renegadetribune--2020-09-09--Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp? A Review

At the end of November or beginning December 1995 , during an evening stroll in the cold late fall of Moscow , Carlo Mattogno and I had an inspiration .
We had been working in two Russian archives with holdings in German wartime documents .
While our main research target was the Auschwitz concentration camp , we had also turned up quite a bit of material about Treblinka in the Archive of the Russian Federation , including many eyewitness testimonies and reports of Soviet commissions .
Despite the absence of primary documents German , we decided to write a book @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this notorious “ pure extermination camp ” had already appeared .
Udo Walendy had prepared a comprehensive critique of the official account of Treblinka in Historische Tatsachen ( Historical Facts ) No .
44 , pointing out a series of technical impossibilities as well as contradictions among the eyewitnesses .
The anthology Dissecting the Holocaust , which was published in 1994 by Ernst Gauss ( i.e .
Germar Rudolf ) , contained three essays – by John Ball , Friedrich P. Berg , and Arnulf Neumaier – which dealt completely or partially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , however , limited themselves to taking apart the orthodox version of the “ death factory , ” making no attempts to discover an alternative function for Treblinka .
This is in no way surprising : While a large number of documents survived in Auschwitz and Majdanek , those for Treblinka ( as well as for the other “ pure extermination camps ” Belzec , Sobibor , and Chelmno ) are as good as gone ; nor will the visitor find any tangible physical traces at the sites of the former camps .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ centers ” is therefore based solely on eyewitness testimonies .
It is not an easy matter to find out the real function of these camps under these circumstances .
It was chiefly for this reason that Mattogno and I put our Treblinka project temporarily on ice .
During the course of intensive travel in Poland in the summer of 1997 , we were able to visit the Treblinka site , 80 kilometers east of Warsaw , and take a number of photos , but our main interest was the concentration camp Majdanek .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Camp .
© Carlo Mattogno , 1997 Our interest in Treblinka was renewed by the end of 1999 , when our Australian friend Fredrick Töben informed us of the ground-penetrating radar investigations by his fellow Australian Richard Krege , a young engineer .
By means of radar , which discovers irregularities of the soil structure and can indicate underground finds as buried objects and grave sites , Krege investigated the area of Treblinka , which , according to eyewitnesses , contained huge mass graves .
Since neither Treblinka , nor Belzec @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have had crematoria , the corpses of 750,000 to three million murdered jews ( the numbers depending on the author ) were first buried in mass graves , but then , following the spring of 1943 , dug up and cremated in open air on huge gratings , allegedly without leaving a trace .
Based on preliminary results from several days worth of radar investigations in October 1999 , Krege came to the conclusion that the soil in the zone of the alleged mass graves was completely untouched and that therefore the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exciting news .
If Krege ’ s results were correct , then the extermination camp story was , with absolute scientific certainty , finished , for the official version of Treblinka stands and falls with the existence of those graves .
I quickly contacted the Australian engineer by telephone in order to learn the details .
He informed me that his data were incomplete : Further on-site investigations were necessary .
He also planned to check out Belzec and Sobibor .
We decided to work together .
Since the two-week rental of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ means , I sent out a letter requesting donations from my sponsors and friends , and succeeded in raising the necessary amount .
On August 21 , 2000 , six days after my 49th birthday ( at which time I departed my homeland , Switzerland , permanently ) , the three of us – Richard Krege , Carlo Mattogno , and I – met in Cracow .
However , Mattogno had to return to Italy two days later due to a family illness – which fortunately proved not to be serious – so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ extermination camps ” on our own .
Our first goal was Auschwitz .
For his study , Krege required a comparison between Treblinka and a place where mass graves had been dug at the time of the Second World War .
Several such graves are located in Auschwitz-Birkenau , where about 20,000 victims perished during a murderous spotted fever epidemic during the summer and fall of 1942 .
Since the capacity of the old crematorium in the main camp was insufficient by far for the cremation of all the epidemic victims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet been built , the corpses were for the most part buried in mass graves , which are clearly visible on the Allied aerial photographs as published and interpreted by John Ball .
We had no problems finding one of the graves with the ground-penetrating radar device ; the ground configuration and vegetation unmistakably differed from that of adjacent areas .
Krege worked there for two days with his equipment .
Because I had no idea how to operate the apparatus , I was unable to be of much help , so my @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of interpreter .
The next station was Belzec , where my colleague found ideal working conditions .
Although about 600,000 jews are alleged to have been gassed in this tiny camp , i.e .
one tenth of the famous “ six million , ” it attracts few visitors , and the Polish authorities have not thought it necessary to build a museum there .
Therefore Krege could work there for days undisturbed , especially since Mother Nature was smiling on us .
Conditions were different in Sobibor : First , there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ camp , the employees of which are quick to notice any unauthorized activity in the camp area , and second , as a young Polish historian who worked in the museum informed us , the exact ( or supposed ) location of the mass graves is unknown .
Since the historian knew Mattogno and myself to be revisionists from our previous visit in 1997 , we renounced any secrecy and asked for permission to employ the radar equipment .
The man referred us to an office in Warsaw to obtain the necessary approval @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and continued on to Treblinka .
There we stayed in a well-kept country guest house at the edge of the small town Ostrow , not far from Treblinka .
Over the following days Krege worked tirelessly with his radar equipment , checking out every square meter of ground in the area of the alleged mass graves .
Since buses with ( frequently Israeli ) Holocaust tourists arrived continuously , I was on tenterhooks throughout .
Luckily the industrious activity of my companion caused no suspicion among the Holocaust pilgrims , and we left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ returned to his home via Germany the following day , while my path led me further east – first to Lemberg ( Lviv ) , in Ukraine , where I researched for several days in the local archive , then to on Moscow , and two months later to the Orient .
But that is another story .
Richard Krege presented the initial results of his research , displayed on slides , at two conferences ( in June 2001 in Washington and in January 2002 in Moscow ) .
While the scans of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , strengthening support for the presence of an earlier mass grave , all traces of similar soil disturbances are missing in Treblinka and Belzec .
The only logical conclusion is that these huge mass graves , containing up to one and a half million corpses ( per Encyclopedia of the Holocaust : 870,000 in Treblinka and 600,000 in Belzec ) , never existed .
This fact alone suffices to make the official version of the Holocaust collapse like a house of cards .
Originally Mattogno , Krege , and I planned to publish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ penetration studies of Treblinka as part of a comprehensive study of the camp .
Our plan has changed .
In view of the special importance of these research results we have agreed to the suggestion of Castle Hill Publishers that we publish them , together with those from Belzec , in a separate book .
Therefore Krege ’ s results were not included in the Treblinka book , which Mattogno and I completed in the spring of 2002 .
Treblinka .
Cross beams of concrete , along a concrete platform , symbolize the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ camp .
© Carlo Mattogno , 1997 .
Treblinka : Extermination Camp or Transfer Camp ?
is mostly the work of Carlo Mattogno , since he edited seven of the nine chapters .
I am the author of the first and fifth chapter , and the introduction and conclusion ; I also translated Mattogno ’ s chapters into German .
The first part of the book includes an overview of orthodox as well as revisionist historiography on Treblinka , a thorough analysis of the origin of the official version of Treblinka , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ version that goes far beyond previous revisionist scholarship , and a survey of the Treblinka trials in Germany and Israel , in which nearly every principle of justice was discarded .
The second part of our book establishes that Treblinka was a transit camp , through which the deported jews from Warsaw and other Polish towns were channeled , partly eastward into the occupied Soviet territories , partly southward to Majdanek and other work camps in the Lublin district .
According to the official historiography , the jews who arrived in Treblinka were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ camp , where they had to shower and their clothes had to be disinfested before they continued their journey .
In this way , goes the story , the jews were enticed to enter the gas chambers .
We assume that the first part of the story is correct : The jews took showers , and their belongings were placed in disinfestation chambers .
As is known , German disinfestation chambers during the war were often operated with steam .
If this was the case in Treblinka , it is the key to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to which the jews were allegedly killed in Treblinka with steam .
On November 15 , 1942 , less than four months after the opening of the camp , the resistance organization of the Warsaw ghetto published a long report entitled Treblinka : Eternal Disgrace for the German Nation , in which it was claimed that to that date two million jews ( almost 20,000 per day ! )
had been murdered in steam chambers .
The report went on to allege that the corpses had been buried in ever larger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extermination of all jews “ the ghost of death in the steam chambers would stand before the eyes of the whole Polish people.
” Treblinka : Eternal Disgrace was taken quite seriously in the Warsaw ghetto .
The journalist Eugenia Szaijn-Lewin entered the following in her diary : “ The worst is the death in Treblinka .
In the meantime we all have become aware of Treblinka .
Over there , people are boiled alive.
” After the Red Army conquered the region around Treblinka in August 1944 , Soviet investigative commissions set @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million people were killed in the camp .
However , the specified killing method was no longer steam , but rather suffocation achieved by sucking the air from the death chambers by means of a vacuum pump driven by a diesel engine .
Gradually the diesel engine , which had at first only driven the pump , was transformed into the killing weapon itself .
The author of the latest counterfeit of Treblinka reality was the jewish carpenter Yankiel Wiernik , who , in May 1944 , plagiarized the report of the resistance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ steam chambers ” with “ gas chambers ” .
It is quite probable that there was a diesel engine in Treblinka : A generator set would have been needed to supply the necessary electricity , and such a set was normally driven by a diesel engine .
Since diesel engine exhaust fumes smell terribly , the technical amateur Wiernik evidently believed that these exhaust fumes were a suitable means of murder .
This is a gross error , for , as Friedrich P. Berg and other revisionists have emphasized , these emissions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oxygen and low content of carbon monoxide , are poorly suited for the killing of people ; any gasoline engine would be more efficient .
Between August 1944 and the end of 1945 , differing methods of extermination contended in the atrocity propaganda .
The three most often mentioned were suffocation by vacuum pumping of the death chambers , diesel exhaust fumes , and steam .
The Soviet-jewish author Wassili Grossmann wrote in his horror report The Hell of Treblinka , which was published in several languages in 1945 ( and according to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ land of Treblinka consumed more people than all the seas and oceans together since the beginning of mankind “ ) , that all three techniques were used , but mostly the first one .
Although a document submitted by the Polish authorities to the Nuremberg Tribunal in December 1945 stated that several hundred thousand jews were killed in Treblinka with steam ( PS-3311 ) , the Polish judge Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz , the author of the first forensic reports about Treblinka , decided at about the same time for diesel exhaust fumes , because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most believable of the various killing techniques offered by the witnesses .
In February 1946 the former Treblinka inmate Samuel Rajzman , in testimony presented at Nuremberg , spoke only of gas chambers .
Since the Gerstein report , which at that time was attracting the attention of the historians , also mentioned diesel engines as the killing weapons at Belzec and Treblinka , the diesel gas chamber became at that time “ established historic fact , ” and the other variants disappeared into the trash bin of history .
The original figure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , was dropped as too unbelievable ; in the following years considerably lower numbers were found satisfactory .
In toto , the various witnesses listed the following killing methods for Treblinka : • None Exhaust fumes from an unspecified engine , with poison added to the fuel .
• None A mobile gas chamber that traveled along the mass graves and unloaded the corpses into them .
• None Gas chambers with delayed reaction gas , which enabled the victims to walk to the mass graves , where they lost consciousness and fell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in trains ; according to this version Treblinka served only as a burial place .
• None Suffocation by vacuum pumping of the chambers .
This total confusion is of course quite embarrassing for the historians .
While the less venturesome , such as Raul Hilberg , were satisfied to ignore all killing techniques described by the witnesses except the diesel engine , more impudent writers stoop to falsifying historical sources .
This is especially true of the Israeli professor Yitzhak Arad , author of the “ standard work ” Belzec , Sobibor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Camps , in which the descriptions of the resistance movement of November 1942 are reproduced in detail , but the original “ steam chambers ” are replaced with “ gas chambers ” each time !
In short : The official Treblinka version is an uninterrupted chain of absurdities .
This , however , does not answer the question of the camp ’ s actual purpose .
Such revisionists as Arthur Butz , Robert Faurisson , Mark Weber , and Andrew Allen hypothesized that Treblinka was a transfer camp many years ago .
Mattogno @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of numerous documents , the National Socialist policy of jewish resettlement to the East in two chapters , and in the final chapter provides evidence upon evidence and proof upon proof that those jews who were brought to Treblinka were indeed subsequently sent through to other destinations .
In order to counter the objection that , in the end , it does not matter whether the jews were gassed in Poland or shot farther east , Mattogno in another chapter scrutinizes the thesis of the orthodox historians , according to which the Einsatzgruppen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jews in the occupied eastern territories , and demonstrates that this allegation is untenable .
That Treblinka served , among other things , as a transit camp to Majdanek and other work camps in the Lublin area is admitted even by the jewish historians Tatiana Berenstein and Adam Rutkowski .
In the verdict of the Demjanjuk trial in Jerusalem certain former jewish deportees were named who arrived in Majdanek after a short stay in Treblinka .
It is more difficult to prove that jews were deported from Treblinka to the occupied Soviet areas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proof exists .
On July 31 , 1942 , one week after the opening of Treblinka , the Reichskommissar for White Russia , Wilhelm Kube , excitedly objected to Reichskomissar for the Eastern territories Heinrich Lohse against the transportation of 1,000 jews from Warsaw to Minsk , on the grounds that these jews represented a danger as potential carriers of epidemics and as supporters of the partisans .
At that time all deported jews from Warsaw arrived in Treblinka , so that those 1,000 jews must have been sent through that camp to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough to shake the foundations of the story of the “ pure extermination camp , ” in which every jew except for a handful of “ work jews ” was immediately murdered .
Whoever objects that this transport is merely an exception must ask himself how many other such “ exceptions ” existed .
Of course much is still obscure : the exact number of jews deported to Treblinka , the exact destinations of those who were transferred from there , the fate of those who survived the harsh conditions of the war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the improving accessibility to the archives in the new nations that have sprung from the former USSR will make it possible for historians who are interested in the truth to shed more and more light into this darkness .
Our book contains numerous photos and documents and is based on the analysis of the German , Polish , French , and English published literature on Treblinka and on intensive research in many archives .
Carlo Mattogno has based the technical part partially on prewar sources ; he cites , for example , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ published in Germany in 1930 , which indicates that the Germans already at that time had exact knowledge of the relatively low danger of diesel exhaust fumes , which underlines the falsity of the tale of the diesel exhaust fumes gas chambers .
Richard Krege ’ s book about the results of his ground penetrating radar investigations will be a welcome addition to our research results when it appears .
We rather doubt whether the representatives of the orthodox historiography will be able to counter with much more than lawsuits and testimonies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who described in Claude Lanzmann ’ s film Shoah how he cut off the hair of seventy naked women in a gas chamber four meters long by four meters wide .

Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?
A Review
By Jürgen Graf
Published: 2004-02-01
Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp?, Theses & Dissertations Press, Chicago 2004, pb, 370 pp., $25.-
At the end of November or beginning December 1995, during an evening stroll in the cold late fall of Moscow, Carlo Mattogno and I had an inspiration. We had been working in two Russian archives with holdings in German wartime documents. While our main research target was the Auschwitz concentration camp, we had also turned up quite a bit of material about Treblinka in the Archive of the Russian Federation, including many eyewitness testimonies and reports of Soviet commissions. Despite the absence of primary documents German, we decided to write a book about Treblinka.
Several important revisionist investigations of this notorious “pure extermination camp” had already appeared. Udo Walendy had prepared a comprehensive critique of the official account of Treblinka in Historische Tatsachen (Historical Facts) No. 44, pointing out a series of technical impossibilities as well as contradictions among the eyewitnesses. The anthology Dissecting the Holocaust, which was published in 1994 by Ernst Gauss (i.e. Germar Rudolf), contained three essays – by John Ball, Friedrich P. Berg, and Arnulf Neumaier – which dealt completely or partially with Treblinka. All of these authors, however, limited themselves to taking apart the orthodox version of the “death factory,” making no attempts to discover an alternative function for Treblinka.
This is in no way surprising: While a large number of documents survived in Auschwitz and Majdanek, those for Treblinka (as well as for the other “pure extermination camps” Belzec, Sobibor, and Chelmno) are as good as gone; nor will the visitor find any tangible physical traces at the sites of the former camps. The modern picture of the “killing centers” is therefore based solely on eyewitness testimonies. It is not an easy matter to find out the real function of these camps under these circumstances.
It was chiefly for this reason that Mattogno and I put our Treblinka project temporarily on ice. During the course of intensive travel in Poland in the summer of 1997, we were able to visit the Treblinka site, 80 kilometers east of Warsaw, and take a number of photos, but our main interest was the concentration camp Majdanek.
Treblinka. Stone Memorial in the Center of the Camp. © Carlo Mattogno, 1997
Our interest in Treblinka was renewed by the end of 1999, when our Australian friend Fredrick Töben informed us of the ground-penetrating radar investigations by his fellow Australian Richard Krege, a young engineer. By means of radar, which discovers irregularities of the soil structure and can indicate underground finds as buried objects and grave sites, Krege investigated the area of Treblinka, which, according to eyewitnesses, contained huge mass graves. Since neither Treblinka, nor Belzec, Sobibor, or Chelmno are alleged to have had crematoria, the corpses of 750,000 to three million murdered jews (the numbers depending on the author) were first buried in mass graves, but then, following the spring of 1943, dug up and cremated in open air on huge gratings, allegedly without leaving a trace. Based on preliminary results from several days worth of radar investigations in October 1999, Krege came to the conclusion that the soil in the zone of the alleged mass graves was completely untouched and that therefore the graves had never existed.
This was exciting news. If Krege’s results were correct, then the extermination camp story was, with absolute scientific certainty, finished, for the official version of Treblinka stands and falls with the existence of those graves. I quickly contacted the Australian engineer by telephone in order to learn the details. He informed me that his data were incomplete: Further on-site investigations were necessary. He also planned to check out Belzec and Sobibor. We decided to work together.
Since the two-week rental of the radar equipment was beyond Krege’s means, I sent out a letter requesting donations from my sponsors and friends, and succeeded in raising the necessary amount. On August 21, 2000, six days after my 49th birthday (at which time I departed my homeland, Switzerland, permanently), the three of us – Richard Krege, Carlo Mattogno, and I – met in Cracow. However, Mattogno had to return to Italy two days later due to a family illness – which fortunately proved not to be serious – so Krege and I continued the journey to the “extermination camps” on our own.
Our first goal was Auschwitz. For his study, Krege required a comparison between Treblinka and a place where mass graves had been dug at the time of the Second World War. Several such graves are located in Auschwitz-Birkenau, where about 20,000 victims perished during a murderous spotted fever epidemic during the summer and fall of 1942. Since the capacity of the old crematorium in the main camp was insufficient by far for the cremation of all the epidemic victims and the crematoria of Birkenau had not yet been built, the corpses were for the most part buried in mass graves, which are clearly visible on the Allied aerial photographs as published and interpreted by John Ball. We had no problems finding one of the graves with the ground-penetrating radar device; the ground configuration and vegetation unmistakably differed from that of adjacent areas. Krege worked there for two days with his equipment. Because I had no idea how to operate the apparatus, I was unable to be of much help, so my task on that trip was limited to one of interpreter.
The next station was Belzec, where my colleague found ideal working conditions. Although about 600,000 jews are alleged to have been gassed in this tiny camp, i.e. one tenth of the famous “six million,” it attracts few visitors, and the Polish authorities have not thought it necessary to build a museum there. Therefore Krege could work there for days undisturbed, especially since Mother Nature was smiling on us. Conditions were different in Sobibor: First, there is a museum at the entrance to the camp, the employees of which are quick to notice any unauthorized activity in the camp area, and second, as a young Polish historian who worked in the museum informed us, the exact (or supposed) location of the mass graves is unknown. Since the historian knew Mattogno and myself to be revisionists from our previous visit in 1997, we renounced any secrecy and asked for permission to employ the radar equipment. The man referred us to an office in Warsaw to obtain the necessary approval; we declined so futile an effort and continued on to Treblinka.
There we stayed in a well-kept country guest house at the edge of the small town Ostrow, not far from Treblinka. Over the following days Krege worked tirelessly with his radar equipment, checking out every square meter of ground in the area of the alleged mass graves. Since buses with (frequently Israeli) Holocaust tourists arrived continuously, I was on tenterhooks throughout. Luckily the industrious activity of my companion caused no suspicion among the Holocaust pilgrims, and we left Treblinka without any awkward incidents. Krege returned to his home via Germany the following day, while my path led me further east – first to Lemberg (Lviv), in Ukraine, where I researched for several days in the local archive, then to on Moscow, and two months later to the Orient. But that is another story.
Richard Krege presented the initial results of his research, displayed on slides, at two conferences (in June 2001 in Washington and in January 2002 in Moscow). While the scans of Birkenau showed evidence of massive ground disturbances, strengthening support for the presence of an earlier mass grave, all traces of similar soil disturbances are missing in Treblinka and Belzec. The only logical conclusion is that these huge mass graves, containing up to one and a half million corpses (per Encyclopedia of the Holocaust: 870,000 in Treblinka and 600,000 in Belzec), never existed. This fact alone suffices to make the official version of the Holocaust collapse like a house of cards.
Originally Mattogno, Krege, and I planned to publish the complete results of these radar ground penetration studies of Treblinka as part of a comprehensive study of the camp. Our plan has changed. In view of the special importance of these research results we have agreed to the suggestion of Castle Hill Publishers that we publish them, together with those from Belzec, in a separate book. Therefore Krege’s results were not included in the Treblinka book, which Mattogno and I completed in the spring of 2002.
Treblinka. Cross beams of concrete, along a concrete platform, symbolize the rail-road track and the ramp of the camp. © Carlo Mattogno, 1997.
Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transfer Camp? is mostly the work of Carlo Mattogno, since he edited seven of the nine chapters. I am the author of the first and fifth chapter, and the introduction and conclusion; I also translated Mattogno’s chapters into German. The first part of the book includes an overview of orthodox as well as revisionist historiography on Treblinka, a thorough analysis of the origin of the official version of Treblinka, a systematic historic and technical rebuttal of this version that goes far beyond previous revisionist scholarship, and a survey of the Treblinka trials in Germany and Israel, in which nearly every principle of justice was discarded. The second part of our book establishes that Treblinka was a transit camp, through which the deported jews from Warsaw and other Polish towns were channeled, partly eastward into the occupied Soviet territories, partly southward to Majdanek and other work camps in the Lublin district.
According to the official historiography, the jews who arrived in Treblinka were told that they were in a transfer camp, where they had to shower and their clothes had to be disinfested before they continued their journey. In this way, goes the story, the jews were enticed to enter the gas chambers. We assume that the first part of the story is correct: The jews took showers, and their belongings were placed in disinfestation chambers. As is known, German disinfestation chambers during the war were often operated with steam. If this was the case in Treblinka, it is the key to the original version of the extermination myth, according to which the jews were allegedly killed in Treblinka with steam. On November 15, 1942, less than four months after the opening of the camp, the resistance organization of the Warsaw ghetto published a long report entitled Treblinka: Eternal Disgrace for the German Nation, in which it was claimed that to that date two million jews (almost 20,000 per day!) had been murdered in steam chambers. The report went on to allege that the corpses had been buried in ever larger mass graves, and that after the extermination of all jews “the ghost of death in the steam chambers would stand before the eyes of the whole Polish people.” Treblinka: Eternal Disgrace was taken quite seriously in the Warsaw ghetto. The journalist Eugenia Szaijn-Lewin entered the following in her diary:
“The worst is the death in Treblinka. In the meantime we all have become aware of Treblinka. Over there, people are boiled alive.”
After the Red Army conquered the region around Treblinka in August 1944, Soviet investigative commissions set immediately to work, reporting that three million people were killed in the camp. However, the specified killing method was no longer steam, but rather suffocation achieved by sucking the air from the death chambers by means of a vacuum pump driven by a diesel engine. Gradually the diesel engine, which had at first only driven the pump, was transformed into the killing weapon itself. The author of the latest counterfeit of Treblinka reality was the jewish carpenter Yankiel Wiernik, who, in May 1944, plagiarized the report of the resistance organization of November 1942, replacing the “steam chambers” with “gas chambers”.
It is quite probable that there was a diesel engine in Treblinka: A generator set would have been needed to supply the necessary electricity, and such a set was normally driven by a diesel engine. Since diesel engine exhaust fumes smell terribly, the technical amateur Wiernik evidently believed that these exhaust fumes were a suitable means of murder. This is a gross error, for, as Friedrich P. Berg and other revisionists have emphasized, these emissions, due to their high content of oxygen and low content of carbon monoxide, are poorly suited for the killing of people; any gasoline engine would be more efficient.
Between August 1944 and the end of 1945, differing methods of extermination contended in the atrocity propaganda. The three most often mentioned were suffocation by vacuum pumping of the death chambers, diesel exhaust fumes, and steam. The Soviet-jewish author Wassili Grossmann wrote in his horror report The Hell of Treblinka, which was published in several languages in 1945 (and according to which the “barbed wire surrounded waste land of Treblinka consumed more people than all the seas and oceans together since the beginning of mankind“), that all three techniques were used, but mostly the first one. Although a document submitted by the Polish authorities to the Nuremberg Tribunal in December 1945 stated that several hundred thousand jews were killed in Treblinka with steam (PS-3311), the Polish judge Zdzislaw Lukaszkiewicz, the author of the first forensic reports about Treblinka, decided at about the same time for diesel exhaust fumes, because this appeared to him to be the most believable of the various killing techniques offered by the witnesses. In February 1946 the former Treblinka inmate Samuel Rajzman, in testimony presented at Nuremberg, spoke only of gas chambers. Since the Gerstein report, which at that time was attracting the attention of the historians, also mentioned diesel engines as the killing weapons at Belzec and Treblinka, the diesel gas chamber became at that time “established historic fact,” and the other variants disappeared into the trash bin of history. The original figure for of Treblinka victims, three million, was dropped as too unbelievable; in the following years considerably lower numbers were found satisfactory.
In toto, the various witnesses listed the following killing methods for Treblinka:
Exhaust fumes from an unspecified engine, with poison added to the fuel.
A mobile gas chamber that traveled along the mass graves and unloaded the corpses into them.
Gas chambers with delayed reaction gas, which enabled the victims to walk to the mass graves, where they lost consciousness and fell into the graves.
Quicklime in trains; according to this version Treblinka served only as a burial place.
Boiling steam.
Electric current.
Shooting with machine guns.
Suffocation by vacuum pumping of the chambers.
Chlorine gas.
Zyklon B.
Diesel exhaust fumes.
This total confusion is of course quite embarrassing for the historians. While the less venturesome, such as Raul Hilberg, were satisfied to ignore all killing techniques described by the witnesses except the diesel engine, more impudent writers stoop to falsifying historical sources. This is especially true of the Israeli professor Yitzhak Arad, author of the “standard work” Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, The Operation Reinhard Death Camps, in which the descriptions of the resistance movement of November 1942 are reproduced in detail, but the original “steam chambers” are replaced with “gas chambers” each time!
In short: The official Treblinka version is an uninterrupted chain of absurdities. This, however, does not answer the question of the camp’s actual purpose. Such revisionists as Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, Mark Weber, and Andrew Allen hypothesized that Treblinka was a transfer camp many years ago. Mattogno meticulously sets forth, on the basis of numerous documents, the National Socialist policy of jewish resettlement to the East in two chapters, and in the final chapter provides evidence upon evidence and proof upon proof that those jews who were brought to Treblinka were indeed subsequently sent through to other destinations. In order to counter the objection that, in the end, it does not matter whether the jews were gassed in Poland or shot farther east, Mattogno in another chapter scrutinizes the thesis of the orthodox historians, according to which the Einsatzgruppen performed a policy of systematic extermination of Jews in the occupied eastern territories, and demonstrates that this allegation is untenable.
That Treblinka served, among other things, as a transit camp to Majdanek and other work camps in the Lublin area is admitted even by the jewish historians Tatiana Berenstein and Adam Rutkowski. In the verdict of the Demjanjuk trial in Jerusalem certain former jewish deportees were named who arrived in Majdanek after a short stay in Treblinka. It is more difficult to prove that jews were deported from Treblinka to the occupied Soviet areas, but at least one solidly documented proof exists. On July 31, 1942, one week after the opening of Treblinka, the Reichskommissar for White Russia, Wilhelm Kube, excitedly objected to Reichskomissar for the Eastern territories Heinrich Lohse against the transportation of 1,000 jews from Warsaw to Minsk, on the grounds that these jews represented a danger as potential carriers of epidemics and as supporters of the partisans. At that time all deported jews from Warsaw arrived in Treblinka, so that those 1,000 jews must have been sent through that camp to Minsk. This one transport already is enough to shake the foundations of the story of the “pure extermination camp,” in which every jew except for a handful of “work jews” was immediately murdered. Whoever objects that this transport is merely an exception must ask himself how many other such “exceptions” existed.
Of course much is still obscure: the exact number of jews deported to Treblinka, the exact destinations of those who were transferred from there, the fate of those who survived the harsh conditions of the war. There is reason to hope that the improving accessibility to the archives in the new nations that have sprung from the former USSR will make it possible for historians who are interested in the truth to shed more and more light into this darkness.
Our book contains numerous photos and documents and is based on the analysis of the German, Polish, French, and English published literature on Treblinka and on intensive research in many archives. Carlo Mattogno has based the technical part partially on prewar sources; he cites, for example, a technical-toxicological study prepared by leading experts and published in Germany in 1930, which indicates that the Germans already at that time had exact knowledge of the relatively low danger of diesel exhaust fumes, which underlines the falsity of the tale of the diesel exhaust fumes gas chambers. Richard Krege’s book about the results of his ground penetrating radar investigations will be a welcome addition to our research results when it appears. We rather doubt whether the representatives of the orthodox historiography will be able to counter with much more than lawsuits and testimonies, such as that of Abraham Bomba, who described in Claude Lanzmann’s film Shoah how he cut off the hair of seventy naked women in a gas chamber four meters long by four meters wide.
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-09-09--Joseph Haydn’s Cello Concertos

Joseph Haydn’s Cello Concertos

Joseph Haydn , in full Franz Joseph Haydn , ( born March 31 , 1732 , Rohrau , Austria—died May @ @ @ @ @ ) , Austrian composer who was one of the most important figures in the development @ @ @ @ @ music during the 18th century .
He helped establish the forms and styles for the @ @ @ @ @ .
( From Britannica )

Joseph Haydn, in full Franz Joseph Haydn, (born March 31, 1732, Rohrau, Austria—died May 31, 1809, Vienna), Austrian composer who was one of the most important figures in the development of the Classical style in music during the 18th century. He helped establish the forms and styles for the string quartet and the symphony. (From Britannica)
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-09-09--The ADL Explained In Under a Minute

The ADL Explained In Under a Minute

I had made this for a Tik Tok before triggered jews mass flagged my account , thus taking away my @ @ @ @ @ the kvetching over at my Yid Tok while it lasts .
https : //www.tiktok.com/ @ @ @ @

I had made this for a Tik Tok before triggered jews mass flagged my account, thus taking away my upload privileges.
Check out the kvetching over at my Yid Tok while it lasts. https://www.tiktok.com/@goyimgoddessv?lang=en
Bitcute link
Share now!
Author: Sinead is a musician, writer, and thinker. Sinead is a musician, writer, and thinker.


renegadetribune--2020-09-09--Studies Question Transmission of 1918 Spanish Flu

The 1918 Spanish flu is said to have been one of the most highly virulent , contagious diseases of all time , but when researchers attempted to spread it from person to person — by directly spraying “ infectious ” secretions into people ’ s noses , eyes and throats — no one got sick The 1918 flu pandemic , also known as the Spanish flu , is considered to be one of the most severe pandemics in history .
Said to have been caused by an H1N1 virus that originated in birds , it spread around the globe from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million people , or one-third of the world ’ s population at that time .
An estimated 50 million people were said to have died due to the 1918 flu pandemic , 675,000 of them in the U.S. [ i ] To this day , there remain many questions about this pandemic and the virus that is said to have caused it .
“ While the 1918 H1N1 virus has been synthesized and evaluated , the properties that made it so devastating are not well understood , ” the U.S. Centers for Disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
[ ii ] Although the 1918 H1N1 virus was said to be highly virulent and spread via human contact , what is even more curious is that laboratory experiments were never able to confirm this .
In fact , when researchers took every measure they could think of to infect people with the virus , they were unsuccessful , calling into question whether it was , in fact , spread from person to person .
Scientists Fail to Infect Other Humans With 1918 Spanish Flu Infecting humans with a flu virus for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ longer deemed ethical , but this wasn ’ t the case during the 1918 to 1919 pandemic , when Dr. Milton Rosenau , an infectious disease expert , conducted human experiments on U.S. Navy sailors in cooperation with the Public Health Service and the U.S .
Navy .
[ iii ] Volunteers from the U.S .
Naval Training Station in Deer Island , Boston , who “ appeared to be in excellent physical condition , ” took part in the study , [ iv ] which consisted of the scientists attempting to infect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To do this , they collected various secretions from people sick with the flu — nasal secretions , mucous from their throats and even direct coughing in the face — and exposed the volunteers .
The donors were said to be early in the disease , within the first , second or third day , to ensure they would still be contagious .
The infectious substances were then sprayed into the volunteers ’ nostrils , throat and eyes , and then the researchers waited 10 days for them to become ill — but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any way.
” [ v ] Writing in the journal Public Health Reports , John Eyler , Ph .
D. , of the University of Minnesota , explained : Other research has also failed to show human-to-human transmission of influenza , with one 2013 review conducted by U.S. CDC scientists and colleagues concluding , “ Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza.
” [ vii ] Edwin Jordan , a public health scientist who conducted some of the most well-known research into the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] also reported in 1927 that five studies failed to demonstrate sick-to-well transmission of influenza .
“ Jordan reports that all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission , in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients , in various stages of their illness , carefully cough , spit , and breathe on a combined total of > 150 well patients , ” according to a review published in Virology in 2008 .
[ ix ] Rosenau ’ s study was the largest among them .
Even after failing to infect people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Rosenau stated , “ We must be very careful not to draw any positive conclusions from the negative results of this kind.
” [ x ] At the same time , he acknowledged : Their report documented eight other studies that also failed to identify how the Spanish flu was spread , but said perhaps other factors were involved relating to how the virus was discharged from or entered the body .
Perhaps , some suggested , the volunteers were already immune .
But some of the volunteers were specifically included because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Others suggested that the virus donors may have no longer been infectious , but the patients were said to have been within their first three days of illness , when viral shedding should be at its peak .
[ xii ] “ It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions , ” Eyler wrote .
[ xiii ] Their study effectively showed that the 1918 Spanish flu was not a contagious disease , but they still theorized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aggressive in exposing the volunteers ( more aggressive than directly spraying “ infectious ” nasal secretions up someone ’ s nose ? )
, they would have gotten a different result .
It ’ s even been suggested that perhaps the donors didn ’ t actually have the flu at all , but it ’ s believed that physicians were highly capable of diagnosing influenza in 1918 , and all the donors were symptomatic , making this highly unlikely .
“ Obviously , another explanation is that sick-to-well transmission is not the usual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Journal review added .
[ xiv ] Indeed , the real disease here appears to be in researchers believing what they want to believe — in this case that the Spanish flu was easily transmitted from person to person — even if the science clearly says otherwise .
[ iv ] Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza , Boston , November and December 1918 , Page 7 https : //hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3750flu.0016.573

The 1918 Spanish flu is said to have been one of the most highly virulent, contagious diseases of all time, but when researchers attempted to spread it from person to person — by directly spraying “infectious” secretions into people’s noses, eyes and throats — no one got sick
The 1918 flu pandemic, also known as the Spanish flu, is considered to be one of the most severe pandemics in history. Said to have been caused by an H1N1 virus that originated in birds, it spread around the globe from 1918 to 1919, infecting about 500 million people, or one-third of the world’s population at that time. An estimated 50 million people were said to have died due to the 1918 flu pandemic, 675,000 of them in the U.S.[i]
To this day, there remain many questions about this pandemic and the virus that is said to have caused it. “While the 1918 H1N1 virus has been synthesized and evaluated, the properties that made it so devastating are not well understood,” the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admits.[ii]
Although the 1918 H1N1 virus was said to be highly virulent and spread via human contact, what is even more curious is that laboratory experiments were never able to confirm this. In fact, when researchers took every measure they could think of to infect people with the virus, they were unsuccessful, calling into question whether it was, in fact, spread from person to person.
Scientists Fail to Infect Other Humans With 1918 Spanish Flu
Infecting humans with a flu virus for the sake of medical research is no longer deemed ethical, but this wasn’t the case during the 1918 to 1919 pandemic, when Dr. Milton Rosenau, an infectious disease expert, conducted human experiments on U.S. Navy sailors in cooperation with the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy.[iii]
Volunteers from the U.S. Naval Training Station in Deer Island, Boston, who “appeared to be in excellent physical condition,” took part in the study,[iv] which consisted of the scientists attempting to infect the healthy volunteers with the flu. To do this, they collected various secretions from people sick with the flu — nasal secretions, mucous from their throats and even direct coughing in the face — and exposed the volunteers.
The donors were said to be early in the disease, within the first, second or third day, to ensure they would still be contagious. The infectious substances were then sprayed into the volunteers’ nostrils, throat and eyes, and then the researchers waited 10 days for them to become ill — but “none of them took sick in any way.”[v] Writing in the journal Public Health Reports, John Eyler, Ph. D., of the University of Minnesota, explained:
“[Volunteers] … were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza.”[vi]
Other research has also failed to show human-to-human transmission of influenza, with one 2013 review conducted by U.S. CDC scientists and colleagues concluding, “Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza.”[vii]
Edwin Jordan, a public health scientist who conducted some of the most well-known research into the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic,[viii] also reported in 1927 that five studies failed to demonstrate sick-to-well transmission of influenza.
“Jordan reports that all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients,” according to a review published in Virology in 2008.[ix] Rosenau’s study was the largest among them.
Scientists Caution Against Concluding the Obvious
Even after failing to infect people with the flu despite multiple direct exposures, Rosenau stated, “We must be very careful not to draw any positive conclusions from the negative results of this kind.”[x] At the same time, he acknowledged:
“We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”[xi]
Their report documented eight other studies that also failed to identify how the Spanish flu was spread, but said perhaps other factors were involved relating to how the virus was discharged from or entered the body. Perhaps, some suggested, the volunteers were already immune. But some of the volunteers were specifically included because they had no prior exposure to influenza.
Others suggested that the virus donors may have no longer been infectious, but the patients were said to have been within their first three days of illness, when viral shedding should be at its peak.[xii] “It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions,” Eyler wrote.[xiii]
Their study effectively showed that the 1918 Spanish flu was not a contagious disease, but they still theorized that perhaps if they had been more aggressive in exposing the volunteers (more aggressive than directly spraying “infectious” nasal secretions up someone’s nose?), they would have gotten a different result.
It’s even been suggested that perhaps the donors didn’t actually have the flu at all, but it’s believed that physicians were highly capable of diagnosing influenza in 1918, and all the donors were symptomatic, making this highly unlikely. “Obviously, another explanation is that sick-to-well transmission is not the usual mode of contagion,” the Virology Journal review added.[xiv]
Indeed, the real disease here appears to be in researchers believing what they want to believe — in this case that the Spanish flu was easily transmitted from person to person — even if the science clearly says otherwise.
References
[i] U.S. CDC, 1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1918-pandemic-h1n1.html
[ii] U.S. CDC, 1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1918-pandemic-h1n1.html
[iii] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
[iv] Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza, Boston, November and December 1918, Page 7 https://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3750flu.0016.573
[v] Virology Journal volume 5, Article number: 29 (2008) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1743-422X-5-29
[vi] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
[vii] Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 37, Issue 8, 15 October 2003, Pages 1094-1101, https://doi.org/10.1086/378292 https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/37/8/1094/2013282
[viii] Epidemic Influenza. A Survey. 1927 pp.599 pp. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19292700266
[ix] Virology Journal volume 5, Article number: 29 (2008) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1743-422X-5-29
[x] Medium June 1, 2020 https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/spread-of-spanish-flu-was-never-experimentally-confirmed-9f91b37c4dd8
[xi] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
[xii] Medium June 1, 2020 https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/spread-of-spanish-flu-was-never-experimentally-confirmed-9f91b37c4dd8
[xiii] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/
[xiv] Virology Journal volume 5, Article number: 29 (2008) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1743-422X-5-29


renegadetribune--2020-09-09--Public Support For Sports Implodes As Leagues Embrace Black Lives Matter, Polls Find

Americans have gone from viewing the sports industry positively , on balance , to negatively in the wake of sports leagues embracing the divisive Black Lives Matter movement , a new survey found .
According to a Gallup survey conducted Jul 30-Aug 12 , 2020 , only 30 % of Americans view the industry positively versus 40 % who view it negatively , giving the industry an overall rating of -10 .
In Aug 2019 , the industry ’ s overall rating was +20 , with 45 % viewing it positively and 25 % negatively .
There has been a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Democrats ’ view of the sports industry has not changed significantly in the past year , while Republicans ’ has slipped from a +11 net-positive score in 2019 to a net -35 today , and independents ’ from +26 to -10 , ” Gallup reported .
“ The sports industry ’ s image has also deteriorated more among women than men , and among older adults than those younger than 35 .
Sports has also lost more support from non-White than White Americans , but given the extraordinarily high ratings from non-White @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continues to view the sports industry positively on balance today .
That is not the case with White adults , who now view the sports industry more negatively than positively , and by a 22-point margin.
” Another Harris poll released last week found 39 percent of NBA fans say they ’ re watching fewer games .
“ ‘ The league has become too political ’ was the clear choice for the decline , with 38 % of respondents , ” The Harris Poll reported .
“ ‘ Boring without fans ’ captured @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NBA ’ s association with China caused 19 % of sports fans to turn the dial.
” Game 7 reported last week that the NBA ’ s ratings are in “ free fall.
” “ Despite the NBA Playoffs being in full swing and all the games having actual , genuine meaning , TV ratings for the first round were down 27 percent year over year , ” Game 7 reported Tuesday .

By Chris Menahan
Americans have gone from viewing the sports industry positively, on balance, to negatively in the wake of sports leagues embracing the divisive Black Lives Matter movement, a new survey found.
According to a Gallup survey conducted Jul 30-Aug 12, 2020, only 30% of Americans view the industry positively versus 40% who view it negatively, giving the industry an overall rating of -10.
In Aug 2019, the industry’s overall rating was +20, with 45% viewing it positively and 25% negatively. There has been a -30 shift in just one year.
“Democrats’ view of the sports industry has not changed significantly in the past year, while Republicans’ has slipped from a +11 net-positive score in 2019 to a net -35 today, and independents’ from +26 to -10,” Gallup reported.
“The sports industry’s image has also deteriorated more among women than men, and among older adults than those younger than 35. Sports has also lost more support from non-White than White Americans, but given the extraordinarily high ratings from non-White adults a year ago, this group continues to view the sports industry positively on balance today. That is not the case with White adults, who now view the sports industry more negatively than positively, and by a 22-point margin.”
Another Harris poll released last week found 39 percent of NBA fans say they’re watching fewer games.
“‘The league has become too political’ was the clear choice for the decline, with 38% of respondents,” The Harris Poll reported. “‘Boring without fans’ captured 28% of the vote while the NBA’s association with China caused 19% of sports fans to turn the dial.”
Game 7 reported last week that the NBA’s ratings are in “free fall.”
“Despite the NBA Playoffs being in full swing and all the games having actual, genuine meaning, TV ratings for the first round were down 27 percent year over year,” Game 7 reported Tuesday.
This article originally appeared on Information Liberation.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-09-10--Imprisoned England: Gatherings of More Than Six People Banned

Many people now realize that we have been lied to six million ways from Sunday about the “ novel ” coronavirus , but ZOGs around the White world are doubling down on their social control measures , turning their populaces into prisoners .
Here is Health Secretary Matt Hancock talking about how gatherings of more than six need to be banned , over half a year after the onset of the “ pandemic ” , in order to stop the spread .
Indigenous Brits are expected to believe that the jew-run government and media , which have been thoroughly shown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and murder conspiracy , are actually doing all of this to protect the people .
Here is a lengthier BBC report on the “ safe six ” mandate .
The sexual innuendo is not lost on me , and of course , it ’ s no accident that 6 was chosen , just like the number of feet we are supposed to stay away from each other .
Even with the group of six everyone is still expected to maintain social distance and wear masks , or else the neo-Stasi police force will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ barefaced Brits .
These draconian policies are put in place as temporary measures , but there is no end in sight .
Unless the people rebel en masse , people will be forced to wear muzzles , stand six feet apart like retards , and be grounded by big brother for years to come .
Once government restrictions like this are put in place , and nothing is done to stop it , more and more soon to follow .
How much longer will people tolerate being abused by child-raping politicians ?

Many people now realize that we have been lied to six million ways from Sunday about the “novel” coronavirus, but ZOGs around the White world are doubling down on their social control measures, turning their populaces into prisoners.
Here is Health Secretary Matt Hancock talking about how gatherings of more than six need to be banned, over half a year after the onset of the “pandemic”, in order to stop the spread.
Indigenous Brits are expected to believe that the jew-run government and media, which have been thoroughly shown to be involved in a child rape and murder conspiracy, are actually doing all of this to protect the people.
Here is a lengthier BBC report on the “safe six” mandate. The sexual innuendo is not lost on me, and of course, it’s no accident that 6 was chosen, just like the number of feet we are supposed to stay away from each other.
Even with the group of six everyone is still expected to maintain social distance and wear masks, or else the neo-Stasi police force will arrest and fine the evil and dangerous barefaced Brits.
“Based” Boris will put everyone’s fears to rest.
These draconian policies are put in place as temporary measures, but there is no end in sight. Unless the people rebel en masse, people will be forced to wear muzzles, stand six feet apart like retards, and be grounded by big brother for years to come. Once government restrictions like this are put in place, and nothing is done to stop it, more and more soon to follow.
How much longer will people tolerate being abused by child-raping politicians?
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA


renegadetribune--2020-09-10--Benjamin Crump – The Freemason Lawyer

Benjamin Crump – The Freemason Lawyer

There is some crap in this video about how White men never built pyramids , which is some absolute bunkum @ @ @ @ @ Freemason is important , since he is fulfilling the goals of the jew world order @ @ @ @ @ , New York , Oct. 28 , 1927 , Cheshvan 2 , 5688 , Vol @ @ @ @ @ 18 : Masonry is based on Judaism .
Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the @ @ @ @ @ left ?
From Manual of Freemasonry , by Richard Carlile .

There is some crap in this video about how White men never built pyramids, which is some absolute bunkum, but Crump being a Freemason is important, since he is fulfilling the goals of the jew world order.
From The Jewish Tribune, New York, Oct. 28, 1927, Cheshvan 2, 5688, Vol. 91, No. 18:
Masonry is based on Judaism. Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the Masonic ritual and what is left?
From Manual of Freemasonry, by Richard Carlile.
The Grand Lodge Masonry of the present day is wholly Jewish.
262 views
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


Hymn to Dawn

1 .
THE radiant Dawns have risen up for glory , in their white splendour like the waves of waters .
She maketh paths all easy , fair to travel , and , rich , hath shown herself benign and friendly .
2 We see that thou art good : far shines thy lustre ; thy beams , thy splendours have flown up to heaven .
Decking thyself , thou makest bare thy bosom , shining in majesty , thou Goddess Morning .
3 Red are the kine and luminous that bear her the Blessed One who spreadeth through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a valiant archer , like a swift warrior she repelleth darkness .
4 Thy ways are easy on the hills : thou passest Invincible !
Se1f-luminous !
through waters .
So lofty Goddess with thine ample pathway , Daughter of Heaven , bring wealth to give us comfort .
5 Dawn , bring me wealth : untroubled , with thine oxen thou bearest riches at thy will and pleasure ; Thou who , a Goddess , Child of Heaven , hast shown thee lovely through bounty when we called thee early .
6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resting places , so men with store of food rise at thy dawning .
Yea , to the liberal mortal who remaineth at home , O Goddess Dawn , much good thou bringest .

From Rig Veda
tr. by Ralph T.H. Griffith [1896]
1. THE radiant Dawns have risen up for glory, in their white splendour like the waves of waters.
She maketh paths all easy, fair to travel, and, rich, hath shown herself benign and friendly.
2 We see that thou art good: far shines thy lustre; thy beams, thy splendours have flown up to heaven.
Decking thyself, thou makest bare thy bosom, shining in majesty, thou Goddess Morning.
3 Red are the kine and luminous that bear her the Blessed One who spreadeth through the distance.
The foes she chaseth like a valiant archer, like a swift warrior she repelleth darkness.
4 Thy ways are easy on the hills: thou passest Invincible! Se1f-luminous! through waters.
So lofty Goddess with thine ample pathway, Daughter of Heaven, bring wealth to give us comfort.
5 Dawn, bring me wealth: untroubled, with thine oxen thou bearest riches at thy will and pleasure;
Thou who, a Goddess, Child of Heaven, hast shown thee lovely through bounty when we called thee early.
6 As the birds fly forth from their resting places, so men with store of food rise at thy dawning.
Yea, to the liberal mortal who remaineth at home, O Goddess Dawn, much good thou bringest.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-09-10--Landmark FDA Paper On Aluminum Safety In Vaccines Found To Have A Critical Math Error

What Happened : The Physicians For Informed Consent ( PIC ) outline that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ( ATSDR ) , which is a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) have already raised concerns about the negative effects of aluminum exposure in humans .
They state the following : Because some vaccines contain aluminum , the FDA published a paper in 2011 ( Mitkus et al . )
to address concerns about aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines in infants to a safety limit of oral aluminum determined by the ATSDR .
However , this study incorrectly based its calculations on 0.78 % of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream rather than the value of 0.1 % used by the ATSDR in its computations .
As a result , the FDA paper assumed that nearly 8 ( 0.78 % /0.1 % ) times more aluminum can safely enter the bloodstream , and this led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Erratum in “ Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination ” here .
The Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) are a group of doctors and scientists from around the world who have come together to support informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures .
Their information is based on science .
Their mission is to deliver data on infectious diseases and vaccines , and to unite doctors , scientists , healthcare professionals , attorneys , and families who support voluntary vaccinations .
Their vision is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evaluate the data on infectious diseases and vaccines objectively and voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination .
According to Dr , Christopher Shaw , a member of PIC and a professor at the University of British Columbia who has performed numerous studies on the effects of injected aluminum , “ We knew that the Mitkus et al .
paper modeling aluminum clearance had to be inaccurate since it was assuming that injected aluminum kinetics were the same as the kinetics of aluminum acquired through diet .
Now , in addition , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on using the incorrect level of aluminum absorption .
What is particularly striking is that despite all these errors , since 2011 , Mitkus et al .
is used by CDC and other entities as the basis for claiming that aluminum adjuvants are safe.
” Dr. Shira Miller , president of PIC , said , “ We posted the Mitkus 2011 erratum on ResearchGate in hopes of bringing it to the attention of scientists and researchers who are interested in the safety of the quantities of injected aluminum found in childhood vaccines and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ research the safety concern.
” When you inject aluminum , it goes into a different compartment of your body .
It doesn ’ t come into that same mechanism of excretion .
So , and of course it can ’ t because that ’ s the whole idea of aluminum adjuvants , aluminum adjuvants are meant to stick around and allow that antigen to be presented over and over and over again persistently , otherwise you wouldn ’ t put an adjuvant in in the first place .
It can ’ t be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it couldn ’ t do the things it does .
It can ’ t be excreted because again it couldn ’ t provide that prolonged exposure of the antigen to your immune system.- Shaw The PIC has released a PDF called Aluminum Vaccine Risk Statement with a lot more information .
You can access it here .
Why This Is Important : The idea that it ’ s safe to inject children with aluminum containing vaccines is based on presumption .
No appropriate safety studies exist to show this is the case , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from multiple countries recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “ The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent , rigorous and honest science ” state the following , The publication goes on to address concerns it has with another paper that was published a year prior , emphasizing that the authors of that specific publication , JP Goullé & L Grangeot-Keros , Described general knowledge on aluminum ( Al ) exposure , kinetics and toxicity but made very little effort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Al adjuvants in vaccines .
Instead of representing the bulk of their review , the subject of Al adjuvants covered no more than one third of the 3 page-text .
Numerous important papers on the topic were omitted , i.e .
20 years of scientific publications in clinical , post-mortem , in vitro and in vivo experimental studies published by independent research teams , worldwide experts in this topic , were simply omitted .

What Happened: The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) outline that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), which is a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have already raised concerns about the negative effects of aluminum exposure in humans.
They state the following:
Because some vaccines contain aluminum, the FDA published a paper in 2011 (Mitkus et al.) to address concerns about aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants. The paper compared the aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants to a safety limit of oral aluminum determined by the ATSDR. However, this study incorrectly based its calculations on 0.78% of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream rather than the value of 0.1% used by the ATSDR in its computations. As a result, the FDA paper assumed that nearly 8 (0.78%/0.1%) times more aluminum can safely enter the bloodstream, and this led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety limit.
You can read their “Erratum in “Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination” here.
The Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) are a group of doctors and scientists from around the world who have come together to support informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures. Their information is based on science. Their mission is to deliver data on infectious diseases and vaccines, and to unite doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary vaccinations. Their vision is that doctors and the public are able to evaluate the data on infectious diseases and vaccines objectively and voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination.
According to Dr, Christopher Shaw, a member of PIC and a professor at the University of British Columbia who has performed numerous studies on the effects of injected aluminum,
“We knew that the Mitkus et al. paper modeling aluminum clearance had to be inaccurate since it was assuming that injected aluminum kinetics were the same as the kinetics of aluminum acquired through diet. Now, in addition, we see that they did their modeling based on using the incorrect level of aluminum absorption. What is particularly striking is that despite all these errors, since 2011, Mitkus et al. is used by CDC and other entities as the basis for claiming that aluminum adjuvants are safe.”
Dr. Shira Miller, president of PIC, said, “We posted the Mitkus 2011 erratum on ResearchGate in hopes of bringing it to the attention of scientists and researchers who are interested in the safety of the quantities of injected aluminum found in childhood vaccines and would be in a position to further research the safety concern.”
When you inject aluminum, it goes into a different compartment of your body. It doesn’t come into that same mechanism of excretion. So, and of course it can’t because that’s the whole idea of aluminum adjuvants, aluminum adjuvants are meant to stick around and allow that antigen to be presented over and over and over again persistently, otherwise you wouldn’t put an adjuvant in in the first place. It can’t be inert, because if it were inert it couldn’t do the things it does. It can’t be excreted because again it couldn’t provide that prolonged exposure of the antigen to your immune system.- Shaw
The PIC has released a PDF called Aluminum Vaccine Risk Statement with a lot more information. You can access it here.
Why This Is Important: The idea that it’s safe to inject children with aluminum containing vaccines is based on presumption. No appropriate safety studies exist to show this is the case, which is why A group of scientists from multiple countries recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science” state the following,
“The safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA.”
The publication goes on to address concerns it has with another paper that was published a year prior, emphasizing that the authors of that specific publication, JP Goullé & L Grangeot-Keros,


renegadetribune--2020-09-10--DHS Warns “White Supremacy” Is The Most Lethal Threat to the US

While corporate-funded BLM and their Antifa comrades in arms burn down cities , loot and pillage , terrorize average Americans , and murder those who do not go along with their agenda , the DHS wants to remind us that White people who don ’ t hate themselves are the real lethal threat to the US .
We are truly living in a bizarro world , where everything has been completely flipped upside down .
The Department of Homeland Security draft documents , which were recently made public , warn of the looming threat of White supremacist terrorism .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capitalizing on social and political tensions in 2020 and present an “ elevated threat environment ” at least through early next year .
The recently released draft reports , which were made public by Lawfare Editor in Chief Benjamin Wittes and first reported by Politico , mentions a host of threats , including cyber , foreign influence and irregular migration .
All three drafts state that white supremacist extremists are the deadliest threat .
However , the placement and language about white supremacy in three versions of the DHS draft documents differ slightly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ State of the Homeland Threat Assessment 2020 ” drafts reads : “ We judge that ideologically-motivated lone offenders and small groups will pose the greatest terrorist threat to the Homeland through 2021 , with white supremacist extremists presenting the most lethal threat.
” On what do they base their findings ?
A briefing given by the ADL ’ s Greenblatt ?
Maybe the SPLC ’ s intelligence report ?
What credible evidence do they have that any White people are actually planning to terrorize the American public ?
Well , I guess @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” but we all know that is a complete fed PsyOp , just like AtomWaffen and the rest .
The DHS is out chasing and creating White boogeymen , while ignoring the giant elephant in the room , which is the race war being waged against White people .
The later DHS drafts were changed somewhat , but still maintain that White people who don ’ t hate themselves are the greatest deadly threat America is facing .
The lead section on terror threats to the homeland is changed in the latter two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” with “ Domestic Violent Extremists presenting the most persistent and lethal threat.
” The reports , however , all contain this language : “ Among DVEs [ Domestic Violent Extremists ] , we judge that white supremacist extremists ( WSEs ) will remain the most persistent and lethal threat in the Homeland through 2021.
” This demonization of White people as terrorists has been going on for quite some time , with the DHS prioritizing fighting “ White supremacism ” last year .
Then-acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan said last year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most “ potent ideologies ” driving acts violence in the U.S. , when he released the department ’ s counterterrorism strategy , outlining the ongoing threats from foreign terrorism and focusing on domestic terror threats , particularly white supremacism .
“ In our modern age , the continued menace of racially based violent extremism , particularly white supremacist extremism , is an abhorrent affront to the nation , the struggle and unity of its diverse population , ” he said in a speech at the Brookings Institution almost a year ago .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to see through ZOG reports like this , and recognize how the reality of the situation is much different than what our overlords are telling us .
The greatest lethal threat to the American people is ( and always has been ) the US federal government itself .
They are the real terrorists .
Look at how many innocent people have died at the hands of ZOG at home and abroad , and yet they have the audacity ( or chutzpah ) to lecture to us about how innocent White people pose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ZOG must be dismantled before we can ever hope to achieve any lasting peace .

While corporate-funded BLM and their Antifa comrades in arms burn down cities, loot and pillage, terrorize average Americans, and murder those who do not go along with their agenda, the DHS wants to remind us that White people who don’t hate themselves are the real lethal threat to the US. We are truly living in a bizarro world, where everything has been completely flipped upside down.
The Department of Homeland Security draft documents, which were recently made public, warn of the looming threat of White supremacist terrorism. The latest details how US-based violent extremisst are capitalizing on social and political tensions in 2020 and present an “elevated threat environment” at least through early next year.
The first version of the report, which is from 8/19/2020, states baldly that white supremacist actors are the biggest threat right now. Here's the discussion in the executive summary up top: pic.twitter.com/m7NE9LMPC1 — Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) September 4, 2020
Here is the full document.https://t.co/Uic4OVr2YD — Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) September 4, 2020
According to WMUR:
The recently released draft reports, which were made public by Lawfare Editor in Chief Benjamin Wittes and first reported by Politico, mentions a host of threats, including cyber, foreign influence and irregular migration. All three drafts state that white supremacist extremists are the deadliest threat. However, the placement and language about white supremacy in three versions of the DHS draft documents differ slightly. The earliest available version of the “State of the Homeland Threat Assessment 2020” drafts reads: “We judge that ideologically-motivated lone offenders and small groups will pose the greatest terrorist threat to the Homeland through 2021, with white supremacist extremists presenting the most lethal threat.”
On what do they base their findings? A briefing given by the ADL’s Greenblatt? Maybe the SPLC’s intelligence report? What credible evidence do they have that any White people are actually planning to terrorize the American public? Well, I guess there are the “Boogaloo Boys,” but we all know that is a complete fed PsyOp, just like AtomWaffen and the rest. The DHS is out chasing and creating White boogeymen, while ignoring the giant elephant in the room, which is the race war being waged against White people.
The later DHS drafts were changed somewhat, but still maintain that White people who don’t hate themselves are the greatest deadly threat America is facing.
The lead section on terror threats to the homeland is changed in the latter two drafts to replace “white supremacist extremists” with “Domestic Violent Extremists presenting the most persistent and lethal threat.” The reports, however, all contain this language: “Among DVEs [Domestic Violent Extremists], we judge that white supremacist extremists (WSEs) will remain the most persistent and lethal threat in the Homeland through 2021.”
This demonization of White people as terrorists has been going on for quite some time, with the DHS prioritizing fighting “White supremacism” last year.
Then-acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan said last year white supremacist extremism is one of the most “potent ideologies” driving acts violence in the U.S., when he released the department’s counterterrorism strategy, outlining the ongoing threats from foreign terrorism and focusing on domestic terror threats, particularly white supremacism. “In our modern age, the continued menace of racially based violent extremism, particularly white supremacist extremism, is an abhorrent affront to the nation, the struggle and unity of its diverse population,” he said in a speech at the Brookings Institution almost a year ago.
I hope the average American will increasingly be able to see through ZOG reports like this, and recognize how the reality of the situation is much different than what our overlords are telling us.
The greatest lethal threat to the American people is (and always has been) the US federal government itself. They are the real terrorists. Look at how many innocent people have died at the hands of ZOG at home and abroad, and yet they have the audacity (or chutzpah) to lecture to us about how innocent White people pose an existential threat to the country. ZOG must be dismantled before we can ever hope to achieve any lasting peace.
Related:
http://www.renegadetribune.com/bill-congress-targets-white-supremacists-right-wing-extremists-greatest-domestic-terrorism-threat/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/fbi-elevates-threat-of-white-nationalists-and-neo-nazis-to-same-level-as-isis/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/white-supremacists-next-target-in-global-war-on-terror/
http://www.renegadetribune.com/new-jersey-raises-white-supremacist-extremists-to-highest-possible-threat-level/
Share now!
Author: Kyle Hunt Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Kyle is the publisher of the Renegade Tribune and the founder of Renegade Broadcasting , where he hosts The Solar Storm . He also organized the 2014 White Man March and created the film adaptation of Hellstorm . You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA