inews--2020-05-11--Boris Johnson's Covid-19 lockdown exit plans: mixed reaction from pubs, schools and hairdressers

While many of the stringent restrictions introduced in March will remain in place at least until June , Boris Johnson ’ s decision to begin lifting some of the measures have raised concerns that it is being done too soon .
The Government ’ s plan for reopening schools in England has received a rocky reception from the teaching profession .
Patrick Roach , general secretary of the NASUWT union , told i that aiming for 1 June as the earliest point for a return could “ create confusion if not some degree of chaos ” given uncertainty about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Sarah Cox , a primary teacher in Darlington in County Durham , said she felt “ uneasy about the return to work ” .
With her husband also a key worker , Ms Cox said : “ I just feel like we are massively increasing our risk of catching and transmitting the infection to more vulnerable people.
” However , some teachers were more supportive .
John Licqurish , a teacher at Swanbourne House School - an independent prep school in Buckinghamshire , said he was “ pleased that there is some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ school ” .
“ With three weeks , we should be able to get back in our classrooms safely , ” he added .
Ministers had always called for the construction sector and housebuilders to continue working during the lockdown , as official guidance was for those who could not work from home to carry on .
Federation stating its members are “ planning a gradual return to work , in a structured way that ensures the safety of its workforce , stakeholders and the general public ” .
The sector has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working protocols ” , which were published last night .
Restaurants want more government help ( Photo : Getty ) The hospitality industry has been among the hardest hit by the coronavirus crisis as socialising , particularly indoors , has been completely forbidden during the outbreak .
But Mr Johnson has offered a glimmer of hope to the sector with the suggestion that at least some venues could potentially open in July .
James Ramsden , co-owner of the Michelin-starred Pidgin restaurant in London said : `` The suggestion is , perhaps , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I do n't know , adequate toilet facilities , will be allowed to reopen but there are so many question marks over this that we 're all still very much in limbo.
” Others have been encouraged by the timescale .
Pip Lacey , chef patron at Hicce restaurant , London , said : `` This was more positive news than we were thinking a few weeks ago .
Although it 's all very well to say July but we need rules and guidelines addressed to the industry so we can plan what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , pubs have been taken among the biggest financial impacts from the Covid-19 social distancing measures .
A survey released yesterday revealed that four in 10 pubs - around 19,000 - do not believe they will be able to survive beyond June as many have not been eligible for Government support .
“ Despite this , the Government hasn ’ t outlined any specific additional financial support for pubs to assure and help them through the extended lockdown hardship they face .
We understand that pubs should only open when safe to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offering additional support will be devastating .
”

The publication of the Government’s plan to ease the Covid-19 lockdown has prompted a mixed reaction from different areas of the economy and public sectors.
While many of the stringent restrictions introduced in March will remain in place at least until June, Boris Johnson’s decision to begin lifting some of the measures have raised concerns that it is being done too soon.
Here i looks at the reaction from some of the key sectors of society.
Schools
The Government’s plan for reopening schools in England has received a rocky reception from the teaching profession. Patrick Roach, general secretary of the NASUWT union, told i that aiming for 1 June as the earliest point for a return could “create confusion if not some degree of chaos” given uncertainty about the spread of Covid-19 and schools’ preparedness.
Sarah Cox, a primary teacher in Darlington in County Durham, said she felt “uneasy about the return to work”. With her husband also a key worker, Ms Cox said: “I just feel like we are massively increasing our risk of catching and transmitting the infection to more vulnerable people.”
However, some teachers were more supportive. John Licqurish, a teacher at Swanbourne House School – an independent prep school in Buckinghamshire, said he was “pleased that there is some movement towards getting the children back to school”. “With three weeks, we should be able to get back in our classrooms safely,” he added.
By Will Hazell
Construction industry
Ministers had always called for the construction sector and housebuilders to continue working during the lockdown, as official guidance was for those who could not work from home to carry on.
But most of the big home builders closed their sites in the face of significant public pressure, particularly on social media. Many construction sites have already started to reopen, with the Home Builders’.
Federation stating its members are “planning a gradual return to work, in a structured way that ensures the safety of its workforce, stakeholders and the general public”. The sector has been working with the Government on “safe working protocols”, which were published last night.
Factory workers
The Prime Minister has come under fire from manufacturing and factory workers’ representatives for encouraging the sector to return to work without effective safety guidelines being published first.
While many such workplaces have been operating throughout the lockdown, union leaders have warned employers have not had enough time to ensure such environments will be “Covid-19 safe”.
John Phillips, GMB acting general secretary, said employers have had “no time or opportunity to purchase equipment to prepare for this – if, of course, it’s available in the PPE shortage crisis”.
And he added: “Sending workers back to unsafe and unprepared workplaces is negligent.”
Restaurants
The hospitality industry has been among the hardest hit by the coronavirus crisis as socialising, particularly indoors, has been completely forbidden during the outbreak. But Mr Johnson has offered a glimmer of hope to the sector with the suggestion that at least some venues could potentially open in July.
But quite how restaurants come back, remains unclear, with restaurateurs asking for a clearer picture from Mr Johnson.
James Ramsden, co-owner of the Michelin-starred Pidgin restaurant in London said: “The suggestion is, perhaps, that those with outdoor space and, I don’t know, adequate toilet facilities, will be allowed to reopen but there are so many question marks over this that we’re all still very much in limbo.”
Others have been encouraged by the timescale. Pip Lacey, chef patron at Hicce restaurant, London, said: “This was more positive news than we were thinking a few weeks ago. Although it’s all very well to say July but we need rules and guidelines addressed to the industry so we can plan what it looks like operationally.”
By Josh Barrie
Pubs
Like restaurants, pubs have been taken among the biggest financial impacts from the Covid-19 social distancing measures. A survey released yesterday revealed that four in 10 pubs – around 19,000 – do not believe they will be able to survive beyond June as many have not been eligible for Government support.
Emma McClarkin, Chief Executive of the British Beer & Pub Association, said the Prime Minister’s roadmap offered “more uncertainty” in the weeks ahead.
“If the Government plans to keep pubs closed until the final phase of release, this would make pubs first in and last out of lockdown,” she said.
“Despite this, the Government hasn’t outlined any specific additional financial support for pubs to assure and help them through the extended lockdown hardship they face. We understand that pubs should only open when safe to do so, but extending the lockdown without offering additional support will be devastating.”
By Josh Barrie
Beauticians and hairdressers
The hair and beauty sector has been another major casualty from the lockdown, with social distancing rules requiring people remain 2m apart forcing barbers, hairdressers and nail bars to close indefinitely.
Under the Government’s plans, such businesses will be allowed to reopen from July onwards if the infection rate remains low. The move has been welcomed by the sector, but it has urged greater guidance on what protective equipment will be needed.
Hilary Hall, Chief Executive of the National Hair & Beauty Federation, said: “The safety of the people who work our industry is paramount, and there are many concerns within the hair and beauty industry about the challenges of working in close proximity with clients in a job where physical contact is inevitable.
She added: “We urgently need clarification about what kind of PPE is required, and we are working with the Government to provide clear guidelines so salons can return to work safely when the time is right.”


inews--2020-05-11--Coronavirus lockdown: could weddings be allowed under government guidelines?

Coronavirus lockdown : could weddings be allowed under government guidelines ?
A small group could be allowed to attend but not before June The new government guidelines could mean some guests could attend weddings and civil partnerships in person from June ( Photo : Getty ) Could couples soon be able to say “ I do ” with a smattering of friends and family physically present ?
The Government 's 50-page document outlining some conditional easing of the coronavirus lockdown offers some encouragement to those still hoping for a Summer wedding .
Talking about phase two of easing restrictions which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ the Government is ... examining how to enable people to gather in slightly larger groups to better facilitate small weddings ” .
Following the Prime Minister ’ s address on Sunday , Justice Secretary Robert Buckland said he was giving a `` lot of anxious consideration to the effect of the potential changes '' to rules on marriage ceremonies adding `` watch this space , we 're working on it . ''
Many couples have been forced to cancel their big day because of the lockdown , incurring financial losses they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insurance .
Around 32,000 weddings and civil partnerships have been cancelled in England and Wales since the lockdown .
This figure is expected to rise to 50,000 by the end of this month .
Others are hanging on in the hope that their Summer wedding can still take place , even if it is a slimline version with a reduced guestlist - an adjustment some couples may secretly welcome .
A petition has been launched calling for the government to allow register office to conduct the legal formalities for marriages and civil partnerships @ @ @ @ @ @ @ services .
Ben Jackson , 25 , and Sophie Austin , 26 , planned to have 200 guests at their March wedding , but following the lockdown were forced to change their plans .
While they were able to shift their big wedding to September without any financial issues , they still wanted to mark the original date .
So the couple from Croydon gathered even more friends and family - around 300 in all - to a Zoom ceremony conducted by their pastor remotely .
They will still need to complete the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I think it really drew back the extra stuff of a wedding and made it really obvious what was important : the two of us saying the vows to each other , “ she told the Mirror .
“ Even though we did n't have everyone here it made it more intimate and special . ''

Could couples soon be able to say “I do” with a smattering of friends and family physically present?
The Government’s 50-page document outlining some conditional easing of the coronavirus lockdown offers some encouragement to those still hoping for a Summer wedding.
Talking about phase two of easing restrictions which could take place in June it states: “the Government is… examining how to enable people to gather in slightly larger groups to better facilitate small weddings”.
Following the Prime Minister’s address on Sunday, Justice Secretary Robert Buckland said he was giving a “lot of anxious consideration to the effect of the potential changes” to rules on marriage ceremonies adding “watch this space, we’re working on it.”
Cancellations
Many couples have been forced to cancel their big day because of the lockdown, incurring financial losses they are now struggling to claw back through insurance.
Around 32,000 weddings and civil partnerships have been cancelled in England and Wales since the lockdown. This figure is expected to rise to 50,000 by the end of this month.
Others are hanging on in the hope that their Summer wedding can still take place, even if it is a slimline version with a reduced guestlist – an adjustment some couples may secretly welcome.
A petition has been launched calling for the government to allow register office to conduct the legal formalities for marriages and civil partnerships online via the likes of Zoom video services.
Zoom ceremony
Ben Jackson, 25, and Sophie Austin, 26, planned to have 200 guests at their March wedding, but following the lockdown were forced to change their plans.
While they were able to shift their big wedding to September without any financial issues, they still wanted to mark the original date.
So the couple from Croydon gathered even more friends and family – around 300 in all – to a Zoom ceremony conducted by their pastor remotely. They will still need to complete the legal process once lockdown lifts.
Despite not having loved ones physically present Sophie said the ceremony was “amazing”.
“I think it really drew back the extra stuff of a wedding and made it really obvious what was important: the two of us saying the vows to each other, “ she told the Mirror. “Even though we didn’t have everyone here it made it more intimate and special.”


inews--2020-05-11--Why simple funerals were gaining popularity even before coronavirus, thanks to David Bowie effect

Why simple funerals were gaining popularity even before coronavirus , thanks to David Bowie effect No-frills packages cost less and let families organise their own send-off Funeral director Dignity has noted in its latest trading update that its customers have , understandably , been choosing its simple funerals more often since the coronavirus lockdown started .
So far this quarter , 60 per cent of clients are now choosing a simple funeral , as opposed to the full service .
This compares with just 20 per cent in the first quarter of the year .
The dramatic surge in demand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down to necessity .
The company mentioned that it has stopped offering limousines , while church services are a no-go .
For many it is simply not worth the high price-tag for a grand ceremony that can only be attended by a few people , so they are opting for the basic option now perhaps in the hope of organising a memorial service later .
It is of course a source of enormous pain that many people will not be able to give their relatives a proper send-off in these awful times .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not a new thing and has in fact been growing in popularity in recent years .
The cost motivation is an obvious one , with many funerals costing several thousand pounds .
Even Dignity ’ s simple package costs just under £2,000 , or £1,695 in Scotland .
The Competition and Markets Authority ( CMA ) is conducting an investigation into the high prices on the market , but this has now been delayed by another six months so we may not see the full outcome until March next year .
With @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understandable that many families are choosing the more cost-effective option .
Uptake from notable people has also helped to put the option on the map .
David Bowie had a direct cremation in 2016 , which bypasses the funeral ceremony altogether and includes just the cremation of the deceased with nobody else present .
This option is also cheaper , and has the added benefit of allowing mourners to escape the traditional trappings of death and celebrate the life of their loved ones in a more personal way .
It may be that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ switch to online shopping or increased home-working , where Covid-19 is accelerating a change that was already happening and may even leave us with some lasting habits .

Funeral director Dignity has noted in its latest trading update that its customers have, understandably, been choosing its simple funerals more often since the coronavirus lockdown started.
So far this quarter, 60 per cent of clients are now choosing a simple funeral, as opposed to the full service. This compares with just 20 per cent in the first quarter of the year.
The dramatic surge in demand for its most basic plan is primarily down to necessity. The company mentioned that it has stopped offering limousines, while church services are a no-go.
For many it is simply not worth the high price-tag for a grand ceremony that can only be attended by a few people, so they are opting for the basic option now perhaps in the hope of organising a memorial service later.
Growing demand for no-frills funerals
It is of course a source of enormous pain that many people will not be able to give their relatives a proper send-off in these awful times. But the idea of a no-frills funeral is not a new thing and has in fact been growing in popularity in recent years.
The cost motivation is an obvious one, with many funerals costing several thousand pounds. Even Dignity’s simple package costs just under £2,000, or £1,695 in Scotland.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is conducting an investigation into the high prices on the market, but this has now been delayed by another six months so we may not see the full outcome until March next year.
With no changes expected soon, it is understandable that many families are choosing the more cost-effective option.
The David Bowie effect
Uptake from notable people has also helped to put the option on the map. David Bowie had a direct cremation in 2016, which bypasses the funeral ceremony altogether and includes just the cremation of the deceased with nobody else present.
This option is also cheaper, and has the added benefit of allowing mourners to escape the traditional trappings of death and celebrate the life of their loved ones in a more personal way.
It may be that this is another example, like the switch to online shopping or increased home-working, where Covid-19 is accelerating a change that was already happening and may even leave us with some lasting habits.


inews--2020-05-11--Piers Morgan’s declaration that he no longer supports Trump shows how this crisis is changing people

Piers Morgan’s declaration that he no longer supports Trump shows how this crisis is changing people for the better

Piers Morgan ’ s declaration that he no longer supports Trump shows how this crisis is changing people for the better All around the country , people are coalescing , coming together in pain and confusion , as well as empathy Well , well , what have we here ?
Piers Morgan , chastened by the madness of the coronavirus pandemic , has turned into a saviour .
I mock not .
Mocking , in these times , leaves a bitter taste in the mouth .
Which is why The News Quiz and Have I Got News For You ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ best to keep our spirits up , but when the news is so unremittingly awful , best not to pretend it ’ s business as usual .
Back to Morgan .
The fractious GMB presenter got paid big bucks for picking fights with women , anti-racists , people who liked vegan sausage rolls , anyone who detested Trump and lefties .
The last time I was on his show , we rowed vociferously about the monarchy .
Never been asked back .
In an interview with Decca Aitkenhead of The Sunday Times , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s put all the stupidity and nonsense and the silliness , and the point-scoring and culture wars behind us .
All that stuff has to be changed .
We have to put all our energies into being different people coming out of this .
Better people.
” He vows to temper his language and tone .
Psychoanalyst and author Susie Orbach also believes something historical is happening out there : “ Covid-19 is cleaning the lens , so we can see more clearly.
” And what do we see ?
A YouGov survey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Government to put health and wellbeing above economic growth .
Citizens are coalescing , coming together in pain and confusion , as well as empathy .
Turns out we ’ re not always competing , selfish automatons or “ naturally ” obligated only to kith and kin .
Donald Trump and Piers Morgan celebrate Kim Kardashian 's appearance on `` The Apprentice '' on November 10 , 2010 in New York .
( Photo : John W. Ferguson/Getty Images ) The market , neoliberalism ’ s solution to everything , is not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US and the UK .
Andrew Lansley , the health secretary in the 2010 coalition government , Jeremy Hunt , George Osborne , Johnson , Dominic Raab and other right-wing ideologues debilitated the NHS and other services .
Do you really believe that the near-death of the PM has made them into social democrats ?
One reason for so many lethal errors of judgement on Covid-19 is that these guys never understood the ethos of a welfare state or the need for policies to sustain the social good .
I suggest they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and claps and vows are insincere .
Maybe it ’ s not their fault .
Zealotry holds them captive .
Hence this rush to get back to “ normal ” .
As I write this , financial gamblers are raking it in , profiteers are looking for lucrative corona contracts , and the low-paid are being pushed into workplaces which are not wholly safe .
Meanwhile , the national psychology is shifting , says Orbach : “ The opportunity is here for reframing… Let ’ s embrace the complexity of what it means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sorrow as we think and feel our way to come out of this , wiser , humbler and more connected .
”

Well, well, what have we here? Piers Morgan, chastened by the madness of the coronavirus pandemic, has turned into a saviour. I mock not. Mocking, in these times, leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.
Which is why The News Quiz and Have I Got News For You? fall flat. They are doing their best to keep our spirits up, but when the news is so unremittingly awful, best not to pretend it’s business as usual.
Back to Morgan. The fractious GMB presenter got paid big bucks for picking fights with women, anti-racists, people who liked vegan sausage rolls, anyone who detested Trump and lefties. The last time I was on his show, we rowed vociferously about the monarchy. Never been asked back.
After years of playing the pantomime villain, Morgan is going through a life change.
In an interview with Decca Aitkenhead of The Sunday Times, he was reflective: “Let’s put all the stupidity and nonsense and the silliness, and the point-scoring and culture wars behind us. All that stuff has to be changed. We have to put all our energies into being different people coming out of this. Better people.” He vows to temper his language and tone.
But not with obfuscating, dangerously maladroit ministers or the dissembling Boris Johnson. Respect, sir.
Psychoanalyst and author Susie Orbach also believes something historical is happening out there: “Covid-19 is cleaning the lens, so we can see more clearly.”
And what do we see? A YouGov survey found 8 out of 10 people want the Government to put health and wellbeing above economic growth. Citizens are coalescing, coming together in pain and confusion, as well as empathy. Turns out we’re not always competing, selfish automatons or “naturally” obligated only to kith and kin.
The market, neoliberalism’s solution to everything, is not working for its most fanatical adherents, the US and the UK.
Andrew Lansley, the health secretary in the 2010 coalition government, Jeremy Hunt, George Osborne, Johnson, Dominic Raab and other right-wing ideologues debilitated the NHS and other services. Do you really believe that the near-death of the PM has made them into social democrats?
One reason for so many lethal errors of judgement on Covid-19 is that these guys never understood the ethos of a welfare state or the need for policies to sustain the social good. I suggest they still don’t. Their praise and claps and vows are insincere. Maybe it’s not their fault. Zealotry holds them captive. Hence this rush to get back to “normal”.
As I write this, financial gamblers are raking it in, profiteers are looking for lucrative corona contracts, and the low-paid are being pushed into workplaces which are not wholly safe.
Meanwhile, the national psychology is shifting, says Orbach: “The opportunity is here for reframing… Let’s embrace the complexity of what it means to be human in this time of sorrow as we think and feel our way to come out of this, wiser, humbler and more connected.”
The wiser, humbler and more connected Morgan has tuned into the zeitgeist. Cometh the moment, cometh the man.


inews--2020-05-11--Coronavirus face masks: the government's new lockdown advice explained - and how to make a reuseable

Coronavirus face masks: the government's new lockdown advice explained - and how to make a reuseable face mask

Coronavirus face masks : the government 's new lockdown advice explained - and how to make a reuseable face mask Face masks are now recommended to help stop the spread of Covid-19 For several months the UK offered different advice about how important face masks are , compared with many other countries which have long required the public to wear them out and about .
What is the Government advice ?
Prime Minister Boris Johnson addressing the nation about coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) from 10 Downing Street ( Photo : PA ) People should wear face coverings when they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ distancing is n't possible and where you will come into contact with people you do not normally meet '' , for instance in some shops or on public transport .
Who should wear one ?
Experts have previously suggested that , in order for the use of masks to be an effective tool in reducing infections , around nine in 10 people need to wear them .
The Government document states that face coverings should not be used by children under the age of two , people with respiratory conditions or those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ correctly - such as primary school age children unassisted .
What sort of coverings should I use ?
Elderly members of the public wearing face masks walk down a street in Central London ( Photo : Getty ) People have been advised not to use surgical masks or respirators as these should be reserved for health and care workers and for people in industrial settings such as those exposed to dust .
Last month , Scotland issued guidance on the use of face coverings in public , urging people to use coverings in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rule is hard to maintain - in food shops or on public transport for example .
What is the science behind face masks ?
It appears that one of the main routes of the spread of the novel coronavirus is through droplets - usually through coughs and sneezes , but these can also spread through talking .
But the World Health Organisation has stressed that there is no evidence that wearing a mask - whether medical or other types - by healthy persons in the wider community can prevent them from infection with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do experts say ?
A woman wears a protective mask as she travels on an underground train in London ( Photo : Getty ) Trish Greenhalgh , professor of primary care at the University of Oxford , said : `` The science on this is clear : Covid-19 is most commonly transmitted by droplets emitted when we cough , sneeze , shout , sing and even just breathe in close proximity to others .
`` Cloth face coverings are highly effective at blocking droplets coming out of the mouth and nose .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can stop 90 % or 95 % of the droplets this will cause a very dramatic reduction in the number of people who catch the virus .
`` Face coverings , which can be made out of a double layer of cloth , are a crucially important measure for bringing the country out of lockdown , since in reality few of us can get properly back to work without getting within two metres of other people ( either while travelling to work or in offices and factories ) .
If I develop symptoms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wear a covering ?
Are there any downsides to using coverings ?
Concerns have been raised that masks could give a false sense of security and mean that people are less stringent with other preventative measures such as social distancing and hand hygiene .
Problems could also arise without the proper use of a mask - including possible self-contamination if people touch and re-use a contaminated mask .
Depending on the type of mask used , some people may incur breathing difficulties .

People in England must wear face coverings on public transport from 15 June, and could be denied the right to travel if they do not.
The new rule comes on the day non-essential shops will re-open across the nation and a significant increase in people using public transport is expected.
Grant Shapps, the Transport Secretary, admitted that remaining two metres away from other people can be difficult on crowded commuter trains and buses.
Exactly how this will be enforced is open to interpretation. Police would have the right to deal with people refusing to wear a mask, but the government says it does not expect to encounter many serious issues with refusal.
It did not suggest free masks will be available at stations, but there will be a concerted promotional campaign so people are aware before they travel.
He said the requirement to wear a face covering is in order to ensure people are still protected, and to minimise the chances of spreading the virus.
What is the Government advice?
For several months the UK offered different advice about how important face masks are, compared with many other countries which have long required the public to wear them out and about.
Alongside the new rules on public transport, people are asked to wear face coverings when they are in “an enclosed space where social distancing isn’t possible and where you will come into contact with people you do not normally meet”, for instance in shops.
A Government document published last month states that, while wearing a face covering does not protect the wearer, it may protect others if people are infected but have not yet developed symptoms.
Who should wear one?
Anyone on public transport. But beyond that it is more complicated.
Experts have previously suggested that, in order for the use of masks to be an effective tool in reducing infections, around nine in 10 people need to wear them.
Some groups – such as people with breathing problems or young children – may struggle to wear face coverings.
The Government states that face coverings should not be used by children under the age of two, people with respiratory conditions or those who may find it difficult to manage them correctly – such as primary school age children unassisted.
What sort of face coverings should I use?
Scarves, cotton home-made coverings that cover nose and mouth and other boughtmasks that are not ones used by the health service are fine.
Officials said that people can make coverings at home, but added that “the key thing is it should cover your mouth and nose”.
People have been advised not to use surgical masks or respirators as these should be reserved for health and care workers and for people in industrial settings such as those exposed to dust.
Do health workers get priority?
The World Health Organisation has said it is imperative that medical masks are prioritised for health and care workers.
Concerns have previously been raised about the prospect of dwindling supplies for health workers following an instruction for the general public to wear masks.
But health and care workers are required to wear specific types of surgical masks or respirators depending on the type of care they are giving a patient.
The government suggests that surgical masks and respirators must be reserved for those who need them to protect against risks in their workplace.
Last month, Scotland issued guidance on the use of face coverings in public, urging people to use coverings in enclosed spaces where the two-metre social distancing rule is hard to maintain – in food shops or on public transport for example.
What is the science behind face masks?
Officials have said that the science behind the use of face masks and face coverings is “not straightforward”.
It appears that one of the main routes of the spread of the novel coronavirus is through droplets – usually through coughs and sneezes, but these can also spread through talking.
The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) thinks the evidence of masks preventing the spread of infection from one person to another is “marginal but positive”.
Studies into coughs and flu have previously shown that a medical mask can help prevent the spread of infectious droplets from an infected person to someone else.
They might also prevent potential contamination of the wider environment by these droplets.
But the World Health Organisation has stressed that there is no evidence that wearing a mask – whether medical or other types – by healthy persons in the wider community can prevent them from infection with respiratory viruses, including Covid-19.
What do experts say?
Trish Greenhalgh, professor of primary care at the University of Oxford, said: “The science on this is clear: Covid-19 is most commonly transmitted by droplets emitted when we cough, sneeze, shout, sing and even just breathe in close proximity to others.
“Cloth face coverings are highly effective at blocking droplets coming out of the mouth and nose. They’re not perfect, but if you can stop 90% or 95% of the droplets this will cause a very dramatic reduction in the number of people who catch the virus.
“Face coverings, which can be made out of a double layer of cloth, are a crucially important measure for bringing the country out of lockdown, since in reality few of us can get properly back to work without getting within two metres of other people (either while travelling to work or in offices and factories).
If I develop symptoms, can I go out if I wear a covering?
No. The official advice states: “If you have symptoms of Covid-19 (cough and/or high temperature) you and your household should isolate at home: wearing a face covering does not change this.”
The rules around having coronavirus and self-isolating are the same regardless of any type of covering.
Are there any downsides to using face coverings?
Concerns have been raised that masks could give a false sense of security and mean that people are less stringent with other preventative measures such as social distancing and hand hygiene.
Problems could also arise without the proper use of a mask – including possible self-contamination if people touch and re-use a contaminated mask. Depending on the type of mask used, some people may incur breathing difficulties.


inews--2020-05-11--Boris Johnson is out of touch with workers who are putting their lives on the line

Boris Johnson is out of touch with workers who are putting their lives on the line He was addressing multi-millionaire bosses and telling them to send their employees back to work , not speaking to the workers themselves I was alert to the fact that the Government ’ s graphics department appears to have been furloughed ( the Covid “ alert level ” graphic is remarkably similar to Nando ’ s Peri-Ometer : if you ’ re interested , we appear to be at “ medium strength ” ) .
I was also alert to the possibility of playing golf @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dog , from tomorrow .
Most of all , I was alert to the fact that our Prime Minister was not speaking for everyone , or indeed to everyone .
Take his advice on going to work .
“ We now need to stress that anyone who can ’ t work from home ... should be actively encouraged to go to work.
” Note carefully the use of language here .
They should be actively encouraged .
By whom should they be encouraged ?
By their partner ?
By the Government ?
Surely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have said : “ I am actively encouraging you to go to work.
” This is not pedantry for its own sake .
It matters .
Language matters .
Tone matters .
And , in a prime ministerial broadcast of this sort , no detail is too small to be insignificant .
The Covid-19 alert graphic had a striking resemblance to a Nando ’ s Peri-Ometer .
( Photo : TOLGA AKMEN/AFP via Getty Images ) The point I am making is this : while he was broadcasting to the nation , Mr @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contentious and potentially life-threatening point about the return to the workplace , not addressing the 32.5 million people who make up the British workforce , but a much smaller , more select audience – probably a tenth of that number – who are business owners .
Yes , they were the ones who should be actively encouraging their employees to go to work the very next day ( even though it was now Sunday evening ) while at the same time advising them not to use public transport .
The rhetoric throughout this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it together , that somehow Covid-19 is an equal opportunity killer , even though the ethnic , demographic and age profiles of the victims clearly show that it is not the case .
He specifically mentioned that those in the construction industry could get back to work , no matter that their workplace may be full of peril .
That will no doubt please the likes of John Bloor ( owner of Bloor Homes , worth £1.025bn and a major donor to the Tory party ) , James Wates ( chairman of Wates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ donated £450,000 to the Conservatives ) and , of course , Anthony Bamford ( owner of JCB , with a net worth of over £4bn and who has donated millions to the Tories over the years ) .
They will be delighted that their businesses can get up and running again , and , presumably , they won ’ t have to worry about the dangers of travelling on public transport .
Mr Johnson ’ s address was full of confusion and obfuscation , and the succeeding 24 hours were spent on clarification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Dominic Raab ) .
I ’ m alert , like most of us are , to one thing : people across the country are making their own decisions because they don ’ t trust the Government to do it for them .

Like most of the country, I managed to stay alert (adj. vigilantly attentive) throughout Boris Johnson’s fist-shaking, desk-thumping address to the nation.
I was alert to the fact that the Government’s graphics department appears to have been furloughed (the Covid “alert level” graphic is remarkably similar to Nando’s Peri-Ometer: if you’re interested, we appear to be at “medium strength”). I was also alert to the possibility of playing golf on my own, or with my dog, from tomorrow.
Most of all, I was alert to the fact that our Prime Minister was not speaking for everyone, or indeed to everyone.
Take his advice on going to work. “We now need to stress that anyone who can’t work from home… should be actively encouraged to go to work.” Note carefully the use of language here. They should be actively encouraged.
By whom should they be encouraged? By their partner? By the Government? Surely not, because then he would then have said: “I am actively encouraging you to go to work.”
This is not pedantry for its own sake. It matters. Language matters. Tone matters. And, in a prime ministerial broadcast of this sort, no detail is too small to be insignificant.
The point I am making is this: while he was broadcasting to the nation, Mr Johnson was, in this crucial, contentious and potentially life-threatening point about the return to the workplace, not addressing the 32.5 million people who make up the British workforce, but a much smaller, more select audience – probably a tenth of that number – who are business owners.
Yes, they were the ones who should be actively encouraging their employees to go to work the very next day (even though it was now Sunday evening) while at the same time advising them not to use public transport.
The rhetoric throughout this crisis is that we are all in it together, that somehow Covid-19 is an equal opportunity killer, even though the ethnic, demographic and age profiles of the victims clearly show that it is not the case.
And Mr Johnson, by effectively addressing the audience with whom he feels most comfortable (let’s call them the boss class), blows apart any sense of a collective response.
He specifically mentioned that those in the construction industry could get back to work, no matter that their workplace may be full of peril. That will no doubt please the likes of John Bloor (owner of Bloor Homes, worth £1.025bn and a major donor to the Tory party), James Wates (chairman of Wates Group, worth £300m and whose company donated £450,000 to the Conservatives) and, of course, Anthony Bamford (owner of JCB, with a net worth of over £4bn and who has donated millions to the Tories over the years).
They will be delighted that their businesses can get up and running again, and, presumably, they won’t have to worry about the dangers of travelling on public transport.
Mr Johnson’s address was full of confusion and obfuscation, and the succeeding 24 hours were spent on clarification (or not, in the case of Dominic Raab). I’m alert, like most of us are, to one thing: people across the country are making their own decisions because they don’t trust the Government to do it for them.


inews--2020-05-11--We should prioritise trade with countries which respect human rights after the coronavirus pandemic

We should prioritise trade with countries which respect human rights after the coronavirus pandemic Ignoring China ’ s internal repression in return for cheap imports will prove more costly in the long run Once things open up even a little more , trade will start to flow again .
It will be much reduced , to begin with , but human nature , and human need , point to a resumption of exchange .
The prophecies of the anti-capitalist left and the nationalist right are over-heated .
I ’ m sure there will be some changes in national and international @ @ @ @ @ @ @ affect the movement of goods , services and money .
Expect to see pressure for greater onshoring of manufacturing , and particularly a new view of which industries are strategic .
Where once governments only fretted about maintaining domestic defence and perhaps energy suppliers , now there will be a wider definition , extending to include the pharmaceutical and medical device industries , and perhaps PPE , too .
Some of this will be justified , and some will be tokenism which amounts only to fighting the last war , but it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries will consider not just what they could have done with in the last crisis – that is to say the current pandemic – but what the next crisis and the one after that might involve .
It would seem wise , for example , to take a more defensive view of national telecoms infrastructure than the UK has so far adopted .
There are over 7.6 billion people on our planet , and the economic facts which make it inefficient for them all to produce everything they need for themselves , bespoke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ true .
Competition , innovation , economies of scale , and the benefits of specialisation will all still exist .
We are waving goodbye to being part of the EU ( Photo : JOHN THYS/AFP via Getty Images ) Chinese police officers wearing masks stand in front of the Tiananmen Gate earlier in the year .
( Photo : Betsy Joles/Getty Images ) Democracy brings ups and downs , and an inevitable degree of uncertainty in terms of policy and law-making , but it tends to be far more reliable when it comes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devastate trade .
The rule of law and the honouring of contracts are valuable prizes , not “ nice to have ” but essential if we are to prosper .
Consider , by contrast , the uncertainty brought by this country ’ s relationship with two of its most tyrannical trading partners .
The decision to turn a blind eye to Saudi Arabia ’ s crimes against humanity and exportation of extremism in return for quick and easy investments , or ignoring China ’ s internal repression and censorship in return for bagging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a win in the short term , but both have proved extremely costly in the medium and long term .

The demise of globalisation as a result of the coronavirus pandemic is much exaggerated.
Much of the world’s trade routes are currently seized up, thanks to lockdown and sickness alike. But each of those factors will dissipate in time.
Once things open up even a little more, trade will start to flow again. It will be much reduced, to begin with, but human nature, and human need, point to a resumption of exchange. The prophecies of the anti-capitalist left and the nationalist right are over-heated.
I’m sure there will be some changes in national and international politics as a result of Covid-19 which affect the movement of goods, services and money. Expect to see pressure for greater onshoring of manufacturing, and particularly a new view of which industries are strategic.
Where once governments only fretted about maintaining domestic defence and perhaps energy suppliers, now there will be a wider definition, extending to include the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, and perhaps PPE, too. Some of this will be justified, and some will be tokenism which amounts only to fighting the last war, but it is likely to happen nonetheless.
More foresighted countries will consider not just what they could have done with in the last crisis – that is to say the current pandemic – but what the next crisis and the one after that might involve. It would seem wise, for example, to take a more defensive view of national telecoms infrastructure than the UK has so far adopted.
These changes are still likely to be marginal compared with the vast scheme of global trade.
There are over 7.6 billion people on our planet, and the economic facts which make it inefficient for them all to produce everything they need for themselves, bespoke and in their own backyard, remain true. Competition, innovation, economies of scale, and the benefits of specialisation will all still exist.
Rather than try to work out whether to trade again, it would be more useful and more informative to consider how to do so.
For the UK in particular, this is doubly important. We won’t just be leaving lockdown, we’ll be leaving a trade regime which denied us any right to set our own rules and policies for 40 years.
(Incidentally, this should calm some of the fears of those who opposed us doing so – if you were worried that this country establishing its own trade policy would be a moment of disruption, that effect is now discounted against the fact that total disruption is now the global norm, and all countries are about to have to reset the basis of their trade whether they planned to or not.)
In doing so, we should start by challenging a myth. The idea has been prevalent for too long that international trade policy must always be a choice between values and money.
Supposedly, a country can care about democracy, freedom and fundamental rights, or it can care about imports and exports, but the two considerations must otherwise be in conflict.
That is a damaging mistake, which harms both our interests and the interests of people around the world. The truth is that the values of a country have a powerful impact on its ability to be a stable, reliable trading partner.
Democracy brings ups and downs, and an inevitable degree of uncertainty in terms of policy and law-making, but it tends to be far more reliable when it comes to the fundamentals that can facilitate or devastate trade. The rule of law and the honouring of contracts are valuable prizes, not “nice to have” but essential if we are to prosper.
Consider, by contrast, the uncertainty brought by this country’s relationship with two of its most tyrannical trading partners. The decision to turn a blind eye to Saudi Arabia’s crimes against humanity and exportation of extremism in return for quick and easy investments, or ignoring China’s internal repression and censorship in return for bagging cheap imports, might have seemed like a win in the short term, but both have proved extremely costly in the medium and long term.
It would be impractical to limit trade only to perfectly free states, and doing so would involve giving up the capacity for trade to liberate and liberalise unfree people. But we should stop treating freedom and trade as if they were unconnected, or even in conflict.
As global trade resumes, and we establish a trade policy for the first time in many years, we should appreciate that values bring a material as well as moral benefit.


inews--2020-05-11--When will schools reopen? Why UK primary schools will open first after coronavirus lockdown - and ho

When will schools reopen? Why UK primary schools will open first after coronavirus lockdown - and how long secondaries could be closed

When will schools reopen ?
Why UK primary schools will open first after coronavirus lockdown - and how long secondaries could be closed Schools have been closed to all but the children of essential workers since the end of March to help guard against the coronavirus pandemic Schools have been closed to all but the children of essential workers since the end of March to help guard against the coronavirus pandemic .
But the Prime Minister has now set tentative dates for when pupils and teachers may be able to return to class .
He has pinpointed 1 June as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but this is likely to only apply to some schools in England .
Wales ' Education Minister Kirsty Williams has already said Welsh schools will not reopen on 1 June , and Scotland 's First Minister Nicola Surgeon has said a return `` might not be possible '' by the summer holidays , which start at the end of June .
Boris Johnson made the announcement during his Sunday evening briefing ( Photo : Getty ) Primary schools will be the first to come back , with pupils in Reception , Year @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the queue .
Mr Johnson said primary students could return in stages from 1 June `` at the earliest '' , meaning a few year groups start first , with others coming later , or classes alternating between physical lessons and studying at home .
Any return to schools is conditional on the virus ' reproduction rate , and the number of new infections staying low , Mr Johnson said .
No date has been set for secondary schools , which will reopen as part of the next phase of lockdown easing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possibility of some secondary pupils who have exams next year getting some teaching before the summer holidays .
`` Our ambition is that secondary pupils facing exams next year will get at least some time with their teachers before the holidays , '' he said .
Schools have been closed to most pupils since March ( Photo : Getty ) What are teachers saying ?
Mary Bousted , joint general secretary of the National Education Union , said : `` Coronavirus continues to ravage communities in the UK and the rate of Covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the wider opening of our schools .
Who is currently going to school ?

Boris Johnson has announced the Government’s plan to gradually bring the UK out of lockdown, including a timeline for when schools will reopen.
Schools have been closed to all but the children of essential workers since the end of March to help guard against the coronavirus pandemic.
But the Prime Minister has now set tentative dates for when pupils and teachers may be able to return to class.
He has pinpointed 1 June as the earliest possible date for schools reopening, but this is likely to only apply to some schools in England.
Wales’ Education Minister Kirsty Williams has already said Welsh schools will not reopen on 1 June, and Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Surgeon has said a return “might not be possible” by the summer holidays, which start at the end of June.
In Northern Ireland, education minister Peter Weir has said a phased return in September is most likely.
When will primary schools reopen?
Primary schools will be the first to come back, with pupils in Reception, Year 1 and Year 6 at the front of the queue.
Mr Johnson said primary students could return in stages from 1 June “at the earliest”, meaning a few year groups start first, with others coming later, or classes alternating between physical lessons and studying at home.
Other social distancing measures could include staggering break times and putting a cap of class sizes.
Any return to schools is conditional on the virus’ reproduction rate, and the number of new infections staying low, Mr Johnson said.
When will secondary schools reopen?
No date has been set for secondary schools, which will reopen as part of the next phase of lockdown easing.
However Mr Johnson did float the possibility of some secondary pupils who have exams next year getting some teaching before the summer holidays.
“Our ambition is that secondary pupils facing exams next year will get at least some time with their teachers before the holidays,” he said.
What are teachers saying?
Teachers have called Mr Johnson “reckless” for aiming to reopen schools in June.
Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said: “Coronavirus continues to ravage communities in the UK and the rate of Covid-19 infection is still far too great for the wider opening of our schools.
“If schools are re-opened to blatant breaches of health and safety, we will strongly support our members who take steps to protect their pupils, their colleagues and their families.
“The worst outcome of any wider re-opening of schools is a second spike of Covid-19 infection.”
Who is currently going to school?
Currently, only children of key workers, as well as those who are vulnerable, such as children with a social worker, are allowed to attend school.
Figures from 30 April show around 191,000 have been going to school, roughly two per cent of the usual number.


inews--2020-05-11--When can I go fishing? Latest on when angling will be allowed after Government issues new UK lockdow

When can I go fishing? Latest on when angling will be allowed after Government issues new UK lockdown rules

When can I go fishing ?
Latest on when angling will be allowed after Government issues new UK lockdown rules Latest on when angling will be allowed , as government issues new lockdown guidelines .
If you regularly partake in a spot of fishing , you may be eager to get back out on the open water or riverbank again .
When will I be able to fish again ?
If you are planning to go fishing in lakes or the sea you must be within your own household and two metres from other households .
Although this will now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be “ no sunbathing , picnics or barbecues ” , which is in contrast to Johnson ’ s new advice .
The First Minister of Wales , Mark Drakeford , said that Wales would allow more frequent exercise and the opening of garden centres , but that said schools will not reopen from 1 June .
Is fishing allowed in other European countries ?
On 4 May angling resumed in Belgium , and many countries have now also announced timetables for lifting restrictions on activities that allow social distancing to continue , such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden has already confirmed to MPs that ministers are actively considering how low risk outdoor activities such as angling and golf might be permitted in the first phase of easing restrictions .
How can I prepare to fish again ?
The EA has also advised on other ways that keen anglers can keep busy and prepare for when they can head back out to fish again .
“ First up , take some time to get your tackle into top condition so you ’ re ready to go when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enjoy our favourite pastime again , ” adds the EA .

If you regularly partake in a spot of fishing, you may be eager to get back out on the open water or riverbank again.
But with the UK still under lockdown, when will the public be able to fish?
Here’s everything you need to know.
When will I be able to fish again?
According to the Government’s new lockdown rules, angling and water sports were allowed to resume in England from Wednesday (13 May).
If you are planning to go fishing in lakes or the sea you must be within your own household and two metres from other households.
However, outdoor swimming pools, indoor swimming pools, and gyms remain closed for the foreseeable future.
But the leaders of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have rejected Boris Johnson’s new “stay alert” slogan.
The First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon, has ordered those in Scotland to follow different advice on outdoors exercise.
Although this will now be unlimited, Sturgeon said there must be “no sunbathing, picnics or barbecues”, which is in contrast to Johnson’s new advice.
The First Minister of Wales, Mark Drakeford, said that Wales would allow more frequent exercise and the opening of garden centres, but that said schools will not reopen from 1 June.
The Northern Ireland Executive has now published its five-stage plan for slowly easing the coronavirus lockdown.
Although the blueprint does not currently include projected dates, phase one includes the reopening of outdoor spaces and public sports amenities.
Is fishing allowed in other European countries?
This report sets how recreational fishing could be permitted, alongside drawing on experience in other European countries including Germany, Holland, Denmark, the Czech Republic and Norway.
Angling has been allowed to continue in these countries under certain conditions during the pandemic.
On 4 May angling resumed in Belgium, and many countries have now also announced timetables for lifting restrictions on activities that allow social distancing to continue, such as fishing.
The Angling Trust explains that Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden has already confirmed to MPs that ministers are actively considering how low risk outdoor activities such as angling and golf might be permitted in the first phase of easing restrictions.
How can I prepare to fish again?
The Angling Trust has launched a new Fishing Buzz website which has lots of angling news, advice, tips and videos to keep the whole family entertained.
The EA has also advised on other ways that keen anglers can keep busy and prepare for when they can head back out to fish again.
“First up, take some time to get your tackle into top condition so you’re ready to go when we can return to the bankside and enjoy our favourite pastime again,” adds the EA.
They advise thoroughly cleaning and drying fishing nets and gear in order to ensure diseases and invasive species are removed to help to protect waterways and fish stocks.
They also advise disposing of old bait and preparing new bait, alongside tying rigs or flies.


inews--2020-05-11--Can I see my family and friends? New coronavirus lockdown rules on meeting people from other househo

Can I see my family and friends? New coronavirus lockdown rules on meeting people from other households, explained

Can I see my family and friends ?
New coronavirus lockdown rules on meeting people from other households , explained People from two households will be able to meet in a public place from Wednesday ( 13 May ) In a national address on Sunday ( 10 May ) , Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a number of changes to current lockdown measures that will come into force in the coming weeks .
However , Mr Johnson said there will be no immediate end to the lockdown and the new guidance will only apply in England , as Scotland , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own approaches to easing restrictions .
Am I allowed to visit family and friends ?
Social distancing guidance is still in force across the UK , with people advised to stay two metres apart from each other .
In England , people from two households will be able to meet in a public place from Wednesday ( 13 May ) , providing they maintain a two-metre distance .
Mr Johnson 's speech indicated that people will be allowed to sunbathe or chat in a park with a person from a different household , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to other destinations , such as parks or beaches , within England will also be permitted from Wednesday ( 13 May ) , but should only be done with members of your own household .
Crossing the border to Wales or Scotland for leisure activities is not allowed if different restrictions are in force .
Government guidance states : “ People may drive to outdoor open spaces irrespective of distance , so long as they respect social distancing guidance while they are there , because this does not involve contact with people outside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outdoor spaces , it is important that people respect the rules in Scotland , Wales and Northern Ireland and do not travel to different parts of the UK where it would be inconsistent with guidance or regulations issued by the relevant devolved administration.
” In Wales , the current advice on social distancing and visiting family remains the same , with the only changes to lockdown guidance being the reopening of garden centres and no limit on the amount of exercise per day .
Northern Ireland is due to announce its lockdown ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is expected to only have subtle changes .
What are the fines if rules are broken ?
Police officers have the power to stop and ask you where you are heading and could issue a fine if they do not believe your reason for travel falls within what is considered ‘ reasonable ’ for leaving your home .
In England , fines for breaching coronavirus regulations will now rise from £60 to £100 , while payment of the fine within 14 days will reduce the sum to £50 , up from the @ @ @

After almost two months of lockdown, the UK Government has now outlined a three-phase plan for “reopening society”.
In a national address on Sunday 10 May, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a number of changes to current lockdown measures that will come into force in the coming weeks.
However, Mr Johnson said there will be no immediate end to the lockdown and the new guidance will only apply in England, as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are adopting their own approaches to easing restrictions.
This is the latest advice on lockdown rules across the UK.
Am I allowed to visit family and friends?
Social distancing guidance is still in force across the UK, with people advised to stay two metres apart from each other.
In England, two people from two households will be able to meet in a public place from Wednesday (13 May), providing they maintain a two-metre distance.
However, visiting the homes of family and friends is still not allowed.
Any larger meetings between different households at the same time is currently banned, with the government rules meaning someone cannot see both parents at the same time.
Mr Johnson’s speech also said that people will be allowed to sunbathe or chat in a park with a person from a different household, with social distancing in place.
In Downing Street press conference on Wednesday (13 May), Dr Jenny Harries said meeting with family could later be expanded to allow different households to meet as “bubbles” or “clusters”, but such a step needs to be carefully considered.
Family gatherings that involve multiple generations are still considered too dangerous until more is known about the virus and who is the most at risk.
Driving to other destinations, such as parks or beaches, within England will also be permitted from Wednesday (13 May), but should only be done with members of your own household.
Crossing the border to Wales or Scotland for leisure activities is not allowed if different restrictions are in force.
Government guidance states: “People may drive to outdoor open spaces irrespective of distance, so long as they respect social distancing guidance while they are there, because this does not involve contact with people outside your household.
“When travelling to outdoor spaces, it is important that people respect the rules in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and do not travel to different parts of the UK where it would be inconsistent with guidance or regulations issued by the relevant devolved administration.”
In Scotland, the ‘stay at home’ message still remains, meaning people should not leave their households to visit family members or friends.
In Wales, the current advice on social distancing and visiting family remains the same, with the only changes to lockdown guidance being the reopening of garden centres and no limit on the amount of exercise per day.
Northern Ireland is allowing groups of between four and six people who do not share a household to meet up outdoors, while maintaining social distancing.
Visits to immediate family indoors will be allowed, provided social distancing is adhered to, with the exception of those who are shielding.
What are the fines if rules are broken?
Police officers have the power to stop and ask you where you are heading and could issue a fine if they do not believe your reason for travel falls within what is considered ‘reasonable’ for leaving your home.
Those who ignore the restrictions on movement could land an initial fine of £30, rising to unlimited fines for non-compliance.
In England, fines for breaching coronavirus regulations will now rise from £60 to £100, while payment of the fine within 14 days will reduce the sum to £50, up from the present £30.
Repeat offenders will see the fine double for each subsequent breach to a maximum of £3,200.
Refusing to provide police with a name and address to avoid being given a fine is an arrestable offence.


inews--2020-05-11--When will gyms reopen? Latest on UK coronavirus lockdown rules as gymnasiums remain closed

When will gyms reopen ?
Latest on UK coronavirus lockdown rules as gymnasiums remain closed The Prime Minister revealed the government ’ s plans for the “ roadmap ” out of lockdown on Sunday 10 May , but the leaders of Scotland , Wales and Northern Ireland have instead decided to remain with the original “ stay home ” message , rather that Johnson ’ s new “ stay alert ” slogan .
Although this will now be unlimited , Sturgeon said there must be “ no sunbathing , picnics or barbecues ” , which is in contrast to Johnson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister of Wales , Mark Drakeford , said that Wales would allow more frequent exercise and the opening of garden centres , but that said schools will not reopen from 1 June .
While some countries , such as Czech Republic , have opened gyms up again , others like Italy are keeping them closed , even as restrictions are eased .
Johnson said that his blueprint for a gradual easing of the coronavirus lockdown in England could see primary schools , nurseries and shops partially reopening from 1 June .
Some cafes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ places or worship and socially distanced cinemas , could return to business from July , although specific details haven ’ t yet been given .
The government hasn ’ t yet confirmed when gyms will be able to reopen .
Health club chain PureGym has previously said that it is working out how its facilities could be laid out to allow for social distancing , alongside capping member numbers .
However , Mr Cobbold added that gyms will only be re-opened when permitted to do so by the government .
He said : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and careful opening , we will probably , when permitted by government , start by opening half a dozen sites and then expand from there when we 're confident that we have a model that 's safe and secure for members for the future.
” The PureGym website states : “ While we are closed , we will work hard to ensure your club is clean , safe , and ready for your return .
We are looking forward to welcoming you back.
” Fitness studio Barry 's Bootcamp also released a statement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we will be reopening but will continue to closely follow the advice of the government and local authorities '' .
They are currently offering virtual workouts for members .
Virgin Active will also inform customers when it will reopen clubs `` once it is safe to do so based on government advice '' .
Have gyms reopened in other European countries ?
In Italy , the country has entered into phase two of its exit out of lockdown .
Italians will now be able to travel within regions in order to visit relatives @ @ @ @ @ @ @

The coronavirus lockdown has changed people’s lives in many ways, but one of the biggest has been the way in which we exercise.
Gyms, leisure centres and indoor pools had all been closed since 21 March, while home workout equipment is like gold dust online.
However, the Government has finally given the go-ahead for gyms to open their doors again.
When did the gyms reopen?
Gyms, leisure centres and indoor pools reopened on Saturday 25 July.
They will have to follow strict new guidelines, such as introducing timed bookings for workouts and restrictions on showering.
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden said the move to reopen gyms would help get the country “match-fit to defeat the virus” amid growing fears of inactivity among the population due to social distancing restrictions.
“The reopening of gyms is the news millions across the country have been waiting for with many people desperate to jump on a spinning bike or dive into a pool,” he said.
“Our comprehensive guidance will ensure gyms, pools and leisure centres have the support they need to reopen safely for their customers and staff.”
In the Government’s Our Plan to Rebuild document, released on Monday 11 May, gyms and fitness studios were originally part of step three of the lockdown exit plan, starting from 4 July.
However, Mr Johnson later said indoor gyms are categorised as “close proximity” businesses and would remain shut.
He said: “The business and culture secretaries will establish task forces with public health experts and the sectors to help them become Covid-secure and reopen as soon as possible.”
The industry reacted with frustration at Mr Johnson’s “catastrophic decision” to give the green light to many sectors of the economy, but not gyms.
Mark Sesnan, managing director of GLL, which runs 270 leisure and sport facilities on behalf of local authorities, said: “This will bad for business, bad for jobs and bad for the health of the nation.”
He added: “The Government is ignoring the health of the nation, when it has been proven that conditions such as obesity and diabetes increase the risks associated with Covid-19.”
What safety measures will be in place?
When gyms reopen, it won’t be business as usual.
According to The Times, gyms and swimming pools will require receptionists to use clickers to count numbers going in, and booking systems will be put in place to prevent overcrowding.
On gym floors, people will only be permitted to use equipment that’s spaced two metres apart and a gym’s maximum capacity will be calculated based on three metres squared per person.
Changing rooms and showers will be in use but “extra care” will be provided to maintain social distancing in these areas, while sweat towels will not be permitted on gym floors or studios.
Health club chain PureGym has previously said that it is working out how its facilities could be laid out to allow for social distancing, alongside capping member numbers.
PureGym CEO Humphrey Cobbold, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that the chain was working to upgrade hygiene and sanitation procedures in order to “provide a safe environment for the future.”


inews--2020-05-11--When will swimming pools reopen? Latest on UK coronavirus lockdown rules, with pools still closed

When will swimming pools reopen ?
Latest on UK coronavirus lockdown rules , with pools still closed Latest news on UK coronavirus lockdown rules and when swimming pools could reopen - with pools staying temporarily closed .
The UK currently remains under lockdown , but many are now wondering when shops , hairdressers and gyms could begin to reopen again , after restrictions were first put in place on 23 March ( Photo : Shutterstock ) The UK currently remains under lockdown , but with Boris Johnson has revealing a `` conditional plan '' to reopen society , many are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gyms could begin to reopen again .
If you ’ re a keen swimmer and eager to get back in your local pool , when is it likely to be open again ?
Although this will now be unlimited , Sturgeon said there must be “ no sunbathing , picnics or barbecues ” , which is in contrast to Johnson ’ s new advice .
The First Minister of Wales , Mark Drakeford , said that Wales would allow more frequent exercise and the opening of garden centres , but that said schools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It ’ s likely that when pools do reopen , fewer swimmers will be allowed in at a once - and for less time .
Virgin Active said that it will inform customers when it will reopen clubs `` once it is safe to do so based on government advice '' .
The government is currently planning ahead for the “ roadmap ” out of lockdown , which Boris Johnson is expected to reveal on Sunday 10 May .
However , there has been confirmation yet as to when swimming pools will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currently likely that when pools do reopen , fewer swimmers will be allowed in at once - and for less time .
Virgin Active said that they will inform customers when clubs are to reopen , `` once it is safe to do so based on government advice '' .
What safety measures will be put into place ?
England ’ s national governing body Swim England has provided initial guidance to the government on how to reopen more than 4,000 of the country ’ s swimming pools , and will now start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clubs and swim schools .
This will be based on the latest scientific guidance on the measures needed to ensure the safe use of facilities following the coronavirus lockdown .
Mr Lamburn said : “ The science and understanding of Covid-19 in the swimming pool environment is evolving every day and we are continuing to monitor and support research in this area in cooperation with international partners .
“ We will be developing our guidance in line with scientific research and alongside the information from the Government on the national exit of lockdown.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ideally like up to three weeks ’ notice for the industry to get pools ready to be used again .
However , they are endeavouring to support the government whatever the time frame is , to ensure facilities are both safe and ready for swimmers to return to the pool .

Regular swimmers have been among those most affected by the coronavirus lockdown. Pools have been closed for almost four months, and did not reopen as hoped on 4 July, when pubs and restaurants returned.
However, both indoor and outdoor pools can now reopen, as well as gyms and leisure centres.
Here is everything you need to know.
When will indoor pools reopen?
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden confirmed that indoor pools, gyms and leisure centres could open their doors again from Saturday 25 July.
He said the move would help get the country “match-fit to defeat the virus” amid growing fears of inactivity among the population due to social distancing restrictions.
“The reopening of gyms is the news millions across the country have been waiting for with many people desperate to jump on a spinning bike or dive into a pool,” he said when he announced the move.
“Our comprehensive guidance will ensure gyms, pools and leisure centres have the support they need to reopen safely for their customers and staff.”
When will outdoor pools and lidos reopen?
Outdoor pools and lidos opened on 11 July, along with grassroots outdoor sports.
This started with cricket, and was followed by other sports, such as football and basketball.
What will pools be like now they have reopened?
Under guidelines released by Swim England, the national governing body for swimming, swimmers are now urged to shower at home, arrive wearing their swimwear under their clothes and bring toys and floats with them.
This change, called “beach style turn up and swim”, is designed to make sure swimmers spend less time in the changing room and to ensure that showers are available post-swim.
The number of lanes in a pool will be cut in half, with swimmers told to maintain a safe distance from others at all times, and diving will come with extra precautions because it “can result in injury that requires ambulance care”.
Jane Nickerson, chief executive of Swim England, told The Sunday Times: “In the early days, it may be that you are encouraged not to use the changing rooms.
“What we’re suggesting is going ‘beach-ready’. Some pools might ask you just to put on a towelling robe and – let’s hope you’re not on a bus, you’re in a car – travel home like that.”
She added: “Kids playing around – I don’t think we’ll be seeing that for some time because of the social distancing. It doesn’t mean that we couldn’t do lessons, or some club and community activity – as long as they are programmed and maintaining a distance.”
Swimmers will made made to maintain social distancing rules, with one person per three-square-metre area.
The government did not confirm exactly when pools would be allowed to reopen under its initial road map out of lockdown published in May.
However, it was thought that they would stay closed until at least 4 July, the date earmarked as the earliest possible time for phase three of the lockdown exit plan (including the opening of hospitality businesses) could begin.
Virgin Active had previously said simply that it would inform customers when it will reopen clubs “once it is safe to do so based on government advice”.
‘The science is evolving every day’
Richard Lamburn, Swim England Head of Facilities, had previously explained how the organisation had been in discussions with Government departments regarding the necessary guidance.
Mr Lamburn said: “The science and understanding of Covid-19 in the swimming pool environment is evolving every day and we are continuing to monitor and support research in this area in cooperation with international partners.
“We will be developing our guidance in line with scientific research and alongside the information from the Government on the national exit of lockdown.”
Mr Lamburn said Swim England would ideally like up to three weeks’ notice for the industry to get pools ready to be used again.
However, they are endeavouring to support the government whatever the time frame is, to ensure facilities are both safe and ready for swimmers to return to the pool.
“We have been in regular communication with key stakeholders regarding the impact on facilities and have also been sharing knowledge and information with Sport England, Swim Ireland, Scottish Swimming and Swim Wales,” adds Mr Lamburn.
“A lot of pools have never closed before so we’ve been providing the guidance and support needed to local authorities and operators to ensure they were safely shut down and maintained.”


inews--2020-05-12--The Big Flower Fight contestants caught ‘stealing designs and cheating’ as show nearly turned physic

The Big Flower Fight contestants caught ‘stealing designs and cheating’ as show nearly turned physical, says Vic Reeves

The Big Flower Fight contestants caught ‘ stealing designs and cheating ’ as show nearly turned physical , says Vic Reeves Accusations of cheating by contestants challenged to create huge-scale floral installations in latest hobby show “ It ’ s quite tense because they haven ’ t got much time .
And there are other people - mentioning no names - who go and steal off other people , ” the comedian said .
“ There have been moments of theft .
Which has been noted by the judges .
There ’ s a high level of competitiveness now.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
“ I 'm not saying a punch-up , but there were words said.
” Filmed before lockdown inside an arboreal “ dome ” in Kent , the contestants are given a pile of scrap metal , wood and natural materials to choose from , alongside a selection of grasses , blooms and foliage .
The winning pair will design their own sculpture at London 's Royal Botanic Gardens in Kew .
Judge Kristen Griffith-VanderYacht , florist to the stars , said : “ Flowers are obviously beautiful by their own design but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that creates a lot of tension in the dome because they don ’ t last forever.
” “ If I can see that they ’ re ( the contestants ) coasting through , then what ’ s the point ?
I don ’ t want you to come to this competition and show me something you ’ ve already done.
” Reeves , who hosts the show with the comedian and actor Natasia Demetriou , said of the challenge : “ It 's not Gardeners ' World .
It 's punk rock gardening.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ very keen people who produce these magnificent structures almost out of nothing , and very quickly .
It always astonishes me . ''
`` They ’ re so passionate about it and it ’ s great to see anyone with that amount of passion producing anything .
If they ’ ve got passion , you ’ re with them .
”

Contestants resorted to cheating in a new Netflix series challenging amateur gardeners to create huge floral installations, host Vic Reeves revealed.
The Big Flower Fight, launching on Netflix next week, asks ten creative couples to fashion large-scale floral sculptures, depicting scenes including giant insects and flying pigs.
Reeves said rivalry between the international teams of plant-obsessed descended into dirty tricks.
“It’s quite tense because they haven’t got much time. And there are other people – mentioning no names – who go and steal off other people,” the comedian said.
‘Theft’ accusation
“There have been moments of theft. Which has been noted by the judges. There’s a high level of competitiveness now.”
Did the floral competitors come to blows? “I’m not saying a punch-up, but there were words said.”
Filmed before lockdown inside an arboreal “dome” in Kent, the contestants are given a pile of scrap metal, wood and natural materials to choose from, alongside a selection of grasses, blooms and foliage.
‘Dome tension’
The winning pair will design their own sculpture at London’s Royal Botanic Gardens in Kew.
Judge Kristen Griffith-VanderYacht, florist to the stars, said: “Flowers are obviously beautiful by their own design but they’re also perishable, and that creates a lot of tension in the dome because they don’t last forever.”
“If I can see that they’re (the contestants) coasting through, then what’s the point? I don’t want you to come to this competition and show me something you’ve already done.”
Avant-gardening
Reeves, who hosts the show with the comedian and actor Natasia Demetriou, said of the challenge: “It’s not Gardeners’ World. It’s punk rock gardening.”
“There are some very, very keen people who produce these magnificent structures almost out of nothing, and very quickly. It always astonishes me.”
“They’re so passionate about it and it’s great to see anyone with that amount of passion producing anything. If they’ve got passion, you’re with them.”
Competing pairs include Yan, a fine artist-turned-florist, who won a gold medal at the Chelsea Flower Show, and Henck, a freelance florist.
Monet, a RHS Hampton Court Flower Show medal winner and Stephanie, who won first prize at the South of England Agricultural Show in 2018, are the youngest contestants.
The Big Flower Fight screens on Netflix on May 18


inews--2020-05-12--Coronavirus furlough scheme extended for four more months, announces Rishi Sunak

Coronavirus furlough scheme extended for four more months , announces Rishi Sunak From July companies will be asked to pay a portion of employees ' salaries The Government 's coronavirus furlough scheme has been extended for four months but , from July , companies will be asked to pay a portion of employees ' salaries .
Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced that he would extend Job Retention Scheme to October but would asking employers to share the financial burden with the Treasury .
The scheme , which allows companies to apply for the Government to pay upto 80 per cent of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until the end of July .
After this point companies will be permitted to allow furloughed employees to return to work on a part-time basis - to help ease the transition back to full-time employment- and the Government will ask companies to share the cost of salaries .
Furloughed workers across UK will continue to receive 80 per cent of their current salary , up to £2,500 , as long as the scheme is in place .
Chancellor Rishi Sunak speaking in the House of Commons ( Photo : PA ) Responding to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chancellor Anneliese Dodds , Mr Sunak said : `` I can announce today that the Job Retention Scheme will be extended for four months until the end of October .
`` By that point , we will have provided eight months of support to British people and businesses . ''
Mr Sunak continued : `` Until the end of July there will be no changes whatsoever .
Then from August to October , the scheme will continue for all sectors and regions of the UK but with greater flexibility to support the transition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ using the scheme will be able to bring furloughed employees back part-time .
And we we will ask employers to start sharing with the Government the cost of paying people 's salaries .
New statistics published today revealed the scheme has been used by almost one million businesses for 7.5 billion employees .

The Government’s coronavirus furlough scheme has been extended for four months but, from July, companies will be asked to pay a portion of employees’ salaries.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced that he would extend Job Retention Scheme to October but would asking employers to share the financial burden with the Treasury.
The scheme, which allows companies to apply for the Government to pay upto 80 per cent of workers’ salaries, will not change until the end of July.
Phase to part-time work
After this point companies will be permitted to allow furloughed employees to return to work on a part-time basis – to help ease the transition back to full-time employment- and the Government will ask companies to share the cost of salaries.
Furloughed workers across UK will continue to receive 80 per cent of their current salary, up to £2,500, as long as the scheme is in place.
Responding to an urgent question from Labour’s shadow chancellor Anneliese Dodds, Mr Sunak said: “I can announce today that the Job Retention Scheme will be extended for four months until the end of October. By that point, we will have provided eight months of support to British people and businesses.”
Mr Sunak continued: “Until the end of July there will be no changes whatsoever. Then from August to October, the scheme will continue for all sectors and regions of the UK but with greater flexibility to support the transition back to work.
“Employers currently using the scheme will be able to bring furloughed employees back part-time. And we we will ask employers to start sharing with the Government the cost of paying people’s salaries. Full details will follow by the end of May.”
Speaking in the Commons, the shadow Chancellor she had only been informed about the Chancellor’s changes “in the last few seconds” and will examine them “very, very carefully”.
Ms Dodds said people do not want to be furloughed, adding: “It’s critically important they are not penalised for that choice. We welcome the flexibility mentioned, we’ve asked for this repeatedly.”
Mel Stride, Tory MP and Chair of the Treasury Committee, said the extension was a “welcome step” but the committee would “carefully scrutinise”the changes in full when the details are published.
People falling through the gaps
He added that the lack of changes to the scheme until July would be “worrying” for people who “continue to fall through the gaps of the Government’s support measures such as the lack of furlough support to help cover dividend income generated through self-employment”.
Labour’s Gerald Jones raised ongoing concerns about people who started a job in March and therefore were not on the payroll before the cut off date – rendering them ineligible.
He said: “We on this side of the House have set out ways in which the furlough scheme arrangements could be adapted to include those new starters who have just missed out without risking fraudulent payments. So will the Chancellor give these proposals urgent and serious consideration?”
Mr Sunak responded: “These things are not straightforward to do and the ability to change them and add complexities to them will just simply make it more likely that they don’t work and more likely that people have to wait a lot longer to get the support that they desperately need at this time.”
Extending to July costs £10bn
Citizens Advice chief executive Gillian Guy said the Chancellor had taken “sensible steps” to ensure “people don’t face a financial cliff edge”.
But she added: “Sadly, we continue to see cases where people in the shielded group are being denied furlough. People in this group need a right to access this scheme if they cannot work safely. Nobody should be forced to choose between paying the bills or protecting their health.”
New statistics published today revealed the scheme has been used by almost one million businesses for 7.5 billion employees.
Continuing the scheme on its current terms to the end of July will cost the taxpayer around £10 billion, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) estimated.
This would bring the total support provided through this scheme up to around £60 billion.


inews--2020-05-12--Generic TV adverts about 'togetherness' during coronavirus lockdown aren't resonating as well as pra

Generic TV adverts about 'togetherness' during coronavirus lockdown aren't resonating as well as practical messages

Generic TV adverts about 'togetherness ' during coronavirus lockdown are n't resonating as well as practical messages People are more keen to see practical advice Shoppers much prefer ads with practical messages during the coronavirus lockdown and are shunning generic messages about `` togetherness '' , new data shows .
Advertising related to the Covid-19 pandemic from brands such as Heinz , Tesco , and Aldi have been the most effective to date , according to analysts Kantar , while ideas from McCain , Nike , and Bird 's Eye have fallen short .
Where Heinz saw success with its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for vulnerable children , which scored well for long-term potential and short-term sales , and Tesco 's `` Helps for safer shopping '' also invoked a widely positive response , Bird 's Eye 's `` What 's for Tea ? ''
TV ad performed poorly , with low memorability and consumers suggesting they were unlikely to engage .
Shoppers want practical advice as well as good humour Kantar ranked marketing campaigns ' effectiveness out of 100 , measuring long and short-term potential in how they resonated with the public , and noting how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sales .
The data shows brands focusing on what they are actively doing to help people during the virus outbreak have proven more successful than those trying to push sentimental messages about pride and a common purpose .
Nike 's `` Play for the world '' campaign , for example , was n't disliked , and sparked some emotion , but failed to cut through , Kantar said .
While Aldi 's lighthearted relaunch of its Kevin the Carrot series , a recent Christmas hit , not only reminded consumers of happier times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the NHS .
`` An unwritten set of category codes gets established because these key moments are considered essential to conveying what the product is and what it does , ” Kantar said .
“ If you ’ re a deodorant brand for example you need to show wetness , armpits and the product being applied .
This is often accentuated further when the brand doesn ’ t have anything different to say about itself versus other alternatives .
“ The brands that win out are those that pursue a creative and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and original human insight that resonates deeply , or through a unique brand vision or purpose , ” Kantar says .
“ Ads that reference the current situation but don ’ t have anything different to say to the next brand , struggle to cut through .
They don ’ t make the featured brands feel different to other alternatives and they aren ’ t strongly building love towards the brands either .
”

Shoppers much prefer ads with practical messages during the coronavirus lockdown and are shunning generic messages about “togetherness”, new data shows.
Advertising related to the Covid-19 pandemic from brands such as Heinz, Tesco, and Aldi have been the most effective to date, according to analysts Kantar, while ideas from McCain, Nike, and Bird’s Eye have fallen short.
Where Heinz saw success with its campaign to launch 12 million free breakfasts for vulnerable children, which scored well for long-term potential and short-term sales, and Tesco’s “Helps for safer shopping” also invoked a widely positive response, Bird’s Eye’s “What’s for Tea?” TV ad performed poorly, with low memorability and consumers suggesting they were unlikely to engage.
Shoppers want practical advice as well as good humour
Kantar ranked marketing campaigns’ effectiveness out of 100, measuring long and short-term potential in how they resonated with the public, and noting how likely they would be to lead to sales.
The data shows brands focusing on what they are actively doing to help people during the virus outbreak have proven more successful than those trying to push sentimental messages about pride and a common purpose.
Nike’s “Play for the world” campaign, for example, wasn’t disliked, and sparked some emotion, but failed to cut through, Kantar said.
While Aldi’s lighthearted relaunch of its Kevin the Carrot series, a recent Christmas hit, not only reminded consumers of happier times, but also looked to raise money for the NHS.
Empty campaigns without a clear, specific message aren’t as memorable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL_UDABXLX8
“An unwritten set of category codes gets established because these key moments are considered essential to conveying what the product is and what it does,” Kantar said.
“If you’re a deodorant brand for example you need to show wetness, armpits and the product being applied. This is often accentuated further when the brand doesn’t have anything different to say about itself versus other alternatives.
“The brands that win out are those that pursue a creative and distinctive creative platform, through a powerful and original human insight that resonates deeply, or through a unique brand vision or purpose,” Kantar says.
“Ads that reference the current situation but don’t have anything different to say to the next brand, struggle to cut through. They don’t make the featured brands feel different to other alternatives and they aren’t strongly building love towards the brands either.”


inews--2020-05-12--Kimmy vs The Reverend: the interactive Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt special on Netflix explained, and w

Kimmy vs The Reverend: the interactive Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt special on Netflix explained, and who's in the cast with Daniel Radcliffe

Kimmy vs The Reverend : the interactive Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt special on Netflix explained , and who 's in the cast with Daniel Radcliffe Here 's everything you need to know about the special interactive final episode of Tina Fey 's hit comedy Tina Fey and Robert Carlock wrapped their Netflix comedy , Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt , up into a satisfying ending with its fourth and final season back in January .
But the story was not quite finished .
One final episode of the sitcom is now available to stream - and you get to choose what happens .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bandersnatch , Kimmy vs The Reverend is an interactive episode in which you get to make choices for the characters , influencing their final fate .
Here is everything you need to know ... How does the interactive episode work ?
The episode will mostly run as normal , with occasional dilemmas , in which the viewer is asked to make a decision - as shown by the trailer .
For example , Kimmy will be asked a question , and you get to choose her response .
The responses you pick will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pathways , until you reach one of multiple endings .
You can go back and change your answers , so that you get to catch every joke and see all the possible outcomes , or you can just settle for your original choices , and the ending they lead you to .
What is it about ?
We are promised this will be Kimmy 's `` biggest adventure yet '' .
She is getting married , but in order to get there on time she has to foil The Reverend 's evil plot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The most notable of those new faces is Daniel Radcliffe .
The Harry Potter star plays British royal Prince Frederick - a brand new love interest for Kimmy very late in the game .
All the key characters are back : Ellie Kemper as Kimmy , Tituss Burgess as Titus , Carol Kane as Lillian , Jane Krakowski as Jacqueline and Jon Hamm as The Reverend .

Tina Fey and Robert Carlock wrapped their Netflix comedy, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, up into a satisfying ending with its fourth and final season back in January.
But the story was not quite finished. One final episode of the sitcom is now available to stream – and you get to choose what happens.
In the style of Black Mirror‘s Bandersnatch, Kimmy vs The Reverend is an interactive episode in which you get to make choices for the characters, influencing their final fate.
Here is everything you need to know…
How does the interactive episode work?
The episode will mostly run as normal, with occasional dilemmas, in which the viewer is asked to make a decision – as shown by the trailer.
For example, Kimmy will be asked a question, and you get to choose her response. The responses you pick will take the story down a series of pathways, until you reach one of multiple endings.
You can go back and change your answers, so that you get to catch every joke and see all the possible outcomes, or you can just settle for your original choices, and the ending they lead you to.
What is it about?
We are promised this will be Kimmy’s “biggest adventure yet”. She is getting married, but in order to get there on time she has to foil The Reverend’s evil plot.
Several beloved guest stars return, as well as several new faces.
Who is in the cast?
The most notable of those new faces is Daniel Radcliffe. The Harry Potter star plays British royal Prince Frederick – a brand new love interest for Kimmy very late in the game.
All the key characters are back: Ellie Kemper as Kimmy, Tituss Burgess as Titus, Carol Kane as Lillian, Jane Krakowski as Jacqueline and Jon Hamm as The Reverend.
Guest stars returning for the special include Sara Chase (Cyndee), Lauren Adams (Gretchen), Sol Miranda (Donna Maria), Amy Sedaris (Mimi), Michael Carlsen (Mikey), Fred Armisen (Bobby Durst) and Chris Parnell (Junior).
Jack McBrayer (30 Rock) and Johnny Knoxville (Jackass) also join the cast.