renegadetribune--2020-11-18--Israel’s Power Is Unlimited

Israel’s Power Is Unlimited

Even though there was virtually no debate on foreign policy during the recent presidential campaign , there has been considerable discussion of what President Joe Biden ’ s national security team might look like .
The general consensus is that the top levels of the government will be largely drawn from officials who previously served in the Obama administration and who are likely to be hawkish .
There has also been , inevitably , some discussion of how the new administration , if it is confirmed , will deal with Israel and the Middle East in general .
Israelis would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as they clearly understand that he was and still is willing to defer to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on nearly all issues .
Indeed , that process is ongoing even though Trump might only have about nine more weeks remaining in office .
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is reportedly preparing to sanction several international human rights organizations as anti-Semitic due to the fact that they criticize Israel ’ s brutality on the West Bank and its illegal settlement policies .
The White House is also prepared to free convicted but paroled Israeli @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he can move to Israel , where he is regarded as a hero .
Pollard was the most damaging spy in U.S. history and any mitigation of his sentence has been opposed by both the Pentagon , where he worked , and also by the intelligence community .
Finally , it is widely believed that before the end of the year Trump will declare that the United States accepts the legitimacy of Israeli intentions to declare annexation of nearly all the Palestinian West Bank .
The White House will actually encourage such an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Israel and the Biden administration.
” One should note that none of the pro-Israeli measures that are likely to come out of the White House enhance U.S. security in any way and they also do nothing particularly to benefit Trump ’ s campaign to be re-elected through legal challenges .
If Biden does succeed in becoming president , the special place that Israel occupies in the centers of American power are unlikely to be disturbed , which is why Netanyahu was quick off the mark in congratulating the possible new chief executive .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a “ Zionist ” and his running mate Kamala Harris has been a featured speaker at the annual gatherings of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee ( AIPAC ) in Washington .
Both are strongly supportive of the “ special relationship ” with the Israel and will make no effort to compromise America ’ s apparent commitment to protect and nourish the Jewish state .
Though Israel is central to how the United States conducts its foreign policy , the country was invisible in the debates and other discussions that took place among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voters were therefore given the choice of one government that panders to Israel at the expense of U.S. security or another party that does exactly the same thing .
To be sure , Biden did state that he would work to reinstate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ( JCPOA ) relating to Iran ’ s nuclear program , which was canceled by Trump .
But he also indicated that it would require some amendment , meaning that the Iranians would have to include their missile program in the monitoring while also abandoning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Middle East region .
The Iranian government has already indicated that additional conditions are unacceptable , so the deal is dead in the water .
Israel has also privately and publicly objected to any new arrangement and has already declared that it would “ save the option ” of working through the Republican Senate to thwart any attempts by the Biden Administration to change things .
That Israel would blatantly and openly interfere in the deliberations of Congress raises some serious questions which the mainstream media predictably is not addressing .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and it is something that some Jews are not shy about discussing among themselves .
Jewish power is unique in terms of how it functions .
If you ’ re an American ( or British ) politician , you very quickly are made to appreciate that Israel owns you and nearly all of your colleagues .
Indeed , the process begins in the U.S. even before your election when the little man from AIPAC shows up with the check list that he wants you to sign off on .
If you behave per @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and you will benefit from your understanding that everything happening in Washington that is remotely connected to the interests of the state of Israel is to be determined by the Jewish state alone , not by the U.S. Congress or White House .
And , here is the tricky part , even while you are energetically kowtowing to Netanyahu , you must strenuously deny that there is Jewish power at work if anyone ever asks you about it .
You behave in that fashion because you know that your pleasant life will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fail to deny the existence of an Israel Lobby or the Jewish power that supports it .
It is a bold assertion , but there is plenty of evidence to support how that power is exerted and what the consequences are .
Senators William Fulbright and Chuck Percy and Congressmen Paul Findlay , Pete McCloskey and Cynthia McKinney have all experienced the wrath of the Lobby and voted out of office .
Currently Reverend Raphael Warnock , who is running against Georgia Loeffler for a senate seat in Georgia demonstrates exactly how candidates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the Israel Lobby .
Warnock was a strong supporter of Palestinian rights and a critic of Israeli brutality .
He said as recently as 2018 that the Israelis were shooting civilians and condemned the military occupation and settlement construction on the Palestinian West Bank , which he compared to apartheid South Africa .
Now that he is running for the Senate , he is saying that he is opposed to the Boycotts , Divestment and Sanctions ( BDS ) movement due to what he calls the movement ’ s “ anti-Semitic overtones.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Israel and believes that Iran is in pursuit of a nuclear weapon , both of which are critical issues being promoted by the Zionist lobby .
There is some pushback in Washington to Israeli dominance , but not much .
Recent senior Pentagon appointee Colonel Douglas Macgregor famously has pointed out that many American politicians get “ very , very rich ” through their support of Israel even though it means the United States being dragged into new wars .
Just how Israel gains control of the U.S. political process is illustrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Obama Administration ’ s feeble attempts to do the right thing in the Middle East were derailed by American Jews in Congress , the media , party donors and from inside the White House itself .
The story is of particularly interest as the Biden Administration will no doubt suffer the same fate if it seeks to reject or challenge Israel ’ s ability to manipulate and virtually control key aspects of U.S. foreign policy .
The account of Barack Obama ’ s struggle with Israel and the Israeli Lobby comes from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes .
It is entitled The World As It Is , and it is extremely candid about how Jewish power was able to limit the foreign policy options of a popular sitting president .
Rhodes recounts , for example , how Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel once nicknamed him “ Hamas ” after he dared to speak up for Palestinian human rights , angrily shouting at him “ Hamas over here is going to make it impossible for my kid to have his fucking bar mitzvah in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama was forced to back down when confronted by Israel and its supporters in the U.S. as well as within the Democratic Party .
On several occasions , Netanyahu lecture the U.S. president as if he were an errant schoolboy .
And Obama just had to take it .
Rhodes sums up the situation as follows : “ In Washington , where support for Israel is an imperative for members of Congress , there was a natural deference to the views of the Israeli government on issues related to Iran , and Netanyahu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an Israeli Churchill… .
AIPAC and other organizations exist to make sure that the views of the Israeli government are effectively disseminated and opposing views discredited in Washington , and this dynamic was a permanent part of the landscape of the Obama presidency.
” And , returning to the persistent denial of Jewish power even existing when it is running full speed and relentlessly , Rhodes notes the essential dishonesty of the Israel Lobby as it operates in Washington : “ Even to acknowledge the fact that AIPAC was spending tens of millions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] was anti-Semitic .
To observe that the same people who supported the war in Iraq also opposed the Iran deal was similarly off limits .
It was an offensive way for people to avoid accountability for their own positions.
” Many Americans long to live in a country that is at peace with the world and respectful of the sovereignty of foreign nations .
Alas , as long as Israeli interests driven by overwhelming Jewish power in the United States continue to corrupt our institutions that just will not be possible .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ including Jews , to accept that Israel is a foreign country that must make its own decisions and thereby suffer the consequences .
The United States does not exist to bail Israel out or to provide cover for its bad behavior .
The so-called “ special relationship ” must end and the U.S. must deal with the Israelis as they would with any other country based on America ’ s own self-interests .
Those interests definitely do not include funding the Israeli war machine , assassinating foreign leaders , or attacking a non-threatening @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Syria .
Philip M. Giraldi , Ph.D. , is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest , a 501 ( c ) 3 tax deductible educational foundation ( Federal ID Number # 52-1739023 ) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East .
Website is https : //councilforthenationalinterest.org , address is P.O .
Box 2157 , Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform @ cnionline.org .

Even though there was virtually no debate on foreign policy during the recent presidential campaign, there has been considerable discussion of what President Joe Biden’s national security team might look like. The general consensus is that the top levels of the government will be largely drawn from officials who previously served in the Obama administration and who are likely to be hawkish. There has also been, inevitably, some discussion of how the new administration, if it is confirmed, will deal with Israel and the Middle East in general.
Israelis would have preferred a victory by Donald Trump as they clearly understand that he was and still is willing to defer to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on nearly all issues. Indeed, that process is ongoing even though Trump might only have about nine more weeks remaining in office. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is reportedly preparing to sanction several international human rights organizations as anti-Semitic due to the fact that they criticize Israel’s brutality on the West Bank and its illegal settlement policies. The White House is also prepared to free convicted but paroled Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard from travel restrictions so he can move to Israel, where he is regarded as a hero. Pollard was the most damaging spy in U.S. history and any mitigation of his sentence has been opposed by both the Pentagon, where he worked, and also by the intelligence community.
Finally, it is widely believed that before the end of the year Trump will declare that the United States accepts the legitimacy of Israeli intentions to declare annexation of nearly all the Palestinian West Bank. The White House will actually encourage such an initiative reportedly “to sow hostility between Israel and the Biden administration.” One should note that none of the pro-Israeli measures that are likely to come out of the White House enhance U.S. security in any way and they also do nothing particularly to benefit Trump’s campaign to be re-elected through legal challenges.
If Biden does succeed in becoming president, the special place that Israel occupies in the centers of American power are unlikely to be disturbed, which is why Netanyahu was quick off the mark in congratulating the possible new chief executive. Biden has proudly declared himself to be a “Zionist” and his running mate Kamala Harris has been a featured speaker at the annual gatherings of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Washington. Both are strongly supportive of the “special relationship” with the Israel and will make no effort to compromise America’s apparent commitment to protect and nourish the Jewish state.
Though Israel is central to how the United States conducts its foreign policy, the country was invisible in the debates and other discussions that took place among candidates during the recent campaign. American voters were therefore given the choice of one government that panders to Israel at the expense of U.S. security or another party that does exactly the same thing. To be sure, Biden did state that he would work to reinstate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) relating to Iran’s nuclear program, which was canceled by Trump. But he also indicated that it would require some amendment, meaning that the Iranians would have to include their missile program in the monitoring while also abandoning their alleged propensity to “interfere” in the Middle East region. The Iranian government has already indicated that additional conditions are unacceptable, so the deal is dead in the water. Israel has also privately and publicly objected to any new arrangement and has already declared that it would “save the option” of working through the Republican Senate to thwart any attempts by the Biden Administration to change things.
That Israel would blatantly and openly interfere in the deliberations of Congress raises some serious questions which the mainstream media predictably is not addressing. Jewish power in America is for real and it is something that some Jews are not shy about discussing among themselves. Jewish power is unique in terms of how it functions. If you’re an American (or British) politician, you very quickly are made to appreciate that Israel owns you and nearly all of your colleagues. Indeed, the process begins in the U.S. even before your election when the little man from AIPAC shows up with the check list that he wants you to sign off on. If you behave per instructions your career path will be smooth, and you will benefit from your understanding that everything happening in Washington that is remotely connected to the interests of the state of Israel is to be determined by the Jewish state alone, not by the U.S. Congress or White House.
And, here is the tricky part, even while you are energetically kowtowing to Netanyahu, you must strenuously deny that there is Jewish power at work if anyone ever asks you about it. You behave in that fashion because you know that your pleasant life will be destroyed, painfully, if you fail to deny the existence of an Israel Lobby or the Jewish power that supports it.
It is a bold assertion, but there is plenty of evidence to support how that power is exerted and what the consequences are. Senators William Fulbright and Chuck Percy and Congressmen Paul Findlay, Pete McCloskey and Cynthia McKinney have all experienced the wrath of the Lobby and voted out of office. Currently Reverend Raphael Warnock, who is running against Georgia Loeffler for a senate seat in Georgia demonstrates exactly how candidates are convinced to stand on their heads by the Israel Lobby. Warnock was a strong supporter of Palestinian rights and a critic of Israeli brutality. He said as recently as 2018 that the Israelis were shooting civilians and condemned the military occupation and settlement construction on the Palestinian West Bank, which he compared to apartheid South Africa. Now that he is running for the Senate, he is saying that he is opposed to the Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement due to what he calls the movement’s “anti-Semitic overtones.” He also supports continued military assistance for Israel and believes that Iran is in pursuit of a nuclear weapon, both of which are critical issues being promoted by the Zionist lobby.
There is some pushback in Washington to Israeli dominance, but not much. Recent senior Pentagon appointee Colonel Douglas Macgregor famously has pointed out that many American politicians get “very, very rich” through their support of Israel even though it means the United States being dragged into new wars. Just how Israel gains control of the U.S. political process is illustrated by the devastating insider tale of how the Obama Administration’s feeble attempts to do the right thing in the Middle East were derailed by American Jews in Congress, the media, party donors and from inside the White House itself. The story is of particularly interest as the Biden Administration will no doubt suffer the same fate if it seeks to reject or challenge Israel’s ability to manipulate and virtually control key aspects of U.S. foreign policy.
The account of Barack Obama’s struggle with Israel and the Israeli Lobby comes from a recently published memoir written by a former foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes. It is entitled The World As It Is, and it is extremely candid about how Jewish power was able to limit the foreign policy options of a popular sitting president. Rhodes recounts, for example, how Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel once nicknamed him “Hamas” after he dared to speak up for Palestinian human rights, angrily shouting at him “Hamas over here is going to make it impossible for my kid to have his fucking bar mitzvah in Israel.”
Rhodes cites numerous instances where Obama was forced to back down when confronted by Israel and its supporters in the U.S. as well as within the Democratic Party. On several occasions, Netanyahu lecture the U.S. president as if he were an errant schoolboy. And Obama just had to take it. Rhodes sums up the situation as follows: “In Washington, where support for Israel is an imperative for members of Congress, there was a natural deference to the views of the Israeli government on issues related to Iran, and Netanyahu was unfailingly confrontational, casting himself as an Israeli Churchill…. AIPAC and other organizations exist to make sure that the views of the Israeli government are effectively disseminated and opposing views discredited in Washington, and this dynamic was a permanent part of the landscape of the Obama presidency.”
And, returning to the persistent denial of Jewish power even existing when it is running full speed and relentlessly, Rhodes notes the essential dishonesty of the Israel Lobby as it operates in Washington: “Even to acknowledge the fact that AIPAC was spending tens of millions to defeat the Iran deal [JCPOA] was anti-Semitic. To observe that the same people who supported the war in Iraq also opposed the Iran deal was similarly off limits. It was an offensive way for people to avoid accountability for their own positions.”
Many Americans long to live in a country that is at peace with the world and respectful of the sovereignty of foreign nations. Alas, as long as Israeli interests driven by overwhelming Jewish power in the United States continue to corrupt our institutions that just will not be possible. It is time for all Americans, including Jews, to accept that Israel is a foreign country that must make its own decisions and thereby suffer the consequences. The United States does not exist to bail Israel out or to provide cover for its bad behavior. The so-called “special relationship” must end and the U.S. must deal with the Israelis as they would with any other country based on America’s own self-interests. Those interests definitely do not include funding the Israeli war machine, assassinating foreign leaders, or attacking a non-threatening Iran while continuing an illegal occupation of Syria.
Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is https://councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform@cnionline.org.


renegadetribune--2020-11-18--“Dark Winter” Predictive Programming in 2013 Video Game

Dark Winter has revealed how vulnerable we ’ ve become .
Our lifestyle , our security , our safety depends @ @ @ @ @ economy .
We ’ ve created a system so complicated that we no longer understand @ @ @ @ @ Oil , power , shipping , transport — we live in a complex world , @ @ @ @ @ gets , the more fragile it becomes .
The system is built on a global @ @ @ @ @ where they ’ re needed — just in time .
We ’ ve created a @ @ @ @ @ just one , and everything falls apart .
And what ’ s fueling this system @ @ @

Dark Winter has revealed how vulnerable we’ve become. Our lifestyle, our security, our safety depends on a delicate and unstable economy. We’ve created a system so complicated that we no longer understand how to control it. Oil, power, shipping, transport — we live in a complex world, and the more complex it gets, the more fragile it becomes. The system is built on a global supply chain that gets things where they’re needed — just in time. We’ve created a house of cards. Remove just one, and everything falls apart. And what’s fueling this system? Money.


renegadetribune--2020-11-18--Why Won’t Anyone Publish the Danish Mask Study?

A study of 6,000 Danes was set to reveal whether wearing a face mask actually reduces the risk of COVID-19 .
The only problem is leading medical journals are refusing to publish the data , and the study ’ s lead author hinted it ’ s because they ’ re not “ brave enough ” to do it Does a mask work ?
It ’ s a question recently posed by the Danish newspaper Berlingske , [ i ] and one that would seem to demand an answer from scientists and public health officials alike .
Yet , despite mask @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the District of Columbia , [ ii ] there ’ s shockingly little hard data about whether or not they slow the spread of infectious disease .
Researchers from Denmark wanted to change that , conducting what may be the only randomized trial [ iii ] to determine if masks actually protect against COVID-19 , [ iv ] but multiple medical journals have refused to publish the findings .
Thomas Benfield , a researcher at the University of Copenhagen and one of the study ’ s lead authors , [ v ] was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson published Benfield ’ s emailed response on Twitter , which is simply : “ As soon as a journal is brave enough … ” [ vi ] What Does the Danish Mask Study Reveal ?
Speaking to Nature in October 2020 , Benfield said his team wasn ’ t yet ready to share the study ’ s results .
[ vii ] In truth , three medical journals — The Lancet , the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , leading to speculation that it reveals a message that goes against the status quo .
Berlingske , which is the oldest daily newspaper in Denmark , suggests this is so , stating ( loosely translated ) , “ The researchers behind a large and unique Danish study on the effect of wearing a mask even have great difficulty in getting their research results published .
One of the participating professors in the study admits that the still secret research result can be perceived as ‘ controversial . '
” [ viii ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 6,000 participants who were randomly assigned to wear a face mask or not for a 30-day period .
Participants were confirmed to not have COVID-19 or symptoms of it at the start of the study , and they were required to spend more than three hours per day outside of the home with exposure to other people during the study period .
[ x ] Described as an “ outstanding sample , ” the Berlingske article , which was written by Lars Henrik Aagaard , praised the study , noting , “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world , and the purpose was once and for all to try to clarify the extent to which the use of masks in public space provides protection against corona infection.
” [ xi ] While the results were originally expected to be published in August 2020 , Benfield later said that his comment was taken “ a bit out of context ” and , “ The article is being reviewed by a respected journal .
We have decided not to publish data until the article has been accepted.
” [ xii ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s researchers , Christian Torp-Pedersen , a chief physician at North Zealand Hospital ’ s research department , who similarly said , “ We can not start discussing what they ( the medical journals ) are dissatisfied with because , in that case , we must also explain what the study showed , and we do not want to discuss that until it is published.
” [ xiii ] He then went on to say that he “ might also have dared to go as far as Benfield , ” had he been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been published , referring to his “ brave enough ” comment .
Aagaard asks , “ Does this mean that your research results may be perceived as controversial in the eyes of some ?
” to which Torp-Pedersen replies , “ That ’ s how I want to interpret it , too.
” Aagaard then states , “ Can one interpret a controversial research result in the sense that no significant effect of mask use is demonstrated in your study ?
” Torp-Pedersen says , “ I think that ’ s a very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ xiv ] Dr. Henning Bundgaard with Denmark ’ s Rigshospitalet is another of the study ’ s authors .
In speaking with Bloomberg in July 2020 — when he still expected the study ’ s results to become public the next month — he said , “ All these countries recommending face masks haven ’ t made their decisions based on new studies.
” [ xv ] Denmark was one of the latest countries to institute a mask mandate , which took effect October 29 , 2020 for all public indoor spaces .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Bundgaard told Bloomberg he worried mask mandates may offer a “ false sense of security ” and make people “ sloppy ” when following other guidelines like handwashing , self-isolating if you ’ re sick and social distancing .
Also revealing is Bloomberg ’ s last paragraph : Masks have become a contentious topic in the U.S. , dividing neighbors , colleagues and families over whether or not they slow the spread of infectious disease .
The controversy continues to grow , particularly since public health officials have been giving conflicting information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and solid data , such as what may be revealed via the Danish study , is sorely lacking .
[ iv ] ClinicalTrials.gov , Reduction in COVID-19 Infection Using Surgical Facial Masks Outside the Healthcare System https : //clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04337541

A study of 6,000 Danes was set to reveal whether wearing a face mask actually reduces the risk of COVID-19. The only problem is leading medical journals are refusing to publish the data.


Lucian on Mourning

THE behaviour of the average man in a time of bereavement , his own language and the remarks offered him by way of consolation , are things that will reward the attention of a curious observer .
The mourner takes it for granted that a terrible blow has fallen both upon himself and upon the object of his lamentations : yet for all he knows to the contrary ( and here I appeal to Pluto and Persephone ) the departed one , so far from being entitled to commiseration , may find himself in improved circumstances .
The feelings of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solely by custom and convention .
The procedure in such cases–but no : let me first state the popular beliefs on the subject of death itself ; we shall then understand the motives for the elaborate ceremonial with which it is attended .
The vulgar ( as philosophers call the generality of mankind ) , implicitly taking as their text-book the fictions of Homer and Hesiod and other poets , assume the existence of a deep subterranean hole called Hades ; spacious , murky , and sunless , but by some mysterious means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ visible .
Its king is a brother of Zeus , one Pluto ; whose name–so an able philologer assures me–contains a complimentary allusion to his ghostly wealth .
As to the nature of his government , and the condition of his subjects , the authority allotted to him extends over all the dead , who , from the moment that they come under his control , are kept in unbreakable fetters ; Shades are on no account permitted to return to Earth ; to this rule there have been only two or three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and these were made for very urgent reasons .
His realm is encompassed by vast rivers , whose very names inspire awe : Cocytus , Pyriphlegethon , and the like .
Most formidable of all , and first to arrest the progress of the new-comer , is Acheron , that lake which none may pass save by the ferryman ’ s boat ; it is too deep to be waded , too broad for the swimmer , and even defies the flight of birds deceased .
At the very beginning of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here Aeacus , a nephew of the king , stands on guard .
By his side is a three-headed dog , a grim brute ; to new arrivals , however , he is friendly enough , reserving his bark , and the yawning horror of his jaws , for the would-be runaway .
On the inner shore of the lake is a meadow , wherein grows asphodel ; here , too , is the fountain that makes war on memory , and is hence called Lethe .
All these particulars the ancients would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and her fellow-countryman Protesilaus , from Theseus the son of Aegeus , and from the hero of the Odyssey .
These witnesses ( whose evidence is entitled to our most respectful acceptance ) did not , as I gather , drink of the waters of Lethe ; because then they would not have remembered .
According to them , the supreme power is entirely in the hands of Pluto and Persephone , who , however , are assisted in the labours of government by a host of underlings : such are the Furies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such too is Hermes , though he is not always in attendance .
Judicial powers are vested in two satraps or viceroys , Minos and Rhadamanthus , both Cretans , and both sons of Zeus .
By them all good and just men who have followed the precepts of virtue are sent off in large detachments to form colonies , as it were , in the Elysian Plain , and there to lead the perfect life .
Evil-doers , on thecontrary , are handed over to the Furies , who conduct them to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are punished in due proportion to their iniquities .
What a variety of torments is there presented !
The rack , the fire , the gnawing vulture ; here Ixion spins upon his wheel , there Sisyphus rolls his stone .
I have not forgotten Tantalus ; but he stands elsewhere , stands parched on the Lake ’ s very brink , like to die of thirst , poor wretch !
Then there is the numerous class of neutral characters ; these wander about the meadow ; formless phantoms , that evade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they depend for their nourishment upon the libations and victims offered by us upon their tombs ; accordingly , a Shade who has no surviving friends or relations passes a hungry time of it in the lower world .
So profoundly have the common people been impressed with these doctrines that , when a man dies , the first act of his relations is to put a penny into his mouth , that he may have wherewithal to pay the ferryman : they do not stop to inquire what is the local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Aeginetan ; nor does it occur to them how much better it would be for the departed one if the fare were not forthcoming , –because then the ferryman would decline to take him , and he would be sent back into the living world .
Lest the Stygian Lake should prove inadequate to the requirements of ghostly toilets , the corpse is next washed , anointed with the choicest unguents to arrest the progress of decay , crowned with fresh flowers , and laid out in sumptuous raiment ; an obvious precaution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do for the deceased to take a chill on the journey , nor to exhibit himself to Cerberus with nothing on .
Lamentation follows .
The women wail ; men and women alike weep and beat their breasts and rend their hair and lacerate their cheeks ; clothes are also torn on the occasion , and dust sprinkled on the head .
The survivors are thus reduced to a more pitiable condition than the deceased : while they in all probability are rolling about and dashing their heads on the ground , he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reposes gracefully 13upon his lofty bier , adorned as it were for some pageant .
The mother–nay , it is the father , as likely as not , –now advances from among the relatives , falls upon the bier ( to heighten the dramatic effect , we will suppose its occupant to be young and handsome ) , and utters wild and meaningless ejaculations ; the corpse can not speak , otherwise it might have something to say in reply .
His son–the father exclaims , with a mournful emphasis on every word @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; he is gone ; torn away before his hour was come , leaving him alone to mourn ; he has never married , never begotten children , never been on the field of battle , never laid hand to the plough , never reached old age ; never again will he make merry , never again know the joys of love , never , alas !
tipple at the convivial board among his comrades .
And so on , and so on .
He imagines his son to be still coveting these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But this is nothing : time after time men have been known to slaughter horses upon the tomb , and concubines and pages ; to burn clothes and other finery , or bury it , in the idea that the deceased will find a profitable use for such things in the lower world .
Now the afflicted senior , in delivering the tragic utterances I have suggested above , and others of the same kind , is not , as I understand it , consulting the interests of his son ( who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though he shout louder than Stentor ) , nor yet his own ; he is perfectly aware of his sentiments , and has no occasion to bellow them into his own ear .
The natural conclusion is , that this tomfoolery is for the benefit of the spectators ; and all the time he has not an idea where his son is , or what may be his condition ; he can not even have reflected upon human life generally , or he would know that the loss of it is no such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the son has obtained leave from Aeacus and Pluto to take a peep into the daylight , and put a stop to these parental maunderings .
‘ Confound it , sir , ’ he might exclaim , ‘ what is the noise about ?
You bore me .
Enough of hair-plucking and face-scratching .
When you call me an ill-fated wretch , you abuse a better man than yourself , and a more fortunate .
Why are you so sorry for me ?
Is it because I am not a bald , bent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Is it because I have not lived to be a battered wreck , nor seen a thousand moons wax and wane , only to make a fool of myself at the last before a crowd ?
Can your sapience point to any single convenience of life , of which we are deprived in the lower world ?
I know what you will say : clothes and good dinners , wine and women , without which you think I shall be inconsolable .
Are you now to learn that freedom from hunger and thirst @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and insensibility to cold better than plenty of clothes ?
Come , I see you need enlightenment ; I will show you how lamentation ought to be done .
Make a fresh start , thus : Alas , my son !
Hunger and thirst and cold are his no longer !
He is gone , gone beyond the reach of sickness ; he fears not fever any more , nor enemies nor tyrants .
Never again , my son , shall love disturb your peace , impair your health , make hourly inroads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ change !
Never can you reach contemptible old age , never be an eyesore to your juniors !
–Confess , now , that my18 lamentation has the advantage of yours , in veracity , as in absurdity .
‘ Perhaps it is the pitchy darkness of the infernal regions that runs in your head ?
is that the trouble ?
Are you afraid I shall be suffocated in the confinement of the tomb ?
You should reflect that my eyes will presently decay , or ( if such is your good pleasure ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I shall have no occasion to notice either light or darkness .
However , let that pass .
But all this lamentation , now ; this fluting and beating of breasts ; these wholly disproportionate wailings : how am I the better for it all ?
And what do I want with a garlanded column over my grave ?
And what good do you suppose you are going to do by pouring wine on it ?
do you expect it to filter through all the way to Hades ?
As to the victims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that all the solid nutriment is whisked away heavenwards in the form of smoke , leaving us Shades precisely as we were ; the residue , being dust , is useless ; or is it your theory that Shades batten on ashes ?
Pluto ’ s realm is not so barren , nor asphodel so scarce with us , that we must apply to you for provisions.–What with this winding-sheet and these woollen bandages , my jaws have been effectually sealed up , or , by Tisiphone , I should have burst out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you talk and the things you do.
’ Thus far our corpse , leaning on one side , supported on an elbow .
Can we doubt that he is in the right of it ?
And yet these simpletons , not content with their own noise , must call in professional assistance : an artist in grief , with a fine repertoire of cut-and-dried sorrows at his command , assumes the direction of this inane choir , and supplies a theme for their woful acclamations .
So far , all men are fools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peculiarities make their appearance .
The Greeks burn their dead , the Persians bury them ; the Indian glazes the body , the Scythian eats it , the Egyptian embalms it .
In Egypt , indeed , the corpse , duly dried , is actually placed at table , –I have seen it done ; and it is quite a common thing for an Egyptian to relieve himself from pecuniary embarrassment by a timely visit to the pawnbroker , with his brother or father deceased .
The childish futility of pyramids and mounds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is obvious .
But some people go further , and attempt to plead the cause of the deceased with his infernal judges , or testify to his merits , by means of funeral games and laudatory epitaphs .
The finalabsurdity is the funeral feast , at which the assembled relatives strive to console the parents , and to prevail upon them to take food ; and , Heaven knows , they are willing enough to be persuaded , being almost prostrated by a three days ’ fast .
‘ How long is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one expostulates .
‘ Suffer the spirit of your departed saint to rest in peace .
Or if mourn you will , then for that very reason you must eat , that your strength may be proportioned to your grief.
’ At this point , a couple of lines of Homer go the round of the company : The parents are persuaded , though they go to work at first in a somewhat shamefaced manner ; they do not want it to be thought that after their bereavement they are still subject to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are some of the absurdities that may be observed in mourners ; for I have by no means exhausted the list .
And all springs from the vulgar error , that Death is the worst thing that can befall a man .

By Lucian of Samosata
THE behaviour of the average man in a time of bereavement, his own language and the remarks offered him by way of consolation, are things that will reward the attention of a curious observer. The mourner takes it for granted that a terrible blow has fallen both upon himself and upon the object of his lamentations: yet for all he knows to the contrary (and here I appeal to Pluto and Persephone) the departed one, so far from being entitled to commiseration, may find himself in improved circumstances. The feelings of the bereaved party are in fact guided solely by custom and convention. The procedure in such cases–but no: let me first state the popular beliefs on the subject of death itself; we shall then understand the motives for the elaborate ceremonial with which it is attended.
The vulgar (as philosophers call the generality of mankind), implicitly taking as their text-book the fictions of Homer and Hesiod and other poets, assume the existence of a deep subterranean hole called Hades; spacious, murky, and sunless, but by some mysterious means sufficiently lighted to render all its details visible. Its king is a brother of Zeus, one Pluto; whose name–so an able philologer assures me–contains a complimentary allusion to his ghostly wealth. As to the nature of his government, and the condition of his subjects, the authority allotted to him extends over all the dead, who, from the moment that they come under his control, are kept in unbreakable fetters; Shades are on no account permitted to return to Earth; to this rule there have been only two or three exceptions since the beginning of the world, and these were made for very urgent reasons. His realm is encompassed by vast rivers, whose very names inspire awe: Cocytus, Pyriphlegethon, and the like. Most formidable of all, and first to arrest the progress of the new-comer, is Acheron, that lake which none may pass save by the ferryman’s boat; it is too deep to be waded, too broad for the swimmer, and even defies the flight of birds deceased. At the very beginning of the descent is a gate of adamant: here Aeacus, a nephew of the king, stands on guard. By his side is a three-headed dog, a grim brute; to new arrivals, however, he is friendly enough, reserving his bark, and the yawning horror of his jaws, for the would-be runaway. On the inner shore of the lake is a meadow, wherein grows asphodel; here, too, is the fountain that makes war on memory, and is hence called Lethe. All these particulars the ancients would doubtless obtain from the Thessalian queen Alcestis and her fellow-countryman Protesilaus, from Theseus the son of Aegeus, and from the hero of the Odyssey. These witnesses (whose evidence is entitled to our most respectful acceptance) did not, as I gather, drink of the waters of Lethe; because then they would not have remembered. According to them, the supreme power is entirely in the hands of Pluto and Persephone, who, however, are assisted in the labours of government by a host of underlings: such are the Furies, the Pains, the Fears; such too is Hermes, though he is not always in attendance. Judicial powers are vested in two satraps or viceroys, Minos and Rhadamanthus, both Cretans, and both sons of Zeus. By them all good and just men who have followed the precepts of virtue are sent off in large detachments to form colonies, as it were, in the Elysian Plain, and there to lead the perfect life. Evil-doers, on thecontrary, are handed over to the Furies, who conduct them to the place of the wicked, where they are punished in due proportion to their iniquities. What a variety of torments is there presented! The rack, the fire, the gnawing vulture; here Ixion spins upon his wheel, there Sisyphus rolls his stone. I have not forgotten Tantalus; but he stands elsewhere, stands parched on the Lake’s very brink, like to die of thirst, poor wretch! Then there is the numerous class of neutral characters; these wander about the meadow; formless phantoms, that evade the touch like smoke. It seems that they depend for their nourishment upon the libations and victims offered by us upon their tombs; accordingly, a Shade who has no surviving friends or relations passes a hungry time of it in the lower world.
So profoundly have the common people been impressed with these doctrines that, when a man dies, the first act of his relations is to put a penny into his mouth, that he may have wherewithal to pay the ferryman: they do not stop to inquire what is the local currency, whether Attic or Macedonian or Aeginetan; nor does it occur to them how much better it would be for the departed one if the fare were not forthcoming,–because then the ferryman would decline to take him, and he would be sent back into the living world. Lest the Stygian Lake should prove inadequate to the requirements of ghostly toilets, the corpse is next washed, anointed with the choicest unguents to arrest the progress of decay, crowned with fresh flowers, and laid out in sumptuous raiment; an obvious precaution, this last; it would not do for the deceased to take a chill on the journey, nor to exhibit himself to Cerberus with nothing on. Lamentation follows. The women wail; men and women alike weep and beat their breasts and rend their hair and lacerate their cheeks; clothes are also torn on the occasion, and dust sprinkled on the head. The survivors are thus reduced to a more pitiable condition than the deceased: while they in all probability are rolling about and dashing their heads on the ground, he, bravely attired and gloriously garlanded, reposes gracefully 13upon his lofty bier, adorned as it were for some pageant. The mother–nay, it is the father, as likely as not,–now advances from among the relatives, falls upon the bier (to heighten the dramatic effect, we will suppose its occupant to be young and handsome), and utters wild and meaningless ejaculations; the corpse cannot speak, otherwise it might have something to say in reply. His son–the father exclaims, with a mournful emphasis on every word,–his beloved son is no more; he is gone; torn away before his hour was come, leaving him alone to mourn; he has never married, never begotten children, never been on the field of battle, never laid hand to the plough, never reached old age; never again will he make merry, never again know the joys of love, never, alas! tipple at the convivial board among his comrades. And so on, and so on. He imagines his son to be still coveting these things, and coveting them in vain. But this is nothing: time after time men have been known to slaughter horses upon the tomb, and concubines and pages; to burn clothes and other finery, or bury it, in the idea that the deceased will find a profitable use for such things in the lower world. Now the afflicted senior, in delivering the tragic utterances I have suggested above, and others of the same kind, is not, as I understand it, consulting the interests of his son (who he knows will not hear him, though he shout louder than Stentor), nor yet his own; he is perfectly aware of his sentiments, and has no occasion to bellow them into his own ear. The natural conclusion is, that this tomfoolery is for the benefit of the spectators; and all the time he has not an idea where his son is, or what may be his condition; he cannot even have reflected upon human life generally, or he would know that the loss of it is no such great matter. Let us imagine that the son has obtained leave from Aeacus and Pluto to take a peep into the daylight, and put a stop to these parental maunderings. ‘Confound it, sir,’ he might exclaim, ‘what is the noise about? You bore me. Enough of hair-plucking and face-scratching. When you call me an ill-fated wretch, you abuse a better man than yourself, and a more fortunate. Why are you so sorry for me? Is it because I am not a bald, bent, wrinkled old cripple like yourself? Is it because I have not lived to be a battered wreck, nor seen a thousand moons wax and wane, only to make a fool of myself at the last before a crowd? Can your sapience point to any single convenience of life, of which we are deprived in the lower world? I know what you will say: clothes and good dinners, wine and women, without which you think I shall be inconsolable. Are you now to learn that freedom from hunger and thirst is better than meat and drink, and insensibility to cold better than plenty of clothes? Come, I see you need enlightenment; I will show you how lamentation ought to be done. Make a fresh start, thus: Alas, my son! Hunger and thirst and cold are his no longer! He is gone, gone beyond the reach of sickness; he fears not fever any more, nor enemies nor tyrants. Never again, my son, shall love disturb your peace, impair your health, make hourly inroads on your purse; oh, heavy change! Never can you reach contemptible old age, never be an eyesore to your juniors!–Confess, now, that my18 lamentation has the advantage of yours, in veracity, as in absurdity.
‘Perhaps it is the pitchy darkness of the infernal regions that runs in your head? is that the trouble? Are you afraid I shall be suffocated in the confinement of the tomb? You should reflect that my eyes will presently decay, or (if such is your good pleasure) be consumed with fire; after which I shall have no occasion to notice either light or darkness. However, let that pass. But all this lamentation, now; this fluting and beating of breasts; these wholly disproportionate wailings: how am I the better for it all? And what do I want with a garlanded column over my grave? And what good do you suppose you are going to do by pouring wine on it? do you expect it to filter through all the way to Hades? As to the victims, you must surely see for yourselves that all the solid nutriment is whisked away heavenwards in the form of smoke, leaving us Shades precisely as we were; the residue, being dust, is useless; or is it your theory that Shades batten on ashes? Pluto’s realm is not so barren, nor asphodel so scarce with us, that we must apply to you for provisions.–What with this winding-sheet and these woollen bandages, my jaws have been effectually sealed up, or, by Tisiphone, I should have burst out laughing long before this at the stuff you talk and the things you do.’
And at the word Death sealed his lips for ever.
21
24
Thus far our corpse, leaning on one side, supported on an elbow. Can we doubt that he is in the right of it? And yet these simpletons, not content with their own noise, must call in professional assistance: an artist in grief, with a fine repertoire of cut-and-dried sorrows at his command, assumes the direction of this inane choir, and supplies a theme for their woful acclamations. So far, all men are fools alike: but at this point national peculiarities make their appearance. The Greeks burn their dead, the Persians bury them; the Indian glazes the body, the Scythian eats it, the Egyptian embalms it. In Egypt, indeed, the corpse, duly dried, is actually placed at table,–I have seen it done; and it is quite a common thing for an Egyptian to relieve himself from pecuniary embarrassment by a timely visit to the pawnbroker, with his brother or father deceased. The childish futility of pyramids and mounds and columns, with their short-lived inscriptions, is obvious. But some people go further, and attempt to plead the cause of the deceased with his infernal judges, or testify to his merits, by means of funeral games and laudatory epitaphs. The finalabsurdity is the funeral feast, at which the assembled relatives strive to console the parents, and to prevail upon them to take food; and, Heaven knows, they are willing enough to be persuaded, being almost prostrated by a three days’ fast. ‘How long is this to go on?’ some one expostulates. ‘Suffer the spirit of your departed saint to rest in peace. Or if mourn you will, then for that very reason you must eat, that your strength may be proportioned to your grief.’ At this point, a couple of lines of Homer go the round of the company:
Ev’n fair-haired Niobe forgat not food,
and
Not fasting mourn th’ Achaeans for their dead.
The parents are persuaded, though they go to work at first in a somewhat shamefaced manner; they do not want it to be thought that after their bereavement they are still subject to the infirmities of the flesh.
Such are some of the absurdities that may be observed in mourners; for I have by no means exhausted the list. And all springs from the vulgar error, that Death is the worst thing that can befall a man.
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-19--In 1 Week, 3 jewish Actors Separately Pretend to be White and Criticize Whites for Existing

January 27 , 2020 : The Guardian interviews Jewish actor David Schwimmer ( Friends ) who says “ I ’ m very aware of my own privilege as a heterosexual white male whose parents were able to pay for a private education for me .
I ’ ve always felt a sense of responsibility to give back and to call things out if I see an abuse of power.
” January 31 , 2020 : Adidas interviews Jewish actor Jonah Hill ( 21 Jump Street ) regarding their new partnership and the recent commercial he directed for them .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power and for the film industry to rid itself of white men .
He argues that it ’ s unfair for white men to continue to have the voice they ’ ve had .
He says “ And if I step aside because of that , then that ’ s dope too.
” February 2 , 2020 : Accepting his Baftas award , Jewish actor Joaquin Phoenix ( Joker ) criticized the all-white acting nominations .
He says “ I also feel conflicted – we send a very clear message to people of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ welcome here ’ .
I don ’ t think anybody wants a handout or preferential treatment .
People just want to be acknowledged and appreciated and respected for their work .
I ’ m ashamed to say that I ’ m part of the problem .
”

January 27, 2020: The Guardian interviews Jewish actor David Schwimmer (Friends) who says “I’m very aware of my own privilege as a heterosexual white male whose parents were able to pay for a private education for me. I’ve always felt a sense of responsibility to give back and to call things out if I see an abuse of power.”
January 31, 2020: Adidas interviews Jewish actor Jonah Hill (21 Jump Street) regarding their new partnership and the recent commercial he directed for them. He calls for white men to relinquish their power and for the film industry to rid itself of white men. He argues that it’s unfair for white men to continue to have the voice they’ve had. He says “And if I step aside because of that, then that’s dope too.”
February 2, 2020: Accepting his Baftas award, Jewish actor Joaquin Phoenix (Joker) criticized the all-white acting nominations. He says “I also feel conflicted – we send a very clear message to people of colour that ‘you’re not welcome here’. I don’t think anybody wants a handout or preferential treatment. People just want to be acknowledged and appreciated and respected for their work. I’m ashamed to say that I’m part of the problem.”
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-20--German Doctor Arrested by Neo-Stasi Police While Livestreaming about the New Infection Protection La

German Doctor Arrested by Neo-Stasi Police While Livestreaming about the New Infection Protection Law

Just the other day Germany passed a law that gives the executive branch unlimited power without needing to ask the @ @ @ @ @ any constitutional rights of all citizens .
Under the Infection Protection Law , culture is @ @ @ @ @ .
Bayern police broke into Dr. Andreas Noack ’ s house while he was livestreaming @ @ @ @ @ .

Just the other day Germany passed a law that gives the executive branch unlimited power without needing to ask the parliament anymore and completely nullifies any constitutional rights of all citizens. Under the Infection Protection Law, culture is no longer classified as entertainment.
Bayern police broke into Dr. Andreas Noack’s house while he was livestreaming on YouTube about this subject.
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-19--Holohoax: Verdict on Judge Jan Sehn

Holohoax: Verdict on Judge Jan Sehn

Concentration Camp Oswiecim-Brzezinka ( Auschwitz-Birkenau ) by Jan Sehn .
Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Prawnicze , 1961 .
Pp .
161 , ( 2 ) .
With 42 illustrations black and white photographs , a number of facsimile letters and several plans , including a large folding map at the rear showing the location of camps in Germany and occupied countries .
If one reads and examines Oswiecim-Brzezinka [ Auschwitz-Birkenau ] by Jan Sehn , the Judge who presided over the 1945-1947 Auschwitz trials in Poland , one is immediately compelled to acknowledge the book ’ s numerous , woeful deficiencies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any startling revelations from the Auschwitz trials conducted in Poland immediately after the war or entertaining hopes to discover any other convincing evidence as to the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz , they should think again .
Nary one word from the actual trials of former camp commandant Rudolf Höss , his assistant Maximillian Grabner , nor subsequent camp commandant Arthur Liebehenschel , et al is cited .
For rather predictable reasons , Sehn prefers to rely not on the records of the trials over which he personally presided , nor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accused and the accusers , or any additional supporting documentation , opting instead to quote liberally from Höss ’ questionable memoirs .
There is a underlying reason for this , of course .
Testimonies and statements can be examined and compared for their truthfulness , coherence and consistency .
They can also be examined for their untruthfulness , incoherence and inconsistencies .
Ergo Sehn deliberately avoids any mention of embarrassing testimony or statements which might lend themselves to an in-depth scrutiny by impartial researchers .
Even the testimony of the former so-called Sonderkommandos @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s preferred method of including their allegations merely as a matter of his own personal narration , without ever mentioning where the information he relates was received , by whom , when , where , or by what methods .
In spite of these shortcomings , the book is still of value to those familiar with the usual gamut of claims regarding Auschwitz for reasons which will be delineated below .
A few relevant facts amidst a mountain of distortions are grudgingly conceded by Sehn , most notably a rather accurate description @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which led to severe outbreaks of typhus , which in turn caused enormous casualties among inmates and staff alike throughout the camp ’ s existence .
For example , on pp .
46-47 , Sehn writes : One of the few documents actually produced in the book is in fact highly suspect .
On page 80 , illustration 20 , is a list of checked names of female inmates , which Sehn describes as “ Beginning and end of the list of women selected for gassing by Marie Mandel in the Brezezinka @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , on August 21 , 1943.
” However , in closely examining this list , it appears more realistic to suggest that the list was merely a copy of two pages taken from the daily roll call , or Appell , for which names were routinely checked off as “ present ” , as there is absolutely no indication whatsoever on the reproduced documents that these names were any part of a list selected for gassing or Sonderbehandlung .
( Special treatment ) Occasionally , Sehn ventures to make statements which are totally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In chapter XI , p. 105 , it is alleged that Wilhelm Boger , assistant to Maximillian Grabner , “ admitted to having shot personally at Oswiecim 25,000 people.
” [ 4 ] Of course , in a similar context , Grabner admitted to his interrogators that he was “ personally responsible for the deaths of 3.5 million people ” at Auschwitz .
An absolutely impossible claim altogether , and based on Soviet propaganda , as even the curator of the Auschwitz Museum in Poland only claims 1 to 1.5 million deaths at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been substantially revised and lowered by ‘ mainstream ’ holocaust historians such as the now deceased Jean Claude Pressac and Gerald Reitlinger .
Undoubtedly the appropriately numbered chapter XIII is entitled “ Gas Chambers , ” and is of some interest .
Sehn declares , again without any supporting proof whatsoever , that two gas chambers were fitted out in the woods near Birkenau in March 1942 , which consisted of two peasant cottages transformed into lethal homicidal gas chambers .
Two huts were supposedly constructed nearby for the victims to undress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bunker I , which , according to Sehn , was outfitted with two gas chambers which could kill up to 2,000 individuals at one time , and Bunker II , where there were FOUR gas chambers .
In both of these units , Sehn claims that the gas was introduced into the buildings via “ gas openings placed in the side walls.
” Unfortunately , not one trace of these bunkers exists or has ever been located to the best of my knowledge .
However , the one revealing fact openly admitted by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims regarding Auschwitz , as the stories have been handed down to historians , researchers , and general public alike .
He writes on page 125 : In view of this candid admission by the Auschwitz trial judge , no further proof need be adduced to substantiate the charge that the Auschwitz case as presented and investigated in Poland was a Soviet managed affair from beginning to end .
Concerning the removal of a warning scent in Zyklon B , Sehn constructs a completely imaginary scenario as cited on p. 128 : What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testimony of the Head of Fumigation at Auschwitz , Artur Breitweiser , who testified that the warning agent in Zyklon had been removed , not at the request of the SS , but at the discretion of the manufacturer , which issued appropriate advisories to the SS fumigation teams to that effect .
Thus , here Sehn can be seen as clearly espousing Soviet propaganda relating to the deletion of a warning ingredient in the manufacture of Zyklon , which had absolutely nothing to do with exterminating people .
Rather startling , though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the trial of Dr. Gerhard Peters , the former managing director of DEGESCH , the firm which manufactured Zyklon B. Sehn writes , “ Dr .
Gerhard Peters… appeared eight times before German courts .
His defence included the claim that , in producing cyclon B , he acted in good faith thinking that he ‘ was bringing relief to people sentenced to death in any case.
’ Peters appeared in the dock for the last time in 1955 , when a Frankfort-on-Main jury returned a verdict of ‘ guilt not proven.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ‘ although Peters did voluntarily agree to supply the camp with poison gas , it is impossible today to prove beyond doubt that people were really killed in Oswiecim with cyclon B . '
” [ 6 ] In presenting detailed information as to how homicidal gassings were accomplished , Sehn writes that the underground bunker at Krema II was 210 sq .
m. in area , in which three thousand victims were crammed at one time .
In order to facilitate the release of the Zyklon B pellets more efficiently , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chamber was being heated with portable braziers , ” ( ! )
adding that “ this was done to give better conditions for the evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide.
” [ 7 ] “ Then ” he continues , “ the door was quickly screwed shut , and the waiting disinfectors immediately infused cyclon into the gas chambers through special openings which acted like sprays [ sic ! ]
and ensured a rapid and maximum effect of the poison .
Gas formed immediately.
” [ 8 ] Additional descriptions are likewise puzzling .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the testimony of those who claimed to have worked as Sonderkommandos at Auschwitz , Sehn writes : Yet , if this were so , how were people like Filip Mueller , Dr. Nyiszli , Henryk Tauber and Schlomo Dragon able to elude their fate for years as decided by such powerful men as Eichmann ?
Aside from the gassing accusation , Sehn is careful to note that Auschwitz always had a problem with extraordinarily high death rates , as mentioned above and amplified upon this topic below : As to the exact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Auschwitz , the former trial judge was quite explicit , writing : In what is now an embarrassing footnote to the statement above , Sehn thought fit to add : Amazingly , Sehn does not cite even one document from the Auschwitz trials in support of the four million claim , opting instead to rely upon the “ blind leading the blind ” method , but his statement makes incontestably clear the actual originators of the bogus four million figure and how it was meant to be disseminated as incontestable fact .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extremely disappointing volume is a curious quotation cited by either Sehn or the publisher , which may have some relevance as to how the bogus Soviet manufactured claim relating to the “ Nazis ” alleged manufacturing of emaciated jewish corpses into soap came into being .
On page 144 , we read : Thus , it appears that the Soviets had actually happened upon this book written by Dr. Brack , which applied to alleged American practices , and then transferred the imagery to their list of alleged “ Nazi ” atrocities .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , even arranged to send two emissaries from the Soviet jewish Antifascist League to travel to New York City ’ s Madison Square Garden , equipped with bars of ‘ human soap ’ in their pockets , in order to rouse “ American ” jews into contributing more money to the Soviet war machine .
Moreover , as early as August 1941 , Ehrenburg was transmitting rousing propaganda speeches from Moscow to “ American ” and “ British ” jews in which he claimed that already ‘ millions ’ of jews had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ realizing that Sehn ’ s appalling lack of documentation left too many unresolved questions unanswered , the book ’ s publishers opted for an attempt at damage control by adding a preface to the book in which they sought to nip any possible criticism of the book in the bud by the liberal use of broad generalizations .
They wrote : “ After the liberation of Oswiecim by the Soviet Army in January 1945 , the Soviet State Extraordinary Commission conducted its preliminary inquiry into criminal acts perpetrated behind the electrified wires of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fortnight and could not , of course , bring to light all the facts .
The whole truth about the Oswiecim camp was uncovered and reviewed during the intense and thorough inquiry made by the Chief Commission for the Investigation of ‘ Nazi ’ Crimes in Poland .
This investigation , starting almost immediately after the liberation of Oswiecim by the Soviet Army , and lasting more than a year , was presided over by Judge Dr. Jan Sehn , member of the Chief Commission .
During the investigation , the vast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was thoroughly studied .
Special commissions of experts were set up to examine the ruins of the crematoria and gas chambers – destroyed prior to the evacuation of the camp – and of the pits in which the bodies of the gassed victims used to be burnt .
All documents , plans and maps , found in the camp and in its subsidiaries or in various ways recovered , were studied in detail .
Although only a fragment of the prodigious quantity of camp records , they do constitute authentic evidence of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ examined from among the former inmates and from the population in the vicinity of the camp .
All the investigations were carried out in accordance with court procedure and the provisions of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code .
The results of this investigation by the Chief Commission for the Investigation of ‘ Nazi ’ Crimes in Poland were later used as evidence before the Polish Supreme National Tribunal in 1947 [ 14 ] ….Rudolf Höss and his chief associates were sentenced to death , other members of the camp staff to various terms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Hans Muench , from the SS Hygiene Institute at Rajsko , was found not guilty , evidence produced having shown that he did not take part in the crimes committed in the camp [ 15 ] ….Of the 400,000 or so inmates registered at Oswiecim , only one-third survived .
Millions of innocent people , never recorded in the camp files , arrived in drafts and perished at once in the Brzezinka gas chambers and crematoria .
altogether , some four million human beings met their death at Oswiecim.
” – Taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Janusz Gumkowski , Director , The Chief Commission for the Investigation of ‘ Nazi ’ Crimes in Poland , pp .
7-9 .
Significantly , the surest proof that Jan Sehn was a judeo-Soviet dupe was provided by Sehn himself .
Taking into consideration the fact that Sehn ’ s book was published in 1957 , tens years after the conclusion of the Polish Auschwitz trials , it is interesting to note that the Polish judge relied exclusively on Höss ’ discredited memoirs rather than publishing direct testimony from the trials .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ volume is quite telling , for he cites only those statements which supposedly prove the prosecutor ’ s case against the accused , while ignoring contradictory statements .
For example , Sehn totally ignores the fact that Höss had actually reduced the death figures at Auschwitz on at least three occasions , finally settling for 1.5 million .
[ 16 ] The surest proof that Sehn was working on behalf of Soviet propagandists may be confirmed by the fact that he ignored these lower figures and insisted , directly in line with Soviet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ total deaths at Auschwitz was indisputably set at four million .

Verdict on Jan Sehn
Reassessing “Concentration Camp Oswiecim-Brzezinka”. A Review By Ross Mccullough
Concentration Camp Oswiecim-Brzezinka (Auschwitz-Birkenau) by Jan Sehn. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, 1961. Pp. 161, (2). With 42 illustrations black and white photographs, a number of facsimile letters and several plans, including a large folding map at the rear showing the location of camps in Germany and occupied countries.
If one reads and examines Oswiecim-Brzezinka [Auschwitz-Birkenau] by Jan Sehn, the Judge who presided over the 1945-1947 Auschwitz trials in Poland, one is immediately compelled to acknowledge the book’s numerous, woeful deficiencies.
jewish dupe and holohoax proponent Judge Jan Sehn
If researchers are expecting to find any startling revelations from the Auschwitz trials conducted in Poland immediately after the war or entertaining hopes to discover any other convincing evidence as to the existence of homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, they should think again. Nary one word from the actual trials of former camp commandant Rudolf Höss, his assistant Maximillian Grabner, nor subsequent camp commandant Arthur Liebehenschel, et al is cited. For rather predictable reasons, Sehn prefers to rely not on the records of the trials over which he personally presided, nor on the affidavits or testimony of the accused and the accusers, or any additional supporting documentation, opting instead to quote liberally from Höss’ questionable memoirs. There is a underlying reason for this, of course. Testimonies and statements can be examined and compared for their truthfulness, coherence and consistency. They can also be examined for their untruthfulness, incoherence and inconsistencies. Ergo Sehn deliberately avoids any mention of embarrassing testimony or statements which might lend themselves to an in-depth scrutiny by impartial researchers. Even the testimony of the former so-called Sonderkommandos is completely ignored, save for Sehn’s preferred method of including their allegations merely as a matter of his own personal narration, without ever mentioning where the information he relates was received, by whom, when, where, or by what methods.
In spite of these shortcomings, the book is still of value to those familiar with the usual gamut of claims regarding Auschwitz for reasons which will be delineated below.
A few relevant facts amidst a mountain of distortions are grudgingly conceded by Sehn, most notably a rather accurate description of the horrific conditions in the camp, which led to severe outbreaks of typhus, which in turn caused enormous casualties among inmates and staff alike throughout the camp’s existence.
For example, on pp. 46-47, Sehn writes:
“None of the camp huts had ventilation. The floor was of clay, which during droughts, clouds of dust would rise, while during wet weather a large puddle would form where the roof leaked. In these conditions, the huts were a breeding place for fleas, lice and rats, which plagued the inmates and carried infectious diseases.”[1]
And, on page 66:
“Lice infection, scabies and mange, as well as violent epidemics of typhus which decimated the prisoners especially in winter, were the inevitable consequences of the anti-humanitarian hygienic and sanitary conditions in the camp. They inexorably followed the lack of water, the impossibility of washing and changing underclothes, and the incredible overcrowding in huts.[2] “The prisoners were also decimated by typhoid fever in all its varieties, and by malaria.” “The starved and undermined constitutions of the inmates were incapable of resistance to disease, and the death rate among the sick was very high.”[3]
One of the few documents actually produced in the book is in fact highly suspect. On page 80, illustration 20, is a list of checked names of female inmates, which Sehn describes as “Beginning and end of the list of women selected for gassing by Marie Mandel in the Brezezinka (Birkenau) women’s camp, on August 21, 1943.” However, in closely examining this list, it appears more realistic to suggest that the list was merely a copy of two pages taken from the daily roll call, or Appell, for which names were routinely checked off as “present”, as there is absolutely no indication whatsoever on the reproduced documents that these names were any part of a list selected for gassing or Sonderbehandlung.(Special treatment)
List for Roll Call, or Sonderbehandlung?
Occasionally, Sehn ventures to make statements which are totally incredible, such as the following:
In chapter XI, p. 105, it is alleged that Wilhelm Boger, assistant to Maximillian Grabner, “admitted to having shot personally at Oswiecim 25,000 people.”[4] Of course, in a similar context, Grabner admitted to his interrogators that he was “personally responsible for the deaths of 3.5 million people” at Auschwitz. An absolutely impossible claim altogether, and based on Soviet propaganda, as even the curator of the Auschwitz Museum in Poland only claims 1 to 1.5 million deaths at the camp, and this figure itself has been substantially revised and lowered by ‘mainstream’ holocaust historians such as the now deceased Jean Claude Pressac and Gerald Reitlinger.
Undoubtedly the appropriately numbered chapter XIII is entitled “Gas Chambers,” and is of some interest. Sehn declares, again without any supporting proof whatsoever, that two gas chambers were fitted out in the woods near Birkenau in March 1942, which consisted of two peasant cottages transformed into lethal homicidal gas chambers. Two huts were supposedly constructed nearby for the victims to undress. These cottages are referred to as Bunker I, which, according to Sehn, was outfitted with two gas chambers which could kill up to 2,000 individuals at one time, and Bunker II, where there were FOUR gas chambers. In both of these units, Sehn claims that the gas was introduced into the buildings via “gas openings placed in the side walls.”
Unfortunately, not one trace of these bunkers exists or has ever been located to the best of my knowledge.
However, the one revealing fact openly admitted by Sehn is the actual source for the claims regarding Auschwitz, as the stories have been handed down to historians, researchers, and general public alike. He writes on page 125:
“The vast documentary evidence accumulated by the Soviet Extraordinary Commission, and the Chief Commission for the Investigation of ‘Nazi’ Crimes in Poland, reveals that the Brzezinka gas chambers could exterminate some 60,000 people per twenty-four hours.”[5]
In view of this candid admission by the Auschwitz trial judge, no further proof need be adduced to substantiate the charge that the Auschwitz case as presented and investigated in Poland was a Soviet managed affair from beginning to end.
Concerning the removal of a warning scent in Zyklon B, Sehn constructs a completely imaginary scenario as cited on p. 128:
“Contrary to effective German regulations, cyclon B for Oswiecim was produced without a warning ingredient (ohne Warnstoff), which means that the producer, consignors and SS wanted those who breathed air polluted by cyclon not to realize the danger of poisoning.”
What Sehn omitted from his manuscript was the testimony of the Head of Fumigation at Auschwitz, Artur Breitweiser, who testified that the warning agent in Zyklon had been removed, not at the request of the SS, but at the discretion of the manufacturer, which issued appropriate advisories to the SS fumigation teams to that effect. Thus, here Sehn can be seen as clearly espousing Soviet propaganda relating to the deletion of a warning ingredient in the manufacture of Zyklon, which had absolutely nothing to do with exterminating people.
Rather startling, though, is Sehn’s revelation pertaining to the trial of Dr. Gerhard Peters, the former managing director of DEGESCH, the firm which manufactured Zyklon B. Sehn writes,
“Dr. Gerhard Peters… appeared eight times before German courts. His defence included the claim that, in producing cyclon B, he acted in good faith thinking that he ‘was bringing relief to people sentenced to death in any case.’ Peters appeared in the dock for the last time in 1955, when a Frankfort-on-Main jury returned a verdict of ‘guilt not proven.’ Giving judgment, the court emphasized that ‘although Peters did voluntarily agree to supply the camp with poison gas, it is impossible today to prove beyond doubt that people were really killed in Oswiecim with cyclon B.'”[6]
What an admission!
In presenting detailed information as to how homicidal gassings were accomplished, Sehn writes that the underground bunker at Krema II was 210 sq. m. in area, in which three thousand victims were crammed at one time. In order to facilitate the release of the Zyklon B pellets more efficiently, Sehn informs us that “the gas chamber was being heated with portable braziers,” (!) adding that “this was done to give better conditions for the evaporation of the hydrogen cyanide.”[7] “Then” he continues, “the door was quickly screwed shut, and the waiting disinfectors immediately infused cyclon into the gas chambers through special openings which acted like sprays [sic!] and ensured a rapid and maximum effect of the poison. Gas formed immediately.”[8]
Additional descriptions are likewise puzzling. For example:
“The evidence of crematoria stokers[9] reveals that after the door of the gas chamber was closed, the victims would crowd near it, break the glass panes in the peepholes, damage the electrical wires and ventilation.”[10]
Yet, after referring to the testimony of those who claimed to have worked as Sonderkommandos at Auschwitz, Sehn writes:
“All the work with the bodies of the gassed was performed by special detachments of jewish prisoners who lived in a separate block, inaccessible to other inmates. According to Eichmann’s instruction, they, too were to be destroyed after every major gassing operation.”[11]
Yet, if this were so, how were people like Filip Mueller, Dr. Nyiszli, Henryk Tauber and Schlomo Dragon able to elude their fate for years as decided by such powerful men as Eichmann?
Aside from the gassing accusation, Sehn is careful to note that Auschwitz always had a problem with extraordinarily high death rates, as mentioned above and amplified upon this topic below:
“Even before the mass extermination of jews began, the very high death rate in the Oswiecim camp, both ‘natural’ i. e. caused by exhaustion and diseases, and resulting from the deliberate murder of inmates, produced a large number of bodies which had to be disposed of….”[12]
As to the exact numbers of dead from all causes at Auschwitz, the former trial judge was quite explicit, writing:
“The entire mass of evidence collected reveals that, taking into account the time during which the crematoria and other installations at Brzezinka were in operation, the number of people gassed and burnt in them was not less than four million. This tallies with the findings of the Soviet commission, already mentioned, and is also substantiated by the judgments of the International Military Tribunal delivered at the trial of the principal “Nazi” war criminals.”[13]
In what is now an embarrassing footnote to the statement above, Sehn thought fit to add:
“Judgment of the International Military Tribunal, official English text p, 252-252. See also Father Küble, ‘Die Konzentrationslager, eine Gewissensfrage für das deutsche Volk und für die Welt,’ Third edition. A. Weber Varlag, Singen Hohentwiel; also Dr. Weber E., -Zwölf Jare Nationalsozialismus, Second edition, Praktikus, 1945. Both these authors give the number of people murdered at Oswiecim as four million.”
Amazingly, Sehn does not cite even one document from the Auschwitz trials in support of the four million claim, opting instead to rely upon the “blind leading the blind” method, but his statement makes incontestably clear the actual originators of the bogus four million figure and how it was meant to be disseminated as incontestable fact.
The final item of interest in this otherwise extremely disappointing volume is a curious quotation cited by either Sehn or the publisher, which may have some relevance as to how the bogus Soviet manufactured claim relating to the “Nazis” alleged manufacturing of emaciated jewish corpses into soap came into being. On page 144, we read:
“It is worth mentioning in this connection an extract from the paper by Dr. E. Brack, on the significance of the phenomenon of death as regards court proceedings: (German text omitted. English translation follows:) ‘It might be added here as a curiosity that the impious Americans wanted to extract from bodies all that could be used as ‘material’: above all they speculated whether human bodies could not be used for soap manufacture. They also disliked the idea of dental gold lying unproductively in the earth). Dr. Brack E., ‘Form und Wesen des gerichtlich wichtigen Todes‘, Lubeck, 1942, p. 73.'”
Thus, it appears that the Soviets had actually happened upon this book written by Dr. Brack, which applied to alleged American practices, and then transferred the imagery to their list of alleged “Nazi” atrocities.
Stalin’s lapdog, Ilya Ehrenburg, even arranged to send two emissaries from the Soviet jewish Antifascist League to travel to New York City’s Madison Square Garden, equipped with bars of ‘human soap’ in their pockets, in order to rouse “American” jews into contributing more money to the Soviet war machine.
Moreover, as early as August 1941, Ehrenburg was transmitting rousing propaganda speeches from Moscow to “American” and “British” jews in which he claimed that already ‘millions’ of jews had been killed by the “Nazis.”
Undoubtedly realizing that Sehn’s appalling lack of documentation left too many unresolved questions unanswered, the book’s publishers opted for an attempt at damage control by adding a preface to the book in which they sought to nip any possible criticism of the book in the bud by the liberal use of broad generalizations. They wrote:
“After the liberation of Oswiecim by the Soviet Army in January 1945, the Soviet State Extraordinary Commission conducted its preliminary inquiry into criminal acts perpetrated behind the electrified wires of the camp; the investigation lasted about a fortnight and could not, of course, bring to light all the facts. The whole truth about the Oswiecim camp was uncovered and reviewed during the intense and thorough inquiry made by the Chief Commission for the Investigation of ‘Nazi’ Crimes in Poland. This investigation, starting almost immediately after the liberation of Oswiecim by the Soviet Army, and lasting more than a year, was presided over by Judge Dr. Jan Sehn, member of the Chief Commission. During the investigation, the vast area of the extensive Oswiecim camp complex was thoroughly studied. Special commissions of experts were set up to examine the ruins of the crematoria and gas chambers – destroyed prior to the evacuation of the camp – and of the pits in which the bodies of the gassed victims used to be burnt. All documents, plans and maps, found in the camp and in its subsidiaries or in various ways recovered, were studied in detail. Although only a fragment of the prodigious quantity of camp records, they do constitute authentic evidence of the greatest importance. Hundreds of witnesses were examined from among the former inmates and from the population in the vicinity of the camp. All the investigations were carried out in accordance with court procedure and the provisions of the Polish Criminal Procedure Code. The results of this investigation by the Chief Commission for the Investigation of ‘Nazi’ Crimes in Poland were later used as evidence before the Polish Supreme National Tribunal in 1947[14]….Rudolf Höss and his chief associates were sentenced to death, other members of the camp staff to various terms of imprisonment. One of the defendants, Hans Muench, from the SS Hygiene Institute at Rajsko, was found not guilty, evidence produced having shown that he did not take part in the crimes committed in the camp[15]….Of the 400,000 or so inmates registered at Oswiecim, only one-third survived. Millions of innocent people, never recorded in the camp files, arrived in drafts and perished at once in the Brzezinka gas chambers and crematoria. altogether, some four million human beings met their death at Oswiecim.” – Taken from the preface to the book written by Janusz Gumkowski, Director, The Chief Commission for the Investigation of ‘Nazi’ Crimes in Poland, pp. 7-9.
Significantly, the surest proof that Jan Sehn was a judeo-Soviet dupe was provided by Sehn himself. Taking into consideration the fact that Sehn’s book was published in 1957, tens years after the conclusion of the Polish Auschwitz trials, it is interesting to note that the Polish judge relied exclusively on Höss’ discredited memoirs rather than publishing direct testimony from the trials. His arbitrary selection of quotes from that volume is quite telling, for he cites only those statements which supposedly prove the prosecutor’s case against the accused, while ignoring contradictory statements. For example, Sehn totally ignores the fact that Höss had actually reduced the death figures at Auschwitz on at least three occasions, finally settling for 1.5 million.[16] The surest proof that Sehn was working on behalf of Soviet propagandists may be confirmed by the fact that he ignored these lower figures and insisted, directly in line with Soviet propaganda, that the true figure for total deaths at Auschwitz was indisputably set at four million.
What a web they weave!
Share now!
Author: Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician Aryan - "National Socialist" - Musician


renegadetribune--2020-11-19--Robert Schumann – Symphony No. 3 “Rheinische”

This was the last symphony composed by Robert Schumann .
It premiered on February 6 , 1851 in Düsseldorf , @ @ @ @ @ , which received some mixed reviews .
It was inspired by a trip he and @ @ @ @ @ Rhineland .
He was inspired to write the symphony after a trip to the Rhineland @ @ @ @ @ This journey was a happy and peaceful trip , which felt to them as if @ @ @ @ @ .
He incorporated elements of the journey and portrayed other experiences from his life in @ @ @ @ @ )

This was the last symphony composed by Robert Schumann. It premiered on February 6, 1851 in Düsseldorf, and Schumann conducted the piece, which received some mixed reviews. It was inspired by a trip he and his wife took to the Rhineland.
He was inspired to write the symphony after a trip to the Rhineland with his wife Clara. This journey was a happy and peaceful trip, which felt to them as if they were on a pilgrimage. He incorporated elements of the journey and portrayed other experiences from his life in the music. (Wiki)
Conductor: Herbert von Karajan
Performance: Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra
Recording date: 1971
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt


renegadetribune--2020-11-19--Most Influential 20th Century jewish Leader Warns jews Dishonestly Posing as Whites is Backfiring

Chabad Rebbe warns the Jews that their attempts to disguise themselves as white are failing and that White people have become wise to the act .
He says that their attempts are counter-intuitive , meaning that the more Jews try to operate undetected amongst whites , the more Jews agitate whites for the deception is adding insult to injury .
He explains that disguising themselves is futile because the nature and soul of the Jew is detectable to whites long before the Jew thinks he ’ s displayed it .
He likens Jew masquerading as White to a lamb amongst @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state of awareness of the lamb ’ s presence .
In reality , the roles are reversed .
It ’ s the Jew who ’ s the wolf in sheep ’ s clothing amongst the sheep .
Chabad is one of the world ’ s best-known Orthodox Jewish Hasidic movements .
It is one of the largest Hasidic groups and Jewish religious organizations in the world .
A Rebbe is the spiritual leader in the Hasidic movement .
Therefore , Chabad Rebbe means the leader of one the largest Jewish organizations in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent rebbe , is considered one of the most influential Jewish leaders of the 20th century .
Many Jews consider him to be the Jewish Messiah , some believe him to be still alive and some believe him to be God .
Among Jews , Schneerson is renowned for his intellect .
Footage from the archives of Jewish Educational Media ( JEM ) in partnership with the official Chabad website .
Date of footage unconfirmed .

Chabad Rebbe warns the Jews that their attempts to disguise themselves as white are failing and that White people have become wise to the act. He says that their attempts are counter-intuitive, meaning that the more Jews try to operate undetected amongst whites, the more Jews agitate whites for the deception is adding insult to injury. He explains that disguising themselves is futile because the nature and soul of the Jew is detectable to whites long before the Jew thinks he’s displayed it. He likens Jew masquerading as White to a lamb amongst wolves, the wolves in a heightened state of awareness of the lamb’s presence. In reality, the roles are reversed. It’s the Jew who’s the wolf in sheep’s clothing amongst the sheep. Chabad is one of the world’s best-known Orthodox Jewish Hasidic movements. It is one of the largest Hasidic groups and Jewish religious organizations in the world. A Rebbe is the spiritual leader in the Hasidic movement. Therefore, Chabad Rebbe means the leader of one the largest Jewish organizations in the world. Menachem Mendel Schneerson, a recent rebbe, is considered one of the most influential Jewish leaders of the 20th century. Many Jews consider him to be the Jewish Messiah, some believe him to be still alive and some believe him to be God. Among Jews, Schneerson is renowned for his intellect. Footage from the archives of Jewish Educational Media (JEM) in partnership with the official Chabad website. Date of footage unconfirmed.
Bitchute link
Share now!
Author: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: Thanks for being a reader of this site. Your contributions make this all possible. You can send support to: Kyle Hunt, PO Box 1052, Sorrento FL 32776. Bitcoin address: 1AfppjYZddJzc2C15PXKMsnyBPjPJQezwA . CashApp: https://cash.app/$thekylehunt