Ophiolatreia in Britain

Renegade Editor ’ s Note : Take this dated text with a grain of salt .
From Ophiolatreia [ 1889 ] It will probably be a matter of surprise to many , but it is a fact that even in Britain in ancient times Ophiolatreia largely prevailed .
Deane says : “ Our British ancestors , under the tuition of the venerable Druids , were not only worshippers of the solar deity , symbolized by the serpent , but held the serpent , independent of his relation to the sun , in peculiar veneration .
Cut off from all intercourse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their remoteness and partly by their national character , the Britons retained their primitive idolatry long after it yielded in the neighbouring countries to the polytheistic corruptions of Greece and Egypt .
In process of time , however , the gods of the Gaulish Druids penetrated into the sacred mythology of the British and furnished personifications for the different attributes of the dracontic god Hu .
This deity was called “ The Dragon Ruler of the World ” and his car was drawn by serpents .
His priests in accomadation with the general @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called after him “ Adders.
” In a poem of Taliessin , translated by Davies , in his Appendix No .
6 , is the following enumeration of a Druid ’ s titles : — “ I am a Druid ; I am an architect ; I am a prophet ; From the word “ Gnadr ” is derived “ adder , ” the name of a species of snake .
Gnadr was probably pronounced like “ adder ” with a nasal aspirate .
The mythology of the Druids contained also a goddes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drawn by serpents .
It is conjectured that this was the Grecian “ Ceres ; ” and not without reason , for the interesting intercourse between the British and Gaulish Druids introduced into the purer religion of the former many of the corruptions ingrafted upon that of the latter by the Greeks and Romans .
The Druids of Gaul had among them many divinities corresponding with those of Greece and Rome .
They worshipped Ogmius ( a compound deity between Hercules and Mercury ) , and after him , Apollo , Mars , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resembling them .
Of these they made images ; whereas hitherto the only image in the British worship was the great wicker idol into which they thrust human victims designed to be burnt as an expiatory sacrifice for the sins of some chieftain .
The following translation of a Bardic poem , descriptive of one of their religious rites , identifies the superstition of the British Druids with the aboriginal Ophiolatreia , as expressed in the mysteries of Isis of Egypt .
The poem is entitled “ the Elegy of Uther Pendragon ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The Dragon ’ s Head ; ” and it is not a little remarkable that the word “ Draig ” in the British language signifies , at the same time , a fiery serpent , a dragon , and the Supreme God.
” In the second part of this poem is the following sacrificial rites of Uther Pendragon : —- With the lake next my side ; With my side moving round the sanctuary ; While the sanctuary is earnestly invoking The Gliding King , before whom the Fair One Retreats upon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; The places which contain vessels Whilst the drink offering is in the Golden Horns ; Whilst the golden horns are in the hand ; Whilst the knife is upon the chief victim , This is a most minute and interesting account of the religious rites of the Druids , proving in clear terms their addiction to Ophiolatreia : for we have not only the history of the “ Gliding King , ” who pursues “ The Fair One , ” depicted upon “ the veil which covers the huge stones ” —a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the events in Paradise , under a poetic garb ; but we have , likewise , beneath that veil , within the sacred circle of “ the huge stones , ” the “ Great Dragon , a Living Serpent , ” moving round the places which contain the vessels of drink-offering ; or in other words , moving round the altar stone in the same manner as the serpent in the Isiac mysteries passed about the sacred vessels containing the offerings .
The Golden Horns which contained the drink offerings were very probably @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Tundera , in Denmark .
The sanctity of the serpent showed itself in another very curious part of the superstition of the British Druids , namely , in that which related to the formation and virtues of the celebrated anguinum , as it is called by Pliny , or gleinen nadroeth , that is , “ snake-stones , ” as they were called by the Britons.
” Sir R. C. Hoare in his Modern Wiltshire , Hundred of Amesbury , gives an engraving of one , and says : “ This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circular lines of opaque skylight and white , which seem to represent a snake twined round a centre which is perforated.
” Mr. Lhwyd , the Welsh antiquary , writing to Ralph Thornley says : — “ I am fully satsified that they were amulets of the Druids .
I have seen one of them that had nine small snakes upon it .
There are others that have one or two or more snakes.
” A story comes to us , on Roman authority ( that of Pliny ) , that a knight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anguinum about his neck was ordered by Claudius to be put to death , it being believed that the influence would improperly wrest judgment in his favour .
Of this anguinum ( a word derived from anguis , a snake ) Pliny says : “ An infinite number of snakes , entwined together in the heat of summer , roll themselves into a mass , and from the saliva of their jaws and the froth of their bodies is engendered an egg , which is called ‘ anguinum.
’ By the violent hissing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the air , and the Druid destined to secure it , must catch it in his sacred vest before it reaches the ground.
” Information relative to the prevalence of this superstition in England will be found in Davies ’ Myths of the Druids , Camden ’ s Britannia , and Borlase ’ s Cornwall .
Perhaps the most remarkable of all British relics of this worship are to be found on the hills overlooking the village of Abury , in the county of Wiltshire .
There , twenty-six miles from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be found the remains of a great Serpentine Temple—one of the most imposing , as it certinaly is one of the most interesting , monuments of the British Islands .
It was first accurately described by Dr. Stukeley in 1793 in his celebrated work entitled Abury , a Temple of the British Druids .
It was afterwards carefully examined by Sir R. C. Hoare and an account published in his elaborate work Ancient Wiltshire .
Dr. Stukeley was the first to detect the design of the structure and his conclusions have been sustained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has succeeded him .
The temple of Abury consisted originally of a grand circumvallation of earth 1,400 feet in diameter , enclosing an area of upwards of twenty-two acres .
It has an inner ditch and the height of the embankment , measuring from the bottom of the ditch , is seventeen feet .
It is quite regular , though not an exact circle in form , and has four entrances at equal distances apart , though nearly at right angles to each other .
Within this grand circle were originally two double @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stones : a row of large stones , one hundred in number , was placed upon the inner brow of the ditch .
Extending upon either hand from this grand central structure were parallel lines of huge upright stones , constituting , upon each side , avenues upwards of a mile in length .
These formed the body of the serpent .
Each avenue consisted of two hundred stones .
The head of the serpent was represented by an oval structure consisting of two concentric lines of upright stones ; the outer line @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This head rests upon an eminence known as Overton , or Hakpen Hill , from which is commanded a view of the entire structure , winding back for more than two miles to the point of the tail , towards Bekhampton .
Hakpen in the old British dialects signifies Hak , serpent , and pen , head , i.e.
, Head of the Serpent .
“ To our name of Hakpen , ” says Stukeley , “ alludes ochim , called ‘ doleful creatures ’ in our translation.
” Isa ( 13 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ desolation of Babylon , says : Wild beasts of the desert shall lie there , and their houses shall be full of ochim , and owls shall dwell there , and satyrs shall dance there.
” St. Jerome translates it “ serpents.
” The Arabians call a serpent Haie , and wood-serpents Hageshin ; and thence our Hakpen ; Pen is “ head ” in British .
“ That the votaries of Ophiolatreia penetrated into every part of Britain is probable from the vestiges of some such idolatry even now to be found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Several obelisks remain in the vicinity of Aberdeen , Dundee and Perth , upon which appear devices strongly indicative of Ophiolatreia .
They are engraved in Gordon ” Itinerarium Septentrionale .
The serpent is a frequent and conspicuous hieroglyphic .
From the Runic characters traced upon some of these stones it is conjectured that they were erected by the Danes .
Such might have been the case ; but the Danes themselves were a sect of Ophites , and had not the people of the country been Ophites also , they might not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Remains indicating the presence of Serpent Worship in Ireland are extremely scarce , but we must remember the story prevalent in the country , accepted as truthful by a large majority of its inhabitants , that St. Patrick banished all snakes from Ireland by his prayers .
After all , this may mean nothing more than that by his preaching he overturned and uprooted the superstitious practices of the serpent worshippers of his times .

Renegade Editor’s Note: Take this dated text with a grain of salt.
From Ophiolatreia [1889]
It will probably be a matter of surprise to many, but it is a fact that even in Britain in ancient times Ophiolatreia largely prevailed. Deane says: “Our British ancestors, under the tuition of the venerable Druids, were not only worshippers of the solar deity, symbolized by the serpent, but held the serpent, independent of his relation to the sun, in peculiar veneration. Cut off from all intercourse with the civilized world, partly by their remoteness and partly by their national character, the Britons retained their primitive idolatry long after it yielded in the neighbouring countries to the polytheistic corruptions of Greece and Egypt. In process of time, however, the gods of the Gaulish Druids penetrated into the sacred mythology of the British and furnished personifications for the different attributes of the dracontic god Hu. This deity was called “The Dragon Ruler of the World” and his car was drawn by serpents. His priests in accomadation with the general custom of the Ophite god, were called after him “Adders.”
In a poem of Taliessin, translated by Davies, in his Appendix No. 6, is the following enumeration of a Druid’s titles:—
“I am a Druid; I am an architect; I am a prophet;
I am a serpent” (Gnadr).
From the word “Gnadr” is derived “adder,” the name of a species of snake. Gnadr was probably pronounced like “adder” with a nasal aspirate.
The mythology of the Druids contained also a goddes “Ceridwen,” whose car was drawn by serpents. It is conjectured that this was the Grecian “Ceres;” and not without reason, for the interesting intercourse between the British and Gaulish Druids introduced into the purer religion of the former many of the corruptions ingrafted upon that of the latter by the Greeks and Romans. The Druids of Gaul had among them many divinities corresponding with those of Greece and Rome. They worshipped Ogmius (a compound deity between Hercules and Mercury), and after him, Apollo, Mars, Jupiter, and Minerva, or deities resembling them. Of these they made images; whereas hitherto the only image in the British worship was the great wicker idol into which they thrust human victims designed to be burnt as an expiatory sacrifice for the sins of some chieftain.
The following translation of a Bardic poem, descriptive of one of their religious rites, identifies the superstition of the British Druids with the aboriginal Ophiolatreia, as expressed in the mysteries of Isis of Egypt. The poem is entitled “the Elegy of Uther Pendragon;” that is, of Uther, “The Dragon’s Head;” and it is not a little remarkable that the word “Draig” in the British language signifies, at the same time, a fiery serpent, a dragon, and the Supreme God.”
In the second part of this poem is the following sacrificial rites of Uther Pendragon:—-
“With solemn festivity round the two lakes;
With the lake next my side;
With my side moving round the sanctuary;
While the sanctuary is earnestly invoking
The Gliding King, before whom the Fair One
Retreats upon the veil that covers the huge stones;
Whilst the Dragon moves round over
The places which contain vessels
Of drink offering;
Whilst the drink offering is in the Golden Horns;
Whilst the golden horns are in the hand;
Whilst the knife is upon the chief victim,
Sincerely I implore thee, O victorious Bell, etc., etc.,”
This is a most minute and interesting account of the religious rites of the Druids, proving in clear terms their addiction to Ophiolatreia: for we have not only the history of the “Gliding King,” who pursues “The Fair One,” depicted upon “the veil which covers the huge stones”—a history which reminds us most forcibly of the events in Paradise, under a poetic garb; but we have, likewise, beneath that veil, within the sacred circle of “the huge stones,” the “Great Dragon, a Living Serpent,” moving round the places which contain the vessels of drink-offering; or in other words, moving round the altar stone in the same manner as the serpent in the Isiac mysteries passed about the sacred vessels containing the offerings.
The Golden Horns which contained the drink offerings were very probably of the same kind as that found in Tundera, in Denmark.
The sanctity of the serpent showed itself in another very curious part of the superstition of the British Druids, namely, in that which related to the formation and virtues of the celebrated anguinum, as it is called by Pliny, or gleinen nadroeth, that is, “snake-stones,” as they were called by the Britons.” Sir R. C. Hoare in his Modern Wiltshire, Hundred of Amesbury, gives an engraving of one, and says: “This is a head of imperfect vitrification representing two circular lines of opaque skylight and white, which seem to represent a snake twined round a centre which is perforated.” Mr. Lhwyd, the Welsh antiquary, writing to Ralph Thornley says:—“I am fully satsified that they were amulets of the Druids. I have seen one of them that had nine small snakes upon it. There are others that have one or two or more snakes.”
A story comes to us, on Roman authority (that of Pliny), that a knight entering a court of justice wearing an anguinum about his neck was ordered by Claudius to be put to death, it being believed that the influence would improperly wrest judgment in his favour.
Of this anguinum (a word derived from anguis, a snake) Pliny says: “An infinite number of snakes, entwined together in the heat of summer, roll themselves into a mass, and from the saliva of their jaws and the froth of their bodies is engendered an egg, which is called ‘anguinum.’ By the violent hissing of the serpents the egg is forced into the air, and the Druid destined to secure it, must catch it in his sacred vest before it reaches the ground.”
Information relative to the prevalence of this superstition in England will be found in Davies’ Myths of the Druids, Camden’s Britannia, and Borlase’s Cornwall.
Perhaps the most remarkable of all British relics of this worship are to be found on the hills overlooking the village of Abury, in the county of Wiltshire. There, twenty-six miles from the celebrated ruins of Stonehenge, are to be found the remains of a great Serpentine Temple—one of the most imposing, as it certinaly is one of the most interesting, monuments of the British Islands. It was first accurately described by Dr. Stukeley in 1793 in his celebrated work entitled Abury, a Temple of the British Druids. It was afterwards carefully examined by Sir R. C. Hoare and an account published in his elaborate work Ancient Wiltshire. Dr. Stukeley was the first to detect the design of the structure and his conclusions have been sustained by the observations of every antiquary who has succeeded him.
The temple of Abury consisted originally of a grand circumvallation of earth 1,400 feet in diameter, enclosing an area of upwards of twenty-two acres. It has an inner ditch and the height of the embankment, measuring from the bottom of the ditch, is seventeen feet. It is quite regular, though not an exact circle in form, and has four entrances at equal distances apart, though nearly at right angles to each other. Within this grand circle were originally two double or concentric circles composed of massive upright stones: a row of large stones, one hundred in number, was placed upon the inner brow of the ditch. Extending upon either hand from this grand central structure were parallel lines of huge upright stones, constituting, upon each side, avenues upwards of a mile in length. These formed the body of the serpent. Each avenue consisted of two hundred stones. The head of the serpent was represented by an oval structure consisting of two concentric lines of upright stones; the outer line containing forty, the inner eighteen stones. This head rests upon an eminence known as Overton, or Hakpen Hill, from which is commanded a view of the entire structure, winding back for more than two miles to the point of the tail, towards Bekhampton.
Hakpen in the old British dialects signifies Hak, serpent, and pen, head, i.e., Head of the Serpent. “To our name of Hakpen,” says Stukeley, “alludes ochim, called ‘doleful creatures’ in our translation.” Isa (13 v. 21), speaking of the desolation of Babylon, says: Wild beasts of the desert shall lie there, and their houses shall be full of ochim, and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there.” St. Jerome translates it “serpents.” The Arabians call a serpent Haie, and wood-serpents Hageshin; and thence our Hakpen; Pen is “head” in British.
“That the votaries of Ophiolatreia penetrated into every part of Britain is probable from the vestiges of some such idolatry even now to be found in Scotland and the western isles. Several obelisks remain in the vicinity of Aberdeen, Dundee and Perth, upon which appear devices strongly indicative of Ophiolatreia. They are engraved in Gordon” Itinerarium Septentrionale. The serpent is a frequent and conspicuous hieroglyphic. From the Runic characters traced upon some of these stones it is conjectured that they were erected by the Danes. Such might have been the case; but the Danes themselves were a sect of Ophites, and had not the people of the country been Ophites also, they might not have suffered these monuments to remain.”
Remains indicating the presence of Serpent Worship in Ireland are extremely scarce, but we must remember the story prevalent in the country, accepted as truthful by a large majority of its inhabitants, that St. Patrick banished all snakes from Ireland by his prayers. After all, this may mean nothing more than that by his preaching he overturned and uprooted the superstitious practices of the serpent worshippers of his times.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-23--Biden Has Filled His Foreign Policy Team With Weapons Contractors

The overseas wars that the US military has been involved with for nearly two decades have been unpopular with the American public for a very long time .
Both Obama and Trump campaigned on promises of ending the wars , or at the very least significantly scaling them back .
However , while both administrations oversaw small and ceremonial troop withdrawals , the US military ’ s involvement overseas did not slow down and didn ’ t seem to miss a beat from the Bush era .
Joe Biden has made some very similar promises while on the campaign trail @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden said , “ It ’ s past time to end the Forever Wars , which have cost us untold blood and treasure.
” However , he was vice president in the Obama administration , which oversaw wars in Yemen , Libya , Afghanistan , and numerous other countries , and he has also indicated that he has no intention of fully pulling out of Afghanistan .
On November 10th , Biden announced the members of his agency review teams , which he says “ are responsible for understanding the operations of each @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power , and preparing for President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect Harris and their cabinet to hit the ground running on Day One.
” A large portion of the officials who were selected for the Department of Defense agency review team , 8 out of 23 , have direct ties to the military industrial complex or a part of it themselves .
This number could be higher , as the backgrounds of all of the candidates are still being thoroughly researched .
The Center for Strategic and International Studies ( CSIS ) is listed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for three selections on Biden ’ s Department of Defense agency review team : Kathleen Hicks , who is a former defense official under President Barack Obama , as well as Melissa Dalton , and Andrew Hunter .
CSIS is an influential foreign policy think tank that promotes war while receiving funding from companies like General Dynamics Corporation , Raytheon Technologies , Northrop Grumman Corporation , and Lockheed Martin .
They also work on behalf of the oil companies .
Furthermore , two other officials , Ely Ratner and Susanna Blume also named @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently worked with the Center for a New American Security ( CNAS ) a think tank that takes money from Northrop Grumman , Raytheon , Lockheed Martin and the US State Department .
Three others selected for the team are Stacie Pettyjohn , Terri Tanielian , and Christine Wormuth who previously worked with the RAND Corporation , which receives funding from the US Army and the Department of Homeland Security and often promote foreign intervention and hostility towards non-allied countries .
Ben Freeman of the Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative , which recently authored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said that “ It ’ s telling the think tanks represented here — RAND , CSIS , and CNAS — are among the top recipients of Department of Defense and Department of Defense contractor funding .
CNAS and CSIS are literally number one and number two in terms of donations received from US defense contractors in the last six years .
RAND is , by far , the top recipient of Department of Defense funding of any think tank.
” Sharon Burke , also on Biden ’ s team , works for New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Northrop Grumman , General Atomics Aeronautical Systems , and US Army War College .
Another pick for the team , Shawn Skelly , recently worked with CACI International , a company that provides information technology for US military weapons systems .
Team member Victor Garcia has a background in cybersecurity for the US government , previously working with a software company called Rebellion Defense that says it helps “ our defense and national security agencies unlock the power of data across all domains.
” The software company was reportedly founded by former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gathered from drones .
Other members of the team are also heavily involved in Wall Street and the oil industry .

By John Vibes
The overseas wars that the US military has been involved with for nearly two decades have been unpopular with the American public for a very long time. Both Obama and Trump campaigned on promises of ending the wars, or at the very least significantly scaling them back. However, while both administrations oversaw small and ceremonial troop withdrawals, the US military’s involvement overseas did not slow down and didn’t seem to miss a beat from the Bush era.
Joe Biden has made some very similar promises while on the campaign trail in 2019. In one speech, Biden said, “It’s past time to end the Forever Wars, which have cost us untold blood and treasure.”
However, he was vice president in the Obama administration, which oversaw wars in Yemen, Libya, Afghanistan, and numerous other countries, and he has also indicated that he has no intention of fully pulling out of Afghanistan.
On November 10th, Biden announced the members of his agency review teams, which he says “are responsible for understanding the operations of each agency, ensuring a smooth transfer of power, and preparing for President-elect Biden and Vice President-elect Harris and their cabinet to hit the ground running on Day One.”
A large portion of the officials who were selected for the Department of Defense agency review team, 8 out of 23, have direct ties to the military industrial complex or a part of it themselves. This number could be higher, as the backgrounds of all of the candidates are still being thoroughly researched.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is listed as the “most recent employment” for three selections on Biden’s Department of Defense agency review team: Kathleen Hicks, who is a former defense official under President Barack Obama, as well as Melissa Dalton, and Andrew Hunter.
CSIS is an influential foreign policy think tank that promotes war while receiving funding from companies like General Dynamics Corporation, Raytheon Technologies, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and Lockheed Martin. They also work on behalf of the oil companies.
Furthermore, two other officials, Ely Ratner and Susanna Blume also named for positions on the team, most recently worked with the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) a think tank that takes money from Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and the US State Department.
Three others selected for the team are Stacie Pettyjohn, Terri Tanielian, and Christine Wormuth who previously worked with the RAND Corporation, which receives funding from the US Army and the Department of Homeland Security and often promote foreign intervention and hostility towards non-allied countries.
Ben Freeman of the Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative, which recently authored a report on think tank funding, said that “It’s telling the think tanks represented here — RAND, CSIS, and CNAS — are among the top recipients of Department of Defense and Department of Defense contractor funding. CNAS and CSIS are literally number one and number two in terms of donations received from US defense contractors in the last six years. RAND is, by far, the top recipient of Department of Defense funding of any think tank.”
Sharon Burke, also on Biden’s team, works for New America, which receives funding from Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, and US Army War College. Another pick for the team, Shawn Skelly, recently worked with CACI International, a company that provides information technology for US military weapons systems. Team member Victor Garcia has a background in cybersecurity for the US government, previously working with a software company called Rebellion Defense that says it helps “our defense and national security agencies unlock the power of data across all domains.”
The software company was reportedly founded by former defense officials and works to analyze video gathered from drones.
Other members of the team are also heavily involved in Wall Street and the oil industry.
Source: The Mind Unleashed
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


The Holocaust Revisionists

The claims of the revisionists Everyone today knows that there is a group of people who radically question the prevalent image of the fate of the jews under the Third Reich .
These people call themselves “ Revisionists ” , or , more precisely , “ Holocaust Revisionists ” .
The media bespatters them with idiotic smear words like “ Auschwitz Deniers ” , and lumps them together with “ Right-wing Radicals ” .
If you were to ask the average German what the revisionists actually say , and what they their statements are based on , he would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inevitable because of strict media control ; the media have strict instructions not to permit any expression or discussion of revisionist arguments .
Thus , many people are given the completely erroneous impression that the revisionists deny jewish suffering during the Second World War .
In reality , no one denies that a considerable number of jews under German rule were interned in concentration camps , or that large numbers of deportees died of epidemics and exhaustion .
Nor does anyone deny the reality of shootings of jews , particularly , on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three points in particular : 1 ) that there was a plan for the physical liquidation of the jews ; 2 ) the existence of “ extermination camps ” with gas chambers for mass killing of human beings ; 3 ) that five to six million jews died in German occupied Europe .
It is also not true that revisionism is a “ Right-wing radical ” movement , since it is not an ideology .
It is , as Prof. Robert Faurisson likes to say , a method .
Revisionists examine the official @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same methods which are generally recognized as valid for other historical periods .
Of course , it is also true that most revisionists are politically to the Right , and that some of them are acknowledged National Socialists , but this has no influence on the correctness or incorrectness of their arguments .
Whether the discoverer of a new planet is conservative , liberal , socialist , or Communist , is irrelevant to the history of science .
What counts is the discovery of a new planet !
Furthermore , some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Frenchmen Serge Thion and Pierre Guillaume , are on the Left .
The founder of revisionism also came from the left .
Paul Rassinier , a French resistance fighter , a Socialist and detainee at Buchenwald and Dora-Mittelbau concentration camps .
In his book Le Mensonge d ’ Ulysse ( the Lies of Ulysses ) , which appeared in 1950 , Rassinier denounced the endlessly exaggerated tales told by former inmates of German camps .
Over the course of years of research , Rassinier finally came to the conclusion that gassings had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or had taken place only as the act of a few lunatics .
In Le Drame des Juifs europeens ( 1964 ) , Rassinier wrote a few years before his death ( 1 ) : “ For 15 years , every time that I heard of a witness anywhere , no matter where in the portion of Europe that was not occupied by the Soviets , who claimed to have himself been present at gas exterminations , I immediately went to him to get his testimony .
With documentation in hand , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detailed questions that soon it became apparent that he could not answer except by lying .
Often his lies became so transparent , even to himself , that he ended his testimony by declaring that he had not seen it himself , but that one of his good friends , who had died in the camps and whose good faith he could not doubt , had told him about it .
I covered thousands and thousands of kilometers throughout Europe in this way .
Since nobody else wanted to print Rassinier ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by a publishing house closely associated with the “ Extreme Right ” ( Les Sept Couleurs ) .
The hypocrites who reproach him for having them published them there , would no doubt have preferred to see them never published at all .
If we observe the campaign against the revisionists carried on by the media clique , we immediately note a series of remarkable features : First , revisionist literature is flatly stated to have no credibility at all .
Thus , a Swiss women named Klara Obermueller wrote as follows in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ If somebody came along today and reported the calling of a scientific congress to examine the question of whether the sun revolves around the earth or the earth around the sun , he would either be ridiculed or declared non-compos mentis .
It wouldn ’ t occur to anyone to discuss the matter seriously… A similar thing occurs with the propagandists of the so-called ‘ Auschwitz Lie ’ or ‘ Holocaust Lie ’ : their statements that there was no extermination of the jews , is so obviously false that it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ According to the above , the revisionists are purely and simply crazy .
So why persecute them ?
Why not just ignore them ?
Do people take you to court if you say the earth doesn ’ t revolve around the sun ?
Peculiarly , these same lunatics appear to be highly dangerous to the “ Western democracies ” ; they even appear to threaten the very basis of that society in an extremely serious way .
A hack journalist named Patrick Bahners , writing in the Frankerfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on 15 August @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Guenter Deckert , revisionist and Chairman of the NPD , by the German legal system , said : “ If Deckert ’ s attitude on the Holocaust were correct , the Bundesrepublik would be based on a lie .
Every Presidential speech , every minute of silence , every history book would be a lie .
Therefore , anyone who denies the mass murder of the jews dispute the legitimacy of the Bundesrepublik.
” How can a handful of lunatics endanger the legitimacy of the Bundesrepublic ?
No , the journalists must finally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this argument : either the revisionists are lunatics , in which case they aren ’ t dangerous , and the journalists can spare the energy wasted on all their hysterical hate campaigns ; or they are highly dangerous to the ruling system of the West , in which case they are not lunatics !
You can ’ t have it both ways ; the media must decide one or the other .
State prosecutors and judges as watch dogs for the official version of history The matter becomes even more suspicious when we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( a more correct term would be “ disputing the genocide of the jews ” ) are liable for criminal prosecution in several European countries ( 3 ) .
The model for this impudent interference of the criminal justice system in the freedom of research is perhaps the French “ Loi Gayssot ” , passed in France in 1990 ( 4 ) , which provides for criminal penalties for anyone disputing any matter decided by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg .
The sentence of the Nuremberg victor ’ s tribunal has therefore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been canonized , as it were .
Even Stalin did nothing of the kind .
In the BRD , revisionists are prosecuted according to paragraph 130 of the Criminal Code ( “ Incitement to Racial Hatred ” ) Paragraph 131 ( “ Slandering the Dead ” ) and paragraph 189 ( “ Slandering the Dead ” ) .
The first paragraph was considerably broadened on 28 October 1994 , and now calls for prison terms of up to five years for anyone who approves , denies , or trivializes any criminal act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ National Socialists .
Since that date , there have been thousands of trials of revisionists in Germany just since 28 October 1994 .
In Austria , the so-called “ Prohibition Law ” against National Socialist activities has served as the Hexenhammer in suppressing the freedom of research on the Holocaust since 1992 .
In France , Holocaust revisionists are liable for imprisonment for one year ; in the BRD , five years ; and in Austria , ten years .
In practice , however , the penalties are not that severe .
Not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some particularly spectacular revisionist trials in the BRD : – in October 1992 , Major General Remer , one of the most highly decorated soldiers of WWII , was sentenced to 22 months without probation in Schweinfurt for “ Holocaust Denial ” , which , for the seriously ill old man , would have been equivalent to a death sentence ( Aktenzeichen Remer 1 Kls 8 Js 7494/91 ) .
Rather than serve the sentence , Remer , accompanied by his wife , went into exile in Spain ; – in April 1995 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NPD , was sentenced to two years without probation for translating a technical talk by US gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter ( Aktenzeichen IV Kls 1/95 – 2AK 1/95 ) .
That Deckert laughed several times during the translation , and shortened the sacrosanct Holy Word “ Holocaust ” to “ Holo ” for short , was considered to have aggravated the offense ( 5 ) ; – in June 1995 , the chemist Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months imprisonment without probation in Stuttgart ( Aktenzeichen 17 Kls 83/94 ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Major General Remer had sent Rudolf ’ s report on the “ gas chambers ” at Auschwitz ( see chapter XII ) to politicians , professors , and the media ( 6 ) ; – in May 1996 , the publisher Wigbert Grabert was fined 30,000 DM for publishing a scientific revisionist anthology with the title Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte ( Aktenzeichen AG Tuebingen 4 Gs 173/95 ) – in May 1996 , the political scientist and publisher Udo Walendy was sentenced to 15 months without probation ( Aktenzeichen 2 Kls 46 Js @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Holocaust ” ( 7 ) .
In none of these terror trials did the court spend as much as one single second considering the arguments of the defendants .
Every case assumed the “ Offenkundigkeit ” of the Holocaust , i.e.
, its alleged status as a “ proven fact ” .
This “ Offenkundigkeit ” , believe it or not , dates back to 1945 !
According to article 21 of the London Statutes of August 1945 , which established the procedural rules for the Nuremberg Trials , no proof was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” .
Just what constituted a “ fact of common knowledge ” was , of course , decided by the court itself — a court which , in the words of chief prosecutor Robert Jackson , considered its actions a “ continuation of the war against Germany ” ( 8 ) .
Thus , the status of the “ Offenkundigkeit ” of an assembly-line extermination of the jews with millions of victims , was simply considered to be a “ fact of common knowledge ” , for which , therefore , no proof @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eyewitness testimonies ” is available today .
All these trials violate the basic right to free expression of opinion as guaranteed under the Constitutions of all the states concerned .
It is also illegal to deny a defendant any opportunity to prove the truth of his statements ; instead , expert reports on the technical impossibilities of the reported mass extermination are always rejected with reference to the “ Offenkundigkeit ” of the Holocaust .
Generally , the very notion that jurists are competent to decide matters of historical fact is grotesque in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : In the book Hat Karl der Grosse Je Gelebt ?
[ Was There Ever Really a Charlemagne ? ]
( 9 ) , the Munich scholar Herbert Illig disputes the existence of Charlemagne , and declares the whole period from 614 to 911 A.D. to be a product of fantasy .
This entire period of 297 years , together with Charlemagne and all the other historical figures of the same period , are alleged to have been invented by subsequent falsifiers of history for political reasons .
The absence of any structures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Dark Ages ” is the logical result of the non-existence of this period of history : an analysis of architectural monuments is said to show that the few structures alleged to have been built during this period , were , in reality , built later .
Due to an insufficient familiarity with the history of the early Middle Ages on our part , we shall refrain from expressing an opinion as to the value of Illig ’ s book .
If his arguments should prove to be sheer fantasy , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prove correct , the author will be sooner or later have to be recognized as a genius .
There is another , third possibility , i.e.
, that Charlemagne actually lived , but never performed many of the heroic deeds attributed to him .
In this case , Illig ’ s work would still have a seminal influence upon the writing of history by pointing out its shortcomings — particularly , an overly blind trust in the reliability of the sources employed .
One thing is for certain : Illig will never be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
No judge will ever jail him for “ Denying the Genocide of the Pagans ” , although , by disputing Charlemagne ’ s existence , he is , in effect , denying the mass murder of Saxon pagans attributed to him .
In short , Charlemagne , or any other historical subject for that matter , may be researched with complete freedom and the broadest possible latitude .
The same statement is true of every other period of history — except the Second World War , and , in particular , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reich .
This fact alone ought to make every thinking person deeply suspicious : “ truths ” that require protection by criminal law usually turn out to be lies .
The bankruptcy of the official version of history “ Historians have only interpreted the Holocaust .
The thing is to research it.
” Ulrich Herbert , German historian , in the Frankfurter Rundschau of 13 February 1997 , p. 7 .
The Lausanne daily Nouveau Quotidien on 2 and 3 September 1996 , published two articles by the historian Jacques Baynac ( an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ promising title “ How the Historians Turned the Job of Silencing the Revisionists Over to the Courts ” .
That means : the governmental persecution of revisionists described above is the logical consequence of the inability of orthodox historians to come up with any counter-argument with which to answer the revisionists .
While revisionists RESEARCH the Holocaust , historians are simply content to INTERPRET it .
The facts are irrelevant .
An excellent example of this may be seen in Gunnar Heinsohn ’ s book Warum Auschwitz ?
[ Why Auschwitz ? ]
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ beginning of the book , Heinsohn mentions an alleged Himmler order issued on 25 November 1944 on the disassembly of the gas chambers at Auschwitz .
This Himmler order has haunted Holocaust literature for decades .
No source for it is ever given , since no such order has ever been found .
We don ’ t know which historian invented this lie , since the Holocaust scribblers simply copy all their nonsense back and forth .
With mock seriousness , Heinsohn lists “ Two Hundred Forty Recognized Theories on Auschwitz ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the book ( “ Theory no .
20 : Auschwitz as the Punishment of the jews for Worshipping Female Deities ” Theory no .
33 : “ Auschwitz as Preparation for the Restoration of Israel So That All Surviving jews May Gather Together and Fulfil the Conditions for the Coming of the End Days Through the Christian God ” , etc.
, etc ) .
He finally comes to the conclusion that Hitler wished to exterminate the jews because he hoped that , “ with the disappearance of the jews of flesh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sanctity of life , as well as the Commandments of love and righteousness , would be lost .
He wished to create the right to kill , in order to create strategic advantages for the Germans in the conquering of living space ” ( cover blurb ) .
In the Middle Ages , scholars engaged in complex disputes as to how many angels could dance on the head of a pin .
The existence of angels was never cast in doubt , and never proven ; it was simply assumed as an axiom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way .
The existence of an “ assembly line mass extermination ” is assumed as an axiom , without any regard to the need for proof .
They then proceed to speculate in a vacuum , far removed from historical realities , on the psychological and sociological factors which led to the assembly-line killing of jews in the third Reich ” , etc.
, etc.
, just as medieval scholars speculated upon the sex of the number of angels dancing on the pinhead .
Revisionists ask very different questions , such as : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
How reliable are the eyewitnesses ?
What was the capacity of the crematoria ?
How quickly does Zyklon B evaporate , and at which temperatures ?
Did the “ gas chambers ” possess an efficient ventilation system ?
How did the Zyklon B enter the “ gas chambers ” ?
Are there any traces of cyanides in the mortar samples from the “ gas chambers ” ?
In other words , on the one hand , are reason and logic ; on the other , stands primitive superstition .
There is no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
That is why the historians , to borrow a phrase from Baynac , have turned the job of silencing the revisionists over to the courts .
3 ) So far ( early 1997 ) Switzerland , Belgium , and Spain have passed anti-revisionist muzzle laws in addition to France , Germany , and Austria .
In Belgium and Spain , however , there appears to be little danger of their being used — for the moment .
5 ) See , in this regard , Gunther Anntohn/Henri Roques , Der Fall Guenter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Weinheim 1995 .
6 ) See , in this regard no .
Herbert Verbeke ( publisher ) Kardinalfragen zur Zeitgeschichte , Vrij Historisch Onderzoek , Berchem 1996 .
7 ) Compare , in this regard , issue no .
69 of Historischen Tatsachen .

Holocaust or Hoax?
The Revisionists
by Jürgen Graf
The claims of the revisionists
Everyone today knows that there is a group of people who radically question the prevalent image of the fate of the jews under the Third Reich. These people call themselves “Revisionists”, or, more precisely, “Holocaust Revisionists”. The media bespatters them with idiotic smear words like “Auschwitz Deniers”, and lumps them together with “Right-wing Radicals”.
If you were to ask the average German what the revisionists actually say, and what they their statements are based on, he would be unable to answer. This is quite inevitable because of strict media control; the media have strict instructions not to permit any expression or discussion of revisionist arguments. Thus, many people are given the completely erroneous impression that the revisionists deny jewish suffering during the Second World War. In reality, no one denies that a considerable number of jews under German rule were interned in concentration camps, or that large numbers of deportees died of epidemics and exhaustion. Nor does anyone deny the reality of shootings of jews, particularly, on the Eastern Front.
Revisionists dispute the following three points in particular:
1) that there was a plan for the physical liquidation of the jews;
2) the existence of “extermination camps” with gas chambers for mass killing of human beings;
3) that five to six million jews died in German occupied Europe.
It is also not true that revisionism is a “Right-wing radical” movement, since it is not an ideology. It is, as Prof. Robert Faurisson likes to say, a method. Revisionists examine the official picture of the “Holocaust” using the same methods which are generally recognized as valid for other historical periods.
Of course, it is also true that most revisionists are politically to the Right, and that some of them are acknowledged National Socialists, but this has no influence on the correctness or incorrectness of their arguments. Whether the discoverer of a new planet is conservative, liberal, socialist, or Communist, is irrelevant to the history of science. What counts is the discovery of a new planet!
Furthermore, some of the best-known revisionists, for example, the Frenchmen Serge Thion and Pierre Guillaume, are on the Left.
A former concentration camp inmate as revisionist pioneer:
Paul Rassinier
The founder of revisionism also came from the left. Paul Rassinier, a French resistance fighter, a Socialist and detainee at Buchenwald and Dora-Mittelbau concentration camps. In his book Le Mensonge d’Ulysse (the Lies of Ulysses), which appeared in 1950, Rassinier denounced the endlessly exaggerated tales told by former inmates of German camps. Over the course of years of research, Rassinier finally came to the conclusion that gassings had either not taken place at all, or had taken place only as the act of a few lunatics. In Le Drame des Juifs europeens (1964), Rassinier wrote a few years before his death (1):
“For 15 years, every time that I heard of a witness anywhere, no matter where in the portion of Europe that was not occupied by the Soviets, who claimed to have himself been present at gas exterminations, I immediately went to him to get his testimony. With documentation in hand, I would ask him so many precise and detailed questions that soon it became apparent that he could not answer except by lying. Often his lies became so transparent, even to himself, that he ended his testimony by declaring that he had not seen it himself, but that one of his good friends, who had died in the camps and whose good faith he could not doubt, had told him about it. I covered thousands and thousands of kilometers throughout Europe in this way.
Since nobody else wanted to print Rassinier’s works, he finally had them published by a publishing house closely associated with the “Extreme Right” (Les Sept Couleurs). The hypocrites who reproach him for having them published them there, would no doubt have preferred to see them never published at all.
Media vilification of the revisionists
If we observe the campaign against the revisionists carried on by the media clique, we immediately note a series of remarkable features:
First, revisionist literature is flatly stated to have no credibility at all. Thus, a Swiss women named Klara Obermueller wrote as follows in an anti-revisionist series (2):
“If somebody came along today and reported the calling of a scientific congress to examine the question of whether the sun revolves around the earth or the earth around the sun, he would either be ridiculed or declared non-compos mentis. It wouldn’t occur to anyone to discuss the matter seriously… A similar thing occurs with the propagandists of the so-called ‘Auschwitz Lie’ or ‘Holocaust Lie’: their statements that there was no extermination of the jews, is so obviously false that it is basically unworthy of serious scientific discussion.”
According to the above, the revisionists are purely and simply crazy. So why persecute them? Why not just ignore them? Do people take you to court if you say the earth doesn’t revolve around the sun?
Peculiarly, these same lunatics appear to be highly dangerous to the “Western democracies”; they even appear to threaten the very basis of that society in an extremely serious way. A hack journalist named Patrick Bahners, writing in the Frankerfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on 15 August 1994 in connection with the sentencing of Guenter Deckert, revisionist and Chairman of the NPD, by the German legal system, said:
“If Deckert’s attitude on the Holocaust were correct, the Bundesrepublik would be based on a lie. Every Presidential speech, every minute of silence, every history book would be a lie. Therefore, anyone who denies the mass murder of the jews dispute the legitimacy of the Bundesrepublik.”
How can a handful of lunatics endanger the legitimacy of the Bundesrepublic? No, the journalists must finally recognize that there is something askew in this argument: either the revisionists are lunatics, in which case they aren’t dangerous, and the journalists can spare the energy wasted on all their hysterical hate campaigns; or they are highly dangerous to the ruling system of the West, in which case they are not lunatics! You can’t have it both ways; the media must decide one or the other.
State prosecutors and judges as watch dogs for the official version of history
The matter becomes even more suspicious when we learn that “denying” the Holocaust (a more correct term would be “disputing the genocide of the jews”) are liable for criminal prosecution in several European countries (3). The model for this impudent interference of the criminal justice system in the freedom of research is perhaps the French “Loi Gayssot”, passed in France in 1990 (4), which provides for criminal penalties for anyone disputing any matter decided by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. The sentence of the Nuremberg victor’s tribunal has therefore been declared infallible in France; it has been canonized, as it were. Even Stalin did nothing of the kind.
In the BRD, revisionists are prosecuted according to paragraph 130 of the Criminal Code (“Incitement to Racial Hatred”) Paragraph 131 (“Slandering the Dead”) and paragraph 189 (“Slandering the Dead”). The first paragraph was considerably broadened on 28 October 1994, and now calls for prison terms of up to five years for anyone who approves, denies, or trivializes any criminal act alleged to have been committed by the National Socialists. Since that date, there have been thousands of trials of revisionists in Germany just since 28 October 1994.
In Austria, the so-called “Prohibition Law” against National Socialist activities has served as the Hexenhammer in suppressing the freedom of research on the Holocaust since 1992.
In France, Holocaust revisionists are liable for imprisonment for one year; in the BRD, five years; and in Austria, ten years. In practice, however, the penalties are not that severe. Not yet!
Here are the sentences from some particularly spectacular revisionist trials in the BRD:
– in October 1992, Major General Remer, one of the most highly decorated soldiers of WWII, was sentenced to 22 months without probation in Schweinfurt for “Holocaust Denial”, which, for the seriously ill old man, would have been equivalent to a death sentence (Aktenzeichen Remer 1 Kls 8 Js 7494/91). Rather than serve the sentence, Remer, accompanied by his wife, went into exile in Spain;
– in April 1995, Guenter Deckert, Chaiman of the NPD, was sentenced to two years without probation for translating a technical talk by US gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter (Aktenzeichen IV Kls 1/95 – 2AK 1/95). That Deckert laughed several times during the translation, and shortened the sacrosanct Holy Word “Holocaust” to “Holo” for short, was considered to have aggravated the offense (5);
– in June 1995, the chemist Germar Rudolf was sentenced to 14 months imprisonment without probation in Stuttgart (Aktenzeichen 17 Kls 83/94). This sentence was passed on the pretext that Major General Remer had sent Rudolf’s report on the “gas chambers” at Auschwitz (see chapter XII) to politicians, professors, and the media (6);
– in May 1996, the publisher Wigbert Grabert was fined 30,000 DM for publishing a scientific revisionist anthology with the title Grundlagen zur Zeitgeschichte (Aktenzeichen AG Tuebingen 4 Gs 173/95)
– in May 1996, the political scientist and publisher Udo Walendy was sentenced to 15 months without probation (Aktenzeichen 2 Kls 46 Js 374/95 STA Bielefeld) for “trivializing the Holocaust” (7).
In none of these terror trials did the court spend as much as one single second considering the arguments of the defendants. Every case assumed the “Offenkundigkeit” of the Holocaust, i.e., its alleged status as a “proven fact”. This “Offenkundigkeit”, believe it or not, dates back to 1945! According to article 21 of the London Statutes of August 1945, which established the procedural rules for the Nuremberg Trials, no proof was required of “facts of common knowledge”. Just what constituted a “fact of common knowledge” was, of course, decided by the court itself — a court which, in the words of chief prosecutor Robert Jackson, considered its actions a “continuation of the war against Germany” (8). Thus, the status of the “Offenkundigkeit” of an assembly-line extermination of the jews with millions of victims, was simply considered to be a “fact of common knowledge”, for which, therefore, no proof other than “confessions” and “eyewitness testimonies” is available today.
All these trials violate the basic right to free expression of opinion as guaranteed under the Constitutions of all the states concerned. It is also illegal to deny a defendant any opportunity to prove the truth of his statements; instead, expert reports on the technical impossibilities of the reported mass extermination are always rejected with reference to the “Offenkundigkeit” of the Holocaust.
Generally, the very notion that jurists are competent to decide matters of historical fact is grotesque in itself. The following is an example:
In the book Hat Karl der Grosse Je Gelebt? [Was There Ever Really a Charlemagne?] (9), the Munich scholar Herbert Illig disputes the existence of Charlemagne, and declares the whole period from 614 to 911 A.D. to be a product of fantasy. This entire period of 297 years, together with Charlemagne and all the other historical figures of the same period, are alleged to have been invented by subsequent falsifiers of history for political reasons. The absence of any structures built during the three so-called “centuries of the Dark Ages” is the logical result of the non-existence of this period of history: an analysis of architectural monuments is said to show that the few structures alleged to have been built during this period, were, in reality, built later.
Due to an insufficient familiarity with the history of the early Middle Ages on our part, we shall refrain from expressing an opinion as to the value of Illig’s book. If his arguments should prove to be sheer fantasy, they will be ignored. If they should prove correct, the author will be sooner or later have to be recognized as a genius. There is another, third possibility, i.e., that Charlemagne actually lived, but never performed many of the heroic deeds attributed to him. In this case, Illig’s work would still have a seminal influence upon the writing of history by pointing out its shortcomings — particularly, an overly blind trust in the reliability of the sources employed.
One thing is for certain: Illig will never be hauled into court because of his book. No judge will ever jail him for “Denying the Genocide of the Pagans”, although, by disputing Charlemagne’s existence, he is, in effect, denying the mass murder of Saxon pagans attributed to him.
In short, Charlemagne, or any other historical subject for that matter, may be researched with complete freedom and the broadest possible latitude. The same statement is true of every other period of history — except the Second World War, and, in particular, the fate of the jews under the Third Reich. This fact alone ought to make every thinking person deeply suspicious: “truths” that require protection by criminal law usually turn out to be lies.
The bankruptcy of the official version of history
“Historians have only interpreted the Holocaust. The thing is to research it.”
Ulrich Herbert, German historian, in the Frankfurter Rundschau of 13 February 1997, p. 7.
The Lausanne daily Nouveau Quotidien on 2 and 3 September 1996, published two articles by the historian Jacques Baynac (an anti-revisionist). The first bore the promising title “How the Historians Turned the Job of Silencing the Revisionists Over to the Courts”. That means: the governmental persecution of revisionists described above is the logical consequence of the inability of orthodox historians to come up with any counter-argument with which to answer the revisionists. While revisionists RESEARCH the Holocaust, historians are simply content to INTERPRET it. The facts are irrelevant.
An excellent example of this may be seen in Gunnar Heinsohn’s book Warum Auschwitz? [Why Auschwitz?] (10). At the very beginning of the book, Heinsohn mentions an alleged Himmler order issued on 25 November 1944 on the disassembly of the gas chambers at Auschwitz. This Himmler order has haunted Holocaust literature for decades. No source for it is ever given, since no such order has ever been found. We don’t know which historian invented this lie, since the Holocaust scribblers simply copy all their nonsense back and forth.
With mock seriousness, Heinsohn lists “Two Hundred Forty Recognized Theories on Auschwitz”, and comments upon them at the end of the book (“Theory no. 20: Auschwitz as the Punishment of the jews for Worshipping Female Deities”
Theory no. 33: “Auschwitz as Preparation for the Restoration of Israel So That All Surviving jews May Gather Together and Fulfil the Conditions for the Coming of the End Days Through the Christian God”, etc., etc). He finally comes to the conclusion that Hitler wished to exterminate the jews because he hoped that, “with the disappearance of the jews of flesh and blood, the law of the sanctity of life, as well as the Commandments of love and righteousness, would be lost. He wished to create the right to kill, in order to create strategic advantages for the Germans in the conquering of living space” (cover blurb).
In the Middle Ages, scholars engaged in complex disputes as to how many angels could dance on the head of a pin. The existence of angels was never cast in doubt, and never proven; it was simply assumed as an axiom. Holocaust writers act in the same way. The existence of an “assembly line mass extermination” is assumed as an axiom, without any regard to the need for proof. They then proceed to speculate in a vacuum, far removed from historical realities, on the psychological and sociological factors which led to the assembly-line killing of jews in the third Reich”, etc., etc., just as medieval scholars speculated upon the sex of the number of angels dancing on the pinhead.
Revisionists ask very different questions, such as: What do the documents show about Auschwitz? How reliable are the eyewitnesses? What was the capacity of the crematoria? How quickly does Zyklon B evaporate, and at which temperatures? Did the “gas chambers” possess an efficient ventilation system? How did the Zyklon B enter the “gas chambers”? Are there any traces of cyanides in the mortar samples from the “gas chambers”?
In other words, on the one hand, are reason and logic; on the other, stands primitive superstition. There is no possible compromise between the two opposing parties. That is why the historians, to borrow a phrase from Baynac, have turned the job of silencing the revisionists over to the courts.
Notes:
1) Paul Rassinier, Le Drame des juifs europeens, Les Sept Couleurs, 1964, reprinted by La Vieille Taupe, Paris, p. 79.
2) Weltwoche series, “Auschwitz und die ‘Auschwitz-Luege'”, 9, 16, and 23 December 1993, 3 articles.
3) So far (early 1997) Switzerland, Belgium, and Spain have passed anti-revisionist muzzle laws in addition to France, Germany, and Austria. In Belgium and Spain, however, there appears to be little danger of their being used — for the moment.
4) The “Loi Gayssot”, see Eric Delcroix, La Police de la Pensee contre le Revisionnisme, RHR, Colombes Cedex/F. 1994.
5) See, in this regard, Gunther Anntohn/Henri Roques, Der Fall Guenter Deckert, DADC, Germania Verlag, Weinheim 1995.
6) See, in this regard no. Herbert Verbeke (publisher) Kardinalfragen zur Zeitgeschichte, Vrij Historisch Onderzoek, Berchem 1996.
7) Compare, in this regard, issue no. 69 of Historischen Tatsachen.
8) Prosecutor Jackson’s speech before the Tribunal, 26 July 1946.
9) Heribert Illig, Hat Karl der Grosse je gelebt? Mantis Verlag, Graefeling, 1995.
10) Gunnar Heinsohn, Warum Auschwitz? Rowohl, Hamburg, 1995.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-11-25--This is How They Get the Numbers to Scare the Normal Population About a Fake Virus

Numbers of COVID cases are exploding ?
What does that even mean ?
It certainly does not mean that people @ @ @ @ @ of COVID .

Oklahoma Army and Air National Guardsmen, under direction of Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt and alongside healthcare workers from the Oklahoma State Department of Health, help conduct COVID-19 testing at the Texas County Activity Center in Guymon, Oklahoma, May 16, 2020. As of May 19, 2020, Guymon had 650 confirmed cases of COVID-19, making it second in the total number of cases in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City, which has the highest number of COVID-19 cases, has the largest population of any city in Oklahoma, Guymon is 40th. The testing site was the first in the hotspot city to be open to all residents and not just those with doctor referrals. (Oklahoma Air National Guard photo by Tech. Sgt. Kasey M. Phipps)


renegadetribune--2020-11-25--Plant-Based Peanut Butter Pie

Plant-Based Peanut Butter Pie

Here is a recipe for our plant based peanut butter pie .
It is high in protein and easy to make .
Preheat the oven to 350F .
First assemble the crust .
In a food processor or blender add : Process ingredients until they begin to clump together .
Line a pie plate with parchment paper and press the crust dough into the pie dish and up around the sides .
Put in the oven for 12 minutes and remove to cool .
Next we will make the peanut butter filling .
Add the following ingredients to the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oz silken tofu ( we use shelf stable silken tofu .
If using silken tofu that is kept refrigerated in water , drain excess water first ) • 1/3 cup of salted peanut butter ( if using unsalted peanut butter , add 1/4 teaspoon of salt to the peanut butter ) Process the ingredients until they are fully incorporated and form a pudding like texture .
Once the pie crust has cooled add the peanut butter pie filling .
Last we will make the chocolate layer .
Add the following ingredients into a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to melt down the chocolate .
A bain-marie is when you put a small amount of water into a saucepan and put a heat safe bowl on top of the hot water .
Make sure that the heat safe bowl is not touching the water in the saucepan Heat the ingredients and mix until the chocolate is melted and the milk has been mixed into the chocolate evenly .
Pour this chocolate mixture on top of the peanut butter pie and allow to cool at room temperature until the chocolate hardens before putting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the chocolate has a shinier look .
Next add chopped raw or roasted peanuts and scatter evenly on top of the pie .
And now you have a super delicious , high protein plant based peanut butter pie !

Here is a recipe for our plant based peanut butter pie. It is high in protein and easy to make.
Preheat the oven to 350F. First assemble the crust. In a food processor or blender add:
1 cup of pitted medjool dates,
1/2 cup of steel cut (or rolled) oats
1/2 cup of pecans (walnuts work too)
Process ingredients until they begin to clump together. Line a pie plate with parchment paper and press the crust dough into the pie dish and up around the sides. Put in the oven for 12 minutes and remove to cool.
Next we will make the peanut butter filling.
Add the following ingredients to the same food processor or blender:
12.3 oz silken tofu (we use shelf stable silken tofu. If using silken tofu that is kept refrigerated in water, drain excess water first)
3 heaping tablespoons of peanut flour (peanut butter powder)
1/3 cup of salted peanut butter (if using unsalted peanut butter, add 1/4 teaspoon of salt to the peanut butter)
1 cup powdered sugar
1 tablespoon of agave or maple syrup
Process the ingredients until they are fully incorporated and form a pudding like texture. Once the pie crust has cooled add the peanut butter pie filling.
Last we will make the chocolate layer. Add the following ingredients into a heat safe bowl.
3/4 cup dairy free chocolate chips
3 tablespoons of plant milk of choice
Use a bain-marie to melt down the chocolate. A bain-marie is when you put a small amount of water into a saucepan and put a heat safe bowl on top of the hot water. Make sure that the heat safe bowl is not touching the water in the saucepan Heat the ingredients and mix until the chocolate is melted and the milk has been mixed into the chocolate evenly. Pour this chocolate mixture on top of the peanut butter pie and allow to cool at room temperature until the chocolate hardens before putting it in the fridge. This ensures that the chocolate has a shinier look. Next add chopped raw or roasted peanuts and scatter evenly on top of the pie.
And now you have a super delicious, high protein plant based peanut butter pie!
Share now!
Author: Sinead is a musician, writer, and thinker. Sinead is a musician, writer, and thinker.


renegadetribune--2020-11-25--UK Government Proposes “Freedom Passes” To Get ‘Safe’ People Back To Work

The rollout of COVID-19 immunity certificates across the UK could become a reality in 2021 .
A draft of the scheme , one where people who have contracted the virus and have recovered , or have naturally develop antibodies to fight the virus , could be given the golden ticket to resume a normal life .
UK ’ s Downing Street plans covid passes for anyone who gets two COVID-19 negative tests per week or has immunity to the virus or has yet to contract the virus .
The Telegraph notes Whitehall officials are planning to call the scheme “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ move to jump-start the ailing economy next year by allowing healthy people to conduct daily activities without being impeded by strict social-distancing measures .
A digital certificate , stored on a smartphone device , would be given to someone who meets the requirements for the new pass .
Conservative Tom Tugendhat recently said he could “ certainly see the day ” when proof of vaccination was required to return to normal life .
Plans for covid passes in the UK have been in the pipeline for months .
In April , health minister @ @ @ @ @ @ @ press conference that an “ an immunity certificate is an important thing that we will be doing and are looking at , but it ’ s too early in the science of the immunity that comes from having had the disease.
” We noted a couple of times ( see : here & here ) , covid passes are coming to the Western world and will act as a “ digital health passport ” that will contain your COVID-19 test history and other “ relevant health information.
” Billionaire Bill Gates has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the COVID-19 lockdown .
At this point , there ’ s nothing stopping the rollout of covid passes as these programs may start in the UK and other European countries before coming to the US .
Besides covid passes , Chinese President Xi Jinping told the G20 Summit on Saturday that globally-recognized health QR codes could be a way to restore international trade and travel .
What becomes clear is that global elites want to track everything in the world… This article originally appeared on Zero Hedge .

By Tyler Durden
The rollout of COVID-19 immunity certificates across the UK could become a reality in 2021. A draft of the scheme, one where people who have contracted the virus and have recovered, or have naturally develop antibodies to fight the virus, could be given the golden ticket to resume a normal life.
UK’s Downing Street plans covid passes for anyone who gets two COVID-19 negative tests per week or has immunity to the virus or has yet to contract the virus. The Telegraph notes Whitehall officials are planning to call the scheme “freedom passes.”
The strategy is a move to jump-start the ailing economy next year by allowing healthy people to conduct daily activities without being impeded by strict social-distancing measures.
A digital certificate, stored on a smartphone device, would be given to someone who meets the requirements for the new pass.
A source told the Telegraph:
“They will allow someone to wander down the streets, and if someone else asks why they are not wearing a mask, they can show the card, letter or an App.”
Conservative Tom Tugendhat recently said he could “certainly see the day” when proof of vaccination was required to return to normal life.
“If vaccination works and if we’re confident it’s safe, and all indications so far are good, then I can certainly see the day when businesses say: Look, you’ve got to return to the office and if you’re not vaccinated, you’re not coming in,” Tugendhat said.
Plans for covid passes in the UK have been in the pipeline for months.
In April, health minister Matt Hancock said at a Downing Street press conference that an “an immunity certificate is an important thing that we will be doing and are looking at, but it’s too early in the science of the immunity that comes from having had the disease.”
UK Health Secretary: "We are looking at an immunity certificate. How people who have had the disease, have got the antibodies, and therefore have immunity, can show that, and so get back… as much as possible to normal life." pic.twitter.com/SVLV8U2YwG — The Hill (@thehill) April 3, 2020
We noted a couple of times (see: here & here), covid passes are coming to the Western world and will act as a “digital health passport” that will contain your COVID-19 test history and other “relevant health information.”
Billionaire Bill Gates has been promoting the passes since the start of the COVID-19 lockdown.
At this point, there’s nothing stopping the rollout of covid passes as these programs may start in the UK and other European countries before coming to the US.
Besides covid passes, Chinese President Xi Jinping told the G20 Summit on Saturday that globally-recognized health QR codes could be a way to restore international trade and travel.
What becomes clear is that global elites want to track everything in the world…
This article originally appeared on Zero Hedge.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-25--Jerusalem Post Admits jews Are Behind Coronavirus Vaccines

Of course the Jerusalem Post is trying to make it seem like a good thing that a bunch of jewish supremacists are behind the development of vaccines that will put neurotoxins into people and change their genetic structure .
I guess we should be saying , Thanks jews !
Greer Fay Cashman starts out the article by explaining how jews are almost always at the top of any field , even though they are such a small part of the world population .
The individual does not necessarily represent the pack , but when the individual achieves fame or notoriety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for good and for bad by friend and foe with the country or faith into which he or she was born .
This is particularly so in the case of Jews , who , after all is said and done , represent a minuscule percentage of the world ’ s population .
Nonetheless , it is amazing how many accomplished individuals there have been , in any number of fields , whose biographical details , as published by Wikipedia , include mention of the fact that he or she was born into a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ references to someone being born Muslim , Hindu , Buddhist , Episcopalian , Catholic , Protestant , Anglican , Mormon , etc.
, although given their political clout , there is increasing mention of Evangelicals .
Of course when we are dealing with the field of “ medicine ” ( poison ) we are bound to find an extremely high number of jews .
The article goes on to mention only Albert Bourla , who heads Pfizer , and Dr. Tal Zaks , who is Moderna ’ s chief medical officer , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anti-semites , ” but there are many more jews Cashman could have mentioned .
For example , Michael Dolsten is the chief scientist at Pfizer , who is leading the company ’ s vaccine charge .
He said , “ There has been a strong Jewish tradition around contributing to humanity and a strong tradition within medicine.
” He also said that he hope hopes the US stays a “ melting pot , ” which itself was a genocidal concept cooked up by jew Israel Zangwill .
Pfizer and Moderna received $ 1.95 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Operation Warp Speed , and soon they will be seeking emergency use approval from the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) after they cooked their books about the safety and efficacy of their vaccines .
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar , whose maternal grandmother was a jew ( which would make his mother and himself a jew as well ) , has said that a vaccine will go first to “ wherever it ’ s going to add the most value according to the data and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Just trust the experts , goyim !
If you value the health and safety of yourself and your loved ones , you will stay as far away from this jewish vaccine as possible !

One can’t escape their presence in the forefront of leading companies in the race to find a vaccine that will prevent coronavirus.” – Jerusalem Post
Of course the Jerusalem Post is trying to make it seem like a good thing that a bunch of jewish supremacists are behind the development of vaccines that will put neurotoxins into people and change their genetic structure. I guess we should be saying, Thanks jews!
Greer Fay Cashman starts out the article by explaining how jews are almost always at the top of any field, even though they are such a small part of the world population.
The individual does not necessarily represent the pack, but when the individual achieves fame or notoriety, he or she is immediately associated for good and for bad by friend and foe with the country or faith into which he or she was born. This is particularly so in the case of Jews, who, after all is said and done, represent a minuscule percentage of the world’s population. Nonetheless, it is amazing how many accomplished individuals there have been, in any number of fields, whose biographical details, as published by Wikipedia, include mention of the fact that he or she was born into a Jewish family. There are far fewer references to someone being born Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Episcopalian, Catholic, Protestant, Anglican, Mormon, etc., although given their political clout, there is increasing mention of Evangelicals.
Of course when we are dealing with the field of “medicine” (poison) we are bound to find an extremely high number of jews.
Getting back to singling out Jews, one can’t escape their presence in the forefront of leading companies in the race to find a vaccine that will prevent coronavirus.
The article goes on to mention only Albert Bourla, who heads Pfizer, and Dr. Tal Zaks, who is Moderna’s chief medical officer, and how they have been attacked by “anti-semites,” but there are many more jews Cashman could have mentioned.
For example, Michael Dolsten is the chief scientist at Pfizer, who is leading the company’s vaccine charge. He said, “There has been a strong Jewish tradition around contributing to humanity and a strong tradition within medicine.” He also said that he hope hopes the US stays a “melting pot,” which itself was a genocidal concept cooked up by jew Israel Zangwill.
Pfizer and Moderna received $1.95 and $2.5 billion respectively through Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, and soon they will be seeking emergency use approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after they cooked their books about the safety and efficacy of their vaccines.
U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, whose maternal grandmother was a jew (which would make his mother and himself a jew as well), has said that a vaccine will go first to “wherever it’s going to add the most value according to the data and the science and the recommendations of our experts.” Just trust the experts, goyim!
If you value the health and safety of yourself and your loved ones, you will stay as far away from this jewish vaccine as possible!
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA