftly .
There is “ eyewitness ” testimony galore about utterly senseless , cruel experiments allegedly performed by Mengele , like changing eye colors by injecting dye into an eye , transplanting limbs and organs to random places in the body , and other nonsense .
While studying hundreds of “ survivor ” testimonies , I ’ ve come across a good share of these insults to the intellect , so insulting , indeed , that I will not waste my time listing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and you ’ ll stumble across these Halloweenish horror stories all over the place .
People evidently like to gawk at guts and gore , so the survivors , protected from scrutiny by their aura of sainthood , cater to that need .
Interestingly , the alleged victims of these experiments , quite frequently the very witnesses telling these tales , show no signs whatsoever of these cruel procedures .
And it goes without saying that there is not the slightest proof for any of it : no documents , no autopsies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Nothing .
It ’ s all a pack of lies , sweet and simple .
The alleged cruel experiments Mengele is said to have performed with twins deported to Auschwitz were so lethal that most of the twins he had enrolled in his research not only survived the war , but were even able to form an association in 1984 , toward the peak of the Mengele hysteria , which was meant to lobby for their and their descendants ’ interests : Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiment Survivors ( CANDLES @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s name : How can deadly lab experiments have any survivors ?
In fact , as Italian historian Carlo Mattogno has shown in his paper on Mengele ’ s twin research , [ 5 ] there are three facts which clearly prove that Mengele did not commit any crimes on those twins : • All the surviving paperwork clearly shows that his research was limited to anthropological and behavioral studies , but did not include any surgical or other intrusive procedures .
• All the twins enlisted for his research were enrolled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with none of them ever dying .
• Most of those involved – the twins as well as Mengele ’ s inmate assistants – survived Auschwitz and the war .
Separately , think of that : Children are not supposed to have gotten beyond the camp ’ s railway ramp .
Since they were obviously unfit for labor , the Holocaust orthodoxy has it that they were sent to the gas chamber straight away , but that ’ s evidently not what happened , not just with Mengele ’ s twin children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ long list of twins and children at Auschwitz who survived the camp , see Mattogno ’ s paper .
Which brings me to the final point : The selections at the railway ramps near the Auschwitz Camp and ( later ) inside the Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp .
There can be no doubt that these selections took place .
They happened at Auschwitz , and they happened at other German wartime camps as well .
They were usually performed by physicians , and it is safe to say that Mengele , as one of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do them as well .
But what were they about ?
Did those in charge , Mengele among them , decide who got to live and who was to die in the gas ?
To answer this question comprehensively would require the analysis of tens of thousands of documents that survived the war .
I ’ m not going to do this here , most importantly because there is no need to reinvent the wheel .
Others have done that already , and I ’ ll point the reader to them .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • Are there any documents indicating that homicidal gas chambers existed at Auschwitz ?
• What do the documents reveal about the purpose of selection ( s ) made ?
Regarding a. , let me quote from an article published in late 2016 in the conservative mainstream periodical Taki ’ s Magazine .
It was written by jewish activist David Cole , who in the 1990s was dabbling for a while in Auschwitz research .
In this Taki article , Cole , who believes in all other aspects of the orthodox Holocaust narrative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Auschwitz : [ 6 ] Fact is that challenging the orthodox Auschwitz – and Mengele – narrative is a crime in many countries , and in those countries where it is not , doing so will still turn challengers into social pariahs .
Hence , you won ’ t hear a word from any mainstream scholar about the fact that “ the evidence just isn ’ t there.
” When scientists have to act under the threat of legal or professional penalty , we can neither trust them nor their research results .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ those who don ’ t bend to the pressure ; who literally risk loss of life , limb and liberty when publishing their iconoclastic research results .
I may point out two of those studies which can give the reader a good overview as to why we have an “ Auschwitz problem ” : 1 .
The Real Case for Auschwitz by the already-mentioned Carlo Mattogno .
[ 7 ] This thick volume of some 750 pages thoroughly discusses all the relevant documentary evidence on those buildings which are said to have contained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ main foundation upon which Cole based his conclusion that the evidence for the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz “ just isn ’ t there , ” and that “ the evidence that does exist calls that claim into question.
” 2 .
The Chemistry of Auschwitz , by , well , myself .
[ 8 ] This 440-page book summarizes the documentary situation succinctly ( which saves you having to read the 750 pages of the first book mentioned ) and forensically evaluates various kinds of material evidence of the purported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studies that could be listed , but the interested reader can learn about them when perusing the two works just mentioned .
The upshot of all these studies is quite simply that there can not have been any homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz .
The forensic and documentary evidence positively refutes even the possibility of their existence .
This brings us to Point b .
If the selections where not designed to send people to the gas chambers , what purpose did they serve ?
Well , if a camp received hundreds of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the SS supposed to do ?
Just let those deportees walk in and do whatever they pleased ?
Some kind of admission procedure had to be in place where it was figured out which deportee was to be lodged in which building in which part of the camp , or who of them will even be sent to another camp .
Such an admission procedure happens in every prison and camp in every country .
That wasn ’ t any different at Auschwitz .
Having physicians involved to assess the health of incoming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detailed analysis of the surviving documentation clearly shows in this regard as well that there was nothing sinister or unusual about those selections at Auschwitz .
[ 9 ] But what about all those witnesses ?
Well , if we look into witnesses who testified about their experiences with Dr. Mengele right at the end of the war , before memories got corrupted by the Mengele hysteria starting at the late 1970s/early 1980s , there is really only one witness saying anything of substance : the jewish physician Miklos Nyiszli from Hungary , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Auschwitz was the assistant of Dr. Mengele , if we are to believe him .
The late German mainstream historian and expert of Third Reich history Prof. Dr. Werner Maser said about Nyiszli simply that he “ lied excessively.
” [ 10 ] He didn ’ t justify this harsh assessment , however , because that would have required citing the writings of heretics , which Maser didn ’ t want to do to prevent getting himself in trouble ( so he admitted to me ) .
In his above-quoted paper on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the main reasons why Nyiszli was indeed an imposter and excessive liar .
The reader interested in a thorough , 300-page critique of Nyiszli ’ s various tall tales in English will have to wait until later this year , though , when a study dedicated to this key witness is slated to appear .
[ 11 ] Mengele is special , so special , indeed , that this is the only uncommon German last name my English spell checker doesn ’ t complain about .
Like blitzkrieg and Auschwitz , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the English language .
What a proud legacy of a reviled concentration-camp physician !
In Mengele ’ s case , however , it is safe to say that this isn ’ t his fault .
As Wikipedia writes correctly , quoting the one book that was most influential in cementing the Mengele hysteria : [ 12 ] Mengele was a deputy of the Auschwitz garrison physician Dr. Eduard Wirths .
Wirths , in turn , was celebrated by hundreds of Auschwitz inmates as a hero , as the “ Angel of Auschwitz ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them with his selfless efforts to improve their lot and to battle the epidemics reaping a gruesome harvest at Auschwitz .
[ 13 ] Mengele was Wirths ’ s right-hand man – in the battle to save as many lives as possible of those whom the authorities of the Third Reich had recklessly and irresponsibly deported to Auschwitz .
Mengele was not just innocent of the crimes he is accused of .
Together with Eduard Wirths and the other physicians at Auschwitz , his tireless efforts saved the lives of ten thousands @ @ @

Josef Mengele – the Creation of a Myth
By Germar Rudolf Published: 2017-04-22
May I ask my dear reader whether he or she recognizes any of the following names:
Fritz Klein, Heinz Thilo, Bruno Kitt, Erwin von Helmersen, Werner Rohde, Hellmuth Vetter, Horst Schumann, Carl Clauberg, Hans Wilhelm König, Franz Lucas, Alfred Trzebinski, Oskar Dienstbach, Siegfried Schwela, Franz von Bodmann, Kurt Uhlenbroock, Eduard Wirths, Hans Münch, Johann Paul Kremer, Horst Fischer, Friedrich Entress?
Unless you’re an expert in the field, you probably have no clue who these people are. The only name I would recognize, if I were to turn off my expert knowledge, is Clauberg, and that only because that was the name of my high-school art teacher (first name unknown).
All the men listed above were at some point or other SS physicians at the infamous Auschwitz Camp.[1]
I omitted one name from the list, and that for a good reason, because that name would give it all away:
Josef Mengele.
SS officers at Auschwitz. From left to right: Richard Baer, Josef Mengele, Josef Kramer, Rudolf Höss (From the so-called Höcker Album, USHMM Archive)
Why is it that we all recognize this one name, but have no idea about all the others? And with all, I am not just referring to any of us. This all also includes Auschwitz survivors. If we read or listen to the many testimonies of the thousands of Auschwitz survivors, there seems to have been only one evil person in that entire huge camp: Josef Mengele. Almost every survivor mentions him as an evil SS doctor sending people either to the gas chambers or subjecting them to some cruel, senseless, torturous experiments. Just as Auschwitz has become the symbol for the Holocaust in general, so does Mengele symbolize the evil of Auschwitz. They are synonymous.
Why is that so?
Mengele Hysteria
Most of the above-listed individuals were arrested after the war at some point and either committed suicide while incarcerated or were sentenced to death or to extended prison terms. Mengele escaped. He was never caught. In 1985, years after his death in 1979 in his South-American exile, however, his former whereabouts were revealed, his remains eventually exhumed and identified.[2]
Mengele wasn’t the only Auschwitz physician who managed to escape, though. Hans Wilhelm König was even better than Mengele. König disappeared without leaving a trace. But no one has ever heard that name, or have you?
We get an idea what the basis of the “Mengele Myth” is if we listen to one of the most-determined “Nazi” hunters of the world, the Israeli Efraim Zuroff. While hunting for Josef Mengele during the 1980s, he stumbled upon the remarkable fact that survivors immediately after the war did not describe Mengele as the same evil criminal as he was portrayed in the 1980s or even later. Sifting through newsletters published right after the war by and for “survivors,” he came across the (false) news that Mengele had been arrested in early 1947. On that occasion, survivor newsletters asked their readers for incriminating testimonies against Mengele, and such testimonies were then even published. But, as Zuroff summarizes:[3]
“The content of these articles proved quite surprising because they clearly indicated that the Mengele of 1985, who had become a symbol of evil and the personification of the perversion of science, did not enjoy the same notoriety in 1947. […Zuroff noted] that Mengele was not considered a very high-ranking criminal [in 1947], nor was his supposed arrest regarded as an event of exceptional significance. […] This notice was, in effect, the first indication that the status of the infamous ‘Angel of Death’ had grown by leaps and bounds over the years. […Mengele was], in a certain sense, not the same person who was simultaneously hunted for in South America.”
Of course, memories are more accurate a short time after an alleged event than decades later, so the image survivors had of Mengele in 1947 was most certainly more accurate as well.
In 1986, shortly after the hunt for Mengele had been over, the Czech-German historian Zdenek Zofka wrote these memorable lines about how Mengele had become the center of attention of the Holocaust Industry:[4]
“After the fortieth anniversary of the ‘liberation’ of Auschwitz and after the ‘Mengele Tribunal’ had been staged on occasion of that anniversary in Jerusalem, the search for Mengele was intensified drastically. The reward leading to his capture was increased by the government of the German state of Hesse from 40,000 to one million deutschmarks, and the reward finally reached the staggering height of ten million deutschmarks due to private donations. Along with the intensified search for Mengele, the media’s interest in the case escalated as well. The ‘Angel of Death of Auschwitz’ offered perfect opportunities for an incessant flood of sensational news, and increasingly cruel and shocking crimes committed by Mengele were revealed with reference to witnesses. The mass murderer Mengele turned into the evil incarnate as such, the outright superhuman demon, as Robert Lifton writes.”
Zofka’s aim with his paper was an attempt to “correct the image of Josef Mengele, which has been distorted and exorbitantly exaggerated by the sensational media.” He admits that, when trying to assess the crimes allegedly committed by Mengele, there is basically no documentary evidence to rely on, and that relying on witness accounts in such an atmosphere of hysteria is problematic, to say the least. He continuous by stating:
“All too often, it is impossible to be sure that their [the witnesses’] recollections really refer to Mengele at all. It is all too often possible to show that Mengele has been confused with other SS physicians. Almost all the inmates state that they were selected by Mengele on the ramp [to be sent to the gas chamber]. But camp physicians performed the selections in shifts; Mengele performed no more selections than any of the others.” (ibid., p. 246)
This underscores the point I made earlier.
When assessing Mengele’s purported crimes, we have to distinguish three different sets:
Selecting inmates for the gas chambers. Experiments with twins. Random medical experiments.
Let’s discuss all three of them here briefly, with reference to further reading for those who want to learn more. Let’s start with the last one first, because it can be dealt with rather swiftly.
Random Medical Experiments
There is “eyewitness” testimony galore about utterly senseless, cruel experiments allegedly performed by Mengele, like changing eye colors by injecting dye into an eye, transplanting limbs and organs to random places in the body, and other nonsense. While studying hundreds of “survivor” testimonies, I’ve come across a good share of these insults to the intellect, so insulting, indeed, that I will not waste my time listing them here. Google the net, and you’ll stumble across these Halloweenish horror stories all over the place. People evidently like to gawk at guts and gore, so the survivors, protected from scrutiny by their aura of sainthood, cater to that need. Interestingly, the alleged victims of these experiments, quite frequently the very witnesses telling these tales, show no signs whatsoever of these cruel procedures. And it goes without saying that there is not the slightest proof for any of it: no documents, no autopsies, no medical examination on survivors proving it. Nothing. It’s all a pack of lies, sweet and simple.
Twins
The alleged cruel experiments Mengele is said to have performed with twins deported to Auschwitz were so lethal that most of the twins he had enrolled in his research not only survived the war, but were even able to form an association in 1984, toward the peak of the Mengele hysteria, which was meant to lobby for their and their descendants’ interests: Children of Auschwitz Nazi Deadly Lab Experiment Survivors (CANDLES). Read and rethink the association’s name: How can deadly lab experiments have any survivors?
In fact, as Italian historian Carlo Mattogno has shown in his paper on Mengele’s twin research,[5] there are three facts which clearly prove that Mengele did not commit any crimes on those twins:
All the surviving paperwork clearly shows that his research was limited to anthropological and behavioral studies, but did not include any surgical or other intrusive procedures. All the twins enlisted for his research were enrolled in that program for months on end, with none of them ever dying. Most of those involved – the twins as well as Mengele’s inmate assistants – survived Auschwitz and the war.
Separately, think of that: Children are not supposed to have gotten beyond the camp’s railway ramp. Since they were obviously unfit for labor, the Holocaust orthodoxy has it that they were sent to the gas chamber straight away, but that’s evidently not what happened, not just with Mengele’s twin children, but in general.
For the long list of twins and children at Auschwitz who survived the camp, see Mattogno’s paper.
Gas-Chamber Selections
Which brings me to the final point: The selections at the railway ramps near the Auschwitz Camp and (later) inside the Auschwitz-Birkenau Camp. There can be no doubt that these selections took place. They happened at Auschwitz, and they happened at other German wartime camps as well. They were usually performed by physicians, and it is safe to say that Mengele, as one of the many Auschwitz physicians, was ordered to do them as well.
But what were they about? Did those in charge, Mengele among them, decide who got to live and who was to die in the gas?
To answer this question comprehensively would require the analysis of tens of thousands of documents that survived the war. I’m not going to do this here, most importantly because there is no need to reinvent the wheel. Others have done that already, and I’ll point the reader to them.
The issue boils down to two questions:
Are there any documents indicating that homicidal gas chambers existed at Auschwitz? What do the documents reveal about the purpose of selection(s) made?
Regarding a., let me quote from an article published in late 2016 in the conservative mainstream periodical Taki’s Magazine. It was written by jewish activist David Cole, who in the 1990s was dabbling for a while in Auschwitz research. In this Taki article, Cole, who believes in all other aspects of the orthodox Holocaust narrative, explains why he has problems with Auschwitz:[6]
“Ah, Auschwitz. Yes, here’s where we still have a problem. […] there are genuine problems with what is commonly claimed to be part 3 [of the Holocaust]—that in 1943 Auschwitz-Birkenau was ‘renovated’ to become an ultra-super be-all end-all extermination facility. To me, the evidence just isn’t there, and the evidence that does exist calls that claim into question. […Orthodox historians] backed themselves into a corner by putting Auschwitz, with its phony, postwar tourist-attraction ‘gas chamber’ and its complete lack of documentary evidence supporting a killing program, front and center as the heart of the Holocaust. They’re in so deep at this point that they can’t back off.
It’s surprisingly easy to get the leading lights of anti-denial to admit as much one-on-one. Rick Eaton has been the senior researcher at the Simon Wiesenthal Center for thirty years. He’s as major a player in the fight against Holocaust denial as anyone on earth. Two years ago, I corresponded with him (under a pseudonym, of course… he’d never speak directly with the likes of me!) regarding the Auschwitz problem. I explained my thesis to him, that Auschwitz, having various ‘issues’ that call the credibility of extermination claims into question, should not be used to represent the Holocaust. He agreed […].
Keep in mind that even though I was using a pseudonym, I was not falsely claiming to be anyone of note. In other words, Eaton made that admission to a complete nobody, a total stranger. One gets the feeling that many of these experts are secretly longing for the day when they can be open about the ‘Auschwitz problem’ and move past it […].”
Fact is that challenging the orthodox Auschwitz – and Mengele – narrative is a crime in many countries, and in those countries where it is not, doing so will still turn challengers into social pariahs. Hence, you won’t hear a word from any mainstream scholar about the fact that “the evidence just isn’t there.” When scientists have to act under the threat of legal or professional penalty, we can neither trust them nor their research results.
All that remains are the studies of those who don’t bend to the pressure; who literally risk loss of life, limb and liberty when publishing their iconoclastic research results. I may point out two of those studies which can give the reader a good overview as to why we have an “Auschwitz problem”:
1. The Real Case for Auschwitz by the already-mentioned Carlo Mattogno.[7] This thick volume of some 750 pages thoroughly discusses all the relevant documentary evidence on those buildings which are said to have contained homicidal gas chambers. This is the main foundation upon which Cole based his conclusion that the evidence for the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz “just isn’t there,” and that “the evidence that does exist calls that claim into question.”
2. The Chemistry of Auschwitz, by, well, myself.[8] This 440-page book summarizes the documentary situation succinctly (which saves you having to read the 750 pages of the first book mentioned) and forensically evaluates various kinds of material evidence of the purported crime scene.
There are many more studies that could be listed, but the interested reader can learn about them when perusing the two works just mentioned.
The upshot of all these studies is quite simply that there cannot have been any homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. The forensic and documentary evidence positively refutes even the possibility of their existence.
This brings us to Point b. If the selections where not designed to send people to the gas chambers, what purpose did they serve? Well, if a camp received hundreds of inmates in one swoop, what was the SS supposed to do? Just let those deportees walk in and do whatever they pleased? Some kind of admission procedure had to be in place where it was figured out which deportee was to be lodged in which building in which part of the camp, or who of them will even be sent to another camp. Such an admission procedure happens in every prison and camp in every country. That wasn’t any different at Auschwitz. Having physicians involved to assess the health of incoming deportees makes sense, too. A detailed analysis of the surviving documentation clearly shows in this regard as well that there was nothing sinister or unusual about those selections at Auschwitz.[9]
Witnesses
But what about all those witnesses? Well, if we look into witnesses who testified about their experiences with Dr. Mengele right at the end of the war, before memories got corrupted by the Mengele hysteria starting at the late 1970s/early 1980s, there is really only one witness saying anything of substance: the jewish physician Miklos Nyiszli from Hungary, who for several months of his incarceration at Auschwitz was the assistant of Dr. Mengele, if we are to believe him.
The late German mainstream historian and expert of Third Reich history Prof. Dr. Werner Maser said about Nyiszli simply that he “lied excessively.”[10] He didn’t justify this harsh assessment, however, because that would have required citing the writings of heretics, which Maser didn’t want to do to prevent getting himself in trouble (so he admitted to me). In his above-quoted paper on Mengele, Mattogno gave a brief summary of the main reasons why Nyiszli was indeed an imposter and excessive liar. The reader interested in a thorough, 300-page critique of Nyiszli’s various tall tales in English will have to wait until later this year, though, when a study dedicated to this key witness is slated to appear.[11]
The Legacy
A drawing of a prisoner showing Dr. Wirths, garrison physician at Auschwitz between September 1942 and early 1945, as a knight in shining uniform battling against lice infestation and thus typhus.
Mengele is special, so special, indeed, that this is the only uncommon German last name my English spell checker doesn’t complain about. Like blitzkrieg and Auschwitz, this term has become a fixed part of the English language. What a proud legacy of a reviled concentration-camp physician!
In Mengele’s case, however, it is safe to say that this isn’t his fault. As Wikipedia writes correctly, quoting the one book that was most influential in cementing the Mengele hysteria:[12]
“Rolf [Mengele, Josef’s son], who had not seen his father since the ski holiday in 1956, visited him there [in São Paulo, Brazil] in 1977 and found an unrepentant ‘Nazi’ who claimed he had never personally harmed anyone and had only done his duty.”
Mengele was a deputy of the Auschwitz garrison physician Dr. Eduard Wirths. Wirths, in turn, was celebrated by hundreds of Auschwitz inmates as a hero, as the “Angel of Auschwitz” saving the lives of tens of thousands of them with his selfless efforts to improve their lot and to battle the epidemics reaping a gruesome harvest at Auschwitz.[13] Mengele was Wirths’s right-hand man – in the battle to save as many lives as possible of those whom the authorities of the Third Reich had recklessly and irresponsibly deported to Auschwitz.
Mengele was not just innocent of the crimes he is accused of. Together with Eduard Wirths and the other physicians at Auschwitz, his tireless efforts saved the lives of ten thousands of inmates.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-11-12--Ogmius – The Eloquent Heracles of the Gauls

By Lucian of Samosata tr .
by H. W. Fowler and F. G. Fowler ( 1905 ) Our Heracles is known among the Gauls under the local name of Ogmius ; and the appearance he presents in their pictures is truly grotesque .
They make him out as old as old can be : the few hairs he has left ( he is quite bald in front ) are dead white , and his skin is wrinkled and tanned as black as any old salt ’ s .
You would take him for some infernal deity , for Charon or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Such as he is , however , he has all the proper attributes of that God : the lion ’ s-skin hangs over his shoulders , his right hand grasps the club , his left the strung bow , and a quiver is slung at his side ; nothing is wanting to the Heraclean equipment .
Now I thought at first that this was just a cut at the Greek Gods ; that in taking these liberties with the personal appearance of Heracles , the Gauls were merely exacting pictorial vengeance for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in his search after the herds of Geryon he had overrun and plundered most3 of the peoples of the West .
However , I have yet to mention the most remarkable feature in the portrait .
This ancient Heracles drags after him a vast crowd of men , all of whom are fastened by the ears with thin chains composed of gold and amber , and looking more like beautiful necklaces than anything else .
From this flimsy bondage they make no attempt to escape , though escape must be easy .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : instead of planting their heels in the ground and dragging back , they follow with joyful alacrity , singing their captor ’ s praises the while ; and from the eagerness with which they hurry after him to prevent the chains from tightening , one would say that release is the last thing they desire .
Nor will I conceal from you what struck me as the most curious circumstance of all .
Heracles ’ s right hand is occupied with the club , and his left with the bow : how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the chains ?
The painter solves the difficulty by boring a hole in the tip of the God ’ s tongue , and making that the means of attachment ; his head is turned round , and he regards his followers with a smiling countenance .
For a long time I stood staring at this in amazement : I knew not what to make of it , and was beginning to feel somewhat nettled , when I was addressed in admirable Greek by a Gaul who stood at my side , and who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gallic mythology , proved to be not unfamiliar with our own .
‘ Sir , ’ he said , ‘ I see this picture puzzles you : let me solve the riddle .
We Gauls connect eloquence not with Hermes , as you do , but with the mightier Heracles .
Nor need it surprise you to see him represented as an old man .
It is the prerogative of eloquence , that it reaches perfection in old age ; at least if we may believe your poets , who tell us that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s lips honey is distilled ; and that the words of the Trojan counsellors are compared to the lily , which , if I have not forgotten my Greek , is the name of a flower .
Hence , if you will consider the relation that exists between tongue and ear , you will find nothing more natural than the way in which our Heracles , who is Eloquence personified , draws men along with their ears tied to his tongue .
Nor is any slight intended by the hole bored through that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of your comic poets in which we are told that Indeed , we refer the achievements of the original Heracles , from first to last , to his wisdom and persuasive eloquence .
His shafts , as I take it , are no other than his words ; swift , keen-pointed , true-aimed to do deadly execution on the soul.
’ And in conclusion he reminded me of our own phrase , ‘ winged words.
’ Now while I was debating within myself the advisability of appearing before you , and of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the verdict of this enormous jury , old as I am , and long unused to lecturing , the thought of this Heracles portrait came to my relief .
I had been afraid that some of you would consider it a piece of youthful audacity inexcusable in one of my years .
‘ Thy force , ’ some Homeric youth might remark with crushing effect , ‘ is spent ; dull age hath borne thee down ’ ; and he might add , in playful allusion to my gouty toes , But the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keep me in countenance emboldens me to risk everything : I am no older than he .
Good-bye , then , to bodily perfections , to strengthand speed and beauty ; Love , when he sees my grey beard , is welcome to fly past , as the poet of Teos has it , with rush of gilded wings ; ’ tis all one to Hippoclides .
Old age is Wisdom ’ s youth , the day of her glorious flower : let her draw whom she can by the ears ; let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fear now lest the supply run short .
There is the old man ’ s comfort , on the strength of which he ventures to drag down his boat , which has long lain high and dry , provision her as best he may , and once more put out to sea .
Never did I stand in more need of a generous breeze , to fill my sails and speed me on my way : may the Gods dispose you to contribute thereto ; so shall I not be found wanting , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it shall be said

By Lucian of Samosata
tr. by H. W. Fowler and F. G. Fowler (1905)
Our Heracles is known among the Gauls under the local name of Ogmius; and the appearance he presents in their pictures is truly grotesque. They make him out as old as old can be: the few hairs he has left (he is quite bald in front) are dead white, and his skin is wrinkled and tanned as black as any old salt’s. You would take him for some infernal deity, for Charon or Iapetus,–any one rather than Heracles. Such as he is, however, he has all the proper attributes of that God: the lion’s-skin hangs over his shoulders, his right hand grasps the club, his left the strung bow, and a quiver is slung at his side; nothing is wanting to the Heraclean equipment.
Now I thought at first that this was just a cut at the Greek Gods; that in taking these liberties with the personal appearance of Heracles, the Gauls were merely exacting pictorial vengeance for his invasion of their territory; for in his search after the herds of Geryon he had overrun and plundered most3 of the peoples of the West. However, I have yet to mention the most remarkable feature in the portrait. This ancient Heracles drags after him a vast crowd of men, all of whom are fastened by the ears with thin chains composed of gold and amber, and looking more like beautiful necklaces than anything else. From this flimsy bondage they make no attempt to escape, though escape must be easy. There is not the slightest show of resistance: instead of planting their heels in the ground and dragging back, they follow with joyful alacrity, singing their captor’s praises the while; and from the eagerness with which they hurry after him to prevent the chains from tightening, one would say that release is the last thing they desire. Nor will I conceal from you what struck me as the most curious circumstance of all. Heracles’s right hand is occupied with the club, and his left with the bow: how is he to hold the ends of the chains? The painter solves the difficulty by boring a hole in the tip of the God’s tongue, and making that the means of attachment; his head is turned round, and he regards his followers with a smiling countenance.
For a long time I stood staring at this in amazement: I knew not what to make of it, and was beginning to feel somewhat nettled, when I was addressed in admirable Greek by a Gaul who stood at my side, and who besides possessing a scholarly acquaintance with the Gallic mythology, proved to be not unfamiliar with our own. ‘Sir,’ he said, ‘I see this picture puzzles you: let me solve the riddle. We Gauls connect eloquence not with Hermes, as you do, but with the mightier Heracles. Nor need it surprise you to see him represented as an old man. It is the prerogative of eloquence, that it reaches perfection in old age; at least if we may believe your poets, who tell us that
Youth is the sport of every random gust,
whereas old age
Hath that to say that passes youthful wit.
Thus we find that from Nestor’s lips honey is distilled; and that the words of the Trojan counsellors are compared to the lily, which, if I have not forgotten my Greek, is the name of a flower. Hence, if you will consider the relation that exists between tongue and ear, you will find nothing more natural than the way in which our Heracles, who is Eloquence personified, draws men along with their ears tied to his tongue. Nor is any slight intended by the hole bored through that member: I recollect a passage in one of your comic poets in which we are told that
There is a hole in every glib tongue’s tip.
Indeed, we refer the achievements of the original Heracles, from first to last, to his wisdom and persuasive eloquence. His shafts, as I take it, are no other than his words; swift, keen-pointed, true-aimed to do deadly execution on the soul.’ And in conclusion he reminded me of our own phrase, ‘winged words.’
Now while I was debating within myself the advisability of appearing before you, and of submitting myself for a second time to the verdict of this enormous jury, old as I am, and long unused to lecturing, the thought of this Heracles portrait came to my relief. I had been afraid that some of you would consider it a piece of youthful audacity inexcusable in one of my years. ‘Thy force,’ some Homeric youth might remark with crushing effect, ‘is spent; dull age hath borne thee down’; and he might add, in playful allusion to my gouty toes,
Slow are thy steeds, and weakness waits upon thee.
8
But the thought of having that venerable hero to keep me in countenance emboldens me to risk everything: I am no older than he. Good-bye, then, to bodily perfections, to strengthand speed and beauty; Love, when he sees my grey beard, is welcome to fly past, as the poet of Teos 1 has it, with rush of gilded wings; ’tis all one to Hippoclides. Old age is Wisdom’s youth, the day of her glorious flower: let her draw whom she can by the ears; let her shoot her bolts freely; no fear now lest the supply run short. There is the old man’s comfort, on the strength of which he ventures to drag down his boat, which has long lain high and dry, provision her as best he may, and once more put out to sea.
Never did I stand in more need of a generous breeze, to fill my sails and speed me on my way: may the Gods dispose you to contribute thereto; so shall I not be found wanting, and of me, as of Odysseus, it shall be said
How stout a thigh lurked ‘neath the old man’s rags!
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-12--New York State Bar Association Urges State To Make COVID-19 Vaccine Mandatory For Everyone

Can vaccines be made mandatory for everybody ?
We ’ ve seen this be the case for public schools in many countries where children are not allowed to attend if they ’ re not fully vaccinated .
As a result many parents have to either homeschool or look for some type of private schooling option .
That being said , many places still allow for religious and medical exemptions .
The idea that governments can make vaccines mandatory doesn ’ t seem to resonate with a lot of people , and it seems that in the near future we may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ that are offered to us and overseen by governments if we refuse to comply with medical mandates .
We may not be allowed to get approval on our passports to travel for example , or may not be able to enter into government buildings , work if you are a doctor or teacher etc .
What does this mean ?
Is it time to stop relying and depending on these services ?
Is it possible for humanity to become somewhat self sufficient and govern itself in a way where we can avoid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more and more on the population ?
Can those who don ’ t want to receive the vaccine for themselves and their children be understood and accepted by those who do , and vice versa ?
Isn ’ t it possible that we can all co-exist together and move forward regardless of what we believe in without the threat of loosing our freedoms , while being open to other perspectives and information that conflicts with what we believe in ?
Why is there so much divide , anger and hatred between us all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State Bar Association passed a resolution this past Saturday urging the state to consider making the vaccine mandatory for everybody in the state , regardless if many object to it for religious , philosophical or personal reasons .
According to Jason Grant , a staff writer covering legal stories and cases for the New York Law Journal , Chair of the New York Bar association ’ s Health Law Section ’ s Task Force on COVID-19 Mary Beth Morrissey expressed that the state has the authority to respond to such a public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well-established in constitutional law .
But what if that response is not agreed upon by many doctors and scientists ?
Who gets to decide ?
It ’ s become quite clear that vaccine hesitancy is at all time high , especially among many doctors as expressed at a World Health Organization conference late last year .
Morrissey went on to state that : Why It Matters : The idea that vaccinations can help protect others is founded upon the idea of herd immunity , a theory based on the behaviour of wild-type viruses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been ridiculed when it comes to COVID-19 by people like Dr. Anthony Fauci , despite that tens of thousands of doctors and scientists who strongly oppose lockdown measures believe it can be an effective way to stop and slow the spread of COVID-19 .
In a 2014 analysis in the Oregon Law Review by New York University ( NYU ) legal scholars Mary Holland and Chase E. Zachary ( who also has a Princeton-conferred doctorate in chemistry ) , the authors show that 60 years of compulsory vaccine policies “ have no attained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is time , they suggest , to cast aside coercion in favor of voluntary choice .
Will the same trend continue with a COVID vaccine ?
A recent consensus statement from a group of renowned infectious disease clinicians observed that vaccine programs have proven ill-suited to the fast-changing viruses underlying these illnesses , with efficacy ranging from 19 % to 54 % in the past few years .
The point is that justifications for a mandatory COVID vaccine , and other vaccines for that matter , have been heavily disputed .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and when the masses do not agree with mandatory measures recommended and implemented by governments , can we really living in a democracy ?
Are citizens really being represented by government ?
Have other interests gotten in the way ?
Governments are supposed to work for the people and represent the will of the people , yet the common observation of our current reality states we have long strayed from that .

By
Can vaccines be made mandatory for everybody? We’ve seen this be the case for public schools in many countries where children are not allowed to attend if they’re not fully vaccinated. As a result many parents have to either homeschool or look for some type of private schooling option. That being said, many places still allow for religious and medical exemptions.
The idea that governments can make vaccines mandatory doesn’t seem to resonate with a lot of people, and it seems that in the near future we may not be allowed to use ‘services’ that are offered to us and overseen by governments if we refuse to comply with medical mandates. We may not be allowed to get approval on our passports to travel for example, or may not be able to enter into government buildings, work if you are a doctor or teacher etc.
What does this mean? Is it time to stop relying and depending on these services? Is it possible for humanity to become somewhat self sufficient and govern itself in a way where we can avoid authoritarian measures that seem to be pushed more and more on the population? Can those who don’t want to receive the vaccine for themselves and their children be understood and accepted by those who do, and vice versa? Isn’t it possible that we can all co-exist together and move forward regardless of what we believe in without the threat of loosing our freedoms, while being open to other perspectives and information that conflicts with what we believe in? Why is there so much divide, anger and hatred between us all?
What Happened: The New York State Bar Association passed a resolution this past Saturday urging the state to consider making the vaccine mandatory for everybody in the state, regardless if many object to it for religious, philosophical or personal reasons.
According to Jason Grant, a staff writer covering legal stories and cases for the New York Law Journal,
The resolution does contain conditions limiting its scope. Those include that the state government should only consider making vaccinations mandatory if voluntary COVID-19 vaccinations fall short of producing needed levels of population immunity; that an assessment of the health threat to various communities be made so that perhaps the mandate can be targeted; and that a mandate only be considered after there is expert consensus about the vaccine”s safety and efficacy.
Chair of the New York Bar association’s Health Law Section’s Task Force on COVID-19 Mary Beth Morrissey expressed that the state has the authority to respond to such a public health crisis, and that this authority is well-established in constitutional law. But what if that response is not agreed upon by many doctors and scientists? Who gets to decide? It’s become quite clear that vaccine hesitancy is at all time high, especially among many doctors as expressed at a World Health Organization conference late last year.
Morrissey went on to state that:
“In balancing the protection of the public’s health and civil liberties, the Public Health Law recognized that a person’s health can and does affect others…It may become necessary to require that certain individuals or communities be vaccinated…”
Why It Matters: The idea that vaccinations can help protect others is founded upon the idea of herd immunity, a theory based on the behaviour of wild-type viruses, a theory that’s also been ridiculed when it comes to COVID-19 by people like Dr. Anthony Fauci, despite that tens of thousands of doctors and scientists who strongly oppose lockdown measures believe it can be an effective way to stop and slow the spread of COVID-19.
In a 2014 analysis in the Oregon Law Review by New York University (NYU) legal scholars Mary Holland and Chase E. Zachary (who also has a Princeton-conferred doctorate in chemistry), the authors show that 60 years of compulsory vaccine policies “have no attained herd immunity for any childhood disease.” It is time, they suggest, to cast aside coercion in favor of voluntary choice.
Will the same trend continue with a COVID vaccine?
A recent consensus statement from a group of renowned infectious disease clinicians observed that vaccine programs have proven ill-suited to the fast-changing viruses underlying these illnesses, with efficacy ranging from 19% to 54% in the past few years.
The point is that justifications for a mandatory COVID vaccine, and other vaccines for that matter, have been heavily disputed. There is a great divide among the citizenry, and when the masses do not agree with mandatory measures recommended and implemented by governments, can we really living in a democracy? Are citizens really being represented by government? Have other interests gotten in the way? Governments are supposed to work for the people and represent the will of the people, yet the common observation of our current reality states we have long strayed from that.
… read the rest
This article originally appeared on Collective Evolution.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-12--Austrian Police Raid 40 Suspects Accused of Spreading National Socialist Ideology

This Tuesday the interior ministry of Austria announced that it had used 150 officers to raid 40 people across the country .
It is illegal in Austria to tell the truth about history , expose jewish criminality , advocate for one ’ s folk , and propose tried-and-true solutions for fixing things .
This has been the case since Austria ’ s 1947 law banning any “ Nazi ” activity , and Austria is one of the most draconian countries in Europe when it comes to routing out any NS sympathizers .
The statement from the ministry says : Oy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in his home !
Send him to prison !
Honestly some of these people could have been arrested for simply sharing articles from this site or telling friends to watch Hellstorm .
The real crimes being committed here are against the Austrian people themselves .
This is not just happening in Austria , though .
As recently reported , European police are coordinating raids against people accused of committing thought crimes online .
Our enemies think they will win this war by crushing all dissent , but this will only prove our point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dedicated , and more clever in our tactics .
More and more people will start to see that we are right .
They will realize that this is a war for our very survival and that we must stand strong in defense of our people , regardless of the consequences with which the jewish supremacists threaten us .

This Tuesday the interior ministry of Austria announced that it had used 150 officers to raid 40 people across the country.
The Local reports:
All suspects are accused of offences under Austria’s law banning the spreading of Nazi ideology, with seven also accused of inciting hatred.
It is illegal in Austria to tell the truth about history, expose jewish criminality, advocate for one’s folk, and propose tried-and-true solutions for fixing things. This has been the case since Austria’s 1947 law banning any “Nazi” activity, and Austria is one of the most draconian countries in Europe when it comes to routing out any NS sympathizers.
The statement from the ministry says:
Mobile phones, data storage devices and other objects were seized in connection with the alleged crimes, including Nazi paraphernalia.
Oy vey, the NAZI had a swastika in his home! Send him to prison!
The alleged crimes took place on social media platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp as well as in other online spaces such as chat forums on internet gaming sites.
Honestly some of these people could have been arrested for simply sharing articles from this site or telling friends to watch Hellstorm. The real crimes being committed here are against the Austrian people themselves.
This is not just happening in Austria, though. As recently reported, European police are coordinating raids against people accused of committing thought crimes online.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/european-police-conduct-coordinated-raids-on-people-accused-of-online-hate-speech/
Our enemies think they will win this war by crushing all dissent, but this will only prove our point. We will grow stronger, more dedicated, and more clever in our tactics. More and more people will start to see that we are right. They will realize that this is a war for our very survival and that we must stand strong in defense of our people, regardless of the consequences with which the jewish supremacists threaten us.
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-11-13--George Floyd Exhibit Opens at Holocaust Museum

Two anti-white hoaxes for the price of one .
Both orchestrated by Jewish supremacists who hate white people .

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-13--Landscapes by James Arthur O’Connor

Landscapes by James Arthur O’Connor

James Arthur O ’ Connor ( 1792 – 1841 ) was the son of an engraver and printer .
He @ @ @ @ @ and took just a few lessons .
His skill enabled him to eventually travel to @ @ @ @ @ at the Royal Academy .
Regardless of his abilities , he died a poor man @

James Arthur O’Connor (1792 – 1841) was the son of an engraver and printer. He taught himself how to paint and took just a few lessons. His skill enabled him to eventually travel to London and exhibit his works at the Royal Academy. Regardless of his abilities, he died a poor man.
Stonehenge by Moonlight View of the Shannon View of Irishtown from Sandymount Landscape with a view of Drimnagh Castle Dargle Landscape with a Fisherman Two Figures in a Moonlit Landscape The Poachers A Moonlit Landscape The Field of Waterloo A traveler on a riverside road with a fisherman in the distance A View of the Valley of Rocks near Mittlach (Alsace) A Wooded River Landscape with Fishermen A Wooded River Landscape with Mother and Child Night Wooded Landscape A Wooded Landscape with Shepherd at Rest A Coastal Scene A Frost Piece
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt