thegreanvillepostbiasrating--2020-04-26--Contrarian Viewpoints: The New Meaning of Genocide

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible .
Share with kin , friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise .
It is a paraphrase , of course , of the inimitable Dame Rebecca West , advanced with unshakable confidence that she would have heartily approved if she were alive today .
The Corona virus put-on job has now been exposed for the brazen social engineering scheme , potential vaccination rip-off ( and here ) , and ideologically driven mass population reduction project that it had always been , from the start .
We now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to deconstruct the mendacious , hysteria inducing narrative that was concocted to bludgeon the imprisoned world into submissive acquiescence to its self-destruction .
The key fact that the Covid-19 virus is a laboratory product and therefore man-made was authoritatively established by French Prof. Luc Montagnier who recently disclosed the results of his laboratory analysis of the virus genome .
He found it to be laced with spliced-in HIV sequences , which effectively excludes the possibility of its being the product of a natural process .
( Prof. Montaigner put it extremely delicately : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus , not the whole , has been manipulated ” . )
Was it manipulated by bats in some Chinese caves ?
Prof. Montaigner , incidentally , is eminently qualified to speak on the subject as he was in 2008 a recipient of the Nobel Prize in medicine for identifying the HIV virus .
The fact that as soon as he let the cat out of the bag he became subjected to harsh denunciation ( here and here ) by all the right circles lends powerful support to the credibility of his findings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even earlier , in February , by a group of Indian scientists and published in a paper entitled “ Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HI , V-1 gp120 and Gag ” .
Reassuringly , under ferocious pressure and ridicule by fake news commissars ( and here ) , the scientists were compelled to withdraw their bold paper , because it appeared to have crossed the line of permissible Corona virus discourse even before Prof. Montaigner came out with his assertions .
All the more reason to pay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undeniably significant implications of these fully congruent findings .
Underlining the fact that we have been plunged , without consent and mostly without awareness , into a post-truth world , facts have largely been supplanted by narratives .
And narratives are essentially politically convenient fairy tales that nobody sincerely believes but practically everyone must publicly adhere to in order to hold on to what little reputation and dwindling benefits they ’ ve got left .
Team player adherence to public lies ( sorry , fairy tales ) is a test of good global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to their moral credit the French professor and the Indian researchers have obviously and perhaps to their lasting professional detriment – failed .
Fortunately , the ranks of non-team players in the Corona virus controversy , with all the lurking personal perils that poses , have actually been growing , rather than shrinking .
We are indebted to Dr. Shiva Ayadurai , a brave Indian-American scientist , for making us aware that immunological deficiency is the principal condition propitiating the spread of the Corona virus and that mass lockdowns , causing sun and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other debilitating psychological conditions , has the effect of increasing instead of reducing the immunological vulnerability of the human organism .
Another scientist with impeccable credentials , Dr Rashid Buttar , has argued compellingly that the prevalent Corona virus narrative does not add up .
Predictably , this non-team player has also been subjected to brutal media assaults and his public statements have provoked the fury of the political correctness commissariat .
In Dr Buttar ’ s view , anyone who is supporting the use of vaccination to combat COVID-19 is either @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is financially motivated .
The basic fundamentals of how the human body works are , he argues , ignored and in the process , and while ostensibly treating patients infected by the virus , basic neurological , physical , virological and medical principles are being violated or simply put aside .
Not without reason , Dr Buttar points out that people with expert knowledge are silent either because of social pressures or fear of losing their license .
The concerted effort to blot out every opinion , no matter how qualified , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the specious pretext that it “ violates YouTube ’ s terms of service ” or the mysteriously undefined “ community guidelines , ” is undoubtedly the most persuasive indication of the narrative ’ s extreme fragility .
While some competent critiques still manage to squeak through the “ bodyguard of lies ” ( here , here , and here ) , all the algorithms have been activated to keep non-conforming , question and doubt-provoking opinions off the table and out of the purview of the immature and irresponsible masses .
So to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ West , what is going on ?
What is the meta-script ( as Israel Shamir has coyly put it ) behind this impressive global production ?
The dark intimations that in “ elite ” circles there may be an intense interest in reducing the excessive number of useless eaters to a smaller and more docile cohort of helot-like servants are not without empirical basis .
Why the fanatical insistence on mass vaccination on a global scale , for our own good of course , although the concept would not even pass the scrutiny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who is well aware that vaccination does not work for prospective or mutated new viruses ?
Or are we all expected now to fall prey precisely to Covid-19 and be vaccinated willy-nilly against its ravages ?
On whose authority are wealthy private individuals with no medical training but close financial ties to the pharmacological industry announcing public health policy measures and determining the particulars and duration of their application ?
What arcane foreknowledge enabled them to presciently predict the current pandemic several years ago and then suspiciously again , last year several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ May the health and welfare of billions of human beings be safely entrusted to self-proclaimed “ philanthropists ” whose actions are driven entirely by the profit motive , in its various financial , ideological , and perhaps even occult forms ?
Will billions of people succumb to a corporate media induced mass hysteria and allow profit-making unknown substances to be injected into their bodies , in complete disregard of the fact that on previous occasions similar forms of “ relief ” had wrought devastation and havoc throughout Asia and Africa , and wherever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has good reason to fear and tremble , not so much at the dreaded disease as at its potentially terrifying cure , which we are told is in the making ( perhaps in the same laboratories where the disease was concocted ) and undoubtedly will soon be unveiled .
Puke if you must

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Stephen Karganovic
[dropcap]I[/dropcap]t is a paraphrase, of course, of the inimitable Dame Rebecca West, advanced with unshakable confidence that she would have heartily approved if she were alive today.
The Corona virus put-on job has now been exposed for the brazen social engineering scheme, potential vaccination rip-off (and here), and ideologically driven mass population reduction project that it had always been, from the start.
We now have all the basic facts we require to deconstruct the mendacious, hysteria inducing narrative that was concocted to bludgeon the imprisoned world into submissive acquiescence to its self-destruction.
The key fact that the Covid-19 virus is a laboratory product and therefore man-made was authoritatively established by French Prof. Luc Montagnier who recently disclosed the results of his laboratory analysis of the virus genome. He found it to be laced with spliced-in HIV sequences, which effectively excludes the possibility of its being the product of a natural process. (Prof. Montaigner put it extremely delicately: “in fact, part of the virus, not the whole, has been manipulated”.) Was it manipulated by bats in some Chinese caves? Prof. Montaigner, incidentally, is eminently qualified to speak on the subject as he was in 2008 a recipient of the Nobel Prize in medicine for identifying the HIV virus. The fact that as soon as he let the cat out of the bag he became subjected to harsh denunciation (here and here) by all the right circles lends powerful support to the credibility of his findings.
Essentially the same conclusions were reached even earlier, in February, by a group of Indian scientists and published in a paper entitled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HI,V-1 gp120 and Gag”. Reassuringly, under ferocious pressure and ridicule by fake news commissars (and here), the scientists were compelled to withdraw their bold paper, because it appeared to have crossed the line of permissible Corona virus discourse even before Prof. Montaigner came out with his assertions. All the more reason to pay serious attention to the glaringly obvious and undeniably significant implications of these fully congruent findings.
Underlining the fact that we have been plunged, without consent and mostly without awareness, into a post-truth world, facts have largely been supplanted by narratives. And narratives are essentially politically convenient fairy tales that nobody sincerely believes but practically everyone must publicly adhere to in order to hold on to what little reputation and dwindling benefits they’ve got left. Team player adherence to public lies (sorry, fairy tales) is a test of good global citizenship. It is a test that to their moral credit the French professor and the Indian researchers have obviously and perhaps to their lasting professional detriment – failed.
Fortunately, the ranks of non-team players in the Corona virus controversy, with all the lurking personal perils that poses, have actually been growing, rather than shrinking.
We are indebted to Dr. Shiva Ayadurai, a brave Indian-American scientist, for making us aware that immunological deficiency is the principal condition propitiating the spread of the Corona virus and that mass lockdowns, causing sun and vitamin deprivation, as well as depression and other debilitating psychological conditions, has the effect of increasing instead of reducing the immunological vulnerability of the human organism.
Another scientist with impeccable credentials, Dr Rashid Buttar, has argued compellingly that the prevalent Corona virus narrative does not add up. Predictably, this non-team player has also been subjected to brutal media assaults and his public statements have provoked the fury of the political correctness commissariat. In Dr Buttar’s view, anyone who is supporting the use of vaccination to combat COVID-19 is either ignorant or has some hidden agenda or is financially motivated. The basic fundamentals of how the human body works are, he argues, ignored and in the process, and while ostensibly treating patients infected by the virus, basic neurological, physical, virological and medical principles are being violated or simply put aside. Not without reason, Dr Buttar points out that people with expert knowledge are silent either because of social pressures or fear of losing their license.
The concerted effort to blot out every opinion, no matter how qualified, which does not conform to the narrative, on the specious pretext that it “violates YouTube’s terms of service” or the mysteriously undefined “community guidelines,” is undoubtedly the most persuasive indication of the narrative’s extreme fragility. While some competent critiques still manage to squeak through the “bodyguard of lies” (here, here, and here), all the algorithms have been activated to keep non-conforming, question and doubt-provoking opinions off the table and out of the purview of the immature and irresponsible masses.
So to return to the paraphrase of Dame Rebecca West, what is going on? What is the meta-script (as Israel Shamir has coyly put it) behind this impressive global production? The dark intimations that in “elite” circles there may be an intense interest in reducing the excessive number of useless eaters to a smaller and more docile cohort of helot-like servants are not without empirical basis. Why the fanatical insistence on mass vaccination on a global scale, for our own good of course, although the concept would not even pass the scrutiny of an alert high school biology student, who is well aware that vaccination does not work for prospective or mutated new viruses? Or are we all expected now to fall prey precisely to Covid-19 and be vaccinated willy-nilly against its ravages? On whose authority are wealthy private individuals with no medical training but close financial ties to the pharmacological industry announcing public health policy measures and determining the particulars and duration of their application? What arcane foreknowledge enabled them to presciently predict the current pandemic several years ago and then suspiciously again, last year several months in advance of its appearance? May the health and welfare of billions of human beings be safely entrusted to self-proclaimed “philanthropists” whose actions are driven entirely by the profit motive, in its various financial, ideological, and perhaps even occult forms? Will billions of people succumb to a corporate media induced mass hysteria and allow profit-making unknown substances to be injected into their bodies, in complete disregard of the fact that on previous occasions similar forms of “relief” had wrought devastation and havoc throughout Asia and Africa, and wherever else they had been administered?
Humanity has good reason to fear and tremble, not so much at the dreaded disease as at its potentially terrifying cure, which we are told is in the making (perhaps in the same laboratories where the disease was concocted) and undoubtedly will soon be unveiled.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR The author in his own words: "My background is Serbian, Russian, and Polish. On my father’s side I have been able to trace family roots to the town of Khmelita, Smolensk district. In the first half of the 19th century Yuri Karganovich held the by then probably obsolete office of стольник (stolnik) in the regional town of Iskorosten. Perhaps because of my ethnically ecumenical background, I prefer to identify myself simply as an Orthodox Christian. I am a law school graduate, also with a degree in philosophy. I have never engaged in political activities as such. What interests me are issues with a moral dimension, and if they also happen to impinge upon politics, so be it."
Puke if you must
This bloodsoaked monster is probably the most evil person on planet earth https://t.co/nGq2H1EPHt — Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) April 9, 2020


thegreanvillepostbiasrating--2020-04-28--It Can’t Happen Here? The Roots Run Deep!

BE SURE TO PASS THESE ARTICLES TO FRIENDS AND KIN .
A LOT DEPENDS ON THIS .
DO YOUR PART . ]
inclair Lewis wrote an important novel in 1935 , It Ca n't Happen Here .
In the fictitious book , based on the threats at the time of fascism taking root in the USA , we see how this virus spread .
As with Philip Roth 's 2004 novel The Plot Against America we see how Charles Lindbergh 's leadership in the America First movement of the 1930s planted the seed for what has NEVER subsided .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fascist mindset that resonates well today in 2020 Make Amerika Great Again ( for the super rich ! )
Sadly , nothing ever real changes in the minds of some people ... only the faces .
In David Talbot 's 2007 study of the Kennedy brothers during JFK 's administration , aptly entitled Brothers , we see the forces of Proto Fascism at work .
JFK inherited the Joints Chiefs of Staff from the Eisenhower administration , with General Curtis LeMay and General Lemnitzer leading the way for a pre-emptive nuclear attack on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us what those in the ' Know ' knew since our U-2 flights over the Soviet Union in the mid to late 1950s : The Soviets were much weaker than us when it came to missile strength .
The Joint Chiefs unanimously recommended such a pre-emptive attack , knowing full well that some of our cities would be severely damaged as we totally destroyed their entire country .
JFK is said to have walked out of that meeting , saying to someone with him `` Those guys are really crazy ! ''
What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than three years of JFK 's presidency , was a far right wing movement to infiltrate our military .
This revealed itself to the leadership in the field by many ' Born Again Commie Haters ' like General Lucius Clay , hero of WW2 and the 1948-49 Berlin Blockade .
In October of 1961 , as Talbot tells us , General Clay precipitated a nerve wracking confrontation with the Soviets at the Berlin Wall .
Our tanks and their tanks stood facing each other like the ' Gunfight at the OK Corral ' @ @ @ @ @ @ @ **** would hit the fan , JFK , through a back channel arrangement his brother Bob had with the Russians , got the other side to agree to a mutual withdrawal .
Meanwhile , far right wing forces here at home , like the John Birch Society , had been calling Eisenhower , hero of WW2 , a `` Dedicated , conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy '' .
Men like ' Off the reservation ' Major General Edwin Walker announced on many occasions that the JFK administration was stocked with `` No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Throughout our domestic and foreign US military bases leaflets and films were offered to our personnel on a regular basis , ALL sounding the trumpet for a final war with the godless Soviets .
When Arkansas Senator Fulbright took to the Senate floor to contradict far right wing forces like South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond , the other side called for hearings when General Walker was relieved of his command in Europe .
Things got testy , especially when Defense Sec .
McNamara was called to testify .
Dozens of white suburban @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and joined 250 spectators in booing him .
Years before those aforementioned hearings , Senator Fulbright , in one of his speeches on the Senate floor , warned of a future ' Military Coup ' ... Is n't that what happened in November of '63 ?
Had n't the French right wing generals attempted something like that earlier in 1961 against De Gaulle 's plans to grant Algeria its independence ?
Few students of our jaded political history recall what happened a year later , in 1962 , when Vice President Lyndon Johnson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was there to support the Democratic Party candidates for the upcoming midterm elections .
Johnson and his wife were attacked , once again by white suburban women , calling him and his wife , and JFK ' Nigger Lovers and Commie Lovers ' .
It is said that Johnson and his wife had to be ' spirited out ' of the hotel they were staying in , as if they were fugitives from a chain gang .
Now we are in the middle ( beginning ?
I pray not ) of a terrible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the health of millions , especially the elderly and infirm .
What needs to be understood is what history reveals when right wing movements gain momentum during tough times , as with Germany during their terrible economic depression in the 1920s and early 30s .
Why ?
Because right wing movements always find scapegoats to satisfy the rage of the many .
We are already seeing this administration , and those who believe in Trump 's convoluted logic , pushing to reopen our nation 's businesses .
Yet , because of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by him and his administration , NOTHING EFFECTIVE was begun during January , February and parts of March .
No stocking or manufacturing of masks , ventilators , hand sanitizers ; NO sending of federal funds to strengthen our hospital systems and first providers ; NO quarantine efforts and shutdowns in the early stages of this Pandemic USA .
All of the above are reasons why this economy has NOT been reopened by now .
Imagine if Trump acted as the Chinese did , and jumped all over the spread of this virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So , his base , the ones demanding a totally OPEN economy , may very well march in lockstep as this Proto Fascist movement strengthens .
My fears , as a student of history , are REAL !
We have a possible Army of citizens who may be easily influenced to join such a demagogue led movement .
The anger and the frustration of many out of work and out of bread ( the kind you eat AND the kind you spend ) people can be the very fodder used by the actual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
As with Germany in the late 1920s , and with Amerika just a few short years ago , frustrated and angry working stiffs got directed to go against their economic interests by propaganda masters .
They blamed ' Big Government ' and supported the super rich who controlled government for their own selfish interests .
We who ' Know better ' need to influence our fellow working stiffs about what we all not only need , but deserve !
And it sure ai n't Fascism !

BE SURE TO PASS THESE ARTICLES TO FRIENDS AND KIN. A LOT DEPENDS ON THIS. DO YOUR PART.
Philip Farruggio OpEds
SINclair Lewis wrote an important novel in 1935, It Can't Happen Here. In the fictitious book, based on the threats at the time of fascism taking root in the USA, we see how this virus spread. As with Philip Roth's 2004 novel The Plot Against America we see how Charles Lindbergh's leadership in the America First movement of the 1930s planted the seed for what has NEVER subsided. That being simply the growth of a Proto Fascist mindset that resonates well today in 2020 Make Amerika Great Again ( for the super rich! ) Sadly, nothing ever real changes in the minds of some people... only the faces.
In David Talbot's 2007 study of the Kennedy brothers during JFK's administration, aptly entitled Brothers, we see the forces of Proto Fascism at work. JFK inherited the Joints Chiefs of Staff from the Eisenhower administration, with General Curtis LeMay and General Lemnitzer leading the way for a pre-emptive nuclear attack on the Soviet Union. History now tells us what those in the ' Know' knew since our U-2 flights over the Soviet Union in the mid to late 1950s: The Soviets were much weaker than us when it came to missile strength. The Joint Chiefs unanimously recommended such a pre-emptive attack, knowing full well that some of our cities would be severely damaged as we totally destroyed their entire country. JFK is said to have walked out of that meeting, saying to someone with him " Those guys are really crazy!"
What was also going on during those less than three years of JFK's presidency, was a far right wing movement to infiltrate our military. This revealed itself to the leadership in the field by many ' Born Again Commie Haters' like General Lucius Clay, hero of WW2 and the 1948-49 Berlin Blockade. In October of 1961, as Talbot tells us, General Clay precipitated a nerve wracking confrontation with the Soviets at the Berlin Wall. Our tanks and their tanks stood facing each other like the ' Gunfight at the OK Corral' of western lore. Right before the **** would hit the fan, JFK, through a back channel arrangement his brother Bob had with the Russians, got the other side to agree to a mutual withdrawal. Meanwhile, far right wing forces here at home, like the John Birch Society, had been calling Eisenhower, hero of WW2, a " Dedicated , conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy". Men like ' Off the reservation' Major General Edwin Walker announced on many occasions that the JFK administration was stocked with "No win Ivy Leaguers and confirmed Communists".
Throughout our domestic and foreign US military bases leaflets and films were offered to our personnel on a regular basis, ALL sounding the trumpet for a final war with the godless Soviets. When Arkansas Senator Fulbright took to the Senate floor to contradict far right wing forces like South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, the other side called for hearings when General Walker was relieved of his command in Europe. Things got testy, especially when Defense Sec. McNamara was called to testify. Dozens of white suburban housewives wearing Stop Communism tags swarmed him and joined 250 spectators in booing him.
Years before those aforementioned hearings, Senator Fulbright, in one of his speeches on the Senate floor, warned of a future ' Military Coup' ... Isn't that what happened in November of '63? Hadn't the French right wing generals attempted something like that earlier in 1961 against De Gaulle's plans to grant Algeria its independence? Few students of our jaded political history recall what happened a year later, in 1962, when Vice President Lyndon Johnson visited Dallas with his wife. He was there to support the Democratic Party candidates for the upcoming midterm elections. Johnson and his wife were attacked , once again by white suburban women, calling him and his wife, and JFK ' Nigger Lovers and Commie Lovers' . It is said that Johnson and his wife had to be ' spirited out ' of the hotel they were staying in, as if they were fugitives from a chain gang.
Now we are in the middle ( beginning? I pray not) of a terrible pandemic. It threatens our economy along with the health of millions, especially the elderly and infirm. What needs to be understood is what history reveals when right wing movements gain momentum during tough times, as with Germany during their terrible economic depression in the 1920s and early 30s. Why? Because right wing movements always find scapegoats to satisfy the rage of the many. We are already seeing this administration, and those who believe in Trump's convoluted logic, pushing to reopen our nation's businesses. Yet, because of the utter incompetence and ' Pandemic denial ' by him and his administration, NOTHING EFFECTIVE was begun during January, February and parts of March. No stocking or manufacturing of masks, ventilators, hand sanitizers; NO sending of federal funds to strengthen our hospital systems and first providers; NO quarantine efforts and shutdowns in the early stages of this Pandemic USA . All of the above are reasons why this economy has NOT been reopened by now. Imagine if Trump acted as the Chinese did, and jumped all over the spread of this virus early on. He didn't! So, his base, the ones demanding a totally OPEN economy, may very well march in lockstep as this Proto Fascist movement strengthens.
My fears, as a student of history, are REAL! We have a possible Army of citizens who may be easily influenced to join such a demagogue led movement. The anger and the frustration of many out of work and out of bread ( the kind you eat AND the kind you spend) people can be the very fodder used by the actual super rich who helped create such movements. As with Germany in the late 1920s, and with Amerika just a few short years ago, frustrated and angry working stiffs got directed to go against their economic interests by propaganda masters. They blamed ' Big Government' and supported the super rich who controlled government for their own selfish interests. We who ' Know better' need to influence our fellow working stiffs about what we all not only need, but deserve! And it sure ain't Fascism!
PA Farruggio
April 2020


thegreanvillepostbiasrating--2020-04-27--Ukraine’s Opposition Accuses US of Scrubbing Info About Biolabs’ Activities on Ukrainian Territory

We have often referred in these pages to foreign biolabs kept by the US for purposes which are neither widely known in the US nor among the populations of the host nations , often led by corrupt cliques bribed or blackmailed by US intel services .
This article focuses on this hushed up topic , the silence being consciously maintained by the whore Western media and political class , as usual .
We have often referred in these pages to foreign biolabs kept by the US for purposes which are neither widely known in the US nor among the populations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by corrupt cliques bribed or blackmailed by US intel services .
This article focuses on this hushed up topic , the silence being consciously maintained by the whore Western media and political class , as usual .
he US Embassy in Kiev has been caught in the center of a brewing political scandal after denying allegations about US biological laboratories ’ “ unlawful activity ” in Ukraine , while admitting that such labs do exist .
The US Embassy in Kiev has scrubbed information about the work of two of its biolabs in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , co-leader of the Opposition Platform – For Life party , has alleged .
According to the lawmaker , in its April 22 statement responding to Rada lawmakers ’ mid-April request for a government investigation into the 15 US biolabs operating on Ukrainian territory , the US Embassy provided a link to an explanation about the operation of its ‘ Biological Threat Reduction Program ’ .
There are two interesting facts associated with the document , Medvedchuk alleges – first , that the webpage was created on April 9 , 2020 , three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a government inquiry , and second , that there are discrepancies between the English and Ukrainian versions of the pages .
“ In other words , in 2017 , the US Embassy not only openly curated at least two level three biolabs , but openly stated this .
This is not proof that there have not been other , more dangerous laboratories , or that these laboratories have not conducted experiments with pathogens presenting the maximum level of danger , but it does indicate a desire by the US Embassy to remove information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Ukraine ’ s Opposition Platform – For Life requested a government probe into the operation of US biolabs in Ukraine on April 15 , claiming that since these labs ’ deployment , Ukraine has faced mysterious outbreaks of otherwise inexplicable dangerous diseases , such as the 2009 outbreak of hemorrhagic pneumonia , the 2011 , 2014 and 2015 cholera outbreaks , and an outbreak of hepatitis A in 2017 .
In early 2016 , at least 20 Ukrainian servicemen were reported to have died from a flu-like virus , with 364 more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ The Ukrainian people have the right to know about secret programs , ” the opposition lawmakers ’ appeal stressed .
In its April 22 reply , the US Embassy accused Opposition Platform MPs of spreading “ disinformation , ” while admitting that a Department of Defence Biological Threat Reduction Program is working “ with the Ukrainian Government to consolidate and secure pathogens and toxins of security concern in Ukrainian government facilities.
” In his comments Monday , Medvedchuk suggested that the alleged creation of a separate level 3 lab for human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ This is the main reason for the creation of US biolabs in Ukraine , serving as an opportunity to carry out the most dangerous kinds of studies , including studies on human beings , which are prohibited under US laws , but allowed in Ukraine , due to problems in Ukrainian legislation , but to a greater extent , to Ukraine ’ s foreign control by the United States , ” he claimed .
The Ukrainian lawmakers ’ allegations aren ’ t the first of their kind .
In 2018 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ security asked President Trump to investigate reports that personnel from the US ’ s Lugar Center biological lab outside Tbilisi had engaged in experimentation on live human test subjects .
In September 2018 , the Russian Foreign Ministry said it had its suspicions about possible US testing of biological weapons in states near Russia ’ s borders , and warned Washington to halt such activities immediately .
In March , Iranian doctors penned a letter to the leaders of Afghanistan , Georgia , Iraq , Kazakhstan , Kyrgyzstan and Pakistan to destroy all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the coronavirus pandemic may have been spread deliberately as a form of biological warfare .
Earlier this month , Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warned Washington that Russia was apprised of US efforts to expand military research at the Lugar Lab , and said that the US has substantially expanded dual purpose biological research at labs across the former Soviet space under the pretext of combating bioterrorism .

We have often referred in these pages to foreign biolabs kept by the US for purposes which are neither widely known in the US nor among the populations of the host nations, often led by corrupt cliques bribed or blackmailed by US intel services. This article focuses on this hushed up topic, the silence being consciously maintained by the whore Western media and political class, as usual.
We have often referred in these pages to foreign biolabs kept by the US for purposes which are neither widely known in the US nor among the populations of the host nations, often led by corrupt cliques bribed or blackmailed by US intel services. This article focuses on this hushed up topic, the silence being consciously maintained by the whore Western media and political class, as usual.
[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he US Embassy in Kiev has been caught in the center of a brewing political scandal after denying allegations about US biological laboratories’ “unlawful activity” in Ukraine, while admitting that such labs do exist.
The US Embassy in Kiev has scrubbed information about the work of two of its biolabs in Ukraine from its website, Viktor Medvedchuk, co-leader of the Opposition Platform – For Life party, has alleged.
According to the lawmaker, in its April 22 statement responding to Rada lawmakers’ mid-April request for a government investigation into the 15 US biolabs operating on Ukrainian territory, the US Embassy provided a link to an explanation about the operation of its ‘Biological Threat Reduction Program’. There are two interesting facts associated with the document, Medvedchuk alleges – first, that the webpage was created on April 9, 2020, three days before lawmakers made their request for a government inquiry, and second, that there are discrepancies between the English and Ukrainian versions of the pages.
“The Ukrainian-language document appeared earlier, but in 2017 featured another version of the document, now deleted, including the text ‘Consolidation of particularly hazardous pathogens in modern biosafety level facilities (one level three biosafety lab for human pathogens and one level three biosafety lab for animal pathogens)’,” Medvedchuk explained in a statement Monday.
“In other words, in 2017, the US Embassy not only openly curated at least two level three biolabs, but openly stated this. This is not proof that there have not been other, more dangerous laboratories, or that these laboratories have not conducted experiments with pathogens presenting the maximum level of danger, but it does indicate a desire by the US Embassy to remove information that compromises them,” Medvedchuk claimed.
Well-known Ukrainian pundit wonders what 15 biolabs funded by the Pentagon are doing in Ukraine. In response to MP’s request for info, the US embassy said this is a matter of safe storage and research. FB post: https://t.co/zetsWPxeJI News article: https://t.co/9AQKpbvCmn pic.twitter.com/Pssc49yPT7 — Nina ☦ Byzantina (@NinaByzantina) April 24, 2020
Ukraine’s Opposition Platform – For Life requested a government probe into the operation of US biolabs in Ukraine on April 15, claiming that since these labs’ deployment, Ukraine has faced mysterious outbreaks of otherwise inexplicable dangerous diseases, such as the 2009 outbreak of hemorrhagic pneumonia, the 2011, 2014 and 2015 cholera outbreaks, and an outbreak of hepatitis A in 2017. In early 2016, at least 20 Ukrainian servicemen were reported to have died from a flu-like virus, with 364 more people succumbing to swine flu months later. “The Ukrainian people have the right to know about secret programs,” the opposition lawmakers’ appeal stressed.
In its April 22 reply, the US Embassy accused Opposition Platform MPs of spreading “disinformation,” while admitting that a Department of Defence Biological Threat Reduction Program is working “with the Ukrainian Government to consolidate and secure pathogens and toxins of security concern in Ukrainian government facilities.”
In his comments Monday, Medvedchuk suggested that the alleged creation of a separate level 3 lab for human pathogens may indicate experimentation on human beings. “This is the main reason for the creation of US biolabs in Ukraine, serving as an opportunity to carry out the most dangerous kinds of studies, including studies on human beings, which are prohibited under US laws, but allowed in Ukraine, due to problems in Ukrainian legislation, but to a greater extent, to Ukraine’s foreign control by the United States,” he claimed.
Shady US Labs Across Post-Soviet Space
The Ukrainian lawmakers’ allegations aren’t the first of their kind. In 2018, Georgia’s former minister of state security asked President Trump to investigate reports that personnel from the US’s Lugar Center biological lab outside Tbilisi had engaged in experimentation on live human test subjects.
In September 2018, the Russian Foreign Ministry said it had its suspicions about possible US testing of biological weapons in states near Russia’s borders, and warned Washington to halt such activities immediately.
In March, Iranian doctors penned a letter to the leaders of Afghanistan, Georgia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Pakistan to destroy all US biololabs in their countries, claiming that the coronavirus pandemic may have been spread deliberately as a form of biological warfare.
Earlier this month, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warned Washington that Russia was apprised of US efforts to expand military research at the Lugar Lab, and said that the US has substantially expanded dual purpose biological research at labs across the former Soviet space under the pretext of combating bioterrorism.


thegreanvillepostbiasrating--2020-04-29--Why the US withdrew its bombers from Guam (Annotated)

n one awkward and still unexplained step , the Pentagon is unnerving allies and friends while potentially harming the US forward deterrent in the Pacific , especially as it applies to China .
The unexplained step was the mid-April withdrawal of strategic bombers from Guam .
While Guam is far from the troubled Taiwan Straits , Okinawa and Japan , and even farther from the South China Sea , it is light years closer than flying combat aircraft from the middle of the US .
Adding a dozen or more hours to the Pentagon ’ s ability to respond to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
US Air Force bombers , including the B-1B Lancer , B-52 Stratofortress and B-2 Spirit , have been operating in Guam since 2004 under the so-called Continuous Bomber Presence program .
The official statement on the pullback of the bomber fleet from Guam has led to a lot of head-scratching .
“ In line with the National Defense Strategy , the United States has transitioned to an approach that enables strategic bombers to operate forward in the Indo-Pacific region from a broader array of overseas locations , when required , and with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are permanently based in the United States , ” the US Air Force Global Strike Command said in a statement .
There are different ways to understand the official statement , although on its face value it is illogical .
Why would the US pull back from bases that have served it effectively for years , only to redeploy them so they can “ operate forward ” from an “ array of overseas locations ” ?
And why pull them all the way back to Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
One theory is that the US base on Guam , which includes Andersen Air Force Base , is vulnerable to missile or bomber attacks from China .
If true , will the US also pull back from Naval Base Guam , the other major base on the island ?
And what about US bases on Okinawa , Japan and Korea ?
Are these bases also vulnerable ?
The short answer is that the build-up of China ’ s military , expansion of its navy , deployment of new strategic bombers , submarines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is shifting the region ’ s balance of power .
But wouldn ’ t the logical response be to strengthen the US military posture in East Asia , instead of yanking bombers back to the US ?
Part of the US Air Force ’ s concern is China ’ s DF-26 missile , sometimes referred to as the “ Guam Killer.
” The DF-26 is said to be capable of hitting targets up to 5,471 kilometers away with nuclear or conventional warheads .
If the DF-26 is the real threat , then the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Guam , where the Covid-19 afflicted US aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt is now berthed .
No such plan has been put forward , at least not yet .
Instead , there is a semi-secret Pentagon plan to reshape the navy by trimming the US aircraft carrier fleet by two , reducing the current 11 carriers to nine .
The remaining nine carriers may still sound like a lot , but carriers are hugely difficult to maintain .
At any given time , four or five carriers are undergoing major maintenance that can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or two years .
Given US strategic responsibilities in the Atlantic , Mediterranean , Persian Gulf and Pacific , and the fact that carriers operate with task forces usually called Carrier Strike Groups and include surface ships and submarines to protect them , taking two carriers out of service also creates a significant redundancy for the other task force vessels .
A Carrier Strike Group consists of a guided-missile cruiser for air defense , 2 LAMPS ( Light Airborne Multipurpose Ships that carry anti-submarine warfare helicopters ) warships and one or two anti-submarine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supported by an undeclared number of nuclear attack submarines .
Carrier Strike Group 5 is based in Yokosuka , Japan , and is part of the US Seventh Fleet .
The Seventh Fleet also has ship components in Sasebo , Japan , and at Apra Harbor , Naval Base Guam .
If US carriers are cut back , will the US maintain its bases in Japan and elsewhere ?
The Marines are also undergoing a major transformation including a downsizing of the number of serving Marines and a change in mission , making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an independent strike force used in an expeditionary mission .
Overall , the rationale for getting rid of two carriers is to save money that can be sunk into buying a new class of small combatants like the European FREMM class frigate .
The FREMM is a joint French and Italian multipurpose frigate built by Armaris of France and Orizzonte Sistemi Navali of Italy , a joint venture between Fincantieri , Italy ’ s main shipbuilder , and Leonardo , Italy ’ s largest defense conglomerate .
FREMM frigates have a sophisticated air @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anti-submarine warfare platforms .
Exactly what the US plans are for a FREMM-type warship is unclear , and exactly why it would be superior to existing platforms such as the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers , has not been explained .
Moreover , adding a new class of warship to the US fleet would seem to overburden the navy with another sophisticated system it would have to support .
At present , the Pentagon plan does not appear to contemplate a move to unmanned semi-submersible vessels or to a new generation of missile defense @ @ @ @ @ @ @ active review .
While the bomber redeployment is an accomplished fact , the navy ’ s plan to cut carriers and build a new class of smaller warships is far from decided .
The plan , now circulating in the Pentagon , is not agreed internally nor has the proposal been tried out on Capitol Hill , which has a strong pro-carrier contingent of legislators .
Given the navy ’ s recent wasteful record of failed programs , including but not confined to the Littoral Combat Ship , the hugely costly Zumwalt class @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Attack Projectile , unlikely deployment for its expensive and unneeded long-range electromagnetic “ supergun ” , the seriously troubled new aircraft carrier designs with questionable catapults and non-functioning aircraft elevators , Congress may not be keen on signing on to yet another project where the strategic rationale is in the best case murky .
Indeed , the FREMM-type frigate program contemplated by the navy sounds like a shipbuilding program to keep navy shipbuilding yards working and not of any strategic value .
Even so , whether Congress acts or doesn ’ t , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and navy , as understood from outside the US , looks like a retreat from current day responsibilities .
From within the US , questions are bound to arise about America ’ s commitment to maintaining forward deterrence while a major potential adversary , China , is building up capabilities and adding impressive technology-based systems to its arsenal .

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]n one awkward and still unexplained step, the Pentagon is unnerving allies and friends while potentially harming the US forward deterrent in the Pacific, especially as it applies to China.
The unexplained step was the mid-April withdrawal of strategic bombers from Guam. While Guam is far from the troubled Taiwan Straits, Okinawa and Japan, and even farther from the South China Sea, it is light years closer than flying combat aircraft from the middle of the US. Adding a dozen or more hours to the Pentagon’s ability to respond to an active threat seems hard to justify.
US Air Force bombers, including the B-1B Lancer, B-52 Stratofortress and B-2 Spirit, have been operating in Guam since 2004 under the so-called Continuous Bomber Presence program. The official statement on the pullback of the bomber fleet from Guam has led to a lot of head-scratching.
"Deterrence" was always a cloak for colonial style warfare. There has never been a real deterrence strategy in the US war department's planning. Carrier task forces are really only useful when there is no competition for airspace or sea space. The US regime is acknowledging in acts that China is no longer a third world nation to kick around from offshore. The nonsense about forward deterrence was always propaganda- and a way to promote arms sales. The present US problem is that unlike in Europe it has no serious military allies in Asia except its base in Korea...There is another unstated problem: the economic collapse in the US may soon force the regime to concentrate much of its military and police effort at home. —Dr. T. P. Wilkinson
“In line with the National Defense Strategy, the United States has transitioned to an approach that enables strategic bombers to operate forward in the Indo-Pacific region from a broader array of overseas locations, when required, and with greater operational resilience, while these bombers are permanently based in the United States,” the US Air Force Global Strike Command said in a statement.
There are different ways to understand the official statement, although on its face value it is illogical. Why would the US pull back from bases that have served it effectively for years, only to redeploy them so they can “operate forward” from an “array of overseas locations”?And why pull them all the way back to Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota and not to nearer by Alaska or Hawaii?
One theory is that the US base on Guam, which includes Andersen Air Force Base, is vulnerable to missile or bomber attacks from China. If true, will the US also pull back from Naval Base Guam, the other major base on the island? And what about US bases on Okinawa, Japan and Korea? Are these bases also vulnerable?
The US partnership in Europe is crumbling...A rapidly growing number of Europeans are beginning to realize that the US presence in Europe is in fact an occupying power. The Atlantic Council is stepping up its propaganda activities. More and more European politicians are being bought to defend the American cause in the mainstream media. —Frans Vandenbosch
The short answer is that the build-up of China’s military, expansion of its navy, deployment of new strategic bombers, submarines, surface combatants and two aircraft carriers is shifting the region’s balance of power. But wouldn’t the logical response be to strengthen the US military posture in East Asia, instead of yanking bombers back to the US?
Part of the US Air Force’s concern is China’s DF-26 missile, sometimes referred to as the “Guam Killer.” The DF-26 is said to be capable of hitting targets up to 5,471 kilometers away with nuclear or conventional warheads.
If the DF-26 is the real threat, then the next step should be closing Naval base Guam, where the Covid-19 afflicted US aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt is now berthed. No such plan has been put forward, at least not yet.
During the last few years, there had been numerous complaints from the US about Chinese research ships (info and intel gathering ships) in the vicinity of Guam (actually all around Guam). China said STFU, it's the fcking open ocean, their ships were doing marine research, and that was that. The suspicion is that China is setting up ubiquitous sensors (I know of people working on these ideas twenty years ago) so that the base can't make a fart without the PLA knowing (now that they have the Beidou and other spy satellites). The sensors will also catch US subs in the area. These sensors are stealthy and hard to detect. They can obviously turn the base into a big fat stationary target. Tactical retreat is wisely acknowledging the threat. As for aircraft carrier groups, they are indeed used to bully small countries that cannot defend themselves. China probably already has many ways to incapacitate the carrier at select battlefields, not sink it. In these day and age, all you need is a network of sensors, smart mines or smart drones to damage the propellers of the behemoth, and you'll have a sitting duck. This is only the simplest and cheapest solution. There are others, such as sending a drone swarm to damage the deck so that planes can't take off or land. This kind of asymmetric jujitsu is infuriating but that's how I would defend myself if I was China.—Peter Man
Instead, there is a semi-secret Pentagon plan to reshape the navy by trimming the US aircraft carrier fleet by two, reducing the current 11 carriers to nine. The remaining nine carriers may still sound like a lot, but carriers are hugely difficult to maintain. At any given time, four or five carriers are undergoing major maintenance that can keep them out of service for one or two years.
Given US strategic responsibilities in the Atlantic, Mediterranean, Persian Gulf and Pacific, and the fact that carriers operate with task forces usually called Carrier Strike Groups and include surface ships and submarines to protect them, taking two carriers out of service also creates a significant redundancy for the other task force vessels.
A Carrier Strike Group consists of a guided-missile cruiser for air defense, 2 LAMPS (Light Airborne Multipurpose Ships that carry anti-submarine warfare helicopters) warships and one or two anti-submarine destroyers. The Strike Group is also supported by an undeclared number of nuclear attack submarines.
A variant of the Carrier Strike Group is an Expeditionary Strike Group that consists of an aircraft carrier and “an amphibious assault ship, a dock landing ship (LSD), an amphibious transport dock, a Marine expeditionary unit, AV-8B Harrier II or, more recently, Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II aircraft, CH-53E Super Stallion and CH-46E Sea Knight helicopters or, more recently, MV-22B tiltrotors, cruisers, destroyers and attack submarines.”
Carrier Strike Group 5 is based in Yokosuka, Japan, and is part of the US Seventh Fleet. The Seventh Fleet also has ship components in Sasebo, Japan, and at Apra Harbor, Naval Base Guam. If US carriers are cut back, will the US maintain its bases in Japan and elsewhere?
The Marines are also undergoing a major transformation including a downsizing of the number of serving Marines and a change in mission, making them more a US Navy adjunct than an independent strike force used in an expeditionary mission.
Overall, the rationale for getting rid of two carriers is to save money that can be sunk into buying a new class of small combatants like the European FREMM class frigate.
The FREMM is a joint French and Italian multipurpose frigate built by Armaris of France and Orizzonte Sistemi Navali of Italy, a joint venture between Fincantieri, Italy’s main shipbuilder, and Leonardo, Italy’s largest defense conglomerate.
FREMM frigates have a sophisticated air defense capability and can be used as anti-submarine warfare platforms. Exactly what the US plans are for a FREMM-type warship is unclear, and exactly why it would be superior to existing platforms such as the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers, has not been explained.
Moreover, adding a new class of warship to the US fleet would seem to overburden the navy with another sophisticated system it would have to support. At present, the Pentagon plan does not appear to contemplate a move to unmanned semi-submersible vessels or to a new generation of missile defense systems, although unmanned platforms are under active review.
While the bomber redeployment is an accomplished fact, the navy’s plan to cut carriers and build a new class of smaller warships is far from decided. The plan, now circulating in the Pentagon, is not agreed internally nor has the proposal been tried out on Capitol Hill, which has a strong pro-carrier contingent of legislators.
Peter wrote about methods of attacking carrier battle groups:
In these day and age, all you need is a network of sensors, smart mines or smart drones to damage the propellers of the behemoth, and you'll have a sitting duck. This is only the simplest and cheapest solution. Thanks Peter, I seriously distrust the Asia Times these days, but this article does point out some under-discussed possibilities. Observe an aircraft carrier sailing the Malacca straits, heavily laden with newly replenished with stores loaded in Singapore. It leaves a long mud trail behind the ship, far back to the horizon. The mud trail tells us that the ship's keel is only a few feet from the sea bed. In the Persian Gulf and elsewhere, oil and gas wells have been routinely drilled horizontally for 10km or more for many years. I often wonder whether such off-the-self technology has been deployed to mine the actual sea bed in certain strategic sea lanes. I also know from direct experience that detonating a mere 100kg of C4 explosive at the sea bed, can damage the hull of a ship floating overhead. Hundreds of meters of 13-3/8" well casing set horizontally under the seabed could hold a thousand tons of C4. The shock from such an explosion would kill most of the crew on any passing ship - and wreck the hull beyond repair. Well understood technical possibilities such as this, and dozens of others, must render the 20th century capital warship obsolete.—Evan Jones
Given the navy’s recent wasteful record of failed programs, including but not confined to the Littoral Combat Ship, the hugely costly Zumwalt class destroyers, the failed Long Range Land Attack Projectile, unlikely deployment for its expensive and unneeded long-range electromagnetic “supergun”, the seriously troubled new aircraft carrier designs with questionable catapults and non-functioning aircraft elevators, Congress may not be keen on signing on to yet another project where the strategic rationale is in the best case murky.
Indeed, the FREMM-type frigate program contemplated by the navy sounds like a shipbuilding program to keep navy shipbuilding yards working and not of any strategic value. Even so, whether Congress acts or doesn’t, the posture of both the air force and navy, as understood from outside the US, looks like a retreat from current day responsibilities.
From within the US, questions are bound to arise about America’s commitment to maintaining forward deterrence while a major potential adversary, China, is building up capabilities and adding impressive technology-based systems to its arsenal.


thegreanvillepostbiasrating--2020-04-28--America’s enemy is England, not Russia. Historically, Russia has been perhaps America’s main Ally; E

America ’ s second war against a foreign power was the War of 1812 ( 1812-1815 ) , in which the U.S.A. , so soon after its own victorious Revolution to free itself from Britain , tried to go even further , and to remove Britain altogether from North America .
There still remained , among Americans , some fear that England might try to retake the U.S.A .
The historian , Don Hickey , wrote that “ In North America , the United States was the only belligerent that could lose the war and still retain its independence .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ at stake in the Napoleonic Wars , one might argue that the United States was the only belligerent on either side of the Atlantic in the War of 1812 that had nothing to fear for its independence.
” Because King George III was still hated by many Americans , the U.S. aimed to free from Britain ’ s control the British colonies that remained to the north of America ’ s border , present-day Canada .
Most of the residents there , however , continued to think of themselves as subjects of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failed .
Furthermore , British soldiers , coming down from what now is Canada , actually did manage to to jeopardize America ’ s independence : they burned down Washington .
It wasn ’ t the King ’ s subjects north of America ’ s border who did this ; it was British troops .
The King ’ s army did it .
Americans did have real reason to fear King George III .
America ’ s continuing independence was , indeed , at stake in that war .
That wasn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jefferson ’ s Party ) ; there was reality to it .
During a 25 May 2018 phone-call between the Presidents of America and Canada , America ’ s ignoramus President — Donald Trump — justified tariffs against Canada partially by saying “ Didn ’ t you guys burn down the White House ?
” However , King George III ’ s troops had actually done that , on 24 August 1814 ( and destroyed the Capitol building on the same day ) ; and not only did Canada not yet exist at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s troops had done this in retaliation for a successful American invasion into the King ’ s northern territory — which territory was subsequently to win its own partial independence ( after the unsuccessful rebellions of 1837-1838 , by the King ’ s subjects there ) .
Though the U.S. won the War of 1812 , in the sense of not losing its independence to England , it failed to free Canada .
However , two years after America ’ s own Civil War ( 1860-1865 ) , Canada finally won a messy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the British-destroyed U.S. White House was completed in 1817 ; that of the British-destroyed U.S. Capitol was completed in 1826 .
The most celebrated battle in the War of 1812 was at Baltimore ’ s Fort McHenry , on 13 September 1814 , where America ’ s soldiers hoisted in victory the U.S. flag , which inspired Francis Scott Key to write “ The Star-Spangled Banner ” .
That ode was celebrating what became considered by Americans to have been their country ’ s second victory against Britain ’ s imperial tyranny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to conquer the U.S. was during the Civil War , when England was supporting the Southerners ’ right to continue enslaving Blacks and to break away from the federal Union for that purpose ( to perpetuate slavery ) .
If the South had won , this would not only have considerably weakened the U.S.A. , but it would have placed to America ’ s south a new nation which would be allied with America ’ s enemy , Britain , the Southern Confederacy .
By contrast against England ’ s support for slavery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United States , Russia was a leading global supporter of the U.S. , and of its movement to abolish slavery .
Under Tsar Alexander II , the Russian Government opposed not only slavery but also serfdom , and thus became immortalized amongst Russians as “ The Great Liberator , ” for his ending serfdom , which was , for Russia , what slavery was for America — a repudiated relic of a former monarchic absolutism ( that Tsar ’ s predecessors ) .
When the erudite Cynthia Chung headlined on 16 October 2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : The Forgotten History of a Brotherhood ” and wrote there about “ Cassius Clay , ” she wasn ’ t mistakenly referring to the famous American boxer Muhammad Ali ( 1942-2016 ) , but instead , quite correctly , to the individual who is far less well-known today but in whose honor that renowned boxer had originally been named , Cassius Marcellus Clay .
The namesake for that boxer was quite reasonably referred-to by Chung as having been “ possibly the greatest US Ambassador to Russia ( 1861-1862 and 1863-1869 ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , indeed , one of America ’ s unsung historical heroes , not only because this Kentuckian “ Cassius Clay ” was an extremely courageous champion of outlawing slavery , but also because he became a great asset to his friend Abraham Lincoln ’ s war to achieve the goal of emancipating America ’ s slaves .
As Wikipedia ’ s article “ Cassius Marcellus Clay ( politician ) ” says , when describing Clay ’ s role in the “ Civil War and Minister to Russia ” : President Lincoln appointed Clay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russian court at St. Petersburg on March 28 , 1861 .
The Civil War started before he departed and , as there were no Federal troops in Washington at the time , Clay organized a group of 300 volunteers to protect the White House and US Naval Yard from a possible Confederate attack .
These men became known as Cassius M. Clay ’ s Washington Guards .
President Lincoln gave Clay a presentation Colt revolver in recognition .
When Federal troops arrived , Clay and his family embarked for Russia .
[ 10 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ witnessed the Tsar ’ s emancipation edict .
Recalled to the United States in 1862 to accept a commission from Lincoln as a major general with the Union Army , Clay publicly refused to accept it unless Lincoln would agree to emancipate slaves under Confederate control .
Lincoln sent Clay to Kentucky to assess the mood for emancipation there and in the other border states .
Following Clay ’ s return to Washington , DC , Lincoln issued the proclamation in late 1862 , to take effect in January 1863 .
[ 11 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1863 and returned to Russia , where he served until 1869 .
[ 3 ] He was influential in the negotiations for the purchase of Alaska .
[ 12 Thus , this friend of both “ The Great Liberator ” and “ The Great Emancipator ” helped them both .
As Blake Stillwell well summarized in his 16 October 2015 article “ How Russia guaranteed a Union victory in the Civil War ” , Ambassador Clay knew and personally shared the deeply shared values between the heads-of-state in both the U.S. and Russia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ II to commit to join the U.S. in a war to conquer England if England would overtly and actively join the U.S. South ’ s war against the United States .
Tsar Alexander II thus stationed Russian warships in New York City and San Francisco during the Civil War , so as to block England from actively supporting the Southern Confederacy , which England had been planning to do .
Probably no single country was as helpful to the Union cause as was Russia , and this was not merely for purposes of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and progressive principles , both Lincoln ’ s and that Tsar ’ s — their shared Enlightenment goals for the world ’ s future .
Imperialistic England ’ s imperialistic foe France was also pro-slavery , but not as big a threat to the U.S. as England was .
The way that Michael O ’ Neill phrased this in his 10 May 2019 “ France ’ s Involvement in the U.S. Civil War ” was : “ The French government certainly had sympathies for the Confederacy because both regimes were aristocratic , while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and economic system that wasn ’ t as rigidly hierarchical .
France ’ s trade prospects were also hurt because of Northern blockades of Southern ports .
France wanted to intervene in order to ensure the trade of cotton , wine , brandy and silk.
” This was an instance where the English and French empires were on the same side — against democracy , and for slavery .
Every aristocracy is driven by unlimited greed , and this greed drove the French and English aristocracies together , regarding America ’ s Civil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extremely rare progressive aristocrat — like U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt subsequently also was .
As Chung ’ s article also noted , the friendly relations between Russia and the United States had started at the time of the American Revolution , and Benjamin Franklin ( who then was America ’ s Ambassador to France ) was key to that .
In 1877 , the future British diamond-magnate Cecil Rhodes came up with his lifelong plan , to unite the aristocracies of Britain and the U.S. so as to ultimately conquer the entire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ activated upon his death , which occurred in 1902 , when the Rhodes Trust began and created the core of a spreading movement at the top levels of finance in both countries , including the Royal Institute of Foreign Affairs , a.k.a.
, Chatham House , in London , and then the Council on Foreign Relations in NYC ( RIFA ’ s U.S. branch ) , both of which institutions became united with the European aristocracies in the Bilderberg group , which started in 1954 , and which was initiated by the ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and David Rockefeller of U.S. ; and , then , finally , the Trilateral Commission , bringing Japan ’ s aristocrats into the Rhodesian fold , in 1973 , under the aegis of David Rockefeller ’ s agent and chief anti-Russian strategist , Zbigniew Brzezinski .
( Nelson Rockefeller ’ s chief anti-Russian strategist was Henry Kissinger . )
There are also other significant offshoots from the Rhodes Trust — it ’ s the trunk of the tree , and Cecil Rhodes seems to have been its seed .
Then , during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russia were , yet again , crucial allies , but this time England was with us , not against us , because Britain ’ s aristocracy were competing against Germany ’ s .
The Marxist Revolution in Russia in 1917 terrified all of the world ’ s super-rich , much as they had been terrified by America ’ s enemy is England , not Russia .
Historically , Russia has been perhaps America ’ s main Ally ; England remains America ’ s top enemy , just as during the American Revolution.the failed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this in Russia was a revolution for a dictatorship by workers against the middle class ( “ the bourgeoisie ” ) and not only against the aristocracy ; and , so , it was no Enlightenment project , and it certainly wasn ’ t at all democratic .
Furthermore , Germany during World War I was even more dictatorial than was England .
Indeed : Kaiser Wilhelm II initiated the World War in order to maintain and continue the ancient tradition of the divine right of kings — hereditary monarchy ( the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , hereditary rule ) .
And Germany was threatening America ’ s ships , whereas England was not .
At the Versaille Peace Conference after WW I , four influential leaders of the U.S. delegation were intensely pro-British : the extremely conservative pro-aristocracy Democrat and U.S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing , and his two nephews , the extremely conservative devoutly Christian pro-aristocracy Republicans John Foster Dulles , and his brother Allen Dulles , and the devoutly Christian partner of J.P. Morgan , Thomas Lamont .
All four supported an obligation by Germany @ @ @ @ @ @ @ French taxpayers so large as to destitute the newly established democratic Weimar German Government .
This destitution of Germans — approved by the U.S. delegation — helped to cause the extremist conservative right-wing-populist Nazi Party to come into power against the democratic Weimar Government .
The Dulles brothers had many friends amongst the aristocracies of both England and Germany , and became two leaders of the war to conquer Russia , under U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower .
Whereas U.S. President Harry S. Truman had sought to “ contain ” the Soviet Union , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conquer ” it .
Both of them had a visceral hatred of Russia — not only of communism .
It was a hatred which was widely shared amongst the aristocracies of all empires , especially England , U.S. , Germany , and Japan .
U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an exception to the almost universal hatred of Russia amongst U.S.-and-allied aristocracies : he recognized and acknowledged that though Joseph Stalin was a barbaric dictator , Stalin was a deeply committed anti-imperialist like FDR himself was , because Stalin led the Communist Party @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s imperialist wing .
Stalin advocated passionately for “ communism in one country ” — the doctrine that the Soviet Union must first clearly establish a thriving economy within the country and thereby serve as a model which would inspire the masses in capitalist nations to rise up against their oppressors ; and that only after such a communist model of success becomes established can communism naturally spread to other countries .
FDR was absolutely opposed to any sort of imperialism , and he had passionate private arguments against Winston Churchill about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There can be no tampering with the Empire ’ s economic agreements , ” in reply to FDR ’ s “ I can ’ t believe that we can fight a war against fascist slavery , and at the same time not work to free people all over the world from a backward colonial policy.
” And , afterwards , FDR said privately to his son Elliott , contemptuously against Churchill , “ A real old Tory , isn ’ t he ?
A real old Tory , of the old school.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a United Nations which would possess all nuclear and all other strategic weapons , and which would control all aspects of international law , and nothing of intranational law ( except perhaps if the Security Council is unanimous , but only as being exceptions ) .
Each of the major powers would be allowed to intervene intranationally into their bordering nations , but only so as to prevent any inimical major power from gaining a foothold next door — purely defensive , nothing else .
This would have been very different from what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ something that the gullible Truman ( who knew and understood none of that ) was able to be deceived about by Churchill , and , even more so , by the then-General , Dwight Eisenhower , because both of them were committed imperialists and aimed to conquer Russia — and not only to end its communism .
The crucial date was 26 July 1945 , when Eisenhower convinced Truman to start the Cold War .
Then , on 24 February 1990 , U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush established the policy of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Soviet Union would end its communism in 1991 , the U.S. and its allies would secretly continue the Cold War against Russia , until Russia becomes conquered so as to be part of the U.S. empire , no longer an independent nation .
This is continuation of Cecil Rhodes ’ s plan : the U.S. doing the British aristocracy ’ s bidding to lead in conquering the entire world .
On 14 August 1941 , at the time when FDR and Churchill formed the Atlantic Charter and were planning for a joint war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ UKUSA Agreement ” , a “ secret treaty ” between those two countries , which became formalized on 17 May 1943 as the “ BRUSA Agreement ” and then on 5 March 1946 under President Truman became officially signed , and its contents finally became public on 25 June 2010 .
It was/is the basis of what is more commonly know as “ the Five Eyes ” of the Cecil-Rhodes-derived ( though they don ’ t mention that ) foreign-intelligence operations , uniting UK and U.S. intelligence as the core , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other Anglo-Saxon English-speaking colonies : Canada , Australia , and New Zealand .
India and other ‘ inferior races ’ of English-speaking countries ( as Rhodes and Winston Churchill viewed them ) weren ’ t included .
For examples : the UK/USA joint effort to produce the death of Julian Assange ( and seem likely to succeed soon in doing that ) became part of this UK/USA working-together , as have also been the UK/USA sanctions against Russia regarding the trumped-up cases and sanctions against Russia concerning Sergei Magnitsky in 2012 and Sergei @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Donald Trump in 2018 .
This full flowering of the Rhodesian plan is also publicly known as “ the Special Relationship ” and as “ the Anglosphere ” .
It ’ s the U.S. and UK aristocracies , against their own nations — against their own people — but for the essential imperial operations by both U.S. and UK international corporations , which those billionaires control .
This is why all sanctions against Russia are based on lies .
Certainly , it doesn ’ t happen by accident .
At each step @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. and UK aristocracies are working together on these libels — libels against the actual main foreign ally of the U.S. ( UK ’ s aristocracy has always been the main enemy of the UK ’ s public , and also against Russia — and against the American people .
This is entirely consistent with Rhodes ’ s plan , which was to use the U.S. in order to expand Britain ’ s Empire .
That is the history of our times . )
This is the ultimate success of King George III @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a profound betrayal of the intentions of America ’ s Founders , who were passionate anti-imperialists .
And so too was FDR .
But right after WW II , the imperialists ( run by America ’ s billionaires ) took over .

This article is part of an ongoing series of dispatches by historian Eric Zuesse
[dropcap]A[/dropcap]merica’s sole enemy during the Revolutionary War (1775-1783) was England. Ever since being defeated in that war, England (controlled by the British aristocracy) has tried various ways to regain its control over America. The British aristocracy’s latest attempt to regain control over America started in 1877, and continues today, as the two countries’ “Deep State” — comprising not only the lying CIA and the lying MI6, but the entire joint operation of the united aristocracies of Britain and the U.S. These two aristocracies actually constitute the Deep State, and control the top levels of both intelligence agencies, and of both Governments, and prevent democracy in both countries. The aristocracy rules each of them. The 1877 plan was for a unification of the two aristocracies, and for the then-rising new world power, American industry, and its Government, to become controlled by the wealthiest individuals in both countries. Franklin Delano Roosevelt had tried to break the back of that intended global-imperialist combine, but he tragically died before he achieved this goal.
America’s second war against a foreign power was the War of 1812 (1812-1815), in which the U.S.A., so soon after its own victorious Revolution to free itself from Britain, tried to go even further, and to remove Britain altogether from North America. There still remained, among Americans, some fear that England might try to retake the U.S.A. The historian, Don Hickey, wrote that “In North America, the United States was the only belligerent that could lose the war and still retain its independence. Since Great Britain’s independence was at stake in the Napoleonic Wars, one might argue that the United States was the only belligerent on either side of the Atlantic in the War of 1812 that had nothing to fear for its independence.” Because King George III was still hated by many Americans, the U.S. aimed to free from Britain’s control the British colonies that remained to the north of America’s border, present-day Canada. Most of the residents there, however, continued to think of themselves as subjects of the King, and so the U.S. effort failed. Furthermore, British soldiers, coming down from what now is Canada, actually did manage to to jeopardize America’s independence: they burned down Washington. It wasn’t the King’s subjects north of America’s border who did this; it was British troops. The King’s army did it. Americans did have real reason to fear King George III. America’s continuing independence was, indeed, at stake in that war. That wasn’t merely the perception of the Democratic-Republicans (Jefferson’s Party); there was reality to it.
During a 25 May 2018 phone-call between the Presidents of America and Canada, America’s ignoramus President — Donald Trump — justified tariffs against Canada partially by saying “Didn’t you guys burn down the White House?” However, King George III’s troops had actually done that, on 24 August 1814 (and destroyed the Capitol building on the same day); and not only did Canada not yet exist at that time, but the King’s troops had done this in retaliation for a successful American invasion into the King’s northern territory — which territory was subsequently to win its own partial independence (after the unsuccessful rebellions of 1837-1838, by the King’s subjects there). Though the U.S. won the War of 1812, in the sense of not losing its independence to England, it failed to free Canada. However, two years after America’s own Civil War (1860-1865), Canada finally won a messy partial independence in 1867.
The rebuilding of the British-destroyed U.S. White House was completed in 1817; that of the British-destroyed U.S. Capitol was completed in 1826.
The most celebrated battle in the War of 1812 was at Baltimore’s Fort McHenry, on 13 September 1814, where America’s soldiers hoisted in victory the U.S. flag, which inspired Francis Scott Key to write “The Star-Spangled Banner”. That ode was celebrating what became considered by Americans to have been their country’s second victory against Britain’s imperial tyranny.
England’s next big attempt to conquer the U.S. was during the Civil War, when England was supporting the Southerners’ right to continue enslaving Blacks and to break away from the federal Union for that purpose (to perpetuate slavery). If the South had won, this would not only have considerably weakened the U.S.A., but it would have placed to America’s south a new nation which would be allied with America’s enemy, Britain, the Southern Confederacy.
By contrast against England’s support for slavery, and for the breakup of the United States, Russia was a leading global supporter of the U.S., and of its movement to abolish slavery. Under Tsar Alexander II, the Russian Government opposed not only slavery but also serfdom, and thus became immortalized amongst Russians as “The Great Liberator,” for his ending serfdom, which was, for Russia, what slavery was for America — a repudiated relic of a former monarchic absolutism (that Tsar’s predecessors). When the erudite Cynthia Chung headlined on 16 October 2019, “Russia and the United States: The Forgotten History of a Brotherhood” and wrote there about “Cassius Clay,” she wasn’t mistakenly referring to the famous American boxer Muhammad Ali (1942-2016), but instead, quite correctly, to the individual who is far less well-known today but in whose honor that renowned boxer had originally been named, Cassius Marcellus Clay. The namesake for that boxer was quite reasonably referred-to by Chung as having been “possibly the greatest US Ambassador to Russia (1861-1862 and 1863-1869).” This “Cassius Clay” was, indeed, one of America’s unsung historical heroes, not only because this Kentuckian “Cassius Clay” was an extremely courageous champion of outlawing slavery, but also because he became a great asset to his friend Abraham Lincoln’s war to achieve the goal of emancipating America’s slaves. As Wikipedia’s article “Cassius Marcellus Clay (politician)”says, when describing Clay’s role in the “Civil War and Minister to Russia”:
President Lincoln appointed Clay to the post of Minister to the Russian court at St. Petersburg on March 28, 1861. The Civil War started before he departed and, as there were no Federal troops in Washington at the time, Clay organized a group of 300 volunteers to protect the White House and US Naval Yard from a possible Confederate attack. These men became known as Cassius M. Clay’s Washington Guards. President Lincoln gave Clay a presentation Colt revolver in recognition. When Federal troops arrived, Clay and his family embarked for Russia.[10]
As Minister to Russia, Clay witnessed the Tsar’s emancipation edict. Recalled to the United States in 1862 to accept a commission from Lincoln as a major general with the Union Army, Clay publicly refused to accept it unless Lincoln would agree to emancipate slaves under Confederate control. Lincoln sent Clay to Kentucky to assess the mood for emancipation there and in the other border states. Following Clay’s return to Washington, DC, Lincoln issued the proclamation in late 1862, to take effect in January 1863.[11]
Clay resigned his commission in March 1863 and returned to Russia, where he served until 1869. [3] He was influential in the negotiations for the purchase of Alaska.[12
Thus, this friend of both “The Great Liberator” and “The Great Emancipator” helped them both. As Blake Stillwell well summarized in his 16 October 2015 article “How Russia guaranteed a Union victory in the Civil War”, Ambassador Clay knew and personally shared the deeply shared values between the heads-of-state in both the U.S. and Russia, and he thereby persuaded Tsar Alexander II to commit to join the U.S. in a war to conquer England if England would overtly and actively join the U.S. South’s war against the United States. Tsar Alexander II thus stationed Russian warships in New York City and San Francisco during the Civil War, so as to block England from actively supporting the Southern Confederacy, which England had been planning to do. Probably no single country was as helpful to the Union cause as was Russia, and this was not merely for purposes of power-politics, but very much for democratic and progressive principles, both Lincoln’s and that Tsar’s — their shared Enlightenment goals for the world’s future.
Imperialistic England’s imperialistic foe France was also pro-slavery, but not as big a threat to the U.S. as England was. The way that Michael O’Neill phrased this in his 10 May 2019 “France’s Involvement in the U.S. Civil War” was: “The French government certainly had sympathies for the Confederacy because both regimes were aristocratic, while the North had a more democratic social and economic system that wasn’t as rigidly hierarchical. France’s trade prospects were also hurt because of Northern blockades of Southern ports. France wanted to intervene in order to ensure the trade of cotton, wine, brandy and silk.” This was an instance where the English and French empires were on the same side — against democracy, and for slavery. Every aristocracy is driven by unlimited greed, and this greed drove the French and English aristocracies together, regarding America’s Civil War. Tsar Alexander II was an extremely rare progressive aristocrat — like U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt subsequently also was.
As Chung’s article also noted, the friendly relations between Russia and the United States had started at the time of the American Revolution, and Benjamin Franklin (who then was America’s Ambassador to France) was key to that.
In 1877, the future British diamond-magnate Cecil Rhodes came up with his lifelong plan, to unite the aristocracies of Britain and the U.S. so as to ultimately conquer the entire world. His plan was to be activated upon his death, which occurred in 1902, when the Rhodes Trust began and created the core of a spreading movement at the top levels of finance in both countries, including the Royal Institute of Foreign Affairs, a.k.a., Chatham House, in London, and then the Council on Foreign Relations in NYC (RIFA’s U.S. branch), both of which institutions became united with the European aristocracies in the Bilderberg group, which started in 1954, and which was initiated by the ‘former’ Nazi Prince Bernhard of Netherlands, and David Rockefeller of U.S.; and, then, finally, the Trilateral Commission, bringing Japan’s aristocrats into the Rhodesian fold, in 1973, under the aegis of David Rockefeller’s agent and chief anti-Russian strategist, Zbigniew Brzezinski. (Nelson Rockefeller’s chief anti-Russian strategist was Henry Kissinger.)
There are also other significant offshoots from the Rhodes Trust — it’s the trunk of the tree, and Cecil Rhodes seems to have been its seed.
Then, during World War I, the U.S. and Russia were, yet again, crucial allies, but this time England was with us, not against us, because Britain’s aristocracy were competing against Germany’s. The Marxist Revolution in Russia in 1917 terrified all of the world’s super-rich, much as they had been terrified by America’s enemy is England, not Russia. Historically, Russia has been perhaps America’s main Ally; England remains America’s top enemy, just as during the American Revolution.the failed revolutions in Europe during 1848, but this in Russia was a revolution for a dictatorship by workers against the middle class (“the bourgeoisie”) and not only against the aristocracy; and, so, it was no Enlightenment project, and it certainly wasn’t at all democratic. Furthermore, Germany during World War I was even more dictatorial than was England. Indeed: Kaiser Wilhelm II initiated the World War in order to maintain and continue the ancient tradition of the divine right of kings — hereditary monarchy (the most retrogressive of all forms of governmental rule, hereditary rule). And Germany was threatening America’s ships, whereas England was not.
At the Versaille Peace Conference after WW I, four influential leaders of the U.S. delegation were intensely pro-British: the extremely conservative pro-aristocracy Democrat and U.S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing, and his two nephews, the extremely conservative devoutly Christian pro-aristocracy Republicans John Foster Dulles, and his brother Allen Dulles, and the devoutly Christian partner of J.P. Morgan, Thomas Lamont. All four supported an obligation by Germany’s taxpayers to pay reparations to French taxpayers so large as to destitute the newly established democratic Weimar German Government. This destitution of Germans — approved by the U.S. delegation — helped to cause the extremist conservative right-wing-populist Nazi Party to come into power against the democratic Weimar Government. The Dulles brothers had many friends amongst the aristocracies of both England and Germany, and became two leaders of the war to conquer Russia, under U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower. Whereas U.S. President Harry S. Truman had sought to “contain” the Soviet Union, the Dulles brothers sought instead to “conquer” it. Both of them had a visceral hatred of Russia — not only of communism. It was a hatred which was widely shared amongst the aristocracies of all empires, especially England, U.S., Germany, and Japan.
U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an exception to the almost universal hatred of Russia amongst U.S.-and-allied aristocracies: he recognized and acknowledged that though Joseph Stalin was a barbaric dictator, Stalin was a deeply committed anti-imperialist like FDR himself was, because Stalin led the Communist Party’s anti-imperialist wing, against Trotsky’s imperialist wing. Stalin advocated passionately for “communism in one country” — the doctrine that the Soviet Union must first clearly establish a thriving economy within the country and thereby serve as a model which would inspire the masses in capitalist nations to rise up against their oppressors; and that only after such a communist model of success becomes established can communism naturally spread to other countries. FDR was absolutely opposed to any sort of imperialism, and he had passionate private arguments against Winston Churchill about it, because Churchill said, “There can be no tampering with the Empire’s economic agreements,” in reply to FDR’s “I can’t believe that we can fight a war against fascist slavery, and at the same time not work to free people all over the world from a backward colonial policy.” And, afterwards, FDR said privately to his son Elliott, contemptuously against Churchill, “A real old Tory, isn’t he? A real old Tory, of the old school.” FDR’s post-war vision was for a United Nations which would possess all nuclear and all other strategic weapons, and which would control all aspects of international law, and nothing of intranational law (except perhaps if the Security Council is unanimous, but only as being exceptions). Each of the major powers would be allowed to intervene intranationally into their bordering nations, but only so as to prevent any inimical major power from gaining a foothold next door — purely defensive, nothing else. This would have been very different from what the U.N. became. It’s something that the gullible Truman (who knew and understood none of that) was able to be deceived about by Churchill, and, even more so, by the then-General, Dwight Eisenhower, because both of them were committed imperialists and aimed to conquer Russia — and not only to end its communism. The crucial date was 26 July 1945, when Eisenhower convinced Truman to start the Cold War. Then, on 24 February 1990, U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush established the policy of the U.S. since then: that when the Soviet Union would end its communism in 1991, the U.S. and its allies would secretly continue the Cold War against Russia, until Russia becomes conquered so as to be part of the U.S. empire, no longer an independent nation. This is continuation of Cecil Rhodes’s plan: the U.S. doing the British aristocracy’s bidding to lead in conquering the entire world.
On 14 August 1941, at the time when FDR and Churchill formed the Atlantic Charter and were planning for a joint war against Hitler, they agreed to form the “UKUSA Agreement”, a “secret treaty” between those two countries, which became formalized on 17 May 1943 as the “BRUSA Agreement” and then on 5 March 1946 under President Truman became officially signed, and its contents finally became public on 25 June 2010. It was/is the basis of what is more commonly know as “the Five Eyes” of the Cecil-Rhodes-derived (though they don’t mention that) foreign-intelligence operations, uniting UK and U.S. intelligence as the core, but also including the intelligence-operations of the other Anglo-Saxon English-speaking colonies: Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. India and other ‘inferior races’ of English-speaking countries (as Rhodes and Winston Churchill viewed them) weren’t included. For examples: the UK/USA joint effort to produce the death of Julian Assange (and seem likely to succeed soon in doing that) became part of this UK/USA working-together, as have also been the UK/USA sanctions against Russia regarding the trumped-up cases and sanctions against Russia concerning Sergei Magnitsky in 2012 and Sergei Skripal and the “Russiagate” charges against Donald Trump in 2018. This full flowering of the Rhodesian plan is also publicly known as “the Special Relationship” and as “the Anglosphere”.
It’s the U.S. and UK aristocracies, against their own nations — against their own people — but for the essential imperial operations by both U.S. and UK international corporations, which those billionaires control.
This is why all sanctions against Russia are based on lies. Certainly, it doesn’t happen by accident. At each step, in virtually each instance, the U.S. and UK aristocracies are working together on these libels — libels against the actual main foreign ally of the U.S. (UK’s aristocracy has always been the main enemy of the UK’s public, and also against Russia — and against the American people. This is entirely consistent with Rhodes’s plan, which was to use the U.S. in order to expand Britain’s Empire. That is the history of our times.)
This is the ultimate success of King George III’s plan, and it is a profound betrayal of the intentions of America’s Founders, who were passionate anti-imperialists. And so too was FDR. But right after WW II, the imperialists (run by America’s billionaires) took over.


thegreanvillepostbiasrating--2020-04-29--Douglas Valentine Interview – How The COVID-19 Police State Was Born In Vietnam

^5000The mainstream imperialist media lie CONSTANTLY .
Literally 24/7 .
And it 's getting worse .
All of them do @ @ @ @ @ , the newspapers , the movies .
The internet .
No exceptions .
The corporate @ @ @ @ @ totalitarian .
CBS does it .
NBC does it .
ABC does it .
CNN @ @ @ @ @ it .
NPR does it .
And of course the NYTimes and WaPo do it @ @ @ @ @ '' voices telling you the same lies .
Enough to convince anyone .

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise. Douglas Valentine Interview - How The COVID-19 Police State Was Born In Vietnam The Last American Vagabond This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License Puke if you must This bloodsoaked monster is probably the most evil person on planet earth https://t.co/nGq2H1EPHt — Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) April 9, 2020 • remember: ALL CAPTIONS, IMAGES, PULL QUOTES AND ANNOTATIONS BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHOR— Up to You. ^3000US citizens have no real political representation. We don't live in a democracy. And our freedom is disappearing fast. I don't want to be ruled by hypocrites, whores, and war criminals. What about you? Time to push back against the corporate oligarchy. And its multitude of minions and lackeys.
Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读
[google-translator]
OR you can simply scan our QR code—
THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
OF INTEREST TO OUR READERS
Acclaimed by critics, Ron Ridenour’s incisive history of the struggle between the US and Russia, extending from the Bolshevik revolution to our day, plus a wide-ranging and comprehensive analysis of many cultural America features which continue to bolster the US drive for world domination, is now available in print at a discount price. It’s 564 pages packed with information, many critical but practically unknown facts, and an uncompromising revolutionary perspective on the colossal challenges confronting this generation. (Click here or on the image below to order.)
“Not many people are aware of the extent of the destruction of many Japanese cities which the author details here. He points out that the Soviet Union kept its word to help the United States by its intervention against Japan, the decisive reason why Japan was defeated even before the atomic bombs fell. A stunning but little known fact is that in response to the Russians’ sacrifice the Anglo-American leaders—first Churchill and later Truman— were hatching Operation Unthinkable and Operation Pincher to launch a surprise war against Soviet forces in Europe. These military plots included the potential use of nuclear bombs. This is a book that no well-informed Western reader should be without, especially those inhabiting the homeland of the new empire, the dangerously brainwashed United States.” —(An excerpt from the publisher’s blurb on Amazon).
THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN
The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.
Sign up with TGP so we can always reach you with our vital information. Don’t let the darkness win.
Email First name