renegadetribune--2020-01-21--In the Name of ‘Israel’s Security’, Retreating US Gives it Billions More in Military Aid

Billions of US taxpayers ’ dollars will continue to be funnelled into Israel in the next fiscal year , and for many years in the foreseeable future .
Republican and Democratic Senators have recently ensured just that , passing a Bill aimed at providing Israel with $ 3.3 billion in aid every year .
The Bill , co-sponsored by Democratic Senator Chris Coons and Republican Senator Marco Rubio , was passed on 9 January , only one day after Iran struck US positions in Iraq .
Enthusiasm to push the Bill forward was meant to be an assurance to Tel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committed to Israel ’ s security and military superiority in the Middle East .
Despite a palpable sense of war fatigue among all Americans , regardless of their political leaning , their country continues to sink deeper into Middle East conflicts simply because it is unable – or perhaps unwilling — to challenge Israel ’ s benefactors across the US government .
“ What ’ s good for Israel is good for America ” continues to be the supreme maxim within Washington ’ s political elites , despite the fact that such irrational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ East as a whole , and is finally forcing a hasty and humiliating American retreat .
The latest aid package to Israel will officially put into law a “ Memorandum of Understanding ” that was reached between the right-wing government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Barack Obama administration in 2016 .
At the time , Obama had offered Israel the largest military aid package in US history .
Senator Rubio explained the passing of the recent Bill in terms of the “ unprecedented threats ” that are supposedly faced by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that “ the events of the past few days [ the US-Iran escalation ] , were a stark reminder of the importance of US assistance to Israel ’ s security.
” What is particularly odd about Coons ’ statement is the fact that it was not Israel , but US positions in Iraq that were struck by Iranian missiles , and that they were fired in response to the killing of Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani .
Yet , the American taxpayers ’ funding of Israel ’ s military adventures continues unabated , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Middle East , and the shifting US role in the region .
This confirms further that the blind US support of Israel is not motivated by a centralised , distinctly American , strategy that aims to serve US interests .
Instead , the unconditional – and , often , self-defeating — US government funding of the Israeli war machine is linked largely to domestic American politics and , indeed , the unparalleled power wielded by the pro-Israel lobby in the United States .
According to the public policy research institute of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Centre ( CRS ) , between 1946 and 2019 ( including the requested funds for 2020 ) US aid to Israel has exceeded $ 142 billion .
Most of this immense sum of money — over $ 101 billion — went directly to the Israeli military budget , while over $ 34 billion and $ 7 billion went to Israel in terms of economic aid and missile defence funding respectively .
It is becoming increasingly obvious that the US no longer possesses a well-defined and centralised strategy in the Middle East ; President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speech or tweet to the next .
However , the one consistent key phrase in whatever political agenda happens to be championed by Washington in the region at any particular time is : “ Israel ’ s security ” .
This precarious term seems to be linked to every American action pertaining to the Middle East , as it has for decades under every American administration , without exception .
Wars have been launched or funded in the name of Israel ’ s security ; human rights have been violated on a massive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — military occupation of Palestine , the protracted siege of the impoverished Gaza Strip and much more , have all been carried out , defended and sustained in the name of Israel ’ s security .
US aid to Israel — the occupying state — continues , while all American aid to the Palestinians — the people under Israeli occupation — has been cut off , including the $ 300 million annual donation to the UN Agency responsible for the welfare of Palestinian refugees , UNRWA .
The Agency has provided education , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since 1949 , but is now , bizarrely , seen by both Israel and the US as “ an obstacle to peace ” .
Inexplicably , Israel receives roughly “ one-third of the American foreign-aid budget , even though ( it ) comprises just .001 percent of the world ’ s population and already has one of the world ’ s higher per capita incomes , ” wrote Professor Stephen Zunes in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs .
This massive budget includes much more than the $ 3.3 billion of annual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perks rarely make headlines .
Anywhere between $ 500 million to $ 800 million is given to Israel every year as part of a missile defence package ; an additional $ 1 billion benefits Israel in the form of tax-deductible donations , while $ 500 billion is invested in Israeli bonds .
Then there are the loan guarantees , where the US government assumes the responsibility for billions of dollars that Israel can access as a borrower from international creditors .
If Israel defaults on its loans , it is the legal responsibility @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest on the borrowed money .
Since 1982 , Israel has been receiving US aid as a lump sum , as opposed to scheduled payments , as happens with other countries .
To fulfil its self-imposed obligations to Israel , the US government borrows the money , and is thus left to pay interest on the loans .
“ Israel even lends some of this money back through US treasury bills and collects the additional interest , ” Zunes explained .
US relations with Israel are not governed by the kind of political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But they are not entirely irrational either , as the American ruling classes have aligned their interests , their perception of the Middle East and their country ’ s role in that region with that of Israel , thanks to years of media and official indoctrination .
Despite the fact that the US is retreating from the region , lacking strategy and future vision , lawmakers in Washington are congratulating themselves on passing yet another generous aid package to Israel .
They feel proud of their great feat because , in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israel is the only guarantor of US dominance in the Middle East .
That is a theory that has been proven false , time and time again .

By Ramzy Baroud
Billions of US taxpayers’ dollars will continue to be funnelled into Israel in the next fiscal year, and for many years in the foreseeable future. Republican and Democratic Senators have recently ensured just that, passing a Bill aimed at providing Israel with $3.3 billion in aid every year.
The Bill, co-sponsored by Democratic Senator Chris Coons and Republican Senator Marco Rubio, was passed on 9 January, only one day after Iran struck US positions in Iraq. Enthusiasm to push the Bill forward was meant to be an assurance to Tel Aviv from Washington that the US is committed to Israel’s security and military superiority in the Middle East.
Despite a palpable sense of war fatigue among all Americans, regardless of their political leaning, their country continues to sink deeper into Middle East conflicts simply because it is unable – or perhaps unwilling — to challenge Israel’s benefactors across the US government. “What’s good for Israel is good for America” continues to be the supreme maxim within Washington’s political elites, despite the fact that such irrational thinking has wrought disasters on the Middle East as a whole, and is finally forcing a hasty and humiliating American retreat.
The latest aid package to Israel will officially put into law a “Memorandum of Understanding” that was reached between the right-wing government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Barack Obama administration in 2016. At the time, Obama had offered Israel the largest military aid package in US history.
Senator Rubio explained the passing of the recent Bill in terms of the “unprecedented threats” that are supposedly faced by Israel. Coons, meanwhile, said that “the events of the past few days [the US-Iran escalation], were a stark reminder of the importance of US assistance to Israel’s security.”
What is particularly odd about Coons’ statement is the fact that it was not Israel, but US positions in Iraq that were struck by Iranian missiles, and that they were fired in response to the killing of Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani.
Yet, the American taxpayers’ funding of Israel’s military adventures continues unabated, despite the rapidly changing political reality in the Middle East, and the shifting US role in the region. This confirms further that the blind US support of Israel is not motivated by a centralised, distinctly American, strategy that aims to serve US interests. Instead, the unconditional – and, often, self-defeating — US government funding of the Israeli war machine is linked largely to domestic American politics and, indeed, the unparalleled power wielded by the pro-Israel lobby in the United States.

According to the public policy research institute of the United States Congress, the Congressional Research Centre (CRS), between 1946 and 2019 (including the requested funds for 2020) US aid to Israel has exceeded $142 billion. Most of this immense sum of money — over $101 billion — went directly to the Israeli military budget, while over $34 billion and $7 billion went to Israel in terms of economic aid and missile defence funding respectively.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that the US no longer possesses a well-defined and centralised strategy in the Middle East; President Donald Trump changes American priorities from one speech or tweet to the next. However, the one consistent key phrase in whatever political agenda happens to be championed by Washington in the region at any particular time is: “Israel’s security”.
This precarious term seems to be linked to every American action pertaining to the Middle East, as it has for decades under every American administration, without exception. Wars have been launched or funded in the name of Israel’s security; human rights have been violated on a massive scale; the five-decade — and counting — military occupation of Palestine, the protracted siege of the impoverished Gaza Strip and much more, have all been carried out, defended and sustained in the name of Israel’s security.
US aid to Israel — the occupying state — continues, while all American aid to the Palestinians — the people under Israeli occupation — has been cut off, including the $300 million annual donation to the UN Agency responsible for the welfare of Palestinian refugees, UNRWA. The Agency has provided education, healthcare and shelter for millions of refugees since 1949, but is now, bizarrely, seen by both Israel and the US as “an obstacle to peace”.
Inexplicably, Israel receives roughly “one-third of the American foreign-aid budget, even though (it) comprises just .001 percent of the world’s population and already has one of the world’s higher per capita incomes,” wrote Professor Stephen Zunes in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
This massive budget includes much more than the $3.3 billion of annual funding, but the other amounts and perks rarely make headlines. Anywhere between $500 million to $800 million is given to Israel every year as part of a missile defence package; an additional $1 billion benefits Israel in the form of tax-deductible donations, while $500 billion is invested in Israeli bonds.
Then there are the loan guarantees, where the US government assumes the responsibility for billions of dollars that Israel can access as a borrower from international creditors. If Israel defaults on its loans, it is the legal responsibility of the US government to offset the interest on the borrowed money.
Since 1982, Israel has been receiving US aid as a lump sum, as opposed to scheduled payments, as happens with other countries. To fulfil its self-imposed obligations to Israel, the US government borrows the money, and is thus left to pay interest on the loans. “Israel even lends some of this money back through US treasury bills and collects the additional interest,” Zunes explained.
US relations with Israel are not governed by the kind of political wisdom that is predicated on mutual benefit. But they are not entirely irrational either, as the American ruling classes have aligned their interests, their perception of the Middle East and their country’s role in that region with that of Israel, thanks to years of media and official indoctrination.
Despite the fact that the US is retreating from the region, lacking strategy and future vision, lawmakers in Washington are congratulating themselves on passing yet another generous aid package to Israel. They feel proud of their great feat because, in their confused thinking, a ‘secured’ Israel is the only guarantor of US dominance in the Middle East. That is a theory that has been proven false, time and time again.
This article originally appeared on Middle East Monitor.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-01-23--Bernie Sanders and the True Nature of the State

I mostly try to avoid the counterproductive partisan nonsense between the two sides of the one-sided political system .
Occasionally , however , extreme polarization and quibbling over minor issues by antagonistic factions—made hysterical by the echo chamber of political inanities and mental illness—results in revealing what one side would do to the other if it held the rein of state and exercised its prerogative of violence .
Martin Weissgerber , a top-level Bernie Sanders organizer , was secretly videotaped by Project Veritas .
He advocates rounding up his political opponents in throwing them in “ re-education ” gulags .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ heads should be liberated from their bodies .
South Carolina @ BernieSanders Field Organizer @ martinthemanic : `` I 'll straight up get armed…I 'm ready for the `` f**king revolution '' ; `` Guillotine the rich '' ; 'send Republicans to re-education camps ' No doubt Mr. Weissgerber , who appears to be in his 20s , would celebrate a Bernie version of the NKVD troikas , the simplified Soviet system of ferreting out and punishing political opponents .
The commie troikas did not allow for the presumption of innocence or legal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply assumed when the state accused somebody of being an “ anti-Soviet element , ” guilt was indisputable and prison or execution inescapable .
That ’ s what the kid Weissgerber dreams of for America—a sweeping cultural revolution not much different than the one Mao organized in China , resulting in the murder of millions .
It is estimated during Mao ’ s rule around 80 million people were murdered directly and indirectly by the state .
Mao made Hitler and Stalin look like rank amateurs in the practice of mass-murdering political opponents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be interesting to get Weissgerber ’ s take on the Khmer Rouge , the Communist Party of Kampuchea ( Cambodia ) .
His ideology is similar to the Khmer Rouge with mention of guillotines and forced re-education .
The Khmer Rouge ’ s Maha Lout Ploh—a repeat of Mao ’ s cultural revolution and ( sic ) Great Leap Forward—ultimately resulted in the organized murder of more than three million people .
This overgrown child living the violent dream of a now geriatric Weather Underground psychopath was undoubtedly trained to hate and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ professors and instructors “ teaching ” at “ public ” ( state-run and taxpayer-financed ) institutions .
It is likely he harbored violent and envious fantasies before attaining a position as a top-level Bernie Sanders organizer and political activist .
It ’ s not likely Bernie Sanders will become president .
He will simply fade into the background after Trump is re-elected or a Democrat acceptable to the ruling elite—think dementia candidate Joe Biden—is selected to read from the teleprompter .
If Trump is indeed re-elected—and this is certainly a possibility now that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Weissgerber will take to the street in Antifa fashion , assaulting enemies pointed out by their autocratic leaders and theorists .
This will result in furious retaliation and a further widening of the dangerous polarity between political factions .
This division , polarity , and simmering hate between political groups will ultimately result in an all-out war in America—probably between now and the election , and definitely after if Trump is voted back into office .
I have no idea how all of this will play out .
I know , however , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advocating and practicing violence against their opponents on behalf of the state—and this is precisely what Weissgerber is advocating in turn if the Bernie vanguard makes it to the Oval Office—are often the first to be singled out , accused , tortured , imprisoned , and executed as “ counter-revolutionary ” by the new government .
This is what happened to Mao ’ s Gang of Four after the murderous “ reforms ” in China failed .
The state invariably requires patsies and false flag events to deflect blame and distract the masses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problems and real solutions .
This article originally appeared on Another Day in the Empire .

I mostly try to avoid the counterproductive partisan nonsense between the two sides of the one-sided political system. Occasionally, however, extreme polarization and quibbling over minor issues by antagonistic factions—made hysterical by the echo chamber of political inanities and mental illness—results in revealing what one side would do to the other if it held the rein of state and exercised its prerogative of violence. Martin Weissgerber, a top-level Bernie Sanders organizer, was secretly videotaped by Project Veritas. He advocates rounding up his political opponents in throwing them in “re-education” gulags. As for millionaires, he believes their heads should be liberated from their bodies. BREAKING: 2ND PAID STAFFER PRAISES GULAGS South Carolina @BernieSanders Field Organizer @martinthemanic: "I'll straight up get armed…I'm ready for the "f**king revolution"; "Guillotine the rich"; 'send Republicans to re-education camps' FULL RELEASE 12:00PM#Expose2020 pic.twitter.com/tUCeKEY6aM — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) January 21, 2020 No doubt Mr. Weissgerber, who appears to be in his 20s, would celebrate a Bernie version of the NKVD troikas, the simplified Soviet system of ferreting out and punishing political opponents. The commie troikas did not allow for the presumption of innocence or legal representation of the accused. It was simply assumed when the state accused somebody of being an “anti-Soviet element,” guilt was indisputable and prison or execution inescapable.
That’s what the kid Weissgerber dreams of for America—a sweeping cultural revolution not much different than the one Mao organized in China, resulting in the murder of millions. It is estimated during Mao’s rule around 80 million people were murdered directly and indirectly by the state. Mao made Hitler and Stalin look like rank amateurs in the practice of mass-murdering political opponents while centralizing and consolidating power.
It would be interesting to get Weissgerber’s take on the Khmer Rouge, the Communist Party of Kampuchea (Cambodia). His ideology is similar to the Khmer Rouge with mention of guillotines and forced re-education. The Khmer Rouge’s Maha Lout Ploh—a repeat of Mao’s cultural revolution and (sic) Great Leap Forward—ultimately resulted in the organized murder of more than three million people.
This overgrown child living the violent dream of a now geriatric Weather Underground psychopath was undoubtedly trained to hate and advocate murder by “cultural Marxist” professors and instructors “teaching” at “public” (state-run and taxpayer-financed) institutions. It is likely he harbored violent and envious fantasies before attaining a position as a top-level Bernie Sanders organizer and political activist.
It’s not likely Bernie Sanders will become president. He will simply fade into the background after Trump is re-elected or a Democrat acceptable to the ruling elite—think dementia candidate Joe Biden—is selected to read from the teleprompter.
If Trump is indeed re-elected—and this is certainly a possibility now that impeachment is basically a nonstarter—demented fantasists like Weissgerber will take to the street in Antifa fashion, assaulting enemies pointed out by their autocratic leaders and theorists. This will result in furious retaliation and a further widening of the dangerous polarity between political factions.
This division, polarity, and simmering hate between political groups will ultimately result in an all-out war in America—probably between now and the election, and definitely after if Trump is voted back into office.
I have no idea how all of this will play out. I know, however, looking back at history, that people advocating and practicing violence against their opponents on behalf of the state—and this is precisely what Weissgerber is advocating in turn if the Bernie vanguard makes it to the Oval Office—are often the first to be singled out, accused, tortured, imprisoned, and executed as “counter-revolutionary” by the new government. This is what happened to Mao’s Gang of Four after the murderous “reforms” in China failed.
The state invariably requires patsies and false flag events to deflect blame and distract the masses of ill-informed and propagandized citizens from real problems and real solutions.
This article originally appeared on Another Day in the Empire.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-01-23--‘It’s OK to be White’ Labeled a ‘Racial Hatred Message’ by UK Media

The statement “ It ’ s OK to be white ” is a “ racial hatred message ” which “ takes aim at people of colour , ” at least according to the UK media .
Southport ’ s OTS News ran an article last week on some graffiti painted on a park wall saying “ It ’ s ok to be white ” with the title , “ Racial hatred message daubed on park wall.
” Racist and anti ethnic graffiti has been daubed in 20 foot high letters on the side of a gable wall in Southport .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ people of colour reads ‘ it ’ s ok to be white ’ was painted on the side wall adjacent to Bedford Park in Southport overnight .
Shocked residents in the area said they were appalled to wake up to face the graffiti and have called the police and council to sort it out .
Last month , Scotland ’ s deputy first minister John Swinney said some posters saying “ It ’ s Okay to be White ” that were put up around Perth were “ atrocious , ” “ unacceptable ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or any other part ” of Scotland .
Newsweek described the posters as “ racist.
” Here in America , Western Connecticut State University president John Clark in November called in the FBI to investigate IOTBW flyers which he labeled “ disgusting , ” “ despicable ” and “ utterly unacceptable ” and a student at the Oklahoma City University School of Law was even expelled after posting said flyers .
The clear message being sent is “ it ’ s not okay to be white.
” This attitude corresponds with a new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they view their own in-group in a negative light .
In-group bias is a widely recognized phenomenon .
In recent survey data , every group measured–from black conservatives to Asian-moderates–shows a significant , and unsurprising , in-group preference .
Except for white liberals , who show significant out-group bias–meaning white liberals prefer nonwhites to whites .
[ … ] Out-group bias is not shared by liberal Asians , Latinos or African Americans , all of whom have more typical in-group preferences .
The recent GenForward survey from the University of Chicago , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on race and ethnicity , suggests that young white liberals harbor a dislike for whites .
( I am indebted to Zach Goldberg , a doctoral student at Georgia State University , who graphed all of the survey data presented here . )
When looking at the GenForward data ( all surveys were done confidentially online to minimize social desirability bias ) , whites of all ethnic groups had the lowest in-group bias , with moderates having a slightly higher bias than white conservatives .
This would seem to counter the notion pushed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conservatism is some sort of stalking horse for white nationalism .
Using the even larger American National Election Studies ( ANES ) dataset that includes voters of all ages , we observe the same phenomenon .
African-Americans show the highest in-group bias independent of ideology .

By Chris Menahan
The statement “It’s OK to be white” is a “racial hatred message” which “takes aim at people of colour,” at least according to the UK media.
Southport’s OTS News ran an article last week on some graffiti painted on a park wall saying “It’s ok to be white” with the title, “Racial hatred message daubed on park wall.”
From OTS News (HT: National File):
Racist and anti ethnic graffiti has been daubed in 20 foot high letters on the side of a gable wall in Southport. The massive graffiti which takes aim at people of colour reads ‘it’s ok to be white’ was painted on the side wall adjacent to Bedford Park in Southport overnight. Shocked residents in the area said they were appalled to wake up to face the graffiti and have called the police and council to sort it out.
Last month, Scotland’s deputy first minister John Swinney said some posters saying “It’s Okay to be White” that were put up around Perth were “atrocious,” “unacceptable” and have “no place in Perth or any other part” of Scotland.
This is atrocious and has no place in Perth or any other part of our country. We must stand together to resist this unacceptable material. https://t.co/TjRBNycKJ2 — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) December 17, 2019
Newsweek described the posters as “racist.”
Racist "It's Okay to Be White" stickers reappear in Scotland https://t.co/U8cIoimnr4 — Newsweek (@Newsweek) December 17, 2019
Here in America, Western Connecticut State University president John Clark in November called in the FBI to investigate IOTBW flyers which he labeled “disgusting,” “despicable” and “utterly unacceptable” and a student at the Oklahoma City University School of Law was even expelled after posting said flyers.
The clear message being sent is “it’s not okay to be white.”
This attitude corresponds with a new phenomenon found exclusively among white liberals whereby they view their own in-group in a negative light.
As American Greatness reported last year:
In-group bias is a widely recognized phenomenon. In recent survey data, every group measured–from black conservatives to Asian-moderates–shows a significant, and unsurprising, in-group preference. Except for white liberals, who show significant out-group bias–meaning white liberals prefer nonwhites to whites. […] Out-group bias is not shared by liberal Asians, Latinos or African Americans, all of whom have more typical in-group preferences. The recent GenForward survey from the University of Chicago, the first nationally representative survey of youth focused on race and ethnicity, suggests that young white liberals harbor a dislike for whites. (I am indebted to Zach Goldberg, a doctoral student at Georgia State University, who graphed all of the survey data presented here.)
When looking at the GenForward data (all surveys were done confidentially online to minimize social desirability bias), whites of all ethnic groups had the lowest in-group bias, with moderates having a slightly higher bias than white conservatives. This would seem to counter the notion pushed by many on the Left that contemporary conservatism is some sort of stalking horse for white nationalism.
Using the even larger American National Election Studies (ANES) dataset that includes voters of all ages, we observe the same phenomenon. African-Americans show the highest in-group bias independent of ideology.
This article originally appeared on InformationLiberation.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


Artist and Soldier

Each SS Leitheft has a specific theme .
We thus follow a clear intent .
It is not our desire to simply make each issue interesting .
Whoever seeks distraction and diversion , will seek in vain in these SS Leithefts .
The path of least resistance , namely to demand applause with pleasing , easily digested articles , would be much easier and more comfortable for us .
But for that there are other books and magazines .
In the SS Leithefts we do not want to distract and divert the reader , rather gather his best energies and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ toward his genuine core .
Only so can we help the comrades to fulfil themselves and hence their task in the clan community of the SS and in the folk .
When then in letters the sentence , in similar form , is repeated again and again : “ For me the SS-Leithefts are a strengthening before each new action ” , or if a young artist writes us : “ …Through this article I felt for the first time what I must still find within myself in order to become an artist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we want to go .
The present issue has the theme “ hardness ” .
The soldier knows that hardness is necessary for holding out in combat and for the endurance of discomforts .
He also realizes that , for every work , hardness leads to the goal .
But that , for the understanding of art , one must also pass through the gate of hardness , this will not so readily dawn on him .
Some people consider everything that appeals to them at first sight to be art .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the sacred shrine , and they often refer to the words of the great master : “ Serious is life and happy is art ” .
They do not know how often precisely happy art is achieved with difficulty such as , for example , Mozart gives us .
Others say : “ I understand nothing about it ” , when the talk is about art .
Before they learn what art could mean in their life , too , they lock off its energies from themselves .
Instead , they quickly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the easily digestible fare , with sickly and superficial monstrosities .
For them , an “ oh so charming ’ ’ photograph is preferable as a picture than a work of art whose depth does not reveal itself to them at a fleeting glance .
They consume dozens of three cent cigars while they supposedly have no time to get acquainted with a good book .
But that can not be our standpoint .
Whoever has experienced the difficult war in the east , knows as well , that there are times of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ art for clarity and for the energies that one – even if still hidden – suspects in it .
And then many say : “ How can our position toward struggle and our position toward art be brought into connection with each other ?
Struggle is work , effort , pain and sacrifice .
But from art we expect relaxation and entertainment.
” You say “ relaxation and entertainment ” ?
Why are you , who could demand the highest , so modest ?
Why do you demand so little from art ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , eternal life and divine joy ?
Do you not know that art can give all that ?
But perhaps you do not know what art really means .
Yes , for all too long you have lost your place in life .
Art , like religion , was considered a nice ingredient in life , for evenings and Sunday .
It was a colourful bird – a luxury that one could do without in an emergency .
But what is genuine art in reality ?
It is the purest embodiment of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gift of art , God has bestowed upon man the power to portray his law purely .
An example : Through observance of the laws of race we can , through correct mate selection , more and more bestow upon our race the image that corresponds to the will of God .
Through sports we can bring the individual body closer to the form and task predetermined for it .
In art , however , genius can shape the human body most purely as it should grow according to valid law .
Another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ show in their primeval condition only the rough image in which the creator wants to become visible .
Landscapes formed by pure races come closer to this image .
To shape the image of a landscape , however , in all its splendour , this gift is bestowed by God upon the artist , that means only that artist – another does not deserve this name anyway – who himself forces the creator to reveal himself to him .
That is what is decisive : Only through this iron hardness is the artist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so that he sees his image in the human bodies to be portrayed or in the landscape to be portrayed .
And the artist needs hardness again in order to then capture this image in stone or on canvass .
The measure of hardness that the creative person summons up in order to accomplish his high task can not be measured in every day magnitudes .
Just read once the life descriptions of a Rembrandt , an Andreas Schlütter , a Tilman Riemenschneider , a Schiller , Mozart , Beethoven .
How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to summon up , so that everything fell away that stood in the way hampering the work – external and internal obstacles - , so that only the creative core remained , which was now open to receive and carry out the divine task .
There is only one comparison : that is the hardness of the soldier , who knowingly risks his life .
As in the magnitude of the hardness , so too in the success of the most passionate effort , are soldier and artist related .
Have not many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after all weaknesses had been overcome , become acquainted with that moment in which all the energies are released that had been previously unknown to you ?
It is as if a shell , in which one had been previously enclosed , had split .
One jumps out and feels like a god or a child .
There is no longer any hesitation and reflection , no doubt and considerations .
One acts free and correct , and one can do everything that must be possible at the moment .
That is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ Who can look death in the face , the soldier alone is the free man.
” A young poet of our time must have especially clearly felt this relatedness of the creative moment in the soldier and artist .
He recently wrote us from the middle of the most intense fighting on the eastern front : “ 1 can not express what jubilation and pride is within me .
I could tell a saga from which an entire folk for generations could inspire itself .
I trust that I can one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in my heart during this hour of war .
A gold miner do I want to become in my own heart and pass along everything and enrich all.
” Certainly , with hardness alone neither the soldier nor the artist can force such knowledge .
Other virtues and gifts are also required .
Hardness alone , however , must not be lacking .
And that is what I mean in this essay .
Precisely from this knowledge of the common element in artist and soldier must you , comrades , be able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ genuine art , to a relationship that alone is worthy of you .
The path to there is not easy .
But who else should manage this path if not first you , you who have dealt with the greatest superiority of the Bolsheviks and the toughest bunkers !
This path toward art is certainly a different one than the one many of you even today consider possible .
It does not , however , stand in opposition to your experience that you had as soldiers and fighters , on the contrary , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Despite everything , you have it easier than the artists them-selves .
They pave the path for you , they seek the steep trail and orient you .
But you must walk it yourselves .
That costs sweat and endurance .
On the highest peak of this path waves to you divine reward .
It is certain for you , for it lies within you yourselves .
One or the other has already gotten there “ by coincidence ” .
When there was nothing else left , then he read the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , first reluctantly , until he finally realized that – although one can not devour classical poems or a novel by Kolbenheyer pages at a time – a single genuine poem can convey more energy and life joy than a whole stack of recreational literature .
Whoever has realized that in a clear moment , should also consciously summon up enough hardness to make the highest values accessible to himself .
Then he will , like in the most dangerous moments of combat , in the most difficult hours of his struggle for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , one day suddenly experience the moment , in which this effort becomes fertile and in which he succeeds in lifting treasures which he had not known until then and which he had unsuspectingly passed by .

By Hans Klöcker
Source: SS Leitheft, Year 9, Issue 1
Each SS Leitheft has a specific theme. We thus follow a clear intent.
It is not our desire to simply make each issue interesting. Whoever seeks distraction and diversion, will seek in vain in these SS Leithefts. The path of least resistance, namely to demand applause with pleasing, easily digested articles, would be much easier and more comfortable for us. But for that there are other books and magazines.
In the SS Leithefts we do not want to distract and divert the reader, rather gather his best energies and direct him toward himself, that means toward his genuine core. Only so can we help the comrades to fulfil themselves and hence their task in the clan community of the SS and in the folk. When then in letters the sentence, in similar form, is repeated again and again: “For me the SS-Leithefts are a strengthening before each new action”, or if a young artist writes us: “…Through this article I felt for the first time what I must still find within myself in order to become an artist”, then such examples indicate where we want to go.
The present issue has the theme “hardness”. The soldier knows that hardness is necessary for holding out in combat and for the endurance of discomforts. He also realizes that, for every work, hardness leads to the goal.
But that, for the understanding of art, one must also pass through the gate of hardness, this will not so readily dawn on him.
Some people consider everything that appeals to them at first sight to be art. They believe they have thus so effortlessly penetrated into the sacred shrine, and they often refer to the words of the great master: “Serious is life and happy is art”. They do not know how often precisely happy art is achieved with difficulty such as, for example, Mozart gives us.
Others say: “I understand nothing about it”, when the talk is about art. Before they learn what art could mean in their life, too, they lock off its energies from themselves. Instead, they quickly make themselves satisfied with substitutes, with the easily digestible fare, with sickly and superficial monstrosities. For them, an “oh so charming’’ photograph is preferable as a picture than a work of art whose depth does not reveal itself to them at a fleeting glance. They consume dozens of three cent cigars while they supposedly have no time to get acquainted with a good book. But that cannot be our standpoint.
Whoever has experienced the difficult war in the east, knows as well, that there are times of reflection, when one looks precisely to art for clarity and for the energies that one – even if still hidden – suspects in it.
And then many say: “How can our position toward struggle and our position toward art be brought into connection with each other? Struggle is work, effort, pain and sacrifice. But from art we expect relaxation and entertainment.”
You say “relaxation and entertainment”? Why are you, who could demand the highest, so modest? Why do you demand so little from art? Why do you not demand creative strength, eternal life and divine joy? Do you not know that art can give all that? But perhaps you do not know what art really means. Yes, for all too long you have lost your place in life. Art, like religion, was considered a nice ingredient in life, for evenings and Sunday. It was a colourful bird – a luxury that one could do without in an emergency.
But what is genuine art in reality? It is the purest embodiment of the meaning of the world. Through the gift of art, God has bestowed upon man the power to portray his law purely.
An example: Through observance of the laws of race we can, through correct mate selection, more and more bestow upon our race the image that corresponds to the will of God. Through sports we can bring the individual body closer to the form and task predetermined for it. In art, however, genius can shape the human body most purely as it should grow according to valid law.
Another example: The landscapes of the earth show in their primeval condition only the rough image in which the creator wants to become visible. Landscapes formed by pure races come closer to this image. To shape the image of a landscape, however, in all its splendour, this gift is bestowed by God upon the artist, that means only that artist – another does not deserve this name anyway – who himself forces the creator to reveal himself to him.
That is what is decisive: Only through this iron hardness is the artist able to force God into his breast, so that he sees his image in the human bodies to be portrayed or in the landscape to be portrayed. And the artist needs hardness again in order to then capture this image in stone or on canvass.
The measure of hardness that the creative person summons up in order to accomplish his high task cannot be measured in every day magnitudes. Just read once the life descriptions of a Rembrandt, an Andreas Schlütter, a Tilman Riemenschneider, a Schiller, Mozart, Beethoven. How much hardness against themselves did they have to summon up, so that everything fell away that stood in the way hampering the work – external and internal obstacles -, so that only the creative core remained, which was now open to receive and carry out the divine task. There is only one comparison: that is the hardness of the soldier, who knowingly risks his life.
As in the magnitude of the hardness, so too in the success of the most passionate effort, are soldier and artist related.
Have not many of you during the greatest danger, after all weaknesses had been overcome, become acquainted with that moment in which all the energies are released that had been previously unknown to you?
It is as if a shell, in which one had been previously enclosed, had split. One jumps out and feels like a god or a child. There is no longer any hesitation and reflection, no doubt and considerations. One acts free and correct, and one can do everything that must be possible at the moment. That is the feeling that Schiller means when he wrote: “Who can look death in the face, the soldier alone is the free man.”
A young poet of our time must have especially clearly felt this relatedness of the creative moment in the soldier and artist. He recently wrote us from the middle of the most intense fighting on the eastern front: “1 cannot express what jubilation and pride is within me. I could tell a saga from which an entire folk for generations could inspire itself. I trust that I can one day pull out what I have buried in my heart during this hour of war. A gold miner do I want to become in my own heart and pass along everything and enrich all.”
Certainly, with hardness alone neither the soldier nor the artist can force such knowledge. Other virtues and gifts are also required. Hardness alone, however, must not be lacking.
And that is what I mean in this essay. Precisely from this knowledge of the common element in artist and soldier must you, comrades, be able to achieve a new, fortunate relationship to genuine art, to a relationship that alone is worthy of you. The path to there is not easy. But who else should manage this path if not first you, you who have dealt with the greatest superiority of the Bolsheviks and the toughest bunkers! This path toward art is certainly a different one than the one many of you even today consider possible. It does not, however, stand in opposition to your experience that you had as soldiers and fighters, on the contrary, it is most closely tied to it.
Despite everything, you have it easier than the artists them-selves. They pave the path for you, they seek the steep trail and orient you. But you must walk it yourselves. That costs sweat and endurance.
On the highest peak of this path waves to you divine reward. It is certain for you, for it lies within you yourselves. One or the other has already gotten there “by coincidence”. When there was nothing else left, then he read the “heavy material” out of sheer desperation, first reluctantly, until he finally realized that – although one cannot devour classical poems or a novel by Kolbenheyer pages at a time – a single genuine poem can convey more energy and life joy than a whole stack of recreational literature. Whoever has realized that in a clear moment, should also consciously summon up enough hardness to make the highest values accessible to himself.
Then he will, like in the most dangerous moments of combat, in the most difficult hours of his struggle for the understanding of higher art as well, one day suddenly experience the moment, in which this effort becomes fertile and in which he succeeds in lifting treasures which he had not known until then and which he had unsuspectingly passed by.
via NS Europa
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-01-22--The Proud League of German Girls – Bund Deutscher Madel (BDM)

The League of German Girls or Band of German Maidens ( German : Bund Deutscher Mädel , abbreviated as BDM @ @ @ @ @ the Hitler Youth dedicated to German girls .

Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-01-22--These Contact Lenses Might Bring Humans One Step Closer To Becoming Cyborgs

A California-based tech startup called Mojo Vision has announced the development of an augmented reality contact lens that can allow the user to see a variety of different displays and graphics in their field of vision .
The concept is very similar to the previous “ Google Glass ” technology that came on the market a few years ago .
Google Glass was essentially a pair of augmented reality glasses , but the new contact lens is actually in your eye instead of on your face .
The currently-in-development AR lenses will use 14k pixels-per-inch micro-displays to show statistics like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reviews or directions .
To give some clarification , 14k pixels-per-inch would make it the smallest and densest dynamic display ever made .
“ We have figured out how to take that world ’ s most dense display .
We have a medical-grade contact lens , supply power , and data .
And eventually , we will get to the point where we ’ ve got all sorts of cool gadgets to show , ” Sinclair told UploadVR .
The lenses also contain wireless radio , image-recognition technology which is programmed to detect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ display does not turn on at inconvenient or unwanted times .
In a press release , Mojo Vision CEO Drew Perkins explained that “ after extensive research , development , and testing , we are excited to reveal our product plans and begin sharing details about this transformative platform .
Mojo has a vision for invisible computing where you have the information you want when you want it and are not bombarded or distracted by data when you don ’ t .
the technology should be helpful , and it should be available @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you want to focus on the world around you.
” Investors are very excited about the new project , raising over $ 108 million for additional funding .
The device has been in development for a very long time , as Mojo Vision has held patents for an augmented reality smart contact lens for over ten years .
John Vibes is an author and journalist who takes a special interest in the counter culture , and focuses solutions-oriented approaches to social problems .
He is also a host of The Free Your Mind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Read More stories by John Vibes

By John Vibes
A California-based tech startup called Mojo Vision has announced the development of an augmented reality contact lens that can allow the user to see a variety of different displays and graphics in their field of vision. The concept is very similar to the previous “Google Glass” technology that came on the market a few years ago. Google Glass was essentially a pair of augmented reality glasses, but the new contact lens is actually in your eye instead of on your face.
The currently-in-development AR lenses will use 14k pixels-per-inch micro-displays to show statistics like health tracking and other data like restaurant reviews or directions. To give some clarification, 14k pixels-per-inch would make it the smallest and densest dynamic display ever made.
“We have figured out how to take that world’s most dense display. We have a medical-grade contact lens, supply power, and data. And eventually, we will get to the point where we’ve got all sorts of cool gadgets to show,” Sinclair told UploadVR.
The lenses also contain wireless radio, image-recognition technology which is programmed to detect when it is needed, so the display does not turn on at inconvenient or unwanted times.
In a press release, Mojo Vision CEO Drew Perkins explained that “after extensive research, development, and testing, we are excited to reveal our product plans and begin sharing details about this transformative platform. Mojo has a vision for invisible computing where you have the information you want when you want it and are not bombarded or distracted by data when you don’t. the technology should be helpful, and it should be available in the moment and fade away when you want to focus on the world around you.”
Investors are very excited about the new project, raising over $108 million for additional funding. The device has been in development for a very long time, as Mojo Vision has held patents for an augmented reality smart contact lens for over ten years.
Image Credits: Lukas Gojda & Mojo Vision
Article source: Truth Theory
John Vibes is an author and journalist who takes a special interest in the counter culture, and focuses solutions-oriented approaches to social problems. He is also a host of The Free Your Mind Conference and The Free Thought Project Podcast. Read More stories by John Vibes
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-01-22--Observations on “Deep Ancestry” by Spencer Wells

Wells is ecstatic over what he calls wide variations WITHIN races which he alleges as being greater than variations BETWEEN races .
I understand that humans share most of their genes with plants , & humans share even more genes with chimpanzees , so the importance is not in the NUMBER of shared genes , but in the QUALITY of the genes we do not share , few as they may be .
Wells beats ZOG ’ s drum of “ One World ; One Mankind , ” on behalf of the Jew World Ordure : One-World Government .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but liars can twist them according to their a priori intentions .
My interpretation of Wells ’ statements is that we have sufficient diversity within races , so we do not require further diversity by mixing races .
Wells appears to deny racial existence in favor of eliminating the obvious differences with word-games .
So now , all humanoids supposedly belong to the “ same species.
” Were his standard applied to dogs , then all dogs would belong to the same species , also !
This is not science , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Lysenko ’ s anti-genetic genetics under “ Stalin.
” The Red Army was ordered to destroy all pure bred stock , human & animal , which they did , by rape & slaughter .
I read that they destroyed a studfarm ’ s horses in Prussia , & they wanted to destroy the Lippizaner horses in Vienna .
Apparently , Walt Disney made a movie about the rescue of those horses .
Wells points out the important effects which climate change has on human evolution & diversity .
As Elmer Pendell observed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when Nature is nasty , man improves .
When Nature is nice , man degenerates , for Problem-Makers outbreed Problem-Solvers .
In fact , Problem-Makers can proliferate BECAUSE of Problem-Solvers ’ successes .
The discovery of agriculture was the chief cause of over-population , so climate change may turn this “ cultural phenomenon ” into a trap for the surplus of world Problem-Makers .
Wells ’ findings indicate that evolution amongst humans is much faster than earlier findings indicated .
The mechanism of evolution ( a word which Wells avoids ) is mutation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ parlance ) + isolation + environment , such as ice ages or warming .
Other writers have noted the correlation with extreme climates & intelligence .
The dummies die off .
The smarties survive , if they are physically fit .
Human survival is based on man ’ s ability to adapt to changes , so we shall see how many & who survive the planet ’ s recurrent crises , along with the man-made ones .
Obviously , intelligence is in man ’ s DNA , although Wells has not found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politically kosher ’ in his disdain for skin color variations & other physical differences correlating with race ( a term which he also despises ) , although he admits that melanin is crucial in survival in strong sunlight , & its absence crucial in survival under weak sunlight , so what is important & distinctive of human evolution/adaptation to environment is ‘ unimportant.
’ He seems unaware of his contradictions , which may result from his consumption of multicultural recreational substances .
Before the jews took over human research , there was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which it was noted that culture & behavior correlated with physical/biological differences amongst ‘ humans.
’ Wells even points out that the Neanderthals were well-adapted to extreme cold , but not to their Cro-Magnon competitors , who made them extinct .
The Neanderthal was bigger , stronger , & even had a bigger brain , but the Cro-Magnon was smarter & faster .
End of Neanderthal Story .
Wells has taken on a big task of making modern genetics comprehensible to Goyim , albeit in kosher Jew World Ordure terms , but he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similarity versus diversity , in which he sees no conflict .
He hopes that his allegations of similarity , which reveal so much diversity amongst humans will serve to unite mankind , which is both nonsense & non sequitur .
The observable facts are that similarity generally produces competition for scarce resources .
The reason such a number of African fauna can coexist is due to their diversity , not their similarity .
The reason Black Africans produce deserts is their similarity .
It is logical that , if Blacks were the only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would become a desert , for all African deserts are said to be man-made , from over-logging , over-grazing & over-population .
I witnessed desert-creation when I was there .
Human diversity includes mental & behavioral diversity , which create conflicts in shared livingspace , as is evident by the growing U.S. prison population , for example .
To ignore such diversity is folly , as is evident in today ’ s multicultural societies .
Wells has therefore conferred knowledge without understanding .
Nice try , but no cigar .
ORION !

By E. Thomson
Wells is ecstatic over what he calls wide variations WITHIN races which he alleges as being greater than variations BETWEEN races. I understand that humans share most of their genes with plants, & humans share even more genes with chimpanzees, so the importance is not in the NUMBER of shared genes, but in the QUALITY of the genes we do not share, few as they may be. Wells beats ZOG’s drum of “One World; One Mankind,” on behalf of the Jew World Ordure: One-World Government. It appears that DNA data do not lie, but liars can twist them according to their a priori intentions.
My interpretation of Wells’ statements is that we have sufficient diversity within races, so we do not require further diversity by mixing races. Wells appears to deny racial existence in favor of eliminating the obvious differences with word-games. So now, all humanoids supposedly belong to the “same species.” Were his standard applied to dogs, then all dogs would belong to the same species, also! This is not science, but “politically correct” idiocy, similar to Lysenko’s anti-genetic genetics under “Stalin.” The Red Army was ordered to destroy all pure bred stock, human & animal, which they did, by rape & slaughter. I read that they destroyed a studfarm’s horses in Prussia, & they wanted to destroy the Lippizaner horses in Vienna. Apparently, Walt Disney made a movie about the rescue of those horses.
Wells points out the important effects which climate change has on human evolution & diversity. As Elmer Pendell observed in “Sex versus Civilization,” when Nature is nasty, man improves. When Nature is nice, man degenerates, for Problem-Makers outbreed Problem-Solvers. In fact, Problem-Makers can proliferate BECAUSE of Problem-Solvers’ successes. The discovery of agriculture was the chief cause of over-population, so climate change may turn this “cultural phenomenon” into a trap for the surplus of world Problem-Makers.
Wells’ findings indicate that evolution amongst humans is much faster than earlier findings indicated. The mechanism of evolution (a word which Wells avoids) is mutation (“genetic drift” in Wells’ parlance) + isolation + environment, such as ice ages or warming. Other writers have noted the correlation with extreme climates & intelligence. The dummies die off. The smarties survive, if they are physically fit. Human survival is based on man’s ability to adapt to changes, so we shall see how many & who survive the planet’s recurrent crises, along with the man-made ones. Obviously, intelligence is in man’s DNA, although Wells has not found it, yet.
Wells is ‘politically kosher’ in his disdain for skin color variations & other physical differences correlating with race (a term which he also despises), although he admits that melanin is crucial in survival in strong sunlight, & its absence crucial in survival under weak sunlight, so what is important & distinctive of human evolution/adaptation to environment is ‘unimportant.’ He seems unaware of his contradictions, which may result from his consumption of multicultural recreational substances.
Before the jews took over human research, there was a field known as Physical Anthropology, in which it was noted that culture & behavior correlated with physical/biological differences amongst ‘humans.’ Wells even points out that the Neanderthals were well-adapted to extreme cold, but not to their Cro-Magnon competitors, who made them extinct. The Neanderthal was bigger, stronger, & even had a bigger brain, but the Cro-Magnon was smarter & faster. End of Neanderthal Story.
Wells has taken on a big task of making modern genetics comprehensible to Goyim, albeit in kosher Jew World Ordure terms, but he trips over his contradictions, such as similarity versus diversity, in which he sees no conflict. He hopes that his allegations of similarity, which reveal so much diversity amongst humans will serve to unite mankind, which is both nonsense & non sequitur.
The observable facts are that similarity generally produces competition for scarce resources. The reason such a number of African fauna can coexist is due to their diversity, not their similarity. The reason Black Africans produce deserts is their similarity. It is logical that, if Blacks were the only species in Africa, the entire continent would become a desert, for all African deserts are said to be man-made, from over-logging, over-grazing & over-population. I witnessed desert-creation when I was there.
Human diversity includes mental & behavioral diversity, which create conflicts in shared livingspace, as is evident by the growing U.S. prison population, for example. To ignore such diversity is folly, as is evident in today’s multicultural societies. Wells has therefore conferred knowledge without understanding. Nice try, but no cigar. ORION!
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-01-22--Toxic Chemicals Are Stealing Millions of IQ Points From Kids in the US, New Study Shows

The latest research out of New York University ’ s ( NYU ) Grossman School of Medicine is anything but encouraging .
A total of 162 million IQ points have been lost and 738,000 cases of intellectual disability gained in the United States thanks to exposure to flame retardants alone .
But the study published January 14 in the journal Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology didn ’ t stop there .
Researchers looked at the effects of exposure to toxins like lead , mercury , pesticides , and polybrominated diphenyl ethers ( flame retardants ) among children between 2001 and 2016 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 78 million IQ points among U.S. children , pesticides accounted for a loss of 27 million points , and mercury came in last with a loss of 2.5 million IQ points .
Leo Trasande , a pediatrician and public health researcher at NYU said : Most of the children negatively affected by these toxins were likely exposed in utero via common household objects , potentially setting them up for a lifetime of difficulties before having even been born .
Despite a parent or pregnant mother ’ s best efforts flame retardants , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their way into the body .
Flame retardants are found on a host of furniture items , electronics , and children ’ s clothing .
Pesticides can be found on fresh produce and in food bought at a store or restaurant that was prepared with conventional produce .
Lead can be found in many older homes but is still used today in commercial paint , including that used on children ’ s playground equipment .
The latest research takes the damaging and irreversible effects of these toxins a step further and looks at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem and the results are grim .
The effects of such pervasive childhood brain damage has cost the U.S. economy trillions of dollars .
According to the researchers , one IQ point is worth roughly two percent of a person ’ s lifetime economic productivity .
Trasande explained : If a child ’ s eventual lifetime productive is $ 1 million one lost IQ point would equal $ 20,000 .
That ’ s a lot .
Trasande estimates that when all is said and done , the lost IQ points from 2001 to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amounts to a loss of $ 6 trillion in the U.S. economy .
And that ’ s just the hit to economic productivity—it doesn ’ t factor in any extra care or social services children and adults may require from the brain damage caused by exposure to these select toxins .
While the use of some of these toxins were reduced and addressed years ago we ’ re still seeing their effects .
Pesticides remain a constant problem despite the EPA having panned 37 thus far .
Some states have restricted the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but the gravity of this study proves there hasn ’ t been nearly enough action .
If more time , money , and energy continues to be put into how to manufacture and grow things rather than into how those things affect humans we will continue to see negative effects such as this .
And this latest study just goes to show how multi-faceted the problem really is .
The study did however include one silver lining .
The overall loss of IQ appears to be on the decline .

Emma Fiala, The Mind Unleashed
The latest research out of New York University’s (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine is anything but encouraging.
A total of 162 million IQ points have been lost and 738,000 cases of intellectual disability gained in the United States thanks to exposure to flame retardants alone.
But the study published January 14 in the journal Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology didn’t stop there. Researchers looked at the effects of exposure to toxins like lead, mercury, pesticides, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (flame retardants) among children between 2001 and 2016.
Lead exposure resulted in a loss of 78 million IQ points among U.S. children, pesticides accounted for a loss of 27 million points, and mercury came in last with a loss of 2.5 million IQ points.
Leo Trasande, a pediatrician and public health researcher at NYU said:
Kids’ brain development is exquisitely vulnerable. If you disrupt, even with subtle effects, the way a child’s brain is wired, [it] can have permanent and lifelong consequences.“
Most of the children negatively affected by these toxins were likely exposed in utero via common household objects, potentially setting them up for a lifetime of difficulties before having even been born.
Despite a parent or pregnant mother’s best efforts flame retardants, pesticides, and more can still find their way into the body. Flame retardants are found on a host of furniture items, electronics, and children’s clothing. Pesticides can be found on fresh produce and in food bought at a store or restaurant that was prepared with conventional produce. Lead can be found in many older homes but is still used today in commercial paint, including that used on children’s playground equipment.
The latest research takes the damaging and irreversible effects of these toxins a step further and looks at the economic impact of such a widespread problem and the results are grim. The effects of such pervasive childhood brain damage has cost the U.S. economy trillions of dollars.
According to the researchers, one IQ point is worth roughly two percent of a person’s lifetime economic productivity. Trasande explained:
If a child comes back from school with one less IQ point, maybe mum or the parent might not notice. But if 100,000 children come back with one less IQ point, the entire economy notices.“
If a child’s eventual lifetime productive is $1 million one lost IQ point would equal $20,000. That’s a lot.
Trasande estimates that when all is said and done, the lost IQ points from 2001 to 2016 due to the toxins mentioned above amounts to a loss of $6 trillion in the U.S. economy. And that’s just the hit to economic productivity—it doesn’t factor in any extra care or social services children and adults may require from the brain damage caused by exposure to these select toxins.
While the use of some of these toxins were reduced and addressed years ago we’re still seeing their effects. Pesticides remain a constant problem despite the EPA having panned 37 thus far. Some states have restricted the use of certain flame retardants on certain applications but the gravity of this study proves there hasn’t been nearly enough action.
If more time, money, and energy continues to be put into how to manufacture and grow things rather than into how those things affect humans we will continue to see negative effects such as this. And this latest study just goes to show how multi-faceted the problem really is.
The study did however include one silver lining. The overall loss of IQ appears to be on the decline.
NYU Grossman School of Medicine researchers found that IQ loss from the toxic chemicals analyzed in their study dropped from 27 million IQ points in 2001 and 2002 to 9 million IQ points in 2015 and 2016.“
By Emma Fiala | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-01-22--A New Definition of Warfare

A New Definition of Warfare

Supporters of Donald Trump often make the point that he has not started any new wars .
One might observe that it has not been for lack of trying , as his cruise missile attacks on Syria based on fabricated evidence and his recent assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani have been indisputably acts of war .
Trump also has enhanced troop levels both in the Middle East and in Afghanistan while also increasing the frequency and lethality of armed drone attacks worldwide .
Congress has been somewhat unseriously toying around with a tightening of the war powers act of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a president to carry out acts of war without any deliberation by or authorization from the legislature .
But perhaps the definition of war itself should be expanded .
The one area where Trump and his team of narcissistic sociopaths have been most active has been in the imposition of sanctions with lethal intent .
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has been explicit in his explanations that the assertion of “ extreme pressure ” on countries like Iran and Venezuela is intended to make the people suffer to such an extent that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about “ regime change.
” In Pompeo ’ s twisted reckoning that is how places that Washington disapproves of will again become “ normal countries.
” The sanctions can kill .
Those imposed by the United States are backed up by the U.S. Treasury which is able to block cash transfers going through the dollar denominated international banking system .
Banks that do not comply with America ’ s imposed rules can themselves be sanctioned , meaning that U.S. sanctions are de facto globally applicable , even if foreign banks and governments do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them .
It is well documented how sanctions that have an impact on the importation of medicines have killed thousands of Iranians .
In Venezuela , the effect of sanctions has been starvation as food imports have been blocked , forcing a large part of the population to flee the country just to survive .
The latest exercise of United States economic warfare has been directed against Iraq .
In the space of one week from December 29th to January 3rd , the American military , which operates out of two major bases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who were part of the Popular Mobilization Units of the Iraqi Army .
The militiamen had most recently been engaged in the successful fight against ISIS .
It followed up on that attack by killing Soleimani , Iraqi militia general Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis , and eight other Iraqis in a drone strike near Baghdad International Airport .
As the attacks were not approved in any way by the Iraqi government , it was no surprise that rioting followed and the Iraqi Parliament voted to remove all foreign troops from its soil .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi , based on the fact that the U.S. military was in Iraq at the invitation of the country ’ s government and that invitation had just been revoked by parliament .
That Iraq is to say the least unstable is attributable to the ill-advised U.S. invasion of 2003 .
The persistence of U.S. forces in the country is ostensibly to aid in the fight against ISIS , but the real reason is to serve as a check on Iranian influence in Iraq , which is a strategic demand made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actual American interest .
Indeed , the Iraqi government is probably closer politically to Tehran than to Washington , though the neocon line that the country is dominated by the Iranians is far from true .
Washington ’ s response to the legitimate Iraqi demand that its troops should be removed consisted of threats .
When Prime Minister Mahdi spoke with Pompeo on the phone and asked for discussions and a time table to create a “ withdrawal mechanism ” the Secretary of State made it clear that there would be no negotiations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The U.S .
Continued Partnership with Iraq ” asserted that American troops are in Iraq to serve as a “ force for good ” in the Middle East and that it is “ our right ” to maintain “ appropriate force posture ” in the region .
The Iraqi position also immediately produced presidential threats and tweets about “ sanctions like they have never seen , ” with the implication that the U.S. was more than willing to wreck the Iraqi economy if it did not get its way .
The latest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to its New York federal reserve bank account , where international oil sale revenue is kept , creating a devastating cash crunch in Iraq ’ s financial system that might indeed destroy the Iraqi economy .
If taking steps to ruin a country economically is not considered warfare by other means it is difficult to discern what might fit that description .
After dealing with Iraq , the Trump Administration turned its guns on one of its oldest and closest allies .
Great Britain , like most of the other European signatories to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( JCPOA ) has been reluctant to withdraw from the agreement over concern that Iran will as a result decide to develop nuclear weapons .
According to the Guardian , a United States representative from the National Security Council named Richard Goldberg , had visited London recently to make clear to the British government that if it does not follow the American lead and withdraw from the JCPOA and reapply sanctions it just might be difficult to work out a trade agreement with Washington post-Brexit .
It is a significant threat as part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from a Trump pledge to make up for some of the anticipated decline in European trade by increasing U.K. access to the U.S. market .
Now the quid pro quo is clear : Britain , which normally does in fact follow the Washington lead in foreign policy , will now be expected to be completely on board all of the time and everywhere , particularly in the Middle East .
During his visit , Goldberg told the BBC : “ The question for prime minister Johnson is : ‘ As you are moving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do post-31 January as you come to Washington to negotiate a free-trade agreement with the United States ?
’ It ’ s absolutely in [ your ] interests and the people of Great Britain ’ s interests to join with President Trump , with the United States , to realign your foreign policy away from Brussels , and to join the maximum pressure campaign to keep all of us safe.
” And there is an interesting back story on Richard Goldberg , a John Bolton protégé anti-Iran hardliner , who threatened the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carden , writing at The Nation , posits “ Consider the following scenario : A Washington , DC–based , tax-exempt organization that bills itself as a think tank dedicated to the enhancement of a foreign country ’ s reputation within the United States , funded by billionaires closely aligned with said foreign country , has one of its high-ranking operatives ( often referred to as ‘ fellows ’ ) embedded within the White House national security staff in order to further the oft-stated agenda of his home organization , which , as it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during his year-long stint there .
As it happens , this is exactly what the pro-Israel think tank the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies ( FDD ) reportedly achieved in an arrangement brokered by former Trump national security adviser John Bolton.
” The FDD senior adviser in question , who was placed on the National Security Council , was Richard Goldberg .
FDD is largely funded by Jewish American billionaires including vulture fund capitalist Paul Singer and Home Depot partner Bernard Marcus .
Its officers meet regularly with Israeli government officials and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unrelenting effort to bring about war with Iran .
It has relentlessly pushed for a recklessly militaristic U.S. policy directed against Iran and also more generally in the Middle East .
It is a reliable mouthpiece for Israel and , inevitably , it has never been required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 .
To be sure , Trump also has other neocons advising him on Iran , including David Wurmser , another Bolton associate , who has the president ’ s ear and is a consultant to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ submitted a series of memos to the White House advocating a policy of “ regime disruption ” with the Islamic Republic that will destabilize it and eventually lead to a change of government .
He may have played a key role in giving the green light to the assassination of Soleimani .
The good news , if there is any , is that Goldberg resigned on January 3rd , allegedly because the war against Iran was not developing fast enough to suit him and FDD , but he is symptomatic of the many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Administration at secondary and tertiary levels , where much of the development and implementation of policy actually takes place .
It also explains that when it comes to Iran and the irrational continuation of a significant U.S. military presence in the Middle East , it is Israel and its Lobby that are steering the ship of state .
Philip M. Giraldi , Ph.D. , is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest , a 501 ( c ) 3 tax deductible educational foundation ( Federal ID Number # 52-1739023 ) that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Middle East .
Website is councilforthenationalinterest.org , address is P.O .
Box 2157 , Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform @ cnionline.org .
This article originally appeared on The Unz Review .

Supporters of Donald Trump often make the point that he has not started any new wars. One might observe that it has not been for lack of trying, as his cruise missile attacks on Syria based on fabricated evidence and his recent assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani have been indisputably acts of war. Trump also has enhanced troop levels both in the Middle East and in Afghanistan while also increasing the frequency and lethality of armed drone attacks worldwide.
Congress has been somewhat unseriously toying around with a tightening of the war powers act of 1973 to make it more difficult for a president to carry out acts of war without any deliberation by or authorization from the legislature. But perhaps the definition of war itself should be expanded. The one area where Trump and his team of narcissistic sociopaths have been most active has been in the imposition of sanctions with lethal intent. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has been explicit in his explanations that the assertion of “extreme pressure” on countries like Iran and Venezuela is intended to make the people suffer to such an extent that they rise up against their governments and bring about “regime change.” In Pompeo’s twisted reckoning that is how places that Washington disapproves of will again become “normal countries.”
The sanctions can kill. Those imposed by the United States are backed up by the U.S. Treasury which is able to block cash transfers going through the dollar denominated international banking system. Banks that do not comply with America’s imposed rules can themselves be sanctioned, meaning that U.S. sanctions are de facto globally applicable, even if foreign banks and governments do not agree with the policies that drive them. It is well documented how sanctions that have an impact on the importation of medicines have killed thousands of Iranians. In Venezuela, the effect of sanctions has been starvation as food imports have been blocked, forcing a large part of the population to flee the country just to survive.
The latest exercise of United States economic warfare has been directed against Iraq. In the space of one week from December 29th to January 3rd, the American military, which operates out of two major bases in Iraq, killed 25 Iraqi militiamen who were part of the Popular Mobilization Units of the Iraqi Army. The militiamen had most recently been engaged in the successful fight against ISIS. It followed up on that attack by killing Soleimani, Iraqi militia general Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, and eight other Iraqis in a drone strike near Baghdad International Airport. As the attacks were not approved in any way by the Iraqi government, it was no surprise that rioting followed and the Iraqi Parliament voted to remove all foreign troops from its soil. The decree was signed off on by Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi, based on the fact that the U.S. military was in Iraq at the invitation of the country’s government and that invitation had just been revoked by parliament.
That Iraq is to say the least unstable is attributable to the ill-advised U.S. invasion of 2003. The persistence of U.S. forces in the country is ostensibly to aid in the fight against ISIS, but the real reason is to serve as a check on Iranian influence in Iraq, which is a strategic demand made by Israel and not responsive to any actual American interest. Indeed, the Iraqi government is probably closer politically to Tehran than to Washington, though the neocon line that the country is dominated by the Iranians is far from true.
Washington’s response to the legitimate Iraqi demand that its troops should be removed consisted of threats. When Prime Minister Mahdi spoke with Pompeo on the phone and asked for discussions and a time table to create a “withdrawal mechanism” the Secretary of State made it clear that there would be no negotiations. A State Department written response entitled “The U.S. Continued Partnership with Iraq” asserted that American troops are in Iraq to serve as a “force for good” in the Middle East and that it is “our right” to maintain “appropriate force posture” in the region.
The Iraqi position also immediately produced presidential threats and tweets about “sanctions like they have never seen,” with the implication that the U.S. was more than willing to wreck the Iraqi economy if it did not get its way. The latest threat to emerge involves blocking Iraq access to its New York federal reserve bank account, where international oil sale revenue is kept, creating a devastating cash crunch in Iraq’s financial system that might indeed destroy the Iraqi economy. If taking steps to ruin a country economically is not considered warfare by other means it is difficult to discern what might fit that description.
After dealing with Iraq, the Trump Administration turned its guns on one of its oldest and closest allies. Great Britain, like most of the other European signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has been reluctant to withdraw from the agreement over concern that Iran will as a result decide to develop nuclear weapons. According to the Guardian, a United States representative from the National Security Council named Richard Goldberg, had visited London recently to make clear to the British government that if it does not follow the American lead and withdraw from the JCPOA and reapply sanctions it just might be difficult to work out a trade agreement with Washington post-Brexit. It is a significant threat as part of the pro-Brexit vote clearly was derived from a Trump pledge to make up for some of the anticipated decline in European trade by increasing U.K. access to the U.S. market. Now the quid pro quo is clear: Britain, which normally does in fact follow the Washington lead in foreign policy, will now be expected to be completely on board all of the time and everywhere, particularly in the Middle East.
During his visit, Goldberg told the BBC: “The question for prime minister Johnson is: ‘As you are moving towards Brexit … what are you going to do post-31 January as you come to Washington to negotiate a free-trade agreement with the United States?’ It’s absolutely in [your] interests and the people of Great Britain’s interests to join with President Trump, with the United States, to realign your foreign policy away from Brussels, and to join the maximum pressure campaign to keep all of us safe.”
And there is an interesting back story on Richard Goldberg, a John Bolton protégé anti-Iran hardliner, who threatened the British on behalf of Trump. James Carden, writing at The Nation, posits “Consider the following scenario: A Washington, DC–based, tax-exempt organization that bills itself as a think tank dedicated to the enhancement of a foreign country’s reputation within the United States, funded by billionaires closely aligned with said foreign country, has one of its high-ranking operatives (often referred to as ‘fellows’) embedded within the White House national security staff in order to further the oft-stated agenda of his home organization, which, as it happens, is also paying his salary during his year-long stint there. As it happens, this is exactly what the pro-Israel think tank the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD) reportedly achieved in an arrangement brokered by former Trump national security adviser John Bolton.”
The FDD senior adviser in question, who was placed on the National Security Council, was Richard Goldberg. FDD is largely funded by Jewish American billionaires including vulture fund capitalist Paul Singer and Home Depot partner Bernard Marcus. Its officers meet regularly with Israeli government officials and the organization is best known for its unrelenting effort to bring about war with Iran. It has relentlessly pushed for a recklessly militaristic U.S. policy directed against Iran and also more generally in the Middle East. It is a reliable mouthpiece for Israel and, inevitably, it has never been required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938.
To be sure, Trump also has other neocons advising him on Iran, including David Wurmser, another Bolton associate, who has the president’s ear and is a consultant to the National Security Council. Wurmser has recently submitted a series of memos to the White House advocating a policy of “regime disruption” with the Islamic Republic that will destabilize it and eventually lead to a change of government. He may have played a key role in giving the green light to the assassination of Soleimani.
The good news, if there is any, is that Goldberg resigned on January 3rd, allegedly because the war against Iran was not developing fast enough to suit him and FDD, but he is symptomatic of the many neoconservative hawks who have infiltrated the Trump Administration at secondary and tertiary levels, where much of the development and implementation of policy actually takes place. It also explains that when it comes to Iran and the irrational continuation of a significant U.S. military presence in the Middle East, it is Israel and its Lobby that are steering the ship of state.
Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform@cnionline.org.
This article originally appeared on The Unz Review.


renegadetribune--2020-01-23--White Children Groomed, Branded, and Sold For Sex By Gangs In Florida

PASCO COUNTY , Fla. — Human trafficking victims are being branded and sold for sex in the Tampa Bay area @ @ @ @ @ found .
Those working with victims told I-Team Investigator Kylie McGivern those permanent markings can @ @ @ @ @ even after they are rescued .
The victims are all young white girls , some @ @ @ @ @ 10 men one after each other every day .
“ It ’ s like branding @ @ @ @ @ .
Alan Wilkett , who leads Pasco County ’ s human trafficking task force .
@ @ @ @ @ ownership mark .
Branding is when somebody — a pimp or a trafficker — will @ @ @ @ @ symbol or his sign on his victims through some sort of tattoo .
”

PASCO COUNTY, Fla. — Human trafficking victims are being branded and sold for sex in the Tampa Bay area, ABC’s I-Team found.
Those working with victims told I-Team Investigator Kylie McGivern those permanent markings can often remain with trafficking victims even after they are rescued. The victims are all young white girls, some being raped by more than 10 men one after each other every day.
“It’s like branding cattle,” said Cpl. Alan Wilkett, who leads Pasco County’s human trafficking task force. “It’s an ownership mark. Branding is when somebody — a pimp or a trafficker — will put his mark or his symbol or his sign on his victims through some sort of tattoo.”
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt